HomeMy WebLinkAboutagenda.apz.202203011
AGENDA
ASPEN PLANNING & ZONING COMMISSION
March 1, 2022
4:30 PM, WebEx Virtual Meeting (See agenda packet for
instructions to join the meeting)
I.VIRTUAL MEETING INSTRUCTIONS
TO JOIN ONLINE:
Go to www.webex.com and click on "Join a Meeting"
Enter Meeting Number: 2553 911 4862
Enter Password: 81611
Click "Join Meeting"
-- OR --
JOIN BY PHONE
Call: 1-408-418-9388
Enter Meeting Number: 2553 911 4862
Enter Password: 81611
II.ROLL CALL
III.COMMENTS
IV.MINUTES
IV.A.Draft Meeting Minutes for February 15, 2022
minutes.apz.20220215.docx
V.DECLARATION OF CONFLICT OF INTEREST
VI.PUBLIC HEARINGS
VI.A.Aspen Mini-Storage Property, 105 AABC
Recommendation to City Council
Annexation and Initial Zoning, including a Planned Development Overlay
Aspen Mini Storage_Memo.pdf
Resolution No. XX_Series of 2022_Mini Storage Facility.docx
Exhibit A.1_Annexation Criteria.docx
Exhibit A.2_Amendments to the Land Use Code & Official Zone District Map_Storage
Facility.docx
Exhibit A.3_Planned Development-Project Review_Mini Storage.docx
1
2
Exhibit B__Application.pdf
Exhibit C_Annexation Map.pdf
Exhibit D_PD Site Plan.pdf
Exhibit E_ Draft Ordinances for Council.pdf
Exhibit F_Public Notice Affidavits.pdf
VII.OTHER BUSINESS
VII.A.Discussion of board powers and duties, and meeting procedures
VIII.ADJOURN
TYPICAL PROCEEDING FORMAT FOR ALL PUBLIC HEARINGS
1) Conflicts of Interest (handled at beginning of agenda)
2) Provide proof of legal notice (affidavit of notice for PH)
3) Staff presentation
4) Board questions and clarifications of staff
5) Applicant presentation
6) Board questions and clarifications of applicant
7) Public comments
8) Board questions and clarifications relating to public comments
9) Close public comment portion of bearing
10) Staff rebuttal/clarification of evidence presented by applicant and public comment
11) Applicant rebuttal/clarification
End of fact finding.
Deliberation by the commission commences.
No further interaction between commission and staff, applicant or public
12) Chairperson identified the issues to be discussed among commissioners.
13) Discussion between commissioners*
14) Motion*
*Make sure the discussion and motion includes what criteria are met or not met
Revised January 9, 2021
2
Minutes Aspen Planning and Zoning Commission February 15, 2022
Page 1 of 7
Chairperson McGovern called the regular Planning and Zoning (P&Z) meeting for February 1
st, 2022 to
order at 4:30 PM.
Commissioners in attendance: Ruth Carver, Sam Rose, Brittanie Rockhill, Spencer McKnight, Teraissa
McGovern.
Commissioners not in attendance: Scott Marcoux
Staff in Attendance:
Amy Simon, Planning Director
Ben Anderson, Principal Long-Range Planner
Jeff Barnhill, Planner
Kate Johnson, Assistant City Attorney
Cindy Klob, Records Manager
COMMISSIONER COMMENTS
None
STAFF COMMENTS
None
PUBLIC COMMENTS
None
APPROVAL OF MINUTES
Ms. McGovern requested Ms. Bonfils-Thibault’s name be corrected on page 1. Mr. Rose motioned to
approve the minutes for January 18, 2022 and was seconded by Mr. McKnight. Ms. McGovern requested
a roll call: Ms. Carver, yes; Mr. Rose, yes; Ms. Rockhill, yes; Ms. McGovern, yes; and Mr. McKnight, yes;
for a total of five (5) in favor – zero (0) not in favor. The motion passed.
DECLARATION OF CONFLICT OF INTEREST
None
PUBLIC HEARINGS
None
OTHER BUSINESS
Ms. Johnson stated the meeting was properly noticed and notices were not necessary for the items on
the agenda.
Requests to Pay Fee-in-Lieu in Providing Affordable Housing Mitigation Recommendation to
City Council
Ms. McGovern then opened the item and turned the floor over to staff.
Mr. Ben Anderson, Planner, reviewed the history of the Affordable Housing Certificates Program and the
current challenges to those only requiring minimal mitigation. He then stated for the first time in the
3
Minutes Aspen Planning and Zoning Commission February 15, 2022
Page 2 of 7
history of the program, there have been requests from applicants to pay the fee-in-lieu (FIL) above the
0.1 Full Time Equivalent (FTE) threshold as identified in the agenda packet. Staff has confirmed there are
certificates that have not been extinguished, but the certificate holders have plans for the certificates
and they are not available for others to use as mitigation. Staff has established a quarterly batch review
process for projects to be considered because the projects have slightly over the 0.1 FTE mitigation that
can be paid in cash by right.
Mr. Anderson stated City Council will consider these requests on March 8th and is requesting P&Z
provide their recommendation by approving the resolution provided in the agenda packet.
Ms. McGovern asked if there were any questions for staff.
Ms. Carver asked if the code could be changed to not allow credits to sit unused for an extended time.
Mr. Anderson discussed potential solutions to provide more incentives or possibly use money from the
city’s 150 fund to provide a guaranteed backing of the credits. He stated more analysis and discussion
would be required before any changes are made to the program.
Ms. Carver stated perhaps larger projects need to create more affordable housing onsite.
Mr. Anderson responded there used to be an onsite requirement of affordable housing units but over
time, the community moved away from the requirement.
Ms. McGovern believes it is difficult for single family homeowners to offset their less than 1 FTE
requirements. She believes the program is great in theory, but the reality is the larger developers sit on
them. She would like to see a change in the process to incentivize on site or off site mitigation.
Ms. McGovern then opened for commissioner deliberation.
Mr. Rose supports staff’s recommendation since he feels there is a need for the batch approvals of FIL
with the lack of credits available.
Ms. Rockhill is not sure she understands the difference between a credit and a fee. She supports staff’s
recommendation because she doesn’t feel there isn’t a mechanism now.
Mr. Anderson noted historically there has been a calculation for the amount of money required to build
housing for one FTE. The FIL is based on a category established by the Aspen Pitkin County Housing
Authority (APCHA) and is the balance for the cost to build a unit and the rent or sale revenue that comes
in from the unit. A credit can be purchased for mitigation and costs roughly the same as FIL.
Mr. McKnight, Ms. Carver and Ms. McGovern agree with Mr. Rose.
Mr. Rose motioned to approve Resolution #6, Series 2022 and was seconded by Mr. McKnight. Ms.
McGovern requested a roll call: Ms. Carver, yes; Mr. Rose, yes; Ms. Rockhill, yes; Mr. McKnight, yes; and
Ms. McGovern, yes; for a total of five (5) in favor – zero (0) not in favor. The motion passed.
Ms. McGovern thanked Mr. Anderson.
4
Minutes Aspen Planning and Zoning Commission February 15, 2022
Page 3 of 7
Update on Residential Development and Short-Term Rental Moratorium
Ms. McGovern then asked Mr. Anderson to proceed with the next item on the agenda.
Mr. Anderson reviewed the background of the moratorium passed by City Council in December and the
role of P&Z. He noted there has been local and national press covering the topic and the city has
dedicated staff and consultants to work on it. They have started interviews already with staff,
stakeholders in the development and real estate communities, and individuals dealing with short-term
rentals. Public facing outreach activities will be scheduled for the first week in March including focus
groups with the city’s review boards. He encouraged the P&Z members to participate as a commissioner
as well as a member of the public. He also invited them to reach out to him individually if they prefer.
Mr. Anderson stated once staff is prepared to propose policy changes, staff will be asking P&Z to weigh
in on specific language in ordinances.
He then displayed a number of slides used in discussions with City Council including how the
moratorium happened, the problem statements identified out of Ordinance 27 establishing the
moratorium, and the specific policy areas City Council wants staff to respond to towards the identified
problem statements.
He reiterated this is a time for P&Z to ask questions and there is no formal action required of P&Z at this
time.
Mr. Anderson displayed a slide showing issues identified in Ordinance 27, Series 2021 that led to the
moratorium. He understands there may be different opinions regarding the mortarium from the
community. In staff’s view, looking not only in Aspen, but looking at peer communities across the West,
communities are struggling with the same issues and City Council wanted to respond to these issues. He
said the community has been struggling with these issues for a long time and they have reached a
different scale of intensity over the last couple of years.
He then displayed a slide showing examples headlines of news stories on labor shortages, housing,
short-term rentals, migration in the mountains, etc.
The next side displayed included information regarding Aspen’s climate goals and commitments and
what was happening in residential development in response to the goals. He stated residential
development made up 33% of Aspen’s emissions in 2017. Also displayed was part of a Pitkin County
report indicating homes greater than 5,000 SF in size demand more energy per square foot than smaller
homes.
Then he displayed some graphics identifying existing conditions including a table showing the growth
management allotment system is not really being utilized even with the amount of development
occurring, a heat map showing the location of the short term rental permits, and a map showing the
number of issued and open building permits. He stated there is currently about $750 million in permit
valuation and about 70% of it is residential.
Mr. Anderson discussed staff’s view on what success will look like including the identification of
effective, practical, and defensible responses to the issues within the time constraints while engaging
the community when reviewing the issues and considering responses.
He then reviewed the constraints including the need to have responsive ordinances in effect by June 8th,
which is the end of the moratorium, the early impacts of COVID on the outreach efforts, the complexity
of the issues being reviewed, and the differing opinions regarding the issues and potential responses.
5
Minutes Aspen Planning and Zoning Commission February 15, 2022
Page 4 of 7
He next reviewed the project staffing including city staff from Community Development, Climate Action,
Communications, and Finance departments. He also displayed a list of consultants being utilized and
explained their role in the project.
Mr. Anderson next reviewed a conceptual project timeline and noted it is a tight timeframe to complete
something before the end of the moratorium.
Mr. Anderson then discussed the problem statements identified by City Council regarding short-term
rentals (STRs) including discouraging further displacement of working locals; basic health, safety, and
visitor experience standards; mitigation of employee generation and other impacts; limiting impacts on
the community and neighborhood character; and acknowledging STRs as a distinct land use with its own
characteristics. He stated the city receives complaints from neighbors that STRs are occurring in
residential zones, and they are changing the character of the neighborhood.
He asked if there were any questions at this time.
Mr. Rose feels the emergency moratorium seemed to be like shooting from the hip when it came to
short term rentals. He lives in Hunter Creek and the HOA prevents STRs except for 2 two-week periods
per year. He would like to see actions like this incentivized. He believes the long term rentals are
completely unaffordable at Hunter Creek. He wouldn’t want to see some owners damaged with any
proposed changes when the only way they can afford their unit is because they also own a STR.
Ms. Rockhill stated in regards to the city bringing in consultants from the front range and from the
Carolinas, she feels there are a large number of experts on this topic that have worked in this industry
for 20 years or more that have data the city doesn’t. She stated the rental licensing program is very new
and the increases may be because people did not get licenses before the program. She feels there is a
free pool of people who are very vested stakeholders like herself, who would want to have a
conversation in probably already know a lot of the things the city is working on.
Mr. Anderson replied they have a lot of local folks from the industry on a list to be interviewed. There is
also a plan to have a focus group specific to the STR topic to balance local knowledge with people who
crunch data for a living and who can bring perspectives from other areas. One area in particular includes
best practices around ensuring the health and safety visitor experience. He stated it may appear this
action is from the hip, but the city has received complaints from neighbors who are frustrated because
of what is occurring in the STR next to their home they have been living in for the last 20 years.
Ms. Rockhill asked to be included on an interview list. She believes often the people with the deepest
pockets are the ones penalized instead of just telling the people that are used to living in the West end
for 40 years with the lights off that they have to share their neighborhood. She doesn’t feel that
perspective gets voiced very often and usually it is the people that are upset with changes, even when it
is not their property.
Ms. Carver stated she owns a rental townhouse property with three units and has been a rental
landowner for many years. She has a 6 month renter in it, and she has always worked with Tracy Sutton
of Aspen Signature Properties. She feels there are vast resources in the community. She feels the city is
just becoming aware of some of the problems with some units. She is aware of some people who
converted their garage to a rental unit to help put their kids through college and knows of someone who
checked into their Airbnb and discovered it had not been fully cleaned from the previous guest. She
feels the current problem is with brokers who manage STRs who don’t know what they can do for the
upcoming seasons and holidays. She stated most people in this community deal with visitors and that’s
how they make their bread and butter.
6
Minutes Aspen Planning and Zoning Commission February 15, 2022
Page 5 of 7
Mr. Anderson stated City Council has asked staff to look into STR standards and processes regarding
zoning, operational standards, life safety, permitting, fees, and enforcement.
Mr. Anderson then discussed the pace and scale of residential development. City Council members
believes there are inconsistencies between the climate action goals and the residential development. He
stated most of the affordable housing mitigation requirements come from new subdivisions and
multifamily properties and residential development has dominated the sector currently. He stated
Council wants to make sure the mass and scale of residential properties is consistent with the Aspen
Area Community Plan (AACP). He stated the city hearsa lot about the construction impacts on
neighbors. He stated the city is receiving a lot of requests for 800 amp services which is four times the
amount required by a normal house due to the complexities of the systems in the house.
Ms. McGovern stated on the flip side, city staff is asking developers to prioritize electrification which will
increase the amps needed and decrease the dependence on gas to meet the climate goals. She stated
Aspen is a luxury resort and the developers are trying to provide the level of luxury required by tourist
and second homeowners. She doesn’t know how we can be consistent with the goals without having an
impact on infrastructure.
Mr. Anderson responded he can clearly see how those two things are in conflict with each other.
Ms. McGovern does not believe the mass and scale was brought up as a reason for the moratorium. She
feels the mass and scale has been consistent with the land use code and is a different conversation if it is
not consistent with the AACP. She believes mass and scale as well as infrastructure will require a much
more information and much more public outreach because of the longer impacts to the build
environment. She feels what the community wants and what Council wants may be different at this
point.
Mr. Anderson agrees they are difficult topics, and noted they were referenced in Ordinance 27.
Ms. Carver asked if we are talking about STRs or development.
Mr. Anderson stated the four areas included in the moratorium including STRs, pace and scale of
development, further encouragement of affordable housing, and make processes for affordable housing
and development more streamlined.
Ms. Carver stated in regards to pace and scale, she has experienced nine construction projects within a
block and a half of her residence, and she doesn’t believe a neighborhood should be impacted so heavily
at one time. She would like to see some limits as to what can be done at once.
Ms. Carver also asked why they give two construction workers a permit to park all day in a 2 hour zone.
She believes it should be three construction workers to cut back on the cars, etc.
Mr. Anderson then discussed development allotments stating the allotments are for new development,
so they have not been used. It is easy to see all the construction around town along with the parking
concerns, noise concerns and construction fencing that is up for three years. Staff has heard from
Council and members of the community that there is a growth management system, but it isn’t pacing
the development. He believes demolition will be a topic of focus in this area.
Ms. McGovern stated most of the time they don’t want their projects to be as complicated as they are,
but in order to meet all the requirements, it makes the project complicated because the requirements
increase the scope. She gave an example of a project to remodel 50% of the interior required a storm
water management plan, a low water landscape plan even when the original scope wasn’t anything
7
Minutes Aspen Planning and Zoning Commission February 15, 2022
Page 6 of 7
outside of the building. The requirements increase the number of people involved on the project and
increases the length of the project. She would like to see this as part of the conversation and would also
like to understand the priorities of the community.
Mr. Anderson stated they will be looking at demolition because it a big part of the development context
and it is confusing and leads to outcomes we don’t want. He noted there will be some discussion
regarding demolition triggering compliance with GMQS standards.
Ms. McGovern believes the demolition code section is very arduous and drives the design of any existing
project.
Mr. Anderson stated counsel also wants to have a discussion regarding residential development
allowances. He added the discussion will include calculations and measurements dealing with mass and
scale.
Mr. Anderson next discussed the current processes involved with reviewing affordable housing projects.
He noted the recent 1020 E Cooper Ave project which fully complied with the code but took 18 months
to get approved.
Ms. McGovern noted there already been another application on the site for the previous year. She also
stated she and Ms. Carver would like as part of the discussion to have the code require commercial
multi-unit projects to build affordable housing on site and not be able to use credit or for a small
percentage. Ms. Carver agreed with Ms. McGovern.
Mr. Anderson responded the city is not seeing many large scale projects anymore.
Ms. McGovern feels the land use code should be written to look at potential future projects and not just
what is available currently.
Mr. Anderson stated currently in the land use code, growth such as new residential and new commercial
is directly related to growth management. City Council has requested staff to figure out how to decouple
this relationship and he feels the community is questioning the success of this.
Mr. Anderson the discussed areas related to the development review process to be reviewed including
the efficiency and predictability of the review process, loopholes leading to and desirable outcomes,
board reviews, and barriers to approving affordable housing projects.
He then discussed the proposed public engagement plan and encouraged the commissioners to
participate as a community member as well as a commissioner.
Ms. Rockhill asked if there will be an opportunity for public comment on whatever staff drafts for
Council’s review.
Mr. Anderson responded the conversation with Council will be at public hearings.
Ms. Carver believes it would be good to include architects in the conversation. She then asked if the city
requires a certain percentage of demolition materials to be recycled.
Mr. Anderson responded the city will be looking into encouraging participation. He added the county
has regulations in place, and it seems to work better on larger lots where there is room to sort on site.
He added the excavation and demolition company for the Molly Gibson is pursuing some innovative
tactics on demolition, sorting, and grinding materials to be recycled or take to the landfill.
Mr. Anderson thanked everyone for their valuable comments.
8
Minutes Aspen Planning and Zoning Commission February 15, 2022
Page 7 of 7
Ms. McGovern appreciates staff and Council taking on these difficult projects. She feels the compressed
timeline is tough and may not allow for an outcome as good as the community deserves, but she
appreciates areas being prioritized as what should be done now and what can wait. She encouraged the
commissioners to participate.
Update on New Commissioners
Ms. McGovern asked staff for an update on new commissioners.
Ms. Simon responded Council had interviewed candidates last week and she does not know of their
decision.
Ms. Simon added staff could not find a time for a work session so it will be discussed at the March 1st
regular meeting.
Ms. McGovern asked if the work session would be recorded so it could be available to new
commissioners.
Ms. Carver asked when the terms were ending.
Ms. Simon responded the end of March or the March 15th meeting.
Mr. McKnight motioned to adjourn and was seconded by Ms. Rockhill. Rose. All in favor and the meeting
was adjourned at 6:10 pm.
Cindy Klob, Records Manager
9
Page | 1
MEMORANDUM
TO: Aspen Planning & Zoning Commission
FROM: Ben Anderson, Long-Range Planner
Kevin Rayes, Planner II
THRU: Amy Simon, Planning Director
MEMO DATE: February 24, 2022
MEETING DATE: March 1, 2022
RE: Aspen Mini-Storage – Recommendation to City Council regarding
Ordinances that would approve Annexation and Initial Zoning.
Public Hearing in consideration of a recommendation.
Applicant:
City of Aspen
Capital Asset Department
Representative:
Robert Schultz, Robert Schultz Consulting, LLC
Location:
Aspen Mini-Storage Property, 105 AABC (aka
Woodward Lane), Aspen CO 81611
Current Zoning
B-2 (General Business) pursuant to County
Zoning
Summary:
The City of Aspen recently acquired the Aspen-
Mini Storage property adjacent to the Aspen
Business Center. The City requests to annex
the land and rezone the property to Service,
Commercial, Industrial (S/C/I) with a Planned
Development overlay to memorialize existing
conditions on the site.
STAFF RECOMMENDATION:
The requests associated with this application
meet all applicable review criteria and comply
with the provisions set forth by State Statute.
For context, while this application is focused on
the annexation of land and memorializing
existing conditions, the City plans to eventually
develop affordable housing on the subject
property which will require a subsequent land
use review.
Staff recommends approval of the application.
Figure 1: Mini-Storage Location
City Limits
Mini-
Storage
Figure 2: Mini-Storage Existing Improvements
10
Page | 2
REQUEST OF THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION:
The applicant is requesting the following approvals:
• Annexation of the Property into The City of Aspen
Annexation is not a topic that is described in the Land Use Code. Instead, Aspen has an
adopted Annexation Plan and other provisions in the Municipal Code that provide
annexation review criteria. Additionally, Colorado Revised Statutes require other
provisions and processes that have separately been addressed.
• Amendments to the Land Use Code & Official Zone District Map (Land Use Code
Section 26.310)
This city-owned property is currently located within Pitkin County- outside city limits. The
property is zoned B-2 (General Business) which is a zoning designation prescribed by the
County. Pending approval to annex the parcel, land use control will shift to City jurisdiction.
The application requests to rezone the property to Service, Commercial, Industrial (S/C/I)
which is a zone district established by the City that is most compatible with the existing use
as a mini-storage facility.
• Consolidated Conceptual and Final PD- Project Review and Detailed Review (Land
Use Code Section 26.445.050)
Upon annexing the City-owned property, the applicant requests to create a Planned
Development (PD) overlay to memorialize existing conditions and provide a guarantee that
existing improvements and uses are legally established, but cannot be expanded.
City Council is the final review authority for these requests. Planning and Zoning Commission is
asked to provide recommendation to City Council.
SUMMARY AND BACKGROUND:
The mini-storage facility was purchased by the City of Aspen in 2020. The 3-acre property is
located within Pitkin County, and within the urban growth boundary, and just outside City limits.
Pursuant to County zoning, the property is located within the (B-2) General business zone district
and is improved with several buildings that provide storage services to the public.
The adjacent property to the east is also owned by the City and continues to function as a
lumberyard. Eventually, the City plans to assemble these properties as part of the Lumberyard
affordable housing project that is currently being planned and designed.
The scope of this application is limited to: 1) annexing the mini-storage facility into City limits, and
2) establishing an initial zoning of the property to Service, Commercial, Industrial (S/C/I) with a
Planned Development overlay. The purpose is to “freeze” the site in its current condition and
memorialize its use as a mini-storage facility – that includes a dwelling unit for the manager of the
storage facility.
This application does not request any new development. Development of an affordable housing
project is anticipated for the future; however, it will require a subsequent land use application and
remain subject to review and approval from the Planning & Zoning Commission and City Council.
Council is set to review the annexation and rezoning Ordinances on March 22 and April 12. April
12 is scheduled for Second Reading and will be a public hearing.
11
Page | 3
DISCUSSION & STAFF FINDINGS
Annexation
Many of the review standards related to annexations are dictated by Colorado Revised Statutes.
The standards prescribed by the State are generally written to anticipate annexations that
encumber multiple properties and land uses, which generally requires significant coordination
among various stakeholders, members of the public, and businesses. The scope of this
application is quite narrow as it is concerned with a single parcel that is owned by the City of
Aspen. The property currently provides storage services to the public which will not change
following the annexation. While some of the criteria related to annexations are applicable, the
majority are not. For example, one criterion requires that no less than fifty percent of adult
residents of the area proposed to be annexed to make use of part or all of recreational, civic,
social, religious, industrial, or commercial uses within the annexing municipality. Because of the
use as a mini-storage facility, this criterion is not applicable.
One criterion that is applicable to this request requires at least one-sixth of the perimeter of the
area proposed for annexation to be contiguous with the annexing municipality. The total perimeter
of the property subject to the annexation is 1,665.54 linear feet. The contiguous portion of the
perimeter is 435.05 linear feet. One sixth of the perimeter is 277.59 linear feet, which shows the
necessary contiguity is met.
Other annexation criteria are prescribed by City regulations. The first requires alignment with the
goals set forth within the Aspen Area Community Plan (AACP). Pursuant to the AACP, properties
located within the Urban Growth Boundary (UGB) are appropriate for annexation. As previously
mentioned, the subject property is located within the UGB. Local code also requires a fiscal impact
analysis to be conducted for any changes in use that might occur because of the annexation. In
this instance, the storage facility that currently exists within the County will remain as a storage
facility upon annexation into the City. No new development is proposed as part of the application
and so a fiscal analysis is not required. If the property is redeveloped in the future, a fiscal analysis
along with a subsequent land use application would be conducted as part of the eventual
Lumberyard affordable housing project. Importantly, the property, following annexation, will
remain as part of all special districts (for property taxation purposes) to which it is currently subject.
Rezoning
Because it is located within the County, the property is currently zoned B-2 (General Business)
which allows for the existing use of a storage facility. Pending approval for annexation, the
property will fall under the jurisdiction of the City and will need to be rezoned to a zone district
established under Title 26 of the City land use code. Upon analyzing the intent and purpose of
the zone districts set forth within the code, staff believes that rezoning the property to
Service/Commercial/Industrial (S/C/I) will allow the existing use to remain compliant with
underlying zoning. Rezoning a property requires compatibility with surrounding zone districts and
land uses. The purpose of S/C/I is consistent with the intent of the B-2 zoning. Like B-2, S/C/I is
intended to enhance the City’s commercial diversity by allowing light industrial, manufacturing,
production, repair, and other service-related uses.
The property to the north is located within unincorporated county and includes commercial, light
industrial and affordable housing uses. To the east are storage and affordable housing uses.
Pitkin County Airport is located to the west. The mix of surrounding uses are consistent with the
mini storage facility. Additionally, rezoning the property will not change demands on public
facilities. Existing capacity for services such as transportation, sewage, water supply, parks,
drainage, or schools will not be impacted. The purpose of rezoning is to legalize the established
12
Page | 4
use of the storage facility within City limits. No changes to the property are proposed. Any future
development will require a subsequent application and review.
Final Planned Development (Combined Project and Detailed Review)
In addition to rezoning the property to S/C/I, the application seeks to establish a Planned
Development overlay on the annexed land. Doing so effectively “freezes” the current condition
in place as this application does not include any proposed new development. When the City is
ready to move forward with a development plan, a land use application will be submitted,
resulting in a comprehensive land use review.
Pursuant to the Land Use Code, approval of Project Review and Detailed Review together
constitute a Final Planned Development Approval. Both reviews are needed for a Planned
Development to become official.
Project Review is intended to establish the allowed dimensions of a property and ensure site
planning is compatible with the context of the area.
Detailed review is intended to perfect and finalize the detailed aspects of the project within the
parameters established during Project Review.
It should be noted that the establishment of an S/C/I - PD zoning designation on this property is
identical to the zoning established on the adjacent Lumberyard property and is proposed for
identical purposes.
RECOMMENDATION:
Staff recommends that the Planning and Zoning Commission make a recommendation of
approval for the request to annex the subject property, to rezone the land to
Service/Commercial/Industrial (S/C/I) and establish a Planned Development Overlay, and to
accept the existing conditions as establishing the terms of the Planned Development.
PROPOSED MOTION:
“I move to approve Resolution #XX, Series of 2022 to recommend approval for the annexation of
the subject property within City limits, to zone the property to the Service/Commercial/Industrial
(S/C/I) Zone District with a Planned Development Overlay, and to memorialize the existing
dimensions and use of the property as the Planned Development.
