HomeMy WebLinkAboutlanduse case.AP.1200 Tiehack Rd.A124-00
f'\
CASE NUMBER
PARCEL In #
CASE NAME
PROJECT ADDRESS
PLANNER
CASE TYPE
OWNER! APPLICANT
REPRESENTATIVE
DATE OF FINAL ACTION
CITY COUNCIL ACTION
PZ ACTION
ADMIN ACTION
BOA ACTION
DATE CLOSED
BY
A124-00
2735-113-09008
Lot 7 Maroon Creek Club
Lot 7 Maroon Creek Club
Sarah Oates/James Lindt
Insubstantial Plat Amendment
Hansen Construction
C/O David Guthrie
9/25/01
Plat Recorded
9/26/01
J. Lindt
i"'""\
~
11
l\"d+
:eci
"
Sent By: William Lukes + Associates;
. ,
-<-....'...
970 920 6986;
May~O 11:26AM;
Page 1
"
r\
, J
,'--"
,
WILLIAM LUKIS + ASSOCIATE'
PROJF.CT MANAGEMENT
ARCHll.'ECTURF.
24 April 2000
Cf2.0 - ::::O~i/
001"-( 7b J./. G-(/ T'1~II:=
Ron Robertson
RC Robertson Architects, Inc.
417 Main Street, Studio A
Carbondale, Colorado 61623
re: Maroon Creek Club Lot 7
Site and Architecture Review Committee Approvals
----
Ron:
This will confirm that the Site and Architecture Review Committee of the Maroon Creek Club Master
Association, by a vote of the Committee members present at the Apri/19, 2000 meeting with Andy Hecht
abstaining, granted the following approval:
Schematic Plan [preliminary! Architectural and Landscape Approvals for Lot 7 as
provided by the Maroon Creek Club Design Guidelines based on plans received 4/5/00.
~
":sI
This is a preliminary approval. Approval to proceed with construction was not
included in the approval granted.
By the vote of the Committee members. present, this approval is subject to the following conditions:
2.
Standard Conditions of Accroval:
1. No variances from the Maroon Creek Club Design Guidelines are given or implied by this
approval, except as specifically identified herein.
Payment to the Association of the Design Review Fee prior to the next review if this fee has not
already been paid and payment to the Association of the Road Impact Fee prior to the start of
construction.
Prior to the start of construction, the owner must have completed the following;
A. Signed and retumed the Agreement Regarding Final Landscape and Irrigation Plans
which provides that the owner agrees to immediately cease all construction activity on
the site upon written notice from the Association if the Site and Architecture Review
Committee has not approved a final landscape plan. Such notice may be sent at any
time after a date forty-five (45) calendar days after the date of Final (construction
document) Architectural Approval. The owner must further stipulate that construction
activity will not resume until a final landscape plan is approved by SARC.
Signed and returned the Maroon Creek Club Master Association Landscape and
Grading Completion Guaranty.
Provided a Letter of Credit or equivalent financial
security in the amount of Seventy-Five Thousand
Dollars [$75,000,00] provided in a form and from a
source as is acceptable to the Association, all as
provided in the Landscape and Grading Completion
Guaranty.
B.
3.
C.
.POlT' OFfCCE Box 82.89
ASI'I'.N COLOR....DO
.
8.61Z
9tO.92.o.69:l9 fAX 920.6986
"'"
.
Sent By: William Lukes + Associates;
.....J.. ....
970 920 6986;
May.2-00 11:29AM;
o
Page 2/2
<
r1
24 Apnl 2000
Page 2
'.......
\
--
Soecific Conditions of Aooroval'
4. Additional items required to be submitted to SARC for review and approval:
A. Proposed tree sizes complying with the Design Guidelines,
B. Exterior lighting plan, fixtures, and lamps.
C. Material and color samples.
5. A variance was granted for the location of the parking wall near the Lot 8 property line, with the
< concurrence of the Lot a owners in attendance.
6. A variance was granted for the revised location of the house and the revised porte cochere,
subject to the following conditions:
A. The roof of the porte cochere will be at least 25 feet from the edge of the road,
B. The house will be approXimately 40 feet from the edge of the road, and so the porte
cochere will extend approximately 15 feet from the house.
C. Prior to or at the lime of requesting Final Approval, the applicant shall submit evidence
of a variance being granted by the City of Aspen to allow construction outside the
existing building envelope as proposed, or an approved plat amendment which revises
the building envelope. SARC's approval is based on the geotechnical recommendations
to avoid unstable slopes within the eastem portion of the existing building envelope.
7. A variance was granted for any deviation required from the landscape portion of the Design
Guidelines to comply with the geotechnical engineer's recommendation to avoid irrigated
landscaping in the area of slope instability to the east of the building enveiope.
8. The landscaping in the front island adjacent to the road shall provide screening of the front of
the house while not interfering with road maintenance or snow plowing,
9. Driveway material shall comply with the DesIgn Guidelines.
10. A stone mockup panel, minimum 4' X 4' and showing exact stone mixture and jointing, will be
submitted to SARC for review and approval [on site] no later than the time of Final Review and
prior to any work on site.
~
'01
Please be advised that the approvals granted by Pitkin County for the Maroon Creek Club require that
the Club obtain a written certification, signed by a licensed archltec~ as to the floor areas for the project,
calculated my the method specified in the approvals, and that this certification also be included in any
application for a buIlding permit
Approval by the Site and Architecture Committee of the Maroon Creek Club Master Association does not
constitute an assurance that the design of the project or the application complies with all applicable
provisions of the County approvals for the Maroon Creek Club or that a building permit will be issued.
It is the owner's responsIbility to obtain building and other permits as may be required by the City of
Aspen,
Please let me know if you have any questions regarding the Committee's action, or if we can be of any
further assistance. We will retum one set of the approved plans to you for the owner's records upon
payment of the required fees and deposits, as determined by the Association.
~U L(v\
William Lukes AlA
Architectural Advisor,
Maroon Creek Club Master Association
~
V
copies:
Gary Albert, President, MCC Master Association
John Dickow, SARC
.. . ',C
'-
[)
eON$TRU eTI ON
October 2, 2000
Chris Bendon
City of Aspen Community Development
Dear Chris,
Attached is the application for an insubstantial plat amendment for Lot 7 located in the Maroon
Creek Club Subdivision.
Included in that application are three copies of:
1. A draft plat from Schmueser, Gordon, Meyer showing:
a) The soil Instability area as determined by CTL Thompson located at the rear of the lot
(totaling about 2,208 square feet),
b) The location and size of the encroachment outside the current building envelope located
at the front of the lot (totaling 471 square feet). This encroachment is about 250 square
feet less than our previous draft application dated 2/9/99.
