The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutLand Use Case.1275 Ute Ave.A14-9494*: N J. LL LLC L LUCL L L U V -1 V LA L L. ,-Â· L L 1 -L L L %- <11 5 U 1,6 Act A14-94 2737-184-03-002 - 1 G f I- R I , f I i - - A.F 09â‚¬EP 27 '94' 073 56A'f-AGPEN *IRErm- FAX<303)9221853 TO 9704451 p. 15112 374628 B-762 P-446 09/27/94 10:18A PG 1 OF - REC DOC NO SILVIA DAVIS PITKIN COUNTY CLERK & RECORDER 5.00 APPROVED cco 9 7 -laa September 23 1994 0/. -70 - 84 Mr. Ed Walraven OPTE - 2. 1 City of Aopen Fire MArshall 420 E Hopkins Avenue Aspen, Colorado 81611 ARE MARSHAL_,4~Â¢~- RE: Winnerman Residence / Win Win Enterprises, LLC Ute Park Subdivision, Lot 2 Aspen CO SUBJECT: Fire Department Access Easement Dear Ed, Thiâ€¢ letter will serve as our acknowledgement and acceptance of your departments conditions of approval to permit the use of our driveway as an access easement for a fire truck turnaround. It ig our underetanding that t.he driveway areaâ€¢ as shown on Lota 2 and 3 will be adequate for turnaround uge in lieu of the Lot 02 for accâ€¢,e easement indicated on the recorded Final POD Development Plan, dated 2/18/93. We agree to the conditions ai follows: 1) The driveway shall be clear of obstructions at all times, including but not limited to structures, gates, fences, barricades, or other obetructions. 21 Snow removal shall occur promptly to ensure clear access to the driveway. 3) All conditions are binding on the property. 4) No vehicular long term (absentee) parking will bâ€¢ permitted in the driveway. 5) Any vehicle parked in the driveway will be moved in the event of an emergency or at the requeat of the Fire Marshall. 6) Vehicles shall not be parked in the driveway in such a manner am to render the turnaround unueable. Lawrence u'Winnezman Managing Partner TOTAL P.02 'Â· 1 CASELOAD SUMMARY SHEET City of Aspen DATE RECEIVED:02 /14/94 PARCEL ID AND CASE NO. DATE COMPLETE: 2737-184-03-002 A14-94 STAFF MEMBER: ML' 6" Â¤ PROJECT NAME: Winnerman 8040 Greenline Application Project Address: Ute Park Subdivision Legal Address: Lot 2 APPLICANT: Larry Winnerman Applicant Address: 317 Park Avenue REPRESENTATIVE: Ted Guv Associates 124 0 ka-za-Ici 927-3167 Representative Address/Phone: Box 1640 Basalt, CO 81621 FEES: PLANNING $ 978 # APPS RECEIVED 4 ENGINEER $ 96 # PLATS RECEIVED 4 HOUSING $ ENV. HEALTH $ TOTAL $ 1074 TYPE OF APPLICATION: STAFF APPROVAL: 1 STEP: X 2 STEP: P&Z Meeting Date ~~ 3 PUBLIC HEARING: YES (~~) VESTED RIGHTS: YES lid CC Meeting Date PUBLIC HEARING: YES NO VESTED RIGHTS: YES NO DRC Meeting Date REFERRALS: 40 -- C City Attorney X Parks Dept. School District ~><r City Engineer Bldg Inspector Rocky Mtn NatGas Housing Dir. Fire Marshal CDOT X Aspen Water Holy Cross Clean Air Board City Electric Mtn. Bell Open Space Board Envir.Hlth. * ACSD Other Zoning Energy Center Other DATE REFERRED: 31/D INITIALS: 44/ DUE: f~ ~ \ / FINAL ROUTING: DATE ROUTED: 9/5> 4/ZZV~INITIAL: 74'/2.~ 1 , -1 1 City Atty ~ City Engineer >< Zoning Env. Health Housing - Open Space _* Other: ~3 12 k f FILE STATUS AND LOCATION: MEMORANDUM TO: Planning and Zoning Commission FROM: Kim Johnson, Planner DATE: June 21, 1994 Re: Winnerman 8040 Greenline Review Summary: The Planning Office recommends approval of the Winnerman 8040 Greenline review with conditions. This review is being held in conjunction with the Nathanson 8040 review as both parcels are neighboring lots which share a private access driveway. Applicant: Larry Winnerman, represented by Jack Palomino Location / Zoning: This 1.0 acre parcel (Lot 2) is located in the Ute Park Subdivision on the south side of the east end of Ute Ave. across from the Aspen Club. The zoning is AH Affordable Housing. Request: The applicant wishes to construct a four-bedroom single family residence of approximately 5,621 s.f. 6312 Process: The Planning Commission makes final determinations on 8040 Greenline reviews. Background: This parcel is one of three free market lots created in the Ute Park AH Subdivision approved in 1992. Each of the free market lots must receive individual 8040 Greenline approval. The Winnerman review has been submitted in conjunction with one of the other free market lots in the subdivision, the Nathanson 8040 review. The deed restricted townhomes in the development have been completed and are occupied at this time. The Ute Park Subdivision is impacted by two avalanche chutes. The original subdivision review noted red zones (greater hazard) and blue zones (lesser hazard) on the created parcels. The Winnerman parcel includes a platted building envelope which identifies a portion of the envelope in the blue zone. Within the application, avalanche consultant Art Mears submitted comments on appropriate building and site design to mitigate avalanche hazards. A revised site plan was submitted on May 27 showing the structure to be located outside of the blue zone area. Referral Comments: Referral comments were requested from Parks, Engineering and Water Departments. Referral memos are attached as Exhibit "A" . The summaries of comments received are as follows: Engineering: Chuck Roth forwarded the following comments: 1) Run-off from the site during construction must be prevented by 1 At detention ponds, hay bales, or similar methods. 2) All activity should be prevented outside the limit of construction to protect the native vegetation - fencing should be installed at the building envelope as a minimum measure. 3) Regrading outside of the building envelope cannot take place without a variance. Driveway grading appears to be excessive, beyond the scope of the retaining wall. The retaining wall is shown as rock wall in some drawings, and concrete wall in others. 4) The grading plan within the envelope is not explicit unless "tie-back wall" construction is employed. 5) The avalanche warning signs as required by the subdivision approval have not been erected. 6) The Fire Marshall shall sign off on building permits regarding fire access and building sprinklers (required as a condition of subdivision approval). Parks (Rebecca Baker): 1) No detailed landscape plan has been submitted. 2) Tree removal permits are required for any tree 6"diameter or greater which will be removed or relocated. Application for tree removal permits must occur no less than two weeks prior to submittal for the building/excavation permits. 3) Protection of existing vegetation outside of the building envelope is critical. A barricade must be erected and inspected by Parks or Planning prior to any grading or storage on the site. 4) The 21 inch fir at the southeast corner of the proposed house should remain, with protective barricading during construction. Staff Comments: 8040 Greenline Pursuant to Section 7-503 of the Land Use Code, the following review criteria pertain to any development above, or within 150' below, the 8040' elevation line: I. The parcel on which the proposed development is to be located is suitable for development considering its slope, ground stability characteristics, including mine subsidence and the possibility of mud flow, rock falls and avalanche dangers. If the parcel is found to contain hazardous or toxic soils, the applicant shall stabilize and revegetate the soils , Or, where necessary, cause them to be removed from the site to a location acceptable to the City. Response: The application states that all development is located off of 30% slopes. The avalanche hazard has been addressed by the applicant by moving the structure to the "unconditional" portion of the building envelope. However, avalanches might still flow through the trees in the unconditional areas, and the building's structure and window/door openings on the south side must be designed with this in mind (see Art Mear's letter dated January 11, 1994). 2 46 II. The proposed development does not have a significant adverse affect on the natural watershed, runoff, drainage, soil erosion or have consequent effects on water pollution. Response: The development must comply with drainage requirements which call for an engineered drainage plan stamped by an engineer and approved by the City Engineer prior to issuance of any building permits. Hay bales, detention areas or similar methods must be used downslope of any soil disturbance to stop loose or waterborne soils. Any regraded or disturbed areas must be revegetated and mulched immediately. III. The proposed development does not have a significant adverse affect on the air quality in the City. Response: This development will not affect air quality in significant levels. No wood burning fireplaces are allowed. IV. The design and location of any proposed development, road, or trail is compatible with the terrain on the parcel on which the proposed development is to be located. Response: As mentioned in the Engineering referral, the regrading above the entry road seems excessive. Planning staff has met with Hans Brucker, the subdivision's design engineer, to explore methods of reducing the significant backslope cut for the private driveway. Hans understands staff's concerns about visual impacts and revegetation concerns. He will work on minimizing the slope cuts. This may entail raising the retaining wall somewhat. The original representation in the subdivision review stated that the retaining wall would be 4'-6' tall. Staff continues to recommend that landscaping be planted in front of the wall to reduce the visual impact of the wall. This should be done upon completion of the wall when revegetation takes place. Last summer, a trail was cut through this parcel by the Nordic Council which created much damage to the hillside and vegetation and strayed away from the alignment as platted. Although not the responsibility of this applicant, staff recommends that the Commission direct staff to notify the Nordic Council that the trail cut is a violation of the 8040 regulations. The Nordic Council should be required to submit an application for 8040 review for the trail, and correction of the errors should be made as soon as possible. V. Any grading will minimize, to the extent practicable, disturbance to the terrain, vegetation and natural land features. Response: A grading plan was not submitted in time to fully address this criteria. Several mature evergreens and even more 3 41 middle aged aspens are being lost because of their central location on the site. Staff questions why the 21 inch fir at the southeast corner is shown to be removed - it is approximately 10 feet uphill from the structure. Due to the loss of other sizable trees on site, this tree should remain as a condition of approval. The patio on the southwest corner of the house requires the removal of four 4" aspen trees. This patio also faces uphill in an area subject to avalanche flow through the trees (see Art Mears' letter dated January 11, 1994). Because Of these reasons and the excavation concerns expressed below, staff recommends that this patio be deleted from the plans, and protective barricades be erected to help save two of the trees. VI. The placement and clustering of structures will minimize the need for roads, limit cutting and grading, maintain open space, and preserve the mountain as a scenic resource. Response: Staff has already discussed the private driveway design concerns. The residence as proposed makes excessive cuts into the hillside to accommodate the exposed northwestern wall and the semi- circular patio at the rear of the house. Without a landscaping plan which includes the boulder retaining wall for the private entry road, it is difficult to know how much of the structure will be screened from below. However, staff recognizes that due to the location of the building envelope/structure on the Nathanson parcel, specific landscaping of the front of the Winnerman house is not as critical as the other three sides. Prior to issuance of any building permit, Planning and Parks staff must review a landscaping plan which adds screening vegetation along the front and sides of the structure as well as the retaining wall for the private entry driveway. VII. Building height and bulk will be minimized and the structure will be designed to blend into the open character of the mountain. Response: The maximum FAR for Lot 2 is 5,770 s.f. The proposed FAR is 5,621 s.f. The home stretches completely across the "unconditional" portion of the building envelope, approximately 70 feet. The slope adjacent to the entry road requires a lot of excavation for access to the garage. This "exposes" much more of the building facade, although the heights (from the front view) appear not to exceed the 25' limit of the AH zone district. Staff is concerned however, that the north (west) elevation shows a massive amount of exposed facade and building height. Without a grading plan and height measurements, it cannot be determined that this facade is in compliance with height limits. It is recommended that the north elevation is not excavated to the extent shown (the whole lower level is exposed). Window wells can permit light and egress without as much visual impact. Exposed walls count toward FAR. Zoning staff will make final calculations of FAR. 4 4% As with the Nathanson residence, staff recommends a condition of approval requiring medium or darker earthtones for any exterior materials or paint. VIII. Sufficient water pressure and other utilities are available to service the proposed development. Response: "Will serve" letters had been provided by the water and sanitation utilities during subdivision review. IX. Adequate roads are available to serve the proposed development, and said roads can be properly maintained. Response: The Ute Park Subdivision participated in the Ute Avenue Improvement District for road upgrades. X. Adequate ingress and egress is available to the proposed development SO as to ensure adequate access for fire protection and snow removal equipment. Response: The private entry road must be constructed in accordance with the City's driveway requirements. At the time of subdivision review, the Fire Marshal requested that the driveway be snowmelted, but this did not become a condition of approval for the subdivision. The structure on this lot must be sprinklered per the Ute Park Subdivision approval. The Fire Marshal must review the building permit prior to its issuance. XI. Any trail on the parcel designated on the Aspen Area Comprehensive Plan: Parks/Recreation/Open Space/Trails Plan map is dedicated for public use. Response: An easement to accommodate a hiking and nordic trail was obtained through subdivision approval in 1992. GRecommendation: The Planning Office recommends approval of the 4~~'8040 Greenline review with the following conditions: 1) Run-off from the site during construction must be prevented by detention ponds, hay bales, or similar methods to be ~~/~* approved by the City Engineer prior to the issuance of any 4 grading or building permits. 2) The lowest level of the structure on the north (west) side shall not be excavated or exposed except for minimal egress windows which may be required for bedrooms per the Building Code. 3) Excavation shall occur from the "inside out" from the downhill 5 .At / -7 side of the property. No equipment is permitted outside of the building envelope. 4) Prior to any grading or storage activity on the site, a sturdy, visible barricade shall be erected along the building envelope lines on the east, south and west to protect the existing grades and vegetation. L 5) The patio on the southhiest corner shall be eliminated from the plans Â· Â£~p~8*~00b*tt--~kl*@Â®4-%~i~I~~Â§1dR&5*99M41,' 6) Only native vegetation species as typically found on this site shall be used for revegetation of disturbed soil along the east, south and west side of the residence. Any regraded or disturbed areas must be revegetated and mulched or matted immediately. Avalanche warning signs as required by the subdivision must be erected prior to the issuance of any building permits. 8) A detailed landscape plan must be submitted to Planning and approved prior to the issuance of any building permits. -Â£ 9) Prior to the issuance of any building permits, tree removal permits from the Parks Department are required for any tree 6"diameter or greater which will be removed or relocated. Application for tree removal permits must occur no less than two weeks prior to submittal for the building/excavation permits. 10) Colors shall .W@0' *red{**3rf %# tc&Â·rlee~ earth tones to make the building /12-91-E' Â£-c~r the hillside. 0*fax.6.437- 11) There shall be no future grading on the site without 8040 review. The open area to the west of the residence shall remain undisturbed except for necessary control of weed pests as specified by the 1990 Colorado Weed Management Act and Pitkin County Land Management Department. 