HomeMy WebLinkAboutLand Use Case.36 Bus Barn Ln.A055-01- A055-01
Moore PUD Amendment- Height of
0036 Bus Barn Lane
Scq-,,�,uL-U 5/aoo3
V.
U
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT
130 South Galena Street
Aspen, Colorado 81611
(970) 920-5090
City of Aspen
Land Use:
1041 Deposit
1042 Flat Fee
1043 HPC
1046 Zoning and Sign
Referral Fees:
1163 City Engineer
1205 Environmental Health
1190 Housing
Building Fees:
1071
Board of Appeals
1072
Building Permit
1073
Electrical Permit
1074
Energy Code Review
1075
Mechanical Permit
1076
Plan Check
1077
Plumbing Permit
1078
Reinspection
1079
Aspen Fire
Other Fees:
1006
Copy
1165
Remp Fee
P 1302
GIS Maps
1303
GIS Fee
c
1481
Housing Cash in Lieu
1383
Open Space Cash in Lieu
1383
Park Dedication
1468
Parking Cash in Lieu
Performance Deposit
1268
Public Right-of-way
1 164
School District Land Ded.
TOTAL
NAME: -
ADDRESS/ PROJECT: j)" , 4 /
PHONE:
CHECK#
CASE/PERMIT#:, # OF COPIES: h
DATE: INITIAL: S
0
CASE NUMBER
PARCEL ID #
CASE NAME
PROJECT ADDRESS
PLANNER
CASE TYPE
OWNER/APPLICANT
REPRESENTATIVE
DATE OF FINAL ACTION
CITY COUNCIL ACTION
PZ ACTION
ADMIN ACTION
BOA ACTION
DATE CLOSED
BY
A055-01
2735-114-02027
Moore PUD Amendment-- Height Requirement-36 Bus Bar
0036 Bus Barn Lane
Steve Clay
PUD Amendment
Zoom Flume LLC.
Glenn Horn
7/24/01
Reso. 34-2001
Approved
9/4/01
J. Lindt
PARCEL ID: 2735-114-02027 DATE RCVD , 5/18/01 CASE N A055
CASE NAME: Moore PUD Amendment— Height Requirement-36 Bus Barn PLNR:
PROJ ADDR: 0036 Bus Barn Lane CASE TYP: PUD Amendment STEPS:
OWN/APP: Zoom Flume LLC. A�215S
CIS/Z: PH
REP: Glenn Horn ADarchSt., St C/S/Z: Aspen/CO/81611 PHN 925-6587
FEES DUE: 1205 FEES RCVD 1205 STAT:
WNW REF: BY
MTG DATE REV BODY PH ; NOTICE
DATE OF FINAL AC
CITY COUNCIL:
REMARKS
PZ:
BOA:
t CLOSED: f tt0( BY: K DRAC:
PLAT SUBMITD: r PLAT (BK,PG):f ADMIN
RESOLUTION NO.34 SERIES OF 2001
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF ASPEN PLANNING AND ZONING
COMMISSION APPROVING A PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT (PUD)
AMENDMENT TO AMEND ARTICLE VII, SECTION VII OF THE MOORE
FAMILY PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT GUIDE (PUD GUIDE) TO
CHANGE THE HEIGHT LIMITATION ALLOWING A MAXIMUM HEIGHT
OF 17 FEET ONLY PERTAINING TO LOT 27E
Parcel ID: 2735-013-02-004
WHEREAS, the Community Development Department received an application
from the Applicant, Zoom Flume LLC, represented Davis Horn Inc, requesting a Planned
Unit Development (PUD) amendment to amend Article VII, Section VII of the Moore
Family Planned Unit Development Guide (PUD Guide) to change the height limitation
allowing a maximum height of 17 feet only pertaining to lot 27e; and
WHEREAS, pursuant to Sections 26,445, the Planning and Zoning Commission
may approve an amendment to an approved Planned Unit Development, during a duly
noticed public hearing, comments form the general public, a recommendation from the
Community Development Staff, and recommendations from relevant referral agencies;
WHEREAS, upon review of the application and the applicable Land Use Code
standards, the Community Development Department recommends approval for a Planned
Unit Development amendment; and
WHEREAS, the Aspen Planning and Zoning Commission has reviewed and
considered the development proposal under the applicable provisions of the Municipal Code
as identified herein, has reviewed and considered the recommendation of the Community
Development Director, and has taken and considered public comment at a duly noticed
public hearing conducted on July 24, 2001; and
WHEREAS, the City of Aspen Planning and Zoning Commission finds that the
development proposal meets or exceeds all applicable development standards and that the
approval of the development proposal is consistent with the goals and elements of the Aspen
Area Community Plan; and,
WHEREAS, the Planning and Zoning Commission approved, by a vote of five to
one (5,1) for the Planned Unit Development amendment; and,
WHEREAS, the City of Aspen Planning and Zoning Commission finds that this
Resolution furthers and is necessary for the promotion of public health, safety, and welfare.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE PLANNING AND ZONING
COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF ASPEN, COLORADO ON THE 241h DAY OF
DULY, 2001, THAT:
Section 1
Pursuant to the procedures and standards set forth in Title 26 of the Aspen Municipal
Code, the amendment to the Moore Family PUD Guide for the purpose of allowing a
change in height of Lot 27e, Block A is approved with the following conditions:
1. The amendment to the Moore Family PUD Guide to change the height limitation
allowing a maximum height of 17 feet is specifically and only for Lot 27e.
2. That the applicant shall record with the Pitkin County Clerk and Recorder this
Resolution and a document approved by the Community Development
Department reflecting the special change to the Moore Family PUD Guide.
Certinn 2
All material representations and commitments made by the applicant pursuant to the
development proposal approvals as herein awarded, whether in public hearing or
documentation presented before the Planning and Zoning Commission or City Council, are
hereby incorporated in such plan development approvals and the same shall be complied
with as if fully set forth herein, unless amended by an authorized entity.
Certinn I
If any section, subsection, sentence, clause, phrase, or portion of this Resolution is for any
reason held invalid or unconstitutional in a court of competent jurisdiction, such portion
shall be deemed a separate, distinct and independent provision and shall not affect the
validity of the remaining portions thereof.
Approved by the Commission at its regular meeting on July 24th, 2001.
APPROVED AS TO FORM: PLANNING AND ZONING
COMMISSION:
City Attorney
ATTEST:
Jackie Lothian, Deputy City Clerk
Jasmine Tygre, Chair
MEMORANDUM
To: Aspen Planning and Zoning Commission
TIIRU: Julie Ann Woods, Community Development Director
Joyce Ohlson, Deputy Director j f p
FROM: Steve Clay, Planner qv
RE: Moore Planned Unit Development Amendment — A Change in
"Height Limitations"
DATE: July 17, 2001
APPLICANT: Zoom Flume LLC.
REPRESENTATIVE: Davis Horn INC.
PARCEL ID: 2735-114-0207
ADDRESS: 0036 Bus Barn Lane
ZONING: RI PD
CURRENT LAND USE: Single Family
Residential
o�
PROPOSED LAND USE: Single Family
Residential
REQUESTED ACTION: Amendment
of the Moore Family Planned Unit
Development
Summary
The applicant requests a Planned Unit Development (PUD) Amendment to amend Article
VII, Section VII of the Moore Family Planned Unit Development Guide (PUD Guide) to
r
change the height limitation to allow a maximum height of 17 feet, only pertaining to Lot
27e, of the Moore Family PUD Guide. Allowable maximum height is currently 16 feet.
The newly built structure on Lot 27e exceeds the Moore PUD height limit by 10 3/4
,.� inches.
\� Building height is measured pursuant to the definition in Article VI, Section 2 of the PUD
"� \ Guide. The height is measured from the finish grade to the roof midpoint line.
Due to grading considerations the street was laid out in a fashion to allow for proper
drainage of the street and home sites. Upon placing the houses on the sites it was
discovered that the house on Lot 27e was 0 3/4 inches over the maximum allowable
height of 16 feet. The house is in compliance at the rear elevation grade according to the
PUD (Meadow Wood side) but as the site slopes down toward the front (street side), the
house becomes non compliant with the PUD guidelines regarding the maximum
allowable height. See attachment No. 3.
Review Standards
26.445.050 Conceptual, Final, Consolidated, and Minor PUD states:
A development application for Conceptual, Final, Consolidated Conceptual and Final, or
Minor PUD shall comply with the following standards and requirements. Due to the
limited issues associated with Conceptual Reviews and properties eligible for Minor PUD
Review, certain standards shall not be applied as noted. The burden shall rest upon an
applicant to show the reasonableness of the development application, and its conformity
to the standards and procedures of this Chapter and this title.
A. General requirements.
1. The proposed development shall be consistent with the Aspen Area
Community Plan.
2. The proposed development shall be consistent with the character of existing
land uses in the surrounding area.
3. The proposed development shall not adversely affect the future development
of the surrounding area.
4. The proposed development has either been granted GMQS allotments, is
exempt from GMQS, or GMQS allotments are available to accommodate the
proposed development and will be considered prior to, or in combination with,
final PUD development plan review.
➢ Staff Finding:
The proposed PUD amendment does not propose any new development
and;
1. Is consistent with the Aspen Area Community Plan.
2. Is consistent with the character of existing land uses in the
surrounding area.
3. Does not adversely affect the future development of the
surrounding area.
