The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutLand Use Case.265 Exhibition Ln.A030-012-66 gy ki \91 40Â» G -- 2735-143-16-015 A030-01 HighlandsPUD Amendment- to allowADU ; Lot 5 , Block G. Highlands Pim Â·'F 6445#[0 g.v4pe 0â‚¬3. 5 (Adkjt-b s--7,*009- 3. P U 1 ji - -79 'Doo i COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT 130 South Galena Street Aspen, Colorado 81611 (970) 920-5090 City of Aspen Land Use: 1041 Deposit / 1042 Flat Fee 1043 HPC 1046 Zoning and Sign Referral Fees: 1163 City Engineer 1205 Environmental Health 1190 Housing Building Fees: 1071 Board of Appeals 1072 Building Permit 1073 Electrical Permit 1074 Energy Code Review 1075 Mechanical Permit 1076 Plan Check 1077 Plumbing Permit 1078 Reinspection 1079 Aspen Fire Other Fees: 1006 Copy 1165 Remp Fee 1302 GIS Maps 1303 GIS Fee 1481 Housing Cash in Lieu 1383 Open Space Cash in Lieu 1383 Park Dedication 1468 Parking Cash in Lieu Performance Deposit 1268 Public Right-of-way 1164 School District Land Ded. TOTAL 2 . j tl~ NAME: ..)'~ ~. ~/~' t~ ' , L \Â·J ; ADDRESS/PROJECT: ; , 1 4 PIIONE: 61 1 -1 0 CHECK# , 7< ./ / 1 V '. CASE/PERMIT#: /-1 /9-r../ # OF COPIES: DATF: . -' /0'v . ~,f'--'/ IN'ITIAL: . ~1 .. CASE NUMBER A030-01 PARCEL ID # 2735-143-16015 CASE NAME McCormick Highlands PUD amendment to add ADU PROJECT ADDRESS Lot 15, Block G, Highlands PUD PLANNER James Lindt CASE TYPE PUD Amendment OWNER/APPLICANT John McCormick REPRESENTATIVE DATE OF FINAL ACTION 7/10/01 CITY COUNCIL ACTION PZ ACTION Reso. 31-2001 ADMIN ACTION Approved BOA ACTION DATE CLOSED 8/6/01 BY J. Lindt 0 . PARCEL ID: |2735-143-16015 --DATE RCVD: |3/29/01 # COPIES:~ CASE,PO|A030-01 CASE NAME:~McCormick Highlands PUD amendment to add ADU + Ikd.~04\65~0Â¢\FLN1$1 41(44911.-it,4~ - *. I NA Â£2&2.- 6Â¥11(ier: PROJADDR~Lot 15, Block G, Highlands PUD CASE TYP:~PUD Amendment STEPS1 OWN/APP: John McCormick ADR~302 E. Hopkins C/S/Z: ~Aspen/CO/81611 PHN:|920-4500 REP:1 - ADR:1 C/s/z:i PHNi FEES DUE:~500 D 180 H FEES RCVD:~680 STAT: F REFERRALS~ REF:| BY| DUE: MTG DATE REV BODY PH NOTICED 143Â·Â· .22 DATE OF FINAL ACTION:~ 1 CITY COUNCIL: REMARKS I fi\4/21 iwl E~ u Â£14, *peldeq pz: Â· 14Â» 3/ -2,r I CLOSED:| *Gi~ BY:]~-; L,luck- aorACM. BOA: DRAC: PLAT SUBMITD: ~ PLAT (BK,PG):~ ADMIN: *a,e d .. Notice of Decision Insubstantial Planned Unit Development Amendment John McCormick, owner of a property located at Lot 15, Block G, Highlands PUD, Parcel Identification Number 2735-143-16-015, has applied for administrative approval of an Insubstantial Amendment to the Aspen Highlands PUD to amend the approved building envelope as is shown on Exhibit B and to utilize the more accurate ground survey as accepted grade on this lot, as is shown on Exhibit D. The Community Development Director shall approve, approve with conditions, or deny a land use application for an insubstantial PUD amendment pursuant to Sections 26.445.100 (A) and 26.304 of the Aspen Municipal Code if an application is found to be consistent with the following review criteria: 1. The proposed amendment to the Aspen Highlands Planned Unit Development meets the criteria of Section 26.445.100 (A), PUD Insubstantial Amendments. COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DIRECTOR DECISION The Community Development Director finds that the proposed amendment to the Aspen Ilighlands PUD to be consistent with the review criteria, and hereby approves the insubstantial PUD amendment on this -76_day of -3Li~ ,2001. /Mie Ann Woods, Community Development Director APPROVED JUL 9> .007 COMMUNITY DEvt.w, ..c.,I Uitit:Cll>H EXHIBITS - CITY OFASPEN Exhibit A: Insubstantial PUD Amendment Checklist Exhibit B: Application & Amended Building Envelope Exhibit C: Letter from Owner ofNeighboring Lot 16, Block G, Aspen Highlands Village Exhibit D: Request to Use Ground Survey & Ground Survey .... EXHIBIT A Case No. A030-01 Parcel ID No. 2735-143-16-015 Zone District R-15 PUD Reviewed By James Lindt Date 6/18/01 Insubstantial PUD Amendment Checklist 26. 445.100 Review Criteria All insubstantial PUD Amendments shall meet the following criteria, pursuant to Section ~26.445.100, Amendment to PUD Development Order: The proposed amendment does not change the use or character of the development. S~ The proposed amendment does not increase by greater than three (3) percent the overall coverage of structures on the land. 6<~ The proposed amendment does not substantially increases trip generation rates of the proposed development, or the demand for public facilities. [4~ The proposed amendment does not decrease the approved open space by greater than three (3) percent. 4- The proposed amendment does not reduce the off street parking and loading space by greater than one (1) percent. 61/~ The proposed amendment does not reduce required pavement widths or rights-of- way for streets and easements. CE~ The proposed amendment does not increase the approved gross leasable floor area of commercial building by greater than two (2) percent. [E~ The proposed amendment does not increase the approved residential density of the development by greater than one (1) percent. G~ The proposed amendment will not enact a change which is inconsistent with a condition or representation of the project' s original approval or which requires granting a variation from the project' s approved use or dimensional requirements. .... April 16,2001 Julie Ann Woods Community Development Director City ofAspen 130 South Galena Street Aspen, CO 81611 Dear Julie Ann, Thank you for meeting with John McCormick, Charles Cunniffe, Matt Stokes, James Lindt, and lIli LI me on March 30 to review the discrepancy in aerial and ground surveys on Maroon Neighborhood Lot 15 at Aspen Highlands Village. flip{n Per your recommendation, I am forwarding you a survey that illustrates the contours as depicted in Aspen Highlands Village PUD reference drawing L-204 generated by aerial survey and the HIGILII[IDS contours as depicted by a recent ground survey. It is typical that aerial surveys may have a margin of error of approximately 2-4 feet, and that ground surveys more accurately depict the land's topography. In fact, we find this to be true in this case. VILLAGE Please accept this letter as a formal request for your approval to use of the more accurate ground survey contours (in red) as the base line for building height measurement rather than the aerial survey (in yellow) for the home designed for this lot. RO Box 5115 Aspen, Colorado Thank you for your attention to this matter. Please feel free to contact me with any questions or concerns. 81612 Sincerely, (970) 920-1710 Fax (970) 920-3955 David Norden CC: John McCormick, Charles Cunniffe 1 9 -,1 -1 3 .. lib 1 .. i r.1 f ,- 6 8 4 0 1 1/ C f j <ti WWWCUNNIFFE. COF 4 2 1 1 #23*gr o>\ A ..' ). m --p r 1' co I / 2 - ENVELOPE â€¢ Â· . \Acriv TY .. \ '~ ~ 1+'I i 7. 7 * $ 1- a 6- .... /,Rk< N Â· Â· Z 1 1 iNN i S \ 111 \4 9:,%--k- _15&_~-s LII \\\ - \392â‚¬ 14 + R 5 I 1 \ 1 hkvj t~ 4>C ~ - I , A"#62*i& M i \ \NI -\ 49 - <| / iRENCH *fAIN 06 / ~0 \ 64 \ N 1\1 U \ il I ' 1 1 -- ..1 ra 4 L 11.M \/1 '492. -I \\ 12 558 Â·. 1 4 0 7 -/ fil a â‚¬ e , cO, AP~N t- ... . Se ST \ ''ll #W ,% R + 2 . 2.I* Za 33 Â»,>."u"+ 1 1 - 1. . ..1 / -2 - ,+MN, - - 1 1 1 -0- Ill 21Â«Â« - j I.1 E ZEF' O 9*w" 4: . -1-1./ If ~~' ~ l~ 2 31 6 N21 1; 1 4 '40 "W \2 1 CLIFFS W MAROON , \ \9 1 . 1 11 , 62~4 -3 - 1 EL:kll.te=~ 1 1 - ;-l L lili Vi 0 37===9 -*k- 1 rl A-E C 'E o , 4 ' 1,1- -- \ \1, 1 1 622 93 , ILM.'!r - -- M - -1-1 'It.H I 3%\E- \ 3 P L - 11 0 4 8 Â· --Â·I wt-1 LIÂ· rH-w-- Â·. 7-104.1'HPI--7- . 0 z g i 0 r 3:Â»J r 1 -5 N Ma-:2 r- *2 1.- %2 T 1 4.4 * 1.9 0 -1 P 11~>17 1 /\ U 0 , 1 W 7/7 .50:2Â¥, 1 / #A \ O , , 01,2 f-\\C 0 1 3-23 1, /1 4 1434 \ 1 ,\1 0 \ t/ 3% f \ 64 SITE & GRADING MAN / aKEVA \ X \. 4 . 1, 1. BUILDING REFERENCE ELEVATION 100'-O. 2. SITE PLAN INFORMATION MAS PROVIDED 4 EQUALS SITE TOPOGRAPHY ELEVATION &162 / \.F /\ ti 6:TO. u \ BÂ¥ A CERTIFIED SURVEY PREPARED BY SS M. 0101 DATED 05-XX-'01. 06-22-2001 h- 4 -84 4% ==- 3. THIS SITE AND GRAPINS PLAN IS BASED ON SITE SURVEY (SHEET ALI/e) ~ SHEET NO. 4. WILDING SITE COVERAGE OF THE LOT 15 36.4%. MA n \ A~H ~ t ro $ 9 Â«042 SITE 4 6RADING PLAN â‚¬;06<17'\ A1.2 4 6 54 rt 1/8. â€¢ 1.-O. . SHEET OF D.ri./.O- .-./'ll/'.. UWIFTiiE*in Jun. 20, 2001 12 27: 07 Â£95t-0Z40Â£6 :râ€¢' . 0655-5260Â£6 3111 . IWLe 03 'NkiN . SZ59-9Z6'DZ6 ~)(V; . 0659-9/ Â£6 :n31 . 5[,IR Oj'SO*MCH 50to Â£956-@ZeDÂ£6 XÂ¥3 . WELE-9 DMV 3331NNAD 9 33NBGIS321 131INMOD UNROD N I / / / / ff...9 / 1/ il f 1/ 1 /47 1 ! / // , // 1/ / // , / i Ill / 1 i if 1/ I //7/ ,</\ 1 1 1 /1 r 1/ - -/ I / 1 1 03 1 / / ./7,/ / // / 6 // 1 \1 / :/ f / 1 / 1 / 1 ./~/ 1/ . 3 1 1 1 i, 1/ 1 10: - 1./1 /1/ j rE T C rt rM '11 / i l j .1 1 L/0 7 \ i /-.-\ 1 / Lif1- // 1 / 1 ./.74// / 111 y 41 1 \ l j ' 1 1 , \ 1 1 1 / /r //2 // , , / i t~1 /1/1 i / / / / / / / /11 1/1/1 -11~ 1 1 i / 1\ 1 \1 / ,\ / i \ / , \ 1 /R ///i./iA A T- ' -- - - AR WCAP J ,-* ---~~~~ --~~r- 1 / / 20 *3, - - 11 ifil i / / 1 ///1/ \\\ El c PIr . BENICH EL- 8157.22 / / / j /' \/ \ / 1 1 1 / / / / i J. 1 1 1 / Ill \ , i / 1 4/ \ / 1 1 1 EiRCIR\C 1 /It \ 0 1 / V '/ /// 1 1 / 1 ./ \ l.' 1 1 1 1 1 / / 1 4 4/1 , f 1 1\1 / f / i / I 1\ / r UND ROUN f L - 1/1 //// \\\ ~ S -~SIGN Â·/ ~ ~ - --- , / Â£\ / I. I 1 ' F#WSHED / GRADING OKP.2 1 /~ / f SCALE: 1 " g/'Tb' 0 / / 14. 1 6/ ' 1 / 7 \ L - i , ' 1 1 i I , \ 1 / ~' (AS SH~WN ON AHV CD'S AND L-1204) i / / Â® SEWER / i' 9 11 / 2\ 1 MANHOLE 1 LOT '' 4 / / , / i --3 1 , , / / ./ /// i 1 1 4/ AS-CONSTRUCTED)- TOE OF SLOPE (EXISTING, l 1 i / I ,/ / .Â·EDGE OF ' ' , ' ''- 6 / 1 / 1 6 / PAVEMENT 1 1 1 1 fi jr \ / \ 11 \\ 1 / TOE OF SLOPE (DESIGN, AS ' . . I / f, / . f HOWN ON CD'S AND L-2~4) ~ ' f i 1 1 / 1 1 1 30 / , / , , / / / / / 47 /' EN OPE - , TER / , /// . / / , .. VALVE , 4, 4 - , 1 1 . / 102'Wff 64, -/ / /0 */ / i / i ./7 / , , A /h. / / 6 O' D INA / , 1 , /7 ./ I / :// / - lu . 2 1 / 1 .7 L/Ol , EAS ENT /, / - -K . I , 1 - l / 4 / 9 0--0 1 , 1 / / - --- It ~ ' ~ v IRE / 0163 // / / 1\ / I '. i t ,\/ 0 1 .6 HYDRANT 1 /1 / / 1 f/693 - 00- - 1 -i-- - ' 1 }i \ / - \ 1 ELECT / r / ts #8 3 A. / 451 , / - ' / / (POMMON- - i / ~ SER)/ICEu~ 4 1 1 71---11 -------1 /////// , 1 , E---7= 101 / DR / 1 ~, / Affk- 91; 1-~ --- _L 1 / ECTRI //e>////./,/, , / , e Â· 2 ~ E / - --Â»<438; -1-cks ~ / / i [R!.1 / / 1 3--tv'' 1 / 1 / / - UTILITY EASEMEN-01 /./ / .484 AC:kf .t \ i ' 1 1 ' i *-14 // // /// // 1 lili , ---- 12/ , - ELECT C -16% 1/ , J! , / M 1/%1 I 1 //44 / 1 ~/1 TRAN RMER .. , 1 i I .