Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutagenda.hpc.202207271 AGENDA ASPEN HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION July 27, 2022 4:30 PM, City Council Chambers - 3rd Floor 427 Rio Grande Place Aspen, CO I.ROLL CALL II.MINUTES II.A.Draft Minutes - 6/8/2022, 7/13/2022 minutes.hpc.20220608_DRAFT.docx minutes.hpc.20220713_DRAFT.docx III.PUBLIC COMMENTS IV.COMMISSIONER MEMBER COMMENTS V.DISCLOSURE OF CONFLICT OF INTEREST VI.PROJECT MONITORING VII.STAFF COMMENTS VIII.CERTIFICATE OF NO NEGATIVE EFFECT ISSUED IX.CALL UP REPORTS X.SUBMIT PUBLIC NOTICE FOR AGENDA ITEMS XI.OLD BUSINESS XII.NEW BUSINESS XII.A.312 W Hyman Final Review 312_W_Hyman_Memo_20220727.pdf Exhibit A HPGuidelinesCriteria_312 W Hyman.pdf Exhibit B 312 W Hyman.pdf Exhibit C.1 Application_312_W_Hyman_07272022.pdf Exhibit C.2 Application 312 W Hyman Plans_2022.0427.pdf Exhibit C.3 Home Energy Assessment 312 W Hyman.2022.0427.pdf 1 2 Exhibit C.4 Forestry_Conceptual.2022.0427.pdf 312_W_Hopkins_Resolution_2022_07_27.pdf XIII.ADJOURN XIV.NEXT RESOLUTION NUMBER XV.WORK SESSION XV.A.Work Session Agenda HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION work session 07.27.2022.pdf Project Monitor_FORM_Working_20220725.pdf PREAPPLICATION SUMMARY CHECKLIST LANGUAGE TEMPLATE.pdf TYPICAL PROCEEDING FORMAT FOR ALL PUBLIC HEARINGS (1 Hour, 10 Minutes for each Major Agenda Item) 1. Declaration of Conflicts of Interest (at beginning of agenda) 2. Presentation of proof of legal notice (at beginning of agenda) 3. Applicant presentation (20 minutes) 4. Board questions and clarifications of applicant (5 minutes) 5. Staff presentation (5 minutes) 6. Board questions and clarifications of staff (5 minutes) 7. Public comments (5 minutes total, or 3 minutes/ person or as determined by the Chair) 8. Close public comment portion of hearing 9. Applicant rebuttal/clarification (5 minutes) 10. Staff rebuttal/clarification (5 minutes) End of fact finding. Chairperson identifies the issues to be discussed. 11. Deliberation by the commission and findings based on criteria commences. No further input from applicant or staff unless invited by the Chair. Staff may ask to be recognized if there is a factual error to be corrected. If the item is to be continued, the Chair may provide a summary of areas to be restudied at their discretion, but the applicant is not to re-start discussion of the case or the board’s direction. (20 minutes) 12. Motion Updated: November 15, 2021 2 REGULAR MEETING HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION JUNE 8TH, 2022 Chairperson Thompson opened the meeting of the Aspen Historic Preservation Commission at 4:30pm. Commissioners in attendance: Jeffrey Halferty, Kara Thompson, Peter Fornell, Roger Moyer, Barb Pitchford and Sherri Sanzone. Staff present: Natalie Feinberg Lopez, Historic Preservation Officer Sarah Yoon, Historic Preservation Planner Kate Johnson, Assistant City Attorney Cindy Klob, Records Manager Risa Rushmore, Administrative Assistant II MINUTES: Ms. Pitchford moved to approve the minutes from 4/27/22, 5/25/22, and 6/2/22. Mr. Moyer seconded. Roll call vote: Mr. Moyer, yes; Mr. Fornell, yes; Mr. Halferty, yes; Ms. Pitchford, yes; Ms. Thompson, yes. All in favor, motion passes. PUBLIC COMMENTS: None. COMMISSION MEMBER COMMENTS: Mr. Halferty mentioned that he had been in conversation with Ms. Yoon about the Hotel Jerome’s fixing of the porte cochere. He thought it was a lot but was ok with it if Ms. Yoon was. DISCLOSURE OF CONFLICTS OF INTEREST: None. PROJECT MONITORING: None. STAFF COMMENTS: Ms. Feinberg Lopez mentioned that the HPC awards would be presented at the next City Council regular meeting on June 14th. She then referred to the bike tour that was originally scheduled for May 31st has been postponed until June 28th. She then reminded the board members of the work session scheduled for the next meeting. Ms. Yoon mentioned that any commissioner comments related to the lunch meeting they had with Amy Simon related to the moratorium are due by 6/9/22 at noon. CERTIFICATE OF NO NEGATIVE EFFECT: None. CALL UP REPORTS: None. SUBMIT PUBLIC NOTICE FOR AGENDA ITEMS: Ms. Johnson said that she reviewed public notice and that notice was provided per the code for both agenda items. Ms. Thompson noted that Ms. Sanzone had joined the meeting. OLD BUSINESS:None 3 REGULAR MEETING HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION JUNE 8TH, 2022 NEW BUSINESS: 121 W. Bleeker Street – Final Major Development and Floor Area Bonus, PUBLIC HEARING Applicant Presentation:Derek Skalko – 1 Friday Design Mr. Skalko mentioned that the bulk of this is due to a clarification of the Floor Area and stressed to the commissioners that nothing had changed about the approval. There was a mistake in addition / subtraction, yet the Floor Area discussed was exactly as proposed. He asked Ms. Yoon if it would make sense for the City to make its presentation first. Ms. Yoon thought it was still appropriate for the applicant to go first. Mr. Skalko apologized for the delay and said that he and Ms. Yoon had been working on some finer points and he believed all has been resolved. He started by introducing Gyles Thornely with Connect 1 Design, who would be discussing the landscape plan and the applicant, Ms. Nimmo-Guenther. He again stressing that, per pages 5-10 of the packet that discuss the Floor Area bonus, that after in internal review with Sophie Varga that the total square footage was about 40 square feet off. This should have resulted in a 246 minimum square foot bonus. The approval was for a 205 square foot bonus but included language referencing “the drawings as documented and presented”, which would reflect accurately the Floor Area as it was counted out. He apologized for this clerical error at the initial meeting but hoped the board would see what happened. To catch the board up on what was approved, he showed renderings of the existing conditions and the proposed project and highlighted the substantial reduction of above grade mass and scale. Regarding the materials and fenestrations, he noted that nothing had changed for the conceptual approval to the final approval. They have just detailed a little bit more information about the materials. He then went over some of the proposed materials for the addition which are intended to reduce the look of the scale and produce a very quiet solution to what is existing right now. He also described a bit about the restoration of the historic asset and mentioned that they do not have a lot of exterior damages on the North, East and West elevations and have a lot of information to go by. He did say that since so much of the rear (South) side of the Victorian has been enveloped by the non-historic addition for the early 1990’s, they have less to go by until they get into the framing. Mr. Skalko turned things over to Mr. Thornely, to go over details of the landscape plan. He said there is very little change to the landscape design, mainly just enhancements. He then showed the overhead demolition plan in order to highlight changes to the entry walkway. He went on to describe the changes to the walkway, comparing the existing and proposed layouts. Mr. Fornell asked if the existing stepped design of the walkway would be replicated in the proposed layout or would it be sloped. Mr. Thornely said it would be sloped and that the amount of slope does not require steps. Mr. Thornely then addressed some comments about the right of way plantings and said they had been working with the Parks Department on these. Most of the time these are not allowed, but the applicant is asking the board and the Parks Department to reconsider the removal of the perennial species in lieu of sod. He explained that perennials require a lot less water than sod and that their removal would really detract from how marvelous they currently look. Mr. Halferty asked if the civil drawings could be shared and discussed. Mr. Skalko showed the civil drawings and mentioned that most of the civil work will fall on the west side yard property area of the Victorian as this area is completely free of tree canopy and is also the low point of the lot. Mr. Halferty 4 REGULAR MEETING HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION JUNE 8TH, 2022 asked about the details of the drywells. Mr. Skalko went over these details, including that the covers would be integrated into and mostly hidden by the perennials that are planned. Ms. Sanzone asked where exactly the drywell covers would be located on the plans. Mr. Thornley pointed out the approximate location on the plans that falls within the sodded area. Ms. Sanzone asked if it could be slightly moved to be located in an area of perennials, to which Mr. Thornely said yes. Ms. Sanzone said the form of the planting beds in the right of way on the proposed plans was a little different to how the beds are existing on site currently and asked how these compare. Mr. Thornely said the edge of the existing beds were drawn for aerial photos and that they proposed beds are exactly as they are today. Ms. Sanzone asked about how the beds would be protected during construction. Mr. Thornely said they are working with a greenhouse that will be removing the perennials, potting them, and then replanting them after construction using a photographic inventory of their current location. Mr. Fornell asked if the plants were a variety that can be readily replaced if some were lost in the removal and storage during construction. Mr. Thornely said yes. Ms. Thompson asked for clarification on some of the materials. Mr. Skalko provided details on these materials. She asked for clarification of the proposed materials of the walkways and patios. Ms. Pitchford asked about the plans for the front yard wrought iron fence that is not historic. Mr. Thornely said he did know how long it had been there but that they would like to keep it to avoid adding any additional footers. Ms. Thompson said it would be discussed later in the meetings. Staff Presentation: Sarah Yoon – Historic Preservation Planner Ms. Yoon started by going over the request for approval and the lot description. She went over the history of the past two design reviews and subsequent revisions and said that the design that is before the board today was approved by a 7-0 vote from HPC. She commended that applicant team for bringing this resource back to the community. She reminded the board that the design footprint, massing, and scale were all finalized thorough conceptual approval and that the revisions to the Floor Area bonus do not result in any change or increase of the mass and scale of the approved design. She then went over some of the staff comments related to the landscape design and said that the landscape plan that was presented in the packet to staff was a bit different from what Mr. Thornely presented in his presentation. She highlighted a few Historic Preservation Guidelines related to walkways and said that staff is requesting a revised landscape plan to look over with staff and monitor to ensure the width is appropriate, the steps are removed and only meandering where trees are being avoided. She mentioned the plantings in the right of way and while realizing they are very mature and the timeframe of when the encroachment into the right of way is not known, there is a concern of the privatization of the right of way. This will be more of a conversation between the applicant and the Parks Department, but staff is asking that it be a part of the landscaping plan to make sure it is compliant. Ms. Yoon then discussed the wrought iron fence and that staff, while realizing it may have historic qualities, does not believe it is original to the site. Staff Is recommending the removal of the fence but would like the board to have discussion related to it. Lastly, she briefly went over the revision to the Floor Area Bonus. In closing she said that staff is recommending approval of the Final Major Development with conditions and went on to describe the conditions. Mr. Fornell asked if this was called up by City Council during conceptual review. Ms. Yoon confirmed this and mentioned that Council had some pointed questions about the massing and wanted a better 5 REGULAR MEETING HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION JUNE 8TH, 2022 understanding of the sighting of the project. After the call up Council did uphold all HPC’s approvals including benefits awarded. Ms. Thompson asked what the height of the existing fence is. Mr. Thornley said the majority of it is 36 inches with some of it coming up to about 46 inches. Ms. Sanzone asked if the other fencing on the property is being represented to be maintained. Mr. Thornley said it is going to remain as is and that repairs would be completed as needed. PUBLIC COMMENT:None. BOARD DISSCUSSION: Ms. Thompson reviewed the items for discussion, including the plantings in the right of way, the fence, drywells, and materials. Ms. Pitchford said she was a bit conflicted about the fence. She realized that it had probably been there for a while, but it is still not an original fence. She wanted to hear other member’s thoughts on the fence and the plantings that come into the right of way but was fairly certain she was not in favor of the plantings. Ms. Sanzone said she was struggling as well. She thought that the metal fence and other fencing on the property does not appear to be historic, and that they detract for the historic asset. She felt there was a lot going on on the property now and was concerned about the site and the other detailing. She was concerned about some of the hardscape materials and while she liked the concept of preserving the planting beds, she thought the plan to preserve them was not really leaving them in place but rather moving, altering areas, and replacing them. She then described a few other areas she did not feel as appropriate, including the secondary concrete walkway and the porcelain tile represented in the drawings for the patios. Mr. Halferty liked the proposal and thought it complied with the guidelines. He acknowledged that it would be a challenging process to maintain the perennials during construction. As far as the guidelines, he agreed with staff when it comes to the landscaping on a small site. He supports the project and agrees that “less is more” when it comes to landscaping. Ms. Thompson said she was struggling and agreed with Ms. Sanzone that she did not like the fences on the East and West side of the lot. She did not feel that they meet the guidelines but acknowledged that the do exist currently. She was having a hard time understanding the construction sequencing related to the fence and plantings in the front of the house. If the fence and plants can stay, she supports leaving them, but realized that would mean there would be no access for construction on the south façade. She supported Ms. Sanzone’s thoughts about the primary path being concrete and the secondary paths being secondary materials. She would support both pathways on the sides of the house being the same as the one proposed on the west side, being gravel and secondary pavers. Ms. Sanzone agreed. Ms. Thompson also agreed and wanted a description of the materials being approved added to the Resolution. She also wanted the inconsistencies in materials presented to be clarified. Mr. Moyer would encourage Ms. Sanzone to be the monitor for this project. He agreed with everything staff brought up and clarifying proposed materials in the Resolution. His main concern is that the plantings are kept simple but was ok with plantings in the right of way. 6 REGULAR MEETING HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION JUNE 8TH, 2022 Mr. Fornell had no comments. Ms. Thompson summarized the Commissioners thoughts related to the fence on Bleeker, the right of way plantings, the primary and secondary pathways, drywell cover, and summarizing and clarifying the materials. Ms. Yoon showed the draft resolution and said she could make revisions as needed. An edit was made to condition #1 to remove language related to reducing plantings in the right of way. Language was added to condition #1 to have the applicant submit an updated landscaping plan revising the primary walkway to 3 feet while removing the flare at the curb, the secondary walkways to be a different material from the primary one and the patio materials and pattern to be approved by staff and monitor. A condition was added for the existing wrought iron fence and plantings to remain in place. Another condition was added to state that if the side yard fences have to be removed, that they are replaced with ones that meet design guidelines and be approved by staff and monitor. Condition #3 was amended to include that the drywell cover be an inverted manhole cover, concealed within perennials. MOTION:Ms. Thompson moved to approve Resolution #9 Series of 2022 as shown. Mr. Halferty seconded. Roll Call vote: Ms. Pitchford, yes; Ms. Sanzone, yes; Mr. Moyer, yes; Mr. Fornell, yes; Mr. Halferty, yes; Ms. Thompson, yes. 6-0, motion passes. NEW BUSINESS: 204 S. Galena Street – Minor Development Review and Commercial Design Review, PUBLIC HEARING Applicant Presentation: Cheuk Choi – CallisonRTKL Mr. Choi began by introducing the clients from Gucci. He then went over the general site information, including location and building and tenant square footage, and the general scope of work for the project. The two existing tenant spaces are to be combined into one single tenant space, consisting of a proposed 5,444 net square feet. He went over the proposed interior renovations, but for purposes of this meeting will focus on the proposed exterior scope of work. This includes a new proposed storefront window system and entry doors, in which the existing storefront rough openings would remain, with a new proposed glazed storefront system within the existing openings. There would also be new proposed signage to be submitted under a separate permit. Next, he showed a map of the area, highlighting this project and also showed street level pictures of the current storefronts. He moved on to show and describe the existing elevations and then the proposed changes. These would include on the East Hopkins side, a new blackened metal framed glazing system. They would also like to introduce a new natural accent material in the form of a green Italian marble stone clad header and cornice. He then described the proposed elevation changes to the S. Galena side of the building. These are similar to the Hopkins side changes but would also include the storefront entry. He noted that the Building Department had provided a few comments and that they would be complyingwith them. Next, he went over in more detail the proposed recessed storefront entry bay that was needed to accommodate the ADA compliant access ramp. The ramp was necessary due to the difference in height between the sidewalk and the interior floor. The storefront renderings were then showed and described as well as the proposed materials. To add some context Mr. Choi showed the proposed interior floorplan and rendering. 7 REGULAR MEETING HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION JUNE 8TH, 2022 Ms. Sanzone asked if the windows on Hopkins, even though not “fashion” windows, would be transparent and one would be able to see into the interior of the store. Mr. Choi responded yes that only the right bay on Galena St. would be intended to be an encapsulated fashion window. Staff Presentation: Sarah Yoon – Historic Preservation Planner Ms. Yoon started by describing the details of the request for approval and why it is before the HPC board for review. The building itself is not a landmark structure, but anything with a design review within the Commercial Core is brought before HPC. She then went over the existing site context and proposed fenestration changes. She pointed out a few commercial design standards and guidelines, including #1.23 which speaks to the materials used and that they should related to the current context on the block. Staff wanted to point out that the proposed green Italian Verde Alpi Marble proposed on both the west and north elevations, is something that is not seen within the historic district and does not meet some of the description details in #1.23. Staff is recommending that this material be restudied to a different cladding that is found in the commercial core. Staff had similar concerns and recommendations related to the green tile proposed for the interior of the storefront windows. She also stated that the use of the tile in the facia pocket wall reduces the look of the overall height of the storefront window. She stated that the commercial core district focuses on heightened storefront windows at ground level and that the proposed design does minimize that look. She then discussed the proposed entry and while it does meet the minimum recess from the front façade, its overall footprint is not consistent with the context of the district. Staff is recommending restudy of this element to make it more in character with the surrounding storefront areas. She went on to talk about commercial design standard 2.11 which describes maintaining a floor to ceiling height of 12 to 15 feet and staff feels, again that the proposed design of the pocket walls in the storefront windows to distract from the overall floor to ceiling height feel and asked that that be restudied along with the tile materials. She then reviewed staff recommendations, including restudy of the entry vestibule, cladding materials and the dropdown ceiling detail in the storefront windows, all to be more contextual with other storefronts in the district. Mr. Fornell asked about the affordable housing mitigation calculations regarding commercial spaces and if it is related to the overall size of the space and the combination of two commercial units. Ms. Yoon said it does not, and that this project is accounting for the entire space. Mr. Moyer asked if the building had a basement and what the total square footage of the two units combined. Ms. Yoon said it does have a basement and Mr. Choi said the combined square footage was 5,444 square feet. PUBLIC COMMENT:None. BOARD DISSCUSSION: Ms. Thompson made a motion to extend the meeting until 7:15pm. Mr. Fornell seconded. All in favor, motion passes. Ms. Thompson reviewed what needs to be discussed related to materials and the entry vestibule. 8 REGULAR MEETING HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION JUNE 8TH, 2022 Mr. Moyer agreed with staff on the restudy but commented that this building was one of the biggest mistakes they have made and that nothing of the building relates to downtown Aspen. He went on to explain his thoughts. Mr. Fornell did not have an issue with the size of the entry but did have issue with the building being broken into two different styles. He was concerned with the conflicting styles. He also did not have issue with the perceived lower heights of the storefront windows. Mr. Halferty agreed with staff’s guidelines relating to the materials. Ms. Sanzone asked Mr. Choi is the marble materials proposed would have some type of a finish that would reduce its shine and add traction in the entry way. Mr. Choi said that the flooring marble in the entry would be honed to create texture. Ms. Sanzone wondering if the applicant knew if the material would withstand Aspen’s climate. Mr. Choi said they could also embed some slip resistant strips. Ms. Sanzone satisfied with the application as presented related to the vestibule and thought it met the guidelines. She also thought the materials could be reviewed with staff to make sure it complies with design guidelines. Ms. Pitchford did not agree with Mr. Moyer’s frustration about the building. She concurred with staff’s recommendations on the areas of restudy and had some issues with the green marble not complimenting the context of the district. Ms. Thompson did not have any issues with the form of the entry. As for the soffit height drop in the front windows, she thought that the materials fall to the interior of the building, which HPC does not have purview over. She also did not have issue with the soffit dropping down in front of the windows as she believes you would still get the appearance of the 12-foot interior space. The only thing she thought should be restudied was the marble materials on the exterior as it is not an appropriate material. Ms. Thompson reviewed members thoughts on staff’s proposed areas of restudy. As for the entry design the board was split on being ok with it or wanting restudy. Mr. Moyer said he would be ok with the proposed entry. As for the dropped soffit the board did not think it was in their purview. The board then agreed that the marble materials should be restudied. Mr. Choi asked for some clarity on what the board would be looking for when it came to different materials. Ms. Thompson thought that the design guideline relating to “neutral colors” was in question here and asked the other members for thoughts. Mr. Fornell thought the board needed to be sensitive to the applicant’s styling and branding and also to the community. He said this the building not a historic asset and it’s probably not a forever location of the applicant. He had less of an issue with the stone but agreed that a more natural product would be acceptable. Ms. Thompson thought that the proposed is so different and did not mind a natural stone as long as it was more in line with the rest of the materials seen on the building. Mr. Choi asked if the material changes could be a condition of approval in order to move forward with building permits. Ms. Thompson thought that this could be handled by staff and the monitors and that if needed could come back to the board. 9 REGULAR MEETING HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION JUNE 8TH, 2022 Ms. Yoon presented the Resolution. An additional condition was added to have exterior cladding materials be reviewed and approved with staff and monitor. MOTION:Ms. Thompson moved to approve Resolution #10 Series of 2022 as written. Mr. Moyer seconded. Roll call vote: Ms. Pitchford, yes; Ms. Sanzone, yes; Mr. Fornell, yes; Mr. Halferty, yes; Mr. Moyer, yes; Ms. Thompson, yes. 6-0, motion passes. Project monitors were then assigned. ADJOURN: Ms. Thompson motioned to adjourn. Ms. Pitchford seconded. All in favor; motion passed. ____________________ Mike Sear, Deputy City Clerk 10 REGULAR MEETING HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION JULY 13TH, 2022 Chairperson Thompson opened the meeting of the Aspen Historic Preservation Commission at 4:30pm. Commissioners in attendance: Kara Thompson Staff present: Sarah Yoon, Historic Preservation Planner Kate Johnson, Assistant City Attorney Mike Sear, Deputy City Clerk Risa Rushmore, Administrative Assistant II OLD BUSINESS: 303 S. Galena- Minor Development, SY, PUBLIC HEARING CONTINUED TO 9/28 Ms. Thompson moved to continue the Public Hearing until 9/28/2022. ADJOURN: Ms. Thompson moved to adjourn. ____________________ Mike Sear, Deputy City Clerk 11 Memorandum TO: Aspen Historic Preservation Commission FROM: Natalie Feinberg Lopez, Historic Preservation THROUGH: Natalie Feinberg Lopez, Historic Preservation MEETING DATE: July 27, 2022 RE: 312 W Hyman Ave – Final Major Development, PUBLIC HEARING APPLICANT /OWNER: POWEDERDAYSKIING LLC REPRESENTATIVE: Jeffrey Woodruff LOCATION: Street Address: 312 W Hyman Ave Legal Description: Block: 46 Lot: P AND: Lot: Q, City and Townsite of Aspen, Colorado Parcel Identification Number: PID# 2735-124-64-006 CURRENT ZONING & USE R-6 (Moderate-Density Residential); Single-family home PROPOSED ZONING & USE: No change SUMMARY: 312 W Hyman Ave is a 6000-sf lot located int he R- 6 zone district, with a property that is landmarked for its early Chalet style single family home, relatively unaltered since construction in 1956. Proposed changes include a small two- story addition at the North elevation of the house, the existing garage doors covering new glass sliders, new skylights in the roof, a refurbished chimney remaining in the original location, and a new small single car detached garage at the back. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff supports and commends the size of the project and the attention to energy efficiency and recommends approval as the project meets City of Aspen Design Guidelines for a designated landmarked structure. 312 Site Locator Map – 312 W Hyman Page 1 437 Rio Grande, Aspen, CO 81611-1975 | P: 970.920.5197 | aspen.gov 12 437 Rio Grande, Aspen, CO 81611-1975 | P: 970.920.5197 | aspen.gov BACKGROUND: 312 West Hyman is a designated Aspen Modern landmark located on a 6,000-sf lot in the R-6 zone district. The house is a classic Chalet style building, completed in 1956 and locally designated in 2006. The historic orientation of the structure is not square to the property lines but is angled to face Aspen Mountain. The site includes several large pine and spruce trees of note surrounding this property. Julius Herman Birlauf, a Swiss-born immigrant, assisted his daughter, Genevieve Birlauf Leininger, with the construction that was inspired by both Swiss and Bavarian architectural styles found in small mountain towns of the Alps. Archives include an extensive family photo collection of the phases of construction, interiors, and family gatherings on the front porch. Family letters describe influences for construction, and the network of family and friends in Aspen while located at the house, underlining the house and family as important components of the heritage of Aspen. The original home is an excellent example of Chalet style architecture associated with early ski areas and mountain tourist locations around the world. Common architectural features include a simple, low pitched roof with large overhangs, a rectangular footprint, small horizontal windows, and a large balcony that runs along the length of the façade. Often first floor has less detail, the main entrance on a secondary elevation, and a white stucco finish, with the main living area on the second floor. Post War construction of the style often added large picture window(s) in limited locations, a variation from the traditional style found in the Alps. The exterior will often have decorative shutters, fascia, and porch railings in the shape of hearts or edelweiss motifs, which can be found at the 312 West Hyman, and is part of the character that adds to its landmarked status. Fig 1: Historic image of 312 W Hyman. This image is one phase after the period of original construction, with the first remodel. Alterations include the addition of small windows on the East elevation at the first floor, a character defining feature. c 1958 Fig.2: Recent image of 312 W Hyman, note nothing has been altered on this elevation. 04/2019 When the owner of 312 W Hyman proposed demolition of important property, it was purchased by the City of Aspen and designated historic to protect a culturally significant resource. After many years of the house serving the residential needs of City employees, it was sold to the current owner. Page 2 13 Page 3 437 Rio Grande, Aspen, CO 81611-1975 | P: 970.920.5197 | aspen.gov REQUEST OF HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION (HPC) The Applicant is requesting the following land use approvals: •Major Development (Section 26.415.070.D) to add small additions to the main structure of the historic home and construct a new addition to the rear of the property. . The Historic Preservation Commission (HPC) is the final review authority; however, this project is subject to Call-up Notice by City Council. PROJECT SUMMARY: The applicant proposes: 1.Two-story addition on the North elevation proposed as additional living space 2.New glass sliders at each of the garage door openings, while keeping the garage doors intact as a type of privacy door/shutter on the South elevation. 3.South elevation attic vent will be changed to a small window, as the current ceiling will be removed to allow for the existing roof trusses to be exposed. Exterior appearance will remain the same. 4.New flush-mounted skylights to be added with light shades. 5.Refurbished chimney in the original location. 6.A new single car detached garage with roof mounted solar panels at the NW corner of the property. STAFF COMMENTS: Staff strongly supports the current plan including minimal alterations to the landmarked structure, without moving the resource or creating an extensive addition, while proposing to reduce energy consumption and making an energy efficient home. Staff also supports the small garage proposed designed to meet setback requirements and minimal tree removal. Staff recommends approval. 14 Page 4 437 Rio Grande, Aspen, CO 81611-1975 | P: 970.920.5197 | aspen.gov Staff recommends: 1. Historic Landmark –Restoration and Alterations: A preservation plan will be required for the restoration of the historic resource outlining the existing conditions and the proposed treatments. Staff fully supports the restoration of the historic resource and the removal of non-historic materials, such as the non-historic double door front entrance. Staff supports a preservation plan for the current design configuration. 2. New Garage Addition – Form, Materials and Fenestration: The proposed new addition is small, detached and significantly setback from the house while remaining within the required setbacks. The new addition has a minimal footprint and is one story, allowing the main house to remain the important structure from all vantage points. Additional information regarding materials to be reviewed during Final Review for compatibility. Staff finds the overall design of the new garage addition meets the relevant Historic Preservation Design Guidelines. 3. Site Planning and Parking: The proposed site planning respects the underlying zoning requirements for front, East side yard and rear setbacks, but the West side is historically located within the setback. A new drywell has been located on site and meets engineering requirements. All utilities conform to code and are co-located at the current utilities’ connections. An additional transformer is not required at this time. Landscaping appears to meet all criteria as identified during the HPC conceptual review. Parking is compliant with code requirements. Staff supports the location of the new garage addition and the proposed site design. REFERRAL COMMENTS: The application was referred out to other City departments who have deferred all additional review to the permit phase. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends the Historic Preservation Commission (HPC) approve this application. ATTACHMENTS: Resolution #, Series of 2022 Exhibit A – Historic Preservation Design Guidelines Criteria / Staff Findings Exhibit B – Referral Comments - none Exhibit C – Application 15 Page 1 of 13 Exhibit A.1 Historic Preservation Design Guidelines Criteria Staff Findings NOTE: Staff responses begin on page 12 of this exhibit, following the list of applicable guidelines. 26.415.070.D Major Development. No building, structure or landscape shall be erected, constructed, enlarged, altered, repaired, relocated or improved involving a designated historic property or a property located within a Historic District until plans or sufficient information have been submitted to the Community Development Director and approved in accordance with the procedures established for their review. An application for a building permit cannot be submitted without a development order. 3.Conceptual Development Plan Review b) The procedures for the review of conceptual development plans for major development projects are as follows: 1)The Community Development Director shall review the application materials submitted for conceptual or final development plan approval. If they are determined to be complete, the applicant will be notified in writing of this and a public hearing before the HPC shall be scheduled. Notice of the hearing shall be provided pursuant to Section 26.304.060.E.3 Paragraphs a, b and c. 2)Staff shall review the submittal material and prepare a report that analyzes the project's conformance with the design guidelines and other applicable Land Use Code sections. This report will be transmitted to the HPC with relevant information on the proposed project and a recommendation to continue, approve, disapprove or approve with conditions and the reasons for the recommendation. The HPC will review the application, the staff analysis report and the evidence presented at the hearing to determine the project's conformance with the City Historic Preservation Design Guidelines. 3)The HPC may approve, disapprove, approve with conditions or continue the application to obtain additional information necessary to make a decision to approve or deny. 4)A resolution of the HPC action shall be forwarded to the City Council in accordance with Section 26.415.120 - Appeals, notice to City Council, and call-up. No applications for Final Development Plan shall be accepted by the City and no associated permits shall be issued until the City Council takes action as described in said section. 16 Chapter 1: Site Planning & Landscape Design MET NOT MET 1.1 All projects shall respect the historic development pattern or context of the block, neighborhood or district. 1.4 Design a new driveway or improve an existing driveway in a manner that minimizes its visual impact. 1.5 Maintain the historic hierarchy of spaces. 1.6 Provide a simple walkway running perpendicular from the street to the front entry on residential projects. 1.7 Provide positive open space within a project site. 1.8 Consider stormwater quality needs early in the design process. 1.10 Built-in furnishings, such as water features, fire pits, grills, and hot tubs, that could interfere with or block views of historic structures are inappropriate. 1.11 Preserve and maintain historically significant landscaping on site, particularly landmark trees and shrubs. Chapter 2: Rehabilitation - Building Materials MET NOT MET 2.1 Preserve original building materials. 2.2 The finish of materials should be as it would have existed historically. 2.3 Match the original material in composition, scale and finish when replacing materials on primary surfaces. 2.4 Do not use synthetic materials as replacements for original building materials. 2.5 Covering original building materials with new materials is inappropriate. Chapter 3: Rehabilitation - Windows MET NOT MET 3.1 Preserve the functional and decorative features of a historic window. 3.2 Preserve the position, number, and arrangement of historic windows in a building wall. 3.3 Match a replacement window to the original in its design. 3.4 When replacing an original window, use materials that are the same as the original. 3.5 Preserve the size and proportion of a historic window opening. 3.6 Match, as closely as possible, the profile of the sash and its components to that of the original window. Chapter 4: Rehabilitation - Doors MET NOT MET 4.1 Preserve historically significant doors. 4.2 Maintain the original size of a door and its opening. 4.3 When a historic door or screen door is damaged, repair it and maintain its general historic appearance. 4.4 When replacing a door or screen door, use a design that has an appearance similar to the original door or a door associated with the style of the building. 4.5 Adding new doors on a historic building is generally not allowed. 4.7 Preserve historic hardware.MET MET MET MET MET CONDN MET Historic Preservation Design Guidelines Review Criteria for 312 W Hyman Ave The applicant is requesting Conceptual Major Development review for restoring the historic resource and a new above grade addition. The proposed design must meet applicable Historic Preservation Design Guidelines. MET MET MET MET MET MET MET MET MET MET MET MET MET MET MET MET MET MET MET 17 Page 3 of 13 Chapter 5: Rehabilitation - Porches & Balconies MET NOT MET 5.1 Preserve an original porch or balcony. 5.2 Avoid removing or covering historic materials and details. 5.3 Enclosing a porch or balcony is not appropriate. 5.4 If reconstruction is necessary, match the original in form, character and detail. 5.5 If new steps are to be added, construct them out of the same primary materials used on the original, and design them to be in scale with the porch or balcony 5.6 Avoid adding handrails or guardrails where they did not exist historically, particularly where visible from the street. Chapter 6: Rehabilitation - Architectural Details MET NOT MET 6.1 Preserve significant architectural features. 6.2 When disassembly of a historic element is necessary for its restoration, use methods that minimize damage to the original material. 6.3 Remove only the portion of the detail that is deteriorated and must be replaced. 6.4 Repair or replacement of missing or deteriorated features are required to be based on original designs. 6.5 Do not guess at “historic” designs for replacement parts. Chapter 7: Rehabilitation - Roofs MET NOT MET 7.1 Preserve the original form of a roof. 7.2 Preserve the original eave depth. 7.4 New vents should be minimized, carefully, placed and painted a dark color. 7.5 Preserve original chimneys, even if they are made non-functional. 7.7 Preserve original roof materials. 7.8 New or replacement roof materials should convey a scale, color and texture similar to the original. 7.10 Design gutters so that their visibility on the structure is minimized to the extent possible. Chapter 10: New Construction - Building Additions MET NOT MET 10.3 Design a new addition such that one's ability to interpret the historic character of the primary building is maintained. 10.4 The historic resource is to be the focus of the property, the entry point, and the predominant structure as viewed from the street. 10.6 Design a new addition to be recognized as a product of its own time. 10.8 Design an addition to be compatible in size and scale with the main building. 10.10 Place an addition at the rear of a primary building or set it back substantially from the front to minimize the visual impact on the historic structure and to allow the original proportions and character to remain prominent. 10.11 Roof forms shall be compatible with the historic building. 10.12 Design an addition to a historic structure that does not destroy or obscure historically important architectural features. MET MET MET MET MET MET MET MET MET MET MET MET MET MET MET MET MET MET MET MET MET MET MET MET 18 Page 4 of 13 Relevant Historic Preservation Design Guidelines: 1.1 All projects shall respect the historic development pattern or context of the block, neighborhood or district. •Building footprint and location should reinforce the traditional patterns of the neighborhood. •Allow for some porosity on a site. In a residential project, setback to setback development is typically uncharacteristic of the historic context. Do not design a project which leaves no useful open space visible from the street. 1.4 Design a new driveway or improve an existing driveway in a manner that minimizes its visual impact. •If an alley exists at the site, the new driveway must be located off it. •Tracks, gravel, light grey concrete with minimal seams, or similar materials are appropriate for driveways on Aspen Victorian properties. 