4. The proposed amendment will not have any effect regarding
GMQS because the entire PUD has been provided allotments.
2
B. Establishment of Dimensional Requirements:
The final PUD development plans shall establish the dimensional requirements
for all properties within the PUD as described in General Provisions, Section
26.445.040. The dimensional requirements of the underlying zone district shall be
used as a guide in determining the appropriate dimensions for the PUD. During
review of the proposed dimensional requirements, compatibility with surrounding
land uses and existing development patterns shall be emphasized. The proposed
dimensional requirements shall comply with the following:
1. The proposed dimensional requirements for the subject property are
appropriate and compatible with the following influences on the property:
a) The character of, and compatibility with, existing and expected
future land uses in the surrounding area.
b) Natural or man-made hazards.
c) Existing natural characteristics of the property and surrounding
area such as steep slopes, waterways, shade, and significant
vegetation and landforms.
d) Existing and proposed man-made characteristics of the property
and the surrounding area such as noise, traffic, transit, pedestrian
circulation, parking, and historical resources.
➢ Staff Finding:
The proposed dimensions for the subject property are appropriate and
compatible with four (4) influences noted above. The additional 10 3/"
height of the residence on Lot27e is not discernable in the context of the
Bus Barn Lane cluster of seven (7) houses.
2. The proposed dimensional requirements permit a scale, massing, and quantity
of open space and site coverage appropriate and favorable to the character of
the proposed PUD and of the surrounding area.
➢ Staff Finding:
Per the submitted plans the new dimensional requirements permit a
scale, massing, and quantity of open space and site coverage appropriate
and favorable to the character of the proposed PUD and of the
surrounding area. See comments above.
3. The appropriate number of off-street parking spaces shall be established based
on the following considerations:
a) The probable number of cars used by those using the proposed
development including any non-residential land uses.
b) The varying time periods of use, whenever joint use of common
parking is proposed.
3
c) The availability of public transit and other transportation facilities,
including those for pedestrian access and/or the commitment to
utilize automobile disincentive techniques in the proposed
development.
d) The proximity of the proposed development to the commercial
core and general activity centers in the city.
➢ Staff Finding:
The proposed amendment is only requesting a change in height.for the
PUD specifically relating to the existing house on Lot 27e and would not
have any impacts relating to the above standards 3(a-d) regarding
parking. Parking is provided according to plan.
4. The maximum allowable density within a PUD may be reduced if there exists
insufficient infrastructure capabilities. Specifically, the maximum density of a
PUD may be reduced if:
a) There is not sufficient water pressure, drainage capabilities, or
other utilities to service the proposed development.
b) There are not adequate roads to ensure fire protection, snow
removal, and road maintenance to the proposed development.
➢ Staff Finding:
The proposed amendment would not have any impacts on the existing
infrastructure finding that the amendment is only a change in the PUD
height.
5. The maximum allowable density within a PUD may be reduced if there exists
natural hazards or critical natural site features. Specifically, the maximum
density of a PUD may be reduced if:
a) The land is not suitable for the proposed development because of
ground instability or the possibility of mudflow, rock falls or
avalanche dangers.
b) The effects of the proposed development are detrimental to the
natural watershed, due to runoff, drainage, soil erosion, and
consequent water pollution.
c) The proposed development will have a pernicious effect on air
quality in the surrounding area and the City.
d) The design and location of any proposed structure, road, driveway,
or trail in the proposed development is not compatible with the
terrain or causes harmful disturbance to critical natural features of
the site.
4
➢ Staff Finding:
The amendment does not request any changes in they existing density
and therefore the above standards 5(a-d) is not applicable to this request.
6. The maximum allowable density within a PUD may be increased if there
exists a significant community goal to be achieved through such increase and
the development pattern is compatible with its surrounding development
patterns and with the site's physical constraints. Specifically, the maximum
density of a PUD may be increased if:
a) The increase in density serves one or more goals of the community
as expressed in the Aspen Area Community Plan (AACP) or a
specific area plan to which the property is subject.
b) The site's physical capabilities can accommodate additional
density and there exists no negative physical characteristics of the
site, as identified in subparagraphs 4 and 5, above, those areas can
be avoided, or those characteristics mitigated.
c) The increase in maximum density results in a development pattern
compatible with, and complimentary to, the surrounding existing
and expected development pattern, land uses, and characteristics.
➢ Staff Finding:
The amendment does not request any changes in the existing density
and therefore the above standards 6(a-c) is not applicable to this request.
Notes:
a) Lot sizes for individual lots within a PUD may be established at a
higher or lower rate than specified in the underlying zone district
as long as, on average, the entire PUD conforms to the maximum
density provisions of the respective zone district or as otherwise
established as the maximum allowable density pursuant to a Final
PUD Development Plan.
b) The approved dimensional requirements for all lots within the
PUD are required to be reflected in the final PUD development
plans.
➢ Staff Finding:
The requested amendment is not proposing any changes in lot sizes and
the requested dimensional change for the maximum height limitation in
the PUD Guide will only be specific to Lot 27e within the Moore PUD.
The change will appear in the Moore Family Planned Unit Development
Guide (PUD Guide) Article VII, section VII of the PUD Guide limits as
an amendment.
C. Site Design.
The purpose of this standard is to ensure the PUD enhances public spaces, is
complimentary to the site's natural and man-made features and the adjacent
public spaces, and ensures the public's health and safety. The proposed
development shall comply with the following:
1. Existing natural or man-made features of the site which are unique, provide
visual interest or a specific reference to the past, or contribute to the identity
of the town are preserved or enhanced in an appropriate manner.
2. Structures have been clustered to appropriately preserve significant open
spaces and vistas.
3. Structures are appropriately oriented to public streets, contribute to the urban
or rural context where appropriate, and provide visual interest and
engagement of vehicular and pedestrian movement.
4. Buildings and access ways are appropriately arranged to allow emergency and
service vehicle access.
5. Adequate pedestrian and handicapped access is provided.
6. Site drainage is accommodated for the proposed development in a practical
and reasonable manner and shall not negatively impact surrounding
properties.
7. For non-residential land uses, spaces between buildings are appropriately
designed to accommodate any programmatic functions associated with the
use.
➢ Staff Findings:
The proposed PUD amendment would not impact any site design elements,
more specifically, finding that it:
1. Continues to enhance public spaces.
2. Is complimentary to the site's natural and man-made features and
the adjacent public spaces.
3. Ensures the public's health and safety.
D. Landscape Plan.
The purpose of this standard is to ensure compatibility of the proposed landscape
with the visual character of the city, with surrounding parcels, and with existing
and proposed features of the subject property. The proposed development shall
comply with the following:
1. The landscape plan exhibits a well -designated treatment of exterior spaces,
preserves existing significant vegetation, and provides an ample quantity and
variety of ornamental plant species suitable for the Aspen area climate.
2. Significant existing natural and man-made site features, which provide
uniqueness and interest in the landscape, are preserved or enhanced in an
appropriate manner.
3. The proposed method of protecting existing vegetation and other landscape
features is appropriate.
➢ Staff Finding:
The proposed PUD amendment is not proposing any new landscaping and
would not impact the landscape thus ensuring compatibility with the visual
6
character of the city, with surrounding parcels, and with existing and
proposed features of the subject property.
E. Architectural Character.
It is the purpose of this standard is to encourage architectural interest, variety,
character, and visual identity in the proposed development and within the City
while promoting efficient use of resources. Architectural character is based upon
the suitability of a building for its purposes, legibility of the building's use, the
building's proposed massing, proportion, scale, orientation to public spaces and
other buildings, use of materials, and other attributes that may significantly
represent the character of the proposed development. There shall be approved as
part of the final development plan an architectural character plan, which
adequately depicts the character of the proposed development. The proposed
architecture of the development shall:
1. Be compatible with or enhance the visual character of the city, appropriately
relate to existing and proposed architecture of the property, represent a
character suitable for, and indicative of, the intended use, and respect the scale
and massing of nearby historical and cultural resources.
2. Incorporate, to the extent practical, natural heating and cooling by taking
advantage of the property's solar access, shade, and vegetation and by use of
non- or less -intensive mechanical systems.
3. Accommodate the storage and shedding of snow, ice, and water in a safe and
appropriate manner that does not require significant maintenance.
➢ Staff Finding:
The additional height (10 -%'), of the residences in the subject property does
not alter the architectural character of the structure or negatively impact the
neighborhood.
F. Lighting.
The purpose of this standard to ensure the exterior of the development will be
lighted in an appropriate manner considering both public safety and general
aesthetic concerns. The following standards shall be accomplished:
1. All lighting is proposed so as to prevent direct glare or hazardous interference
of any kind to adjoining streets or lands. Lighting of site features, structures,
and access ways is proposed in an appropriate manner.
2. All exterior lighting shall in compliance with the Outdoor Lighting Standards
unless otherwise approved and noted in the final PUD documents. Up lighting
of site features, buildings, landscape elements, and lighting to call inordinate
attention to the property is prohibited for residential development.
VA
➢ Staff Finding:
No new lighting is proposed for this PUD amendment. The standards stated
above are not applicable.
G. Common Parr Open Space, or Recreation Area.
If the proposed development includes a common park, open space, or recreation
area for the mutual benefit of all development in the proposed PUD, the following
criteria shall be met:
1. The proposed amount, location, and design of the common park, open space,
or recreation area enhances the character of the proposed development,
considering existing and proposed structures and natural landscape features of
the property, provides visual relief to the property's built form, and is
available to the mutual benefit of the various land uses and property users of
the PUD.
