Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
agenda.hpc.20230201
AGENDA ASPEN HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION February 1, 2023 4:30 PM, City Council Chambers 427 Rio Grande Place Aspen, CO 81611 I.ROLL CALL II.MINUTES II.A Draft Minutes - 1/11/23 III.PUBLIC COMMENTS IV.COMMISSIONER MEMBER COMMENTS V.DISCLOSURE OF CONFLICT OF INTEREST VI.PROJECT MONITORING VI.A Project Monitoring list VII.STAFF COMMENTS VIII.CERTIFICATE OF NO NEGATIVE EFFECT ISSUED IX.CALL UP REPORTS X.SUBMIT PUBLIC NOTICE FOR AGENDA ITEMS XI.OLD BUSINESS XII.NEW BUSINESS XII.A315 E. Hyman, Minor, Commercial Design and View Plane Review- CONTINUE PUBLIC HEARING TO MARCH 8TH Special Meeting minutes.hpc.20230111_DRAFT.docx PROJECT MONITORING.doc 1 XII.B1020 E. Cooper Avenue – Final Major Development, PUBLIC HEARING XIII.ADJOURN XIV.NEXT RESOLUTION NUMBER HPC Final Memo_1020 E. Cooper.pdf Resolution No. X (Series of 2023)_1020 E. Cooper.pdf Exhibit A_HP Guidelines Criteria.pdf Exhibit B_Application.pdf TYPICAL PROCEEDING FORMAT FOR ALL PUBLIC HEARINGS (1 Hour, 10 Minutes for each Major Agenda Item) 1. Declaration of Conflicts of Interest (at beginning of agenda) 2. Presentation of proof of legal notice (at beginning of agenda) 3. Applicant presentation (20 minutes) 4. Board questions and clarifications of applicant (5 minutes) 5. Staff presentation (5 minutes) 6. Board questions and clarifications of staff (5 minutes) 7. Public comments (5 minutes total, or 3 minutes/ person or as determined by the Chair) 8. Close public comment portion of hearing 9. Applicant rebuttal/clarification (5 minutes) 10. Staff rebuttal/clarification (5 minutes) End of fact finding. Chairperson identifies the issues to be discussed. 11. Deliberation by the commission and findings based on criteria commences. No further input from applicant or staff unless invited by the Chair. Staff may ask to be recognized if there is a factual error to be corrected. If the item is to be continued, the Chair may provide a summary of areas to be restudied at their discretion, but the applicant is not to re-start discussion of the case or the board’s direction. (20 minutes) 12. Motion Updated: November 15, 2021 2 REGULAR MEETING HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION JANUARY 11TH, 2023 Chairperson Thompson opened the regular meeting of the Aspen Historic Preservation Commission at 4:30pm. Commissioners in attendance: Jeffrey Halferty, Roger Moyer, Peter Fornell, Jodi Surfas, Barb Pitchford and Kara Thompson. Staff present: Amy Simon, Planning Director Jim True, City Attorney Mike Sear, Deputy City Clerk MINUTES: Mr. Moyer motioned to approve the minutes from 11/16/22. Ms. Thompson seconded. Ms. Pitchford said she would be abstaining, as she was not at the 11/16/22 meeting. Roll call vote: Mr. Fornell, yes; Mr. Moyer, yes; Ms. Surfas, yes; Mr. Halferty, yes; Ms. Thompson, yes. 5-0, motion passes. PUBLIC COMMENTS: None. COMMISSION MEMBER COMMENTS: Mr. Moyer commented about the restoration of wood, metal, and stone. He referenced an article from Bowling Green State University. Ms. Thompson asked Ms. Simon if there was an update from the building systems consultants. Ms. Simon said that they were working on developing some insulation details that could be shared with projects as best practices. Mr. Halferty asked about enforcement efforts related to the use of mirrored glazing on historic windows. Ms. Simon said she had met with the owner’s representative of one property and the intent is to have they come before HPC if they want to keep the glazing. Ms. Thompson asked about the 205 W. Main project. Ms. Simon said the applicant had contacted the City and asked to continue to February 22nd. Ms. Simon went over the upcoming meeting schedule. DISCLOSURE OF CONFLICTS OF INTEREST: None. PROJECT MONITORING: 135 East Cooper Ave. Ms. Simon introduced the item and gave some details of what is front of the commissioners. The property has a historic outbuilding that is being repositioned back to what is thought to be its original location. There is also a lean-to style addition that was previously approved. She said that Ms. Thompson is the monitor on the project and that herself and Ms. Thompson were approached with a request to amend the design of the addition and both believed it did not meet the guidelines, so the request is being brought to HPC. She then highlighted a few options, noted in the memo, that HPC has on this. They can direct Ms. Thompson and Ms. Simon to approve it as staff and monitor or they could find it is not in line with the guidelines and direct them to not approve, in which case the applicant could build what has previously been approved or file for a substantial amendment that could be appealed to City Council. She then described the previously approved addition as having a flat roof that tucked under one of the eaves of the out-building and what is being proposed as having more of a hip-roofed form and would be all glass, similar to a greenhouse. She stated that her and Ms. Thompson did not believe any of the applicable guidelines were met. She went over the reasoning for this, mainly related to the REGULAR MEETING HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION JANUARY 11TH, 2023 proposed roof form of the new addition as it relates to the out-building it is being added to. There was already a big departure in terms of form, fenestration and materials and adding this roof pitch only aggravates that compatibility issue. She then introduced Ms. Sarah Adams with Bendon Adams who is representing the applicant. Ms. Adams introduced herself and Mr. Cristof Eigelberger of Eigelberger Architecture and Design. She then went over the approval history of the project and mentioned that it is under construction right now. She described their proposal to change the roof form of the addition to the secondary historic out- building. She then showed images comparing the flat roof style that was previously approved by HPC and the proposed hip-roofed style and noted that there are no other changes to the addition. She showed some historic pictures of the property and noted that the relationship that the applicant was hoping to make was with the hip-roof of the landmark building. She then showed some examples of 19th century historic greenhouses that were the inspiration on this project and described a few historic greenhouses that had existed in Aspen. Next, she went over some of the guidelines that were included in the packet and went over their reasoning of why the proposed roof form is more compatible than the flat roof. Ms. Pitchford asked for some clarification, as to her it did not appear that the new proposed roof style of the addition was tucked under the eave of the historic out-building. Ms. Adams used a drawing to show where it was tucked under. Mr. Halferty asked if the approved flat roof had any openings to which the applicant responded no. There was then some discussion clarifying what exactly was previously approved and what is being proposed. Mr. Eigelberger went back to the inspiration images of other greenhouse examples and noted that they usually are shown with a pitched roof and that is the reason they are coming back to HPC with this proposed change. There was then some discussion of the history of the property and locations of various structures that have been on it over time. Ms. Thompson noted that this was not a formal approval process, but that they were just having discussion to get an understanding of who supports the change and who doesn’t. Ms. Surfas, Mr. Fornell, Mr. Moyer, and Mr. Halferty all supported the change. Mr. Halferty went over some of the guidelines and gave comment to why he thought the proposed change complied. Ms. Pitchford said she did not support the change. She agreed with staff and saw it as very ornate, taking away from the historic resource and not being compatible with it. With the majority of members supporting the change, Ms. Simon said the applicant would now need to submit a change order to pursue the change. STAFF COMMENTS: None. CERTIFICATE OF NO NEGATIVE EFFECT: None. CALL UP REPORTS: None. SUBMIT PUBLIC NOTICE FOR AGENDA ITEMS: Ms. Simon said that the next item on the agenda did not need public notice as it was just a recommendation to City Council and not a public hearing. REGULAR MEETING HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION JANUARY 11TH, 2023 NEW BUSINESS: 216 W. Hyman Ave. – Referral Comment to City Council – Establishment of Transferable Development Rights (TDR) Staff Presentation: Amy Simon - Planning Director Ms. Simon started by mentioning that in code amendments made to the Historic Preservation Benefits some time ago, the transferable development right program was amended to say that HPC needs to make a recommendation to City Council. After this meeting they would be going to City Council at the end of this month and in late February to pursue Ms. Ann Mullins request for two TDRs. She then described some details of the property and house on it. She mentioned that Ms. Mullins has approximately 1,000 square feet of developable floor area on the site, and she would like to sell half of that as TDRs. Each TDR is 250 square feet and if City Council approves them, it only allows Ms. Mullins to proceed to create them, though she does not need to do so. Ms. Simon did mention that the TDR market is very tight and there is interest from people looking for them and those who have them are holding them tight. They would allow someone to take Ms. Mullins’ 250 square feet and build it at their house. It does not actually build it; it just gives them the right to build it. She said they are good for historic preservation, by allowing a long-time homeowner to capture some of the value in their home, reducing the pressure to add onto the existing property. Staff is supporting the creation of the two TDRs and is looking to HPC for a recommendation to City Council. Applicant Presentation: Sarah Adams – Bendon Adams Ms. Adams introduced Ms. Ann Mullins and restated her request to remove 500 square feet in the form of two TDRs which would go to City Council for the final decision. She went over some of the history of the property and mentioned that some of it was unknown. They are looking for HPC’s support. Ms. Surfas asked if you sell TDRs does that mean they are gone, and the property never gets them back. Ms. Simon said that is correct. Ms. Surfas wanted clarification that you can hold them as long as you want to which Ms. Simon said yes, and that some people have created them and then changed their minds. It is when you sell them away that is unchangeable. Mr. Fornell asked about a small discrepancy in the packet on the total square footage numbers. Ms. Adams explained the discrepancy as due to a pending project to add a lightwell taking away a few square feet of floor area. Mr. Fornell then asked if Ms. Mullins could come back and ask to create additional TDRs with the remaining undeveloped square footage to which Ms. Simon said yes. He then asked Ms. Mullins why she was only asking for two TDRs at this point. Ms. Mullins said that having been on City Council for eight years she thought it would be a stretch for them to approve four TDRs and that she had seen one and two TDRs being approved but when people request more it usually doesn’t fly. She said that at the moment two TDRs are adequate. She said she is doing some renovations that the sale of these TDRs would help fund but may come back later. Mr. Fornell said he was just concerned that this request would preclude her from be able to ask again in the future as he believed any square footage that you can pull away from a historic asset leaves it more fully intact. He said he was satisfied with the request. Ms. Pitchford asked when you sell TDRs does the receiving site have to be in the City of Aspen limits to which Ms. Simon said yes, it stays within the City. REGULAR MEETING HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION JANUARY 11TH, 2023 PUBLIC COMMENT: None. BOARD DISCUSSION: Ms. Thompson said she had no problem with the request. Mr. Halferty thanked Ms. Mullins and thought the TDR program is a wonderful tool to manage large additions on small historic assets. He said he is in complete support. Ms. Pitchford said she loved the house and how Ms. Mullins has always taken care of it. She had no problem with the creation of the two TDRs. She said she has had increasing negative thoughts about TDRs. Not necessarily the sending but of the receiving of them. Ms. Simon commented that with Ms. Pitchford sitting on the County’s growth management committee, she may be thinking about the County’s TDRs which are much bigger than the City’s. She also mentioned that City Council itself shares the same thoughts and have always liked the sending part, but not the landing part. MOTION: Ms. Thompson motioned to approve the next resolution in the series. Mr. Moyer seconded. Roll call vote: Mr. Fornell, yes; Mr. Moyer, yes; Ms. Surfas, yes; Ms. Pitchford, yes; Mr. Halferty, yes; Ms. Thompson, yes. 6-0, motion passes. There was then some casual discussion about the history of the property and house. Election of Chair and Vice-Chair: Ms. Simon mentioned that this has been done all kinds of ways, including nominations, secret ballots, etc. All members were satisfied with the current Chair and Vice-Chair of Ms. Thompson and Mr. Halferty respectively. MOTION: Mr. Moyer moved that they retain the current officers. Mr. Fornell seconded. Mr. True suggested that someone request that it be accepted by acclimation. Mr. Halferty requested acceptance of acclimation. Roll call vote: Mr. Fornell, yes; Mr. Moyer, yes; Ms. Surfas, yes; Ms. Pitchford, yes; Mr. Halferty, yes; Ms. Thompson, yes. 6-0, motion passes. ADJOURN: Ms. Thompson moved to adjourn the regular meeting. Mr. Moyer seconded. All in favor; motion passes. ____________________ Mike Sear, Deputy City Clerk HPC PROJECT MONITORS - projects in bold are permitted or under construction 1/27/2023 Kara Thompson 931 Gibson 300 E. Hyman 201 E. Main 333 W. Bleeker 234 W. Francis Skier’s Chalet Steakhouse 423 N. Second 135 E. Cooper 101 W. Main (Molly Gibson Lodge) 720 E. Hyman 304 E. Hopkins 930 King 312 W. Hyman 520 E. Cooper Jeff Halferty 533 W. Hallam 110 W. Main, Hotel Aspen 134 E. Bleeker 300 E. Hyman 434 E. Cooper, Bidwell 414-420 E. Cooper, Red Onion/JAS 517 E. Hopkins Lift 1 corridor ski lift support structure 227 E. Bleeker 211 W. Hopkins 211 W. Main 204 S. Galena 215 E. Hallam 500 E. Durant 413 E. Main Roger Moyer 300 W. Main 227 E. Main 110 Neale 517 E. Hopkins Skier’s Chalet Lodge 202 E. Main 305-307 S. Mill, Grey Lady 320 E. Hyman (Wheeler Opera House, solar panels) 611 W. Main 132 W. Hopkins 500 E. Durant Sheri Sanzone 110 W. Main, Hotel Aspen 209 E. Bleeker 820 E. Cooper 125 W. Main Skier’s Chalet Steakhouse Skier’s Chalet Lodge Lift One Park 423 N. Second 121 W. Bleeker HPC PROJECT MONITORS - projects in bold are permitted or under construction 1/27/2023 Jodi Surfas 202 E. Main 305-307 S. Mill, Grey Lady 320 E. Hyman (Wheeler Opera House, solar panels) 611 W. Main 602 E. Hyman Peter Fornell 304 E. Hopkins 930 King 135 W. Francis 233 W. Bleeker Barb Pitchford 121 W. Bleeker 312 W. Hyman 132 W. Hopkins Page 1 of 3 Memorandum TO: Aspen Historic Preservation Commission FROM: Amy Simon, Planning Director MEETING DATE: February 1, 2023 RE: 1020 E. Cooper Avenue – Final Major Development, PUBLIC HEARING APPLICANT /OWNER: 1020 Cooper LLC, c/o OKO Group REPRESENTATIVE: BendonAdams LOCATION: Street Address: 1020 E. Cooper Avenue Legal Description: The East 13.79’ of Lot O and all of Lot P, Block 34, East Aspen Addition to the City of Aspen, County of Pitkin, State of Colorado Parcel Identification Number: PID# 2737-182-32-006 CURRENT ZONING & USE RMF (Residential Multi- Family), Single-family home PROPOSED ZONING & USE: RMF, Multi-family dwelling SUMMARY: On November 10, 2021, HPC granted Conceptual Major Development, Relocation, Demolition, Growth Management, Certificate of Affordable Housing Credits, Transportation and Parking Management approvals for this landmark designated property to be developed with four multi-family units, deed restricted as affordable housing. Two of the units will be located in the historic structure and two are in a detached new structure at the rear of the property. Before proceeding to building permit, Final Major Development approval is needed, focusing on landscape, lighting, fenestration, materials, and the details of any required restoration work. Staff recommends approval of the application, subject to the conditions listed in the proposed resolution. Figure 1: 1020 E. Cooper Site Location 1020 Page 2 of 3 BACKGROUND: 1020 E. Cooper Avenue is a designated 4,379 square foot lot in the Residential Multi-Family (RMF) zone district. The site contains a Victorian era home and two sheds of an unknown construction date. This area of town was not included in the historic Sanborn maps that are typically referenced by HPC in its decision-making, and no historic photos of this house have been located. The only record of the building, other than what can be discovered on-site, is the 1896 Willit’s Map, which shows the footprint (Figure 2). Investigation of the framing of the house has demonstrated that the form of the 19th century home remains intact. The exterior of the house has been altered over time through replacement of materials and windows (Figure 3). REQUEST OF HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION (HPC) The Applicant is seeking the following land use approvals. • Final Major Development (Section 26.415.070.D) to modify the site and the historic resource, and to construct a new detached building along the alley. The Historic Preservation Commission (HPC) is the review authority on this application. The project will proceed to building permit after this review is complete. STAFF COMMENTS: The Historic Preservation Commission (HPC) reviewed numerous iterations of this proposed redevelopment before the first level of approval was granted by this board and upheld by City Council in 2021. Many elements of the project are resolved, including approval to demolish the two non-contributing sheds along the alley, to move the historic resource in its current form onto a new basement, the form and placement of an addition to the historic resource, the form and placement of a new detached building along the alley and the number of parking spaces and location of certain functional elements such as trash storage. There were two conditions of Conceptual approval to be resolved at Final: 1. The restoration approach for the miner’s cottage, including the design of the front porch, will be reviewed in further detail at Final review. 2. The visual impacts of the lightwells adjacent to the resource, including minimizing curb heights and using protective grates rather than railings, requires clarification for Final review. Figure 3: 1020 E. Cooper Avenue, 2019 Figure 2: Willit’s Map, 1896 Page 3 of 3 The restoration approach is still a work in progress in the sense that conditions of approval and inspections during construction will be needed to achieve the best preservation outcome. Staff is satisfied with the representations in the application to minimize the lightwells and install grates to protect the opening. The applicant is committed to undertaking repairs and efforts to re-establish the earlier appearance of the home using the limited photos, maps and physical evidence available to do so. There will be only modest additions made to the resource (a dormer and a porch extension, both attached to an existing 1960s era lean-to at the back of the house.) There are very few miner’s cottages that have been able to be preserved as a one-story free-standing structure like this one will be. The message that this structure is part of the Aspen’s heritage will be significantly reinforced by this project. The detached structure along the alley was found to be a compatible new development on the property at Conceptual review. Exhibit A to this memo indicates the criteria and relevant design guidelines for Final Major Development approval. Staff supports the project with conditions that are aimed to ensure accuracy in the work that directly affects the historic resource. This project is an achievement of community goals through the preservation of a historic resource and development of affordable housing units. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends approval of the proposed resolution. ATTACHMENTS: Resolution #____, Series of 2023 Exhibit A Final Major Development Criteria | Staff Findings Exhibit B – Application HPC Resolution # X, Series of 2023 Page 1 of 3 RESOLUTION # X, SERIES OF 2023 A RESOLUTION OF THE ASPEN HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION (HPC) GRANTING FINAL MAJOR DEVELOPMENT APPROVAL FOR THE PROPERTY LOCATED AT 1020 E. COOPER AVENUE, LEGALLY DESCRIBED AS THE EAST 13.79’ OF LOT O AND ALL OF LOT P, BLOCK 34, EAST ASPEN ADDITION TO THE CITY OF ASPEN, COUNTY OF PITKIN, STATE OF COLORADO. PARCEL ID: 2737-182-32-006 WHEREAS, the applicant, 1020 Cooper LLC, represented by BendonAdams, has requested HPC approval for Final Major Development for the property located at 1020 E. Cooper Avenue; and, WHEREAS, Section 26.415.070 of the Municipal Code states that “no building or structure shall be erected, constructed, enlarged, altered, repaired, relocated or improved involving a designated historic property or district until plans or sufficient information have been submitted to the Community Development Director and approved in accordance with the procedures established for their review;” and, WHEREAS, for Final Major Development Review, the HPC must review the application, a staff analysis report and the evidence presented at a hearing to determine the project’s conformance with the City of Aspen Historic Preservation Design Guidelines per Section 26.415.070.D.4 of the Municipal Code and other applicable Code Sections. The HPC may approve, disapprove, approve with conditions or continue the application to obtain additional information necessary to make a decision to approve or deny; and WHEREAS, Community Development Department staff reviewed the application for compliance with review standards and recommended approval with conditions; and WHEREAS, on February 1, 2023, HPC considered the application, the staff memo and public comment and found the proposal consistent with the review standards, and granted approval with conditions by a vote of X to X (X-X). NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED: That HPC hereby approves Final Major Development for 1020 E. Cooper Avenue, as follows: Section 1: 1. As stated in the Conceptual HPC Resolution #15, Series of 2021, the applicant shall provide financial assurance of $30,000 for the relocation of the historic house until the subgrade construction is complete. The financial security is to be provided with the building permit application along with a relocation plan detailing how the relocation will proceed, and demonstrating the contractor’s qualifications to perform the work. 2. As stated in the Conceptual HPC Resolution #15, Series of 2021, for the purposes of this project, minimal changes of a technical nature related to Floor Area may be approved at building permit. HPC Resolution # X, Series of 2023 Page 2 of 3 3. All conditions of the Conceptual HPC Resolution #15, Series of 2021, Sections 2 and 3, related to Growth Management and Parking, remain in effect. 