Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
agenda.hpc.20220427
1 AGENDA ASPEN HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION April 27, 2022 4:30 PM, City Council Chambers 427 Rio Grande Place I.SITE VISIT I.A.12:00pm - 949 W. Smuggler - AspenModern Designation and Conceptual Review II.ROLL CALL III.MINUTES IV.PUBLIC COMMENTS V.COMMISSIONER MEMBER COMMENTS VI.DISCLOSURE OF CONFLICT OF INTEREST VII.PROJECT MONITORING VIII.STAFF COMMENTS IX.CERTIFICATE OF NO NEGATIVE EFFECT ISSUED X.CALL UP REPORTS XI.SUBMIT PUBLIC NOTICE FOR AGENDA ITEMS XII.OLD BUSINESS XII.A.312 W. Hyman - Conceptual Review and Setback Variations 312_W_Hopkins_Resolution_2022_04_27.pdf 312_W_Hyman_Memo_20220427.pdf Exhibit A_HPGuidelinesCriteria_312 W Hyman_2022.0427.pdf Exhibit B_312 W Hyman 2022.0427.pdf Exhibit C.1 Application 312 W Hyman_2022.0427.pdf Exhibit C.2 Application 312 W Hyman Plans_2022.0427.pdf Exhibit C.3 Home Energy Assessment 312 W Hyman.2022.0427.pdf 1 2 Exhibit C.4 Forestry_Conceptual.2022.0427.pdf XIII.NEW BUSINESS XIV.ADJOURN XV.NEXT RESOLUTION NUMBER XVI.WORK SESSION XVI.A.Work Session Agenda Work Session Agenda.pdf TYPICAL PROCEEDING FORMAT FOR ALL PUBLIC HEARINGS (1 Hour, 10 Minutes for each Major Agenda Item) 1. Declaration of Conflicts of Interest (at beginning of agenda) 2. Presentation of proof of legal notice (at beginning of agenda) 3. Applicant presentation (20 minutes) 4. Board questions and clarifications of applicant (5 minutes) 5. Staff presentation (5 minutes) 6. Board questions and clarifications of staff (5 minutes) 7. Public comments (5 minutes total, or 3 minutes/ person or as determined by the Chair) 8. Close public comment portion of hearing 9. Applicant rebuttal/clarification (5 minutes) 10. Staff rebuttal/clarification (5 minutes) End of fact finding. Chairperson identifies the issues to be discussed. 11. Deliberation by the commission and findings based on criteria commences. No further input from applicant or staff unless invited by the Chair. Staff may ask to be recognized if there is a factual error to be corrected. If the item is to be continued, the Chair may provide a summary of areas to be restudied at their discretion, but the applicant is not to re-start discussion of the case or the board’s direction. (20 minutes) 12. Motion Updated: November 15, 2021 2 HPC Resolution #5, Series of 2022 Page 1 of 3 RESOLUTION #5, SERIES OF 2022 A RESOLUTION OF THE ASPEN HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION (HPC) GRANTING CONCEPTUAL MAJOR DEVELOPMENT REVIEW FOR THE PROPERTY LOCATED AT 312 W HYMAN AVE BLOCK: 46 LOT: P AND : - LOT: Q, CITY AND TOWNSITE OF ASPEN, COLORADO PARCEL ID: 2735-124-64-006 WHEREAS, the applicant, POWEDERDAYSKIING LLC, represented by Jeffrey Woodruff of Cloud View Design LLC, has requested HPC approval for Conceptual Major Development for the property located at 312 W Hyman, Block: 46 Lot: P AND: - Lot: Q, City and Townsite of Aspen, Colorado. As a historic landmark, the site is exempt from Residential Design Standards review; and WHEREAS, Section 26.415.070 of the Municipal Code states that “no building or structure shall be erected, constructed, enlarged, altered, repaired, relocated or improved involving a designated historic property or district until plans or sufficient information have been submitted to the Community Development Director and approved in accordance with the procedures established for their review;” and WHEREAS, for Conceptual Major Development Review, the HPC must review the application, a staff analysis report and the evidence presented at a hearing to determine the project’s conformance with the City of Aspen Historic Preservation Design Guidelines per Section 26.415.070.D.3.b.2 and 3 of the Municipal Code and other applicable Code Sections. The HPC may approve, disapprove, approve with conditions or continue the application to obtain additional information necessary to make a decision to approve or deny; and WHEREAS, Community Development Department staff reviewed the application for compliance with applicable review standards and recommends approval with conditions; and WHEREAS, HPC reviewed the project on January 26, 2022. HPC considered the application, the staff memo and public comment, and found the proposal consistent with the review standards and granted approval with conditions by a unanimous vote of 7-0. 3 HPC Resolution #5, Series of 2022 Page 2 of 3 NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED: That HPC hereby approves Conceptual Major Development, and Setback Variations for 312 W. Hyman, Block: 46 Lot: P and : - Lot:Q, City and Townsite of Aspen, CO as follows: Section 1: Conceptual Major Development HPC hereby approves Conceptual Major Development as proposed. Section 2: Material Representations All material representations and commitments made by the Applicant pursuant to the development proposal approvals as herein awarded, whether in public hearing or documentation presented before the Community Development Department, the Historic Preservation Commission, or the Aspen City Council are hereby incorporated in such plan development approvals and the same shall be complied with as if fully set forth herein, unless amended by other specific conditions or an authorized authority. Section 3: Existing Litigation This Resolution shall not affect any existing litigation and shall not operate as an abatement of any action or proceeding now pending under or by virtue of the ordinances repealed or amended as herein provided, and the same shall be conducted and concluded under such prior ordinances. Section 4: Severability If any section, subsection, sentence, clause, phrase, or portion of this Resolution is for any reason held invalid or unconstitutional in a court of competent jurisdiction, such portion shall be deemed a separate, distinct and independent provision and shall not affect the validity of the remaining portions thereof. 4 HPC Resolution #5, Series of 2022 Page 3 of 3 Approved as to Content: ________________________________ Kara Thompson, Vice Chair Approved as to Form: ________________________________ Katharine Johnson, Assistant City Attorney ATTEST: ________________________________ Michael Sear, Deputy City Clerk APPROVED BY THE COMMISSION at its regular meeting on the 27th day of April, 2022. 5 Page 1 of 6 437 Rio Grande, Aspen, CO 81611-1975 | P: 970.920.5197 | cityofaspen.com 132 Memorandum TO: Aspen Historic Preservation Commission FROM: Natalie Feinberg Lopez, Historic Preservation Officer THROUGH: Natalie Feinberg Lopez, Historic Preservation MEETING DATE: April 27 2022 RE: 312 W Hyman Ave – Conceptual Major Development, PUBLIC HEARING APPLICANT /OWNER: POWEDERDAYSKIING LLC REPRESENTATIVE: JEFFREY WOODRUFF LOCATION: Street Address: 312 W Hyman Ave Legal Description: Block: 46 Lot: P AND: - Lot: Q, City and Townsite of Aspen, Colorado Parcel Identification Number: PID# 2735-124-64-006 CURRENT ZONING & USE R-6 (Moderate-Density Residential); Single-family home PROPOSED ZONING & USE: No change SUMMARY: 312 W Hyman Ave is a 6000 sf lot located int he R-6 zone district, with a property that is landmarked for its early Chalet style single family home, relatively unaltered since construction in 1956. Proposed changes include a small addition at the back NE corner, three skylight additions, changes to the existing garage doors covering new glass sliders, a small change in the exterior stair location, and a new small single car detached garage at the back. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff supports and commends the size of the project and the attention to energy efficiency and recommends the project as it meets the requests provided for restudy and the City of Aspen Design Guidel ines for a designated landmarked structure. Staff recommends approval. Site Locator Map – 312 W Hyman 312 6 Page 2 of 6 437 Rio Grande, Aspen, CO 81611-1975 | P: 970.920.5197 | cityofaspen.com BACKGROUND: 312 West Hyman is a designated Aspen Modern landmark located on a 6,000 sf lot in the R-6 zone district. The house is a classic Chalet style building, completed in 1956 and locally designated in 2006. The historic orientation of the structure is not square to the property lines but is angled to face Aspen Mountain. The site includes several large pine and spruce trees of note surrounding this property. Julius Herman Birlauf, a Swiss-born immigrant, assisted his daughter, Genevieve Birlauf Leininger, with the construction that was inspired by both Swiss and Bavarian architectural styles found in small mountain towns of the Alps. Archives include an extensive family photo collection of the phases of construction, interiors, and family gatherings on the front porch. Family letters describe influences for construction, and the network of family and friends in Aspen while located at the house, underlining the house and family as important components of the heritage of Aspen. The original home is an excellent example of Chalet style architecture associated with early ski areas and mountain tourist locations around the world. Common architectural features include a simple, low pitched roof with large overhangs, a rectangular footprint, small horizontal windows, and a large balcony that runs along the length of the façade. Often first floor has less detail, the main entrance on a secondary elevation, and a white stucco finish, with the main living area on the second floor. Post War construction of the style often added large picture window(s) in limited locations, a variation from the traditional style found in the Alps. The exterior will often have decorative shutters, fascia, and porch railings in the shape of hearts or edelweiss motifs, which can be found at the 312 West Hyman, and is part of the character that adds to its landmarked status. Fig 1: Historic image of 312 W Hyman. This image is one phase after the period of original construction, with the first remodel. Alterations include the addition of small windows on the East elevation at the first floor, a character defining feature. c 1958 Fig.2: Recent image of 312 W Hyman, note nothing has been altered on this elevation. 04/2019 When the owner of 312 W Hyman proposed demolition of important property, it was purchased by the City of Aspen and designated historic to protect a culturally significant resource. After many years of the house serving the residential needs of City employees, it was sold to the current owner. 7 Page 3 of 6 437 Rio Grande, Aspen, CO 81611-1975 | P: 970.920.5197 | cityofaspen.com REQUEST OF HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION (HPC) The Applicant is requesting the following land use approvals: •Major Development (Section 26.415.070.D) to add small additions to the main structure of the historic home and construct a new addition to the rear of the property. . The Historic Preservation Commission (HPC) is the final review authority; however, this project is subject to Call-up Notice by City Council. PROJECT SUMMARY: The applicant proposes: 1.Two-story addition at the NE corner proposed as additional living space, tucked under the existing eaves. 2.New glass sliders at each of the garage door openings, while keeping the garage doors intact as a type of privacy door/shutter on the South elevation. 3. Existing attic vent on the South elevation will be changed to a small window, as the current ceiling will be removed to allow for the existing roof trusses to be exposed. 4.3 new flush-mounted skylights to be added 5.Move the exterior stairs on the East elevation by approximately 4 feet to accommodate usable living space for bedroom 3 on the interior. STAFF COMMENTS: Staff strongly supports the redesign of the current plan including minimal alterations to the landmarked structure, without moving the resource or creating an extensive addition, while proposing to reduce energy consumption and making an energy efficient home. Staff also supports the small garage designed to meet setback requirements and minimal tree removal. The redesigned project respects the historic landmark by maintaining all original window penetrations, historic shutters, landscape features, and location of the small addition at the NE corner. Two elements of the proposed project are not consistent with typical design guideline recommendations, but add significantly to allowing the project to remain on the current footprint without relocation, as well as allowing for addition daylighting and energy savings. Staff would support discussion related to window restoration and replacement as part of final review. Staff recommends approval. 8 Page 4 of 6 437 Rio Grande, Aspen, CO 81611-1975 | P: 970.920.5197 | cityofaspen.com Staff recommends HPC further discuss the following topic in more detail. 1.Historic Landmark –Restoration and Alterations: A preservation plan will be required for the restoration of the historic resource outlining the existing conditions and the proposed treatments. Staff fully supports the restoration of the historic resource and the removal of non-historic materials, such as the non-historic double door front entrance. Staff supports the restoration and rehabilitation of missing and changed elements. 2.New Garage Addition – Form, Materials and Fenestration: The proposed new addition is small, detached and significantly setback from the house while remaining within the required setbacks. The new addition has a minimal footprint and is one story, allowing the main house to remain the important structures from all vantage points. Additional information regarding materials to be reviewed during Final Review for compatibility, but currently appear to meet design guidelines. Staff finds the overall design of the new garage addition meets the relevant Historic Preservation Design Guidelines. 3.Site Planning and Parking: The proposed site planning respects the underlying zoning requirements for front, all side yard and rear setbacks, however the original structure is non-conforming for the required combined side yard setbacks due to the placement on the lot. Zoning has requested an exemption for the combined side yard setback. Engineering accepts the historic driveway, and Right of Way compliance. Previous requests for a sidewalk have been determined by parks to be detrimental to the large spruce tree located at the SW corner of the lot, and is no longer required. According to the Municipal Land Use Code, all residential dwelling units must provide two code compliant on-site parking spaces, as this plan does with one in the proposed garage addition, and ample additional parking on the current driveway. A new landscape plan shows the driveway with different materials, that will still allow for the parking requirements. Staff supports the location of the new garage addition, it addresses all referral comments as requested. REFERRAL COMMENTS: The application was referred out to other City departments who have requirements that will significantly affect the permit review. Please see Exhibit B for full comments. Engineering Department: 1. All concerns have been addressed 9 Page 5 of 6 437 Rio Grande, Aspen, CO 81611-1975 | P: 970.920.5197 | cityofaspen.com Parks Department: Tree protection measures will be required at the driplines of trees and no activity whatsoever is allowed within this area without the express written consent of the City Forester or his designee. All concerns have been addressed by the applicant, with multiple on site reviews between Parks, HPC and the Applicant team. Zoning Department: 1.All concerns have been addressed. Building Department: 1. All concerns have been addressed. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends approval. ATTACHMENTS: Resolution # (5), Series of 2022 Exhibit A – Historic Preservation Design Guidelines Criteria / Staff Findings Exhibit B – Referral Comments Exhibit C.1 – Application Exhibit C.2 – Application Plans Exhibit C.3 – Home Energy Assessment Exhibit C.4 – Forestry_Conceptual 10 Page 6 of 6 437 Rio Grande, Aspen, CO 81611-1975 | P: 970.920.5197 | cityofaspen.com 11 Page 1 of 13 Exhibit A.1 Historic Preservation Design Guidelines Criteria Staff Findings NOTE: Staff responses begin on page 12 of this exhibit, following the list of applicable guidelines. 26.415.070.D Major Development. No building, structure or landscape shall be erected, constructed, enlarged, altered, repaired, relocated or improved involving a designated historic property or a property located within a Historic District until plans or sufficient information have been submitted to the Community Development Director and approved in accordance with the procedures established for their review. An application for a building permit cannot be submitted without a development order. 3. Conceptual Development Plan Review b) The procedures for the review of conceptual development plans for major development projects are as follows: 1) The Community Development Director shall review the application materials submitted for conceptual or final development plan approval. If they are determined to be complete, the applicant will be notified in writing of this and a public hearing before the HPC shall be scheduled. Notice of the hearing shall be provided pursuant to Section 26.304.060.E.3 Paragraphs a, b and c. 2) Staff shall review the submittal material and prepare a report that analyzes the project's conformance with the design guidelines and other applicable Land Use Code sections. This report will be transmitted to the HPC with relevant information on the proposed project and a recommendation to continue, approve, disapprove or approve with conditions and the reasons for the recommendation. The HPC will review the application, the staff analysis report and the evidence presented at the hearing to determine the project's conformance with the City Historic Preservation Design Guidelines. 3) The HPC may approve, disapprove, approve with conditions or continue the application to obtain additional information necessary to make a decision to approve or deny. 4) A resolution of the HPC action shall be forwarded to the City Council in accordance with Section 26.415.120 - Appeals, notice to City Council, and call-up. No applications for Final Development Plan shall be accepted by the City and no associated permits shall be issued until the City Council takes action as described in said section. 12 Chapter 1: Site Planning & Landscape Design MET NOT MET 1.1 All projects shall respect the historic development pattern or context of the block, neighborhood or district. 1.4 Design a new driveway or improve an existing driveway in a manner that minimizes its visual impact. 1.5 Maintain the historic hierarchy of spaces. 1.6 Provide a simple walkway running perpendicular from the street to the front entry on residential projects. 1.7 Provide positive open space within a project site. 1.8 Consider stormwater quality needs early in the design process. 1.10 Built-in furnishings, such as water features, fire pits, grills, and hot tubs, that could interfere with or block views of historic structures are inappropriate. 1.11 Preserve and maintain historically significant landscaping on site, particularly landmark trees and shrubs. Chapter 2: Rehabilitation - Building Materials MET NOT MET 2.1 Preserve original building materials. 2.2 The finish of materials should be as it would have existed historically. 2.3 Match the original material in composition, scale and finish when replacing materials on primary surfaces. 2.4 Do not use synthetic materials as replacements for original building materials. 2.5 Covering original building materials with new materials is inappropriate. Chapter 3: Rehabilitation - Windows MET NOT MET 3.1 Preserve the functional and decorative features of a historic window. 3.2 Preserve the position, number, and arrangement of historic windows in a building wall. 3.3 Match a replacement window to the original in its design. 3.4 When replacing an original window, use materials that are the same as the original. 3.5 Preserve the size and proportion of a historic window opening. 3.6 Match, as closely as possible, the profile of the sash and its components to that of the original window. Chapter 4: Rehabilitation - Doors MET NOT MET 4.1 Preserve historically significant doors. 4.2 Maintain the original size of a door and its opening. 4.3 When a historic door or screen door is damaged, repair it and maintain its general historic appearance. 4.4 When replacing a door or screen door, use a design that has an appearance similar to the original door or a door associated with the style of the building. 4.5 Adding new doors on a historic building is generally not allowed. 4.7 Preserve historic hardware.MET MET MET MET MET MET Historic Preservation Design Guidelines Review Criteria for 312 W Hyman Ave The applicant is requesting Conceptual Major Development review for restoring the historic resource and a new above grade addition. The proposed design must meet applicable Historic Preservation Design Guidelines. MET MET MET MET MET MET MET MET MET MET MET MET MET MET MET MET MET MET MET 13 Page 3 of 13 Chapter 5: Rehabilitation - Porches & Balconies MET NOT MET 5.1 Preserve an original porch or balcony. 5.2 Avoid removing or covering historic materials and details. 5.3 Enclosing a porch or balcony is not appropriate. 5.4 If reconstruction is necessary, match the original in form, character and detail. 