1.5 Maintain the historic hierarchy of spaces. •Reflect the established progression of public to private spaces from the public sidewalk to a semi- public walkway, to a semiprivate entry feature, to private spaces. 1.6 Provide a simple walkway running perpendicular from the street to the front entry on residential projects. •Meandering walkways are not allowed, except where it is needed to avoid a tree or is typical of the period of significance. •Use paving materials that are similar to those used historically for the building style and install them in the manner that they would have been used historically. For example on an Aspen Victorian landmark set flagstone pavers in sand, rather than in concrete. Light grey concrete, brick or red sandstone are appropriate private walkway materials for most landmarks. •The width of a new entry sidewalk should generally be three feet or less for residential properties. A wider sidewalk may be appropriate for an AspenModern property. 1.7 Provide positive open space within a project site. •Ensure that open space on site is meaningful and consolidated into a few large spaces rather than many small unusable areas. •Open space should be designed to support and complement the historic building. 1.8 Consider stormwater quality needs early in the design process. •When included in the initial planning for a project, stormwater quality facilities can be better integrated into the proposal. All landscape plans presented for HPC review must include at least a preliminary representation of the stormwater design. A more detailed design must be reviewed and approved by Planning and Engineering prior to building permit submittal. •Site designs and stormwater management should provide positive drainage away from the historic landmark, preserve the use of natural drainage and treatment systems of the site, reduce the generation of additional stormwater runoff, and increase infiltration into the ground. Stormwater facilities and conveyances located in front of a landmark should have minimal visual impact when viewed from the public right of way. •Refer to City Engineering for additional guidance and requirements. 19 Page 5 of 13 1.10 Built-in furnishings, such as water features, fire pits, grills, and hot tubs, that could interfere with or block views of historic structures are inappropriate. •Site furnishings that are added to the historic property should not be intrusive or degrade the integrity of the neighborhood patterns, site, or existing historic landscape. •Consolidating and screening these elements is preferred. 1.11 Preserve and maintain historically significant landscaping on site, particularly landmark trees and shrubs. •Retaining historic planting beds and landscape features is encouraged. •Protect historically significant vegetation during construction to avoid damage. Removal of damaged, aged, or diseased trees must be approved by the Parks Department. •If a significant tree must be removed, replace it with the same or similar species in coordination with the Parks Department. •The removal of non-historic planting schemes is encouraged. •Consider restoring the original landscape if information is available, including original plant materials. 2.1 Preserve original building materials. •Do not remove siding that is in good condition or that can be repaired in place. •Masonry features that define the overall historic character, such as walls, cornices, pediments, steps and foundations, should be preserved. •Avoid rebuilding a major portion of an exterior wall that could be repaired in place. Reconstruction may result in a building which no longer retains its historic integrity. •Original AspenModern materials may be replaced in kind if it has been determined that the weathering detracts from the original design intent or philosophy. 2.2 The finish of materials should be as it would have existed historically. •Masonry naturally has a water-protective layer to protect it from the elements. Brick or stone that was not historically painted shall not be painted. •If masonry that was not painted historically was given a coat of paint at some more recent time, consider removing it, using appropriate methods. •Wood should be painted, stained or natural, as appropriate to the style and history of the building. 2.3 Match the original material in composition, scale and finish when replacing materials on primary surfaces. •If the original material is wood clapboard for example, then the replacement material must be wood as well. It should match the original in size, and the amount of exposed lap and finish. •Replace only the amount required. If a few boards are damaged beyond repair, then only those should be replaced, not the entire wall. For AspenModern buildings, sometimes the replacement of a larger area is required to preserve the integrity of the design intent. 2.4 Do not use synthetic materials as replacements for original building materials. •Original building materials such as wood siding and brick should not be replaced with synthetic materials. 2.5 Covering original building materials with new materials is inappropriate. 20 Page 6 of 13 •Regardless of their character, new materials obscure the original, historically significant material. •Any material that covers historic materials may also trap moisture between the two layers. This will cause accelerated deterioration to the historic material which may go unnoticed. 3.1 Preserve the functional and decorative features of a historic window. •Features important to the character of a window include its frame, sash, muntins/mullions, sills, heads, jambs, moldings, operations, and groupings of windows. •Repair frames and sashes rather than replacing them. •Preserve the original glass. If original Victorian era glass is broken, consider using restoration glass for the repair. 3.2 Preserve the position, number, and arrangement of historic windows in a building wall. •Enclosing a historic window is inappropriate. •Do not change the size of an original window opening. 3.3 Match a replacement window to the original in its design. •If the original is double-hung, then the replacement window must also be double-hung. If the sash has divided lights, match that characteristic as well. 3.4 When replacing an original window, use materials that are the same as the original. 3.5 Preserve the size and proportion of a historic window opening. •Changing the window opening is not permitted. •Consider restoring an original window opening that was enclosed in the past. 3.6 Match, as closely as possible, the profile of the sash and its components to that of the original window. •A historic window often has a complex profile. Within the window’s casing, the sash steps back to the plane of the glazing (glass) in several increments. These increments, which individually only measure in eighths or quarters of inches, are important details. They distinguish the actual window from the surrounding plane of the wall. •The historic profile on AspenModern properties is typically minimal. 4.1 Preserve historically significant doors. •Maintain features important to the character of a historic doorway. These include the door, door frame, screen door, threshold, glass panes, paneling, hardware, detailing, transoms and flanking sidelights. •Do not change the position and function of original front doors and primary entrances. •If a secondary entrance must be sealed shut, any work that is done must be reversible so that the door can be used at a later time, if necessary. Also, keep the door in place, in its historic position. •Previously enclosed original doors should be reopened when possible. 21 Page 7 of 13 4.2 Maintain the original size of a door and its opening. •Altering its size and shape is inappropriate. It should not be widened or raised in height. 4.3 When a historic door or screen door is damaged, repair it and maintain its general historic appearance. 4.4 When replacing a door or screen door, use a design that has an appearance similar to the original door or a door associated with the style of the building. •A replica of the original, if evidence exists, is the preferred replacement. •A historic door or screen door from a similar building also may be considered. •Simple paneled doors were typical for Aspen Victorian properties. •Very ornate doors, including stained or leaded glass, are discouraged, unless photographic evidence can support their use. 4.5 Adding new doors on a historic building is generally not allowed. •Place new doors in any proposed addition rather than altering the historic resource. •Greater flexibility in installing a door in a new location may be considered on rear or secondary walls. •A new door in a new location should be similar in scale and style to historic openings on the building and should be a product of its own time. •Preserve the historic ratio of openings to solid wall on a façade. Significantly increasing the openings on a character defining façade negatively affects the integrity of a structure. 4.7 Preserve historic hardware. •When new hardware is needed, it must be in scale with the door and appropriate to the style of the building. •On Aspen Victorian properties, conceal any modern elements such as entry keypads. 5.1 Preserve an original porch or balcony. •Replace missing posts and railings when necessary. Match the original proportions, material and spacing of balusters. •Expanding the size of a historic porch or balcony is inappropriate. 5.2 Avoid removing or covering historic materials and details. •Removing an original balustrade, for example, is inappropriate. 5.3 Enclosing a porch or balcony is not appropriate. •Reopening an enclosed porch or balcony is appropriate. 5.4 If reconstruction is necessary, match the original in form, character and detail. •Match original materials. 22 Page 8 of 13 •When reconstructing an original porch or balcony without historic photographs, use dimensions and characteristics found on comparable buildings. Keep style and form simple with minimal, if any, decorative elements. 5.5 If new steps are to be added, construct them out of the same primary materials used on the original, and design them to be in scale with the porch or balcony •Steps should be located in the original location. •Step width should relate to the scale of entry doors, spacing between posts, depth of deck, etc. •Brick, red sandstone, grey concrete, or wood are appropriate materials for steps. 5.6 Avoid adding handrails or guardrails where they did not exist historically, particularly where visible from the street. •If handrails or guardrails are needed according to building code, keep their design simple in character and different from the historic detailing on the porch or balcony. 6.1 Preserve significant architectural features. •Repair only those features that are deteriorated. •Patch, piece-in, splice, or consolidate to repair the existing materials, using recognized preservation methods whenever possible. •On AspenModern properties, repair is preferred, however, it may be more important to preserve the integrity of the original design intent, such as crisp edges, rather than to retain heavily deteriorated material. 6.2 When disassembly of a historic element is necessary for its restoration, use methods that minimize damage to the original material. •Document its location so it may be repositioned accurately. Always devise methods of replacing the disassembled material in its original configuration. 6.3 Remove only the portion of the detail that is deteriorated and must be replaced. •Match the original in composition, scale, and finish when replacing materials or features. •If the original detail was made of wood, for example, then the replacement material should be wood, when feasible. It should match the original in size and finish. 6.4 Repair or replacement of missing or deteriorated features are required to be based on original designs. •The design should be substantiated by physical or pictorial evidence to avoid creating a misrepresentation of the building’s heritage. •When reconstruction of an element is impossible because there is no historical evidence, develop a compatible new design that is a simplified interpretation of the original, and maintains similar scale, proportion and material. 6.5 Do not guess at “historic” designs for replacement parts. 23 Page 9 of 13 •Where scars on the exterior suggest that architectural features existed, but there is no other physical or photographic evidence, then new features may be designed that are similar in character to related buildings. •Using ornate materials on a building or adding new conjectural detailing for which there is no documentation is inappropriate. 7.1 Preserve the original form of a roof. •Do not alter the angle of a historic roof. Preserve the orientation and slope of the roof as seen from the street. •Retain and repair original and decorative roof detailing. •Where the original roof form has been altered, consider restoration. 7.2 Preserve the original eave depth. •Overhangs contribute to the scale and detailing of a historic resource. •AspenModern properties typically have very deep or extremely minimal overhangs that are key character defining features of the architectural style. • 7.3 Minimize the visual impacts of skylights and other rooftop devices. •Skylights and solar panels are generally not allowed on a historic structure. These elements may be appropriate on an addition. 7.4 New vents should be minimized, carefully, placed and painted a dark color. •Direct vents for fireplaces are generally not permitted to be added on historic structures. •Locate vents on non-street facing facades. •Use historic chimneys as chases for new flues when possible. 7.5 Preserve original chimneys, even if they are made non-functional. •Reconstruct a missing chimney when documentation exists. 7.7 Preserve original roof materials. •Avoid removing historic roofing material that is in good condition. When replacement is necessary, use a material that is similar to the original in both style as well as physical qualities and use a color that is similar to that seen historically. 7.8 New or replacement roof materials should convey a scale, color and texture similar to the original. •If a substitute is used, such as composition shingle, the roof material should be earth tone and have a matte, non-reflective finish. •Flashing should be in scale with the roof material. •Flashing should be tin, lead coated copper, galvanized or painted metal and have a matte, non- reflective finish. •Design flashing, such as drip edges, so that architectural details are not obscured. 24 Page 10 of 13 •A metal roof is inappropriate for an Aspen Victorian primary home but may be appropriate for a secondary structure from that time period. •A metal roof material should have a matte, non-reflective finish and match the original seaming. 7.10 Design gutters so that their visibility on the structure is minimized to the extent possible. •Downspouts should be placed in locations that are not visible from the street if possible, or in locations that do not obscure architectural detailing on the building. •The material used for the gutters should be in character with the style of the building. 10.3 Design a new addition such that one’s ability to interpret the historic character of the primary building is maintained. •A new addition must be compatible with the historic character of the primary building. •An addition must be subordinate, deferential, modest, and secondary in comparison to the architectural character of the primary building. •An addition that imitates the primary building’s historic style is not allowed. For example, a new faux Victorian detailed addition is inappropriate on an Aspen Victorian home. •An addition that covers historically significant features is inappropriate. •Proposals on corner lots require particular attention to creating compatibility. 10.4 The historic resource is to be the focus of the property, the entry point, and the predominant structure as viewed from the street. •The historic resource must be visually dominant on the site and must be distinguishable against the addition. •The total above grade floor area of an addition may be no more than 100% of the above grade floor area of the original historic resource. All other above grade development must be completely detached. HPC may consider exceptions to this policy if two or more of the following are met: o The proposed addition is all one story o The footprint of the new addition is closely related to the footprint of the historic resource and the proposed design is particularly sensitive to the scale and proportions of the historic resource o The project involves the demolition and replacement of an older addition that is considered to have been particularly detrimental to the historic resource o The interior of the resource is fully utilized, containing the same number of usable floors as existed historically o The project is on a large lot, allowing the addition to have a significant setback from the street o There are no variance requests in the application other than those related to historic conditions that aren’t being changed o The project is proposed as part of a voluntary AspenModern designation, or o The property is affected by non-preservation related site-specific constraints such as trees that must be preserved, Environmentally Sensitive Areas review, etc. 10.6 Design a new addition to be recognized as a product of its own time. •An addition shall be distinguishable from the historic building and still be visually compatible with historic features. 25 Page 11 of 13 •A change in setbacks of the addition from the historic building, a subtle change in material, or a modern interpretation of a historic style are all techniques that may be considered to help define a change from historic construction to new construction. •Do not reference historic styles that have no basis in Aspen. •Consider these three aspects of an addition; form, materials, and fenestration. An addition must relate strongly to the historic resource in at least two of these elements. Departing from the historic resource in one of these categories allows for creativity and a contemporary design response. •Note that on a corner lot, departing from the form of the historic resource may not be allowed. •There is a spectrum of appropriate solutions to distinguishing new from old portions of a development. Some resources of particularly high significance or integrity may not be the right instance for a contrasting addition. 10.8 Design an addition to be compatible in size and scale with the main building. •An addition that is lower than, or similar to the height of the primary building, is preferred. 10.9 If the addition is taller than a historic building, set it back from significant façades and use a “connector” to link it to the historic building. •Only a one-story connector is allowed. •Usable space, including decks, is not allowed on top of connectors unless the connector has limited visibility and the deck is shielded with a solid parapet wall. •In all cases, the connector must attach to the historic resource underneath the eave. •The connector shall be a minimum of 10 feet long between the addition and the primary building. •Minimize the width of the connector. Ideally, it is no more than a passage between the historic resource and addition. The connector must reveal the original building corners. The connector may not be as wide as the historic resource. •Any street-facing doors installed in the connector must be minimized in height and width and accessed by a secondary pathway. See guideline 4.1 for further information. 10.10 Place an addition at the rear of a primary building or set it back substantially from the front to minimize the visual impact on the historic structure and to allow the original proportions and character to remain prominent. •Locating an addition at the front of a primary building is inappropriate. •Additions to the side of a primary building are handled on a case-by-case basis and are approved based on site specific constraints that restrict rear additions. •Additional floor area may also be located under the building in a basement which will not alter the exterior mass of a building. 10.11 Roof forms shall be compatible with the historic building. •A simple roof form that does not compete with the historic building is appropriate. •On Aspen Victorian properties, a flat roof may only be used on an addition to a gable roofed structure if the addition is entirely one story in height, or if the flat roofed areas are limited, but the addition is primarily a pitched roof. 10.12 Design an addition to a historic structure that does not destroy or obscure historically important architectural features. •Loss or alteration of architectural details, cornices, and eave lines must be avoided. 26 Staff Finding: The applicable sections of the design guidelines are as follows: site planning, building materials, windows, doors, roofs, porches, building additions, accessibility, architectural lighting, and mechanical equipment. All relevant Design Guidelines in Chapter 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 10 and 12 related to the preservation plan need to be reviewed in detail as part of the permit submittals. These chapters will be conditions of final approval. Site and Landscape: Design Guideline 1.6, 1.8, & 1.10 are specific guidelines regarding the site issues needing review. 1.6 reviews the entrance, is about the prominence of the historic resource as it relates to the historic entry of the home. The guidelines state that the historic entrance of the historic home as a key character defining feature, and maintaining its true function is expected. The current entrance is not the original entrance path, but HPC ruled at conceptual that this guideline needs flexibility for the mid-century modern structure. In addition to a detailed preservation plan, HPC has address the historic resource in the form of gutters, curb heights, landscape materials, path lighting, diminished driveway options, and other similar features. All the features need to be compatible with historic features, and located in areas with the least visual impact when viewing the historic resource. The application includes a secondary entry at the North elevation to accommodate entry from the new garage, which meets the design guidelines. Storm water mitigation has been addressed, and all additional site features associated with it as stated in 1.8. Staff recommends approval. . Exterior Elements: Design Guidelines 2.1, 2.2, 2.3, 2.5 and 6.1 address proposed changes in the exterior materials on the historic structure. Areas of new construction may have new siding, but original materials must not be covered or altered. Staff recommends approval. Windows and Doors: Design Guidelines 2.1, 3.1-3.6 and 4.5 address the various issues with historic window and door removal, replacement, and changes to the opening size and location on the historic structure. Historic windows must be retained as character defining features, and on landmarked structures missing historic elements must be restored. The historic shutters are a character defining features, critical both to the Chalet style and to the specific historic resource. The shutters are expected to be retained, with any missing shutters to be restored. If any additional design elements, such as original decorative fascia boards, balusters, etc. are found to be damaged or missing, these would also be expected to be restored to the original configuration and match materials in kind as stated by criteria 2.1. Door changes are called out in criterial 4.5, requiring original doors to remain doors, and any new doors to be part of additions. All windows, doors, and proposed new penetrations are to match the preservation guidelines. Staff recommends approval. Page 12 of 13 27 Roof: Design Guidelines 7.3, 7.5, 7.7 and 7.10 address the roof, chimney, gutters, and downspouts. 7.3 criteria require skylights and solar panels to be located on additions, new construction, and secondary structures. HPC gave permission for the new skylights in the historic roof during Conceptual Review. Other new roof penetrations are to be limited to vents and flues, commonly combined at one point of penetration whenever possible. While historic chimneys are protected, new chimneys are not encouraged as they are highly visible changing the character of the roof and cause an addition large roof penetration. The more roof alterations, the more loss of historic materials that are critical to the landmarked structure’s integrity. Roof trusses are considered part of the exterior and are thus protected, as are all exterior walls and foundations. Staff finds the design meets the relevant design guidelines. New Garage Addition: Design Guidelines 10.4- 10.12 are relevant to the proposed addition of the one car garage, located off the alleyway. It is designed to be compatible in size/scale with the historic home. It has a minimal footprint and the design strikes a balance between contemporary and historic features with both form and materials. Fenestration does not match the design of the Chalet style of the main house. Staff finds the design of the new addition to be appropriate and in compliance with relevant design guidelines. In addition, please review Chapter 12 of the design guidelines when designating locations for all utilities, lighting, etc. These details will need to be part of the Major Conceptual design, while aspects may be allowed to be reviewed at final or in the field, such as final specifications for fixtures and materials. In summary, staff recommends approval. Page 13 of 13 28 Exhibit B Referral Comments NO NEW COMMENTS (All Items Addressed at Conceptual) Engineering Parks Zoning Building Engineering Department Comments Wyatt Young HPC Refferal Project 312 W Hyman All comments have been addressed: 1.For Major redevelopment all ROW needs to be brought into compliance. 2.Remove railroad ties and existing driveway. 3.New access needs to be off of the alleyway. 4.Sidewalk needs to be installed along W. Hyman. Parks Department Comments David Radeck HPC Referral Project 312 W Hyman All comments have been addressed: Tree protection measures will be required at the driplines of trees and no activity whatsoever is allowed within this area without the express written consent of the City Forester or his designee. Zoning Department Comments Sophie Varga HPC Referral Project 312 W Hyman All comments have been addressed: 1.Provide a zoning summary sheet. 2.Provide a compliant survey – requirements can be found here: 1. https://www.cityofaspen.com/DocumentCenter/View/516/Compliant-COA-Survey-PDF 2.Lot size: Per the survey provided, the lot is 5,976 SF (gross). The application states that the lot size is 6,000 SF (gross). Please update this number to accurately reflect the gross lot size wherever it is listed. The site coverage requirements are not triggered due to the size of the lot. 3. Setbacks: a.The minimum distance between detached buildings on the lot is applicable. Please show the 5’ setback between the detached buildings. b.The combined side yard setback is 15’ with a 5’ minimum size for each side yard. A variation for the combined side yard setback requirement needs to be requested. Please amend the application to reflect this. It appears that the proposed condition will be a combined side yard setback of ~5’. The combined side yard setback is not staggered. Please refer to 26.575.020(e)(4).29 c.The deck is projecting further into the east side yard setback than the structure. Please update the application to reflect this non-conforming condition. d.The garage is shown as meeting the 5’ side yard setback and 5’ rear yard setback. Why is a variance requested for a 0’ setback on the western property line? 4.Provide demolition calculations. 5. Parking: a.Only one parking space is provided; two are required. How will the second parking space be provided? 6.Floor Plans: Please clearly label existing and proposed plans. 7.The hot tub shown on the second story deck is between a street and a structure. This is prohibited per 26.575.020(e)(m). Please remove the hot tub from the street facing deck. 8.Elevations: Please update the scale and refer to the Residential Zoning Checklist. 9.Floor area calculations: Please refer to the resources linked above for guidance on what is required for floor area calculations. Please reach out if you have any questions. I cannot verify existing or proposed floor area at this time. 10.Roof plan: please provide an existing roof plan. 11.Exterior lighting: is any exterior lighting proposed? If so, please provide a plan showing the exterior lighting locations as well as the cutsheets of proposed lights. Building Department Comments Bonnie Muhigirwa HPC Referral Project 312 W Hyman All comments have been addressed: 1.New exterior walls less than 5 feet from the property line will require 1-hour fire-resistance rating. (2015 IRC Table R302.1) 2.Hot tub on 2nd story deck will need to be set back at least 18 inches from the edge of the deck or the guardrail will need to be extended 18 inches above the edge of the spa per City of Aspen policy. https://www.cityofaspen.com/DocumentCenter/View/6202/Hot-Tub-and- Spa-Safety-Railings 30 Land Use Application City of Aspen Historic Preservation Commission 27 July 2022 Final Location:312 W. Hyman Avenue, Aspen, CO (PID# 273512464006) An application for Major Development to remodel an AspenModern designated residence and provide a detached garage. Represented By: Prepared by:Jeffrey Woodruff, for PowderDaySkiing, LLC Cloud Hill Design, LLC Travis Terry Design Crystal River Civil, LLC Escape Garden Design, LLC 31 TABLE OF CONTENTS              312 W. Hyman Avenue / HPC Major Development (PID# 273512464006) 27 July 2022 Project Overview and Code Response Attachment 2 – HPC Land Use Application Attachment 3 – Vicinity Map & Property Description Attachment 4 – Site Context Attachment 5 – HPC Dimensional Requirements Attachment 6 – Homeowners Association Compliance Form Attachment 7 – Existing Conditions Survey Attachment 8 – Residential Design Standard Checklist Attachment 9 – Proof of Ownership Attachment 10 – Architectural Plans & Renderings Attachment 11 – Pre-Application Conference Summary Attachment 12 – Letter of Authorization and Representation Attachment 13 – Pitkin County Mailing list of 300 Feet Radius 32   Page | 3 312 W. Hyman Avenue / HPC Major Development (PID# 273512464006) 27 July 2022 PROJECT OVERVIEW This application is submitted on behalf of POWDERDAYSKIING LLC (the “Applicant”) for the property located at 312 W. Hyman Avenue, Aspen, Colorado, Parcel ID# 273512464006 (the “Property”). The Applicant seeks Major Development approval to remodel the existing AspenModern historically designated single-family residence, provide a detached garage, and make improvements to the landscape to enhance the visual characteristics of the historic resource. This application is submitted in conformance with the Pre-application Conference Summary dated 23 August 2021. An initial conceptual design review was held on 26 January 2022, presented by the applicant and a representative for the applicant. The application was publicly noticed. Final conceptual review was presented on 27 April 2022, continuing the conceptual design, with direction from the HPO and HPC on restudying the fenestration, elevations, landscaping, grading and lighting with respect to historic context and the promotion of the chalet style in Aspen. The application was publicly noticed. Final HPC review is scheduled for 27 July 2022. The applicant’s response and presentation on the 27th July 2022 are in accordance with City of Aspen Historic Preservation Design Guidelines per section 26.415.070.D.3.b2 and 3 of the Municipal Code and other applicable Code Sections. The applicant’s response and presentation on the 27th July 2022 are in accordance with the adoption of HPC Resolution #5, Series of 2022 and representations made by the applicant, the applicants representatives and staff at the 27th day of April, 2022 HPC regular meeting. The final HPC was publicly noticed on Friday, 10 June 2022. Images and notarized documentation are available for the posting and 300’ mailing. Property Background The Property survey for Lots P + Q Block 46 is located in the Medium-Density Residential (R-6), as per Sec. 26.710.040. Per the R-6, maximum allowable floor area is 3,240 SF for single-family residence (Allowable Floor Area for Single-Family Residence, applies to conforming and nonconforming lots of record). The existing residence contains approximately 1,669 SF of floor area. Based on this, approximately 1,571 SF of additional floor area could potentially be added. The existing single-family residence construction was completed in 1956 and is a representation of the “Chalet” style of architecture in Aspen. The house was constructed by Genevieve Birlauf Leininger and Julius Herman Birlauf. The Birlauf’s would arrive by rail to Aspen, their arrival noticed in the The Aspen Times and the Aspen Daily Times and the Rocky Mountain Sun in the 1950’s and 1960’s. The Aspen Times chronicled their travels to Aspen, Arkansas, Massachusetts and California. JH Birlauf on one trip traveled 5000 miles and visited 16 cities. Genevieve married Joseph Leininger, who served with the Department of Defense in Vienna through 1955. The single family house has seen several rounds of exterior modifications by the Birlauf family, primarily consisting of fenestration modifications, new drainage additions and irrigation and water punctures to the envelope and slab. The Property was historically designated in 2006 and the City of Aspen considers the existing residence to be an excellent example of the Chalet style of architecture which was commonly associated with early ski areas in the United States. The Property has had three owners. Genevieve sold the Property in 1986 to Jordan “Jordie” Gerberg. Jordie sold the Property to the City of Aspen at which time the Property was historically designated. Ordinance No. 45, Series of 2006 Designated 312 West Hyman Avenue, Lots P and Q, Block 46 City and Townsite of Aspen, Colorado to the Landmark to the Aspen Inventory of Historic Landmark and Sites and Structures During the City’s ownership, interior remodeling has occurred, including the addition of a new kitchen on the ground floor, replacement, or repair of exterior features such as decks and patios, and a new roof and gutters added. The Applicant purchased 312 West Hyman Avenue, Lots P and Q, Block 46 (Property) from the City. Proposed Remodel, consistent with Historic Preservation Design Guidelines The Applicant wishes to update and provide improvements to the existing residence, in order to function more appropriately and comfortably for his family. The history as a family home and the story of the construction of the residence was an important factor in the purchase of the Property and the Applicant looks forward to ensuring this AspenModern resource is preserved and lived in for many years to come, while further respecting the historic character of the structure and its relationship to the site and landscape. 33   Page | 4 312 W. Hyman Avenue / HPC Major Development (PID# 273512464006) 27 July 2022 Following are the proposed modifications to be made to the residence: •A small two-story addition on the north façade is proposed to provide additional seating, storage, and living space; inspired by Hotel Post, remaining in the building footprint, under the existing the North and East eaves. Hotel Post features in Friedel Pfeifer’s autobiography and Pfeifer credits the Austrian Chalet’s influence in Aspen building design. •A new wrap-around deck on the northeastern corner of the residence will allow additional outdoor access. •A new entry on the west facade, using the existing rough opening, matching the historic divided light windows (a main entry door and sidelights). •Removal of the dropped ceiling, exposing the cold roof and providing energy updates (batt insulation, removal of the cold attic), removal of the attic vents and replacement with operable fenestration (no change in visual appearance on the North or South Facades, as the Romeo and Juliet balcony is untouched). •New windows are proposed to be installed throughout the residence which will enhance thermal performance and energy efficiency and allow more light into the interior of the residence; Infrared photography demonstrates the current performance of the single- pane leaky sieves; leading both the poor thermal performance and excess moisture potentially speeding up decay of the sills and building envelope. •Six narrow (new) flush-mounted skylights (~12-28” x 34-36”) with operable light monitored shades (Velux, either blackout or light filtering shades to prevent vertical light pollution to higher elevation neighbors) will be added to the roof to provide light to the upper level living space; •The remaining garage space on the ground level will be converted to bedrooms; habitable spaces to capture the views of Shadow Mountain; people over automobiles. Today there is one garage space and one false garage door, both spaces will be converted to habitable spaces. •A new detached garage with roof mounted solar, energy storage and ski storage and trash enclosure will be located immediately off of the (North) alley; a permeable surface to connect the alley and the new garage; •The client has agreed to a 5’ sidewalk on the south extent of the property and/or to sign a sidewalk agreement. The applicant will work with the HPO on the details required to traverse the historic driveway, maintaining the character of the angled approach and its relationship to the structure. The HPO and applicant, as well as the City Forester and Parks, remain concerned about the tree drip zone of the blue spruce (South of the structure), the existing historic driveway alignment and the need for a hardscape/sidewalk- when the neighboring parcels are head-in 90 degree parking hardscape. •Air spading in order to protect the remaining conifers on the North property line in conjunction with the City Forester and City Parks. Removal of Tree #1 (good shape) and Tree #2 (fair shape, would be removed with Tree #2). •The blue spruce, due South of the chalet, will be added to the historic register (protected). •New landscaping and outdoor gathering areas will be provided to compliment the historic resource. It is not anticipated that REMP fees will be due for the remodel. A hot tub less than 64 square feet will be installed in the North backyard. The ground level will contain two habitable spaces bedrooms and the upper level one habitable space (three bedrooms total). The new addition on the north (not visible from the South or orthogonal view from \West Hyman) and east façades will “tuck” under the existing eaves, be minimally visible, and blend into the chalet-style architecture. The fenestration is designed to match the existing divided light patterns, and the rough openings are consistent with the fenestration pattern of the historic resource. A new interior staircase will replace the basement like stair approach today, with a code standard rise-run and landing. With the relocation of the garage, the existing mechanical and garage space on the ground level of the residence will be converted to bedrooms. The existing garage doors, will be maintained visually and historically. They will be converted to allow outdoor access from the two of the bedrooms on the ground level and provide for code required egress from the new bedrooms. Sliding glass doors will be placed behind the woo garage doors. Therefore, the historic use pattern of vehicular access directly off of Hyman Avenue will still be recognized and appreciated by passing pedestrians. 34   Page | 5 312 W. Hyman Avenue / HPC Major Development (PID# 273512464006) 27 July 2022 The new detached garage located in the North East corner of the with entry off of the alley, meeting City of Aspen Residential Design Standards, will provide parking for a single vehicle. (The same as the existing use pattern). The garage will contain storage and incorporate a trash enclosure. A second off-street space will be provided via the existing south driveway (remaining permeable). The applicant will use permeable materials, such as gravel, connecting the alley to the single car garage, and in accordance with the site requirements of the City Forester. The landscape will feature a rustic, mountain aesthetic evocative of an alpine setting. A two-track driveway will be maintained and employed to recall the historic vehicular use of the front yard while also minimizing the impacts of vehicles parked in front of the historic resource. Vehicles will still be able to use the two-track for parking. A rustic steppingstone path will provide access to the front door, to the West of the current driveway and blue spruce, connecting the askew residence to the street. Garden areas employing a native alpine plant palette will provide visual interest and help ground the historic resource. A private exterior patio space will be provided in the northeastern corner of the rear yard, hidden from view from the street, to take advantage of the southern exposure and views to Aspen Mountain. The landscaping will observe Fire Wise construction techniques, creating a defensible space to the residence, avoiding wood chips and keeping branches (working with the City Forester and City Parks) away from the residence. Variance for side yard setback was granted at Conceptual as per Resolution #6, Series of 2022 A side yard setback variance has been granted for the detached garage as per Resolution #6, Series of 2022. The City of Aspen, Zoning in the R-6 zone district is for a combined fifteen foot setback (is the code today). The existing askew primary residence is 2.4’ from the property boundary and the deck overhang is even less compliant with the current land use code. The proposed detached garage is five feet from the North, residential design standard -five foot rear setback (is met), and five feet from the West property lines (five foot side setback, but not compliant with today’s land use code in the R-6 zone district). We are proposing locating the garage and trash enclosure at 5’ from the West property line. 312 West Hyman was granted a variance for the 15’ combined side yard setback for the for the purpose of constructing a garage. Floor Area The proposed additions represent a very small amount of additional floor area. The garage contains a total of 308 SF. Utilizing the garage exemptions for a detached garage located off of alley, 29 SF of the garage will contribute to floor area. The two additions to the north and east façades will add square footage as per the Zoning Sheets, 48 square feet to the north on the main floor and 64 feet on the second level, and 39 to the east on the main floor. The new proposed decks, with the existing deck space included, represent 311 + 52 (new deck to the North East) for a total of 363 SF which is less than the 15% of maximum floor area allowed exempt from floor area (486 SF = 3,240 * .15). Planning a Preservation Project The Applicant appreciates the efforts to date by the Historic Preservation Commission, Historic Preservation Officer and the City of Aspen’s departments in connection with the proposed remodel and protection and preservation of this Aspen Historic resource. Summary The owner is responsible for both the benefits accrued to the historic character of the resource and its beautiful setting. The owner wishes to improve the artifacts in need of restoration and enhance the character and livability of the historic resource. 