ATTACHMENTS:
Resolution #___, Series of 2022
Exhibit A.1 | Annexation Criteria - Staff Findings
Exhibit A.2 | Rezoning Criteria - Staff Findings
Exhibit A.3 | Planned Development Criteria – Staff Findings
Exhibit B | Application
Exhibit C | Annexation Map
Exhibit D | Current Site Improvements – PD Site Plan
Exhibit E | Proposed Ordinances (Council – Annexation and Zoning
Exhibit F | Public Notice Affidavits
13
P&Z Resolution #XX, Series of 2022
Page 1 of 3
RESOLUTION # XX
(SERIES OF 2022)
A RESOLUTION OF THE ASPEN PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION
RECOMMENDING APPROVAL FOR ANNEXATION, AN AMENDMENT TO THE
ZONE DISTRICT MAP AND A PLANNED DEVELOPMENT- PROJECT REVIEW
AND DETAILED REVIEW FOR THE PROPERTY COMMONLY KNOWN AS 105
AABC, LEGALLY DESCRIBED AS LOT 3 OF THE COMMUNICATIONS CENTER
SUBDIVISION, ACCORDING TO THE PLAT THEREOF RECORDED OCTOBER 3,
1988 IN PLAT BOOK 21 AT PAGE 34, COUNTY OF PITKIN, STATE OF COLORADO.
Parcel No. 2735-031-02-003
WHEREAS,the Community Development department received an application from the City
of Aspen Capital Asset Department, represented by Robert Schultz Consulting, LLC, requesting
approval of Annexation, an Amendment to the Zone District Map and a Planned Development for
the property at 105 AABC, legally described as Lot 3 of the Communications Center Subdivision,
Pitkin County, Colorado; and,
WHEREAS, the property is owned by the City of Aspen, is zoned B-2 (General Business),
and is located in unincorporated Pitkin County; and,
WHEREAS, the Applicant requests that the Planning and Zoning Commission review the
proposed annexation against review criteria within the City of Aspen’s adopted Annexation Plan,
and provide recommendation to City Council in support of the annexation of this property; and,
WHEREAS, the Applicant requests the Planning and Zoning Commission find that the
Amendment to the Zone District Map meets applicable requirements and provide a
recommendation to City Council in support of an underlying Zone District of Service Commercial
Industrial, SCI with a Planned Development overlay; and,
WHEREAS, the Applicant requests the Planning and Zoning Commission find that the
Planned Development meets applicable requirements a provide a recommendation to City Council
in support of Planned Development Project Review and Detailed Review and,
WHEREAS,upon initial review of the application and the applicable code standards, the
Community Development Department found that the application meets or exceeds the applicable
standards of review; and,
WHEREAS, the City of Aspen Planning and Zoning Commission reviewed and considered
the land use proposal under the applicable provisions of the Municipal Code as identified herein,
reviewed and considered the recommendation of the Community Development Director and took
and considered public comment at a duly noticed public hearing on March 1
st, 2022; and,
14
P&Z Resolution #XX, Series of 2022
Page 2 of 3
WHEREAS, the City of Aspen Planning and Zoning Commission finds that the application
meets the applicable review criteria and that approval of the request is consistent with the goals
and objectives of the Land Use Code; and,
WHEREAS, the City of Aspen Planning and Zoning Commission finds that this Resolution
furthers and is necessary for the promotion of public health, safety, and welfare, and,
WHEREAS, the City of Aspen Planning and Zoning Commission approves Resolution #XX,
Series of 2022, by a X to X (X-X) vote, recommending approval for Annexation, an Amendment
to the Land Use Code and Zoning Map and Planned Development Review for Project Review and
Detailed Review as identified herein.
NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED, THE ASPEN PLANNING & ZONING
COMMISSION RECOMMENDS THE FOLLOWING:
Section 1: Recommendation of Approval
The City of Aspen Planning and Zoning Commission provides the following recommendation to
Aspen City Council:
a) The proposed annexation meets applicable review criteria in The City of Aspen’s
adopted Annexation Plan and should be approved.
b) The proposed Zoning of SCI (Service, Commercial, Industrial) with a Planned
Development overlay is appropriate and meets applicable review criteria in the Land Use
Code and should be approved.
c) The proposed Planned Development overlay is an appropriate tool to memorialize the
existing dimensions and uses on the property and meets applicable review criteria and
should be approved.
Section 2: Material Representations
All material representations and commitments made by the Applicant pursuant to the development
proposal approvals as herein awarded, whether in public hearing or documentation presented
before the Planning and Zoning Commission, are hereby incorporated in such site development
approvals and the same shall be complied with as if fully set forth herein, unless amended by an
authorized entity.
Section 3: Existing Litigation
This resolution shall not affect any existing litigation and shall not operate as an abatement of any
action or proceeding now pending under or by virtue of the ordinances repealed or amended as herein
provided, and the same shall be conducted and concluded under such prior ordinances.
Section 4: Severability
If any section, subsection, sentence, clause, phrase, or portion of this resolution is for any reason held
invalid or unconstitutional in a court of competent jurisdiction, such portion shall be deemed a
15
P&Z Resolution #XX, Series of 2022
Page 3 of 3
separate, distinct and independent provision and shall not affect the validity of the remaining portions
thereof.
APPROVED by the Commission at its meeting on March 1, 2022.
APPROVED AS TO FORM: PLANNING AND ZONING
COMMISSION:
_________________________________________________________
Katharine Johnson, Assistant City Attorney Teraissa McGovern, Chair
ATTEST:
____________________________
Cindy Klob, Records Manager
16
Exhibit A.1
Annexation Criteria
Page | 1
City of Aspen Annexation Criteria:
Annexation is a quasi-legislative authority of the City and as such the City may consider
the interests of its citizens as guiding annexation policy, in addition to the procedural
statutory requirements. This section identifies specific public policy concerns likely to
arise during consideration of an annexation request. These criteria should be used to
determine when annexation is appropriate, which land should be annexed, and how it
should be zoned. Additional considerations, beyond those identified herein, may also
arise and guide public policy.
AACP Compliance
Annexation requests should be reviewed for alignment with the Aspen Area Community
Plan (AACP). Annexation of certain lands could facilitate accomplishment of the plan’s
goals, philosophy, policies, or specific action items.
Staff response: The application requests to annex the parcel and rezone the property
pursuant to the City of Aspen code provisions to allow the existing use as a mini-storage
facility to continue. This request will not change the relationship with the AACP. The
property is intended to be developed at some point in the future and is anticipated to be
used as affordable housing. Any proposal to redevelop the property will be analyzed for
compliance and continuity with the goals and objectives of the AACP. Staff finds this
criterion to be met.
Urban Growth Boundary (UGB)
The City of Aspen approved Aspen’s Urban Growth Boundary via adoption of the 2012
AACP. The UGB identifies the land surrounding Aspen as either appropriate for urban
development (within the UGB) or inappropriate for urban development (outside the UGB).
Land within the UGB is expected to become part of the City’s urbanized area and should
be considered appropriate for annexation.
Land outside the UGB should only be annexed as a method of preserving the non-urban
character of lands surrounding Aspen. The UGB does not necessarily need to be
amended unless the land is intended for an urban level of development. Annexation of
land outside the UGB, in fact, may serve a significant public purpose.
Staff response: Pursuant to the 2019 Aspen Annexation Plan, land that is located within
the Urban Growth Boundary (UGB) is anticipated to be annexed into the City at some
point in the future. This property is located within the UGB and within the Aspen Business
Center. Staff finds this criterion to be met.
Significant Annexations
Changing the regulatory structure and jurisdiction of significant community facilities, large
developments, and large tracts of vacant land present considerable potential for
community change. These annexation proposals should involve discussion between the
Aspen City Council and the Pitkin County Board of County Commissioners. A joint work
17
Exhibit A.1
Annexation Criteria
Page | 2
session at which various land use issues are discussed can only benefit the City in it’s
analysis of a significant annexation. For example: properties entitled by the County and
annexed into the City can require complex administration of development rights,
especially when amendments are requested. Discussing the primary elements of the
land use review can simplify administration and provide benefit to the annexing
landowner.
Likewise, certain annexation proposals may present concerns to other governmental and
quasi-governmental agencies with jurisdiction or other interest in the property. As
necessary, formal referral comments or work session-format meetings can be held to
identify these concerns.
Staff response: The scope of the proposed annexation does not reach the threshold of
a Significant Annexation. The subject property is owned by the City of Aspen and the
current land use of a storage facility will remain pending annexation and rezoning. Staff
finds this criterion to be not applicable.
Fiscal Impact Analysis
The City should fully understand the financial implication of assuming additional lands
upon each of its functions. The City Finance Department has modeled fiscal impacts of
recent significant annexations and this information has been critical in determining the
appropriateness of annexation. Certain capital improvements may be necessary as well
as additional operation and service costs. These need to be balanced with additional
special fund revenues that are gained.
Pitkin County voters adopted a 2 percent Countywide sales tax, including a provision
distributing 47 percent of the tax proceeds to Pitkin County and 53 percent to the City of
Aspen. At some point, the distribution of countywide sales tax may need to be
reconsidered as more service responsibilities shift to the City.
Staff response: The application requests annexing a single property and continuing the
existing use as a storage facility. Because the property is currently owned by the City, it
does not generate property tax revenue. Annexing the property into the City will not
change that. However, by annexing the property, the City will gain jurisdiction over the
zoning and allowed uses of the site, thus allowing orderly planning of future use of the
site in conjunction with City parcels. The city will receive ongoing lease revenues from the
existing storage use and parking leases.
Pending receipt of a redevelopment proposal, the costs of new infrastructure and services
compared to existing uses will be quantified and analyzed by the City as part of a
subsequent land use review. Staff finds this criterion to be met.
18
Exhibit A.1
Annexation Criteria
Page | 3
Development Rights/Zoning
Development rights associated with a property in Pitkin County verses those if the
property is annexed into the City of Aspen should be considered. Annexations are
typically associated with a proposal to further develop the property. Traditionally, the City
weighs an increase in development rights in relation to accomplishment towards
community goals available through annexation.
A complete understanding of a property’s development potential, prior to annexation,
should include a zoning build-out analysis considering regulatory limitations, such as
growth management and impact fees, and regulatory incentives, such as the use of
Transferable Development Rights. The public policy of such regulations and the impact
of changing the regulatory structure upon the City should be considered.
Zoning of newly annexed land should approximate development rights prior to
annexation, unless a site-specific development plan is approved concurrent with
annexation. The creation of non-conformities should be avoided, although custom
legislation to address special interests can further complicate the City’s regulatory
environment.
The City should encourage the legalization of “bandit units” through the City’s Accessory
Dwelling Unit provisions to ensure compliance with the health and safety standards of
Adopted building codes. These units should be expected in older subdivisions
surrounding Aspen.
Staff Response: The property is proposed for rezoning in a process concurrent with the
Annexation. Staff finds this criterion to be met.
Pitkin County Transferable Development Rights
Certain lands in the County within the City’s annexation area are eligible for increased
development rights through the extinguishment of transferable development rights
(TDRs). Certain site specific approvals granted in Pitkin County may involve or require
the use of TDRs. And, certain development may have already occurred by use of these
TDRs necessitating acknowledgment of the realized increased development right.
Until the City adopts a program for accepting Pitkin County Transferable development
Rights, each individual annexation request should include an analysis of TDR-contingent
land use scenarios and, if necessary, an agreement should be reached describing the
future use of Pitkin County TDRs within the newly annexed area.
Staff Response: Staff finds this criterion to be not applicable
Usefulness and Appropriateness of Each Jurisdiction’s Regulations
As Aspen City limits expand beyond the original townsite, the effects of environmental
constraints and hazards on development increase. Pitkin County’s 1041 regulations
19
Exhibit A.1
Annexation Criteria
Page | 4
address development on steep slopes, in wildfire hazard areas, in rockfall and avalanche
hazard areas, and within wildlife corridors. The City’s Environmentally Sensitive Area
review standards address flood hazard areas and development above the 8,040-foot
elevation.
The County’s regulations primarily attempt to minimize land use intensity and minimize
the infrastructure and operational effects of development. The City’s land use code
encourages the intense use of land and addresses urban development issues, such as
architectural character. In transition areas, the City’s Planned Development regulations
should be used to establish an appropriate balance.
Design standards for public improvements also reflect the rural and urban aspect of each
jurisdiction. The appropriateness of each jurisdiction’s development regulations and
design standards should be considered in each annexation. The acceptance of
substandard public improvements and potential public costs of upgrading those facilities
should also be considered. The City may require certain facilities be upgraded prior to
annexation. Alternatively, the City may require a cash payment to accommodate expected
City capital improvement and operational expenses.
Staff Response: Zoning will change as the property moves into the City of Aspen, but to
staff’s knowledge the property would not be subject to significantly different regulations
following annexation. The property does lie within the West of Maroon Plan – a special
planning area that includes the AABC. The City is not party to this plan, although it is
identified and discussed in the Aspen Area Community Plan. Staff finds this criterion
to be met.
Infrastructure and Ability to Serve
Annexation reviews typically focus a great deal of fiscal analysis on the potential
extension of urban services to annexed territories. Cost, capacity, and engineering issues
related extension of the City’s municipal water system to developing land on the urban
fringe is a significant annexation issue.
Currently, several small water districts serve residences located outside the City’s
boundaries but within the service area of the water system. These small districts may
present a long-term problem for the City as their capital facilities may not be providing
acceptable standards of service. Upgrading is expensive and may become the
responsibility of the City following annexation.
Staff Response: The property will continue to be served by the same utilities. Staff
finds this criterion to be not applicable
Simplicity of City Boundary
The City/County boundary has created confusion for citizens and staff responsible for
enforcing public policy. A complex boundary can complicate emergency service provision
and, in extreme cases, defeat efforts of law enforcement officers. Annexations simplifying
20
Exhibit A.1
Annexation Criteria
Page | 5
the boundary should be encouraged while those further complicating the division should
be avoided.
Staff Response: The property is immediately adjacent to the current City boundary. The
current conditions related to circulation, addressing, emergency services remain the
same. Staff finds this criterion to be met.
21
Exhibit A.2
Amendments to the Land Use Code & Official Zone District Map
Page | 1
Land Use Code Section 26.310.090, Rezoning- Standards for Review
In reviewing an amendment to the Official Zone District Map, the City Council and the
Planning and Zoning Commission shall consider:
a. Whether the proposed amendment is compatible with surrounding zone districts
and land uses, considering existing land use and neighborhood characteristics.
Staff response: The subject property is located within the B-2 (General
Business) zone district as established by the Pitkin County land use code. The
purpose of this zone district is to provide for the establishment of low-intensity,
non-polluting industrial uses that do not require or generate high customer traffic
volumes. The existing storage facility complies with underlying zoning.
Pending annexation, the property will need to be rezoned pursuant to the City of
Aspen land use code. The applicant believes the allowed uses of the
Service/Commercial/Industrial (S/C/I) zone district are most compatible with
those of the B-2 zone district. Like B-2, the purpose of S/C/I is to enhance the
City’s commercial diversity by allowing light industrial, manufacturing, production,
repair, and other service-related uses.
The property to the north is located within unincorporated county and includes
commercial, light industrial and affordable housing uses. To the east are storage
and affordable housing uses. Pitkin County Airport is located to the west. The mix
of surrounding uses are consistent with the mini storage facility.
Because the property is currently improved with storage facility structures and a
manager’s unit, a Planned Development overlay zone is proposed to recognize
the existing conditions on the site as legally established. Staff finds this
criterion to be met.
b. Whether and the extent to which the proposed amendment would result in
demands on public facilities and whether and the extent to which the proposed
amendment would exceed the capacity of such public facilities including, but not
limited to, transportation facilities, sewage facilities, water supply, parks,
drainage, schools and emergency medical facilities.
Staff response: Rezoning the subject property to SCI with a PD overlay will not
change demands on public facilities as the existing use as a mini storage facility
will not change. No expansion of the operation is anticipated. While affordable
housing is planned, a subsequent application and land use review will be required
at that time. Staff finds this criterion to be met.
c. Whether and the extent to which the proposed amendment would result in
significantly adverse impacts on the natural environment.
22
Exhibit A.2
Amendments to the Land Use Code & Official Zone District Map
Page | 2
Staff response: No adverse impacts to the natural environment are anticipated
as part of rezoning the property. Rezoning to SCI/PD is intended to allow the
existing use as a mini-storage facility to continue. Impacts to the natural
environment will be assessed if and when an application is submitted to develop
affordable housing. Staff finds this criterion to be met.
d. Whether the proposed amendment is consistent and compatible with the
community character in the city and in harmony with the public interest and the
intent of this Title.
Staff response: Rezoning the subject property to SCI/PD is consistent and
compatible with the neighborhood and community character. The property is
surrounded by light industrial, residential, and other commercial uses. Staff finds
this criterion to be met.
23
Exhibit A.2
Planned Development Review Criteria | Staff Findings
Page | 1
Land Use Code Section 26.445.050, Planned Development Project Review
Standards
The Project Review shall focus on the general concept for the development and shall
outline any dimensional requirements that vary from those allowed in the underlying zone
district. The burden shall rest upon an applicant to show the reasonableness of the
development application and its conformity to the standards and procedures of this
Chapter and this Title. The underlying zone district designation shall be used as a guide,
but not an absolute limitation, to the dimensions which may be considered during the
development review process. Any dimensional variations allowed shall be specified in the
ordinance granting Project Approval. In the review of a development application for a
Project Review, the Planning and Zoning Commission or the Historic Preservation
Commission, as applicable, and City Council shall consider the following:
A. Compliance with Adopted Regulatory Plans.The proposed development complies
with applicable adopted regulatory plans.
Staff Response: While the subject property is currently located within Pitkin
County and outside City limits, it is located within the Urban Growth Boundary
(UGB). Pursuant to the City of Aspen Annexation Plan, land located within the UGB
is generally appropriate for urban development and is expected to eventually
become part of the City’s urbanized area. Pending annexation, staff anticipates
rezoning the property to the Service/Commercial/Industrial (S/C/I) zone district to
maintain the existing use of a mini-storage facility. Adding a Planned Development
(PD) overlay will help to further memorialize the existing use and provide a
guarantee that it complies with all zoning requirements of the City.Staff finds this
criterion to be met.
B. Development Suitability.The proposed Planned Development prohibits
development on land unsuitable for development because of natural or man-made
hazards affecting the property, including flooding, mudflow, debris flow, fault ruptures,
landslides, rock or soil creep, rock falls, rockslides, mining activity including mine
waste deposit, avalanche or snow slide areas, slopes in excess of 30%, and any other
natural or man-made hazard or condition that could harm the health, safety, or welfare
of the community. Affected areas may be accepted as suitable for development if
adequate mitigation techniques acceptable to the City Engineer are proposed in
compliance with Title 29 – Engineering Design Standards. Conceptual plans for
mitigation techniques may be accepted for this standard. The City Engineer may
require specific designs, mitigation techniques, and implementation timelines be
defined as part of the Detailed Review and documented within a Development
Agreement.
Staff Response:No development is proposed as part of this application. The
purpose of this request is to memorialize the existing use as a mini-storage facility.
Any request to redevelop the property in the future will require analysis of potential
24
Exhibit A.2
Planned Development Review Criteria | Staff Findings
Page | 2
impacts to man-made or natural hazards.Staff finds this criterion to be not
applicable.
C. Site Planning.The site plan is compatible with the context and visual character of the
area. In meeting this standard, the following criteria shall be used:
1. The site plan responds to the site’s natural characteristics and physical
constraints such as steep slopes, vegetation, waterways, and any natural or
man-made hazards and allows development to blend in with or enhance said
features.
Staff Response: No development is proposed as part of this application.
Any development proposed in the future, including affordable housing will
require a site plan and analysis of how the project responds to natural
characteristics and physical constraints.Staff finds this criterion to be
not applicable.
2. The project preserves important geologic features, mature vegetation, and
structures or features of the site that have historic, cultural, visual, or ecological
importance or contribute to the identity of the town.
Staff Response:No development is proposed as part of this application.
Staff finds this criterion to be not applicable.
3. Buildings are oriented to public streets and are sited to reflect the neighborhood
context. Buildings and access ways are arranged to allow effective emergency,
maintenance, and service vehicle access.
Staff Response: No development is proposed as part of this application.
The property is currently improved with several buildings that provide
storage services to the public. No changes are anticipated to the existing
improvements on the property. Any development that is proposed in the
future will be subject to subsequent review procedures, including those
associated with an amendment to a planned development.Staff finds this
criterion to be not applicable.
D. Dimensions. All dimensions, including density, mass, and height shall be established
during the Project Review. A development application may request variations to any
dimensional requirement of this Title. In meeting this standard, consideration shall be
given to the following criteria:
1. There exists a significant community goal to be achieved through such
variations.
2. The proposed dimensions represent a character suitable for and indicative of
the primary uses of the project.
3. The project is compatible with or enhances the cohesiveness or distinctive
identity of the neighborhood and surrounding development patterns, including
the scale and massing of nearby historical or cultural resources.
25
Exhibit A.2
Planned Development Review Criteria | Staff Findings
Page | 3
4. The number of off-street parking spaces shall be established based on the
probable number of cars to be operated by those using the proposed
development and the nature of the proposed uses. The availability of public
transit and other transportation facilities, including those pedestrian access
and/or the commitment to utilize automobile disincentive techniques in the
proposed development, and the potential for joint use of common parking may
be considered when establishing a parking requirement.
5. The Project Review approval, at City Council’s discretion, may include specific
allowances for dimensional flexibility between Project Review and Detailed
Review. Changes shall be subject to the amendment procedures of Section
26.445.110 – Amendments.
Staff Response: The subject property is already improved with a storage
facility. No changes to the existing use or improvements are requested. The
purpose of this application is to memorialize existing conditions. Any
dimensional variances, changes to height, bulk or mass will be subject to a
subsequent review. Staff finds this criterion to be not applicable.
E. Design Standards. The design of the proposed development is compatible with the
context and visual character of the area. In meeting this standard, the following criteria
shall be used:
1. The design complies with applicable design standards, including those outlined
in Chapter 26.410, Residential Design Standards, Chapter 26.412, Commercial
Design Standards, and Chapter 26.415, Historic Preservation.
2. The proposed materials are compatible with those called for in any applicable
design standards, as well as those typically seen in the immediate vicinity.
Exterior materials are finalized during Detailed Review, but review boards may
set forth certain expectations or conditions related to architectural character
and exterior materials during Project Review.
Staff Response:No development is proposed as part of this application.
No changes to design, materials or other aesthetic characteristics are
proposed.Staff finds this criterion to be not applicable.
F. Pedestrian, bicycle & transit facilities.The development improves pedestrian,
bicycle, and transit facilities. These facilities and improvements shall be prioritized
over vehicular facilities and improvements. Any vehicular access points, or curb cuts,
minimize impacts on existing or proposed pedestrian, bicycle, and transit facilities.
The City may require specific designs, mitigation techniques, and implementation
timelines be defined as part of the Detailed Review and documented within a
Development Agreement.
Staff Response: No changes to the site plan or layout of the property are
proposed as part of the request to annex and rezone the site. Staff finds this
criterion to be not applicable.
26
Exhibit A.2
Planned Development Review Criteria | Staff Findings
Page | 4
G. Engineering Design Standards.There has been accurate identification of
engineering design and mitigation techniques necessary for development of the
project to comply with the applicable requirements of Municipal Code Title 29 –
Engineering Design Standards and the City of Aspen Urban Runoff Management Plan
(URMP). The City Engineer may require specific designs, mitigation techniques, and
implementation timelines be defined as part of the Detailed Review and documented
within a Development Agreement.
Staff Response: No changes to the property are proposed Any future changes to
the property may trigger Engineering Design Standards. A subsequent land use
application will be required at that time, at which point, the Engineering Department
will have an opportunity to ensure that all standards of Title 29 are met. Staff
finds this criterion to be not applicable.
H. Public Infrastructure and Facilities.The proposed Planned Development shall
upgrade public infrastructure and facilities necessary to serve the project.
Improvements shall be at the sole costs of the developer. The City Engineer may
require specific designs, mitigation techniques, and implementation timelines be
defined as part of the Detailed Review and documented within a Development
Agreement.
Staff Response:The property is currently served by City municipal water and
Aspen Sanitation District wastewater services. Pending annexation and rezoning,
the services provided by these entities will not change. If future development
occurs, the level of utility service provided to the property will be reevaluated.
The cost of those services will be analyzed in conjunction with the master plan
for the area. Staff finds this criterion to be not applicable.
I. Access and Circulation.The proposed development shall have perpetual
unobstructed legal vehicular access to a public way. A proposed Planned
Development shall not eliminate or obstruct legal access from a public way to an
adjacent property. All streets in a Planned Development retained under private
ownership shall be dedicated to public use to ensure adequate public and
emergency access. Security/privacy gates across access points and driveways are
prohibited.
Staff Response: No development is proposed as part of this application. Access
and circulation will not change subsequent to annexation and rezoning. Staff
finds this criterion to be not applicable.
Land Use Code Section 26.445.070, Planned Development Detailed Review
Standards
Detailed Review shall focus on the comprehensive evaluation of the specific aspects of
the development, including utility placement, and architectural materials. In the review
of a development application for Detailed Review, the Planning and Zoning
27
Exhibit A.2
Planned Development Review Criteria | Staff Findings
Page | 5
Commission, or the Historic Preservation Commission as applicable, shall consider the
following:
a)Compliance with Project Review Approval.The proposed development, including
all dimensions and uses, is consistent with the Project Review approval and
adequately addresses conditions on the approval and direction received during
the Project Review.
b)Growth Management.The proposed development has received all required
GMQS allotments, or is concurrently seeking allotments.
c)Site Planning and Landscape Architecture.The site plan is compatible with the
context and visual character of the area. In meeting this standard, the following
criteria shall be used:
1. The landscape plan exhibits a well-designed treatment of exterior spaces,
preserves existing significant vegetation, and provides an ample quantity
and variety of ornamental plant species suitable for the Aspen area
climate. Vegetation removal, protection, and restoration plans shall be
acceptable to the Director of Parks and Open Space.
2. Buildings and site grading provide simple, at-grade entrances and
minimize extensive grade changes along building exteriors. The project
meets or exceeds the requirements of the Americans with Disabilities Act
and applicable requirements for emergency, maintenance, and service
vehicle access. Adequate snow storage is accommodated.
3. Energy efficiency or production features are integrated into the landscape
in a manner that enhances the site.
4. All site lighting is proposed so as to prevent direct glare or hazardous
interference of any kind to adjoining streets or lands. All exterior lighting
shall comply with the City's outdoor lighting standards.
5. Site drainage is accommodated for the proposed development in
compliance with Title 29—Engineering Design Standards and shall not
negatively impact surrounding properties.
d)Design Standards and Architecture.The proposed architectural details
emphasize quality construction and design characteristics. In meeting this
standard, the following criteria shall be used:
1. The project architecture provides for visual interest and incorporates
present-day details and use of materials respectful of the community's
past without attempting to mimic history.
2. Exterior materials are of a high quality, durability, and comply with
applicable design standards, including those outlined in Chapter
26.410,Residential Design Standards, Chapter 26.412,Commercial
Design Standards, and Chapter 26.415,Historic Preservation.
3. Building entrances are sited or designed to minimize icing and snow
shedding effects.
4. Energy efficiency or production features are integrated into structures in a
manner that enhances the architecture.
5. All structure lighting is proposed so as to prevent direct glare or hazardous
interference of any kind to adjoining streets or lands. All exterior lighting
shall comply with the City's outdoor lighting standards.
28
Exhibit A.2
Planned Development Review Criteria | Staff Findings
Page | 6
e)Common Parks, Open Space, Recreation Areas, or Facilities.If the proposed
development includes common parks, open space, recreation areas, or common
facilities, a proportionate, undivided interest is deeded in perpetuity to each lot or
dwelling unit owner within the Planned Development. An adequate assurance
through a Development Agreement for the permanent care and maintenance of
open spaces, recreation areas, and shared facilities together with a prohibition
against future development is required.
f)Pedestrian, bicycle & transit facilities.The development improves pedestrian,
bicycle, and transit facilities. These facilities and improvements shall be
prioritized over vehicular facilities and improvements. Any new vehicular access
points minimize impacts on existing pedestrian, bicycle and transit facilities.
Any specific designs, mitigation techniques, and implementation timelines as
required during Project Review comply with the applicable requirements of the
Project Review and as otherwise required in the Land Use Code. These plans
shall provide sufficient detail to determine if the design or mitigation concept
complies with the intent of the requirements and to determine any required cost
estimating for surety requirements, but do not need to be detailed construction
documents.
g)Engineering Design Standards.There has been accurate identification of
engineering design and mitigation techniques necessary for development of the
proposed subdivision to comply with the applicable requirements of Municipal
Code Title 29—Engineering Design Standards and the City of Aspen Urban
Runoff Management Plan (URMP).
Any specific designs, mitigation techniques, and implementation timelines as
required during Project Review comply with the applicable requirements of
Municipal Code Title 29—Engineering Design Standards and the City of Aspen
Urban Runoff Management Plan (URMP). These plans shall provide sufficient
detail to determine if the design or mitigation concept complies with the intent of
the requirements, but do not need to be detailed construction documents.
h)Public Infrastructure and Facilities.The proposed Planned Development shall
upgrade public infrastructure and facilities necessary to serve the project.
Improvements shall be at the sole costs of the developer.
Any specific designs, mitigation techniques, and implementation timelines as
required during Project Review comply with the applicable requirements of
Municipal Code Title 29—Engineering Design Standards and the City of Aspen
Urban Runoff Management Plan (URMP). These plans shall provide sufficient
detail to determine if the design or mitigation concept complies with the intent of
the requirements, but do not need to be detailed construction documents.
i)Phasing of development plan.If phasing of the development plan is proposed,
each phase shall be designed to function as a complete development and shall
not be reliant on subsequent phases. Phasing shall insulate, to the extent
practical, occupants of initial phases from the construction of later phases. All
necessary or proportionate improvements to public facilities, payment of impact
fees and fees-in-lieu, construction of any facilities to be used jointly by residents
of the Planned Development, construction of any required affordable housing,
29
Exhibit A.2
Planned Development Review Criteria | Staff Findings
Page | 7
and any mitigation measures shall be completed concurrent or prior to the
respective impacts associated with the phase.
