Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutagenda.hpc.202208241 AGENDA ASPEN HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION August 24, 2022 4:30 PM, I.ROLL CALL II.MINUTES II.A.Minutes - 8/10/22 minutes.hpc.20220810_DRAFT.docx III.PUBLIC COMMENTS IV.COMMISSIONER MEMBER COMMENTS V.DISCLOSURE OF CONFLICT OF INTEREST VI.PROJECT MONITORING VII.STAFF COMMENTS VIII.CERTIFICATE OF NO NEGATIVE EFFECT ISSUED IX.CALL UP REPORTS X.SUBMIT PUBLIC NOTICE FOR AGENDA ITEMS XI.OLD BUSINESS XII.NEW BUSINESS XII.A.215 E Hallam Minor Review 215 E Hallam_Memo.pdf HPC resolution 215 E Hallam.pdf Exhibit A_Minor Development.pdf Exhibit B1_Application Forms.pdf Exhibit B2_Application Drawings.pdf Exhibit B3_Application FA Calcs.pdf XIII.ADJOURN 1 2 XIV.WORK SESSION XIV.A.Work Session HISTORIC_PRESERVATION_COMMISSION_work_session_08.24.2022.pdf Project_Monitor_FORM_working.pdf XV.NEXT RESOLUTION NUMBER TYPICAL PROCEEDING FORMAT FOR ALL PUBLIC HEARINGS (1 Hour, 10 Minutes for each Major Agenda Item) 1. Declaration of Conflicts of Interest (at beginning of agenda) 2. Presentation of proof of legal notice (at beginning of agenda) 3. Applicant presentation (20 minutes) 4. Board questions and clarifications of applicant (5 minutes) 5. Staff presentation (5 minutes) 6. Board questions and clarifications of staff (5 minutes) 7. Public comments (5 minutes total, or 3 minutes/ person or as determined by the Chair) 8. Close public comment portion of hearing 9. Applicant rebuttal/clarification (5 minutes) 10. Staff rebuttal/clarification (5 minutes) End of fact finding. Chairperson identifies the issues to be discussed. 11. Deliberation by the commission and findings based on criteria commences. No further input from applicant or staff unless invited by the Chair. Staff may ask to be recognized if there is a factual error to be corrected. If the item is to be continued, the Chair may provide a summary of areas to be restudied at their discretion, but the applicant is not to re-start discussion of the case or the board’s direction. (20 minutes) 12. Motion Updated: November 15, 2021 2 REGULAR MEETING HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION AUGUST 10TH, 2022 Ms. Johnson started by pointing out that they Commission did not have a Chair or Vice-Chair at the meeting. She noted that the members present would need to select a Chairperson for the meeting. Mr. Moyer was selected to be Chair. Mr. Moyer opened the regular meeting of the Aspen Historic Preservation Commission at 4:30pm. Commissioners in attendance: Jodi Surfas, Peter Fornell, Roger Moyer, and Sheri Sanzone. Staff present: Natalie Feinberg Lopez, Principal Planner Historic Preservation Sarah Yoon, Historic Preservation Planner Kate Johnson, Assistant City Attorney Mike Sear, Deputy City Clerk Risa Rushmore, Administrative Assistant II MINUTES: Mr. Fornell motioned to approve the minutes from 7/27/22. Mr. Moyer seconded. Roll call vote: Mr. Fornell, yes; Mr. Moyer, yes; Ms. Sanzone, yes; Ms. Surfas, yes; All in favor, motion passes. PUBLIC COMMENTS: None. COMMISSION MEMBER COMMENTS: None DISCLOSURE OF CONFLICTS OF INTEREST: Ms. Sanzone said she was conflicted on the item tonight. She will leave once normal business was complete and before the new business item. PROJECT MONITORING: Ms. Feinberg Lopez noted a staff and monitor issue coming up for Lift 1 Lodge. She would be in contact once a date is set. STAFF COMMENTS: Ms. Feinberg Lopez noted that there was a misprint in the newspaper. 215 E. Hallam – Minor Review - was noticed for this meeting by mistake and has subsequently been noticed for the 8/24 meeting. CERTIFICATE OF NO NEGATIVE EFFECT: None. CALL UP REPORTS: None. SUBMIT PUBLIC NOTICE FOR AGENDA ITEMS: Ms. Johnson said that she reviewed public notice and that notice was provided per the code for the agenda item. Ms. Sanzone left the meeting at 4:35pm NEW BUSINESS: 233 W. Bleeker – Final Major Development, PUBLIC HEARING Applicant Presentation: Sara Adams – Bendon Adams 3 REGULAR MEETING HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION AUGUST 10TH, 2022 Ms. Adams started her presentation by introducing Brandon Architects, Justin Yarnell the civil engineer and Katherine Lam the owner. She then went over a brief history of the property and the conceptual approval granted in February of 2022, that included a“relocation” to dig a basement, demolition of non- historic additions, complete restoration of two landmarks, FAR bonus, and a variance for historic conditions. She then went into the Final review proposals, starting with the landscape plan, including the primary and secondary walkways, planting designs, and pathway lighting. She then went over the stormwater mitigation plans and mentioned that time had been spent with PJ Murray from the City’s Engineering department along with Ms. Yoon on the plans. She pointed out on the landscape plan where the drywell would be located and noted that the drains that connect to the drywell have a sod cover. She also briefly described the proposed fencing on the property. Ms. Adams went on to describe the landscape plans as they relate to the historic carriage house. At the conceptual review, HPC had given direction to work on the restoration efforts on the front façade and come up with a subtle way to express the original function of the building. Using hi-res historical photos, they decided that tire tracks would be the most subtle way to express that it was originally a carriage house. She presented three options for the design of the tire tracks. She noted that there is no curb cut allowed on N. 2nd St. so the tire tracks would never be used. Ms. Adams then described the proposed materials and referenced the update that was sent to commissioners removing the Hardie Plank from the entire project. She went over the proposed materials for both the historic landmark and new addition. Talking about the windows on the project, she noted that all the windows on the historic landmark are to be restored pursuant to the historic photos and the approach for the windows on the addition was to subtly reference the historic landmark in a simple way. She then highlighted the ridge vent details on the whole property. The proposed lighting was then described. Ms. Adams closed by going over the restoration plans to bring the historic landmark back to what it was and said the applicant team was completely amenable to all the conditions of approval that Ms. Yoon has put together but requested that condition #4 be removed because there is no longer Hardie board proposed in the application. Mr. Fornell asked for some clarification of the applicants request to remove condition #4 and also more information about condition #6. Ms. Adams provided an explanation of the removal of condition #4 and went over more details of the ridge vent design from condition #6. Ms. Surfas asked Ms. Adams if they were planning on any snow steps on the roof of the historic landmark as they were a recommendation. Ms. Adams said there are no snow clips proposed on the roof of the historic asset, but there are snow guards proposed for the new addition. They would work with staff and monitor to add them if needed. Mr. Moyer asked what the soffit overhang distance would be on the historic structure. Ms. Adams referred to Brandon Architects to answer that question. Brandon Architects asked for some clarification of Mr. Moyer’s question. Mr. Moyer said that traditionally Victorian structures had ample overhang and this one seems to be minimal. He was wondering what the distance was, if they thought it was sufficient and if it would be unreasonable to ask for a larger overhang. Brandon Architects said both the overhang on the historic asset and new addition would be 18 inches and that they were satisfied that it, along with the drainage plan, would protect the windows and siding. Mr. Moyer was also concerned about the West side of the historic not having a gutter proposed and less of an overhang, combining to potentially causing an issue with falling ice damaging the front porch below. Brandon Architects showed a historic 4 REGULAR MEETING HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION AUGUST 10TH, 2022 photo highlighting that the original overhangs were not that substantial and said they tried to the best of their ability to match those in the proposed design. Mr. Moyer then asked if there was a modern sconce proposed for the front porch of the historic asset. Ms. Adams said that modern sconces are proposed for the whole project. Mr. Moyer said he would question the modern sconce on the historic asset. Staff Presentation:Sarah Yoon – Historic Preservation Planner Ms. Yoon started by showing photos of the current conditions and details of the property. Then she showed the Sanborn map of the lot and a historic photo from 1963 of the structure. She then touched on the pieces of the staff memo. When it comes to the landscape plan, she mentioned that the applicant has worked with city departments on the details of the drainage plan, specifically the drain cover detail and that the cover details are consistent to what has been seen on other projects as a solution to help disguise the grates. She reviewed the options presented for the carriage house path and stated that staff was in favor of option #2. She went on to state that in terms of the overall landscape plan, staff finds that it does meet design guidelines. She said that staff was in support of the changes made to the front façade of the carriage house in response to the conditions of the conceptual approval. She then reviewed the benefits requested, including the west side yard setback reduction of 2 feet and the 500 square foot Floor Area Bonus. Staff finds criteria has been met and is in support of these. Next, she reviewed the staff recommendations for approval, noting that condition #4 is being requested to be removed as staff finds it has been met. Mr. Fornell asked about condition #7, relating to snow stops on the historic resource. He said that with his experience in the development world, after looking at the roof, he was convinced that snow will slide on the roof. He was concerned about the useful life of a gutter where snow slides off the roof. Ms. Surfas asked for a refresher on the details of the side porch. Ms. Yoon reminded her that as part of the discussions at conceptual review the original proposed railings and steps had been removed from the design. The new proposal is to recreate the screened in porch seen in the 1955 image. Mr. Moyer asked Ms. Yoon about the proposed modern light fixture on the front porch of the historic asset. Ms. Yoon responded that when it comes to fixtures on historic resources staff just asks for something simple. PUBLIC COMMENT: None. BOARD DISCUSSION:Mr. Moyer started by addressing the tire tracks at the carriage house and if anyone was opposed to option #2. Mr. Fornell mentioned that he had normally seen HPC require paths for autos where they were going to be functional. He asked if requiring one that would not be functional was standard practice. He said he was satisfied with option #2 but would also be satisfied if there were no tire tracks. Ms. Surfas said she was questioning why they were there if there was no curb cut. She got the point but wondered why they should be there if you were not going to use them. Mr. Moyer said just having them might be an invitation for someone to pull a car up and thought in the landscape plan it may not be necessary. He asked Ms. Yoon for her thoughts. Ms. Yoon said that including the tire tracks was a direction given by HPC at conceptualto try to represent the original usage of the carriage house in a 5 REGULAR MEETING HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION AUGUST 10TH, 2022 subtle way. Ms. Yoon asked for clear direction from the members to either go with option #2 or no tire tracks at all. Mr. Moyer, Mr. Fornell, and Ms. Surfas all were in favor of no tracks. Mr. Moyer then brought up the ridge vent and all members were not opposed to it. All members were ok with the removal of condition #4. MOTION: Mr. Fornell motioned to approve Resolution #12 with the removal of condition #4 and #6. Ms. Surfas seconded. Roll call vote: Mr. Fornell, yes; Mr. Moyer, yes; Ms. Surfas, yes. 3-0, motion passes. Mr. Fornell said he would be the monitor for this project. ADJOURN: Mr. Fornell motioned to adjourn the regular meeting. Mr. Moyer seconded. All in favor; motion passed. ____________________ Mike Sear, Deputy City Clerk 6 Page 1 of 6 427 Rio Grande Pl, Aspen, CO 81611 | P: 970.618.8424 | www.aspen.gov Memorandum TO: Aspen Historic Preservation Commission FROM: Natalie Feinberg Lopez, Principal Planner, Historic Preservation THROUGH: Natalie Feinberg Lopez, Principal Planner, Historic Preservation MEETING DATE: August 24, 2022 RE: 215 E Hallam Street – Minor Development Review, Side yard Setback Variations, PUBLIC HEARING. APPLICANT /OWNER: Philip Jeffreys and Mirte Mallory REPRESENTATIVE: Philip Jeffreys and Mirte Mallory LOCATION: Street Address: 215 E Hallam Street, Aspen, CO Legal Description: 215 E Hallam St, Unit 1, Berko Studio Duplex, City and Townsite of Aspen, Colorado Parcel Identification Number: PID# 2737-073-16-009 CURRENT ZONING & USE R-6 – Medium-Density Residential Single-family home PROPOSED USE: No change SUMMARY: 215 E. Hallam is a 6,000 square foot lot located in the R-6 zone district. The property is landmarked designated and contains a duplex. The applicant has requested a Minor Development review for the construction of a small new basement addition, and a sideyard setback variation. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends approval of this project. Site Locator Map – 215 E Hallam Street 215 7 Page 2 of 6 427 Rio Grande Pl, Aspen, CO 81611 | P: 970.618.8424 | www.aspen.gov BACKGROUND: 215 E. Hallam is a 6,000 square foot lot located in the R-6 zone district. The property is landmarked designated and contains a duplex, one half of which is a mid-century modern home constructed in1964 to be the photography studio of Ferenc Berko. The studio was designed by one of Aspen’s important modern architects, Ted Mularz, completed in the Bauhaus/International style. In 2018, the owners of the duplex completed an extensive remodel and addition as part of the landmarking process, receiving setback variances and numerous AspenModern designation benefits. HPC Resolution #12 2015, HPC Resolution #2 2016, and City Council Ordinance #14 2015 allowed for the historic designation with multiple benefits, including additional floor area and a variation for the setbacks. The result was one of Aspen’s high marks for excellence in historic preservation, creating an important AspenModern landmark, combined with the sustainability features of high density, and the support of a local family to remain living in Aspen with three generations housed on a 6000sf lot. REQUEST OF HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION (HPC) The Applicant is requesting the following land use approvals: • Minor Development (Section 26.415.070.C) for a new basement addition to the historic residence. The Historic Preservation Commission (HPC) is the final review authority. • Setback Variation (Section 26.415.110.C) for the relocated historic outbuilding. The Historic Preservation Commission (HPC) is the final review authority. The HPC is the final review authority, however, this project is subject to Call-up Notice to City Council. PROJECT SUMMARY: The applicant proposes a subgrade addition to the historic unit, which will require Minor Development review by HPC for floor area availability confirmation and appropriateness of the design. Above grade alterations are not required. The final design allows for the basement addition to remain within the allotted floor area designated to the lot by ordinance #14 2015. Resolution #12 HPC granted the project a 5' rear setback, 3' east setback, and an 8' combined sideyard and 4' front yard setback. The proposed basement addition sits within the courtyard created by the historic asset, and the new construction, and within the designated setbacks, it does not allow for the combined sideyard setback of 15 feet, and thus the proposed design requires HPC approval for an 8’ combined sideyard variation that matches the setback for the current duplex configuration. Minor Development and setback variation is a one-step process, requiring the approval of the Historic Preservation Commission by majority vote. 8 Page 3 of 6 427 Rio Grande Pl, Aspen, CO 81611 | P: 970.618.8424 | www.aspen.gov Figure 1 – Existing courtyard. The proposed basement addition is located beneath the grass square of the courtyard. 9 Page 4 of 6 427 Rio Grande Pl, Aspen, CO 81611 | P: 970.618.8424 | www.aspen.gov Figure 2 – The proposed basement addition. 10 Page 5 of 6 427 Rio Grande Pl, Aspen, CO 81611 | P: 970.618.8424 | www.aspen.gov Figure 3 – Plan view of the proposed addition – the new basement is shown in dark orange. STAFF COMMENTS: Staff finds the proposal to add a subgrade basement to the historic portion of the duplex meets the requirements of the Design Guidelines, as the proposed addition poses no harm to the structure and is essentially an invisible addition, as it is not seen from the street, alley, nor by the neighbors. This is a rare project where HPC and staff and not asked to mitigate the detriments to a historic structure with a new addition. In this case, the improvements to the site cause no harm, while improving the usefulness of the historic asset so that it will continue to function. Adaptation is a critical component to design principals, in this project it is combined with preservation best practices. In summary, staff finds the proposal meets the HP Design Guidelines and recommends approval. Setback Variations: A 15’ combined sideyard setback is required for a structure in the R-6 zone district. This project was previously granted an 8’ sideyard setback variation. The proposed project would meet the same requirement, needing an 8’ sideyard setback variation. HPC may grant a setback variation if one of the two criteria is met (Section 26.415.110.C): In granting a variance, the HPC must make a finding that such a variance: a) Is similar to the pattern, features and character of the historic property or district; and/or b) Enhances or mitigates an adverse impact to the historic significance or architectural character of the historic property, an adjoining designated historic property or historic district. 11 Page 6 of 6 427 Rio Grande Pl, Aspen, CO 81611 | P: 970.618.8424 | www.aspen.gov Staff finds the request meets the criteria for granting setback variations as it meets both criteria, as the proposed project makes no changes to the characters of the property or district, and it enhances the historic property while mitigating the possibility for any adverse future impacts to the historic asset as the lot has no additional space for additions. REFERRAL COMMENTS: The application was referred out to other City departments despite Minor Reviews rarely being sent out for comments. The following is a summary of comments received. Building Department: Minor concerns were addressed. Any and all issues may be addressed during building permit process. Zoning Department: All floor area calculations were reviewed multiple times to be certain all issues were addressed. Minor issues were found in the calculations and corrected. While these items are typically addressed during the building permit process, all items were addressed during the land use case review. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends the Historic Preservation Commission approve the proposed project. ATTACHMENTS: Resolution #12, Series of 2019 Exhibit A – Historic Preservation Design Guidelines Criteria Exhibit B – Application 12 HPC Resolution #12, Series of 2022 Page 1 of 2 RESOLUTION #12, SERIES OF 2022 A RESOLUTION OF THE ASPEN HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION GRANTING MINOR DEVELOPMENT APPROVAL FOR THE PROPERTY LOCATED AT 215 EAST HALLAM ST, UNIT 1, BERKO STUDIO DUPLEX, CITY AND TOWNSHIP OF ASPEN, COLORADO PARCEL ID: 2737-073-16-009 WHEREAS, the review is subject to the Municipal Code in place at the time of application completeness on May 20, 2022; WHEREAS, HPC held a public hearing on the project August 24, 2022. HPC considered the application, the staff memo, and public comments, and found the proposal consistent with the review standards and granted approval with conditions by a vote of __ to __. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED: Section 1: Minor Development Review HPC hereby approves Minor Development and Commercial Design Review as follows: 1.Approval is granted regarding the proposed designs to improve the property of 215 E. Hallam with a new basement located below grade in the central courtyard. 2.The development approvals granted herein shall constitute a site-specific development plan vested for a period of three (3) years from the date of issuance of a development order. However, any failure to abide by any of the terms and conditions attendant to this approval shall result in the forfeiture of said vested property rights. Unless otherwise exempted or extended, failure to properly record all plats and agreements required to be recorded, as specified herein, within 180 days of the effective date of the development order shall also result in the forfeiture of said vested property rights and shall render the development order void within the meaning of Section 26.104.050 (Void permits). Zoning that is not part of the approved site-specific development plan shall not result in the creation of a vested property right. No later than fourteen (14) days following final approval of all requisite reviews necessary to obtain a development order as set forth in this Ordinance, the City Clerk shall cause to be published in a newspaper of general circulation within the jurisdictional boundaries of the City of Aspen, a notice advising the general public of the approval of a site specific development plan and creation of a vested property right pursuant to this Title. Such notice shall be substantially in the following form: 13 HPC Resolution #12, Series of 2022 Page 2 of 2 Notice is hereby given to the general public of the approval of a site specific development plan, and the creation of a vested property right, valid for a period of three (3) years, pursuant to the Land Use Code of the City of Aspen and Title 24, Article 68, Colorado Revised Statutes, pertaining to the following described property: 215 E Hallam St. Nothing in this approval shall exempt the development order from subsequent reviews and approvals required by this approval of the general rules, regulations and ordinances or the City of Aspen provided that such reviews and approvals are not inconsistent with this approval. The approval granted hereby shall be subject to all rights of referendum and judicial review; the period of time permitted by law for the exercise of such rights shall not begin to run until the date of publication of the notice of final development approval as required under Section 26.304.070(A). The rights of referendum shall be limited as set forth in the Colorado Constitution and the Aspen Home Rule Charter. Section 2: Material Representations All material representations and commitments made by the Applicant pursuant to the development proposal approvals as herein awarded, whether in public hearing or documentation presented before the Community Development Department, the Historic Preservation Commission, or the Aspen City Council are hereby incorporated in such plan development approvals and the same shall be complied with as if fully set forth herein, unless amended by other specific conditions or an authorized authority. Section 3: Existing Litigation This Resolution shall not affect any existing litigation and shall not operate as an abatement of any action or proceeding now pending under or by virtue of the ordinances repealed or amended as herein provided, and the same shall be conducted and concluded under such prior ordinances. Section 4: Severability If any section, subsection, sentence, clause, phrase, or portion of this Resolution is for any reason held invalid or unconstitutional in a court of competent jurisdiction, such portion shall be deemed a separate, distinct and independent provision and shall not affect the validity of the remaining portions thereof. APPROVED BY THE COMMISSION at its regular meeting on the 24th day of August 2022. Approved as to Content: ________________________________ Kara Thompson, Chair Approved as to Form: _ ________________________________ Kate Johnson, Assistant City Attorney ATTEST: _______________________ Michael Sear, Deputy City Clerk 14 Page 1 of 5 Exhibit A Historic Preservation Design Guidelines Criteria 26.415.70 No building, structure or landscape shall be erected, constructed, enlarged, altered, repaired, relocated or improved involving a designated historic property or a property located within a Historic District until plans or sufficient information have been submitted to the Community Development Director and approved in accordance with the procedures established for their review. An application for a building permit cannot be submitted without a development order. 26.415.70.C. Certificate of appropriateness for a minor development. 3. The procedures for the review of minor development projects are as follows: a) The Community Development Director will review the application materials and if they are determined to be complete, schedule a public hearing before the HPC. The subject property shall be posted pursuant to Paragraph 26.304.060.E.3.b. b) Staff shall review the submittal material and prepare a report that analyzes the project's conformance with the design guidelines and other applicable Land Use Code sections. This report will be transmitted to the HPC with relevant information on the proposed project and a recommendation to approve, disapprove or approve with conditions and the reasons for the recommendation. The HPC will review the application, the report and the evidence presented at the hearing to determine the project's conformance with the City Historic Preservation Design Guidelines. c) The HPC shall approve, disapprove, approve with conditions or continue the application to obtain additional information necessary to make a decision to approve or deny. If the application is approved, the HPC shall issue a certificate of appropriateness and the Community Development Director shall issue a development order. d) The HPC decision shall be final unless appealed by the applicant or a landowner within three hundred (300) feet of the subject property in accordance with the procedures set forth in Chapter 26.316. Relevant Historic Preservation Design Guidelines: 15 Page 2 of 5 Staff finds that the Commercial Design Guidelines are met. Chapter 1: Site Planning & Landscape Design MET NOT MET DOES NOT APPLY 1.1 All projects shall respect the historic development pattern or context of the block, neighborhood or district. 1.5 Maintain the historic hierarchy of spaces. 1.7 Provide positive open space within a project site. 1.8 Consider stormwater quality needs early in the design process. 1.9 Landscape development on AspenModern landmarks shall be addressed on a case by case basis. 1.22 When a new retaining wall is necessary, its height and visibility should be minimized. Chapter 2: Rehabilitation - Building Materials MET NOT MET DOES NOT APPLY 2.1 Preserve original building materials. 