12) The Fire Marshall shall sign off on building permits regarding fire access and building sprinklers (required for Lot 2 as a condition of subdivision approval). 13) Landscaping shall be planted in front of the private entry driveway's retaining wall to reduce the visual impact of the wall. The landscaping plan which must be reviewed prior to the issuance of any building permit shall show this landscape treatment. The landscape shall be installed upon completion of the wall when revegetation takes place. The 21 inch fir tree at the southeast corner of the house must I -\) 5/9 remain. A barricade shall be placed no less than seven feet 42**<44 -6 eivq Â« 1~f-9499Â«~ f from the trunk along the side facing the construction. Two aspens at the southwest corner (where the patio was originally shown) shall also be protected by barricades no less than 5 feet from their trunks, as shown by the Planning Office's proposal. 15) All representations made by the applicant within the application or before the Planning and Zoning Commission shall be considered conditions of approval for this project. Recommended Motions: III move to approve the Winnerman 8040 Greenline Review with the 15 conditions listed in the 994* June 21, 1994 Planning Office memo." "I also move to direct staff to notify the Nordic Council that the trail cut on Lot 2 is a violation of the 8040 regulations. The Nordic Council must submit an application for 8040 review for the trail within 30 days of notice." 0 7 -'D n *-1)1/CNEA i VV 63 nu#mol .. Â» 4 Â»StÂ°ff- 4 11) 6%4 ~4844#-p*- C{ a Attachments: ED 63 f- 'fl "A" Application Information 7 /0 "B" Complete Referral Agency Memos j 7 PLAN G & ZONING COMMISSION EXHIBIT 8 , APPROVED ~ , 19 BY RESOLUTION . MEMORANDUM TO: Mary Lackner, Planning Office THRU: George Robinson, Parks Director FROM: Rebecca Baker, Parks Department DATE: June 14, 1994 RE: Nathanson/Winnerman 8040 Greenline Review We have reviewed both applications submitted for the Nathanson and Winnerman 8040 Greenline reviews. The major impacts of both of these projects involve tree removals and landscaping. TRN*iwng landscape of Lot 1, the Nathanson property, is primarily aspen grove. A vegetative protectionene should be maintained between the building envelope and the 10 foot right of way parallel to Ute AVenue. No vegetation should be removed from this area and the contractor should be encouraged to put up stiow fencing or similar type fencing to protect this area. Additionally, e.'14 several significant aspens are showh on the north west corner of the property which are proposed to be relocated for the deck construction. We would recommend reducing the deck on that side in order to save those trees. A tree permit must be submitted two weeks prior to an excavation permit to insure an acceptable mitigation plan for other tree relocations and/ or remov*. The Winnerman lot, lot 2, is primarily sub alpine forest with many significant fir, aspen, and other pines proposed to be removed. The proposed plan shows 87 + caliper inches of coniferous trees to be removed and 18 + caliper inches of deciduous tree to be removed. These trees are a significant loss to the area and mitigation will be required on a comparable worth basis either on site or dedicated monetarily to the City of Aspens tree management program. Additionally, a 21 inch fir tree close to the 8070 elevation line is shown to be removed of which I can see no necessity for its removal. This tree should be saved and protected during construction, including setting up any protective fencing around the tree so no digging occurs within five feet of the dripline of the tree. Protective fencing should also be provided for other significant trees close to the construction areas and no stock piling of dirt or other debris should occur around any trees. A tree permit should be applied for at least two weeks prior to granting an excavation permit. 0 MEMORANDUM To: Mary Lackner, Planning Office Thru: Cris Caruso, City Engineer (22~ From: Chuck Roth, Engineering Department (372.- Date: April 1, 1994 Re: Winnerman 8040 Greenline Review Having reviewed the above referenced application, and having made a site inspection, the Engineering Department has the following comments: 1. The existing PUD approvals that pertain to this property are contained in the agreement on file at Book 704, beginning at Page 216, at the Pitkin County Clerk & Recorders Office. The approvals for the subdivision in which this site is located apply to this application. 2. Storm Runoff During Construction - The application makes reference to providing for protection of the site during construction from damage due to erosion. A requirement that was lacking during the PUD review that should be included at this time is that protection must be provided during construction so that no runoff from soils exposed by excavation be permitted to leave the site. This is typically accomplished as suggested in the application letter by detention ponds and hay bales. 3. Vegetation & Scenic Resource - The application is incomplete in responding to review standards 5 and 6. The applicant should be required to install construction fencing to define the limits of construction activity and to protect the existing vegetation, natural land features, and scenic resource. The applicant is encouraged to preserve as much of the native vegetation as possible, but in any event, the fencing should protect at a minimum, the area outside of the approved building envelope. As with the Herron Park Place condition of approvals, it is suggested that it be stated that "the Zoning Enforcement Officer shall periodically inspect the site to determine compliance with" construction fencing, vegetation preservation, and erosion control measures. Item number 5 of the supplemental materials is unclear. Regrading of the site outside of the approved building envelope is not permitted. Stairways and retaining walls are indicated outside of the approved building envelope. Since this is an area between 6I 5 the driveway and the approved building envelope, it is probably not unreasonable to permit the variance. 4. Extent of Cut Slopes - The information contained in the application is unclear. The drawings show the structure set into the hillside as though there were no cut slopes used to accomplish the construction. Current technology does provide techniques capable of such construction, but the application does not discuss the details. The construction process is called "tied back walls," and the walls can be constructed from the top down so that no laid back cut slope is necessary for constructing foundation walls. The limit of grading shown on sheet A5 for the driveway appears to be much greater than necessary. The grading should not need to exceed the space needed for the proposed rock retaining wall. The building permit drawings should include one or more sections through the proposed driveway. 5. Retaining Wall - The plans show a retaining wall alongside the driveway. The plans are inconsistent with the wall which appears to be a concrete wall in some drawings and a rock wall in other drawings. 6. Avalanche Warning Signs - The signs required by item 8, Section 2 of Ordinance No. 18 (Series of 1992) have not been installed. It should be a condition of approval that the avalanche and rockfall warning signs be installed prior to the issuance of any further permits. 7. Hazardous or Toxic Soils - Item number 1 of the supplemental materials states that "no hazardous or toxic soils exist on the site (see attached soils report)." I did not find this information in the soils report. At the same time, it is not a requirement that an applicant conduct a hazardous or toxic soils survey for the property. The building permit drawings should contain a general note based on review standard number 1 stating, "If the parcel is found to contain hazardous or toxic soils, the property owner shall stabilize and revegetate the soils, or, where necessary, cause them to be removed from the site to a location acceptable to the city." 8. Fire Department Access Easement - This is shown on one set of plans but not on the other. It appears that proposed development would restrict the use of the easement. The fire marshal should be required to approve the final building permit plans. 9. Please note that concerning the approvals for the entire Ute Park Subdivision, the drainage improvements have not yet been completed for Lot 4, and the escrowed funds for those improvements should be maintained until such time as those improvements have been completed. M94.164 69 THEODORE K Gl 4SSOCIATES PC ARCHITECTS AND S 'TURAL ENGINEERS July 12, 1994 / 1 l JUL 1 4 joi Ms. Leslie Lamont, City Planning Director Aspen/Pitkin Planning Office 130 South Gajena Street Aspen, CO 81611 RE Winnerman Residence Lot 2, Ute Park Subdivision Aspen, CO SUBJECT: Zoning Ordinance Interpretation - Projection Into Front Yard Setback Dear Leslie: Bill Drueding has pointed out that our project is in violation of zoning regulations because the proposed driveway and adjacent retaining walls projecting into the front yard exceed the allowable thirty inch maximum grading cut below existing natural grade. Bill advised us a variance for this grading will be required before he can accept drawings submitted for permit. The private access road to the residence is more than thirty inches below grade. The grading cut to construct this access road is six feet below existing natural grade, thereby making it impossible for our proposed driveway to comply with current regulations for projections into front yard setbacks. The encroachment language does not specifically mention driveways having to conform to this maximum grading cut. In addition, retaining walls will have to be constructed within the front yard setback to gain pedestrian access from the road and driveway to the front door of the residence. Due to the circumstances created by construction of this access road we are hereby requesting you provide an interpretation of this ordinance which would permit construction of a driveway and retaining walls without a variance. If there are any questions regarding this request, please do not hesitate to contact me. Sinc@rely y.ours, /.-Â·Â· , i i V k 'f i\//f A K. / 1 ', // ,/ , -1 / L.;7 2. 0.-,r- ff /l~<Â·~ 1 , l) , Â·Â· Jack Palomino, AIA THEODORE K GUY ASSOCIATES PC JP4p 93172 L13 CC Larry Winnerman Kim Johnson Bill Drueding 23280 S la TF. 111[ : IWAY 822 P ( 1 HOX 1 G/{1 MASAI.T. CE.)11 111AI 1( 11-1 lf-,2 I (103 1 92 7-23 1 G , JUL 05 '94 14:58 THEODORE K GUY ASSOC PC A P.2 -**/GL; I ,- - i 1: 1, 11 1 1 ' /. .' '' '. .' .' .' .-'.. ... ---. I.-I;'.-I'' ' ... ' -'' -7Â»*r #A - ' - .,0- - '-- >7#/9*,1 F'*-' -,- '-:-' -' - :/ -'' ' -1Â£- A - --i-, n ~ 1*1 99**92ri<*141*qd#4 ' 0.55*uart: Rofets -fevile * 1210>*601//>le .Zi*),@##$0/ 75)9 7/9/9Â¢- i ./ 1 .. .. .... .... .- - Â» 82#*b Â»e#.i P -T 1,11- 1 11 Warf6&ve/ F ng,~4 e ~ ;-.--4- . -- ,/ # .-' - .- -. - .- *' 1 '-I 1 , i .d 24~-j***Â«. :076 99 - -- - --- 1,1 . .1 p- 4 *:er Ure/- - 4 730~6 ;Ny- -W' 1 I 44?af ... (/Ii %14 - l+3 i '' 1 . /*AL:. : U .7 --1.-1-1- 1.-- A i. 1 4 ve'Â· 11 fm.-... 1 1 0/vb Â£745t -~*r 4-evpiÂ£i-- ;" -_ -4%[â‚¬-416 -Â£Anki-,"Â» f~~- -- ., 1 -1-4 0.-Mae~ Ur 1 --S ......... 1. 1. . . . :t ! . IÂ·Â·v, ' '' 17. I .1.. 1 11 1 1 4 1 . I . . . 11 / 0â€¢- 1 .. b . 1 1. 1 . 1 1 1 1. 11:. 1 1 L THEODORE K GUY ASSOCIATES PC SHEET , ARCHITECTS AND 8Â¥AUCTURAL INGINEERS Un,terma K. 1 7 Alt*~MCE , P.O. BOX 1 edo BASALT, COLORADO e leal pos) 927-31 87 ~Al>lfleHA_24 Pron /Â» 93 De */AlÂ·19 /iye,j U*lÂ»fel---1 &4(0 2 5- 0/1/*. ~LYÂ£ 1 -24)26 Atio G 61- *r feed___ //78 74/ 972__ _ Â»44/- -485-2- 76*__- _53 92 . 9,1 91 + Â»Â« V/.4 tkY/ 44' tagj . 2060,0 1 h r + 1 * 2- .U/*;14Â» 2)0440 . .ler-4, ~L 631.5 lot-- --a,Â· I r-7 1-4.-LyÂ·-ilÂ·1 1 /2 = 1,-O,4 $ 3/ - 22' 11 \Â» - 4<3 49#06. rn %=11- / --- / 1-. ~~r ,- m.. ./--. f=* - 8080.6 -- --- --1 1 : . , \ k / t. r=' 1 , ft - n - -- , -' . 6 ..1 4, .--. L 4- r- r- . _ _~ ~_ _ .0 1 , 42_3 2--_31, - go,ajhs - 81,11. - bo44Â·0 3,64+Â·'GrIL 3021.6 e 1 - E U - E 47 ./:tAN I \01- Â« 0'[130 vÂ« 7 IA-Â» li k/ el tÂ¥14 \ 1 1-4 33 71_INE oF:Â·e,41â‚¬T. 100 a A W 0 & Â· - .Â¥.&-71*74~ 4 i p -- ~ ANT. Or@Â·ADE,liP. U F E-Â· ~ 1,1 . 1 -__ L - 1 / - 5/ . 2064 / 6 1 1 44 h 4 +1* EL Solo ' 11 - 1 0044.0 -24/+9.tkt- M.e 1 *21 - 1,-CON /5,/<644* Â«Â§% ..=li E -- Â« 9- -R-- - - 44 <-4------ Inl 1 11-t A <6 --- 117 1 1 W 49 21 IiI 21 1% i k G M s h , ,- : F.: 1.'11 + 4 11 5 1 4 2 .! : ni 1 7 0 11 : 3 t0 f 1 i.I IiI Jl - UP__-.+ t--1 1../. - tâ‚¬g ,--Â·-1 v r-k G 1.1-'; Â·'i ' i! i 41 1 9 23111, 1 1111, 6, di i. i I r.,1 'fi !1:le'' ..t .1 , # A "1 1 A-"In h CA.,]41-U- 111 + 4 1 1,1 1 11, 1, , , 1\ r 11:.,11; lill,~~j.li{!i~ .1 4 11 i tS YA Ilt> ,] 1)41 11 6.1:-iÂ·~ 1~~I.:i:111~4 k T=: 0 .- 1 j *- 1 1. 1: - 1 .it':~~ i -1 1 1,11. U 4 + =-: , T 111 - L.2 +,1 1 111 i. 1 /. i " 1 | '1!|r d. Al 'llf 1 ~I {! 1 A< /1 -72- r . gIA{"~1-cbttll 1 1/ #rtl 491 / 4/ 1 4 4// 9 r , 1114 0 i 1 Ni i N - 1- 7 \6) 1 0 4 5/7 - i * 1 1 3 1 18 1 TYP. LA I ~t 1 1_ -_ __1 + 4 1 i ; INe of EXIST Ik~ 4- 1 1 1-- 1 AA-T. arlgAOE, TYP. 0 2-4 1 -, 1 L -1 ,\~ JI -32:7/.-iLl .1 ~: - d 4 ; / -'41 2>034.6 #r- 12 4--"- 1= 1=1 //771 1 97 - t _ _f - ---2 -- _- 519 --1-- - LÂ«_u_pr.- -9-2.fT-~ ~i~--~37-J-- - - . -- r 7 - 1.- _~7* 1 r. . , -- '424 >4 1/- -' 80(270.9 V . TZI.FMr.--- - -- - ~ ~ ~ 6' *10 1-' J. -b-1.- 1 ' -- . 4 -2 - -9 - 1. 1 i . 1 1 RE=,7 ~ Â· .0 . i.1 1- ..t,/,74 F 1 --~ .- 1 1 -1,1. ! j i L_./'p - I . i 4" 1 4,1 :+t . ! t .1 3-~1-~ L 1 -Â·-,5..~ r .--4 Â·r.. <,:1- --1-64Â·4 .i. ,-{i-:. 0060,0 14/ACT - - --1 1 Flt~ge .."442* , - NCA:ELFra-1.1 ~ Â· - r - . 0031.6 l.3 1 \ f THEODORE K G ASSOCIATES PC AACHITECTS ANÂ¤ S CTUAAL ENGINEEAS 8040 Greenline Application Review Standards: This project will construct one single-family residence on Lot 2, Ute Park Subdivision which will conform to the laws and regulations of the City of Aspen, Colorado. Each of the specific standards are addressed below: 1. No development is proposed for any location designated by the avalanche engineer as high avalanche hazard (see Avalanche Engineers letter of November 1,1991 ). Part of the building envelope is designated as being of moderate hazard, and special structural design will be used for that part of the building in this area as prescribed by Arthur Mears letter of January 11, 1994. No hazardous or toxic soils exist on the site (see attached soils report). 2. The natural drainage of the site has been and will be protected. The building envelope has been carefully sited to avoid 30% slopes and predominant vegetation. Erosion control netting will be used during construction and revegetation of any regraded or disturbed areas will be done immediately upon completion. 3. A single-family residence is consistent with the existing use of the surrounding area. Since wood-burning fireplaces are not allowed, this development will not adversely affect the Aspen air quality. Dust suppresion measures will be taken during construction. 4. The proposed development will be set into the slope of the lot such that the height and bulk of the residence is minimized and is compatible with the existing terrain. 5. Regrading of the site will be minimized by designing the project sensitive to the site and its terrain. 6. Only one structure will be built on the site and it the building envelope is located so to minimize disturbance to the natural vegetation of the site. 7. The design will set the residence into the slope of the lot such that the height and bulk of the residence is minimized and is compatible with the open character of the mountain. From the access above, the home will appear as a one story structure and from below it will appear as two-stories. 8. The subdivision was created in consultation with the Aspen Water Department and the Aspen Consolidated Sanitation District. Both agencies have provided "will serve" letters. Further, City of Aspen Ordinance 18, Series of 1992 granted an exemption to Ute Park Subdivision with regard to the moritorium to the expansion of the municipal water system. 9. The Ute Park Subdivision has established a private access road which will serve this project and the other single-family residences of the subdivision. This road will be properly maintained by the homeowners association. 10. Ute Avenue and the private access road will provide access for emergency vehicles. A turn-around for emergency vehicles has been provided at the end of the access road. Snow removal will be the responsibility of the homeowners association. 