Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutFile Documents.34 Westview Dr.0056.2018 (24).ARBK r r/ t ' _160.0 conundrum technologies Performance & Financial Analysis 8.46 kW SunPower Solar PV System Prepared March 2, 2018 for Joseph Spears S2 Architects 215 S. Monarch St. , G-102 Aspen, CO 81611 Phone:970-379-2670 Email: bdm@sopris.net Work Location: 34 Westview Dr. Aspen, CO 81611 Prepared by Jason Perez Phone:303-573-6300 I Email:jsperez@conundrumtechnologies.com . 03/22/2018 ASPEN BUILDING DEPARTMENT t�l conundrum technologies' Executive Summary 8.46 kW SunPower Solar PV System Electric Utility Savings: Anticipate a savings of approximately$1,959 in electric bills(63%)at current utility rates in the first year. Savings will grow as electric utility rates are expected to rise 3.78%a year. The purchase of electric energy(kWh)from your utility is expected to be reduced by 63%. Over 25 years, annual utility savings are anticipated to average$3,161, for a total utility savings of$79,013. Performance Summary Solar Electric(PV) System: 8.64 kW DC (8.294 kW AC) producing 15,073 kWh/Year. Purchase Price& Net Cost Financial Ratios Contract Price: $43,000 Customer's Profitability Index: 1.1 Incentives to Customer: ($12,9001 Cashflow Payback: 16.5 years Net Purchase Cost: $30,100 Internal Rate of Return (IRR): 5.6% Modified IRR(MIRK): 6.8% Net Present Value (NPV): $1,985 Cash Gained over Life: $32,904 • Property Value Appreciation:$40,660 (first-year utility savings x 20 years) • CO2 Saved over System Life:309 tons. Equivalent to driving 618,000 auto miles Finance: Cash Cumulative Cash Flow $40,000- $30,000- $20,000- $10,000-$o _ . . II I III II1 '-1-1 11 . I I ($20,000) ($30,000)- ($40,000) 0 5 10 15 20 25 Year RECEIVED 03/22/2018 Page 2 of 15 Joseph Spears-March 2,2018 (JobID: 1400025956) ASPEN BUILDING DEPARTMENT t l conundrum technologies The Cost of Doing Nothing Utility Cost over Time $130,921 Total Do-Nothing Cost $51,903 Total After Project $9,000- ■ If you Do Nothing • After Project • Utility Savings $8,000— $7,000— $6,000— $5,000— $4,000— • $3,000 $2,000 —+—�—~— — — — — $1,000 $0 I 5 10 15 20 25 Year Your Hedge Against Utility Inflation:Your investment in this project will protect you from utility rate inflation. Utility Cost by Month Utility Cost by Month (typical): Reduced 63% $300-1• If you Do Nothing • After Project $280 $260_ $240 $220 $200 $180 $160- $140- $120- $100- $80- $60- $40- $20- $0 Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Month RECEIVED 03/22/2018 Page 3 of 15 Joseph Spears-March 2,2018 (JobID: 1400025956) ASPEN BUILDING DEPARTMENT re, conundrum technologies' Levelized Energy Cost (LEC) Your Hedge Against Utility Inflation:Your investment in this project will protect you from utility rate inflation. Levelized Energy Cost(LEC)analysis provides us with a"hurdle rate" (the levelized energy cost)which can be compared to the expected change in utility rates(by way of utility rate inflation). LEC is the average lifetime cost of energy produced by a particular system.We can compare the LEC to the current utility rate and its expected change in price as time goes on. In this manner one can judge the investment as a"better bet"than utility rates to contain energy costs. Represented below is the average cost of utility energy versus the cost of energy produced (LEC) by your system over time. Electric: Levelized Energy Cost (LEC) $/kWh: Utility vs. System Levelized Energy Cost (LEC) $0.55= —Utility Cost: $0.13(inflated 3.78%per year) $0.50- Solar Electric(PV)LEC: $0.17 $0.45- $0.40 $0.35- $0.30 $0.25- $0.20 $0.15 $0.10- $0.05- $0.000 5 10 15 20 25 Year RECF1VED 03/22/2018 Page 4 of 15 Joseph Spears-March 2,2018 (JobID: 1400025956) ASPEN BUILDING DEPARTMENT lconundrum technologies Carbon Footprint Your carbon footprint will be reduced. Over the life of your system 309 tons of carbon dioxide(CO2)will be eliminated from your footprint. Equivalent to: Planting 7,200 trees. dint.