Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutFile Documents.743 Cemetery Ln.0011.2018 (37).ARBK Sufficiency Checklist 411-C THE CITY or ASPEN CITY OF ASPEN ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT SUFFICIENCY REVIEW REQUIREMENTS If the project will increase impervious area(this includes adding hard surface patios, increasing the footprint of the house, etc.), disturb>200SF of land (this includes grading, even if a structure or hard surface is not added, as well as impervious are that is"scraped and replaced"), or add or repair snowmelt then an engineering review will be required as part of the Building Permit Application review process. All permit applications that must receive an engineering review are required to schedule and participate in a Pre-Application Meeting with the Development Engineer. The sufficiency checklist below and any necessary supporting documents should be completed prior to this meeting, as they will be reviewed during the meeting. The Development Engineer's signature on this checklist is required in order to submit a Building Permit Application. Project Address: 743-745 Cemetery Lane Aspen, Colorado 81611 Project Name: 743-745 Duplex Parcel ID Number: 743 Cemetery Lane: 2735-122-26-001 745Cemetery Lane: 2735-122-26-002 Owner and Phone Number: 743:Ilughes Family Trust:480-273-6200/745:777Club LLC:970-948-7710 Contact, Phone Number, and E-mail Address: Gretchen Greenwood 948-2081/ggreenwood@ggaaspen.com The following information is required for the engineer's review. Please indicate if these documents have been completed and are attached. If any of these documents are not applicable,please provide an explanation in the space provided. 1. how much area will be disturbed by the proposed improvements? _' acres sq.ft. % of site %of existing structure(s) (Note: If<200 SF,skip to#10) If one acre or more is disturbed, a CDPI-IE Construction General Permit is required Yes,Notice of Coverage has been included in the CMP. No, A statement that Notice of Coverage is not required is included in the CMP. 2. What type of project is this—Minor or Major? - " The project is considered "Minor" if 200— 1000 sq.ft. of the site is disturbed and "Major" if > 1000 sq.ft. of the site is disturbed. 3. Is the project located within a stream margin,floodplain, mudflow hazard area,or 8040 Greenline review area? (state area(s)) ; Projects, including"Minor", located in the stream margin review area, 8040 Greenline review area, mudflow analysis area, or in jurisdictional or non jurisdictional fioodplains may be required to do a more detailed drainage analysis and design. 4. If disturbance exceeds 1000 sq.ft.,do you plan to detain storm events on site? YES NO There is an option to pay a fee in lieu of providing detention on site. Discuss with the Development Engineer. Revised 12-0 1 4/ (J O1/11/2018 ASPEN BUILDING DEPARTMENT Included N/A 5. Minor Grading and Drainage Report and Plan IA (200 SF<Disturbance< 1000 SF) 6. Major Grading and Drainage Report and Plan 1K (Disturbance> 1000 SF) 7. Compliant City of Aspen Survey (Disturbance> 1000 SF) 8. Soils Report N(Disturbance> 1000 SF) 9. Excavation Stabilization Plan (Nearby Trees, Structures, or Travel Ways. See 1.3.11 URMP) 10. Construction Management Nan (CMP) �,{� (If< 1,000 s.f. (exterior) and/or<400 s.f. (interior)) t/�[ 11.Public Improvement Requirements (Area designated within adopted sidewalk, curb and gutter plan and as deemed necessary by the City Engineer) 12. Floodplain Development Requirements CX1 (If working within a 100-yr floodplain as determined by FIRM,June 4, 1987) 13. Mudflow Analysis Ell (Slopes> 15%, in mudflow plain,as deemed applicable by City Engineer) I hereby declare the engineering information submitted in this sufficiency review for this project is sufficient for City of Asp uildi Permit Application submittal. Ap is Signature tCldten I?tll 'tie' ' Date City of Aspen Development Engineer's Signature Date Revised I7-07- , REr,,EIVED 01/11/2018 ASPEN BUILDING DEPARTMENT