35 CCity of Aspen Community Development Department Aspen Historic Preservation Land Use Packet City of Aspen | 130 S. Galena Street. | (970) 920 5090 Historic Land Use Application Requirements, Updated: March, 2020 ATTACHMENT 2 - Historic Preservation Land Use Application  PROJECT: APPLICANT: Name: Address: Phone #: Fax#: E-mail: REPRESENTATIVE: Name: Address: Phone #: Fax#: E-mail: TYPE OF APPLICATION: (please check all that apply): EXISTING CONDITIONS: (description of existing buildings, uses, previous approvals, etc.) PROPOSAL: (description of proposed buildings, uses, modifications, etc.) Name: Location: (Indicate street address, lot & block number or metes and bounds description of property) Parcel ID # (REQUIRED) … Historic Designation … Certificate of No Negative Effect Certificate of Appropriateness … Minor Historic Development … Major Historic Development … Conceptual Historic Development … Final Historic Development … Relocation (temporary, on or off-site) … Demolition (total demolition) … Substantial Amendment … Historic Landmark Lot Split 312 W. Hyman Major Development, Historic Preservation Benefits 312 W. Hyman Avenue, Aspen, CO 273512464006 POWDERDAYSKIING LLC, David Tarrab, Managing Member PO BOX 10261, Aspen, CO 81612 david.tarrab@grupottt.net X X The Applicant proposes to remodel the house to provide for the creation of more functional spaces. A single car garage is proposed to be constructed which will be accessed off of the alley. Exterior enhancements are proposed. The property consists of a 6,000 SF lot in the R-6 zone district. An AspenModern designated chalet style home occupies the site. Jeffrey H. Woodruff, AIA, NCARB, LEED AP, Cloud Hill Design, LLC 266 Light Hill Rd, Snowmass, CO 81654 jeffrey@cloudhilldesign.com 36 301 301 301 301 301 301 301 301 315 232 232 232 232 232 232 232 232 237 334 300 322 312 334 LP PD LP PD W HY M A N A V ES 2ND STS 2ND STS 2ND STW HY M A N A V E Geographic Information Systems This map/drawing/image is a graphical representation of the features depicted and is not a legal representation. The accuracy may change depending on the enlargement or reduction. Copyright 2021 City of Aspen GIS 0 0.01 0.020 mi When printed at 8.5"x11" 4 Legend Urban Growth Boundary (UGB) Emissions Inventory Boundary (EIB) City of Aspen Greenline 8040 Stream Margin Hallam Bluff ESA Historic Sites Historic Districts Parcels Zone Overlay DRAINAGE LP PD DRAIN/TRANS GCS PD L PD LP PD Roads Zoomed In Scale: 1:731 312 W. Hyman Avenue 37 Pitkin County, CO Log In Search Layers Map Search Advanced Search Sales Search Advanced Results Sales List Results Sales Results Report Home Page Sale date range: View Map POWDERDAYSKIING LLC PO BOX 10261 ASPEN CO 81612 Building #1 Building Type COA AVERAGE (DEP 06) Property Class POL SUB RES IMPS Architectural Style 2 STORY Stories 2 Frame WOOD FRAME Actual Year Built 1956 Effective Year Built 1990 Wood Balcony 64 Wood Deck 253 First Floor 678 Second Floor 858 Total Heated SqFt 1,536 Unfinished Garage 434 Bedrooms 3 Baths 2 Heating Fuel GAS Heating Type HT WTR B/B Air Conditioning NONE Roof Type GABLE/HIP Roof Cover ASP SHINGL Construction Quality AVERAGE Exterior Wall WOOD SD GO FRM STUCCO Interior Wall WD PANEL Floor CARPET Neighborhood WEST OF CORE SOUTH OF MAIN Super Neighborhood CITY OF ASPEN Assessed Year 2021 2020 2019 2018 Land Actual $3,200,000.00 $3,200,000.00 $3,200,000.00 $3,200,000.00 Improvement Actual $718,800.00 $718,800.00 $718,800.00 $718,800.00 Total Actual $3,918,800.00 $3,918,800.00 $3,918,800.00 $3,918,800.00 Assessed Year 2021 2020 2019 2018 Land Assessed $228,800.00 $928,000.00 $928,000.00 $928,000.00 Improvement Assessed $51,400.00 $208,450.00 $208,450.00 $208,450.00 Total Assessed $280,200.00 $1,136,450.00 $1,136,450.00 $1,136,450.00 Click here to view the tax information for this parcel on the Pitkin County Treasurer's website. Sale Date Deed Type Reception Number Book - Page Sale Price 5/26/2021 SPECIAL WARRANTY DEED 676992 $3,960,000 3/12/2007 WARRANTY DEED 535360 $3,500,000 10/15/1986 WARRANTY DEED 282416 520-891 $195,000 From:10/12/2016 To:10/12/2021 Sales by Neighborhood Sales by Subdivision 1500 Feet Sales by Distance No data available for the following modules:Extra Features. ✉ Summary Account R000145 Parcel 273512464006 Property Address 312 W HYMAN AVE, ASPEN, CO 81611 Legal Description Subdivision: CITY AND TOWNSITE OF ASPEN Block: 46 Lot: P AND:- Lot: Q Property Type RESIDENTIAL Acres 0 Land SqFt 6,000 Tax Area 1 Mill Levy 36.025 Subdivision CITY AND TOWNSITE OF ASPEN Neighborhood WEST OF CORE SOUTH OF MAIN Super Neighborhood CITY OF ASPEN Owners Land Unit Type POL SUB RES LAND Land Size Acres 0 Land Size SqFt 6,000 Buildings Actual Values Columns  Assessed Values Columns   Sales Columns  Recent Sales In Area Photos Map View Information Pitkin County, CO 530 E. Main St. Suite #204 Aspen, CO 81611 https://pitkincounty.com Assessor Deb Bamesberger 970-920-5160 County Treasurer Link Email County Treasurer (970) 920-5170 Clerk & Recorder Reception Search Announcements Access & Accessibility Disclaimer NEW VIDEOS - How to use Map Tools Search across multiple counties Version 2.3.151 Pitkin County presents the information and data on this web site as a service to the public. Every effort has been made to ensure that the information and data contained in this electronic system is accurate, but the accuracy may change. Pitkin County makes no warranty or guarantee concerning the completeness, accuracy, or reliability of the content at this site or at other sites to which we link. Assessing accuracy and reliability of information and data is the sole responsibility of the user. View full version User Privacy Policy GDPR Privacy Notice Last Data Upload: 10/12/2021, 4:46:12 AM Developed by  search... 38 Attachment 4 312 W Hyman St Moritz Skating Rink 39 City of Aspen Community Development Department Aspen Historic Preservation Land Use Packet City of Aspen | 130 S. Galena Street. | (970) 920 5090 Historic Land Use Application Requirements, Updated: March, 2020 ATTACHMENT 3 - Dimensional Requirements Form (Item #10 on the submittal requirements key. Not necessary for all projects.) Project: Applicant: Project Location: Zone District: Lot Size: Lot Area: (For the purposes of calculating Floor Area, Lot Area may be reduced for areas within the high-water mark, easements, and steep slopes. Please refer to the definition of Lot Area in the Municipal Code.) Commercial net leasable: Existing: Proposed: Number of residential units: Existing: Proposed: _______________________________ Proposed % of demolition: ____________________________________% DIMENSIONS: (write N/A where no requirement exists in the zone district) Floor Area: Height Principal Bldg.: Existing: Allowable: Proposed: Accessory Bldg.: Existing: Allowable: Proposed: On-Site parking: Existing: Required: Proposed: % Site coverage: Existing: Required: Proposed: % Open Space: Existing: Required: Proposed: Front Setback: Existing: Required: Proposed: Rear Setback: Existing: Required: Proposed: Combined Front/Rear: Indicate N, S, E, W Existing: Required: Proposed: _______________ Side Setback: Existing: Required: Side Setback: Existing: Required: Combined Sides: Existing: Required: Distance between buildings Existing: Required: Proposed: Existing non-conformities or encroachments and note if encroachment licenses have been issued: Variations requested (identify the exact variances needed): 312 W. Hyman Major Development, Historic Benefits POWDERDAYSKIING LLC 312 W. Hyman Avenue, Aspen, CO R-6 6,000 SF6,000 SF 1 1 0 18’-3”18’-3”25’ 2 2 23%50%29% 10’, 15’20’20’ 10’, 5’5’ (garage)32’ 11’ w 2.4’ e 5’ 13.4’ Existing driveway encroaches on property to east. Eastern side yard setback. Non-orthogonal orientation. Existing: 1,869 SF Allowable: 3,240 SF Proposed: 2,191 SF +/- Combined Side Yard Setback granted at Conceptual as per Resolution #6, Series of 2022 7.5’ Proposed: 11’ w Proposed: 2.4’ e Proposed: 7.5’ 40 April 2020 City of Aspen|130 S. Galena St.|(970) 920 5090 CITY OF ASPEN COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT Homeowner Association Compliance Policy All land use applications within the City of Aspen are required to include a Homeowner Association Compliance Form (this form) certifying that the scope of work included in the land use application complies with all applicable covenants and homeowner association policies. The certification must be signed by the property owner or Attorney representing the property owner. Property Owner (“I”): Name: Email: Phone No.: Address of Property: (subject of application) I certify as follows: (pick one) □This property is not subject to a homeowner association or other form of private c ovenant. □This property is subject to a homeowner association or private covenant, and the improvements proposed in this land use application do not require approval by the homeowners association or covenant beneficiary. □This property is subject to a homeowners association or private covenant and the improvements proposed in this land use application have been approved by the homeowners a ssociation or covenant beneficiary. I understand this policy and I understand the City of Aspen does not interpret, enforce, or manage the applicability, meaning or effect of private covenants or homeowner association rules or bylaws. I understand that this document is a public document. Owner signature: Date: Owner printed name: or, Attorney signature: Date: Attorney printed name: POWDERDAYSKIING LLC, David Tarrab, Managing Member david.tarrab@grupottt.net 312 W. Hyman Avenue, Aspen, CO X David Tarrab, Managing Member 41 (S75°11'09"E 60.00') S75°14'58"E 58.59'(N14°50'49"E 100.00')N15°05'12"E 99.90' S14°50'49"W 100.00'N75°09'11"W 60.00'BASIS OF BEARINGSFOUND NO. 5 REBARFOUND NO. 5 REBARFOUND NO. 5 REBARSET FOUND NO. 5 REBAR &1-1/4" ORANGE PLASTIC CAPPROP CORNER TNC PLS38215(20.90' WIDE)GRAVEL ALLEYALLEY - BLOCK 46LOT PLOT QLOT OLOT NLOT RLOT SW. HYMAN AVENUE(74.80' WIDE PUBLIC)SE CORNERBLOCK 46FOUND REBAR & 1-1/2"ALUMINUM CAP(NO STAMPING)N75°09'11"W 59.92'(60.00')33.4'4.0'4.9'8.3'5.5'11.5'0.7'0.7'2.2'0.8'0.7'0.7'0.8'2.2'9.2'0.8'0.8'38.4'21.2'7.2'11.1'(TIE)19.8'(TIE)0.8'2.4'(TIE)13.4'5.5'APPARENTENCROACHMENTDRIVEWAY &WOOD RETAININGGRAVELDRIVEWAYWOOD RETAINI N G WOOD RETAINI N G APPARENTENCROACHMENTR.R.TIE WALLCONCRETE APRONUPPERDECKSTEPSFLAGSTONEPATIOSIDEWALK2 - STORYFRAME HOUSE312 WEST HYMAN AVENUE5976± SQ.FT.NEIGHBORING RESIDENCECONCRETE CURB & GUTTERPAVED ROADWAYMAILBOX4.4'APPARENTENCROACHMENTWOOD RETAININGELECTRIC PEDESTALCATV PEDESTALTELEPHONE PEDESTALGAS METERELECTRICAL METERGLEGENDESURVEYOR'S CERTIFICATIONSURVEY NOTES:LOTS P & Q - BLOCK 46, CITY AND TOWNSITE OF ASPEN SECTION 12, TOWNSHIP 10 SOUTH, RANGE 85 WEST OF THE 6TH PMCOUNTY OF PITKIN, STATE OF COLORADOIMPROVEMENT SURVEY PLAT TRUE NORTH COLORADO LLC.#.#0&5748';+0)#0&/#22+0)%1/2#0;21$1:59+.&*145'&4+8'0'9%#56.'%1.14#&1  YYYVTWGPQTVJEQNQTCFQEQODATE: JANUARY 18, 2019DRAWNRPKSURVEYEDLDV8'4'16'SCALE: 1" = 8'PROPERTY DESCRIPTION:0SCHEDULE B PART II TITLE EXCEPTIONS:42 Residential Design Standards Administrative Compliance Review Applicant Checklist4JOHMF'BNJMZBOE%VQMFY Standard Complies Alternative Compliance N/A Sheet #(s)/Notes B.1.Articulation of Building Mass (Non-exible) B.2.Building Orientation (Flexible) B.3.Build-to Requirement (Flexible) B.4.One Story Element (Flexible) C.1.Garage Access (Non-exible) C.2.Garage Placement (Non-exible) C.3.Garage Dimensions (Flexible) Instructions: Please ll out the checklist below, marking whether the proposed design complies with the applicable standard as written or is requesting Alternative Compliance (only permitted for Flexible standards). Also include the sheet #(s) demonstrating the applicable standard. If a standard does not apply, please mark N/A and include in the Notes section why it does not apply. If Alternative Compliance is requested for a Flexible standard, include in the Notes section how the proposed design meets the intent of the standard(s). Additional sheets/graphics may be attached. Disclaimer: is application is only valid for the attached design. If any element of the design subject to Residential Design Standards changes prior to or during building permit review, the applicant shall be required to apply for a new Administrative Compliance Review. Address: Parcel ID: Zone District/PD: Representative: Email: Phone: Page 1 of 2 43 Standard Complies Alternative Compliance N/A Sheet #(s)/Notes C.4.Garage Door Design (Flexible) D.1.Entry Connection (Non-exible) D.2.Door Height (Flexible) D.3.Entry Porch (Flexible) E.1.Principle Window (Flexible) E.2.Window Placement (Flexible) E.3.Nonorthogonal Window Limit (Flexible) E.4.Lightwell/Stairwell Location (Flexible) E.5.Materials (Flexible) Disclaimer: is application is only valid for the attached design. If any element of the design subject to Residential Design Standards changes prior to or during building permit review, the applicant shall be required to apply for a new Administrative Compliance Review. Page 2 of 2 Residential Design Standards Administrative Compliance Review Applicant Checklist4JOHMF'BNJMZBOE%VQMFY 44 This page is only a part of a 2016 ALTA® Commitment for Title Insurance issued by First American Title Insurance Company. This Commitment is not valid without the Notice; the Commitment to Issue Policy; the Commitment Conditions; Schedule A; Schedule B, Part I—Requirements; Schedule B, Part II—Exceptions; and a counter-signature by the Company or its issuing agent that may be in electronic form. Copyright 2006-2016 American Land Title Association. All rights reserved. The use of this Form (or any derivative thereof) is restricted to ALTA licensees and ALTA members in good standing as of the date of use. All other uses are prohibited. Reprinted under license from the American Land Title Association. Form 5030000 (1-31-17)Page 1 of 16 ALTA Commitment for Title Insurance (8-1-16) ALTA Commitment for Title Insurance ISSUED BY First American Title Insurance Company Commitment COMMITMENT FOR TITLE INSURANCE Issued By FIRST AMERICAN TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY NOTICE IMPORTANT—READ CAREFULLY: THIS COMMITMENT IS AN OFFER TO ISSUE ONE OR MORE TITLE INSURANCE POLICIES. ALL CLAIMS OR REMEDIES SOUGHT AGAINST THE COMPANY INVOLVING THE CONTENT OF THIS COMMITMENT OR THE POLICY MUST BE BASED SOLELY IN CONTRACT. THIS COMMITMENT IS NOT AN ABSTRACT OF TITLE, REPORT OF THE CONDITION OF TITLE, LEGAL OPINION, OPINION OF TITLE, OR OTHER REPRESENTATION OF THE STATUS OF TITLE. THE PROCEDURES USED BY THE COMPANY TO DETERMINE INSURABILITY OF THE TITLE, INCLUDING ANY SEARCH AND EXAMINATION, ARE PROPRIETARY TO THE COMPANY, WERE PERFORMED SOLELY FOR THE BENEFIT OF THE COMPANY, AND CREATE NO EXTRACONTRACTUAL LIABILITY TO ANY PERSON, INCLUDING A PROPOSED INSURED. THE COMPANY’S OBLIGATION UNDER THIS COMMITMENT IS TO ISSUE A POLICY TO A PROPOSED INSURED IDENTIFIED IN SCHEDULE A IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE TERMS AND PROVISIONS OF THIS COMMITMENT. THE COMPANY HAS NO LIABILITY OR OBLIGATION INVOLVING THE CONTENT OF THIS COMMITMENT TO ANY OTHER PERSON. COMMITMENT TO ISSUE POLICY Subject to the Notice; Schedule B, Part I—Requirements; Schedule B, Part II—Exceptions; and the Commitment Conditions,First American Title Insurance Company, a Colorado Corporation (the "Company"), commits to issue the Policy according to the terms and provisions of this Commitment. This Commitment is effective as of the Commitment Date shown in Schedule A for each Policy described in Schedule A, only when the Company has entered in Schedule A both the specified dollar amount as the Proposed Policy Amount and the name of the Proposed Insured. If all of the Schedule B, Part I—Requirements have not been met within six months after the Commitment Date, this Commitment terminates and the Company’s liability and obligation end. First American Title Insurance Company If this jacket was created electronically, it constitutes an original document. 45 This page is only a part of a 2016 ALTA® Commitment for Title Insurance issued by First American Title Insurance Company. This Commitment is not valid without the Notice; the Commitment to Issue Policy; the Commitment Conditions; Schedule A; Schedule B, Part I—Requirements; Schedule B, Part II—Exceptions; and a counter-signature by the Company or its issuing agent that may be in electronic form. Copyright 2006-2016 American Land Title Association. All rights reserved. The use of this Form (or any derivative thereof) is restricted to ALTA licensees and ALTA members in good standing as of the date of use. All other uses are prohibited. Reprinted under license from the American Land Title Association. Form 5030000 (1-31-17)Page 2 of 16 ALTA Commitment for Title Insurance (8-1-16) COMMITMENT CONDITIONS 1. DEFINITIONS (a) "Knowledge" or "Known": Actual or imputed knowledge, but not constructive notice imparted by the Public Records. (b) "Land": The land described in Schedule A and affixed improvements that by law constitute real property. The term "Land" does not include any property beyond the lines of the area described in Schedule A, nor any right, title, interest, estate, or easement in abutting streets, roads, avenues, alleys, lanes, ways, or waterways, but this does not modify or limit the extent that a right of access to and from the Land is to be insured by the Policy. (c) "Mortgage": A mortgage, deed of trust, or other security instrument, including one evidenced by electronic means authorized by law. (d) "Policy": Each contract of title insurance, in a form adopted by the American Land Title Association, issued or to be issued by the Company pursuant to this Commitment. (e) "Proposed Insured": Each person identified in Schedule A as the Proposed Insured of each Policy to be issued pursuant to this Commitment. (f) "Proposed Policy Amount": Each dollar amount specified in Schedule A as the Proposed Policy Amount of each Policy to be issued pursuant to this Commitment. (g) "Public Records": Records established under state statutes at the Commitment Date for the purpose of imparting constructive notice of matters relating to real property to purchasers for value and without Knowledge. (h) "Title": The estate or interest described in Schedule A. 2. If all of the Schedule B, Part I—Requirements have not been met within the time period specified in the Commitment to Issue Policy, this Commitment terminates and the Company’s liability and obligation end. 3. The Company’s liability and obligation is limited by and this Commitment is not valid without: (a) the Notice; (b) the Commitment to Issue Policy; (c) the Commitment Conditions; (d) Schedule A; (e) Schedule B, Part I—Requirements; (f) Schedule B, Part II—Exceptions; and (g) a counter-signature by the Company or its issuing agent that may be in electronic form. 4. COMPANY’S RIGHT TO AMEND The Company may amend this Commitment at any time. If the Company amends this Commitment to add a defect, lien, encumbrance, adverse claim, or other matter recorded in the Public Records prior to the Commitment Date, any liability of the Company is limited by Commitment Condition 5. The Company shall not be liable for any other amendment to this Commitment. 5. LIMITATIONS OF LIABILITY (a) The Company’s liability under Commitment Condition 4 is limited to the Proposed Insured’s actual expense incurred in the interval between the Company’s delivery to the Proposed Insured of the Commitment and the delivery of the amended Commitment, resulting from the Proposed Insured’s good faith reliance to: (i) comply with the Schedule B, Part I—Requirements; (ii) eliminate, with the Company’s written consent, any Schedule B, Part II—Exceptions; or (iii) acquire the Title or create the Mortgage covered by this Commitment. (b) The Company shall not be liable under Commitment Condition 5(a) if the Proposed Insured requested the amendment or had Knowledge of the matter and did not notify the Company about it in writing. (c) The Company will only have liability under Commitment Condition 4 if the Proposed Insured would not have incurred the expense had the Commitment included the added matter when the Commitment was first delivered to the Proposed Insured. 46 This page is only a part of a 2016 ALTA® Commitment for Title Insurance issued by First American Title Insurance Company. This Commitment is not valid without the Notice; the Commitment to Issue Policy; the Commitment Conditions; Schedule A; Schedule B, Part I—Requirements; Schedule B, Part II—Exceptions; and a counter-signature by the Company or its issuing agent that may be in electronic form. Copyright 2006-2016 American Land Title Association. All rights reserved. The use of this Form (or any derivative thereof) is restricted to ALTA licensees and ALTA members in good standing as of the date of use. All other uses are prohibited. Reprinted under license from the American Land Title Association. Form 5030000 (1-31-17)Page 3 of 16 ALTA Commitment for Title Insurance (8-1-16) (d) The Company’s liability shall not exceed the lesser of the Proposed Insured’s actual expense incurred in good faith and described in Commitment Conditions 5(a)(i) through 5(a)(iii) or the Proposed Policy Amount. (e) The Company shall not be liable for the content of the Transaction Identification Data, if any. (f) In no event shall the Company be obligated to issue the Policy referred to in this Commitment unless all of the Schedule B, Part I—Requirements have been met to the satisfaction of the Company. (g) In any event, the Company’s liability is limited by the terms and provisions of the Policy. 6. LIABILITY OF THE COMPANY MUST BE BASED ON THIS COMMITMENT (a) Only a Proposed Insured identified in Schedule A, and no other person, may make a claim under this Commitment. (b) Any claim must be based in contract and must be restricted solely to the terms and provisions of this Commitment. (c) Until the Policy is issued, this Commitment, as last revised, is the exclusive and entire agreement between the parties with respect to the subject matter of this Commitment and supersedes all prior commitment negotiations, representations, and proposals of any kind, whether written or oral, express or implied, relating to the subject matter of this Commitment. (d) The deletion or modification of any Schedule B, Part II—Exception does not constitute an agreement or obligation to provide coverage beyond the terms and provisions of this Commitment or the Policy. (e) Any amendment or endorsement to this Commitment must be in writing and authenticated by a person authorized by the Company. (f) When the Policy is issued, all liability and obligation under this Commitment will end and the Company’s only liability will be under the Policy. 7. IF THIS COMMITMENT HAS BEEN ISSUED BY AN ISSUING AGENT The issuing agent is the Company’s agent only for the limited purpose of issuing title insurance commitments and policies. The issuing agent is not the Company’s agent for the purpose of providing closing or settlement services. 8. PRO-FORMA POLICY The Company may provide, at the request of a Proposed Insured, a pro-forma policy illustrating the coverage that the Company may provide. A pro-forma policy neither reflects the status of Title at the time that the pro-forma policy is delivered to a Proposed Insured, nor is it a commitment to insure. 9. ARBITRATION The Policy contains an arbitration clause. All arbitrable matters when the Proposed Policy Amount is $2,000,000 or less shall be arbitrated at the option of either the Company or the Proposed Insured as the exclusive remedy of the parties. A Proposed Insured may review a copy of the arbitration rules at http://www.alta.org/arbitration. 47 This page is only a part of a 2016 ALTA® Commitment for Title Insurance issued by First American Title Insurance Company. This Commitment is not valid without the Notice; the Commitment to Issue Policy; the Commitment Conditions; Schedule A; Schedule B, Part I—Requirements; Schedule B, Part II—Exceptions; and a counter-signature by the Company or its issuing agent that may be in electronic form. Copyright 2006-2016 American Land Title Association. All rights reserved. The use of this Form (or any derivative thereof) is restricted to ALTA licensees and ALTA members in good standing as of the date of use. All other uses are prohibited. Reprinted under license from the American Land Title Association. Form 5033708-A (4-9-18)Page 4 of 16 ALTA Commitment for Title Insurance (8-1-16) Colorado - Schedule A ALTA Commitment for Title Insurance ISSUED BY First American Title Insurance Company Schedule A Transaction Identification Data for reference only: Issuing Agent:Winter Van Alstine Issuing Office:Attorneys Title Insurance Agency of Aspen, LLC Issuing Office's ALTA® Registry ID: 1019587 Loan ID No.: Commitment No.:20004656 Issuing Office File No.:20004656 Property Address:312 West Hyman Avenue, Aspen, CO 81611 SCHEDULE A 1. Commitment Date: May 18, 2021 at 07:45 AM 2. Policy or Policies to be issued: Amount Premium A. ALTA Owners Policy (06/17/06)$3,960,000.00 $7,208.00 Proposed Insured:Powderdayskiing, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company Certificate of Taxes Due $25.00 Endorsements: CO-110.1 (Delete 1, 2, 3, 4)$75.00 Additional Charges:$0 Total $7,308.00 3. The estate or interest in the land described or referred to in this Commitment is Fee simple. 4. The Title is, at the Commitment Date, vested in: City of Aspen, a Colorado, a home rule municipal corporation 5. The land referred to in the Commitment is described as follows: SEE EXHIBIT A ATTACHED HERETO For informational purposes only, the property address is: 312 West Hyman Avenue, Aspen, CO 81611. 48 SCHEDULE A (Continued) This page is only a part of a 2016 ALTA® Commitment for Title Insurance issued by First American Title Insurance Company. This Commitment is not valid without the Notice; the Commitment to Issue Policy; the Commitment Conditions; Schedule A; Schedule B, Part I—Requirements; Schedule B, Part II—Exceptions; and a counter-signature by the Company or its issuing agent that may be in electronic form. Copyright 2006-2016 American Land Title Association. All rights reserved. The use of this Form (or any derivative thereof) is restricted to ALTA licensees and ALTA members in good standing as of the date of use. All other uses are prohibited. Reprinted under license from the American Land Title Association. Form 5033708-A (4-9-18)Page 5 of 16 ALTA Commitment for Title Insurance (8-1-16) Colorado - Schedule A Attorneys Title Insurance Agency of Aspen, LLC By: Winter Van Alstine Authorized Officer or Agent FOR INFORMATION PURPOSED OR SERVICES IN CONNECTION WITH THIS COMMITMENT, CONTACT: Attorneys Title Insurance Agency of Aspen, LLC, 715 West Main Street, Suite 202, Aspen, CO 81611, Phone: 970 925-7328, Fax: 970 925-7348. 49 This page is only a part of a 2016 ALTA® Commitment for Title Insurance issued by First American Title Insurance Company. This Commitment is not valid without the Notice; the Commitment to Issue Policy; the Commitment Conditions; Schedule A; Schedule B, Part I—Requirements; Schedule B, Part II—Exceptions; and a counter-signature by the Company or its issuing agent that may be in electronic form. Copyright 2006-2016 American Land Title Association. All rights reserved. The use of this Form (or any derivative thereof) is restricted to ALTA licensees and ALTA members in good standing as of the date of use. All other uses are prohibited. Reprinted under license from the American Land Title Association. Form 5030008-BI&BII (5-18-17)Page 6 of 16 ALTA Commitment for Title Insurance (8-1-16) Colorado - Schedule BI & BII ALTA Commitment for Title Insurance ISSUED BY First American Title Insurance Company Schedule BI & BII Commitment No: 20004656 SCHEDULE B, PART I Requirements All of the following Requirements must be met: 1. The Proposed Insured must notify the Company in writing of the name of any party not referred to in this Commitment who will obtain an interest in the Land or who will make a loan on the Land. The Company may then make additional Requirements or Exceptions. 2. Pay the agreed amount for the estate or interest to be insured. 3. Pay the premiums, fees, and charges for the Policy to the Company. 4. Documents satisfactory to the Company that convey the Title or create the Mortgage to be insured, or both, must be properly authorized, executed, delivered, and recorded in the Public Records. 5. Payment of all taxes and assessments now due and payable as shown on a certificate of taxes due from the County Treasurer or the County Treasurer's Authorized Agent. 6. Evidence that all assessments for common expenses, if any, have been paid. 7. Final Affidavit and Agreement executed by Owners and/or Purchasers must be provided to the Company 8. Special Warranty Deed must be sufficient to convey the fee simple estate or interest in the land described or referred to herein, from the City of Aspen, Colorado, a home rule municipal corporation, to Powderdayskiing, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company, the proposed insured, Schedule A, item 2A. NOTE: C.R.S. Section 38-35-109(2) requires that a notation of the purchaser's legal address, (not necessarily the same as the property address) be included on the face of the Deed to be recorded. 9. Full disclosure from Seller, of any monetary liens and open Deeds of Trust of record. If you have any knowledge of an outstanding obligation secured by the subject property, you must contact us immediately for further review prior to closing. 10. Record a Statement of Authority to provide prima facie evidence of existence of Powderdayskiing, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company, an entity capable of holding property, and the name of the person authorized to execute instruments affecting title to real property as authorized by C.R.S. Section 38-30-172. 11. Certificate of Good Standing from the Colorado Secretary of State for Powderdayskiing, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company. 50 ALTA Commitment for Title Insurance ISSUED BY First American Title Insurance Company Schedule BI & BII (Cont.) Form 50-CO-Disclosure (4-1-16)Page 7 of 16 Disclosure Statement (5-1-15) Colorado 12. Certificate of Good Standing from the Delaware Secretary of State for Powderdayskiing, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company. 13. A copy of the properly signed and executed Operating Agreement if written, for Powderdayskiing, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company, to be submitted to the Company for review. 14. A true copy of the Resolution of the City Council authorizing the sale of the land described in Schedule A and naming the person(s) authorized to execute transaction documents, must be furnished to the Company prior to closing. 15. Survey Affidavit sufficient in form, content and certification acceptable to the Company. Exception will be taken to adverse matters disclosed thereby. 16. This Title Commitment is subject to underwriter approval. 51 This page is only a part of a 2016 ALTA® Commitment for Title Insurance issued by First American Title Insurance Company. This Commitment is not valid without the Notice; the Commitment to Issue Policy; the Commitment Conditions; Schedule A; Schedule B, Part I—Requirements; Schedule B, Part II—Exceptions; and a counter-signature by the Company or its issuing agent that may be in electronic form. Copyright 2006-2016 American Land Title Association. All rights reserved. The use of this Form (or any derivative thereof) is restricted to ALTA licensees and ALTA members in good standing as of the date of use. All other uses are prohibited. Reprinted under license from the American Land Title Association. Form 5030008-BI&BII (5-18-17)Page 8 of 16 ALTA Commitment for Title Insurance (8-1-16) Colorado - Schedule BI & BII ALTA Commitment for Title Insurance ISSUED BY First American Title Insurance Company Schedule BI & BII (Cont.) Commitment No.: 20004656 SCHEDULE B, PART II Exceptions THIS COMMITMENT DOES NOT REPUBLISH ANY COVENANT, CONDITION, RESTRICTION, OR LIMITATION CONTAINED IN ANY DOCUMENT REFERRED TO IN THIS COMMITMENT TO THE EXTENT THAT THE SPECIFIC COVENANT, CONDITION, RESTRICTION, OR LIMITATION VIOLATES STATE OR FEDERAL LAW BASED ON RACE, COLOR, RELIGION, SEX, SEXUAL ORIENTATION, GENDER IDENTITY, HANDICAP, FAMILIAL STATUS, OR NATIONAL ORIGIN. The Policy will not insure against loss or damage resulting from the terms and provisions of any lease or easement identified in Schedule A, and will include the following Exceptions unless cleared to the satisfaction of the Company: 1. Any facts, rights, interests or claims which are not shown by the Public Records, but which could be ascertained by an inspection of the Land or by making inquiry of persons in possession thereof. 2. Easements, or claims of easements, not shown by the Public Records. 3. Discrepancies, conflicts in boundary lines, shortage in area, encroachments, and any facts which a correct land survey and inspection of the Land would disclose, and which are not shown by the Public Records. 4. Any lien, or right to a lien, for services, labor or material theretofore or hereafter furnished, imposed by law and not shown in the Public Records. 5. Any defect, lien, encumbrance, adverse claim, or other matter that appears for the first time in the Public Records or is created, attaches, or is disclosed between the Commitment Date and the date on which all of the Schedule B, Part I—Requirements are met. Note: Exception number 5. will be removed from the policy provided the Company conducts the closing and settlement service for the transaction identified in the commitment 6. Any and all unpaid taxes, assessments and unredeemed tax sales. 7. Unpatented mining claims; reservations or exceptions in patents or in Acts authorizing the issuance thereof. 8. Any water rights, claims of title to water, in, on or under the Land. 9. Taxes and assessments for the year 2021, and subsequent years, a lien not yet due or payable. 52 ALTA Commitment for Title Insurance ISSUED BY First American Title Insurance Company Schedule BI & BII (Cont.) Form 50-CO-Disclosure (4-1-16)Page 9 of 16 Disclosure Statement (5-1-15) Colorado 10. Exceptions and reservations as set forth in the Act authorizing the issuance of the Patent for the City and Townsite of Aspen, dated January 29, 1897 and recorded March 1, 1897 in Book 139 at Page 216 as Reception No. 060156. 11. Terms, conditions, provisions, agreements and obligations specified under An Ordinance Accepting a Map Entitled "Official Map of the City of Aspen, Pitkin County, State of Colorado," as the Official Map of the City of Aspen: Providing for Dedication of all streets and alleys, Except such streets and alleys heretofore vacated: and providing for the filing of said map, field notes, and Suppmental Plats with the Clerk and Recorder for Pitkin County (Ordinance No. 6, Series of 1959) dated November 16, 1959, and recorded December 18, 1959, as Reception No. 109043. 12. Any and all notes, easements and recitals as disclosed on the recorded Official Map of the City of Aspen, recorded December 16, 1959, as Reception No. 109023. 13. Any and all notes, easements and recitals as disclosed on the Willets Map recorded November 12, 1969 in Plat Book 4 at Page 27 as Reception No. 137902. 14. Terms, conditions, provisions, agreements and obligations specified under Ordinance No. 45 (Series of 2006) recorded March 28, 2007, as Reception No. 535861. 15. Any and all notes, encroachments, easements and recitals as disclosed on the Improvement & Topographic Survey Plat dated February 1, 2019, and recorded January 29, 2020, in Plat Book 127 at Page 40 as Reception No. 662367, including but not limited to the gravel driveway and wood retaining wall onto Lot R. 16. Any existing leases or tenancies, and any and all parties claiming by, through or under said lessees. 53 Form 5000000-EX (7-1-14)Page 10 of 16 Exhibit A ALTA Commitment for Title Insurance ISSUED BY First American Title Insurance Company Exhibit A File No.: 20004656 The Land referred to herein below is situated in the County of Pitkin, State of Colorado, and is described as follows: Lots P and Q, Block 46, City and Townsite of Aspen, Pitkin County, Colorado. 54 Form 50-CO-Disclosure (4-1-16)Page 11 of 16 Disclosure Statement (5-1-15) Colorado DISCLOSURE STATEMENT Pursuant to C.R.S. 30-10-406(3)(a) all documents received for recording or filing in the Clerk and Recorder’s office shall contain a top margin of at least one inch and a left, right and bottom margin of at least one-half of an inch. The Clerk and Recorder will refuse to record or file any document that does not conform to the requirements of this section. NOTE: If this transaction includes a sale of the property and the price exceeds $100,000.00, the seller must comply with the disclosure/withholding provisions of C.R.S. 39-22-604.5 (Nonresident withholding). NOTE: Colorado Division of Insurance Regulations 8-1-2 requires that “Every title insurance company shall be responsible to the proposed insured(s) subject to the terms and conditions of the title commitment, other than the effective date of the title commitment, for all matters which appear of record prior to the time of recording whenever the title insurance company, or its agent, conducts the closing and settlement service that is in conjunction with its issuance of an owner’s policy of title insurance and is responsible for the recording and filing of legal documents resulting from the transaction which was closed. Pursuant to C.R.S. 10-11-122, the company will not issue its owner’s policy or owner’s policies of title insurance contemplated by this commitment until it has been provided a Certificate of Taxes due or other equivalent documentation from the County Treasurer or the County Treasurer’s authorized agent; or until the Proposed Insured has notified or instructed the company in writing to the contrary. The subject property may be located in a special taxing district. A Certificate of Taxes due listing each taxing jurisdiction shall be obtained from the County Treasurer or the County Treasurer’s authorized agent. Information regarding special districts and the boundaries of such districts may be obtained from the Board of County Commissioners, the County Clerk and Recorder, or the County Assessor. NOTE: Pursuant to CRS 10-11-123, notice is hereby given: This notice applies to owner’s policy commitments containing a mineral severance instrument exception, or exceptions, in Schedule B, Section 2. A. That there is recorded evidence that a mineral estate has been severed, leased, or otherwise conveyed from the surface estate and that there is a substantial likelihood that a third party holds some or all interest in oil, gas, other minerals, or geothermal energy in the property; and B. That such mineral estate may include the right to enter and use the property without the surface owner’s permission. NOTE: Pursuant to Colorado Division of Insurance Regulations 8-1-2, Affirmative mechanic’s lien protection for the Owner may be available (typically by deletion of Exception no. 4 of Schedule B, Section 2 of the Commitment from the Owner’s Policy to be issued) upon compliance with the following conditions: A. The land described in Schedule A of this commitment must be a single family residence which includes a condominium or townhouse unit. B. No labor or materials have been furnished by mechanics or material-men for purposes of construction on the land described in Schedule A of this Commitment within the past 6 months. C. The Company must receive an appropriate affidavit indemnifying the Company against un-filed mechanic’s and material-men’s liens. D. The Company must receive payment of the appropriate premium. E. If there has been construction, improvements or major repairs undertaken on the property to be purchased within six months prior to the Date of the Commitment, the requirements to obtain coverage for unrecorded liens will include: disclosure of certain construction information; financial information as to the seller, the builder and or the contractor; payment of the appropriate premium, fully executed Indemnity Agreements satisfactory to the company, and, any additional requirements as may be necessary after an examination of the aforesaid information by the Company. No coverage will be given under any circumstances for labor or material for which the insured has contracted for or agreed to pay. 55 Form 50-CO-Disclosure (4-1-16)Page 12 of 16 Disclosure Statement (5-1-15) Colorado NOTE: Pursuant to C.R.S. 38-35-125(2) no person or entity that provides closing and settlement services for a real estate transaction shall disburse funds as a part of such services until those funds have been received and are available for immediate withdrawal as a matter of right. NOTE: C.R.S. 39-14-102 requires that a real property transfer declaration accompany any conveyance document presented for recordation in the State of Colorado. Said declaration shall be completed and signed by either the grantor or grantee. NOTE: Pursuant to CRS 10-1-128(6)(a), It is unlawful to knowingly provide false, incomplete, or misleading facts or information to an insurance company for the purpose of defrauding or attempting to defraud the company. Penalties may include imprisonment, fines, denial of insurance and civil damages. Any insurance company or agent of an insurance company who knowingly provides false, incomplete, or misleading facts or information to a policyholder or claimant for the purpose of defrauding or attempting to defraud the policyholder or claimant with regard to a settlement or award payable from insurance proceeds shall be reported to the Colorado division of insurance within the department of regulatory agencies. NOTE: Pursuant to Colorado Division of Insurance Regulations 8-1-3, notice is hereby given of the availability of an ALTA Closing Protection Letter which may, upon request, be provided to certain parties to the transaction identified in the commitment. Nothing herein contained will be deemed to obligate the company to provide any of the coverages referred to herein unless the above conditions are fully satisfied. 