The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink Aboutagenda.hpc.20011010ASPEN HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION October 10, 2001 REGULAR MEETING, 5:00 p.m. COUNCIL CHAMBERS SITE VISITS - NOON - 5:00 I. Roll call II. Approval of minutes - Sept. 12th 2001 III. Public Comments IV. Commission member comments V. Disclosure of conflict of interest (actual and apparent) VI. Project Monitoring - Assign a monitor for 935 E. Cooper VII. OLD BUSINESS (Note: Next resolution will be #45.) A. 433 W. Main, Innsbruck, Conceptual Review, Public Hearing (20â€¢44 *, b'*7110 ve,1 La,U 9 3,4 +f* Â£76 VED rSÂ·<D (\Pâ‚¬ .25 ~B. 41-Wagner Park.Public Facilities - Final Review. Public Hearin ~(1-8-14~Â» 1 , /1,49Â»+4 460.f 6b~Â«-00,-Aill*h s'-0 4- a. 5:35 jC. 46 101 E. Hallam Street - Final Review and Variances, Public Hearing 6:00 D.0 205 S. Third Street - Final Review Public Â¤earing lefeareD 47- O 6:25 E. / 135 W. Hopkins - Clarificatiop,of motion made on Sept 26, 2001 Airvt,112Â» (6 - O 6:30 F. 735 W. Bleeker/106 N. Seventh - Final Review, Minor Review, Variances (To bMEnoticed) )24110,~ aÂ¢Ip d,ko--A-i VIII. NEW BUSINESS 6:35 A. 4// 419 E. Cooper Ave. - Minor - Public Hearing 6:45 B. 49 411 E. Hyman Ave. - Minor - Public Hearing 90 IX. ADJOURN P1 PROJECT MONITORING Suzannah Reid 414 N. First- POLE 312 S. Galena 78 and Main 330 Lake Avenue 620 W. Bleeker Historical Society 328 Park Ave. - Lane 515 Gillespie Jeffrey Halferty 414 N. First- POLE 920 W. Hallam- Guthrie 312 S. Galena 620 W. Bleeker - Historical Society 213 W. Bleeker 200 E. Bleeker 328 Park Ave. - Lane 209 S. Galena 332 W. Main Lisa Markalunas 939 E. Cooper- Langley 200 E. Bleeker 302 E. Hopkins 110 W. Main 104 S. Galena - St. Mary's Church 620 W. Bleeker 214 E. Hopkins Gilbert Sanchez 312 S. Galena 333 W. Bleeker Street 501 W. Main Christiania Lodge 330 Lake Ave. 609 W. Bleeker- Ernie Frywald 200 E. Bleeker 214 E. Hopkins Rally Dupps 501 W. Main Street - Christiania Lodge 129 W. Francis 435 W. Main 104 S. Galena St. Mary's Church 302 E. Hopkins P2 610 W. Smuggler ~elanie Roschko Teresa Melville 513 W. Bleeker 515 Gillespie Neil Hirst 450 S. Galena CONCEPTUAL APPROVALS WHICH HAVE NOT GONE TO FINAL: HPC Legal Procedures (Submit affidavit of notice for PH - conceptual) Swear In Staffpresentation Applicant presentation //pard Questions and Clarifications ~01Â·I opened and closed Board Comments Applicant Comments Motion 0 P3 r-imm-~ AFFIDAVIT OF PUBLIC NOTICE REQUIRED BY SECTION 26.304.060 (E), ASPEN LAND USE CODE ADDRESS OF PROPERTY: 23-9 W. 8 Ce )21 51- , Aspen, CO SCHEDULED PUBLIC HEARING DATE: 10 ~/ l 0 k 1 , 200- STATE OF COLORADO ) ) SS. County of Pitkin ) I, $4 1.il-,42-5 lJMroff- (name, please print) being or representing an Applicant to the City ofAspen, Colorado, hereby personally certify that I have complied with the public notice requirements of Section 26.304.060 (E) of the Aspen Land Use Code in the following manner: /4~ Publication 4-notice: By the publication in the legal notice section of an official paper or a paper ofgeneral circulation in the City of Aspen at least fifteen (15) days prior to the public hearing. A copy ofthe publication is attached hereto. 0 Posting ofnotice: By posting of notice, which form was obtained from the Community Development Department, which was made o f suitable, waterproof materials, which was not less than twenty-two (22) inches wide and twenty-six (26) inches high, and which was composed of letters not less than one inch in height. Said notice was posted at least ten (10) days prior to the public hearing and was continuously visible from the day of , 200 , to and including the date and time of the public headng. A photograph of the posted notice (sign) is attached hereto. Mailing of notice. By the mailing of a notice obtained from the Community Development Department, which contains the information described in Section 26.304.060(E)(2) of the Aspen Land Use Code. At least ten (10) days prior to the public hearing, notice was hand delivered or mailed by first class, postage prepaid U.S. mail to all owners ofproperty within three hundred (300) feet of the property subject to the development application, and, at least fifteen (15) days prior to the public hearing, notice was hand delivered or mailed by first class postage prepaid U.S. mail to any federal agency, state, county, municipal government, school, service district or other governmental or quasi-governmental agency that owns property within three hundred (300) feet ofthe property subject to the development application. The names and addresses ofproperty owners shall be those on the current tax records of Pitkin County as they appeared no more than sixty (60) days prior to the date ofthe public hearing. A copy ofthe owners and governmental agencies so noticed is attached hereto. (continued on next page) Â·ke /0 11+ 2 Rezoning or text amendment. Whenever the official zoning district map is in any way to be changed or amended incidental to or as part of a general revision o f this Title, or whenever the text o f this Title is to be amended, whether such revision be made by repeal of this Title and enactment of a new land use regulation, or otherwise, the requirement of an accurate survey map or other sufficient legal description of, and the notice to and listing ofnames and addresses of owners o f real property in the area o f the proposed change shall be waived. However, the proposed zoning map has been available for public inspection in the planning agency during all business hours for fifteen (15) days prior to the public hearing on such amendments. â‚¬27~t.Â«dA=jfcotif ,@4nature The foregoing "Affidavit of Notice" was acknowledged before me this day of , 200_,by PUBLIC NOTICE RE: THE INNSBRUCK INN CONCEFrUAL HPC & WITNESS MY HAND AND OFFICIAL SEAL PARTIAL DEMOLmON EXEMPTION NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that a public hearing will be held on Wednesday, October'10, 2001 at a meeting to begin at 5:00 p.m. before the Aspen My commission expires: Historic Preservation Commission, City Council Chambers, City Hall, 130 S. Gatena St.,Aspen, to consider an application submitted by Innsbruck Holdings LLC. requesting Conceptual HPC design approval to expand the Innsbruck Inn. The applicantÂ·is also requesting a partial demo- Notary Public lition exemption from the HPC. The property is located at 233 W Main St. and is legally described as Lots A-E, Block 52,0 City and Townsite of Aspen. For further information, contact Chri#Bendon at the Aspen/Pitkin.Community Development Department, 130 S. Galena Stâ€ž Aspen, CO (970) 920-5072. s/Suzannah Reid, Chair' ~ Aspen Historic Preservation Commission Published In The Aspen Times September 22, al~ (3556) .- ATTACHMENTS: COPY OF THE PUBLICATION PHOTOGRAPH OF THE POSTED NOTICE (SIGN) LIST OF THE OWNERS AND GOVERNMENTAL AGENCIES NOTICED BY MAIL AFFIDAVIT OF PUBLIC NOTICE REQUIRED BY SECTION 26.304.060 (E), ASPEN LAND USE CODE 0-34~n bbY CAL. \07--R-W k9 ADDRESS OF PROPERTY: 33&3 400 W MAA 5-r. , Aspen, CO SCHEDULED PUBLIC HEARING DATE: Oc-roeeÂ£ 10 , 200L STATE OF COLORADO ) ) SS. County of Pitkin ) I, (name, please print) Mar# 146 , being or representing an Applicant to the City of Aspen, Colorado, hereby personally certify that I have complied with the public notice requirements of Section 26.304.060 (E) of the Aspen Land Use Code in the following manner: â€¢1~* Publication ofnotice: By the publication in the legal notice section of an official paper or a paper of general circulation in the City of Aspen at least fifteen (15) days prior to the public headng. A copy of the publication is attached hereto. 9IS~01 posting qfnotice: By posting of notice, which form was obtained from the Community Development Department, which was made of suitable, waterproof materials, which was not less than twenty-two (22) inches wide and twenty-six (26) inches high, and which was composed of letters not less than one inch in height. Said notice was posted at least ten (101,ilays pr; a. +- .1, a .... 1.14 , hearing and was continuously visible from the 189:%lay of , 200 9 , to and including the date and time of the public heanng. A pnorograph of the posted notice (sign) is attached hereto. 9 <20~01Mailing qfnotice. By the mailing of a notice obtained from the Community Development Department, which contains the information described in Section 26.304.060(E)(2) ofthe Aspen Land Use Code. At least ten (10) days prior to the public hearing, notice was hand delivered or mailed by first class, postage prepaid U.S. mail to all owners of property within three hundred (300) feet of the property subject to the development application, and, at least fifteen (15) days prior to the public hearing, notice was hand delivered or mailed by first class postage prepaid U.S. mail to any federal agency, state, county, municipal government, school, service district or other governmental or quasi-governmental agency that owns property within three hundred (300) feet of the property subject to the development application. The names and addresses of property owners shall be those on the current tax records of Pitkin County as they appeared no more than sixty (60) days prior to the date of the public hearing. A copy ofthe owners and governmental agencies so noticed is attached hereto. (continued on next page) PUBLIC NOTICE ./ PLFCE PURPOSE 9-Z5-01 . - 7 . O 44 Rezoning or text amendment. Whenever the official zoning district map is in any way to be changed or amended incidental to or as part of a general revision of this Title, or whenever the text of this Title is to be amended, whether such revision be made by repeal of this Title and enactment of a new land use regulation, or otherwise, the requirement of an accurate survey map or other sufficient legal description of, and the notice to and listing of names and addresses of owners of real property in the area of the proposed change shall be waived. However, the proposed zoning map has been available for public inspection in the planning agency during all business hours for fifteen (15) days prior to the public hearing on such amendments. ~ Signatute l- - NI~ The foregoing "Affidavit of Notice" was acknowledged before me this / 0 day of O 2-im-6-64, , 200Â£, by (Yli 4 cle / 1 Has . ql.3119<, WITNESS MY HAND AND OFFICIAL SEAL O ........ 4 0.470 jo My comIdssion expims'. 25-4,42~00 Â¢ 0 -5.31 ./Lu*_g-g /1 -1/ 4/E OF Odv Notary Public ' '~ 0 . ATTACHMENTS: COPY OF THE PUBLICATION PHOTOGRAPH OF THE POSTED NOTICE (SIGN) LIST OF THE OWNERS AND GOVERNMENTAL AGENCIES NOTICED BY MAIL 0 I - I PUBLIC NOTICE RE: THE INNSBRUCK INN CONCEPTUAL HPC & PARTIAL DEMOLITION EXEMPTION NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that a public hearing will be held on Wednesday, October 10, 2001 at a meeting to begin at 5:00 p.m. before the Aspen Historic Preservation Commission, City Council Chambers, City Hall, 130 S. Galena St., Aspen, to consider an application submitted by Innsbruck Holdings LLC, requesting Conceptual HPC design approval to expand the Innsbruck Inn.* The applicant is also requesting a partial demolition exemption from the HPC. The property is located at 233 W. Main St. and is legally described as Lots A-E, Block 52, City and Townsite of Aspen. For further information, contact Chris Bendon at the Aspen/Pitkin Community Development Department, 130 S. Galena St., Aspen, CO (970) 920-5072. s/Suzannah Reid. Chair Aspen Historic Preservation Commission Published in the Aspen Times on September 22, 2001 City of Aspen Account 4-Qi fgpibe*L HAS eaah REVISED -12> fACLODE qg P-â‚¬ 1, Alte N- 2 IMS BEEÂ» WMAOR,4,1.1. tilkst 1 [,Wowes -nte AC)17,-no,1 OF 4 LoOee ADÂ©AeÂ» 4.9 1 EMplotÂ¢â‚¬E 91;*U.l.16 Tb -IHE 'disr Stos op mle: SrRUOTURE. ALG SECOND QUAL PERS RES TRUST ASPEN HOMEOWNERS' ASSOCIATION 135 HOPKINS LTD C/O GILDENHORN ALMA L A COLO NON PROFIT CORPORATION 6476 MIMOSA LN 311 W MAIN ST 2030 24TH ST NW ~6~AS. TX 75230 ASPEN, CO 81611 WASHINGTON, DC 20008 ASPEN MAIN LP BERNSTEIN ARNOLD A & POLLY A BLAU SETH J C/O MR H SCHMIDT LIVING TRST BLAU JUDITH PO BOX 2768 CO ARNOLD A & POLLY A BERNSTEIN 3896 DOGWOOD LN ASPEN, CO 81612 1870 JACKSON ST #304 DOYLESTOWN, PA 18901 SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94109 BRAFMAN STUART REVOCABLE TRUST BLONIARZ JOHN W & DONNA L BROWDE DAVID A BRAFMAN LOTTA BEA REVOCABLE 1839 N ORLEANS ST 176 BROADWAY STE 7A TRUST NEW YORK, NY 10038 CHICAGO, IL 60614 161 E CHICAGO #30B CHICAGO, IL 60611 BUCHHOLZ EARL H & MARILYN E BUDINGER WILLIAM & PEYTON CHAMBERS PETE CO SWAIM BROWN & ELLIOTT PA 2306 DELAWARE AVE PO BOX 10086 PO BOX 6404 MULONN, VA 22106 WILMINGTON, DE 19806 SPARTANBURG, SC 29304 CHISHOLM EDITH 1/2 INT CLICK JANE COLORADO AZURE LTD 205 W MAIN ST 333 W MAIN ST PO BOX 11236 ASPEN, CO 81611 ASPEN, CO 81611 ASPEN, CO 81612 ~ER CANDIDA E CONNER WILLIAM E 11 LIVING TRUST CRETE ASSOCIATES LP 198'16 GRAND VIEW DR 264 VILLAGE BLVD STE 104 3418 SANSON STREET TOPANGA, CA 90290-3314 INCLINE VILLAGE, NV 89451 PHILADELPHIA, PA 19104 CRETE ASSOCIATES LP CRUSIUS FRANKLIN G CROWLEY SUE MITCHELL C/O UNIVERSITY CITY HOUSING CO CRUSIUS MARGARET J 409 S GREENWOOD AVE PO BOX 1524 5855 MIDNIGHT PASS RD APT 507 COLUMBIA, MO 65203 BRYNMAWR, PA 19010 SARASOTA, FL 34242 DEAN FAMILY LIMITED PARTNERSHIP DE WOLF NICHOLAS DEREVENSKY PAULA LLLP 233 W BLEEKER ST 1128 GRAND AVE 590 DELLWOOD AVE ASPEN, CO 81611 GLENWOOD SPRINGS, CO 81601 BOULDER, CO 80301 DIMITRIUS RALLI DEROSE V F DHM INVESTMENTS LP 90% HUEBNER-DIMITRIUS JO-ELLAN 1209 N 14TH AVE 15 INMAN CIR NE 200 S SIERRA MADRE BLVD MELROSE PARK, IL 60160 ATLANTA, GA 30309 PASADENA, CA 91109 DURANT AND ORIGINAL ASSOCIATES ~~*ELLI ROBERT A & SUSAN J FARLAND MARISA J INC ~0/ASHINGTON DR PO BOX 3542 PO BOX 7846 C~TERPORT, NY 11721 ASPEN, CO 81612 ASPEN, CO 81612 GOLD RANDAL S FLECK KATHRYN FRANKEL KATHY REVOCABLE TRUST EPSTEIN GILBERT AND MOLLIE 27 N MOORE TOWER B 444 N WELLS #303 PO BOX 9813 YORK, NY 10013 CHICAGO, IL 60610 ASPEN, CO 81612 HANSEN WERNER AND HARRIET GROSVENOR DENIS GUERRA DONNA WINTER ERNST & SON INC CO PO BOX 3071 4220 GLENWOOD AVE ORDINGER WEG. 12 ASPEN, CO 81612 DALLAS, TX 75205 HAMBURG GERMANY, 22609 HITE HENRY H & ANGELA R HUGGIN H SCOTT INNSBRUCK HOLDINGS LLC PO BOX 155 205 S MILL ST #1 435 E MAIN ST WOODY CREEK, CO 81656 ASPEN, CO 81611-1978 ASPEN, CO 81611 JACOBY FAMILY LTD PARTNERSHIP KARP MICHAEL KASPAR THERESA DOSS CASPER J JACOBY 111 PO BOX 1637 3418 SANSOM ST PO BOX 248 ASPEN, CO 81612 PHILADELPHIA, PA 19102 ALTON, IL 62002 KEIM JAMES T KING LOUISE LLC KETTELKAMP GRETTA M PEITZ H QUINN JR A COLORADO LIMITED LIABILITY CO 3408 MORRIS AVE 17550 BAR X RD PO BOX 1467 PUEBLO, CO 81008 COLORADO SPRINGS, CO 80908-1500 BASALT, CO 81621 ENTERPRISES INC MARTIN SCOTT M MARTEN RANDOLPH RADO CORPORATION C/O PARAMOUNT PICTURES 129 MARTEN ST 233 W BLEEKER 5555 MELROSE AVE MONDOVI, WI 54755 ASPEN, CO 81611 HOLLYWOOD, CA 90038 MOUNTAIN STATES COMMUNICATIONS MCDONALD FAMILY TRUST MELTON DAVID INC 320 W MAIN ST 135 W MAIN ST PO BOX E ASPEN, CO 81611 ASPEN, CO 81611 ASPEN, CO 81612 PEITZ H QUINN JR NEWKAM CLAIRE M OLIVER WILLIAM THOMAS & ANN GARY KEIM JAMES T PO BOX 2808 542 WARNER AVE 17550 BAR X RD ASPEN, CO 81612 LOS ANGELES, CA 90024 COLORADO SPRINGS, CO 80908-1500 POTAMKIN ALAN PRICE DOUGLAS L AND VALERIE RICKEL DAVID 1 CASUARINA CONCOURSE 8611 MELWOOD RD 8324 BROODSIDE RD CORAL GABLES, FL 33143 BETHESDA, MD 20817 ELKINS PARK, PA 19027 R INC ROGERS REGINA ROSENTHAL DIANNE .ESCENT CT STE 1320 6 WOOD ACRES RD PO BOX 10043 .__AS, TX 75201 GLEN HEAD, NY 11545 ASPEN, CO 81612-7311 b 1 SAMIOS CAROLE SAUNDERS MARGARET W SCHELLING RONALD L & LORI L SAMIOS NICHOLAS A 24523 BRITTANY 231 ENCINO AVE P O BOX 867 SAN ANTONIO, TX 74609 PLAINFIELD, IL 60544 TMINSTER, MD 21158 SHEEHAN WILLIAM J AND SILVERSTEIN PHILIP SEVEN SEAS INVESTMENT LLC SHEEHAN NANCY E SILVERSTEIN ROSALYN 1017 ELMWOOD AVE 25 KNOLLS CRESCENT 10 GOLF VIEW LN WILMETTE, IL 60091 BRONX, NY 10463 FRANKFORT, IL 60423 SLOVITER DAVID SIMON LOUIS & EILEEN SLOVITOR DAVID AND ELAINE SLOVITER ROSALIE 1576 CLOVERLY LN 1358 ROBIN HOOD RD 1358 ROBINHOOD RD RYDAL, PA 19046 MEADOWBROOK, PN 19046 MEADOWBROOK, PA 19046 SMITH CHRISTOPHER H SMITH CHRISTOPHER H SMITH CHRISTOPHER BEUTTAS DIANA H BEUTTAS DIANA H PO BOX 130 PO BOX 12366 234 WEST HOPKINS AVENUE SNOWMASS, CO 81654 ASPEN, CO 81612 ASPEN, CO 81611 TAD PROPERTIES LTD LLC TEMPKINS HARRY TAD PROPERTIES LTD LIABILITY CO TOWNE CENTRE PROPERTIES LLC TEMPKINS VIVIAN PO BOX 9978 420 LINCOLN RD STE 258 323 W MAIN ST #301 ASPEN, CO 81612 MIAMI BEACH, FL 33139 ASPEN, CO 81611 ERG KATHARINE TORNARE RENE TWIN COASTS LTD MAIN ST 308 W HOPKINS AVE 110 WEST C ST STE 1901 ASPEN, CO 81611 ASPEN, CO 81611 SAN DIEGO, CA 92101 VAUGHAN HEIDI 1996 TRUST WALGREEN JOANNE WEESE KATE B IRREV TRUST NO 2 N2322 SYLVAN LN 2258 N FREMONT 314 W WILLOW RD LAKE GENEVA, WI 54137 CHICAGO, IL 60614 CHICAGO, IL 60614 WILLE O LOUIS & FRANCES LYNETTE WHYTE RUTH WiLLE RAOUL 32% INT PO BOX 202 200 W MAIN ST 200 W MAIN ST ASPEN, CO 81612 ASPEN, CO 81611 ASPEN, CO 81611 WILLIAMS DAVID & BONNIE JO 222 W HOPKINS AVE APT 5 ASPEN, CO 81611-1757 II 4 MEMORANDUM TO: Aspen Historic Preservation Commission THRU: Joyce Ohlson, Deputy Planning Director Amy Guthrie, Historic Preservation Officer FROM: Chris Bendon, Senior Planner ~ <AAAA unwv j RE: Innsbruck Inn Redevelopment - Public Hearing J 33 N , Mat, 4 Conceptual Development Exemption from Partial Demolition DATE: October 10, 2001 SUMMARY: The Innsbruck Inn is a non- ~ designated building within the Main Street ~ + Historic District. The applicant has applied for L an expansion of the lodge to accommodate F=*~t .~ *zed *=,.,.~ Lodge Preservation (LP) Program. The LP .8...IN//8/'llimi/,2.'liall.al program allows for individual lodge properties to ~ adjust their zoning specific to their circumstance -ual---11111 -4.~.~ through a Minor Planned Unit Development ~ process. This process requires hearings before ~ the Planning and Zoning Commission and City Â¢Â·179;IR.Jix:Jite/Stiwgall)%/il-timmmwlmilillillillillilill Council. . g ' -1.-,11 Conceptual Approval from the Historic Preservation Commission is the necessary first step in this process. This HPC review will establish the appropriate massing, height, scale, and architectural character of the project. This will help the P&Z and City Council review the PUD application and determine the appropriate zoning dimensions for the project. The applicant has significantly revised the application and is no longer proposing a new third floor. The addition to the west side of the building is now the entire proposed development and staff continues to have little concern about this expansion. The addition is proposed in the same character as the existing structure and is expected to have minimal impact upon the Main Street Historic District. The proposal complies with the Historic Preservation Design Guidelines. Staff is recommending approval of the Conceptual Development Plan and Exemption from the Partial Demolition Standards. APPLICANT: Innsbruck Holdings, LLC. Represented by Mitch Haas, Haas Land Planning, and Dave Gibson, Gibson Architects. 