The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink Aboutresolution.council.037-22 RESOLUTION NO. 037 SERIES OF 2022 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF ASPEN CITY COUNCIL APPROVING A CONTRACT FOR THE BURLINGAME CHILDCARE CENTER BETWEEN THE CITY OF ASPEN AND LAND AND SHELTER INC.,AUTHORIZING THE CITY MANAGER TO EXECUTE SAID CONTRACT ON BEHALF OF THE CITY OF ASPEN COLORADO WHEREAS, there has been submitted to the City Council an agreement between the City Council (the "Owner") and Land and Shelter Inc. (the "Architect"), a true and accurate copy of which is attached hereto as "Exhibit A", and, WHERAS, City Council considered and approved the agreement at a regular council meeting on March 22, 2022; NOW,THEREFORE,BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ASPEN AS FOLLOWS: That the City Council of the City of Aspen hereby approves the agreement between Owner and Architect,a copy of which is annexed hereto and incorporated herein, and does hereby authorize the City Manager to execute said agreement on behalf of the City of Aspen. INTRODUCED READ AND ADOPTED by the City Council of the City of Aspen on the 22"d day of March 2022. I Torre,Mayor ATTEST: APPROVED AS TO FORM: Nicole Henning,City C rk ames R True,City Attorney Resolution 037-2022 Burlingame childcare center, architecture contract Page 1 of 1 DocuSign Envelope ID:EE15F568-0A07-4EC9-B1OE-017579121913139 LI-11--AIADocument B132 - 2019 Standard Form of Agreement Between Owner and Architect, Construction Manager as Adviser Edition AGREEMENT made as of the day of March in the year 2022 (In words, indicate day, month, and year.) ADDITIONS AND DELETIONS: The author of this document has BETWEEN the Architect's client identified as the Owner: added information needed for its (Name, legal status, address, and other information) completion.The author may also have revised the text of the original City of Aspen AIA standard form.An Additions and c/o Capital Asset Department Deletions Report that notes added 427 Rio Grande Place information as well as revisions to the Aspen,CO 81611 standard form text is available from the author and should be reviewed.A and the Architect: vertical line in the left margin of this (Name, legal status, address, and other information) document indicates where the author has added necessary information Land and Shelter,Inc. and where the author has added to or P O Box 550 deleted from the original AIA text. Carbondale,CO 81623 This document has important legal consequences.Consultation with an attorney is encouraged with respect for the following Project: to its completion or modification. (Name, location, and detailed description) This document is intended to be used Burlingame Childcare Center project as described in Exhibit B City of Aspen Request for in conjunction with AIA DocumentsA132Tm-2019,Standard Form of Proposals 2021-239 Architecture&Engineering Design Team for the Burlingame Agreement Between Owner and Childcare Center"dated October 22,2021. Contractor,Construction Manager as Adviser Edition;A232Tm-2019, General Conditions of the Contract for Construction,Construction The Construction Manager: Manager as Adviser Edition;and (Name, legal status, address, and other information) C132n"-2019,Standard Form of Agreement Between Owner and TBD Construction Manager as Adviser. AIA Document A232Tm-2019 is adopted in this document by reference.Do not use with other general conditions unless this The Owner and Architect agree as follows. document is modified. Iriit AIA Document B132' -2019.Copyright®1992,2009,and 2019 by The American Institute of Architects.All rights reserved.The"American Institute of Architects,""AIA,'the AIA Logo,and"AIA Contract Documents'are registered trademarks and may not be used without permission.This document was produced by AIA software at 16:44:29 ET on 03/17/2022 under Order No.7357118434 which expires on 08/21/2022,is not for resale,is licensed for one-time use only,and t may only be used in accordance with the AIA Contract Documents®Terms of Service.To report copyright violations,e-mail copyright@aia.org. User Notes: (1148409197) DocuSign Envelope ID:EE15F568-0A07-4EC9-B1 OE-01 7579E1 9BB9 TABLE OF ARTICLES 1 INITIAL INFORMATION 2 ARCHITECT'S RESPONSIBILITIES 3 SCOPE OF ARCHITECT'S BASIC SERVICES 4 SUPPLEMENTAL AND ADDITIONAL SERVICES 5 OWNER'S RESPONSIBILITIES 6 COST OF THE WORK 7 COPYRIGHTS AND LICENSES 8 CLAIMS AND DISPUTES 9 TERMINATION OR SUSPENSION 10 MISCELLANEOUS PROVISIONS 11 COMPENSATION 12 !' SPECIAL TERMS AND CONDITIONS 13' SCOPE OF THE AGREEMENT ARTICLE 1 INITIAL INFORMATION § 1.1 This Agreement is based on the Initial Information set forth in this Section 1.1. (For each item in this section, insert the information or a statement such as "not applicable,"or"unknown at time of execution'.) § 1.1.1 The Owner's program for the Project: (Insert the Owner's program, identify documentation that establishes the Owner's program, or state the manner in which the program will be developed.) The City of Aspen(Owner)will pursue a collaborative development team.CMa is anticipated to be added at the time of Part 2 Services based on the attached exhibits.All project participants are expected to embrace basic teamwork principles such as mutual respect and trust,transparency,collaborative problem solving,open communication and professionalism at all times.The program encompassing Exhibit B City of Aspen Request for Proposals 2021-239 Architecture&Engineering Design Team for the"Burlingame Childcare Center"dated October 22,2021,and additionally described in Exhibit A Land and Shelter,Inc Proposal dated December 14,2021. § 1.1.2 The Project's physical characteristics: (Identify or describe pertinent information about the Project's physical characteristics,such as size;location; dimensions;geotechnical reports;site boundaries;topographic surveys;traffic and utility studies;availability of public and private utilities and services;legal description of the site;etc.) The City of Aspen desires to develop a mixed-use project on vacant property it owns within the Burlingame Subdivision/Planned Development.The programming for the site will include development of a childcare center with appropriate indoor and outdoor spaces,well designed multi-modal circulation for the site and potentially some on-site housing intended for employees of the childcare center.The project is further described in Exhibit B City of Aspen Request for Proposals 2021-239 Architecture&Engineering Design Team for the"Burlingame Childcare Center" dated October 22,2021. § 1.1.3 The Owner's budget for the Cost of the Work,as defined in Section 6.1: Init. AIA Document B132- -2019.Copyright m 1992,2009,and 2019 by The American Institute of Architects.All rights reserved.The"American Institute of Architects,""AIA,"the AIA Logo,and"AIA Contract Documents"are registered trademarks and may not be used without permission.This document was produced 2 by AIA software at 16:44:29 ET on 03/17/2022 under Order No.7357118434 which expires on 08/21/2022,is not for resale,is licensed for one-time use only,and t may only be used In accordance with the AIA Contract Documents®Terms of Service.To report copyright violations,e-mail copyright@aia.org. User Notes: (1148409197) DocuSign Envelope ID:EE1 5F568-0A07-4EC9-B1 OE-01 7579E1 9BB9 (Provide total and, if known, a line item breakdown.) Cost of work is TBD § 1.1.4 The Owner's anticipated design and construction milestone dates:All dates as proposed below to be shifted based on City of Aspen formal notice to proceed. .1 Design phase milestone dates,if any: ftjectSchedule as arltiptgd in�Exhibit A Viand and Shelter1Inc.Proposal dafed IDecember 14.2021! .2 Construction commencement date: PLject Schedule as anticipated in�Exhibit A'Land pnd Shelter.Inc.Proposal dated December 14,:2021 .3 Substantial Completion date or dates: Project Sclle Jule as antic ted j exhibit A Land,aft ddS�hOter:anc;P oppsa date Decemb re 14 202� .4 Other milestone dates: n/a § 1.1.5 The Owner intends the following procurement method for the Project: (Identify method such as competitive bid or negotiated contract.) Request for Proposals § 1.1.6 The Owner's requirements for accelerated or fast-track design and construction,multiple bid packages,or phased construction are set forth below: (Identify any requirements for fast-track scheduling or phased construction and, if applicable,list number and type of bid,procurement packages) n/a § 1.1.7 The Owner's anticipated Sustainable Objective for the Project: (Identify and describe the Owner's Sustainable Objective for the Project, if any.) § 1.1.7.1 If the Owner identifies a Sustainable Objective,the Owner and Architect shall complete and incorporate AIA Document E235-2019,Sustainable Projects Exhibit,Construction Manager as Adviser Edition,into this Agreement to define the terms,conditions and services related to the Owner's Sustainable Objective.If E235-2019 is incorporated into this Agreement,the Owner and Architect shall incorporate the completed E235-2019 into the agreements with the consultants and contractors performing services or Work in any way associated with the Sustainable Objective. § 1.1.8 The Owner identifies the following representative in accordance with Section 5.4: (List name, address, and other contact information.) CMa is TBD until later in the process § 1.1.9 The persons or entities,in addition to the Owner's representative,who are required to review the Architect's submittals to the Owner are as follows: [nit. AIA Document B132" -2019.Copyright m 1992,2009,and 2019 by The American Institute of Architects.All rights reserved.The"American Institute of Architects,""AIA;the AIA Logo,and"AIA Contract Documents"are registered trademarks and may not be used without permission.This document was produced 3 by AIA software at 16:44:29 ET on 03/17/2022 under Order No.7357118434 which expires on 08/21/2022,is not for resale,is licensed for one-time use only,and t may only be used in accordance with the AIA Contract Documents®Terms of Service.To report copyright violations,e-mail copyright@aia.org. User Notes: (1148409197) DocuSign Envelope ID:EE15F568-0A07-4EC9-610E-017579E19BB9 (List name, address, and other contact information.) Jennifer Phelan,Development Manager,City of Aspen,(970)319-9949,jennifer.phelan@aspen.gov § 1.1.10 The Owner shall retain the following consultants and Contractors: (List name, legal status, address, and other contact information.) .1 Construction Manager: - (The Construction Manager is identified on the cover page.If a Construction Manager has not been retained as of the date of this Agreement,state the anticipated date ofretention. If the Architect is to assist the Owner in selecting the Construction Manager, complete Section 4.1.1.1) TBD :2 Land Surveyor: TBD .3 Geotechnical Engineer: TBD .4 Civil Engineer: N/A .5 Other consultants and Contractors: (List any other consultants and Contractors retained by the Owner) n/a § 1.1.11 The Architect identifies the following representative in accordance with Section 2.4: (List name,"address, and other contact information) Andrea Korber,Land+Shelter PO Box 550,Carbondale,CO 81623 970-366-1582 and i@landandshelter.com § 1.1.12 The Architect shall retain the consultants identified in Sections 1.1.12.1 and 1.1.12.2: (List name, legal status, address, and other contact information.) § 1.1.12.1 Consultants retained under Basic Services: .1 Structural Engineer: Init. AIA Document B132- -2019.Copyright m 1992,2009,and 2019 by The American Institute of Architects.All rights reserved.The"American Institute of Architects,""AIA,"the AIA Logo,and"AIA Contract Documents"are registered trademarks and may not be used without permission.This document was produced 4 by AIA software at 16:44:29 ET on 03/17/2022 under Order No.7357118434 which expires on 08/21/2022,is not for resale,is licensed for one-time use only,and t may only be used in accordance with the AIA Contract Documents®Terms of Service.To report copyright violations,e-mail copyright@aia.org. User Notes: (1148409197) DocuSign Envelope ID:EE1 5F568-0A07-4EC9-B1 OE-01 7579EI 9B139 As described in Exhibit A Land and Shelter,Inc.Proposal dated December 14,2021. .2 Mechanical Engineer: As described in Exhibit A Land and Shelter,Inc.Proposal dated December 14,2021. .3 Electrical Engineer: As described in Exhibit A Land and Shelter,Inc.Proposal dated December 14,2021. § 1.1.12.2 Consultants retained under Supplemental Services: Subject Experts,Interior Designer,Traffic Engineer,Civil Engineer,Landscape Architect,Sustainability Consultant, Community Outreach Consultant,Fire Protection,Irrigation Designer,Acoustics&Technology Designer,and Food Service Consultant as described in Exhibit A,Land+Shelter Proposal dated December 14,2021. § 1.1.13 Other Initial Information on which the Agreement is based: § 1.2 The Owner and Architect may rely on the Initial Information.Both parties,however,recognize that the Initial Information may materially change and,in that event,the Owner and the Architect shall appropriately adjust the Architect's services,schedule for the Architect's services,and the Architect's compensation.The Owner shall adjust the Owner's budget for the Cost of the Work and the Owner's anticipated design and construction milestones,as necessary,to accommodate material changes in the Initial Information. § 1.3 The parties shall agree upon protocols governing the transmission and use of Instruments of Service or any other information or documentation in digital form.The parties will use AIA Document E203-2013,Building Information Modeling and Digital Data Exhibit,to establish the protocols for the development,use,transmission,and exchange of digital data. § 1.3.1 Any use of,or reliance on,all or a portion of a building information model without agreement to protocols governing the use of,and reliance on,the information contained in the model and without having those protocols set forth in AIA Document E203-2013,Building Information Modeling and Digital Data Exhibit,and the requisite AIA Document G202-2013,Project Building Information Modeling Protocol Form,shall be at the using or relying parry's sole risk and without liability to the other party and its contractors or consultants,the authors of,or contributors to,the building information model,and each of their agents and employees. § 1.4 The term"Contractors"refers to persons or entities who perform Work under contracts with the Owner that are administered by the Architect and Construction Manager.The term"Contractors"is used to refer to such persons or entities,whether singular or plural.The term does not include the Owner's own forces,or Separate Contractors,which are persons or entities who perform construction under separate contracts with the Owner not administered by the Architect and Construction Manager. ARTICLE 2 ARCHITECT'S RESPONSIBILITIES § 2.1 The Architect shall provide professional services as set forth in this Agreement.The Architect represents that it is properly licensed in the jurisdiction where the Project is located to provide the services required by this Agreement, or shall cause such services to be performed by appropriately licensed design professionals. § 2.2 The Architect shall perform its services consistent with the professional skill and care ordinarily provided by architects practicing in the same or similar locality under the same or similar circumstances.The Architect shall perform its services as expeditiously as is consistent with such professional skill and care and the orderly progress of the Project. Init. AIA Document B132- -2019.Copyright m 1992,2009,and 2019 by The American Institute of Architects.All rights reserved.The"American Institute of Architects,""AIA,'the AIA Logo,and"AIA Contract Documents'are registered trademarks and may not be used without permission.This document was produced 5 by AIA software at 16:44:29 ET on 03/17/2022 under Order No.7357118434 which expires on 08121/2022,is not for resale,is licensed for one-time use only,and may only be used in accordance with the AIA Contract Documents®Terms of Service.To report copyright violations,e-mail copyright@aia.org. User Notes: (1148409197) DocuSign Envelope ID:EE15F568-OA07-4EC9-B10E-017579E19BB9 § 2.3 The Architect shall provide its services in conjunction with the services of a Construction Manager as described in AIA Document C 132Tm-2019,Standard Form of Agreement Between Owner and Construction Manager as Adviser.The Architect shall not be responsible for actions taken by the Construction Manager. § 2.4 The Architect shall identify a representative authorized to act on behalf of the Architect with respect to the Project. § 2.5 Except with the Owner's knowledge and consent,the Architect shall not engage in any activity,or accept any employment,interest or contribution that would reasonably appear to compromise the Architect's professional judgment with respect to this Project. § 2.6 The Architect shall maintain the following insurance until termination of this Agreement.If any of the requirements set forth below are in addition to the types and limits the Architect normally maintains,the Owner shall pay the Architect as set forth in Section 11.9. § 2.6.1'Commercial General Liability with policy limits of not less,than two million U.S.dollars ($2,000,000.00 ) for each occurrence and four million U.S.Dollars ($ 4,000,000.00 )in the aggregate for bodily injury and property damage. § 2.6.2 Automobile Liability covering vehicles owned,and non-owned vehicles used,by the Architect with policy limits of not less than one million U.S.dollars ($ 1,000,000.00 )per accident for bodily injury,death of any person, and property damage arising out of the ownership,maintenance and use of those motor vehicles,along with any other statutorily required automobile coverage. § 2.6.3 The Architect may achieve the required limits and coverage for Commercial General Liability and Automobile Liability through a combination of primary and excess or umbrella liability insurance,provided such primary and excess or umbrella liability insurance policies result in the same or greater coverage as the coverages required under Sections 2.6.1 and 2.6.2,and in no event shall any excess or umbrella liability insurance provide narrower coverage than the primary policy.The excess policy shall not require the exhaustion of the underlying limits only through the actual payment by the underlying insurers. § 2.6.4 Workers'Compensation at statutory limits. § 2.6.5 Employers'Liability with policy limits not less than one million U.S.dollars ($1,000,000.00 )each accident, one million U.S.Dollars ($$1,000,000.00 )each employee,and one million U.S.Dollars($ 1,000,000.00 )policy limit. § 2.6.6 Professional Liability covering negligent acts,errors and omissions in the performance of professional services with policy limits of not less than one million U.S.dollars ($ 1,000,000.00 )per claim and one million U.S.Dollars ($ 1,000,000.00 )in the aggregate. § 2.6.7 Additional Insured Obligations.To the fullest extent permitted by law,the Architect shall cause the primary and excess or umbrella policies for Commercial General Liability and Automobile Liability to include the Owner as an additional insured for claims caused in whole or in part by the Architect's negligent acts or omissions.The additional insured coverage shall be primary and non-contributory to any of the Owner's insurance policies and shall apply to both ongoing and completed operations. § 2.6.8 The Architect shall provide certificates of insurance to the Owner that evidence compliance with the requirements in this Section 2.6. § 2.6.9 The Architect shall provide to the Owner acceptable certificates of insurance evidencing compliance with the requirements in this Section 2.6 prior to commencement of the Work and thereafter upon renewal or replacement of each required policy of insurance.The insurance policies required by this Section,except workers'compensation, shall contain a provision that coverages afforded under the policies will not be canceled or allowed to expire without at least 30 days'prior written notice to the Owner.An additional certificate evidencing continuation of professional liability coverage shall be submitted with the final Application for Payment.Information concerning reduction of coverage on account of claims paid under the policy shall be furnished by the Architect with reasonable promptness. Init. AIA Document B132- -2019.Copyright©1992,2009,and 2019 by The American Institute of Architects.All rights reserved.The"American Institute of Architects,""AIA,'the AIA Logo,and"AIA Contract Documents'are registered trademarks and may not be used without permission.This document was produced 6 by AIA software at 16:44:29 ET on 03/17/2022 under Order No.7357118434 which expires on 08/21/2022,is not for resale,is licensed for one-time use only,and may only be used in accordance with the AIA Contract Documents®Terms of Service.To report copyright violations,e-mail copyright@aia.org. User Notes: (1148409197) DocuSign Envelope ID:EE15F568-OA07-4EC9-B10E-017579E19BB9 The certificates will show the Owner as an additional insured on the Comprehensive General Liability,Automobile Liability,umbrella or excess policies. § 2.6.10 Governmental Immunity: The parties hereto understand and agree that Owner is relying on,and does not waive or intend to waive by any provision of this contract,the monetary limitations(presently$350,000.00 per person and$1,093,000 per occurrence)or any other rights,immunities,and protections provided by the Colorado Governmental Immunity Act,Section 24-10-101 et seq.,C.R.S.,as from time to time amended,or otherwise available to Owner,its officers,or its employees. § 2.6.11 Owner's Insurance:The parties hereto understand that the Owner is a member of the Colorado Intergovern- mental Risk Sharing Agency(CIRSA)and as such participates in the CIRSA Property/Casualty Pool. Copies of the CIRSA policies and manual are kept at the City of Aspen Finance Department and are available to Contractor for inspection during normal business hours. Owner makes no representations whatsoever with respect to specific coverages offered by CIRSA. Owner shall provide reasonable notice of any changes in its membership or participation in CIRSA. § 2.6.12 Deductible: The Architect shall pay any amounts not covered under these policies because of a deductible on the insurance policies provided by the Architect. ARTICLE 3 SCOPE OF ARCHITECT'S BASIC SERVICES § 3.1 The Architect's Basic Services consist only of those described in this Article 3 and in attached Exhibit A Land and Shelter,Inc.Proposal dated December 14,2021,and Exhibit B City of Aspen Request for Proposals 2021-239 Architecture&Engineering Design Team for the"Burlingame Childcare Center"dated October 22,2021.The initial contract includes Parts 1 through 5,from Conceptual/Schematic Design through Construction Documents services described herein and in the referenced exhibits. Additional portions of work may be added as the project moves forward,by amendment of this agreement as Additional Services.CMa is initially TBD.Owner intends to add CMa later in the process.Until Owner hires a CMa,all CMa's obligations under this Agreement are Owner's exclusive responsibility. The initial contract includes: Part 1:Conceptual/Schematic Design Part 2: Support for the Land Use Application and review process Part 3:Design Development Part 4:Approval Documents-recordation support Part 5:Construction Documents As described in attached Exhibit A Land and Shelter,Inc.Proposal dated December 14,2021,and Exhibit B City of Aspen Request for Proposals 2021-239 Architecture&Engineering Design Team for the"Burlingame Childcare Center"dated October 22,2021. Additional portions of work may be added as the project moves forward,by amendment: Part 6:Support for the Building Permit Application Process Part 7:Construction Administration Part 8:Project Closeout and Warranty Support As described in attached Exhibit A Land and Shelter,Inc.Proposal dated December 14,2021,and Exhibit B City of Aspen Request for Proposals 2021-239 Architecture&Engineering Design Team for the"Burlingame Childcare Center"dated October 22,2021. Services other than those specified are Additional Services. § 3.1.1 The Architect shall manage the Architect's services,research applicable design criteria,attend Project meetings,communicate with members of the Project team,and report progress to the Owner. § 3.1.2 The Architect shall coordinate its services with those services provided by the Owner,the Construction Manager,and the Owner's other consultants.The Architect shall be entitled to rely on,and shall not be responsible for, the accuracy,completeness,and timeliness of,services and information furnished by the Owner,the Construction Init. AIA Document B132- -2019.Copyright 01992,2009,and 2019 by The American Institute of Architects.All rights reserved.The"American Institute of Architects,""AIA,'the AIA Logo,and"AIA Contract Documents"are registered trademarks and may not be used without permission.This document was produced 7 by AIA software at 16:44:29 ET on 03/17/2022 under Ober No.7357118434 which expires on 08121/2022,Is not for resale,is licensed for one-time use only,and t may only be used in accordance with the AIA Contract Documents®Terms of Service.To report copyright violations,e-mail copyright@aia.org. User Notes: (1148409197) DocuSign Envelope ID:EE15F568-0A07-4EC9-610E-017579E191369 Manager,and the Owner's other consultants.The Architect shall provide prompt written notice to the Owner if the Architect becomes aware of any error,omission or inconsistency,in such services or information. § 3.1.3 As soon as practicable after the date of this Agreement,the Architect shall submit,for the Construction Manager's review and the Owner's approval,a schedule for the performance of the Architect's services.The schedule shall include design phase milestone dates,as well as the anticipated dates for the commencement of construction and for Substantial Completion of the Work as set forth in the Initial Information.This schedule shall include allowances for periods of time required for the Owner's review,for the Construction Manager's review,for the performance of the Owner's consultants,and for approval of submissions by authorities having jurisdiction over the Project.Once approved by the Owner,time limits established by the schedule shall not,except for reasonable cause,be exceeded by the Architect or Owner.With the Owner's approval,the Architect shall adjust the schedule,if necessary,as the Project proceeds until the commencement of construction. § 3.1.4 The Architect shall submit information to the Construction Manager and participate in developing and revising the Project schedule as it relates to the Architect's services.The Architect shall review and approve,or take other appropriate action upon,the portion of the Project schedule relating to the performance of the Architect's services. § 3.1.5 The Architect shall not be responsible for an Owner's or Construction Manager's directive or substitution,or for'the Owner's acceptance of non-conforming Work,made or given without the Architect's written approval. § 3.1.6 The Architect shall,in coordination with the Construction Manager,contact governmental authorities required to approve the Construction Documents and entities providing utility services to the Project.The Architect shall respond to applicable design requirements imposed by those authorities and entities. § 3.1.7 The Architect shall assist the Owner and Construction Manager in connection with the Owner's responsibility for filing documents required for the approval of governmental authorities having jurisdiction over the Project. §3.1.8 The Architect shall assist the Owner and Construction Manager in connection with the Owner's responsibility for filing documents required for the approval of governmental authorities having jurisdiction over the Project. § 3.2 Schematic Design Phase Services § 3.2.1 The Architect shall review the program and other information furnished by the Owner and Construction Manager,and shall review laws,codes,and regulations applicable to the Architect's services. § 3.2.2 The Architect shall prepare a preliminary evaluation of the Owner's program,schedule,budget for the Cost of the Work,Project site,and the proposed procurement and delivery method,and other Initial Information,each in terms of the other,to ascertain the requirements of the Project.The Architect shall notify the Owner of(1)any inconsistencies discovered in the information,and(2)other information or consulting services that may be reasonably needed for the Project. § 3.2.3 The Architect shall present its preliminary evaluation to the Owner and Construction Manager and shall discuss with the Owner and Construction Manager alternative approaches to design and construction of the Project. The Architect shall reach an understanding with the Owner and Construction Manager regarding the requirements of the Project. § 3.2.4 Based on the Project requirements agreed upon with the Owner,the Architect shall prepare and present,to the Owner and Construction Manager,for the Owner's approval,a preliminary design illustrating the scale and relationship of the Project components. § 3.2.5 Based on the Owner's approval of the preliminary design,the Architect shall prepare Schematic Design Documents for the Construction Manager's review and Owner's approval.The Schematic Design Documents shall consist of drawings and other documents including a site plan,if appropriate,and preliminary building plans,sections and elevations;and may include some combination of study models,perspective sketches,or digital representations. Preliminary selections of major building systems and construction materials shall be noted on the drawings or described in writing. Init AIA Document B132" -2019.Copyright®1992,2009,and 2019 by The American Institute of Architects.All rights reserved.The"American Institute of Architects,""AIA,"the AIA Logo,and"AIA Contract Documents"are registered trademarks and may not be used without permission.This document was produced 8 by AIA software at 16:44:29 ET on 03/17/2022 under Order No.7357118434 which expires on 08121/2022,is not for resale,is licensed for one-time use only,and may only be used in accordance with the AIA Contract Documents®Terms of Service.To report copyright violations,e-mail copyright@aia.org. User Notes: (1148409197) DocuSign Envelope ID:EE1 5F568-0A07-4EC9-B1 OE-01 7579E1 9B139 § 3.2.5.1 The Architect shall consider sustainable design alternatives,such as material choices and building orientation,together with other considerations based on program and aesthetics,in developing a design that is consistent with the Owner's program,schedule and budget for the Cost of the Work.The Owner may obtain more advanced sustainable design services as a Supplemental Service under Section 4.1.1. § 3.2.5.2 The Architect shall consider with the Owner and the Construction Manager the value of alternative materials, building systems and equipment,together with other considerations based on program and aesthetics,in developing a design for the Project that is consistent with the Owner's program,schedule,and budget for the Cost of the Work. § 3.2.6 The Architect shall submit the Schematic Design Documents to the Owner and/or the Construction Manager. The Architect shall meet with the Owner and/or Construction Manager to review the Schematic Design Documents. § 3.2.7 Upon receipt of the Owner and/or Construction Manager's review comments and cost estimate at the conclusion of the Schematic Design Phase,the Architect shall take action as required under Section 6.4,and request the Owner's approval of the Schematic Design Documents.If revisions to the Schematic Design Documents are required to comply with the Owner's budget for the Cost of the Work at the conclusion of the Schematic Design Phase, the Architect shall incorporate such revisions in the Design Development Phase. § 3.2.8 In the further development of the Drawings and Specifications during this and subsequent phases of design,the Architect shall be entitled to rely on the accuracy of the estimates of the Cost of the Work,which are to be provided by the Construction Manager under the Construction Manager's agreement with the Owner. § 3.3 Design Development Phase Services § 3.3.1 Based on the Owner's approval of the Schematic Design Documents,and on the Owner's authorization of any adjustments in the Project requirements and the budget for the Cost of the Work,the Architect shall prepare Design Development Documents for the Construction Manager's review and the Owner's approval.The Design Development Documents shall be based upon information provided,and estimates prepared by,the Construction Manager and shall illustrate and describe the development of the approved Schematic Design Documents and shall consist of drawings and other documents including plans,sections,elevations,typical construction details,and diagrammatic layouts of building systems to fix and describe the size and character of the Project as to architectural,structural,mechanical and electrical systems,and other appropriate elements.The Design Development Documents shall also include outline specifications that identify major materials and systems and establish in general their quality levels. § 3.3.2 Prior to the conclusion of the Design Development Phase,the Architect shall submit the Design Development Documents to the Owner and the Construction Manager.The Architect shall meet with the Construction Manager to review the Design Development Documents. § 3.3.3 Upon receipt of the Construction Manager's information and estimate at the conclusion of the Design Development Phase,the Architect shall take action as required under Sections 6.5 and 6.6 and request the Owner's approval of the Design Development Documents. § 3.4 Construction Documents Phase Services § 3.4.1 Based on the Owner's approval of the Design Development Documents,and on the Owner's authorization of any adjustments in the Project requirements and the budget for the Cost of the Work,the Architect shall prepare Construction Documents for the Construction Manager's review and the Owner's approval.The Construction Documents shall illustrate and describe the further development of the approved Design Development Documents and shall consist of Drawings and Specifications setting forth in detail the quality levels and performance criteria of materials and systems and other requirements for the construction of the Work.The Owner and Architect acknowledge that,in order to perform the Work,the Contractor will provide additional information,including Shop Drawings,Product Data,Samples and other similar submittals,which the Architect shall review in accordance with Section 3.6.4. § 3.4.2 The Architect shall incorporate the design requirements of governmental authorities having jurisdiction over the Project into the Construction Documents. § 3.4.3 During the development of the Construction Documents,if requested by the Owner,the Architect shall assist the Owner and the Construction Manager in the development and preparation of(1)procurement information that Init. AIA Document B132- -2019.Copyrightm 1992,2009,and 2019 by The American Institute of Architects.All rights reserved.The'American Institute of Architects,`"AIA,'the AIA Logo,and"AIA Contract Documents'are registered trademarks and may not be used without permission.This document was produced 9 by AIA software at 16:44:29 ET on 03/17/2022 under Order No.7357118434 which expires on 08/21/2022,is not for resale,is licensed for one-time use only,and may only be used in accordance with the AIA Contract Documents®Terms of Service.To report copyright violations,e-mail copyright@aia.org. User Notes: (1148409197) DocuSign Envelope ID:EE15F568-OA07-4EC9-B10E-017579E19BB9 describes the time,place,and conditions of bidding,including bidding or proposal forms;(2)the form of agreements between the Owner and Contractors;and(3)the Conditions of the Contracts for Construction(General, Supplementary and other Conditions);and(4)a project manual that includes the Conditions of the Contracts for Construction and Specifications,and may include bidding requirements and sample forms. § 3.4.4 Prior to the conclusion of the Construction Documents Phase,the Architect shall submit the Construction Documents to the Owner and the Construction Manager.The Architect shall meet with the Construction Manager to review the Construction Documents. § 3.4.5 Upon receipt of the Construction Manager's information and an estimate at the conclusion of the Construction Documents Phase,the Architect shall take action as required under Section 6.7,and request the Owner's approval of the Construction Documents. § 3.5 Procurement Phase Services § 3.5.1 General The Architect shall assist the Owner and Construction Manager in establishing a list of prospective contractors. Following the Owner's approval of the Construction Documents,the Architect shall assist the Owner and Construction Manager in(1)obtaining either competitive bids or negotiated proposals;(2)confirming responsiveness of bids or proposals;(3)determining the successful bid or proposal,if any;and(4)awarding and preparing Contracts for Construction. § 3.5.2 Competitive Bidding § 3.5.2.1 Bidding Documents shall consist of bidding requirements and proposed Contract Documents. § 3.5.2.2 The Architect shall assist the Owner and Construction Manager in bidding the Project by .1 facilitating the distribution of Bidding Documents to prospective bidders; .2 organizing and conducting a pre-bid conference for prospective bidders; .3 preparing responses to questions from prospective bidders and providing clarifications and interpretations of the Bidding Documents to the prospective bidders in the form of addenda;and (Paragraph deleted) § 3.5.2.3 If the Bidding Documents permit substitutions,upon the Owner's written authorization,the Architect shall, as an Additional Service,consider requests for substitutions,and prepare and distribute addenda identifying approved substitutions to all prospective bidders. § 3.5.3 Negotiated Proposals § 3.5.3.1 Proposal Documents shall consist of proposal requirements,and proposed Contract Documents. § 3.5.3.2 The Architect shall assist the Owner and Construction Manager in obtaining proposals by: .1 facilitating the distribution of Proposal Documents for distribution to prospective Contractors,and requesting their return upon completion of the negotiation process; .2 organizing and participating in selection interviews with prospective Contractors; .4 participating in negotiations with prospective Contractors,and subsequently preparing a summary report of the negotiation results,as directed by the Owner. § 3.5.3.3 If the Proposal Documents permit substitutions,upon the Owner's written authorization,the Architect shall, as an Additional Service,consider requests for substitutions,consult with the Construction Manager,and prepare and distribute addenda identifying