Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutagenda.apz.20220315_vB1 AGENDA ASPEN PLANNING & ZONING COMMISSION March 15, 2022 4:30 PM, WebEx Virtual Meeting (See agenda packet for instructions to join the meeting) NOTICE: AGENDA PACKET UPDATED ON MARCH 14, 2022 AT 3:55 PM The following files were added to the hearing item for 191 Eastwood Drive: 1) Applicant Letter to Staff Findings 03142022 2) Applicant Letter to Staff Findings 03142022 - EXHIBIT A 3) Applicant Letter to Staff Findings 03142022 - EXHIBIT C I.VIRTUAL MEETING INSTRUCTIONS TO JOIN ONLINE: Go to www.webex.com and click on "Join a Meeting" Enter Meeting Number: 2559 748 9818 Enter Password: 81611 Click "Join Meeting" -- OR -- JOIN BY PHONE Call: 1-650-479-3208 Enter Meeting Number: 2559 748 9818 Enter Password: 81611 II.ROLL CALL III.COMMENTS IV.MINUTES IV.A.Draft Meeting Minutes for February 1, 2022 minutes.apz.20220201.docx V.DECLARATION OF CONFLICT OF INTEREST VI.PUBLIC HEARINGS VI.A.191 Eastwood Drive, Special Review Nonconforming Structure and Variance Requests Memo 191 Eastwood Dr_Special Review.docx 1 2 P&Z Resolution No. ____ Series 2022_191 Eastwood Dr.docx Exhibit A - 191 Eastwood Dr_Special Review Criteria.docx Exhibit B - 191 Eastwood Dr_Variance Criteria.docx Exhibit C -- 191 Eastwood_Application.pdf Applicant Letter to Staff Findings 03142022.docx Applicant Letter to Staff Findings 03142022 - EXHIBIT A.pdf Applicant Letter to Staff Findings 03142022 - EXHIBIT C.pdf VII.OTHER BUSINESS None VIII.ADJOURN NEXT RESOLUTION NUMBER: #08, SERIES 2022 TYPICAL PROCEEDING FORMAT FOR ALL PUBLIC HEARINGS 1) Conflicts of Interest (handled at beginning of agenda) 2) Provide proof of legal notice (affidavit of notice for PH) 3) Staff presentation 4) Board questions and clarifications of staff 5) Applicant presentation 6) Board questions and clarifications of applicant 7) Public comments 8) Board questions and clarifications relating to public comments 9) Close public comment portion of bearing 10) Staff rebuttal/clarification of evidence presented by applicant and public comment 11) Applicant rebuttal/clarification End of fact finding. Deliberation by the commission commences. No further interaction between commission and staff, applicant or public 12) Chairperson identified the issues to be discussed among commissioners. 13) Discussion between commissioners* 14) Motion* *Make sure the discussion and motion includes what criteria are met or not met Revised January 9, 2021 2 Minutes Aspen Planning and Zoning Commission February 1, 2022 Page 1 of 6 Chairperson McGovern called the regular Planning and Zoning (P&Z) meeting for February 1 st, 2022 to order at 4:30 PM. Commissioners in attendance: Ruth Carver, Sam Rose, Brittanie Rockhill, Scott Marcoux, Spencer McKnight, Teraissa McGovern. Staff in Attendance: Amy Simon, Planning Director Michelle Bonfils-Thibeault, Planner Kevin Rayes, Planner Kate Johnson, Assistant City Attorney Cindy Klob, Records Manager COMMISSIONER COMMENTS Ms. Carver announced she recently married the mayor of Crested Butte, and she will be completing her term with P&Z in March. Ms. McGovern congratulated her. STAFF COMMENTS Ms. Simon congratulated Ms. Carver. She stated staff has not yet followed up on the commission’s request to schedule a work session. She and Ms. Johnson decided it would be best to have the work session on a day or time that is not a regularly scheduled meeting. Ms. McGovern stated her preference is to have a virtual meeting. Ms. Rockhill agreed. The commissioners are open to other days of the week. Ms. Simon stated she would email the commissioners to determine the best day for the work session. PUBLIC COMMENTS None APPROVAL OF MINUTES Mr. McKnight motioned to approve the minutes for January 4, 2022 and was seconded by Ms. Carver. Ms. McGovern requested a roll call: Mr. Rose, yes; Ms. Rockhill, yes; Mr. Marcoux, yes; Mr. McKnight, yes; Ms. Carver, yes; and Ms. McGovern, yes; for a total of six (6) in favor – zero (0) not in favor. The motion passed. DECLARATION OF CONFLICT OF INTEREST None PUBLIC HEARINGS Ms. McGovern asked if notice had been provided. Ms. Johnson responded proper notice had been provided for both hearings. Rio Grande Park Signage Plan – Amendment to Detailed Review Approval Ms. McGovern then opened the hearing and turned the floor over to staff. 3 Minutes Aspen Planning and Zoning Commission February 1, 2022 Page 2 of 6 Ms. Bonfils-Thibeault, Planner, introduced the application for a minor amendment to a development review regarding the signage plan in the Rio Grande Park. Mr. Mike Tunte, Parks and Open Space Landscape Architect and Construction Manager, provided an overview of the signage and wayfinding project for the joined spaces of the John Denver Sanctuary and Rio Grande Park. Mr. Tunte then provided some history regarding the area. He stated in the late 1800’s, this area was an industrial site with a rail yard, railroad switch yard, and a lead concentrator site. In 1998, John Bennett, a former Mayor, and Jeff Woods, a former Parks and Open Space Director, approached Ms. Annie Denver about creating a sanctuary for John Denver and ended up dedicating a 4.5 acre site within the Rio Grande Park. In the mid 2000’s, the Parks Department began a complex transformation of the site. It is now one of the most sought after sites for visitors to connect with nature. He stated the interpretive effort which is the focus of today began about four years ago. Mr. Woods and Ms. Denver designed the sanctuary along with Parks department staff and a contracted interpretation design firm. He stated the primary goal of the interpretation and wayfinding elements is to address some of the site’s features and amenities. He noted comments from the City’s Open Space and Trails board have been included in the plan. He then reviewed the goals of the plan in preparation for implementation. Mr. Tunte noted one of the goals is to provide for visitor needs and interests with a minimal number of signs. The plan includes both physical elements providing high-level information and a corresponding application to provide a greater depth of information. He displayed a site plan mapping the interpretive and wayfinding elements and noted there are seven welcome orientation panels, two small directional blades to assist with wayfinding and seven interpretive panels. Mr. Tunte displayed an example of a primary and secondary welcome panels and discussed the materials to be used. He then displayed a pictures of the proposed locations of the welcome panels. He also provided an example of another exhibit panel, materials and proposed locations. He noted one panel will be printed on a translucent panel to allow the visitor to see a hint of the existing landscape through the panel. He displayed other panel locations and free-standing panels. He noted the panels will not be mounted in the pathway as displayed. He then displayed an example of a sign to be placed near the theatre providing wayfinding and a locking panel for theatre shows. Mr. Tunte then displayed examples of the application available for viewing to find other elements in the sanctuary, the history and possible actions visitors can take. Mr. Tunte reiterated the Open Space and Trails Board unanimously voted on October 21, 2021 in support of the plan. Ms. McGovern asked if there were any questions of the applicant. 4 Minutes Aspen Planning and Zoning Commission February 1, 2022 Page 3 of 6 Ms. Carver feels the main entrance is the corner of Rio Grande Pl and Mill St. Mr. Tunte replied there is quite a bit of signage on that corner, but the larger entrance will be next to the skate park. Mr. Austin Weiss, Parks and Open Space Director, pointed out the corridor from Aspen Mountain down to the Roaring Fork River. The main entrance of the park is on the corridor. Mr. Matt Kuhn, Parks Director, noted the corner already has a boulder with the name of the park engraved on it. Ms. Carver asked how many signs will be for the theatre? Mr. Tunte responded just the one sign is being replaced. Ms. McGovern asked if the existing signage near the entrance will be removed. Mr. Kuhn stated the trail map on the left will remain and the signs on the right are up for discussion. Ms. McGovern then turned the floor over to staff. Ms. Michelle Bonfils-Thibeault introduced herself and then reviewed the application for a minor amendment to a detailed review approval. She displayed and discussed a list of historical park approvals. She noted signage had not been addressed in any of the historic approvals. Ms. Bonfils-Thibeault then reviewed the criteria. Criteria A was discussed regarding the compliance with a project review approval based on the 2006 Civic Master Plan (CMP). Staff finds this criterion to be met. She noted both Criteria B: Growth Management and Criteria C: Site Planning and Landscape Architecture are not applicable. She then discussed Criteria D: Proposed architectural details which staff finds met. Ms. Bonfils-Thibeault closed stating staff recommends approval. Ms. McGovern asked if there were any questions of staff. There were none. Ms. McGovern then opened for public comment. There were none. Ms. McGovern then opened for commissioner discussion. Ms. Rockhill stated it seems very straightforward and she supports it. Ms. Carver feels they have done a beautiful job with the signage. She doesn’t believe people will use Galena Plaza no matter what staff does to improve the connection to the park. She would prefer the park remain a bit wild with a sense of discovery. She feels there are a bit too many signs and would like to see half the number of signs. Mr. Marcoux feels they did a great job balancing out the signs and like the use of the QR code and application to provide more detail. The application can adapt for seasons and events. Mr. Rose agrees with Mr. Marcoux and Ms. Rockhill. Mr. McKnight recalled previously discussing signage plans with staff and his only thoughts were to not have so many signs all over Aspen. He loves the area and like Ms. Carver, likes the sense of discovery there. He also feels the signs look great and likes the translucent sign. 5 Minutes Aspen Planning and Zoning Commission February 1, 2022 Page 4 of 6 Ms. McGovern reminded the commissioners of their purview regarding the review criteria and the commissioners should base their responses on the criteria. Ms. McGovern believes everyone supports approving the application. Ms. Carver feels the number of signs clutter the park and hoped Parks can look into it more. Ms. McGovern asked if the commission is approving the sign plan as presented or just that signs are okay to use in the park. Ms. Bonfils-Thibeault responded the commission is approving the presented sign plan as provided in the application. Ms. McGovern would like to add something the resolution to note the changes discussed. Ms. Bonfils-Thibeault responded the resolution could be amended. Ms. Carver stated she would support removing the current signs except for the skate park sign. Mr. Marcoux does not feel the entrance should not be congested with signs. Ms. McGovern suggested amending the resolution to have the Parks department add existing signs to the plan and minimize redundancy as much as possible. Ms. Rockhill motioned to approve the resolution including the proposed amendment made by Chairperson McGovern. Mr. Rose seconded the motion. Ms. McGovern requested a roll call for Resolution #04, Series 2022: Ms. Carver, yes; Mr. Marcoux, yes; Mr. McKnight, no; Mr. Rose, yes; Ms. Rockhill, yes; and Ms. McGovern, yes for a total five (1) in favor – one (1) not in favor. The motion passed. Ms. McGovern then closed the hearing. 108 Neale Ave| Herron Park | Stream Margin Review & Special Review to Establish an Alternative Top of Slope Ms. McGovern opened the hearing and turned the floor over to staff. Mr. Kevin Rayes introduced himself and then described the application to establish an alternative top of slope. He described the location of the park and displayed a footprint of the park. He then displayed a site plan with lines indicating the area under a stream margin review. Any proposed development in the stream margin area requires a heightened review. Mr. Rayes noted a new playground was installed last fall and it went through a stream margin review administratively. The playground project also received a No-Rise Certification from the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA). He displayed pictures of the park including the entrance and the porta-potty structure. He stated the application proposed to replace the temporary porta-potty structure with a permanent structure, to memorialize the building envelope around the restroom structure and to memorialize the building envelope around the playground structure. 6 Minutes Aspen Planning and Zoning Commission February 1, 2022 Page 5 of 6 Mr. Rayes displayed a survey showing the top of bank location established 10 or 15 years ago which doesn’t reflect an actual top of bank. The application requests to amend the top of bank as recommended by the Engineering department. He also displayed some layers defined by FEMA including Zone AE (floodway) for a one hundred year flood and Zone X for a five hundred year flood. He stated based on these studies, it doesn’t make sense to memorialize the building envelopes. He then provided photos of the proposed restroom. A small portion of it will reside in the one hundred year flood zone so staff added a condition of approval for the applicant to obtain a No-Rise Certification from FEMA. He added they could also move the restroom a few feet to remove it from the one hundred year flood zone instead of obtaining the certification. Mr. Rayes next reviewed the stream margin review criteria. Staff found all criterion to be met and recommend approval subject to the conditions listed in the draft resolution. Ms. McGovern asked if the commissioners had questions staff or the applicant. Mr. McKnight asked if the commission is approving anything involving the structure of the restroom. Mr. Rayes stated the park is not a planned development so there are no criteria for the design standards. It is zoned in the Park Zone District. The structure must comply with height and floor area requirements which will be confirmed during the building permit process. Ms. Carver feels the restrooms are critical for this location. She asked if the Parks department will carefully look at the usage requirements for the visitors to ensure the restrooms accommodate their needs. Mr. Tunte responded the image displayed earlier is an example of a design. He then described the process including direction from the Open Space and Trails Board and City Council to build the restrooms. He stated they are looking at installing a prefabricated structure which would allow them to include features to meet the needs of the visitors. Ms. Rockhill asked if they will be compost toilets. Mr. Tunte stated they will not be compost toilets. Mr. Kuhn added they are considering including two unisex stalls, sinks, toilets, and changing stations. Mr. Marcoux asked if staff could hold off considering new signage for this park until after the changes to the signs at the Rio Grande Park have been completed and the visitors have had time to use it. Ms. McGovern opened for public comments. There were none so she closed the public comment portion of the hearing. Ms. McGovern opened for commissioner deliberation. She then paraphrased the review criteria. Mr. Rose and Mr. Marcoux agreed with staff’s recommendation. Ms. Rockhill feels it meets the criterion. She’s not sure why the applicant would not just move the building a few feet to remove it from the flood plain, but she is okay with staff’s suggested condition of approval. Ms. McGovern remarked she does not see the “or” condition in the draft resolution. Ms. Rockhill suggested the condition be added to the resolution. 7 Minutes Aspen Planning and Zoning Commission February 1, 2022 Page 6 of 6 Ms. Carver also agreed with staff’s recommendation. She feels the playground is great and the restrooms are needed. Mr. McKnight agrees with the previous commissioner’s statements and with staff’s recommendation. Ms. McGovern also finds the criterion to be met and agrees with staff’s recommendation. She then ended commissioner deliberation. Ms. McGovern suggested modifying item 1 under Section 2 to state “A No-Rise Certification shall be obtained prior to building permit if any portion of the proposed restroom facility is within the one hundred year floodplain.” Mr. McKnight motioned to approve Resolution #5, Series 2022 for a stream margin review and special review to memorialize the alternative top of slope and to approve the development of a permanent restroom facility subject to the conditions as listed and discussed. His motion was seconded by Ms. Rockhill. Ms. McGovern requested a roll call: Ms. Carver, yes; Mr. Rose, yes; Mr. Marcoux, yes; Ms. Rockhill, yes; Mr. McKnight, yes; and Ms. McGovern, yes for a total six (6) in favor – zero (0) not in favor. The motion passed. Ms. McGovern thanked staff and the applicant and then closed the hearing. OTHER BUSINESS None Mr. McKnight motioned to adjourn and was seconded by Ms. Carver. All in favor and the meeting was adjourned at 6:00 pm. Cindy Klob, Records Manager 8 Page 1 of 3 MEMORANDUM TO: City of Aspen Planning and Zoning Commission FROM: Michelle Bonfils Thibeault,AICP Planner II THRU: Amy Simon, Planning Director MEMO DATE:March 1, 2022 MEETING DATE:March 15, 2022 RE:191 Eastwood Drive, Special Review-Nonconforming Structure and Front & Rear Yard Variance requests APPLICANT: Jade Peak 2, LLC c/o Chris Warner REPRESENTATIVE: Kim Raymond, Kim Raymond Architects LOCATION: 191 Eastwood Drive CURRENT ZONING & USE: This property is located in the Moderate-Density Residential (R-15B) zone district and is developed with a single-family home. PROPOSED ZONING AND USE: No Change. SUMMARY:The application requests Special Review, Replacement of Nonconforming Structure and Variances to the front and rear yard setback requirements in the R-15B zone to allow for the redevelopment of the nonconforming front elevation of the building and construction of a new garage. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Reduction of nonconformities is a goal of the land use code. Variations have a high bar to ensure that the land use code is uniformly applied. Staff recommends the Planning and Zoning Commission adopt the Resolution to deny the Special Review, Replacement of a Nonconforming Structure and the Variance requests. Figure 1.191 Eastwood Dr. Aerial Image 9 Page 2 of 3 LAND USE REQUEST AND REVIEW PROCEDURES: The Applicant is requesting the following land use approval from the Planning and Zoning Commission: Special Review (Pursuant to Land Use Code Section 26.430.040.B): An application requesting Replacement of Non-Conforming Structures to expand the front façade into the front yard. The Planning and Zoning Commission is the final review body. Variance (Pursuant to Land Use Code Section 26.314): An application requesting a variance from the front and rear yard setback requirements of the R-15B zone district for the siting of a new garage. The expansion of the nonconforming front elevation of the existing building also requests a variance from the front yard setback requirement. SUMMARY OF PROJECT: Existing Conditions: The subject property is a legally established nonconforming single-family residence located in the R-15B zone district, in the Eastwood Subdivision. In 1991, the neighborhood was annexed and the City established a new zone district -- the R-15B zone, to acknowledge the environmentally sensitive conditions of this subdivision including steep slopes and proximity to the 8040 Greenline. The existing structure is nonconforming in consideration of a limited element in the rear yard setback (not proposed to be changed), the front most elevation of the building located the front yard setback, a deck in the front yard setback, an exterior stair in the front yard setback, and grading in the rear yard setback exceeding the 30 inches in height. STAFF COMMENTS: Special Review:The application is subject to Special Review for Replacement of a Nonconforming Structure. The applicant proposes to expand the nonconforming structure further into the front yard setback requiring a variance of 10ft from the front yard setback standard. The applicant also requests to construct a garage in the existing parking area, which, as designed, requires variances to the rear and front yard setback requirements. It is the goal of the City and a land use code standard that nonconformities may only be maintained or reduced in size during redevelopment activities. To that end, as part of the planned work, the applicant proposes to remove the a staircase and reduce the size of a deck which both intrude into the front setback. The subject site is located in the 8040 Greenline environmentally sensitive area, and undeveloped areas of the lot are 20+% steep slopes. While other City zone districts require a floor area reduction related to slope conditions, this neighborhood successfully advocated to omit this from the parameters for the R-15B zone. However, the R-15B zone does have setback standards to limit development impacts. Staff finds that development in this area should be carefully planned and non-confirming conditions should be removed to the extent possible, not extended. Variance: The application requests variances for the proposed new garage to allow encroachments into both the front and rear yard setbacks. The proposed garage would result in the removal of a nonconforming retaining wall in the rear yard. The application also requests variances to allow for expansion of the nonconforming front elevation of the building to be expanded further into the front yard. Variances are granted for demonstrated hardships. Staff does not find that hardship has been established, and finds that setback limitations are particularly important to limit development impacts on the environmentally sensitive conditions of the Eastwood Subdivision. RECOMMENDATION: The Community Development Department recommends the Planning and Zoning Commission deny the proposed Special Review requesting Replacement of a Nonconforming Structure and deny the proposed request for Variances to the front and rear yard setback requirements of the R-15B zone. RECOMMENDED MOTION: The draft resolution is written in the affirmative. If the P&Z agrees with Staff’s recommendation and wishes to deny the current request for Special Review for Replacement of a Nonconforming Structure and to deny Variances to the R-15B zone setback requirements, the following motion should be used. “I move to approve Resolution #__, Series of 2022 denying Special Review for Replacement of a Nonconforming Structure and denying Variances to setback requirements.” 10 Page 3 of 3 ATTACHMENTS: Resolution #__, Series of 2022 Exhibit A – Special Review Criteria Exhibit B – Variance Review Criteria Exhibit C – Application 11 P&Z Resolution # ____, Series of 2022 1 RESOLUTION #__ (SERIES OF 2022) A RESOLUTION OF THE ASPEN PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION DENYING SPECIAL REVIEW/NONCONFORMING STRUCTURE REPLACEMENT AND DENYING FRONT AND REAR YARD SETBACK VARIANCES FOR THE PROPERTY LOCATED AT 191 EASTWOOD DRIVE, LOTS 24, EASTWOOD SUBDIVISION, CITY OF ASPEN, COLORADO PARCEL ID: 2735-122-11-006 WHEREAS, the Community Development department received an application from Kim Raymond Architects, representing Jade Peak II, LLC c/o Chris Warner, requesting Special Review/Replacement of Nonconforming Structure and Front and Rear Yard Variances related to development of additional floor area into the front yard setback and a new garage; and, WHEREAS, the Community Development department Staff reviewed the application for compliance with the applicable review standards; and, WHEREAS,upon review of the application and the Land Use Code standards, and referral of the application to other City Departments for comments, the Community Development Director recommends Special Review and Variance denial to expand an existing non-conforming structure and new garage provided for in section 26.312.030 and 26.314 of the Land Use Code; and, WHEREAS, the City of Aspen Planning and Zoning Commission reviewed and considered the application under the applicable provisions of the Land Use Code as identified herein, in particular Section 26.312.030 and 26.314, reviewed and considered the recommendation of the Community Development Director and took and considered public comment at a duly noticed public hearing on March 15, 2022; and, WHEREAS, the City of Aspen Planning and Zoning Commission finds that the development proposal for Special Review/Replacement of Nonconforming Structure does not meet the applicable review criteria and that denial of the request is consistent with the goals and objectives of the Land Use Code; and, WHEREAS, the City of Aspen Planning and Zoning Commission finds that the development proposal for Variance to R-15B Zone Front and Rear Yard standards does not meet the applicable review criteria or prove hardship, and that denial of the request is consistent with the goals and objectives of the Land Use Code; and, WHEREAS, the City of Aspen Planning and Zoning Commission finds that this Resolution furthers and is necessary for the promotion of public health, safety, and welfare, and, WHEREAS, the City of Aspen Planning and Zoning Commission approves Resolution #___, Series of 2022, by a ____ to ___ (x - x) vote, denying Special Review/Replacement of Nonconforming Structure and denying Variance requests as identified herein. 