1 P5 PARCEL ID: 2735.124.54.001 ADDRESS: 233 West Main Street ~ ZONING: Office (O), Main Street Historic District CURRENT AND PROPOSED LAND USE: Lodge SIGNIFICANT DEVELOPMENT (CONCEPTUAL) No approval for any development in the "H," Historic Overlay District, or involving historic landmarks shall be granted unless the Historic Preservation Commission finds that all of the following standards (Section 26.415.010.C.5) are met: a. The proposed development is compatible in general design, scale, site plan, massing and volume with designated historic structures located on the parcel and with development on adjacent parcels when the subject site is in an "H," Historic Overlay District, or is adjacent to an historic landmark For historic landmarks where proposed development would extend into front yard, side yard and rear yard setbacks, extend into the minimum distance between buildings on the lot, exceed the allowed floor area by up to five hundred (500) square feet, or exceed the allowed site covered by up to five (5) percent, HPC may grant necessary variances after making a finding that such variation is more compatible in character with the historic landmark and the neighborhood than would be development in accord with dimensional requirements. In no event shall variations pursuant to this Section exceed those variations allowed under Section 26.520.040(B)(2), for detached accessory dwelling units. Staff Finding: The applicant is proposing an extension o f the building to the west in the same form and character as the existing building. The following categories of analysis have been provided: Massing: The proposed expansion continues the same massing as the current structure. Architectural Character: The addition is consistent with the Chalet style of the existing building. The building, however, is not listed on the Inventory of Historic Sites and Structures and deviating from the existing architectural character is not necessarily discouraged. Historic Design Guidelines: This building is 34 years old and not listed on the Inventory of Historic Sites and Structures. The Historic Preservation Design Guidelines section concerning the Main Street Historic District provides advice in several aspects o f development. 2 P6 The Goal ofthe Guidelines Section addressing Main Street states: The primary period of significance for Main Street is the mining era in Aspen. The primary goal is to preserve this character while accommodating compatible changes. In addition, individual buildings from later periods may also be of historic significance and should be preserved. Further describing the goals for Main Street, the Guidelines state: A similarity of building forms also contributes to a sense of visual continuity along Main Street. In order to maintain this feature, a new building should have basic roof and building forms that are similar to those seen traditionally. . . In each case, the roof pitch, its materials, size, and orientation are all important to the overall character of the building. . . New structures and their roofs should be similar in character to their historic neighbors. The following guideline may help the HPC in reviewing this project: 12.15 (Building Scale) On larger structures, subdivide larger masses into smaller "modules" that are similar in size to single family residences or Victorian era commercial buildings seen traditionally on Main Street. o Other, subordinate modules may be attached to the primary building form. c Each identifiable mass should have its own entrance. Staff believes the proposed addition is highly compatible with the character of the existing building. Differentiating this addition from the existing portion may actually detract from the overall design of the building. Staff believes the proposal meets Design . Guidelines. b. The proposed development reflects and is consistent with the character of the neighborhood of the parcel proposed for development. Staff Finding: The block face consists of the Innsbruck Inn and two historic residential buildings to the east. The scale and massing o f the existing Innsbruck Inn does not reflect and is not consistent with the scale and massing of its immediate neighbors. Main Street, however, is characterized by this eclectic mix of building types, sizes, and uses. To that extent, the existing Innsbruck is consistent with the eclectic mix o f the neighborhood and of the District. The Historic Preservation Guidelines recognize that lodges are anomalies in the District. They should not be remodeled into Victorian-style buildings, but must not be expanded in a way that detracts significantly from the characteristics of the 19th Century structures within the District. The proposed addition to the Innsbruck is substantially consistent with the existing building and staff believes this criterion has been met. c. The proposed development enhances or does not detract from the historic significance of designated historic structures located on the parcel proposed for development or on adjacent parcels. 3 P7 Staff Finding: The parcel is not identified as a historic resource and, therefore, the redevelopment of the site will not |~ detract from historic resources on the I f subject parcel. The adjacent parcel to the east is a Historic Landmark developed to the shared property line. The proposed development is limited to the western portion of the lot and staff 4 -~... does not believe the character of the adjacent landmark will be negatively affected. , ..a.--awaigt:AL - .4-4=-94 -7*LE j =.14-11-- - d. The proposed development . enhances or does not diminish v ~ Pli~f: Or detract from the - Â¥ 4 architectural character and integrity of a designated 4 >11/ historic structure or part . thereof. s 2,4... ' Staff Finding: The subject parcel is.' ~ not listed as a historic resource and the proposed development will not effect I -3 11 11't'11 111 1 1 the character of designated historic resources. EXEMPTION FROM PARTIAL DEMOLITION The demolition, partial demolition, off-site relocation, on-site relocation, or temporary relocation of a structure located within an "H," Historic Overlay District, may be exempt from meeting the applicable standards in Section 26.415.020(B), (C), (D), (E) or (F) if the Historic Preservation Commission finds that the following conditions have been met: m The structure is not identified on the Inventory of Historic Sites and Structures. Staff Finding: The property is not listed on the Inventory. b. The structure is considered to be non-contributing to the historic district. c. The structure does not contribute to the overall character of the historic district, and its demolition, partial demolition, off-site relocation, on-site relocation, or temporary relocation does not impact the character Of the historic district. 4 P8 Staff Finding: The Innsbruck is a prominent building and contributes to the identity of Main Street. The building is not listed on the inventory of Historic Structures and 0 the Architectural Inventory Form (completed in June, 2000) does not describe this building as contributing to the overall character of the Historic District. While this is a prominent building affecting Main Street, the building has not been identified as important to the character of the Historic District and staff believes this criterion is met. i The demolition, partial demolition, off-site relocation, on-site relocation or temporary relocation is necessaly for the redevelopment of the parcel Staff Finding: The partial demolition is necessary to accommodate the redevelopment proposed. e. The redevelopment or new development is reviewed by the Historic Preservation Commission pursuant to Section 26.415.010. Staff Finding: The applicant has applied for Significant Development Review. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends the Conceptual Development Plan and Exemption from Partial Demolition Standards be approved. 0 RECOMMENDED MOTION "I move to approve Resolution _, Series of 2001, approving the Conceptual Development Plan and Exemption from Partial Demolition Standards for the Innsbruck Inn Expansion." EXHIBITS: A. Revised Application (Note: The application may still have some references to the third floor expansion. Those should be ignored.) 0 5 P9 RESOLUTION OF THE ASPEN HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION APPROVING AN APPLICATION FOR CONCEPTUAL DEVELOPMENT AND EXEMPTION FROM PARTIAL DEMOLITION FOR AN EXPANSION OF THE INNSBRUCK INN LODGE, 233 WEST MAIN STREET, LOTS A, B, C, D, AND E, BLOCK 52, CITY AND TOWNSITE OF ASPEN, PITKIN COUNTY, COLORADO. Parcel ID #2735.124.54.001 RESOLUTION NO. , SERIES OF 2001 WHEREAS, the applicant, Innsbruck Holdings LLC, represented by Mitch Haas of Haas Land Planning and Dave Gibson of Gibson Architects, has requested conceptual development approval and an exemption from the partial demolition standards to accommodate an expansion of the Innsbruck Inn, a non-designated building within the Main Street Historic District located at 233 West Main Street, lots A, B, C, D, and E, Block 52, City and Townsite ofAspen, Colorado; and, WHEREAS, all development in an "H," Historic Overlay District or development involving a historic landmark must meet all four Development Review Standards of Section 26.415.010.B.4 of the Aspen Land Use Code in order for HPC to grant approval, namely: 1. Standard: The proposed development is compatible in general design, massing and volume, scale and site plan with designated historic structures located on the parcel and with development on adjacent parcels when the subject site is in a "H," Historic Overlay District or is adjacent to an Historic Landmark. For Historic Landmarks where proposed development would extend into front yard, side yard and rear yard setbacks, extend into the minimum distance between buildings on the lot or exceed the allowed floor area by up to five hundred (500) square feet or the allowed site coverage by up to five (5) percent, HPC may grant such variances after making a finding that such variation is more compatible in character with the historic landmark and the neighborhood, than would be development in accord with dimensional requirements. In no event shall variations pursuant to this section exceed those variations allowed under the Cottage Infill Program for detached accessory dwelling units pursuant to Section 26.520. 2. Standard: The proposed development reflects and is consistent with the character of the neighborhood of the parcel proposed for development. P10 0 3. Standard: The proposed development enhances or does not detract from the historic significance of designated historic structures located on the parcel proposed for development or on adjacent parcels. 4. Standard: The proposed development enhances or does not diminish from the architectural character or integrity of a designated historic structure or part thereof; and WHEREAS, development within the "H" Historic Overlay District may be exempted form the standards of demolition and partial demolition upon determination by the Historic Preservation Commission that the following criteria are met: a. Standard: The structure is not identified on the Inventory of Historic Sites and Structures. b. Standard: The structure is considered to be non-contributing to the historic district. c. Standard: The structure does not contribute to the overall character ofthe historic district, and its demolition, partial demolition, off-site relocation, on-site relocation, or temporary relocation does not impact the character of the historic district. d. Standard: The demolition, partial demolition, off-site relocation, on-site 0 relocation or temporary relocation is necessary for the redevelopment of the parcel. e. Standard: The redevelopment or new development is reviewed by the Historic Preservation Commission pursuant to Section 26.415.010. WHEREAS, Chris Bendon, in his staff report dated October 10, 2001, performed an analysis of the application based on the standards, and recommended approval of the application; and, WHEREAS, at a duly noticed public hearing and regular meeting on October 10, 2001, the Historic Preservation Commission considered the application, comments made by the applicant, comments offered by the general public, found the application to meet the standards, and approved the application, by a vote of_ to _ L_-_D. THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED: That the HPC approves conceptual development and exemption from the standards of partial demolition for the Innsbruck Inn Expansion, 233 West Main Street lots A, B, C, D, and E, Block 52, City and Townsite of Aspen, Colorado, finding that the review standards are met. 0 Pll APPROVED BY THE COMMISSION at its regular meeting on the 10th day of October, 2001. Approved as to Form: David Hoefer, Assistant City Attorney Approved as to Content: HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION Suzannah Reid, Chairman ATTEST: Kathy Strickland, Chief Deputy Clerk P12 1[r â‚¬) MEMORANDUM TO: Aspen Historic Preservation Commission THRU: Julie Ann Woods, Community Development Director Joyce Ohlson, Deputy Planning Director FROM: Amy Guthrie, Historic Preservation Officer RE: 101 E. Hallam Street and 105 E. Hallam Street- Final Development and Variances - Public Hearing DATE: October 10, 2001 SUMMARY: The project involves making minor changes to an existing addition to the historic house at 101 E. Hallam Street, and demolishing a shed on the alley. Conceptual approval, partial demolition, and variances were approved for this project on May 23, 2001. Landmark designation was approved by City Council on May 14, 2001. The project may affect the half of the shed that sits on 105 E. Hallam Street, so that property is included in the review. APPLICANT: Jim and Patricia Gorman, represented by Mary Holley. PARCEL ID: 2735-124-37-001. ADDRESS: 101 E. Hallam Street, Lot A and the west 4.86 feet of Lot B, Block 65, City and Townsite ofAspen, Colorado. ZONING: R-6 (Medium Density Residential) SIGNIFICANT DEVELOPMENT (FINAL) No approval for any development in the "H," Historic Overlay District, or involving historic landmarks shall be granted unless the Historic Preservation Commission finds that all ofthe following standards (Section 26.415.010.C.5) are met: a. The proposed development is compatible in general design, scale, site plan, massing and volume with designated historic structures located on the parcel and with development on adjacent parcels when the subject site is in an "H," Historic Overlay District, or is adjacent to an historic landmark. For historic landmarks where proposed development would extend into front yard, side yard and rear yard setbacks, extend into the minimum distance between buildings on the lot, exceed the allowed floor area by up to five hundred (500) square feet, or exceed the allowed site covered by up to five (5) percent, HPC may grant necessary variances after making a finding that such variation is P19 more compatible in character with the historic landmark and the neighborhood than would be development in accord with dimensional requirements. In no event shall variations pursuant to this Section exceed those variations allowed under Section 26.520.040(B)(2), for detached accessory dwelling units, and Staff Finding: In May, HPC granted conceptual approval for some modest changes proposed at the back, non-historic portion of the existing house. The attached final drawings now show additional changes in this area, which include extending the upper floor living space a few more feet towards the alley and reconfiguring some windows on the east side of the addition. These changes do not directly affect the historic resource and staffhas no concerns with them. HPC has also approved the concept of demolishing and replacing the applicant's half of the shed that is located on the alley. There were numerous questions at the conceptual hearing about how certain code issues would be addressed and what the impact on the eastern half of the building, which is on 105 E. Hallam, Donald Krumm's property, would be. The architect has addressed the code issues with the shed by confirming with the Building Department what construction methods and materials will be required. The HPC will need to approve all material selections. To address some aesthetic issues, a "slot" has been created where the new shed construction will meet the existing. The Gorman's proposed new shed is also 3 feet longer than was previously shown. In the notice for this hearing, staff included variances that must be granted if the half of the shed on Don Krumm's property becomes unstable or must be demolished and reconstructed as part of this project. HPC did acknowledge that possibility in the motion made on May 23 and stated that a decision would have to be made on that issue if a problem comes up once construction begins. Don Krumm has stated to staff that he does not wish to see his building rebuilt if there is any way that can be avoided. The HPC may want to grant the variances at this time to accommodate the possibility that the whole shed will need to be dealt with. b. The proposed development reflects and is consistent with the character of the neighborhood of the parcel proposed for development, and Staff Finding: The proposal is consistent with other efforts to restore and expand historic homes throughout the neighborhood. c. The proposed development enhances or does not detract from the historic significance of designated historic structures located on the parcel proposed for development or on adjacent parcels, and P20 Staff Finding: The project protects the historic significance of the home in that there is no large or out of scale additions proposed. The determination in May was that the shed no longer maintains enough integrity to have historic significance. d. The proposed development enhances or does not diminish or detract from the architectural character and integrity of a designated historic structure or part thereof. Staff Finding: The project does not detract from the architectural character and integrity of the house. As noted in earlier discussions, the owners chose not to act on a much more damaging renovation proposal that was previously approved. Much of the new square footage will be below grade. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends HPC grant approval for final development and variances with the following conditions: 1. The HPC has granted the following variances: a.5 foot west side yard variance for the existing house, a 5 foot east side yard variance to build in the location of the existing shed, a 3.5 foot west sideyard variance for new construction (the linking element), a 5.5 foot combined sideyard setback variance, a 9.4 foot combined front and rear yard setback variance, a 5 foot rear yard setback variance, and waiver of one parking space. 2. The HPC hereby grants the following variances for the shed on 105 E. Hallam Street, in the event that the board agrees that it must be. reconstructed due to conditions that cannot be forseen at this time: a rear yard setback variance of 5 feet and a west sideyard setback variance of 5 feet to allow it to be rebuilt in its current location. 3. Information on all venting locations and meter locations shall be provided for review and approval by staff and monitor when the information is available. 4. Submit a demolition plan, as part of the building permit plan set, indicating exactly what areas of the shed are to be removed. 5. No elements are to be added to the historic house that did not previously exist. No existing exterior materials other than what has been specifically approved herein may be removed without the approval of staff and monitor. 6. HPC staff and monitor must approve the. type and location of all exterior lighting fixtures. 7. There shall be no deviations from the exterior elevations as approved without first being reviewed and approved by HPC staff and monitor. 8. The applicant shall be required to provide the contractor with copies of the HPC resolution applicable to this project. The contractor must submit a letter addressed to HPC staff as part ofthe building permit application indicating that all P21 conditions of approval are known and understood and must meet with the Historic Preservation Officer prior to applying for the building permit. 0 9. The General Contractor and/or Superintendent shall be required to obtain a specialty license in historic preservation prior to receiving a building permit. RECOMMENDED MOTION "I move to approve Resolution # , Series of 2001." Exhibits: A. Staff memo dated October 10, 2001 B. Minutes of May 23, 2001 C. Application 0 0 P22 0 RESOLUTION OF THE ASPEN HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION APPROVING AN APPLICATION FOR FINAL DEVELOPMENT AND VARIANCES FOR THE PROPERTY LOCATED AT 101 E. HALLAM STREET, LOT A AND THE WEST 4.86 FEET OF LOT B, AND 105 E. HALLAM STREET, THE EAST 25.14 FEET OF LOT B AND THE WEST 8 FEET OF LOT C, BLOCK 65, CITY AND TOWNSITE OF ASPEN, COLORADO PARCEL ID#2735-124-37-001& 2735-124-37-002 RESOLUTION NO. ~~SERIES OF 2001 WHEREAS, the applicants, Jim and Patricia Gorman, represented by Mary Holley, have requested Final Development approtal and Variances for the property located at 101 E. Hallam Street, Lot A and the west 4.86 feet of Lot B, and 105 E. Hallam Street, the east 25.14 feet of Lot B and the west 8 feet of Lot C, Block 65, City and Townsite of Aspen. The properties have both been listed on the "Inventory of Historic Sites and Structures"; and WHEREAS, all development in an "H," Historic Overlay District or development involving a historic landmark must meet all four Development Review Standards of Section 26.72.010(D) of the Aspen Land Use Code in order for HPC to grant approval, namely: 0 1. Standard: The proposed development is compatible in general design, massing and volume, scale and site plan with designated historic structures located on the parcel and with development on adjacent parcels when the subject site is in a"H," Historic Overlay District or is adjacent to an Historic Landmark. For historic landmarks where proposed development would extend into front yard, side yard and rear yard setbacks, extend into the minimum distance between buildings on the lot, exceed the allowed floor area by up to five hundred (500) square feet, or exceed the allowed site covered by up to five (5) percent, HPC may grant necessary variances after making a finding that such variation is more compatible in character with the historic landmark and the neighborhood than would be development in accord with dimensional requirements. In no event shall variations pursuant to this Section exceed those variations allowed under Section 26.520.040(B)(2), for detached accessory dwelling units, and 2. Standard: The proposed development reflects and is consistent with the character of the neighborhood of the parcel proposed for development. 3. Standard: The proposed development enhances or does not detract from the historic significance of designated historic structures located on the parcel proposed for development or on adjacent parcels. 0 P23 4. Standard: The proposed development enhances or does not diminish from the architectural character or integrity of a designated historic structure or part thereof; and WHEREAS, Amy Guthrie, in her staff report dated October 10, 2001, performed an analysis of the application based on the standards, and recommended approval of the project; and WHEREAS, at their regular meeting on October 10, 2001, the Historic Preservation Commission considered the application, found the application to meet the standards and to be consistent with the "City of Aspen Historic Preservation Design Guidelines" and approved the application by a vote of_ to _. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED: That Final Development and Variances for the property located at 101 E. Hallam Street, Lot A and the west 4.86 feet of Lot B, Block 65, City and Townsite of Aspen and 105 E. Hallam Street, the east 25.14 feet ofLot B and the west 8 feet ofLot C, Block 65, City and Townsite ofAspen. be approved with the following conditions: 1. The HPC has granted the following variances: a.5 foot west side yard variance for the existing house, a 5 foot east side yard variance to build in the location of the existing shed, a 3.5 foot west sideyard variance for new construction (the linking element), a 5.5 foot combined sideyard setback variance, a 9.4 foot combined front and rear yard setback variance, a 5 foot rear yard setback variance, and waiver of one parking space. 2. The HPC hereby grants the following variances for the shed on 105 E. Hallam Street, in the event that the board agrees that it must be reconstructed due to conditions that cannot be forseen at this time: a rear yard setback variance of 5 feet and a west sideyard setback variance of 5 feet to allow it to be rebuilt in its current location. 3. Information on all venting locations and meter locations shall be provided for review and approval by staff and monitor when the information is available. 4. Submit a demolition plan, as part of the building permit plan set, indicating exactly what areas ofthe shed are to be removed. 5. No elements are to be added to the historic house that did not previously exist. No existing exterior materials other than what has been specifically approved herein may be removed without the approval of staffand monitor. 6. HPC staff and monitor must approve the type and location of all exterior lighting fixtures. 7. There shall be no deviations from the exterior elevations as approved without first being reviewed and approved by HPC staff and monitor. 8. The applicant shall be required to provide the contractor with copies of the HPC resolution applicable to this project. The contractor must submit a letter addressed to HPC staff as part of the building permit application indicating that all P24 0 conditions of approval are known and understood and must meet with the Historic Preservation Officer prior to applying for the building permit. 9. The General Contractor and/or Superintendent shall be required to obtain a specialty license in historic preservation prior to receiving a building permit. APPROVED BY THE COMMISSION at its regular meeting on the 10th day of October, 2001. Approved as to Form: David Hoefer, Assistant City Attorney Approved as to content: 0 HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION Suzannah Reid, Chair ATTEST: Kathy Strickland, Chief Deputy Clerk 0 P25 shall consider the provision of affordable housing in relation to each development application by assigning points according to the system in this section (no minimum threshold ; maximum score three 0 (3) points; multiplier oftwo (2)): 1. Conversion of Existing Free Market Housing. Any applicant who commits to convert existing free market housing located within the Aspen Area Urban Growth Boundary to deed restricted sale housing pursuant to section 3-130-020 shall be awarded three (3) points. Any applicant who commits to convert existing free market housing located within the Rural Area to deed restricted sale housing pursuant to section 3-130-020 shall be awarded two (2) points. 2. Construction of Affordable Housing. Any applicant who commits to construct sale affordable housing on site for on-site employees pursuant to section 3-130-020 shall be awarded two (2) points. Any applicant who constructs sale affordable housing shall be awarded one (1) point. 3. Dedication of Land. Any applicant who commits to dedicate land within the Aspen Area Urban Growth Boundary pursuant to section 3-130-020 shall be awarded one (1) point. Maximum Score 3 Score: x2= COMMENT: BONUS POINTS Subtotal .. TOTAL POINTS (with multiplier): Minimum Subtotal Threshold (with multipliers) A. Availability and Appropiateness of Public and Private Facilities and 5 Services. B. Effect Upon the Environment and Resource Conservation. 5 C. Wildlife and Wildlife Habitat Protection 4 D. Consistency with Land Use Goals 5 E. Bonus Points (Maximum 12) N/A TOTAL Must meet minimum threshold in each category and obtain a total score of 48 points (with multipliers) to obtain an allotment 0 10 P26 ASPEN HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION MINUTES OF, MAY 23, 2001 0 101 E. HALLALM - CONCEPTUAL Amy said the owner has scaled back the alternation and one door on the historic portion of the building is being replaced. A non-historic addition is being expanded slightly. The heart of the matter is the shed on the alley. The previous approved allowed it to be demolished and reconstructed as a slightly taller building but the previous approval expired. This board had indicated concerns for demolishing the structure. The applicants have talked to Bill Bailey and feel there is no way to retain the structure or use it in any way for an effective garage. The board had suggested that they have a problem with that and staff has discussed this at length and feels the building has lost its integrity due to the addition of stucco to the outside of the building which cannot be removed without destroying the structure. The structure is in poor condition. Staff feels what is important is the character of the alley and the- shadow on the alley and that is what is being proposed. Staff recommends approval and there are variances requested in order to maintain the placement of the shed. The board needs to discuss whether it is 0 a good idea to salvage the materials from the existing building and apply them to the new structure as that implies that it is old and possibly it should be acknowledged that it is a new building and treat it that way. Chief Deputy City Clerk, Kathy Strickland swore in Mary Holley, Jim Gorman, Lisa Purdy. Mary said the majority of space is being put below grade even though that is not the desirable space but everyone felt that it was the best thing to do to retain the character of the existing brick house. The wall would be flush with the new addition and there is a change in plane between the brick and new shingles. This is a non-conforming lot and is 35 feet wide which is also the reason why we have the variances requested. The existing building does not conform to the city code and the setbacks are not where they need to be. There is no on-site parking currently. Basically what they have done is taken and connected between the existing house and shed currently sits. They did not want to increase the height of the shed as it would be out of character for an out building in the alley and also the neighbor was against that. The shed 0 4 P27 ASPEN HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION MINUTES OF, MAY 23, 2001 is half on Don Crum's property. They have brought the new part out at the same height as the existing flat roof and dropped the connection. 0 Rally asked if the proposal is to take down the entire shed and rebuild this or are you just doing half? Mary said the idea is to make the best effort to keep Don Crum's half ofthe shed as it is, take down and rebuild the halfthat is on Jim Gorman's property. The problem with that is that we have not gotten into the construction ofthat. If we are able to save half ofthe shed that is what we want to do. If a problem arises during construction we do not want to be held stringently to the fact that we have to save that half ofthe shed. It is split right now with a 2x4. The shed was stucco over brick then siding over the stucco. Framing on the roof is needed. The issue is what is the shed sitting on. If it is rubble then the shed will shift and bend. If it is on stone that goes down a couple of feet then there is a chance that we could keep the half of the shed that was better maintained. Lisa said by renovating half you could potentially risk the other half. Mary Holley said yes but Mr. Gorman is experienced in working with brick buildings and feels he can do it. Suzannah asked Amy if she would want to see the reconstruction with the 0 historic materials to include the detailing, if in fact the shed does get reconstructed. Amy replied yes because there is a certain character that we are trying to maintain and the idea of using old materials on top of the new material was a concern. Gilbert asked where the old materials would come from. Mary Holley said they are digging out and possibly could use some of the old brick depending on the condition of it. Chairperson Suzannah Reid opened and closed the public hearing. COMMENTS Jeffrey said this is a modest proposal and preservation ofthe north elevation and west elevation which are the most prominent is commendable. He is undecided about the resolution of the shed. 0 5 P28 ASPEN HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION MINUTES OF, MAY 23, 2001 0 Gilbert said overall the proposal is fine. The issue is do we encourage rebuilding a new structure that straddles the property line. What does the current code require in terms of a fire wall or exterior expression of that fire wall. He is not sure about the shed issue without that information. If you maintain the other half and rebuilt on this property there needs to be a relationship between the old and new and the drawing presented could be approved. Susan felt that the shed should be kept and she is in favor of keeping all sheds in the alleys. Sheds contribute to the "flavor" of our alleys. The preservation plan for the historic house is great. They are part of the old history of Aspen. Lisa said she does not favor demolition of the shed. It is probably the only brick shed in the west end and it adds to the alley scape and the west end. She would not support demolishing half ofthe shed. Rally said he has issues about the shed and what kind of party wall would be constructed. The other issue is that the garage is attached to the building and there was no garage before. When he looks at the west elevation it seems to 0 be a continuing house. He is not sure about the connecting garage. Suzannah is pleased about the direction taken with this project. The one story addition on the back is well thought out. She shares the concerns ofthe board about the "gray area" of the shed. She could agree with staff that the shed has been seriously compromised in terms of the integrity. Stucco does make it irretrievable and she could support the reconstruction of the shed. The important thing whether or not the other half of the shed is able to be preserved or needs to be reconstructed is that she would like to see consistency of the detailing that exists there now because that gives it the small scale and a shed character. She could support the demolition of the shed with the hope that the other half could be preserved but if not a reconstruction that would maintain some of the character of the existing structure on the alley. MOTION: Gilbert moved to approve Resolution 23, 2001with the following conditions: 1. The salvage brick will not be used on the new garage and 0 documenting existing detailing needs to occur during construction. 6 P29 ASPEN HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION MINUTES OF, MAY 23, 2001 2. The HPC hereby approves thefollowing variances: a .5 foot west side yard variance for the existing house, a 5 foot east side yard variance to build in the location of the existing shed, a 3.5 foot west sideyard variancefor new construction (the linking element), a 5.5 foot combined sideyard setback variance, a 9.4 foot combinedfront and rear yard setback variance, a 5 foot rear yard setback variance, and waiver of one parking space. 3. The partial demolition approval also applies to the half of the shed that sits on the 105 E. Hallam Street property will be reviewed by the board when additional evidence that is uncovered during the construction phase is provided. 