approved substitutions to all prospective contractors. § 3.6 Construction Phase Services § 3.6.1 General § 3.6.1.1 The Architect shall provide administration of the Contract between the Owner and the Contractor as set forth below and in AIA Document A232Tm-2019,General Conditions of the Contract for Construction,Construction Manager as Adviser Edition.If the Owner and Contractor modify AIA Document A232-2019,those modifications shall not affect the Architect's services under this Agreement unless the Owner and the Architect amend this Agreement. Init. AIA Document B132- -20 t 9.Copyright m 1992,2009,and 2019 by The American Institute of Architects.All rights reserved.The"American Institute of Architects,""AIA,"the AIA Logo,and"AIA Contract Documents"are registered trademarks and may not be used without permission.This document was produced 10 by AIA software at 16:44:29 ET on 03/17/2022 under Order No.7357118434 which expires on 08/21/2022,is not for resale,is licensed for one-time use only,and t may only be used in accordance with the AIA Contract Documents®Terms of Service.To report copyright violations,e-mail copydght@aia.org. User Notes: (1148409197) DocuSign Envelope ID:EE1 5F568-0A07-4EC9-B1 OE-01 7579EI 9BB9 § 3.6.1.2 The Architect shall advise and consult with the Owner and Construction Manager during the Construction Phase Services.The Architect shall have authority to act on behalf of the Owner only to the extent provided in this Agreement.The Architect shall not have control over,charge of,or responsibility for the construction means, methods,techniques,sequences or procedures,or for safety precautions and programs in connection with the Work, nor shall the Architect be responsible for the Contractors'failure to perform the Work in accordance with the requirements of the Contract Documents.The Architect shall be responsible for the Architect's negligent acts or omissions,but shall not have control over or charge of,and shall not be responsible for acts or omissions of the Construction Manager,or acts or omissions of the Contractors or of any other persons or entities performing portions of the Work. § 3.6.1.3 Subject to Section 4.2,and except as provided in Section 3.6.6.5,the Architect's responsibility to provide Construction Phase Services commences with the award of the initial Contract for Construction and terminates on the date the Architect issues the final Certificate for Payment. § 3.6.2 Evaluations of the Work § 3.6.2.1 The Architect shall visit the site at intervals appropriate to the stage of construction,or as otherwise required in Section 4.2.3,to become generally familiar with the progress and quality of the portion of the Work completed,and to determine,in general,if the Work observed is being performed in a manner indicating that the Work,when fully completed,will be in accordance with the Contract Documents.However,the Architect shall not be required to make exhaustive or continuous on-site inspections to check the quality or quantity of the Work.On the basis of the site visits, the Architect shall keep the Owner reasonably informed about the progress and quality of the portion of the Work completed,and promptly report to the Owner and the Construction Manager(1)known deviations from the Contract Documents,(2)known deviations from the most recent construction schedule submitted by the Construction Manager, and(3)defects and deficiencies observed in the Work. § 3.6.2.2 The Architect has the authority to reject Work that does not conform to the Contract Documents and shall notify the Construction Manager about the rejection.Whenever the Architect considers it necessary or advisable,the Architect,upon written authorization from the Owner and notification to the Construction Manager,shall have the authority to require inspection or testing of the Work in accordance with the provisions of the Contract Documents, whether or not the Work is fabricated,installed or completed.However,neither this authority of the Architect nor a decision made in good faith either to exercise or not to exercise such authority shall give rise to a duty or responsibility of the Architect to the Contractors,Subcontractors,suppliers,their agents or employees,or other persons or entities performing portions of the Work. § 3.6.2.3 The Architect shall interpret and decide matters concerning performance under,and requirements of,the Contract Documents on written request of the Construction Manager,Owner,or Contractors through the Construction Manager.The Architect's response to such requests shall be made in writing within any time limits agreed upon or otherwise with reasonable promptness. § 3.6.2.4 Interpretations and decisions of the Architect shall be consistent with the intent of,and reasonably inferable from,the Contract Documents and shall be in writing or in the form of drawings.When making such interpretations and decisions,the Architect shall endeavor to secure faithful performance by the Owner and Contractors,shall not show partiality to either,and shall not be liable for results of interpretations or decisions rendered in good faith.The Architect's decisions on matters relating to aesthetic effect shall be final if consistent with the intent expressed in the Contract Documents. § 3.6.2.5 Unless the Owner and Contractors designate another person to serve as an Initial Decision Maker,as that term is defined in AIA Document A232-2019,the Architect,with the assistance of the Construction Manager,shall render initial decisions on Claims between the Owner and Contractors as provided in the Contract Documents. § 3.6.3 Certificates for Payment to Contractor § 3.6.3.1 Not more frequently than monthly,the Architect shall review and certify an application for payment.Within seven days after the Architect receives an application for payment forwarded from the Construction Manager,the Architect shall review and certify the application as follows: .1 Where there is only one Contractor responsible for performing the Work,the Architect shall review the Contractor's Application and Certificate for Payment that the Construction Manager has previously Init. AIA Document B132' -2019.Copyright m 1992,2009,and 2019 by The American Institute of Architects.All rights reserved.The"American Institute of Architects,'"AIA,'the AIA Logo,and"AIA Contract Documents"are registered trademarks and may not be used without permission.This document was produced 11 by AIA software at 16:44:29 ET on 03/17/2022 under Order No.7357118434 which expires on 08/21/2022,is not for resale,is licensed for one-time use only,and may only be used in accordance with the AIA Contract Documents®Terms of Service.To report copyright violations,e-mail copyright@aia.org. User Notes: (1148409197) DocuSign Envelope ID:EE15F568-0A07-4EC9-B1 OE-017579E191369 reviewed and certified.The Architect shall certify the amount due the Contractor and shall issue a Certificate for Payment in such amount. .2 Where there is more than one Contractor responsible for performing different portions of the Project, the Architect shall review the Project Application and Project Certificate for Payment,with the Summary of Contractors'Applications for Payment,that the Construction Manager has previously prepared,reviewed,and certified.The Architect shall certify the total amount due all Contractors collectively and shall issue a Project Certificate for Payment in the total of such amounts. § 3.6.3.2 The Architect's certification for payment shall constitute a representation to the Owner,based on(1)the Architect's evaluation of the Work as provided in Section 3.6.2,(2)the data comprising the Contractor's Application for Payment or the data comprising the Project Application for Payment,and(3)the recommendation of the Construction Manager,that,to the best of the Architect's knowledge,information and belief,the Work has progressed to the point indicated,the quality of the Work is in accordance with the Contract Documents,and that the Contractors are entitled to payment in the amount certified.The foregoing representations are subject to(1)an evaluation of the Work for conformance with the Contract Documents upon Substantial Completion,(2)results of subsequent tests and inspections,(3)correction of minor deviations from the Contract Documents prior to completion,and(4)specific qualifications expressed by the Architect. § 3.6.3.3 The issuance of a Certificate for Payment or a Project Certificate for Payment shall not be a representation that the Architect has(1)made exhaustive or continuous on-site inspections to check the quality or quantity of the Work,(2)reviewed construction means,methods,techniques,sequences or procedures,(3)reviewed copies of requisitions received from Subcontractors and suppliers and other data requested by the Owner to substantiate each Contractor's right to payment;or(4)ascertained how or for what purpose that Contractor has used money previously paid on account of the Contract Sum. § 3.6.3.4 The Architect shall maintain a record of the Applications and Certificates for Payment. § 3.6.4 Submittals § 3.6.4.1 The Architect shall review the Construction Manager's Project submittal schedule and shall not unreasonably delay or withhold approval of the schedule.The Architect's action in reviewing submittals transmitted by the Construction Manager shall be taken in accordance with the approved submittal schedule or,in the absence of an approved submittal schedule,with reasonable promptness while allowing sufficient time,in the Architect's professional judgment,to permit adequate review. § 3.6.4.2 The Architect shall review and approve,or take other appropriate action upon,the Contractors' submittals such as Shop Drawings,Product Data and Samples,that the Construction Manager has reviewed,recommended for approval,and transmitted to the Architect.The Architect's review of the submittals shall only be for the limited purpose of checking for conformance with information given and the design concept expressed in the Contract Documents.Review of such submittals is not for the purpose of determining the accuracy and completeness of other information such as dimensions,quantities,and installation or performance of equipment or systems,which are the Contractors'responsibilities.The Architect's review shall not constitute approval of safety precautions or construction means,methods,techniques,sequences or procedures.The Architect's approval of a specific item shall not indicate approval of an assembly of which the item is a component. § 3.6.4.3 If the Contract Documents specifically require the Contractors to provide professional design services or certifications by a design professional related to systems,materials or equipment,the Architect shall specify the appropriate performance and design criteria that such services must satisfy.The Architect shall review and take appropriate action on Shop Drawings and other submittals related to the Work designed or certified by the Contractors'design professionals,provided the submittals bear such professionals'seal and signature when submitted to the Architect.The Architect's review shall be for the limited purpose of checking for conformance with information given and the design concept expressed in the Contract Documents.The Architect shall be entitled to rely upon,and shall not be responsible for,the adequacy and accuracy of the services,certifications,and approvals performed or provided by such design professionals. § 3.6.4.4 After receipt of the Construction Manager's recommendations,and subject to the provisions of Section 4.2, the Architect shall review and respond to requests for information about the Contract Documents.The Architect,in consultation with the Construction Manager,shall set forth in the Contract Documents the requirements for requests Init. AIA Document B132" -2019.Copyright m 1992,2009.and 2019 by The American Institute of Architects.All rights reserved.The"American Institute of Architects,""AIA,"the AIA Logo,and"AIA Contract Documents"are registered trademarks and may not be used without permission.This document was produced 12 by AIA software at 16:44:29 ET on 03/17/2022 under Order No.7357118434 which expires on 08/21/2022,is not for resale,is licensed for one-time use only,and may only be used in accordance with the AIA Contract Documents®Terms of Service.To report copyright violations,e-mail copyright@aia.org. User Notes: (1148409197) DocuSign Envelope ID:EE15F568-OA07-4EC9-B10E-017579E19BB9 for information.Requests for information shall include,at a minimum,a detailed written statement that indicates the specific Drawings or Specifications in need of clarification and the nature of the clarification requested.The Architect's response to such requests shall be made in writing within any time limits agreed upon,or otherwise with reasonable promptness.If appropriate,the Architect shall prepare and issue supplemental Drawings and Specifications in response to the requests for information. § 3.6.4.5 The Architect shall maintain a record of submittals and copies of submittals transmitted by the Construction Manager in accordance with the requirements of the Contract Documents. § 3.6.5 Changes in the Work § 3.6.5.1 The Architect shall review and sign,or take other appropriate action,on Change Orders and Construction Change Directives prepared by the Construction Manager for the Owner's approval and execution in accordance with the Contract Documents. § 3.6.5.2 The Architect may order minor changes in the Work that are consistent with the intent of the Contract Documents and do not involve an adjustment in the Contract Sum or an extension of the Contract Time.Such changes shall be effected by written order issued by the Architect through the Construction Manager. § 3.6.5.3 The Architect shall maintain records relative to changes in the Work. § 3.6.6 Project Completion § 3.6.6.1 The Architect,assisted by the Construction Manager,shall: .1 conduct inspections to determine the date of Substantial Completion and the date of final completion; .2 issue a Certificate of Substantial Completion prepared by the Construction Manager; .3 review written warranties and related documents required by the Contract Documents and received from the Contractors,through the Construction Manager;and .4 after receipt of a final Contractor's Application and Certificate for Payment or a final Project Application and Project Certificate for Payment from the Construction Manager,issue a final Certificate for Payment based upon a final inspection indicating that,to the best of the Architect's knowledge,information,and belief,the Work complies with the requirements of the Contract Documents. § 3.6.6.2 The Architect's inspections shall be conducted with the Owner and Construction Manager to(1)check conformance of the Work with the requirements of the Contract Documents and(2)verify the accuracy and completeness of the lists submitted by the Construction Manager and Contractors of Work to be completed or corrected. § 3.6.6.3 When Substantial Completion has been achieved,the Architect shall inform the Owner about the balance of the Contract Sum remaining to be paid each of the Contractors,including the amount to be retained from the Contract Sum,if any,for final completion or correction of the Work. § 3.6.6.4 The Architect shall forward to the Owner the following information received from the Contractors,through the Construction Manager:(1)consent of surety or sureties,if any,to reduction in or partial release of retainage or the making of final payment;(2)affidavits,receipts,releases and waivers of liens,or bonds indemnifying the Owner against liens;and(3)any other documentation required of the Contractors under the Contract Documents. § 3.6.6.5 Upon request of the Owner,and prior to the expiration of one year from the date of Substantial Completion, the Architect shall,without additional compensation,conduct a meeting with the Owner and Construction Manager to review the facility operations and performance. ARTICLE 4 SUPPLEMENTAL AND ADDITIONAL SERVICES § 4.1 Supplemental Services § 4.1.1 The additional services listed in Exhibit C are not included in Basic Services but may be required for the Project.The Architect shall provide the listed Supplemental Services only if specifically selected by future addendum as the Architect's responsibility,and the Owner shall compensate the Architect as provided in Section 11.2.Unless otherwise specifically addressed in this Agreement,if neither the Owner nor the Architect is designated,the parties agree that the listed Supplemental Service is not being provided for the Project. Init. AIA Document B732- -2019.Copyright m 1992,2009,and 2019 by The American Institute of Architects.All rights reserved.The"American Institute of Architects,""AIA,"the AIA Logo,and"AIA Contract Documents"are registered trademarks and may not be used without permission.This document was produced 13 by AIA software at 16:44:29 ET on 03/17/2022 under Order No.7357118434 which expires on 08121/2022,is not for resale,is licensed for one-time use only,and may only be used in accordance with the AIA Contract Documents®Terms of Service.To report copyright violations,e-mail copydght@aia.org. User Notes: (1148409197) DocuSign Envelope ID:EE15F568-0A07-4EC9-610E-017579E19B139 (Paragraph deleted) Refer to Exhibit C Fee Schedule for list of Basic and Additional Services. (Table deleted) § 4.1.2 Description of Supplemental Services § 4.1.2.1 A description of each Supplemental Service identified in Section 4.1.1 as the Architect's responsibility is provided below. (Describe in detail the Architect's Supplemental Services identified in Section 4.L I or, if set forth in an exhibit, identify the exhibit. The AIA publishes a number of Standard Form of Architect's Services documents that can be included as an exhibit to describe the Architect's Supplemental Services) See Exhibit C § 4.1.2.2 A description of each Supplemental Service identified in Section 4.1.1 as the Owner's responsibility is provided below. (Describe in detail the Owner's Supplemental Services identified in Section 4.L I or, if set forth in an exhibit, identify the exhibit.) § 4.1.3 If the Owner identified a Sustainable Objective in Article 1,the Architect shall provide,as a Supplemental Service,the Sustainability Services required in AIA Document E235Tm-2019,Sustainable Projects Exhibit, Construction Manager as Adviser Edition,attached to this Agreement.The Owner shall compensate the Architect as provided in Section 11.2. § 4.2 Architect's Additional Services The Architect may provide Additional Services after execution of this Agreement,without invalidating the Agreement.Except for services required due to the fault of the Architect,any Additional Services provided in accordance with this Section 4.2 shall entitle the Architect to compensation pursuant to Section 11.3 and an appropriate adjustment in the Architect's schedule. § 4.2.1 Upon recognizing the need to perform the following Additional Services,the Architect shall notify the Owner with reasonable promptness and explain the facts and circumstances giving rise to the need.The Architect shall not proceed to provide the following Additional Services until the Architect receives the Owner's written authorization: .1 Services necessitated by a change in the Initial Information,previous instructions or recommendations given by the Construction Manager or the Owner,approvals given by the Owner,or a material change in the Project including size,quality,complexity,building systems,the Owner's schedule or budget for Cost of the Work,constructability considerations,procurement or delivery method,or bid packages in addition to those listed in Section 1.1.6; .2 Making revisions in Drawings,Specifications,or other documents(as required pursuant to Section 6.7),when such revisions are required because the Construction Manager's estimate of the Cost of the Work exceeds the Owner's budget,except where such excess is due to changes initiated by the Architect in scope,capacities of basic systems,or the kinds and quality of materials,finishes or equipment; .3 Services necessitated by enactment or revision of codes,laws,or regulations,including changing or editing previously prepared Instruments of Service; .4 Changing or editing previously prepared Instruments of Service necessitated by official interpretations of applicable codes,laws or regulations that are either(a)contrary to specific interpretations by the applicable authorities having jurisdiction made prior to the issuance of the building permit,or(b) contrary to requirements of the Instruments of Service when those Instruments of Service were prepared in accordance with the applicable standard of care; ,5 Services necessitated by decisions of the Owner or Construction Manager not rendered in a timely manner or any other failure of performance on the part of the Owner,Construction Manager or the Owner's other consultants or contractors; .6 Preparing digital models or other design documentation for transmission to the Owner's consultants and contractors,or to other Owner-authorized recipients; Init. AIA Document B732- -20 19.Copyright m 1992,2009,and 2019 by The American Institute of Architects.All rights reserved.The"American Institute of Architects,""AIA,"the AIA Logo,and"AIA Contract Documents"are registered trademarks and may not be used without permission.This document was produced 14 by AIA software at 16:44:29 ET on 03/17/2022 under Order No.7357118434 which expires on 08121/2022,is not for resale,is licensed for one-time use only,and t may only be used in accordance with the AIA Contract Documents®Terms of Service.To report copyright violations,e-mail copyright@aia.org. User Notes: (1148409197) DocuSign Envelope ID:EE15F568-0A07-4EC9-B1OE-017579E19BB9 .7 Preparation of design and documentation for alternate bid or proposal requests proposed by the Owner or Construction Manager; .8 Preparation for,and attendance at,a public presentation,meeting or hearing; .9 Preparation for,and attendance at,a dispute resolution proceeding or legal proceeding,except where the Architect is party thereto; .10 Evaluation of the qualifications of entities providing bids or proposals; .11 Consultation concerning replacement of Work resulting from fire or other cause during construction;or .12 Assistance to the Initial Decision Maker,if other than the Architect. § 4.2.2 To avoid delay in the Construction Phase,the Architect shall provide the following Additional Services,notify the Owner with reasonable promptness,and explain the facts and circumstances giving rise to the need.If,upon receipt of the Architect's notice,the Owner determines that all or parts of the services are not required,the Owner shall give prompt written notice to the Architect of the Owner's determination.The Owner shall compensate the Architect for the services provided prior to the Architect's receipt of the Owner's notice: .1 Reviewing a Contractor's submittal out of sequence from the Project submittal schedule approved by the Architect; .2 Responding to the Contractors'requests for information that are not prepared in accordance with the Contract Documents or where such information is available to the Contractors from a careful study and comparison of the Contract Documents,field conditions,other Owner-provided information, Contractor-prepared coordination drawings,or prior Project correspondence or documentation; .3 Preparing Change Orders,and Construction Change Directives that require evaluation of Contractors' proposals and supporting data,or the preparation or revision of Instruments of Service; .4 Evaluating an extensive number of Claims as the Initial Decision Maker;or .5 Evaluating substitutions proposed by the Owner,Construction Manager or Contractors and making subsequent revisions to Instruments of Service resulting therefrom. § 4.2.3 The Architect shall provide Construction Phase Services exceeding the limits set forth below as Additional Services.When the limits below are reached,the Architect shall notify the Owner: TBD upon addition of construction phase services by amendment .1 ( )reviews of each Shop Drawing,Product Data item,sample and similar submittals of the Contractors .2 ( )visits to the site by the Architect during construction .3 ( )inspections for any portion of the Work to determine whether such portion of the Work is substantially complete in accordance with the requirements of the Contract Documents .4 ( )inspections for any portion of the Work to determine final completion § 4.2.4 Except for services required under Section 3.6.6.5 and those services that do not exceed the limits set forth in Section 4.2.3,Construction Phase Services provided more than 60 days after(1)the date of Substantial Completion of the Work,or(2)the anticipated date of Substantial Completion identified in the Initial Information,whichever is earlier,shall be compensated as Additional Services to the extent the Architect incurs additional cost in providing those Construction Phase Services. § 4.2.5 If the services covered by this Agreement have not been completed within twenty-four( 24 )months of the date of this Agreement,through no fault of the Architect,extension of the Architect's services beyond that time shall be compensated as Additional Services. ARTICLE 5 OWNER'S RESPONSIBILITIES § 5.1 Unless otherwise provided for under this Agreement,the Owner shall provide information in a timely manner regarding requirements for and limitations on the Project,including a written program which shall set forth the Owner's objectives,schedule,constraints and criteria,including space requirements and relationships,flexibility, expandability,special equipment,systems and site requirements. § 5.2 The Owner shall retain a Construction Manager to provide services,duties and responsibilities as described in AIA Document C132-2019,Standard Form of Agreement Between Owner and Construction Manager as Adviser. The Owner shall provide the Architect with a copy of the scope of services in the agreement executed between the [nit. AIA Document B132- -2019.Copyright m 1992,2009,and 2019 by The American Institute of Architects.All rights reserved.The"American Institute of Architects,""AIA,'the AIA Logo,and"AIA Contract Documents'are registered trademarks and may not be used without permission.This document was produced 15 by AIA software at 16:44:29 ET on 03/17/2022 under Order No.7357118434 which expires on 08/21/2022,is not for resale,is licensed for one-time use only,and may only be used in accordance with the AIA Contract Documents®Terms of Service.To report copyright violations,e-mail copyright@aia.org. User Notes: (1148409197) DocuSign Envelope ID:EE15F568-0A07-4EC9-B1OE-017579E19BB9 Owner and the Construction Manager,and any subsequent modifications to the Construction Manager's scope of services in the agreement. § 5.3 The Owner shall establish the Owner's budget for the Project,including(1)the budget for the Cost of the Work as defined in Section 6.1;(2)the Owner's other costs;and(3)reasonable contingencies related to all of these costs. The Owner shall update the Owner's budget for the Project as necessary throughout the duration of the Project until final completion.If the Owner significantly increases or decreases the Owner's budget for the Cost of the Work,the Owner shall notify the Architect and the Construction Manager.The Owner and the Architect,in consultation with the Construction Manager,shall thereafter agree to a corresponding change in the Project's scope and quality. § 5.3.1 The Owner acknowledges that accelerated,phased or fast-track scheduling provides a benefit,but also carries with it associated risks.Such risks include the Owner incurring costs for the Architect to coordinate and redesign portions of the Project affected by procuring or installing elements of the Project prior to the completion of all relevant Construction Documents,and costs for the Contractors to remove and replace previously installed Work.If the Owner selects accelerated,phased or fast-track scheduling,the Owner agrees to include in the budget for the Project sufficient contingencies to cover such costs. § 5.4 The Owner shall identify a representative authorized to act on the Owner's behalf with respect to the Project.The Owner shall render decisions and approve the Architect's submittals in a timely manner in order to avoid unreasonable delay in the orderly and sequential progress of the Architect's services. § 5.5 The Owner shall furnish surveys to describe physical characteristics,legal limitations and utility locations for the site of the Project,and a written legal description of the site.The surveys and legal information shall include,as applicable,grades and lines of streets,alleys,pavements and adjoining property and structures;designated wetlands; adjacent drainage;rights-of-way,restrictions,easements,encroachments,zoning,deed restrictions,boundaries and contours of the site;locations,dimensions,and other necessary data with respect to existing buildings,other improvements and trees;and information concerning available utility services and lines,both public and private, above and below grade,including inverts and depths.All the information on the survey shall be referenced to a Project benchmark. § 5.6 The Owner shall furnish services of geotechnical engineers,which may include test borings,test pits, determinations of soil bearing values,percolation tests,evaluations of hazardous materials,seismic evaluation,ground corrosion tests and resistivity tests,including necessary operations for anticipating subsoil conditions,with written reports and appropriate recommendations. § 5.7 The Owner shall provide the Supplemental Services designated as the Owner's responsibility in Section 4.1.1. § 5.8 If the Owner identified a Sustainable Objective in Article 1,the Owner shall fulfill its responsibilities as required in AIA Document E235TA1-2019,Sustainable Projects Exhibit,Construction Manager as Adviser Edition,attached to this Agreement. § 5.9 The Owner shall coordinate the services of its own consultants with those services provided by the Architect. Upon the Architect's request,the Owner shall furnish copies of the scope of services in the contracts between the Owner and the Owner's consultants.The Owner shall furnish the services of consultants other than those designated as the responsibility of the Architect in this Agreement,or authorize the Architect to furnish them as an Additional Service,when the Architect requests such services and demonstrates that they are reasonably required by the scope of the Project.The Owner shall require that its consultants and contractors maintain insurance,including professional liability insurance,as appropriate to the services or work provided. § 5.10 The Owner shall furnish tests,inspections and reports required by law or the Contract Documents,such as structural,mechanical,and chemical tests,tests for air and water pollution,and tests for hazardous materials. § 5.11 The Owner shall furnish all legal,insurance and accounting services,including auditing services,that may be reasonably necessary at any time for the Project to meet the Owner's needs and interests. Init. AIA Document B132" -2019.Copyright m 1992,2009,and 2019 by The American Institute of Architects.All rights reserved.The"American Institute of Architects,""AIA,'the AIA Logo,and"AIA Contract Documents"are registered trademarks and may not be used without permission.This document was produced s by AIA software at 16:44:29 ET on 03/17/2022 under Order No.7357118434 which expires on 08/21/2022,is not for resale,Is licensed for one-time use only,and may only be used in accordance with the AIA Contract Documents®Terms of Service.To report copyright violations,e-mail copyright@aia.org. User Notes: (1148409197) DocuSign Envelope ID:EE15F568-OA07-4EC9-B10E-017579E19B139 § 5.12 The Owner shall provide prompt written notice to the Architect and Construction Manager if the Owner becomes aware of any fault or defect in the Project,including errors,omissions or inconsistencies in the Architect's Instruments of Service. § 5.13 The Owner shall communicate with the Contractors and the Construction Manager's consultants through the Construction Manager about matters arising out of or relating to the Contract Documents.The Owner and Construction Manager shall include the Architect in all communications that relate to or affect the Architect's services or professional responsibilities.The Owner shall promptly notify the Architect of the substance of any direct communications between the Owner and the Construction Manager otherwise relating to the Project.Communications by and with the Architect's consultants shall be through the Architect. § 5.14 Before executing the Contracts for Construction,the Owner shall coordinate the Architect's duties and responsibilities set forth in the Contracts for Construction with the Architect's services set forth in this Agreement. The Owner shall provide the Architect a copy of the executed agreements between the Owner and Contractors, including the General Conditions of the Contracts for Construction. § 5.15 The Owner shall provide the Architect access to the Project site prior to commencement of the Work and shall obligate the Construction Manager and Contractors to provide the Architect access to the Work wherever it is in preparation or progress. § 5.16 Within 15 days after receipt of a written request from the Architect,the Owner shall furnish the requested information as necessary and relevant for the Architect to evaluate,give notice of,or enforce lien rights. ARTICLE 6 COST OF THE WORK § 6.1 For purposes of this Agreement,the Cost of the Work shall be the total cost to the Owner to construct all elements of the Project designed or specified by the Architect and shall include the Contractors'general conditions costs,overhead and profit.The Cost of the Work includes the compensation of the Construction Manager and Construction Manager's consultants during the Construction Phase only,including compensation for reimbursable expenses at the job site,if any.The Cost of the Work also includes the reasonable value of labor,materials,and equipment,donated to,or otherwise furnished by,the Owner.The Cost of the Work does not include the compensation of the Architect;the costs of the land,rights-of-way,financing,or contingencies for changes in the Work;or other costs that are the responsibility of the Owner. § 6.2 The Owner's budget for the Cost of the Work once provided may be adjusted throughout the Project as required under Sections 5.3 and 6.4.Evaluations of the Owner's budget for the Cost of the Work represent the Architect's judgment as a design professional. § 6.3 The Owner shall require the Construction Manager to include appropriate contingencies for design,bidding or negotiating,price escalation,and market conditions in estimates of the Cost of the Work.The Architect shall be entitled to rely on the accuracy and completeness of estimates of the Cost of the Work the Construction Manager prepares as the Architect progresses with its Basic Services.The Architect shall prepare,as an Additional Service, revisions to the Drawings,Specifications or other documents required due to the Construction Manager's inaccuracies or incompleteness in preparing cost estimates,or due to market conditions the Architect could not reasonably anticipate.The Architect may review the Construction Manager's estimates solely for the Architect's guidance in completion of its services,however,the Architect shall report to the Owner any material inaccuracies and inconsistencies noted during any such review. § 6.3.1 If the Architect is providing cost estimating services as a Supplemental Service,and a discrepancy exists between the Construction Manager's cost estimates and the Architect's cost estimates,the Architect and the Construction Manager shall work together to reconcile the cost estimates. § 6.4 If,prior to the conclusion of the Design Development Phase,the Construction Manager's estimate of the Cost of the Work exceeds the Owner's budget for the Cost of the Work,the Architect,in consultation with the Construction Manager,shall make appropriate recommendations to the Owner to adjust the Project's size,quality or budget for the Cost of the Work,and the Owner shall cooperate with the Architect in making such adjustments. Init. AIA Document B132- -2019.Copyright®1992,2009,and 2019 by The American Institute of Architects.All rights reserved.The"American Institute of Architects,'"AIA,"the AIA Logo,and"AIA Contract Documents"are registered trademarks and may not be used without permission.This document was produced 17 by AIA software at 16:44:29 ET on 03/17/2022 under Order No.7357118434 which expires on 08/21/2022,is not for resale,is licensed for one-time use only,and may only be used in accordance with the AIA Contract Documents®Terms of Service.To report copyright violations,e-mail copyright@aia.org. User Notes: (1148409197) DocuSign Envelope ID:EE15F568-OA07-4EC9-B10E-017579E19BB9 § 6.5 If the Construction Manager's estimate of the Cost of the Work at the conclusion of the Design Development Phase exceeds the Owner's budget for the Cost of the Work,the Owner shall .1 give written approval of an increase in the budget for the Cost of the Work; ,2 terminate in accordance with Section 9.5; .3 in consultation with the Architect and Construction Manager,revise the Project program,scope,or quality as required to reduce the Cost of the Work;or .4 implement any other mutually acceptable alternative. § 6.6 If the Owner chooses to proceed under Section 6.5.3,the Architect,without additional compensation,shall incorporate the revisions in the Construction Documents Phase as necessary to comply with the Owner's budget for the Cost of the Work at the conclusion of the Design Development Phase Services,or the budget as adjusted under Section 6.5.1.The Architect's revisions in the Construction Documents Phase shall be the limit of the Architect's responsibility under this Article 6. § 6.7 After incorporation of modifications under Section 6.6,the Architect shall,as an Additional Service,make any required revisions to the Drawings,Specifications or other documents necessitated by subsequent cost estimates that exceed the Owner's budget for the Cost of the Work,except when the excess is due to changes initiated by the Architect in scope,basic systems,or the kinds and quality of materials,finishes or equipment. ARTICLE 7 COPYRIGHTS AND LICENSES § 7.1 The Architect and the Owner warrant that in transmitting Instruments of Service,or any other information,the transmitting party is the copyright owner of such information or has permission from the copyright owner to transmit such information for its use on the Project. § 7.2 The Architect and the Architect's consultants shall be deemed the authors and owners of their respective Instruments of Service,including the Drawings and Specifications,and shall retain all common law,statutory and other reserved rights,including copyrights.Submission or distribution of Instruments of Service to meet