\ I J i.// ~ 27 .V.C.'b - ~ i' //--- /1- - j , , / //// i fi / / M ''/- 1 '' â‚¬36/ / // ./ /1 ./ ./ ./ f , 1 'f // 1 2 pvc 9, A , ,. , $ / / .. *3 OVER 8162 ~- 51/16 SEC. 1 T. 10 S., R. / / / ; 1 ,/ 1.. , USDA ALUMINU CAP, ~ / Â· i / 4, ./ / / FOUND // ,Â·~ , 1 , ,/ j - I ./ 1//'' 1 ' I / i 1 . / ,- . / .' I / / 4~ 1 , , I 2 . / 0 / . - - \ 40 ... / , , .: 4, / / / / 1 / r i & f. - 1 ././.1 I / / , / / i / / / ./ / t. 1 .' ..IIi. ' / I./ / / . . / / / / / / I Â· 1 1 / f J ' I f EXI*ING ONTOUR ( P.) ' ' 1. / / ' / / /7 i/ 1 001vION 4 ,/4,/ , / /-7 //// / /REA 50 l f / ' ; , , / i / 3 ' ' Â® 1 1 1 1 / ' i /1/ Cd / 1// /1 / //03: / ; t \ / A? 4Vf , // / 2/1 i i , 4 /1 i ill'11 f , 1 / 1 1/ , , ,/ i ' 1 *lA ~ / , 1/ '' / It 1, //, ./ I. 1. , i P . -EX/STING CO TOUR Â£ A , 1 / / / 1~ 1 1 7 EAS ENT / 1 , ' j 1 1 (A /AL JOPO - SHED) ; 1 . / I .. / I / / / / // ///i/// / / i / / 1 / ' ROCK +LL + 1 . / 1 ./ / . 1 i '\1 / / 4 .l\ 1 1 1 11 1 ' / ~5 2 8' DIA. BUSH ~ / \ 1 / /,Ill , 7 , , , , , , i , 1 , 1 1 1 III / A , 1 \ i ' / 1 1 i 1\ 1 . 1 f \\1 1 1 1 // / / , /1/ 3 1 3// A \\,/ , / / 9 1 / , c . ./:/ 1 . / I , 1 / // 1 1 1/ 1/// 3/ 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 / 1 - t."'ll \ lili \(///;,i f - i , r / lili / \ \ 1 1 '* i -i-4 .i''lilil //// 1 \ 1 1 / 1 i, \ ll1l 0 / \ \ , , 1 . ///c 1 1 1 1 \ i, ; ; \\ -2 7 1 < E C~RIC ~ f./ i / 1 1 1 .1 1 1 d J Â· f 1 111 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 . I / , \ \ \ 11\ / i f 1 1 1, 1 1 lli 4 / , , lilli RC' 571 5/~4 ,' j 1/ 1/ 1/ /1 /1 //'.1/'./ C ,//3. -'// ///1/ f 1 \ \ P..C..4 It 1/ 1 1 \ / ' 1 f 1 ' /111111 1 1 I i .// I / 41 , /// ,/ // 1111 lll 1 1 1 i - - 3 /0 ~ LECT Ci / i / / ND GR / / r/AS 1/' / j / f lilil 1 1 /LOT 14/ 1 / t' 11 1 1 94. 1 / 1 , 11/1 lili ' lill'/1 \ 1 I 1 1/1/ lili 1 81 1 1 1ll 1 1 1// 1 1 i / 1 1 i Iii i \ 7 %3 3 /0> //1 /1 I'll'11 1 1 /'. 11\ 1 1 Lqi 131 1 1 1 \ GAS 1. 11 , \ I / ./: 1 i 1 il i v / 4 / e. 1 It lt 1 4 l/ll'l 1 1 - A v-. 6 9;*,7 0*-loors / , : ,#00Â£$ i / O 1 1 1/ 1 Iii ilj / 1 1 0 i / 1 /0 1\\ li j ij I i' 1 1 ill i \ \ \ / 2 \\ 4 1 k 1, 1\ / 1 1 1 / / / r lil \\ i ,\ i \\ 1 I I / /r / / 1 1 1 1 1 1 lili 1 1 1 \ 1 r= i a: O,J YJL (L, 74) / //4 11 1 1. 11 1 / 1 / i AP 0 NUM- BY Job No. 92184I-I REVISION DATE Notice: SCWMUESER GORDON MEYER BER cAtrn;32etriÂ°tr(~Â°al;Ch 131eiuupon any 0 0 LOT 15 Drawn by: DJC defect in this survey within three years after 11'~. 61~STREET, SUITE 200 may any legal action based upon any defect TOPOGRAPHY OVERLAY you first discover such defect. In no event GLENWOOD SPRINGS, COLORADO 8160 I ASPEN HIGHLANDS VILLAGE Date: 2/16/01 6 in this survey be commenced more than ten (970) 945- 1004 FAX (970) 945-5948 OF years from the date of the certification shown SCHMUESER | GORDON | MEYER ASPEN, COLORADO (970) 925-6727 MAROON NEIGHBORHOOD Fle 92184I-LLOT15 hereon. Approved: ~ ENGINEERS & SURVEYORS E-mail: surve/@sgm-inc.com \ I \:,\ ~-/\' C\\14 A A \%*, 1:\1992\921841\921841-Lrot15.dwg Saved: Fri 16 Feb 2001 8:50am Plotted: Fri, 16 Feb 2001 8:54om dcokiey *ONI PIDS OODZ LHOINAdOO . 0 Notice of Decision Insubstantial Planned Unit Development Amendment John McCormick, owner of a property located at Lot 15, Block G, Highlands PUD, Parcel Identification Number 2735-143-16-015, has applied for administrative approval of an Insubstantial Amendment to the Aspen Highlands PUD to utilize the more accurate ground survey dated August 30, 2001 as the accepted grade on this lot, as is shown on Exhibit B. This amends an earlier approval in which a survey dated May 30, 2001 was approved as accepted grade. The Community Development Director shall approve, approve with conditions, or deny a land use application for an insubstantial PUD amendment pursuant to Sections 26.445.100 (A) and 26.304 of the Aspen Municipal Code if an application is found to be consistent with the following review criteria: 1. The proposed amendment to the Aspen Highlands Planned Unit Development meets the criteria of Section 26.445.100 (A), PUD Insubstantial Amendments. COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DIRECTOR DECISION The Community Development Director finds that the proposed amendment to the Aspen Highlands PUD to be consistent with the review criteria, and hereby approves the insubstantial PUD amendment on this /4 '- day of * 14Â£2-Â©. , , 2001. ) 0,Â» At-hy- "V / lillie Ann Woods, Community Development Director 0/r EXHIBITS Exhibit A: Insubstantial PUD Amendment Checklist Exhibit B: Ground Survey Dated August 30,2001 43 7- 0 00 Hp i tÂ«32 IN-~ g I- U- 8=214-e~-r- MEMORANDUM -2 c f 1 /k\ TO: Aspen Planning and Zoning Commission Â©+CAL THRU: Julie Ann Woods, Community Development Directo- Joyce Ohlson, Deputy DirectoldAD .- i cr7Â»Â·-~k.....1 FROM: James Lindt, Acting Zoning Officer 3-4 1.Â« n_1Â·fr-Â·Â·rl~7~. Cf\ t...n--Â·3. RE: Aspen Highlands Village PUD Amendment - Public Hearing 9091 \ C DATE: July 10, 2001 .- / 1 4.~ .4 C Ul 4<-641 APPLICANT /OWNER: defuj John McCormick CIL REPRESENTATIVE: Jim Guffey, Charles Cunniffe Architects LOCATION: 0265 Exhibition Lane, Lot 15, Block G, Aspen Highlands Village Planned Unit Development CURRENT ZONING: R-15 PUD CURRENT LAND USE: Vacant Lot PROPOSED LAND USE REQUEST: Amendment to the Planned Unit Development SUMMARY: Applicant wishes to obtain an amendment to the Aspen Highlands Village Planned Unit Development (PUD) for the purpose of constructing an Accessory Dwelling Unit (ADU) in the Aspen Highlands Village Planned Unit Development. The approved PUD only allows for ten ADU's to be constructed on lots in which the property owners were conveyed certificates for these Caretaker Units from Hines Highlands Limited Partnership. This would be the eleventh ADU in the Planned Unit Development. REVIEW PROCEDURE An amendment found to be consistent with or an enhancement of the approved final development plan by the Community Development Director, but which does not meet the established thresholds for an insubstantial amendment, may be approved, approved with conditions, or denied by the Planning and Zoning Commission, at a public hearing pursuant to Section 26.445.030(C) Step 3. The action by the Planning and Zoning Commission shall be considered the final action, unless the decision is appealed to City Council. .. STAFF COMMENTS: The applicant, John McCormick, represented by Charles Cuniffe Architects, requests an amendment to the Aspen Highlands Village Planned Unit Development (PUD) for the purpose of constructing an eleventh ADU within the PUD. Ten ADU's were originally approved to be constructed within the PUD. The lots that were allowed to receive the ADU's were established by Hines Highlands Limited Partnership through a certificate program. Hines received certificates from the County to construct the ten ADU' s within the PUD, and then Hines was able to convey the certificates to the property owners in the PUD as they saw fit. Hines claims that there was no monetary payment received by them for the certificates and that they were conveyed on a first come, first serve basis. The applicant is asking for an amendment to allow for an ADU to be constructed on his single- family lot at Highlands. The applicant was unable to obtain one of the ten ADU Certificates, but has received a letter from Hines Highlands Inc. (Exhibit E) authorizing him to apply for the PUD Amendment to allow for the ADU. Allowing for more ADU's at Highlands is supported by many of the Housing goals and policies set forth in the Aspen Area Community Plan. More specifically, allowing ADU' s on the single-family lots would "encourage development to occur within the Aspen Community Growth Boundary" and would also "encourage greater participation by the private sector in affordable housing". Staff feels that allowing for more ADU's would also further the Aspen Area Community Plan Housing Policy that calls for the City to "celebrate our diversity by reflecting it in our housing inventory" and to "avoid housing developments that inadvertently create segregation". Staff feels that the Highlands PUD should be amended to allow for the City's ADU program to be implemented, allowing for voluntary ADU's to be approved at an administrative level on all single-family lots in the PUD. However, staff can not initiate a PUD amendment to allow for City's ADU program to be implemented without Hines' authorization. Staff has been unable to obtain this authorization at the current time. Staff believes that the impacts of the PUD Amendment to allow for an additional ADU to be built on the applicant' s lot would be very minor. An off-street parking space is required per the Highlands PUD Guidelines, which would prevent the additional resident from parking on the street. Staff recommends approval of the proposed amendment to the Aspen Highlands Village Planned Unit Development (PUD) for the purpose of allowing for an ADU to be built on Lot 15, Block G of the Highlands PUD. The PUD Amendment would allow for Mr. McCormick to construct an ADU within the dimensional requirements set out in the Highlands Village PUD and allow for the ADU to be constructed per the City' s ADU design guidelines pursuant to section 26.520 of the City Land Use Code. 2 .. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the Planning and Zoning Commission approve the Amendment to the Aspen Highlands Village Planned Unit Development (PUD) for the purpose of allowing an eleventh ADU to be constructed pursuant to Section 26.520 of the Land Use Code, on Lot 15, Block G, Aspen Highlands Village PUD. RECOMMENDED MOTION (ALL MOTIONS ARE PROPOSED IN THE AFFIRMATIVE): "I move to approve Resolution No~ Series of 2001, approving the Amendment to the Aspen Highlands Village Planned Unit Development (PUD) for the purpose of allowing for an eleventh ADU to be constructed pursuant to Land Use Code Section 26.520, on Lot 15, Block G, of the Aspen Highlands Village PUD." ATTACHMENTS: Exhibit A -- Review Criteria and Staff Findings Exhibit B -- Parcel Location Exhibit C -- Development Application Exhibit D -- Letter from Hines Authorizing and Supporting the Application 3 .. RESOLUTION NO. -~| (SERIES OF 2001) A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF ASPEN PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION APPROVING AN AMENDMENT TO THE ASPEN HIGHLANDS VILLAGE PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT TO ALLOW FOR AN ACCESSORY DWELLING UNIT TO BE CONSTRUCTED PURSUANT TO LAND USE CODE SECTION 26.520.050, ADU DESIGN STANDARDS, ON LOT 15, BLOCK G, OF THE ASPEN HIGHLANDS VILLAGE PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT, CITY OF ASPEN, PITKIN COUNTY, COLORADO. WHEREAS, the Community Development Department received an application from John McCormick, represented by Charles Cunnife Architects, for an amendment to the Aspen Highlands Village Planned Unit Development (PUD) to allow for an eleventh Accessory Dwelling Unit to be constructed within the Highlands Village Planned Unit Development on Lot 15, Block G, Aspen Highlands Village PUD; and, WHEREAS, pursuant to Sections 26.445, the Planning and Zoning Commission may approve an amendment to an approved Planned Unit Development, during a duly noticed public hearing, comments from the general public, a recommendation from the Community Development Staff, and recommendations from relevant referral agencies; WHEREAS, the Community Development Department reviewed the request for an amendment to the Aspen Highlands Village PUD to allow for an additional ADU to be allowed solely on Lot 15, Block G, Aspen Highlands PUD and recommended Approval; and, WHEREAS, the Aspen Planning and Zoning Commission has reviewed and considered the development proposal under the applicable provisions of the Municipal Code as identified herein, has reviewed and considered the recommendation of the Community Development Department, the applicable referral agencies, and has taken and considered public comment at a public hearing; and, WHEREAS, the Aspen Planning and Zoning Commission finds that the development proposal meets or exceeds all applicable development standards and that the approval of the development proposal, with conditions, is consistent with the goals and elements of the Aspen Area Community Plan; and, WHEREAS, the Aspen Planning and Zoning Commission finds that this Resolution furthers and is necessary for the promotion of public health, safety, and welfare. WHEREAS, during a duly noticed public hearing on July 10, 2001, the Planning and Zoning Commission approved, by a 1 to 32- (-7 - C) vote, an amendment to the Aspen Highlands Village Planned Unit Development (PUD) for the purpose of allowing an eleventh ADU to be constructed, pursuant to the land use code section 26.520.050, ADU Design Standards, on Lot 15, Block G, Aspen Highlands Village Planned Unit Development; and, 12 .. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY OF ASPEN PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION as follows: Section 1 Pursuant to the procedures and standards set forth in Title 26 of the Aspen Municipal Code, the amendment to the Aspen Highlands Village Planned Unit Development (PUD) for the purpose of allowing an eleventh Accessory Dwelling Unit to be constructed within the PUD on Lot 15, Block G, is approved with the following conditions: 1. The Accessory Dwelling Unit shall conform to the regulations set out in section 26.050, ADU design standards. 2. All applicants for an ADU shall prepare and record the appropriate deed restriction for the unit in conjunction with the Aspen/Pitkin Housing Authority. Section 2: This Resolution shall not effect any existing litigation and shall not operate as an abatement of any action or proceeding now pending under or by virtue of the ordinances repealed or amended as herein provided, and the same shall be conducted and concluded under such prior ordinances. Section 3: If any section, subsection, sentence, clause, phrase, or portion of this Resolution is for any reason held invalid or unconstitutional in a court of competent jurisdiction, such portion shall be deemed a separate, distinct and independent provision and shall not affect the validity of the remaining portions thereof. Approved by the Commission at its regular meeting on July 10,2001. APPROVED AS TO FORM: PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION: City Attorney Robert Blaich, Chair ATTEST: Jackie Lothian, Deputy City Clerk 13 0.0 EXHIBIT A HIGHLANDS PUD AMENDMENT REVIEW CRITERIA & STAFF FINDINGS A. General requirements. 1. The proposed development shall be consistent with the Aspen Area Community Plan. 2. The proposed development shaH be consistent with the character of existing land uses in the surrounding area. 3. The proposed development shall not adversely affect the future development Of the surrounding area. 4. The proposed development has either been granted GMQS allotments, is exempt from GMQS, or GMQS allotments are available to accommodate the proposed development and will be considered prior to, or in combination with, final PUD development plan review. Staff Finding Staff finds that the proposed PUD Amendment is consistent with the AACP and the existing land uses in the surrounding areas in that there are already ADU's that are approved within the PUD. Staff finds that the proposed amendment furthers the AACP goal of providing more employee housing within the limits of the Urban Growth Boundary. Staff finds the criterion to be met. B. Establishment of Dimensional Requirements: The final PUD development plans shall establish the dimensional requirements for all properties within the PUD as described in General Provisions, Section 26.445.040, above. The dimensional requirements of the underlying zone district shall be used as a guide in determining the appropriate dimensions for the PUD. During review of the proposed dimensional requirements, compatibility with surrounding land uses and existing development patterns shall be emphasized. The proposed dimensional requirements shall comply with the following: 1. The proposed dimensional requirements for the subject property are appropriate and compatible with the following influences on the property: a) The character of, and compatibility with, existing and expectedfuture land uses in the surrounding area. b) Natural or man-made hazards. 4 .. c) Existing natural characteristics of the property and surrounding area such as steep slopes, waterways, shade, and significant vegetation and landforms. d) Existing and proposed man-made characteristics Of the property and the surrounding area such as noise, traffic, transit, pedestrian circulation, parking, and historical resources. Staff Finding The approved types of land uses will not be changed. Accessory Dwelling Units are already allowed within the PUD to a limited number. Staff feels that the additional traffic and demand for transit will be minimal. Staff finds this criterion to be met. 2. The proposed dimensional requirements permit a scale, massing, and quantity of open space and site coverage appropriate andfavorable to the character of the proposed PUD and of the surrounding area. Staff Finding Staff finds that the proposed amendment will not reduce the open space nor increase the site coverage. Detached ADU' s are not allowed on Block G per the Highlands Village PUD. Staff finds this criterion to be met. 3. The appropriate number of off-street parking spaces shall be established based on the following considerations: a) The probable number of cars used by those using the proposed development including any non-residential land uses. b) The varying time periods of use, whenever joint use of common parking is proposed. c) The availability of public transit and other transportationfacilities, including those for pedestrian access and/or the commitment to utilize automobile disincentive techniques in the proposed development. d) The proximity of the proposed development to the commercial core and general activity centers in the city. Staff Finding Staff finds that parking demand will be met because the ADU design standards require that one off-street parking space be created and designated for the ADU resident in addition to the parking for the primary residences. There are also RFTA bus stops nearby to provide alternative forms of transportation. Staff finds this criterion to be met. 4. The maximum allowable density within a PUD may be reduced if there exists insufficient infrastructure capabilities. Specifically, the maximum density of a PUD may be reduced if: 5 .. a) There is not sujficient water pressure, drainage capabilities, or other utilities to service the proposed development. b) There are not adequate roads to ensure jire protection, snow removal, and road maintenance to the proposed development. Staff Finding Staff finds this criterion does not apply to this application. 5. The maximum allowable density within a PUD may be reduced if there exists natural hazards or critical natural site features. Specifically, the maximum density of a PUD may be reduced if: a) The landis not suitable for the proposed development because of ground instability or the possibility of mudflow, rockfalls or avalanche dangers. b) The effects of the proposed development are detrimental to the natural watershed, due to runoff, drainage, soil erosion, and consequent water pollution. c) The proposed development will have a pernicious effect on air quality in the surrounding area and the City. d) The design and location of any proposed structure, road, driveway, or trail in the proposed development is not compatible with the terrain or causes harmful disturbance to critical natural features of the site. Staff Finding Staff finds this criterion does not apply to this application. 6. The maximum allowable density within a PUD may be increased if there exists a significant community goal to be achieved through such increase and the development pattern is compatible with its surrounding development patterns and with the site's physical constraints. Specifically, the maximum density of a PUD may be increased if: a) The increase in density serves one or more goals of the community as expressed in the Aspen Area Community Plan (AACP) or a specijic area plan to which the property is subject. b) The site's physical capabilities can accommodate additional density and there exists no negative physical characteristics of the site, as identified in subparagraphs 4 and 5, above, those areas can be avoided, or those characteristics mitigated. c) The increase in maximum density results in a development pattern compatible with, and complimentary to, the surrounding existing and expected development pattern, land uses, and characteristics. 