56 TELEPHONE 970 925-7328 FACSIMILE 970 925-7348 ATTORNEYS TITLE INSURANCE AGENCY OF ASPEN, LLC 715 West Main Street, Suite 202 Aspen, CO 81611 Attorneys Title Insurance Agency of Aspen, LLC Privacy Policy Notice PURPOSE OF THIS NOTICE Title V. of the Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act (GLBA) generally prohibits any financial institution, directly or through it affiliates, from sharing non-public personal information about you with a nonaffiliated third party unless the institution provides you with a notice of its privacy policies and practices, such as the type of information that it collects about you and the categories of persons or entities to whom it may be disclosed. In compliance with the GLBA, we are providing you with this document, which notifies you of the privacy policies and practices of Attorneys Title Insurance Agency of Aspen, LLC. We may collect nonpublic personal information about you from the following sources: Information we receive from you, such as on application or other forms. Information about your transactions we secure from out files, or from our affiliates or others. Information we receive from a consumer reporting agency. Information that we receive from others involved in your transaction, such as the real estate agent or lender. Unless it is specifically stated otherwise in an amended Privacy Policy Notice, no additional nonpublic personal information will be collected about you. We may disclose any of the above information that we collect about our customers or former customer to our affiliates or to nonaffiliated third parties as permitted by law. We also may disclose this information about our customers or former customers to the following types of nonaffiliated companies that perform marketing services on our behalf or with whom we have joint marketing agreements: Financial service providers such as companies engaged in banking, consumer finance, securities and insurance. Non-financial companies such as envelope stuffers and other fulfillment service providers. WE DO NOT DISCLOSE ANY NONPUBLIC PERSONAL INFORMATION ABOUT YOU WITH ANYONE FOR ANY PURPOSE THAT IS NOT SPECIFICALLY PERMITTED BY LAW. We restrict access to nonpublic personal information about you to those employees who need to know that information in order to provide products or services to you. We maintain physical, electronic, and procedural safeguards that comply with federal regulations to guard your nonpublic personal information. 57 58 59 60 SHEET TITLE INTEGRATED DESIGN TEAM PROJECT NO: MODEL FILE: DRAWN BY: COPYRIGHT: SHEET 1 A001 Jeffrey H Woodruff 312_W_Hyman_06102022.pln Project No. 116 /Users/jeffrey/Documents/Cloud Hill/312 06 22/312_W_Hyman_06102022.plnPowder Day Skiiing, LLC, David A Tarrab Mees Cover Sheet 312 W Hyman Ave 312 W Hyman Ave Lots P+Q, Block 46 Aspen CO 81611 USA/ Pitkin County UGB, City of Aspen 312 W Hyman Ave Aspen CO 81611 USA Account # R000145 Parcel ID # 273512464006 Landscape Architect Jennifer M. Dolecki-Smith, RLA Escape Garden Design, LLC Interior Design Travis Terry Travis Terry Design Contractor (At Final) Structural Engineer (As per contractor) Civil Grading and Drainage Jay Engstrom, P.E. Crystal River Civil, LLC Jeffrey H. Woodruff AIA, LEED AP Cloud Hill Design, LLC Snowmass Snowmass CO 81654 USA SHEET INDEX A001 V1 V2 C1 L100 Z001 Z002 Z003 Z004 Z005 Z006 Z008 A101 A102 A103 A104 A105 A106 A107 A108 SD21 SD22 A200 A201 A203 A204 A210 A211 A300 A301 A500 A501 A600 A700 A900 A903 E100 Cover Sheet Improvement Survey Topographic Survey Plat Civil Site Grading and Drainage Landscape Architecture Floor Area Calculations Floor Area Calculations Height Measurements Wall Demolition Calculations Site Coverage Zoning Summary Forestry Site Coverage Architectural Site Plan Architectural Site Drainage Plan Main Level Proposed Plan Second Level Proposed Plan Roof Plan Proposed Main Level Existing Plan Second Level Existing Plan Roof Plan Existing Travis Main Travis Second Elevations Proposed Elevations Proposed Existing Elevations Existing Elevations Fence Layout Garage Elevations Transverse Sections Longitudinal Sections Schedules Schedules Assemblies HP HPO Materials Precedent Studies Relationship to Neighborhood Electrical 312 W H y m a n A.F.F. ADJ. ALT. A.B. & ARCH. @ BM. BM. PKT. BRG. BLK'G. BOT. B.F. BLDG. B.O. CAB. CLG. CL. C.T. CLR. COL. CONC. CONN. CONT. DTL. DBL. DWL. E.W. ELEV. OR EL. EXIST'G EXT. F.F. F.D. FLR. FTG. FND. GA. G.L. G.W.B. G.S. HB. HT. HK. HORIZ. HYD. ABOVE FINISH FLOOR ADJUSTABLE ALTERNATE ANCHOR BOLTS AND ARCHITECTURAL AT BEAM BEAM POCKET BEARING BLOCKING BOTTOM BOTTOM OF FOOTING BUILDING BY OWNER CABINET CEILING CENTER LINE CERAMIC TILE CLEAR COLUMN CONCRETE CONNECTION CONTINUOUS DETAIL DOUBLE DOWEL EACH WAY ELEVATION EXISTING EXTERIOR FINISHED FLOOR FLOOR DRAIN FLOOR FOOTING FOUNDATION GAUGE GLU-LAM GYPSUM WALL BOARD GAS STUB HOSE BIB HEIGHT HOOK HORIZONTAL HYDRANT INFO. INSUL. JST. L.L. LONGINT. N.I.C. O.C. OPP. O/ PTD. PERF. PL. PLY. PROP. LINE REINF. RDWD. REQ'D. RESIL. REV. S.M. SIM. S.F. OR SQ. FT. STD. STL. STDS. THK. TLT. T.F. T.P. T.L. T.W. TOT. T.B. TRANSV. TYP. U.N.O. V.I.F. VERT. V.W.C. W.C. W.H. W.P. W.R. WIN. W/ WD. INFORMATION INSULATION JOIST LIVE LOAD LONGITUDINAL NOT IN CONTRACT ON CENTER OPPOSITE OVER PAINTED PERFORATED PLATE PLYWOOD PROPERTY LINE REINFORCEMENT REDWOOD REQUIRED RESILIENT REVISED SHEET METAL SIMILAR SQUARE FEET STANDARD STEEL STUDS THICK TOILET TOP OF FOOTING TOP OF PLATE TOP OF LEDGE TOP OF WALL TOTAL TOWEL BAR TRANSVERSE TYPICAL UNLESS NOTED OTHERWISE VERIFY IN FIELD VERTICAL VINYL WALL COVERING WATER CLOSET WATER HEATER WATERPROOF WATER RESISTANT WINDOW WITH WOOD 312 W Hyman Ave Powder Day Skiiing, LLC, David A Tarrab Mees 312 W Hyman Ave Lots P+Q, Block 46 Aspen CO 81611 USA/Pitkin County UGB, City of Aspen PROJECT: Renovation, Energy Upgrades and Historic Preservation ADDRESS: 312 W Hyman Ave, Aspen, CO 81611 COUNTY: Pitkin County PARCEL NUMBER: 73512464006 PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Interior Renovation and Energy Upgrades, IECC Compliance ZONING: R6 Medium Density Residential CONSTRUCTION TYPE: VB OCCUPANCY GROUP: RESIDENTIAL FIRE PROTECTION: Non-sprinklered NUMBER OF STORIES: TWO ELEVATION 100= 7901.36' SITE RS6 = 6000 SF 1. CONTRACTOR TO COMPLY WITH CODES, LAWS, ORDINANCES, RULES, AND REGULATIONS OF PUBLIC AUTHORITIES GOVERNING THE WORK. 2. CONTRACTOR TO REVIEW DOCUMENTS, VERIFY DIMENSIONS AND FIELD CONDITIONS AND CONFIRM THAT WORK IS BUILDABLE AS SHOWN. CONTRACTOR TO REPORT ANY CONFLICTS OR OMISSIONS TO THE ARCHITECT FOR CLARIFICATION PRIOR TO PERFORMING ANY WORK IN QUESTION. 3. FOR SUBSTITUTIONS, REFER TO THE SPECIFICATIONS. 4. DO NOT SCALE DRAWINGS. DIMENSIONS SHALL TAKE PRECEDENCE OVER SCALES SHOWN ON DRAWINGS, GENERAL CONTRACTOR SHALL VERIFY ALL DIMENSIONS, GRADES AND CONDITIONS AT SITE PRIOR TO COMMENCING THE WORK. 5. MAINTAIN DIMENSIONS MARKED 'CLEAR'. ALLOW FOR THICKNESS OF FINISHES. 6. CEILING HEIGHT DIMENSIONS ARE TO FINISHED SURFACES. 7. CONTRACTOR TO COORDINATE AND PROVIDE BACKING FOR MILLWORK AND ITEMS ATTACHED OR MOUNTED TO WALLS OR CEILINGS. 8. EXCEPT WHERE SHOWN IN DIMENSIONAL DETAIL, THE LOCATIONS OF PLUMBING, MECHANICAL EQUIPMENT, DUCTS, PIPING AND FITTINGS ARE ONLY APPROXIMATE. THE EXACT LOCATIONS SHALL BE DETERMINED BY THE CONTRACTOR, SUBJECT TO APPROVAL BY THE ARCHITECT. 9. CONTRACTOR SHALL PROVIDE AND INSTALL ALL STIFFENERS, BRACING, BLOCKING, AND SUPPORTING BRACKETS REQUIRED FOR THE INSTALLATION OF ALL CASEWORK, TOILET ROOM ACCESSORIES, FIXTURES AND PARTITIONS AND ALL WALL MOUNTED OR SUSPENDED MECHANICAL, ELECTRICAL OR MISCELLANEOUS EQUIPMENT AND FURNISHINGS. 10. ALL WORK PERFORMED SHALL COMPLY WITH THE CONTRACT DOCUMENTS, DRAWINGS, SPECIFICATIONS, AND GEOTECHNICAL INVESTIGATION AND PAVEMENT RECOMMENDATIONS. 11. SPECIFICATIONS, BOUND SEPARATELY, ARE PART OF THE CONTRACT DOCUMENTS. 12. ALL MATERIALS AND WORKMANSHIP SHALL CONFORM TO THE DRAWINGS AND SPECIFICATIONS. IF CONFLICT IS FOUND BETWEEN DRAWINGS, GENERAL NOTES AND SPECIFICATIONS, CONSULT THE ARCHITECT BEFORE PROCEEDING WITH THE WORK. 13. THE STRUCTURAL, MECHANICAL AND ELECTRICAL DRAWINGS ARE SUPPLEMENTARY TO THE ARCHITECTURAL DRAWINGS. IT SHALL BE THE RESPONSIBILITY OF THE CONTRACTOR TO CHECK WITH THE ARCHITECTURAL DRAWINGS BEFORE THE INSTALLATION OF STRUCTURAL, MECHANICAL AND ELECTRICAL WORK. SHOULD THERE BE A DISCREPANCY BETWEEN THE ARCHITECTURAL DRAWINGS AND THE CONSULTING ENGINEERS' DRAWINGS THAT WOULD CAUSE AN AWKWARD INSTALLATION, IT SHALL BE BROUGHT TO THE ARCHITECT'S AND ENGINEERS' ATTENTION FOR CLARIFICATION PRIOR TO THE INSTALLATION OF SAID WORK. 14. GENERAL NOTES ARE NOT A SUBSTITUTE NOR A REPLACEMENT FOR THE PROJECT SPECIFICATIONS. THESE NOTES ARE INTENDED AS A GUIDE TO THE DESIGN AND/OR CONSTRUCTION REQUIREMENTS ESTABLISHED FOR THIS PROJECT. 15. NO CONTRACTOR SHOULD ATTEMPT TO BID OR CONSTRUCT ANY PORTION OF THE WORK WITHOUT CONSULTING THE PROJECT SPECIFICATIONS. 16. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL COORDINATE THE INTENT OF THE GENERAL NOTES WITH ALL TRADES Snow-load: TBC PSF, Up to 8000' Elevation, Elevation is 7901.36' 100' as per Civil = 7901.36' Roof Duration = 1.0 Seismic Design Category = B or C, as per Figure R301.2 (2) As per soil design category Weathering probability for Concrete = Severe Termite Infestation Probability = None to slight Wind Speed = 115 mph (ultimate design) Wind Exposure = B or C, Section R301.2.1.4 Frost Depth = 36", TBC (up to 8000' Elevation) Air Freezing Index = TBC° F Days – Up to 8000 ft. elevation Ice Barrier Underlayment = Required Mean Annual Temp = variable Insulation = as per Minimum R-Values per 2009 IECC, Table 402.1.1, Client chooses to utilize stricter minimums as per 2018 IECC for thermal comfort and energy efficiency. As per State House Bill 09-1091, CO alarms are required within 15 feet of all sleeping rooms BUILDING Pitkin County Currently Adopted Codes. The client will conform with 2018 IECC (Assemblies and Fenestration) and the updated land use code for Energy Efficiency on Earth Day 2020. 2015 International Building Code 2015 International Residential Code 2015 International Mechanical Code 2015 International Plumbing Code 2015 International Fuel & Gas Code 2015 International Energy Conservation Code Pitkin County Efficient Building Code Most Current National Electrical Code Project summary and aims, as per Land Use Code: The historic building and the site remains key elements of the property and the new development does not compromise the visual integrity of the historic property; and The new construction is reflective of the proportional patterns found in the historic building's forms, materials and openings, or the work removes later alterations and restores the historic building to its appearance during its period of significance; and The project is compatible with the character of the neighborhood in which it is located; and Historic outbuildings site and landscape features are retained and stabilized and restored, as appropriate. 08/22/21 COA- HPO Site Visit 02/26/22 COA- HPC Conceptual 04/27/22 COA- HPC Conceptua 06/27/22 COA-HPC Final Attachment 10 61 SHEET TITLE INTEGRATED DESIGN TEAM PROJECT NO: MODEL FILE: DRAWN BY: COPYRIGHT: SHEET 2 V1 Jeffrey H Woodruff 312_W_Hyman_06102022.pln Project No. 116 /Users/jeffrey/Documents/Cloud Hill/312 06 22/312_W_Hyman_06102022.plnPowder Day Skiiing, LLC, David A Tarrab Mees Improvement Survey 312 W Hyman Ave 312 W Hyman Ave Lots P+Q, Block 46 Aspen CO 81611 USA/ Pitkin County UGB, City of Aspen 312 W Hyman Ave Aspen CO 81611 USA Account # R000145 Parcel ID # 273512464006 Landscape Architect Jennifer M. Dolecki-Smith, RLA Escape Garden Design, LLC Interior Design Travis Terry Travis Terry Design Contractor (At Final) Structural Engineer (As per contractor) Civil Grading and Drainage Jay Engstrom, P.E. Crystal River Civil, LLC COA- HPO Site Visit08/22/21 Jeffrey H. Woodruff AIA, LEED AP Cloud Hill Design, LLC Snowmass Snowmass CO 81654 USA COA- HPC Conceptual02/26/22 COA- HPC Conceptual04/27/22 (S75°1 1 ' 0 9 " E 6 0 . 0 0 ' ) S75°14 ' 5 8 " E 5 8 . 5 9 ' E E E G (N14°50'49"E 100.00')N15°05'12"E 99.90' S14°50'49"W 100.00'N75°09 ' 1 1 " W 6 0 . 0 0 ' BASIS O F B E A R I N G S FOUND NO. 5 REBAR FOUND NO. 5 REBAR FOUND NO. 5 REBAR SET FOUND NO. 5 REBAR & 1-1/4" ORANGE PLASTIC CAP PROP CORNER TNC PLS38215 (20.90' W I D E ) GRAVE L A L L E Y ALLEY - B L O C K 4 6 LOT P LOT Q LOT O LOT N LOT R LOT S W. HY M A N A V E N U E (74.80' W I D E P U B L I C ) SE CORNER BLOCK 46 FOUND REBAR & 1-1/2" ALUMINUM CAP (NO STAMPING) N75°09 ' 1 1 " W 5 9 . 9 2 ' (60.00' ) 33.4' 4.0' 4.9' 8.3' 5.5' 11.5' 0.7' 0.7'2.2'0.8' 0.7' 0.7'0.8'2.2'9.2'0.8'0.8'38.4'21.2'7.2'11.1' ( T I E )19.8'(TIE)0.8' 2.4' (TIE)13.4'5.5' APPARENT ENCROACHMENT DRIVEWAY & WOOD RETAINING GRAVEL DRIVEWAYWOOD RETAININGWOOD RETAININGAPPARENT ENCROACHMENT R.R.TIE WALL CONCRETE APRO N UPPER DECK STEPS FLAGSTONE PATIO SIDEWALK2 - STORY FRAME HOUSE 312 WEST HYMAN AVENUE 5976± SQ.FT.NEIGHBORING RESIDENCECONCR E T E C U R B & G U T T E R PAVED R O A D W A Y MAILB O X 4.4' APPARENT ENCROACHMENT WOOD RETAINING ELECTRIC PEDESTAL CATV PEDESTAL TELEPHONE PEDESTAL GAS METER ELECTRICAL METER G LEGEND E SURVEYOR'S CERTIFICATION SURVEY NOTES: LOTS P & Q - BLOCK 46, CITY AND TOWNSITE OF ASPEN SECTION 12, TOWNSHIP 10 SOUTH, RANGE 85 WEST OF THE 6TH PM COUNTY OF PITKIN, STATE OF COLORADO IMPROVEMENT SURVEY PLAT TRUE NORTH COLORADO LLC. A LAND SURVEYING AND MAPPING COMPANY PO BOX 614 - 529 S. WILD HORSE DRIVE NEW CASTLE, COLORADO 81647 (970) 984-0474 www.truenorthcolorado.com PROJECT NO: 2019-104 DATE: JANUARY 18, 2019 DRAWN RPK SURVEYED LDV SHEET 1 OF 1 TRUENORTH A LAND SURVEYING AND MAPPING COMPANY 8'4'16' SCALE: 1" = 8' N PROPERTY DESCRIPTION:0 SCHEDULE B PART II TITLE EXCEPTIONS: 62 SHEET TITLE INTEGRATED DESIGN TEAM PROJECT NO: MODEL FILE: DRAWN BY: COPYRIGHT: SHEET 3 V2 Jeffrey H Woodruff 312_W_Hyman_06102022.pln Project No. 116 /Users/jeffrey/Documents/Cloud Hill/312 06 22/312_W_Hyman_06102022.plnPowder Day Skiiing, LLC, David A Tarrab Mees Topographic Survey Plat 312 W Hyman Ave 312 W Hyman Ave Lots P+Q, Block 46 Aspen CO 81611 USA/ Pitkin County UGB, City of Aspen 312 W Hyman Ave Aspen CO 81611 USA Account # R000145 Parcel ID # 273512464006 Landscape Architect Jennifer M. Dolecki-Smith, RLA Escape Garden Design, LLC Interior Design Travis Terry Travis Terry Design Contractor (At Final) Structural Engineer (As per contractor) Civil Grading and Drainage Jay Engstrom, P.E. Crystal River Civil, LLC COA- HPO Site Visit08/22/21 Jeffrey H. Woodruff AIA, LEED AP Cloud Hill Design, LLC Snowmass Snowmass CO 81654 USA COA- HPC Conceptual02/26/22 COA- HPC Conceptual04/27/22 L M K F G H I B C D E (S7 5 ° 1 1 ' 0 9 " E 6 0 . 0 0 ' ) S7 5 ° 1 4 ' 5 8 " E 5 8 . 5 9 ' E EG (N14°50'49"E 100.00') N15°05'12"E99.90' S14°50'49"W 100.00'N75 ° 0 9 ' 1 1 " W 6 0 . 0 0 ' BA S I S O F B E A R I N G S FOUND N O . 5 R E B A R FOUND N O . 5 R E B A R FOUND N O . 5 R E B A R SITE BEN C H M A R K SET FOU N D N O . 5 R E B A R & 1-1/4" OR A N G E P L A S T I C C A P PROP CO R N E R T N C P L S 3 8 2 1 5 ELEVATIO N : 7 9 0 0 . 8 4 (20. 9 0 ' W I D E ) GR A V E L A L L E Y ALL E Y BL O C K 4 6 LO T P LO T Q LO T O LO T N LO T R LO T S W. H Y M A N A V E N U E (74. 8 0 ' W I D E P U B L I C ) SE CORN E R BLOCK 4 6 FOUND R E B A R & 1 - 1 / 2 " ALUMINU M C A P (NO STA M P I N G ) N75 ° 0 9 ' 1 1 " W 5 9 . 9 2 ' (60. 0 0 ' ) 33.4' 4.0' 4.9' 8.3' 5.5'11.5'0.7' 0.7'2.2'0.8' 0.7' 0.7'0.8'2.2'9.2'0.8'0.8'38.4'21.2'7.2'11. 1 ' ( T I E )19.8'(TIE)0.8'2.4' (TI E )13.4'5.5' APPARE N TENCROA C H M E N T DRIVEWA Y & WOOD R E T A I N I N G GRAVEL DRIVEWA YWOOD RETAININGWOOD RETAININGAPPAREN T ENCROA C H M E N T R.R. TIE WALL CONCRETE APRON UPPER DECK STEPS FLAGSTO N E PATIO SIDEWALK2 - STOR Y FRAME H O U S E & GARAGE312 WES T H Y M A N A V E N U E 0.137± A C R E S5976± SQ . F T .NEIGHBORING RESIDENCECO N C R E T E C U R B & G U T T E R PAV E D R O A D W A Y MAI L B O X 4.4' APPAREN T ENCROA C H M E N T WOOD R E T A I N I N G OS WN6 7 ° 5 3 ' 3 3 " W 1 2 3 7 . 0 4 ' ( T I E ) CITY OF A S P E N GPS MO N U M E N T # 7 CITY OF A S P E N GPS MO N U M E N T # 6 ELEVATI O N : 7 8 9 3 . 6 1 S86°19 ' 5 1 " E 8 1 8 . 1 0 ' ( T I E ) 1 2 3 4 5 678 9 10 11 121314 15 16 GARAGE 7901.31 FFE 7901.36 FFE 7901.33 SOUTH 2nd STREET(74.62' WIDE PUBLIC)79047903 790279017901 7901 790179 0 2 7902 79037 9 0 3 7 9 0 4 10' R E A R S E T B A C K - P R I N C I P A L B U I L D I N G 5' R E A R S E T B A C K - P R I N C I P A L B U I L D I N G U S E D A S G A R A G E & A C C E S S O R Y B U I L D I N G 5' MINIMUM SIDE SETBACK5' MINIMUM SIDE SETBACK10' F R O N T S E T B A C K PRI N C I P A L B U I L D I N G 15' F R O N T S E T B A C K AC C E S S O R Y B U I L D I N G ELECTRIC PEDESTAL CATV PEDESTAL OSW WATER SHUTOFF WATER LINE SEWER LINE TELEPHONE LINE GAS LINE CATV LINE UNDERGROUND ELECTRIC LINE TELEPHONE PEDESTAL GAS METER ELECTRICAL METER G LEGEND E SURVEYOR'S CERTIFICATION I, RODNEY P. KISER, HEREBY CERTIFY TO HENRY LAMBERT & CAREY BOND THAT THIS IS AN "IMPROVEMENT SURVEY PLAT" AS DEFINED BY C.R.S.38-51-102(9) AND THAT IT IS A MONUMENTED LAND SURVEY PERFORMED UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION AND RESPONSIBLE CHARGE SHOWING THE LOCATION OF ALL STRUCTURES, VISIBLE UTILITIES, FENCES, HEDGES, OR WALLS SITUATED ON THE DESCRIBED PARCEL AND WITHIN FIVE FEET OF ALL BOUNDARIES OF SUCH PARCEL, ANY CONFLICTING BOUNDARY EVIDENCE OR VISIBLE ENCROACHMENTS, AND ALL EASEMENTS, UNDERGROUND UTILITIES, AND TUNNELS DESCRIBED IN THE ATTORNEYS TITLE INSURANCE AGENCY OF ASPEN, LLC COMMITMENT FOR TITLE INSURANCE COMMITMENT NO. 18003943, OR OTHER SOURCES AS SPECIFIED ON THE IMPROVEMENT SURVEY PLAT. LINEAR ERROR OF CLOSURE IS LEES THAN 1:15,000. RODNEY P. KISER LICENSED PROFESSIONAL LAND SURVEYOR COLORADO REGISTRATION NO. 38215 SURVEY NOTES: 1. BASIS OF BEARINGS FOR THIS SURVEY IS A BEARING OF N75°09'11"W BETWEEN A FOUND NO. 5 REBARS AS SHOWN HEREON. 2. DATE OF FIELD SURVEY: JANUARY 15, 2019 AND JANUARY 25, 2019. AT THE TIME OF THE FIELD SURVEY THERE WAS 4"+ OF SNOW ON THE GROUND. 3. LINEAR UNITS USED TO PERFORM THIS SURVEY WERE U.S. SURVEY FEET. 4. THIS SURVEY IS BASED ON THE OFFICIAL MAP OF THE CITY OF ASPEN DATED DECEMBER 18, 1959 AS RECEPTION NO. 109043, THE PLAT OF RESUBDIVIDED LOTS K, L, M, N, O, BLOCK 46 RECORDED JANUARY 15, 1982 IN PLAT BOOK 12 AT PAGE 54 AND CORNERS FOUND IN PLACE AS SHOWN HEREON. 5. THIS IMPROVEMENT SURVEY PLAT DOES NOT CONSTITUTE A TITLE SEARCH BY TRUE NORTH COLORADO, LLC, FOR ALL INFORMATION REGARDING EASEMENT, RIGHTS-OF-WAY AND/OR TITLE OF RECORD, TRUE NORTH COLORADO, LLC. RELIED UPON TITLE COMMITMENT NO. 18003943 ISSUED BY ATTORNEYS TITLE INSURANCE AGENCY OF ASPEN, LLC, EFFECTIVE DATE: JANUARY 22, 2019. 6. BEARINGS AND DISTANCES SHOWN HEREON ARE BASED ON FIELD MEASUREMENTS. BEARINGS AND DISTANCES SHOWN IN PARENTHESIS ARE OF RECORD SHOWN ON THE OFFICIAL MAP OF THE CITY OF ASPEN DATED NOVEMBER 16, 1959. 7. THE SUBJECT PROPERTY LIES WITHIN FLOOD ZONE X WHICH ARE AREAS DETERMINED TO BE OUTSIDE THE 500-YEAR FLOOD PLAIN) ACCORDING TO FEMA FLOOD INSURANCE RATE MAP COMMUNITY PANEL NO. 08097C0203C WITH AN EFFECTIVE DATE OF JUNE 4, 1987. 8. THERE ARE NO NATURAL HAZARDS THAT EXIST ON THE SUBJECT PROPERTY. 9. NATURAL SLOPES ARE BETWEEN 0% TO 15% OVER THE ENTIRE SITE. 10. BASED ON 1958 CITY OF ASPEN TOPOGRAPHY THE SUBJECT PROPERTY DOES NOT APPEAR TO BE MANIPULATED FROM HISTORIC GRADE. LOTS P & Q - BLOCK 46, CITY AND TOWNSITE OF ASPEN SECTION 12, TOWNSHIP 10 SOUTH, RANGE 85 WEST OF THE 6TH PMCOUNTY OF PITKIN, STATE OF COLORADO IMPROVEMENT & TOPOGRAPHICSURVEY PLAT YEARS FROM THE DATE OF CERTIFICATION SHOWN HEREON. AFTER YOU FIRST DISCOVER SUCH DEFECT. IN NO EVENT MAY ANY ACTION ACTION BASED UPON ANY DEFECT IN THIS SURVEY WITHIN THREE YEARS BASED UPON ANY DEFECT IN THIS SURVEY BE COMMENCED MORE THAN TEN NOTICE: ACCORDING TO COLORADO LAW YOU MUST COMMENCE ANY LEGAL TRUE NORTH COLORADO LLC. A LAND SURVEYING AND MAPPING COMPANY PO BOX 614 - 529 S. WILD HORSE DRIVE NEW CASTLE, COLORADO 81647 (970) 984-0474 www.truenorthcolorado.com PROJECT NO: 2019-115 DATE: FEBRUARY 1, 2019 RPK LDV 1 OF 1 TRUE NORTH COLORADO A LAND SURVEYING AND MAPPING COMPANY HENRY LAMBERT & CAREY BOND IMPROVEMENT & TOPOGRAPHIC SURVEY PLAT LOTS P & Q - BLOCK 46 CITY OF ASPEN COUNTY OF PITKIN - STATE OF COLORADO 8'4'16' SCALE: 1" = 8' N 0 TREE TYPE SIZE DRIP TREE CHART 1 2 30"40' 16"32' CONIFEROUS CONIFEROUS 3 22"32'CONIFEROUS 4 20"30' 5 6 6"12' 7 8" 8 16'9 10 40"40'CONIFEROUS11 12 ASPEN 13 ASPEN 14 ASPEN 15 ASPEN 16 16"32'ASPEN CONIFEROUS 24"30'CONIFEROUS ASPEN ASPEN ASPEN 16' 16' 8" 8"ASPEN 16"32'ASPEN 8"16' 6"12' 8"16' 8"16' ZONING: CITY OF ASPEN LAND USE CODE: R-6 SETBACKS FRONT YARD: PRINCIPAL BUILDINGS: 10 FEET ACCESSORY BUILDINGS: 15 FEET REAR YARD: PRINCIPAL BUILDINGS: 10 FEET PRINCIPAL BUILDING USED SOLELY AS GARAGE: 5 FEET ACCESSORY BUILDINGS: 5 FEET SIDE YARD: MINIMUM: 5 FEET 10 FEET, PLUS 1 FOOT FOR EACH ADDITIONAL 300 SQUARE FEET OF GROSS LOT AREA, TO A MAXIMUM OF 15 FEET OF TOTAL SIDE YARD 63 SHEET TITLE INTEGRATED DESIGN TEAM PROJECT NO: MODEL FILE: DRAWN BY: COPYRIGHT: SHEET 4 C1 Jeffrey H Woodruff 312_W_Hyman_06102022.pln Project No. 116 /Users/jeffrey/Documents/Cloud Hill/312 06 22/312_W_Hyman_06102022.plnPowder Day Skiiing, LLC, David A Tarrab Mees Civil Site Grading and Drainage 312 W Hyman Ave 312 W Hyman Ave Lots P+Q, Block 46 Aspen CO 81611 USA/ Pitkin County UGB, City of Aspen 312 W Hyman Ave Aspen CO 81611 USA Account # R000145 Parcel ID # 273512464006 Landscape Architect Jennifer M. Dolecki-Smith, RLA Escape Garden Design, LLC Interior Design Travis Terry Travis Terry Design Contractor (At Final) Structural Engineer (As per contractor) Civil Grading and Drainage Jay Engstrom, P.E. Crystal River Civil, LLC COA- HPO Site Visit08/22/21 Jeffrey H. Woodruff AIA, LEED AP Cloud Hill Design, LLC Snowmass Snowmass CO 81654 USA COA- HPC Conceptual02/26/22 COA- HPC Conceptual04/27/22 Civil Grading and Drainage will be provided at Final Review. This is for placement only, pending conceptual approval. This is not for construction. The dry well will be out of the tree protection zone, protecting the roots of conifers #3, #4 and #5 64 SHEET TITLE INTEGRATED DESIGN TEAM PROJECT NO: MODEL FILE: DRAWN BY: COPYRIGHT: SHEET 5 L100 Jeffrey H Woodruff 312_W_Hyman_06102022.pln Project No. 116 /Users/jeffrey/Documents/Cloud Hill/312 06 22/312_W_Hyman_06102022.plnPowder Day Skiiing, LLC, David A Tarrab Mees Landscape Architecture 312 W Hyman Ave 312 W Hyman Ave Lots P+Q, Block 46 Aspen CO 81611 USA/ Pitkin County UGB, City of Aspen 312 W Hyman Ave Aspen CO 81611 USA Account # R000145 Parcel ID # 273512464006 Landscape Architect Jennifer M. Dolecki-Smith, RLA Escape Garden Design, LLC Interior Design Travis Terry Travis Terry Design Contractor (At Final) Structural Engineer (As per contractor) Civil Grading and Drainage Jay Engstrom, P.E. Crystal River Civil, LLC COA- HPO Site Visit08/22/21 Jeffrey H. Woodruff AIA, LEED AP Cloud Hill Design, LLC Snowmass Snowmass CO 81654 USA COA- HPC Conceptual02/26/22 COA- HPC Conceptual04/27/22 65 SHEET TITLE INTEGRATED DESIGN TEAM PROJECT NO: MODEL FILE: DRAWN BY: COPYRIGHT: SHEET 6 Z001 Jeffrey H Woodruff 312_W_Hyman_06102022.pln Project No. 116 /Users/jeffrey/Documents/Cloud Hill/312 06 22/312_W_Hyman_06102022.plnPowder Day Skiiing, LLC, David A Tarrab Mees Floor Area Calculations 312 W Hyman Ave 312 W Hyman Ave Lots P+Q, Block 46 Aspen CO 81611 USA/ Pitkin County UGB, City of Aspen 312 W Hyman Ave Aspen CO 81611 USA Account # R000145 Parcel ID # 273512464006 Landscape Architect Jennifer M. Dolecki-Smith, RLA Escape Garden Design, LLC Interior Design Travis Terry Travis Terry Design Contractor (At Final) Structural Engineer (As per contractor) Civil Grading and Drainage Jay Engstrom, P.E. Crystal River Civil, LLC COA- HPO Site Visit08/22/21 Jeffrey H. Woodruff AIA, LEED AP Cloud Hill Design, LLC Snowmass Snowmass CO 81654 USA COA- HPC Conceptual02/26/22 COA- HPC Conceptual04/27/22 5,976 sq ft 789 sq ft 41 sq ft 16 sq ft 269 sq ft W-gg 4'-6"3'-0"Sill 4'-8 3/4"W-gg2'-8" 3'-10"Sill 5'-5"W-gg2'-8" 3'-10"Sill 5'-0"W-gg2'-8" 3'-10"Sill 5'-0"D-119a7'-6" 5'-10" W-gg2'-8"3'-10"Sill 4'-5 7/32" W-gg2'-8"2'-1"Sill 4'-5 7/32" D-120a 6'-5"8'-3"D-120a 6'-5"8'-3"D-116a7'-0"2'-9"W-gg2'-8" 3'-10"Sill 5'-5"D-116a8'-0" 3'-0" D-116a 7'-0"2'-9"A A B B C C D D E E 4 4 3 3 2 2 1 1 10' R E A R S E T B A C K - P R I N C I P A L B U I L D I N G 5' R E A R S E T B A C K - P R I N C I P A L B U I L D I N G U S E D A S G A R A G E & AC C E S S O R Y B U I L D I N G 5' MINIMUM SIDE SETBACK5' MINIMUM SIDE SETBACK10' F R O N T S E T B A C K PRI N C I P A L B U I L D I N G 15' F R O N T S E T B A C K ACC E S S O R Y B U I L D I N G 10' R E A R S E T B A C K - P R I N C I P A L B U I L D I N G 5' R E A R S E T B A C K - P R I N C I P A L B U I L D I N G U S E D A S G A R A G E & AC C E S S O R Y B U I L D I N G 880 sq ft A A B B C C D D E E 4 4 3 3 2 2 1 1 301 sq ft 60 sq ft Floor Area Calculations City of Aspen 312 W Hyman Zoning Submission Existing Main Level Floor Area Calculations Main Level Gross Floor Area (Sq Ft)824 Garage is 269 Sq Ft, attached Main Level Countable Floor Area (Sq Ft)1,091 Existing Deck/Porch Floor Area Calculations 301 Exempt per 26.575.020.D5, Structural Stairs 60 Sq Ft Front Porch Gross Floor Area (Sq Ft)301 Exempt per 15% of allowable, 15% of 3,240 = 486 Deck/Porch Countable Floor Area (Sq Ft)0 Total Existing Floor Area Calculations Sub-grade Floor Area (Sq Ft)0 Lower Level Floor Area (Sq Ft)880 Main Level Floor Area (Sq Ft)789 Subtracted Stairs at upper level Deck/Porch Floor Area (Sq Ft)0 Total Existing Floor Area (Sq Ft 1,669 N SCALE: 1/8" = 1'-0" 2 Existing Main Level Floor Area Z001 SCALE: 1/8" = 1'-0" 3 Existing Second Level Floor Area Z001 SCALE: 1' = 1'-0" 4 Floor Area Calculations 07272022 Z001 66 SHEET TITLE INTEGRATED DESIGN TEAM PROJECT NO: MODEL FILE: DRAWN BY: COPYRIGHT: SHEET 7 Z002 Jeffrey H Woodruff 312_W_Hyman_06102022.pln Project No. 116 /Users/jeffrey/Documents/Cloud Hill/312 06 22/312_W_Hyman_06102022.plnPowder Day Skiiing, LLC, David A Tarrab Mees Floor Area Calculations 312 W Hyman Ave 312 W Hyman Ave Lots P+Q, Block 46 Aspen CO 81611 USA/ Pitkin County UGB, City of Aspen 312 W Hyman Ave Aspen CO 81611 USA Account # R000145 Parcel ID # 273512464006 Landscape Architect Jennifer M. Dolecki-Smith, RLA Escape Garden Design, LLC Interior Design Travis Terry Travis Terry Design Contractor (At Final) Structural Engineer (As per contractor) Civil Grading and Drainage Jay Engstrom, P.E. Crystal River Civil, LLC COA- HPO Site Visit08/22/21 Jeffrey H. Woodruff AIA, LEED AP Cloud Hill Design, LLC Snowmass Snowmass CO 81654 USA COA- HPC Conceptual02/26/22 COA- HPC Conceptual04/27/22 5,976 sq ft 1,210 sq ft 489 sq ft 393 sq ft 760 sq ft 656 sq ft 272 sq ft 465 sq ft 1,081 sq ft A A B B C C D D E E 4 4 3 3 2 2 1 1 5'-0 1 / 6 4 "11'-3 3/4"308 sq ft Garden Storage (Under Stairs) Stairs Sq Footage Counted on Second Floor Growth commensurate with converting garage to habitable space Wall @ 4'-6" height to add to bedroom/habitable space under stairs, counted at 100% Sq Ft. 5' Set Back 10' R E A R S E T B A C K - P R I N C I P A L B U I L D I N G 5' R E A R S E T B A C K - P R I N C I P A L B U I L D I N G U S E D A S G A R A G E & AC C E S S O R Y B U I L D I N G 5' MINIMUM SIDE SETBACK5' MINIMUM SIDE SETBACK10' F R O N T S E T B A C K PRI N C I P A L B U I L D I N G 15' F R O N T S E T B A C K ACC E S S O R Y B U I L D I N G 952 sq ft 52 sq ft 311 sq ft 59 sq ft A A B B C C D D E E 4 4 3 3 2 2 1 1 Exterior Structural Stairs Counted on 2nd Floor Exterior Deck (Extended to the North) New Exterior Deck (North East) Down Floor Area Calculations City of Aspen 312 W Hyman Zoning Submission Proposed Main Level Floor Area Calculations Main Level Gross Floor Area (Sq Ft)1,210 Garage converted to habitable Main Level Countable Floor Area (Sq Ft)1,210 Table 26.575.020-2,Size of Garage or Carport First 0 to 250 square feet Proposed Deck/Porch Floor Area Calculations Front Porch Gross Floor Area (Sq Ft)363 Exempt per 15% of allowable, 15% of 3,240 = 486, Front deck is 311 and Rear Deck is 52, so 311 + 52 = 363 Deck/Porch Countable Floor Area (Sq Ft)0 Exempt per 26.575.020.D5 Structural Steps Floor Area (Sq Ft)59 Exempt per 26.575.020.D5, as per Assessor, exterior steps Deck/Porch Countable Floor Area (Sq Ft)0 Exempt per 15% of allowable 3240 *.15 = 486, 363 < 486 Total Existing Floor Area Calculations Sub-grade Floor Area (Sq Ft)0 Lower Level Floor Area (Sq Ft)1,210 Garage converted to habitable, extend habitable to the N and E Main Level Floor Area (Sq Ft)952 Extend floor plate to the North Total Proposed Floor Area (Sq Ft)2,162 Allowed is 3,240 SF Garage above 250, Square footage as per Next 251 to 500 square feet, 70 SF counts last 35 SF to F 29 Garage is 308 SF, so .5(58) = 29 2,191 Max floor area = 3,240 1,049 Remaining floor area = 3,240 - 2,191 = 1,049 Trash container is exempt Storage under the stairs is exempt Exterior stairs are exempt as per LUC N SCALE: 1/8" = 1'-0" 1 Proposed Main Level Floor Area Z002 SCALE: 1/8" = 1'-0" 2 Second Floor- Floor Area Z002 SCALE: 1:1.67 3 Floor Area Calculations 07272022 Z002 67 SHEET TITLE INTEGRATED DESIGN TEAM PROJECT NO: MODEL FILE: DRAWN BY: COPYRIGHT: SHEET 8 Z003 Jeffrey H Woodruff 312_W_Hyman_06102022.pln Project No. 116 /Users/jeffrey/Documents/Cloud Hill/312 06 22/312_W_Hyman_06102022.plnPowder Day Skiiing, LLC, David A Tarrab Mees Height Measurements 312 W Hyman Ave 312 W Hyman Ave Lots P+Q, Block 46 Aspen CO 81611 USA/ Pitkin County UGB, City of Aspen 312 W Hyman Ave Aspen CO 81611 USA Account # R000145 Parcel ID # 273512464006 Landscape Architect Jennifer M. Dolecki-Smith, RLA Escape Garden Design, LLC Interior Design Travis Terry Travis Terry Design Contractor (At Final) Structural Engineer (As per contractor) Civil Grading and Drainage Jay Engstrom, P.E. Crystal River Civil, LLC COA- HPO Site Visit08/22/21 Jeffrey H. Woodruff AIA, LEED AP Cloud Hill Design, LLC Snowmass Snowmass CO 81654 USA COA- HPC Conceptual02/26/22 COA- HPC Conceptual04/27/22 ±0" 1 First Floor ±0" 1 First Floor +9'-3" 2 Second Floor +9'-3" 2 Second Floor +18'-3" 3 Roof +18'-3" 3 Roof 19'-3"11'-9"9'-0" 22'-1 5/16" 23'-10" 25'-0" 12'-3" Existing WoodNew Wood Existing Opening Existing Wood Existing CMU Existing CMU New Stucco New Standing Seam Existing Grade (Most Restrictive) Existing Chimney Cap, Match Height Ridge Detached Garage ±0" 1 First Floor ±0" 1 First Floor +9'-3" 2 Second Floor +9'-3" 2 Second Floor +18'-3" 3 Roof +18'-3" 3 Roof 18'-3 1 / 2 " 19'-7 1/16"19'-7 1/16"25'-0"Existing Grade (Most Restrictive) SCALE: 1/4" = 1'-0" 2 West Elevation Height Z003 SCALE: 1/4" = 1'-0" 3 Existing South Elevation Z003 Zoning Note: Height Measurement (Z002): since the ridge line of the structure is below the height maximum, this works. 68 SHEET TITLE INTEGRATED DESIGN TEAM PROJECT NO: MODEL FILE: DRAWN BY: COPYRIGHT: SHEET 9 Z004 Jeffrey H Woodruff 312_W_Hyman_06102022.pln Project No. 116 /Users/jeffrey/Documents/Cloud Hill/312 06 22/312_W_Hyman_06102022.plnPowder Day Skiiing, LLC, David A Tarrab Mees Wall Demolition Calculations 312 W Hyman Ave 312 W Hyman Ave Lots P+Q, Block 46 Aspen CO 81611 USA/ Pitkin County UGB, City of Aspen 312 W Hyman Ave Aspen CO 81611 USA Account # R000145 Parcel ID # 273512464006 Landscape Architect Jennifer M. Dolecki-Smith, RLA Escape Garden Design, LLC Interior Design Travis Terry Travis Terry Design Contractor (At Final) Structural Engineer (As per contractor) Civil Grading and Drainage Jay Engstrom, P.E. Crystal River Civil, LLC COA- HPO Site Visit08/22/21 Jeffrey H. Woodruff AIA, LEED AP Cloud Hill Design, LLC Snowmass Snowmass CO 81654 USA COA- HPC Conceptual02/26/22 COA- HPC Conceptual04/27/22 467 sq ft39 sq ft 535 sq ft 7 sq ft±0" 1 First Floor ±0" 1 First Floor +9'-3" 2 Second Floor +9'-3" 2 Second Floor +18'-3" 3 Roof +18'-3" 3 Roof 25 sq ft 14 sq ft 14 sq ft 11 sq ft 5 sq ft 76 sq ft The existing wall is 535 Square Feet. The reduction for fenestration is 91 Square Feet The wall area is 444 Square Feet. Demolition on the North Elevation, net of fenestration, is 376 Square Feet. A B 22 sq ft 20 sq ft95 sq ft 84 sq ft389 sq ft 70 sq ft 35 sq ft 32 sq ft 10 sq ft 13 sq ft 95 sq ft456 sq ft 83 sq ft 20 sq ft 20 sq ft±0" 1 First Floor ±0" 1 First Floor +9'-3" 2 Second Floor +9'-3" 2 Second Floor +18'-3" 3 Roof +18'-3" 3 Roof The existing wall is 654 Square Feet. The reduction for fenestration is 90 Square Feet The wall area is 564 Square Feet. Demolition on the East Elevation is 84+20 = 104 Square Feet, net of fenestration. C D EF 404 sq ft 35 sq ft 35 sq ft 10 sq ft 56 sq ft 56 sq ft 598 sq ft ±0" 1 First Floor ±0" 1 First Floor +9'-3" 2 Second Floor +9'-3" 2 Second Floor +18'-3" 3 Roof +18'-3" 3 Roof The existing wall is 598 Square Feet. The reduction for fenestration is 192 Square Feet The wall area is 406 Square Feet. No demolition on the South Facade 536 sq ft 22 sq ft 22 sq ft 10 sq ft 10 sq ft48 sq ft 647 sq ft 19 sq ft 48 sq ft ±0" 1 First Floor +9'-3" 2 Second Floor +18'-3" 3 Roof The existing wall is 647 Square Feet. The reduction for fenestration is 111 Square Feet The wall area is 536 Square Feet. The total demolition on the West Facade is 19 Square Feet. Demoltion Calculations City of Aspen 312 West Hyman Zoning Submission Wall Demolition Wall Label Individual Wall Area (Sq Ft) Area Reduced or Fenestration (Sq Ft) Area of Wall to be Removed (Sq Ft) A- North Wall 535 69 390 B- North Wall 39 24 15 C- East Wall 95 10 85 D- East Wall 20 0 20 E- East Wall 83 13 0 F- East Wall 456 67 0 G- South Wall 598 194 0 I- West Wall 647 111 67 Wall Surface Area Total (Sq Ft)2473 Area Reduced for Fenestration (Sq Ft)488 Area Used for Demo Calculation 577 Demolition Totals Roof and Wall Area Used for Demo Calculation (Sq Ft)577 Surface Area to be Removed (Sq Ft) Total 577 SCALE: 1/16" = 1'-0" 2 North Walls Wall A and Wall B Z004 SCALE: 1/16" = 1'-0" 3 East Walls Wall C and Wall D and Wall E Z004 SCALE: 1/16" = 1'-0" 4 South Walls F Z004 SCALE: 1/16" = 1'-0" 5 East Wall G Z004 SCALE: 1' = 1'-0" 6 Floor Area Calculations 07272022 Z004 69 SHEET TITLE INTEGRATED DESIGN TEAM PROJECT NO: MODEL FILE: DRAWN BY: COPYRIGHT: SHEET 10 Z005 Jeffrey H Woodruff 312_W_Hyman_06102022.pln Project No. 116 /Users/jeffrey/Documents/Cloud Hill/312 06 22/312_W_Hyman_06102022.plnPowder Day Skiiing, LLC, David A Tarrab Mees Site Coverage 312 W Hyman Ave 312 W Hyman Ave Lots P+Q, Block 46 Aspen CO 81611 USA/ Pitkin County UGB, City of Aspen 312 W Hyman Ave Aspen CO 81611 USA Account # R000145 Parcel ID # 273512464006 Landscape Architect Jennifer M. Dolecki-Smith, RLA Escape Garden Design, LLC Interior Design Travis Terry Travis Terry Design Contractor (At Final) Structural Engineer (As per contractor) Civil Grading and Drainage Jay Engstrom, P.E. Crystal River Civil, LLC COA- HPO Site Visit08/22/21 Jeffrey H. Woodruff AIA, LEED AP Cloud Hill Design, LLC Snowmass Snowmass CO 81654 USA COA- HPC Conceptual02/26/22 COA- HPC Conceptual04/27/22 5,976 sq ft 1,210 sq ft 489 sq ft 393 sq ft 760 sq ft 656 sq ft 272 sq ft 465 sq ft 1,081 sq ft W 2E2'-8" 3'-10"Sill 5'-7 5/64"D 1E8'-0" 3'-0" W 4E2'-8"3'-10"Sill 4'-5" W 3E2'-8"2'-1"Sill 4'-5" D 3E6'-5"7'-9"D 2E6'-5"7'-9"W 18N4'-0" 4'-3"Sill 3'-6"D 1N 7'-6"6'-0"W 1 7 N 4'-0"3'-0"Sill 4 ' - 3 " D 4N 6'-5"7'-9"D 5N 6'-5"7'-9"W 1N5'-0" 2'-6"Sill 2'-6"W 1 9 N 4'-0"4'-3"Sill 4 ' - 3 " D 25 N 8'-0"3'-0"D 23 N 7'-0"10'-0"D 24 N 6'-3"5'-0"W 6E2'-8" 3'-10"Sill 5'-0"W 5E2'-8" 3'-10"Sill 5'-0"D 6N7'-6" 3'-6"D 10N7'-0" 2'-10"W 6E4'-0" 2'-0"Sill 3'-6"D 1N 7'-6"6'-0"D 3N2'-9" 3'-0"D 4N6'-8" 4'-0" D 4N8'-0"2'-2"D 0N8'-0"2'-4"D 7N 8'-0"2'-0"D 8N8'-0" 2'-6"D 1N8'-0" 2'-2"D 3N8'-0" 2'-6"D 6N8'-0" 2'-4" D 2N8'-0"2'-6"D 9N8'-0" 2'-6" A A B B C C D D E E 4 4 3 3 2 2 1 1 5'-0 1 / 6 4 "11'-3 3/4"308 sq ft Garden Storage (Under Stairs) Stairs Sq Footage Counted on Second Floor Growth commensurate with converting garage to habitable space Wall @ 4'-6" height to add to bedroom/habitable space under stairs, counted at 100% Sq Ft. 5' Set Back 10' R E A R S E T B A C K - P R I N C I P A L B U I L D I N G 5' R E A R S E T B A C K - P R I N C I P A L B U I L D I N G U S E D A S G A R A G E & A C C E S S O R Y B U I L D I N G 5' MINIMUM SIDE SETBACK5' MINIMUM SIDE SETBACK10' F R O N T S E T B A C K PRI N C I P A L B U I L D I N G 15' F R O N T S E T B A C K ACC E S S O R Y B U I L D I N G 5,976 sq ft 789 sq ft 41 sq ft 16 sq ft 269 sq ft W-gg 4'-6"3'-0"Sill 4'-8 3/4"W-gg2'-8" 3'-10"Sill 5'-5"W-gg2'-8" 3'-10"Sill 5'-0"W-gg2'-8" 3'-10"Sill 5'-0"D-119a7'-6" 5'-10" W-gg2'-8"3'-10"Sill 4'-5 7/32" W-gg2'-8"2'-1"Sill 4'-5 7/32" D-120a 6'-5"8'-3"D-120a 6'-5"8'-3"D-116a7'-0"2'-9"W-gg2'-8" 3'-10"Sill 5'-5"D-116a8'-0" 3'-0" D-116a 7'-0"2'-9"A A B B C C D D E E 4 4 3 3 2 2 1 1 Wall @ 4'-6" height to add to bedroom/habitable space under stairs, counted at 100% Sq Ft. 10' R E A R S E T B A C K - P R I N C I P A L B U I L D I N G 5' R E A R S E T B A C K - P R I N C I P A L B U I L D I N G U S E D A S G A R A G E & A C C E S S O R Y B U I L D I N G 5' MINIMUM SIDE SETBACK5' MINIMUM SIDE SETBACK10' F R O N T S E T B A C K PRI N C I P A L B U I L D I N G 15' F R O N T S E T B A C K ACC E S S O R Y B U I L D I N G 10' R E A R S E T B A C K - P R I N C I P A L B U I L D I N G 5' R E A R S E T B A C K - P R I N C I P A L B U I L D I N G U S E D A S G A R A G E & A C C E S S O R Y B U I L D I N G Proposed Development Zoning Allowance and Project Summary City of Aspen 312 W Hyman Zoning Submission Proposed Development Single Family | Remodel Addition Parcel #273512464006 Zone District R6 Existing Allowed (Principal)Allowed (Accessory) Proposed (Principal) Proposed Accessory LUC Reference Setbacks 26.710.060 Front 19’-7”25’25’19’-7”n/a 26.710.060 Rear 33’-6”10’5’33’-6”5’26.710.060 Combined Front/Rear 26.710.060 East Side 2’-4”5’5’2’-4”5’26.710.060 West Side 11 2/3’10’10’11 2/3’5’26.710.040 Medium-Density Residential (R-6). Combined Side 15’15’15’7’-4”, No change to West Principal 5’, Variance Required for the West Garage D 4 is Minimum combined 10’ Distance between Buildings N/A N/A 11.07’, between the garage and the principal N/A 11.07’, between the garage and the principal 26.710.060 Corner Lot No No n/a No na/26.710.060 Floor Area (Square Feet)1,669 3,240 2,171 Supplemental Breakdown Info Existing Required Proposed LUC Reference Net Leasable/Comm (Sq Ft)Not Req for Residential N/A 26.575.020.I. Open Space %80.79%Not Req for R-6 73.81%26.710.060 Site Coverage 19.21%Not Req for R-6 26.19%26.710.060 On-Site Parking 2 2 2 26.515.030 Site Coverage Existing LUC Reference Gross Lot Area (Sq Ft)6,000 6,000 Z-007, Lot is RS-6 Area of Building Footprint (Sq Ft)1148 1091+41+16 1,579 1210+29+32+308 26.575.020.G. Site Coverage 19.13%26.32% Land Value Summary Actual Value Land $3,200,000 Improvements $718,000 Total $3,918,000 N SCALE: 1/8" = 1'-0" 2 Proposed Site Coverage Z005 SCALE: 1/8" = 1'-0" 3 Existing Site Coverage Z005 SCALE: 1:2.86 4 Floor Area Calculations 07272022 Z005 70 SHEET TITLE INTEGRATED DESIGN TEAM PROJECT NO: MODEL FILE: DRAWN BY: COPYRIGHT: SHEET 11 Z006 Jeffrey H Woodruff 312_W_Hyman_06102022.pln Project No. 116 /Users/jeffrey/Documents/Cloud Hill/312 06 22/312_W_Hyman_06102022.plnPowder Day Skiiing, LLC, David A Tarrab Mees Zoning Summary 312 W Hyman Ave 312 W Hyman Ave Lots P+Q, Block 46 Aspen CO 81611 USA/ Pitkin County UGB, City of Aspen 312 W Hyman Ave Aspen CO 81611 USA Account # R000145 Parcel ID # 273512464006 Landscape Architect Jennifer M. Dolecki-Smith, RLA Escape Garden Design, LLC Interior Design Travis Terry Travis Terry Design Contractor (At Final) Structural Engineer (As per contractor) Civil Grading and Drainage Jay Engstrom, P.E. Crystal River Civil, LLC COA- HPO Site Visit08/22/21 Jeffrey H. Woodruff AIA, LEED AP Cloud Hill Design, LLC Snowmass Snowmass CO 81654 USA COA- HPC Conceptual02/26/22 COA- HPC Conceptual04/27/22 Proposed Development Zoning Allowance and Project Summary City of Aspen 312 W Hyman Zoning Submission Proposed Development Single Family | Remodel Addition Parcel #273512464006 Zone District R6 Existing Allowed (Principal)Allowed (Accessory) Proposed (Principal) Proposed Accessory LUC Reference Setbacks 26.710.060 Front 19’-7”25’25’19’-7”n/a 26.710.060 Rear 33’-6”10’5’33’-6”5’26.710.060 Combined Front/Rear 26.710.060 East Side 2’-4”5’5’2’-4”5’26.710.060 West Side 11 2/3’10’10’11 2/3’5’26.710.040 Medium-Density Residential (R-6). Combined Side 15’15’15’7’-4”, No change to West Principal 5’, Variance Required for the West Garage D 4 is Minimum combined 10’ Distance between Buildings N/A N/A 11.07’, between the garage and the principal N/A 11.07’, between the garage and the principal 26.710.060 Corner Lot No No n/a No na/26.710.060 Floor Area (Square Feet)1,669 3,240 2,171 Supplemental Breakdown Info Existing Required Proposed LUC Reference Net Leasable/Comm (Sq Ft)Not Req for Residential N/A 26.575.020.I. Open Space %80.79%Not Req for R-6 73.81%26.710.060 Site Coverage 19.21%Not Req for R-6 26.19%26.710.060 On-Site Parking 2 2 2 26.515.030 Site Coverage Existing LUC Reference Gross Lot Area (Sq Ft)6,000 6,000 Z-007, Lot is RS-6 Area of Building Footprint (Sq Ft)1148 1091+41+16 1,579 1210+29+32+308 26.575.020.G. Site Coverage 19.13%26.32% Land Value Summary Actual Value Land $3,200,000 Improvements $718,000 Total $3,918,000 SCALE: 1' = 1'-0" 2 Floor Area Calculations 07272022 Z006 71 SHEET TITLE INTEGRATED DESIGN TEAM PROJECT NO: MODEL FILE: DRAWN BY: COPYRIGHT: SHEET 12 Z008 Jeffrey H Woodruff 312_W_Hyman_06102022.pln Project No. 116 /Users/jeffrey/Documents/Cloud Hill/312 06 22/312_W_Hyman_06102022.plnPowder Day Skiiing, LLC, David A Tarrab Mees Forestry Site Coverage 312 W Hyman Ave 312 W Hyman Ave Lots P+Q, Block 46 Aspen CO 81611 USA/ Pitkin County UGB, City of Aspen 312 W Hyman Ave Aspen CO 81611 USA Account # R000145 Parcel ID # 273512464006 Landscape Architect Jennifer M. Dolecki-Smith, RLA Escape Garden Design, LLC Interior Design Travis Terry Travis Terry Design Contractor (At Final) Structural Engineer (As per contractor) Civil Grading and Drainage Jay Engstrom, P.E. Crystal River Civil, LLC COA- HPO Site Visit08/22/21 Jeffrey H. Woodruff AIA, LEED AP Cloud Hill Design, LLC Snowmass Snowmass CO 81654 USA COA- HPC Conceptual02/26/22 COA- HPC Conceptual04/27/22 5,976 sq ft 488.75 sq ft 392.75 sq ft 760.25 sq ft 656.25 sq ft 271.75 sq ft 464.75 sq ft 1,081 sq ft 1 2 3 4 5 678 9 10 1112131415 16 10' F R O N T S E T B A C K PRI N C I P A L B U I L D I N G5' MINIMUM SIDE SETBACKSCALE: 1/8" = 1'-0" 1 First Floor- Tree Z008 Site Total RS-6 6000 SF Tree Protection Zone/Pervious Space North/East Trees 680.25 SF South State Tree 760.25 SF Tree Site Coverage 1,440.50 SF Tree Site % 24.01% Impervious Site Coverage Chalet 1210.75 SF Garage 307.5 SF Enclosure 32.25 SF Build out site 1550.50 Build out site % 25.84% Pervious Open Space North 1064.50 SF South East 488.75 SF South West 392.75 SF West Tree 464.75 SF * East Tree 271.75 SF * Open Space 2682.50 Open Space% 44.71% Pavers/skirt ~5.44 % * East and West Deciduous trees counted toward open space North West Garage/Trash Enclosure Strengths: º Aligned with existing site disturbance, the railroad tie retaining wall º Leaves the largest open space in the backyard º No/little impact to trees #3, #4 and #5 and no impact to Aspens along East property line º Does not interfere with existing utilities (maybe gas, but not electric) º Benefits to house across alley (north), views to Shadow Mountain º Minor negative to St Moritz, but ridge line is 12'-6" and grade steps down 3' grade (from the property line to the NE corner of the garage) and 6' retaining wall, so impact is negligible to St Moritz º Distance between the Garage and the Residence is 11', goes to 12' with the 2.5' side setback º Keep all trees, gravel between the alley and the garage º Distance