4. A site visit by staff, and confirmation that the fenestration plan is as accurate as possible for the historic resource is required before submittal of building permit. 5. Cut sheets of the proposed door and windows on the historic resource must be provided for review and approval by staff prior to submittal for building permit. 6. Regarding the porch posts on the front of the historic resource, the applicant is to study other Aspen Victorian structures to model an example of a particularly simple original porch post design, to replicate a size and turning detail that was used here. A shop drawing must be submitted for review and approval by staff prior to submittal for building permit. 7. The roof on the historic resource is to be a fire-rated cut wood cedar shingle of a uniform length and coursing. Any snow retention on the historic building proper must be snow clips rather than bars, to minimize visual impact. Section 2: Material Representations All material representations and commitments made by the Applicant pursuant to the development proposal approvals as herein awarded, whether in public hearing or documentation presented before the Community Development Department, the Historic Preservation Commission, or the Aspen City Council are hereby incorporated in such plan development approvals and the same shall be complied with as if fully set forth herein, unless amended by other specific conditions or an authorized authority. Section 3: Existing Litigation This Resolution shall not affect any existing litigation and shall not operate as an abatement of any action or proceeding now pending under or by virtue of the ordinances repealed or amended as herein provided, and the same shall be conducted and concluded under such prior ordinances. Section 4: Severability If any section, subsection, sentence, clause, phrase, or portion of this Resolution is for any reason held invalid or unconstitutional in a court of competent jurisdiction, such portion shall be deemed a separate, distinct and independent provision and shall not affect the validity of the remaining portions thereof. Section 5: Vested Rights The development approvals granted herein shall constitute a site-specific development plan vested for a period of three (3) years from the date of issuance of a development order. However, any failure to abide by any of the terms and conditions attendant to this approval shall result in the forfeiture of said vested property rights. Unless otherwise exempted or extended, failure to properly record all plats and agreements required to be recorded, as specified herein, within 180 days of the effective date of the development order shall also result in the forfeiture of said vested property rights and shall render the development order void within the meaning of Section 26.104.050 (Void permits). Zoning that is not part of the approved site-specific development plan shall not result in the creation of a vested property right. No later than fourteen (14) days following final approval of all requisite reviews necessary to obtain a development order as set forth in this Ordinance, the City Clerk shall cause to be published in a newspaper of general circulation within the jurisdictional boundaries of the HPC Resolution # X, Series of 2023 Page 3 of 3 City of Aspen, a notice advising the general public of the approval of a site specific development plan and creation of a vested property right pursuant to this Title. Such notice shall be substantially in the following form: Notice is hereby given to the general public of the approval of a site specific development plan, and the creation of a vested property right, valid for a period of three (3) years, pursuant to the Land Use Code of the City of Aspen and Title 24, Article 68, Colorado Revised Statutes, pertaining to the following described property: 1020 E. Cooper Avenue Nothing in this approval shall exempt the development order from subsequent reviews and approvals required by this approval of the general rules, regulations and ordinances or the City of Aspen provided that such reviews and approvals are not inconsistent with this approval. The approval granted hereby shall be subject to all rights of referendum and judicial review; the period of time permitted by law for the exercise of such rights shall not begin to run until the date of publication of the notice of final development approval as required under Section 26.304.070(A). The rights of referendum shall be limited as set forth in the Colorado Constitution and the Aspen Home Rule Charter. APPROVED BY THE COMMISSION at its regular meeting on the 1st day of February, 2023. Approved as to Form: Approved as to Content: ______________________________ ___________________________________ Katharine Johnson, Assistant City Attorney Kara Thompson, Chair ATTEST: ________________________________________________________ Mike Sear, Deputy City Clerk Exhibit A Historic Preservation Design Guidelines Staff Findings Page 1 of 10 26.415.070.D Major Development. No building, structure or landscape shall be erected, constructed, enlarged, altered, repaired, relocated or improved involving a designated historic property or a property located within a Historic District until plans or sufficient information have been submitted to the Community Development Director and approved in accordance with the procedures established for their review. An application for a building permit cannot be submitted without a development order. 4. Final Development Plan Review b. The procedures for the review of final development plans for major development projects are as follows: (1) The Community Development Director shall review the application materials submitted for final development plan approval. If they are determined to be complete, the applicant will be notified in writing of this and a public hearing before the HPC shall be scheduled. Notice of the hearing shall be provided pursuant to Paragraphs 26.304.060.E.3.a, b and c. (2) Staff shall review the submittal material and prepare a report that analyzes the project's conformance with the design guidelines and other applicable Land Use Code sections. This report will be transmitted to the HPC with relevant information on the proposed project and a recommendation to continue, approve, disapprove or approve with conditions and the reasons for the recommendation. The HPC will review the application, the staff analysis report and the evidence presented at the hearing to determine the project's conformance with the City Historic Preservation Design Guidelines. (3) The HPC may approve, disapprove, approve with conditions or continue the application to obtain additional information necessary to make a decision to approve or deny. If the application is approved, the HPC shall issue a certificate of appropriateness and the Community Development Director shall issue a development order. (4) Before an application for a building permit can be submitted, a final set of plans reflecting any or all required changes by the HPC or City Council must be on file with the City. Any conditions of approval or outstanding issues which must be addressed in the field or at a later time shall be noted on the plans. Relevant Historic Preservation Design Guidelines for Final Review of this application (areas where restudy or a condition of approval are needed, in Staff’s opinion, are highlighted): 1.5 Maintain the historic hierarchy of spaces. • Reflect the established progression of public to private spaces from the public sidewalk to a semi-public walkway, to a semi private entry feature, to private spaces. 1.6 Provide a simple walkway running perpendicular from the street to the front entry on residential projects. Exhibit A Historic Preservation Design Guidelines Staff Findings Page 2 of 10 • Meandering walkways are not allowed, except where it is needed to avoid a tree or is typical of the period of significance. • Use paving materials that are similar to those used historically for the building style and install them in the manner that they would have been used historically. For example on an Aspen Victorian landmark set flagstone pavers in sand, rather than in concrete. Light grey concrete, brick or red sandstone are appropriate private walkway materials for most landmarks. • The width of a new entry sidewalk should generally be three feet or less for residential properties. A wider sidewalk may be appropriate for an AspenModern property. 1.7 Provide positive open space within a project site. • Ensure that open space on site is meaningful and consolidated into a few large spaces rather than many small unusable areas. • Open space should be designed to support and complement the historic building. 1.8 Consider stormwater quality needs early in the design process. • When included in the initial planning for a project, stormwater quality facilities can be better integrated into the proposal. All landscape plans presented for HPC review must include at least a preliminary representation of the stormwater design. A more detailed design must be reviewed and approved by Planning and Engineering prior to building permit submittal. • Site designs and stormwater management should provide positive drainage away from the historic landmark, preserve the use of natural drainage and treatment systems of the site, reduce the generation of additional stormwater runoff, and increase infiltration into the ground. Stormwater facilities and conveyances located in front of a landmark should have minimal visual impact when viewed from the public right of way. • Refer to City Engineering for additional guidance and requirements. 1.12 Provide an appropriate context for historic structures. See diagram. • Simplicity and restraint are required. Do not overplant a site, or install a landscape which is overtextured or overly complex in relationship to the historic resource, particularly in Zone A. In Zone A, new planting shall be species that were used historically or species of similar attributes. • In areas immediately adjacent to the landmark, Zone A and Zone B, plants up 42” in height, sod, and low shrubs are often appropriate. • Contemporary planting, walls and other features are not appropriate in Zone A. A more contemporary landscape may surround new development or be located in the rear of the property, in Zone C. • Do not cover areas which were historically unpaved with hard surfaces, except for a limited patio where appropriate. Exhibit A Historic Preservation Design Guidelines Staff Findings Page 3 of 10 • Where residential structures are being adapted to commercial use, proposals to alter the landscape will be considered on a case-by-case basis. The residential nature of the building must be honored. • In the case of a historic landmark lot split, careful consideration should be given so as not to over plant either property, or remove all evidence of the landscape characteristics from before the property was divided. • Contemporary landscapes that highlight an AspenModern architectural style are encouraged. 1.13 Additions of plant material to the landscape that could interfere with or block views of historic structures are inappropriate. • Low plantings and ground covers are preferred. • Do not place trees, shrubs, or hedgerows in locations that will obscure, damage, or block significant architectural features or views to the building. Hedgerows are not allowed as fences. • Consider mature canopy size when planting new trees adjacent to historic resources. Planting trees too close to a landmark may result in building deteriorate or blocked views and is inappropriate. • Climbing vines can damage historic structures and are not allowed. Exhibit A Historic Preservation Design Guidelines Staff Findings Page 4 of 10 1.18 When building an entirely new fence, use materials that are appropriate to the building type and style. • The new fence should use materials that were used on similar properties during the period of significance. • A wood fence is the appropriate solution in most locations. • Ornate fences, including wrought iron, may create a false history are not appropriate for Aspen Victorian landmarks unless there is evidence that a decorative fence historically existed on the site. • A modest wire fence was common locally in the early 1900s and is appropriate for Aspen Victorian properties. This fence type has many desirable characteristics including transparency, a low height, and a simple design. When this material is used, posts should be simply detailed and not oversized. 1.19 A new fence should have a transparent quality, allowing views into the yard from the street. • A fence that defines a front yard must be low in height and transparent in nature. • For a picket fence, spacing between the pickets must be a minimum of 1/2 the width of the picket. • For Post-WWII properties where a more solid type of fence may be historically appropriate, proposals will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. • Fence columns or piers should be proportional to the fence segment. 1.20 Any fence taller than 42” should be designed so that it avoids blocking public views of important features of a designated building. • A privacy fence should incorporate transparent elements to minimize the possible visual impacts. Consider staggering the fence boards on either side of the fence rail. This will give the appearance of a solid plank fence when seen head on. Also consider using lattice, or other transparent detailing on the upper portions of the fence. • A privacy fence should allow the building corners and any important architectural features that are visible from the street to continue to be viewed. • All hedgerows (trees, shrub bushes, etc.) are prohibited in Zones A and B. 2.2 The finish of materials should be as it would have existed historically. • Masonry naturally has a water-protective layer to protect it from the elements. Brick or stone that was not historically painted shall not be painted. • If masonry that was not painted historically was given a coat of paint at some more recent time, consider removing it, using appropriate methods. • Wood should be painted, stained or natural, as appropriate to the style and history of the building. Exhibit A Historic Preservation Design Guidelines Staff Findings Page 5 of 10 2.3 Match the original material in composition, scale and finish when replacing materials on primary surfaces. • If the original material is wood clapboard for example, then the replacement material must be wood as well. It should match the original in size, and the amount of exposed lap and finish. • Replace only the amount required. If a few boards are damaged beyond repair, then only those should be replaced, not the entire wall. For AspenModern buildings, sometimes the replacement of a larger area is required to preserve the integrity of the design intent. 3.3 Match a replacement window to the original in its design. • If the original is double-hung, then the replacement window must also be double-hung. If the sash have divided lights, match that characteristic as well. 3.4 When replacing an original window, use materials that are the same as the original. 3.5 Preserve the size and proportion of a historic window opening. • Changing the window opening is not permitted. • Consider restoring an original window opening that was enclosed in the past. 3.6 Match, as closely as possible, the profile of the sash and its components to that of the original window. • A historic window often has a complex profile. Within the window’s casing, the sash steps back to the plane of the glazing (glass) in several increments. These increments, which individually only measure in eighths or quarters of inches, are important details. They distinguish the actual window from the surrounding plane of the wall. • The historic profile on AspenModern properties is typically minimal. 4.1 Preserve historically significant doors. • Maintain features important to the character of a historic doorway. These include the door, door frame, screen door, threshold, glass panes, paneling, hardware, detailing, transoms and flanking sidelights. • Do not change the position and function of original front doors and primary entrances. • If a secondary entrance must be sealed shut, any work that is done must be reversible so that the door can be used at a later time, if necessary. Also, keep the door in place, in its historic position. • Previously enclosed original doors should be reopened when possible. 4.2 Maintain the original size of a door and its opening. • Altering its size and shape is inappropriate. It should not be widened or raised in height. Exhibit A Historic Preservation Design Guidelines Staff Findings Page 6 of 10 4.4 When replacing a door or screen door, use a design that has an appearance similar to the original door or a door associated with the style of the building. • A replica of the original, if evidence exists, is the preferred replacement. • A historic door or screen door from a similar building also may be considered. • Simple paneled doors were typical for Aspen Victorian properties. • Very ornate doors, including stained or leaded glass, are discouraged, unless photographic evidence can support their use. 5.3 Enclosing a porch or balcony is not appropriate. • Reopening an enclosed porch or balcony is appropriate. 5.4 If reconstruction is necessary, match the original in form, character and detail. • Match original materials. • When reconstructing an original porch or balcony without historic photographs, use dimensions and characteristics found on comparable buildings. Keep style and form simple with minimal, if any, decorative elements. 5.5 If new steps are to be added, construct them out of the same primary materials used on the original, and design them to be in scale with the porch or balcony • Steps should be located in the original location. • Step width should relate to the scale of entry doors, spacing between posts, depth of deck, etc. • Brick, red sandstone, grey concrete, or wood are appropriate materials for steps. 6.4 Repair or replacement of missing or deteriorated features are required to be based on original designs. • The design should be substantiated by physical or pictorial evidence to avoid creating a misrepresentation of the building’s heritage. • When reconstruction of an element is impossible because there is no historical evidence, develop a compatible new design that is a simplified interpretation of the original, and maintains similar scale, proportion and material. 7.4 New vents should be minimized, carefully, placed and painted a dark color. • Direct vents for fireplaces are generally not permitted to be added on historic structures. • Locate vents on non-street facing facades. • Use historic chimneys as chases for new flues when possible. Exhibit A Historic Preservation Design Guidelines Staff Findings Page 7 of 10 7.8 New or replacement roof materials should convey a scale, color and texture similar to the original. • If a substitute is used, such as composition shingle, the roof material should be earth tone and have a matte, non-reflective finish. • Flashing should be in scale with the roof material. • Flashing should be tin, lead coated copper, galvanized or painted metal and have a matte, non-reflective finish. • Design flashing, such as drip edges, so that architectural details are not obscured. • A metal roof is inappropriate for an Aspen Victorian primary home but may be appropriate for a secondary structure from that time period. • A metal roof material should have a matte, non-reflective finish and match the original seaming. 7.10 Design gutters so that their visibility on the structure is minimized to the extent possible. • Downspouts should be placed in locations that are not visible from the street if possible, or in locations that do not obscure architectural detailing on the building. • The material used for the gutters should be in character with the style of the building. 9.5 A new foundation shall appear similar in design and materials to the historic foundation. • On modest structures, a simple foundation is appropriate. Constructing a stone foundation on a miner’s cottage where there is no evidence that one existed historically is out of character and is not allowed. • Exposed concrete or painted metal flashing are generally appropriate. • Where a stone or brick foundation existed historically, it must be replicated, ideally using stone salvaged from the original foundation as a veneer. The replacement must be similar in the cut of the stone and design of the mortar joints. • New AspenModern foundations shall be handled on a case by case basis to ensure preservation of the design intent. 9.6 Minimize the visual impact of lightwells. • The size of any lightwell that faces a street should be minimized. • Lightwells must be placed so that they are not immediately adjacent to character defining features, such as front porches. • Lightwells must be protected with a flat grate, rather than a railing or may not be visible from a street. • Lightwells that face a street must abut the building foundation and generally may not “float” in the landscape except where they are screened, or on an AspenModern site. 10.6 Design a new addition to be recognized as a product of its own time. Exhibit A Historic Preservation Design Guidelines Staff Findings Page 8 of 10 • An addition shall be distinguishable from the historic building and still be visually compatible with historic features. • A change in setbacks of the addition from the historic building, a subtle change in material, or a modern interpretation of a historic style are all techniques that may be considered to help define a change from historic construction to new construction. • Do not reference historic styles that have no basis in Aspen. • Consider these three aspects of an addition; form, materials, and fenestration. An addition must relate strongly to the historic resource in at least two of these elements. Departing from the historic resource in one of these categories allows for creativity and a contemporary design response. • Note that on a corner lot, departing from the form of the historic resource may not be allowed. • There is a spectrum of appropriate solutions to distinguishing new from old portions of a development. Some resources of particularly high significance or integrity may not be the right instance for a contrasting addition. 11.6 Design a new structure to be recognized as a product of its time. • Consider these three aspects of a new building; form, materials, and fenestration. A project must relate strongly to the historic resource in at least two of these elements. Departing from the historic resource in one of these categories allows for creativity and a contemporary design response. • When choosing to relate to building form, use forms that are similar to the historic resource. • When choosing to relate to materials, use materials that appear similar in scale and finish to those used historically on the site and use building materials that contribute to a traditional sense of human scale • When choosing to relate to fenestration, use windows and doors that are similar in size and shape to those of the historic resource. 