6 .. Staff Finding Accessory Dwelling Units are not counted as units of density per the land use code. Staff finds that ADU's are encouraged by the Aspen Area Community Plan and that affordable housing units constructed within the Urban Growth Boundary are compatible with the surrounding land uses. Staff finds this criterion to be met. C. Site Design. The purpose of this standard is to ensure the PUD enhances public spaces, is complimentary to the site's natural and man-made features and the adjacent public spaces, and ensures the public's health and safety. The proposed development shall comply with the following: 1. Existing natural or man-made features of the site which are unique, provide visual interest or a specific reference to the past, or contribute to the identity of the town are preserved or enhanced in an appropriate manner. 2. Structures have been clustered to appropriately preserve significant open spaces and vistas. 3. Structures are appropriately oriented to public streets, contribute to the urban or rural context where appropriate, and provide visual interest and engagement of vehicular and pedestrian movement. 4. Buildings and access ways are appropriately arranged to allow emergency and service vehicle access. 5. Adequate pedestrian and handicapped access is provided. 6. Site drainage is accommodated for the proposed development in a practical and reasonable manner and shall not negatively impact surrounding properties. 7. For non-residential land uses, spaces between buildings are appropriately designed to accommodate any programmatic functions associated with the use. Staff Finding Staff finds that the proposed amendment will not affect the open space or setbacks because there is an approved building envelope already in place on the lot. The ADU will also be located within the dimensional requirements of the approved Aspen Highlands Village PUD. 7 D. Landscape Plan. The purpose ofthis standard is to ensure compatibility of the proposed landscape with the visual character of the city, with surrounding parcels, and with existing and proposedfeatures of the subject property. The proposed development shall comply with the following: 1. The landscape plan exhibits a well-designated treatment of exterior spaces, preserves existing significant vegetation, and provides an ample quantity and variety of ornamental plant species suitable for the Aspen area climate. 2. Significant existing natural and man-made site features, which provide uniqueness and interest in the landscape, are preserved or enhanced in an appropriate manner. 3. The proposed method Of protecting existing vegetation and other landscape features is appropriate. Staff Finding Staff finds that this criterion does not apply to this application. E. Architectural Character. It is the purpose of this standard is to encourage architectural interest, variety, character, and visual identity in the proposed development and within the City while promoting efficient use of resources. Architectural character is based upon the suitability of a building for its purposes, legibility of the building's use, the building's proposed massing, proportion, scale, orientation to public spaces and other buildings, use of materials, and other attributes, which may significantly represent the character of the proposed development. There shall be approved as part of the final development plan an architectural character plan, which adequately depicts the character of the proposed development. The proposed architecture of the development shall: 1. Be compatible with or enhance the visual character of the city, appropriately relate to existing and proposed architecture of the property, represent a character suitable for, and indicative Of, the intended use, and respect the scale and massing of nearby historical and cultural resources. 2. Incorporate, to the extent practical, natural heating and cooling by taking advantage of the property's solar access, shade, and vegetation and by use of non- or less-intensive mechanical systems. 3. Accommodate the storage and shedding of snow, ice, and water in a safe and appropriate manner that does not require significant maintenance. 8 .. Staff Finding Staff finds that the proposed amendment does not change the architectural character of the residence. Staff finds this criterion to be met. F. Lighting. The purpose of this standard is to ensure the exterior of the development will be lighted in an appropriate manner considering both public safety and general aesthetic concerns. The following standards shaN be accomplished: 1. AH lighting is proposed so as to prevent direct glare or hazardous interference of any kind to adjoining streets or lands. Lighting of site features, structures, and access ways is proposed in an appropriate manner. 2. AH exterior lighting shall be in compliance with the Outdoor Lighting Standards unless otherwise approved and noted in the final PUD documents. Up lighting of site features, buildings, landscape elements, and lighting to call inordinate attention to the properly is prohibited for residential development. Staff Finding The applicant must meet the outdoor lighting requirements set forth in the Highlands Village PUD. Staff finds that this criterion is not applicable to this application. G. Common Park, Open Space, or Recreation Area. U the proposed development includes a common park, open space, or recreation area for the mutual benefit of all development in the proposed PUD, the following criteria shall be met: 3. The proposed amount, location, and design of the common park, open space, or recreation area enhances the character of the proposed development, considering existing and proposed structures and natural landscape features of the property, provides visual relief to the property's builtform, and is available to the mutual benefit of the various land uses and property users of the PUD. 4. A proportionate, undivided interest in all common park and recreation areas is deeded in perpetuity (notfor a number of years) to each lot or dwelling unit owner within the PUD or ownership is proposed in a similar manner. 5. There is proposed an adequate assurance through a legal instrumentfor the permanent care and maintenance of open spaces, recreation areas, and shared facilities together with a deed restriction againstfuture residential, commercial, or industrial development. 9 .. Staff Finding Staff finds this criterion does not apply to this application. H. Utilities and Public facilities. The purpose of this standard is to ensure the development does not impose an undue burden on the City's infrastructure capabilities and that the public does not incur an unjustified Jinancial burden. The proposed utilities and public facilities associated with the development shall comply with the following: 1. Adequate public infrastructure facilities exist to accommodate the development. 2. Adverse impacts on public infrastructure by the development will be mitigated by the necessary improvements at the sole cost Of the developer. 3. Oversized utilities, public facilities, or site improvements are provided appropriately and where the developer is reimbursed proportionately for the additional improvement. Staff Finding Staff finds that adequate public infrastructure exists to serve the additional unit that would be created by this amendment. Staff finds this criterion to be met. I. Access and Circulation. (Only standards 1&2 apply to Minor PUD applications) The purpose of this standard is to ensure the development is easily accessible, does not unduly burden the surrounding road network, provides adequate pedestrian and recreational trailfacilities and minimizes the use of security gates. The proposed access and circulation of the development shall meet the following criteria: 1. Each lot, structure, or other land use within the PUD has adequate access to a public street either directly or through an approved private road, a pedestrian way, or other area dedicated to public or private use. 2. The proposed development, vehicular access points, and parking arrangement do not create traffic congestion on the roads surrounding the proposed development, or such surrounding roads are proposed to be improved to accommodate the development. 3. Areas of historic pedestrian or recreational trail use, improvements of, or connections to, the bicycle and pedestrian trail system, and adequate access to significant public lands and the rivers are provided through dedicated public trail easements and are proposed for appropriate improvements and maintenance. 4. The recommendations of the Aspen Area Community Plan and adopted specific plans regarding recreational trails, pedestrian and bicycle 10 .. paths, and transportation are proposed to be implemented in an appropriate manner. 5. Streets in the PUD which are proposed or recommended to be retained under private ownership provide appropriate dedication to public use to ensure appropriate public and emergency access. 6. Security gates, guard posts, or other entryway expressions for the PUD, or for lots within the PUD, are minimized to the extent practical. Staff Finding Staff finds that the proposed amendment does not affect the vehicular circulation because an off-street parking space is required for each ADU unit. Staff finds this criterion to be met. J. Phasing of Development Plan. (does not apply to Conceptual PUD applications) The purpose of this criteria is to ensure partially completed projects do not create an unnecessary burden on the public or surrounding property owners and impacts of an individual phase are mitigated adequately. If phasing ofthe development plan is proposed, each phase shall be defined in the adopted,final PUD development plan. The phasing plan shall comply with the following: 1. Al[ phases, including the initialphase, shaN be designed to function as a complete development and shall not be reliant on subsequent phases. 2. The phasing plan describes physical areas insulating, to the extent practical, occupants of initial phases from the construction of later phases. 3. The proposed phasing plan ensures the necessary or proportionate improvements to public facilities, payment of impact fees and fees-in- lieu, construction of any facilities to be used jointly by residents of the PUD, construction of any required affordable housing, and any mitigation measures are realized concurrent or prior to the respective impacts associated with the phase. Staff Finding Staff finds this criterion does not apply to this application. 11 0265 Exhi bition Lane Vicinity Map 42~/2%*:9 - f j " fÂ«/1 ..-r -22.1... / / 4 ..