The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink Aboutagenda.apz.20220920AGENDA ASPEN PLANNING & ZONING COMMISSION September 20, 2022 4:30 PM, WebEx Virtual Meeting (See agenda packet for instructions to join the meeting) I.VIRTUAL MEETING INSTRUCTIONS TO JOIN ONLINE: Join the Meeting Enter your name and then click the button to join. --- OR --- Go to www.webex.com and click on "Join a Meeting" Enter Meeting Number: 2552 188 4103 Enter Password: 81611 Click "Join Meeting" -- OR -- JOIN BY PHONE Call: 1-650-479-3208 Enter Meeting Number: 2552 188 4103 Enter Password: 81611 II.ROLL CALL III.COMMENTS IV.MINUTES IV.A Draft Minutes for May 17, 2022 V.DECLARATION OF CONFLICT OF INTEREST VI.PUBLIC HEARINGS VI.A Burlingame Triangle Parcel | Major Subdivision minutes.apz.20220517.docx Memo to P&Z_Triangle Parcel _.pdf Resolution No. XX_Series of 2022_Burlingame_Triangle Parcel_Major Subdivision.pdf Exhibit A_General Subdivision Review Standards.pdf Exhibit B_Major Subdivision Review Standards.pdf Exhibit C_AVLT Letter and Entitlement Docs.pdf Exhibit D_Application.pdf 1 VII.OTHER BUSINESS VII.ALumberyard Affordable Housing Project Update VIII.ADJOURN P&Z Lumberyard Update Sept 20 2022.pdf NEXT RESOLUTION NUMBER: #13, SERIES 2022 TYPICAL PROCEEDING FORMAT FOR ALL PUBLIC HEARINGS 1) Conflicts of Interest (handled at beginning of agenda) 2) Provide proof of legal notice (affidavit of notice for PH) 3) Staff presentation 4) Board questions and clarifications of staff 5) Applicant presentation 6) Board questions and clarifications of applicant 7) Public comments 8) Board questions and clarifications relating to public comments 9) Close public comment portion of bearing 10) Staff rebuttal/clarification of evidence presented by applicant and public comment 11) Applicant rebuttal/clarification End of fact finding. Deliberation by the commission commences. No further interaction between commission and staff, applicant or public 12) Chairperson identified the issues to be discussed among commissioners. 13) Discussion between commissioners* 14) Motion* *Make sure the discussion and motion includes what criteria are met or not met Revised January 9, 2021 2 Minutes Aspen Planning and Zoning Commission May 17, 2022 Page 1 of 7 Chairperson McGovern called the regular Planning and Zoning (P&Z) meeting for May 17 th, 2022 to order at 4:30 PM. Commissioners in attendance: Brittanie Rockhill, Christine Benedetti, Sam Rose, Spencer McKnight, and Teraissa McGovern. New member Mr. Jason Suazo joined the meeting as of 6:41 pm. He did not participate in the hearing or discussion. Staff in Attendance: Phillip Supino, Community Development Director Haley Hart, Long Range Planner Kevin Rayes, Planner Kate Johnson, Assistant City Attorney Cindy Klob, Records Manager COMMISSIONER COMMENTS Ms. McGovern wanted to welcome the new members but will wait until the next meeting. STAFF COMMENTS Mr. Supino introduced himself and said he was sitting in for Ms. Simon. PUBLIC COMMENTS None APPROVAL OF MINUTES Mr. McKnight motioned to approve the minutes for April 5, 2022. Mr. Rose seconded the motion. Ms. McGovern requested a roll call: Ms. Rockhill, yes; Ms. Benedetti, yes; Mr. Rose, yes; Mr. McKnight, yes; and Ms. McGovern, yes; for a total of five (5) in favor – zero (0) not in favor. The motion passed. DECLARATION OF CONFLICT OF INTEREST Ms. Benedetti stated she was a member of ACES. Ms. Johnson asked if she was on the board or just a regular member. Ms. Benedetti replied she is a general member. Ms. Johnson then asked her if she was associated with ACES in any way that she may benefit financially, and Ms. Benedetti’s response was no. Ms. Johnson then asked the other commission if they were members. Ms. McGovern stated she is a member and does not benefit financially from her membership. Ms. Johnson did not see being a member a conflict for this hearing. PUBLIC HEARINGS Aspen Center for Environmental Studies (ACES): Minor Amendment to a Planned Development – Detailed Review and Final Commercial Design Review to make site improvement for vehicular and pedestrian access and to expand the Visitor Center and Bird of Prey Buildings Ms. McGovern asked if notice had been provided. Ms. Johnson responded legal notice had been sufficiently provided within the code requirements for both items on the agenda. 3 Minutes Aspen Planning and Zoning Commission May 17, 2022 Page 2 of 7 Ms. Johnson noted she will need to step away from the meeting at 5:30. She described the options for the board should a legal issue arise. Ms. McGovern then opened the hearing and turned to floor over to staff. Mr. Kevin Rayes provided an overview of the application. He stated this is the second step of a two-step application. The applicant wants to reroute the road to the entrance to create a turnaround space and expand Bird of Prey building and the Visitor Center. The conceptual design was reviewed and approved by P&Z in 2021. Ms. McGovern then turned the floor over to the applicant. Mr. Ryan Walterscheid, Forum Phi, introduced himself along with Chris Lane, CEO of ACES, and Jim Kravitz, Naturalist Programs Director of ACES. He also introduced Lori Gerety and Libby Hartmann of Forum Phi who are on the applicant’s team. Mr. Walterscheid displayed an aerial view of Aspen and pointed out the location of the ACES property. He then displayed a site plan and described the location of the entrance. He then displayed a tree restoration plan and stated there will be a considerable amount of tree restoration in relation to the project. He stated Mr. Kravitz has been working with the City’s Parks Department. He pointed out an area highlighted in red and stated this is the area near the entrance on Puppy St. that will be most impacted. He displayed a picture of the entrance as it exists currently. He stated there is some overlap with a City Project on the Jennie Adair Wetlands which was constructed by the City but resides on ACES property. He displayed a site plan of the existing entrance and pointed out the location of the entrance and the wetlands. He stated the applicant proposes to provide a turnaround and impacting the area just to the north of the city right-of-way (ROW). He then displayed a site plan of the proposed entrance with the turnaround which was designed to accommodate the turning radius of a school bus with the smallest impact possible. He stated the center of the turnaround will maintain a transformer, other utilities, and a large cottonwood tree. He then pointed out where the largest portion of the tree mitigation will occur. Some trees will be removed due to their health and others will be removed because they will be impacted by the turnaround. Next, he displayed a diagram showing the turning radius for a school bus in the turnaround as requested by P&Z during the conceptual review. Several options were discussed with the engineering department and this plan was the one staff felt impacted the area the least. He then pointed out the new sidewalk and stated an easement will be platted and recorded. Mr. Walterscheid then displayed a picture of the existing visitor’s center. He said the office spaces near the presentation hall will be expanded. He pointed out the location of the space and noted the accessibility to the space will be enhanced. He said the materials will match what currently exists on the structure. He displayed a rendering of the new proposed addition. He also stated the application includes a renovation of the deck area off the back of the building. He displayed a picture of the existing back of the building and a rendering of the renovated deck which will include accessibility improvements. Mr. Walterscheid next displayed a picture of the existing Bird of Prey building and a rendering of the proposed dormers on the building. He added the dormers would maintain the metal roof as well as the horizontal siding. Ms. McGovern asked if anyone had questions of the applicant. Ms. McGovern asked if the existing parking would remain with the new design of the entrance. 4 Minutes Aspen Planning and Zoning Commission May 17, 2022 Page 3 of 7 Mr. Walterscheid stated the design focused on the turnaround space. He stated there is still room for parallel parking on Puppy Smith St and overflow parking exists further down the road. Mr. Kravitz stated they know when the buses are arriving so they can utilize the space as needed. Ms. McGovern then turned it over to staff. Mr. Kevin Rayes then provided a definition of the reviews for this hearing. He stated the minor amendment to a planned development for detail review and final commercial design review. The conceptual plan development, growth management review, stream margin review, and conceptual commercial design review were approved last year. Mr. Rayes displayed a map showing the location of the property and then described the property. He then displayed a site plan of the existing site and pointed out the locations to be modified by the application. Mr. Rayes then displayed a photo of the existing entrance. He stated it is quite confusing entrance and can be dangerous when it becomes congested with vehicles. He displayed a site plan showing both the existing entrance and the proposed entrance with the new roundabout. He then reviewed the recent history in the design options for the roundabout and the final design. He pointed out the location of a new sidewalk. He also noted the proximity of the new roundabout and that it will not be located in the wetlands. The city has stormwater infrastructure in the wetlands. Mr. Rayes stated staff has included a condition to the approval in the resolution which requires a public access easement to be recorded. A deadline has also been identified to be completed by September 1, 2022. Mr. Rayes next discussed the expansion to the other buildings. He explained the enhancements and expansions to the Birds of Prey and Visitor Center buildings. He displayed pictures of the existing conditions. Mr. Rayes then discusses the review criteria as included in the agenda packet. He discussed the planned development of the Detailed Review regarding the pedestrian, bicycle, and transit facilities. He stated staff has found this criteria have been met. It will be an improvement to the existing conditions by clarifying the space to be used by pedestrians and vehicles to avoid conflicts. He next discussed the criteria related to the Final Commercial Design Review. He noted the bulk of the materials had been reviewed during the Conceptual Commercial Design Review. The applicant indicated they will be using materials and patterns on the building enhancements and expansions similar to what is on the existing structures. He then discussed the landscape and lighting plans and stated the application meets the requirements. He noted the applicant will exceed the mitigation requirement for the tree removal and have a very robust plan. He closed stating staff recommends approval of the Planned Development – Detailed Review and the Final Commercial Design Review subject to the conditions in the resolution. Ms. McGovern then asked if there any questions for staff. There were none so she then opened for public comment. There was no comment from the public, so she closed that portion of the hearing. 5 Minutes Aspen Planning and Zoning Commission May 17, 2022 Page 4 of 7 She then opened for commissioner deliberation. Ms. Benedetti stated she was not involved with the conceptual review of the application, but she feels everything looks good to her. She feels it’s a well thought out application. Ms. Rockhill agreed with Ms. Benedetti. Mr. Rose is set to approve the application with staff’s conditions. Mr. McKnight agreed with the others. He thinks it’s in line with the conceptual review. Ms. McGovern feels based on the staff presentation; the review criteria has been met for the reviews. She only remembered the tree mitigation being of some concern in the conceptual review and the applicant is now proposing to exceed the mitigation requirements, so she thinks it is fine. Mr. Walterscheid asked Mr. Rayes about the condition regarding the easement to be completed by a specific date. He does not recall a specific date. They have been working with Ms. April Long of the City and will work with the city to complete the easement by the date specified. He asked what the repercussions if the easement is not completed by then and feels it is more on the city to complete it instead of the client. Mr. Rayes responded Council decided this date was reasonable and he feels there is room to work on good faith to meet the date without going back to City Council to ask for another date. He would want to confirm this with the City Attorney. Mr. Supino stated as long as there is progress being made, there should not be any issue. Mr. Walterscheid stated they have been working with Ms. Long and ACES wants to move forward with the project. Mr. Supino stated his department will help coordinate the activities to ensure everything is completed on time. Mr. Lane asked if the language could be changed in the resolution to memorialize what staff has said regarding working in good faith. Mr. Rayes stated they can’t modify the language in the resolution because it was approved by Council. He stated he would agree to remove it. He stated even if it is not done, ACES should be able to continue to move forward and apply for a building permit. Mr. Rose motioned to approve Resolution #9, Series 2022 with the conditions listed by staff. Mr. Rose amended his motion to include the minor amendment to the planned development, detailed review, and final commercial design review to make various changes to the property including site improvements, reconfiguring vehicle and pedestrian access and the expansion of the visitor center and birds of prey building. Ms. Rockhill seconded the motion. Ms. McGovern requested a roll call: Ms. Rockhill, yes; Ms. Benedetti, yes; Mr. Rose, yes; Mr. McKnight, yes; and Ms. McGovern, yes; for a total of five (5) in favor – zero (0) not in favor. The motion passed. Ms. McGovern thanked the applicant and closed the hearing. 