11.7 The imitation of older historic styles is discouraged. • This blurs the distinction between old and new buildings.Overall, details shall be modest in character. 12.3 Exterior light fixtures should be simple in character. • The design of a new fixture should be appropriate in form, finish, and scale with the structure. • New fixtures should not reflect a different period of history than that of the affected building, or be associated with a different architectural style. • Lighting should be placed in a manner that is consistent with the period of the building, and should not provide a level of illumination that is out of character. Exhibit A Historic Preservation Design Guidelines Staff Findings Page 9 of 10 • One light adjacent to each entry is appropriate on an Aspen Victorian residential structure. A recessed fixture, surface mounted light, pendant or sconce will be considered if suited to the building type or style. • On commercial structures and AspenModern properties, recessed lights and concealed lights are often most appropriate. 12.4 Minimize the visual impacts of utilitarian areas, such as mechanical equipment and trash storage. • Place mechanical equipment on the ground where it can be screened. • Mechanical equipment may only be mounted on a building on an alley façade. • Rooftop mechanical equipment or vents must be grouped together to minimize their visual impact. Where rooftop units are visible, it may be appropriate to provide screening with materials that are compatible with those of the building itself. Use the smallest, low profile units available for the purpose. • Window air conditioning units are not allowed. • Minimize the visual impacts of utility connections and service boxes. Group them in a discrete location. Use pedestals when possible, rather than mounting on a historic building. • Paint mechanical equipment in a neutral color to minimize their appearance by blending with their backgrounds • In general, mechanical equipment should be vented through the roof, rather than a wall, in a manner that has the least visual impact possible. • Avoid surface mounted conduit on historic structures. Staff Findings: Guidelines applicable to this level of review address Site Planning and Landscape Design, Building Materials, Windows, Doors, Porches, Architectural Details, Roofs, Foundations, Additions, New Buildings on Landmarked Properties, and Lighting, Mechanical and Service Areas. The proposal for Final review is entirely consistent with the approved Conceptual design. This review is focused on landscape, lighting, fenestration, materials, and the details of any required restoration work. Staff has only cited the guidelines pertinent to this process step in our analysis. In general staff finds the application to be compliant with the design guidelines. This structure has been altered, and evidence to guide restoration efforts is very limited. The scale and form of the building will be preserved and the exterior will reflect a best effort to represent the building as it might have appeared historically. To ensure compliance with guidelines 3.5, 4.1, and 4.2, staff recommends an additional site visit occur with staff and architect to examine the building. This occurred early in the land use review process, however a repeat is appropriate to ensure that the renovation places and sizes door and window openings as accurately as possible. A condition is included in the proposed Exhibit A Historic Preservation Design Guidelines Staff Findings Page 10 of 10 resolution requiring a site visit by staff and confirmation of the fenestration plan is required before submittal of building permit. In this same vein, to meet the goals of guidelines 3.6, 4.4, cut sheets of the proposed wood windows and door to be added in the historic portion of the Victorian must be submitted for review and approval by staff prior to permit submittal. This is a condition in the attached resolution. Regarding guideline 5.4, addressing porch restoration, the application proposes the use of turned porch posts, which is appropriate, however given the complete lack of evidence of the original appearance, staff recommends a study of other Aspen Victorian structures to model an example of a particularly simple original porch post design, to replicate a size and turning detail that was used here. A shop drawing must be submitted for review and approval by staff prior to submittal for building permit. Finally, staff recommends a different specification for the roof on the historic resource. A fire- rated wood shingle roof on the historic resource is an appropriate way to reinforce historic character. The wood shingles, however must be a cut wood cedar shingle of a uniform length and coursing, not the material proposed in the application, a live oak which appears to be rough sawn and varied in size. The wood roofing is to be revised as a condition of approval. The application shows wood snow fence on the non-historic portion of the existing resource, which is acceptable, however any snow retention on the historic building proper must be snow clips, the typical approved design to minimize visual impact. Staff finds that this project will contribute positively to Aspen’s historic preservation program, and meets expressed community goals in many ways. After many versions of redevelopment for this site, including a single family home proposal made in 2019, this is a successful outcome that retains a modest historic resource and re-activates a property that has been vacant for some time. Staff recommends approval of the attached resolution. 300 SO SPRING ST | 202 | ASPEN, CO 81611 970.925.2855 | BENDONADAMS.COM Aspen Historic Preservation Commission c/o Amy Simon October 31, 2022 Re: 1020 East Cooper Avenue – Final Review Dear Historic Preservation Commission, Please accept this application for final design review at 1020 East Cooper Avenue. The Historic Preservation Commission (HPC) granted conceptual, relocation, demolition, growth management, housing credits, and transportation approvals for a 100% affordable housing project in November 2021 via HPC Resolution 15-2021. The property is located within the City of Aspen’s Residential Multi-Family Zone District (RMF), surrounded by multi-family buildings, and is approximately 4,379 sf in size. The designated historic structure was formerly the home of columnist and longtime local Su Lum. 1020 East Cooper has been heavily altered over time - upon physical inspection it appears that two, simple 19th century miner’s cabins were stitched together in an “L” footprint in the 1890s. Historic framing, gable roof form, and historic siding are evident inside the building. There are no clear historic photographs showing the property and historic maps do not include this neighborhood with the exception of the 1896 Willits Town Map (figure 1). Historic newspapers and directories list a number of families residing in the home over the years as far back as 1889, which shows that 1020 East Cooper was a typical miner’s cabin residence as found throughout Aspen. The 1020 Project restores window openings, clapboard siding, and a typical open front porch. Historic structures are found throughout the neighborhood - the restoration of the cabin contributes to the character and pedestrian friendly experience along Cooper. Historic Preservation Design Guidelines are addressed in Exhibit 1. HPC granted approval to relocate the landmark Figure 1: 1896 Willits map Page 2 of 5 1020 East Cooper Project October 2022 Final Review toward Cooper Avenue with a 6.5 foot front setback and to demolish the non-historic and encroaching sheds along the alley. Conversion of this property to an affordable housing project aligns with City Council and community wide goals to provide deed restricted housing within city limits and to preserve Aspen’s historic fabric for future generations to experience. As stated in the vision statement of the 2012 Aspen Area Community Plan “we believe that a strong and diverse year-round community and a viable and healthy local workforce are fundamental cornerstones for the sustainability of the Aspen Area community.” We received conceptual approval for a four-unit project that fits into the existing multi-family neighborhood context, meets zoning requirements, and is walking distance to downtown. Conditions of Approval for Final Review HPC Resolution 15-2021 granted conceptual approval with conditions of approval to be addressed at final design review. Section 1: Conceptual Development, Relocation and Demolition. HPC hereby approves Conceptual Major Development, Relocation and Demolition as proposed subject to the following conditions: 1. The restoration approach for the miner’s cottage, including the design of the front porch, will be reviewed in further detail at Final review. Please reference Sheets A2.01, A2.02, A2.05, and HP 1 for restoration details. 2. The visual impacts of the lightwells adjacent to the resource, including minimizing curb heights and using protective grates rather than railings, requires clarification for Final review. Egress grates are proposed for all lightwells as shown on Sheet A1.02. 3. Continue to work with Referral Agencies to advance the project into Final design and permit review. The project team has continued to coordinate with referral agencies as the final design package was assembled. 4. Provide financial assurance of $30,000 for the relocation of the historic house until the subgrade construction is complete. The financial security is to be provided with the building permit application. Provide a relocation plan detailing how the relocation will proceed and demonstrating the contractor’s qualifications to perform the work. The property owner will provide a letter of credit, or other acceptable financial assurance as determined by the City Attorney, with the building permit application to ensure the safe relocation of the historic home. 5. A development application for Final Development Plan shall be submitted within 1 year of the date of approval of a Conceptual Development Plan. Failure to file such an application within this time period shall render null and void the approval of the Conceptual Development Plan. The Historic Preservation Commission may, at its sole discretion and for good cause shown, grant a one-time extension of the expiration date Page 3 of 5 1020 East Cooper Project October 2022 Final Review for a Conceptual Development Plan approval for up to 6 months provided a written request for extension is received no less than 30 days prior to the expiration date. Conceptual approvals were granted on November 10, 2021. The final design application is hereby submitted on October 31, 2022. 6. For the purposes of this project, minimal changes of a technical nature related to Floor Area may be approved at building permit. Noted. Project Summary Materials, architectural details, site plan, and fenestration are consistent with the representations made during conceptual design review. A simple site plan with permeable pavers, grass, lilac bushes, and small planting beds is proposed. Walkways are perpendicular to entrances. Landmark The material palette for the landmark is consistent with similar modest miner’s cabins: horizontal painted lap siding, wood shingle roof, and light grey pavers. The foundation base is painted sheet metal. The rear dormer and non-historic side porch are proposed to have standing seam metal roof. Galvanized half round gutters and snow fences are proposed as represented on Sheet A1.10. The landmark is proposed to have painted wood double hung windows. A simple black gooseneck sconce is proposed to be located next to each entry door in the landmark. Half light doors are proposed for the landmark. New Detached Building The new building material palette is found on Sheet A2.03 and comprises horizontal lap siding wood siding, vertical 6” reclaimed wood siding, and a galvanized metal siding at the base. The shutters are 4” reclaimed wood and roof materials are dark grey asphalt shingles and standing seam metal dormers. Snow fences, gutters, and downspouts are proposed on Sheet A1.10.The material application breaks up the building in modules by subtle changes in direction. The proposed exterior sconce is the same as proposed for the landmark. Full light doors are proposed. Table 1: Approved Dimensions RMF Zone District Dimensional Requirement November 10, 2021 Lot Size No lot size minimum for historic properties No change to lot size Floor Area 1:25:1 and 5,474sf 0.78:1 and 3,413.89 sf Density Allowances No limit 4 units Max. height 32 ft South: 20 ft 6 in North: 20 ft 8.5 in East: 23 ft 8.5 in West:23 ft 4 in Front Setback 5 ft 6 ft 6 in Page 4 of 5 1020 East Cooper Project October 2022 Final Review Affordable Housing The 1020 Project is a voluntary 100% affordable housing project that requests affordable housing credits in exchange for creating voluntary deed restricting units. A breakdown of the unit sizes and locations is provided in Table 2. A total of 12.75 full time equivalents (FTEs) are generated by the 1020 Project. The units are proposed to be rentals that are sold to Pitkin County employers to rent to APCHA qualified employees. According to the Land Use Code and APCHA Standards, category designation will be finalized at the time of deed restriction by the owner but will be at Category 4 or less. Table 2: Affordable Housing Unit Breakdown Unit Beds Basement Net Livable Area (sf) Ground Level Net Livable Area (sf) Second Level Net Livable Area (sf) Total Size (sf) Excluding exterior storage Total Size (sf) Including exterior storage Private Deck Stacked Unit landmark 101 2 462.52 450.47 104.27* 912.99 1,017.26 y y landmark 102 3 482.85 477.60 182.9 1,143.34 1,171.29 y y 103 4 653.2 657.61 x 1,310.81 1,344.83 y y 201 3 X x 990.91 990.91 1,011.91 y n TOTAL Net Livable Area (sf) 4,358.05 4,545.29 *Unit 101 has a storage loft accessed interior to the unit. Parking HPC approved two onsite parking spaces, and cash in lieu for the remaining 2 spaces. Carshare memberships will be offered to each unit for their first year to discourage car ownership, in addition to Wecycle memberships, and onsite bike racks. A welcome packet with alternative forms of transportation, bike and walking trail maps, and bus schedules will be provided to tenants. All of these measures discourage car ownership and encourage Aspen’s robust alternative transportation options. The 1020 Project is conveniently located a few blocks from downtown, bus stops, and trails. Side Setbacks 5 ft 5 ft Rear Setback 5 ft 5 ft Parking 0 onsite spaces required. Mitigation for 4 spaces required. 2 onsite spaces provided, cash in lieu payment for 2 spaces Min Trash and Recycle Area size 120 sf 124.72 sf Page 5 of 5 1020 East Cooper Project October 2022 Final Review Residential Design Standards Residential Design Standards (RDS) are required for multi-family residential projects that are not listed on the historic inventory. The new building is subject to RDS and meets all requirements demonstrated during conceptual review. Tree The large spruce tree located within the property boundaries between the rear of the house and the non-historic sheds has been previously approved for removal by the Parks Department. The spruce tree that straddles the east property line is not proposed for removal and mitigation unless consent is received from the Riverside Condominiums because it sits on the shared property line with roots extending to both properties. A 10’ radius drip line was determined by the City Forester on July 14, 2020 and is accommodated in the application. Thank you for the opportunity to present this important project that balances many community goals including affordable housing and historic preservation. Together, as a community, we can address the lack of housing with thoughtful projects throughout town. As stated in the 2012 Aspen Area Community Plan “the creation of affordable housing is the responsibility of our entire community, not just government.” Preserving a historic resource as part of an affordable housing plan is a welcome challenge that results in an authentic project with genuine character, adaptive reuse of a historic asset, and lights on vitality. Sincerely, Sara Adams, AICP BendonAdams LLC Exhibits 1 – Historic Preservation Review - Final HP Design Review 2 – Transportation Impact Analysis 3 – Pre-application summary 4 - Land Use Application 5 – Proof of Ownership 6 – Authorization to Represent 7 - Agreement to Pay 8 - HOA form 9- Vicinity Map 10 – Mailing List 11 – HPC Resolution 15-2021 12- Civil Drawings and Drainage letter 13 – Relocation letter submitted with conceptual application 14 – Neighborhood context 15 - Survey 16 - Proposed drawing set and renderings Exhibit 1 HP Final Reviews October 2022 1020 East Cooper Project Exhibit 1 Historic Preservation Reviews 26.415.070. Development involving designated historic property or property within a historic district. No building, structure or landscape shall be erected, constructed, enlarged, altered, repaired, relocated or improved involving a designated historic property or a property located within a Historic District until plans or sufficient information have been submitted to the Community Development Director and approved in accordance with the procedures established for their review. An application for a building permit cannot be submitted without a development order. b. The procedures for the review of final development plans for major development projects are as follows: 1. The Community Development Director shall review the application materials submitted for final development plan approval. If they are determined to be complete, the applicant will be notified in writing of this and a public hearing before the HPC shall be scheduled. Notice of the hearing shall be provided pursuant to Paragraphs 26.304.060(e)(3)a, b and c. 2. Staff shall review the submittal material and prepare a report that analyzes the project's conformance with the design guidelines and other applicable Land Use Code sections. This report will be transmitted to the HPC with relevant information on the proposed project and a recommendation to continue, approve, disapprove or approve with conditions and the reasons for the recommendation. The HPC will review the application, the staff analysis report and the evidence presented at the hearing to determine the project's conformance with the City Historic Preservation Design Guidelines. 3. The HPC may approve, disapprove, approve with conditions or continue the application to obtain additional information necessary to make a decision to approve or deny. If the application is approved, the HPC shall issue a certificate of appropriateness and the Community Development Director shall issue a development order. 4. Before an application for a building permit can be submitted, a final set of plans reflecting any or all required changes by the HPC or City Council must be on file with the City. Any conditions of approval or outstanding issues which must be addressed in the field or at a later time shall be noted on the plans. Response: Applicable Design Guidelines are addressed below: Exhibit 1 HP Final Reviews October 2022 1020 East Cooper Project Streetscape 1.1 All projects shall respect the historic development pattern or context of the block, neighborhood or district. • Building footprint and location should reinforce the traditional patterns of the neighborhood. • Allow for some porosity on a site. In a residential project, setback to setback development is typically uncharacteristic of the historic context. Do not design a project which leaves no useful open space visible from the street. Response – The proposed project reinforces the traditional street grid with both buildings perpendicular to Cooper Street. Open space is provided between the two buildings and surrounding both buildings. Visible open space surrounds the historic building, and an existing spruce tree will be visible directly behind the landmark. 1.2 Preserve the system and character of historic streets, alleys, and ditches. When HPC input is requested, the following bullet points may be applicable. • Retain and preserve the variety and character found in historic alleys, including retaining historic ancillary buildings or constructing new ones. • Retain and preserve the simple character of historic ditches. Do not plant flowers or add landscape. • Abandoning or re-routing a street in a historic area is generally discouraged. • Consider the value of unpaved alleys in residential areas. • Opening a platted right of way which was abandoned or never graded may be encouraged on a case by case basis. Response – No changes are proposed in the right of way unless required by Engineering and Parks Departments. Sidewalk, curb and gutter replacements are proposed in the civil drawing set. Street trees are under consideration by the Parks Department. Two non-historic sheds sit in the alley and are approved to be demolished. 1.3 Remove driveways or parking areas accessed directly from the street if they were not part of the original development of the site. • Do not introduce new curb cuts on streets. • Non-historic driveways accessed from the street should be removed if they can be relocated to the alley. Response – n/a. 1.4 Design a new driveway or improve an existing driveway in a manner that minimizes its visual impact. • If an alley exists at the site, the new driveway must be located off it. • Tracks, gravel, light grey concrete with minimal seams, or similar materials are appropriate for driveways on Aspen Victorian properties. Exhibit 1 HP Final Reviews October 2022 1020 East Cooper Project Response – All vehicular access is proposed off the alley. 1.5 Maintain the historic hierarchy of spaces. • Reflect the established progression of public to private spaces from the public sidewalk to a semi- public walkway, to a semi private entry feature, to private spaces. Response – A simple straight walkway is proposed from the sidewalk to the front porch of the historic building. A low wood picket fence is proposed across the front of the property. Access to the rear building is from the alley. 1.6 Provide a simple walkway running perpendicular from the street to the front entry on residential projects. • Meandering walkways are not allowed, except where it is needed to avoid a tree or is typical of the period of significance. • Use paving materials that are similar to those used historically for the building style and install them in the manner that they would have been used historically. For example on an Aspen Victorian landmark set flagstone pavers in sand, rather than in concrete. Light grey concrete, brick or red sandstone are appropriate private walkway materials for most landmarks. • The width of a new entry sidewalk should generally be three feet or less for residential properties. A wider sidewalk may be appropriate for an AspenModern property. Response – A simple 3-foot wide walkway perpendicular from the street to the front porch is proposed off the sidewalk. A 2.5-foot side walkway to the rear housing unit in the landmark is proposed at the west corner of the property. 