12 P&Z Resolution # ____, Series of 2022 2 NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED the City of Aspen Planning and Zoning Commission finds as follows: Section 1:Legal Non-Conforming Structure Pursuant to the procedures and standards set forth in Title 26 of the Aspen Municipal Code, the Planning and Zoning Commission hereby denies expansion of this nonconforming structure in a manner that requires setback variances. The residence may be expanded in conformance with the zone district. Section 2:Side Yard Setback Variance Pursuant to the procedures and standards set forth in Title 26 of the Aspen Municipal Code, the Planning and Zoning Commission hereby denies dimensional variances to expand the existing nonconforming structure into the front yard and to build a new garage requiring both front and rear yard variances from the R-15B Zone. Section 3: Material Representations All material representations and commitments made by the Applicant pursuant to the development proposal approvals as herein awarded, whether in public hearing or documentation presented before the Planning and Zoning Commission, are hereby incorporated in such site development approvals and the same shall be complied with as if fully set forth herein, unless amended by an authorized entity. Section 4: Existing Litigation This resolution shall not affect any existing litigation and shall not operate as an abatement of any action or proceeding now pending under or by virtue of the ordinances repealed or amended as herein provided, and the same shall be conducted and concluded under such prior ordinances. Section 5: Severability If any section, subsection, sentence, clause, phrase, or portion of this resolution is for any reason held invalid or unconstitutional in a court of competent jurisdiction, such portion shall be deemed a separate, distinct and independent provision and shall not affect the validity of the remaining portions thereof. APPROVED by the Commission at its meeting on March 15, 2022. APPROVED AS TO FORM: PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION: __________________________________ ________________________ Katharine Johnson, Assistant City Attorney Teraissa McGovern, Chair 13 P&Z Resolution # ____, Series of 2022 3 ATTEST: _____________________ Cindy Klob, Records Manager Attachment: Exhibit A-Denied site plans 14 1 Exhibit A –Special Review Staff Findings Chapter 26.430.040.B.3, Special Review No development subject to special review shall be permitted unless the Planning and Zoning Commission makes a determination that the proposed development complies with all standards and requirements set forth below.: (a)Dimensional requirements.Whenever the dimensional requirements of a proposed development are subject to special review, the development application shall only be approved if the following conditions are met. (1) The mass, height, density, configuration, amount of open space, landscaping and setbacks of the proposed development are designed in a manner which is compatible with or enhances the character of surrounding land uses and is consistent with the purposes of the underlying zone district. Staff Findings: The subject property is generally 20 to 30+% sloped. Development on properties this steeply sloped results in a reduction in allowable floor area in most zone districts. The Eastwood Subdivision was originally approved by Pitkin County and later annexed into the City of Aspen where it received specific R-15B zoning that did not include the application of floor area reduction for steep slopes. The subject home is close in proximity to the one on the northerly neighboring property. At the closest points, they are less than 20ft apart (as indicated by the blue line in the aerial photo below). Each home is required to have a 10’ rear yard setback. 15 2 The applicant is proposing to build a new garage structure in the existing parking area formerly excavated on the lot. The existing parking area is developed with a nonconforming retaining wall that exceeds the 30” retaining wall height limitation. The new garage structure would replace the nonconforming retaining wall, however as currently designed, the new garage requires a 5ft variance from the rear yard setback, encroaching into the separation that is anticipated between this development and it’s neighbor, and a 3ft variance from the front yard setback. Staff finds this criteria to not be met. (2) The applicant demonstrates that the proposed development will not have adverse impacts on surrounding uses or will mitigate those impacts, including but not limited to the effects of shading, excess traffic, availability of parking in the neighborhood or blocking of a designated view plane. Staff Findings: The subject property is a legally established nonconforming structure located in the R-15B zone district. The applicant proposes to reduce aspects of the nonconforming structure including eliminating the exterior stair located in the front yard, reducing the size of the deck located in the front yard and reconstructing a retaining wall in the rear yard so that it meets the 30” height restriction. On the other hand, the applicant proposes to expand the nonconforming structure up to 10ft further into the front yard. The existing structure is +/-155 sf into the front yard; the redesign proposes +/-243 sq.ft. of structure (an additional 88 sq.ft) of floor area into the front yard setback. Increasing gross square footage of the nonconformity into the front yard setback Is not consistent with the underlying zone district and no hardship is evident to support expansion of a nonconformity contrary to the underlying zone district standard. Reduction of nonconforming structures is a goal of the City, however reducing a non-conformity in one area of the property does not justify creating a non-conformity in another spot. (b) Replacement of nonconforming structures. Whenever a structure or portion thereof, which does not conform to the dimensional requirements of the zone district in which the property is located is proposed to be replaced after demolition, the following criteria shall be met: (1) The proposed development shall comply with the conditions of Subsection 26.430.040(a) above; (2) The are existing special characteristics unique to the property which differentiate the property from other properties located in the same zone district; (3) No dimensional variations are increased, and the replacement structure represents the minimum variance that will make possible the reasonable use of the property; and (4) Literal enforcement of the dimensional provisions of the zone district would cause unnecessary hardship upon the owner by prohibiting reasonable use of the property. Staff Findings: The entirety of the Eastwood Subdivision was annexed into the City at the same time with specific zoning considerations for the subdivision as noted in Section 26.710.070 R-15B Zone district. This zoning designation acknowledges the environmentally sensitive area and steep slopes of the subdivision. The applicant proposes to reduce some nonconforming elements and increase other dimensional variations. Reductions of nonconforming elements are the removal of the exterior stairs in the 16 3 front yard setback, reduction of the deck by 41 sq.ft. in the front yard setback, and reconstruction of a retaining wall to meet the 30” dimensional requirement in the rear yard. The applicant also proposes to increase nonconforming elements by expanding the structure with new living area that will sit 3 ft. into the front yard setback and by constructing a garage and second floor living space in a location that would require a 2ft variance from the rear yard setback. The particular design that the applicant has submitted reduces some aspects of the nonconforming structure but also enlarges the front façade in contrast to the goals of the land use code to reduce nonconformities (and require a variance from the front yard standard). Special Review of nonconforming structures requires critical review to regarding necessity of expansion of elements that do not meet dimensional requirements of the underlaying zone district. Buildable areas that meet the setback requirements are available for development not requiring variation from the underlying zoning standards. No hardships are evident in the request of these dimensional variations from the underlying zone district standards. The intent of the nonconformities section of the land use code is to reduce nonconformities and to avoid extensions. Staff finds this criteria to not be met. 17 Exhibit B - Variance Review Staff Findings Chapter 26.314, Variance A.In order to authorize a variance from the dimensional requirements of Title 26, the appropriate decision-making body shall make a finding that the following three (3) circumstances exist: 1. The grant of variance will be generally consistent with the purposes, goals, objectives and policies of this Title and the Municipal Code; and Staff Findings:The subject property is located in the Eastwood Subdivision which is within 60 feet of the Environmentally Sensitive 8040 Greenline. The structure existed prior to annexation into City limits 30+ years ago, in 1991. The City established a specific zone district when the Eastwood Subdivision was annexed, the R-15B zone, to acknowledge the environmentally sensitive conditions of this subdivision. Development in environmentally sensitive areas is subject to heightened review to reduce impacts on the natural watershed and reduce surface runoff, unstable slope, rockfall and mudslide. Disturbance to existing terrain and natural land features are to be kept to a minimum. Setback standards, limiting the building envelope, serve as a measure to protect environmentally sensitive areas. The subject property is a legally established nonconforming structure. The existing nonconformities include: +/-155 sq.ft. of the structure located in the front yard setback +/- 244 sq.ft. of deck located in the front yard setback +/-10 ft of the back of the building located in the rear yard setback Grading/a retaining wall (in the rear yard surrounding the parking area) measuring above the 30” limitation The property was originally developed under Pitkin County land use regulations, and later annexed into the City of Aspen in the 1990s. At that time the front lot line was relocated 15ft into the subject lot for road maintenance, reducing the gross area of this linear lot and moving the front yard setback closer to the existing structure. The subject lot is 14,858 sq.ft., the buildable area within the current setbacks is 19ft in depth by +/-280ft in length or approximately 5,342 sq.ft. The applicant views this as a hardship. The applicant requests a 9.5 ft variance to the front yard setback requirement to expand the front façade an additional +/-88 sq.ft. of structure into the front yard setback. The applicant requests a 2 ft variance to the rear yard setback, and a 3 ft variance to the front yard setback requirement to build a garage on the existing parking area of the property. The proposed garage would replace the nonconforming grading and retraining wall. The property was annexed into the City 30 years ago, at which time the front property line was moved and the zoning requirements changed from County standards to City standards. The City regulation and former lot line adjustment of the property is not considered a hardship as the City made concessions with the Eastwood Subdivision at the time of annexation to allow for development on steeply sloped lots in the 8040 Greenline environmentally sensitive area without requiring future 8040 Greenline review and allowing for the entirety of each lot to used in determining the allowable floor area to be constructed on a lot. These are exceptional standards 18 the City has applied to properties in the Eastwood Subdivision. Typically, areas of a lot sloped at or above 20% grade are not allowed to be included in floor area calculations reducing the size of an allowed structure on a steeply sloped property. Subject property 8040 Greenline 19 The City negotiated standards for the Eastwood Subdivision during annexation. Approval of variations to the setback standards is inconsistent with the City’s goal to reduce environmental impacts of development in this subdivision. Staff finds this criterion to not be met. 2. The grant of variance is the minimum variance that will make possible the reasonable use of the parcel, building or structure; and Staff Findings: The applicant proposes to reduce the nonconforming structure by removing the exterior stairs located in the front yard setback and reducing the deck by 41 sq.ft. from the front yard setback. The applicant also proposes to expand the nonconforming structure further into the front yard by 88 sq.ft. There is not a demonstrated hardship such that an addition to the existing structure could not be constructed within the R-15B zone dimensional requirements. The subject property is located in an environmentally sensitive area, expansion outside of the underlying zone dimensional requirements is not encouraged. The applicant also proposes to construct a garage in the existing parking area and is requesting a 2 ft. variance in the rear yard to accommodate the proposed design. There is not a demonstrated hardship that necessitates the rear yard variance into the environmentally sensitive area at a 30% slope. Staff finds this criterion to not be met. 3. Literal interpretation and enforcement of the terms and provisions of this Title would deprive the applicant of rights commonly enjoyed by other parcels in the same zone district and would cause the applicant unnecessary hardship, as distinguished from mere inconvenience. In determining whether an applicant's rights would be deprived, the Board shall consider whether either of the following conditions apply: a. There are special conditions and circumstances which are unique to the parcel, building or structure, which are not applicable to other parcels, structures or buildings in the same zone district and which do not result from the actions of the applicant; or b. Granting the variance will not confer upon the applicant any special privilege denied the terms of this Title and the Municipal Code to other parcels, buildings or structures, in the same zone district. Staff Findings:The entirety of the Eastwood Subdivision was annexed into the City of Aspen approximately 30 years ago. The designated R15-B zone district specifically addresses the character of the Eastwood Subdivision with unique allowances for these lots, i.e. the entirety of steep slopes is allowed to be calculated toward floor area allowance (in all other zone districts steep slopes are reduced from calculations of floor area allowance). The specific zone district applied to the subject property is intended to reduce impacts of development in an environmentally sensitive area while allowing development rights within the designated dimensional requirements. Granting of dimensional variances to the front and rear yards without a demonstrated hardship is not a consistent application of the land use code and would confer a special privilege to the subject property. Staff finds this criterion to not be met. 20 501 E. Hyman Ave, Suite 205 | Aspen, Colorado | 81611 | 970.925.2252 November 16, 2021 Garrett Larimer City Planner City of Aspen Community Development Department 130 S Galena Street, 3rd Floor Aspen, CO 81611 RE: 191 Eastwood Lot 24 Eastwood Subdivision Parcel ID: 273718120018 Dear Garrett, Thank you for your time and assistance with this application to seek setback variances, the ability to continue an existing non-conformity and to memorialize the pre- development topography for the establishment of “natural grade” from the Planning and Zoning Commission. When this home was built, the subdivision was in the County and the home was within all the setback requirements at that time. At some point the subdivision was annexed into the City, and it was negotiated that the City would take over the ownership and maintenance of the road. At that time, in 1991, the property lines were moved from the center of the road to the edge of the roadway, which in turn moved the 30’ setback much further into the property; in fact, 15 feet further into the property. This resulted in an extremely shallow building envelope and created what are now encroachments into the front yard setback. Looking at the plat, it is seen that all of the lots were affected differently; some more adversely than others with this adjustment. Lot 24 is oriented lengthwise or parallel to the road and, for whatever reason, was already shallower than the other lots along the road; thus this 15’ move has a tremendous impact on the usability of the area of this property. Please see the attached documents which demonstrate the different aspects of how this property line adjustment affected Lot 24 so negatively: Exhibit A Plat of Eastwood Subdivision Exhibit B Illustrations of Front Yard Setback Adjustment Exhibit C Floor Plans of Existing & Proposed Residence w/ Site Plans Exhibit D Zoning Summary for R-15B and Floor Area Calculations Exhibit E Photos of the Site / Existing Conditions Exhibit A: Shows the dimensions and orientation of the lots along the road; and how this 15’ shift encroaches significantly into this property along the long axis. 21 501 E. Hyman Ave, Suite 205 | Aspen, Colorado | 81611 | 970.925.2252 Exhibit B, you will see that the amount of allowed building area was reduced by 3000 sq. ft. by removing 15’x200’ (the length of building area between side yard setbacks). Beyond this loss of buildable area, the building envelope becomes extremely shallow when the front and rear yard setbacks are deducted from the depth of the property after the adjustment. 59’-10” – (10’ rear + 30’ front setbacks) = 19’-10”. This is very shallow for a lot of this size and in this neighborhood. Looking further into this, when the home was built under County regulations, it was within the setbacks, and there was room for expansion. A big part of our hardship now is that the home is already built and oriented / designed such that adding a garage just doesn’t quite fit, as the depth of the building envelope is not deep enough for a garage at 19 feet. It is only a small corner of the building that needs to protrude into the rear setback to allow for a full depth garage and a corner of a roof overhang to keep the snow from piling up in front of the garage doors. The proposed addition is designed to have the foundation replace the existing rip rap boulder wall and railroad tie retaining wall, with very little additional disturbance to the lot. In fact, the disturbed area will be cleaned up and filled in around the new foundation, lessening the impact of the grading outside the setback that is over 30”. Exhibit C, in the proposed floor plan, the new garage is added to the west end of the home where the landscape is already disturbed and uses the existing driveway and parking area. The design is sensitive to the surrounding neighborhood by disturbing the least amount of the surrounding forest and natural vegetation, minimizing the negative impact of the unsightly rip rap wall. The proposed remodel removes the large, unsightly exterior staircase from the upper deck to the yard below and proposes to cut the existing deck back 18”; which are both existing non-conformities outside the setback. Both measures help reduce the existing non-conformity. Exhibit E: See photos of site to see the stairs to be removed and the existing retaining walls to be removed and the deck that will be smaller when rebuilt. The proposed Site Plan shows how we are working the new garage to encroach very slightly on the rear yard and a bit into the front yard setback. To allow enough space for ingress and egress from the garage, the back corner of the garage is 2’-8 3/8” into the rear yard setback, decreasing in encroachment along the back of the garage; at the front of the garage, the overhang to keep the snow from piling up in front of the garage is encroaching, also on an angle, by a similar amount. As can be seen, the building envelope as defined by the current setbacks (front and rear) is not deep enough for a garage. In this design, we feel like the impact to the neighbors and the neighborhood are minimized with the new small encroachments, where there is already a larger encroachment. The existing natural vegetation will also be maintained. They are also benefited by the exterior stair removal and cutting the existing deck back 23”. The proposed remodel of this home results in less impact on the neighborhood than what is existing now and allows the property to be used as was initially planned/platted, with a larger depth of usable area. 22 501 E. Hyman Ave, Suite 205 | Aspen, Colorado | 81611 | 970.925.2252 RELEVANT LAND USE CODE SECTIONS SECTION 26.304 1. Please see attached letter of authorization from Chris Warner, the manager of Jade Peak 2, LLC; granting Kim Raymond Architecture + Interiors, authority to act on his behalf throughout this process. 2. Please see the attached Vicinity Map with a legal description 3. Please see the attached Title Insurance, Schedule A & B for proof of ownership. 4. Please see attached Site Plan 5. Please see the current survey of the property located at 191 Eastwood. 6. Interpolated grade survey showing historic grade at 191 Eastwood. 7. Please also find attached all the forms for this Land Use Application. 8. Please see the list of homeowners within the 300’ radius. 9. Please see below, the description and summary of all requested information pertaining to the Land Use Code sections regarding the proposed development. Additionally, please find a copy of the Pre-application Conference Summary sheet, attached at the end of this packet of information. This application package includes all requested documents as outlined by Garrett Larimer in the letter dated 10.25.21. SECTION 26.310.60 We will provide the posting and mailing to all the property owners within the 300’ radius of this parcel. The posting and mailing will happen at least 15 days prior to the hearing. The list of property owners is attached. SECTION 26.312 Non-Conformities It is the intent of this Chapter to permit nonconformities to continue, but not to allow nonconformities to be enlarged or expanded. The provisions of this Chapter are designed to curtail substantial investment in nonconformities in order to preserve the integrity of the zone districts and the other provisions of this Title but should not be construed as an abatement provision. As has been described above, this entire structure was built within the setbacks when it was constructed. It is due to the revised setback lines when the neighborhood was annexed into the City that created the non-conformities. This section of the LUC provides for such nonconformities to remain, be repaired and maintained. It is our intention to bring this entire building into compliance by going through this process to document and memorialize the existing non-conformities. Exhibit D shows the extents of existing non-conformities and how we are reducing the non-conformities along the front yard by removing a large exterior staircase and reducing the size of the deck by nearly 40 square feet, by pulling the front of it back 23” towards the house. SECTION 26.314 Variances Variances are reviewed on a case-by-case basis as each lot is so unique. The provision of granting variances is to help alleviate circumstances created or existing that adversely impact a property, putting undue and unnecessary hardship on the lot. As explained above and illustrated in Exhibit B, we would like to establish a new 23 501 E. Hyman Ave, Suite 205 | Aspen, Colorado | 81611 | 970.925.2252 building envelope or different setback lines. SECTION 26.314.040 Standards applicable to variances To receive a variance there are three standards that are required to be met: 1. The variance will be generally consistent with the purposes, goals and objectives of the Municipal Code. We meet this standard as the request is consistent with the rest of the requirements of the R-15B zone district; a single family home. It is also consistent, as the original plat allowed 15’ of additional area in the front yard. It was a change in ownership of the road that has caused this issue. The small variance being requested is very small in consideration to what this lot lost in the setback adjustments. 2. The grant of the variance is the minimal needed to make reasonable use of the property and building. We meet this standard as we are asking for just the amount of variance that we need to do this modest addition to an existing home with existing non-conforming encroachments. Please see Exhibit D, showing a defined area of setback variance that will be easily and clearly definable on a plat and in the field by the surveyor. 3. Literal interpretation and enforcement of the terms deprive the applicant of rights enjoyed by other parcels in the same zone district; and would cause unnecessary hardship as distinguished from mere inconvenience to the applicant. One of two conditions must apply: a. There are special conditions and circumstances which are unique to the parcel which are not applicable to other parcels in the same zone district, and which do not result from the actions of the applicant. There are special conditions and circumstances in the case of this parcel. As mentioned above, the front yard setback was adjusted in 1991 when the City took over the ownership and maintenance of the Eastwood Subdivision Road. The fact that this lot was already shallow, the resulting 15’ reduction in buildable area along the front yard (removing 3368 sq. ft of area within the setbacks and 3803 sq. ft of the size of the parcel); the resulting depth of building area is too shallow to accommodate a reasonable garage. This front yard setback adjustment resulted in substantial encroachments of the existing building. This variance will bring this part of the building into compliance and allow for the construction of a garage with very small encroachments into both the front and rear setbacks. b. The granting of this variance will not confer upon this parcel any special privilege. The granting of this variance will not confer any special privilege, it will allow the applicant to have the same reasonable use of property as enjoyed by the other parcels in the zone district. As seen on Exhibit A, Lot 24 on Eastwood Drive was the most severely affected by the new setbacks. Only a couple of lots are oriented parallel to the road, instead of perpendicular, the new setbacks had a very substantial negative impact that the other lots do not have to endure. Lot 24 was plated almost 20’ narrower than Lot 23 which is also parallel. The other standards that are required: 1. Public notice by posting and mailing will be done by applicant, and the City will put a publication in the local paper. 2. A variance is the only way to restore to this lot what was taken from it when 24 501 E. Hyman Ave, Suite 205 | Aspen, Colorado | 81611 | 970.925.2252 the City of Aspen took over ownership and automatically the setbacks were changed, due to no fault or reason of the applicant. The small variance being asked for, doesn’t restore all of the area that was lost, but allows the applicant to build a garage with the least impact to the neighborhood and the natural surroundings. The grading that would be needed to make a driveway work if it were to be oriented parallel to the street, would require an even larger setback variance as the grade would have to be altered much more than 30” outside the setback lines. With the proposed orientation, the existing driveway and grading will be used and the additional grading outside the existing is minimal and less than 30”. 