The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About#coa.lu.hp.507 Gillispe Ave.0006.2014.AHPC F4W THE CITY 4F ASPEN City of Aspen Community Development Department CASE NUMBER 0006.2014.AHPC PARCEL ID NUMBERS 2735 12 111 007 PROJECTS ADDRESS 507 GILLISPE AVE PLANNER SARA ADAMS CASE DESCRIPTION HPC AMENDMENT REPRESENTATIVE JOHN ROWLAND DATE OF FINAL ACTION 2.27.14 CLOSED BY ANGELA SCOREY ON: 6.25.14 Z-7 3 51211100 t Lk, L Pee nits Ile Edit Record Navigate Form Repoqs Format Tab Delp 1 JUMP I r .� .Main �rstom Fiefs €luting Stags Fee Summary � ►� Rnu�rrq Hi�or}� 3 .Permit type lahpc lkpen Historic Land Use Permit f 8886.281�.�,HPC � j c Address 'n0 VVGILLESPIE Apt/Suite a �,SPEIa � Site CO Zip 81611 Permit Information � Master permit Routing queue aslu8l Apied =127P2014, Project 1 Status pending _ Approved Description HPCAMEIIDMEIIT Issued Clod` Final +�r � 01.'?2281J JOHN ROALAND 379 8918 � clock Running Dais� Expires ` Submitted JOHN 'Vt A 1 �� X'. Last name RO��L�,IJO�ERGLIGHTGIJ Fri name JOHI�1�SARAH PO BO X'52 a2 iASI EI1 CO 81612 Phone i;9 7 8?379-8111 address Applicant w Owner is applicant? Contractor is applicant? � pp � pp ` Last name IR'OV"dLAI°JC?BRGl1GHiOIJ First name JOHP1&SARAH PO BO?52 E ASPEN CO 81612 Phone l8'8 3 9 8111 ;Gust' :29568 i�drires Lender Lash name First name Phone 1 l Address 1 of AspenGold5(server angeias RECEPTION#: 608470, 03/0,,..014 at 11:30:56 AM, 1 OF 7, R $41.00 Doc Code RESOLUTION Janice K. Vos Caudill, Pitkin County, CO RESOLUTION OF THE ASPEN HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION (HPC) APPROVING A SUBSTANTIAL AMENDMENT FOR MAJOR DEVELOPMENT FOR THE PROPERTY LOCATED AT LOT B,OF THE BECK HISTORIC LOT SPLIT, 507 GILLESPIE STREET,CITY AND TOWNSITE OF ASPEN, COLORADO RESOLUTION NO. 8, SERIES OF 2014 PARCEL ID: 2735-121-11-007 WHEREAS, the applicant, John Rowland and Sarah Broughton, requested a Substantial Amendment to HPC Resolution #10, Series of 2007 and HPC Resolution #35, Series of 2007, for Major Development for 507 Gillespie Street, Lot B of the Beck Historic Lot Split, City and Townsite of Aspen, Colorado; and WHEREAS, Section 26.415.070 of the Municipal Code states that "no building or structure shall be erected, constructed, enlarged, altered, repaired, relocated or improved involving a designated historic property or district until plans or sufficient information have been submitted to the Community Development Director and approved in accordance with the procedures established for their review;" and WHEREAS, at their regular meeting on March 28, 2007, the HPC considered the application, found the application was consistent with the review standards and the City of Aspen Historic Preservation Design Guidelines, and approved Resolution #10 of 2007 granting Conceptual Approval for Major Development and Variances by a vote of 3 —0; and WHEREAS, at their regular meeting on August 22, 2007 the HPC considered the application, found the application was consistent with the review standards and the City of Aspen Historic Preservation Design Guidelines, and approved Resolution #35 of 2007-granting Final Approval for Major Development by a vote of 3 —0; and WHEREAS, at their regular meeting on October 25, 2010 the Aspen City Council considered an application for a 3 year extension of vested rights and approved Resolution 488 of 2010 granting an extension of vested rights to September 9, 2013; and WHEREAS, at their regular meeting on June 12, 2013 the HPC considered the application, found the application was consistent with the review standards and the City of Aspen Historic Preservation Design Guidelines, and approved Resolution 421 of 2013 granting a Substantial Amendment to the Development Order by a vote of 6—0; and WHEREAS, Section 26.415.070.E.2 of the Municipal Code states that " all changes to approved plans that materially modify the location, size, shape, materials, design, detailing or appearance of the building elements as originally depicted must be approved by the HPC as a substantial amendment; and 507 Gillespie—Substantial Amendment HPC Resolution #8, 2014 Page 1 of 2 WHEREAS, the HPC will review the application, the staff analysis report and the evidence presented at the hearing to determine the project's conformance with the City of Aspen I-listoric Preservation Design Guidelines. The HPC may approve, disapprove, approve with conditions or continue the application to obtain additional information necessary to make a decision to approve or deny; and WHEREAS, Sara Adams, in her staff report dated February 26, 2013, performed an analysis of the application based on the standards, found that the review standards and the "City of Aspen Historic Preservation Design Guidelines were met, and recommended approval, and found the review standards for a setback variance were not met and recommended denial; and WHEREAS, at their regular meeting on February 26, 2013, the Historic Preservation Commission considered the application, found the application was consistent with the review standards and "City of Aspen Historic Preservation Design Guidelines", and approved the substantial amendment application with conditions by a vote of 5 —0. NOW,THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED: HPC grants approval for a Substantial Amendment to Resolution #10 and 435, Series of 2007, and Resolution #21, Series of 2013 for the property located at 507 Gillespie Street with the following conditions: 1. Setback Variance: a. The west side yard setback variance for the built in grill is denied. b. All lightwells in the setbacks must meet the Land Use Code exception for lightwells in setbacks. 2. Garage doors shall meet the residential design standard 26.410.040.C.1 and appear as single stall doors for review and approval by staff and monitor. 3. All approvals and conditions granted during Conceptual (Resolution #10, Series of 2007) and Final (Resolution 435 Series of 2007) Review, and Substantial Amendment Resolution # 21 Series of 2013 are valid, with the exception of the approvals specified herein. 4. There shall be no deviations from the exterior elevations as approved without first being reviewed and approved by HPC staff and monitor, or the full board. APPROVED BY THE COMMISSION at its regula eh on the 6`h day of February 2014. Jay aytin, Chair Ap=vea F r� m: Debbie Quinn, Assistant City Attorney AT athy Strie land, Chief Deputy Clerk Exhibit A: Approved elevations and site plan 507 Gillespie— Substantial Amendment HPC Resolution #8, 2014 Page 2 of 2 i a! I ' ; I I i ------------------------------_ ` 50701LLESPIE I � .wun nws I i I I 1 SITE PL SITE PLAN -- - '41.1 s=1 ZERO EeVEOEleP t4 cELFWUIF IC01ue GeBLE EOPM ANO lO t .n., W' / BE1tEP CONRE01ENt IXE bCMEN10PRVPOPI'InN OF iFF � *}�" wstaXC XESauecE p;l,Y. o�1en�.e�ou�n lyn n� .I cUPREP WINUtM•f0 y- I NAPLRIEOlXIXY - - .- OOfM f0 fd3P1 YCRi i113]ORK PlSOLA[E v EX.aIM ""` H4igRIC IREEb t 30301. %' NF011EHtYv OINNOE9 / 3p�eay5erE ', rMO ePPROVEO -' OENOP •� _ I e15 pI11FHwE NEOMVE YES MecM • LXeHE uiv EauF _ REOIWE OIEOXeOeGLL /' OXeSE AIm FEUE bOI GLLEE3PIE I� Y amw I I � _� _� —_ � •'J ereX meleeR eteeei I OOMPAR1910N NORTH ELEVATION A0.4.2 C� 0 .0 HE ice ionN xooDFVS �—�oPNFP wxoow rn pArtuNF .*�_ / EV VEPNACUAD LOPNEP WINDOW TO 'WS pE REp � BFriEN FRAME MIIM"\ � . ry''�� wm�:un—�\\� IIII 1 �' uWnnm. ' _ --_ �aswsm Mrwaw4Nu 1 1 4 Na it r Nr.ww •.Lill 1 I — - .a - — -------------- 44➢— --------------------- — -- —I� �� I '- REOUCEOeFNESrw w `�-paNSaare i �I qXr WFUS '1 ii i 'i oNTSDECU.,�REEwFNI 'I +.yam �_r___ 1-1 tPS1rnIG NEenIwLE _f_______ OPNEP WINDIP•3 APF N MgDEPN INiFRRPETAiP1N TO pF1�wNI,tlNUir6E BETVEEN A NCF I \ Rlxrrwlc wn m.n m• PE- /^ vPa_T� 9 wn ARRPwEn oESIa. PENOVF LIMMHEV REMOVE AEQYMDAL / .. GLFRE M'DRLUE W GILLESPIE PROPOSED it EAST ELEVATIONS 1 1 swF s,nry it I �1 'L______- __-..--_._ - ... 1��1 -eEPO fAVE OETEE TO WI EbMrE CtXnY r —AN EXO IO BE(ItP LOUPLE4ENl � FORM M axle EXO VPaPaxnoN Or INE o.mar \ -- 91Wtlt�REtMMOE M w� ' VnNUOW tO CIPNNE \ -- ~�P sIYME UnuI(.PIU1 wu,.u.i a.: wEWe KPEO Ulherurw.� '"r _–�49[v vtRx4,,RER xx rrrwtt— = _— __ /XOPNFN WiM00W IUENEUE wmu.rw– ywww a.wt vrY r nNOr _ _ / 1 6lUXN:TNEE9 r � / mwrara'Erwr arruwma 4�RIEIEO FNiPY _ il_ ______________________ - •"I r YNXRre .u�u.urR �� I' •tAtR}ff4 wl.EfOw ERE�MuOERh wtEPPRE+ERON TOOFEEXENIIEIF BErvtiEN n,s1UPoU ENDXFW FgY9f B3]B filE REplESrtU ��qp�pp 1 UrUNUttl 1 hM1M EleWirON PPp]OE� • __.___..__ rr•er 991]]P.] REYOYECHP9r9Y rrrY EF UE914h EN04EON490r .—. GIPK MDELYb – � � uECXEMG. CIU9f ENOEr uE v y,yr / wrrE,u ..x� 507GILLG9PiE r -- ..,,.-_ PR0P03EO NORTH ELEVATIONS �' tc49.]nr•ro A4.2 _ _ . 1 • � O ZE�EEVE EEr]IL ro ceLEBBr,Te IcnHC -� MBLE f0�NO i�DO BPoEDTI�LWPIEMENT t H19TDPK NEBDtEiEE---- ro��•n�.B�ouynlyyyn 4BwLE Ur[rtufvul wnwsm #. r',awT.r w� / iU.LLIEY VENN GULM .r0auanw-- rww. ur .r w-- �n—__ /.EOANEHVnNDOW TA• B[iTFP ENBNE NN ��- Awraraw vwfe.f � it I III � �wnrwr... vRCO•i wliu+ - ��• __ — _ •GOHNEN wwoow ulE�NDcenH NIERPPE1Npn rOgFFEA:MUiE BETVEEH \ HLSiDHrG wU NCW�UV9E 0]f6]011 HEOl1EBT[D pppq�0ppf6BBpp C.HENGE9 \/ f np]iNDEwII N �.r 06.1]Hllf --_ HK n.rnOVED DENGH C gVNFY- GELIOVE NECNUlKl1 usE BND ttuE A,o. 507 GILLEVIE rt....nr. __ I MEWVE�b9 rw.OwLEa.[BTEfl �'i � OVNtlI1ME NVb4 1 � I wenn YWlfOlQr.wre. w - �� wwrw� MnM.w s III l wesrr � ,l 1 rwuw ___ ___ ---------.il Ir PROP rnlry OSED i soum ELEVATIONS �1 fc/a6-fnBwla r 1 I l I r-------- A4.4 I rowland+broughton e.pndewre/urban design/inferior design 234 a bopW.ave 1830 bloke eL ale 200 aspen.m 81611 d--.m 80202 9]0.544.90060 303.308.1373p 9]0.54434]3f 303.308.1375f Issue: / 01.26.2014 f - - — - - HPC HEARING FOR MODIFICATIONS jTO APPROVAL ONJUNE 11,2013 MENT I I It , Ta,4, f r— aeaa,�tea .kp. I � �ounox Revision. sw o�oa,u,E ---nom-�-------- ki - _ \ c\ I ` \ " - 5 \ .MUn p a� _'-I wm:nrwse BE Ili �I II� _ _ \ --, I FEW o 3, pweEw Ar w ;-177-177/—/77-/—/ 7 - .MeO.4kE \ , �K �, �i .,, '�R it — L--------------------------------- `\ � 4 \ 507 GILLESPIE �I �I u� I' I aEf.e�m•w 507 W.GILLESPIE STREET II I ASPEN,CO 81611 PROJECT NO: P2013.03 DWG FILE P2013.03—A1.1 HPC.dwg SHEET TITLE PROPOSED s SITE PLAN s SCALE:1/8"=V-0" PLAN TRUE PROPOSED NORTH® NORTH® A 1 . 