6 Minutes Aspen Planning and Zoning Commission May 17, 2022 Page 5 of 7 OTHER BUSINESS Discussion of and Recommendation to Council on Short-Term Rental Regulations Ordinance #009, Series 2022 Ms. McGovern proceeded to the next agenda item and turned the floor over to staff. Mr. Rose noted he will need to leave the meeting in approximately ten minutes. Mr. Supino introduced himself and Ms. Haley Hart, Long Range Planner. He stated staff wants to review the proposed ordinance to amend the short-term rental regulations. Mr. Supino reviewed the 11 year history of the Short-Term Rental (STR) program and the direction from City Council to amend the code section since the moratorium took effect on December 8, 2021. He noted the proposed code amendments are being presented to P&Z for their review and comment. Mr. Supino then reviewed the moratorium timeline, noting it is scheduled to terminate on August 8, 2022. He displayed the six STR best practice related topics reviewed with Council including zoning, permitting, life safety, financials, operational standards, and enforcement. Staff analyzed the City’s program with those of other communities. He stated Council’s primary objectives were to support the existing bed base with some STR activity, to protect and enhance local neighborhood character, and to mitigate the costs of STRs on the community. He further described the types of costs. Ms. Rockhill stated she has a hard time understanding the statement that STRs bringing more people and creating more emissions when if the homes were occupied by homeowners, they would be creating emissions as well. She feels the trips taken by the STR people are in lieu of those that would be taken by homeowners. Mr. Supino stated from an emissions standpoint, the building is there in both instances. He added if it’s vacant, there are lower emissions and in terms of visitors, they have a carbon profile which have emissions associated with their activities during their visit. He stated their analysis shows approximately 3,000 bedrooms have been added to the lodging inventory over the last decade through STRs and those bedrooms are occupied approximately 37% of the time. He stated the presence of these additional bedrooms has added to the emissions profile of the community. Ms. Rockhill stated she doesn’t necessarily agree. She added STRs have always existed in Aspen, not just the past decade and have only been studied in past couple of years. She asked about the impacts to local employment and local businesses. Mr. Supino stated they do not have the analysis breaking out STRs from the larger lodging sector. He added having regulations will allow for the collection of data to future analysis. He stated proposed modifications would not reduce the number of STRs initially. It would freeze the number and allow for a 25% reduction over time recognizing the economic importance of STRs. Ms. Rockhill stated then any new economic activity will be in the hotels and driving more to the commercial direction and not spreading it across different platforms in town. She feels in regards to reducing emissions, there is a lax regulations for hotels in her experience. She noted lights, TVs and fireplaces are on all day and she feels it would be easier for the city to address this. Mr. Supino then discussed how they have proceeded with the process of identifying potential changes to the code including a technical advisory committee including 12 individuals from the STR and lodging industry, tourist economy and interested residents. Staff and the committee developed a case study by analyzing 10 destination communities in the intermountain west to see how they have addressed STRs in the past 5-7 years. He stated they also worked with industry consulting experts as well to engaged with the public. He then reviewed the code sections outlining the standards P&Z should follow with their review and recommendation to Council regarding the proposed changes 7 Minutes Aspen Planning and Zoning Commission May 17, 2022 Page 6 of 7 Ms. Hart then walked through some of the details of proposed ordinance based on the review of best practices from other communities. She stated the ordinances includes regulations regarding greater accountability, impact mitigation, lodging support, neighborhood character and data collection. Next, she reviewed the types of permits included in the proposed ordinance. Ms. Benedetti asked if staff had an estimate of how many owner-occupied STRs currently exist. Ms. Hart responded the city doesn’t currently have the numbers, but they estimated to be 60% lodge- 40% individual units. They hope to gather data over the next year. Mr. McKnight asked the difference between the Owner-Occupied permit type and the STR Classic permit type is that the STR Classic is capped. Ms. Hart confirmed this. Ms. Rockhill asked if there will continue to be 1,300 permits, but there will actually be more because the owner-occupied permits will no be included in the 1,300 cap. Ms. Hart replied this was a possibility. Mr. Supino clarified if you are a current permit holder, you will be able to continue to get a permit until you decide to stop. Ms. Rockhill feels the STR Classic is more common than the owner-occupied STR permit and asked how each type would pay fees. Mr. Supino stated the proposed fee structure includes a base fee plus an affordable housing fee based on the number of bedrooms. Ms. Hart next reviewed how zoning will impact the STR caps. There will be a cap on STRs in residential zones. There will not be caps on owner-occupied STRs, and commercial and lodge zones zoned properties. She reiterated if a residential zone currently has 100 permits it will be reduced to 75% through non-transferability and other enforcement actions resulting in a revocation of the license. Once the limit has been reached, a wait list will be managed. Ms. Rockhill asked if there would be a requirement for applicants to work with a local realtor or management service. Ms. Hart replied the owner may designate someone as a qualified owner’s representative. Mr. Hart then reviewed the occupancy and operations requirements. Ms. Benedetti noted those travelling with children may need the +2 instead of the +1. Ms. Hart next reviewed the good neighbor policies possibly including a guide in every unit and added that ACRA has drafted a guideline. Ms. Benedetti feels an email sent out when a short-term rental has been reserved are very helpful to provide information. Mr. Supino asked Ms. Rockhill if there was an opportunity on the broker side to provide this type of information. She responded they provide a welcome letter, meet the people at check-in to go over essential information. They also have books with recommendations for food and activity. She noted she has heard of some management companies renting out Aspen properties and the company has never been to Aspen. She feels having a local representative is important to success. Ms. Hart then discussed the proposed active enforcement process including a 3 strike rule, inspections, complaint process and a use it or loose it policy. Mr. McKnight asked what counts as a strike. Mr. Supino stated there not be any anonymous complaints allowed and a staff member will be assigned to monitor the situation to determine if it is a civil complaint or a violation of the STR regulations. Ms. Hart added there will also be an appeal process. Mr. McKnight doesn’t’ want to see the city primarily using the 3 strike rule to reduce the number of permits. 8 Minutes Aspen Planning and Zoning Commission May 17, 2022 Page 7 of 7 Mr. Supino then reviewed taxes and fees noting Council was very interested in having fees and tax question to the electorate. He then discussed the regulatory and a per bedroom affordable housing fees and the excise and sales tax which would happen as a property is purchased. Ms. Rockhill feels tying affordable housing to STRs is a bit of a mismatch and more appropriate for a climate fee which would be creating a greater impact. Mr. Supino believes the tax question may help address the climate, transit and pedestrian, policing, and affordable housing impacts. Ms. Hart stated it will take more employees to travel and service individual STRs versus a traditional hotel. As the number of STRs increase in the residential district, it may be taking away long-term rentals, so it decreases supply as the demand increases. She noted Breckenridge has an interesting report supporting their affordable housing fee and the city will produce a similar report. Ms. Rockhill asked if it would be possible to pull in climate policies for the larger exempt STR permits. She provided examples of restricting plastic bottles and encourage composting. Mr. McKnight would like to see a big effort from the city regarding the education part of it. Ms. Hart stated APCHA suggested if they show they agreed to the policies they could receive a free water bottle from a participating organization. Ms. Rockhill asked if the definition of a STR being less than 30 days. Mr. Supino confirmed this based on local, state and federal statutes. Ms. Rockhill asked staff which city was found to execute their 3 strike policy the best. Mr. Supino replied every community has different needs based on the local conditions. Ms. Hart felt Durango, Crested Butte and Glenwood Springs are doing a really great job of implementing their STR policy. She feels Aspen is similar to Breckenridge base on the sheer number of units to be reduced. Ms. McGovern asked what staff wanted from the commission at this point. Mr. Supino stated P&Z could make a motion to support or not support the ordinance. P&Z could add conditions to the recommendation. He stated the commission could also decide to not make a recommendation. They will include a summary of this discussion in their upcoming presentation to Council. Ms. Benedetti motioned to support the approval of Ordinance No. 9; Series 2022 as presented. Ms. Rockhill asked to amend the ordinance to include some accountability regarding the climate for Lodge Exempt STR permitees. After discussion between Ms. McGovern and Ms. Rockhill, Ms. Benedetti amended her motion to include adding something to draw attention to the good neighbor education campaign and including accountability regarding the climate. Mr. McKnight seconded the motion. Ms. McGovern requested a roll call for Resolution #10, Series 2022: Ms. Rockhill, yes; Ms. Benedetti, yes; Mr. McKnight, yes; and Ms. McGovern, yes; for a total of four (4) in favor – zero (0) not in favor. The motion passed. ADJOURN Mr. McKnight motioned to adjourn and was seconded by Ms. Benedetti. All in favor and the meeting was adjourned. Cindy Klob, Records Manager 9 Page | 1 MEMORANDUM TO: Aspen Planning & Zoning Commission FROM: Kevin Rayes, Planner THRU: Amy Simon, Planning Director RE: Burlingame Triangle Parcel | Major Subdivision Public Hearing MEETING DATE: September 20, 2022 Applicant: City of Aspen Representative: Robert Schultz Consulting, LLC Location: TBD, Legally Described as Lot 1A, Final Subdivision Plat of Lot 1A, Burlingame Ranch, according to the Final Plat thereof, recorded October 10, 2005, in Book 75 at Page 46 at Reception No. 515887. Current Zoning: Rural Residential (RR) and Conservation (C) Summary: The applicant is requesting a Major Subdivision to subdivide fathering parcel, Lot 1A into two resulting parcels- Lot 1A and Lot 1D (AKA “the triangle parcel”). While no development is requested as part of this land use application, Lot 1D is anticipated to become part of the future affordable housing development at the Lumberyard. A separate Planned Development application will be required when the Lumberyard Project is ready for review. The land that will continue to be referred to as Lot 1A will remain undeveloped in perpetuity. Staff Recommendation: The proposed request is intended to set aside a parcel of land (Lot 1 D) to eventually become part of the Lumberyard Affordable Housing Development. While a large portion of Lot 1A is intended for conservation, the proposed area of Lot 1D was previously identified for housing and other community needs. The request to subdivide Lot 1A is consistent with previous approvals and was originally anticipated when it was created. Staff finds the request to subdivide the parcel is consistent with all Subdivision Review Criteria and recommends that P&Z approve the attached resolution recommending approval to City Council. Figure 1: Site Location Lot 1A Lot 1D- Proposed area to be subdivided from the fathering parcel; Lot 1A Figure 1: Subject Property Location 10 Page | 2 REQUEST OF THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION: The Applicant is requesting the following recommendations of approval from the Planning and Zoning Commission. Upon receipt of a recommendation, the application will be reviewed for a final decision by City Council. • General Subdivision Review Standards (Land Use Code Section 26.480.040) All subdivisions are required to conform to general subdivision standards and limitations. Lot 1A is currently vacant and most of the site is encumbered with a conservation easement , apart from a portion of the property that was previously anticipated for future development. Subdividing Lot 1A into two parcels will set aside the area needed for future development of the Lumberyard Affordable Housing Project and will preserve the remainder of the land for conservation purposes. Given the unique context and plans for the area, many of the general subdivision review standards are not applicable. (See Exhibit A for all review criteria and staff responses.) • Major Subdivisions (Land Use Code Section 26.480.070) Lot 1A is the resulting parcel from Lot 1 which was approved for a Lot Split several years ago. Pursuant to Land Use Code Section 26.480.060, Minor Subdivisions, a Lot Split may occur only one time on a fathering parcel. A Major Subdivision is required to legally subdivide Lot 1A a second time. As previously mentioned, given the unique context and plans for the area, many of the review criteria are not applicable. Exhibit B responds to all review criteria. BACKGROUND: In 1997, The City of Aspen acquired more than 200 acres of vacant land west of town, just outside city limits. This land was annexed into the city and subdivided into the Burlingame Ranch Subdivision for the purpose of developing affordable housing and the preservation of open space. Much of the affordable housing planned for the site has been developed, apart from some areas, including a portion of Lot 1A, which is the subject of this review. When an annexation occurs, state statute requires initial zoning to be established within 90-days. When Lot 1A was annexed, two zone districts were contemplated for adoption: Residential Multi-Family (R/MFA) and Open Space (OS). Figure two depicts where this zoning was proposed. The R/MFA designation was thought to provide the density required for future development of affordable housing. Council ultimately adopted Rural Residential (RR) and Conservation (C) zoning. These zone districts were chosen to serve as a kind of place holder by “freezing” the vacant lot in its existing state with the understanding that a site-specific development plan might be adopted for the area located in RR at some point in the future, at which point the zoning could be amended to accommodate the development. RR C Figure 3: Lot 1A Current Zoning Figure 2: Zone Districts Proposed During Annexation 11 Page | 3 Today Lot 1A remains undeveloped and within the Conservation (C) and the Rural Residential (RR) zone districts. The RR portion of the parcel is roughly the same area that was previously contemplated as R/MF. In 2003, The City, and the Aspen Valley Land Trust (AVLT) approved a conservation easement on the lot. The purpose of the easement was to preserve the property as open space in perpetuity, apart from an area located along the south-western side of the lot, which was called out as “developable land.” Pursuant to the easement, the developable area is described as the following: A 150-foot-wide strip or to the toe of the slope (whichever is wider) of the Burlingame Range which adjoins Highway 82. The purpose of this description was to broadly convey th e general area that was exempted from the provisions of the conservation easemen t, meaning that development could occur within this portion of Lot 1A at some point in the future. A survey was never conducted, so the precise boundaries of the exempted area were never formally recognized. An exhibit was later recorded with an amended conservation easement to visually represent the boundary of the exempted area. Again, the exhibit was not the result of a survey or other formal site analysis, but rather represents the basic shape of land that is considered developable. This is acknowledged in the amended deed pursuant to the following: The parties understand that the City has not completed the affordable housing project currently contemplated on the land described above at section 1.iii [the subject area of this application] and therefore is unable to specifically describe the property that is to be excluded from the conservation easement. Despite the absence of a survey or a metes-and-bounds description, the location of the exempted area depicted in the conservation easement is consistent with the area previously described as a suitable location for affordable housing development when the land was originally annexe d (Figures 4 and 5). Figure 5: Shape of Lot 1A identified for development in conservation deed Figure 4: Lot 1A current configuration 12 Page | 4 Following the initial acquisition and subdivision of Burlingame Ranch, The City gradually acquired and annexed additional property from the surrounding area. In December 2007, The City purchased the Lumberyard Facility (AKA BMC West), to develop affordable housing. The City annexed the property from the County and adopted an initial zoning of Service/Commercial/Industrial (S/CI) to “freeze” the existing use and allow normal operations to continue until a final development plan could be executed. This property remains under City ownership and continues to function as an industrial-based use. In 2020, The City purchased the mini-storage facility. The City annexed this property in early 2022. Upon annexation, The City adopted an initial zoning of S/CI, also to allow normal operations to continue until a final redevelopment plan could be executed. This property remains under City ownership and continues