11. The Ute Park Subdivision P.U.D. dedicated an easement to the City of Aspen for the nordic trail as shown on the final plat. 93172 R2 4/8/94 23280 STATE HIGHWAY 82 P O. BOX 1640 BASALT, COLOBACDO 81621 [303] 927-3167 APR 17 '95 06:56 THEODORE K GUY ASSOC PC A P. 1 : ./ f THEODORE K GUY ASSOCIATES PC ; ARCHITECTS AND STRUCTURAL ENGINEERS 4, PHONE: 303-927-3167 FACSIMILE: 303-927-4813 DATE: 4-j'-7 '49 TIME.. ~,00 &7*71 To: Â£0Â»KEf#1,*700~'L COMPANY: Aspeâ€žlai-ki k *84. ' PROJECT: 1/U i M HYÂ»1.QÂ»- ; FACSIMILE #: 90' 5/9 7 TELEPHONE #: FROM: 0% ed#M iwo TOTAL NUMBER OF PAGES (INCLUDING COVER PAGE) ~ MESSAGE: Awd.- 3*t / 4 2 09 2 jUP. 04,04 ~5 Â£42 4-6& Â¥8 4104 RS ~ ,AÂ¥*;e-1- 44 86(*ty whAJ Ne,/ARM, c(Wed- 4/1#Mr - )0*4'L u -lla B WAA U rv411\B no we di<uused at k. r stizE nue ce. A hive flbt (9 1 Â»11 -ta ce,+rÂ»t XTROMkritc k. IF YOU DO NOT RECEIVE ALL OF THE PAGES, PLEASE CALL -Â£21. AS SOON AS , POSSIBLE. irl \ \J 17 1 4. 0 -02\ 2 3 Â¢54 1 .4 L 1-~~ ((f-4 ./+ 7 /044 .1 -O 9,1/ '26 -4 5/ 4 1/A 6Â« / 1 89 (4 -4697 l<~ (C-Â·-j ~t-yfut 4 ~ 64,10- 34< -ted. en..1- , P 'Ull , . - 7, .f -, 3-4 --232-19,25:Jt- '--*-,~*O A LI \ \ Â· 1 1-Cl= 41' - 1.CAR- ' . .. iii 0- 0 925: 9. 031 rl g .r. 1-1 1 , 1. il - 1 1 - 1 74 :I . ' 209,â€¢ 2,9 1 1 / 4=-* 4 i -I I. F 1 10.00'. 1 1 3 .11 1- 9.-'Lf..t-1 li- - 1 .1 -/ -It725-4-- FEI.- mi C(ba 0 r -- - Â· T E,LOG, Â· 1 - -- A , M la P-7- 1 14/ - J -as LS' i ~.f / 1 1 mÂ· I i , , A -6 - .. IN,9/ rk.Â« , 2096.42 1" 7,1M FBE . 1 /ti..Â£Â£4 r. 1 l-1 l,r Iii, : - 7 - / 11 . -rw " 11 , ZE-IC i . , - . ec . ' 1 1-=241~~' f t:~ i 1 - - - (63 2'4. â€¢ AemEN N t:1*EU 1 11,1- - 0 A ..i. ....9./ . . -=c-;Lots>Â·dal-L. ' - i -~1 -r([ r*Le=,8-tu=Wc .4 7 / -4 ..1 . r--i 9. - 1-' . 2 %220 2:L--r - 7/TA <LJL 2,0 ' 0/,1 . =-4 . Ps-'. 1.- . . . 41 1 0 0 / 1Â»71'45 GReS S22â‚¬ W , -'Z>,92- Â«m m. Lk \-, Â· >Â»,e:=e2.47 '/ , \ /.__1 - -* . 1- 0- i ,. . I. -1 1 \04. I . 1.. - 11 --L --- --â‚¬u_ - . \ ..1 --- - 1 1 . Ill!. A- ./. # 8*tioe, eou . 1.1, 1 1 KEYAW*0 WAU. A*,ee : A SITE PLAN AS PROPOSED 82%6#69*%*DAy X IQEr/,INING, toALL 0 1Â· /10Â·-0- : THEODORE 1< GUÂ¥ ASSOCIATES PC 2 ORAY.IN : 1]F . FHINNERMAN RESIDENCE ARCHITECTSÂ· AMD STRUCTU RAL ENdINERS LOT 2 Â· Â· CHECKED : P.O. BOX 1640 0 ~ UTE PARK SUBDTVISION 23230 STATE H16HriAÂ¥ 82 - ~FEN. 00 BASALT, COLORADO 816.21 003, â‚¬27-6187 - issuED 4/10/96 - APR 17 '95 06:56 THEODORE K GUY,ASSgC A --6-222Â» 1r - A i- 1-C= /1 f 6-9 - 1 / M.107 -1-1 - . -; 8 -=*. C -0 9 7.2 .- 5 19 2 ' i ... I. 1=ev 43~ vâ‚¬,d'Zk Jr 170 i o '2.47.5,1>~ --- . I. -- -7-1-)- g~ rÂ· =5.-2*ee=i % -- - 1.GÂ»W ,4 Â·mr:as:, l ,- '1 - If -- .-C-- I - - JAIL 0 1 - / i t#Sr#04/eREâ‚¬i:-36 Ph/fm#*EP 01 ArÂ£9766 0/:elâ€¢a WALLS. 3,Â·- tiovm 17187,6 A.&4 5(APE 10}14% / M?Al,41AINEP *r (.ANWJUWASP GINT:L 5,0)4& UÂ£ut,Zes *ut.PÂ£*41. lope . 5 # 551- 12 , r*Â£ Ai : ,] 31 J Ai APR 17 '95 06:57 THEODORE K GUY ASSOC PC A P.3 -1 1 '1 . -0- --M.--(0. -Â·~.n- 1 . j -L - 1 2 1 1 . il' 12 , 1. 0 - R 1:44 flil ill fptiÂ» 1 lug.4 44 .. 0 Ill - 1 1, 4.& 1 1 . 1 ,Â·j 1113 ., 1 Ul_ . . El .... . ... 6 -4 . /1 6 . 0 -44 6<' 1Â· , - 1 1 11.... _-2.2 1 1 , nnrr,Arrl~1'rJI -- --'11 A ~. . I w.1-2-144#1194 1 . lili , [44 1 v \\ A= 0 9 g 2*11 1/ (Â«21 - 1 1 1 8%,t- J.. 71 . J * 1-El i --,- .4-, .1 r rn x It .1 1 ...In , 1. i .c i - . -4 It *r #& 1 6 ' a <2% i* 1 33 -= - -- -z;7411 9 0 8 it; C===-1-,=5~-~5r: 1 / 1% 70 0 *F ie f I. 1 1 . *IP- -)3.) 1 /44 %11 \ f m.- 4- 9- 4.r . 7 â‚¬)5--71 FUR Ct, , \ 0 - ' I. W' }- 0 ----Alit /17-=-1 i 91-3 . Eg )1Â· r---/ FFLA r I . - 1 AÂ·T) - -1 1 r. -4 +11 191) -rrr rAK-17 1..1=1- 111 4. 3., L .\. 1/0 1.-1.1-lilli'.4/ . , 4-rt- 1 .grf!,In' -1-1$ 1 -44/ ./il 4 . I Il r -Â·.--A.21:. 11:21*2 1 , 1 -r . J '11 , 1. . 8 .1, fl <.1 .LI- , t. 9 %.1 1. a 1 \ ' t vt ~ :<i' :4;4 -Â· 11*'_ j Â·,Â·-Â·,-11,& Itili-.- 4 -924! Illl 1 ....1............. .. . . - 1 1-2 /10 , 0 hi-j < 4 ... -6 Mu-1*1 43Â§ '' 1 1 y .- N.= , 81 - Â· 1 . 8 1 e ~ 'R? Â· ,:iI ~ ?,Â£Â·~-i~~*..Â·,; ,:.:,tÂ»r t./ -. p F. ~ j ~~ ~ ~ ; 70 >r *rl. 6 ..1/1,-- I .1 0 4.Â·) - 16 0 *+ F ; 4 i.00 -thi G i.t ,;44 ,, <t- 1 jt \ 22 i... 1 =.1 4}\ O 43 r lt-3 ~Â· A F ; ~r r' Â· y 14' . 1<Â·'Rit:Ii.RÂ·t f~/~O'L-/ fk,....Â· 98 4.14 X. ' 1 3 ir- 6 4 . ' r<,29' O 7 7 4 i. U. t. Â·4# m 8*~ Â·Â· IP :rf 1 y,Le , tlmlit J i t', ~ D. 4:4*% , 1 .. , ~Aji 4':,124': Â·Â· ~ :.. . 46 K f .111.1.11 ke e 1 , . aR..lk , 11~1 -' .4 ' , 1 j id .. '1 . Â«t**i; ikfÂ·:4 1 'Wl 4.4. ' Wiff< ~t'k--'Â· Â·1. , . . Ph Â¥ \ 11 6 - . , Â· 01 . . . \12//5,Â¥' 0 Â£1 81 1-1 1. S 56/01/9 Â£91Â£-LEÂ» (502) NDIGIA!(efS Xhf 14Â¥H'&12 NIM r ./:2â€¢ Se...3 T~, r ~ - 'L Â· LC" 1 U i ~t-,2.i.- iÂ· , 2 :r =4,0=, src,e L CC- BASE. 775'. 2 (=.,3*3'57(Ne i C.4,0 -- UNE CF BIST. dj@*B ~ BEV. 0046.0 - U. rru* . -r.- - - s k. 'tfive.: S. -+ 27/. . ' - I- .1 . =SH FET : 2 op z 35 # 93172 1 92 0- 91-1 3 1-0 .ad"NO I JACK fAu" fiâ€žA * DA~j:~~o~: 1 v,re'Aj/ ,â€¢CRIZOâ€¢TAL IAL.1 4-06 -791,01. 9,4(14 il-XTURE. Prr ..AR,52 V./7(AL. 2 ~ 2- I - 2,4 KI. VE.7.C..6 . 5Â·/ - 1 -â€¢"52 ~OMLIZMTAL_ 1 12 I - i T ,2 MASCNRY VEMEER 1 3.AL- ..C 1-21./. i 3/ . i<kx. -- /â‚¬00 50>16. ( 3 5/8- EXPEURE) 77. - 6/46 COM/el TX:M. 777'. UN O. L 1 ==Le /// 1 ,-1-=RZ 94 14 *"=243*/ - A El 5-JT SHAKE â€¢<SCM.46 7, CL===Il- 43.*-4 / N.-2 1 4 //CRl \ C Ari--71-3 1-7:Kn rri='3 11-i-7 Nk .\ . ~1 -~~] r! 9-4 -4 526. â€¢ ehel-Â£ 940'3. C :/2- Ex:,CeuRE,, p. 1 , 1 0Â« FIE-41 2-EF= 4- =L- LCM- 0 ~ 7, -L..ASTÂ·Eft ./ 1 1 - L-. h-â‚¬71 Nek j 4,-/ t -*. 1 V 7 r. rl| \ ' 1 -/ â€¢ mA - .Â»b,l. 4 -%Â·1.1, E Fll >11. // //1/9, 41 \Â»\ -i... In : Â·Prp. !1 ,!91' FiA KIZE H & /1-+ I 1' <.- ' PLASHING 111=LIt Â»-Â«;,â‚¬,20' 1 111 \<Av442340\.1 IF 1 11'.7 ~ ~ 4-t-tb /-- Y : h . ts..\ ~ /- .~IZOÂ»"~Â»C -2Â«. \6- *zÂ¢*4~Liâ€¢1*-f .- I. I--I'. . A 7 F".7-14*STEZ. J '- &4+2' P 32Â· 'AL-22* Ne:=93:~ / / 1.1 1*~rr-@r/,44=Zy///f''n.IÂ» "*Â§3 244*P~.'..44 F-- Â°L-52â‚¬M 2 1 =0!/4907Â»13 r h.--72-1 Â«: Â» <ST-9 97 M.0.<DA'.t.,i. /7,-4 1 UÂ»41 t 2.' >Ok *.25'i.f - - 0' -LrVING /1 - ff i , . 33.Â«.4. iÂ»V El ' | | ' 3 4Â·Â·Â¥ 4, 0/ â€¢ -U ; .0 -- : C- 70!CK) eTCHE ;WKLM :54 F 44Â£. 9.11Â»ty,/ 3.1,4 .%MXTU-352,7rF'. 1 ~| / E prÂ·?Ki~ 'Â· ,.;.,~'~.,~t - 1,4...ff 11 - C 4 /iff),l Â£~Sk':Pd,4-r1<6*1bi 'C- *.41 1â€¢81/..i,r:'12' 1,rl . 2 (2- -=ICK; 91-CNE - 4.91, If, V- 1 . 4 - " ' =-O- c.=SBEL ~ 7. F'L--ecf!.4 :. -43.i Â·i-:*4L-c Â·-i.-<#Itd Â¥9 I - 1 1.6 -4,10 i.,21.7 2.46;72 --------- 7 - W. r -. : 121~. 542* TAMi"-#r-- - - -9 '.,t- 4*336. 44/Wi 4-,9 - SIMULATED O 4/glp/N . - 844#*/48- â€¢ * 4â€ž..... ?tY*bdie ,!*AFÂ·â€¢U~,244 Â· . #11 4 - -- ' T 1 -4- -2* 4 ,.: - . h.. Ift,Y- t*.4 r-KE,.Â·*;1 .lp#1- +T - ~~~ 16 r' 9,#, -1~4-*Airs '9.2./.:rw- .t- /&11~4/9/7 ~61 , 1 #57 : AJA132 - f /2-~#33~. 1 1- L. - '1 '/~ r-4 - 71- EAST ELEVATION AS PROPOSED /12â€ž' 0 1/6" /1'-0' -al. 4-3Â¥104= k ~ r ... . THEODORE K eUY ASSOCIATES PC DRAPNN : 12 MINNERMAN RESIDENCE BHEET : ARCHITECTS AND STRUCTURAL ENOINEERS LOT 2 all CHECKED : P.O. BOX 1640 UTE PARK SUBDIVISION 'v#%13 BOF 5 23250 STATE HleHMAY 32 ASPEN, CO BASALT, COLORADO 01621 (303) 927-3167 JOB # 93172 ISSUED 2-9-95 2[1 1 _.LL J . 9 / 4 E STONE 12 //4 /ffÂ®%Â« < t- 57IaNE lili i. 1 5 C . 1 1 1 _' \24<T FNANED SIDING , 4/~b / M / /4 hot N 1 111 1 1 . , 12 1/ \ - \ le < ---- ~ 12 //S \ 4*IBBL /\ --La / 0%, / M 1 1- %. I // 1441 1 1 1 1 ' I \ / /1 1 1 i / 1 , 1, 11, i i 1 --1-1 , 1 P========, 7==== , ' 1 / 1 . C 1 12 \ 1/ _ . . 0-1. 16 I . 2 4 3 -1 -----1 1 la- j 1, 0----- / -0-- vt,0 i 1-1. 5 -- --9 --! DER TONÂ£ 1 .0 W ONE --i= . -= -- - -- ==,1-'---71 r-- 4&064/ n +71 dr. I I .-Il-i- ill-* -Il-li --0-4 ./1 ------ .....4 ---- .1-__-1.j=-2- I 'F 7 ---- . 1 11 1 p - 1 '9 ' <P-0- - IF \ 1 ~72 2 - STONE 1 1 ' ' ~<'tr~7- AMNED SIOING 1 1; [FI] 1 -r 1.-1 1 l - -Trl ASSOCIATE THEODORE 12 ARCHITECTS AN: LL FLASHING STRUCTUF~AL. ENc Â®7~dil-4, 1 - F.O. BOX 1640 23250 Hy*f. 82 -- BASALT, COLOÂ»CO )9--. ~ 6 PLY - LOF-1- * FAX (303) 921-48 13 PHONE (303) 92-1-316 , / 1 ill \ / 1 1 ' 1 4 , r=== , I 1 / 1 I 1 12 %\ ~ . ' /1 , 1 YYANED SIDING i STONE Â«05 i T. PLY-LMNe ~ /4 7 - --- AUG 30 / r- LINE OF EXISTING GRADE BULLD' 6 -0- -- -- -I-I-*71 Ir---I--1 ,-- ~ BOULDER RETAININe FYALL AT INSPECT. '1 STREET OMITTED FOR CLARITY 19"EN/P< / \ 1 \ / 11- i 399Â»R, - 11 1 : 1. 1 ........ P .3/ , 1 1 - - :1 f=61,4421rrk 1 .. 0 .< 04*--RUMT&/1 T. SLAB-PLAYRM ~ - ij<*C GE#el ; Avt 1 1 1 LNE OF FINISH GRADE Â»ED ARCE.5' JI 4 F- ARTHUR I. MEARS, P.E., INC. Natural Hazards Consultants 222 Ea* Gothic Ave. Gunnison, Colorado 81230 303 - 641Â·3236 4 January 11,199 Mr. Stan Mathis Theodore K. Guy Associates, P.C. P.O. Box 1640 Basalt, CO 81621 Dear Mr. Mathis: I completed a site inspection of the building sites on Lots 2 and 3, Ute Park Subdivision on January 6. Portions of both building envelopes are within range of avalanches, as you know. The western portion of both envelopes are most severely exposed; avalanche exposure and avalanche loads decrease in an easterly direction. I offer the following suggestions which should aid in the preliminary design process. a. Design the south side of both buildings for avalanche loads. Loads have not been determined but will probably be in the range of 150 - 400 lbs/fti These load magnitudes can be reduced if the exposed uphill sides of buildings deflect avalanches through small angles. Ramp roofs facing the avalanche direction are ideal and recommended. b. Ideally, windows and doors should be avoided on the uphill building surfaces facing avalanches. If doors and windows are planned on these surfaces, they must also be designed for avalanche impact. Small, reinforced glass spans can be designed for avalanche loads. Avalanches will flow through the forest in the "unconditional" zone and will probably carry small tree limbs in the flow during the extreme conditions that must be designed for. c. Eliminate structures such as decks and patios that will concentrate activities oIl the uphill (south-facing) sides of buildings where people will be exposed to avalanches. My loading analysis can be completed after I receive plan and elevation views of the proposed buildings. Please contact me if you have questions. Sincerely, 6911/GA j . 61 mod Arthur I. Mears, P.E. Avalanche-control engineer j Mass Wanting â€¢ Aoalanchts â€¢ Avalanche Contml Enginee,ing ARTHUR I. MEARS, P.E., INC. Namral Hazards Consultants 222 East Gothic Ave. Cunnison. Colorado 81230 303 - 641.3236 November 1, 1991 Mr. Jim Martin , Aspen Properties 215 South Monarch Aspen, CO 81611 Dear Jim: I have reviewed the final site development plan for the Ute Park Subdivision. This plan is undated but I refer to the version sent to me on October 28. The following comments refer to that plan and to issues discussed during my site visit of October 23. a. Building envelopes on Lots 2 and 3 are located - outside the "Red, " or high hazard avalanche zones. b. Portions of the building envelopes on Lots 2 and 3 are within the " or moderate-hazard avalanche " Blue, zone, however building within the blue zone will require a conditional use permit, as indicated on the plan. Structures in the blue zone will require site- specific design for avalanche forces. c. The building envelop on Lot 1 is located within both "Red" and "Blue" avalanche zones and is partially outside of avalanche zones. This building must be specially designed to stop avalanches at the uphill end, thus modifying the Red zone and preventing avalanches from reaching Lot 4. Such design is technically feasible, but design specifications have not been developed. d. The access road to the development passes through , the "Ute Trail" avalanche path. Portions of the access road will probably be reached by avalanches every 5 to 10 years, approximately. Hazard to road users will be small because traffic is light. Please contact me if you have any additional questions. li Sincerely, Arthur I. Mears, P.E. Avalanche-control engineer CC: Tom Stevens .a Mass Wasting â€¢ Al>clanches â€¢ Aoalanche Control Engineering b 1 9 . . 4-140.4.2;., 2 h 7, 0. - I. .. , 4' ' ~Â· 6 t . 4..... A. . 4 9- .t I A ' 4 i - E U THEODORE K GUY ASSOCIATES PC m\TEOTS AND STRUCTURAL ENGINEERS .43 g p.ago,<1640 25:BO H,Yr. 82 v ....1 M.- 625â‚¬L .--* .fl- 3,64-T, COLOR,DO .-- 81621 ~ mos) 427-316-1 , E 1 - FAX (SOS) 421-460 *-- 1 . .r --H-44'P<- â€¢ - - Â»Ar#f- 1 1 < 6000,6 t.*=5==* 4 1 It ~ NAT, 0*,De, -rfe /- r- Lible oF- ALIST. M; MetÂ¥22231 Â· 1 1 1 1 N' 60â€¢54.6 1 1 1 1 8 4 Fi}+1* 2- 2060.0 - -- Â·- Â· -- - - Â· T 1 11 111 1 " .L.W i iNor- 1 4 ., 1 -1 0044.0 4-- -0~~- ---4-'L_lb* 4-,1.-4-4.--1.r-â‚¬kÂ£-- tut- C.LILGF NIVE 1~Â· f Ve =- \' -O " 1 .-- PAIR 8.8.1 9fzz/EME 41Â£-P.#Nutil @699*MII #M/31*_ t**187.28"-844 ------------- ------------- -- --- -- - --- - I./.--1.I- -- - /24 92 Â»2- -41 //// 28 -a Y.liNNe3*LM.44 RESIDENCE 1, - 44*r - 1-=24 49*61 _9 m.1 :&7 -- LOT 2 -- -/ / UTE PARK SUBDIVISION / ASPEN, 00 8000. 6 - 'ft .1 -.- 1. f.1 -96 M, Re; 440 +01 .-I , 1 -. . 1.....4 + - -lift- 1~-7, 2 -d---- mr-=- -=U- i '0 : i i gue#he JOB â€¢: 48172 ORAFÂ»1: Â¢1**4 11 1 5060.0 M-FY/* 2- CHERACED: Â»'*4 FRNTEOI 6/'27/14 4@ . L Â· SH~I_IlILEE ELEVATION 2066.0 8031.6 fle.' 1459- 11229TO4 AS /0 - 1 1. 4. 4.. , -b 42:/Ntljilrr ,8 7 1 -â€¢ 1,=cooME K -pr Meocâ€¢Tes Fc , 12.:4.rute -rt, 1 . 4 r, 'Wiv#/1,â€¢ ZE' -. * M~.P~~i-/~I 18 '94 13:40 THEODORE K GUY ASSOC PC A P.1 THEODORE K GUY.ASSOCIATES PC ARCHITECTS & STRUCTURAL ENGINEERS ' PHONE: 927-3167 FACSIMILE: 927-4813 DATE: ~47>43 -Wl _T\ME: _..~ '/ ~-0" TO:. /5)917 (730/UÂ»t COMPANY: 8'*imtÂ¥Â« A-Mt .5 PROJECT: /\(#*10 AA+71 f&"Kt/M U. FACSIMILE #:_221-Â· SW[*-1---_TELEPHONE #: f"ROM: /'~/3~,gGZkÂ»,/ >20 11 lili. 11- TOTAL lN~BER Of PAGEN (INCLUDING~0~112~G~*~1~RY,&0( f MESSAGE: /~ A Â»bal jok&(91- _:r p~;d5331%20~J*Ztflk(%24 * te. 61NU Nal Fwani .<9==f,â€¢1 P'161 â€¢97 vi / IF YOU DO NOT RECEIVE ALL OF TI iE PAGES, PLEASE CALL Â«'A-S SOON-AS POSSIBLE. .- OCT 18 '94 13:40 THEODORE K GUY ASSCC PC A P. 2 OCT 18 '94 08:56 Trâ‚¬0- P.2 Post*t ' brand fax tansmntal memo 7671 , of page, 4 / ' Nt[JUCW WU/.trm.upe :mÂ¢(*A #226:-4 Ce. V , Gapt. Phorte b Ottob. 1 14 1 994 .FRk. * FBI-y . : Mr. Ed Van Wanven CIty of Aspen Ara *s)â€¢11 420 E. Ho,~dns A-ue _ As#44 N 81811 - RE. N.th-en Residence Ute Park amarisicÂ», Lot 3 i *00 St*JECT: Fir* DÂ®<whilit A=432 Eastmeot - Conitions wot Ape'.4% -This letter Ral se,ve as gur ac~,ova,dger:=nt *nd accapt.ted ot yow dema,unents ooliatic:* of approwt M wo of * 13 #cot 14#de po,tkn of our dnveway . art acca,gs -Jr:mmt fer a *re truck ttanarÂ©und M b OUr u,Â·*daÂ¢*2%#ng thst thi c~h,wÂ«y 570 85 Bbliwn m %*0 @tttached dna"Ag titted 'Ue Pant Subd,Asion Locs 283 Fing Dip,rtment Accass Ems-er:t Man, *ed 10/12/54 wm be a4equate for tl*nafound cae in I,Â»1 0, the access eiase,11211* incmented w the recordod am; PUD 0~ Phm, dated 2/12/93. ~ We ./Me to th' conc#tions 2% */O/2 1) 7},e *EW,â€¢Ry #ardi he â€¢1~41 W olÂ»Ductiâ‚¬*15 42 16# tkiwe. /Ad/Au but not *@ted te *tructu,es, gates, bwca:i, ba,Fic~des tid#w oban=1002. 2) Snow remaval shaa occur pr~pÂ® to â€¢-um de*r ~01:55 te th. MveW# I 3) Al conatoes,re b.-g on the property. 4) No whlcutgr kne tenn Â·*sentee) parking v,0 be demutted in the access 14:**nient pation of the *ivew,0 i Â· 5) A,Ky Vehkbe parked 18 the 3001/4 eamena/m pen*n d thâ€¢ 6**way - be moved m the event o, Am 'mous"mfy ar at tle râ„¢Jest of Ehe FIre Ma,/hal. 6) Vali# shal not be ped*d in the =9'3 4"excâ€¢ peâ€¢don of the *1-gy m â€¢uch * mainw as to Mnd, the. tum*#cund wnt,able- F.FBAyof"A Q A p*TOY 1 1 A=Ll- ' All --90.2Â« / *4uÂ»o U- 1//1,1-1/ 93145 US ce: m=kre Il Guy A~0(=tes, P.C -*We 11 . OCT 18 ' 94 08: 56 THEODORE K GUY ASSOC PC A P.2 October 18, 1994 OCT 26891 ' ~ Mr. Ed Van Walraven City of Aspen Fire Mai'shal 420 E. Hopldns Avenue Aspen, Colorado 81611 RE: Nathanson Residence Ute Park Subdivision, Lot 3 Aspen, CO SUBJECT: Fire Depanment Access Easement - Conditions of Approval Dear Ed: This letter will serve as our acknowledgement and acceptance of your departments conditions of approval for use of a 13 foot wide portion of our driveway as an access easement for a fire truck turnaround. It is our undefstanding that the driveway area as showl orr the attached drawing titled "Ute Park Subdivision Lots 2&3 fire Department Access Easement Plan, dated 10/12/94 will be adequate for turnaround use in lieu of the access easement indicated on the recorded Final PUD Development Plan, dated 2/1 El/93. We agree to the conditions as follows: 1) The driveway shall be dear of obstructions at all times, including but not limited to structures, gates, fences, barricades or other obstructions. 2) Snow removal shall occur promptly to ensure clear access to the driveway. 3) All conditions are binding on the property. 4) No vehicular long term (absentee) parking Mil be permitted in the access easement portion of the driveway. 5) Any vehicle parked in the access easement portion of the driveway will be moved in the event of an emergency or at the request of the Fire Maahal. 