The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutLand Use Case.CA.308 E Hopkins Ave.0005.2007.ASLU308 E HOPKINS 0005.2007.ASLU LU CODE INTER io?" I I Y�,bx a )�- --6A • 0 �� COMMUNITY �I✓DEVELOPMENT CITY OFASPEN r�5L,V CASE NUMBER 0005 2007.&HPE PROJECT ADDRESS 308 E HOPKINS AVE PARCEL ID 273512437006 PLANNER AMY SIMON CASE DESCRIPTION CODE INTEREPTION REPRESENTATIVE LENNIE OATES DATE OF FINAL JAN 25 2007 ACTION CLOSED BY ANGELA SCOREY Fife [del Record Navigate Fgrm Reports Format Tab Help _ lump 1 Main � Custom Fods Fees 84ctions Parcels Roying Status Fee Summary Routing Htstoy Attachments Permit Type F.;Z— span Land Use 2004 — Permit p OM.2007.ASLU . _ Address 308 E HOPKINS AVE� J ApVS-Ae y coy ASPEN State (CO ) Zip 18161� 1 i -- :< PermitlnformaRwn__. s Master Permit Routing queue jaski06 Applbd �O1J16J2007 Project Status fpendinq'---�ppr Approved Description [Gi5 D USE CODE INTERPRETATION Issued Find Submitted LEONARD ATES! 20I 00 G Cork Rurinitg Days 1 0 Eapees �01h1/M Owner Last Name JN+ VENTURE LLC Fist Name PO BOX 9769 _ phone! 0776 ASPEN CO 81612 J Ownei Is Applicard" Applicant Last Name riM VENTURE LLC First Name PO BOX 8769 Phone ;(970) 920-1776 Cust 0 !2729t __.. ;ASPEN CO 81612 Lender Last Name Frio Name Pl-,one Enter the master permit number AspenGoOb) Record 1 of 1 L� CITY OF ASPEN COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT LAND USE CODE INTERPRETATION JURISDICTION: City of Aspen APPLICABLE CODE SECTIONS: 26.415.030 26.415.060 26.415.080 EFFECTIVE DATE: January 25, 2007 WRITTEN BY: Chris Bendon, Community Development Director APPROVED BY: Chris Bendon, Date: January 25, 2007 Community Development Director COPIES TO: City Attorney City Planning staff SUMMARY: This Land Use Code interpretation clarifies the meaning of Sections 26.415.030, 26.415.060, and 26.415.080. The interpretation request was filed by Attorney Leonard Oates on behalf of JW Ventures LLC, owner of property located at 308 E. Hopkins Avenue, Aspen, Colorado, formerly occupied by La Cocina Restaurant. BACKGROUND: On January 23, 2006, an application for Major Development (Conceptual), Demolition, Commercial Design Review, and View Plane Review was submitted for consideration by the Aspen Historic Preservation Commission (HPC). HPC approved the project with conditions, including the condition that the applicant return for Final review within one year. An application has not been submitted for Final, but presumably will be once the applicant completes their other review step, Growth Management Review. To staff's recollection, the applicant visited the Building Department on December 13tn, 2006 to inquire about submitting for a demolition permit of the La Cocina building. The Historic Preservation Officer indicated to Claude Salter of the Building Department that the applicant had not completed the reviews necessary to submit for demolition permit. Demolition of the building at 308 E. Hopkins would not be prevented by the moratorium passed by Council in April 2006, Ordinance #19, Series of 2006 attached by reference, because the proposed work does would not increase FAR and would therefore be exempt. However, the Historic Preservation Officer found that no permit applications could be made because the project was still in a review process and no Development Order (final authorization to proceed) had been granted. 1 That evening, City Council passed an Emergency Ordinance, Ordinance #51, Series of 2006, attached by reference, prohibiting building permits in the Commercial Core. Even if 308 E. Hopkins Avenue had received a Development Order prior to that evening, the fact that the applicant did not submit for a building permit before the Ordinance became effective on December 14t' means that they are now prohibited from pursing the permit. The applicant apparently wanted to submit their application before the moratorium went into effect, but did not do so because staff indicated that they were not eligible until a Development Order is issued. The applicant has submitted a request for interpretation of several sections of the historic preservation regulations. The areas of interpretation requested by the owner of 308 E. Hopkins are that: 1. The property is not on the "Inventory of Historic Sites and Structures" within the City of Aspen; and 2. The provisions of Section 26.415.060 therefore do not apply to the demolition of the existing improvements on the property; and 3. The provisions of 26.415.080 are inapplicable to the request for a building permit for demolition of 308 E. Hopkins and a permit