4. That the applicant shall also present for board approval any exterior expression of the fire rated wall that will be required on the property line. Jim Gorman stated that the adjacent property owner and himself prefer that we keep the shed and stabilize it. Amy said the drawings in the packet show a completely reconstructed shed but Gilbert's motion is saying he is not approving rebuilding Don's half until they come back and tell us that there is no way to save it. Gilbert said yes. Amy said even if they can save it they need to come back because it is not going to look like the picture if they are trying to hang onto it. Gilbert said that is correct. So you are basically approving the demolition of the 1/6 on the Gorman's property and withholding judgment on the other half until we know more. Gilbert has agreed that 101 part of the shed can be demolished at this point. The 105 half and how the pieces will join etc., the UBC issues need to be submitted. Motion second by Rally. Motion carried 4-2. Yes vote: Jeffrey, Gilbert, Suzannah,Rally No vote: Susan, Lisa 7 Â· P30 I, NVV-'â€¢ Marg A. Arjian Architects, F.C. MEMORANDUM To: Amy Guthrie, Historic Preservation Officer From: Mary Holley CC: Jim Gorman Date: August 8, 2001 Re: Final Review of 101 E. Hallam Addition and Remodel We are applying for Final review of Significant Development, Partial Demolition, rear and side yard setback variances, and a parking variance for an addition and remodel to the existing residence at 101 East Hallam. A few minor changes have been made to the project in response to comments made by the Historic Preservation Commission on our meeting on May 23 and meetings with the owners. Also, there were some concerns regarding the necessity of having a parapet between the Gorman's garage and Don Krumm's remaining shed. I have researched the fire rating issue and will address it below: â€¢ Parapet at Shed I spoke with Denis Murray of the Building Department and discussed our particular situation. Due to its location on the property line, the wall between the Gorman's garage and Don Krumm's shed will be considered an exterior wall and will be required to be one hour rated. Under normal circumstances, a parapet will be required in that instance, however, Section 709.4.1 of the 1997 version of the Uniform Building Code allows for exceptions to having a parapet I have enclosed the relevant code section with the exceptions for your review. To summarize, a parapet will not be required if the roof and wall framing within five feet of the "exterior" wall is of one hour construction, there are no roof openings within five feet of the wall, and if the entire building is provided with a Class B roof covering. In order to accommodate a Class B roof covering, the entire building, including Don Krumm's half of the shed, will need to be reroofed with the appropriate type of roof covering and substrate. â€¢ Design revisions since Conceptual Review The width of the garage was questioned during the Conceptual Review meeting. After further review with Jim Gorman, we determined that it would be preferable to have a garage that was a little wider. To accomplish this, the rebuilt part of the shed has been lengthened by about three feet. This has changed the western and southern elevations slightly. 1 50 River Oaks Lane basalt, Colorado 8162.1 rhone: (970) 917-7656 Vax:(970)917-7669 E-mail: aardvark@sopris.net I Web Vage: http//mt.sopns.net/aardvark P31 wâ€¢n- Mars A. Arlian Architects, V.C. MEMORANDUM One of my concerns is how to differentiate the existing shed from the rebuilt part of the shed. Obviously the new bricks will not match the existing historic brick and any attempt to make them match would be fruitless. To express the difference between the two parts of the shed while preserving the single roof over the entire building, I have incorporated a "slot" between the two which allows the old and the new to coexist without compromising the integrity of either. â€¢ Additional design changes Upon further review of the plans, the Gormans decided that they would like to move the Master Bath to the current Sitting Room area on the Upper level. The existing space is a bit too small to house the bathroom, so we have extended that area so that it now even with the edge of the existing main level. This results in the smaller gable on the southern elevation being approximately four feet longer than it currently is. The southern elevation on the Upper Level is now slightly different, with a door where a window used to be and a window where the double doors to the deck are currently located. The window pattern on the existing part of the Eastern elevation has also been changed. We have eliminated the horizontal fixed glass windows and have replaced them with new vertically oriented double hung windows which are more in keeping with the spirit of the architecture. The remainder of the project is essentially the same. We still intend to keep Don Krumm's half of the shed, but as represented to the H.P.C. earlier, we will know more about the condition of the existing foundation once construction actually begins. The entire approach to this project has been directed toward presenring the original brick house with as little disturbance as possible. The concept of putting the addition under the terrace and the newer addition was meant to help further this preservation. I feel that the current iteration has stayed true to the original approach and that the resolution of the southern shed elevation has had a positive impact on the project. 2 5 0 River Oa Ics Lane basalt, Colorado 8 1 6 1 1 Thone: (970) 917-7656 Vax: (970) 917-7669 E--mail: aardvarl<@sopris.net I Wei, Fage: http//mt.sopris-net/aardvarl< P32 Of msm,15â€¢maÂ¥â€¢10â€¢ =immj MEETING DATE: ~0 ~ to ~6 1 NAME OF PROJECT: dO/61-106Â©A-yrlÂ« PSE- A-4 L.th)'7-1 CLERK: t~CL~- LJ STAFF: -~771'~1 6 44-T~Mitit E- WITNESSES: (1) Al,-Api< -+-6 61.-ey (2) (3) (4) (5) EXHIBITS: 1 Staff Report ( 4' (Check If Applicable) 2 Affidavit of Notice C Y (Check If Applicable) 3 Board Criteria Sheet (~ ) (Check If Applicable) ~913'0 ~-8 4 #PLA/ttt~- 09-aul,1.t-QÂ«J / A#Il-- af-, 3 1(3)-420 MOTION A-c~t~/El yu-lat) 14 4:S-~ 1/cÂ»tit 0-Â·tkctit 4*15 Ftc 4 2-h + sluvvi n 3 2 U.Â©21,Â«24 /,U-cÂ»*41,4-00-4 9-U OflÂ»\,f.~44 fÂ©.1 1.1-,1 711uijiti,"12-4 -123(301*29 9 4-it.6~LAJ CIA 0 t>, C-,J 7~9 to i jk_ 4(60 * 09 u,urÂ·au.GL- VOTE: ' -Â¥ES lit 4.4/0 ' 37-0 1 I. U SUZANNAH REID YES -Ne--- ..r - NEILL HIRST YES 40 - , GILBERT SANCHEZ YES 15 NO LISA MARKALUNAS YES No b/~ JEFFREY HALFERTY YES u<o _ RALLY DUPPS YES NO ~/ drERENXMES'ILLE YES-ZrNU -n YES NO YES NO --- Â»11 Le-CLO k httÂ·Uy--u r &.j Calf AL Zid Â«i-W HPCVOTE Attachment 8 County of Pitkin } AFFIDAVIT OF NOTICE PURSUANT } SS. TO ASPEN LAND USE REGULATIONS State of Colorado } SECTION 26.304.060(E) I, MHAY ##961 , being or representing an Applicant to the City ofAspen, personally certify that I have complied with the public notice requirements pursuant to Section 26.304.060(E) of the Aspen Municipal Code in the following manner: 1. By mailing ofnotice, a copy ofwhich is attached hereto, by first-class postage prepaid U.S. Mail to aIl owners ofproperty within three hundred (300) feet ofthe subject property, as indicated ~ on the attached list, on the 14*day of '*FIEMPig,~T~ . (which is 90 days prior to the public hearing date of OCTÂ· 10, *601 ). 2. By posting a sign in a conspicuous place on the subject property (as it could be seen from the nearest public way) and that the said sign was posted and visible continuously from the 1#'Klay 4.0 1 *01 of ~ , to the lÂ¢Pday of ay!,MF- , 199 Â·. (Must be posted for at least ten (10) full days before the hearing date). A photograph ofthe posted sign is attached hereto. (Attach photograph here) Signed before me this P'day of D dt loor, le_. by Â»4- u xu~ JODI WITNESS MY HAND AND OFFICIAL SEAL My Commission expires: A - 45 - 2 005- Notary Public i Maureen 1 Hpcl 101 iDIOt PUBLIC NOTICE RE: 101 E. IIALLAM STREET- FINAL DESIGN REVIEW NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that a public hearing will be held on Wednesday, October 10, 2001 at a meeting to begin at 5:00 p.m. before the Aspen Historic Preservation Commission, Council Chambers, City Hall, 130 S. Galena St., Aspen, to consider an application submitted by Jim and Patricia Gorman requesting final design review for an addition to a historic house. The property is located at 101 E. Hallam Street, Lot A and the westerly 4.86 feet ofLot B, Block 65, City and Townsite ofAspen. This project affects a shed that sits partially on the Gorman property and partially on the property immediately to the east, 105 E. Hallam Street, the east 25.14 feet of Lot B and the west 8 feet ofLot C, Block 65, City and Townsite of Aspen, owned by Donald Krumm. The Gorman's have received approval and setback variances to reconstruct their half of the shed. It may be necessary to take the same action with the halfwhich sits on the Krumm property, in which case the HPC will be asked to grant a rear yard setback variance of 5 feet and a west sideyard setback variance of 5 feet to allow it to be rebuilt in its current location. For further information, contact Amy Guthrie at the Aspen/Pitkin County Community Development Department, 130 S. Galena St., Aspen, CO (970) 920-5096, amyg@ci.aspen.co.us. s/Suzannah Reid. Chair Aspen Historic Preservation Commission Published in the Aspen Times on September 22, 2001 City ofAspen Account MAR. 27.2001 3:00PM BILL POSS ASSOCIATES NO. 066 P. 1 /120 EAST MAIN PARTNERS LLC ~*SPEN HOTEL ASSOCIATES LLC ,*ASPEN HOTEL ASSOCIATES LLC C/O VETRA BNK-COMM LENDER :' 120 E MAIN ST 250 MARTIN ST STE 100 534 E HYMAN BIRMINGHAM, MI 48009-3383 ASPEN, CO 81611 ASPEN, CO 81611 /BROCKWAY LEXIE AfrY Op ASPEN ~ , CITY OF ASPEN , 7714 FISHER ISLAND DR / 130 S GALENA ST 130 S GALENA ST FISHER ISLAND. FL 33109-0966 ASPEN, CO 81611 ASPEN, CO 81611 1 . .... 1 ERWIN GREGORY D ,PAIEDLAND HEIDI , ,FRINK ALBERT A TRUST 11248 JOHN GALT BLVD / 124 N GARMISCH ST 9 OCEANCREST OMAHA NE 68137 ASPEN, CO 81611 NEWPORT COAST, CA 92657-1802 ... . . . .... ..0- .... 01~EN INSTITUTE %/ GARCIA SCOTT D <GORMAN JAMES & PATRICIA Â»EGENTS OF UNIVERSITY Of..' 120 N GARMISCH 1426 ROSE GLEN RD ASPEN, CO 81611 1 COLORADO 4 GLADWYNE, PA 1 9035 BOULDER, CO 80304 0 .- . ~GROSSE ADELINE M REVOCABLE Â» FAMILY INVESTMENT LTD ~SW FAMILY INVESTMENT LTD LIVING TRUST / PARTNERSHIP ' PARTNERSHIP GROSEE EDWIN J & ADELINE M 1300 CHAPLINE ST * RD #1 BOX 110 TRUSTESS , WHEELING, WV 28003 WHEEUNG, WV 28003 100 E BLEEKER ST ASPEN, CO 81611 / HENRY FREDERICK B H-GUET CONSTANCE M /6HNSON RICHARD & MONTAE IMBT '9 HALLAM ST ;/533 E 68TH ST 6820 BRADBURY N, CO 81611 NEW YORK, NY 10021 j DALLAS, TX 75230 - e. . .... -- 9 0- I----- 'OOHNSON-HAUGLAND HELENE L 10(LIMM DONALD PAUL AEW ROBERT & MONICA 105 E BLEEKER #B ,+0 BOX 874 , 11414 N BAYSHORE DR ASPEN, CO 81611 / ASPEN, CO 81612 NORTH MIAMI, FL 33181 ~NOLAN ELAINE L >FÂ¢6RTH & SOUTH ASPEN LLC ~/*ARDUBA JIRI 148 GLENRIDGE PIONY ' 200 S ASPEN ST : PO BOX 9903 EL DORADO. AR 71730 ASPEN, CO 81611 ASPEN. CO 81612 ,#ENN PAUL E ~SADLER PRISCILLA ANNE TRUSTEE PENINSULA LLC / PENN SUSAN W ' / FOR HCR 64 B 200 9505 COPLEY DR Â· SADLER PRISCILLA A REVOC TRUST BROOKLIN, ME 04616 INDIANAPOLIS, IN 46260 PO BOX 2989 ASPEN, CO 81612 v/SEMRAU TIM ~MOTTON JENNY W BUTTON KERMIT S & JENNY W 128 N GARMISCH 4101 CUTLASS IN /801 12TH AVE S STE 400 ASPEN, CO 81611 NAPLES, FL 34102 NAPLES, FL 33840 ::1 .. Â£001 3:01 PM BILL FOSS ASSOCIATES NO. 066 PÂ· 2 US WEST COMMUNICATIONS.TL393 J WATSON DIANE B , ZATS JULIE 6300 S SYRACUSE WAY STE 700 N 121 W BLEEKER ST 118 N GARMISCH ENGLEWOOD, CO 80111 ASPEN, CO 81611 ASPEN, CO 81611 .... .. . -..il.-1 : , S . ...... . ... .... â€ž.-0 ..... .- ....=--- .... . 1 .... D .... --I --/ .1 --- *-.... + -, ... t - 44 . & . 64 4,4 h , 21 1 , 4..,t ' 1 4 , I J. Aa'f I V f + f n 4. Â¥6, 9 0 , 9 2 . ' -u=9441.2 + -fNrÂ· *A '1 ..41; 0 *f..11:ri .9<,24 w-4, 4*5- -- .1 86, . 1 r- P , - 0,--r k ...â€¢ . , 4 â‚¬1 + an .râ€¢ M i 1 '4 -- -- - 1, 1 t ill i. e + 8 r AM./.rwilt. tL /6 *.2 +4~~1\ 19 \ ** i - w -1 - , 4- 9/ 1, ... 4. , 4 - *-I . 'AL.r V % , /4/ . . I. 44,47Â¢/~.,1 . 111, 4% 11" ,, 9 *I 4 . . .: V Tri, ., I I - - i 04. I .. 2 -2.. /22: 1'* A,4,;~#;/42322â€¢*4â€¢8â€¢ksÂ«*:S:/ 2 >~.~f~MAÂ»~t*'*p-â„¢,Â«~ * . 4-5 ..l, V r> I 111 :Im i I 7,- rt ' /4.1.1 i . 4 ./.# 0*t . 1 4 â€ž41.4 'f, 1 , 1 t . *k_/6 4 2. LÂ¥ -1-Â¥,'-* t rl F.,-#. -27 Â·.1/4/1..- - t Vil 1 - f .,-~~ â€¢64/,1.22 . t - LAM . 1 14*T, , 11 4- 1 . 6.4 . 111 . I -4,4X ,# .1 44% , ikilililleMfi#L / IF ' . Ir- I. 11. a '4 . Nt,fl . 3 3 3 h 1 3 ftt P % ~ PUBLIC NOTICE ~ DATE: OCTOBER 10,2001 TIME: 5:00 p.m. 1 PLACE: COUNCIL ~ CHAMBERS, CITY HALL, ~ 130 S. GALINA ST. ~ J PURPOSE: Final design , , 1 review for an addition and Â£ . re model. 2- . .i " EÂ»%,4 ) i ...â‚¬..........~....--- 5. 1- . 9. 49 . fÂ». 9 * 1 A 1 1 4 011,~ 111*7/91-L A r. . V- /f i. i ...~ . 1 47~ b.. MEMORANDUM TO: Aspen Historic Preservation Commission FROM: Amy Guthrie, Historic Preservation Officer RE: 205 S. Third Street- Final Review, PUBLIC HEARING DATE: October 10, 2001 SUMMARY: This property contains a house historically known as the "Matthew Callahan Log Cabin." It is a local landmark and is listed on the National Register of Historic Places. On September 12th, HPC granted Conceptual approval for a small addition to the existing residence. APPLICANT: Walter and Kitty Sherwin, represented by Mark Conklin and Steve Danuff. LOCATION: 205 S. Third Street, the east M of Lot G, Lot H, and Lot I, Block 39, City and Townsite of Aspen. PARCEL ID: 2735-124-65-003. DEVELOPMENT REVIEW STANDARDS All development in an "H," Historic Overlay District or development involving a historic landmark must meet all four of the following Development Review Standards, from Section 26.72.010(D) of the Aspen Land Use Code in order for HPC to grant approval. 1. Standard: The proposed development is compatible in general design, massing and volume, scale and site plan with designated historic structures located on the parcel and with development on adjacent parcels when the subject site is in a "H," Historic Overlay District or is adjacent to an Historic Landmark. For historic landmarks where proposed development would extend into front yard, side yard and rear yard setbacks, extend into the minimum distance between buildings on the lot, exceed the allowed floor area by up to five hundred (500) square feet, or exceed the allowed site covered by up to five (5) percent, HPC may grant necessary variances after maldng a finding that such variation is more compatible in character with the historic landmark and the neighborhood than would be development in accord with dimensional requirements. In no event shall variations pursuant to this Section 0 1 P33 exceed those variations allowed under Section 26.520.040(B)(2), for detached accessory dwelling units. Staff Response: The National Register form states that this is the oldest existing hand hewn log structure left in Aspen and dates its construction at 1885 or earlier. There are two small wood frame additions that have been made to the original house on the west and south sides. The applicant proposes to build at the southwest corner of the cabin, adjoining earlier additions to the log building. No dates are available for when those additions were made. This block is not included on the Sanborne map. The home is currently about 1,000 square feet in size and the owner wishes to expand by 312 square feet. This is a very modestly sized project and the owner's effort to preserve the scale and character ofthis important historic building is very commendable. The design has been modified slightly since conceptual review to respond to the concerns expressed by Staffand the HPC. The conditions made on Sept. 12th were as follows: 1. Eliminate the angled wall on the northwest corner of the new addition and delete one ofthe two dormers that were shown. 2. Maintain a 1 foot reveal of the existing building walls where the old and new construction meet. 3. Use a thicker batt than what was used on the earlier additions to the house, or use a reverse batt. Bring a sample for review. The roofing and siding should be somewhat different than what is found on the rest of the building. 4. All of the windows on the addition should be double hung, which is the style appropriate to the period ofthe historic house. 5. All of the lightwells should have metal grates over them, as opposed to railings that are visible above grade. 6. The staircase should be redesigned to be a much smaller element than what is proposed. It should probably run along the west side of the new construction, tucked close to the building. Study snowshed concerns. 7. Any skylights on the addition or other features proposed must be clearly shown on the plans. 8. Accurately show all proposed lightwells in plan view. 9. The cricket that is needed where snow is piling up and causing leaks needs further discussion. Staff finds that these issues have been addressed, with the exception of approving material samples and the roof cricket. Staff also has a few more issues to bring up. First, the applicant must be aware that the below grade space that is being created may not be occupied as a separate living unit, meaning that it cannot have a bathroom and kitchen facilities. Second, the HPC should discuss whether it is appropriate to use clad windows on this addition and whether or not it is important to try to align the windows on the main level 2 P34 and those in the basement. Third, staff recommends that the entry dormer be cut down in size so that it protects the entry but is no larger than necessary. The entire addition is, as discussed on Sept. 12th, wide as compared to the original house and this relationship should not be exaggerated. The doors into the addition should reflect the style on the rest of the building, which may be a paneled door with a half-lite. Staff has concerns with the design of the roof cricket and recommends that a simpler element which does not go so far as to connect the ridgelines, must be detennined. 2. Standard: The proposed development reflects and is consistent with the character ofthe neighborhood ofthe parcel proposed for development. Staff Response: There are few historic buildings in this immediate vicinity. The property is special in the sense that it is a very early and unusual structure, and much about the overall setting of the log cabin is still in place. The small size and sensitive location of this addition will preserve that character. Staff finds that this standard is met. 3. Standard: The proposed development enhances or does not detract from the historic significance of designated historic structures located on the parcel proposed for development or on adjacent parcels. Staff Response: Because of the small size of the addition, staff finds that it does not diminish one's ability to perceive this building as a modest 19th century home. Stafffinds that this standard is met. 4. Standard: The proposed development enhances or does not diminish from the architectural character or integrity of a designated historic structure or part thereoÂ£ Staff Response: The project has been revised so that the architectural character and integrity of the house are preserved. RECOMMENDED MOTION "I move to grant Final approval for 205 S. Third Street the east M of Lot G, Lot H, and Lot I, Block 39, City and Townsite of Aspen, finding that the review standards and the design guidelines have been met, with the conditions stated in Resolution # , Series of 2001." Exhibits: Resolution # , Series of 2001 A. Staff memo dated October 10, 2001 B. Final drawings 3 P35 RESOLUTION OF THE ASPEN HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION APPROVING AN APPLICATION FOR FINAL DEVELOPMENT FOR THE 0 PROPERTY LOCATED AT 205 S. THIRD STREET, THE EAST M OF LOT G, LOT H, AND LOT I, BLOCK 39, CITY AND TOWNSITE OF ASPEN, COLORADO PARCEL ID#2735-124-65-003 RESOLUTION NO. - SERIES OF 2001 WHEREAS, the applicants, Walter and Kitty Sherwin, represented by Mark Conklin and Steve Danuff, have requested Final Development approval for the property located at 205 S. Third Street, the east M of Lot G, Lot H, and Lot I, Block 39, City and Townsite of Aspen. The property is listed on the "Inventory ofHistoric Sites and Structures"; and WHEREAS, all development in an "H," Historic Overlay District or development involving a historic landmark must meet all four Development Review Standards of Section 26.72.010(D) of the Aspen Land Use Code in order for HPC to grant approval, namely: 1. Standard: The proposed development is compatible in general design, massing and volume, scale and site plan with designated historic structures located on the parcel and with development on adjacent parcels when the subject site is in a "H," Historic Overlay District or is adjacent to an Historic Landmark. For historic 0 landmarks where proposed development would extend into front yard, side yard and rear yard setbacks, extend into the minimum distance between buildings on the lot, exceed the allowed floor area by up to five hundred (500) square feet, or exceed the allowed site covered by up to five (5) percent, HPC may grant necessary variances after making a finding that such variation is more compatible in character with the historic landmark and the neighborhood than would be development in accord with dimensional requirements. In no event shall variations pursuant to this Section exceed those variations allowed under Section 26.520.040(B)(2), for detached accessory dwelling units, and 2. Standard: The proposed development reflects and is consistent with the character ofthe neighborhood of the parcel proposed for development. 