2.2 The finish of materials should be as it would have existed historically. Chapter 6: Rehabilitation - Architectural Details MET NOT MET DOES NOT APPLY 6.1 Preserve significant architectural features. Chapter 9: New Construction - Excavation, Building Relocation & Foundations MET NOT MET DOES NOT APPLY 9.1 Developing a basement by underpinning and excavating while the historic structure remains in place may help to preserve the historic fabric. 9.6 Minimize the visual impact of lightwells. 9.7 All relocations of designated structures shall be performed by contractors who specialize in moving historic buildings, or can document adequate experience in successfully relocating such buildings. 9.8 Proposals to relocate a building to a new site are highly discouraged Chapter 10: New Construction - Building Additions MET NOT MET DOES NOT APPLY 10.4 The historic resource is to be the focus of the property, the entry point, and the predominant structure as viewed from the street. 10.8 Design an addition to be compatible in size and scale with the main building. 10.12 Design an addition to a historic structure that does not destroy or obscure historically important architectural features. MET MET MET MET MET MET MET Historic Preservation Design Guidelines Review Criteria for 215 E Hallam The applicant is requesting a Minor Development reivew for the construction of a new below grade addition. The proposed design must meet applicable Historic Preservation Design Guidelines. MET MET MET MET MET MET MET MET MET 16 Page 3 of 5 17 City of Aspen Community Development Department Aspen Historic Preservation Land Use Packet City of Aspen | 130 S. Galena Street. | (970) 920 5090 Historic Land Use Application Requirements, Updated: March, 2021 Attached is a Development Application for properties listed on the “Aspen Inventory of Historic Sites and Structures” or properties within Aspen’s Historic Districts. Included in this package are the following attachments: 1. Development Application Fee Policy, Fee Schedule, and Agreement for Payment Form 2. Land Use Application Form 3. Submittal Requirements 4. Summary of the Application Process 5. Matrix of Land Use Application Requirements/ Submittal Requirements Key 6. Public Hearing Notice Requirements 7. Affidavit of Notice All applications are reviewed based on the criteria established in the Aspen Municipal Code and “The City of Aspen Historic Preservation Design Guidelines,” both are available on the web at https://library.municode.com/co/aspen/codes/municipal_code under “Title 26” and www.cityofaspen.com, respectively.  A CERTIFICATE OF NO NEGATIVE EFFECT may be issued for minor work that does not materially change the historic character of the property or district, and the proposed work is clearly within the adopted design guidelines.  A CERTIFICATE OF APPROPRIATENESS must be applied for if the proposed work will make a material changes that alter, diminish, eliminate or effect the historic or architectural character of the property or district in any way. We strongly encourage all applicants to hold a pre-application conference with a Planner in the Community Development Department so that any questions regarding the requirements for submitting a complete application, and the review process, can be addressed. A Preliminary consultation with the Zoning Officer and Building Department is also required in order to determine code compliance and to avoid changes to projects after the review process. 18 City of Aspen Community Development Department Aspen Historic Preservation Land Use Packet City of Aspen | 130 S. Galena Street. | (970) 920 5090 Historic Land Use Application Requirements, Updated: March, 2021 Land Use Review Fee Policy The City of Aspen has established a review fee policy for the processing of land use applications. A flat fee or deposit is collected for land use applications based on the type of application submitted. A flat fee is collected by Community Development for applications which normally take a minimal and predictable amount of staff time to process. Review fees for other City Departments reviewing the application (referral departments) will also be collected when necessary. Flat fees are cumulative – meaning an application with multiple flat fees must be pay the sum of those flat fee. Flat fees are not refundable. A review fee deposit is collected by Community Development when more extensive staff time is required. Actual staff time spent will be charged against the deposit. Various City staff may also charge their time spent on the case in addition to the case planner. Deposit amount may be reduces if, in the opinion of the Community Development Director, the project is expected to take significantly less time to process than the deposit indicates. A determination on the deposit amount shall be made during the pre-application conference by the case planner. Hourly billing shall still apply. All applications must include an Agreement to Pay Application Fees. One payment including the deposit for Planning and referral agency fees must be submitted with each land use application, made payable to the City of Aspen. Applications will not be accepted for processing without the required fee. The Community Development Department shall keep an accurate record of the actual time required for the processing of a land use application requiring a deposit. The City can provide a summary report of fees due at the applicant’s request. The applicant will be billed for the additional costs incurred by the City when the processing of an application by the Community Development Department takes more time or expense than is covered by the deposit. Any direct costs attributable to a project review shall be billed to the applicant with no additional administrative charge. In the event the processing of an application takes less time than provided for by the deposit, the department shall refund the unused portion of the deposited fee to the applicant. Fees shall be due regardless of whether an applicant receives approval. Unless otherwise combined by the Director for simplicity of billing, all applications for conceptual, final and recordation of approval documents shall be handled as individual cases for the purpose of billing. Upon conceptual approval all billing shall be reconciled and past due invoices shall be paid prior to the Director accepting an application for final review. Final review shall require a new deposit at the rate in effect at the time of final submission. Upon final approval all billing shall be again reconciled prior to the Director accepting an application for review of technical documents for recordation. The Community Development Director may cease processing of a land use application for which an unpaid invoice is 30 or more days past due. Unpaid invoices of 90 days or more past due may be assessed a late fee of 1.75% per month. An unpaid invoice of 120 days or more may be subject to additional actions as may be assigned by the Municipal Court Judge. All payment information is public domain. All invoices shall be paid prior to issuance of a Development Order or recordation of development agreements and plats. The City will not accept a building permit for a property until all invoices are paid in full. For permits already accepted, and unpaid invoice of 90 days or more days may result in cessation of building permit processing or issuance of a stop work order until full payment is made. The property owner of record is the party responsible for payment of all costs associated with a land use application for the property. Any secondary agreement between a property owner and an applicant representing the owner (e.g. a contract purchaser) regarding payment of fees is solely between those private parties. 19 City of Aspen Community Development Department Aspen Historic Preservation Land Use Packet City of Aspen | 130 S. Galena Street. | (970) 920 5090 Historic Land Use Application Requirements, Updated: March, 2021 City Use: Fees Due: $ Received $ Agreement to Pay Application Fees An agreement between the City of Aspen (“City”) and Property Phone No.: Owner (“I”): Email: Address of Billing Property: Address: (Subject of (send bills here) application) I understand that the City has adopted, via Ordinance No., Series of 2011, review fees for Land Use applications and payment of these fees is a condition precedent to determining application completeness. I understand that as the property owner that I am responsible for paying all fees for this development application. For flat fees and referral fees: I agree to pay the following fees for the services indicated. I understand that these flat fees are non-refundable. $ flat fee for $ flat fee for $ flat fee for $ flat fee for For Deposit cases only: The City and I understand that because of the size, nature or scope of the proposed project, it is not possible at this time to know the full extent or total costs involved in processing the application. I understand that additional costs over and above the deposit may accrue. I understand and agree that it is impracticable for City staff to complete processing, review and presentation of sufficient information to enable legally required findings to be made for project consideration, unless invoices are paid in full. The City and I understand and agree that invoices mailed by the City to the above listed billing address and not returned to the City shall be considered by the City as being received by me. I agree to remit payment within 30 days of presentation of an invoice by the City for such services. I have read, understood, and agree to the Land Use Review Fee Policy including consequences for no-payment. I agree to pay the following initial deposit amounts for the specified hours of staff time. I understand that payment of a deposit does not render and application complete or compliant with approval criteria. If actual recorded costs exceed the initial deposit, I agree to pay additional monthly billings to the City to reimburse the City for the processing of my application at the hourly rates hereinafter stated. $ deposit for hours of Community Development Department staff time. Additional time above the deposit amount will be billed at $325.00 per hour. $ deposit for hours of Engineering Department staff time. Additional time above the deposit amount will be billed at $325.00 per hour. City of Aspen: Signature: Phillip Supino, AICP Community Development Director Name: Title: 41300 Philip Jeffreys / Mirte Mallory 970.379.7950 philipjeffreys@gmail.com 215 E. Hallam St. Aspen, CO 8161 215 E. Hallam St. Aspen, CO 81611 Philip Jeffreys Owner 05.11.2022 20 City of Aspen Community Development Department Aspen Historic Preservation Land Use Packet City of Aspen | 130 S. Galena Street. | (970) 920 5090 Historic Land Use Application Requirements, Updated: March, 2020 ATTACHMENT 2 - Historic Preservation Land Use Application PROJECT: APPLICANT: Name: Address: Phone #: Fax#: E-mail: REPRESENTATIVE: Name: Address: Phone #: Fax#: E-mail: TYPE OF APPLICATION: (please check all that apply): EXISTING CONDITIONS: (description of existing buildings, uses, previous approvals, etc.) PROPOSAL: (description of proposed buildings, uses, modifications, etc.) Name: Location: (Indicate street address, lot & block number or metes and bounds description of property) Parcel ID # (REQUIRED)  Historic Designation Certificate of No Negative Effect Certificate of Appropriateness  Minor Historic Development  Major Historic Development Conceptual Historic Development Final Historic Development  Relocation (temporary, on or off-site)  Demolition (total demolition)  Substantial Amendment  Historic Landmark Lot Split Berko Studio: Addition 215 E. Hallam St Aspen, CO 81611 273707316009 Philip Jeffreys 215 E. Hallam St - Aspen, CO 81611 970.379.7950 philipjeffreys@gmail.com none Residential- duplex HPC Resolution #12 2015 / HPC Resolution #2 2016 / City Council Ordinance #14 2015 Retain our home's historic architecture and improve its functionality for us as a local, working, year-round family by adding a sub-grade bedroom, office, and storage 21 City of Aspen Community Development Department Aspen Historic Preservation Land Use Packet City of Aspen | 130 S. Galena Street. | (970) 920 5090 Historic Land Use Application Requirements, Updated: March, 2020 General Information Please check the appropriate boxes below and submit this page along with your application. This information will help us review your plans and, if necessary, coordinate with other agencies that may be involved. YES NO   Does the work you are planning include exterior work; including additions, demolitions, new construction, remodeling, rehabilitation or restoration?   Does the work you are planning include interior work, including remodeling, rehabilitation, or restoration?   Do you plan other future changes or improvements that could be reviewed at this time?   In addition to City of Aspen approval for a Certificate of Appropriateness or No Negative Effect and a building permit, are you seeking to meet the Secretary of the Interior’s Standards for Rehabilitation or restoration of a National Register of Historic Places Property in order to qualify for state or federal tax credits?   If yes, are you seeking federal rehabilitation investment tax credits in Conjunction with this project? (Only income producing properties listed on the National Register are eligible. Owner-occupied residential properties are not.)   