to function as an industrial-based use. As represented in Figure 6, the Mini Storage site, the Lumberyard and the Triangle Parcel are located adacent to one another. PROJECT SUMMARY: The applicant requests to subdivide Lot 1A to set aside a portion of the property in anticipation of the Lumberyard Affordable Housing Development. While this application does not request any development, subdividing the property is needed before a master plan can be considered. Lot 1A is currently just over 73 acres. As represented in Figure 7, the applicant proposes to separate 3.56 acres from the fathering parcel to create Lot 1D. The resulting parcel will be located within the Rural Residential (RR) and Conservation (C) zone districts. The General Subdivision Review Standards prescribed in Land Use Code Section 26.480.040 prohibit a single lot from being in more than one zone district, unless unique circumstances exist. Given the anticipated request to adopt a master plan for the Lumberyard Affordable Housing Project, the applicant believes that no change to existing zoning is immediately needed. Figure 6: City-Owned Properties Slated for Affordable Housing Development Lot 1D Figure 7: Proposed subdivision layout of fathering parcel Lot 1A and resulting parcel Lot 1D Lot 1A Burlingame Ranch 13 Page | 5 STAFF COMMENTS: When reviewing the request to subdivide Lot 1A, staff first considered the history of the property and the record that was established relating to the “triangle parcel.” The idea of developing affordable housing within this area was conceptualized when the Burlingame property was originally acquired by The City in the late 1990s. At the time of annexation, Lot 1D was contemplated for Residential Multi -Family zoning to establish the density required for feasible future affordable housing development (Figure 2). Although no legal description was memorialized, the same general area was excluded from the restrictions and provisions of the conservation easement that encumbers Lot 1A so that future development could occur (Figures 4 & 5). On June 9, 2022, the Aspen Valley Land Trust Board of Directors adopted a resolution to acknowledge the absence of a formal land description from previous deeds and to memorialize a legal description that precisely describe s the boundaries of Lot 1D and Lot 1A. The resolution approved by the AVLT Board of Directors and associated documents are included in Exhibit C. Pending approval of this application, a plat representing both parcels will be recorded with the Pitkin County Clerk and Recorder . Staff believes the request to subdivide Lot 1A to create resulting Lot 1D is consistent with the general record and history that has been established for this property as well as the resolution adopted by the AVLT Board of Directors . Upon making this determination, staff then analyzed the subdivision review criteria that apply to the request. When a subdivision occurs, several review criteria are required to be met to ensure the orderly and efficient development of the city. Because the scope of this application is limited to the separation of Lot 1D from fathering parcel Lot 1A and no developm ent is proposed, many of the criteria are not applicable. (All review criteria are listed with staff responses in Exhibits A & B.) The land use code prohibits the creation of non -conformities or the expansion of existing non- conformities as the result of a subdivision. As previously mentioned, Lot 1D is currently vacant. Because no development is proposed, the creation of non -conformities is a non-issue. Providing guaranteed legal access from all resulting parcels to a public way is required. The application proposes an easement over and across the adjacent city -owned Lumberyard properties to access Lot 1D. Because the Lumberyard properties are anticipated to become part of the same affordable housing development, staff believes placing the access easement on those properties is appropriate. Pending approval of this application, the easement will be recorded with the Pitkin County Clerk and Recorder. When a development application is submitted, a traffic circulation study will be required along with additio nal details related to vehicular access, and pedestrian/bicycle access. The Planning & Zoning Commission will have an opportunity to review those details at that time. Lastly, the land use code generally discourages placing resulting parcels in more than one zone district, unless unique circumstances exist. The proposed layout of Lot 1D would be in the Rural Residential (RR) and the Conservation (C) zone districts. This is no different than the existing configuration of fathering parcel Lot 1A, which is cu rrently located in both zone districts. Because of the limited information available regarding the density, height, mass, and other characteristics of future development, rezoning the resulting parcel at this stage would be premature. Staff believes that maintaining existing zoning is appropriate as it will “freeze” current conditions until a development application is submitted. A rezoning request would be considered at that time. Staff recommends that the Planning & Zoning Commission take the opportunity to assess potential zoning options when an application for development is submitted in the future. 14 Page | 6 As represented in Figure 8, Lot 1D is located adjacent to The City-owned Lumberyard and Mini -Storage facilities. These properties were acquired and annexed by The City with the goal of developing an affordable housing project. The acquisition and annexation of land by The City has occurred in a piecemeal fashion over the last decade. Lot 1D is the final piece of land that is needed to develop a successful project. Staff finds that all Subdivision review criteria are met. Staff supports the request to subdivid e Lot 1A and recommends approval of the request. RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends the Planning and Zoning Commission (P&Z) adopt the attached Resolution recommending approval of the request to subdivide Lot 1A. ATTACHMENTS: Resolution #___, Series of 2022 Exhibit A – Subdivision General Review Standards Exhibit B – Major Subdivision Review Standards Exhibit C – Letter from AVLT and Entitlement Documents Exhibit D – Application Lumberyard Facility Lot 1D Lot 1A Figure 8: Proposed Subdivision Layout of Fathering Parcel Lot 1A and Resulting Parcel Lot 1D Mini Storage Facility 15 P&Z Resolution #XX, Series of 2022 Page 1 of 3 RESOLUTION #XX (SERIES OF 2022) A RESOLUTION OF THE ASPEN PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION RECOMMENDING APPROVAL FOR A MAJOR SUBDIVISION FOR THE PROPERTY LEGALLY DESCRIBED AS LOT 1A, FINAL SUBDIVISION PLAT OF LOT 1A, BURLINGAME RANCH, ACCORDING TO THE FINAL PLAT THEREOF, RECORDED OCTOBER 10, 2005, IN BOOK 75 AT PAGE 46 AT RECEPTION NO. 515997, COUNTY OF PITKIN, STATE OF COLORADO Parcel ID: 2735-031-00-805 WHEREAS, the Community Development Department received an application from the City of Aspen, 427 Rio Grande Pl. Aspen, CO 81611 c/o Sara Ott, City Manager, requesting approval for a Major Subdivision for the property located at Burlingame Lot 1A; and, WHEREAS, the Community Development Department Staff reviewed the application for compliance with the applicable review standards; and, WHEREAS, upon review of the application and the applicable Land Use Code standards, the Community Development Director recommended approval of the Major Subdivision; and, WHEREAS, the City of Aspen Planning and Zoning Commission reviewed and considered the development proposal under the applicable provisions of the Municipal Code as identified herein, reviewed and considered the recommendation of the Community Development Director and took and considered public comment at a duly noticed public hearing on September 20, 2022; and, WHEREAS, the City of Aspen Planning and Zoning Commission finds that the development proposal meets the applicable review criteria and that approval of the request is consistent with the goals and objectives of the Land Use Code; and, WHEREAS, the City of Aspen Planning and Zoning Commission finds that this Resolution furthers and is necessary for the promotion of public health, safety, and welfare, and, WHEREAS, the City of Aspen Planning and Zoning Commission approves Resolution #XX, Series of 2022, by a X to X (X-X) vote, granting approval of the Major Subdivision as identified herein. 16 P&Z Resolution #XX, Series of 2022 Page 2 of 3 NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED by the Aspen Planning and Zoning Commission: Section 1: Major Subdivision: Pursuant to the procedures and standards set forth in Title 26 of the Aspen Municipal Code, the Planning and Zoning Commission hereby approves the request for a Major Subdivision to subdivide Lot 1A to create resulting parcel Lot 1A and Lot 1D, subject to the following conditions: 1. A Subdivision Plat shall be reviewed and recorded in the office of the Pitkin County Clerk and Recorder, pursuant to Chapter 26.490 – Approval Documents. No Development Agreement is required at this time. 2. The Subdivision Plat shall represent the access easement serving Lot 1D and the easement shall be recorded with the Pitkin County Clerk and Recorder’s Office. Section 2: Material Representations All material representations and commitments made by the Applicant pursuant to the development proposal approvals as herein awarded, whether in public hearing or documentation presented before the Planning and Zoning Commission, are hereby incorporated in such site development approvals and the same shall be complied with as if fully set forth herein, unless amended by an authorized entity. Section 3: Existing Litigation This resolution shall not affect any existing litigation and shall not operate as an abatement of any action or proceeding now pending under or by virtue of the ordinances repealed or amended as herein provided, and the same shall be conducted and concluded under such prior ordinances. Section 4: Severability If any section, subsection, sentence, clause, phrase, or portion of this resolution is for any reason held invalid or unconstitutional in a court of competent jurisdiction, such portion shall be deemed a separate, distinct, and independent provision and shall not affect the validity of the remaining portions thereof. APPROVED by the Commission at its meeting on September 20, 2022. APPROVED AS TO FORM: PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION: ___________________________________ ________________________ Katharine Johnson, Assistant City Attorney Teraissa McGovern, Chair 17 P&Z Resolution #XX, Series of 2022 Page 3 of 3 ATTEST: ____________________________ Cindy Klob, Records Manager 18 Exhibit A Subdivision – General Review Standards Page | 1 Sec. 26.480.040. - General subdivision review standards. All subdivisions shall be required to conform to the following general standards and limitations in addition to the specific standards applicable to each type of subdivision: a) Guaranteed Access to a Public Way. All subdivided lots must have perpetual unobstructed legal vehicular access to a public way. A proposed subdivision shall not eliminate or obstruct legal vehicular access from a public way to an adjacent property. All streets in a Subdivision retained under private ownership shall be dedicated to public use to ensure adequate public and emergency access. Security/privacy gates across access points and driveways are prohibited. Staff findings: Lot 1D is located adjacent to the City-owned lumberyard properties. This application includes a public access easement across the lumberyard properties, which would provide the right -of-way access required pursuant to this criterion. Pending approval of the request to subdivide Lot 1A, the access easement will be recorded. When a housing plan is submitted, a more robust access plan, traffic study and road design will be required. Staff finds this criterion to be met. b) Alignment with Original Townsite Plat. The proposed lot lines shall approximate, to the extent practical, the platting of the Original Aspen Townsite, and additions thereto, as applicable to the subject land. Minor deviations from the original platting lines to accommodate significant features of the site may be approved. Staff findings: This property was never part of the original townsite. Staff finds this criterion to be not applicable. c) Zoning Conformance. All new lots shall conform to the requirements of the zone district in which the property is situated, including va riations and variances approved pursuant to this Title. A single lot shall not be located in more than one zone district unless unique circumstances dictate. A rezoning application may be considered concurrently with subdivision review. Staff findings: Lot 1A is currently located within the Rural Residential (RR) and Conservation (C) zone districts. The application to subdivide Lot 1A does not include a request to change current zoning. The lot currently complies with zoning as no improvements exist. No development is proposed as part of the subdivision, so resulting parcel Lot 1D will also comply with underlying zoning , despite being located within two zone districts. An application will eventually be submitted to develop affordable housing on Lot 1D, at which a rezoning request would be appropriate. Staff finds this criterion to be met. 19 Exhibit A Subdivision – General Review Standards Page | 2 d) Existing Structures, Uses, and Non -Conformities. A subdivision shall not create or increase the non -conformity of a use, structure or parcel. A rezoning application or other mechanism to correct the non -conforming nature of a use, structure, or parcel may be considered concurrently. In the case where an existing structure or use occupies a site eligible for subdivision, the structure need not be demolished and the use need not be discontinued prior to application for subdivision. If approval of a subdivision creates a non -conforming structure or use, including a structure spanning a parcel boundary, such structure or use may continue until recordation of the subdivision plat. Alternatively, the City may accept certain assurance that the non -conformities will be remedied after recordati on of the subdivision plat. Such assurances shall be reflected in a development agreement or other legal mechanism acceptable to the City Attorney and may be time -bound or secured with a financial surety. Staff findings: There are no structures or other re lated improvements on Lot 1A. Pending approval of subdivision, resulting parcel Lot 1 D will also not contain any improvements. No development is proposed as part of this application so non - conformities are not anticipated. A request to develop affordable housing will likely include a request to rezone Lot 1D to ensure compliance with underlying zoning. 