3. Standard: The proposed development enhances or does not detract from the historic significance of designated historic structures located on the parcel proposed for development or on adjacent parcels. 4. Standard: The proposed development enhances or does not diminish from the architectural character or integrity of a designated historic structure or part thereof; and P36 WHEREAS, Amy Guthrie, in her staff report dated October 10, 2001, performed an analysis of the application based on the standards, and recommended approval of the project with conditions; and WHEREAS, at their regular meeting on October 10, 2001, the Historic Preservation Commission considered the application, found the application to meet the standards and to be consistent with the "City of Aspen Historic Preservation Design Guidelines" and approved the application by a vote of_to_. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED: That Final Development for the property located at 205 S. Third Street, the east M of Lot G, Lot H, and Lot I, Block 39, City and Townsite of Aspen be approved with the following conditions: l. HPC must approve all exterior materia.~COV 2. The applicant may use clad windowwn the new addition. 3. Align the main floor and basement windows. 4. Reduce the size of the dormer to the minimum necessary to protect the entry. 5. Use exterior doors which are in keeping with the style of the doors found on the rest ofthe house (paneled with a half lite.) 6. Redesign the cricket to profile ofthe existing roofridgelines. APPROVED BY THE COMMISSION at its regular meeting on the 10th day of October, 2001. Approved as to Form: David Hoefer, Assistant City Attorney Approved as to content: HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION Suzannah Reid, Chair ATTEST: Kathy Strickland, Chief Deputy Clerk P37 MEMORANDUM TO: Aspen Historic Preservation Commission THRU: Joyce Ohlson, Deputy Planning Director FROM: Amy Guthrie, Historic Preservation Officer RE: Wagner Park, Public Facilities- Final, PUBLIC HEARING DATE: October 10, 2001 SUMMARY: The City proposes to demolish the existing public bathrooms on the east side of Wagner Park and replace them with new facilities. The HPC must review the proposal because it falls with the "Commercial Core Historic District." Staffrecommends final approval with no conditions. APPLICANT: City of Aspen Parks Department, represented by Willis Pember Architects. LOCATION: The east side of Wagner Park, City of Aspen. PARCEL ID: 2737-182-20-851 DEVELOPMENT REVIEW STANDARDS All development in an "H," Historic Overlay District or development involving a historic landmark must meet all four of the following Development Review Standards, from Section 26.72.010(D) ofthe Aspen Land Use Code in order for HPC to grant approval. 1. Standard: The proposed development is compatible in general design, massing and volume, scale and site plan with designated historic structures located on the parcel and with development on adjacent parcels when the subject site is in a "H," Historic Overlay District or is adjacent to an Historic Landmark. For historic landmarks where proposed development would extend into front yard, side yard and rear yard setbacks, extend into the minimum distance between buildings on the lot exceed the allowed floor area by up to five hundred (500) square feet, or exceed the allowed site covered by up to five (5) percent, HPC may grant necessary variances after making a finding that such variation is more compatible in character with the historic landmark and the neighborhood than would be development in accord with dimensional requirements. In no event shall variations pursuant to this Section exceed those variations allowed under Section 26.520.040(B)(2), for detached accessory dwelling units. 1 P13 Staff Response: The project replaces existing outdated public bathrooms, housed in a one story, non-descript structure. In addition to restrooms, other amenities will be provided, including a clock tower, a sports overlook tower for viewing and announcing events in the park, a telephone kiosk, and an interpretive exhibit which displays information about various periods ofAspen's history. The bathroom structure and the kiosk are one story in height. The sports overlook has a second story observation deck. The clock tower, at 30 feet, is the tallest of the new elements. All the construction is done in a material palette that has been selected to tell a story about Aspen, referencing its mining past and other local structures. The forms of the buildings are contemporary, as are the solar collector panels used as a roof on the bathrooms. The project has several goals, from providing much needed services for the public to creating a gateway into the park. The buildings create an atmosphere that will encourage people to gather. There is little in the way of historic structures in the immediate area, and the classic storefront features of the surrounding buildings do not provide any relevant guide for the project. The overall policy for new construction in the downtown historic district, as stated in the design guidelines is "Improvements in the Commercial Core Historic District should maintain the integrity of historic resources in the area. At the same time, compatible and creative design solutions should be encouraged." There is also substantial discussion about opportunities to enhance pedestrian character. Staff finds this project to be very successful. The usability of the park will be vastly improved and a new opportunity to describe what is unique about Aspen is offered. 2. Standard: The proposed development reflects and is consistent with the character ofthe neighborhood of the parcel proposed for development. Staff Response: The project lies near the western border of the historic district. The only historic structure on the adjacent block is the Red Onion, so the 19th century building context is weak in this general area. The architects have found some effective ways to tie the project into the downtown and strengthen the character of the neighborhood. - 3. Standard: The proposed development enhances or does not detract from the historic significance of designated historic structures located on the parcel proposed for development or on adjacent parcels. Staff Response: No historic structures are directly adjacent to this area, and none are affected by the project. 2 P14 4. Standard: The proposed development enhances or does not diminish from the architectural character or integrity of a designated historic structure or part thereoÂ£ Staff Response: No historic structures are directly adjacent to this area, and none are affected by the project. RECOMMENDATION: Staffrecommends that HPC approve Final Development for Wagner Park finding that the review standards and design guidelines are met, with no conditions. RECOMMENDED MOTION "I move to approve Resolution # , Series of 2001." Exhibits: A. Staffmemo dated October 10, 2001 B. Application 3 P15 RESOLUTION OF THE ASPEN HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION APPROVING AN APPLICATION FOR FINAL DEVELOPMENT FOR NEW PUBLIC FACILITIES AT WAGNER PARK, CITY AND TOWNSITE OF ASPEN, COLORADO PARCEL ID: 2737-182-20-851 RESOLUTION NO., SERIES OF 2001 WHEREAS, the applicant, the City of Aspen Parks Department, represented by Willis Pember Architects, has requested Finall Development approval for new public facilities along the east side of Wagner Park, within the City and Townsite of Aspen. The property is located in the "Commercial Core Historic District," and WHEREAS, all development in an "H," Historic Overlay District or development involving a historic landmark must meet all four Development Review Standards of Section 26.72.010(D) of the Aspen Land Use Code in order for HPC to grant approval, namely: 1. Standard: The proposed development is compatible in general design, massing and volume, scale and site plan with designated historic structures located on the parcel and with development on adjacent parcels when the subject site is in a "H," Historic Overlay District or is adjacent to an Historic Landmark. For historic landmarks where proposed development would extend into front yard, side yard and rear yard setbacks, extend into the minimum distance between buildings on the lot, exceed the allowed floor area by up to five hundred (500) square feet, or exceed the allowed site covered by up to five (5) percent, HPC may grant necessary variances after making a finding that such variation is more compatible in character with the historic. landmark and the neighborhood than would be development in accord with dimensional requirements. In no event shall variations pursuant to this Section exceed those variations allowed under Section 26.520.040(B)(2), for detached accessory dwelling units, and 2. Standard: The proposed development reflects and is consistent with the character ofthe neighborhood of the parcel proposed for development. 3. Standard: The proposed development enhances or does not detract from the historic significance of designated historic structures located on the parcel proposed for development or on adjacent parcels. 4. Standard: The proposed development enhances or does not diminish from the architectural character or integrity of a designated historic structure or part thereof; and P16 WHEREAS, Amy Guthrie, in her staff report dated October 10, 2001, performed an 0 analysis of the application based on the standards, and recommended approval of the project; and WHEREAS, at their regular meeting on October 10, 2001, the Historic Preservation Commission considered the application, found the application to meet the standards, and to be consistent with the "City of Aspen Historic Preservation Design Guidelines" and approved the application by a vote of to NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED: That Final Development approval is granted for the public facilities on the east side of Wagner Park, City and Townsite of Aspen, as presented on October 10,2001, with no conditions. APPROVED BY THE COMMISSION at its regular meeting on the 10th day of October, 2001. Approved as to Form: 0 David Hoefer, Assistant City Attorney Approved as to content: HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION Gilbert Sanchez, Vice Chair ATTEST: Kathy Strickland, Chief Deputy Clerk 0 P17 WILLIS PEMBER ARCHITECTS INC 412 NORTH MILL STREET ASPEN CO 81611 Ms. Amy Guthrie 9.9.01 Aspen Historic Preservation Commission City of Aspen Community Development Department Aspen, Colorado 81611 Re: Significant Development Review - Wagner Park Edge - Final Review Response to Attachment 5. 1. Major building materials are called out on the attached 1/4" and 1/2" =1'-0" scale drawings. Actual material samples will be presented at the review. Samples are currently in the office of the Architect. 2. Drawings are attached 3. N/A 4. Final review plans are nearly identical to the Conceptual review presentation. The result of the Conceptual review was approval without condition. Sincerely, LL. Willis Pember, AIA VC 970 920 1727 Â· NCARB Â· AIA Â· FX 970 920 4461 P18 13 10- U ~ISTORIÂ¢PRE;JB~*10N) 0101@MISSIL@@m 1 1 , 1 MEETING DATE: g ~ 0 ~0 l NAME OF PROJECT: h/Aa JEW Â¥2#98Â« . CLERK:7*0<3~-0Â°Â° STAFF: ~ 6-4 U . ,1 Al .1 , 0 ,} WITNESSES: (1) l.u) lt,U.,0 j--13916/UÂ»'L-/ m 74 k) OrA'Â£60 (3) (4) (5) EXHIBITS: 1 Staff Report ~/j' (Check If Applicable) 2 Affidavit of Notice (~(Check If Applicable) 3 Board Criteria Sheet ( ) (Check If Applicable) 16 OV ~:_ 4 54 MOTION: ( j A -8, 0 -P' 46,0/473,342%0064.- (Le.: 2 + VOTE: YES ~ NOO -=NO- -MELAN*10 ROSCIIKO YES - NO-- - NEILL HIRST YES 1< NO GILBERT SANCHEZ YES -~NO _ LISA MARKALUNAS YES -00 JEFFREY HALFERTY YES -1Â»0 - RALLY DUPPS YES V NO -YES --419==.== YES NO YES NO - -- ill- (fi C ~ : Â»i-4 *+1%4 jhk) 4 60- htÂ»L p. HPCVOTE PUBLIC NOTICE DATE TIME r 6,44 6_ PURPOSE '. '01Â», W- m. I ** I 1. 0.-Em,7,1 p /8 -/O it ~ AFFIDAVIT OF PUBLIC NOTICE REQUIRED BY SECTION 26.304.060 (E), ASPEN LAND USE CODE 9, A-G/.4 glu P A-*44.- ADDRESS OF PROPERTY: 451-1 E.-S T 6-"Pe-L , Aspen, CO SCHEDULED PUBLIC HEARING DATE: 6 (77 lo , 200_L STATE OF COLORADO ) ) SS. County of Pitkin ) I, 8, 66 1 4 7 0--Adr3 â‚¬12.- (name, please print) being or representing an Applicant to the City of Aspen, Colorado, hereby personally certify that I have complied with the public notice requirements of Section 26.304.060 (E) of the Aspen Land Use Code in the following manner: Publication of notice: By the publication in the legal notice section of an official paper or apaper of general circulation in the City ofAspen at least fifteen (15) days prior to the public hearing. A copy ofthepublication is attached hereto. 1 Posting ofnotice: By posting of notice, which form was obtained from the Community Development Department, which was made of suitable, waterproof materials, which was not less than twenty-two (22) inches wide and twenty-six (26) inches high, and which was composed of letters not less than one inch in height. Said notice was posted at least ten (10) days prior to the public hearing and was continuously visible from the 3 0 day of sEPT. , 200 / , to and including the date and time of the public headng. A photograph of the posted notice (sign) is attached hereto. Mailing of notice. By the mailing of a notice obtained from the Community Development Department, which contains the information described in Section 26.304.060(E)(2) of the Aspen Land Use Code. At least ten (10) days prior to the public hearing, notice was hand delivered or mailed by first class, postage prepaid U.S. mail to all owners ofproperty within three hundred (300) feet of the property subject to the development application, and, at least fifteen (15) days prior to the public hearing, notice was hand delivered or mailed by first class postage prepaid U.S. mail to any federal agency, state, county, municipal government, school, service district or other governmental or quasi-governmental agency that owns property within three hundred (300) feet ofthe property subject to the development application. The names and addresses ofproperty owners shall be those on the current tax records of Pitkin County as they appeared no more than sixty (60) days prior to the date ofthe public hearing. A copy ofthe owners and governmental agencies so noticed is attached hereto. (continued on next page) Rezoning or text amendment. Whenever the official zoning district map is in any way to be changed or amended incidental to or as part of a general revision of this Title, or whenever the text ofthis Title is to be amended, whether such revision be made by repeal of this Title and enactment of a new land use regulation, or otherwise, the requirement of an accurate survey map or other sufficient legal description of, and the notice to and listing of names and addresses of owners of real property in the area of the proposed change shall be waived. However, the proposed zoning map has been available for public inspection in the planning agency during all business hours for fifteen (15) days prior to the public hearing on such amendments. %.fl 1-\ M /4 Signature The fg ~ -- dffidavit of Notice" was acknowledged before me this ~D day of Uv., Â· . 6- , 2001, by |Dilli,6 0. TwmbÂ« WITNESS MY HAND AND OFFICIAL SEAL AgMTominission expirp: ~flÂ¢@'lte~ Ot--Â· Notf 7 JACQUE SCHOON,NOTARY PUBLIC MY COMMISSION EXPIRES 01/23/2004 WELLS FARGO BANK WEST N.A. P.O. BOX 0 ASPEN. COLORADO 81611 ATTACHMENTS: COPY OF THE PUBLICATION PHOTOGRAPH OF THE POSTED NOTICE (SIGN) LIST OF THE OWNERS AND GOVERNMENTAL AGENCIES NOTICED BY MAIL v OCT-09-01 08:01 AM WPA 9709204461 P.02 AFFIDAVIT OF PUBLIC NOTICE REQUIRED BY SECTION 26.304.060 (E), ASPEN LAND USE CODE PA-.rUIL. ADDRESS OF PROPERTY: -3 1 1 15744 T CO Op en- , Aspen, CO SCHEDULED PUBLIC HEARING DATE: DOT- 10 , lou- STATE OF COLORADO ) County of Pitkin ) 641L ONE . (name, please print) being or representing an Applicant to the City ofAspen, Colorado, hereby personally certify that I have complied with the public notice requirements of Section 26.304.060 (E) of the Aspen Land Use Code in the following manner: Publication of notice: By the publication in the legal notice section of an official paper or a paper of general circulation in the City of Aspen at least 5 Been (15) days prior to the public hearing. A copy ofthepublication is attached hereto. Posting of notice: By posting of notice, which form was obtained from the Community Development Department, which was made of suitable, waterproof materials, which was not less than twenty-two (22) inches wide and twenty-six (26) inches high, and which was composed of letters not less than one inch in height, Said notice was posted at least ten (10) days prior to the public hearing and was continuously visible from the day of . 