should issue. DISCUSSION 1. The property is not on the "Inventory of Historic Sites and Structures" within the City of Aspen. Ordinance #5, Series of 1972 (attached by reference) established the City's first historic preservation regulations, including the procedure for designation of historic districts and landmarks, the creation of the Historic Preservation Commission, and the empowerment of the Commission with the authority to review all proposed work in designated areas. Ordinance #49, Series of 1974 (attached by reference) made the Commercial Core, an area that includes the property that is the subject of this interpretation, a designated historic district. In 1980, the City completed the first comprehensive survey of historic structures throughout town, which resulted in a list referred to as the "Aspen Inventory of Historic Sites and Structures." Regulations for the preservation of all properties on the Inventory began to be adopted in 1986 and, for example, Ordinance #41, Series of 1986 (attached by reference) included a list of those properties on the Inventory. "Contributing" properties, which are sites in a historic district that have historic merit of their own, were indicated as being on the Inventory, but "non-contributing" properties, or sites which are part of the area where character preservation is to occur but which have not been determined to be historically significant themselves, were not named as being on the Inventory. The Inventory was reviewed, ratified, and amended several times after 1986 and only included the contributing sites. 2 It was therefore consistent with previous practice when 308 E. Hopkins Avenue was removed from the Inventory via Ordinance #6, Series of 2001 due to a finding that it did not retain historic integrity and was no longer a contributing historic resource. In 2002, the City adopted an entirely revised preservation ordinance. This ordinance defined the term "Aspen Inventory of Historic Landmark Sites and Structures" as follows: Section 26.415.030.A. Establishment of the Aspen Inventory of Historic Landmark Sites and Structures. The Aspen Inventory of Historic Landmarks Sites and Structures has been established by City Council to formally recognize those districts, buildings, structures, sites and objects located in Aspen that have special significance to the United States, Colorado or Aspen history, architecture, archaeology, engineering, or culture. The location of properties listed on the Inventory are indicated on maps on file with the Community Development Department. Staff interprets this code section to mean that historic districts are included on the "Aspen Inventory of Historic Landmark Sites and Structures." This finding is reinforced by other language such as: Section 26.415.030.C. The property owner(s), the Historic Preservation Commission (HPC) or the City Council may file an application for designation of a building, district, site, structure, or object on the Aspen Inventory of Historic Landmark Sites and Structures. The application for the designation of a property or collection ofproperties shall include the following... The Community Development Department displays a map of designated properties. The map depicts 308 E. Hopkins Avenue as being located with the Commercial Core Historic District. The Community Development Department also posts a list of the properties on the. Inventory on our website. This list does not include all of the non-contributing properties in the historic district, as should have been the case starting after the adoption of the new preservation ordinance in 2002. There is a process for the removal of a property from the Aspen Inventory of Historic Landmark Sites and Structures at Section 26.415.050. While 308 E. Hopkins was removed from the Inventory as it was defined at the time of de -listing, the Commercial Core Historic District as a whole has not been removed from the Inventory as it is defined today. INTERPRETATION Staff s interpretation is that 308 E. Hopkins Avenue is on the "Aspen Inventory of Historic Sites and Structures" by virtue of its location within a historic district. 3 2. The provisions of Section 26.415.060 do not apply to the demolition of the existing improvements on the property. Section 26.104.100 defines a "Historic Overlay District." Historic Overlay District, "H." An area or site designated and regulated for its historic architecture importance under Chapter 26.415 of this title. Properties in the historic district are subject to Chapter 26.415. Section 26.415.060 describes the effect of designation. 