official regulatory requirements or for similar purposes in connection with the Project is not to be construed as publication in derogation of the reserved rights of the Architect and the Architect's consultants. § 7.3 The Architect grants to the Owner a nonexclusive license to use the Architect's Instruments of Service solely and exclusively for purposes of constructing,using,maintaining,altering and adding to the Project,provided that the Owner substantially performs its obligations under this Agreement,including prompt payment of all sums due pursuant to Article 9 and Article 11.The Architect shall obtain similar nonexclusive licenses from the Architect's consultants consistent with this Agreement.The license granted under this section permits the Owner to authorize the Contractors,Construction Manager,Subcontractors,Sub-subcontractors,and suppliers,as well as the Owner's consultants and Separate Contractors,to reproduce applicable portions of the Instruments of Service,subject to any protocols established pursuant to Section 1.3,solely and exclusively for use in performing services or construction for the Project.If the Architect rightfully terminates this Agreement for cause as provided in Section 9.4,the license granted in this Section 7.3 shall terminate. § 7.3.1 In the event the Owner uses the Instruments of Service without retaining the authors of the Instruments of Service,the Owner releases the Architect and Architect's consultant(s)from all claims and causes of action arising from such uses.The Owner,to the extent permitted by law,further agrees to indemnify and hold harmless the Architect and its consultants from all costs and expenses,including the cost of defense,related to claims and causes of action asserted by any third person or entity to the extent such costs and expenses arise from the Owner's use of the Instruments of Service under this Section 7.3.1.The terms of this Section 7.3.1 shall not apply if the Owner rightfully terminates this Agreement for cause under Section 9.4. § 7.4 Except for the licenses granted in this Article 7,no other license or right shall be deemed granted or implied under this Agreement.The Owner shall not assign,delegate,sublicense,pledge or otherwise transfer any license granted herein to another party without the prior written agreement of the Architect.Any unauthorized use of the Instruments of Service shall be at the Owner's sole risk and without liability to the Architect and the Architect's consultants. § 7.5 Except as otherwise stated in Section 7.3,the provisions of this Article 7 shall survive the termination of this Agreement. Init. AIA Document B132- _2019.Copyright m 1992,2009,and 2019 by The American Institute of Architects.All rights reserved.The"American Institute of Architects,""AIA,'the AIA Logo,and"AIA Contract Documents'are registered trademarks and may not be used without permission.This document was produced 8 by AIA software at 16:44:29 ET on 03/17/2022 under Order No.7357118434 which expires on 08/21/2022,is not for resale,is licensed for one-time use only,and may only be used in accordance with the AIA Contract Documents®Terms of Service.To report copyright violations,e-mail copyright@aia.org. User Notes: (1148409197) DocuSign Envelope ID:EE15F568-OA074EC9-B10E-017579E19BB9 ARTICLE 8 CLAIMS AND DISPUTES § 8.1 General § 8.1.1 The Owner and Architect shall commence all claims and causes of action against the other and arising out of or related to this Agreement,whether in contract,tort,or otherwise,in accordance with the requirements of the binding dispute resolution method selected in this Agreement and within the period specified by applicable law.The Owner and Architect waive all claims and causes of action not commenced in accordance with this Section 8.1.1. § 8.1.2 To the extent damages are covered by property insurance,the Owner and Architect waive all rights against each other and against the contractors,consultants,agents and employees of the other for damages,except such rights as they may have to the proceeds of such insurance as set forth in AIA Document A232-2019,General Conditions of the Contract for Construction.The Owner or the Architect,as appropriate,shall require of the Construction Manager, contractors,consultants,agents and employees of any of them,similar waivers in favor of the other parties enumerated herein. § 8.1.3 Intentionally omitted—See Sec. 12.014 for Indemnification Obligations. § 8.1.4 The Architect and Owner waive consequential damages for claims,disputes or other matters in question arising out of or relating to this Agreement.This mutual waiver is applicable,without limitation,to all consequential damages due to either parry's termination of this Agreement,except as specifically provided in Section 9.7. § 8.2 Mediation § 8.2.1 Any claim,dispute,or other matter in question arising out of or related to this Agreement shall be subject to mediation as a condition precedent to binding dispute resolution.If such matter relates to or is the subject of a lien arising out of the Architect's services,the Architect may proceed in accordance with applicable law to comply with the lien notice or filing deadlines prior to resolution of the matter by mediation or by binding dispute resolution. § 8.2.2 The Owner and Architect shall endeavor to resolve claims,disputes and other matters in question between them by mediation,which,unless the parties mutually agree otherwise,shall be administered by the American Arbitration Association in accordance with its Construction Industry Mediation Procedures in effect on the date of this Agreement.A request for mediation shall be made in writing,delivered to the other party to this Agreement,and filed with the person or entity administering the mediation.The request may be made concurrently with the filing of a complaint or other appropriate demand for binding dispute resolution but,in such event,mediation shall proceed in advance of binding dispute resolution proceedings,which shall be stayed pending mediation for a period of 60 days from the date of filing,unless stayed for a longer period by agreement of the parties or court order.If an arbitration proceeding is stayed pursuant to this section,the parties may nonetheless proceed to the selection of the arbitrator(s) and agree upon a schedule for later proceedings. § 8.2.3 The parties shall share the mediator's fee and any filing fees equally.The mediation shall be held in the place where the Project is located,unless another location is mutually agreed upon.Agreements reached in mediation shall be enforceable as settlement agreements in any court having jurisdiction thereof. § 8.2.4 If the parties do not resolve a dispute through mediation pursuant to this Section 8.2,the method of binding dispute resolution shall be the following: (Check the appropriate box.) [ ] Arbitration pursuant to Section 8.3 of this Agreement [X ] Litigation in a court of competent jurisdiction [ ] Other: (Spec) If the Owner and Architect do not select a method of binding dispute resolution,or do not subsequently agree in writing to a binding dispute resolution method other than litigation,the dispute will be resolved in a court of competent jurisdiction. Init. AIA Document B132- _2019.Copyright®1992,2009,and 2019 by The American Institute of Architects.All rights reserved.The"American Institute of Architects,'"AIA,'the AIA Logo,and'AIA Contract Documents'are registered trademarks and may not be used without permission.This document was produced 19 by AIA software at 16:44:29 ET on 03/17/2022 under Order No.7357118434 which expires on 08/21/2022,is not for resale,is licensed for one-time use only,and t may only be used in accordance with the AIA Contract Documents®Terms of Service.To report copyright violations,e-mail copyright@aia.org. User Notes: (1148409197) DocuSign Envelope ID:EE1 5F568-0A07-4EC9-B1 OE-01 7579E1 9B139 § 8.3 Arbitration § 8.3.1 If the parties have selected arbitration as the method for binding dispute resolution in this Agreement any claim,dispute or other matter in question arising out of or related to this Agreement subject to,but not resolved by, mediation shall be subject to arbitration,which,unless the parties mutually agree otherwise,shall be administered by .the American Arbitration Association in accordance with its Construction Industry Arbitration Rules in effect on the date of this Agreement.A demand for arbitration shall be made in writing,delivered to the other party to this Agreement,and filed with the person or entity administering the arbitration. § 8.3.1.1 A demand for arbitration shall be made no earlier than concurrently with the filing of a request for mediation, but in no event shall it be made after the date when the institution of legal or equitable proceedings based on the claim, dispute or other matter in question would be barred by the applicable statute of limitations.For statute of limitations purposes,receipt of a written demand for arbitration by the person or entity administering the arbitration shall constitute the institution of legal or equitable proceedings based on the claim,dispute or other matter in question. § 8.3.2 The foregoing agreement to arbitrate,and other agreements to arbitrate with an additional person or entity duly consented to by parties to this Agreement,shall be specifically enforceable in accordance with applicable law in any court having jurisdiction thereof. §'8.3.3 The award rendered by the arbitrator(s)shall be final,and judgment may be entered upon it in accordance with applicable law in any court having jurisdiction thereof. § 8.3.4 Consolidation or Joinder § 8.3.4.1 Either party,at its sole discretion,may consolidate an arbitration conducted under this Agreement with any other arbitration to which it is a party provided that(1)the arbitration agreement governing the other arbitration permits consolidation,(2)the arbitrations to be consolidated substantially involve common issues of law or fact,and (3)the arbitrations employ materially similar procedural rules and methods for selecting arbitrator(s). § 8.3.4.2 Either party,at its sole discretion,may include by joinder persons or entities substantially involved in a common question of law or fact whose presence is required if complete relief is to be accorded in arbitration,provided that the party sought to be joined consents in writing to such joinder.Consent to arbitration involving an additional person or entity shall not constitute consent to arbitration of any claim,dispute or other matter in question not described in the written consent. § 8.3.4.3 The Owner and Architect grant to any person or entity made a party to an arbitration conducted under this Section 8.3,whether by joinder or consolidation,the same rights of joinder and consolidation as the Owner and Architect under this Agreement. § 8.4 The provisions of this Article 8 shall survive the termination of this Agreement. ARTICLE 9 TERMINATION OR SUSPENSION § 9.1 If the Owner fails to make payments to the Architect in accordance with this Agreement,such failure shall be considered substantial nonperformance and cause for termination or,at the Architect's option,cause for suspension of performance of services under this Agreement.If the Architect elects to suspend services,the Architect shall give seven days'written notice to the Owner before suspending services.In the event of a suspension of services,the Architect shall have no liability to the Owner for delay or damage caused the Owner because of such suspension of services.Before resuming services,the Owner shall pay the Architect all sums due prior to suspension and any expenses incurred in the interruption and resumption of the Architect's services.The Architect's fees for the remaining services and the time schedules shall be equitably adjusted. § 9.2 If the Owner suspends the Project,the Architect shall be compensated for services performed prior to notice of such suspension.When the Project is resumed,the Architect shall be compensated for expenses incurred in the interruption and resumption of the Architect's services.The Architect's fees for the remaining services and the time schedules shall be equitably adjusted. § 9.3 If the Owner suspends the Project for more than 90 cumulative days for reasons other than the fault of the Architect,the Architect may terminate this Agreement by giving not less than seven days'written notice. Init. AIA Document B132" -2019.Copyright m 1992,2009,and 2019 by The American Institute of Architects.All rights reserved.The'American Institute of Architects,""AIA,"the AIA Logo,and"AIA Contract Documents"are registered trademarks and may not be used without permission.This document was produced 20 by AIA software at 16:44:29 ET on 03/17/2022 under Order No.7357118434 which expires on 08/2112022,is not for resale,is licensed for one-time use only,and may only be used in accordance with the AIA Contract Documents®Terms of Service.To report copyright violations,e-mail copyright@aia.org. User Notes: (1148409197) DocuSign Envelope ID:EE1 5F568-0A07-4EC9-B1 OE-01 7579E1 9BB9 § 9.4 Either party may terminate this Agreement upon not less than seven days'written notice should the other party fail substantially to perform in accordance with the terms of this Agreement through no fault of the party initiating the termination. § 9.5 The Owner may terminate this Agreement upon not less than seven days'written notice to the Architect for the Owner's convenience and without cause. § 9.6 If the Owner terminates this Agreement for its convenience pursuant to Section 9.5,or if the Architect terminates this Agreement pursuant to Section 9.3,the Owner shall compensate the Architect for services performed prior to termination,Reimbursable Expenses incurred,and costs attributable to termination,including the costs attributable to the Architect's termination of consultant agreements. § 9.7 In addition to any amounts paid under Section 9.6,if the Owner terminates this Agreement for its convenience pursuant to Section 9.5,or the Architect terminates this Agreement pursuant to Section 9.3,the Owner shall pay to the Architect the following fees: (Set forth below the amount of any termination or licensing fee, or the method for determining any termination or licensing fee) .1 Termination Fee: N/A .2 Licensing Fee if the Owner intends to continue using the Architect's Instruments of Service: N/A § 9.8 Except as otherwise expressly provided herein,this Agreement shall terminate one year from the date of Substantial Completion. § 9.9 The Owner's rights to use the Architect's Instruments of Service in the event of a termination of this Agreement are set forth in Article 7 and Section 9.7. ARTICLE 10 MISCELLANEOUS PROVISIONS § 10.1 This Agreement shall be governed by the law of the place where the Project is located,excluding that jurisdiction's choice of law rules.If the parties have selected arbitration as the method of binding dispute resolution,the Federal Arbitration Act shall govern Section 8.3. § 10.2 Terms in this Agreement shall have the same meaning as those in AIA Document A232-2019,General Conditions of the Contract for Construction,Construction Manager as Adviser Edition,except for purposes of this Agreement,the term"Work"shall include the work of all Contractors under the administration of the Architect and Construction Manager. § 10.3 The Owner and Architect,respectively,bind themselves,their agents,successors,assigns,and legal representatives to this Agreement.Neither the Owner nor the Architect shall assign this Agreement without the written consent of the other,except that the Owner may assign this Agreement to a lender providing financing for the Project if the lender agrees to assume the Owner's rights and obligations under this Agreement,and including any payments due to the Architect by the Owner prior to the assignment. § 10.4 If the Owner requests the Architect to execute certificates,the proposed language of such certificates shall be submitted to the Architect for review at least 14 days prior to the requested dates of execution.If the Owner requests the Architect to execute consents reasonably required to facilitate assignment to a lender,the Architect shall execute all such consents that are consistent with this Agreement,provided the proposed consent is submitted to the Architect for review at least 14 days prior to execution.The Architect shall not be required to execute certificates or consents that would require knowledge,services,or responsibilities beyond the scope of this Agreement. Init AIA Document B132" -2019.Copyright m 1992,2009,and 2019 by The American Institute of Architects.All rights reserved.The"American Institute of Architects,'"AIA,"the AIA Logo,and"AIA Contract Documents"are registered trademarks and may not be used without permission.This document was produced 21 by AIA software at 16:44:29 ET on 03/17/2022 under Order No.7357118434 which expires on 08/21/2022,is not for resale,is licensed for one-time use only,and t may only be used in accordance with the AIA Contract Documentss Terms of Service.To report copyright violations,e-mail copyright@aia.org. User Notes: (1148409197) DocuSign Envelope ID:EE15F568-0A07-4EC9-610E-017579E191369 § 10.5 Nothing contained in this Agreement shall create a contractual relationship with,or a cause of action in favor of,a third party against either the Owner or Architect. § 10.6 Unless otherwise required in this Agreement,the Architect shall have no responsibility for the discovery, presence,handling,removal or disposal of,or exposure of persons to,hazardous materials or toxic substances in any form at the Project site. § 10.7 The Architect shall have the right to include photographic or artistic representations of the design of the Project among the Architect's promotional and professional materials.The Architect shall be given reasonable access to the completed Project to make such representations.However,the Architect's materials shall not include the Owner's confidential or proprietary information if the Owner has previously advised the Architect in writing of the specific information considered by the Owner to be confidential or proprietary.The Owner shall provide professional credit for the Architect in the Owner's promotional materials for the Project.This Section 10.7 shall survive the termination of this Agreement unless the Owner terminates this Agreement for cause pursuant to Section 9.4. § 10.8 If the Architect or Owner receives information specifically designated as"confidential"or"business proprietary,"the receiving party shall keep such information strictly confidential and shall not disclose it to any other person except as set forth in Section 10.8.1.This Section 10.8 shall survive the termination of this Agreement. § 10.8.1 The receiving party may disclose"confidential'or"business proprietary" information after 7 days'notice to the other party,when required by law,arbitrator's order,or court order,including a subpoena or other form of compulsory legal process issued by a court or governmental entity,or to the extent such information is reasonably necessary for the receiving party to defend itself in any dispute.The receiving party may also disclose such information to its employees,consultants,or contractors in order to perform services or work solely and exclusively for the Project,provided those employees,consultants and contractors are subject to the restrictions on the disclosure and use of such information as set forth in this Section 10.8. § 10.9 The invalidity,of any provision of the Agreement shall not invalidate the Agreement or its remaining provisions.If it is determined that any provision of the Agreement violates any law,or is otherwise invalid or unenforceable;then that provision shall be revised to the extent necessary to make that provision legal and enforceable.In such case the Agreement shall be construed,to the fullest extent permitted by law,to give effect to the parties' intentions and purposes in executing the Agreement. ARTICLE 11 COMPENSATION § 11.1 For the Architect's Basic Services described under Article 3,the Owner shall compensate the Architect as follows: .1 Other (Describe the method of compensation) The initial contract includes: Part 1:Conceptual/Schematic Design Part 2:Support for the Land Use Application and review process Part 3:Design Development Part 4:Approval Documents-recordation support Part 5:Construction Documents Progress billing,not to exceed phases 1-5,as described in attached Exhibit C Updated Fee Schedule provided the Owner notify the Architect of the selected option for each phase prior to the commencement of work. If,at the conclusion of"Part 1 Conceptual/Schematic Design"the scope of the project varies from that as described in Exhibit A by greater than 10%,the parties reserve the right to review and revise compensation total as stated above. Additional portions of work may be added as the project moves forward,by amendment: (Paragraph deleted) Part 6:Supporting the Building Permit Application Process Part 7:Construction Administration Init. AIA Document B132" -2019.Copyright®1992,2009,and 2019 by The American Institute of Architects.All rights reserved.The"American Institute of Architects,""AIA,"the AIA Logo,and"AIA Contract Documents"are registered trademarks and may not be used without permission.This document was produced 22 by AIA software at 16:44:29 ET on 03/17/2022 under Order No.7357118434 which expires on 08/21/2022,is not for resale,is licensed for one-time use only,and t may only be used in accordance with the AIA Contract Documents®Terms of Service.To report copyright violations,e-mail copydght@aia.org. User Notes: (1148409197) DocuSign Envelope ID:EE15F568-OA07-4EC9-B10E-017579E19BB9 Part 8:Project Closeout and Warranty Support As described in attached Exhibit A Land and Shelter,Inc.Proposal dated December 14,2021,and Exhibit B City of Aspen Request for Proposals 2021-239 Architecture&Engineering Design Team for the"Burlingame Childcare Center"dated October 22,2021. § 11.2 For the Architect's Supplemental Services designated in Section 4.1.1 and for any Sustainability Services required pursuant to Section 4.1.3,the Owner shall compensate the Architect as follows: (Insert amount of, or basis for, compensation.If necessary, list specific services to which particular methods of compensation apply.) Additional services may be added by written amendment § 11.3 For Additional Services that may arise during the course of the Project,including those under Section 4.2,the Owner shall compensate the Architect as follows: (Insert amount of, or basis for, compensation) Additional services may be added by written amendment § 11.4 Compensation for Supplemental and Additional Services of the Architect's consultants when not included in Sections 11.2 or 11.3,shall be the amount invoiced to the Architect plus five percent(5 %),or as follows: (Insert amount of, or basis for computing,Architect's consultants'compensation for Supplemental or Additional Services.) Refer to Updated Fee Schedule Exhibit C § 11.5 When compensation for Basic Services is based on a stipulated sum or a percentage basis,the proportion of compensation for each phase of services shall be as follows: (Table deleted) Refer to Updated Fee Schedule Exhibit C for additional detail. The Owner acknowledges that with an accelerated Project delivery or multiple bid package process,the Architect may be providing its services in multiple Phases simultaneously.Therefore,the Architect shall be permitted to invoice monthly in proportion to services performed in each Phase of Services,as appropriate. § 11.6 When compensation identified in Section 11.1 is on a percentage basis,progress payments for each phase of Basic Services shall be calculated by multiplying the percentages identified in this Article by the Owner's most recent budget for the Cost of the Work.Compensation paid in previous progress payments shall not be adjusted based on subsequent updates to the Owner's budget for the Cost of the Work. § 11.6.1 When compensation is on a percentage basis and any portions of the Project are deleted or otherwise not constructed,compensation for those portions of the Project shall be payable to the extent services are performed on those portions.The Architect shall be entitled to compensation in accordance with this Agreement for all services performed whether or not the Construction Phase is commenced. § 11.7 The hourly billing rates for services of the Architect and the Architect's consultants are set forth below.The rates shall be adjusted in accordance with the Architect's and Architect's consultants'normal review practices. (If applicable, attach an exhibit of hourly billing rates or insert them below.) Refer to schedule of rates in attached Exhibit C Updated Fee Schedule (Table deleted) Init AIA Document B132• -2019.Copyright m 1992,2009,and 2019 by The American Institute of Architects.All rights reserved.The"American Institute of Architects,""AIA,'the AIA Logo,and"AIA Contract Documents"are registered trademarks and may not be used without permission.This document was produced 23 by AIA software at 16:44:29 ET on 03/17/2022 under Order No.7357118434 which expires on 08/21/2022,is not for resale,is licensed for one-time use only,and t may only be used in accordance with the AIA Contract Documents®Terms of Service.To report copyright violations,e-mail copyright@aia.org. User Notes: (1148409197) DocuSign Envelope ID:EE15F568-OA07-4EC9-B10E-017579E19BB9 § 11.8 Compensation for Reimbursable Expenses § 11.8.1 Reimbursable Expenses are in addition to compensation for Basic,Supplemental,and Additional Services and include expenses incurred by the Architect and the Architect's consultants directly related to the Project,as follows: .1 Transportation and authorized out-of-town travel and subsistence; .2 Long distance services,dedicated data and communication services,teleconferences,Project web sites, and extranets; .3 Permitting and other fees required by authorities having jurisdiction over the Project; .4 Printing,reproductions,plots,and standard form documents; .5 Postage,handling,and delivery; .6 Expense of overtime work requiring higher than regular rates,if authorized in advance by the Owner; .7, Renderings,physical models,mock-ups,professional photography,and presentation materials requested by the Owner or required for the Project; .8 If required by the Owner,and with the Owner's prior written approval,the Architect's consultants' expenses of professional liability insurance dedicated exclusively to this Project,or the expense of additional insurance coverage or limits in excess of that normally maintained by the Architect's consultants; .9 All taxes levied on professional services and on reimbursable expenses; .10 Site office expenses; .11 Registration fees and any other fees charged by the Certifying Authority or by other entities as necessary to achieve the Sustainable Objective;and .12 Other similar Project-related expenditures. § 11.8.2 For Reimbursable Expenses the compensation shall be the expenses incurred by the Architect and the Architect's consultants as outlined in Exhibit C,Updated Fee Schedule. § 11.9 Architect's Insurance If the types and limits of coverage required in Section 2.6 are in addition to the types and limits the Architect normally maintains,the Owner shall pay the Architect for the additional costs incurred by the Architect for the additional coverages as set forth below: (Insert the additional coverages the Architect is required to obtain in order to satisfy the requirements set forth in Section 2.6, and for which the Owner shall reimburse the Architect.) § 11.10 Payments to the Architect § 11.10.1 Initial Payments § 11.10.1.1 An initial payment of ($ )shall be made upon execution of this Agreement and is the minimum payment under this Agreement.It shall be credited to the Owner's account in the final invoice. § I1.10.1.2 If a Sustainability Certification is part of the Sustainable Objective,an initial payment to the Architect of ($ )shall be made upon execution of this Agreement for registration fees and other fees payable to the Certifying Authority and necessary to achieve the Sustainability Certification.The Architect's payments to the Certifying Authority shall be credited to the Owner's account at the time the expense is incurred. § 11.10.2 Progress Payments § 11.10.2.1 Unless otherwise agreed,payments for services shall be made monthly in proportion to services performed.Payments are due and payable upon presentation of the Architect's invoice.Amounts unpaid forty five days ( 45 )days after the invoice date shall bear interest at the rate entered below,or in the absence thereof at the legal rate prevailing from time to time at the principal place of business of the Architect. (Insert rate of monthly or annual interest agreed upon.) 3.25 % § 11.10.2.2 The Owner shall not withhold amounts from the Architect's compensation to impose a penalty or liquidated damages on the Architect,or to offset sums requested by or paid to Contractors for the cost of changes in the Work,unless the Architect agrees or has been found liable for the amounts in a binding dispute resolution proceeding. Init. AIA Document B132- -2019.Copyright m 1992.2009,and 2019 by The American Institute of Architects.All rights reserved.The'American Institute of Architects,""AIA,'the AIA Logo,and'AIA Contract Documents"are registered trademarks and may not be used without permission.This document was produced 24 by AIA software at 16:44:29 ET on 03/17/2022 under Order No.7357118434 which expires on 08/21/2022,is not for resale,is licensed for one-time use only,and t may only be used in accordance with the AIA Contract Documents®Terms of Service.To report copyright violations,e-mail copyright@aia.org. User Notes: (1148409197) DocuSign Envelope ID:EE15F568-OA07-4EC9-B10E-017579E19BB9 § 11.10.2.3 Records of Reimbursable Expenses,expenses pertaining to Supplemental and Additional Services,and services performed on the basis of hourly rates shall be available to the Owner at mutually convenient times. ARTICLE 12 SPECIAL TERMS AND CONDITIONS Special terms and conditions that modify this Agreement are as follows: (Include other terms and conditions applicable to this Agreement.) §12.5 Tax-Exemption. All purchases of supplies,construction or building materials shall not include Federal Excise Taxes or Colorado State or local sales or use taxes. The Owner's State of Colorado tax identification number is 98-04557. The Owner's Federal Tax Identification Number is 84-6000563. §12.6 Independent Contractor Status. It is expressly acknowledged and understood by the parties that nothing contained in this agreement shall result in or be construed as establishing an employment relationship. Architect shall be,and shall perform as,an Independent Contractor who agrees to use his or her best efforts to provide the said services on behalf of the Owner. No agent,employee,or servant of Architect shall be,or shall be deemed to be,the employee,agent or servant of the Owner. Owner is interested only in the results obtained under this contract. The manner and means of conducting the work are under the sole control of Architect. None of the benefits provided by Owner to its employees including,but not limited to,workers'compensation insurance and unemployment insurance, are available from Owner to the employees,agents or servants of Architect. Architect shall be solely and entirely responsible for its acts and for the acts of Architect's agents,employees,servants and consultants during the performance of this contract. Architect shall indemnify Owner against all liability and loss in connection with,and shall assume full responsibility for payment of all federal,state and local taxes or contributions imposed or required under unemployment insurance,social security and income tax law,with respect to Architect and/or Architect's employees engaged in the performance of the services agreed to herein. §12.7 Notice. Any written notices as called for herein may be hand delivered to the respective persons and/or addresses listed below or mailed by certified mail return receipt requested,to: Owner: City Manager City of Aspen 427 Rio Grande Place Aspen,Colorado 81611 With a copy to: James R.True,Esq. City Attorney 427 Rio Grande Place Aspen,Colorado 81611 § 12.8 Non-Discrimination. No discrimination because of race,color,creed,sex,marital status,affectional or sexual orientation,family responsibility,national origin,ancestry,handicap,or religion shall be made in the employment of persons to perform services under this contract. Architect agrees to meet all of the requirements of Owner's municipal code,Section 13-98,pertaining to non-discrimination in employment. § 12.9 Waiver. The waiver by the Owner of any term,covenant,or condition hereof shall not operate as a waiver of any subsequent breach of the same or any other term. No term,covenant,or condition of this Agreement can be waived except by the written consent of the Owner. Forbearance or indulgence by the Owner in any regard whatsoever shall not constitute a waiver of any term,covenant,or condition to be performed by Architect to which the same may apply and,until complete performance by Architect of said term,covenant or condition,the Owner shall be entitled to invoke any remedy available to it under this Agreement or by law despite any such forbearance or indulgence. § 12.10 Execution of Agreement by Owner. This agreement shall be binding upon all parties hereto and their respective heirs,executors,administrators,successors and assigns. Notwithstanding anything to the contrary contained herein, Init. AIA Document B132- -2019.Copyright m 1992,2009,and 2019 by The American Institute of Architects.All rights reserved.The"American Institute of Architects,-"AIA,-the AIA Logo,and"AIA Contract Documents'are registered trademarks and may not be used without permission.This document was produced 25 by AIA software at 16:44:29 ET on 03/17/2022 under Order No.7357118434 which expires on 08/21/2022,is not for resale,is licensed for one-time use only,and t may only be used in accordance with the AIA Contract Documents®Terms of Service.To report copyright violations,e-mail copyright@aia.org. User Notes: (1148409197) DocuSign Envelope ID:EE15F568-OA07-4EC9-B10E-017579E19BB9 this Agreement shall not be binding upon the Owner unless duly executed in accordance with the requirements of the Owner's municipal code by the Mayor of the City of Aspen,or a duly authorized official in his absence,following approval of City Council. §12.11 Worker Without Authorization prohibited—CRS§8-17.5-101 &§24-76.5-101 §12.11.1 Purpose. During the 2021 Colorado legislative session,the legislature passed House Bill 21-1075 that amended current CRS§8-17.5-102(1),(2)(a),(2)(b)introductory portion,and(2)(b)(III)as it relates to the employment of and contracting with a"worker without authorization"which is defined as an individual who is unable to provide evidence that the individual is authorized by the federal government to work in the United States. As amended,the current law prohibits all state agencies and political subdivisions,including the Owner,from knowingly hiring a worker without authorization to perform work under a contract,or to knowingly contract with a Consultant who knowingly hires with a worker without authorization to perform work under the contract. The law also requires that all contracts for services include certain specific language as set forth in the statutes.The following terms and conditions have been designed to comply with the requirements of this new law. §12.11.2 Definitions. The following terms are defined by this reference are incorporated herein and in any contract for services entered into with the Owner. 1."E-verify program"means the electronic employment verification program created in Public Law 208, 104th Congress,as amended,and expanded in Public Law 156, 108th Congress,as amended,that is jointly administered by the United States Department of Homeland Security and the social security Administration,or its successor program. 2."Department program"means the employment verification program established pursuant to Section 8-17.5-102(5)(c). 3."Public Contract for Services"means this Agreement. 4."Services"means the furnishing of labor,time,or effort by a Consultant or a subconsultant not involving the delivery of a specific end product other than reports that are merely incidental to the required performance. 5."Worker without authorization"means an individual who is unable to provide evidence that the individual is authorized by the federal government to work in the United States §12.11.3 By signing this document,Consultant certifies and represents that at this time: 1.Consultant shall confirm the employment eligibility of all employees who are newly hired for employment to perform work under the public contract for services;and 2.Consultant has participated or attempted to participate in either the e-verify program or the department program in order to verify that new employees are not workers without authorization. § 12.11.4 Consultant hereby confirms that: 1.Consultant shall not knowingly employ or contract with a worker without authorization to perform work under the Public Contract for Services. 2.Consultant shall not enter into a contract with a subconsultant that fails to certify to the Consultant that the subconsultant shall not knowingly employ or contract with a worker without authorization to perform work under the Public Contract for Services. 3.Consultant has confirmed the employment eligibility of all employees who are newly hired for employment to perform work under the public contract for services through participation in either the e-verify program or the department program. 