200 , to and including the date and time of the public hearing. A photograph of the posted notice (sign) is attached hereto. ><__ Mailing qfnotice. By the mailing of a notice obtained from the Community Development Department, which contains the information described in Section 26.304.060(E)(2) of the Aspen Land Use Code. At least ten (10) days prior to the public hearing, notice was hand delivered or mailed by first class, postage prepid U.S. mail to all owners ofproperty within three hundred (300) feet ofthe property subject to the development application, and, at least fifteen (15) days prior to the public hearing, notice was hand delivered or mailed by first class postage prepaid U.S. mail to any federal agency, state, county, municipal government, school, service district or other governmental or quasi-governmental agency that owns property within three hundred (300) fbet of the property subject to the development application. The names and addresses of property owners shall be those on the current tax records ofPitkin County as they appeared no more than sixty (60) days prior to the date ofthe pubhc hearing, A copy ofthe owners and governmental agencies so noticed is attached hereto. (continued on next page) 0 01 08:01 AM WPA 9709204461 P.03 Rezoning or text amendment. Whenever the official zoning district map is in any way to be changed or amended incidental to or as part of a general revision of this Title, or whenever the text of this Title is to be amended, whether such revision be made by repeal of this Title and enactment of a new land use regulation, or otherwise, the requirement of an accurate survey map or other sufficient legal description of, and the notice to and listing of names and addresses ofowners of real property in the area of the proposed change shall be waived. However, the proposed zoning map has been available for public inspection in the planning agency during all business hours for fifteen (15) days prior to the public hearing on such amendments. Signature The R,regoing"Affidavit ofNotice" was acknowledged before me this ~- day of Ounb-2Â¥ _, 2001, by ALi ~ 6Â·11-f- WITNESS MY HAND AND OFFICIAL SEAL Mycommission expires: (0-6--2,004 WLQL. An,2 2.- - Â· ~fary Public ATTACHMENTS: COPY OF THE PUBLICATION PHOTOGRAPH OF THE POSTED NOTICE (SIGN) LIST OF THE OWNERS AND GOVERNMENTAL AGENCIES NOTICED BY MAIL OWNERN, ADDRESS1 ADDRESS2 CITY IPCODE 1000 EAST INS LLC 215 S MONARCH #101D ASPEN C 81611 1000 EAST HOPKINS LLC 215 S MONARCH #101 D ASPEN CO 81611 1000 EAST HOPKINS LLC PARK CENTRAL CONDO/C/O R BRANING CPA@ 215 S MONARCH #203 ASPEN CO 81611 1000 EAST HOPKINS LLC PARK CENTRAL CONDO/C/O R BRANING CPA 215 S MONARCH#203 ASPEN CO 81611 401 COOPER PARTNERS FLEISHER COMPANY C/O 200 E MAIN ST ASPEN CO 81611 407 EAST HYMAN PROPERTY LTD 34425 HWY 82 ASPEN CO 81611 419 EAST HYMAN LLC C/O TED C SKOKOS 425 W CAPITAL AVE STE 3200 LITTLE ROCK AR 72201 419 EAST HYMAN LLC C/O TED C SKOKOS 425 W CAPITAL AVE STE 3200 LITTLE ROCK AR 77201 419 EAST HYMAN LLC C/O TED C SKOKOS 425 W CAPITAL AVE STE 3200 LITTLE ROCK AR 72201 419 EAST HYMAN LLC C/O TED C SKOKOS 425 W CAPITAL AVE STE 3200 LITTLE ROCK AR 72201 419 EAST HYMAN LLC C/O TED C SKOKOS 425 W CAPITAL AVE STE 3200 LITTLE ROCK AR 72201 ALEXANDER JUDY 2121 NW FRONTAGE RD #254 VAIL CO 81657 ALYEMENI MOHAMMED & ALICE 819 LINWOOD RD MOORESVILLE NC 28115 ANDERSEN PAUL EGON 488 CASTLE CREEK RD ASPEN CO 81611-3110 ASPEN ART INVESTMENTS LTD 1450 SIERRA VISTA DR #B ASPEN - CO 81611 ASPEN ART INVESTMENTS LTD 1450 SIERRA VISTA DR #B ASPEN CO 81611 ASPEN SPORTS INC C/O BECKER BUSINESS SERVICES 630 E HYMAN AVE ASPEN CO 81611 B & K ASSOCIATES A COLORADO GENERAL PARTNERSHIP 308 S MILL ST ASPEN CO 81611 BAKER CHARLES E JR 50% 333 E 75TH NEW YORK NY 10021 BALDERSON CABELL LLC C/O BURKE AND NICKEL 3336 E 32ND ST STE 217 TULSA OK 74135 BATES NATHANIEL B TRUST PO BOX 9909 ASPEN CO 81612 BENT FORK LLC PO BOX 9197 ASPEN CO 81612 BENTLEYS AT THE WHEELER PO BOX 10370 ASPEN CO 81612 BIDWELL BERT INVESTMENT CORPORATION PO BOX 567 ASPEN CO 81612 BIRKWOOD ASSOCIATES A COLORADO PARTNERSHIP P O BOX 3421 ASPEN CO 81612 BOGIN ROBERT M & KIMBERLY B 17 APPLE LN CALIFON NJ 07830 BOUNDY RICHARD R 906 W SUGNET RD MIDLAND MI 48640 BRIGHT GALEN PO BOX 1848 ASPEN CO 81612 BRINING ROBERT 215 S MONARCH ST STE 203 ASPEN CO 81611 BRINING ROBERT 215 S MONARCH ST STE 203 ASPEN CO 81611 BRINING ROBERT D 215 S MONARCH #203 ASPEN CO 81611 BUSH ALAN DAVID 0046 HEATHER LANE ASPEN CO 81611 CARLSON BRUCE E PO BOX 3587 ASPEN CO 81612 CARLSON BRUCE E PO BOX 3587 ASPEN CO 81612 CARRIGAN RICHARD A JR FERMILABS KIRK AND WILSON ROADS BALAVIA IL 60510 CHARLIES COW COMPANY LLC 315 E HYMAN AVE ASPEN CO 81611 CHARLIES COW COMPANY LLC 315 E HYMAN AVE ASPEN CO 81611 CHARLIES COW COMPANY LLC 315 E HYMAN AVE ASREN. CO 81611 CHICAGO SNOWFLAKE INVESTMENT GROUP INC C/O SHELL PROPERTIES CORP 40 SKOKIE BLVD - STE 350 NORTHBROOK IL 60062 CITY OF ASPEN 130 S GALENA ST ASPEN CO 81611 CITY OF ASPEN 130 S GALENA ST ASPEN CO 81611 CITY OF ASPEN 130 S GALENA ST ASPEN CO 81611 CITY OF ASPEN 130 S GALENA ST ASPEN CO 81611 CLARK ANDREA P O BOX 6452 CHICAGO IL 60680-6452 CLARK WILLIAM E & LOIS P PO BOX 362 ASPEN CO 81612 CLARK WILLIAM E & LOIS P PO BOX 362 ASPEN CO 81612 CLARK WILLIAM E & LOIS P PO BOX 362 ASPEN CO 81612 CLARK WILLIAM E & LOIS P PO BOX 362 ASPEN CO 81612 CLASEN NORMAN E & LAURA B PO BOX 1155 BASALT CO 81621 CLAUSEN FAMILY TRUST NO 1 C/O HYNDS JOHN W TRUSTEE PO BOX 685 MORRIS IL 60450 COHEN ARTHUR S IBSEN 72 MEXICO CITY, MEXICO 11560 COMCOWICH WILLIAM L TRUSTEE OF ROBERT BARNARD TRUST 420 W MAIN ST ASPEN CO 81611 COMCOWICH WILLIAM L TRUSTEE OF ROBERT BARNARD TRUST 420 W MAIN ST ASPEN CO 81611 COMCOWICH WILLIAM L TRUSTEE OF ROBERT BARNARD TRUST 420 W MAIN ST ASPEN CO 81611 CONTINENTAL DIVIDE CO A COLORADO CORP 230 S MILL ST ASPEN CO 81611 CONTINENTAL DIVIDE CO A COLORADO CORP 230 S MILL ST ASPEN CO 81611 CONTINENTAL DIVIDE CO A COLORADO CORP 230 S MILL ST ASPEN CO 81611 Page 1 of 6 CONTINEI IDE CO A COLORADO CORP 230 S MILL ST ASPEN 1611 CONTINEN IDE CO A COLORADO CORP 230 S MILL ST ASPEN 81611 COTTONWOOD VENTURES I LLC 419 E HYMAN AVE ASPEN CO 81611 COTTONWOOD VENTURES 11 LLC 419 E HYMAN AVE ASPEN CO 81611 COTTONWOOD VENTURES 11 LLC 419 E HYMAN AVE ASPEN CO 81611 COX JAMES E & NANCY C/O ROB SNYDER 304 S GALENA STE A ASPEN CO 81611 CROW MARGERY K & PETER D 46103 HIGHWAY 6 & 24 GLENWOOD SPRINGS CO 81601 CRYSTAL PALACE CORPORATION PO BOX 32 ASPEN CO 81612 CYS RICHARD L AND KAREN L 5301 CHAMBERLIN AVE CHEVY CHASE MD 20815 DAVIDSON DONALD W 864 CEMETERY LN ASPEN CO 81611 DAVIDSON DONALD W 864 CEMETERY LN ASPEN CO 81611 DAVIDSON DONALD W 864 CEMETERY LN ASPEN CO 81611 DAVIS HORN INCORPORATED 215 S MONARCH #104 ASPEN CO 81611 DAVIS HORN INCORPORATED 215 S MONARCH #104 ASPEN CO 81611 DAVIS HORN INCORPORATED 215 S MONARCH #104 ASPEN CO 81611 DAVIS HORN INCORPORATED 215 S MONARCH #104 ASPEN CO 81611 DAVIS HORN INCORPORATED 50% INT 215 S MONARCH #104 ASPEN CO 81611 DENSON JAMES D PO BOX 4120 AVON CO 81620 DENSON JAMES D PO BOX 4120 AVON CO 81620 DIXON R MC FARLAND 3141 HOOD ST DALLAS TX 75219 DIXON ROGER M 3141 HOOD ST 6TH FLOOR LEE PARK CENTER DALLAS TX 75219 DOLE MARGARET M C/O FIRST NATIONAL BANK OF CEDARIDGE PO BOX 8455 ASPEN CO 81612 DONCER JOYCE TRUST 7641 W 123RD PL PALOS HEIGHTS IL 60463 DONCER JOYCE TRUSTEE FOR THE DONCER JOYCE L TRUST 7641 W 123RD PL PALOS HEIGHTS IL 60463 DUVIKE INC PO BOX 2238 ASPEN CO 81612 DUVIKE INC PO BOX 2238 ASPEN CO 81612 DUVIKE INC PO BOX 2238 ASPEN CO 81612 DUVIKE INC PO BOX 2238 ASPEN CO 81612 DUVIKE INC PO BOX 2238 ASPEN CO 81612 DUVIKE INC PO BOX 2238 ASPEN CO 81612 DUVIKE INC PO BOX 2238 ASPEN CO 81612 DUVIKE INC PO BOX 2238 ASPEN CO 81612 EVANS DAVID COURTNEY PO BOX 952 ASPEN CO 81612 FAIRHOLME INVESTMENTS LTD C/O MARINI & ASSOCIATES TWO S BISCAYNE BLVD STE 3580 MIAMI FL 33131 FEDER HAROLD L FEDER ZETTA F 210 E HYMAN AVE #4 ASPEN CO 81611-2912 FLEISHER DONALD J 200 E MAIN ST ASPEN CO 81611 FOOTLOOSE MOCCASIN MAKERS INC 240 S MILL ST STE 201 ASPEN CO 81611 FREDRICK LARRY D 215 S MONARCH STE G101 ASPEN CO 81611 FREDRICK LARRY D ROBERTS JANET A AS JOINT TENANTS 215 S MONARCH STE G101 ASPEN CO 81611 FREDRICK LARRY D ROBERTS JANET A AS JOINT TENANTS 215 S MONARCH STE G101 ASPEN CO 81611 FYRWALD JON ERIK & GUDRUN L 915 CECIL ROAD WILMINGTON DE 19807 GOLDEN HORN BUILDING LTD A COLORADO LIMITED PARTNERSHIP PO BOX 7943 ASPEN CO 81612 GOLDEN HORN BUILDING LTD A COLORADO LIMITED PARTNERSHIP PO BOX 7943 ASPEN CO 81612 GOLDEN HORN BUILDING LTD A COLORADO LIMITED PARTNERSHIP PO BOX 7943 ASPEN CO 81612 GOLDEN HORN BUILDING LTD A COLORADO LIMITED PARTNERSHIP PO BOX 7943 ASPEN CO 81612 GOLDSTEIN ALAN J GOLDSTEIN MANAGEMENT C/O 150 METTRO PARK #2 ROCHESTER NY 14623 GOLDSTEIN PETER & ALAN 150 METRO PK #2 ROCHESTER NY 14623 IGOODING RICHARD L 1200 17TH ST STE 2660 DENVER CO 80202 GRAND ASPEN LODGING LLC 308 S GALENA ST ASPEN CO 81611 GRAND FINALE LTD PO BOX 32 ASPEN CO 81612 GRAND SLAM HOLDINGS LLC C/O CARL B LINNECKE CPA PC 215 S MONARCH ST - STE# 101 ASPEN CO 81611 GRAND SLAM HOLDINGS LLC C/O CARL B LINNECKE CPA PC 215 S MONARCH ST - STE# 101 ASPEN CO 81611 GRAND SLAM HOLDINGS LLC C/O CARL B LINNECKE CPA PC 215 S MONARCH ST - STE# 101 ASREN CO 81611 GREENWOOD KAREN DAY & STERLING JAMES 409 E COOPER AVE ASPEN CO 81611 GRIFFITH ANGELINE M 530 WALNUT ST ASPEN CO 81611 GUTNER KENNETH H REVOCABLE TRUST GUTNER KENNETH H TRUSTEE PO BOX 11001 ASPEN CO 81612 HABATAT GALLERIES ASPEN INC HAGOP[AN SANDY C/O 213 S MILL ST ASPEN CO 81611 HAMPEL WALTER F JR 290 HEATHER LN ASPEN CO 81611 Page 2 of 6 HART GE( 'ID & SARAH G PO BOX 5491 SNOWMASS VILLAGE 1615 HARTMAN PARTNERSHIP LTD 209 W FELICITY ST ANGOLA 1 46703 HATCHER HUGH S & JENNIFER M 2806 DUMBARTON ST NW WASHINGTON DC 20007 HERSHBERGER PHILIP G 2737 CLUB TERR FT WAYNE IN 46804 HILL EUGENE D JR 1/2 3910 S HILLCREST DR DENVER CO 80237 HILLIS OF SNOWMASS INC 170 E GORE CRK VAIL CO 81657 IMMOBILIEN LLC C/O NATIONAL TAX SEARCH LLC PO BOX 81290 CHICAGO IL 60681-0290 J & E HANSEN LLC C/O EDWARD HANSEN 204 E DURANT AVE ASPEN CO 81611 JACOBSON FAMILY TRUST 2168 SANTA MARGARITA DR FALLBROOK CA 92028 JOHNSON PETER C & SANDRA K 215 S MONARCH ST STE G103 ASPEN CO 81611 JOHNSON PETER C & SANDRA K 215 S MONARCH ST STE G103 ASPEN CO 81611 JOHNSON PETER C & SANDRA K 215 S MONARCH ST STE G103 ASPEN CO 81611 JOHNSON PETER C & SANDRA K 215 S MONARCH ST STE G103 ASPEN CO 81611 KANADA KENICHI 611 S MONARCH ST #1 ASPEN CO 81611 KANTZER TAYLOR MICHAEL FAMILY TRUST #1 6501 VISTA DEL MAR PLAYA DEL REY CA 90293 KANTZER TAYLOR MICHAEL FAMILY TRUST #1 6501 VISTA DEL MAR PLAYA DEL REY CA 90293 KAPLAN BARBARA 3076 EDGEWOOD RD PEPPER PIKE OH 44124 KAUFMAN GIDEON I 315 E HYMAN AVE STE 305 ASPEN CO 81611 KAUFMAN GIDEON I 315 E HYMAN AVE STE 305 ASPEN CO 81611 KELLY PROPERTIES INC PO BOX 8429 ASPEN CO 81612 KELLY PROPERTIES INC PO BOX 8429 ASPEN CO 81612 KELLY PROPERTIES INC PO BOX 8429 ASPEN CO 81612 KLEINER JOHN P 55 SECOND ST COLORADO SPRINGS CO 80906 KULLGREN NANCY A 205 E DURANT AVE UNIT 2-C ASPEN CO 81611 L P C COMPANY INC A COLORADO CORPORATION PO BOX 362 ASPEN CO 81612 L P C COMPANY INC A COLORADO CORPORATION PO BOX 362 ASPEN CO 81612 L P C COMPANY INC A COLORADO CORPORATION PO BOX 362 ASPEN CO 81612 L P C COMPANY INC A COLORADO CORPORATION PO BOX 362 ASPEN CO 81612 L P C COMPANY INC A COLORADO CORPORATION PO BOX 362 ASPEN CO 81612 L P C COMPANY INC A COLORADO CORPORATION PO BOX 362 ASPEN CO 81612 LADD EDWIN V JR & WILMA C 51 GREAT MEADOW LN AVON CT 06001-4549 LAMAN WILLIAM H AND E MARGRIT 2301 CALLE LOS ALTOS TUCSON AZ 85718 LEATHERMAN ROBERT D PO BOX 11930 ASPEN CO 81612 LE\A' HELEN JOAN TRUST 421 WARWICK RD KENILWORTH IL 60043 LEWIS PERRY HEARTLAND PARTNERS 55 RAILROAD AVENUE GREENWICH CT 06830 LIMELITE INC A COLORADO CORPORATION 228 E COOPER AVE ASPEN CO 81611 LIMELITE INC 228 E COOPER ASPEN CO 81611 LIMELITE INC PAAS LEROY G 228 E COOPER AVE ASPEN CO 81611 LINDNER FRITZ & ERIKA 66966 TEN PEAKS CT BEND OR 97701-9277 LOCHHEAD RAYMOND R & EMILIE M 200 SHERWOOD RD PASO ROBLES CA 93446 LOCHHEAD RAYMOND R & EMILIE M 200 SHERWOOD PASO ROBLES CA 93446 LOMA ALTA CORPORATION 6210 N CENTRAL EXPWY DALLAS TX 75206 MCDONALDS CORPORATION 05/152 REAL ESTATE TAX SECTION PO BOX 66207 CHICAGO IL 60666 MCDONALDS CORPORATION 05/152 REAL ESTATE TAX SECTION PO BOX 66207 CHICAGO IL 60666 MCDONALDS CORPORATION 05/152 REAL ESTATE TAX SECTION PO BOX 66207 CHICAGO IL 60666 MCDONALDS CORPORATION 05/152 REAL ESTATE TAX SECTION PO BOX 66207 CHICAGO IL 60666 MEEKER RICHARD J AND ALLISON D 0752 MEADOWOOD DR ASPEN CO 81611 MESSNER CHRISTIAN 13320 MULHOLLAND DR BEVERLY HILLS CA 90210 MEYER BUSINESS BUILDING LLC 23655 TWO RIVERS RD BASALT CO 81621 MORRONGIELLO CHARLES AND MORRONGIELLO LYDIA 18 SCHOOL LN LLOYD HARBOR NY 11743 MORRONGIELLO CHARLES T MORRONGIELLO LYDIA A 18 SCHOOL LN LLOYD HARBOR NY 11743 MOUNTAIN CHALET ENTERPRISES INC 333 E DURANT AVE ASPEN CO 81611 MSE ASPEN HOLDINGS LTD 1575 PONCE DE LEON FORT LAUDERDALE FL 33316 MTN ENTERPRISES 80B C/O HILLIS OF SNOWMASS 170 GARE CRK DR VAIL CO 81657 NEWMAN KERRY J & RICKI R 617 PRINCE DR NEWBURGH IN 47630 OBRIEN MAUREEN 215 S MONARCH ST G102 ASPEN CO 81611 OBRIEN MAUREEN 215 S MONARCH ST G102 ASPEN CO 81611 ORR ROBERT L 500 PATTERSON RD GRAND JUNCTION CO 81506 Page 3 of 6 ORR ROB 500 PATTERSON RD GRAND JUNCTION 1506 ORR ROBE 500 PATTERSON RD GRAND JUNCTION 81506 ORR ROBERT L 500 PATTERSON RD GRAND JUNCTION CO 81506 ORR ROBERT L 500 PATTERSON RD GRAND JUNCTION CO 81506 ORR ROBERT L 500 PATTERSON RD GRAND JUNCTION CO 81506 ORR ROBERT L 500 PATTERSON RD GRAND JUNCTION CO 81506 ORR ROBERT L 500 PATTERSON RD GRAND JUNCTION CO 81506 PARAMOUNT INVESTMENTS INC A DELAWARE CORP C/O WILLIAM POPE 540 W SMUGGLER ASPEN CO 81611 PARK CENTRAL CONDO ASSOC 215 S MONARCH ST STE 203 ASPEN CO 81611 PASCO PROPERTIES COLORADO LLC SMITH PATRICK A P O BOX 688 BLOOMFIELD HILLS MI 48303 PETERSON BROOKE A C/O KAUFMAN & PETERSON 315 E HYMAN ASPEN CO 81611 PETERSON BROOKE A C/O KAUFMAN & PETERSON 315 E HYMAN ASPEN CO 81611 PETERSON BROOKE A C/O KAUFMAN & PETERSON 315 E HYMAN ASPEN CO 81611 PEYTON MARI 409 E COOPER #4 STE 1 ASPEN CO 81611 PICARD DEBORA J & DOUGLAS M 2600 GARDEN ROAD - STE 222 MONTERREY CA 93940-5322 PRODINGERIRMA PO BOX 1245 ASPEN CO 81612 PROSPECTOR FRACTIONAL OWNERS ASSOC 301 E HYMAN AVE #108 ASPEN CO 81611 PROSPECTOR FRACTIONAL OWNERS ASSOC 301 E HYMAN AVE #108 ASPEN CO 81611 PROSPECTOR FRACTIONAL OWNERS ASSOC 301 E HYMAN AVE #108 ASPEN CO 81611 PROSPECTOR FRACTIONAL OWNERS ASSOC 301 E HYMAN AVE #108 ASPEN CO 81611 PROSPECTOR FRACTIONAL OWNERS ASSOC 301 E HYMAN AVE #108 ASPEN CO 81611 PROSPECTOR FRACTIONAL OWNERS ASSOC 301 E HYMAN AVE #108 ASPEN CO 81611 PROSPECTOR FRACTIONAL OWNERS ASSOC 301 E HYMAN AVE #108 ASPEN CO 81611 PROSPECTOR FRACTIONAL OWNERS ASSOC 301 E HYMAN AVE #108 ASPEN CO 81611 PROSPECTOR FRACTIONAL OWNERS ASSOC 301 E HYMAN AVE #108 . ASPEN CO 81611 PROSPECTOR FRACTIONAL OWNERS ASSOC 301 E AYMAN AVE #108 ASPEN CO 81611 PROSPECTOR FRACTIONAL OWNERS ASSOC 301 E HYMAN AVE #108 ASPEN CO 81611 PROSPECTOR FRACTIONAL OWNERS ASSOC 301 E HYMAN AVE #108 ASPEN CO 81611 PROSPECTOR FRACTIONAL OWNERS ASSOC 301 E HYMAN AVE #108 ASPEN CO 81611 PROSPECTOR FRACTIONAL OWNERS ASSOC 301 E HYMAN AVE #108 ASPEN CO 81611 PROSPECTOR FRACTIONAL OWNERS ASSOC 301 E HYMAN AVE #108 ASPEN CO 81611 PROSPECTOR FRACTIONAL OWNERS ASSOC 301 E HYMAN AVE #108 ASPEN CO 81611 PROSPECTOR FRACTIONAL OWNERS ASSOC 301 E HYMAN AVE #108 ASPEN CO 81611 PROSPECTOR FRACTIONAL OWNERS ASSOC 301 E HYMAN AVE #108 ASPEN CO 81611 PROSPECTOR FRACTIONAL OWNERS ASSOC 301 E HYMAN AVE #108 ASPEN CO 81611 PROSPECTOR FRACTIONAL OWNERS ASSOC 301 E HYMAN AVE #108 ASPEN CO 81611 RACZAK JOSEPH S & JANET L 0234 LIGHT HILL RD SNOWMASS CO 81654 RED ONION INVESTORS LLC C/O RED ONION MGT CO 418 E COOPER #205 ATTN: CHARLES B ISRAEL ASPEN CO 81611 RED ONION INVESTORS LLC C/O RED ONION MGT CO 418 E COOPER #205 ATTN: CHARLES B ISRAEL ASPEN CO 81611 .RED ONION INVESTORS LLC C/O RED ONION MGT CO 418 E COOPER #205 ATTN: CHARLES B ISRAEL ASPEN CO 81611 RED ONION INVESTORS LLC C/O RED ONION MGT CO 418 E COOPER #205 ATTN: CHARLES B ISRAEL ASPEN CO 81611 RED ONION INVESTORS LLC C/O RED ONION MGT CO 418 E COOPER #205 ATTN: CHARLES B ISRAEL ASPEN CO 81611 RED ONION INVESTORS LLC C/O RED ONION MGT CO 418 E COOPER #205 ATTN: CHARLES B ISRAEL ASPEN CO 81611 RED ONION INVESTORS LLC C/O RED ONION MGT CO 418 E COOPER #205 ATTN: CHARLES B ISRAEL ASPEN CO 81611 RENO ASPEN PROPERTIES LLC 210 E HYMAN AVE #202 ASPEN CO 81611 RENO ASPEN PROPERTIES LLC 210 E HYMAN AVE #202 ASPEN CO 81611 RYANCO PARTNERS LTD XXX C/O SMITH PAT 415 E HYMAN AVE STE 105 ASPEN CO 81611-1945 RYANCO PARTNERS LTD XXX C/O SMITH PAT 415 E HYMAN AVE STE 105 ASPEN CO 81611-1945 RYANCO PARTNERS LTD XXX C/O SMITH PAT 415 E HYMAN AVE STE 105 ASPEN CO 81611-1945 RYANCO PARTNERS LTD XXX C/O SMITH PAT 415 E HYMAN AVE STE 105 ASPEN CO 81611-1945 RYANCO PARTNERS LTD)00< C/O SMITH PAT 415 E HYMAN AVE STE 105 ASPEN CO 81611-1945 RYANCO PARTNERS LTD XXX C/O SMITH PAT 415 E HYMAN AVE STE 105 ASPEN CO 81611-1945 RYANCO PARTNERS LTD XXX C/O SMITH PAT . 