If yes, are you seeking the Colorado State Income Tax Credit for Historical Preservation? Please check all City of Aspen Historic Preservation Benefits which you plan to use:  Rehabilitation Loan Fund  Dimensional Variances  Tax Credits  Increased Density  Conservation Easement Program  Waiver of Park Dedication Fees  Conditional Uses  Historic Landmark Lot Split 22 City of Aspen Community Development Department Aspen Historic Preservation Land Use Packet City of Aspen | 130 S. Galena Street. | (970) 920 5090 Historic Land Use Application Requirements, Updated: March, 2020 ATTACHMENT 3 - Dimensional Requirements Form (Item #10 on the submittal requirements key. Not necessary for all projects.) Project: Applicant: Project Location: Zone District: Lot Size: Lot Area: (For the purposes of calculating Floor Area, Lot Area may be reduced for areas within the high-water mark, easements, and steep slopes. Please refer to the definition of Lot Area in the Municipal Code.) Commercial net leasable: Existing: Proposed: Number of residential units: Existing: Proposed: _______________________________ Proposed % of demolition: ____________________________________% DIMENSIONS: (write N/A where no requirement exists in the zone district) Floor Area: Height Existing: Allowable: Proposed: Principal Bldg.: Existing: Allowable: Proposed: Accessory Bldg.: Existing: Allowable: Proposed: On-Site parking: Existing: Required: Proposed: % Site coverage: Existing: Required: Proposed: % Open Space: Existing: Required: Proposed: Front Setback: Existing: Required: Proposed: Rear Setback: Existing: Required: Proposed: Combined Front/Rear: Indicate N, S, E, W Existing: Required: Proposed: _______________ Side Setback: Existing: Required: Proposed: Side Setback: Existing: Required: Proposed: Combined Sides: Existing: Required: Proposed: Distance between buildings Existing: Required: Proposed: Existing non-conformities or encroachments and note if encroachment licenses have been issued: Variations requested (identify the exact variances needed): Berko Studio: Addition Philip Jeffreys / Mirte Mallory 215 E. Hallam St Aspen, CO 81611 R-6 6,000sf 6,000sf n/a 2 2 0 4099 4100 4100 No change No change No change No change No change No change No change No change No change Proposed addition is requesting a 10' In resolution #12 HPC granted project a 5' rear setback, 3' east setback, and an 8' combined sideyard and 4' front yard setback E W 3'5' 5' 8'15' no change 10' - - combined yard setback. 23 City of Aspen Community Development Department Aspen Historic Preservation Land Use Packet City of Aspen | 130 S. Galena Street. | (970) 920 5090 Historic Land Use Application Requirements, Updated: March, 2020 Matrix of the City of Aspen’s Historic Preservation Land Use Application Requirements To review full procedures for all applications, reference 26.415 of the City of Aspen building code, Historic Preservation Ordinance. When submitting multiple step applications, do not replicate submission materials. Two copies of the application are required for a Certificate of No Negative Effect, 15 copies are required for each meeting. Also note that an electronic version of all text documents is required. Type of Review Application Requirements Fees Deposit Fee Notice Requirements Designation 1-9, 11,12 $0 Publication, Posting and Mailing Pursuant to Sections: 26.304.060 (E) (3) (a) (b) (c.) at HPC and Council Exempt Development Consult with Historic Preservation Officer to confirm exempt status $0 None Certificate of No Negative Effect 1-9, 15, 17 $245 None Minor Development 1-10, 15, 16, 17, 36 $735 Posting Pursuant to Sections: 26.304.060 (E) (3) (b) Major Development/Conceptual 1-10, 14, 17, 18, 19, 20 Development under 1,000 sf, $1,470 Development over 1,000 sf, $2,940 Publication, Posting and Mailing Pursuant to Sections: 26.304.060 (E) (3) (a) (b) (c.) Major Development/Final 1-10, 16, 21, 22, 36 Paid at time of conceptual Publication, Posting and Mailing Pursuant to Sections: 26.304.060 (E) (3) (a) (b) (c.) Substantial Amendment 1-10, 16, 23, 24, 25, 36 $735 Publication, Posting and Mailing Pursuant to Sections: 26.304.060 (E) (3) (a) (b) (c.) Demolition 1-9, 26 $2,940 Publication, Posting and Mailing Pursuant to Sections: 26.304.060 (E) (3) (a) (b) (c.) Relocation 1-9, 27-34 $2,940 Publication, Posting and Mailing Pursuant to Sections: 26.304.060 (E) (3) (a) (b) (c.) Historic Landmark Lot Split 1-10 $1,470 Publication, Posting and Mailing Pursuant to Sections: 26.304.060 (E) (3) (a) (b) (c.) at HPC and Council Rescinding Designation 1-9, 35 $1,470 Publication, Posting and Mailing Pursuant to Sections: 26.304.060 (E) (3) (a) (b) (c.) at HPC and Council 24 City of Aspen Community Development Department Aspen Historic Preservation Land Use Packet City of Aspen | 130 S. Galena Street. | (970) 920 5090 Historic Land Use Application Requirements, Updated: March, 2020 KEY 1. Contained within a letter signed by the applicant, the applicant's name, address and telephone number, and the name, address, and telephone number of any representative authorized to act on behalf of the applicant. 2. The street address, legal description, and parcel identification number of the property proposed for development. 3. A disclosure of ownership of the parcel proposed for development, consisting of a current certificate from a Title insurance company, or attorney licensed to practice in the State of Colorado, listing the names of all owners of the property, and all mortgages, judgments, liens, easements, contracts and agreements affecting the parcel, and demonstrating the owner's right to apply for the Development Application. 4. An 8 1/2" x 11" vicinity map locating the subject parcel within the City of Aspen. 5. A site plan depicting the proposed layout and the project’s physical relationship to the land and its surroundings. 6. A site improvement survey certified by a registered land surveyor, licensed in the State of Colorado, showing the current status of the parcel including the current topography and vegetation. (This requirement, or any part thereof, may be waived by the Community Development Director if the project is determined not to warrant a survey document.) 7. A written description of the proposal and a written explanation of how the proposed development complies with the review criteria and The City of Aspen Historic Preservation Design Guidelines relevant to the development application. 8. Additional materials, documentation, or reports as deemed necessary by the Community Development Director. 9. Completed Land Use Application Form, Signed Fee Agreement, and Fee. 10. Dimensional Requirement Form. Site or historic district boundary map. 11. Property or district description including narrative text, photographs and/or other graphic materials that document its physical characteristics. 12. Identification of the character-defining features that distinguish the entity which should be preserved. 13. Verification that the proposal complies with Section 26.410, Residential Design Standards, or a written request for a variance from any standard that is not being met. 14. Photographs, building material samples and other exhibits, as needed, to accurately depict location, extent and design of the proposed work. 15. An accurate representation of all major building materials and finishes to be used in the development, depicted through samples or photographs. 16. Scaled elevations and/or drawings of the proposed work and its relationship to the designated historic buildings, structures, sites and features in its context. 17. Scaled drawings of the proposed structure(s) or addition(s) depicting their form, including their height, massing, scale, proportions and roof plan; and the primary features of all elevations in the neighborhood context. 18. Supplemental materials to provide a visual description of the context surrounding the designated historic property or historic district including at least one (1) of the following: diagrams, maps, photographs, 3- D model (digital or physical) or streetscape elevations. 19. Preliminary selection of primary building materials to be used in construction represented by samples and/or photographs. 20. A statement, including narrative text or graphics, indicating how the Final Development Plan conforms to representations made or stipulations placed as a condition of the approval of the Conceptual Development Plan. 21. Final drawings of all proposed structures(s) and/or addition(s) included as part of the development at ¼” = 1.0’ scale 22. A revised site plan 23. Revised scaled elevations and drawings 24. Photographs and other exhibits to illustrate the proposed changes. 25. Written documentation that the Chief Building Official has determined the building an imminent hazard, or narrative 26. text, graphic illustrations or other exhibits that provide evidence that the building, structure or object is of no historic or architectural value or importance. 27. A written description and/or graphic illustrations of the building, structure or object proposed for relocation. 28. A written explanation of the type of relocation requested (temporary, on-site or off-site) and justification for the need for relocation. 29. A written report from a licensed engineer or architect regarding the soundness of the building, structure or object, its ability to withstand the physical move and its rehabilitation needs, once relocated. 30. A conceptual plan for the receiving site providing preliminary information on the property boundaries, existing improvements and site characteristics and the associated planned improvements. 31. Evidence of the financial ability to undertake the safe relocation, preservation and repair of the building, structure or object; site preparation and construction of necessary infrastructure through the posting of bonds or other financial measures deemed appropriate. 32. Supplementary materials to provide an understanding of the larger context for the relocated property and its impact on adjacent properties, the neighborhood or streetscape. 33. If the applicant does not own the receiving site, proof from the site’s property owner of the willingness to accept the relocated building, structure or object. 34. Evidence that the applicant has or is seeking the necessary approvals to place the building on the identified receiving site. If the site is outside of the city limits, verification that the building will be preserved on its new site through a formal action of the other jurisdiction or a preservation easement. 35. A written description of how the property does not meet these criteria for designation. 36. A lighting plan indicating the location of all exterior light fixtures and site lighting, and cut sheets for each type of fixture proposed. Light fixtures must comply with the "City of Aspen Historic Preservation Design Guidelines" and meet the City Lighting Code. 25 City of Aspen Community Development Department Aspen Historic Preservation Land Use Packet City of Aspen | 130 S. Galena Street. | (970) 920 5090 Historic Land Use Application Requirements, Updated: March, ATTACHMENT 4 - General Summary of Historic Preservation Review Process (Please see Section 26.415 of the Aspen Municipal Code for more detailed information) 1. An application is first transmitted to the Community Development Director to determine if it is complete. A complete application for a Certificate of No Negative Effect may be approved by the Community Development Director with no further review if it meets the requirements set forth for that type of work in the Aspen Municipal Code. 2. For all other types of reviews, the applicant shall be notified in writing whether the information is complete or if additional materials are required. 3. A date for a public hearing on a complete application will be scheduled before the HPC. Notice of the hearing shall be provided as required in the Aspen Municipal Code. 4. City Community Development Staff will review the submittal material and prepare a report that analyzes the project’s conformance with the design guidelines and other applicable Land Use Code sections. This report will be transmitted to the HPC with relevant information on the proposed project and a recommendation to approve, disapprove or approve with conditions and the reasons for the recommendation. 5. The HPC will review the application, the report and the evidence presented at the hearing to determine the project’s conformance with the City of Aspen Historic Preservation Design Guidelines. The order of proceedings at the HPC meeting are as follows: 1. Applicant and public are sworn in 2. Staff presentation 3. Commission member questions 4. Public comment 5. Commission member comments 6. Applicant response/clarification 7. Commission motion and vote 6. The HPC will approve, disapprove, approve with conditions or continue the application to obtain additional information necessary to make a decision to approve or deny. If the application is a one- step review, and it is approved, the HPC will issue a Certificate of Appropriateness and the Community Development Director will issue a Development Order. If the application requires submittal for a final review, materials must be prepared and submitted according to the processes described above. A project that receives final approval will be issued a Certificate of Appropriateness and the Community Development Director will issue a Development Order. 7. HPC decisions are final unless appealed by the applicant or a landowner within three hundred (300) feet of the subject property, as provided in the Aspen Municipal Code. For Major Development, Demolition, or Relocation, a resolution of the HPC action will be forwarded to the City Council to allow them an opportunity to “call up” the decision if they feel there has been an abuse of discretion or denial of due process. No building permit can be issued for construction of the project until the thirty (30) day “call up” period has expired. 