2. A proportionate, undivided interest in all common park and recreation areas is
deeded in perpetuity (not for a number of years) to each lot or dwelling unit
owner within the PUD or ownership is proposed in a similar manner.
3. There is proposed an adequate assurance through a legal instrument for the
permanent care and maintenance of open spaces, recreation areas, and shared
facilities together with a deed restriction against future residential,
commercial, or industrial development.
➢ Staff Finding:
The proposed development does not include a common park, open space, or
recreation area therefore is not required to meet the standards G 1-4 as
stated above.
H. Utilities and Public facilities.
The purpose of this standard is to ensure the development does not impose an
undue burden on the City's infrastructure capabilities and that the public does not
incur an unjustified financial burden. The proposed utilities and public facilities
associated with the development shall comply with the following:
1. Adequate public infrastructure facilities exist to accommodate the
development.
2. Adverse impacts on public infrastructure by the development will be mitigated
by the necessary improvements at the sole cost of the developer.
3. Oversized utilities, public facilities, or site improvements are provided
appropriately and where the developer is reimbursed proportionately for the
additional improvement.
➢ Staff Finding:
The house height change will not impact public infrastructure.
I. Access and Circulation. (Only standards 1 &2 apply to Minor PUD applications)
The purpose of this standard is to ensure the development is easily accessible,
does not unduly burden the surrounding road network, provides adequate
pedestrian and recreational trail facilities and minimizes the use of security gates.
The proposed access and circulation of the development shall meet the following
criteria:
1. Each lot, structure, or other land use within the PUD has adequate access to a
public street either directly or through an approved private road, a pedestrian
way, or other area dedicated to public or private use.
2. The proposed development, vehicular access points, and parking arrangement
do not create traffic congestion on the roads surrounding the proposed
development, or such surrounding roads are proposed to be improved to
accommodate the development.
3. Areas of historic pedestrian or recreational trail use, improvements of, or
connections to, the bicycle and pedestrian trail system, and adequate access to
significant public lands and the rivers are provided through dedicated public
trail easements and are proposed for appropriate improvements and
maintenance.
4. The recommendations of the Aspen Area Community Plan and adopted
specific plans regarding recreational trails, pedestrian and bicycle paths, and
transportation are proposed to be implemented in an appropriate manner.
5. Streets in the PUD, which are proposed or recommended to be retained under
private ownership, provide appropriate dedication to public use to ensure
appropriate public and emergency access.
6. Security gates, guard posts, or other entryway expressions for the PUD, or for
lots within the PUD, are minimized to the extent practical.
➢ Staff Finding:
The requirement to meet the Access and Circulation standards are not
relevant pertaining to the requested PUD amendment.
J. Phasing of Development Plan. (Does not apply to Conceptual PUD applications)
The purpose of these criteria is to ensure partially completed projects do not
create an unnecessary burden on the public or surrounding property owners and
impacts of an individual phase are mitigated adequately. If phasing of the
development plan is proposed, each phase shall be defined in the adopted final
PUD development plan. The phasing plan shall comply with the following:
1. All phases, including the initial phase, shall be designed to function as a
complete development and shall not be reliant on subsequent phases.
2. The phasing plan describes physical areas insulating, to the extent practical,
occupants of initial phases from the construction of later phases.
3. The proposed phasing plan ensures the necessary or proportionate
improvements to public facilities, payment of impact fees and fees -in -lieu,
construction of any facilities to be used jointly by residents of the PUD,
X
construction of any required affordable housing, and any mitigation measures
are realized concurrent or prior to the respective impacts associated with the
phase.
Staff Findings:
The requirement to meet the Phasing and Development standards are not
relevant pertaining to the requested PUD amendment.
Staff Recommendations
Staff recommends approval for a Planned Unit Development (PUD) amendment to
amend Article VII, Section VII of the Moore Family Planned Unit Development Guide
(PUD Guide) to change the height limitation allowing a maximum height of 17 feet, that
will only pertain to Lot 27e, finding that the criteria per Section 26.445.050 Review
Standards: Conceptual, Final, Consolidated, and Minor PUD have been met or is not
applicable, subject to the recommended conditions of approval."
Recommended Motions
"I move to approve Resolution Nq3�—/, (Series of 2001) for a Planned Unit
Development (PUD) amendment to amend Article VII, Section VII of the Moore Family
Planned Unit Development Guide (PUD Guide) to change the height limitation allowing
a maximum height of 17 feet, only pertaining to Lot 27e, finding that the criteria per
Section 26.445.050 Review Standards: Conceptual, Final, Consolidated, and Minor PUD
have been met, subject to the recommended conditions of approval.
ATTACHMENTS:
1-
LETTER FROM ARCHETECT EXPLAINING WHY AND
THE HOUSE ON LOT 27E IS 10 % INCHES OVER
REQUIRED MAXIMUM HEIGHT OF 16 FEET.
�/ 3 - BUIL CTLON OF LOT 27E
4 - LETTER FROM ARCHITECT VERIFY THE HEIGHT OF ALL
SEVEN STRUCTURES LOCATED IN THE MOORE FAMILY
PUD BLOCK A
5 - LETTER VERIFYING THE HEIGHT OF STRUCTURES
10
July 9, 2001 • •
Steve Clay
Community Development Department AUGUST
130 South Galena Street RENO
Aspen, CO 81611 AIA
RE: Lot 27E Bus Barn Lane SCOTT
SMITH
Dear Steve, AIA
The "B" affordable housing units as designed for placement on Bus _
Barn Lane were limited in height due to the restrictions imposed by the
P. U. D. The allowable height was to be a maximum of 16' as measured
by the Pitkin County Land Use Code in effect as of the granting of the
P. U. D. This measurement is taken at the midpoint of the roof and is
combined with several other limitations as explained in the land use R E NO - SMITH
code. AV, I 1 I I I C 7' S, L. L. C.
III
These houses were designed to be placed on seven lots and as such were
designed to be approximately 6" under the maximum allowable height
210 L. f 1YMAN
allowing some flexibility as to placement on the site. The civil engineer
N" 202
then developed the site by designing the road, utilities, grading and
placing the homes on the various lots.
ASPEN
CO LORA DO
Due to grading considerations the street was laid out in a fashion so as
81011
to allow for proper drainage of all the home sites and the street. Upon
placing the houses on the sites it was discovered that all of the building
970.925.5968
heights worked within this height limitation with the exception of Lot
FACSIMILE
27e and this house is in compliance at the rear (Meadowwood side)
970.925.5993
elev4jpn. The site then slopes down toward the front (street) and the
house is then 10 3/4" over that allowed by the P.U.D.
AIL
of f icrC�'rcncnm ith.com
renosm
Respectfully,
0371 SOUTHSIDE DRIVE
BASALT
Lei Alan Letson COLORADO
81621
970.927.6834
FACSIMILE
970.927.6840
•
November 16, 2000
Matt Stokes
Hines Interests
Highlands Base Village
Aspen, CO 81611
Re: Five Trees Phase II
Bus Barn Height Calculations
Dear Mr. Stokes,
We have calculated the roof mid point heights on all of the sites on Bus
Barn Lane. These heights were derived using the ridge elevations supplied
by Schmueser Gordon Meyer on October 12, 2000 via email. We then
compared these elevations to the spot grades (also supplied by SGM on
November 13, 2000) as they occur under the roof mid points on the
Revised Detailed Submission. In each case the most restrictive grade was
used. Lots 25e, 26e, 27e, and 28e the Revised Detailed Submission is lower
than finished grade so the R.D.S was used for calculation. Lots 29e, 30e
and 31 a the R.D.S. grade is equal to the finished grade. 6" of top soil will be
added to the construction grade to arrive at the finished grade.
The following are the roof midpoint heights and height above Revised
Detailed Submission as these houses were placed on the building sites by the
contractor under the direction of Schmueser Gordon Meyer (all heights
were calculated at the worst case condition as required by code):
(( i L
Ridge ht. •
Mid pt. ht.:
Ht Above Rev. Dev. Sub.:
l Lot 25e
8016.96'
8011.96'
15'-I1 1/2"
Lot 26e
8014.36'
8009.36'
15'-10 1/4"
Lot 27e
8011.19'
8006.91'
16'-10 3/4"
Lot 28e
8004.04'
7999.04'
15'-0 1/2" — 16'-0 1/2"
Lot 29e
8008.74'
8003.74'
15'-2 7/8"
Lot 30e
8014.2 V
8009.377'
15'-10 1/2"
Lot 3le
8015.26'
8010.26'
15'-9 1/8"
R ctfully,
Aug t . Reno A.
Encl:
Lot 25e section w/ roof height calculations
Lot 26e section w/ roof height calculations
Lot 27e section w/ roof height calculations —
Lot 28e section w/ roof height calculations
Lot 29e section w/ roof height calculations
Lot 30e section w/ roof height calculations
Lot 31 a section w/ roof height calculations
} \ \1
01
AUGUST G.