415 E HYMAN AVE STE 105 ASPEN CO 81611-1945 RYANCO PARTNERS LTD)00< C/O SMITH PAT 415 E HYMAN AVE STE 105 ASPEN CO 81611-1945 RYANCO PARTNERS LTD XXX C/O SMITH PAT 415 E HYMAN AVE STE 105 ASPEN CO 81611-1945 RYANCO PARTNERS LTD)00< C/O SMITH PAT 415 E HYMAN AVE STE 105 ASPEN CO 81611-1945 RYANCO PARTNERS LTD)00< C/O SMITH PAT 415 E HYMAN AVE STE 105 ASPEN CO 81611-1945 RYANCO PARTNERS LTD)00< C/O SMITH PAT 415 E HYMAN AVE STE 105 ASPEN CO 81611-1945 Page 4 of 6 . RYANCO S LTD XXX C/O SMITH PAT 415 E HYMAN AVE STE 105 ASPEN 1611-1945 RYANCO P RS LTD)00< C/O SMITH PAT 415 E HYMAN AVE STE 105 ASPEN 81611-1945 SAUNDERS-WHITE CAROL REV TRUST PO BOX 8100 ASPEN CO 81612 SCHAYER CHARLES M 111 HORTON KAREN JANE TRUST 588 S PONTIAC WAY DENVER CO 80224 SCHROEDER C M JR SCHROEDER BETTY ANN 3629 ROCKBRIDGE RD COLUMBIA SC 29206 SCULL JAMES E PO BOX 2051 ASPEN CO 81612 SHAW ROBERT W PO BOX 121157 FORT WORTH TX 76121 SHEFFER BARBARA & DOUGLAS PO BOX 250 ASPEN CO 81612 SHENNAN MELISSA A 2036 N BISSELL ST CHICAGO IL 60614 SHOAF JEFFREY S PO BOX 3123 ASPEN CO 81612 SILVER CIRCLE RINK LLC ICE RINK 308 S GALENA ST ASPEN CO 81611 SILVERMAN MARC A & MARILYN L 937 DALE RD MEADOWBROOK PA 19046 SLT ASPEN DEAN STREET LLC . C/O STARWOOD HOTELS & RESORTS TRUST 2231 E CAMELBACK RD STE 410 PHOENIX AZ 85016 SMITH RONA K 601 S MONARCH #4 ASPEN CO 81611 SMITH RONA K 1742 HILLSIDE RD STEVENSON MD 21153 SOUTH POINT CONDOMINIUM ASSOCIATION 205 E DURANT AVE #2F ASPEN CO 81611 SOUTHPOINT-SUMNER CORPORATION 4828 FORT SUMNER DR BETHESDA MD 20816 SPAULDING RICHARD W & THOMPSON ELEANOR M AS JT TENANTS PO BOX 292 CONCORD MA 01742 STROH GEORGE C 8525 SKYLAND DR NIWOT CO 80503 SULLIVAN JOHN B SULLVAN JUNE A PO BOX 367 SAVANNA IL 61074-0367 SULLIVAN PHILIP 1960 QUEBEC ST DENVER CO 80220-1926 SUMMIT VIEW INC 248 WASHINGTON ST TOMS RIVER NJ 08754 TANGUAY MICHAEL LAWRENCE 319 MBC STE G ASPEN CO 81611-3516 TOWNE PLACE OF ASPEN CONDO ASSOC INC C/O ASPEN LODGING COMPANY 747 S GALENA ST ASPEN CO 81611 TRUE NINA W 215 S MONARCH ST #102 ASPEN CO 81611 TRUE NINA W 215 S MONARCH ST #102 ASPEN CO 81611 TRUE NINA W 215 S MONARCH ST #102 ASPEN CO 81611 TRUE NINA W 215 S MONARCH ST #102 ASPEN CO 81611 TRUE NINA W 215 S MONARCH ST #102 ASPEN CO 81611 TRUE NINA W 215 S MONARCH ST #102 ASPEN CO 81611 VANTONGEREN HAROLD V & LIDIA M 2000 E 12TH AVE BOX 8 DENVER CO 80206 WALTERS 1/5 & ROLLINS 1/5 & GORMAN 1/5 SMITH 1/5 & BONDS 1/5 7350 W FAIRVIEW DR LITTLETON CO 80128 WEBSTER HUNTER M PO BOX 2366 ASPEN CO 81611 WENDELIN ASSOC A NEW YORK GENERAL PARTNERSHIP 150 METRO PARK ROCHESTER NY 14623 WENDELIN ASSOC A NEW YORK GENERAL PARTNERSHIP 150 METRO PARK ROCHESTER NY 14623 WENDELIN ASSOC A NEW YORK GENERAL PARTNERSHIP 150 METRO PARK ROCHESTER NY 14623 WENDELIN ASSOC A NEW YORK GENERAL PARTNERSHIP 150 METRO PARK ROCHESTER NY 14623 WENDELIN ASSOC A NEW YORK GENERAL PARTNERSHIP 150 METRO PARK ROCHESTER NY 14623 WHEELER SQUARE - CASPER FAM LY LLC 315 E HYMAN ASPEN CO 81611 WHEELER SQUARE - CASPER FAM LY LLC 315 E HYMAN ASPEN CO 81611 WHEELER SQUARE - CASPER FAM LY LLC 315 E HYMAN ASPEN CO 81611 WHEELER SQUARE - CASPER FAM LY LLC 315 E HYMAN ASPEN CO 81611 WHEELER SQUARE - CASPER FAM LY LLC 315 E HYMAN ASPEN CO 81611 WHEELER SQUARE - CASPER FAM LY LLC 315 E HYMAN ASREN CO 81611 WHEELER SQUARE - CASPER FAM LY LLC 315 E HYMAN ASPEN CO 81611 WHEELER SQUARE - CASPER FAM LY LLC 315 E HYMAN ASPEN CO 81611 WHEELER SQUARE - CASPER FAM LY LLC 315 E HYMAN ASPEN CO 81611 WHEELER SQUARE - CASPER FAM LY LLC 315 E HYMAN ASPEN CO 81611 WHEELER SQUARE - CASPER FAM LY LLC 315 E HYMAN ASPEN CO 81611 WHEELER SQUARE - CASPER FAM LY LLC 315 E HYMAN ASPEN CO 81611 WHEELER SQUARE - CASPER FAM LY LLC 315 E HYMAN ASPEN CO 81611 WHEELER SQUARE - CASPER FAM LY LLC 315 E HYMAN ASPEN CO 81611 WHEELER SQUARE - CASPER FAM LY LLC 315 E HYMAN ASPEN CO 81611 WHITAKER PATRICIA D 3 LADUE LN ST LOUIS MO 63163 WHITMAN WENDALIN 210 E HYMAN AVE #101 ASPEN CO 81611 WHITMER GORDON L ROSS HOWARD P O BOX 114 ASPEN CO 81612 WOLK PAUL REVOCABLE TRUST 4868 THE DELL LN HUME VA 22639 WOLK PAUL REVOCABLE TRUST 4868 THE DELL LN HUME VA 22639 Page 5 of 6 WOODSOÂ£ ~NA D P O BOX 125 TETON VILLAGE I-~33025 ZOLLER L/~~CE & HELEN 50.8% C/O STEPHEN ZOLLER 1032 TIA JUANA ST LAGUNA BEACH ~92651 Page 6 of 6 UD MEETING DATE: /01(0/01 EXHIBIT -7- NAME OF PROJECT: 51_00 1Â£14 044-k , 10-/0 - 0-00, CLERI*f>Â©Â©04 1-1 STAFFLjLA/,t WITNESSES: C 1~~L '~)(Llttqp (2) (3) (4) (5) EXHIBITS: 1 Staff Report 8/) (Checyf Applicable) 2 Affidavit of Notice (~ (Check If Applicable) 3 Board Criteria Sheet C ) (Check If Applicable) be/OU 4 [Â·Â©Rff/z0p91 fli . 12>Â£4 dir 714- (-Cui JAYL) ci,1 W 111 6149,; 4 5 MOTION: 44ft# 1*440.040* 0-7 64 044 1 2 J 4 Y 04 (Â»644 -3 X /7 , h.0,0 uoccd 01*~-UP v 4,â€¢ 1 1,31 \ ~2~k.h./~1 4- VOTE: YES 61 7-0 SUZANNAH REID PES 12 NO ___ 3*EJ2N=aesâ‚¬~eD-Â·Â¥ES~zE=NO:~ 1**NBemNâ‚¬m)~~Â·Â¥ES==at-NO- GILBERT SANCHEZ YES V' NO LISA MARKALUNAS YES Clo JEFFREY HALFERTY YES P'01 0 RALLY DUPPS 'Â¥Es\ZC10 2 -l tu-tk~e,~r- vEâ€¢s=Nu- - YES NO -fbELL *k.,#YES Uf20_ ti*ft~zeb % 0,1 Lilict 90'H,IAL HPCVOTE 1%12 1/ 0 AFFIDAVIT OF PUBLIC NOTICE REQUIRED BY SECTION 26.304.060 (E), ASPEN LAND USE CODE ADDRESS OF PROPERTY: 3 05 S . 3 w St . , Aspen, CO SCHEDULED PUBLIC HEARING DATE: OCT, joil , 200_L STATE OF COLORADO ) ) SS. County of Pitkin ) I, 3-1â‚¬VE- A. DIAA) u F.F (name, please print) being or representing an Applicant to the City ofAspen, Colorado, hereby personally certify that I have complied with the public notice requirements of Section 26.304.060 (E) of the Aspen Land Use Code in the following manner: 4 Publication of notice: By the publication in the legal notice section of an o fficial paper or a paper of general circulation in the City ofAspen at least fifteen (15) days prior to the public hearing. A copy ofthepublication is attached hereto. V~ Posting of notice: By posting o f notice, whif~Â¢~rth :W*i#hained from the Community Development Department, whighlwds made 642;able, waterproofmaterials, which was not less than ,twed*No (22) *ches wide and twenty-six (26) inches high, and which wis 66%#a otl#tem not less than one inch in height. Said notice was Abted at leas<â‚¬64 (10) days prior to the public hearing and was continuolikj~*i#iblfift;~ the&418ay of S EFT. , 200 1 , to and including-de date and time of the public hear\ng. A photograph of the posted notice (sign) is attached hereto. ~ Mailing of notice. By the mailing of a notice obtained from the Community Development Department, which contains the information described in Section 26.304.060(E)(2) of the Aspen Land Use Code. At least ten (10) days prior to the public hearing, notice was hand delivered or mailed by first class, postage prepaid U.S. mail to all owners of property within three hundred (300) feet of the property subject to the development application, and, at least fifteen (15) days prior to the public hearing, notice was hand delivered or mailed by first class postage prepaid U.S. mail to any federal agency, state, county, municipal government, school, service district or other governmental or quasi-governmental agency that owns property within three hundred (300) feet of the property subject to the development application. The names and addresses ofproperty owners shall be those on the current tax records of Pitkin County as they appeared no more than sixty (60) days prior to the date of the public hearing. A copy of the owners and 0 governmental agencies so noticed is attached hereto. (continued on next page) AlÂ» 104/0/0 1 Rezoning or text amendment. Whenever the official zoning district map is in any way to be changed or amended incidental to or as part of a general revision o f this Title, or whenever the text o f this Title is to be amended, whether such revision be made by repeal of this Title and enactment of a new land use regulation, or otherwise, the requirement of an accurate survey map or other sufficient legal description o f, and the notice to and listing of names and addresses of owners ofreal property in the area of the proposed change shall be waived. However, the proposed zoning map has been avilable for public inspection in the planning agency during all business hours for fifteen (1~) days prior to the public hearing on such amendments. / S*ature 0-1 711 A f, 1 j f, 1 ..0 /\ / 1 1/74 I The foregoing "Affidavit ofNotice" was acknowledÂ«URjef6re gg this~75 day of SU p.fovvilyck , 200.1 by \Act<Â£ 4,1,~6/ ~000=***~ WITNESS MY HAND AND OFFICIAL SEAL 5 x" VIC,0 "E *ly commission expires: dr] 1 00-es 001 1---1 joB L.N41Â£ t. / ~*AL LL_ L 0 Notary Public C nission Expires 05/07/2005 ATTACHMENTS: COPY OF THE PUBLICATION PHOTOGRAPH OF THE POSTED NOTICE (SIGN) LIST OF THE OWNERS AND GOVERNMENTAL AGENCIES NOTICED BY MAIL 0 . sherwinhpi007(160#1~jpeW I *t..i PUBUC NOTICE DATE 0 l OlD\ TIME % 00 PK PLACE LiTY-HALL )PURPOSE BKi r'lk lk, 1-21.-~ /lp\,d 11--Ilab=-L,~ r-CiR. A Ely\6LL:- 12. , khh\-T" wÂ¥,l \1\ 1 1 Mt- 9Â¢ 0 . 3 ..4 4 t 49 PUBLIC NOTICE - RE: 205 S. THIRD STREET- FINAL HPC REVIEW NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that a public hearing will be held on Wednesday, October 10, 2001 at a meeting to begin at 5:00 p.m. before the Aspen Historic Preservation Commission, Council Chambers, City Hall, 130 S. Galena St., Aspen, to consider an application submitted by Walter and Kitty Sherwin requesting Final HPC review for a small addition to the existing residence. The property is described as the east halfofLot G, Lots H and I, Block 39, City and Townsite ofAspen. For further information, contact Amy Guthrie at the Aspen/Pitkin Community Development Department, 130 S. Galena St., Aspen, CO (970) 920-5096, amvg@ci.aspen.co.us. s/Suzannah Reid. Chair Aspen Historic Preservation Commission Published in the Aspen Times on September 22, 2001 City of Aspen Account 0 0 ALG SECOND QUAL PERS RES TRUST ALH HOLDING COMPANY GUNNISON ASPEN HOMEOWNERS' ASSOCIATION C/O GILDENHORN ALMA L A COLORADO CORPORATION A COLO NON PROFIT CORPORATION 2030 24TH ST NW 435 W MAIN ST 311 W MAIN ST W HINGTON DC 20008 ASPEN CO 81611 ASPEN CO 81611 BLAU SETH J BARTON META PACKARD BEHRENDT MICHAEL H BLAU JUDITH 6507 MONTROSE AVE 334 W HYMAN AVE 3896 DOGWOOD LN BALTIMORE MD 21212 ASPEN CO 81611 DOYLESTOWN PA 18901 BRAFMAN STUART REVOCABLE TRUST BLONIARZ JOHN W & DONNA L BOOMERANG LTD BRAFMAN LOTTA BEA REVOCABLE 1839 N ORLEANS ST 500 W HOPKINS AVE TRUST CHICAGO IL 60614 ASPEN CO 81611 161 E CHICAGO #30B CHICAGO IL 60611 BROWDE DAVID A CHAMBERS PETE CHAPMAN JOAN M 176 BROADWAY PO BOX 10086 55-435 TANGLEWOOD NEW YORK NY 10038 MCLEAN VA 22106 LA QUINTA CA 92253 CITY OF ASPEN CLEARY THOMAS P REV LIVING TRUST CLICK JANE 130 S GALENA ST 70 N STEVENS ST 333 W MAIN ST ASPEN CO 81611 RHINELANDER WI 54501 ASPEN CO 81611 10 MOUNTAIN NEWS MEDIA CONDER CANDIDA E CONNER WILLIAM E II LIVING TRUST LE EAGLE CT 19816 GRAND VIEW DR 264 VILLAGE BLVD STE 104 Ftâ€¢OnVIL NV 89511 TOPANGA CA 90290-3314 INCLINE VILLAGE NV 89451 CRUSIUS FRANKLIN G CRETE ASSOCIATES LP CROWLEY SUE MITCHELL CRUSIUS MARGARET J 3418 SANSON STREET 409 S GREENWOOD AVE 5855 MIDNIGHT PASS RD APT 507 PHILADELPHIA PA 19104 COLUMBIA MO 65203 SARASOTA FL 34242 DEREVENSKY PAULA DEROSE VINCENT FLECK KATHRYN 1128 GRAND AVE 1209 N 14TH AVE 27 N MOORE TOWER B GLENWOOD SPRINGS CO 81601 MELROSE PARK IL 60160 NEW YORK NY 10013 GOLD RANDAL S FRANKEL KATHY REVOCABLE TRUST GERBERG JORDAN V EPSTEIN GILBERT AND MOLLIE 444 N WELLS #303 PO BOX 907 PO BOX 9813 CHICAGO IL 60610 LAGUNA BEACH CA 92652 ASPEN CO 81612 HANSEN WERNER AND HARRIET ~ENBERG STEPHEN R & CHERYL J GRAMIGER HANS R WINTER ERNST & SON INC CO ~~HOPKINIS AVE 73925 RD ORDINGER WEG 12 ~ CO 81611 GRAND JUCTION CO 81505-9511 HAMBURG GERMANY 22609 HOPP ROSALIND JACOBY FAMILY LTD PARTNERSHIP HUGGIN H SCOrr HOPP CLEMENT A JR AS JOINT TENANTS CASPER J JACOBY III 205 S MILL ST #1 107 S WARBLER LN PO BOX 248 ASPEN CO 81611-1978 S SOTA FL 34236 ALTON IL 62002 JOHNSON STANFORD H 25% JOHNSTON FAMILY TRUST KARP MICHAEL PO BOX 4859 2018 PHALAROPE 3418 SANSOM ST ASPEN CO 81612 COSTA MESA CA 92626 PHILADELPHIA PA 19102 KEIM JAMES T KENDIG ROBERT E KASPAR THERESA DOSS PEITZ H QUINN JR KENDIG MARILYN SUE PO BOX 1637 17550 BAR X RD C/O ASPEN MANAGEMENT - 802 E ASPEN CO 81612 COLORADO SPRINGS CO 80908-1500 COOPER-#4 ASPEN CO 81611 MARTIN SCOTT M MARCUS RENEE A MARTEN RANDOLPH C/O PARAMOUNT PICTURES 432 W HOPKINS 129 MARTEN ST 5555 MELROSE AVE ASPEN CO 81611 MONDOVI WI 54755 HOLLYWOOD CA 90038 PEITZ H QUINN JR PATERSON CHARLES G PRICE DOUGLAS L AND VALERIE KEIM JAMES T 500 W HOPKINS 8611 MELWOOD RD 17550 BAR X RD ASPEN CO 81611 BETHESDA MD 20817 COLORADO SPRINGS CO 80908-1500 SAMIOS CAROLE DAVID ROSENTHAL DIANNE SAMIOS NICHOLAS A OODSIDE RD PO BOX 10043 P O BOX 867 ELKINS PARK PA 19027 ASPEN CO 81612-7311 WESTMINSTER MD 21158 SCOTT MARY HUGH SHEEHAN WILLIAM J AND SHERWIN JENNIFER EVE 47.9% C/O RUSSELL SCOTT III & CO LLC SHEEHAN NANCY E 7017 ARANDALE RD 38 SUNSET DR 10 GOLF VIEW LN BETHESDA MD 20817-4701 ENGLEWOOD CO 80110-4026 FRANKFORT IL 60423 SILVERSTEIN PHILIP SLOVITER DAVID SIMON LOUIS & EILEEN SILVERSTEIN ROSALYN SLOVITER ROSALIE 1576 CLOVERLY LN 25 KNOLLS CRESCENT 1358 ROBINHOOD RD RYDAL PA 19046 BRONX NY 10463 MEADOWBROOK PA 19046 STASPEN LIMITED PARTNERSHIP SWISS CHALET/KITZBUHEL SLOVITOR DAVID AND ELAINE C/O JOHN STATON PARTNERSHIP 1358 ROBIN HOOD RD 191 PEACHTREE STREET SUITE 4900 333 E DURANT AVE MEADOWBROOK PN 19046 ATLANTA GA 30303-1763 ASPEN CO 81611 TAD PROPERTIES LTD LLC TEMPKINS HARRY OPERTIES LTD LIABILITY CO TOWNE CENTRE PROPERTIES LLC TEMPKINS VIVIAN 9978 323 W MAIN ST #301 420 LINCOLN RD STE 258 CO 81612 ASPEN CO 81611 MIAMI BEACH FL 33139 .. THALBERG KATHARINE TORNARE RENE TWIN COASTS LTD 22' " MAIN ST 308 W HOPKINS AVE 110 WEST C ST STE 1901 CO 81611 ASPEN CO 81611 SAN DmGO CA 92101 YOUNG PAUL III 13355 NOEL RD LB 28 DALLAS TX 75240 MEMORANDUM TO: Aspen Historic Preservation Commission THRU: Julie Anne Woods, Community Development Director Joyce Ohlson, Deputy Planning Director THRU: Amy Guthrie, Historic Preservation Officer FROM: Christina Amato, Historical Preservation Intern RE: 419 E. Cooper - Minor Review, Public Hearing DATE: October 10,2001 SUMMARY: This non-historic structure is located within the Commercial Core Historic District. The applicant requests HPC approval to convert an existing window to a recessed, street-facing door with a more traditional awning and sign. The existing door would be converted to a window and all the tinted glass will be replaced with clear glass. APPLICANT: Jeff Gorsuch, store owner; represented by Alan Richman Planning Services and Tom Frye, Architect. LOCATION: 419 E. Cooper, Unit 101 and 201 Park Place Condominiums, City and Townsite of Aspen. ZONING: The property is zoned "CC, Commercial Core," with a historic district overlay. MINOR DEVELOPMENT No approval for any development in the "H " Historic Overlay District, or involving , historic landmarks shall be granted unless the Historic Preservation Commission finds that all ofthe following standards (Section 26.415.010.B.4) are met: a. The proposed development is compatible in general design, scale, site plan, massing and volume with designated historic structures located on the parcel and with development on adjacent parcels when the subject site is in an "H," Historic Overlay Districts or is adjacent to an historic landmark. For historic landmarks where proposed development would extend into front yard, side yard and rear yard setbacks, extend into the minimum distance between buildings on the lot, exceed the allowed floor area by up to five hundred (500) square feet, or exceed the allowed site coverage by up to five (5) percent, the Historic Preservation Commission may grant necessary variances after 1 P39 making a finding that such variation is more compatible in character with the historic landmark and the neighborhood than would be development in accord with dimensional requirements. In no event shall variations pursuant to this Section exceed those variations allowed under Section 26.520.040(B)(2), for detached accessory dwelling units. Response: The existing building will remain essentially unchanged. The current doorway space will be replaced with a window of the same dimension. The existing window and awning will be replaced with double doors of the same dimension and a new awning. The proposed changes exemplify the traditional Victorian style of the Historic district with a recessed, street-facing entry way, kickplates below the windows, clear glass to replace the current tinted glass, a rectangular awning and a basic metal hanging sign above the entry way. Note that the owner submitted an alternate design for the door and awning which they prefer. The proposal is more compatible with the character of the district and Cooper Street than the current fa*ade, and therefore is recommended for approval. b. The proposed development reflects and is consistent with the character of the neighborhood of the parcel proposed for development. Response: The proposed changes are consistent with the character of the neighborhood, and replacing the current fa*ade with the proposed one is an improvement. c. The proposed development enhances or does not detract from the historic significance of designated historic structures located on the parcel proposed for development or adjacent parcels. Response: The proposal will not affect the significance of any designated structure. d. The proposed development enhances or does not diminish or detract from the architectural character and integrity of a designated historic structure or part thereof. Response: The proposal will not impact the architectural integrity of any designated structure. ALTERNATIVES: The HPC may consider any ofthe following alternatives: â€¢ Approve the application as submitted. â€¢ Approve the application with conditions to be met prior to issuance of a building peimit. 2 P40 â€¢ Table action to allow the applicant further time for restudy. (Specific 0 recommendations should be offered.) â€¢ Deny approval finding that the application does not meet the Development Review Standards. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that HPC approve the minor development application for 419 E. Cooper as proposed. RECOMMENDED MOTION: "I move to adopt Resolution # , Series of 2001, finding that the review standards have been met." Exhibits: Resolution # , Series of 2001 A. Staff memo dated October 10, 2001. B. Application. 0 0 3 P41 RESOLUTION OF THE ASPEN HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION APPROVING AN APPLICATION FOR MINOR DEVELOPMENT LOCATED 0 AT 419 E COOPER, UNITS 101 AND 201, PARK PLACE CONDOMINIUMS, CITY AND TOWNSITE OF ASPEN, COLORADO RESOLUTION NO. , SERIES OF 2001 WHEREAS, the applicant, Jeff Gorsuch, has requested minor development approval for the property located at 419 E. Cooper, Units 101 and 201, Park Place Condominiums, City and Townsite of Aspen. The property is located in the Commercial Core Historic District; and WHEREAS, all development in an "H," Historic Overlay District or development involving a historic landmark must meet all four Development Review Standards of Section 26.72.010(D) of the Aspen Land Use Code in order for IzIPC to grant approval, namely: 1. Standard: The proposed development is compatible in general design, massing and volume, scale and site plan with designated historic structures located on the parcel and with development on adjacent parcels when the subject site is in a "H," Historic Overlay District or is adjacent to an Historic Landmark. 2. Standard: The proposed development reflects and is consistent with the ~ character of the neighborhood of the parcel proposed for development. 3. Standard: The proposed development enhances or does not detract from the historic significance of designated historic structures located on the parcel proposed for development or on adjacent parcels. 4. Standard: The proposed development enhances or does not diminish from the architectural character or integrity of a designated historic structure or part thereof; and WHEREAS, Christina Amato, in her staffreport dated October 10, 2001, performed an analysis of the application based on the standards, and recommended approval of the project; and WHEREAS, at their regular meeting of October 10, 2001, the Historic Preservation Commission considered the application, found the application to meet the standards, and approved the application by a vote of to 0 P42 NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED: That minor development for 419 E. Cooper, units 101 and 201, Park Place Condominiums, City and Townsite of Aspen, be approved as proposed. APPROVED BY THE COMMISSION at its regular meeting on the 10th day of October, 2001. Approved as to Form: David Hoefer, Assistant City Attorney Approved as to content: HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION Suzannah Reid, Chair ATTEST: Kathy Strickland, Chief Deputy Clerk h P43 ... 