2. A letter authorizing David Guthrie to represent the owners of Lot 7 as to the contents of this
application.
3. The title commitment
IV/if 4.
Architectural plans from R.C. Robertson Architects which include landscaping plans from
Environment Factory, Inc. (Shannon Murphy)
5. The Lot 7 & 8 soil instability report from CTL Thompson
6. Fees ($480.00)
7. A copy of The Maroon Creek SARC conditional approval dated April 24, 2000 allowing the
variance encroachment.
The precedent has been set next door at Loti':rext for Jamie Hartrich to allow the building to
encroach into the setback at the front of the lot in essence to trade the large part of the original
building envelope that is unstable for a smaller, geologically stable portion of the front yard
setback. We are seeking the same simple tradeoff via a staff reviewed minor plat amendment. I
believe that this is the process you and I have discussed as the most appropriate. Please advise
me ASAP if that is not correct.
city variance letter9-29-0Q,doc
P 970,920,1558 F 970.920,3038 P,O. Box 10493 Aspen, CO 81612
.
'-
..
r'\.
n
CON S T Rue T ION
The Maroon Creek SARC has already given the setback variance approval and is going to
review this for final design approval October 18, 2000 and I am submitting for a building permit
10/2. Part of their approval is based on the City of Aspen setback variance approval and I would
like some assistance in the form of an approval or a letter from you establishing that this
variance can and will happen as I am in a bit of a "Catch -22" situation where the MCC wants
approval from you as a requirement for approval and the City wants the same approval from
MCC as a requirement for approval.
Since the hardship precedent has been clearly established next door I believe this is fairly
simple and would appreciate any assistance you can give in order to expedite the approval.
Thank you,
h~~
David Guthrie
city variance letter9-29-00,doc
P 970,920.1558 F 970.920.3038 P,O. Box 10493 Aspen, CO 81612
.,
1""'\
J
,.-.,.
[~.J
MEMORANDUM
To:
Sarah Oates, Zoning Officer
Ben Ludlow, Project Engineer ~
From:
Date: October 23, 2000
Re: Maroon Creek Club Lot 7 Plat Ammendment
1. All lot acreage must be shown within 0.001 acres.
2. There needs to be a description of all survey monuments, both set and found, which
marks the boundaries of the lot and a description of all monuments used in
conducting the survey.
3. There needs to be a note stating that the survey was performed within the past 12
months.
4. The Title Policy signature block needs to be notarized.
5. The names of all abutting lots need to be indicated. If the abutting lot is unplatted,
then it must be noted as so,
''-''A
C)
" .J
130 S. Galena SI.
Aspen CO 81611
(970) 920-5090
(970) 920-5439, fax
Aspen/Pitkin
Community
Development
Department
Fax
To:
([)CDAJ'Id.,~, L/
qd-O~303@
From:
5cvrcJ.-,o cIt",-..::;
~
iO/~3
Fax:
Pages:
Phone:
Date:
Re:
C-Q)cJ.-,
=r
CC:
o Urgent 0 For Review 0 Please Comment 0 Please Reply
o Please Recycle
· Comments: !A+t~ CV'('O-- ~ ~ 'J' ~-o*.
C_C/d-Y'"\~--t5 - W' ~ k1->;n.A/ 1"F "jDU
h~CL- qUILS+, ~5 .~ --fh*-- c.-R-,c>--'--'O:S ~
---+-0 ct>.ft-- yY)~ 0'1'107 +0 +k- G.l1 5Ir1Y'6'
z.+,f ,
.....J
.~
LEWIN CONSTRUCTION
()
, l
INC.
TRANSMITTAL SHEET
TO:
City Zoning + Engineering
COMPANY:
FROM:
Jeff Lewin
DATE:
8/14/01
FAX NUMBER:
TOTAL NO. OF PAGES INCLUDING COVER:
3
PHONE NUMBER:
SENDER'S REFERENCE NUMBER:
RE:
YOUR REFERENCE NUMBER:
Maroon Creek Club - Lot #7
o URGENT 0 FOR REVIEW
o PLEASE COMMENT 0 PLEASE REPLY
o PLEASE RECYCLE
NOTES/COMMENTS:
Attached is a draft of the requested amended plat for Maroon Creek Club Lot #7.
If acceptable as presented, this is our final document necessary to obtain an approved
building permit. Please let me know if any modifications are required.
Thank you,
Jeff Lewin
~mte~ :=t:: Ped,w-t:crr6p ,;vfr??76 Dc9C:5
-r~ (<?ICi!/f({J? e!? ~/f/uvnrcr-<IH::f, {if
>-"'1]/ He ..5I-fp</t.(;:? t-I~~ (4-et"p&Z~
:e.cr '11-I"W-5'Pl''(.
lH~~
970 963 2000 / FX 2111
425 BOYD DR. CARBONDALE, CO 81623
~
r"\
f1
SOILS AND FOUNDATION INVESTIGATION
TWO PROPOSED RESIDENCES
LOTS 7 AND 8, MAROON CREEK CLUB
PITKIN COUNTY, COLORADO
Copy
Prepared For:
ROBERT TROWN & ASSOCIATES
P. O. Box 6820
Snowmass Village, CO 81615
Attention: Mr. Jeff Hancox
Job No. GS-2287
October 23, 1997
,A_'J!'''''}f ^T 7'.',>>"
.""";<"'/ ;'''';I:::)~
~
CTL/THOMPSON, INC.
CONSULTING ENGINEERS
234 CENTER DRIVE. GLENWOOD SPRINGS, COLORADO 81601 . (970) 945-2809
r-,
n
[R]
TABLE OF CONTENT
SCOPE
SUMMARY OF CONCLUSIONS
SITE CONDITIONS .
PROPOSED CONSTRUCTION
SUBSURFACE CONDITIONS
EXISTING LANDSLIDE
SITE GRADING
FOUNDATIONS
FLOOR SLABS
BASEMENT AND CRAWLSPAC@e) py
SURFACE DRAINAGE
LIMITATIONS
FIGURES 1 AND 2 - LOCATIONS OF EXPLORATORY BORINGS
FIGURE 3 - SUMMARY LOGS OF EXPLORATORY BORINGS
FIGURES 4 AND 5 - GRADATION TEST RESULTS
FIGURE 6 - EXTERIOR FOUNDATION WALL DRAIN
1
1
2
2
3
3
4
5
6
7
8
8
ROBERT TROWN & ASSOC.