1.7 Provide positive open space within a project site. • Ensure that open space on site is meaningful and consolidated into a few large spaces rather than many small unusable areas. • Open space should be designed to support and complement the historic building. Response – Open space is preserved around the historic building in compliance with the required setbacks in the RMF zone district. The front yard has been increased by a foot. Communal open space is provided between the buildings and beneath the preserved spruce tree in the east yard. Decks are proposed to support and completement the historic building by reducing mass through building setbacks. A side porch is proposed on the landmark to relate to the front porch. Side porches are typical building characteristics found on 19th century miner’s cabins. 1.8 Consider stormwater quality needs early in the design process. • When included in the initial planning for a project, stormwater quality facilities can be better integrated into the proposal. All landscape plans presented for HPC review must include at least a preliminary representation of the stormwater design. A more detailed design must be reviewed and approved by Planning and Engineering prior to building permit submittal. • Site designs and stormwater management should provide positive drainage away from the historic landmark, preserve the use of natural drainage and treatment systems of the site, reduce the generation of additional stormwater runoff, and increase infiltration into the ground. Exhibit 1 HP Final Reviews October 2022 1020 East Cooper Project Stormwater facilities and conveyances located in front of a landmark should have minimal visual impact when viewed from the public right of way. • Refer to City Engineering for additional guidance and requirements. Response – Storm water design has been further developed in consultation with the Engineering Department and is included as Exhibit 12. 1.9 Landscape development on AspenModern landmarks shall be addressed on a case by case basis. Response – n/a. 1.10 Built-in furnishings, such as water features, fire pits, grills, and hot tubs, that could interfere with or block views of historic structures are inappropriate. • Site furnishings that are added to the historic property should not be intrusive or degrade the integrity of the neighborhood patterns, site, or existing historic landscape. • Consolidating and screening these elements is preferred. Response – A grill is proposed between the two buildings. This location does not impact the historic building. 1.11 Preserve and maintain historically significant landscaping on site, particularly landmark trees and shrubs. • Retaining historic planting beds and landscape features is encouraged. • Protect historically significant vegetation during construction to avoid damage. Removal of damaged, aged, or diseased trees must be approved by the Parks Department. • If a significant tree must be removed, replace it with the same or similar species in coordination with the Parks Department. • The removal of non-historic planting schemes is encouraged. • Consider restoring the original landscape if information is available, including original plant materials. Response – The spruce tree in the east side yard is proposed to remain based on neighbor comments. 1.12 Provide an appropriate context for historic structures. See diagram. Response – Simple landscaping is proposed around the historic structure with planting beds and sod in the front and side yards. Lilac bushes are proposed along the east property line. A patio is located behind the landmark, between the two buildings. 1.13 Additions of plant material to the landscape that could interfere with or block views of historic structures are inappropriate. • Low plantings and ground covers are preferred. • Do not place trees, shrubs, or hedgerows in locations that will obscure, damage, or block significant architectural features or views to the building. Hedgerows are not allowed as fences. Exhibit 1 HP Final Reviews October 2022 1020 East Cooper Project • Consider mature canopy size when planting new trees adjacent to historic resources. Planting trees too close to a landmark may result in building deteriorate or blocked views and is inappropriate. • Climbing vines can damage historic structures and are not allowed. Response – Sod and low plants are proposed around the landmark to not obscure historic characteristics and to avoid accelerating deterioration of historic material. All sprinkler heads will be directed away from the siding. 1.14 Minimize the visual impacts of landscape lighting. • Landscape and pathway lighting is not permitted in Zone A (refer to diagram) on Aspen Victorian properties unless an exception is approved by HPC based on safety considerations. • Landscape, driveway, and pathway lighting on AspenModern properties is addressed on a case- by-case basis. • Landscape light fixtures should be carefully selected so that they are compatible with the building, yet recognizable as a product of their own time. • Driveway lighting is not permitted on Aspen Victorian properties. • Landscape uplighting is not allowed. Response – Landscape lighting is not proposed at this time. 1.15 Preserve original fences. • Fences which are considered part of the historic significance of a site should not be moved, removed, or inappropriately altered. • Replace only those portions of a historic fence that are deteriorated beyond repair. • Replacement elements must match the existing. Response – The existing fence is not original and is proposed to be removed and replaced with a wooden picket fence along the front of the property. 1.16 When possible, replicate a missing historic fence based on photographic evidence. Response – n/a. 1.17 No fence in the front yard is often the most appropriate solution. • Reserve fences for back yards and behind street facing façades, as the best way to preserve the character of a property. Response – A low picket fence is proposed in the front yard to define the property and frame the historic building. 1.18 When building an entirely new fence, use materials that are appropriate to the building type and style. • The new fence should use materials that were used on similar properties during the period of significance. Exhibit 1 HP Final Reviews October 2022 1020 East Cooper Project • A wood fence is the appropriate solution in most locations. • Ornate fences, including wrought iron, may create a false history are not appropriate for Aspen Victorian landmarks unless there is evidence that a decorative fence historically existed on the site. • A modest wire fence was common locally in the early 1900s and is appropriate for Aspen Victorian properties. This fence type has many desirable characteristics including transparency, a low height, and a simple design. When this material is used, posts should be simply detailed and not oversized. Response – Side yard fencing is not proposed at this time. 1.19 A new fence should have a transparent quality, allowing views into the yard from the street. • A fence that defines a front yard must be low in height and transparent in nature. • For a picket fence, spacing between the pickets must be a minimum of 1/2 the width of the picket. • For Post-WWII properties where a more solid type of fence may be historically appropriate, proposals will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. • Fence columns or piers should be proportional to the fence segment. Response – The low picket fence along the front of the property meets these requirements and is transparent as defined above. 1.20 Any fence taller than 42” should be designed so that it avoids blocking public views of important features of a designated building. • A privacy fence should incorporate transparent elements to minimize the possible visual impacts. Consider staggering the fence boards on either side of the fence rail. This will give the appearance of a solid plank fence when seen head on. Also consider using lattice, or other transparent detailing on the upper portions of the fence. • A privacy fence should allow the building corners and any important architectural features that are visible from the street to continue to be viewed. • All hedgerows (trees, shrub bushes, etc.) are prohibited in Zones A and B. Response – The fence along the front of the property is 2.5-feet in height. Please reference Sheet A2.05 for a detail of the fence and spacing between pickets. 1.21 Preserve original retaining walls • Replace only those portions that are deteriorated beyond repair. Any replacement materials should match the original in color, texture, size and finish. • Painting or covering a historic masonry retaining wall or covering is not allowed. • Increasing the height of a retaining wall is inappropriate. Response – n/a. 1.22 When a new retaining wall is necessary, its height and visibility should be minimized. • All wall materials, including veneer and mortar, will be reviewed on a case by case basis and should be compatible with the palette used on the historic structure. Exhibit 1 HP Final Reviews October 2022 1020 East Cooper Project Response – n/a. 1.23 Re-grading the site in a manner that changes historic grade is generally not allowed and will be reviewed on a case by case basis. Response – Minor grading of the site is proposed to ensure proper drainage away from the buildings. Significant regrading is not proposed. 1.24 Preserve historically significant landscapes with few or no alterations. • An analysis of the historic landscape and an assessment of the current condition of the landscape should be done before the beginning of any project. • The key features of the historic landscape and its overall design intent must be preserved. Response – n/a. This property does not have a recognized historically significant landscape. 1.25 New development on these sites should respect the historic design of the landscape and its built features. • Do not add features that damage the integrity of the historic landscape. • Maintain the existing pattern of setbacks and siting of structures. • Maintain the historic relationship of the built landscape to natural features on the site. • All additions to these landscapes must be clearly identifiable as recent work. • New artwork must be subordinate to the designed landscape in terms of placement, height, material, and overall appearance. Place new art away from significant landscape features. • Avoid installing utility trenches in cultural landscapes if possible. Response – n/a. This property does not have a recognized historically significant landscape. 1.26 Preserve the historic circulation system. • Minimize the impact of new vehicular circulation. • Minimize the visual impact of new parking. • Maintain the separation of pedestrian and vehicle which occurred historically. Response – Parking is located off the alley. 1.27 Preserve and maintain significant landscaping on site. • Protect established vegetation during any construction. • If any tree or shrub needs to be removed, replace it with the same or similar species. • New planting should be of a species used historically or a similar species. • Maintain and preserve any gardens and/or ornamental planting on the site. • Maintain and preserve any historic landscape elements. Response – The preserved spruce tree in the east yard will be protected during construction in accordance with the City of Aspen Parks Department regulations. Exhibit 1 HP Final Reviews October 2022 1020 East Cooper Project Restoration Materials 2.1 Preserve original building materials. • Do not remove siding that is in good condition or that can be repaired in place. • Masonry features that define the overall historic character, such as walls, cornices, pediments, steps and foundations, should be preserved. • Avoid rebuilding a major portion of an exterior wall that could be repaired in place. Reconstruction may result in a building which no longer retains its historic integrity. • Original AspenModern materials may be replaced in kind if it has been determined that the weathering detracts from the original design intent or philosophy. 2.2 The finish of materials should be as it would have existed historically. • Masonry naturally has a water-protective layer to protect it from the elements. Brick or stone that was not historically painted shall not be painted. • If masonry that was not painted historically was given a coat of paint at some more recent time, consider removing it, using appropriate methods. • Wood should be painted, stained or natural, as appropriate to the style and history of the building. 2.3 Match the original material in composition, scale and finish when replacing materials on primary surfaces. • If the original material is wood clapboard for example, then the replacement material must be wood as well. It should match the original in size, and the amount of exposed lap and finish. • Replace only the amount required. If a few boards are damaged beyond repair, then only those should be replaced, not the entire wall. For AspenModern buildings, sometimes the replacement of a larger area is required to preserve the integrity of the design intent. 2.4 Do not use synthetic materials as replacements for original building materials. • Original building materials such as wood siding and brick should not be replaced with synthetic materials. 2.5 Covering original building materials with new materials is inappropriate. • Regardless of their character, new materials obscure the original, historically significant material. • Any material that covers historic materials may also trap moisture between the two layers. This will cause accelerated deterioration to the historic material which may go unnoticed. 2.6 Remove layers that cover the original material. • Once the non-historic siding is removed, repair the original, underlying material. Exhibit 1 HP Final Reviews October 2022 1020 East Cooper Project Response – Existing conditions beneath the vinyl siding do not show historic siding. Historic siding is found in the interior of the building where the two historic buildings were stitched together. This siding was used to dimension new siding for the exterior of the historic building – 4” lap siding. Windows 3.1 Preserve the functional and decorative features of a historic window. • Features important to the character of a window include its frame, sash, muntins/mullions, sills, heads, jambs, moldings, operations, and groupings of windows. • Repair frames and sashes rather than replacing them. • Preserve the original glass. If original Victorian era glass is broken, consider using restoration glass for the repair. 3.2 Preserve the position, number, and arrangement of historic windows in a building wall. • Enclosing a historic window is inappropriate. • Do not change the size of an original window opening. 3.3 Match a replacement window to the original in its design. • If the original is double-hung, then the replacement window must also be double-hung. If the sash have divided lights, match that characteristic as well. 3.4 When replacing an original window, use materials that are the same as the original. 3.5 Preserve the size and proportion of a historic window opening. • Changing the window opening is not permitted. • Consider restoring an original window opening that was enclosed in the past. 3.6 Match, as closely as possible, the profile of the sash and its components to that of the original window. • A historic window often has a complex profile. Within the window’s casing, the sash steps back to the plane of the glazing (glass) in several increments. These increments, which individually only measure in eighths or quarters of inches, are important details. They distinguish the actual window from the surrounding plane of the wall. • The historic profile on AspenModern properties is typically minimal. 3.7 Adding new openings on a historic structure is generally not allowed. • Greater flexibility in installing new windows may be considered on rear or secondary walls. • New windows should be similar in scale to the historic openings on the building, but should in some way be distinguishable as new, through the use of somewhat different detailing, etc. • Preserve the historic ratio of window openings to solid wall on a façade. Exhibit 1 HP Final Reviews October 2022 1020 East Cooper Project • Significantly increasing the amount of glass on a character defining façade will negatively affect the integrity of a structure. 3.8 Use a storm window to enhance energy conservation rather than replace a historic window. • Install a storm window on the interior, when feasible. This will allow the character of the original window to be seen from the public way. • If a storm window is to be installed on the exterior, match the sash design and material of the original window. It should fit tightly within the window opening without the need for sub-frames or panning around the perimeter. A storm window should not include muntins unless necessary for structure. Any muntin should be placed to match horizontal or vertical divisions of the historic window. Response – No original or historic windows exist. Traditional wooden double hung windows are proposed in the historic building. Framing within the historic building does not clearly demonstrate original openings, but provides some insight that informs the proposed window locations. Figure 1: Framing inside 1020 East Cooper shows a pieced together hodgepodge of openings that have been closed and a lot of salvaged material which compromises the ability to identify accurate historic window locations. Exhibit 1 HP Final Reviews October 2022 1020 East Cooper Project Doors 4.1 Preserve historically significant doors. • Maintain features important to the character of a historic doorway. These include the door, door frame, screen door, threshold, glass panes, paneling, hardware, detailing, transoms and flanking sidelights. • Do not change the position and function of original front doors and primary entrances. • If a secondary entrance must be sealed shut, any work that is done must be reversible so that the door can be used at a later time, if necessary. Also, keep the door in place, in its historic position. • Previously enclosed original doors should be reopened when possible. 4.2 Maintain the original size of a door and its opening. • Altering its size and shape is inappropriate. It should not be widened or raised in height. 4.3 When a historic door or screen door is damaged, repair it and maintain its general historic appearance. 4.4 When replacing a door or screen door, use a design that has an appearance similar to the original door or a door associated with the style of the building. • A replica of the original, if evidence exists, is the preferred replacement. • A historic door or screen door from a similar building also may be considered. • Simple paneled doors were typical for Aspen Victorian properties. • Very ornate doors, including stained or leaded glass, are discouraged, unless photographic evidence can support their use. 4.5 Adding new doors on a historic building is generally not allowed. • Place new doors in any proposed addition rather than altering the historic resource. • Greater flexibility in installing a door in a new location may be considered on rear or secondary walls. • A new door in a new location should be similar in scale and style to historic openings on the building and should be a product of its own time. • Preserve the historic ratio of openings to solid wall on a façade. Significantly increasing the openings on a character defining façade negatively affects the integrity of a structure. 4.6 If energy conservation and heat loss are concerns, use a storm door instead of replacing a historic entry door. • Match the material, frame design, character, and color of the primary door. • Simple features that do not detract from the historic entry door are appropriate for a new storm door. • New screen doors should be in character with the primary door. Exhibit 1 HP Final Reviews October 2022 1020 East Cooper Project 4.7 Preserve historic hardware. • When new hardware is needed, it must be in scale with the door and appropriate to the style of the building. • On Aspen Victorian properties, conceal any modern elements such as entry key pads. Response – There are no historic doors on this property. A simple half light front door is proposed facing Cooper Avenue. Porch 5.1 Preserve an original porch or balcony. • Replace missing posts and railings when necessary. Match the original proportions, material and spacing of balusters. • Expanding the size of a historic porch or balcony is inappropriate. 5.2 Avoid removing or covering historic materials and details. • Removing an original balustrade, for example, is inappropriate. 5.3 Enclosing a porch or balcony is not appropriate. • Reopening an enclosed porch or balcony is appropriate. 5.4 If reconstruction is necessary, match the original in form, character and detail. • Match original materials. • When reconstructing an original porch or balcony without historic photographs, use dimensions and characteristics found on comparable buildings. Keep style and form simple with minimal, if any, decorative elements. 5.5 If new steps are to be added, construct them out of the same primary materials used on the original, and design them to be in scale with the porch or balcony • Steps should be located in the original location. • Step width should relate to the scale of entry doors, spacing between posts, depth of deck, etc. • Brick, red sandstone, grey concrete, or wood are appropriate materials for steps. 5.6 Avoid adding handrails or guardrails where they did not exist historically, particularly where visible from the street. • If handrails or guardrails are needed according to building code, keep their design simple in character and different from the historic detailing on the porch or balcony. Exhibit 1 HP Final Reviews October 2022 1020 East Cooper Project Response – A simple traditional open front porch with one step is approved facing Cooper Avenue. Framing within the historic building is unclear as to whether the front entry was an open porch or enclosed. An open porch is proposed at this time since it was a traditional characteristic of 19th century miner’s cabins, and an open porch aligns with the 1896 Willits map L shaped footprint. The street facing front porch has traditionally scaled columns as shown on Sheet A2.05. A side porch is proposed along the west elevation in the non-historic portion of the landmark to provide a private covered entry to the rear housing unit. The columns on the non-historic side porch are square with simple square base to differentiate the porch as new construction. Figure 3: Side porch and small addition at rear of landmark in non-historic construction. Figure 2: Details of restored historic front porch. Exhibit 1 HP Final Reviews October 2022 1020 East Cooper Project Architectural Details 6.1 Preserve significant architectural features. • Repair only those features that are deteriorated. • Patch, piece-in, splice, or consolidate to repair the existing materials, using recognized preservation methods whenever possible. • On AspenModern properties, repair is preferred, however, it may be more important to preserve the integrity of the original design intent, such as crisp edges, rather than to retain heavily deteriorated material. 