between the property line and Tree #1 is 15'-7", if the neighboring retaining wall is plum and does not encroach on the West property line. Weaknesses: º Minimal impacts to Trees #1 and #2, development, both permeable and hardscape in the Tree #1 drip-line 13' from retaining wall to tree #1 (layout assumes less than 5' setback or additional/variance to combined side setback in R6. If the retaining wall was plum this measurement would be 15' º Impact to existing utilities, gas, which runs to the West and South of tree #1 º Difficult entry, entry from the East due to grade changes at the alley º Drainage 72 SHEET TITLE INTEGRATED DESIGN TEAM PROJECT NO: MODEL FILE: DRAWN BY: COPYRIGHT: SHEET 13 A101 Jeffrey H Woodruff 312_W_Hyman_06102022.pln Project No. 116 /Users/jeffrey/Documents/Cloud Hill/312 06 22/312_W_Hyman_06102022.plnPowder Day Skiiing, LLC, David A Tarrab Mees Architectural Site Plan 312 W Hyman Ave 312 W Hyman Ave Lots P+Q, Block 46 Aspen CO 81611 USA/ Pitkin County UGB, City of Aspen 312 W Hyman Ave Aspen CO 81611 USA Account # R000145 Parcel ID # 273512464006 Landscape Architect Jennifer M. Dolecki-Smith, RLA Escape Garden Design, LLC Interior Design Travis Terry Travis Terry Design Contractor (At Final) Structural Engineer (As per contractor) Civil Grading and Drainage Jay Engstrom, P.E. Crystal River Civil, LLC COA- HPO Site Visit08/22/21 Jeffrey H. Woodruff AIA, LEED AP Cloud Hill Design, LLC Snowmass Snowmass CO 81654 USA COA- HPC Conceptual02/26/22 COA- HPC Conceptual04/27/22 1,210.5 sq ft A A B B C C D D E E 4 4 3 3 2 2 1 1 1.55 5 ' 2.40 6 '5.011'11.6 8 ' 8.167'10.167'10'4.25'9'11.749'19.25'5.00 1 '11.313'308 sq ft Proposed fence at the 5' side setback and 5' rear setback, lined on the South with shrubs, see landscaping plan St Moritz R e t a i n i n g w a l l ( e x i s t i n g and under r e h a b i l i t a t i o n ) Removal of T r e e s # 1 a n d # 2 Removal of T r e e s # 1 a n d # 2 E EG OS W7904790379027901 7901 7901 790179 0 2 7902 790379 0 3 7 9 0 4 10' R E A R S E T B A C K - P R I N C I P A L B U I L D I N G 5' R E A R S E T B A C K - P R I N C I P A L B U I L D I N G U S E D A S G A R A G E & A C C E S S O R Y B U I L D I N G 5' MINIMUM SIDE SETBACK10' F R O N T S E T B A C K PRI N C I P A L B U I L D I N G 15' F R O N T S E T B A C K ACC E S S O R Y B U I L D I N G N SCALE: 1/8" = 1'-0" 1 Architectural Site Plan A101 73 SHEET TITLE INTEGRATED DESIGN TEAM PROJECT NO: MODEL FILE: DRAWN BY: COPYRIGHT: SHEET 14 A102 Jeffrey H Woodruff 312_W_Hyman_06102022.pln Project No. 116 /Users/jeffrey/Documents/Cloud Hill/312 06 22/312_W_Hyman_06102022.plnPowder Day Skiiing, LLC, David A Tarrab Mees Architectural Site Drainage Plan 312 W Hyman Ave 312 W Hyman Ave Lots P+Q, Block 46 Aspen CO 81611 USA/ Pitkin County UGB, City of Aspen 312 W Hyman Ave Aspen CO 81611 USA Account # R000145 Parcel ID # 273512464006 Landscape Architect Jennifer M. Dolecki-Smith, RLA Escape Garden Design, LLC Interior Design Travis Terry Travis Terry Design Contractor (At Final) Structural Engineer (As per contractor) Civil Grading and Drainage Jay Engstrom, P.E. Crystal River Civil, LLC COA- HPO Site Visit08/22/21 Jeffrey H. Woodruff AIA, LEED AP Cloud Hill Design, LLC Snowmass Snowmass CO 81654 USA COA- HPC Conceptual02/26/22 COA- HPC Conceptual04/27/22 A A B B C C D D E E 4 4 3 3 2 2 1 1 100' 100' 1 A301 2 A301 4 Z004 2 A210 1 A211 3 A211 4 A211 #DrgID #LayID potential tree removal (2) to NW trees protected (3) to NE Plaster covered CMU wall with two layers of 5/8" Type X Gypsum, 1 hour fire wall Garage and enclosure meet rear and side setbacks. Existing rail ties are not plumb. Avoid current hazard. UP bedroom #2 bathe #3 mechanical boot c u b b i e s trash & r e c y c l i n g e n c l o s u r e bathe #2 buried dry- well, storm water run-off onsite collection new perf- pipe surrounding single car garage disturbance, drains to dry well in the North-East of the lot provide tree protection zone (TPZ) for existing trees to the North East of the site closet boot c u b b i e s & be n c h bedroom #3 main entry heat pumps (2)electric meters (2)gas & radon egress egress egress entry/mud w/d garden storage 1 A300 2 A300 1 A200 2 A2002 Z003 N SCALE: 1/8" = 1'-0" 1 Site Plan Draft Drainage A102 74 SHEET TITLE INTEGRATED DESIGN TEAM PROJECT NO: MODEL FILE: DRAWN BY: COPYRIGHT: SHEET 15 A103 Jeffrey H Woodruff 312_W_Hyman_06102022.pln Project No. 116 /Users/jeffrey/Documents/Cloud Hill/312 06 22/312_W_Hyman_06102022.plnPowder Day Skiiing, LLC, David A Tarrab Mees Main Level Proposed Plan 312 W Hyman Ave 312 W Hyman Ave Lots P+Q, Block 46 Aspen CO 81611 USA/ Pitkin County UGB, City of Aspen 312 W Hyman Ave Aspen CO 81611 USA Account # R000145 Parcel ID # 273512464006 Landscape Architect Jennifer M. Dolecki-Smith, RLA Escape Garden Design, LLC Interior Design Travis Terry Travis Terry Design Contractor (At Final) Structural Engineer (As per contractor) Civil Grading and Drainage Jay Engstrom, P.E. Crystal River Civil, LLC COA- HPO Site Visit08/22/21 Jeffrey H. Woodruff AIA, LEED AP Cloud Hill Design, LLC Snowmass Snowmass CO 81654 USA COA- HPC Conceptual02/26/22 COA- HPC Conceptual04/27/22 W 2E2'-8" 3'-10"Sill 5'-7 5/64"D 1E8'-0" 3'-0" W 4E2'-8"3'-10"Sill 4'-5" W 3E2'-8"2'-1"Sill 4'-5" D 3E6'-5"7'-9"D 2E6'-5"7'-9"D 1N 7'-6"6'-0"W 1 7 N 4'-0"3'-0"Sill 4 ' - 3 " D 4N 6'-5"7'-9"D 5N 6'-5"7'-9"W 1N5'-0" 2'-6"Sill 2'-6"W 1 9 N 4'-0"4'-3"Sill 4 ' - 3 " D 25 N 8'-0"3'-0"D 23 N 7'-0"10'-0"D 24 N 6'-3"5'-0"W 6E2'-8" 3'-10"Sill 5'-0"W 5E2'-8" 3'-10"Sill 5'-0"D 6N7'-6" 3'-6"D 10N7'-0" 2'-10"W 6E4'-0" 2'-0"Sill 3'-6"D 1N 7'-6"6'-0"D 3N2'-9" 3'-0"D 4N6'-8" 4'-0" D 4N8'-0"2'-2"D 0N8'-0"2'-4"D 7N 8'-0"2'-0"D 8N8'-0" 2'-6"D 1N8'-0" 2'-2"D 3N8'-0" 2'-6"D 6N8'-0" 2'-4" D 2N8'-0"2'-6"D 9N8'-0" 2'-6" A B C D E 4 4 3 3 2 2 1 1 F/R16'-4 5 / 8 "20'-4"8'-2 1 7 / 6 4 "43'-0"32'-7"23'-9"16'-3"1'-6 2 1 / 3 2 " 2'-4 7 / 8 "5'-0 1/8"11'-8 5 / 3 2 " 8'-2"10'-2"10'-0"4'-3"9'-0"11'-9"19'-3"32'-7"3'-0"2'-6"2'-0"100' = 7901.31' 100' 100' = 7901.31' 4 Z004 1 A301 2 A301 2 A210 1 A211 3 A211 4 A211 trees protected #3, #4, and # 5 to NE Plaster covered CMU wall with two layers of 5/8" Type X Gypsum, 1 hour fire wall, Cementitious soffit Proposed fence at the 5' side setback and 5' rear setback, lined on the South with shrubs, see landscaping plan St Moritz R e t a i n i n g w a l l ( e x i s t i n g and under r e h a b i l i t a t i o n ) Removal of T r e e # 2 Removal of T r e e # 1 UP bedroom #2 bathe #3 mechanical boot c u b b i e s trash & r e c y c l i n g e n c l o s u r e bathe #2 closet boot c u b b i e s & be n c h bedroom #3 main entry heat pumps (2) electric meters (2) gas & radon egress egress egress entry/mud w/d garden storage 1/2 bathe 1 A300 1 A200 2 A200 2 Z003 2 A300 N SCALE: 1/4" = 1'-0" 1 First Floor A103 75 SHEET TITLE INTEGRATED DESIGN TEAM PROJECT NO: MODEL FILE: DRAWN BY: COPYRIGHT: SHEET 16 A104 Jeffrey H Woodruff 312_W_Hyman_06102022.pln Project No. 116 /Users/jeffrey/Documents/Cloud Hill/312 06 22/312_W_Hyman_06102022.plnPowder Day Skiiing, LLC, David A Tarrab Mees Second Level Proposed Plan 312 W Hyman Ave 312 W Hyman Ave Lots P+Q, Block 46 Aspen CO 81611 USA/ Pitkin County UGB, City of Aspen 312 W Hyman Ave Aspen CO 81611 USA Account # R000145 Parcel ID # 273512464006 Landscape Architect Jennifer M. Dolecki-Smith, RLA Escape Garden Design, LLC Interior Design Travis Terry Travis Terry Design Contractor (At Final) Structural Engineer (As per contractor) Civil Grading and Drainage Jay Engstrom, P.E. Crystal River Civil, LLC COA- HPO Site Visit08/22/21 Jeffrey H. Woodruff AIA, LEED AP Cloud Hill Design, LLC Snowmass Snowmass CO 81654 USA COA- HPC Conceptual02/26/22 COA- HPC Conceptual04/27/22 W 11E4'-0" 7'-0"Sill 2'-4"W 13N3'-0"2'-0"Sill -1'-0 1/8"W 15E3'-6" 6'-0"Sill 3'-0"W 16E3'-6" 6'-0"Sill 3'-0"W 12E5'-0"7'-0"Sill 1'-4" W 14E5'-0"7'-0"Sill 1'-4" D 22E 6'-6"3'-0"W 0N4'-0" 3'-0"Sill 3'-0"W 0N4'-0" 3'-0"Sill 3'-0"D 1N7'-0" 5'-0" W 7E 4'-0"2'-0"Sill 3'-0"D 19N6'-8" 3'-0" D 20N 8'-0"2'-6"W 7N 4'-0"1'-2"Sill 3'-0" W 7N 4'-6"2'-0"Sill 2'-6" W 9N 4'-6"2'-0"Sill 2'-6" D 18N 8'-0"2'-10"W 7N2'-0" 2'-0"Sill 5'-0"D 18N8'-0"2'-0"D 18N8'-0"2'-0"A A B B C C D D E E 4 4 3 3 2 2 1 1 FDWRE R4 Z004 1 A301 2 A301 2 A210 8'-2"10'-2"10'-0"4'-3"9'-0"11'-9"19'-3"32'-7"40'-0"11'-2 31/32" 9'-3" 9'-3" 1 A300 1 A200 2 A200 2 Z003 2 A300 kitchen bathe #1 living room down deck deck fireplace bedroom 1 closetegress down N SCALE: 1/4" = 1'-0" 1 Second Floor A104 76 SHEET TITLE INTEGRATED DESIGN TEAM PROJECT NO: MODEL FILE: DRAWN BY: COPYRIGHT: SHEET 17 A105 Jeffrey H Woodruff 312_W_Hyman_06102022.pln Project No. 116 /Users/jeffrey/Documents/Cloud Hill/312 06 22/312_W_Hyman_06102022.plnPowder Day Skiiing, LLC, David A Tarrab Mees Roof Plan Proposed 312 W Hyman Ave 312 W Hyman Ave Lots P+Q, Block 46 Aspen CO 81611 USA/ Pitkin County UGB, City of Aspen 312 W Hyman Ave Aspen CO 81611 USA Account # R000145 Parcel ID # 273512464006 Landscape Architect Jennifer M. Dolecki-Smith, RLA Escape Garden Design, LLC Interior Design Travis Terry Travis Terry Design Contractor (At Final) Structural Engineer (As per contractor) Civil Grading and Drainage Jay Engstrom, P.E. Crystal River Civil, LLC COA- HPO Site Visit08/22/21 Jeffrey H. Woodruff AIA, LEED AP Cloud Hill Design, LLC Snowmass Snowmass CO 81654 USA COA- HPC Conceptual02/26/22 COA- HPC Conceptual04/27/22W 100N6'-0" 3'-6"Sill 1'-3 39/64"W 100N6'-0" 3'-6"Sill 1'-5 13/32"A B C D E 4 4 3 3 2 2 1 1 1' Overhang, typ. Protected entry Solar as per onsite Energy Requirements 4:12 4:12 3.5:12 3.5:12 3.5:12 3.5:12 N SCALE: 1/4" = 1'-0" 1 Roof Plan A105 Note: Today this is a cold roof with attic vents. The current attic vents and screens are in disrepair (upon viewing from the attic) We are proposing removing the dropped ceiling, removing the attic vents and exposing the rafters, adding insulation and updating the light and vent in a Chalet style. The only exterior change, will be converting the attic vents to the same size rough opening, but installing hopper fenestration for light and vent. U-Value for horizontal fenestration = .50 as per IECC 2021 77 SHEET TITLE INTEGRATED DESIGN TEAM PROJECT NO: MODEL FILE: DRAWN BY: COPYRIGHT: SHEET 18 A106 Jeffrey H Woodruff 312_W_Hyman_06102022.pln Project No. 116 /Users/jeffrey/Documents/Cloud Hill/312 06 22/312_W_Hyman_06102022.plnPowder Day Skiiing, LLC, David A Tarrab Mees Main Level Existing Plan 312 W Hyman Ave 312 W Hyman Ave Lots P+Q, Block 46 Aspen CO 81611 USA/ Pitkin County UGB, City of Aspen 312 W Hyman Ave Aspen CO 81611 USA Account # R000145 Parcel ID # 273512464006 Landscape Architect Jennifer M. Dolecki-Smith, RLA Escape Garden Design, LLC Interior Design Travis Terry Travis Terry Design Contractor (At Final) Structural Engineer (As per contractor) Civil Grading and Drainage Jay Engstrom, P.E. Crystal River Civil, LLC COA- HPO Site Visit08/22/21 Jeffrey H. Woodruff AIA, LEED AP Cloud Hill Design, LLC Snowmass Snowmass CO 81654 USA COA- HPC Conceptual02/26/22 COA- HPC Conceptual04/27/22 41 sq ft A A B B C C D D E E 4 4 3 3 2 2 1 1 W/D W/D 6'-10" 3 Z003 2 Z004 3 Z004 2 A204 KITCHEN BATHROOM BEDROOM LIVING ROOM F.P. STORAGE BEDROOM CLOSET STORAGE GARAGE MECHANICAL STORAGE GARAGE UP N SCALE: 1/4" = 1'-0" 1 First Floor Existing A106 78 SHEET TITLE INTEGRATED DESIGN TEAM PROJECT NO: MODEL FILE: DRAWN BY: COPYRIGHT: SHEET 19 A107 Jeffrey H Woodruff 312_W_Hyman_06102022.pln Project No. 116 /Users/jeffrey/Documents/Cloud Hill/312 06 22/312_W_Hyman_06102022.plnPowder Day Skiiing, LLC, David A Tarrab Mees Second Level Existing Plan 312 W Hyman Ave 312 W Hyman Ave Lots P+Q, Block 46 Aspen CO 81611 USA/ Pitkin County UGB, City of Aspen 312 W Hyman Ave Aspen CO 81611 USA Account # R000145 Parcel ID # 273512464006 Landscape Architect Jennifer M. Dolecki-Smith, RLA Escape Garden Design, LLC Interior Design Travis Terry Travis Terry Design Contractor (At Final) Structural Engineer (As per contractor) Civil Grading and Drainage Jay Engstrom, P.E. Crystal River Civil, LLC COA- HPO Site Visit08/22/21 Jeffrey H. Woodruff AIA, LEED AP Cloud Hill Design, LLC Snowmass Snowmass CO 81654 USA COA- HPC Conceptual02/26/22 COA- HPC Conceptual04/27/22 A A B B C C D D E E 4 4 3 3 2 2 1 1 3 Z003 2 Z004 3 Z004 2 A204 11'-5 1/16" KITCHEN BATH BEDROOM LIVING ROOM F.P. BEDROOM CLOSET DOWN DOWN N SCALE: 1/4" = 1'-0" 1 Second Floor Existing A107 79 SHEET TITLE INTEGRATED DESIGN TEAM PROJECT NO: MODEL FILE: DRAWN BY: COPYRIGHT: SHEET 20 A108 Jeffrey H Woodruff 312_W_Hyman_06102022.pln Project No. 116 /Users/jeffrey/Documents/Cloud Hill/312 06 22/312_W_Hyman_06102022.plnPowder Day Skiiing, LLC, David A Tarrab Mees Roof Plan Existing 312 W Hyman Ave 312 W Hyman Ave Lots P+Q, Block 46 Aspen CO 81611 USA/ Pitkin County UGB, City of Aspen 312 W Hyman Ave Aspen CO 81611 USA Account # R000145 Parcel ID # 273512464006 Landscape Architect Jennifer M. Dolecki-Smith, RLA Escape Garden Design, LLC Interior Design Travis Terry Travis Terry Design Contractor (At Final) Structural Engineer (As per contractor) Civil Grading and Drainage Jay Engstrom, P.E. Crystal River Civil, LLC COA- HPO Site Visit08/22/21 Jeffrey H. Woodruff AIA, LEED AP Cloud Hill Design, LLC Snowmass Snowmass CO 81654 USA COA- HPC Conceptual02/26/22 COA- HPC Conceptual04/27/22 A A B B C C D D E E 4 4 3 3 2 2 1 1 3 Z003 2 Z004 3 Z004 2 A204 3.5:12 3.5:12 3.5:12 3.5:12 SCALE: 1/4" = 1'-0" 1 Roof Existing A108 80 SHEET TITLE INTEGRATED DESIGN TEAM PROJECT NO: MODEL FILE: DRAWN BY: COPYRIGHT: SHEET 21 SD21 Jeffrey H Woodruff 312_W_Hyman_06102022.pln Project No. 116 /Users/jeffrey/Documents/Cloud Hill/312 06 22/312_W_Hyman_06102022.plnPowder Day Skiiing, LLC, David A Tarrab Mees Travis Main 312 W Hyman Ave 312 W Hyman Ave Lots P+Q, Block 46 Aspen CO 81611 USA/ Pitkin County UGB, City of Aspen 312 W Hyman Ave Aspen CO 81611 USA Account # R000145 Parcel ID # 273512464006 Landscape Architect Jennifer M. Dolecki-Smith, RLA Escape Garden Design, LLC Interior Design Travis Terry Travis Terry Design Contractor (At Final) Structural Engineer (As per contractor) Civil Grading and Drainage Jay Engstrom, P.E. Crystal River Civil, LLC COA- HPO Site Visit08/22/21 Jeffrey H. Woodruff AIA, LEED AP Cloud Hill Design, LLC Snowmass Snowmass CO 81654 USA COA- HPC Conceptual02/26/22 COA- HPC Conceptual04/27/22 W 2E2'-8" 3'-10"Sill 5'-7 5/64"D 1E8'-0" 3'-0" W 4E2'-8"3'-10"Sill 4'-5" W 3E2'-8"2'-1"Sill 4'-5" D 3E6'-5"7'-9"D 2E6'-5"7'-9"W 18N4'-0" 4'-3"Sill 3'-6"D 1N 7'-6"6'-0"W 1 7 N 4'-0"3'-0"Sill 4 ' - 3 " D 4N 6'-5"7'-9"D 5N 6'-5"7'-9"W 1N5'-0" 2'-6"Sill 2'-6"W 1 9 N 4'-0"4'-3"Sill 4 ' - 3 " D 25 N 8'-0"3'-0"D 23 N 7'-0"10'-0"D 24 N 6'-3"5'-0"W 6E2'-8" 3'-10"Sill 5'-0"W 5E2'-8" 3'-10"Sill 5'-0"D 6N7'-6" 3'-6"D 10N7'-0" 2'-10"W 6E4'-0" 2'-0"Sill 3'-6"D 1N 7'-6"6'-0"D 3N2'-9" 3'-0"D 4N6'-8" 4'-0" D 4N8'-0"2'-2"D 0N8'-0"2'-4"D 7N 8'-0"2'-0"D 8N8'-0" 2'-6"D 1N8'-0" 2'-2"D 3N8'-0" 2'-6"D 6N8'-0" 2'-4" D 2N8'-0"2'-6"D 9N8'-0" 2'-6" A B C D E 4 4 3 3 2 2 1 1 F/R16'-4 5 / 8 "20'-4"8'-2 1 7 / 6 4 "43'-0"32'-7"23'-9"16'-3"1'-6 2 1 / 3 2 " 2'-4 7 / 8 "5'-0 1/8"11'-8 5 / 3 2 " 8'-2"10'-2"10'-0"4'-3"9'-0"11'-9"19'-3"32'-7"3'-0"2'-6"2'-0"100' = 7901.31' 100' 100' = 7901.31' 4 Z004 1 A301 2 A301 2 A210 1 A211 3 A211 4 A211 Plaster covered CMU wall with two layers of 5/8" Type X Gypsum, 1 hour fire wall, Cementitious soffit Proposed fence at the 5' side setback and 5' rear setback, lined on the South with shrubs, see landscaping plan St Moritz R e t a i n i n g w a l l (existing a n d u n d e r rehabilitati o n ) Removal of T r e e # 2 Removal of T r e e # 1 UP bedroom #2 bathe #3 mechanical boot c u b b i e s trash , c o m p o s t , r e c y c l i n g bathe #2 closet boot c u b b i e s & be n c h bedroom #3 main entry heat pumps (2) electric meters (2) gas & radon egress egress egress entry/mud w/d garden storage 1/2 bathe 1 A300 1 A200 2 A200 2 Z003 2 A300 SCALE: 1/4" = 1'-0" 1 First Floor SD21 81 SHEET TITLE INTEGRATED DESIGN TEAM PROJECT NO: MODEL FILE: DRAWN BY: COPYRIGHT: SHEET 22 SD22 Jeffrey H Woodruff 312_W_Hyman_06102022.pln Project No. 116 /Users/jeffrey/Documents/Cloud Hill/312 06 22/312_W_Hyman_06102022.plnPowder Day Skiiing, LLC, David A Tarrab Mees Travis Second 312 W Hyman Ave 312 W Hyman Ave Lots P+Q, Block 46 Aspen CO 81611 USA/ Pitkin County UGB, City of Aspen 312 W Hyman Ave Aspen CO 81611 USA Account # R000145 Parcel ID # 273512464006 Landscape Architect Jennifer M. Dolecki-Smith, RLA Escape Garden Design, LLC Interior Design Travis Terry Travis Terry Design Contractor (At Final) Structural Engineer (As per contractor) Civil Grading and Drainage Jay Engstrom, P.E. Crystal River Civil, LLC COA- HPO Site Visit08/22/21 Jeffrey H. Woodruff AIA, LEED AP Cloud Hill Design, LLC Snowmass Snowmass CO 81654 USA COA- HPC Conceptual02/26/22 COA- HPC Conceptual04/27/22 W 11E4'-0" 7'-0"Sill 2'-4"W 8N2'-0" 6'-0"Sill 4'-6"W 13N3'-0"2'-0"Sill -1'-0 1/8"W 15E3'-6" 6'-0"Sill 3'-0"W 16E3'-6" 6'-0"Sill 3'-0"W 12E5'-0"7'-0"Sill 1'-4" W 14E5'-0"7'-0"Sill 1'-4" D 22E 6'-6"3'-0"W 0N4'-0" 3'-0"Sill 3'-0"W 0N4'-0" 3'-0"Sill 3'-0"D 1N7'-0" 5'-0"D 19N6'-8" 3'-0" D 20N 8'-0"2'-6"W 7N 4'-0"1'-2"Sill 3'-0" W 7N 4'-6"2'-0"Sill 2'-6" W 9N 4'-6"2'-0"Sill 2'-6" D 18N 8'-0"2'-10"W 7N2'-0" 2'-0"Sill 5'-0"D 18N8'-0"2'-0"D 18N8'-0"2'-0"A A B B C C D D E E 4 4 3 3 2 2 1 1 FDWRE R4 Z004 1 A301 2 A301 2 A210 8'-2"10'-2"10'-0"4'-3"9'-0"11'-9"19'-3"32'-7"40'-0"11'-2 31/32" 9'-3" 9'-3" 1 A300 1 A200 2 A200 2 Z003 2 A300 kitchen bathe #1 living room down deck deck fireplace bedroom 1 closetegress down SCALE: 1/4" = 1'-0" 1 Second Floor SD22 82 SHEET TITLE INTEGRATED DESIGN TEAM PROJECT NO: MODEL FILE: DRAWN BY: COPYRIGHT: SHEET 23 A200 Jeffrey H Woodruff 312_W_Hyman_06102022.pln Project No. 116 /Users/jeffrey/Documents/Cloud Hill/312 06 22/312_W_Hyman_06102022.plnPowder Day Skiiing, LLC, David A Tarrab Mees Elevations Proposed 312 W Hyman Ave 312 W Hyman Ave Lots P+Q, Block 46 Aspen CO 81611 USA/ Pitkin County UGB, City of Aspen 312 W Hyman Ave Aspen CO 81611 USA Account # R000145 Parcel ID # 273512464006 Landscape Architect Jennifer M. Dolecki-Smith, RLA Escape Garden Design, LLC Interior Design Travis Terry Travis Terry Design Contractor (At Final) Structural Engineer (As per contractor) Civil Grading and Drainage Jay Engstrom, P.E. Crystal River Civil, LLC COA- HPO Site Visit08/22/21 Jeffrey H. Woodruff AIA, LEED AP Cloud Hill Design, LLC Snowmass Snowmass CO 81654 USA COA- HPC Conceptual02/26/22 COA- HPC Conceptual04/27/22 ±0" 1 First Floor ±0" 1 First Floor +9'-3" 2 Second Floor +9'-3" 2 Second Floor +18'-3" 3 Roof +18'-3" 3 Roof New Wood Existing Wood New CMU Existing Wood Existing Synthetic Treads ±0" 1 First Floor +9'-3" 2 Second Floor +18'-3" 3 Roof Existing Wood Existing CMU New CMU New Wood Balcony Existing Standing Seam New Wood New WoodNew Stucco New Skylights New Masonry New CMU New Storage SCALE: 1/4" = 1'-0" 1 North Elevation A200 SCALE: 1/4" = 1'-0" 2 East Elevation A200 83 SHEET TITLE INTEGRATED DESIGN TEAM PROJECT NO: MODEL FILE: DRAWN BY: COPYRIGHT: SHEET 24 A201 Jeffrey H Woodruff 312_W_Hyman_06102022.pln Project No. 116 /Users/jeffrey/Documents/Cloud Hill/312 06 22/312_W_Hyman_06102022.plnPowder Day Skiiing, LLC, David A Tarrab Mees Elevations Proposed 312 W Hyman Ave 312 W Hyman Ave Lots P+Q, Block 46 Aspen CO 81611 USA/ Pitkin County UGB, City of Aspen 312 W Hyman Ave Aspen CO 81611 USA Account # R000145 Parcel ID # 273512464006 Landscape Architect Jennifer M. Dolecki-Smith, RLA Escape Garden Design, LLC Interior Design Travis Terry Travis Terry Design Contractor (At Final) Structural Engineer (As per contractor) Civil Grading and Drainage Jay Engstrom, P.E. Crystal River Civil, LLC COA- HPO Site Visit08/22/21 Jeffrey H. Woodruff AIA, LEED AP Cloud Hill Design, LLC Snowmass Snowmass CO 81654 USA COA- HPC Conceptual02/26/22 COA- HPC Conceptual04/27/22 ±0" 1 First Floor ±0" 1 First Floor +9'-3" 2 Second Floor +9'-3" 2 Second Floor +18'-3" 3 Roof +18'-3" 3 Roof Existing CMU Existing Wood Eave Triangular Fenestration, As per revised guidance ±0" 1 First Floor +9'-3" 2 Second Floor +18'-3" 3 Roof 22'-1 5/16" 25'-0" 12'-0 15/32" Existing WoodNew Wood Existing Opening Existing Wood Existing CMU Existing CMU New Stucco New Standing Seam SCALE: 1/4" = 1'-0" 1 South Elevation A201 SCALE: 1/4" = 1'-0" 2 West Elevation A201 84 SHEET TITLE INTEGRATED DESIGN TEAM PROJECT NO: MODEL FILE: DRAWN BY: COPYRIGHT: SHEET 25 A203 Jeffrey H Woodruff 312_W_Hyman_06102022.pln Project No. 116 /Users/jeffrey/Documents/Cloud Hill/312 06 22/312_W_Hyman_06102022.plnPowder Day Skiiing, LLC, David A Tarrab Mees Existing Elevations 312 W Hyman Ave 312 W Hyman Ave Lots P+Q, Block 46 Aspen CO 81611 USA/ Pitkin County UGB, City of Aspen 312 W Hyman Ave Aspen CO 81611 USA Account # R000145 Parcel ID # 273512464006 Landscape Architect Jennifer M. Dolecki-Smith, RLA Escape Garden Design, LLC Interior Design Travis Terry Travis Terry Design Contractor (At Final) Structural Engineer (As per contractor) Civil Grading and Drainage Jay Engstrom, P.E. Crystal River Civil, LLC COA- HPO Site Visit08/22/21 Jeffrey H. Woodruff AIA, LEED AP Cloud Hill Design, LLC Snowmass Snowmass CO 81654 USA COA- HPC Conceptual02/26/22 COA- HPC Conceptual04/27/22 ±0" 1 First Floor ±0" 1 First Floor +9'-3" 2 Second Floor +9'-3" 2 Second Floor +18'-3" 3 Roof +18'-3" 3 Roof ±0" 1 First Floor ±0" 1 First Floor +9'-3" 2 Second Floor +9'-3" 2 Second Floor +18'-3" 3 Roof +18'-3" 3 Roof SCALE: 1/4" = 1'-0" 1 Existing North Elevation A203 SCALE: 1/4" = 1'-0" 2 Existing East Elevation A203 SCALE: 1:0.33 3 312wHyman_WEB303 A203 SCALE: 1:0.33 4 312wHyman_WEB304 A203 85 SHEET TITLE INTEGRATED DESIGN TEAM PROJECT NO: MODEL FILE: DRAWN BY: COPYRIGHT: SHEET 26 A204 Jeffrey H Woodruff 312_W_Hyman_06102022.pln Project No. 116 /Users/jeffrey/Documents/Cloud Hill/312 06 22/312_W_Hyman_06102022.plnPowder Day Skiiing, LLC, David A Tarrab Mees Existing Elevations 312 W Hyman Ave 312 W Hyman Ave Lots P+Q, Block 46 Aspen CO 81611 USA/ Pitkin County UGB, City of Aspen 312 W Hyman Ave Aspen CO 81611 USA Account # R000145 Parcel ID # 273512464006 Landscape Architect Jennifer M. Dolecki-Smith, RLA Escape Garden Design, LLC Interior Design Travis Terry Travis Terry Design Contractor (At Final) Structural Engineer (As per contractor) Civil Grading and Drainage Jay Engstrom, P.E. Crystal River Civil, LLC COA- HPO Site Visit08/22/21 Jeffrey H. Woodruff AIA, LEED AP Cloud Hill Design, LLC Snowmass Snowmass CO 81654 USA COA- HPC Conceptual02/26/22 COA- HPC Conceptual04/27/22 ±0" 1 First Floor ±0" 1 First Floor +9'-3" 2 Second Floor +9'-3" 2 Second Floor +18'-3" 3 Roof +18'-3" 3 Roof 18'-3 1 / 2 " 19'-7 1/16"19'-7 1/16"25'-0"Existing Grade (Most Restrictive) 1 2 3 4 ±0" 1 First Floor ±0" 1 First Floor +9'-3" 2 Second Floor +9'-3" 2 Second Floor +18'-3" 3 Roof +18'-3" 3 Roof SCALE: 1/4" = 1'-0" 1 Existing South Elevation A204 SCALE: 1/4" = 1'-0" 2 Existing West Elevation A204 SCALE: 1:0.27 3 312wHyman_WEB301 A204 SCALE: 1:0.26 4 312wHyman_WEB302 A204 86 SHEET TITLE INTEGRATED DESIGN TEAM PROJECT NO: MODEL FILE: DRAWN BY: COPYRIGHT: SHEET 27 A210 Jeffrey H Woodruff 312_W_Hyman_06102022.pln Project No. 116 /Users/jeffrey/Documents/Cloud Hill/312 06 22/312_W_Hyman_06102022.plnPowder Day Skiiing, LLC, David A Tarrab Mees Fence Layout 312 W Hyman Ave 312 W Hyman Ave Lots P+Q, Block 46 Aspen CO 81611 USA/ Pitkin County UGB, City of Aspen 312 W Hyman Ave Aspen CO 81611 USA Account # R000145 Parcel ID # 273512464006 Landscape Architect Jennifer M. Dolecki-Smith, RLA Escape Garden Design, LLC Interior Design Travis Terry Travis Terry Design Contractor (At Final) Structural Engineer (As per contractor) Civil Grading and Drainage Jay Engstrom, P.E. Crystal River Civil, LLC COA- HPO Site Visit08/22/21 Jeffrey H. Woodruff AIA, LEED AP Cloud Hill Design, LLC Snowmass Snowmass CO 81654 USA COA- HPC Conceptual02/26/22 COA- HPC Conceptual04/27/22 1,210.5 sq ft A A B B C C D D E E 4 4 3 3 2 2 1 1 1.55 5 ' 2.40 6 '5.011'11.6 8 ' 8.167'10.167'10'4.25'9'11.749'19.25'5.00 1 '11.313'308 sq ft Proposed fence at the 5' side setback and 5' rear setback, lined on the South with shrubs, see landscaping plan St Moritz R e t a i n i n g w a l l ( e x i s t i n g and under r e h a b i l i t a t i o n ) Removal of T r e e # 2 Removal of T r e e # 1 E EG OS W7904790379027901 7901 7901 790179 0 2 7902 790379 0 3 7 9 0 4 10' R E A R S E T B A C K - P R I N C I P A L B U I L D I N G 5' R E A R S E T B A C K - P R I N C I P A L B U I L D I N G U S E D A S G A R A G E & AC C E S S O R Y B U I L D I N G 5' MINIMUM SIDE SETBACK10' F R O N T S E T B A C K PRI N C I P A L B U I L D I N G 15' F R O N T S E T B A C K ACC E S S O R Y B U I L D I N G ±0.000' 1 First Floor ±0.000' 1 First Floor +9.250' 2 Second Floor +9.250' 2 Second Floor +18.250' 3 Roof +18.250' 3 Roof 6'31.35' New 6" WoodNew Stucco N SCALE: 1/16" = 1'-0" 1 Architectural Site Plan A210 SCALE: 1/4" = 1'-0" 2 Garage South Elevation A210 87 SHEET TITLE INTEGRATED DESIGN TEAM PROJECT NO: MODEL FILE: DRAWN BY: COPYRIGHT: SHEET 28 A211 Jeffrey H Woodruff 312_W_Hyman_06102022.pln Project No. 116 /Users/jeffrey/Documents/Cloud Hill/312 06 22/312_W_Hyman_06102022.plnPowder Day Skiiing, LLC, David A Tarrab Mees Garage Elevations 312 W Hyman Ave 312 W Hyman Ave Lots P+Q, Block 46 Aspen CO 81611 USA/ Pitkin County UGB, City of Aspen 312 W Hyman Ave Aspen CO 81611 USA Account # R000145 Parcel ID # 273512464006 Landscape Architect Jennifer M. Dolecki-Smith, RLA Escape Garden Design, LLC Interior Design Travis Terry Travis Terry Design Contractor (At Final) Structural Engineer (As per contractor) Civil Grading and Drainage Jay Engstrom, P.E. Crystal River Civil, LLC COA- HPO Site Visit08/22/21 Jeffrey H. Woodruff AIA, LEED AP Cloud Hill Design, LLC Snowmass Snowmass CO 81654 USA COA- HPC Conceptual02/26/22 COA- HPC Conceptual04/27/22 ±0" 1 First Floor +9'-3" 2 Second Floor +18'-3" 3 Roof ±0" 1 First Floor +9'-3" 2 Second Floor +18'-3" 3 Roof 6'-0"31'-4 13/64" New 6" WoodNew Stucco ±0" 1 First Floor ±0" 1 First Floor +9'-3" 2 Second Floor +9'-3" 2 Second Floor +18'-3" 3 Roof +18'-3" 3 Roof ±0" 1 First Floor +9'-3" 2 Second Floor +18'-3" 3 Roof SCALE: 1/4" = 1'-0" 1 Garage Elevation North A211 SCALE: 1/4" = 1'-0" 2 Garage South Elevation A211 SCALE: 1/4" = 1'-0" 3 East Elevation A211 SCALE: 1/4" = 1'-0" 4 West Elevation A211 88 SHEET TITLE INTEGRATED DESIGN TEAM PROJECT NO: MODEL FILE: DRAWN BY: COPYRIGHT: SHEET 29 A300 Jeffrey H Woodruff 312_W_Hyman_06102022.pln Project No. 116 /Users/jeffrey/Documents/Cloud Hill/312 06 22/312_W_Hyman_06102022.plnPowder Day Skiiing, LLC, David A Tarrab Mees Transverse Sections 312 W Hyman Ave 312 W Hyman Ave Lots P+Q, Block 46 Aspen CO 81611 USA/ Pitkin County UGB, City of Aspen 312 W Hyman Ave Aspen CO 81611 USA Account # R000145 Parcel ID # 273512464006 Landscape Architect Jennifer M. Dolecki-Smith, RLA Escape Garden Design, LLC Interior Design Travis Terry Travis Terry Design Contractor (At Final) Structural Engineer (As per contractor) Civil Grading and Drainage Jay Engstrom, P.E. Crystal River Civil, LLC COA- HPO Site Visit08/22/21 Jeffrey H. Woodruff AIA, LEED AP Cloud Hill Design, LLC Snowmass Snowmass CO 81654 USA COA- HPC Conceptual02/26/22 COA- HPC Conceptual04/27/22 E D C B A ±0" 1 First Floor E D C B A ±0" 1 First Floor SCALE: 1/4" = 1'-0" 1 transverse at Stairs A300SCALE: 1/4" = 1'-0" 2 transverse at Bedroom #2 A300 89 SHEET TITLE INTEGRATED DESIGN TEAM PROJECT NO: MODEL FILE: DRAWN BY: COPYRIGHT: SHEET 30 A301 Jeffrey H Woodruff 312_W_Hyman_06102022.pln Project No. 116 /Users/jeffrey/Documents/Cloud Hill/312 06 22/312_W_Hyman_06102022.plnPowder Day Skiiing, LLC, David A Tarrab Mees Longitudinal Sections 312 W Hyman Ave 312 W Hyman Ave Lots P+Q, Block 46 Aspen CO 81611 USA/ Pitkin County UGB, City of Aspen 312 W Hyman Ave Aspen CO 81611 USA Account # R000145 Parcel ID # 273512464006 Landscape Architect Jennifer M. Dolecki-Smith, RLA Escape Garden Design, LLC Interior Design Travis Terry Travis Terry Design Contractor (At Final) Structural Engineer (As per contractor) Civil Grading and Drainage Jay Engstrom, P.E. Crystal River Civil, LLC COA- HPO Site Visit08/22/21 Jeffrey H. Woodruff AIA, LEED AP Cloud Hill Design, LLC Snowmass Snowmass CO 81654 USA COA- HPC Conceptual02/26/22 COA- HPC Conceptual04/27/22 ±0" 1 First Floor +9'-3" 2 Second Floor +18'-3" 3 Roof 4 3 2 1 ±0" 1 First Floor +9'-3" 2 Second Floor +18'-3" 3 Roof 4'-4"garden storage bedroom # 2 casework SCALE: 1/4" = 1'-0" 1 Longitudinal at Stairs A301 SCALE: 1/4" = 1'-0" 2 longitudinal at Bedroom #2 and Garden Storage A301 90 SHEET TITLE INTEGRATED DESIGN TEAM PROJECT NO: MODEL FILE: DRAWN BY: COPYRIGHT: SHEET 31 A500 Jeffrey H Woodruff 312_W_Hyman_06102022.pln Project No. 116 /Users/jeffrey/Documents/Cloud Hill/312 06 22/312_W_Hyman_06102022.plnPowder Day Skiiing, LLC, David A Tarrab Mees Schedules 312 W Hyman Ave 312 W Hyman Ave Lots P+Q, Block 46 Aspen CO 81611 USA/ Pitkin County UGB, City of Aspen 312 W Hyman Ave Aspen CO 81611 USA Account # R000145 Parcel ID # 273512464006 Landscape Architect Jennifer M. Dolecki-Smith, RLA Escape Garden Design, LLC Interior Design Travis Terry Travis Terry Design Contractor (At Final) Structural Engineer (As per contractor) Civil Grading and Drainage Jay Engstrom, P.E. Crystal River Civil, LLC COA- HPO Site Visit08/22/21 Jeffrey H. Woodruff AIA, LEED AP Cloud Hill Design, LLC Snowmass Snowmass CO 81654 USA COA- HPC Conceptual02/26/22 COA- HPC Conceptual04/27/22 WINDOW TYPE Fixed Fixed Fixed Fixed Fixed Fixed VIEW DIMENSIONS 1'-0"×1'-0"1'-2"×4'-0"2'-0"×2'-0"2'-0"×2'-6"2'-0"×3'-0"2'-0"×4'-0" NOTES WINDOW LEGEND WINDOW SCHEDULE WINDOW NUMBER ROOM ID W 0N W 0N W 0N W 1N W 2E W 3E W 4E W 5E W 6E W 6E W 7N W 7N W 7N W 8N W 8N W 9N W 11E W 12E W 13N W 14E W 15E W 16E W 17N W 18N W 19N ROOM NAME WIDOW SIZE NOMINAL WIDTH 3'-0" 3'-0" 6'-0" 2'-6" 3'-10" 2'-1" 3'-10" 3'-10" 3'-10" 2'-0" 2'-0" 1'-2" 2'-0" 6'-0" 6'-0" 2'-0" 7'-0" 7'-0" 2'-0" 7'-0" 6'-0" 6'-0" 3'-0" 4'-3" 4'-3" NOMINAL HEIGHT 4'-0" 4'-0" 2'-0" 5'-0" 2'-8" 2'-8" 2'-8" 2'-8" 2'-8" 4'-0" 2'-0" 4'-0" 4'-6" 2'-0" 2'-0" 4'-6" 4'-0" 5'-0" 3'-0" 5'-0" 3'-6" 3'-6" 4'-0" 4'-0" 4'-0" TYPE Fixed Fixed Fixed Fixed Fixed Fixed Fixed Fixed Fixed Fixed Fixed Fixed Fixed Fixed Fixed Fixed Fixed Fixed Fixed Fixed Fixed Fixed Fixed Fixed Fixed HEAD DETAIL JAMB DETAIL SILL DETAIL ACCESORIES STC U-VALUE .29/.36 .29/.36 .29/.36 .29/.36 Single Single Single Single Single Single .29/.36 .29/.36 .29/.36 .29/.36 .29/.36 .29/.36 Single Single .29/.36 Single Single Single .29/.36 .29/.36 .29/.36 TEMPERED <Undefined> <Undefined> <Undefined> <Undefined> <Undefined> <Undefined> <Undefined> <Undefined> <Undefined> <Undefined> <Undefined> <Undefined> <Undefined> <Undefined> <Undefined> <Undefined> <Undefined> <Undefined> <Undefined> <Undefined> <Undefined> <Undefined> <Undefined> <Undefined> <Undefined> REMARKS SCALE: 1' = 1'-0" 1 Window Legend A500 SCALE: 1' = 1'-0" 2 Window Schedule A500 91 SHEET TITLE INTEGRATED DESIGN TEAM PROJECT NO: MODEL FILE: DRAWN BY: COPYRIGHT: SHEET 32 A501 Jeffrey H Woodruff 312_W_Hyman_06102022.pln Project No. 116 /Users/jeffrey/Documents/Cloud Hill/312 06 22/312_W_Hyman_06102022.plnPowder Day Skiiing, LLC, David A Tarrab Mees Schedules 312 W Hyman Ave 312 W Hyman Ave Lots P+Q, Block 46 Aspen CO 81611 USA/ Pitkin County UGB, City of Aspen 312 W Hyman Ave Aspen CO 81611 USA Account # R000145 Parcel ID # 273512464006 Landscape Architect Jennifer M. Dolecki-Smith, RLA Escape Garden Design, LLC Interior Design Travis Terry Travis Terry Design Contractor (At Final) Structural Engineer (As per contractor) Civil Grading and Drainage Jay Engstrom, P.E. Crystal River Civil, LLC COA- HPO Site Visit08/22/21 Jeffrey H. Woodruff AIA, LEED AP Cloud Hill Design, LLC Snowmass Snowmass CO 81654 USA COA- HPC Conceptual02/26/22 COA- HPC Conceptual04/27/22 TYPE Flush Flush Flush Flush Flush Flush Flush VIEW DIMENSIONS 2'-0"×8'-0"2'-10"×7'-0"2'-10"×8'-0"2'-2"×8'-0"2'-4"×8'-0"2'-6"×8'-0"3'-0"×2'-9" NOTES DOOR LEGEND DOOR SCHEDULE DOOR NUMBER ROOM ID D 0N D 1E D 1N D 1N D 1N D 1N D 2E D 2N D 3E D 3N D 3N D 4N D 4N D 4N D 5N D 6N D 6N D 7N D 8N D 9N D 10N D 18N D 18N D 18N D 19N D 20N D 22E D 23N D 24N D 25N D-114a D-116a D-116a ROOM NAME DOOR LEAF NOMINAL WIDTH 2'-4" 3'-0" 5'-0" 6'-0" 6'-0" 2'-2" 7'-9" 2'-6" 7'-9" 3'-0" 2'-6" 7'-9" 2'-2" 4'-0" 7'-9" 3'-6" 2'-4" 2'-0" 2'-6" 2'-6" 2'-10" 2'-10" 2'-0" 2'-0" 3'-0" 2'-6" 3'-0" 10'-0" 5'-0" 3'-0" 3'-0" 2'-9" 2'-9" NOMINAL HEIGHT 8'-0" 8'-0" 7'-0" 7'-6" 7'-6" 8'-0" 6'-5" 8'-0" 6'-5" 2'-9" 8'-0" 6'-5" 8'-0" 6'-8" 6'-5" 7'-6" 8'-0" 8'-0" 8'-0" 8'-0" 7'-0" 8'-0" 8'-0" 8'-0" 6'-8" 8'-0" 6'-6" 7'-0" 6'-3" 8'-0" 7'-0" 7'-0" 7'-0" LEAF THICKNESS 1 3/4" 1 3/4" 1 3/8" 1 3/4" 1 3/4" 1 3/4" 1 3/4" 1 3/4" 1 3/4" 1 3/4" 1 3/4" 1 3/4" 1 3/4" 1 3/4" 1 3/4" 1 3/4" 1 3/4" 1 3/4" 1 3/4" 1 3/4" 1 3/4" 1 3/4" 1 3/4" 1 3/4" 1 3/4" 1 3/4" 1 3/4" 1 3/4" 1 3/4" 1 3/4" 1 3/4" 1 3/4" 1 3/4" MATERIAL Undefined Undefined Undefined Undefined Undefined Undefined Undefined Undefined Undefined Undefined Undefined Undefined Undefined Undefined Undefined Undefined Undefined Undefined Undefined Undefined Undefined Undefined Undefined Undefined Undefined Undefined Undefined Undefined Undefined Undefined Undefined Undefined Undefined TYPE HEAD DETAIL JAMB DETAIL SILL DETAIL HARD WARE SET ACCESORIES RATINGS FIRE <Undefined> <Undefined> <Undefined> <Undefined> <Undefined> <Undefined> <Undefined> <Undefined> <Undefined> <Undefined> <Undefined> <Undefined> <Undefined> <Undefined> <Undefined> <Undefined> <Undefined> <Undefined> <Undefined> <Undefined> <Undefined> <Undefined> <Undefined> <Undefined> <Undefined> <Undefined> <Undefined> <Undefined> <Undefined> <Undefined> <Undefined> <Undefined> <Undefined> STC REMARKS Width, Matches Width of Exiting/Historic Fenestration/Doors on the South and East facades SCALE: 1' = 1'-0" 1 Door Legend A501 SCALE: 1:0.95 2 Door Schedule A501 92 SHEET TITLE INTEGRATED DESIGN TEAM PROJECT NO: MODEL FILE: DRAWN BY: COPYRIGHT: SHEET 33 A600 Jeffrey H Woodruff 312_W_Hyman_06102022.pln Project No. 116 /Users/jeffrey/Documents/Cloud Hill/312 06 22/312_W_Hyman_06102022.plnPowder Day Skiiing, LLC, David A Tarrab Mees Assemblies 312 W Hyman Ave 312 W Hyman Ave Lots P+Q, Block 46 Aspen CO 81611 USA/ Pitkin County UGB, City of Aspen 312 W Hyman Ave Aspen CO 81611 USA Account # R000145 Parcel ID # 273512464006 Landscape Architect Jennifer M. Dolecki-Smith, RLA Escape Garden Design, LLC Interior Design Travis Terry Travis Terry Design Contractor (At Final) Structural Engineer (As per contractor) Civil Grading and Drainage Jay Engstrom, P.E. Crystal River Civil, LLC COA- HPO Site Visit08/22/21 Jeffrey H. Woodruff AIA, LEED AP Cloud Hill Design, LLC Snowmass Snowmass CO 81654 USA COA- HPC Conceptual02/26/22 COA- HPC Conceptual04/27/22 5/8" GWB 2X6 FRAMING R-21 BATT STRUCTURAL PLY AIR AND VAPOR BARRIER 1 1/2" RIGID INSUL. W/ 1 X FURRING R-5 AIR SPACE WOOD SIDING TOTAL R-VALUE = 26 W1 5/8" GWB 2X6 FRAMING R-21 BATT STRUCTURAL PLY AIR AND VAPOR BARRIER 1 1/2" RIGID INSUL. W/ 1 X FURRING R-5 AIR SPACE STUCCO TOTAL R-VALUE = 26 W2 ● STANDING SEAM MEMBRANE ROOF ● 1/2" DENSDECK ● 1 1/2" POLYISO RIGID INSUL R7.5 ● 3/4" SHEATHING ● WOOD RAFTERS RE: STRUCT ● SPRAY FOAM (7" @ 6.5R/in) R45.5 ● HAT CHANNELS ● WOOD T&G TOTAL R VALUE = R53 COA DEWPOINT CALCULATOR: R Value of Assembly = 55.32 Temp. of Condensing Surface = 68.9 (must be greater than 41 degrees) R1 5/8" GWB 2X6 FRAMING R-21 BATT STRUCTURAL PLY AIR AND VAPOR BARRIER 1 1/2" RIGID INSUL. W/ 1 X FURRING R-5 AIR SPACE STUCCO TOTAL R-VALUE = 26 W3 SLAB ON GRADE ● 2" RIGID INSULATION ● 15 MIL VAPOR RETARDER ● 4" GRAVEL ● UNDISTURBED OR COMPACTED SUBGRADE F1 ● STANDING SEAM METAL ROOF ● 1/2" DENSDECK ● 1 1/2" POLYISO RIGID INSUL R7.5 ● 3/4" SHEATHING ● WOOD RAFTERS RE: STRUCT ● SPRAY FOAM (7" @ 6.5R/in) R45.5 ● HAT CHANNELS ● GWB TOTAL R VALUE = R53 COA DEWPOINT CALCULATOR: R Value of Assembly = 55.32 Temp. of Condensing Surface = 68.9 (must be greater than 41 degrees) R2 ● CARPET AND PAD ● 3/4" PLYWOOD(UNDERLAYMENT GRADE) ● 1X2 SLEEPERS ● 2" RIGID INSULATION ● 15 MIL VAPOR RETARDER ● 4" GRAVEL ● UNDISTURBED OR COMPACTED SUBGRADE F2 5/8" GWB (or two layers Type X for Garage) CMU Block (filled) STRUCTURAL PLY AIR AND VAPOR BARRIER 1 1/2" RIGID INSUL. W/ 1 X FURRING R-5 AIR SPACE STUCCO TOTAL R-VALUE = 26 (tbc) W3 (W3 Garage, 1 Hour Firewall) SCALE: 1" = 1'-0" 1 Assemblies A600 93 SHEET TITLE INTEGRATED DESIGN TEAM PROJECT NO: MODEL FILE: DRAWN BY: COPYRIGHT: SHEET 34 A700 Jeffrey H Woodruff 312_W_Hyman_06102022.pln Project No. 116 /Users/jeffrey/Documents/Cloud Hill/312 06 22/312_W_Hyman_06102022.plnPowder Day Skiiing, LLC, David A Tarrab Mees HP HPO Materials 312 W Hyman Ave 312 W Hyman Ave Lots P+Q, Block 46 Aspen CO 81611 USA/ Pitkin County UGB, City of Aspen 312 W Hyman Ave Aspen CO 81611 USA Account # R000145 Parcel ID # 273512464006 Landscape Architect Jennifer M. Dolecki-Smith, RLA Escape Garden Design, LLC Interior Design Travis Terry Travis Terry Design Contractor (At Final) Structural Engineer (As per contractor) Civil Grading and Drainage Jay Engstrom, P.E. Crystal River Civil, LLC COA- HPO Site Visit08/22/21 Jeffrey H. Woodruff AIA, LEED AP Cloud Hill Design, LLC Snowmass Snowmass CO 81654 USA COA- HPC Conceptual02/26/22 COA- HPC Conceptual04/27/22 Match Existing Green Exterior Cladding (Aluminum, Wood Interior) Existing Exterior Cladding @ Living Level Existing Exterior Cladding @ Eave Existing Exterior Cladding @ Garage Door Existing Exterior Stucco Over CMU @ Main Level Existing Exterior Banister @ Living Level Deck Existing Recycled Decking @ Living Level Deck Match Existing Maroon For Exterior Cladding Replace New Exterior Lighting with Dark Sky Compliant (Down only), Colour TBD Replace Single-Pane Resources with exterior assemblies meeting IECC 2021 or Greater Aluminum Clad, Wood Interior, Divided Light Fenestration Garage, Cedar Siding (Unique, non a historical copy), with exposed concrete at base for moisture protection, Four Candidates to the right Garage, Stucco At Enry (Unique, non a historical copy) DCC Modern Cylinder System Surface, Cord, Stem, Wall Mount Page 12 of 15 © 2022 DMF Lighting. All Rights Reserved. Specifications subject to change without notice. See website for U.S. and international patent information. DMF LIGHTING 1118 E. 223rd St. Carson, CA 90745 323.934.7779 dmflighting.com PHOTOMETRY C0 - C180 C90 - C270cd 1099 lm Values in candela Luminous Intensity Beam Angle: 26° Gamma C 0º 0º3366 5º2967 10º2203 15º1391 20º775 25º419 30º248 35º167 40º119 45º87 50º62 55º43 60º26 65º15 70º7 75º4 80º2 85º1 90º0 Distance from LED Foot Candles Diameter 3’374 1.4' 6’93 2.8' 9’42 4.2' 12’23 5.6' Zone Lumens Luminaire % 0-30 862 78 0-40 971 88 0-60 1078 98 0-90 1098 100 0-180 1099 100 Zonal Lumen Summary Illuminance Chart1600 2400 3200 0°15°30° 45° 60° 75° 90° DC4xxxxD10SPxxxxx30 DCC Fixed, 1000 lm, 3000K, Spot C0 - C180 C90 - C270cd 1132 lm Values in candela Luminous Intensity Beam Angle: 14° Gamma C 0º 0º9823 5º6600 10º2335 15º734 20º357 25º244 30º195 35º159 40º116 45º85 50º61 55º42 60º28 65º16 70º7 75º4 80º2 85º1 90º0 Distance from LED Foot Candles Diameter 3’1091 0.7' 6’273 1.5' 9’121 2.2' 12’68 2.9' Zone Lumens Luminaire % 0-30 906 80 0-40 1004 89 0-60 1110 98 0-90 1131 100 0-180 1132 100 Zonal Lumen Summary Illuminance Chart 4000 6000 8000 0°15°30° 45° 60° 75° 90° DC4xxxxD10NSxxxxx30 DCC Fixed, 1000 lm, 3000K, Narrow Spot Page 13 of 15 © 2022 DMF Lighting. All Rights Reserved. Specifications subject to change without notice. See website for U.S. and international patent information. DMF LIGHTING 1118 E. 223rd St. Carson, CA 90745 323.934.7779 dmflighting.com DCC LED Cylinder Surface, Cord, Stem, Wall Mount PHOTOMETRY C0 - C180 C90 - C270cd 1071 lm Values in candela Luminous Intensity Beam Angle: 55° Gamma C 0º 0º1100 5º1058 10º973 15º866 20º743 25º609 30º478 35º361 40º252 45º161 50º102 55º68 60º41 65º24 70º11 75º6 80º4 85º2 90º0 Zone Lumens Luminaire % 0-30 620 58 0-40 845 79 0-60 1037 97 0-90 1069 100 0-180 1071 100 Zonal Lumen Summary Illuminance Chart DC4xxxxD10WFxxxxx30 DCC Fixed, 1000 lm, 3000K, Wide Flood C0 - C180 C90 - C270cd 1083 lm Values in candela Luminous Intensity Beam Angle: 37° Gamma C 0º 0º1890 5º1792 10º1503 15º1161 20º849 25º589 30º391 35º256 40º162 45º107 50º74 55º51 60º30 65º18 70º8 75º5 80º3 85º1 90º0 Zone Lumens Luminaire % 0-30 760 70 0-40 925 85 0-60 1058 98 0-90 1081 100 0-180 1083 100 Zonal Lumen Summary Illuminance Chart DC4xxxxD10FLxxxxx30 DCC Fixed, 1000 lm, 3000K, Flood Distance from LED Foot Candles Diameter 3’210 2.0' 6’52 4.0' 9’23 6.0' 12’13 8.0' 800 1200 1600 2000 0°15°30° 45° 60° 75° 90° 400 600 800 1000 1200 0°15°30° 45° 60° 75° 90° Distance from LED Foot Candles Diameter 3’122 3.1' 6’31 6.2' 9’14 9.3' 12’8 12.3' COA HP HPO Materials WORKSHEET A700 SCALE: 1' = 1'-0" 2 39.DMF_Downlight A700 SCALE: 1' = 1'-0" 3 39.DMFLighting_DCC_SpecSheet A700SCALE: 1' = 1'-0" 4 39.DMFLighting_DCC_SpecSheet A700 The DMF cylinder in Black or Brown (against the wood, or white against the stucco) would be flush mounted using the existing penetrations, maintaining the existing wall penetrations in the CMU and Stucco. The flood would work well on the Patio Walls, whereas the SouthEast Corner would benefit from a spot (reducing/eliminating) light loss near the property line. Light at the property line < .5 Foot Candles as per code. The existing lighting is a mix of jelly jars and exposed lamps. 