4.Consultant shall not use the either the e-verify program or the department program procedures to undertake pre-employment screening of job applicants while the Public Contract for Services is being performed. Init AIA Document 13132- -2019.Copyright m 1992,2009,and 2019 by The American Institute of Architects.All rights reserved.The'American Institute of Architects,""AIA,"the AIA Logo,and"AIA Contract Documents"are registered trademarks and may not be used without permission.This document was produced 26 by AIA software at 16:44:29 ET on 03/17/2022 under Order No.7357118434 which expires on 08/21/2022,Is not for resale,is licensed for one-time use only,and may only be used in accordance with the AIA Contract Documents®Terms of Service.To report copyright violations,e-mail copyright@aia.org. User Notes: (1148409197) DocuSign Envelope ID:EE15F568-0A07-4EC9-B1OE-017579EI91369 § 12.11.5 If Consultant obtains actual knowledge that a subconsultant performing work under the Public Contract for Services knowingly employs or contracts with a worker without authorization,Consultant shall: 1.Notify such subconsultant and the Owner within three days that Consultant has actual knowledge that the subconsultant is employing or subcontracting with a worker without authorization:and 2.Terminate the subcontract with the subconsultant if within three days of receiving the notice required pursuant to this section the subconsultant does not stop employing or contracting with the worker without authorization;except that Consultant shall not terminate the Public Contract for Services with the subconsultant if during such three days the subconsultant provides information to establish that the subconsultant has not knowingly employed or contracted with a worker without authorization. §12.11.6 Consultant shall comply with any reasonable request by the Colorado Department of Labor and Employment made in the course of an investigation that the Colorado Department of Labor and Employment undertakes or is undertaking pursuant to the authority established in Subsection 8-17.5-102(5),C.R.S. § 12.11.7 If Consultant violates any provision of the Public Contract for Services pertaining to the duties imposed by Subsection 8-17.5-102,C.R.S.the Owner may terminate this Agreement. If this Agreement is so terminated, Consultant shall be liable for actual damages to the Owner arising out of Consultant's violation of Subsection 8-17.5-102,C.R.S. §12.12 It is agreed that neither this agreement nor any of its terms,provisions,conditions,representations or covenants can be modified,changed,terminated or amended,waived,superseded or extended except by appropriate written instrument fully executed by the parties. § 12.13 If any of the provisions of this agreement shall be held invalid,illegal or unenforceable it shall not affect or impair the validity,legality or enforceability of any other provision. § 12.14 Indemnification Architect agrees to indemnify and hold harmless the City of Aspen,its officers,and employees from and against all liability,claims,and demands,on account of injury,loss,or damage,including without limitation claims arising from bodily injury,personal injury,sickness,disease,death,property loss or damage,or any other loss of any kind whatsoever,but only to the extent and for an amount represented by the degree or percentage of negligence,or fault of the Architect,any subcontractor of the Architect,or any officer,employee,representative,or agent of the Architect or of any subcontractor of the Architect,or which arises out of any workmen's compensation claim of any employee of the Architect or of any employee of any subcontractor of the Architect. The extent of the Architect's obligation to indemnify or hold harmless any indemnity obligee may be determined only after the Architect's liability or fault has been determined by adjudication,alternative dispute resolution,or otherwise resolved by mutual agreement between the Architect and the indemnity obligee.The Architect's duty to indemnify the Owner under this provision shall be limited to the available proceeds of insurance coverage. Nothing contained herein shall be construed or interpreted as denying to either party any remedy or defense available to such party under the laws of the State of Colorado,including the Colorado Governmental Immunity Act.The City of Aspen will indemnify,defend,and hold the Architect and its members,managers,officers,agents,and employees harmless against any claim,demand,damage,injury,cause of action,cost or expense(including but not limited to reasonable attorneys' fees),judgments,or other liability of any nature whatsoever incurred in connection with the negligent or willful acts or omissions of the City of Aspen's officers,employees,or agents in connection with the Project,provided that if the indemnity obligation stated above arises under circumstances in which the Architect also owes a duty to indemnify the City of Aspen under this Section 12.14,the City of Aspen's indemnity shall also be prorated to reflect its percentage of fault in the same manner as Architect's,above to the extent allowed by law. §12.15 Electronic Signatures and Electronic Records This Agreement and any amendments hereto may be executed in several counterparts,each of which shall be deemed an original,and all of which together shall constitute one agreement binding on the Parties,notwithstanding the possible event that all Parties may not have signed the same counterpart. Furthermore,each Party consents to the use of electronic signatures by either Party. The Scope of Work, and any other documents requiring a signature hereunder,may be signed electronically in the manner agreed to by the Init. AIA Document B132' -2019.Copyright m 1992,2009,and 2019 by The American Institute of Architects.All rights reserved.The"American Institute of Architects,''AIA,'the AIA Logo,and"AIA Contract Documents"are registered trademarks and may not be used without permission.This document was produced 27 by AIA software at 16:44:29 ET on 03/17/2022 under Order No.7357118434 which expires on 08/21/2022,is not for resale,is licensed for one-time use only,and may only be used in accordance with the AIA Contract Documents®Terms of Service.To report copyright violations,e-mail copyright@aia.org. User Notes: (1148409197) DocuSign Envelope ID:EE15F568-OA07-4EC9-B10E-017579E19BB9 Parties. The Parties agree not to deny the legal effect or enforceability of the Agreement solely because it is in . electronic form or because an electronic record was used in its formation. The Parties agree not to object to the admissibility of the Agreement in the form of an electronic record,or a paper copy of an electronic documents,or a paper copy of a document bearing an electronic signature,on the grounds that it is an electronic record or electronic signature or that it is not in its original form or is not an original. ARTICLE.13 SCOPE OF THE AGREEMENT § 13.1 This Agreement represents the entire and integrated agreement between the Owner and the Architect and supersedes all prior negotiations,representations or agreements,either written or oral.This Agreement may be amended only by written instrument signed by both the Owner and Architect. § 13.2 This Agreement is comprised of the following documents identified below: .1 AIA Document B 132Tm-2019,Standard Form Agreement Between Owner and Architect,Construction Manager as Adviser Edition (Paragraphs deleted) ,2 Exhibit A Land and Shelter,Inc.Proposal dated December 14,2021 (Paragraphs deleted) .3 Exhibit B City of Aspen Request for Proposals 2021-239 Architecture&Engineering Design Team for the'Burlingame Childcare Center"dated October 22.2021. .4 Exhibit C Updated Fee Schedule (Paragraphs deleted) �t is entered into as of the day and year first written above. E-1-711EDOAM bM Sin. G. !� ... 0 (Signature) ARCHITECT(Signature) Sara G. Ott City Manager Andrea Korber Owner/Principal , Land+Shelter, Inc. (Printed name and title) (Printed name, title, and license number, if 3/28/2022 4:05:18 PM PDT applicable) Init. AIA Document B132" _2019.Copyright C 1992,2009,and 2019 by The American Institute of Architects.All rights reserved.The"American Institute of Architects,""AIA,"the AIA Logo,and"AIA Contract Documents"are registered trademarks and may not be used without permission.This document was produced 28 by AIA software at 16:44:29 ET on 03/17/2022 under Order No.7357118434 which expires on 08/2112022,Is not for resale,is licensed for one-time use only,and t may only be used in accordance with the AIA Contract Documents®Terms of Service.To report copyright violations,e-mail copyright@ala.org. User Notes: (1148409197) t=Xrllt)lt A CITY OF ASPEN - BURLINGAME CHILDCARE CENTER PROJECT #2021-239 DECEMBER 14, 2021 jL4 C-4 I � Lard+Shelter a an'-', ARCHITECTURE AND PLANNING ARCHITECTS PLANNNG 0 DESIGN 9 December 14, 2021 City of Aspen 130 South Galena Street Aspen, CO 81611 RE: Request for Proposals Project #2021-239 Architecture & Engineering Design Team for the Burlingame Childcare Center Dear Selection Committee: We are pleased to present a team that combines local knowledge, national early childhood design expertise, and a track record of successful teamwork. AFA&RDG frequently team on early learning research, as well as early childhood centers, and L+S adds a local record architect to that subject matter expertise. The AFA/RDG work allocation splits services into core and shell and sustainability (AFA) and interiors (RDG) following the strengths of the two firms. L+S will add the deep community roots needed to support the type of outreach demanded by Aspen and Burlingame in particular. We have put together the A team of local consultants to ensure a smooth land use and permitting process, including veterans: Sopris Engineering, DHM, Project Resource Studio, and Evolve - all frequent collaborators with Land+Shelter. This is the best team for a critical community project. A quality early childhood learning experience is an investment in our collective future. Alan Ford Architects has completed multiple, award -winning early childhood education centers. AFA co- founded the Early Childhood Education Design Conference, the only annual conference dedicated to best practices in the design of early learning environments for children ages six weeks to five years. Alan also published Designing the Sustainable School and A Sense of Entry, Designing the Welcoming School. RDG is recognized as a national leader in the design of early childhood environments having assisted over 50 organizations and communities across the U.S. in the development of their centers. Their team is dedicated to raising the bar for early education programs and design that support these programs. RDG strives to continually learn from their partners and experiences, paying forward the knowledge gained through planning, design, construction, research, and operations of high -quality environments for children, parents, and their communities. Land+Shelter is the go -to local firm for projects with complex community outreach and capitol campaigns. Nonprofits, schools, and municipalities have all sought L+S for our expertise navigating their difficult project goals. We work in partnership with these clients to bring together disparate stakeholders through challenging fundraising campaigns. Over the years, L+S has proudly hosted community input events, site walks, and drop -in table sessions. We're excited to engage this fundamental community project. L+S/AFA/RDG brings together the experience, passion, and know-how to facilitate meaningful conversations and create a project that demonstrates the best of what early childhood education can be - engaging, sustainable, and community -connected. We would genuinely appreciate the opportunity to partner with you in the creation of this essential community need. Sincerely, Andrea Korber AIA LEED AP Principal/Owner Land+Shelter, Inc. 16 N 4th Street Carbondale, CO 81623 t 970.963.0201 andi@landandshelter.com Alan Ford, FAIA, MILE, NCARB Edward M. Buglewicz, AIA Principal, Alan Ford Architects Partner, RDG Planning & Design 3457 Ringsby Court, #217 1302 Howard Street Denver, Colorado 80216 Omaha, NE 68102 t 303.383.1 111 t 402.392.0133 aford@fordarch.com ebuglewicz@rdgusa.com City of Aspen #2021-239 - Burlingame Childcare Center Land+Shelteralas 'r-1rrl+ R,Dg•ARCHITECTURE AND PLANIJIW5 ARCHITECTS-ANNING N Cover Letter PAGE 02 TAB 5.1 QUALIFICATIONS 5.1.A Overview of the Firm/Team PAGE 05 5.1.13 Relevant Team Experience PAGE 14 5.1.0 Design Capabilities PAGE 18 5.1.D In -House Personnel Dedicated to the Project PAGE 20 5.1.E Consultants/Engineers PAGE 32 TAB 5.2 PROPOSAL ELEMENTS 5.2.A Acknowledgment of Scope of Services PAGE 38 5.2.13 Fee Worksheet PAGE 41 5.2.0 Detailed Schedule PAGE 43 5.2.D Design Process Coordination/ Quality Control PAGE 46 5.2.E Additional Requirements PAGE 48 APPENDIX Detailed Project Sheets PAGE 52 Land+Shelter alanford . n _i+�.r •.n. ... �. �. ..�....�rv, A ilrl...11Tt-rTC ■ 5.1.A OVERVIEW OF THE FIRM/TEAM On the following pages in this section, please find the qualifications of our Architect of Record, Land+Shelter, via AIA Document B305, Architect's Qualification Statement. Land+Shelter is not in the process of filing or has filed bankruptcy within the last five years or ever in the firm's history. A letter from our firm's financial institutions is located at the end of this proposal section. Our basic structure is AFA as Design Architect and L+S as Record Architect. AFA frequently teams with RDG and they work in tandem on the design, with RDG focusing on interiors and AFA focusing on the core and shell. Our relevant experience suits our roles on this team. Our team represents both specialization in early childcare design and veteran local community design. Perhaps more importantly, each of us is committed to applying that knowledge and experience to finding the right solution for the Burlingame Childcare Center. Throughout our time with you, we guarantee you will always have a consistent point of contact. Our Architect of Record, Andi Korber, is based in Carbondale and ECE Design Principal Alan Ford, based in Denver, will both be readily available to you as needed. As identified in our cover letter, L+S and AFA are partnering with RDG Planning & Design; a national leader in early care and education environments. AFA and RDG have partnered previously on early childhood centers, and they share a common passion to elevate the importance of environments in child care settings and the influence these settings have on our communities' youngest learners. AFA and L+S are working together on a recently awarded project in Basalt. This team's consultants have a long track record of successful collaborations with L+S. L+S and AFA's relationship was established more recently, while AFA and RDG have worked together for more than 8 years on numerous Early Childhood Design conferences. In addition to the conference AFA and RDG collaborated on the design of an early childhood center in Golden. AFA and RDG have 3 current projects active together with AFA as the architect of record. AFA and L+S have one current active project together. Local, experienced consultants Evolve Structural Design, Sopris Engineering, McDowell Engineering, Project Resource Studio, and DHM Design will provide structural, civil and survey, traffic, community outreach, and landscape architecture services respectively. These local consultants will be joined by Denver metro -based firms, BranchPattern for mechanical/electrical/plumbing/technology design, Group14 Engineering for energy/daylight modeling and LEED certification (if needed), and HydroSystems*KDI for irrigation design. Sturm Consulting, with over a decade of experience working with RDG for foodservice and kitchen design of early childhood facilities. City of Aspen #2021-239 - Burlingame Childcare Center We feel that the L+S + AFA + RDG team is uniquely qualified to bring an exceptional high performance facility to your Burlingame Childcare campus for the following reasons: • Andi Korber has provided her architectural skills and knowledge of this region to create sustainable, modern architecture that respects the land and enhances the community for commercial and educational clients. Land+Shelter's extensive portfolio of work with municipalities and non-profit boards is well suited to this project type. Andi has become a go to architect for project work requiring fundraising, with clients that include Town of Carbondale, Town of Basalt, Garfield County, Colorado State Extension, ACES, AVLT, and Colorado Mountain College. • Alan Ford co-founded the Early Childhood Education Design Conference - a conference for facility managers, ECE owners and operators, educators, and designers that focuses on best practices for designing early childhood facilities. This conference brings Early Childhood Education thought leaders from around the world to provide best practices education to design and construction professionals. To date five conferences have been held featuring over 50 thought leaders representing a variety of expertise in how to design for learners 0 to 5. In addition AFA has designed multiple ECE projects applying best practices from their years of research. • Ed Buglewicz has spent nearly two decades working together with his RDG colleagues focused on the programming and design of over three dozen early educational facilities, annually serving over 6,200 children and their families across the United States, ranging from the forests of Maine to the and deserts of Arizona. • Alan Ford Architects and RDG Planning & Design both have received numerous awards and recognition for the design of quality early learning environments. AFA's Mapleton Early Childhood Learning Center was the recipient of nine local and national awards. We believe our combined knowledge and experience of the local community and a specialization on early childcare and education will be an asset to not only provide a high -quality environment to match your program, but will be valuable to achieving your desired programmatic goals. D. Land+Shelter alan'__ -rJ'.. RD.9•• . ..n�.-. rr••n• ...., n. .. .�.w. A rlrI II- --C AIA Document B305T"" - 2021 Architect's Qualification Statement THE PARTIES SHOULD EXECUTE A SEPARATE CONFIDENTIALITY AGREEMENT IF THEY INTEND FOR ANY OF THE INFORMATION IN THIS B305.2021 TO BE HELD CONFIDENTIAL. SUBMITTED TO: (Insert organization name and address) City of Aspen 130 South Galena Street Aspen, CO 81611 PROJECT: (Insert the name and address of the Project.) Burlingame Childcare Center, Project# 2021-239 § 1 FIRM INFORMATION § 1.1 Identify the full legal name of your firm. Land+Shelter, Inc. S-Corp This document has important legal consequences. Consultation with an attorney is encouraged with respect to its completion or modification. § 1.2 Identify the address of your firm's principal place of business and list all office locations out of which your firm conducts business. If your firm has multiple offices, you may attach an exhibit or refer to a website. 16 North 4th Street, Carbondale, CO 81623 § 1.3 Identify the office out of which your firm proposes to perform services for the Project. 16 North 4th Street, Carbondale, CO 81623 § 1.4 Primary contact: (Insert name, title, phone number, and email address) Andrea Korber, Owner/Principal, 970-366-1582, andi@landandshelter.com § 1.5 Firm Website. www.landandshelter.com § 1.6 General Statement of Qualifications. (Briefly describe your firm 's qualifications, such as your design philosophy or firm mission, and how those qualifications apply to the Project. Please limit your response to 200 words or less) We design and collaborate with our clients to create sustainable, modern architecture that respects the land and enhances our community. Land+Shelter provides an integration of architecture, sustainable design, owner's representation, planning services, and community outreach — since 2005. Our mission and skillset is perfectly suited to create a sustainable, community -driven solution to much needed childcare and housing in our valley. § 1.7 Identify the legal status under which your firm does business, such as sole proprietorship, partnership, corporation, joint venture, or other. S-Corp Init. AIA Document B305TM — 2021. Copyright @ 1963, 1979, 1993, and 2021 by The American Institute of Architects. All rights reserved. The "American Institute of Architects," "AIA," the AIA Logo, and "AIA Contract Documents" are registered trademarks and may not be used without permission. This document was created on 12/09/2021 15:09:27 under the terns of AIA Documents on Demand® Order No. 2114269318 , is not for resale, is licensed for one-time f use only, and may only be used in accordance with the AIA Contract Documents® Documents -on -Demand — End User License Agreement. To report copyright violations, email copyright@aia.org. City of Aspen #2021-239 - Burlingame Childcare Center 1 If your firm is a sole proprietorship, identify its owner and date of organization. NA .2 If your firm is a partnership, identify the type, its partners, and its date of organization. NA .3 If your firm is a corporation, identify the type, the state in which it is incorporated, the date of incorporation, and its four highest-ranking corporate officers and their titles, as applicable. S-Corp, Incorporated in Colorado 2005 One partner, Andrea Korber, President, owns 100% of the stock. .4 If your firm's legal status is other than those listed above, describe it and identify its individual leaders. NA § 1.8 Identify the number of years your firm has been in business and any other significant information pertaining to your firm's history. 16 years. Former partners include Gavin Brooke and Jeffrey Ellis. Both voluntarily left on good terms to pursue different career paths. § 1.9 How many full-time employees work for your firm? .1 If your firm has multiple offices, how many total full-time employees work in the primary office from which services will be performed on the Project? All employees work primarily from home, but 3 employees use the Carbondale space on occasion § 1.10 How many full-time registered architects work for your firm? If your firm has multiple offices, how many total full-time registered architects work in the primary office from which services will be performed on the Project? All employees work from home, I FT registered employee uses Carbondale space on occasion § 1.11 Identify relevant honors and awards your firm has received. (Please limit your response to five honors and awards and a brief description of each in the prompt below. You may attach materials or a brochure to supplement the information provided below) Best of Houzz 2016 Client Satisfaction Locals Choice for Best Architecture Firm in Roaring Fork Magazine 2019 § 1.12 Describe your firm's professional and civic involvement. We offer paid time off for community involvement and provide frequent pro-bono services. Andrea Korber volunteers for CORE and for Pitkin County. She also volunteered as part of the Carbondale Public Arts Commission and as a board member for the KDNK Community Access Radio Station. Taylor Higgins volunteers for AIA Colorado and Andrea Duroux volunteers for the roaring fork chapter of the USGBC. Init. AIA Document B305TM — 2021. Copyright @ 1963, 1979, 1993, and 2021 by The American Institute of Architects. All rights reserved. The "American Institute of Architects," "AIA," the AIA Logo, and "AIA Contract Documents" are registered trademarks and may not be used without permission. This document was created 2 on 12/09/2021 15:09:27 under the terms of AIA Documents on Demand® Order No. 2114269318 , is not for resale. Is licensed for one-time use only, 1 and may only be used in accordance with the AIA Contract Documents® Documents -on -Demand — End User License Agreement. To report copyright violations, e-mail copyright@aia.org. Land+Shelters alanfor� RD.9•• § 1.13 Indicate whether your firm is certified as a governmentally recognized special business class, such as a minority business enterprise, woman business enterprise, service -disabled veteran owned small business, or a small disadvantaged business. For each, identify the certifying authority and indicate jurisdictions to which such certification applies. § 1.14 Does your firm currently carry professional liability insurance? (Insert yes or no) Yes § 1.15 Are there any pending or outstanding judgments, arbitration proceedings, or lawsuits against your firm, its parent, or a subsidiary, affiliate, or other entity having common ownership or management, in which the amount in dispute is more than $75,000? (If the answer is yes, provide an explanation) No § 1.16 In the last five years, has your firm, its parent, or a subsidiary, affiliate, or other entity having common ownership or management; (1) failed to complete services awarded to it; (2) been terminated for any reason except for an owner's convenience; (3) had any judgments, settlements, or awards against it pertaining to professional services resulting in payment of sums in excess of $75,000 or (4) filed any lawsuits or requested arbitration regarding a construction project or design services, (5) been convicted of, or indicted for, a business -related crime, or (6) had any business or professional license subjected to disciplinary action that resulted in a suspension or revocation of a license? (If the answer to any of the above is yes, provide an explanation) No § 2 CAPABILITIES § 2.1 Identify design services that your firm is capable of providing, such as programming; interior design; furniture, furnishings, and equipment design and selection; master planning; regional or urban planning; or historic preservation. Architecture; Interior Design; Furniture, Fixtures, & Equipment § 2.2 Identify other design disciplines that your firm is capable of providing, such as structural engineering, mechanical engineering, electrical engineering, landscape architecture, facility management, or commissioning. § 2.3 Describe your firm's experience with sustainable design, including areas of expertise and certifications achieved on past projects. We have expertise in natural building materials such as strawbale. We have and continue to pursue net -zero projects. We have registered and tracked LEED system points for projects though non of them went through final certification for reasons of owner's convenience. We have registered a Living Building Challenge project but did not pursue certification due to budget constraints. § 2.4 Does your firm use building information modeling (BIM)? If so, describe how your firm uses BIM and identify BIM software that your firm regularly uses. We use Revit and share 3D models in the cloud with our sub consultants. Init. AIA Document B305"m — 2021. Copyright © 1963, 1979, 1993, and 2021 by The American Institute of Architects. All rights reserved. The "American Institute of Architects," "AIA," the AIA Logo, and "AIA Contract Documents" are registered trademarks and may not be used without permission. This document was created 3 on 12/09/2021 15:09:27 under the terms of AIA Documents on Demand® Order No. 2114269318 , is not for resale, is licensed for one -lime use only, t and may only be used in accordance with the AIA Contract Documents® Documents -on -Demand — End User License Agreement. To report copyright violations, e-mail copyright@aia.org. 9 City of Aspen #2021-239 - Burlingame Childcare Center § 2.5 List other software programs, in addition to those identified in Section 2.4 that your firm uses in the design process. We use SketchUp, InDesign, Photoshop, Bluebeam Revu, and Lumion. § 2.6 Briefly describe your firm's approach to quality management. We pause and review one another's work to ensure a set of fresh eyes on work before it goes out the door. Specifically, we create a shared document that is reviewed by 3 people. The original creator or draftsperson, plus two others, typically a project manager and principal. § 2.7 Identify additional accreditations, services, skills, or personnel that you believe differentiate your firm. Land+Shelter has deep community roots. We founded our firm in a shared studio space with local artists, and regularly held art openings for the first decade of our existence. From that springboard we have provided design assistence for discounted and pro-bono rates to non -profits from Rifle to Aspen. We are grounded in the Roaring Fork Valley, which we love and support as active community participants. § 3 PROJECT DESIGN TEAM § 3.1 List design disciplines your firm will provide for the Project using its own employees. Architecture § 3.2 List design disciplines your firm will provide for the Project using consultants. Structural engineering; landscape architecture; civil engineering; mechanical, electrical, and plumbing engineering; acoustic design; energy modeling § 4 PROJECT PERSONNEL § 4.1 Identify the licensed professional and registration number under which architectural services will be performed on the Project. Andrea Korber, CO Registered Architect 401268 § 4.2 List key personnel from your firm who will be meaningfully involved in providing professional services on this Project. Include each person's position on the Project team, office location, proposed role, and experience on similar projects. Andrea Korber, Architect of Record, Principal in Charge, Carbondale, record architect for several similarly sized recent commercial projects. Taylor Higgins, Project Architect, Parker, management, some production, and coordination of consultants. This has been her role on several projects of this size, including affordable housing. Luke Keeble, Job Captain, mainly production, some consultant management, his role on similar projects. § 5 REFERENCES § 5.1 Identify three client references: (Insert name, organization, project name(s), and contact information) Dan Richardson, Ascendigo Autism Services, Ascendigo Ranch, 970-379-3414 Carla Farrand, CSU Extension, Garfield County Education Center, 970-319-9377 Heather Grant, Rifle Animal Shelter, Rifle Animal Shelter, 970-618-3279 § 5.2 Identify three contractor references: (Insert name, organization, project name(s), and contact information) Ryan Larkin, Larkin Construction, AVLT office, ACES Rock Bottom Ranch and Erickson Residence, 303-898-2704 Andy Braudis, Terralink Construction, West Smuggler Residence and True Nature, 970-379-3741 John Maas, InPlace LTD, Bookbinders, WJWJ Residence, Triple M Ranch, 970-618-2580 Init. AIA Document B305TM — 2021. Copyright @ 1963, 1979, 1993, and 2021 by The American Institute of Architects. All rights reserved. The "American Institute of Architects," "AIA," the AIA Logo, and "AIA Contract Documents" are registered trademarks and may not be used without permission. This dorument was created 4 on 12/09/2021 15:09:27 under the terms of AIA Documents on Demand® Order No. 2114269318 , is not for resale, Is licensed for one -lime use only, and may only be used in accordance with the AIA Contract Documents® Documents -on -Demand — End User License Agreement. To report copyright violations, e-mail copyright@aia.org. Land+Shelter: alas and ;,. RDR r a.�v•+�r-,.re • un w, • v��.vr_ A n r L_l iTmv- (^ § 6 REPRESENTATIVE PROJECTS List five of your firm's projects below, either completed or in progress, that are representative of your firm's experience and capabilities. If a Project is identified on page 1, include representative projects that are relevant to the Project. You may attach materials, such as photographs or renderings, to supplement the information provided below. Representative Project #1 Project Name: True Nature Healing Arts Kiva, True Nature Healing Arts Center Owner: Eaden Shantay Brief Description: Record arcizitect for a spa/spirilual center Kiva. Design and record services for a remodel and expansion of an existing building on the spa campus. Project Delivery Method: CMGC Size: 4000sf and 1500sf Construction Cost: $6 million Completion Date: May 2018 Contractor/Construction Manager: Keith Brand, Terralink (succeeded by Andy Braudis, Terralink) Representative Project #2 Project Name: Journey Home Animal Care Center Owner: Heather Grant, Executive Director of Rifle Animal Shelter Brief Description: New construction of a 12,000 animal shelter and veterinary clinic with a volunteer training classroom and staff office spaces. Project Delivery Method: CMGC Size: 12000sf Construction Cost: $2 million Completion Date: December 2021 Contractor/Construction Manager: Jeff Parrington, Tally Ho Construction Representative Project #3 Project Name: ACES Rock Bottom Ranch Education Center Owner: ACES, Christy Mahon, Development Director Brief Description: An addition and remodel to the Education Center at Rock Bottom Ranch Project Delivery Method: GMGC Size: 2000sf Construction Cost: $150,000 Init. AIA Document B305Tm — 2021. Copyright @ 1963, 1979, 1993, and 2021 by The American Institute of Architects. All rights reserved. The "American Institute of Architects," "AIA," the AIA Logo, and "AIA Contract Documents' are registered trademarks and may not be used without permission. This document was created 5 on 12/09/2021 15:09:27 under the terms of AIA Documents on Demand® Order No. 2114269318 , is not for resale, is licensed for one-time use only, f and may only be used in accordance with the AIA Contract Documents® Documents -on -Demand — End User License Agreement. To report copyright violations, e-mail copyright@aia.org. 1 1 City of Aspen #2021-239 - Burlingame Childcare Center Completion Date: 2017 Contractor/Construction Manager: Ryan Larkin, Larkin Construction Representative Project #4 Project Name: Garfield County Education Center Owner: Garfield County, Scott Henrikson Brief Description: An extensive adaptive reuse of an existing feed warehouse, transforming it into a educational center for CSLI extension and the local 4H club, including building in a floor to divide the existing warehouse into a two story space. Project Delivery Method: Design Bid Build Size: 12000sf Construction Cost: $3 million Completion Date: Ongoing Contractor/Construction Manager: TBD Representative Project #5 Project Name: Third Street Center Owner: Colin Laird, Executive Director Brief Description: Adaptive reuse of an elementary school to a center for non -profits, plus a variety of tenant finishes in the building once it was complete. Project Delivery Method: Design -Bid -Build Size: 45,000sf Construction Cost: $2.8 million Completion Date: 2010 Contractor/Construction Manager: Hans Raaflaub, B&H Construction § 7 ATTACHED DOCUMENTS AND ADDITIONAL INFORMATION (If attachments are provided, list them here) ARCHITECT'S REPRESENTATION I hereby represent that, to the best of my knowledge, the information provided in this Architect's Qualification Statement is true and accurate as of the date below. Signature Andrea Korber, Owner/Principal Printed Name and Title 12/9/2021 Date Init. AIA Document B305Tm — 2021. Copyright @ 1963, 1979, 1993, and 2021 by The American Institute of Architects. All rights reserved. The "American Institute of Architects," "AIA," the AIA Logo, and "AIA Contract Documents" are registered trademarks and may not be used without permission. This document was created s on 12/09/2021 15:09:27 under the terms of AIA Documents on Demand® Order No. 2114269318 , is not for resale, is licensed for one-time use only, 1 and may only be used in accordance with the AIA Contract Documents® Documents -on -Demand — End User License Agreement. To report copyright violations, e-mail copyright@aia.org. Land+Shelter alanford 0 Alpine Bank December 2, 2021 LAND + SHELTER INC PO BOX 550 CARBONDALE CO 81623-0550 Re: Letter of Good Standing To Whom It May Concern: Carbondale 0350 Highway 4133 Carbondale, Colorado 81623 970-963-3040 Fax 970-963-9116 Andrea Korber and Land+Shelter have been valued customers of Alpine Bank since 2017. Land+Shelter was established in 2005 and its accounts were transferred to Alpine Bank in 2017 in order to consolidate business and personal accounts within one financial institution. All accounts have been maintained faithfully with aggregate balances averaging in the six figure range. None of the accounts held by Land+Shelter or Andrea Korber have record of overdrafts and Alpine Bank would consider these accounts to be stable and financially sound. Should you have any questions, please contact me at (970) 704-3105 or at IanBays@aloinebank.com_. Thank you, Ian Bays Regional President 13 City of Aspen #2021-239 - Burlingame Childcare Center 5.1.13 RELEVANT TEAM EXPERIENCE This team's relevant experience is summed up as: RDG has programmed and designed over 50 early childhood education (ECE) centers. AFA co-founded a conference to advance the field of sustainable ECE design, in addition to completing several ECE's as architect of record. L+S is a local firm with a combination of sustainable, high alpine, and municipal work, focusing on community building projects. This team brings together the exact relevant experience required for the success of this project. The projects we have chosen to highlight include the following and additional information about each can be found in the APPENDIX at the end of this document: ASCENDIGO RANCH (new construction) Garfield County, Colorado Client: Ascendigo Autism Services ��. �''' Project Completion: Landuse Proposal Project Size: 45,500 S.F. Project Budget: TBD Owner Contact: Dan Richardson, Ascendigo Autism Services 970.379.3414 Design Architect: Land+Shelter Architect of Record: Land+Shelter GC: Ken Janckila, Janckila Construction 970.927.3143 JOURNEY HOME ANIMAL CARE CENTER (new construction) Rifle, Colorado Client: Rifle Animal Shelter Board Project Completion: In Development f ` Project Size: 12,000 S.F. Project Budget: $1.7 M ; Owner Contact: Heather Grant, Executive Director 970.625.8808 Design Architect: Land+Shelter Architect of Record: Land+Shelter GC: Jeff & Katie Parrington, Tally Ho Construction, 970.625.0208 GARFIELD COUNTY EDUCATION CENTER (repurpose/renovation) Rifle, Colorado l- Client: Board of County Commissioners of Garfield County -� Project Completion: In Development Project Size: 12,000 S.F. r i Project Budget: $2.7 M Owner Contact: Carla Farrand, CSU 970.625.3969 �- Design Architect: Land+Shelter Architect of Record: Land+Shelter GC: TBD Land+Shelter. alanfoi-d RD.9•• ..,.�...o.-.,...e ..,.. .....,..n n nri_i i�rrrc MULTI -FAMILY MIXED USE (new construction) Carbondale, Colorado Client: Eastwood Developments, Inc. Project Completion: currently in SD Project Size: 50,000 S.F. Project Budget: $20 M Owner Contact: Rob Cairncross, Eastwood Developments, Inc., 970.618.6722 Design Architect: 359 Design Architect of Record: Land+Shelter GC: TBD TRUE NATURE HEALING ARTS (new construction) Carbondale, Colorado Project Completion: 2018 Contact: Eaden Shantay, Owner 970.361.2195 Project Size: 4,000 S.F. Project Budget: $6 Mil Design Architect: Lea Sisson Architect Architect of Record: Land + Shelter GC: Andy Braudis, Terralink Structures, 970.379.3741 ACES ROCK BOTTOM RANCH EDUCATION CENTER (renovation/addition) Basalt, Colorado Project Size: 2,000sf Project Completion: 2017 Project Cost: $150,000 Owner Contact: Christy Mahon, Development Director 970.309.6262 Design Architect: Land+Shelter Architect Of Record: Land+Shelter GC: N/A MAPLETON EARLY CHILDHOOD CENTER (renovation/addition) Boulder, Colorado Completion Date: July 2013 Total Square Footage: 21,000 Sf Cost: $5,000,000 Design Architect: Alan Ford Architects Architect of Record: afa + RTA, LLC (Alan Ford Architects/RTA Architects) Owner Contact: Glen Segrue, Project Manager, Boulder Valley School Dis- trict, t 720.561.5794, glen.segrue@bvsd.org GC CONTACT: Will Valkner, (formerly with Adolfson & Peterson Construction), 303.741.61 16 STANLEY OPENAIR ACADEMY (renovation/addition) Aurora, Colorado Completion Date: November 2016 Total Square Footage: 8,000 Sf Cost: $750,000 Owner Contact: Heather Eversley, Co -Founder, OPENair Academy, 303.717.3262, heather@clifton-eversley.com Design Architect: Alan Ford Architects Architect Of Record: Alan Ford Architects GC Contact: Chris Haugen, White Construction Group, 303.688.6924x4741 BLUE SPRUCE HABITAT FOR HUMANITY DUPLEX Kittredge, Colorado (new construction) Completion Date: 2014 Size: 2,500 SF (1,250 SF/unit) Cost: $306,000 Design Architect: Alan Ford Architects Architect of Record: Alan Ford Architects Owner Contact: Kathleen O'Leary, Executive Director, Blue Spruce Habitat for Hu- manity, 303.674.1127 ext. 1, koleary@bluesprucehabitat.org GC: Tony Cingoranelli, Adolfson & Peterson Construction, 303.363.7101 ECE DESIGN CONFERENCES / ECE DESIGN PRACTICES -CASE STUDY Denver, Colorado (conceptual design) Duration: 2012-2018 Size: 18,850 SF (case study) Cost: $12 M (estimated) Design Architect: Alan Ford Architects & RDG Architects Architect of Record: Alan Ford Architects Owner Contact: confidential GC: N/A SHELTERING ARMS EARLY EDUCATION & FAMILY CENTER (new construction) Atlanta, Georgia Completion Date: September 2017 Construction Costs: $7,164,350 Size: 27,050 SF building, 2.0 acres site, 17,150 SF playground Architect of Record: RDG Design Architect: RDG Owner Contact: Blythe Robinson, President & CEO, Sheltering Arms, 404.523.2767, brobinson@shelteringarmsforkids.com GC: Reed Weigle, Division Manager, Brasfield & Gorrie, 678.581.6560, rweigleC BrasfieldGorrie.com EARLY LEARNING CENTER - GATEWAY (new construction) Omaha, Nebraska Completion Date: December 2015 Construction Costs: $7,230,000 Size: 27,200 SF building, 21,200 SF playground, 3.8 Acres site Architect of Record: RDG Design Architect: RDG Owner Contact: Gladys Haynes, Director -Nebraska Initiatives, Buffett Early Childhood Fund, 402.541.44707, gh@buffettearly.org GC: David Cavlovic, Sampson Construction, 402.827.5600, davidc@sampson-construction.com Land-4-Shelter, alanucl, THE FRANKLIN SCHOOL (new construction) Spartenburg, SC 1 Completion Date: November 2018 I i Construction Costs: $8,409,379 Size: 27,200 SF building, 21,200 SF playground, 3.8 Acres site Architect of Record: RDG Design Architect: RDG Owner Contact: Molly Talbot -Metz, President, Mary -Black = Foundation, 864.573.9500, metz@maryblackfoundation.org --= �_- -- GC: Hootie Solesbee, Harper General Contractor, 864.398.4701, Solesbee@HarperGC.com .