Staff response:No development is proposed as part of this application. The
purpose of this request is to establish a Planned Development overlay on the
annexed land. Doing so effectively “freezes” the current condition. When the
City is ready to move forward with a development plan, a land use application
will be submitted, resulting in a comprehensive land use review.
Although most of the criteria associated with Detailed Review are not currently
applicable because no development is proposed, it’s important to note that any
new development that is proposed at this property in the future shall be subject
to the appropriate Planned Development review procedures .
30
Exhibit B | Application
31
Exhibit B | Application
32
Exhibit B | Application
33
Exhibit B | Application
34
Exhibit B | Application
35
ALTA Commitment For Title Insurance
AUTHORIZED AGENT:
PITKIN COUNTY TITLE, INC.
601 E. HOPKINS AVE. 3
RD
FLOOR
ASPEN, COLORADO 81611
970-925-1766-PHONE
970-925-6527-FAX
877-217-3158-TOLL FREE
E-MAIL ADDRESS:
TITLE MATTERS: CLOSING MATTERS:
Nola Warnecke (nola@sopris.net) TJ Davis - (tjd@sopris.net)
Joy Higens - (joy@sopris.net)
Issued By
Home Office:
875 Concourse Parkway South, Suite 200
Maitland, FL 32751
Telephone (407) 629-5842
Exhibit B | Application
36
ALTA Commitment Form (6-17-06)
COMMITMENT FOR TITLE INSURANCE
ISSUED BY
WESTCOR LAND TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY
Westcor Land Title Insurance Company, a California Corporation,("Company"), for a valuable consideration,
hereby commits to issue its policy or policies of title insurance, as identified in Schedule A, in favor of the
Proposed Insured named in Schedule A, as owner or mortgagee of the estate or interest covered hereby in the
land described or referred to in Schedule A, upon payment of the premiums and charges and compliance with
the Requirements; all subject to the provisions of Schedule A and B and to the Conditions of this Commitment.
This Commitment shall be effective only when the identity of the Proposed Insured and the amount of the policy
or policies committed for have been inserted in Schedule A hereof by the Company.
All liability and obligations under this Commitment shall cease and terminate within six (6) months after the
Effective Date or when the policy or policies committed for shall issue, whichever first occurs, provided that
the failure to issue such policy or policies is not the fault of the Company.
The Company will provide a sample of the policy form upon request.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, WESTCOR LAND TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY has caused its corporate
name and seal to be hereunto affixed and these presents to be signed in facsimile under authority of its by-laws
on the date shown in Schedule A.
Issued By: WESTCOR LAND TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY
Countersigned:
Authorized Signature
CO 1045 * *
Pitkin County Title, Inc.
601 E. Hopkins #3
Aspen, CO 81611
Exhibit B | Application
37
CONDITIONS AND STIPULATIONS
1. The term "mortgage", when used herein, shall include deed of trust, trust deed or other security instrument.
2. If the Proposed Insured has or acquires actual knowledge of any defect, lien, encumbrance, adverse claim or
other matter affecting the estate or interest or mortgage thereon covered by this Commitment other than
those shown in Schedule B hereof, and shall fail to disclose such knowledge to the Company in writing, the
Company shall be relieved from liability for any loss or damage resulting from any act of reliance hereon to
the extent the Company is prejudiced by failure to so disclose such knowledge. If the Proposed Insured shall
disclose such knowledge to the Company, or if the Company otherwise acquires actual knowledge of any
such defect, lien or encumbrance, adverse claim or other matter, the Company at its option may amend
Schedule B of this Commitment accordingly, but such amendment shall not relieve the Company from
liability previously incurred pursuant to paragraph 3 of these Conditions and Stipulations.
3. Liability of the Company under this Commitment shall be only to the named Proposed Insured and such
parties included under the definition of Insured in the form of policy or policies committed for and only for
actual loss incurred in reliance hereon in undertaking in good faith (a) to comply with the requirements
hereof, or (b) to eliminate exceptions shown in Schedule B, or (c) to acquire or create the estate or interest
or mortgage thereon covered by this Commitment In no event shall such liability exceed the amount stated
in Schedule A for the policy or policies committed for and such liability is subject to the insuring provisions
and Conditions and Stipulations and the Exclusions from Coverage of the form of policy or policies
committed for in favor of the Proposed Insured which are hereby incorporated by reference and are made a
part of this Commitment except as expressly modified herein.
4. This Commitment is a contract to issue one or more title insurance policies and is not an abstract of title or a
report of the condition of title. Any action or actions or rights of action that the Proposed Insured may have
or may bring against the Company arising out of the status of the title to the estate or interest or the status of
the mortgage thereon covered by this Commitment must be based on and are subject to the provisions of
this Commitment.
5. The policy to be issued contains an arbitration clause. All arbitrable matters when the Amount of Insurance is $2,000,000.00 or
less shall be arbitrated at the option of either the Company or the Insured as the exclusive remedy of the parties. You may review
a copy of the arbitration rules at http://www.alta.org.
Exhibit B | Application
38
COMMITMENT FOR TITLE INSURANCE
SCHEDULE A
1. Effective Date: November 30, 2021 at 8:00 AM Case No. PCT25725W
2. Policy or Policies to be issued:
(a) ALTA Owner's Policy-(8/1/2016) Amount$
Premium$
Proposed Insured: Rate:
TO BE DETERMINED
(b) ALTA Loan Policy-(8/1/2016) Amount$
Premium$
Proposed Insured: Rate:
(c) ALTA Loan Policy-(8/1/2016) Amount$
Premium$
Proposed Insured: Rate:
3. Title to the FEE SIMPLE estate or interest in the land described or referred to in this Commitment is at the
effective date hereof vested in:
CITY OF ASPEN, a Colorado home rule municipal corporation
4. The land referred to in this Commitment is situated in the County of PITKIN State of COLORADO and is
described as follows:
LOT 3, COMMUNICATIONS CENTER SUBDIVISION, according to the Plat thereof
recorded October 3, 1988 in Plat Book 21 at Page 34.
PITKIN COUNTY TITLE, INC. Schedule A-PG.1
601 E. HOPKINS, ASPEN, CO. 81611 This Commitment is invalid
970-925-1766 Phone/970-925-6527 Fax unless the Insuring
877-217-3158 Toll Free Provisions and Schedules
A and B are attached.
AUTHORIZED AGENT
Countersigned:
Exhibit B | Application
39
SCHEDULE B - SECTION 1
REQUIREMENTS
The following are the requirements to be complied with:
ITEM (a) Payment to or for the account of the grantors or mortgagors of the full consideration for the
estate or interest to be insured.
ITEM (b) Proper instrument(s) creating the estate or interest to be insured must be executed and duly
filed for record to-wit:
THIS COMMITMENT IS FURNISHED FOR INFORMATIONAL PURPOSES ONLY, IT IS NOT A
CONTRACT TO ISSUE TITLE INSURANCE AND SHALL NOT BE CONSTRUED AS SUCH. IN THE
EVENT A PROPOSED INSURED IS NAMED THE COMPANY HEREBY RESERVES THE RIGHT TO
MAKE ADDITIONAL REQUIREMENTS AND/OR EXCEPTIONS AS DEEMED NECESSARY. THE
RECIPIENT OF THIS INFORMATIONAL REPORT HEREBY AGREES THAT THE COMPANY HAS
ISSUED THIS REPORT BY THEIR REQUEST AND ALTHOUGH WE BELIEVE ALL INFORMATION
CONTAINED HEREIN IS ACCURATE AND CORRECT, THE COMPANY SHALL NOT BE CHARGED
WITH ANY FINANCIAL LIABILITY SHOULD THAT PROVE TO BE INCORRECT AND THE COMPANY
IS NOT OBLIGATED TO ISSUE ANY POLICIES OF TITLE INSURANCE.
Exhibit B | Application
40
SCHEDULE B SECTION 2
EXCEPTIONS
The policy or policies to be issued will contain exceptions to the following unless the same are disposed of to
the satisfaction of the Company:
1. Rights or claims of parties in possession not shown by the public records.
2. Easements, or claims of easements, not shown by the public records.
3. Discrepancies, conflicts in boundary lines, shortage in area, encroachments, any facts which a correct
survey and inspection of the premises would disclose and which are not shown by the public records.
4. Any lien, or right to a lien, for services, labor, or material heretofore or hereafter furnished, imposed by law
and not shown by the public records.
5. Defects, liens, encumbrances, adverse claims or other matters, if any, created, first appearing in the public
records or attaching subsequent to the effective date hereof but prior to the date the proposed insured
acquires of record for value the estate or interest or mortgage thereon covered by this Commitment.
6. Taxes due and payable; and any tax, special assessment, charge or lien imposed for water or sewer
service or for any other special taxing district.
7. Right of the proprietor of a vein or lode to extract and remove his ore therefrom, should the same be found
to penetrate or intersect the premises hereby granted and right of way for ditches or canals constructed by
the authority of the United States as reserved in United States Patent recorded March 16, 1923 in Book 55
at Page 570.
8. Easement and right of way for the installation, operation, maintenance, repair and replacement of a bicycle
trail, as granted by Safeway Stores, Inc. to Pitkin County Board of Commissioners by instrument recorded
April 11, 1978 in Book 345 at Page 975.
9. Terms, conditions, provisions, obligations and all matters as set forth in Resolution of the Board of County
Commissioners recorded May 18, 1981 in Book 408 at Page 663 as Resolution No. 81-34.
10. Easement and right of way for underground electric lines purposes, as granted by Micro-Cable
Communication to Holy Cross Electric Association, by instrument recorded January 14, 1982 in Book 419
at page 805, said easement being that portion which lies within subject property as described in said
instrument as evidenced by Improvement Survey of Aspen Survey Engineers dated October 21, 2005, Job
#10358B.
11. Easement and right of way for electric line purposes, as granted to Holy Cross Electric Association, by
instrument recorded September 27, 1974 in Book 291 at Page 647, January 14, 1982 in Book 419 at Page
807 and in Book 582 at Page 227.
12. Terms, conditions, provisions, obligations and all matters as set forth in Resolution of the Board of County
Commissioners recorded July 21, 1982 in Book 429 at Page 575 as Resolution No. 82-67.
13. Terms, conditions, provisions, obligations and all matters as set forth in Resolution of the Board of County
Commissioners recorded April 18, 1983 in Book 443 at Page 641 as Resolution No. 83-35 and Water
Drainage Requirements Memo recorded July 24, 1985 in Book 491 at Page 640.
14. Terms, conditions, provisions, obligations and all matters as set forth in Resolution of the Board of County
Commissioners recorded July 15, 1985 in Book 489 at Page 784 as Resolution No. 85-77.
(Continued)
Exhibit B | Application
41
SCHEDULE B SECTION 2
EXCEPTIONS - (Continued)
15. Easements, rights of way and all matters as disclosed on Plat of Communications Center recorded July 24,
1985 in Plat Book 17 at Page 52 and First Amended Plat recorded April 14, 1988 in Plat Book 20 at Page 73
and Communication Center Subdivision Plat recorded July 27, 1988 in Plat Book 21 at Page 34 and
Resolution of the Board of County Commissioners No. 88-73 recorded October 9, 2019 as Reception No.
659394.
16. First Amendment to Condominium Declaration for the Communication Center, a Condominium recorded July
30, 1990 in Book 625 at Page 979.
17. Easement and right of way to construct, reconstruct, repair, change, enlarge, rephase, operate and maintain
an electric transmission or distribution system, as granted by Ralph H. Woodward to Holy Cross Electric
Association by instrument recorded November 12, 1991, in Book 661 at Page 822.
18. Easement and right of way to operate and maintain such telecommunications facilities as are currently in place
or which may be added from time to time in the future within the conduit structure currently in place, as
granted by Ralph H. Woodward to U.S. West Communications, Inc. by instrument recorded January 29, 1997,
at Reception No. 401340.
19. Terms, conditions, provisions, obligations and all matters as set forth in Resolution of the Board of County
Commissioners of Pitkin County, Colorado recorded August 17, 1999 as Reception No. 434491 as Resolution
No. 99-112.
20. Easement and right of way for construction, maintenance of roadway, utilities, drainage and bike path
purposes, as granted by Ralph H. Woodward to Department of Transportation, State of Colorado, by
instrument recorded September 1, 2000, at Reception No. 446652.
21. Terms, conditions, provisions, obligations and all matters as set forth in Resolution of the Board of County
Commissioners of Pitkin County, Colorado recorded January 3, 2017 as Reception No. 635142 as Resolution
No. 126-2016.
22. Easements, rights of way and all matters as disclosed on Aspen Mini Storage LLC Parking Area Site Plan
recorded January 23, 2017 in Plat Book 117 at Page 65.
23. Any and all leases or tenancies whether or not they are shown in the public record.
24. Encroachments and all matters as disclosed by Survey of High Country Engineering, Inc. dated October 21,
2019 as Job No. 2191693.
25. NOTE: The title commitment is subject to underwriting approval. The Company reserves the right to make
changes.
Exhibit B | Application
42
ENDORSEMENT SCHEDULE FOR OWNERS POLICY
ATTACHED TO AND BECOMING A PART OF CASE NO: PCT25725W
SELLER:
CITY OF ASPEN, a Colorado home rule municipal corporation
BUYER:
TO BE DETERMINED
The following endorsements will be issued in connection with the Policy to be issued hereunder as referenced above:
ENDORSEMENTS: For a fee of: $
For a fee of: $
For a fee of: $
For a fee of: $
For a fee of: $
Upon compliance with the requirements set forth below, the following exceptions will be deleted from the final policy.
The fee for deleting exceptions 1 thru 3 is $55.00
A satisfactory affidavit and agreement indemnifying the Company against any defects, liens, encumbrances, adverse
claims, or other matters known by Seller and Buyer.
The Company hereby reserves the right to make additional requirements as may be deemed necessary in the event
information regarding defects, liens, encumbrances, adverse claims, or the like are discovered.
The fee for deleting exception 4 is $10.00 for Residential Property and $25.00 for Commercial Property.
Exception Number 5 is automatically deleted upon recordation of the documents called for on the requirement page of this
commitment.
Exception Number 6 will be amended to read: Taxes for the current year not yet due or payable, upon evidence
satisfactory that the Taxes for the prior year(s) have been paid.
NOTE: A satisfactory affidavit and agreement indemnifying the Company against unfiled mechanic's and
materialmens liens, executed by the seller and any additional parties deemed necessary by the Company.
The company hereby reserves the right to make additional requirements as may be deemed necessary in
the event additional facts regarding development, construction or other building or work are disclosed to
the company that may fall within any lien period as defined in the Statues of the State of Colorado, and
may result in additional premiums and/or fees for such coverage and any additional requirements deemed
necessary by the Company.
The Company hereby reserves the right to deny any of the above coverage's at its sole discretion.
Exhibit B | Application
43
PITKIN COUNTY TITLE, INC.
Disclosures
Water rights, claims or title to water. (NOTE: THIS EXCEPTION WILL APPEAR ON THE OWNER'S AND
MORTGAGE POLICY TO BE ISSUED HEREUNDER)
All documents received for recording or filing in the Clerk and Recorder's office shall contain a top margin of at least one inch and a
left, right and bottom margin of at least one half of an inch. The Clerk and Recorder will refuse to record or file any document that
does not conform to the requirements of this section. Pursuant to C.R.S. 30-10-406(3)(a).
The company will not issue its policy or policies of title insurance contemplated by this commitment until it has been provided a
Certificate of Taxes due or other equivalent documentation from the County Treasurer or the County Treasurer's authorized agent: or
until the Proposed Insured has notified or instructed the company in writing to the contrary. Pursuant to C.R.S. 10-11-122.
No person or entity that provides closing and settlement services for a real estate transaction shall disburse funds as a part of such
services until those funds have been received and are available for immediate withdrawals as a matter of right. Pursuant to C.R.S.
38-35-125(2).
The Company hereby notifies the proposed buyer in the current transaction that there may be recorded evidence that the mineral estate,
or portion thereof, has been severed, leased, or otherwise conveyed from the surface estate. If so, there is a substantial likelihood that a
third party holds some or all interest in the oil, gas, other minerals, or geothermal energy in the subject property. Such mineral estate
may include the right to enter and use the property without the surface owner's permission. Pursuant to C.R.S. 10-11-123.
If this transaction includes a sale of property and the sales price exceeds $100,000.00, the seller must comply with the
disclosure/withholding requirements of said section. (Nonresident withholding) Pursuant to C.R.S. 39-22-604.5.
Notice is hereby given that: The subject property may be located in a special taxing district. A Certificate of Taxes due listing each
taxing jurisdiction shall be obtained from the County Treasurer or the County Treasurer's authorized agent. Information regarding
special districts and the boundaries of such districts may be obtained from the Board of County Commissioners, the County Clerk and
Recorder, or the County Assessor. Pursuant to C.R.S. 10-11-122.
Notice is hereby given that: Pursuant to Colorado Division of Insurance Regulation 8-1-2;
"Gap Protection" -When this Company conducts the closing and is responsible for recording or filing the legal documents
resulting from the transaction, the Company shall be responsible for all matters which appear on the record prior to such time or
recording or filing; and
"Mechanic's Lien Protection" - If you are the buyer of a single family residence, you may request mechanic's lien coverage to be
issued on your policy of Insurance. If the property being purchased has not been the subject of construction, improvements or
repairs in the last six months prior to the date of this commitment, the requirements will be payment of the appropriate premium
and the completion of an Affidavit and Indemnity by the seller. If the property being purchased was constructed, improved or
repaired within six months prior to the date of this commitment the requirements may involve disclosure of certain financial
information, payment of premiums, and indemnity, among others. The general requirements stated above are subject to revision
and approval by the Company. Pursuant to C.R.S. 10-11-122.
Notice is hereby given that an ALTA Closing Protection Letter is available, upon request, to certain parties to the transaction
as noted in the title commitment. Pursuant to Colorado Division of Insurance Regulation 8-1-3.
Nothing herein contained will be deemed to obligate the Company to provide any of the coverages referred to herein unless
the above conditions are fully satisfied
NOTE: The policy(s) of insurance may contain a clause permitting arbitration of claims at the request of either
the Insured or the Company. Upon request, the Company will provide a copy of this clause and the
accompanying arbitration rules prior to the closing of the transaction.
NOTICE REGARDING CONSTRUCTION FINANCING: If it is not disclosed to the company that the loan to be
insured hereunder is in fact a construction loan, any coverage given under the final policy regarding
mechanic or materialmen's liens shall be deemed void and of no effect.
Exhibit B | Application
44
Pitkin County Title, Inc.
Privacy Policy
We collect nonpublic information about you from the following sources:
• Information we receive from you, such as your name, address, telephone
number, or social security number;
• Information about your transactions with us, our affiliates, or others. We
receive this information from your lender, attorney, real estate broker, etc.; and
Information from public records
We do not disclose any nonpublic personal information about our customers or former
customers to anyone, except as permitted by law.
We restrict access to nonpublic personal information about you to those employees
who need to know that information to provide the products or services requested by
you or your lender.
We maintain physical, electronic, and procedural safeguards that company with
appropriate federal and state regulations.
Exhibit B | Application
45
Notice of Privacy Policy
of
Westcor Land Title Insurance Company
Westcor Land Title Insurance Company ("WLTIC") values its customers and is committed to protecting the privacy of
personal information. In keeping with that philosophy, we have developed a Privacy Policy, set out below, that will
ensure the continued protection of your nonpublic personal information and inform you about the measures WLTIC takes
to safeguard that information.
Who is Covered
We provide our Privacy Policy to each customer when they purchase an WLTIC title insurance policy. Generally, this
means that the Privacy Policy is provided to the customer at the closing of the real estate transaction.
Information Collected
In the normal course of business and to provide the necessary services to our customers, we may obtain nonpublic
personal information directly from the customer, from customer-related transactions, or from third parties such as our title
insurance agents, lenders, appraisers, surveyors or other similar entities.
Access to Information
Access to all nonpublic personal information is limited to those employees who have a need to know in order to perform
their jobs. These employees include, but are not limited to, those in departments such as legal, underwriting, claims
administration and accounting.
Information Sharing
Generally, WLTIC does not share nonpublic personal information that it collects with anyone other than its policy issuing
agents as needed to complete the real estate settlement services and issue its title insurance policy as requested by the
consumer. WLTIC may share nonpublic personal information as permitted by law with entities with whom WLTIC has a
joint marketing agreement. Entities with whom WLTIC has a joint marketing agreement have agreed to protect the
privacy of our customer's nonpublic personal information by utilizing similar precautions and security measures as
WLTIC uses to protect this information and to use the information for lawful purposes. WLTIC, however, may share
information as required by law in response to a subpoena, to a government regulatory agency or to prevent fraud.
Information Security
WLTIC, at all times, strives to maintain the confidentiality and integrity of the personal information in its possession and
has instituted measures to guard against its unauthorized access. We maintain physical, electronic and procedural
safeguards in compliance with federal standards to protect that information.
The WLTIC Privacy Policy can also be found on WLTIC's website at www.wltic.com.
Exhibit B | Application
46
Exhibit B | Application
47
PITKIN COUNTY TITLE, INC.
601 E. HOPKINS, THIRD FLOOR
ASPEN, CO 81611
970-925-1766/970-925-6527 FAX
TOLL FREE 877-217-3158
WIRING INSTRUCTIONS FOR ALL TRANSACTIONS REGARDING THE CLOSING OF THIS FILE
ARE AS FOLLOWS:
ALPINE BANK-ASPEN
600 E. HOPKINS AVE.
ASPEN, CO. 81611
ABA ROUTING NO. 102103407
FOR CREDIT TO:
PITKIN COUNTY TITLE, INC., ESCROW ACCOUNT
ACCOUNT NO. 8910 354 425
REFERENCE:PCT25725W/TO BE DETERMINED
Exhibit B | Application
48
Exhibit B | Application
49
2.0' WITNESS CORNERSET #5 REBAR & 1-1/4"BLUE PLASTIC CAP WCTNC PLS38215FOUND #5 REBAR &1-1/4" YELLOW PLASTICCAP LS16129FOUND #5 REBAR & 1-1/4" YELLOWPLASTIC CAP HCE LS19598FOUND #4REBAR &1" REDPLASTIC CAP ILLEGIBLEFOUND #5REBAR & 1-1/2"ALUMINUMCAP LS31551FOUND #5REBAR & 1-1/4"YELLOW PLASTICCAP LS238759.7' WITNESS CORNERFOUND #5 REBAR & 2"ALUMINUM CAP LS23875LOT 2COMMUNICATIONS CENTER SUBDIVISIONPLAT BOOK 21-PAGE 34OWNER: TCI OF NORTH NEW JERSEY INCPARCEL NO. 2735-031-02-002LOT 3QWEST/CITY OF ASPENSUBDIVISION EXEMPTION LOTLINE ADJUSTMENTPLAT BOOK 61 - PAGE 24OWNER: ASPEN BUSINESS PARKINVESTORS LLCPARCEL NO. 2735-031-01-003N84°34'00"E 201.89'PLAT=201.92'R=2160.00'L=182.99'CB=S10°29'43"WCH=182.93'PLAT=S10°32'21"W 182.94'PLAT=N84°34'00"E 229.50'N84°37'50"E 229.84'S06°41'33"E 216.3
5
'
PLAT=S06°38'00"E
2
1
6
.
1
7
'PLAT=S84°34'00"WS84°37'22"W 435.05'R=1960.00'L=399.42'CB=N07°57'33"WCH=398.73'PLAT=N07°54'08"W 398.70'PLAT=L=399.39'AMERICANROADWOODWARD LANECOLORADOSTATEHIGHWAYNO. 8210' SEWER EASEMENTBOOK 253 PAGE 21020' UTILITY EASEMENTPLAT BOOK 21 PAGE 3420' UTILITY EASEMENTPLAT BOOK 21 PAGE 34 30' ROAD EASEMENTPLAT BOOK 21 PAGE 3410' ELECTRIC EASEMENTPLAT BOOK 21 PAGE 34BOOK 291 PAGE 64715' CABLE T.V. EASEMENTPLAT BOOK 21 PAGE 34AND15' WIDE BICYCLE TRAILEASEMENTBOOK 345 PAGE 97510' UTILITY EASEMENTPLAT BOOK 21 PAGE 34BOOK 291 PAGE 64715' ACCESS EASEMENTPLAT BOOK 21 PAGE 34LOT 3COMMUNICATIONS CENTERSUBDIVISIONPLAT BOOK 21 PAGE 342.977± ACRESLOT 2 - BLOCK-1AMENDED AND RESTATED PLAT OF ASPENAIRPORT BUSINESS CENTER FILING NO. 1PLAT BOOK 7 - PAGE 79OWNER: CITY OF ASPENPARCEL NO. 2735-031-01-802PAVED ROADWAYLOT 1COMMUNICATIONS CENTER SUBDIVISIONPLAT BOOK 21-PAGE 34OWNER: TCI OF NORTH NEW JERSEY INCPARCEL NO. 2735-031-02-001GREENBELT AREAPLAT BOOK 7 - PAGE 79OWNER: PITKIN COUNTYPARCEL NO. 2643-344-00-852COVENANTNO BUILDINGS ORIMPROVEMENTSPLAT BOOK 17 PAGE 52BASIS OF BEARINGSS13°07'19"E14.33'20' H
O
L
Y
C
R
O
S
S
O
V
E
R
H
E
A
D
ELEC
T
R
I
C
E
A
S
E
M
E
N
T
BOO
K
4
1
9
P
A
G
E
8
0
7
BOO
K
5
8
2
P
A
G
E
2
2
7 10' HOLY CROSSUNDERGROUNDELECTRIC EASEMENTBOOK 661 PAGE 82210' U.S. WESTCOMMUNICATIONSTELEPHONE EASEMENTRECEPTION NO. 401340PERMANENT EASEMENT FORCONSTRUCTION, MAINTENANCEOF ROADWAY, UTILITIES,DRAINAGE & BIKE PATHTO CDOTRECEPTION 446652(VARIABLE WIDTH)NOTES:5.THIS ANNEXATION PLAT DOES NOT CONSTITUTE A TITLE SEARCH BY TRUE NORTHCOLORADO, LLC FOR ALL INFORMATION REGARDING EASEMENT, RIGHTS-OF-WAYAND/OR TITLE OF RECORD, TRUE NORTH COLORADO, LLC. RELIED UPON TITLECOMMITMENT CASE NO. PCT25456W ISSUED BY PITKIN COUNTY TITLE INC, EFFECTIVEDATE: SEPTEMBER 26, 2019LEGENDSURVEYOR'S STATEMENTBY ME AND THAT IT IS TRUE AND CORRECT TOTHE BEST OF MY BELIEF AND KNOWLEDGE.SECTION 3, TOWNSHIP 10 SOUTH, RANGE 85 WEST OF THE 6TH PMCOUNTY OF PITKIN, STATE OF COLORADOLOT 3 COMMUNICATIONS CENTER SUBDIVISION ANNEXATION PLAT TRUE NORTH COLORADO LLC.A LAND SURVEYING AND MAPPING COMPANYP.O. BOX 614 - 386 MAIN STREET UNIT 3NEW CASTLE, COLORADO 81647(970) 984-0474www.truenorthcolorado.comPROJECT NO: 2021-372DATE:October 21, 2021DRAWNRPKSURVEYEDGBLSHEET1 OF 1TRUENORTHA LAND SURVEYING AND MAPPING COMPANY30'15'60'SCALE: 1" = 30'NPROPERTY DESCRIPTION:0NOTICE: ACCORDING TO COLORADO LAW YOU MUST COMMENCE ANYLEGAL ACTION BASED UPON ANY DEFECT IN THIS SURVEY WITHIN THREEYEARS AFTER YOU FIRST DISCOVER SUCH DEFECT. IN NO EVENT MAY ANYACTION BASED UPON ANY DEFECT IN THIS SURVEY BE COMMENCED MORETHAN TEN YEARS FROM THE DATE OF CERTIFICATION SHOWN HEREON.CONTIGUOUS CITY OF ASPEN LIMITSVICINITY MAPSITEANNEXATION DATATOTAL BOUNDARY= 1665.54 LINEAR FEETCONTIGUOUS BOUNDARY = 435.05 LINEAR FEETRATIO= 1: 3.828AREA= 2.977 ACRESCITY OF ASPEN ENGINEER'S APPROVALCITY COUNCIL APPROVALCITY OF ASPEN COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DIRECTOR'S APPROVALCLERK AND RECORDER'S CERTIFICATEORFREVIEWExhibit B | Application50
Attachment D Vicinity Map
Exhibit B | Application
51
GMETAL LEAN-TO LUMBERSTORAGE BUILDING322.3'S320.7'24.2'EDGE OF PAVEMENTEEDYHINLET7775.23INLET7775.39GRAVEL PARKING - STORAGE AREAROCK WALL
180.7'180.7'20.4'
20.4'INLET7771.24INLET7772.75INLET7771.14METAL STORAGE BUILDINGMETAL STORAGE BUIL
D
I
N
G METAL STORAGE BUILDING25.0'30.0'30.0'20.0'INLET7771.2225.0'30.0'30.0'20.0'15.5'(TIE)BUILDING20.0'5.0'25.0'60.6'
97.8'
35.0'
105.7'
105.7'
105.7'
105.7'
105.7'
105.7'
135.7'
135.7'185.7'185.7'20.0'
20.0'
EDGE OF PAVEMENT
METAL STORAGE BUIL
D
I
N
G
METAL STORAGE BUILD
I
N
G
METAL STORAGE BUILD
I
N
G
METAL STORAGE BUILD
I
N
G
105 WOODWARD LANE
2.0' WITNESS CORNERSET #5 REBAR & 1-1/4"BLUE PLASTIC CAP WCTNC PLS38215FOUND #5 REBAR &1-1/4" YELLOW PLASTICCAP LS16129ROCK RETAININGSITE BENCH MARKFOUND #5 REBAR & 1-1/4" YELLOWPLASTIC CAP HCE LS19598ELEVATION: 7775.13FOUND #4REBAR &1" REDPLASTIC CAP ILLEGIBLEFOUND #5REBAR & 1-1/2"ALUMINUMCAP LS31551FOUND #5REBAR & 1-1/4"YELLOW PLASTICCAP LS23875PAVED ROADWAY
PAVED DRIVE
PAVED DRIVE2'± ELEVATION DROPBETWEEN CONCRETE &PAVEMENTALONG THIS LINE4' WIDE CONCRETE DRAINAGE PAN
9.7' WITNESS CORNERFOUND #5 REBAR & 2"ALUMINUM CAP LS238759.7'(TIE)CONCRETE RETAINING WALLLOT 2COMMUNICATIONS CENTERSUBDIVISIONLOT 1COMMUNICATIONS CENTERSUBDIVISIONLOT 3QWEST/CITY OF ASPENSUBDIVISION EXEMPTIONLOT LINE ADJUSTMENTPAVED PATH AMERICANROADWOODWARD LANECOLORADOSTATEHIGHWAYNO. 82NORTH BOUND LANE - PAVED ROADWAY GREENBELT AREAPLAT BOOK 7PAGE 7920' UTILITY EASEMENTPLAT BOOK 21 PAGE 3420' UTILITY EASEMENTPLAT BOOK 21 PAGE 34 30' ROAD EASEMENTPLAT BOOK 21 PAGE 3415' ACCESS EASEMENTPLAT BOOK 21 PAGE 34LOT 3COMMUNICATIONS CENTERSUBDIVISION2.977± ACRES77797
7
7
8 77727773777577807785779077807785778577857783 7780778077807778 77777780 77757777777577757774 PAVED ROADWAYN84°34'00"E 201.89'PLAT=201.92'R=2160.00'L=182.99'CB=S10°29'43"WCH=182.93'PLAT=S10°32'21"W 182.94'PLAT=N84°34'00"E 229.50'N84°37'50"E 229.84'S06°41'33"E 216.3
5
'
PLAT=S06°38'00"E
2
1
6
.