* °. Driving reduced by 618,000 auto miles,or 31,518 gallons of gasoline. r . Recycling 976 tons of waste instead of sending it to landfill. • IN NIP 301,096 pounds(150.5 tons)of coal burned. and you will help avoid the use of up to 7,536,500 gallons of water by Thermoelectric Powerplants. 1 ,t. 03/22/2018 Page 5 of 15 Joseph Spears-March 2,2018 (JobID: 1400025956) ASPEN BUILDING DEPARTMENT t l conundrum technologies Solar Electric (PV) System Summary Solar Electric (PV) kWh Production by Month (typical) 2,400 ❑ Energy Use • Energy Production 2,200- 2,000- 1,800- — 1,600- 1,400- 1,200- 1, - 800000- 600 400- 200- 0 Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Month Tilt:30° Azimuth: 180° 3"Air Gap Shade reduces production:0% PV Panels: 24 x SunPower, Model: SPR-X22-360-C-AC Inverters: 24 x SunPower, Model: SPR-X22-360-D-AC (240 Vac) Total Panel Area: 421 sq-ft System Peak Power: 8.64 kW DC(8.294 kW AC, 7.705 kW CEC) Annual Production: 15,073 kWh. Supplying 63%of annual electric use Contract Price Summary: Solar Electric(PV)System Contract Amount: $43,000 ($4.98 per watt DC) Incentives available to Customer in 1st Year Federal Tax Credit(30%of Gross Cost at Installation): ($12,900) Net Cost at Install (after incentives): $30,100 Net Installed Price per Watt: $3.48 per watt DC ($3.63 per watt AC) RECEIVED 03/22/2018 Page 6 of 15 Joseph Spears-March 2,2018 (JobID: 1400025956) ASPEN BUILDING DEPARTMENT t l conundrum technologies Sensitivity Analysis: Utility Rate Inflation Scenarios Sensitivity Analysis is a process of analyzing possible future events by considering alternative possible outcomes. The average change in utility rates(inflation)over the system life is perhaps the variable which may most affect the return on your investment. The following table summarizes how utility rate inflation may impact your investment. The project, as quoted, is compared to utility rate inflation that averages-5%, 0%and +5%over the system life. As Quoted -5%Inflation 0%Inflation +5%Inflation Total Utility Savings: $79,013 $26,188 $47,336 $94,203 Cash Gained over Life: $32,904 none $1,227 $48,094 Return on Initial Cash Invested(IRR): 5.6% 0% 0.4% 7.2% Wealth Created Over System Life(NPV): $1,985 ($22,156) ($12,017) $8,440 Utility Inflation,as Quoted: Electric Rates:3.78% / to 03/22/2018 Page 7 of 15 Joseph Spears-March 2,2018 (JobID: 1400025956) ASPEN BUILDING DEPARTMENT lconundrum technologies How to Interpret Financial Ratios and Measures A Measure of Security:Cashflow Payback: 16.5 years-16.5 years(modified) The most common measure of the security of a proposed investment is its payback,defined as the length of time until one gets one's money back. Cashflow Payback is when cumulative cash flow stays positive for good. Modified Cashflow Payback is when the cumulative cash in-flows exceed the total of all cash out-flows over the system life;future maintenance expenses are accommodated. Profitability Index: 1.1 What PI Means: Generally, if PI>1 then accept the project. If PI<1 then "qualitative"factors may justify the project. Profitability Index(PI)is a measure of investment efficiency. It identifies the relationship of investment to its return. Profitability Index(PI) is calculated as: (Net-Present Value of the Returns plus the Initial Investment)divided by the Initial Investment. For example:$30,100 is invested and the