20 Exhibit B Subdivision – Major Subdivision Review Standards Page | 1 Sec. 26.480.070. - Major subdivisions. The following subdivisions shall be approved, approved with conditions, or denied by the City Council, after receiving a recommendation from the Planning and Zoning Commission. Major subdivisions are subject to Section 26.480.030—Procedures for Review, the standards and limitations of Section 26.480.040—General Subdivision Review Standards, and the standards and limitations of each type of subdivision, described below. All subdivisions not defined as administrative or minor subdivisions shall be considered major subdivisions. a. Land Subdivision. The division or aggregation of land for the purpose of creating individual lots or parcels shall be approved, approved with conditions, or denied according to the following standards: 1. The proposed subdivision complies with the requirements of Section 26.480.040—General Subdivision Review Standards. Staff findings: The General Subdivision Review Standards are either met or not applicable (depending upon the criterion). The staff findings for the General Subdivision Review Standards are provided in Exhibit A. Staff finds this criterion to be met. 2. The proposed subdivision enables an efficient pattern of development that optimizes the use of the limited amount of land available for development. Staff findings: Most of Lot 1A is encumbered with a conservation easement for the purpose of maintaining open space. The area proposed for subdivision (Lot 1D) from the fathering parcel was previously contemplated for the development of affordable housing and was thus explicitly exempted in the conservation easement. Subdividing Lot 1D from fathering parcel Lot 1A is consistent with previous approvals and will optimize the use of land. Staff finds this criterion to be met. 3. The proposed subdivision preserves important geologic features, mature vegetation, and structures or features of the site that have historic, cultural, visual, or ecological importance or contribute to the identity of the town. Staff findings: Lot 1A is currently just over 73 acres. The request to subdivide the property to create Lot 1D will separate 3.56 acres from the fathering parcel. The conservation easement memorialized on the Lot 1A will continue to preserve most of the parcel from development in perpetuity. Staff finds this criterion to be met. 4. The proposed subdivision prohibits development on land unsuitable for development because of natural or man -made hazards affecting the property, including flooding, mudflow, debris flow, fault ruptures, landslides, rock or soil creep, rock falls, rock slides, mining activity including mine waste deposit, avalanche or snow slide areas, slopes in excess of thirty percent (30%), and any other natural or man-made hazard or condition that could harm the health, 21 Exhibit B Subdivision – Major Subdivision Review Standards Page | 2 safety, or welfare of the community. Affected areas may be accepted as suitable for development if adequate mitigation techniques acceptable to the City Engineer are proposed in compliance with Title 29—Engineering Design Standards. Conceptual plans for mitigation techniques may be accepted with specific design details and timing of implementation address ed through a Development Agreement pursuant to Chapter 26.490—Approval Documents. Staff findings: No development is proposed as part of t he request to subdivide Lot 1A. When a subsequent application is submitted to develop affordable housing on resulting parcel Lot 1D, the development will be subject to the provisions of the City of Aspen Land Use Code, Engineering Code and Parks code to ensure the development meets all provisions related to natural or man-made hazards that might affect the property. Staff finds this criterion to be not applicable. 5. There has been accurate identification of engineering design and mitigation techniques necessary for development of the proposed subdivision to comply with the applicable requirements of Municipal Code Title 29 - Engineering Design Standards and the City of Aspen Urban Runoff Management Plan (URMP). The City Engineer may require specific designs, mitigation techniques, and implementation timelines be defined and documented within a Development Agreement. Staff findings: No development is proposed as part of this application. Subsequent development will be required to meet all Engineering design standards. Staff finds this criterion to be not applicable. 6. The proposed subdivision shall upgrade public infrastructure and facilities necessary to serve the subdivision. Improvements shall be at the sole cost of the developer. Staff findings: No development is proposed as part of this application. Necessary public infrastructure and utilities will be analyzed at the time a development application is considered. Staff finds this criterion to be not applicable . 7. The proposed subdivision is exempt from or has been granted all growth management approvals pursuant to Chapter 26.470 —Growth Management Quota System, including compliance with all affordable housing requirements for new and replacement development as applicable. Staff findings: While the development of an affordable housing project is anticipated in the future, no development is proposed as part of this application . Pursuant to Table 2 of Land Use Code Section 26.470.040, no annual limit of development allotments exists for residential affordable housing. Staff finds this criterion to be met. 22 Exhibit B Subdivision – Major Subdivision Review Standards Page | 3 8. The proposed subdivision meets the School Land Dedication requirements of Chapter 26.620 and any land proposed for dedication meets the criteria for land acceptance pursuant to said Chapter. Staff findings: No development is proposed in this application. A future application to develop affordable housing will address School Land Dedication requirements. Staff finds this criterion to be not applicable. 9. A Subdivision Plat shall be reviewed and recorded in the of fice of the Pitkin County Clerk and Recorder, pursuant to Chapter 26.490—Approval Documents. Staff findings : The application includes a draft Subdivision Plat that depicts fathering Parcel Lot 1A along with resulting Parcel Lot 1D. The application also includes a public access easement that addresses access from the adjacent city-owned Lumberyard facility to su bject parcel Lot 1D. Pending approval from City Council, these documents will be filed with the County Clerk and Recorder. Staff finds this criterion to be met. 10. A Development Agreement shall be reviewed and recorded in the office of the Pitkin County Clerk and Recorder, pursuant to Chapter 26.490—Approval Documents. Staff findings: No development is proposed as part of this application. Future development will require a Development Agreement. Staff finds this criterion to be not applicable. b. Vehicular Rights -of-Way. The dedication, boundary alteration, realignment, or any partial or whole vacation of a Street, Alley, or other vehicular right -of-way serving more than one (1) parcel, shall be approved, approved with conditions, or denied according to the following standards: 1. The proposed change maintains or improves the publi c health, safety, and welfare of the community and is in the best interests of the City of Aspen. Staff findings: While this application does not propose changing any vehicular rights -of-way, a public access easement running over and across the adjacent Lumberyard property to the subject parcel has been included with the request. The public access easement provides the guarantee that access to Lot 1D will be maintained. A more robust plan for vehicular access and traffic circulation will be required when a subsequent application is submitted to develop affordable housing. Staff finds this criterion to be not applicable. 2. The proposed change to the public rights -of-way maintains or improves safe physical and legal access from a public way to all adjacent properties and shall not restrict the ability for a property to develop by eliminating or hindering access. Redundant access, such as a primary street access plus alley access, is preferred. 23 Exhibit B Subdivision – Major Subdivision Review Standards Page | 4 Staff findings: The access easement included with the application guarantees that access to Lot 1D will be maintained. No other changes are proposed at this time. Staff finds this criterion to be not applicable. 3. The design of the proposed change complies with Municipal Code Title 29— Engineering Design Standards and is consistent with applicable adopted policies, plans, and approved projects for the area (such as a highway access policy, an approved development project, an infrastructure plan, a trails plan, an improvement district plan, and the like). Staff findings: The development is proposed as part of this application. Therefore, Engineering Standards related to vehicul ar access, pedestrian access and other related requirements are not needed. These standards will apply when an application to develop affordable housing is submitted. Staff finds this criterion to be not applicable. 4. The proposed change maintains or impro ves normal traffic circulation, traffic control capabilities, access by emergency and service vehicles, pedestrian and bike connections, drainage infrastructure, street and infrastructure maintenance needs, and normal operating needs of the City including snow removal. Staff findings: The proposed access easement provides the legal means necessary to accommodate emergency vehicles to the subject parcel if needed. However, no development is proposed on Lot 1D so issues related to traffic circulation, traffic control, pedestrian and bike connections are not applicable at this time. Staff finds this criterion to be not applicable. 5. For all new rights -of-way and physical changes to existing rights -of-way, the applicant shall design and construct the proposed right -of-way improvements according to the design and construction standards of the City Engineer. Upon completion, the right-of-way improvements shall be subject to inspection and acceptance by the City Engineer. The City may require a performance warranty. The requirements of this crit erion shall be reflected in a Development Agreement. Staff findings: Pending submission of a subsequent application for development, all Engineering standards related to right -of-way improvements shall be met. Staff finds this criterion to be not applicable. 6. For partial or full vacation of existing rights -of-way, the applicant shall demonstrate the right -of-way, or portion thereof, has no current or future use to the community as a vehicular way, pedestrian or bike way, utility corridor, drainage corridor, or recreational connection due to dimensions, location, topography, existing or proposed development, or other similar circumstances. The City shall consider whether the interests of the applican t and the City can be achieved through a "closure" of the right -of-way. 24 Exhibit B Subdivision – Major Subdivision Review Standards Page | 5 Staff findings: There is no request to vacate any existing right -of-way. Staff finds this criterion to be not applicable. 7. A Right-of-Way Dedication/Vacation Plat shall be reviewed and recorded in the office of the Pitkin County Clerk and Recorder, pursuant to Chapter 26.490—Approval Documents. The plat shal l demonstrate how the lands underlying vacated rights -of-way shall accrue to adjacent parcels in compliance with State Statute. Staff findings: The applicable includes a public access easement over and across the adjacent Lumberyard facility to the subject Lot. Pending approval of this application, the easement will be recorded with the Pitkin County Clerk and Recorder. Additional plats may be req uired related to traffic circulation, and pedestrian/bicycle access when an application is reviewed for development. Staff finds this criterion to be met. 8. A Development Agreement shall be reviewed and recorded in the office of the Pitkin County Clerk and Recorder, pursuant to Chapter 26.490—Approval Documents. This requirement may be waived if no right -of-way construction is proposed. Staff findings: No development is proposed in this application. Pending a submission of an application to develop the subject parcel, a Development Agreement will be required. Staff finds this criterion to be not applicable. 25 Exhibit C | AVLT Letter and Entitlement Docs 26 1/4 CORNER SECTIONS 2 & 3 BA S I S O F B E A R I N G S N0 6 ° 1 0 ' 4 9 " E 4 0 5 . 1 6 ' N0 0 ° 5 6 ' 3 1 " E 3 8 4 . 5 8 ' N 1 3 ° 2 4 ' 4 9 " W 3 5 3 . 9 7 ' N0 1 ° 1 2 ' 2 1 " E 2 6 2 . 2 1 ' N0 1 ° 1 8 ' 4 2 " W 4 2 4 . 7 6 ' L1 L 2 L3 S0 4 ° 3 6 ' 3 7 " W 2 5 6 . 4 9 ' S89°34'15"E 783.89' S 0 8 ° 5 1 ' 0 5 " E 1 3 7 . 7 5 ' S0 4 ° 4 6 ' 2 9 " W 4 1 6 . 0 5 ' S3 4 ° 2 5 ' 3 7 " W 20 4 . 3 2 ' S0 0 ° 1 3 ' 5 3 " W 2 3 1 . 6 8 ' S 2 2 ° 2 9 ' 5 4 " E 3 9 8 . 1 8 ' L4 L5 L 6 L7 S2 6 ° 0 3 ' 5 0 " W 3 2 3 . 8 6 ' L8 S1 3 ° 5 4 ' 4 0 " W 4 0 3 . 0 0 ' L9 L10 L1 1 L12 S81°14'33" E 2 9 2 . 3 2 ' L1 3 L14L15L16L17 L18 L19L2 0 L21 L22 L23 L24 L2 5 L2 6 L27 L28 C 1 L29 L3 0 L 3 1 L 3 2 L 3 3 L 3 4 L35 L36 L3 7 L 3 8 L39 L40 C2 L4 1 C 3 L4 2 L4 3 L4 4 L45 L46 L4 7 S2 1 ° 0 6 ' 1 5 " W 21 2 . 4 5 ' 107 . 0 8 ' S43 ° 5 2 ' 0 2 " W S36 ° 3 3 ' 2 5 " W 77. 3 6 ' 101 . 3 5 ' S37 ° 4 4 ' 3 4 " W S3 2 ° 5 7 ' 1 9 " W 93 . 3 7 ' S07°12'04"W 88.69' 37 0 . 5 4 ' 54.22' S83°27'37"W 92.37' S86°00'00"E 399.29' 87.68'311.61' S85°24'43"E 197.81' S86°12'00"E 129.53' L48 OWNER CITY OF ASPEN LOT 5 PARK TRUST EXEMPTION OWNER CITY OF ASPEN TRACT 2 ANNIE MITCHELL HOMESTEAD OWNER CITY OF ASPEN LOT1-BLK 1 AABC OWNER MNT RESCUE ASPEN CHARITABLE TRUST OW N E R CI T Y O F A S P E N LO T 2 A - B U R L I N G A M E R A N C H OWNER BURLINGAME HOUSING INC LOT 2- BURLINGAME RANCH 60 ' P U B L I C A C C E S S E A S E M E N T PL A T B O O K 7 5 P A G E 4 6 UTILITY EASEMENT RECEPTION NO. 434205 UTILITY EASEMENT RECEPTION NO. 434205 UTILITY EASEMENT RECEPTION NO. 434205 UTILITY EASEMENT RECEPTION NO. 434205 HOLY CROSS EASEM E N T & RIGHT-OF-WAY BOOK 242 PAGE 834 HA R M O N Y RO A D HA R M O N Y RO A D STAGE ROAD PA E P C K E D R I V E CO L O R A D O S T A T E H I G H W A Y N O . 8 2 LOT 1D 3.566±ACRES LOT 1A 69.670±ACRES OW N E R SO L D N E R F A M I L Y L P L L L P SO L D N E R F A M I L Y PA R T N E R S H I P L L L P SU B D I V I S I O N FOUND REBAR & 1-1/4" YELLOW PLASTIC CAP LS9184 FOUND REBAR & 2" ALUMINUM CAP LS27936 FOUND REBAR & 1-1/2" ALUMINUM CAP LS33645 FOUND REBAR & 1-1/4" YELLOW PLASTIC CAP LS9184 FOUND REBAR & 1-1/4" ORANGE PLASTIC CAP LS28643 FOUND NO. 5 REBAR FOUND REBAR & 1-1/4" ORANGE PLASTIC CAP LS28643 FOUND NO. 5 REBAR FOUND NO. 5 REBAR FOUND REBAR & 1-1/4" ORANGE PLASTIC CAP LS28643 FOUND NO. 5 REBARS FOUND NO. 5 REBAR FOUND NO. 5 REBAR FOUND NO. 5 REBAR FOUND NO. 5 REBAR FOUND PK NAIL FOUND PK NAIL 6' WITNESS CORNER SET REBAR & 1-1/4" BLUE PLASTIC CAP WC TNC PLS38215 FOUND PK NAILS FOUND PK NAIL 25' WITNESS CORNER SET REBAR & 1-1/4" BLUE PLASTIC CAP WC TNC PLS38215 FOUND REBAR & 2" ALUMINUM CAP LS27936 BDANDCO ORF R EV I E W A SUBDIVISION OF LOT 1A CREATING LOT 1D SECTIONS 2 & 3, TOWNSHIP 10 SOUTH, RANGE 85 WEST OF THE 6TH PM CITY OF ASPEN, COUNTY OF PITKIN, STATE OF COLORADO BURLINGAME RANCH LOT 1A TRUE NORTH COLORADO LLC. A LAND SURVEYING AND MAPPING COMPANY P.O. BOX 614 - 386 MAIN STREET UNIT 3 NEW CASTLE, COLORADO 81647 (970) 984-0474 www.truenorthcolorado.com PROJECT NO: 2021-372 DATE:December 17, 2021 DRAWN RPK SURVEYED GBL-DJB SHEET 1 OF 1 TRUENORTH A LAND SURVEYING AND MAPPING COMPANY 150' 75'300' SCALE: 1" = 150' N 0 CURVE RADIUS ARC LENGTH CHORD LENGTH CHORD BEARING DELTA ANGLE C1 480.00'254.03'251.08'N 47°20'17" W 30°19'23" LINE BEARING DISTANCE L1 N 04°07'37" E 147.33' LINE DATA TABLE CURVE DATA TABLE NOTICE: ACCORDING TO COLORADO LAW YOU MUST COMMENCE ANY LEGAL ACTION BASED UPON ANY DEFECT IN THIS SURVEY WITHIN THREE YEARS AFTER YOU FIRST DISCOVER SUCH DEFECT. IN NO EVENT MAY ANY ACTION BASED UPON ANY DEFECT IN THIS SURVEY BE COMMENCED MORE THAN TEN YEARS FROM THE DATE OF CERTIFICATION SHOWN HEREON. FOUND COLORADO DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION MONUMENT A 3-1/4" ALUMINUM CAP STAMPED LS31551 SET NO. 5 REBAR & 1-1/4" ORANGE PLASTIC CAP TNC PLS38215 (UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED) SET NAIL & 1-1/2" ALUMINUM TAG TNC PLS38215 C2 30.00'21.24'20.80'S 45°27'04" E 40°33'46" C3 440.00'210.79'208.78'S 52°00'29" E 27°26'55" L2 N 11°00'38" W 110.99' L3 S 85°52'33" E 17.76' L4 N 84°27'15" E 92.93' L5 N 33°44'31" E 135.20' L6 S 18°16'53" E 80.12' L7 S 00°30'22" E 8.53' L8 S 34°04'47" W 120.81' L9 S 26°19'05" W 77.77' L10 S 40°00'43" W 41.85' L11 S 00°06'52" W 101.07' L12 S 81°14'33" E 52.75' L13 S 05°34'14" W 48.76' L14 N 87°21'40" W 81.12' L15 N 86°51'01" W 105.68' L16 N 87°00'55" W 142.90' L17 N 86°23'45" W 67.69' L18 N 09°38'37" W 26.19' L19 N 47°42'50" W 15.27' L20 N 58°22'32" W 131.07' L21 N 68°23'10" W 39.52' L22 N 74°55'41" W 94.37' L23 N 77°52'32" W 203.37' L24 N 72°11'56" W 50.28' L25 N 63°18'22" W 79.11' L26 N 55°13'05" W 36.91' L27 N 53°46'07" E 21.70' L28 N 26°18'34" E 8.89' L29 N 64°24'39" W 46.80' L30 N 24°14'05" E 70.74' L31 N 15°11'28" W 125.79' L32 N 20°37'56" W 146.36' L33 N 33°56'32" W 44.04' L34 N 40°56'06" W 157.43' L35 S 83°00'21" W 170.00' L36 S 53°24'26" W 88.79' L37 S 20°58'24" W 92.20' L38 S 25°25'08" E 246.42' L39 N 64°39'37" E 27.93' L40 S 25°10'11" E 10.07' L41 S 65°43'57" E 333.22' L42 N 57°21'45" W 72.50' L43 N 61°13'50" W 70.17' L44 N 63°44'04" W 328.51' L45 S 42°51'11" W 2.56' L46 N 63°44'32" W 37.67' L47 N 59°26'59" W 182.67' L48 S 22°43'37" E 29.10' AMENDED FINAL PLAT VICINITY MAP SITE NOTES: 5. THIS AMENDED