1
7
'S84°37'22"W 435.05'PLAT=S84°34'00"WR=1960.00'L=399.42'CB=N07°57'33"WCH=398.73'PLAT=N07°54'08"W 398.70'PLAT=L=399.39'COVENANTNO BUILDINGS ORIMPROVEMENTSPLAT BOOK 17 PAGE 52BASIS OF BEARINGS20' HOLY CROSS OVERHEADELECTRIC EASEMENTBOOK 419 PAGE 807BOOK 582 PAGE 22710' HOLY CROSSUNDERGROUNDELECTRIC EASEMENTBOOK 661 PAGE 82210' U.S. WESTCOMMUNICATIONSTELEPHONE EASEMENTRECEPTION NO. 40134010' ELECTRIC EASEMENTPLAT BOOK 21 PAGE 34BOOK 291 PAGE 64715' CABLE T.V. EASEMENTPLAT BOOK 21 PAGE 34AND15' WIDE BICYCLE TRAILEASEMENTBOOK 345 PAGE 97510' UTILITY EASEMENTPLAT BOOK 21 PAGE 34BOOK 291 PAGE 647PERMANENT EASEMENT FORCONSTRUCTION, MAINTENANCEOF ROADWAY, UTILITIES,DRAINAGE & BIKE PATHTO CDOTRECEPTION 446652(VARIABLE WIDTH)NOTES:5. THIS SITE PLAN DOES NOT CONSTITUTE A TITLE SEARCH BY TRUE NORTH COLORADO, LLC FOR ALL INFORMATION REGARDINGEASEMENT, RIGHTS-OF-WAY AND/OR TITLE OF RECORD, TRUE NORTH COLORADO, LLC. RELIED UPON TITLE COMMITMENT CASENO. PCT25456W ISSUED BY PITKIN COUNTY TITLE INC, EFFECTIVE DATE: SEPTEMBER 26, 20196. ELEVATIONS SHOWN HEREON ARE BASED ON NORTH AMERICAN VERTICAL DATUM OF 1988 (NAVD 88)REFERENCED FROM NATIONAL GEODETIC SURVEY (NGS) STATION S 159 HAVING AN ELEVATION OF 7720.88.7. CONTOUR INTERVAL EQUALS 1 FOOT.8. UNDERGROUND UTILITIES SHOWN HEREON WERE LOCATED BY ROARING FORK UTILITY LOCATORS LLC. SANITARYSEWER LINES WERE PROVIDED BY ASPEN CONSOLIDATED SANITATION DISTRICT. UTILITIES SHOWN HEREON AREFOR PLANNING PURPOSES ONLY. PLEASE CALL 811 PRIOR TO ANY DIGGING OR EARTHWORK CONSTRUCTIONFOR UTILITY VERIFICATION.LOT 3 COMMUNICATIONS CENTER SUBDIVISION SECTION 3, TOWNSHIP 10 SOUTH, RANGE 85 WEST OF THE 6TH PMCOUNTY OF PITKIN, STATE OF COLORADOPD SITE PLANCATV PEDESTALDPOWER POLEGUY ANCHORSIGNSTORM DRAIN MANHOLEELECTRIC MANHOLEEWATER METERIRRIGATION VALVE BOXWIVBDRAINAGE INLETWATER LINESEWER LINETELEPHONE LINEFIBER OPTIC LINEGAS LINEOVERHEAD ELECTRIC LINE CATV LINEELECTRIC LINE TELEPHONE PEDESTALDYHSFIRE HYDRANTSANITARY MANHOLEELECTRICAL TRANSFORMERGAS METERELECTRICAL METERGLEGENDE30'15'60'SCALE: 1" = 30'N0CLEAN-OUTWATER VALVE BOXCDOT COMMUNICATION VAULTBOLLARDCHAIN-LINK FENCEWOOD FENCEA LAND SURVEYING AND MAPPING COMPANYP.O. BOX 614 - 386 MAIN STREET UNIT 3NEW CASTLE, COLORADO 81647(970) 984-0474www.truenorthcolorado.comDRAWNLDVSURVEYEDDJBSHEET1 OF 1TRUENORTHA LAND SURVEYING AND MAPPING COMPANYNOTICE: ACCORDING TO COLORADO LAW YOU MUST COMMENCE ANYLEGAL ACTION BASED UPON ANY DEFECT IN THIS SURVEY WITHIN THREEYEARS AFTER YOU FIRST DISCOVER SUCH DEFECT. IN NO EVENT MAY ANYACTION BASED UPON ANY DEFECT IN THIS SURVEY BE COMMENCED MORETHAN TEN YEARS FROM THE DATE OF CERTIFICATION SHOWN HEREON.VICINITY MAPSITESURVEYOR'S STATEMENTI, RODNEY P. KISER, DO HEREBY STATE THAT THIS SITE PLAN IS BASED ON A FIELD SURVEY IN SEPTEMBER OF 2020AND WAS PREPARED BY ME AND UNDER MY SUPERVISION AND RESPONSIBLE CHARGE AND THAT IT IS TRUE ANDCORRECT TO THE BEST OF MY BELIEF AND KNOWLEDGE.PROJECT NO: 2021-372DATE:October 22, 2021PROPERTY DESCRIPTION:Exhibit B | Application52
Exhibit B | Application
53
Exhibit B | Application
54
PRE-APPLICATION CONFERENCE SUMMARY
DATE: 10/19/21
PLANNER: Ben Anderson, Planner, City of Aspen, 429-2765
PROJECT NAME AND ADDRESS: 105 AABC (Pitkin County), Mini-Storage associated with the Lumberyard Project
PARCEL ID# 273503102003
REPRESENTATIVE: Bob Schultz, Representative for City Asset Department, 963-3670
DESCRIPTION: In 2020, The City of Aspen purchased a nearly 3-acre parcel in the AABC (Aspen Airport Business
Center). This recently acquired property, which is located in unincorporated Pitkin County, but within the Urban
Growth Boundary is anticipated to be combined with other adjacent properties (including the “Lumberyard”
property) in the creation of an affordable housing development. The property currently contains a mini-storage
facility and related uses and structures.
Prior to the future Land Use actions that would grant the full entitlements to the eventual project, an application
related to this PreApp is be limited to pursue: 1) annexation of the property into the City of Aspen, and 2) establish
a “holding” zone that would memorialize the existing development and use of the property until the final plan for
the site is developed and implemented.
It is proposed that the annexation and initial zoning of the property would be carried out through two ordinances.
The annexation process, which is outlined in a step-by-step description in the City of Aspen’s Annexation Plan,
would be handled in the first Ordinance.
The second Ordinance would establish the initial zoning on the property – which is proposed as SCI
(Service/Commercial/Industrial) with a Planned Development Overlay would recognize the current conditions of
the property, memorialize the existing development and use of the property, and limit the use until the eventual
affordable housing project is initiated. This second Ordinance would require a recommendation from COA’s
Planning and Zoning Commission prior to Council review. The Planned Development, as it will be defined and
limited by the existing conditions will be very limited in scope and shall be considered in single review by City
Council (separate reviews for project and detailed review are not necessary). It is anticipated that both Ordinances
will be considered concurrently.
Additional Items to consider:
1) This action – the process and steps, is recommended to be modeled after the 2011 action which
annexed and rezoned the adjacent Lumberyard process
2) The annexation shall be consistent with requirements as specified by the Colorado Revised Statutes
3) Because of the relatively small size of the proposed annexation (< 10 acres), this annexation does not
require the filing of an annexation report with the Pitkin County Board of County Commissioners (BOCC).
However, staff strongly encourages the applicant to reach out to Pitkin County for a letter or other
statement of support for the annexation and zoning actions.
Public Noticing will be required for several public hearings related to the proposed land use actions. Staff requires
that Enhanced Public Information is provided per 26.304.035 and strongly recommends that an Information
Exhibit B | Application
55
Meeting (in person, virtual, etc.) of some form be held to inform neighbors of the relationship of these land use
actions to the anticipated future project.
RELEVANT LAND USE CODE SECTIONS:
Section Number Section Title
26.304 Common Development Review Procedures
26.310 Amendments to the Text and Zone District Map
26.445 Planned Development
26.575.020 Calculations and Measurements
26.710.160 SCI Zone District
CRS 31-12-102…sequence – State Statutes Related to Annexation
See Attachment – City of Aspen’s Annexation Plan
For your convenience – links to the Land Use Application and Land Use Code are below:
Land Use Application Land Use Code
REVIEW BY: Community Development staff for complete application
Planning and Zoning Commission for Recommendation
City Council for Ordinances: Annexation and Planned Development/Rezoning
PUBLIC HEARING: Yes; P&Z and City Council
PLANNING FEES: $7,800 deposit for 24 hours of staff time (Additional/fewer hours billed/refunded at
$325 per hour)
REFERRAL FEES: City Engineering Department - $325; 1 hour deposit – additional hours will be billed as
necessary.
TOTAL DEPOSIT: $8,125
APPLICATION CHECKLIST – PLEASE EMAIL APPLICATION TO: ben.anderson@cityofaspen.com
Completed Land Use Application and signed Fee Agreement.
Pre-application Conference Summary (this document).
Street address and legal description of the parcel on which development is proposed to occur,
consisting of a current (no older than 6 months) certificate from a title insurance company, an
ownership and encumbrance report, or attorney licensed to practice in the State of Colorado, listing
the names of all owners of the property, and all mortgages, judgments, liens, easements, contracts and
agreements affecting the parcel, and demonstrating the owner’s right to apply for the Development
Application. The purpose of this requirement is to show that the Applicant has the authority to apply
for a Land Use Case.
A written description of the proposal and an explanation in written, graphic, or model form of how the
proposed development complies with the review standards relevant to the development application
and relevant land use approvals associated with the property. This should include responses to
Statutory and Local Annexation Criteria – as identified in COA’s Annexation Plan
An annexation plat/map
Draft of annexation petition
Exhibit B | Application
56
A site improvement survey (no older than a year from submittal) including topography, existing
structures, and vegetation showing the current status of the parcel certified by a registered land
surveyor by licensed in the State of Colorado. The survey and related information should document
the existing structures (floor plans, floor area and other dimensions) and uses on the property. While
an annexation report is not required, due to the size of the parcel, the survey could be a mechanism
to provide information that would typically be in the annexation report, as applicable.
HOA Compliance form (Attached to Application)
Once the copy is deemed complete by staff, the following items will then need to be submitted:
Total fee for review of the application.
Disclaimer:
The foregoing summary is advisory in nature only and is not binding on the City. The summary is based on
current zoning, which is subject to change in the future, and upon factual representations that may or may not
be accurate. The summary does not create a legal or vested right.
Exhibit B | Application
57
Attachment I Adjacent County Zoning
4,672
778.7
Legend
1:
WGS_1984_Web_Mercator_Auxiliary_Sphere
Feet0778.7389.36
Notes
Pitkin Maps & More
THIS MAP IS FOR INFORMATIONAL PURPOSES.
Pitkin County GIS makes no warranty or guarantee
concerning the completeness, accuracy, or reliability
of the content represented.
Map Created on 2:30 PM 10/07/21 at http://www.pitkinmapsandmore.com
State Highway
Road Centerline 4K
Primary Road
Secondary Road
Service Road
Full Address
Parcel Boundary
Zone District Labels
Zone District
AH Affordable Housing
AH/PUD Affordable Housing/PUD
AR-10 Agricultural/Residential (10
Acre)
AR-2 Agricultural/Residential (2 Acre)
B-1 Rural Business
B-2 Business
CD/PUD Conservation Development
I Industrial
LIR-35 Low Impact Residential (35
Acre)
Residential Multi-Family
MHP Moble Home Park
MHP/PUD Mobile Home Park PUD
P-I Public-Institutional
PUB Public
R-6 Medium Density Residential
R-15 Moderate Density Residential
R-15A Moderate Denisty Residential
R-15B Moderate Density Residential
R-30 Suburban Density Residential
RR Rural Remote
RS-160 Resource (160 Acre)
RS-20 Resource (20 Acre)
Exhibit B | Application
58
Attachment J Adjacent City Zoning
Existing County Zoning is B-2
Proposed City Zoning is SCI PD
Exhibit B | Application
59
Exhibit B | Application60
CITY OF ASPEN COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT
Homeowner Association Compliance Policy
All land use applications within the City of Aspen are required to include a Homeowner Association
Compliance Form (this form) certifying that the scope of work included in the land use application
complies with all applicable covenants and homeowner association policies. The certification must be
signed by the property owner or Attorney representing the property owner.
Property
Owner (“I”):
Name: Sara Ott, City Manager, City of Aspen, Colorado
Email: Sara.Ott@aspen.gov Phone No.: 970-920-5083
Address of 105 AABC (aka Woodward Ln.), Aspen, CO 81611 Property:
(subject of
application)
I certify as follows: (pick one)
This property is not subject to a homeowner association or other form of private c ovenant.
□ This property is subject to a homeowner association or private covenant, and the improvements proposed in this land use application do not require approval by the homeowners association or covenant beneficiary.
□ This property is subject to a homeowners association or private covenant and the improvements proposed in this land use application have been approved by the homeowners association or covenant beneficiary.
I understand this policy and I understand the City of Aspen does not interpret, enforce, or manage the
applicability, meaning or effect of private covenants or homeowner association rules or bylaws. I
understand that this document is a public document.
Owner signature: Date: 11/30/2021
Owner printed name: Sara G. Ott
or,
Attorney signature: Date:
Attorney printed name:
November 2021 City of Aspen|427 Rio Grande Place|(970) 920 5090
DocuSign Envelope ID: 7D7C5B06-B4A1-43B4-8338-B3F48227207D
Sara Ott
Exhibit B | Application
61
Land Use Application
Determination of Completeness
Date: January 13, 2022
Christopher Everson
City of Aspen
427 Rio Grande Pl.
Aspen, CO 81611
Dear Christopher,
We have received your land use application for the Aspen Mini Storage
Annexation Review (LPA-21-133) and reviewed it for completeness.
Your Land Use Application has been deemed Complete.
Other submission items may be requested throughout the review process as
deemed necessary by the Community Development Department. Ben will be the
staff planner for this project and his contact information is as follows:
ben.anderson@aspen.gov.
At this time, please submit the $8,125.00 deposit by contacting our administrative
staff for other payment options. The administrative staff may be reached during
normal business hours at 970-920-5090 or buildingadmins@cityofaspen.com.
Thank You,
Garrett Larimer, Senior Planner
City of Aspen, Community Development Department
Exhibit B | Application
62
Land Use Application
Determination of Completeness
Date: January 13, 2022
Christopher Everson
City of Aspen
427 Rio Grande Pl.
Aspen, CO 81611
Dear Christopher,
We have received your land use application for the Aspen Mini Storage
Annexation Review (LPA-21-133) and reviewed it for completeness.
Your Land Use Application has been deemed Complete.
Other submission items may be requested throughout the review process as
deemed necessary by the Community Development Department. Ben will be the
staff planner for this project and his contact information is as follows:
ben.anderson@aspen.gov.
At this time, please submit the $8,125.00 deposit by contacting our administrative
staff for other payment options. The administrative staff may be reached during
normal business hours at 970-920-5090 or buildingadmins@cityofaspen.com.
Thank You,
Garrett Larimer, Senior Planner
City of Aspen, Community Development Department
Exhibit B | Application
63
Aspen Mini Storage Annexation Request
Initial Zoning Map Request
Planned Development (Combined Project/Detailed)
105 AABC (aka Woodward Ln.)
Lot 3 of the Communications Center Subdivision
Parcel: 273503102003
Prepared for:
City of Aspen
130 S. Galena St.
Aspen, CO 81611
Prepared by:
Robert Schultz Consulting, LLC
354 Fawn Dr.
Carbondale, CO 81623
October 2021
Exhibit B | Application
64
Aspen Mini Storage Annexation, Initial Zoning, PD 2
Introduction
The City of Aspen acquired Lot 3 of the Communications Center Subdivision for future
development of affordable housing as part of a land assemblage with the adjacent City-owned
parcels.
At this time, the City applies to:
1.) annex the land, and,
2.) zone the property SCI PD to allow the existing storage use to continue without
expansion until future plans for housing are completed, approved, and ready for
construction. That will require initial zoning to be granted and adoption of the current
survey as defining the Planned Development.
The +/- 2.977-acre property is currently in unincorporated Pitkin County and within the Aspen
Urban Growth Boundary. The County zoning for the property is B-2 (General Business). The
current uses include 244 storage units, an office, and an apartment for the on-site manager.
Two of the seven storage buildings include basement level storage. There are also 27
commercial parking spaces at the site.
The Communications Center Subdivision is not part of the Aspen Airport Business Center but
rather was the subject of county subdivision in 1985. In 1988, it was re-subdivided to create Lot
3, the subject parcel. In 1990, Lot 3 was removed from the Condominium Declarations that
bound the subdivision.
The benefits of annexation to the City are that the existing +/- 27,587 square foot (sf) storage
operation will continue to operate and generate lease revenue for the City while ongoing
analysis and planning for future housing is completed. The lumber yard property to the south
was acquired and annexed for similar purposes in 2009 using the same process proposed in this
application. The annexation and interim SCI PD zoning are logical steps toward planning for the
entire assemblage of land and the ultimate redevelopment of the property while retaining lease
revenue from the operations on the property.
This property also provides the opportunity for a planned future connection between the Aspen
Airport Business Center and a proposed future intersection with SH 82 as directed by the
Colorado Department of Transportation’s Access Control Plan for the area. At the appropriate
time, a land use plan will be submitted to the City for rezoning and construction of affordable
housing.
Exhibit B | Application
65
Aspen Mini Storage Annexation, Initial Zoning, PD 3
Contents
Petition For Annexation Page 4
Statutory Annexation Criteria Page 5
Local Annexation Criteria Page 9
Initial Zoning Page 15
Planned Development Page 18
Schedule of Attachments Page 21
Exhibit B | Application
66
Aspen Mini Storage Annexation, Initial Zoning, PD 4
Exhibit B | Application
67
Aspen Mini Storage Annexation, Initial Zoning, PD 5
Statutory Annexation Criteria: 31-12-104 Eligibility
(1) No unincorporated area may be annexed to a municipality unless one of the conditions set
forth in section 30 (1) of article II of the state constitution first has been met. An area is eligible
for annexation if the provisions of section 30 of article II of the state constitution have been
complied with and the governing body, at a hearing as provided in section 31-12-109, finds and
determines:
(a) That not less than one-sixth of the perimeter of the area proposed to be annexed is contiguous
with the annexing municipality. Contiguity shall not be affected by the existence of a platted
street or alley, a public or private right-of-way, a public or private transportation right-of-way or
area, public lands, whether owned by the state, the United States, or an agency thereof, except
county-owned open space, or a lake, reservoir, stream, or other natural or artificial waterway
between the annexing municipality and the land proposed to be annexed. Subject to the
requirements imposed by section 31-12-105 (1)(e), contiguity may be established by the
annexation of one or more parcels in a series, which annexations may be completed
simultaneously and considered together for the purposes of the public hearing required by
sections 31-12-108 and 31-12-109 and the annexation impact report required by section 31-12-
108.5.
(b) That a community of interest exists between the area proposed to be annexed and the
annexing municipality; that said area is urban or will be urbanized in the near future; and that
said area is integrated with or is capable of being integrated with the annexing municipality. The
fact that the area proposed to be annexed has the contiguity with the annexing municipality
required by paragraph (a) of this subsection (1) shall be a basis for a finding of compliance with
these requirements unless the governing body, upon the basis of competent evidence presented at
the hearing provided for in section 31-12-109, finds that at least two of the following are shown
to exist:
(I) Less than fifty percent of the adult residents of the area proposed to be annexed make use of
part or all of the following types of facilities of the annexing municipality: Recreational, civic,
social, religious, industrial, or commercial; and less than twenty-five percent of said area’s adult
residents are employed in the annexing municipality. If there are no adult residents at the time of
the hearing, this standard shall not apply.
(II) One-half or more of the land in the area proposed to be annexed (including streets) is
agricultural, and the landowners of such agricultural land, under oath, express an intention to
devote the land to such agricultural use for a period of not less than five years.
(III) It is not physically practicable to extend to the area proposed to be annexed those urban
services which the annexing municipality provides in common to all of its citizens on the same
terms and conditions as such services are made available to such citizens. This standard shall not
apply to the extent that any portion of an area proposed to be annexed is provided or will within
the reasonably near future be provided with any service by or through a quasi-municipal
corporation.
Response: The total perimeter of Lot 3 of the Communications Center Subdivision is 1665.54
linear feet. The contiguous portion of the perimeter is 435.05 linear feet (see Attachment C).
One-sixth of the perimeter is 277.59 linear feet; thus the necessary contiguity is established.
None of the exceptions described in Section 1(b) are applicable.
Exhibit B | Application
68
Aspen Mini Storage Annexation, Initial Zoning, PD 6
(2)
(a) The contiguity required by paragraph (a) of subsection (1) of this section may not be
established by use of any boundary of an area which was previously annexed to the annexing
municipality if the area, at the time of its annexation, was not contiguous at any point with the
boundary of the annexing municipality, was not otherwise in compliance with paragraph (a) of
subsection (1) of this section, and was located more than three miles from the nearest boundary
of the annexing municipality, nor may such contiguity be established by use of any boundary of
territory which is subsequently annexed directly to, or which is indirectly connected through
subsequent annexations to, such an area.
(b) Because the creation or expansion of disconnected municipal satellites, which are sought to
be prohibited by this subsection (2), violates both the purposes of this article as expressed in
section 31-12-102 and the limitations of this article, any annexation which uses any boundary in
violation of this subsection (2) may be declared by a court of competent jurisdiction to be void
ab initio in addition to other remedies which may be provided. The provisions of section 31-12-
116 (2) and (4) and section 31-12-117 shall not apply to such an annexation. Judicial review of
such an annexation may be sought by any municipality having a plan in place pursuant to section
31-12-105 (1)(e) directly affected by such annexation, in addition to those described in section
31-12-116 (1). Such review may be, but need not be, instituted prior to the effective date of the
annexing ordinance and may include injunctive relief. Such review shall be brought no later than
sixty days after the effective date of the annexing ordinance or shall forever be barred.
(c) Contiguity is hereby declared to be a fundamental element in any annexation, and this
subsection (2) shall not in any way be construed as having the effect of legitimizing in any way
any noncontiguous annexation.
Response: No municipal satellite is proposed, the subject property is within the Aspen Urban
Growth Boundary and the adjacent contiguous parcel was previously annexed in accordance
with Section 1.
31-12-105 Limitations
(1) Notwithstanding any provisions of this part 1 to the contrary, the following limitations shall
apply to all annexations:
(a) In establishing the boundaries of any territory to be annexed, no land held in identical
ownership, whether consisting of one tract or parcel of real estate or two or more contiguous
tracts or parcels of real estate, shall be divided into separate parts or parcels without the written
consent of the landowners thereof unless such tracts or parcels are separated by a dedicated
street, road, or other public way.
(b) In establishing the boundaries of any area proposed to be annexed, no land held in identical
ownership, whether consisting of one tract or parcel of real estate or two or more contiguous
tracts or parcels of real estate, comprising twenty acres or more (which, together with the
buildings and improvements situated thereon has a valuation for assessment in excess of two
hundred thousand dollars for ad valorem tax purposes for the year next preceding the annexation)
shall be included under this part 1 without the written consent of the landowners unless such tract
of land is situated entirely within the outer boundaries of the annexing municipality as they exist
at the time of annexation. In the application of this paragraph (b), contiguity shall not be affected
by a dedicated street, road, or other public way.
Exhibit B | Application
69
Aspen Mini Storage Annexation, Initial Zoning, PD 7
(c) No annexation pursuant to section 31-12-106 and no annexation petition or petition for an
annexation election pursuant to section 31-12-107 shall be valid when annexation proceedings
have been commenced for the annexation of part or all of such territory to another municipality,
except in accordance with the provisions of section 31-12-114. For the purpose of this section,
proceedings are commenced when the petition is filed with the clerk of the annexing
municipality or when the resolution of intent is adopted by the governing body of the annexing
municipality if action on the acceptance of such petition or on the resolution of intent by the
setting of the hearing in accordance with section 31-12-108 is taken within ninety days after the
said filings if an annexation procedure initiated by petition for annexation is then completed
within the one hundred fifty days next following the effective date of the resolution accepting the
petition and setting the hearing date and if an annexation procedure initiated by resolution of
intent or by petition for an annexation election is prosecuted without unreasonable delay after the
effective date of the resolution setting the hearing date.
(d) As to any annexation which will result in the detachment of area from any school district and
the attachment of the same to another school district, no annexation pursuant to section 31-12-
106 or annexation petition or petition for an annexation election pursuant to section 31-12-107 is
valid unless accompanied by a resolution of the board of directors of the school district to which
such area will be attached approving such annexation.