\ 1 j k. ..../ < f // / .7 j i 1 /4 \th& j t</ 12/,21 j< 8 i t \\ - /44 -,A-52+442 Â» Â°<iÂ«~---~fl~~ / i lf// 1 4 16\ C // ( \Â»\ fi liA Highlands Base 6= N - i t------~ ff-Exhibitrl Lane 1 //9(0211 \ /1 1 1 20Â» L -- r 9 0 Maroon Creek Road~ 4 ~ W-~E f (99Â»9 ~ ~ 1\ f c..-, -~~ | 0265 Exhibition Lane N -J ~~ i_Mr. McCon-nick's Parcel ~ S / 4/ Â£1 -4$ / -77 - -- /7-4 1 / .. State of C.Inr,rin trqrâ€¢ dbove This Line For Recording Data DEED OF TRUST (With Future Advance Clause) 1. DATE AND PARTIES. The date of this Deed of Trust (Security Instrument) is ,,.PEURMAER..2.1,4,.20,00 and the parties, their addresses and tax identification numbers, if required, are as follows: GRANTOR: JOHN MCCORMICK JOHN T. MCCORMICK IPO BOX 2974 PO BOX 2974 ASPEN, CD 81612 ASPEN, CO 81612 E If checked, refer to the attached Addendum incorporated herein, ~or' additional Grantors, their signatures and acknowledgments. TRUSTEE: PUBLIC TRUSTEE OF PITKIN COUNTY LENDER: COMMUNITY BANKS OF COIORADO ORGANIZED AND EXISTING UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF COLORADO 210 NORTH MILL STREET ASPEN, CO 81611 TAXPAYER I.D. #: 84-0638700 2. CONVEYANCE. For good and valuable consideration, the receipt and sufficiency of which is acknowledged, and to secure the Secured Debt (defined below) and Grantor's performance under this Security Instrument, Grantor irrevocably grants, conveys and sells to Trustee, in trust for the benefit of Lender, with power of sale, the following described property: LOT 15, BLOCK G, THE ASPEN HIGHLANDS VILLAGE P.U.D., ACCORDING TO THE PLAT THEREOF RECORDED OCTOBER 15, 1998 IN PLAT BOOK 47 AT PAGE 1 AS RECEPTION NO. 423275. COUNTY OF PITKIN, STATE OF COIDRADO. The property islocated in PITKIN... ..,....,,.,,.,,...., ,., .at. ... ..... (County) 026.5,.EXHIBITI.ON,LANE.. ..ASPEN. ., Colorado ..41611. (Address) (City) (ZIP Code) Together with all rights, easements, appurtenances, royalties, mineral rights, oil and gas rights, all water and riparian rights, ditehes, and water stock and all existing and future improvements, structures, fixtures, and replacements that may now, or at any time in the future, be part of the real estate described above (all referred to as "Property"). 3. MAXIMUM OBLIGATION LIMIT. The total principal amount secured by this Security Instrument at any one time shall not exceed $ 200'.0.00...O.0....... . This limitation of amount does not include interest and other fees and charges validly made pursuant to this Security Instrument. Also, this limitation does not apply to advances made under the terms of this Security Instrument to protect Lender' s security and to perform any of the covenants contained in this Security Instrument. 4. SECURED DEBT AND FUTURE, ADVANCES. The term "Secured Debt" is defined as follows: A. Debt incurred under the terms of all promissory note(s), contract(s), guaranty(s) or other evidence of debt described below and all their extensions, renewals, modifications or substitutions. (When referencing the debts below it is suggested that you include Items such as borrowers' names, note amounts, interest rates, maturity dates, etc.) PROMISSORY NCIE NUMBER 88571505 DATED DECEMBER 21, 2000 IN THE ORIGINAL PRINCITAL AMOUNT OF $200,000.00 NAMING JOHN MCCORMICK AS BORROWER AND CCMMUNITY BANKS OF COLORADO AS LENDER. COLORADO - DEED OF TRUST (NOT FOR FNMA, FHLMC. FHA OR VA USE=1 ~AA *ge t of 4/ Â© 1994 Bankers Sy/ems, Inc., St. Cloud. MN Form RE-DT-CO 10/23/98 1 \37 - 0. r 1 1 1 . 0 9 . N. I OTIS,WALKER t 6 McCORMICK REAL ESTATE March 26,2001 R.E. Lot 15 G Maroon Neighborhood Aspen Highlands Village PUD Application to increase the number ofADU (caretaker) units from 10 to 11. Minor PUD amendment. Proposal: The applicant would like to build an ADU unit in an area ofthe house that would not affect nor require any adjustment to the FAR. See accompanying architectural floor plans. This is consistent with the relvant standards: A) N/A B) The proposal does not change the use. C) ADU units were anticipated, desirable and are permitted. D) The proposed activity does not i) Change the basic character of the approved use o f the land- it will not require any increase in the size ofthe house. iD There will be no off site impact iii) Public health, safety and welfare will not be affected iv) On site parking will be handled easily (one car) by a space to south ofthe house. Affordable housing generation will be positively affected v) There will be no affect on FAR. 41 C John McCormick 302 E. Hopkins Avenue, Aspen, Colorado 81611 (970) 920-4500 Fax (970) 920-1085 (800) 598-7147 Email: oandw@sopris.net Website: www.otisandwalker.com r--- r i 0 . Exh 16/. June 21,2001 RECEIVED James Lindt JUN 25 1 Community Development Office ASPEN / P! 1 AiN 4 Aspen, CO 81611 City of Aspen COAMIJITYDEVELOPMENT 130 South Galena Street 11 Dear James. Please accept this letter as our authorization for John McCormick, owner of Aspen Highands Village Maroon Neighborhood Lot 15, to proceed with an application to amend the Aspen Highlands Village PUD for the addition of an ADU to his proposed home. Aip{n Per your request, I have researched and confirmed that the 10 certificates issued with prior lot sales at Aspen Highlands were offered at no cost to the lot buyer. In addition, no cost premium HIGHLARDS was placed on lots that were sold with the certificate. We recommend that Mr. McCormick's application be reviewed at the administrative level. VILLAGE Please feel free to contact me with any questions or concerns you have regarding this matter. Sincerely, PO. Box 5115 -92(1 Aspen, Colorado 81612 David Norden CC: John McCormick (970) 920- 1710 Fax (970) 920-3955 IJ .44- .,46.jil'*69â‚¬~.~ Â¢,EN-9 " 4 -1 - 1 le"-416Â£:-26Â· e e. 1 & , 44*4.* c, ' .UN=:1".ild'- 01,~ '-A -Â· â€¢l:W..6 /'.4 . 1 13--,2 4 2 1Â·.cÂ·Â°tf33~ 1 . 16 -ITt 4 Â·..,t-lipÂ°4-02; le..gi l e 4 Â·... / I :- 9 AVAL.rA .1.- .... - - 8 -Ii. 4 . f 2/ ./ - rli 49 4 4. '6.'i.2, illaa â€¢ ,~~Ajht'~4*523 L.TUUÂ·~t.Â·Fr' ' ,4. ~r o A'Ubâ€¢A/ -00 *R~*1 ' 7 '1;:â‚¬t,? 1, 1 Â· >imit 4/5 - ,-- -*r. 3./.99161>-A/6.743 . <â‚¬>-,r -4-4,42. f.t..11 ~44.Lfrbi 4 12 ' , s yÂ£~4 Â·S U ALLL-r ./.- .......1-*. â€ž,4, N._.r , 4 4 7 - LA~* , 4~1. 6 Cfr 2 4 1 4Â©-Opir-i-lj T.1-1 U P~ER BOW 1 ...i- 2.1-Â« AZEr. u':,4 './... 8 ~ -1.. 5 445 L... 11 .17 AML N. MIll Â·Â·> , 4'fizi~,Rd<244 to - 4-99* ..eN;\ 2 ~'.G 41*45'f--13.1. \3~,1,461 7 ..FIEV'LU-J//Nillifh '3441 14, 4 9--r-; i'*) 11 , -VEL... 743 41 kÂ· '~ 4\31, 4 ge)2*=e D" 6,1446 1 Awr.1.up- 7 ~ r #. 7..0, - - 'fle,we'. â‚¬%'0! 1/ -471- 32 jo'*1. :~~ 8 q* ~0 ~ ~<j~~ J,4 . . . -- 440*w MAROON â„¢ 4.. 82&~ lit'-Weet.1:lizpsh --9- . 24-b . 71Â» 4 ' .--221~0 13..-4*7~QI&%~,~~Lf 137' ./.h WIP"vau . ,/9,- -- 126*Wr *41Â¢fi?%.il~,"~, 3~~~~~~~~~~~~~-~~<~<~4~7~:~t~,/: ; . /-221219.-REI 17...# fi --CE -- .. . 1 9 . /. Â»76.Imati - 4*EZZIZIZZE" "1 '9, E /29Â· r 4 â‚¬ 4 . ----- 4 . \4 %7 , >7 I - 6 14 1-:'2~ ~ I --- <. *. c.'' 44 - , I t r.'1' 4*7' . 1 4 6.6 129*wAE# 17 24 f< VA#f 45#'r'v.' ,<t.r i. v. 44, >44 .4.319? - -D .Al 11% - --I./ - 2/Â£ 62-*5~~I/A 1 WE' + 1*.7 .196-0 - ---/*'*= 111 . R~EIVED *~a Jm 0 8 2001 MOMCM # 11 AIN COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT R.E. Review Standards Lot 15 Block G Aspen Highlands PUD ADU application John McCormick: applicant A. General Requirements 1) Application compatible with all aspects ofthe Aspen Area Community Plan. 2) There are other ADU units in the area. 3) The surrounding area will not be adversely affected; the ADU will not require any changes to the house footprint. 4) Exempt from GMQS B. Establishment of Dimensional Requirements 1) The proposed dimensional requirements comply. 2) Yes 3) One off street parking space will be created for the ADU 4) Infrastructure is adequate 5) The site is suitable 6) The community encourages ADU's; the site does not have any constraints which may make the ADU difficult to incorporate. The development is compatible with the surrounding development pattern. C. Site Design Proposed development complies with PUD D. Landscape Plan Proposed development complies with Highlands and City ofAspen landscaping guidelines. E. Architectural Character Proposed development complies with Highlands and City ofAspen architectural guidelines. F. Lighting Alllighting will comply with the Outdoor Lighting standards. G. N/A 0 0 26.445.050 Review Standards: Conceptual, Final, Consolidated, and Minor PUD. A development application for Conceptual, Final, Consolidated Conceptual and Final, or Minor PUD shall comply with tile following standards and requirements. Due to the limited issues associ- amd with Conceptual Reviews and properties eligible for Minor PUD Review, certain standards shall not be applied as noted. The burden shall rest upon an applicant to show the reasonableness of the development application, and its conformity to the standards and procedures of this Chapter and this title. A. General requirements. 1. The proposed development shall be consistent with the Aspen Area Community Plan. 2. The proposed development shall be consistent with the character of existing Iand uses in the surrounding area. 3. The proposed development shall nOI adversely affect the future development of the sur- rounding area. 4. -e proposed development has either been granted GMQS allotments, is exempt from -QS, or GMQS allotments are available to accommodate the proposed development and wiii be considered prior to, or in combination with. final PUD development plan review. B. Establishment of Dimensional Requirements: The final PUD development plans shall establish the dimensional requirements for all proper- ties within the PUI) as described in General Provisions, Section 26.445.040. above. The di- men- mal requiremenrs of the underlying zone district shall be used as a guide in determining the .. propriate dimensions for the PUD. During review of the proposed dimensional require- me- --cs, compatibility with surrounding land uses and existing development patterns shall be emphasized. The proposed dimensional requirements shall comply with the following: 1. The proposed dimensional requirements for the subject property are appropriate and compatible with the following influences on the property: a) The character of, and compatibility with, existing and expected future land uses in the suIrounding area. b) Natural or man-made hazards. c) Existing naturi characteristics of the property and surrounding area such as steep slopes. waterways, shade, and significant vegetation and landforms. d) Existing and proposed man-made characteristics of the property and the surrounding area such as noise, traffic, transit, pedestrian circulation, parking, and historical re- Sources. 