3–5. There will be no need for off-site storage or work, so these do not apply. SECTION 26.430.040.A & B Special Review This section needs to be addressed for both the request for the continuance of the existing non-conformities and for the memorialization of pre-development grades. The existing topography has already been altered significantly where the addition is proposed, so the height measurement is skewed. As the existing and proposed parts of the home run parallel with the topography, it is logical to use the interpolated grade to establish roof heights that are compatible with the existing building and original grades. Please see the survey with interpolated grade shown. This shows how much the natural grade has been adjusted. Section 26.430.040 a.1 The proposed addition to this home meets these criteria as it is designed in a manner that is compatible with the character of the existing home, and the surrounding land. By continuing the length of the home in alignment with the topography and the very narrow building envelop, the home fits into the landscape and doesn’t disturb the surrounding forest and vegetation, as this area was disturbed originally when the home was built. The extent of this grading will be minimalized with the proposed home filling in a portion of that large disturbance, and the rest will be filled back in around the new foundation. The result will be a net loss of development outside the setback line. (The current rip rap wall is well above the allowed 30”) The proposed home will actually enhance the look of the lot and the character of the neighborhood. Please see the photos on Exhibit F Section 26.430.040 a.2 There will be no adverse impact on the surrounding uses; but the proposed will mitigate the adverse excavation and rip rap boulder wall that was built with the original home; enhancing the character of the neighborhood. There will be no negative impacts to the neighbors or neighborhood; there will be no additional traffic to the home, no need for addition parking, there will be no view plans affected and no ill effects from shading, as the shading from the addition will fall on our lot. Section 26.430.040 b The proposed remodel of the home does not include demolition of any part of the building. For sure there are some funky things that will be addressed in bringing the home into today’s standards of energy efficiency and modern living, but this will be accomplished by remodeling the existing building, not demolishing it. The existing large deck that is mostly outside the current setback line needs to be rebuilt, as it is not safe at this point. We are proposing the removal of the existing exterior stair and 23” of depth of the existing deck and reconstruction of a sound, safe 25 501 E. Hyman Ave, Suite 205 | Aspen, Colorado | 81611 | 970.925.2252 deck 41 sq ft smaller than the original. We are requesting the approval for this with this application. Section 26.430.040 b.1 Please see the section above to see how we are complying with this standard. Section 26.430.040 b.2 As previously described the adjustment of the front yard setback had adverse impacts to this lot as it runs parallel to the street and was the shallowest lot to begin with in the subdivision. Please see the original Plat. By the front yard setback moving 15’ closer to the rear setback, the lot is left with only 19’ of depth between setback lines. No other lot on the street was as adversely affected as this one. We are not asking for special privileges, just reasonable use of the lot. Section 26.430.040 b.3 The dimensional variations to the existing structure are not being increased with this proposal. In fact, we are removing the stairs and part of the deck that are outside the current setback lines. The remodeled structure will have the need for a smaller variance than what currently exists. Please see photos on Exhibit F. The addition of the garage and bedroom do need a variance as has been described above. The variance being sought is very minimal; the minimal needed to make reasonable use of the property, using the existing disturbance to save the undisturbed natural vegetation. Section 26.430.040 b.4 The literal enforcements to the dimensional requirements on this lot will create a hardship on the owners, as they would have to destroy a large area of natural vegetation on the lot to create a driveway to a garage that would be oriented in line with the topography. This would not only be an adverse impact for the owners but would adversely affect the neighborhood. The much larger extent of hardscape and cutting down so many aspen trees and other natural vegetation would have a very negative impact on the character of this special area. The small variance to fit this addition onto the lot would not be needed at all if the front yard setback had not been adjusted back 15’. The small area of setback is a tiny fraction of what was taken from this lot. The new land area with the adjustment from the setback went down to 5342 sq. ft. from 8710 sq. ft. A difference of 3368 sq. ft. The amount of area being requested to fit the garage is 50 sq. ft; less than 1.5% of what was lost. The front yard setback variance for the addition is for the roof overhang. And the small area of setback variance at the existing structure is so we can add a roof overhang to help shade the large windows: it is for energy efficiency in cooling. SECTION 26.575.020 Calculations and Measurements The proposed development meets all the requirements and restrictions of the calculations and measurements section of this code; except for the variances that are being sought with this application for the front and rear yard setbacks. Please see the attached Site plan, floor plans, elevations and FAR calculations. SECTION 26.710.070 R-15B Medium Density Residential Zone District 26 501 E. Hyman Ave, Suite 205 | Aspen, Colorado | 81611 | 970.925.2252 Please see Exhibit E for Zoning Summary and Exhibit D for floor area calcs. SUMMARY We believe that this application meets all the criteria to be granted the three requests: 1. Setback variances to the front and rear yard setbacks as depicted on the proposed Site Plan, 2. The memorialization of the original or pre-development grade, and 3. The documentation of the existing non-conformities as depicted on the Floor Plans and Site Plan, to allow for repair, remodel and restoration. The hardship is the result of the unique and unusual circumstances where the parcel was originated in the County and when the City took over ownership and maintenance of the road through the subdivision, this lot was impacted so severely; loosing 3368 sq. ft. of buildable area. Also, this parcel will not be gaining any special privilege as a result of being granted this variance and the neighborhood will benefit from the removal of the exterior stairs and part of the deck that are now encroaching significantly into the front yard setback. The existing rip rap wall will be removed that is significantly outside the setback and part of that already disturbed area will be used for the new construction. This will be in line with the uses and purpose of this zone district. Thank you in advance for your good and reasonable consideration and approval of the requested setback variances for this project. Respectfully yours, Kim Raymond Kim Raymond AIA Kim Raymond Architecture + Interiors 27 28 191 Eastwood Drive – Location Map Within the City of Aspen 29 711 E. Valley Rd, Unit 201B Basalt, CO 81621 Phone: 970-366-4111 Fax: 970-672-1576 www.titlecorockies.com Commitment Ordered By: Mandy Welgos Aspen Snowmass Sotheby's International Realty 415 E. Hyman Avenue Aspen, CO 81611 Phone: 970-925-6060 Fax: email: mandy.welgos@sothebysrealty.com; Crystal.Jones@SIR.com Inquiries should be directed to: Kate Staskauskas Title Company of the Rockies 711 E. Valley Rd, Unit 201B Basalt, CO 81621 Phone: 970-366-4111 Fax: 970-672-1576 email: KateS@titlecorockies.com Commitment Number:7000657-C5 Buyer's Name(s):Jade Peak 2, LLC, a Colorado limited liability company Seller's Name(s):Gada 777 Revocable Living Trust Property:191 Eastwood Drive, Aspen, CO 81611 Eastwood Subdivision, Lot 24, Pitkin County, CO TITLE CHARGES These charges are based on issuance of the policy or policies described in the attached Commitment for Title Insurance, and includes premiums for the proposed coverage amount(s) and endorsement(s) referred to therein, and may also include additional work and/or third party charges related thereto. If applicable, the designation of “Buyer” and “Seller” shown below may be based on traditional settlement practices in Pitkin County, Colorado, and/or certain terms of any contract, or other information provided with the Application for Title Insurance. Owner’s Policy Premium: Loan Policy Premium: Additional Lender Charge(s): Additional Other Charge(s): Tax Certificate: Total Endorsement Charge(s): TBD Charge(s): TOTAL CHARGES: $7,593.00 $0.00 $25.00 $65.00 $7,708.00 Service Beyond Expectation in Colorado for: Eagle, Garfield, Grand, Pitkin and Summit Counties. (Limited Coverage: Jackson, Lake, Park and Routt Counties) Locations In: Avon/Beaver Creek, Basalt, Breckenridge, Grand Lake and Winter Park. (Closing Services available in Aspen and Glenwood Springs). 30 ALTA Commitment (6-17-06) ALTA Commitment Form COMMITMENT FOR TITLE INSURANCE Stewart Title Guaranty Company, a Texas Corporation ("Company"), for a valuable consideration, commits to issue its policy or policies of title insurance, as identified in Schedule A, in favor of the Proposed Insured named in Schedule A, as owner or mortgagee of the estate or interest in the land described or referred to in Schedule A, upon payment of the premiums and charges and compliance with the Requirements; all subject to the provisions of Schedules A and B and to the Conditions of this Commitment. This Commitment shall be effective only when the identity of the Proposed Insured and the amount of the policy or policies committed for have been inserted in Schedule A by the Company. All liability and obligation under this Commitment shall cease and terminate 6 months after the Effective Date or when the policy or policies committed for shall issue, whichever first occurs, provided that the failure to issue such policy or policies is not the fault of the Company. The Company will provide a sample of the policy form upon request. This commitment shall not be valid or binding until countersigned by a validating officer or authorized signatory. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, Stewart Title Guaranty Company has caused its corporate name and seal to be affixed by its duly authorized officers on the date shown in Schedule A. 004-UN ALTA Commitment (6-17-06) Issued by: 711 E. Valley Rd, Unit 201B Basalt, CO 81621 Authorized Agent 31 CONDITIONS The term mortgage, when used herein, shall include deed of trust, trust deed, or other security1. instrument. If the proposed Insured has or acquired actual knowledge of any defect, lien, encumbrance, adverse2. claim or other matter affecting the estate or interest or mortgage thereon covered by this Commitment other than those shown in Schedule B hereof, and shall fail to disclose such knowledge to the Company in writing, the Company shall be relieved from liability for any loss or damage resulting from any act of reliance hereon to the extent the Company is prejudiced by failure to so disclose such knowledge. If the proposed Insured shall disclose such knowledge to the Company, or if the Company otherwise acquires actual knowledge of any such defect, lien, encumbrance, adverse claim or other matter, the Company at its option may amend Schedule B of this Commitment accordingly, but such amendment shall not relieve the Company from liability previously incurred pursuant to paragraph 3 of these Conditions and Stipulations. Liability of the Company under this Commitment shall be only to the named proposed Insured and3. such parties included under the definition of Insured in the form of policy or policies committed for and only for actual loss incurred in reliance hereon in undertaking in good faith (a) to comply with the requirements hereof, or (b) to eliminate exceptions shown in Schedule B, or (c) to acquire or create the estate or interest or mortgage thereon covered by this Commitment. In no event shall such liability exceed the amount stated in Schedule A for the policy or policies committed for and such liability is subject to the insuring provisions and Conditions and Stipulations and the Exclusions from Coverage of the form of policy or policies committed for in favor of the proposed Insured which are hereby incorporated by reference and are made a part of this Commitment except as expressly modified herein. This Commitment is a contract to issue one or more title insurance policies and is not an abstract of4. title or a report of the condition of title. Any action or actions or rights of action that the proposed Insured may have or may bring against the Company arising out of the status of the title to the estate or interest or the status of the mortgage thereon covered by this Commitment must be based on and are subject to the provisions of this Commitment. The policy to be issued contains an arbitration clause. All arbitrable matters when the Amount of5. Insurance is $2,000,000 or less shall be arbitrated at the option of either the Company or the Insured as the exclusive remedy of the parties. You may review a copy of the arbitration rules at< http://www.alta.org/>. 32 COMMITMENT FOR TITLE INSURANCE Issued by as agent for Stewart Title Guaranty Company SCHEDULE A Reference:Commitment Number: 7000657-C5 1.Effective Date: May 07, 2021, 7:00 am Issue Date: May 24, 2021 2.Policy (or Policies) to be issued: ALTA Owner's Policy (6-17-06)Policy Amount:$4,350,000.00 Premium:$7,683.00 Proposed Insured:Jade Peak 2, LLC, a Colorado limited liability company 3.The estate or interest in the land described or referred to in this Commitment is Fee Simple. 4.The Title is, at the Commitment Date, vested in: Gada 777 Revocable Living Trust 5.The land referred to in this Commitment is described as follows: FOR LEGAL DESCRIPTION SEE SCHEDULE A CONTINUED ON NEXT PAGE For Informational Purposes Only - APN: R004110 Countersigned Title Company of the Rockies, LLC By: Kurt Beereboom This page is only a part of a 2016 ALTA ® Commitment for Title Insurance issued by Stewart Title Guaranty Company. This Commitment is not valid without the Notice; the Commitment to Issue Policy; the Commitment Conditions; Schedule A; Schedule B, Part I-Requirements; and Schedule B, Part II-Exceptions. Copyright 2006-2016 American Land Title Association. All rights reserved. The use of this Form (or any derivative thereof) is restricted to ALTA licensees and ALTA members in good standing as of the date of use. All other uses are prohibited. Reprinted under license from the American Land Title Association. Commitment for Title Insurance (8-1-2016) Technical Correction 4-2-2018 Schedule A Page 1 33 Commitment No: 7000657-C5 SCHEDULE A (continued) LEGAL DESCRIPTION The Land referred to herein is located in the County of Pitkin, State of Colorado, and described as follows: Lot 24, EASTWOOD SUBDIVISION, according to the plat thereof recorded June 23, 1969 in Plat Book 4 at Page 4 as Reception No. 135881 and Amendment No. 2 recorded August 30, 1991 in Plat Book 27 at Page 37 as Reception No. 336038. COUNTY OF PITKIN, STATE OF COLORADO. This page is only a part of a 2016 ALTA ® Commitment for Title Insurance issued by Stewart Title Guaranty Company. This Commitment is not valid without the Notice; the Commitment to Issue Policy; the Commitment Conditions; Schedule A; Schedule B, Part I-Requirements; and Schedule B, Part II-Exceptions. Copyright 2006-2016 American Land Title Association. All rights reserved. The use of this Form (or any derivative thereof) is restricted to ALTA licensees and ALTA members in good standing as of the date of use. All other uses are prohibited. Reprinted under license from the American Land Title Association. Commitment for Title Insurance (8-1-2016) Technical Correction 4-2-2018 Schedule A Page 2 34 Commitment No: 7000657-C5 COMMITMENT FOR TITLE INSURANCE Issued by Stewart Title Guaranty Company SCHEDULE B, PART I Requirements All of the following Requirements must be met: 1.The Proposed Insured must notify the Company in writing of the name of any party not referred to in this Commitment who will obtain an interest in the Land or who will make a loan on the Land. The Company may then make additional Requirements or Exceptions. 2.Pay the agreed amount for the estate or interest to be insured. 3.Pay the premiums, fees, and charges for the Policy to the Company. 4.Documents satisfactory to the Company that convey the Title or create the Mortgage to be insured, or both, must be properly authorized, executed, delivered, and recorded in the Public Records. Evidence satisfactory to the Company or its duly authorized agent either (a) that the "real estate5. transfer taxes" imposed by Ordinance No. 20 (Series of 1979), and by Ordinance No. 13, (Series of 1990), of the City of Aspen, Colorado have been paid, and that the liens imposed thereby have been fully satisfied, or (b) that Certificates of Exemption have been issued pursuant to the provisions thereof. An Improvement Survey Plat prepared by a registered Colorado Surveyor, within the last 26. months. Title Company of the Rockies reserves the right to take exception to any adverse matters as shown on said survey, or make further inquiry or requirements relative thereto. Said survey must be certified to Title Company of the Rockies and the Buyer. Statement of Authority for Gada 777 Revocable Living Trust, a Colorado trust, evidencing the7. existence of said trust and the authority of one or more trustees to act on behalf of said trust and otherwise complying with C.R.S. 38-30-108.5, et. seq. NOTE: Review Trust Agreement for authority of party(ies) to act on behalf of said trust and complete the transaction contemplated herein. This page is only a part of a 2016 ALTA ® Commitment for Title Insurance issued by Stewart Title Guaranty Company. This Commitment is not valid without the Notice; the Commitment to Issue Policy; the Commitment Conditions; Schedule A; Schedule B, Part I-Requirements; and Schedule B, Part II-Exceptions. Copyright 2006-2016 American Land Title Association. All rights reserved. The use of this Form (or any derivative thereof) is restricted to ALTA licensees and ALTA members in good standing as of the date of use. All other uses are prohibited. Reprinted under license from the American Land Title Association. Commitment for Title Insurance (8-1-2016) Technical Correction 4-2-2018 Schedule B - Part I Page 3 35 Commitment No: 7000657-C5 Resolution or Statement of Authority by Jade Peak 2, LLC, a Colorado limited liability company,8. authorizing the transaction, executed by the managers or members set forth in the Operating Agreement. NOTE: Review Operating Agreement for authority of party(ies) to act on behalf of said limited liability company and complete the transaction contemplated herein. Release by the Public Trustee of Pitkin County of the Deed of Trust from Dale Dillingham and 9. Gabriella Bursten for the use of Chase Manhattan Personal Financial Services, Inc., to secure $429,000.00, dated September 1, 1994, and recorded 09/07/1994 as Reception No. 373963 . Release by the Public Trustee of Pitkin County of the Deed of Trust from Dale Dillingham for the 10. use of Gabriella Bursten, to secure $212,500.00 and 162,500.00, dated August 26, 2003, and recorded 08/29/2003 as Reception No. 487698 and rerecorded 09/17/2003 as Reception No. 488533. Deed from Gada 777 Revocable Living Trust to Jade Peak 2, LLC, a Colorado limited liability11. company. NOTE: Duly executed real property transfer declaration, executed by either the Grantor or Grantee, to accompany the Deed mentioned above, pursuant to Article 14 of House Bill No. 1288-CRA 39-14-102. Evidence satisfactory to the Company or its duly authorized agent that all dues and/or12. assessments levied by the Homeowners Association have been paid through the date of closing. NOTE: EXCEPTION NO. 5 UNDER SCHEDULE B, SECTION 2 OF THIS COMMITMENT WILL NOT APPEAR IN THE POLICY OR POLICIES TO BE ISSUED PURSUANT HERETO, PROVIDED THAT (A) THE DOCUMENTS CONTEMPLATED BY THE REQUIREMENTS SET FORTH IN SCHEDULE B, SECTION 1 OF THIS COMMITMENT ARE SUBMITTED TO AND APPROVED AND RECORDED BY THE COMPANY OR ITS DULY AUTHORIZED AGENT, AND (B) AN EXAMINATION OF THE RECORDS IN THE OFFICE OF THE CLERK AND RECORDER FOR PITKIN COUNTY, COLORADO BY THE COMPANY OR ITS DULY AUTHORIZED AGENT DISCLOSES THAT NO DEFECTS, LIENS, ENCUMBRANCES, ADVERSE CLAIMS OR OTHER MATTERS HAVE BEEN RECORDED IN SUCH RECORDS SUBSEQUENT TO THE EFFECTIVE DATE HEREOF. The Owner's Policy, when issued, will not contain Exceptions No. 1, 2, 3 and 4 provided that: (A) The enclosed form, of indemnity agreement or final affidavit and agreement is properly This page is only a part of a 2016 ALTA ® Commitment for Title Insurance issued by Stewart Title Guaranty Company. This Commitment is not valid without the Notice; the Commitment to Issue Policy; the Commitment Conditions; Schedule A; Schedule B, Part I-Requirements; and Schedule B, Part II-Exceptions. Copyright 2006-2016 American Land Title Association. All rights reserved. The use of this Form (or any derivative thereof) is restricted to ALTA licensees and ALTA members in good standing as of the date of use. All other uses are prohibited. Reprinted under license from the American Land Title Association. Commitment for Title Insurance (8-1-2016) Technical Correction 4-2-2018 Schedule B - Part I - continued Page 4 36 Commitment No: 7000657-C5 executed and acknowledged by the party(ies) indicated and returned to the Company or its duly authorized agent, and (B) The applicable scheduled charges in the amount of $65.00, are paid to the Company or its duly authorized agent. Upon receipt of evidence that taxes and assessments for the year 2020 have been paid, Exception No. 6 under Schedule B, Section II of this commitment will be amended in the policy or policies to be issued pursuant hereto, to read “Taxes and Assessments for the year 2021 and subsequent years, a lien, not yet due or payable". 24-Month Chain of Title: The only conveyance(s) affecting said land recorded within the 24 months preceding the date of this commitment is (are) as follows: Quit Claim Deed recorded 08/15/2014 as Reception No. 612643 NOTE: If no conveyances were found in that 24 month period, the last recorded conveyance is reported. If the subject land is a lot in a subdivision plat less than 24 months old, only the conveyances subsequent to the plat are reported. This page is only a part of a 2016 ALTA ® Commitment for Title Insurance issued by Stewart Title Guaranty Company. This Commitment is not valid without the Notice; the Commitment to Issue Policy; the Commitment Conditions; Schedule A; Schedule B, Part I-Requirements; and Schedule B, Part II-Exceptions. Copyright 2006-2016 American Land Title Association. All rights reserved. The use of this Form (or any derivative thereof) is restricted to ALTA licensees and ALTA members in good standing as of the date of use. All other uses are prohibited. Reprinted under license from the American Land Title Association. Commitment for Title Insurance (8-1-2016) Technical Correction 4-2-2018 Schedule B - Part I - continued Page 5 37 Commitment No: 7000657-C5 SCHEDULE B, PART II Exceptions THIS COMMITMENT DOES NOT REPUBLISH ANY COVENANT, CONDITION, RESTRICTION, OR LIMITATION CONTAINED IN ANY DOCUMENT REFERRED TO IN THIS COMMITMENT TO THE EXTENT THAT THE SPECIFIC COVENANT, CONDITION, RESTRICTION, OR LIMITATION VIOLATES STATE OR FEDERAL LAW BASED ON RACE, COLOR, RELIGION, SEX, SEXUAL ORIENTATION, GENDER IDENTITY, HANDICAP, FAMILIAL STATUS, OR NATIONAL ORIGIN. Schedule B of the policy or policies to be issued will contain exceptions to the following matters unless the same are disposed of to the satisfaction of the Company. Any loss or damage, including attorney fees, by reason of the matters shown below: Any facts, right, interests, or claims which are not shown by the Public Records but which could1. be ascertained by an inspection of said Land or by making inquiry of persons in possession thereof. Easements or claims of easements, not shown by the Public Records.2. Any encroachment, encumbrance, violation, variation, or adverse circumstance affecting the3. Title that would be disclosed by an accurate and complete land survey of the Land. 4. Any lien, or right to a lien for services, labor or material heretofore or hereafter furnished, imposed by law and not shown by the Public Records. 5. Defects, liens, encumbrances, adverse claims or other matters, if any created, first appearing in the Public Records or attaching subsequent to the effective date hereof, but prior to the date of the proposed insured acquires of record for value the estate or interest or mortgage thereon covered by this Commitment. 6. (a) Taxes or assessments that are not shown as existing liens by the records of any taxing authority that levies taxes or assessments on real property or by the Public Records; (b) proceedings by a public agency that may result in taxes or assessments, or notices of such proceedings, whether or not shown by the records of such agency or by the Public Records. The effect of inclusions in any general or specific water conservancy, fire protection, soil7. conservation or other district or inclusion in any water service or street improvement area. Right of way for ditches or canals constructed by the authority of the United States as reserved in8. United States Patent recorded December 14, 1911 in Book 55 at Page 196. This page is only a part of a 2016 ALTA ® Commitment for Title Insurance issued by Stewart Title Guaranty Company. This Commitment is not valid without the Notice; the Commitment to Issue Policy; the Commitment Conditions; Schedule A; Schedule B, Part I-Requirements; and Schedule B, Part II-Exceptions. Copyright 2006-2016 American Land Title Association. All rights reserved. The use of this Form (or any derivative thereof) is restricted to ALTA licensees and ALTA members in good standing as of the date of use. All other uses are prohibited. Reprinted under license from the American Land Title Association. Commitment for Title Insurance (8-1-2016) Technical Correction 4-2-2018 Schedule B - Part II Page 6 38 Commitment No: 7000657-C5 Easement for Eastwood Road as shown on the recorded plat of said subdivision as reserved in the9. recorded plat of said subdivision and in instrument recorded June 23, 1969 in Book 241 at Page 704, and easement rights granted in Eastwood Road by instrument recorded May 10, 1971 in Book 255 at Page 219. Protective Covenants for Eastwood Subdivision recorded June 23, 1969 in Book 241 at Page 704,10. and Amendments recorded July 29, 1969 in Book 242 at Page 449, recorded April 6, 1970 in Book 247 at Page 844 and Extension of Protective Covenants recorded March 15, 1990 in Book 616 at Page 85, and amended by Modification of Protective Covenants recorded February 26, 1999 as Reception No. 428172 and Modification recorded July 12, 2005 as Reception No. 512311. Set-back restrictions as shown on the map attached to instrument recorded in Book 242 at Page11. 