5.5 If new steps are to be added, construct them out of the same primary materials used on the original, and design them to be in scale with the porch or balcony 5.6 Avoid adding handrails or guardrails where they did not exist historically, particularly where visible from the street. Chapter 6: Rehabilitation - Architectural Details MET NOT MET 6.1 Preserve significant architectural features. 6.2 When disassembly of a historic element is necessary for its restoration, use methods that minimize damage to the original material. 6.3 Remove only the portion of the detail that is deteriorated and must be replaced. 6.4 Repair or replacement of missing or deteriorated features are required to be based on original designs. 6.5 Do not guess at “historic” designs for replacement parts. Chapter 7: Rehabilitation - Roofs MET NOT MET 7.1 Preserve the original form of a roof. 7.2 Preserve the original eave depth. 7.4 New vents should be minimized, carefully, placed and painted a dark color. 7.5 Preserve original chimneys, even if they are made non-functional. 7.7 Preserve original roof materials. 7.8 New or replacement roof materials should convey a scale, color and texture similar to the original. 7.10 Design gutters so that their visibility on the structure is minimized to the extent possible. Chapter 10: New Construction - Building Additions MET NOT MET 10.3 Design a new addition such that one's ability to interpret the historic character of the primary building is maintained. 10.4 The historic resource is to be the focus of the property, the entry point, and the predominant structure as viewed from the street. 10.6 Design a new addition to be recognized as a product of its own time. 10.8 Design an addition to be compatible in size and scale with the main building. 10.10 Place an addition at the rear of a primary building or set it back substantially from the front to minimize the visual impact on the historic structure and to allow the original proportions and character to remain prominent. 10.11 Roof forms shall be compatible with the historic building. 10.12 Design an addition to a historic structure that does not destroy or obscure historically important architectural features. MET MET MET MET MET MET MET MET MET MET MET MET MET MET MET MET MET MET MET MET MET MET MET MET MET 14 Page 4 of 13 Relevant Historic Preservation Design Guidelines: 1.1 All projects shall respect the historic development pattern or context of the block, neighborhood or district. •Building footprint and location should reinforce the traditional patterns of the neighborhood. •Allow for some porosity on a site. In a residential project, setback to setback development is typically uncharacteristic of the historic context. Do not design a project which leaves no useful open space visible from the street. 1.4 Design a new driveway or improve an existing driveway in a manner that minimizes its visual impact. •If an alley exists at the site, the new driveway must be located off it. •Tracks, gravel, light grey concrete with minimal seams, or similar materials are appropriate for driveways on Aspen Victorian properties. 1.5 Maintain the historic hierarchy of spaces. •Reflect the established progression of public to private spaces from the public sidewalk to a semi- public walkway, to a semiprivate entry feature, to private spaces. 1.6 Provide a simple walkway running perpendicular from the street to the front entry on residential projects. •Meandering walkways are not allowed, except where it is needed to avoid a tree or is typical of the period of significance. •Use paving materials that are similar to those used historically for the building style and install them in the manner that they would have been used historically. For example on an Aspen Victorian landmark set flagstone pavers in sand, rather than in concrete. Light grey concrete, brick or red sandstone are appropriate private walkway materials for most landmarks. •The width of a new entry sidewalk should generally be three feet or less for residential properties. A wider sidewalk may be appropriate for an AspenModern property. 1.7 Provide positive open space within a project site. •Ensure that open space on site is meaningful and consolidated into a few large spaces rather than many small unusable areas. •Open space should be designed to support and complement the historic building. 1.8 Consider stormwater quality needs early in the design process. •When included in the initial planning for a project, stormwater quality facilities can be better integrated into the proposal. All landscape plans presented for HPC review must include at least a preliminary representation of the stormwater design. A more detailed design must be reviewed and approved by Planning and Engineering prior to building permit submittal. •Site designs and stormwater management should provide positive drainage away from the historic landmark, preserve the use of natural drainage and treatment systems of the site, reduce the generation of additional stormwater runoff, and increase infiltration into the ground. Stormwater facilities and conveyances located in front of a landmark should have minimal visual impact when viewed from the public right of way. •Refer to City Engineering for additional guidance and requirements. 15 Page 5 of 13 1.10 Built-in furnishings, such as water features, fire pits, grills, and hot tubs, that could interfere with or block views of historic structures are inappropriate. •Site furnishings that are added to the historic property should not be intrusive or degrade the integrity of the neighborhood patterns, site, or existing historic landscape. •Consolidating and screening these elements is preferred. 1.11 Preserve and maintain historically significant landscaping on site, particularly landmark trees and shrubs. •Retaining historic planting beds and landscape features is encouraged. •Protect historically significant vegetation during construction to avoid damage. Removal of damaged, aged, or diseased trees must be approved by the Parks Department. •If a significant tree must be removed, replace it with the same or similar species in coordination with the Parks Department. •The removal of non-historic planting schemes is encouraged. •Consider restoring the original landscape if information is available, including original plant materials. 2.1 Preserve original building materials. •Do not remove siding that is in good condition or that can be repaired in place. •Masonry features that define the overall historic character, such as walls, cornices, pediments, steps and foundations, should be preserved. •Avoid rebuilding a major portion of an exterior wall that could be repaired in place. Reconstruction may result in a building which no longer retains its historic integrity. •Original AspenModern materials may be replaced in kind if it has been determined that the weathering detracts from the original design intent or philosophy. 2.2 The finish of materials should be as it would have existed historically. •Masonry naturally has a water-protective layer to protect it from the elements. Brick or stone that was not historically painted shall not be painted. •If masonry that was not painted historically was given a coat of paint at some more recent time, consider removing it, using appropriate methods. •Wood should be painted, stained or natural, as appropriate to the style and history of the building. 2.3 Match the original material in composition, scale and finish when replacing materials on primary surfaces. •If the original material is wood clapboard for example, then the replacement material must be wood as well. It should match the original in size, and the amount of exposed lap and finish. •Replace only the amount required. If a few boards are damaged beyond repair, then only those should be replaced, not the entire wall. For AspenModern buildings, sometimes the replacement of a larger area is required to preserve the integrity of the design intent. 2.4 Do not use synthetic materials as replacements for original building materials. •Original building materials such as wood siding and brick should not be replaced with synthetic materials. 2.5 Covering original building materials with new materials is inappropriate. 16 Page 6 of 13 •Regardless of their character, new materials obscure the original, historically significant material. •Any material that covers historic materials may also trap moisture between the two layers. This will cause accelerated deterioration to the historic material which may go unnoticed. 3.1 Preserve the functional and decorative features of a historic window. •Features important to the character of a window include its frame, sash, muntins/mullions, sills, heads, jambs, moldings, operations, and groupings of windows. •Repair frames and sashes rather than replacing them. •Preserve the original glass. If original Victorian era glass is broken, consider using restoration glass for the repair. 3.2 Preserve the position, number, and arrangement of historic windows in a building wall. •Enclosing a historic window is inappropriate. •Do not change the size of an original window opening. 3.3 Match a replacement window to the original in its design. •If the original is double-hung, then the replacement window must also be double-hung. If the sash has divided lights, match that characteristic as well. 3.4 When replacing an original window, use materials that are the same as the original. 3.5 Preserve the size and proportion of a historic window opening. •Changing the window opening is not permitted. •Consider restoring an original window opening that was enclosed in the past. 3.6 Match, as closely as possible, the profile of the sash and its components to that of the original window. •A historic window often has a complex profile. Within the window’s casing, the sash steps back to the plane of the glazing (glass) in several increments. These increments, which individually only measure in eighths or quarters of inches, are important details. They distinguish the actual window from the surrounding plane of the wall. •The historic profile on AspenModern properties is typically minimal. 4.1 Preserve historically significant doors. •Maintain features important to the character of a historic doorway. These include the door, door frame, screen door, threshold, glass panes, paneling, hardware, detailing, transoms and flanking sidelights. •Do not change the position and function of original front doors and primary entrances. •If a secondary entrance must be sealed shut, any work that is done must be reversible so that the door can be used at a later time, if necessary. Also, keep the door in place, in its historic position. •Previously enclosed original doors should be reopened when possible. 17 Page 7 of 13 4.2 Maintain the original size of a door and its opening. •Altering its size and shape is inappropriate. It should not be widened or raised in height. 4.3 When a historic door or screen door is damaged, repair it and maintain its general historic appearance. 4.4 When replacing a door or screen door, use a design that has an appearance similar to the original door or a door associated with the style of the building. •A replica of the original, if evidence exists, is the preferred replacement. •A historic door or screen door from a similar building also may be considered. •Simple paneled doors were typical for Aspen Victorian properties. •Very ornate doors, including stained or leaded glass, are discouraged, unless photographic evidence can support their use. 4.5 Adding new doors on a historic building is generally not allowed. •Place new doors in any proposed addition rather than altering the historic resource. •Greater flexibility in installing a door in a new location may be considered on rear or secondary walls. •A new door in a new location should be similar in scale and style to historic openings on the building and should be a product of its own time. •Preserve the historic ratio of openings to solid wall on a façade. Significantly increasing the openings on a character defining façade negatively affects the integrity of a structure. 4.7 Preserve historic hardware. •When new hardware is needed, it must be in scale with the door and appropriate to the style of the building. •On Aspen Victorian properties, conceal any modern elements such as entry keypads. 5.1 Preserve an original porch or balcony. •Replace missing posts and railings when necessary. Match the original proportions, material and spacing of balusters. •Expanding the size of a historic porch or balcony is inappropriate**(HPC to review for this Project) 5.2 Avoid removing or covering historic materials and details. •Removing an original balustrade, for example, is inappropriate. 5.3 Enclosing a porch or balcony is not appropriate. •Reopening an enclosed porch or balcony is appropriate. 5.4 If reconstruction is necessary, match the original in form, character and detail. •Match original materials. 18 Page 8 of 13 •When reconstructing an original porch or balcony without historic photographs, use dimensions and characteristics found on comparable buildings. Keep style and form simple with minimal, if any, decorative elements. 5.5 If new steps are to be added, construct them out of the same primary materials used on the original, and design them to be in scale with the porch or balcony •Steps should be located in the original location. •Step width should relate to the scale of entry doors, spacing between posts, depth of deck, etc. •Brick, red sandstone, grey concrete, or wood are appropriate materials for steps. 5.6 Avoid adding handrails or guardrails where they did not exist historically, particularly where visible from the street. •If handrails or guardrails are needed according to building code, keep their design simple in character and different from the historic detailing on the porch or balcony. 6.1 Preserve significant architectural features. •Repair only those features that are deteriorated. •Patch, piece-in, splice, or consolidate to repair the existing materials, using recognized preservation methods whenever possible. •On AspenModern properties, repair is preferred, however, it may be more important to preserve the integrity of the original design intent, such as crisp edges, rather than to retain heavily deteriorated material. 6.2 When disassembly of a historic element is necessary for its restoration, use methods that minimize damage to the original material. •Document its location so it may be repositioned accurately. Always devise methods of replacing the disassembled material in its original configuration. 6.3 Remove only the portion of the detail that is deteriorated and must be replaced. •Match the original in composition, scale, and finish when replacing materials or features. •If the original detail was made of wood, for example, then the replacement material should be wood, when feasible. It should match the original in size and finish. 6.4 Repair or replacement of missing or deteriorated features are required to be based on original designs. •The design should be substantiated by physical or pictorial evidence to avoid creating a misrepresentation of the building’s heritage. •When reconstruction of an element is impossible because there is no historical evidence, develop a compatible new design that is a simplified interpretation of the original, and maintains similar scale, proportion and material. 6.5 Do not guess at “historic” designs for replacement parts. 19 Page 9 of 13 •Where scars on the exterior suggest that architectural features existed, but there is no other physical or photographic evidence, then new features may be designed that are similar in character to related buildings. •Using ornate materials on a building or adding new conjectural detailing for which there is no documentation is inappropriate. 7.1 Preserve the original form of a roof. •Do not alter the angle of a historic roof. Preserve the orientation and slope of the roof as seen from the street. •Retain and repair original and decorative roof detailing. •Where the original roof form has been altered, consider restoration. 7.2 Preserve the original eave depth. •Overhangs contribute to the scale and detailing of a historic resource. •AspenModern properties typically have very deep or extremely minimal overhangs that are key character defining features of the architectural style. • 7.3 Minimize the visual impacts of skylights and other rooftop devices. •Skylights and solar panels are generally not allowed on a historic structure. These elements may be appropriate on an addition. 7.4 New vents should be minimized, carefully, placed and painted a dark color. •Direct vents for fireplaces are generally not permitted to be added on historic structures. •Locate vents on non-street facing facades. •Use historic chimneys as chases for new flues when possible. 7.5 Preserve original chimneys, even if they are made non-functional. •Reconstruct a missing chimney when documentation exists. 7.7 Preserve original roof materials. •Avoid removing historic roofing material that is in good condition. When replacement is necessary, use a material that is similar to the original in both style as well as physical qualities and use a color that is similar to that seen historically. 7.8 New or replacement roof materials should convey a scale, color and texture similar to the original. •If a substitute is used, such as composition shingle, the roof material should be earth tone and have a matte, non-reflective finish. •Flashing should be in scale with the roof material. •Flashing should be tin, lead coated copper, galvanized or painted metal and have a matte, non- reflective finish. •Design flashing, such as drip edges, so that architectural details are not obscured. 20 Page 10 of 13 •A metal roof is inappropriate for an Aspen Victorian primary home but may be appropriate for a secondary structure from that time period. •A metal roof material should have a matte, non-reflective finish and match the original seaming. 7.10 Design gutters so that their visibility on the structure is minimized to the extent possible. •Downspouts should be placed in locations that are not visible from the street if possible, or in locations that do not obscure architectural detailing on the building. •The material used for the gutters should be in character with the style of the building. 10.3 Design a new addition such that one’s ability to interpret the historic character of the primary building is maintained. •A new addition must be compatible with the historic character of the primary building. •An addition must be subordinate, deferential, modest, and secondary in comparison to the architectural character of the primary building. •An addition that imitates the primary building’s historic style is not allowed. For example, a new faux Victorian detailed addition is inappropriate on an Aspen Victorian home. •An addition that covers historically significant features is inappropriate. •Proposals on corner lots require particular attention to creating compatibility. 10.4 The historic resource is to be the focus of the property, the entry point, and the predominant structure as viewed from the street. •The historic resource must be visually dominant on the site and must be distinguishable against the addition. •The total above grade floor area of an addition may be no more than 100% of the above grade floor area of the original historic resource. All other above grade development must be completely detached. HPC may consider exceptions to this policy if two or more of the following are met: o The proposed addition is all one story o The footprint of the new addition is closely related to the footprint of the historic resource and the proposed design is particularly sensitive to the scale and proportions of the historic resource o The project involves the demolition and replacement of an older addition that is considered to have been particularly detrimental to the historic resource o The interior of the resource is fully utilized, containing the same number of usable floors as existed historically o The project is on a large lot, allowing the addition to have a significant setback from the street o There are no variance requests in the application other than those related to historic conditions that aren’t being changed o The project is proposed as part of a voluntary AspenModern designation, or o The property is affected by non-preservation related site-specific constraints such as trees that must be preserved, Environmentally Sensitive Areas review, etc. 10.6 Design a new addition to be recognized as a product of its own time. •An addition shall be distinguishable from the historic building and still be visually compatible with historic features. 21 Page 11 of 13 •A change in setbacks of the addition from the historic building, a subtle change in material, or a modern interpretation of a historic style are all techniques that may be considered to help define a change from historic construction to new construction. •Do not reference historic styles that have no basis in Aspen. •Consider these three aspects of an addition; form, materials, and fenestration. An addition must relate strongly to the historic resource in at least two of these elements. Departing from the historic resource in one of these categories allows for creativity and a contemporary design response. •Note that on a corner lot, departing from the form of the historic resource may not be allowed. •There is a spectrum of appropriate solutions to distinguishing new from old portions of a development. Some resources of particularly high significance or integrity may not be the right instance for a contrasting addition. 