6) Vehicles shall not be parked in the access easement portion of the *iveway in such a manner as to render the turnaround unusable. Sincepy--youBI) f A ~/fjk~ 991/'-%;tit.4-0~_ 04-ff-j-i\01-Â»U Gary Nath n Unda Nathanson 93145 L28 ec: Theodore K. Guy Associates, P.C. enclosure 375527 B-764 P-940 10/20/94 08:30A PG 1 OF 2 REC DOC SILVIA DAVIS PITKIN COUNTY CLERK & RECORDER 10.00 1- A 131â‚¬831-72 Cove /9,Â¥VCS. 0 / 1 1 41Â¥20,ft / / ). M x rAfFhz #CESS l LL loT 1 1 / 9366*MENT (201 33.099 1 Url 1 TO BE ASWOOMEP 1 It, 1 11 1 0 ..L .4/ i i !7 . 1 I . 1 Al"2% --- ----- --1 /94 4<255--7 0 : baÂ»Â»>t ~ g?356,%1 ENT 1 t r l?4, h,0, , 4~ - r -. - 1 T ~* casr AM. T-4 . 1 .0 --I --I --r/' 612â‚¬F ' eu:76. a "-----6 1 -- 1 ey,8Â£94 *CNEE' AlÂ«EA 1 441, fleftsâ‚¬* CKIYEA | III 1' 1 '7' Â· 13' . Acce,GS EAJer,\EAT 1 ' 4,\- 13/6 h 01 /49>6 4, 1 C , 10 MecM,HM~.T'. f \ 1 b3 93 No 92/956,'EMT AST*ACT]or~ ON 11' Werti OF ORJYEWNÂ¥ LoT 3 1 -AMe: 42 1 1 -----4 - 1 D--1 - 1-.1 \7- \39% UTa Fh,2.1< flizEEP/vi sloti 9- LOTS 24 3 Yli 49 176 152 Br7F 'trtj/525-9Â»MevIEQi 1"=30/ 10/12/14- Slfi 4i 10/20/94 08:30A PG 2 r OCT 14 '94 08: 15 THEODORE K GUY ASSOC PGOY ASSOCIATES PC P. 1 i ncuuu/Tt- 1\ ARCHITECTS & STRUCTURAL ENGINEERS ' PI-IONE: 927-3167 FACSIMILE: 927-4813 DATE: 1014* TIME:4~~,/O TO: .Kiâ€¢<latly*fk, COMP ANY-- /~9&01 ,/~~~#1 ~~*,1,1/>77 1 PROJECT: ,/~77~2:?ft:Pr 42*Mn'COMâ‚¬9 , FACSIMILE #' .~10' Fâ‚¬02------_TELEPHONE #: FROM (344-!-far# i Fle - TOTAL NUMBER OF PAGES (IN5LUDING COVER PAGE) 2 MESSAGE: (11*rk#@Al,d'Vvt. (21 113 Mvu*R Arrtss aae,â„¢t Flw jo//2.19 + *t.)1-1 ~fal Fl,ft f MOK @PIC:YoftdtY~@*li- Ato I O' P . 0.de ypria vl r un 29+ENALivrt NAA L '5Â»' Widtk * dF ift - Slour -*10++1-? IF YOU DO NOT RECEIVE ALL OF TIIE PAGES, PLEASE CALL AS SOON AS POSSIBLE. Cc . Gutok- Alk - 242&; M.QÂ®r i Pl~. OCT 14 '94 08:15 THEODORE K GUY ASSOC PC A M/1071* A -9al** 9313& Med AFF,1. /UNE OF 0 -t 1 8*- 1 '01Â¥Elon 1 / ). ry Â»AfFM AdES , 1 L 07 1 1 / Ementefir (mk 33Â·059 1 LoT 2 . 1 \ il 1 1 / 17 -1 1 . I gato Bp/461:5--7 0 : kNINW -*-- ---1 0.56MENT 1 0 L22*7- - 14 lÂ¥Â»Â°', 1 5, 1 . . Acua BÂ£*p j . _ 1 - rb,Ers. ' 8Â£06. . 11 .0. - 1 Git{Ele?a- I. .- -20 - ~6-1 M.__-#hagOAFEA 8%fbsee AKIYEA ~ ' p I~! /7' , la, 4 ACâ‚¬245 SUE,MEMT 1 /,gx- WH{V. 4 &Â¥Ce*0,~,T~-4 C : LO74 1 -A071: NO Eate#EAT *17%,trlot~ 1 e. 1 ON M' AMPTH OF Â£Â¥2/YEWA?Â¥~~ LOT 3 OE 1/42 la : L -- -------*--I--4 \ f 90 + & . 16 0,1/Â·tf 1 -6 -0 p. . -1 ./ - - 444 \-=A L./ \V \, \3: Lha FAÂ« 9/19Â£2/Vi SION \10 Lans 243 ~ â‚¬,26 t:33rl: ACCESS, BEE,y:ErtrfE,44! iN=30/ to/12/94- 5Â¢1 41 01 NE,- -. -. .I 4 4%' , .,4. - I- On r 'Dlu 199 3130 fm LÂ£142 lol219Â¥ U) 1 AMâ‚¬0 VAcivt 1~25 j /24<,2 CITY OF ASPEN ~ PITKIN COUNTY 1 CORRECTION NOTICE 24 STOP WORK ORDER Job Located at Lot 1 lib ~04-Â«blu UL I have this day inspected this structu AUU Mâ‚¬&â‚¬546to) and have found the following violationsVT City, County and/or Colorado State laws governing same: Â· (1./C-/93+41 r- F u L,L/// P'l...A-/ V- r - -â€¢J Â£ Â£ 04 93Â£6 \144- fdo#djit + 1 4- I 1 + e. wl,01 f EN.LJ 7(~314-~RA C+~ A tx4-nu E f ) 3/Ze Respond By \ 0~-1-(/~>\ 9 __Photos Taken: Yes O No O You are hereby notified that no more work may be done upon the premises until the above violations are corrected. If you do not communicate with this office by the above date, this matter will be referred to the appropriate authorities for enforcement. Failure to correct the violations may subject you to a civil suit for an injunction, or a fine or both; or to misdemeanor criminal prosecution, which upon conviction may carry a sentence of fine or imprisonment, or both. to D-0 lit -9 i,? Q tbru 1 20.~ Date City/County Official U Building Department Phone: 920-5440 ~PLPIanning/Zoning Department Phone: 920-5090 DO NOT REMOVE THIS TAG CITY OF ASPEN PITKIN COUNTY O CORRECTION NOTICE [ZE STOP WORK ORDER Job Located at 4 1 kix ~094#ujÂ·L l have this day inspected this structufe UU %61(9=) and have found the following violations\6f City, County and/or Colorado State laws governing same: C - ~/7 3-4 - Â»f::-3- 2Â»-485-771â„¢ / 2*(/ 4/ \ A A #' A.A 1 1 /*1*Fir CJEiÂ»e CAL,44- 160634.M . fEe .. gU 3.4 + / ) a/Ze Respond By \~ C ,~ -~> 01 /\ 1 < Photos Taken: Yes O No O You are hereby notified that no more work may be done upon the premises until the above violations are corrected. If you do not communicate with this office by the above date, this matter will be t : referred to the appropriate authorities for enforcement. Failure to correct the violations may subject you to a civil suit for an injunction, or a fine or both; or to misdemeanor criminal prosecution, which upon 2 conviction may carry a sentence of fine or imprisonment, or both. ill)014'i 8 uÂ¢ 0 \ VU.1 2 - '~ .4 Date City/County Official J .. U Building Department Phone: 920-5440 ,Â»Planning/Zoning Department Phone: 920-5090 1 DO NOT REMOVE THIS TAG A RESOLUTION OF THE ASPEN PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION FOR THE APPROVAL OF 8040 GREENLINE REVIEW FOR THE WINNERMAN RESIDENCE LOCATED ON LOT 2 OF THE UTE PARK SUBDIVISION AT THE EAST END OF UTE AVENUE Resolution 94-#~ WHEREAS, Section 24-7-503 of the Aspen Municipal Code requires Planning and Zoning Commission approval of all development within 100 feet of the 8,040 foot elevation line; and WHEREAS, Larry Winnerman submitted an application to the Planning Office for 8040 Greenline review of his proposed residence; and WHEREAS, referral comments were received from the Engineering Department and the Parks Department; and WHEREAS, the site contains red and blue avalanche hazard areas as identified by consultant Art Mears, and the platted building envelope established a conditional building area and an unconditional building area based on the avalanche concerns; and WHEREAS, in consideration of the proposal, a site inspection, and referral comments, the Planning Office recommended approval with conditions; and WHEREAS, at a regular meeting held on June 21, 1994 the Planning and Zoning Commission reviewed the project pursuant to the criteria of Section 24-7-503, and voted 5-2 to approve the Winnerman 8040 Greenline review with thirteen conditions amended from staff's recommendation; and WHEREAS, the Commission also approved by 7-0 votes two additional motions: 1) to direct staff to notify the Nordic Council that the trail cut on Lot 2 (Ute Park Subdivision) is a violation of the 8040 Greenline regulations, and the Council must submit an ~~application for 8040 Review within 30 days of notice; and -*) to direct staff to have on-going inspections of the Winnerman project by appropriate City departments. NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED BY THE ASPEN PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION that it grants approval for the Winnerman 8040 Greenline Review for a residence of 4,852 s.f. (plus 540 s.f. garage and 774 s.f. deck) as represented by the application subject to the following conditions: ( ~-1-) ~ Run-off from the site during construction must be prevented \ - by detention ponds, hay bales, or similar methods to be 1 approved by the City Engineer prior to the issuance of any grading or building permits. 2) The lowest level of the structure on the north (west) side shall not be excavated or exposed except for minimal egress windows which may be required for bedrooms per the Building Code. ~ Excavation shall occur from the "inside out" from the downhill l_/ side of the property. No equipment is permitted outside of the building envelope. ~) Prior to any grading or storage activity on the site, a sturdy, visible barricade shall be erected along the building envelope lines on the east, south and west to protect the existing grades and vegetation. 5) Only native vegetation species as typically found on this site shall be used for revegetation of disturbed soil along the east, south and west side of the residence. Any regraded or disturbed areas must be revegetated and mulched or matted immediately. 6) Avalanche warning signs as required by the subdivision must be erected prior to the issuance of any building permits. 7) A detailed landscape plan must be submitted to Planning and approved prior to the issuance of any building permits. 8) Prior to the issuance of any building permits, tree removal permits from the Parks Department are required for any tree 6"diameter or greater which will be removed or relocated. Application for tree removal permits must occur no less than two weeks prior to submittal for the building/excavation permits. 9) Colors shall tend to earth tones to make the building compatible with the hillside. 10) There shall be no future grading on the site without 8040 review. The open area to the west of the residence shall remain undisturbed except for necessary control of weed pests as specified by the 1990 Colorado Weed Management Act and Pitkin County Land Management Department. 11) The Fire Marshall shall sign off on building permits regarding fire access and building sprinklers (required for Lot 2 as a , condition of subdivision approval). j . 12) Landscaping shall be planted in front of the private entry driveway's retaining wall to reduce the visual impact of the wall. The landscaping plan which must be reviewed prior to 2 the issuance of any building permit shall show this landscape treatment. The landscape shall be installed upon completion of the wall when revegetation takes place. 13) All representations made by the applicant within the application or before the Planning and Zoning Commission shall be considered conditions of approval for this project. \-IlAM P lA- W. Bruce Kerr, Chairman Jan C*ney, Deputy ~ity Clerk 3 RESOLUTION OF THE ASPEN PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION FOR THE APPROVAL OF THE NATHANSON 8040 GREENLINE REVIEW FOR A SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENCE LOCATED ON LOT 3 OF THE UTE PARK SUBDIVISION Resolution No. 94- WHEREAS, Gary and Linda Nathanson submitted an application for 8040 Greenline Review to the Planning Office; and WHEREAS, the application was reviewed for referral comments by the Parks Department and the Engineering Department; and WHEREAS, based on the referral comments, Planning staff comments, and presentation by the project representatives, the Planning and Zoning Commission voted 5-2 in favor of the project with 15 conditions; and WHEREAS, the Commission also passed a motion directing staff to make on-going inspections during the construction process; and WHEREAS, the Commission passed another motion directing staff to contact the Nordic Council to require them to come before the Commission for 8040 Greenline Review for the trail which they cut through the Ute Park Subdivision. NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED by the Commission that it approves the Nathanson 8040 Greenline Review for the development of a single family residence subject to the following conditions: 1) Run-off from the site during construction must be prevented by detention ponds, hay bales, or similar methods to be approved by the City Engineer prior to the issuance of any grading or building permits. 2) Terracing of the ground shall (including any retaining walls) not extend beyond the line of the deck. 3) Excavation shall occur from the "inside out" from the uphill side of the property. No equipment is permitted outside of the building envelope. 4) Prior to any grading or storage activity on the site, a sturdy, visible barricade shall be erected along the building envelope lines, and no closer than 5 feet to the aspens at the northwest corner of the house, to protect the existing grades and vegetation. 5) The deck outside of the master bedroom shall be reduced in size to retain the mature aspens at the northwest corner of the house, in addition to replacing the at-risk trees caliper inch for caliper inch.. 1 jf 6) Only native vegetation species as typically found on this site shall be used for revegetation of disturbed soil along the east, south and west side of the residence. Any regraded or disturbed areas must be revegetated and mulched or matted immediately. 7) Avalanche warning signs as required by the subdivision must be erected prior to the issuance of any building permits. 8) A detailed landscape plan must be submitted to Planning and approved prior to the issuance of any building permits. 9) Prior to the issuance of any building permits, tree removal permits from the Parks Department are required for any tree 6"diameter or greater which will be removed or relocated. Submit for tree removal permits at least two weeks prior to submitting for building permit. 10) Colors shall tend to earth tones to make the building less visible on the hillside. 11) There shall be no future grading on the site without 8040 review. The open field to the west of the residence shall remain undisturbed except for necessary control of weed pests as specified by the 1990 Colorado Weed Management Act and Pitkin County Land Management Department. 12) The Fire Marshall shall sign off on building permits regarding fire access. 13) Landscaping shall be planted in front of the private entry driveway's retaining wall to reduce the visual impact of the wall. The landscaping plan which must be reviewed prior to the issuance of any building permit shall show this landscape treatment. The landscape shall be installed upon completion of the wall when revegetation takes place. 14) All representations made by the applicant within the application or before the Planning and Zoning Commission shall be considered conditions of approval for this project. APPROVED by the Commission at its regular meeting on June 21, 1994. W. Bruce Kerr, Chairman Jan Carney, Deputy City Clerk 2 40 / 000" t ./ 0dp 1, / f tortaITIONAL ;12 , N l .104Aa , - , // / / .1 .ij ..-7.- -7 '- -/ ' / I // i. -1,/ / , /1 1 1 - .//9/ // ./ / , 1 , I , 1 . 1 / /// /// / /1/ /-/ : .12 euu=,i,Â·-tar , .../. ..i....f//029//0/ / " *4 4',41~ ,0 . 1 Erife.LopER / *<y*--ia:* F:/*3/<4'7Ft ' ' / '' I / *1#.. t . , / - .-~ ili ,//1, / , , ' â€¢99 MANK 8480 Â®411 ' 61 Asfbl ''#*f#H' ' ~ F 3 f, 1 ; 1 :---fOsf-Â£ ; 13 4 1 abl /2, , / 4 5. Mit / 14#46fbA J-: : // . I 1 7 % *4'FAN 1..1 I -9 / 1 - - R,<Reâ‚¬eU 7"Mfw, I : ,/ .(94=115'' .4.101% 1-0-r 2 / 04)/25+166 , 1, 1 1 / / e // ./ 1 0 19 Fl - 901' Fig -, I t } 0 . . . / - *6.Fl.2 40 -1 I 1 , 0 w- / 1 04*14 - ' / '900 J \ '' L-- ....1// / / e- - , 0 I / I ..*. . ' 1 *L_ -- Ple-%2 1 / \ 01 - -- --___ .* 1 i - . i Brec~ll / / 2Â»04&2:Re , 1 1 - / 94.0 . / I * 5(AliQeR - '112"110 - --4<*1---Lil L'&-- fpal*INIrta -1 / kN..1. --- 1 P -7 %884(1// r \ j \ 9 \ j -/ Â·Â· .*-1-*I- ~=-*I--J0~ 1 9 - 11 1 l -1/ 1-/1----12Â· - --- -1 1 / -a=l ----4 ~ it I L.--- ' P A UE- Â» . 44,7. F?=E L Ir! Ihl Api' rere/(2?Rpolhla Fl.AN 111.!41.011 -69 i ' \ 00 O -4 0 r\) 1> 0 JIJ rn U) 1+ CONDITIONAL/ ~ ENVELOPE APPROX. LOCATIO 15' WIDE EXISTING TRAIL - LOT 2 1.000 ACRES + LOT 3 9. 4.