CTUT GS-2287
SCOPE
I"""',
n
~
This report presents the results of our soils and foundation investigation for
the proposed residences to be built at Lots 7 and 8, Maroon Creek Club in Pitkin
County, Colorado. We explored subsurface conditions at each lot to provide
foundation recommendations for the proposed buildings. This report includes a
description of the subsurface conditions found in our exploratory borings, a
recommended foundation system for the buildings and geotechnical criteria for it
and construction criteria for details influenced by the subsoils. Our report was
prepared from data developed during our field exploration, laboratory testing,
engineering analysis and our experience. A summary of our conclusions is
presented below.
SUMMARY OF CONCLUSIONS
5.
ROBERT TROWN & ASSOC.
CTUT Gs..2287
1.
A head scarp of a~~'n!' landslide is located northeast of
the building enveIWdll.t . e recommend the stability of the
slope be monitored and no is bance to a part of Lot 8 building
envelope.
2.
Our exploratory borings penetrated 0.5 foot of organic clays above
medium dense to very dense, silty to clayey gravels with cobble and
boulder. In our TH-2, 1.5 feet of man placed fill was above the natural
gravels. Free ground water was found at 20 feet in our TH-4 during
our field investigation.
3.
The buildings can be founded with footings on the natural gravels. A
maximum allowable soil bearing pressure is presented in the
FOUNDATIONS section.
4.
Slabs-on-grade can bear on the natural gravels or on densely
compacted structural fill (see SITE GRADING and FLOOR SLABS
sections).
A ground surface slope away from the buildings should be maintained
at all times to reduce the risk of wetting soils below foundations and
wet or damp conditions in basements and crawl spaces (see SITE
DRAINAGE).
1
1""'1
n
~
SITE CONDITIONS
The Maroon Creek Club is located approximately 1 mile west of Aspen,
Colorado. The Buttermilk Ski Area is adjacent to the west and south. Maroon Creek
is below the development to the east. A golf course is to the north. Highway 82
runs through the development from east to west.
Lots 7 and 8 are located to the south of Highway 82. Access is from Tiehack
Road which borders the site to the west. The lots are located on a comparatively flat,
gently sloped area at the top of very steep slopes that drop down to the east to
Maroon Creek. Ground surfaces in the planned building envelopes slope down to
the east at grades measured and visually estimated at 5 to 10 percent. Ground
surfaces to the east of the planned building envelopes slope down to Maroon Creek
at grades measured and visually estimated at 80 to 90 percent. Vegetation consists
of scattered aspen trees with un~rowth of grasses, weeds and brush. The west
part of the lots are covered wit'\::P 8f3'Y
We observed the head scarp of a landslide adjacent to the northeast part of
the building envelope on lot 8. Slope stability issues are beyond the scope of this
report. It appears that the slopes to the northeast of the building envelope on lot 8
are unstable and may influence structures built in the designated building envelope.
We would be glad to prepare a proposal for an investigation to address slope
stability issues, if desired.
PROPOSED CONSTRUCTION
Building plans for Lot 7 had not been developed and those for Lot 8 are
preliminary at this writing. We were told a one or two story, wood frame custom
residence will be built on each lot. The buildings exteriors will have stone and wood
veneers. Lowest level floors in areas of deeper cuts will be walkout basements.
Some ground level floors will be above basements or will be structural with a
crawlspace below. We were told that the lower level floor elevation on Lot 8 would
ROBERT TROWN & ASSOC.
CTI..{T GS-2287
2
r,
n
[RJ
be 82 feet 6 inches. The lower level floor elevation on Lot 7 has not been
determined. For our analysis we assumed that foundation loads will be
approximately 1,500 to 3,000 pounds per lineal foot along bearing walls and
maximum interior column loads will be 30 kips.
The buildings will be stepped into the natural slopes at the site. We
anticipate that maximum excavation cuts will be approximately 10 to 15 feet deep.
We recommend the building footprint be located as close to Tiehack Road and a
distance from the top of the slope leading down to Maroon Creek as feasible.
SUBSURFACE CONDmONS
Four (4) exploratory borings were drilled at the locations shown on Figures
1 and 2 to investigate subsurface conditions. Drilling was directed by our
engineering geologist who logg~he soils and obtained samples for laboratory
testing. Laboratory test results ~e ~\lres 4 and 5. Summary logs of our
exploratory borings and results of penetrat;';; lsistance tests are shown on Figure
3.
Our exploratory borings penetrated 0.5 foot of organic clays above medium
dense to very dense, silty to clayey gravels with cobble and boulder. In our TH-2,
1.5 feet of man placed fill was above the natural gravels. Free ground water was
found at 20 feet in our TH-4 during our field investigation.
EXISTING LANDSLIDE
An existing head scarp of an apparently active landslide is located northeast
of the building envelope on Lot 8. We recommend no disturbance on part of the Lot
8 building envelope. Figure 1 shows the area. We suggest the owner consider the
installation of an inclinometer near the existing scarp to monitor movement prior to
building on the site. In any event the scarp should be located via field survey and
monitored for movement. Building outside of the defined area not to be disturbed
ROBERT TROWN & ASSOC.
cn.;r GS-2287
3
t""'.
f"\
.,. .''l
~
as shown may be appropriate to protect the building, however, the activity level of
the existing slide is not known. Locating of water lines or irrigation lines between the
building and the top of the steep slopes to Maroon Creek should be avoided.
Wetting of the ground between the building and the head scarp should be avoided.
We recommend the building footprint be located as close to Tiehack Road and a
distance from the top of the slope leading down to Maroon Creek as feasible.
SITE GRADING
No fill will be below the building foundation on either lot 7 or lot 8. Existing
fill should be removed from below and within 5 horizontal feet of the planned
building footprints. Fill may be required to achieve subgrade elevations for interior
floor slabs and exterior concrete flatwork. Areas to receive fill or bear slabs-on-
grade should be grubbed and stripped of vegetation, existing fill or other deleterious
material. The resulting sUrfaC~ould be scarified to at least 6 inches deep,
moisture conditioned to withi'\,;,e~\/oPtimum moisture content and
compacted to at least 95 percent of standlr:r Ploctor maximum dry density (ASTM
o 698). Fill can consist of on site silty to clayey gravels or similar soils free of
organics, debris, rock larger than 4 inches in diameter or other deleterious materials.