26.415.060 Effect of designation. A. Approvals required. Any development involving properties designated on the Aspen Inventory of Historic Landmark Sites and Structures, as an individual building or located in a historic district, unless determined exempt, requires the approval of a Development Order and either a Certificate of No Negative Effect or a Certificate of Appropriateness before a building permit or any other work authorization will be issued by the city. This code section requires all development located in a historic district to receive a Development Order and approval either in the form of a "Certificate of No Negative Effect," granted by staff, or a "Certificate of Appropriateness," granted by HPC. A Development Order is defined in Section 26.104.100 as follows: Development order. A written authorization issued pursuant to the terms of this Title to undertake development according to an approved site specific development plan. (See Common Development Review Procedures —section 26.304.070 Development Orders.) Section 26.304.070, cited in the above definition, notes that a Development Order is published after final approval of all necessary reviews. 26.304.070 Development orders. A. Publication of development approval. No later than fourteen (14) days following final approval of all requisite reviews necessary to obtain a development order as set forth in this title, the City Clerk shall cause to be published in a newspaper of general circulation within the jurisdictional boundaries of the City of Aspen, a notice advising the general public of the approval of a site specific development plan and creation of a vested property right pursuant to this Title. Such notice shall be substantially in the following form: Notice is hereby given to the general public of the approval of a site specific development plan, and the creation of a vested property right pursuant to the Land Use Code of the City of Aspen and Title 24, Article 68, Colorado Revised Statutes, pertaining to the following described property: [parcel address and legal 4 • description], by [ordinance or resolution] of the [City Council or other appropriate decision making body], numbered: [enter ordinance or resolution number]. INTERPRETATION: 308 E. Hopkins Avenue requires a number of reviews, some of which have not yet been completed. It is correct that demolition is not the sort of work reviewed for a ""Certificate of No Negative Effect" or a "Certificate of Appropriateness," however, demolition involving designated properties does require a Development Order, which has not been issued. Therefore, 26.415.060 Effect of designation does apply to demolition of existing improvements on the property. 3. The provisions of 26.415.080 are inapplicable to the request for a building permit for demolition of 308 E. Hopkins and a permit should issue. 26.415.080 Demolition of designated historic properties. It is the intent of this chapter to preserve the historic and architectural resources that have demonstrated significance to the community. Consequently no demolition of properties designated on the Aspen Inventory of Historic Landmark Sites and Structures will be allowed unless approved by the HPC in accordance with the standards set forth in this section. INTEPRETATION: It has been noted above that the historic district is included within the definition of the "Aspen Inventory of Historic Sites and Structures, therefore this section is applicable. HPC has approved demolition as part of the Conceptual level review of the project, however there are still review steps remaining before a Development Order is issued and a permit can be submitted. APPEAL OF DECISION Any person with a right to appeal an adverse decision or determination shall initiate an appeal by filing a notice of appeal on a form prescribed by the Community Development Director. The notice of appeal shall be filed with the Community Development Director and with the City office or department rendering the decision or determination within fourteen (14) days of the date of the decision or determination being appealed. Failure to file such notice of appeal within the prescribed time shall constitute a waiver of any rights under this Title to appeal any decision or determination. LEONARD M.OATES RICHARD A KNEZEVICH TED D. GARDENSWARTZ DAVID B KELLY OF COUNSEL JOHN T.KELLY MARIA MORROW ANNE MARIE MCPHEE LAW OFFICES OF OATES, KNEZEVICH & GARDENSWARTZ, P.C. PROFESSIONAL CORPORATION THIRD FLOOR, ASPEN PLAZA BUILDING 533E HOPKINSAVENUE ASPEN. COLORADO. 