1 1 SITE PLAN A1.1 SCALE: 1/8'=1'-0" gi ® reonae—� ............ G S EN TE -- - L NOi� 1. T1�IIS IS A LEED ANDIDATE PROJECT.MATERIALS AND METHODS NOT SPECIFIED NEED TO BE 10. ALL MILLWORK TO BE COORDINATED WITH MILLWORK PACKAGE.VERIFY RE°UIRL. S OF R�VIEWEDAND PROVED BV HE ARCHITECT. APPLIANCES PRIOR TO FABRICATION.SUBMIT SHOP DRAWINGS FOR ARCHITECT APPROVAL AND 2. FERENCE DI ENSION PLAN FOR DIMENSIONS NOT SHOWN. AUTHORIZATION. 3. E SCHEDUL AND OUTLIN SPECIFICATIONS FOR SUPPLEMENTAL INFORMATION. 11. ALL LUMBER IN CONTACT WITH CONCRETE OR GRADE TO BE PRESSURE TREATED OR APPROVED 4. OVIDE BLO ING AT ALL TH ACCESSORIES,HOOKS,ART WALLS,MIRRORS,ETC. EQUIVALENT. '' 5. 'CONFIRM MO NTING BRACKET LOCATIONS FOR TE LOCATION AND ROUTING OF ALL ELECTRICAL CIRCUIT,MAIN,AND LOW-VOLTAGE LINES AND PROVID BLOCKING ASMEOUIRED. WITH G.C. ''" - -'---- 8. FURNITURE OWN FOR S�jALE AND REFERENCE NLY. 13. SPOT EL ESENT AS-BUILT CONDITIONS AS MEASURED ON SITE.FIELD VERIFY ANY row I a n d+b ro u g h t o n 7. INTERIORF NA IS 2%8 NOMINAL UNLES OTHERWISE. DEPEND ITEMS. 9MIp6duce/urban design lWarfor design G.C.TO CO IRATE SIZE OF WINDOWS WI H DEPTH OF FURRING ON ADJOINING WALL WHERE 14. NOTIFY CHITECT IM DIATELY IF CONFLICT ARISES. APPLICABL TO AVOID COI4FLICTS.COOR ATE WITH ARCHITECT FOR DETAILS. 15. DO NOT C T NEW PEN TRATIONS IN EXTERIOR ENVELOPE WITHOUT ARCHITECT REVIEW AND 234 a hopkins— 1830 bloke st,ste 200 G.C.TO VE�IFV REOUIREdd RADON SYSTEM PERATION,AND CONFORMANCE TO APPLICABLE CODES. APPROV aspen,m 81811 tlanver,m 80202 ' I ' 16. SECURI SYSTEM BY C. 970.544.90060 303.308.13730 970.544.34731 303.308.1375 f I ' 1 I ' If I 01.26.2014 HP C HEARING FOR MODIFICATIONS 1 2 3 O I 5 6 7 B TO THE SUBSTANTIAL ADMENDMENT APPROVAL ON JUNE 12,2013 43'$ 1'- 3718' 2Z$ 4'-2- 37'-10• 1ST• 7$ 1?$ 4'$ /^1'-0318' I s SI JEASENNENDITC LZ I515 W.GILLESPIE STREET I REF.S�VEY f HOUSE EXISTING GARAGE \ I ' VE�ON \ ON\\_(��EXISITNG CORRUGATE METAL PIPE 18-DIA.X 40'LONG GRADE ABO \ � I PROPERTY LINE 'g �C ——— —_— — ��/�/7 r X77 ,��i /-•i —7 i,/T / i,'/' i 114 /�'7T ' T/,T/�\ 7�.(, /�7� /'/;T� ,'T Revision'. iC��/�/1t�•117 L�1.LL/L 1 '/ tL/' /L —Lam'//✓1L. L�/=c-/ '1.J1LR L�/�t�1�1L/_i/��/ �.1 L/ L!:i1L�L�/ / �1L�'L�! LL�'l�1/✓a'!1L/��' / — ( � ❑ I ❑ ADLI A ASSUMED MICROPILE L--J - 1 1710-7 71R BEDROOM WITH CONCRETE CAP- 1 1 Y 071 REF.SHORING PLANS i =_ _- 1 ,.,� ROOOM i \ BEDROOM -- -- __ E/� 001 I 010 Te 002 1 If ACCESS PANEL I \ \ \ OR DOOR TO STORA tG -------r" STAIR GE UNDER ADU REAT ROOM RIM --- — — --�� OPEN F=RE '001 WALLS SEWER EASEMENT- 1 N REF.SURVEY®� 1 GRADE BEAM ABOVE- --ii FOR FUTURE �� R°UGH-IN ( C y PLUMBING �� FOR FUTURE C ._— I/• _— PLUMBING II (V. MICROWAVE �� 1 V a BATH AND EXHAUST, 901 CONC. I % 10$ 012 �-0- ,� / //T� /'T T�T�//ABOVE// / y T� r // i/ T�i�// T '?T';7. T�i��7!//�/ T�ir'/7, SETBACK LINE D �T^✓1' 1' Lf "'✓1L'�'Lir�cJ1 X11 ci' cl< 507 GILLESPIE 7TT/T /7T/7TT/TT/7 TT T/ T/7TT/7T/7T TT/7T/7TT/� < s� Na \ 51" �� PItOPEXIY LINE /-� �- \ 16F F 507 W.GILLESPIE STREET I ° II I fTE II-------� ---_� ---� ASPEN,C081611 4 DOEOF ORNEWAV, PPROX.30-ABOVE 100'TRIP OF PLANTING WOOD TIMBER WALL I II I WITH ABOVE 1 2 3 O 5 5 7 8 I I 633 N.4TH STREET 639 N.4TH STREET I PROJECT NO: P2013.03 DWG FILE: I I P2013.03_A2.0_HPC.dwg SHEET TITLE I �I PROPOSED BASEMENT x I FLOOR PLAN I d I PLAN TRUE SCALE:3/16"=1'-0" I PROPOSED NORTH� NORTH® I I r7 BASEMENT FLOOR PLAN /� e O AZ.0 SCALE: 3/16-=1'-0' �•'� 11 3t ......... ... GENERAL NOTE E S NE • 1. THIS IS A LEER CANDIDATE PROJECT.MATERIALS AND METHODS NOT SPECIFIED NEED TO BE O. ALL MILLWORK TO BE COORDINATED WITH MILLWORK PACKAGE.VERIFY REQUIRE], ,OF REVIEWED AND APPROVED BY THE ARCHITECT. APPLIANCES PRIOR TO FABRICATION.SUBMIT SHOP DRAWINGS FOR ARCHITECT APPROVAL AND - 2. REFERENCE DIMENSION PLANS FOR DIMENSIONS NOT SHOWN. AUTHORIZATION. 3. SEE SCHEDULES AND OUTLINE SPECIFICATIONS FOR SUPPLEMENTAL INFORMATION. 11. ALL LUMBER IN CONTACT WITH CONCRETE OR GRADE TO BE PRESSURE TREATED OR APPROVED WNW _ 4. PROVIDE BLOCKING AT ALL BATH ACCESSORIES,HOOKS,ART WALLS,MIRRORS,ETC. EQUIVALENT. S. CONFIRM MOUNTING BRACKET LOCATIONS FOR ALL TELEVISION LOCATIONS WITH OWNER/ARCHITECT 12. COORDINATE LOCATION AND ROUTING OF ALL ELECTRICAL CIRCUIT,MAIN,AND LOW-VOLTAGE LINES AND PROVIDE BLOCKING AS REQUIRED. WITH G.C. '- S. FURNITURE SHOWN FOR SCALE AND REFERENCE ONLY. 13. SPOT ELEVATIONS REPRESENT AS-BUILT CONDITIONS AS MEASURED ON SITE.FIELD VERIFY ANY r o w I a n d+b r o u g h t o n 7. INTERIOR FRAMING IS 2X8 NOMINAL UNLESS NOTED OTHERWISE. DEPENDANT ITEMS. archRecfure/ur0an desgn/interior de4ign B. G.C.TO COORDINATE SIZE OF WINDOWS WITH DEPTH OF FURRING ON ADJOINING WALL WHERE 14. NOTIFY ARCHITECT IMMEDIATELY IF CONFLICT ARISES. APPLICABLE TO AVOID CONFLICTS.COORDINATE WITH ARCHITECT FOR DETAILS. 15. DO NOT CUT NEW PENETRATIONS IN EXTERIOR ENVELOPE WITHOUT ARCHITECT REVIEW AND 234 a hWIk a a- 1830 bilk,SL ale 200 9. G.C.TO VERIFY REQUIRED RADON SYSTEM,OPERATION,AND CONFORMANCE TO APPLICABLE CODES. APPROVAL. ,,pen,m 81811 earner,m M202 18. SECURITY SYSTEM BY G.C. 970.544.9008 a 303.308.1373 o 970544.3473, 303.308.13751 1.. 01.26.2014 HPC HEARING FOR MODIFICATIONS TO THE Z 3 v 4 4 $ O B APPROVAL N JUNE 12,20 BNDMENT 20%r 48.0' 4'-1036' 2r-(r r$ 3T-10' 184' W-W L I 1z-w N-0' 3w STAIR— PROPERTVLBE — STAIR WOOD FLOORS GUEST l R—s- 107 THROUGHOUT I BATH.F.). STAIRS AND b LEVEL TWO — . ._. ._.. .. .. _ .._ .. .._ — SETBACK LINE A I n GLASS RA X. GARAGE PANEL � 1 w, Ke I i r.O.P1 B w . x w srF^w CLOSET 3 gyr�1 WOODSIDINC 1 8I CABINETS ZI GUARDRAIL L---J 1 DUET W 7 C n I \J ® ® C � ( pYT I N., I OFOF KCOVERED 2 I ENTRY BELOW b w STACK I � BUILT-IN ———— ---- I I D SETBACK LUNE RNAL — INTERNAL — 507 GILLESPIE DOWNSPOUT DOWNSPOUT PROPERTY LINE 507 W.GILLESPIE STREET ASPEN,CO 81611 I 8 �J PROJECT NO: P2013.03 DWG FILE: P2013.03_A2.2_HPCAwg SHEET TITLE PROPOSED LEVEL TWO FLOOR PLAN SCALE:3/16"=1'-0" PLAN TRUE S PROPOSED NORTH® NORTH 1 ®® A2.2 LEVEL TWO FLOOR PLAN A2,2 SCALE: 3/16'=1'-0' Ti !e : :...... .......... .... w:::::....:..... —Yip-,4�•.-- vv.. :�........... METAL ROOF AND rowland+broughton RIDGE CAP amhdsChs9/Mben ds.Mye/kdorw d.,4r OVERFLOW SCUPPERS 234.h opkina sve 1630 eleke st,ale 200 aspen,m 81611 Canvey,m 80202 SNOWFENCE,GUTTER 970.544.11Mo =1.308.1373o SIMPLE UTILITARIAN AND INTERNAL 970.544.34731 =1308.1375r GARAGE FORM NODDING DOWNSPOUT J,r.o.RIDCE TO ALLEY VERNACULAR CORNER WINDOW TO CORNER WINDOW TO CAPTURE 1t9,_7,4 BETTER FRAME AJAX VIEWS OF RED MTN. SOLAR PANELS WOOD LAP SIDING Issue: WOOD GUARDRAIL WITH CORNER BOARD 01.26.2014 SNOW FENCE.GUTTER S� AT MASTER DECK WOOD T&G SIDING HPC HEARING FOR MODIFICATIONS AND DOWNSPOUT SCUPPERS TO THE SUBSTANTIAL LONJUNE1,2013 MENT APPROVAL ON JUNE 12,2013 GILLESPIE STREET WOOD SIDING JOII ALIGN WITH TOP OF TO GARAGE DOOR SCUPPER OVERFLOW � I WOOD T8G SIDING STEEL COLUMN,PTO.RADE WOOD SCREEN ALLEY WOOD LAP SIDING WITH CORNER BOARD \ \\ EXISTING AND PROPOSED G EAST CONCRETE WALL T.O.PLYN'D. —— 1I I I BOCCE COURT I I I LIGHT WELL I I BEYOND LI U `—J \� WOOD FENCE AND GATE I I II r--� I I I \ i I I Reviaian' I I I j l REDUCED FENESTRATION I \ �� CONSOLIDATE I I j ON SIDEYARDS TO I LIGHT WELLS r o.FONC. L ____ ____________________I _ J BETTER COMPLEMENT �'-0 = L------------------------------------J _T Z_ HISTORIC RESOURCE 'CORNER WINDOW ARE A MODERN INTERPRETATION TO DIFFERENTIATE BETWEEN HISTORIC AND NEW HOUSE 02.26.2014 REQUESTED CHANGES PROPOSED 1 EAST ELEVATION A4.1 SCALE'. 3x16'=V-0' 06.12.2013 HPC APPROVED DESIGN REMOVE CHIMNEY REMOVE MECHANICAL CHASE AND FLUE METAL CLAD 507 GILLESPIE CHIMNEY FLUE METAL ROOF SOLAR PANELS METAL SIDING REMOVE GLASS GUARDRAIL 507 W.GILLESPIE STREET - ASPEN,CO 81611 _ METAL ROOF T k k WOOD SIDING 1 GLASS RAIL AT WOOD SIDING 1 METAL FASCIA _ MASTER DECK TBD - - STEEL TUBE COLUMN-REF.STRUCT A METAL FASCIA WOOD SIDING ENTRY CANOPY METAL SIDING ADU PARKING SPACE METAL SIDING METILL SIDING k i ' STEEL COLUMN,PiD. ALLEY � � J` --- WOOD SIDING GILLESPIE STREET 1 _ EXISTING GRADE - _ - ——EXISTING GRADE ; ; 1 PROJECT NO: P2013.03 --- --- -----------------__ ____ _—_—__—_—_—_ —__ _— _ _____ ____I—___ DWG FILE. H------------� I I I r------ —-- --------- -- ------ --1 ----____—_—__-------_ P2013.03_A4.1 HPC Cornp_OMAdw9 100'SURVEY=100'ARCH I I \\ I I I I ARCHITECTURE EQUALS 100' SURVEY 7888' SHEET TITLE 8'TALL FENCE PROPOSED OEDO'"�� E EAST LEVATIONS II i I II II L_--_—__-- L----- J SCALE:3/16"=V-0-- ------------------------------- A4.1 5e • ZERO EAVE DETAIL TO CELEBRATE ICONIC GABLE FORM AND TO BETTER COMPLEMENT ......... ...:::: THE SCALE AND PROPORTION OF THE SNOW FENCE,GUTTER HISTORIC RESOURCE _ AND DOWNSPOUT ;er.;v::r.::e:!:r.: 113 SLOPE OF ROOF rowland+broughton 12 WOOD ACCENT TRIM 10v SNOW FENCE,GUTTER 234 a hopkins eve 1830 Blake st.ste 200 AND DOWNSPOUT e70.5 m 06 0 denval.w METAL FLASHING�� METAL ROOF AND SIMPLE UTILITARIAN 970. 