PLAT DOES NOT CONSTITUTE A TITLE SEARCH BY TRUE NORTH COLORADO, LLC FOR ALL INFORMATION REGARDING EASEMENT, RIGHTS-OF-WAY AND/OR TITLE OF RECORD, TRUE NORTH COLORADO, LLC. RELIED UPON TITLE COMMITMENT NO. __________________________ ISSUED BY ________________________________, EFFECTIVE DATE: _____________________________________. SURVEYOR'S STATEMENT PERFORMED UNDER MY SUPERVISION AND RESPONSIBLE CHARGE AND THAT THIS SURVEY MEETS THE REQUIREMENTS OF A LAND SURVEY PLAT AS SET FORTH IN C.R.S. SECTION 38-51-106 AND IS TRUE AND CORRECT TO THE BEST OF MY BELIEF AND KNOWLEDGE. CITY COUNCIL APPROVAL CITY OF ASPEN COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DIRECTOR'S APPROVAL THIS AMENDED PLAT HAS BEEN REVIEWED AND APPROVED FOR COMPLIANCE WITH THE APPLICABLE PROVISIONS OF THE CITY OF ASPEN LAND USE CODE BY THE CITY OF ASPEN COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DIRECTOR THIS ________ DAY OF __________________, 20________, TO THE EXTENT THAT ANYTHING IN THIS PLAT IS INCONSISTENT OR IN CONFLICT WITH ANY CITY OF ASPEN DEVELOPMENT ORDERS RELATING TO THIS PLAT OR ANY OTHER PROVISIONS OF APPLICABLE LAW, INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO OTHER APPLICABLE LAND USE REGULATIONS AND BUILDING CODES, SUCH OTHER DEVELOPMENT ORDERS OR APPLICABLE LAWS SHALL CONTROL. BY:_____________________________________________________________________________ PHILLIP SUPINO - COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DIRECTOR CLERK AND RECORDER'S CERTIFICATE CERTIFICATE OF OWNERSHIP KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS THAT THE UNDERSIGNED THE CITY OF ASPEN BEING THE SOLE OWNER IN FEE SIMPLE OF ALL THAT REAL PROPERTY SITUATED IN PITKIN COUNTY, SHOWN ON THIS AMENDED PLAT AND DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: CONTAINING A TOTAL OF 73.236 ACRES, MORE OR LESS, DO HEREBY EXECUTE AND RECORD THIS AMENDED PLAT. EXECUTED THIS_________________ DAY OF ___________________________, A.D., 20_______. OWNER: CITY OF ASPEN 130 S.GALENA STREET ASPEN, CO 81611 BY:________________________________________________________________ XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX STATE OF COLORADO ) )ss COUNTY OF PITKIN ) THE FOREGOING CERTIFICATION OF OWNERSHIP WAS ACKNOWLEDGED BEFORE ME THIS _______ DAY OF_____________________________, 20_____, BY ____________________________________, AS ___________________ OF THE CITY OF ASPEN. MY COMMISSION EXPIRES:_____________________________________________ WITNESS MY HAND AND SEAL ____________________________________________________________________________ NOTARY PUBLIC TITLE CERTIFICATE I, __________________________________________ AN AGENT AUTHORIZED BY PITKIN COUNTY, DO HEREBY CERTIFY THAT I HAVE EXAMINED THE TITLE TO ALL LANDS SHOWN UPON THIS AMENDED PLAT AND THAT TITLE TO SUCH LANDS IS VESTED IN THE CITY OF ASPEN IS FREE AND CLEAR OF ALL LIENS AND ENCUMBRANCES (INCLUDING MORTGAGES, DEEDS OF TRUST, JUDGMENTS, EASEMENTS, CONTRACTS AND AGREEMENTS OF RECORD AFFECTING THE REAL PROPERTY IN THIS MAP), EXCEPT AS SET FORTH IN THE COMMITMENT FOR TITLE INSURANCE ISSUED BY ___________________________ COMMITMENT NO. __________________________ DATED: ______________________________. DATED THIS___________DAY OF______________________________________, A.D., 20_____ TITLE COMPANY INFORMATION BY;_____________________________________________________________________ AUTHORIZED AGENT CITY OF ASPEN ENGINEER'S REVIEW THIS AMENDED PLAT WAS REVIEWED FOR DEPICTION OF THE ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT SURVEY REQUIREMENTS. DATED THIS___________DAY OF______________________________________, A.D., 20_____ BY;_____________________________________________________________________ TRICIA ARAGON, P.E. - CITY OF ASPEN ENGINEER FOUND REBAR & 1-1/4" RED PLASTIC CAP SGM LS20133 (UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED) Exhibit C | AVLT Letter and Entitlement Docs 27 L 1 L2 L 3 L 4 L5 L6 L 7 L 8 L 9 L 1 0 L1 1 L1 2 L13 L14 L15 L1 6 L1 7 L1 8 L 1 9 L 2 0 L 2 2 L 2 3L24 L 2 5 L2 6 L27 L28 L29 L3 0 L31 L32 L3 3 L34 L35 L36 L37 L38 L39 L 4 0 L41 L42 L 4 3 L44 L45 L46 L47 L48 L 4 9 L 5 0 L 5 1 L 2 1 L 5 2 L 5 3 L54 L55 L56 L57 L58 L59 L60 L61 L62 N0 4 ° 0 8 ' 5 0 " E 9 1 5 . 1 2 ' L=150.75' R=855.00' CH=N38°32'40"W 150.56' L6 3 L64 L65 L=140.73' R=955.00' CH=S44°55'32"E 140.60' N0 2 ° 2 1 ' 3 7 " E 5 6 9 . 4 9 ' N 4 4 ° 0 8 ' 2 3 " W 1 0 0 9 . 3 1 ' N88°27'47"W 139.79' S53 ° 3 8 ' 4 5 " W 4 6 3 . 3 5 ' S0 4 ° 4 1 ' 4 8 " W 7 7 6 . 6 8 ' N86°00'00"W 311.61' S2 1 ° 0 6 ' 1 5 " W 21 2 . 4 5 ' 107 . 0 8 ' S43 ° 5 2 ' 0 2 " W S36 ° 3 3 ' 2 5 " W 77. 3 6 ' 101 . 3 5 ' S37 ° 4 4 ' 3 4 " W L66 22 6 . 3 4 ' S0 1 ° 1 7 ' 4 7 " E S0 6 ° 1 0 ' 4 9 " W 4 0 8 . 0 0 ' S0 0 ° 5 6 ' 3 1 " W 3 7 7 . 7 2 ' S0 1 ° 1 2 ' 2 0 " W 24 3 . 6 6 ' L67 L68 L69 L 7 0 L 7 1 L 7 2 L 7 3 L7 4 L75 L76 C 1 L77 C2 S80°29'37 " E 2 4 2 . 7 4 ' L=328.69' R=220.00' CH=N56°41'44"E 298.96' N1 3 ° 5 4 ' 4 0 " E 3 2 9 . 1 5 ' C3 N2 6 ° 0 2 ' 4 1 " E 5 0 2 . 2 9 ' L78 L7 9 L80 L 8 1 POINT OF BEGINNING N85°58'55"E 886.20'(TI E ) WEST 1/4 CORNER SECTION 2 NW CORNER SECTION 2 LOT 1 PARCEL 2 PARK TRUST EXEMPTION RECEPTION NO. 515995 RAILROAD RIGHT-OF-WAY EXEMPTION RECEPTION NO. 515995 LOT 1A BURLINGAME RANCH RECEPTION NO. 515997 150' EA S T E R L Y R I G H T - O F - W A Y CO L O R A D O S T A T E H I G H W A Y N O . 8 2 LOT 2A BURLINGAME RANCH RECEPTION NO. 515997 BURLINGAME RANCH AFFORDABLE HOUSING FILING NO. 1 1ST AMENDMENT RECEPTION NO. 522859 SOUTH AREA RECEPTION NO. 598456 NORTH AREA RECEPTION NO. 598456 ANNIE MITCHELL HOMESTEAD RECEPTION NO. 504392 RED BUTTE RANCH CONSERVATION PARCEL C RED BUTTE RANCH CONSERVATION PARCEL B HA R M O N Y R O A D LOT 2 BURLINGAME RANCH STAGE ROAD 60 ' A C C E S S E A S E M E N T CONSERVATION EASEMENT 83.517± ACRES PROPOSED LOT 1D SURVEYOR 'S STATEMENT I, RODNEY P. KISER, DO HEREBY STATE THAT THIS EASEMENT EXHIBIT WAS PREPARED BY TRUE NORTH COLORADO, LLC. FOR ASPEN VALLEY LAND TRUST AND THE CITY OF ASPEN, THAT SAID EASEMENT EXHIBIT WAS PREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY SUPERVISION AND RESPONSIBLE CHARGE AND THAT IT IS TRUE AND CORRECT TO THE BEST OF MY BELIEF AND KNOWLEDGE. ORF R E V I EWA V L T LOT 1A, BURLINGAME RANCH & LOT 1, PARCEL 2, PARK TRUST EXEMPTION MAP SITUATED IN SECTIONS 2 & 3, TOWNSHIP 10 SOUTH, RANGE 85 WEST OF THE 6TH PM CITY OF ASPEN, COUNTY OF PITKIN, STATE OF COLORADO EASEMENT EXHIBIT AVLT CONSERVATION EASEMENT IN GROSS TRUE NORTH COLORADO LLC. A LAND SURVEYING AND MAPPING COMPANY P.O. BOX 614 - 386 MAIN STREET UNIT 3 NEW CASTLE, COLORADO 81647 (970) 984-0474 www.truenorthcolorado.com PROJECT NO: 2021-372 DATE: April 14, 2022 DRAWN RPK SURVEYED GBL SHEET 1 OF 1 TRUENORTH A LAND SURVEYING AND MAPPING COMPANY 40' 20'80' SCALE: 1" = 200' N DESCRIPTION OF CONSERVATION EASEMENT IN GROSS: 0 LINE BEARING DISTANCE L1 N 47°19'02" W 58.30' LINE DATA TABLE NOTICE: ACCORDING TO COLORADO LAW YOU MUST COMMENCE ANY LEGAL ACTION BASED UPON ANY DEFECT IN THIS SURVEY WITHIN THREE YEARS AFTER YOU FIRST DISCOVER SUCH DEFECT. IN NO EVENT MAY ANY ACTION BASED UPON ANY DEFECT IN THIS SURVEY BE COMMENCED MORE THAN TEN YEARS FROM THE DATE OF CERTIFICATION SHOWN HEREON. L2 N 63°31'43" W 37.01' L3 N 32°57'04" W 28.62' L4 N 03°49'29" W 57.21' L5 N 44°01'29" W 34.45' L6 N 01°29'44" E 65.10' L7 N 24°26'33" W 45.02' L8 N 07°24'27" W 65.00' L9 N 02°52'59" W 92.03' L10 N 01°05'50" W 93.91' L11 N13°29'14" E 46.27' L12 N 18°30'47" E 51.25' L13 N 38°33'07" E 44.21' L14 N 52°09'50" E 40.44' L15 N 37°29'25" E 51.00' L16 N 16°25'17" E 55.15' L17 N 05°18'35" E 211.74' L18 N 03°58'53" E 159.10' L19 N 10°02'39" W 66.42' L20 N 12°15'27" W 79.46' L21 N 24°17'49" W 51.02' L22 N 17°46'51" W 242.75' L23 N 10°51'59" W 77.99' L24 N 35°19'21" W 15.54' L25 N 15°59'07" W 94.06' L26 N 03°58'21" E 55.94' L27 N 24°08'39" W 36.05' L28 N 18°20'17" W 25.19' L29 N 00°24'43" E 27.35' L30 N 24°19'20" E 56.94' L31 N 33°50'33" E 28.09' L32 N 07°43'35" E 33.79' L33 N 31°57'52" E 49.10' L34 N 25°20'39" E 32.71' L35 N 09°42'31" E 31.73' L36 N 01°33'12" W 31.29' L37 N 74°35'21" E 25.89' L38 S 41°18'02" E 36.96' L39 S 83°42'01" E 23.34' L40 S 53°14'06" E 81.31' L41 S 59°53'26" E 49.11' L42 S 77°52'34" E 37.47' L43 S 50°41'06" E 106.44' L44 S 45°16'36" E 36.67' L45 S 69°35'40" E 28.31' L46 S 43°43'05" E 34.90' L47 S 52°26'43" E 33.03' L48 S 58°08'19" E 43.53' L49 S 28°48'00" E 65.76' L50 S 21°31'35" E 40.42' L51 S 19°02'18" E 73.28' L52 S 07°11'09"E 40.51' L53 S 22°56'10" E 53.92' L54 S 05°41'50" E 37.97' L55 S 08°48'42" W 23.50' L56 S 48°06'39" E 22.86' L57 S 37°29'24" E 23.09' L58 N 88°20'52" E 23.60' L59 S 82°59'34" E 14.47' L60 S 24°16'44" E 46.42' L61 S 35°06'34" E 43.42' L62 S 20°13'20" E 50.36' L63 N 04°08'50" E 99.86' L64 N 88°27'47" W 106.43' L65 S 02°21'37" W 2.90' L66 S 32°57'19" W 13.58' L67 S 13°24'49" E 59.44' L68 N53°24'26" E 17.28' L77 N 53°46'07" E 20.90' L78 N 22°43'37" W 7.00' L79 S 33°44'31" W 135.20' L80 S 84°27'15" W 92.93' L81 N 22°29'54" W 79.80' CURVE RADIUS ARC LENGTH CHORD LENGTH CHORD BEARING DELTA ANGLE CURVE DATA TABLE C2 369.21'169.06'167.59'S 67°22'34" E 26°14'07" C3 280.00'59.30'59.19'N 19°58'18" E 12°08'07" L76 S 26°18'34" W 8.89' L75 S 64°24'39" E 46.80' L74 S 24°14'05" W 70.74' L73 S 15°11'28" E 125.79' L72 S 20°37'56" E 146.36' L71 S 33°56'32" E 44.04' L70 S 40°56'06" E 157.43' L69 N 83°00'21" E 170.00' C1 480.00'254.03'251.08'S 47°20'17" E 30°19'23" Exhibit C | AVLT Letter and Entitlement Docs 28 320 Main St. Suite 204 | Carbondale, CO 81623 | 970.963.8440 | avlt@avlt.org | page 1 January 24, 2022 City of Aspen Burlingame Affordable Housing Project Team C/O: Chris Everson (City of Aspen) & Jason Jaynes (DHM Design) 130 South Galena St. Aspen, CO 81611 RE: Easement Correction Process for Amcord / Burlingame East “Triangle Parcel” To Whom it May Concern: As you are aware, a portion of the Amcord / Burlingame East property also referred to as the Deer Hill Open Space (the “Property”) is encumbered by a perpetual conservation easement, granted to Aspen Valley Land Trust (AVLT) recorded in Pitkin County on June 30, 2003, at Reception Number 484728 (the “Easement”), and corrected on April 14, 2009 at Reception Number 558008 (the “2009 Correction). The purpose of this letter is to outline the necessary steps for recording a final correction to the Easement in order to correct the legal description and identify the exact areas that have been excluded from the Easement for development of the Burlingame Affordable Housing Project. Background The stated purpose of the Easement is to “assure that the Property will remain forever predominantly in its open space, natural habitat and recreational condition subject to the uses of the Property permitted hereunder, and to prevent any use of the Property that will significantly impair or interfere with the Conservation Values of the Property and, in the event of their degradation or destruction, to restore such Conservation Values of the Property.” The 2009 Correction then identified three areas to be excluded from the Easement for the purpose of developing the Burlingame Affordable Housing Projects. The 2009 Correction additionally established "the Parties' intent to further correct the Conservation Easement in the future to more specifically identify the properties to be excluded from the Conservation Easement after the City completes the Burlingame Ranch Affordable Housing Project and completes the development of affordable housing on the '150 foot wide strip or to the toe of the slope' parcel.” (The '150 foot wide strip or to the toe of the slope' parcel will be referred to as the “Triangle Parcel” for the purposes of this letter.) Process While the 2009 Correction calls for the City of Aspen (the “City”) to “provide the Trust a legal description of the property for the affordable housing project contemplated for that parcel within thirty (30) days of the completion of the Burlingame Affordable Housing Project,” AVLT believes that it may be in the best interest of all involved parties to record the updated correction as soon as soon as Exhibit C | AVLT Letter and Entitlement Docs 29 320 Main St. Suite 204 | Carbondale, CO 81623 | 970.963.8440 | avlt@avlt.org | page 2 practicable. At a minimum, the updated correction must be recorded before any final subdivision of the triangle parcel from the main Amcord parcel may occur. As such, AVLT staff has identified the following process for recording an updated correction to the Easement, allowing the Burlingame Affordable Housing Project development and any associated land use actions such as subdivision to proceed: 1) Provide legal descriptions and surveys. The City and partners will provide AVLT staff with surveys and written legal descriptions for the Annie Mitchel Housing Project, the existing Burlingame Housing Project, and the Triangle Parcel Burlingame Housing Project. AVLT may also request that the City provide a survey and legal description of the updated Easement area that excludes the three parcels. AVLT will then reference these surveys with the 2009 Correction and provide preliminary approval of the surveys via email. 2) AVLT Board Resolution. AVLT staff will present the AVLT board with the necessary information and request a Board Resolution approving an updated correction to the Easement. This resolution would potentially include the provided surveys and legal descriptions, as well as a draft copy of the updated Correction. This draft Correction language will be developed by AVLT staff and counsel, and refined with the City and partners as needed. 3) Record updated Correction to the Easement. AVLT Staff will then work with the City and partners to record the updated Correction to the Easement. After the updated Correction is recorded, the City may begin development work and subdivision in the Triangle Parcel as established by the 2009 Correction, without further approval or interaction with AVLT or the Easement. Thank you for working closely with our team as we together through this process. Please don’t hesitate to contact me below with any questions or concerns. Sincerely, Bud Tymczyszyn, AICP (tim-chiz-in) Conservation Easement Specialist Aspen Valley Land Trust bud@avlt.org 909-499-5038 (cell) Exhibit C | AVLT Letter and Entitlement Docs 30 From: Bud Tymczyszyn [mailto:bud@avlt.org] Sent: Tuesday, May 10, 2022 1:35 PM To: Jason Jaynes <jjaynes@dhmdesign.com>; Dave Erickson <dave@avlt.org>; Erin Quinn <erin@avlt.org> Subject: Re: Aspen Lumberyard - Deer Hill easement exhibit Hi Jason, Thanks for checking in, and sorry for the delay. We were out part of last week on a team trip, and I'm dealing with some sick days right now. Unfortunately I won't be able to get you an updated memo until next week, but you can go ahead and use the January memo and my email below for the subdivision application if that still works for you. I'm hoping to take some time to write up the draft Correction for the CE later this week / early next, so hopefully we'll have that to start sharing with you all soon. I'm also working on a little memo that outlines all the prior land use moves and background related to this so our board can have some history, and we can have that to refer to in the future should we need. If you're game, I might call you later this week or next to ask you a couple clarifying questions to help with this. Our June board meeting has moved and is no longer on the 15th, but is still happening in June. I'll keep you posted on the date in case that changes anything for you guys. Thanks Jason! Let me know if I'm missing anything here-- don't want to leave you hanging! Bud Tymczyszyn, AICP (Pronounced Tim-chiz-in) Conservation Easement Specialist (c) 909.499.5038 Exhibit C | AVLT Letter and Entitlement Docs 31 From: Bud Tymczyszyn [mailto:bud@avlt.org] Sent: Tuesday, April 26, 2022 3:42 PM To: Jason Jaynes <jjaynes@dhmdesign.com>; Dave Erickson <dave@avlt.org>; Erin Quinn <erin@avlt.org> Cc: Bob Schultz <rschultzconsulting@gmail.com>; Christopher Everson <chris.everson@aspen.gov> Subject: Re: Aspen Lumberyard - Deer Hill easement exhibit Hi Jason, Thanks for sending this over. Having this singular survey with all of the housing exclusions shown is exactly what we needed to move forward to the next step. Keep us posted as the final verification come through, otherwise we'll work from this and assume it should pretty closely reflect the final. I think it was a good call adding the 150' from the ROW into the excluded area too-- I imagine our board will like that this essentially maxes out the final reserved right from the easement and will be the final amendment. Now that we have the survey, our next steps are (a) AVLT staff review, (b) AVLT will develop a draft final amendment to the CE, (c) work with City and parners to refine, (d) bring to AVLT Board for resolution June 15th. If helpful, I'm happy to update the previous memo to reflect this for the subdivision application. Let me know if and when you would like that and I can put something together. Also happy to hop on the phone if there are any questions about the rest of the AVLT board process outlined here. Thanks Jason! We'll have more for you soon after our team reviews the survey / LD. Best, Bud Tymczyszyn, AICP (Pronounced Tim-chiz-in) Conservation Easement Specialist (c)909.499.5038 Exhibit C | AVLT Letter and Entitlement Docs 32 100' WIDE GREENBELT PLAT BOOK 7 PAGE 79 LOT 2-BLOCK 1 OWNER MOUNTAIN RESCUE ASPEN CHARITABLE TRUST PARCEL NO. 273503100045 ASPEN AIRPORT BUSINESS CENTER FILING NO. 1 PLAT BOOK 7 PAGE 79 LOT 1-BLOCK 1 ASPEN AIRPORT BUSINESS CENTER FILING NO. 1 PLAT BOOK 7 PAGE 79 AS P E N R O A D 60 ' W I D E P R I V A T E PL A T BO O K 7 P A G E 7 9 SW CORNER LOT 1-BLOCK 1 FOUND #5 REBAR & 1-1/4" YELLOW PLASTIC CAP LS9184 LOT 1A BURLINGAME RANCH PLAT BOOK 75 PAGE 46 CO L O R A D O S T A T E HI G H W A Y N O . 