The fill should be moisture conditioned to within 2 percent of optimum moisture
content and placed in maximum 8 inch thick loose lifts and compacted. Fill below
interior floor slabs should be compacted to at least 98 percent of the maximum dry
density determined by the standard Proctor density test (ASTM 0 698). Fill placed
below exterior slabs-on-grade should be compacted to at least 95 percent of ASTM
o 698. Fill placed in areas not to be built on can be placed as common fill and be
compacted to 90 percent of ASTM D 698. The performance of the fill is critical to
structure performance. A representative of CTL/Thompson. Inc. should observe fill
placement and check fill density and moisture content during placement.
We anticipate that site excavations will be a maximum of 10 to 15 feet tall.
Excavations will expose silty to clayey gravels with cobble and boulder. Excavation
should be possible with "standard" excavation equipment used in this area,
ROBERT mOWN & ASSOC.
CTlIT as.2287
4
,.-....,
n
~
Excavated slopes will tend to collapse and flatten. Excavation sides should
be sloped or braced. We recommend temporary excavations greater than 5 feet
deep be braced or laid back at slopes of 1.5: 1 (horizontal to vertical) or flatter above
the water table. We believe the silty to clayey gravels are Type C as described in the
October, 1989 Occupation Safety and Health Administration (OSHA) Standards
published by the Department of Labor governing excavations. The publication
indicates a maximum temporary slope of 1.5:1 (horizontal to vertical) for Type C
soils above the water table. We should view the excavations to confirm that soils
and bedrock are as anticipated and judge if our recommendations are appropriate.
Soils removed from the excavations should not be stockpiled at the edge of
the excavation. We recommend the excavated soils be placed at a horizontal
distance from the top of the excavation equal to at least the depth of the excavation.
Free ground water enc~red in our TH-4 at 20 feet during our field
investigation. Depending upon ~e~~lne of year water may be present.
If free ground water is encountered, we r~nlend the excavations be sloped to
a positive gravity outfall or to sumps where water can be removed by pumping.
We recommend permanent slopes be no steeper than of 2.5:1 (horizontal to
vertical). Care must be taken to ensure re-vegetation of all excavated slopes.
Erosion control re-vegetation matting and planting of shrubs legumes, trees or other
vegetation with extensive root systems should be considered.
FOUNDATIONS
Excavation to achieve footing elevations will be between 3 and 13 feet below
the natural slopes at the site. At footing elevations our exploratory borings
penetrated medium dense to very dense, clayey gravels with cobble and boulder.
We recommend founding the buildings with footings bearing on the natural gravels.
Footings bearing on the natural gravels may experience 3/4-inch total settlement and
differential settlement of about 1/2 of the actual total settlement. Footings for the
ROBERT TROWN & ASSOC.
CTI.JT GS-2287
5
~
n
\. ...,~
CJ
buildings can be designed and constructed with the following criteria:
1. Footings bearing on the undisturbed natural, silty to clayey gravels
can be designed for a maximum soil pressure of 4,000 pst. Material
loosened during the excavation or forming process should be
removed from footing areas or compacted prior to placing concrete;
2. Foundation walls for continuous footings should be reinforced top and
bottom to span undisclosed loose soil pockets. We recommend steel
reinforcement equivalent to that required for a simple span of 12 feet.
Reinforcement should be designed by a qualified structural engineer;
3. Minimum footing sizes are desirable. We recommend a minimum
width of 16 inches for continuous footings and at least 2 feet by 2 feet
for isolated column footings. Larger sizes may be required based on
the structural loads;
4.
The soils beneath exterior footings should be protected from freezing.
We recommend footings be at least 36 inches below finished exterior
grades. The local building department should be contacted to verify
the required frost protection depth.
Copy
FLOOR SLABS
The floor. levels we assumed are shown on Figure 2. Basement floors will be
slabs-on-grade. Some ground level floors will be above a basement or will be
structurally supported by the foundation with a crawlspace below the floor. We
recommend floor slabs bear on the natural gravels after moisture conditioning and
compacting or on structural fill built with the on site clayey gravels or similar as
discussed above under SITE GRADING. Floor slabs can be designed and
constructed using the following criteria:
1. Floor slabs should bear on the natural gravels after moisture
conditioning and compacting or on structural fill constructed as
discussed above under SITE GRADING;
2. Slabs-on-grade should be separated from exterior walls and interior
bearing members. Vertical movement of the slabs should not be
restricted;
ROBERT TROWN & ASSOC.
CTlJT GS-2287
6
I".,
o
~;,
~
3. Plumbing and utilities which pass through slabs should be thoroughly
'pressure tested prior to placing concrete and isolated from the slabso
with sleeves;
4. Frequent control joints should be provided. The American Concrete
Institute (ACI) recommends maximum joint spacing of 15 to 20 feet to
control cracking.
BASEMENT AND CRAWLSPACE WAllS
Foundation walls will be subjected to lateral earth pressures. These walls are
restrained and cannot move, therefore, they should be designed for the "at-rest"
lateral earth pressure. Assuming the on-site silty to clayey gravels are used as
backfill, we recommend using an equivalent fluid density of 50 pet to calculate
lateral earth pressure. The above equivalent fluid density does not include
allowances for sloping backfill, hydrostatic pressures, live loads or loads from
adjacent structures. The upper~et of wall backfill should consist of the more
clayey on site soils. \..., 0 p y
Water from surface run-off (precipitation, snow melt, irrigation) frequently
flows through backfill placed adjacent to foundation walls and collects on the
surface of the comparatively impermeable soils occurring at the bottom of the
foundation excavation. This can cause damp or wet conditions in below grade
areas of the building and wetting of soils below foundations. To reduce the
accumulation of water, we recommend a foundation drain. The drain should consist
of a 4-inch diameter open jOint or slotted PVC pipe encased in free draining gravel.
The drain should lead to a positive gravity outfall or a sump to be mechanically
pumped. A typical foundation drain detail is shown on Figure 6.
Crawlspace ventilation should be provided. Backfill placed adjacent to
foundation walls should be moisture conditioned and compacted to at least 95
percent of standard Proctor maximum dry density (ASTM D 698).
ROBERT TROWN & ASSOC.
CTlfT GS-2287
7
t"'\
(\
~
SURFACE DRAINAGE
The performance of foundations, floor slabs and concrete flatwork is
influenced by moisture conditions in the subsoils. Limiting the amount of moisture
introduced to the subsoils is important to the performance of foundations, floor
slabs and concrete f1atwork. During spring snowmelt sheetwash can be expected
to occur across this site. Wetting of foundation soils can be reduced by grading the
ground surface to cause rapid run-oft of water away from the buildings. We
recommend a slope of at least 12 inches in the first 10 feet. We recommend
incorporating a small berm or drainage swale above the buildings into the
landscaping plan to direct sheetwash around and away from the buildings.