449. Agreement recorded August 11, 1971 in Book 256 at Page 907.12. Sewer easement and right-of-way as set forth in Deed of Easement recorded July 15, 1971 in13. Book 256 at Page 535 as Reception No. 146469 and in Deed recorded September 27, 1971 in Book 258 at Page 111 as Reception No. 147677. Agreement with the Board of County Commissioners recorded November 16, 1982 in Book 43514. at Page 734 as Reception No. 245578. City of Aspen Ordinance No. 26 (Series of 1987) recorded October 1, 1987 in Book 547 at Page15. 191 as Reception No. 293405. Rights of way and easements and other matters as shown on the Plat of Eastwood Subdivision16. recorded June 23, 1969 in Plat Book 4 at Page 4 as Reception No. 135881 and the Amended Plat recorded August 30, 1991 in Plat Book 27 at Page 37 as Reception No. 336038. Roadway Dedication (Eastwood Road), recorded August 30, 1991 in Book 655 at Pages 39017. through 416 as Reception Numbers 336012 through 336037. All matters shown on the Annexation Plat recorded July 22, 1987 in Book 19 at Page 97 as18. Reception No. 291233. Ordinance No. 28, Series of 1987 recorded July 22, 1987 in Book 541 at Page 979 as Reception19. No. 291234. Any rights, easements, interests or claims that may exist by reason of or reflected by the20. This page is only a part of a 2016 ALTA ® Commitment for Title Insurance issued by Stewart Title Guaranty Company. This Commitment is not valid without the Notice; the Commitment to Issue Policy; the Commitment Conditions; Schedule A; Schedule B, Part I-Requirements; and Schedule B, Part II-Exceptions. Copyright 2006-2016 American Land Title Association. All rights reserved. The use of this Form (or any derivative thereof) is restricted to ALTA licensees and ALTA members in good standing as of the date of use. All other uses are prohibited. Reprinted under license from the American Land Title Association. Commitment for Title Insurance (8-1-2016) Technical Correction 4-2-2018 Schedule B - Part II - continued Page 7 39 Commitment No: 7000657-C5 following facts shown on survey dated 03/08/2021 by True North Colorado, Project No. 2021-158: Boulder Wall, Steps and portion of asphalt driveway encroachment into Eastwood Dr. ROW Portions of Asphalt Driveway, Concrete Wall, Boulder Walls, Steps, 2-Story Stucco Home, Patio located in 5' Construction & Maintenance and Utility & Drainage Easement Portions of Boulder Walls, Steps, Asphalt Driveway, Concrete Wall located in 6' Utility & Drainage Easement Portions of Deck, Stucco Home, Steps, Patio built in setbacks This page is only a part of a 2016 ALTA ® Commitment for Title Insurance issued by Stewart Title Guaranty Company. This Commitment is not valid without the Notice; the Commitment to Issue Policy; the Commitment Conditions; Schedule A; Schedule B, Part I-Requirements; and Schedule B, Part II-Exceptions. Copyright 2006-2016 American Land Title Association. All rights reserved. The use of this Form (or any derivative thereof) is restricted to ALTA licensees and ALTA members in good standing as of the date of use. All other uses are prohibited. Reprinted under license from the American Land Title Association. Commitment for Title Insurance (8-1-2016) Technical Correction 4-2-2018 Schedule B - Part II - continued Page 8 40 Commitment No: 7000657-C5 DISCLOSURE STATEMENTS Note 1: Colorado Division of Insurance Regulations 3-5-1, Paragraph C of Article VII, requires that "Every Title entity shall be responsible for all matters which appear of record prior to the time of recording whenever the Title entity conducts the closing and is responsible for recording or filing of legal documents resulting from the transaction which was closed.” (Gap Protection) Note 2: Exception No. 4 of Schedule B, Section 2 of this Commitment may be deleted from the Owner's Policy to be issued hereunder upon compliance with the following conditions: The Land described in Schedule A of this commitment must be a single-family residence, which includes a1. condominium or townhouse unit. No labor or materials may have been furnished by mechanics or materialmen for purpose of construction on2. the Land described in Schedule A of this Commitment within the past 13 months. The Company must receive an appropriate affidavit indemnifying the Company against unfiled mechanic's3. and materialmen's liens. Any deviation from conditions A though C above is subject to such additional requirements or Information4. as the Company may deem necessary, or, at its option, the Company may refuse to delete the exception. Payment of the premium for said coverage.5. Note 3: The following disclosures are hereby made pursuant to §10-11-122, C.R.S.: The subject real property may be located in a special taxing district;(i) A certificate of taxes due listing each taxing jurisdiction shall be obtained from the County Treasurer or the(ii) County Treasurer's authorized agent; and Information regarding special districts and the boundaries of such districts may be obtained from the(iii) County Commissioners, the County Clerk and Recorder, or the County Assessor. Note 4: If the sales price of the subject property exceeds $100,000.00, the seller shall be required to comply with the disclosure or withholding provisions of C.R.S. §39-22-604.5 (Non-resident withholding). Note 5: Pursuant to C.R.S. §10-11-123 Notice is hereby given: (a)If there is recorded evidence that a mineral estate has been severed, leased or otherwise conveyed from the surface estate then there is a substantial likelihood that a third party holds some or all interest in oil, gas, other minerals, or geothermal energy in the property, and (b)That such mineral estate may include the right to enter and use the property without the surface owner's permission. Note 6: Effective September 1, 1997, C.R.S. §30-10-406 requires that all documents received for recording or filing in the clerk and recorder's office shall contain a top margin of at least one inch and a left, right and bottom margin of at least one-half inch the clerk and recorder may refuse to record or file any document that does not conform. Note 7: Our Privacy Policy: We will not reveal nonpublic personal customer information to any external non-affiliated organization unless we have been authorized by the customer, or are required by law. Note 8: Records: Regulation 3-5-1 Section 7 (N) provides that each title entity shall maintain adequate documentation and records sufficient to show compliance with this regulation and Title 10 of the Colorado Revised Statutes for a period of not less than seven (7) years, except as otherwise permitted by law. Note 9: Pursuant Regulation 3-5-1 Section 9 (F) notice is hereby given that “A title entity shall not earn interest on fiduciary funds unless disclosure is made to all necessary parties to a transaction that interest is or has been earned. Said disclosure must offer the opportunity to receive payment of any interest earned on such funds beyond any administrative fees as may be on file with the division. Said disclosure must be clear and conspicuous, and may be made at any time up to and including closing.” Be advised that the closing agent will or could charge an Administrative Fee for processing such an additional services request and any resulting payee will also be subjected to a W-9 or other required tax documentation for such Page 9 41 purpose(s). Be further advised that, for many transactions, the imposed Administrative Fee associated with such an additional service may exceed any such interest earned. Therefore, you may have the right to some of the interest earned over and above the Administrative Fee, if applicable (e.g., any money over any administrative fees involved in figuring the amounts earned). Note 10: Pursuant to Regulation 3-5-1 Section 9 (G) notice is hereby given that “Until a title entity receives written instructions pertaining to the holding of fiduciary funds, in a form agreeable to the title entity, it shall comply with the following: The title entity shall deposit funds into an escrow, trust, or other fiduciary account and hold them in a1. fiduciary capacity. The title entity shall use any funds designated as “earnest money” for the consummation of the transaction2. as evidenced by the contract to buy and sell real estate applicable to said transaction, except as otherwise provided in this section. If the transaction does not close, the title entity shall: Release the earnest money funds as directed by written instructions signed by both the buyer and seller;(a) or If acceptable written instructions are not received, uncontested funds shall be held by the title entity for(b) 180 days from the scheduled date of closing, after which the title entity shall return said funds to the payor. In the event of any controversy regarding the funds held by the title entity (notwithstanding any termination3. of the contract), the title entity shall not be required to take any action unless and until such controversy is resolved. At its option and discretion, the title entity may: Await any proceeding; or(a) Interplead all parties and deposit such funds into a court of competent jurisdiction, and recover court(b) costs and reasonable attorney and legal fees; or Deliver written notice to the buyer and seller that unless the title entity receives a copy of a summons(c) and complaint or claim (between buyer and seller), containing the case number of the lawsuit or lawsuits, within 120 days of the title entity's written notice delivered to the parties, title entity shall return the funds to the depositing party.” Note 11: Pursuant to Colorado Division of Insurance Regulation 8-1-3,Section 5, Paragraph C (11)(f), a closing protection letter is available to the consumer. Page 10 42 Commitment No: 7000657-C5 Page 11 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 Scale: AS NOTED ISSUE SCHEMATIC DESIGN PROPOSAL SET LAND USE SET191 EASTWOOD191 EASTWOOD ROADASPEN, CO 816111" ACTUAL IF THE ABOVE DIMENSION DOES NOT MEASURE ONE INCH (1") EXACTLY, THIS DRAWING WILL HAVE BEEN ENLARGED OR REDUCED, AFFECTING ALL LABELED SCALES. ALL DESIGNS, IDEAS ARRANGEMENTS AND PLANS INDICATED BY THESE DRAWINGS AND SPECIFICATIONS ARE THE PROPERTY AND COPYRIGHT OF KIM RAYMOND ARCHITECTS, INC. AND SHALL NEITHER BE USED ON ANY OTHER WORK NOR BE USED BY ANY OTHER PERSON FOR ANY USE WHATSOEVER WITHOUT WRITTEN PERMISSION. WRITTEN DIMENSIONS SHALL TAKE P R E C E D E N C E O V E R S C A L E D DIMENSIONS AND SHALL BE VERIFIED AT THE SITE . ANY DIMENSIONAL DISCREPANCY SHALL BE BROUGHT TO THE ATTENTION OF THE ARCHITECT PRIOR TO COMMENCEMENT OF WORK. A.1.01 11/16/21 EXISTING SITE PLAN DATE 7/15/21 www.kimraymondarchitects.com 970-925-22527/30/21 11/12/21 STAIRS 808 0 FLAT ROOFFLAT ROOFFLAT ROOFFLAT ROOF DECK BELOW PROPERTY LINE PROPERTY LINE SETBACK LINE SETBACK LINE SETBACK LINE PROPERTY L INEPROPERTY LINESCALE: 1/8" = 1'-0"1 EXISTING SITE PLAN N SCALE: 1/8" = 1'-0" 61 LOT 24 EA S T W O O D DRIV E LOT 12 XXXE BA S I S O F B E A R I N G S S 6 1 ° 1 3 ' 0 0 " E 2 1 0 . 2 5 'N41°56'30"E 59.82'N 5 6 ° 5 8 ' 0 0 " W 1 4 0 . 9 1 'S05°59'47"W 59.91'(P=S07°24'15"W 59.91')N76°55 ' 5 7 " W 14.52'(P=N7 6 ° 1 6 ' 0 0 " W ) L= 93.54 (P=94.77') R= 271.96' CB= N67°07'14"W (P=N66°57'00"W) CH= 93.07' (P=94.29') FOUND NO.5 REBAR FOUND NO.5 REBAR (BEARS S76°55'57"E 1.66') SET NO.5 REBAR & 1-1/4" ORANGE PLASTIC CAP LS 38215 SITE BENCHMARK SET NO.5 REBAR & 1-1/4" BLUE PLASTIC CAP LS 38215 (14' WITNESS CORNER) ELEVATION: 8058.70' FOUND NO.5 REBAR & 1-1/4" RED PLASTIC CAP (ILLEGIBLE) 14,858± SQ.FT. 0.341 AC. (AS-SURVEYED) 807 0 806 5 8 0 6 0 8055806080658 0 6 0 8 0 6 0 80708075 8 0 8 0 8 0 8 0 8 0 7 58063 LOT 13 LOT 11 LOT 23 LOT 22 LOT 25 80 5 5 191 EASTWOOD DRIVE, ASPEN 2-STORY STUCCO HOME 83. 2 '15.5'11. 4 ' 9.2' 18. 1 ' 30. 2 ' 14. 4 '15.0'16.0'4.8'4.5'15.9'FFE: 8 0 6 7 . 0 7 ' GRAVE L W A L K FFE: 8 0 7 6 . 3 8 ' FFE: 8 0 8 0 . 0 1 ' DE C KSTEPS SPA PATIOBO U L D E R WA L L ( T Y P ) CONCRETE W A L L RR- T I E W A L L BO U L D E R S WI R E F E N C E 10' SETBACK 5' SETBACK 5' SETBACK9.2'31.3'15.3'6' UTILITY & DRAINAGE EASEMENT BK4/PG4 (TYPICAL) (P A V E D R O A D W A Y 30 ' R I G H T O F W A Y ) EASPHALY DRIVEWAY 30' SETBACK6' UTILITY & DRAINAGE EASEMENT BK4/PG4 (TYPICAL) 5' CONSTRUCTION & MAINTENANCE OF UTILITY & DRAINAGE EASEMENT BK4/PG4 (TYPICAL) ELECTRICAL METERE SURVEYOR 'S CERTIFICATION SURVEY NOTES: 5.THIS IMPROVEMENT SURVEY PLAT DOES NOT CONSTITUTE A TITLE SEARCH BY TRUE NORTH COLORADO, LLC FOR ALL INFORMATION REGARDING EASEMENT, RIGHTS-OF-WAY AND/OR TITLE OF RECORD, TRUE NORTH COLORADO, LLC. RELIED UPON TITLE COMMITMENT NO. 7000657-C2 ISSUED BY TITLE COMPANY OF THE ROCKIES, EFFECTIVE DATE: MARCH 5, 2021. 6.ELEVATIONS SHOWN HEREON ARE BASED ON NORTH AMERICAN VERTICAL DATUM OF 1988 (NAVD 88) REFERENCED FROM NATIONAL GEODETIC SURVEY (NGS) BENCHMARK STATION Q-159 HAVING AN ELEVATION OF 7911.98. 7.CONTOUR INTERVAL EQUALS 1 FOOT. 8.2+ FEET OF SNOW AT DATE OF FIELD SURVEY, SOME IMPROVEMENTS MAY NOT HAVE BEEN VISIBLE. 9.THE HISTORIC TOPOGRAPHIC DATA SHOWN HEREON WAS PREPARED BY UTILIZING A 1958 TOPOGRAPHIC MAP OF THE CITY OF ASPEN PREPARED BY FALCON AIR MAPS AND SOME ASSUMPTIONS BASED ON THE UNDISTURBED EXISTING SLOPES AND GRADES OUTSIDE OF THE DEVELOPED AREAS OF THE PROPERTY AND IS THE BEST AVAILABLE EVIDENCE OF THE EXISTING GRADES PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION OF ANY IMPROVEMENTS. LOT 24 - EASTWOOD SUBDIVISION SECTION 18, TOWNSHIP 10 SOUTH, RANGE 84 WEST OF THE 6TH PM CITY OF ASPEN - COUNTY OF PITKIN - STATE OF COLORADO IMPROVEMENT & TOPOGRAPHIC SURVEY YEARS FROM THE DATE OF CERTIFICATION SHOWN HEREON. AFTER YOU FIRST DISCOVER SUCH DEFECT. IN NO EVENT MAY ANY ACTION ACTION BASED UPON ANY DEFECT IN THIS SURVEY WITHIN THREE YEARS BASED UPON ANY DEFECT IN THIS SURVEY BE COMMENCED MORE THAN TEN NOTICE: ACCORDING TO COLORADO LAW YOU MUST COMMENCE ANY LEGAL PROJECT NO: 2021-158 DATE: March 08, 2021 DRAWN LDV SURVEYED GBL SHEET 1 OF 1 TRUENORTH A LAND SURVEYING AND MAPPING COMPANY 15'7.5'30' SCALE: 1" = 15' N 0 PROPERTY ZONING SLOPES TRUE NORTH COLORADO LLC. A LAND SURVEYING AND MAPPING COMPANY P.O. BOX 614 - 386 MAIN STREET UNIT 3 NEW CASTLE, COLORADO 81647 (970) 984-0474 www.truenorthcolorado.com ELECTRICAL TRANSFORMER TELEPHONE PEDESTAL ELECTRIC PEDESTAL LEGEND MAILBOX P = PLATTED MEASUREMENT PROPERTY DESCRIPTION: 62 805080558060806580708075808080858090LOT 24EASTWOOD DRIVELOT 12XXXEBASIS OF BEARINGS S61°13'00"E 210.25'N41°56'30"E 59.82'N56°58'00"W 140.91'S05°59'47"W 59.91'(P=S07°24'15"W 59.91')N76°55'57"W14.52'(P=N76°16'00"W)L= 93.54 (P=94.77')R= 271.96'CB= N67°07'14"W(P=N66°57'00"W)CH= 93.07' (P=94.29')FOUND NO.5 REBARFOUND NO.5 REBAR(BEARS S76°55'57"E 1.66')SET NO.5 REBAR &1-1/4" ORANGE PLASTICCAP LS 38215SITE BENCHMARKSET NO.5 REBAR & 1-1/4" BLUEPLASTIC CAP LS 38215(14' WITNESS CORNER)ELEVATION: 8058.70'FOUND NO.5 REBAR &1-1/4" RED PLASTIC CAP(ILLEGIBLE)14,858± SQ.FT.0.341 AC.(AS-SURVEYED)LOT 13LOT 11LOT 23LOT 22LOT 25191 EASTWOOD DRIVE, ASPEN2-STORY STUCCO HOME83.2'15. 5 '11.4'9.2'18.1'30.2'14.4'15. 0 ' 16. 0 ' 4.8 ' 4.5 ' 15. 9 'FFE: 8067.07'GRAVEL WALKFFE: 8076.38'FFE: 8080.01'DECKSTEPSSPAPA T I O BOULDERWALL (TYP)CONCRETE WALLRR-TIE WALLBOULDERSWIRE FENCE10' SETBACK5' SETBACK5' SETBACK9.2 '31.3'15. 3 '6' UTILITY &DRAINAGE EASEMENTBK4/PG4(TYPICAL)(PAVED ROADWAY30' RIGHT OF WAY)EASPHALYDRIVEWAY30' SE T B A C K 6' UTILITY &DRAINAGE EASEMENTBK4/PG4(TYPICAL)5' CONSTRUCTION & MAINTENANCE OFUTILITY & DRAINAGE EASEMENT BK4/PG4(TYPICAL)HISTORIC CONTOURS(5' INTERVAL)(SEE NOTE #8)ELECTRICAL METERESURVEYOR'S CERTIFICATIONSURVEY NOTES:5.THIS IMPROVEMENT SURVEY PLAT DOES NOT CONSTITUTE A TITLE SEARCH BY TRUE NORTH COLORADO, LLC FORALL INFORMATION REGARDING EASEMENT, RIGHTS-OF-WAY AND/OR TITLE OF RECORD, TRUE NORTHCOLORADO, LLC. RELIED UPON TITLE COMMITMENT NO. 7000657-C2 ISSUED BY TITLE COMPANY OF THEROCKIES, EFFECTIVE DATE: MARCH 5, 2021.6.CONTOUR INTERVAL EQUALS 1 FOOT.7.2+ FEET OF SNOW AT DATE OF FIELD SURVEY, SOME IMPROVEMENTS MAY NOT HAVE BEEN VISIBLE.8.THE HISTORIC TOPOGRAPHIC DATA SHOWN HEREON WAS PREPARED BY UTILIZING A 1958 TOPOGRAPHIC MAPOF THE CITY OF ASPEN PREPARED BY FALCON AIR MAPS AND SOME ASSUMPTIONS BASED ON THEUNDISTURBED EXISTING SLOPES AND GRADES OUTSIDE OF THE DEVELOPED AREAS OF THE PROPERTY AND ISTHE BEST AVAILABLE EVIDENCE OF THE EXISTING GRADES PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION OF ANY IMPROVEMENTS.LOT 24 - EASTWOOD SUBDIVISION SECTION 18, TOWNSHIP 10 SOUTH, RANGE 84 WEST OF THE 6TH PMCITY OF ASPEN - COUNTY OF PITKIN - STATE OF COLORADOHISTORIC TOPOGRAPHIC SURVEYYEARS FROM THE DATE OF CERTIFICATION SHOWN HEREON.AFTER YOU FIRST DISCOVER SUCH DEFECT. IN NO EVENT MAY ANY ACTIONACTION BASED UPON ANY DEFECT IN THIS SURVEY WITHIN THREE YEARSBASED UPON ANY DEFECT IN THIS SURVEY BE COMMENCED MORE THAN TENNOTICE: ACCORDING TO COLORADO LAW YOU MUST COMMENCE ANY LEGALPROJECT NO: 2021-158DATE: March 08, 2021DRAWNLDVSURVEYEDGBLSHEET1 OF 1TRUENORTHA LAND SURVEYING AND MAPPING COMPANY15'7.5'30'SCALE: 1" = 15'N0PROPERTY ZONING TRUE NORTH COLORADO LLC.A LAND SURVEYING AND MAPPING COMPANYP.O. BOX 614 - 386 MAIN STREET UNIT 3NEW CASTLE, COLORADO 81647(970) 984-0474www.truenorthcolorado.comELECTRICAL TRANSFORMERTELEPHONE PEDESTALELECTRIC PEDESTALLEGENDMAILBOXP = PLATTED MEASUREMENTPROPERTY DESCRIPTION:63 CITY OF ASPEN COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT City of Aspen|130 S. Galena St.|(970) 920 5090 April 2020 COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT GENERAL LAND USE PACKET Attached is an Application for review of Development that requires Land Use Review pursuant to The City of Aspen Land Use Code: Included in this package are the following attachments: 1.Development Application Fee Policy, Fee Schedule and Agreement to Pay Application Fees Form 2.Land Use Application Form 3.Dimensional Requirements Form (if required) 4.HOA Compliance Form 5.Development Review Procedure All applications are reviewed based on the criteria established in Title 26 of the Aspen Municipal Code. Title 26 of the Aspen Municipal Code is available at the City Clerk’s Office on the second floor of City Hall and on the internet at https://library.municode.com/co/aspen/codes/municipal_code. We require all applicants to hold a Pre-Application Conference with a Planner in the Community Development Department so that the requirements for submitting a complete application can be fully described. This meeting can happen in person or by phone or email. Also, depending upon the complexity of the development proposed, submitting one copy of the development application to the Case Planner to determine accuracy, inefficiencies, or redundancies can reduce the overall cost of materials and staff time. Please recognize that review of these materials does not substitute for a complete review of the Aspen Land Use Regulations. While this application package attempts to summarize the key provisions of the Code as they apply to your type of development, it cannot possibly replicate the detail or the scope of the Code. If you have questions that are not answered by the materials in this package, we suggest that you contact the staff member assigned to your case, contact Planner of the Day (970-429-2764/planneroftheday@gmail.com), or consult the applicable sections of the Aspen Land Use Code. 64 CITY OF ASPEN COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT City of Aspen|130 S. Galena St.|(970) 920 5090 April 2020 Land Use Review Fee Policy The City of Aspen has established a review fee policy for the processing of land use applications. A flat fee or deposit is collected for land use applications based on the type of application submitted. A flat fee is collected by Community Development for applications that normally take a minimal and predictable amount of staff time to process. Review fees for other City Departments reviewing the application (referral departments) also will be collected when necessary. Flat fees are cumulative, i.e., an application with multiple flat fees must pay the sum of those flat fees. Flat fees are not refundable. A review fee deposit is collected by Community Development when more extensive staff time is required. Actual staff time spent will be charged against the deposit. Various City staff also may charge their time spent on the case in addition to the Case Planner. The deposit amount may be reduced if, in the opinion of the Community Development Department Director, the project is expected to take significantly less time to process than the deposit indicates. A determination on the deposit amount shall be made during the pre-application conference by the Case Planner. Hourly billing shall still apply. All applications must include an Agreement to Pay Application Fees. One payment including the deposit for Planning and referral agency fees must be submitted with each land use application, made payable to the City of Aspen. Applications will not be accepted for processing without the required fee(s). The Community Development Department shall keep an accurate record of the actual time required to process a land use application requiring a deposit. The City can provide a summary report of fees due at the applicant’s request. The applicant will be billed for the additional costs incurred by the City when the processing of an application by the Community Development Department takes more time or expense than is covered by the deposit. Any direct costs attributable to a project review shall be billed to the applicant with no additional administrative charge. In the event the processing of an application takes less time than provided for by the deposit, the Department shall refund the unused portion of the deposited fee to the applicant. Fees shall be due regardless of whether an applicant receives approval. Unless otherwise combined by the Director for simplicity of billing, all applications for conceptual, final, and recordation of approval documents shall be handled as individual cases for the purpose of billing. Upon conceptual approval, all billing shall be reconciled, and past due invoices shall be paid prior to the Director accepting an application for final review. Final review shall require a new deposit at the rate in effect at the time of final submission. Upon final approval, all billing shall again be reconciled prior to the Director accepting an application for review of technical documents for recordation. The Community Development Director may cease processing of a land use application for which an unpaid invoice is 30 or more days past due. Unpaid invoices of 90 days or more past due may be assessed a late fee of 1.75% per month. An unpaid invoice of 120 days or more may be subject to additional actions as may be assigned by the Municipal Court judge. All payment information is public domain. All invoices shall be paid prior to issuance of a Development Order or recordation of development agreements and plats. The City will not accept a building permit for a property until all invoices are paid in full. For permits already accepted, any unpaid invoice of 90 or more days may result in cessation of building permit processing or issuance of a stop work order until full payment is made. The property owner of record is the party responsible for payment of all costs associated with a land use application for the property. Any secondary agreement between a property owner and an applicant representing the owner (e.g. a contract purchaser) regarding payment of fees is solely between those private parties. 65 66 CITY OF ASPEN COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT City of Aspen|130 S. Galena St.|(970) 920 5090 April 2020 LAND USE APPLICATION APPLICANT: REPRESENTIVATIVE: Description: Existing and Proposed Conditions Review: Administrative or Board Review Required Land Use Review(s): Growth Management Quota System (GMQS) required fields: Net Leasable square footage Lodge Pillows Free Market dwelling units Affordable Housing dwelling units Essential Public Facility square footage Have you included the following? FEES DUE: $ Pre-Application Conference Summary Signed Fee Agreement HOA Compliance form All items listed in checklist on PreApplication Conference Summary Name: Address: Phone#:email: Address: Phone #: email: Name: Project Name and Address: Parcel ID # (REQUIRED) 191 Eastwood Drive, Aspen, CO 81611 273718120018 Kim Raymond Architecture + Interiors 501 East Hyman Avenue, Suite 205 (970) 925-2252 kim@krai.us or milo@krai.us Kim Raymond 273718120018 273718120018 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A 3,250 4 4 4 4 Existing non-conforming SFR to be remodeled and expanded requiring setback variance Board of Adjustments Board of Adjustments 67 CITY OF ASPEN COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT City of Aspen|130 S. Galena St.|(970) 920 5090 April 2020 DIMENSIONAL REQUIREMENTS FORM Complete only if required by the PreApplication checklist Project and Location Applicant: Zone District: Gross Lot Area: Net Lot Area: **Please refer to section 26.575.020 for information on how to calculate Net Lot Area Please fill out all relevant dimensions Single Family and Duplex Residential 1) Floor Area (square feet) 2) Maximum Height 3) Front Setback 4) Rear Setback 5) Side Setbacks 6) Combined Side Setbacks 7) % Site Coverage Existing Allowed Proposed Multi-family Residential 1)Number of Units 2)Parcel Density (see 26.710.090.C.10) 3)FAR (Floor Area Ratio) 4)Floor Area (square feet) Existing Allowed Proposed 8) Minimum distance between buildings Proposed % of demolition 5)Maximum Height 6)Front Setback 7) Rear Setback 8)Side Setbacks Proposed % of demolition Commercial Proposed Use(s) Existing Allowed Proposed 1) FAR (Floor Area Ratio) 2) Floor Area (square feet) 3) Maximum Height 4) Off-Street Parking Spaces 5) Second Tier (square feet) 6) Pedestrian Amenity (square feet) Proposed % of demolition Existing non-conformities or encroachments: Variations requested: Lodge Additional Use(s) 1)FAR (Floor Area Ratio) 2)Floor Area (square feet) 3)Maximum Height 4)Free Market Residential(square feet) 4)Front setback 5)Rear setback 6)Side setbacks 7)Off-Street Parking Spaces 8)Pedestrian Amenity (square feet) Proposed % of demolition Existing Allowed Proposed 68 69 CITY OF ASPEN COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT April 2020 City of Aspen|130 S. Galena St.|(970) 920 5090 DEVELOPMENT REVIEW PROCEDURE 1.Attend pre-application conference. During this one-on-one meeting, staff will determine the review process applies to your development proposal and will identify the materials necessary to review your application. 2.Submit Development Application. Based on your pre-application meeting, you should complete to the application package and submit the requested number of copies of the complete application and the appropriate processing fee to the Community Development Department. 