8 2 S86°46'00"E 202.82' N86°46'00"W 153.93' S0 3 ° 1 4 ' 0 0 " W 2 9 6 . 9 7 ' N0 3 ° 1 4 ' 0 0 " E 2 4 7 . 9 7 ' Δ90°00'00" L=45.55' R=29.00' CH=N41°46'00"W 41.01' 20 . 0 0 ' 20.00' N86°08'06"W N0 3 ° 3 2 ' 4 0 " E 17.06' POINT OF BEGINNING AC C E S S E A S E M E N T ~ 9 , 7 7 7 ± S Q . F T . ACCESS EASEMENT ASPEN AIRPORT BUSINESS CENTER FILING NO. 1 SECTION 3, TOWNSHIP 10 SOUTH, RANGE 85 WEST OF THE 6TH P.M. COUNTY OF PITKIN, STATE OF COLORADO ACCESS EASEMENT A STRIP OF LAND SITUATED IN SECTION 3, TOWNSHIP 10 SOUTH, RANGE 85 WEST OF THE SIXTH PRINCIPAL MERIDIAN, COUNTY OF PITKIN, STATE OF COLORADO; SAID STRIP OF LAND LYING WITHIN THE AMENDED AND RESTATED PLAT OF ASPEN AIRPORT BUSINESS CENTER FILING NO. 1 RECORDED IN PLAT BOOK 7 AT PAGE 79 IN THE PITKIN COUNTY RECORDS; BEING MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: COMMENCING AT THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF LOT 1, BLOCK 1 OF SAID ASPEN AIRPORT BUSINESS CENTER FILING NO. 1; THENCE S86°08'06"E ALONG THE SOUTH LINE OF SAID LOT 1 A DISTANCE OF 17.06 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING; THENCE LEAVING SAID SOUTH LINE N03°14'00"E A DISTANCE OF 247.97 FEET; THENCE 45.55 FEET ALONG A CURVE TO THE LEFT HAVING A RADIUS OF 29.00 FEET AND A CHORD THAT BEARS N41°46'00"W A DISTANCE OF 41.01 FEET; THENCE N86°46'00"W A DISTANCE OF 153.93 FEET TO A POINT ON THE EASTERLY RIGHT-OF-WAY OF COLORADO STATE HIGHWAY NO. 82; THENCE N03°32'40"E ALONG SAID EAST LINE A DISTANCE OF 20.00 FEET; THENCE LEAVING SAID EAST LINE S86°46'00"E A DISTANCE OF 202.82 FEET; THENCE S03°14'00"W A DISTANCE OF 296.47 FEET TO A POINT ON THE SOUTH LINE OF SAID LOT 1; THENCE N86°08'06"W ALONG SAID SOUTH LINE A DISTANCE OF 20.00 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING, SAID STRIP OF LAND CONTAINS 9,777 SQUARE FEET MORE OR LESS. PROJECT NO: 2021-372 DATE: January 24, 2022 DRAWN RPK SURVEYED GBL SHEET 1 OF 1 TRUENORTH A LAND SURVEYING AND MAPPING COMPANY N TRUE NORTH COLORADO LLC. A LAND SURVEYING AND MAPPING COMPANY P.O. BOX 614 - 386 MAIN STREET UNIT 3 NEW CASTLE, COLORADO 81647 (970) 984-0474 www.truenorthcolorado.com EXHIBIT A SCALE: 1" = 50' Exhibit C | AVLT Letter and Entitlement Docs 33 Burlingame Triangle Parcel Major Subdivision Burlingame Subdivision: Lot 1A Parcel: 273503100805 Prepared for: City of Aspen 130 S. Galena St. Aspen, CO 81611 Prepared by: Robert Schultz Consulting, LLC 354 Fawn Dr. Carbondale, CO 81623 May 2022 Exhibit D | Application 34 Burlingame Triangle Subdivision May 2022 2 Introduction Subdivision The City of Aspen acquired 220+ acres from the Paepcke Trust in 1997 for affordable housing and conservation. The land was subsequently subdivided to create the Burlingame Ranch Subdivision, which includes the subject parcel of this application, Lot 1A. While most of the Lot 1A parcel is intended for conservation, portions, including a triangle of land at the base of Deer Hill proposed as new Lot 1D, were identified for meeting housing or other needs for the community. The Burlingame Subdivision only described the boundary of the triangle in general terms. Specifically, several documents, including the City of Aspen Pre-Annexation Agreement (Reception #515868) and the 2009 Conservation Easement Correction Deed (Reception #558008) describe the area in a similar manner, as: “a 150 foot wide strip or to the toe of the slope (whichever is wider) of the Burlingame Ranch which adjoins Highway 82”. The Conservation Easement anticipated that the exact boundary would be resolved, and the easement boundary corrected to exclude the triangle property later. This application defines that boundary between conservation and other community uses. The Plat to create the new triangle parcel, Lot 1D, is displayed in Attachment A and below. Since the lot split process can only be used once for a “fathering parcel”, the current subdivision will be processed as a Major Subdivision even though no development is being approved at this time. Exhibit D | Application 35 Burlingame Triangle Subdivision May 2022 3 Exhibit D | Application 36 Burlingame Triangle Subdivision May 2022 4 At this time, the City applies to subdivide the +/- 73.236-acre Lot 1A parcel into revised Lot 1A that will be 69.67 acres and a new Lot 1D that will be 3.566 acres. Lot 1D is the land previously envisioned for housing. While this action does not include any proposed development, the City acknowledges that there will be a master plan for housing at this property and the City-owned properties north of this site in the future. The triangle area currently does not include any structures but hosts a section of the AABC trail and a spur trail to Annie Mitchell homes. The AABC trail provides an important 3-mile link for bicycle and pedestrian commuting and recreation between downtown Aspen and the Aspen Airport Business Center. The parcel that is now the Annie Mitchell housing was previously part of an original Lot 1 and a lot split was used to advance that affordable housing project. Since the lot split process can only be used once for a “fathering parcel”, the current subdivision will be processed as a Major Subdivision even though no development is being approved at this time. Lot 1D includes +/- 155,335 square feet of land. +/-144,455 square feet of that land was zoned RR in 1999 (Reception #437962). The remaining +/- 10,930 square feet is currently zoned Conservation (C). The new Lot 1D will include both current zoning designations until a future housing plan is approved that includes rezoning. The current lot 1A also includes two zone districts. Code Section 26.480.040 (c) calls for a single zone district to be applied on any new parcels “unless unique circumstances dictate”. We believe that the fact that a master plan for housing on this and adjacent City parcels is being developed at this time and that plan will likely require rezoning from either the RR or C zone district is the unique circumstance that justifies leaving the existing zoning in place at this time. City staff agrees with this approach. Zoning on the triangle parcel is intended to be a “holding zone” until a master plan is completed and approved. This subdivision is an important step toward planning for the entire assemblage of land and the ultimate redevelopment of the properties. At the appropriate time, a land use plan will be submitted to the City for development of affordable housing. Conservation Easement A separate document, developed in consultation with the Aspen Valley Land Trust, provides a legal description of the conservation easement and that document will be recorded as well. The conservation area also includes land that is not in Lot 1A. While not the subject of this application, the information is provided as background since both land conservation and affordable housing are both important community values. This subdivision is an important step toward planning for the entire assemblage of land and the ultimate redevelopment of the properties. Exhibit D | Application 37 Burlingame Triangle Subdivision May 2022 5 During 2020, a surveyor was enlisted to provide more detailed topographic information to identify a reasonable “toe of slope” border and proposed boundary for a new Lot 1D. The property was staked by the surveyor to identify the proposed boundary. Last fall, the project team, City staff, and staff from the Aspen Valley Land Trust (AVLT) met at the site to review the draft boundary. The goal has been to create a boundary that both the City and AVLT believe is consistent with previous agreements. AVLT and City staffs found the proposed boundary consistent with those agreements and the application under review is based on that concurrence. The AVLT Board is scheduled to act on approval of the boundary at their June meeting. See Attachment J for more information. The conservation easement boundary is identified in Attachment B. In total, about 83.5 acres are permanently conserved. The conservation easement boundary is displayed in Attachment B and below. Resolving the boundary of Lot 1D will facilitate planning efforts for the larger future housing plan by proving a clear definition of the southern end of the property. Establishing a clear boundary for the Conservation Easement will make enforcing the provisions of the Easement and Management Plan more effective for the Aspen Valley Land Trust. Exhibit D | Application 38 Burlingame Triangle Subdivision May 2022 6 City of Aspen Land Use Code- Subdivision Compliance with Sec. 26.304.030 (a) General Response: See this application and attachments for all information required. Also See Attachments H, I, and J. Compliance with Sec. 26.304.030 (b.1) Representation Response: See this application and attachments for all information required. See Attachments H. Compliance with Sec. 26.304.030 (b.2) Parcel ID Response: See first page of this application. Parcel ID is 273503100805. Compliance with Sec. 26.304.030 (b.3) Ownership Response: A title commitment is provided as Attachment E. Compliance with Sec. 26.304.030 (b.4) Vicinity Map Response: A vicinity map is Attachment D. Compliance with Sec. 26.304.030 (b.5) Site Plan Response: A site plan is Attachment F; no new development is proposed. Compliance with Sec. 26.304.030 (b.6) Site Improvements Response: The requirement is requested to be waived, however the topographic and improvements are displayed on Attachment F. The site is covered with sage and brush in both Lot 1A and 1D. Lot 1D will be subject to a conservation easement and Lot 1D is not proposed for development in this application. The existing concrete trails will continue to be used. The dominant feature of Lot 1A is Deer Hill. Lot 1D begins at the toe of the slope of Deer Hill. The general condition of the site is displayed in the Google Earth image below. Exhibit D | Application 39 Burlingame Triangle Subdivision May 2022 7 Exhibit D | Application 40 Burlingame Triangle Subdivision May 2022 8 Compliance with Sec. 26.304.030 (b.7) Written Description Response: This document is our response to this requirement. Compliance with Sec. 26.304.030 (b.8) Additional Information Response: The resolution of the boundary of the conservation easement was requested and Attachment B addressed that request. Compliance with Sec. 26.304.035 Neighborhood Outreach Response: Outreach to neighbors and the community at-large has been ongoing over the previous two years regarding the ultimate affordable housing plan and steps needed to achieve that goal. This annexation and zoning are a logical step toward that future housing plan, but the housing plan will be a separate, future application. The City of Aspen Public Record includes reports on the affordable housing project outreach that was presented in public City Council meetings. In October 2021, an email update with project information, including this subdivision request, was sent to more than 300 participants in previous project outreach events who expressed interest in project updates as well as the City’s email list. In addition, two public outreach events were held on December 9 to continue outreach regarding project progress, including the annexation and initial zoning of the property. Individual outreach has also been employed during the ongoing public outreach to specific stakeholders. A project website at www.aspenlumberyard.com was used during the previous phase of work and information is currently being shared at: https://www.aspencommunityvoice.com/lumberyard. That site provides information on the overall planning for future housing as well as the annexation. There are opportunities for feedback as well as information about upcoming input opportunities and summaries of previous public comments. Finally, mailed public notice will be sent to property owners in an area far greater than that required by the land use code. Notice will include residences in the North Forty and Burlingame neighborhoods, which are outside of the required boundary. Compliance with Sec. 26.480.040 (a) Access to Public Way Response: Access to a public right of way and State Highway 82 are provided via access easement across the City-owned lumberyard properties. Easements are included in this application as Attachment C and would be recorded prior to the plat for this subdivision. The easement is for a driveway access to the site since no development is proposed. In the future, a housing plan will be proposed that will provide a more formal access plan, traffic study, and road design information. Compliance with Sec. 26.480.040 (b) Original Townsite Response: Not Applicable as this property was not part of the original townsite. Exhibit D | Application 41 Burlingame Triangle Subdivision May 2022 9 Compliance with Sec. 26.480.040 (c) Zoning Conformance Response: The parcel contains two zone districts as explained above. Both the applicant and City staff find that the circumstances are unique to the history of this property and the intention to rezone the property in the future in conjunction with City-owned property to the north for affordable housing. Conformance is afforded related to other zoning criteria. Compliance with Sec. 26.480.040 (d) Existing Structures, Uses, Non-conformities Response: The property does not currently include residential or other structures. There are two public trails through the property that will continue use. There are no known non- conformities. Compliance with Sec. 26.480.070 (a 1) General Standards Response: Complied, see this application. Compliance with Sec. 26.480.070 (a.2) Efficient Use of Land Response: The subdivision allows for the future planning of affordable housing on a site long planned for affordable housing. The subdivision also clarifies boundaries between conserved lands and lands to be developed. Combined with the lumberyard and mini storage parcels, an efficient land use plan can be developed for needed affordable housing. The subdivision also resolves the final boundary for the conservation easement on the adjacent property. Compliance with Sec. 26.480.070 (a.3) Preserves Geological Features, Vegetation, Structures Response: No geological or vegetative features or structures on the property with historical merit have been identified. This application will not authorize new construction at the site. Compliance with Sec. 26.480.070 (a.4) Avoids Hazards Response: The property boundary was intentionally set at the “toe of the slope” in accordance with previous agreements to be on land that is not subject to geological hazards. When a housing plan is developed, a soils study will be submitted for review. Compliance with Sec. 26.480.070 (a.5) Engineering Design and Urban Runoff Response: Not applicable, no development is proposed. A future housing plan will be required to address these standards. Compliance with Sec. 26.480.070 (a.6) Improve Public