10.8 Design an addition to be compatible in size and scale with the main building. •An addition that is lower than, or similar to the height of the primary building, is preferred. 10.9 If the addition is taller than a historic building, set it back from significant façades and use a “connector” to link it to the historic building. •Only a one-story connector is allowed. •Usable space, including decks, is not allowed on top of connectors unless the connector has limited visibility and the deck is shielded with a solid parapet wall. •In all cases, the connector must attach to the historic resource underneath the eave. •The connector shall be a minimum of 10 feet long between the addition and the primary building. •Minimize the width of the connector. Ideally, it is no more than a passage between the historic resource and addition. The connector must reveal the original building corners. The connector may not be as wide as the historic resource. •Any street-facing doors installed in the connector must be minimized in height and width and accessed by a secondary pathway. See guideline 4.1 for further information. 10.10 Place an addition at the rear of a primary building or set it back substantially from the front to minimize the visual impact on the historic structure and to allow the original proportions and character to remain prominent. •Locating an addition at the front of a primary building is inappropriate. •Additions to the side of a primary building are handled on a case-by-case basis and are approved based on site specific constraints that restrict rear additions. •Additional floor area may also be located under the building in a basement which will not alter the exterior mass of a building. 10.11 Roof forms shall be compatible with the historic building. •A simple roof form that does not compete with the historic building is appropriate. •On Aspen Victorian properties, a flat roof may only be used on an addition to a gable roofed structure if the addition is entirely one story in height, or if the flat roofed areas are limited, but the addition is primarily a pitched roof. 10.12 Design an addition to a historic structure that does not destroy or obscure historically important architectural features. •Loss or alteration of architectural details, cornices, and eave lines must be avoided. 22 Staff Finding: The applicable sections of the design guidelines are as follows: site planning, building materials, windows, doors, roofs, porches, building additions, accessibility, architectural lighting, and mechanical equipment. All relevant Design Guidelines in Chapter 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 10 and 12 related to the preservation plan need to be reviewed in detail as part of the permit submittals. These chapters will be conditions of final approval. Site and Landscape: Design Guideline 1.6, 1.8, & 1.10 are specific guidelines regarding the site issues needing review. As decided by HPC at the previous meeting, this mid- century modern is to be reviewed with some specific considerations of the time and period of the home. The current entrance is not the original, but restoration does not need to be considered. A pathway leading from the street directly to the entrance is also part of the design guideline that does not need to be applied to this home. In addition to a detailed preservation plan, HPC will want to address the historic resource in the form of gutters, curb heights, landscape materials, path lighting, diminished driveway options, and other similar features. All the features need to be compatible with historic features, and located in areas with the least visual impact when viewing the historic resource. The application includes a secondary entry at the North elevation to accommodate entry from the new garage, which meets the design guidelines. Site will need a study for storm water mitigation, and any additional site features associated with it as stated in 1.8. This will need additional review by the Engineering department at the time of final review. All criteria has been met. . Exterior Elements: Design Guidelines 2.1, 2.2, 2.3, 2.5 and 6.1 address proposed changes in the exterior materials on the East elevation of the historic structure. All previous new materials have been removed. All criteria has been met. Windows and Doors: Design Guidelines 2.1, 3.1-3.6 and 4.5 address the various issues with historic window and door removal, replacement, and changes to the opening size and location on the historic structure. Historic windows must be retained as character defining features, and on landmarked structures missing historic elements must be restored. The historic shutters are a character defining features, critical both to the Chalet style and to the specific historic resource. The shutters are expected to be retained, with any missing shutters to be restored. If any additional design elements, such as original decorative fascia boards, balusters, etc. are found to be damaged or missing, these would also be expected to be restored to the original configuration and match materials in kind as stated by criteria 2.1. Door changes are called out in criterial 4.5, requiring original doors to remain doors, and any new doors to be part of additions. All criteria has been met. Page 12 of 13 23 Roof: Design Guidelines 7.3, 7.5, 7.7 and 7.10 address the roof, chimney, gutters, and downspouts. 7.3 criteria require skylights and solar panels to be located on additions, new construction, and secondary structures. New roof penetrations are to be limited to vents and flues, commonly combined at one point of penetration whenever possible. While historic chimneys are protected, new chimneys are not encouraged as they are highly visible changing the character of the roof and cause an addition large roof penetration. The more roof alterations, the more loss of historic materials that are critical to the landmarked structure’s integrity. Roof trusses are considered part of the exterior and are thus protected, as are all exterior walls and foundations. HPC indicated at the last meeting that this structure could eligible for the limited use of skylights. All criteria has been met. New Garage Addition: Design Guidelines 10.4- 10.12 are relevant to the proposed addition of the one car garage, located off the alleyway. It is designed to be compatible in size/scale with the historic home. It has a minimal footprint and the design strikes a balance between contemporary and historic features with both form and materials. Fenestration does not match the design of the Chalet style of the main house. Additional information is needed regarding materials to be reviewed for compatibility. Staff finds the design of the new addition to be appropriate and in compliance with relevant design guidelines. In addition, please review Chapter 12 of the design guidelines when designating locations for all utilities, lighting, etc. These details will need to be part of the Major Conceptual design, while aspects may be allowed to be reviewed at final or in the field, such as final specifications for fixtures and materials. In summary, staff recommends approval. Page 13 of 13 24 Exhibit B Referral Comments Engineering Parks Zoning Building Engineering Department Comments Wyatt Young HPC Refferal Project 312 W Hyman All comments have been addressed: 1.For Major redevelopment all ROW needs to be brought into compliance. 2.Remove railroad ties and existing driveway. 3.New access needs to be off of the alleyway. 4.Sidewalk needs to be installed along W. Hyman. Parks Department Comments David Radeck HPC Referral Project 312 W Hyman All comments have been addressed: Tree protection measures will be required at the driplines of trees and no activity whatsoever is allowed within this area without the express written consent of the City Forester or his designee. Zoning Department Comments Sophie Varga HPC Referral Project 312 W Hyman All comments have been addressed: 1.Provide a zoning summary sheet. 2.Provide a compliant survey – requirements can be found here: 1. https://www.cityofaspen.com/DocumentCenter/View/516/Compliant-COA-Survey-PDF 2.Lot size: Per the survey provided, the lot is 5,976 SF (gross). The application states that the lot size is 6,000 SF (gross). Please update this number to accurately reflect the gross lot size wherever it is listed. The site coverage requirements are not triggered due to the size of the lot. 3. Setbacks: a.The minimum distance between detached buildings on the lot is applicable. Please show the 5’ setback between the detached buildings. b.The combined side yard setback is 15’ with a 5’ minimum size for each side yard. A variation for the combined side yard setback requirement needs to be requested. Please amend the application to reflect this. It appears that the proposed condition will be a combined side yard setback of ~5’. The combined side yard setback is not staggered. Please refer to 26.575.020(e)(4).25 c.The deck is projecting further into the east side yard setback than the structure. Please update the application to reflect this non-conforming condition. d.The garage is shown as meeting the 5’ side yard setback and 5’ rear yard setback. Why is a variance requested for a 0’ setback on the western property line? 4.Provide demolition calculations. 5. Parking: a.Only one parking space is provided; two are required. How will the second parking space be provided? 6.Floor Plans: Please clearly label existing and proposed plans. 7.The hot tub shown on the second story deck is between a street and a structure. This is prohibited per 26.575.020(e)(m). Please remove the hot tub from the street facing deck. 8.Elevations: Please update the scale and refer to the Residential Zoning Checklist. 9.Floor area calculations: Please refer to the resources linked above for guidance on what is required for floor area calculations. Please reach out if you have any questions. I cannot verify existing or proposed floor area at this time. 10.Roof plan: please provide an existing roof plan. 11.Exterior lighting: is any exterior lighting proposed? If so, please provide a plan showing the exterior lighting locations as well as the cutsheets of proposed lights. Building Department Comments Bonnie Muhigirwa HPC Referral Project 312 W Hyman All comments have been addressed: 1.New exterior walls less than 5 feet from the property line will require 1-hour fire-resistance rating. (2015 IRC Table R302.1) 2.Hot tub on 2nd story deck will need to be set back at least 18 inches from the edge of the deck or the guardrail will need to be extended 18 inches above the edge of the spa per City of Aspen policy. https://www.cityofaspen.com/DocumentCenter/View/6202/Hot-Tub-and- Spa-Safety-Railings 26 Land Use Application City of Aspen Historic Preservation Commission 27 April 2022 Location: 312 W. Hyman Avenue, Aspen, CO (PID# 273512464006) Prepared by: Jeffrey Woodruff, for PowderDaySkiing, LLC An application for Major Development and Historic Preservation Benefits to remodel an AspenModern designated residence and provide a detached garage. 27 PROJECT OVERVIEW This application is submitted on behalf of POWDERDAYSKIING LLC (the “Applicant”) for the property located at 312 W. Hyman Avenue, Aspen, Colorado, Parcel ID# 273512464006 (the “Property”). The Applicant seeks Major Development approval to remodel the existing AspenModern historically designated single-family residence, provide a detached garage, and make improvements to the landscape to enhance the visual characteristics of the historic resource. This application is submitted in conformance with the Pre-application Conference Summary dated 23 August 2021. An initial conceptual design review was held on 26 January 2022, presented by the applicant and a representative for the applicant. A public hearing is schedule for 27 April 2022, continuing the conceptual design, with direction from the HPO and HPC on restudying the fenestration, elevations, landscaping, grading and lighting with respect to historic context and the promotion of the chalet style in Aspen. Property Background The Property survey for Lots P + Q Block 46 at 5,976+- SF and is located in the Medium-Density Residential (R-6), as per Sec. 26.710.040. Per the R-6, maximum allowable floor area is 3,240 SF for single-family residence. The existing residence contains approximately 1,669 SF of floor area. Based on this, approximately 1,571 SF of additional floor area could potentially be added. The existing single-family residence construction was completed in 1956 and is a representation of the “Chalet” style of architecture in Aspen. The house was constructed by Genevieve Birlauf Leininger and Julius Herman Birlauf. The Birlauf’s would arrive by rail to Aspen, their arrival noticed in the The Aspen Times and the Aspen Daily Times and the Rocky Mountain Sun in the 1950’s and 1960’s. The Aspen Times chronicled their travels to Aspen, Arkansas, Massachusetts and California. JH Birlauf on one trip traveled 5000 miles and visited 16 cities. Genevieve married Joseph Leininger, who served with the Department of Defense in Vienna through 1955. The single family house has seen several rounds of exterior modifications by the Birlauf family, primarily consisting of fenestration modifications. The Property was historically designated in 2006 and the City of Aspen considers the existing residence to be an excellent example of the Chalet style of architecture which was commonly associated with early ski areas in the United States. The Property has had three owners. Genevieve sold the Property in 1986 to Jordan “Jordie” Gerberg. Jordie sold the Property to the City of Aspen at which time the Property was historically designated. Ordinance No. 45, Series of 2006 Designated 312 West Hyman Avenue, Lots P and Q, Block 46 City and Townsite of Aspen, Colorado to the Landmark to the Aspen Inventory of Historic Landmark and Sites and Structures During the City’s ownership, interior remodeling has occurred, including the addition of a new kitchen on the ground floor, replacement, or repair of exterior features such as decks and patios, and a new roof and gutters added. The Applicant purchased 312 West Hyman Avenue, Lots P and Q, Block 46 (Property) from the City. Proposed Remodel, consistent with Historic Preservation Design Guidelines The Applicant wishes to update and provide improvements to the existing residence, in order to function more appropriately and comfortably for his family. The history as a family home and the story of the construction of the residence was an important factor in the purchase of the Property and the Applicant looks forward to ensuring this AspenModern resource is preserved and lived in for many years to come, while further respecting the historic character of the structure and its relationship to the site and landscape. Following are the proposed modifications to be made to the residence: •A small two-story addition on the north façade is proposed to provide additional seating, storage, and living space; inspired by Hotel Post, remaining in the building footprint, under the existing the North and East eaves. Hotel Post features in Friedel Pfeifer’s autobiography and Pfeifer credits the Austrian Chalet’s influence in Aspen building design. •A new wrap-around deck on the northeastern corner of the residence will allow additional outdoor access. •A new entry on the west facade, using the existing rough opening, matching the historic divided light windows (a main entry door and sidelights). •Removal of the dropped ceiling, exposing the cold roof and providing energy updates (batt insulation, removal of the cold attic), removal of the attic vents and replacement with hoppers (no change in visual appearance on the North or South Facades, as the Romeo and Juliet balcony is untouched). HPC Major Development / 312 W. Hyman Avenue / Parcel ID# 273512464006 April 2022 | Page 3 28 •New windows are proposed to be installed throughout the residence which will enhance thermal performance and energy efficiency and allow more light into the interior of the residence; Infrared photography demonstrates the current performance of the single-pane sieves; leading both the poor thermal performance and excess moisture potentially speeding up decay of the sills and building envelope. •Three (half of the original proposal) new flush-mounted skylights will be added to the roof to provide light to the upper level living space; •The remaining garage space on the ground level will be converted to bedrooms; habitable spaces to capture the views of Shadow Mountain; people over automobiles. •A new detached garage with roof mounted solar, energy storage and ski storage and trash enclosure will be located immediately off of the (North) alley; a permeable surface to connect the alley and the new garage; •The client has agreed to a 5’ sidewalk on the south extent of the property and/or to sign a sidewalk agreement. The applicant will work with the HPO on the details required to traverse the historic driveway, maintaining the character of the angled approach and its relationship to the structure. The HPO and applicant, as well as the City Forester and Parks, remain concerned about the tree drip zone of the blue spruce (South of the structure), the existing historic driveway alignment and the need for a hardscape/ sidewalk- when the neighboring parcels are head-in 90 degree parking hardscape. •Air spading in order to protect the remaining conifers on the North property line in conjunction with the City Forester and City Parks. Removal of Tree #1 (good shape) and Tree #2 (fair shape, would be removed with Tree #2). •New landscaping and outdoor gathering areas will be provided to compliment the historic resource. The ground level will contain two habitable spaces bedrooms and the upper level one habitable space (three bedrooms total). The new addition on the north and east façades will “tuck” under the existing eaves, be minimally visible, and blend into the chalet-style architecture. The fenestration is designed to match the existing divided light patterns, and the rough openings are consistent with the fenestration pattern of the historic resource. A new interior staircase will replace the basement like stair approach today, with a code standard rise-run and landing. With the relocation of the garage, the existing mechanical and garage space on the ground level of the residence will be converted to bedrooms. The existing garage doors, will be maintained visually and historically. They will be converted to allow outdoor access from the two of the bedrooms on the ground level and provide for code required egress from the new bedrooms. Sliding doors will be placed behind the garage doors. Therefore, the historic use pattern of vehicular access directly off of Hyman Avenue will still be recognized and appreciated by passing pedestrians. The new detached garage located in the North East corner of the with entry off of the alley, meeting City of Aspen Residential Design Standards, will provide parking for a single vehicle. The garage will contain storage and incorporate a trash enclosure. A second off-street space will be provided via the existing south driveway (remaining permeable). The applicant will use permeable materials, such as gravel, connecting the alley to the single car garage, and in accordance with the site requirements of the City Forester. The landscape will feature a rustic, mountain aesthetic evocative of an alpine setting. A two-track driveway will be maintained and employed to recall the historic vehicular use of the front yard while also minimizing the impacts of vehicles parked in front of the historic resource. Vehicles will still be able to use the two-track for parking. A rustic steppingstone path will provide access to the front door, to the West of the current driveway and blue spruce, connecting the askew residence to the street. Garden areas employing a native alpine plant palette will provide visual interest and help ground the historic resource. A private exterior patio space will be provided in the northeastern corner of the rear yard, hidden from view from the street, to take advantage of the southern exposure and views to Aspen Mountain. The landscaping will observe Fire Wise construction techniques, creating a defensible space to the residence, avoiding wood chips and keeping branches (working with the City Forester and City Parks) away from the residence. HPC Major Development / 312 W. Hyman Avenue / Parcel ID# 273512464006 April 2022 | Page 4 29 So variance requested A side yard setback variance has been requested for the detached garage. The City of Aspen, Zoning in the R-6 zone district is for a combined fifteen foot setback (is the code today). The existing askew primary residence is 2.4’ from the property boundary and the deck overhang is even less compliant with the current land use code. The proposed detached garage is five feet from the North, residential design standard -five foot rear setback (is met), and five feet from the West property lines (five foot side setback, but not compliant with today’s land use code in the R-6 zone district). We are proposing locating the garage