(e)
(I) Except as otherwise provided in this paragraph (e), no annexation may take place that would
have the effect of extending a municipal boundary more than three miles in any direction from
any point of such municipal boundary in any one year. Within said three-mile area, the
contiguity required by section 31-12-104 (1)(a) may be achieved by annexing a platted street or
alley, a public or private right-of-way, a public or private transportation right-of-way or area, or a
lake, reservoir, stream, or other natural or artificial waterway. Prior to completion of any
annexation within the three-mile area, the municipality shall have in place a plan for that area
that generally describes the proposed location, character, and extent of streets, subways, bridges,
waterways, waterfronts, parkways, playgrounds, squares, parks, aviation fields, other public
ways, grounds, open spaces, public utilities, and terminals for water, light, sanitation,
transportation, and power to be provided by the municipality and the proposed land uses for the
area. Such plan shall be updated at least once annually. Such three-mile limit may be exceeded if
such limit would have the effect of dividing a parcel of property held in identical ownership if at
least fifty percent of the property is within the three-mile limit. In such event, the entire property
held in identical ownership may be annexed in any one year without regard to such mileage
limitation. Such three-mile limit may also be exceeded for the annexation of an enterprise zone.
(II) Prior to completion of an annexation in which the contiguity required by section 31-12-104
(1)(a) is achieved pursuant to subparagraph (I) of this paragraph (e), the municipality shall annex
any of the following parcels that abut a platted street or alley, a public or private right-of-way, a
public or private transportation right-of-way or area, or a lake, reservoir, stream, or other natural
or artificial waterway, where the parcel satisfies all of the eligibility requirements pursuant to
section 31-12-104 and for which an annexation petition has been received by the municipality no
later than forty-five days prior to the date of the hearing set pursuant to section 31-12-108 (1):
(A) Any parcel of property that has an individual schedule number for county tax filing purposes
upon the petition of the owner of such parcel;
Exhibit B | Application
70
Aspen Mini Storage Annexation, Initial Zoning, PD 8
(B) Any subdivision that consists of only one subdivision filing upon the petition of the requisite
number of property owners within the subdivision as determined pursuant to section 31-12-107;
and
(C) Any subdivision filing within a subdivision that consists of more than one subdivision filing
upon the petition of the requisite number of property owners within the subdivision filing as
determined pursuant to section 31-12-107.
(e.1) The parcels described in subparagraph (II) of paragraph (e) of this subsection (1) shall be
annexed under the same or substantially similar terms and conditions and considered at the same
hearing and in the same impact report as the initial annexation in which the contiguity required
by section 31-12-104 (1)(a) is achieved by annexing a platted street or alley, a public or private
right-of-way, a public or private transportation right-of-way or area, or a lake, reservoir, stream,
or other natural or artificial waterway. Impacts of the annexation upon the parcels described in
subparagraph (II) of paragraph (e) of this subsection (1) that abut such platted street or alley,
public or private right-of-way, public or private transportation right-of-way or area, or lake,
reservoir, stream, or other natural or artificial waterway shall be considered in the impact report
required by section 31-12-108.5.
As part of the same hearing, the municipality shall consider and decide upon any petition for
annexation of any parcel of property having an individual schedule number for county tax filing
purposes, which petition was received not later than forty-five days prior to the hearing date,
where the parcel abuts any parcel described in subparagraph (II) of paragraph (e) of this
subsection (1) and where the parcel otherwise satisfies all of the eligibility requirements of
section 31-12-104.
(e.3) In connection with any annexation in which the contiguity required by section 31-12-104
(1)(a) is achieved by annexing a platted street or alley, a public or private right-of-way, a public
or private transportation right-of-way or area, or a lake, reservoir, stream, or other natural or
artificial waterway, upon the latter of ninety days prior to the date of the hearing set pursuant to
section 31-12-108 or upon the filing of the annexation petition, the municipality shall provide, by
regular mail to the owner of any abutting parcel as reflected in the records of the county assessor,
written notice of the annexation and of the landowner’s right to petition for annexation pursuant
to section 31-12-107. Inadvertent failure to provide such notice shall neither create a cause of
action in favor of any landowner nor invalidate any annexation proceeding.
(f) In establishing the boundaries of any area proposed to be annexed, if a portion of a platted
street or alley is annexed, the entire width of said street or alley shall be included within the area
annexed.
(g) Notwithstanding the provisions of paragraph (f) of this subsection (1), a municipality shall
not deny reasonable access to landowners, owner of an easement, or the owner of a franchise
adjoining a platted street or alley which has been annexed by the municipality but is not bounded
on both sides by the municipality.
(h) The execution by any municipality of a power of attorney for real estate located within an
unincorporated area shall not be construed to comply with the election provisions of this article
for purposes of annexing such unincorporated area. Such annexation shall be valid only upon
compliance with the procedures set forth in this article.
Response: None of the limitations to annexation described in C.R.S. 31-12-105 are applicable
to this annexation request.
Exhibit B | Application
71
Aspen Mini Storage Annexation, Initial Zoning, PD 9
Local Annexation Criteria
AACP Compliance
Annexation requests should be reviewed for alignment with the Aspen Area Community Plan
(AACP). Annexation of certain lands could facilitate accomplishment of the plan’s goals,
philosophy, policies, or specific action items.
Response: The current application is to annex the parcel and to zone the property to continue
the existing storage use of the property. Thus, no change is proposed in relationship to the
AACP. At some point in the future, the property is intended to become part of a larger
affordable housing project for local residents. That proposal will need to address AACP goals
and objectives, in particular goals for housing locals.
Urban Growth Boundary
The City of Aspen approved Aspen’s Urban Growth Boundary via adoption of the 2012 AACP.
The UGB identifies the land surrounding Aspen as either appropriate for urban development
(within the UGB) or inappropriate for urban development (outside the UGB). Land within the
UGB is expected to become part of the City’s urbanized area and should be considered
appropriate for annexation.
Land outside the UGB should only be annexed as a method of preserving the non-urban
character of lands surrounding Aspen. The UGB does not necessarily need to be amended unless
the land is intended for an urban level of development. Annexation of land outside the UGB, in
fact, may serve a significant public purpose.
Response: The parcel is located within the Urban Growth Boundary and in an area defined as
“Aspen Business Center and North Forty” in the 2019 Aspen Annexation Plan.
Significant Annexations
Changing the regulatory structure and jurisdiction of significant community facilities, large
developments, and large tracts of vacant land present considerable potential for community
change. These annexation proposals should involve discussion between the Aspen City Council
and the Pitkin County Board of County Commissioners. A joint work session at which various
land use issues are discussed can only benefit the City in it analysis of a significant annexation.
For example: properties entitled by the County and annexed into the City can require complex
administration of development rights, especially when amendments are requested. Discussing the
primary elements of the land use review can simplify administration and provide benefit to the
annexing landowner.
Likewise, certain annexation proposals may present concerns to other governmental and quasi-
governmental agencies with jurisdiction or other interest in the property. As necessary, formal
referral comments or work session-format meetings can be held to identify these concerns.
Response: The proposal is to annex the land and continue the current land use, thus the
annexation does not meet the description of a Significant Annexation.
Exhibit B | Application
72
Aspen Mini Storage Annexation, Initial Zoning, PD 10
Fiscal Impact Analysis.
The City should fully understand the financial implication of assuming additional lands upon
each of its functions. The City Finance Department has modeled fiscal impacts of recent
significant annexations and this information has been critical in determining the appropriateness
of annexation. Certain capital improvements may be necessary as well as additional operation
and service costs. These need to be balanced with additional special fund revenues that are
gained.
Pitkin County voters adopted a 2 percent Countywide sales tax, including a provision distributing
47 percent of the tax proceeds to Pitkin County and 53 percent to the City of Aspen. At some
point, the distribution of countywide sales tax may need to be reconsidered as more service
responsibilities shift to the City.
Response: The current proposal is to annex the land and continue the current land use. The
storage site does not generate property tax revenue since it is owned by the City and requires
very few municipal services that are not already provided by the City or special districts.
Annexing the land will allow for orderly planning of future use of the site in conjunction with
adjacent City parcels. The City will receive ongoing lease revenues from the existing storage
and parking leases, which benefits the future affordable housing project. No fiscal impact
analysis was required for this application.
Once a redevelopment plan is proposed for this and adjacent properties, the costs of new
infrastructure and new services versus revenues can be quantified and reviewed by the City
as part of land use review.
Development Rights/Zoning
Development rights associated with a property in Pitkin County versus those if the property is
annexed into the City of Aspen should be considered. Annexations are typically associated with
a proposal to further develop the property. Traditionally, the City weighs an increase in
development rights in relation to accomplishment towards community goals available through
annexation.
A complete understanding of a property’s development potential, prior to annexation, should
include a zoning build-out analysis considering regulatory limitations, such as growth
management and impact fees, and regulatory incentives, such as the use of Transferable
Development Rights. The public policy of such regulations and the impact of changing the
regulatory structure upon the City should be considered.
Zoning of newly annexed land should approximate development rights prior to annexation,
unless a site-specific development plan is approved concurrent with annexation. The creation of
non-conformities should be avoided, although custom legislation to address special interests can
further complicate the City’s regulatory environment.
The City should encourage the legalization of “bandit units” through the City’s Accessory
Dwelling Unit provisions to ensure compliance with the health and safety standards of Adopted
building codes. These units should be expected in older subdivisions surrounding Aspen.
Exhibit B | Application
73
Aspen Mini Storage Annexation, Initial Zoning, PD 11
Response: The current zoning in Pitkin County is B-2. “The B-2 (General Business) zone district
is intended to provide for the establishment of commercial and low-intensity, non-polluting
industrial uses that do not require or generate high customer traffic volumes and to permit
customary accessory uses, including a small portion of the land area in high density, long-
term residential dwelling units. Because of the need to preserve the existing inventory of B-2
zone district lands for commercial purposes, residential uses are secondary in priority to
commercial uses.” Pitkin County LUC 3-60-10
The proposed City zoning is Service/Commercial/Industrial (SCI) PD. “The S/C/I zone supports
Aspen Area Community Plan policies related to a sustainable, local serving economy and
the preservation of a diversity of commercial opportunities for locals and visitors. In
response to the decreased intensity of commercial uses in the zone and relative distance
from the CC and C1 zones, both multi-modal and automobile parking improvements are
appropriate on site in the S/C/I. In order to enhance the City's commercial diversity, the
zone allows for uses not found in other zones including light industrial, manufacturing,
production, repair and similar service-related uses. The S/C/I zone is designed to provide
commercial space to those uses not appropriate in other commercial zones, but which
provide an essential or unique service to support the local economy. Flexibility and
adaptability are important features of the zone to respond to changing commercial sector
dynamics and meet the space needs of the City's service, creative and production
economies.” Aspen Municipal Code 26.710.160
The SCI PD zoning will restrict land use to the existing uses and allow the existing extent of
use. A Planned Development designation is proposed to limit the development to the
existing buildings. Only regular maintenance and repairs are anticipated at the site. When a
future redevelopment plan is advanced for this and adjacent City property, then a zoning
change is expected.
There are additional considerations for properties in this area that are subject to Pitkin
County’s Land Use Code Section 3-70-50 that were not analyzed since no change in the land
use is proposed in this annexation. However, the table below was prepared to display the
two zone districts.
The dimensional standards of the proposed SCI PD and existing B-2 zone districts are
displayed below:
Exhibit B | Application
74
Aspen Mini Storage Annexation, Initial Zoning, PD 12
Standard Proposed: City of Aspen SCI
PD
Existing: Pitkin County B-2
Lot Size (sf) +/- 129,678 +/- 129,678
Minimum Lot Size (sf) Existing per PD Survey 6,000
Minimum Front Setback Existing per PD Survey 200’
Minimum Rear Setback Existing per PD Survey 10’
Minimum Side Setback Existing per PD Survey 10’
Maximum Height Existing per PD Survey 28’
Floor: Area Ratio Existing per PD Survey 0.36:1
Allowable Floor Area (sf) +/- 27,590 (per PD Survey) 46,684
Proposed Floor Area (sf) 27,590 (per PD Survey) 27,590
Pitkin County Transferable Development Rights
Certain lands in the County within the City’s annexation area are eligible for increased
development rights through the extinguishment of transferable development rights (TDRs).
Certain site-specific approvals granted in Pitkin County may involve or require the use of TDRs.
And, certain development may have already occurred by use of these TDRs necessitating
acknowledgment of the realized increased development right.
Until the City adopts a program for accepting Pitkin County Transferable Development Rights,
each individual annexation request should include an analysis of TDR-contingent land use
scenarios and, if necessary, an agreement should be reached describing the future use of Pitkin
County TDRs within the newly annexed area.
Response: The proposed annexation does not anticipate the use of Pitkin County transferable
development rights. The existing use is expected to continue for some period and the site is
anticipated to transition to affordable housing through a future land use application.
Usefulness and Appropriateness of Each Jurisdiction’s Regulations
As Aspen City limits expand beyond the original townsite, the effects of environmental
constraints and hazards on development increase. Pitkin County’s 1041 regulations address
development on steep slopes, in wildfire hazard areas, in rockfall and avalanche hazard areas,
and within wildlife corridors. The City’s Environmentally Sensitive Area review standards
address flood hazard areas and development above the 8,040-foot elevation.
The County’s regulations primarily attempt to minimize land use intensity and minimize the
infrastructure and operational effects of development. The City’s land use code encourages the
intense use of land and addresses urban development issues, such as architectural character. In
transition areas, the City’s Planned Unit Development regulations should be used to establish an
appropriate balance.
Design standards for public improvements also reflect the rural and urban aspect of each
jurisdiction. The appropriateness of each jurisdiction’s development regulations and design
standards should be considered in each annexation. The acceptance of substandard public
improvements and potential public costs of upgrading those facilities should also be considered.
Exhibit B | Application
75
Aspen Mini Storage Annexation, Initial Zoning, PD 13
The City may require certain facilities be upgraded prior to annexation. Alternatively, the City
may require a cash payment to accommodate expected City capital improvement and operational
expenses.
The City currently has no experience administering remote backcountry and Forest Service
lands. These lands could require significant changes to the City’s emergency services. The public
costs of annexing remote lands should be considered in relation to the public goals of such an
action.
Aspen’s Ski Area Base (SKI) Zone District addresses development at the base of ski areas. The
zoning provides for a mixture of skiing, recreational, commercial, and tourist-oriented uses and
requires adoption of a Planned Unit Development. This zoning was applied to Aspen Highlands
Base Village and may be appropriate for the Buttermilk Ski Area base, upon annexation.
Response: The current storage use is expected to continue in the near term with no
expansion proposed. A Planned Development designation on the property will limit land uses
to the existing structures. Storage is an allowed accessory use in the SCI zone. The PD
designation limits the storage to existing uses while recognizing that the use is more intense
than allowed as a use by right in the zone district.
Ultimately, this parcel and adjacent City-owned parcels will be master planned and permitted
for affordable housing for local workers. The intensity and character of that development will
be an important topic of community input. The City has initiated community outreach about
potential futures for the property and will continue to do so as a master plan is developed
and permitted.
Deer Hill is subject to a conservation easement that was implemented based on findings from
previous affordable housing efforts. The area is within the Urban Growth Boundary and has
urbanized due to previous City and County land use approvals. The area also hosts important
transportation facilities including the Pitkin County Airport, a bus rapid transit station and
bus maintenance facility, and SH 82.
Infrastructure and Ability to Serve
Annexation reviews typically focus a great deal of fiscal analysis on the potential extension of
urban services to annexed territories. Cost, capacity, and engineering issues related extension of
the City’s municipal water system to developing land on the urban fringe is a significant
annexation issue.
Currently, several small water districts serve residences located outside the City’s boundaries but
within the service area of the water system. These small districts may present a problem for the
City as their capital facilities may not be providing acceptable standards of service. Upgrading is
expensive, and may become the responsibility of the City following annexation.
Exhibit B | Application
76
Aspen Mini Storage Annexation, Initial Zoning, PD 14
The County does not currently require new periphery development to join the City’s municipal
water system. However, these county development proposals must be reviewed by the City
Council and found in compliance with the AACP in order to obtain City water service. In these
cases, the City often requires compliance with City development regulations. Property owners
developing a property eligible for annexation should consult the City’s Community Development
Department and consider annexation.
Response: The property is currently served by City municipal water and Aspen Sanitation
District wastewater services. That service is not expected to change due to annexation. In the
future, redevelopment of the site will require expanded utility services. The cost of those
services will be analyzed in conjunction with the master plan for the area.
Simplicity of City Boundary
The City/County boundary has created confusion for citizens and staff responsible for enforcing
public policy. A complex boundary can complicate emergency service provision and, in extreme
cases, defeat efforts of law enforcement officers. Annexations simplifying the boundary should
be encouraged while those further complicating the division should be avoided.
Response: The City/County boundary in the AABC area is not simple and this annexation will
likely make it neither more nor less complex. The area is an interface of municipal and county
uses and users that are not necessarily in the jurisdiction one might predict. Annexing the
mini storage parcel is unlikely to change any existing complexity. The most significant
anomaly appears to be the unincorporated Mountain Rescue parcel, which is surrounded on
three sides by the City. Annexation of Lot 3 of the Communications Center Subdivision does
not create a significant change to that situation. Attachment D displays the vicinity.
Involvement of law enforcement and emergency providers during the future review of a land
use change could reduce potential confusion about service territory. The existing storage use
is a use that does not generate significant demand for emergency services regardless of
jurisdiction.
Exhibit B | Application
77
Aspen Mini Storage Annexation, Initial Zoning, PD 15
City of Aspen Land Use Code- Initial Zoning
Pre-Application Conference Notes- See Attachment H
Fee Agreement- See Attachment F
Compliance with Sec. 26.304.035 Neighborhood Outreach
Response: Outreach to neighbors and the community at-large has been ongoing over the
previous two years regarding the ultimate affordable housing plan and steps needed to
achieve that goal. This annexation and zoning are a logical step toward that future housing
plan but the housing plan will be a separate, future application. The City of Aspen Public
Record includes reports on the affordable housing project outreach that was presented in
public City Council meetings.
In late October, an email update with project information, including this annexation
request, was sent to more than 300 participants in previous project outreach events who
expressed interest in project updates as well as the City’s email list. In addition, a public
outreach event is planned for December 9 to continue outreach regarding project progress,
including the annexation and initial zoning of the property. Individual outreach has also
been employed during the ongoing public outreach to specific stakeholders.
A project website at www.aspenlumberyard.com was used during the previous phase of
work and information is currently being shared at:
https://www.aspencommunityvoice.com/lumberyard.
That site provides information on the overall planning for future housing as well as the
annexation. There are opportunities for feedback as well as information about upcoming
input opportunities and summaries of previous public comments.
Finally, mailed public notice will be sent to property owners in an area far greater than
that required by the land use code. Notice will include residences in the North Forty and
Burlingame neighborhoods, which are outside of the required boundary.
Compliance with Sec. 26.310.080 Rezoning
(a) General Application Information
Response: See Attachments F and G
Exhibit B | Application
78
Aspen Mini Storage Annexation, Initial Zoning, PD 16
(b) Present Zone District and Land Uses
Response: The Lot 3 of the Communications Center Subdivision is currently zoned by
Pitkin County as B-2 (General Business) and it houses a storage facility. The initial
zoning for the property is proposed to be SCI (Service/Commercial/Industrial) Planned
Development to allow the continued operation of the storage facility. No expansion,
change of use or “proposed development” is proposed.
In the future, a plan for affordable housing will be completed and submitted for
consideration and rezoning appropriate for the use proposed will be initiated.
(c) The Area of the Property
Response: The subject property is +/- 129,678 square feet or 2.977 acres.
(d) An Accurate Survey of the Property
Response: See Attachment E
Compliance with Sec. 26.310.090 Zoning Standards of Review
(a) Whether the proposed amendment is compatible with surrounding zone districts and land
uses, considering existing land use and neighborhood characteristics
Response: The proposed amendment will allow the storage operation to continue
while planning and permitting for affordable housing on this and adjacent parcels is
pursued. The property to the south is owned by the City and is zoned SCI. The
property to the north is in the unincorporated county and includes commercial, light
industrial and affordable housing uses. To the east are storage and affordable housing
uses. To the west is Highway 82 and the Pitkin County Airport. That mix of uses is
characteristic of the area. The SCI PD zoning is the most logical zone district given
existing use and the existing City zoning to the south and local serving orientation.
Adjacent City and County zoning are displayed on Attachments I and J.
(b) Whether and the extent to which the proposed amendment would result in demands on
public facilities and whether and the extent to which the proposed amendment would
exceed the capacity of those such public facilities including, but not limited to,
transportation facilities, sewage facilities, water supply, parks, drainage, schools and
emergency medical facilities.
Response: The proposed amendment continues the low impact use tied to the storage
operation. No expansion of the operation is anticipated. In the future, an affordable
housing plan is intended to be proposed and any impacts associated with that use will
need to be considered during review of such proposal.
Exhibit B | Application
79
Aspen Mini Storage Annexation, Initial Zoning, PD 17
(c) Whether and extent to which proposed zoning amendment would result in significantly
adverse impacts on the natural environment.
Response: The proposed rezoning is to continue the existing storage use, no new
impacts to the natural environment are anticipated. Ultimately, an affordable housing
proposal will be proposed for the property that will require a rezoning and any new
impacts may be assessed at that time.
(d) Whether the proposed amendment is consistent and compatible with the community
character in the City and in harmony with the public interest and intent of this Title.
Response: The proposed zoning amendment will not change the existing use of the
property. The property is compatible with nearby light industrial, residential, and
commercial uses as evidenced by years of experience. That mix of uses is consistent
with the character of the area. The zoning proposed is consistent with that mix of
uses, many of which serve City of Aspen residents.
Exhibit B | Application
80
Aspen Mini Storage Annexation, Initial Zoning, PD 18
Planned Development
Compliance with Sec. 26.445.050 Planned Development Review Standards
Response: The proposed use already exists, and no new development is proposed. (a)
The property is within the Aspen Urban Growth Boundary and one of the areas
identified for possible annexation in the Aspen Annexation Plan. The existing use is
consistent with the type of uses in the area. (b) The site is already developed, and no
hazards are present. (c) The site is developed; no additional development is proposed.
(d) The PD dimensional standards to intended to limit development to the existing
uses and buildings/improvements. (e) No new development is proposed. (f) Existing
pedestrian and trail improvements will continue. (g) No new development is
proposed. (h) No new development is proposed. (i) No change to access or circulation
are proposed. A future housing plan is intended to enhance access and circulation in
accord with an approved Highway 82 Access Control Plan, while this annexation
supports that ultimate improvement it is not part of the current application.
Compliance with Sec. 26.445.060 Use Variation Standards
Response: Rather than to vary from standards, the purpose of the Planned
Development is to “freeze” the existing use and structures in place until a future
affordable housing plan is created, approved and ready for development. The storage
use is typically an accessory use in this zone district, but it is the primary use in this
instance. (a) The existing use is to continue an existing use which is consistent with the
mix of storage, light industrial, housing, and commercial uses in the area. (b) No new
development or variation is proposed. (c) No new development or variation is
proposed. (d) The existing use is compatible with the planning for the AABC area,
which includes residential, commercial, light industry and storage uses.
Compliance with Sec. 26.445.080 Application Contents
Response: The contents are largely not applicable since the proposal is to limit an
existing use and series of buildings and spaces to their existing conditions.
(a)(1) See above. (2) A survey is Attachment E. (3) The purpose of the Planned
Development is to limit and allow the uses and buildings to the existing conditions. In
the future, an affordable housing plan will be submitted for review on this and
adjacent parcels. (4) No change is proposed in the architectural character of the site or
the landscaping. (5) Utilities are currently in place and in service. (6) The dimensional
requirements are based on the existing conditions as documented in Attachment E,
Survey/PD Plan. (7)The site is already developed, thus no additional soils, hazard, or
utility studies are warranted. Future housing plans will perform such analysis, as
required.
Exhibit B | Application
81
Aspen Mini Storage Annexation, Initial Zoning, PD 19
(8) The site is already developed and the public infrastructure is in place, no changes
are proposed. (9) See above. (10) The application includes annexation and initial
zoning for the property along with a Planned Development designation to limit uses
and buildings to existing conditions.
(b)(1) See above. (2) See Attachment E. (3) The site is developed and no changes are
proposed. (4) No new development is proposed. (5) No new development is proposed
no new grading or stormwater features are proposed. (6) No new development is
proposed. Attachment E includes transportation and pedestrian improvements that
exist. (7) Not applicable. (8) Not applicable.
(9) No new improvements are proposed, normal maintenance activities will continue
at the expense of the property owner. (10) Not applicable. (11) See above. (12) The
application includes annexation and initial zoning for the property along with a
Planned Development designation to limit uses and buildings to existing conditions.
Compliance with Sec. 26.575.020 Supplemental Regulations- Calculations and Measurements
Response: The dimensional allowances and limitations for Lot 3 of the
Communications Center Subdivision shall be the existing conditions as outlined in the
Improvement Survey attached as Attachment E. The dimensions of the survey shall be
used to create the boundary of the initial zoning map amendment.
Compliance with Sec. 26.710.160 Service/Commercial/Industrial Zone
Response: (a) The existing uses include storage, commercial parking, an on-site
manager housing unit, and an office. These uses are suited to the location and target
service local residents and businesses. (b)(c) The existing uses would be limited or
conditioned through the SCI zoning, the Planned Development overlay limits the uses
and structures to the existing conditions described in Attachment E. The PD
designation would allow continued use until a future housing planning is designed,
approved, and ready for construction. The continued uses include 244 storage spaces
in seven storage buildings (two with basement storage), an office, an on-site manager
residence, and 27 commercial parking spaces. (d) The dimensional requirements are
based on the existing conditions as depicted in Attachment E. No new development is
proposed. (e) Not applicable. (f) Not Applicable. (g) Not applicable.
HOA Compliance Form
Response: Not applicable, the property is not a member of a Homeowners
Association.
Exhibit B | Application
82
Aspen Mini Storage Annexation, Initial Zoning, PD 20
Dimensional Requirements Form
Response: The property is restricted to the dimensional requirements of the existing
conditions, as depicted on Attachment E.
Exhibit B | Application
83
Aspen Mini Storage Annexation, Initial Zoning, PD 21
Schedule of Attachments
A- Deed and Legal Description
B- Title Commitment- Proof of Ownership
C- Annexation Plat
D- Vicinity Map
E- Survey/PD Plan
F- Fee Agreement
G- Land Use Application Form
H- Pre-Application Conference Notes
I- Adjacent County Zoning
J- Adjacent City Zoning
K- Existing Landscaping
L- HOA Compliance Form
Exhibit B | Application
84
PRE-APPLICATION CONFERENCE SUMMARY
DATE: 10/19/21
PLANNER: Ben Anderson, Planner, City of Aspen, 429-2765
PROJECT NAME AND ADDRESS: 105 AABC (Pitkin County), Mini-Storage associated with the Lumberyard Project
PARCEL ID# 273503102003
REPRESENTATIVE: Bob Schultz, Representative for City Asset Department, 963-3670
DESCRIPTION: In 2020, The City of Aspen purchased a nearly 3-acre parcel in the AABC (Aspen Airport Business
Center). This recently acquired property, which is located in unincorporated Pitkin County, but within the Urban
Growth Boundary is anticipated to be combined with other adjacent properties (including the “Lumberyard”
property) in the creation of an affordable housing development. The property currently contains a mini-storage
facility and related uses and structures.
Prior to the future Land Use actions that would grant the full entitlements to the eventual project, an application
related to this PreApp is be limited to pursue: 1) annexation of the property into the City of Aspen, and 2) establish
a “holding” zone that would memorialize the existing development and use of the property until the final plan for
the site is developed and implemented.
It is proposed that the annexation and initial zoning of the property would be carried out through two ordinances.
The annexation process, which is outlined in a step-by-step description in the City of Aspen’s Annexation Plan,
would be handled in the first Ordinance.
The second Ordinance would establish the initial zoning on the property – which is proposed as SCI
(Service/Commercial/Industrial) with a Planned Development Overlay would recognize the current conditions of
the property, memorialize the existing development and use of the property, and limit the use until the eventual
affordable housing project is initiated. This second Ordinance would require a recommendation from COA’s
Planning and Zoning Commission prior to Council review. The Planned Development, as it will be defined and
limited by the existing conditions will be very limited in scope and shall be considered in single review by City
Council (separate reviews for project and detailed review are not necessary). It is anticipated that both Ordinances
will be considered concurrently.
Additional Items to consider:
1) This action – the process and steps, is recommended to be modeled after the 2011 action which
annexed and rezoned the adjacent Lumberyard process
2) The annexation shall be consistent with requirements as specified by the Colorado Revised Statutes
3) Because of the relatively small size of the proposed annexation (< 10 acres), this annexation does not
require the filing of an annexation report with the Pitkin County Board of County Commissioners (BOCC).