��.0416 Ljj EARLY LEARNING CENTER - SKINNER (new construction) Omaha, Nebraska Completion Date: December 2015 Construction Costs: $6,450,000 Size: 26,350 SF building, 21,100 SF playground, 2.4 Acres site Architect of Record: RDG Design Architect: RDG Owner Contact: Gladys Haynes, Director -Nebraska Initiatives, Buffett Early Childhood Fund, 402.541.44707, gh@buffettearly.org GC: David Cavlovic, Sampson Construction, 402.827.5600, davidc@sampson-construction.com UNIVERSITY OF NEBRASKA KEARNEY - EARLY CHILDHOOD EDUCATION CENTER (new construction) Kearney, Nebraska Completion Date: December 2019 Construction Costs: $5,330,450 Size: 19,900 SF building, 20,800 SF playground, 2.3 acres site Architect of Record: RDG Design Architect: RDG Owner Contact: Alan Wedige, Campus Architect, Facilities Management & Planning, University of Nebraska -Kearney 308.240.0473, awedige@nebraska.edu GC: Scott Lockhard, Hampton Enterprises, 402.489.8858, slockhard@ hampton l .com PORTER-LEATH EARLY CHILDHOOD ACADEMY - FRAYSER (new construction) Memphis, Tennessee Completion Date: June 2021 Construction Costs: $10,229,880 Size: 35,415 SF building, 48,070 SF playground, 6.5 acres site Architect of Record: RDG Design Architect: RDG Owner Contact: Sean Lee, President, Porter -Leath, 901.577.2500. slee@porterleath.com GC: Logan Rogers, Flintco, LLC, 901.612.2885, logan.rogers@flintco. com City of Aspen #2021-239 - Burlingame Childcare Center 5.1.0 DESIGN CAPABILITIES Conceptual/Schematic - Team lead on this phase will be Alan Ford. Alan's a thought leader in the typology of ECE and the author of Sustainable Schools, and the Welcoming School. We will apply his unique strengths to this critical phase of work. His frequent collaborator of sustainable school design - Branch Pattern and Group 14, will also ensure that energy use is at the forefront of our consideration from day 1. Local teammates Kathleen Wanatowicz and Mavis Fitzgerald from Project Resource Studio will take the lead on the community outreach. With their track record of successful projects in Aspen, these two can hit the ground running as we seek to define and develop the stakeholders necessary to project success. Their longstanding City relationships will allow us to jump start this process. Support for Land Use Application and Review Process - Local architect Andi Korber will be the team lead on this phase as we navigate the likely PD amendment for Burlingame. Land+Shelter has provided architecture and planning services since it's inception and Andi has successfully led or supported complex land use approvals for past clients. Consultants Sopris Engineering and DHM are also local companies on the civil and landscape architecture side, whose experience with similar approvals in Aspen mean the documentation will be correct and complete the first time. Sopris Engineering is currently working on Burlingame and DHM recently led the preliminary phase of the Aspen Lumberyard affordable housing development. DHM's work included community outreach and planning to address housing needs, neighborhood/contextual analysis, opportunities/constraints, land planning/zoning analysis, master planning alternatives, and technical studies. The team worked closely with the City to host multiple community in -person and virtual events to understand community priorities and preferences. Land+Shelter alanford Design Development- Alan Ford Architects as design architect continues to lead the team through DD, with growing critical support from Ed Bugliwicz and RDG at this phase where building layout and systems integration will call upon the dozens of ECE's that RDG has completed over the years. Their facile design skills will allow us to manipulate options for classroom and support spaces that have worked with similar client types. It's that ease and familiarity with the type that sets our team apart. Approval Documents/Recordation - We again look to the local civil, landscape, and record architect to call on local experience and provide correct and complete approval documentation and recordation support. Jesse Swan, our civil engineering lead, with Sopris Engineering is currently working on Burlingame Phase II and completed Burlingame Phase I. Jesse's depth of knowledge as a principal of a civil and surveying company familiar with the site is valuable to any project, but especially this one. Construction Documents, Support for Permit Application Process - Land+Shelter will take the lead on documentation for CD's and permitting supported by RDG and AFA. L+S's experience providing mountain appropriate detailing and documentation will be rounded out and supported by the experience in ECE design represented by RDG and AFA. Again the consultant team is primarily locals who are familiar with the requirements to build in the mountains and specifically in Aspen. These consultants have also worked frequently with record Architect L+S, and have a familiarity and short hand that supports efficiency. Land+Shelter has frequently collaborated with Evolve Structural Design on both commercial and residential projects, and we often find ways to reduce cost and deliver sustainable solutions for budget driven projects like the Rifle Animal Shelter. Construction Administration, Closeout/Warranty - Land+Shelter, along with local consultants DHM, Sopris Engineering, and Evolve will take the lead on site visits and local observation work required for CA, Closeout, and Warranty period - supported by more office oriented review tasks assigned as appropriate to RDG, AFA, and Branch Pattern. City of Aspen #2021-239 - Burlingame Childcare Center 5.1.D IN-HOUSE PERSONNEL Land+Shelter's team includes Andrea Korber, Taylor Higgins, and Luke Keeble. Andrea is principal in charge and architect of record reviewing and stamping the work. Andrea's rate is the Principal rate on our fee spreadsheet. Andrea typically works 4-10 hours per week on similar projects. On occasion, for a week with a heavy amount of public meeting, that number can increase to 20. Taylor Higgins is project architect/project manager (also a licensed architect). She is billed at the Project Manager rate. Taylor will be coordinating with consultants and leading the documentation work in house. Taylor will start at 2-8 hours/week during conceptual, increase to 4-16 hours/week during DID, and ramp up to 40 hours/week during the height of production during CD.During CA, hours vary, but we anticipate 4 hours/week. • Luke Keeble is the job captain supporting the production work. Luke is billed at what the spreadsheet lists as the "Associate" rate. Luke will start during DD at 4-16 hours/week and ramp up to 40 hours/week during the height of production during CD. During CA, hours vary, but we anticipate 1-8 hours/week. L+S has additional staff available should they be needed for production work towards deadlines, but this dedicated team of three will carry out the bulk of the work. Andrea, Taylor, and Luke work together in this way on past projects and bring an experienced process to the role of record architect responsibilities. Andrea will work to collaborate with Alan in the front end of the project, and then take over as the lead in later phases of work where the record architect leads the team. Alan Ford Architect's team includes Alan Ford and Tyler Michieli. • Alan Ford is an ECE -12 educational specialist with a special focus on the application of research based practices particularly for early learners. He is the author of the internationally realized book "Designing the Sustainable School". Alan also brings deep experience in programming and planning. Alan will bring his expertise in applied research to the programming through design development phases of the project. He will head up the programming phase in collaboration with RDG and Land + Shelter. Additionally Alan will be the lead person on sustainable solutions for the project working closely with Group 14 Engineering. During the programming phase Alan will contribute 20 to 30 hours per week and 15 to 20 hours per week during schematic design. During design development Alan's contribution will be on the order of 10 hours per week. Alan's rate is the principal rate on our fee spreadsheet. • Tyler Michieli is a senior architect and project manager who focuses on the technical aspects of translating the design into a deliverable documents package. During early design and programming Tyler will focus on code and licensing requirement issues as well as site development concerns such as zoning codes, traffic studies, and utilities, anticipating 8hrs a week. During the design phase Tylerwill lead the efforts to integrate the architectural Land+Shelter alas' � ,'_ Pr ........ c— I o..i..... � AMlt]irrrrc design with the necessary systems designs of structural, mechanical, plumbing, and other minor systems at approximately 16hrs a week. For final documentation and construction administration Tyler will provide quality control reviews and technical guidance to facilitate the design vision becoming a reality; approx. 4-8hrs a week. Tyler's rate is the manager rate on our fee spreadsheet. RDG's primary team includes Ed Buglewicz and Molly Haas. Ed is a subject matter expert in early care and education programs and the environments that support these programs. He will contribute to the programming and conceptual development with AFA, and oversee the preparation of the interior plans and details during DID and CD phases. Ed will typically contribute 8-14 hours per week during these design phases, occasionally extending up to 20 hours per week to assist with important meetings and milestones. Ed's rate is the 'Principal' rate on our fee spreadsheet. Molly Haas is an experienced designer and licensed architect with focus on ECE projects the past 4 years. Molly will be assisting Ed and AFA on the development of the interior plans and details. She will start at 2-4 hours per week during conceptual phase, and increase to 14-20 hours per week during DID, and CD phases. Molly's involvement during CA will be more limited, anticipating an equivalent of 1 hour/week. Molly is billed at the 'Senior" rate. RDG's Early Learning Studio has staff available with parallel knowledge on your project type should they be needed to support the team on the completion of the design deliverables. RDG and AFA have an established process of working together in similar roles of project delivery that will provide effective development of the design goals for this project. 21 City of Aspen #2021-239 - Burlingame Childcare Center ABOUT ANDREA: Andrea's 19 years of experience, 12 of which with Land+Shelter, comprise a broad background including residential, commercial, and institutional work. Andrea takes pride in the deep community ties forged through projects like the Third Street Center and True Nature Healing Arts. Throughout her early career, Andrea taught architecture while practicing — first at the Harvard Design School Career Discovery Program and later at the Georgia Tech College of Architecture. She is passionate about the power of design to create a better world. She is an avid skier and pursues her own fine art projects outside of the office. IN THE COMMUNITY - Andrea serves on the annual Udall Grant committee for CORE and has volunteered with Pitkin County on the 2019 code revision task force. Andrea recently stepped down as the president of the KDNK community radio station board. She is a past member of CPAC (Carbondale Public Arts Commission), former board member for the American Institute of Architects (AIA) Atlanta Chapter, and the Atlanta Housing And Neighborhood Developers (AHAND) Affordable Housing Policy Advocacy Team. AIA, LEED AP, PRINCIPAL Bachelor of Arts, Dartmouth College 1998 Master of Architecture, Harvard Graduate School of Design 2002 SELECT PROJECTS: ASCENDIGO RANCH ADVENTURE CAMP Andrea is the lead architect on a new campus for Ascendigo Autism Services. This work in progress includes exciting goals for model energy approach for a new campus in Western Colorado. Andrea worked with staff from all departments within the Ascendigo organization to develop their novel program and translate their groundbreaking work into architecture that is tailored to the needs of individuals on the Autism spectrum. Owner: Dan Richardson at Ascendigo Autism Services 970.927.3143; GC: Ken Janckila at Jankila Construction Inc 970.927.6714 GARFIELD COUNTY EDUCATION CENTER Andrea was the lead architect for this net -zero energy, adaptive reuse project which transforms a feed warehouse into a makerspace and flexible 4H education facility. Her experience with youth organizations and sustainable building practices helped the Net -Zero ready project meet the unspoken needs of its users. The Garfield County Education Center will house the Western Colorado 4H club along with classrooms for Colorado State University extension programs, and Garfield County fairgrounds. Owner: Carla Farrand, CSU 970.625.3969; GC: N/A CARBONDALE PUBLIC OUTREACH The Town of Carbondale has hired Andrea twice to lead public outreach campaigns on public planning issues. First, Andrea lead a community outreach program around the Third Street improvement project, and second Andrea lead a community input process on pedestrian safety Outreach Client: Janet Buck: GC: N/A. THIRD STREET CENTER Land+Shelter brought together the Roaring Fork School District, The Town of Carbondale, and dozens of local non -profits in an effort to create a much -needed affordable building for non- profits. Andrea hel ed transform this tired building into a vibrant community center. In addition to Land+Shelter's financial and planning role, L+S become the Owner's Rep for the Third Street Center board, overseeing all contracts from inception to completion. Owner: Colin Laird ED 970.309.2053; GC: Hans Raaflaub (retired) at B&H General Contractors 970.945.0102 Land Shelter alan'`' ANDREA KORBER Land+Shelter ASPEN VALLEY LAND TRUST Andrea worked with long time colleagues at AVLT to design their headquarters in Carbondale, Colorado. The gut remodel included a playful garage door design to create a flexible open conference area and a small room was created as a "telephone booth" for privacy needs in the open office area. Owner: Melissa Sumera 970.963.8440; GC: Ryan Larkin at Larking Construction 303.898.2704 TRUE NATURE KIVA SPA - RECORD ARCHITECT Andrea was hired to resolve a challenging project delivery for a downtown Carbondale retreat, restaurant, boutique, and spa. The True Nature Kiva-Spa was designed by design architect Lea Sisson. The owner and contractor decided to go with the dependable crew at Land+Shelter, lead by Andrea Korber, in order to steer this complex project to success. Owner: Eaden Shantay 970.361.2195 GC: Terralink Construction, Keith Brand 970.379.8002 & Andy Braudis 970.379.3741 ADDITIONAL PROJECTS: • Bookbinders Bookstore, Basalt, CO • Eagle's Rise, Pitkin County, CO • Wilderness Workshop Offices, Carbondale, CO • SGM Office Remodel, Glenwood Springs, CO • Rifle Animal Shelter, Rifle, CO • EPA Case Study, Atlanta, GA • Outpost Bali Co -working Space, Ubud, Bali • Aspen Skiing Company Ticket Office, Basalt, CO • Turnabout Ranch, Pitkin County, CO • Osmia Organics, Carbondale, CO • ACES, Rock Bottom Ranch Education Center Remodel, Eagle County, CO • WJWJ Ranch, Various Projects, Eagle and Pitkin County, CO • Third Street Center, with Energy & Sustainable Design, Carbondale, CO • Eastwood 133 Self Storage Facility, Carbondale, CO • Carbondale Mixed Use Multifamily, Carbondale, CO • Various Residential Projects from Moab to Aspen • Taylor&Tessier Jewelry Retail Store, Carbondale, CO • Sopris Engineering Exterior Remodel, Carbondale, CO • Abundant Acres Ranch, Pitkin County, CO • Bookbinders Bookstore, Basalt, CO • Three Bs Bakery, Carbondale, CO City of Aspen #2021-239 - Burlingame Childcare Center AIA, NCARB, ARCHITECT Master of Architecture, Kansas State University 2012 ABOUT TAYLOR: SELECT PROJECTS: Taylor has worked in the profession WOODMAN-ARLETA LIHTC PROJECT - C&S DESIGN AND ENGINEERING for the last decade on a range of commercial and residential projects. Taylor was the project architect for C&S Design and Engineering in the redevelopment of two y p l g g g p In her 8+ years of affordable housing experience she has gained in depth existing apartment complexes located in Los Angeles, California. A total of 104 units were renovated as art of this affordable housing project along with new community buildings foundry facilities_ The developed to include knowledge of building cedes, no accessibility guidelines and ADA that included and administrotive sites were also ADA accessible paths, mailboxes, gardens and parking. These projects required significant the Enterprise Green Community coordination with the city of LA for multiple permits, the HUD consultant for drawing review and program. She has become adept corrections for the HUD drawing submittal and multiple design consultants. at project management and Owner: SDG Housing - 310.321.7862/GC: TBD (owner coord builder RFP) working with clients from the early design stage through construction ACOMA COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT LIHTC PROJECT - TRAVOIS ARCHITECTS administration. In her time outside of the office, she is likely tackling a DIY Multi -family townhomes with a community center and outdoor community space project at home, out in the garden or Taylor was the project designer and architect for Travois in this new multi -family development baking something. located on the Pueblo of Acoma Indian Reservation in New Mexico. She designed and produced construction documents for three buildings which included 32 town home units, IN THE COMMUNITY: a central community building, an outdoor fawn, park and basketball court and parking for the development, Affordable housing projects are complex and are heavily reliant an Taylor serves many roles in the strong organization and coordination skills. She coordinated the Pueblo of Acoma Housing Denver area. Taylor is a member Authority, the financial investor, the tax credit consultants, the engineers and the contractor for of the AIA Denver Chapter, an comprehensive project management. Owner: PAHA (Pueblo of Acoma Housing Authority) - associate member of ULI Denver, 505.552,7528/GC: Pavilion Construction - 505.346.0085 and has experience in Design/Build renovation projects. She volunteers with Denver AIA on the Committee for MISSION PLUMBING HEATING AND COOLING CORPORATE OFFICE the Environment, a group that works An existing office building located in downtown Shawnee, Kansas was dated and broken into to make an impact in the Colorado small tenant spaces. The Mission Heating and Cooling company acquired the building and design community advocating hired framework design to reimagine the building and the interior space as their new corporate for sustainable practices. She is a office. Taylor was the lead architect for the project which included coordinating with the client registered Architect in the State of and consultants to create the drawings and specifications for permit and construction. The Missouri, Kansas, and Colorado program included reception, secure individual offices, conference space, office support spaces where she has served as an ICC Pike printing and break rooms, training assembly space and a new stairwell to connect the lower residential building, plumbing, and and main floors of the previously divided building. mechanical inspector. Owner: Matt Hugunin - 913.963.3098/GC - coord by owner SAMPLE ADDITIONAL PROJECTS: SECOND BEST COFFEE • Little River Band Elder Housing, Manistee, A small coffee startup was looking for a new hip location in south Kansas City and they hired MI framework design to bring their vision to life. Taylor was the lead designer for this coffee shop, • UPTHA LIHTC Homes, Cedar City, UT which included a small kitchen, a coffee production space, retail counter, customer seating • Holt Residence, Bonner Springs, KS and back of house mechanical and restrooms. She worked with the client and their team of • Sokaogon Supportive Residence, Crandon, consultants to pull together the branding and the space to establish permit drawings and assist Wl in acquiring health department approval. • Scheuer Residence, Aspen, CO Owner: Nathan Anderson /GC: Integrated Construction Solutions LLC -dissolved • Stanley Residence, Parker, CO Land+Shelter alas ti•• T >A 10, ABOUT LUKE: Growing up in Iowa, Luke has worked in multiple design firms across different states. Luke brings a high level of visualization and graphic knowlege to the team. His work as a freelance on architectural visualizations has provided both modeling and rendering services to clients. Allowing them to visualize all aspects of the project. IN THE COMMUNITY: Since coming to the Roaring Fork Valley, Luke has been an integral part of his local gym in Basalt. Luke along with his partner Morgan have worked on bringing a new competitors class to Roaring Fork Crossfit for members looking to become more competitive in the sport. ADDITIONAL PROJECTS: • Garfield County Education Center, Rifle, CO • Rifle Animal Shelter, Rifle, CO • Minnesota Lake House, Leech Lake, MN • Spanish Peaks Inn, Big Sky, Mont. (POSS Architecture) • Branded Residences, Big Sky, Mont. (POSS Architecture) JOB CAPTAIN Bachelor of Architecture, Iowa State University 2018 SELECT PROJECTS: EASTWOOD 133 STORAGE FACILITY Luke is currently providing drawing and design services on a 70,000 SF storage facility project for the town of carbondale through its annexation process. He has assited with storage unit layout, building identity, and compliance with the towns zoning codes. During the process, he has created drawings that focus on the community outreach and integration of a artwalk into the project. The project is now in for permit with the Town of Carbondale. Owner: Rob Cairncross at Eastwood 133 LLC, 970.618.6722; GC: Matt Gwost at RA Nelson 970.904.0518 CARBONDALE YOUTH ART PARK Luke designed and created drawings for Carbondale Arts on a Youth Art Park proposal located on the Rio Grande ArtWay in Carbondale. Working with RFTA, Luke layed out plans integrating design ideas from local middle school students in Carbondale. He was able to create a package that collected and combined the students ideas into a holistic proposal that Carbondale Arts could use in their grant application process. Owner: Amy Kimberly at Carbondale Arts 970.963.1680; GC - N/A ASCENDIGO Luke worked along side his L+S team to create and design this new campus and summer camp for individuals on the Austism spectrum. Luke worked on conceptual design, creating floor plans, conceptual renderings, and 3D massing models used for client discussion and community outreach. He helped research the local vernacular of the site to provide a desgin for a campus that fits into the overall character and language of this beautiful rural landscape. Owner- Dan Richardson at Ascendigo Autism Services 970.927.3143; GC - Ken Janckila at Jankila Construction Inc 970.927.6714 SPANISH PEAKS INN (POSS ARCHITECTURE) As a Job Captain for this 50 roam, 25 timeshare luxury resort property in Big Sky, Mont., Luke worked on all aspects of project design from conceptual design all the way through Construction Documents. Luke worked with the POSS Architecture team to draft and design this 115,000 SF building which included addressing detailing for an underground service tunnel connecting the building to its neighbor property accross the street. City of Aspen #2021-239 - Burlingame Childcare Center ALAN FORD ARCHITECTS CORE TEAM EDUCATION • University of Colorado Denver, Master of Architecture - 1980 • University of Colorado Boulder, Bachelor in Environmental Design with Honors - 1978 PROFESSIONAL AFFILIATIONS • State of Colorado License, 202113 • Fellow of American Institute of Architects (FAIA) • Association for Learning Environments (A4LE) PROFESSIONAL ACTIVITIES • Co -Founder of the Early Childhood Design Conference : 2012 - 2018 • President 2014 and Board Member 2015 - Current: Rocky Mountain Chapter, Assoc. for Learning Environments (A4LE) • Author: Designing the Sustainable School and A Sense of Entry, The Images Publishing Group : 2007 Mapleton Early Childhood Center Alan B. Ford, FAIR PRINCIPAL Alan Ford is a licensed architect with over 40 years of experience. Alan's experience in high-performance educational environments dates back to his 1979 graduate school thesis for a new high school in Pagosa Springs, Colorado, which included passive solar strategies, daylighting and ground - source geothermal heating and cooling. Since then, Alan has designed over 100 significant educational projects within the State of Colorado. Alan's enthusiasm for design of learning environments recently resulted in his authoring of two books: Designing the Sustainable School and A Sense of Entry, both published by The Images Publishing Group of Australia. RELEVANT PROJECTS Mapleton Early Childhood Education Center: Boulder, CO Alan Ford headed the assessment, programming, design phases throughout the project. The project consisted of the conversion of historic Mapleton Elementary School to early childhood learning center. The project scope included a new entry and lobby addition, complete systems replacements, and inferior renovation (taken down to the original shell structure and put back in compliance to historic resignation). Masonry repair to the historic exterior and a new Hydronic HVAC system that was integrated into the existing building was also included in the project scope. The project team focused on designing to the 21 st century while maintaining the rntegnty of the historical building. Glenn Segrue, Boulder Valley School District, Project Manager 720- 561-5794 Will Valkner (now with JHL Consructors), Adolfson & Peterson Construction, Preconstruction Manager 303-741-6116 Stanley OPENair Academy Early Childhood Education Facility: Aurora, CO Alan Ford assisted the client with determining the appropriate site, programming, and was the Principal in Charge of the design throughout the project The design challenge was to convert what was originally an aviation 1#acility with deep bays and low ceilings into a welcoming early childhood center. The ECE was situated within a mixed -use complex including extensive outdoor fields, event spaces, retail, and office spaces. The program was Reggio Emilia based in the diverse setting was incorporated into the learning experience. The center serves 102 students ages six weeks to 5 years old. The design was intended to give teachers and students a blank slate, allowing them to have a voice in shaping their learning environment. Transparency between spaces was used to provide a connected learning experience. Tubular devices were used to supplement natural daylighting into the interior of the building and into the learning experience through creative use of day lighting. Heather Eversley, Clifton-Eversley, CO -Founder- OPENair Academy 303-717-3262 Chris Haugen, White Construction Group, Vice President 303-688-6924 Ext. 4741 Land+Shelter alan-s (_ffF' + RD.9•• Alan B. Ford, FAIA PROGRAMMING & DESIGN PRINCIPAL RMSER (Rocky Mountain SER): Pueblo, CO Alan Ford led Programming and Master Plan phases to convert two elementary schools into early childhood education centers, as well as community centers and workforce development services. The focus was to identify RMSER's ethos, creating a program that reflects their identity while also providing 21 st century early childhood learning, all while balancing the client's needs and wants. The team conducted assessments of the abandoned facilities, interviews of key stakeholders, and multiple Design Advisory Group meetings. Lance Vieira, Rocky Mountain SER, COO 303-480-9394 Alan Freidhof, Latcon, Vice President of Estimating, 719-924-1083 Kim PK-12 School: Kim, CO Renovation / Addition Alan Ford provided programming through construction administration. Monica Johnson, Kim School District, Former Superintendent 303-622-2698 Brian Townsend, JHL Constructors, Inc. Vice President 303-741-61 16 Brady Exploration School: Lakewood, CO Alan Ford led Programming and Master Planning for the project and served as Principal in Charge of Design through construction and administration. Sam Miller, Jeffco Public Schools, Senior Project Manager Construction Management - 303-982-2549 Josh Hill PMP, Himmelman Construction, Senior Project Manager 303-790-1984 Lyons Middle/Senior High School Auditorium Addition: Lyons, CO Alan Ford led Programming and Master Planning for the project and served as Principal in Charge of Design through construction and administration. Conan Smith PMP, St. Wain Valley School District, Construction Project Manager 303-682-7372 Brett Sorenson, Golden Triangle Construction, Senior Project Manager - 303-772-4051 Denver School of the Arts: Denver, CO Alan Ford will lead the Programming and Master Planning efforts on this project that is just getting underway. Denver Public Schools, Heather Bock Director of Construction 720-423-1851 Paul Vargo, Haselden Construction, Senior Estimator- 303-728-381 1 T i Mors ' • i I City of Aspen #2021-239 - Burlingame Childcare Center ALAN FORD ARCHITECTS CORE TEAM Tyler Michieli, AIA DESIGN ARCHITECT Tyler is a licensed architect and experienced project manager with over 10 years of project experience in higher education, PK-12, large residential, and an assortment of other unique projects. Tyler enjoys working on a variety of project types and sizes from ground up construction, to renovations of historic buildings, to master planning. He is particularly passionate about early childhood care and has served as the chair of the advisory board for a non-profit ECE center. Tyler brings his passion for design and detailing to the University of Colorado Denver College of Architecture where he has taught design studio and is currently instructing the studio on a childcare center design. EDUCATION RELEVANT PROJECTS • University of Oregon, Portland, Master of DSST College View Soccer Field Addition: Denver, CO Architecture - 2010 As Project Manager, Tyler, lead a team of Civil Engineers, • University of Colorado, Traffic Engineers, and Landscape Architects through a design and permitting process for a new soccer field for an existing school on a new parcel of land Boulder, Bachelor in adjacent to the school property. The school district was in the process of Environmental Design purchasing land from the landowner and securing an access easement from - 2007 another, which required reviews with the City of Denver, the State Division of Fire Prevention and Control, the State Plumbing Board (for a variance request), as well as CDOT. The field itself is CHSAA compliant and requires 16' PROFESSIONAL AFFILIATIONS of retaining walls to mitigate the grade change over the site, providing the only field for this land locked school. • State of Colorado License, 404256 Scott Sands, Denver Public Schools, Construction Project Manager 720-423-1895 • American Institute of Architects (AIA) TBD - project is currently bidding. Lyons Middle/Senior High School Auditorium Addition: Lyons, CO PROFESSIONAL ACTIVITIES As Project Manager, Tyler, led a comprehensive design • Co-chair of Non-profit team from initial kick-off through construction completion. The design Co -Op Early Childhood started with a programming effort including a ❑AG process and preliminary Education Center: 2017 - budgeting estimating prior to the onboarding of the CMGC. Once the Present scope was defined the project went through an approximately 9 month • Jury reviewer for various design process with two bid packages, to release foundations prior to ground studios at University of freeze, including major owner reviews at SD, DID and 90% CDs. Tyler, oversaw Colorado -Denver: 2014 - the construction administration for the design team over the 12 month Present construction process on this 16,000sf, $9.2m, performance theater. • LEED Green Associate Conan Smith PMP, St. Vrain Valley School District, Construction Project Training Workshop : 2010 Manager 303-682-7372 • Exhibitor in Eco-topia Brett Sorenson, Golden Triangle Construction, Senior Juried Exhibition : 2010 Project Manager- 303-772-4051 Land+Shelter RD� alan��- Tyler Michieli, AIA DESIGN ARCHITECT Brady Exploration School: Lakewood, CO Tyler's role as assistant project manager to Alan Ford (PM and PIC), 'included being actively involved in the programming process of developing a masterplan with the DAG to develop the long-term goals for improvements, defining the scope of work for the current construction, and design input on the finalized scope of work. During documentation of the project Tyler oversaw the architectural team and actively participated in design coordination with the consulting engineers of the project and well as providing quality control reviews of the architectural drawings. Tyler was available on an as needed basis during construction administration to fill in or provide guidance during this phase. Sam Miller, Jeffco Public Schools, Senior Project Manager Construction Management - 303-982-2549 Josh Hill PMP, Himmelman Construction, Senior Project Manager 303-790-1984 South High School, Various Projects: Denver, CO ,I Tyler has been working on South High School since the very beginning of his architectural career and has held various positions and worked with various teams throughout the years. Most recently Tyler has been providing services as the Project Manager directly responsible for the scoping, cost estimating, design, documentation, and implementation of the 2017 Bond Renovations and the current CTE renovation. Tari Gold, Denver Public Schools, Construction Project Manager- 720-413-0817 (2017 Bond) Bob Bustos, Gilmore Construction, Vice President Construction Operations - 303-371.