NPV of the returns is$1,985,then the PI =($30,100+$1,985)/$30,100= 1.1, or more generically,for every$1 invested you received$1.1 in return. Net Present Value(NPV):$1,985. What NPV Means: NPV is an indicator of how much value (wealth)an investment adds to the customer. If NPV is positive then the investment would add value. If NPV is zero or negative then other"qualitative"factors may be of adequate value to justify the project(for example, lengthening a swimming pool season). Net Present Value(NPV)is one way to account for the time value of money. NPV calculates the current value of each future cash flow. For example, $1.00 received two years from now is equivalent to something less today, if it can be invested now at some interest rate. This allows us to"discount"the cash flows(whether positive or negative)that the proposed investment is expected to generate at various times in the future back to their equivalent value today(that is, their"present value"). If one then subtracts the cost of the proposed investment from the sum of the present values of the ongoing cash inflows, one obtains the net present value(NPV)of the investment. Internal Rate of Return(IRR):5.6% Internal Rate of Return(IRR)is a common measure of investment efficiency. Equivalent to the yield to maturity of a bond.The internal rate of return (IRR) is the annualized effective compounded rate of return earned on the invested capital. 8.0% —Projects Internal Rate of Return(IRR) 7.0% —Corporate Bond Yields(AAA Rated) 6.0% —U.S.Treasury Bill Yield(20-year) 5.0%- 4.0% 3.0%- 1.0%- 0.0% 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 Modified Internal Rate of Return (MIRR):6.8%-- Modified Internal Rate of Return(MIRR), as the name implies, is a modification of the internal rate of return (IRR) and as such aims to resolve some problems with the IRR. First, IRR assumes that positive cash flows are reinvested at the same rate of return as that of the project that generated them. A more likely situation is that the funds will be reinvested at a rate closer to the cost of capital. For determining MIRR,we assumed a finance rate of 5.00%and a reinvestment rate of 8.00%. RECEIVED 03/22/2018 Page 8 of 15 Joseph Spears-March 2,2018 (JobID: 1400025956) ASPEN BUILDING DEPARTMENT icto conundrum technologies' Measures of Predictability: Using "hurdle rates" Levelized Energy Cost(LEC) Solar Electric(PV):$0.17 per kWh Another dimension of concern about a proposed investment is the predictability of its anticipated costs and returns, which requires measures of the uncertainty associated with them. Levelized Energy Cost(LEC) analysis provides us with a"hurdle rate" (the levelized energy cost). LEC is the average lifetime cost of energy produced by a particular system.We can compare LEC to the current utility rate and its expected change in price as time goes on. In this manner one can judge the investment as a"better bet"than utility rates to contain energy costs. Assessing Option Value:The option value of a proposed investment represents the value of future opportunities that would be made available only if the investment were made. Like the ante in a poker game,the investment may promise no return other than the opportunity to look at the cards being dealt, at which point one can either fold or"exercise the option" by making additional investments in an attempt to win the pot.To realize future value here new investments are not necessarily required to"exercise the options"-ownership is enough. In the case of renewable energy systems in general,there are primarily two opportunities, or options, which may have future value: Property value appreciation, and