HomeMy WebLinkAboutFile Documents.210 S 1st St.0281.2017 (26).ARBK Sufficiency Checklist
THE CITY OF ASPEN CITY OF ASPEN ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT
SUFFICIENCY REVIEW REQUIREMENTS
If the project will increase impervious area (this includes adding hard surface patios, increasing the
footprint of the house, etc.), disturb>200SF of land (this includes grading, even if a structure or hard
surface is not added,as well as impervious are that is"scraped and replaced"), or add or repair snowmelt
then an engineering review will be required as part of the Building Permit Application review process.
All permit applications that must receive an engineering review are required to schedule and participate
in a Pre-Application Meeting with the Development Engineer. The sufficiency checklist below and any
necessary supporting documents should be completed prior to this meeting, as they will be reviewed
during the meeting. The Development Engineer's signature on this checklist is required in order to
submit a Building Permit Application.
Project Address: 210 SOUTH FIRST ST. ASPEN RESIDENCE
Project Name: KEY RESIDENCE
Parcel ID Number: 2735-124-59-1 12
Owner and Phone Number: 135 HOPKINS LTD. 512-263-9478
Contact, Phone Number, and E-mail Address: GRETCHEN GREENWOOD 970948-2081
ggreenwood@ggaaspen.com
The following information is required for the engineer's review. Please indicate if these documents
have been completed and are attached. If any of these documents are not applicable, please provide an
explanation in the space provided.
1. How much area will be disturbed by the proposed improvements? C. pcilacres 1/ /(- sq.ft.
(,'0 % of site % % of existing structure(s) (Note: If<200 SF,skip to#10)
If one acre or more is disturbed, a CDPHE Construction General Permit is required
Yes,Notice of Coverage has been included in the CMP.
S. No, A statement that Notice of Coverage is not required is included in the CMP.
2. What type of project is this—Minor or Major?
The project is considered "Minor" if 200— 1000 sq.ft. of the site is disturbed and "Major" if > 1000
sq.ft. of the site is disturbed.
3. Is the project located within a stream margin, floodplain,mudflow hazard area,or 8040
Greenline review area? (state area(s)) N 0
Projects, including"Minor", located in the stream margin review area, 8040 Greenline review area,
mudflow analysis area, or in jurisdictional or non jurisdictional floodplains may be required to do a
more detailed drainage analysis and design.
4. If disturbance exceeds 1000 sq. ft.,do you plan to detain storm events on site? >YES NO
There is an option to pay a fee in lieu of providing detention on site. Discuss with the Development
Engineer.
RECEIVED
Revised 12-07-I 110/0 9/18
ASPEN
BUILDING DEPARTMENT
Included N/A,.
5. Minor Grading and Drainage Report and Plan
(200 SF <Disturbance < 1000 SF) L—I
6. Major Grading and Drainage Report and Plan
(Disturbance> 1000 SF)
7. Compliant City of Aspen SurveyLI
❑
(Disturbance> 1000 SF)
8. Soils Report
(Disturbance> 1000 SF)
9. Excavation Stabilization Plan
(Nearby Trees, Structures, or Travel Ways. See 1.3.11 URMP)
10. Construction Management Plan (CMP)
(If< 1,000 s.f. (exterior) and/or<400 s.f. (interior))
11. Public Improvement Requirements
(Area designated within adopted sidewalk, curb and gutter plan and as
deemed necessary by the City Engineer)
12. Floodplain Development Requirements
(If working within a 100-yr floodplain as determined by FIRM, June 4,
1987)
13. Mudflow Analysis
(Slopes> 15%, in mudflow plain, as deemed applicable by City Engineer)
I hereby declare the engineering information submitted in this sufficiency review for this project is
sufficient for City of Aspen Building Permit Application submittal.
Applicant's Signature Date
City of Aspen Development Engineer's Signature Date
RECEIVED
Revised 12-07-11 10/0 9/18
ASPEN
BUILDING DEPARTMENT