81611 January 5, 2007 Chris Bendon City of Aspen Community Development Department Director 130 S. Galena Aspen, CO 81611 TELEPHONE (970) 920-1700 FACSIMILE (970) 920-1121 Imo@okglaw com VIA HAND DELIVERY Re: Request for Planning Director Interpretation/Lots M & N, Block 80, City and Townsite of Aspen/308 E. Hopkins Avenue ("Property")IJW Ventures, LLC, Owner Dear Chris: This letter shall constitute a Request for Interpretation made pursuant to 26.210.02013.5 of the City of Aspen Land Use Code determining that the Property is not on the "Inventory of Historic Sites and Structures" within the City of Aspen, ("Inventory"), further determining that the provisions of Section 26.415.060 do not apply to the demolition of the existing improvements on the Property (the former "La Cocina" Restaurant), further determining that the provisions of 26.415.080 are inapplicable to the request of JW Ventures, LLC for a building permit for demolition of the now vacant existing improvements on the Property and that a building permit should issue for the demolition thereof. Attached hereto is: 1. A copy of a letter from me addressed to Amy Guthrie and John Worcester, Esq. dated December 19, 2006 and hand delivered with attachments. 2. A copy of Resolution No. 6, Series of 2001 of the Historic Preservation Commission of the City of Aspen, which specifically removed the Property from the Inventory. 3. Amy Guthrie's January 3, 2007 reply to my December 19, 2006 letter. No specific definition of either "Development or Demolition" is contained in 26.415.020 or the other subsections of 26.415. In 26.104.100 (the general definitions section of the Land Use Code) there are definitions for both. However, "Demolition" means razing, disassembling, tearing down or destroying of an existing structure "prior to commencing development" emphasis added. This is irreconcilably inconsistent C:\LMO Data & Forms\DataUients\Provine, John\JW Ventures, Purchase of LaCocina\Ltr to Bendon 1.3.07.doc • • with the definition of "Development" in that subsection. While 26.415.060 addresses properties on the Designated Inventory of Historic Sites and Structures or properties within historic districts in the City of Aspen, 26.415.080 dealing with demolition applies only to properties on the Designated Inventory of Sites and Structures. The Property was removed from the Inventory in 2001. Also, enclosed is the $50.00 application fee required for a Request for Interpretation by the City. It is the position of the Property owner, JW Ventures, LLC, that its application for a building permit to demolish the improvements on the Property was timely filed, illegally and improperly rejected by the City of Aspen Building Department at the specific direction of Amy Guthrie, that the same should have been accepted on the date the same was tendered to and rejected by the City of Aspen Building Department and a demolition permit issued thereon authorizing the demolition of the improvements on the Property. Very Truly Yours, OATES, KNEZEVICH & GARDENSWARTZ, P.C. Leonard M. Oates, attorney for JW Ventures, LLC Encl. LMO/bab CALMO Data & Forms\Data\Clients\Provine, John\JW Ventures, Purchase of LaCocina\Ltr to Bendon 1.3.07.doc N January 3, 2007 6 Lennie Oates THE CITY OF ASPEN Oates, Knezevich and Gardenswartz, P.C. 533 E. Hopkins Avenue Aspen, CO 81611 Re: 308 E. Hopkins Avenue, Demolition Permit Dear Lennie; It appears that we are in disagreement regarding the purview of the Aspen Historic Preservation Commission over the review of demolition applications for "non- contributing" buildings within the Commercial Core Historic District. We have previously discussed both the "Aspen Inventory of Historic Landmark Sites and Structures and Historic Districts" map, which depicts 308 E. Hopkins within the historic district, and we have discussed Section 26.415.030 of the Aspen Municipal Code, which states that the Inventory shall include districts designated by Aspen City Council. Properties listed on the Inventory are subject to the provisions of the Chapter 26.415 as a whole. In addition to the above citations, Section 26.415.060 states that "Any development involving properties designated on the Aspen Inventory of Historic Landmark Sites and Structures, as an individual building or located in a historic district, unless determined exempt, requires the approval of a Development Order and either a Certificate of No Negative Effect or a Certificate of Appropriateness before a building permit or any other work authorization will be issued by the City." The proposed project at 308 E. Hopkins Avenue has not been issued a Development Order or a Certificate of Appropriateness at this time and work cannot commence. The property will also be subject to Ordinance #51, Series of 2006 (a prohibition on most building permits in the Commercial Core) until said ordinance expires. 