3.Determination of Completeness. Within five (5) working days of the date of your submission, staff will review the application and notify you in writing whether the application is complete or if additional materials are required. Please be aware that the purpose of the completeness review is to determine whether or not the information you have submitted is adequate to review the request, and not whether the information is sufficient to obtain approval. 4.Staff Review of Development Application. Once your application is determined to be complete, it will be reviewed by the staff for compliance with the applicable standards of the Code. During the staff review stage, the application will be referred to other agencies for comments. The Planner assigned to your case or the agency may contact you if additional information is needed or if problems are identified. Staff will draft a memo for signature by the Community Development Director that explains whether your application complies with the Code, and will list any conditions that should apply if the application is to be approved. Final approval of any Development Application that amends a recorded document, such as a plat, agreement, or deed restriction, will require the applicant to prepare an amended version of that document for review and approval by staff. Staff will provide the applicant with the applicable contents for the revised plat. The City Attorney is normally in charge of the form for recorded agreements and deed restrictions. We suggest that you not go to the trouble or expense of preparing these documents until the staff has determined that your application is eligible for the requested amendment or exemption. 5. Board Review of Application. If a public hearing is required for the land use action that you are requesting, the Planning staff will schedule a hearing date for the application upon determination that the application is complete. The hearing(s) will be scheduled before the appropriate reviewing board(s). The applicant will be required to mail notice (one copy provided by the Community Development Department) to property owners within 30 feet of the subject property and post notice (sign available at the Community Development Department) of the public hearing on the site at least fifteen (15) days prior to the hearing date. (Please see Attachment 6 for instructions.) The Planning staff will publish notice of the hearing in the paper for land use requests that require publication. The Planning staff will then formulate a recommendation on the land use request and draft a memo to the reviewing board(s). Staff will supply the applicant with a copy of the Planning staff’s memo, approximately five (5) days prior to the hearing. The public hearing(s) will take place before the appropriate review boards. Public hearings include a presentation by the Planning staff, a presentation by the applicant (optional), consideration of public comment, and the reviewing board’s questions and decision. (Continued on next page) 70 CITY OF ASPEN COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT April 2020 City of Aspen|130 S. Galena St.|(970) 920 5090 6.Issuance of Development Order. If the land use review is approved, then the Planning staff will issue a Development Order, which allows the applicant to submit a building permit application. 7.Receipt of Building Permit. Once you have received a copy of the signed staff approval, you may apply for a building permit. During this time, your project will be examined for its compliance with the Uniform Building Code. It also will be checked for compliance with applicable provisions of the Land Use Regulations that were not reviewed in detail during the land use case review. (This might include a check of floor area ratios, setbacks, parking, open space and the like). Impact fees for water, sewer, parks, and employee housing will be collected as part of the permitting process. Any document required to be recorded, such as a plat, deed restriction, or agreement, will be reviewed and recorded before a building permit application is submitted. 71 Pitkin County Mailing List of 300 Feet Radius Pitkin County GIS presents the information and data on this web site as a service to the public. Every effort has been made to ensure that the information and data contained in this electronic system is accurate, but the accuracy may change. Mineral estate ownership is not included in this mailing list. Pitkin County does not maintain a database of mineral estate owners. Pitkin County GIS makes no warranty or guarantee concerning the completeness, accuracy, or reliability of the content at this site or at other sites to which we link. Assessing accuracy and reliability of information and data is the sole responsibility of the user. The user understands he or she is solely responsible and liable for use, modification, or distribution of any information or data obtained on this web site. This document contains a Mailing List formatted to be printed on Avery 5160 Labels. If printing, DO NOT "fit to page" or "shrink oversized pages." This will manipulate the margins such that they no longer line up on the labels sheet. Print actual size. From Parcel: 273718120018 on 11/16/2021 Instructions: Disclaimer: http://www.pitkinmapsandmore.com 72 ASPEN RIVERSIDE RETREAT LLC BOULDER, CO 80303 4800 BASELINE RD E104 PMB 232 TWINSTAR LLC EL PASO, TX 79901 303 N OREGON ST #1020 DEBRABANT KARINA NEW YORK, NY 10065 21 E 66TH ST, FLR 9 OLYMPIC BOWL LLC CHICAGO, IL 60606 191 N WACKER DR #1500 LINDENAU SCOTT A REV TRUST ASPEN, CO 81611 501 OBERMEYER PL #104 HJALMARSON ELIZABETH LIV TRUST ASPEN, CO 81611 1448 CRYSTAL LAKE RD MATTESON JOHN M BOSTON, MA 02210 49 MELCHER ST #501 MUSS LAUREN A LIV TRUST BOSTON, MA 02210 49 MELCHER ST #501 GERSON JAMES S PERSONAL TRUST OLATHE, KS 660511209 PO BOX 1209 JESA LLC MIAMI, FL 33180 19495 BISCAYNE BLVD, PH1 NEWMAN BROOKE ASPEN, CO 81611 0273 ROARING FORK DR BRUCATO JEFFREY ASPEN, CO 81612 PO BOX 1448 KROEGER HAROLD R & HEATHER R ASPEN, CO 81611 267 ROARING FORK DR REDSTONE SUSAN B ASPEN, CO 81612 PO BOX 159 BEAUSEANT TRUST SEDONA , AZ 86336 25 ANGLERS WAY KNOLLWOOD LOT 5 LLC HOUSTON, TX 77019 2001 KIRBY DR #603 TOKALA CHANDRASEKHAR & SUDHA KOLLI WICHITA, KS 67206 7910 E HARTMOOR ST GERSON PETER REV TRUST OLATHE, KS 66061 PO BOX 1209 GERSON JULIE QPRT OLATHE, KS 66051 PO BOX 1209 FISHER DONNA S ASPEN, CO 81611 257 EASTWOOD DR GODFREY BRUCE FAM TRST DENVER, CO 80209 1041 S HIGH ST FREEMAN FAMILY TRUST HOPEWELL, NJ 08525 3 TIMBERBROKE DR OKIE SUSAN MICHELLE REV TRUST ASPEN, CO 81611 501 OBERMEYER PL #104 BICKFORD SCOTT R NEW ORLEANS, LA 70130 338 LAFAYETTE ST HITCHNER KEN HONG KONG SAR CHINA, HOUSE 4, STRAWBERRY HILL, 36 PLANTATION RD KAUFMAN GIDEON ASPEN, CO 816127966 PO BOX 7966 MORRIS BENJAMIN & KRISTAL LVG TRUST AUSTIN, TX 78701 1108 LAVACA #110333 GERSON JULIE REV TRUST OLATHE, KS 660511209 PO BOX 1209 CANFIELD KENNETH STEVEN LIFE TRUST ASPEN, CO 81611 210 EASTWOOD DR 205 ROARING FORK LLC WEST LAKE HILLS, TX 78746 324 EANES SCHOOL RD 73 GERSON JOHN A PERSONAL TRUST OLATHE , KS 660511209 PO BOX 1209 PETERSON BROOKE A ASPEN, CO 81612 PO BOX 4068 BEHRHORST DAVID G ASPEN, CO 81611 257 EASTWOOD DR HODGES ANN V ASPEN, CO 81611 302 ROARING FORK DR GODFREY LESLI L FAM TRST DENVER, CO 80209 1041 S HIGH ST BEARFOOT REVOCABLE TRUST ASPEN, CO 81611 198 EASTWOOD DR 74 PRE-APPLICATION CONFERENCE SUMMARY DATE: October 25, 2021 PLANNER: Garrett Larimer, garrett.larimer@cityofaspen.com PROJECT ADDRESS: 191 Eastwood Dr. PARCEL ID# 2737-181-20-018 APPLICANT: Kim Raymond, kim@krai.us DESCRIPTION: The subject site is in the Moderate Density Residential (R-15b) zone district. The property is developed with a single-family residence that is non-conforming in regard to setbacks. A pre-app was requested and issued on April 12, 2021 for a remodel and addition to the structure. Since the pre-app was issued, identification of appropriate review processes for non-conforming structures has been clarified. The property currently encroaches into the setback but was built in conformance with dimensional requirements at the time it was originally built. The property lines were moved to accommodate a roadway dedication in the subdivision when the subdivision was annexed from the County to the City, so the location of the setbacks changed after the property was developed. Given the changes to the setback location, the property is considered legally established non-conforming. Section 26.312 outlines requirements and review processes for work involving non-conforming structures. Portions of the existing structure that fall within the setbacks that are proposed to be altered require a Replacement of Non-Conforming Structure review pursuant to Section 26.430, in order to alter, restore, and continue the setback non-conformity. In addition to the ability to continue a non-conformity review, the applicant is requesting setback variances to accommodate an addition. This request can be combined in a single review by the Planning and Zoning Commission. The applicant can request a setback variance request as part of the application, but pursuant to Section 26.430.040.B.3 will need to demonstrate that the variance is required to allow for reasonable use of the property. Parks and Engineering Department will be referrals on the application. RELEVANT ASPEN MUNICIPAL CODE SECTIONS: Section Number Section Title 26.304 Common Development Review Procedures 26.312 Non-Conformities 26.314.040 Variances 26.430.040.B Special Review 26.575.020.F Measuring Setbacks 26.710.070 Medium-Density Residential Zone District (R-15b) For your convenience – links to the Land Use Application and Land Use Code are below: Land Use Application Land Use Code Option 1 – Combined Review: REVIEW BY: Staff for determination of complete application and recommendation Planning and Zoning Commission for Decision REQUIRED LAND USE REVIEW(S): Special Review, Dimensional Variance 75 PUBLIC HEARING: Yes, at the Planning and Zoning Commission PLANNING FEES: $3,250 for 10 billable hours of staff time. (Additional/ lesser hours will be billed/ refunded at a rate of $325 per hour.) REFERRAL FEES: Engineering - $325 deposit for 1 hour of staff time. (Additional/ lesser hours will be billed/ refunded at a rate of $325 per hour.) Parks - $975 flat fee TOTAL DEPOSIT: $4,550 APPLICATION CHECKLIST – Please email the following application materials to garrett.larimer@cityofaspen.com as a single PDF:  Completed Land Use Application and signed fee Agreement.  Pre-application Conference Summary (this document).  Street address and legal description of the parcel on which development is proposed to occur, consisting of a current (no older than 6 months) certificate from a title insurance company, an ownership and encumbrance report, or attorney licensed to practice in the State of Colorado, listing the names of all owners of the property, and all mortgages, judgments, liens, easements, contracts and agreements affecting the parcel, and demonstrating the owner’s right to apply for the Development Application.  Applicant’s name, address and telephone number in a letter signed by the applicant that states the name, address and telephone number of the representative authorized to act on behalf of the applicant.  HOA Compliance form.  A vicinity map locating the parcel within the City of Aspen.  Site improvement survey (no older than a year from submittal) including topography and vegetation showing the current status, certified by a registered land surveyor, licensed in the state of Colorado. The survey should show setbacks and the Hallam Lake Bluff.  A written description of the proposal and an explanation in written, graphic, or model form of how the proposed development complies with the review standards relevant to the development application and relevant land use approval associated with the property.  Identification of review process requested.  Written responses to all review criteria in Sections 26.430.040.B and 26.314.040. Once the application is deemed complete by staff, the following will then need to be submitted:  Total deposit for review of the application. Disclaimer: The foregoing summary is advisory in nature only and is not binding on the City. The summary is based on current zoning, which is subject to change in the future, and upon factual representations that may or may not be accurate. The summary does not create a legal or vested right. 76 77 78 79 80 191 EASTWOOD DRIVE EASTWOOD D R I V E FRONT PROPE R T Y L I N E REAR PROPERTY LINE SIDE PROPERTY L INESIDE PROPERTY LINE18,661 sq ft SCALE: 1/8" = 1'-0"1 ORIGINAL PROPERTY LINE 81 191 EASTWOOD DRIVE 8,710 sq ft 30'-0"10'-0"5'-0" 5'-0" EASTWOOD D R I V E FRONT PROPE R T Y L I N E REAR PROPERTY LINE SIDE PROPERTY L INESIDE PROPERTY LINE18,661 sq ft SCALE: 1/8" = 1'-0"1 ORIGINAL PROPERTY W/ ORIGINAL SETBACK 82 191 EASTWOOD DRIVE 8,710 sq ft 30'-0"10'-0"5'-0" 5'-0" DASH INDICATES WALL BELOW AREA OF EXISTING NON-CONFORMITY AREA OF EXISTING NON-CONFORMITY AREA OF EXISTING STEEP GRADING, EXCEEDS 30" OF ALLOWABLE GRADING WITHIN SETBACK EASTWOOD D R I V E FRONT PROPE R T Y L I N E REAR PROPERTY LINE SIDE PROPERTY L INESIDE PROPERTY LINE18,661 sq ft CURRENT BUILDING FOOTPRINT SCALE: 1/8" = 1'-0"1 ORIGINAL PROPERTY W/ ORIGINAL SETBACK & CURRENT FOOTPRINT 83 191 EASTWOOD DRIVE 14,858 sq ft EASTWOOD D R I V E FRONT PROPE R T Y L I N E REAR PROPERTY LINE SIDE PROPERTY L INESIDE PROPERTY LINESCALE: 1/8" = 1'-0"1 CURRENT PROPERTY LINE 84 191 EASTWOOD DRIVE 14,858 sq ft 5,342 sq ft 10'-0"SETBACK5'-0" SETBACK 5'-0"SETBA C K 30'-0"SETBACK15'-0"CHANGE INPROPERTY LINE15'-0"CHANGE INSETBACK LINE59'-10 1/2"15'-2 1/8"59'-10 7/8 "15'-1 1/8 "19'-7 3/8"20'-3 3/4 " EASTWOOD D R I V E FRONT PROPE R T Y L I N E REAR PROPERTY LINE SIDE PROPERTY L INESIDE PROPERTY LINESCALE: 1/8" = 1'-0"1 CURRENT PROPERTY W/ CURRENT SETBACK 85 191 EASTWOOD DRIVE 14,858 sq ft 5,342 sq ft 10'-0"SETBACK5'-0" SETBACK 5'-0"SETBA C K 30'-0"SETBACK15'-0"CHANGE INPROPERTY LINE15'-0"CHANGE INSETBACK LINE59'-10 1/2"15'-2 1/8"59'-10 7/8 "15'-1 1/8 "19'-7 3/8"20'-3 3/4 " DASH INDICATES WALL BELOW AREA OF EXISTING NON-CONFORMITY AREA OF EXISTING NON-CONFORMITY AREA OF EXISTING STEEP GRADING, EXCEEDS 30" OF ALLOWABLE GRADING WITHIN SETBACK EASTWOOD D R I V E FRONT PROPE R T Y L I N E REAR PROPERTY LINE SIDE PROPERTY L INESIDE PROPERTY LINECURRENT BUILDING FOOTPRINT SCALE: 1/8" = 1'-0"1 CURRENT PROPERTY W/ CURRENT SETBACK & CURRENT FOOTPRINT 86 191 EASTWOOD DRIVE 14,858 sq ft 5,342 sq ft 41 sq ft10'-0"SETBACK5'-0" SETBACK 5'-0"SETBA C K 30'-0"SETBACK15'-0"CHANGE INPROPERTY LINE15'-0"CHANGE INSETBACK LINE59'-10 1/2"15'-2 1/8"59'-10 7/8 "15'-1 1/8 " 36'-11 5/8"19'-7 3/8"20'-3 3/4 " 1'-0 1/8"VARIANCE 9'-5" VARIANCE4'-11 1/2"VARIANCE34'-10 5/8" DASH INDICATES WALL BELOW AREA OF EXISTING NON-CONFORMITY DECK REDUCTION EASTWOOD D R I V E FRONT PROPE R T Y L I N E REAR PROPERTY LINE SIDE PROPERTY L INESIDE PROPERTY LINE2'-8 3/8"VARIANCE 10'-0"VARIANCE50 sq ft 243 sq ft 3 sq ft PROPOSED BUILDING FOOTPRINT SCALE: 1/8" = 1'-0"1 CURRENT PROPERTY W/ CURRENT/PROPOSED SETBACK & PROPOSED FOOTPRINT 87 Scale: AS NOTED ISSUE SCHEMATIC DESIGN PROPOSAL SET LAND USE SET 1" ACTUAL IF THE ABOVE DIMENSION DOES NOT MEASURE ONE INCH (1") EXACTLY, THIS DRAWING WILL HAVE BEEN ENLARGED OR REDUCED, AFFECTING ALL LABELED SCALES. ALL DESIGNS, IDEAS ARRANGEMENTS AND PLANS INDICATED BY THESE DRAWINGS AND SPECIFICATIONS ARE THE PROPERTY AND COPYRIGHT OF KIM RAYMOND ARCHITECTS, INC. AND SHALL NEITHER BE USED ON ANY OTHER WORK NOR BE USED BY ANY OTHER PERSON FOR ANY USE WHATSOEVER WITHOUT WRITTEN PERMISSION. WRITTEN DIMENSIONS SHALL TAKE P R E C E D E N C E O V E R S C A L E D DIMENSIONS AND SHALL BE VERIFIED AT THE SITE . ANY DIMENSIONAL DISCREPANCY SHALL BE BROUGHT TO THE ATTENTION OF THE ARCHITECT PRIOR TO COMMENCEMENT OF WORK. A 0.1 11/15/21 GENERAL INFORMATION DATE www.kimraymondarchitects.com 970-925-2252191 EASTWOOD191 EASTWOOD ROADASPEN, CO 816117/15/21 7/30/21 11/12/21 CONTRACTOR - - STRUCTURAL ENGINEER - - CIVIL ENGINEER - - MECHANICAL ENGINEER G.1.01 GENERAL INFORMATION SURVEY INTERPOLATED GRADE SURVEY A.1.01 EXISTING SITE PLAN A.1.02 PROPOSED SITE PLAN A.1.03 EXISTING FAR CALCULATIONS A.1.04 PROPOSED FAR CALCULATIONS A.2.01 EXISTING MAIN LEVEL PLAN A.2.02 EXISTING UPPER LEVEL PLAN A.2.03 EXISTING ROOF PLAN A.2.04 PROPOSED MAIN LEVEL PLAN A.2.05 PROPOSED UPPER LEVEL PLAN A.2.06 PROPOSED ROOF PLAN A.3.01 EXISTING ELEVATIONS: SOUTH & WEST A.3.02 EXISTING ELEVATIONS: NORTH & EAST A.3.03 PROPOSED ELEVATIONS: SOUTH & WEST A.3.04 PROPOSED ELEVATIONS: NORTH & EAST - - 13 4 2 1 A7.1 LOCATION KIM RAYMOND ARCHITECTS, INC. 802 EAST COOPER AVE #4 ASPEN, CO 81611 970-925-2252 ARCHITECT 191 EASTWOOD ABBREVIATIONS MATERIAL LEGEND VICINITY MAP PROJECT TEAMAPPLICABLE CODES PROJECT DATA SHEET INDEX (CONTINUED) SHEET INDEXSYMBOL LEGEND Subdivision: CITY AND TOWNSITE OF ASPEN Block: 120 Lot: F & G PARCEL ID NUMBER: ZONING: LOT SIZE: BLDG USE: OCC. GROUP: CONST. TYPE: CLIMATE ZONE: FIRE SPRINKLERS: LAND USE CATEGORY: TOWNSHIP: RANGE: SECTION: - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - PLT. S.T.D.SLOPE TO DRAIN A A.B. A.F.F. A.F.G. A/C ABC ABS ABV. ACB ACOU. ACT ADD. AG AHU AL. or ALUM. ALT. ANL ASPH. AVG AWG B.M. B.N. B.O. B.O.F. B.U. B/C BD. BLDG BLK. BLKG. BM. BR BRG. BRZ C.A.P. C.D. C.I.P. C.J. C.O. C.T. CAB CAM. CCTV CEM. CER CFM CH CKT. BKR. CL or C.L. CLG. CLKG. CLO. CLR. CMU CNTRD. COL. COMB. CONC. CONST. CONT. CONTR. CU d D.F. D.G. D.S. D/W DBL. DEMO DIA. or Ø DIAG. DIM. DL DN. DR E.A. E.F. E.J. E.N. E.W. EA. EL ELECT. ELEV. EMC EMT ENT EQ. EQUIP. EST. EVAP. EWC EXC EXH. EXIST. or E EXT. F.A. F.C. F.C.O. F.D. F.E. F.N. F.O. F.S. F/G FAB. FACP FDC FDN. FHC FIN. FL FLG. FLUOR. FP FTG. FURN. G.I. GA. GALV. GAR. GFCI GFI GL GLB GM GM GRC GYP. GYP. BD. H.B. H.C. H.M. H/C HDBD. HDW HGT. HOR. HTR HVAC HW HYD. I.C. I.D. I.F. ID IG IMC IMPG INCL. INSUL. INT. J-BOX JCT JT. K-D KD KO L.E.D. L.FT. LAM LAT. LAV LD. LIN. LINO. LT. LTG. LVL M.B. M.H. M.I. M.O. MAR. MAS. MAT'L MAX. MECH. MED. MFG. MFR. MIN. MISC. MOD MTL. MUL N.I.C. N.T.S. NCM NFC NLR. NO. NOM. O.C. O.D. O.H. O.I. O.R. OAI OH OPNG. OPPO. P.C. P.L. P.LAM. P.O.C. PERP. or PH or Ø PL. PLAS. PLUMB. PLYWD. PORC. PERF. PREFAB. PSF PSI PTN. PVC PWR. Q.T. QTY. R R.D.L. R.D.O. R.O. R.O.W. or R/W REF REF. REINF. REQ'D. RET. REV. RM RMV. S.C. S.D. S.O.V. S/L S/S SC SCHED. SECT. SES SH SHT'G. SIM. SPA. SPECS SPKR. SQ. FT. SQ. IN. STC STD. STL. SUSP. SW SYM SYS. T & G T.B. T.M.B. T.O. T.O.B. T.O.C. T.O.F. T.O.J. T.O.M. T.O.S. T.O.W. T.S. T.V. TEL. TH. THD. THK. THRU TLT. TRANS. TYP. UNF. UR V.B. V.I.F. VA VERT. WC WDW WCT WP WT. W/ W/O WD. W.I. YD. AMPERES ANCHOR BOLT ABOVE FINISHED FLOOR ABOVE FINISHED GRADE AIR CONDITIONING AGGREGATE BASE COURSE ACRYLONITRILE-BUTADIENE-STYRENE ABOVE ASBESTOS-CEMENT BOARD ACOUSTIC ACOUSTICAL CEILING TILE ADDITION or ADDENDUM ABOVE GRADE AIR HANDLER UNIT ALUMINUM ALTERNATE ANNEALED ASPHALT AVERAGE AMERICAN WIRE GAUGE ANGLE BENCH MARK BOUNDARY NAILING BOTTOM OF BOTTOM OF FOOTING BUILT UP BACK OF CURB BOARD BUILDING BLOCK BLOCKING BEAM BRASS BEARING BRONZE CONCRETE ASBESTOS PIPE CONSTRUCTION DOCUMENTS CAST IN PLACE CONTROL JOINT CLEAN OUT CERAMIC TILE CABINET CAMBER CLOSED CIRCUIT TELEVISION CEMENT CERAMIC CUBIC FEET PER MINUTE CHANNEL CIRCUIT BREAKER CENTERLINE CEILING CAULKING CLOSET CLEAR CONCRETE MASONRY UNIT CENTERED COLUMN COMBINATION CONCRETE CONSTRUCTION CONTINUOUS CONTRACTOR COPPER PENNY DRINKING FOUNTAIN DECOMPOSED GRANITE DOWN SPOUT DISHWASHER DOUBLE DEMOLITION DIAMETER DIAGONAL DIMENSION DEAD LOAD DOWN DOOR EXPANSION ANCHOR EXHAUST FAN EXPANSION JOINT END NAILING EACH WAY EACH ELEVATION "ELECTRIC, ELECTRICAL" ELEVATOR ELECTRICAL METALLIC CONDUIT ELECTRICAL METALLIC TUBING ELECTRICAL NON-METALLIC TUBING EQUAL EQUIPMENT ESTIMATE EVAPORATIVE COOLER ELECTRIC DRINKING COOLER EXCAVATE EXHAUST EXISTING EXTERIOR FIRE ALARM FAN COIL FLOOR CLEAN OUT FLOOR DRAIN FIRE EXTINGUISHER FIELD NAILING FACE OF FLOOR SINK FIBERGLASS FABRICATE FIRE ALARM CONTROL PANEL FIRE DEPARTMENT CONNECTION FOUNDATION FIRE HOSE CABINET FINISH FLOOR FLOORING FLUORESCENT FIRE PROOF FOOTING FURNISH GALVANIZED IRON GAUGE GALVANIZED GARAGE GROUND FAULT CIRCUIT INTERRUPTER GROUND FAULT INTERRUPTER GLASS GLUE LAMINATED BEAM GRADE MARK GATE VALVE GALVANIZED RIGID TUBING GYPSUM GYPSUM BOARD HOSE BIBB HOLLOW CORE HOLLOW METAL HANDICAPPED HARDBOARD HARDWARE HEIGHT HORIZONTAL HEATER HEATING, VENTILATING & AIR CONDITIONING HOT WATER HYDRAULIC INTERCOM OUTLET INSIDE DIAMETER INSIDE FACE IDENTIFICATION ISOLATED GROUND INTERMEDIATE METALLIC CONDUIT IMPREGNATED INCLUDE, INCLUSIVE INSULATION INTERIOR JUNCTION BOX JUNCTION JOINT KNOCK DOWN KILN DRIED KNOCK OUT LIGHT EMITTING DIODE LINEAR FEET LAMINATE LATERAL LAVATORY LEAD LINEAR LINOLEUM LIGHT LIGHTING LAMINATED VENEER LUMBER MACHINE BOLT MANHOLE MALLEABLE IRON MASONRY OPENING MARBLE MASONRY MATERIAL MAXIMUM MECHANICAL MEDIUM MANUFACTURING MANUFACTURER MINIMUM MISCELLANEOUS MODULAR METAL MULLION NOT IN CONTRACT NOT TO SCALE NON-CORROSIVE METAL NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION NAILER NUMBER NOMINAL ON CENTER OUTSIDE DIAMETER OVER HANG ORNAMENTAL IRON OUTSIDE RADIUS OUTSIDE AIR INTAKE OVER HEAD OPENING OPPOSITE PRECAST CONCRETE PROPERTY LINE PLASTIC LAMINATE POINT OF CONNECTION PERPENDICULAR PHASE PLASTER PLATE PLASTIC PLUMBING PLYWOOD PORCELAIN PERFORATED PREFABRICATED POUNDS PER SQUARE FOOT POUNDS PER SQUARE INCH PARTITION POLYVINYLCLORIDE POWER QUARRY TILE QUANTITY RADIUS ROOF DRAIN LEADER ROOF DRAIN OVERFLOW ROUGH OPENING RIGHT OF WAY REFRIGERATOR REFERENCE REINFORCED REQUIRED RETURN REVISION ROOM REMOVE SOLID CORE SMOKE DETECTOR SHUT OFF VALVE SKYLIGHT STAINLESS STEEL SELF CLOSING SCHEDULE SECTION SERVICE ENTRANCE SECTION SHEET SHEATHING SIMILAR SPACE SPECIFICATIONS SPEAKER SQUARE FEET SQUARE INCHES SOUND TRANSMISSION CLASS STANDARD STEEL SUSPENDED SWITCH SYMMETRICAL SYSTEM TONGUE AND GROOVE THROUGH BOLT TELEPHONE MOUNTING BOARD TOP OF TOP OF BEAM TOP OF CURB TOP OF FOOTING TOP OF JOIST TOP OF MASONRY TOP OF SLAB TOP OF WALL TUBE STEEL TELEVISION OUTLET TELEPHONE THRESHOLD THREADED THICK THROUGH TOILET TRANSFORMER TYPICAL UNFINISHED URINAL VAPOR BARRIER VERIFY IN FIELD VOLT AMPERE VERTICAL WATER CLOSET WINDOW WAINSCOT WEATHER PROOF WEIGHT WITH WITHOUT WOOD WROUGHT IRON YARD VCT VINYL COMPOSITION TILE JOISTJST. ALL CODES REFERENCED ARE TO BE USED AS AMENDED BY THE STATE OF COLORADO AND LOCAL JURISDICTION. NOTE: CODES BELOW ARE APPLICABLE ONLY IN AREAS. BECAUSE THE SCOPE OF WORK IS LESS THAN 40%, THE PROJECT IS NOT SUBJECT TO UPDATE TO CURRENT CODE -2015 INTERNATIONAL RESIDENTIAL CODE -2015 INTERNATION MECHANICAL CODE -2015 INTERNATIONAL PLUMBING CODE -2015 INTERNATIONAL FUEL & GAS CODE -2015 IECC (INTERNATIONAL ENERGY CONSERVATION CODE) - PITKIN COUNTY EFFICIENT BUILDING CODE -2014 NATIONAL ELECTRICAL CODE FINISH WOOD WOOD STUD BLOCKING STEEL STEEL STUD FRAMED WALL BATT INSULATION PLYWOOD CONCRETE STONE CMU SAND GRAVEL GWB COMPACTED SOIL SPRAY-FOAM INSULATION RIGID INSULATION GRID LINE BREAK LINE MATCH LINE REVISION A-701 ELEVATION MARKER SECTION MARKER DETAIL CUT DETAIL 1 A-501 ELEVATION D01 W01 ROOM NAME 101 INTERIOR ELEVATION MARKER ELEVATION NUMBER SHEET NUMBER SECTION NUMBER SHEET NUMBER DETAIL NUMBER SHEET NUMBER SHEET NUMBER ELEVATION NUMBER SPOT ELEVATION DOOR MARK WINDOW MARK ROOM NAME AND NUMBER 1 A-301 1 A-201 11 MAXIMUM FLOOR AREA: - - SQ FT ALLOWABLE DECK (15% OF MAX FLOOR AREA): - - SQ FT FRONT SETBACK: 25'-0" SIDE SETBACKS: 10'-0" REAR SETBACK: 10'-0" MAXIMUM HEIGHT (PRINCIPAL STRUCTURE) (FT.): 25'-0" 191 EASTWOOD ROAD ASPEN, CO 81611 88 LOT 24 EA S T W O O D DRIV E LOT 12 XXXE BA S I S O F B E A R I N G S S 6 1 ° 1 3 ' 0 0 " E 2 1 0 . 2 5 'N41°56'30"E 59.82'N 5 6 ° 5 8 ' 0 0 " W 1 4 0 . 9 1 'S05°59'47"W 59.91'(P=S07°24'15"W 59.91')N76°55 ' 5 7 " W 14.52'(P=N7 6 ° 1 6 ' 0 0 " W ) L= 93.54 (P=94.77') R= 271.96' CB= N67°07'14"W (P=N66°57'00"W) CH= 93.07' (P=94.29') FOUND NO.5 REBAR FOUND NO.5 REBAR (BEARS S76°55'57"E 1.66') SET NO.5 REBAR & 1-1/4" ORANGE PLASTIC CAP LS 38215 SITE BENCHMARK SET NO.5 REBAR & 1-1/4" BLUE PLASTIC CAP LS 38215 (14' WITNESS CORNER) ELEVATION: 8058.70' FOUND NO.5 REBAR & 1-1/4" RED PLASTIC CAP (ILLEGIBLE) 14,858± SQ.FT. 0.341 AC. (AS-SURVEYED) 807 0 806 5 8 0 6 0 8055806080658 0 6 0 8 0 6 0 80708075 8 0 8 0 8 0 8 0 8 0 7 58063 LOT 13 LOT 11 LOT 23 LOT 22 LOT 25 80 5 5 191 EASTWOOD DRIVE, ASPEN 2-STORY STUCCO HOME 83. 2 '15.5'11. 4 ' 9.2' 18. 1 ' 30. 2 ' 14. 4 '15.0'16.0'4.8'4.5'15.9'FFE: 8 0 6 7 . 0 7 ' GRAVE L W A L K FFE: 8 0 7 6 . 3 8 ' FFE: 8 0 8 0 . 0 1 ' DE C KSTEPS SPA PATIOBO U L D E R WA L L ( T Y P ) CONCRETE W A L L RR- T I E W A L L BO U L D E R S WI R E F E N C E 10' SETBACK 5' SETBACK 5' SETBACK9.2'31.3'15.3'6' UTILITY & DRAINAGE EASEMENT BK4/PG4 (TYPICAL) (P A V E D R O A D W A Y 30 ' R I G H T O F W A Y ) EASPHALY DRIVEWAY 30' SETBACK6' UTILITY & DRAINAGE EASEMENT BK4/PG4 (TYPICAL) 5' CONSTRUCTION & MAINTENANCE OF UTILITY & DRAINAGE EASEMENT BK4/PG4 (TYPICAL) ELECTRICAL METERE SURVEYOR 'S CERTIFICATION SURVEY NOTES: 5.THIS IMPROVEMENT SURVEY PLAT DOES NOT CONSTITUTE A TITLE SEARCH BY TRUE NORTH COLORADO, LLC FOR ALL INFORMATION REGARDING EASEMENT, RIGHTS-OF-WAY AND/OR TITLE OF RECORD, TRUE NORTH COLORADO, LLC. RELIED UPON TITLE COMMITMENT NO. 7000657-C2 ISSUED BY TITLE COMPANY OF THE ROCKIES, EFFECTIVE DATE: MARCH 5, 2021. 6.ELEVATIONS SHOWN HEREON ARE BASED ON NORTH AMERICAN VERTICAL DATUM OF 1988 (NAVD 88) REFERENCED FROM NATIONAL GEODETIC SURVEY (NGS) BENCHMARK STATION Q-159 HAVING AN ELEVATION OF 7911.98. 7.CONTOUR INTERVAL EQUALS 1 FOOT. 8.2+ FEET OF SNOW AT DATE OF FIELD SURVEY, SOME IMPROVEMENTS MAY NOT HAVE BEEN VISIBLE. 9.THE HISTORIC TOPOGRAPHIC DATA SHOWN HEREON WAS PREPARED BY UTILIZING A 1958 TOPOGRAPHIC MAP OF THE CITY OF ASPEN PREPARED BY FALCON AIR MAPS AND SOME ASSUMPTIONS BASED ON THE UNDISTURBED EXISTING SLOPES AND GRADES OUTSIDE OF THE DEVELOPED AREAS OF THE PROPERTY AND IS THE BEST AVAILABLE EVIDENCE OF THE EXISTING GRADES PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION OF ANY IMPROVEMENTS. LOT 24 - EASTWOOD SUBDIVISION SECTION 18, TOWNSHIP 10 SOUTH, RANGE 84 WEST OF THE 6TH PM CITY OF ASPEN - COUNTY OF PITKIN - STATE OF COLORADO IMPROVEMENT & TOPOGRAPHIC SURVEY YEARS FROM THE DATE OF CERTIFICATION SHOWN HEREON. AFTER YOU FIRST DISCOVER SUCH DEFECT. IN NO EVENT MAY ANY ACTION ACTION BASED UPON ANY DEFECT IN THIS SURVEY WITHIN THREE YEARS BASED UPON ANY DEFECT IN THIS SURVEY BE COMMENCED MORE THAN TEN NOTICE: ACCORDING TO COLORADO LAW YOU MUST COMMENCE ANY LEGAL PROJECT NO: 2021-158 DATE: March 08, 2021 DRAWN LDV SURVEYED GBL SHEET 1 OF 1 TRUENORTH A LAND SURVEYING AND MAPPING COMPANY 15'7.5'30' SCALE: 1" = 15' N 0 PROPERTY ZONING SLOPES TRUE NORTH COLORADO LLC. A LAND SURVEYING AND MAPPING COMPANY P.O. BOX 614 - 386 MAIN STREET UNIT 3 NEW CASTLE, COLORADO 81647 (970) 984-0474 www.truenorthcolorado.com ELECTRICAL TRANSFORMER TELEPHONE PEDESTAL ELECTRIC PEDESTAL LEGEND MAILBOX P = PLATTED MEASUREMENT PROPERTY DESCRIPTION: 89 8 0 5 0 8 0 5 5 8 0 6 0 8 0 6 5 8 0 7 0 8 0 7 5 8 0 8 0 8 0 8 5 8 0 9 0 LOT 24 EA S T W O O D DRIV E LOT 12 XXXE BA S I S O F B E A R I N G S S 6 1 ° 1 3 ' 0 0 " E 2 1 0 . 