However, staff strongly encourages the applicant to reach out to Pitkin County for a letter or other
statement of support for the annexation and zoning actions.
Public Noticing will be required for several public hearings related to the proposed land use actions. Staff requires
that Enhanced Public Information is provided per 26.304.035 and strongly recommends that an Information
Exhibit B | Application
85
Meeting (in person, virtual, etc.) of some form be held to inform neighbors of the relationship of these land use
actions to the anticipated future project.
RELEVANT LAND USE CODE SECTIONS:
Section Number Section Title
26.304 Common Development Review Procedures
26.310 Amendments to the Text and Zone District Map
26.445 Planned Development
26.575.020 Calculations and Measurements
26.710.160 SCI Zone District
CRS 31-12-102…sequence – State Statutes Related to Annexation
See Attachment – City of Aspen’s Annexation Plan
For your convenience – links to the Land Use Application and Land Use Code are below:
Land Use Application Land Use Code
REVIEW BY: Community Development staff for complete application
Planning and Zoning Commission for Recommendation
City Council for Ordinances: Annexation and Planned Development/Rezoning
PUBLIC HEARING: Yes; P&Z and City Council
PLANNING FEES: $7,800 deposit for 24 hours of staff time (Additional/fewer hours billed/refunded at
$325 per hour)
REFERRAL FEES: City Engineering Department - $325; 1 hour deposit – additional hours will be billed as
necessary.
TOTAL DEPOSIT: $8,125
APPLICATION CHECKLIST – PLEASE EMAIL APPLICATION TO: ben.anderson@cityofaspen.com
Completed Land Use Application and signed Fee Agreement.
Pre-application Conference Summary (this document).
Street address and legal description of the parcel on which development is proposed to occur,
consisting of a current (no older than 6 months) certificate from a title insurance company, an
ownership and encumbrance report, or attorney licensed to practice in the State of Colorado, listing
the names of all owners of the property, and all mortgages, judgments, liens, easements, contracts and
agreements affecting the parcel, and demonstrating the owner’s right to apply for the Development
Application. The purpose of this requirement is to show that the Applicant has the authority to apply
for a Land Use Case.
A written description of the proposal and an explanation in written, graphic, or model form of how the
proposed development complies with the review standards relevant to the development application
and relevant land use approvals associated with the property. This should include responses to
Statutory and Local Annexation Criteria – as identified in COA’s Annexation Plan
An annexation plat/map
Draft of annexation petition
Exhibit B | Application
86
A site improvement survey (no older than a year from submittal) including topography, existing
structures, and vegetation showing the current status of the parcel certified by a registered land
surveyor by licensed in the State of Colorado. The survey and related information should document
the existing structures (floor plans, floor area and other dimensions) and uses on the property. While
an annexation report is not required, due to the size of the parcel, the survey could be a mechanism
to provide information that would typically be in the annexation report, as applicable.
HOA Compliance form (Attached to Application)
Once the copy is deemed complete by staff, the following items will then need to be submitted:
Total fee for review of the application.
Disclaimer:
The foregoing summary is advisory in nature only and is not binding on the City. The summary is based on
current zoning, which is subject to change in the future, and upon factual representations that may or may not
be accurate. The summary does not create a legal or vested right.
Exhibit B | Application
87
Exhibit B | Application
88
GMETAL LEAN-TO LUMBERSTORAGE BUILDING322.3'S320.7'24.2'EDGE OF PAVEMENTEEDYHINLET7775.23INLET7775.39GRAVEL PARKING - STORAGE AREAROCK WALL
180.7'180.7'20.4'
20.4'INLET7771.24INLET7772.75INLET7771.14METAL STORAGE BUILDINGMETAL STORAGE BUIL
D
I
N
G METAL STORAGE BUILDING25.0'30.0'30.0'20.0'INLET7771.2225.0'30.0'30.0'20.0'15.5'(TIE)BUILDING20.0'5.0'25.0'60.6'
97.8'
35.0'
105.7'
105.7'
105.7'
105.7'
105.7'
105.7'
135.7'
135.7'185.7'185.7'20.0'
20.0'
EDGE OF PAVEMENT
METAL STORAGE BUIL
D
I
N
G
METAL STORAGE BUILD
I
N
G
METAL STORAGE BUILD
I
N
G
METAL STORAGE BUILD
I
N
G
105 WOODWARD LANE
2.0' WITNESS CORNERSET #5 REBAR & 1-1/4"BLUE PLASTIC CAP WCTNC PLS38215FOUND #5 REBAR &1-1/4" YELLOW PLASTICCAP LS16129ROCK RETAININGSITE BENCH MARKFOUND #5 REBAR & 1-1/4" YELLOWPLASTIC CAP HCE LS19598ELEVATION: 7775.13FOUND #4REBAR &1" REDPLASTIC CAP ILLEGIBLEFOUND #5REBAR & 1-1/2"ALUMINUMCAP LS31551FOUND #5REBAR & 1-1/4"YELLOW PLASTICCAP LS23875PAVED ROADWAY
PAVED DRIVE
PAVED DRIVE2'± ELEVATION DROPBETWEEN CONCRETE &PAVEMENTALONG THIS LINE4' WIDE CONCRETE DRAINAGE PAN
9.7' WITNESS CORNERFOUND #5 REBAR & 2"ALUMINUM CAP LS238759.7'(TIE)CONCRETE RETAINING WALLLOT 2COMMUNICATIONS CENTERSUBDIVISIONLOT 1COMMUNICATIONS CENTERSUBDIVISIONLOT 3QWEST/CITY OF ASPENSUBDIVISION EXEMPTIONLOT LINE ADJUSTMENTPAVED PATH AMERICANROADWOODWARD LANECOLORADOSTATEHIGHWAYNO. 82NORTH BOUND LANE - PAVED ROADWAY GREENBELT AREAPLAT BOOK 7PAGE 7920' UTILITY EASEMENTPLAT BOOK 21 PAGE 3420' UTILITY EASEMENTPLAT BOOK 21 PAGE 34 30' ROAD EASEMENTPLAT BOOK 21 PAGE 3415' ACCESS EASEMENTPLAT BOOK 21 PAGE 34LOT 3COMMUNICATIONS CENTERSUBDIVISION2.977± ACRES77797
7
7
8 77727773777577807785779077807785778577857783 7780778077807778 77777780 77757777777577757774 PAVED ROADWAYN84°34'00"E 201.89'PLAT=201.92'R=2160.00'L=182.99'CB=S10°29'43"WCH=182.93'PLAT=S10°32'21"W 182.94'PLAT=N84°34'00"E 229.50'N84°37'50"E 229.84'S06°41'33"E 216.3
5
'
PLAT=S06°38'00"E
2
1
6
.
1
7
'S84°37'22"W 435.05'PLAT=S84°34'00"WR=1960.00'L=399.42'CB=N07°57'33"WCH=398.73'PLAT=N07°54'08"W 398.70'PLAT=L=399.39'COVENANTNO BUILDINGS ORIMPROVEMENTSPLAT BOOK 17 PAGE 52BASIS OF BEARINGS20' HOLY CROSS OVERHEADELECTRIC EASEMENTBOOK 419 PAGE 807BOOK 582 PAGE 22710' HOLY CROSSUNDERGROUNDELECTRIC EASEMENTBOOK 661 PAGE 82210' U.S. WESTCOMMUNICATIONSTELEPHONE EASEMENTRECEPTION NO. 40134010' ELECTRIC EASEMENTPLAT BOOK 21 PAGE 34BOOK 291 PAGE 64715' CABLE T.V. EASEMENTPLAT BOOK 21 PAGE 34AND15' WIDE BICYCLE TRAILEASEMENTBOOK 345 PAGE 97510' UTILITY EASEMENTPLAT BOOK 21 PAGE 34BOOK 291 PAGE 647PERMANENT EASEMENT FORCONSTRUCTION, MAINTENANCEOF ROADWAY, UTILITIES,DRAINAGE & BIKE PATHTO CDOTRECEPTION 446652(VARIABLE WIDTH)NOTES:5. THIS SITE PLAN DOES NOT CONSTITUTE A TITLE SEARCH BY TRUE NORTH COLORADO, LLC FOR ALL INFORMATION REGARDINGEASEMENT, RIGHTS-OF-WAY AND/OR TITLE OF RECORD, TRUE NORTH COLORADO, LLC. RELIED UPON TITLE COMMITMENT CASENO. PCT25456W ISSUED BY PITKIN COUNTY TITLE INC, EFFECTIVE DATE: SEPTEMBER 26, 20196. ELEVATIONS SHOWN HEREON ARE BASED ON NORTH AMERICAN VERTICAL DATUM OF 1988 (NAVD 88)REFERENCED FROM NATIONAL GEODETIC SURVEY (NGS) STATION S 159 HAVING AN ELEVATION OF 7720.88.7. CONTOUR INTERVAL EQUALS 1 FOOT.8. UNDERGROUND UTILITIES SHOWN HEREON WERE LOCATED BY ROARING FORK UTILITY LOCATORS LLC. SANITARYSEWER LINES WERE PROVIDED BY ASPEN CONSOLIDATED SANITATION DISTRICT. UTILITIES SHOWN HEREON AREFOR PLANNING PURPOSES ONLY. PLEASE CALL 811 PRIOR TO ANY DIGGING OR EARTHWORK CONSTRUCTIONFOR UTILITY VERIFICATION.LOT 3 COMMUNICATIONS CENTER SUBDIVISION SECTION 3, TOWNSHIP 10 SOUTH, RANGE 85 WEST OF THE 6TH PMCOUNTY OF PITKIN, STATE OF COLORADOPD SITE PLANCATV PEDESTALDPOWER POLEGUY ANCHORSIGNSTORM DRAIN MANHOLEELECTRIC MANHOLEEWATER METERIRRIGATION VALVE BOXWIVBDRAINAGE INLETWATER LINESEWER LINETELEPHONE LINEFIBER OPTIC LINEGAS LINEOVERHEAD ELECTRIC LINE CATV LINEELECTRIC LINE TELEPHONE PEDESTALDYHSFIRE HYDRANTSANITARY MANHOLEELECTRICAL TRANSFORMERGAS METERELECTRICAL METERGLEGENDE30'15'60'SCALE: 1" = 30'N0CLEAN-OUTWATER VALVE BOXCDOT COMMUNICATION VAULTBOLLARDCHAIN-LINK FENCEWOOD FENCEA LAND SURVEYING AND MAPPING COMPANYP.O. BOX 614 - 386 MAIN STREET UNIT 3NEW CASTLE, COLORADO 81647(970) 984-0474www.truenorthcolorado.comDRAWNLDVSURVEYEDDJBSHEET1 OF 1TRUENORTHA LAND SURVEYING AND MAPPING COMPANYNOTICE: ACCORDING TO COLORADO LAW YOU MUST COMMENCE ANYLEGAL ACTION BASED UPON ANY DEFECT IN THIS SURVEY WITHIN THREEYEARS AFTER YOU FIRST DISCOVER SUCH DEFECT. IN NO EVENT MAY ANYACTION BASED UPON ANY DEFECT IN THIS SURVEY BE COMMENCED MORETHAN TEN YEARS FROM THE DATE OF CERTIFICATION SHOWN HEREON.VICINITY MAPSITESURVEYOR'S STATEMENTI, RODNEY P. KISER, DO HEREBY STATE THAT THIS SITE PLAN IS BASED ON A FIELD SURVEY IN SEPTEMBER OF 2020AND WAS PREPARED BY ME AND UNDER MY SUPERVISION AND RESPONSIBLE CHARGE AND THAT IT IS TRUE ANDCORRECT TO THE BEST OF MY BELIEF AND KNOWLEDGE.PROJECT NO: 2021-372DATE:October 22, 2021PROPERTY DESCRIPTION:Exhibit B | Application89
Page 1 of 3
Ordinance XX, Series of 2022
Aspen Mini-Storage Annexation
ORDINANCE NO. XX
SERIES OF 2022
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF CITY OF ASPEN, COLORADO
APPROVING THE ANNEXATION OF CERTAIN TERRITORY TO THE CITY OF
ASPEN, COLORADO, COMMONLY KNOWN AS THE ASPEN MINI-STORAGE
PROPERTY, 105 AABC, ASPEN, COLORADO, 81611 AND LEGALLY DESCRIBED AS:
LOT 3, COMMUNICATIONS SUBDIVISION, ACCORDING TO THE PLAT THEREOF
RECORDED OCTOBER 3, 1988, IN PLAT BOOK 21 AT PAGE 34.
PARCEL ID: 273503102003
WHEREAS, on November 23, 2022 the City Manager on behalf of the City of Aspen, the
owner of the property proposed to be annexed, did file with the City Clerk of the City of Aspen a
Petition for Annexation of territory to the City of Aspen; and
WHEREAS, the petition, including accompanying copies of an annexation map, has been
reviewed by the City Attorney's Office and the City Engineer and found by them to contain the
information prescribed and set forth in §31-12-107, C.R.S.; and
WHEREAS, the City Council, by resolution (Number 14, Series of 2022) at its regular
meeting on January 25, 2022 did find and determine said Petition for Annexation to be in
substantial compliance with the provisions of §31-12-107, C.R.S.; and
WHEREAS, the City Council, by resolution (Number XX, Series of 2022) at its regular
meeting on March 8, 2022, did find and determine, following a public hearing, said Petition for
Annexation to be in substantial compliance with§§ 31-12-104 and 31-12-105, C.R.S.; and
WHEREAS, the Planning and Zoning Commission reviewed and considered the
proposed annexation under the applicable review criteria of the City of Aspen’s adopted
Annexation Plan, has reviewed and considered the recommendation of the Community
Development Director, and has taken and considered public comment; and,
WHEREAS, during a duly noticed public hearing on March 1, 2022, the Planning and
Zoning Commission approved Resolution No. XX, Series of 2022, by a X to X vote,
recommending approval of the annexation; and,
WHEREAS, the City Council has reviewed to proposed annexation through the City of
Aspen’s Adopted Annexation Plan and the related review criteria, and have considered
recommendations from the Planning and Zoning Commission and the Community Development
Director; and
WHEREAS, the City Council does hereby find and determine that approval of the
annexation of said territory to be in the City's best interest;
90
Page 2 of 3
Ordinance XX, Series of 2022
Aspen Mini-Storage Annexation
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
ASPEN, COLORADO:
Section 1.
That the tract of land described in the Petition for Annexation, commonly referred to as the "Aspen
Mini-Storage” property, and as shown on the annexation map, is hereby annexed to the City of
Aspen, Colorado.
Section 2.
The City Clerk of the City of Aspen is hereby directed as follows:
a. to file one copy of the annexation map with the original of the annexation ordinance in the
office of the City Clerk of the City of Aspen.
b. To certify and file two copies of the annexation ordinance and of the annexation map with
the Clerk and Recorder of the County of Pitkin, State of Colorado.
c. To request the Clerk and Recorder of Pitkin County to file one certified copy of this annexation
ordinance and of the annexation map with the Division of Local Government of the
Department of Local Affairs, State of Colorado.
Section 3.
The City Engineer of the City of Aspen is hereby directed to amend the Official Map of the
City of Aspen to reflect the boundary changes adopted pursuant to this annexation ordinance.
Section 4.
That if any section, subsection, sentence, clause, phrase or portion of this ordinance is for any
reason held invalid or unconstitutional in a court of competent jurisdiction, such portion shall
be deemed a separate, distinct and independent provision and shall not affect the validity of
the remaining portions thereof.
Section 5.
That this ordinance shall not have any effect on existing litigation and shall not operate as an
abatement of any action or proceeding now pending under or by virtue of the ordinances amended
as herein provided, and the same shall be construed and concluded under such prior ordinances.
A public hearing on the ordinance shall be held on 12th day April, 2022, in the City Council
Chambers, Aspen City Hall, Aspen, Colorado.
INTRODUCED, READ AND ORDERED PUBLISHED as provided by law BY THE City
Council of the City of Aspen on the 22nd day of March, 2022.
_________________________________
Torre, Mayor
91
Page 3 of 3
Ordinance XX, Series of 2022
Aspen Mini-Storage Annexation
ATTEST:
__________________________________
Nicole Henning, City Clerk
FINALLY ADOPTED, PASSED AND APPROVED this 12th day of April, 2022.
___________________________________
Torre, Mayor
APPROVED TO FORM: ___________________________________
James R. True, City Attorney
ATTEST: __________________________________
Nicole Henning, City Clerk
EXHIBIT A – Annexation Map
92
Page 1 of 3
Ordinance XX, Series of 2022
Aspen Mini-Storage Zoning
ORDINANCE NO. XX
SERIES OF 2022
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF ASPEN CITY COUNCIL ESTABLISHING THE
INITIAL ZONING TO AN ANNEXED PROPERTY TO THE SERVICE COMMERCIAL
INDUSTRIAL ZONE DISTRICT AND APPROVING A FINAL PLANNED
DEVELOPMENT PLAN FOR THE PROPERTY COMMONLY KNOWN AS THE
ASPEN MINI-STORAGE PROPERTY, 105 WOODWARD LANE, ASPEN,
COLORADO, 81611 AND LEGALLY DESCRIBED AS: LOT 3, COMMUNICATIONS
SUBDIVISION, ACCORDING TO THE PLAT THEREOF RECORDED OCTOBER 3,
1988, IN PLAT BOOK 21 AT PAGE 34.
PARCEL ID: 273503102003
WHEREAS, the Community Development Department received an application from the
City of Aspen, represented by City Manager Steve Barwick, requesting approval of an
Amendment to the Zone District Map and a final Planned Unit Development (PUD), for the
property at 38005 State Highway 82, commonly known as the BMC West property, and legally
described as Lots 1 and 2, Block 1, Aspen Airport Business Center, Pitkin County, Colorado;
and,
WHEREAS, the property is located at 105 Woodward Lane in the Aspen Airport
Business Center, and is zoned B2 (General Business) in Pitkin County; and,
WHEREAS, the Applicant requested and received annexation into the City of Aspen and
the City has a requirement to designate zoning for the property; and,
WHEREAS, upon review of the application and the applicable code standards, the
Community Development Department found that the application meets or exceeds applicable
standards of review and recommended the property be zoned into the Service Commercial
Industrial Zone District with a Planned Unit Development overlay (SCI-PUD); and,
WHEREAS, the Planning and Zoning Commission reviewed and considered the
proposal under the applicable provisions of the Municipal Code, has reviewed and considered the
recommendation of the Community Development Director, and has taken and considered public
comment; and,
WHEREAS, during a duly noticed public hearing on March 1, 2022, the Planning and
Zoning Commission approved Resolution No. XX, Series of 2022, by a X to X vote,
recommending approval of an Amendment to the Zone District Map, initially zoning the
property as Service Commercial Industrial with Planned Development overlay (SCI-PD), and
recommending the Aspen City Council approve a Final PD plan reflecting existing dimensions;
and,
93
Page 2 of 3
Ordinance XX, Series of 2022
Aspen Mini-Storage Zoning
WHEREAS, The Aspen City Council reviewed and considered the proposal under the
applicable provisions of the Municipal Code, has reviewed and considered the recommendations
of the Community Development Director and the Planning and Zoning Commission, and has
taken and considered public comment; and,
WHEREAS, during a duly noticed public hearing on April 12, 2022, the Aspen City
Council approved an Amendment to the Zone District Map, initially zoning the property as
Service Commercial Industrial with Planned Unit development overlay (SCI-PD), and approved
a Final PD plan reflecting existing dimensions; and,
WHEREAS, the City Council finds that the proposal meets or exceeds all applicable
standards and that assigning the subject property to the SCI-PD Zone District is consistent with
the goals and elements of the Aspen Area Community Plan; and,
WHEREAS, the City Council finds that this Ordinance furthers and is necessary for the
promotion of public health, safety, and welfare.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
ASPEN, COLORADO, THAT:
Section 1: Initial Zoning to SCI-PD
Pursuant to the procedures and standards set forth in City of Aspen Land Use Code Section 26.310,
Amendments to the Land Use Code and Official Zone District Map, The Official Zone District
Map of the City of Aspen shall be amended by the Community Development Director to reflect
Lot 3, Communications Subdivision, also known as the Aspen Mini-Storage, of as included in the
Service Commercial Industrial Zone District with a Planned Development overlay (SCI-PD). The
Community Development Director shall use the survey descriptions contained in the PD Site Plan
of October 22, 2021, attached as Exhibit A, as the basis for determining the zoning boundaries.
Section 2: Approved PD Dimensions and Uses
The dimensional allowances and limitations for Lot 3, Communications Subdivision, also known
as the Aspen Mini-Storage, shall be the existing conditions as outlined in the PD Site Plan of
October 22, 2021, attached as Exhibit A. The use of the property as a mini-storage facility that
contains a caretaker dwelling unit is approved by this PD.
Section 3.
This Ordinance shall not affect any existing litigation and shall not operate as an abatement of any
action or proceeding now pending under or by virtue of the ordinances repealed or amended as
herein provided, and the same shall be conducted and concluded under such prior ordinances.
Section 4.
If any section, subsection, sentence, clause, phrase, or portion of this Ordinance is for any reason
held invalid or unconstitutional in a court of competent jurisdiction, such portion shall be deemed
a separate, distinct, and independent provision and shall not affect the validity of the remaining
portions thereof.
94
Page 3 of 3
Ordinance XX, Series of 2022
Aspen Mini-Storage Zoning
Section 5.
The City Clerk is directed, upon the adoption of this Ordinance, to record a copy of this Ordinance
in the office of the Pitkin County Clerk and Recorder.
Section 6.
A public hearing on the Ordinance was held on the 12th day of April 2022, at 5:00 p.m. in the City
Council Chambers, Aspen City Hall, Aspen Colorado, fifteen (15) days prior to which hearing a
public notice of the same was published in a newspaper of general circulation within the City of
Aspen.
Section 7.
This ordinance shall become effective thirty (30) days following final adoption.
INTRODUCED, READ AND ORDERED PUBLISHED as provided by law by the City Council
of the City of Aspen on the 22nd day of March, 2022.
_________________________________
Torre, Mayor
ATTEST:
__________________________________
Nicole Henning, City Clerk
FINALLY ADOPTED, PASSED AND APPROVED this 12th day of April, 2022.
___________________________________
Torre, Mayor
APPROVED TO FORM: ___________________________________
James R. True, City Attorney
ATTEST: __________________________________
Nicole Henning, City Clerk
EXHIBIT A : PD Site Plan
95
96
97
427 Rio Grande Place, Aspen, CO 81611
p: (970) 920.5090; website: aspen.gov
1
NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING
RE: Annexation and Rezoning – Aspen Mini-Storage Property
Public Hearing: Tuesday March 1, 2022; 4:30PM
Meeting Location: Virtual Meeting via WebEx planned. In the alternative, the
meeting will be held at City Hall, City Council Chambers, 427
Rio Grande Place, Aspen, CO 81611. Please visit
https://cityofaspen.com/1225/Current-City-Webcast-
Meetings-Agendas for final determination of meeting format
and instructions for participation on February 25, 2022.
Project Location: Aspen Mini-Storage Property, 105 AABC, Aspen CO, 81611
Legal Description: Lot 3 of the Communications Center
Subdivision, according to the Plat thereof recorded in Plat
Book 21 at Page 34. Parcel ID# 273503102003
Description: Aspen’s Planning and Zoning Commission will consider a
recommendation related to the Annexation and Zoning of the
Aspen Mini-Storage property. The property is owned by the
City of Aspen and is intended for the eventual inclusion in the
Lumberyard affordable housing project.
Land Use Reviews: The recommendation will provide direction from the Planning
and Zoning Commission to Aspen City Council as they
consider approval of the Annexation and Zoning of the
property.
Decision Making Body: City of Aspen Planning and Zoning Commission
Applicant: City of Aspen, 427 Rio Grande Place, Aspen, CO 81611
More Information: For further information related to the project, contact Ben
Anderson at the City of Aspen Community Development
Department, 427 Rio Grande Place, Aspen, CO, 81611.
970.429.2765, ben.anderson@aspen.gov.
98
Frequently Asked Questions
Aspen Mini-Storage Annexation
Where is Aspen Mini-Storage?
The property is between the Aspen
Lumberyard (ProBuild Aspen) and the
Aspen Airport Business Center along
Highway 82. The property is adjacent to
but is currently outside of City limits. The
property is almost 3 acres and houses
storage units and commercial parking
spaces. A new storage facility was recently
constructed adjacent (east) to the
property which is not part of this proposal.
Who owns the property?
The City of Aspen purchased the property
and is currently operating the mini-storage
facility. The City acquired the site along
with other adjacent property for a future
affordable housing project.
Why is the City annexing the property?t
The City is assembling land to plan the affordable housing project. The other properties planned for
housing- the lumberyard and a triangle of land at the base of Deer Hill just upvalley of the
lumberyard- are already annexed into the City.
Will land use change because of the annexation?
The City is proposing to annex the land and zone it to allow the existing mini-storage use to
continue, no land use change is proposed. This is the same process the City used when it acquired
the lumberyard property. When planning for the housing is complete, then a land use application
will be submitted and go through the public review process.
How can I learn more?
Updates about the annexation, an upcoming subdivision of the triangle parcel and ongoing
planning efforts for future housing can be found at:
https://www.aspencommunityvoice.com/lumberyard
When will there be meetings about this?
The proposed annexation will be considered by the Aspen Planning and Zoning Commission on
March 1. Aspen City Council will hold a statutory hearing on March 8, and a First Reading of the
proposed annexation on March 22. Please see
https://cityofaspen.com/1225/Current-City-Webcast-Meetings-Agendas
for meeting materials a few days before Council meetings or for a link to view the meeting live or
afterwards.
A hearing for the Second Reading is scheduled for April 12.