- 49, 1 ; 19 4/' 8 1 04 6, \ 0 0 11- 1 4 0 \ / 1 / 4 1 1 WINNERMAN RESIDENCE 8040 GREENLINE APPLICATION FEBRUARY 14, 1994 THEODORE K GUY ASSOCIATES PC ARCHITECTS AND STRUCTURAL ENGINEERS P.O. BOX 1640 BASALT, COLORADO 81821 [303] 927-31 67 Table of Contents: Letter of Submittal Pre-Application Conference Summary Minimum Submission Requirements: Application Form Letter of Consent from Owners Legal Description Certificate of Title Vicinity Map Specific Submission Requirements: Conditional Use Application: Proposed Project Site Plan Proposed Elevations Proposed Site Section Description of Proposed Building Techniques Sheets: Al Site Plan A2 Proposed Elevations A3 Proposed Elevations A4 Proposed Section Appendix: Ordinance 18 (1992) February 14, 1994 Mary Lackner Aspen/Pitkin County Planning Department 130 S. Galena Aspen, CO 81 611 RE: Winnerman Residence Ms. Lackner: Herewith, please find the 8040 Greenline Application for the Winnerman Residence. This is in accordance with the preapplication conference Kim Johnson had with Ted Guy on December 15, 1993 and our conversation of January 31. It is submitted in coordination with the neighboring Nathanson Residence. Our project is for a single-family residence to be located on Lot 2, Ute Park Subdivision, Aspen, Colorado. Many of the Review Standards regarding geology, soils, drainage, air quality, utilities, roads and public space have already been addressed in the Ute Park P.U.D. approval as passed by the City of Aspen in Ordinance 18 (1992). Ordinance 18 placed the following restrictions on this lot: None, except those applicable to the subdivision, and - "Any hazardous or toxic soils must be stabilized and re-vegetated or removed to a site acceptable to the city." - "Prior to constructions, a fugitive dust control plan must be obtained from the Colorado Pollution Control Division and this office." These restrictions will be adhered at the when building permit applications are submitted and through construction. Further, erosion control measures such as construction of a holding pond, pinning hay bales and erosion channels to catch sediment will be utilized. The design of this home is similar to the neighboring Nathanson Residence in that the building will be set back into the hillside in order to minimize its appearance from the road and residents below, Color and materials will be modest and from the access above, the home will appear as a one story structure. This will be in keeping with the existing open character of the mountain. The access road has been and will be designed together with the home design and will require a minimum of driveway length and grading. Please notify us of our scheduled hearing date and time. Enclosed is a check for $1,074.00, four copies of this submittal, and one reduced copy, as requested. Robert Okazakl THEODORE K GUY ASSOCIATES PC 93172 8040 submission RKO:ipse CITY OF ASPEN \611% ' 2-APPLICATION CONFERENCE IMARY t PROJECT: )40 iÂ»Â·Airn 3040 APPLICANT'S REPRESENTATIVE: Taa:M * REPRESENTATIVE'S PHONE: - OWNER'S NAME: 9Â«-1-iaÂ«so A] SUMMARY 1. Type of Application: I 140 N -t l 2. Â·t Describe action/type o f development being requested: 4 Al (2 8 4 0 -D a 1 C 3. Areas is which Applicant has been requested to respond, types of reports requested: Policy Area/ Referral Agent Comments 5>t.4, f Kj A FO/004-/ _ 4. Review is: ~:gE_On~:~~3 (CC Only) (P&Z then to CC) 5. Public Hearing: (YES) (1* 0 C 6. Number of copies of the application to be submitted: J I Le 7. What fee was applicant requested to submit~90 2+ 55----- ~A~L (4 246- 299 P 8. Anticipated date of submission: A s. %Â£. = ~ (:~MMENTSgUNIQUE CONCERNS ~ 4* f 44 546>r. - Ths *det- 'p n-5 417. #Liz~$ tfsc,r 7 - 9 00 6 . - frm.pre_app ,ll 1 1 LAND USE APPLICATION tuket 1) Project blaine Winn an Residence 2) Project Location Lot 2, Ute Park Subdivision (indicate street. address, lot & block nunber, legal description where appropriate) 3) Present Zoning AH 4) Ict Size 1.000 ac 5) Applicant' s Name, Address & Fhane # Lawrence Winnerman 317 Park Avenue, Aspen, CO 81611 (303) 920-1851 6) Representative's Name, Address & Phone # Rob Okaziki, Theodore K Guy Associates PO Box 1640, Basalt, CO 81621 (303) 927-3167 7) Type of Application (please check all that apply): Conditional Use - Ccnzeptual SPA . - Conceptual Historic Dev. Special Review Final SPA Final Historic Dev. X 8040 Greenlire Ccnceptual FUD Minor Historic Dev. Stream Margin Final ED Historic Demolition Mouritain View Plane Subdivision Historic Designatian adaniniumization - Text/Map Amenchmt 00 Allatment Ict Split/Int Line ; GeS Doemption Adj 11St]IErt 8) Description of Existing Uses (number and type of existing. structures; approximate sq. ft.; number of bedroans; any previals approvals granted to tbe property). None 9) Description of Develogoent Awlication Single Family Residence 10) Have you attacherl the following? Y- Response to Attadmierrt 2, Mininlm Sulinission Contents Resixinse to AttadIment 3, Specific Sukinissian Contents k Response to Attachment 4, Review Starxlards for Your Application February 3 1993 City of Aspen 130 South Galena Street Aspen, Colorado 81611 To Whom It May Concern: This letter is to inform you that Win Win Enterprises authorizes Ted Guy Associates at 601 East Bleeker, Aspen Colorado to represent Win Win Enterprises in the 8040 Site review for Lot 2, Ute Park Subdivision, Plat Book 30 at Page 86 in Pitkin County. Sincerely yoursd Larry witi-Barman /1/Y I2-14-1994 11:55AM FROM Winnerman FAX(303)9201853 TO 9274813 P.02 . ASPEN/PITKIN PLANNING OFFICE Agreement for Pavment of City of Aspen Development Application Fees CITY op ASPEN (hereinafter CITY) and _ Win Win Enterprises (hereinafter APPLICANT) AGREE AS FOLLOWS: 1. APPLICANT has submitted to CITY an application for Winnerman Residence (hereinafter, 4'HE PROJECT). 2. APPLICANT understands and agrees that City of Aspen Ordinance No. 77 (Series of 1992) establishes a fbe structure for Planning Office applications and the payment of all processing fees is a condition precedent to a deterinknt 2-1 of application completeness. 3. APPLICANT and ClTY agree that because of the size, nature or scope of the proposed project, it is not possible at this time to ascertain the full extent of the costsÂ· involved in processing the application. APPLICANT and CITY further agree that ii is in the interest of the partia< te allow APPUCANT to make payment of an initial deposit and to thereafter permit additional costs to be billed to APPLICANT on a mondlly basis. APPLICANT agrees he will be benefited by retaining greater cash liquidity and will make additional payments upon notification by the CITY when they are necessary as costs are incurred. ClTY agrees it will be benefited through the greater certainty of recovering its full costs to process APPLICANT'S application. 4. CITY and APPUCANT further agree that it is impracticable for CITY staff to complete processing OI present sufficient information to the Planning Commission and/ar City Council to enable the Planning Commission and/or City Council to make legally required findings for project approval, unless cutrent billings are paid in full prior to decision. anâ€¢,11,11.:, 02-14-1994 11:58AM FR In' 141 Winnerman FAX(303)9201853 TO 9274813 P.01 . 5. Therefore, APPLICANT agrees that in consideration of the CITY's waiver of its right to collect full fees prfor to a determination of application completeness, APPLICANT shall pay an initial deposit in the amount of $ which is for , hours of Planning Office time, and if actual recorded costs exceed the initial deposit, APPLICANT shall pay additional monthly billings to CITY to reimburse the CITY for the processing of the application mentioned above, including post approval review. Such periodic payments shall be made within 30 days of the billing date. APPLICANT further agrees that failure to pay such accrued costs shall be grounds for suspension of processing. CITY OF ASPEN APPUCANI 4 /6/ w#Â¢1 â‚¬-A. /cv p. 1 se s By:~~adOA 8614 By.:1*#_P-~ /11 , 1/ Diane Moore Maihng Addrels: 3 / 7 Â»2 k City Planning Director Ad A s r ey\J Date -2 l /91 99 2 Certificate of Title: See Addendum. Legal Description: Lot 2, UTE PARK SUBDIVISION, according to the Plat thereof, filed February 22,1993, in Plat Book 30 at Page 86. Vicinity Map: 11 - =71Â«2-11. .... ..... . 1 . -=â€žL/: 1 0 0 f. 1 0 .>...0.3 9 .. ,1 . 00 0 .\4 4 .... . .. . ... 12*41 . .0 '7\ . *Â·r . 11 ...1.:..... 4.,31 2 ... .. 74 1 ' .. L I.. \.. 5 7 " re .4 . \3. 1'.4 . 7 ... 0/ .4- . . '..1 . 0 \f .7. i \ .3 3 4 . -2-2.. \ F 7--,t I \1 ... / . 0 - v: Â·::1..: 'Â· . 2/tki i/ / ? ., 99-a-:4 4. .. 10 9 'n , % .. .Â© - c 'J . a -- /F--=.3.*,1(2 ..1- '4 i ' Â»* -~ ic jÂ·t: ) i...7 - ~ 22,1 'Jul ,/ 0, 1 \4\:f, \' ./CIri . 4 =. u. .. T n ' u 1~% %~9) vel Â· / / K .... ~v pit,# Â· . -1 1 . /' U t ic j ' 1 ~1 i9214 \.-1 4 \ . U c -463L Â· 4-4 - ....... f /2 - I .. . .:..>4:re.i::: :284.4 . ...- ..-=... :.:./.1.......:.:.>:.4 .-'- '40<~1 -- Â· 1. 1...\- \R ..rk:7%: *: ..3-:+tÂ·.-22 LCO:nOU - -----/ IR Â· Â·1 >21 *EkkL-*'- --\2* of FY#71611- 4 4~ Â·Er : Â·': Mut--:-7, '4?[52* .. ..Â·~eent~. 1:'74:;<j~ ~~ 0; -i:5~ tt:. < --1.. &5//t -/9~*-WI,17~0 -. :/-*f--3.-/41~:.wiÂ·- .(...<.i 1 J< 7 3.. \Flf : - Â·12:.1:6,f~uk;f25--.Â·-.2. ;*3;/f-*521: 4. I. 1 .. .. 1 . .' 1 - /4 - r I. . 8040 Greenline Application Site Plan: See Sheet Al. Proposed Elevations: See Sheets A2, A3. Proposed Sections: See Sheet A4. Description of Bull dina Techniques The new single-family residence will be constructed in the building envelope, part of which has been identified as being of moderate avalanche hazard. Structural recommendations by the avalanche engineer, Arthur Mears will be adopted into the design of the residence and the landscaping. Other than the concrete foundation and walls, the remainder of the home will be of approved wood- frame construction. During construction, measures will be taken to protect the site from damage due to erosion. ORDINANCE N0.18 (SERIES OF 1992) AN ORDINANCE OF THE ASPEN CITY COUNCIL GRANTING REZONING FROM (RR) RURAL RESIDENTIAL TO (AH) AFFORDABLE HOUSING, SUBDIVISION, FINAL PUD, GROWTH MANAGEMENT EXEMPTION FOR FREE MARKET HOUSING IN AN (AH) AFFORDABLE HOUSING ZONE DISTRICT AND FOR DEED RESTRICTED HOUSING,CONDOMINIUMIZATION, VESTED RIGHTS, AND WAIVER OF THE WATERMAIN EXTENSION MORATORIUM FOR THE UTE PARK SUBDIVISION, A FOUR LOT SUBDIVISION ON A 3.8 ACRE METES AND BOUNDS PARCEL SITUATED IN THE NW 1/4 SE 1/4 OF SECTION 18, TOWNSHIP 10 SOUTH, RANGE 84 WEST OF THE SIXTH PRINCIPAL MERIDIAN, PITKIN COUNTY, COLORADO. WHEREAS, in September 1989, the (AH) Affordable Housing zone district was created to promote private sector development of deed ---restricted affordable housing by allowing limited free market residential development within a project; and WHEREAS, in April 1990 the Ute Park Partnership (Applicant) submitted an application for rezoning of a 3.8 acre parcel on the east end of Ute Avenue from (RR) Rural Residential to (AH) Affordable Housing in conjunction with an application for Conceptual PUD review; and WHEREAS, the Planning and . Zoning Commission recommended approval of a Conceptual PUD Plan with conditions on July 3, 1990; and WHEREAS, the City Council reviewed the Conceptual PUD Plan and the Planning and Zoning commission's recommendations, discussed rezoning of the parcel to (AH) Affordable Housing as a threshold issue, and approved the Conceptual Plan with conditions on August 13, 1990; and WHEREAS, in December 1991, the Applicant submitted an application for Rezoning, Subdivision, Final PUD Plan, Growth 1 Management Exemption for free market development in an AH zone and 1 for affordable housing, Condominiumization, Vested Rights, Special , Reviews for Open Space and Parking in an AH zone, 8040 Greenline Review, waiver of Park Development Impact Fees, and Waiver of the Waterline Extension Moratorium for the development of seven deed restricted affordable townhome units and three free market lots for single family residences; and WHEREAS, the applicant also requested an extension to the one- year filing deadline for submission of a Final PUD Plan; and WHEREAS, on January 13, 1992, upon staff' s recommendation , the City Council granted a 160 day filing extension effective retroactively from August 1991; and WHEREAS, the Aspen City Council having reviewed the development proposal for the Ute Park Subdivision and the 1 recommendations from the planning and Zoning Commission and i Planning staff, approved Rezoning from (RR) Rural Residential to (AH) Affordable Housing, Subdivision, Final PUD Plan, Growth Management Exemption for free market residential development and affordable housing, Condominiumization, Vested rights, and waiver of the waterline extension moratorium. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ASPEN, COLORADO: Section 1: That it hereby grants the following approvals for the Ute Park Subdivision pursuant to the applicable sections in the Aspen i Municipal Code: Rezoning from RR (Rural Residential) to AH (Affordable Housing) (Chapter 24, Section 7, Division 11) ; : . / 1 2 Subdivision (Chapter 24, Section 7-1004); Final PUD Plan (Chapter 24, Section 7, Division 903); Growth Management Exemption for Free Market Development in an AH Zone District, and Affordable Housing (Chapter 24, Section 8-104.C.); and Subdivision Exemption for Condominiumization (Chapter 24, Section 7-1007). Section 2: The following conditions shall apply to the approvals: 1. The Applicant shall include within the Subdivision Agreement financial assurances for the construction of the affordable housing component of the project. This shall consist of placement of First Deeds. of Trust of $10. 00 value on Lots 1,2 and 3 in the name of the City of Aspen. Upon the sale of the first free market lot, the deed to Lot 4 will be placed in escrow for the City of Aspen. In addition, a letter of credit i payable to the City of Aspen shall be provided by the Applicant which covers the construction costs Of the townhomes. Upon delivery of the letter of credit and placement of the Lot 4 deed in escrow, the City shall release the remaining First Deeds of Trust. If construction of the townhomes by the Applicant has not begun within two years of recordation of the Final Plat, the City shall take possession of Lot 4, the architectural plans ot the townhomes shall be turned over to the City, and the City shall redeem the letter of credit in order to construct the townhomes within one year. 2. The applicant shall include within the Subdivision Agreement specific provisions for the mitigation of avalanche dangers 3 for the seven deed restricted townhome units. Protection of the townhouses (by retaining wall or residential structure) must extend the entire length of the "conditional zone" on Lot 1 unless the unprotected townhouses are designed to standards established by Art Mears or similar avalanche expert. Avalanches shall not be deflected onto neighboring properties. 3. The home on Lot 1 shall be constructed prior to or simultaneously with construction of the seven townhouses. If built simultan-eously, the structural framing of the Lot 1 house and any necessary retain-ing walls must be complete and approved by the Building Department prior to issuance of Certificates of Occupancy for the townhouses. 4. In the event that the Final Plat and Subdivision agreement have not been filed prior to issuance of any Building Permits f for the Ute Park lots, the financial assurance and avalanche protection documents must be approved by the City Attorney and recorded with the Pitkin County Clerk and Recorder prior to issuance of any building permits on Ute Park parcels. 5. The applicant will continue to coordinate roadway design, drainage, snow storage, etc. with City staff. Any improvement work must be done in accordance with City specifications. Alternative on-site parking locations for the townhomes shall be noted on the PUD Plan and Final Plat. 6. Prior to the issuance of any building permits for the townhomes, the applicant shall satisfy the City Engineer regarding storm drainage calculations. Storm drainage . 4 calculations must be provided for the free market homes at the time of individual building permit application. 7. The applicant shall indicate the entire avalanche zones on the Final PUD Plan. 8. Avalanche warning signs shall be indicated on the plat along the property boundaries along Ute Ave. and along the nordic trail. 9. Any hazardous or toxic soils must be stabilized and revegetated or removed to a site acceptable to the City. 10. Prior to constructions, a fugitive dust control plan must be obtained from the Colorado Pollution Control Division and this office. 11. If the water line in the proposed utility corridor is dedicated to the City of Aspen a water main easement must be executed between the Applicant and the City prior to issuance of any excavation or building permits. 12. The Final Plat and PUD Plan shall indicate that the homes on Lots 1 and 2 must be sprinklered for fire protection. The Applicant shall satisfy the Fire Marshal regarding emergency access prior to filing the Final Plat. 13. The subdivision Final Flat shall indicat-e the conceptual trail alignment. The County Open Space and Trails Program (COSTP) may act as assignee of the City of Aspen for the construction and maintenance of the trail. Upon completion of this trail, the COSTP will be responsible for surveying and filing the as- built trail easement. Plat note #7 shall be amended to: 5 remove the one year deadline for trail construction; state ,--21 that conceptual trail alignment and subsequent trail easement will run with the land and bind future heirs and assigns of the developer; the trail alignment may be amended by mutual consent of both parties (lot owners and City/COSTP). The year-round trail easement shall be 15' wide with side slopes not to exceed 6%. The Nordic Council and the applicant shall work together and verify the trail alignment as shown on the Plat and PUD Plan complies with the most workable alignment for skiing and trail connections. Signage shall indicate avalanche and rockfall hazards to trail users. These signs shall be installed prior to commencement of any site work. 14. The seven townhomes shall be deed restricted as four Category 4 units and three Category 3 units in accordance with Housing , Authority Guidelines. The restrictions shall be approved by the Housing Authority and filed with the Pitkin County Clerk and Recorder prior to issuance of City approval of the Final Plat. 15. All material representations made by the applicant in the application and during public meetings with the Planning and Zoning Commission and City Council shall be adhered to and considered conditions of approval, unless otherwise amended by other conditions. 