and trash enclosure at 5’ from the West property line. Therefore we are requesting a variance for the 15’ combined side yard setback for the for the purpose of constructing a garage. This 5’ West setback would also have the least impact on the mature conifers (#3, 4, and 5) and the utility service in the neighborhood (North Eastern part of the lot contains multiple utility connections). The garage location would improve sight lines for the property owner to the North and minimize any impact on the St Moritz. The St Moritz has an approximately six foot high retaining wall on the Western property line, so a single story garage with a 12.5’ ridge line would minimally impact the sight lines from the hotel to the alley. There are no changes/impact to the structure where it projects further into the East side yard (any structural work to this part of the deck etc). The East side of the deck is moving North, not East, so no further encroachment into the East setback. Floor Area The proposed additions represent a very small amount of additional floor area. The garage contains a total of 308 SF. Utilizing the garage exemptions for a detached garage located off of alley, 29 SF of the garage will contribute to floor area. The two additions to the north and east façades will add square footage as per the Zoning Sheets, 48 square feet to the north on the main floor and 64 feet on the second level, and 39 to the east on the main floor. The new proposed decks, with the existing deck space included, represent 311 + 52 (new deck to the North East) for a total of 363 SF which is less than the 15% of maximum floor area allowed exempt from floor area (486 SF = 3,240 * .15). Planning a Preservation Project The Applicant appreciates the efforts to date by the Historic Preservation Commission, Historic Preservation Officer and the City of Aspen’s departments in connection with the proposed remodel and protection and preservation of this Aspen Historic resource. Summary The owner is responsible for both the benefits accrued to the historic character of the resource and its beautiful setting. The owner wishes to improve the artifacts in need of restoration and enhance the character and livability of the historic resource. HPC Major Development / 312 W. Hyman Avenue / Parcel ID# 273512464006 April 2022 | Page 5 30 SHEET TITLE INTEGRATED DESIGN TEAM PROJECT NO: MODEL FILE: DRAWN BY: COPYRIGHT: SHEET 1 A001 Jeffrey H Woodruff 312_W_Hyman_04272022.pln Project No. 116 /Users/jeffreyw/Documents/Cloud Hill Design/312 W Hyman/312_W_Hyman_04272022.plnPowder Day Skiiing, LLC, David A Tarrab Mees Cover Sheet 312 W Hyman Ave 312 W Hyman Ave Lots P+Q, Block 46 Aspen CO 81611 USA/ Pitkin County UGB, City of Aspen 312 W Hyman Ave Aspen CO 81611 USA Account # R000145 Parcel ID # 273512464006 Landscape Architect Jennifer M. Dolecki-Smith, RLA Escape Garden Design, LLC Interior Design Travis Terry Travis Terry Design Contractor (At Final) Structural Engineer (As per contractor) Civil Grading and Drainage Boundaries Unlimited (Preliminary) COA- HPO Site Visit08/22/21 Jeffrey H. Woodruff AIA, LEED AP Cloud Hill Design, LLC Snowmass Snowmass CO 81654 USA COA- HPC Conceptual02/26/22 COA- HPC Conceptual04/27/22 SHEET INDEX A001 V1 V2 C1 L100 Z001 Z002 Z003 Z004 Z005 Z006 Z008 A101 A102 A103 A104 A105 A106 A107 A108 A200 A201 A203 A204 A210 A211 A300 A301 A500 A501 A600 A700 A900 A901 A903 Cover Sheet Improvement Survey Topographic Survey Plat Civil Site Grading and Drainage Landscape Architecture Floor Area Calculations Floor Area Calculations Height Measurements Wall Demolition Calculations Site Coverage Zoning Summary Forestry Site Coverage Architectural Site Plan Architectural Site Drainage Plan Main Level Proposed Plan Second Level Proposed Plan Roof Plan Proposed Main Level Existing Plan Second Level Existing Plan Roof Plan Existing Elevations Proposed Elevations Proposed Existing Elevations Existing Elevations Fence Layout Garage Elevations Transverse Sections Longitudinal Sections Schedules Schedules Assemblies HP HPO Materials Precedent Studies Restudy Required HPC 1.0 Relationship to Neighborhood 312 W H y m a n A.F.F. ADJ. ALT. A.B. & ARCH. @ BM. BM. PKT. BRG. BLK'G. BOT. B.F. BLDG. B.O. CAB. CLG. CL. C.T. CLR. COL. CONC. CONN. CONT. DTL. DBL. DWL. E.W. ELEV. OR EL. EXIST'G EXT. F.F. F.D. FLR. FTG. FND. GA. G.L. G.W.B. G.S. HB. HT. HK. HORIZ. HYD. ABOVE FINISH FLOOR ADJUSTABLE ALTERNATE ANCHOR BOLTS AND ARCHITECTURAL AT BEAM BEAM POCKET BEARING BLOCKING BOTTOM BOTTOM OF FOOTING BUILDING BY OWNER CABINET CEILING CENTER LINE CERAMIC TILE CLEAR COLUMN CONCRETE CONNECTION CONTINUOUS DETAIL DOUBLE DOWEL EACH WAY ELEVATION EXISTING EXTERIOR FINISHED FLOOR FLOOR DRAIN FLOOR FOOTING FOUNDATION GAUGE GLU-LAM GYPSUM WALL BOARD GAS STUB HOSE BIB HEIGHT HOOK HORIZONTAL HYDRANT INFO. INSUL. JST. L.L. LONGINT. N.I.C. O.C. OPP. O/ PTD. PERF. PL. PLY. PROP. LINE REINF. RDWD. REQ'D. RESIL. REV. S.M. SIM. S.F. OR SQ. FT. STD. STL. STDS. THK. TLT. T.F. T.P. T.L. T.W. TOT. T.B. TRANSV. TYP. U.N.O. V.I.F. VERT. V.W.C. W.C. W.H. W.P. W.R. WIN. W/ WD. INFORMATION INSULATION JOIST LIVE LOAD LONGITUDINAL NOT IN CONTRACT ON CENTER OPPOSITE OVER PAINTED PERFORATED PLATE PLYWOOD PROPERTY LINE REINFORCEMENT REDWOOD REQUIRED RESILIENT REVISED SHEET METAL SIMILAR SQUARE FEET STANDARD STEEL STUDS THICK TOILET TOP OF FOOTING TOP OF PLATE TOP OF LEDGE TOP OF WALL TOTAL TOWEL BAR TRANSVERSE TYPICAL UNLESS NOTED OTHERWISE VERIFY IN FIELD VERTICAL VINYL WALL COVERING WATER CLOSET WATER HEATER WATERPROOF WATER RESISTANT WINDOW WITH WOOD 312 W Hyman Ave Powder Day Skiiing, LLC, David A Tarrab Mees 312 W Hyman Ave Lots P+Q, Block 46 Aspen CO 81611 USA/Pitkin County UGB, City of Aspen PROJECT: Renovation, Energy Upgrades and Historic Preservation ADDRESS: 312 W Hyman Ave, Aspen, CO 81611 COUNTY: Pitkin County PARCEL NUMBER: 73512464006 PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Interior Renovation and Energy Upgrades, IECC Compliance ZONING: R6 Medium Density Residential CONSTRUCTION TYPE: VB OCCUPANCY GROUP: RESIDENTIAL FIRE PROTECTION: Non-sprinklered NUMBER OF STORIES: TWO ELEVATION 100= 7901.36' SITE 5976+- S.F. 1. CONTRACTOR TO COMPLY WITH CODES, LAWS, ORDINANCES, RULES, AND REGULATIONS OF PUBLIC AUTHORITIES GOVERNING THE WORK. 2. CONTRACTOR TO REVIEW DOCUMENTS, VERIFY DIMENSIONS AND FIELD CONDITIONS AND CONFIRM THAT WORK IS BUILDABLE AS SHOWN. CONTRACTOR TO REPORT ANY CONFLICTS OR OMISSIONS TO THE ARCHITECT FOR CLARIFICATION PRIOR TO PERFORMING ANY WORK IN QUESTION. 3. FOR SUBSTITUTIONS, REFER TO THE SPECIFICATIONS. 4. DO NOT SCALE DRAWINGS. DIMENSIONS SHALL TAKE PRECEDENCE OVER SCALES SHOWN ON DRAWINGS, GENERAL CONTRACTOR SHALL VERIFY ALL DIMENSIONS, GRADES AND CONDITIONS AT SITE PRIOR TO COMMENCING THE WORK. 5. MAINTAIN DIMENSIONS MARKED 'CLEAR'. ALLOW FOR THICKNESS OF FINISHES. 6. CEILING HEIGHT DIMENSIONS ARE TO FINISHED SURFACES. 7. CONTRACTOR TO COORDINATE AND PROVIDE BACKING FOR MILLWORK AND ITEMS ATTACHED OR MOUNTED TO WALLS OR CEILINGS. 8. EXCEPT WHERE SHOWN IN DIMENSIONAL DETAIL, THE LOCATIONS OF PLUMBING, MECHANICAL EQUIPMENT, DUCTS, PIPING AND FITTINGS ARE ONLY APPROXIMATE. THE EXACT LOCATIONS SHALL BE DETERMINED BY THE CONTRACTOR, SUBJECT TO APPROVAL BY THE ARCHITECT. 9. CONTRACTOR SHALL PROVIDE AND INSTALL ALL STIFFENERS, BRACING, BLOCKING, AND SUPPORTING BRACKETS REQUIRED FOR THE INSTALLATION OF ALL CASEWORK, TOILET ROOM ACCESSORIES, FIXTURES AND PARTITIONS AND ALL WALL MOUNTED OR SUSPENDED MECHANICAL, ELECTRICAL OR MISCELLANEOUS EQUIPMENT AND FURNISHINGS. 10. ALL WORK PERFORMED SHALL COMPLY WITH THE CONTRACT DOCUMENTS, DRAWINGS, SPECIFICATIONS, AND GEOTECHNICAL INVESTIGATION AND PAVEMENT RECOMMENDATIONS. 11. SPECIFICATIONS, BOUND SEPARATELY, ARE PART OF THE CONTRACT DOCUMENTS. 12. ALL MATERIALS AND WORKMANSHIP SHALL CONFORM TO THE DRAWINGS AND SPECIFICATIONS. IF CONFLICT IS FOUND BETWEEN DRAWINGS, GENERAL NOTES AND SPECIFICATIONS, CONSULT THE ARCHITECT BEFORE PROCEEDING WITH THE WORK. 13. THE STRUCTURAL, MECHANICAL AND ELECTRICAL DRAWINGS ARE SUPPLEMENTARY TO THE ARCHITECTURAL DRAWINGS. IT SHALL BE THE RESPONSIBILITY OF THE CONTRACTOR TO CHECK WITH THE ARCHITECTURAL DRAWINGS BEFORE THE INSTALLATION OF STRUCTURAL, MECHANICAL AND ELECTRICAL WORK. SHOULD THERE BE A DISCREPANCY BETWEEN THE ARCHITECTURAL DRAWINGS AND THE CONSULTING ENGINEERS' DRAWINGS THAT WOULD CAUSE AN AWKWARD INSTALLATION, IT SHALL BE BROUGHT TO THE ARCHITECT'S AND ENGINEERS' ATTENTION FOR CLARIFICATION PRIOR TO THE INSTALLATION OF SAID WORK. 14. GENERAL NOTES ARE NOT A SUBSTITUTE NOR A REPLACEMENT FOR THE PROJECT SPECIFICATIONS. THESE NOTES ARE INTENDED AS A GUIDE TO THE DESIGN AND/OR CONSTRUCTION REQUIREMENTS ESTABLISHED FOR THIS PROJECT. 15. NO CONTRACTOR SHOULD ATTEMPT TO BID OR CONSTRUCT ANY PORTION OF THE WORK WITHOUT CONSULTING THE PROJECT SPECIFICATIONS. 16. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL COORDINATE THE INTENT OF THE GENERAL NOTES WITH ALL TRADES Snow-load: TBC PSF, Up to 8000' Elevation, Elevation is 7901.36' 100' as per Civil = 7901.36' Roof Duration = 1.0 Seismic Design Category = B or C, as per Figure R301.2 (2) As per soil design category Weathering probability for Concrete = Severe Termite Infestation Probability = None to slight Wind Speed = 115 mph (ultimate design) Wind Exposure = B or C, Section R301.2.1.4 Frost Depth = 36", TBC (up to 8000' Elevation) Air Freezing Index = TBC° F Days – Up to 8000 ft. elevation Ice Barrier Underlayment = Required Mean Annual Temp = variable Insulation = as per Minimum R-Values per 2009 IECC, Table 402.1.1, Client chooses to utilize stricter minimums as per 2018 IECC for thermal comfort and energy efficiency. As per State House Bill 09-1091, CO alarms are required within 15 feet of all sleeping rooms BUILDING Pitkin County Currently Adopted Codes. The client will conform with 2018 IECC (Assemblies and Fenestration) and the updated land use code for Energy Efficiency on Earth Day 2020. 2015 International Building Code 2015 International Residential Code 2015 International Mechanical Code 2015 International Plumbing Code 2015 International Fuel & Gas Code 2015 International Energy Conservation Code Pitkin County Efficient Building Code Most Current National Electrical Code Project summary and aims, as per Land Use Code: The historic building and the site remains key elements of the property and the new development does not compromise the visual integrity of the historic property; and The new construction is reflective of the proportional patterns found in the historic building's forms, materials and openings, or the work removes later alterations and restores the historic building to its appearance during its period of significance; and The project is compatible with the character of the neighborhood in which it is located; and Historic outbuildings site and landscape features are retained and stabilized and restored, as appropriate. 31 SHEET TITLE INTEGRATED DESIGN TEAM PROJECT NO: MODEL FILE: DRAWN BY: COPYRIGHT: SHEET 2 V1 Jeffrey H Woodruff 312_W_Hyman_04272022.pln Project No. 116 /Users/jeffreyw/Documents/Cloud Hill Design/312 W Hyman/312_W_Hyman_04272022.plnPowder Day Skiiing, LLC, David A Tarrab Mees Improvement Survey 312 W Hyman Ave 312 W Hyman Ave Lots P+Q, Block 46 Aspen CO 81611 USA/ Pitkin County UGB, City of Aspen 312 W Hyman Ave Aspen CO 81611 USA Account # R000145 Parcel ID # 273512464006 Landscape Architect Jennifer M. Dolecki-Smith, RLA Escape Garden Design, LLC Interior Design Travis Terry Travis Terry Design Contractor (At Final) Structural Engineer (As per contractor) Civil Grading and Drainage Boundaries Unlimited (Preliminary) COA- HPO Site Visit08/22/21 Jeffrey H. Woodruff AIA, LEED AP Cloud Hill Design, LLC Snowmass Snowmass CO 81654 USA COA- HPC Conceptual02/26/22 COA- HPC Conceptual04/27/22 (S75°1 1 ' 0 9 " E 6 0 . 0 0 ' ) S75°14 ' 5 8 " E 5 8 . 5 9 ' E E E G (N14°50'49"E 100.00')N15°05'12"E 99.90' S14°50'49"W 100.00'N75°09 ' 1 1 " W 6 0 . 0 0 ' BASIS O F B E A R I N G S FOUND NO. 5 REBAR FOUND NO. 5 REBAR FOUND NO. 5 REBAR SET FOUND NO. 5 REBAR & 1-1/4" ORANGE PLASTIC CAP PROP CORNER TNC PLS38215 (20.90' W I D E ) GRAVE L A L L E Y ALLEY - B L O C K 4 6 LOT P LOT Q LOT O LOT N LOT R LOT S W. HY M A N A V E N U E (74.80' W I D E P U B L I C ) SE CORNER BLOCK 46 FOUND REBAR & 1-1/2" ALUMINUM CAP (NO STAMPING) N75°09 ' 1 1 " W 5 9 . 9 2 ' (60.00' ) 33.4' 4.0' 4.9' 8.3' 5.5' 11.5' 0.7' 0.7'2.2'0.8' 0.7' 0.7'0.8'2.2'9.2'0.8'0.8'38.4'21.2'7.2'11.1' ( T I E )19.8'(TIE)0.8' 2.4' (TIE)13.4'5.5' APPARENT ENCROACHMENT DRIVEWAY & WOOD RETAINING GRAVEL DRIVEWAYWOOD RETAININGWOOD RETAININGAPPARENT ENCROACHMENT R.R.TIE WALL CONCRETE APRO N UPPER DECK STEPS FLAGSTONE PATIO SIDEWALK2 - STORY FRAME HOUSE 312 WEST HYMAN AVENUE 5976± SQ.FT.NEIGHBORING RESIDENCECONCR E T E C U R B & G U T T E R PAVED R O A D W A Y MAILB O X 4.4' APPARENT ENCROACHMENT WOOD RETAINING ELECTRIC PEDESTAL CATV PEDESTAL TELEPHONE PEDESTAL GAS METER ELECTRICAL METER G LEGEND E SURVEYOR'S CERTIFICATION SURVEY NOTES: LOTS P & Q - BLOCK 46, CITY AND TOWNSITE OF ASPEN SECTION 12, TOWNSHIP 10 SOUTH, RANGE 85 WEST OF THE 6TH PM COUNTY OF PITKIN, STATE OF COLORADO IMPROVEMENT SURVEY PLAT TRUE NORTH COLORADO LLC. A LAND SURVEYING AND MAPPING COMPANY PO BOX 614 - 529 S. WILD HORSE DRIVE NEW CASTLE, COLORADO 81647 (970) 984-0474 www.truenorthcolorado.com PROJECT NO: 2019-104 DATE: JANUARY 18, 2019 DRAWN RPK SURVEYED LDV SHEET 1 OF 1 TRUENORTH A LAND SURVEYING AND MAPPING COMPANY 8'4'16' SCALE: 1" = 8' N PROPERTY DESCRIPTION:0 SCHEDULE B PART II TITLE EXCEPTIONS: 32 SHEET TITLE INTEGRATED DESIGN TEAM PROJECT NO: MODEL FILE: DRAWN BY: COPYRIGHT: SHEET 3 V2 Jeffrey H Woodruff 312_W_Hyman_04272022.pln Project No. 116 /Users/jeffreyw/Documents/Cloud Hill Design/312 W Hyman/312_W_Hyman_04272022.plnPowder Day Skiiing, LLC, David A Tarrab Mees Topographic Survey Plat 312 W Hyman Ave 312 W Hyman Ave Lots P+Q, Block 46 Aspen CO 81611 USA/ Pitkin County UGB, City of Aspen 312 W Hyman Ave Aspen CO 81611 USA Account # R000145 Parcel ID # 273512464006 Landscape Architect Jennifer M. Dolecki-Smith, RLA Escape Garden Design, LLC Interior Design Travis Terry Travis Terry Design Contractor (At Final) Structural Engineer (As per contractor) Civil Grading and Drainage Boundaries Unlimited (Preliminary) COA- HPO Site Visit08/22/21 Jeffrey H. Woodruff AIA, LEED AP Cloud Hill Design, LLC Snowmass Snowmass CO 81654 USA COA- HPC Conceptual02/26/22 COA- HPC Conceptual04/27/22 L M K F G H I B C D E (S7 5 ° 1 1 ' 0 9 " E 6 0 . 0 0 ' ) S7 5 ° 1 4 ' 5 8 " E 5 8 . 5 9 ' E EG (N14°50'49"E 100.00') N15°05'12"E99.90' S14°50'49"W 100.00'N75 ° 0 9 ' 1 1 " W 6 0 . 0 0 ' BA S I S O F B E A R I N G S FOUND N O . 5 R E B A R FOUND N O . 5 R E B A R FOUND N O . 5 R E B A R SITE BEN C H M A R K SET FOU N D N O . 5 R E B A R & 1-1/4" OR A N G E P L A S T I C C A P PROP CO R N E R T N C P L S 3 8 2 1 5 ELEVATI O N : 7 9 0 0 . 8 4 (20. 9 0 ' W I D E ) GR A V E L A L L E Y ALL E Y BL O C K 4 6 LO T P LO T Q LO T O LO T N LO T R LO T S W. H Y M A N A V E N U E (74. 8 0 ' W I D E P U B L I C ) SE CORN E R BLOCK 4 6 FOUND R E B A R & 1 - 1 / 2 " ALUMINU M C A P (NO STA M P I N G ) N75 ° 0 9 ' 1 1 " W 5 9 . 9 2 ' (60. 0 0 ' ) 33.4' 4.0' 4.9' 8.3' 5.5'11.5'0.7' 0.7'2.2'0.8' 0.7' 0.7'0.8'2.2'9.2'0.8'0.8'38.4'21.2'7.2'11. 1 ' ( T I E )19.8'(TIE)0.8'2.4' (TIE )13.4'5.5' APPAREN TENCROA C H M E N TDRIVEWA Y & WOOD R E T A I N I N G GRAVEL DRIVEWA YWOOD RETAININGWOOD RETAININGAPPAREN T ENCROA C H M E N T R.R. TIE WALL CONCRETE APRON UPPER DECK STEPS FLAGSTO N E PATIO SIDEWALK2 - STOR Y FRAME H O U S E & GARAGE312 WES T H Y M A N A V E N U E 0.137± A C R E S5976± SQ . F T .NEIGHBORING RESIDENCECO N C R E T E C U R B & G U T T E R PAV E D R O A D W A Y MAI L B O X 4.4' APPAREN T ENCROA C H M E N T WOOD R E T A I N I N G OS WN6 7 ° 5 3 ' 3 3 " W 1 2 3 7 . 0 4 ' ( T I E ) CITY OF A S P E N GPS MO N U M E N T # 7 CITY OF A S P E N GPS MO N U M E N T # 6 ELEVATI O N : 7 8 9 3 . 6 1 S86°19' 5 1 " E 8 1 8 . 1 0 ' ( T I E ) 1 2 3 4 5 678 9 10 11 121314 15 16 GARAGE 7901.31 FFE 7901.36 FFE 7901.33 SOUTH 2nd STREET(74.62' WIDE PUBLIC)79047903 790279017901 7901 790179 0 2 7902 79037 9 0 3 7 9 0 4 10' R E A R S E T B A C K - P R I N C I P A L B U I L D I N G 5' R E A R S E T B A C K - P R I N C I P A L B U I L D I N G U S E D A S G A R A G E & A C C E S S O R Y B U I L D I N G 5' MINIMUM SIDE SETBACK5' MINIMUM SIDE SETBACK10' F R O N T S E T B A C K PRI N C I P A L B U I L D I N G 15' F R O N T S E T B A C K AC C E S S O R Y B U I L D I N G ELECTRIC PEDESTAL CATV PEDESTAL OSW WATER SHUTOFF WATER LINE SEWER LINE TELEPHONE LINE GAS LINE CATV LINE UNDERGROUND ELECTRIC LINE TELEPHONE PEDESTAL GAS METER ELECTRICAL METER G LEGEND E SURVEYOR'S CERTIFICATION I, RODNEY P. KISER, HEREBY CERTIFY TO HENRY LAMBERT & CAREY BOND THAT THIS IS AN "IMPROVEMENT SURVEY PLAT" AS DEFINED BY C.R.S.38-51-102(9) AND THAT IT IS A MONUMENTED LAND SURVEY PERFORMED UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION AND RESPONSIBLE CHARGE SHOWING THE LOCATION OF ALL STRUCTURES, VISIBLE UTILITIES, FENCES, HEDGES, OR WALLS SITUATED ON THE DESCRIBED PARCEL AND WITHIN FIVE FEET OF ALL BOUNDARIES OF SUCH PARCEL, ANY CONFLICTING BOUNDARY EVIDENCE OR VISIBLE ENCROACHMENTS, AND ALL EASEMENTS, UNDERGROUND UTILITIES, AND TUNNELS DESCRIBED IN THE ATTORNEYS TITLE INSURANCE AGENCY OF ASPEN, LLC COMMITMENT FOR TITLE INSURANCE COMMITMENT NO. 18003943, OR OTHER SOURCES AS SPECIFIED ON THE IMPROVEMENT SURVEY PLAT. LINEAR ERROR OF CLOSURE IS LEES THAN 1:15,000. RODNEY P. KISER LICENSED PROFESSIONAL LAND SURVEYOR COLORADO REGISTRATION NO. 38215 SURVEY NOTES: 1. BASIS OF BEARINGS FOR THIS SURVEY IS A BEARING OF N75°09'11"W BETWEEN A FOUND NO. 5 REBARS AS SHOWN HEREON. 2. DATE OF FIELD SURVEY: JANUARY 15, 2019 AND JANUARY 25, 2019. AT THE TIME OF THE FIELD SURVEY THERE WAS 4"+ OF SNOW ON THE GROUND. 3. LINEAR UNITS USED TO PERFORM THIS SURVEY WERE U.S. SURVEY FEET. 4. THIS SURVEY IS BASED ON THE OFFICIAL MAP OF THE CITY OF ASPEN DATED DECEMBER 18, 1959 AS RECEPTION NO. 109043, THE PLAT OF RESUBDIVIDED LOTS K, L, M, N, O, BLOCK 46 RECORDED JANUARY 15, 1982 IN PLAT BOOK 12 AT PAGE 54 AND CORNERS FOUND IN PLACE AS SHOWN HEREON. 5. THIS IMPROVEMENT SURVEY PLAT DOES NOT CONSTITUTE A TITLE SEARCH BY TRUE NORTH COLORADO, LLC, FOR ALL INFORMATION REGARDING EASEMENT, RIGHTS-OF-WAY AND/OR TITLE OF RECORD, TRUE NORTH COLORADO, LLC. RELIED UPON TITLE COMMITMENT NO. 18003943 ISSUED BY ATTORNEYS TITLE INSURANCE AGENCY OF ASPEN, LLC, EFFECTIVE DATE: JANUARY 22, 2019. 6. BEARINGS AND DISTANCES SHOWN HEREON ARE BASED ON FIELD MEASUREMENTS. BEARINGS AND DISTANCES SHOWN IN PARENTHESIS ARE OF RECORD SHOWN ON THE OFFICIAL MAP OF THE CITY OF ASPEN DATED NOVEMBER 16, 1959. 7. THE SUBJECT PROPERTY LIES WITHIN FLOOD ZONE X WHICH ARE AREAS DETERMINED TO BE OUTSIDE THE 500-YEAR FLOOD PLAIN) ACCORDING TO FEMA FLOOD INSURANCE RATE MAP COMMUNITY PANEL NO. 08097C0203C WITH AN EFFECTIVE DATE OF JUNE 4, 1987. 8. THERE ARE NO NATURAL HAZARDS THAT EXIST ON THE SUBJECT PROPERTY. 9. NATURAL SLOPES ARE BETWEEN 0% TO 15% OVER THE ENTIRE SITE. 10. BASED ON 1958 CITY OF ASPEN TOPOGRAPHY THE SUBJECT PROPERTY DOES NOT APPEAR TO BE MANIPULATED FROM HISTORIC GRADE. LOTS P & Q - BLOCK 46, CITY AND TOWNSITE OF ASPEN SECTION 12, TOWNSHIP 10 SOUTH, RANGE 85 WEST OF THE 6TH PM COUNTY OF PITKIN, STATE OF COLORADO IMPROVEMENT & TOPOGRAPHICSURVEY PLAT YEARS FROM THE DATE OF CERTIFICATION SHOWN HEREON. AFTER YOU FIRST DISCOVER SUCH DEFECT. IN NO EVENT MAY ANY ACTION ACTION BASED UPON ANY DEFECT IN THIS SURVEY WITHIN THREE YEARS BASED UPON ANY DEFECT IN THIS SURVEY BE COMMENCED MORE THAN TEN NOTICE: ACCORDING TO COLORADO LAW YOU MUST COMMENCE ANY LEGAL TRUE NORTH COLORADO LLC. A LAND SURVEYING AND MAPPING COMPANY PO BOX 614 - 529 S. WILD HORSE DRIVE NEW CASTLE, COLORADO 81647 (970) 984-0474 www.truenorthcolorado.com PROJECT NO: 2019-115 DATE: FEBRUARY 1, 2019 RPK LDV 1 OF 1 TRUE NORTH COLORADO A LAND SURVEYING AND MAPPING COMPANY HENRY LAMBERT & CAREY BOND IMPROVEMENT & TOPOGRAPHIC SURVEY PLAT LOTS P & Q - BLOCK 46 CITY OF ASPEN COUNTY OF PITKIN - STATE OF COLORADO 8'4'16' SCALE: 1" = 8' N 0 TREE TYPE SIZE DRIP TREE CHART 1 2 30"40' 16"32' CONIFEROUS CONIFEROUS 3 22"32'CONIFEROUS 4 20"30' 5 6 6"12' 7 8" 8 16'9 10 40"40'CONIFEROUS11 12 ASPEN 13 ASPEN 14 ASPEN 15 ASPEN 16 16"32'ASPEN CONIFEROUS 24"30'CONIFEROUS ASPEN ASPEN ASPEN 16' 16' 8" 8"ASPEN 16"32'ASPEN 8"16' 6"12' 8"16' 8"16' ZONING: CITY OF ASPEN LAND USE CODE: R-6 SETBACKS FRONT YARD: PRINCIPAL BUILDINGS: 10 FEET ACCESSORY BUILDINGS: 15 FEET REAR YARD: PRINCIPAL BUILDINGS: 10 FEET PRINCIPAL BUILDING USED SOLELY AS GARAGE: 5 FEET ACCESSORY BUILDINGS: 5 FEET SIDE YARD: MINIMUM: 5 FEET 10 FEET, PLUS 1 FOOT FOR EACH ADDITIONAL 300 SQUARE FEET OF GROSS LOT AREA, TO A MAXIMUM OF 15 FEET OF TOTAL SIDE YARD 33 SHEET TITLE INTEGRATED DESIGN TEAM PROJECT NO: MODEL FILE: DRAWN BY: COPYRIGHT: SHEET 4 C1 Jeffrey H Woodruff 312_W_Hyman_04272022.pln Project No. 116 /Users/jeffreyw/Documents/Cloud Hill Design/312 W Hyman/312_W_Hyman_04272022.plnPowder Day Skiiing, LLC, David A Tarrab Mees Civil Site Grading and Drainage 312 W Hyman Ave 312 W Hyman Ave Lots P+Q, Block 46 Aspen CO 81611 USA/ Pitkin County UGB, City of Aspen 312 W Hyman Ave Aspen CO 81611 USA Account # R000145 Parcel ID # 273512464006 Landscape Architect Jennifer M. Dolecki-Smith, RLA Escape Garden Design, LLC Interior Design Travis Terry Travis Terry Design Contractor (At Final) Structural Engineer (As per contractor) Civil Grading and Drainage Boundaries Unlimited (Preliminary) COA- HPO Site Visit08/22/21 Jeffrey H. Woodruff AIA, LEED AP Cloud Hill Design, LLC Snowmass Snowmass CO 81654 USA COA- HPC Conceptual02/26/22 COA- HPC Conceptual04/27/22 E E G WSOD2.0%6.5%2.6%1 1 1 FF: 7901.31' FF: 7901.31'FF:7901.33'FF:7901.36'D#3000 7901.31' #3001 7899.35' #3002 7901.36' #3003 7901.37' #3004 7901.08' #3005 7900.88' #3006 7901.17' #3007 7901.15' #3008 7901.18' #3009 7901.13' 1 + 0 0 1+331+001+25Point Table Point # 3000 3001 3002 3003 3004 3005 3006 3007 3008 3009 Raw Description EX. FG EX. FG EX. FG PR. FG PR. FG PR. FG PR. FG EX. FG EX. FG EX. FG Elevation 7901.31' 7899.35' 7901.36' 7901.37' 7901.08' 7900.88' 7901.17' 7901.15' 7901.18' 7901.13' Northing 14948.98 14947.21 14980.65 14986.35 15008.62 15002.86 14981.51 14979.33 14966.89 14951.93 Easting 14907.26 14889.23 14885.17 14887.05 14883.87 14932.86 14927.19 14913.62 14917.42 14922.287904790379027901 7901 79017901 790279037902 7901 7901 7902WQCV/DETENTION DRYWELL SYSTEM RIM: TBD (SEE DETAIL) 12"Ø DOME GRATE 5' OFF BUILDING, TYP. RIM: 6" LOWER THAN FG AT FOUNDATION AND 12"± BELOW FOUNDATION TOP OF WALL 12"Ø SQ.ADA AREADRAIN 12 LF TRENCH DRAIN WITH HEAT TAPERIM: 7901.08' CONNECT TO STORM DRAIN LINE 50 LF 6"Ø SOLID SCH.40 PVC @ 1.0% MIN.WITH HEAT TAPE 80 LF 6"Ø SOLID SCH.40 PVC @ 1.0% MIN.WITH HEAT TAPE SCALE: 1' = 1'-0" 1 Draft Civil Grading and Drainage, NFC C1 Civil Grading and Drainage will be provided at Final Review. This is for placement only, pending conceptual approval. 