Mini-Storage Parcel
To downtown Aspen
Pitkin
County
Airport
AABC
Starwood
99
SAMS CAROL A
GRAND JUNCTION, CO 815068636
2662A SUMMER CREST CT
KOPS JILLIAN
ASPEN, CO 81612
PO BOX 1827
ANTOS JAKUB ROBERT
ASPEN, CO 81611
473 PAEPCKE DR #202
PITKIN PARK PLACE PHASE II
ASPEN, CO 81611
COMMON AREA
PACIFIC AVE
FRAZIER DEAN
ASPEN, CO 81611
360 PAEPCKE DR #103
RAMEY JAMIE
ASPEN, CO 81611
99 MINING STOCK PARKWAY #101
VENRICK KEITH MARTIN
ASPEN, CO 81611
417D AABC
LANDIS WILLIAM C & MINDY A
ASPEN, CO 81611
45 NARROW WAY
MCBRIDE KATHERINE HAWLEY
ASPEN, CO 81611
303 AABC #E
JOHNSON ROBERT J & MARIA C
ASPEN, CO 816116112
67 MOLLY CT #101
WESSLER MICHAEL L
ASPEN, CO 81611
34 TUMBLEDOWN LN
MALDAIKYTE LINA
ASPEN, CO 81611
440 PAEPCKE DR #201
NERBONNE ARTHUR R
ASPEN, CO 81611
620 PASS GO LN
LIRIANO ALBERTO JOSE VILLA
ASPEN, CO 816116135
275 PAEPCKE DR # 202
HANSON NATHAN O
ASPEN, CO 81612
PO BOX 826
CITY OF ASPEN
ASPEN, CO 81611
130 S GALENA ST
KISTNER ELIZABETH M & JOSEPH A
ASPEN, CO 81611
0019 LINDVIG CT #204
MONRONEY MICHAEL
ASPEN, CO 81611
720 PASS GO LN
ABCDOG LLC
ASPEN, CO 81611
715 E HYMAN AVE #7
THERIOT JAMES R & SUSAN K
ASPEN, CO 81611-1006
132 TOTTERDOWN RD
TCI OF NORTH NEW JERSEY INC
PHILADELPHIA, PA 19103
ONE COMCAST CENTER 32ND FL
LANTER JANE E
ASPEN, CO 81611
442 PAEPCKE DR # 102
DELAY JOHN P
ASPEN, CO 81611
420 PASS GO LN
OSBERGER MADELEINE
ASPEN, CO 816116116
83 FORGE RD
THOMPSON TIM & MARYIA
ASPEN, CO 81611
440 PAEPCKE DR #203
PACIFIC AVE CONDO ASSOC
ASPEN, CO 81611
412 AABC
CENTOFANTI STEPHEN F
ASPEN, CO 81611
124 FORGE RD #102
RONDEAU SAMUEL
ASPEN, CO 81611
412 AABC #A
GANZ JOSHUA A
ASPEN, CO 81611
415 AABC UNIT H
ASPEN SCHOOL DISTRICT #1
ASPEN, CO 81611
0235 HIGH SCHOOL RD
100
SHERMAN DANIEL M & CANDACE E
ASPEN, CO 81611
143 RIVERDOWN DR
WALKIEWICZ LAUREN L
ASPEN, CO 81611
411 PASS GO LN #411
CHULUUN MISHEEL
ASPEN, CO 81611
410 PAEPCKE DR #101
PHILLIPS CRYSTAL
ASPEN, CO 81611
0129 MINING STOCK PKWY #203
TS BAR X LLC
ASPEN, CO 81611
625 E HYMAN #201
BODA ANITA
ASPEN, CO 81611
163 FORGE RD #104
MOE JAKOB B & GENNA L
ASPEN, CO 81611
124 FORGE RD #101
HERTZ CORPORATION
ESTERO, FL 33928
8501 WILLIAMS RD
TRISH TERRY L & PEGGY JO
ASPEN, CO 81611
64 RIVERDOWN
AZARCON LEE
ASPEN, CO 81612
PO BOX 102
BARKER JOHN CANNON
ASPEN, CO 81611
313 AABC #102
HENDERSON CHRISTOPHER A & ELAINE K
ASPEN, CO 81611
0124 FORGE RD # 104
BARNES CRAIG A
ASPEN, CO 81612
PO BOX 9993
PERL ASHLEY C & DANIEL R
ASPEN, CO 81611
273 PAEPCKE DR #101
GIAMPAOLO JOSEPH F JR
ASPEN, CO 81612
PO BOX 7871
RITTER TIMOTHY J
ASPEN, CO 81611
99 MINING STOCK PKWY #102
ASPEN SCHOOL DISTRICT #1
ASPEN, CO 81611
0235 HIGH SCHOOL RD
POOL AARON
ASPEN, CO 81611
442 PAEPCKE DR #202
ABCDOG LLC
ASPEN, CO 81611
715 E HYMAN AVE #7
LATHAM RYAN
ASPEN, CO 81611
320 PASS GO LN
FRONT AND CENTER LLC
ASPEN, CO 816113304
372 GLEN EAGLES RD
PROBUILD COMPANY LLC
HOUSTON, TX 770568169
PO BOX 460169
SCHLADERER ADRIENNE
ASPEN, CO 81611
0044 CALLAHAN CT #101
LEE JOEL D
ASPEN, CO 81611
722 PASS GO LN #722
JEDEDIAHS CORP
JACKSON, WY 83001
PO BOX 3857
DURSO STEVEN
ASPEN, CO 816116113
170 FORGE RD #106
TAFFARELLI GABRIEL & CAROLINA L
ASPEN, CO 81612
PO BOX 10096
MOUNTAIN RESCUE ASPEN INC
ASPEN, CO 816112501
37925 HWY 82
ASPEN SCHOOL DISTRICT #1
ASPEN, CO 81611
0235 HIGH SCHOOL RD
DANIELS ZUZANA
ASPEN, CO 81611
275 PAEPCKE DR #301
101
ASPEN LOFT LLC
ASPEN, CO 81611
323 WEST MAIN ST #301
AABC ROWHOUSE SUB
ASPEN, CO 81611
319 AABC
CUMMINS RICHARD
ASPEN, CO 816111619
617 W MAIN ST #B
MCCARTNEY CHARLES H
ASPEN, CO 81611
421 G AABC
FOX PRESTON & MICHELLE
ASPEN, CO 816111064
37 NARROW WY
BURLINGAME RANCH II CONDO ASSOC
ASPEN, CO 81612
PO BOX 3149
TULLAR MICHAEL & JENNIFER
ASPEN, CO 81611
27 RIVERDOWN DR
CITY OF ASPEN
ASPEN, CO 81611
130 S GALENA ST
GAROFALO ANNA
ASPEN, CO 81611
55 MINING STOCK PKWY #202
FARRELL RYAN & STEPHANIE
ASPEN, CO 81611
410 PAEPCKE DR #301
HOSTETLER RUTH
ASPEN, CO 81612
PO BOX 2641
ANNIE MITCHELL HOMESTEAD HOA
ASPEN, CO 81612
PO BOX 3149
NIMS GRACE & THOMAS
ASPEN, CO 81611
0099 MINING STOCK PKWY #204
JONES PAUL
WOODY CREEK, CO 81656
PO BOX 74
BRIDGES DARREN
ASPEN, CO 81611
335 PAEPCKE DR #102
STANBERRY DANIEL L
ASPEN, CO 81611
319 AABC # S
REISCHE ERIC
ASPEN, CO 81611
611 PASS GO LN
PITKIN COUNTY
ASPEN, CO 81611
530 E MAIN ST #301
HUCKS AMANDA
TOPANGA, CA 90290-3552
20981 WAVEVIEW DR
GREEN SAM H
ASPEN, CO 81611
0042 MINING STOCK PKWY #106
HEMPHILL ARLAN
ASPEN, CO 81612
PO BOX 205
MARX NICOLE E
ASPEN, CO 81611
320 PASS GO LN
GALAMBOS JOHN P & ROBIN L
ASPEN, CO 81611-1068
70 RIVERDOWN DR
COHEN LAURIE M & FRANCIS DAVID I
ASPEN, CO 81611
124 FORGE RD #106
CHIMERAKIS NICHOLAS & JESSICA
ASPEN, CO 81611
221 FORGE RD
BRUICE DONNA
ASPEN, CO 81611
50 TOTTERDOWN RD
MAROON CREEK APT LP
ASPEN, CO 81611
10 CLUB CIR
ML COACH ROAD ASPEN OWNER LLC
LOS ANGELES, CA 90025
12121 WILSHIRE BLVD #801
SCHMIDT EDWARD C
ASPEN, CO 81611
275 PAEPCKE DR #102
DEER HILL COMM CONDO OWNERS LLC
ASPEN, CO 81611
210 AABC #AA
102
BURLINGAME RANCH I CONDO ASSOC
ASPEN, CO 81611
0042 MINING STOCK PKWY #102
VOLLMER ALYSE
ASPEN, CO 81611
360 PAEPCKE DR #104
MCBRIDE JOHN P
ASPEN, CO 81612
PO BOX 10493
QUIGLEY LAURA & JOSEPH
ASPEN, CO 81611
440 PAEPCKE DR #202
YANG MICHAEL & KATHRYN
ASPEN, CO 81611
95 FORGE RD
MORGAN LUCINDA P
ASPEN, CO 81611
65 TUMBLEDOWN LN
SOLDNER FAMILY LP LLLP
ASPEN, CO 81612
PO BOX 90
BUETTOW ANNA
ASPEN, CO 81611
442 PAEPCKE DR #202
CITY OF ASPEN
ASPEN, CO 81611
130 S GALENA ST
ROJAS PAMELA ULLOA
ASPEN, CO 81611
410 PAEPCKE DR #302
PITKIN COUNTY
ASPEN, CO 81611
530 E MAIN ST #301
TUNTE MICHAEL
ASPEN, CO 81611
473 PAEPCKE DR #201
PITKIN COUNTY
ASPEN, CO 81611
530 E MAIN ST #301
ASPEN SCHOOL DISTRICT #1
ASPEN, CO 81611
0235 HIGH SCHOOL RD
MCBRIDE KATHERINE HAWLEY
ASPEN, CO 81611
303 AABC #E
BURLINGAME RANCH I CONDO ASSOC
ASPEN, CO 81611
0042 MINING STOCK PKWY #102
HEINTZ ERIN N & TODD M
ASPEN, CO 81611
34 MOLLY CT #102
TWO STAGE ROAD LLC
DURHAM , NC 27701
400 W MAIN ST STE 100
DELANEY KELLY
ASPEN, CO 81612
PO BOX 9587
SWENSON JUSTIN & LAURA
ASPEN, CO 81611
412 PACIFIC AVE #H
RIDINGS CHRIS S & MARY T
ASPEN, CO 81611-1087
44 TUMBLEDOWN LN
MCBRIDE JOHN PAUL JR
SANTA BARBARA, CA 93150
PO BOX 5085
FRENCH JOHN R & BARBARA F
ASPEN, CO 81611
0113 RIVERDOWN DR
BAER JESSICA TERESA
ASPEN, CO 81611
185 FORGE RD #102
GLAH SUSAN A
ASPEN, CO 81611
34 TUMBLEDOWN LN
LEWIN ANTHONY & ERIN
ASPEN, CO 81611
319 AABC #11W & X
HOULIHAN SARA B
ASPEN, CO 81611
110 PASS GO LN
PITKIN COUNTY
ASPEN, CO 81611
530 E MAIN ST #301
BROWN DEREK & JENNIFER
ASPEN, CO 81611
0042 MINING STOCK PKWY #102
BRUSH CREEK LAND COMPANY LLC
ASPEN, CO 81612
PO BOX 1248
103
WEST MARIE T
ASPEN, CO 816111065
17 RIVERDOWN DR
VARGA CRISTINEL
ASPEN, CO 81612
PO BOX 3663
ALIEVA ZEMFIRA
ASPEN, CO 81611
410 PAEPCKE DR #102
ELVIS LLC
CARBONDALE, CO 81623
5000 CR 100
OHARA LORRAINE
MANHATTAN BEACH, CA 90266
600 29TH ST
DANCE PROGRESSIONS LLC
ASPEN, CO 81611
403 ABC
FULLER CHRISTOPHER JAMES
ASPEN, CO 81611
0197 PROSPECTOR RD #2104B
BRZOZA MARY KATE
ASPEN, CO 81611
412 PAEPCKE DR #302
MCBRIDE LAURIE MACK
ASPEN, CO 81611
303 E AABC
BUILDING 300 LLC
ASPEN, CO 81612
PO BOX 10493
PETERSEN KAREN
ASPEN, CO 81611
61 NARROW WAY
CROSS CANDACE
ASPEN, CO 81611
319 AABC #7
BRIGHAM PAMELA S & JOHN P
ASPEN, CO 81611
275 PAEPCKE DR #302
MENGES CHRISTOPHER R & SORAYA E
ASPEN, CO 81611
333 PAEPCKE DR #202
MENENDEZ NANCY
ASPEN, CO 81611
475 PAEPCKE DR #102
CITY OF ASPEN
ASPEN, CO 81611
130 S GALENA ST
SEARLE DENISE A
ASPEN, CO 81611
140 RIVERDOWN DR
ASPEN SKIING COMPANY LLC
ASPEN, CO 81612
PO BOX 1248
WISENER GREG W
KERRVILLE, TX 780289664
2585 BANDERA HWY
LAMASTER DARLENE M
ASPEN, CO 81611
415 AABC UNIT H
STUART STACEY
ASPEN, CO 81612
PO BOX 1981
MTN RESCUE ASPEN CHARITABLE TRUST
OKLAHOMA CITY, OK 73125
PO BOX 25523
JENKINS AMANDA
ASPEN, CO 81611
34 MOLLY CT #101
SANDS JASON
ASPEN, CO 81612
PO BOX 9252
OWEN MICHAEL
ASPEN, CO 81612
PO BOX 4281
DITTMAR GERMAN
ASPEN, CO 81611
721 PASS GO
SCHUMACHER JENNIFER
ASPEN, CO 81611
80 RIVERDOWN DR
KHARKHAL VOLHA F
ASPEN, CO 81611
475 PAEPCKE DR #302
BARBIC ERIK & SHAYNA REV TRUST
SOQUEL, CA 95073
PO BOX 1414
JOHNSON JEREMY R
ASPEN, CO 81611
711 PASS GO LN # 711
104
ALPINE GROVE CONDO ASSOC
ASPEN, CO 81611
414 PACIFIC AVE
KAVANAUGH KRISTEN & BRADLEY JEFFREY
ASPEN, CO 81611
170 FORGE RD #101
PMBM PARTNERS LLC
PARKER, CO 80134
10335 S PARKER RD
PITKIN COUNTY
ASPEN, CO 81611
530 E MAIN ST #301
DILLON ENTERPRISE LLC
ASPEN, CO 81611
409 AABC #K
BYFORD KEVIN J & ALLISON
ASPEN, CO 81611
123 FORGE RD # 206
HINDERBERGER KIRK D & SACHA J
ASPEN, CO 81611
140 TOTTERDOWN RD
DUKE PAMELA A
KERRVILLE, TX 78028-9664
2585 BANDERA HWY
WAANDERS PETER
ASPEN, CO 81611
32 TOTTERDOWN RD
BARROW JUSTIN & AMY
ASPEN, CO 816111282
196 RIVERDOWN DR
REDFIELD-MCINTYRE PATRICIA
ASPEN, CO 81612
PO BOX 7631
CARPENTER HILLARY BRIGID
ASPEN, CO 81611
317 AABC #202
VUGTEVEEN RYAN D
ASPEN, CO 81611
442 PAEPCKE DR # 102
WAGNER SETH & ISADORA
ASPEN, CO 81611
176 RIVERDOWN DR
RICE MOLLIE
ASPEN, CO 81611
275 PAEPCKE DR #101
CITY OF ASPEN
ASPEN, CO 81611
130 S GALENA ST
NELSON ADAM & AVERY
ASPEN, CO 81611
174 RIVERDOWN DR
CITY OF ASPEN
ASPEN, CO 81611
130 S GALENA ST
SAGEBRUSH CONDO ASSOC
ASPEN, CO 81611
309 AIRPORT BUSINESS CENTER
BURKHOLDER INVESTMENTS LTD
ASPEN, CO 81611
1596 W BUTTERMILK RD
WALDECK STEVEN
ASPEN, CO 81611
0124 TOTTERDOWN RD
MCBRIDE JOHN P
ASPEN, CO 81611
303 E AABC
MCBRIDE PETER MACK
ASPEN, CO 81611
303 AABC #E
PEARCE JUDY
ASPEN, CO 816113516
319 ASPEN AIRPORT BUSINESS CENTER UNIT Z
HKC LLC
ASPEN, CO 81611
214B ASPEN AIRPORT BUSINESS CTR
VACCAREZZA SANDRA
ASPEN, CO 81611
273 PAEPCKE DR #202
CUMMING COLIN S
ASPEN, CO 81611
PO BOX 826
HORTON DAYNA L
ASPEN, CO 81611
0161 MINING STOCK PKWY #204
DEER HILL COMM CONDO OWNERS LLC
ASPEN, CO 81611
210 AABC #AA
PLIEVA NINA
ASPEN, CO 81612
PO BOX 4926
105
PITKIN COUNTY
ASPEN, CO 81611
530 E MAIN ST #301
DEER HILL COMM CONDO OWNERS LLC
ASPEN, CO 81611
210 AABC #AA
GEMUS SAMUEL
ASPEN, CO 81611
440 PAEPCKE DR #301
RYAN KENNETH B & STEPHANIE C
ASPEN, CO 81611
192 RIVERDOWN DR
WEILER DEAN M
ASPEN, CO 81611
442 PAEPCKE DR #201
DEVLIN MARK A
ASPEN, CO 81611
312 AABC STE F
FOLK DOUGLAS C & TENILLE L
ASPEN, CO 81611
129 MINING STOCK PKWY #201
KIESE MICHELLE
ASPEN, CO 81611
425 PAEPCKE DR #302
CITY OF ASPEN
ASPEN, CO 81611
130 S GALENA ST
BURLINGAME RANCH I CONDO ASSOC
ASPEN, CO 81611
0042 MINING STOCK PKWY #102
NUSSMEIER ROBERT MARK & DANIELLE
ASPEN, CO 81611
440 PAEPCKE DR #204
STRAIT JOHN & DARLA
ASPEN, CO 81611
67 MOLLY CT 203
MORDECAI BRIAN G
DENVER, CO 802383222
10781 E 28TH PL
IVANOVA RUSLANA M
ASPEN, CO 81611
473 PAEPCKE DR # 302
PITKIN PARK PLACE
ASPEN, CO 81611
PACIFIC AVE
FERMAN MARCOS
ASPEN, CO 81611
475 PAEPCKE DR #101
THORNELY KAREN & GYLES
ASPEN, CO 81611
0055 MINING STOCK PKWY #201
GAMARRA ROBERTO & MIRIAM
ASPEN, CO 81612
PO BOX 906
HEWITT ELIZABETH ASHTON
ASPEN, CO 81611
185 FORGE RD #103
STORY SANDRA
ASPEN, CO 81611
412 AABC #A
ANDREWS ROSS
ASPEN, CO 816112905
430 E HYMAN AVE #4
AFTER GREGORY & SARAH C
ASPEN, CO 81611
123 FORGE RD #205
SHUFRO SUSAN E
ASPEN, CO 81611
44 CALLAHAN CT #201
MCBRIDE PETER MACK
ASPEN, CO 81611
303 AABC #E
MCINTYRE CAMERON
ASPEN, CO 81612
PO BOX 7631
LIZOTTE KENDRA
ASPEN, CO 81611
42 MINING STOCK PKWY #101
FOWLER PAUL & SABINE
ASPEN, CO 81612
PO BOX 11199
DANGLER DANIEL E & PAULETTE S
ASPEN, CO 81612
PO BOX 5008
ROARING FORK VALLEY PROPERTIES LLC
GLENWOOD SPRINGS, CO 81601
150 RIVER BEND WY
POWELL ALAN M
ASPEN, CO 81611
475 PAEPCKE DR #201
106
BURLINGAME RANCH I CONDO ASSOC
ASPEN, CO 81611
0042 MINING STOCK PKWY #102
CITY OF ASPEN
ASPEN, CO 81611
130 S GALENA ST
VIDAMOUR STACY & STEVEN
ASPEN, CO 81611
360 PAEPCKE DR #102
SOYKA FREDERICK K
ASPEN, CO 81611-1282
198 RIVERDOWN DR
MANCINI DUSTIN
ASPEN, CO 81611
80 RIVERDOWN DR
MAETZOLD CINDY REV TRUST
SNOWMASS, CO 81654
PO BOX 83
MCINALLY RYAN
ASPEN, CO 81611
412 PAEPCKE DR #101
ZYKAVA IRYNA
ASPEN, CO 81611
425 PAEPCKE DR #202
WIEWALL ELIZABETH
ASPEN, CO 81611
416 PACIFIC AVE #B
AABC STUDIO LLC
ASPEN, CO 81611
75 BUS BARN LN
MILOVANOVIC JOVANA
ASPEN, CO 81611
410 PAEPCKE DR #202
EGELHOFF JOHN
ASPEN, CO 81611
425 PAEPCKE DR #204
LITTLE BEAR LIVING TRUST
ASPEN, CO 81611
415 AABC #G
PERALTA ADRIA
ASPEN, CO 81611
273 PAEPCKE DR #204
COX ANTHONY E LIV TRUST
CAPITOLA, CA 95010
1260 41ST AVE #A
PEARCE MICHAEL E & VALERIE A
ASPEN, CO 81611
75 RIVERDOWN DR
NORLUND KAREN L
ASPEN, CO 81611
621 PASS GO LN
BLEILER GRETCHEN E
ASPEN , CO 81611
414 AABC #C
SAND STEVEN L
ASPEN, CO 81611-2556
416 AABC - APT D
LONG ROGER E & DEBORAH JO
ASPEN, CO 81612
PO BOX 2289
MENENDEZ NASRIN NOURIAN
ASPEN, CO 81612
PO BOX 8036
EVANS STEPHEN R
SNOWMASS VILLAGE, CO 81615
PO BOX 6877
VU TRUC K & TERESITA S
ASPEN, CO 81611
112 PASS GO LN
ASPEN SCHOOL DISTRICT #1
ASPEN, CO 81611
0235 HIGH SCHOOL RD
TRAJEN FLIGHT SUPPORT
PLANO , TX 75024
5201 TENNYSON PKWY #150
OTERO MICHELLE D
ASPEN, CO 81611
170 FORGE RD #105
TKG HOLDINGS LLC
ASPEN, CO 81611
1235 RED BUTTE DR
BASALT VALLEY PROPERTIES LLC
BASALT, CO 81621
PO BOX 1023
BAUER FRANK R II & NICOLE D
ASPEN, CO 81612
PO BOX 4974
BEAIRSTO KELLY
ASPEN, CO 816111020
412 PAEPCKE DR #201
107
HARRIS BRIAN PAYNTAR
ASPEN, CO 81612
PO BOX 395
BARNA BRENDA
ASPEN, CO 81611
475 PAEPCKE DR #203
WILSON FRED CHARLES
ASPEN, CO 81611
300 AABC SUITE M
MCBRIDE PETER MACK
ASPEN, CO 81611
303 AABC #E
CITY OF ASPEN
ASPEN, CO 81611
130 S GALENA ST
ASPEN SCHOOL DISTRICT #1
ASPEN, CO 81611
0235 HIGH SCHOOL RD
KURY KELLY MCNICHOLAS & WILLIAM SCOTT
ASPEN, CO 81611
333 PAEPCKE DR #201
TCI OF NORTH NEW JERSEY INC
PHILADELPHIA, PA 19103
ONE COMCAST CENTER 32ND FL
MORALES JENNIFER M
ASPEN, CO 81612
PO BOX 3663
MARSH KAMALA
ASPEN, CO 81612
PO BOX 507
309 SAGEBRUSH LLC
ASPEN, CO 81611
309 AABC UNIT G
FERRARA ZACHERY
ASPEN, CO 81611
475 PAEPCKE DR #301
LOEB RYAN & MHAIRI
ASPEN, CO 81611
67 MOLLY CT #102
RICHARDSON LISA M
SOCORRO, NM 878014449
615 WESTERN AVE
SMITH CHRISTOPHER H MARTIAL TRUST
ASPEN, CO 81612
PO BOX 1307
LYNK HARRY A II
ASPEN, CO 81611
510 PASS GO LN
LEMONS CHRISTOPHER K & CATHERINA
ASPEN, CO 81612
PO BOX 10008
LAPENNA LUKE & MAILE
ASPEN, CO 816111016
425 PAEPCKE DR #301
OBERMEYER AABC LLC
ASPEN, CO 81611
115 AABC
DODD LORI
ASPEN, CO 81611
440 PAEPCKE DR #101
VAN ALSTINE WINTER
ASPEN, CO 81611
0045 CALLAHAN CT #202
MOGLEWER HOWARD
ASPEN, CO 81612
PO BOX 10537
PRADHAN SUMAN
ASPEN, CO 816112574
317 ASPN ARPRT BUS CTR UNIT 201
ASPEN BUSINESS PARK INVESTORS LLC
PASADENA, CA 91106
1010 E UNION #100
FERRO THOMAS MICHAEL JR
ASPEN, CO 81611
410 PAEPCKE DR #302
OCALLAGHAN DANIEL J & CHRISTINE A
ASPEN, CO 81611
0042 MINING STOCK PKWY #105
ASPEN GROCERY LLC
SANTA BARBARA, CA 93150-5085
PO BOX 5085
WALLACE KELLY
ASPEN, CO 81611
360 PAEPCKE DR #103
PORCARO JILL A
ASPEN, CO 81611
418 AABC #D
AUGUR WHEATON
ASPEN, CO 81612
209 AABC #T
108
GANT CONDOMINIUM ASSOCIATION INC
ASPEN, CO 81611
610 S WEST END ST
OLIVER VERNARD
BASALT, CO 816211874
PO BOX 1874
BELMONT CHRISTOPHER & NARAH J
ASPEN, CO 81611
273 PAEPCKE DR #201
FRAZIER JAMES M
ASPEN, CO 816112560
417 AABC APT F
ASPEN CONSOLIDATED SANITATION
ASPEN, CO 81611
565 N MILL ST
HANCOCK MARGARET S & ADAM S
ASPEN, CO 81611
18 TOTTERDOWN RD
HILL RODNEY S
ASPEN, CO 81611
412 PAEPCKE DR #302
CARPENTER SCOTT
SOQUEL, CA 95073
PO BOX 1414
BREEN CAROL
ASPEN, CO 81611
123 FORGE RD #202
MCBRIDE PETER MACK
ASPEN, CO 81611
303 AABC #E
ABBOTT JAMIE LEIGH
ASPEN, CO 816112555
414 AABC #B
CWB ENTERPRISES INC
ASPEN, CO 81611
505 E HYMAN AVE
ROBERTSON JOHANNA
ASPEN, CO 81611
0161 MINING STOCK PKWY #201
GOSIN AMY L
ASPEN, CO 81612
PO BOX 897
SCHUBERT JANICE M
ASPEN, CO 81611
335 PAEPCKE DR #302
BIDGLE LLC
ASPEN, CO 81611
303 E AABC
GANT CONDO ASSOCIATION INC
ASPEN, CO 81611
610 S WEST END ST
SIMS KARRIE
ASPEN, CO 81611
170 FORGE RD #104
AZAR THOMAS
ASPEN, CO 81611
34 MOLLY CT #101
CASEY WILLIAM D
ASPEN, CO 81611
710 PASS GO LN #710
REYNOLDS AJA
ASPEN, CO 81611
313 AABC #202
AZEVEDO MARIANA BARBALHO
ASPEN, CO 81611
500 PAEPCKE DR
ASPEN SCHOOL DISTRICT #1
ASPEN, CO 81611
0235 HIGH SCHOOL RD
ORTMANN FAMILY TRUST
ASPEN, CO 81611
98 TOTTERDOWN RD
ARIEL KYLE
ASPEN, CO 81611
512 PASS GO LN
ROVIRA ELIZABETH MAE
ASPEN, CO 81611
209 AABC #N
NEILL FRANK THORNTON
ASPEN, CO 81612
PO BOX 9979
LAGARRIGUE JUAN E
ASPEN, CO 81611
273 PAEPCKE DR #202
BARBETTE JEAN ROBERT
ASPEN, CO 81611
209 VENTNOR AVE #Q
ROEHL LUCILE
ASPEN, CO 81611
909 E COOPER AVE #C8
109
RUBEL MECHELLE C
ASPEN, CO 81611
412 PAEPCKE DR #203
TORNARE RENE T
ATCO, NJ 08004-0943
PO BOX 943
BAUSOVA DAGMAR
ASPEN, CO 81611
405 CASTLE CREEK RD #12
ASPEN SCHOOL DISTRICT #1
ASPEN, CO 81611
0235 HIGH SCHOOL RD
LOVINS JUDITH HILL
SNOWMASS, CO 816549115
1739 SNOWMASS CRK RD
SULEK WESLEY C
ASPEN, CO 81611
129 MINING STOCK PKWY #102
HAAS JANET A
ASPEN, CO 81611
220 PASS GO LN #220
DECARLO KIM
ASPEN, CO 81612
PO BOX 9301
GREGORICH LOUIS
ASPEN, CO 81612
PO BOX 4046
PACIFIC AVE CONDO ASSOC
ASPEN, CO 81611
412 AABC
MATHISON ANN L REV LIV TRUST
FERGUS FALLS, MN 56537
22691 BIRCHWOOD ESTATES LN
SCOTT BERT G & ANNA L
ASPEN, CO 81611
0124 FORGE AVE #103
BYRNE RICHARD C & MICHELE A
ASPEN, CO 81611
97 RIVERDOWN DR
FIELDS MATTHEW & EMILY
ASPEN, CO 81611
123 FORGE RD #207
SEWARD KATHERINE T
ASPEN, CO 81612
PO BOX 4842
VETTER KRISTY & SHANE
ASPEN, CO 81611
333 PAEPCKE DR #101
FOSTER PIPER S
ANCHORAGE , AK 99501
1300 W 7TH #406
BURLINGAME RANCH II CONDO ASSOC
ASPEN, CO 81612
PO BOX 3149
VAN ARSDALE DANIELLE & LUCAS
ASPEN, CO 81611
178 RIVERDOWN DR
SOLDNER FAMILY LP LLLP
ASPEN, CO 81612
PO BOX 90
HOWE PAUL
ASPEN, CO 81611
210 PASS GO LN
CITY OF ASPEN
ASPEN, CO 81611
130 S GALENA ST
MCBRIDE KATHERINE HAWLEY
ASPEN, CO 81611
303 AABC #E
DEER HILL COMM CONDO OWNERS LLC
ASPEN, CO 81611
210 AABC #AA
MAJOR PAUL J & CYNTHIA L
ASPEN, CO 81611-1006
162 TOTTERDOWN RD
LYNCH MEAGHAN
ASPEN, CO 816112183
228 COTTONWOOD LN