Renewable energy certificates (RECs or SRECs): Property Value Appreciation:$40,660 Installing a renewable energy system can result in increased property valuation.The(few) papers on this topic assume that by decreasing utility bills(operating costs)the property owner's cash flow can accommodate higher loan-to-value ratios. In other words, by reducing monthly expenses, a property owner can afford to take on more debt. According to one report by the Appraisal Journal a homes value can increase by$20,000 for every$1,000 reduction in annual operating costs due to energy efficiency improvements. This assumes a 5%cost of money($20,000 x 5%interest=$1,000). Property value appreciation is estimated to be: $40,660= 1st-year utility savings of$2,033 x 20 years (Note: If system life is expected to be more than 20 years,then 20 years is used.) The following factors should be kept in mind: 1.The annual savings will not be the same every year. Utility inflation rates, assuming the renewable energy system is grid connected,will alter the annual savings over time- more savings with utility rate inflation, less if utility rate deflation occurs. 2.At some point in the system's life, its value as a"saleable"asset will start to reduce to zero as the system comes to its end of life. 3. Property valuations are based upon many variables(external factors), many of which are location-specific and/or contingent upon macro-economic and micro-economic factors such as interest rates,the economy, new developments, changing lifestyle and living patterns, etc. A property's value can change by many percentage points as a result of these external factors and one needs to consider the amount of value a renewable energy system may add to a property vis-a-vis the overall property's value. Renewable Energy and/or Carbon Credits or Certificate (REC or SREC): Renewable Energy Certificates (sometimes called "solar renewable energy credits/certificates"-SRECs, S-RECs, or simply RECs) are a new and evolving method to ascribe future financial value to a renewable energy system. RECs represent the bundle of legal rights to the"green" part of each unit of energy produced by a renewable energy system.This green part can be sold for a value,which generates additional revenue for the seller. These certificates can be sold and traded or bartered and the owner of the REC can claim to have purchased renewable energy. EIVE11) 03/22/2018 Page 9 of 15 Joseph Spears-March 2,2018 (JobID: 1400025956) ASPEN BUILDING DEPARTMENT c t l conundrum technologies Utility Energy Summary: Electric Electric Utility Rates Current Rate Post Project Rate Fixed Price per unit$0.1300/kWh Fixed Price per unit Average Cost: $0.13 per kWh Average Cost: $0.13 per kWh Tiered Rate: No Tiered Rate: No Time-of-Use Rate: No Time-of-Use Rate: No Demand Charges: No Demand Charges: No Summary of Utility&New Source Electricity MIL Electric by Month(kWh) ME Mar AK RAty Jun Jul Aug p Oct Nov Dec Total Entered into Software(historical) Monthly Use 2,000 2,000 2,000 2,000 2,000 2,000 2,000 2,000 2,000 2,000 2,000 2,000 24,000 Historical Cost $500 $500 $500 $500 $500 $500 $500 $500 $500 $500 $500 $500 $6,000 Estimated by Software at Current Rates Estimated Use 2,000 2,000 2,000 2,000 2,000 2,000 2,000 2,000 2,000 2,000 2,000 2,000 24,000 Current Cost $260 $260 $260 $260 $260 $260 $260 $260 $260 $260 $260 $260 $3,120 PV Production (855) (1,095) (1,467) (1,405) (1,583) (1,503) (1,348) (1,397) (1,342) (1,282) (985) (811) Post Project Use 1,145 905 533 595 417 497 652 603 658 718 1,015 1,189 8,927 Post Project Cost $149 $118 $69 $77 $54 $65 $85 $78 $86 $93 $132 $155 $1,161 Production Self-Consumption