2. The proposed dimensional requirements pennit a scale, massing, and quantity of open space and site coverage appropriate and favorable to the character of the proposed PUD and of the surrounding area. (Aspen 4/00) 584 26.445.050 to public spaces and other buildings, use of materials, and other attributes which may signifi- candy represent the character of the proposed development. There shall be approved as part of the final development plan an architectural character plan, which adequately depicts the char- acter of the proposed development. The proposed architecture of the development shall: 1. be compatible with or enhance the visual character of the city, appropriately relate to exist- ing and proposed architecture of the property, represent a character suitable for, and indica- tive of, the intended use, and respect the scale and massing of nearby historical and cultural resources. 2. incorporate, to the extent practical, natural heating and cooling by taking advantage of the property's solar access. shade, and vegetation and by use of non- or less-intensive me- chanical systems. 3. accommodate the storage and shedding of snow, ice, and water in a safe and appropriate manner that does not require significant maintenance. F. Lighting The purpose of this standard to ensure the exterior of the development will be lighted in an appropnate manner considering both public safety and general aesthetic concerns. The follow- ing standards shall be accomplished: 1. All lighting is proposed so as to prevent direct glare or hazardous interference of any kind to adjoining streets or lands. Lighting of site features, structures, and access ways is pro- posed in an appropriate manner. 2. All exterior lighting shall in compliance with tile Outdoor Lighting Standards unless oth- erwise approved and noted in the final PUD documents. Up-lighting of site features, build- ins, landscape elements, and lighting to call inordinate attention to the property is prohib- ited for residential development. G. Common Park, Open Space, or Recreation Area. If tile proposed development includes a conunon park, open space, or recreation area for the mutual benefit of all development in the proposed PUD, the following criteria shall be met: 1. The proposed amount, location, and design of the common park, open space, or recreation area enhances the character of the proposed development, considering existing and pro- posed structures and natural landscape features of the property, provides visual relief to the property's built fonn, and is available to the mutual benefit of the various land uses and property users of the PUD. 2. A proportionate, undivided interest in all common park and recreation areas is deeded in perpetuity (not for a number of years) to each lot or dwelling unit owner within the PUD or ownership is proposed in a similar manner. 3. There is proposed an adequate assurance through a legal instrument for the permanent care and maintenance of open spaces, recreation areas, and shared facilities together with a deed restriction against future residential, commercial, or industrial development. 587 (Aspen 4/00) - O 7 NI j /, U2 11., 11"i JUN-VE-ZUU! h[ i. DU M. .. 26.445.050 Notes: a) Lot sizes for individual lots within a PUD may be established at a higher or lower rate than specified in the underlying zone disnict as long as, on average, the er.tire PUD confonns to the maximum density provisions of the respective zone disnict or as otherwise established as the maimum allowable density pursuant to a Final PUD Development Plan. b) The approved dimensional requirements for all lots within the PUL) are required to be re- flected in the Enal PUD development plans. C. Site Design. The purpose of this standard is to ensure the PUD enhances public spaces, is complimentary to the site' s natural and manÂ·made features and the adjacent public spaces, and ensures the pub- lic' s health and safety. The proposed development shall comply with the following: 1. Eisting natural or man-made features of the site which are unique, provide visual interest or a specific reference to the past, or contribute ro the identity of rhe town are prsserved or enhanced in an appropriate mar.Iler 2. Souctures have been clustered to appropriately preserve significant open spaces and vista 3. Structures me appropriately oriented to pub]ic stmets, contribute to the urban or rural con- text where appropriate, and provide visual interest and engagement of vehicular and pedes- trian movement. 4. Buildings and access ways are appropriately arranged to allow emergency and service ve- hicle access. 5. Adequate pedestrian and handicapped access is provided. 6. Site drainage is accommodaced for the,roposed development in a practical and reasonable m*mner and shall not negatively impact surrounding properties. 7. For non-residential land uses. spaces between buildings are appropriately designed to ac- commodate any programmatic functions associated with the use. D. Landscape Plan. The purpose of this standard is zo ensure compatibilizv of the proposed landscape with the vis- ual character of the city, with surrounding parcels. and with existing and proposed features of the subject property. The proposed development shall comply with the following: I. The landscape plan exhibits a well designated treatment of exterior spaces, preserves exist- ing significan: vegetation, and provides an ample quantity and variety of omamental plant species suitable for the Aspen area climate. 2. Significant existing natural and man-made site featurei which provide uniqueness and in- temst in rhe landscape, are preserved or enhanced in an appropriate manner. 3. The proposed method of protecting existing vegetation and other landscape features is ap- propliate. E. Architectural Churacter< It is the purpose of this slandard is to encourage architectural inerest, vanety, character, and visual identity in the proposed development and within the City while promotins efficient use of resources. Architectural character is based upon the suitability of a building for Its purposes, legibility of the building's use, the building's proposed mas.sing, proportion, scale, Orientation (Aspen 4/00) 586 , e . 3. The appropriate number of off-street parking spaces shall be established based on the fol- lowing considerations: a) The probable number of cars used by those using the proposed development including any non-residential land uses. b) The vmying time periods of use, whenever joint use of common parking is proposed. c) The availability of public transit and other transportation facilities, including those for pedestrian access and/or the commitment to utilize automobile disincentive techniques in the proposed development. d) The proximity of the proposed development to the commercial core and general activ- ity centers in the city. 4. The maximum allowable density within a PUD may be reduced if there exists insufficient infrastructure capabilities. Specifically, the maximum density of a PUD may be reduced if: a) There is not sufficient water pressure, drainage capabilities, or other utilities to service the proposed development. b) There are not adequate roads to ensure fire protection, snow removal, and road main- tenance to tile proposed development. 5. The maximum allowable density within a PUD may be reduced if there exists natural haz- aids or critical natural sire features. Specifically, the maximum density of a PUD may be reduced if: a) The land is not suitable for the proposed development because of ground instability or the possibility of mud flow, rock falls or avianche dangers. b) The effects of the proposed development are derrimental to the natural watershed. due to runoff. drainage, soil erosion, and consequent water pollution. c) The proposed development will have a pernicious effect on air quality in the surround- ing area and the City. d) The design and location of any proposed structure, road, driveway, or trail in the pro- posed development is not compatible with the terrain or causes harmful disturbance to crirical natural features of the site. 6. The maximum allowable density within a PUD may be increased if there exiSIS a Signifi- cant community goal to be achieved through such increase and the development pattern is compatible with its surrounding development patterns and with the site' s physical con- strints. Specificaliy, the maximum density of a PUD may be increased if: a) The increase in density serves one or more goals of the community as expressed in the Aspen Area Community Plan (AACP) or a specific area plan to which the property is subject. b) The site' s physical capabilities can accommodate additional density and there exists no negative physical characteristics of the site, as identified in subparagraphs 4 and 5, above, those areas call be avoided, or those characteristics mitigated. c) The increase in maximum density results in a development pattern compatible with. and complimentary to, the surrounding existing and expected development pattern, land uses, and characteristics. 585 (Aspen 4/00) 2 / 7 4+07 . 26.445.060 1. All phases, including the initial phase, shall be designed to function as a complete devel- opment and shall not be reliant on subsequent phases. 2. The phasing plan describes physical areas insulating, to the extent practical, occupants of initial phases from tile construction of later phases. 3. The proposed phasing plan ensures the necessary or proportionate improvements to public facilities, payment of impact fees and fees-in-lieu, construction of any facilities to be used jointly by residents of the PUD, construction of any required affordable housing, and any mitigation measures are realized concurrent or prior to the respective impacts associated with the phase. 26.445.060 Application Materials. X. Conceptual Development Plan. The contents of a development application for a conceptual development plan shall include the following: 1. The general application information required in Common Procedures, Section 26.304. 2. A Site Improvement Survey depicting: a) Existing natural and man-made site features. b) Existing topography and categorization of site slopes falling within the thresholds de- scribed in General Provisions, Section 26.445.040. c) All legal easements and restrictions. 