Infrastructure There are two public trails through the property that will continue use. Exhibit D | Application 42 Burlingame Triangle Subdivision May 2022 10 Response: Not applicable, no new public infrastructure is proposed at the site. A future housing plan will be required to address this standard. The existing trails will continue use. Compliance with Sec. 26.480.070 (a.7) Growth Management Response: Not applicable, the subdivision does not include a proposal for development. Compliance with Sec. 26.480.070 (a.8) School Land Dedication Response: Not applicable, a future housing plan will need to address School Land Dedication. Compliance with Sec. 26.480.070 (a.9) Subdivision Plat Response: A Proposed plat is attached as Attachment A; upon approval it will be submitted to the County Clerk and Recorder. Compliance with Sec. 26.480.070 (a.10) Development Agreement Response: Not applicable, no development is proposed. A future housing project would be subject to a Development Agreement. Compliance with Sec. 26.480.070 (b) Vehicular Rights-of-Way Response: Not applicable, as the proposal is to serve a single parcel. Attachment C displays access to the site. Compliance with Sec. 26.480.80 (b) General Information Response: This application and attached documents meet the Code requirements for submission. The legal description and parcel identification information is listed on the cover page. A Title Commitment is attached as Attachment E. A Vicinity Map is attached as Attachment D. The proposed Plat is attached as Attachment A. Attachment F displays existing trails and topographic information used to develop the proposed boundary of Lot 1A and Lot 1D to document that the “Toe of Slope” was used to identify the boundary per previous agreements. The other requirements of this section were not applicable as no new development is proposed. Compliance with Sec. 26.480.80 (c) Response: The review criteria are addressed in the above text and attached Exhibits. Compliance with Sec. 26.480.80 (d) Response: A draft Plat is attached as Attachment A. Exhibit D | Application 43 Burlingame Triangle Subdivision May 2022 11 Compliance with Sec. 26.480.80 (e) Response: Not applicable, no new development is proposed. Compliance with Sec. 26.480.80 (f) Response: Not applicable, no new development is proposed. Compliance with Sec. 26.480.80 (g) Response: Not applicable, no new development is proposed. Compliance with Sec. 26.480.80 (h) Response: Not applicable, no new development is proposed. Compliance with Sec. 26.480.80 (i) Response: Not applicable, no changes to vehicular rights of way are proposed. Compliance with Sec. 26.480.80 (j) Response: Not applicable, no changes to vehicular rights of way are proposed. Compliance with Sec. 26.480.80 (k) Response: Not applicable, no changes to vehicular rights of way are proposed. Exhibit D | Application 44 Burlingame Triangle Subdivision May 2022 12 Schedule of Attachments A- Draft Plat B- Conservation Easement C- Access Easement D- Vicinity Map E- Title Commitment F- Existing Conditions G- Pre-Application Conference Notes H- Land Use Form I- Fee Agreement J- HOA Compliance Form K- Aspen Valley Land Trust Letter Exhibit D | Application 45 MEMORANDUM TO: Aspen Planning & Zoning Commission FROM: Chris Everson, Affordable Housing Project Manager THROUGH: Kevin Rayes, Planner MEMO DATE: September 8, 2022 MEETING DATE: September 20, 2022 RE: Lumberyard Affordable Housing Project Update SUMMARY: Designs for the City of Aspen’s Lumberyard affordable housing project have evolved from 2019 to 2022 through an iterative process of community engagement and City Council work sessions. At the direction of Aspen City Council, the project team is currently drafting a development application for the Lumberyard affordable housing project based on the 100% Schematic Design which was presented to Aspen City Council on May 16, 2022. The project team is scheduled to present a summary of the development application to Aspen City Council at a work session on September 26, 2022. At that time, the project team will request direction from City Council to submit the development application to the Community Development Department to begin the formal land use review and approval process. The project team aims to spend about 20 minutes on September 20, 2022 presenting the attached slides as an update to the Planning & Zoning Commission members. ATTACHMENTS: Exhibit A: Presentation Slides Page 1 of 1 46 Lumberyard Outreach and Design Summary A Community-Driven Design Process Sept 20, 2022 1 of 39 47 Sept 2019 – Feb 2020: Conceptual Design Density “Heat Map” ConceptsOutreach #1 Stakeholder meetings, pop-up events, survey, open houses Council Work Session Outreach #2 Stakeholder meetings & open houses near AABC Council Work Session 2 of 39 48 March 2020 – Dec 2020: Conceptual Design Density Concepts 140, 175 & 215 Units 3-Story Outreach #3 Email, website, survey, social media, web conferences Council Work Session Council Work Session Conceptual Design 310 Units, 3-4 Story 3 of 39 49 Sept 2021 – May 2022: Schematic Design 4 Council Work Sessions Density 310 Units, 100% 4-Story (2 of 8 Versions Shown)Outreach #4 Online Survey & Community Open HouseSchematic Design Options 4 of 39 50 2022 Sept – Nov: Development Application 5 Final Schematic Design Density 277 Units, 467 Bedrooms 100% 4-Story Council Work Session OCTOBER 2022 Outreach #5 Online Survey & Community Open House 5 of 39 51 ASPEN LUMBERYARD CUSHING TERRELL Near-term Timeline OVERALL DEVELOPMENT TIMELINE Mid January - December 2022 Land Use Entitlement Process and Planned Development Documentation May 16, 2022 Present Final Schematic Design to Council Cost Estimation Underway June 3, 2022 Final Schematic Design Package delivered, Project Website updated June - October 2022 Design Development, Land Use Application and Preliminary Budgeting January 2023 – October 2023 Construction Documents October 2023 – January 2024 Bidding February 2024 Construction Start on First Phase 2.0 YOU ARE HERE 2005 2022 2023 2024 ... 20282027202620202019201620112007 City of Aspen Reserves Ability to Develop Housing at 3+ acre “Triangle Parcel” North of BMC West Use of Housing Funds to Purchase BMC West Property 4+ acres Annexation of BMC West Property into Aspen City Limits Lease Assumed by ProBuild/BFS, Extended through 7/31/2025 Community Outreachand Conceptual Design Process Begins Community Outreach, Conceptual DesignTarget of 310 Units,Purchase of 3-acre Mini Storage Property Complete Schematic Design, Submit Development Application forApproval Process Remaining Phases of Housing Construction and Occupancy TBDTarget for First Phase of Housing Construction to Start Target for Occupancy of First Phase of Affordable Housing PD Recording,Construction Documents,Building Permit Application Process Target for Access & Infrastructure Construction Start Parking Alternatives Analysis, Schematic Design Community Outreach, Mini Storage Annexation Application 2021 6 of 39 52 ASPEN LUMBERYARD CUSHING TERRELL We believe that a strong and diverse year-round community and a viable and healthy local workforce are fundamental cornerstones for the sustainability of the Aspen Area community. We are committed to providing affordable housing because it supports: •A stable community that is invested in the present and future of the Aspen Area. •A reliable workforce, also resulting in greater economic sustainability. •Opportunities for people to live in close proximity to where they work. •A reduction in adverse transportation impacts. •Improved environmental sustainability. •A reduction in down valley growth pressures. •Increased citizen participation in civic affairs, non-profit activities and recreation programs. •A better visitor experience, including an appreciation of our genuine, lights-on community. •A healthy mix of people, including singles, families and seniors. City of Aspen - 2012 Aspen Area Community Plan (Housing Section) Vision Philosophy 3.0 VISION The goal of APCHA is to provide affordable housing opportunities through rental and sale to persons who are or have been actively employed or self- employed within Aspen and Pitkin County, and that provide or have provided goods and services to individuals, businesses or institutional operations, within Aspen and Pitkin County (prior to retirement and/or any disability), and other qualified persons as defined in these Regulations, and as they are amended from time to time. Aspen/Pitkin County Housing Authority (2021 APCHA Housing Regulations) Mission Statement 7 of 39 53 ASPEN LUMBERYARD CUSHING TERRELL A stable, thriving affordable neighborhood. Pedestrian friendly, environmentally sustainable, connected, and welcoming. Looks, lives and feels authentically Aspen! VISION STATEMENT 8 of 39 54 ASPEN LUMBERYARD CUSHING TERRELL 3.1 COMMUNITY CONNECTION Defining Community Connection Successful neighborhoods are integrated into the fabric of their communities. A big part of this connection is ensuring ease of access to the diversity of modes of transit that already exist in Aspen. Having the ability to select the appropriate mode of transit based on weather, destination, purpose, or whim allows residents of the Lumberyard to leave their cars parked for incidental travel. A connected community can greatly contribute to well-being and contentment in day-to-day life. What success might look like: •Adequate parking on-site so as not to negatively impact neighboring areas •Pedestrian walkways throughout and connecting to the ABC and existing trails •Maintain and improve the bike paths to the ABC and Annie Mitchell •Vehicular connections to the ABC and Highway 82 with appropriate stacking distances •Space for a possible transit stop •Space for multi-modal transportation alternatives •Spaces allowing neighbors to engage with one another 9 of 39 55 ASPEN LUMBERYARD CUSHING TERRELL Defining Sustainability In working with the City of Aspen Environmental Health & Sustainability department and Community Office for Resource Efficiency (CORE), the design team has defined Sustainability through three pillars: Environment, Economic, and Social. All three are needed to create a strong and long lasting community. Environmental Sustainability - The ability to avoid depletion and degradation of natural resources while allowing for long term environmental quality. Economic Sustainability - The ability of an economy to support an appropriate level of economic capacity and activity to serve societal needs. Social Sustainability - The capacity to create healthy, accessible, livable places for all. What success might look like:Energy •Full Electrified Buildings and Net Zero Energy Site-wide, including on-site storage •Forward-looking Electric Vehicle infrastructure •Leveraging passive solar strategies •Enhanced building commissioning and metering Water •Advanced metering •Low usage building systems and fixtures •Native plantings and xeriscaping Waste & Recycling •C&D waste management and planning •Construction activity pollution prevention Wellness •Healthy and sustainable building materials •Dedicated and filtered fresh air •Increased daylighting and well controlled electric lighting 3.2 SUSTAINABILITY - City of Aspen Climate Plan. As history has shown, Aspen has a civic responsibility to act on behalf of its constituents, a moral imperative to take the steps necessary to meet the challenge of climate change, and the potential to be a catalyst for meaningful and effective action around the state, country and world. 10 of 39 56 ASPEN LUMBERYARD CUSHING TERRELL Defining Pedestrian Friendly 3.3 PEDESTRIAN FRIENDLY The goal of this development is to emphasize people over cars. We know there will be a lot of vehicles housed at the lumberyard along with residents. Strategies that calm traffic and reduce physical conflicts between cars and people will be utilized. Providing landscaping or parallel parking along walkways bordering streets helps provide physical separation. Pedestrian friendly means thoughtfully designed sidewalks. Walkways should be connected and well lit. They should be wide enough to allow people to pass comfortably, especially when pushing strollers, walking dogs, or carrying that particularly heavy bag of groceries. A walkway lined with trees providing dappled shade in the summer makes them inviting places to be. What success might look like: •Tree lined, well-lit sidewalks adjacent to but separated from streets by tree lawns •Sidewalks throughout site that directly connect to adjacent trails •Safe lighting levels at all pedestrian circulation areas throughout site •Maximize solar access at sidewalks and outdoor public spaces •Snow storage areas and awareness of snow shed safety clearances to pedestrian areas 11 of 39 57 ASPEN LUMBERYARD CUSHING TERRELL Defining Living Well At the root of all housing projects, but particularly acute when discussing affordable communities, is the sentiment that everyone deserves a good place to live. What does this mean and how do we get there? Living Well means providing for community members basic needs, but also allowing them the opportunity to thrive and enjoy all the same benefits afforded to all members of the community. At a basic level, Living Well means providing a safe and secure environment. It also means creating an environment that allows for positive physical and mental health. For the sake of this effort the Design Team has categorized items such as indoor air quality, noise and hazard materials under the ‘sustainability’ tag, but it is important to note the interconnectedness. Specific to the way the community members of Aspen at large live, Living Well might mean creating a community that does not preclude or challenge one’s ability to enjoy the natural resources found in abundance in and around the area. 3.4 LIVING WELL What success might look like: •Day-lit indoor spaces with access to views •Adequate storage space for outdoor lifestyle equipment as well as maintenance and repair facilities •Easy access to parking or public transportation when running errands •Quality design & finishes to promote a sense of ownership- Easy access to outdoor spaces •Comfortable spaces to allow for gathering of friends and family •Quiet, efficient and reliable fixtures and equipment •Increased accessibility both on site and within dwellings ASPEN TIMES SKI MAGAZINE 12 of 39 58 ASPEN LUMBERYARD CUSHING TERRELL Defining Authentically Aspen A practical rugged quality that reflects the alpine lifestyle of this historic mining town turned ski destination. SURVEY RESULTS: 3.5 AUTHENTICALLY ASPEN “I think keeping it mountain contemporary in style fits best with the ABC area, the aspen ideal, and the appeal to a broader range of inhabitants”. “...Needs to have mountain appeal due to entrance to Aspen and how many people see this every day”. “Efficiency, efficiency, efficiency. The design should be efficient! Aspen has a long history of building very inefficient and affordable housing units with excess emphasis on ‘custom’ design, ‘no 2 units alike’. Housing resources are limited and outstrip demand.” “Keep the mountain aesthetic 13 of 39 59 ASPEN LUMBERYARD CUSHING TERRELL 4.0 DESIGN UPDATES Timeline NOV. 1, 2021 COUNCIL WORK SESSION: PARKING ALTERNATIVES JAN. 10, 2022 COUNCIL WORK SESSION: UPDATED PARKING ALTERNATIVES FEB. 14, 2022 COUNCIL WORK SESSION: SCHEMATIC DESIGN PROGRESS UPDATE MAY 16, 2022 COUNCIL WORK SESSION: 100% SCHEMATIC DESIGN MARCH 21 & ADDITIONAL COUNCIL WORK SESSION: 75% SCHEMATIC APRIL 4, 2022 DESIGN PROGRESS UPDATE How to Use this Section The Design section of this document will focus on the exploration of how to solve the challenges of the Lumberyard project. Design explorations, such as drawings, are a critical tool in which the team synthesizes information into a relatable format to spur discussion and further exploration, but also to drive consensus. The type and scale of these explorations will be particular to the moment in time within the design process, but will always be specific to conversations and studies necessary to move the project forward. This section will serve a chronology of solutions or possibilities presented to various stakeholder groups. Schematic Design Effort 14 of 39 60 ASPEN LUMBERYARD CUSHING TERRELL TASK AT HAND •11.3 Acre Site •Maximize the number of