0 303.308.13730 CORNER WINDOW TO CAPTURE \ RIDGE CAP 970.544.34]31 303.308.1375f VIEWS OF RED MTN. GARAGE FORM NODDING METAL CLAD WINDOWS TO ALLEY VERNACULAR WRAP CORNER WITH METAL 0 OF WITH WOOD TRIM TO MATCH WINDOW FRAME �/ WOOD CORNER BOARD 001'1.26'2014 2: WOOD T&G SIDING WOOD LAP SIDING SNOW FENCE,GUTTER AND DOWNSPOUTS HPC HEARING FOR MODIFICATIONS \ WOOD ACCENT DETAIL TO THE SUBSTANTIAL ADMENDMENT PLANTED STEEL CHANNEL WOOD T&G SIDING APPROVAL ON JUNE 12,2013 FASCIA ENTRY CANOPY WITH IA CORNER WINDOW TO FRAME HISTORIC TREES WOODING SIDING JOINT WOOD SCREEN TO AUGH WITH TOP OF PAINTED STEEL COLUMN- WRAP CORNER WITH MIETJIL WALL GARAGE DOOR REF.STRUCT. TO MATCH WINDOW FRAME - -_ i \ I EXISTING AND PROPOSED GRADA� _--_-- — �— l ------ CONCRETE WALL WRH —i I I I LL—\,Jl SCUPPER BEYOND EXISTING AND SIMPLIFIED ENTRY PROPOSEDGRAOE DOOR TO COMPLIMENT HISTORIC RESOURCE // I JJ L 'CORNER WINDOW ARE A MODERN INTERPRETATION TO DIFFERENTIATE BETWEEN HISTORIC AND NEW HOUSE 02.26.2014 REQUESTED CHANGES PROPOSED PROPOSED 1 NORTH ELEVATION 2 NORTH ELEVATION A4.2 SCALE: 3116"=1'-0° ({Q,2 SCALE: 3116"=t'-0' 06.12.2013 HPC APPROVED DESIGN REMOVE CHIMNEY AND MECHANICAL CHASE AND FLUE REMOVE MECHANICAL CHASE AND FLUE METAL CHIMNEY 12 MECH.VENT BEYOND_REF.A7.X Q10 FLUE BEYOND VENT DUCT 507 GILLESPIE METAL FASCIA METAL FLASHING 507 W.GILLESPIE STREET WOOD SIDING METAL ROOF ASPEN,CO 61611 WOOD SIDING -- METAL ROOF ©III WOOD SIDING 210 INTERNAL DRAIN IN FIN WALL- DRAIN TO RETENTION BASIN METAL FASCIA _ ENTRY CANOPY = METAL FASCIA l ADU CANOPY STRICT.TUBE COLUMN- WOOD SIDING REF.STRUCT FENCE STEEL COLUMN,PTD. ADU PARKING SPACE WOOD SIDING — EXISTING GRADE— EXISTINGGRADE---, -- /�� FENCE DASHED \ / —EXISTING GRADE PROJECT NO: IN FOR CLARITY \ P2013.03 _ —_ ------ -----------r-- --_ DWG FILE: -- ----- I ARCHITECTURE 100'-0' P2013.03_A4.1_HPC C..P_OpW.dwg EQUALS I 1 I I I I I I I i SURVEY 888' SHEET TITLE PROPOSED NORTH ELEVATIONS a SCALE:3116"=1'-0" -------- - -------- A4.2 �r % >.. : _.............. .. . .......... .......... o.5L' SIMPLE UTILITARIAN rowland+broughton 29 2METAL ROOF GARAGE FORM NODDING aI/eroanaes;yn/inlem.a.mpl TO ALLEY VERNACULAR 234 a Mpkins eve 103=112a 0 SNOWFENCE,GUTTER aspen,.81611 80202 AND DOWNSPOUT REDUCED FENESTRATION 970544.9M 3033061373 ON SIDEYARDS TO SOLAR PANELS o"'ATE,2 ax BETTER COMPLEMENT METAL CLAD WINDOW M / HISTORIC RESOURCE WITH WOOD TRIM \/ Issue: ` 812 113 SLOPE OF ROOF 01.26.2014 SNOW FENCE,GUTTER HPC HEARING FOR MODIFICATIONS / SNOWFENCE,GUTTER AND DOWNSPOUT TO THE SUBSTANTIAL ADMENDMENT WOOD LAP SIDING WOOD T&G GUARDRAIL AND DOWNSPOUT ! III APPROVAL ON JUNE 12,2013 I 10,x, WOOD SIDING JOINT TO ALIGN E—— SCUPPER OVERFLOW ! WITH TOP OF GARAGE DOOR WRAP CORNER WITH METAL ——TO MATCH WINDOW $ y/ STEEL COLUMN,PTD.- �: ALLEY REF.STRUCT. GILLESPIE STREET \ // -- --- / WOOD TdG SIDING ——— \ EXISTING AND \ COVERED CONCRETE FIRE PROPOSED GRADE \\ —_ TERRACE FEATURE \ r---- — --------- - ------- ----- ---- r--- --------------H--�------------------'�I I -----1 I BOCCE I LIGHT WELL BEYOND I I / \ I GATE AND FENCE F——-I L I I / I I L__7 u I I CORNER WINDOW T�FRAME _= Re-lon: HISTORIC TREES 'CORNER WINDOW ARE A MODERN INTERPRETATION TO DIFFERENTIATE BETWEEN HISTORIC AND NEW HOUSE 02.26.2014 REQUESTED CHANGES PROPOSED _ rl—'� WEST ELEVATION t3 SCALE: 3/18-=1'0" 06.12.2013 HPC APPROVED DESIGN REMOVE MECHANICAL CHASE AND FLUE METAL ROOF 507 GILLESPIE METAL FASCII 507 W.GILLESPIE STREET REMOVE GLASS ASPEN,CO 81611 GUARDRAIL WOOD SIDING METAL ROOF 13 1 SOLAR PANELS METAL FASCIA - GLASS RAILING METAL FASCIA GARAGE ENTRY - GATE AND FENCE —— METAL FASCIA METAL SIDING COVERED ERRACE T i - ALLEY GILLESPIE STREET - —=1-__- --- STEEL COLUMN,PTD. BIKE STORAGE AREA FENCE WITH GATE EXISTING GRADE—7 E: TERRACE COVERED EXISTING GRADE-— PROJECT NO __ _ P20t3.03 ------------ ---------- -------- DWG FILE: _— —— _____ _--_ r--------'------�,__�---------------------- r--- , r P2013,03 A4.1 COmp_OpW.Cwg -—————T00'SURVEY=iDV ARCH I I ARCHITECTURE 100'-0' r EOUALS SURVEY 7888' SHEET TITLE 5' it r-- L-----� it j PROPOSED ------T-----4 I I I WEST ELEVATIONS t SCALE:3116"=1'-0" A4.3 3g ZERO EAVE DETAIL TO CELEBRATE ICONIC GABLE FORM AND TO BETTER COMPLEMENT THE SCALE AND PROPORTION OF THE HISTORIC RESOURCE SIMPLE UTILITARIAN V3 SLOPE or ROOF 12 rowlend+broughton GARAGE FORM NODDING 101 Q70 wvNbvB../1/6..�1#4i_m7ea:re^ TO ALLEY VERNACULAR SNOW FENCE,GUTTER METAL FLASHING CAP 2W•h.8 s ave 1830 Blake sL s8 202 AND DOWNSPOUT 97.544.9W6 Bt 611 tle303308 80202 970.544.8008 0 303 308.13 7 a WOOD T&G SIDING 970.544.34]31 303.308.1375/ METAL ROOF AND WOOD T&G SIDING CORNER WINDOW TO RIDGE CAP AND ACCENT TRIM BETTER FRAME AJAX TO RDGE WRAP CORNER WITH METAL 19'.11 / / / i / i / WOOD CORNER / i TO MATCH WINDOW I- TRIM PANELS TRIM BOARD i NOW FENCE,GUTTER 01.26.2414 WOOD SCREEN AND DOWNSPOUTS ¢ WOOD GUARDRAIL TO THE SUBSTFANTULL ADMENDMENT WOOD T8G SIDING WOOD T&G SIDING APPROVAL ON JUNE 12,2013 OVERFLOW SCUPPER REVEAL TO ALIGN WITH TOP OF GARAGE DOOR WOOD T&G GARAGE DOOR STEEL COLUMN,PTO.- N ADU PARKING SPACE REF.STRUCT. E ---�� WOOD LAP SIDING EXISTING AND —� —� PROPOSED GRAD— To CONC. --- PROVIDE GAS LINE CONCRETE 1oe,1—'Tee Y i2o-0vLrwo. I(----------------------1 II II r-- �I II II II II II II II II II II II II II II I II RaN II II II II II II II II II II ----- I I --- -------- L-- J 'CORNER WINDOW ARE A MODERN INTERPRETATION TO DIFFERENTIATE BETWEEN HISTORIC AND NEW HOUSE 02.26.2014 REQUESTED CHANGES PROPOSED PROPOSED 1 SOUTH ELEVATION 2 SOUTH ELEVATION /{4.4 SCALE', 3/16"=1'-0' - -—- — A4.4 SCALE: 3118°=V-0' 06.12.2013 HPC APPROVED DESIGN REMOVE \ { REMOVE MECHANICAL CHIMNEY CHASE AND FLUE 12 10� REFA;X 507 GILLESPIE VENT FLUE BEYOND METAL FASCIA METAL FLASHING CAP REMOVE GLASS 507 W.GILLESPIE STREET GUARDRAIL ASPEN,CO 81611 SOLAR PANELS i N / / 1 WOOD SIDING 0 / N WOOD SIDING RAILING AT METAL ROOF i r i / MASTER DECK,TBD. METAL FASC METAL FASCIA b ADU ENTRY METAL CLAD GARAGE DOOR COLUMN BEYOND- REF.STRUCT N i 0 / METAL SIDING WOOD SIDING - D ADU PARKING SPACE STEEL COLUMN.P D GILLESPIE STREET - / WOOD SIDING —EXISTING GRADE EXISTING GRADE--— ——EXISTING GRADE EXISTING GRADE————� - - I PROJECT NO: P2013.03 / I(— I — — ----------- --------------- ---- -- DWG FILE_: iar SURVEY.17 ARCH ----_---------------- ARCHITECTURE 1W-O' P2013.03A 4.1 HPC COmP_OPtAO9 I I I I I I EQUALS I l SU RVEY 78W SHEET TITLE l PROPOSED SOUTH ELEVATIONS fI L--------- J I I L----------------- I SCALE:3/16"=1'-O" A4.4 1 • GENERAL NOTES to 1. THIS IS A LEED CANDIDATE PROJECTS.MATERIALS AND METHODS NOT SPECIFIED NEED TO BE REVIEWED AND APPROVED BY THE ARCHITECT. 2. X rowland+broughton amhftdum/urban design/interior design 234 a bopluns eve 1830 Elake state 200 espen,.31611 d,,wr.,m 80202 970.534.90DBa 303.308.13730 ';05"9006. 1373. 0 5413473 1 303.306.1375 t leave: 01.26.2014 HPC HEARING FOR MODIFICATIONS � TO THE SUBSTANTIAL ADMENDMENT 1 $ 3 v 4 5 6 T7� S APPROVAL ON JUNE 12,2013 V-103/18' 2Z-V P-7 3T-10' 1S-' V4r 12d' 4-' iM'-0378' GUTTER,DOWNSPOUT AND HEAT TAPE Revision: SNOWFENCE INTEGRAL GUTTER AND DOWNSPOUT b SNOW FENCE `2 RC OF b I METAL I H I a I - -- SNOWFENCE § III .I INTEGRAL i GUTTER AND DOWNSPl1T 8 I MENerwaE ROOF I RD. RD. 1 ` I D MECH.C:�' — — .. —. .—. OVERFLOW SCUPPER THRU SCUPPER C-CHANNEL T 507 W.GILLESPIE STREET ASPEN,CO 81611 I PROJECT NO: P2013.03 DWG FILE: P2013.03_A2.3 HPC.d" SHEET TITLE T PROPOSED 3 ROOF PLAN a' SCALE:3116"=1'-O" PLAN TRUE PROPOSED NORTH NORTH 1 3 ROOF PLAN 0 0 A2.3 A2.3 SCALE: 3116'=1'-0' E1 s e_ ft I_ _ _ — — _ _ _ _ — _ — _ _ _ _ _ _ — _ __ _ Gil NOTES I. TT�I�IIIS IS A LEED CANDIDATE PR JECT.MATERIALS AND METHODS NOT SPECIFIED NEED TO BE ALL MILLWORK TO BE COORDINATED WITH MILLWORK PACKAGE,VERIFY REOUIREML F I R�VIEWED AND APPROVED BYI THE ARCHITECT. APPLIANCES PRIOR TO FABRICATION.SUBMIT SHOP DRAWINGS FOR ARCHITECT APPROVAL AND 2. FERENCE DIMENSION PL FOR DIMENSIONS NOT SHOWN. AUTHORVATION. I 3. EE SCHEDUL S AND OUTLIN SPECIFICATIONS FOR SUPPLEMENTAL INFORMATION. 11. ALL LUMBER IN CONTACT WITH CONCRETE OR GRADE TO BE PRESSURE TREATED OR APPROVED 4. RC BLO ING ATALL TM ACCESSORIES,HOOKS,ART WALLS,MIRRORS,ETC. EQUIVALENT. 5. /CONFIRM MO NTING BRACKET LOCATIONS FOR IJ�EWARCAREi°T-1� COORDINATE LOCATION AND ROUTING OF ALL ELECTRICAL CIRCUIT,MAIN,AND LOW-VOLTAGE LINES AND PROVIDE BLOCKING AS EQUIRED. WITH G.C. FURNITURE SHOWN FOR SrX,AND REFERENCE NLY. 13. SPOT ESENT AS-BUILT CONDITIONS AS MEASURED ON SITE.FIELD VERIFY ANY r o w I a n d+b r o u g h t o n 7. INTERIOR FRYJ4ING IS 2X6 NOMINAL UN OTHERWISE. DEPEND ITEMS. amhitectum/urban desgn/inferior design G.C.TO COORDINATE SIZE OF WINDOWS W DEPTH OF FURRING ON ADJOINING WALL WHERE 14. NOTIFY AFCHITECT I EDIATELY IF CONFLICT ARISES. APPLI TO AVOID CO�FLICTS.COORD NATE WITH ARCHITECT FOR DETAILS. 1S. DO NOT C NEW PEN TIONS IN EXTERIOR ENVELOPE WITHOUT ARCHITECT REVIEW AND 234 a hold a ave 18301 M,eta 200 G.C.TO FY REQUIRE RADON SYSTEM,OPERATION,AND CONFORMANCE TO APPLICABLE CODES. APPROV I aspen,m 61611 aenver,co 80202 / / 18. SECURITY'SYSTEM BY¢.C. 870.644.9006 o 303.308.1373 0 970.544.34737 303.308.1375f LOT A ' GILLESPIE HISTORIC PARTNERS,LLC / LOT LINE ADJUSTMENT PLAT PLAT BOOK 96 AT PAGE 60 / / lases: / 03.132013 AR80RIST REV IEW 4 / 5 8 7 8 04.03.2013 HPC AMENDMENT 28 2 J / 43'-0 05.30.2013 4'- 3l1T 2z4r P-Y 3T-10• 18'J1' 9'-9' 12'-0' 1'd i^7'-0 3w HPC SUBMITTAL 07.08.2013 CONSTRUCTION DOCUMENTS S-0. N 9 I CONST2019 PRECAUTION DURING EXCAVATION NE DED Sl,p NOTE:SPECIAL COORDINATION AND CONSTRUCTION DOCUMENTS 2 CONCRETE WALK FOR NEIGHBOR'S CONCRETE PAD I � PRECAUTION DURING EXCAVATION NEEDED Oz.O3.zO1a WITH RANDOM 8•JOINTS EAS HOUSE FOR DITCH AND METAL PIPE-REF.SOIL (12' 8') I �. � STABILJZATION PLAN CONSTRUCTION DOCUMENTS 3 I GARAGE GATE LOCATION TO BE COORDINATED — WITH NEIGHBORS TREES l SNOIIISF M4 SNO87 SF N3 NEWFENCE \ �\ EXISITNG C GATE METAL PIPE 18'DL1.X 40'LONG 118 SF 267 3F \\ NEIGHBOR PROPERTY LINE \ — — — — — _ — — _ _ _ — SLAB ON GRADE I , 3 F , s WIM T w m / Rwil �-eroew.ue—�° � �\\ m STORAGE I GARDEN C a S O 1 F- T.O.9TR vn I LL en1 I I STAIR N _ - CONCIffIE WAtl 1 on _ 1 T.O.QONC. .P. aOVE T.O.CONC.H.P_ 1 I _107 IF \ PANTRY 100'-8' 100'.11 318• T.O.WALL .vs c0i 7 tab O _ SETBACK LINE .� GARAGE PROPERTY LINE 107 N GREAT \ DRAIN To COVERED CONCRETE ROOM 101 TE—E 1 ae mI I+ \ SNOWL 12 q w a w a CONCRETE ' i T.O.CONC. I I _ '() ENTRY --- SB SF Ifr RE APRON AND PARKING T.O.CONC. IF 101 I w T.O.STEP _._ 1 DW TRb we I I 991-W n _ __-_ -_ wt + I I BOCCE BALL T.O.SAND (j) KITCHEN IN Y - > ° 3 I SAND gg WI �/ 105 U SN WMELT#1 b' I� T O I us �. z r•3 STORAGE I I T.O.WALL T.O.WALL - 1\8 SF C m F 100'-0' 1 e COUNTER N GAS F.P. < POWDER YQ O -_- -- 102 I \ \ CONCRETE WALL _ O y win AKI r(] 1O° m Sk - \ D — — / \ � CONCREIE WALK PARKING— .. GARDEN. — E eM._ . .eP1aoT .