Wetting or drying of the open foundation excavations should be avoided. We
recommend landscaping within 5 feet of the buildings be with native flora which
requires a minimum amount of ~tion. Impermeable membranes used for weed
control block evaporation and ~eQ \~d adjacent to the buildings. We
recommend using a geotextile fabric suctS:: .lIrafi for weed control which allows
normal evaporation to occur. Sprinkler heads should be no closer than 5 feet from
the buildings and be directed away from the buildings. Snow which accumulates on
the roof or as a result of plowing should not be allowed to accumulate adjacent to
the buildings. We suggest using snow breaks, heat tape, gutters and downspouts
to melt snow on the roof and drain moisture away from the buildings. Roof
downspouts and drains should discharge well beyond the limits of all backfill.
Splash blocks or downspout extensions should be provided at all discharge
locations. Snow removal should result in snow being piled away from the building.
UMITATIONS
Our exploratory borings were spaced to obtain a reasonably accurate picture
of the subsurface. Variations in these subsurface conditions not shown by our
exploratory borings will occur. We should observe the completed excavations to
confirm the soils are as anticipated from our exploratory borings.
ROBERT TROWN & ASSOC.
CTUT GS.2287
8
(')
()
4
~
Our report was based on conditions disclosed by our exploratory borings,
results of laboratory testing, engineering analysis and our experience. Criteria
presented reflects the proposed buildings as we understand them. We should be
advised if the final design differs from our assumptions to permit us to re-evaluate
our conclusions.
This investigation was conducted in a manner consistent with the level of care
and skill ordinarily exercised by geotechnical engineers currently practicing under
similar conditions in the locality of this project. No other warranty, express or
implied, is made. If we can be of further service or if you have questions regarding
this report, please call.
CTl.!THOMPSON, INC.
Wilson L. hLiv" Bowden
Professional Geologist
Copy
Reviewed by:
John Mechling, P.E.
Branch Manager
LB:JM:cd
(3 copies sent)
ROBERT TROWN & ASSOC.
CTl.{T GS.2287
9
to""
t"""
--
o
o
~
mO
:J..J
..JO
UU
r"'~~
w"-'
a:::z
u:J
o
zU
l()OZ
0-
..-.a:::~
0<("-'
..J::::Eii'
,....--...,
<(
W
0:::
<(
-:r*
L ...
z
a
~
~
o
u
"---"
a
I-
a
--1
CXJ
~ I-
] a
E8 --1
i"
I)
0-
e 01
Q., .5~
1:1
=o'l:J
::1% I)
lD .Q
~1)2
o g-li
0--
f:o
~~:
8
e
0'9
......---
".---
/
,
,
=
""8l
M.U.llioOO
\
~
"
.
;.;
"'6
~
,........
I-
a
--1
...
tiI
c::
(I)
C>
Z
-
a:::
o
m
>-
a:::
o
..-.
<C
a:::
o
..J
ll.
X
W
I.&..
o
(I)
Z
o
..-.
<C
U
o
..J
~
C'l
C'l
~
o
%
.Q
o
...
f'""'.
,~
1".
r".
t"""
o
o
<(
a:::
mO
:J..J
..JO
UU
~ ft
...>-
w"-'
a:::z
u:J
o
zU
"oz
0-
I-a:::~
o<(!:::
..J:::Ea..
--.-"
o 6
-
.-"--
---
'--
"
g~ '\lllll~
iil~
~i'i
~~&...
~
/
/
C'l
.
01
j;:
~*
..
Sl
"
.
...
r:
;.;
"'6
o
III
.-"
;'
;'
;'
;'
--
-
-
~
~
/~
--.-" ~
-
(I)
C>
Z
-
a:::
o
m
>-
a:::
o
..-.
<-
a:::
o
..J
a..
X
w
I.&..
o
(I)
Z
o
-
..-.
<(
U
o
..J
--
;'
/
/
\
u
t-.
co
~
I
~
o
Z
.Q
o
...
Wl
.
01
c::
1""\ S'
C1 .. .!!
c.S 0 ".c
,... 10_
e8 f c
':i' .. .. ;.2c
- . . --
c:-e .!! ::I . .QIO 0"
0 .,,=t;C EOI 0::1 C.
0 E c.~ ::1.5: "SO o!:!c
:;:c o Ee z= 0::1 0.-
o~ .. . .Q "C c x,2
"i . CD~:g C'l~:ii . ...:" -
Ole 10 :0 =-" 'ii.. . c- .c
..Q c ~"".c.5: :;::c >.. OC .0
. .QlOf .......,....c- .!!lc 0 .cO
> " Oc 00 go 00 gll) "50 ,,0
.ci! O. . . -10
.... -' II) _. ::Icc "0. ...
E -- ~ C'l ~ C'l 00 .! oX =. 00
:!::o ..c: >oj!
;t" -00 000 -= .c:;: o ~,2 '1:- -
::I :!:: gO o Wl 0 ". 10
'i'i .Q WlO. 0-0 ~01O E "Sc
~-;; :':-E .Q OJ _ . 10 10 !I.g
. 0 ~:.: 01::1 iii ~;t 01:1 ,,"0 fo!:! ..!:!
E ~>. . ~ ..- :Q'IO
0- OC_.c 'ii. .!:!.5:'l:0 .0. c~:.: ."'0
_0 - . ::1-=
UE ---OJ :a5L.o .Q="C "E ::10 ~.c
. "'lic . 0" c E IOU
~ 0>. . 0 - E e..1: c
~.. .c~~o- 0 .co~OC'l 01.0 IOU fg
-- .... f"tJ f- .......cc 10 'i",.1:-1I) .......,.... 1:...", 01.. t>>C
:~ f 0 e~ E c-,
r-. >. OI~ . e" oX lli1iE~i = 0 CD '1:.. 0
010 01 ~,,~ .!!1iEei "5 'I: -:E f::lf 0::1 "
.. ,,-g "'c
01 .. ~ oc e:E E"5'ii. .Q e:E ~"5'ii. ~c::l .QO. t>>o
.f! "'600 -- 10 ~.. C
.0 ~:~ ia .! o :.c la 10100 ::~ ~.c & 'r; 10
.20 tI ..- e_ oc
C" "'6 ~lDG) 0"". 10_ 10 -Ot>> --E 0= :I .Q.2
0 0" g.Qc tlO -~o
0" .>- ::!!IO ~i~Sg 0 :.2Cf. .S!J!.... f - .
flc -tI f::lC 'i'i 5~ [;ci - E'I: ""0 01"-- eo1: (I)
=.. oe " ~o ::t: 0 C>
Otl ....01 C1 .Q" 0_ o.~o .5: .5: .Q .ESE -O).!:
0.0) 01 t:~ e-
x = Z
.....,...~
0 0/ N a:::
l+- I ,... 0
Z ill] IZI m ---- -8- --D- I Iii
..... .-.' ..... m
C1 ~
..... >-
...J Z
a:::
0
..-.
f'""'. <(
ElevatIon In teet a:::
0
..J
ll.