34 SHEET TITLE INTEGRATED DESIGN TEAM PROJECT NO: MODEL FILE: DRAWN BY: COPYRIGHT: SHEET 5 L100 Jeffrey H Woodruff 312_W_Hyman_04272022.pln Project No. 116 /Users/jeffreyw/Documents/Cloud Hill Design/312 W Hyman/312_W_Hyman_04272022.plnPowder Day Skiiing, LLC, David A Tarrab Mees Landscape Architecture 312 W Hyman Ave 312 W Hyman Ave Lots P+Q, Block 46 Aspen CO 81611 USA/ Pitkin County UGB, City of Aspen 312 W Hyman Ave Aspen CO 81611 USA Account # R000145 Parcel ID # 273512464006 Landscape Architect Jennifer M. Dolecki-Smith, RLA Escape Garden Design, LLC Interior Design Travis Terry Travis Terry Design Contractor (At Final) Structural Engineer (As per contractor) Civil Grading and Drainage Boundaries Unlimited (Preliminary) COA- HPO Site Visit08/22/21 Jeffrey H. Woodruff AIA, LEED AP Cloud Hill Design, LLC Snowmass Snowmass CO 81654 USA COA- HPC Conceptual02/26/22 COA- HPC Conceptual04/27/22 35 SHEET TITLE INTEGRATED DESIGN TEAM PROJECT NO: MODEL FILE: DRAWN BY: COPYRIGHT: SHEET 6 Z001 Jeffrey H Woodruff 312_W_Hyman_04272022.pln Project No. 116 /Users/jeffreyw/Documents/Cloud Hill Design/312 W Hyman/312_W_Hyman_04272022.plnPowder Day Skiiing, LLC, David A Tarrab Mees Floor Area Calculations 312 W Hyman Ave 312 W Hyman Ave Lots P+Q, Block 46 Aspen CO 81611 USA/ Pitkin County UGB, City of Aspen 312 W Hyman Ave Aspen CO 81611 USA Account # R000145 Parcel ID # 273512464006 Landscape Architect Jennifer M. Dolecki-Smith, RLA Escape Garden Design, LLC Interior Design Travis Terry Travis Terry Design Contractor (At Final) Structural Engineer (As per contractor) Civil Grading and Drainage Boundaries Unlimited (Preliminary) COA- HPO Site Visit08/22/21 Jeffrey H. Woodruff AIA, LEED AP Cloud Hill Design, LLC Snowmass Snowmass CO 81654 USA COA- HPC Conceptual02/26/22 COA- HPC Conceptual04/27/22 5,976 sq ft 789 sq ft 41 sq ft 16 sq ft 269 sq ft A A B B C C D D E E 4 4 3 3 2 2 1 1 The Site is 5,976 Square Feet. The built environment is 1,091 Residence (Attached Garage Included in site square footage) 41 Square Feet Storage- East 16 Square Feet Storage- North The existing site coverage is 1,148/5,976 = 19.21%10' R E A R S E T B A C K - P R I N C I P A L B U I L D I N G 5' R E A R S E T B A C K - P R I N C I P A L B U I L D I N G U S E D A S G A R A G E & A C C E S S O R Y B U I L D I N G 5' MINIMUM SIDE SETBACK5' MINIMUM SIDE SETBACK10' F R O N T S E T B A C K PRI N C I P A L B U I L D I N G 15' F R O N T S E T B A C K ACC E S S O R Y B U I L D I N G 10' R E A R S E T B A C K - P R I N C I P A L B U I L D I N G 5' R E A R S E T B A C K - P R I N C I P A L B U I L D I N G U S E D A S G A R A G E & A C C E S S O R Y B U I L D I N G 880 sq ft A A B B C C D D E E 4 4 3 3 2 2 1 1 301 sq ft 60 sq ft Floor Area Calculations City of Aspen 312 W Hyman Zoning Submission Existing Main Level Floor Area Calculations Main Level Gross Floor Area (Sq Ft)824 Garage is 269 Sq Ft, attached Main Level Countable Floor Area (Sq Ft)1,091 Existing Deck/Porch Floor Area Calculations 301 Exempt per 26.575.020.D5, Structural Stairs 60 Sq Ft Front Porch Gross Floor Area (Sq Ft)301 Exempt per 15% of allowable, 15% of 3,240 = 486 Deck/Porch Countable Floor Area (Sq Ft)0 Total Existing Floor Area Calculations Sub-grade Floor Area (Sq Ft)0 Lower Level Floor Area (Sq Ft)880 Main Level Floor Area (Sq Ft)789 Subtracted Stairs at upper level Deck/Porch Floor Area (Sq Ft)0 Total Existing Floor Area (Sq Ft 1,669 1 N SCALE: 1/8" = 1'-0" 2 Existing Main Level Floor Area Z001 SCALE: 1/8" = 1'-0" 3 Existing Second Level Floor Area Z001 36 SHEET TITLE INTEGRATED DESIGN TEAM PROJECT NO: MODEL FILE: DRAWN BY: COPYRIGHT: SHEET 7 Z002 Jeffrey H Woodruff 312_W_Hyman_04272022.pln Project No. 116 /Users/jeffreyw/Documents/Cloud Hill Design/312 W Hyman/312_W_Hyman_04272022.plnPowder Day Skiiing, LLC, David A Tarrab Mees Floor Area Calculations 312 W Hyman Ave 312 W Hyman Ave Lots P+Q, Block 46 Aspen CO 81611 USA/ Pitkin County UGB, City of Aspen 312 W Hyman Ave Aspen CO 81611 USA Account # R000145 Parcel ID # 273512464006 Landscape Architect Jennifer M. Dolecki-Smith, RLA Escape Garden Design, LLC Interior Design Travis Terry Travis Terry Design Contractor (At Final) Structural Engineer (As per contractor) Civil Grading and Drainage Boundaries Unlimited (Preliminary) COA- HPO Site Visit08/22/21 Jeffrey H. Woodruff AIA, LEED AP Cloud Hill Design, LLC Snowmass Snowmass CO 81654 USA COA- HPC Conceptual02/26/22 COA- HPC Conceptual04/27/22 5,976 sq ft 1,210 sq ft 489 sq ft 393 sq ft 760 sq ft 656 sq ft 272 sq ft 465 sq ft 1,081 sq ft A A B B C C D D E E 4 4 3 3 2 2 1 1 5'-0 1 / 6 4 "11'-3 3/4"308 sq ft Garden Storage (Under Stairs) Stairs Sq Footage Counted on Second Floor Growth commensurate with converting garage to habitable space Wall @ 4'-6" height to add to bedroom/habitable space under stairs, counted at 100% Sq Ft. 5' Set Back 10' R E A R S E T B A C K - P R I N C I P A L B U I L D I N G 5' R E A R S E T B A C K - P R I N C I P A L B U I L D I N G U S E D A S G A R A G E & A C C E S S O R Y B U I L D I N G 5' MINIMUM SIDE SETBACK5' MINIMUM SIDE SETBACK10' F R O N T S E T B A C K PRI N C I P A L B U I L D I N G 15' F R O N T S E T B A C K ACC E S S O R Y B U I L D I N G 952 sq ft 52 sq ft 311 sq ft 59 sq ft A A B B C C D D E E 4 4 3 3 2 2 1 1 Exterior Structural Stairs Counted on 2nd Floor Exterior Deck (Extended to the North) New Exterior Deck (North East) Down Floor Area Calculations City of Aspen 312 W Hyman Zoning Submission Proposed Main Level Floor Area Calculations Main Level Gross Floor Area (Sq Ft)1,210 Garage converted to habitable Main Level Countable Floor Area (Sq Ft)1,210 Table 26.575.020-2,Size of Garage or Carport First 0 to 250 square feet Proposed Deck/Porch Floor Area Calculations Front Porch Gross Floor Area (Sq Ft)363 Exempt per 15% of allowable, 15% of 3,240 = 486, Front deck is 311 and Rear Deck is 52, so 311 + 52 = 363 Deck/Porch Countable Floor Area (Sq Ft)0 Exempt per 26.575.020.D5 Structural Steps Floor Area (Sq Ft)59 Exempt per 26.575.020.D5, as per Assessor, exterior steps Deck/Porch Countable Floor Area (Sq Ft)0 Exempt per 15% of allowable 3240 *.15 = 486, 363 < 486 Total Existing Floor Area Calculations Sub-grade Floor Area (Sq Ft)0 Lower Level Floor Area (Sq Ft)1,210 Garage converted to habitable, extend habitable to the N and E Main Level Floor Area (Sq Ft)952 Extend floor plate to the North Total Proposed Floor Area (Sq Ft)2,162 Allowed is 3,240 SF Garage above 250, Square footage as per Next 251 to 500 square feet, 70 SF counts last 35 SF to F 29 Garage is 308 SF, so .5(58) = 29 2,191 Max floor area = 3,240 1,049 Remaining floor area = 3,240 - 2,191 = 1,049 Trash container is exempt Storage under the stairs is exempt Exterior stairs are exempt as per LUC 1 N SCALE: 1/8" = 1'-0" 1 Proposed Main Level Floor Area Z002 SCALE: 1/8" = 1'-0" 2 Second Floor- Floor Area Z002 37 SHEET TITLE INTEGRATED DESIGN TEAM PROJECT NO: MODEL FILE: DRAWN BY: COPYRIGHT: SHEET 8 Z003 Jeffrey H Woodruff 312_W_Hyman_04272022.pln Project No. 116 /Users/jeffreyw/Documents/Cloud Hill Design/312 W Hyman/312_W_Hyman_04272022.plnPowder Day Skiiing, LLC, David A Tarrab Mees Height Measurements 312 W Hyman Ave 312 W Hyman Ave Lots P+Q, Block 46 Aspen CO 81611 USA/ Pitkin County UGB, City of Aspen 312 W Hyman Ave Aspen CO 81611 USA Account # R000145 Parcel ID # 273512464006 Landscape Architect Jennifer M. Dolecki-Smith, RLA Escape Garden Design, LLC Interior Design Travis Terry Travis Terry Design Contractor (At Final) Structural Engineer (As per contractor) Civil Grading and Drainage Boundaries Unlimited (Preliminary) COA- HPO Site Visit08/22/21 Jeffrey H. Woodruff AIA, LEED AP Cloud Hill Design, LLC Snowmass Snowmass CO 81654 USA COA- HPC Conceptual02/26/22 COA- HPC Conceptual04/27/22 ±0" 1 First Floor ±0" 1 First Floor +9'-3" 2 Second Floor +9'-3" 2 Second Floor +18'-3" 3 Roof +18'-3" 3 Roof 19'-3"11'-9"9'-0" 22'-1 5/16" 23'-10" 25'-0" 12'-3" Existing WoodNew Wood Existing Opening Existing Wood Existing CMU Existing CMU New Stucco New Standing Seam Existing Grade (Most Restrictive) Existing Chimney Cap, Match Height Ridge Detached Garage ±0" 1 First Floor ±0" 1 First Floor +9'-3" 2 Second Floor +9'-3" 2 Second Floor +18'-3" 3 Roof +18'-3" 3 Roof 18'-3 1/ 2 " 19'-7 1/16"19'-7 1/16"25'-0"Existing Grade (Most Restrictive) SCALE: 1/4" = 1'-0" 2 West Elevation Height Z003 SCALE: 1/4" = 1'-0" 3 Existing South Elevation Z003 Zoning Note: Height Measurement (Z002): since the ridge line of the structure is below the height maximum, this works. 38 SHEET TITLE INTEGRATED DESIGN TEAM PROJECT NO: MODEL FILE: DRAWN BY: COPYRIGHT: SHEET 9 Z004 Jeffrey H Woodruff 312_W_Hyman_04272022.pln Project No. 116 /Users/jeffreyw/Documents/Cloud Hill Design/312 W Hyman/312_W_Hyman_04272022.plnPowder Day Skiiing, LLC, David A Tarrab Mees Wall Demolition Calculations 312 W Hyman Ave 312 W Hyman Ave Lots P+Q, Block 46 Aspen CO 81611 USA/ Pitkin County UGB, City of Aspen 312 W Hyman Ave Aspen CO 81611 USA Account # R000145 Parcel ID # 273512464006 Landscape Architect Jennifer M. Dolecki-Smith, RLA Escape Garden Design, LLC Interior Design Travis Terry Travis Terry Design Contractor (At Final) Structural Engineer (As per contractor) Civil Grading and Drainage Boundaries Unlimited (Preliminary) COA- HPO Site Visit08/22/21 Jeffrey H. Woodruff AIA, LEED AP Cloud Hill Design, LLC Snowmass Snowmass CO 81654 USA COA- HPC Conceptual02/26/22 COA- HPC Conceptual04/27/22 467 sq ft39 sq ft 535 sq ft 7 sq ft±0" 1 First Floor ±0" 1 First Floor +9'-3" 2 Second Floor +9'-3" 2 Second Floor +18'-3" 3 Roof +18'-3" 3 Roof 25 sq ft 14 sq ft 14 sq ft 11 sq ft 5 sq ft 76 sq ft The existing wall is 535 Square Feet. The reduction for fenestration is 91 Square Feet The wall area is 444 Square Feet. Demolition on the North Elevation, net of fenestration, is 376 Square Feet. A B 22 sq ft 20 sq ft95 sq ft 84 sq ft389 sq ft 70 sq ft 35 sq ft 32 sq ft 10 sq ft 13 sq ft 95 sq ft456 sq ft 83 sq ft 20 sq ft 20 sq ft±0" 1 First Floor ±0" 1 First Floor +9'-3" 2 Second Floor +9'-3" 2 Second Floor +18'-3" 3 Roof +18'-3" 3 Roof The existing wall is 654 Square Feet. The reduction for fenestration is 90 Square Feet The wall area is 564 Square Feet. Demolition on the East Elevation is 84+20 = 104 Square Feet, net of fenestration. C D EF 404 sq ft 35 sq ft 35 sq ft 10 sq ft 56 sq ft 56 sq ft 598 sq ft ±0" 1 First Floor ±0" 1 First Floor +9'-3" 2 Second Floor +9'-3" 2 Second Floor +18'-3" 3 Roof +18'-3" 3 Roof The existing wall is 598 Square Feet. The reduction for fenestration is 192 Square Feet The wall area is 406 Square Feet. No demolition on the South Facade 536 sq ft 22 sq ft 22 sq ft 10 sq ft 10 sq ft48 sq ft 647 sq ft 19 sq ft 48 sq ft ±0" 1 First Floor +9'-3" 2 Second Floor +18'-3" 3 Roof The existing wall is 647 Square Feet. The reduction for fenestration is 111 Square Feet The wall area is 536 Square Feet. The total demolition on the West Facade is 19 Square Feet. Demoltion Calculations City of Aspen 312 West Hyman Zoning Submission Wall Demolition Wall Label Individual Wall Area (Sq Ft) Area Reduced or Fenestration (Sq Ft) Area of Wall to be Removed (Sq Ft) A- North Wall 535 69 390 B- North Wall 39 24 15 C- East Wall 95 10 85 D- East Wall 20 0 20 E- East Wall 83 13 0 F- East Wall 456 67 0 G- South Wall 598 194 0 I- West Wall 647 111 67 Wall Surface Area Total (Sq Ft)2473 Area Reduced for Fenestration (Sq Ft)488 Area Used for Demo Calculation 577 Demolition Totals Roof and Wall Area Used for Demo Calculation (Sq Ft)577 Surface Area to be Removed (Sq Ft) Total 577 1 SCALE: 1/16" = 1'-0" 2 North Walls Wall A and Wall B Z004 SCALE: 1/16" = 1'-0" 3 East Walls Wall C and Wall D and Wall E Z004 SCALE: 1/16" = 1'-0" 4 South Walls F Z004 SCALE: 1/16" = 1'-0" 5 East Wall G Z004 39 SHEET TITLE INTEGRATED DESIGN TEAM PROJECT NO: MODEL FILE: DRAWN BY: COPYRIGHT: SHEET 10 Z005 Jeffrey H Woodruff 312_W_Hyman_04272022.pln Project No. 116 /Users/jeffreyw/Documents/Cloud Hill Design/312 W Hyman/312_W_Hyman_04272022.plnPowder Day Skiiing, LLC, David A Tarrab Mees Site Coverage 312 W Hyman Ave 312 W Hyman Ave Lots P+Q, Block 46 Aspen CO 81611 USA/ Pitkin County UGB, City of Aspen 312 W Hyman Ave Aspen CO 81611 USA Account # R000145 Parcel ID # 273512464006 Landscape Architect Jennifer M. Dolecki-Smith, RLA Escape Garden Design, LLC Interior Design Travis Terry Travis Terry Design Contractor (At Final) Structural Engineer (As per contractor) Civil Grading and Drainage Boundaries Unlimited (Preliminary) COA- HPO Site Visit08/22/21 Jeffrey H. Woodruff AIA, LEED AP Cloud Hill Design, LLC Snowmass Snowmass CO 81654 USA COA- HPC Conceptual02/26/22 COA- HPC Conceptual04/27/22 5,976 sq ft 1,211 sq ft 489 sq ft 393 sq ft 760 sq ft 656 sq ft 272 sq ft 465 sq ft 1,081 sq ft A A B B C C D D E E 4 4 3 3 2 2 1 1 5'-0 1 / 6 4 "11'-3 3/4"308 sq ft Garden Storage (Under Stairs) Stairs Sq Footage Counted on Second Floor Growth commensurate with converting garage to habitable space Wall @ 4'-6" height to add to bedroom/habitable space under stairs, counted at 100% Sq Ft. The Site is 5,976 Square Feet. The built environment is 1,196 Residence (For Square Footage Calculations: 1,196 + .5*58 Sq Ft) 29 Square Feet Storage, Exterior (Exempt) 32 Square Feet Trash Enclosure (Exempt) 308 Square Feet Garage (250 Sq Feet Exempt, 58 *.5 counts to Sq Ft. ) The new/proposed site coverage is 1,565/5,976 = 26.19% 5' Set Back 10' R E A R S E T B A C K - P R I N C I P A L B U I L D I N G 5' R E A R S E T B A C K - P R I N C I P A L B U I L D I N G U S E D A S G A R A G E & AC C E S S O R Y B U I L D I N G 5' MINIMUM SIDE SETBACK5' MINIMUM SIDE SETBACK10' F R O N T S E T B A C K PRI N C I P A L B U I L D I N G 15' F R O N T S E T B A C K ACC E S S O R Y B U I L D I N G Grav e l o f f alley 5,976 sq ft 789 sq ft 41 sq ft 16 sq ft 269 sq ft A A B B C C D D E E 4 4 3 3 2 2 1 1 Wall @ 4'-6" height to add to bedroom/habitable space under stairs, counted at 100% Sq Ft. The Site is 5,976 Square Feet. The built environment is 1,091 Residence (Attached Garage Included in site square footage) 41 Square Feet Storage- East 16 Square Feet Storage- North The existing site coverage is 1,148/5,976 = 19.21%10' R E A R S E T B A C K - P R I N C I P A L B U I L D I N G 5' R E A R S E T B A C K - P R I N C I P A L B U I L D I N G U S E D A S G A R A G E & AC C E S S O R Y B U I L D I N G 5' MINIMUM SIDE SETBACK5' MINIMUM SIDE SETBACK10' F R O N T S E T B A C K PRI N C I P A L B U I L D I N G 15' F R O N T S E T B A C K ACC E S S O R Y B U I L D I N G 10' R E A R S E T B A C K - P R I N C I P A L B U I L D I N G 5' R E A R S E T B A C K - P R I N C I P A L B U I L D I N G U S E D A S G A R A G E & AC C E S S O R Y B U I L D I N G N SCALE: 1/8" = 1'-0" 2 Proposed Site Coverage Z005 SCALE: 1/8" = 1'-0" 3 Existing Site Coverage Z005 40 SHEET TITLE INTEGRATED DESIGN TEAM PROJECT NO: MODEL FILE: DRAWN BY: COPYRIGHT: SHEET 11 Z006 Jeffrey H Woodruff 312_W_Hyman_04272022.pln Project No. 116 /Users/jeffreyw/Documents/Cloud Hill Design/312 W Hyman/312_W_Hyman_04272022.plnPowder Day Skiiing, LLC, David A Tarrab Mees Zoning Summary 312 W Hyman Ave 312 W Hyman Ave Lots P+Q, Block 46 Aspen CO 81611 USA/ Pitkin County UGB, City of Aspen 312 W Hyman Ave Aspen CO 81611 USA Account # R000145 Parcel ID # 273512464006 Landscape Architect Jennifer M. Dolecki-Smith, RLA Escape Garden Design, LLC Interior Design Travis Terry Travis Terry Design Contractor (At Final) Structural Engineer (As per contractor) Civil Grading and Drainage Boundaries Unlimited (Preliminary) COA- HPO Site Visit08/22/21 Jeffrey H. Woodruff AIA, LEED AP Cloud Hill Design, LLC Snowmass Snowmass CO 81654 USA COA- HPC Conceptual02/26/22 COA- HPC Conceptual04/27/22 Proposed Development Zoning Allowance and Project Summary City of Aspen 312 W Hyman Zoning Submission Proposed Development Single Family | Remodel Addition Parcel #273512464006 Zone District R6 Existing Allowed (Principal)Allowed (Accessory) Proposed (Principal) Proposed Accessory LUC Reference Setbacks 26.710.060 Front 19’-7”25’25’19’-7”n/a 26.710.060 Rear 33’-6”10’5’33’-6”5’26.710.060 Combined Front/Rear 26.710.060 East Side 2’-4”5’5’2’-4”5’26.710.060 West Side 11 2/3’10’10’11 2/3’5’26.710.040 Medium-Density Residential (R-6). Combined Side 15’15’15’7’-4”, No change to West Principal 5’, Variance Required for the West Garage D 4 is Minimum combined 10’ Distance between Buildings N/A N/A 11.07’, between the garage and the principal N/A 11.07’, between the garage and the principal 26.710.060 Corner Lot No No n/a No na/26.710.060 Floor Area (Square Feet)1,669 3,240 2,171 Supplemental Breakdown Info Existing Required Proposed LUC Reference Net Leasable/Comm (Sq Ft)Not Req for Residential N/A 26.575.020.I. Open Space %80.79%Not Req for R-6 73.81%26.710.060 Site Coverage 19.21%Not Req for R-6 26.19%26.710.060 On-Site Parking 2 2 2 26.515.030 Site Coverage Existing LUC Reference Gross Lot Area (Sq Ft)5,976 5,976 Z-007 Area of Building Footprint (Sq Ft)1148 1091+41+16 1,579 1210+29+32+308 26.575.020.G. Site Coverage 19.21%26.42% Land Value Summary Actual Value Land $3,200,000 Improvements $718,000 Total $3,918,000 1 41 SHEET TITLE INTEGRATED DESIGN TEAM PROJECT NO: MODEL FILE: DRAWN BY: COPYRIGHT: SHEET 12 Z008 Jeffrey H Woodruff 312_W_Hyman_04272022.pln Project No. 116 /Users/jeffreyw/Documents/Cloud Hill Design/312 W Hyman/312_W_Hyman_04272022.plnPowder Day Skiiing, LLC, David A Tarrab Mees Forestry Site Coverage 312 W Hyman Ave 312 W Hyman Ave Lots P+Q, Block 46 Aspen CO 81611 USA/ Pitkin County UGB, City of Aspen 312 W Hyman Ave Aspen CO 81611 USA Account # R000145 Parcel ID # 273512464006 Landscape Architect Jennifer M. Dolecki-Smith, RLA Escape Garden Design, LLC Interior Design Travis Terry Travis Terry Design Contractor (At Final) Structural Engineer (As per contractor) Civil Grading and Drainage Boundaries Unlimited (Preliminary) COA- HPO Site Visit08/22/21 Jeffrey H. Woodruff AIA, LEED AP Cloud Hill Design, LLC Snowmass Snowmass CO 81654 USA COA- HPC Conceptual02/26/22 COA- HPC Conceptual04/27/22 5,976 sq ft 488.75 sq ft 392.75 sq ft 760.25 sq ft 656.25 sq ft 271.75 sq ft 464.75 sq ft 1,081 sq ft 1 2 3 4 5 678 9 10 1112131415 16 10' F R O N T S E T B A C K PRI N C I P A L B U I L D I N G5' MINIMUM SIDE SETBACKSCALE: 1/8" = 1'-0" 1 First Floor- Tree Z008 Site Total 5,976+- SF Tree Protection Zone/Pervious Space North/East Trees 680.25 SF South State Tree 760.25 SF Tree Site Coverage 1,440.50 SF Tree Site % 24.10% Impervious Site Coverage Chalet 1210.75 SF Garage 307.5 SF Enclosure 32.25 SF Build out site 1550.50 Build out site % 25.95% Pervious Open Space North 1064.50 SF South East 488.75 SF South West 392.75 SF West Tree 464.75 SF * East Tree 271.75 SF * Open Space 2682.50 Open Space% 44.89% Pavers/skirt ~5.06 % * East and West Deciduous trees counted toward open space North West Garage/Trash Enclosure Strengths: º Aligned with existing site disturbance, the railroad tie retaining wall º Leaves the largest open space in the backyard º No/little impact to trees #3, #4 and #5 and no impact to Aspens along East property line º Does not interfere with existing utilities (maybe gas, but not electric) º Benefits to house across alley (north), views to Shadow Mountain º Minor negative to St Moritz, but ridge line is 12'-6" and grade steps down 3' grade (from the property line to the NE corner of the garage) and 6' retaining wall, so impact is negligible to St Moritz º Distance between the Garage and the Residence is 11', goes to 12' with the 2.5' side setback º Keep all trees, gravel between the alley and the garage º Distance between the property line and Tree #1 is 15'-7", if the neighboring retaining wall is plum and does not encroach on the West property line. Weaknesses: º Minimal impacts to Trees #1 and #2, development, both permeable and hardscape in the Tree #1 drip-line 13' from retaining wall to tree #1 (layout assumes less than 5' setback or additional/variance to combined side setback in R6. If the