26 City of Aspen Community Development Department Aspen Historic Preservation Land Use Packet City of Aspen | 130 S. Galena Street. | (970) 920 5090 Historic Land Use Application Requirements, Updated: March, 8. For Historic Designation and Historic Landmark Lot Split, the two types of historic preservation reviews in which City Council makes the final determination, staff will prepare a report including the recommendation of the HPC, and a hearing will be scheduled before Council. Council will evaluate the application to determine if the review criteria are met. The Council may approve, disapprove or continue the application to request additional information necessary to make a decision to approve or deny. 9. HPC assigns a member of the Commission to be the “project monitor” for each project they approve. The monitor (and Staff) may periodically visit the site as work is under construction. If the applicant requests a change to any aspects of the project change after the HPC approval, the applicant, Staff, and the project monitor will attempt to address them without returning to the full HPC. 10. Before an application for a building permit can be submitted, a final set of plans reflecting any or all required changes by the HPC or City Council must be on file with the City. Any conditions of approval or outstanding issues which must be addressed in the field or at a later time shall be noted on the plans. 11. Once a Development Order has been received, a building permit application may be submitted. At this time the proposal will be reviewed for compliance with the Uniform Building Code and zoning regulations. Fees for water, sewer, park dedication fees, and employee housing will be collected if due. Any document, such as a plat, deed restriction, or other agreement which is required to be filed, must be recorded before the building permit will be issued. 27 City of Aspen Community Development Department Aspen Historic Preservation Land Use Packet City of Aspen | 130 S. Galena Street. | (970) 920 5090 Historic Land Use Application Requirements, Updated: March, ATTACHMENT 5 - PUBLIC HEARING NOTICING REQUIREMENTS The forms of notice are required by the Aspen Land Use Regulations: publication in the newspaper, posting of the property, and surrounding landowners. You can determine whether your application requires notice, and the type of notice it requires, from the matric found in this application packet. Following is a summary of the public notice requirements, including identification of who is responsible for completing the notice. 1. Publication - Publication of notice in a paper of general circulation on the City of Aspen is to be done at least fifteen (15) days prior to the hearing. The legal notice will be written by the Community Development Department and will place the notice in the paper within the appropriate deadline. 2. Posting - Posting of a sign in a conspicuous place on the property is to be done fifteen (15) days prior to the hearing. It is the applicant’s responsibility to obtain a copy of the sign from the Community Development Department, to fill it in correctly and bring proof to the hearing that posting took place (use attached affidavit) 3. Mailing – Mailing of notice is to be made to all owners of property within 300 feet of the subject development parcel by the applicant fifteen (15) days prior to hearing. It is the applicant’s responsibility to obtain a copy of the notice from the Community Development Department, to mail it according to the following standards, and to bring proof to the hearing that the mailing took place (use the attached affidavit). Notice to mineral Estate Owner. An applicant for surface Development shall notify affected mineral estate owners by at least thirty (30) days prior to the date scheduled for the initial public hearing on the application for development. The applicant shall certify that the notice has been provided to the mineral estate owners. The names and addresses of property owners shall be those in the current tax records of Pitkin County as they appeared no more than sixty (60) days prior to the date of public hearing. Proof of notice must be provided at the public hearing. 28 City of Aspen Community Development Department Aspen Historic Preservation Land Use Packet City of Aspen | 130 S. Galena Street. | (970) 920 5090 Historic Land Use Application Requirements, Updated: March, ATTACHMENT 6 - AFFIDAVIT OF PUBLIC NOTICE REQUIRED BY SECTION 26.304.060 (E), ASPEN LAND USE CODE ADDRESS OF PROPERTY: , Aspen, CO SCHEDULED PUBLIC HEARING DATE: , 20 _ STATE OF COLORADO ) ) ss. County of Pitkin ) I, (name, please print) being or representing an Applicant to the City of Aspen, Colorado, hereby personally certify that I have complied with the public notice requirements of Section 26.304.060 (E) of the Aspen Land Use Code in the following manner: Publication of notice: By the publication in the legal notice section of an official paper or a paper of general circulation in the City of Aspen at least fifteen (15) days prior to the public hearing. A copy of the publication is attached hereto. Posting of notice: By posting of notice, which form was obtained from the Community Development Department, which was made of suitable, waterproof materials, which was not less than twenty-two (22) inches wide and twenty-six (26) inches high, and which was composed of letters not less than one inch in height. Said notice was posted at least fifteen (15) days prior to the public hearing and was continuously visible from the day of , 20 , to and including the date and time of the public hearing. A photograph of the posted notice (sign) is attached hereto. Mailing of notice: By the mailing of a notice obtained from the Community Development Department, which contains the information described in Section 26.304.060(E) (2) of the Aspen Land Use Code. At least fifteen (15) days prior to the public hearing, notice was hand delivered or mailed by first class postage prepaid U.S. mail to all owners of property within three hundred (300) feet of the property subject to the development application. The names and addresses of property owners shall be those on the current tax records of Pitkin County as they appeared no more than sixty (60) days prior to the date of the public hearing. A copy of the owners and governmental agencies so noticed is attached hereto. (Continued on next page) 29 City of Aspen Community Development Department Aspen Historic Preservation Land Use Packet City of Aspen | 130 S. Galena Street. | (970) 920 5090 Historic Land Use Application Requirements, Updated: March, Rezoning or text amendment. Whenever the official zoning district map is in any way to be changed or amended incidental to or as part of a general revision of this Title, or whenever the text of this Title is to be amended, whether such revision be made by repeal of this Title and enactment of a new land use regulation, or otherwise, the requirement of an accurate survey map or other sufficient legal description of, and the notice to and listing of names and addresses of owners of real property in the area of the proposed change shall be waived. However, the proposed zoning map shall be available for public inspection in the planning agency during all business hours for fifteen (15) days prior to the public hearing on such amendments. Signature The foregoing “Affidavit of Notice” was acknowledged before me this day of , 20 , by . WITNESS MY HAND AND OFFICIAL SEAL My commission expires: Notary Public ATTACHMENTS: COPY OF THE PUBLICATION PHOTOGRAPH OF THE POSTED NOTICE (SIGN) LIST OF THE OWNERS AND GOVERNMENTAL AGENCIES NOTICED BY MAIL 30 © 2016 Harry Teague Architects.Berko Studio Duplex129 Emma Rd. Suite A Basalt, CO 81621 970 927 4862 info@teaguearch.com www.harryteaguearchitects.com consultant information date stamp issue PRINT DATE: 7/8/16 3:30 PMDesign Development01/27/2016 211/215 East Hallam StreetAspen, CO 81611JOB NO.: 1403 04/04/2016 Construction Documents 06/20/2016 CD Revision 1 Z007 site coverage / setbacks1403_BERKO_ACTIVE_3, BIM Server: htabimserver - BIM Server 18/1403_BERKO_ACTIVE_3HARRY TEAGUE ARCHITECTS 681 sq ft EXISTING SITE COVERAGE 11.35% EXISTING BUILDING6000 sq ft GROSS LOT AREA 6000 sq ft NET LOT AREA property line setback lines 277 sq ft277 sq ft property line setback lines 2,509 sq ft PROPOSED BUILDING FOOTPRINT PROPOSED SITE COVERAGE 46.4% ALLOWED SITE COVERAGE = 50%UPDW J F3'8'5'5'5' 10'5'5'8'-6" primary accessory primary accessory 104 lav property line setback lines front yard side yard side yard rear yardDNUP WDUPprojection into setback allowed per HPC Resolution # 2, Series of 2016 projection into setback allowed per HPC Resolution # 2, Series of 2016 projection into setback allowed per HPC Resolution # 2, Series of 2016 Site Coverage Existing Building Footprint 681 sq ft / 6000 sq ft = 11.35% Proposed Building Footprint (2509 +277) sq ft / 6000 sq ft = 46.4%UPDW J F 104 lav DNUP PARKING SPACE 1: 8'-6" X 18'PARKING SPACE 2: 8'-6" X 18' PARKING SPACE 3: 8'-6" X 18' PARKING SPACE 4: 8'-6" X 18'WDUPSCALE: 1/8" = 1'-0"1 existing site coverage SCALE: 1/8" = 1'-0"2 proposed site coverage SCALE: 1/8" = 1'-0"3 setbacks diagram SCALE: 1/8" = 1'-0"5 parking diagram 31 © 2016 Harry Teague Architects.Berko Studio Duplex129 Emma Rd. Suite A Basalt, CO 81621 970 927 4862 info@teaguearch.com www.harryteaguearchitects.com consultant information date stamp issue PRINT DATE: 7/8/16 3:30 PMDesign Development01/27/2016 211/215 East Hallam StreetAspen, CO 81611JOB NO.: 1403 04/04/2016 Construction Documents 06/20/2016 CD Revision 1 Z008 existing floor area / demolition calculations1403_BERKO_ACTIVE_3, BIM Server: htabimserver - BIM Server 18/1403_BERKO_ACTIVE_3HARRY TEAGUE ARCHITECTS 8 sq ft 50 sq ft 4 sq ft25 sq ft3 sq ft 115 sq ft 35.25 sq ft 10.5 sq ft 10.5 sq ft18 sq ft 18 sq ft 6.25 sq ft 45.75 sq ft10.75 sq ft 198 sq ft 140.5 sq ft 369.5 sq ft 269.5 sq ft 46.75 sq ft 77.25 sq ft 92.75 sq ft 48 sq ft 19.75 sq ft 120 sq ft 75.75 sq ft Wall A AREA REDUCED FOR FENESTRATION WALL AREA TO BE REMOVED EXISTING WALL TO REMAIN Wall B Wall C Wall D 7 sq ft 7 sq ft 264 sq ft 610.25 sq ft Roof BRoof A 0% of Existing Roof of Aspen Modern Historic House to be demolished. New insulation and roofing membrane to be applied over existing, as per HPC Resolution #2, Series 2016 Demolition Calculations City of Aspen Berko Studio Duplex Wall Demoltion Wall Label Individual Wall Area (Sq Ft) Area Reduced for Fenestration (Sq Ft) Area of Wall Area to be Removed (Sq Ft) A 361.00 225.25 127.00 B 301.00 14.25 160.50 C 510.50 60.50 120.00 D 345.25 0.00 75.75 Wall Surface Area Total (Sq Ft)1517.75 Area Reduced for Fenestration (Sq Ft)300.00 Area Used for Demo Calculation (Sq Ft)1217.75 Wall Surface Area to be Removed (Sq Ft)483.25 Demolition Totals Roof + Wall Area Used for Demo Calculations (Sq Ft)=874.25+1217.75 2,092.00 Surface Area to be Removed (Sq Ft)=483.25+0 483.25 Total 23.10% Demolition Calculations- Flat Plane Method City of Aspen Berko Studio Duplex Roof Demolition Roof Label Individual Roof Area (Sq Ft) Area of Wall Area to be Removed (Sq Ft) A 610.25 0.00 B 264.00 0.00 Roof Surface Total (Sq Ft)874.25 Roof Surface Area to be Removed (Sq Ft)0 Demolition Totals Roof + Wall Area Used for Demo Calculation (Sq Ft)=874.25+1217.75 2,092.00 Surface Area to be Removed (Sq Ft)=483.25+0 483.25 Total 23.10% Demolition Calculations City of Aspen Berko Studio Duplex Wall Demoltion Wall Label Individual Wall Area (Sq Ft) Area Reduced for Fenestration (Sq Ft) Area of Wall Area to be Removed (Sq Ft) A 361.00 225.25 127.00 B 301.00 14.25 160.50 C 510.50 60.50 120.00 D 345.25 0.00 75.75 Wall Surface Area Total (Sq Ft)1517.75 Area Reduced for Fenestration (Sq Ft)300.00 Area Used for Demo Calculation (Sq Ft)1217.75 Wall Surface Area to be Removed (Sq Ft)483.25 Demolition Totals Roof + Wall Area Used for Demo Calculations (Sq Ft)=874.25+1217.75 2,092.00 Surface Area to be Removed (Sq Ft)=483.25+0 483.25 Total 23.10% Demolition Calculations- Flat Plane Method City of Aspen Berko Studio Duplex Roof Demolition Roof Label Individual Roof Area (Sq Ft) Area of Wall Area to be Removed (Sq Ft) A 610.25 0.00 B 264.00 0.00 Roof Surface Total (Sq Ft)874.25 Roof Surface Area to be Removed (Sq Ft)0 Demolition Totals Roof + Wall Area Used for Demo Calculation (Sq Ft)=874.25+1217.75 2,092.00 Surface Area to be Removed (Sq Ft)=483.25+0 483.25 Total 23.10% 42 sq ft 25 sq ft 44 sq ft 26 sq ft 119 sq ft 123 sq ft 70 sq ft 72 sq ft 20 sq ft 21 sq ft 100 sq ft 97 sq ft 3'-9"3'-7 1/2"1 2 3 4 5 626'-8"32'-10 1/2"19'-3" 6'-10 3/8"11'-8 5/8"5'-5 1/8"1 2 3 4 5 6 STAINLESS STEELSINKSUNDERTONEK-3340 STAINLESS STEELSINKSUNDERTONEK-3340 Studio Level Overhang Above ALLEYE. HALLAM STREETsetback line property line existing basement A: 666 sq ft ALLEYE. HALLAM STREETsetback line property line deck A: 79.75 sq ft existing main level A: 726.5 sq ft deck A: 39 sq ft EXISTING BASEMENT Existing Basement Level Wall Area Calculations Wall Areas Wall Number Total Wall Area Exposed Wall Area 1 41 20 2 197 97 3 86 42 4 51 25 5 242 119 6 142 70 Overall total wall area 759 Exposed wall area 373 % of Exposed wall (Exposed Wall / Total)49% Basement Level Floor Area (49.14%)(666)327 Main Level Floor Area 727 Total Floor Area 1054 Allowable Deckable (Basement SF + Mains SF) * 15%158 Existing Deck Area 125 1 1 1 1 1 SCALE: 1/8" = 1'-0"3 existing basement wall areas SCALE: 1/8" = 1'-0"1 existing basement plan SCALE: 1/8" = 1'-0"2 existing main level plan 32 © 2016 Harry Teague Architects.Berko Studio Duplex129 Emma Rd. Suite A Basalt, CO 81621 970 927 4862 info@teaguearch.com www.harryteaguearchitects.com consultant information date stamp issue PRINT DATE: 7/8/16 3:30 PMDesign Development01/27/2016 211/215 East Hallam StreetAspen, CO 81611JOB NO.: 1403 04/04/2016 Construction Documents 06/20/2016 CD Revision 1 Z009 FAR calculations1403_BERKO_ACTIVE_3, BIM Server: htabimserver - BIM Server 18/1403_BERKO_ACTIVE_3HARRY TEAGUE ARCHITECTS 8'-2"20'-3"13'8'-8"96 sq ft36 sq ft 168 sq ft 65 sq ft 101 sq ft 39 sq ft 63 sq ft 44 sq ft 42 sq ft 17 sq ft 30 sq ft 98 sq ft 48 sq ft 39 sq ft 21 sq ft 122 sq ft 80 sq ft 113 sq ft44 sq ft 3 21 12 2 31 13 UP split level belowhistoricbelow additionHWH BLRBLR HWHWD14'-2"32'-2"5'-1" 12'-1" 6'-9" 6'-11"4'-9"12'-9"9'-6"5'-10" 9'-3"65 89 1012 11 7 4119 5 8674 1 2 3 10 13 shared Mech. room accessed through 215 E. Hallam (front unit); no access between units studio unit basement A: 801 sq ft studio unit basemt A: 280 sq ft 3Z009 79 sq ft 70 sq ft 12 sq ft 248 sq ft 353 sq ft 54 sq ft 8 sq ft 119 sq ft 263 sq ft 30 sq ft UP HWH BLRBLR HWHWD 40'-10"28'-8"9'-7"9'-1"13'-10"33'-11"6'-3" 11" 19 18 20 151716 16 17 2018 21192114 14 15 1 3 rear unit basement A: 1,078 sq ft 1 Basement areas calculated separately for each unit - it is our understanding that this was an allowable method for calculating basement areas under the zoning code that applies to this project 2 Perimeter of all levels carefully calculated to be to exterior face of structure, typically 3 Planted area in front of walk out basement at Historic Unit removed from perimeter ratio calculations - full wall counted as above grade 4 Exterior stairs added to counted Floor Area 5 Stairs removed from walk-out 6 Overhangs less than 4' maintained 7 Overhang reduced to 4' at South West corner 8 Open walk walkway maintained as 'below- deck' area. Review of definitions of Loggia appear not to apply since the space is not for habitation nor for communication between two interior spaces. Additionally, area is adjacent to garages, not living spaces. 