-5700 (CTE, current) Paul Vargo, Haselden Construction, Senior Estimator - 303-728-3811 29 City of Aspen #2021-239 - Burlingame Childcare Center RDG PLANNING & DESIGN CORE TEAM EDUCATION • University of Nebraska Lincoln, Master of Architecture - 1996 • University of Nebraska Lincoln, Bachelor of Science Architecture - 1994 PROFESSIONAL AFFILIATIONS • State of Nebraska License, #A3896 • State of Georgia License, #RA014131 • State of South Carolina License, #9713 • State of Tennessee License, # 105494 • State of Massachusetts License, # 9514790-AR-R • National Council of Architects Registration Board (NCARB) • American Institute of Architects (AIA) • Association for the Education of Young Children (NAEYC) PRESENTATIONS • 2020 Nebraska Planning and Zoning Conference - Kearney, NE • 2018 Thriving Children, Families and Communities - Kearney, NE • 2016 Early Childhood Education Design Conference - Denver, CO • 2014 Edward Zigler Center in Child Development and Social Policy: Yale School of Medicine • 2013 Early Childhood Education Design Conference: Denver, CO Edward Buglewicz, AIA EARLY CHILDHOOD ENVIRONMENTAL SPECIALIST Ed is exclusively dedicated to the design and implementation of early childhood education facilities. He has provided essential contributions to the Educare Learning Network from inception of the program recognized nationally for quality programming, research outcomes and design award winning environments. He understands the profound influence that building interiors and outdoor environments have on the development of young children. RELEVANT PROJECTS • Educare Learning Network Educare Springfield - Springfield, Massachusetts Owner: Mary Walachy, Former Executive Director, Irene E. & George A. Davis Foundation 413.433.9802 marywalachy@gmail.com Contractor: Lynne Badgett, Western Builders, 413.322.3077 Ibadgett@westernbuilders.com Educare Washington D.C. - Springfield, Massachusetts Owner: Jessie Rasmussen, President, Buffett Early Childhood Fund 402.541.4030 jr@buffettearly.org Contractor: Will Stann, Forrester Construction 240.876.0894 wstann@forresterconstruction.com Porter -Leath - Memphis, Tennessee Early Childhood Academy - South Memphis Early Childhood Academy - Frayser Early Childhood Academy - Orange Mound Early Childhood Academy - Hickory Hill Owner: Sean Lee, President, Porter -Leath 901.577.2500 ext 1 151 slee@porterleath.org Contractor: Logan Rogers, Flintco Construction 901.612.2885 logan.rogers@flintco.com Northside Development - Spartanburg, South Carolina The Franklin School Early Learning Center Owner: Molly Talbot -Metz, President, Mary Black Foundation 864.573.9500 mmetz@maryblcckfoundation.org Contractor: Hootie Solesbee, Harper General Contractor 864.398.4701 jsolesbee@HarperGC.com Buffett Early Childhood Fund & Omaha Public Schools - Omaha, Nebraska Omaha Early Learning Center at Gateway Elementary Omaha Early Learning Center at Skinner Magnet Center Omaha Early Learning Center at Kennedy Elementary Owner: Gladys Haynes, Director -Nebraska Initiatives, Buffett Early Childhood Fund, 402.541.4477 gh@buffettearly.org Contractor: David Cavlovic, Sampson Construction 402.827.5600 davidc@sampson-construction.com Sheltering Arras - Atlanta, Georgia Early Education & Family Center Owner: Blythe Robinson, President & CEO, Sheltering Arms 404.523,2767 brobinson@shelteringarmsforkids.com Contractor: Reed Weigle, Brasfield & Gorrie 678.581.6560 RWeigle@BrasfieldGorrie.com University of Nebraska -Kearney -Kearney, Nebraska Plambeck Early Childhood Education Center Owner: Alan Wedige, Campus Architect, University of Nebraska - Kearney 308.865.8959 awedige@nebraska.edu Contractor: Scott Lockhard, Hampton Enterprises 402.489.8858 slockhard@hamptonl.com Land+Shelter. alanf �`• RDG PLANNING & DESIGN CORE TEAM EDUCATION • Kansas State University, non-Baccalureate Master of Architecture PROFESSIONAL AFFILIATIONS • State of Nebraska License, #A-5139 • National Council of Architects Registration Board (NCARB) • American Institute of Architects (AIA) Molly Haas, AIA EARLY CHILDHOOD DESIGNER Molly joined RDG in 2017 and quickly developed her passion to define thoughtfully designed spaces for those in our communities at opposite ends of the life spectrum. Molly has contributed to the success of projects with the Early Learning and Senior Living teams, focusing her passion into buildings catering specifically to the needs of their demographic. Molly is drawn to complex problems that require elegant and unique solutions. She approaches every project with an open mind, as she believes flexibility is key to creativity and problem solving. She brings a passion for optimization and efficiency as well as a technical rigor and expertise. RELEVANT PROJECTS • Educare Learning Network Educare Springfield - Springfield, Massachusetts Owner: Mary Walachy, Former Executive Director, Irene E. & George A. Davis Foundation 413.433.9802 marywalachy@gmail.com Contractor: Lynne Badgett, Western Builders, 413.322.3077 Ibadgett@westernbuilders.com Porter -Leath - Memphis, Tennessee Early Childhood Academy - Frayser Early Childhood Academy - Orange Mound Early Childhood Academy - Hickory Hill Owner: Sean Lee, President, Porter -Leath 901.577.2500 ext 1 151 slee@porterleath.org Contractor: Logan Rogers, Flintco Construction 901.612.2885 logon.rogers@flintco.com • Northside Development- Spartanburg, South Carolina The Franklin School Early Learning Center Owner: Molly Talbot -Metz, President, Mary Black Foundation 864.573.9500 mmetz@maryblackfoundation.org Contractor: Hootie Solesbee, Harper General Contractor 864.398.4701 jsolesbee@HarperGC.com • Buffett Early Childhood Fund & Omaha Public Schools - Omaha, Nebraska Omaha Early Learning Center at Kennedy Elementary Owner: Gladys Haynes, Director -Nebraska Initiatives, Buffett Early Childhood Fund, 402.541.4477 gh@buffettearly.org Contractor: David Cavlovic, Sampson Construction 402.827.5600 davidc@sampson-construction.com University of Nebraska -Kearney -Kearney, Nebraska Plambeck Early Childhood Education Center Owner: Alan Wedige, Campus Architect, University of Nebraska - Kearney 308.865.8959 awedige@nebraska.edu Contractor: Scott Lockhard, Hampton Enterprises 402.489.8858 slockhard@hamptonl.com 1 City of Aspen #2021-239 - Burlingame Childcare Center Alan Ford, FAIA Programming & Design Principal -in -Charge Tyler Michieli, AIA Design Architect Alan Ford Architects Denver, CO STRUCTURAL ENGINEERING Evolve Structural Design Carbondale, CO LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT DHM Design Carbondale, CO IRRIGATION DESIGN ARCHITECT OF RECORD Andrea Korber, AIA Principal Taylor Higgins, AIA Project Architect Luke Keeble Job Captain Land + Shelter Carbondale, CO MEP ENGINEERING BranchPattern Denver, CO SUSTAINABILITY CONSULTANT Groupl4 Engineering Denver, CO TRAFFIC ENGINEERING Edward Buglewicz, AIA Early Childhood Environment Specialist Molly Haas, AIA Early Childhood Designer RDG Planning & Design Omaha, NE CIVIL ENGINEERING Sopris Engineering Carbondale, CO COMMUNITY OUTREACH Project Resource Studio Carbondale, CO FOODSERVICE DESIGN HydroSystems*KDI McDowell Engineering Sturm Consulting, Inc. Lakewood, CO 0 Eagle, CO 0 Tulsa, OK PROJECT RESOURCE STUDIO.,' Project Resource Studio 981 Cowen Dr A2 Carbondale, CO 81623 Kathleen Wanatowicz, 970.618.5114, kathleen@prstudioco.com prstudioco.com Project Resource Studio: PR Studio, LLC, dba Project Resource Studio [PRS], is a strategic communications consulting firm that provides comprehensive stakeholder involvement planning services, project marketing, and public relations strategies for project teams, small and large municipalities, government agencies, developers, and businesses. PRS has an extensive background tackling community development issues with several municipalities throughout the Roaring Fork Valley, including the Town of Carbondale, City of Glenwood Springs, City of Aspen, Garfield County, Pitkin County, and Eagle County. Their highly collaborative team specializes in designing thoughtful approaches to identifying key stakeholders and connecting diverse groups through streamlined channels of engagement that deliver a fuller and deeper understanding of a project's mission. �AIYY PPP PRS is a go -to for local outreach in the Roaring Fork Valley and have a proven track record in moving complex projects forward to completion, developing long-term relationships with clients, and marketing new products and programs. DHM Design 311 Main Street Carbondale, CO 81623 Jason Jaynes, 970.963.6520, jjaynes@dhmdesign.com dhmdesign.com DHM Design: DHM was founded over 40 years ago in Denver and over 20 years ago DHM added the Roaring Fork Valley office in Carbondale. Half of DHM's work is in the public sector. Much of that has been conducted in the region's monumental National Parks, where DHM has been restoring degraded environments and enhancing visitor experiences for almost 50 years. The ethos of the National Parks, and the conservation and design principles DHM practiced in them, translates to every project: Protect natural systems and human history. Reveal opportunities for exploration and enjoyment. Leave a light footprint. "" "' "'-'' The DHM team is committed to open-minded engagement with project stakeholders, and have learned that communication and trust make possible the union of divergent viewpoints, and that in turn makes landscapes that can be cherished and sustained. SOPRIS ENGINEERING ■ LLC civil consultants Sopris Engineering, LLC 502 Main Street, A-3 Carbondale, CO 81623 Stephanie Helfenbein, 970.704.0593, stephonie@sopriseng.com soprisengineering.com Sopris Engineering: Since incorporation in November 1994, SE has provided civil engineering and surveying services for development of small and large-scale projects throughout the Roaring Fork and Colorado River valleys, with a focus on public entities and school districts. Over the past 25 years, SE has worked on more than 3,000 projects in Cities and Towns throughout western Colorado. The staff has developed a professional working relationship with the Valley's government agencies, private developers, and construction firms. This background has enabled SE to acquire a comprehensive knowledge of the land use regulations, technical specifications, construction methods and costs necessary to have projects be compliant and run smoothly. %pi HY tit�t, Sopris has worked with L+S forl6 years and is the civil engineering on Burlingame Ranch Phase II so is very familiar with the project site and constraints. ?; City of Aspen #2021-239 - Burlingame Childcare Center Evolve Structural Design 1040 Main Street IF Carbondale, CO 81623 EA\/ .. Sara Mickus, 970.618.51 14, , w d u i U If AL O E S I G N sara@evolvestruct.com evolvestruct.com Evolve Structural: As an established firm in the Western Slope region of Colorado, Evolve excels at integrating sensible structural designs with the inspiring aesthetic and operational needs of mountain and resort communities. Certified as a DBE/EBE/MWBE/ SBE business through the City and County of Denver, the Evolve team provides comprehensive structural engineering services that cultivate sustainable material use and construction whenever possible. Throughout design and construction phases, our dedication to collaboration and responsiveness has been found to be invaluable. We also take pride in building upon the unique visual and inherent strengths of each endeavor, while creating cost-effective, code -compliant solutions. Evolve Structural Design has teamed with Land+Shelter recently on residential and commercial projects, including the Garfield County Education Center. They round out our team of frequent local collaborators. BranchPattern BranchPattern 3511 Ringsby Court, Suite 105 Denver, CO 80216 Matt Coulter, 720.398.6048 mattc@branchpattern.com branchpattern.com BranchPattern: BranchPattern is a building consultancy guided by their longstanding purpose of Improving Life through Better Built EnvironmentsO. Creating truly high -performing buildings is complex, but they believe it shouldn't feel that way for their customers. Specialisms within their Building Science practice are led and supported, from start to finish by a team of progressive experts in the fields of engineering, architecture, social science, testing and analytics. Over the last 30 years, BranchPattern's expertise has been honed on K-12 campuses. Throughout this experience, they have collaborated with K-12 facilities to integrate new technologies, striven for greater energy -efficiency and improved the experience of these learning environments. By applying a human -centered design approach into the design process, BranchPattern has helped educational clients provide environments that result in improvements to student performance. Based on our prior project experience working with BranchPattern, AFA and RDG view Branch Pattern as a leader in creating state of the art MEP systems with a focus on occupant and environmental health. Groupl4 Engineering, PBC Groupo 1325 East 16th Avenue Denver, CO 80218 Libby Coleman, 303.861.2070 Icoleman@groupl4eng.com groupl4eng.com Groupl4 Engineering is a 48-person, Denver -based consulting firm committed to improving the energy and resource efficiency of buildings. Groupl4 is a recognized authority in sustainable design and energy efficiency, building commissioning, and LEED project management. They offer a unique combination of energy design assistance, commissioning of new and existing facilities, and ongoing monitoring of buildings with advanced software analytics. Group 14's suite of services offers resource efficiency solutions across the life -cycle of a building portfolio. Their expertise in all stages of built environment projects - master planning, LEED consulting, energy design assistance, commissioning, measurement and verification, and existing building optimization - informs a strategic approach to integrated service delivery. - Group14 Engineering is a leader in energy modeling and sustainable design consulting throughout Colorado for public and private entities. Land+Shelter alan`� CDOWELL " ENGINEEKING.LLC McDowell Engineering, LLC 241 Broadway Street, Suite 202 Eagle, CO 81631 Greg Schroeder, 970.948.1376 greg@mcdowelleng.com mcdowelleng.com McDowell Engineering, LLC was formed in 2008 to provide specialized traffic and transportation engineering to mountain and Western Slope communities of Colorado. They specialize in bridging the gap between traffic analysis and recommendations to coordination with outside agencies and a civil engineer that will prepare the construction drawings. McDowell Engineering currently has five traffic/transportation engineers and one office administrator on staff, headquartered out of Eagle, Colorado. All work will be performed or overseen by a Colorado -licensed professional engineer (PE) and professional traffic operations engineer (PTOE). McDowell Engineering has been working in the City of Aspen for many years and is familiar with the Roaring Fork Valley. McDowell Engineering is CDOT Pre -qualified in Transportation & Traffic Engineering. vy � mt1-uovvi:it McDowell Engineering has been working in the City of Aspen for many years and frequently completes studies throughout the Roaring Fork Valley. HydroSystems*KDI 860 Tabor Street, Suite 200 Lakewood, CO 80401 Jill Bersano, 303.598.5009 .J6 Hyd ry Syste m S jillb@hydrosystemskdi.com hydrosystemskdl.com HydroSystems*KDI has over 180 years of combined experience in the irrigation system construction and design environment in Colorado and the western US. They are uniquely qualified to meet the needs of clients and project owners and HydroSystems•KDI is dedicated to providing a level of service and technical expertise in irrigation system design that is unmatched in the consulting industry. With a staff of 8 irrigation system designers, HydroSystems• KDI utilizes the most current version of AutoCAD for all planning and irrigation design efforts. They also utilize their own irrigation design software that works with AutoCAD, developed and designed for their own internal use, by members of the staff. GPS equipment is utilized for basic spot surveys and GPS located as -built plans. HydroSystems*KDI has been working with DHM for many years and frequently completes design work required to adhere to the water use permitting requirements necessary for permitting in the City of Aspen. STURM CONSULTING. INC. FOODSERMCE DESIGN & PLANNING Sturm Consulting 5838 S. Hudson Place Tulsa, OK 74135 Rocky Sturm, 918.260.0667 rockysturm 1 @cox.net Sturm Consulting: Rocky Sturm, founding principal of Sturm Consulting, Inc., has more than 30 years' experience in commercial foodservice design, planning, and production of construction documents for all sizes and types of commercial facilities: snack bars, concession stands, child care centers, churches, schools, restaurants, country clubs, production facilities, and employee dining facilities. Rocky's involvement begins at program development with owners and architects, and carries through with planning and design of foodservice facilities. All design drawings, construction drawings, and equipment specifications are fully coordinated with the owners, architects, and engineers on the project. Sturm has been providing foodservice consulting for almost three decades and has worked with RDG on over 20 ECE projects in the past decade. City of Aspen #2021-239 - Burlingame Childcare Center l `I i I l I� 1 i t i J� VL { 5.2.A ACKNOWLEDGEMENT OF SCOPE 1) Please summarize/verify your understanding of the scope of services requested in this RFP as well as described in the contract. We understand our scope is to lead a design team alongside the City of Aspen, and it's various agencies/ departments, in the design and engineering of an early childhood education center likely with affordable housing. The project is located in park parcel C of the Burlingame PD, a steep site that currently is under construction to include pathways and retainage structures that effectively sever the site in two. The parcel is located at a visible intersection within the Burlingame development, and it does not have clear access or turn around solutions without creative engineering. We understand our role is to navigate these constraints to create alignment between the residents, Kids First, the Parks department, Community Development, and additional stakeholders like the residents of Aspen in general. Although the PD contemplates a daycare facility on this site, the actual execution of that is not obvious, and it will be our job to navigate these constraints. As this RFP first awards concept and schematic, this alignment will be critical to our team's early success. We understand that beyond alignment we will also be tasked with developing the program with stakeholders as well. With that project alignment and program, we also understand our role is to execute on the project with professional best practices and AIA contract obligations. We understand our role is to be good stewards of public funds, and - as the project advances through later phases, we see our role as a collaborative leader of a project with a diverse stakeholder group. 2) Describe how your firm/team will approach and execute each section of the scope of services and describe how your firm/team can add value to the services requested to create a successful project. We will look to engage with City of Aspen, Kids First and other community partners group in a workshop to review and verify the space program and identify any outstanding items that need further discussion including any changes that have occurred since the RFP release. We invite all stakeholders into the design process as we continue to listen to specific needs, evaluate options using data visualization, understand any strategic partnerships, and develop consistent program goals. At the end of the workshop, a revised program summary will be published. Following initial programming, we will engage the City of Aspen, Kids First and other community partners group in a workshop sessions to review and refine the space program for each building and identify any outstanding items that need further discussion including any changes that have occurred since the programming phase ended. We invite all stakeholders into this program and conceptual process as we continue to listen to specific needs, evaluate options using data visualization, understand any strategic partnerships, and develop consistent program goals. At the end of the workshop, a revised program summary will be published. Based on the approved facility program, the design team will lead a select Owner Design Advisor Group (DAG) through a series of design and budgeting charettes exploring not only architectural design options but also building system design options using Revit Enscape and integrated estimating. 3D images of floor plans and interior spaces will be developed to allow your team to virtually experience the building, and allowing key stakeholders including teachers, community members, and even donors the ability to gain a better understanding of the project. City of Aspen #2021-239 - Burlingame Childcare Center Working closely with project leadership, the team will begin to finalize aesthetic and systems related decisions, with a particular emphasis on the technical aspects of the documents. The use of Revit will build during this phase, providing opportunities for a more detailed evaluation of design and the ability to extract various data to support cost estimating exercises in conjunction with the CM/GC. Integration of technology and equipment needs requirements, and layout will be finalized and coordinated with MEP requirements. Budget and schedule objectives will be reviewed and confirmed with the CM/GC as they prepare the GMP. We will begin this phase with a thorough constructability review involving facilities staff and the CM/GC. Revit and Navisworks will be further employed for interference checks and conflict resolution as we prepare final construction documents for both buildings. Our team uses Revit allowing the opportunity to evaluate issues and conflicts three -dimensionally which is critical when dealing with an existing structure and is equally valuable for new buildings. Budget and schedule objectives will be reviewed and confirmed with City of Aspen and the CM/GC Success begins with a well -coordinated set of construction documents and continues with field personnel that are not only familiar with the project but experienced with construction and the details of early childhood. Our team will oversee the on -site construction administration phase for the project and coordinate directly with City of Aspen. Communication is the key to success as well as a process that holds all parties accountable for performance. Management techniques employed through the process include monthly Owner / Architect / Contractor meetings, job site observations, integrated submittal processing, and quick turnarounds to contractor request for information. Particular attention to close out and commissioning will provide for a smooth transition from construction to operations. PROJECT MANAGEMENT & COORDINATION Building upon the modeling capabilities of Revit, we utilize 3D AND VIRTUAL REALITY VISUALIZATION INTEGRATED INTO OUR DESIGN PROCESSES to assist not only with communicating the aesthetics of the design, but to also assess the functional aspects of design. Owners and team members alike can experience the impact of various aspects of the design including wall heights and window placement as well as overall layout and room configuration. Wall heights, window openings and other design elements can be modified in real time and assessed to achieve the quality of environment that best meets the needs of the client. Programs such as Revit and technologies such as virtual reality have been instrumental in the development of the design and communication with the owner and contractor team. The use of BIM SOFTWARE IS USEFUL IN THE DESIGN AND COORDINATION OF PROJECTS, IMPROVES COMMUNICATION DURING CONSTRUCTION, AND AIDES OUR CLIENTS IN FACILITIES MANAGEMENT. Revit provides an integrated platform for architectural renderings, clash detection, construction specification, and day lighting analysis and energy analysis, as well as the ability to extract material and space quantities for cost estimating and program verification. To maintain quality control among our team, we have implemented a series of project review metrics, team mentoring and ongoing Revit testing procedures. During key milestones in the design process, we utilize Navisworks, a project review software, to perform collision detection on the various building components in each of the discipline models to identify potential conflicts and correct them before construction begins, thus reducing potential questions and cost impacts during construction. Land+Shelter alan R P� The keys to effective quality assurance and cost control procedures are team continuity, a collaborative and interactive process, and a complete documentation quality review. Key project leadership remains active through all project phases. This level of continuity and oversight is important and quite unique. Similarly, team continuity is stressed in project staffing, as new team members are added to the project in a way that minimizes disruption while stressing continuity with the team already in place. We have found that there is no substitute for this level of continuity in the delivery of a quality set of documents. Our team's GOAL OF QUALITY CONTROL IS TO PROVIDE A MEANS TO PREVENT PROBLEMS AND IMPROVE PROJECTS. Part of the process is to collect construction -related feedback that might be useful to other projects or might initiate/change standard specifications or details. We document both the design and construction process using the following methods: • Detailed minutes from all meetings, including Owner -Architect, Owner -Architect -Contractor, Design Team, and Owner -User -Architect are filed and distributed to meeting attendees. • Collaborative, interactive workshops will be digitally documented and distributed to attendees. • Published documentation of major project milestones including programming, schematic design and design development documents. Each milestone includes owner, user and community review where comments and refinements will be tracked and logged. • Publication of cost estimating workshops with Construction Manager and/or Cost Estimator. • Regular field observation visits throughout the construction phase, documented with notes and photographs. Our Quality Assurance Program stresses process and deliverable review by experienced, Principal -level review teams. We implement Quality Control policies and recommendations which may not be absolutely required but are recommended for consideration. We monitor the incorporation of these polices and recommendations through our QC Review process. Technical Document Quality Control review(s) are conducted by a designated Quality Control Reviewer. A primary reviewer reviews the entire project. In addition, mechanical engineering provided by outside consultants is briefly evaluated by the in-house reviewer. Document reviews occur at the end of the Design Development Phase and the end of the Construction Documents. 3) Please also describe what elements of efficiency your firm/team will bring to the project approach in order to help the City of Aspen best utilize funds and make suggestions in each area of the approach on what your firm will do to ensure that the intended outcomes of the project methodology are reached. Please see our responses to 5.1.0 on pages 18-19. City of Aspen #2021-239 - Burlingame Childcare Center In addition, the design of an early childhood facility requires specialized expertise in the unique requirements of early learners. Creating secure and healthy places for young children to learn and grow can have a significant impact on future success as identified from the research outcomes associated with the 1962-67 Perry Preschool Study https://hiQhscape.org/perry-rreschool-project . Neuro development is in full gear at this stage and can be positively and negatively impacted by the environment. Understanding the underpinnings of best practices along with how to incorporate that knowledge into the design of the facility and site, will impact teachers' and students' successes. Efficiencies come from our background: • L+S has 16 years of practice in the community • AFA has 12 years of focus on research -based design for early learning environments • RDG has direct experience on the design of 50+ early learning centers • AFA is an internationally recognized leader in sustainability, safety, and security Our team offers Aspen a knowledge base that fits the place and is steeped in experience and research for creating high performance learning environments w Land Shelter alawl"n -y RD.9•• 5.23 FEE WORKSHEET DocuSign Envelope ID: 8E03A24B-0058-4A5D-818B-F45352DB2D72 BID PROPOSAL FORM PROJECT NO.: 2021-239 BID DATE: December 14, 2021 PROJECT: Burlingame Childcare Center PROPOSAL SUBMITTED BY: Land+Shelter, Inc. BIDDER BIDDER'S BID PROPOSAL TO: The Governing Body of the City of Aspen, Colorado 40, CITY OF ASPEN The undersigned responsible bidder declares and stipulates that this proposal is made in good faith, without collusion or connection with any other person or persons bidding for the same item, and that it is made in pursuance of and subject to all the terms and conditions of the advertisement for bid, the invitation to bid and request for bid, all the requirements of the bid documents including the specifications for this bid, all of which have been read and examined prior to signature. The bidder agrees to keep this bid open for Six& (b()) cottsecutive caleirrlrao' day.v from the date of bid opening. The City of Aspen reserves the right to make the award on the basis of the bid deemed most favorable to the City, to waive any informalities or to reject any or all bids. By signing this document, Bidder certifies and represents that at this time: (i) Professional shall confirm the employment eligibility of all employees who are newly hired for employment in the United States; and (ii) Professional has participated or attempted to participate in the Basic Pilot Program in order to verify that it does not employ illegal aliens. I hereby acknowledge receipt of ADDENDUM(s) numbered BPI-971.doc *Bpi through 2 Page 1 AK Contractor's Initials 41 City of Aspen #2021-239 - Burlingame Childcare Center DocuSign Envelope ID: BE03A24B-0058-4A5D-818B-F45352DB2D72 Description Description ofltem(s) to Be Purchased Quantity Cost per Part 1: Conceptual/Schematic Design .................................................... $213,283.00 Part 2: Support for the Land Use Application and review process.......... $122,779.00 Part 3: Design Development................................................................... $241,553.00 Part 4: Approval Documents Recordation support .................................. $30,268.00 Part 5: Construction Documents............................................................. $291,671.00 Part 6: Support for the Building Permit Application Process ................... $119,593.00 Part 7: Construction Administration......................................................... $227,016.00 Part 8: Project Closeout and Warranty Support ...................................... $49,097.00 values include 3mycipated cost of reimbursable expenses, refer to fee worksheet for detail Total Total Bid in Numbers: $1,295,260.00 Total Bid in Words: One million two hundred ninety-five thousand two hundred sixty dollars and no cents. I acknowledge that in submitting this bid it is understood that the right to reject any and all bids has been reserved by the owner. Authorized Officer: Andreaa,Korber, AIA'' Full name signature: Company address: Land+Shelter, Inc. 16 N 4th Street, Carbondale, CO 81623 Telephone number: 970.963.0201 Email: andi@landandshelter.com Attested by: Christine Kin BP1-971.doc 'BP1 , Title: Principal Page 2 AK Contractor's Initials Land+Shelter alanford . -.ra1-1 -, ..._.- nnru irr_ 5.2.0 DETAILED SCHEDULE We believe in delivering projects on time and on budget, as shown in our past performance. Working closely with the project team, an overall schedule will be developed that includes not only construction, but occupancy and start up. Once an overall project schedule is established, we confirm milestones within each phase. In the design phase, milestones are based on percentage of completion. Review sessions with the owner and specific user groups take place at the end of the programming, master planning, schematic design, design development, and construction documents phases, where complete review packages are presented. Our internal schedule is monitored weekly so that our project manager can evaluate manpower requirements during each phase. We have found that breaking the design process into phases, with deadlines at each phase, contributes to scheduling success. During the construction phase we take a proactive approach to controlling the project schedule. At our weekly job -site meeting, construction progress is discussed and evaluated; we work closely with the owner and contractor to identify and alleviate any scheduling problems. We have prepared a detailed schedule of the overall project. An understanding of individual involvement can be evaluated from the listing of assigned hours per phase included on the fee worksheet. We also elaborate in more detailed narrative on the first phase task descriptions as follows: Week One a. Meet with executive committee (in person) and finalize process/schedule for programming and schematic Design b. Confirm available site extents and Review attributes and challenges c. Team to prepare programming support materials d. Begin research phase identifying the key drivers that will inform the project e. Develop draft program reviewing goals/objectives and priorities. Do bench marking comparing with other similar facilities. f. Develop plan for public outreach g. Review budget considerations Week Two a. Distribute questionnaires to identified stakeholders b. Begin developing precedent boards and distribute to the executive committee c. Do conceptual test fits for overall site based on draft program and review site options Week Three a. Compile questionnaire results and review with executive committee (Virtual meeting) b. Identify key stakeholders to interview (if any) c. Refine program based on questionnaire results and executive committee input d. Update conceptual test fits and site options Week Four a. Conduct interviews as identified in week three b. Update program plans and site plans c. Update executive committee (virtual) on findings so far City of Aspen #2021-239 - Burlingame Childcare Center Week Five a. Finalize program b. Develop priorities for the program - must haves and nice to haves c. Update program concept floor and site plans Week Six a. Present concept plans to the executive committee (in person) for review and comment prior to moving into schematic design b. Determine who will participate in schematic design reviews (Design Advisory Group (DAG). Keep DAG to under 12 if possible. Meetings can be open to others for comments at the beginning of each DAG Deliverables - Listed goals and priorities Must haves and nice to haves defined - Target budget - Program spreadsheet Concept floor plan and site plans :=,�.-1-iF!l✓i/-`,TIC :f_S!�-f,i � Week Seven a. DAG # 1 - Meet with DAG to review preliminary concepts and program (3 options) b. Review project goals and priorities - must haves and nice to haves c. Compile feedback from DAG Week Eight a. Team to work on design concepts and preliminary cost data Week Nine a. DAG #2- Present 2 options with preliminary cost data. Narrow down to one scheme for development. Verify priorities - must haves and nice to haves Week Ten a. Team to work on selected design concept and refine preliminary cost data Week Eleven a. DAG #3 - obtain feedback on developed selected scheme and refine as needed. Present alternates based on identified priorities along with ballpark costs Week Twelve a. Present final program plans and preliminary opinion of costs to executive committee Deliverables - Scaled Floor plans and site plan - Elevations - Preliminary sections - Preliminary opinion of costs (optional cost estimator - otherwise provided by architect) Other meetings - to be integrated into the process - timing to be developed working with the executive committee 1. Neighborhood meeting 2. Community meeting 3. Work session with City Council Land +ShelterE alanford ,�- R0.9•• 114 Y 01 W ----------------- --N------------ Y 41 N 3 M m a N c - - - - - - - - - - - -------------------- T E 4.. ----------- - ------------------- a� cu 3 3 __--.-.______- - _ M-__________________ N N O coo --------- - ---------------------------- N N 3 m ------ N------- --------------- ----------------------------- L U f6 N - 3--------------------------------- v - %D ------------------------------------- LU a92 o > +� c N v O N � 3 3 yO c 4J O � �p n 06 v °6 t c m � Q m aci a 0 O E E rl a N O �.% 06 u V) a N w o Y76 N '^ 4-1 conO H O Oto a u a u o o Q a s N L 0 4� c v E u U O C O V O 1 C 0 U nnainaa;uawnSo i - 9da Cf - nnainaa aIeuai:s3 dQ - �- - - ski egad u�isaa- gya �- s�ie�a� ud;sa�r 9tf0 �- s�ie�aa u�isaa-9t/d - 475.M y3 uffisaZi7N- nna.n alEWIIs3 (IS a��aa�ey� u�saa~9b'0 a�aa�eyj u�saa -�da a�;a�aeyj u�sa4-gdp — — — _ doysNioM len}daauOD d04sNJOM weJSOad _ ;W ,euoi;eziue-m - 5.2.D DESIGN PROCESS/QUALITY CONTROL Kicking off with a clear focus on maximizing programmatic goals during the initial executive committee and stakeholder meetings will be essential. This phase of the project will bring site challenges and attributes to the forefront of the planning process in order to ensure project goals, objectives and priorities are clarified in advance. This work involves research, benchmarking with similar facilities and budget review prior to developing public outreach plans. Our goal is to create quality, high- performance learning environments and promote environmental responsibility in architecture. AFA is recognized regionally and internationally as an innovator in daylighting and sustainable design for early childhood educational facilities. The firm's designs enhance the lives of their users and improve occupant performance through the use of natural daylight, focus on indoor air quality and meticulous attention to detail, all while reducing construction and energy costs to the client. The reduction in costs is achieved by the incorporation of recycled and ecologically -friendly materials to produce a low -maintenance environment. This interconnected approach offers direct benefits not only to the occupants and owners of the building, but to the surrounding natural environment. AFA is credited with the first application of displacement ventilation in the State of Colorado and AFA's (this was a Hutton Ford project - AFA's previous firm Hutton Ford Architect's') Aspen Middle School was the first K-12 school within the state to receive LEED NC Gold certification. Quality and cost control begins with a well- defined program statement that responds to the needs of the end user. A project budget based on the program statement will guide cost control throughout the project. All design and construction detailing decisions are evaluated based on the program statement and the project budget. Initial cost estimates are developed on a cost -per -square foot basis categorized by discipline and based on our project team's previous experience in similar types of facilities. While L+S has extensive local quality and cost data from similar size projects, AFA and RDG both have a significant data base of costs associated with,this type of educational project. Even in the midst of a volatile construction market, we have consistently delivered projects on time and on budget. ■' �w � � L y�.J City of Aspen #2021-239 - Burlingame Childcare Center We will negotiate with consultants prior to submitting our proposed fee, utilizing years of experience with our proposed consultants to bring the best value. Our consultants have been fee competitive over the many years we have worked with them. We believe that the early development of a detailed cost model is key. The comprehensive thought that goes into this cost model allows informed choices later on, when cost adjustments to the design are made to keep the project on budget. Additionally, cost review and adjustment happens in each phase of design, starting in schematic with a full cost estimate, and value engineering at the end of schematic and design development. With this approach, prior to the completion of construction documents the budget has been checked and the design adjusted at least twice to meet the budget goals. During construction, we continue to monitor the budget by reviewing change order requests, payment requests and other costs of the project. As design proceeds, construction materials, systems, and finishes are selected, and the cost estimates become more refined and detailed. Our engineering and design specialists are consulted early on for input relative to the life -cycle costs of various systems. The design team's experience in this project type is essential for realistic and achievable project budgets during the early programming and master -planning phases. During all phases of design, we monitor building areas, building systems and finishes along with their associated material and installation costs. Throughout the process we believe in the use of a total project cost model and not just a construction cost model. Project costs include such items as furniture, equipment and soft costs. Beyond monitoring budget compliance throughout the production phase, we will incorporate other strategies to bring efficiency to the design, such as the following: • Simple structural concepts • Innovative use of inexpensive yet long-lasting materials • Cost modeling and adjustment at each phase • Program verification at each phase • Quality control for a tight drawing set • Proactive communication during construction - use of BIM • Weekly Consultant coordination meeting • Exploiting the strengths of Revit to employ clash detection capabilities • Engagement of the facilities management staff to assess experience with various building systems to assure continuity of systems with corporate guidelines and preferences. • Meeting minutes are prepared and posted electronically after meetings r,- alan-�erd it �% Land+Shelte RD. 5.2.E ADDITIONAL REQUIREMENTS 1) The City of Aspen requires that the selected firm/teamwork as part of the Design team to develop an efficient, sustainable design that exists in harmony with its surrounding environment and shall meet the functional and constructability requirements of a properly completed project. Sustainable design should address occupant and environmental health first. Providing healthy indoor environments is fundamental to our approach. See our included case study as an example. Building and site solutions should begin with passive strategies and add active systems such as PV arrays to supplement the remaining loads. Site solutions should be regenerative in nature and should integrate the site and building improvements into the natural setting utilizing topography, flora and fauna, wind and solar as partners in the design. The design team understands local architectural vernacular (building materials, forms and massing) and is composed of designers based in the Roaring Fork Valley. Our portfolio of work is high alpine architecture. It is what we do. We will utilize this experience throughout the design process to create a contextual based solution. Designing with locally available materials and trades will further enhance the connection to place. 