. R E IN 0
ATTACHMENT
AUG U>T
RENO
AIA
SCOTT
SMITH
AIA
RENO - SMITH
III
210 E. HYMAN
N 202
ASPEN
CO LO RA DO
81e11
970.925.5968
FACSIMILE
>70.025.501)3
E-MAIL
olficrtr,roiosmith LOM
0371 SOUTHSIDE DRIVE
BASALT
COLORADO
sio21
970927.0834
FACSIMILE
970 92 7.0840
ASPEN/PITKIN CON14MUNITY DEVELOPMENT
130 SOUTH GALENA STREET
ASPEN, COLORADO 81611
970-920-5090
ATTACMENT
-T.-
Mr. Bob Daniel
c/o Zoom Flume LLC
P.O. Box 5115
Aspen, CO 81612
Re: Bus Barn Lane Community.
Dear Bob:
This letter shall certify that I, Joanna Schaffner, Pitkin County Zoning Officer,
have reviewed the building heights for the six affordable housing units built on Bus
Barn Lane on Lots 25, 26, 28, 29, 30, and 31 (Block A) in the Moore Family
PUD/Subdivision. I hereby verify that the building height of these individual units does
not exceed 16 feet as measured pursuant to the Pitkin County Land Use Code in effect
on June 1993, which governs their approval. The height of the homes is in compliance
with both the Pitkin County Land Use Code and the PUD Guide for measuring height in
the Moore Family PUD/Subdivision.
Very truly yours,
ASPEN/PITKIN COMMUNITY
DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT
Joann. Schaffner
ZoniAcr Officer
C.
2725518_ I . DOC
! •
RESOLUTION NO.�, SERIES OF 2001
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF ASPEN PLANNING AND ZONING
COMMISSION APPROVING A PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT (PUD)
AMENDMENT TO AMEND ARTICLE VII, SECTION VII OF THE MOORE
FAMILY PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT GUIDE (PUD GUIDE) TO
CHANGE THE HEIGHT LIMITATION ALLOWING A MAXIMUM HEIGHT
OF 17 FEET ONLY PERTAINING TO LOT 27E
Parcel ID: 2735-013-02-004
WHEREAS, the Community Development Department received an application
from the Applicant, Zoom Flume LLC, represented Davis Horn Inc, requesting a Planned
Unit Development (PUD) amendment to amend Article VII, Section VII of the Moore
Family Planned Unit Development Guide (PUD Guide) to change the height limitation
allowing a maximum height of 17 feet only pertaining to lot 27e; and
WHEREAS, pursuant to Sections 26,445, the Planning and Zoning Commission
may approve an amendment to an approved Planned Unit Development, during a duly
noticed public hearing, comments form the general public, a recommendation from the
Community Development Staff, and recommendations from relevant referral agencies;
WHEREAS, upon review of the application and the applicable Land Use Code
standards, the Community Development Department recommends approval for a Planned
Unit Development amendment; and
WHEREAS, the Aspen Planning and Zoning Commission has reviewed and
considered the development proposal under the applicable provisions of the Municipal Code
as identified herein, has reviewed and considered the recommendation of the Community
Development Director, and has taken and considered public comment at a duly noticed
public hearing conducted on July 17, 2001; and
WHEREAS, the City of Aspen Planning and Zoning Commission finds that the
development proposal meets or exceeds all applicable development standards and that the
approval of the development proposal is consistent with the goals and elements of the Aspen
Area Community Plan; and,
WHEREAS, the Planning and Zoning Commission approved, by a vote of to
( , ) for the Planned Unit Development amendment; and,
WHEREAS, the City of Aspen Planning and Zoning Commission finds that this
Resolution furthers and is necessary for the promotion of public health, safety, and welfare.
11
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE PLANNING AND ZONING
COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF ASPEN, COLORADO ON THE 17th DAY OF
JULY, 2001, THAT:
Section 1
Pursuant to the procedures and standards set forth in Title 26 of the Aspen Municipal
Code, the amendment to the Moore Family PUD Guide for the purpose of allowing a
change in height of Lot 27e, Block A is approved with the following conditions:
1. The amendment to the Moore Family PUD Guide to change the height limitation
allowing a maximum height of 17 feet is specifically and only for Lot 27e.
2. That the applicant shall record with the Pitkin County Clerk and Recorder this
Resolution and a document approved by the Community Development
Department reflecting the special change to the Moore Family PUD Guide.
Section 2
All material representations and commitments made by the applicant pursuant to the
development proposal approvals as herein awarded, whether in public hearing or
documentation presented before the Planning and Zoning Commission or City Council, are
hereby incorporated in such plan development approvals and the same shall be complied
with as if fully set forth herein, unless amended by an authorized entity.
Section 3
If any section, subsection, sentence, clause, phrase, or portion of this Resolution is for any
reason held invalid or unconstitutional in a court of competent jurisdiction, such portion
shall be deemed a separate, distinct and independent provision and shall not affect the
validity of the remaining portions thereof.
Approved by the Commission at its regular meeting on July 17th, 2001.
APPROVED AS TO FORM: PLANNING AND ZONING
COMMISSION:
City Attorney
ATTEST:
Jackie Lothian, Deputy City Clerk
Jasmine Tygre, Chair
12
ror cash tfk
THE EAST
21 BEARS
M�F
,-
:
7.50 FEET TO EACH
DESCRIBED CENTER-
R4NGTED
E 85
r3O6
OIDI
F COLORADO;
EACH SIDE
TERLINECORNER
W 1322.68
To
100'
4Y OF THE DENVER AND RIO
?ERN RAILROAD SHOWN IN PLAT
PAGE 62 OF THE PITKIN COUNTY
ECORDER'S OFFICE AND THE CEN-
-HE EXISTING RIO GRANDE TRAIL,
T BEGINNING; THENCE LEAVING
F-WAY ALONG THE CENTERLINE
SRANDE TRAIL THE FOLLOWING
3NG THE ARC OF A CURVE TO
.VING A RADIUS OF 156.65 FEET
24L ANGLE OF 28°22'25". A DIS-
.7.58 FEET (CHORD BEARS N
;.79 FEEI); THENCE N 31 °41'56" W
'HENCE ALONG THE ARC OF A
iE RIGHT HAVING A RADIUS OF
AND A CENTRAL ANGLE OF
(STANCE OF 78.97 FEET (CHORD
:7'47" W 78.83 FEET) THENCE N
.6.73 FEET: THENCE ALONG THE
JRVE TO THE RIGHT HAVING A
1.42 FEET AND A CENTRAL ANGLE
. A DISTANCE OF 55.51 FEET
tS N 10'23'26" W 55.28 FEET) N
t0.86 FEET; THENCE ALONG THE
URVE TO THE LEFT HAVING A
).00 FEET AND A CENTRAL ANGLE
A DISTANCE OF 153.19 FEET
AS N 13'55'12" W 151.53 FEET);
32'55" W 382.78 FEET; THENCE
%RC OF A CURVE TO THE LEFT
DIUS OF 25.00 FEET AND A CEN-
)F 89' 15'08", A DISTANCE OF 38.94
BEARS N 73' 10'29" W 35.12 FEET)
)N THE EASTERLY RIGHT-OF-WAY
.All. EASEMENT TO PITKIN COUN- PUBLIC NOTICE
N PLAT BOOK 24 AT PAGE 62 OF RE: 1210 RED BUTTE STREAM MARGIN REVIEW
OUNTY CLERK AND RECORDER'S NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that a public hearing
TFJtMINUS, WHENCE THE FAST will be held on July 17. 2001 at a meeting to
RNF:R OF SECTION 21 BEARS S begin at 4:30 p.m. before the Aspen Planning and
- Zoning Commission. Sister Cities Room. City
,,. .,, 4,-. .r,-.,.
'r
�MINFNCWG AT THE EAST QUARTER CORNER
OF SECTION 21: THENCE S 04°06'39" W 1765.33
FEET TO p POINT ON THE CENTERLINE OF THE
EKfS77NG RI0I;RANDE TRAIL, SAID POINT ALSO
BEING ON THE CFIYIFRLINE OF THE EXIST7NG
RIO-GRANDE TRAIL NO. 3. AND ALSO BEING ON
THE WESTERLY RIGHT-OF-WAY OF THE EXIST-
ING PLATTED RIO-GRANDE TRAIL EASEMENT
THE POINT OF BEGWMNC; THENCE LEAVING
THE CENTERLINE OF THE EXISTING RIO
GRANDE TRAIL NO.3 THE FOLLOWING COURS-
ES ALONG SAID CENTERLINE N 24'58'50" E A
DISTANCE OF 1428 FEET; THENCE ALONG THE
ARC OF CURVE TO THE LEFT HAVING A RADIUS
OF 90.00 FEET AND A CENTRAL ANGLE OF
07'23'25", A DISTANCE OF 11.61 FEET (CHORD
BEARS N 21'I7'08" E 11.60 FEET); THENCE N
17°35'25" E A DISTANCE OF 14.55 FEET; THENCE
ALONG THE ARC OF CURVE TO THE RIGHT HAV.