94 SHEET TITLE INTEGRATED DESIGN TEAM PROJECT NO: MODEL FILE: DRAWN BY: COPYRIGHT: SHEET 35 A900 Jeffrey H Woodruff 312_W_Hyman_06102022.pln Project No. 116 /Users/jeffrey/Documents/Cloud Hill/312 06 22/312_W_Hyman_06102022.plnPowder Day Skiiing, LLC, David A Tarrab Mees Precedent Studies 312 W Hyman Ave 312 W Hyman Ave Lots P+Q, Block 46 Aspen CO 81611 USA/ Pitkin County UGB, City of Aspen 312 W Hyman Ave Aspen CO 81611 USA Account # R000145 Parcel ID # 273512464006 Landscape Architect Jennifer M. Dolecki-Smith, RLA Escape Garden Design, LLC Interior Design Travis Terry Travis Terry Design Contractor (At Final) Structural Engineer (As per contractor) Civil Grading and Drainage Jay Engstrom, P.E. Crystal River Civil, LLC COA- HPO Site Visit08/22/21 Jeffrey H. Woodruff AIA, LEED AP Cloud Hill Design, LLC Snowmass Snowmass CO 81654 USA COA- HPC Conceptual02/26/22 COA- HPC Conceptual04/27/22 Schubertiade GmbH Austria A900 St Moritz (Bays) A900 Tyrolean_House_Hotel Post A900 Decks and Bays A900 SCALE: 1' = 1'-0" 5 Chalet Precendent A900 SCALE: 1' = 1'-0" 6 No longer a cold roof A900 95 SHEET TITLE INTEGRATED DESIGN TEAM PROJECT NO: MODEL FILE: DRAWN BY: COPYRIGHT: SHEET 36 A903 Jeffrey H Woodruff 312_W_Hyman_06102022.pln Project No. 116 /Users/jeffrey/Documents/Cloud Hill/312 06 22/312_W_Hyman_06102022.plnPowder Day Skiiing, LLC, David A Tarrab Mees Relationship to Neighborhood 312 W Hyman Ave 312 W Hyman Ave Lots P+Q, Block 46 Aspen CO 81611 USA/ Pitkin County UGB, City of Aspen 312 W Hyman Ave Aspen CO 81611 USA Account # R000145 Parcel ID # 273512464006 Landscape Architect Jennifer M. Dolecki-Smith, RLA Escape Garden Design, LLC Interior Design Travis Terry Travis Terry Design Contractor (At Final) Structural Engineer (As per contractor) Civil Grading and Drainage Jay Engstrom, P.E. Crystal River Civil, LLC COA- HPO Site Visit08/22/21 Jeffrey H. Woodruff AIA, LEED AP Cloud Hill Design, LLC Snowmass Snowmass CO 81654 USA COA- HPC Conceptual02/26/22 COA- HPC Conceptual04/27/22 SCALE: 6" = 1'-0" 1 Birds Eye view of 312 W Hyman A903 SCALE: 1' = 1'-0" 2 North Drone View A903 SCALE: 1' = 1'-0" 3 South Drone View A903 SCALE: 1' = 1'-0" 4 North Drone View A903 96 SHEET TITLE INTEGRATED DESIGN TEAM PROJECT NO: MODEL FILE: DRAWN BY: COPYRIGHT: SHEET 37 E100 Jeffrey H Woodruff 312_W_Hyman_06102022.pln Project No. 116 /Users/jeffrey/Documents/Cloud Hill/312 06 22/312_W_Hyman_06102022.plnPowder Day Skiiing, LLC, David A Tarrab Mees Electrical 312 W Hyman Ave 312 W Hyman Ave Lots P+Q, Block 46 Aspen CO 81611 USA/ Pitkin County UGB, City of Aspen 312 W Hyman Ave Aspen CO 81611 USA Account # R000145 Parcel ID # 273512464006 Landscape Architect Jennifer M. Dolecki-Smith, RLA Escape Garden Design, LLC Interior Design Travis Terry Travis Terry Design Contractor (At Final) Structural Engineer (As per contractor) Civil Grading and Drainage Jay Engstrom, P.E. Crystal River Civil, LLC COA- HPO Site Visit08/22/21 Jeffrey H. Woodruff AIA, LEED AP Cloud Hill Design, LLC Snowmass Snowmass CO 81654 USA COA- HPC Conceptual02/26/22 COA- HPC Conceptual04/27/22 27 July 2022 To: City of Aspen From: Jeffrey Woodruff, Cloud Hill Design, LLC, rep Powderdayskiing, LLC RE: Electrical service needs at 312 West Hyman, as per HPC conceptual review and follow up Utilities City of Aspen 312 W Hyman Ave #Upst 01-25036520-00 City of Aspen 312 W Hyman Ave #DWST 01-250360-00 Currently we have 300 Amp total building services, far exceeding our current and anticipated needs 312 W Hyman Ave #Upst on a 200 Amp service and  312 W Hyman Ave #DWST on a 100 Amp Efficiency Renewables - Energy Positive- Renewable Electrification (~25-30k available in rebates: City of Aspen, CORE, Federal ITC). No REMP (< 64 SQ FT hot tub, no snowmelt) Building Envelope Building Mechanical Systems- Building Loads Windows- all outmoded, end of useful life single pane with no UV protection. Current ACH > 1.2- would not get a permit today. Thermal loads- assuming two units, need of 40 A/unit Mitsubishi Hyper-Heat Electrical Requirements MXZ-3C30NAHZ2-U1 Power Supply Voltage, Phase, Hertz 208 / 230V, 1-Phase, 60 Hz Recommended Fuse/Breaker Size 40 A MCA 30 A Voltag Indoor - Outdoor S1-S2 A C 208 / 230 Indoor - Outdoor S2-S3 +12 VDC to +24 VDC Kitchen Needs Electric refrigeration -Sub Zero Induction Electric cooking- Aga/Mercury Electrical requirements WasherDryer(s) Hot water heater/heat pump/Energy Star (heat pump/hybrid) water heater Bradford White or AO Smith (and Water Softener) LED lighting and controls all run on < 15 AMP (if all LED) Outdoor energy consumption Fossil fuel needs- outdoor fireplace (why?), outdoor electric space heaters (preferred) Hot tub <64 Sq Ft. (to avoid REMP fees) Eave snowmelt (linear feet, no- historic) Walkway snowmelt (linear feet), can’t we just use low albedo pavers? Onsite renewable energy and storage 12-15 kw array (on garage roof, maybe less depending on year round need, not peak/spike usage) 4-5 Tesla Powerwalls SCALE: 1' = 1'-0" 1 312_W_Hyman_program_needs E100 SCALE: 1' = 1'-0" 2 East Drone View- Current Electrical Service E100 97 PRE-APPLICATION CONFERENCE SUMMARY PLANNER: Natalie Feinberg Lopez, Historic Preservation Officer, natalie.feinberglopez@cityofaspen.com DATE: August 23, 2021 PROPERTY: 312 W. Hyman Avenue, Aspen, CO 81611 REPRESENTATIVE: Patrick Rawley, Stan Clauson Associates, patrick@scaplanning.com REQUEST: Major Development, Historic Preservation Benefits DESCRIPTION: 312 W. Hyman Avenue is a 6,000 square foot lot located in the R-6 zone district. The property is landmarked designated and contains a Chalet style single family home which is relatively unaltered since its construction in 1956. The applicant proposes a side addition to the house, a small two-story addition to fit under the eaves at the West entrance, as well as on the East elevation. Also proposed is single car garage and a small mud room. Garage access from the alley will require removal of trees and has been preliminarily vetted with the Parks Department. For the project to proceed, HPC approval for Major Development is anticipated. Major Development is a two-step process, requiring the approval of Conceptual Design and a Final Design. Conceptual Design review will consider mass, scale, and site plan. At this meeting, HPC may also consider any setback variations or benefits, if requested by the applicant. Following Conceptual, HPC will inform City Council of their decision, allowing them the opportunity to "Call- Up" aspects of the approval. This is a standard practice for all significant projects. Final Design review will consider landscape, lighting, and materials. HPC will use the Historic Preservation Design Guidelines and the Land Use Code Sections that are applicable to this project to assist with their determinations. . Below are links to the Land Use Application form and Land Use Code for your convenience: Historic Preservation Land Use Application Land Use Code Land Use Code Section(s) 26.304 Common Development Review Procedure 26.415.070.D Historic Preservation – Major Development 26.415.110 Historic Preservation – Benefits 26.575.020 Calculations and Measurements 26.710.040 Medium Density Residential (R-6) 98 Review by: Staff for completeness and recommendations HPC for recommendations or decisions City Council for notice of the HPC Conceptual decision. Council has the authority to remand the decision back to HPC for further consideration. Public Hearing: Yes, HPC Planning Fees: $1950 for 6 billable hours of staff time. (Additional/ lesser hours will be billed/ refunded at a rate of $325 per hour.) Staff will seek referral comments from the Building Department, Zoning, Engineering and Parks regarding any relevant code requirements or considerations. There will be no Development Review Committee meeting or referral fees. To apply, email the following information in a single pdf to natalie.feinberglopez@cityofaspen.com: At each review step, please submit one paper copy of the application to the City of Aspen Community Development Department for an initial determination of completeness.  Completed Land Use Application and signed Fee Agreement.  Pre-application Conference Summary (this document).  Street address and legal description of the parcel on which development is proposed to occur, consisting of a current (no older than 6 months) certificate from a title insurance company, an ownership and encumbrance report, or attorney licensed to practice in the State of Colorado, listing the names of all owners of the property, and all mortgages, judgments, liens, easements, contracts and agreements affecting the parcel, and demonstrating the owner’s right to apply for the Development Application.  Applicant’s name, address and telephone number in a letter signed by the applicant that states the name, address and telephone number of the representative authorized to act on behalf of the applicant.  HOA Compliance form (Attached).  List of adjacent property owners for both properties within 300’ for public hearing.  An 8 1/2” by 11” vicinity map locating the parcel within the City of Aspen.  Site improvement survey including topography and vegetation showing the current status, certified by a registered land surveyor, licensed in the state of Colorado.  A written description of the proposal (scope of work) and written explanation of how the proposed development and any requests for variations or benefits complies with the review standards and design guidelines relevant to the application.  A proposed site plan. 99  Scaled drawings of all proposed structure(s) or addition(s) depicting their form, including their height, massing, scale, proportions and roof plan; and the primary features of all elevations.  Supplemental materials to provide a visual description of the context surrounding the designated historic property including photographs and other exhibits, as needed, to accurately depict location and extent of proposed work. For Conceptual, the following items will need to be submitted in addition to the items listed above:  Graphics identifying preliminary selection of primary exterior building materials.  A preliminary stormwater design. For Final Review, the following items will need to be submitted in addition to the items listed above:  Drawings of the street facing facades must be provided at ¼” scale.  Final selection of all exterior materials, and samples or clearly illustrated photographs. Samples are preferred for the presentation to HPC.  A lighting plan and landscape plan, including any visible stormwater mitigation features. Disclaimer: The foregoing summary is advisory in nature only and is not binding on the City. The summary is based on current zoning, which is subject to change in the future, and upon factual representations that may or may not be accurate. The summary does not create a legal or vested right. 100 March 1, 2022 Mr. David Alberto Tarrab Mees Powderdayskiing LLC PO Box 10261 Aspen, CO 81612 david.tarrab@grupottt.net Ms. Natalie Feinberg Lopez City of Aspen Historic Preservation Officer 130 South Galena St., 3rd Floor Aspen, CO 81611 Dear Natalie: This letter is to certify that I, David Alberto Tarrab Mees, Managing Member of POWDER- DAYSKIING LLC, the owner of the property located at 312 W. Hyman Avenue, Aspen, Colorado, will be changing my current representative: From: Stan Clauson Associates, Inc. Patrick S. Rawley, AICP, ASLA Stan Clauson Associates, Inc. 400 W. Main Street, Ste. 203 Aspen, CO 81611 Tel (970) 925-2323 patrick@scaplanning.com To : Cloud Hill Design LLC Jeffrey Woodruff 266 Light Hill Rd Snowmass, CO 81654 jeffrey@cloudhilldesign.com Please permit Jeffrey Woodruff and its staff permission to represent us in discussion with the City of Aspen regarding the application for Major Development, Historic Preservation Benefits. If you should have any questions regarding this matter, please contact us at Cloud Hill Design LLC. Very truly yours, David A. Tarrab Mees Managing Member Powderdayskiing LLC Attachment 12 101 City of Aspen Community Development Department Aspen Historic Preservation Land Use Packet City of Aspen | 130 S. Galena Street. | (970) 920 5090 Historic Land Use Application Requirements, Updated: March, 2020 City Use: Fees Due: $ Received $ Agreement to Pay Application Fees An agreement between the City of Aspen (“City”) and Property Phone No.: Owner (“I”): Email: Address of Billing Property: Address: (Subject of (send bills here) application) I understand that the City has adopted, via Ordinance No., Series of 2011, review fees for Land Use applications and payment of these fees is a condition precedent to determining application completeness. I understand that as the property owner that I am responsible for paying all fees for this development application. For flat fees and referral fees: I agree to pay the following fees for the services indicated. I understand that these flat fees are non-refundable. $ flat fee for $ flat fee for $ flat fee for $ flat fee for For Deposit cases only: The City and I understand that because of the size, nature or scope of the proposed project, it is not possible at this time to know the full extent or total costs involved in processing the application. I understand that additional costs over and above the deposit may accrue. I understand and agree that it is impracticable for City staff to complete processing, review and presentation of sufficient information to enable legally required findings to be made for project consideration, unless invoices are paid in full. The City and I understand and agree that invoices mailed by the City to the above listed billing address and not returned to the City shall be considered by the City as being received by me. I agree to remit payment within 30 days of presentation of an invoice by the City for such services. I have read, understood, and agree to the Land Use Review Fee Policy including consequences for no-payment. I agree to pay the following initial deposit amounts for the specified hours of staff time. I understand that payment of a deposit does not render and application complete or compliant with approval criteria. If actual recorded costs exceed the initial deposit, I agree to pay additional monthly billings to the City to reimburse the City for the processing of my application at the hourly rates hereinafter stated. $ deposit for hours of Community Development Department staff time. Additional time above the deposit amount will be billed at $325.00 per hour. $ deposit for hours of Engineering Department staff time. Additional time above the deposit amount will be billed at $325.00 per hour. City of Aspen: Property Owner: Phillip Supino, AICP Community Development Director Name: Title: POWDERDAYSKIING LLC David Tarrab, Managing Member 312 W. Hyman Avenue Aspen, CO david.tarrab@grupottt.net PO Box 10261 Aspen, CO 81612 1,950.00 6 David Tarrab Managing Member, POWDERDAYSKIING LLC 102 Pitkin County Mailing List of 300 Feet Radius Pitkin County GIS presents the information and data on this web site as a service to the public. Every effort has been made to ensure that the information and data contained in this electronic system is accurate, but the accuracy may change. The information maintained by the County may not be complete as to mineral estate ownership and that information should be determined by separate legal and property analysis. Pitkin County GIS makes no warranty or guarantee concerning the completeness, accuracy, or reliability of the content at this site or at other sites to which we link. Assessing accuracy and reliability of information and data is the sole responsibility of the user. The user understands he or she is solely responsible and liable for use, modification, or distribution of any information or data obtained on this web site. This document contains a Mailing List formatted to be printed on Avery 5160 Labels. If printing, DO NOT "fit to page" or "shrink oversized pages." This will manipulate the margins such that they no longer line up on the labels sheet. Print actual size. From Parcel: 273512464006 on 06/10/2022 Instructions: Disclaimer: http://www.pitkinmapsandmore.com Attachment 13 103 220 WEST COOPER LLC ASPEN, CO 81611 625 E HYMAN AVE #201 235 W HOPKINS B LLC BOCA RATON, FL 33432 250 S OCEAN BLVD # 14A 400 W HOPKINS CONDO LLC DALLAS, TX 75209 5403 NEOLA DR AJAX APARTMENTS CONDO ASSOC ASPEN, CO 81611 COMMON AREA 301 W HYMAN AVE AJOY ASPEN LLC AVENTURA, FL 33180 18851 NE 29TH AVE #405 ALLAN ANDREW S DENVER, CO 80218 154 MARION ST ANCALA SHADOWVIEW RETREAT LLC DUBLIN, OH 43017 10277 MACKENZIE WY ASPEN A CONDO ASSOC ASPEN, CO 81611 COMMON AREA 308 W HOPKINS AVE ASPEN HIDEAWAYS LLC STUART, FL 34994 49 SW FLAGGER AVE #201 BDDC TRUST DALLAS, TX 75201 2100 ROSS AVE #550 BEHRENDT H MICHAEL TRUST ASPEN, CO 81611 334 W HYMAN AVE BRAFMAN FAMILY TRUST ASPEN, CO 81611 334 W HOPKINS BRAFMAN STUART REV TRUST CHEVY CHASE, MD 20815 5630 WISCONSIN AVE #401 BRAHMAN MARITAL TRUST ASPEN, CO 81611 334 W HOPKINS BROMLEY WENDI TRUST HONOLULU, HI 96815-4627 2969 KALAKAUA AVE #1201 CHARY REV TRUST LAS VEGAS, NV 89135 39 PANORAMA CREST AVE CHERNY ANDREA J ASPEN, CO 81611 301 WEST HYMAN AVE #5 CITY OF ASPEN ASPEN, CO 81611 427 RIO GRANDE PL CONNOR WILLIAM E II TRUST RENO, NV 89502 990 S ROCK BLVD #F CORBETT RICHARD J & JILLIAN F ASPEN, CO 81612 PO BOX 7955 DHM FAMILY TRST ATLANTA, GA 30309 2288 PEACHTREE RD, NW #12 EDGEWATER PROPERTIES LLC OMAHA, NE 68022 18081 BURT ST EGBERT STEPHEN E ASPEN, CO 81611 301 W HYMAN AVE #1 FCB LLC SNOWMASS, CO 816549102 525 SHIELD O RD FINIGAN SC REAL ESTATE LLC BONITA SPRINGS, FL 34134 4851 BONITA BAY BLVD #2002 FOSTER LOT 2 LLC ASPEN, CO 81611 625 E HYMAN AVE #201 FRANKEL KATHY TRUST NAPLES, FL 34102 280 GULF SHORE BLVD N GARET CONDO ASSOC ASPEN, CO 81611 400 E MAIN ST #2 GILDENHORN MICHAEL S BETHESDA, MD 20816 5008 BALTON RD GOSS CHESTER A IV ASPEN, CO 81612 PO BOX 9642 104 GROVER FREDRICK W & PAULA J ST PETERSBURG, FL 337043717 725 BRIGHTWATERG BLVD NE GUNN ROBERT W FAMILY TRST MARBLEHEAD, MA 01945 409 OCEAN AVE HAERTER JONATHAN J & BETHANY S SNOWMASS VILLAGE, CO 81615 PO BOX 6447 HOLTZMAN L BART & PATRICIA G RANCHO MIRAGE, CA 92270 2 SURREY CT JLR QPRT TRUST CORAL GABLES, FL 33156 355 MARQUESA DR JOBLON MATTHEW ENGLEWOOD, CO 80013 43 COVINGTON CT JOHNSTON FAMILY TRUST COSTA MESA, CA 92626 2018 PHALAROPE KASPAR THERESA D ASPEN, CO 81612 PO BOX 1637 KENDIG ROBERT & SUE ASPEN, CO 81612 PO BOX 4649 KOSTER RYAN & SUANNE ASPEN, CO 81611 400 W HOPKINS AVE #5 LITTLE CLOUD HOMEOWNERS ASSOC ASPEN, CO 81611 201 N MILL ST MARTEN RANDOLPH MONDOVI, WI 54755 129 MARTEN ST MARTIN SCOTT M ASPEN, CO 81611 PO BOX 51 MCCARTY DANIEL L ASPEN, CO 81612 PO BOX 4051 MILLER BRITT C ASPEN, CO 816111625 301 W HYMAN AVE APT 4 MORGAN DONALD ATLANTA, GA 30309 2288 PEACHTREE RD, NW #12 MULLINS MARGARET ANN ASPEN, CO 81611 216 W HYMAN AVE NANOOK RIDGE LLC ASPEN, CO 81611 324 W HOPKINS AVE #B NEVINS NATHALIE R ASPEN, CO 81611 127 NICHOLAS LN NORTON CAPITAL PARTNERS LLLP ASPEN, CO 81611 335 S SECOND ST PAN ABODE CONDO ASSOC ASPEN, CO 81611 211 W HOPKINS AVE PITKIN COUNTY ASPEN, CO 81611 530 E MAIN ST #301 RAINBOW CONNECTION PROPERTIES LLC MORRISON, CO 80465 151 SUMMER ST #771 RESSEL THOMAS G ASPEN, CO 816111625 301 W HYMAN AVE #7 REYNOLDS FRANK R IV ASPEN, CO 81612 PO BOX 2725 SAND KATHERINE M ASPEN, CO 81612 PO BOX 51 SCOTT BUILDING CONDO ASSOC ASPEN, CO 81611 400 W HOPKINS AVE SHADOW MOUNTAIN DUPLEX CONDO ASSOC ASPEN, CO 81611 COMMON AREA W HOPKINS AVE SHADOW MOUNTAIN LODGE CONDO ASSOC ASPEN, CO 81611 COMMON AREA W HOPKINS AVE SHADOW MTN HOMEOWNER ASSOC ASPEN, CO 81611 232 W HYMAN AVE 105 SHADOWVIEW CONDO ASSOC ASPEN, CO 81611 320 W HOPKINS AVE SHERWIN ENTERPRISES LLC DURHAM, NC 27701 1714 VISTA ST SWISS CHALET/KITZBUHEL PARTNERSHIP ASPEN, CO 81611 333 E DURANT AVE TRAN LAN D ASPEN, CO 81612 PO BOX 2705 UNDERWOOD AMOS ASPEN, CO 81611 301 W HYMAN #6 UTOPIA LIVING ASPEN LLC SANTA MONICA, CA 90402 225 GEORGINA AVE VALLEY EXCHANGE PROPERTIES LLC ASPEN, CO 81611 122 W MAIN ST WEST ASPEN MOUNTAIN CONDO ASSOC ASPEN, CO 81611 333 S SECOND ST WEST SIDE CONDO ASSOC ASPEN, CO 81611 234 W HOPKINS AVE WINER CAROL G BETHESDA , MD 20817 6740 SELKIRK DR 106 SHEET TITLE INTEGRATED DESIGN TEAM PROJECT NO: MODEL FILE: DRAWN BY: COPYRIGHT: SHEET 1 A001 Jeffrey H Woodruff 312_W_Hyman_04272022.pln Project No. 116 /Users/jeffreyw/Documents/Cloud Hill Design/312 W Hyman/312_W_Hyman_04272022.plnPowder Day Skiiing, LLC, David A Tarrab Mees Cover Sheet 312 W Hyman Ave 312 W Hyman Ave Lots P+Q, Block 46 Aspen CO 81611 USA/ Pitkin County UGB, City of Aspen 312 W Hyman Ave Aspen CO 81611 USA Account # R000145 Parcel ID # 273512464006 Landscape Architect Jennifer M. Dolecki-Smith, RLA Escape Garden Design, LLC Interior Design Travis Terry Travis Terry Design Contractor (At Final) Structural Engineer (As per contractor) Civil Grading and Drainage Boundaries Unlimited (Preliminary) COA- HPO Site Visit08/22/21 Jeffrey H. Woodruff AIA, LEED AP Cloud Hill Design, LLC Snowmass Snowmass CO 81654 USA COA- HPC Conceptual02/26/22 COA- HPC Conceptual04/27/22 SHEET INDEX A001 V1 V2 C1 L100 Z001 Z002 Z003 Z004 Z005 Z006 Z008 A101 A102 A103 A104 A105 A106 A107 A108 A200 A201 A203 A204 A210 A211 A300 A301 A500 A501 A600 A700 A900 A901 A903 Cover Sheet Improvement Survey Topographic Survey Plat Civil Site Grading and Drainage Landscape Architecture Floor Area Calculations Floor Area Calculations Height Measurements Wall Demolition Calculations Site Coverage Zoning Summary Forestry Site Coverage Architectural Site Plan Architectural Site Drainage Plan Main Level Proposed Plan Second Level Proposed Plan Roof Plan Proposed Main Level Existing Plan Second Level Existing Plan Roof Plan Existing Elevations Proposed Elevations Proposed Existing Elevations Existing Elevations Fence Layout Garage Elevations Transverse Sections Longitudinal Sections Schedules Schedules Assemblies HP HPO Materials Precedent Studies Restudy Required HPC 1.0 Relationship to Neighborhood 312 W H y m a n A.F.F. ADJ. ALT. A.B. & ARCH. @ BM. BM. PKT. BRG. BLK'G. BOT. B.F. BLDG. B.O. CAB. CLG. CL. C.T. CLR. COL. CONC. CONN. CONT. DTL. DBL. DWL. E.W. ELEV. OR EL. EXIST'G EXT. F.F. F.D. FLR. FTG. FND. GA. G.L. G.W.B. G.S. HB. HT. HK. HORIZ. HYD. ABOVE FINISH FLOOR ADJUSTABLE ALTERNATE ANCHOR BOLTS AND ARCHITECTURAL AT BEAM BEAM POCKET BEARING BLOCKING BOTTOM BOTTOM OF FOOTING BUILDING BY OWNER CABINET CEILING CENTER LINE CERAMIC TILE CLEAR COLUMN CONCRETE CONNECTION CONTINUOUS DETAIL DOUBLE DOWEL EACH WAY ELEVATION EXISTING EXTERIOR FINISHED FLOOR FLOOR DRAIN FLOOR FOOTING FOUNDATION GAUGE GLU-LAM GYPSUM WALL BOARD GAS STUB HOSE BIB HEIGHT HOOK HORIZONTAL HYDRANT INFO. INSUL. JST. L.L. LONGINT. N.I.C. O.C. OPP. O/ PTD. PERF. PL. PLY. PROP. LINE REINF. RDWD. REQ'D. RESIL. REV. S.M. SIM. S.F. OR SQ. FT. STD. STL. STDS. THK. TLT. T.F. T.P. T.L. T.W. TOT. T.B. TRANSV. TYP. U.N.O. V.I.F. VERT. V.W.C. W.C. W.H. W.P. W.R. WIN. W/ WD. INFORMATION INSULATION JOIST LIVE LOAD LONGITUDINAL NOT IN CONTRACT ON CENTER OPPOSITE OVER PAINTED PERFORATED PLATE PLYWOOD PROPERTY LINE REINFORCEMENT REDWOOD REQUIRED RESILIENT REVISED SHEET METAL SIMILAR SQUARE FEET STANDARD STEEL STUDS THICK TOILET TOP OF FOOTING TOP OF PLATE TOP OF LEDGE TOP OF WALL TOTAL TOWEL BAR TRANSVERSE TYPICAL UNLESS NOTED OTHERWISE VERIFY IN FIELD VERTICAL VINYL WALL COVERING WATER CLOSET WATER HEATER WATERPROOF WATER RESISTANT WINDOW WITH WOOD 312 W Hyman Ave Powder Day Skiiing, LLC, David A Tarrab Mees 312 W Hyman Ave Lots P+Q, Block 46 Aspen CO 81611 USA/Pitkin County UGB, City of Aspen PROJECT: Renovation, Energy Upgrades and Historic Preservation ADDRESS: 312 W Hyman Ave, Aspen, CO 81611 COUNTY: Pitkin County PARCEL NUMBER: 73512464006 PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Interior Renovation and Energy Upgrades, IECC Compliance ZONING: R6 Medium Density Residential CONSTRUCTION TYPE: VB OCCUPANCY GROUP: RESIDENTIAL FIRE PROTECTION: Non-sprinklered NUMBER OF STORIES: TWO ELEVATION 100= 7901.36' SITE 5976+- S.F. 1. CONTRACTOR TO COMPLY WITH CODES, LAWS, ORDINANCES, RULES, AND REGULATIONS OF PUBLIC AUTHORITIES GOVERNING THE WORK. 2. CONTRACTOR TO REVIEW DOCUMENTS, VERIFY DIMENSIONS AND FIELD CONDITIONS AND CONFIRM THAT WORK IS BUILDABLE AS SHOWN. CONTRACTOR TO REPORT ANY CONFLICTS OR OMISSIONS TO THE ARCHITECT FOR CLARIFICATION PRIOR TO PERFORMING ANY WORK IN QUESTION. 3. FOR SUBSTITUTIONS, REFER TO THE SPECIFICATIONS. 4. DO NOT SCALE DRAWINGS. DIMENSIONS SHALL TAKE PRECEDENCE OVER SCALES SHOWN ON DRAWINGS, GENERAL CONTRACTOR SHALL VERIFY ALL DIMENSIONS, GRADES AND CONDITIONS AT SITE PRIOR TO COMMENCING THE WORK. 5. MAINTAIN DIMENSIONS MARKED 'CLEAR'. ALLOW FOR THICKNESS OF FINISHES. 6. CEILING HEIGHT DIMENSIONS ARE TO FINISHED SURFACES. 7. CONTRACTOR TO COORDINATE AND PROVIDE BACKING FOR MILLWORK AND ITEMS ATTACHED OR MOUNTED TO WALLS OR CEILINGS. 8. EXCEPT WHERE SHOWN IN DIMENSIONAL DETAIL, THE LOCATIONS OF PLUMBING, MECHANICAL EQUIPMENT, DUCTS, PIPING AND FITTINGS ARE ONLY APPROXIMATE. THE EXACT LOCATIONS SHALL BE DETERMINED BY THE CONTRACTOR, SUBJECT TO APPROVAL BY THE ARCHITECT. 9. CONTRACTOR SHALL PROVIDE AND INSTALL ALL STIFFENERS, BRACING, BLOCKING, AND SUPPORTING BRACKETS REQUIRED FOR THE INSTALLATION OF ALL CASEWORK, TOILET ROOM ACCESSORIES, FIXTURES AND PARTITIONS AND ALL WALL MOUNTED OR SUSPENDED MECHANICAL, ELECTRICAL OR MISCELLANEOUS EQUIPMENT AND FURNISHINGS. 10. ALL WORK PERFORMED SHALL COMPLY WITH THE CONTRACT DOCUMENTS, DRAWINGS, SPECIFICATIONS, AND GEOTECHNICAL INVESTIGATION AND PAVEMENT RECOMMENDATIONS. 11. SPECIFICATIONS, BOUND SEPARATELY, ARE PART OF THE CONTRACT DOCUMENTS. 12. ALL MATERIALS AND WORKMANSHIP SHALL CONFORM TO THE DRAWINGS AND SPECIFICATIONS. IF CONFLICT IS FOUND BETWEEN DRAWINGS, GENERAL NOTES AND SPECIFICATIONS, CONSULT THE ARCHITECT BEFORE PROCEEDING WITH THE WORK. 13. THE STRUCTURAL, MECHANICAL AND ELECTRICAL DRAWINGS ARE SUPPLEMENTARY TO THE ARCHITECTURAL DRAWINGS. IT SHALL BE THE RESPONSIBILITY OF THE CONTRACTOR TO CHECK WITH THE ARCHITECTURAL DRAWINGS BEFORE THE INSTALLATION OF STRUCTURAL, MECHANICAL AND ELECTRICAL WORK. SHOULD THERE BE A DISCREPANCY BETWEEN THE ARCHITECTURAL DRAWINGS AND THE CONSULTING ENGINEERS' DRAWINGS THAT WOULD CAUSE AN AWKWARD INSTALLATION, IT SHALL BE BROUGHT TO THE ARCHITECT'S AND ENGINEERS' ATTENTION FOR CLARIFICATION PRIOR TO THE INSTALLATION OF SAID WORK. 14. GENERAL NOTES ARE NOT A SUBSTITUTE NOR A REPLACEMENT FOR THE PROJECT SPECIFICATIONS. THESE NOTES ARE INTENDED AS A GUIDE TO THE DESIGN AND/OR CONSTRUCTION REQUIREMENTS ESTABLISHED FOR THIS PROJECT. 15. NO CONTRACTOR SHOULD ATTEMPT TO BID OR CONSTRUCT ANY PORTION OF THE WORK WITHOUT CONSULTING THE PROJECT SPECIFICATIONS. 16. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL COORDINATE THE INTENT OF THE GENERAL NOTES WITH ALL TRADES Snow-load: TBC PSF, Up to 8000' Elevation, Elevation is 7901.36' 100' as per Civil = 7901.36' Roof Duration = 1.0 Seismic Design Category = B or C, as per Figure R301.2 (2) As per soil design category Weathering probability for Concrete = Severe Termite Infestation Probability = None to slight Wind Speed = 115 mph (ultimate design) Wind Exposure = B or C, Section R301.2.1.4 Frost Depth = 36", TBC (up to 8000' Elevation) Air Freezing Index = TBC° F Days – Up to 8000 ft. elevation Ice Barrier Underlayment = Required Mean Annual Temp = variable Insulation = as per Minimum R-Values per 2009 IECC, Table 402.1.1, Client chooses to utilize stricter minimums as per 2018 IECC for thermal comfort and energy efficiency. As per State House Bill 09-1091, CO alarms are required within 15 feet of all sleeping rooms BUILDING Pitkin County Currently Adopted Codes. The client will conform with 2018 IECC (Assemblies and Fenestration) and the updated land use code for Energy Efficiency on Earth Day 2020. 2015 International Building Code 2015 International Residential Code 2015 International Mechanical Code 2015 International Plumbing Code 2015 International Fuel & Gas Code 2015 International Energy Conservation Code Pitkin County Efficient Building Code Most Current National Electrical Code Project summary and aims, as per Land Use Code: The historic building and the site remains key elements of the property and the new development does not compromise the visual integrity of the historic property; and The new construction is reflective of the proportional patterns found in the historic building's forms, materials and openings, or the work removes later alterations and restores the historic building to its appearance during its period of significance; and The project is compatible with the character of the neighborhood in which it is located; and Historic outbuildings site and landscape features are retained and stabilized and restored, as appropriate. 107 SHEET TITLE INTEGRATED DESIGN TEAM PROJECT NO: MODEL FILE: DRAWN BY: COPYRIGHT: SHEET 2 V1 Jeffrey H Woodruff 312_W_Hyman_04272022.pln Project No. 116 /Users/jeffreyw/Documents/Cloud Hill Design/312 W Hyman/312_W_Hyman_04272022.plnPowder Day Skiiing, LLC, David A Tarrab Mees Improvement Survey 312 W Hyman Ave 312 W Hyman Ave Lots P+Q, Block 46 Aspen CO 81611 USA/ Pitkin County UGB, City of Aspen 312 W Hyman Ave Aspen CO 81611 USA Account # R000145 Parcel ID # 273512464006 Landscape Architect Jennifer M. Dolecki-Smith, RLA Escape Garden Design, LLC Interior Design Travis Terry Travis Terry Design Contractor (At Final) Structural Engineer (As per contractor) Civil Grading and Drainage Boundaries Unlimited (Preliminary) COA- HPO Site Visit08/22/21 Jeffrey H. Woodruff AIA, LEED AP Cloud Hill Design, LLC Snowmass Snowmass CO 81654 USA COA- HPC Conceptual02/26/22 COA- HPC Conceptual04/27/22 (S75°1 1 ' 0 9 " E 6 0 . 0 0 ' ) S75°14 ' 5 8 " E 5 8 . 5 9 ' E E E G (N14°50'49"E 100.00')N15°05'12"E 99.90' S14°50'49"W 100.00'N75°09 ' 1 1 " W 6 0 . 0 0 ' BASIS O F B E A R I N G S FOUND NO. 5 REBAR FOUND NO. 5 REBAR FOUND NO. 5 REBAR SET FOUND NO. 5 REBAR & 1-1/4" ORANGE PLASTIC CAP PROP CORNER TNC PLS38215 (20.90' W I D E ) GRAVE L A L L E Y ALLEY - B L O C K 4 6 LOT P LOT Q LOT O LOT N LOT R LOT S W. HY M A N A V E N U E (74.80' W I D E P U B L I C ) SE CORNER BLOCK 46 FOUND REBAR & 1-1/2" ALUMINUM CAP (NO STAMPING) N75°09 ' 1 1 " W 5 9 . 9 2 ' (60.00' ) 33.4' 4.0' 4.9' 8.3' 5.5' 11.5' 0.7' 0.7'2.2'0.8' 0.7' 0.7'0.8'2.2'9.2'0.8'0.8'38.4'21.2'7.2'11.1' ( T I E )19.8'(TIE)0.8' 2.4' (TIE)13.4'5.5' APPARENT ENCROACHMENT DRIVEWAY & WOOD RETAINING GRAVEL DRIVEWAYWOOD RETAININGWOOD RETAININGAPPARENT ENCROACHMENT R.R.TIE WALL CONCRETE APRO N UPPER DECK STEPS FLAGSTONE PATIO SIDEWALK2 - STORY FRAME HOUSE 312 WEST HYMAN AVENUE 5976± SQ.FT.NEIGHBORING RESIDENCECONCR E T E C U R B & G U T T E R PAVED R O A D W A Y MAILB O X 4.4' APPARENT ENCROACHMENT WOOD RETAINING ELECTRIC PEDESTAL CATV PEDESTAL TELEPHONE PEDESTAL GAS METER ELECTRICAL METER G LEGEND E SURVEYOR'S CERTIFICATION SURVEY NOTES: LOTS P & Q - BLOCK 46, CITY AND TOWNSITE OF ASPEN SECTION 12, TOWNSHIP 10 SOUTH, RANGE 85 WEST OF THE 6TH PM COUNTY OF PITKIN, STATE OF COLORADO IMPROVEMENT SURVEY PLAT TRUE NORTH COLORADO LLC. A LAND SURVEYING AND MAPPING COMPANY PO BOX 614 - 529 S. WILD HORSE DRIVE NEW CASTLE, COLORADO 81647 (970) 984-0474 www.truenorthcolorado.com PROJECT NO: 2019-104 DATE: JANUARY 18, 2019 DRAWN RPK SURVEYED LDV SHEET 1 OF 1 TRUENORTH A LAND SURVEYING AND MAPPING COMPANY 8'4'16' SCALE: 1" = 8' N PROPERTY DESCRIPTION:0 SCHEDULE B PART II TITLE EXCEPTIONS: 108 SHEET TITLE INTEGRATED DESIGN TEAM PROJECT NO: MODEL FILE: DRAWN BY: COPYRIGHT: SHEET 3 V2 Jeffrey H Woodruff 312_W_Hyman_04272022.pln Project No. 116 /Users/jeffreyw/Documents/Cloud Hill Design/312 W Hyman/312_W_Hyman_04272022.plnPowder Day Skiiing, LLC, David A Tarrab Mees Topographic Survey Plat 312 W Hyman Ave 312 W Hyman Ave Lots P+Q, Block 46 Aspen CO 81611 USA/ Pitkin County UGB, City of Aspen 312 W Hyman Ave Aspen CO 81611 USA Account # R000145 Parcel ID # 273512464006 Landscape Architect Jennifer M. Dolecki-Smith, RLA Escape Garden Design, LLC Interior Design Travis Terry Travis Terry Design Contractor (At Final) Structural Engineer (As per contractor) Civil Grading and Drainage Boundaries Unlimited (Preliminary) COA- HPO Site Visit08/22/21 Jeffrey H. Woodruff AIA, LEED AP Cloud Hill Design, LLC Snowmass Snowmass CO 81654 USA COA- HPC Conceptual02/26/22 COA- HPC Conceptual04/27/22 L M K F G H I B C D E (S7 5 ° 1 1 ' 0 9 " E 6 0 . 0 0 ' ) S7 5 ° 1 4 ' 5 8 " E 5 8 . 5 9 ' E EG (N14°50'49"E 100.00') N15°05'12"E99.90' S14°50'49"W 100.00'N75 ° 0 9 ' 1 1 " W 6 0 . 0 0 ' BA S I S O F B E A R I N G S FOUND N O . 5 R E B A R FOUND N O . 5 R E B A R FOUND N O . 5 R E B A R SITE BEN C H M A R K SET FOU N D N O . 5 R E B A R & 1-1/4" OR A N G E P L A S T I C C A P PROP CO R N E R T N C P L S 3 8 2 1 5 ELEVATI O N : 7 9 0 0 . 8 4 (20. 9 0 ' W I D E ) GR A V E L A L L E Y ALL E Y BL O C K 4 6 LO T P LO T Q LO T O LO T N LO T R LO T S W. H Y M A N A V E N U E (74. 8 0 ' W I D E P U B L I C ) SE CORN E R BLOCK 4 6 FOUND R E B A R & 1 - 1 / 2 " ALUMINU M C A P (NO STA M P I N G ) N75 ° 0 9 ' 1 1 " W 5 9 . 9 2 ' (60. 0 0 ' ) 33.4' 4.0' 4.9' 8.3' 5.5'11.5'0.7' 0.7'2.2'0.8' 0.7' 0.7'0.8'2.2'9.2'0.8'0.8'38.4'21.2'7.2'11. 1 ' ( T I E )19.8'(TIE)0.8'2.4' (TIE )13.4'5.5' APPAREN TENCROA C H M E N TDRIVEWA Y & WOOD R E T A I N I N G GRAVEL DRIVEWA YWOOD RETAININGWOOD RETAININGAPPAREN T ENCROA C H M E N T R.R. TIE WALL CONCRETE APRON UPPER DECK STEPS FLAGSTO N E PATIO SIDEWALK2 - STOR Y FRAME H O U S E & GARAGE312 WES T H Y M A N A V E N U E 0.137± A C R E S5976± SQ . F T .NEIGHBORING RESIDENCECO N C R E T E C U R B & G U T T E R PAV E D R O A D W A Y MAI L B O X 4.4' APPAREN T ENCROA C H M E N T WOOD R E T A I N I N G OS WN6 7 ° 5 3 ' 3 3 " W 1 2 3 7 . 0 4 ' ( T I E ) CITY OF A S P E N GPS MO N U M E N T # 7 CITY OF A S P E N GPS MO N U M E N T # 6 ELEVATI O N : 7 8 9 3 . 6 1 S86°19' 5 1 " E 8 1 8 . 1 0 ' ( T I E ) 1 2 3 4 5 678 9 10 11 121314 15 16 GARAGE 7901.31 FFE 7901.36 FFE 7901.33 SOUTH 2nd STREET(74.62' WIDE PUBLIC)79047903 790279017901 7901 790179 0 2 7902 79037 9 0 3 7 9 0 4 10' R E A R S E T B A C K - P R I N C I P A L B U I L D I N G 5' R E A R S E T B A C K - P R I N C I P A L B U I L D I N G U S E D A S G A R A G E & A C C E S S O R Y B U I L D I N G 5' MINIMUM SIDE SETBACK5' MINIMUM SIDE SETBACK10' F R O N T S E T B A C K PRI N C I P A L B U I L D I N G 15' F R O N T S E T B A C K AC C E S S O R Y B U I L D I N G ELECTRIC PEDESTAL CATV PEDESTAL OSW WATER SHUTOFF WATER LINE SEWER LINE TELEPHONE LINE GAS LINE CATV LINE UNDERGROUND ELECTRIC LINE TELEPHONE PEDESTAL GAS METER ELECTRICAL METER G LEGEND E SURVEYOR'S CERTIFICATION I, RODNEY P. KISER, HEREBY CERTIFY TO HENRY LAMBERT & CAREY BOND THAT THIS IS AN "IMPROVEMENT SURVEY PLAT" AS DEFINED BY C.R.S.38-51-102(9) AND THAT IT IS A MONUMENTED LAND SURVEY PERFORMED UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION AND RESPONSIBLE CHARGE SHOWING THE LOCATION OF ALL STRUCTURES, VISIBLE UTILITIES, FENCES, HEDGES, OR WALLS SITUATED ON THE DESCRIBED PARCEL AND WITHIN FIVE FEET OF ALL BOUNDARIES OF SUCH PARCEL, ANY CONFLICTING BOUNDARY EVIDENCE OR VISIBLE ENCROACHMENTS, AND ALL EASEMENTS, UNDERGROUND UTILITIES, AND TUNNELS DESCRIBED IN THE ATTORNEYS TITLE INSURANCE AGENCY OF ASPEN, LLC COMMITMENT FOR TITLE INSURANCE COMMITMENT NO. 18003943, OR OTHER SOURCES AS SPECIFIED ON THE IMPROVEMENT SURVEY PLAT. LINEAR ERROR OF CLOSURE IS LEES THAN 1:15,000. RODNEY P. KISER LICENSED PROFESSIONAL LAND SURVEYOR COLORADO REGISTRATION NO. 38215 SURVEY NOTES: 1. BASIS OF BEARINGS FOR THIS SURVEY IS A BEARING OF N75°09'11"W BETWEEN A FOUND NO. 5 REBARS AS SHOWN HEREON. 2. DATE OF FIELD SURVEY: JANUARY 15, 2019 AND JANUARY 25, 2019. AT THE TIME OF THE FIELD SURVEY THERE WAS 4"+ OF SNOW ON THE GROUND. 3. LINEAR UNITS USED TO PERFORM THIS SURVEY WERE U.S. SURVEY FEET. 4. THIS SURVEY IS BASED ON THE OFFICIAL MAP OF THE CITY OF ASPEN DATED DECEMBER 18, 1959 AS RECEPTION NO. 109043, THE PLAT OF RESUBDIVIDED LOTS K, L, M, N, O, BLOCK 46 RECORDED JANUARY 15, 1982 IN PLAT BOOK 12 AT PAGE 54 AND CORNERS FOUND IN PLACE AS SHOWN HEREON. 5. THIS IMPROVEMENT SURVEY PLAT DOES NOT CONSTITUTE A TITLE SEARCH BY TRUE NORTH COLORADO, LLC, FOR ALL INFORMATION REGARDING EASEMENT, RIGHTS-OF-WAY AND/OR TITLE OF RECORD, TRUE NORTH COLORADO, LLC. RELIED UPON TITLE COMMITMENT NO. 18003943 ISSUED BY ATTORNEYS TITLE INSURANCE AGENCY OF ASPEN, LLC, EFFECTIVE DATE: JANUARY 22, 2019. 6. BEARINGS AND DISTANCES SHOWN HEREON ARE BASED ON FIELD MEASUREMENTS. BEARINGS AND DISTANCES SHOWN IN PARENTHESIS ARE OF RECORD SHOWN ON THE OFFICIAL MAP OF THE CITY OF ASPEN DATED NOVEMBER 16, 1959. 7. THE SUBJECT PROPERTY LIES WITHIN FLOOD ZONE X WHICH ARE AREAS DETERMINED TO BE OUTSIDE THE 500-YEAR FLOOD PLAIN) ACCORDING TO FEMA FLOOD INSURANCE RATE MAP COMMUNITY PANEL NO. 08097C0203C WITH AN EFFECTIVE DATE OF JUNE 4, 1987. 8. THERE ARE NO NATURAL HAZARDS THAT EXIST ON THE SUBJECT PROPERTY. 9. NATURAL SLOPES ARE BETWEEN 0% TO 15% OVER THE ENTIRE SITE. 10. BASED ON 1958 CITY OF ASPEN TOPOGRAPHY THE SUBJECT PROPERTY DOES NOT APPEAR TO BE MANIPULATED FROM HISTORIC GRADE. LOTS P & Q - BLOCK 46, CITY AND TOWNSITE OF ASPEN SECTION 12, TOWNSHIP 10 SOUTH, RANGE 85 WEST OF THE 6TH PM COUNTY OF PITKIN, STATE OF COLORADO IMPROVEMENT & TOPOGRAPHICSURVEY PLAT YEARS FROM THE DATE OF CERTIFICATION SHOWN HEREON. AFTER YOU FIRST DISCOVER SUCH DEFECT. IN NO EVENT MAY ANY ACTION ACTION BASED UPON ANY DEFECT IN THIS SURVEY WITHIN THREE YEARS BASED UPON ANY DEFECT IN THIS SURVEY BE COMMENCED MORE THAN TEN NOTICE: ACCORDING TO COLORADO LAW YOU MUST COMMENCE ANY LEGAL TRUE NORTH COLORADO LLC. A LAND SURVEYING AND MAPPING COMPANY PO BOX 614 - 529 S. WILD HORSE DRIVE NEW CASTLE, COLORADO 81647 (970) 984-0474 www.truenorthcolorado.com PROJECT NO: 2019-115 DATE: FEBRUARY 1, 2019 RPK LDV 1 OF 1 TRUE NORTH COLORADO A LAND SURVEYING AND MAPPING COMPANY HENRY LAMBERT & CAREY BOND IMPROVEMENT & TOPOGRAPHIC SURVEY PLAT LOTS P & Q - BLOCK 46 CITY OF ASPEN COUNTY OF PITKIN - STATE OF COLORADO 8'4'16' SCALE: 1" = 8' N 0 TREE TYPE SIZE DRIP TREE CHART 1 2 30"40' 16"32' CONIFEROUS CONIFEROUS 3 22"32'CONIFEROUS 4 20"30' 5 6 6"12' 7 8" 8 16'9 10 40"40'CONIFEROUS11 12 ASPEN 13 ASPEN 14 ASPEN 15 ASPEN 16 16"32'ASPEN CONIFEROUS 24"30'CONIFEROUS ASPEN ASPEN ASPEN 16' 16' 8" 8"ASPEN 16"32'ASPEN 8"16' 6"12' 8"16' 8"16' ZONING: CITY OF ASPEN LAND USE CODE: R-6 SETBACKS FRONT YARD: PRINCIPAL BUILDINGS: 10 FEET ACCESSORY BUILDINGS: 15 FEET REAR YARD: PRINCIPAL BUILDINGS: 10 FEET PRINCIPAL BUILDING USED SOLELY AS GARAGE: 5 FEET ACCESSORY BUILDINGS: 5 FEET SIDE YARD: MINIMUM: 5 FEET 10 FEET, PLUS 1 FOOT FOR EACH ADDITIONAL 300 SQUARE FEET OF GROSS LOT AREA, TO A MAXIMUM OF 15 FEET OF TOTAL SIDE YARD 109 SHEET TITLE INTEGRATED DESIGN TEAM PROJECT NO: MODEL FILE: DRAWN BY: COPYRIGHT: SHEET 4 C1 Jeffrey H Woodruff 312_W_Hyman_04272022.pln Project No. 116 /Users/jeffreyw/Documents/Cloud Hill Design/312 W Hyman/312_W_Hyman_04272022.plnPowder Day Skiiing, LLC, David A Tarrab Mees Civil Site Grading and Drainage 312 W Hyman Ave 312 W Hyman Ave Lots P+Q, Block 46 Aspen CO 81611 USA/ Pitkin County UGB, City of Aspen 312 W Hyman Ave Aspen CO 81611 USA Account # R000145 Parcel ID # 273512464006 Landscape Architect Jennifer M. Dolecki-Smith, RLA Escape Garden Design, LLC Interior Design Travis Terry Travis Terry Design Contractor (At Final) Structural Engineer (As per contractor) Civil Grading and Drainage Boundaries Unlimited (Preliminary) COA- HPO Site Visit08/22/21 Jeffrey H. Woodruff AIA, LEED AP Cloud Hill Design, LLC Snowmass Snowmass CO 81654 USA COA- HPC Conceptual02/26/22 COA- HPC Conceptual04/27/22 E E G WSOD2.0%6.5%2.6%1 1 1 FF: 7901.31' FF: 7901.31'FF:7901.33'FF:7901.36'D#3000 7901.31' #3001 7899.35' #3002 7901.36' #3003 7901.37' #3004 7901.08' #3005 7900.88' #3006 7901.17' #3007 7901.15' #3008 7901.18' #3009 7901.13' 1 + 0 0 1+331+001+25Point Table Point # 3000 3001 3002 3003 3004 3005 3006 3007 3008 3009 Raw Description EX. FG EX. FG EX. FG PR. FG PR. FG PR. FG PR. FG EX. FG EX. FG EX. FG Elevation 7901.31' 7899.35' 7901.36' 7901.37' 7901.08' 7900.88' 7901.17' 7901.15' 7901.18' 7901.13' Northing 14948.98 14947.21 14980.65 14986.35 15008.62 15002.86 14981.51 14979.33 14966.89 14951.93 Easting 14907.26 14889.23 14885.17 14887.05 14883.87 14932.86 14927.19 14913.62 14917.42 14922.287904790379027901 7901 79017901 790279037902 7901 7901 7902WQCV/DETENTION DRYWELL SYSTEM RIM: TBD (SEE DETAIL) 12"Ø DOME GRATE 5' OFF BUILDING, TYP. RIM: 6" LOWER THAN FG AT FOUNDATION AND 12"± BELOW FOUNDATION TOP OF WALL 12"Ø SQ.ADA AREADRAIN 12 LF TRENCH DRAIN WITH HEAT TAPERIM: 7901.08' CONNECT TO STORM DRAIN LINE 50 LF 6"Ø SOLID SCH.40 PVC @ 1.0% MIN.WITH HEAT TAPE 80 LF 6"Ø SOLID SCH.40 PVC @ 1.0% MIN.WITH HEAT TAPE SCALE: 1' = 1'-0" 1 Draft Civil Grading and Drainage, NFC C1 Civil Grading and Drainage will be provided at Final Review. This is for placement only, pending conceptual approval. 110 SHEET TITLE INTEGRATED DESIGN TEAM PROJECT NO: MODEL FILE: DRAWN BY: COPYRIGHT: SHEET 5 L100 Jeffrey H Woodruff 312_W_Hyman_04272022.pln Project No. 116 /Users/jeffreyw/Documents/Cloud Hill Design/312 W Hyman/312_W_Hyman_04272022.plnPowder Day Skiiing, LLC, David A Tarrab Mees Landscape Architecture 312 W Hyman Ave 312 W Hyman Ave Lots P+Q, Block 46 Aspen CO 81611 USA/ Pitkin County UGB, City of Aspen 312 W Hyman Ave Aspen CO 81611 USA Account # R000145 Parcel ID # 273512464006 Landscape Architect Jennifer M. Dolecki-Smith, RLA Escape Garden Design, LLC Interior Design Travis Terry Travis Terry Design Contractor (At Final) Structural Engineer (As per contractor) Civil Grading and Drainage Boundaries Unlimited (Preliminary) COA- HPO Site Visit08/22/21 Jeffrey H. Woodruff AIA, LEED AP Cloud Hill Design, LLC Snowmass Snowmass CO 81654 USA COA- HPC Conceptual02/26/22 COA- HPC Conceptual04/27/22 111 SHEET TITLE INTEGRATED DESIGN TEAM PROJECT NO: MODEL FILE: DRAWN BY: COPYRIGHT: SHEET 6 Z001 Jeffrey H Woodruff 312_W_Hyman_04272022.pln Project No. 116 /Users/jeffreyw/Documents/Cloud Hill Design/312 W Hyman/312_W_Hyman_04272022.plnPowder Day Skiiing, LLC, David A Tarrab Mees Floor Area Calculations 312 W Hyman Ave 312 W Hyman Ave Lots P+Q, Block 46 Aspen CO 81611 USA/ Pitkin County UGB, City of Aspen 312 W Hyman Ave Aspen CO 81611 USA Account # R000145 Parcel ID # 273512464006 Landscape Architect Jennifer M. Dolecki-Smith, RLA Escape Garden Design, LLC Interior Design Travis Terry Travis Terry Design Contractor (At Final) Structural Engineer (As per contractor) Civil Grading and Drainage Boundaries Unlimited (Preliminary) COA- HPO Site Visit08/22/21 Jeffrey H. Woodruff AIA, LEED AP Cloud Hill Design, LLC Snowmass Snowmass CO 81654 USA COA- HPC Conceptual02/26/22 COA- HPC Conceptual04/27/22 5,976 sq ft 789 sq ft 41 sq ft 16 sq ft 269 sq ft A A B B C C D D E E 4 4 3 3 2 2 1 1 The Site is 5,976 Square Feet. The built environment is 1,091 Residence (Attached Garage Included in site square footage) 41 Square Feet Storage- East 16 Square Feet Storage- North The existing site coverage is 1,148/5,976 = 19.21%10' R E A R S E T B A C K - P R I N C I P A L B U I L D I N G 5' R E A R S E T B A C K - P R I N C I P A L B U I L D I N G U S E D A S G A R A G E & A C C E S S O R Y B U I L D I N G 5' MINIMUM SIDE SETBACK5' MINIMUM SIDE SETBACK10' F R O N T S E T B A C K PRI N C I P A L B U I L D I N G 15' F R O N T S E T B A C K ACC E S S O R Y B U I L D I N G 10' R E A R S E T B A C K - P R I N C I P A L B U I L D I N G 5' R E A R S E T B A C K - P R I N C I P A L B U I L D I N G U S E D A S G A R A G E & A C C E S S O R Y B U I L D I N G 880 sq ft A A B B C C D D E E 4 4 3 3 2 2 1 1 301 sq ft 60 sq ft Floor Area Calculations City of Aspen 312 W Hyman Zoning Submission Existing Main Level Floor Area Calculations Main Level Gross Floor Area (Sq Ft)824 Garage is 269 Sq Ft, attached Main Level Countable Floor Area (Sq Ft)1,091 Existing Deck/Porch Floor Area Calculations 301 Exempt per 26.575.020.D5, Structural Stairs 60 Sq Ft Front Porch Gross Floor Area (Sq Ft)301 Exempt per 15% of allowable, 15% of 3,240 = 486 Deck/Porch Countable Floor Area (Sq Ft)0 Total Existing Floor Area Calculations Sub-grade Floor Area (Sq Ft)0 Lower Level Floor Area (Sq Ft)880 Main Level Floor Area (Sq Ft)789 Subtracted Stairs at upper level Deck/Porch Floor Area (Sq Ft)0 Total Existing Floor Area (Sq Ft 1,669 1 N SCALE: 1/8" = 1'-0" 2 Existing Main Level Floor Area Z001 SCALE: 1/8" = 1'-0" 3 Existing Second Level Floor Area Z001 112 SHEET TITLE INTEGRATED DESIGN TEAM PROJECT NO: MODEL FILE: DRAWN BY: COPYRIGHT: SHEET 7 Z002 Jeffrey H Woodruff 312_W_Hyman_04272022.pln Project No. 116 /Users/jeffreyw/Documents/Cloud Hill Design/312 W Hyman/312_W_Hyman_04272022.plnPowder Day Skiiing, LLC, David A Tarrab Mees Floor Area Calculations 312 W Hyman Ave 312 W Hyman Ave Lots P+Q, Block 46 Aspen CO 81611 USA/ Pitkin County UGB, City of Aspen 312 W Hyman Ave Aspen CO 81611 USA Account # R000145 Parcel ID # 273512464006 Landscape Architect Jennifer M. Dolecki-Smith, RLA Escape Garden Design, LLC Interior Design Travis Terry Travis Terry Design Contractor (At Final) Structural Engineer (As per contractor) Civil Grading and Drainage Boundaries Unlimited (Preliminary) COA- HPO Site Visit08/22/21 Jeffrey H. Woodruff AIA, LEED AP Cloud Hill Design, LLC Snowmass Snowmass CO 81654 USA COA- HPC Conceptual02/26/22 COA- HPC Conceptual04/27/22 5,976 sq ft 1,210 sq ft 489 sq ft 393 sq ft 760 sq ft 656 sq ft 272 sq ft 465 sq ft 1,081 sq ft A A B B C C D D E E 4 4 3 3 2 2 1 1 5'-0 1 / 6 4 "11'-3 3/4"308 sq ft Garden Storage (Under Stairs) Stairs Sq Footage Counted on Second Floor Growth commensurate with converting garage to habitable space Wall @ 4'-6" height to add to bedroom/habitable space under stairs, counted at 100% Sq Ft. 5' Set Back 10' R E A R S E T B A C K - P R I N C I P A L B U I L D I N G 5' R E A R S E T B A C K - P R I N C I P A L B U I L D I N G U S E D A S G A R A G E & A C C E S S O R Y B U I L D I N G 5' MINIMUM SIDE SETBACK5' MINIMUM SIDE SETBACK10' F R O N T S E T B A C K PRI N C I P A L B U I L D I N G 15' F R O N T S E T B A C K ACC E S S O R Y B U I L D I N G 952 sq ft 52 sq ft 311 sq ft 59 sq ft A A B B C C D D E E 4 4 3 3 2 2 1 1 Exterior Structural Stairs Counted on 2nd Floor Exterior Deck (Extended to the North) New Exterior Deck (North East) Down Floor Area Calculations City of Aspen 312 W Hyman Zoning Submission Proposed Main Level Floor Area Calculations Main Level Gross Floor Area (Sq Ft)1,210 Garage converted to habitable Main Level Countable Floor Area (Sq Ft)1,210 Table 26.575.020-2,Size of Garage or Carport First 0 to 250 square feet Proposed Deck/Porch Floor Area Calculations Front Porch Gross Floor Area (Sq Ft)363 Exempt per 15% of allowable, 15% of 3,240 = 486, Front deck is 311 and Rear Deck is 52, so 311 + 52 = 363 Deck/Porch Countable Floor Area (Sq Ft)0 Exempt per 26.575.020.D5 Structural Steps Floor Area (Sq Ft)59 Exempt per 26.575.020.D5, as per Assessor, exterior steps Deck/Porch Countable Floor Area (Sq Ft)0 Exempt per 15% of allowable 3240 *.15 = 486, 363 < 486 Total Existing Floor Area Calculations Sub-grade Floor Area (Sq Ft)0 Lower Level Floor Area (Sq Ft)1,210 Garage converted to habitable, extend habitable to the N and E Main Level Floor Area (Sq Ft)952 Extend floor plate to the North Total Proposed Floor Area (Sq Ft)2,162 Allowed is 3,240 SF Garage above 250, Square footage as per Next 251 to 500 square feet, 70 SF counts last 35 SF to F 29 Garage is 308 SF, so .5(58) = 29 2,191 Max floor area = 3,240 1,049 Remaining floor area = 3,240 - 2,191 = 1,049 Trash container is exempt Storage under the stairs is exempt Exterior stairs are exempt as per LUC 1 N SCALE: 1/8" = 1'-0" 1 Proposed Main Level Floor Area Z002 SCALE: 1/8" = 1'-0" 2 Second Floor- Floor Area Z002 113 SHEET TITLE INTEGRATED DESIGN TEAM PROJECT NO: MODEL FILE: DRAWN BY: COPYRIGHT: SHEET 8 Z003 Jeffrey H Woodruff 312_W_Hyman_04272022.pln Project No. 116 /Users/jeffreyw/Documents/Cloud Hill Design/312 W Hyman/312_W_Hyman_04272022.plnPowder Day Skiiing, LLC, David A Tarrab Mees Height Measurements 312 W Hyman Ave 312 W Hyman Ave Lots P+Q, Block 46 Aspen CO 81611 USA/ Pitkin County UGB, City of Aspen 312 W Hyman Ave Aspen CO 81611 USA Account # R000145 Parcel ID # 273512464006 Landscape Architect Jennifer M. Dolecki-Smith, RLA Escape Garden Design, LLC Interior Design Travis Terry Travis Terry Design Contractor (At Final) Structural Engineer (As per contractor) Civil Grading and Drainage Boundaries Unlimited (Preliminary) COA- HPO Site Visit08/22/21 Jeffrey H. Woodruff AIA, LEED AP Cloud Hill Design, LLC Snowmass Snowmass CO 81654 USA COA- HPC Conceptual02/26/22 COA- HPC Conceptual04/27/22 ±0" 1 First Floor ±0" 1 First Floor +9'-3" 2 Second Floor +9'-3" 2 Second Floor +18'-3" 3 Roof +18'-3" 3 Roof 19'-3"11'-9"9'-0" 22'-1 5/16" 23'-10" 25'-0" 12'-3" Existing WoodNew Wood Existing Opening Existing Wood Existing CMU Existing CMU New Stucco New Standing Seam Existing Grade (Most Restrictive) Existing Chimney Cap, Match Height Ridge Detached Garage ±0" 1 First Floor ±0" 1 First Floor +9'-3" 2 Second Floor +9'-3" 2 Second Floor +18'-3" 3 Roof +18'-3" 3 Roof 18'-3 1/ 2 " 19'-7 1/16"19'-7 1/16"25'-0"Existing Grade (Most Restrictive) SCALE: 1/4" = 1'-0" 2 West Elevation Height Z003 SCALE: 1/4" = 1'-0" 3 Existing South Elevation Z003 Zoning Note: Height Measurement (Z002): since the ridge line of the structure is below the height maximum, this works. 