� WITH RANDOM 8•JOINTS SO y TT7TT/7TT7TT/ T77T77 T T 7 (12'-48') \ 507 GILLESPIE j0 zzzzz zzzzzz z Z__Z z z z z z A k0000/ _ �f PR OPERTY LINE ——————— �————————- \ 0a \ � 507 W.GILLESPIE STREET NOTE: I I —————————————————— ——— — — \ ASPEN,CO 81611 REFERENCE LANDSCAPE SITE T PLAN,A3.1,FOR INFORMATION I `EDGE OF DRIVEWAY. REGARDING EXTERIOR SPACE. I APPROX.30'ABOVE 100' I I STRIP OF PLANTING WOOD TIMBER WALL ITH ABOVE Of Cato SEWER EASEMENT- l� R I I REF.SURVEY TOTAL%NSF MELT gP 90 II JOF.M G. 1 i # O O 3 5 8 O O I 633 N.4TH STREET 639 N.4TH STREET PROJECT NO: P2013.03 DWO FILE P2013.03_A2.1 HPC.dwg SHEET TITLE PROPOSED e gwg LEVEL ONE g FLOOR PLAN SCALE:3/16"=1'-0" PLAN TRUE PROPOSED NORTH� NORTH® I ri_"� LEVEL ONE FLOOR PLAN /� . �,1 SCALE: 3/18'=1'-p' �'••'` ZERO EAVE DETAIL TO CELEBRATE ICONIC GABLE FORMi^. y BETTER COMPLEMENT THE SCALE AND PROPORTION OF , HISTORIC RESOURCE rowland+broughton CORNER WINDOW TO CAPTURE VIEWS OF RED MTN. �a ■IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIINII - HPC HEARING FOR MODIFICATIONS TO THE SUBSTANTIAL ADMENDMENT APPROVAL ON JUNE 12,2013 irrrwwrr■.ri�wr r �� m ��w7�r■ SIMPLIFIED ENTRY P—bion: DOOR •COMPLIMENT CORNER WINDOW TO FIRAME - - - .�e�,t..•, ,. REQUESTED HISTORIC RESOURCE HISTORIC TREES • 4 CHANGES 1 a a ELEVATION SCALE: 3111"o 1- HPC APPROVED DESIGN HISTORIC RESOURCE REMOVE MECHANICAL 515 GILLESPIE CHASE AND FLUE i at. REMOVE CHASE AND FLUE ICI =--=_�_------..� 507 GILLESPIE Ll up PROJECT NO: DWO FILE: SHEET TITLE 4•i�.— wr�w•�� - j r " --�rr�wrrrrrrrurw4��r�. ♦ � ,� �rrrrrwrrrrvmia 7 ■■ �wlirrrwwwr..riwwr.� KC. �rrr rr�irr.i�� • my �r:aw.w ■ i .. :1■1 COMPARISION NORTH ELEVATI• AO EXHIBIT 7� AFFIDAVIT OF PUBLIC NOTICE REQUIRED BY SECTION 26.304.060 (E), ASPEN LAND USE CO ADDRESS OF PROPERTY: A)• / SPIN , Aspen, CO SCHEDULED PUBLIC HEARING DATE: � 20 14 �N S�Ay QUA�Y STATE OF COLORADO ) ss. County of Pitkin ) I, 4J r ' (&UE-Zyk) (name, please print) being or representing an Applicant to the City of Aspen, Colorado, hereby personally certify that I have complied with the public notice requirements of Section 26.304.060 (E) of the Aspen Land Use Code in the following manner: Publication of notice: By the publication in the legal notice section of an official paper or a paper of general circulation in the City of Aspen at least fifteen (15) days prior to the public hearing. A copy of the publication is attached hereto. Posting of notice: By posting of notice, which form was obtained from the Community Development Department, which was made of suitable, waterproof materials, which was not less than twenty-two (22) inches wide and twenty-six (26) inches high, and which was composed of letters not less than one inch in height. Said notice was posted at least fifteen(15) days prior to the public hearing on the day of , 20_, to and including the date and time of the public hearing. A photograph of the posted notice (sign) is attached hereto. Mailing of notice. By the mailing of a notice obtained from the Community Development Department, which contains the information described in Section 26.304.060(E)(2) of the Aspen Land Use Code. At least fifteen (15) days prior to the public hearing, notice was hand delivered or mailed by first class postage prepaid U.S. snail to all owners of property within three hundred (300) feet of the property subject to the development application. The names and addresses of property owners shall be those on the current tax records of Pitkin County as they appeared no more than sixty (60) days prior to the date of the public hearing. A copy of the owners and governmental agencies so noticed is attached hereto. Neighborhood Outreach: Applicant attests that neighborhood outreach, surrunarized and attached, was conducted prior to the first public hearing as required in Section 26.304.035, Neighborhood Outreach. A copy of the neighborhood outreach summary, including the method of public notification and a copy of any documentation that was presented to the public is attached hereto. (continued 077 next page) �I Mineral Estate Owner Notice. By the certified mailing of notice, return receipt requested, to affected mineral estate owners by at least thirty (30) days prior to the date scheduled for the initial public hearing on the application of development. The names and addresses of mineral estate owners shall be those on the current tax records of Pitkin County. At a minimum, Subdivisions, SPAS or PUDs that create more than one lot, new Planned Unit Developments, and new Specially Planned Areas, are subject to this notice requirement. Rezoning or text aniendinent. Whenever the official zoning district map is in any way to be changed or amended incidental to or as part of a general revision of this Title, or whenever the text of this Title is to be amended, whether such revision be made by repeal of this Title and enactment of a new land use regulation, or otherwise, the requirement of an accurate survey map or other sufficient legal description of, and the notice to and listing of names and addresses of owners of real property in the area of the proposed change shall be waived. However, the proposed zoning map shall be available for public inspection in the planning agency during all business hours for fifteen (15) days prior to the public hearing on such amendments. i i Si a e The foregoing "Affidavit of Notice" was acknowledged before me this b'�day of 20 Z�by `. C1. GUL_2_y10 Iq- RAJ/M G PUBLIC NOTICE RE: 507 W.GILLESPIE STREET-SUBSTAN- PIROPRATEN SS FOR MAJOR DEVELOPMENT WITNESS MY HAND AND OFFICIAL SEAL NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that a public hearing f� l L will be held on Wednesday,February 26,2014,at �� 2V a meeting to begin at 5:00 p.m.before the Aspen (�l.J Historic Preservation Commission,in Council My ommission expires: Chambers,City Hall,130 S.Galena St.,Aspen. HPC will consider an application submitted by owners John Rowland and Sarah Broughton,234 E.Hopkins Ave.,Aspen,CO 81611. The appli- cant requests a Substantial Amendment to a Cer- tificate of Appropriateness for Major Development .• granted in 2007 to develop the vacant lot with a otary Public new residence and Accessory Dwelling Unit. In " addition,the applicant requests a 0'setback vari- ance for a built-in grill on the west property line. j The property is legally described as Lot B of the n P ?r Beck Historic Subdivision,City and Townsite of n Aspen,PID N 2735-121-11-007.For further infor- mation,contact Sara Adams at the City of Aspen .� Community DeverdrIFFnepartment,130 S.Ga- lena St.,Aspen,CO,(970)429-2778,sara.ad- ams@cityofaspen.com. r ams @cityofaspen.com. kCHMENTS AS APPLICABLE: $/Jay Maytln = . Chair,Aspen Historic Preservation Commission ICATION my COIIa1bswn Er*e.3"W&%14 Published in the Aspen Times on February 6,2014. [9925278] rHE POSTED NOTICE (SIGN) • LIST OF THE OWNERS AND GOVERNMENTAL AGENCIES NOTICED i BY MAIL • APPLICANT CERTIFICATION OF MINERAL ESTAE OWNERS NOTICE AS REQUIRED BY C.R.S. §24-65.5-103.3 i o p s r e 1? � Mph J ? Kf ATTACHMENT 6 0 AFFIDAVIT OF PUBLIC NOTICE REQUIRED BY SECTION 26.304.060 (E), ASPEN LAND USE CODE ADDRESS OF PROPERTY: s 4 I L L6 S Pi E ,Aspen, CO SCHEDULED PUBLIC HEARING DATE: 2,6 f_E[i rLVA-1L Y' _,200±1 STATE OF COLORADO ) ss. County of Pitkin ) P_vv ✓" + 51444H e;tZoV4ff7J&W (name, please print) being or representing an Applicant to the City of Aspen, Colorado, hereby personally certify that I have complied with the public notice requirements of Section 26.304.060 (E) of the Aspen Land Use Code in the following manner: Publication of notice: By the publication in the legal notice section of an official paper or a paper of general circulation in the City of Aspen at least fifteen (15) days prior to the public hearing. A copy of the publication is attached hereto. Posting of notice: By posting of notice, which form was obtained from the Community Development Department, which was made of suitable, waterproof materials, which was not less than twenty-two (22) inches wide and twenty-six (26) inches high, and which was composed of letters not less than one inch in height. Said notice was posted at least fifteen(15) days prior to the public hearing and was continuously visible from the 26 day of re6 xv4r21" , 200A,to and including the date and time of the public hearing. A photograph of the posted notice (sign) is attached hereto. Mailing of notice. By the mailing of a notice obtained from the Community Development Department, which contains the information described in Section 26.304.060(E)(2) of the Aspen Land Use Code. At least fifteen(15) days prior to the public hearing, notice was hand delivered or mailed by first class postage prepaid U.S. mail to all owners of property within three hundred (300) feet of the property subject to the development application. The names and addresses of property owners shall be those on the current tax records of Pitkin County as they appeared no more than sixty (60) days prior to the date of the public hearing. A copy of the owners and governmental agencies so noticed is attached hereto. (continued on next page) Aspen Historic Preservation Land Use Application Requirements,Updated:May 29,2007 Rezoning or text amendment. Whenever the official zoning district map is in any way to be changed or amended incidental to or as part of a general revision of this Title, or whenever the text of this Title is to be amended, whether such revision be made by repeal of this Title and enactment of a new land use regulation, or otherwise,the requirement of an accurate survey map or other sufficient legal description of, and the notice to and listing of names and addresses of owners of real property in the area of the proposed change shall be waived. However, the proposed zoning map shall be available for public inspection in the planning agency during all business hours for fifteen (15) days prior to the public hearing on such amendments. Signature The foregoing "Affidavit of Notice"was acknowledged before me this 27 day of 2001_q, by jax kou amd WITNESS MY HAND AND OFFICIAL SEAL Q;pTAq'•.'Q My commission expires: O Z7 / NA A ` ••�° 9 •VBV:GQ,P Notary Public ATTACHMENTS: COPY OF THE PUBLICATION PHOTOGRAPH OF THE POSTED NOTICE(SIGN) LIST OF THE OWNERS AND GOVERNMENTAL AGENCIES NOTICED BYMAIL Aspen Historic Preservation Land Use