retaining wall was plum this measurement would be 15' º Impact to existing utilities, gas, which runs to the West and South of tree #1 º Difficult entry, entry from the East due to grade changes at the alley º Drainage 42 SHEET TITLE INTEGRATED DESIGN TEAM PROJECT NO: MODEL FILE: DRAWN BY: COPYRIGHT: SHEET 13 A101 Jeffrey H Woodruff 312_W_Hyman_04272022.pln Project No. 116 /Users/jeffreyw/Documents/Cloud Hill Design/312 W Hyman/312_W_Hyman_04272022.plnPowder Day Skiiing, LLC, David A Tarrab Mees Architectural Site Plan 312 W Hyman Ave 312 W Hyman Ave Lots P+Q, Block 46 Aspen CO 81611 USA/ Pitkin County UGB, City of Aspen 312 W Hyman Ave Aspen CO 81611 USA Account # R000145 Parcel ID # 273512464006 Landscape Architect Jennifer M. Dolecki-Smith, RLA Escape Garden Design, LLC Interior Design Travis Terry Travis Terry Design Contractor (At Final) Structural Engineer (As per contractor) Civil Grading and Drainage Boundaries Unlimited (Preliminary) COA- HPO Site Visit08/22/21 Jeffrey H. Woodruff AIA, LEED AP Cloud Hill Design, LLC Snowmass Snowmass CO 81654 USA COA- HPC Conceptual02/26/22 COA- HPC Conceptual04/27/22 1,210.5 sq ft A A B B C C D D E E 4 4 3 3 2 2 1 1 1.55 5 ' 2.40 6 '5.011'11.6 8 ' 8.167'10.167'10'4.25'9'11.749'19.25'5.00 1 '11.313'308 sq ft Proposed fence at the 5' side setback and 5' rear setback, lined on the South with shrubs, see landscaping plan St Moritz R e t a i n i n g w a l l ( e x i s t i n g and under r e h a b i l i t a t i o n ) Removal of T r e e s # 1 a n d # 2 Removal of T r e e s # 1 a n d # 2 E EG OS W7904790379027901 7901 7901 790179 0 2 7902 790379 0 3 7 9 0 4 10' R E A R S E T B A C K - P R I N C I P A L B U I L D I N G 5' R E A R S E T B A C K - P R I N C I P A L B U I L D I N G U S E D A S G A R A G E & AC C E S S O R Y B U I L D I N G 5' MINIMUM SIDE SETBACK10' F R O N T S E T B A C K PRI N C I P A L B U I L D I N G 15' F R O N T S E T B A C K ACC E S S O R Y B U I L D I N G N SCALE: 1/8" = 1'-0" 1 Architectural Site Plan A101 43 SHEET TITLE INTEGRATED DESIGN TEAM PROJECT NO: MODEL FILE: DRAWN BY: COPYRIGHT: SHEET 14 A102 Jeffrey H Woodruff 312_W_Hyman_04272022.pln Project No. 116 /Users/jeffreyw/Documents/Cloud Hill Design/312 W Hyman/312_W_Hyman_04272022.plnPowder Day Skiiing, LLC, David A Tarrab Mees Architectural Site Drainage Plan 312 W Hyman Ave 312 W Hyman Ave Lots P+Q, Block 46 Aspen CO 81611 USA/ Pitkin County UGB, City of Aspen 312 W Hyman Ave Aspen CO 81611 USA Account # R000145 Parcel ID # 273512464006 Landscape Architect Jennifer M. Dolecki-Smith, RLA Escape Garden Design, LLC Interior Design Travis Terry Travis Terry Design Contractor (At Final) Structural Engineer (As per contractor) Civil Grading and Drainage Boundaries Unlimited (Preliminary) COA- HPO Site Visit08/22/21 Jeffrey H. Woodruff AIA, LEED AP Cloud Hill Design, LLC Snowmass Snowmass CO 81654 USA COA- HPC Conceptual02/26/22 COA- HPC Conceptual04/27/22 A A B B C C D D E E 4 4 3 3 2 2 1 1 100' 100' 1 A301 2 A301 4 Z004 2 A210 1 A211 3 A211 4 A211 #DrgID #LayID potential tree removal (2) to NW trees protected (3) to NE Plaster covered CMU wall with two layers of 5/8" Type X Gypsum, 1 hour fire wall Garage and enclosure meet rear and side setbacks. Existing rail ties are not plumb. Avoid current hazard. UP bedroom #2 bathe #3 mechanical boot c u b b i e s trash & r e c y c l i n g e n c l o s u r e bathe #2 buried dry- well, storm water run-off onsite collection new perf- pipe surrounding single car garage disturbance, drains to dry well in the North-East of the lot provide tree protection zone (TPZ) for existing trees to the North East of the site closet boot c u b b i e s & be n c h bedroom #3 main entry heat pumps (2)electric meters (2)gas & radon egress egress egress entry/mud w/d garden storage 1 A300 2 A300 1 A200 2 A2002 Z003 N SCALE: 1/8" = 1'-0" 1 Site Plan Draft Drainage A102 44 SHEET TITLE INTEGRATED DESIGN TEAM PROJECT NO: MODEL FILE: DRAWN BY: COPYRIGHT: SHEET 15 A103 Jeffrey H Woodruff 312_W_Hyman_04272022.pln Project No. 116 /Users/jeffreyw/Documents/Cloud Hill Design/312 W Hyman/312_W_Hyman_04272022.plnPowder Day Skiiing, LLC, David A Tarrab Mees Main Level Proposed Plan 312 W Hyman Ave 312 W Hyman Ave Lots P+Q, Block 46 Aspen CO 81611 USA/ Pitkin County UGB, City of Aspen 312 W Hyman Ave Aspen CO 81611 USA Account # R000145 Parcel ID # 273512464006 Landscape Architect Jennifer M. Dolecki-Smith, RLA Escape Garden Design, LLC Interior Design Travis Terry Travis Terry Design Contractor (At Final) Structural Engineer (As per contractor) Civil Grading and Drainage Boundaries Unlimited (Preliminary) COA- HPO Site Visit08/22/21 Jeffrey H. Woodruff AIA, LEED AP Cloud Hill Design, LLC Snowmass Snowmass CO 81654 USA COA- HPC Conceptual02/26/22 COA- HPC Conceptual04/27/22 A B C D E 4 4 3 3 2 2 1 1 16'-4 5 / 8 "20'-4"8'-2 1 7 / 6 4 "43'-0 9/64"32'-7"23'-9 3/8"16'-2 21/32"1'-6 2 1 / 3 2 " 2'-4 7 / 8 "5'-0 1/8"11'-8 5 / 3 2 " 8'-2"10'-2"10'-0"4'-3"9'-0"11'-9"19'-3"100' 100' 1 A301 2 A301 4 Z004 2 A210 1 A211 3 A211 4 A211 potential tree removal (2) to NW trees protected (3) to NE Plaster covered CMU wall with two layers of 5/8" Type X Gypsum, 1 hour fire wall Garage and enclosure meet rear and side setbacks. Existing rail ties are not plumb. Avoid current hazard. Proposed fence at the 5' side setback and 5' rear setback, lined on the South with shrubs, see landscaping plan St Moritz R e t a i n i n g w a l l ( e x i s t i n g and under r e h a b i l i t a t i o n ) UP bedroom #2 bathe #3 mechanical boot c u b b i e s trash & r e c y c l i n g e n c l o s u r e bathe #2 closet boot c u b b i e s & be n c h bedroom #3 main entry heat pumps (2) electric meters (2) gas & radon egress egress egress entry/mud w/d garden storage Grav e l o f f alley 1 A300 2 A300 1 A200 2 A200 2 Z003 N SCALE: 1/4" = 1'-0" 1 First Floor A103 45 SHEET TITLE INTEGRATED DESIGN TEAM PROJECT NO: MODEL FILE: DRAWN BY: COPYRIGHT: SHEET 16 A104 Jeffrey H Woodruff 312_W_Hyman_04272022.pln Project No. 116 /Users/jeffreyw/Documents/Cloud Hill Design/312 W Hyman/312_W_Hyman_04272022.plnPowder Day Skiiing, LLC, David A Tarrab Mees Second Level Proposed Plan 312 W Hyman Ave 312 W Hyman Ave Lots P+Q, Block 46 Aspen CO 81611 USA/ Pitkin County UGB, City of Aspen 312 W Hyman Ave Aspen CO 81611 USA Account # R000145 Parcel ID # 273512464006 Landscape Architect Jennifer M. Dolecki-Smith, RLA Escape Garden Design, LLC Interior Design Travis Terry Travis Terry Design Contractor (At Final) Structural Engineer (As per contractor) Civil Grading and Drainage Boundaries Unlimited (Preliminary) COA- HPO Site Visit08/22/21 Jeffrey H. Woodruff AIA, LEED AP Cloud Hill Design, LLC Snowmass Snowmass CO 81654 USA COA- HPC Conceptual02/26/22 COA- HPC Conceptual04/27/22 A A B B C C D D E E 4 4 3 3 2 2 1 1 FDWRE F1 A301 2 A301 4 Z004 2 A210 9'-3" 9'-3" 1 A300 2 A300 1 A200 2 A200 2 Z003 kitchen bathe #1 living room down deck deck fireplace bedroom 1 closetegress down N SCALE: 1/4" = 1'-0" 1 Second Floor A104 46 SHEET TITLE INTEGRATED DESIGN TEAM PROJECT NO: MODEL FILE: DRAWN BY: COPYRIGHT: SHEET 17 A105 Jeffrey H Woodruff 312_W_Hyman_04272022.pln Project No. 116 /Users/jeffreyw/Documents/Cloud Hill Design/312 W Hyman/312_W_Hyman_04272022.plnPowder Day Skiiing, LLC, David A Tarrab Mees Roof Plan Proposed 312 W Hyman Ave 312 W Hyman Ave Lots P+Q, Block 46 Aspen CO 81611 USA/ Pitkin County UGB, City of Aspen 312 W Hyman Ave Aspen CO 81611 USA Account # R000145 Parcel ID # 273512464006 Landscape Architect Jennifer M. Dolecki-Smith, RLA Escape Garden Design, LLC Interior Design Travis Terry Travis Terry Design Contractor (At Final) Structural Engineer (As per contractor) Civil Grading and Drainage Boundaries Unlimited (Preliminary) COA- HPO Site Visit08/22/21 Jeffrey H. Woodruff AIA, LEED AP Cloud Hill Design, LLC Snowmass Snowmass CO 81654 USA COA- HPC Conceptual02/26/22 COA- HPC Conceptual04/27/22W 98N6'-0" 3'-6"Sill 1'-3 39/64"W 99N6'-0" 3'-6"Sill 1'-3 39/64"W 100N6'-0" 3'-6"Sill 1'-3 39/64"A B C D E 4 4 3 3 2 2 1 1 1' Overhang, typ. Protected entry Solar as per onsite Energy Requirements 4:12 4:12 3.5:12 3.5:12 3.5:12 3.5:12 N SCALE: 1/4" = 1'-0" 1 Roof Plan A105 Note: Today this is a cold roof with attic vents. The current attic vents and screens are in disrepair (upon viewing from the attic) We are proposing removing the dropped ceiling, removing the attic vents and exposing the rafters, adding insulation and updating the light and vent in a Chalet style. The only exterior change, will be converting the attic vents to the same size rough opening, but installing hopper fenestration for light and vent. U-Value for horizontal fenestration = .50 as per IECC 2021 47 SHEET TITLE INTEGRATED DESIGN TEAM PROJECT NO: MODEL FILE: DRAWN BY: COPYRIGHT: SHEET 18 A106 Jeffrey H Woodruff 312_W_Hyman_04272022.pln Project No. 116 /Users/jeffreyw/Documents/Cloud Hill Design/312 W Hyman/312_W_Hyman_04272022.plnPowder Day Skiiing, LLC, David A Tarrab Mees Main Level Existing Plan 312 W Hyman Ave 312 W Hyman Ave Lots P+Q, Block 46 Aspen CO 81611 USA/ Pitkin County UGB, City of Aspen 312 W Hyman Ave Aspen CO 81611 USA Account # R000145 Parcel ID # 273512464006 Landscape Architect Jennifer M. Dolecki-Smith, RLA Escape Garden Design, LLC Interior Design Travis Terry Travis Terry Design Contractor (At Final) Structural Engineer (As per contractor) Civil Grading and Drainage Boundaries Unlimited (Preliminary) COA- HPO Site Visit08/22/21 Jeffrey H. Woodruff AIA, LEED AP Cloud Hill Design, LLC Snowmass Snowmass CO 81654 USA COA- HPC Conceptual02/26/22 COA- HPC Conceptual04/27/22 41 sq ft A A B B C C D D E E 4 4 3 3 2 2 1 1 W/D W/D 6'-10" 3 Z003 2 Z004 3 Z004 2 A204 KITCHEN BATHROOM BEDROOM LIVING ROOM F.P. STORAGE BEDROOM CLOSET STORAGE GARAGE MECHANICAL STORAGE GARAGE UP N SCALE: 1/4" = 1'-0" 1 First Floor Existing A106 48 SHEET TITLE INTEGRATED DESIGN TEAM PROJECT NO: MODEL FILE: DRAWN BY: COPYRIGHT: SHEET 19 A107 Jeffrey H Woodruff 312_W_Hyman_04272022.pln Project No. 116 /Users/jeffreyw/Documents/Cloud Hill Design/312 W Hyman/312_W_Hyman_04272022.plnPowder Day Skiiing, LLC, David A Tarrab Mees Second Level Existing Plan 312 W Hyman Ave 312 W Hyman Ave Lots P+Q, Block 46 Aspen CO 81611 USA/ Pitkin County UGB, City of Aspen 312 W Hyman Ave Aspen CO 81611 USA Account # R000145 Parcel ID # 273512464006 Landscape Architect Jennifer M. Dolecki-Smith, RLA Escape Garden Design, LLC Interior Design Travis Terry Travis Terry Design Contractor (At Final) Structural Engineer (As per contractor) Civil Grading and Drainage Boundaries Unlimited (Preliminary) COA- HPO Site Visit08/22/21 Jeffrey H. Woodruff AIA, LEED AP Cloud Hill Design, LLC Snowmass Snowmass CO 81654 USA COA- HPC Conceptual02/26/22 COA- HPC Conceptual04/27/22 A A B B C C D D E E 4 4 3 3 2 2 1 1 3 Z003 2 Z004 3 Z004 2 A204 11'-5 1/16" KITCHEN BATH BEDROOM LIVING ROOM F.P. BEDROOM CLOSET DOWN DOWN N SCALE: 1/4" = 1'-0" 1 Second Floor Existing A107 49 SHEET TITLE INTEGRATED DESIGN TEAM PROJECT NO: MODEL FILE: DRAWN BY: COPYRIGHT: SHEET 20 A108 Jeffrey H Woodruff 312_W_Hyman_04272022.pln Project No. 116 /Users/jeffreyw/Documents/Cloud Hill Design/312 W Hyman/312_W_Hyman_04272022.plnPowder Day Skiiing, LLC, David A Tarrab Mees Roof Plan Existing 312 W Hyman Ave 312 W Hyman Ave Lots P+Q, Block 46 Aspen CO 81611 USA/ Pitkin County UGB, City of Aspen 312 W Hyman Ave Aspen CO 81611 USA Account # R000145 Parcel ID # 273512464006 Landscape Architect Jennifer M. Dolecki-Smith, RLA Escape Garden Design, LLC Interior Design Travis Terry Travis Terry Design Contractor (At Final) Structural Engineer (As per contractor) Civil Grading and Drainage Boundaries Unlimited (Preliminary) COA- HPO Site Visit08/22/21 Jeffrey H. Woodruff AIA, LEED AP Cloud Hill Design, LLC Snowmass Snowmass CO 81654 USA COA- HPC Conceptual02/26/22 COA- HPC Conceptual04/27/22 A A B B C C D D E E 4 4 3 3 2 2 1 1 3 Z003 2 Z004 3 Z004 2 A204 3.5:12 3.5:12 3.5:12 3.5:12 SCALE: 1/4" = 1'-0" 1 Roof Existing A108 50 SHEET TITLE INTEGRATED DESIGN TEAM PROJECT NO: MODEL FILE: DRAWN BY: COPYRIGHT: SHEET 21 A200 Jeffrey H Woodruff 312_W_Hyman_04272022.pln Project No. 116 /Users/jeffreyw/Documents/Cloud Hill Design/312 W Hyman/312_W_Hyman_04272022.plnPowder Day Skiiing, LLC, David A Tarrab Mees Elevations Proposed 312 W Hyman Ave 312 W Hyman Ave Lots P+Q, Block 46 Aspen CO 81611 USA/ Pitkin County UGB, City of Aspen 312 W Hyman Ave Aspen CO 81611 USA Account # R000145 Parcel ID # 273512464006 Landscape Architect Jennifer M. Dolecki-Smith, RLA Escape Garden Design, LLC Interior Design Travis Terry Travis Terry Design Contractor (At Final) Structural Engineer (As per contractor) Civil Grading and Drainage Boundaries Unlimited (Preliminary) COA- HPO Site Visit08/22/21 Jeffrey H. Woodruff AIA, LEED AP Cloud Hill Design, LLC Snowmass Snowmass CO 81654 USA COA- HPC Conceptual02/26/22 COA- HPC Conceptual04/27/22 ±0" 1 First Floor ±0" 1 First Floor +9'-3" 2 Second Floor +9'-3" 2 Second Floor +18'-3" 3 Roof +18'-3" 3 Roof New Wood Existing Wood New CMU Existing Wood Existing Synthetic Treads ±0" 1 First Floor +9'-3" 2 Second Floor +18'-3" 3 Roof Existing Wood Existing CMU New CMU New Wood Balcony Existing Standing Seam New Wood New WoodNew Stucco New Skylights New Masonry New CMU New Storage SCALE: 1/4" = 1'-0" 1 North Elevation A200 SCALE: 1/4" = 1'-0" 2 East Elevation A200 51 SHEET TITLE INTEGRATED DESIGN TEAM PROJECT NO: MODEL FILE: DRAWN BY: COPYRIGHT: SHEET 22 A201 Jeffrey H Woodruff 312_W_Hyman_04272022.pln Project No. 116 /Users/jeffreyw/Documents/Cloud Hill Design/312 W Hyman/312_W_Hyman_04272022.plnPowder Day Skiiing, LLC, David A Tarrab Mees Elevations Proposed 312 W Hyman Ave 312 W Hyman Ave Lots P+Q, Block 46 Aspen CO 81611 USA/ Pitkin County UGB, City of Aspen 312 W Hyman Ave Aspen CO 81611 USA Account # R000145 Parcel ID # 273512464006 Landscape Architect Jennifer M. Dolecki-Smith, RLA Escape Garden Design, LLC Interior Design Travis Terry Travis Terry Design Contractor (At Final) Structural Engineer (As per contractor) Civil Grading and Drainage Boundaries Unlimited (Preliminary) COA- HPO Site Visit08/22/21 Jeffrey H. Woodruff AIA, LEED AP Cloud Hill Design, LLC Snowmass Snowmass CO 81654 USA COA- HPC Conceptual02/26/22 COA- HPC Conceptual04/27/22 ±0" 1 First Floor ±0" 1 First Floor +9'-3" 2 Second Floor +9'-3" 2 Second Floor +18'-3" 3 Roof +18'-3" 3 Roof Existing CMU Existing Wood Eave Triangular Fenestration, As per revised guidance ±0" 1 First Floor +9'-3" 2 Second Floor +18'-3" 3 Roof 22'-1 5/16" 23'-10" 25'-0" 12'-0 15/32" Existing WoodNew Wood Existing Opening Existing Wood Existing CMU Existing CMU New Stucco New Standing Seam SCALE: 1/4" = 1'-0" 1 South Elevation A201 SCALE: 1/4" = 1'-0" 2 West Elevation A201 52 SHEET TITLE INTEGRATED DESIGN TEAM PROJECT NO: MODEL FILE: DRAWN BY: COPYRIGHT: SHEET 23 A203 Jeffrey H Woodruff 312_W_Hyman_04272022.pln Project No. 116 /Users/jeffreyw/Documents/Cloud Hill Design/312 W Hyman/312_W_Hyman_04272022.plnPowder Day Skiiing, LLC, David A Tarrab Mees Existing Elevations 312 W Hyman Ave 312 W Hyman Ave Lots P+Q, Block 46 Aspen CO 81611 USA/ Pitkin County UGB, City of Aspen 312 W Hyman Ave Aspen CO 81611 USA Account # R000145 Parcel ID # 273512464006 Landscape Architect Jennifer M. Dolecki-Smith, RLA Escape Garden Design, LLC Interior Design Travis Terry Travis Terry Design Contractor (At Final) Structural Engineer (As per contractor) Civil Grading and Drainage Boundaries Unlimited (Preliminary) COA- HPO Site Visit08/22/21 Jeffrey H. Woodruff AIA, LEED AP Cloud Hill Design, LLC Snowmass Snowmass CO 81654 USA COA- HPC Conceptual02/26/22 COA- HPC Conceptual04/27/22 ±0" 1 First Floor ±0" 1 First Floor +9'-3" 2 Second Floor +9'-3" 2 Second Floor +18'-3" 3 Roof +18'-3" 3 Roof ±0" 1 First Floor ±0" 1 First Floor +9'-3" 2 Second Floor +9'-3" 2 Second Floor +18'-3" 3 Roof +18'-3" 3 Roof SCALE: 1/4" = 1'-0" 1 Existing North Elevation A203 SCALE: 1/4" = 1'-0" 2 Existing East Elevation A203 SCALE: 1:0.33 3 312wHyman_WEB303 A203 SCALE: 1:0.33 4 312wHyman_WEB304 A203 53 SHEET TITLE INTEGRATED DESIGN TEAM PROJECT NO: MODEL FILE: DRAWN BY: COPYRIGHT: SHEET 24 A204 Jeffrey H Woodruff 312_W_Hyman_04272022.pln Project No. 116 /Users/jeffreyw/Documents/Cloud Hill Design/312 W Hyman/312_W_Hyman_04272022.plnPowder Day Skiiing, LLC, David A Tarrab Mees Existing Elevations 312 W Hyman Ave 312 W Hyman Ave Lots P+Q, Block 46 Aspen CO 81611 USA/ Pitkin County UGB, City of Aspen 312 W Hyman Ave Aspen CO 81611 USA Account # R000145 Parcel ID # 273512464006 Landscape Architect Jennifer M. Dolecki-Smith, RLA Escape Garden Design, LLC Interior Design Travis Terry Travis Terry Design Contractor (At Final) Structural Engineer (As per contractor) Civil Grading and Drainage Boundaries Unlimited (Preliminary) COA- HPO Site Visit08/22/21 Jeffrey H. Woodruff AIA, LEED AP Cloud Hill Design, LLC Snowmass Snowmass CO 81654 USA COA- HPC Conceptual02/26/22 COA- HPC Conceptual04/27/22 ±0" 1 First Floor ±0" 1 First Floor +9'-3" 2 Second Floor +9'-3" 2 Second Floor +18'-3" 3 Roof +18'-3" 3 Roof 18'-3 1 / 2 " 19'-7 1/16"19'-7 1/16"25'-0"Existing Grade (Most Restrictive) 1 2 3 4 ±0" 1 First Floor ±0" 1 First Floor +9'-3" 2 Second Floor +9'-3" 2 Second Floor +18'-3" 3 Roof +18'-3" 3 Roof SCALE: 1/4" = 1'-0" 1 Existing South Elevation A204 SCALE: 1/4" = 1'-0" 2 Existing West Elevation A204 SCALE: 1:0.27 3 312wHyman_WEB301 A204 SCALE: 1:0.26 4 312wHyman_WEB302 A204 54 SHEET TITLE INTEGRATED DESIGN TEAM PROJECT NO: MODEL FILE: DRAWN BY: COPYRIGHT: SHEET 25 A210 Jeffrey H Woodruff 312_W_Hyman_04272022.pln Project No. 116 /Users/jeffreyw/Documents/Cloud Hill Design/312 W Hyman/312_W_Hyman_04272022.plnPowder Day Skiiing, LLC, David A Tarrab Mees Fence Layout 312 W Hyman Ave 312 W Hyman Ave Lots P+Q, Block 46 Aspen CO 81611 USA/ Pitkin County UGB, City of Aspen 312 W Hyman Ave Aspen CO 81611 USA Account # R000145 Parcel ID # 273512464006 Landscape Architect Jennifer M. Dolecki-Smith, RLA Escape Garden Design, LLC Interior Design Travis Terry Travis Terry Design Contractor (At Final) Structural Engineer (As per contractor) Civil Grading and Drainage Boundaries Unlimited (Preliminary) COA- HPO Site Visit08/22/21 Jeffrey H. Woodruff AIA, LEED AP Cloud Hill Design, LLC Snowmass Snowmass CO 81654 USA COA- HPC Conceptual02/26/22 COA- HPC Conceptual04/27/22 1,210.5 sq ft A A B B C C D D E E 4 4 3 3 2 2 1 1 1.55 5 ' 2.40 6 '5.011'11.6 8 ' 8.167'10.167'10'4.25'9'11.749'19.25'5.00 1 '11.313'308 sq ft Proposed fence at the 5' side setback and 5' rear setback, lined on the South with shrubs, see landscaping plan St Moritz R e t a i n i n g w a l l ( e x i s t i n g and under r e h a b i l i t a t i o n ) Removal of T r e e # 2 Removal of T r e e # 1 E EG OS W7904790379027901 7901 7901 790179 0 2 7902 790379 0 3 7 9 0 4 10' R E A R S E T B A C K - P R I N C I P A L B U I L D I N G 5' R E A R S E T B A C K - P R I N C I P A L B U I L D I N G U S E D A S G A R A G E & AC C E S S O R Y B U I L D I N G 5' MINIMUM SIDE SETBACK10' F R O N T S E T B A C K PRI N C I P A L B U I L D I N G 15' F R O N T S E T B A C K ACC E S S O R Y B U I L D I N G ±0.000' 1 First Floor ±0.000' 1 First Floor +9.250' 2 Second Floor +9.250' 2 Second Floor +18.250' 3 Roof +18.250' 3 Roof 6'31.35' New 6" WoodNew Stucco N SCALE: 1/16" = 1'-0" 1 Architectural Site Plan A210 SCALE: 1/4" = 1'-0" 2 Garage South Elevation A210 55 SHEET TITLE INTEGRATED DESIGN TEAM PROJECT NO: MODEL FILE: DRAWN BY: COPYRIGHT: SHEET 26 A211 Jeffrey H Woodruff 312_W_Hyman_04272022.pln Project No. 116 /Users/jeffreyw/Documents/Cloud Hill Design/312 W Hyman/312_W_Hyman_04272022.plnPowder Day Skiiing, LLC, David A Tarrab Mees Garage Elevations 312 W Hyman Ave 312 W Hyman Ave Lots P+Q, Block 46 Aspen CO 81611 USA/ Pitkin County UGB, City of Aspen 312 W Hyman Ave Aspen CO 81611 USA Account # R000145 Parcel ID # 273512464006 Landscape Architect Jennifer M. Dolecki-Smith, RLA Escape Garden Design, LLC Interior Design Travis Terry Travis Terry Design Contractor (At Final) Structural Engineer (As per contractor) Civil Grading and Drainage Boundaries Unlimited (Preliminary) COA- HPO Site Visit08/22/21 Jeffrey H. Woodruff AIA, LEED AP Cloud Hill Design, LLC Snowmass Snowmass CO 81654 USA COA- HPC Conceptual02/26/22 COA- HPC Conceptual04/27/22 ±0" 1 First Floor +9'-3" 2 Second Floor +18'-3" 3 Roof ±0" 1 First Floor +9'-3" 2 Second Floor +18'-3" 3 Roof 6'-0"31'-4 13/64" New 6" WoodNew Stucco ±0" 1 First Floor ±0" 1 First Floor +9'-3" 2 Second Floor +9'-3" 2 Second Floor +18'-3" 3 Roof +18'-3" 3 Roof ±0" 1 First Floor +9'-3" 2 Second Floor +18'-3" 3 Roof SCALE: 1/4" = 1'-0" 1 Garage Elevation North A211 SCALE: 1/4" = 1'-0" 2 Garage South Elevation A211 SCALE: 1/4" = 1'-0" 3 East Elevation A211 SCALE: 1/4" = 1'-0" 4 West Elevation A211 56 SHEET TITLE INTEGRATED DESIGN TEAM PROJECT NO: MODEL FILE: DRAWN BY: COPYRIGHT: SHEET 27 A300 Jeffrey H Woodruff 312_W_Hyman_04272022.pln Project No. 116 /Users/jeffreyw/Documents/Cloud Hill Design/312 W Hyman/312_W_Hyman_04272022.plnPowder Day Skiiing, LLC, David A Tarrab Mees Transverse Sections 312 W Hyman Ave 312 W Hyman Ave Lots P+Q, Block 46 Aspen CO 81611 USA/ Pitkin County UGB, City of Aspen 312 W Hyman Ave Aspen CO 81611 USA Account # R000145 Parcel ID # 273512464006 Landscape Architect Jennifer M. Dolecki-Smith, RLA Escape Garden Design, LLC Interior Design Travis Terry Travis Terry Design Contractor (At Final) Structural Engineer (As per contractor) Civil Grading and Drainage Boundaries Unlimited (Preliminary) COA- HPO Site Visit08/22/21 Jeffrey