114 SHEET TITLE INTEGRATED DESIGN TEAM PROJECT NO: MODEL FILE: DRAWN BY: COPYRIGHT: SHEET 9 Z004 Jeffrey H Woodruff 312_W_Hyman_04272022.pln Project No. 116 /Users/jeffreyw/Documents/Cloud Hill Design/312 W Hyman/312_W_Hyman_04272022.plnPowder Day Skiiing, LLC, David A Tarrab Mees Wall Demolition Calculations 312 W Hyman Ave 312 W Hyman Ave Lots P+Q, Block 46 Aspen CO 81611 USA/ Pitkin County UGB, City of Aspen 312 W Hyman Ave Aspen CO 81611 USA Account # R000145 Parcel ID # 273512464006 Landscape Architect Jennifer M. Dolecki-Smith, RLA Escape Garden Design, LLC Interior Design Travis Terry Travis Terry Design Contractor (At Final) Structural Engineer (As per contractor) Civil Grading and Drainage Boundaries Unlimited (Preliminary) COA- HPO Site Visit08/22/21 Jeffrey H. Woodruff AIA, LEED AP Cloud Hill Design, LLC Snowmass Snowmass CO 81654 USA COA- HPC Conceptual02/26/22 COA- HPC Conceptual04/27/22 467 sq ft39 sq ft 535 sq ft 7 sq ft±0" 1 First Floor ±0" 1 First Floor +9'-3" 2 Second Floor +9'-3" 2 Second Floor +18'-3" 3 Roof +18'-3" 3 Roof 25 sq ft 14 sq ft 14 sq ft 11 sq ft 5 sq ft 76 sq ft The existing wall is 535 Square Feet. The reduction for fenestration is 91 Square Feet The wall area is 444 Square Feet. Demolition on the North Elevation, net of fenestration, is 376 Square Feet. A B 22 sq ft 20 sq ft95 sq ft 84 sq ft389 sq ft 70 sq ft 35 sq ft 32 sq ft 10 sq ft 13 sq ft 95 sq ft456 sq ft 83 sq ft 20 sq ft 20 sq ft±0" 1 First Floor ±0" 1 First Floor +9'-3" 2 Second Floor +9'-3" 2 Second Floor +18'-3" 3 Roof +18'-3" 3 Roof The existing wall is 654 Square Feet. The reduction for fenestration is 90 Square Feet The wall area is 564 Square Feet. Demolition on the East Elevation is 84+20 = 104 Square Feet, net of fenestration. C D EF 404 sq ft 35 sq ft 35 sq ft 10 sq ft 56 sq ft 56 sq ft 598 sq ft ±0" 1 First Floor ±0" 1 First Floor +9'-3" 2 Second Floor +9'-3" 2 Second Floor +18'-3" 3 Roof +18'-3" 3 Roof The existing wall is 598 Square Feet. The reduction for fenestration is 192 Square Feet The wall area is 406 Square Feet. No demolition on the South Facade 536 sq ft 22 sq ft 22 sq ft 10 sq ft 10 sq ft48 sq ft 647 sq ft 19 sq ft 48 sq ft ±0" 1 First Floor +9'-3" 2 Second Floor +18'-3" 3 Roof The existing wall is 647 Square Feet. The reduction for fenestration is 111 Square Feet The wall area is 536 Square Feet. The total demolition on the West Facade is 19 Square Feet. Demoltion Calculations City of Aspen 312 West Hyman Zoning Submission Wall Demolition Wall Label Individual Wall Area (Sq Ft) Area Reduced or Fenestration (Sq Ft) Area of Wall to be Removed (Sq Ft) A- North Wall 535 69 390 B- North Wall 39 24 15 C- East Wall 95 10 85 D- East Wall 20 0 20 E- East Wall 83 13 0 F- East Wall 456 67 0 G- South Wall 598 194 0 I- West Wall 647 111 67 Wall Surface Area Total (Sq Ft)2473 Area Reduced for Fenestration (Sq Ft)488 Area Used for Demo Calculation 577 Demolition Totals Roof and Wall Area Used for Demo Calculation (Sq Ft)577 Surface Area to be Removed (Sq Ft) Total 577 1 SCALE: 1/16" = 1'-0" 2 North Walls Wall A and Wall B Z004 SCALE: 1/16" = 1'-0" 3 East Walls Wall C and Wall D and Wall E Z004 SCALE: 1/16" = 1'-0" 4 South Walls F Z004 SCALE: 1/16" = 1'-0" 5 East Wall G Z004 115 SHEET TITLE INTEGRATED DESIGN TEAM PROJECT NO: MODEL FILE: DRAWN BY: COPYRIGHT: SHEET 10 Z005 Jeffrey H Woodruff 312_W_Hyman_04272022.pln Project No. 116 /Users/jeffreyw/Documents/Cloud Hill Design/312 W Hyman/312_W_Hyman_04272022.plnPowder Day Skiiing, LLC, David A Tarrab Mees Site Coverage 312 W Hyman Ave 312 W Hyman Ave Lots P+Q, Block 46 Aspen CO 81611 USA/ Pitkin County UGB, City of Aspen 312 W Hyman Ave Aspen CO 81611 USA Account # R000145 Parcel ID # 273512464006 Landscape Architect Jennifer M. Dolecki-Smith, RLA Escape Garden Design, LLC Interior Design Travis Terry Travis Terry Design Contractor (At Final) Structural Engineer (As per contractor) Civil Grading and Drainage Boundaries Unlimited (Preliminary) COA- HPO Site Visit08/22/21 Jeffrey H. Woodruff AIA, LEED AP Cloud Hill Design, LLC Snowmass Snowmass CO 81654 USA COA- HPC Conceptual02/26/22 COA- HPC Conceptual04/27/22 5,976 sq ft 1,211 sq ft 489 sq ft 393 sq ft 760 sq ft 656 sq ft 272 sq ft 465 sq ft 1,081 sq ft A A B B C C D D E E 4 4 3 3 2 2 1 1 5'-0 1 / 6 4 "11'-3 3/4"308 sq ft Garden Storage (Under Stairs) Stairs Sq Footage Counted on Second Floor Growth commensurate with converting garage to habitable space Wall @ 4'-6" height to add to bedroom/habitable space under stairs, counted at 100% Sq Ft. The Site is 5,976 Square Feet. The built environment is 1,196 Residence (For Square Footage Calculations: 1,196 + .5*58 Sq Ft) 29 Square Feet Storage, Exterior (Exempt) 32 Square Feet Trash Enclosure (Exempt) 308 Square Feet Garage (250 Sq Feet Exempt, 58 *.5 counts to Sq Ft. ) The new/proposed site coverage is 1,565/5,976 = 26.19% 5' Set Back 10' R E A R S E T B A C K - P R I N C I P A L B U I L D I N G 5' R E A R S E T B A C K - P R I N C I P A L B U I L D I N G U S E D A S G A R A G E & AC C E S S O R Y B U I L D I N G 5' MINIMUM SIDE SETBACK5' MINIMUM SIDE SETBACK10' F R O N T S E T B A C K PRI N C I P A L B U I L D I N G 15' F R O N T S E T B A C K ACC E S S O R Y B U I L D I N G Grav e l o f f alley 5,976 sq ft 789 sq ft 41 sq ft 16 sq ft 269 sq ft A A B B C C D D E E 4 4 3 3 2 2 1 1 Wall @ 4'-6" height to add to bedroom/habitable space under stairs, counted at 100% Sq Ft. The Site is 5,976 Square Feet. The built environment is 1,091 Residence (Attached Garage Included in site square footage) 41 Square Feet Storage- East 16 Square Feet Storage- North The existing site coverage is 1,148/5,976 = 19.21%10' R E A R S E T B A C K - P R I N C I P A L B U I L D I N G 5' R E A R S E T B A C K - P R I N C I P A L B U I L D I N G U S E D A S G A R A G E & AC C E S S O R Y B U I L D I N G 5' MINIMUM SIDE SETBACK5' MINIMUM SIDE SETBACK10' F R O N T S E T B A C K PRI N C I P A L B U I L D I N G 15' F R O N T S E T B A C K ACC E S S O R Y B U I L D I N G 10' R E A R S E T B A C K - P R I N C I P A L B U I L D I N G 5' R E A R S E T B A C K - P R I N C I P A L B U I L D I N G U S E D A S G A R A G E & AC C E S S O R Y B U I L D I N G N SCALE: 1/8" = 1'-0" 2 Proposed Site Coverage Z005 SCALE: 1/8" = 1'-0" 3 Existing Site Coverage Z005 116 SHEET TITLE INTEGRATED DESIGN TEAM PROJECT NO: MODEL FILE: DRAWN BY: COPYRIGHT: SHEET 11 Z006 Jeffrey H Woodruff 312_W_Hyman_04272022.pln Project No. 116 /Users/jeffreyw/Documents/Cloud Hill Design/312 W Hyman/312_W_Hyman_04272022.plnPowder Day Skiiing, LLC, David A Tarrab Mees Zoning Summary 312 W Hyman Ave 312 W Hyman Ave Lots P+Q, Block 46 Aspen CO 81611 USA/ Pitkin County UGB, City of Aspen 312 W Hyman Ave Aspen CO 81611 USA Account # R000145 Parcel ID # 273512464006 Landscape Architect Jennifer M. Dolecki-Smith, RLA Escape Garden Design, LLC Interior Design Travis Terry Travis Terry Design Contractor (At Final) Structural Engineer (As per contractor) Civil Grading and Drainage Boundaries Unlimited (Preliminary) COA- HPO Site Visit08/22/21 Jeffrey H. Woodruff AIA, LEED AP Cloud Hill Design, LLC Snowmass Snowmass CO 81654 USA COA- HPC Conceptual02/26/22 COA- HPC Conceptual04/27/22 Proposed Development Zoning Allowance and Project Summary City of Aspen 312 W Hyman Zoning Submission Proposed Development Single Family | Remodel Addition Parcel #273512464006 Zone District R6 Existing Allowed (Principal)Allowed (Accessory) Proposed (Principal) Proposed Accessory LUC Reference Setbacks 26.710.060 Front 19’-7”25’25’19’-7”n/a 26.710.060 Rear 33’-6”10’5’33’-6”5’26.710.060 Combined Front/Rear 26.710.060 East Side 2’-4”5’5’2’-4”5’26.710.060 West Side 11 2/3’10’10’11 2/3’5’26.710.040 Medium-Density Residential (R-6). Combined Side 15’15’15’7’-4”, No change to West Principal 5’, Variance Required for the West Garage D 4 is Minimum combined 10’ Distance between Buildings N/A N/A 11.07’, between the garage and the principal N/A 11.07’, between the garage and the principal 26.710.060 Corner Lot No No n/a No na/26.710.060 Floor Area (Square Feet)1,669 3,240 2,171 Supplemental Breakdown Info Existing Required Proposed LUC Reference Net Leasable/Comm (Sq Ft)Not Req for Residential N/A 26.575.020.I. Open Space %80.79%Not Req for R-6 73.81%26.710.060 Site Coverage 19.21%Not Req for R-6 26.19%26.710.060 On-Site Parking 2 2 2 26.515.030 Site Coverage Existing LUC Reference Gross Lot Area (Sq Ft)5,976 5,976 Z-007 Area of Building Footprint (Sq Ft)1148 1091+41+16 1,579 1210+29+32+308 26.575.020.G. Site Coverage 19.21%26.42% Land Value Summary Actual Value Land $3,200,000 Improvements $718,000 Total $3,918,000 1 117 SHEET TITLE INTEGRATED DESIGN TEAM PROJECT NO: MODEL FILE: DRAWN BY: COPYRIGHT: SHEET 12 Z008 Jeffrey H Woodruff 312_W_Hyman_04272022.pln Project No. 116 /Users/jeffreyw/Documents/Cloud Hill Design/312 W Hyman/312_W_Hyman_04272022.plnPowder Day Skiiing, LLC, David A Tarrab Mees Forestry Site Coverage 312 W Hyman Ave 312 W Hyman Ave Lots P+Q, Block 46 Aspen CO 81611 USA/ Pitkin County UGB, City of Aspen 312 W Hyman Ave Aspen CO 81611 USA Account # R000145 Parcel ID # 273512464006 Landscape Architect Jennifer M. Dolecki-Smith, RLA Escape Garden Design, LLC Interior Design Travis Terry Travis Terry Design Contractor (At Final) Structural Engineer (As per contractor) Civil Grading and Drainage Boundaries Unlimited (Preliminary) COA- HPO Site Visit08/22/21 Jeffrey H. Woodruff AIA, LEED AP Cloud Hill Design, LLC Snowmass Snowmass CO 81654 USA COA- HPC Conceptual02/26/22 COA- HPC Conceptual04/27/22 5,976 sq ft 488.75 sq ft 392.75 sq ft 760.25 sq ft 656.25 sq ft 271.75 sq ft 464.75 sq ft 1,081 sq ft 1 2 3 4 5 678 9 10 1112131415 16 10' F R O N T S E T B A C K PRI N C I P A L B U I L D I N G5' MINIMUM SIDE SETBACKSCALE: 1/8" = 1'-0" 1 First Floor- Tree Z008 Site Total 5,976+- SF Tree Protection Zone/Pervious Space North/East Trees 680.25 SF South State Tree 760.25 SF Tree Site Coverage 1,440.50 SF Tree Site % 24.10% Impervious Site Coverage Chalet 1210.75 SF Garage 307.5 SF Enclosure 32.25 SF Build out site 1550.50 Build out site % 25.95% Pervious Open Space North 1064.50 SF South East 488.75 SF South West 392.75 SF West Tree 464.75 SF * East Tree 271.75 SF * Open Space 2682.50 Open Space% 44.89% Pavers/skirt ~5.06 % * East and West Deciduous trees counted toward open space North West Garage/Trash Enclosure Strengths: º Aligned with existing site disturbance, the railroad tie retaining wall º Leaves the largest open space in the backyard º No/little impact to trees #3, #4 and #5 and no impact to Aspens along East property line º Does not interfere with existing utilities (maybe gas, but not electric) º Benefits to house across alley (north), views to Shadow Mountain º Minor negative to St Moritz, but ridge line is 12'-6" and grade steps down 3' grade (from the property line to the NE corner of the garage) and 6' retaining wall, so impact is negligible to St Moritz º Distance between the Garage and the Residence is 11', goes to 12' with the 2.5' side setback º Keep all trees, gravel between the alley and the garage º Distance between the property line and Tree #1 is 15'-7", if the neighboring retaining wall is plum and does not encroach on the West property line. Weaknesses: º Minimal impacts to Trees #1 and #2, development, both permeable and hardscape in the Tree #1 drip-line 13' from retaining wall to tree #1 (layout assumes less than 5' setback or additional/variance to combined side setback in R6. If the retaining wall was plum this measurement would be 15' º Impact to existing utilities, gas, which runs to the West and South of tree #1 º Difficult entry, entry from the East due to grade changes at the alley º Drainage 118 SHEET TITLE INTEGRATED DESIGN TEAM PROJECT NO: MODEL FILE: DRAWN BY: COPYRIGHT: SHEET 13 A101 Jeffrey H Woodruff 312_W_Hyman_04272022.pln Project No. 116 /Users/jeffreyw/Documents/Cloud Hill Design/312 W Hyman/312_W_Hyman_04272022.plnPowder Day Skiiing, LLC, David A Tarrab Mees Architectural Site Plan 312 W Hyman Ave 312 W Hyman Ave Lots P+Q, Block 46 Aspen CO 81611 USA/ Pitkin County UGB, City of Aspen 312 W Hyman Ave Aspen CO 81611 USA Account # R000145 Parcel ID # 273512464006 Landscape Architect Jennifer M. Dolecki-Smith, RLA Escape Garden Design, LLC Interior Design Travis Terry Travis Terry Design Contractor (At Final) Structural Engineer (As per contractor) Civil Grading and Drainage Boundaries Unlimited (Preliminary) COA- HPO Site Visit08/22/21 Jeffrey H. Woodruff AIA, LEED AP Cloud Hill Design, LLC Snowmass Snowmass CO 81654 USA COA- HPC Conceptual02/26/22 COA- HPC Conceptual04/27/22 1,210.5 sq ft A A B B C C D D E E 4 4 3 3 2 2 1 1 1.55 5 ' 2.40 6 '5.011'11.6 8 ' 8.167'10.167'10'4.25'9'11.749'19.25'5.00 1 '11.313'308 sq ft Proposed fence at the 5' side setback and 5' rear setback, lined on the South with shrubs, see landscaping plan St Moritz R e t a i n i n g w a l l ( e x i s t i n g and under r e h a b i l i t a t i o n ) Removal of T r e e s # 1 a n d # 2 Removal of T r e e s # 1 a n d # 2 E EG OS W7904790379027901 7901 7901 790179 0 2 7902 790379 0 3 7 9 0 4 10' R E A R S E T B A C K - P R I N C I P A L B U I L D I N G 5' R E A R S E T B A C K - P R I N C I P A L B U I L D I N G U S E D A S G A R A G E & AC C E S S O R Y B U I L D I N G 5' MINIMUM SIDE SETBACK10' F R O N T S E T B A C K PRI N C I P A L B U I L D I N G 15' F R O N T S E T B A C K ACC E S S O R Y B U I L D I N G N SCALE: 1/8" = 1'-0" 1 Architectural Site Plan A101 119 SHEET TITLE INTEGRATED DESIGN TEAM PROJECT NO: MODEL FILE: DRAWN BY: COPYRIGHT: SHEET 14 A102 Jeffrey H Woodruff 312_W_Hyman_04272022.pln Project No. 116 /Users/jeffreyw/Documents/Cloud Hill Design/312 W Hyman/312_W_Hyman_04272022.plnPowder Day Skiiing, LLC, David A Tarrab Mees Architectural Site Drainage Plan 312 W Hyman Ave 312 W Hyman Ave Lots P+Q, Block 46 Aspen CO 81611 USA/ Pitkin County UGB, City of Aspen 312 W Hyman Ave Aspen CO 81611 USA Account # R000145 Parcel ID # 273512464006 Landscape Architect Jennifer M. Dolecki-Smith, RLA Escape Garden Design, LLC Interior Design Travis Terry Travis Terry Design Contractor (At Final) Structural Engineer (As per contractor) Civil Grading and Drainage Boundaries Unlimited (Preliminary) COA- HPO Site Visit08/22/21 Jeffrey H. Woodruff AIA, LEED AP Cloud Hill Design, LLC Snowmass Snowmass CO 81654 USA COA- HPC Conceptual02/26/22 COA- HPC Conceptual04/27/22 A A B B C C D D E E 4 4 3 3 2 2 1 1 100' 100' 1 A301 2 A301 4 Z004 2 A210 1 A211 3 A211 4 A211 #DrgID #LayID potential tree removal (2) to NW trees protected (3) to NE Plaster covered CMU wall with two layers of 5/8" Type X Gypsum, 1 hour fire wall Garage and enclosure meet rear and side setbacks. Existing rail ties are not plumb. Avoid current hazard. UP bedroom #2 bathe #3 mechanical boot c u b b i e s trash & r e c y c l i n g e n c l o s u r e bathe #2 buried dry- well, storm water run-off onsite collection new perf- pipe surrounding single car garage disturbance, drains to dry well in the North-East of the lot provide tree protection zone (TPZ) for existing trees to the North East of the site closet boot c u b b i e s & be n c h bedroom #3 main entry heat pumps (2)electric meters (2)gas & radon egress egress egress entry/mud w/d garden storage 1 A300 2 A300 1 A200 2 A2002 Z003 N SCALE: 1/8" = 1'-0" 1 Site Plan Draft Drainage A102 120 SHEET TITLE INTEGRATED DESIGN TEAM PROJECT NO: MODEL FILE: DRAWN BY: COPYRIGHT: SHEET 15 A103 Jeffrey H Woodruff 312_W_Hyman_04272022.pln Project No. 116 /Users/jeffreyw/Documents/Cloud Hill Design/312 W Hyman/312_W_Hyman_04272022.plnPowder Day Skiiing, LLC, David A Tarrab Mees Main Level Proposed Plan 312 W Hyman Ave 312 W Hyman Ave Lots P+Q, Block 46 Aspen CO 81611 USA/ Pitkin County UGB, City of Aspen 312 W Hyman Ave Aspen CO 81611 USA Account # R000145 Parcel ID # 273512464006 Landscape Architect Jennifer M. Dolecki-Smith, RLA Escape Garden Design, LLC Interior Design Travis Terry Travis Terry Design Contractor (At Final) Structural Engineer (As per contractor) Civil Grading and Drainage Boundaries Unlimited (Preliminary) COA- HPO Site Visit08/22/21 Jeffrey H. Woodruff AIA, LEED AP Cloud Hill Design, LLC Snowmass Snowmass CO 81654 USA COA- HPC Conceptual02/26/22 COA- HPC Conceptual04/27/22 A B C D E 4 4 3 3 2 2 1 1 16'-4 5 / 8 "20'-4"8'-2 1 7 / 6 4 "43'-0 9/64"32'-7"23'-9 3/8"16'-2 21/32"1'-6 2 1 / 3 2 " 2'-4 7 / 8 "5'-0 1/8"11'-8 5 / 3 2 " 8'-2"10'-2"10'-0"4'-3"9'-0"11'-9"19'-3"100' 100' 1 A301 2 A301 4 Z004 2 A210 1 A211 3 A211 4 A211 potential tree removal (2) to NW trees protected (3) to NE Plaster covered CMU wall with two layers of 5/8" Type X Gypsum, 1 hour fire wall Garage and enclosure meet rear and side setbacks. Existing rail ties are not plumb. Avoid current hazard. Proposed fence at the 5' side setback and 5' rear setback, lined on the South with shrubs, see landscaping plan St Moritz R e t a i n i n g w a l l ( e x i s t i n g and under r e h a b i l i t a t i o n ) UP bedroom #2 bathe #3 mechanical boot c u b b i e s trash & r e c y c l i n g e n c l o s u r e bathe #2 closet boot c u b b i e s & be n c h bedroom #3 main entry heat pumps (2) electric meters (2) gas & radon egress egress egress entry/mud w/d garden storage Grav e l o f f alley 1 A300 2 A300 1 A200 2 A200 2 Z003 N SCALE: 1/4" = 1'-0" 1 First Floor A103 121 SHEET TITLE INTEGRATED DESIGN TEAM PROJECT NO: MODEL FILE: DRAWN BY: COPYRIGHT: SHEET 16 A104 Jeffrey H Woodruff 312_W_Hyman_04272022.pln Project No. 116 /Users/jeffreyw/Documents/Cloud Hill Design/312 W Hyman/312_W_Hyman_04272022.plnPowder Day Skiiing, LLC, David A Tarrab Mees Second Level Proposed Plan 312 W Hyman Ave 312 W Hyman Ave Lots P+Q, Block 46 Aspen CO 81611 USA/ Pitkin County UGB, City of Aspen 312 W Hyman Ave Aspen CO 81611 USA Account # R000145 Parcel ID # 273512464006 Landscape Architect Jennifer M. Dolecki-Smith, RLA Escape Garden Design, LLC Interior Design Travis Terry Travis Terry Design Contractor (At Final) Structural Engineer (As per contractor) Civil Grading and Drainage Boundaries Unlimited (Preliminary) COA- HPO Site Visit08/22/21 Jeffrey H. Woodruff AIA, LEED AP Cloud Hill Design, LLC Snowmass Snowmass CO 81654 USA COA- HPC Conceptual02/26/22 COA- HPC Conceptual04/27/22 A A B B C C D D E E 4 4 3 3 2 2 1 1 FDWRE F1 A301 2 A301 4 Z004 2 A210 9'-3" 9'-3" 1 A300 2 A300 1 A200 2 A200 2 Z003 kitchen bathe #1 living room down deck deck fireplace bedroom 1 closetegress down N SCALE: 1/4" = 1'-0" 1 Second Floor A104 122 SHEET TITLE INTEGRATED DESIGN TEAM PROJECT NO: MODEL FILE: DRAWN BY: COPYRIGHT: SHEET 17 A105 Jeffrey H Woodruff 312_W_Hyman_04272022.pln Project No. 116 /Users/jeffreyw/Documents/Cloud Hill Design/312 W Hyman/312_W_Hyman_04272022.plnPowder Day Skiiing, LLC, David A Tarrab Mees Roof Plan Proposed 312 W Hyman Ave 312 W Hyman Ave Lots P+Q, Block 46 Aspen CO 81611 USA/ Pitkin County UGB, City of Aspen 312 W Hyman Ave Aspen CO 81611 USA Account # R000145 Parcel ID # 273512464006 Landscape Architect Jennifer M. Dolecki-Smith, RLA Escape Garden Design, LLC Interior Design Travis Terry Travis Terry Design Contractor (At Final) Structural Engineer (As per contractor) Civil Grading and Drainage Boundaries Unlimited (Preliminary) COA- HPO Site Visit08/22/21 Jeffrey H. Woodruff AIA, LEED AP Cloud Hill Design, LLC Snowmass Snowmass CO 81654 USA COA- HPC Conceptual02/26/22 COA- HPC Conceptual04/27/22W 98N6'-0" 3'-6"Sill 1'-3 39/64"W 99N6'-0" 3'-6"Sill 1'-3 39/64"W 100N6'-0" 3'-6"Sill 1'-3 39/64"A B C D E 4 4 3 3 2 2 1 1 1' Overhang, typ. Protected entry Solar as per onsite Energy Requirements 4:12 4:12 3.5:12 3.5:12 3.5:12 3.5:12 N SCALE: 1/4" = 1'-0" 1 Roof Plan A105 Note: Today this is a cold roof with attic vents. The current attic vents and screens are in disrepair (upon viewing from the attic) We are proposing removing the dropped ceiling, removing the attic vents and exposing the rafters, adding insulation and updating the light and vent in a Chalet style. The only exterior change, will be converting the attic vents to the same size rough opening, but installing hopper fenestration for light and vent. U-Value for horizontal fenestration = .50 as per IECC 2021 123 SHEET TITLE INTEGRATED DESIGN TEAM PROJECT NO: MODEL FILE: DRAWN BY: COPYRIGHT: SHEET 18 A106 Jeffrey H Woodruff 312_W_Hyman_04272022.pln Project No. 116 /Users/jeffreyw/Documents/Cloud Hill Design/312 W Hyman/312_W_Hyman_04272022.plnPowder Day Skiiing, LLC, David A Tarrab Mees Main Level Existing Plan 312 W Hyman Ave 312 W Hyman Ave Lots P+Q, Block 46 Aspen CO 81611 USA/ Pitkin County UGB, City of Aspen 312 W Hyman Ave Aspen CO 81611 USA Account # R000145 Parcel ID # 273512464006 Landscape Architect Jennifer M. Dolecki-Smith, RLA Escape Garden Design, LLC Interior Design Travis Terry Travis Terry Design Contractor (At Final) Structural Engineer (As per contractor) Civil Grading and Drainage Boundaries Unlimited (Preliminary) COA- HPO Site Visit08/22/21 Jeffrey H. Woodruff AIA, LEED AP Cloud Hill Design, LLC Snowmass Snowmass CO 81654 USA COA- HPC Conceptual02/26/22 COA- HPC Conceptual04/27/22 41 sq ft A A B B C C D D E E 4 4 3 3 2 2 1 1 W/D W/D 6'-10" 3 Z003 2 Z004 3 Z004 2 A204 KITCHEN BATHROOM BEDROOM LIVING ROOM F.P. STORAGE BEDROOM CLOSET STORAGE GARAGE MECHANICAL STORAGE GARAGE UP N SCALE: 1/4" = 1'-0" 1 First Floor Existing A106 124 SHEET TITLE INTEGRATED DESIGN TEAM PROJECT NO: MODEL FILE: DRAWN BY: COPYRIGHT: SHEET 19 A107 Jeffrey H Woodruff 312_W_Hyman_04272022.pln Project No. 116 /Users/jeffreyw/Documents/Cloud Hill Design/312 W Hyman/312_W_Hyman_04272022.plnPowder Day Skiiing, LLC, David A Tarrab Mees Second Level Existing Plan 312 W Hyman Ave 312 W Hyman Ave Lots P+Q, Block 46 Aspen CO 81611 USA/ Pitkin County UGB, City of Aspen 312 W Hyman Ave Aspen CO 81611 USA Account # R000145 Parcel ID # 273512464006 Landscape Architect Jennifer M. Dolecki-Smith, RLA Escape Garden Design, LLC Interior Design Travis Terry Travis Terry Design Contractor (At Final) Structural Engineer (As per contractor) Civil Grading and Drainage Boundaries Unlimited (Preliminary) COA- HPO Site Visit08/22/21 Jeffrey H. Woodruff AIA, LEED AP Cloud Hill Design, LLC Snowmass Snowmass CO 81654 USA COA- HPC Conceptual02/26/22 COA- HPC Conceptual04/27/22 A A B B C C D D E E 4 4 3 3 2 2 1 1 3 Z003 2 Z004 3 Z004 2 A204 11'-5 1/16" KITCHEN BATH BEDROOM LIVING ROOM F.P. BEDROOM CLOSET DOWN DOWN N SCALE: 1/4" = 1'-0" 1 Second Floor Existing A107 125 SHEET TITLE INTEGRATED DESIGN TEAM PROJECT NO: MODEL FILE: DRAWN BY: COPYRIGHT: SHEET 20 A108 Jeffrey H Woodruff 312_W_Hyman_04272022.pln Project No. 116 /Users/jeffreyw/Documents/Cloud Hill Design/312 W Hyman/312_W_Hyman_04272022.plnPowder Day Skiiing, LLC, David A Tarrab Mees Roof Plan Existing 312 W Hyman Ave 312 W Hyman Ave Lots P+Q, Block 46 Aspen CO 81611 USA/ Pitkin County UGB, City of Aspen 312 W Hyman Ave Aspen CO 81611 USA Account # R000145 Parcel ID # 273512464006 Landscape Architect Jennifer M. Dolecki-Smith, RLA Escape Garden Design, LLC Interior Design Travis Terry Travis Terry Design Contractor (At Final) Structural Engineer (As per contractor) Civil Grading and Drainage Boundaries Unlimited (Preliminary) COA- HPO Site Visit08/22/21 Jeffrey H. Woodruff AIA, LEED AP Cloud Hill Design, LLC Snowmass Snowmass CO 81654 USA COA- HPC Conceptual02/26/22 COA- HPC Conceptual04/27/22 A A B B C C D D E E 4 4 3 3 2 2 1 1 3 Z003 2 Z004 3 Z004 2 A204 3.5:12 3.5:12 3.5:12 3.5:12 SCALE: 1/4" = 1'-0" 1 Roof Existing A108 126 SHEET TITLE INTEGRATED DESIGN TEAM PROJECT NO: MODEL FILE: DRAWN BY: COPYRIGHT: SHEET 21 A200 Jeffrey H Woodruff 312_W_Hyman_04272022.pln Project No. 116 /Users/jeffreyw/Documents/Cloud Hill Design/312 W Hyman/312_W_Hyman_04272022.plnPowder Day Skiiing, LLC, David A Tarrab Mees Elevations Proposed 312 W Hyman Ave 312 W Hyman Ave Lots P+Q, Block 46 Aspen CO 81611 USA/ Pitkin County UGB, City of Aspen 312 W Hyman Ave Aspen CO 81611 USA Account # R000145 Parcel ID # 273512464006 Landscape Architect Jennifer M. Dolecki-Smith, RLA Escape Garden Design, LLC Interior Design Travis Terry Travis Terry Design Contractor (At Final) Structural Engineer (As per contractor) Civil Grading and Drainage Boundaries Unlimited (Preliminary) COA- HPO Site Visit08/22/21 Jeffrey H. Woodruff AIA, LEED AP Cloud Hill Design, LLC Snowmass Snowmass CO 81654 USA COA- HPC Conceptual02/26/22 COA- HPC Conceptual04/27/22 ±0" 1 First Floor ±0" 1 First Floor +9'-3" 2 Second Floor +9'-3" 2 Second Floor +18'-3" 3 Roof +18'-3" 3 Roof New Wood Existing Wood New CMU Existing Wood Existing Synthetic Treads ±0" 1 First Floor +9'-3" 2 Second Floor +18'-3" 3 Roof Existing Wood Existing CMU New CMU New Wood Balcony Existing Standing Seam New Wood New WoodNew Stucco New Skylights New Masonry New CMU New Storage SCALE: 1/4" = 1'-0" 1 North Elevation A200 SCALE: 1/4" = 1'-0" 2 East Elevation A200 127 SHEET TITLE INTEGRATED DESIGN TEAM PROJECT NO: MODEL FILE: DRAWN BY: COPYRIGHT: SHEET 22 A201 Jeffrey H Woodruff 312_W_Hyman_04272022.pln Project No. 116 /Users/jeffreyw/Documents/Cloud Hill Design/312 W Hyman/312_W_Hyman_04272022.plnPowder Day Skiiing, LLC, David A Tarrab Mees Elevations Proposed 312 W Hyman Ave 312 W Hyman Ave Lots P+Q, Block 46 Aspen CO 81611 USA/ Pitkin County UGB, City of Aspen 312 W Hyman Ave Aspen CO 81611 USA Account # R000145 Parcel ID # 273512464006 Landscape Architect Jennifer M. Dolecki-Smith, RLA Escape Garden Design, LLC Interior Design Travis Terry Travis Terry Design Contractor (At Final) Structural Engineer (As per contractor) Civil Grading and Drainage Boundaries Unlimited (Preliminary) COA- HPO Site Visit08/22/21 Jeffrey H. Woodruff AIA, LEED AP Cloud Hill Design, LLC Snowmass Snowmass CO 81654 USA COA- HPC Conceptual02/26/22 COA- HPC Conceptual04/27/22 ±0" 1 First Floor ±0" 1 First Floor +9'-3" 2 Second Floor +9'-3" 2 Second Floor +18'-3" 3 Roof +18'-3" 3 Roof Existing CMU Existing Wood Eave Triangular Fenestration, As per revised guidance ±0" 1 First Floor +9'-3" 2 Second Floor +18'-3" 3 Roof 22'-1 5/16" 23'-10" 25'-0" 12'-0 15/32" Existing WoodNew Wood Existing Opening Existing Wood Existing CMU Existing CMU New Stucco New Standing Seam SCALE: 1/4" = 1'-0" 1 South Elevation A201 SCALE: 1/4" = 1'-0" 2 West Elevation A201 128 SHEET TITLE INTEGRATED DESIGN TEAM PROJECT NO: MODEL FILE: DRAWN BY: COPYRIGHT: SHEET 23 A203 Jeffrey H Woodruff 312_W_Hyman_04272022.pln Project No. 116 /Users/jeffreyw/Documents/Cloud Hill Design/312 W Hyman/312_W_Hyman_04272022.plnPowder Day Skiiing, LLC, David A Tarrab Mees Existing Elevations 312 W Hyman Ave 312 W Hyman Ave Lots P+Q, Block 46 Aspen CO 81611 USA/ Pitkin County UGB, City of Aspen 312 W Hyman Ave Aspen CO 81611 USA Account # R000145 Parcel ID # 273512464006 Landscape Architect Jennifer M. Dolecki-Smith, RLA Escape Garden Design, LLC Interior Design Travis Terry Travis Terry Design Contractor (At Final) Structural Engineer (As per contractor) Civil Grading and Drainage Boundaries Unlimited (Preliminary) COA- HPO Site Visit08/22/21 Jeffrey H. Woodruff AIA, LEED AP Cloud Hill Design, LLC Snowmass Snowmass CO 81654 USA COA- HPC Conceptual02/26/22 COA- HPC Conceptual04/27/22 ±0" 1 First Floor ±0" 1 First Floor +9'-3" 2 Second Floor +9'-3" 2 Second Floor +18'-3" 3 Roof +18'-3" 3 Roof ±0" 1 First Floor ±0" 1 First Floor +9'-3" 2 Second Floor +9'-3" 2 Second Floor +18'-3" 3 Roof +18'-3" 3 Roof SCALE: 1/4" = 1'-0" 1 Existing North Elevation A203 SCALE: 1/4" = 1'-0" 2 Existing East Elevation A203 SCALE: 1:0.33 3 312wHyman_WEB303 A203 SCALE: 1:0.33 4 312wHyman_WEB304 A203 129 SHEET TITLE INTEGRATED DESIGN TEAM PROJECT NO: MODEL FILE: DRAWN BY: COPYRIGHT: SHEET 24 A204 Jeffrey H Woodruff 312_W_Hyman_04272022.pln Project No. 116 /Users/jeffreyw/Documents/Cloud Hill Design/312 W Hyman/312_W_Hyman_04272022.plnPowder Day Skiiing, LLC, David A Tarrab Mees Existing Elevations 312 W Hyman Ave 312 W Hyman Ave Lots P+Q, Block 46 Aspen CO 81611 USA/ Pitkin County UGB, City of Aspen 312 W Hyman Ave Aspen CO 81611 USA Account # R000145 Parcel ID # 273512464006 Landscape Architect Jennifer M. Dolecki-Smith, RLA Escape Garden Design, LLC Interior Design Travis Terry Travis Terry Design Contractor (At Final) Structural Engineer (As per contractor) Civil Grading and Drainage Boundaries Unlimited (Preliminary) COA- HPO Site Visit08/22/21 Jeffrey H. Woodruff AIA, LEED AP Cloud Hill Design, LLC Snowmass Snowmass CO 81654 USA COA- HPC Conceptual02/26/22 COA- HPC Conceptual04/27/22 ±0" 1 First Floor ±0" 1 First Floor +9'-3" 2 Second Floor +9'-3" 2 Second Floor +18'-3" 3 Roof +18'-3" 3 Roof 18'-3 1 / 2 " 19'-7 1/16"19'-7 1/16"25'-0"Existing Grade (Most Restrictive) 1 2 3 4 ±0" 1 First Floor ±0" 1 First Floor +9'-3" 2 Second Floor +9'-3" 2 Second Floor +18'-3" 3 Roof +18'-3" 3 Roof SCALE: 1/4" = 1'-0" 1 Existing South Elevation A204 SCALE: 1/4" = 1'-0" 2 Existing West Elevation A204 SCALE: 1:0.27 3 312wHyman_WEB301 A204 SCALE: 1:0.26 4 312wHyman_WEB302 A204 130 SHEET TITLE INTEGRATED DESIGN TEAM PROJECT NO: MODEL FILE: DRAWN BY: COPYRIGHT: SHEET 25 A210 Jeffrey H Woodruff 312_W_Hyman_04272022.pln Project No. 116 /Users/jeffreyw/Documents/Cloud Hill Design/312 W Hyman/312_W_Hyman_04272022.plnPowder Day Skiiing, LLC, David A Tarrab Mees Fence Layout 312 W Hyman Ave 312 W Hyman Ave Lots P+Q, Block 46 Aspen CO 81611 USA/ Pitkin County UGB, City of Aspen 312 W Hyman Ave Aspen CO 81611 USA Account # R000145 Parcel ID # 273512464006 Landscape Architect Jennifer M. Dolecki-Smith, RLA Escape Garden Design, LLC Interior Design Travis Terry Travis Terry Design Contractor (At Final) Structural Engineer (As per contractor) Civil Grading and Drainage Boundaries Unlimited (Preliminary) COA- HPO Site Visit08/22/21 Jeffrey H. Woodruff AIA, LEED AP Cloud Hill Design, LLC Snowmass Snowmass CO 81654 USA COA- HPC Conceptual02/26/22 COA- HPC Conceptual04/27/22 1,210.5 sq ft A A B B C C D D E E 4 4 3 3 2 2 1 1 1.55 5 ' 2.40 6 '5.011'11.6 8 ' 8.167'10.167'10'4.25'9'11.749'19.25'5.00 1 '11.313'308 sq ft Proposed fence at the 5' side setback and 5' rear setback, lined on the South with shrubs, see landscaping plan St Moritz R e t a i n i n g w a l l ( e x i s t i n g and under r e h a b i l i t a t i o n ) Removal of T r e e # 2 Removal of T r e e # 1 E EG OS W7904790379027901 7901 7901 790179 0 2 7902 790379 0 3 7 9 0 4 10' R E A R S E T B A C K - P R I N C I P A L B U I L D I N G 5' R E A R S E T B A C K - P R I N C I P A L B U I L D I N G U S E D A S G A R A G E & AC C E S S O R Y B U I L D I N G 5' MINIMUM SIDE SETBACK10' F R O N T S E T B A C K PRI N C I P A L B U I L D I N G 15' F R O N T S E T B A C K ACC E S S O R Y B U I L D I N G ±0.000' 1 First Floor ±0.000' 1 First Floor +9.250' 2 Second Floor +9.250' 2 Second Floor +18.250' 3 Roof +18.250' 3 Roof 6'31.35' New 6" WoodNew Stucco N SCALE: 1/16" = 1'-0" 1 Architectural Site Plan A210 SCALE: 1/4" = 1'-0" 2 Garage South Elevation A210 131 SHEET TITLE INTEGRATED DESIGN TEAM PROJECT NO: MODEL FILE: DRAWN BY: COPYRIGHT: SHEET 26 A211 Jeffrey H Woodruff 312_W_Hyman_04272022.pln Project No. 116 /Users/jeffreyw/Documents/Cloud Hill Design/312 W Hyman/312_W_Hyman_04272022.plnPowder Day Skiiing, LLC, David A Tarrab Mees Garage Elevations 312 W Hyman Ave 312 W Hyman Ave Lots P+Q, Block 46 Aspen CO 81611 USA/ Pitkin County UGB, City of Aspen 312 W Hyman Ave Aspen CO 81611 USA Account # R000145 Parcel ID # 273512464006 Landscape Architect Jennifer M. Dolecki-Smith, RLA Escape Garden Design, LLC Interior Design Travis Terry Travis Terry Design Contractor (At Final) Structural Engineer (As per contractor) Civil Grading and Drainage Boundaries Unlimited (Preliminary) COA- HPO Site Visit08/22/21 Jeffrey H. Woodruff AIA, LEED AP Cloud Hill Design, LLC Snowmass Snowmass CO 81654 USA COA- HPC Conceptual02/26/22 COA- HPC Conceptual04/27/22 ±0" 1 First Floor +9'-3" 2 Second Floor +18'-3" 3 Roof ±0" 1 First Floor +9'-3" 2 Second Floor +18'-3" 3 Roof 6'-0"31'-4 13/64" New 6" WoodNew Stucco ±0" 1 First Floor ±0" 1 First Floor +9'-3" 2 Second Floor +9'-3" 2 Second Floor +18'-3" 3 Roof +18'-3" 3 Roof ±0" 1 First Floor +9'-3" 2 Second Floor +18'-3" 3 Roof SCALE: 1/4" = 1'-0" 1 Garage Elevation North A211 SCALE: 1/4" = 1'-0" 2 Garage South Elevation A211 SCALE: 1/4" = 1'-0" 3 East Elevation A211 SCALE: 1/4" = 1'-0" 4 West Elevation A211 132 SHEET TITLE INTEGRATED DESIGN TEAM PROJECT NO: MODEL FILE: DRAWN BY: COPYRIGHT: SHEET 27 A300 Jeffrey H Woodruff 312_W_Hyman_04272022.pln Project No. 116 /Users/jeffreyw/Documents/Cloud Hill Design/312 W Hyman/312_W_Hyman_04272022.plnPowder Day Skiiing, LLC, David A Tarrab Mees Transverse Sections 312 W Hyman Ave 312 W Hyman Ave Lots P+Q, Block 46 Aspen CO 81611 USA/ Pitkin County UGB, City of Aspen 312 W Hyman Ave Aspen CO 81611 USA Account # R000145 Parcel ID # 273512464006 Landscape Architect Jennifer M. Dolecki-Smith, RLA Escape Garden Design, LLC Interior Design Travis Terry Travis Terry Design Contractor (At Final) Structural Engineer (As per contractor) Civil Grading and Drainage Boundaries Unlimited (Preliminary) COA- HPO Site Visit08/22/21 Jeffrey H. Woodruff AIA, LEED AP Cloud Hill Design, LLC Snowmass Snowmass CO 81654 USA COA- HPC Conceptual02/26/22 COA- HPC Conceptual04/27/22 E D C B A ±0" 1 First Floor E D C B A ±0" 1 First Floor SCALE: 1/4" = 1'-0" 1 transverse at Stairs A300SCALE: 1/4" = 1'-0" 2 transverse at Bedroom #2 A300 133 SHEET TITLE INTEGRATED DESIGN TEAM PROJECT NO: MODEL FILE: DRAWN BY: COPYRIGHT: SHEET 28 A301 Jeffrey H Woodruff 312_W_Hyman_04272022.pln Project No. 116 /Users/jeffreyw/Documents/Cloud Hill Design/312 W Hyman/312_W_Hyman_04272022.plnPowder Day Skiiing, LLC, David A Tarrab Mees Longitudinal Sections 312 W Hyman Ave 312 W Hyman Ave Lots P+Q, Block 46 Aspen CO 81611 USA/ Pitkin County UGB, City of Aspen 312 W Hyman Ave Aspen CO 81611 USA Account # R000145 Parcel ID # 273512464006 Landscape Architect Jennifer M. Dolecki-Smith, RLA Escape Garden Design, LLC Interior Design Travis Terry Travis Terry Design Contractor (At Final) Structural Engineer (As per contractor) Civil Grading and Drainage Boundaries Unlimited (Preliminary) COA- HPO Site Visit08/22/21 Jeffrey H. Woodruff AIA, LEED AP Cloud Hill Design, LLC Snowmass Snowmass CO 81654 USA COA- HPC Conceptual02/26/22 COA- HPC Conceptual04/27/22 ±0" 1 First Floor +9'-3" 2 Second Floor +18'-3" 3 Roof 4 3 2 1 ±0" 1 First Floor +9'-3" 2 Second Floor +18'-3" 3 Roof 4'-4"garden storage bedroom # 2 casework SCALE: 1/4" = 1'-0" 1 Longitudinal at Stairs A301 SCALE: 1/4" = 1'-0" 2 longitudinal at Bedroom #2 and Garden Storage A301 134 SHEET TITLE INTEGRATED DESIGN TEAM PROJECT NO: MODEL FILE: DRAWN BY: COPYRIGHT: SHEET 29 A500 Jeffrey H Woodruff 312_W_Hyman_04272022.pln Project No. 116 /Users/jeffreyw/Documents/Cloud Hill Design/312 W Hyman/312_W_Hyman_04272022.plnPowder Day Skiiing, LLC, David A Tarrab Mees Schedules 312 W Hyman Ave 312 W Hyman Ave Lots P+Q, Block 46 Aspen CO 81611 USA/ Pitkin County UGB, City of Aspen 312 W Hyman Ave Aspen CO 81611 USA Account # R000145 Parcel ID # 273512464006 Landscape Architect Jennifer M. Dolecki-Smith, RLA Escape Garden Design, LLC Interior Design Travis Terry Travis Terry Design Contractor (At Final) Structural Engineer (As per contractor) Civil Grading and Drainage Boundaries Unlimited (Preliminary) COA- HPO Site Visit08/22/21 Jeffrey H. Woodruff AIA, LEED AP Cloud Hill Design, LLC Snowmass Snowmass CO 81654 USA COA- HPC Conceptual02/26/22 COA- HPC Conceptual04/27/22 WINDOW TYPE Fixed Fixed Fixed Fixed Fixed Fixed VIEW DIMENSIONS 1'-0"×1'-0"2'-0"×2'-6"2'-0"×3'-0"2'-0"×4'-0"2'-0"×4'-6"2'-1"×2'-8" NOTES WINDOW LEGEND WINDOW SCHEDULE WINDOW NUMBER ROOM ID W 0N W 0N W 1N W 2E W 3E W 4E W 5E W 6E W 6E W 7E W 7N W 7N W 7N W 8N W 9N W 11E W 12E W 13N W 14E W 15E W 16E W 17N W 18N W 19N ROOM NAME WIDOW SIZE NOMINAL WIDTH 3'-0" 3'-0" 2'-6" 3'-10" 2'-1" 3'-10" 3'-10" 3'-10" 2'-0" 2'-0" 2'-0" 2'-0" 2'-0" 6'-0" 2'-0" 7'-0" 7'-0" 2'-0" 7'-0" 6'-0" 6'-0" 3'-0" 4'-3" 4'-3" NOMINAL HEIGHT 4'-0" 4'-0" 5'-0" 2'-8" 2'-8" 2'-8" 2'-8" 2'-8" 4'-0" 4'-0" 4'-0" 4'-0" 4'-6" 2'-0" 4'-6" 4'-0" 5'-0" 3'-0" 5'-0" 3'-6" 3'-6" 4'-0" 4'-0" 4'-0" TYPE Fixed Fixed Fixed Fixed Fixed Fixed Fixed Fixed Fixed Fixed Fixed Fixed Fixed Fixed Fixed Fixed Fixed Fixed Fixed Fixed Fixed Fixed Fixed Fixed HEAD DETAIL JAMB DETAIL SILL DETAIL ACCESORIES STC U-VALUE .29/.36 .29/.36 .29/.36 Single Single Single Single Single Single .29/.36 .29/.36 .29/.36 .29/.36 .29/.36 .29/.36 Single Single .29/.36 Single Single Single .29/.36 .29/.36 .29/.36 TEMPERED REMARKS SCALE: 1' = 1'-0" 1 Window Legend A500 SCALE: 1' = 1'-0" 2 Window Schedule A500 135 SHEET TITLE INTEGRATED DESIGN TEAM PROJECT NO: MODEL FILE: DRAWN BY: COPYRIGHT: SHEET 30 A501 Jeffrey H Woodruff 312_W_Hyman_04272022.pln Project No. 116 /Users/jeffreyw/Documents/Cloud Hill Design/312 W Hyman/312_W_Hyman_04272022.plnPowder Day Skiiing, LLC, David A Tarrab Mees Schedules 312 W Hyman Ave 312 W Hyman Ave Lots P+Q, Block 46 Aspen CO 81611 USA/ Pitkin County UGB, City of Aspen 312 W Hyman Ave Aspen CO 81611 USA Account # R000145 Parcel ID # 273512464006 Landscape Architect Jennifer M. Dolecki-Smith, RLA Escape Garden Design, LLC Interior Design Travis Terry Travis Terry Design Contractor (At Final) Structural Engineer (As per contractor) Civil Grading and Drainage Boundaries Unlimited (Preliminary) COA- HPO Site Visit08/22/21 Jeffrey H. Woodruff AIA, LEED AP Cloud Hill Design, LLC Snowmass Snowmass CO 81654 USA COA- HPC Conceptual02/26/22 COA- HPC Conceptual04/27/22 TYPE Flush Flush Flush Flush Flush Flush Flush VIEW DIMENSIONS 1'-10"×8'-0"1'-8"×8'-0"2'-0"×8'-0"2'-10"×7'-0"2'-10"×8'-0"2'-2"×8'-0"2'-4"×8'-0" NOTES DOOR LEGEND DOOR SCHEDULE DOOR NUMBER ROOM ID D 0N D 1E D 1N D 1N D 1N D 1N D 2E D 2N D 3E D 3N D 3N D 3N D 4N D 4N D 4N D 5N D 6N D 6N D 7N D 8N D 9N D 9N D 10N D 18N D 18N D 18N D 18N D 19N D 20N D 22E D 23N D 24N D 25N ROOM NAME DOOR LEAF NOMINAL WIDTH 2'-4" 3'-0" 5'-0" 5'-0" 5'-0" 2'-2" 7'-9" 2'-6" 7'-9" 3'-0" 2'-6" 2'-6" 7'-9" 2'-2" 4'-0" 7'-9" 5'-10" 2'-4" 2'-0" 2'-6" 2'-6" 2'-6" 2'-10" 1'-10" 1'-8" 2'-10" 2'-0" 3'-0" 2'-6" 3'-0" 10'-0" 5'-0" 3'-0" NOMINAL HEIGHT 8'-0" 8'-0" 7'-0" 7'-6" 7'-6" 8'-0" 6'-5" 8'-0" 6'-5" 2'-9" 8'-0" 8'-0" 6'-5" 8'-0" 6'-8" 6'-5" 7'-6" 8'-0" 8'-0" 8'-0" 8'-0" 8'-0" 7'-0" 8'-0" 8'-0" 8'-0" 8'-0" 6'-8" 8'-0" 6'-6" 7'-0" 6'-3" 8'-0" LEAF THICKNESS 1 3/4" 1 3/4" 1 3/8" 1 3/8" 1 3/8" 1 3/4" 1 3/4" 1 3/4" 1 3/4" 1 3/4" 1 3/4" 1 3/4" 1 3/4" 1 3/4" 1 3/4" 1 3/4" 1 3/4" 1 3/4" 1 3/4" 1 3/4" 1 3/4" 1 3/4" 1 3/4" 1 3/4" 1 3/4" 1 3/4" 1 3/4" 1 3/4" 1 3/4" 1 3/4" 1 3/4" 1 3/4" 1 3/4" MATERIAL Undefined Undefined Undefined Undefined Undefined Undefined Undefined Undefined Undefined Undefined Undefined Undefined Undefined Undefined Undefined Undefined Undefined Undefined Undefined Undefined Undefined Undefined Undefined Undefined Undefined Undefined Undefined Undefined Undefined Undefined Undefined Undefined Undefined TYPE HEAD DETAIL JAMB DETAIL SILL DETAIL HARD WARE SET ACCESORIES RATINGS FIRE <Undefined> <Undefined> <Undefined> <Undefined> <Undefined> <Undefined> <Undefined> <Undefined> <Undefined> <Undefined> <Undefined> <Undefined> <Undefined> <Undefined> <Undefined> <Undefined> <Undefined> <Undefined> <Undefined> <Undefined> <Undefined> <Undefined> <Undefined> <Undefined> <Undefined> <Undefined> <Undefined> <Undefined> <Undefined> <Undefined> <Undefined> <Undefined> <Undefined> STC REMARKS Width, Matches Width of Exiting/Historic Fenestration/Doors on the South and East facades SCALE: 1' = 1'-0" 1 Door Legend A501 SCALE: 1:0.95 2 Door Schedule A501 136 SHEET TITLE INTEGRATED DESIGN TEAM PROJECT NO: MODEL FILE: DRAWN BY: COPYRIGHT: SHEET 31 A600 Jeffrey