16. The Subdivision Plat and Subdivision / PUD Agreement shall be recorded in the office of the Pitkin County Clerk and Recorder. Failure on the part of the applicant to record the 6 Plat and Agreement within a period of one hundred and eighty (180) days following approval by the City Council shall render the Plat and PUD Plan approval invalid and reconsideration and approval of both by the Commission and City Council will be required before their acceptance and recording, unless an extension or waiver is granted by City Council for a showing of good cause. Section 3: An exemption from the moratorium on expansions to the City's municipal water system as imposed by Resolutions 12 and 45 (Series 1991) be and is hereby granted so as to allow the extension of the municipal water delivery system for three single family residences in the Ute Park Subdivision. Section 4: Pursuant to Section 24-6-207 of the Municipal Code, the i City Council does hereby grant the applicant vested rights for the Ute Park Subdivision and Final PUD Plan as follows: 1. The rights granted by the site specific development plan approved by this Ordinance shall remain vested for three (3) years from the date of final adoption specified below. However, any failure to abide by the terms and conditions attendant to this approval shall result in forfeiture of said --- --vastai-pr-cip erty--rig-NÂ·55-7--Fai-Iurâ‚¬-ta-tfizmicy--afia-*ir-oper Iy---F-2-or all plats and agreements as specified herein and or in the Municipal Code shall also result in the forfeiture of said vested rights. 2. The approval granted hereby shall be subject to all rights of referendum and judicial review. 7 3. Nothing in the approvals provided in this Ordinance shall exempt the site specific development plan from subsequent reviews and or approvals required by this Ordinance or the general rules, regulations or ordinances or the City provided that such reviews or approvals are not inconsistent with the approvals granted and vested herein. 4. The establishment herein of a vested property right shall not preclude the application of ordinances or regulations which are general in nature and are applicable to all property subject to land use regulation by the City of Aspen including, but not limited to, building, fire, plumbing, electrical and mechanical codes. In this regard, as a condition of this site development approval, the developer shall abide by any and ) all such building, fire, plumbing, electrical and mechanical codes, unless an exemption therefrom is granted in writing. Section 5: The Official Zone District Map for.the City of Aspen shall be and is hereby amended to reflect that rezoning as set forth in Section 1 above and such amendment shall be promptly entered on the Official Map in accordance with Section 24-5-103 B. of the Municipal Code. Section 6: This Ordinance shall not effect any existing litigation and shall not operate as an abatement of any action or proceeding now pending under or by virtue of the ordinances repealed or amended as herein provided, and the same shall be conducted and concluded ~ l 8 i . under such prior ordinances. Section 7: If any section, subsection, sentence, clause, phrase, or portion of this Ordinance is for any reason held invalid or unconstitutional in a court of competent jurisdiction, such portion shall be deemed a separate, distinct and independent provision and shall not affect the validity of the remaining portions thereof. Section 8: The City Clerk shall cause notice of this Ordinance to be published in a newspaper of general circulations within the City of Aspen no later than fourteen (14) days following final adoption hereof. Such notice shall be given in the following form: Notice is hereby given to the general public of the approval of a site specific development plan, and the creation of a j vested property right pursuant to Title 24, Article 68, Colorado Revised Statutes, pertaining to the following- described property: The property shall be described in the notice and appended to said notice shall be the ordinance granting such approval. Section 9: That the City Clerk is directed, upon the adoption of this --9-r-dinance, 1-n rprnrd a copy of_khis ordinance in the office of the Pitkin County Clerk and Recorder. Section 10: A public hearing on the Ordinance shall be held on the /3 day of ~~*AÂ·t~~, 1992 at 5:00 in the City Council Chambers, Aspen City Hall, Aspen Colorado, fifteen (15) days prior to which hearing a ! 9 public notice of the same shall be published in a newspaper of , /n general circulation within the City of Aspen. INTRODUCED, READ AND ORDERED PUBLISHED as provided by law, by the City Council of the City of Aspen on the 43 day of Â· 1992. 0 (5Â»09 - John Bennett, Mayor Attest: 1Â»04- dit Kathryn <. Koch, City Clerk FINALLY, adopted, passed and approved this =2(0 day of , 1992. 0 (3- John dennett, Mayor Alry 4/44 Kathryn 9. Koch, City Clerk 10 - I '91 i r -. A. 4 eUY 9- PC ERS .#\ i I 2 LoT 1 Suati IT --- ---- 1% 1 fpELIMINARY SITE/4#RADI Nef B#N - Leerehic _ * ~Â»20[ TFEP -Dee FAErbveR' 11â‚¬2865 6"+ tle C)#46812 40.1.1. BE 12.ElÂ«~r ap. 2 J 0 9KET, 1128% -2, FEMAN. - - - E:,<liT. a,NTBUR 1 COPYRIGHT 4 Â· Ne# CoN-re:U le :.1 1 1 THEODOME K 6UY MDSOaATES PC> ./ 4 -.SM .. . . 7 - - 21 - . t. - . ... - 0 - . .. ...4 . & 1. . . 6 -4----~~.-1- .. . I 4 , . . 0 /4. e 00 - . . 1 . 6. -- .. 0 . . 1 .- . ..... D -- 5, "=T:FEezo~-4.~"/ . .. , . =.. . ' . ' 0 =. - 00 .. -1 . .. ... . i 4 0. \ oes-T - . A U THEODORE K GUN' 0 ASSOCIATES PO '42 \ H U Ne>N Â· 1 '%*ap4 WA... i MRCM\TBOTS AND Pr-- -4- STRUGWRAL ENGINEERS \X rzj63*22 - -1-77 P.O. BOX 1640 ir==rm== 23280 HFYÂ¥. 82 i ~ i BAULT, cal.CAUDO 81621 5 05) gz-1-5161 6060.6 FAX (309) q2-1-46'5 1 M t-mlkly 21 1 3 4 1 - 4 Â» ~1 ZL___ ~ 03 f %441* 2- 7Â£Â·- 1/ 1 1 l' , 3060.0 1 - -9 -J#te* - Aill. , 111/15*1- 1 7 j i r-*--'* +8 it. 9, h -. Lible of E><iÂ©T A 111. . 92044 .O 1 - a -kÂ·--- 1 HAT. CIRAOE, TYF. 5,+4*<42.- 1-1 -6. 4 -' --'.-- .--4 . 171 --EDÂ¥ - 2034.6 fuâ€¢Â¥- t19* i * 13-21Euti"[-11 MATE Bel,ARK, '&9334 4â‚¬0@Nkl.Ng.-164-sueflir ------------- ------------- -1. ?..91 -Ig - -- --- - --- -- IFDW-Yaâ€¢Â·------ f*X .t . MINNERMAN V RESIDENCE 1- -N~2- -ilik2 .gl. I .. #det - Â·t '~: 1. 1 *4 -4.l k LOT 2 ~ ~ UTE P,â€¢RK SUBDMS\ON . ' .t 3 :i,T.-r-z--1 #li Â». \ I k - --LL- 'f.Â»Nr ASPEN, CO . I - 27-,77- _ ... -:...... ..= 4-/ --Emr--0.16.--22_ -- '- .==Â·-'r-- 96...Â·.7, Â·- Â·.Â·. 4.. . f Â· - 970(00.S . 0 % A Â« . 1-Â·AC ./ .: ...Â·-.' ..'- -"Dr:Â©*....*'.I-.Â·- - . .1 .i<# v - Â·'Â£14 _,c,if2 k -*,1 r, 1- ~~ A f i-4 +anÂ·Â· i . . 'k ~ - Â· - 62,1 . -7~ JOE; *: â‚¬112 1Â· - 4Â·Â·He A- 1 . 006*. 6 R r . - , . : i. 1441*.01 :4,-y /4 DRAF+1: CAAI '<Â· . i -: 181 .ty *U 1 -t 1 -===Atu?.*3- 7, 12 6260 ' ; , 5 4-T .t 2,1 r ir.2 CHECI<EC>. +4441*-2. ..'q,Â»')4- . , W ----Â¥ ~.4 4 1.~r. I I '1 - ..4.. 2Ek*'5>' , , .~ T .r,r ' i - ' FRNTED: 6/27/94 Â· . I ../ Â»0Â»~721-4.=60Â·1~4Â·40- rÂ·-9- 1. ,Â» -, 4 . -44.....+ â€¢A ./.'- . 1-9 + 0)0â‚¬>04 0 4-6 1-k :f 1 6 -1, L 1-8/11.jor +4- CHEEI_IMLE; i. r. -2. -:t - 4-3. 4.4 - - ' ' I./- 4 A ../ * 1 1., :. d..,t' 4. . J 4.- ./ ELEVATION Â· 'r_ + Â· a. . t -9 + t. 006*.0 - %- L . / '12 4, 3 11 "4.. :'-7-:' ' ... 411, t 1- . 0#04% -.4 t:*101*Ze, --~-1-,4~ 9'~- 39-11 4(Lt,-6- ~441\2 '4 1147-~-- 17~(2 . ~.~~ti: 201 ~74: REI*:f â‚¬- I.JF. ,- - -*-c- - 9- 4 00:31.le A2 '1Â·. -- 1 1.,7-<M-1 Â·1â€ž- 4,&+-Vt' 1 1 Lly - Vt" 1, Il i 2 0 Â¥ COPYRICDHT THEODORE K eVY *5016â€¢Tee po 4 90 1 , lE U THEODORE K GUY ASSOCIATES PC E MeAA\TECTS AND STRUCTURAL ENGINEERS P.O. BOX 1640 I- % 23280 Hy#. 82 4-,---te BPâ‚¬A-T, COLORADO 81621 1 1 \ (905) el-8167 , FAX (309) el-46'S ---*-I - 60(00 Sb ; 4' r it ; . .---~t 21- 7- LINE OF:- Ewl ST. ~TÂ»,27;736.-9 4 Â· .1 -P ~ MAT . 0,@AD E, 1 f P. 1 - M NELE,1 ~,.Â·11 Â· - 1 1 , --- - 74 6204.6 i ! 1 hÂ»*1 * 2. r 4 1 0 . 0040,0 U/14.1--- 2044,0 Â·Â·1 4-- - - - - --0/1.*/L. _-4.-,--uju.-t,-1-krd.- ag"F'.. 4:5-. *91,6 E__CliTTIN 21_f :V-7 1. f 1 , 1261! EMASE. 9%*EME 4121#.84.1'ii B~*M-'I ------------- ------------- AL-1 e ----- ------------- /4 2 MNNERMAN _ 1 -Nx , RESIDENCE rk \71- , ,. - - LOT 2 -... / UTE PARK SUBDIVISION / ASPEN, CO '~- /F - -~ r--7#1- ' - ni I 1 b M 1, 8000.6 t. 1 1 1 9 \ 1 - M, Er-1 4 //fl ~ n . 2 ... 51 - 4 6 ----1 - .. 6<3 fl I. t-- - r --- -- --Â·---+ -4)1 -- 4 2. I U. . 1 6 i 2)064.Â¢6 Joe It â‚¬172 DRAI*1: CF*41 ---- fluEÂ·*14 1 CHECKEC>: / 5 J FRNTED: 6/17/94 8060.0 , 11444-* SHEET TITLE: ELEVATION 2)066.0 -- .Ap -- k.4- 808'Le fla, INIZE-- ri Â«i U. Fe = 11 -0 1/ . . COPYWT na,DORE K GUY *SOCAAMB PO â‚¬ ' fl}te -: 44 . NEO / A ,- - -3070 \A-ly .-- - .h THEODORE K GUY - 1, - ~ / ) 0-ty~/1 --/ A x ASSOCIATES PC ...111. --. - -~ ~~-~~ '~ ~~ ~ ~,f~~~77374>k:ic - h ARCHITECTS ANC> I l i \4i / - STRUCTURAL ENGINEERS \ \ 806.0 &:>bo 2--- /~- 1 P.O. BOX 1640 , 2280 HFNY'. 82 1 1 >e 7, BABALT, COLORADO Ij j 1 1 / t 81621 , / i/ Url E oP FAX (305) 921-468 , 803) Glyl-316-1 -1 80160 .& .' 1 / 'et! 11. P IN 01 L*... '. -- ATI o A , ,Â©NVELOFE I ir\/C tb' t*:265773,â„¢rt /_ i Ve.\ 1/ & 70 2 .\FP'.Le*,eap. / /, '/, 12. 6091.0 '54\ M FE, 12.. 80 E 0 -- 2:- ~-~ ~T ~ /'-- ~. < r 1 .944.7.6 - pA-170 //' ->U / 1 1 4 Al).0 \ - / 443., , // LOT 2 7 -) 8045, 6 * + -- - ..h j } 61 v f N Â¢1 . 3039 0 1 / ... CD \- /1 / 805 1,45 ' j 13:9 / , 0 E.ASENCMT | -- - - - whgo j . --- , 0 . fbEOR/)19 , j , 1 1 . f*My , &0 - - -0 - X 7 *041.5 -1<2 - Re up -- \9 N' 171 , r- Boot- Rerm, LLIMiT o P , . F , *'WN,4.,4 -/ .i 227 41 26 // INA'+ 414*12trtei r wl' ArCh, ' ~5 9 ../ - 3 61-oFE - '-1 i::p*y---* 1, 1â‚¬V-Phi@x,t.4 r ry. wyÂ·-*a-x.,3'tf T-" r / 9 ,-0 id l k 94 / 4,1 /1 r o r/ ; ~ *111 4-* . , _-~>Dfl.-)1=4941-904Â©Â©9 4-+/2 A LA- pAINAR * F *#-7--*-2---4.- ) PrTCH - 17 t-*_-z-~KT- -1- -4.-10/1 1 --Â·49" 1- -- 12AIE EEM,Â§8&1 ---I...P 4 1 -. 1 . '20 No q0x' 4 8 4/ 0/ --___ --_-_-_-----_ /r 1 4/ O . Â©Cl 4 _ 04- -1-7-, 4/ ./ V EPGE)41 E +4" (049+ ---~ 1 . 1 // FARKGI, --1 ./.*r..r-_33 -1 ----â„¢ - / - 203 So -1.FL# ' A.:,/ 1 7 1/ / 1 / , --- 1 1 \\ 00 01*.- Me*2 - no ------------------ U wr-11/ / ' 1// 1 - %05,/ 7~.7-9., } i f61â‚¬ CH --- -/ *' j- 4 Â¢03-7. A - RESIDENCE U j - \ // MINNERMAN I /2 6031, G r / 4, / / ./ 1 . i - CAARMEl 1 / // / 1 t 60 36 0 /0 .* *-*. I../ ,/ / LOT 2 6030 ---- 1,1 V1 461 --- 0-LA e 1 -* -0 *- /- ASPEN, 00 UTE PARK SUBDIVISION / 0 8,1 11-0114â‚¬3r . 8020,0 al- SAIVEL.oPE EAGEMENT ./. ./I. / 00--~ '2 -- -- \ / -... / 1 JOB *: â‚¬172 - -19=4nS 1 2-_2* / t 1&99%2 7--7 / ....I--- -0.-il- ORAF.4. 14 . I ---- ,/ / t/ C.HECKED: , - â€¢ ~ PRHTED 6 -1- 44Â· / 5HZZLIIILL: I *-* / --I .- 1 #- ~4 ----. -I-- ./- - PRELIMINARY - 1. - 1 @917- /-1 00 f GRADNe PLAN -\ - El / - 1 - - - I./. 1 - / -- I .... . , L / / ---- X t Â· A.-- .â€¢-r 20, / 1 1 C k \ rzA Ult ME i / feveST+DAN (h> / 7 1 BONS-ENT \â‚¬29 ,7 , f \ 4 17 j Al.A f. 1.1 #hjiÂ»fl ---- --0- . COPYWI6HT '' 7242 21 M 14\ 1:2 Â¥ c if GA E>; 1 AJ eN e l . A r,4 I Al N pirk r:Al /41 nIEOPORE K Â®UY AesocaTES PO 1 4. 1 4 21=201.Oil Â¢ 9 - 1-- 1. -.. SUY pc is --- -- -- --- -- -- ---- 3 a . I .6 I ... . 4 0. . 0 . 4 ... .. - 2 - =A .. . I . ... ' . t. . / . - I -- .... I. 0 - .. ... i ... I -0- .0 %; 4 . ... -0 4 . 0 % . . - .. . 1 , -- . .. D .. - . a .. , .... ... .. -- - , ..... 0 . .. a. 1 . . .. 4 41 -- n ... THEODORE K GUY ASSOCIATES PC ARCHITECTS *D .. STRUCTURAL ENGINEERS P.O. BOX 1640 23280 HAY. 82 B,beALT, C.OLORADO 81621 803) el-3461 FAX (309) 42-1-46â‚¬ cp > , LOT 2 LoT 3 t -TRA' 6 â€¢ EASE#/1 eNT 41 cfego .. % -k 70 - - 92 1 VA-Te il--9- -yl- <P,2.14,0 > 60 = 6 6 9,0 _Â» Â»* .h U f,F,EFT 1- B\/91, - v'- -- LE -0 hk -. 570 = 604%,9 , 1 I - I HAIR 1,8491- 20 38.0 t==1 LAâ€¢le,2 lIE=ve 1- 1 6.--21-4 .2.J e Mel'K Â· 1 UTE,AME. go - r PAm 22!Eltilazi - 4 â‚¬ LIble oF , 20 - - ' 48 ----- ---- - - flÂ«'Foâ‚¬,ERES' C=! 1 -F - 1 CABAPE 1 - LIN~ ofi-2 -7- ----- 10 - Ea><isT. ARAC:'B ----- -I----------- %040 - detacT ION ------------- 111 cs <201 - oIl ININNERMAN , RESIDENCE LOT 2 UTE PARK SUBDIVISION ASPEN, CO JOE; N. â‚¬112 - DRAVW: 39 C.HECKE>: PRNTED: 3-9-9+ SHEET TITLE: .. GRADING SECTIONS CÂ£)1'YNT THEODORE K Buy ~SSOCIATES PC \- B.L.M. BRASS CAP, CORNER NO. 9 OF TRACT 41 . 0 \;EAST ASPEN TOWNSITE AND CORNER OF LOT 13 AND LEGEND N LOT 18, SECTION 18, T.10 S., R.84 W., 6TH P.M. N 01Â° 05' 16" E PLANNING DIRECTOR APPROVAL e ... 67.21' \ * UTE CHILDRENS PARK MONUMENT, FOUNDIN PLACE O AS DESCRIBED This Plat of UTE PARK SUBDIVISION was approved by the City of Aspan Planning CLERK AND RECORDER'S ACCEPTANCE CERTIFICATE OF OWNERSHIP AND DEDICATION f. 1 V, Director this ;0~ day Of F,.6 , 1993. REBAR AND CAP POINDQF BEGINNING This Plot of UTE PARK SUBDIVISION was accepted fJ; filing in the office of the KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS that Ute Pork General Partnership, a Colorado r -5 - 1-3-4, 20151 ~ / FOUND, BUREAU OF LAND Clerk and Recorder of Pitkin County, Colorado, at o'clock - M., General Partnership being the sole owner of the UTE PARK SUBDIVISION does \ ~ / -~- MANAGEMENT BRASS CAP, A.. - this day of , 1993, in Plar Book hereby Plat sald real Dropertv in accordance with th, .Int .hawn hor.... < 7-60.- -G- h. - IS I Id ,f y ARK W.- 6.-V, ./ , , "* ,,./ 6-6- - EL' ./.' .40/ Wallace E. Beedle ~ < 2007 j , FIRST DISCOVER SUCH DEFECT. IN NO EVENT MAY ANY ACTION BASED UPON A _ v P.E., P.L,S., 20632 Wpl, DEFECT IN THISSURVEY BE COMMENCED MORE THAN TEN YEARS FROM THE DATE re\ /, OF CERTIFICATION SHOWN HEREON. \ BANNER SCALE: JOB NO: DATE: PLAT OF UTE PARK SUBDIVISION 1" = 30' 8203-03 1-26-93 BANNER ASSOCIATES. Â»IC. I CONSULTING ENGIEERS 8 ARCHTECTS 2777 CROSSROADS BOULEVARD 0 GRAIO JUNCTION, CO 8006 0 13031 243-2242 1 SHEET NO: ASPEN, PITKIN COUNTY, COLORADO 1 of 1 , 606 E. MAId 0 SUITE 6 0 ASPEN, CO 0161 0 13031 926-8857 l , oÂ¥ 2 828-379 - .. ..... . 0. 0 0 . A.. ... .0 1\ L .~ I A. .2 1 A. I ' -I.u'll............9.3.19""95. , :. I .. ~....... - 1, .. .. :.. - 1 : . . .... . . .. 0 0 0 0 . .. . 0 ... A .: 0 .. I. .0 ... , .0 & 0 : 1 : D .. . .0 .0 .. ... 49 I , 00 0, - 0- A 0 9 I . a , .. .. I .2 . I . I . .. 1. .. 0.0 . .. . I :Al. 1 A. .A . - 0 00 0. . I. . ........ .... 0 0 0 eGA . .1 0, - . .0 .. ..... ... GAÂ· - â€¢â€¢â€¢ ... ADA . I e A . .0 , D. I .. ... . .... I ./ 4 F . I ... . ...... . . ... 9: I J~N . . e . . .. .2 . . I. r I . -A ... 0 0 I - I e . e. ./ 0 .... I . ... 1 2 *0 . . D. . 1 1 . 1 . . . . 1 . I . .. . A.A . A . I .. . ..... ../ . A :.0 .A .. , 0 . .1 .A ....: .. .4 , 0 . . . . . . 00 . I. 0 0 . 0 - . ...... .1 . . . ... . 4 J . 1. 1 .... . -4- :' 0 00 ... .... . 4 - .... ' I . 4 ... 1 . 4. . . . . h .. 1 I V.U.~1./.0 0 1 1. 1 ... ., . 1 ... ..... 0 0 ....1 0 .. .... - , . 1 0 - , 921 . . .. 1.1 . .. 0 0. 0 . A 0. 1. 1 1 0 fil . A ... , Al . .:.0 ./ 0. jr . . : 0. 0 ..4 .... 0 A . 1 Â¥ I ... A. 4 .: 0 . .. . Â¥ 41 --'"/I~ 9 , 0 0 ~~* {I .. 0 "''I . 0 0 . 0 . .... Z. 0 ... A I . I . ... A - . -. .."8.9................A .. i. 4 % 6 I. A I. : 1 -:A. A. A- 1 0. .-. %1 0 I. . 0 4 kil/bl- Aly , '00 0 . 0 l .0 0. .... fil bki A . 0-,/IN-. Ir- '1 4 , , â€¢ 9 . 1 I .. . '4 4, 5-.-4-- O '-r ..4+141" - E ..; 45 . .-I.. â€ž~I ... . 1 A -0 4 4 11/91'll'll'll'll'll'll'll./.- ....... A- 'It : /0-- -1-2- 1 u ... . . A 0 4 ....Fl --..~ 4 .. I .0 . 4, I ..: 0 . A. 4. I ..8. . I 4/ Â¢2 :IC . . 0 4 4 -1 0. X e . I ... 4 . .. I 0 0. 2, 4 0 - ... . 0 . . 0. .. . ' 4 i: 00 0 4 ..... I ..0 0 0 . A.. ... , 2 .. 9 a . . 4 . e . 0 .Ii . 1 1,1, . . : e . 5 0 : .. 0 I. k : .- / .O~IA .. A .... . 194f 4 0 0 0 Â¥L b â€¢â€¢â€¢ I . - I 4 - . 2- . Ak , 1 .. 0 I 0 . . . . . 1 4 . - 0. - - Il.. -Il .A /. 1 : I. 4 0 1 . -4 0 0 -I I -- . 0 ..0 0 . 1 - 0 0 . . 0 m.' : I Â· â€¢â€¢ - â€¢â€¢â€¢ Â· â€¢ Â· I I. D 0. : :. ... 4, ~/~ev::~41 0 . I . . I . A . . . â€¢ -â€¢- Ili//Aa/*P..Ell// 0 0 . / % Y -- -I.---i.-*I- ---I--1-i-- ~------ -- ~ =--9 %).--M k-M- 5%-- i ---- ----- <.0---I.$-I --i-.-i -- , / 7- .-I- / // 1 /// / . - / M.- ' - %30- % 1-1-~ flifixictiir - .- 3/'- -- / ---* 4----1-- -I--- _ - --- --- / i / -/- '100 - ----- -- - , - - 0 , / // I , , -- ---- N - --1 1/ + - ---- - . 1 -- - 11 '. N -1-- M.; / - -\ -- - - . - - .- / ~ 3 ---- -MI.//. - M / , /i / , / \ 1 - 1 \ - ,/ 1 ... - -/ k // / / *- ' /04 . ..' - -- lr- -Bep-70 460434/ J . / / ---- 7 1 0 0 -, K - . ~ ~ ~.. - CONCEPTUAL CENTERLINE 0(2*31(/PEDESTRIAN T~All EASEMENT . 4,4, .- - , -- 44--- --- / / // -- - ~ --/ -- *--4 4-/1 < I / - --- - / -2-1 -- . - -_ -- i * - - Notes: f. - ,- 4 - , 1 \ , F / -- ~ ~- Â·~ ' 1. See Final Plat for detail of all easements, rights of way and reservations. /- - g . . 1. H. ~ *DID - - --- -- -- I / C - 1-*-*---1-* P---*.