Application Requirements,Updated:May 29,2007 PUBLIC NOTICE RE: 507 W. GILLESPIE TREET- SUBSTANTIAL AMENDMENT TO CERTIFICATE OF APPROPRIATENESS FOR MAJOR DEVELOPMENT NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that a public hearing will be held on Wednesday, February 26, 2014, at a meeting to begin at 5:00 p.m. before the Aspen Historic Preservation Commission, in Council Chambers, City Hall, 130 S. Galena St., Aspen. HPC will consider an application submitted by owners John Rowland and Sarah Broughton, 234 E. Hopkins Ave., Aspen, CO 81611. The applicant requests a Substantial Amendment to a Certificate of Appropriateness for Major Development granted in 2007 to develop the vacant lot with a new residence and Accessory Dwelling Unit. In addition, the applicant requests a 0' setback variance for a built-in grill on the west property line. The property is legally described as Lot B of the Beck Historic Subdivision, City and Townsite of Aspen, PID #2735-121-11-007. For further information, contact Sara Adams at the City of Aspen Community Development Department, 130 S. Galena St., Aspen, CO, (970) 429-2778, sara.adams @cityofaspen.com. s/Jay Maytin Chair,Aspen Historic Preservation Commission Published in the Aspen Times on February 6, 2014 City of Aspen Account 'us's Avery 10, Ten Vas, ��-,,poss Pc%p-mp Rdo(J" 3 D- i F� [--i L L ol E, -7,iL L E-S F I E L 1,DR T"'i S T F=E 7 Le- PO BOX 10',29 SAL i!,,fi 0177-.E S.il D, 212:-- kl FOURTH ST 840-1 7,11"STA LI''-! �,j 87 �'SPEN5 CO 81611 ray 7 36:1DO-1 ASPE!"!, 00 81611' CHRIST EPISCOPAL r?I°iURC'I-I COLL11,18 CHARLES(E'41 JAJ110E DURAND ! O"'AL Ili DR&SEER NK"E- 536"'Al NORTH! ST -31 kl,!G I L L E S P E-S T Cl K 15 �--EA FAL E'BRAHIMI FRAl-.lCtSr,�,_ 0- �7?'j,��T --�Al E'CEFF STE',IE-1 H DESF-` ;TEL IN1, F,-,UFI.TH- -ST i T FELDEF-' 7". f-,LD TFF',!-Q�T 2ETE A rIA, 9p' "' �'-C�LDE EKfdL`,--E- `NT&�E' I J0 'H00 E, FE r M-� i,P-IF 2�7-! pl�) S, 7C� 25 ;;52'728TH 'H`,,6J ASPEN, C'(:) E-;161H 0 1 ASPEN ODOM JOHN A JR FAM TRUST 50% PETERSON JAMES D&HENSLEY R RICHARDS ANN K ODOM LORRIE FURMAN QPRT 50% PO BOX 1714 1537 28TH ST NW 11490 W 38TH AVE ASPEN, CO 81612 'WASHINGTON, DC 20007 WHEATRIDGE, CO 80033 T 1�fll r '; tJC46 ET IEVEN'l F -1-1-f f::R JAI M SMIALL ALBERT'H jF -S]U'. - - D NORTH ST 7 1 A R 1-:: ,V,10 0 Fy 302 4TH 'z j 7-1 HE DA, MID) 2,:k:"! LB U,HLFELDER NAOMI rANDERAAGI� ERT T flH °�t-,IEST '310 HOOT ENANNY LLC 111 EMERSON ST 4-1341 1 4049 PENNISYl"VAINIA AVE#490 DENVER, CO 802-1183792- '205 S MILL ST#226 K'AU]SAS 07-1'f 7�1)00 64,11'i ASPEN, CO 845611 c-tiquettes fadles�l peh-r plaplia'a 6 N'mcfnuya af in"le Sens da Litillsez le gabarit AVEW-�rt' 6q)Vt 51 ' i,6vaffler le ratio r-orp-uqr:?71,1 s 1800-60411VERY l6 a P N d '� a. �j 7� r� ��!! r DIY ''"'at�''E �� ,► .sue @;Y� ��'I�r w • ;! ,� f `rpr n r•� i�Ili �u- t Awl i xorl MEMORANDUM TO: Aspen Historic Preservation Commission FROM: Sara Adams, Senior Planner THRU: Amy Guthrie, Historic Preservation Officer RE: 507 Gillespie Street- Substantial Amendment to Approved Development Order- Public Hearing DATE: February 26, 2014 SUMMARY: 507 Gillespie Street is a vacant lot, Lot B, that was the product of a historic landmark lot split in 2003. The historic landmark is located on Lot A and is pictured below. In 2007, the property received a Certificate of Appropriateness for the development of a single family residence and a detached garage with a subgrade ADU (HPC Resolutions #10 of 2007 and #35 of 2007). The vested rights were extended by City Council in 2010 for an additional 3 years via Resolution 88, Series of 2010. The vested rights are set to expire on September 9, 2013. Due to the vested rights, the project is subject to the Land Use Code in place when the project was first submitted. The property changed hands and the new owners received approval to amend the Certificate of Appropriateness by HPC in June 2013. The 2013 amendment included changing the roof forms, materials and architectural details, and a floor area reduction by about 500 square feet with the intention to create 2 Transferrable Development Rights (TDRs). In 2013 the applicant also received a setback variance for an eave overhang. The applicant is interested in amending the design further by changing eaves, windows, materials, and the roof form of the garage/ADU. A 0' setback variance is requested for a built in grill along the west property line. Image 1:515 Gillespie St.The historic landmark prior to the Image 2:Map of subject property. Lot A is at left and Lot B construction of a contemporary rear addition. is at right. The Music Tent parking lot is across the street. 1 Staff finds that the project meets the applicable HPC design guidelines and recommends approval with conditions. Staff finds that the review criteria for a setback variance are not met and recommends denial. APPLICANT: John Rowland and Sarah Broughton, 1001 E. Cooper Ave., #8, Aspen Colorado. PARCEL ID: 2735-121-11-007 ADDRESS: 507 Gillespie St., Lot B of the Beck Historic Lot Split, City and Townsite of Aspen, Colorado. ZONING: R-6, Medium Density Residential. MAJOR DEVELOPMENT- SUBSTANTIAL AMENDMENT The HPC will review the application, the staff analysis report and the evidence presented at the hearing to determine the project's conformance with the City of Aspen Historic Preservation Design Guidelines. The HPC may approve, disapprove, approve with conditions or continue the application to obtain additional information necessary to make a decision to approve or deny. The staff memo focuses on the areas proposed to change. Site Plan/Landscape: The interior landscape, between the main house and the garage, is not visible to the public which allows greater flexibility for a contemporary landscape. A built in grill is proposed in the east yard setback and requires a variance (discussed below). There are two lightwells proposed- one in the west sideyard setback for the ADU and one in the east sideyard setback for the primary residence. These lightwells must be the minimum size required by building code for egress to be allowed to infringe in the setback. The Si Johnson Ditch runs through the front yard and along the west property line and is proposed to be maintained in accordance with Guideline 1.17. Any planting or construction (the fence) within the ditch easement requires Utilities Department approval. 1.10 Preserve historic elements of the yard to provide an appropriate context for historic structures. ❑ The front yard should be maintained in a traditional manner, with planting material and sod, and not covered with paving, for example. 1.17 Maintain historic irrigation ditches as an integral component of the streetscape. The character of an irrigation ditch should be maintained. ❑ It is inappropriate to use an irrigation ditch as a planting bed, or to fill it with another material. ❑ Ditches cannot by culverted except where crossed by a walkway or driveway, and a culvert must be approved by the Parks Department. 2 Front (north) elevation: Architectural sheet A0.4.2 shows a comparison of the approved elevation to the proposed front elevation. The changes include a simplified entrance and front porch, more contemporary window shapes, removal of the chimney and flue, and removal of the prominent cave. A zero cave detail is proposed. Staff is supportive of the proposed architectural changes to the front fagade. The proposed building relates to the historic resource and is a product of its own time. Staff finds that the design guidelines below are met. East, west and rear (south) elevations: The applicant proposes window and slight material changes to the sides and rear elevations. Staff finds that the proposed changes are minor and consistent with the guidelines below. 11.2 In a residential context, clearly define the primary entrance to a new building by using a front porch. ❑ The front porch should be "functional," in that it is used as a means of access to the entry. ❑ A new porch should be similar in size and shape to those seen traditionally. ❑ In some cases, the front door itself may be positioned perpendicular to the street; nonetheless, the entry should still be clearly defined with a walkway and porch that orients to the street. 11.4 Design a front elevation to be similar in scale to the historic building. ❑ The primary plane of the front should not appear taller than the historic structure. ❑ The front should include a one-story element, such as a porch. 11.9 Use building components that are similar in size and shape to those of the historic property. ❑ These include windows, doors and porches. u Overall, details should be modest in character. Garage/ ADU Roof Form: The applicant proposes to simplifies the roof form of the garage/ADU building by using a more traditional gable roof for the garage/ADU. The cross gable is replaced with a traditional gable form. A zero cave detail is proposed. Changing the complexity of the roof form on the ADU building is more consistent with the simplified utilitarian form of accessory alley buildings. The cross gable added more architectural interest, however both the approved and proposed buildings meet the design guidelines below: 11.5 Use building forms that are similar to those of the historic property. ❑ They should not overwhelm the original in scale. 11.6 Use roof forms that are similar to those seen traditionally in the block. ❑ Sloping roofs such as gable and hip roofs are appropriate for primary roof forms. ❑ Flat roofs should be used only in areas where it is appropriate to the context. ❑ On a residential structure, cave depths should be similar to those seen traditionally in the context. ❑ Exotic building and roof forms that would detract from the visual continuity of the street are discouraged. These include geodesic domes and A-frames. 