6.2 When disassembly of a historic element is necessary for its restoration, use methods that minimize damage to the original material. • Document its location so it may be repositioned accurately. Always devise methods of replacing the disassembled material in its original configuration. 6.3 Remove only the portion of the detail that is deteriorated and must be replaced. • Match the original in composition, scale, and finish when replacing materials or features. • If the original detail was made of wood, for example, then the replacement material should be wood, when feasible. It should match the original in size and finish. 6.4 Repair or replacement of missing or deteriorated features are required to be based on original designs. • The design should be substantiated by physical or pictorial evidence to avoid creating a misrepresentation of the building’s heritage. • When reconstruction of an element is impossible because there is no historical evidence, develop a compatible new design that is a simplified interpretation of the original, and maintains similar scale, proportion and material. 6.5 Do not guess at “historic” designs for replacement parts. • Where scars on the exterior suggest that architectural features existed, but there is no other physical or photographic evidence, then new features may be designed that are similar in character to related buildings. • Using ornate materials on a building or adding new conjectural detailing for which there is no documentation is inappropriate. Response – Original architectural details are lost with the exception of the gable end inside the interior of the historic building. Details are simple, traditional, and similar to features found on other 19th century miner’s cabins. Please refer to Sheet A2.05 for architectural details of the column, windows, eave, foundation and front porch. Exhibit 1 HP Final Reviews October 2022 1020 East Cooper Project Roof 7.1 Preserve the original form of a roof. • Do not alter the angle of a historic roof. Preserve the orientation and slope of the roof as seen from the street. • Retain and repair original and decorative roof detailing. • Where the original roof form has been altered, consider restoration. 7.2 Preserve the original eave depth. • Overhangs contribute to the scale and detailing of a historic resource. • AspenModern properties typically have very deep or extremely minimal overhangs that are key character defining features of the architectural style. 7.3 Minimize the visual impacts of skylights and other rooftop devices. • Skylights and solar panels are generally not allowed on a historic structure. These elements may be appropriate on an addition. 7.4 New vents should be minimized, carefully placed, and painted a dark color. • Direct vents for fireplaces are generally not permitted to be added on historic structures. • Locate vents on non-street facing facades. • Use historic chimneys as chases for new flues when possible. 7.5 Preserve original chimneys, even if they are made non-functional. • Reconstruct a missing chimney when documentation exists. 7.6 A new dormer should remain subordinate to the historic roof in scale and character. • A new dormer is not appropriate on a primary, character defining façade. • A new dormer should fit within the existing wall plane. It should be lower than the ridgeline and set in from the eave. It should also be in proportion with the building. • The mass and scale of a dormer addition must be subordinate to the scale of the historic building. • While dormers improve the livability of upper floor spaces where low plate heights exist, they also complicate the roof and may not be appropriate on very simple structures. • Dormers are not generally not permitted on AspenModern properties since they are not characteristics of these building styles. 7.7 Preserve original roof materials. • Avoid removing historic roofing material that is in good condition. When replacement is necessary, use a material that is similar to the original in both style as well as physical qualities and use a color that is similar to that seen historically. Exhibit 1 HP Final Reviews October 2022 1020 East Cooper Project 7.8 New or replacement roof materials should convey a scale, color and texture similar to the original. • If a substitute is used, such as composition shingle, the roof material should be earth tone and have a matte, non-reflective finish. • Flashing should be in scale with the roof material. • Flashing should be tin, lead coated copper, galvanized or painted metal and have a matte, non- reflective finish. • Design flashing, such as drip edges, so that architectural details are not obscured. • A metal roof is inappropriate for an Aspen Victorian primary home but may be appropriate for a secondary structure from that time period. • A metal roof material should have a matte, non-reflective finish and match the original seaming. 7.9 Avoid using conjectural features on a roof. • Adding ornamental cresting, for example, where there is no evidence that it existed, creates a false impression of the building’s original appearance, and is inappropriate. 7.10 Design gutters so that their visibility on the structure is minimized to the extent possible. • Downspouts should be placed in locations that are not visible from the street if possible, or in locations that do not obscure architectural detailing on the building. • The material used for the gutters should be in character with the style of the building. Response – The existing roof form is proposed to remain as is with a new dormer at the rear of the landmark. Cedar shingles are proposed to replace the existing asphalt roof on the landmark. Gutters, snow fences and downspouts are down on Sheet A1.10. Figure 4: Roof plan. Exhibit 1 HP Final Reviews October 2022 1020 East Cooper Project New Building Building Placement 11.1 Orient the new building to the street. • AspenVictorian buildings should be arranged parallel to the lot lines, maintaining the traditional grid pattern. • AspenModern alignments shall be handled case by case. • Generally, do not set the new structure forward of the historic resource. Alignment of their front setbacks is preferred. An exception may be made on a corner lot or where a recessed siting for the new structure is a better preservation outcome. Response – The new building is located behind the landmark and along the alley. It is parallel to the lot lines which is consistent with the traditional grid pattern. Setback variances are not requested for the new building. Figure 5: Approved conceptual rendering of Cooper Avenue façade. Mass and Scale 11.2 In a residential context, clearly define the primary entrance to a new building by using a front porch. • The front porch shall be functional, and used as the means of access to the front door. • A new porch must be similar in size and shape to those seen traditionally. Exhibit 1 HP Final Reviews October 2022 1020 East Cooper Project Response – The entrance to the new building faces the street with a full light door and transom to relate to the landmark. Figure 6: Cooper Avenue façade of new building located behind historic landmark. 11.3 Construct a new building to appear similar in scale and proportion with the historic buildings on a parcel. • Subdivide larger masses into smaller “modules” that are similar in size to the historic buildings on the original site. • Reflect the heights and proportions that characterize the historic resource. Response – The proposed L shaped footprint of the new building directly references the historic building’s footprint. The prominent gable roof form has a similar pitch to the historic building. Material application on the new building create smaller modules that relate to the historic landmark. Sliding wood shutters and windows of a similar proportion to the landmark are proposed to add interest and to break up the façade of the building. Vertical wood board and batten on the upper level of the alley building adds depth and dimension to the front façade. Galvanized metal siding is proposed along the first level which relates to the metal foundation around the landmark. See also response to 11.4 below. Exhibit 1 HP Final Reviews October 2022 1020 East Cooper Project Figure 7: Front elevation of new building. 11.4 Design a front elevation to be similar in scale to the historic building. • The primary plane of the front shall not appear taller than the historic structure. Response – The new building contextually sits between three story buildings to the east and west of the 1020 property, and successfully completes the streetscape in this high density residential neighborhood while preserving a one story historic cabin at the front of the property. Decks and open stairs are proposed behind the landmark to break up the mass and to provide relief to the Riverside Condominiums. 11.5 The intent of the historic landmark lot split is to remove most of the development potential from the historic resource and place it in the new structure. • This should be kept in mind when determining how floor area will be allocated between structures proposed as part of a lot split. Response – A historic lot split is not proposed on this property; however, a new detached building is proposed that removes development pressure from the landmark into the new construction. 11.6 Design a new structure to be recognized as a product of its own time. • Consider these three aspects of a new building; form, materials, and fenestration. A project must relate strongly to the historic resource in at least two of these elements. Departing from the historic resource in one of these categories allows for creativity and a contemporary design response. Exhibit 1 HP Final Reviews October 2022 1020 East Cooper Project • When choosing to relate to building form, use forms that are similar to the historic resource. • When choosing to relate to materials, use materials that appear similar in scale and finish to those used historically on the site and use building materials that contribute to a traditional sense of human scale. • When choosing to relate to fenestration, use windows and doors that are similar in size and shape to those of the historic resource. Response – The new building relates to building form and material application. Windows are rectangular but are contemporary along the front (south) elevation to maximize natural light and views of Aspen Mountain. Building form relates to the landmark in footprint, roof form, and roof pitch. Wood is proposed as the primary material to relate to the landmark. A mix of lap siding and vertical wood boards are proposed to add interest and to distinguish between new and historic construction. 11.7 The imitation of older historic styles is discouraged. • This blurs the distinction between old and new buildings. • Overall, details shall be modest in character. Response – The new building is clearly a product of its own time while simultaneously supporting and highlighting the historic landmark. Details are subtle in nature and materials are durable to limit capital expenses for the affordable housing residents. Figure 8: Application of wood siding on west elevation of new building differentiates the two eras of construction while still maintaining a strong architectural relationship. DATE: PROJECT NAME: PROJECT ADDRESS: APPLICANT CONTACT INFORMATION: NAME, COMPANY, ADDRESS, PHONE, EMAIL Peak Hour Max Trips Generated MMLOS TDM Total Trips Mitigated PM 2.7 8 0.01 8.01 0.00 Click on the "Generate Narrative" Button to the right. Respond to each of the prompts in the space provided. Each response should cover the following: 1. Explain the selected measure. 2. Call out where the measure is located. 3. Demonstrate how the selected measure is appropriate to enhance the project site and reduce traffic impacts. 4. Explain the Enforcement and Financing Plan for the selected measure. 5. Explain the scheduling and implementation responsibility of the mitigation measure. 6. Attach any additional information and a site map to the narrative report. Sara Adams BendonAdams 300 S. Spring St. #202, Aspen CO 81621 970-925-2855 sara@bendonadams.com Summary and Narrative: Narrative: 10/24/2022 1020 East Cooper Project 1020 East Cooper Avenue Trip Generation SUMMARY Trip Mitigation NET TRIPS TO BE MITIGATED Project Description In the space below provide a description of the proposed project. A single family home is proposed to be converted into a 4-unit affordable housing project. Two onsite parking spaces are proposed. A bike rack is provided for residents and a year membership to the City's car-to-go program is proposed for each unit to promote alternative forms of transportation and to discourage car ownership. MMLOS Include any additional information that pertains to the MMLOS plan in the space provided below. A bike rack is proposed on the property. A bear proof trash can is proposed for the Mountain Valley RFTA bus stop as suggested by the Transportation Department. TDM Provide details in the space provided for the proposed carshare participation. Carshare programs have been linked to increased use of alternative transportation modes and reduced SOV trips. The successful project will provide access to Aspen’s CAR TO GO carshare program. Trip reduction potential will depend on the level to which the development participates. Car share memberships can be provided to all employees or residents of new developments. A year membership will be provided to all initial and eligible tenants in the project. A year membership promotes use of the carshare program and discourages car ownership. Explain the proposed trip reduction marketing/incentive program in the space provided. A trip reduction marketing programs should include a number of the following strategies: orientation to trip reduction programs and benefits; orientation to specific alternative transportation modes such as bus service information, bike/walk route maps, etc.; publishing of web or traditional informational materials; events and contests such as commuter fairs, new employee orientations, bike to work days, etc.; educational opportunities such bicycle commute/repair classes; web or traditional materials aimed at guests/customers such as bike/walk maps, free transit day passes, etc.; incentive programs such as prizes, rewards or discounts for alternative commuting. Alternative forms of transporation, RFTA schedules and information, bike/trail maps, and information about Wecycle will be included in a welcome package for new renters. Include any additional information that pertains to the TDM plan in the space provided below. We are open to other options for a 100% residential project. MMLOS Site Plan Requirements Include the following on a site plan. Clearly call out and label each measure. Attach the site plan to the TIA submittal. Enforcement and Financing Enforcement is the responsibility of the City and APCHA. Financing for the carshare program will be through the employers that own the unit. Scheduling and Implementation Responsibility of Mitigation Measures Provide an overview of the scheduling and implementation responsibility for the proposed transportation mitigation measures. Slopes Between Back of Curb and Sidewalk 2% Slope at Pedestrian Driveway Crossings Pedestrian Directness Factor (See callout number 9 on the MMLOS sheet for an example) Bicycle Parking Bus Stop Trash Recepticle Provide an overview of the Enforcement and Financing plan for the proposed transportation mitigation measures. Transportation measures will be implemented at the time of unit occupation. Monitoring and Reporting Provide a monitoring and reporting plan. Refer to page 17 in the Transportation Analysis Guidelines for a list of monitoring plan requirements. Components of a Monitoring and Reporting Plan should include (1) Assessment of compliance with guidelines, (2) Results and effectiveness of implemented measures, (3) Identification of additional strategies, and (4) Surveys and other supporting data. The TIA can be audited by the City of Aspen or APCHA to confirm compliance. = input = calculation DATE: PROJECT NAME: PROJECT ADDRESS: APPLICANT CONTACT INFORMATION: NAME, COMPANY, ADDRESS, PHONE, EMAIL Minor Entering Exiting Total Entering Exiting Total Commercial (sf)0.0 sf 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Free-Market Housing (Units)-1 Units -0.19 -0.48 -0.67 -0.46 -0.36 -0.82 Affordable Housing (Units)4 Units 1.44 1.56 3.00 1.96 1.60 3.56 Lodging (Units)0 Units 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Essential Public Facility (sf)0.0 sf 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.25 1.08 2.33 1.50 1.24 2.74 Land Use Trip Rate %Entering %Exiting Trip Rate %Entering %Exiting Commercial 2.27 0.69 0.31 4.14 0.4 0.6 Free-Market Housing 0.67 0.29 0.71 0.82 0.56 0.44 Affordable Housing 0.75 0.48 0.52 0.89 0.55 0.45 Lodging 0.25 0.57 0.43 0.31 0.52 0.48 Essential Public Facility 0.86 0.62 0.38 1.66 0.4 0.6 Net New Units/Square Feet of the Proposed ProjectProposed Land Use *For mixed-use (at least two of the established land uses) sites, a 4% reduction for AM Peak-Hour and a 14% reduction for PM Peak-Hour is applied to the trip generation. Sara Adams BendonAdams 300 S. Spring St. #202, Aspen CO 81621 970-925-2855 sara@bendonadams.com Trip Generation 10/24/2022 AM Peak Average PM Peak Average Trips Generated AM Peak-Hour PM Peak-Hour TOTAL NEW TRIPS ASSUMPTIONS ASPEN TRIP GENERATION Is this a major or minor project? 1020 East Cooper Avenue 1020 East Cooper Project Instructions: IMPORTANT: Turn on Macros: In order for code to run correctly the security settings need to be altered. Click "File" and then click "Excel Options." In the "Trust Center"category, click "Trust Center Settings", and then click the "Macro Settings"category. Beneath "Macro Settings" select "Enable all Macros." Sheet 1. Trip Generation: Enter the project's square footage and/or unit counts under Proposed Land Use. The numbers should reflect the net change in land use between existing and proposed conditions. If a landuse is to be reduced put a negative number of units or square feet. Sheet 2. MMLOS: Answer Yes, No, or Not Applicable under each of the Pedestrian, Bike and Transit sections.Points are only awarded for proposed (not existing) and confirmed aspects of the project. Sheet 3. TDM: Choose the mitigation measures that are appropriate for your project. Sheet 4. Summary and Narrative: Review the summary of the project's mitigated trips and provide a narrative which explains the measures selected for the project. Click on "Generate Narrative" and individually explain each measure that was chosen and how it enhances the site or mitigates vehicle traffic. Ensure each selected measure make sense for the project site and are improvements to the current condition. Minor Development -Inside the Roundabout Major Development -Outside the Roundabout Helpful Hints: 1. Refer to the Transportation Impact Analysis Guidelines for information on the use of this tool. 2. Refer to TIA Frequently Asked Questions for a quick overview. 2. Hover over red corner tags for additional information on individual measures. 3. Proposed TDM or MMLOS measures should be new and/or an improvement of existing conditions. A project will not receive credit for measures already in place. Proposed TDM or MMLOS measures should also make sense in the context of project location and future use. 4. A glossary sheet is provided as an additional tab. Typical terms are defined within this glossary. Transportation Impact Analysis TIA Frequently Asked Questions = input = calculation 8 Category Sub.Measure Number Question Answer Points 1 Does the project propose a detached sidewalk where an attached sidewalk currently exists? Does the proposed sidewalk and buffer meet standard minimum widths? No 0 2 Is the proposed effective sidewalk width greater than the standard minimum width?No 0 3 Does the project propose a landscape buffer greater than the standard minimum width?No 0 0 4 Does the project propose a detached sidewalk on an adjacent block? Does the proposed sidewalk and buffer meet standard minimum widths? No 0 5 Is the proposed effective sidewalk width on an adjacent block greater than the standard minimum width?No 0 6 Is the proposed landscape buffer on an adjacent block greater than the standard minimum width?No 0 0 7 Are slopes between back of curb and sidewalk equal to or less than 5%?Yes 0 8 Are curbs equal to (or less than) 6 inches?Yes 0 9 Is new large-scale landscaping proposed that improves the pedestrian experience? Properties within the Core do not have ample area to provide the level of landscaping required to receive credit in this category. No 0 10 Does the project propose an improved crosswalk? This measure must get City approval before receiving credit. No 0 0 11 Are existing driveways removed from the street?No 0 12 Is pedestrian and/or vehicle visibility unchanged by new structure or column?Yes 0 13 Is the grade (where pedestrians cross) on cross-slope of driveway 2% or less?Yes 0 14 Does the project propose enhanced pedestrian access points from the ROW? This includes improvements to ADA ramps or creating new access points which prevent pedestrians from crossing a street. No 0 15 Does the project propose enhanced pedestrian or bicyclist interaction with vehicles at driveway areas?No 0 0 16 Is the project's pedestrian directness factor less than 1.5?Yes 0 17 Does the project propose new improvements which reduce the pedestrian directness factor to less than 1.2? A site which has an existing pedestrian directness factor less than 1.2 cannot receive credit in this category. No 0 18 Is the project proposing an off site improvement that results in a pedestrian directness factor below 1.2?* No 0 19 Are traffic calming features proposed that are part of an approved plan (speed humps, rapid flash)?