- --. -1-- - . /-- ---- - -*K + -1 2. All improvements within the Ute Avenue 50' Right of Way shall be the responsibility of the Ute Avenue Improvements District- 21_1>Â» r - 022,/1 - --- -----Ii-4 '-Il-*--- - 4- --- -- --I- / , / < UNCONDITIONAL ZONE CONDITIONXC i ------ --- e~50 3. Building location and design on Lot 4 are representative only Final plan and location shall be on record at the Building Department prior to construction. 1 4. Parking for Units 1,3, and 5 are within the City of Aspen 10' parking reservation BLDG. ENVELOPE ]~' ~ < / 0 . Â· ~eNE / I - %-1 4 . - -.. -- - x \1 /-- 0040 I - - % I ,/ - - ~~~ ~ LOT 1 /LOT 2 --. --*.- -'------ i ------ -1----- 4-- - , 0 / ---* --I -- - f \\./ - 3<\ 1 -/ 1, 1 - - CONDITIONAL ZONE - Â·- ------Â·- -- , L.-- - UNCONDITIONAL ZONE -- -- - - ---- ~ - - /~ ~ ~aAOISSEaMENT ~ ' _ _ ' T . . - - . XM. TL-J-r '_ -'0 Â«cE=tz=--- 2*ja 6. EAVELOPE~ -- --- \ 143% / - + T *t # 4 N <b , \ .\\ \ . 1. f r , / .Witvo tEss>-- - -- \2:b, 40.- N --- .-I ----1/ , t / 2 -~ / 0 ---, . - 0 \>t 4 Ct.89. a 14 - - _ . - --- --- -BLDG ENVELOPE - - 3- :. - DE,VEÂ·WAY -' < ' .-. - 3- \\ - - 1 t // --##---*---I--*). '<42=- - 454*.a .22 --- -. - X -><Za-- 12- --- *3.----6020 1. J ~--- -- -- ~ -- FIRE ACCESS EASEMENI \ < , -- - . 36 8?/LÂ¢%11 . / . 0/#4- - - , - .-- Â»R/1, 1 \ 1 - 1 ---77 4/ 7-h - 0 . / 1 - M /< -- * *kiri--r / 0 0 =....2 -----BLOG. ENVELOPt , - L \ r - 1 / . .\ - /' \ 1 \ ,- 1 /\0 - 74-30 - / // 217 - ~ - 1 / 06,10 *- f / / M. . +13 - / , N / I. *-- 1 444Â»\ UTE PARK SUBDIVISION / 1(' BLDG SETS<K - x-Â· ._._.Â·' -- ' /'-- k-.. Â«40141 - 4 - ~* -u-f/AfTYÂ£*p -- 4 j r . I \\ / -. .- k. I 1 . 1 . 1- r- 1/ 1 -1 / N - , -- / OWNER. / 1-1 .--1 -- - ~ - - --- LOT 3 . = - -> ~ - 1- .-0 --<--I--- -.212\1 , , l , \914 - 96 , tx -- - - il . -*--- 215 South Monarch - // 1 6 1 2 . Ute Park Partnership , / / / 1 \ 1 LOT 4 e/~0-~ - \ \7 --*- --- 0. Â»41Â« / - / Aspen. CO. 81611 0-0--i-~ I -- - 81 - - -- -- - -- hÂ« \ BLDG, 2.-' \1 - ' ' ~ - 1 ./ , .. 1 - - a j (303) 925-8;1{) / i . 51 - -- 1-1 - . / -- ---1 4 ~-- ~ 21 / UNCONDITIONAL ZONE 1 ,<6NDITIONAL - - * C - -12"RV -4 . 1 - PLANNINC/SITE DE VELOPMENT -- The 5tevens Group Inc UNTT - - UNF[ 2 _UNIT 1 UNIT 4 -'Â·1 'L -Ublll-Â»~- UNIT 6 , pt Vt /./////0 -1//- , 65Â» r/- --- .1-- , * -gl-~ I - / / /-----T.- 247~~ 7- i--4 . . - 1-*L / I . \ 1 \\ -- t / Aspen, CO. 81611 / 418 East Cooper Suite 205 I ./ / ,Â£41 - -/ tz>Do--H ZONE - - / - -- '11&4341'12:-It~ Z .... ~ I 2 11'E S YIC*, 5 \,0* 1- (103) 925-6717 %. C 5 LE,>r*& -0 -p -A/All OCK B. 1 16 / CIVIL ENGINEERING: A/ tre\ 69 - ---1 - p BLDG. ENWOPE -- -- - - 797 -rp %- $ g~ ---- /32/// , *Â« // / $-- - , S*--1~-- -~~~ --\ 1 -1 Banner Associates Inc ------ -4.374 , FRASH ENCLOSURE -O .~ , /\,$\ 1 -1 3 L / , 4-4 -t~ 73- / / / NO BLOC SETB ----- k /// Aspen, CIO. 81611 --- --- I 10' RESERVATION \~ ,l . - - ' Â· ' 605 East Main \ 011-1-// -L>-0 /- -m/r-=---//- 1- (303) 925-5857 . , / IX ----- --2-,1 -- % 60000 - - fl P. H, _ - -- 1 6 \1 i ff t - ~9' RIGHT OF WAY < ,Â·. ~ _ - wn--L 1.10 " 4,Â«rf" C 3-=- 7--UN) - -_ __- _ _ . Culbertson Associates Inc. 1 ARCHOECTURE: otccnI - 222 Mlwaukee Street Juite 403 Tv,.~..3 U./.0.0 -- - Denver, CO. 80206 / , / 'p/ --tl. / Ix / f -* .UTE CHILDRENS PARK _ ,-- ( 303) 333-6786 1 1 1 C 1 <- I 7/ / / -- --- --) 1 - . -- .J.3- 1 , 3 'I - -- 2<C N / 11 /(,/ // / 1 / I / - / \\ l / FINAL SUBMISSION/ / 1. - -/ 1 p, el. - i IL/010' i I I CI / 1 f --- â€ž,4,- * ---- 1 FINAL PLAT 11/l - / - -K/ / // I..- 9\% -/- //// / 0-- //0 ,- 3 3 -- Wi I 4 9:'A / , NORTH AJ114 lili --/ Z:L 11.- 27 , ~ 0 10 20 4 (,1. 659 i UTE PARK INCORPORATE D ' DATEÂ· JHEET TITLE: 3* 9*rÂ«~042'-- ISSUED FOR: rINKL- 404, RINAL PUD - 4~-1â€¢ - ASPEN CLUB , SHEET NUMBER: . 2, 11 92, AulÂ»ITTÂ»ti) CALLAHAN SUBDIVISION REVISIONS: 8,4,12- DEVELOPMENT PLAN SUBDIVISION 12' 10 Â·95 Ft)1~ Bâ€¢,2%0 21 828-399 242 l 1 t, ASPEN/PITKIN PLANNING OFF _ .f'~Fil 130 S. Galena Street 1 '1?4.-- .. . .- -, , -- 0.-,--TI 1 tul,rfem'RWE n Aspen, Colorado 81611 'nf (303) 920-5090 ~~ FEB 2 8 1994 ... THEODORE K GUY ASSOCIATES, P February 24, 1994 Rob Okazaki Ted Guy Associates P.O. Box 1640 Basalt, CO 81621 RE: Winnerman 8040 Greenline Review Case #A13-94 Dear Rob, The Planning O ffice has completed its preliminary review of the captioned application. We have determined that this application is incomplete. The application will not be scheduled for review until the following items are submitted: 1. Copy of the Ute Park Subdivision plat. 2. Individually address items 1 - 11 of Section 7-503(c) of the Aspen Land Use Code. 3. To address these criteria, please also include the geologic/avalanche/soils reports from the original subdivision review. 4. Submit a grading plan and cross sections through the building envelope which illustrate the extent of the cut slopes. Please submit four copies of the requested information. I f you have any questions, please call Mary Lackner, the Planner assigned to this case, at 920-5106. Thank you. Sincerely, 544-.f-\-~ Suzanne L. Wolff Administrative Assistant dhenÂ©Northern.Ir SUBSOIL STUDY FOR FOUNDATION DESIGN PROPOSED MULTI-FAMILY HOUSING SOUTH OF UTE AVENUE ACROSS FROM ASPEN CLUB ASPEN, COLORADO Prepared For: - Aspen Properties 4 Attn: Jim Martin -ii P.O. Box 10502 - Aspen CO 81612-7344 5 3.6 lit _ Job No. 4 188 90 January 30, 1990 A i,Â·p,Â·,ixÂ·w ,,I tÂ·Â·,Â·~~~~'~~'~tro.,001 Cnn'..10 Â·Â·Â·. . TABLE OF CONTENTS CONCLUSIONS 1 PURPOSE AND SCOPE OF STUDY 1 PROPOSED CONSTRUCTION 2 SITE CONDITIONS 2 FIELD EXPLORATION 3 SUBSOIL CONDITIONS . 3 FOUNDATION RECOMMENDATIONS 4 FLOOR SLABS 5 UNDERDRAIN SYSTEM 5 SURFACE DRAINAGE 6 LIMITATIONS 7 FIGURE 1 - LOCATION OF EXPLORATORY BORINGS FIGURE 2 - LOGS OF EXPLORATORY BORINGS FIGURE 3 - LEGEND AND NOTES FIGURE 4 - GRADATION TEST RESULTS TABLE I - SUMMARY OF LABORATORY TEST RESULTS 1 1 CONCLUSIONS The proposed multi-family housing should be founded with , spread footings bearing on the natural granular soils and designed for an allowable soil bearing pressure of 3000 psf. Other design and construction criteria relating to geotechnical aspects of the proposed building are presented in the body of the report. PURPOSE AND SCOPE OF STUDY This report presents the results of a subsoil study for the proposed multi-family housing to be located across from the Aspen Club on Ute Avenue, . Aspen, Colorado. The project site is shown on Fig. 1. The purpose of the study was to develop recommendations for the foundation design. The study was conducted in accordance with our agreement for geotechnical engineering ser- vices to Aspen Properties, dated November 22, 1989. A field exploration program consisting of exploratory borings was con- - ducted to obtain information on subsurface conditions. Samples obtained during the field exploration were tested in the laboratory to determine their engineering characteristics. The results of the field exploration and labora- tory testing were analyzed to develop recommendations for foundation types, depths and allowable pressures for the proposed building foundation. The results of the field exploration and laboratory testing are presented in the report. This report has been prepared to summarize the data obtained during this study and to present our conclusions and recommendations based on the proposed construction and the subsoil conditions encountered. Design parameters and a - discussion of geotechnical engineering considerations related to construction of the proposed project are included in the report. r A '4â€¢e//401 /:0' I'l|'/Allk/144**/*fiâ€¢,IiÂ·+Â·Â· - I . PROPOSED CONSTRUCTION The proposed multi-family housing will be a two-story wood frame struc- ture with a building footprint of approximately 60 feet by 80 feet. The ground floor level will be structural over a crawl space or slab-on-grade. Grading for the structure is expected to be relatively minor with cut depths between about 4 to 8 feet. We assume relatively light foundation loadings, typical of the proposed type construction. If building loadings, location or grading plans change significantly from those described above, we should be notified to reevaluate the recommendations contained in this report. SITE CONDITIONS At the time of our field work, the site was vacant and covered with about 2 feet of snow. The topography of the building envelope is moderately sloping down to the northeast at grades of 15 to 20 percent. The slope steepens to the south of the building area. The steep slopes above the site have been characterized as having snow avalanche potential on the Pitkin County Snow Avalanche map by Colorado State University (1974) and on the Environmental and Geologic Constraints map prepared for the Colorado Geological Survey (1974). There are historic avalanche tracks located on the Hoag Subdivision to the west of the subject site. We are not aware of historic avalanches that have impacted the project site. The proposed building area is vegetated with small aspen trees, brush and weeds. An old overgrown cart path crosses the building area from east to L west. -I -R- FIELD EXPLORATION The field exploration for the project was conducted on December 21 and 22, 1989. Two exploratory borings were drilled at the locations shown on Fig. 1 to evaluate the subsurface conditions. The borings were advanced with 4-inch diameter continuous flight augers powered by a truck-mounted CME-55 drill rig. The borings were logged by a representative of Chen-Northern, Inc. Samples of the subsoils were taken with a 1 3/8-inch I.D. spoon sampler. The sampler was driven into the subsoils at various depths with blows from a 140-pound hammer falling 30 inches. This test is similar to the standard penetration test described by ASTM Method D-1586. The penetration resistance values are an indication of the relative density or consistency of the sub- soils. Depths at which the samples were taken and the penetration resistance values are shown on the Logs of Exploratory Borings, Fig. 2. The samples were returned to our laboratory for review by the project engineer and testing. - SUBSOIL CONDITIONS The subsoil conditions encountered at the site are shown graphically on Fig. 2. The subsoils consist of about 2 to 4 feet of topsoil overlying mainly medium dense, silty sand and gravel containing cobbles and possible boulders. Drilling in the gravels with auger equipment was difficult due to the cobbles - and boulders and drilling refusal was encountered in the deposit. Laboratory testing performed on samples obtained from the borings included natural moisture content and gradation analyses. Results of grada- tion analyses performed on small diameter drive samples (minus 1 1/2-inch fraction) of the natural coarse granular soils are shown on Fig. 4. The - laboratory testing is summarized in Table I. t/ l No free water was encounterea in the borings at the time of drilling and the subsoils were slightlv moist te mA - c r FOUNDA TION RECOMMENDATIONS Considering the subscil nen,44 4.-Â·"ne ov,n,Â·Â·Â·Â·lin'+O*0,1 '1 +Ao eXplarat-'n"li hAr-ir,rÂ·re &â€¢1&-U'*AW-. &- -. 4 V..~- ;- #VV. J 'W. .....Cr, . and the nature of the proposed construction, we recommend the building be founded with spread footings bearing on the natural granular soils. The design and construction criteria presented below should be observed 1 for a spread footing foundation system. The construction criteria should be considered when preparing project documents. 1 1) Footings placed on the undisturbed natural granular soils should be designed for an allowable soil bearing pressure of 3000 psf. Based on experience, we expect settlement of footings designed and constructed as discussed in this section will be about 1 inch or less. 1 2) All existing topsoil and any loose or disturbed soils should be removed and the footing bearing level excended down to relatively dense natural granular soils. 3) The footings should have a minimum width of 16 inches for continuous walls and 2 feet for isolated pads. 1 4) Exterior footings and footings beneath unheated areas should be provided with adequate soil cover above their bearing elevation for frost protec- tion. Placement of foundations at least 42 inches below exterior grade is typically used in this area. 5) Continuous foundation walls should be reinforced top and bottom to span an unsupported length of at least 10 feet. Foundation walls acting as retaining structures should also be designed to resist a lateral earth -- +/ pressure corresponding to an equivalent fluid unit weight of 45 pcf. 1 1 1 -5- 6) Sliding resistance of the footing on the bearing soil can be taken as 0.4 times the dead load weight on the foundation. 7) A representative of the soil engineer should observe all footing excava- tions prior to concrete placement to evaluate bearing conditions. FLOOR SLABS The natural on-site soils exclusive of topsoil are suitable to support lightly to moderately loaded slab-on-grade construction. To reduce the effects of some differential movement, floor slabs should be separated from all bearing walls and columns with expansion joints which allow unrestrained vertical movement. Floor slab control joints should be used to reduce damage due to shrinkage cracking. The requirements for control joints and slab reinforcement should be established by the designer based cn experience and the intended slab use. A minimum 4-inch layer of free-draining gravel should be placed beneath basement level slabs to facilitate drainage. This material should consist of minus 2-inch aggregate with less than 50% passing the No. a sieve and less than 2% passing the No. 200 sieve. All fill materials for support of floor slabs should be compacted to at . least 95% of maximum standard Proctor density at a moisture content near 1 optimum. Required fill can consist of the onisite sand and gravel devoid of -1 vegetation, topsoil and oversized rock. 1 UNDERDRAIN SYSTEM Although free water was not encountered during our exploration, it has been our experience in mountainous areas that local perched groundwater may develop during times of heavy precipitation or seasonal runoff. Frozen ground during spring runoff can create a perched condition. We recommend below grade . -'J- construction, such as retaining walls, crawl space and basement areas be protected from wetting and hydrostatic pressure buildup by an underdrain system. The drains should consist of drain tile placed in the bottom of the wall backfill surrounded above the invert level with free-draining granular mate- rial. The drain should be placed at least 1 foot below lowest adjacent finish grade and sloped at a minimum 1% to a suitable gravity outlet. Free-draining granular material used in the underdrain system should contain less than 2% passing the No. 200 sieve, less than 50% passing the No. 4 sieve and have a maximum size of 2 inches. The drain gravel backfill should be at least 2 feet deep. SURFACE DRAINAGE - The following drainage precautions should be observed during construction and maintained at all times after the building has been completed: 1) Inundation of the foundation excavations and underslab areas should be avoided during construction. 2) Exterior backfill should be adjusted to near optimum moisture and com- pacted to at least 95% of the maximum standard Proctor density in pavement and slab areas and to at least 90% of the maximum standard Proctor density in landscape areas. 3) The ground surface surrounding the exterior of the building should be sloped to drain away from the foundation in all directions. We recommend a minimum slope of 12 inches in the first 10 feet in unpaved areas and a minimum slope of 3 inches in the first 10 feet in paved areas. It may be : necessary to create a swale on the uphill side of the building to route surface water around and away from the development. 7 -- 4) Roof downspouts and drains should discharge well beyond the limits of all backfill. LIMITATIONS This report has been prepared in accordance with generally accepted soil and foundation engineering practices in this area for use by the client for design purposes. The conclusions and recommendations submitted in this report are based upon the data obtained from the exploratory borings drilled at the locations indicated on Fig. 1 and the proposed type of construction. The nature and extent of subsurface variations across the site may not become evident until excavation is penformed. If during construction, fill, soil, rock or water conditions appear to be different from those described herein, this office should be advised at once so reevaluation of the recommendations may be made. We recommend on-site observation of excavations and foundation bearing strata and testing of structural fill by a representative of the soil engineer. Sincerely, tiwill'111/4,1 ~S@<00 REG/ 0.44 CHEN-NORTHERN, INC. 4. 2- 24443 j :- ~1 - (f le,1-4 = By u' 0--- 9%:Â·. ..