H Woodruff 312_W_Hyman_04272022.pln Project No. 116 /Users/jeffreyw/Documents/Cloud Hill Design/312 W Hyman/312_W_Hyman_04272022.plnPowder Day Skiiing, LLC, David A Tarrab Mees Assemblies 312 W Hyman Ave 312 W Hyman Ave Lots P+Q, Block 46 Aspen CO 81611 USA/ Pitkin County UGB, City of Aspen 312 W Hyman Ave Aspen CO 81611 USA Account # R000145 Parcel ID # 273512464006 Landscape Architect Jennifer M. Dolecki-Smith, RLA Escape Garden Design, LLC Interior Design Travis Terry Travis Terry Design Contractor (At Final) Structural Engineer (As per contractor) Civil Grading and Drainage Boundaries Unlimited (Preliminary) COA- HPO Site Visit08/22/21 Jeffrey H. Woodruff AIA, LEED AP Cloud Hill Design, LLC Snowmass Snowmass CO 81654 USA COA- HPC Conceptual02/26/22 COA- HPC Conceptual04/27/22 5/8" GWB 2X6 FRAMING R-21 BATT STRUCTURAL PLY AIR AND VAPOR BARRIER 1 1/2" RIGID INSUL. W/ 1 X FURRING R-5 AIR SPACE WOOD SIDING TOTAL R-VALUE = 26 W1 5/8" GWB 2X6 FRAMING R-21 BATT STRUCTURAL PLY AIR AND VAPOR BARRIER 1 1/2" RIGID INSUL. W/ 1 X FURRING R-5 AIR SPACE STUCCO TOTAL R-VALUE = 26 W2 ● STANDING SEAM MEMBRANE ROOF ● 1/2" DENSDECK ● 1 1/2" POLYISO RIGID INSUL R7.5 ● 3/4" SHEATHING ● WOOD RAFTERS RE: STRUCT ● SPRAY FOAM (7" @ 6.5R/in) R45.5 ● HAT CHANNELS ● WOOD T&G TOTAL R VALUE = R53 COA DEWPOINT CALCULATOR: R Value of Assembly = 55.32 Temp. of Condensing Surface = 68.9 (must be greater than 41 degrees) R1 5/8" GWB 2X6 FRAMING R-21 BATT STRUCTURAL PLY AIR AND VAPOR BARRIER 1 1/2" RIGID INSUL. W/ 1 X FURRING R-5 AIR SPACE STUCCO TOTAL R-VALUE = 26 W3 SLAB ON GRADE ● 2" RIGID INSULATION ● 15 MIL VAPOR RETARDER ● 4" GRAVEL ● UNDISTURBED OR COMPACTED SUBGRADE F1 ● STANDING SEAM METAL ROOF ● 1/2" DENSDECK ● 1 1/2" POLYISO RIGID INSUL R7.5 ● 3/4" SHEATHING ● WOOD RAFTERS RE: STRUCT ● SPRAY FOAM (7" @ 6.5R/in) R45.5 ● HAT CHANNELS ● GWB TOTAL R VALUE = R53 COA DEWPOINT CALCULATOR: R Value of Assembly = 55.32 Temp. of Condensing Surface = 68.9 (must be greater than 41 degrees) R2 ● CARPET AND PAD ● 3/4" PLYWOOD(UNDERLAYMENT GRADE) ● 1X2 SLEEPERS ● 2" RIGID INSULATION ● 15 MIL VAPOR RETARDER ● 4" GRAVEL ● UNDISTURBED OR COMPACTED SUBGRADE F2 5/8" GWB (or two layers Type X for Garage) CMU Block (filled) STRUCTURAL PLY AIR AND VAPOR BARRIER 1 1/2" RIGID INSUL. W/ 1 X FURRING R-5 AIR SPACE STUCCO TOTAL R-VALUE = 26 (tbc) W3 (W3 Garage, 1 Hour Firewall) SCALE: 1" = 1'-0" 1 Assemblies A600 137 SHEET TITLE INTEGRATED DESIGN TEAM PROJECT NO: MODEL FILE: DRAWN BY: COPYRIGHT: SHEET 32 A700 Jeffrey H Woodruff 312_W_Hyman_04272022.pln Project No. 116 /Users/jeffreyw/Documents/Cloud Hill Design/312 W Hyman/312_W_Hyman_04272022.plnPowder Day Skiiing, LLC, David A Tarrab Mees HP HPO Materials 312 W Hyman Ave 312 W Hyman Ave Lots P+Q, Block 46 Aspen CO 81611 USA/ Pitkin County UGB, City of Aspen 312 W Hyman Ave Aspen CO 81611 USA Account # R000145 Parcel ID # 273512464006 Landscape Architect Jennifer M. Dolecki-Smith, RLA Escape Garden Design, LLC Interior Design Travis Terry Travis Terry Design Contractor (At Final) Structural Engineer (As per contractor) Civil Grading and Drainage Boundaries Unlimited (Preliminary) COA- HPO Site Visit08/22/21 Jeffrey H. Woodruff AIA, LEED AP Cloud Hill Design, LLC Snowmass Snowmass CO 81654 USA COA- HPC Conceptual02/26/22 COA- HPC Conceptual04/27/22 Match Existing Green Exterior Cladding (Aluminum, Wood Interior) Existing Exterior Cladding @ Living Level Existing Exterior Cladding @ Eave Existing Exterior Cladding @ Garage Door Existing Exterior Stucco Over CMU @ Main Level Existing Exterior Banister @ Living Level Deck Existing Recycled Decking @ Living Level Deck Match Existing Maroon For Exterior Cladding Replace New Exterior Lighting with Dark Sky Compliant (Down only), Colour TBD Replace Single-Pane Resources with exterior assemblies meeting IECC 2021 or Greater Aluminum Clad, Wood Interior, Divided Light Fenestration Garage, Cedar Siding (Unique, non a historical copy), with exposed concrete at base for moisture protection, Four Candidates to the right Garage, Stucco At Enry (Unique, non a historical copy) DCC Modern Cylinder System Surface, Cord, Stem, Wall Mount Page 12 of 15 © 2022 DMF Lighting. All Rights Reserved. Specifications subject to change without notice. See website for U.S. and international patent information. DMF LIGHTING 1118 E. 223rd St. Carson, CA 90745 323.934.7779 dmflighting.com PHOTOMETRY C0 - C180 C90 - C270cd 1099 lm Values in candela Luminous Intensity Beam Angle: 26° Gamma C 0º 0º3366 5º2967 10º2203 15º1391 20º775 25º419 30º248 35º167 40º119 45º87 50º62 55º43 60º26 65º15 70º7 75º4 80º2 85º1 90º0 Distance from LED Foot Candles Diameter 3’374 1.4' 6’93 2.8' 9’42 4.2' 12’23 5.6' Zone Lumens Luminaire % 0-30 862 78 0-40 971 88 0-60 1078 98 0-90 1098 100 0-180 1099 100 Zonal Lumen Summary Illuminance Chart1600 2400 3200 0°15°30° 45° 60° 75° 90° DC4xxxxD10SPxxxxx30 DCC Fixed, 1000 lm, 3000K, Spot C0 - C180 C90 - C270cd 1132 lm Values in candela Luminous Intensity Beam Angle: 14° Gamma C 0º 0º9823 5º6600 10º2335 15º734 20º357 25º244 30º195 35º159 40º116 45º85 50º61 55º42 60º28 65º16 70º7 75º4 80º2 85º1 90º0 Distance from LED Foot Candles Diameter 3’1091 0.7' 6’273 1.5' 9’121 2.2' 12’68 2.9' Zone Lumens Luminaire % 0-30 906 80 0-40 1004 89 0-60 1110 98 0-90 1131 100 0-180 1132 100 Zonal Lumen Summary Illuminance Chart 4000 6000 8000 0°15°30° 45° 60° 75° 90° DC4xxxxD10NSxxxxx30 DCC Fixed, 1000 lm, 3000K, Narrow Spot Page 13 of 15 © 2022 DMF Lighting. All Rights Reserved. Specifications subject to change without notice. See website for U.S. and international patent information. DMF LIGHTING 1118 E. 223rd St. Carson, CA 90745 323.934.7779 dmflighting.com DCC LED Cylinder Surface, Cord, Stem, Wall Mount PHOTOMETRY C0 - C180 C90 - C270cd 1071 lm Values in candela Luminous Intensity Beam Angle: 55° Gamma C 0º 0º1100 5º1058 10º973 15º866 20º743 25º609 30º478 35º361 40º252 45º161 50º102 55º68 60º41 65º24 70º11 75º6 80º4 85º2 90º0 Zone Lumens Luminaire % 0-30 620 58 0-40 845 79 0-60 1037 97 0-90 1069 100 0-180 1071 100 Zonal Lumen Summary Illuminance Chart DC4xxxxD10WFxxxxx30 DCC Fixed, 1000 lm, 3000K, Wide Flood C0 - C180 C90 - C270cd 1083 lm Values in candela Luminous Intensity Beam Angle: 37° Gamma C 0º 0º1890 5º1792 10º1503 15º1161 20º849 25º589 30º391 35º256 40º162 45º107 50º74 55º51 60º30 65º18 70º8 75º5 80º3 85º1 90º0 Zone Lumens Luminaire % 0-30 760 70 0-40 925 85 0-60 1058 98 0-90 1081 100 0-180 1083 100 Zonal Lumen Summary Illuminance Chart DC4xxxxD10FLxxxxx30 DCC Fixed, 1000 lm, 3000K, Flood Distance from LED Foot Candles Diameter 3’210 2.0' 6’52 4.0' 9’23 6.0' 12’13 8.0' 800 1200 1600 2000 0°15°30° 45° 60° 75° 90° 400 600 800 1000 1200 0°15°30° 45° 60° 75° 90° Distance from LED Foot Candles Diameter 3’122 3.1' 6’31 6.2' 9’14 9.3' 12’8 12.3' COA HP HPO Materials WORKSHEET A700 SCALE: 1' = 1'-0" 2 39.DMF_Downlight A700 SCALE: 1' = 1'-0" 3 39.DMFLighting_DCC_SpecSheet A700SCALE: 1' = 1'-0" 4 39.DMFLighting_DCC_SpecSheet A700 The DMF cylinder in Black or Brown (against the wood, or white against the stucco) would be flush mounted using the existing penetrations, maintaining the existing wall penetrations in the CMU and Stucco. The flood would work well on the Patio Walls, whereas the SouthEast Corner would benefit from a spot (reducing/eliminating) light loss near the property line. Light at the property line < .5 Foot Candles as per code. The existing lighting is a mix of jelly jars and exposed lamps. 138 SHEET TITLE INTEGRATED DESIGN TEAM PROJECT NO: MODEL FILE: DRAWN BY: COPYRIGHT: SHEET 33 A900 Jeffrey H Woodruff 312_W_Hyman_04272022.pln Project No. 116 /Users/jeffreyw/Documents/Cloud Hill Design/312 W Hyman/312_W_Hyman_04272022.plnPowder Day Skiiing, LLC, David A Tarrab Mees Precedent Studies 312 W Hyman Ave 312 W Hyman Ave Lots P+Q, Block 46 Aspen CO 81611 USA/ Pitkin County UGB, City of Aspen 312 W Hyman Ave Aspen CO 81611 USA Account # R000145 Parcel ID # 273512464006 Landscape Architect Jennifer M. Dolecki-Smith, RLA Escape Garden Design, LLC Interior Design Travis Terry Travis Terry Design Contractor (At Final) Structural Engineer (As per contractor) Civil Grading and Drainage Boundaries Unlimited (Preliminary) COA- HPO Site Visit08/22/21 Jeffrey H. Woodruff AIA, LEED AP Cloud Hill Design, LLC Snowmass Snowmass CO 81654 USA COA- HPC Conceptual02/26/22 COA- HPC Conceptual04/27/22 Schubertiade GmbH Austria A900 St Moritz (Bays) A900 Tyrolean_House_Hotel Post A900 Decks and Bays A900 SCALE: 1' = 1'-0" 5 Chalet Precendent A900 SCALE: 1' = 1'-0" 6 No longer a cold roof A900 139 SHEET TITLE INTEGRATED DESIGN TEAM PROJECT NO: MODEL FILE: DRAWN BY: COPYRIGHT: SHEET 34 A901 Jeffrey H Woodruff 312_W_Hyman_04272022.pln Project No. 116 /Users/jeffreyw/Documents/Cloud Hill Design/312 W Hyman/312_W_Hyman_04272022.plnPowder Day Skiiing, LLC, David A Tarrab Mees Restudy Required HPC 1.0 312 W Hyman Ave 312 W Hyman Ave Lots P+Q, Block 46 Aspen CO 81611 USA/ Pitkin County UGB, City of Aspen 312 W Hyman Ave Aspen CO 81611 USA Account # R000145 Parcel ID # 273512464006 Landscape Architect Jennifer M. Dolecki-Smith, RLA Escape Garden Design, LLC Interior Design Travis Terry Travis Terry Design Contractor (At Final) Structural Engineer (As per contractor) Civil Grading and Drainage Boundaries Unlimited (Preliminary) COA- HPO Site Visit08/22/21 Jeffrey H. Woodruff AIA, LEED AP Cloud Hill Design, LLC Snowmass Snowmass CO 81654 USA COA- HPC Conceptual02/26/22 COA- HPC Conceptual04/27/22 SCALE: 1' = 1'-0" 1 312_W_Hyman_08032021 - Picture1 A901 SCALE: 1' = 1'-0" 2 312_W_Hyman_08032021 - Picture3 A901 SCALE: 1' = 1'-0" 3 312_W_Hyman_08032021 - Picture2 A901 SCALE: 1' = 1'-0" 4 312_W_Hyman_08032021 - Picture4 A901 140 SHEET TITLE INTEGRATED DESIGN TEAM PROJECT NO: MODEL FILE: DRAWN BY: COPYRIGHT: SHEET 35 A903 Jeffrey H Woodruff 312_W_Hyman_04272022.pln Project No. 116 /Users/jeffreyw/Documents/Cloud Hill Design/312 W Hyman/312_W_Hyman_04272022.plnPowder Day Skiiing, LLC, David A Tarrab Mees Relationship to Neighborhood 312 W Hyman Ave 312 W Hyman Ave Lots P+Q, Block 46 Aspen CO 81611 USA/ Pitkin County UGB, City of Aspen 312 W Hyman Ave Aspen CO 81611 USA Account # R000145 Parcel ID # 273512464006 Landscape Architect Jennifer M. Dolecki-Smith, RLA Escape Garden Design, LLC Interior Design Travis Terry Travis Terry Design Contractor (At Final) Structural Engineer (As per contractor) Civil Grading and Drainage Boundaries Unlimited (Preliminary) COA- HPO Site Visit08/22/21 Jeffrey H. Woodruff AIA, LEED AP Cloud Hill Design, LLC Snowmass Snowmass CO 81654 USA COA- HPC Conceptual02/26/22 COA- HPC Conceptual04/27/22 SCALE: 1:0.57 1 Birds Eye view of 312 W Hyman A903 141 You have taken the first step to improving the comfort, safety, and efficiency of your home. The following report details the findings from the Home Energy Assessment on February 25, 2022. Call your local Energy Smart Colorado Resource Center with any questions or to discover available rebates that can help make these recommendations a reality. Your utility provider(s): Home Energy Assessment Your Energy Smart Analyst: Charles Cady (970) 379-2961 Woodruff Residence 312 West Hyman, Aspen, CO 81611 Pitkin jeffrey@cloudhilldesign.com (970) 452-9008 Building type: Single Family Year built: 1956 Square footage: 1,536 Primary heating fuel: Natural Gas Number of bedrooms: 3 Number of occupants: 2 Welcome to Energy Smart! Chalet style home in Aspens west end. The owner is planning a renovation with efficiency upgrades in mind. Currently in the planning stage. The assessment was completed as a beginning baseline. Air sealing would be a huge improvement. Assessment overview: 142 Energy Usage Your Energy Smart Analyst: Charles Cady (970) 379-2961 Electric utility provider: City of Aspen Electric Electric account #: 012503656000 Electricity cost per kWh: $0.11 Annual electric usage: 0 kWh Annual electric cost: $0 Gas utility provider: Black Hills Energy Gas account #: 3604100130 Gas cost per Therm: $0.85 Annual gas usage: 0 Therms Annual gas cost: $0 Woodruff Residence 312 West Hyman, Aspen, CO 81611 Pitkin jeffrey@cloudhilldesign.com (970) 452-9008 2143 Recommended Upgrades Your Energy Smart Analyst: Charles Cady (970) 379-2961 When your Analyst performed your Home Energy Assessment, information was collected to estimate annual energy savings on projects you might consider completing to save money on your energy bills. Below is a breakdown of those suggested improvements, the estimated costs and potential annual savings, which were calculated through software modeling. A Savings to Investment Ratio (SIR) of 1 or greater means that the resulting energy savings will pay for the cost of the project. Energy Detail (estimated)Existing Home Improved Home Units Annual energy consumption MMBTU Annual electrical consumption kWh Annual gas consumption THERMS Potential PV system size to offset annual electric usage (estimated)KW Recommended Improvement Estimated Cost Estimated Annual Savings SIR Increase wall insulation to save energy and increase comfort.$0 $84 Replace incandescent lights with CFLs or LEDs to save energy and replacement costs.$5 $5 6.4 Increase attic insulation and coverage to save energy and increase comfort.$1,206 $59 1.0 Insulate your slab to save energy and increase comfort.$2,895 $51 0.4 Add storm windows or install new windows to save energy and increase comfort.$5,571 $89 0.3 114.3 4,001 1,007 2.9 77.3 3,928 639 2.8 3144 Cubic volume: 11,520CF Blower door flow rate: 2,972CFM50 0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1 1.2 Your Home Average Home Tight Home Leaky Home Natural Air Changes per Hour (ACHn) Air Leakage Energy Smart Tip: Your analyst used a blower door fan to test for air leakage. This test helps determine how leaky or tight the home is relative to other homes. Your home’s natural leakage rate is shown in the chart on the left. A very leaky home costs more to heat, while a very tight home may require continuous mechanical ventilation. Leaks can be repaired through attic floor sealing, caulking, weather stripping, and other means. Your Energy Smart Analyst: Charles Cady (970) 379-2961 CF = Cubic Feet. The volume of air contained in a 1’ x 1’ x 1’ cube. CFM50 = Cubic Feet per Minute at 50 Pascals negative pressure. This number estimates how much air your home loses each hour. ACHn = Natural Air Changes per Hour. Expressed in the chart above as 1.05, this means that about 105.00 % of the air in your home is lost to the outside every hour. Infiltration at the upper level door.Infiltration at the sill plate .Blower door set up for the pressure test. Recommendations: Air infiltration observed at exterior doors, attic access, windows and trim, switches, outlets and sill plates. Exterior doors need new weatherstripping to replace the old. The attic access should be weatherstripped to keep out unwanted attic air. Windows and trim should be caulked to seal. Window replacement would be optimum. Switches and outlets can be sealed with gaskets and caulk to reduce infiltration. Sills and baseboards need to be caulked also. Woodruff Residence 312 West Hyman, Aspen, CO 81611 Pitkin jeffrey@cloudhilldesign.com (970) 452-9008 4145 Existing window type: 1-pane, wood/vinyl frame Recommended window type: 2-pane, al. clad/wood, Low-e Square footage (sf) of windows: Front: 60sf Right: 49sf Back: 53sf Left: 24sf Envelope – Windows & Doors Energy Smart Tip: Adding storm windows, insulating blinds or replacing your current windows can save energy and make your home feel more comfortable. When replacing windows, install energy efficient units with a U-factor of .28 or lower and ensure that the rough opening of the window is properly air-sealed with a low-expanding foam that is approved for doors and windows. U-factor – This number refers to the ability of your windows to resist heat loss. It is the numerical reciprocal of R-value. Low-e – These coatings are applied to glass when windows are manufactured and help to reduce the window’s emissivity, which can improve insulating properties when properly applied. Gas filled – Noble gasses are used as an air barrier between panes of glass to help increase a window’s thermal performance. The seals that keep these gasses trapped inside can fail over time and should be inspected periodically. Your Energy Smart Analyst: Charles Cady (970) 379-2961 Single pane window with signs of deterioration . Double pane replacement doors with broken seals. Large expanses of single pane glass . Recommendations: Single pane windows are quite inefficient. Currently the windows have insulating shades and most have plastic window kits. Replacement would be optimum. Woodruff Residence 312 West Hyman, Aspen, CO 81611 Pitkin jeffrey@cloudhilldesign.com (970) 452-9008 5146 Heating & Cooling Energy Smart Tip: Your home’s heating and cooling systems were inspected for safety and efficiency. Older heating systems should be replaced with energy efficient, sealed-combustion units or highly energy efficient heat pumps. This is often a significant upgrade so considerations beyond energy savings should be made. ENERGY STAR certified equipment will provide the best efficiency and savings. AFUE – Annual Fuel Utilization Efficiency is the measure of your heating system’s efficiency. Higher numbers are more energy efficient. SEER – Seasonal Energy Efficiency Ratio is the measure of your cooling system’s efficiency. Higher numbers are more energy efficient. Sealed combustion gas boiler Uninsulated heat pipes Recommendations: All exposed heat pipes should be insulated to reduce heat loss. Your Energy Smart Analyst: Charles Cady (970) 379-2961 Heating system type: Boiler-Baseboard Fuel: Natural Gas Efficiency rating (AFUE): 92 Recommended AFUE: Secondary heating system: Cooling system type: None Efficiency rating (SEER): Recommended SEER: Fireplace type: Wood Woodruff Residence 312 West Hyman, Aspen, CO 81611 Pitkin jeffrey@cloudhilldesign.com (970) 452-9008 6147 Hot water system type: Indirect Fuel: Natural Gas Set temperature: 120 Solar thermal assist: N/A Pipes insulated?: No Existing EF: Recommended EF: Water Heating Energy Smart Tip: Many water heating systems are set to temperatures that are too high for safety and energy efficiency. Keep your water temperature at 120˚F for optimum energy performance and to keep your family safe. EF – Energy Factor is a metric used to compare the energy conversion efficiency of residential appliances and equipment. EF ratings vary by appliance size and type, but in general, bigger numbers are more energy efficient. Sidearm DHW tank with uninsulated pipes . Recommendations: All exposed hot water pipes should be insulated to reduce heat loss. Your Energy Smart Analyst: Charles Cady (970) 379-2961 Woodruff Residence 312 West Hyman, Aspen, CO 81611 Pitkin jeffrey@cloudhilldesign.com (970) 452-9008 7148 Total # of lamps (bulbs): 32 Incandescent or halogen lamps: 1 LED or CFL lamps: 25 Florescent tubes: 6 Refrigerator ENERGY STAR: No kWh usage per year: 583 Second fridge ENERGY STAR: No kWh usage per year: Freezer ENERGY STAR: No kWh usage per year: Dishwasher ENERGY STAR:No Clothes washer ENERGY STAR: Yes Lighting & Appliances Energy Smart Tip: Replace incandescent and CFL lamps with LEDs. LEDs use about 20% of the energy and last up to 25 times longer than traditional incandescent bulbs. They also contain no toxic mercury and turn on instantly. Your refrigerator is usually one of the biggest consumers of electricity in your home. If your fridge is more than 10 years old, consider replacing it with an ENERGY STAR certified unit. Tips to reduce kWh base-load: 1)Use smart power strips for big energy users like home entertainment systems 2)Use laptop computers instead of big towers – they use up to 90% less power 3)Upgrade all of your appliances as they age to ENERGY STAR Your Energy Smart Analyst: Charles Cady (970) 379-2961 Seldom used wood fireplace .Infiltration at a wall outlet.See photo at left. Recommendations: When purchasing appliances choose ENERGY STAR models to reduce energy and water consumption. See air sealing recommendations Woodruff Residence 312 West Hyman, Aspen, CO 81611 Pitkin jeffrey@cloudhilldesign.com (970) 452-9008 8149 Costs, Loans and Rebates The Colorado Residential Energy Upgrade Loan (RENU) loan program is a statewide residential loan program sponsored by the Colorado Energy Office in partnership with Elevations Credit Union. It makes home energy upgrades easy and affordable by offering low-cost, long-term financing for energy efficiency and renewable energy improvements. Direct Installs Your gas utility provider is Black Hills Energy Your electric utility provider is City of Aspen Electric 1. 2. 3.Energy Smart Colorado may also have local rebates available for your community. Click here for more info Your assessment invoice Assessment costs:Partner contributions:Your costs: Base cost $400.00 Electric utility copay $0.00 Your base cost $100.00 Additional costs $0.00 Gas utility copay Additional costs $0.00 Quick Fix total $0.00 Energy Smart incentive $300.00 Additional Quick Fixes $0.00 Program discount $0.00 Assessment total $400.00 Analyst payment $300.00 Your total $100.00 Quick Fix installed Quantity Cost Bath aerators:0 $0.00 DHW blankets:0 $0.00 Kitchen aerators:0 $0.00 LED bulbs:0 $0.00 Pipe wrap:0 $0.00 Showerheads:0 $0.00 Thermostats:0 $0.00 Weatherstripping:0 $0.00 Thermostat setback:0 $0.00 DHW setback:0 $0.00 TOTAL $0.00 QF Annual Savings $$0.00 QF Annual Savings kWh 0 QF Annual Savings Therm 0 The following energy-saving items were installed during the assessment: Click for electric rebatesHyperlink:RESIDENTIAL_ASSESSMENT_ELECTRIC_REBATE_URL:Click for electric rebates}} Click here for gas rebatesHyperlink:RESIDENTIAL_ASSESSMENT_GAS_REBATE_URL:Click here for gas rebates}} Woodruff Residence 312 West Hyman, Aspen, CO 81611 Pitkin jeffrey@cloudhilldesign.com (970) 452-9008 9150 Energy Advising Have Questions? Energy Advisors at your local Energy Smart Colorado Energy Resource Center (ERC) can provide unbiased advice on the next steps toward making your home more comfortable and less costly to operate. They can help you with applicable rebates, incentives, contractors and best practices so you know you’re making educated decisions that are right for your home. Our Energy Advisors are expert consultants who can: •Provide expert advice about energy upgrades •Help you prioritize next steps for your home energy improvements •Connect you with qualified contractors •Assist you with applicable rebates and financing, and help you with the paperwork •Connect you with your utility provider’s incentive programs Heating our homes accounts for the biggest portion of utility bills in our cold climate. Source: U.S. Energy Information Administration, 2015 Residential Energy Consumption Survey. You may receive a call from an Energy Advisor offering to review this assessment with you. We look forward to working with you! Call to speak with an Energy Smart Colorado Energy Advisor: (970) 925-9775 (This is a free service!) How do our homes use energy? We’re here to help! Woodruff Residence 312 West Hyman, Aspen, CO 81611 Pitkin jeffrey@cloudhilldesign.com (970) 452-9008 10151 Your Home Summary Your Energy Smart Analyst: Charles Cady (970) 379-2961 Metric Value Metric Value Metric Value Building Type:Single Family Primary Roof:Unconditioned Attic Combustion Zone Location:Conditioned Space Year Built:1956 Construction:Wood Frame Ambient CO: Square Footage:1,536 Exterior Finish:Composition Shingles Primary Heating Appliance Primary Heating Fuel:Natural Gas Percentage of Total:100%Worst Case Spillage: Number of Bedrooms:3 Existing R-Value:11 Worst Case Flue CO Air Free: Number of Occupants:2 Recommended R-Value:49 Natural Conditions Spillage: Electric Utility Provider:City of Aspen Electric Secondary Roof:Natural Conditions Flue CO Air Free: Account #:012503656000 Construction:Hot Water Heating Appliance Electricity Cost per kWh:$0.11 Exterior Finish:Worst Case Spillage: Annual Electric Usage (kWh):0 Percentage of Total:%Worst Case Flue CO Air Free: Annual Electric Cost:$0 Existing R-Value:Natural Conditions Spillage: Gas Utility Provider:Black Hills Energy Recommended R-Value:Natural Conditions Flue CO Air Free: Account #:3604100130 Existing Window Type:1-pane, wood/vinyl frame Secondary Heating Appliance Gas Cost per Therm:$0.85 Recommended Window Type:2-pane, al. clad/wood, Low-e Worst Case Spillage: Annual Gas Usage (Therms):0 Front Window (sf):60 Worst Case Flue CO Air Free: Annual Gas Cost:$0 Right Window (sf):49 Natural Conditions Spillage: Cubic Volume (cf):11,520 Back Window (sf):53 Natural Conditions Flue CO Air Free: Blower Door Flow Rate (CFM50):2,972 Left Window (sf):24 Total # of Lamps:32 Primary Foundation:Slab on Grade Heating System Type:Boiler-Baseboard Incandescent/Halogen Lamps:1 Percentage of Total:100%Heating System Year Installed:2012 LED or CFLs currently installed:25 Existing R-Value:0 Heating System Fuel:Natural Gas Florescent Tubes:6 Recommended R-Value:21 Efficiency Rating (AFUE):92 Refrigerator ENERGY STAR:No Secondary Foundation:Conditioned Basement Recommended AFUE (or equiv.):Refrigerator kWh Usage per Year (est.):583 Percentage of Total:%Secondary Heating System:Second Fridge ENERGY STAR:No Existing R-Value:11 Cooling System Type:None Second Fridge kWh Usage per Year: Recommended R-Value:21 Efficiency Rating (SEER):Freezer ENERGY STAR:No Primary Wall Construction:Concrete Block Recommended SEER:Freezer kWh Usage per Year (est.): Exterior Finish:Stucco Finish Fireplace Type:Wood Dishwasher ENERGY STAR:No Existing R-Value:3 Hot Water System:Indirect Clothes Washer ENERGY STAR:Yes Recommended R-Value:21 Hot Water System Year Installed:2012 Clothes Dryer ENERGY STAR: Recommended Continuous R-Value:5 Hot Water System Fuel:Natural Gas Clothes Dryer Fuel Source: Secondary Wall Construction:Wood Frame Set Temperature:120 Heat Tape Length (ft): Exterior Finish:Wood Siding Solar Thermal Assist:N/A Heat Tape Estimated kWh per month:0 Existing R-Value:11 Pipes Insulated?:No Hot Tub Capacity: Recommended R-Value:21 Efficiency Rating:Hot Tub Estimated kWh per month:0 Recommended Continuous R-Value:5 Recommended Efficiency:If Electric Baseboard, Length (ft): 152 SHEET TITLE INTEGRATED DESIGN TEAM PROJECT NO: MODEL FILE: DRAWN BY: COPYRIGHT: SHEET 34 Z007 Jeffrey H Woodruff 312_W_Hyman_04082022.pln Project No. 116 /Users/jeffreyw/Documents/Cloud Hill Design/312 W Hyman/312_W_Hyman_04082022.plnPowder Day Skiiing, LLC, David A Tarrab Mees Forestry 312 W Hyman Ave 312 W Hyman Ave Lots P+Q, Block 46 Aspen CO 81611 USA/ Pitkin County UGB, City of Aspen 312 W Hyman Ave Aspen CO 81611 USA Account # R000145 Parcel ID # 273512464006 Landscape Architect (At Final) Contractor Structural Engineer As per contractor Civil Grading and Drainage Boundaries Unlimited (At Final) COA- HPO Site Visit08/22/21 Cloud Hill Design, LLC Snowmass Snowmass CO 81654 USA COA- HPC Conceptual02/26/22 COA- HPC Approval03/23/22 28.5 sq ft 1,196 sq ft12.27'2.62'1.349'307.5 sq ft 32.25 sq ft E EG OS W1 2 3 4 5 678 9 10 1112131415 16790479037902 7901 7901 7901 790179 0 2 7902 790379 0 3 7 9 0 4 Grav e l o f f alley A A B B C C D D E E 4 4 3 3 2 2 1 1 1.55 5 ' 2.40 6 ' 5.00'5'11.6 8 ' 8.167'10.167'10'4.25'9'11.749'19.25'12.27'4.095'307.5 sq ft 32.25 sq ft Proposed fence at the 5' side setback and 5' rear setback, lined on the South with shrubs, see landscaping plan St Moritz R e t a i n i n g w a l l ( e x i s t i n g and under r e h a b i l i t a t i o n ) E EG OS W1 2 3 4 5 678 9 10 1112131415 16790479037902 7901 7901 7901 790179 0 2 7902 790379 0 3 7 9 0 4 Grav e l o f f alley 301.25 sq ft 32 sq ft E EG OS W1 2 3 4 5 678 9 10 1112131415 16790479037902 7901 7901 7901 790179 0 2 7902 790379 0 3 7 9 0 4 Grav e l o f f alley SCALE: 1/16" = 1'-0" 1 First Floor Forestry NW Z007 SCALE: 1/16" = 1'-0" 2 First Floor Forestry NE Z007SCALE: 1/16" = 1'-0" 3 First Floor Forestry Angled Z007 North West Garage/Trash Enclosure Strengths: Aligned with existing site disturbance, the railroad tie retaining wall Leaves the largest open space in the backyard No/little impact to trees #3, #4 and #5 and no impact to Aspens along East property line Does not interfere with existing utilities (maybe gas, but not electric) Benefits to house across alley (north), views to Shadow Mountain Minor negative to St Moritz, but ridge line is 12'-6" and grade steps down 3' grade (from the property line to the NE corner of the garage) and 6' retaining wall, so impact is negligible to St Moritz Distance between the Garage and the Residence is 11', goes to 12' with the 2.5' side setback Keep all trees, gravel between the alley and the garage Distance between the property line and Tree #1 is 15', if the neighboring retaining wall is plum and does not encroach on the West property line. Weaknesses: Minimal impacts to Trees #1 and #2, development, both permeable and hardscape in the Tree #1 drip-line 13' from retaining wall to tree #1 (layout assumes less than 5' setback or additional/variance to combined side setback in R6. If the retaining wall was plum this measurement would be 15' Impact to existing utilities, gas, which runs to the West and South of tree #1 Difficult entry, entry from the East due to grade changes at the alley Drainage Angled Garage/Trash Enclosure Strengths: Protects Tree #1, impact to Tree #2 and likely Tree #3 No/little impact to trees #4 and #5 and no impact to Aspens along East property line Benefits to house across alley (north), views to Shadow Mountain Minor negative to St Moritz, but ridge line is 12'-6" and steps down 3' grade and 6' retaining wall, so impact is extremely negligible to St Moritz Weaknesses: Does not meet residential design standards, not 90 degrees to the alley Reduces usable backyard space, creates unused triangles on the lot Interferes with existing utilities (maybe gas and electric) Distance between the South West Corner of the Garage and the North East corner of the building is less than 5' We create a dead space, unused on the lot of 102 Sq Ft (the North East triangle, goes un-used), so ~2% of the lot space is a void/unusable square footage it creates other impacts- The triangulation of the rectangle- negatively impacts utilities, decreases distance to residence (so it appears like a larger, continuous building on the lot) and fragments the outdoor / back yard continuity (continuous space is interrupted and the yard appears smaller and less occupiable/usable) North East Garage/Trash Enclosure Strengths: Protects Tree #1 and Tree #2 No impact to St Moritz, ridge line is 12'-6" and steps down 3'+ grade and 6' retaining wall, so impact is extremely negligible to St Moritz Weaknesses: Impact to tree #3, tree #4 and #5 and impact to Aspens along East property line Reduces usable backyard space, with garage enjoying a wonderful view to Shadow Mountain Interferes with existing utilities (catv, telephone and electric; impacts to the neighbors to the North and East, concrete pad is for at least four residences/multi-family+) Distance between garage and main residence is 4'-0", does not meet residential design standards for R-6 Zoning 153 SHEET TITLE INTEGRATED DESIGN TEAM PROJECT NO: MODEL FILE: DRAWN BY: COPYRIGHT: SHEET 35 Z008 Jeffrey H Woodruff 312_W_Hyman_04082022.pln Project No. 116 /Users/jeffreyw/Documents/Cloud Hill Design/312 W Hyman/312_W_Hyman_04082022.plnPowder Day Skiiing, LLC, David A Tarrab Mees Forestry Site Coverage 312 W Hyman Ave 312 W Hyman Ave Lots P+Q, Block 46 Aspen CO 81611 USA/ Pitkin County UGB, City of Aspen 312 W Hyman Ave Aspen CO 81611 USA Account # R000145 Parcel ID # 273512464006 Landscape Architect (At Final) Contractor Structural Engineer As per contractor Civil Grading and Drainage Boundaries Unlimited (At Final) COA- HPO Site Visit08/22/21 Cloud Hill Design, LLC Snowmass Snowmass CO 81654 USA COA- HPC Conceptual02/26/22 COA- HPC Approval03/23/22 488.75 sq ft 392.75 sq ft 760.25 sq ft 680.25 sq ft 271.75 sq ft 464.75 sq ft 1,046.5 sq ft 1 2 3 4 5 678 9 10 1112131415 16 Grav e l o f f alley SCALE: 1/8" = 1'-0" 1 First Floor- Tree Z008 Site Total 5,976+- SF Tree Protection Zone/Pervious Space North/East Trees 680.25 Sf East Tree 271.75 SF South State Tree 760.25 SF West Tree 464.75 SF Tree Site Coverage 2,177.00 SF Tree Site % 36.43% Impervious Site Coverage Chalet 1210.75 SF Garage 307.5 SF Enclosure 32.25 SF Build out site 1550.75 Build out site % 25.95% Pervious Open Space North 1064.50 South East 488.75 South West 392.75 Open Space 1,946 Open Space% 32.56% Pavers/skirt ~5.50 % 154 SHEET TITLE INTEGRATED DESIGN TEAM PROJECT NO: MODEL FILE: DRAWN BY: COPYRIGHT: SHEET 36 Z009 Jeffrey H Woodruff 312_W_Hyman_04082022.pln Project No. 116 /Users/jeffreyw/Documents/Cloud Hill Design/312 W Hyman/312_W_Hyman_04082022.plnPowder Day Skiiing, LLC, David A Tarrab Mees Forestry Site Coverage 312 W Hyman Ave 312 W Hyman Ave Lots P+Q, Block 46 Aspen CO 81611 USA/ Pitkin County UGB, City of Aspen 312 W Hyman Ave Aspen CO 81611 USA Account # R000145 Parcel ID # 273512464006 Landscape Architect (At Final) Contractor Structural Engineer As per contractor Civil Grading and Drainage Boundaries Unlimited (At Final) COA- HPO Site Visit08/22/21 Cloud Hill Design, LLC Snowmass Snowmass CO 81654 USA COA- HPC Conceptual02/26/22 COA- HPC Approval03/23/22 1,210.75 sq ft 488.75 sq ft 392.75 sq ft 760.25 sq ft 680.25 sq ft 271.75 sq ft 464.75 sq ft 1,046.5 sq ft 12.27'2.62' 307.5 sq ft 32.25 sq ft E EG OS W1 2 3 4 5 678 9 10 1112131415 16790479037902 7901 7901 7901 790179 0 2 7902 790379 0 3 7 9 0 4 Grav e l o f f alley SCALE: 1/8" = 1'-0" 1 First Floor Forestry NW Z009 North West Garage/Trash Enclosure Strengths: º Aligned with existing site disturbance, the railroad tie retaining wall º Leaves the largest open space in the backyard º No/little impact to trees #3, #4 and #5 and no impact to Aspens along East property line º Does not interfere with existing utilities (maybe gas, but not electric) º Benefits to house across alley (north), views to Shadow Mountain º Minor negative to St Moritz, but ridge line is 12'-6" and grade steps down 3' grade (from the property line to the NE corner of the garage) and 6' retaining wall, so impact is negligible to St Moritz º Distance between the Garage and the Residence is 11', goes to 12' with the 2.5' side setback º Keep all trees, gravel between the alley and the garage º Distance between the property line and Tree #1 is 15'-7", if the neighboring retaining wall is plum and does not encroach on the West property line. Weaknesses: º Minimal impacts to Trees #1 and #2, development, both permeable and hardscape in the Tree #1 drip-line 13' from retaining wall to tree #1 (layout assumes less than 5' setback or additional/variance to combined side setback in R6. If the retaining wall was plum this measurement would be 15' º Impact to existing utilities, gas, which runs to the West and South of tree #1 º Difficult entry, entry from the East due to grade changes at the alley º Drainage 155 HPC Resolution #11, Series of 2022 Page 1 of 3 RESOLUTION #11, SERIES OF 2022 A RESOLUTION OF THE ASPEN HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION (HPC) GRANTING FINAL MAJOR DEVELOPMENT REVIEW FOR THE PROPERTY LOCATED AT 312 W HYMAN AVE BLOCK: 46 LOT: P AND: - LOT: Q, CITY AND TOWNSITE OF ASPEN, COLORADO PARCEL ID: 2735-124-64-006 WHEREAS, the applicant, POWEDERDAYSKIING LLC, represented by Jeffrey Woodruff of Cloud Hill Design LLC, has requested HPC approval for Final Major Development for the property located at 3 1 2 W Hyman, Block: 46 Lot: P AND: Lot: Q, City and Townsite of Aspen, Colorado. As a historic landmark, the site is exempt from Residential Design Standards review; and WHEREAS, Section 26.415.070 of the Municipal Code states that “no building or structure shall be erected, constructed, enlarged, altered, repaired, relocated or improved involving a designated historic property or district until plans or sufficient information have been submitted to the Community Development Director and approved in accordance with the procedures established for their review;” and WHEREAS, for Final Major Development Review, the HPC must review the application, a staff analysis report and the evidence presented at a hearing to determine the project’s conformance with the City of Aspen Historic Preservation Design Guidelines per Section 26.415.070.D.3.b.2 and 3 of the Municipal Code and other applicable Code Sections. The HPC may approve, disapprove, approve with conditions, or continue the application to obtain additional information necessary to make a decision to approve or deny; and WHEREAS, Community Development Department staff reviewed the application for compliance with applicable review standards and recommends approval with conditions; and WHEREAS, HPC reviewed the project on July 27, 2022. HPC considered the application, the staff memo and public comment, and found the proposal consistent with the review standards and granted approval with conditions by a unanimous vote of 7-0. 156 HPC Resolution #11, Series of 2022 Page 2 of 3 NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED: That HPC hereby approves Final Major Development, and Setback Variations for 312 W. Hyman, Block: 46 Lot: P and: - Lot: Q, City and Townsite of Aspen, CO as follows: Section 1: Final Major Development HPC hereby approves Final Major Development with the following conditions: 1. To provide Drainage and Utility Plans with details and the final location of the proposed drain basins, to not conflict with any of the trees propose to maintain, that the drainage design is compliant, and other utilities. 2. To provide Roof Plan with detailed the location of gutters downspouts snow clips, vents, mechanical, and all roof penetrations, etc. 3. To provide a detailed Preservation Plan including documentation of existing conditions and investigation of historic materials. 4. To provide drawings of the chimney at Final Review. Specify final location, height, and all other details related to the chimney, etc. 5. To provide shading at all skylight locations. 6. To provide details on the garage overhangs and window elements. 7. To provide information for all new window layouts and proportions to be reviewed for context and consistency with the existing windows on the main residence. 8. The proposed combined side yard setback variance of 7.5’ is granted for the property for the non- conforming historic asset. Section 2: Material Representations All material representations and commitments made by the Applicant pursuant to the development proposal approvals as herein awarded, whether in public hearing or documentation presented before the Community Development Department, the Historic Preservation Commission, or the Aspen City Council are hereby incorporated in such plan development approvals and the same shall be complied with as if fully set forth herein, unless amended by other specific conditions or an authorized authority. Section 3: Existing Litigation This Resolution shall not affect any existing litigation and shall not operate as an abatement of any action or proceeding now pending under or by virtue of the ordinances repealed or amended as herein provided, and the same shall be conducted and concluded under such prior ordinances. Section 4: Severability If any section, subsection, sentence, clause, phrase, or portion of this Resolution is for any reason held invalid or unconstitutional in a court of competent jurisdiction, such portion shall be deemed a separate, distinct and independent provision and shall not affect the validity of the remaining portions thereof. 157 HPC Resolution #11, Series of 2022 Page 3 of 3 APPROVED BY THE COMMISSION at its regular meeting on the 27th day of July, 2022. Approved as to Form: Approved as to Content: ________________________________ ________________________________ Katharine Johnson, Assistant City Attorney Kara Thompson, Chair ATTEST: ________________________________ Michael Sear, Deputy City Clerk 158 HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION WORK SESSION AGENDA July 27, 2022 1. Review any requests from HP Commissioners 2. New HPC Forms – review current, discuss improvements and future forms 3. Next Work Sessions 159 Historic Preservation Project Project Monitor Review Request Form PERMIT NUMBER: REQUEST NUMBER (Year, Number): PROPERTY ADDRESS: APPLICANT REPRESENTATIVE: CONTACT NUMBER & EMAIL: Written description of request for change: Following Items must be included with this document for Staff & Monitor Review: HPC R esolutions for the project HPC M eeting Minutes for the approval HPC Approved Drawings and Drawings for requested change o Side-by -side elevations, site plan, details, etc. o Clearly marked call-outs on drawings Staff & Monitor Determination: APPROVED HPC BOARD REVIEW _______________ (Staff) & _______________ (Monitor) Determination provided This ___ day of __________ 2022. Disclaimer: Issuance of this approval is specific to the design review and based on the information provided by the applicant. It will be the applicant’s responsibility to update permit information for re-review and approval by all relevant review agencies. 160 PREAPPLICATION SUMMARY CHECKLIST LANGUAGE TEMPLATE: APPLICATION CHECKLIST: Below is a list of submittal requirements for HPC Minor review. Please email the entire application as one pdf to sarah.yoon@cityofaspen.com. The fee will be requested after the application is deemed complete.  Completed Land Use Application and signed Fee Agreement.  Pre -application Conference Summary (this document).  Street address and legal description of the parcel on which development is proposed to occur, consisting of a current (no older than 6 months) certificate from a title insurance company, an ownership and encumbrance report, or attorney licensed to practice in the State of Colorado, listing the names of all owners of the property, and all mortgages, judgments, liens, easements, contracts and agreements affecting the parcel, and demonstrating the owner’s right to apply for the Development Application.  Applicant’s name, address and telephone number in a letter signed by the applicant that states the name, address and telephone number of the representative authorized to act on behalf of the applicant.  HOA Compliance form (Attached).  List of adjacent property owners within 300’ for public hearing.  An 8 1/2” by 11” vicinity map locating the parcel within the City of Aspen.  Site improvement survey showing all existing conditions including topography and vegetation, certified by a registered land surveyor, licensed in the state of Colorado.  A written description of the proposal (scope of work) and written explanation of how the proposed development complies with the review standards and design guidelines relevant to the application.  A proposed site plan showing setbacks and property boundaries.  Preliminary stormwater mitigation plans for the site as it relates to the proposed site improvement.  An accurate representation of all building materials and finishes to be used in the development. Please include relevant cut-sheets for all materials for review.  Supplemental materials to provide a visual description of the context surrounding the designated historic property including photographs and other exhibits, as needed, to accurately depict location and extent of proposed work. 161