*No 0 0 20 Are additional minor improvements proposed which benefit the pedestrian experience and have been agreed upon with City of Aspen staff? No 0 21 Are additional major improvements proposed which benefit the pedestrian experience and have been agreed upon with City of Aspen staff? No 0 0 0PedestriansSubtotalAdditional Proposed ImprovementsTOTAL NUMBER OF TRIPS MITIGATED:Pedestrian RoutesTraffic Calming and Pedestrian NetworkDriveways, Parking, and Access ConsiderationsMMLOS Input Page Subtotal SubtotalSidewalk Condition on Adjacent BlocksSidewalk Condition on Project FrontageSubtotal Instructions: Answer Yes, No, or Not Applicable to each measure under the Pedestrian, Bike and Transit sections. Subtotal Subtotal Pedestrian Total* Category Sub.Measure Number Question Answer Points 22 Is a new bicycle path being implemented with City approved design?No 0 23 Do new bike paths allow access without crossing a street or driveway?No 0 24 Is there proposed landscaping, striping, or signage improvements to an existing bicycle path?No 0 25 Does the project propose additional minor bicycle improvements which have been agreed upon with City of Aspen staff?No 0 26 Does the project propose additional major bicycle improvements which have been agreed upon with City of Aspen staff?No 0 0 Bicycle Parking27 Is the project providing bicycle parking?Yes 5 5 5 Category Sub.Measure Number Question Answer Points 28 Is seating/bench proposed?No 0 29 Is a trash receptacle proposed?Yes 3 30 Is transit system information (signage) proposed?NA 0 31 Is shelter/shade proposed?No 0 32 Is enhanced pedestrian-scale lighting proposed?No 0 33 Is real-time transit information proposed?No 0 34 Is bicycle parking/storage proposed specifically for bus stop use?No 0 35 Are ADA improvements proposed?No 0 3 36 Is a bus pull-out proposed at an existing stop?No 0 37 Is relocation of a bus stop to improve transit accessibility or roadway operations proposed?No 0 38 Is a new bus stop proposed (with minimum of two basic amenities)?No 0 0 3TransitBasic AmenitiesSubtotal Subtotal Enhanced AmenitiesSubtotal Subtotal Bicycles Total* Transit Total*BicyclesModifications to Existing Bicycle Paths Category Measure Number Sub. Question Answer Strategy VMT Reductions Will an onsite ammenities strategy be implemented?No Which onsite ammenities will be implemented? Will a shared shuttle service strategy be implemented?NA What is the degree of implementation? What is the company size? What percentage of customers are eligible? 3 Nonmotorized Zones Will a nonmotorized zones strategy be implemented?NA 0.00% 0.00% Category Measure Number Sub. Question Answer Strategy VMT Reductions Will a network expansion stragtegy be implemented?NA What is the percentage increase of transit network coverage? What is the existing transit mode share as a % of total daily trips? Will a service frequency/speed strategy be implemented?NA What is the percentage reduction in headways (increase in frequency)? What is the existing transit mode share as a % of total daily trips? What is the level of implementation? Will a transit access improvement strategy be implemented?NA What is the extent of access improvements? 7 Intercept Lot Will an intercept lot strategy be implemented?NA 0.00% 0.00% Category Measure Number Sub. Question Answer Strategy VMT Reductions Will there be participation in TOP?No What percentage of employees are eligible?100% Is a transit fare subsidy strategy implemented?NA What percentage of employees are eligible? What is the amount of transit subsidy per passenger (daily equivalent)? Is an employee parking cash-out strategy being implemented?NA What percentage of employees are eligible? Is a workplace parking pricing strategy implemented?NA What is the daily parking charge? What percentage of employees are subject to priced parking? Is a compressed work weeks strategy implemented?NA What percentage of employees are participating? What is the workweek schedule? Is an employer sponsered shuttle program implemented?NA What is the employer size? What percentage of employees are eligible? Is a carpool matching strategy implemented?NA What percentage of employees are eligble? Is carshare participation being implemented?Yes How many employee memberships have been purchased?<100 What percentage of employees are eligble?100% Is participation in the bikeshare program WE-cycle being implemented?NA How many memberships have been purchased?<100 What percentage of employees/guests are eligble?100% Is an end of trip facilities strategy being implemented?NA What is the degree of implementation? What is the employer size? Is a self-funded emergency ride home strategy being implemented?NA What percentage of employees are eligible? Is a carpool/vanpool priority parking strategy being implemented?NA What is the employer size? What number of parking spots are available for the program? Is a private employer shuttle strategy being implemented?NA What is the employer size? What percentage of employees are eligible? Is a trip reduction marketing/incentive program implemented?Yes What percentage of employees/guests are eligible? 0.44% 0.00% 0.44% 1. 22% work trips represents a mixed-used site (SF Bay Area Travel Survey). See Assumptions Tab for more detail. 21 16 17 18 19 20 11 12 13 14 15 Participation in TOP Transit Fare Subsidy Employee Parking Cash-Out Workplace Parking Pricing Compressed Work Weeks Employer Sponsored Vanpool Carpool Matching Carshare Program Self-funded Emergency Ride Home Carpool/Vanpool Priority Parking Private Employer Shuttle Trip Reduction Marketing/Incentive Program End of Trip Facilities Cross Category Maximum Reduction, Neighborhood and Transit Global Maximum VMT Reductions TDM Input Page 0.00% 0.00% 0.00%Commute Trip Reduction Programs StrategiesOnsite Servicing Shared Shuttle Service Neighborhood/Site Enhancements Strategies0.00% 0.00% Network Expansion Service Frequency/Speed Transit Access Improvement Maximum Reduction Allowed in Category 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 2.00% Bikeshare Program 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% Maximum Reduction Allowed in Category Maximum Reduction Allowed in CategoryTransit System Improvements Strategies1 2 4 5 6 8 9 10 Instructions TDM: Choose the mitigation measures that are appropriate for your project. Proposed TDM or MMLOS measures should be new and/or an improvement of existing conditions. A project will not receive credit for measures already in place. Proposed TDM or MMLOS measures should also make sense in the context of project location and future use. PRE-APPLICATION CONFERENCE SUMMARY PLANNER: Amy Simon, amy.simon@cityofaspen.com DATE: August 27, 2019 PROJECT LOCATION: 1020 E. Cooper Avenue REQUEST: Major Development, Demolition, Relocation, Growth Management, Affordable Housing Credits REPRESENTATIVE: Sara Adams, sara@bendonadams.com DESCRIPTION: 1020 E. Cooper is a landmark designated property which contains a heavily altered Victorian era single family home. Two outbuildings, date of construction unknown, sit at the rear of the site. The lot is 4,379 square feet in size and is located in the RMF zone district. Because the minimum lot area for the zone district is 6,000 square feet, 1020 E. Cooper is considered to be a non-conforming lot of record. Landmark designation permits the site to be developed with any of the allowed RMF uses, according to Section 26.312 of the Municipal Code. A potential purchaser in interested in creating multi-family housing and affordable housing credits. This will require review by the Historic Preservation Commission which is likely to include a proposal to demolish the sheds at the rear of the site, to demolish non-historic additions to the miner’s cottage, to re-position the miner’s cottage and to expand above and below grade. Setback variations may be requested. A tree that straddles the east property line is to be protected and retained in the redevelopment. Please refer to the RMF zone district for guidance on dimensional requirements. The parking requirement is 1 parking unit per dwelling unit which may be provided as a mix of on-site parking, TIA measures and cash- in-lieu. At least one on-site space would likely need to be accessible and approximately twice the width of a standard parking space. In addition, the alley frontage will need to include adequate trash and recycling storage and utilities. Prior to the preparation of a recommendation to HPC, staff will refer the application to other City Departments for comments and proposed conditions of approval. The applicant will be required to prepare a Transportation Impact Analysis for Engineering Review. The first review step will be Conceptual design, Demolition, Relocation, Variations, Growth Management, and Affordable Housing Credits. Following Conceptual approval, staff will inform Council of HPC’s decision, allowing them the opportunity to “call up” any aspects of the approval that they find require additional discussion. This is standard practice for all significant reviews before HPC. The last step is Final design review. RELEVANT LAND USE CODE SECTIONS: Section Number Section Title 26.304 Common Development Review Procedures 26.304.035 Neighborhood Outreach 26.312.050 Nonconforming Lots of Record 26.415.070.D Major Development 26.415.080 Demolition 26.415.090 Relocation 26.415.110.C Historic Preservation Variations, Benefits 26.470.080 General Review Standards: Affordable Housing 26.470.100.C Planning and Zoning Commission Applications, Affordable Housing 26.515 Transportation and Parking Management 26.540.070 Review Criteria for Establishing an Affordable Housing Credit 26.575.020 Calculations and Measurements 26.600 Impact Fees 26.620 School Land Dedication 26.710.090 Residential Multi-Family (RMF) Zone District 12.10.050 Trash Storage Space Required for Multi-Family Developments For your convenience – links to the Land Use Application and Land Use Code are below: Land Use Application Land Use Code Historic Preservation Design Guidelines Review by: Staff for completeness and recommendations HPC for determinations Public Hearing: Yes Neighborhood Outreach: Yes Referrals: Yes, Engineering, Parks, APCHA, Environmental Health Fees: Conceptual- $3,250 for 10 billable hours of planning staff time plus referral fees in the amount of $325 deposit for 1 hour of Engineering Review, a $975 flat fee for Parks, a $975 flat fee for APCHA and a $975 flat fee for Environmental Health for a total of $6,500. (Additional/ lesser deposit hours will be billed/ refunded at a rate of $325 per hour) Final- $1,950 for 6 billable hours of planning staff time. (Additional/ lesser deposit hours will be billed/ refunded at a rate of $325 per hour) APPLICATION CHECKLIST: Below is a list of submittal requirements. Please email the application as one pdf to amy.simon@cityofaspen.com for an initial determination of completeness. Completed Land Use Application and signed Fee Agreement. Pre-application Conference Summary (this document). Street address and legal description of the parcel on which development is proposed to occur, consisting of a current (no older than 6 months) certificate from a title insurance company, an ownership and encumbrance report, or attorney licensed to practice in the State of Colorado, listing the names of all owners of the property, and all mortgages, judgments, liens, easements, contracts and agreements affecting the parcel, and demonstrating the owner’s right to apply for the Development Application. Applicant’s name, address and telephone number in a letter signed by the applicant that states the name, address and telephone number of the representative authorized to act on behalf of the applicant. HOA Compliance form List of adjacent property owners for both properties within 300’ for public hearing. An 8 1/2” by 11” vicinity map locating the parcel within the City of Aspen. Site improvement survey including topography and vegetation showing the current status, certified by a registered land surveyor, licensed in the state of Colorado. A written description of the proposal and an explanation of how the proposed development complies with the relevant review standards and design guidelines (please note that landmarks are except from the Residential Design Standards.) Scaled site plan and drawings of all proposed structures or additions. A written report from a licensed engineer or architect regarding the soundness of the miner’s cottage to be relocated. Evidence of the financial ability to undertake the safe relocation, preservation and repair of the miner’s cottage through the posting of bonds or other financial measures deemed appropriate. Supplemental materials to provide a visual description of the context surrounding the designated historic property including photographs and other exhibits, as needed, to accurately depict location and extent of proposed work. The net livable square footage of each residential unit in the development. If applicable, the conditions under which reductions from net minimum livable square footage requirements are requested according to APCHA guidelines. Proposed Category Designation of sale or rental restriction for each unit in the development. Proposed employees housed by the affordable housing unit in increments of no less than one one- hundredth (0.01) according to Section 26.470.100.2- Employees Housed. A mobility plan meeting the requirements of Chapter 26.515 of the Aspen Municipal Code. For Conceptual the following items will need to be submitted in addition to the items listed above: • Graphics identifying preliminary selection of primary exterior building materials. • A preliminary stormwater design. For Final the following items will need to be submitted in addition to the items listed above: • Drawings of the street facing facades must be provided at ¼” scale. • Final selection of all exterior materials and sample or clearly illustrated photographs. • A lighting plan and landscape plan, including any visible stormwater mitigation features. Once the copy is deemed complete by staff, the application fee will be requested. Disclaimer: The foregoing summary is advisory in nature only and is not binding on the City. The summary is based on current zoning, which is subject to change in the future, and upon factual representations that may or may not be accurate. The summary does not create a legal or vested right. CITY OF ASPEN COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT City of Aspen|130 S. Galena St.|(970) 920 5090 April 2020 LAND USE APPLICATION APPLICANT: REPRESENTIVATIVE: Description: Existing and Proposed Conditions Review: Administrative or Board Review Required Land Use Review(s): Growth Management Quota System (GMQS) required fields: Net Leasable square footage Lodge Pillows Free Market dwelling units Affordable Housing dwelling units Essential Public Facility square footage Have you included the following? FEES DUE: $ Pre-Application Conference Summary Signed Fee Agreement HOA Compliance form All items listed in checklist on PreApplication Conference Summary Name: Address: Phone#: email: Address: Phone #: email: Name: Project Name and Address: Parcel ID # (REQUIRED) Land Title Guarantee Company Customer Distribution PREVENT FRAUD - Please remember to call a member of our closing team when initiating a wire transfer or providing wiring instructions. Order Number:Q62014717 Date: 10/11/2022 Property Address:1020 E COOPER AVE, ASPEN, CO 81611 PLEASE CONTACT YOUR CLOSER OR CLOSER'S ASSISTANT FOR WIRE TRANSFER INSTRUCTIONS For Closing Assistance For Title Assistance Land Title Roaring Fork Valley Title Team 533 E HOPKINS #102 ASPEN, CO 81611 (970) 927-0405 (Work) (970) 925-0610 (Work Fax) valleyresponse@ltgc.com Seller/Owner 1020 COOPER LLC Delivered via: No Commitment Delivery Agent for Seller BENDONADAMS Attention: ERIN WACKERLE 300 S SPRING STREET SUITE 202 ASPEN, CO 81611 (970) 925-2855 (Work) erin@bendonadams.com Delivered via: Electronic Mail Land Title Guarantee Company Estimate of Title Fees Order Number:Q62014717 Date: 10/11/2022 Property Address:1020 E COOPER AVE, ASPEN, CO 81611 Parties: 1020 COOPER LLC, A COLORADO LIMITED LIABILITY COMPANY Visit Land Title's Website at www.ltgc.com for directions to any of our offices. Estimate of Title insurance Fees "TBD" Commitment $265.00 Total $265.00 If Land Title Guarantee Company will be closing this transaction, the fees listed above will be collected at closing. Thank you for your order! Note: The documents linked in this commitment should be reviewed carefully. These documents, such as covenants conditions and restrictions, may affect the title, ownership and use of the property. You may wish to engage legal assistance in order to fully understand and be aware of the implications of the effect of these documents on your property. Chain of Title Documents: Pitkin county recorded 05/31/2019 under reception no. 656317 Plat Map(s): Pitkin county recorded 10/08/2019 under reception no. 659373 Copyright 2006-2022 American Land Title Association. All rights reserved. The use of this Form is restricted to ALTA licensees and ALTA members in good standing as of the date of use. All other uses are prohibited. Reprinted under license from the American Land Title Association. Property Address: 1020 E COOPER AVE, ASPEN, CO 81611 1. Effective Date: 09/30/2022 at 5:00 P.M. 2. Policy to be Issued and Proposed Insured: "TBD" Commitment Proposed Insured: $0.00 3. The estate or interest in the land described or referred to in this Commitment and covered herein is: A FEE SIMPLE 4. Title to the estate or interest covered herein is at the effective date hereof vested in: 1020 COOPER LLC, A COLORADO LIMITED LIABILITY COMPANY 5. The Land referred to in this Commitment is described as follows: THE EASTERLY 13.79 FEET OF LOT O AND ALL OF LOT P, BLOCK 34, EAST ASPEN ADDITION TO THE CITY OF ASPEN, ACCORDING TO THE LOT LINE ADJUSTMENT/SUBDIVIS ION EXEMPTION PLAT OF 1020 E COOPER RECORDED OCTOBER 8, 2019 IN PLAT BOOK 126 AT PAGE 7 AS RECEPTION NO.659373. COUNTY OF PITKIN STATE OF COLORADO ALTA COMMITMENT Old Republic National Title Insurance Company Schedule A Order Number:Q62014717 ALTA COMMITMENT Old Republic National Title Insurance Company Schedule B, Part I (Requirements) Order Number: Q62014717 All of the following Requirements must be met: This proposed Insured must notify the Company in writing of the name of any party not referred to in this Commitment who will obtain an interest in the Land or who will make a loan on the Land. The Company may then make additional Requirements or Exceptions. Pay the agreed amount for the estate or interest to be insured. Pay the premiums, fees, and charges for the Policy to the Company. Documents satisfactory to the Company that convey the Title or create the Mortgage to be insured, or both, must be properly authorized, executed, delivered, and recorded in the Public Records. THIS COMMITMENT IS FOR INFORMATION ONLY, AND NO POLICY WILL BE ISSUED PURSUANT HERETO. This commitment does not republish any covenants, condition, restriction, or limitation contained in any document referred to in this commitment to the extent that the specific covenant, conditions, restriction, or limitation violates state or federal law based on race, color, religion, sex, sexual orientation, gender identity, handicap, familial status, or national origin. 1. Any facts, rights, interests, or claims thereof, not shown by the Public Records but that could be ascertained by an inspection of the Land or that may be asserted by persons in possession of the Land. 2. Easements, liens or encumbrances, or claims thereof, not shown by the Public Records. 3. Any encroachment, encumbrance, violation, variation, or adverse circumstance affecting the Title that would be disclosed by an accurate and complete land survey of the Land and not shown by the Public Records. 4. Any lien, or right to a lien, for services, labor or material heretofore or hereafter furnished, imposed by law and not shown by the Public Records. 5. Defects, liens, encumbrances, adverse claims or other matters, if any, created, first appearing in the public records or attaching subsequent to the effective date hereof but prior to the date of the proposed insured acquires of record for value the estate or interest or mortgage thereon covered by this Commitment. 6. (a) Taxes or assessments that are not shown as existing liens by the records of any taxing authority that levies taxes or assessments on real property or by the Public Records; (b) proceedings by a public agency that may result in taxes or assessments, or notices of such proceedings, whether or not shown by the records of such agency or by the Public Records. 7. (a) Unpatented mining claims; (b) reservations or exceptions in patents or in Acts authorizing the issuance thereof; (c) water rights, claims or title to water. 8. RIGHT OF PROPRIETOR OF A VEIN OR LODE TO EXTRACT AND REMOVE HIS ORE THEREFROM SHOULD THE SAME BE FOUND TO PENETRATE OR INTERSECT THE PREMISES AS RESERVED IN UNITED STATES PATENT RECORDED OCTOBER 21, 1955, IN BOOK 180 AT PAGE 454. 9. RIGHT OF WAY FOR DITCHES OR CANALS CONSTRUCTED BY THE AUTHORITY OF THE UNITED STATES AS RESERVED IN UNITED STATES PATENT RECORDED AUGUST 29, 1958, IN BOOK 185 AT PAGE 69. 10. EASEMENTS, CONDITIONS, COVENANTS, RESTRICTIONS, RESERVATIONS AND NOTES ON THE PLAT OF EAST ASPEN ADDITION RECORDED AUGUST 24, 1959 IN BOOK 2 AT PAGE 252. 11. EASEMENTS, NOTES, RIGHTS OF WAY AND ALL MATTERS AS SHOWN ON LOT LINE ADJUSTMENT/SUBDIVISION EXEMPTION PLAT OF 1020 E COOPER RECORDED OCTOBER 8, 2019 IN PLAT BOOK 126 AT PAGE 7 AS RECEPTION NO. 659373. 12. TERMS, CONDITIONS, PROVISIONS AND OBLIGATIONS AS SET FORTH IN RESOLUTION NO. 21, SERIES OF 2019 OF THE ASPEN HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION RECORDED DECEMBER 26, 2019 AT RECEPTION NO. 661468. ALTA COMMITMENT Old Republic National Title Insurance Company Schedule B, Part II (Exceptions) Order Number: Q62014717 13. TERMS, CONDITIONS, PROVISIONS AND OBLIGATIONS AS SET FORTH IN RESOLUTION NO. 15, SERIES OF 2021 OF THE ASPEN HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION RECORDED DECEMBER 14, 2021 AS RECEPTION NO. 683447. 14. TERMS, CONDITIONS, PROVISIONS AND OBLIGATIONS AS SET FORTH IN OCCUPANCY DEED RESTRICTION AND AGREEMENT RECORDED FEBRUARY 4, 2022 AS RECEPTION NO. 684956. 15. TERMS, CONDITIONS, PROVISIONS AND OBLIGATIONS AS SET FORTH IN RESTRICTIVE COVENANT RECORDED FEBRUARY 4, 2022 AS RECEPTION NO. 684957. 16. ANY FACTS, RIGHTS, INTERESTS OR CLAIMS WHICH MAY EXIST OR ARISE BY REASON OF THE FOLLOWING FACTS SHOWN ON IMPROVEMENT SURVEY PLAT CERTIFIED APRIL 30, 2019 PREPARED BY TUTTLE SURVEYING SERVICES, JOB #19053 SAID DOCUMENT STORED AS OUR ESI 37055467. ENCROACHMENT OF WOODEN SHEDS INTO THE ALLEY. ENCROACHMENT OF DRIP LINE OUTSIDE THE LOT LINE. 17. CLAIMS OF RIGHT, TITLE AND/OR INTEREST IN THE PROPERTY BETWEEN THE BOUNDARY LINES AND THE FENCES AS DEPICTED ON THE SURVEY PREPARED BY TUTTLE SURVEYING SERVICES, JOB NO. 19053 WHETHER SAID CLAIMS ARISE BY ABANDONMENT, ADVERSE POSSESSION OR OTHER MEANS. SAID DOCUMENT STORE AS OUR ESI 37055467 ALTA COMMITMENT Old Republic National Title Insurance Company Schedule B, Part II (Exceptions) Order Number: Q62014717 LAND TITLE GUARANTEE COMPANY DISCLOSURE STATEMENTS Note: Pursuant to CRS 10-11-122, notice is hereby given that: Note: Effective September 1, 1997, CRS 30-10-406 requires that all documents received for recording or filing in the clerk and recorder's office shall contain a top margin of at least one inch and a left, right and bottom margin of at least one half of an inch. The clerk and recorder may refuse to record or file any document that does not conform, except that, the requirement for the top margin shall not apply to documents using forms on which space is provided for recording or filing information at the top margin of the document. Note: Colorado Division of Insurance Regulations 8-1-2 requires that "Every title entity shall be responsible for all matters which appear of record prior to the time of recording whenever the title entity conducts the closing and is responsible for recording or filing of legal documents resulting from the transaction which was closed". Provided that Land Title Guarantee Company conducts the closing of the insured transaction and is responsible for recording the legal documents from the transaction, exception number 5 will not appear on the Owner's Title Policy and the Lenders Policy when issued. Note: Affirmative mechanic's lien protection for the Owner may be available (typically by deletion of Exception no. 4 of Schedule B, Section 2 of the Commitment from the Owner's Policy to be issued) upon compliance with the following conditions: No coverage will be given under any circumstances for labor or material for which the insured has contracted for or agreed to pay. The Subject real property may be located in a special taxing district.