0 II) ~ X
II) 0 0 0 W
0 0) 0) co co I"-
,...
I.&..
'~do8 0
~ (I)
0 /C'l C>
II) 0
....~ ..J
I \I >-
:r:...J
......... a:::
0/ I I <(
::::E
I"- " c C'l ::::E
. 0
- E.... .- ,... :J
.9 ::ID-"'o ~ (I)
IO~:O>
lO.3j.!:!.!!
Wlg ~ ......... ~i~~.
f "
:r:...J
.........
1""\.
.-. ., 0 0
~ ~ I
II)
CD
C'l 0) ~~~'m.,t:~
I II
:r: ...J
.... .....
00 c
.!:! ,...
- ,...
.3 .. - ~
e- L. D
~:o>
o..!:!.!! II)
00 ...J...J.........
""00
I II
:r:...J
.........
I"""':
0 I"-
0 II) 0 :g 0 ~ R co
C'l
,... 0) 0) co C'l
I
III
C1
Jee.:l ul UOIJDAel3 .
0
Z
.Q
0
...
",
1""\
'I
'"
I
~
25 HR. 7 HR
45 MIN ..1?M!~,:.
100(''':'
HYDROMETER ANALYSIS
TIME READINGS
,6,1:1 ~.m;~,:J9 .M!!'!".A Mlf'J._.1
T
'10Q
U.S. STANDARD SERIES
".;;;9..:49:.39. .."1lL. :,19.:,8.. "-;1
SIEVE ANALYSIS
"
z
::i
<f
Z
~
~
o
:!'
$
:;;
Z
~
~
CLAY (PlASTIC) TO SILT (NON.PLASTIC)
GRAVEL
FINE COARSE
COBBlES
FINE
COAf~E
Sample of SAND, CLAYEY (SC)
From TH-l AT 4 FEET
GRAVEL 29 %
SILT&CLAY~%
PLASTICITY INDEX
SAND 43 %
UQUIDUMIf _%
%
<!l
Z
'"
~
<f
~
z
g
~
o
:!'
~
~
z
~
()
Iii
~
HYDROMETER ANALYSIS
TIME READINGS
SIEVE ANALYSIS
U.S. STANDARD SERIES ClEAR SQUARE OPENINGS
10
:'90
..,~"' 100
76.2 127 200
152
O.
.001
.074 .149 .297 .590 1'.'19"2:'02:38' 4.76
0:42
DIAMETER OF PARTICLE IN MilliMETERS
SAND
FINE MEDIUM COARSE
.002 .005 .009 ,019 .037
....
9.52 19.1 36.1
GRAVEL
FINE COARSE
CLAY (PlASTIC) TO SILT (NON.PlASTlC)
COBBLES
Sample of SAND & GRAVEL, CLAYEY (GC,SC)
From TH-2 AT 9 FEET
GRAVEL 40 %
SllT&CLAY~%
PLASTICITY INDEX
SAND 41 %
UQUIDUMIf _%
%
Gradation
Test Results
JOB NO. GS-2287
FIG. 4
. .
If'""),
:-1:7----.-..----1.
I .
: I
~ i
,-----_.----.1
i
,
,
,
,
J
,
,
I
I
,- ,
I ,
, ,
. I
. ,
\ ~ I
\ f'
, .
\ BACKFILL, 11/
\
\ BELOW GRADE WALL ~ +:._{
~' ENCASE PIPE IN WASHED r:.:':':':::::'--<:'l
SL~~~ \ g~~c~~ 5~G~~EC:6E J~) 1M Ip::Uj
OSHA \ EXTEND GRAVEL TO AT LEAsT V<:.:<:-:::-]
\ 1/2 HEIGHT OF FOOTING. '.:.:::-:::-:.:.:.:<-:.:<.:'
.
\
.
.
.
.
,
\
.
.
!
COVER GRAVEL WITH 1
FILTER FABRIC OR
ROOFING FELT.
\ "-- ..... ..-......-..
\ . . i.:n~~L~i.? j)::/::::u:;:i::::;;:;;:;:::':::/:;':.A ~
NOTE:
DRAIN SHOULD BE AT LEAST 2 INCHES
BELOW BOTTOM OF VOID AND FOOTING AT
THE HIGHEST POINT AND SLOPE DOWNWAR
TO A POSITIVE GRAVITY OUTLET OR TO
A SUMP WHERE WATER CAN BE
REMOVED BY PUMPING.
SLOPE
PER REPORT
I -
PROVIDE PVC SHEETING GLUED
TO FOUNDATION WALL TO REDUCE
MOISTURE PENETRATION.
REiNFORCING STEEL
PER STRUCTURAL
DRAWINGS.
......"'~
2" MINIMUM
8" MINIMUM
OR BEYOND 1: 1
SLOPE FROM BOTTOM
OF FOOTING.
(WHICHEVER IS GREATER)
4-INCH DIAMETER PERFORATED
DRAIN PIPE. THE PIPE SHOULD
BE LAID IN A TRENCH WITH A
SLOPE RANGING BETWEEN
l/S INCH AND 1/4 INCH DROP
PER FOOT OF DRAIN_
EXTERIOR
FOUNDATION WALL DRAIN
JOB NO, GS-2287
FIG. 6
RONALD GA!l.FW.D 1
Al'lOllSW V, HECHT 2
MICHAa I. Hl!lUI.ON a
DAVID l.. IJ;NYO
MA'ITHEW C. l:lEROUSON I
CHRISTOI'HllR I. LACaoIX l.S
CHA.DI. SCHMlT4
"-Ie'\,
SEP,26,2000
.