MCBRIDE KATHERINE HAWLEY
ASPEN, CO 81611
303 AABC #E
GONZALES MARIA A
ASPEN, CO 816113568
413 AABC
OPEN ARMS WEST LLC
ASPEN, CO 81611
209 AABC UNIT L
KELLY TANIA M
ASPEN, CO 81611
42 MINING STOCK PKWY #103
110
RADIMO LTD
ASPEN, CO 81611
303 E AABC
ESTEBAN CARLOS IGNACIO
ASPEN, CO 81611
170 FORGE RD #105
RYERSON EDWIN & HEATHER
ASPEN, CO 81611
0123 FORGE RD #201
BRABEC DANIEL
ASPEN, CO 81611
335 PAEPCKE DR #201
BRUMMEL TONY & BARBARA
ASPEN, CO 81611
319 AABC #K
GALLAGHER SCOTT A
ASPEN, CO 81611
105 RIVERDOWN DR
SAVAGE VINCENT M
ASPEN, CO 81611
405 CASTLE CREEK RD #12
WILCHER ZACHARY
SNOWMASS VILLAGE, CO 81615
PO BOX 6631
SANCHEZ MALIEA S
ASPEN, CO 81611-3564
412 AABC # F
SMALL JACK E
ASPEN, CO 81611
712 PASS GO LN
DEER HILL COMM CONDO OWNERS LLC
ASPEN, CO 81611
210 AABC #AA
HUCKS CAROLINE M
ASPEN, CO 81611
129 MINING STOCK PKWY #202
PALMAZ ALEJANDRO
ASPEN, CO 81611
151 RIVERDOWN DR
DALLAKOTI KRISHNA
SCOTTSDALE, AZ 85259
10852 N 136TH PL
DEBSKA MAGDALENA
ASPEN, CO 81611
415 AABC #G
BEAN TIMOTHY N
ASPEN, CO 81611
124 FORGE RD #105
LEMOS TRISHKA M
ASPEN, CO 81611
55 MINING STOCK PKWY # 203
HOUSTON JENNIFER L
ASPEN, CO 81611
27 NARROW WY
WEISS JOLANTA
ASPEN, CO 81611
473 PAEPCKE DR #202
ETTLINGER DIANA G & JARED P
ASPEN, CO 81611
73 FORGE RD
EGAN THOMAS B
ASPEN, CO 81611
170 FORGE RD #102
DOHERTY WILLIAM M
ASPEN, CO 81611
273 PAEPCKE DR #102
HSIAO PEI JU
ASPEN, CO 81611
99 MINING STOCK PKWY #102
BROWN VALERIE
ASPEN, CO 81611
133 TRUSCOTT PL
RING PHILLIP M
CARBONDALE, CO 81623
129 CHEYENNE AVE
DEBACKER JASON & JULIA
ASPEN, CO 816112574
317 ASPEN AIRPORT BUSINESS CTR # 102
CITY OF ASPEN
ASPEN, CO 81611
130 S GALENA ST
MCBRIDE KATHERINE HAWLEY
ASPEN, CO 81611
303 AABC #E
PACIFIC AVE CONDO ASSOC
ASPEN, CO 81611
412 AABC
DAROCHA JESSE VIEIRA & FILIPE VIEIRA
SNOWMASS VILLAGE, CO 816156388
PO BOX 6388
111
BRUSH CREEK LAND COMPANY LLC
ASPEN, CO 81612
PO BOX 1248
ATLANTIC AVIATION ASE
PLANO, TX 75024
5201 TENNYSON PKWY #150
SMITH CHRISTOPHER H MARTIAL TRUST
ASPEN, CO 81612
PO BOX 1307
COLORADO MTN JR COLLEGE DIST
GLENWOOD SPRINGS, CO 816013456
802 GRAND AVE
MCBRIDE JOHN PAUL JR
SANTA BARBARA, CA 93150
PO BOX 5085
ASPEN SCHOOL DISTRICT #1
ASPEN, CO 81611
0235 HIGH SCHOOL RD
CITY OF ASPEN
ASPEN, CO 81611
130 S GALENA ST
HABERMAN TODD R
ASPEN, CO 81612
PO BOX 1659
SECRIST MARYELLEN D
ASPEN, CO 81611-1286
82 TOTTERDOWN RD
CITY OF ASPEN
ASPEN, CO 81611
130 S GALENA ST
MAYTIN JAY & LAUREN
ASPEN, CO 81611
66 TOTTERDOWN RD
WOLFER MARY ELIZABETH
ASPEN, CO 81611-1135
68 FORGE RD
KRAVTCHENKO-EUBANK TATYANA
ASPEN, CO 81611
333 PAEPCKE DR #302
ROBISON ELIZA MERCANTI & KENNETH SCOTT
ASPEN, CO 81611
475 PAEPCKE DR #202
ALPERN THERESE H
ASPEN, CO 816112115
1023 E HOPKINS AVE
HENRY CAROLINE L
ASPEN, CO 81611
117 FREE SILVER CT
BURLINGAME RANCH I CONDO ASSOC
ASPEN, CO 81611
0042 MINING STOCK PKWY #102
MILLER MICHELLE S
ASPEN, CO 81611
425 PAEPCKE DR #102
SOLONDZ TAMI S
ASPEN, CO 81611
114 TOTTERDOWN RD
COLUMBINE STORAGE PARTNERSHIP LLC
GLENWOOD SPRINGS, CO 81602
PO BOX 2009
SAPPHIRE PROPERTIES ASPEN LLC
ASPEN, CO 81612
PO BOX 423
WHITE JORDAN & ELISABETH
ASPEN, CO 81611
15 NARROW WY
SZABO JOHN
ASPEN, CO 81611
413F AABC
TORNARE FELIX
CARBONDALE, CO 81623
5000 COUNTRY RD 100
HAMAN MICHAEL C
SNOWMASS, CO 81654
192 YELLOW BRICK LN
BURLINGAME RANCH II CONDO ASSOC
ASPEN, CO 81612
PO BOX 3149
BROWN KIM EVETTE THOMAS
ASPEN, CO 81611
194 RIVERDOWN DR
JUCY STUDIO LLC
ASPEN, CO 81611
303 E AABC
KNAPP CHRISTIAN & JULIE
ASPEN, CO 81611
85 RIVERDOWN DR
CITY OF ASPEN
ASPEN, CO 81611
130 S GALENA ST
112
RYAN RICHARD E III
ASPEN, CO 81611
101 PASS GO LN #101
CITY OF ASPEN
ASPEN, CO 81611
130 S GALENA ST
MCFADIN LEE N III
ASPEN, CO 81611
209 AABC #J
QUINTANILLA PEDRO & IRMA
ASPEN, CO 81611
0045 CALLAHAN CT #102
414 PACIFIC AVENUE LLC
ENGLEWOOD, CO 80111
5692 S NOME ST
BARSTOW JON F
ASPEN, CO 81611
211 PASS GO LN
RONAY AMY R
ASPEN, CO 81611
0045 CALLAHAN CT #101
TYLER CHRISTOPHER D
ASPEN, CO 81612
PO BOX 4952
AVIS BUDGET RENT A CAR
PARSIPPANY, NJ 07054
6 SYLVAN WAY
BIXEL LESLIE
ASPEN, CO 81611
333 PAEPCKE DR #102
METCALF JENNIFER & IAN
ASPEN, CO 81611
42 MINING STOCK PKWY #107
PITKIN COUNTY
ASPEN, CO 81611
530 E MAIN ST #301
DESPROGES CHARLES
ASPEN, CO 81611
909 E COOPER AVE #C8
CARDER CECIL & KELSEY
ASPEN, CO 81611
275 PAEPCKE DR #203
EMENS BRADY
ASPEN, CO 81612
PO BOX 8737
BURLINGAME RANCH I CONDO ASSOC
ASPEN, CO 81611
0042 MINING STOCK PKWY #102
CHERNOSKY DAVID J
ASPEN, CO 81611
335 PAEPCKE DR #301
DRIVES ANTHONY
ASPEN, CO 81611
133 TRUSCOTT PL
FEINBERG JONATHAN J
ASPEN, CO 81611
140 RIVERDOWN DR
SODERQUIST RILEY C
ASPEN, CO 81611
320 NICHOLAS LN
NAIBI MARIAM M
ASPEN, CO 81611
511 PASS GO LN
ALL STAR MEDIA
ASPEN, CO 81611
1355 SAGE CT
HANCOCK JAMES D & LISA K
ASPEN, CO 81611
18 TUMBLEDOWN LN
PITKIN COUNTY
ASPEN, CO 81611
530 E MAIN ST #301
ASPEN FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT
ASPEN, CO 81611
420 E HOPKINS AVE
LODGE ANDREW
ASPEN, CO 81611
182 RIVERDOWN DR
FORSMAN DAVID & ELLEN
ASPEN, CO 81611
99 MINING STOCK PKWY
TRI DAL REAL ESTATE LTD
SOUTHLAKE, TX 76092
540 COMMERCE ST
PARKER JAMES & DARCY
ASPEN, CO 81611
123 FORGE RD #204
PAM LLC
ASPEN, CO 81611
208 AABC
113
VENTNOR 209 OWNERS LLC
ASPEN, CO 816113513
210 AABC STE AA
MACIAG CHRISTOPHER
ASPEN, CO 81611
412 PAEPCKE DR #301
MATHISON LUKE
ASPEN, CO 81611
PO BOX 10731
401 ABC LLC
ASPEN, CO 81612
PO BOX 9556
STRANAHAN MICHAEL
ASPEN, CO 81611
0148 RIVERDOWN DR
DEER HILL COMM CONDO OWNERS LLC
ASPEN, CO 81611
210 AABC #AA
DEER HILL COMM/LOFTS CONDO ASSOC
ASPEN, CO 81612
209 VENTNOR AVE
FINESILVER GABRIEL
ASPEN, CO 816111014
410 PAEPCKE DR #101
WILLIAMS JONATHAN
ASPEN, CO 81611
126 LUKE SHORT CT
HUNTER JOHN HENRY
ASPEN, CO 81611
610 PASS GO LN
BYRNES PATRICIA A
ASPEN, CO 81611
416E AABC
TEUSCHER JONATHAN W & ANNETTE L
ASPEN, CO 81611
126 MAPLE LN
RUTLEDGE WILLIAM O IV
ASPEN, CO 81611
412 PASS GO LN
CITY OF ASPEN
ASPEN, CO 81611
130 S GALENA ST
MENENDEZ LUIS A
ASPEN, CO 81612
PO BOX 8036
KEANAAINA FARRAH K
ASPEN, CO 81611
612 PASS GO LN #612
SMITH COLTER HAWKES
ASPEN, CO 81611
PO BOX 1307
OGUIN MEGAN
ASPEN, CO 81611
425 PAEPCKE DR #203
BURLINGAME RANCH II CONDO ASSOC
ASPEN, CO 81612
PO BOX 3149
MILLER JEFF & RONA
ASPEN, CO 81611
473 PAEPCKE DR #102
GOTTLIEB BENJAMIN
ASPEN, CO 81611
99 MINING STOCK PKWY #203
CAUSING JENNIFER M
ASPEN, CO 816111286
32 TOTTERDOWN RD
ROY SHELLEY & JASON
ASPEN, CO 81611
360 PAEPCKE DR #101
PITKIN COUNTY
ASPEN, CO 81611
530 E MAIN ST #301
PITKIN COUNTY
ASPEN, CO 81611
530 E MAIN ST #301
BORDAN ROBERT M
ASPEN, CO 81611
22 RIVERDOWN DR
BARROW DAVID J
ASPEN, CO 81611
520 PASS GO LN
FRANCIS JACQUELYN M
ASPEN, CO 81612
PO BOX 4952
GULL PROPERTIES LLC
ASPEN, CO 81611
25 ARDMORE CT
HINDMAN ALEXANDER
ASPEN, CO 81611
19 LINDVIG CT #203
114
THOMPSON JARED BOONE & ANNIE CATHLEEN
ASPEN, CO 81611
60 RIVERDOWN DR
AABC 210 OWNERS LLC
ASPEN, CO 816113513
210 AABC #AA
BENVENUTO JAMES W
ASPEN, CO 81611
27 NARROW WY
SAGE LLC
ASPEN, CO 81611
303E AABC
TURCHIARELLI LISA M
ASPEN, CO 81611-1071
110 RIVERDOWN DR
CITY OF ASPEN
ASPEN, CO 81611
130 S GALENA ST
WALKER LOUISE
ASPEN, CO 81612
PO BOX 2811
FERGUSON SAMUEL C
ASPEN, CO 81611
99 MINING STOCK PKY #201
STRECKER KATRINA E
ASPEN, CO 81611
442 PAEPCKE DR #201
RETTIG R HUNT
ASPEN, CO 81611
62 RIVERDOWN DR
SCHUHRKE KATHRYN L
ASPEN, CO 81611
0042 MINING STOCK PKWY #104
BENNETT TREVI M
ASPEN, CO 81611
417G AIRPORT BUSINESS CENTER
SHERWIN JEFFREY P & ANGELA M
ASPEN, CO 81611
161 MINING STOCK PKWY # 202
ASPEN/PITKIN COUNTY HOUSING AUTHORITY
ASPEN, CO 81611
210 E HYMAN AVE #202
AMSDEN DIANE
ASPEN, CO 81611
129 MINING STOCK PKWY #102
DICKINSON SUSAN
ASPEN, CO 81611
414F AABC
DE LAVAISSIERE BENOIT & MARCELA
ASPEN, CO 81611-2558
420 AABC APT B
CITY OF ASPEN
ASPEN, CO 81611
130 S GALENA ST
ASPEN SCHOOL DISTRICT #1
ASPEN, CO 81611
0235 HIGH SCHOOL RD
JUNIPER BUILDING LLC
ASPEN, CO 81611
303 AABC #E
PITKIN COUNTY
ASPEN, CO 81611
530 E MAIN ST #301
SEVART, LLC
SNOWMASS VILLAGE, CO 81615
PO BOX 6302
CITY OF ASPEN
ASPEN, CO 81611
130 S GALENA ST
PACE LAUREL
EUREKA, MT 599179142
81 TURTLE TRL
FULLER T NICOLE
ASPEN, CO 81611
522 PASS GO LN #522
CARROLAN SUSAN M
WOODY CREEK, CO 81656
PO BOX 206
MILLER LAURA
ASPEN, CO 81611
99 MINING STOCK PKWY #203
FOSTER TAD S
ASPEN, CO 81612
PO BOX 11514
HERNANDEZ JOSE I EGUIA
ASPEN, CO 81611
335 PAEPCKE DR #203
NETO ALINIO CUNHA AZEVEDO
ASPEN, CO 81611
500 PAEPCKE DR
115
ELISHA PERRIN
ASPEN, CO 81611
333 PAEPCKE DR #203
CARNEY TIMOTHY J & JENNIFER B
ASPEN, CO 81611
65 FORGE RD
MCBRIDE KATHERINE HAWLEY
ASPEN, CO 81611
303 AABC #E
LOW RICHARD B
ASPEN, CO 816116116
83 FORGE RD
DEL CAMPO ELIZA M MARTIN
ASPEN, CO 81611
335 PAEPCKE DR #203
BENNETT JENNIFER FULTON
ASPEN, CO 816116119
442 PAEPCKE DR #203
BURLINGAME RANCH I CONDO ASSOC
ASPEN, CO 81611
0042 MINING STOCK PKWY #102
BLIZZARD VIVIAN
ASPEN, CO 81611
161 MINING STOCK PKWY #102
PERLMUTTER JAMES ROBERT
ASPEN, CO 81611
44 CALLAHAN CT #201
MAROON CREEK LLC
ASPEN, CO 81611
10 CLUB CIR
CHILL LLLP
DENVER, CO 80204
761 KALAMATH ST
SMITH ANDREW
ASPEN, CO 81611
311 PASS GO LN
RICCERI PAULA S
ASPEN, CO 81612
PO BOX 3389
CITY OF ASPEN
ASPEN, CO 81611
130 S GALENA ST
CHEYNE ANNA E
ASPEN, CO 81611
45 CALLAHAN CT # 203
KENNEDY SUZANNE
ASPEN, CO 816111016
425 PAEPCKE DR # 101
YOUNG JAMES & JULIE
ASPEN, CO 81611
510 PAEPCKE DR
GLATHAR KIMBERLY
ASPEN, CO 81611
313 AABC #201
VAN WINKLE ALAN
ASPEN, CO 81611-1282
186 RIVERDOWN DR
OCONNOR CHRISTOPHER & VANESSA
ASPEN, CO 81612
PO BOX 9521
ERWIN JEFF & MADIAN
ASPEN, CO 81611
412 PAEPCKE DR #202
ROTARI ANDREI & MARIANA
ASPEN, CO 81611
333PAEPCKE DR #204
SZCZEKOT SHANNON KAY
ASPEN, CO 81611
273 PAEPCKE DR #302
COSTE CHRISTIAN & BUPPHA SRIBUNMA
ASPEN, CO 81612
PO BOX 11791
TRZCINSKI ADAM J
ASPEN, CO 81611
335 PAEPCKE DR #101
FRY KATHERINE
SNOWMASS VILLAGE, CO 816155082
PO BOX 5082
ZOHN CAMILLA
ASPEN, CO 81611
67 RIVERDOWN DR
PITKIN COUNTY
ASPEN, CO 81611
530 E MAIN ST #301
PEGLER SARAH F & ANDREW C
ASPEN, CO 81611
180 RIVERDOWN DR
PEREZ NURY MARGARITA AVILA
ASPEN, CO 81611
335 PAEPCKE DR #102
116
HOBAN SONYA L
ASPEN, CO 81611
326 TEAL COURT
CLAVELL DOREEN
ASPEN, CO 81612
PO BOX 3637
CITY OF ASPEN
ASPEN, CO 81611
130 S GALENA ST
CAIRNCROSS ROBERT J & DARILYNN M
ASPEN, CO 81611
34 MOLLY CT #103
PITKIN COUNTY
ASPEN, CO 81611
530 E MAIN ST #301
GAB AMY
ASPEN, CO 81611
129 MINING STOCK PKWY #101
KAIYAVONG FONGKEO
ASPEN, CO 81612
PO BOX 8499
BLOCKER BRANDON & JENNIFER
ASPEN, CO 81611
442 PAEPCKE DR #301
THERON GERALD B
ASPEN, CO 81611
45 CALLAHAN CT # 203
PITKIN COUNTY
ASPEN, CO 81611
530 E MAIN ST #301
MONAGHAN MARGARET & MATTHEW
ASPEN, CO 81611
333 PAEPCKE DR #301
KELLY DEBORA D
ASPEN, CO 81612
PO BOX 12143
EHRNST ANDREW & PAMELA K
ASPEN, CO 81611
410 AABC
TEKUS ALEXANDER & ALISON
ASPEN, CO 81611
412 AABC #B
FRETT JENNIFER
ASPEN, CO 81611
413 PACIFIC AVE #A
REH RICHARD
ASPEN, CO 81611
0163 FORGE RD UNIT #103
STUCK MARIANNE
ASPEN, CO 81611
473 PAEPCKE DR #201
PITKIN COUNTY
ASPEN, CO 81611
530 E MAIN ST #301
PITKIN COUNTY
ASPEN, CO 81611
530 E MAIN ST #301
YANG PETER J & VIRGINIA H
ASPEN, CO 81611
90 TOTTERDOWN RD
DEER HILL COMM CONDO OWNERS LLC
ASPEN, CO 81611
210 AABC #AA
MCCONNELL KAREN C
ASPEN, CO 81611
275 PAEPCKE DR #201
PITKIN COUNTY
ASPEN, CO 81611
530 E MAIN ST #301
LAMOUREAUX JOHN L
ASPEN, CO 81612
PO BOX 8499
KUBICA WESLEY & ALEXA
ASPEN, CO 81611
19 LINDVIG CT #202
CAMERON CYNTHIA P
ASPEN, CO 81611
0148 TOTTERDOWN ST
HULSLANDER BRADFORD J & XIMENA
ASPEN, CO 81611
322 PASS GO LN # 322
MESSINA SCOTT A
ASPEN, CO 81611
0024 TUMBLEDOWN LN
SABELLA JORDANA & CHRISTOPHER
ASPEN, CO 81611
412 AABC #C
81611 PROPERTIES LLC
ASPEN, CO 81611
637 E HYMAN AVE
117
EDGERLY ANNA
CARBONDALE, CO 816239516
17527 HIGHWAY 82
ARENSDORF KIMBERLY
ASPEN, CO 81611
310 PASS GO LN
OLIVER DAMON T & JENNIFER R
ASPEN, CO 81611
35 RIVERDOWN DR
LEDINGHAM DAVID
ASPEN, CO 81611
185 FORGE RD #106
MAROON CREEK LLC
ASPEN, CO 81611
10 CLUB CIR
ASPEN SELF STORAGE WAREHOUSES LLC
ASPEN, CO 81611
211 AABC
COHEN ADAM
ASPEN, CO 81611
67 RIVERDOWN DR
REDD TRAVIS
ASPEN, CO 81611
425 PAEPCKE DR #203
PLAZA 117 LLC
ASPEN, CO 81611
310 AABC
ESTOCK KIMBERLY & PETER JR
ASPEN, CO 81611
19 LINDVIG CT #201
WARD JOHN C & S ASHLEY
ASPEN, CO 81611
47 RIVERDOWN DR
MILLER JOINT REV TRUST
VIRGINIA BEACH, VA 23455
4129 COUNTRY CLUB CIR
GORTAN TIZIANO & ENRICA USSEGLIO
BASALT, CO 81621
260 COLUMBINE CT
GATES MICHAEL D
ASPEN, CO 816113423
102 PASS GO LN
THOMPSON ADRIANNA
ASPEN, CO 81611
185 FORGE RD #106
THOMPSON HANNAH
ASPEN, CO 816112556
416 AABC #G
SCHIRATO JASON PAUL
ASPEN, CO 81611
194 RIVERDOWN
VILLALOZ VALORA M
ASPEN, CO 81612
PO BOX 3
ASPEN SCHOOL DISTRICT #1
ASPEN, CO 81611
0235 HIGH SCHOOL RD
CHANG KIM MARIE
BASALT, CO 81621
PO BOX 997
LAMPE MARK & RACHEL
ASPEN, CO 81611
0123 FORGE RD #203
LOVINS JUDITH HILL
SNOWMASS, CO 816549115
1739 SNOWMASS CRK RD
FREEMAN PERRIN N III
ASPEN, CO 816113421
521 PASS GO LN
GASPERETTI JOHN
ASPEN, CO 81611
212 PASS GO LN
DEER HILL COMM CONDO OWNERS LLC
ASPEN, CO 81611
210 AABC #AA
MCBRIDE KATHERINE HAWLEY
ASPEN, CO 81611
303 AABC #E
PITKIN COUNTY
ASPEN, CO 81611
530 E MAIN ST #301
ABC 32 LLC
ASPEN, CO 81611-1818
532 E HOPKINS AVE
MCBRIDE PETER MACK
ASPEN, CO 81611
303 AABC #E
ROPER AMBER L
ASPEN, CO 81611
273 PAEPCKE DR #102
118
KNECHTEL TIMOTHY J
ASPEN, CO 81611
273 PAEPCKE DR #204
GROSS HILARY ADAMS
ASPEN, CO 81611
313 AABC #102
CITY OF ASPEN
ASPEN, CO 81611
130 S GALENA ST
MILLER STEVEN K & ASHLEY
ASPEN, CO 81611
161 MINING STOCK PKWY #203
SAKS MARGARET LANDEN
ASPEN, CO 81611
209 AABC #J
PITKIN PARK PLACE PHASE III CONDO ASSOC
ASPEN, CO 81611
PACIFIC AVE
PERGANDE DON W
ASPEN, CO 81611
473 PAEPCKE DR #101
S4MO LLC
ASPEN, CO 81611
409 AABC #A
LONG JENNIFER
ASPEN, CO 81611
0161 MINING STOCK PKWY #101
CITY OF ASPEN
ASPEN, CO 81611
130 S GALENA ST
CITY OF ASPEN
ASPEN, CO 81611
130 S GALENA ST
COULON KRISTIN K
ASPEN, CO 81611
715 E HYMAN #27
STRASSBURGER SARAH E
ASPEN, CO 81611
182 RIVERDOWN DR
SIRKO ANDREA SABBA
ASPEN, CO 81611
412 PAEPCKE DR #102
TINDALL JENNIFER
ASPEN, CO 81611
67 MOLLY CT #202
SUTTON JORDAN & MELISSA
ASPEN, CO 81611-1282
184 RIVERDOWN DR
LAVY ABIGAIL N
ASPEN, CO 81611
317 AABC #101
PITKIN COUNTY
ASPEN, CO 81611
530 E MAIN ST #301
HOWELLS THOMAS
ASPEN, CO 81611
321 PASS GO LN
HART LEAH
ASPEN, CO 81611
412 AABC #E
MIHAYLOVA VESELA
ASPEN, CO 81611
275 PAEPCKE DR #202
REVEAL STEPHAN & SARA A
ASPEN, CO 81611
273 PAEPCKE DR #301
WINTER JEFFREY M & ELLEN E
ASPEN, CO 816116114
185 FORGE RD #105
PIPER NICHOLAS
ASPEN, CO 81611
425 PAEPCKE DR #204
FOSTER MELISSA C
ASPEN, CO 81612
PO BOX 11514
MCDADE JEFFREY T & MARGARITA C
ASPEN, CO 81611
163 FORGE RD #101
PACIFIC AVENUE ASSOCIATES LLLP
ASPEN, CO 81611
531 W GILLESPIE
OSTRANDER KENNETH F
ASPEN, CO 81611
90 RIVERDOWN DR
ASPEN GROCERY LLC
SANTA BARBARA, CA 93150-5085
PO BOX 5085
CARPENTER CURT L & CORNELIA D
ASPEN, CO 816113516
319 AABC #EF
119
KRISHNAMURTI MADHU B
ASPEN, CO 81611
418 - H AABC
EKLUND SCOTT & JODIE
ASPEN, CO 816111014
410 PAEPCKE DR #201
PITKIN COUNTY
ASPEN, CO 81611
530 E MAIN ST #301
SMITH ALEX CHRISTOPHER
ASPEN, CO 81611
360 PAEPCKE DR #104
YAEGER JENNIFER & BENJAMIN
ASPEN, CO 81612
PO BOX 909
COOMBE DOUGLAS A & DEBORAH A
ASPEN, CO 81611-1006
106 TOTTERDOWN RD
BURLINGAME HOUSING INC
BASALT, CO 81621
PO BOX 2685
ANDERSON STEPHEN & COLLEEN
ASPEN, CO 81611-1282
188 RIVERDOWN DR
BRONSTEIN DYAN R & DANIEL E
ASPEN, CO 81611
442 PAEPCKE DR #204
120
Neighbor Outreach
• Email invitations were sent to residents who previously expressed interesting in the
lumberyard project for the December 15, 2021 Open Houses at the Limelight Lodge in Aspen
• The display table include information on the upcoming annexation of the Aspen Mini Storage
parcel and the subdivision of the Burlingame “triangle”
• Individual outreach has been provided to interested stakeholders such as John McBride
(AABC), Dylan Johns (Mountain Rescue), and Pitkin County Community Development staff
• A Frequently Asked Question document was created and distributed with the public notice,
attached
• Hearings are listed on the City of Aspen’s project website:
https://www.aspencommunityvoice.com/lumberyard
121
122
123
124
125
Aspen Mini - Storage _ Ben Anderson - Page 1 of 1
Ad #: vfrMIIz8KAkof3OrNyRT
Customer: Lilly Culver
Aspen Mini - Storage _ Ben Anderson
PROOF OF PUBLICATION
ASPEN TIMES
STATE OF COLORADO } SS
COUNTY OF PITKIN }
I, Allison Pattillo, do solemnly swear that I am Publisher of , says: The
Aspen Times, that the same weekly newspaper printed, in whole or in part
and published in the County of Pitkin, State of Colorado, and has a
general circulation therein; that said newspaper has been published
continuously and uninterruptedly in said County of Pitkin for a period of
more than fifty-two consecutive weeks next prior to the first publication of
the annexed legal notice or advertisement; that said newspaper has been
admitted to the United States mails as a periodical under the provisions of
the Act of March 3, 1879, or any amendments thereof, and that said
newspaper is a weekly newspaper duly qualified for publishing legal
notices and advertisements within the meaning of the laws of the State of
Colorado.
That the annexed legal notice or advertisement was published in the
regular and entire issue of every number of said weekly newspaper for the
period of 1 insertion; and that the first publication of said notice was in the
issue of said newspaper dated 10 Feb 2022 in the issue of said
newspaper.
Total cost for publication: $23.32
That said newspaper was regularly issued and circulated on those dates.
______________________________
Publisher
02/10/2022Subscribed to and sworn to me this date, ________
______________________________
Notary Public, Pitkin County, Colorado
My commission expires: August 19, 2024
126