ING A RADIUS OF 140.00 FEET AND A CENTRAL
ANGLE OF 17-20-58", A DISTANCE OF 42.39 FEET
(CHORD BEARS N 26'15'54" E 42.23 FEET);
THENCE ALONG THE ARC OF A REVERSE CURVE
TO THE LEFT HAVING A RADIUS OF 1409.06
FEET AND A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 01*32*35", A
DISTANCE OF 37.95 FEET (CHORD BEARS N
34' 10'06" 10'06" E 37.95 FEET); THENCE ALONG
A COMPOUND CURVE TO THE LEFT HAVING A
RADIUS OF 280.00 FEET AND A CENTRAL ANGLE
OF .18'35'061, A DISTANCE OF 90,82 FEET
(CHORD BEARS N 24'06'16" E 90.43 FEET);
THENCE N 14'48'43" E. A DISTANCE OF 40.90
FEET; THENCE ALONG THE ARC OF CURVE TO
THE LEFT HAVING A RADIUS OF 150.00 FEET
AND A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 17'52'10", A DIS-
TANCE OF 46.78 FEET (CHORD BEARS N
05°52'38" E 46.59 FEET); THENCE N 03°03'28" W
A DISTANCE OF 58.95 FEET; THENCE ALONG
THE ARC OF CURVE TO THE LEFT HAVING A
RADIUS OF 300.00 FEET AND A CENTRAL ANGLE
OF 13'28'15". A DISTANCE OF 70.53 FEET
(CHORD BEARS N 09-47.36" W 70.37 FEET);
THENCE N 16*31*43" W A DISTANCE OF 95.93
FEET TO A POINT ON THE BOUNDARY OF THE
LOWE W/J RANCH. THE TERMINUS, WHENCE
THE EAST QUARTER CORNER OF SAID SECTION
21 BEARS N 02°49'19" E 1266.46 FEET.
Published In The Aspen Times on June 30,
2001.(76165)
mousing
IOC3I-
the existing
ontiCt Fled Jarman at
e t mmunity Development
f� S Galena St., Aspen, CO (970)
s/Robert Blalch, Chair
n Planning and Zoning Commission
The Aspen Times on June 30, 2001.
PUBLIC NOTICE
SUPPLEMENTAL APPROPRIATION TO
THE 2001 BUDGET
FOR PITKIN COUNTY, COLORADO
Notice Is hereby given that a supplemental
appropriation to the 2001 budget has been sub-
mitted to the Pitkin County Board of County
Commissioners. A PUBLIC HEARING has been
scheduled on Wednesday, July 11, 2001 to begin
at 2:00 PM, or as soon as the conduct of busi-
ness allows, at the Plaza 1 Meeting Room, first
floor, Courthouse Annex Building, 530 East Main
Street, Aspen, Colorado, at which time and place
all members of the public may appear and be
heard. A copy of the supplemental appropria-
tion Is filed with the Pitkin County Finance Office
on the second floor suite 201 at 530 East Main
Street, Aspen, Colorado and is open for public
Inspection. Citizens are Invited to make written
or oral comments with regard to the proposed
budget either at the public hearing or by con-
tacting Debe Nelson, Finance Director, at 920-
5229.
SUMMARY OF PROPOSED CHANGES
N to Frpendw=
Here Is a summary of the changes in revenues
and expenditures by fund:
General fund $2,813,290
Use Tax fund 1,898.188
Road & Bridge fund 0
Social Services fund 1,478
Open Space fund 4,445,617
0.5 cent Mass Transit Sales &
Use Tax fund 0
Pitkin County Library
Endowment fund 588.275
Pitkin County Library fund 38,350
Airport fund 1,554,155
Solid Waste Center fund $32�920
$11.872.273
NET INCREASED EXPENDITURES $11,872.273
BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
OF PITKIN COUNTY, COLORADO
By Mick Ireland. Chairperson
Published In The Aspen Times on June 30, 2001.
(76167)
PUBLIC NOTICE
Notice of Availability
NOTICE OF DECISION
White River National Forest
Aspen Ranger District
Buttermilk Ski Area
Master Development Plan Decision
On June 29. 200 1, Jim M. Upchurch. Aspen
District Ranger for the White River National
Forest approved construction of ski area facili-
ties at the Buttermilk Ski area. The project area
is located in Pitkin County, Colorado.
This decision Is subject to appeal pursuant to 36
CFR 215.7. A written Notice of Appeal must be
submitted within 45 days after the date the
notice of this decision is published in the news-
paper of record. Notice must be sent to:
USDA -Forest Service
White River National Forest
-ATTN: Martha Ketelle
Appeal Deciding Officer
P.O. Boy. 948
Glenwood Springs, Colorado 816024)94P
Box
•�L _K, VA17VE t
,. 8194, Aspen C�g � Amy
sofa, 2 wood end table, six dre.b d�a....
4 single box springs, 2 quilted single head-
boards, 2 quilted bed bases, 2 dressers, sleeper
sofa, round table and leaf, nitestand, 2 rnattreas
es, headboard, 2 nitestands. headboard and bed
base, 6 drawers, 2 headboards table, dresser
and chair.
Lott AUSTIN Jehn Adds, c/o International
Investment. 755629 Kuakinl Hwy., @R-6M
Kailua-l(ona, HI 96740. 7 wardrobe cartons, 6 4-S
cartons, 10 small I cartons, 2 dish perk, 6 medium
cartons, 2 dish pales, 6 medium cartons. 2 mirror
cartons, wooden wine rack, 12 pair of skis, 2 ski
bags and poles.
L.ot# BOEDFR Lawrence Boeder, 455 East
Wisconsin Ave., Lake Forest, IL 60045.3 cartons,
2 chests and cocktail table.
Lot# CHAPEL Jennifer Chapel, P.O. Box 18327,
Avon, CO 81620.23 small cartons, 9 medium car-
tons, 4 large cartons, tricycle, child's bike, 5
plastic containers, back pack , trash can, 2 end
tables, milk crate, 2 chairs, table base, table top,
step up, single mattress, single box spring, head-
board and footboard, 2 side tables, end table,
dresser, 8 plastic bags, microwave, double mat-
tress, double box springs, bed base and side
rails, headboard and footboard, queen mattress,
20" tv, high chair, play kitchen, toys, ottoman,
Ironing board, love seat, sofa, drawers and 1 mir-
ror carton.
Lot# DUTCH CRAFTER, Dutch Crafter. 223
North Clay Street, Zelienople, PA 16063. New
chair.
Lot# HELLER Peggy Heller 20 Ocean Ave. Santa
Monica, CA 90402. 13 small cartons, 2 dish pack
carton, I long carton, 3 medium cartons, I large
carton, 2 4.5 cartons, snowboard, white bag, ski
poles. ski boots, boots and black ski bag.
Lot# NEDLIN Joe and Mary NedUn, 4280 Galt
Ocean Dr. 010-A, Fort Lauderdale, FL 333086102.
6 piece sofa sectional.
Lot# RONAY Mark Ronny, 22 small cartons, 5
medium cartons, 7 4.5 cartons, 5 large cartons, 2
dish pak cartons, tv, metal table base, wood
table base, 2 snowboards, folding chair, skis, ski
poles, red floor lamp, black metal floor lamp, 3
folding chain, cat playground, small painting, 2
black speakers, 12 wood crates. 6 wood boxes,
green bag, suitcase, Hoover vacuum. red basket,
off white trunk plastic container, blue basket.
plastic bag, green bag, cat box, 2 brown speak-
ers, old trunk, green os chair, humidifier, and a
black TV cabinet.
Lot# RISTICH Roland RWlch, 509 Elizabeth
Road, Waterford, MI 48328. 1 small carton, 3
medium cartons, green duffle bag and black duf-
fle bag.
Lot# Miscellaneous: headboard, bed slats and
rails, cabinet, counter top, 4 mirror cartons, 14.5
carton, 2 medium cartons, 3 large cartons, 2
book cartons, I flat carton, bed base, mattress, 2
box springs, car seat, laundry basket, arrow, 2
rolled rug, 2 long pillows, 3 short pillows, large
vase, love seat, headboard and foot board, king
head board and footboard, side rails, king mat-
tress and box springs, wing chair, ottoman, plas-
tic bag, rug, 2 lamps and shades. 2 small tables,
bear skin, buffet, small end table, futon mat-
tress, blanket, 2 sofas, small refrigerator, end
table, dresser, marble top, headboard, armoire,
sectional sofa, 2 os chairs, 2 headboards, foot-
board and exercise bike.
Published in The Aspen Times June 30. July 7,
14. 2001. (76154)
PUBLIC NOTICE
RE: MOORE PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT
(PUD) AMENDMENT
HEIGHT REQUIREMENT - 36 BUS BARN LANE
NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that a public hearing.
will be held on Tuesday, July 17. 2001. at a meet-
ing to begin -at 4:30 p.m. before.. the, Aspen
PianninR and Zoning CommissigrL Sister Cities
Meeting Room. City Hall. '130 S. Galena St.,
Aspen, to consider an application submitted by
s
as
•'SdtfJi�dp$an(PaytJtine 3�Jiily �; '2�I01
LIVING inc.
i-1114
Find the Perfect Tenant or Roommate
HASSLE -FREE!
List your available living space now
with Local Living Inc.
• ADUAn-law Units • Condos/Pownhomes
• Roommate Situations • Homes/Duplexes
• Cabins • Rent a room in your home!
A complimentary resource for homeowners & landlords.
�Al Ma
MEUSE
E A L E 5 T A T E
Prestigious in -Town Duplex
Like new! Turnkey, immaculate, light and spacious townhome.
Convenient East End cul-de-sac privacy... Walk to everywhere. 3-bed-
rooms, 3 i/2-bath plus Office and Family Rooms. 3 levels. South -fac-
ing —Aspen him. plus Red Mtn. views!. Rooftop Hot Tub. Custom
decorator finishes Gourmet kitchen.
Offered Furnished at $3,750,000.
ipresswe Penthouse
in Town
lom, 3 112 bath, 3400 sq.ft. on one
,,man. Center of town, walk to every -
views from secluded decks. Hot tub!