2 5 'N41°56'30"E 59.82'N5 6 ° 5 8 ' 0 0 " W 1 4 0 . 9 1 'S05°59'47"W 59.91'(P=S07°24'15"W 59.91')N76°5 5 ' 5 7 " W 14.52'(P=N7 6 ° 1 6 ' 0 0 " W ) L= 93.54 (P=94.77') R= 271.96' CB= N67°07'14"W (P=N66°57'00"W) CH= 93.07' (P=94.29') FOUND NO.5 REBAR FOUND NO.5 REBAR (BEARS S76°55'57"E 1.66') SET NO.5 REBAR & 1-1/4" ORANGE PLASTIC CAP LS 38215 SITE BENCHMARK SET NO.5 REBAR & 1-1/4" BLUE PLASTIC CAP LS 38215 (14' WITNESS CORNER) ELEVATION: 8058.70' FOUND NO.5 REBAR & 1-1/4" RED PLASTIC CAP (ILLEGIBLE) 14,858± SQ.FT. 0.341 AC. (AS-SURVEYED) LOT 13 LOT 11 LOT 23 LOT 22 LOT 25 191 EASTWOOD DRIVE, ASPEN 2-STORY STUCCO HOME 83. 2 '15.5'11. 4 ' 9.2' 18. 1 ' 30. 2 ' 14. 4 '15.0'16.0'4.8'4.5'15.9'FFE: 8 0 6 7 . 0 7 ' GRAVE L W A L K FFE: 8 0 7 6 . 3 8 ' FFE: 8 0 8 0 . 0 1 ' DE C KSTEPS SPA PATIOBO U L D E R WA L L ( T Y P ) CONCRETE W A L L RR- T I E W A L L BO U L D E R S WI R E F E N C E 10' SETBACK 5' SETBACK 5' SETBACK9.2'31.3'15.3'6' UTILITY & DRAINAGE EASEMENT BK4/PG4 (TYPICAL) (P A V E D R O A D W A Y 30 ' R I G H T O F W A Y ) EASPHALY DRIVEWAY 30' SETBACK6' UTILITY & DRAINAGE EASEMENT BK4/PG4 (TYPICAL) 5' CONSTRUCTION & MAINTENANCE OF UTILITY & DRAINAGE EASEMENT BK4/PG4 (TYPICAL) HISTORIC CONTOURS (5' INTERVAL) (SEE NOTE #8) ELECTRICAL METERE SURVEYOR'S CERTIFICATION SURVEY NOTES: 5.THIS IMPROVEMENT SURVEY PLAT DOES NOT CONSTITUTE A TITLE SEARCH BY TRUE NORTH COLORADO, LLC FOR ALL INFORMATION REGARDING EASEMENT, RIGHTS-OF-WAY AND/OR TITLE OF RECORD, TRUE NORTH COLORADO, LLC. RELIED UPON TITLE COMMITMENT NO. 7000657-C2 ISSUED BY TITLE COMPANY OF THE ROCKIES, EFFECTIVE DATE: MARCH 5, 2021. 6.CONTOUR INTERVAL EQUALS 1 FOOT. 7.2+ FEET OF SNOW AT DATE OF FIELD SURVEY, SOME IMPROVEMENTS MAY NOT HAVE BEEN VISIBLE. 8.THE HISTORIC TOPOGRAPHIC DATA SHOWN HEREON WAS PREPARED BY UTILIZING A 1958 TOPOGRAPHIC MAP OF THE CITY OF ASPEN PREPARED BY FALCON AIR MAPS AND SOME ASSUMPTIONS BASED ON THE UNDISTURBED EXISTING SLOPES AND GRADES OUTSIDE OF THE DEVELOPED AREAS OF THE PROPERTY AND IS THE BEST AVAILABLE EVIDENCE OF THE EXISTING GRADES PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION OF ANY IMPROVEMENTS. LOT 24 - EASTWOOD SUBDIVISION SECTION 18, TOWNSHIP 10 SOUTH, RANGE 84 WEST OF THE 6TH PM CITY OF ASPEN - COUNTY OF PITKIN - STATE OF COLORADO HISTORIC TOPOGRAPHIC SURVEY YEARS FROM THE DATE OF CERTIFICATION SHOWN HEREON. AFTER YOU FIRST DISCOVER SUCH DEFECT. IN NO EVENT MAY ANY ACTION ACTION BASED UPON ANY DEFECT IN THIS SURVEY WITHIN THREE YEARS BASED UPON ANY DEFECT IN THIS SURVEY BE COMMENCED MORE THAN TEN NOTICE: ACCORDING TO COLORADO LAW YOU MUST COMMENCE ANY LEGAL PROJECT NO: 2021-158 DATE: March 08, 2021 DRAWN LDV SURVEYED GBL SHEET 1 OF 1 TRUENORTH A LAND SURVEYING AND MAPPING COMPANY 15'7.5'30' SCALE: 1" = 15' N 0 PROPERTY ZONING TRUE NORTH COLORADO LLC. A LAND SURVEYING AND MAPPING COMPANY P.O. BOX 614 - 386 MAIN STREET UNIT 3 NEW CASTLE, COLORADO 81647 (970) 984-0474 www.truenorthcolorado.com ELECTRICAL TRANSFORMER TELEPHONE PEDESTAL ELECTRIC PEDESTAL LEGEND MAILBOX P = PLATTED MEASUREMENT PROPERTY DESCRIPTION: 90 Scale: AS NOTED ISSUE SCHEMATIC DESIGN PROPOSAL SET LAND USE SET191 EASTWOOD191 EASTWOOD ROADASPEN, CO 816111" ACTUAL IF THE ABOVE DIMENSION DOES NOT MEASURE ONE INCH (1") EXACTLY, THIS DRAWING WILL HAVE BEEN ENLARGED OR REDUCED, AFFECTING ALL LABELED SCALES. ALL DESIGNS, IDEAS ARRANGEMENTS AND PLANS INDICATED BY THESE DRAWINGS AND SPECIFICATIONS ARE THE PROPERTY AND COPYRIGHT OF KIM RAYMOND ARCHITECTS, INC. AND SHALL NEITHER BE USED ON ANY OTHER WORK NOR BE USED BY ANY OTHER PERSON FOR ANY USE WHATSOEVER WITHOUT WRITTEN PERMISSION. WRITTEN DIMENSIONS SHALL TAKE P R E C E D E N C E O V E R S C A L E D DIMENSIONS AND SHALL BE VERIFIED AT THE SITE . ANY DIMENSIONAL DISCREPANCY SHALL BE BROUGHT TO THE ATTENTION OF THE ARCHITECT PRIOR TO COMMENCEMENT OF WORK. A.1.01 11/15/21 EXISTING SITE PLAN DATE 7/15/21 www.kimraymondarchitects.com 970-925-22527/30/21 11/12/21 STAIRS 808 0 FLAT ROOFFLAT ROOFFLAT ROOFFLAT ROOF DECK BELOW PROPERTY LINE PROPERTY LINE SETBACK LINE SETBACK LINE SETBACK LINE PROPERTY L INEPROPERTY LINESCALE: 1/8" = 1'-0"1 EXISTING SITE PLAN N SCALE: 1/8" = 1'-0" 91 Scale: AS NOTED ISSUE SCHEMATIC DESIGN PROPOSAL SET LAND USE SET191 EASTWOOD191 EASTWOOD ROADASPEN, CO 816111" ACTUAL IF THE ABOVE DIMENSION DOES NOT MEASURE ONE INCH (1") EXACTLY, THIS DRAWING WILL HAVE BEEN ENLARGED OR REDUCED, AFFECTING ALL LABELED SCALES. ALL DESIGNS, IDEAS ARRANGEMENTS AND PLANS INDICATED BY THESE DRAWINGS AND SPECIFICATIONS ARE THE PROPERTY AND COPYRIGHT OF KIM RAYMOND ARCHITECTS, INC. AND SHALL NEITHER BE USED ON ANY OTHER WORK NOR BE USED BY ANY OTHER PERSON FOR ANY USE WHATSOEVER WITHOUT WRITTEN PERMISSION. WRITTEN DIMENSIONS SHALL TAKE P R E C E D E N C E O V E R S C A L E D DIMENSIONS AND SHALL BE VERIFIED AT THE SITE . ANY DIMENSIONAL DISCREPANCY SHALL BE BROUGHT TO THE ATTENTION OF THE ARCHITECT PRIOR TO COMMENCEMENT OF WORK. A.1.02 11/15/21 PROPOSED SITE PLAN DATE 7/15/21 www.kimraymondarchitects.com 970-925-22527/30/21 11/12/21 FLAT ROOFFLAT ROOFFLAT ROOF DECK BELOW SLOPED ROOF PROPERTY LINE PROPERTY LINE SETBACK LINE SETBACK LINE SETBACK LINE PROPERTY L INEPROPERTY LINEPROPOSED SET B A C K L I N E PROPOSED SETBACK LINE SCALE: 1/8" = 1'-0"1 PROPOSED SITE PLAN N SCALE: 1/8" = 1'-0" 92 Scale: AS NOTED ISSUE SCHEMATIC DESIGN PROPOSAL SET LAND USE SET 1" ACTUAL IF THE ABOVE DIMENSION DOES NOT MEASURE ONE INCH (1") EXACTLY, THIS DRAWING WILL HAVE BEEN ENLARGED OR REDUCED, AFFECTING ALL LABELED SCALES. ALL DESIGNS, IDEAS ARRANGEMENTS AND PLANS INDICATED BY THESE DRAWINGS AND SPECIFICATIONS ARE THE PROPERTY AND COPYRIGHT OF KIM RAYMOND ARCHITECTS, INC. AND SHALL NEITHER BE USED ON ANY OTHER WORK NOR BE USED BY ANY OTHER PERSON FOR ANY USE WHATSOEVER WITHOUT WRITTEN PERMISSION. WRITTEN DIMENSIONS SHALL TAKE P R E C E D E N C E O V E R S C A L E D DIMENSIONS AND SHALL BE VERIFIED AT THE SITE . ANY DIMENSIONAL DISCREPANCY SHALL BE BROUGHT TO THE ATTENTION OF THE ARCHITECT PRIOR TO COMMENCEMENT OF WORK. A.1.03 11/15/21 EXISTING FAR CALCULATIONS DATE www.kimraymondarchitects.com 970-925-2252191 EASTWOOD191 EASTWOOD ROADASPEN, CO 816117/15/21 7/30/21 11/12/21 EXISTING FLOOR AREA CALCULATIONS CITY OF ASPEN ZONING SUBMISSION SUBGRADE LEVEL WALL LABEL TOTAL WALL AREA (SQ. FT.) EXPOSED WALL AREA (SQ. FT.) 1 337 84 2 236 69 3 305 289 4 160 160 5 121 121 6 118 118 OVERALL TOTAL WALL AREA (SQ. FT.)1277 EXPOSED WALL AREA (SQ. FT.)841 % OF EXPOSED WALL (EXPOSED/TOTAL)65.86% SUBGRADE GROSS FLOOR AREA (SQ. FT.)605 SUBGRADE COUNTABLE FLOOR AREA (SQ. FT.)398.44 LOWER LEVEL FLOOR AREA (SQ. FT.) 0 MAIN LEVEL FLOOR AREA (SQ. FT.)399 UPPER LEVEL FLOOR AREA (SQ. FT.)1673 GARAGE FLOOR AREA 0 DECK FLOOR AREA (15% OF 3172 = 475) 604 SQ. FT. 129 EXEMPT TOTAL EXISTING FLOOR AREA (SQ. FT.)2201 (3172 ALLOWED) TOTAL EXISTING FLOOR AREA CALCULATIONS EXISTING SUBGRADE LEVEL EXPOSED WALL CALCULATIONS 305 sq ft 84 sq ft 236 sq ft 289 sq ft 160 sq ft 121 sq ft 118 sq ft 337 sq ft 1 2 3 4 5 6 69 sq ft1,105 sq ft GROSS 22 sq ftD01 D01D07 D07 D07D07237 sq ft (-500 EXEMPT) 0 sq ft 65.86 EXPOSED WALL 1,105 GROSS SQ FT - 500 GARAGE =605 SQ FT * .6586 = 399 SQ FT 133 sq ft W50D02W50 W50 W50 W50 W50 W50W50W50W50 W50 W50W50W50W50W50W50 D07 D07D07 D07D02 D07W50D02D02D02D02D07 1,673 sq ft 449 sq ft SCALE: 3/16" = 1'-0"2 FAR ELEVATIONS SCALE: 3/16" = 1'-0"1 EXISTING MAIN LEVEL FAR SCALE: 3/16" = 1'-0"3 EXISTING UPPER LEVEL FAR 93 Scale: AS NOTED ISSUE SCHEMATIC DESIGN PROPOSAL SET LAND USE SET 1" ACTUAL IF THE ABOVE DIMENSION DOES NOT MEASURE ONE INCH (1") EXACTLY, THIS DRAWING WILL HAVE BEEN ENLARGED OR REDUCED, AFFECTING ALL LABELED SCALES. ALL DESIGNS, IDEAS ARRANGEMENTS AND PLANS INDICATED BY THESE DRAWINGS AND SPECIFICATIONS ARE THE PROPERTY AND COPYRIGHT OF KIM RAYMOND ARCHITECTS, INC. AND SHALL NEITHER BE USED ON ANY OTHER WORK NOR BE USED BY ANY OTHER PERSON FOR ANY USE WHATSOEVER WITHOUT WRITTEN PERMISSION. WRITTEN DIMENSIONS SHALL TAKE P R E C E D E N C E O V E R S C A L E D DIMENSIONS AND SHALL BE VERIFIED AT THE SITE . ANY DIMENSIONAL DISCREPANCY SHALL BE BROUGHT TO THE ATTENTION OF THE ARCHITECT PRIOR TO COMMENCEMENT OF WORK. A.1.04 11/15/21 PROPOSED FAR CALCULATIONS DATE www.kimraymondarchitects.com 970-925-2252191 EASTWOOD191 EASTWOOD ROADASPEN, CO 816117/15/21 7/30/21 11/12/21D01GD1D01GD1 D39 D39 D01 D01 1,753 sq ft GROSS 649 sq ft (500 sq ft EXEMPT) (149 sq ft) 225 sq ft > 5'-6" (EXEMPT) UP UP 57.23 EXPOSED WALL 1,753 GROSS SQ FT - 500 GARAGE =1,253 SQ FT * .5817 = 729 SQ FT D39W34 W34 W34 W34 W34 W34W34W34 W34W34 W34 W34W34 D39W34W34W34W34W34W34W34W34 D392,294 sq ft 411 sq ft62 sq ftDN UP 285 sq ft 85 sq ft 268 sq ft 272 sq ft 28 sq ft 16 sq ft 338 sq ft 116 sq ft 22 sq ft 336 sq ft143 sq ft 432 sq ft 283 sq ft 142 sq ft 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 SCALE: 3/16" = 1'-0"1 PROPOSED MAIN LEVEL FAR SCALE: 3/16" = 1'-0"3 PROPOSED UPPER LEVEL FAR SCALE: 3/16" = 1'-0"2 FAR ELEVATIONS 94 Scale: AS NOTED ISSUE SCHEMATIC DESIGN PROPOSAL SET LAND USE SET191 EASTWOOD191 EASTWOOD ROADASPEN, CO 816111" ACTUAL IF THE ABOVE DIMENSION DOES NOT MEASURE ONE INCH (1") EXACTLY, THIS DRAWING WILL HAVE BEEN ENLARGED OR REDUCED, AFFECTING ALL LABELED SCALES. ALL DESIGNS, IDEAS ARRANGEMENTS AND PLANS INDICATED BY THESE DRAWINGS AND SPECIFICATIONS ARE THE PROPERTY AND COPYRIGHT OF KIM RAYMOND ARCHITECTS, INC. AND SHALL NEITHER BE USED ON ANY OTHER WORK NOR BE USED BY ANY OTHER PERSON FOR ANY USE WHATSOEVER WITHOUT WRITTEN PERMISSION. WRITTEN DIMENSIONS SHALL TAKE P R E C E D E N C E O V E R S C A L E D DIMENSIONS AND SHALL BE VERIFIED AT THE SITE . ANY DIMENSIONAL DISCREPANCY SHALL BE BROUGHT TO THE ATTENTION OF THE ARCHITECT PRIOR TO COMMENCEMENT OF WORK. A.2.01 11/15/21 EXISTING MAIN LEVEL PLAN DATE 7/15/21 www.kimraymondarchitects.com 970-925-22527/30/21 11/12/21D01D01D07 D07 D07D07C C A A 1 1 5 5 4 4 3 3 E E 2 2 B37'-4 1/4"10'-2 1/4"4'-8"14'-10 1/2"7'-7 1/2"82'-5 5/8" 14'-6 3/8"29'-6 3/4"20'-6 1/2"17'-10" 82'-5 5/8" 14'-6 3/8"29'-6 3/4"20'-6 1/2"17'-10"37'-4 1/4"14'-10 1/4"14'-10 1/2"7'-7 1/2"1 A.3.012A.3.011 A.3.02 2A.3.01GARAGE BEDROOM 2 BEDROOM 1 BATH 1 LAUNDRY ENTRY STAIRWELL BATH 2 D D PROPERTY LINE SETBACK LINE SETBACK LINE SETBACK LINE N SCALE: 1/4" = 1'-0" 95 Scale: AS NOTED ISSUE SCHEMATIC DESIGN PROPOSAL SET LAND USE SET191 EASTWOOD191 EASTWOOD ROADASPEN, CO 816111" ACTUAL IF THE ABOVE DIMENSION DOES NOT MEASURE ONE INCH (1") EXACTLY, THIS DRAWING WILL HAVE BEEN ENLARGED OR REDUCED, AFFECTING ALL LABELED SCALES. ALL DESIGNS, IDEAS ARRANGEMENTS AND PLANS INDICATED BY THESE DRAWINGS AND SPECIFICATIONS ARE THE PROPERTY AND COPYRIGHT OF KIM RAYMOND ARCHITECTS, INC. AND SHALL NEITHER BE USED ON ANY OTHER WORK NOR BE USED BY ANY OTHER PERSON FOR ANY USE WHATSOEVER WITHOUT WRITTEN PERMISSION. WRITTEN DIMENSIONS SHALL TAKE P R E C E D E N C E O V E R S C A L E D DIMENSIONS AND SHALL BE VERIFIED AT THE SITE . ANY DIMENSIONAL DISCREPANCY SHALL BE BROUGHT TO THE ATTENTION OF THE ARCHITECT PRIOR TO COMMENCEMENT OF WORK. A.2.02 11/15/21 EXISTING UPPER LEVEL PLAN DATE 7/15/21 www.kimraymondarchitects.com 970-925-22527/30/21 11/12/21DWTRASHW50D02W50W50W50W50W50 W50W50W50W50 W50 W50W50W50W50W50W50 D07 D07D07 D07D02 D07W50D02D02D02D02D07 C C A A 1 1 5 5 4 4 3 3 E E 2 2 B 1 A.3.012A.3.011 A.3.02 2A.3.0182'-5 1/2" 14'-6 1/2"29'-6 3/4"20'-6 1/2"17'-10"37'-4 1/4"10'-2 1/4"4'-8"14'-10 1/2"7'-7 1/2"82'-5 1/2" 14'-6 1/2"29'-6 3/4"20'-6 1/2"17'-10"37'-4 1/4"10'-2 1/4"4'-8"14'-10 1/2"7'-7 1/2"MASTER BEDROOM MASTER CLOSET MASTER CLOSET MASTER BATH BATH 3 CLOSETPANTRY KITCHEN FAMILY ROOM LIVING ROOM DECK D D PROPERTY LINE PROPERTY LIN E SETBACK LINE SETBACK LINE SETBACK LINE N SCALE: 1/4" = 1'-0" 96 Scale: AS NOTED ISSUE SCHEMATIC DESIGN PROPOSAL SET LAND USE SET191 EASTWOOD191 EASTWOOD ROADASPEN, CO 816111" ACTUAL IF THE ABOVE DIMENSION DOES NOT MEASURE ONE INCH (1") EXACTLY, THIS DRAWING WILL HAVE BEEN ENLARGED OR REDUCED, AFFECTING ALL LABELED SCALES. ALL DESIGNS, IDEAS ARRANGEMENTS AND PLANS INDICATED BY THESE DRAWINGS AND SPECIFICATIONS ARE THE PROPERTY AND COPYRIGHT OF KIM RAYMOND ARCHITECTS, INC. AND SHALL NEITHER BE USED ON ANY OTHER WORK NOR BE USED BY ANY OTHER PERSON FOR ANY USE WHATSOEVER WITHOUT WRITTEN PERMISSION. WRITTEN DIMENSIONS SHALL TAKE P R E C E D E N C E O V E R S C A L E D DIMENSIONS AND SHALL BE VERIFIED AT THE SITE . ANY DIMENSIONAL DISCREPANCY SHALL BE BROUGHT TO THE ATTENTION OF THE ARCHITECT PRIOR TO COMMENCEMENT OF WORK. A.2.03 11/15/21 EXISTING ROOF PLAN DATE 7/15/21 www.kimraymondarchitects.com 970-925-22527/30/21 11/12/21 C C A A 1 1 5 5 4 4 3 3 E E 2 2 B 1 A.3.012A.3.011 A.3.02 2A.3.01FLAT ROOFFLAT ROOFFLAT ROOFFLAT ROOF DECK BELOW STAIRS D D PROPERTY LINE PROPERTY LIN E SETBACK LINE SETBACK LINE SETBACK LINE N SCALE: 1/4" = 1'-0" 97 Scale: AS NOTED ISSUE SCHEMATIC DESIGN PROPOSAL SET LAND USE SET191 EASTWOOD191 EASTWOOD ROADASPEN, CO 816111" ACTUAL IF THE ABOVE DIMENSION DOES NOT MEASURE ONE INCH (1") EXACTLY, THIS DRAWING WILL HAVE BEEN ENLARGED OR REDUCED, AFFECTING ALL LABELED SCALES. ALL DESIGNS, IDEAS ARRANGEMENTS AND PLANS INDICATED BY THESE DRAWINGS AND SPECIFICATIONS ARE THE PROPERTY AND COPYRIGHT OF KIM RAYMOND ARCHITECTS, INC. AND SHALL NEITHER BE USED ON ANY OTHER WORK NOR BE USED BY ANY OTHER PERSON FOR ANY USE WHATSOEVER WITHOUT WRITTEN PERMISSION. WRITTEN DIMENSIONS SHALL TAKE P R E C E D E N C E O V E R S C A L E D DIMENSIONS AND SHALL BE VERIFIED AT THE SITE . ANY DIMENSIONAL DISCREPANCY SHALL BE BROUGHT TO THE ATTENTION OF THE ARCHITECT PRIOR TO COMMENCEMENT OF WORK. A.2.04 11/15/21 PROPOSED MAIN LEVEL PLAN DATE 7/15/21 www.kimraymondarchitects.com 970-925-22527/30/21 11/12/21 DOUBLE STACKED WASHER/DRYER D01GD1 D01GD1 D39 D39 D01 D01 D02 D01D01 D01D01D01D02 D02D01 D01 C C A A 5 5 4 4 3 3 6 6 E E 1 1 2 2 A1 B37'-4 1/4"4'-6"5'-8 1/4"4'-8"14'-10 1/2"7'-7 1/2"82'-5 5/8" 14'-6 3/8"29'-6 3/4"20'-6 1/2"17'-10" 82'-5 5/8" 14'-6 3/8"29'-6 3/4"20'-6 1/2"17'-10"37'-4 1/4"14'-10 1/4"14'-10 1/2"7'-7 1/2"28'-0" 28'-0" 28'-0" 28'-0" 1 A.3.012A.3.011 A.3.02 2A.3.01BEDROOM 2 BATH 1 BATH 2 MECHANICAL ROOM LAUNDRY ROOM ENTRY MUDROOM GARAGE PLANTER ENTRY PATIO SHOWER SHOWER WC STAIRWELL BEDROOM 1 STAIRS LOCKOFF STORAGE BIKES BENCHCUBBIES CLOSET CLOSET CLOSET PLANTER D D UP UP PROPERTY LINE SETBACK LINE SETBACK LINE SETBACK LINE PROPOSED SE T B A C K L I N E PROPOSED SETBACK LINE N SCALE: 1/4" = 1'-0" 98 Scale: AS NOTED ISSUE SCHEMATIC DESIGN PROPOSAL SET LAND USE SET191 EASTWOOD191 EASTWOOD ROADASPEN, CO 816111" ACTUAL IF THE ABOVE DIMENSION DOES NOT MEASURE ONE INCH (1") EXACTLY, THIS DRAWING WILL HAVE BEEN ENLARGED OR REDUCED, AFFECTING ALL LABELED SCALES. ALL DESIGNS, IDEAS ARRANGEMENTS AND PLANS INDICATED BY THESE DRAWINGS AND SPECIFICATIONS ARE THE PROPERTY AND COPYRIGHT OF KIM RAYMOND ARCHITECTS, INC. AND SHALL NEITHER BE USED ON ANY OTHER WORK NOR BE USED BY ANY OTHER PERSON FOR ANY USE WHATSOEVER WITHOUT WRITTEN PERMISSION. WRITTEN DIMENSIONS SHALL TAKE P R E C E D E N C E O V E R S C A L E D DIMENSIONS AND SHALL BE VERIFIED AT THE SITE . ANY DIMENSIONAL DISCREPANCY SHALL BE BROUGHT TO THE ATTENTION OF THE ARCHITECT PRIOR TO COMMENCEMENT OF WORK. A.2.05 11/15/21 PROPOSED UPPER LEVEL PLAN DATE 7/15/21 www.kimraymondarchitects.com 970-925-22527/30/21 11/12/21 TRASH W/D REF.D39W34 W34 W34 W34 W34 W34W34W34D01 W34W34 W34 W34W34 D39W34W34W34W34W34W34 D01 D01D01W34W34 D01D39D01 D02 D01D01C C A A 5 5 4 4 3 3 6 6 E E 1 1 2 2 A1 B 1 A.3.012A.3.011 A.3.02 2A.3.014'-2"12'-5 1/2"3'-5 1/2"6 3/4"11'-3 3/4"6 3/4" 82'-5 1/2" 14'-6 1/2"29'-6 3/4"20'-6 1/2"17'-10"37'-4 1/4"10'-2 1/4"4'-8"14'-10 1/2"7'-7 1/2"82'-5 1/2" 14'-6 1/2"29'-6 3/4"20'-6 1/2"17'-10"37'-4 1/4"10'-2 1/4"4'-8"14'-10 1/2"7'-7 1/2"4'-6"GYM MASTER CLOSET (HERS)MASTER BATHROOM MASTER BEDROOM LIVING ROOM MASTER CLOSET (HIS) WC STEAM POWDER OFFICE DECK KITCHEN GUEST MASTER CLOSET GUEST MASTER BATH GUEST MASTER BEDROOM PANTRY AND STORAGE DINING DW BUFFET W SHELVES ABOVE CHASE DW WINE REFRIG D D FRZ.DOUBLE OVENS DN UP BROOM CLOSET PROPERTY LINE PROPERTY LIN E SETBACK LINE SETBACK LINE SETBACK LINE PROPOSED SE T B A C K L I N E PROPOSED SETBACK LINE N SCALE: 1/4" = 1'-0" 99 Scale: AS NOTED ISSUE SCHEMATIC DESIGN PROPOSAL SET LAND USE SET191 EASTWOOD191 EASTWOOD ROADASPEN, CO 816111" ACTUAL IF THE ABOVE DIMENSION DOES NOT MEASURE ONE INCH (1") EXACTLY, THIS DRAWING WILL HAVE BEEN ENLARGED OR REDUCED, AFFECTING ALL LABELED SCALES. ALL DESIGNS, IDEAS ARRANGEMENTS AND PLANS INDICATED BY THESE DRAWINGS AND SPECIFICATIONS ARE THE PROPERTY AND COPYRIGHT OF KIM RAYMOND ARCHITECTS, INC. AND SHALL NEITHER BE USED ON ANY OTHER WORK NOR BE USED BY ANY OTHER PERSON FOR ANY USE WHATSOEVER WITHOUT WRITTEN PERMISSION. WRITTEN DIMENSIONS SHALL TAKE P R E C E D E N C E O V E R S C A L E D DIMENSIONS AND SHALL BE VERIFIED AT THE SITE . ANY DIMENSIONAL DISCREPANCY SHALL BE BROUGHT TO THE ATTENTION OF THE ARCHITECT PRIOR TO COMMENCEMENT OF WORK. A.2.06 11/15/21 PROPOSED ROOF PLAN DATE 7/15/21 www.kimraymondarchitects.com 970-925-22527/30/21 11/12/21 C C A A 5 5 4 4 3 3 6 6 E E 1 1 2 2 A1 B 1 A.3.012A.3.011 A.3.02 2A.3.01FLAT ROOFFLAT ROOFFLAT ROOF DECK BELOW SLOPED ROOF SLOPE 1" : 1'-0" D D PROPERTY LINE PROPERTY LIN E SETBACK LINE SETBACK LINE SETBACK LINE PROPOSED SE T B A C K L I N E PROPOSED SETBACK LINE N SCALE: 1/4" = 1'-0" 100 Scale: AS NOTED ISSUE SCHEMATIC DESIGN PROPOSAL SET LAND USE SET 1" ACTUAL IF THE ABOVE DIMENSION DOES NOT MEASURE ONE INCH (1") EXACTLY, THIS DRAWING WILL HAVE BEEN ENLARGED OR REDUCED, AFFECTING ALL LABELED SCALES. ALL DESIGNS, IDEAS ARRANGEMENTS AND PLANS INDICATED BY THESE DRAWINGS AND SPECIFICATIONS ARE THE PROPERTY AND COPYRIGHT OF KIM RAYMOND ARCHITECTS, INC. AND SHALL NEITHER BE USED ON ANY OTHER WORK NOR BE USED BY ANY OTHER PERSON FOR ANY USE WHATSOEVER WITHOUT WRITTEN PERMISSION. WRITTEN DIMENSIONS SHALL TAKE P R E C E D E N C E O V E R S C A L E D DIMENSIONS AND SHALL BE VERIFIED AT THE SITE . ANY DIMENSIONAL DISCREPANCY SHALL BE BROUGHT TO THE ATTENTION OF THE ARCHITECT PRIOR TO COMMENCEMENT OF WORK. A.3.01 11/15/21 EXISTING ELEVATIONS: SOUTH & WEST DATE www.kimraymondarchitects.com 970-925-2252191 EASTWOOD191 EASTWOOD ROADASPEN, CO 816117/15/21 7/30/21 11/12/21 5 5 4 4 3 3 2 2 1 1 T.O. EXST. GARAGE 100'-3 3/4" EXST. U.L. PLY 113'-1 1/8" T.O. EXST. MAIN LEVEL PLY 104'-4" T.O. EXISTING GARAGE 100'-3 3/4" EXISTING U.L. PLY 113'-1 1/8" T.O. EXISTING MAIN LEVEL PLY 104'-4" EXISTING MASTER PLY 116'-11 5/8" EXST. MASTER BATH PLY 116'-2 5/8" E E D D C C A A B B T.O. EXISTING GARAGE 100'-3 3/4" EXISTING U.L. PLY 113'-1 1/8" T.O. EXISTING MAIN LEVEL PLY 104'-4" T.O. EXISTING GARAGE 100'-3 3/4" EXISTING U.L. PLY 113'-1 1/8" T.O. EXISTING MAIN LEVEL PLY 104'-4" EXISTING MASTER PLY 116'-11 5/8" EXST. MASTER BATH PLY 116'-2 5/8" SCALE: 1/4" = 1'-0"1 EXISTING SOUTH ELEVATION SCALE: 1/4" = 1'-0"1 EXISTING WEST ELEVATION 101 Scale: AS NOTED ISSUE SCHEMATIC DESIGN PROPOSAL SET LAND USE SET 1" ACTUAL IF THE ABOVE DIMENSION DOES NOT MEASURE ONE INCH (1") EXACTLY, THIS DRAWING WILL HAVE BEEN ENLARGED OR REDUCED, AFFECTING ALL LABELED SCALES. ALL DESIGNS, IDEAS ARRANGEMENTS AND PLANS INDICATED BY THESE DRAWINGS AND SPECIFICATIONS ARE THE PROPERTY AND COPYRIGHT OF KIM RAYMOND ARCHITECTS, INC. AND SHALL NEITHER BE USED ON ANY OTHER WORK NOR BE USED BY ANY OTHER PERSON FOR ANY USE WHATSOEVER WITHOUT WRITTEN PERMISSION. WRITTEN DIMENSIONS SHALL TAKE P R E C E D E N C E O V E R S C A L E D DIMENSIONS AND SHALL BE VERIFIED AT THE SITE . ANY DIMENSIONAL DISCREPANCY SHALL BE BROUGHT TO THE ATTENTION OF THE ARCHITECT PRIOR TO COMMENCEMENT OF WORK. A.3.02 11/15/21 EXISTING ELEVATIONS: NORTH & EAST DATE www.kimraymondarchitects.com 970-925-2252191 EASTWOOD191 EASTWOOD ROADASPEN, CO 816117/15/21 7/30/21 11/12/21 1 1 2 2 3 3 4 4 5 5 T.O. EXST. GARAGE 100'-3 3/4" EXST. U.L. PLY 113'-1 1/8" T.O. EXST. MAIN LEVEL PLY 104'-4" T.O. EXISTING GARAGE 100'-3 3/4" EXISTING U.L. PLY 113'-1 1/8" T.O. EXST. MAIN LEVEL PLY 104'-4" EXISTING MASTER PLY 116'-11 5/8" EXST. MASTER BATH PLY 116'-2 5/8" A A B B C C D D E E T.O. EXISTING GARAGE 100'-3 3/4" EXISTING U.L. PLY 113'-1 1/8" T.O. EXISTING MAIN LEVEL PLY 104'-4" T.O. EXISTING GARAGE 100'-3 3/4" EXISTING U.L. PLY 113'-1 1/8" T.O. EXISTING MAIN LEVEL PLY 104'-4" EXISTING MASTER PLY 116'-11 5/8" EXST. MASTER BATH PLY 116'-2 5/8" SCALE: 1/4" = 1'-0"1 EXISTING NORTH ELEVATION SCALE: 1/4" = 1'-0"1 EXISTING EAST ELEVATION 102 Scale: AS NOTED ISSUE SCHEMATIC DESIGN PROPOSAL SET LAND USE SET 1" ACTUAL IF THE ABOVE DIMENSION DOES NOT MEASURE ONE INCH (1") EXACTLY, THIS DRAWING WILL HAVE BEEN ENLARGED OR REDUCED, AFFECTING ALL LABELED SCALES. ALL DESIGNS, IDEAS ARRANGEMENTS AND PLANS INDICATED BY THESE DRAWINGS AND SPECIFICATIONS ARE THE PROPERTY AND COPYRIGHT OF KIM RAYMOND ARCHITECTS, INC. AND SHALL NEITHER BE USED ON ANY OTHER WORK NOR BE USED BY ANY OTHER PERSON FOR ANY USE WHATSOEVER WITHOUT WRITTEN PERMISSION. WRITTEN DIMENSIONS SHALL TAKE P R E C E D E N C E O V E R S C A L E D DIMENSIONS AND SHALL BE VERIFIED AT THE SITE . ANY DIMENSIONAL DISCREPANCY SHALL BE BROUGHT TO THE ATTENTION OF THE ARCHITECT PRIOR TO COMMENCEMENT OF WORK. A.3.03 11/15/21 PROPOSED ELEVATIONS: SOUTH & WEST DATE www.kimraymondarchitects.com 970-925-2252191 EASTWOOD191 EASTWOOD ROADASPEN, CO 816117/15/21 7/30/21 11/12/21 6 6 5 5 4 4 3 3 2 2 1 1 EXST. U.L. PLY 113'-1 1/8" EXISTING U.L. PLY 113'-1 1/8" T.O. MASTER PLY 116'-2 5/8" PROPOSED GARAGE SLAB 100'-0" PROPOSED GARAGE SLAB 100'-0" PROPOSED M.L. PLY 102'-3 3/4" PROPOSED M.L. PLY 102'-3 3/4" E E D D C C A A B B A1 A1 EXISTING U.L. PLY 113'-1 1/8" EXISTING U.L. PLY 113'-1 1/8" PROPOSED GARAGE SLAB 100'-0" PROPOSED M.L. PLY 102'-3 3/4" PROPOSED GARAGE SLAB 100'-0" PROPOSED M.L. PLY 102'-3 3/4" T.O. MASTER PLY 116'-2 5/8" SCALE: 1/4" = 1'-0"1 PROPOSED SOUTH ELEVATION SCALE: 1/4" = 1'-0"2 PROPOSED WEST ELEVATION 103 Scale: AS NOTED ISSUE SCHEMATIC DESIGN PROPOSAL SET LAND USE SET 1" ACTUAL IF THE ABOVE DIMENSION DOES NOT MEASURE ONE INCH (1") EXACTLY, THIS DRAWING WILL HAVE BEEN ENLARGED OR REDUCED, AFFECTING ALL LABELED SCALES. ALL DESIGNS, IDEAS ARRANGEMENTS AND PLANS INDICATED BY THESE DRAWINGS AND SPECIFICATIONS ARE THE PROPERTY AND COPYRIGHT OF KIM RAYMOND ARCHITECTS, INC. AND SHALL NEITHER BE USED ON ANY OTHER WORK NOR BE USED BY ANY OTHER PERSON FOR ANY USE WHATSOEVER WITHOUT WRITTEN PERMISSION. WRITTEN DIMENSIONS SHALL TAKE P R E C E D E N C E O V E R S C A L E D DIMENSIONS AND SHALL BE VERIFIED AT THE SITE . ANY DIMENSIONAL DISCREPANCY SHALL BE BROUGHT TO THE ATTENTION OF THE ARCHITECT PRIOR TO COMMENCEMENT OF WORK. A.3.04 11/15/21 PROPOSED ELEVATIONS: NORTH & EAST DATE www.kimraymondarchitects.com 970-925-2252191 EASTWOOD191 EASTWOOD ROADASPEN, CO 816117/15/21 7/30/21 11/12/21 1 1 2 2 3 3 4 4 5 5 6 6 EXST. U.L. PLY 113'-1 1/8" EXISTING U.L. PLY 113'-1 1/8" T.O. MASTER PLY 116'-2 5/8" A A A1 A1 B B C C D D E E PROPOSED GARAGE SLAB 100'-0" PROPOSED M.L. PLY 102'-3 3/4" PROPOSED GARAGE SLAB 100'-0" PROPOSED M.L. PLY 102'-3 3/4" EXISTING U.L. PLY 113'-1 1/8" EXISTING U.L. PLY 113'-1 1/8" T.O. MASTER PLY 116'-2 5/8" SCALE: 1/4" = 1'-0"1 PROPOSED NORTH ELEVATION SCALE: 1/4" = 1'-0"1 PROPOSED EAST ELEVATION 104 EXHIBIT E 191 Eastwood Zoning Summary Minimum Gross Lot Area 15,000 sq. ft. Minimum Net Lot Area per dwelling 15,000 sq. ft. Minimum Lot width 75 ft. Minimum Front Yard Setback 30 ft. Minimum Side Yard Setbacks 5 ft. Minimum Rear Yard Setback 10 ft. Maximum Height Limit 25 ft. Gross Lot Area (per Survey) 14,858 sq. ft. Allowable Floor Area ( per Survey) 3,172 sq. ft. This lot is eligible for one TDR of 250 sq. ft. 105 Scale: AS NOTED ISSUE SCHEMATIC DESIGN PROPOSAL SET LAND USE SET 1" ACTUAL IF THE ABOVE DIMENSION DOES NOT MEASURE ONE INCH (1") EXACTLY, THIS DRAWING WILL HAVE BEEN ENLARGED OR REDUCED, AFFECTING ALL LABELED SCALES. ALL DESIGNS, IDEAS ARRANGEMENTS AND PLANS INDICATED BY THESE DRAWINGS AND SPECIFICATIONS ARE THE PROPERTY AND COPYRIGHT OF KIM RAYMOND ARCHITECTS, INC. AND SHALL NEITHER BE USED ON ANY OTHER WORK NOR BE USED BY ANY OTHER PERSON FOR ANY USE WHATSOEVER WITHOUT WRITTEN PERMISSION. WRITTEN DIMENSIONS SHALL TAKE P R E C E D E N C E O V E R S C A L E D DIMENSIONS AND SHALL BE VERIFIED AT THE SITE . ANY DIMENSIONAL DISCREPANCY SHALL BE BROUGHT TO THE ATTENTION OF THE ARCHITECT PRIOR TO COMMENCEMENT OF WORK. A.1.03 11/15/21 EXISTING FAR CALCULATIONS DATE www.kimraymondarchitects.com 970-925-2252191 EASTWOOD191 EASTWOOD ROADASPEN, CO 816117/15/21 7/30/21 11/12/21 EXISTING FLOOR AREA CALCULATIONS CITY OF ASPEN ZONING SUBMISSION SUBGRADE LEVEL WALL LABEL TOTAL WALL AREA (SQ. FT.) EXPOSED WALL AREA (SQ. FT.) 1 337 84 2 236 69 3 305 289 4 160 160 5 121 121 6 118 118 OVERALL TOTAL WALL AREA (SQ. FT.)1277 EXPOSED WALL AREA (SQ. FT.)841 % OF EXPOSED WALL (EXPOSED/TOTAL)65.86% SUBGRADE GROSS FLOOR AREA (SQ. FT.)605 SUBGRADE COUNTABLE FLOOR AREA (SQ. FT.)398.44 LOWER LEVEL FLOOR AREA (SQ. FT.) 0 MAIN LEVEL FLOOR AREA (SQ. FT.)399 UPPER LEVEL FLOOR AREA (SQ. FT.)1673 GARAGE FLOOR AREA 0 DECK FLOOR AREA (15% OF 3172 = 475) 604 SQ. FT. 129 EXEMPT TOTAL EXISTING FLOOR AREA (SQ. FT.)2201 (3172 ALLOWED) TOTAL EXISTING FLOOR AREA CALCULATIONS EXISTING SUBGRADE LEVEL EXPOSED WALL CALCULATIONS 305 sq ft 84 sq ft 236 sq ft 289 sq ft 160 sq ft 121 sq ft 118 sq ft 337 sq ft 1 2 3 4 5 6 69 sq ft1,105 sq ft GROSS 22 sq ftD01 D01D07 D07 D07D07237 sq ft (-500 EXEMPT) 0 sq ft 65.86 EXPOSED WALL 1,105 GROSS SQ FT - 500 GARAGE =605 SQ FT * .6586 = 399 SQ FT 133 sq ft W50D02W50 W50 W50 W50 W50 W50W50W50W50 W50 W50W50W50W50W50W50 D07 D07D07 D07D02 D07W50D02D02D02D02D07 1,673 sq ft 449 sq ft SCALE: 3/16" = 1'-0"2 FAR ELEVATIONS SCALE: 3/16" = 1'-0"1 EXISTING MAIN LEVEL FAR SCALE: 3/16" = 1'-0"3 EXISTING UPPER LEVEL FAR 106 Scale: AS NOTED ISSUE SCHEMATIC DESIGN PROPOSAL SET LAND USE SET 1" ACTUAL IF THE ABOVE DIMENSION DOES NOT MEASURE ONE INCH (1") EXACTLY, THIS DRAWING WILL HAVE BEEN ENLARGED OR REDUCED, AFFECTING ALL LABELED SCALES. ALL DESIGNS, IDEAS ARRANGEMENTS AND PLANS INDICATED BY THESE DRAWINGS AND SPECIFICATIONS ARE THE PROPERTY AND COPYRIGHT OF KIM RAYMOND ARCHITECTS, INC. AND SHALL NEITHER BE USED ON ANY OTHER WORK NOR BE USED BY ANY OTHER PERSON FOR ANY USE WHATSOEVER WITHOUT WRITTEN PERMISSION. WRITTEN DIMENSIONS SHALL TAKE P R E C E D E N C E O V E R S C A L E D DIMENSIONS AND SHALL BE VERIFIED AT THE SITE . ANY DIMENSIONAL DISCREPANCY SHALL BE BROUGHT TO THE ATTENTION OF THE ARCHITECT PRIOR TO COMMENCEMENT OF WORK. A.1.04 11/15/21 PROPOSED FAR CALCULATIONS DATE www.kimraymondarchitects.com 970-925-2252191 EASTWOOD191 EASTWOOD ROADASPEN, CO 816117/15/21 7/30/21 11/12/21D01GD1D01GD1 D39 D39 D01 D01 1,753 sq ft GROSS 649 sq ft (500 sq ft EXEMPT) (149 sq ft) 225 sq ft > 5'-6" (EXEMPT) UP UP 57.23 EXPOSED WALL 1,753 GROSS SQ FT - 500 GARAGE =1,253 SQ FT * .5817 = 729 SQ FT D39W34 W34 W34 W34 W34 W34W34W34 W34W34 W34 W34W34 D39W34W34W34W34W34W34W34W34 D392,294 sq ft 411 sq ft62 sq ftDN UP 285 sq ft 85 