Â°f~ Daniel E. Hardin, P.E. "{#,11 3'3/0 NAL %> ,SS> 1; 1.1/Uilibl, WMMWA Reviewed By =51 v~ 9 Steven L. Pawiak, P.E. DEH/ec cc: David Finholm & Associates, Attn: David Finholm Â¢#mA"11111,1. APPROXIN,A SCALE '' ASPE 1 1 1 = 16 / / / 1-- / / PROPERTY i ~BOUNDARIES - -- / - \ -Ill - ./*. / .\1/ /// , UTE AVENUE -- --- - RIGHT OF WAY a EASEMENT LINE -* -1 BORING 2 - -- - - -.I--- / --- - - - -2'rp 9030 M -------------- ---- --- - -- - - - -- 1 - -- ----I - ----I- -/ , , -- - I. BUILDING - ENVELOPE ~ - - BORING I #-- - - -/ 0.-* 004 0 // ---- ~- --/ a-b- -- -- --- - - -- - -- 4 188 go Chen#Northern.Inc. LOCATION OF EXPLORATORY BORINGS Fig. I Boring 1 Boring 2 Flev. = 8040' Elev. = 8028' 8()40 8040 D,.9 8035 8035 SPK .'0 ~24/12 ~ WC = 4 2+4=43 ~ -200=16 8030 0..A- , 8030 Â©~ 25/5,20/0 P:. .. 534 - 4& '4/0 8025 8025 D /-/ RE 32/12 Q.,1 8(}2() 40/12 8020 ~+4=51 WC=3 -200=12 8015 8015 T Note: Explanation of symbols presented on Fig. 3. 9() Chen#Northern,Inc Logs of Exploratory Borings Fig. LEGEND: ~ Topsoil; organic silty sand and gravel, with cobbles, loose to medium dense, moist, black. FE Sand and Gravel (GM); silty, with cobbles, possible boulders, medium dense to l:71 dense, moist, brown. ~ !)rive sample; standard penetration test (SPT), 1 3/8-inch I.D. split spoon sample, ASTM D-1586. ' 24/12 Drive sample blow count; indicates that 24 blows of a 140-pound hammer falling 30 inches were required to drive the SPT sampler 12 inches. --~- Practical rig refusal. NOTES: 1. Exploratory borings were drilled on December 21 and 22, 1989 with a 4-inch diameter continuous flight power allger. 2. Locations of exploratory horings were measured approximately by taping from features shown on the site plan provided. 3. Elevations of exploratory borings were obtained by interpolation between contours on the site plan provided. 4. The exploratory boring locations and elevations should he considered accurate only to the degree implied by the method used. 5. The lines between materials shown on the exploratory boring logs represent the approximate locations between material types and transitions may be gradual. 6. No free water was encountered in the horings at the time of drilling. Fluctu- ations in water level may occur with time. 7. Laboratory Testing Results: WC = Water Content (%) +4 = Percent retained on No. 4 sieve -200 = Percent passing No. 200 sieve 4 188 9{) Chen#Northern, Inc Legend and Notes Fig. 3 . 1 HYDROMETER ANAL v S SIEVE ANA 3 TIME READINGS U S STANOAAO SEAIES CLEAR SQUARE OPENtNGS Â£ 24..A 7 H R .10 4 5 MIN 1 5 11 N 50 MIN 19 MIN 4 MIN 1 M IN ' 7 30 Â·60 -40 Â·00 -Â·6 1.9 -4 r 5'- 8' V 0 100 1 1 . 1 1 11 1.0 90; 1 i il ' :120 1 . 1 ~ t . 'i:.: 1 7 1 1 1140 60; : 1 .1 / 1 /r 1 1 1/ T 50; ' . 1 1 ':,W li I , 11 1 / 1 1 , 1 / 1, 1 1 11 e Lr 402 1 1 1 z fl ~ li ~ ' ' ~~w 1 11 1 1 3 1 1 L 'i i Ii,1 212\.i. 2101 //& 1 1 11 1 to: 1 111 1 1 ' it 1 01 1 1 1,;lili , 11 I l!111 i I {JOI 002 DOS 009 019 UJ/ 0/4 149 291 ~1~5~ ~~ ~1|19 !238 4 ~6' ' 'M2 1~1 38~1 ! 1~~1 12~1120(~~*, 152 42 2 0 DIAMETER OF PARTICLE IN MILLIMETERS SAND GRAVEL COBBLES CLAY TO SILT FINE | MEDIUM |CO AnSE 1 FINâ‚¬ 1 COARSE GAAVEL 43 $ SAND 41 % SILT AND CLAY 16 % X $ LIQUID LIMIT PLASTICITY INDEX SAMPLE OF Silty sand and gravel FROM Boring 1 at 6 feet and 10 feet combined HYDROMETER ANALYSIS SIEVE ANALYSIS ~ l IME REAL.JINGS US S T AN[I) AAD SCIAJES CLEAH SOUAAE OPENINGS ~ 24 'l;4 7 )4 10 45 MIN li MIN 50 MIN 19 MIN 4 MIN 1 MIN Â·7tÂ¥1 . 100 Â·50 Â·40Â·10 Â·TS 1Â·8 . = 4 y," t '4 3" 5 6 1 ~ ~ ,t 40 ii 11:1 Iii il. 1 116 1 1 1 :10 ! 1 1 : / 1 A T;31 1 F I ~ 1 1 1 1 111 '' 1 11 1,1 JIll 1 1 , f 1 11 1 '' 1 '20 1 ' 11 j'Â§ 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 i i ' 1 , 11 1/ , 1 ! . i 1 l , 1 1 1 1 11 1 1 j 1 |Â· , I '' I '|r , 5,0/n 50, 1 'rri 1 1 , 1 : : il, I .1: 1 1. Â· i I ' ~60 ' i i i , ,! 1 1/ 11 1 1 1 ! 1 1 1 11 , ' i 1 I 1 ].,0 1 1 11 7/1 30! i i '!1 I /1 r 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 $ 1 1 1 / i J I! 1 :1,[1/111 11 1 1 1 1, M 11 1 5 -, 190 10; 1 1 : ' 1 11 : 1 lili 1 lili m 1 1 I lilli 1 1 It 1 1 MIl ' 1 1 1 1 11 '11 1 111 1 111! , U 1 1 #11 1 1100 001 002 005 009 019 03, 0/4 149 297 I 590 1 19 9 38 4 16 9.52 19 1 38 1 16 2 121 200 152 42 2 0 - DIAMETER OF PARTICLE IN MILLIMETERS 1 1 SAND GRAVEL CLAY TO SILT COBBLES } INE W DIUM |COAâ€žSE , INF | COARSE i GAAVEL El '6 SAND 37 94 SILT AND CLAY 12 % 04 LIQUID LIMIT PLASTICITY INDEX SAMPLE OF silty s and and grave 1 FAOM Boring 2 at 8 feet 1 188 on Chen@Northern.Inc. GRADATION TEST RESULTS Fig. 1 PERCENT PASSING OJNIÂ¥igH 1N33U3d , IN 33W34 PEACENT PASSING TABLE I SUMMARY OF LABORATORY TEST RESULTS bAWN f KIX.AtION 14 na N r GRADAIION â€žAlt)nAL NArt RAL AT 1[ Im[ nG L lull S 'INCONf ILIED MOIS1ljlI[ (,nY 1'4:5111<1 COMPAESSIVE So Il I )1 * DE P/,1 CONIENI DENSITY SANI) sltvÂ£ 11{Alll) |'LASTIC:llY DED'"K.,1 1,1,1 BOMIN. 6"AvEl 1Â·,10 2,MI S"UNGill Ite.11 ,--6, *PC:fl A N 1 1,-411 INIJ[* 'ths,1 1-.1 1.-1 I 6 6 10 1 4 43 41 silty sand 6 gravel combined 16 2 8 3 51 37 12 silty sand f gravel 1 Y â€¢ Recorded at *365855 01/1,/94 11:01 Hee $5.00 En '39 Pe 30 t.>- - Reception No. Silvia F *is, Pitkin Cnty Clerk, Di $60.62 WARRANTY DEED THIS DEED, Made this 12th day of January ~ , 19 94. between Ute Park Partnership, LTD. , a Colorado 2 1 limited partnership , and State of C.Â· i 1 of the ' County 01 Pitkin f f '.to Colorado, grantor, and Win Win Enterprises, L.L.C. *Â·L ;19Â·42'TI 1 11 4 04 4 whose legal address is 317 Park Avenue, Aspen, CO 81611 ) bl_., County 01 Pitkin and >,tate 01 Colorado. grantee g i. of the -37 WITNESSETH, That the grantor tor and in consideration 01 the illin 01 SIX HUNDRED SIX THOUSAND TWO HUNDRED FIFTY AND NO/100----------($606,250.00) [)()LLARS. the receipt and sufticiency ot' u'hich th hereby acknowledged, hax granted. haiÂ·gained. wId :ind con#Â·>cd. .ind b) th:Ne pre.enth doe. Frant. bargain. bell. convey and contirm. unto the grantee. his heirs and assignh torever. all the real property together w i th unprovement* . i f arn. ~tuate. 1>:111% and be Ing In the '.' I it County of Pitkin and State of Coloradu de,cribed aa, tollou N 001 Lot 2, n 51 UTE PARK SUBDIVISION, according to the Plat thereof, filed February 22, 1993, in Plat Book p 30 at Page 86. 7. 1 5 U' T 'H EW El Irtl 7 W 0 -1, U ah known by street and number as: 1275 Ute Avenue, Aspen, CO 81611 - TOGETHER with all und wngular the hereditament; ,ind appurlendlice. thereto belonging. 111 m an,u ik appertaining. and the reverjion and ~ reverhionA. Irmainder and remainders. Knts. ihsue. und pri,lit. thetrut. .Ind lili the ev.tle. light. tide. wterc.l. claim und demand uhalhoever of the 0 grantor. either m lau fir equitv. 01. in and lo the above h.irc.wic,1 13,wil.c. ulth ille hercilit.t!~~enl. md appultenanceÂ·, ,= TO HAVE AND TO HOLD the said premise, abuve bargatned and dexribed. u ith thic appurtenance#. untu ihe grantee. huh Icir. .ind a,hign, 17, forever. And the grantor, for himself, his hears, and personal representalive,. doeb covenant,grant, bargain.and agree to and with the grantee. hi , helrb and assigns. that at the time of the ensealing and dell very of these presents. he 8 well seized of the pre nilheh above con veved. haJ good. .ure. perlect. absolute and indefeasible estate ofinheritance, in law, in tee simple, and ha, good right. full powei und la. ful authorii> to giant. bargain. *ell .Ind Conve> the same in manner and form as aforesaid. and that the same are tree and clear trom all tunnel and other gram.. bargain>.. sale,. her.. 1.1.\Ch. .t.NCMmenth. encumbrances and rewnctions of whatever kind or nature ,oever. ercept those easements, reservations, restric- tions and other matters of record; AND EXCEPT general real estate taxes for 1994 and subsequent years which, after adjustment and proration as of the day hereof, Grantee assumes and agrees to pay. The grantor shall and will WARRANT AND FOREVER DEFEND the above-bargained premises in the quiet and peaceable posseshion oi the grantee, his heirs and assigns, against all and every person or persons lawfully claiming the whole or any part thereof. The singular number shall include the plural, the plural the singular, and the use of any gender shall be applicable to all genders. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the grantor has executed this deed on the date ,(1*rth above , 3/1 1 (1 14-'.-/ JAMyS T. MARTIN, General Partner of Ute Park Partnership. LTD.. a Colorado limited partnership STKni 01- COLORADO County of P itkin f.. The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this 14th day of January tv 94 , General Pa r by James T. Martin aaijage,x di~-~ae Ute Park Partnership, Ltd., a Colorado limited p@2Ae:Rhip 9 - 1 L~ 1 9 E< ~, Wltne- ImÂ· hand and o!!icial wai A , 1 (1!=13 1\ p 44-u }1- 41 53 2 1 80:81: r'--h J Notary Publ~c 4 As\L jet Name and Address of Person Creating Newly Created 1,egal Descnption (Â§ 38-35-106.5. C. R.S ) 'Â·haÂ·ret>" No. 932A. Rev. 7-84. WARRANTY DEED (For Photographic Record) ATC 403158 , Bradford Publiffing. 1741 Wiwee St . Denver. C O K{)202 - 4.3(n) 292Â·3500- I]-91 1 U 043 \ THEODORE K GUY ASSOCIATES PC [l=[EFFEÂ® Â®[F lf[EAR]6[@ OFFAIL ARCHITECTS & STRUCTURAL ENGINEERS P.O. Box 1640 23280 State Highway 82 Basalt, Colorado 81621 . DATE JOB No/-3 2//0/9 9 (fa/72- (303) 927-3167 FAX (303) 927-4813 ATTEN~ION MtÂ»rjoilÂ»mk. T~ Arm ifi-#*iu Ogynm wvtd-Lt CÂ»40,4- U) fjlk..QMY;404)4+~d.al,u - 1 9 4+M 02(241 0, 9 . 0) t t V WE ARE SENDING YOU bettached O Under separate cover via the following items: 0 Shop drawings 8 Prints C] Plans D/ C] Samples El Specifications C] Copy of letter El Change order 4- /\ 16.1 Al.Dul I -1 C~Es F~313 NO. DESCRIPTION Â»016 l -9 + Y 9:ik PliA cd AuroÂ« A . *-Â· 1 Ate/79/ litfrUM B S 6-04*0 <1 -AOti - L 1 -8%04 Makbol '83,64*-ect , <99Â· 3 ~ FEB 1 5 1995 ~ ~ 164 2 8124(eh en a) 81112*57t d . Mlt<1- F*9-crl aft 44,411,5 *-- 9-4 f tiÂ·, ELOP':5 ''T / 4.94 Â·EE!19-17 THESE ARE TRANSMITTED as checked below: m For approval U Approved as submitted U Resubmit copies for approval C] For your use [3 Approved as noted E Submit copies for distribution m ~ requested m Returned for corrections 0 Return corrected prints Â»er review and comment E] J CJ F~R BIDS DUE 19 m PRINTS RETURNED AFTER LOAN TO US REMARKS h-i KM , V 1 1, 44 is >3 makria[ LAA- peu icl /ike--4 Auk,ptif- 90 9%49 - c#may tk_trk ,AÂ·*j u_3 P #0~,Wrt -tb Y14 063-4 br/u-/ Cler /kja, 1.41 f Pul 91(111 (1*16, cÂ¥/blit KN-Ant 44Â¥ yari-4-y*atk- , A eÂ«,QU of-(/ ao " . /L--g-1-e. (41-- /91Lk,-to,F ; f *1 fli 8 0007* PB An Ke J/2*9 A-of 4Â·wit 0*te.le,-e Â«f- 47 r liurkmÂ« 1 Â«A.42 COPY TO 90â„¢ \4nvurnatw~,lffI'MaKMd miÂ© 1--1 t~-'~~0~,.. ~ 40% Pre-Consumer Content â€¢ 10% Post-Consumer Content SIGN~ED Al C d>C~U#"Mf k<1 If enclosures are not as noted, kindly noWr-â‚¬15--at once. PRODUCT 240 ,Â®Â¥**7 In, Groton, Mas, 01471. set=>-i:4.Â£7101,4 -1--1-- liy Nt -/4 l:j. ~ ,:- - V 1 / willflu nk,Ur 1 11 11 1 ' I -\1 71 PDRIERE:%66. ~ r FT,1 Â».- 1 -2.02310=122 1 =E=18/ ---thmirt "'1~' 11 l li 1 11\ 100= / r ./ ,- T. :*s- 429Â»14.L 11 3/ 94>61 -2-cALL Ckek .4- au/, 9%, i 1 A j / St-- / iii 4..Fâ„¢ 1 3%004 0<=C- /2 -3MEL_~----~LIcâ€ž:= I r 1. ,1 1 9 I h 4 ' pr-,5, , 4 0-'./fil.r; f. -//41'3(-*.... 10.00' , il 1/ M.!O//PE# / M- ,.) F=r t1 , \ -<43> - R.1 ' 7102 - En u, 1 /ir--- r--l~i1 -er \, â„¢4,=>Cl. 12,1107 " A F. kit ' bcat> MI . y \\ \UP *36 2 2Â»:p-/ // 2 :4 - 4 'dre 1- 4 Â«S-*9 -1 -~- â€ž , --4- _ 40& r V 2-\ -*.A.~#,p Y.(29~ / /0~'27/ (-13 _L.-31=:I= Ijzl. j t=-*1<1-1-- T - 6043.'12 LE=LIa,r. 4 Fras: f 1 7 4-QUI=juÂ»Â«(21 4 -ru - 1 . 1 / f ./ I-I'.--''--(2. â‚¬ 8=6.6.11 - 2 , 12.3 10-E 1 - A 1 033) 2" 1 r ; 7 â€ž ; 1 . 4 2 4 (63 292.4 +SPed 114 -13 1 .- .517 -_ -. god-6. 9 1 Fm - ' T 2,2-3- g. 2 / --.LERES.~*LL. ' ~-1 _C[I-bL.~TRIE-2:li=61krr- 4- 7 f /0 / 9 .' - SEED E-LOPE. 111-TH 80 , .1 -ty 1,, - ~ 9- tz:nt.'a.-17 R // //f & . 1 0,~ 7. - -,--~ 1 -- NA-TIVE. (N~Â©65 3134 .id: i HdrgAP-f Â£-14*11*2- 0 - 27- , b Â«' -1 , 1-FEE-2, b , / 422. >\ . Lfâ‚¬/Ut /2 - 1 2- 1 , \ # 4 .// \ + 2 .#-, e . . 1. - r \\4\ , r /~ / , / _ \ \ 11 t991; I=- - - - i X i %4 % --litz--r5Ft: 1 : aLTA-- \ -- . / t. - .i , (-5-- SITE PLAN AS PROPOSED >> 43> 0 1" /10'-0" THEODORE K GUÂ¥ ASSOCIATES PC DRAFNN : 119 FYINNERMAN RESIDENCE SHEET : ARCHITECTS AND STRUCTURAL ENeINEERS LOT 2 CHECKEP : P.O. BOX 1640 UTE PARK SUBDIVISION 23230 STATE HIGHMAY 32 ASPEN, CO 1 OF5 BASALT, COLORADO 01621 (303) 92-1-916-7 ISSUED 2-q-cla JOB # 931-72 A :Ir-' 0 - - - ./7'W / -' lâ€¢ Poop .9 / beFEN ...../.- .....# 3,1,Â© * ~ M\D-VT / Â£ FIR 93"CÂ»L. \\- k 3,0;1 R.Â° 5 2, D M.10 FE - PE=TUIG, \ \ %'ff- - 80 95.63 864Â·& u~'C- j 7 60Â·zte 10.00' A -K, i lili \ loa'./ 1 MII Â· ... -TU h~ EC>46. ED r - 1.- 91 b it 6 3.5 4// .$. . I 1 4 VELÂ·Â·0~~\ V#14.k --Ch \\ 20*392 LE=YEW'R \ .- I -I FOWEE;206& aom 8 2.M -44 (120 ID-12' ker- 0/--- T/".2 4,/ f, 1,4 1 1 \ 4'ft' 4% Â»6FE.Kt -74/ *0 1 . \:2 .1-W : 413 3 2 " - L ! - 020 <5" <cAL i 1 0, ,-CX=r-) ~-54- .. E-,454#:/iLE< - f. G#1 lepeL 5 a '' . I A \\ Juj U.6- , CMÂ«LIGHT- 7 RET: R>04-3., A - PX PÂ¢24.1 N - 1 FIR . * 0 v '0Â¤L CÂ»71.16+47 r 11 (11) bLaw e CLI _ 7F~14_31 AINAGE / Mil \W Alv , 99 . 80,11 Â»S . 01. - 'OU- -- 1, . 111 - CO - h. 222,67 , JU ' , Â£15 4 f k 'b-3 1 -I G - N 4*/CY' 27- W _ 5 k - .--- -I- V. --- - **#--p S-*-- -..P---I - --7~ 04 -2--*~*7-Tn 61&14#QFPEAL_VER-A V - _ _ f]31--s-2-LacED t//.61--7,4, 6--1-UN 925~7-'723% ft-O~.EZ ~ ~ 1 -Â»SchEEÂ©ED iD Chtr@:14 ~ Sup l EN15Â·.+Er- INTIE 2/44 - 1 ~ 1,71/- Li 1-r 1 - MA // <14 - \ -~* SW-Ular -3~~ Â°05JI~~' \ \ 9,1 SITE PLAN AS APPROVED 0 1" /10'-O" SHEET : THEODORE K SUY ASSOCIATES PC - ORAVYN : 12 MINNERMAN RESIDENCE SHEET : ARCHITECTS AND STRUCT'l.1Â£41- ENOINEERS ROOF: - LOT 2 ~ CHECKED : P.O. BOX 1640 UTE PARK SUBDIVISION 2of 5 E MAX. AL 23250 STATE HleHFNAÂ¥ 32 ASPEN, 00 AT MID- BASALT, COLORADO 51621 (303) 927-310-1 )0 8C ISSUED 2-q-'15 JOB # 931-12 20 80 70 80 21 BC ~-ZEOR 'EX-C.â€¢L./ .KL~CIT,L A.L. L.2,6 -7?UM. 32â€¢Cr- 09 72*TURE. 7-/ - - 9.4,â€¢4.1 19â€¢-c..... t. _,Â·.i'OE /--CAL : Â·2Â·, Â· LÂ«52 /CXLZC/r/L 1 11../ r-1 MASCNRY VE>IEER I EM.ALL. rrCÂ«.Zeâ„¢TAL. = 2~ ~ râ‚¬XO elIÂ»46. r S 5/ 5' EXPCÂ·EUâ€¢UJ 7'P. 1 6/4,6 C.=24/Ni T.92/. 74- ./O. /0/ //597Ft/0. 1 - Â«Â» 4- 7 2 /:LIT .94<2 M.OCF'â€¢16.7'-. 141Â« / / /.2.i X- / ~ /VI F---- L Fl=i- 1 E- ~ id\ 9 -; 6 -7 5.4.02 5,016. 0 6/al.3 905. O :/r ExPO Flf) -Pr, 1 - ="_-MAS-=f -1 & FILÂ«1 El{*f ae<Lk1 1 1 , ' Vih Y : - 01. - LCF- 1 e / Ti , , \\Â£- 1/ E 1 / / ./ ' 1 -r,!3 ' .7 'Cd#Pr, 11.--/ 11 '6464 1 1 N~ .1 4 /Net*>~-7 ~-/ PLASHING ' ' / Al --St \ 1 3 - 9 - 1 -1 h <64\\0-,- LOFÂ·r 1/ Â·2 u / /.22225Â»Â« Nzkc><C--/ 1 - r'-r-WASTÂ·Ex ;r 1/ \r 1 4% / \>1 4 /5521 2041 \44\ 1 7-7.1 --utÂ».4-2-- ./.333555.-- is.1-/5.--C.f;11,2.UÂ» Ir,1.. 1 7 Â°L-eÂ» 2 :=1/ . .9 3 3 33) 1 1 li'. .,ap~ H==-ak - r. Â°L-L"!Ne 0 1 1, 1 4/,9 1 .V 9/ 1 7 7,4!CK) STCNE 1=21 -*.--/ CaL 3,â€¢SE, Tr FÂ». kt. 1 1 1 \ 1/1 1 I F:C /, f r f 14 F \CLP.2 -77 -.= 2 & L i. i I 'r CQ- nICK; 9-CNE L -,T/1 ' '4 // 8 7, F'Lv-ECfy 1_ L..>-P'-i.:j .7.-111 2 =.4. SCRBEL - -- -v-- ,i'-1 - - - ---- 1# . , ' - , // 11// \ \ 4 t i .- 7 .1-7-L.ViNG 1 60,/1 0.-f - - i, C I ~ I 1 ' 1 1 Â· Â· -Il' - ; (12- '416*J LE--~ USNE UNTEL. L T '- *fa 4 sa l, sa 129! Il I i *@11. , 7 - - -1- i --% / . .. CCURS-CD MASCORV f~-- v ENEER, 777' 1 1 k-4.Â«1 3 =:1 11 1 IE -14_- t 71~ 2 11 1 IM U 1 1?E/- I #~-432 - , ~ 7 91.-Aa-'190 ' it 1 T. Â£ 4.Aj 0-â‚¬ >r< -7- 71' =St EAST ELEVATION AS APPROVED 4/_ / 0 1/8" /1'-0" THEODORE K SUÂ¥ ASSOCIATES PC DRAAN : 1.P MINNERMAN RESIDENCE SHEET : ARCHITECTS AND STRUCTURAL ENeINEERS LOT 2 CHECKED : P.O. BOX 1640 UTE PARK SUBDIVISION 23200 STATE HIGHKAÂ¥ 32 ASPEN, CO 4of 5 BASALT, COLORADO 31621 (803) 92-1-3167 ISSUED 2-q-C 3 JOB # 98172 CL 1 c'K-Â·NW /4 / El- ?1453 lÂ«NL.49 / tu 5\ f â€¢k r y,\ k TRY<. \ /.A r' r /1 4. 8 --7/ 01 -21*4640'.~ y ,41 Lb' - - -*Ji JIM \ = SITE SECTION 1 It <~FL) 0 1/N /1.-O. ' r~ 1 . \<. 1 1/-y- 3 Â°*-" SITE SECTION 3 L/%-,-,116--,-6 2 4. 0 1/2>* /1'-0 I rZL-h (W,44 .C= ~==4 SITE SECTION 2 O 1/5" /1'-O" THEODORE K SUÂ¥ ASSOCIATES PC DRAAN : 12 MINNERMAN RESIDENCE SHEET : ARCHITECTS AND STRUCTURAL ENeINEERS L-OT 2 CHECKED : P.O. BOX 1640 UTE FARK SUBDIVISION 23250 STATE HISHMAY 32 ASPEN, CO 5(F 5 BASALT, COLORADO 01621 (303) 927-3167 ISSUED> 2-q-q5 -108 # 93172 . .4 i . r? -,i - . 27-9- 1./ ' ~, .: 40.-11 A. --- r... ; 9."- 8071,0 T. gl 941 g UY 2 M. epe ti F*OM 5 0072,0 7. Flt;121 B â‚¬ te gl,1 47 3 ..1*11,4. 4.1.; 002,0, 6 , L 1; 1<1001 ta N 2 RAFEAE!2 Â·51-01Net 1*'Al N11101 ij 0064, 6 P fie t'-1-gkÂ·~1 0 2 %068 . 0 1 BMIr 142- -- -- -- -- --- 60â‚¬ 14,44 9--7,Â¢.34 8?*: Â·:t 204Â· 1 -id 4.... '. '' WI , 5,302 Gr' i . .. .. . . . 1 - . - %. t. . . -... .. .... - -.1 ./ 4. . "' / . -0--, ..4 last .4 -*- i . 11 . ..... .. A -. . . a. I. k -- '11 4 â€¢4 . -- =0 -0 - . 1"111. fo .. I.*2. 9%411-/St - I.< . Â· 4%44/3 t/~*0~> , , ly =34* ...F . 1 - ' 1.1: a . I r . 0 ..... - .. I. . 5.- I , A . I ... 2.'AÂ·