308 E. Hopkins is scheduled for Growth Management Review before the Planning and Zoning Commission on April 17th. We have not received any information related to submission of an HPC Final Review application, but would be happy to schedule that hearing as soon as complete materials are provided. Please let me know any further questions. Sincerely, Amy Guthrie Aspen Historic Preservation Officer -- - , —o 1 1. RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS 100 Leaves historic site: All of lots 80, 81, 82, 83, 87, 88, 89, 90, 93, 94, 95, 96, and the south half of blocks 79, 86 and 92 of the City and Original Townsite of Aspen; and the south half of Block 19 East Aspen Addition to the City of Aspen; and further that the Zoning District Map of the City of Aspen, dated April 7, 1967, as amended, is further amended by the designation of the preceeding as an H, Historic Overlay District. section 2 If any provisions of this ordinance, or applications thereof, shall be declared invalid, such invalidity shall not affect any other provisions or applications, and for this purpose the provisions and applications of this ordinance are declared to be severable. Section 3 A public hearing on this ordinance shall be held on 1c, C-C! `.� _ L ,� 1974, at 5 :00 p.m. in the City Council Chambers,City Hall, Aspen, Colorado, fifteen (15) days prior to which hearing there shall have been published notice of the same in a newspaper of general circulation of the City. INTRODUCED, READ AND ORDERED published all as provided by law by the City Council of the City of Aspen, Colorado, at its regular meeting held i %c•-u� .ti, „S" 1974. ATTEST: Stacy tandley III v Kathryn S�. liauter City Clerk RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS 100 Leaves ORDINANCE NO. �— (Series of 1974) AN ORDINANCE DESIGNATING THE COMMERCIAL CORE OF THE CITY OF ASPEN, MORE PARTICULARLY BLOCKS 80,81, 82, 83, 87, 88, 89, 90, 93, 94, 95, 96, AND THE SOUTH HALF OF BLOCKS 79, 86, 92 OF THE ORIGINAL TOWNSITE AND SOUTH HALF OF BLOCK 19 OF THE EAST ASPEN ADDITION THERETO,AS AN H, IIISTORIC DISTRICT WHEREAS, The Aspen Historic Preservation Committee has studied the commercial core of the City of Aspen and such investigation demonstrates, and the Committee has concluded, that the commercial core of the City has character, interest and value as a part of the development, heritage and cultural characteristics of the City; exemplifies the cultural, political, economic, social and historical heritage of the community; includes many structures which portray the environment of a group of people in an era of history characterized by a distinctive architectural style; and which structures, in addition, contain elements of design, detail, material and craftsmanship representing a significant architectural style; and WHEREAS, the City Council has found that designa- tion of the commercial core as an historic district will promote the health, safety and welfare of the present and future inhabitants of the community, NOW, THEREFORE BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ASPEN, COLORADO: Section 1 That the following described property located within Pitkin County, Colorado, be and hereby is placed within an H, Historic Overlay District and designated an STATE OF COLORADO ) CERTIFICATE ) ss COUNTY OF PITKIN ) I, Kathryn S. Hauter, City Clerk of Aspen, Colorado, do hereby certify that the above and foregoing ordinance was introduced, read in full, and passed on first reading at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Aspen on December 9 1974 , and publish- ed in the Aspen Times a weekly newspaper of general circul- ation, published in the City of Aspen, Colorado, in its issue of December 12 , 197 4 , and was finally adopted and approved at a regular meeting of the City Council on - December 23 Ordinance No. 49 provided by law. , 197 4 , and ordered published as , Series of 197 4 , of said City, as IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and the seal of said City of Aspen, Colorado, this 24 day of December 197 4 Kathryn S Hauter, City Clerk RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS 100 Leaves FINALLY PASSED, ADOPTED AND APPROVED this day of cc e— v- r / , 1974. Stacy Sidandley III ATTEST: 1 Kathf'yn.'S . Hauter City Clerk I "Vi „I 1 1,1 S OATES, KNF ZE%IC 14 & CTARDENSWARTZ, P.C. "'II f-YL,IC NAI. ��Jhl'�)Nn � ICN IN0 I G3( R. ASP[ N F'I_PLA h�UIL0IN(, ..; I- 11QV'K NS nbt NIA A:J F N ',G1_O +ADS) I., Nnl�Drn.inns n:I,A1 DAKNI. *�VICA Tf-'._(PMI,Nt-';; •;�•��•;-i;rli 'I 1) 1 R DAVIIi N KI : A •'A i;0I1N:4I .