sq ft 268 sq ft 272 sq ft 28 sq ft 16 sq ft 338 sq ft 116 sq ft 22 sq ft 336 sq ft143 sq ft 432 sq ft 283 sq ft 142 sq ft 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 SCALE: 3/16" = 1'-0"1 PROPOSED MAIN LEVEL FAR SCALE: 3/16" = 1'-0"3 PROPOSED UPPER LEVEL FAR SCALE: 3/16" = 1'-0"2 FAR ELEVATIONS 107 108 109 110 111 112 Michelle Bonfils March 14, 2022 Amy Simon Community Development RE: 191 Edgewood Special Review Dear Michelle, Amy and Members of P&Z Commission I would like to start by stating that I appreciate the efforts of staff to hold tight to the code and zoning regulations. I also would like us all to take a step back, or take a higher view than just the literal interpretation of the code. If we could take the bird’s eye view for a moment and look not only at this parcel and this zone district, but at the Aspen Area Community Plan and the greater goals of the community and code. I would like to review a few of the sections in the Aspen Area Community Plan, to shed light on why we believe our proposal meets the criteria for variances. Indeed, the reason we have the Planning & Zoning Commission is so there can be some flexibility for parcels that come for review; understanding that sometimes a variance meets the greater goals of the community than the strict enforcement of the ‘letter of the law’. I’ve highlighted in yellow the goals that we are meeting throughout the sections outlined below, for ease and efficiency. “Managing Growth for Community and Economic Sustainability”, for Residential development, the goals are to: III.1. Protect the visual quality and character of neighborhoods by minimizing site coverage, mass and scale. III.2. Control the location and limit the mass and scale of homes in order to: • Protect the natural visual quality and scenic value of river corridors and mountainsides, while also preventing environmental degradation and protecting water quality. • Protect our small town community character and historical heritage. • Limit consumption of energy and building materials. • Limit the burden on public infrastructure and ongoing public operating costs. • Reduce short- and long-term job generation impacts, such as traffic congestion and demand for affordable housing. • Limit zoning variances to reduce impacts on the neighborhood and the community. • Limit site coverage. “Environmental Stewardship” section has many goals, but the ones that are most relevant for our conversation are: • The treatment of run-off before it reaches riparian areas, a problem that is heightened when development occurs on steep slopes and in riparian areas. • The generation of substantial 113 amounts of demolition debris, a long-term problem due to strong trends towards residential redevelopment, and the impact on our limited landfill. • Excessive energy consumption, including extensive snow melting, outdoor pools and spas, etc. If we look at the proposal for the remodel of this home through the filter of these two sections, it becomes apparent that the goal of this project, while increasing the size of the home to meet the needs of the new family, it is also to protect the environment, enhance the look of the landscape and property for the neighborhood, preserve undisturbed open space and prevent unnecessary load on the land fill. They say that renovation is far better method of energy conservation than tearing down and replacing a building, so that is what we are doing here. As can be seen by the proposed package, the design has limited the demolition to just the exterior stairs and a portion of the deck.... lessening the impact on the land fill and the number of trips up and down the valley to the land fill, saving energy and helping with the air quality. The drainage around the home with the removal of the rip rap wall and restoration of the natural grade behind the new garage, will increase the water quality with on-site mitigation and will address the degradation of the hillside where the hillside was just cut back with no regard for soil conservation in the past. The visual quality of the mountainside will be enhanced in this restoration. The hardships endured on this lot from the change of the front yard setback from County to City have made keeping the existing home far more challenging. The resulting narrow building envelope encourages far more site disturbance by forcing the home to be longer in the East/West direction and would require the complete excavation and regrading of the west side of the lot. We prefer to seek the small setback for the rear of the building to preserve the natural visual quality and scenic value of the lot. The small variance for the living area to the rear setback of 29 sq ft (on two stories, with one story completely subgrade at the area of the variance) will also minimize site coverage. This will benefit the neighbors visually and will help the community by meeting the AACP goals for energy efficiency, have less construction impact, reduce site disturbance and site coverage far more than sticking to the exact letter of the code. The biggest part of the front yard variance we are requesting is to legalize the existing non- conformity. The rest of the front yard setbacks is to allow for larger overhangs which have been proven to save energy by limiting the direct sunlight in the summers, saving cooling costs. The addition of this overhang, is not adding any further living area, just making for a more energy efficient home. Please review closely the plat for the Edgewood subdivision. The hardship of loosing 3368 sq ft of developable land area in the building envelope is real because the home is already built to former County setbacks. The resulting depth of the new building envelope will not 114 even accommodate a standard sized garage. You may be thinking that the garage could simply be pulled closer to the front setback line to solve the issue; we did explore that option. This will cause far more grading to both the west and south sides of the lot. In our opinion, the small variance to the rear yard setback is the most compatible solution to the hardship that this lot faces, by allowing the use of the existing area of disturbance and saving the natural, wild surroundings and forest. If this home were to be completely demolished so as to design a new home within the current setbacks, it would be tricky, but achievable. This option fills the landfill with the entire home and forces a design that covers much more of the site and disturbs far more of the existing forest in this environmentally sensitive area. I mention the Review Process section as I feel like it is important for citizens to be able to expect reasonable and conscientious administration of the codes. Sine this home was built within the required setbacks and now finds itself non-conforming, the owner should not be penalized for wanting to bring his home into compliance and make it more energy efficient. Since we are extremely limited on time, I would like to also clarify a few comments made in the memo so they can be adjusted before this packet goes to the Commission. It is easier to get it done now, than have to explain the mistakes at the meeting. Exhibit A Staff Findings (a) Dimensional requirements (1)The mass, ht, density, configuration and amount of open space, landscaping and setbacks of the proposed development are designed in a manner which is compatible with or enhances the character of surrounding land uses and is consistent with the purposes of the underlying zone district: The City granted the exclusion of floor area reduction for steep slopes in the R-15B zone district for good reason, most of the subdivision is steep. The mention of this in the memo is not relevant, as we are not asking for a variance in our allowed floor area and what is required in other zone districts doesn’t apply here. This just adds confusion, it is cherry picking... as we are not comparing what is allowed in R-15 B with other zone districts. If that is the case, we could argue that other zone districts in the City only require a 10’ front yard setback.... This same reasoning holds true for the 8040 Greenline Review. R-15B is exempt from this requirement and should not be brought into the discussion. It has accurately been depicted that the existing conditions with the dimension between the corners of the two homes as being less than 20’. This too is true, but also irrelevant, as this is existing, and we are not proposing to replace this tiny corner of 5 sq. ft. that protrudes past the setback line. We were just seeking to adjust the setback line here, so as to make it conforming while we are going through this process. If there is only 17’-2” of space between the homes 115 and our building is less than a foot over the setback, then the neighbor’s home is also past it’s rear yard setback, and we have no control over that. Where we are asking for the variance, is on the west side of the home, where it is not directly below the home above..... it is shown on the slide that the homes are over 30’ apart where the new addition is proposed. We are only asking for 1’-9” setback at the worse case along the rear setback. The original home was not built parallel to the setback line thus making our request for this setback a little pie shaped sliver starting at 21” and diminishing to nothing in over the length of the garage. This is also where the depth of the building envelope is a hardship for this lot. I realize the code says that reducing non-conformities in one area of a home does not justify increasing it in another area. We are not increasing an existing non-conformity here, but are asking for a very small variance. We believe the benefits to the neighborhood and the community far outweigh the cons for this variance request, and it is a very small concession for the hardship endured by the loss of usable building envelope. They lost 3368 sq ft, and we are only asking for a 29 sq ft footprint and roof overhangs. It is for situations like this that the review process was conceived. 26.575.020 e. Measuring Setbacks 5. Allowed Projections into setbacks g. Building eaves, bay windows, window sills, and similar architectural projections up to 18” from the setback boundary, so our ask in the variance does not include the entire roof. We have re-drawn our proposed setback line request to be only 2” beyond the framing to allow for siding at the rear. And we have tightened the request to within 18” of the proposed roof overhang. As shown in the section just above, this 18” allowance for overhangs makes our ask for the roof overhang smaller. The need for the overhang is for energy efficiency reasons. The other things to review in staff’s response. 1. The rear yard setback variance is only 1’-9”, not 5’-0 as noted. 2. Staff’s claim that we propose to expand the livable area into the front yard by 88 sq. ft. of livable area. We are not asking for any livable area in the front. We are asking to bring the existing non-conformity into conformity and asking for a roof overhang. This will not have any adverse affects on the neighborhood or community. Indeed, the more energy efficient home will be a benefit. Also as mentioned above, this lot endures a large hardship, unlike all the other lots in the Eastwood Subdivision, and is being deprived of basic rights by not allowing a larger roof overhang for energy conservation reasons. 3. on Page 17, first full paragraph, staff claims that we are asking for new living area that will sit 3’ into the front yard setback. We are not asking for any living area to be in the front yard setback. We have also reduced the rear yard setback to 1’-9”. 116 The next paragraph states that the enlarged structure at the front facade needs a critival review to gain a variance. That is why we are here, going through this review process. The necessity of the enlarged structure is to provide a needed roof overhang to the existing building where now there is only a few inches. The request stems from the desire to make the home more energy efficient. Our hardship is the changed setback from County to City, where this building is already constructed... under the original setbacks, a large overhang would have fit easily. At this point we cannot move the house. I understand that the “intent” of the non-conformities section of the LUC are to reduce them; but in this case what is more critical and important in the long run... meeting the goals of the AACP and making the home more energy efficient or not allowing a variance that allows the roof overhang... not living area. The remainder of the first paragraph on page 20 states that the City’s goal is to reduce environmental impacts of development in this subdivision. Not granting the variance for a larger roof overhang into the new setback is actually going against the goals of the City in this regard. We are asking for the minimum variance to make possible reasonable use of the parcel and existing building. The hardship of the new, very shallow building envelope, again is very real here. The expansion of the roof overhang will not cause any further disruption in this environmentally sensitive area.... just add to the energy efficiency of the existing home. In the paragraph 3. Literal Interpretation... please look again at the plat of the subdivision where it is clearly shown that the move of the front yard setback had a more adverse affect on this lot, than any other in the neighborhood. Since this lot is parallel to the road and was originally platted as much more shallow than other lots, the shift in the front yard setback resulted in an almost 40% reduction of buildable area and put the existing home outside the new setback. This is a hardship that none of the other lots endure. There is ample room for all of the other lots to expand their roof overhangs if desired... even expand their foot prints; but not so for this lot; and this limits the ability of this homeowner to make his home more energy efficient. Thank you for taking the time to read and contemplate this letter. My team looks forward to working with the City on another great project. Respectfully, Kim Raymond Kim Raymond Kim Raymond Architecture + Interiors 117 191 EASTWOOD DRIVE EASTWOOD D R I V E FRONT PROPE R T Y L I N E REAR PROPERTY LINE SIDE PROPERTY L INESIDE PROPERTY LINE18,661 sq ft SCALE: 1/8" = 1'-0"1 ORIGINAL PROPERTY LINE 118 191 EASTWOOD DRIVE 8,710 sq ft 30'-0"10'-0"5'-0" 5'-0" EASTWOOD D R I V E FRONT PROPE R T Y L I N E REAR PROPERTY LINE SIDE PROPERTY L INESIDE PROPERTY LINE18,661 sq ft SCALE: 1/8" = 1'-0"1 ORIGINAL PROPERTY W/ ORIGINAL SETBACK 119 191 EASTWOOD DRIVE 8,710 sq ft 30'-0"10'-0"5'-0" 5'-0" DASH INDICATES WALL BELOW AREA OF EXISTING NON-CONFORMITY AREA OF EXISTING NON-CONFORMITY AREA OF EXISTING STEEP GRADING, EXCEEDS 30" OF ALLOWABLE GRADING WITHIN SETBACK EASTWOOD D R I V E FRONT PROPE R T Y L I N E REAR PROPERTY LINE SIDE PROPERTY L INESIDE PROPERTY LINE18,661 sq ft CURRENT BUILDING FOOTPRINT SCALE: 1/8" = 1'-0"1 ORIGINAL PROPERTY W/ ORIGINAL SETBACK & CURRENT FOOTPRINT 120 191 EASTWOOD DRIVE 14,858 sq ft EASTWOOD D R I V E FRONT PROPE R T Y L I N E REAR PROPERTY LINE SIDE PROPERTY L INESIDE PROPERTY LINE39% OF ORIGINAL AREA SCALE: 1/8" = 1'-0"1 CURRENT PROPERTY LINE 121 191 EASTWOOD DRIVE 14,858 sq ft 5,342 sq ft 3,368 sq ft REMOVED FROM BUILDING ENVELOPE10'-0"SETBACK5'-0" SETBACK 5'-0"SETBA C K 30'-0"SETBACK15'-0"CHANGE INPROPERTY LINE15'-0"CHANGE INSETBACK LINE59'-10 1/2"15'-2 1/8"59'-10 7/8 "15'-1 1/8 " EASTWOOD D R I V E FRONT PROPE R T Y L I N E REAR PROPERTY LINE SIDE PROPERTY L INESIDE PROPERTY LINE39% OF ORIGINAL AREA SCALE: 1/8" = 1'-0"1 CURRENT PROPERTY W/ CURRENT SETBACK 122 191 EASTWOOD DRIVE 14,858 sq ft 5,342 sq ft 3,368 sq ft REMOVED FROM BUILDING ENVELOPE10'-0"SETBACK5'-0" SETBACK 5'-0"SETBA C K 30'-0"SETBACK15'-0"CHANGE INPROPERTY LINE15'-0"CHANGE INSETBACK LINE59'-10 1/2"15'-2 1/8"59'-10 7/8 "15'-1 1/8 " DASH INDICATES WALL BELOW AREA OF EXISTING NON-CONFORMITY AREA OF EXISTING NON-CONFORMITY AREA OF EXISTING STEEP GRADING, EXCEEDS 30" OF ALLOWABLE GRADING WITHIN SETBACK EASTWOOD D R I V E FRONT PROPE R T Y L I N E REAR PROPERTY LINE SIDE PROPERTY L INESIDE PROPERTY LINE39% OF ORIGINAL AREA CURRENT BUILDING FOOTPRINT SCALE: 1/8" = 1'-0"1 CURRENT PROPERTY W/ CURRENT SETBACK & CURRENT FOOTPRINT 123 191 EASTWOOD DRIVE 14,858 sq ft 5,342 sq ft 41 sq ft 3,368 sq ft REMOVED FROM BUILDING ENVELOPE10'-0"SETBACK5'-0" SETBACK 5'-0"SETBA C K 30'-0"SETBACK15'-0"CHANGE INPROPERTY LINE15'-0"CHANGE INSETBACK LINE59'-10 1/2"15'-2 1/8"59'-10 7/8 "15'-1 1/8 " 11 1/8" VARIANCE 9'-5" VARIANCE6'-3 3/8"VARIANCE36'-3 5/8" 28'-4 5/8" VARIANCE DASH INDICATES WALL BELOW AREA OF EXISTING NON-CONFORMITY DECK REDUCTION AREA OF EXISTING NON-CONFORMITY AREA OF RIP RAP WALL TO BE RETURNED TO NATURAL GRADE AT NEW FOUNDATION AND RETAINING WALL AREA OF VARIANCE FOR ROOF OVERHANG AREA OF VARIANCE AREA OF EXISTING NON-CONFORMITY EASTWOOD D R I V E FRONT PROPE R T Y L I N E REAR PROPERTY LINE SIDE PROPERTY L INESIDE PROPERTY LINE39% OF ORIGINAL AREA PROPOSED SE T B A C K L I N E PROPOSED SE T B A C K L I N E PROPOSED SETBACK LINE EXISTING/PR O P O S E D S E T B A C K L I N E PROPOSEDSETBACK LINE1'-9" VARIANCE 29 sq ft 2.83 sq ft PROPOSED BUILDING FOOTPRINT SCALE: 1/8" = 1'-0"1 CURRENT PROPERTY W/ CURRENT/PROPOSED SETBACK & PROPOSED FOOTPRINT 124 Scale: AS NOTED ISSUE SCHEMATIC DESIGN PROPOSAL SET LAND USE SET 1" ACTUAL IF THE ABOVE DIMENSION DOES NOT MEASURE ONE INCH (1") EXACTLY, THIS DRAWING WILL HAVE BEEN ENLARGED OR REDUCED, AFFECTING ALL LABELED SCALES. ALL DESIGNS, IDEAS ARRANGEMENTS AND PLANS INDICATED BY THESE DRAWINGS AND SPECIFICATIONS ARE THE PROPERTY AND COPYRIGHT OF KIM RAYMOND ARCHITECTS, INC. AND SHALL NEITHER BE USED ON ANY OTHER WORK NOR BE USED BY ANY OTHER PERSON FOR ANY USE WHATSOEVER WITHOUT WRITTEN PERMISSION. WRITTEN DIMENSIONS SHALL TAKE P R E C E D E N C E O V E R S C A L E D DIMENSIONS AND SHALL BE VERIFIED AT T H E S I T E . A N Y D I M E N S I O N A L DISCREPANCY SHALL BE BROUGHT TO THE ATTENTION OF THE ARCHITECT PRIOR TO COMMENCEMENT OF WORK. A 0.1 3/14/22 GENERAL INFORMATION DATE www.kimraymondarchitects.com 970-925-2252191 EASTWOOD191 EASTWOOD ROADASPEN, CO 816117/15/21 7/30/21 11/12/21 CONTRACTOR - - STRUCTURAL ENGINEER - - CIVIL ENGINEER - - MECHANICAL ENGINEER G.1.01 GENERAL INFORMATION SURVEY INTERPOLATED GRADE SURVEY A.1.01 EXISTING SITE PLAN A.1.02 PROPOSED SITE PLAN A.1.03 EXISTING FAR CALCULATIONS A.1.04 PROPOSED FAR CALCULATIONS A.2.01 EXISTING MAIN LEVEL PLAN A.2.02 EXISTING UPPER LEVEL PLAN A.2.03 EXISTING ROOF PLAN A.2.04 PROPOSED MAIN LEVEL PLAN A.2.05 PROPOSED UPPER LEVEL PLAN A.2.06 PROPOSED ROOF PLAN A.3.01 EXISTING ELEVATIONS: SOUTH & WEST A.3.02 EXISTING ELEVATIONS: NORTH & EAST A.3.03 PROPOSED ELEVATIONS: SOUTH & WEST A.3.04 PROPOSED ELEVATIONS: NORTH & EAST - - 13 4 2 1 A7.1 LOCATION KIM RAYMOND ARCHITECTS, INC. 802 EAST COOPER AVE #4 ASPEN, CO 81611 970-925-2252 ARCHITECT 191 EASTWOOD ABBREVIATIONS MATERIAL LEGEND VICINITY MAP PROJECT TEAMAPPLICABLE CODES PROJECT DATA SHEET INDEX (CONTINUED) SHEET INDEXSYMBOL LEGEND Subdivision: CITY AND TOWNSITE OF ASPEN Block: 120 Lot: F & G PARCEL ID NUMBER: ZONING: LOT SIZE: BLDG USE: OCC. GROUP: CONST. TYPE: CLIMATE ZONE: FIRE SPRINKLERS: LAND USE CATEGORY: TOWNSHIP: RANGE: SECTION: - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - PLT. S.T.D.SLOPE TO DRAIN A A.B. A.F.F. A.F.G. A/C ABC ABS ABV. ACB ACOU. ACT ADD. AG AHU AL. or ALUM. ALT. ANL ASPH. AVG AWG B.M. B.N. B.O. B.O.F. B.U. B/C BD. BLDG BLK. BLKG. BM. BR BRG. BRZ C.A.P. C.D. C.I.P. C.J. C.O. C.T. CAB CAM. CCTV CEM. CER CFM CH CKT. BKR. CL or C.L. CLG. CLKG. CLO. CLR. CMU CNTRD. COL. COMB. CONC. CONST. CONT. CONTR. CU d D.F. D.G. D.S. D/W DBL. DEMO DIA. or Ø DIAG. DIM. DL DN. DR E.A. E.F. E.J. E.N. E.W. EA. EL ELECT. ELEV. EMC EMT ENT EQ. EQUIP. EST. EVAP. EWC EXC EXH. EXIST. or E EXT. F.A. F.C. F.C.O. F.D. F.E. F.N. F.O. F.S. F/G FAB. FACP FDC FDN. FHC FIN. FL FLG. FLUOR. FP FTG. FURN. G.I. GA. GALV. GAR. GFCI GFI GL GLB GM GM GRC GYP. GYP. BD. H.B. H.C. H.M. H/C HDBD. HDW HGT. HOR. HTR HVAC HW HYD. I.C. I.D. I.F. ID IG IMC IMPG INCL. INSUL. INT. J-BOX JCT JT. K-D KD KO L.E.D. L.FT. LAM LAT. LAV LD. LIN. LINO. LT. LTG. LVL M.B. M.H. M.I. M.O. MAR. MAS. MAT'L MAX. MECH. MED. MFG. MFR. MIN. MISC. MOD MTL. MUL N.I.C. N.T.S. NCM NFC NLR. NO. NOM. O.C. O.D. O.H. O.I. O.R. OAI OH OPNG. OPPO. P.C. P.L. P.LAM. P.O.C. PERP. or PH or Ø PL. PLAS. PLUMB. PLYWD. PORC. PERF. PREFAB. PSF PSI PTN. PVC PWR. Q.T. QTY. R R.D.L. R.D.O. R.O. R.O.W. or R/W REF REF. REINF. REQ'D. RET. REV. RM RMV. S.C. S.D. S.O.V. S/L S/S SC SCHED. SECT. SES SH SHT'G. SIM. SPA. SPECS SPKR. SQ. FT. SQ. IN. STC STD. STL. SUSP. SW SYM SYS. T & G T.B. T.M.B. T.O. T.O.B. T.O.C. T.O.F. T.O.J. T.O.M. T.O.S. T.O.W. T.S. T.V. TEL. TH. THD. THK. THRU TLT. TRANS. TYP. UNF. UR V.B. V.I.F. VA VERT. WC WDW WCT WP WT. W/ W/O WD. W.I. YD. AMPERES ANCHOR BOLT ABOVE FINISHED FLOOR ABOVE FINISHED GRADE AIR CONDITIONING AGGREGATE BASE COURSE ACRYLONITRILE-BUTADIENE-STYRENE ABOVE ASBESTOS-CEMENT BOARD ACOUSTIC ACOUSTICAL CEILING TILE ADDITION or ADDENDUM ABOVE GRADE AIR HANDLER UNIT ALUMINUM ALTERNATE ANNEALED ASPHALT AVERAGE AMERICAN WIRE GAUGE ANGLE BENCH MARK BOUNDARY NAILING BOTTOM OF BOTTOM OF FOOTING BUILT UP BACK OF CURB BOARD BUILDING BLOCK BLOCKING BEAM BRASS BEARING BRONZE CONCRETE ASBESTOS PIPE CONSTRUCTION DOCUMENTS CAST IN PLACE CONTROL JOINT CLEAN OUT CERAMIC TILE CABINET CAMBER CLOSED CIRCUIT TELEVISION CEMENT CERAMIC CUBIC FEET PER MINUTE CHANNEL CIRCUIT BREAKER CENTERLINE CEILING CAULKING CLOSET CLEAR CONCRETE MASONRY UNIT CENTERED COLUMN COMBINATION CONCRETE CONSTRUCTION CONTINUOUS CONTRACTOR COPPER PENNY DRINKING FOUNTAIN DECOMPOSED GRANITE DOWN SPOUT DISHWASHER DOUBLE DEMOLITION DIAMETER DIAGONAL DIMENSION DEAD LOAD DOWN DOOR EXPANSION ANCHOR EXHAUST FAN EXPANSION JOINT END NAILING EACH WAY EACH ELEVATION "ELECTRIC, ELECTRICAL" ELEVATOR ELECTRICAL METALLIC CONDUIT ELECTRICAL METALLIC TUBING ELECTRICAL NON-METALLIC TUBING EQUAL EQUIPMENT ESTIMATE EVAPORATIVE COOLER ELECTRIC DRINKING COOLER EXCAVATE EXHAUST EXISTING EXTERIOR FIRE ALARM FAN COIL FLOOR CLEAN OUT FLOOR DRAIN FIRE EXTINGUISHER FIELD NAILING FACE OF FLOOR SINK FIBERGLASS FABRICATE FIRE ALARM CONTROL PANEL FIRE DEPARTMENT CONNECTION FOUNDATION FIRE HOSE CABINET FINISH FLOOR FLOORING FLUORESCENT FIRE PROOF FOOTING FURNISH GALVANIZED IRON GAUGE GALVANIZED GARAGE GROUND FAULT CIRCUIT INTERRUPTER GROUND FAULT INTERRUPTER GLASS GLUE LAMINATED BEAM GRADE MARK GATE VALVE GALVANIZED RIGID TUBING GYPSUM GYPSUM BOARD HOSE BIBB HOLLOW CORE HOLLOW METAL HANDICAPPED HARDBOARD HARDWARE HEIGHT HORIZONTAL HEATER HEATING, VENTILATING & AIR CONDITIONING HOT WATER HYDRAULIC INTERCOM OUTLET INSIDE DIAMETER INSIDE FACE IDENTIFICATION ISOLATED GROUND INTERMEDIATE METALLIC CONDUIT IMPREGNATED INCLUDE, INCLUSIVE INSULATION INTERIOR JUNCTION BOX JUNCTION JOINT KNOCK DOWN KILN DRIED KNOCK OUT LIGHT EMITTING DIODE LINEAR FEET LAMINATE LATERAL LAVATORY LEAD LINEAR LINOLEUM LIGHT LIGHTING LAMINATED VENEER LUMBER MACHINE BOLT MANHOLE MALLEABLE IRON MASONRY OPENING MARBLE MASONRY MATERIAL MAXIMUM MECHANICAL MEDIUM MANUFACTURING MANUFACTURER MINIMUM MISCELLANEOUS MODULAR METAL MULLION NOT IN CONTRACT NOT TO SCALE NON-CORROSIVE METAL NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION NAILER NUMBER NOMINAL ON CENTER OUTSIDE DIAMETER OVER HANG ORNAMENTAL IRON OUTSIDE RADIUS OUTSIDE AIR INTAKE OVER HEAD OPENING OPPOSITE PRECAST CONCRETE PROPERTY LINE PLASTIC LAMINATE POINT OF CONNECTION PERPENDICULAR PHASE PLASTER PLATE PLASTIC PLUMBING PLYWOOD PORCELAIN PERFORATED PREFABRICATED POUNDS PER SQUARE FOOT POUNDS PER SQUARE INCH PARTITION POLYVINYLCLORIDE POWER QUARRY TILE QUANTITY RADIUS ROOF DRAIN LEADER ROOF DRAIN OVERFLOW ROUGH OPENING RIGHT OF WAY REFRIGERATOR REFERENCE REINFORCED REQUIRED RETURN REVISION ROOM REMOVE SOLID CORE SMOKE DETECTOR SHUT OFF VALVE SKYLIGHT STAINLESS STEEL SELF CLOSING SCHEDULE SECTION SERVICE ENTRANCE SECTION SHEET SHEATHING SIMILAR SPACE SPECIFICATIONS SPEAKER SQUARE FEET SQUARE INCHES SOUND TRANSMISSION CLASS STANDARD STEEL SUSPENDED SWITCH SYMMETRICAL SYSTEM TONGUE AND GROOVE THROUGH BOLT TELEPHONE MOUNTING BOARD TOP OF TOP OF BEAM TOP OF CURB TOP OF FOOTING TOP OF JOIST TOP OF MASONRY TOP OF SLAB TOP OF WALL TUBE STEEL TELEVISION OUTLET TELEPHONE THRESHOLD THREADED THICK THROUGH TOILET TRANSFORMER TYPICAL UNFINISHED URINAL VAPOR BARRIER VERIFY IN FIELD VOLT AMPERE VERTICAL WATER CLOSET WINDOW WAINSCOT WEATHER PROOF WEIGHT WITH WITHOUT WOOD WROUGHT IRON YARD VCT VINYL COMPOSITION TILE JOISTJST. ALL CODES REFERENCED ARE TO BE USED AS AMENDED BY THE STATE OF COLORADO AND LOCAL JURISDICTION. NOTE: CODES BELOW ARE APPLICABLE ONLY IN AREAS. BECAUSE THE SCOPE OF WORK IS LESS THAN 40%, THE PROJECT IS NOT SUBJECT TO UPDATE TO CURRENT CODE -2015 INTERNATIONAL RESIDENTIAL CODE -2015 INTERNATION MECHANICAL CODE -2015 INTERNATIONAL PLUMBING CODE -2015 INTERNATIONAL FUEL & GAS CODE -2015 IECC (INTERNATIONAL ENERGY CONSERVATION CODE) - PITKIN COUNTY EFFICIENT BUILDING CODE -2014 NATIONAL ELECTRICAL CODE FINISH WOOD WOOD STUD BLOCKING STEEL STEEL STUD FRAMED WALL BATT INSULATION PLYWOOD CONCRETE STONE CMU SAND GRAVEL GWB COMPACTED SOIL SPRAY-FOAM INSULATION RIGID INSULATION GRID LINE BREAK LINE MATCH LINE REVISION A-701 ELEVATION MARKER SECTION MARKER DETAIL CUT DETAIL 1 A-501 ELEVATION D01 W01 ROOM NAME 101 INTERIOR ELEVATION MARKER ELEVATION NUMBER SHEET NUMBER SECTION NUMBER SHEET NUMBER DETAIL NUMBER SHEET NUMBER SHEET NUMBER ELEVATION NUMBER SPOT ELEVATION DOOR MARK WINDOW MARK ROOM NAME AND NUMBER 1 A-301 1 A-201 11 MAXIMUM FLOOR AREA: - - SQ FT ALLOWABLE DECK (15% OF MAX FLOOR AREA): - - SQ FT FRONT SETBACK: 25'-0" SIDE SETBACKS: 10'-0" REAR SETBACK: 10'-0" MAXIMUM HEIGHT (PRINCIPAL STRUCTURE) (FT.): 25'-0" 191 EASTWOOD ROAD ASPEN, CO 81611 125 LOT 24 EA S T W O O D DRIV E LOT 12 XXXE BA S I S O F B E A R I N G S S 6 1 ° 1 3 ' 0 0 " E 2 1 0 . 2 5 'N41°56'30"E 59.82'N 5 6 ° 5 8 ' 0 0 " W 1 4 0 . 9 1 'S05°59'47"W 59.91'(P=S07°24'15"W 59.91')N76°55 ' 5 7 " W 14.52'(P=N7 6 ° 1 6 ' 0 0 " W ) L= 93.54 (P=94.77') R= 271.96' CB= N67°07'14"W (P=N66°57'00"W) CH= 93.07' (P=94.29') FOUND NO.5 REBAR FOUND NO.5 REBAR (BEARS S76°55'57"E 1.66') SET NO.5 REBAR & 1-1/4" ORANGE PLASTIC CAP LS 38215 SITE BENCHMARK SET NO.5 REBAR & 1-1/4" BLUE PLASTIC CAP LS 38215 (14' WITNESS CORNER) ELEVATION: 8058.70' FOUND NO.5 REBAR & 1-1/4" RED PLASTIC CAP (ILLEGIBLE) 14,858± SQ.FT. 0.341 AC. (AS-SURVEYED) 807 0 806 5 8 0 6 0 8055806080658 0 6 0 8 0 6 0 80708075 8 0 8 0 8 0 8 0 8 0 7 58063 LOT 13 LOT 11 LOT 23 LOT 22 LOT 25 80 5 5 191 EASTWOOD DRIVE, ASPEN 2-STORY STUCCO HOME 83. 2 '15.5'11. 4 ' 9.2' 18. 1 ' 30. 2 ' 14. 4 '15.0'16.0'4.8'4.5'15.9'FFE: 8 0 6 7 . 0 7 ' GRAVE L W A L K FFE: 8 0 7 6 . 3 8 ' FFE: 8 0 8 0 . 