4:09PM
GARFIELD & HECHT
r",
NO. 743
P.l/5
(j
GARlFlDE1D & HIECHT, P .C,
AITOllNEYs AT LAW
601 BAST HYMAN A\IENtm
ASPEl'I. COLOllADO 81611
TliLEPHONE
(970) 925-1936
=OPIBR
(970) 925-3008
110 M1DLANXl AVENUE
StJlTE 201
BASALT, COLORADO 81621
TELEPHONl!
(970) 927-1936
TELliCOP1Ell.
(970) 927-1783
~ any@rt'AjOT..n.~bI:.com
Website, www.prlieJdhoc!lt.ccm
FACSIMlLE COVER SHEET
Date:
ATTN:
Fax NO.:
ATTN:
Fax No,:
From;
Re:
September 26, 2000
Steve Ehlers
(970) 945-5948
David Guthrie
(970) 920-3038
Andy Hecht
Attached - Lot 7, Maroon Creek Club
PLEASE DELNERAS SOON AS POSSmLE.
TOTAL NUMB1llt OF PAGES 5 (iNCLUDING TIlIS COVER SHEET). IF YOU DO NOT RECEIVE ALL OF THE PAGES,
PLEASE CALL CAlU.A FllJ!EMAN AT (970) 9:25-1936, EXTENSION 203, AS SOON AS POSSIBLE,
IMPORTANT: THIsCOMMtlNICATIONIS INTENDED SOLELY FOR IHB USE OF THBPERSONS NAMED ABOVE OR
OTHERSAUTHORIZEDTORECm'VEIT, n-nsCOMMUNICATIONMAYINCLUDBPR1'V!I.EGEDANDCONFIDENTTAL
INFORMATION AND ANY USE, DISSllMINATlON OR REPRODUCTION BY UNAUTHORIZIlD PWONS IS
ABSOLUTELY PROHIBITED. IF YOU Ii... VE RECEIVED TIiIS COMMUNICATION IN WOR, PLEASE NOTIFY TIiB
SENDER IMMEDIATELY,
(
"
1..llIaadm~1o
N'OIVYork:.B..
1. ,kondlYl_tD J.A1I11I1dzni_1D
DillrT~ofC4lumbill.BIU' l'bicla:U1r
".l'ollll111dmidcdto
I1linoilBlr
S. .bo,drnitled'1O
~.BltI'
~'.--,-'
AmountS O.
PremiumS O.op
Rate: I
AmountS o.OOr
PremiumS 0.0
Rate:
I
Tax CertificaJ: 510.00
i
3, Title to the FEE SIMPLE estate ar interest in the land described or referred to In lids Commitment Is althe
effective date hereof vested In:
~~q'~?p~?t:2t:20
..~
4:10PM
-01.........
f~F\~f".~p.pn~.fif:q1mE
r-"1
(').
I'!i~.~\.
~:';""'lt<'~-
-1:i2;:
COMMITMEN'I' POR TInE INSURANCE
SCHEDULE A
1. Effecdve Date: September 14,2000 at 8:00 AM
CaGe No. PC 113e9PR
2. Policy or Policies. to be Issued:
(a) AL TA Owner's Polley-Form 1992
Proposed Insured:
(b) AL TA Loan Policy-Form 1992
Proposed Insured:
LOTS 7 &. a MAROON CREEK LLC, A COLORADO LIMITED L1ABIUTY COM ANY
~g.. ~1~6
P,2/S
" 4
4, The land referred to in this Commitment is situated In the Oclunly of State of CO ORAOO Ind Is described
as fellows:
LOT 7, MAROON CREEK CLUB, as shown on the Final SUbdIVIsion Plat & PUO for Maroon Creek Club,
recorded No~ember 15, 1993 in Plat Boak 33 at Page 4.
rl'TKlN COUN'l"Y TITLC, INC.
~(11 Eo HOPKINS
ASPEN. CO. g~6t1
970-9:!5-1'66
91O-925~I'I\X
AU l'HOR1ZSO AGENT
~eclUle A-PG.1
is Commitment is invalid
u lsss the Insuring
P visi,,"s and Schedules
A rnd B are allached,
I
I
I
,SSEP.26.2000 _4:~~p"M
..,........ . --. -- - ~
fGiABf:+JlA .~.I-jEC.H.1fLE
~
~~~
SCHEDULED. SECI10N 1
REQumEMENTS
I
nj
,
I
t
,':12, ? ~;J6
P.3/S "
, , .
The following are the requirements to be complied will'!:
ITEM (a) Payment to or for the account of the grantors or mortgagors of ll'!e fuU, consideration fer the
estate or interest to be Insured.
ITEM (b) Proper Inslrument(s) creating the estate or interest tc be insured mUst be execuled and duly
. tiled fer record m-wit
THIS COMMITMENT IS FURNfSHetl FOR INFORMATIONAL PURPOSes O~L V, IT fS NOT A
CONTRACT TO ISSUE TITLE INSURANCE AND SHALL NOT BE CONSTRUED AS SUCH. IN THE
EVENT A PROPOSED INSURED IS NAMED THE COMPANY HERESY RESERVES THE RIGHT TO
MAKE ADDITIONAL ReQUIReMENTS AND/OR ~eEPTIONS AS OEEMEO NEOeSSARY, THe
RECIPIENT OF THIS INFORMATIONAL REPORT HERf;6Y AGReES THAT THE COMPANY HAS
IssueD THIS REPORT BY THEIR REQUEST AND ALTHOUGH WE BELIevE! ALL INFORMATION
CONTAINED HEREIN IS ACCURATE AND CORREer, THE COMPANY SHALL NOT BE CHARGED
WITH ANY FINANCIAL L.JASILI1i' SHOOLD lliAT PROVE TO BE INCORREor AND THE COMPANY
IS NOT OBUGATED TO ISSUE ANY POLICIES OF TITLE INSURANCE.
. JsEP ~?6~?~~0 _ 4:)0PM
~.
fGA~ELD. &. HEC!1JTL E
~~
. ,
,
f:lQ.. ?1~6
P,4/5
.. ,
SCHEDULE B SECTION 2
EXCEPTIONS
The policy or pollcles 10 be issued will contain exceptions to the following unless the same are disposed of 10
the satisfaction of the Company:
1. Rights or claims of parties in possession not shown by the public records.
2. Easements, or claims of easements, not sholNn by the public records.
3. DiscrepanCIes, con1llcts In boundary Ilnes, shortage In area, encroachments, any !'acts which a correct
sUNey and inspection of me premises would disclose and which are not shown by the public records.