(A) A certificate of taxes due listing each taxing jurisdiction will be obtained from the county treasurer of the county in which the real property is located or that county treasurer's authorized agent unless the proposed insured provides written instructions to the contrary. (for an Owner's Policy of Title Insurance pertaining to a sale of residential real property). (B) The information regarding special districts and the boundaries of such districts may be obtained from the Board of County Commissioners, the County Clerk and Recorder, or the County Assessor. (C) The land described in Schedule A of this commitment must be a single family residence which includes a condominium or townhouse unit. (A) No labor or materials have been furnished by mechanics or material-men for purposes of construction on the land described in Schedule A of this Commitment within the past 6 months. (B) The Company must receive an appropriate affidavit indemnifying the Company against un-filed mechanic's and material-men's liens. (C) The Company must receive payment of the appropriate premium.(D) If there has been construction, improvements or major repairs undertaken on the property to be purchased within six months prior to the Date of Commitment, the requirements to obtain coverage for unrecorded liens will include: disclosure of certain construction information; financial information as to the seller, the builder and or the contractor; payment of the appropriate premium fully executed Indemnity Agreements satisfactory to the company, and, any additional requirements as may be necessary after an examination of the aforesaid information by the Company. (E) Note: Pursuant to CRS 10-11-123, notice is hereby given: This notice applies to owner's policy commitments disclosing that a mineral estate has been severed from the surface estate, in Schedule B-2. Note: Pursuant to CRS 10-1-128(6)(a), It is unlawful to knowingly provide false, incomplete, or misleading facts or information to an insurance company for the purpose of defrauding or attempting to defraud the company. Penalties may include imprisonment, fines, denial of insurance, and civil damages. Any insurance company or agent of an insurance company who knowingly provides false, incomplete, or misleading facts or information to a policyholder or claimant for the purpose of defrauding or attempting to defraud the policyholder or claimant with regard to a settlement or award payable from insurance proceeds shall be reported to the Colorado Division of Insurance within the Department of Regulatory Agencies. Note: Pursuant to Colorado Division of Insurance Regulations 8-1-3, notice is hereby given of the availability of a closing protection letter for the lender, purchaser, lessee or seller in connection with this transaction. Note: Pursuant to CRS 10-1-11(4)(a)(1), Colorado notaries may remotely notarize real estate deeds and other documents using real-time audio-video communication technology. You may choose not to use remote notarization for any document. That there is recorded evidence that a mineral estate has been severed, leased, or otherwise conveyed from the surface estate and that there is substantial likelihood that a third party holds some or all interest in oil, gas, other minerals, or geothermal energy in the property; and (A) That such mineral estate may include the right to enter and use the property without the surface owner's permission. (B) JOINT NOTICE OF PRIVACY POLICY OF LAND TITLE GUARANTEE COMPANY, LAND TITLE GUARANTEE COMPANY OF SUMMIT COUNTY LAND TITLE INSURANCE CORPORATION AND OLD REPUBLIC NATIONAL TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY This Statement is provided to you as a customer of Land Title Guarantee Company as agent for Land Title Insurance Corporation and Old Republic National Title Insurance Company. We want you to know that we recognize and respect your privacy expectations and the requirements of federal and state privacy laws. Information security is one of our highest priorities. We recognize that maintaining your trust and confidence is the bedrock of our business. We maintain and regularly review internal and external safeguards against unauthorized access to your non-public personal information ("Personal Information"). In the course of our business, we may collect Personal Information about you from: applications or other forms we receive from you, including communications sent through TMX, our web-based transaction management system; your transactions with, or from the services being performed by us, our affiliates, or others; a consumer reporting agency, if such information is provided to us in connection with your transaction; and The public records maintained by governmental entities that we obtain either directly from those entities, or from our affiliates and non-affiliates. Our policies regarding the protection of the confidentiality and security of your Personal Information are as follows: We restrict access to all Personal Information about you to those employees who need to know that information in order to provide products and services to you. We may share your Personal Information with affiliated contractors or service providers who provide services in the course of our business, but only to the extent necessary for these providers to perform their services and to provide these services to you as may be required by your transaction. We maintain physical, electronic and procedural safeguards that comply with federal standards to protect your Personal Information from unauthorized access or intrusion. Employees who violate our strict policies and procedures regarding privacy are subject to disciplinary action. We regularly assess security standards and procedures to protect against unauthorized access to Personal Information. WE DO NOT DISCLOSE ANY PERSONAL INFORMATION ABOUT YOU WITH ANYONE FOR ANY PURPOSE THAT IS NOT STATED ABOVE OR PERMITTED BY LAW. Consistent with applicable privacy laws, there are some situations in which Personal Information may be disclosed. We may disclose your Personal Information when you direct or give us permission; when we are required by law to do so, for example, if we are served a subpoena; or when we suspect fraudulent or criminal activities. We also may disclose your Personal Information when otherwise permitted by applicable privacy laws such as, for example, when disclosure is needed to enforce our rights arising out of any agreement, transaction or relationship with you. Our policy regarding dispute resolution is as follows: Any controversy or claim arising out of or relating to our privacy policy, or the breach thereof, shall be settled by arbitration in accordance with the rules of the American Arbitration Association, and judgment upon the award rendered by the arbitrator(s) may be entered in any court having jurisdiction thereof. Commitment For Title Insurance Issued by Old Republic National Title Insurance Company NOTICE IMPORTANT—READ CAREFULLY: THIS COMMITMENT IS AN OFFER TO ISSUE ONE OR MORE TITLE INSURANCE POLICIES. ALL CLAIMS OR REMEDIES SOUGHT AGAINST THE COMPANY INVOLVING THE CONTENT OF THIS COMMITMENT OR THE POLICY MUST BE BASED SOLELY IN CONTRACT. THIS COMMITMENT IS NOT AN ABSTRACT OF TITLE, REPORT OF THE CONDITION OF TITLE, LEGAL OPINION, OPINION OF TITLE, OR OTHER REPRESENTATION OF THE STATUS OF TITLE. THE PROCEDURES USED BY THE COMPANY TO DETERMINE INSURABILITY OF THE TITLE, INCLUDING ANY SEARCH AND EXAMINATION, ARE PROPRIETARY TO THE COMPANY, WERE PERFORMED SOLELY FOR THE BENEFIT OF THE COMPANY, AND CREATE NO EXTRACONTRACTUAL LIABILITY TO ANY PERSON, INCLUDING A PROPOSED INSURED. THE COMPANY’S OBLIGATION UNDER THIS COMMITMENT IS TO ISSUE A POLICY TO A PROPOSED INSURED IDENTIFIED IN SCHEDULE A IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE TERMS AND PROVISIONS OF THIS COMMITMENT. THE COMPANY HAS NO LIABILITY OR OBLIGATION INVOLVING THE CONTENT OF THIS COMMITMENT TO ANY OTHER PERSON. . COMMITMENT TO ISSUE POLICY Subject to the Notice; Schedule B, Part I—Requirements; Schedule B, Part II—Exceptions; and the Commitment Conditions, Old Republic National Title Insurance Company, a Minnesota corporation (the “Company”), commits to issue the Policy according to the terms and provisions of this Commitment. This Commitment is effective as of the Commitment Date shown in Schedule A for each Policy described in Schedule A, only when the Company has entered in Schedule A both the specified dollar amount as the Proposed Policy Amount and the name of the Proposed Insured. If all of the Schedule B, Part I—Requirements have not been met within 6 months after the Commitment Date, this Commitment terminates and the Company’s liability and obligation end. COMMITMENT CONDITIONS 1. DEFINITIONS 2. If all of the Schedule B, Part I—Requirements have not been met within the time period specified in the Commitment to Issue Policy, Commitment terminates and the Company’s liability and obligation end. 3. The Company’s liability and obligation is limited by and this Commitment is not valid without: 4.COMPANY’S RIGHT TO AMEND The Company may amend this Commitment at any time. If the Company amends this Commitment to add a defect, lien, encumbrance, adverse claim, or other matter recorded in the Public Records prior to the Commitment Date, any liability of the Company is limited by Commitment Condition 5. The Company shall not be liable for any other amendment to this Commitment. 5.LIMITATIONS OF LIABILITY i. comply with the Schedule B, Part I—Requirements; ii. eliminate, with the Company’s written consent, any Schedule B, Part II—Exceptions; or iii. acquire the Title or create the Mortgage covered by this Commitment. “Knowledge” or “Known”: Actual or imputed kno wledge, but not constructive notice imparted by the Public Records.(a) “Land”: The land described in Schedule A and affixed improvements that by law constitute real property. The term “Land” does not include any property beyond the lines of the area described in Schedule A, nor any right, title, interest, estate, or easement in abutting streets, roads, avenues, alleys, lanes, ways, or waterways, but this does not modify or limit the extent that a right of access to and from the Land is to be insured by the Policy. (b) “Mortgage”: A mortgage, deed of trust, or other security instrument, including one evidenced by electronic means authorized by law.(c) “Policy”: Each contract of title insurance, in a form adopted by the American Land Title Association, issued or to be issued by the Company pursuant to this Commitment. (d) “Proposed Insured”: Each person identified in Schedule A as the Proposed Insured of each Policy to be issued pursuant to this Commitment.(e) “Proposed Policy Amount”: Each dollar amount specified in Schedule A as the Proposed Policy Amount of each Policy to be issued pursuant to this Commitment. (f) “Public Records”: Records established under state statutes at the Commitment Date for the purpose of imparting constructive notice of matters relating to real property to purchasers for value and without Knowledge. (g) “Title”: The estate or interest described in Schedule A.(h) the Notice;(a) the Commitment to Issue Policy;(b) the Commitment Conditions;(c) Schedule A;(d) Schedule B, Part I—Requirements; and(e) Schedule B, Part II—Exceptions; and(f) a counter-signature by the Company or its issuing agent that may be in electronic form.(g) The Company’s liability under Commitment Condition 4 is limited to the Proposed Insured’s actual expense incurred in the interval between the Company’s delivery to the Proposed Insured of the Commitment and the delivery of the amended Commitment, resulting from the Proposed Insured’s good faith reliance to: (a) The Company shall not be liable under Commitment Condition 5(a) if the Proposed Insured requested the amendment or had Knowledge of the matter and did not notify the Company about it in writing. (b) The Company will only have liability under Commitment Condition 4 if the Proposed Insured would not have incurred the expense had the Commitment included the added matter when the Comm itment was first delivered to the Proposed Insured. (c) The Company’s liability shall not exceed the lesser of the Proposed Insured’s actual expense incurred in good faith and described in Commitment Conditions 5(a)(i) through 5(a)(iii) or the Proposed Policy Amount. (d) The Company shall not be liable for the content of the Transaction Identification Data, if any.(e) 6.LIABILITY OF THE COMPANY MUST BE BASED ON THIS COMMITMENT 7.IF THIS COMMITMENT HAS BEEN ISSUED BY AN ISSUING AGENT The issuing agent is the Company’s agent only for the limited purpose of issuing title insurance commitments and policies. The issuing agent is not the Company’s agent for the purpose of providing closing or settlement services. 8.PRO-FORMA POLICY The Company may provide, at the request of a Proposed Insured, a pro-forma policy illustrating the coverage that the Company may provide. A pro-forma policy neither reflects the status of Title at the time that the pro-forma policy is delivered to a Proposed Insured, nor is it a commitment to insure. 9.ARBITRATION The Policy contains an arbitration clause. All arbitrable matters when the Proposed Policy Amount is $2,000,000 or less shall be arbitrated at the option of either the Company or the Proposed Insured as the exclusive remedy of the parties. A Proposed Insured may review a copy of the arbitration rules at http://www.alta.org/arbitration. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, Land Title Insurance Corporation has caused its corporate name and seal to be affixed by its duly authorized officers on the date shown in Schedule A to be valid when countersigned by a validating officer or other authorized signatory. Issued by: Land Title Guarantee Company 3033 East First Avenue Suite 600 Denver, Colorado 80206 303-321-1880 Craig B. Rants, Senior Vice President This page is only a part of a 2016 ALTA® Commitment for Title Insurance issued by Old Republic National Title Insurance Company. This Commitment is not valid without the Notice; the Commitment to Issue Policy; the Commitment Conditions; Schedule A; Schedule B, Part I—Requirements; and Schedule B, Part II —Exceptions; and a counter-signature by the Company or its issuing agent that may be in electronic form. Copyright 2006-2016 American Land Title Association. All rights reserved. The use of this Form (or any derivative thereof) is restricted to ALTA licensees and ALTA members in good standing as of the date of use. All other uses are prohibited. Reprinted under license from the American Land Title Association. In no event shall the Company be obligated to issue the Policy referred to in this Commitment unless all of the Schedule B, Part I—Requirements have been met to the satisfaction of the Company. (f) In any event, the Company’s liability is limited by the terms and provisions of the Policy.(g) Only a Proposed Insured identified in Schedule A, and no other person, may make a claim under this Commitment.(a) Any claim must be based in contract and must be restricted solely to the terms and provisions of this Commitment.(b) Until the Policy is issued, this Commitment, as last revised, is the exclusive and entire agreement between the parties with respect to the subject matter of this Commitment and supersedes all prior commitment negotiations, representations, and proposals of any kind, whether written or oral, express or implied, relating to the subject matter of this Commitment. (c) The deletion or modification of any Schedule B, Part II—Exception does not constitute an agreement or obligation to provide coverage beyond the terms and provisions of this Commitment or the Policy. (d) Any amendment or endorsement to this Commitment must be in writing and authenticated by a person authorized by the Company.(e) When the Policy is issued, all liability and obligation under this Commitment will end and the Company’s only liability will be under the Policy.(f) 920 980 980 207 980 940 980 950 926 900 960 926926 925 935 926 935 926 1004 960 923 1004 926 950 1001 960 947 900 926900 960 927 1004 945 909 922 203 901 901 909 928 901 901 927 1001 909 901 926 909 909 943 909 901 941 901 935 901901 909 933 939 914 909 901 943 901 909 909 909 910 934 901 901 909 917 901 949 924 909 909 1006 1034 1015 1024 1034 1018 1007 1012 1034 1034 1001 1007 1024 1015 1024 1034 1012 1007 1033 1034 10341034 1007 1024 1001 1034 1020 1024 1007 1034 1006 1006 1001 1016 1034 1012 1034 1007 1001 1034 1015 1024 1007 1012 1000 1034 1034 1024 1015 1010 1022 1034 1012 1020 1014 1001 1015 1024 1022 1031 1024 1034 1020 1024 1007 1104 1104 332 1039 1039 1039 1039 1039 1020 1039 44010201039 1039 1039 1020 1039 1039 1039 1039 1039 1039 1101 1039 1020 1039 1039 1001 1039 1020 1039 1020 1001 1039 1039 1039 1039 1020 1039 1020 1039 1039 1039 1039 1039 1039 1020 1039 1001 1039 1039 1039 1023 212 CLEVELAND STE COO P E R A V E DALE AVES WEST END STE COOP E R A V E E HYM A N A V E E HYM A N A V E CLEVELAND STN RIVERSIDE AVECLEVELAND STE COO P E R A V E E DUR A N T A V E Date: 10/24/2022 Geographic Information Systems This map/drawing/image is a graphical representation of the features depicted and is not a legal representation. The accuracy may change depending on the enlargement or reduction. Copyright 2022 City of Aspen GIS 0 0.01 0.030.01 mi When printed at 8.5"x11" 4 Legend Historic Sites Parcels Roads Zoomed In Scale: 1:1,448 1020 East Cooper Avenue - Vicinity Map Pitkin County Mailing List of 300 Feet Radius Pitkin County GIS presents the information and data on this web site as a service to the public. Every effort has been made to ensure that the information and data contained in this electronic system is accurate, but the accuracy may change. The information maintained by the County may not be complete as to mineral estate ownership and that information should be determined by separate legal and property analysis. Pitkin County GIS makes no warranty or guarantee concerning the completeness, accuracy, or reliability of the content at this site or at other sites to which we link. Assessing accuracy and reliability of information and data is the sole responsibility of the user. The user understands he or she is solely responsible and liable for use, modification, or distribution of any information or data obtained on this web site. This document contains a Mailing List formatted to be printed on Avery 5160 Labels. If printing, DO NOT "fit to page" or "shrink oversized pages." This will manipulate the margins such that they no longer line up on the labels sheet. Print actual size. From Parcel: 273718232006 on 10/24/2022 Instructions: Disclaimer: http://www.pitkinmapsandmore.com 1020 EAST DURANT LLC PHILADELPHIA, PA 19147 1101 WASHINGTON AVE #V8 1020DURANT LLC WINNETKA, IL 60093 835 ASH ST 1039 E COOPER LLC COLORADO SPRINGS, CO 80906 2003 PINE GROVE AVE 203 S CLEVELAND LLC ASPEN, CO 81611 740 CASTLE CREEK DR 211 ASHLEY PROJECT LLC CHARLESTON, SC 29413 PO BOX 22424 220 WEST MAIN LLC AUSTIN, TX 78757 8500 SHOAL CREEK BLVD BLDG 4 #150 26 EAU CLAIRE LLC NEW ORLEANS, LA 70130 550 BIENVILLE ST 3 PEAKS LLC SUNFISH LAKE, MN 55118 260 SALEM CHURCH RD 306 ASSOCIATES LLC BLOOMFIELD HILLS, MI 48302 PO BOX 7067 913 NEVADA TRUST LAS VEGAS , NV 89148 9589 COMISKY CT 926 DURANT LLC WEST PALM BEACH, FL 33401 915 S DIXIE HWY ABELMAN STEPHEN C & HELENE P SAINT PETERSBURG, FL 33703 400 BAY LAUREL CT NE ABS 1012 LLC HOUSTON, TX 77057 6134 WILLERS WY AC ONE LLC LITTLE ROCK, AR 72203 PO BOX 3417 ALLEN JENNIFER C AUSTIN, TX 78746 6613 WHITEMARSH VALLEY WALK ARKIN ERIC ASPEN, CO 816111935 625 E MAIN ST #102B ARKIN JONATHAN ASPEN, CO 816111935 625 E MAIN ST #102B ARNOLD KARA ENGLEWOOD, CO 80113 3971 S HUDSON WY ASHCROFT MINISTRIES ASPEN, CO 81612 PO BOX 9983 ASPEN PAD LLC MIAMI BEACH, FL 33119 PO BOX 190754 ASPEN RIVERSIDE LLC CORAL GABLES, FL 33134 2600 CARDENA ST #PH1 ASPEN VALLEY LAND TRUST CARBONDALE, CO 81623 320 MAIN ST #204 ASPEN VILLAGER LLC ASPEN, CO 81611 1001 E COOPER AVE # 6 ASPENEYES LLC ASPEN, CO 81611 730 E DURANT AVE BARASH JAMES ROBERT & BETTEANNE COLORADO SPRINGS, CO 80906 50 W CHEYENNE MTN BLVD BARBERA IVANA CHATTANOOGA, TN 37405 345 FRAZIER AVE #206 BARBERA LAURA CHATTANOOGA, TN 37405 345 FRAZIER AVE #206 BELSHER ELIZABETH S TRUST PHOENIX, AZ 85018 4919 E GRANDVIEW LN BERENS MARILYN REV TRUST MIAMI BEACH, FL 33140 4925 COLLINS AVE #6A BERNI SHAEL MORGAN GREENWICH, CT 06830 660 STEAMBOAT RD 4TH FL BLUE SKYE DAISY BROOKE PARTNERSHIP LLLP ASPEN, CO 81611 1024 E HOPKINS #17 BMB 1 LLC ASPEN, CO 81612 PO BOX 8535 BOUSTEAD DOUGLAS ADIRONDACK, NY 12808 PO BOX 186 CAULFIELD JENNIFER & JOHN ASPEN, CO 81611 1020 E DURANT AVE #101 CGH LLC DALLAS, TX 75205 4417 S VERSAILLES CHADVALE REALTY INC ASPEN, CO 81612 PO BOX 11976 CHAMBERS ANDREW DALLAS, TX 75204 4017 BUENA VISTA ST #118 CHATEAU EAU CLAIRE CONDO ASSOC ASPEN, CO 81611 1034 E COOPER ST CHATEAU ROARING FORK CONDO ASSOC ASPEN, CO 81611 1039 E COOPER AVE CHATEAU ROARING FORK LLC NEW ALBANY, OH 43054 8000 WALTON PKWY #100 CHILES JAMES T & JENNIFER ALBRECHT DALLAS, TX 75202 901 MAIN #2600 CITY OF ASPEN ASPEN, CO 81611 427 RIO GRANDE PL COHEN STEPHAN L & SYDNEY G MIAMI BEACH, FL 33140 2401 COLLINS AVE #1601 COLETTA BRANDY MEMPHIS, TN 38103 41 UNION AVE #200 COLETTA CAROL MEMPHIS, TN 38103 41 UNION AVE #200 COOPER AVE VICTORIAN CONDO ASSOC ASPEN, CO 81611 1012 E COOPER AVE COOPER TACHE CHRISTEN ASPEN, CO 81611 1001 E HYMAN CRF TOWNHOUSE LLC ASPEN, CO 81612 PO BOX 4450 DERBY INVESTMENT INC WICHITA, KS 672181032 4601 E DOUGLAS AVE #111 DORAN MICHAEL H ASP TEST TRST NORCROSS, GA 30092 4280 GUNNIN RD DORNEMANN MICHAEL STAMFORD, CT 06901 70 FOREST ST #8A EAST COOPER COURT CONDO ASSOC ASPEN, CO 81612 PO BOX 2021 EHRMAN HOPE J LAKE FOREST, IL 60045 170 MARION AVE ELLSWEIG DAVID ASPEN, CO 81611 1020 E DURANT AVE #102 ERNEMANN MICHAEL FREDERICH LONDON EC #2A 4LX ENGLAND, LONDON FLAT 4 GALAXY HOUSE 32 LEONARD ST EUBANK CONDO ASSOC ASPEN, CO 81611 COMMON AREA 1022 E HYMAN AVE FEITH SUSAN WISCONSIN RAPIDS, WI 54494 700 BELLE ISLE FISHER ELIZABETH B CHAPEL HILL, NC 275178502 23120 UMSTEAD FISHER JAMES B JAMESTOWN , NC 27282 2709 ST ANDREWS CT FISHER WINSTON & JESSICA NEW YORK, NY 10171 299 PARK AVE 42ND FL FRANKLIN STREET TRUST DENVER, CO 80202 1555 BLAKE ST #507 GERDA HOLDINGS LLC BASALT, CO 81621 PO BOX 3979 GILLIAM KRISTI ASPEN, CO 81611 1024 E COOPER #8 GLEASON FAMILY LLC SIDNEY, OH 45365 235 OVERLAND DR GML ASPEN PROPERTY LLC FT WORTH, TX 76107 3815 LISBON