2) The design team is expected to support the construction cost estimating effort as needed with the General Contractor, Owner's Agent and Commissioning Agent throughout the design process. Please see 5.2.D for our detailed response to careful cost control throughout the project. 3) During each phase of the design process, the design team will be responsible for presenting the project design to City of Aspen stakeholder groups and Aspen City Council. The intent of these stakeholder sessions will be to provide updates and to receive (and to incorporate to the extent possible within the City's goals and objectives) feedback about the project's design. Specify in your proposal what level of sketches, renderings, graphics or modeling your proposal includes at each phase and describe how each will be sufficient for presentation at each phase. Stakeholder presentations will be organized and messaged by PRS, and our team stands behind their many successful past collaborations with Aspen to execute on this aspect of the scope. For graphics, our typical sequencing of materials includes photos and plans of example finished projects at the start, then we move into rough massing using SketchUp and hand drawing for conceptual feedback. As we progress, we develop the SketchUp model to include more refinement, so we can present more and more realistic representations and gather a refined level of commentary. Near the conclusion of design we create flyover rendered video utilizing Lumion. This tool provides us with the graphics to make sure stakeholders are all understanding the proposal clearly and precisely, using geographically correct sun positioning. '' City of Aspen #2021-239 - Burlingame Childcare Center 4) The design team will be responsible, along with the Contractor at Risk and Owner's Agent, for presenting documentation that supports the Contractor's GMP bid for the project to Aspen City Council. Roughly 50% of the architectural team experience has been in a CM/GC construction delivery approach. The success of any project depends on relationships grounded in trust and communication. With a CM/GC approach we have the opportunity to build the seeds of success early and often advocate for beginning the process with all parties participating in a partnering session to establish the groundwork for a successful project. Engaging all members of the Design/Engineering/Contractor team early in evaluating building systems and envelope options that take into account our current supply chain challenges and construction durations will be important. Integrating all team members' expertise in decisions surrounding documentation and QA/ QC at each phase of the project will help to provide a solution that meets the budget and reduces change orders. J Land+Shelter alani _ 1 RD.9•• 5) Your firm should assume general responsibility for all aspects of sustainable design. AFA in conjunction with Group 14 will take responsibility for creating solutions that will provide the best long term value consistent with the principles of sustainability as discussed in 5.2.1 E item 1. Group 14 will provide energy and daylight modeling data beginning at the earliest stages of design. The design team will then vet that information with the client and contractor presenting options for consideration. The options will show a range of approaches that address the established project goals along with budget implications for each options. Pros and cons of each approach will be discussed to further inform the preferred solution. Alan Ford of AFA, grounded in his research for the book he authored Designing the Sustainable School", brings a broad and seasoned perspective on sustainability to the Burlingame Childcare Center project. Andi Korber, principal in charge of L+S and record architect, practices local sustainable design on the ground in the Roaring Fork Valley. Andi brings that deep local community relationship to sustainability to this team. Her recent projects all review and evaluate all electric, net zero design. The goal is both achievable and financially viable. Andi sits on the CORE committee that awards the annual CORE Udall grants. She has reviewed applicants for these awards for the past 5 years, and understands the evolution of sustainable design success locally - and what it means to be a leader in that field. Andi was also a member of the local committee of architects and energy modelers selected by Brian Pawl to update the Pitkin County building whole -building energy use codes in 2019. 6) The selected firm will be required to execute and perform work subject to the attached AIA B 132 form of agreement between the Owner and Architect and the AIA A201- 2007 General Conditions. Please make the necessary arrangements with your legal and insurance teams to accommodate this request. The contract documents included provide a working framework for the overall project approach and should be considered part of the scope of work required by this RFP. We appreciate and understand this contract framework and accept this as a project requirement. ;C) City of Aspen #2021-239 - Burlingame Childcare Center a-� ! � � III ■��' a logo ;4 f III, I ffli� it �I m fA= �.. .; aLpop— F;,.. f-k,-P r. 1r 4. _ ■vi r � a; ■�� err �`. .� �r � �r'Lw ~ ,e. ■ l ,. r�r:�� in o � a. ,w • �i i ij 4k i+ C F�r r 4■ i" Wagon Wheel + ° i \ J At a a ■ ASCENDIGO RANCH GARFIELD COUNTY, COLORADO 2020 ASCENDIGO RANCH Garfield County, Colorado Client: Ascendigo Autism Services Project Completion: Landuse Proposal Project Size: 45,500 S.F. Project Budget: TBD Owner Contact: Dan Richardson, Ascendigo Autism Services 970.379.3414 Design Architect: Land+Shelter Architect of Record: Land+Shelter GC: Ken Janckila, Janckila Construction 970.927.3143 Ascendigo Ranch is a proposed educational facility designed for people in the Autism spectrum located in Missouri Heights of Garfield County. The 126+ acre rural property provides educational, administrative, dining, living & equestrian facilities for students & educators. The site design groups the buildings to the edges of site and preserves the historically irrigated fields in the heart of the site. Wayfinding, safety & ease of access for the users were the drivers for how the buildings are laid out and interconnected, All decisions were carefully viewed through the lens of designing for individuals in the Autism spectrum. 1 a 7 Item umRwvlLLS Eowu wuu nln sru.D tt+*cires'w qv— v.,..�.:eooEs cc:euennDM W +t. nWC w •. —115 CONCEPTUAL ARCHITECTURE MATERIALS 4 5 6 ACC.- 9 I-- wrnrs 1KR0"$MMS MS,S AM[ At TAMS 'O�GVl6 GCW.T eV5+l0 CC:v VCA+lD �.ow scuus ••nelomrto u,er.! l EElv.V+ :CvcM15 SCv�lr•4 1c 11-1 I hlD 10 6 vun•.o l oe Dave BVON3E E�NiYI Q C7 LN The architecture is in harmony with the physical characteristics of Missouri Heights in their overall scale, in their shapes, and in their materials. The building materials are selected to represent the natural palette of the site. We used familiar materials and have specified them to match photographs of the natural colors of the area so the sages, wheats, and rust tones of the area are reflected in the exterior palette of the ranch. W THE JOURNEY REGIONAL ANIMAL SHELTER, BOARDING FACILITY & VETRINARY CLINIC HOME RIFLE, COLORADO JOURNEY HOME ANIMAL CARE CENTER Rifle, Colorado Client: Rifle Animal Shelter Board Project Completion: In Development Project Size: 12,000 S.F. Project Budget: $1.7 M Owner Contact: Heather Grant, Executive Director 970.625.8808 Design Architect: Land+Shelter Architect of Record: Land+Shelter GC: Jeff & Katie Parrington, Tally Ho Construction, 970.625.0208 Program includes adoption housing & veterinary clinic. SCOPE OF SERVICES Working with the animal shelters executive director, Land+Shelter created an efficient program for an expansion and move of Rifle's animal shelter. The new shelter creates a sense of motion, a journey that's about uncaging, bars opening up for the transition from shelter to forever home. The Journey Home. Afternoon light flows through a linear sunscreen while inexpensive linear pendant lighting echos the pattern. This entry design for the animal shelter and vet clinic in Rifle is working light for its inherent quality of movement as the name suggests. Land+Shelter has been working on the capital campaign alongside the shelter staff and board in support of this non-profit project. CLINIC SHELTER SUPPORTS" SERVICES J �J ADOPTION 0 DOGS ir r GARFIELD COUNTY EDUCATION CENTER RIFLE, COLORADO 2020 GARFIELD COUNTY EDUCATION CENTER Rifle, Colorado Client: Board of County Commissioners of Garfield County Project Completion: In Development Project Size: 12,000 S.F. Project Budget: $2.7 M Owner Contact: Carla Farrand, CSU 970.625.3969 Design Architect: Land+Shelter Architect of Record: Land+Shelter GC: TBD SCOPE OF SERVICES This net -zero energy, adaptive reuse project transforms a feed warehouse into a makerspace and flexible 4H education facility. Added insulation, a rooftop solar electric array, and all electric HVAC systems makes this future education center a model for energy use with an education purpose thraugh and through. The Garfield County Education Center will house the Western Colorado 4H club along with classrooms for Colorado State University extension programs, and Garfield County fairgrounds. The program supports STEAM education (science, technology, engineering, art, math) with spaces dedicated to education in: archery, woodshop/metal shop, sewing, cooking, gardening, food safety, and robotics. RANGE/SHOP/EXPO L LOBBY �-- OFFICES KITCHEN ` & SEWING CLASSROOMS j BLBALLR0-O-MLOBBY t MAIN LEVEL UPPER LEVEL r� 4 �YC RRPRIR �B fl54 p4. 5EtMI6-11[SE RFS[OERIIAS 2l,it00 19•y SF C"SET 4T 9,301; 5F Sa 11R COW. NER OILL RETAIL 11.000 SF r ULLT OFFSET V 7.000 SF SWAB J - ISM 1500 1150 S00 I I CUSTOM SOLAR )LWhlR 2) MAIN STREET CARBONDALE, COLORADO MULTI -FAMILY MIXED USE Carbondale, Colorado Client: Eastwood Developments, Inc. Project Completion: currently in SD Project Size: 50,000 S.F. Project Budget: $20 M Owner Contact: Rob Cairncross, Eastwood Developments, Inc., 970.618.6722 Design Architect: 359 Design Architect of Record: Land+Shelter GC: TBD SCOPE OF SERVICES Land+Shelter in partnership with 359 Design have teamed on a mixed use multi -family development in downtown Carbondale. The 22 condominium project combines two floors of residential over ground floor commercial space and underground alley -access parking. L+S is serving as the local and record architect for the project which is currently in Schematic Design. We are studying the impacts of factory built units and cautiously optimistic that this will serve our project well, especially in terms of overall schedule. We are enjoying a successful project start with excellent dialogue with the Town and look forward to fitting a new project into a mature downtown landscape. The L+S/359 building will sit at the gateway to the downtown core, and signify arrival to the town core for visitors and locals alike. 7'r p TRUE NATURE HEALING ARTS CARBONDALE, COLORADO 2018 TRUE NATURE HEALING ARTS Carbondale, Colorado Project Completion: 2018 Contact : Eaden Shantay, Owner 970.361.2195 Project Size: 4,000 S.F. Project Budget: $6 Mil Design Architect: Lea Sisson Architect Architect of Record: Land + Shelter GC: Andy Braudis, Terralink Structures, 970.379.3741 SCOPE OF SERVICES Land+Shelter was the record architect for this new construction project completed in 2018. We provided construction drawings and construction administration for a complex, fast - tracked project. Our services were delivered under the tightest of constraints and with the highest level of detail. This complex program included four spa rooms, a locker room, events space, and o tea room/lobby space. The entire facility required state of the art acoustics. Land+Shelter partnered with Lea Sisson to execute a complex underground commercial building whose form is based on a Hopi Indian prayer structure. The "Kiva" is a future yoga teacher retreat space which will also offer lectures and performances. The Kiva Structure is surrounded by a spa with four luxury treatment rooms. These amenities sit into a hillside within a garden landscape. ACES / ROCK BOTTOM RANCH RENOVATION BASALT, COLORADO ACES ROCK BOTTOM RANCH EDUCATION CENTER Basalt, Colorado Size: 2,000sf Date Completed: 2017 Cost: $150,000 Owner Contact: Christy Mahon, Devel- opment Director 970.309.6262 Design Architect: Land+Shelter Architect Of Record: Land+Shelter GC: N/A SCOPE OF SERVICES Land+Shelter proudly donated pro-bono, time and design documents to Aspen Center for Environmental Studies (ACES) in order for them to begin fundraising for needed renovations to their other property, Rock Bottom Ranch (RBR). Both ACES and RBR educate the community about being responsible environment stewards. The RBR Visitor Center now has a noticeable visitor entrances, redesigned staff offices, public bathrooms and reception desk. Reclaimed materials and other natural elements that are represented on the property were incorporated into the new design aesthetics. ADAPTIVE REUSE OF ELEMENTARY SCHOOL INTO NON PROFIT CENTER CARBONDALE, COLORADO Owner Contact: Colin Laird, Executive Director, Third Street Center 970.309.2053 Design Architect: Land+Shelter and Energy & Sustainable Design Architect Of Record: Energy & Sustainable Design GC: Hans Raaflaub (Retired) B&H General Contractors 970.945.0102 NON-PROFIT CENTER Carbondale, Colorado Project Completion: 2009 Client: Third Street Center Board & Town of Carbondale Project Size: 45,000 S.F. Project Budget: $2,800,000 The Third Street Center is the adaptive reuse of the former Carbondale Elementary School and its transformation into an affordable, stable center for non -profits. SCOPE OF SERVICES As lead developer on the project, Land+Shelter brought together the Roaring Fork School District, The Town of Carbondale, and dozens of local non -profits in an effort to create a much -needed affordable building for non -profits. In addition to our financial and planning role, Land+Shelter became the Owner's Rep for the Third Street Center board, overseeing all contracts from inception to completion. L+S was also specifically responsible for the solar electric systems, the asbestos abatement project, and aspects of the interior design critical to transform a the mid-century school into a vibrant new multi -tenant non-profit center. alas -%r-#4 ARCHITECTS Mapleton Early Childhood Center Alan Ford Architects + RTA Architects Alan Ford Architects partnered with RTA Architects for the Mapleton Early Childhood Center project. This project converted the historic Mapleton Elementary School, which closed in 2003, into a new early childhood learning center. This new facility serves infants up to 5-year olds. The project scope included a new entry and lobby addition, complete systems replacements and interior renovation_ Masonry repair to the historic exterior and a new Hydronic HVAC system that was integrated into the existing building was also included in the project scope. The project team focused on designing to the 21 st century while maintaining the integrity of the historical budding. The Mapleton Early Childhood Center has been the recipient of 9 design awards since its construction. Boulder Valley School District Renovation / Addition July 2013 21,000 SF 160 Students $5,200,000 Principal in Charge of Design Designed to LEED Gold Glen Segrue, Project Manager Boulder Valley School District t 720.561.5794 glen.segrue@bvsd.org Will Valkner, Preconstruction Manager (now with JHL Consructors) Adolfson & Peterson Construction t 303.741.61 16 • Restoration of a historic 132 year old former neighborhood elementary school that had fallen into disrepair and revitalized with a renewed "sense of place" serving the local and broader community. • Project became a catalyst to create processes and establish best practices for designing, developing and managing high-performance learning environments for Early Childhood Education. The project ultimately led to the creation of the international ECE Design Conference to expand the knowledge base for designing for the whole child and recognition of the critical social and neural development ages 0-5. • Energy efficient systems, extensive interior restoration, and ADA and technology upgrades can support up to 128 students throughout Boulder Valley School District. • The project received recognition in the form of 9 significant design awards both at the local and national level in the categories of learning environment, historic preservation, and design and construction. rNQ 9 CCiC[iCttct�u••,••.. alan ARCHITECTS Stanley OPENair Academy Alan Ford Architects AFA was selected to design an early childhood education center that would serve up t❑ 100 students ages six weeks to five years old. The design was intended to give teachers and students to have a blank slate, allowing them to have a voice in shaping their learning environment. Transparency between spaces was used to provide connected learning experiences. Tubular devices were used t❑ supplement natural daylighting into the interior of the building. Clifton-Eversley Tenant Finish November 2016 8,000 SF 1 10 Students $750,000 Programming and Principal in Charge of Design Heather Eversley, Co -Founder OPENair Academy t 303.717.3262 heather@clifton-eversley.com Chris Haugen, President White Construction Group t 303.688.6924 Ext. 4741 b-.1 • Integration of an Early Childhood Education program into a former aviation building that was being transformed into a food -centric community hub. • Project was a template for ECE best practices development and serves up to 100 students. The client and the architect were founders of the ECE Design Conference and applied in this project many of the principles garnered from five years of research. • Learning spaces are transformable to allow the users (teachers and students) to change/ modify space over time through art, reconfiguration, and project based exercises allowing them to have a voice in shaping their learning environment. * The design incorporates the use of water, light and manipulative's as a canvas for expression and cognitive development to support each student's creativity. ■ To overcome deep bay configuration, unique tubular daylighting devices were utilized to distribute natural light throughout the facility. • Transparency between spaces, and maker space gives teachers and students a sense of community. alan�-r ARCHITECTS Blue Spruce Habitat for Humanity Alan Ford Architects AIA Colorado, COTE and Housing subcommittees collaborated to create a design competition in partnership with the Blue Spruce Chapter of Habitat for Humanity in Evergreen, CO. As the winning design and as the 2013 AIA National Convention Host Chapter Legacy Project, the Habitat for Humanity project has demonstrated to thousands of people that high-performance, high - quality design is important and beneficial, particularly for the under -served. Blue Spruce Habitat For Humanity New Construction 2014 $306,000 2,500 SF Collaborative Design Team • Alan Ford (AFA) • Kathy Ford (AFA) • Matt Weaver (AFA) • Molly Blakely (Independent) Kathleen O'Leary, Executive Director Blue Spruce Habitat for Humanity t 303.674.1 127 ext. 1 koleary@bluesprucehabitat.org Tony Cingoranelli Adolfson & Peterson Construction t 303.363.7101 • 2017 AIA Colorado- Top AIA Award • 2017 AIA Denver- Honorable Mention • 2014 AIA Architect's Choice Award • 2013 AIA National Convention Host Chapter Legacy Project • 2011 AIA/Habitat for Humanity Design Competition, Winning Entry fir Three unique modules allow the design to be adapted for use on different sites with minimal redesign. I -- Movement Module Service Module Living Module • The design utilizes a super insulated envelope to cope with a cold micro -climate on a north facing mountain slope. • A movement module, service module, and living module are arranged to maximize useful floor area and minimize total volume. • Shed form, massing, and material selection work together to bring light and views into the home and are consistent with the Colorado mountain vernacular. • Because of its climatically harsh location, durable and fire-resistant materials have been selected including a metal roof and fiber -cement board siding. Sustainable Features { - `_;Ian Roof I nlr -g - S-ar Ocher ai_pli.ances Hvdrunic ,� / itll;O tE'E 'r_irc^3ie��tU 1"0 rF� - SIP Wall ::::;; Ai r •.c� -— AIL;{� r7 d`�S'i(.)f f, „_tri•,. ,. sjld�. Bull, in'.p t"Ir1 1;115�rir,.-- �, ;`V .3 t'. L, Iis r{T'!17. Allow r' SIP walls and roofs enable an air -tight and highly insulated envelope. WILOINGCONLS VAS I L'1 U, L11J01.1 t;U'. `-I VIj': fr.IrllT FIrf:Rl;r;el itl;p •ijf Fa; -'I tf: aATNR'1f:A1 =-1 H r1 ilF�vr_! t it [:N..k.- If. NSFI t TOTAL PER ON fT E1U GE s � - II 1G HERS Index ISO ,40 yj] Typical Existing Resale Home 120 ® ,10 a1�C III 7 Typical New Construction U) 90 c <2 EPA Energy Star � g0 70 rn W 60 c W N 60 AIA Legacy Duplex 20 AIA Legacy Duplex W/ Designed Renewable 1° Energy Sources Net Zero Home The duplex earned a Home Energy Rating System (HERS) score of 31, meaning it uses 31 percent of the energy of a similar sized home built to meet minimum energy code requirements. The home is photovoltaic and solar -thermal ready - once installed, the home is expected to achieve a HERS score of 15. BUILDING IONES 1 LNII!, .N! 11::1 I H r,rULIS k_IUI.18 v,UW• ` �1'UALI•I _ UVIII_11GO, .I;U vjl G AV: l I.b_L!'IJLI 11 N1, I nr1 y L,1 ' :'Iw L:ININ�'?1Jl' 11!NS' C iw/GL IG`it L•Gr4:Icr 7 1 nrt�rN ilf,�•15rTQ7 PFR UNR 610 BSF" TOTAL 1 S10 GBF 1 7 a y S � I �v 4 FOUNDER - ECE DESIGN CONFERENCE 2012-2018 f"h!Ai,PiroFr�,.+r *''' e-rTTING IT RIGH11 In 2008 Alan Ford, while working on the design of an early childhood facility was surprised by the lack of resources available to support research based design decisions for ECE facilities. Using his background in design conference planning, he began the process of creating an event solely focused on promoting best practices for designing early childhood facilities. The first conference took place in 2012 followed by ones in 2013, 2014, 2016, and 2018. The event is curated around bringing together a blend of scientists, medical doctors, researchers, educators and practicing architects/landscape architects/ interior designers. Speakers have come from the mainly from the United States but have also traveled from as far away as Australia, Germany, and Denmark, for the purpose of sharing knowledge and fostering the exchange of ideas on how to design high performance learning environments for early learners. The associated website http,//eorlychildhooddesign.com/ provides attendees with content from the events. Also on the website is the latest in ECE news, related videos and research papers created solely for early childhood designs knowledge sharing mission. The conference attracts facility managers, ECE owner and operators, educators, and designers nationally and internationally. It remains the only enduring forum specifically focused on understanding the relationship of optimized learning and the environment where learning occurs. sed research, Jht Ic in early teaming environments, white highiighnng ,r,e besl research - informed early Chitanood fociiaiie;. Alan tics acquired a unique and holistic understanding of what to do and not to do in early learnir Through his own work designing early childhood facilities Alan has found innovative ways to apply this in depth knowledge. LESSONS LEARNED • Understanding the role of light wave length on a child's health • The importance of the environment supporting the teacher's needs — happy teachers are more equipped to nurture and engage students in a positive manner • The design needs to allow and support parent engagement. • Positive socialization, nurture and a healthy environment can impact neuro development and brain size • The need for multi -sensory learning • Biophilia and the role of nature in learning and cognitive development • The mind -body connection and the role of movement in fostering overall health and proper brain function for learning • The need for play and the benefits of risk taking in play ■ Room color, pattern and acoustics do matter. Sensory overload causes stress and inhibits learning and development. ■ According to Brain scientist Dr. John Medina, color does influence mood and there is an innate need for opportunities for social engagement and refuge • Design needs to support the pedagogy. • Opportunities for engaging the environment as the "Third Teacher" • How to address the unique requirements of safety and security in ECE Centers Photo of Alan Ford during ECE Conference proceedings at the 2016 event. alan �nrd ARCHITECTS + ECE DESIGN BEST PRACTICES - CASE STUDY a la n 1 Rog � - iEVIDENCE BASED PROGFt,4MMiNG AND DESIGN ARCHITECTS • The Alan Ford Architects' team is passionate about keeping up-to-date with the latest research in brain based, whole child, movement and other 21 st century learning principles. In doing so, AFA provides clients with the most informed design strategies. In 2012, Alan Ford led the first ever conference solely focused on promoting best practices for designing early childhood facilities. That conference was the catalyst for this ECE Design for a confidential client. Project design goals included: early childhood education and day care services for 114 students (infant through school age) to support campus faculty and staff, indoor and outdoor learning environments, sustainability goals of LEED Gold and Net Zero Energy consumption, and the opportunity to connect to the community at large. Super Insulated Envelope: To minimize energy loss Sun Shading/Covered Outdoor Play: - r.xacossba,w (Per childcare regulations plus _ reduces glare for occupants) ---� Vision Windows: Biophilic Design (Connection to Nature) Intelligent Operable Windows: Windows Connecting Inlegraled with Classrooms: mechanical/ventilation Fosters communily and sense of place No Red List Materials: For occupant health mNcern Daylight Harvesting (Daylighting surfaces/wall d ceiling planes) Embedded in Site: To minimize energy loss Radiant Floor System: Allows for thermal comfort Crawl Space: L Displacement veMRation: (V) Allows for plumbing flexibility Conditions the space That children and distribution of displacement and adults occupy. Lower CFM ventilation fosters healthier environment Design focused on utilization of these key best practices to support the project goal!: • Multi -sensory learning spaces - color, pattern and acoustics to minimize stress caused by sensory overload. Use of natural materials and neutral color pallet. Mechanical system operates at a very low sound levels, sound absorbing materials strategically placed. Operable windows to allows sounds of nature within the classroom. • Mind -body connection and how movement fosters overall health and proper brain function for learning. The design incorporates opportunities for movement throughout the building and site and incorporates project based learning inside and out for a comprehensive sensory experience. • Incorporating proper light wave length, color, and by engaging the environment as the "third teacher", to nurture and increase positive socialization for neurc development in students. Daylight harvesting utilizes natural light in a manner that reduces high conlrasl yet allows access to the full spectrum wave lengths to foster circadion health • Design that supports the pedagogy and focuses on biophilia and the role of nature in learning and cognitive development as illustrated by indoor outdoor connections and the development of site based expioratory learning in a natural setting. • Safety and security for the ECE facility within an occupied campus • Student health - displacement ventilation, improved indoor. No red list materials, radiant floor heating for thermal comfort. • Gross motor room and site exploration to foster vestibular development. • Attention to classroom acoustics to reduce stress for teachers and students. • Design should foster socialization and community. Windows classroom to classroom connect students and staff. Places for families to gather. s A • � i i Embedded in Site: 1 Engage building in the conleXt of the site while minimizing energry consumption -ji� Photalaitaic Power: + +�E Demonslrallon Pv, F I array to ' 'all r� ❑ayiight , i T tee ,r � Sun 5hading/Cav&d< •� r:: _ Outdoor Play: ' (Per childcare regulations plus �~ r. reduces glare for occupants) rvr*ment �cimiing i ' NNW IL do, Indoor Learning Evrlrornent No Red List Materials: Foucused on sensoryleamling Daylight Harvesting For occupant health (Daylighting surfaces/wall & ceiling planes) if)t14T1 Windows'. NloptlltbC�6S19n � {ronneCtf : �" �+iflndOWS Co • ► , � IClcijsssbgm t `!asters com Rface !ii l ��I�IIlII1 I Transparency: fS[#volional Awareness tL Daylight Harvesting and Views to Nalural through- out the School- Family Galher,41 rooters community and Sense of place Intelligent Operable Windows: Integrated with mechoni� olJventllalion Security Vestibule: Monitored by staff 1W Solely a s nc wiry H �z ,irl I Views to Natural Envlron- menf throughout the School nunity Play: community and sense of rla_ ECE DESIGN BEST PRACTICES - CASE STUDY • Exploratory Learning Play • Pre-school play adjacent to classroom with age appropriate multi -sensory learning including sound, texture and opportunities for creating and individual expression - gross motor skill development such as balance and movement of all types. • Toddler play area - Similar to pre-K • Infant Play -Focused on sensory learning. Water, sand, texture and limited movement. '••TreYsR -•— . l �� f � •� weu.no � y�U - Pre -School Play alan --I ARCHITECTS • '=•r Infant Play ler Play INFANTS TODDLERS all, &TWOS CAF-g c 3; n4� T7 'jo -i-qk 46w� PRESCHOOLERS it Fes• qs, alan RDg,- ARCHITECTS f LU (-.) — _ _ a C w ca O Q U o =� — o— o CO0��"7 �� -U C/) +� � a) a) cz c cm o cn Q E � cn ; 0 CO a� cn C) U:)c� �r Q CD +� 7 m a �— c U) � -Q c cz c -0 a> o CZ (1) cn co a� co C5- U) '� cn co CZ o c N a) o c 0 0 CD �--� = E a) Cl) c "� i U) CD aT � ' _� E :+-� U U O �' Q O� U ID —0 cza) a� (1) O O U m = O— fl- CD- -0 == T3 U U Q m w U) U) L U) r.. b = E 0 - 6�/ k k o-\ 2 _j 7 CD/ / e g ? U o g/ 1g t g\ - 2 e E y CZ 2 U-J= w � _ 2 LLJ �2 $7/ CD 7 c- 2 % o % m 3 3 _ E CD , 3 ® / 2 = ca- 2 O 2\ cz —cu lU L +� ' Cn �� U aJ CCi Q = O Q. � i O CC$ O w O aJ C O iCD U U }' U -0 CZO U Z O .� a� O CCS 1 U i U s= � ._ cn � U) • CZ O cz +� O � C >, O. E CD- -0 czO O "O -0 U OU }' O }' U O cz ..Q O E 7r w a) �_ O }� }� •� U O �� CD O �_� Q U O .� C cm _O czcz cz i E U U -0 U U .� OU •O O = •i i .� CD �, Q U CZ U E cz : cz � c +� a� CA o > cz p U 0 0_0 •O Q O N a) U CC O C aJ N C U L17 J +U aJ a) +U Q O W U �-+ C7 +� C2 r — .., CD CQ C]J co W C O C O U U L C 03 e6CIO CDU U Q) C >, >, Cp L U p Q M} -� U L F p >, - O) O � -aU Q U C O C E O (1) � i �_ i--� U (I i z U C i U L� U C Cz N O p cw Q� U O Q J L T U CZ cz i CD O>, cd OE UC Q C O N CDCC/J N i CD Ccz CDC — > C O > CD> -6 p L C CDC C L C C r j 1 Q -6 aJ UCIO I O cn O O E E CD- Q ca c� a� w 0 CZ o�� E � m - - -� o �4 E a� o - -� +� -0 o_ a) o +� o u ca o U E a F 0CD o o o o rcz o> L— C- 76 CZ o o m O u a� — E — - — a> >, c CD r- ca c� t o c CD o z U w u c> cz — a—,a-0 u M- cn w I i I p� U C a i--+ U cQ CD CD cm = 0- CD CO cnC CD CD� w • _ E S? � CO r.. O CD-c cz cn L (� o LO """' p U C QU E cn = CD -c a� } c n� Q +--' p L Q� o .r- �J e i 1 Vuuuolyla CIIVtlIup", IV. OCVJhL4o-Vl,JO-YMJU-OIoo-r4JJJLVO4L 1f- C?U}IUH C] .�} Ilk�4 REQUEST FOR PROPOSALS "Iyov CITY OFASPEN Architecture & Engineering Design Team for the Burlingame Childcare Center Project # 2021-239 CITY OF ASPEN, COLORADO City of Aspen 130 South Galena Street Aspen, CO 81611 (970) 920-5000 www.cityofaspen.com Date Issued: October 22, 2021 Proposals Due: December 14, 2021, 2:OOPM MDT UUuuolylI CIIVCIUpC IU. 0CU0hL4D-Ul+J0- P%JU-O I OD-r'FJJJLUDLU 1 L a�'n k ox CITY OF ASPEN REQUEST FOR PROPOSALS Sealed proposals will be received at the City of Aspen Purchasing office, through the Bidnet Direct website (www.bidnetdirect.com) until 2:00pm (MDT), December 14, 2021, at which time the proposals will be opened and reviewed, for the following City of Aspen project: 2021-239 Architecture & Engineering Design Team for the Burlingame Childcare Center. The City of Aspen ("City") is in the initial steps of a design process on city owned property within the Burlingame Ranch subdivision to develop a childcare center ("Project"). This Request for Proposals ("RFP") seeks proposals for Architecture & Engineering ("A&E") design team services in developing the Project. As currently conceived, the Project includes but may not be limited to development of a childcare center with some on -site housing. Design considerations include program development and sensitivities related to density, height and massing along with additional characteristics such as landscape, traffic and parking, neighborhood character, noise and air quality, energy efficiency & sustainability. There will be a mandatoryvirtual pre -bid conference at 10AM (MST) on Tuesday, November 16, 2021. Complete RFP documents are available to download at www.bidnetdirect.com. Candidates must be registered to view the bid packages. There is no fee to register. Call 1-800-835-4603 if you need assistance registering. Proposals must be submitted by uploading to the Bidnet Direct website. The City reserves the right to reject any or all Proposals or accept what is, in its judgment, the Proposal which is in the City's best interest. The City further reserves the right, in the best interests of the City, to accept a late submittal or to waive any technical defects or irregularities in any and all Proposals submitted. Pursuant to the Colorado Open Records Act, C.R.S. Section 24-72-200.1(CORA), any and all of the documents that are submitted to the City of Aspen may be deemed public records subject to examination and inspection by third parties. The City of Aspen reserves the right, at its sole discretion, to release for inspection or copying any document, plan, specification, proposal or other writing submitted pursuant to this request. Candidates should identify any portion of their proposals which they consider confidential. Discussion may be conducted with responsible Offerors who submit Proposals determined to be reasonably susceptible to be selected for award for purpose of clarification to assure full understanding of, and responsiveness to the solicitation requirements. In addition to price, the evaluation criteria set forth in the RFP shall be considered in judging which Proposal is in the best interests of the City. City of Aspen 130 South Galena Street Aspen, CO 81611 Burlingame Childcare Center Request for Proposals — Architect/Design Services Page 1 uuuuolyii r-iiveiuNa iu. or-vJM4L• D-v%.L)o-+MVLJ-o ioo-rw;joL;cvocuic CITY OFASPEN Table of Contents 1.0 Introduction s 1.1 Invitation to Proposers 3 1.2 Project Summary 3 1.3 Project Approach 3 2.0 Project Description 5 2.1 Process Summary 5 2.2 Project Site 5 2.3 Programming Expectations 6 2.4 Technical Studies 7 3.0 Scope of Services 7 3.1 Part 1: Conceptual/Schematic Design 7 3.2 Part 2: Support for the Land Use Application and review process 8 3.4 Part 4: Approval Documents - recordation support 9 3.5 Part 5: Construction Documents 9 3.6 Part 6: Support for the Building Permit Application Process 9 3.7 Part 7: Construction Administration 9 3.8 Part 8: Project Closeout and Warranty Support 9 4.0 RFP Process �1 4.1 Questions 10 4.2 RFP Schedule 10 4.3 Proposal Submission and Format 10 4.4 Evaluation Criteria 10 5.0 Proposal Requirements 10 5.1 Qualifications 10 5.2 Proposal Elements 11 5.3 Proposal Format 13 6.0 Owner's Language 13 6.1 Interests of the City of Aspen 13 6.2 Insurance Requirements 13 7.0 Exhibits 13 7.1 Contracts 13 Burlingame Childcare Center Request for Proposals - Architect/Design Services Page 2 UUUUJIIJ.II CI IVCIUpC 1U. OCVJML'FD-VI+UO�iMU U-O I OO-rYUJULUDLU/L ,N��r�4� CITY OFASPEN 1.0 Introduction The purpose of this Request for Proposals (RFP) document is to solicit complete architectural design services proposals from qualified firms or teams for the Burlingame Day Care Center project. 1.1 Invitation to Proposers Sealed proposals will be received at the City of Aspen Purchasing office, through the Bidnet Direct website (www.bidnetdirect.com) until 2:00pm (MDT), Tuesday, December 14, 2021, at which time the proposals will be opened and reviewed, for the following City of Aspen project: BURLINGAME CHILDCARE CENTER To allow the City of Aspen (Owner) to fully understand your firm or team's intended approach to the project, carefully prepare a response based on the information required in this Request for Proposals. 1.2 Project Summary The City of Aspen desires to develop a mixed -use project on vacant property it owns within the Burlingame Subdivision/Planned Development. The programming for the site will include development of a childcare center with appropriate indoor and outdoor spaces, well designed multi -modal circulation for the site as well as some on -site housing intended for employees of the childcare center. The initial contract award for this RFP will include only Part 1 as categorized below and described in Section 3.0 Scope of Services. Additional portions of scope are anticipated to be added as additional services as the project moves forward. Part 1: Conceptual/Schematic Design (initial contract award) Part 2: Support for the Land Use Application and review process (future add services) Part 3: Design Development (future add services) Part 4: Approval Documents recordation support (future add services) Part 5: Construction Documents (future add services) Part 6: Support for the Building Permit Application Process (future add services) Part 7: Construction Administration (future add services) Part 8: Project Closeout and Warranty Support (future add services) 1.3 Project Approach Design and construct a project that fits the current character of the neighborhood and greater Aspen community, is sustainable and energy efficient (potentially Net Zero), allows for the building to be constructed in a timely manner, and proactively encourages multimodal access while minimizing potential vehicular impacts to the site and greater neighborhood. 