� �ii1N N'F I I'� -•.:'oN ::�N vri CAN Ir. Mi RRi W ..NNr IdA1n1 Mr;l K 6 December 19, 2006 VIA HAND -DELIVERY John Worcester, Esq. Amy Guthrie City of Aspen 130 South Galena Street Aspen, CO 81611 Re: Demolition Permit Rejection — JW Ventures, LLC/La Cocina Property (308 E. Hopkins Avenue) Dear John and Amy: John, Amy did give me a call back at your request. Based on that conversation, I still do not have a satisfactory answer to my question. Amy referred me to a GIS map entitled "Aspen Inventory of Landmark Sites and Historic Districts" (last updated: September 10, 2004) ("Map"). I have a copy of the Map and have reviewed it. While it is undisputed that the La Cocina property is within the Commercial Core Historic District, the La Cocina property is not shown on the Map as a Landmark Historic Site or Structure. Attached to this e-mail is the City of Aspen "The Aspen Inventory of Historic Landmark Sites and Structures" (Updated: July 2003). The La Cocina property which is 308 E. Hopkins Avenue is not contained on the Inventory. La Cocina was specifically delisted by Resolution No. 6 (2001) of the HPC. In answer to my inquiry, I still do not understand on what basis there can be for an interpretation that the La Cocina is on "The Aspen Inventory of Historic Landmark Sites and Structures" and therefore, subject to the demolition requirements contained in 26.415.080 of the Aspen Municipal Code when it clearly does not appear on that Map or Inventory. It would appear that Amy is attempting general application of the Inventory to all properties within the Commercial Core Historic District. What is the legal basis and documentation upon which the City, through Amy, relies in making such an application? JW Ventures, LLC applied for a demolition permit prior to the December 2006 moratorium. That application was not accepted for tiling on Amy's instructions. Min Worcester, Esq. Amy Guthrie December 19. 2006 Page 2 We believe the unwillingness to accept the application was improper. We expect a full explanation on sound footing to make an informed decision or a decision that JW Ventures' application should be accepted as of a date prior to the moratorium adopted in early December and a permit for demolition issued thereon. We believe HPC's review of demolition as a part of the recent conceptual review for redevelopment of the La Cocina property, was unnecessary and in error, in the context of 26.415.080. Very Truly Yours, OATES, KNEZEVICH & GARDENSWARTZ, P.C. M. LMO/klc Enclosure cc: Sunny Vann (via e-mail Charles Cunniffe (via e-mail) John Provine (via e-mail) Leonard M. Oates CALMO Data & Forms\Data\Clients\Provine, lohn\JW Ventures, Purchase of LaCocina\Ltr to Worcester & Guthrie 12-19-06 doc n n As:oc, ■L:■ , ■ � Uo. ' CC6 r, ■' ■� n■ CITY OF ASPEN "THE ASPEN INVENTORY OF HISTORIC LANDMARK SITES AND STRUCTURES" Updated July 2003 (THIS LIST IS PROVIDED AS GENERAL INFORMATION. SINCE IT IS POSSIBLE THAT STREET ADDRESS NUMBERS HAVE CHANGED, CALL AMY GUTHRIE, ASPEN HISTORIC PRESERVATION OFFICER, AT 920-5096 TO CONFIRM THE STATUS OF ANY PROPERTY WITHIN THE CITY WHEN IN DOUBT.) CONIMERCIAL CORE HISTORIC DISTRICT (Established 1974) 420 E. Cooper (Red Onion) (National Register) - Ord. 9-1982 501 E. Cooper (independence Building) - Ord 9-1982 529-531 E. Cooper - Ord 61-1992 104 S. Galena - Ord 16-1985 130 S. Galena (Armory City Hall) (National Register) - Ord 57-1981 203 S. Galena (Hyman -Brand Building) (National Register) - Ord 57-1981 210 S. Galena (Webber Block) (National Register) - Ord 49-1989 303 S. Galena (Aspen Block) - Ord 57-1981 312 S. Galena - Ord 57-1981 302 E. Hopkins - Ord 16-1985 309 E. Hopkins/200 S. Monarch - Ord 36-1990 316 E. Hopkins - Ord 1-1992 406 E. Hopkins - Ord. 58- 1996 300 E. Hyman - Ord 57-1981 328 E. Hyman (Wheeler Opera House) (National Register) - Ord 57-1981 413 E. Hyman (Riede's City Bakery) (National Register) - Ord 77-1981 428 E. Hyman - Ord 9-1982 501 E. Hyman (Ute City Building)/304-308 S. Galena (Arcades) - Ord 57-1981 and Ord 22-2001 303 E. Main - Ord 15-1994 309 E. Main - Ord 56-1989 310 E. Main - Ord 5-1987 315 E. Min - Ord 56-1989 330 E. Main - Ord 9-1982 506 E. Main - Ord 57-1981 533 E. Main (St. Mary's Church) - Ord 77-1981 100 S. Mill - Ord 5-1987 101 S. Mill - Ord 5-1987 204 S. Mill (Collins Block) (National Register) - Ord 9-1982 208 S. Mill - Ord 57-1981 MAIN STREET HISTORIC DISTRICT (Establisbed 1975) 128 E. Main - Ord 4-1985 201 E. Main- Ord SO-1986 202 E. Main - Ord 16-1985 208 E. Main - Ord 16-1985 216 E. Main - Ord 16-1985 125 W. Main - Ord 16-1985 132 W. Main - Ord 33-1994 & Ord 56-1976 J 135 W. Main - Ord 16-1995 211 W. Main - Ord 16-1995 300 W. Main - Ord 21-1988 320 W. Main (Smith-Elisha House) (;National Register) - Ord 56-1988 328 W. Main - Ord 57-1981 332 W. Main - Ord 9-1982 333 W. plain - Ord 5-1987 400 W. -Main - Ord 16-1995 430 W. Main - Ord 49-1989 500 W. Main - Ord 57-1981 612 W. Main - Ord 16-1985 616 W. plain- Ord 10-1996 627 W. Main - Ord 57-1979 633 W. Main - Ord 57-1979 706 W. Main - Ord 56-1989 709 W. Main - Ord 59-1994 734 W. Main (Sorenson's) - Ord 5-1987 Paepcke Park Gazebo - Ord 57-1981 DESIGNATED LANDMARKS LOCATED OUTSIDE OF THE HISTORIC DISTRICTS any address (Information followingindicates that an ordinance specifically designating that property was adopted. All other sites were listed on the "Aspen Inventory of Historic Landmark Sites and Structures" through one of the following: Ordinance #34, Series of 1992, Ordinance #4, Series of 1995, or Ordinance #5, Series of 1996.) Aspen Brewery Ruins Aspen Grove Cemetery Boat Tow and Lift 1 (National Register) - Tower, Skier Chalet - Ord 57-1981 710 S. Aspen 100 E. Bleeker - Ord 62-1989 110 E. Bleeker 126 E_ Bleeker - Ord 5-1985 134 E_ Bleeker - Ord 25-1992 200 E. Bleeker (Community Church) (National Register) - Ord 57-1981 209 E. Bleeker 214 E. Bleeker - Ord 7-1982 227 E. Bleeker 232 E. Bleeker 121 W. Bleeker 129 W. Bleeker 131 W. Bleeker - Ord 77-1981 205 W. Bleeker 213 W. Bleeker- Ord 10-2000 214 W. Bleeker - Ord 11-1991 r ,1 215 W. Bleeker - Ord 5-1987 217 W. Bleeker 233 W Bleeker 333 W. Bleeker (D-E. Frantz House) (National Register) - Ord 77-1981 442 W. Bleeker (Pioneer Park) (National Register) - Ord 7-1982, Ord 41- 1993 500 W. Bleeker - Ord 5-1987 513 W. Bleeker 620 W. Bleeker (Wheeler -Stallard House) (National Register) - Ord 57-1981 635 W. Bleeker 735 W. Bleeker, Ord 43-1998 720 Bay Street 118 E. Cooper - Ord 4-1982 124 E. Cooper 135 E. Cooper (Dixon -Markle House) (National Register) - Ord 77-1981 820 E. Cooper- Ord 51, 1995 824 E. Cooper 918 E. Cooper- Ord 7, 1996 935 E. Cooper 939 E. Cooper - Ord 2-1995 1000 E. Cooper 1006 E. Cooper- Ord 30-2000 1020 E. Cooper 1004 E. Durant #1 - Ord 32-1989 505 N. Eighth - Ord 4-1982 121 N. Fifth - Ord 77-1981 421 N. Fifth 308 N. First 414 N. First - Ord 57-1981 311 S. First 319 N. Fourth - Ord 77-1981 120 W. Francis 123 W. Francis - Ord 41-1995 126 W. Francis 135 W. Francis 201 W. Francis (Bowles -Cooley House) (National Register) - Ord 7-1982 202 W. Francis 234 W. Francis (Davis Waite House) (National Register) - Ord 7-1992 420 W. Francis - Ord 5-1987 432 W. Francis (Hallet House) (National Register) - Ord 77-1981 500 W. Francis - Ord 4-1982 522 W. Francis 523 W. Francis 533 W. Francis 700 W. Francis - Ord 10-1992 712 W. Francis 4 716 W. Francis - Ord 11-1992 209 S. Galena 860 Gibson 980 Gibson 990 Gibson 311 Gillespie/710 N. Third - Ord 7-1982 314 Gillespie 330 Gillespie 405 Gillespie/707 N. Third 515 Gillespie- Ord 20-2001 Glory Hole Park 101 E. Hallam- Ord 16-2001 105 E. Hallam 123 E. Hallam - Ord 4-1995 127 E. Hallam - Ord 78-1989 131 E. Hallam - Ord 77-1981 216 E. Hallam 223 E. Hallam 232 E. Hallam - Ord 4-1982 100 W. Hallam - Ord 4-1982 215 W. Hallam - Ord 62-1987 229 W. Hallam 233 W. Hallam 320 W. Hallam - Ord 4-1982 323 W. Hallam 334 W. Hallam - Ord 21-1988 403 W. Hallam 421 W. Hallam 504 W. Hallam 525 W. Hallam - Ord 46-1995 530 W. Hallam - Ord 7-1982 533 W. Hallam 610 W. Hallam- Ord 58-1994 620 W. Hallam - Ord 11-1991 716 W. Hallam 834 W. Hallam (Poppies) - Ord 56-93 920 W. Hallam- Ord 23- 1998 113 E. Hopkins - Ord 77-1981 208 E. Hopkins - Ord 7-1982 214 E. Hopkins 530 E. Hopkins 532 E. Hopkins 534 E. Hopkins 623 E. Hopkins/625 E. Hopkins 635 E. Hopkins r 811 E. Hopkins 819 E. Hopkins 1008 E. Hopkins- Ord 18- 1997 134 W. Hopkins - Ord 21-1988 135 W. Hopkins 200 W. Hopkins 205 W. Hopkins 212 W. Hopkins - Ord 26-1988 222 W. Hopkins - Ord 77-1981 419 E. Hyman- Ord 17-2001 325 W. Hopkins 201 E. Hyman - Ord 7-1982 314 E. Hyman 432 E. Hyman 920 E. Hyman- Ord 1- 1999 935 E. Hyman - Ord 30-1996, Lot 1 990 E. Hyman 214 W. Hyman 216 W. Hyman 107 Juan 930 King- Ord.20-I998 935 King 206 Lake (Newberry House) (National Register) - Ord 57-1981 2 10 Lake - Ord 28-1980 212 Lake - Ord 17-1980 220 Lake - Ord 10-1991 240 Lake- Ord 15-1998 320 Lake - Ord 77-1981 330 Lake- Ord 4 - 2000 221 E. Main 227 E. Main 540 E. Main 205 W. Main 518 W. Main 501 W. Main 604 W_ Main 611 W. Main 701 W. Main 835 W. Main - (Bruce Berger)- Ord 50- 1993 Marolt Barns Site and Lixiviation Plant Ruins (National Register) - Ord 45-1988 Maroon Creek Bridge 920 Matchless 930 Matchless 950 Matchless- Ord 28- 1998 The Meadows 6 .