9 Walk-out maintained as central element to relocation of Historic Resource, as approved by HPC - additionally, walk-out floor level is at finished grade of the complete project. Design of walk out area adjusted to be more clearly associated with surrounding landscape elements 10 Volume above extends over grass yard, planted elements, and window well, not deck or patio. Based on the site specific approvals this project received from HPC, Planning and Zoning will not consider the overhang to the east or the overhang over the entrances as loggia, and will not need to add either space into the 15% deck allowance. D B A 90' lower level 100' main level 110' upper level 120'-8" roof 103'-8 1/2" 94'-9 1/4" 4'-4"5'99'-0"1'2'storage family room bedroom entryw/c living / dining kitchen circulation mechanical bedroom studio main level studio lower level existing grade Basement Level Proposed Basement Level Wall Area Calculations Front Unit Basement Wall Number Total Wall Area Exposed Wall Area 1 99 36 2 264 96 3 166 65 4 86 44 5 47 30 6 98 98 7 48 48 8 39 39 9 60 38 10 122 11 80 12 44 13 113 Overall total wall area 1266 Exposed wall area 494 % of Exposed wall (Exposed Wall / Total)39.02% Proposed Basement Level Floor Area Calculations Proposed Basement Gross Floor Area 1086 Proposed Basement Countable Floor Area 424 Rear Unit Basement Wall Number Total Wall Area Exposed Wall Area 14 293 30 15 79 16 82 70 17 248 18 353 19 54 20 8 21 119 Overall total wall area 1236 Exposed wall area 100 % of Exposed wall (Exposed Wall / Total)8.09% Proposed Basement Level Floor Area Calculations Proposed Basement Gross Floor Area 1078 Proposed Basement Countable Floor Area 87 Total Basement Floor Area Counted 511 Total Project FAR Calculations Basement Level Floor Area Counted 511 Main Level Floor Area Counted 2047 Upper Level Floor Area Counted 1384 Deck Area Counted 158 Total FAR Counted 4099 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 SCALE: 1/8" = 1'-0"1 front unit basement areas SCALE: 1/8" = 1'-0"2 rear unit basement areas SCALE: 1/8" = 1'-0"3 floor heights 33 © 2016 Harry Teague Architects.Berko Studio Duplex129 Emma Rd. Suite A Basalt, CO 81621 970 927 4862 info@teaguearch.com www.harryteaguearchitects.com consultant information date stamp issue PRINT DATE: 7/8/16 3:31 PMDesign Development01/27/2016 211/215 East Hallam StreetAspen, CO 81611JOB NO.: 1403 04/04/2016 Construction Documents 06/20/2016 CD Revision 1 Z0010 FAR calculations1403_BERKO_ACTIVE_3, BIM Server: htabimserver - BIM Server 18/1403_BERKO_ACTIVE_3HARRY TEAGUE ARCHITECTS DNF 203 lav DW 3Z009 4 7 front unit upper level A: 279 sq ft rear unit upper level A: 1,105 sq ft deck A: 14 sq ft deck A: 300 sq ft extent of excavation 3Z009 setback line property line deck A: 159 sq ft UPDW J F 104 lav DNUP WD3'-7" 3'-1 1/2" 4' 4 4 6 89 5 7 6 10 10 deck A: 39 sq ft rear unit garage A: 481 sq ft rear unit main level A: 893 sq ft front unit entry level A: 258 sq ft front unit garage A: 268 sq ft front unit main level A: 771 sq ft deck A: 144 sq ft exterior stair A: 42 sq ft 3Z009 1 Basement areas calculated separately for each unit - it is our understanding that this was an allowable method for calculating basement areas under the zoning code that applies to this project 2 Perimeter of all levels carefully calculated to be to exterior face of structure, typically 3 Planted area in front of walk out basement at Historic Unit removed from perimeter ratio calculations - full wall counted as above grade 4 Exterior stairs added to counted Floor Area 5 Stairs removed from walk-out 6 Overhangs less than 4' maintained 7 Overhang reduced to 4' at South West corner 8 Open walk walkway maintained as 'below- deck' area. Review of definitions of Loggia appear not to apply since the space is not for habitation nor for communication between two interior spaces. Additionally, area is adjacent to garages, not living spaces. 9 Walk-out maintained as central element to relocation of Historic Resource, as approved by HPC - additionally, walk-out floor level is at finished grade of the complete project. Design of walk out area adjusted to be more clearly associated with surrounding landscape elements Basement areas calculated separately for each unit - it is our understanding that this was an allowable method for calculating basement areas under the zoning code that applies to this project Perimeter of all levels carefully calculated to be to exterior face of structure, typically Planted area in front of walk out basement at Historic Unit removed from perimeter ratio calculations - full wall counted as above grade 10 Volume above extends over grass yard, planted elements, and window well, not deck or patio. Based on the site specific approvals this project received from HPC, Planning and Zoning will not consider the overhang to the east or the overhang over the entrances as loggia, and will not need to add either space into the 15% deck allowance. Total Project FAR Calculations Basement Level Floor Area Counted 511 Main Level Floor Area Counted 2047 Upper Level Floor Area Counted 1384 Deck Area Counted 158 Total FAR Counted 4099 Main Level Floor Area Calculations - Front Unit Proposed Main Level Area Calculations Front Unit Main Level Front Unit Entry Level Area 258 Front Unit Main Level Area 771 Front Unit Main Level Total 1029 Garage Areas Main Level Front Unit Garage Area 268 Allowable Garage Areas 250 250SF / Unit Garage Area Counted (Area above 500SF at 50%)9 Main Level Floor Area Counted 1038 Upper Level Floor Area Calculations - Front Unit Proposed Upper Level Area Calculations Front Unit Upper Level Front Unit Upper Level Area 279 Front Unit Upper Level Total 279 Upper Level Floor Area Counted 279 Deck Area Calculations - Front Unit Decks Main Level Front Unit North Deck Area 39 Front Unit South Deck Area 144 Front Unit Deck Total 183 Decks Upper Level Landing to Roof Deck 7 50% per Unit Front Unit Deck Total 7 Decks Roof Level Roof Deck Area 79.5 50% per Unit Front Unit Deck Total 79.5 Allowable Deck Area 270 (3600SF x 15%)/2 Gross Deck Area Total 269.5 Deck Area Counted -0.5 Main Level Floor Area Calculations - Rear Unit Proposed Main Level Area Calculations Rear Unit Main Level Rear Unit Main Level Area 893 Rear Unit Main Level Total 893 Garage Areas Main Level Rear Unit Garage Area 481 Allowable Garage Areas 250 250SF / Unit Garage Area Counted (Area above 500SF at 50%)116 Main Level Floor Area Counted 1009 Upper Level Floor Area Calculations - Rear Unit Proposed Upper Level Area Calculations Rear Unit Upper Level Rear Unit Upper Level Area 1105 Rear Unit Upper Level Total 1105 Upper Level Floor Area Counted 1105 Deck Area Calculations - Rear Unit Decks Main Level Exterior Stair to Basement 42 Rear Unit Deck Total 42 Decks Upper Level Rear Unit Upper Level Deck Area 300 Landing to Roof Deck 7 50% per Unit Rear Unit Deck Total 307 Decks Roof Level Roof Deck Area 79.5 50% per Unit Rear Unit Deck Total 79.5 Allowable Deck Area 270 (3600SF x 15%)/2 Gross Deck Area Total 428.5 Deck Area Counted 158.5 01 01 01 SCALE: 1/8" = 1'-0"14 upper level areas SCALE: 1/8" = 1'-0"15 roof areas SCALE: 1/8" = 1'-0"16 main level areas 34 © 2016 Harry Teague Architects.Berko Studio Duplex129 Emma Rd. Suite A Basalt, CO 81621 970 927 4862 info@teaguearch.com www.harryteaguearchitects.com consultant information date stamp issue PRINT DATE: 4/5/16 8:20 PMDesign Development01/27/2016 211/215 East Hallam StreetAspen, CO 81611JOB NO.: 1403 04/04/2016 Construction Documents A101 basement plan1403_BERKO_ACTIVE_3, BIM Server: htabimserver - BIM Server 18/1403_BERKO_ACTIVE_3HARRY TEAGUE ARCHITECTS 1A302 020 UPUP008007 004b 004 002 003 006 012 014 014a 9'-4 1/4"20'-5 1/4" vif 1'-11" vif 5'-9 3/4"31'-1 1/4"3'-1 1/4"11'-8 1/2"6'-3"1'-9"3'-3 1/2"5'-3 1/2"2'-7"11'-7 1/4"1'-5" vif20'-9 1/2"3'-3 3/4" vif8" vif9'-6 1/4" vif1'-1/2" vif3'-9 1/2"10'-4 1/4"1'-9"42'-7 1/2"6'-3"5' -11 3 /4" 10'-9 3/4"5'-3 1/2"9'-8 1/2"21'-1/4"4'-3"2'-8 1/4"11'-9"5'-3 1/2"13'-4 1/4"9'-4 1/4"13'-2 1/4"6'-2"12'-1 1/4"48'-10 1/2"5'-1/2"5'-3 1/2"13'-1/4"24'-9 1/4"9'-6" vif8'-3 1/2" vif 1'-3/4" vif 22'-4 1/4"16'-2 3/4"20'-8"22'-9 3/4"28'-2 1/2" vif9'-4 1/4"13'-2 1/4"9'-2 1/4"40'17'-11 1/2"5'-1/2"5'-3 1/2"30'-8 3/4"19'-1 3/4"4'-10"2'-1/2"5'-11 3/4"eqeq6'-3 1/4" 16'-2 1/2"6'-2"11'-4 1/4"5'-10 3/4" 5'-2 3/4"3'-5 3/4"3'-3 1/2"1'-9" 16.9° 2A204 6 7 8 5 A701 14 15 16 13 A701 2 3 4 1 A701 20 21 22 19 A701 footing drain sump pump 12" x 18" access hatch above,see mech plans plumbing ejector pump 24" x 24" accesspanel for radiant tubing,see mech plans shared Mech. room accessed through 215 E. Hallam (front unit); no access between units alignalignalign alignalignalignalign radon vent pipe rebuild chimneyto match original W13 W12 W8 W6 W11 FD setback line property line RD RD RD RD RD RD RD DwellingSeparationEdge of OriginalStructureUP 36"x30" work space 36"x30" work space radiant tubing manifiold GENERAL NOTES: 1. Contractor to field measure Historic Structure prior to relocation and demolition in order to replicate existing condition after relocation. 2. Interior partitions to be assembly W1 U.N.O. 3. Rough openings for doors to be 3" from adjacent framing U.N.O.8 risers @7 1/2" ea.7 treads @ 10" ea.Elevator 000 Storage 007 Bathroom 006 Family Room 004 Berko Archive 001 Bedroom 008 Circulation 009 Bathroom 014 Storage 011 Mech 012 Storage 013 Storage 015 Storage 016 3A501 1A606 3Z202 #DrgID#LayID 001WD 013 016 015 3'-9 3/4"14'-1/2"10'-4 3/4"3'-1/2" vif 6'-3 1/4"14'-9"9'-10"2'-10 3/4"9'-5 3/4"8'-10 1/4"3'-6 1/4"1'-1 1/2"3'-9"4'-4 1/4"4'-4 3/4"7'-9 1/2"3'3'-11 1/4" eq eq 6'-11 1/4"17'-11 1/2" 12'-6 1/4"3'-7"10 11 12 9 A701 egress window sill 44"above finish floor maxalign 3'x3' egress area Neg Storage 002 Laundry 003 1A301 21 3 4 6 B D A 5 3A302 2A301 #DrgID#LayID SCALE: 1/4" = 1'-0"1 basement plan 35 © 2016 Harry Teague Architects.Berko Studio Duplex129 Emma Rd. Suite A Basalt, CO 81621 970 927 4862 info@teaguearch.com www.harryteaguearchitects.com consultant information date stamp issue PRINT DATE: 4/5/16 8:20 PMDesign Development01/27/2016 211/215 East Hallam StreetAspen, CO 81611JOB NO.: 1403 04/04/2016 Construction Documents A102 main level floor pla1403_BERKO_ACTIVE_3, BIM Server: htabimserver - BIM Server 18/1403_BERKO_ACTIVE_3HARRY TEAGUE ARCHITECTS UP1A302 DN 109 104b 104a 114b 112c 112b 112a 107a 111 106c 105b 106a 110 103 113c 113a 101 102 114a 108 100 107b 109a 106b 105aDNDW J ~ F 3 A605 5 A605 3 A605 7 A605 1 A605 1 A402 1 A401 1 A403 2A204 8'-4 3/4"14'-1 1/2" vif 6'-3 1/4"11'-10 3/4"48'-11 3/4"5'-1/2"5'-3 1/2"7'-4 1/2" vif20'-5 3/4" vif 2'-5" vif 22'-9 3/4"3'-3 1/2"5'-3 1/2"9'-8 1/2"21'-1/4"6'-11 1/4"11'-9"5'-3 1/2"49'-9 1/2"23'5'-3 1/2"2'-6 1/2"11'-6 3/4"12'-5 1/2" vif7'-4" vif6'-5 3/4"10'-8" vif3'-8"9'-4"13'-2 1/4"9'-2 1/4"40'17'-11 1/2"5'-1/2"5'-3 1/2" 2'-4 1/4"6'-6 1/4"eqeq5'-3 1/2"30'-8 3/4"19'-1 3/4"4'-10"36'-11 1/4" vif4'-1 1/4" 23'-5 1/4" vif 1'-1" vif eqeq17'-6 3/4"5'-1"16'-4"5'-6"7'-2 1/4"3'-11 1/4" 6'-6 1/4"3'10'-6"3'-5"9'-7 3/4"9'-7"4'-3/4"4'-9 3/4"4'-3 1/4" 12'-4 1/2"5'-4 3/4"8'-5 1/2"6'-7 3/4"4'-4 3/4"8'-1/4"4'-1 1/4"3'-4 3/4"2'-1 1/4"2'-4 1/2"2' -1 1 /4"5'-3/4"103'-9" 100' 100' 100' 100' 100' 100'-2" 103'-10" 100' = equivalent grade 7896 100' 3A501 1A606 3Z202 6A704 7A704 8A704 9A704 2A205 2 3 4 4 A704 6 7 8 5 A703 2 3 1 A702 2 3 4 1 A706 2 3 4 1 A707 10 11 12 9 A706 14 1513A706 6 7 8 5 A707 2 3 4 1 A708 5 6 7 4 A702 6 7 8 5 A706 9 10 11 8 A702 2 3 4 1 A703 6 7 8 5 A708 concrete entry walk, see landscape plan conc. pavers, see landscape plan slope to drain 1/4" per foot, typ. slope to drain 1/4" per foot, typ. slope to drain 1/4" per foot, typ. paver path, see landscape plan new window in exstg. opening new door in exstg. opening wall flush with bottom of counter alignfinishes alignalign alignalign soffit above overhang above radon vent pipe adjust framing at wall behind washer/dryer to accommodate venting, per mech. align window w/ corner of stucco finish W4 W13 W5x W4 W4 W4 W7 W7 W7 W7 W3 W2 W9 W13 W28 W5 W5 W5 W5 W13 W13 PROPERTY LINEACCESSORY BUILDING SETBACKPRINCIPAL BUILDING SETBACKACCESSORY BUILDING SETBACKPRINCIPAL BUILDING SETBACKWORKBENCHFREEZERSKIS AND POLES DwellingSeparationProvide Dwelling/garage Fire Separation Per IRC 2009 R302.6 Dwelling/garage fire separation and as required by Table R302.6. property line RD RD RD RD RD RD RD GENERAL NOTES: 1. Contractor to field measure Historic Structure prior to relocation and demolition in order to replicate existing condition after relocation. 