H. Woodruff AIA, LEED AP Cloud Hill Design, LLC Snowmass Snowmass CO 81654 USA COA- HPC Conceptual02/26/22 COA- HPC Conceptual04/27/22 E D C B A ±0" 1 First Floor E D C B A ±0" 1 First Floor SCALE: 1/4" = 1'-0" 1 transverse at Stairs A300SCALE: 1/4" = 1'-0" 2 transverse at Bedroom #2 A300 57 SHEET TITLE INTEGRATED DESIGN TEAM PROJECT NO: MODEL FILE: DRAWN BY: COPYRIGHT: SHEET 28 A301 Jeffrey H Woodruff 312_W_Hyman_04272022.pln Project No. 116 /Users/jeffreyw/Documents/Cloud Hill Design/312 W Hyman/312_W_Hyman_04272022.plnPowder Day Skiiing, LLC, David A Tarrab Mees Longitudinal Sections 312 W Hyman Ave 312 W Hyman Ave Lots P+Q, Block 46 Aspen CO 81611 USA/ Pitkin County UGB, City of Aspen 312 W Hyman Ave Aspen CO 81611 USA Account # R000145 Parcel ID # 273512464006 Landscape Architect Jennifer M. Dolecki-Smith, RLA Escape Garden Design, LLC Interior Design Travis Terry Travis Terry Design Contractor (At Final) Structural Engineer (As per contractor) Civil Grading and Drainage Boundaries Unlimited (Preliminary) COA- HPO Site Visit08/22/21 Jeffrey H. Woodruff AIA, LEED AP Cloud Hill Design, LLC Snowmass Snowmass CO 81654 USA COA- HPC Conceptual02/26/22 COA- HPC Conceptual04/27/22 ±0" 1 First Floor +9'-3" 2 Second Floor +18'-3" 3 Roof 4 3 2 1 ±0" 1 First Floor +9'-3" 2 Second Floor +18'-3" 3 Roof 4'-4"garden storage bedroom # 2 casework SCALE: 1/4" = 1'-0" 1 Longitudinal at Stairs A301 SCALE: 1/4" = 1'-0" 2 longitudinal at Bedroom #2 and Garden Storage A301 58 SHEET TITLE INTEGRATED DESIGN TEAM PROJECT NO: MODEL FILE: DRAWN BY: COPYRIGHT: SHEET 29 A500 Jeffrey H Woodruff 312_W_Hyman_04272022.pln Project No. 116 /Users/jeffreyw/Documents/Cloud Hill Design/312 W Hyman/312_W_Hyman_04272022.plnPowder Day Skiiing, LLC, David A Tarrab Mees Schedules 312 W Hyman Ave 312 W Hyman Ave Lots P+Q, Block 46 Aspen CO 81611 USA/ Pitkin County UGB, City of Aspen 312 W Hyman Ave Aspen CO 81611 USA Account # R000145 Parcel ID # 273512464006 Landscape Architect Jennifer M. Dolecki-Smith, RLA Escape Garden Design, LLC Interior Design Travis Terry Travis Terry Design Contractor (At Final) Structural Engineer (As per contractor) Civil Grading and Drainage Boundaries Unlimited (Preliminary) COA- HPO Site Visit08/22/21 Jeffrey H. Woodruff AIA, LEED AP Cloud Hill Design, LLC Snowmass Snowmass CO 81654 USA COA- HPC Conceptual02/26/22 COA- HPC Conceptual04/27/22 WINDOW TYPE Fixed Fixed Fixed Fixed Fixed Fixed VIEW DIMENSIONS 1'-0"×1'-0"2'-0"×2'-6"2'-0"×3'-0"2'-0"×4'-0"2'-0"×4'-6"2'-1"×2'-8" NOTES WINDOW LEGEND WINDOW SCHEDULE WINDOW NUMBER ROOM ID W 0N W 0N W 1N W 2E W 3E W 4E W 5E W 6E W 6E W 7E W 7N W 7N W 7N W 8N W 9N W 11E W 12E W 13N W 14E W 15E W 16E W 17N W 18N W 19N ROOM NAME WIDOW SIZE NOMINAL WIDTH 3'-0" 3'-0" 2'-6" 3'-10" 2'-1" 3'-10" 3'-10" 3'-10" 2'-0" 2'-0" 2'-0" 2'-0" 2'-0" 6'-0" 2'-0" 7'-0" 7'-0" 2'-0" 7'-0" 6'-0" 6'-0" 3'-0" 4'-3" 4'-3" NOMINAL HEIGHT 4'-0" 4'-0" 5'-0" 2'-8" 2'-8" 2'-8" 2'-8" 2'-8" 4'-0" 4'-0" 4'-0" 4'-0" 4'-6" 2'-0" 4'-6" 4'-0" 5'-0" 3'-0" 5'-0" 3'-6" 3'-6" 4'-0" 4'-0" 4'-0" TYPE Fixed Fixed Fixed Fixed Fixed Fixed Fixed Fixed Fixed Fixed Fixed Fixed Fixed Fixed Fixed Fixed Fixed Fixed Fixed Fixed Fixed Fixed Fixed Fixed HEAD DETAIL JAMB DETAIL SILL DETAIL ACCESORIES STC U-VALUE .29/.36 .29/.36 .29/.36 Single Single Single Single Single Single .29/.36 .29/.36 .29/.36 .29/.36 .29/.36 .29/.36 Single Single .29/.36 Single Single Single .29/.36 .29/.36 .29/.36 TEMPERED REMARKS SCALE: 1' = 1'-0" 1 Window Legend A500 SCALE: 1' = 1'-0" 2 Window Schedule A500 59 SHEET TITLE INTEGRATED DESIGN TEAM PROJECT NO: MODEL FILE: DRAWN BY: COPYRIGHT: SHEET 30 A501 Jeffrey H Woodruff 312_W_Hyman_04272022.pln Project No. 116 /Users/jeffreyw/Documents/Cloud Hill Design/312 W Hyman/312_W_Hyman_04272022.plnPowder Day Skiiing, LLC, David A Tarrab Mees Schedules 312 W Hyman Ave 312 W Hyman Ave Lots P+Q, Block 46 Aspen CO 81611 USA/ Pitkin County UGB, City of Aspen 312 W Hyman Ave Aspen CO 81611 USA Account # R000145 Parcel ID # 273512464006 Landscape Architect Jennifer M. Dolecki-Smith, RLA Escape Garden Design, LLC Interior Design Travis Terry Travis Terry Design Contractor (At Final) Structural Engineer (As per contractor) Civil Grading and Drainage Boundaries Unlimited (Preliminary) COA- HPO Site Visit08/22/21 Jeffrey H. Woodruff AIA, LEED AP Cloud Hill Design, LLC Snowmass Snowmass CO 81654 USA COA- HPC Conceptual02/26/22 COA- HPC Conceptual04/27/22 TYPE Flush Flush Flush Flush Flush Flush Flush VIEW DIMENSIONS 1'-10"×8'-0"1'-8"×8'-0"2'-0"×8'-0"2'-10"×7'-0"2'-10"×8'-0"2'-2"×8'-0"2'-4"×8'-0" NOTES DOOR LEGEND DOOR SCHEDULE DOOR NUMBER ROOM ID D 0N D 1E D 1N D 1N D 1N D 1N D 2E D 2N D 3E D 3N D 3N D 3N D 4N D 4N D 4N D 5N D 6N D 6N D 7N D 8N D 9N D 9N D 10N D 18N D 18N D 18N D 18N D 19N D 20N D 22E D 23N D 24N D 25N ROOM NAME DOOR LEAF NOMINAL WIDTH 2'-4" 3'-0" 5'-0" 5'-0" 5'-0" 2'-2" 7'-9" 2'-6" 7'-9" 3'-0" 2'-6" 2'-6" 7'-9" 2'-2" 4'-0" 7'-9" 5'-10" 2'-4" 2'-0" 2'-6" 2'-6" 2'-6" 2'-10" 1'-10" 1'-8" 2'-10" 2'-0" 3'-0" 2'-6" 3'-0" 10'-0" 5'-0" 3'-0" NOMINAL HEIGHT 8'-0" 8'-0" 7'-0" 7'-6" 7'-6" 8'-0" 6'-5" 8'-0" 6'-5" 2'-9" 8'-0" 8'-0" 6'-5" 8'-0" 6'-8" 6'-5" 7'-6" 8'-0" 8'-0" 8'-0" 8'-0" 8'-0" 7'-0" 8'-0" 8'-0" 8'-0" 8'-0" 6'-8" 8'-0" 6'-6" 7'-0" 6'-3" 8'-0" LEAF THICKNESS 1 3/4" 1 3/4" 1 3/8" 1 3/8" 1 3/8" 1 3/4" 1 3/4" 1 3/4" 1 3/4" 1 3/4" 1 3/4" 1 3/4" 1 3/4" 1 3/4" 1 3/4" 1 3/4" 1 3/4" 1 3/4" 1 3/4" 1 3/4" 1 3/4" 1 3/4" 1 3/4" 1 3/4" 1 3/4" 1 3/4" 1 3/4" 1 3/4" 1 3/4" 1 3/4" 1 3/4" 1 3/4" 1 3/4" MATERIAL Undefined Undefined Undefined Undefined Undefined Undefined Undefined Undefined Undefined Undefined Undefined Undefined Undefined Undefined Undefined Undefined Undefined Undefined Undefined Undefined Undefined Undefined Undefined Undefined Undefined Undefined Undefined Undefined Undefined Undefined Undefined Undefined Undefined TYPE HEAD DETAIL JAMB DETAIL SILL DETAIL HARD WARE SET ACCESORIES RATINGS FIRE <Undefined> <Undefined> <Undefined> <Undefined> <Undefined> <Undefined> <Undefined> <Undefined> <Undefined> <Undefined> <Undefined> <Undefined> <Undefined> <Undefined> <Undefined> <Undefined> <Undefined> <Undefined> <Undefined> <Undefined> <Undefined> <Undefined> <Undefined> <Undefined> <Undefined> <Undefined> <Undefined> <Undefined> <Undefined> <Undefined> <Undefined> <Undefined> <Undefined> STC REMARKS Width, Matches Width of Exiting/Historic Fenestration/Doors on the South and East facades SCALE: 1' = 1'-0" 1 Door Legend A501 SCALE: 1:0.95 2 Door Schedule A501 60 SHEET TITLE INTEGRATED DESIGN TEAM PROJECT NO: MODEL FILE: DRAWN BY: COPYRIGHT: SHEET 31 A600 Jeffrey H Woodruff 312_W_Hyman_04272022.pln Project No. 116 /Users/jeffreyw/Documents/Cloud Hill Design/312 W Hyman/312_W_Hyman_04272022.plnPowder Day Skiiing, LLC, David A Tarrab Mees Assemblies 312 W Hyman Ave 312 W Hyman Ave Lots P+Q, Block 46 Aspen CO 81611 USA/ Pitkin County UGB, City of Aspen 312 W Hyman Ave Aspen CO 81611 USA Account # R000145 Parcel ID # 273512464006 Landscape Architect Jennifer M. Dolecki-Smith, RLA Escape Garden Design, LLC Interior Design Travis Terry Travis Terry Design Contractor (At Final) Structural Engineer (As per contractor) Civil Grading and Drainage Boundaries Unlimited (Preliminary) COA- HPO Site Visit08/22/21 Jeffrey H. Woodruff AIA, LEED AP Cloud Hill Design, LLC Snowmass Snowmass CO 81654 USA COA- HPC Conceptual02/26/22 COA- HPC Conceptual04/27/22 5/8" GWB 2X6 FRAMING R-21 BATT STRUCTURAL PLY AIR AND VAPOR BARRIER 1 1/2" RIGID INSUL. W/ 1 X FURRING R-5 AIR SPACE WOOD SIDING TOTAL R-VALUE = 26 W1 5/8" GWB 2X6 FRAMING R-21 BATT STRUCTURAL PLY AIR AND VAPOR BARRIER 1 1/2" RIGID INSUL. W/ 1 X FURRING R-5 AIR SPACE STUCCO TOTAL R-VALUE = 26 W2 ● STANDING SEAM MEMBRANE ROOF ● 1/2" DENSDECK ● 1 1/2" POLYISO RIGID INSUL R7.5 ● 3/4" SHEATHING ● WOOD RAFTERS RE: STRUCT ● SPRAY FOAM (7" @ 6.5R/in) R45.5 ● HAT CHANNELS ● WOOD T&G TOTAL R VALUE = R53 COA DEWPOINT CALCULATOR: R Value of Assembly = 55.32 Temp. of Condensing Surface = 68.9 (must be greater than 41 degrees) R1 5/8" GWB 2X6 FRAMING R-21 BATT STRUCTURAL PLY AIR AND VAPOR BARRIER 1 1/2" RIGID INSUL. W/ 1 X FURRING R-5 AIR SPACE STUCCO TOTAL R-VALUE = 26 W3 SLAB ON GRADE ● 2" RIGID INSULATION ● 15 MIL VAPOR RETARDER ● 4" GRAVEL ● UNDISTURBED OR COMPACTED SUBGRADE F1 ● STANDING SEAM METAL ROOF ● 1/2" DENSDECK ● 1 1/2" POLYISO RIGID INSUL R7.5 ● 3/4" SHEATHING ● WOOD RAFTERS RE: STRUCT ● SPRAY FOAM (7" @ 6.5R/in) R45.5 ● HAT CHANNELS ● GWB TOTAL R VALUE = R53 COA DEWPOINT CALCULATOR: R Value of Assembly = 55.32 Temp. of Condensing Surface = 68.9 (must be greater than 41 degrees) R2 ● CARPET AND PAD ● 3/4" PLYWOOD(UNDERLAYMENT GRADE) ● 1X2 SLEEPERS ● 2" RIGID INSULATION ● 15 MIL VAPOR RETARDER ● 4" GRAVEL ● UNDISTURBED OR COMPACTED SUBGRADE F2 5/8" GWB (or two layers Type X for Garage) CMU Block (filled) STRUCTURAL PLY AIR AND VAPOR BARRIER 1 1/2" RIGID INSUL. W/ 1 X FURRING R-5 AIR SPACE STUCCO TOTAL R-VALUE = 26 (tbc) W3 (W3 Garage, 1 Hour Firewall) SCALE: 1" = 1'-0" 1 Assemblies A600 61 SHEET TITLE INTEGRATED DESIGN TEAM PROJECT NO: MODEL FILE: DRAWN BY: COPYRIGHT: SHEET 32 A700 Jeffrey H Woodruff 312_W_Hyman_04272022.pln Project No. 116 /Users/jeffreyw/Documents/Cloud Hill Design/312 W Hyman/312_W_Hyman_04272022.plnPowder Day Skiiing, LLC, David A Tarrab Mees HP HPO Materials 312 W Hyman Ave 312 W Hyman Ave Lots P+Q, Block 46 Aspen CO 81611 USA/ Pitkin County UGB, City of Aspen 312 W Hyman Ave Aspen CO 81611 USA Account # R000145 Parcel ID # 273512464006 Landscape Architect Jennifer M. Dolecki-Smith, RLA Escape Garden Design, LLC Interior Design Travis Terry Travis Terry Design Contractor (At Final) Structural Engineer (As per contractor) Civil Grading and Drainage Boundaries Unlimited (Preliminary) COA- HPO Site Visit08/22/21 Jeffrey H. Woodruff AIA, LEED AP Cloud Hill Design, LLC Snowmass Snowmass CO 81654 USA COA- HPC Conceptual02/26/22 COA- HPC Conceptual04/27/22 Match Existing Green Exterior Cladding (Aluminum, Wood Interior) Existing Exterior Cladding @ Living Level Existing Exterior Cladding @ Eave Existing Exterior Cladding @ Garage Door Existing Exterior Stucco Over CMU @ Main Level Existing Exterior Banister @ Living Level Deck Existing Recycled Decking @ Living Level Deck Match Existing Maroon For Exterior Cladding Replace New Exterior Lighting with Dark Sky Compliant (Down only), Colour TBD Replace Single-Pane Resources with exterior assemblies meeting IECC 2021 or Greater Aluminum Clad, Wood Interior, Divided Light Fenestration Garage, Cedar Siding (Unique, non a historical copy), with exposed concrete at base for moisture protection, Four Candidates to the right Garage, Stucco At Enry (Unique, non a historical copy) DCC Modern Cylinder System Surface, Cord, Stem, Wall Mount Page 12 of 15 © 2022 DMF Lighting. All Rights Reserved. Specifications subject to change without notice. See website for U.S. and international patent information. DMF LIGHTING 1118 E. 223rd St. Carson, CA 90745 323.934.7779 dmflighting.com PHOTOMETRY C0 - C180 C90 - C270cd 1099 lm Values in candela Luminous Intensity Beam Angle: 26° Gamma C 0º 0º3366 5º2967 10º2203 15º1391 20º775 25º419 30º248 35º167 40º119 45º87 50º62 55º43 60º26 65º15 70º7 75º4 80º2 85º1 90º0 Distance from LED Foot Candles Diameter 3’374 1.4' 6’93 2.8' 9’42 4.2' 12’23 5.6' Zone Lumens Luminaire % 0-30 862 78 0-40 971 88 0-60 1078 98 0-90 1098 100 0-180 1099 100 Zonal Lumen Summary Illuminance Chart1600 2400 3200 0°15°30° 45° 60° 75° 90° DC4xxxxD10SPxxxxx30 DCC Fixed, 1000 lm, 3000K, Spot C0 - C180 C90 - C270cd 1132 lm Values in candela Luminous Intensity Beam Angle: 14° Gamma C 0º 0º9823 5º6600 10º2335 15º734 20º357 25º244 30º195 35º159 40º116 45º85 50º61 55º42 60º28 65º16 70º7 75º4 80º2 85º1 90º0 Distance from LED Foot Candles Diameter 3’1091 0.7' 6’273 1.5' 9’121 2.2' 12’68 2.9' Zone Lumens Luminaire % 0-30 906 80 0-40 1004 89 0-60 1110 98 0-90 1131 100 0-180 1132 100 Zonal Lumen Summary Illuminance Chart 4000 6000 8000 0°15°30° 45° 60° 75° 90° DC4xxxxD10NSxxxxx30 DCC Fixed, 1000 lm, 3000K, Narrow Spot Page 13 of 15 © 2022 DMF Lighting. All Rights Reserved. Specifications subject to change without notice. See website for U.S. and international patent information. DMF LIGHTING 1118 E. 223rd St. Carson, CA 90745 323.934.7779 dmflighting.com DCC LED Cylinder Surface, Cord, Stem, Wall Mount PHOTOMETRY C0 - C180 C90 - C270cd 1071 lm Values in candela Luminous Intensity Beam Angle: 55° Gamma C 0º 0º1100 5º1058 10º973 15º866 20º743 25º609 30º478 35º361 40º252 45º161 50º102 55º68 60º41 65º24 70º11 75º6 80º4 85º2 90º0 Zone Lumens Luminaire % 0-30 620 58 0-40 845 79 0-60 1037 97 0-90 1069 100 0-180 1071 100 Zonal Lumen Summary Illuminance Chart DC4xxxxD10WFxxxxx30 DCC Fixed, 1000 lm, 3000K, Wide Flood C0 - C180 C90 - C270cd 1083 lm Values in candela Luminous Intensity Beam Angle: 37° Gamma C 0º 0º1890 5º1792 10º1503 15º1161 20º849 25º589 30º391 35º256 40º162 45º107 50º74 55º51 60º30 65º18 70º8 75º5 80º3 85º1 90º0 Zone Lumens Luminaire % 0-30 760 70 0-40 925 85 0-60 1058 98 0-90 1081 100 0-180 1083 100 Zonal Lumen Summary Illuminance Chart DC4xxxxD10FLxxxxx30 DCC Fixed, 1000 lm, 3000K, Flood Distance from LED Foot Candles Diameter 3’210 2.0' 6’52 4.0' 9’23 6.0' 12’13 8.0' 800 1200 1600 2000 0°15°30° 45° 60° 75° 90° 400 600 800 1000 1200 0°15°30° 45° 60° 75° 90° Distance from LED Foot Candles Diameter 3’122 3.1' 6’31 6.2' 9’14 9.3' 12’8 12.3' COA HP HPO Materials WORKSHEET A700 SCALE: 1' = 1'-0" 2 39.DMF_Downlight A700 SCALE: 1' = 1'-0" 3 39.DMFLighting_DCC_SpecSheet A700SCALE: 1' = 1'-0" 4 39.DMFLighting_DCC_SpecSheet A700 The DMF cylinder in Black or Brown (against the wood, or white against the stucco) would be flush mounted using the existing penetrations, maintaining the existing wall penetrations in the CMU and Stucco. The flood would work well on the Patio Walls, whereas the SouthEast Corner would benefit from a spot (reducing/eliminating) light loss near the property line. Light at the property line < .5 Foot Candles as per code. The existing lighting is a mix of jelly jars and exposed lamps. 62 SHEET TITLE INTEGRATED DESIGN TEAM PROJECT NO: MODEL FILE: DRAWN BY: COPYRIGHT: SHEET 33 A900 Jeffrey H Woodruff 312_W_Hyman_04272022.pln Project No. 116 /Users/jeffreyw/Documents/Cloud Hill Design/312 W Hyman/312_W_Hyman_04272022.plnPowder Day Skiiing, LLC, David A Tarrab Mees Precedent Studies 312 W Hyman Ave 312 W Hyman Ave Lots P+Q, Block 46 Aspen CO 81611 USA/ Pitkin County UGB, City of Aspen 312 W Hyman Ave Aspen CO 81611 USA Account # R000145 Parcel ID # 273512464006 Landscape Architect Jennifer M. Dolecki-Smith, RLA Escape Garden Design, LLC Interior Design Travis Terry Travis Terry Design Contractor (At Final) Structural Engineer (As per contractor) Civil Grading and Drainage Boundaries Unlimited (Preliminary) COA- HPO Site Visit08/22/21 Jeffrey H. Woodruff AIA, LEED AP Cloud Hill Design, LLC Snowmass Snowmass CO 81654 USA COA- HPC Conceptual02/26/22 COA- HPC Conceptual04/27/22 Schubertiade GmbH Austria A900 St Moritz (Bays) A900 Tyrolean_House_Hotel Post A900 Decks and Bays A900 SCALE: 1' = 1'-0" 5 Chalet Precendent A900 SCALE: 1' = 1'-0" 6 No longer a cold roof A900 63 SHEET TITLE INTEGRATED DESIGN TEAM PROJECT NO: MODEL FILE: DRAWN BY: COPYRIGHT: SHEET 34 A901 Jeffrey H Woodruff 312_W_Hyman_04272022.pln Project No. 116 /Users/jeffreyw/Documents/Cloud Hill Design/312 W Hyman/312_W_Hyman_04272022.plnPowder Day Skiiing, LLC, David A Tarrab Mees Restudy Required HPC 1.0 312 W Hyman Ave 312 W Hyman Ave Lots P+Q, Block 46 Aspen CO 81611 USA/ Pitkin County UGB, City of Aspen 312 W Hyman Ave Aspen CO 81611 USA Account # R000145 Parcel ID # 273512464006 Landscape Architect Jennifer M. Dolecki-Smith, RLA Escape Garden Design, LLC Interior Design Travis Terry Travis Terry Design Contractor (At Final) Structural Engineer (As per contractor) Civil Grading and Drainage Boundaries Unlimited (Preliminary) COA- HPO Site Visit08/22/21 Jeffrey H. Woodruff AIA, LEED AP Cloud Hill Design, LLC Snowmass Snowmass CO 81654 USA COA- HPC Conceptual02/26/22 COA- HPC Conceptual04/27/22 SCALE: 1' = 1'-0" 1 312_W_Hyman_08032021 - Picture1 A901 SCALE: 1' = 1'-0" 2 312_W_Hyman_08032021 - Picture3 A901 SCALE: 1' = 1'-0" 3 312_W_Hyman_08032021 - Picture2 A901 SCALE: 1' = 1'-0" 4 312_W_Hyman_08032021 - Picture4 A901 64 SHEET TITLE INTEGRATED DESIGN TEAM PROJECT NO: MODEL FILE: DRAWN BY: COPYRIGHT: SHEET 35 A903 Jeffrey H Woodruff 312_W_Hyman_04272022.pln Project No. 116 /Users/jeffreyw/Documents/Cloud Hill Design/312 W Hyman/312_W_Hyman_04272022.plnPowder Day Skiiing, LLC, David A Tarrab Mees Relationship to Neighborhood 312 W Hyman Ave 312 W Hyman Ave Lots P+Q, Block 46 Aspen CO 81611 USA/ Pitkin County UGB, City of Aspen 312 W Hyman Ave Aspen CO 81611 USA Account # R000145 Parcel ID # 273512464006 Landscape Architect Jennifer M. Dolecki-Smith, RLA Escape Garden Design, LLC Interior Design Travis Terry Travis Terry Design Contractor (At Final) Structural Engineer (As per contractor) Civil Grading and Drainage Boundaries Unlimited (Preliminary) COA- HPO Site Visit08/22/21 Jeffrey H. Woodruff AIA, LEED AP Cloud Hill Design, LLC Snowmass Snowmass CO 81654 USA COA- HPC Conceptual02/26/22 COA- HPC Conceptual04/27/22 SCALE: 1:0.57 1 Birds Eye view of 312 W Hyman A903 65 You have taken the first step to improving the comfort, safety, and efficiency of your home. The following report details the findings from the Home Energy Assessment on February 25, 2022. Call your local Energy Smart Colorado Resource Center with any questions or to discover available rebates that can help make these recommendations a reality. Your utility provider(s): Home Energy Assessment Your Energy Smart Analyst: Charles Cady (970) 379-2961 Woodruff Residence 312 West Hyman, Aspen, CO 81611 Pitkin jeffrey@cloudhilldesign.com (970) 452-9008 Building type: Single Family Year built: 1956 Square footage: 1,536 Primary heating fuel: Natural Gas Number of bedrooms: 3 Number of occupants: 2 Welcome to Energy Smart! Chalet style home in Aspens west end. The owner is planning a renovation with efficiency upgrades in mind. Currently in the planning stage. The assessment was completed as a beginning baseline. Air sealing would be a huge improvement. Assessment overview: 66 Energy Usage Your Energy Smart Analyst: Charles Cady (970) 379-2961 Electric utility provider: City of Aspen Electric Electric account #: 012503656000 Electricity cost per kWh: $0.11 Annual electric usage: 0 kWh Annual electric cost: $0 Gas utility provider: Black Hills Energy Gas account #: 3604100130 Gas cost per Therm: $0.85 Annual gas usage: 0 Therms Annual gas cost: $0 Woodruff Residence 312 West Hyman, Aspen, CO 81611 Pitkin jeffrey@cloudhilldesign.com (970) 452-9008 2 67 Recommended Upgrades Your Energy Smart Analyst: Charles Cady (970) 379-2961 When your Analyst performed your Home Energy Assessment, information was collected to estimate annual energy savings on projects you might consider completing to save money on your energy bills. Below is a breakdown of those suggested improvements, the estimated costs and potential annual savings, which were calculated through software modeling. A Savings to Investment Ratio (SIR) of 1 or greater means that the resulting energy savings will pay for the cost of the project. Energy Detail (estimated)Existing Home Improved Home Units Annual energy consumption MMBTU Annual electrical consumption kWh Annual gas consumption THERMS Potential PV system size to offset annual electric usage (estimated)KW Recommended Improvement Estimated Cost Estimated Annual Savings SIR Increase wall insulation to save energy and increase comfort.$0 $84 Replace incandescent lights with CFLs or LEDs to save energy and replacement costs.$5 $5 6.4 Increase attic insulation and coverage to save energy and increase comfort.$1,206 $59 1.0 Insulate your slab to save energy and increase comfort.$2,895 $51 0.4 Add storm windows or install new windows to save energy and increase comfort.