3 The garage doors are required to appear as single stall doors to meet the residential design standards. It is appropriate for this to be handled at the staff and monitor level. SETBACK VARIANCE: The applicant requests a west sideyard setback variance of 0' for a built in grill. Built in grills that are over 30" are not permitted in setbacks. The criteria for granting setback variances, per Section 26.415.110.13 of the Municipal Code are as follows: In granting a variance, the HPC must make a finding that such a variance: a. Is similar to the pattern, features and character of the historic property or district; and/or b. Enhances or mitigates an adverse impact to the historic significance or architectural character of the historic property, an adjoining designated historic property or historic district. Staff Response: Staff is not supportive of the requested setback variance. The property is a vacant lot with ample opportunity to meet dimensional requirements. Staff finds that the criteria are not met and recommends denial. DECISION MAKING OPTIONS: The HPC may: • approve the application, • approve the application with conditions, • disapprove the application, or • continue the application to a date certain to obtain additional information necessary to make a decision to approve or deny. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that HPC approve the Substantial Amendment to Resolution #10 and #35, Series of 2007, and Resolution #21, Series of 2013 for the property located at 507 Gillespie Street with the following conditions: 1. Setback Variance: a. The west side yard setback variance for the built in grill is denied. b. All lightwells in the setbacks must meet the Land Use Code exception for lightwells in setbacks. 2. Garage doors shall meet the residential design standard 26.410.040.C.1 and appear as single stall doors for review and approval by staff and monitor. 3. All approvals and conditions granted during Conceptual (Resolution #10, Series of 2007) and Final (Resolution #35 Series of 2007) Review, and Substantial Amendment Resolution # 21 Series of 2013 are valid, with the exception of the approvals specified herein. 4 4. There shall be no deviations from the exterior elevations as approved without first being reviewed and approved by HPC staff and monitor, or the full board. Resolution# , Series of 2014. Exhibits: A. Design Guidelines B. HPC Resolution #21, Series of 2013 (Substantial Amendment Approval) C. Application 5 RESOLUTION OF THE ASPEN HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION (HPC) APPROVING A SUBSTANTIAL AMENDMENT FOR MAJOR DEVELOPMENT FOR THE PROPERTY LOCATED AT LOT B OF THE BECK HISTORIC LOT SPLIT, 507 GILLESPIE STREET, CITY AND TOWNSITE OF ASPEN, COLORADO RESOLUTION NO. _, SERIES OF 2014 PARCEL ID: 2735-121-11-007 WHEREAS, the applicant, John Rowland and Sarah Broughton, requested a Substantial Amendment to HPC Resolution #10, Series of 2007 and HPC Resolution 435, Series of 2007, for Major Development for 507 Gillespie Street, Lot B of the Beck Historic Lot Split, City and Townsite of Aspen, Colorado; and WHEREAS, Section 26.415.070 of the Municipal Code states that "no building or structure shall be erected, constructed, enlarged, altered, repaired, relocated or improved involving a designated historic property or district until plans or sufficient information have been submitted to the Community Development Director and approved in accordance with the procedures established for their review;" and WHEREAS, at their regular meeting on March 28, 2007, the HPC considered the application, found the application was consistent with the review standards and the City of Aspen Historic Preservation Design Guidelines, and approved Resolution #10 of 2007 granting Conceptual Approval for Major Development and Variances by a vote of 3 —0; and WHEREAS, at their regular meeting on August 22, 2007 the HPC considered the application, found the application was consistent with the review standards and the City of Aspen Historic Preservation Design Guidelines, and approved Resolution #35 of 2007 granting Final Approval for Major Development by a vote of 3 —0; and WHEREAS, at their regular meeting on October 25, 2010 the Aspen City Council considered an application for a 3 year extension of vested rights and approved Resolution 488 of 2010 granting an extension of vested rights to September 9, 2013; and WHEREAS, at their-regular meeting on June 12,-2013 the-HPC -considered the application, - found the application was consistent with the review standards and the City of Aspen Historic Preservation Design Guidelines, and approved Resolution #21 of 2013 granting a Substantial Amendment to the Development Order by a vote of 6—0; and WHEREAS, Section 26.415.070.E.2 of the Municipal Code states that " all changes to approved plans that materially modify the location, size, shape, materials, design, detailing or appearance of the building elements as originally depicted must be approved by the HPC as a substantial amendment; and 507 Gillespie— Substantial Amendment HPC Resolution #_, 2014 Page 1 of 2 WHEREAS, the HPC will review the application, the staff analysis report and the evidence presented at the hearing to determine the project's conformance with the City of Aspen Historic Preservation Design Guidelines. The HPC may approve, disapprove, approve with conditions or continue the application to obtain additional information necessary to make a decision to approve or deny; and WHEREAS, Sara Adams, in her staff report dated February 26, 2013, performed an analysis of the application based on the standards, found that the review standards and the "City of Aspen Historic Preservation Design Guidelines were met, and recommended approval, and found the review standards for a setback variance were not met and recommended denial; and WHEREAS, at their regular meeting on February 26, 2013, the Historic Preservation Commission considered the application, found the application was consistent with the review standards and "City of Aspen Historic Preservation Design Guidelines", and approved the substantial amendment application with conditions by a vote of NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED: HPC grants approval for a Substantial Amendment to Resolution 410 and #35, Series of 2007, and Resolution #21, Series of 2013 for the property located at 507 Gillespie Street with the following conditions: 1. Setback Variance: a. The west side yard setback variance for the built in grill is denied. b. All lightwells in the setbacks must meet the Land Use Code exception for lightwells in setbacks. 2. Garage doors shall meet the residential design standard 26.410.040.C.1 and appear as single stall doors for review and approval by staff and monitor. 3. All approvals and conditions granted during Conceptual (Resolution #10, Series of 2007) and Final (Resolution #35 Series of 2007) Review, and Substantial Amendment Resolution # 21 Series of 2013 are valid, with the exception of the approvals specified herein. 4. There shall be no deviations from the exterior elevations as approved without first being reviewed and approved by HPC staff and monitor, or the full board. APPROVED BY THE COMMISSION at its regular meeting on the 26th day of February 2014. Jay Maytin, Chair Approved as to Form: Debbie Quinn, Assistant City Attorney ATTEST: Kathy Strickland, Chief Deputy Clerk Exhibit A: Approved elevations and site plan 507 Gillespie— Substantial Amendment HPC Resolution #_, 2014 Page 2 of 2 Exhibit A: Relevant Historic Preservation Design Guidelines for 507 Gillespie 1.4 New fence components should be similar in scale with those seen traditionally. ❑ Fence columns or piers should be proportional to the fence segment. 1.5 A side yard fence which extends between two homes should be set back from the street-facing facade. ❑ This setback should be significant enough to provide a sense of open space between homes. 1.6 Replacement or new fencing between side yards and along the alley should be compatible with the historic context. ❑ A side yard fence is usually taller than its front yard counterpart. It also is less transparent. A side yard fence may reach heights taller than front yard fences (up to six feet), but should incorporate transparent elements to minimize the possible visual impacts. ❑ Consider staggering the fence boards on either side of the fence rail. This will give the appearance of a solid plank fence when seen head on. ❑ Also consider using lattice, or other transparent detailing, on the upper portions of the fence. 1.9 Maintain the established progression of public-to-private spaces when considering a rehabilitation project. ❑ This includes a sequence of experiences, beginning with the "public" sidewalk, proceeding along a "semi-public" walkway, to a "semi-private" porch or entry feature and ending in the "private" spaces beyond. ❑ Provide a walkway running perpendicular from the street to the front entry. Meandering walkways are discouraged, except where it is needed to avoid a tree. ❑ Use paving materials that are similar to those used historically for the building style. Concrete, wood or sandstone may be appropriate for certain building styles. 1.16 Preserve historically significant landscape designs and features. ❑ This includes the arrangement of trees, shrubs, plant beds, irrigation ditches and sidewalks in the public right-of-way. 1.17 Maintain historic irrigation ditches as an integral component of the streetscape. The character of an irrigation ditch should be maintained. ❑ It is inappropriate to use an irrigation ditch as a planting bed, or to fill it with another material. ❑ Ditches cannot by culverted except where crossed by a walkway or driveway, and a culvert must be approved by the Parks Department. 11.1 Orient the primary entrance of a new building to the street. ❑ The building should be arranged parallel to the lot lines, maintaining the traditional grid pattern of the site. 11.2 In a residential context, clearly define the primary entrance to a new building by using a front porch. ❑ The front porch should be "functional," in that it is used as a means of access to the entry. 