3. A conceptual description and site plan of the proposed development including a statement of the objectives to be achieved by the PUI) and a description of the proposed land uses, densities, natural features, traffic and pedestrian circulation, off-street parking, open space areas, infrastructure improvements, and site drainage. 4. A conceptual architectural character plan generally indicating the use, massing, scale, and orientation of the proposed buildings. 5. A conceptual landscape plan generally describing the type, location, and size of existing and proposed landscape features. 6. A general description of the dimensional requirements being considered. 7. A written response to each of the PUD Review Criteria contained in section 25.445.030. B. Final, Consolidated, and Minor Development Plan. The contents of the development application for a Final, Consolidated Conceptual and Final, and Minor development plan shall include the following: 1. The general application information required in Common Procedures, Section 26.304. 2. A Site Improvement Survey depicting: a) Existing natural and man-made site features. b) Existing topography and categorization of site slopes falling within the thresholds de- scribed in General Provisions, Section 26.445.040. c) All legal easements and restrictions. 589 (Aspen 4/00) 0 . PUBLIC NOTICE RE: ASPEN HIGHLANDS VILLAGE PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT AMENDMENT TO ALLOW FOR AN ELEVENTH ACCESSORY DWELLING UNIT TO BE CONSTRUCTED WITHIN THE ASPEN HIGHLANDS VILLAGE PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT ON LOT 15, BLOCK G, ASPEN HIGHLANDS VILLAGE NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that a public hearing will be held on Tuesday, July 10, 2001 at a meeting to begin at 4:30 p.m. before the Aspen Planning and Zoning Commission, Sister Cities Room, City Hall, 130 S. Galena St., Aspen, to consider an application submitted by John McCormick requesting an amendment to the Aspen Highlands Village Planned Unit Development to allow for an eleventh ADU to be constructed within the Aspen Highlands Village on Lot 15, Block G. The property is commonly known as 265 Exhibition Lane and is legally described as Lot 15, Block G, Aspen Highlands Village. For further information, contact James Lindt at the Aspen/Pitkin Community Development Department, 130 S. Galena St., Aspeh, CO (970) 920- 5441, jamesl@ci.aspen.co.us. s/Bob Blaich, Chair Aspen Planning and Zoning Commission Published in the Aspen Times on June 23,2001 City of Aspen Account G:/planning/aspen/notices/moorerezone.doc JUN. 22.2001 ~2:53?MI ~INES ASPEN HIGNLANDS VILLAGE NU, flu r. Fax Cover Sheet 1 f -- To: 4040 _OUt Company: ~ ~Â£ ~ ~ | Fax No: 410' 491 Frorn: Matthew V, Stokes -Hines ASPER U'"LRODS VILLAGE Date: ati,v - 1 Pages: . I ~ An original hard copy of this transmission 1-lwm []will not be sent separaterb , t' yoU do not receive sri pages. please call _ NOTICE OF CONFIDEN'TIALTY: The in fornmion corlcin,d in this FAX B wrtfident and/gr priv#ba. - This FAX is intendcd to be reviewed frtiblly by onlythe individual rlamed above. Irthe r=der orchis TRANSMrITAL PAGE is not:hc incended recipimt, or reprcs:no:ive of the interlded recipic:,4 you ort hereby notificdthnt nay mview, digenlination, or copying octhis FAX or the inform=don 904#ined herein ie prohibited. Iryou receive Ehis FAX in error, plcue imm,di=Ty noti19 Ihc sader by tekphone and rccum this FAX to the $(nderatthc address below. Thank you. -- Post Office Box 5115 Aspen, Colorado 81612 (970) 920 1710 te/-(970) 920 3955 fax Documentj J. Daniel Labs, M.D. 941-435-0731 p.1 .. J. Daniel Labs, M.D. From: John McCorrnick Dmacaspen@sopns net] Sent: Tuesday, June 12, 2001 5.49 AM TO: hand@gulfaccess. net Subject: Highlands To: Aspen Communizy Development From: J Dani.-el Labs Lot. 16 Block G A,spen Mighlands PUD R.E. Roof over hang encroachment on cEll de sac side (froril o[ hcuse) of Lot 15 Block G Aspen Highlands PUJ I do not oppose specifically sail roof overtang encroachment over front door of my neighbors 112~93 99 I.on-.+4. ,#' ./Dr- r# j W (/, A A U 430-1t -C./0 911 G - f -1 -Â¢) i Signed J. Daniel Labs Date RECEIVED JUN 1 4 2001 ASPEN / Pll KIN COMMUNITy DEVELOPMENT 1 HINES HIGHLANDS LIMITED ~ HINES HIGHLANDS LIMITED ~ HINES HIGHLANDS LIMITED PARTNERSHIP PARTNERSHIP PARTNERSHIP PO BOX 5 ] 15 PO BOX 5115 PO BOX 5115 ASPEN. CO 81612 ASPEN, CO 81612 ASPEN, CO 81612 HINES MIGHLANDS LIMITED HINES HIGHLANDS LIMITED HINES HIGHLANDS LIMITED PARTNERSHIP PARTNERSHIP PARTNERSHIP PO BOX 5115 PO BOX 5115 PO BOX 5115 ASPEN, CO 81612 ASPEN, CO 81612 ASPEN, CO 81612 HINES HIGHLANDS LIMITED RITZ-CARLTON DEVELOPMENT HINES HIGHLANDS LIMITED PARTNERSHIP COMPANY INC 90Â°/0 PARTNERSHIP PO BOX 5115 6649 WESTWOOD CENTER BLVD STE PO BOX 5115 ASPEN, CO 81612 500 ASPEN. CO 81612 ORLANDO. FL 32821 HINES HIGHLANDS LIMITED THUNDERBOWL ASPEN LLC BUILDING 7 LLC 59.1672% PARTNERSHIP 62 READS WAY C/O ASPEN SKIING COMPANY PO BOX 5115 NEW CASTLE, DE 19720 ASPEN, CO 81612 ASPEN, CO 81612 HINES HiGHLANDS LIMITED HINES HIGHLANDS LIMITED HINES HIGHLANDS LIMITED PARTNERSHIP PARTNERSHIP PARTNERSHIP PO BOX 5115 PO BOX 5115 PO BOX 5115 ASPEN. CO 81612 ASPEN, CO 81612 ASPEN, CO 81612 HINES HIGHLANDS LIMITED CHOPIVSKY GEORGE JR PARTNERSHIP 3217 CATHEDRAL AVE N W PO BOX 5115 WASH INGTON, DC 20008 ASPEN, CO 81612 HINES HIGHLANDS LIMITED HINES HIGHLANDS LIMITED HINES HIGHLANDS LIMITED PARTNERSHIP PARTNERSHIP PARTNERSHIP PO BOX 51]5 PO BOX 5115 PO BOX 5115 ASPEN, CO 81612 ASPEN, CO 81612 ASPEN, CO 81612 PARKER DAVID W 1/5 RITZ-CARLTON DEVELOPMENT CO WILHELM DAVID A & MARY LINDA C/O HINES HIGHLANDS LIMITED INC 1/12 165 SACIO PALM RD PARTNERSHIP 6649 WESTWOOD CENTER BLVD STE VERO BEACH. FL 32963 ASPEN. CO 81612 500 ORLANDO, FL 32821 HINES HIGHLANDS LIMITED OCONNELL DANIEL S & GLORIA P GOULD RICHARD &NANCY PARTNERSHIP 16 ROCK RIDGE AVE 337 CANOE HILL RD PO BOX 5115 GREENWICH. CT 06831 NEW CANAAN, CT 06840 ASPEN. CO 81612 HINES HIGHLANDS LIMITED RITZ-CARLTON DEVELOPMENT OXLEY JOHN C PARTNERSHIP COMPANY INC 1437 S BOULDER AVE #1475 PO BOX 5115 6649 WESTWOOD CENTER BLVD STE TULSA, OK 74119-3609 ASPEN, CO 81612 500 ORLANDO, FL 32821 4 444. 4404 4 41%41. 4404 444 4, 4 444. 4 41%41. 44. RITZ-CARLTON DEVELOPMENT ~ RITZ-CARLTON DEVELOPMENT ~ RITZ-CARLTON DEVELOPMENT CO COMPANY INC COMPANY INC INC 1/12 6649 WESTWOOD CENTER BLVD STE 6649 WESTWOOD CENTER BLVD STE 6649 WESTWOOD CENTER BLVD STE 500 500 500 ORLANDO, FL 32821 ORLANDO, FL 32821 ORLANDO, FL 32821 RITZ-CARLTON DEVELOPMENT CO RITZ-CARLTON DEVELOPMENT CO RITZ-CARLTON DEVELOPMENT CO INC 1 /12 INC 1/12 INC 1/12 6649 WESTWOOD CENTER BLVD STE 6649 WESTWOOD CENTER BLVD STE 6649 WESTWOOD CENTER BLVD STE 500 500 500 ORLANDO, FL 32821 ORLANDO, FL 32821 ORLANDO, FL 32821 RITZ-CARLTON DEVELOPMENT CO RITZ-CARLTON DEVELOPMENT CO RITZ-CARLTON DEVELOPMENT CO INC 1/12 INC 1/12 INC 1/12 6649 WESTWOOD CENTER BLVD STE 6649 WESTWOOD CENTER BLVD STE 6649 WESTWOOD CENTER BLVD STE 500 500 500 ORLANDO, FL 32821 ORLANDO. FL 32821 ORLANDO, FL 32821 RITZ-CARLTON DEVELOPMENT CO RITZ-CARLTON DEVELOPMENT CO RITZ-CARLTON DEVELOPMENT CO INC 1/12 INC 1/12 INC 1/12 6649 WEST'WOOD CENTER BLVD STE 6649 WESTWOOD CENTER BLVD STE 6649 WESTWOOD CENTER BLVD STE 500 500 500 ORLANDO, FL 32821 ORLANDO, FL 3282] ORLANDO, FL 32821 RITZ-CARLTON DEVELOPMENT CO RITZ-CARLTON DEVELOPMENT CO ADLER RITA N TRUST INC 1/12 INC 1/12 3125 HASSI POINT 6649 WESTWOOD CENTER BLVD STE 6649 WESTWOOD CENTER BLVD STE LONGWOOD. FL 32779 500 500 ORLANDO, FL 32821 ORLANDO, FL 32821 RITZ-CARLTON DEVELOPMENT CO RITZ-CARLTON DEVELOPMENT CO LINDAUER JERRY D & REBBECCA F INC 1/12 INC 1/12 2400 PORTOFINO RIDGE DR 6649 WESTWOOD CENTER BLVD STE 6649 WESTWOOD CENTER BLVD STE AUSTIN, TX 78735 500 500 ORLANDO, FL 32821 ORLANDO, FL 32821 RITZ-CARLTON DEVELOPMENT CO RITZ-CARLTON DEVELOPMENT CO RITZ-CARLTON DEVELOPMENT CO INC 1/12 INC 1/12 INC 1/12 6649 WESTWOOD CENTER BLVD STE 6649 WESTWOOD CENTER BLVD STE 6649 WESTWOOD CENTER BLVD STE 500 500 500 ORLANDO, FL 32821 ORLANDO FL 32821 ORLANDO. FL 32821 KRAUSS LAWRENCE & KATHERINE RITZ-CARLTON DEVELOPMENT CO RITZ-CARLTON DEVELOPMENT CO 1/12 JT INC 1/12 INC 1 /12 C/O ASPEN HIGHLANDS CONDO 6649 WESTWOOD CENTER BLVD STE 6649 WESTWOOD CENTER BLVD STE ASSOC 500 500 ORLANDO, FL 32821 ORLANDO, FL 32821 ORLANDO, FL 32821 HINES HIGHLA1\IDS LIMITED RITZ-CARLTON DEVELOPMENT CO RITZ-CARLTON DEVELOPMENT CO PARTNERSHIP INC 1/12 INC 1/12 PO BOX 5115 6649 WESTWOOD CENTER BLVD STE 6649 WESTWOOD CENTER BLVD STE ASPEN, CO 81612 500 500 ORLANDO. FL 32821 ORLANDO. FL 32821 RITZ-CARLTON DEVELOPMENT CO RITZ-CARLTON DEVELOPMENT CO RITZ-CARLTON DEVELOPMENT CO INC 1/12 INC 1/12 INC 1/12 6649 WESTWOOD CENTER BLVD STE 6649 WESTWOOD CENTER BLVD STE 6649 WESTWOOD CENTER BLVD STE 500 500 500 ORLANDO, FL 32821 ORLANDO, FL 32821 ORLANDO, FL 32821 -444 41%411. 4404 *44 4, HINES HIGHLANDS LIMITED ~ RITZ-CARLTON DEVELOPMENT CO~ RITZ-CARLTON DEVELOPMENT PARTNERSHIP INC 1 /12 COMPANY INC PO BOX 5115 6649 WESTWOOD CENTER BLVD STE 6649 WESTWOOD CENTER BLVD STE ASPEN, CO 81612 500 500 ORLANDO, FL 32821 ORLANDO. FL 3282! RITZ-CARLTON DEVELOPMENT RITZ-CARLTON DEVELOPMENT RITZ-CARLTON DEVELOPMENT COMPANY INC COMPANY INC COMPANY INC 6649 WESTWOOD CENTER BLVD STE 6649 WESTWOOD CENTER BLVD STE 6649 WESTWOOD CENTER BLVD STE 500 500 500 ORLANDO. FL 32821 ORLANDO, FL 32821 ORLANDO, FL 32821 RITZ-CARLTON DEVELOPMENT HENRIKSEN RONALD W ASPEN HIGHLANDS LOT 6 LLC COMPANY INC 8831 STABLE LN 8606 ALLISON RD STE 127 6649 WESTWOOD CENTER BLVD STE HOUSTON, TX 77024 INDIANAPOLIS, IN 46250 500 ORLANDO. FL 32821 WHITE THOMAS & SUSAN HENRIKSEN RONALD W LAKESHORE PUBLISHING CO 27 S ROYAL FERN DR 8831 STABLE LN 990 GROVE ST THE WOODLANDS, TX 77380 HOUSTON. TX 77024 EVANSTON, IL 60201 AQUA 2322 CORP JONES & JONES LEASING CO TALLMAN JOSEPH P 301 COSTANERA RD 6301 HAGGERTY RD 380 INCA PKWY CORAL GABLES, FL 33]43 BELLEVILLE, MI 48111 BOULDER, CO 80303 MAROON CREEK LIMITED ASPEN HIGHLANDS LOT 7 LLC LOT 9 HIGHLANDS LLC PARTNERSHIP 8606 ALLISON RD STE 127 7 1 04 MELROSE CASTLE LN 1926 CLOVER CT INDIANAPOLIS, IN 46250 BOCA RATON, FL 33496 PLEASONTON, CA 94588 THUNDERBOWL LLLP HINES GERALD D 10% LOT 10 HIGHLANDS LLC 28 PARK AVE W 9TH FL 280 POST OAK BLVD 7104 MELROSE CASTLE LN MANSFIELD, O}-144902 HOUSTON, TX 77056 BOCA RATON, FL 33496 HINES HIGHLANDS LIMITED KLUMP MICHAEL A CAM DEVELOPMENT LLC PARTNERSHIP 2593 DELLWOOD DR 424 PARK CIR #3 PO BOX 5115 ATLANTA. GA 30305 ASPEN, CO 81611 ASPEN, CO 81612 HINES HIGHLANDS LIMITED SHANNAHAN CORNELIUS KEVIN & BASS ERWIN LLC PARTNERSHIP JOAN C PO BOX 5078 PO BOX 5115 8 EXMOOR LN ASPEN. CO 81612 ASPEN, CO 81612 LINCOLNSHIRE, IL 60069 LOT 5 HIGHLANDS VILLAGE HINES HiGHLA1\IDS LIMITED GORDON LETICIA B HOLDINGS LLC PARTNERSHIP 3663 GRAND AVE UNIT 904 C/O HENRY DRUKER PO BOX 5]!5 DES MOINES, IA 50312-4369 NEWYORK, NY 10021 ASPEN, CO 81612 444 4 444. 