-ivare elevator! Must see to believe!
15,000.
Red Mountain Beauty
Outstanding 4500 ssq. ft. (plus decks) entertaining resi-
dence with three bedrooms, four baths, office/media room
(could be the 4th bedroorI). Full separate guest house.
Offered furnished at $3,980,000. July rental available.
one, , !
1, r.vo bedtntlnl, 'avo ath — — `—
blocks to the Little'Nell tel and the
adola. Outdoor pod, shurtle to town.
ry. Easy-to-sh6w.
0 P[IBLIC Now E
Davis Horn Inc., requesting approval of an appli-
cation for a PUD Amendment to change height
limitations on Lot 27e. Lot 27e exceeds the
Moore PUD Guide height limit by 10 3/4 inches.
The property is described as Lot 27e of Block A
(Bus Bam Lane) City of Aspen.
For further information, contact Steve Clay at
the Aspen/Pitkin Community Development
Department, 130 S. Galena St., Aspen, CO (970)
920-5095, stephencOci.aspen.co.us
s/Bob Blaich, Chair
Aspen Planning and Zoning Commission
Published in The Aspen Times on June 30, 2001.
(76159)
PUBLIC NOTICE
PUBLIC NOTICE is given that on May 2, 2001. by
an ORDER of the Court, Pitkin County, Colorado,
the following name was changed:
The name of Arlene Jessica Beth Rothman
was changed to Chana Arlene Jessica Beth
Rothman.
Patrick Peterson, Clerk of Court
By s/ Deputy Clerk
Certified May 8, 2001: Glenita Melnick, Clerk
Published in The Aspen Times on June 16, 23,
and 30, 2001. (76092)
PUBLIC NOTICE
COUNTY COURT, PITKIN COUNTY, COLORADO
IN THE MATTER OF THE PETITION OF ADULT
Case No. 01 C 112
PUBLIC NOTICE is given that on 6/5/01, by an
order of the court, Pftkin County, Colorado, the
following name was changed:
The name of John -Martin Winthrop Nordhagen
was changed to Johnnemann Winthrop
Nordhagen.
Patrick Peterson, Clerk of Court
By: s/Glenita L. Melnick
Deputy Clerk
Published in The Aspen Times June 16, 23. 30,
2001.(76097)
PUBLIC NOTICE
COUNTY COURT, PITKIN COUNTY, COLORADO
IN THE MATTER OF THE PETITION OF ADULT
Case No. OIC117
PUBLIC NOTICE is given that on 6/6/01, by an
ORDER of the court, Pitkin County, Colorado.
the following name was changed:
The name of Roger Dean Barnett was changed
to Scotty Dean Barnett.
Patrick Peterson, Clerk of Court
By:s/Deputy Clerk
Published in The Aspen Times June 16. 23, 30,
2001.(76098)
PUBLIC NOTICE
NOTICE TO CREDITORS
ESTATE OF ROBERT MORRIS GAUDIN
Probate No. 01-PR-24, DIVISION 3
All persons having claims against the
above -named estate are required to present
them to Carol L. Gaudin or to the District Court
of Pitkin County, Colorado, on or before October
30.2001, or such claims may be forever barred.
Carol L. Gaudin, Personal Representative
c/o OATES, KNEZEVICH & GARDENSWARTZ. P.C.
Attention: Richard A. Knezevich, Esq.
Attorneys for Personal Representative
533 East Hopkins Avenue, 3rd Floor
Aspen, Colorado 81611
(970) 920-1700
Published in The Aspen Times June 30, July 7,
: i. 21. 2001. (76152)
PUBLIC NOTICE
NOTICE TO CREDITORS
Estate of WARREN J. CONNER, also known as
WARREN JOHN CONNER, Deceased
Case No. Ol PR 21
All persons having claims against the above -
named estate are required to present them to
the personal representative or to the District
Court of Pitkin County, Colorado on or before
October 15, 2001, or the claims may be forever
barred.
CLAUDE M.CONNER
setback variance where 30
construction of a detached
square foot lot In the R-15A
6 foot 3 Inch height variant
maximum height allowed fo
lure, to construct a detach.
Description: Lot 44, Block
Valley Subdivision, aka: 01
Drive, Aspen.
Pugh, James H.: requesting
setback variance where 30
this 30,511 square foot lot
trict, to construct a second
ing garage.
Property Description: Lot
Mountain Ranch Subdivisi•
Creek Road, Aspen.
Two Mile Ranch, LLC: req
a Front Yard and Collector
ante where 100 feet Is req
property line and where 50
the Woody Creek Road righ,
an addition to an historic st
contains 79.106 acres an
Property Description: 3448
Published in The Aspen Tin
(76166)
PUBLIC NO'
ORDINANCE
SERIES OF
AN ORDINANCE OF THE A.`
GRANTING APPROVAL FOR
NATION OF 419 E. HYMAN
ING FORK ARMS CONDOM
CITY AND TOWNSITE OF At,
Copies of this ordinance
office of the city clerk, 130 c
during normal business hoL
INTRODUCED and I
AFTER PUBLIC HEARING on
2001.
Helen Kai:
ATTEST: Kathry
Published in The Aspen T.
(76157)
PUBLIC NO
ORDINANCE,'
(Series of 2(
AN ORDINANCE OF THE C17
CITY OF ASPEN, COLORAC
TION 23.48.070(0 OF THE b'
EXTEND THE EXPIRATIO
AFFORDABLE HOUSING RE
FER TAX.
Copies of this ordinance .
office of the city clerk, 130 S
during normal business hou
INTRODUCED and F
AFTER PUBLIC HEARING on
2001.
Helen Kali
ATTEST: Kathry
Published in The Aspen T;
(76158)
PUBLIC NO'
Seniorsindepen<
Notice of Ninth Ann
The 9th Annual Meeting of 5
Inc. will be held July 11,
Immediately following lu.
County Senior Center, 275
Aspen, CO The Annual Repr
and two or more new dire,
business appropriate to ti
membership may be discus
All who have paid their 201
made a donation of $10.00
fiscal year beginning July 1.
vote on any action that M
assemblage on July 11; 2001
For further Information, plea
Secretary, 925-748 .
t
9 1 0
Davis Horn -
PLANNING & REAL ESTATE CONSULTING
1
May 14, 2001 y
James Lindt
City of Aspen Community Development Department
130 South Galena Street
Aspen, Colorado 81611
Re: Moore Family PUD: Amendment to the PUD Guide
Dear James:
Davis Horn Incorporated represents the Zoom Flume LLC ("applicant")
in this land use application. Zoom Flume LLC, is the successor in
title to the James E. Moore Family Partnership and the
("developer") of the Moore Family PUD. Attachment 1, vicinity map,
(Moore PUD Final Plat page 3/9) shows that the Moore PUD is located
on south and east of Maroon Creek Road near the Aspen schools. The
Moore PUD is bordered by the Meadowood Subdivision to the east.
The applicant is seeking an amendment to Article VII of the Moore
Family Planned Unit Development Guide (PUD Guide) to change "Height
limitations." Article VII, section VII of the PUD Guide limits the
height of affordable housing units on Lots 25e through 31e to 16
feet. Building height is measured pursuant to the definition in
Article VI, Section 2 of the PUD Guide. The applicant requests a
PUD Guide amendment to allows a maximum height of 17 feet on Lot
27e.
Attachment 2 depicts Moore Family PUD, Block A (Bus Barn Lane).
Attachment 3 is a November 16, 2000 letter from Augie Reno,
Architect, to Matt Stokes which verifies the height of all seven
structures located in Moore Family PUD Block A. Attachment 4 is a
letter signed by Joanna Schaffner verifying that all the structures
in Block A with the exception of the structure on Lot 27e comply
with the height limitation in the PUD Guide. The structure on Lot
27e exceeds the Moore PUD Guide height limit by 10 3/4 inches.
Attachment 5 is a copy of Moore PUD Guide page 21 of 40 which
depicts the typical unit for Lots 25e - 31e. Attachment 6 depicts
the Lot 25e height calculation for the existing house.
LAND USE APPROVALS
On June 28, 1999 the City of Aspen approved Ordinance No. 24 Series
of 1999 which established a procedure and standards for minor PUD
amendments to the Moore Family PUD. The proposed amendment to the
Moore PUD Guide complies with all of the following standards with
the exception of standard c. The height of the structure on Lot
27e is slightly inconsistent with representations made in the
original development review.
ALICE DAVIS, AICP I GLENN HORN, AICP
215 SOUTH MONARCH ST. • SUITE 104 • ASPEN, COLORADO 81611 • 970/925-6587 • FAX: 970/925-5180
•
•
James Lindt
May 14, 2001
Page 2
Section 26.445.100 B of the Aspen Land Use Regulations provides for
the Planning and Zoning Commission to consider PUD amendments when
the cannot be approved by the Planning Director.
Standard a.
The amendment must be a clarification or a technical
correction to the plat.
Standard b.
The amendment must not change the use of the proposed
development between residential, commercial and tourist
accommodations uses.
Standard c.
The amendment must be consistent with action taken during the
review of the original development and does not constitute new
land development activity.
Standard d.i.
The proposed activity does not change the basic character of
the approved use land on which the activity occurs including
the basic visual appearance and method of operation.
Standard d.ii.
The proposed activity does not increase off -site impacts in
the surrounding neighborhood.