2. Interior partitions to be assembly W1 U.N.O. 3. Rough openings for doors to be 3" from adjacent framing U.N.O. UP 17 risers @ 7" ea. 16 treads @ 10" ea.6 risers @7 1/2" ea.5 treads @ 10" ea.17 risers @ 7" ea. 17 treads @ 10" ea.8 risers @ 7 1/2" ea.7 treads @ 10" ea.DNUPDW16 risers @ 7 1/2" ea. 15 treads @ 10" ea. Kitchen / Living / Dining 104 Berko Gallery 101Entry 100 Mudroom 102 W/C 103 Bedroom 106 Bathroom 107 Office 110 Elevator 000 Closet 109a Mudroom 109 Laundry 111 Family Room 114 Entry 105 Closet 105a Closet 106a #DrgID#LayID W10 WD113b 1 A402 3'-9 1/2"14'-3/4" vif11'-6 3/4"29'-5" vif3'-10 3/4"7'-7"12'-4 3/4"3'-4 1/4"4'-8 3/4"1A301 Provide 24" x 24" access hatch for radiant tubing gas fireplace corner insert; STUV 95C, install per manufacturer's instructions new window in exstg. opening rebuild cmu chimney to match original setback line rear unit garage 112 front unit garage 113 deck deck 21 3 4 6 B D A 5 3A302 2A301 #DrgID#LayID SCALE: 1/4" = 1'-0"1 main level plan 36 © 2016 Harry Teague Architects.Berko Studio Duplex129 Emma Rd. Suite A Basalt, CO 81621970 927 4862 info@teaguearch.comwww.harryteaguearchitects.com consultant information date stamp issue PRINT DATE: 12/1/21 12:09 PMDesign Development01/27/2016 211/215 East Hallam StreetAspen, CO 81611JOB NO.: 1403 04/04/2016 Construction Documents 06/20/2016 CD Revision 07/12/2017 Construction updates 1 02 A303 building sections1403_BERKO_ACTIVE.pln, /Volumes/HTA Server/1. PROJECT FILES/2. INACTIVE FILES/1403 Berko Studio/4. Drawings + Docs/1. ACTIVE CAD/Archicad 18 to 21 transfer fi e/1403_BERKO_ACTIVE.pln HARRY TEAGUE ARCHITECTS D C B A 90' -1 lower level 100' 1 main level 110' 2 upper level 120'-8" 3 roof SCALE: 1/4" = 1'-0"1 BUILDING SECTION AT COURTYARD 37 © 2016 Harry Teague Architects.Berko Studio Duplex129 Emma Rd. Suite A Basalt, CO 81621970 927 4862 info@teaguearch.comwww.harryteaguearchitects.com consultant information date stamp issue PRINT DATE: 12/1/21 11:54 AMPreliminary Review12/01/2021 211/215 East Hallam StreetAspen, CO 81611JOB NO.: 2109 Z00090 2021 FAR calculations basement addition1403_BERKO_ACTIVE FAR2.pln, /Volumes/HTA Server/1. PROJECT FILES/1.ACTIVE FILES/2108 Berko House Addition/ACTIVE PLN/1403_BERKO_ACTIVE FAR2.plnHARRY TEAGUE ARCHITECTSDBAC 83'-4" 90' lower level 100' main level 110' upper level 120'-8" roof 103'-9 1/4" 94'-7 3/4" 4'-4"5'99'-0"1'2'2'-7" 3'-8" storage family room bedroom entryw/c living / dining kitchen circulation mechanical bedroom studio main level studio lower level existing grade W27 sq ft 12 sq ft8'-3"20'-2"10'-3"2'-3" 5'-8" 12'-1"32'-2"20'-3"9'4'-9"11'-11"4'-9"3'-8" 10'-8"5' 9'-11" 8'-4" 40'-10"5'-4" 6'-10"8'12'-5" 28'-10" 10"8'6'-5"20'5'8'7' min. per code2'-6"3' 12'-1" 14'-9" 12'1'-6"2'-6"3'8'-8"8'8'-8"8'-8"32'-2" 90' 85' 96 sq ft36 sq ft 168 sq ft 65 sq ft 101 sq ft63 sq ft 38 sq ft 36 sq ft 12 sq ft 27 sq ft 85 sq ft 7 sq ft 6 sq ft 92 sq ft 43 sq ft 72 sq ft 14 sq ft 72 sq ft 353 sq ft 46 sq ft 30 sq ft 185 sq ft 262 sq ft 133 sq ft 18 sq ft 27 sq ft 29 sq ft 70 sq ft 26 sq ft17 sq ft 13 sq ft 87 sq ft 248 sq ft 249 sq ft 7 sq ft 51 sq ft 160 sq ft 105 sq ft 12 2 31 1413 UP split level belowhistoricHWH BLRBLR HWH not used rear unit+90 +90additionnot used +90 version 5.3 additionFor single-family and duplex structures, the interior finished floor level shall be no more than fifteen (15) feet below the exterior finished grade. A basement with a stepped floor is allowed. A crawl space below the basement, compliant with the limitations of Section 26.575.020(d)(3), shall be exempt from this depth limitation. not used +85 +90 +98 +94'-8" +94'-7 3/4" +90 +90 Elevator 000 Elev Mach 000 Storage 007 Bathroom 006 Family Room 004 Berko Archive 001 Bedroom 008 Circulation 009 Den 011 Mech 012 Living 013 Play 015 Storage 016 Closet 005 Bathroom 014 bedroom bathWD DW40'-11"28'-10"9'-11"32'-2"5' 20'-3"10'-3"2'-3" 4'-9"3'-8"20'-2" 32'-2"8'-4"5'-8"20'6'-5"10"12'-5"12'9'4'-9"11'-11"12'-1"12'-1"10'-8"5' -4 "6'-9"14'-7"706 sq ft 801 sq ft 1,078 sq ft 281 sq ft 19 18 1716 16 17 18 19 1565 8 12 3 21 11 74 119 5 8674 1 10 1 13 shared Mech. roomaccessed through 215 E. Hallam(front unit); no access between units A1 A1 A2 A3 A4 A7A8 A2 A3 A4 A5 A7 A8 A6 14 A5 A9 A9 A10 15A11 A12 A6 A11 A12 STEP DOWN 5' finish floor is 15' below grade- approx. 13' ceilings studio unit basement A: 801 sq ft rear unit basement A: 1,078 sq ft studio unit basemt A: 281 sq ft Neg Storage 002 Laundry 003 Mech 010 addition A: 706 sq ft egress window well 3Z00090 Basement Level November 30, 2021 V5.3 Proposed Basement Level Wall Area Calculations overall building perimeter Wall Number Total Wall Area Exposed Wall Area 1 99 36 2 264 96 3 166 65 4 74 38 5 39 27 6 98 85 7 7 7 8 6 6 11 92 0 12 43 0 13 105 0 14 278 30 15 72 0 16 86 72 17 249 0 18 353 0 19 46 0 A1 185 0 A2 262 0 A3 133 0 A4 18 0 A5 55 27 A6 7 0 A7 51 0 A8 160 0 A9 46 17 A10 23 14 A11 96 26 A12 99 12 Overall total wall area 3212 Exposed wall area 558 % of Exposed wall (Exposed Wall / Total)17.37% Proposed Basement Level Floor Area Calculations studio & addition Basement Gross Floor Area 1788 Proposed Basement Countable Floor Area 311 rear unit basement 1078 Proposed Basement Countable Floor Area 187.27 basement total 497.89 Total Project FAR Calculations Basement Level Floor Area Counted 498 Main Level Floor Area Counted 2183.5 Upper Level Floor Area Counted 1384 Deck Area Counted 34 Total FAR Counted 4100 SCALE: 1/8" = 1'-0"3 floor heights BASEMENT ADDITION EXISTING EXISTING 1' WIDE SOIL BETWEEN THE UNITS Version 5.3 Dec. 1, 2021 38 © 2016 Harry Teague Architects.Berko Studio Duplex129 Emma Rd. Suite A Basalt, CO 81621970 927 4862 info@teaguearch.comwww.harryteaguearchitects.com consultant information date stamp issue PRINT DATE: 12/1/21 11:54 AMPreliminary Review12/01/2021 211/215 East Hallam StreetAspen, CO 81611JOB NO.: 2109 Z0010 2021 FAR calculations main and upper levelAR calculations1403_BERKO_ACTIVE FAR2.pln, /Volumes/HTA Server/1. PROJECT FILES/1.ACTIVE FILES/2108 Berko House Addition/ACTIVE PLN/1403_BERKO_ACTIVE FAR2.plnHARRY TEAGUE ARCHITECTS 257 sq ft 25 sq ft F11'-10"3" 203 lav deck A: 283 sq ft DW 99.5°170.5° 3Z00090 18 sq ft 4 7 front unit upper level A: 279 sq ft rear unit upper level A: 1,105 sq ft deck A: 14 sq ft 02 extent of excavation 3Z00090 setback line property line deck A: 159 sq ft 1 sq ft DW J F 104 lav DNUPNEW TURF PATIO ROOF AT GRADE(100'/ 7896')ENTRY ACCESSLUC 26.575.010 (6)Patios. Patios developed at or within six (6) inches of finished grade shall not be counted towards Floor Area. Patio. An outdoor uncovered, at- grade space which may be paved or unpaved.WD3'-7" 3'-1 1/2" 4' 4 4 6 89 5 7 6 10 10 deck A: 39 sq ft rear unit garage A: 481 sq ft rear unit main level A: 893 sq ft front unit entry level A: 258 sq ft front unit garage A: 268 sq ft front unit main level A: 771 sq ft deck A: 144 sq ft exterior stair A: 42 sq ft 3Z00090 Main Level Floor Area Calculations Proposed Main Level Area Calculations Studio Unit Main Level Studio Unit Entry Level Gross Area 258 Studio Unit Main Level Gross Area 783 Studio Unit Main Level Total 1041 Rear Unit Main Level Rear Unit Main Level Gross Area 893 Rear Unit Main Level Total 893 Garage Areas Main Level Rear Unit Garage Gross Area 481 Studio Unit Garage Gross Area 259 Studio Unit Garage Gross Area 259 Garage Totals 999 Allowable Garage Areas 500 250SF / Unit Garage Area Counted (Area above 500SF at 50%)249.5 Main Level Floor Area Counted 2183.5 Upper Level Floor Area Calculations Upper Level Floor Area Calculations Proposed Main Level Area Calculations Studio Unit Upper Level Studio Unit Upper Level Gross Area 279 Studio Unit Upper Level Total 279 Rear Unit Main Level Rear Unit Upper Level Gross Area 1105 Rear Unit Upper Level Total 1105 Main Level Floor Area Counted 1384 Deck Area Calculations Decks Main Level Studio Unit North Deck Gross Area 46 Studio Unit South Deck Gross Area 136 Exterior Stair to Basement 42 Studio Unit Deck Total 224 Decks Upper Level Rear Unit Upper Level Deck Gross Area 257 Landing to Roof Deck 14 Studio Unit Deck Total 271 Decks Roof Level Roof Deck Gross Area 79 Studio Unit Deck Total 79 Allowable Deck Area 540 3600SF x 15% Gross Deck Area Total 574 Deck Area Counted 34 Main Level Floor Area Calculations Proposed Main Level Area Calculations Studio Unit Main Level Studio Unit Entry Level Gross Area 258 Studio Unit Main Level Gross Area 783 Studio Unit Main Level Total 1041 Rear Unit Main Level Rear Unit Main Level Gross Area 893 Rear Unit Main Level Total 893 Garage Areas Main Level Rear Unit Garage Gross Area 481 Studio Unit Garage Gross Area 259 Studio Unit Garage Gross Area 259 Garage Totals 999 Allowable Garage Areas 500 250SF / Unit Garage Area Counted (Area above 500SF at 50%)249.5 Main Level Floor Area Counted 2183.5 Upper Level Floor Area Calculations Upper Level Floor Area Calculations Proposed Main Level Area Calculations Studio Unit Upper Level Studio Unit Upper Level Gross Area 279 Studio Unit Upper Level Total 279 Rear Unit Main Level Rear Unit Upper Level Gross Area 1105 Rear Unit Upper Level Total 1105 Main Level Floor Area Counted 1384 Deck Area Calculations Decks Main Level Studio Unit North Deck Gross Area 46 Studio Unit South Deck Gross Area 136 Exterior Stair to Basement 42 Studio Unit Deck Total 224 Decks Upper Level Rear Unit Upper Level Deck Gross Area 257 Landing to Roof Deck 14 Studio Unit Deck Total 271 Decks Roof Level Roof Deck Gross Area 79 Studio Unit Deck Total 79 Allowable Deck Area 540 3600SF x 15% Gross Deck Area Total 574 Deck Area Counted 34 Total Project FAR Calculations Basement Level Floor Area Counted 498 Main Level Floor Area Counted 2183.5 Upper Level Floor Area Counted 1384 Deck Area Counted 34 Total FAR Counted 4100 SCALE: 1/8" = 1'-0"5 upper level areas SCALE: 1/8" = 1'-0"6 roof areas SCALE: 1/8" = 1'-0"7 main level areas REMOVE DECK, REPLACE WITH PLANTER Version 5.3 Dec. 1, 2021 39 © 2016 Harry Teague Architects.Berko Studio Duplex129 Emma Rd. Suite A Basalt, CO 81621970 927 4862 info@teaguearch.comwww.harryteaguearchitects.com consultant information date stamp issue PRINT DATE: 12/1/21 12:20 PMPreliminary Review12/01/2021 211/215 East Hallam StreetAspen, CO 81611JOB NO.: 2109 A101 basement plan1403_BERKO_ACTIVE FAR2.pln, /Volumes/HTA Server/1. PROJECT FILES/1.ACTIVE FILES/2108 Berko House Addition/ACTIVE PLN/1403_BERKO_ACTIVE FAR2.plnHARRY TEAGUE ARCHITECTS W014a 5Z011 020 019 UP 004b004b 008007007a 003 015 018 012 004002 006 012a UP UP9'-4 1/4"20'-5 1/2" vif 1'-11" vif 5'-9 3/4"31'-1 1/4"3'-1 1/4"11'-8 1/2"6'-3"1'-7 1/2"3'-5"5'-3 1/2"2'-7"11'-7 1/4"1'-5" vif20'-9 1/2"3'-3 3/4" vif8" vif9'-6 1/4" vif1'-1/2" vif3'-9 1/2"10'-4 1/4"1'-9"42'-7 1/2"6'-3"5' -11 3 /4 " 10'-9 3/4"5'-3 1/2"9'-8 1/2"21'-1/2"4'-3"2'-8 1/4"11'-9"5'-3 1/2"13'-4 1/4"9'-4 1/4"13'-2 1/4"6'-2"12'-1 1/4"48'-10 1/2"5'-1/2"5'-3 1/2"13'-1/4"24'-9 1/4"9'-6 1/4" vif8'-3 1/2" vif 1'-3/4" vif 22'-4 1/4"36'-10 3/4"22'-8 1/4" 9'-4 1/4"13'-2 1/4"9'-2 1/4"40'17'-11 1/2"5'-1/2"5'-3 1/2"21'-7 1/2"9'-1 1/4"19'-1 3/4"4'-10"2'-3/4"eq15'-1/2"1' 13'-7 1/4"3'-5 3/4"6'-10 3/4"8'-1 3/4"6'-3" 4'-1 1/4"4'-4 3/4" 17'-8 1/2"4'-1 1/4"11'-4"4'-1/2"8'-5 1/4"2 1/2" to R.O.10'-6" 13'-5 1/2"8'-8"7'-10" 4 1/2"2'-3 1/2"4 1/2" 5'-8"5'-4"1'-10"2'-4 1/2"4'-4"3'-4" clear 1'7' min. per code2'-6"3' 90' 85' 16.9° 2A204 6 7 8 5 A701 14 15 16 13 A701 2 3 4 1 A701 20 21 22 19 A701 footing drain sump pump 12" x 18" access hatch above,see mech plans 30" plumbing ejector pump alignalignalign alignalign radon vent pipe rebuild chimneyto match original radon vent pipe align provide rough in forfuture sink provide power forfuture refridgerator align W13 W12 setback line property line RD RD RD RD RD RD DwellingSeparationEdge of OriginalStructureUP 36"x30" work space 36"x30" work space radiant tubingmanifiold GENERAL NOTES: 1. Contractor to field measure Historic Structure prior to relocation and demolition in order to replicate existing condition after relocation. 2. Interior partitions to be assembly W1 U.N.O. 3. Rough openings for doors to be 3" from adjacent framing U.N.O.radiant tubingmanifioldareaway finishfinish For single-family and duplex structures, the interior finished floor level shall be no more than fifteen (15) feet below the exterior finished grade. A basement with a stepped floor is allowed. A crawl space below the basement, compliant with the limitations of Section 26.575.020(d)(3), shall be exempt from this depth limitation. Elevator 000 Elev Mach 000 Storage 007 Bathroom 006 Family Room 004 Berko Archive 001 Bedroom 008 Circulation 009 Den 011 Mech 012 Living 013 Play 015 Storage 016 Closet 005 Bathroom 014 bedroom bath 3A501 1A606 7A603 #DrgID#LayID #DrgID#LayID #DrgID#LayID 3Z202 12A603 119 120 001WD DW013 016 01524'-5 1/4"6'-3 1/4"14'-9" 6'-6 3/4"2'-8"3'-5 1/4"11'-3"2'-3 3/4"3 1/2"9'-1/4"8'-4"3'-6 1/4"1'-1 1/2" 6'-3 1/4"8'-9 1/4"4'-1 1/4"8'-9"3'-2"3'-11 1/4" eq 1'-11 1/2" 6'-11 1/4"17'-11 1/2" 12'-3 3/4"5'-1 1/4"15'-8 3/4" 12'-6 1/4"3'-7"3'-9"4'-3 1/2"10'-9"4 1/2" finish4'-5 1/2"6 1/2"10 11 12 9 A701 egress window sill 44"above finish floor max 24" x 24" accesspanel for radiant tubing,see mech plansalign 30" plumbing ejector pump alignalign masonry to turncorner to visiblearea covered by1x3 trim alignalign ledger for decking; cutat angled concrete tobring bottom of deckingflush with 2" concretelip metal plates aroundstair landing perlandscape drawings provide rough in forfuture dish washer provide power forfuture range oven provide rough ins forfuture stackablewasher and dryer recessed niche for TV align W8 W11 RD 3'x3' egress area 8 risers @7 1/2" ea.7 treads @ 10" ea.8 risers @7 1/2" ea. 7 treads @ 10" ea. STEP DOWN 5' finish floor is 15' below grade- approx. 