Percent: 44% 34% 30% 31% 31% 32% 36% 34% 31% 33% 37% 43% Minimum monthly meter fees may apply and are not included in this analysis. RECEIVE( 03/22/2018 Page 10 of 15 Joseph Spears-March 2,2018 (JobID: 1400025956) ASPEN BUILDING DEPARTMENT aconundrum technologies' 40 Cash Flow Details for the System Cash Flows in Year 0 1 2 3 4 Gross Cost:PV (43,000) O&M Cost:PV 0 (111) (114) (117) (120) Utility Bill Savings with Inflation Applied 0 2,033 2,104 2,177 2,253 Solar Electric(PV)Incentives Federal Tax Credit(30%of Gross Cost at Installation) 12,900 0 0 0 0 Total Incentives 12,900 0 0 0 0 Net Annual Cash Flow (30,100) 1,922 1,990 2,060 2,133 Cumulative Cash Flow (30,100) (28,178) (26,188) (24,128) (21,995) Net Annual Cash Flow is the sum of values in gray lines. Cash Flows in Year ■ _ O&M Cost:PV (123) (127) (130) (134) (138) Utility Bill Savings with Inflation Applied 2,332 2,413 2,497 2,584 2,675 Net Annual Cash Flow 2,209 2,286 2,367 2,450 2,537 Cumulative Cash Flow (19,786) (17,500) (15,133) (12,683) (10,146) ' Cash Flows in Year 10 11 12 13 14 O&M Cost:PV (142) (146) (12,232) (154) (158) Utility Bill Savings with Inflation Applied 2,768 2,865 2,964 3,067 3,174 Net Annual Cash Flow 2,626 2,719 (9,268) 2,913 3,016 Cumulative Cash Flow (7,520) (4,801) (14,069) (11,156) (8,140) Cash Flows in Year 15 16 17 18 19 O&M Cost:PV (163) (167) (172) (177) (182) Utility Bill Savings with Inflation Applied 3,284 3,398 3,517 3,639 3,765 Net Annual Cash Flow 3,121 3,231 3,345 3,462 3,583 Cumulative Cash Flow (5,019) (1,788) 1,557 5,019 8,602 Cash Flows in Year 20 21 22 23 24 O&M Cost:PV (187) (192) (197) (203) (209) Utility Bill Savings with Inflation Applied 3,896 4,032 4,172 4,316 4,466 Net Annual Cash Flow 3,709 3,840 3,975 4,113 4,257 Cumulative Cash Flow 12,311 16,151 20,126 24,239 28,496 RECEIVED 03/22/2018 Page 11 of 15 Joseph Spears-March 2,2018 (JobID: 1400025956) ASPEN BUILDING DEPARTMENT c t l conundrum technologies Cash Flow Details for the System Cash Flows in Year 25 26 27 28 29 O&M Cost:PV (214) 0 0 0 0 Utility Bill Savings with Inflation Applied 4,622 0 0 0 0 Net Annual Cash Flow 4,408 0 0 0 0 Cumulative Cash Flow 32,904 0 0 0 0 03/22/2018 Page 12 of 15 Joseph Spears-March 2,2018 (JobID: 1400025956) ASPEN BUILDING DEPARTMENT ;Pio conundrum technologies' Other Assumptions Used in this Analysis Customer Type: Residential. Tax Effects Applied to Utility Savings:As a residential customer,we have assumed Post-tax (net income)dollars are saved.Therefore no tax effects are assumed. System Life: PV System:25 years. Inverters: 12 years. PV System Modeling Variables(PVWatts references): System Losses:7%, DC-to-AC Ratio: 1.13, Module Type: Premium (high efficiency), Inverter Efficiency: 96.00%. Performance Degradation and O&M Costs:We have assumed performance will degrade by 0.75%per year due to soiling and general wear. Annual operating and maintenance (O&M)costs are inflated 2.80%per year, and are estimated as a percent of gross system price, as follows: Solar Electric(PV):0.25%. Income Tax Rates: Federal:28.00%, State:5.00% Annual Inflation Rates:Consumer price index: 2.80%, Electric Rates:3.78% Energy Metering Type: Net Metering Net Excess Generation (NEG): Monthly NEG credited at Utility Rate. Monthly NEG may be carried forward to the next month for application to future utility bills. Annual NEG Not sold. Discount Rate:5.00%. Used to estimate net present value of future cash flows. This is also assumed to be the finance rate, as used to calculate MIRR. Reinvestment Rate: 8.00%. Used to calculate MIRR. Carbon Dioxide(CO2)Calculations:The following assumptions are used to calculate carbon dioxide(CO2) reductions: Electricity: 1.64 lbs. CO2 per kWh. Natural Gas:0.12 lbs. CO2 per cubic foot(12 lbs. per Therm). Fuel Oil:22.29 lbs. CO2 per gallon. Propane: 12.17 lbs. CO2 per gallon.Trees Planted:0.0429 tons CO2 per Tree planted (23.3 Trees/Ton CO2). Automiles Saved: 1 lb CO2 per mile for medium passenger car(2,000 Miles/Ton CO2). Gallons Gasoline:0.009812 tons CO2/gallon (102 Gal/Ton CO2). Landfill Tons:3.16 tons CO2 per ton of waste recycled instead of landfilled. Single-family Homes (electric use):8.82 tons CO2/home (0.11 Homes/Ton CO2).Tons of Coal Burned: 2.0525 lbs. of CO2 per lb. of Coal (2,000 lbs. per ton). Source:www.epa.gov/cleanenergy/energy-resources/refs.html Water used by Thermoelectric Powerplants: Depending upon the technology used, natural gas and coal power plants withdraw up to 20 gallons of water for every kWh of energy produced and consume (via evaporation)about 0.47 gallons per kWh produced. Sources: http://nrel.gov/docs/fy04osti/33905.pdf and http://www.wri.org/resou rces/charts-graphs/typical-range-water-withdrawals-and-consumption-thermoelectric-power-plants which summarizes the Electric Power Research Institue s report Water& Sustainability(Volume 3):U.S. Water Consumption for Power Production- The Next Half Century EIVE11) 03/22/2018 Page 13 of 15 Joseph Spears-March 2,2018 (JobID: 1400025956) ASPEN BUILDING DEPARTMENT i t l conundrum technologies PV Production by Year PV system production will vary according to weather patterns, changes in obstacles that may shade the PV panels, and the like. Over time system production may also"degrade"due to general soiling and other effects of aging. The table below provides a range(+/-20%)of typical annual production values for the system, by year, with an annual performance degradation of 0.75%included.The"Typical"values were used to provide this report. Year Low Typical Typical High Typical 1 12,058 kWh 15,073 kWh 18,088 kWh 2 11,968 kWh 14,960 kWh 17,952 kWh 3 11,878 kWh 14,847 kWh 17,816 kWh 4 11,787 kWh 14,734 kWh 17,681 kWh 5 11,697 kWh 14,621 kWh 17,545 kWh 6 11,606 kWh 14,508 kWh 17,409 kWh 7 11,516 kWh 14,395 kWh 17,274 kWh 8 11,425 kWh 14,282 kWh 17,138 kWh 9 11,335 kWh 14,169 kWh 17,002 kWh 10 11,244 kWh 14,056 kWh 16,867 kWh 11 11,154 kWh 13,943 kWh 16,731 kWh 12 11,064 kWh 13,829 kWh 16,595 kWh 13 10,973 kWh 13,716 kWh 16,460 kWh 14 10,883 kWh 13,603 kWh 16,324 kWh 15 10,792 kWh 13,490 kWh 16,188 kWh 16 10,702 kWh 13,377 kWh 16,053 kWh 17 10,611 kWh 13,264 kWh 15,917 kWh 18 10,521 kWh 13,151 kWh 15,781 kWh 19 10,431 kWh 13,038 kWh 15,646 kWh 20 10,340 kWh 12,925 kWh 15,510 kWh 21 10,250 kWh 12,812 kWh 15,374 kWh 22 10,159 kWh 12,699 kWh 15,239 kWh 23 10,069 kWh 12,586 kWh 15,103 kWh 24 9,978 kWh 12,473 kWh 14,967 kWh 25 9,888 kWh 12,360 kWh 14,832 kWh Totals 274,329 kWh 342,911 kWh 411,493 kWh 03/22/2018 Page 14 of 15 Joseph Spears-March 2,2018 (JobID: 1400025956) ASPEN BUILDING DEPARTMENT t l conundrum technologies Renewable Resources The following renewable resource assumptions were used to develop estimates for the project location. These are typical values based upon observed data over several decades. Actual values (and system performance)will vary from month to month, and from year to year, in accordance to weather and climate pattern changes. Weather station referenced: "ASPEN PITKIN CO SAR" (Colorado) Solar Resources: Flat-Plate, South-facing Tilted at Latitude Month Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec kWh/m2/day 3.835 5.333 6.395 6.174 6.615 6.506 5.758 6.087 6.137 5.749 4.622 3.643 I,_ , f1 r r_ '' ,t. 03/22/2018 Page 15 of 15 Joseph Spears-March 2,2018 (JobID: 1400025956) ASPEN BUILDING DEPARTMENT 1 L it I,' �1 ////r.I� a` " l ' .'i t ,- FRONT VIEW - SIDE VIEW 0 r 13„ l ' Lk 6" 2116„ 176„ J r 1 / 1 r 1 ii�U N I RAC' PRODUCT LINE: RM DRAWING NOT TO SCALE r ALL DIMENSIONS ARE NOMINAL O DRAWING TYPE: COMPONENT ASSEMBLY Q 1411 BROADWAY BLVD NE ALBUOUEROUE,NM 87102 USA DESCRIPTION: BAY & MODULE CLIPS PRODUCT PROTECTED BY ONE : ED WWW.UNIRAC.COM OR MORE US PATENTS J` REVISION DATE: APRIL / 2016 LEGAL NOTICE �j �SHEET O8� ASPEN BUILDING DEPARTMENT 1 2 BLOCK BAY I i 1 BLOCK BAY r �/ , ..I 1 i Iiiiiiik ya 4 BLOCK BAY 1, Of1 177,-•!ice 3 BLOCK BAY r 1 / 1 r 1 ii:U N I RAC PRODUCT LINE: RM DRAWING NOT TO SCALE N ALL DIMENSIONS ARE NOMINAL O DRAWING TYPE: ASSEMBLY Q 1411 BROADWAY BLVD NE ALBUOUEROUE,NM 87102 USA DESCRIPTION: 1-2-3-4 BLOCK RM PRODUCT PROTECTED BY ONE ` . : ED BAYS OR MORE US PATENTS I WWW.UNIRAC.COM 03 22/2018 J REVISION DATE: APRIL 2016 LEGAL NOTICE J SHEET J ASPEN BUILDING DEPARTMENT NOTE: ARRAY DIMENSIONS WILL VARY BASED ON MODULE WIDTH, LENGTH AND RETURN FLANGE Amir TOP VIEW 155" IN- 1 0 0 1 0 0 77" 39" Nominal Module Dimensions Example 133" 1 0 0 1 0 I I 0 0 0 1 0 1 SIDE VIEW [ 13 6" _E 18" 19" T .. J r 1 / 1 1 1 ••�U N I RAC' PRODUCT LINE: RM DRAWING NOT TO SCALE CI ALL DIMENSIONS ARE NOMINAL 0 DRAWING TYPE: ASSEMBLY a 1411 BROADWAY BLVD NE ALBUOUEROUE,NM 87102 USA DESCRIPTION: 4 MODULE RM PRODUCT PROTECTED BY ONE ` . ,�' : ED WWW.UNIRAC.COM LAYOUT OR MORE US PATENTS I J REVISION DATE: APRIL 03/22/2018 LEGAL NOTICE �j �S E HET j ASPEN BUILDING DEPARTMENT 1 rf ,, -----,,,,„, _J„ , FRONT VIEW SIDE VIEW _ 2$„ , h 7 „ 16 • 216° �- .i / 1„ 8 _ \ 2" V ki- 18 - 28' 8 J r 1r 1 r 1 ii:U N I RAC, PRODUCT LINE: RM DRAWING NOT TO SCALE r ALL DIMENSIONS ARE NOMINAL CO DRAWING TYPE: PART CIN I 1411 BROADWAY BLVD NE ALBUQUERQUE,NM 87102 USA DESCRIPTION: RM CLIP & BOLT PRODUCT PROTECTED BY ONE ` . 110:i' : ED WWW.UNIRAC.COM OR MORE US PATENTS REVISION DATE: APRIL- 2016 03/22./2018 J LEGAL NOTICE J SHEET J ASPEN BUILDING DEPARTMENT Material: TPE 70 Shore A: Santoprene 201-73, Elastocon 2870 or Unisoft TPE ST-70A BK-2-01. Color: Black I'\r, dik 4" X TOP VIEW SIDE VIEW , . i flml 2g„ (.139") 10$,, r 1 / 1 [ ( O U N I RAC PRODUCT LINE: RM DRAWING NOT TO SCALE N ALL DIMENSIONS ARE NOMINAL 0 DRAWING TYPE: PART IL I 1411 BROADWAY BLVD NE ALBUOUEROUE,NM 87102 USA DESCRIPTION: RM FOOT PAD PRODUCT PROTECTED BY ONE ` .' 117,i' • ED WWW.UNIRAC.COM OR MORE US PATENTS J` REVISION DATE: APRIL / 2016 LEGAL NOTICE �j �SHEET O8� ASPEN BUILDING DEPARTMENT .- � esf.: ,...- - ._.---".--:„.--',.--` .7. ..--1 ''74titto, . :" - : / e o.0; �, . .,;!:',.. .'1'..&,.- . ..; ' Vid.:-,',„-U _-.s%z-v- ,"..''' ---'' '. IllIllilIl .__- _-- . :.,,.. ' .f.,,L;: ' v.-., Ar SunPower° X22-360-C-AC 1 Residential AC Module Series Design-Driven Advantages ©22 • #1 module aesthetics and efficiency, • Unmatched module reliability2 ■.■■..111■ SERIES • No electrolytic capacitors ■■.■■■■■ • 25-year Combined Power and Product u■■■■■■ Warranty IIIIrllIlMaximize Value for Roof 111111111111 • Size system for root not string inverter • Optimize performance of each module ■.N■■■■ Expand Deployment Options .11M111.. • Complex roofs and partial shading ■■N■■■■ • Small systems 1.1111111111. ______ • System expandability Simplify & Speed Installation Optimize System and Installation Efficiency • Factory-integrated microinverter • Robust,double locking AC connectors SunPower®AC Modules,which include a factory-integrated • Design flexibility offsite and onsite SunPower microinverter, provide a revolutionary combination of high • No DC string sizing process efficiency,high reliability,and module-level DC-to-AC power conversion. • Fewer installation steps than competing systems