0 1 ' DE C KSTEPS SPA PATIOBO U L D E R WA L L ( T Y P ) CONCRETE W A L L RR- T I E W A L L BO U L D E R S WI R E F E N C E 10' SETBACK 5' SETBACK 5' SETBACK9.2'31.3'15.3'6' UTILITY & DRAINAGE EASEMENT BK4/PG4 (TYPICAL) (P A V E D R O A D W A Y 30 ' R I G H T O F W A Y ) EASPHALY DRIVEWAY 30' SETBACK6' UTILITY & DRAINAGE EASEMENT BK4/PG4 (TYPICAL) 5' CONSTRUCTION & MAINTENANCE OF UTILITY & DRAINAGE EASEMENT BK4/PG4 (TYPICAL) ELECTRICAL METERE SURVEYOR 'S CERTIFICATION SURVEY NOTES: 5.THIS IMPROVEMENT SURVEY PLAT DOES NOT CONSTITUTE A TITLE SEARCH BY TRUE NORTH COLORADO, LLC FOR ALL INFORMATION REGARDING EASEMENT, RIGHTS-OF-WAY AND/OR TITLE OF RECORD, TRUE NORTH COLORADO, LLC. RELIED UPON TITLE COMMITMENT NO. 7000657-C2 ISSUED BY TITLE COMPANY OF THE ROCKIES, EFFECTIVE DATE: MARCH 5, 2021. 6.ELEVATIONS SHOWN HEREON ARE BASED ON NORTH AMERICAN VERTICAL DATUM OF 1988 (NAVD 88) REFERENCED FROM NATIONAL GEODETIC SURVEY (NGS) BENCHMARK STATION Q-159 HAVING AN ELEVATION OF 7911.98. 7.CONTOUR INTERVAL EQUALS 1 FOOT. 8.2+ FEET OF SNOW AT DATE OF FIELD SURVEY, SOME IMPROVEMENTS MAY NOT HAVE BEEN VISIBLE. 9.THE HISTORIC TOPOGRAPHIC DATA SHOWN HEREON WAS PREPARED BY UTILIZING A 1958 TOPOGRAPHIC MAP OF THE CITY OF ASPEN PREPARED BY FALCON AIR MAPS AND SOME ASSUMPTIONS BASED ON THE UNDISTURBED EXISTING SLOPES AND GRADES OUTSIDE OF THE DEVELOPED AREAS OF THE PROPERTY AND IS THE BEST AVAILABLE EVIDENCE OF THE EXISTING GRADES PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION OF ANY IMPROVEMENTS. LOT 24 - EASTWOOD SUBDIVISION SECTION 18, TOWNSHIP 10 SOUTH, RANGE 84 WEST OF THE 6TH PM CITY OF ASPEN - COUNTY OF PITKIN - STATE OF COLORADO IMPROVEMENT & TOPOGRAPHIC SURVEY YEARS FROM THE DATE OF CERTIFICATION SHOWN HEREON. AFTER YOU FIRST DISCOVER SUCH DEFECT. IN NO EVENT MAY ANY ACTION ACTION BASED UPON ANY DEFECT IN THIS SURVEY WITHIN THREE YEARS BASED UPON ANY DEFECT IN THIS SURVEY BE COMMENCED MORE THAN TEN NOTICE: ACCORDING TO COLORADO LAW YOU MUST COMMENCE ANY LEGAL PROJECT NO: 2021-158 DATE: March 08, 2021 DRAWN LDV SURVEYED GBL SHEET 1 OF 1 TRUENORTH A LAND SURVEYING AND MAPPING COMPANY 15'7.5'30' SCALE: 1" = 15' N 0 PROPERTY ZONING SLOPES TRUE NORTH COLORADO LLC. A LAND SURVEYING AND MAPPING COMPANY P.O. BOX 614 - 386 MAIN STREET UNIT 3 NEW CASTLE, COLORADO 81647 (970) 984-0474 www.truenorthcolorado.com ELECTRICAL TRANSFORMER TELEPHONE PEDESTAL ELECTRIC PEDESTAL LEGEND MAILBOX P = PLATTED MEASUREMENT PROPERTY DESCRIPTION: 126 8 0 5 0 8 0 5 5 8 0 6 0 8 0 6 5 8 0 7 0 8 0 7 5 8 0 8 0 8 0 8 5 8 0 9 0 LOT 24 EA S T W O O D DRIV E LOT 12 XXXE BA S I S O F B E A R I N G S S 6 1 ° 1 3 ' 0 0 " E 2 1 0 . 2 5 'N41°56'30"E 59.82'N5 6 ° 5 8 ' 0 0 " W 1 4 0 . 9 1 'S05°59'47"W 59.91'(P=S07°24'15"W 59.91')N76°5 5 ' 5 7 " W 14.52'(P=N7 6 ° 1 6 ' 0 0 " W ) L= 93.54 (P=94.77') R= 271.96' CB= N67°07'14"W (P=N66°57'00"W) CH= 93.07' (P=94.29') FOUND NO.5 REBAR FOUND NO.5 REBAR (BEARS S76°55'57"E 1.66') SET NO.5 REBAR & 1-1/4" ORANGE PLASTIC CAP LS 38215 SITE BENCHMARK SET NO.5 REBAR & 1-1/4" BLUE PLASTIC CAP LS 38215 (14' WITNESS CORNER) ELEVATION: 8058.70' FOUND NO.5 REBAR & 1-1/4" RED PLASTIC CAP (ILLEGIBLE) 14,858± SQ.FT. 0.341 AC. (AS-SURVEYED) LOT 13 LOT 11 LOT 23 LOT 22 LOT 25 191 EASTWOOD DRIVE, ASPEN 2-STORY STUCCO HOME 83. 2 '15.5'11. 4 ' 9.2' 18. 1 ' 30. 2 ' 14. 4 '15.0'16.0'4.8'4.5'15.9'FFE: 8 0 6 7 . 0 7 ' GRAVE L W A L K FFE: 8 0 7 6 . 3 8 ' FFE: 8 0 8 0 . 0 1 ' DE C KSTEPS SPA PATIOBO U L D E R WA L L ( T Y P ) CONCRETE W A L L RR- T I E W A L L BO U L D E R S WI R E F E N C E 10' SETBACK 5' SETBACK 5' SETBACK9.2'31.3'15.3'6' UTILITY & DRAINAGE EASEMENT BK4/PG4 (TYPICAL) (P A V E D R O A D W A Y 30 ' R I G H T O F W A Y ) EASPHALY DRIVEWAY 30' SETBACK6' UTILITY & DRAINAGE EASEMENT BK4/PG4 (TYPICAL) 5' CONSTRUCTION & MAINTENANCE OF UTILITY & DRAINAGE EASEMENT BK4/PG4 (TYPICAL) HISTORIC CONTOURS (5' INTERVAL) (SEE NOTE #8) ELECTRICAL METERE SURVEYOR'S CERTIFICATION SURVEY NOTES: 5.THIS IMPROVEMENT SURVEY PLAT DOES NOT CONSTITUTE A TITLE SEARCH BY TRUE NORTH COLORADO, LLC FOR ALL INFORMATION REGARDING EASEMENT, RIGHTS-OF-WAY AND/OR TITLE OF RECORD, TRUE NORTH COLORADO, LLC. RELIED UPON TITLE COMMITMENT NO. 7000657-C2 ISSUED BY TITLE COMPANY OF THE ROCKIES, EFFECTIVE DATE: MARCH 5, 2021. 6.CONTOUR INTERVAL EQUALS 1 FOOT. 7.2+ FEET OF SNOW AT DATE OF FIELD SURVEY, SOME IMPROVEMENTS MAY NOT HAVE BEEN VISIBLE. 8.THE HISTORIC TOPOGRAPHIC DATA SHOWN HEREON WAS PREPARED BY UTILIZING A 1958 TOPOGRAPHIC MAP OF THE CITY OF ASPEN PREPARED BY FALCON AIR MAPS AND SOME ASSUMPTIONS BASED ON THE UNDISTURBED EXISTING SLOPES AND GRADES OUTSIDE OF THE DEVELOPED AREAS OF THE PROPERTY AND IS THE BEST AVAILABLE EVIDENCE OF THE EXISTING GRADES PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION OF ANY IMPROVEMENTS. LOT 24 - EASTWOOD SUBDIVISION SECTION 18, TOWNSHIP 10 SOUTH, RANGE 84 WEST OF THE 6TH PM CITY OF ASPEN - COUNTY OF PITKIN - STATE OF COLORADO HISTORIC TOPOGRAPHIC SURVEY YEARS FROM THE DATE OF CERTIFICATION SHOWN HEREON. AFTER YOU FIRST DISCOVER SUCH DEFECT. IN NO EVENT MAY ANY ACTION ACTION BASED UPON ANY DEFECT IN THIS SURVEY WITHIN THREE YEARS BASED UPON ANY DEFECT IN THIS SURVEY BE COMMENCED MORE THAN TEN NOTICE: ACCORDING TO COLORADO LAW YOU MUST COMMENCE ANY LEGAL PROJECT NO: 2021-158 DATE: March 08, 2021 DRAWN LDV SURVEYED GBL SHEET 1 OF 1 TRUENORTH A LAND SURVEYING AND MAPPING COMPANY 15'7.5'30' SCALE: 1" = 15' N 0 PROPERTY ZONING TRUE NORTH COLORADO LLC. A LAND SURVEYING AND MAPPING COMPANY P.O. BOX 614 - 386 MAIN STREET UNIT 3 NEW CASTLE, COLORADO 81647 (970) 984-0474 www.truenorthcolorado.com ELECTRICAL TRANSFORMER TELEPHONE PEDESTAL ELECTRIC PEDESTAL LEGEND MAILBOX P = PLATTED MEASUREMENT PROPERTY DESCRIPTION: 127 Scale: AS NOTED ISSUE SCHEMATIC DESIGN PROPOSAL SET LAND USE SET191 EASTWOOD191 EASTWOOD ROADASPEN, CO 816111" ACTUAL IF THE ABOVE DIMENSION DOES NOT MEASURE ONE INCH (1") EXACTLY, THIS DRAWING WILL HAVE BEEN ENLARGED OR REDUCED, AFFECTING ALL LABELED SCALES. ALL DESIGNS, IDEAS ARRANGEMENTS AND PLANS INDICATED BY THESE DRAWINGS AND SPECIFICATIONS ARE THE PROPERTY AND COPYRIGHT OF KIM RAYMOND ARCHITECTS, INC. AND SHALL NEITHER BE USED ON ANY OTHER WORK NOR BE USED BY ANY OTHER PERSON FOR ANY USE WHATSOEVER WITHOUT WRITTEN PERMISSION. WRITTEN DIMENSIONS SHALL TAKE P R E C E D E N C E O V E R S C A L E D DIMENSIONS AND SHALL BE VERIFIED AT T H E S I T E . A N Y D I M E N S I O N A L DISCREPANCY SHALL BE BROUGHT TO THE ATTENTION OF THE ARCHITECT PRIOR TO COMMENCEMENT OF WORK. A.1.01 3/14/22 EXISTING SITE PLAN DATE 7/15/21 www.kimraymondarchitects.com 970-925-22527/30/21 11/12/21 STAIRS 808 0 FLAT ROOFFLAT ROOFFLAT ROOFFLAT ROOF DECK BELOW PROPERTY LINE PROPERTY LINE SETBACK LINE SETBACK LINE SETBACK LINE PROPERTY L INEPROPERTY LINESCALE: 1/8" = 1'-0"1 EXISTING SITE PLAN N SCALE: 1/8" = 1'-0" 128 Scale: AS NOTED ISSUE SCHEMATIC DESIGN PROPOSAL SET LAND USE SET191 EASTWOOD191 EASTWOOD ROADASPEN, CO 816111" ACTUAL IF THE ABOVE DIMENSION DOES NOT MEASURE ONE INCH (1") EXACTLY, THIS DRAWING WILL HAVE BEEN ENLARGED OR REDUCED, AFFECTING ALL LABELED SCALES. ALL DESIGNS, IDEAS ARRANGEMENTS AND PLANS INDICATED BY THESE DRAWINGS AND SPECIFICATIONS ARE THE PROPERTY AND COPYRIGHT OF KIM RAYMOND ARCHITECTS, INC. AND SHALL NEITHER BE USED ON ANY OTHER WORK NOR BE USED BY ANY OTHER PERSON FOR ANY USE WHATSOEVER WITHOUT WRITTEN PERMISSION. WRITTEN DIMENSIONS SHALL TAKE P R E C E D E N C E O V E R S C A L E D DIMENSIONS AND SHALL BE VERIFIED AT T H E S I T E . A N Y D I M E N S I O N A L DISCREPANCY SHALL BE BROUGHT TO THE ATTENTION OF THE ARCHITECT PRIOR TO COMMENCEMENT OF WORK. A.1.02 3/14/22 PROPOSED SITE PLAN DATE 7/15/21 www.kimraymondarchitects.com 970-925-22527/30/21 11/12/21 FLAT ROOFFLAT ROOFFLAT ROOF DECK BELOW SLOPED ROOF PROPERTY LINE PROPERTY LINE SETBACK LINE SETBACK LINE SETBACK LINE PROPERTY L INEPROPERTY LINEPROPOSED SET B A C K L I N E PROPOSED SETBACK LINE PROPOSED SETBACK LINE PROPOSED SETBACK LINE SCALE: 1/8" = 1'-0"1 PROPOSED SITE PLAN N SCALE: 1/8" = 1'-0" 129 Scale: AS NOTED ISSUE SCHEMATIC DESIGN PROPOSAL SET LAND USE SET 1" ACTUAL IF THE ABOVE DIMENSION DOES NOT MEASURE ONE INCH (1") EXACTLY, THIS DRAWING WILL HAVE BEEN ENLARGED OR REDUCED, AFFECTING ALL LABELED SCALES. ALL DESIGNS, IDEAS ARRANGEMENTS AND PLANS INDICATED BY THESE DRAWINGS AND SPECIFICATIONS ARE THE PROPERTY AND COPYRIGHT OF KIM RAYMOND ARCHITECTS, INC. AND SHALL NEITHER BE USED ON ANY OTHER WORK NOR BE USED BY ANY OTHER PERSON FOR ANY USE WHATSOEVER WITHOUT WRITTEN PERMISSION. WRITTEN DIMENSIONS SHALL TAKE P R E C E D E N C E O V E R S C A L E D DIMENSIONS AND SHALL BE VERIFIED AT T H E S I T E . A N Y D I M E N S I O N A L DISCREPANCY SHALL BE BROUGHT TO THE ATTENTION OF THE ARCHITECT PRIOR TO COMMENCEMENT OF WORK. A.1.03 3/14/22 EXISTING FAR CALCULATIONS DATE www.kimraymondarchitects.com 970-925-2252191 EASTWOOD191 EASTWOOD ROADASPEN, CO 816117/15/21 7/30/21 11/12/21 EXISTING FLOOR AREA CALCULATIONS CITY OF ASPEN ZONING SUBMISSION SUBGRADE LEVEL WALL LABEL TOTAL WALL AREA (SQ. FT.) EXPOSED WALL AREA (SQ. FT.) 1 337 84 2 236 69 3 305 289 4 160 160 5 121 121 6 118 118 OVERALL TOTAL WALL AREA (SQ. FT.)1277 EXPOSED WALL AREA (SQ. FT.)841 % OF EXPOSED WALL (EXPOSED/TOTAL)65.86% SUBGRADE GROSS FLOOR AREA (SQ. FT.)605 SUBGRADE COUNTABLE FLOOR AREA (SQ. FT.)398.44 LOWER LEVEL FLOOR AREA (SQ. FT.) 0 MAIN LEVEL FLOOR AREA (SQ. FT.)399 UPPER LEVEL FLOOR AREA (SQ. FT.)1673 GARAGE FLOOR AREA 0 DECK FLOOR AREA (15% OF 3172 = 475) 604 SQ. FT. 129 EXEMPT TOTAL EXISTING FLOOR AREA (SQ. FT.)2201 (3172 ALLOWED) TOTAL EXISTING FLOOR AREA CALCULATIONS EXISTING SUBGRADE LEVEL EXPOSED WALL CALCULATIONS 305 sq ft 84 sq ft 236 sq ft 289 sq ft 160 sq ft 121 sq ft 118 sq ft 337 sq ft 1 2 3 4 5 6 69 sq ft1,105 sq ft GROSS 22 sq ftD01 D01D07 D07 D07D075'-5 3/4"1'-9"237 sq ft (-500 EXEMPT) 0 sq ft 65.86 EXPOSED WALL 1,105 GROSS SQ FT - 500 GARAGE =605 SQ FT * .6586 = 399 SQ FT 133 sq ft W50D02W50 W50 W50 W50 W50 W50D39W50W50 W50 W50W50W50W50W50W50 D07 D07D07 D07D02 D07W50W48 D02D02D02D02D07 1'-6"2'-4"1,673 sq ft 449 sq ft SCALE: 3/16" = 1'-0"2 FAR ELEVATIONS SCALE: 3/16" = 1'-0"1 EXISTING MAIN LEVEL FAR SCALE: 3/16" = 1'-0"3 EXISTING UPPER LEVEL FAR 130 Scale: AS NOTED ISSUE SCHEMATIC DESIGN PROPOSAL SET LAND USE SET 1" ACTUAL IF THE ABOVE DIMENSION DOES NOT MEASURE ONE INCH (1") EXACTLY, THIS DRAWING WILL HAVE BEEN ENLARGED OR REDUCED, AFFECTING ALL LABELED SCALES. ALL DESIGNS, IDEAS ARRANGEMENTS AND PLANS INDICATED BY THESE DRAWINGS AND SPECIFICATIONS ARE THE PROPERTY AND COPYRIGHT OF KIM RAYMOND ARCHITECTS, INC. AND SHALL NEITHER BE USED ON ANY OTHER WORK NOR BE USED BY ANY OTHER PERSON FOR ANY USE WHATSOEVER WITHOUT WRITTEN PERMISSION. WRITTEN DIMENSIONS SHALL TAKE P R E C E D E N C E O V E R S C A L E D DIMENSIONS AND SHALL BE VERIFIED AT T H E S I T E . A N Y D I M E N S I O N A L DISCREPANCY SHALL BE BROUGHT TO THE ATTENTION OF THE ARCHITECT PRIOR TO COMMENCEMENT OF WORK. A.1.04 3/14/22 PROPOSED FAR CALCULATIONS DATE www.kimraymondarchitects.com 970-925-2252191 EASTWOOD191 EASTWOOD ROADASPEN, CO 816117/15/21 7/30/21 11/12/21D16W07W06W05W04D03D02 W02 W01 W03 D01 D045'-5 3/4"1'-9"1,753 sq ft GROSS 649 sq ft (500 sq ft EXEMPT) (149 sq ft) 225 sq ft > 5'-6" (EXEMPT) UP UP 57.23 EXPOSED WALL 1,753 GROSS SQ FT - 500 GARAGE =1,253 SQ FT * .5817 = 729 SQ FT D20W59 W57 W55 W50W53W51W52W54W56W58 W45W47W49 W44W46W48 W23 W22 W21 W20 W25W24W27 W26 W31W37W36W34W38W33W35 W30W32W40W43W39W42W41 W29W28D22W65W61W60W64W62W63 D212,294 sq ft 411 sq ft62 sq ftDN UP 285 sq ft 85 sq ft 268 sq ft 272 sq ft 28 sq ft 16 sq ft 338 sq ft 116 sq ft 22 sq ft 336 sq ft143 sq ft 432 sq ft 283 sq ft 142 sq ft 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 SCALE: 3/16" = 1'-0"1 PROPOSED MAIN LEVEL FAR SCALE: 3/16" = 1'-0"3 PROPOSED UPPER LEVEL FAR SCALE: 3/16" = 1'-0"2 FAR ELEVATIONS 131 Scale: AS NOTED ISSUE SCHEMATIC DESIGN PROPOSAL SET LAND USE SET191 EASTWOOD191 EASTWOOD ROADASPEN, CO 816111" ACTUAL IF THE ABOVE DIMENSION DOES NOT MEASURE ONE INCH (1") EXACTLY, THIS DRAWING WILL HAVE BEEN ENLARGED OR REDUCED, AFFECTING ALL LABELED SCALES. ALL DESIGNS, IDEAS ARRANGEMENTS AND PLANS INDICATED BY THESE DRAWINGS AND SPECIFICATIONS ARE THE PROPERTY AND COPYRIGHT OF KIM RAYMOND ARCHITECTS, INC. AND SHALL NEITHER BE USED ON ANY OTHER WORK NOR BE USED BY ANY OTHER PERSON FOR ANY USE WHATSOEVER WITHOUT WRITTEN PERMISSION. WRITTEN DIMENSIONS SHALL TAKE P R E C E D E N C E O V E R S C A L E D DIMENSIONS AND SHALL BE VERIFIED AT T H E S I T E . A N Y D I M E N S I O N A L DISCREPANCY SHALL BE BROUGHT TO THE ATTENTION OF THE ARCHITECT PRIOR TO COMMENCEMENT OF WORK. A.2.01 3/14/22 EXISTING MAIN LEVEL PLAN DATE 7/15/21 www.kimraymondarchitects.com 970-925-22527/30/21 11/12/21D01D01D07 D07 D07D07C C A A 1 1 5 5 4 4 3 3 E E 2 2 B36'-11 1/2"10'-2 1/4"4'-8"14'-10 1/2"7'-2 3/4"82'-5 5/8" 14'-6 3/8"29'-6 3/4"20'-6 1/2"17'-10" 82'-5 5/8" 14'-6 3/8"29'-6 3/4"20'-6 1/2"17'-10"36'-11 1/2"14'-10 1/4"14'-10 1/2"7'-2 3/4"5'-5 3/4"1'-9"1 A.3.012A.3.011 A.3.02 2A.3.01GARAGE BEDROOM 2 BEDROOM 1 BATH 1 LAUNDRY ENTRY STAIRWELL BATH 2 D D 1 A 5.3 1 A 5.3 1 A 5.3 1 A 5.3 1 A 5.3 1 A 5.3 1 A 5.3 1 A 5.3 1 A 5.3 1 A 5.3 1 A 5.3 1 A 5.3 PROPERTY LINE SETBACK LINE SETBACK LINE SETBACK LINE N SCALE: 1/4" = 1'-0" 132 Scale: AS NOTED ISSUE SCHEMATIC DESIGN PROPOSAL SET LAND USE SET191 EASTWOOD191 EASTWOOD ROADASPEN, CO 816111" ACTUAL IF THE ABOVE DIMENSION DOES NOT MEASURE ONE INCH (1") EXACTLY, THIS DRAWING WILL HAVE BEEN ENLARGED OR REDUCED, AFFECTING ALL LABELED SCALES. ALL DESIGNS, IDEAS ARRANGEMENTS AND PLANS INDICATED BY THESE DRAWINGS AND SPECIFICATIONS ARE THE PROPERTY AND COPYRIGHT OF KIM RAYMOND ARCHITECTS, INC. AND SHALL NEITHER BE USED ON ANY OTHER WORK NOR BE USED BY ANY OTHER PERSON FOR ANY USE WHATSOEVER WITHOUT WRITTEN PERMISSION. WRITTEN DIMENSIONS SHALL TAKE P R E C E D E N C E O V E R S C A L E D DIMENSIONS AND SHALL BE VERIFIED AT T H E S I T E . A N Y D I M E N S I O N A L DISCREPANCY SHALL BE BROUGHT TO THE ATTENTION OF THE ARCHITECT PRIOR TO COMMENCEMENT OF WORK. A.2.02 3/14/22 EXISTING UPPER LEVEL PLAN DATE 7/15/21 www.kimraymondarchitects.com 970-925-22527/30/21 11/12/21DWTRASHW50D02W50W50W50W50W50 W50D39W50W50 W50 W50W50W50W50W50W50 D07 D07D07 D07D02 D07W50W48 D02D02D02D02D07 C C A A 1 1 5 5 4 4 3 3 E E 2 2 B 1 A.3.012A.3.011 A.3.02 2A.3.0182'-5 1/2" 14'-6 1/2"29'-6 3/4"20'-6 1/2"17'-10"36'-11 1/2"10'-2 1/4"4'-8"14'-10 1/2"7'-2 3/4"82'-5 1/2" 14'-6 1/2"29'-6 3/4"20'-6 1/2"17'-10"36'-11 1/2"10'-2 1/4"4'-8"14'-10 1/2"7'-2 3/4"10'-0"5 3/4"8'-7 1/2"1'-6"2'-4"MASTER BEDROOM MASTER CLOSET MASTER CLOSET MASTER BATH BATH 3 CLOSETPANTRY KITCHEN FAMILY ROOM LIVING ROOM DECK D D 1 A 5.3 1 A 5.3 1 A 5.3 1 A 5.3 1 A 5.3 1 A 5.3 1 A 5.3 1 A 5.3 1 A 5.3 1 A 5.3 1 A 5.3 1 A 5.3 PROPERTY LINE PROPERTY LIN E EXISTING SETBACK LINE SETBACK LINE EXISTING SETB A C K L I N E N SCALE: 1/4" = 1'-0" 133 Scale: AS NOTED ISSUE SCHEMATIC DESIGN PROPOSAL SET LAND USE SET191 EASTWOOD191 EASTWOOD ROADASPEN, CO 816111" ACTUAL IF THE ABOVE DIMENSION DOES NOT MEASURE ONE INCH (1") EXACTLY, THIS DRAWING WILL HAVE BEEN ENLARGED OR REDUCED, AFFECTING ALL LABELED SCALES. ALL DESIGNS, IDEAS ARRANGEMENTS AND PLANS INDICATED BY THESE DRAWINGS AND SPECIFICATIONS ARE THE PROPERTY AND COPYRIGHT OF KIM RAYMOND ARCHITECTS, INC. AND SHALL NEITHER BE USED ON ANY OTHER WORK NOR BE USED BY ANY OTHER PERSON FOR ANY USE WHATSOEVER WITHOUT WRITTEN PERMISSION. WRITTEN DIMENSIONS SHALL TAKE P R E C E D E N C E O V E R S C A L E D DIMENSIONS AND SHALL BE VERIFIED AT T H E S I T E . A N Y D I M E N S I O N A L DISCREPANCY SHALL BE BROUGHT TO THE ATTENTION OF THE ARCHITECT PRIOR TO COMMENCEMENT OF WORK. A.2.03 3/14/22 EXISTING ROOF PLAN DATE 7/15/21 www.kimraymondarchitects.com 970-925-22527/30/21 11/12/21 C C A A 1 1 5 5 4 4 3 3 E E 2 2 B 1 A.3.012A.3.011 A.3.02 2A.3.01FLAT ROOFFLAT ROOFFLAT ROOFFLAT ROOF DECK BELOW STAIRS D D 1 A 5.3 1 A 5.3 1 A 5.3 1 A 5.3 1 A 5.3 1 A 5.3 1 A 5.3 1 A 5.3 1 A 5.3 1 A 5.3 1 A 5.3 1 A 5.3 PROPERTY LINE PROPERTY LIN E SETBACK LINE SETBACK LINE SETBACK LINE N SCALE: 1/4" = 1'-0" 134 Scale: AS NOTED ISSUE SCHEMATIC DESIGN PROPOSAL SET LAND USE SET191 EASTWOOD191 EASTWOOD ROADASPEN, CO 816111" ACTUAL IF THE ABOVE DIMENSION DOES NOT MEASURE ONE INCH (1") EXACTLY, THIS DRAWING WILL HAVE BEEN ENLARGED OR REDUCED, AFFECTING ALL LABELED SCALES. ALL DESIGNS, IDEAS ARRANGEMENTS AND PLANS INDICATED BY THESE DRAWINGS AND SPECIFICATIONS ARE THE PROPERTY AND COPYRIGHT OF KIM RAYMOND ARCHITECTS, INC. AND SHALL NEITHER BE USED ON ANY OTHER WORK NOR BE USED BY ANY OTHER PERSON FOR ANY USE WHATSOEVER WITHOUT WRITTEN PERMISSION. WRITTEN DIMENSIONS SHALL TAKE P R E C E D E N C E O V E R S C A L E D DIMENSIONS AND SHALL BE VERIFIED AT T H E S I T E . A N Y D I M E N S I O N A L DISCREPANCY SHALL BE BROUGHT TO THE ATTENTION OF THE ARCHITECT PRIOR TO COMMENCEMENT OF WORK. A.2.04 3/14/22 PROPOSED MAIN LEVEL PLAN DATE 7/15/21 www.kimraymondarchitects.com 970-925-22527/30/21 11/12/21 XL STACKED W/D D16W07W06W05W04D03 D02 W02 W01 W03 D01 D07 D08 D13D15 D14D11D12D10D09D08 D04 C C A A 5 5 4 4 3 3 6 6 E E 1 1 2 2 A1 B36'-11 1/2"4'-6"5'-8 1/4"4'-8"14'-10 1/2"7'-2 3/4"82'-5 5/8" 14'-6 3/8"29'-6 3/4"20'-6 1/2"17'-10" 82'-5 5/8" 14'-6 3/8"29'-6 3/4"20'-6 1/2"17'-10"36'-11 1/2"14'-10 1/4"14'-10 1/2"7'-2 3/4"28'-0" 28'-0" 28'-0" 28'-0"5'-5 3/4"1'-9"1 A.3.012A.3.011 A.3.02 2A.3.01BEDROOM 2 BATH 1 BATH 2 MECHANICAL ROOM LAUNDRY ROOM ENTRY MUDROOM GARAGE PLANTER ENTRY PATIO SHOWER SHOWER WC STAIRWELL BEDROOM 1 STAIRS LOCKOFF STORAGE BIKES BENCHCUBBIES CLOSET CLOSET CLOSET PLANTER D D 1 A 5.3 1 A 5.3 1 A 5.3 1 A 5.3 1 A 5.3 1 A 5.3 1 A 5.3 1 A 5.3 1 A 5.3 1 A 5.3 1 A 5.3 1 A 5.3 UP UP PROPERTY LINE SETBACK LINE SETBACK LINE SETBACK LINE PROPOSED SE T B A C K L I N E PROPOSED SETBACK LINE PROPOSED SETBACK LINE PROPOSED SETBACK LINE N SCALE: 1/4" = 1'-0" 135 Scale: AS NOTED ISSUE SCHEMATIC DESIGN PROPOSAL SET LAND USE SET191 EASTWOOD191 EASTWOOD ROADASPEN, CO 816111" ACTUAL IF THE ABOVE DIMENSION DOES NOT MEASURE ONE INCH (1") EXACTLY, THIS DRAWING WILL HAVE BEEN ENLARGED OR REDUCED, AFFECTING ALL LABELED SCALES. ALL DESIGNS, IDEAS ARRANGEMENTS AND PLANS INDICATED BY THESE DRAWINGS AND SPECIFICATIONS ARE THE PROPERTY AND COPYRIGHT OF KIM RAYMOND ARCHITECTS, INC. AND SHALL NEITHER BE USED ON ANY OTHER WORK NOR BE USED BY ANY OTHER PERSON FOR ANY USE WHATSOEVER WITHOUT WRITTEN PERMISSION. WRITTEN DIMENSIONS SHALL TAKE P R E C E D E N C E O V E R S C A L E D DIMENSIONS AND SHALL BE VERIFIED AT T H E S I T E . A N Y D I M E N S I O N A L DISCREPANCY SHALL BE BROUGHT TO THE ATTENTION OF THE ARCHITECT PRIOR TO COMMENCEMENT OF WORK. A.2.05 3/14/22 PROPOSED UPPER LEVEL PLAN DATE 7/15/21 www.kimraymondarchitects.com 970-925-22527/30/21 11/12/21 TRASH W/D REF.D20W59 W57 W55 W50W53W51W52W54W56W58 W45W47W49 W44W46W48D31 W23 W22 W21 W20 W25W24W27 W26 W31W37W36W34W38W33W35 W30W32W40W43W39W42W41 W29W28D22D23 D24D25W65W61W60W64W62W63 D30D21D29 D27 D26C C A A 5 5 4 4 3 3 6 6 E E 1 1 2 2 A1 B 1 A.3.012A.3.011 A.3.02 2A.3.014'-0"12'-5 1/2"3'-5 1/2" 6 3/4" 11'-3 3/4" 6 3/4" 82'-5 1/2" 14'-6 1/2"29'-6 3/4"20'-6 1/2"17'-10"36'-11 1/2"10'-2 1/4"4'-8"14'-10 1/2"7'-2 3/4"82'-5 1/2" 14'-6 1/2"29'-6 3/4"20'-6 1/2"17'-10"36'-11 1/2"10'-2 1/4"4'-8"14'-10 1/2"7'-2 3/4"4'-6"2'-0 3/4"7'-0"10'-0"7 1/2"8'-7 1/2"1'-6"2'-4"GYM MASTER CLOSET (HERS) MASTER BATHROOM MASTER BEDROOM LIVING ROOM MASTER CLOSET (HIS) WC STEAM POWDER DECK KITCHEN GUEST MASTER CLOSET GUEST MASTER BATH GUEST MASTER BEDROOM PANTRY AND STORAGE DINING BUFFET W SHELVES ABOVE W/ LED STRIPS CHASE DW WINE REFRIG D D 1 A 5.3 1 A 5.3 1 A 5.3 1 A 5.3 1 A 5.3 1 A 5.3 1 A 5.3 1 A 5.3 1 A 5.3 1 A 5.3 1 A 5.3 1 A 5.3 FRZ.DOUBLE OVENS DN UP BROOM CLOSET PROPERTY LINE PROPERTY LIN E EXISTING SETBACK LINE SETBACK LINE EXISTING SETB A C K L I N E PROPOSED SETBACK LINE PROPOSED SETBACK LINE PROPOSED SETBACK LINE PROPOSED SETBACK LINE N SCALE: 1/4" = 1'-0" 136 Scale: AS NOTED ISSUE SCHEMATIC DESIGN PROPOSAL SET LAND USE SET191 EASTWOOD191 EASTWOOD ROADASPEN, CO 816111" ACTUAL IF THE ABOVE DIMENSION DOES NOT MEASURE ONE INCH (1") EXACTLY, THIS DRAWING WILL HAVE BEEN ENLARGED OR REDUCED, AFFECTING ALL LABELED SCALES. ALL DESIGNS, IDEAS ARRANGEMENTS AND PLANS INDICATED BY THESE DRAWINGS AND SPECIFICATIONS ARE THE PROPERTY AND COPYRIGHT OF KIM RAYMOND ARCHITECTS, INC. AND SHALL NEITHER BE USED ON ANY OTHER WORK NOR BE USED BY ANY OTHER PERSON FOR ANY USE WHATSOEVER WITHOUT WRITTEN PERMISSION. WRITTEN DIMENSIONS SHALL TAKE P R E C E D E N C E O V E R S C A L E D DIMENSIONS AND SHALL BE VERIFIED AT T H E S I T E . A N Y D I M E N S I O N A L DISCREPANCY SHALL BE BROUGHT TO THE ATTENTION OF THE ARCHITECT PRIOR TO COMMENCEMENT OF WORK. A.2.06 3/14/22 PROPOSED ROOF PLAN DATE 7/15/21 www.kimraymondarchitects.com 970-925-22527/30/21 11/12/21 C C A A 5 5 4 4 3 3 6 6 E E 1 1 2 2 A1 B 1 A.3.012A.3.011 A.3.02 2A.3.01FLAT ROOFFLAT ROOFFLAT ROOF DECK BELOW SLOPED ROOF SLOPE 1" : 1'-0" D D 1 A 5.3 1 A 5.3 1 A 5.3 1 A 5.3 1 A 5.3 1 A 5.3 1 A 5.3 1 A 5.3 1 A 5.3 1 A 5.3 1 A 5.3 1 A 5.3 PROPERTY LINE PROPERTY LIN E SETBACK LINE SETBACK LINE SETBACK LINE PROPOSED SETBACK LINE PROPOSED SETBACK LINE PROPOSED SETBACK LINE N SCALE: 1/4" = 1'-0" 137 Scale: AS NOTED ISSUE SCHEMATIC DESIGN PROPOSAL SET LAND USE SET 1" ACTUAL IF THE ABOVE DIMENSION DOES NOT MEASURE ONE INCH (1") EXACTLY, THIS DRAWING WILL HAVE BEEN ENLARGED OR REDUCED, AFFECTING ALL LABELED SCALES. ALL DESIGNS, IDEAS ARRANGEMENTS AND PLANS INDICATED BY THESE DRAWINGS AND SPECIFICATIONS ARE THE PROPERTY AND COPYRIGHT OF KIM RAYMOND ARCHITECTS, INC. AND SHALL NEITHER BE USED ON ANY OTHER WORK NOR BE USED BY ANY OTHER PERSON FOR ANY USE WHATSOEVER WITHOUT WRITTEN PERMISSION. WRITTEN DIMENSIONS SHALL TAKE P R E C E D E N C E O V E R S C A L E D DIMENSIONS AND SHALL BE VERIFIED AT T H E S I T E . A N Y D I M E N S I O N A L DISCREPANCY SHALL BE BROUGHT TO THE ATTENTION OF THE ARCHITECT PRIOR TO COMMENCEMENT OF WORK. A.3.01 3/14/22 EXISTING ELEVATIONS: SOUTH & WEST DATE www.kimraymondarchitects.com 970-925-2252191 EASTWOOD191 EASTWOOD ROADASPEN, CO 816117/15/21 7/30/21 11/12/21 5 5 4 4 3 3 2 2 1 1 T.O. EXST. GARAGE 100'-3 3/4" EXST. U.L. PLY 113'-1 1/8" T.O. EXST. MAIN LEVEL PLY 104'-4" T.O. EXISTING GARAGE 100'-3 3/4" EXISTING U.L. PLY 113'-1 1/8" T.O. EXISTING MAIN LEVEL PLY 104'-4" EXISTING MASTER PLY 116'-11 5/8" EXST. MASTER BATH PLY 116'-2 5/8" E E D D C C A A B B T.O. EXISTING GARAGE 100'-3 3/4" EXISTING U.L. PLY 113'-1 1/8" T.O. EXISTING MAIN LEVEL PLY 104'-4" T.O. EXISTING GARAGE 100'-3 3/4" EXISTING U.L. PLY 113'-1 1/8" T.O. EXISTING MAIN LEVEL PLY 104'-4" EXISTING MASTER PLY 116'-11 5/8" EXST. MASTER BATH PLY 116'-2 5/8" SCALE: 1/4" = 1'-0"1 EXISTING SOUTH ELEVATION SCALE: 1/4" = 1'-0"1 EXISTING WEST ELEVATION 138 Scale: AS NOTED ISSUE SCHEMATIC DESIGN PROPOSAL SET LAND USE SET 1" ACTUAL IF THE ABOVE DIMENSION DOES NOT MEASURE ONE INCH (1") EXACTLY, THIS DRAWING WILL HAVE BEEN ENLARGED OR REDUCED, AFFECTING ALL LABELED SCALES. ALL DESIGNS, IDEAS ARRANGEMENTS AND PLANS INDICATED BY THESE DRAWINGS AND SPECIFICATIONS ARE THE PROPERTY AND COPYRIGHT OF KIM RAYMOND ARCHITECTS, INC. AND SHALL NEITHER BE USED ON ANY OTHER WORK NOR BE USED BY ANY OTHER PERSON FOR ANY USE WHATSOEVER WITHOUT WRITTEN PERMISSION. WRITTEN DIMENSIONS SHALL TAKE P R E C E D E N C E O V E R S C A L E D DIMENSIONS AND SHALL BE VERIFIED AT T H E S I T E . A N Y D I M E N S I O N A L DISCREPANCY SHALL BE BROUGHT TO THE ATTENTION OF THE ARCHITECT PRIOR TO COMMENCEMENT OF WORK. A.3.02 3/14/22 EXISTING ELEVATIONS: NORTH & EAST DATE www.kimraymondarchitects.com 970-925-2252191 EASTWOOD191 EASTWOOD ROADASPEN, CO 816117/15/21 7/30/21 11/12/21 1 1 2 2 3 3 4 4 5 5 T.O. EXST. GARAGE 100'-3 3/4" EXST. U.L. PLY 113'-1 1/8" T.O. EXST. MAIN LEVEL PLY 104'-4" T.O. EXISTING GARAGE 100'-3 3/4" EXISTING U.L. PLY 113'-1 1/8" T.O. EXST. MAIN LEVEL PLY 104'-4" EXISTING MASTER PLY 116'-11 5/8" EXST. MASTER BATH PLY 116'-2 5/8" A A B B C C D D E E T.O. EXISTING GARAGE 100'-3 3/4" EXISTING U.L. PLY 113'-1 1/8" T.O. EXISTING MAIN LEVEL PLY 104'-4" T.O. EXISTING GARAGE 100'-3 3/4" EXISTING U.L. PLY 113'-1 1/8" T.O. EXISTING MAIN LEVEL PLY 104'-4" EXISTING MASTER PLY 116'-11 5/8" EXST. MASTER BATH PLY 116'-2 5/8" SCALE: 1/4" = 1'-0"1 EXISTING NORTH ELEVATION SCALE: 1/4" = 1'-0"1 EXISTING EAST ELEVATION 139 Scale: AS NOTED ISSUE SCHEMATIC DESIGN PROPOSAL SET LAND USE SET 1" ACTUAL IF THE ABOVE DIMENSION DOES NOT MEASURE ONE INCH (1") EXACTLY, THIS DRAWING WILL HAVE BEEN ENLARGED OR REDUCED, AFFECTING ALL LABELED SCALES. ALL DESIGNS, IDEAS ARRANGEMENTS AND PLANS INDICATED BY THESE DRAWINGS AND SPECIFICATIONS ARE THE PROPERTY AND COPYRIGHT OF KIM RAYMOND ARCHITECTS, INC. AND SHALL NEITHER BE USED ON ANY OTHER WORK NOR BE USED BY ANY OTHER PERSON FOR ANY USE WHATSOEVER WITHOUT WRITTEN PERMISSION. WRITTEN DIMENSIONS SHALL TAKE P R E C E D E N C E O V E R S C A L E D DIMENSIONS AND SHALL BE VERIFIED AT T H E S I T E . A N Y D I M E N S I O N A L DISCREPANCY SHALL BE BROUGHT TO THE ATTENTION OF THE ARCHITECT PRIOR TO COMMENCEMENT OF WORK. A.3.03 3/14/22 PROPOSED ELEVATIONS: SOUTH & WEST DATE www.kimraymondarchitects.com 970-925-2252191 EASTWOOD191 EASTWOOD ROADASPEN, CO 816117/15/21 7/30/21 11/12/21 6 6 5 5 4 4 3 3 2 2 1 1 D01 D02D03 W03 W02 W31W37 W45W47W49W51W53W55W57W59 W50W52W54W56W58 W27 W23 W36 W01 W34 W44W46W48 W22 W20 W21 W30W32W33W38W35 W26 EXST. U.L. PLY 113'-1 1/8" EXISTING U.L. PLY 113'-1 1/8" T.O. MASTER PLY 116'-2 5/8" PROPOSED GARAGE SLAB 100'-0" PROPOSED GARAGE SLAB 100'-0" PROPOSED M.L. PLY 102'-3 3/4" PROPOSED M.L. PLY 102'-3 3/4" E E D D C C A A B B A1 A1 W40W43 W61 D20 W05W06W07 W39W42W41 W60 W04 EXISTING U.L. PLY 113'-1 1/8" EXISTING U.L. PLY 113'-1 1/8" PROPOSED GARAGE SLAB 100'-0" PROPOSED M.L. PLY 102'-3 3/4" PROPOSED GARAGE SLAB 100'-0" PROPOSED M.L. PLY 102'-3 3/4" T.O. MASTER PLY 116'-2 5/8" SCALE: 1/4" = 1'-0"1 PROPOSED SOUTH ELEVATION SCALE: 1/4" = 1'-0"2 PROPOSED WEST ELEVATION 140 Scale: AS NOTED ISSUE SCHEMATIC DESIGN PROPOSAL SET LAND USE SET 1" ACTUAL IF THE ABOVE DIMENSION DOES NOT MEASURE ONE INCH (1") EXACTLY, THIS DRAWING WILL HAVE BEEN ENLARGED OR REDUCED, AFFECTING ALL LABELED SCALES. ALL DESIGNS, IDEAS ARRANGEMENTS AND PLANS INDICATED BY THESE DRAWINGS AND SPECIFICATIONS ARE THE PROPERTY AND COPYRIGHT OF KIM RAYMOND ARCHITECTS, INC. AND SHALL NEITHER BE USED ON ANY OTHER WORK NOR BE USED BY ANY OTHER PERSON FOR ANY USE WHATSOEVER WITHOUT WRITTEN PERMISSION. WRITTEN DIMENSIONS SHALL TAKE P R E C E D E N C E O V E R S C A L E D DIMENSIONS AND SHALL BE VERIFIED AT T H E S I T E . A N Y D I M E N S I O N A L DISCREPANCY SHALL BE BROUGHT TO THE ATTENTION OF THE ARCHITECT PRIOR TO COMMENCEMENT OF WORK. A.3.04 3/14/22 PROPOSED ELEVATIONS: NORTH & EAST DATE www.kimraymondarchitects.com 970-925-2252191 EASTWOOD191 EASTWOOD ROADASPEN, CO 816117/15/21 7/30/21 11/12/21 1 1 2 2 3 3 4 4 5 5 6 6 W62W65 EXST. U.L. PLY 113'-1 1/8" EXISTING U.L. PLY 113'-1 1/8" T.O. MASTER PLY 116'-2 5/8" A A A1 A1 B B C C D D E E W25 W29 D21 D22 PROPOSED GARAGE SLAB 100'-0" PROPOSED M.L. PLY 102'-3 3/4" PROPOSED GARAGE SLAB 100'-0" PROPOSED M.L. PLY 102'-3 3/4" EXISTING U.L. PLY 113'-1 1/8" EXISTING U.L. PLY 113'-1 1/8" T.O. MASTER PLY 116'-2 5/8" SCALE: 1/4" = 1'-0"1 PROPOSED NORTH ELEVATION SCALE: 1/4" = 1'-0"1 PROPOSED EAST ELEVATION 141