6 ❑ A new porch should be similar in size and shape to those seen traditionally. ❑ In some cases, the front door itself may be positioned perpendicular to the street; nonetheless, the entry should still be clearly defined with a walkway and porch that orients to the street. 11.3 Construct a new building to appear similar in scale with the historic buildings on the parcel. ❑ Subdivide larger masses into smaller "modules" that are similar in size to the historic buildings on the original site. 11.4 Design a front elevation to be similar in scale to the historic building. ❑ The primary plane of the front should not appear taller than the historic structure. ❑ The front should include a one-story element, such as a porch. 11.5 Use building forms that are similar to those of the historic property. ❑ They should not overwhelm the original in scale. 11.6 Use roof forms that are similar to those seen traditionally in the block. ❑ Sloping roofs such as gable and hip roofs are appropriate for primary roof forms. ❑ Flat roofs should be used only in areas where it is appropriate to the context. ❑ On a residential structure, eave depths should be similar to those seen traditionally in the context. ❑ Exotic building and roof forms that would detract from the visual continuity of the street are discouraged. These include geodesic domes and A-frames. 11.7 Roof materials should appear similar in scale and texture to those used traditionally. ❑ Roof materials should have a matte, non-reflective finish. 11.8 Use building materials that contribute to a traditional sense of human scale. ❑ Materials that appear similar in scale and finish to those used historically on the site are encouraged. ❑ Use of highly reflective materials is discouraged. 11.9 Use building components that are similar in size and shape to those of the historic property. ❑ These include windows, doors and porches. ❑ Overall, details should be modest in character. 11.10 The imitation of older historic styles is discouraged. ❑ This blurs the distinction between old and new buildings. ❑ Highly complex and ornately detailed revival styles that were not a part of Aspen's history are especially discouraged on historic sites. 7 RECEPTION#: E, 06/21/2013 at 10:21:27 AM, 1 OF 32, R $166.00 Doc Code RESOLUTION Janice K. Vos Caudill, Pitkin County, CO RESOLUTION OF THE ASPEN HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION (HPC) APPROVING A SUBSTANTIAL AMENDMENT FOR MAJOR DEVELOPMENT FOR THE PROPERTY LOCATED AT LOT B OF THE BECK HISTORIC LOT SPLIT, 507 GILLESPIE STREET,CITY AND TOWNSITE OF ASPEN, COLORADO RESOLUTION NO. 21, SERIES OF 2013 PARCEL ID: 2735-121-11-007 WHEREAS, the applicant, John Rowland and Sarah Broughton, requested a Substantial Amendment to HPC Resolution #10, Series of 2007 and HPC Resolution #35, Series of 2007, for Major Development for 507 Gillespie Street, Lot B of the Beck Historic Lot Split, City and Townsite of Aspen, Colorado; and WHEREAS, Section 26.415.070 of the Municipal Code states that "no building or structure shall be erected, constructed, enlarged, altered, repaired, relocated or improved involving a designated historic property or district until plans or sufficient information have been submitted to the Community Development Director and approved in accordance with the procedures established for their review;"and WHEREAS, at their regular meeting on March 28, 2007, the HPC considered the application, found the application was consistent with the review standards and the City of Aspen Historic Preservation Design Guidelines, and approved Resolution 410 of 2007 granting Conceptual Approval for Major Development and Variances by a vote of 3 —0; and WHEREAS, at their regular meeting on August 22, 2007 the HPC considered the application, found the application was consistent with the review standards and the City of Aspen Historic Preservation Design Guidelines, and approved Resolution 435 of 2007 granting Final Approval for Major Development by a vote of 3 —0; and WHEREAS, at their regular meeting on October 25, 2010 the Aspen City Council considered an application for a 3 year extension of vested rights and approved Resolution #88 of 2010 granting an extension of vested rights to September 9, 2013; and WHEREAS, Section 26.415.070.E.2 of the Municipal Code states that " all changes to approved plans that materially modify the location, size, shape, materials, design, detailing or appearance of the building elements as originally depicted must be approved by the HPC as a substantial amendment; and WHEREAS, the HPC will review the application, the staff analysis report and the evidence presented at the hearing to determine the project's conformance with the City of Aspen Historic Preservation Design Guidelines. The HPC may approve, disapprove, approve with conditions or continue the application to obtain additional information necessary to make a decision to approve or deny; and 507 Gillespie—Substantial Amendment HPC Resolution # 21, 2013 Page 1 of 3 WHEREAS, Sara Adams, in her staff report dated June 12, 2013, performed an analysis of the application based on the standards, found that the review standards and the "City of Aspen Historic Preservation Design Guidelines were met, and recommended approval, and found the review standards for a setback variance were not met and recommended denial; and WHEREAS, at their regular meeting on June 12, 2013, the Historic Preservation Commission considered the application, found the application was consistent with the review standards and "City of Aspen Historic Preservation Design Guidelines", and found that the setback variance was consistent with the review standards, and approved the application by a vote of six to zero (6 —0). NOW,THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED: HPC grants approval for a Substantial Amendment to Resolution #10, Series of 2007 and Resolution #35, Series of 2007 for the property located at 507 Gillespie Street with the following conditions: 1. Landscape: a. All planting in the right of way is subject to Parks Department review and approval. b. Landscaping in the public right of way will be subject to landscaping in the ROW requirements. c. The perennial bed located in the right of way is not approved. d. An encroachment license is required prior to building permit issuance for the lightwell that is located within the ditch easement on the west elevation. e. All planting and construction in the ditch easement is subject to Utilities Department review and approval. 2. Height: A height of about 23 ft. 4 in. is approved as presented. 3. Roof Forms/Massing: a. The roof overhang of the east side of the front porch shall be reduced a minimum of 18" for review and approval by Staff and monitor. 4. Materials: a. The materials are approved as presented. b. The solar panels shall match the pitch of the roof they are located. The configuration and number of panels shall be approved by Staff and monitor. 5. Setback Variance: a. The west side yard setback variance of 18" is granted. 6. All approvals and conditions granted during Conceptual (Resolution #10, Series of 2007) and Final (Resolution #35 Series of 2007) Review are valid, with the exception of the approvals specified herein. 7. There shall be no deviations from the exterior elevations as approved without first being reviewed and approved by HPC staff and monitor, or the full board. 507 Gillespie— Substantial Amendment HPC Resolution # 21, 2013 Page 2 of 3 APPROVED BY THE COMMISSION at its regular meeting on the 12th ay June 2013. ws r McLeod, Vice Chair Ap roved as to Form: Debbie Quinn, Assistant City Attorney ATTEST: athy Strickland, Chief Deputy Clerk Exhibit A: Approved elevations and site plan Exhibit B: 2006 Land Use Code—Section 26.575.020. Calculations and Measurements 507 Gillespie—Substantial Amendment HPC Resolution # 21, 2013 Page 3 of 3 p0 L COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT Agreement to Pay A pp lication Fees tKMVVED _iAN 2 7 2014 Anagreement between the City of Aspen ("City") and Property 06./ Phone No.: S��- —90 CITY OF ASPEN Owner("I"): �� Iv 0VdLAA1.8 Email: �ok•�rvw(anc(brov LOPMEN Address of 507 Gillespie St. Billing 234 E, If.dFK S 40,-_ . Property: Address: (subject of (send bills here) �f��N i CO 81611 application) I understand that the City has adopted, via Ordinance No. , Series of 2011, review fees for Land Use applications and the payment of these fees is a condition precedent to determining application completeness. I understand that as the property owner that I am responsible for paying all fees for this development application. For flat fees and referral fees: I agree to pay the following fees for the services indicated. I understand that these flat fees are non-refundable. 