Standard d.iii.
The proposed activity does not endanger public health, safety
or welfare.
Standard d.iv.
The proposed activity does not substantially increase the need
for on -site parking or utilities, or affect affordable housing
generation.
Standard d.v.
The proposed activity does not increase the floor area of the
use by more than two (2) percent or decrease open space on the
site by more than three (3) percent.
•
•
James Lindt
May 14, 2001
Page 3
SUMMARY
The applicant is seeking an amendment to the Moore PUD to amend the
Moore PUD Guide to vary the height restriction for Lot 27e. A
maximum height of 17 feet is requested. The following materials
are attached to this letter for your information.
Attachment 1: Attachment 1, Vicinity map (Moore PUD Final
Plat page 3/9)
Attachment 2: Moore Family PUD Final Plat page 4/9,
Attachment 3: November 16, 2000 letter from Augie Reno,
Architect to Matt Stokes, which verifies the
height of all seven structures located in
Moore Family PUD Block A
Attachment 4: Letter signed by Joanna Schaffner verifying
the height of structures in Block A.
Attachment 5: Moore PUD Guide page 21 of 40 which depicts
the typical unit for Lots 25e - 31e
Attachment 6: Lot 27e height calculation for the existing
house
Attachment 7: Letter from the Zoom Flume LLC authorizing the
Davis Horn Incorporated to submit a land use
application to the City of Aspen
Attachment 8: Fee Agreement
Attachment 9: Pre -application Summary Sheet
Attachment 10: List of Property Owners within 300 Feet
Please contact me at 925-6587 if I can provide any additional
information and or materials. Thank you for your assistance.
Sincerely,
D HOR INCORPORATED
G HO ICP
Moore.8
A
06'MCr
lain
W
I� • g
/ v' 31
^pp
q0^�I�AOAq
��nn
^ppbh"fgqM1M1
NN^A_b'1NOO
V�:
vv��pppppp
�Op'fM1pp'�-Z
O
NOh'1b
NN
"
Opcp
p
O
OOh'l rO,OhO7'1
ryry
��ffb^
,^-h=^nb
`OaRRM1M1�hv
t��lhhhb^hhbM1AM1
i
i
i
m
Z..�
Ln
1
`�
� R b•
,6S OZf� M .Dr, ►4.66 S '
r
vlo b.l
ad a I \ ?
3
I
0 0f l ,0A
_ \ \ On I j J
q
�b •
M .90-,9S.6.7 N 917
0
o y
V I
_ Q) 3 I
o ,•, I I
_ I
--V10
h
�a
Np&
ooz =. r 37VOS
i .
'bt°hY^fOp�phYhyhy���I
b'pp1�'fYhY�
tiO+Yp�O��p�+M�hyQih
hh
t,,J
Ni
t)1y��,
�i
2N��22Nh��N
b♦
A+b
b'f
ovff bbnnMh=n
'fwY�+b1tlpppp
h'b+
hhbN
OO-hhh^P.
+
b�p
YiCpM
^tiffY�
�c"�E�u�
888888.R
8a
a
m;;OR
ON
SbQ�='Ihb�=^pT-�YtNrytl
^Yv��pppp^iOOoYn�"n
ltipppp
�11
UV
�y'1�^ppqqO
UUUVUUVI,UV
h�bb^bq0^
Vt,VUI"iV
TW
a
U
Z
s
o 00 °
��N Z °
O ? °xCl)
In ono
)
W
U3 �Ln I o
W In o
° O oa,"
2 3 tag
O co v a
Lo Vim¢
W
2�
W IR
V�
� W
U �
N
31S 8661 rr 'o 91 C 6" ". r'. _ , .
a
AC
�n
M
uj
-g\Oce off, s
i 'rd enJ8\09
'i
1 1.p
t5 P0�
�/) <10te .10r5 001) r 6 dOr9
/ ��0� � �� P' 1 ` N %rpd'���/ N \ pS�e°cA fir•/ v� b
1
j b r /
H I P t PUi
\o i
C J L i 2 Q •/ / iq q4 i.Gana.r
— y
i,LL.wIM o i /a / a h a,
OOL l 37VOS o ry
U A
x is
U pp
Hoo
E o o E � :.aryrr .errs '
boao
I �
Y V
�T70 �10
e � �
11
l
— 1,4rN
O
ag
GIN -1O moo^ —
a�a
�s�a
assa
Rao?�
a
s.,
p 'Aq
"'8ss
8
as
_
as
ss
- -
---3795'
35
5
333
Y;??
s.s•;3
�
w
�
€
N i5
+.arnwl
iogmar
ri
.ni„
1dn�J
N
�
�411
~
Ci
O
N
C
0c)
0
Q� wQ'
~ ppa�w
•q4.
rr
�
°
� o
r
O
u Q
N y
aft � M V N / N
S
y a,try
t�gy 5�1N'
e
l
� I
4
N
v,
o t O rrC7
4
00
0 O
L �
d
pooly *99-0 uoojo/y
88
-�,-big
AP
MINE
R:a
3?
T
shqa;ta.,�
-
8
•ss
??RR=
8
ae
N s
:�,
xa
a
_Y
Ya
W
��a,Y-h�hL.j;{�``�_{{
qrrJJ.. [@j7a
?
4N•ry
-ryk
[p{'
ss�Y_-��@�g-
N�NFNa
l(2�L
iNN
N�Z�ZZ�'�iZ
Ni-����Z�
8R
"dbagsatiaa�='^Ra
Y$Yq
$-R$:28888'"8g
a$8$shh
Y
H
'
WV
^9sa.
s-�
s
sRaao�tR�
8A`t
,s_aag
ha
aa�
aRR
-�ti-s�a�
?
R-
•,>_
a
$
Y!
__Y,
5R
ry$
EH
as
Y
e�$
o$
sas•
8 R
o
8
88
88'tl88888888Ram
RRR
8888
8888888888
88
88
888888
��R8�7�1'R"Bg��R��^��tkR-�8ER�gt�aY-t��RC�B�R?Ih5";^R
E�k
8+1R8^
rn a
la.iail pl ri l��1 .uin.t mold) iui 'WIS 8F61 " of :i YO fin, ,,H 5., v11 a.,nw\l�^iN.tF�c� 1
1—
uul- —
3
D
In
I
•
a
d)
r l(-) )C)OC)
117
.�
---�------tom
mmi
1mm
\ =L
ILI Ill
ca Y t[)
O v
z L v)
I 'ID-v
tYzzO
OII� n�
OvId
<av�ol-
zill V 0 5
IL
v
v tf II_ ILI Z
z
O
I1
Ul
=1
I
I-
r�
IU
`C
1
10
�I
A
IT
w
'1
a
1,
L£-Si S1O1 HOA llNn 1dOldAl
oNlsnoH alevaaod:jv •0•n'd 3aoow
00 llNnOO NIAlId WO N eve 0 00'j0Z a 0i do TZ
IAMS SIAUO Md d6I s 1 O 9061/01/90 LOM
II11111111111 III IIIIII I1111 IN 111111111111111111111111
In
•
•
z z Ui v
OUO�
v v= X
1L z d3 CA
Opi� zp
D-' kD Z
J
�Z jCjIL_
O _ UJ
n_ U) :L
1- ) v
J IY- I
?- r
d�Id
� v
'z
D n
Q
VVVVAV
n
I
l
9
July 9, 2001
Steve Clay
Community Development Department
AUGUST
130 South Galena Street
REND
Aspen, CO 81611 AIA
RE: Lot 27E Bus Barn Lane SCOTT
SMITH
Dear Steve, ALA
The "B" affordable housing units as designed for placement on Bus
Barn Lane were limited in height due to the restrictions imposed by the
P. U. D. The allowable height was to be a maximum of 16' as measured
by the Pitkin County Land Use Code in effect as of the granting of the ;r_,-�
P. U. D. This measurement is taken at the midpoint of the roof and is
combined with several other limitations as explained in the land use
R ENO SMITH
code. I L L. C.
III
These houses were designed to be placed on seven lots and as such were
designed to be approximately 6" under the maximum allowable height 210 E. HYMAN
allowing some flexibility as to placement on the site. The civil engineer N" 202
then developed the site by designing the road, utilities, grading and
placing the homes on the various lots. ASPEN
COLORADO
Due to grading considerations the street was laid out in a fashion so as 81611
to allow for proper drainage of all the home sites and the street. Upon
placing the houses on the sites it was discovered that all of the building 97o.92s.s9c,8
heights worked within this height limitation with the exception of Lot FAC S I M I LE
27e qno this house is in compliance at the rear (Meadowwood side) 970.925.5993
elevoipa. The site then slopes down toward the front (street) and the
house is then 10 3/4" over that allowed by the P.U.D. E-MAIL
officeClrenosmith.com
Respectfully,
0371 SOUTHSIDE DRIVE
BASALT
Lei Alan Letson COLORADO
81621
970.927.6834
FACSIMILE
970.927.6840
•
40
qb
ARTICLE VII
HEIGHT LIMITATIONS
1. Dwelling Units. All dwelling units, except those to be
constructed on Lots 25e through 31e, Block A, Moore Family PUD
Final Plat, are limited to maximum height of 28 feet.
2. Affordable Housing DwellingDWelling Units. The dwelling units
located on Lots 25e through 31e, Block A, Moore Family PUD Final
Plat, are limited to a maximum height of 16 feet.