Affordable Housing Units on site, prioritize Bedroom Count •High Density 25+ Units per acre •Provide on-site resident parking meeting Aspen requirements based on unit count •Combination of Rental and For Sale Units •Phased approach to construction over 10+ years •Sustainable and Resilient Design •Space for Childcare Center on Site •Trail Connectivity •Access to Daylight Views within Housing Units •A Public Transit Stop •Noise Mitigation to adjacent Highway & Airport •Elevator Access to all Housing Units •A Safe and Inviting Pedestrian Experience OUR CHALLENGES 100% SCHEMATIC DESIGN PROGRAM ELEMENTS •Balance of surface and underground parking • Tight spacing between buildings, access to daylight • Concern about building scale, heights and orientation • Noise Mitigation • Innovation through modular design and sustainable building strategies • Demographics of target user mix (i.e. “who is this housing for?”) • Maintain a schedule for construction to begin in 2024 • Finding the balance between competing priorities 1.0 15 of 39 61 88QQLLWW77\\SSHHVV &&RRXXQQWW &&RRXXQQWW &&RRXXQQWW &&RRXXQQWW 2QH%HGURRP 7ZR%HGURRP 7KUHH%HGURRP 77RRWWDDOO88QQLLWW&&RRXXQQWW %%HHGGUURRRRPP&&RRXXQQWW %%XXLLOOGGLLQQJJ%%XXLLOOGGLLQQJJ%%XXLLOOGGLLQQJJ ASPEN LUMBERYARD CUSHING TERRELL 4.2 FINAL SCHEMATIC DESIGN Building Program Rental Ownership Increase Bedroom Count Units Sized Per APCHA Guidelines Aligns with Recommended Mix from Demographic Study Ownership Units Accommodated on South- Site of Site Unit Mix & Count Following previous work sessions, the unit mix and counts have been shuffled to: •Provide ‘Elbow Room’ on site •Prioritize occupant count versus unit count •Correctly size the mix to align with desired demographics •Provide opportunities in floor plans to accommodate building systems 16 of 39 62 0'50 ' 10 0 ' 15 0 ' 20 0 ' 40 0 ' 60 0 ' SCALE 1"=100'-00" NORTH ASPEN LUMBERYARD CUSHING TERRELL 4.2 FINAL SCHEMATIC DESIGN Site Plan KEY Native Revegetation Open Space Rain Garden / Stormwater Community Plaza Future Daycare Facility Vegetated Berm Bldg 1 A i r p o r t B u s i n e s s C e n t e r Hwy 82 Bldg 2 Bldg 3 M.R.A 17 of 39 63 0'50 ' 10 0 ' 15 0 ' 20 0 ' 40 0 ' 60 0 ' SCALE 1"=100'-00" NORTH ASPEN LUMBERYARD CUSHING TERRELL 4.2 FINAL SCHEMATIC DESIGN Vehicular Circulation KEY Bldg 1 A i r p o r t B u s i n e s s C e n t e r Hwy 82 Bldg 2 Bldg 3 M.R.A Two-Way Road Signalized Intersection Eliminated Intersection Garage Entrance Raised Pedestrian Zone Trash Enclosure RFTA Bus Stop Firetruck Turnaround Loading & Drop-Off 18 of 39 64 0'50 ' 10 0 ' 15 0 ' 20 0 ' 40 0 ' 60 0 ' SCALE 1"=100'-00" NORTH ASPEN LUMBERYARD CUSHING TERRELL 4.2 FINAL SCHEMATIC DESIGN Pedestrian Circulation KEY Multi-Use Trail RFTA Bus Stop Shared Bike Lane WeCycle Station Underpass Bike Parking Sidewalk / Foot Path Community PlazaRaised Pedestrian Zone Crosswalk Building Entrance Bldg 1 A i r p o r t B u s i n e s s C e n t e r Hwy 82 Bldg 2 Bldg 3 M.R.A 19 of 39 65 0'50 ' 10 0 ' 15 0 ' 20 0 ' 40 0 ' 60 0 ' SCALE 1"=100'-00" NORTH ASPEN LUMBERYARD CUSHING TERRELL 4.2 FINAL SCHEMATIC DESIGN Parking KEY Underground425 Required & Provided Garage Entrance50% Underground Carport ADA Space Loading & Drop-Off Surface Bldg 1 A i r p o r t B u s i n e s s C e n t e r Hwy 82 Bldg 2 Bldg 3 M.R.A 20 of 39 66 0'50 ' 10 0 ' 15 0 ' 20 0 ' 40 0 ' 60 0 ' SCALE 1"=100'-00" NORTH ASPEN LUMBERYARD CUSHING TERRELL 4.2 FINAL SCHEMATIC DESIGN Phasing Phase 0 Demolition & Recycling of Existing + Access & Infrastructure Including Site Grading, Utilities, Roadways Phase 1 Construct Bldg 1 104 Rental Units Phase 2 Construct Bldg 2 91 Rental Units Phase 3 Construct Bldg 3 82 Ownership Units Bldg 1 A i r p o r t B u s i n e s s C e n t e r Hwy 82 Bldg 2 Bldg 3 M.R.A Phase 1 Phase 2 Phase 3 Phase 0 - Demo & Recycling / Access & Infrastructure 2024-2025 2026-2027 2028-2029 2030-2031 21 of 39 67 ASPEN LUMBERYARD CUSHING TERRELL 4.2 FINAL SCHEMATIC DESIGN Building 2 West Facade at Entry Unit stacking and variation provide natural variety Vegetated and terraced buffers to ground-level patio entries to create privacy and soften base of building Roofs oriented optimally to maximize solar potential Large Roof Overhangs: Increases PV area and provides shelter from the elements Increased glass at communal areas to bring in daylight and views 22 of 39 68 ASPEN LUMBERYARD CUSHING TERRELL 4.2 FINAL SCHEMATIC DESIGN First Floor Patios Boulevard swale provides stormwater treatment and snow storage while also softening road edge Low lying concrete walls to provide privacy but not shield views from the interior out. Privacy panels above helping to separate neighboring patios Informal pathways to patio using pavers and gravel signals that this is no longer public domain Tiered planting to soften base of building and provide separation and privacy between patio and sidewalk 23 of 39 69 ASPEN LUMBERYARD CUSHING TERRELL 4.2 FINAL SCHEMATIC DESIGN Building 1 Amenity Space, Plaza & Courtyard The common amenity spaces are easily accessed by Building 2 residents Pathways seemingly meandering through the site provide flexibility in creating functional connections between buildings or areas of the site The plaza is the gateway upon arrival to the site. The amenity space sitting within becomes the living room for the site; welcoming and gathering the community The circular landscape areas provide for a variety of settings both for residents and the function of the site Transparency in the building common spaces is meant to create a connection inside to out as to invite community members to interact With large overhangs, the green roof of the amenity space provides shelter from the snow as well as a pleasant sight for adjacent upper-floor residents Building is connected to site with roof drainage becoming a feature, draining into the rain garden below 24 of 39 70 ASPEN LUMBERYARD CUSHING TERRELL 4.2 FINAL SCHEMATIC DESIGN Building 1 Floor Plans KEY Circulation Units Support Spaces Common Spaces Lower Level Parking Ground Floor 38,447 SF39,599 SF 198’ 264’ 248’ 69’ 25 of 39 71 ASPEN LUMBERYARD CUSHING TERRELL Ground Floor 28,705 SF 4.2 FINAL SCHEMATIC DESIGN Building 2 Floor Plans Lower Level Parking 29,382 SFKEY Circulation Units Support Spaces Common Spaces 307’ 181’ 26 of 39 72 ASPEN LUMBERYARD CUSHING TERRELL Ground Floor 28,633 SF 4.2 FINAL SCHEMATIC DESIGN 318’ 211’ Building 3 Floor Plans Lower Level Parking 29,371 SFKEY Circulation Units Support Spaces Common Spaces 27 of 39 73 ASPEN LUMBERYARD CUSHING TERRELL 4.2 FINAL SCHEMATIC DESIGN Material Comparison - Exterior Siding 28 of 39 74 ASPEN LUMBERYARD CUSHING TERRELL 4.2 FINAL SCHEMATIC DESIGN Screen Elements Enlarged Shade Structure Elevation Panel Construction South Facing - Winter East/West Facing - Winter South Facing - Summer East/West Facing - Summer Built with low-maintenance species or engineered products. Board materials change in size and orientation to create a varying texture. A series of standardized panels that when varied in their stacking create texture and dynamic interactions. Panels arranged strategically to orient or rotate based on sun position to provide shading and privacy. Panels hung off the face of building with track and clip system. Board material is fastened to the track at its back to conceal the means of attachment giving a floating appearance at its face. PanelType 5 PanelType 1 PanelType 3 PanelType 2 PanelType 4 29 of 39 75 ASPEN LUMBERYARD CUSHING TERRELL 4.3 TECHNICAL STUDIES Transportation Impact Analysis What We Found •The city should construct a traffic signal at the Aspen Lumberyard driveway •The city should provide improved bus service to the Aspen Lumberyard •About half of residents will relocate from down valley housing •Employment opportunities in Aspen will grow with or without the Aspen Lumberyard project •Right after people move into the Aspen Lumberyard, travel times will increase by about one minute during rush hour •By 2025, the project will not significantly further increase travel times on CO 82 •Through improve transit, the city aims to aggressively reduce vehicle trips •The project will reduce CO2 emissions from commuter transportation by 500,000-600,000 pounds per year •Providing housing closer to Aspen will reduce CO2 emissions compared to people living down valley •Investing in transportation services like transit is critical to mitigate the effects of growth on travel times on CO 82 Full report can be found in the appendix 30 of 39 76 ASPEN LUMBERYARD CUSHING TERRELL 4.3 TECHNICAL STUDIES Transportation Impact Analysis Mitigation Measures Multi-modal measures and Transportation Demand Management (TDM) •Install a traffic signal as the CO 82/Aspen Lumberyard Driveway intersection •Operate dedicated transit services to / from the Aspen Lumberyard, options include: •Aspen Lumberyard-dedicated shuttle, •Combine with the Burlingame shuttle, •Buy up additional RFTA service on the Snowmass Village route, and/or •Operate microtransit within the ABC Full report can be found in the appendix 31 of 39 77 ASPEN LUMBERYARD CUSHING TERRELL 4.3 TECHNICAL STUDIES Enterprise Green Communities Certification Update Enterprise Green Communities has a Resilience component which focuses on proactively designing for day-to-day conservation of resources, new climate challenges, hazard mitigation preparedness, and strengthening cultural connections. •The focus on hazard mitigation preparedness requires that we recognize considerations for hazards such as wildfire, air quality, new disease vectors, extreme events, loss of power, drought and mud flows. •The focus on cultural resilience provides mental health benefits such as increased sense of shared ownership, social accountability, and sense of belonging. EGC SCORE: 123pts (40+ Required) MILESTONES COMPLETED TO DATE: •Sustainability Charrette •Context Map •Social Determinants of Health Analysis •Project Priority Survey •Cultural Resilience / Responsive Design Assessment •Multi-Hazard Vulnerability / Climate Resilient Design Assessment 32 of 39 78 ASPEN LUMBERYARD CUSHING TERRELL 4.3 TECHNICAL STUDIES Enterprise Green Communities Resiliency StudyENTERPRISE GREEN COMMUNITIES CERTIFICATION UPDATE Vulnerability Design Response Wildfire Ignition Resistance Construction per 2021 International Wildland-Urban Interface Code (Section 505 Class 2), Intentional Landscaping Air Quality Balanced Ventilation, Enhanced Filtration, Mechanical Cooling New Disease Vectors Integrated Pest Management, Enhanced Filtration Extreme Events Space of Respite, Evacuation Planning, Shelter In Place Strategies, Backup Power for Critical Loads, Snow Removal Site Planning Loss of Power Backup Power for Critical Loads, Passive Survivability Drought Intentional Landscaping Mudflow Site Modification Plan to be Implemented after a Wildfire on Deer Hill Full report can be found in the appendix 33 of 39 79 ASPEN LUMBERYARD CUSHING TERRELL 4.3 TECHNICAL STUDIES 75% Net Zero Update •Designing around a low Energy Use Intensity building •Enhanced insulation and infiltration approaches •Energy efficient heating/cooling systems •Energy efficient water heating systems •Heat recovery systems •Maximizing area of solar array with independent roof structure •Create a comparative energy analysis between different HVAC and Plumbing systems to begin to identify best value •Identified a path forward with Aspen Electric balance production limitations for utility and needs on site using a battery system FXVKLQJWHUUHOOFRP %DVHOLQH2YHUYLHZ •(QYHORSHEDVHGRQ,(&&YDOXHV o 5RRI5 o :DOOV5 o )HQHVWUDWLRQIL[HG86+*& o )HQHVWUDWLRQRSHUDEOH86+*& o ,QILOWUDWLRQ$&+ •+9$& o 95)V\VWHPRQHSHUIORRU o 'HGLFDWHGRXWGRRUDLUV\VWHPVZKHDWUHFRYHU\ •/LJKWLQJ o %XLOGLQJ:IW o 3DUNLQJ*DUDJH:IW •3OXJ/RDGV o (QHUJ\6WDU$SSOLDQFHV5HIULJHUDWRU'LVKZDVKHU(OHFWULF6WRYH2YHQ&ORWKHV:DVKHU9HQWHG&ORWKHV'U\HU0LVF3OXJORDG •'RPHVWLF+RW:DWHU o (OHFWULF5HVLVWDQFH+RW:DWHU+HDWHUV o JDOORQVGD\SHUVRQ We are currently on track to meet our 75% Net Zero Stretch Goal! 34 of 39 80 Maximized Solar Panel Roof Coverage 35 of 39 81 ASPEN LUMBERYARD CUSHING TERRELL 4.3 TECHNICAL STUDIES Air Monitoring Data Report - Air Resource Specialists • The measured concentrations of possible air toxics using 24-hour sampling showed ambient concentrations at safe levels • No air toxics were observed at ambient concentrations that would generate potential adverse health effects via inhalation • It is likely that any volatile organic compounds (VOC’s) impacts are on a much smaller timescale than 24-hour averages can measure • Results are similar to Pitkin County's 2021 study Full report can be found in the appendix City of Aspen Air Monitoring Data Report, Page 10 By Air Resource Specialists, Inc.,April 2022 3.0 MONITORING DATA AND DISCUSSION The following section describes the ambient air quality data collected at the AHP monitoring site using USEPA Compendium Method TO-15.The TO-15 sampling methods were summarized in the prior section and these methods were applied for the collected samples. 3.1 TO-15 Monitoring Data The concentration levels of compounds measured by Method TO-15 at the AHP monitoring site are summarized in Table 3-1.Only those compounds which were detected in one or more of the TO-15 are listed in Table 3-1. If a specific compound was “Not Detected” (ND) in all samples, it is not listed. Table 3-1 AHP TO-15 Air Monitoring Concentrations for Detected Compounds (all data in micrograms per cubic meter) Feb 18 FRI Feb 19 SAT Feb 20 SUN Feb 25 FRI Feb 26 SAT Feb 27 SUN Feb 28 MON Mar 1 TUES Mar 2 WED GRAB RfC Acetone 4.82 7.20 4.66 5.47 4.66 5.56 4.66 3.59 5.99 -- Benzene 0.652 1.83 30 Chloromethane 1.37 1.20 1.45 1.17 1.20 1.28 1.27 1.48 1.25 1.25 90 Cyclohexane 0.857 6000 Ethanol 2.45 35.8 39.8 7.52 2.79 33.0 3.90 8.09 4.07 15.5 -- Trichlorofluoromethane 1.33 1.24 1.48 1.23 1.16 1.24 1.24 1.40 1.29 1.26 -- Dichlorodifluoromethane 2.29 2.28 2.41 2.40 2.42 2.43 2.43 2.65 2.41 2.40 -- Heptane 1.04 -- Methylene Chloride 4.31 3000 Tetrachloroethylene 1.49 1.37 2.22 2.22 40 Toluene 4.41 5000 1,2,4-Trimethylbenzene 1.06 60 m&p-Xylene 2.96 100 o-Xylene 1.07 100 Compounds not listed were below reporting limit on all sample days Not Detected on the sampling day Not all compounds have a USEPA RfC. 36 of 39 82 ASPEN LUMBERYARD CUSHING TERRELL 4.4 DEVELOPMENT FINANCE UPDATE Development Schedule Initial Planning & Design Phase 0 - Site & Infrastructure Phase 1 –Rental Workforce Phase 2 –Rental LIHTC Phase 3 -For -Sale 104 UNITS 91 UNITS 2022 2023 2024 2025 2026 2027 2028 2029 2030 82 UNITS $395.2 Million of Total Investment 276 Housing Units $ 14.2 Million $125.5 Million $115.8 Million $135.2 Million $4.4 Million 4. DEVELOPMENT SCHEDULE DEVELOPMENTFINANCE UPDATE | MAY 16, 2022 37 of 39 83 ASPEN LUMBERYARD CUSHING TERRELL 4.4 DEVELOPMENT FINANCE UPDATE Preliminary Estimate of Potential Funding SourcesDEVELOPMENTFINANCE UPDATE | MAY 16, 2022 $395.2 Million ESTIMATE ONLY - NOT FINAL 38 of 39 84 ASPEN LUMBERYARD CUSHING TERRELL WHERE WE ARE GOING Our Ask of You Today Moving Forward Is the design approach represented in Schematic Design acceptable to use as the basis of the Development Application? Are there any specific areas Council would like the Design Team to prioritize in Design Development? What areas of the design would Council like input on moving into Design Development? 100% Schematic Design May - June 2022 Development Application - Draft in Process - Summary Review Sept 26, 2022 City Council - Community Feedback October-November - Submit to Comm Dev. Early November 2022 - Public Hearings Early 2023 Design Development June - October 2022 YOU ARE HERE 2022 2027 2028 ...20242023 2025 Complete Schematic Design, Submit Development Application forApproval Process Remaining Phases of Housing Construction and Occupancy TBDTarget for First Phase of Housing Construction to Start Target for Occupancy of First Phase of Affordable Housing PD Recording,Construction Documents,Building Permit Application Process Target for Access & Infrastructure Construction Start Land Use Process Major Public Project Review • Planned Development • Subdivision • Rezoning • Growth Management • Transportation & Parking • Residential Design Standards Two-Step Process • Step One - P & Z Recommendation to City Council • Step Two - City Council, First and Second Reading (includes detailed review) 39 of 39 85