1.3.A Objectives. Proposers shall include on their team firms or individuals qualified and licensed in the State of Colorado, and significantly familiar with City of Aspen building codes, amendments, and processes, to provide professional design or consulting services in the following disciplines: The design of childcare facilities Burlingame Childcare Center Request for Proposals — Architect/Design Services Page 3 UUI:U01Y1I CI IVCIUPW IL). OCUJHL4O-UlJJ0-4M0U-0 I 00-rY:7JJLUDLLI/L ��.40 CITY OFASPEN ■ Interior design for finishes • HVAC and mechanical engineering • Construction cost estimation • Mountain design experience • Structural engineering • Green communities standards and CORE guidelines • Parking/traffic consulting • Financial operational assessment • Project scheduling 1.3.6 Collaborative Project Delivery. The City will pursue a collaborative project development team. The early formation of the group provides an open and collaborative process involving input from all parties — designers understand the ramifications of decisions when they are made, decisions are not made solely on a first -cost basis, time value design (estimated budgeting) allows for cost feedback and early total project cost commitments. The values we are looking for on this team are as follows: • Mutual respect and trust ■ Mutual benefit and reward • Collaborative innovation and decision making • Early involvement of key participants ■ Early goal definition • Comprehensive Planning ■ Open communication • Appropriate technology • Organization and leadership The collaborative project team will consist of the following: ■ City of Aspen staff • Architect/engineer design team • General contractor will be brought on board at appropriate time • Owners' representative will be brought on board at appropriate time by the city • Commissioning agent 1.3.0 Anticipated Schedule. A tentatively proposed project schedule is as follows: • Anticipated finalization of contract award: February 8, 2021 ■ Conceptual Design: 6 weeks • Schematic Design: 6 weeks • Design Development/Land Use Process: 14 weeks if a One Step or 9 months if Major PD Amendment • Final Design CD: 12 weeks • Permits submission and review 36 weeks • Construction & Closeout: 10 months 2.0 Project Description Burlingame Childcare Center Request for Proposals — Architect/Design Services Page 4 UUuuolyl1 GI IVCIUpC ILl. OCUJ/1L4D-UI..UOKlMJU-O IOD-rYJJULUDLU/L ONO 'K CITY OF ASPEN 2.1 Project Summary The City of Aspen wishes to develop a mixed -use project on vacant property it owns within the Burlingame Subdivision/Planned Development. The programming for the site will include development of a childcare center with appropriate indoor and outdoor spaces, well designed multi -modal circulation for the site as well as some on -site housing intended for employees. The initial contract award for this RFP will include only Part 1 as categorized below in Section 3.0. Additional portions of scope are anticipated to be added as additional services as the project moves forward. 2.2 Project Site The subject site is described as Park Parcel C within the Burlingame Subdivision/PD and contains 37,502 sq. ft. of area that has street frontage along Harmony Road and Paepcke Road, the former being the primary road into and out of the subdivision, the latter currently a dirt road that will be improved as part of the construction being undertaken for Phase 3 of Burlingame. Adjacent to this parcel are two lots approved for single-family or duplex residential development, Lot 3 (4,542 sq. ft.) and Lot 4 (4,486 sq. ft.), all three totaling 46,530 sq. ft. of area that may be considered for development as part of the overall site plan. Figure 1: Vicinity Map Burlingame Childcare Center Request for Proposals — Architect/Design Services Page 5 LJUUUJIyII CIIVUjUpR7 ILJ. OCVJML4O-U%,L)0-"MUL)-0 10D-r'FJJacvocurc Figure 2: Site Detail f� 1�NA V CITY OF ASPEN 2.3 Programming Expectations The city would like to develop the site with a day care facility meeting the following minimum requirements, as well as include a limited number of affordable housing units on the site. 2.3.A Childcare program. The childcare center is to include Licensing Rules — 7.702.6 equipment, and 7,702.71 building site. The facility shall include indoor space for at least 7 classrooms, each at least 600 sq.ft., reception, office, adult and child bathrooms, kitchen, laundry, storage, teacher break space, space for nursing mothers, parking and parent drop off space. In light of the pandemic, HVAC systems and air quality should be thoughtfully addressed in any design. The facility: ■ must have secure access. • must have ADA access. Burlingame Childcare Center Request for Proposals — Architect/Design Services Page 6 UUliuolly.lI CI IVCIUVt; IIJ. OCUJM44D-Ut,JO-fMJU-0 IOD-r4JJJLUDLU/L #N�� i%om a PA 0 CITY OFASPEN infant and toddler rooms must have grade level access. No child under first grade can be cared for in areas above or below the main floor of exit, unless allowed by the building code and approved by the local fire department. diapering areas must provide privacy and supervision, must be located on hard surface flooring. ■ food preparation must be prepared in the kitchen, or each classroom must have a separate sink for food preparation. • provide toilet facilities for adults that must be separate from children's facilities. Toilet rooms for children must be separate from rooms used for other purposes. • does not need to provide toilet facilities for children under 2 years but must be provided for children over 2 years. Toilet rooms for toddlers must be located within the toddler classroom. • must provide diapering facilities within reach of a hand washing sink. • windows should be able to be darkened — but no cords. • must provide one exit from each room directly to the exterior of the building or to a common hallway — it may not go through another classroom to get to the hallway. ■ must have an automatic fire alarm system to warn occupants and to facilitate fire drills. 2.3.191. Outdoor space. • Fall zone material under any equipment that is over 18 inches tall, maximum height allowed is 6 feet for children ages 2.5 to 6, and 3 feet tall for children under 2.5 years. • Playground space must have at least 75 sq. ft. per child using the play area at one time, at least 1,500 sq.ft. ■ Playground fences must be at least 4.5 feet tall, playground needs to be easily supervised. • Playground space for infants and toddlers must be separate from a preschool playground. And must be at least 400 sq.ft. ■ Playgrounds must have at least 2 surfaces. • Playground must have at least 150 sq.ft. of shaded area. 2.3.0 Site circulation. • The site plan needs to accommodate parent drop off and pick up, ideally one way with pullout spots. Multi -modal access is to be included in the design for walking and biking to the site in addition to vehicular access. ■ Appropriate levels (and code compliant) off-street parking to be provided on -site. • Emergency vehicle access needs to be incorporate din the design. 2.3.D Permitting requirements. Besides the typical building permit application and review process, where multiple departments and districts, such as the Aspen Fire district review the application, the construction documents are required to be reviewed by the state childcare licensing department. 2.3.E Housing Component. The housing component is proposed to consist of 4 dwellings, meeting the minimum unit size standards of the APCHA Regulations (based on bedroom count) and meeting city off-street parking requirements. These units are initially envisioned to be part of the childcare building, but the design team should develop a site plan that is well thought out and emphasizes the livability and enjoyability of the units that are in close proximity to one's workplace. Aspenites enjoy an active lifestyle and a great environment, so storage considerations and outdoor living opportunities are a must with any design. Burlingame Childcare Center Request for Proposals — Architect/Design Services Page 7 uuuu0iyii envetwNe IL). 10o-r4a11ocuocv14 i CITY OFASPEN 2.4 Technical Studies In addition to traffic and parking concerns that have been raised, the site contains steep slopes and a drainage basin that require consideration. A Level 2 Traffic Impact Analysis (TIA) will be required as part of the land use application submission. Additional information on the requirements of the TIA can be found at https://www.cityofas2en,com/DocumentCenterZytLewL2208aIA-Guideline5. 3.0 Scope of Services 3.1 Part 1: Conceptual/Schematic Design The Part 1 Conceptual/Schematic Design scope is meant to first test out a minimum of two initial conceptual designs: one with housing and one without and otherwise propose a design than can accommodate the outlined programming. Once a design path is chosen, the goal is to prepare sufficient schematic design documentation to support the land use entitlements application and process. The proposal should include advancement of the technical studies needed to support the SD level of design completion. A component of Part 1 should be the engagement of the residents of the subdivision where the childcare center is proposed, engagement with the broader community, as well as with specific stakeholders. Coordination with the city's communications department to build upon outreach that has started is necessary. At a minimum, the team should expect to coordinate one neighborhood meeting to discuss and receive feedback on the conceptual designs. A broader community meeting to discuss the same topic and disseminate information, as well as a work session with city council should be anticipated but will be finalized with the communications department. 3.2 Part 2: Support for the Land Use Application and review process In preparing the land use application, the Part 2 scope described here is meant to fill the detail gap to the extent needed to fulfill the requirements as described in the Aspen Municipal Code to submit a land use application. This is for the purpose of preparing the application for submittal and for supporting the development review and approval process. It is anticipated, at this point, that a city staff person will lead the lead the development of the application and be the application lead in the review process. It is anticipated that the SD deliverables will fall somewhat short of sufficient detail for the land use application. Filling the detail gap in this manner is proposed for time efficiency, rather than running through an entire DD process to reach the level of detail needed to submit the initial land use application. During the land use review process, architect will lead the A&E design team to coordinate responses to questions and comments from one meeting to the next throughout the review process, through completion. Depending upon the quality, completeness, level of regulatory compliance and community uptake of the application submitted, this process can require numerous iterations to reach completion. Assume the following Public Meetings to Support the Land Use Entitlements Process: • Assume 3 Public Meetings with City Council • Assume 4 Public Meetings with the Planning and Zoning Commission Assume each public meeting shall consist of one 3-hour in -person meeting. Include preparation for presentation and staff as appropriate. Burlingame Childcare Center Request for Proposals — Architect/Design Services Page 8 UUUUJIylI CIIVU1UpU w. oCUJML1+o-UVU0-4hUU-0 I 0D-r'+;J0JLUD4L//4 CITY OF ASPEN Please review the requirements in code chapter 26.445, Planned Development, and estimate the level of effort needed to fill the gap as described and to produce exhibits as needed for the land use application. Also estimate the time needed to support the land use review process. These deliverables will be in addition to typical SD deliverables and should be customized for the application. 3.3 Part 3: Design Development It is anticipated that the DD process should begin immediately after the land use application is accepted by the City of Aspen Community Development Department. The Part 3 Design Development scope consists of typical AIA DID Scope of Work as per Article 3 of the attached contract. An additional presentation to Aspen City Council will be necessary during this part of the process to continue to seek approval as the designs are advanced and as more information about the project is made available. Weekly project team meetings and additional follow-up meetings to support the DID process should also be anticipated. 3.4 Part 4: Approval Documents- recordation support After the project has been approved by the required boards and commissions, it will be necessary to begin Part 4 and produce the documentation to memorialize the site -specific approval. Such documentation typically requires production and recording of the approved site and landscape plan, representative architecturals, as well as initial engineering which will memorialize the approved project. 3.5 Part 5: Construction Documents The Part 5 Construction Documents scope consists of typical AIA CD Scope of Work and Bidding and Negotiation Services as per Article 3 of the attached contract. 3.6 Part 6: Support for the Building Permit Application Process Preparation of CD documentation should be aimed specifically at satisfying the building permit application process and should include production of ALL BUILDING PERMIT APPLICATION MATERIALS required for building permit application submittal. Information about the building permit application requirements and process are available at the City of Aspen website. The architect shall perform the building permit application submittal process through the required regulatory application process. Architect shall work toward final acceptance of all building permit application materials by such regulatory department staff. During the regulatory review process, architect will lead the A&E design team to coordinate responses to regulatory questions and comments throughout the regulatory review process, through completion and issuance of building permits. Depending upon the quality, completeness and level of regulatory compliance of the application materials submitted, this process can require numerous iterations to reach completion. 3.7 Part 7: Construction Administration Weekly project team meetings and additional follow-up meetings to support the design effort should be anticipated. The Part 7 CA scope consists of typical AIA CA Scope of Work and Bidding and Negotiation Services as per Article 3 of the attached contract. Burlingame Childcare Center Request for Proposals — Architect/Design Services Page 9 L/UUUOIyII CIIVGV1Jt; IL). oCU0h44D-UVu0wrAuL!-0 ioD-r'}uauLUDLLJ/L `S��i Y CITY OFASPEN 3.8 Part 8: Project Closeout and Warranty Support The Part 8 Project Completion scope consists of typical AIA CA Scope of Work and Bidding and Negotiation Services as per Article 3 of the attached contract, however it is anticipated that a 2-year warranty period will be necessary and that support for ongoing warranty issues will be required throughout the warranty process. Project team meetings would only occur occasionally and would be scheduled in an ad hoc manner during this time. 4.0 RFP Process Sealed proposals will be received at the City of Aspen Purchasing office, through the Bidnet Direct website (www.bidnetdirect.com) until 2:00pm (MDT), December 14, 2021, at which time the proposals will be opened and reviewed, for the following City of Aspen project: 2021-239 Architecture & Engineering Design Team for the Burlingame Childcare Center. The selection process will consist of proposal evaluations by the selection committee, and Proposers will be notified of further process thereafter. In addition to price, the evaluation criteria set forth below may be considered in judging which Proposal is in the best interests of the City. 4.1 Questions Candidates should post pertinent questions on the Bidnet Direct website, www.bidnetdirect.com, no later than December 1, 2021. Answers will be posted online for all Candidates to review. It is the Candidate's responsibility to check the website for Q&As, addendums, RFP Clarifications, and other important information. A mandatory, virtual pre -bid meeting is required. Use the following link to join the pre -bid conference call on Tuesday, November 16, 2021, at 10:00 am (MST). https://globaI.gotc)meeting.com/join/738591653 You can also dial in using your phone. United States: +1(571) 317-3112, Access Code: 738-591-653 4.2 RFP Schedule At this time, the following process and timeline is anticipated. The City reserves the right to modify the process or timeline: RFP Issued October 22, 2021 Pre -Bid Conference November 16, 2021, 10:OOAM RFP Questions Close November 30, 2021 Proposals Due December 14, 2021, 2:OOPM Intent of Award by mid- January 2022 4.3 Proposal Submission and Format Electronic submission is to be uploaded on the Bidnet Direct website, www.bidnetdirect.com. The electronic submission must be compiled into a single PDF document plus the unprotected Excel workbook of hourly rates, Burlingame Childcare Center Request for Proposals — Architect/Design Services Page 10 LJUUUJIIJ.II CIIVUIUVW ILi. OCUJMV+D-VliJ0-4/1JU-0 10D-rYJ0J4UDLU/4 nF ASPEN hours and fees. Please reduce file size to the extent possible. The name of the documents must contain the City project number and firm's name. Proposals are due by: 2:00pm (MDT), December 14, 2021. 4.4 Evaluation Criteria The City of Aspen reserves the right to select the proposer that it deems, in its sole discretion, to have presented a proposal that is in the best interests of the City of Aspen. In addition to price, the evaluation criteria and weightings listed below may be considered in judging which Proposal is in the best interests of the City of Aspen and are subject to chaff by the selection committee based on the best interests of the City of Aspen: 30% Response to section 5.1 Lead Firm and Team Qualifications 30% Response to section 5.2 Relevant Project Experience 10% Response to section 5.3 Additional Expertise Sought 30% Response to section 5.4 Proposed Hours and Fees, Schedule, Contract, Insurance 5.0 Proposal Re uirements 5.1 Qualifications Firms/teams responding to this RFP must show organizational and financial capability on similar projects. 5.1.A Overview of the Firm/Team. Please provide the following items: 1) Please provide your firm's qualifications via AIA Document B305, Architect's Qualification Statement. 2) Please provide a description of your firm's financial history including: • Whether your organization is in the process of filing or has filed bankruptcy within the last five years. • A letter from you firm's financial institution noting your firm's financial stability. 5.1.13 Relevant Team Experience. Please provide a list of projects relevant to the program described in this RFP and include the following information: • Size and dollar value of each project. • Contact person and phone number for the Owner and Contractor, or other relevant references for each. • Relevant project experience focused on similar recent municipal and historical structure projects. ■ Emphasis on projects located in a mountainous setting, specifically projects in Aspen and/or Pitkin County. • Familiarity and experience with sustainable design (including LEED certification and Net Zero design). • Detailed outline of project scope as well as your firm's specific scope of services provided. • Identify if your firm was the Design Architect or Architect of Record for each of the relevant projects listed. 5.1.0 Design Capabilities. Please describe in detail the firm/team's overall design capabilities as they relate to each phase of the process. SAM In -House Personnel Dedicated to the Project. Present the qualifications of the in-house design team leader and the design team members as follows: • Proposed role and decision -making capabilities for this project. ■ Current resume. • List of projects completed by this individual including specific scope of work. • Owner and General Contractor contact person and phone number for each project listed. • Key qualifications that make this individual an ideal fit for this project. Burlingame Childcare Center Request for Proposals — Architect/Design Services Page 11 L/uUUGHYII CIlvtIlu v, ILl. 10o-r•ro0ocvo4u14 � FA CITY OFASPEN Number of hours per week this individual will be dedicated to this project during the design phase (you may refer to section 5.2.C). Number of hours per week this individual will be dedicated to this project during the construction phase (you may refer to section 5.2.C). 5.1.E Consultants/Engineers. Please list all proposed consultants & engineers referenced in the fee worksheet. Summarize the work the firm will contribute to the project and how each consultant/engineer is a value add to this specific project. For each consultant/engineer, include the following information: • Firm Name • Address • Contact Name, Phone Number & Email Address • Firm's Website Address 5.2 Proposal Elements 5.2.A Acknowledgement of Scope of Services. 1) Please summarize/verify your understanding of the scope of services requested in this RFP as well as described in the contract. 2) Describe how your firm/team will approach and execute each section of the scope of services and describe how your firm/team can add value to the services requested to create a successful project. 3) Please also describe what elements of efficiency your firm/team will bring to the project approach in order to help the City of Aspen best utilize funds and make suggestions in each area of the approach on what your firm will do to ensure that the intended outcomes of the project methodology are reached. 5.2.113 Fee Worksheet. 1) Fees: Please complete the included fee worksheet. In doing so, please submit lump sum fees to provide the services requested by phase as categorized in the fee worksheet. 2) Reimbursables: Clearly identify all categories of reimbursable expenses, their proposed percentage of markup, and anticipated cost. Use comments as needed. The Owner expects to include the reimbursable amount proposed in the final design contract as a top -set to be billed against. Candidates are to assume detailed backup of reimbursable costs will be required with each invoice. 5.2.0 Detailed Schedule. 1) Prepare a detailed suggested schedule, based on the design process, that will meet the constraints described in section 1.3.C. and describe the level of effort of each individual or role throughout each phase of the schedule and how, in each phase, your firm/team will integrate with the team. 2) Please illustrate the billing rates associated with each individual or role and the amount of effort by each so that it will be clear how the overall pricing in the fee worksheet has been built up to reach the total for the proposal. 5.2.D Design Process Coordination / Quality Control. Describe how your firm/team will coordinate work during each phase of the schedule and what your firm/team will do to ensure quality. Include the amount of travel and frequency of on and off -site meetings and conference calls suggested for the project. Burlingame Childcare Center Request for Proposals — Architect/Design Services Page 12 UUliuolylI CI IvulupC IU. OCUJML'#O-UlJJO-YMJU-O IOO-r4JJJLUDLU/L / CITY OF ASPEN 5.2.E Additional Requirements. In addition to the scope of services described in this RFP and the services described in the attached contract, be sure that the proposal also addresses the following: 1) The City of Aspen requires that the selected firm/teamwork as part of the Design team to develop an efficient, sustainable design that exists in harmony with its surrounding environment and shall meet the functional and constructability requirements of a properly completed project. 2) The design team is expected to support the construction cost estimating effort as needed with the General Contractor, Owner's Agent and Commissioning Agent throughout the design process. 3) During each phase of the design process, the design team will be responsible for presenting the project design to City of Aspen stakeholder groups and Aspen City Council. The intent of these stakeholder sessions will be to provide updates and to receive (and to incorporate to the extent possible within the City's goals and objectives) feedback about the project's design. Specify in your proposal what level of sketches, renderings, graphics or modeling your proposal includes at each phase and describe how each will be sufficient for presentation at each phase. 4) The design team will be responsible, along with the Contractor at Risk and Owner's Agent, for presenting documentation that supports the Contractor's GMP bid for the project to Aspen City Council. 5) Your firm should assume general responsibility for all aspects of sustainable design. 6) The selected firm will be required to execute and perform work subject to the attached AIA B132 form of agreement between the Owner and Architect and the AIA A201- 2007 General Conditions. Please make the necessary arrangements with your legal and insurance teams to accommodate this request. The contract documents included provide a working framework for the overall project approach and should be considered part of the scope of work required by this RFP. All contents of proposals received are in the public domain and all material is likely to be published in recommendations of award etc. If ANY information contained within your proposal is deemed sensitive or confidential, please indicate this clearly and CoA will strive to retain this Confidentiality. 5.3 Proposal Format Preferred electronic format is a single .pdf of your firm's complete response. The fee schedule is to uploaded as a separate document. So that the selection committee may most easily reference sections and pages of the proposal, please number all pages and provide tab sheets to separate sections and provide an index or table of contents. Proposals submitted in response to this solicitation are irrevocable for 60 days following the due date of the proposals. This period may be extended by written agreement between Respondent and the City of Aspen. 6.0 Owner's Language 6.1 Interests of the City of Aspen The City of Aspen reserves the right to reject any or all Proposals or accept what is, in its sole judgment, the Proposal which is in the City's best interest. The City further reserves the right, in the best interests of the City, to modify this RFP process as it sees fit or waive any technical defects or irregularities in any and all Proposals submitted. Burlingame Childcare Center Request for Proposals — Architect/Design Services Page 13 UVUUJIIylI CIIVCIVpt7 IU. Or-VJ)11.}D-U%,J0-YNUU'0 I OD-r'F:)0:7LUDLU/4 fix ��! YA CITY OFASPEN The successful Respondent is prohibited from assigning or subcontracting the whole or any part of the contract without the prior written consent of the owner. 6.2 Insurance Requirements Refer to the attached AIA B132 form of agreement between the Owner and Architect and the AIA A201- 2007 General Conditions contract attachments for insurance requirements. 7.0 Exhibits 7.1 Contracts AIA B101 Agreement between the Owner and Architect AIA A201- 2007 General Conditions. B305 - Qualifications Statement Burlingame Childcare Center Request for Proposals — Architect/Design Services Page 14 Exhibit C Burlingame Childcare Center, City of Aspen project A2021-239 14-Mar-22 Discipline Company Name Part 1: Part 2A (3 Part 2B (1 Part 3: Design Part4: Par 5 Part 6: Support Part 7: Part B: Cost Per Discipline Base Services Cost Conceptual/Sc STEP): Support STEP): Support Development Approval Construction forthe Construction Closeout and Per Discipline hematic for the Land forth eLand Documents Documents Building Administration Warranty Design use Application use Applicatiorl and Permit Architect -ECE&Housing L+S/AFA/RDG 5 12SSW 5 50,00C $43,000 $124,300 S1S,COC $218,400 531,200 S156,000 531,200 5748,200 5659,O00 3 Architect - E-CEOnly L+S/AFA,+RDIG, $ 96,450 5 3 7, 500 532„50 $93,600 $11,250 $163,300 523,400 5117,D00 523,4O0 5561,150 5494,250 La noicapeArc Initecture. DHM Design 5 10,720 5 9,8'-0 $7,360 515,000 $2,620 $16,600 51,3E0 55,120 $2,690 $61,520 550,120 Civil Engineering Soprislingineering 5 10,909 S 24,597 519,317 $33;722 $9,605 Sa3,839 $19,710 521,619 $9,298 5167,518 511&,886 SustainabilityConsult. •ECMatol Graup14Engineerin;.PBC $ 9,829 5 - 50 59,181 $4,584 s0 50 50 523,593 523,593 SustainabilityConsult .-ECEOnly Groupl4Engineering, PBC S 8.795 $ 50 $7,633 50 53,567 $0 50 50 519,994 519.98z PR? Community Relations Project Resource Studio S 23,625 5 14,OW 514,050 5o SO 50 50 So 50 537,675 $23,625 Interiors ROG(included inArchitecture) 5 $ - SO SO $0 50 $0 SO SO 50 50 Traffic Engineering McDowell Engineerinj 5 4,190 $ 18,040 518,040 $o so $0 50 5.0 so $22,220 $4,180 Drainage Engineering SoprisEnyineering (included inCivil) S - 5 - SO SO 50 5o SO 50 SO SO So Structural -ECE&Housir3 Evolve Structural Design 5 12,020 S 2,300 $2,10C $20,290 51,960 $23,770 52,035 $12,255 $1,160 $79,530 $69,485 Structural -ECEOnly Evolve Structural Design S 9,009 5 1,575 51,575 $15,212 51,470 $17,829 51,526 59,191 $870 556,685 552,114 MEPEng. -ECE&Housing Branch Pattern $ 13,197 5 $0 $29,060 SO 529,060 $4,476 $23,386 $3,099 SIC2.278 $97,802 MEPEng. -ECE Only Branch Pattern 5 10,552 5 $0 $23,249 $0 $23,249 53,581 $18,709 $2,479 $91,922 $78,242 Waterproofing/Snow IL+S(included inArchitecture) S 5 50 so SO SO SO 50 50 50 S0 Spae.Writer IRDG (included in Architecture) $ 5 SO so $0 $0 SO $0 $D SO $0 Fire Protection Branch Pattern (included in MEP) $ - 5 - 50 SO SO SO SD SO $o so SO Life Seftty Code Consult. 'Included in Architecture $ 5 so SO $0 SO SO SO SD SO $0 Modular Consult. NA s $ so SO SO s0 $0 s0 $o $0 50 Rendering; Included in Architecture $ - 5 s0 SO $0 SO SO 50 50 50 $0 Irrigation Design HydroSystems-KDI $ i.9:0 5 - $0 52,880 $0 $3,840 SO $960 50 59,600 $9,600 Land Planner Davis Horn Inc $ 6,000 5 as,OOC 533,000 $0 MOW SO $0 so 50 $45,000 $61000 Acoustics+Tech - ECE&Housins Branch Pattern S 5,751 S - 50 $2,620 SO $8,620 $1,576 57,432 53,939 533,938 532,362 .Acoustics+Tech-ECE Only BranchPattern S 4,601 S - 50 SE,896 SO $6,&96 51,261 55,946 $1,551 527,150 $25,990 Food Service Consultant Sturm Consulting $ Soo 5 - SO 53,500 SO $3,450 5o 51,200 $150 56,700 56,700 Subtotal ECEOnly 5 1,097,024 5 187,254 $ 138,G-02 $125.592 5199,596 $31,005 $292,567 $50,838 5179,7»4 $40,429 Reimbursables $ 50,567 $ 18,725 s 4,851 54,396 $6,986 $1,085 59,890 $1,779 56,291 51,415 ECE On Iy S 1,147,591 5 205,980 5 143,453 $129,998 5206,592 $32,090 5292.e57 $52,617 51,36,035 541,843 Total ECE Only -1 step $ 1,147,591 Subtotal ECE & 5*=c $ 1,348,581 5 227.241 5 151,627 5136,867 $244,953 535,245 5351,663 560,3S7 5227,971 $49.526 Reimbursables $ 61.971 S 22,724 $ 5,307 54,790 58,573 $1,234 512.109 52,112 57,979 51,733 ECE+Housing $ 1,410,552 5 249,965 5 156,994 $141,659 $253,526 $36,479 $363.971 $62,469 $235,950 $51,259 Total ECE & Housing -3 step $ 1,410,552 Base Servi c ■i ECE+ Ho issi n; 3 m p (Remove PRS, traffic, planner, $ 969,893 5 177,356 S 96,537 571,777 $225,752 529,245 $335,009 $58,781 5219,339 SS7,437 l c-tE - 4end =arricQs: Rpmeti� Base ServicesJust Architecture 5 624,000 130 Exhibit C Notes 1) The fees defined above reflex the current project understanding of the RFP 2) included below for considerations are potential Additional services our team can provide forth is project at the Owner's direction. 3) There are two options for phase 2 available for Base Services, we will select only one prior to commencing that phase of work_ The 3-step land use process is listed as 2A and 1-step land use process ZB. 4) This worksheet includes an estimated amount of reimbursables per phase. An administrative mark-up of 10% will be included on all reimbursable billing. 5) Fees related to approvals are by owner. 6) Documentation process to pursue LEED, WELL Building or Living Building Certficiation is not included in base services. The process and associated fee can be included as Add -on service ifthe Owner elects to include a defined level of one of the Cercificaticns 7) Lump Sum value of each Add -On service included on right side column in the worksheet. 6) Our original proposal located services related to bidding and negotiation uder phase 6. We have not changed the fee but relocated that service to phase 5 in this updated fee spreadsheet to better reflectthe RFP. Optional Additional Services GonnpanV Name Part 1 Part 2A Part ZB Part 3 Part 4 Part 5 Part 6 Part 7 Part8 Lump Sum Cost Per Scope Community Outreach after Phase Project Resource Studio $9,725 $2,700 $3,375 $4,500 $6,750 57,350 $34,40C FinancalOperations Mgmr. AFA/RDG $ 7,580 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $7,58C Construction CostEsdrnare L+5 $ 15,000 $0 $0 1$0 1$0 $0 1. $0 $15,000 Total Su6totalEachContractPart $ 22,590 $9,725 52,700 $3,375 $4,500 56,750 $7,350 Grand Total S56,980 131 Land+Shelter (Architect of Record) with Alan Ford Architects and RDG Planning & Design (Burlingame Childcare Center, Cityof Aspen pro)ea P2021-239 1=-h1ar-22 Name 12021 12022 Atchi tecc L-S / AFA/ ROG Landscape Architecture DHM Design Civil Engineering Sopns Engineering Susiamab, rr Consul[ Group14 Engineering, PSC P R. yCom• na%Relations Project Resource Studio Interiors ROG (included in Arch,teaurej Traffic Engineering McDowell Engineering Drainage Engineering Spoils Engineering (included in Civil) Structural Engineering Evolve Structural Design MEP Fr-yme..,ny Branch Partern LNa;fi'C rCaitng; inCW LDS [included in Architecture, S pec.Writer ROG (included in Arclikecture) Fire Pro action 9raocn Fatter hlttiv"s tit MEFI Life Safety Code Consult Included in Arch, Lecture 7lnAl nray Included in Architecture I negation Oes pn Hydrd5Vs ms-KDI Land Planner Davis Hom Inc AcousticsaiaraPatter Food Service Consultant :iturmnch Cdnsulting Ndtes 1) The fees defined above reflect the current project understand i ng of the RFP 2) Included below far considerations are potential add -on services our team can provide for this project. SI Refer m Fees tab for additional NOTES from the AE ream. Optional Additional Services Name 12021 12022 Community Outreach after Phase 2 Prdject Resource Studio Finance 0pemsarw R!ymt 4FA(RDG Construction Cost Estimate !�5 2023 2024 2024 2025 2026 Exhibit C 132 Land+Shelter Post Office Box 550, Carbondale, Colorado 81623 TO 970.963.0201 Fax 970.963.0289 ARCHITECTURE AND PLANNING Email infoiculandandshelter.com wWwlandandshelter.com March 4, 2022 Assumptions for the L+S/AFA/RDG Fee Exhibit for the Burlingame Early Childhood Education Center, Aspen project 2021-239: ■ The base services project is 8000sf of childcare center. Our fee caps the childcare center at 8000sf per the RFP. That is a smaller childcare center, and if, through programming, it becomes larger, our fees will revise up. Our contract indicates that we can revise by 10%, so 8800sf. • We may need the residential lots adjacent to park parcel C in order to make this childcare center work, regardless of the inclusion of housing. We have created some test fits to show how challenging this will be. It is not impossible, just raises the question. A project using only park parcel C might end up a bit under parked, steeply graded, and posing some firefighting questions. • Housing may or may not be included for up to an additional 4000sf. We assume this will likely be on a 2nd or 3.d floor. We have broken out line items for fee for housing for all team members impacted. This includes architecture, MEP, structure, acoustics and tech. Civil, landscape, planning, etc — all do not feel this has impact on their fee. We understand the options as ECE Only or ECE+Housing. We do not offer the housing fee as a stand-alone project proposal. Also, we assume that it is likely that we are reviewing ECE+Housing for phase 1 and then making a choice about which way to proceed moving forward after phase 1. Please confirm that is your understanding as well. • We assume this site will need retaining walls in order to provide the site amenities necessary for a childcare center. This will be true whether or not we include the two housing lots, but the amount of retainage increases if we are confined to only park parcel C. At this time, we do not have a Geotechnical report. If that data comes back creating "above & beyond" complexities to the structural design, we will need to address that in additional services. The site wall designs are all unknown at this time, but we assume there will be a few. We were assuming we would work through these from the structural end, but if anything gets beyond standard concrete wall and footing, like permanent soil nailed/micropile walls that require a 3'd party design, that type of structural solution is excluded from our fee. • Our team fee does not include any sustainability certification at this time. (WELL/Living Building/Etc — those would be additional fees). • Civil and landscape have assumed that they will need to incorporate the re -design planned improvements currently designed on park parcel C. i.e. — the current water treatment system planned for that lot will be a part of our our design. Landscape Arch will be responsible for the concept and rough grading. Civil will be responsible for re -engineering the water quality systems after landscape does the first pass. We assume these open ponds will need to become subgrade, urban type systems due to site constraints. It's not clear how the path will be re-routed. • Once our contract documents are 100% complete they will be noted as "Not for Construction" If/when the documents are utilized for bidding and construction, we expect (for insurability and standard of care reasons) that our team will be engaged for the construction administration phase (at the level of construction administration services as described within the standard AIA contract). ■ We assume we will be developing a program without the assistance of a provider. If program or design changes after schematic design is 50% complete, fees may need to be adjusted. • Geotechnical information will be provided by City no later than early design development phase. • We assume the budget will be established at a high level during the concept phase and finalized prior to proceeding into DD. This can be through our add/alt cost estimating, but if not, we assume the owner will provide the budget at these times. 1/ 1