0 Select Dept 0 Select Dept $, flat fee for $_ flat fee for_ $ 0 flat fee for Select Dept $ 0 flat fee for Select Review For deposit cases only: The City and I understand that because of the size, nature or scope of the proposed project, it is not possible at this time to know the full extent or total costs involved in processing the application. I understand that additional costs over and above the deposit may accrue. I understand and agree that it is impracticable for City staff to complete processing, review, and presentation of sufficient information to enable legally required findings to be made for project consideration, unless invoices are paid in full. The City and I understand and agree that invoices mailed by the City to the above listed billing address and not returned to the City shall be considered by the City as being received by me. I agree to remit payment within 30 days of presentation of an invoice by the City for such services. I have read, understood, and agree to the Land Use Review Fee Policy including consequences for non-payment. I agree to pay the following initial deposit amounts for the specified hours of staff time. I understand that payment of a deposit does not render an application complete or compliant with approval criteria. If actual recorded costs exceed the initial deposit, I agree to pay additional monthly billings to the City to reimburse the City for the processing of my application at the hourly rates hereinafter stated. $ 1 ,950 deposit for 6 hours of Community Development Department staff time. Additional time above the deposit amount will be billed at $325 per hour. $ deposit for hours of Engineering Department staff time. Additional time above the deposit amount will be billed at$265 per hour. City of Aspen: Property Owner: i 4v4j) Chris Bendon Community Development Director Name: -106V 4W1,*A16 City Use: 1950 Title: 4WN6124 Ay-l0 PAt(A1C_1rtfu5 of Fees Due: $ Received:$ JI_W� � 5W4 T04 Af .fLV & 0-5090 92 COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT Land Use Review Fee Policy The City of Aspen has established a review fee policy for the processing of land use applications. A flat fee or deposit is collected for land use applications based on the type of application submitted. A flat fee is collected by Community Development for applications which normally take a minimal and predictable amount of staff time to process. Review fees for other City departments reviewing the application (referral departments) will also be collected when necessary. Flat fees are cumulative — meaning an application with multiple flat fees must pay the sum of those flat fees. Flat fees are not refundable. A review fee deposit is collected by Community Development when more extensive staff review is required. Actual staff time spent will be charged against the deposit. Various City staff may also charge their time spent on the case in addition to the case planner. Deposit amounts may be reduced if, in the opinion of the Community Development Director, the project is expected to take significantly less time to process than the deposit indicates. A determination on the deposit amount shall be made during the pre-application conference by the case planner. Hourly billing shall still apply. All applications must include an Agreement to Pay Application Fees. One payment including the deposit for Planning and referral agency fees must be submitted with each land use application, made payable to the City of Aspen. Applications will not be accepted for processing without the required application fee. The Community Development Department shall keep an accurate record of the actual time required for the processing of a land use application requiring a deposit. The City can provide a summary report of fees due at the applicant's request. The applicant will be billed for the additional costs incurred by the City when the processing of an application by the Community Development Department takes more time or expense than is covered by the deposit. Any direct costs attributable to a project review shall be billed to the applicant with no additional administrative charge. In the event the processing of an application takes less time than provided for by the deposit, the department shall refund the unused portion of the deposited fee to the applicant. Fees shall be due regardless of whether an applicant receives approval. Unless otherwise combined by the Director for simplicity of billing, all applications for conceptual, final, and recordation of approval documents shall be handled as individual cases for the purposes of billing. Upon conceptual approval all billing shall be reconciled and all past due invoices shall be paid prior to the Director accepting an application for final review. Final review shall require a new deposit at the rate in effect at the time of final application submission. Upon final approval all billing shall again be reconciled prior to the Director accepting an application for review of technical documents for recordation. The Community Development Director may cease processing of a land use application for which an unpaid invoice is 30 or more days past due. Unpaid invoices of 90 or more days past due may be assessed a late fee of 1.75% per month. An unpaid invoice of 120 days or more may be subject to additional actions as may be assigned by the Municipal Court Judge. All payment information is public domain. All invoices shall be paid prior to issuance of a Development Order or recordation of development agreements and plats. The City will not accept a building permit for a property until all invoices are paid in full. For permits already accepted, an unpaid invoice of 90 or more days may result in cessation of building permit processing or issuance of a stop work order until full payment is made. The property owner of record is the party responsible for payment of all costs associated with a land use application for the property. Any secondary agreement between a property owner and an applicant representing the owner(e.g. a contract purchaser) regarding payment of fees is solely between those private parties. 2013 �m asper 231 c hcpkws av^_, aspon co 81611 - t 970 54,1 9006 A denvcr 830 bl aK �t stc 200,dcovc co 80202' - t 303 308 13;3 visit wwN.rewlandbrougF,ton.com rowland+broughton architecture I urban dGSign/mtcnor dcsign LETTER 26 February 2014 Sara Adams JAN 2 7 ?na Senior Planner of Community Development City Hall A CITY ot- 130 S. Galena Street " # i1 Aspen, CO 81611 PROJECT.- 507 Gillespie SUBJECT.- Applicant Authorization CC: N/A Dear Sara, This letter acts as the applicant authorization for the 507 Gillespie project. We are the owners of this property and will be representing ourselves through the modifications to the approved Substantial Amendment for Major Development (Resolution No. 21, Series of 2013). Property: 507 W. Gillespie Street Aspen, CO 81611 (Parcel ID#273512111007) Applicant and Representative: John Rowland, AIA and Sarah Broughton, AIA Rowland+Broughton Architecture and Urban Design 234 E. Hopkins Street Aspen, CO 81611 (970) 544-9006 office (970) 544-3473 fax (970) 379-9910 John's cell (970) 379-0111 Sarah's cell Signed, 4 APO «� John Rowland, AIA Sarah Broughton, AIA Page 1 of 1 ` - - . rprc, zm c a.c, ^,pc`*,n1a1/ ' '9/n5A^9oou J," ys`Wa^cct roo, oc'c�xom7 ' xn30m rz w,w.r c~|",it:,uue a,zo-n � �` �fOD FoVV/|aDuf��rDU�/ / � ~+x�cx/"�"" "to"o jF*a" MEMORANDUM Project: 5O7 {�iUeepia -' |�N � 7 2O�� Subject: M��c�� Amendment "^'` � ~' ' �� 0- �� Date: 26 February 2014 ~. . . ..r '`=` "-`~ ~��UNO��FV�[�p��| To: |�8n8 /\danls (Senior P|@nne� ��xof/\epen) ~ - From: John Rowland, /\LA Cc: Background: In 2001, a vacant lot was created from a two lot subdivision known as the Beck Historic Landmark Lot Split, referred hooe5U7 Gillespie Lot B. |tis located cd5U7Ni Gillespie Street in the R-G Residential Zone District. In 2007, HIPC granted approval for a single-family residence and detached garage with an ADU below (HPC Resolution No. 35. Series of2UO7). The vested rights for the 2OO7 approvals were extended until 0September 2813 (City Council Resolution No. 88of2O1U). In 2013, HPC granted the applicants a Substantial Amendment for Major Development(HIPC Resolution No. 21, Series uf2O13). The amendment was for a single-family house with a detached garage and with an ADU below, in which the applicants extinguished 500SF from the original allowable floor area through the TDR process. The buildings were traditional in form with modern detailing. The main house design was respectful and subservient to the historic house to the west and took design cues from the historic miner's cabins found in the neighborhood. The amendment was approved 8-O. Requested Modification: The applicants were intending on starting construction in the fall of 2013, but delays with permitting and financing resulted in postponing construction until the spring of2O14. These circumstances may have been fortuitous as the applicants had the opportunity to rent the historic home to the west. Living next ho the property really provided the applicants with a greater sense of the contextual surroundings. While the size and form of the design did not change, the applicants noticed details that would make the project better and complement the historic house even more. The enclosed drawings illustrate the modified details the applicants are requesting as compared to the design that was approved in2U13 Overall, these modifications are still inspired by traditional vernacular architecture of the neighborhood, but rather bring a greater sense of clarity and elegance. The fenestration ismore respectful to the historic house with respect to quantity of glazing on the side elevations while adding a few corner windows to not only capture the views better, but to also allow further distinguished it from the historic house. The zero eavo detail allows the mass and form tobe more clean and precise. Stripping the volume down to its bare essence achieves a better proportional relationship with the historic house. Removing the chimneys and mechanical flues also bring greater clarity to the purity of the traditional gable form. Most likely the biggest modification is at the garage vn|ume, although the experience from the o||ay remains intact. As in the previously approved design, the alley elevation is still viewed in the same manner. Keeping both the house and garage forms in the same vocabulary was important, so the garage wanted to be just as simple and clear, This simplicity of form nods hu the alley vernacular ofAspen. Best regards, John;n d Page 1 of aspen 234 e ave,aspen ao 8'61 910 X49 901,6 uer ,e ?830�.. si ste 200,c e cc 8CKC r t 303.308'313 visit wtuE .nw-!andE° uq"rt<-_c,�m rowland+broughton area tecturc urL ar.dcsic�,,wtccva!den pr TRANSMITTAL Project: 507 Gillespie Subject: Modifications to the Approved Amendment (6/12/13) Date: 26 February 2014 To: Sara Adams (Senior Planner, City of Aspen) From: John Rowland, AIA Via: Personal Delivery Attachments: See Below If you do not receive all attachments listed above please call immediately. Dear Sara, Please find enclosed: • (1) Memorandom • (1) 24"x36" Drawing Set— Illustrating Requested Modification to Approved Amendment • (10) 11"x17" Drawing Set— Illustrating Requested Modification to Approved Amendment Best regards, John Row! d, AI Page 1 of 1