$5,571 $89 0.3 114.3 4,001 1,007 2.9 77.3 3,928 639 2.8 3 68 Cubic volume: 11,520CF Blower door flow rate: 2,972CFM50 0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1 1.2 Your Home Average Home Tight Home Leaky Home Natural Air Changes per Hour (ACHn) Air Leakage Energy Smart Tip: Your analyst used a blower door fan to test for air leakage. This test helps determine how leaky or tight the home is relative to other homes. Your home’s natural leakage rate is shown in the chart on the left. A very leaky home costs more to heat, while a very tight home may require continuous mechanical ventilation. Leaks can be repaired through attic floor sealing, caulking, weather stripping, and other means. Your Energy Smart Analyst: Charles Cady (970) 379-2961 CF = Cubic Feet. The volume of air contained in a 1’ x 1’ x 1’ cube. CFM50 = Cubic Feet per Minute at 50 Pascals negative pressure. This number estimates how much air your home loses each hour. ACHn = Natural Air Changes per Hour. Expressed in the chart above as 1.05, this means that about 105.00 % of the air in your home is lost to the outside every hour. Infiltration at the upper level door.Infiltration at the sill plate .Blower door set up for the pressure test. Recommendations: Air infiltration observed at exterior doors, attic access, windows and trim, switches, outlets and sill plates. Exterior doors need new weatherstripping to replace the old. The attic access should be weatherstripped to keep out unwanted attic air. Windows and trim should be caulked to seal. Window replacement would be optimum. Switches and outlets can be sealed with gaskets and caulk to reduce infiltration. Sills and baseboards need to be caulked also. Woodruff Residence 312 West Hyman, Aspen, CO 81611 Pitkin jeffrey@cloudhilldesign.com (970) 452-9008 4 69 Existing window type: 1-pane, wood/vinyl frame Recommended window type: 2-pane, al. clad/wood, Low-e Square footage (sf) of windows: Front: 60sf Right: 49sf Back: 53sf Left: 24sf Envelope – Windows & Doors Energy Smart Tip: Adding storm windows, insulating blinds or replacing your current windows can save energy and make your home feel more comfortable. When replacing windows, install energy efficient units with a U-factor of .28 or lower and ensure that the rough opening of the window is properly air-sealed with a low-expanding foam that is approved for doors and windows. U-factor – This number refers to the ability of your windows to resist heat loss. It is the numerical reciprocal of R-value. Low-e – These coatings are applied to glass when windows are manufactured and help to reduce the window’s emissivity, which can improve insulating properties when properly applied. Gas filled – Noble gasses are used as an air barrier between panes of glass to help increase a window’s thermal performance. The seals that keep these gasses trapped inside can fail over time and should be inspected periodically. Your Energy Smart Analyst: Charles Cady (970) 379-2961 Single pane window with signs of deterioration . Double pane replacement doors with broken seals. Large expanses of single pane glass . Recommendations: Single pane windows are quite inefficient. Currently the windows have insulating shades and most have plastic window kits. Replacement would be optimum. Woodruff Residence 312 West Hyman, Aspen, CO 81611 Pitkin jeffrey@cloudhilldesign.com (970) 452-9008 5 70 Heating & Cooling Energy Smart Tip: Your home’s heating and cooling systems were inspected for safety and efficiency. Older heating systems should be replaced with energy efficient, sealed-combustion units or highly energy efficient heat pumps. This is often a significant upgrade so considerations beyond energy savings should be made. ENERGY STAR certified equipment will provide the best efficiency and savings. AFUE – Annual Fuel Utilization Efficiency is the measure of your heating system’s efficiency. Higher numbers are more energy efficient. SEER – Seasonal Energy Efficiency Ratio is the measure of your cooling system’s efficiency. Higher numbers are more energy efficient. Sealed combustion gas boiler Uninsulated heat pipes Recommendations: All exposed heat pipes should be insulated to reduce heat loss. Your Energy Smart Analyst: Charles Cady (970) 379-2961 Heating system type: Boiler-Baseboard Fuel: Natural Gas Efficiency rating (AFUE): 92 Recommended AFUE: Secondary heating system: Cooling system type: None Efficiency rating (SEER): Recommended SEER: Fireplace type: Wood Woodruff Residence 312 West Hyman, Aspen, CO 81611 Pitkin jeffrey@cloudhilldesign.com (970) 452-9008 6 71 Hot water system type: Indirect Fuel: Natural Gas Set temperature: 120 Solar thermal assist: N/A Pipes insulated?: No Existing EF: Recommended EF: Water Heating Energy Smart Tip: Many water heating systems are set to temperatures that are too high for safety and energy efficiency. Keep your water temperature at 120˚F for optimum energy performance and to keep your family safe. EF – Energy Factor is a metric used to compare the energy conversion efficiency of residential appliances and equipment. EF ratings vary by appliance size and type, but in general, bigger numbers are more energy efficient. Sidearm DHW tank with uninsulated pipes . Recommendations: All exposed hot water pipes should be insulated to reduce heat loss. Your Energy Smart Analyst: Charles Cady (970) 379-2961 Woodruff Residence 312 West Hyman, Aspen, CO 81611 Pitkin jeffrey@cloudhilldesign.com (970) 452-9008 7 72 Total # of lamps (bulbs): 32 Incandescent or halogen lamps: 1 LED or CFL lamps: 25 Florescent tubes: 6 Refrigerator ENERGY STAR: No kWh usage per year: 583 Second fridge ENERGY STAR: No kWh usage per year: Freezer ENERGY STAR: No kWh usage per year: Dishwasher ENERGY STAR:No Clothes washer ENERGY STAR: Yes Lighting & Appliances Energy Smart Tip: Replace incandescent and CFL lamps with LEDs. LEDs use about 20% of the energy and last up to 25 times longer than traditional incandescent bulbs. They also contain no toxic mercury and turn on instantly. Your refrigerator is usually one of the biggest consumers of electricity in your home. If your fridge is more than 10 years old, consider replacing it with an ENERGY STAR certified unit. Tips to reduce kWh base-load: 1)Use smart power strips for big energy users like home entertainment systems 2)Use laptop computers instead of big towers – they use up to 90% less power 3)Upgrade all of your appliances as they age to ENERGY STAR Your Energy Smart Analyst: Charles Cady (970) 379-2961 Seldom used wood fireplace .Infiltration at a wall outlet.See photo at left. Recommendations: When purchasing appliances choose ENERGY STAR models to reduce energy and water consumption. See air sealing recommendations Woodruff Residence 312 West Hyman, Aspen, CO 81611 Pitkin jeffrey@cloudhilldesign.com (970) 452-9008 8 73 Costs, Loans and Rebates The Colorado Residential Energy Upgrade Loan (RENU) loan program is a statewide residential loan program sponsored by the Colorado Energy Office in partnership with Elevations Credit Union. It makes home energy upgrades easy and affordable by offering low-cost, long-term financing for energy efficiency and renewable energy improvements. Direct Installs Your gas utility provider is Black Hills Energy Your electric utility provider is City of Aspen Electric 1. 2. 3.Energy Smart Colorado may also have local rebates available for your community. Click here for more info Your assessment invoice Assessment costs:Partner contributions:Your costs: Base cost $400.00 Electric utility copay $0.00 Your base cost $100.00 Additional costs $0.00 Gas utility copay Additional costs $0.00 Quick Fix total $0.00 Energy Smart incentive $300.00 Additional Quick Fixes $0.00 Program discount $0.00 Assessment total $400.00 Analyst payment $300.00 Your total $100.00 Quick Fix installed Quantity Cost Bath aerators:0 $0.00 DHW blankets:0 $0.00 Kitchen aerators:0 $0.00 LED bulbs:0 $0.00 Pipe wrap:0 $0.00 Showerheads:0 $0.00 Thermostats:0 $0.00 Weatherstripping:0 $0.00 Thermostat setback:0 $0.00 DHW setback:0 $0.00 TOTAL $0.00 QF Annual Savings $$0.00 QF Annual Savings kWh 0 QF Annual Savings Therm 0 The following energy-saving items were installed during the assessment: Click for electric rebatesHyperlink:RESIDENTIAL_ASSESSMENT_ELECTRIC_REBATE_URL:Click for electric rebates}} Click here for gas rebatesHyperlink:RESIDENTIAL_ASSESSMENT_GAS_REBATE_URL:Click here for gas rebates}} Woodruff Residence 312 West Hyman, Aspen, CO 81611 Pitkin jeffrey@cloudhilldesign.com (970) 452-9008 9 74 Energy Advising Have Questions? Energy Advisors at your local Energy Smart Colorado Energy Resource Center (ERC) can provide unbiased advice on the next steps toward making your home more comfortable and less costly to operate. They can help you with applicable rebates, incentives, contractors and best practices so you know you’re making educated decisions that are right for your home. Our Energy Advisors are expert consultants who can: •Provide expert advice about energy upgrades •Help you prioritize next steps for your home energy improvements •Connect you with qualified contractors •Assist you with applicable rebates and financing, and help you with the paperwork •Connect you with your utility provider’s incentive programs Heating our homes accounts for the biggest portion of utility bills in our cold climate. Source: U.S. Energy Information Administration, 2015 Residential Energy Consumption Survey. You may receive a call from an Energy Advisor offering to review this assessment with you. We look forward to working with you! Call to speak with an Energy Smart Colorado Energy Advisor: (970) 925-9775 (This is a free service!) How do our homes use energy? We’re here to help! Woodruff Residence 312 West Hyman, Aspen, CO 81611 Pitkin jeffrey@cloudhilldesign.com (970) 452-9008 10 75 Your Home Summary Your Energy Smart Analyst: Charles Cady (970) 379-2961 Metric Value Metric Value Metric Value Building Type:Single Family Primary Roof:Unconditioned Attic Combustion Zone Location:Conditioned Space Year Built:1956 Construction:Wood Frame Ambient CO: Square Footage:1,536 Exterior Finish:Composition Shingles Primary Heating Appliance Primary Heating Fuel:Natural Gas Percentage of Total:100%Worst Case Spillage: Number of Bedrooms:3 Existing R-Value:11 Worst Case Flue CO Air Free: Number of Occupants:2 Recommended R-Value:49 Natural Conditions Spillage: Electric Utility Provider:City of Aspen Electric Secondary Roof:Natural Conditions Flue CO Air Free: Account #:012503656000 Construction:Hot Water Heating Appliance Electricity Cost per kWh:$0.11 Exterior Finish:Worst Case Spillage: Annual Electric Usage (kWh):0 Percentage of Total:%Worst Case Flue CO Air Free: Annual Electric Cost:$0 Existing R-Value:Natural Conditions Spillage: Gas Utility Provider:Black Hills Energy Recommended R-Value:Natural Conditions Flue CO Air Free: Account #:3604100130 Existing Window Type:1-pane, wood/vinyl frame Secondary Heating Appliance Gas Cost per Therm:$0.85 Recommended Window Type:2-pane, al. clad/wood, Low-e Worst Case Spillage: Annual Gas Usage (Therms):0 Front Window (sf):60 Worst Case Flue CO Air Free: Annual Gas Cost:$0 Right Window (sf):49 Natural Conditions Spillage: Cubic Volume (cf):11,520 Back Window (sf):53 Natural Conditions Flue CO Air Free: Blower Door Flow Rate (CFM50):2,972 Left Window (sf):24 Total # of Lamps:32 Primary Foundation:Slab on Grade Heating System Type:Boiler-Baseboard Incandescent/Halogen Lamps:1 Percentage of Total:100%Heating System Year Installed:2012 LED or CFLs currently installed:25 Existing R-Value:0 Heating System Fuel:Natural Gas Florescent Tubes:6 Recommended R-Value:21 Efficiency Rating (AFUE):92 Refrigerator ENERGY STAR:No Secondary Foundation:Conditioned Basement Recommended AFUE (or equiv.):Refrigerator kWh Usage per Year (est.):583 Percentage of Total:%Secondary Heating System:Second Fridge ENERGY STAR:No Existing R-Value:11 Cooling System Type:None Second Fridge kWh Usage per Year: Recommended R-Value:21 Efficiency Rating (SEER):Freezer ENERGY STAR:No Primary Wall Construction:Concrete Block Recommended SEER:Freezer kWh Usage per Year (est.): Exterior Finish:Stucco Finish Fireplace Type:Wood Dishwasher ENERGY STAR:No Existing R-Value:3 Hot Water System:Indirect Clothes Washer ENERGY STAR:Yes Recommended R-Value:21 Hot Water System Year Installed:2012 Clothes Dryer ENERGY STAR: Recommended Continuous R-Value:5 Hot Water System Fuel:Natural Gas Clothes Dryer Fuel Source: Secondary Wall Construction:Wood Frame Set Temperature:120 Heat Tape Length (ft): Exterior Finish:Wood Siding Solar Thermal Assist:N/A Heat Tape Estimated kWh per month:0 Existing R-Value:11 Pipes Insulated?:No Hot Tub Capacity: Recommended R-Value:21 Efficiency Rating:Hot Tub Estimated kWh per month:0 Recommended Continuous R-Value:5 Recommended Efficiency:If Electric Baseboard, Length (ft): 76 SHEET TITLE INTEGRATED DESIGN TEAM PROJECT NO: MODEL FILE: DRAWN BY: COPYRIGHT: SHEET 34 Z007 Jeffrey H Woodruff 312_W_Hyman_04082022.pln Project No. 116 /Users/jeffreyw/Documents/Cloud Hill Design/312 W Hyman/312_W_Hyman_04082022.plnPowder Day Skiiing, LLC, David A Tarrab Mees Forestry 312 W Hyman Ave 312 W Hyman Ave Lots P+Q, Block 46 Aspen CO 81611 USA/ Pitkin County UGB, City of Aspen 312 W Hyman Ave Aspen CO 81611 USA Account # R000145 Parcel ID # 273512464006 Landscape Architect (At Final) Contractor Structural Engineer As per contractor Civil Grading and Drainage Boundaries Unlimited (At Final) COA- HPO Site Visit08/22/21 Cloud Hill Design, LLC Snowmass Snowmass CO 81654 USA COA- HPC Conceptual02/26/22 COA- HPC Approval03/23/22 28.5 sq ft 1,196 sq ft12.27'2.62'1.349'307.5 sq ft 32.25 sq ft E EG OS W1 2 3 4 5 678 9 10 1112131415 16790479037902 7901 7901 7901 790179 0 2 7902 790379 0 3 7 9 0 4 Grav e l o f f alley A A B B C C D D E E 4 4 3 3 2 2 1 1 1.55 5 ' 2.40 6 ' 5.00'5'11.6 8 ' 8.167'10.167'10'4.25'9'11.749'19.25'12.27'4.095'307.5 sq ft 32.25 sq ft Proposed fence at the 5' side setback and 5' rear setback, lined on the South with shrubs, see landscaping plan St Moritz R e t a i n i n g w a l l ( e x i s t i n g and under r e h a b i l i t a t i o n ) E EG OS W1 2 3 4 5 678 9 10 1112131415 16790479037902 7901 7901 7901 790179 0 2 7902 790379 0 3 7 9 0 4 Grav e l o f f alley 301.25 sq ft 32 sq ft E EG OS W1 2 3 4 5 678 9 10 1112131415 16790479037902 7901 7901 7901 790179 0 2 7902 790379 0 3 7 9 0 4 Grav e l o f f alley SCALE: 1/16" = 1'-0" 1 First Floor Forestry NW Z007 SCALE: 1/16" = 1'-0" 2 First Floor Forestry NE Z007SCALE: 1/16" = 1'-0" 3 First Floor Forestry Angled Z007 North West Garage/Trash Enclosure Strengths: Aligned with existing site disturbance, the railroad tie retaining wall Leaves the largest open space in the backyard No/little impact to trees #3, #4 and #5 and no impact to Aspens along East property line Does not interfere with existing utilities (maybe gas, but not electric) Benefits to house across alley (north), views to Shadow Mountain Minor negative to St Moritz, but ridge line is 12'-6" and grade steps down 3' grade (from the property line to the NE corner of the garage) and 6' retaining wall, so impact is negligible to St Moritz Distance between the Garage and the Residence is 11', goes to 12' with the 2.5' side setback Keep all trees, gravel between the alley and the garage Distance between the property line and Tree #1 is 15', if the neighboring retaining wall is plum and does not encroach on the West property line. Weaknesses: Minimal impacts to Trees #1 and #2, development, both permeable and hardscape in the Tree #1 drip-line 13' from retaining wall to tree #1 (layout assumes less than 5' setback or additional/variance to combined side setback in R6. If the retaining wall was plum this measurement would be 15' Impact to existing utilities, gas, which runs to the West and South of tree #1 Difficult entry, entry from the East due to grade changes at the alley Drainage Angled Garage/Trash Enclosure Strengths: Protects Tree #1, impact to Tree #2 and likely Tree #3 No/little impact to trees #4 and #5 and no impact to Aspens along East property line Benefits to house across alley (north), views to Shadow Mountain Minor negative to St Moritz, but ridge line is 12'-6" and steps down 3' grade and 6' retaining wall, so impact is extremely negligible to St Moritz Weaknesses: Does not meet residential design standards, not 90 degrees to the alley Reduces usable backyard space, creates unused triangles on the lot Interferes with existing utilities (maybe gas and electric) Distance between the South West Corner of the Garage and the North East corner of the building is less than 5' We create a dead space, unused on the lot of 102 Sq Ft (the North East triangle, goes un-used), so ~2% of the lot space is a void/unusable square footage it creates other impacts- The triangulation of the rectangle- negatively impacts utilities, decreases distance to residence (so it appears like a larger, continuous building on the lot) and fragments the outdoor / back yard continuity (continuous space is interrupted and the yard appears smaller and less occupiable/usable) North East Garage/Trash Enclosure Strengths: Protects Tree #1 and Tree #2 No impact to St Moritz, ridge line is 12'-6" and steps down 3'+ grade and 6' retaining wall, so impact is extremely negligible to St Moritz Weaknesses: Impact to tree #3, tree #4 and #5 and impact to Aspens along East property line Reduces usable backyard space, with garage enjoying a wonderful view to Shadow Mountain Interferes with existing utilities (catv, telephone and electric; impacts to the neighbors to the North and East, concrete pad is for at least four residences/multi-family+) Distance between garage and main residence is 4'-0", does not meet residential design standards for R-6 Zoning 77 SHEET TITLE INTEGRATED DESIGN TEAM PROJECT NO: MODEL FILE: DRAWN BY: COPYRIGHT: SHEET 35 Z008 Jeffrey H Woodruff 312_W_Hyman_04082022.pln Project No. 116 /Users/jeffreyw/Documents/Cloud Hill Design/312 W Hyman/312_W_Hyman_04082022.plnPowder Day Skiiing, LLC, David A Tarrab Mees Forestry Site Coverage 312 W Hyman Ave 312 W Hyman Ave Lots P+Q, Block 46 Aspen CO 81611 USA/ Pitkin County UGB, City of Aspen 312 W Hyman Ave Aspen CO 81611 USA Account # R000145 Parcel ID # 273512464006 Landscape Architect (At Final) Contractor Structural Engineer As per contractor Civil Grading and Drainage Boundaries Unlimited (At Final) COA- HPO Site Visit08/22/21 Cloud Hill Design, LLC Snowmass Snowmass CO 81654 USA COA- HPC Conceptual02/26/22 COA- HPC Approval03/23/22 488.75 sq ft 392.75 sq ft 760.25 sq ft 680.25 sq ft 271.75 sq ft 464.75 sq ft 1,046.5 sq ft 1 2 3 4 5 678 9 10 1112131415 16 Grav e l o f f alley SCALE: 1/8" = 1'-0" 1 First Floor- Tree Z008 Site Total 5,976+- SF Tree Protection Zone/Pervious Space North/East Trees 680.25 Sf East Tree 271.75 SF South State Tree 760.25 SF West Tree 464.75 SF Tree Site Coverage 2,177.00 SF Tree Site % 36.43% Impervious Site Coverage Chalet 1210.75 SF Garage 307.5 SF Enclosure 32.25 SF Build out site 1550.75 Build out site % 25.95% Pervious Open Space North 1064.50 South East 488.75 South West 392.75 Open Space 1,946 Open Space% 32.56% Pavers/skirt ~5.50 % 78 SHEET TITLE INTEGRATED DESIGN TEAM PROJECT NO: MODEL FILE: DRAWN BY: COPYRIGHT: SHEET 36 Z009 Jeffrey H Woodruff 312_W_Hyman_04082022.pln Project No. 116 /Users/jeffreyw/Documents/Cloud Hill Design/312 W Hyman/312_W_Hyman_04082022.plnPowder Day Skiiing, LLC, David A Tarrab Mees Forestry Site Coverage 312 W Hyman Ave 312 W Hyman Ave Lots P+Q, Block 46 Aspen CO 81611 USA/ Pitkin County UGB, City of Aspen 312 W Hyman Ave Aspen CO 81611 USA Account # R000145 Parcel ID # 273512464006 Landscape Architect (At Final) Contractor Structural Engineer As per contractor Civil Grading and Drainage Boundaries Unlimited (At Final) COA- HPO Site Visit08/22/21 Cloud Hill Design, LLC Snowmass Snowmass CO 81654 USA COA- HPC Conceptual02/26/22 COA- HPC Approval03/23/22 1,210.75 sq ft 488.75 sq ft 392.75 sq ft 760.25 sq ft 680.25 sq ft 271.75 sq ft 464.75 sq ft 1,046.5 sq ft 12.27'2.62' 307.5 sq ft 32.25 sq ft E EG OS W1 2 3 4 5 678 9 10 1112131415 16790479037902 7901 7901 7901 790179 0 2 7902 790379 0 3 7 9 0 4 Grav e l o f f alley SCALE: 1/8" = 1'-0" 1 First Floor Forestry NW Z009 North West Garage/Trash Enclosure Strengths: º Aligned with existing site disturbance, the railroad tie retaining wall º Leaves the largest open space in the backyard º No/little impact to trees #3, #4 and #5 and no impact to Aspens along East property line º Does not interfere with existing utilities (maybe gas, but not electric) º Benefits to house across alley (north), views to Shadow Mountain º Minor negative to St Moritz, but ridge line is 12'-6" and grade steps down 3' grade (from the property line to the NE corner of the garage) and 6' retaining wall, so impact is negligible to St Moritz º Distance between the Garage and the Residence is 11', goes to 12' with the 2.5' side setback º Keep all trees, gravel between the alley and the garage º Distance between the property line and Tree #1 is 15'-7", if the neighboring retaining wall is plum and does not encroach on the West property line. Weaknesses: º Minimal impacts to Trees #1 and #2, development, both permeable and hardscape in the Tree #1 drip-line 13' from retaining wall to tree #1 (layout assumes less than 5' setback or additional/variance to combined side setback in R6. If the retaining wall was plum this measurement would be 15' º Impact to existing utilities, gas, which runs to the West and South of tree #1 º Difficult entry, entry from the East due to grade changes at the alley º Drainage 79 HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION WORK SESSION AGENDA APRIL 27, 2022 1. Overview of the process a project goes through when it is Historic (10 min Review) a. Pre-App Meeting b. Conceptual review c. Final Review d. Building Permit submittal which includes review by i. Zoning department [FAR & heights, for historic projects no RDS] ii. Engineering department [grading and drainage] iii. parks department [tree mitigation and landscape plan] iv. CMP v. Water Efficiency [ irrigation review] vi. Plan Check [mechanical, structural, and envelope code compliance] 2. Pre-App information & project monitoring information – Info from HPC (10 min discussion) a. Updates to pre-apps to include 3D information, more specifically speak to clearly demonstrating what is existing vs what is proposed b. Importance of fenestration - conceptual vs final c. Outlines for submittal of project monitoring information to streamline the process clearly provide i. documentation of existing conditions ii. HPC approval conditions iii. Proposed changes 3. Discuss Aspen Modern Projects (30-45min) a. Compatible Guidelines -review on a case by case basis b. Retaining Original Materials – period construction materials differences to consider c. Landscape – differences from standard projects 4. HPC Schedule – Next Work Sessions (10 min) a. Maintenance b. Sustainability Goals and compatibility with HPC projects 80