1 1 \ . I V A 11./.i h 1,1 \11 3 /1) Â·. . u_~~~4 41 1.11 . PULL ~--ull *\f A 1/-4- W . i %1 \JO Oob /L-2231-1 & F 2% AM e nk- c 64 11 $ ' - - 1 )11,:-'- - < :-* . ~F- OCT, 1. 2001 10:10AM GORSUCH LTD VAIL . NO, 0038 P, 1 - TO:NELLS & AMS.U Std .-I 2 1 L.X. 5 -I 1â€¢ O ' 10 2 VÂ¢ 1 U #U 1 11' Â¥ 2 I - 3 3 2 .94 56 3 + >- 4 -C ul S 4 - - CO,~0 NA,tv Allt ... GORSUCH 26 - - HETAL AAHâ‚¬_ - -AÂ»h.5 2~014. Ce *12,1 </cÂ£14 1, 4 , 4Â· -.-I--- . Â»4 *i fiat . E.1 C (47-( &9 5 1 2,..., 6 0 Le / *F-21 Vo 9- 6-D MA&Â£ 0-1- "-'fc- C 4 ga_ +te'Â»142 L.C- OCT, 1. 2001 10:10AM GORSUCH LTD VAIL NO. 0038 --P. - 9fd Li,0 Oteigho<3 8#1*1'I[1111,1~ 'fRESKN*FliANI~ f.901$$0" MEETING DATE: ID lic>(01 NAME OF PROJECT: 4 1 1 E 63 0 Pria_ CLERÂ¥3--tiv-2 0 /yl viv STAFF: v V- v WITNESSES: (1) 3260 60Â£95 6,1-C~67 0 (2) .-TE rn Fri 1 0â‚¬0 (3) (4) (5) EXHIBITS: 1 Staff Report 04 (Check If Applicable) 2 Affidavit of Notice ( D.Â·*j~ck If Applicable) 3 Board Criteria Sheet ( ) (Check If Applicable) ~701>~L.- 4 MOTIONt UJIL titot j\Â»Â£0 122Â»4Â»l - W~ .U-- A a 2444 0 4 3 VOTE: YES _~5 NO ~ SUZANNAH REID YES ~pu .MEMN/Elte,emee=Â¥ES=~_Nn.-.-=..I NEILL HIRST YES l/NO GILBERT SANCHEZ YES t/NO LISA MARKALUNAS YES l'/ NO JEFFREY HALFERTY YES 64- RALLY DUPPS YES V' NO TERESrMEImCm>Â¥ES====Ne===~ YES NO YES NO HPCVOTE County of Pitkin } AFFIDAVIT OF NOTICE PURSUANT } SS. TO ASPEN LAND USE REGULATIONS State of Colorado } SECTION 26.304.060(E) I, ~XLA. 0-~clÂ»p',~ , being or representing an Applicant to the City of Aspen, personally certify that I have complied with the public notice requirements pursuant to Section 26.304.060(E) of the Aspen Municipal Code in the following manner: 1. By mailing of notice, a copy oft*bich is at*Ned hereto, by first-class postage prepaid U.S. Mail to all owners of property within three bhh*ed (300) feet of the subject property, as indicated / N on the attached list, on the day of/ 3222- (which is days prior to the public hearing date of . 1 - 2 1 By posting a sign in a conspicuous place on the subject property (as it could be seen from the nearest public way) and that the said sign was posted and visible continuously from the 1 -1 day ~ of <SeqUA- , 2001. to the -11 day of GA-o\,a , 200_1_. (Must be posted for at least ten (10) full days before the hearing date). A photograph of the posted sign is attached hereto. 1.-7 L I 0 i U.Â«/ I . PUBLIC NOTICE / 1 Â· signature 41 74-A 210â‚¬ - DA-ELLIDO Signed before me this 28day of â‚¬0*'Al.~ , TIhid_lCCEM 200L. by ASPENC\TY HALL PLACE11Â£L-GALEw PURPOSELE 74 6 n 'R,11 M. A -1=i==ILLUMMILMI- .LULLI.ubLILL =L,LRUIMEk.Ablt= WITNESS MY HAND AND OFFICIAL SEAL 161- My Commissiorl.Ext#rÂ®j,4/ / My Commission expires: 5[712Â®i.>* M' vv Ob .'4 /4.Â·-Gittt = < Notary Public~- 0294<.~~~ ~ %42337 MEMORANDUM TO: Aspen Historic Preservation Commission THRU: Julie Anne Woods, Community Development Director Joyce Ohlson, Deputy Planning Director THRU: Amy Guthrie, Historic Preservation Officer FROM: Christina Amato, Historic Preservation Intern RE: 411 E. Hyman- Minor Review, Public Hearing DATE: October 10, 2001 SUMMARY: This non-historic structure is located within the Commercial Core Historic District. The applicant requests HPC approval to enlarge the storefront by adding hopper windows to the bottom of the existing window, to replace the glass in the existing window and replace the door entry and awning with newer materials of the same design. APPLICANT: Pretzel Maker / TCBY tenants; represented by, Jeffrey Halferty Design. LOCATION: 411 E. Hyman, the west 16' of Lot C, Block 89, City and Townsite of Aspen. ZONING: The property is zoned "CC, Commercial Core," with a historic district overlay. MINOR DEVELOPMENT No approval for any development in the "H," Historic Overlay District, or involving historic landmarks shall be granted unless the Historic Preservation Commission finds that all ofthe following standards (Section 26.415.010.B.4) are met: a. The proposed development is compatible in general design, scale, site plan, massing and volume with designated historic structures located on the parcel and with development on adjacent parcels when the subject site is in an "H," Historic Overlay District, or is adjacent to an historic landmark. For historic landmarks where proposed development would extend into front yard, side yard and rear yard setbacks, extend into the minimum distance between buildings on the lot, exceed the allowed floor area by up to five hundred (500) square feet, or exceed the allowed site coverage by up to five (5) percent, the Historic Preservation Commission may grant necessary variances after 1 P47 making a finding that such variation is more compatible in character with the historic landmark and the neighborhood than would be development in 0 accord with dimensional requirements. In no event shall variations pursuant to this Section exceed those variations allowed under Section 26.520.040(B)(2), for detached accessory dwelling units. Response: The existing building will remain essentially unchanged. The existing window, door and awning will be replaced with similar materials with no design change. The window space will be enlarged to accommodate hopper windows below the fixed window, for the purpose of ventilation. Although not an exact interpretation of the 19th century storefront, the additional windows will create a large storefront window, which is typical of the historic Victorian commercial buildings of the district, and is therefore recommended for approval. b. The proposed development reflects and is consistent with the character of the neighborhood of the parcel proposed for development Response: The proposed changes are consistent with the character of the neighborhood, and would only enhance it. c. The proposed development enhances or does not detract from the historic significance of designated historic structures located on the parcel proposed for development or adjacent parcels. Response: The proposal will not affect the significance of any designated structure. 0 d. The proposed development enhances or does not diminish or detract from the architectural character and integrily of a designated historic structure or part thereof. Response: The proposal will not impact the architectural integrity of any designated structure. ALTERNATIVES: The HPC may consider any of the following alternatives: â€¢ Approve the application as submitted. â€¢ Approve the application with conditions to be met prior to issuance of a building pennit. â€¢ Table action to allow the applicant further time for restudy. (Specific recommendations should be offered.) â€¢ Deny approval finding that the application does not meet the Development Review Standards. 0 2 P48 RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that HPC approve the minor development application for 411 E. Hyman as proposed. RECOMMENDED MOTION: "I move to adopt Resolution # , Series of 2001, finding that the review standards and the design guidelines have been met." Exhibits: Resolution # , Series of 2001 A. Staffmemo dated October 10, 2001. B. Application. 3 P49 RESOLUTION OF THE ASPEN HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION APPROVING AN APPLICATION FOR MINOR DEVELOPMENT LOCATED 0 AT 411 E HYMAN, THE WEST 16' OF LOT C, BLOCK 89, CITY AND TOWNSITE OF ASPEN, COLORADO RESOLUTION NO. , SERIES OF 2001 WHEREAS, the applicant, Pretzel Maker / TCBY, represented by Jeffrey Halferty Design, has requested minor development approval for the property located at 411 E. Hyman, the west 16' of Lot C, Block 89, City and Townsite of Aspen. The property is located in the Commercial Core Historic District; and WHEREAS, all development in an "H," Historic Overlay District or development involving a historic landmark must meet all four Development Review Standards of Section 26.72.010(D) of the Aspen Land Use Code in order for HPC to grant approval, namely: 1. Standard: The proposed development is compatible in general design, massing and volume, scale and site plan with designated historic structures located on the parcel and with development on adjacent parcels when the subject site is in a "H," Historic Overlay District or is adjacent to an Historic Landmark. 2. Standard: The proposed development reflects and is consistent with the ~ character of the neighborhood of the parcel proposed for development. 3. Standard: The proposed development enhances or does not detract from the historic significance of designated historic structures located on the parcel proposed for development or on adjacent parcels. 4. Standard: The proposed development enhances or does not diminish from the architectural character or integrity of a designated historic structure or part thereof; and WHEREAS, Christina Amato, in her staff report dated October 10, 2001, performed an analysis of the application based on the standards, and recommended approval of the project; and WHEREAS, at their regular meeting of October 10, 2001, the Historic Preservation Commission considered the application, found the application to meet the standards, and approved the application by a vote of to NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED: 0 P50 0 That minor development for 411 E. HYMAN, the west 16' of Lot , Block 89, City and Townsite of Aspen, be approved as proposed. APPROVED BY THE COMMISSION at its regular meeting on the 10th day of October, 2001. Approved as to Form: David Hoefer, Assistant City Attorney Approved as to content: HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION Suzannah Reid, Chair ATTEST: 0 Kathy Strickland, Chief Deputy Clerk 0 P51 jeffrey halferty design 215 S Monarch St. suite 202 Aspen, Colorado 81611 (970) 920-4535 (970) 925-6035 Fax Memo DATE: 10/1/01 TO: Community Development Department Historic Preservation Commission Attn: Amy Guthrie FROM: Jeffrey RE: Pretzel Maker / TCBY 411 E. Hyman HPC Minor Development review Aspen Amy, We have been working with Frank Chiavone to help with the design and development for his retail conversion at 411 E. Hyman. We are requesting permission to enlarge the storefront glass on the North wall. The suggestions from the H.P.C.'s work session deemed helpful and informative. 1. The proposed development is compatible in general design scale, site plan massing and volume with designated historic structures located on the parcel and will be subordinate to the main massing of the structure. 2. The proposed development is consistent and reflects the character of the neighborhood of the parcel proposed for development and will be a welcomed element to the commercial core. 3. The proposed development enhances and does not detract from the historic structures located on the parcel proposed for development or adjacent parceIs; and will be compatible to the existing to the neighborhood. 4. The proposed development enhances and does not diminish or detract from the architectural character and integrity of a designated historic structure of part thereof. P52 ' ATTACHMENT 1 LAND USE APPLICATION FORM 1. Project name PR-el-ze I h/\a Kâ‚¬rt 2. Project location 4 1\ 12 Ff-Hvnon 3 (0(YWrl-CRc 1-64 I COR,-C_ (indicate street address, lot and block number or metes and bounds description) 3. Present zoning 00 4. Lot size 5. Applicant's name, address and phone number Exia 1/3 k 6. Representatives name, ddress, and phone number 32*na-/Frl-1 920 - 49Â®rE 7. Type of application (check ~11 that apply): Conditional Use Conceptual SPA Conceptual HPC Special Review Final SPA Final HPC 8040 Greenline Conceptual PUD Minor HPC Stream Margin Final PUD Relocation HPC 0 2 - Subdivision Text/Map Amend. Historic Landmark GMQS allotment GMQS exemption Demo/Partial Demo View Plane Condominiumization Design Review Lot SpliULot Line Appeal Committee Adjustment 8. Description of existing uses (number and type of existing structures, approximate sq. ft., number of bedrooms, any previous approvals granted to the property) PEâ€¢+/< 1 U 9. Descriptipn,of development application -122 'Pr/) puet> br nut 5-0 x Â¢-\91' 44, Ar)Â£244 . -Â¥0 8rjo AhÂ¢>25/ V,%9â‚¬_0, df .2/9< 409 re#A) 6. 10. Have you completed and attached the following? Attachment 1- Land use application form Attachment 2- Dimensional requirements form 0 - Response to Attachment 3 Response to Attachment 4 P53 r â€¢ 1 - T' i , ' i : ~ ' i Ii . . 1 * 1 1 lili 1 1 'iIi lili,111/1 ' 1,1 14,11 1 fli'111' 1 1 1 1 It 1 1 1 11 41i! 111 lili : lili 11 i , . 1 ]11111 1 j] . '1 2 ? 1 ' 1/i' '1- 1 --11 1 111! Itt 1 1 1 : 1 1 111 . â€¢1 11; 1 1 1 i 1 11 2 -lilli : 1 1 It!']- -111'111 Ill ) 3 11 ;11? 11Ii 51:lf : Er , i::': , 6 , i ' i 11 i j j, -:11, lili: lilli 1 1 1 1 1 liz 11,111 1 1 1 lili Ill!11_ 1 1 I i 1 11 ) 1 1 1-' I 1 1 1 1 1 - 1 1 1 1 1 1/ lili 1 1 1 1 -1 1 1 1 1 1 1 ) 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 - 1/11111111111lll/1&1 .1 1 ; 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 It 1,1 1 1 1,) 1 1.1 1 I. lilli 1.1-! /1 1 1 1 ; 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 li 0 . .b Â· 1,11111'111 /3- F(261*ANE 1- 1 n 1'.' IiI'':115 1111111111/1l /11111/11/(111 I1It1I1/III1Il 1,1/111/111'11{111'{11'lilli 1{1111,11111/1 1/111/1/1111{1 /1 I 1 It11 I 1 It!t 111/l 11111111/ 1111111Ilt1, \-ji/'~1 1 111111{111 lili/1/It/] . 'f111 t1I111, <-)NORTH ELEVATION 411 E. HYMAN. EXISTING 1/4,1 = 1 LOIl 0 P54 IROÂ®0-[10-t}r~ - ipea/-ki-~~ 1 Â°nÂ° j 0 - \ 1 . t- <~ 2 7'5\ 1 T 16, L N -1 0 -1~ 0 BLOCK 89 1 - | n Iii 1 - SCALE :1-= 50' 50 10 =l.-46 CONIPUR INTERTAZ â€ž 2 'FEET~~ - ---- I I ~1.-1- . m .1 1 i Â· n / /.- SITE PLAN MAP 411 EAST HYMAN Scale: 1" = 50'- 0"m . .- Â·Â·,rÂ· laÂ· ,:ae 5 1 -1 .33HS 01 1131YW 3003 1 1 11 !/'tt 1 , 1 1 11 -11 :! 11 711 .12 2 U &y &~ 't;1 {,1 1 ' 1 , 1 11 i , 1 , 1 ' 1 111:.11 1 ' 1 1 1 . 11 , -1, 1 1 ~ 1,1 /'il 1:1';tl ' 1 t ' , 11 1 1t ..11'11,1 '11: tl 1 1,1 11 1~ 1 1 11 1/1 1 # , 1 1 1 t It I 1 I i 1 1 1 1 Ill ; "L11 1 /1/' filt; I11I 1.,1,1/1 lili!111 >E~Aft INS EXEPN~ < - NEA POOR 1 I ---711-*8%8"MEN // r \ 8,4011 -- i tn lilli #lilli . 1 PRETZEL <<)NORTH ELEVATION 411 E. HYMAN. FACTORY PROPOSED 1/4" = 1Lon 0 P56 -0. r Â£.4. 1.1 ... ~99{Â«11- -119:~1]111]Wbidit, r ,1W1.21~kW,I~i.~17~ Ji~11~F rrivnni~0~1iltsm,fAI~11 011*INI*10* 11~ Ill**lkiltÂ¥/ = 111 W k ; WON"IN#*tugh" 0 MEETING DATE: 0411 LL ffÂ»Â« NAME OF PROJECT: R)] ie/Â© j CLERK: Ch STAFF: ~u,EÂ·Â©40,c.-0~~ WITNESSES: (1) Â»~-Â·x~l- -- (2) (3) (4) (5) EXHIBITS: 1 Staff Report (Lf' (Check If Applicable) 2 Affidavit of Notice C b.,-(C]~sk If Applicable) 3 Board Criteria Sheet ~ (Check If Applicable) 4 MOTION: Wk_, st \1 6 j #l-..:St/70' 0 1 R* he :, f)LE, F, U -A 1 29~ Ult 341 VOTE: YES ~ NO ~ SUZANNAH REID YES V'NO --M*6*NIE-ROSCHEQ_YER NQ _ SUSAN~aeg)EFTIOTUTTES~~- GILBERT SANCHEZ YES (y/NO- LISA MARKALUNAS YES ~ 9/' *KEREÂ¥-H*tiPE*TÂ¥-Â¥EL__NO, RALLY DUPPS YES ~NO - Wit/d,~ YE~4 _ YES NO YES NO 0 HPCVOTE . l i y.*1 -7 43 @r. ---fl TOMCA CONSTRUCI'ION "NC : W:=MtL :7:L~r~0 8ONOABLE .. .. AFFIDAVIT OF PUBLIC NOTICE REQUIRED BY SECTION 26.304.060 (E), ASPEN LAND USE CODE ADDRESS OF PROPERTY: 4\\ -147** , Aspen, CO SCHEDULED PUBLIC HEARING DATE: b UK NO , 2001 STATE OF COLORADO ) ) SS. County of Pitkin ) I, 30Â¥0*V ~4~yportu~ (name, please print) being or represe~ing an Ahplicant tel the City of Aspen, Colorado, hereby personally certi fy that I have complied with the Dublic notice requirements of Section 26.304.060 (E) of the Aspen Land Use Code in the following manner: Publication of notice: By the publication in the legal notice section of an official paper or a paper of general circulation in the City of Aspen at least fifteen (15) days prior to the public hearing. A copy of the publicationis attached hereto. l~osting of notice: By posting of notice, which form was obtained from the Community Development Department, which was made of suitable, waterproof materials, which was not less than twenty-two (22) inches wide and twenty-six (26) inches high, and which was composed of letters not less than one inch in height. Said notice was posted at least ten (10) days prior to the public hearing and was continuously visible from the 01 day of 681?lt,kbor , 2001 , to and including the date and time of the public heartng. A photograph of the posted notice (sign) is attached hereto. Mailing of notice. By the mailing of a notice obtained from the Community Development Department, which contains the information described in Section 26.304.060(E)(2) of the Aspen Land Use Code. At least ten ( 10) days prior to the public hearing, notice was hand delivered or mailed by first class, postage prepaid U.S. mail to all owners of property within three hundred (300) feet ofthe property subject to the development application, and, at least fifteen (15) days prior to the public hearing, notice was hand delivered or mailed by first class postage prepaid U.S. mail to any federal agency, state, county, municipal government, school, service district or other governmental or quasi-governmental agency that owns property within three hundred (300) feet of the property subject to the development application. The names and addresses of property owners shall be those on the current tax records of Pitkin County as they appeared no more than sixty (60) days prior to the date of the public hearing. A copy ofthe owners and governmental agencies so noticed is attached hereto. Rontinued on next page) 1 0 & loi M fl 4 4 Rezoning or text amendment. Whenever the official zoning district map is in any way to be changed or amended incidental to or as part of a general revision ofthis Title, or whenever the text ofthis Title is to be amended, whether such revision be made by repeal ofthis Title and enactment ofa new land use regulation, or otherwise, the requirement of an accurate survey map or other sufficient legal description of, and the notice to and listing of names and addresses of owners of real property in the area of the proposed change shall be waived. However, the proposed zoning map has been available for public inspection in the planning agency during all business hours for fifteen (15) days prior to the public hearing on such amendments. A-Â» AL- Sifafe The foregaing "Affidavit of Notice" was *knoimedged before me this .~~'I~-' y of &46.4- , 200-6 by jIT~ HTA EQ+4-11 WITNESS MY HAND AND OFFICIAL SEAL , 24(&2 \6~ My commission expires: 4/ 1 2/03 "' / 0 /*U,ICAL> 84//EL-1~ /0 # x~~ ~lotary Public ATTACHMENTS: COPY OF THE PUBLICATION PHOTOGRAPH OF THE POSTED NOTICE (SIGN) LIST OFTHE OWNERS AND GOVERNMENTAL AGENCIES NOTICED BY MAIL â‚¬3