13' ceilings Neg Storage 002 Laundry 003 Mech 010 addition A: 706 sq ft egress window well 1A301 #DrgID#LayID 21 3 4 6 B D A 5 C 3 4Z011 2Z011 6'-1"crawlspace 3Z202 SCALE: 1/4" = 1'-0"1 basement plan SCALE: 1/4" = 1'-0"2 crawlspace BASEMENT ADDITION VERSION 5.3 Dec. 1, 2021 40 © 2016 Harry Teague Architects.Berko Studio Duplex129 Emma Rd. Suite A Basalt, CO 81621970 927 4862 info@teaguearch.comwww.harryteaguearchitects.com consultant information date stamp issue PRINT DATE: 12/1/21 11:54 AMPreliminary Review12/01/2021 211/215 East Hallam StreetAspen, CO 81611JOB NO.: 2109 A102 main level fl or plan1403_BERKO_ACTIVE FAR2.pln, /Volumes/HTA Server/1. PROJECT FILES/1.ACTIVE FILES/2108 Berko House Addition/ACTIVE PLN/1403_BERKO_ACTIVE FAR2.plnHARRY TEAGUE ARCHITECTS DN5Z011 DN 109 104a 114b 112c 112b 112a 107a 111 106c 105a 106a 110 103 113c 113a 101 104c 102 114a 108 100 107b 109a 106b 105 104b DW J F 3 A605 5 A605 3 A605 7 A605 1 A605 1 A402 1 A403 01 6 risers @7 1/2" ea.5 treads @ 10" ea.8 risers @7 1/2" ea.7 treads @10" ea.UP DN UP 10 risers @7 1/2" ea.9 treads @10" ea.2A204 109b 109c 109d 1 A401 8'-4 3/4"14'-1 1/2" vif 6'-3 1/4"11'-10 3/4"48'-11 3/4"5'-1/2"5'-3 1/2"7'-4 1/2" vif20'-3"2'-5" vif 22'-9 3/4"3'-5"5'-3 1/2"9'-8 1/2"21'-1/4"6'-11 1/4"11'-9"5'-3 1/2"49'-9 1/2"23'5'-3 1/2"2'-6 1/2"11'-6 3/4"12'-5 1/2" vif7'-4" vif6'-5 3/4"10'-8" vif3'-8"9'-4"13'-2 1/4"9'-2 1/4"40'17'-11 1/2"5'-1/2"5'-3 1/2" 2'-7 1/4"6'-3 1/4"eqeq5'-3 1/2"30'-8 3/4"19'-1 3/4"4'-10"36'-11 1/4" vif4'-1 1/4" 23'-5 1/4" vif 3'-9" vif 3'-1/4" 1'-1" vif eqeq17'-6 3/4"5'-2"16'-3"5'-6" 3'-11 1/4" 6'-5"3'-1 1/4"10'-6"4'-3 1/4" 12'-3"5'-7"8'-5 1/2"6'-8"8'-9 1/4"4'-1 1/4"8'-9"3'-1 1/4"3'-6 1/2"2'-1 1/2"2'-6 1/2"2' -1 1 /4 " 17'-9 3/4"4'-1 1/4"11'-4" 6'-5 1/2" 3'-3 1/2" 5'-5 1/4"7 3/4"3'-10 3/4"8'-2"1' 2'-6 3/4"8'-7 1/4"1'-10 3/4"3'-3 1/2"1'-4 3/4"2'-9 1/4"3' clear to finish 1 1/2"1 1/2"1 1/2"3' clear to finish1"103'-9" 100' 100' 100' 100' 100' 100'-2" 103'-10" 100' = equivalent grade 7896 100' 3A501 1A606 7A603 #DrgID#LayID #DrgID#LayID #DrgID#LayID 3Z202 6A704 7A704 8A704 9A704 2A206 1A-7.18 2 3 4 4 A704 6 7 8 5 A703 2 3 1 A702 2 3 4 1 A706 2 3 4 1 A707 10 11 12 9 A706 14 1513A706 6 7 8 5 A707 2 3 4 1 A708 5 6 7 4 A702 6 7 8 5 A706 9 10 11 8 A702 2 3 4 1 A703 6 7 8 5 A708 concrete entry walk,see landscape plan conc. pavers, see landscape plan slope to drain 1/4" per foot, typ. slope to drain 1/4" per foot, typ. slope to drain 1/4" per foot, typ. paver path, see landscape plan new window inexstg. opening new door in exstg. opening wall flush with bottom of counter alignfinishes alignalign alignalign dryer pipe and washer taps in wall behind located per w/d manufacturer overhang above adjust framing at wall behindwasher/dryer to accommodateventing, per mech. align window w/ corner of stucco finish alignfinishalignfinishalignfinishalignfinishalignfinish alignfinish alignfinishalignfinishalignfinish alignsteel flat bar stubups: 3/4" x 1.5" W4 W13 W4 W4 W4 W7 W7 W7 W7 W3 W9 W13 W13 W28 W5 W5 W5 W5 W13 W14 W10 104 lav PROPERTY LINEACCESSORY BUILDING SETBACKPRINCIPAL BUILDING SETBACKACCESSORY BUILDING SETBACKPRINCIPAL BUILDING SETBACKWORKBENCHFREEZERSKIS AND POLES DwellingSeparationProvide Dwelling/garage Fire SeparationPer IRC 2009 R302.6 Dwelling/garage fireseparation and as required by TableR302.6. property line RD RD RD RD RD RD RD GENERAL NOTES: 1. Contractor to field measure Historic Structure prior to relocation and demolition in order to replicate existing condition after relocation. 2. Interior partitions to be assembly W1 U.N.O. 3. Rough openings for doors to be 3" from adjacent framing U.N.O. UP 17 risers @ 7" ea.17 treads @ 11" ea. 17 risers @ 7" ea. 16 treads @ 10" ea. DNUP16 risers @ 7 1/2" ea. 15 treads @ 10" ea. NEW TURF PATIO ROOF AT GRADE(100'/ 7896')ENTRY ACCESSLUC 26.575.010 (6)Patios. Patios developed at or within six (6) inches of finished grade shall not be counted towards Floor Area. Patio. An outdoor uncovered, at- grade space which may be paved or unpaved.GUARDGUARD WINDOW WELL BELOW WITH GRATE Kitchen / Living / Dining 104 Berko Gallery 101Entry 100 Mudroom 102 W/C 103 Bedroom 106 Bathroom 107 Office 110 Elevator 000 Closet 109a Mudroom 109 Laundry 111 Family Room 114 Entry 105 Closet 105a Closet 106a 12A603 119 120 WD113b 5'-1"1 A402 3'-9 1/2"14'-3/4" vif11'-6 3/4"29'-5" vif3'-6"8'-2"12'-2 3/4"3'-3/4"3'-4 1/4"4'-8 3/4"4'-10"1A301 #DrgID#LayID Provide 24" x 24" access hatch for radiant tubing gas fireplace cornerinsert; STUV 95C,install permanufacturer'sinstructions new window in exstg. opening rebuild cmu chimney to match original radon vent pipe;route throughchimneymasonry face ofmasonrybelow railing face mounted to deck faciaalignfinishalignfinishconfirm dimensionto allow for gasfireplace and radonpipe clearance wood fins tobe centeredon exposedcolumn edge of floor finish below stair new roof drain; coordinaterouting for minimal impact tospace 2x3 framing andgyp. at closet inlieu of cabinetry 109b, 109c, and 109d to be 2'-4" x 7'panel doors to matchother wood doors setback line DWRD rear unit garage 112 front unit garage 113 deck deck 21 3 4 6 B D A 5 C 3 4Z011 2Z011 SCALE: 1/4" = 1'-0"1 main level plan NEW DOOR 41 © 2016 Harry Teague Architects.Berko Studio Duplex129 Emma Rd. Suite A Basalt, CO 81621970 927 4862 info@teaguearch.comwww.harryteaguearchitects.com consultant information date stamp issue PRINT DATE: 12/1/21 12:37 PMPreliminary Review12/01/2021 211/215 East Hallam StreetAspen, CO 81611JOB NO.: 2109 A301 building sections1403_BERKO_ACTIVE FAR2.pln, /Volumes/HTA Server/1. PROJECT FILES/1.ACTIVE FILES/2108 Berko House Addition/ACTIVE PLN/1403_BERKO_ACTIVE FAR2.plnHARRY TEAGUE ARCHITECTS D C B A 83'-4" -2 crawlspace 90' -1 lower level 100' 1 main level 110' 2 upper level 120'-8" 3 roof NEW BASEMENT NEW CRAWL NEW BEDROOM EXISTING EXISTING EXISTING SCALE: 1/4" = 1'-0"1 BUILDING SECTION 42 © 2016 Harry Teague Architects.Berko Studio Duplex129 Emma Rd. Suite A Basalt, CO 81621 970 927 4862 info@teaguearch.com www.harryteaguearchitects.com consultant information date stamp issue PRINT DATE: 12/14/21 2:33 PMDrawing Set12/14/2021 211/215 East Hallam StreetAspen, CO 81611JOB NO.: 2109 Z00090 2021 FAR calculations basement addition2108_BERKO_ACTIVE FAR2.pln, /Volumes/HTA Server/1. PROJECT FILES/1.ACTIVE FILES/2108 Berko House Addition/ACTIVE PLN/2108_BERKO_ACTIVE FAR2.plnHARRY TEAGUE ARCHITECTSDBAC 83'-4" 90' lower level 100' main level 110' upper level 120'-8" roof 103'-9 1/4" 94'-7 3/4" 4'-4"5'99'-0"1'2'2'-7" 3'-8" storage family room bedroom entryw/c living / dining kitchen circulation mechanical bedroom studio main level studio lower level existing grade W27 sq ft 12 sq ft8'-3"20'-2"10'-3"2'-3" 5'-8" 12'-1"32'-2"20'-3"9'4'-9"11'-11"4'-9"3'-8" 10'-8"5' 9'-11" 8'-4" 40'-10"5'-4" 6'-10"8'12'-5" 28'-10" 10"8'6'-5"20'5'8'7' min. per code2'-6"3' 12'-1" 14'-9" 12'1'-6"2'-6"3'8'-8"8'8'-8"8'-8"32'-2" 21'-11"15'-6"21'-10"1'1'90' 85' 96 sq ft36 sq ft 168 sq ft 65 sq ft 101 sq ft63 sq ft 38 sq ft 36 sq ft 12 sq ft 27 sq ft 85 sq ft 7 sq ft 6 sq ft 92 sq ft 43 sq ft 72 sq ft 14 sq ft 72 sq ft 353 sq ft 46 sq ft 30 sq ft 185 sq ft 262 sq ft 133 sq ft 18 sq ft 27 sq ft 29 sq ft 70 sq ft 26 sq ft 17 sq ft 13 sq ft 87 sq ft 248 sq ft 249 sq ft 7 sq ft 51 sq ft 160 sq ft 105 sq ft 12 2 31 1413 new concrete wall(typ) new stair UP split level belowhistoricHWH BLRBLR HWH not used rear unit+90 +90additionnot used +90addition not used +85 +90 +98 +94'-8" +94'-7 3/4" +90 +90 Elevator 000 Elev Mach 000 Storage 007 Bathroom 006 Family Room 004 Berko Archive 001 Bedroom 008 Circulation 009 Den 011 Mech 012 Living 013 Play 015 Storage 016 Closet 005 Bathroom 014 bedroom bathWD DW40'-11"28'-10"9'-11"32'-2"5' 20'-3"10'-3"2'-3" 4'-9"3'-8"20'-2" 32'-2"8'-4"5'-8"20'6'-5"10"12'-5"12'9'4'-9"11'-11"12'-1"12'-1"10'-8"5' -4"6'-9"14'-7"706 sq ft 801 sq ft 1,078 sq ft 281 sq ft 19 18 1716 16 17 18 19 1565 8 12 3 21 11 74 119 5 8674 10 13 shared Mech. room accessed through 215 E. Hallam (front unit); no access between units A1 A1 A2 A3 A4 A7A8 A2 A3 A4 A5 A7 A8 A6 14 A5 A9 A9 A10 15A11 A12 A6 A11 A12 STEP DOWN 5'8 risers @7 1/2" ea.7 treads @ 10" ea.8 risers @7 1/2" ea.7 treads @ 10" ea.8 risers @7 1/2" ea. 7 treads @ 10" ea. addition A: 706 sq ft studio unit basement A: 801 sq ft rear unit basement A: 1,078 sq ft studio unit basemt A: 281 sq ft Neg Storage 002 Laundry 003 Mech 010 egress window well 3 Z00090 Basement Level November 30, 2021 V5.3 Proposed Basement Level Wall Area Calculations overall building perimeter Wall Number Total Wall Area Exposed Wall Area 1 99 36 2 264 96 3 166 65 4 74 38 5 39 27 6 98 85 7 7 7 8 6 6 11 92 0 12 43 0 13 105 0 14 278 30 15 72 0 16 86 72 17 249 0 18 353 0 19 46 0 A1 185 0 A2 262 0 A3 133 0 A4 18 0 A5 55 27 A6 7 0 A7 51 0 A8 160 0 A9 46 17 A10 A11 96 26 A12 99 12 Overall total wall area Exposed wall area % of Exposed wall (Exposed Wall / Total) Proposed Basement Level Floor Area Calculations studio & addition Basement Gross Floor Area 1788 Proposed Basement Countable Floor Area rear unit basement 1078 Proposed Basement Countable Floor Area basement total SCALE: 1/8" = 1'-0"3 floor heights BASEMENT ADDITION EXISTING EXISTING 1' WIDE SOIL BETWEEN THE UNITS 43 © 2016 Harry Teague Architects.Berko Studio Duplex129 Emma Rd. Suite A Basalt, CO 81621 970 927 4862 info@teaguearch.com www.harryteaguearchitects.com consultant information date stamp issue PRINT DATE: 12/14/21 2:33 PMDrawing Set12/14/2021 211/215 East Hallam StreetAspen, CO 81611JOB NO.: 2109 Z0010 2021 FAR calculations main and upper levelAR calculations2108_BERKO_ACTIVE FAR2.pln, /Volumes/HTA Server/1. PROJECT FILES/1.ACTIVE FILES/2108 Berko House Addition/ACTIVE PLN/2108_BERKO_ACTIVE FAR2.plnHARRY TEAGUE ARCHITECTS 257 sq ft 25 sq ft F11'-10"3" 203 lav deck A: 283 sq ft DW 99.5°170.5° 3 18 sq ft front unit upper level A: 279 sq ft rear unit upper level A: 1,105 sq ft deck A: 14 sq ft extent of excavation 3 Z00090 setback line property line deck A: 159 sq ft 1 sq ft DW J F 104 lav DNUPNEW TURF PATIO ROOF AT GRADE(100'/ 7896')NEW ENTRY ACCESS LUC 26.575.010 (6)Patios. Patios developed at or within six (6) inches of finished grade shall not be counted towards Floor Area. Patio. An outdoor uncovered, at- grade space which may be paved or unpaved.WD3'-7" 3'-1 1/2" 4' deck A: 39 sq ft rear unit garage A: 481 sq ft rear unit main level A: 893 sq ft front unit entry level A: 258 sq ft front unit garage A: 268 sq ft front unit main level A: 771 sq ft deck A: 144 sq ft exterior stair A: 42 sq ft 3 Z00090 Rear Unit Upper Level Total 1105 Main Level Floor Area Counted 1384 Deck Area Calculations Decks Main Level Studio Unit North Deck Gross Area 46 Studio Unit South Deck Gross Area 136 Exterior Stair to Basement 42 Studio Unit Deck Total 224 Decks Upper Level Rear Unit Upper Level Deck Gross Area 257 Landing to Roof Deck 14 Studio Unit Deck Total 271 Decks Roof Level Roof Deck Gross Area 79 Studio Unit Deck Total 79 Allowable Deck Area 540 3600SF x 15% Gross Deck Area Total 574 Deck Area Counted 34 Main Level Floor Area Calculations Proposed Main Level Area Calculations Studio Unit Main Level Studio Unit Entry Level Gross Area 258 Studio Unit Main Level Gross Area 783 Studio Unit Main Level Total 1041 Rear Unit Main Level Rear Unit Main Level Gross Area 893 Rear Unit Main Level Total 893 Garage Areas Main Level Rear Unit Garage Gross Area 481 Studio Unit Garage Gross Area 259 Studio Unit Garage Gross Area 259 Garage Totals 999 Allowable Garage Areas 500 250SF / Unit Garage Area Counted (Area above 500SF at 50%)249.5 Main Level Floor Area Counted 2183.5 Upper Level Floor Area Calculations SCALE: 1/8" = 1'-0"6 roof areas SCALE: 1/8" = 1'-0"7 main level areas REMOVE DECK, REPLACE WITH PLANTER 44 © 2016 Harry Teague Architects.Berko Studio Duplex129 Emma Rd. Suite A Basalt, CO 81621 970 927 4862 info@teaguearch.com www.harryteaguearchitects.com consultant information date stamp issue PRINT DATE: 12/14/21 2:33 PMDrawing Set12/14/2021 211/215 East Hallam StreetAspen, CO 81611JOB NO.: 2109 Z0010 2021 FAR calculations main and upper levelAR calculations2108_BERKO_ACTIVE FAR2.pln, /Volumes/HTA Server/1. PROJECT FILES/1.ACTIVE FILES/2108 Berko House Addition/ACTIVE PLN/2108_BERKO_ACTIVE FAR2.plnHARRY TEAGUE ARCHITECTS Main Level Floor Area Counted 1384 Deck Area Calculations Decks Main Level Studio Unit North Deck Gross Area 46 Studio Unit South Deck Gross Area 136 Exterior Stair to Basement 42 Studio Unit Deck Total 224 Decks Upper Level Rear Unit Upper Level Deck Gross Area 257 Landing to Roof Deck 14 Studio Unit Deck Total 271 Decks Roof Level Roof Deck Gross Area 79 Studio Unit Deck Total 79 Allowable Deck Area 540 3600SF x 15% Gross Deck Area Total 574 Deck Area Counted 34 45 HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION WORK SESSION AGENDA August 24, 2022 1.Review any requests from HP Commissioners 2.New HPC Forms – discuss improvements and future forms 3.Next Work Sessions 46 Historic Preservation Project Project Monitor Review Request Form REQUEST NUMBER (Year, Number): PROPERTY ADDRESS: APPLICANT REPRESENTATIVE: CONTACT NUMBER & EMAIL: Written description of request for change: Following Items must be included with this document for Staff & Monitor Review: H PC Resolutions for the project HPC Meeting Minutes for the approval Approved Drawings and Drawings for requested change with clear call-outs Staff & Monitor Determination: APPROVED HPC BOARD REVIEW Staff & Monitor Determination provided This ___ day of __________,2022. Disclaimer: Issuance of this approval is specific to the design review and based on the information provided by the applicant. It will be the applicant’s responsibility to update permit information for re-review and approval by all relevant revie w agencies. 47