-- 590 N. Mill (Holy Cross Building) - Ord 51-1981 202 N. Monarch 212 N. Monarch - Ord 57-1981 218 N. Monarch - Ord 77-1981 101 S. Monarch 114 Neale aka 17 Queen- Ord 17-1990 311 North - Ord 79-1992 401 North 500 North - Ord 77-1981 Opal Marolt House (40176 Highway 82) 309 Park 328 Park- Ord 15-2001 333 Park 401 Park 1680 Power Plant (City Shop) - Ord 21-1992 101 Puppy Smith Red Butte Cemetery 423 N. Second - Ord 77-1981 525 N. Second (Shilling -Lamb House) (National Register) - Ord 77-1981 Sheeley Bridge 117 N. Sixth- Ord 48- 1998 229 W. Smuggler/426 N. 2°d- Ord 40-1999 400 W. Smuggler - Ord 77-1981 406 W. Smuggler - Ord 49-1989 434 W. Smuggler 513 W. Smuggler - Ord 77-1981 609 W. Smuggler 610 W. Smug9ler/505 N. Sth- Ord 77-1981 & Ord 5-2001 629 W. Smuggler 715 W. Smuggler - Ord 77-1981 470 N. Spring 514 N. Third - Ord 32-1989 610 N. Third - Ord 4-1982 620 N_ Third 640 N. Third- Ord 18-2001 701 N. Third 205 S. Third (Matthew Callahan Log Cabin) (National Register) - Ord 77-1981 520 Walnut - Ord 48-1994 Triangle Park - Ord. 4-1982 1280 Ute Ute Cemetery - Ord 57-1981 557 Walnut 2 William's Way I111111IIIII tlllll I11111III 452717 03/26/2901 02:38P 1 of 2 R 10.00 D 0.00 N 111111111 III 111111111 IN RESOLUTI DAVIS SILVI 0.00 PITKIN COUNTY CO RESOLUTION NO. _6_, SERIES OF 2001 RESOLUTION OF THE ASPEN HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION TO REMOVE THE LA CACINA RESTAURANT, LOCATED AT 308 EAST HOPKINS AVENUE, LOTS M AND N, BLOCK 80, CITY AND TOWNSITE OF ASPEN, FROM THE INVENTORY OF HISTORIC SITES AND STRUCTURES Parcel ID: 2 73 7-0 73-29-00 7 WHEREAS, the Community Development Department has conducted an evaluation of the City of Aspen "Inventory of Historic Sites and Structures" to identify any properties which should be removed from the inventory due to loss of integrity, to nominate any sites which should be added to the inventory, and to rate the resources using the terms "significant," "contributing," and "supporting;" and WHEREAS, the Community Development Department has forwarded a recommendation to the Historic Preservation Commission; and WHEREAS, Section 26.420.080 of the Land Use Code provides guidance on evaluation of the inventory. According to that passage, the Inventory shall include all structures in the City of Aspen which are at least fifty (50) years old and which continue to have historic value, and such other structures identified by the Historic Preservation Commission as being outstanding examples of more modern architecture; and WHEREAS, Section 26.420.080 of the Land Use Code also requires that all structures on the inventory be evaluated by the Historic Preservation Commission regarding their current architectural integrity, historic significance, and community and neighborhood influence and be categorized as "significant," "contributing," or "supporting;" and WHEREAS, Staff provided the Historic Preservation Commission with the Community Development Department's recommendations regarding 308 East Hopkins Avenue, a property currently listed on the inventory; and - - WHEREAS, at a regular meeting on February 14`h, 2001, the Historic Preservation Commission considered the staff recommendation, and approved this resolution by a vote of four to two, (4 to 2) to remove 308 East Hopkins Avenue from Aspen's Inventory of Sites and Structures finding that the structure does not meet the review criteria pursuant to Section 26.420.080. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED: That the HPC finds that the standards and review criteria established in Section 26.420.080 of the Land Use Code are not met and that 308 East Hopkins Avenue, Lots M and N, Block 80, City and Townsite of Aspen, shall be removed from the "Inventory of Historic Sites and Structures. APPROVED BY THE COMMISSION at its regular meeting on the 14th day of February, 2001. Approved as to Form: . I-L- Davi Hoefer, Assistant Citf Attorney Approved as to Content: HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION Acting Vice -Chair ATTEST: i Kathy 4,Stricnd, Chief Deputy 1111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111 452717 03/26/2001 02:38P RESOLUTI DAVIS SILVI 2 of 2 R 10.00 0 0.00 N 0.00 PITKIN COUNTY CO