4404 .4 4 41%43. 444'. 4 444. 4, 4 . 0 CITY OF ASPEN PRE-APPLICATION CONFERENCE SUMMARY* PLANNER: Nick Lelack, 920-5095 DATE: March 20, 2001 PROJECT: Minor PUD Amendments to the Aspen Highlands Village PUD APPLICANT: John McCormick, 920-4500 TYPE OF APPLICATION: Minor PUD Amendment DESCRIPTION: The applicant would like to increased the number of accessory (caretaker) dwelling units available at the Aspen Highlands Village from 10 to 11. Address Applicable Sections of the Land Use Code & Ordinance 24, Series of 1999 Land Use Code Chapter 26.304, Common Development Review Procedures. Section 26.480.060(A)(3) and (B), Final Plat requirements. Ordinance 8, Series of 2000 This ordinance established review criteria to evaluate minor PUD amendments for the Aspen Highlands Village PUD. These criteria must be addressed in the application. Section 4. The Community Development Director is hereby authorized to approve minor PUD amendments to the Aspen Highlands Village PUD which are intended to change an element or condition of the development permit; provided, however, that the proposed amendments are consistent with the following standards: a. The amendment must be a clarification or a technical correction to a plat. b. The amendment must not change the use of the proposed development between ' residential, commercial and tourist accommodation uses. c. The amendment must be consistent with action taken during the review of the original development activity. d. The proposed activity does not: i. Change the basic character of the approved use of land on which the activity occurs including basic visual appearance and method of operation; ii. Increase off-site impacts in the surrounding neighborhood; iii. Endanger public health, safety or welfare; iv. Substantially increase the need for on-site parking or utilities, or affect affordable housing generation; and, v. Increase the floor area of the use by more than two (2) percent or decrease open space on the site by more than three (3)percent. / 9 f 4/ REBAR & CAP t> L.S. ?0133, e, SET C IYPICAI ),1 4 -TENCH El - 8157.27 ts I %4 El_ECTRI(, P.V.C. ' 4 / 1 -blf ./t~ UNDERGROUND ~ \ 6. 1 / 1 . 1 \ . 0 -LE LOT 16 , ' \ \ 4 - Â· PAVEME-f\. 0 ..,4 ><3 / EDGE OF . N. BU[./ G , r. * /O/r 1 / \ 4 . WATER ~ 00043 - 1,/ VALIE d x upLTI ./\4 / .--*/ Tly-X, 10' DHAZNAGE .\ *.-~ / EASEMENT / 0 ' --' --r-* / 1 0 / I ~~i \RE O 1 1 1 ..DRANI 4 - / f 1/ ' ~~ COMMON SEWE\R K/ / 1, ELECTRIC .-- / SERVICN, AREA 3G 1--- 4 ~~'51. A- ~ / 4 4 i \~0' AC~ESS & 41' ~ UTILITY /EASEMEATÂ« . ELECTRIC 0.48 ACI / * , TRANSFORMER ~ ~ / h. / .ELECTRIC 4 1 1 / 2" P.V.C. s , RNICâ‚¬ / OVER TEST HOLE i ~ ~|||~1 1 T 2" PVC CAP / 751/16 SEC. 14. T.10 3. 85 x hu50 A KUMt NUU C â€¢P . ~ FOUND tg 0 . 1 .. /4 5, 0. COMMON r a AREA 56 I oP 1 - 9 F e ,Â·, l ; ~ ~ LALL Â· 1 f #\T \ / -a' ROCK WALL ~ 1 I ... 0. 0 1Â»{ fÂ»m / 1 R -U / i ill i /.0 / /#. 1 9.44 ' i " I ' 2 1 . V - 'Il-- I -Il- I ---1 / 0%732 4 / , h.1 3/ 1// / 1 ~LECTRIC ty -- ---- -AC 4.0 14/14 / 1 / FlfC[/!C i 1 '... 1 1 N 73~â€¢3-'77--- 1.I23 UND'%1) ~ 1 -- - -- % â€¢ SMN 1 --/ 1 64' r f /--1 SITE PLAN 42 / 1" = 20' TREE - 1 .1 d /K Â»- 6- -th ITI 0 - m - O 0 I '- 1- 30- r *-fl 70 3> J3-1.-1 1 1 1 30 lit-1 0 1 147 m i 3 '1 Ll=J O K 0% 1%\- 5 f E-C t 0 11 I 11 7 1 rn -- 30 3 J tb Z /2 9- -1 C /1 / . 43 41.2/ - /1 1 -0 fl t J Lge=Â«3, 0 00 1 0 4 pi 0 CHARLES CUNNIFFE ARCHITECTS 610 EAST HYMAN AVE. * ASPEN, CO 81611 * TELE: 970925-5590 â€¢ FAX: 970920-4557 502 MAIN ST. * SUITE 232 * CARBONDALE, CO 81623 * TELE: 970963--6394 * FAX: 970963-6399 220 E. COLORADO AVE. * TELLURIDE, CO 81435 * TELE: 970*28-3738 * FAX: 970/728-9567 0105 EDWARDS VILLAGE BLVD., STE A205 * EDWARDS, CO 81632 *TELE: 970926-6390 â€¢ FAX: 970926-Â· 585 1010 *ON WOf NY-ld 13A31 153MO1 DNIMVN (] ta m -0 9 70 rO U-0 Z 0-10-10-1 ./'/' .......3.......--3 63. 3117iol -- 'i, i , 0 0-<0 30 11 . ./. , / 0 SE i; . / /4 0-C 0' z /,, 1 / 2/4 .J mt E- c -11 CB If O/ Â«1 , * 1 0 . 407 --0---- --------- ----AA-,zi 3 ' .5 E , 11 :i f e '0~~~~ / <f?4 / 1% 1 4 -< JI 1 3 K -0 / i/w i 171,:~," ,., r- / --I'll-- 26:.11127"E , 62Â·51 / 2 di Z LD T ~ / / / M ' ii 04. 6 +1 L 04 / \\ * 1 \1 1 P,Jep?J : 87SP 0 0.1 .22 // B C -11 (Il -U 11-1 = 11 Â°Na 0%' 01'16 ,/' iri<- 141'111 (D am. z --:>3.0- -Â¥ 2,1 /li , 0.-/ / W 38%902 - - - -+*---- ./ .' i I 44 44 .A : BUILDING ENVELOPE 442444Â©N 30 0 to -. S , e --- - ZOAGTO CLIFF,M 72 i â€¢ 23'0 / 7 4 161/ / :693 1. 20 , 0. 18 , ./4!e44' i / ' 4 0 - ji X U -1 CL I SNO / 42.--- /, Adot , ----7 1 \i Wi i i -- AC , p / ---- 2, , 0, PV. ~ t\/ --- 1 0 1 . -J\\ 44 W k / 131'>U A ' , . u *LX- / / -_-_ 04 1/ 4/4 4.1 / 4/ 51-Onl // 14./1/ \ 329 0 7 1 ' 09"/ -- , - ---- ~- 42;'f./E'Â§~ ~ ~ x mg?d - % , / - -*449/ 1/ \\ , , 30 . / / %2044 \ 3~10 , / A ASEMENT ELECTRIC --- ,/ -/--.I---4 ./ / 444 , / t / \ r* : , .\ 8 44 1 / I , '214.-/0 \ 0 Â» 42*.094> I '\- Â·C. ' ' 1: --- For , i 51 --0- !* *t I , 2 , '- i 1 1 : , 7.9.~ â€¢ 1 i/ 1 . i , k. , , I , 1-~, <44 \ / i. 6544 , Pey G~' / .-a , p ./. NOCK 47 / 4 / / 1490 I , / I' 4 ... 1 1 / -0 - , / , Iii \ , '14 \ 710 15/14 ! PNDE 1 439. / 1 1 iÂ·AS ~?ljND 4 . - . ....4.--- - - 4-1.-4.-1. 1 Â· U-IWO-1 - Eli-<01 .0 < 0 "A 7 0 1 r C 3003 J~ - '29 11%0 r a R r 013Â©49 < C G < Ill Â·1 f Â§4 /74.. I r mill Ell X 4 0 0 4 0 - Fll 7 f /\IÂ»k Â£07 0 70 -3 0 N64% 15'37Â¥ Â»;t/t~~~f-2 *' '4â‚¬I ~tOJAS (_D O RI > 5 - 44 *4 'ofâ‚¬ 6,61 0 N45% 08 .- 1 1-11 0 e S,/ -7 0 [-11 0 (j, %40:6.84 7,r r// 0 - 04 1 C 4440 6 OZ -1 444 ' 37,- I /1'4 0~ |~ Se O \ C A I , 44 S72 23' O... a /9 RE 4 ~ ~ 403 0 0 Ill C FIj ) *joâ€¢ . 29.12 w -48 â‚¬O - 4 * ' t C lili 2 444 \ 246, G 3 47 09 W 551% 07' I' 4,>. EAK UP VALLEY 0,4. ' 7111 0 0 *% 48/ 1 .. 7 1 07.4 7,;.;it.53 4 \ . // 0 4/// 0 1 , 1 1 % RiAB , ~ -1~fL-ic 08' ' / 1 0 ' p. f, 4*8 40 9/ - // 49 / nOW ,Â· 1- - + 1 01 D m -0 10 9/ 1 0(.0023' : 46* / / '3,0\'' / 1 2 407 / / / / 4 14 9 / / / -4, / . / 4 0 3 91 r 24 & .T #9 b ' , / / / 1 44 1 ZE! > / / a. S 47 / Rue xzrn _ 444< / 0 ! 1 1 l 071 - 0 *4 l.. 5/. / 1 %9 1 X 1 -1 - 0 GAS RouN~j;.,// 0 / 0 1 1 1 1 / / 7 p l esl- l Lop + 2 mu" W Z 0 0 6, -< 0 0) 1- gE %-9 I PERM IT SET @ 8 m-+ MICORM ICK RESIDENCE (. CHARLES CUNNIFFE ARCHITECTS OO rÂ·rÂ·1 m Z 0 1 LOT 15 BLOCK G 3 1 Â¥ 610 EAST HYMAN AVE. * ASPEN, CO 81611 * TELE: 970/925-5590 * R 970920-4557 ASPEN HIGHLANDS - iS 502 MAIN ST. * SUITE 232 * CARBONDALE, CO 81623 * TELE: 970/963-6394 * FAX: 970963-6399 PITKIN COUNTY 220 E. COLORADO AVE. * TELLURIDE, CO 81435 * TELE: 970/728-3738 * FAX: 970*28-9567 ASPEN, COLORADO 0105 EDWARDS VILIAGE BLVD., STE A205 * EDWARDS, CO 81435 * TELE: 970926-6590 * FAX: 97Â®26-6525 t I e ENVELOPE OSED MODIFICATI /\40 (*6936 UNV 1NDIHNO-13 3/Vang ' 91HQI EH (3136Â¥16 Gy â‚¬hnol CLIFFS W 11 = 1191/1 GANAbln 311 g DATE :SELLON -IV I aa'hIV=lah!=I ANAEInG Gal NOIJVAN-13 3ONEihIZI=!33 eNI OILVAE-1 3 *HclÂ¥'bleOc!01 116 QL)31.IHJVV 38INNn) 531 IVH) 1HDIVAd 'ON 133HS WWW.CUNNIFFE.COM W -0 - 0-10-10-1 ././././././---- --0-- -11141Â©I .C 3/,i , / mâ€ž ....2.....31' .-'. /- BLD-<0)/0 11 . 0 r. -N ,-/' ,----- 77 # E.9 , 1 1 0t 3/0/ > 030 3 0 .= 22 r -11 ~, 3ii 70 :H 0 0 -1 C il> 1 0< m 4/~\ 1 / // * ///' F-71(33 -32_ 1 --4~ -U = f ,/ f / 014 4 l /1 - --------- ----4474 AB lilli , , LOT 16 *. I , 0 , / \t /1 1 1 : d?ld: / / %112 "E / 2221/; 1 44 / 1 1 2 (D 702[2 > , , / /9 / / I i. / 8,57 Z . i 1, 14044.Col i 59.1 .22 B cllm-01-11 .... OB' 01"t ... .litii/i , 0 n R. z 961 -- m ----- , ' -4- ' E@%962 - , k<~ & sâ‚¬e , BUILDIN ENVELOPE 00*40h/ \/ Vel // \ gii.iii / 144-4 Se J '' I & 2/ i A /D uniffÂ°> i es / 0 -- 12 i ' i i -1? W / / / 3 53 61; Smi i~/, emi ;693 1.50 . , ~/ 0Â· 48 i REAF/\/ iÂ· 4 23'0 CLIFF DE -*.- j illÂ» 7\ 1 / CLI SNO / --- --- A-9= , / 7>49> 42/4 r --- ---4 44 f z / j . -11 41 E- -2 --- 4042 1 1 lilli E-[li --0 1 , I 1\/ i %\\ / , 1/ Ir\\ -O 902 651~41,%110- .0 8, , , -/ ' lilli 1 / \ % )9M , / * 1 ELECTRIC 1 - 434 es \ - --4--- .\ / A, / \iii 1 / / 42644 I . -O 0 - . , / / / 1 ' / S . --3Â« i , 03 <*- 0 . '03 / -0/ -, 49.6 --- % 0 TRANSF , 0 2 LECTRIC 16& 'C., ... 091$4 9 I ..0 / / .9 47 . E-11 1 I i Ca -- / 0 - / I - 1 / 0 1 \ // 1 // , / /480/ 1~' I , /---- AL . I / ' 1 . *44 I / 40 Roe< / . ' U. 0 +\97 / 6. EASEMENT , ~2%3 4 ' WI\Â« \ I / I. / a. l I , . . 1 I ' Iii \ - / - I I I + 1 . / / 5710 ' 1%,14 / / . 2 ELECTRIC / :. 1 bAS ~10,~ND U-IWO-1 -- rril-<01 .0 <0~70 11 -4 U D .-11 .- C 30 03 9 > 4 4/ V + 1 4/ r .11Â¥30 <c 0 4 111 0 4 m ni m X 0 0 0 1117 (07 1 / %.72Â»-bl /3., Fâ‚¬I N64% 15'37Â¥ /62.50' / 0 / 4/4 c G I -1 - (.D O 1-11 I 5 <41 9, ts, Â·22 U48 GROUND NA 5%' 08'of,8 - -74+ n Ell A.,e 310 mo 0 4% 44%47. p r// 0 4,< 30 O Z Â°for., *4Â»9 ~ 90 0 1 --11 0 S XII . S72 23' 0'* CLIFF RE 2 4 cho 0 1-R OZ 403 0 r-'.. - 7 -11 -< 0 \ f ... 0 - m 6 1-T-1 LA * 8 ' 87 . j 4 4042 4% le .. r #\ 551* 07' 09 W VALLEY 4,94, 1/ 04. 0 447 2/104\\ i / PEAK UP 8</% \\ -0.- // 44 \ \>// / . 0 344 / f - 1 / 4 / I ./ ~ / ELED?ANsul-e-- r â‚¬07,3 4 19/14 / OJ %# - 440 / I '... - 1 - A 01 w rn = B 10 B 0 4 ; 47 / 1 46 203 U / l '19,0 / >Ii >-ni D tu LOT / 1 4 11 9 / / l Brn G~70 4, / / / 1 4 0 Nt m 0 g 476 640 1 10,/ / / 1 , / / 224 / / %.4 47 - 1 R 9, 0 44<Â£ N / 0 , 1 1 0 // / c/ 1 *45 1 - 0 7 8, 1 0. , 9 1 ~L~CT Ic k 'i 049 1 / ~rn 0 / 1 / 3 012 4 70 407 / 13 0 m JA ~6 A U M = I PERM IT SET aa a McCORMICK RESIDENCE CHARLES CUNNIFFE ARCHITECTS 00 m m~ 2 0 LOT 15 BLOCK G ~ 2 610 EAST HYMAN AVE. * ASPEN, CO 81611 * TELE: 970925-5590 * FAX: 970920-4557 ASPEN HIGHLANDS - E 502 MAIN ST. * SUITE 232 * CARBONDALE, CO 81623 * TELE: 970/963-6394 * FAX: 970963-6399 20 g PITKIN COUNTY 220 E. COLORADO AVE. * TELLURIDE, CO 81435 * TELE: 970/728-3738 * FAX: 970/728-9567 ASPEN, COLORADO 0105 EDWARDS VILLAGE BLVD., STE A205 * EDWARDS, CO 81435 * TELE: 970/926-6590 * FAX: 970/926-6525 UILPINe ENVELOPE ROPOSED MODIFICATION lathÂ®36 GINV 1NDIANOJE Aang . 91:He 1 31==1 441=1300 (313/%*HAS â‚¬V â‚¬6 (1 01 1*4 816 CLIFFS W 11 = 1,91/1 GABAhln 311 g DATED 05-XX-'01. aZihIVclahlct ANANAG (Ell=Ill :631ON -ly LAN INFORMATION NOIJV/\31 NONEBE=13&1 OllVAE-12 A Â§1331IHOBIÂ¥ 33UINNAD S3121VHO 1119]*WOO Â® 'ON 133HS WWW.CUNNIFFE.COM OTIS,WALKER ~~i cCORMICK REALESTATE J L_ al/vt i Â« <=22) . 302 E. Hopkins Avenue, Aspen, Colorado 81611