4, Any lien, Qr rigllt 10 a lien. for services, labor. or malerial heretofore or hereafter rumlShed, Imposed by law
and not shown by the pUbliC recorcfs,
5. Defects, liens, encUmbrances, advenie claima or other matters. If any, created, first appearing in the public
records or allachlng subsequent to the etreotive date hereof but prior to the date the proposed insured
ecquires of record for vallie the estate or interest or mortgage thereon covered by this Commitment
6. Talles due and payable; and any lax, special assessmen~ charge or lien imposed for water or sewer
seNJce or for any other special taxing district.
7. ~lghl of Ihe proprietor of a vein or lode to extract and remove his ore there~"." should the same be found
to penetrate or intersect the premises hereby granted IInd right of way for ditches or canals constructed by
the authority of the United States as reserved In United Stales Patents recorded MaR:h 15, 1892 In Book
55 at Page 21, AugUst 26. 1911 in Book 55 at Page fa9, August 26. 1911 In Book 55 af Page 191,
September 13, 1934 iI1 Book 162 at Page 400, June 16, 1944 in Book 167 at Page 562 and May 20,1953
in Book 1 eo at Page 155,
e, Easements, rights of way and all matters as disclosed on Plat of SUbject propertY recorded November 15,
1993 in Plat Book 33 at Page 4 and Amended Sheel2 recorded March 31, 199<\ in Plat Book 34 at Pase
23 and Assignment at Plat to Maroon Creek LImIted LIabilitY Company recorded' February 17. 19S4 in
Book 742 at PIIge117 and 121.
,
9. Those terms. conditions, provisions, obligations, easemenlll, restrictions. assessmenlsand all matters as
sel forth i/1 Mesler Oeelaretion of ProtectlveCovenanlS for Maroon Creek Club recorded December 2,
1993 In Book 733 atl'age sse and Flrsl Amendlnentthereto recorded Februaryl17, 1994 in Book 742 at
Page 83, Assignment anll DesisnaUon of SUcceslor Declarant for Maroon Creek Club recorded May 11.
1994 in Book 750 at Page 242, Second Amendment thereto recorded June e, 1994 in Book 752 af Pase
754 end Amended and Restated Third Amendment thereto recorded JulY 215, 19:94 in Book 756 at Page
597, Fourth Amendment thereto recorded Jufy 25, 1994 as Reception No, 398947, and Assignment of
Successor Declarant for Marcon Creek Club, deleting therefrom any restrictions! indicating any preference,
limitation or discrimination based on race, color. religion. sex, handicap, f2mllfal status or national origin.
10. Terms, condldo"s, provisions, obligations and all matters as set forth in SubdIVIsion Improvements
Agreement recorded November 12. 1993 In Bcok 730 at Page 606.
11, Terms. conditIons, prollisions, obffgalions and all matters as set forth in Final Plat Resolution of the Board
of County Commissioners reccrded August 13, 1993 In Book: 721 at Page 245 as Resolution No, 93.104,
12. Avigalion Easement granted 10 Pitkin Counly recorded November 12. 1993 in Book 730 at Page 690,
13. Terms. conditions, proviSions and obligations of Water Service Agreement batween The Clly of Aspen and
Pearce Equities Group II. Um/led UabQlly COmpany, a Utah Umlted LIability Company. recorded
November 15, 1993 In Book 730 at Page 797, Assignment and Alsumption of Water Lease Agreement
recorded November 15, 1993 in Book 730 at Page eS5. Assignment and Assumption Agreement recorded
January 7, 1994 in BooJc 737 at Page 899 and Amended Assignment ahd Assumption Agreement
reCOrded April 11 , 1994 in Sook 747 at Page 191,
ic;
. ..~ ,S~E;f' ~ ~p ~ ~~"20
4: llPM
"*. ..... ..t
fG.~ELP_3:, rFfi!TlE
i
0,
~9; ~1~6
P.5/S.
" ,
. ,
ADDITIONAL INFORMATION
AND DISClOSURES
,
,
The Owner's Policy to be issued, If any shall contilin the fell/owing items in addition t~ the ones set forth above:
,
(1) The Deed of Trust, if any, required underSchedufe B-$ectlon 1.
(2) Water rights, claims or title to water. (NOTE: THIS exCEPTION WlL.L APFo'EAFi ON THE OWNeR'S ANO
MORTGAGE: POLICY TO BE ISSUED HEREUNDER)
Pursuant to InsLlrance RegLllatlon 89-2;
NOTE: Each title entity shall notifY in writing rNery prospec:tive insured In an owner's title Insurance policy felr a
single family residence (including a condominim or toWnhouse unIt) (I) of !hat title enITty's general
requlremems for the deletion of an exception ar slCcJusion to coverage relating to unfiled mechanics or
materialmens liens, except when $i\ld cgverage or Insurance is extended to the Insured uncier the terms of
the policy, A satisfactory affidavit and agreement indemnifylnglhe company against unfiJed mechanics'
and/or Materialmen's Liens executed by the persons indicated in the attached cOpy of .aid afl'ldavit must
be furnished to the Company, Ullon receipt of these items and any olhers requirements 10 be specified by
the Company upon reques~ Pre-printed Item Number 4 may be deleted from the OWner's polley when
issued. Please conlact the Company for further Infonnallon. Notwlthstendlng the foregoing, nothing
Contained in this Paragraph shall be deemed to impose any requIrement upon any title InsLlrer to provide
mechanIcs or materialmans lien coverage.
NOTE: If the Company cgnduolll the ClWIlers or lean closing under ciro\.lmstances where It Is responsible for
tne recording or filing of legal dOOllmenm from said transaction, the Company will be deemed to have
provided "Gap Coverage",
Pursuant to Senate Bill 91-14 (eRS 10-11-122);
(a) The Subject Real Property may be located in a Special Taxing District;
(b) A Certl1lc:ate ofTaxes Due listing each taxing jurisdiction may be obtained form the County treesUrer of the
County Treasurer's AUthorized Agent;
(c) Infermatlon regarding Special Districts and the bOLlndarles of such dlstri015 may be oblillned from the
Board of County Commissioners, the County CIerI< and Recorder, or the County Assessor.
NOTe: A tax Certificate will be ordered from Ihe County Treasurer by the Com".ny and the costs thereof
Charged to the proposed insured unless written insln.iction to the contrary are received by the company
prior to fhe Issuance of the Title Policy snliclpeled by this Commitment.
This commitment is Invalid \.Inless
the Insuring PrOViSions and Schedules
A and B are attached,
Schedule S-SecQon ~
Commitment No. PCT11369PR
,