Designed specifically for use with SunPower InvisiMountrm and the • Intuitive commissioning SunPower Monitoring System,SunPower AC Modules enable rapid installation,best-in-class system aesthetics,and intuitive visibility into Component of Complete System Built for use with SunPower°InvisiMountT"" system performance.All this comes with the best Combined Power • and the SunPower Monitoring System and Product Warranty. • Superior system reliability and aesthetics NO , ,;C) 1. „, „ Y �,, , , a sunpower.com ,- RECEIVED Datasheet SUN1 OY 'd/ ER® z- ti s .r 7 F• r t • ,! SunPower° X22-360-C-AC I Residential AC Module Series Power Data Mechanical Data SPR-X22-360-C-AC Solar Cells 96 Monocrystalline Maxeon®Gen Ill Nominal Power3(Pnom) 360 W Front Glass High-transmission tempered glass with anti- Power Tolerance +5/-0% reflective coating Avg.Panel Efficiency4 22.2% Environmental Temp.Coef.(Power) -0.30%/°C Rating Outdoor rated Three bypass diodes Frame Class 1 black anodized(highest AAMA rating) •Shade Tolerance • Integrated module-level maximum power Weight 41 lbs(18.6 kg) point tracking Max. Recommended 1.3 in.(33 mm) Module Spacing AC Electrical Data Output @ 240 V(min./nom./max.) 211/240/264 V Output @ 208 V(min./nom./max.) 183/208/229 V Warranties and Certifications Operating Frequency(min./nom./max.) 59.3/60.0/60.5 Hz Warranties • 25-year limited power warranty Output Power Factor(min.) 0.99 • 25-year limited product warranty AC Max.Continuous Output Current @ 240 V 1.33 A • UL 1741,including compliance with AC Max.Continuous Output Current @ 208 V 1.54 A applicable requirements of IEEE 1547 and AC Max.Cont.Output Power 320 W IEEE 1547.1 DC/AC CEC Conversion Efficiency 96.0% • AC module Type 2 Fire Rated Max.Units Per 20 A Branch Circuit @ 240 V 12(single phase) • UL 2703 Listed when installed with Max.Units Per 20 A Branch Circuit @ 208 V 10(two pole) InvisiMounfm Certifications • Class A Fire Rated when installed with InvisiMountTM and when distance between Tested Operating Conditions roof surface and bottom of SunPower Operating Temp. -40°F to+185°F(-40°C to+85°C) module frame is<_3.5"(8.89 cm) Max.Ambient Temp. 122°F(50°C) • Alternating Current(AC)Module designation Max.Load Wind:50 psf,2400 Pa,244 kg/m2 front&back enables installation in accordance with NEC Snow:112 psf,5400 Pa,550 kg/m2 front 690.6 1 inch(25 mm)diameter hail at 52 mph(23 PID Test Potential-induced degradation free Impact Resistance m/s) 280 mm [11.02 in] i— 1.11 1107 mm �, Mg. �O r• � 1ma [41.2 in]1046 mm �L I. 30 mm it 4■ [1.2 in] 1Highest of over 3,200 silicon solar panels,Photon Module Survey,Feb.2014 1■ 2#1 rank in"PV Module Durability Initiative Public Report,"Fraunhofer CSE,Feb 2013.Five out of the 1558 mm top eight largest manufacturers were tested.Campeau,Z.et al."SunPower Module Degradation Rate," �' [61.3 in] SunPower white paper,Feb 2013.See www.sunpower.com/facts for details. 3Standard Test Conditions(1000 W/m2 irradiance,AM 1.5,25°C).NREL calibration standard:SOMS current,LACCS FF and voltage.All DC voltage is fully contained within the module. Please read the safety and installation instructions for details. ^Based on average of measured power values during production. RECEIVED See www.sunpower.com/facts for more reference information. For more details,see extended datasheet:www.sunpower.com/datasheets. Document#516046 Rev A/LTR_US ©2015 SunPower Corporation.All rights reserved.SUNPOWER,the SUNPOWER logo,MAXEON,and INVISIMOUNT SUNPOWER''' , are trademarks or registered trademarks of SunPower Corporation in the U.S.and other countries as well. Specifications included in this datasheet are subject to change without notice.