3. Ski Club Building. The Ski Club building to be located
on Block B, Moore Family PUD Final Plat, is limited to a maximum
height of 28 feet.
4. Ski Lift Towers. The ski lift towers are limited to a
maximum height of 40 feet.
ARTICLE VIII
BUILDING SETBACKS
All development, including grading, shall be contained
within the building envelopes, with the exception of grading
necessary for driveways and driveway retaining walls, roads as
depicted on the Detailed Submission grading plans, and berms and
landscaping in open Space Area 9.
ARTICLE I%
DRIVEWAYS
Driveways, grading associated with driveways and driveway
retaining walls for the sole purpose of driveway construction are
permitted outside building envelopes between the lot access point
and the designated building envelopes. Driveway retaining walls
located outside the building envelope shall not exceed six (6)
feet in height. Stepped -back or terraced wall structures with
ample planting pockets are to be used where grade changes exceed
six feet. Decorative walls located outside the building
envelope, not used for retainage, are prohibited.
ARTICLEX
MINIMUM LOT WIDTH
The minimum lot width is established on the Moore Family PUD
Final Plat.
ARTICLE XT
MINrD[UM LOT SIZE
Minimum lot size is established on the Moore Family PUD
Final Plat.
-7- 111111111111HIM 111111111111111111111III11111IN1111
420467 08/10/1998 04t19P PUD DAVIS SILVI
7 of 40 R 201.00 D 0.00 N 0.00 PITKIN COUNTY CO
r4ay-11-01 09:25A yuse : horn 970 925 5180 P_03
•
ATTACHMENT ____1___..
MATTHEW V. STOKES
ZOOM FLUME LLC
BOX 5115
ASPEN, COLORADO 81611
970-920-1710
May 11, 2001
James Lindt
Aspen Pitkin Community Development Department
130 South Galena Street
Aspen, Colorado 81611
Re: Moore Family PUD: PUD Guide Amendment
Dear James:
`Loom Flume LLC is the developer of the Moore Family PUD. Thies
letter authorizes Davis Hurn Incorporated to prepare a PUD
amendment land use application on our behalf and represent us iti
Che City of. Aspen land use process. The application proposes an
amendment. Lo the PUD Guide for Block A.
Thanks.
Sincerely,
14 �
MATTHEW V. STOKES
ASSISTANT CONSTRUCTION MANAGER
ZOOM FLUME LLC
May-11-01 09:25A yusem horn 970 925 5180 P_05
ATTACHMENT
ASPS•,N/PITKIN
COMMUNITY r)EVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT
Agreement for Payment of City of Asju,n Development Application rocs
CITY OF ASPEN (hereinafter CITY) and 2 ca o..-._ �_ 1 � rr+ L L— ` C_
(hereinafter APPLICANT) AGREE AS FOLI.OWS-
i . APPLICANT hus submittal to C:11 Y an application for
(lereinafter, TIIG PROIECI). \� ;�►1T l.: •-r- _ 0 0 licc-
2. APPLICANT understnnds end a -tees that City of Aspen Ordinance No. 49 (Series of 1099)
establishes a fie structure for Land Use application. and the psi anent of all processing fees is a condition precedent
to a determination of appiical.ion cotnplcttness.
3. APPLICANT and CITY agree chat hcc®usc of the size, native or scope of the proposed project, it
is not possible at this time to ascertain the full extent of tlhc costs involved in processing the application.
APPLICANT and CiTY further 3grce that it is in the interest of the parries that APPLICANT make payment of an
initial deposit and to thereafter permit additional cost., to be billed to APPLICANT on a monthly basis.
APPLICANT agrees additional costs tnay accrue following their hearings and/or approvals. APPLICANT agrees he
witl be benefited by retaining greater cash liquidity and will snake additional payments upon notification by the
CITY when they are necessary as costs arc incurrecl_ Cl f Y agrees it will be benefited through the greater certainty
of recovering its fall costs to process APPLICANT", application.
4. CITY and APPLICANT further agree that it is impracticable for CITY stiff to complete
processing er Present Sufficient information to the Planning Commission and/or City Council to cnoble the Flanning
Cotntnission andlor City Council to make k:gnlly rcquirt:d findings for project consideration, unless current billiaes
are paid in full prior to decision.
5. Therefore; APPLICANT ncm e" that in consideration of the CITY's waiver of ity right to collect
full fees prior to a determination of application compit ienk;ss, APPLICANT shall pay an initial deposit in the
amount of S k—L oS _ which is for _ hours of Community Development staff time, and if actunl
recorded costs exceed tho initial deposit. APPLICANT shall pay additional monthly billings to CITY to cehuburse
the CiTY for the processing of the application mentioned above, including post approval review. Such Pcriudic
payutcnts shall be inade within 30 days of the billing date. APPIICANT further agrees that failure to pay such
acctucd costs shall be grounds for suspension of pruccssinw .and in no case will building permits be issued until all
cOSts associated with case processing have been paid.
CITY Or ASPEN
By; --
Julie Ann Woods
Community Dcvelopment Director
g:\cupport\forms\agrpaysts.doc
12/2 7199
APPLICANT
By:
Date: �� t
rtailinit Address:
3-_.>x SSI t S7
G✓1 , r_.,� � l 6 11
I'IHY-UC-0001 WtU 1U:Uu fill rHA NU. r. uC
• 0 ATTACMEUi
CITY OF ASPEN
PRE -APPLICATION CONFERENCE SUMMARY
PLANNER: James Lindt, 920.5441
13a'iE: 52.01
PROJECT: Moore Plan►led Unit Development Amendment
R1rpRESE.NTATIVE; Glenn:Iorn
OWNER: 1 lines
TYPE OP APPLICATION: PUD Amendment
DESCRIPTION: PUD Amendment to change the PUD Height Requirement for 003ti Bus Barn lane
Affordable Ilousing Unit by 10 inches.
Land Use Code Section(s)
Amendment of PUD development order.
t
Review by: Staff for complete application, referral
and Zoning Comtnisslionlfoaa public hearing
26.4�5.100(B) if Planning
make recommendation to the Planning
and Zoning Commission denies request, applicant can appeal the decision to City Council.
Public Hearing: Yes. Planning and Zoning Commission
Referral Agencies: Engineering
Planning Fees: Planning Deposit $1205
Referral Fees:
Total Deposit'. $1205
To apply, submit the following information:
1 Total Deposit for review of application.
2. Applicant's name, address and telephone number, contained there entati eleer authorized to act oil behalf of the
stating the name, address, and telephone number of P
applicant.
3_ Signed fee agreement.
4, Pre -application Conference Summary,
5, An 8 1/2" x 11" vicinity map locating
a between built e subject elevatiot stle City and of Aspen.
elevations of the unit.
6, Elevation Drawings showing difference
6. A written description of the proposal and a writ lee explanation
n cn of how
cattvn posed development
complies with the review standards relevant to P ltcation.
7. Application materials set forth in in submissoeont orequirements to 1 ed land used e application_
S. Application materials set forth in specific submission
g. Copies of the complete application packet (items 1-8)
Process: at 0
Apply_ Planner checks application for completenessf rCfcrralscomtnents�Staff assignDs appl cal't public
Standards. Application taken to DRC for City Department
hearing date. The Community Development staff gives recommendation to Planning and Zoning Commission
for public hearing.
uiscisimcr: is
The foregoing summary is adv'ssory in nature only and
hatt mayg on hor ro y not be ac
curate. e. The summary mmary does not gcreare a is
subject to change in the future, and upon factual rep
legal or vested right.
11111 11 LVV1 111v U"-'A fl l 1 llil JIV. I I Vl
ATTACHMENT I D
SUBJECT: BUS BARN LANE LOTS
LIST OF OWNERS
WITHIN 300 FEET OF SUBJECT
Thomas F. Schultze & Elizabeth Carter
Walter Hampel
PUB 1539
0290 Heather Lane
Aspen CO 81612-1539
Aspen CO 81611
Linda Wachner
Marshall Workman & Melinda
200 E. 65`h Street
McConnell
New York NY 10021
14 Bus Barn Lane
Aspen CO 81611
Gerald & Eleanor
0165 Ilcather Lane
Schlomo Ben-Hamoo
Aspen CO 81611
15 Bus Barn Lane
Aspen CO 81611
Tom & Cheryl Lemons
187 Heather Lane
John & Judy Boyd
Aspen CO 81611
67 Bus Barn Lane
Aspen CO 81611
Judi Francis Trust
0201 Heather Lane
Kelley & Johanne Brenninger
Aspen CO 81611
75 Bus Barn Lane
Aspen CO 81611
Perry Pollock
POB 950
Michael & Cecelia Martin
Aspen CO 81612-0950
74 Bus Barn Lane
Aspen CO 81611
Jane Jenkins
POB 4152
Michael & Lisa O'Sullivan
Aspen CO 81612-4152
66 Bus Barn Lane
Aspen CO 81611
Hugh & Mary Wise
0252 Heather Lane
7oomc Flume, Inc.
Aspen CO 81611
P013 5115
Aspen CO 81612-5115
Robert Ashley & Carolyn Bolz Glah
0270 Heather Lane
Aspen School District
Aspen CO 81611
0235 High School Road
Aspen CO 81611
Jerry Bruce Gray
0293 Heather Lane
Pitkin County
Aspen CO 81611
Open Space
530 E. Main Street, Suite 302
Aspen CO 81611