ST #203 GOLDSTEIN BARRY J REV TRUST DENVER, CO 80246 950 S CHERRY ST #320 GONZALES CHRISTINE DALLAS, TX 75204 4017 BUENA VISTA ST #118 GRANTHAM CHARLES EDWARD RALEIGH, NC 27617 5849 LEASE LN GREGORY-CONZELMAN GWEN TRUST LAKE FOREST, IL 60045 410 LEXINGTON GUTNICK ERIC & MARY HANDELIN LIV TRUST FORT BRAGG, CA 95437 16299 PEARSON LN HANDZUS MICHAL HERMOSA BEACH, CA 90254 123 29TH ST HANN SANG E REV TRUST LAKE FOREST, IL 60045 555 MAYFLOWER RD HARTMAN STEVEN & HILLARY FAM TRUST BEVERLY HILLS, CA 90210 518 N HILLCREST RD HENRY CASADY MEREDITH TRUST ASPEN, CO 81611 525 W HALLAM ST HICKS LESLIE ASPEN, CO 81612 PO BOX 8225 HOLSTEIN MATTHEW & KATE ASPEN, CO 81611 947 E COOPER AVE HUCKELBUTT HOUSE LLC DALLAS, TX 75225 3924 SOUTHWESTERN BLVD HYMAN AVENUE VICTORIAN CONDO ASSOC ASPEN, CO 81611 COMMON AREA 990 E HYMAN AVE ILLMER NANCY & RICHARD DALLAS, TX 75201 1918 N OLIVE ST #1003 INDEPENDENCE CONDO ASSOC ASPEN, CO 81611 COMMON AREA 1104 DALE AVE INDEPENDENCE GATE CONDO ASSOC ASPEN, CO 81611 COMMON AREA 922 E COOPER AVE IPMD 2018 PROPERTY TRUST TOWN OF BLUE MOUNTAINS ONTARIO CANADA M9P1R5, 209523 HWY 26 JACOBS ROSS FARMINGTON, MI 48331 28009 HICKORY DR JACOBSON DAVID & ANDREA LYNN BLOOMFIELD HILLS, MI 48302 5255 PONVALLEY RD JOHNSON SALLYANNE C ASPEN, CO 81612 PO BOX 5050 JPS NEVADA TRUST HENDERSON, NV 890745991 1701 N GREEN VALLEY PKWY #9C KANIPE J STEPHEN & PATRICIA ASPEN, CO 81611 1015 E HYMAN AVE #3 KANTOR MITCHELL A TRUST BLOOMFIELD HILLS, MI 48301 5595 SHADOW LN KANTOR NANCY L TRUST BLOOMFIELD HILLS, MI 48302 5595 SHADOW LN KARASIK CHARLES SIOUX FALLS, SD 57186 BOX 00794325 KESSLER CONDOS ASSOC ASPEN, CO 81611 950/960 E DURANT AVE KOFFRON ROBERT & PAULETTE FARMINGTON HILLS, MI 48331 28009 HICKORY DR LEAL FAMILY INVESTMENTS LLC COCOA, FL 32926 3224 FAIRFAX LN LEAL FAMILY PARTNERS LTD COCOA , FL 32926 3224 FAIRFAX LANE LERNER JAY R & BOBETTE S OMAHA, NE 68154 10855 W DODGE RD #270 LEVY MITCHELL & ELISSA SANTA MONICA, CA 90402 201 OCEAN AVE #1203P LIB LLC PALO ALTO , CA 94301 314 LYTTON AVE #200 LIGHT LLC SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94105 575 MARKET ST #600 LITTLE JEWEL CONDO ASSOC ASPEN, CO 81611 COMMON AREA 1004 E DURANT AVE LITZENBERGER DREW & VIRGINIA ASHEVILLE, NC 28804 125 HOWLAND RD LITZENBERGER JOHN ASHEVILLE, NC 28804 125 HOWLAND RD LUPUL JOFFREY NEWPORT BEACH, CA 92663 3715 SEASHORE DR LYNN HOLLAND MANAGEMENT LLC AUSTIN, TX 78746 3404 RIVERCREST DR MARTIN MONICA A NEW YORK, NY 10021 301 E 79TH ST #35P MATALA TRUST DANA POINT, CA 92629 73 MONARCH BAY MATHIESON MICHAEL DENVER, CO 80206 155 STEELE ST 3617 MAXON PATRICIA ANNE TRUST TELLURIDE, CO 81435 PO BOX 4059 MAYOTTE MONICA & TERRY BOCA RATON, FL 33486 860 SW 21ST ST MCCORMICK MURIEL E ASPEN, CO 81612 PO BOX 3515 MCDONALD SCOTT PARK CITY, UT 84098 4666 MCKINNEY CT MCDONOUGH JOELLE ASPEN, CO 81611 1007 E HYMAN AVE #7 MCGAFFEY FAMILY & CO NO C LLC SEATTLE, WA 98109 2465 NOB HILL AVE NORTH MCMANUS SURVIVORS TRUST EL CAJON, CA 92020 1111 CRYSTAL LN MCPHEE SHARON S 1985 TRUST HONOLULU, HI 968163122 2260 PALOLO AVE MILETO EDWARD J JR & SARAH A BOYNTON BEACH, FL 33435 751 SW 33RD PL MJB GST TRUST SHAWNEE MISSION, KS 66208 5651 OAKWOOD RD MOLNY CONDO ASSOC ASPEN, CO 81611 COMMON AREA 1020 E HYMAN AVE MONTGOMERY JOHN MEMPHIS, TN 38103 41 UNION AVE #200 MORK HALBERT L FAMILY TRUST ROLLING HILLS, CA 90274 77 ASPEN WY MURACO JULIE DECLARATION TRUST NEW YORK , NY 101500662 PO BOX 662 MURACO JULIE TRUST NEW YORK, NY 10150 PO BOX 662 MURPHY RICHARD P & MARY K WATERLOO , NE 68069 24348 DOUGLAS CIRCLE NAGER DEBBIE TRUST LEAWOOD, KS 66209 4803 W 120TH PL NARK WILSON JANIS A ASPEN, CO 81611-4117 1039 E COOPER #5 NEW UTE LLC INDIANAPOLIS, IN 46260 8902 N MERIDIAN ST #205 NF COOPER LLC SOUTHFIELD, MI 48034 100 GALLERIA OFFICENTRE #427 NOORI ABDUL RASOL & MANDANA CARBONDALE, CO 81623 330 MILBURN NORMAN JEFFREY L & ANNA M ASPEN, CO 81611 730 E DURANT AVE NORTHROCK HOLDINGS LLC WARWICK WK 06 BERMUDA, UNIT 22 MIZZENTOP MIZZENTOP DR OGBURN TOM & CAROLYN WESTLAKE, TX 762624804 2000 BRAZOS CT OLSON PETER W & CANDICE C ASPEN , CO 81611 1022 E HYMAN AVE UNIT 1 OZIER FAMILY COLORADO LP WICHITA FALLS, TX 76310 2896 WRANGLERS RETREAT PACK R MICHAEL SAN DIEGO, CA 92108 5005 TEXAS ST STE 305 PALMERO KEN CARBONDALE , CO 81623 11 OLD ORCHARD RD PARADIGM PARTNERS DENVER, CO 80202 1543 WAZEE ST #400 PARGITER SALLY J ASPEN, CO 81611 943 E COOPER #C PBIA & CO PALM SPRINGS, FL 33461 1732 S CONGRESS AVE #323 PELVIC TRUST DENVER, CO 80218 1344 FRANKLIN ST PETERS JULIE ASPEN, CO 81612 PO BOX 1643 PETITIE ROCHE CONDO ASSOC ASPEN, CO 81611 COMMON AREA 926 E COOPER AVE PHILLIPS CARMEL WEBBER IRA CORONA DEL MAR, CA 92625 PO BOX 607 PIERCE ANITA M DAVENPORT, IA 52801 220 EMERSON PLACE STE 201 PINE GLEN TOWNHOUSE CONDO ASSOC ASPEN, CO 81611 COMMON AREA PLOTKE MICHELLE FARMINGTON, MI 48331 28009 HICKORY DR POLICARO DOMINIC FRANK ASPEN, CO 81611 1004 E DURANT #3 POLICARO FRANCO G ASPEN, CO 81611 1004 E DURANT AVE #2 PONDROM CYRENA N & LEE G MADISON, WI 53705 210 PRINCETON AVE PORTER FRANCES H CHAGRIN FALLS, OH 440222778 305 FALLS WALK WAY PORTER FRANK H JR CHAGRIN FALLS, OH 44022 33970 MEADOW LN PORTNOY GERALD A REV TRUST MINNEAPOLIS, MN 554145138 222 2ND ST SE #701 PRISM VENTURE ASPEN LLC INCLINE VILLAGE, NV 89451-7614 774 MAYS BLVD #10-231 PULLEN CLAUDIA CHATTANOOGA, TN 37405 345 FRAZIER AVE #206 RANGER LIVING TRUST CHESTERFIELD, MO 63017 445 WHITESTONE FARM DR RIVERSIDE CONDO ASSOC ASPEN, CO 81611 1024 E COOPER AVE RK PARTNERS LLC SHORT HILLS, NJ 07078 31 WASHINGTON AVE ROARING FORK 17A LLC DALLAS, TX 75235 2750 BURBANK ST ROARING FORK 70 LLC MIAMI BEACH, FL 33140 3103 N BAY RD SANDELL LINDA JO SAINT LOUIS, MO 63108 4624 PERSHING PL SCHONWALD ALEXANDER REV TRUST CLAYTON, MO 63105 PO BOX 50257 SCHRAGER TERRI L OMAHA, NE 68127 4405 S 96TH ST SCHULTZ BRIAN & ELIZABETH DALLAS, TX 75220 9301 MEADOWBROOK DR SEGUIN MARILYN A REV TRUST ASPEN, CO 81611 1001 E COOPER AVE #7 SEGUIN WILLIAM L REV TRUST ASPEN, CO 81611 1001 E COOPER AVE #7 SEID MELVIN C REV TRUST ASPEN, CO 81611 1104 DALE AVE SEIKE KYLE ENGLEWOOD, CO 80113 3971 S HUDSON WY SILVER GLEN TOWNHOUSES CONDO ASSOC ASPEN, CO 81611 COMMON AREA E HYMAN AVE SILVERSTREAM TOWNHOMES CONDO ASSOC ASPEN, CO 81612 PO BOX 49 SJC COOPER LLC SINGAPORE, 237990 6 MARTIN PLACE #29-09 MARTIN PLACE RESIDENCES SMILIOS PENNY WHITE & BASIL ASPEN, CO 81611 1007 E HYMAN AVE #2 SMITH MICHAEL B & TIFFANY S HOUSTON, TX 77057 6134 WILLERS WAY STEEL JOAN E TRUST CHICAGO, IL 60611-6690 161 E CHICAGO AVE #60N4 STOVER RAYMOND J H JR & MARY L ASPEN, CO 81611-2708 1006 E COOPER AVE SUNRISE CONDO ASSOC ASPEN, CO 81611 1007 E HYMAN AVE SUSI MARILEE E REV TRUST BOCA RATON, FL 33496 7806 CHARNEY LN SUSKIND DON LIV TRUST ASPEN, CO 81611 625 E MAIN ST #102B-228 SWANN LAURA M LIV TRUST LITTLETON, CO 80122 7009 S FILLMORE CT SWANN RUSSELL PRESLEY LIV TRUST LITTLETON, CO 80122 7009 S FILLMORE CT SYLVESTER JAMES W POUGHKEEPSIE, NY 12603 758 FREEDOM PLAINS RD TACHE MARK C ASPEN, CO 81611 1001 E HYMAN TAT TRUST ASPEN, CO 81612 PO BOX 7813 TCDC HOLDINGS INC KANSAS CITY, MO 64108 2345 GRAND BLVD #2400 TEN SIXTEEN EAST HYMAN SPEN, CO 81611 COMMON AREA 1016 E HYMAN AVE TENG NANCY H TRUST ELMHURST, IL 60126 1050 S EUCLID AVE #5108 THREE BEES LLC BAY SHORE, NY 11706 103 HARBOUR LN TRT OF COLORADO LLC TUSCALOOSA, AL 35406 7200 COMMODORE DR NE TWO PANTHER LLC DENVER, CO 80250 PO BOX 101358 TYE MARK M TRUST ASPEN, CO 81612 PO BOX 8992 UTE 202 LLC TAMARAC, FL 33321 7457 GRANVILLE DR #301 UTE CONDO ASSOC ASPEN, CO 81611 1020 E DURANT AVE VAN DEUSEN CONDO ASSOC ASPEN, CO 81611 COMMON AREA 1006 E HYMAN AVE VANHEES JOANNE G & ARNOLD NEW YORK, NY 10014 95 HORATIO ST #9K VGCT VENTURES LLC ATLANTA, GA 30305 8 CHEROKEE RD NW VILLAGER 3 LLC ASPEN, CO 81611 625 E HYMAN #201 VILLAGER TOWNHOUSE CONDO ASSOC ASPEN, CO 81611 1001 E COOPER AVE VINCENTI CONDO ASSOC ASPEN, CO 81611 1015 E HYMAN AVE WARING ASPEN LLC NEW ORLEANS, LA 70118 146 HENRY CLAY AVE WEAVER WENDY WILLMANN ASPEN, CO 81612 PO BOX 2477 WEISS BERNIE ASPEN, CO 81611 625 E MAIN ST 102B #211 WEISS LYNN ASPEN, CO 816111935 625 E MAIN ST #102B WEST POND DRIVE LLC NEW YORK, NY 10021 755 PARK AVE #5B WHITAKER-TOWNSEND KERRY KEY LARGO, FL 33037 37 PUMPKIN CAY RD #B WHITE JALEH REV TRUST ASPEN, CO 816112053 960 E DURANT AVE #7 WICKAM BRENTON MANNING TRUST SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94105-6655 301 MISSION ST #42A WILLIAMS CRAIG & LEE FAMILY PARTNERSHIP LTD SEA ISLAND, GA 31561 1704 SEA ISLAND DR WISE PEGGY S QPRT WINNETKA, IL 60093 1401 TOWER RD WOOD JEFFREY R & SHANA B HOUSTON, TX 77056 4900 WOODWAY DR #880 WUSLICH DIANE S ASPEN, CO 81611 1007 E HYMAN AVE #8 YPSI ANN ASSOCIATES BLOOMFIELD HILLS, MI 48304 39577 WOODWARD AVE #300 XGAS X G A S XGASXGASXGASXGASXGASXGASXTVXTVXTVXTVXTVXTVXTVXTVXTVXTVXTVXTVXTVXTVXTVXTVXTVXTVXTVXTVXTVXTVXTVXTVXTVXTVXTVXUTXUTXUTXUTXUTXUTXUTXUTXUTXUTXUTXUTXUTXUTXUTXUTXUTXUTXUTXUTXUTXUTXUTXUTXUTXUTXUTXUTXUTXUTXUTXUTXUTXUT XUT XUT XUT XUT XUT XU T XUT XUT XUT XUT XWLXWLXWLXWLXWLXWLXWLXWLXWLXWLXWLXWLXWLXWLXWLXWLXWLXWLXWLXWLXWLXELXELXELXELXELXELXEL XEL XEL XELXELXELXELXELXELXELXELXELXELXELxxxxxxxxxxxxx x x x x x x XGASXGASXGASXGASXGASXGASXGASXGASXGASXGASXGASXGASXGASXGASXGAS5'STBK 5'STBK 5'STBK 5'STBK 5'STBK 5'STBK 5'STBK 5'STBK 5'STBK 5'STBK 5'STBK 5'STBK 5'STBK 5'STBK 10'STBK10'STBK10'STBK10'STBK10'STBK15'STBK15'STBK15'STBK15'STBK15'STBK5'STBK5'STBK5'STBK5'STBK5'STBK5'STBK5'STBK5'STBK5'STBK5'STBK5'STBK5'STBK5'STBK5'STBK10'STBK10'STBK10'STBK10'STBK10'STBK5'STBK5'STBK5'STBK5'STBK5'STBKXSA XSA XSA XSA XSA XSA XSA XSA XSA XSA XSA XSAUELU E L UEL UEL UEL UEL WLSVCsasvc>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>sa svc sa svc sa svc sa svc sa svc sa svc TELTVTVTVTC: 44.19 TC: 44.25 ME: 44.8'± ME: 44.7'± ME: 45.5'± TC: 44.45 FG:7945.78' FG: 45.78 FG: 45.68 FG: 45.68 FG: 45.78 FG: 45.66FG: 45.68 FG: 45.10 TC: 44.52 TC: 44.48 ME: 44.0'±ME: 44.1'± TC: 44.29 TC: 44.37TC: 44.13TC: 43.87TC: 43.75TC: 43.62 FG: 43.73 FG: 43.73 TC: 43.66 TC: 44.15 FG: 44.00 FG: 43.93 FG: 44.42 FG: 44.12 FG:7943.28' FG: 43.28 FG: 44.46 TC: 43.21 TC: 44.28 TC: 43.25 FG: 43.66 TC: 43.60 TC: 43.62 FG: 43.10 FG: 43.10 RIM: 42.62 TC: 43.56 TC: 43.89 FG: 44.17 EX:7945.0'±EX:7945.0'± RIM: 45.00 ME: 44.1'±FG: 43.87 FG: 43.36 FG:7944.00' TC: 43.88 TC: 43.94 TC: 43.83 RIM: 43.854.9%2.0%5.0%2.0%3.0%SUBJECT PROPERTY PARCEL #273718232006 1020 E COOPER AVE RIVERSIDE CONDO ASSOC PARCEL #273718127801 1024 E COOPER AVE (NOT PART OF PROJECT) COOPER AVE VICTORIAN CONDO ASSOC PARCEL #273718232802 1012 E COOPER AVE (NOT PART OF PROJECT) PROPOSED 2" ASPHALT OVERLAY (12" MIN WIDTH)E. COOPER AVE.DOWN10.5' 3.0' 3.1' 3.0'3.0' 5.0' 4.0' 20.0'ALLEY 73.7' RIGHT OF WAY TC: 42.81TBC: 43.311.0%4.2%4.2% TC: 43.68 TC: 43.56 TBC: 44.42 TBC: 44.29TBC: 44.12TBC: 44.06 TC: 44.34 1.0%10.0' 10.6' FG: 44.81 TC: 44.15 ME: 44.2'± TBC: 44.87 TC: 44.41 TBC: 44.37 4.0% FG: 45.12 FG: 44.60 TC: 44.50 2.0% 32.7% 34.0% 36.8% 38.4% 42.7% TC: 44.79FL @ HP: 45.23 RIM: 44.37 5.0' FFE: 7943.34 (ARCH 97'-6 34")FFE: 7944.09 (ARCH 98'-3 34") FFE: 7945.84 (ARCH 100'-34") FL: 44.21 RIM: 44.50 TW: 45.72TW: 45.72 TW: 45.72 TC: 42.92 ME: 42.7'± FL: 42.66 1.7%8.4%4.8%TC: 43.04 EGRESS FL @ HP: 45.07 2.0%3.0%1.5%3.8%TRENCH DRAIN RIM: 44.13RIM: 44.11 TC: 44.10 TC: 43.90 TC: 44.07 FL: 43.25 ME: 43.3'± ME: 43.0'± ME: 42.8'± TC: 42.86TBC: 43.36 ME: 42.0'±ME: 43.0'±ME: 43.0'±ME: 44.0'± DECK DECKPLANTER BEDPLANTER BEDPLANTER BEDPLANTER BED 2.0% TC: 44.46 9.7% FG: 43.32 3.6% ME: 42.9'± TC: 43.29 TC: 43.29 RIM: 44.21 ME: 45.2'± RIM: 43.39 TC: 44.16 PROJECT BENCHMARK FOUND #5 REBAR & RED PLASTICCAP PLS 33638 0.2' ABOVE GRADE ELEV=7946.3 REPLACE 50 L.F. EXISTING CURB ANDGUTTER TO MATCH EXISTING SIZE AND GRADES. PROTECT EXISTING TREE DURING CONSTRUCTION REPLACE EXISTING ASPHALT IN KIND PROPERTY LINE PROPOSED FULL DEPTH SAWCUT STAIRSDOWN 6" CURB ALONG EDGE OF WALKWAY. EXTERIOR CLOSET TO AVOID IMPACTS TO EXISTING TREESTORM PIPE SHALL BE ROUTEDROUTED BELOW SLAB ON GRADE PROPOSED SCHEMATIC STORMPIPE LAYOUT. MATERIAL, SIZE, SLOPE & ALIGNMENT TO BEFINALIZED IN SUPPORT OF FUTURE BUILDING PERMIT (TYP) 2-FT WIDE CONCRETEDRAIN PAN REPLACED ELECTRIC VAULT & TRANSFORMER. VAULT LID SET 6" ABOVE FINAL/EXISTING GRADES REPLACE EXISTING SIDEWALK ADJOININGSUBJECT PROPERTY REPLACE EXISTING CURB & GUTTER IN FRONT OFSUBJECT PROPERTY AREA DRAIN OR SLOT DRAIN AT ENTRANCE & ROUTED THROUGH STRUCTURE TO DRY WELL (AREA LOCATED ABOVE STRUCTURE; BY OTHERS) EGRESS WELL (TYP) EGRESS WELL (TYP) OPRIS ES NGINEERING, LLC. CIVIL CONSULTANTS JOB NO. DATE: 502 MAIN STREET CARBONDALE, CO 81623 (970) 704-0311 FAX: (970)-704-0313 DATE REVISION C-1.0 DRAWING NO. TITLE G:\2022\32149-1020 E COOPER AVENUE\CIVIL\CIVIL DWGS\PLOT\C1.0-G&D PLAN.DWG - Sep 15, 2022 - 2:59pmDRAINAGE DIRECTION/SLOPE SPOT ELEVATION EXAMPLE: TOP OF CONCRETE @ 7945.00' = BOW = BOTTOM OF WALLEOA = EDGE OF ASPHALT EX = EXISTING GRADE FFE = FINISHED FLOOR ELEVATIONFG = FINISHED GRADE FL = FLOW LINEHP = HIGH POINTLP = LOW POINT MATCH EX = MATCH EXISTING RIM = RIM ELEVATIONTBC = TOP BACK OF CURBTOC = TOP OF CONCRETE SCHEMATIC GRADING & DRAINAGE PLANBASIS OF ELEVATION: THE 1998 CITY OF ASPEN DREXEL BARREL CONTROL DATUM, WHICH IS BASED ON AN ELEVATION OF 7720.88' (NAVD 1998) ON THE NGS STATION "S-159". THIS ESTABLISHED A SITE BENCHMARK LOCATED AT THE SOUTHWEST PROPERTY CORNER. LS# 33638, ELEV: 7946.3' PER SURVEY PREPARED BY SOPRIS ENGINEERING INC. SPOT ELEVATION LEGEND SITE BENCHMARK MEMBER UTILITIESFOR THE MARKING OF UNDERGROUNDBEFORE YOU DIG, GRADE, OR EXCAVATECALL 2-BUSINESS DAYS IN ADVANCE Know what's below.before you dig.Call RNORTH1 inch = ft. ( IN FEET ) GRAPHIC SCALE 05 5 10 5 202.5 PROPOSED DRAINAGE DRY-WELL PROPOSED SEWER MANHOLE PROPOSED WATER VALVE PROPOSED CURB STOP PROPOSED GAS METER/VALVE PROPOSED ELECTRIC TRANSFORMER PROPOSED SEWER CLEANOUT PROPOSED STORM INLET PROPOSED 8" WATER MAIN8'' WL PROPOSED 8" SANITARY SEWER MAIN PROPOSED TELEPHONE PROPOSED UNDERGROUND ELECTRIC PROPOSED CABLE PROPOSED STORM SEWER TEL TEL UE TV TV 8'' SA EXISTING FIRE HYDRANT EXISTING WATER VALVE EXISTING CURB STOP EXISTING GAS METER EXISTING ELECTRIC TRANSFORMER EXISTING TELEPHONE PEDESTAL EXISTING CATV PEDESTAL EXISTING SEWER CLEANOUT EXISTING 8" WATER MAINXWLXWL EXISTING 8" SANITARY SEWER MAIN EXISTING GAS EXISTING TELEPHONE XGAS XGAS EXISTING UNDERGROUND ELECTRIC EXISTING CABLE XUT XUT XEL XEL XTV XTV EXISTING IRRIGATION PIPEXIRRXIRR XSA XSA 32149 09-16-2022 SCHEMATIC DESIGN1020 E. COOPER AVENUEASPEN, COLORADOFINAL HPC APPROVALPROPOSED SAWCUT PROPOSED FULL DEPTH ASPHALT PROPOSED 2" ASPHALT OVERLAY PROPOSED CONCRETE PROPOSED LEGEND UTILITY LEGEND VICINITY MAP SITE SCALE: 1" = 1,000'NORTHXX: XX.XX 2.0% FG: 45.00 NOTE: THESE PLANS ARE CONCEPTUAL OR ILLUSTRATIVE IN NATURE. PRECISE INFORMATION SHALL BE PROVIDED AS PART OF THE BUILDING PERMIT APPLICATION, AND IN SITUATIONS WHERE THE FINAL HPC APPROVAL PLANS AND APPROVED BUILDING PERMIT DIFFER, THE APPROVED BUILDING PERMIT SHALL RULE. PROPOSED GRAVEL PROPOSED PORCH PROPOSED PLANTING BED PROPOSED LAWN AREA DESIGNED BY DRAWN BY CHECKED BY LRJ 09/12/22 LRJ 09/12/22 JKS 09/15/22 UELU E L UEL UEL UEL UEL WLSVCsasvc>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>sa svc sa svc sa svc sa svc sa svc sa svc TELTVTVTVXGAS XG A S XGASXGASXGASXGASXGASXGASXTVXTVXTVXTVXTVXTVXTVXTVXTVXTVXTVXTVXTVXTVXTVXTVXTVXTVXTVXTVXTVXTVXTVXTVXTVXTVXTVXTVXTVXTVXTVXTVXTVXTVXTVXTVXTVXTVXTVXTVXTVXTVXTVXTVXTVXTVXTVXTVXTVXTVXTVXTVXTVXUTXUTXUTXUTXUTXUTXUTXUTXUTXUTXUTXUTXUTXUTXUTXUTXUTXUTXUTXUTXUTXUTXUTXUTXUTXUTXUTXUTXUTXUTXUTXUTXUTXUTXUTXUTXUT XUT XUT XUT XUT XUT XU T XUT XUT XUT XUT XWLXWLXWLXWLXWLXWLXWLXWLXWLXWLXWLXWLXWLXWLXWLXWLXWLXWLXWLXWLXWLXELXELXELXELXELXELXELXELXELXELXELXELXELXELXELXELXELXELXELXELXELXELXELXEL XEL XEL XEL XELXELXELXELXELXELXELXELXELXELXELxxxxxxxxxxxxx x x x x x xXGASXGASXGASXGASXGASXGASXGASXGASXGASXGASXGASXGASXGAS XGASXGASXGASXGASXGASXGASXGASXGASXGASXGASXGASXGASXGASXGASXGASXGASXGASXGASXGASXGAS5'STBK 5'STBK 5'STBK 5'STBK 5'STBK 5'STBK 5'STBK 5'STBK 5'STBK 5'STBK 5'STBK 5'STBK 5'STBK 5'STBK 10'STBK10'STBK10'STBK10'STBK10'STBK15'STBK15'STBK15'STBK15'STBK15'STBK5'STBK5'STBK5'STBK5'STBK5'STBK5'STBK5'STBK5'STBK5'STBK5'STBK5'STBK5'STBK5'STBK5'STBK10'STBK10'STBK10'STBK10'STBK10'STBK5'STBK5'STBK5'STBK5'STBK5'STBKXSAXSAXSAXSAXSAXSAXSAXSAXSAXSAXSAXSAXSAXSAXSAXSAXSAXSA XSA XSA XSA XSA XSA XSA XSA XSA XSA XSA XSA EXISTING CABLE PEDESTAL EXISTING TRANSFORMER TO BEPROTECTED THROUGH ALL PHASES OF CONSTRUCTION EXISTING TELEPHONE PEDESTAL INSTALL (2) 4" PVC CONDUITS TO BUILDING FOR TELEPHONEAND CABLE SERVICEEXISTING UTILITY EASEMENT (10'X9.4') PER BK 98 PG 93 EXISTING ELEC. EASEMENT (2'X8") PER BK 126 PG 7 PROPOSEDAREA INLET PROPOSEDDRY WELL CONTRACTOR TO INSPECT EXISTING SEWER TAP & COORDINATE WITH ASPEN CONSOLIDATION SANITATION DISTRICT & ENGINEER OF RECORD ON WHETHER A NEW TAP WILL BE REQUIRED.EXTEND NEW SDR 26 SHARED SEWER SERVICE (SIZE TBD) TO PROJECT AND REMOVE/ABANDONEXISTING 4" VCP SHARED SERVICE AGREEMENTTO BE REQUESTED PRIOR TO BUILDING PERMIT APPLICATIONINV OF MAIN LINE=7937.3 INVERT OF SEWER SERVICE=7938.3 NEW SECONDARY ELECTRIC SERVICE (ESTIMATE: 600 AMP SERVICE. ACTUALELECTRIC DEMAND TO BE CONFIRMED PRIOR TO BUILDING PERMIT) PROPOSED 4' DIA. VAULT W/ 5'X5' LID CENTERED OVER EXISTING TRANSFORMER.INSTALL NEW TRANSFORMER NEW BOLLARDS @ EACHCORNER OF VAULT EXISTING BOLLARDS (TO BE REMOVED) EXISTING TRANSFORMERTO BE REPLACED EXISTING 3.5'X8'ELEC. EASEMENT CONTRACTOR TO ABANDON EXISTING UTILITY LINES SERVING THE SUBJECT PROPERTY (1020 E COOPER AVENUE)PROTECT EXISTING TREEDURING CONSTRUCTION PROPERTY LINE (TYP) SCHEMATIC STORM DRAIN LAYOUT FINAL SIZE, SLOPE & ALIGNMENT TOBE DETERMINED IN SUPPORT OF FUTURE BUILDING PERMIT (TYP) ACCESS HATCH TOCRAWLSPACE & WATER ENTRY ROOM (BY OTHERS) INSTALL AND EXTEND NEW WATER SERVICE PER COA WATER DEPARTMENT STANDARDS TOPROPOSED WATER ENTRY ROOM (FIRE FLOW CALCULATIONS TO BEPROVIDED IN SUPPORT OF FUTURE BUILDING PERMIT) EXISTING 14" WATER MAINLOCATION AND SIZE OF WATER TAP TO BE CONFIRMED PRIOR TO BUILDING PERMIT; (NOTE: ALL UTILITY WORK WITHIN CDOT'SROW SHALL BE PERFORMED UNDER AN APPROVED CDOT SPECIAL USE PERMIT) EXISTING WATER SERVICE TO BE ABANDONED AT THE MAIN PER COA WATER DEPARTMENT STANDARDS. CONTRACTOR TO UTILIZE AMANHOLE TRENCH BOX FOR ABANDONMENT TOLIMIT OVERALL DISTURBANCE. ALL UTILITY WORK WITHIN CDOT'S ROW SHALL BE PERFORMEDUNDER AN APPROVED CDOT SPECIAL USE PERMIT. NEW CABLE SERVICE LINE EXTENDED FROM EXISTING CABLE PEDESTALPER COMCAST STANDARDS NEW TELEPHONE SERVICE PULLEDFROM EXISTING PEDESTAL PERCENTURY LINK STANDARDS PROPOSED GRAVITY SEWERSERVICE TO EJECTOR PUMPFOR LOWER LEVEL PROPOSED SEWER EJECTOR PIT DESIGNED BY MEP IN SUPPORT OFFUTURE BUILDING PERMIT APPLICATION PROPOSED 33 L.F. GRAVITY SDR 26 SEWER SERVICE AT 2% MINIMUM SLOPE (SIZE TO BE DETERMINED PRIOR TO BUILDING PERMIT)INVERT AT CLEANOUT=7939.0 INSTALL 2-WAY CLEANOUT W/ FRAME & GRATE PROPOSED LOCATION OF ELECTRIC METERS & DISTRIBUTION PANEL CONNECT SEWER EJECTOR LINE TO GRAVITY SEWER SERVICE ENTRY PORCH W/ WATER ENTRY ROOMLOCATED BELOW WITHIN CRAWLSPACE3.5 8.0 PROPOSED DRAINAGE DRY-WELL PROPOSED SEWER MANHOLE PROPOSED WATER VALVE PROPOSED ELECTRIC TRANSFORMER PROPOSED SEWER CLEANOUT PROPOSED STORM INLET PROPOSED 8" WATER MAIN8'' WL PROPOSED 8" SANITARY SEWER MAIN PROPOSED TELEPHONE PROPOSED UNDERGROUND ELECTRIC PROPOSED CABLE PROPOSED STORM SEWER TEL TEL UE TV TV 8'' SA EXISTING WATER VALVE EXISTING ELECTRIC TRANSFORMER EXISTING TELEPHONE PEDESTAL EXISTING CATV PEDESTAL EXISTING WATER MAINXWLXWL EXISTING 8" SANITARY SEWER MAIN EXISTING GAS EXISTING TELEPHONE XGAS XGAS EXISTING UNDERGROUND ELECTRIC EXISTING CABLE XUT XUT XEL XEL XTV XTV EXISTING IRRIGATION PIPEXIRRXIRR XSA XSA OPRIS ES NGINEERING, LLC. CIVIL CONSULTANTS JOB NO. DATE: 502 MAIN STREET CARBONDALE, CO 81623 (970) 704-0311 FAX: (970)-704-0313 DESIGNED BY DRAWN BY CHECKED BY DATE REVISION DRAWING NO. TITLE G:\2022\32149-1020 E COOPER AVENUE\CIVIL\CIVIL DWGS\PLOT\C2.0-UTILITY PLAN.DWG - Sep 15, 2022 - 3:00pmNORTH1 inch = ft. ( IN FEET ) GRAPHIC SCALE 05 5 10 5 202.5 UTILITY PLAN LEGEND MEMBER UTILITIESFOR THE MARKING OF UNDERGROUNDBEFORE YOU DIG, GRADE, OR EXCAVATECALL 2-BUSINESS DAYS IN ADVANCE Know what's below.before you dig.Call R 1. ALL MINIMUM DEPTHS, SEPARATION DISTANCES, MATERIALS AND/OR USE OF CONDUIT SHALL BE CONFIRMED AND COORDINATED WITH THE UTILITY PROVIDER PER UTILITY AGREEMENTS. 2. ALL UTILITY LINES AND/OR CONDUITS TO BE BACKFILLED WITH SUITABLE MATERIAL FREE OF ROCKS >1 1/2" Ø. USE CLASS 6 AGGREGATE BASE MATERIAL FOR BEDDING, AND/OR SUITABLE ONSITE MATERIAL. INSTALL PER UTILITY PROVIDER SPECIFICATIONS. BACKFILL TRENCHES WITH SUITABLE ONSITE MATERIALS. MINIMUM COMPACTION 95% IN PAVED AREAS. 3. ALL HORIZONTAL AND VERTICAL UTILITY SEPARATIONS SHALL BE IN ACCORDANCE WITH CITY OF ASPEN DESIGN STANDARDS. 1. CONTRACTOR TO COORDINATE ABANDONMENT, RELOCATION, AND BURIAL OF THE EXISTING UTILITIES WITH THE UTILITY PROVIDERS PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION. 2. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL CONTAIN HIS CONSTRUCTION OPERATIONS WITHIN THE LIMITS OF CONSTRUCTION. CONTRACTOR SHALL NOT OPERATE OUTSIDE THIS AREA WITHOUT THE PRIOR CONSENT OF THE PROPERTY OWNER(S) INVOLVED. 3. THE LOCATIONS OF UNDERGROUND UTILITIES HAVE BEEN PLOTTED BASED ON UTILITY MAPS, LOCATES OR OTHER INFORMATION PROVIDED BY UTILITY COMPANIES AND ACTUAL FIELD LOCATIONS IN SOME INSTANCES. THESE UTILITIES, AS SHOWN MAY NOT REPRESENT ACTUAL FIELD CONDITIONS. IT IS THE RESPONSIBILITY OF THE CONTRACTOR TO CONTACT ALL UTILITY COMPANIES FOR FIELD LOCATION OF UTILITIES PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION. 4. ALL UTILITIES, BOTH UNDERGROUND AND OVERHEAD, SHALL BE MAINTAINED IN CONTINUOUS SERVICE THROUGHOUT THE ENTIRE CONSTRUCTION PERIOD. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE AND LIABLE FOR ANY DAMAGES TO, OR INTERRUPTION OF, SERVICES CAUSED BY THE CONSTRUCTION. 5. ALL SITE AND UTILITY WORK SHALL BE IN COMPLIANCE WITH CITY OF ASPEN RULES & REGULATIONS. A PRE-CONSTRUCTION MEETING IS REQUIRED PRIOR TO COMMENCEMENT OF WORK. 6. EXISTING CONDITIONS SURVEY PROVIDED BY SOPRIS ENGINEERING, LLC. 7. CONTRACTOR SHALL PROTECT ALL EXISTING TREES THAT ARE TO REMAIN. A TREE PROTECTION PLAN MUST BE APPROVED BY CITY PARKS DEPARTMENT AND LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT PRIOR TO COMMENCING CONSTRUCTION. 8. ALL UTILITY METER LOCATIONS SHOWN FOR REFERENCE. REFER TO MEP PLANS FOR FURTHER INFORMATION GENERAL UTILITY NOTES: SHALLOW UTILITY NOTES: NOTE: THESE PLANS ARE CONCEPTUAL OR ILLUSTRATIVE IN NATURE. PRECISE INFORMATION SHALL BE PROVIDED AS PART OF THE BUILDING PERMIT APPLICATION, AND IN SITUATIONS WHERE THE FINAL HPC APPROVAL PLANS AND APPROVED BUILDING PERMIT DIFFER, THE APPROVED BUILDING PERMIT SHALL RULE. PROPOSED SAWCUT PROPOSED FULL DEPTH ASPHALT PROPOSED 2" ASPHALT OVERLAY PROPOSED LEGEND PROPOSED GRAVEL PROPOSED PLANTING BED PROPOSED LAWN AREA REDUCED FORATTACHMENT TO REPORT JOB NO. DATE: C-2.0 SCHEMATIC UTILITY PLAN 32149 09-16-2022 SCHEMATIC DESIGN1020 E. COOPER AVENUEASPEN, COLORADOFINAL HPC APPROVALLRJ 09/12/22 LRJ 09/12/22 JKS 09/15/22 RIVERSIDE CONDO ASSOC PARCEL #273718127801 1024 E COOPER AVE (NOT PART OF PROJECT) COOPER AVE VICTORIAN CONDO ASSOC PARCEL #273718232802 1012 E COOPER AVE (NOT PART OF PROJECT) E. COOPER AVE. PROPOSED AFFORDABLE HOUSING DEVELOPMENT TOTAL PROPOSED IMPERVIOUS AREA: 3,640 SF TOTAL SITE IMPERVIOUS: 83% CONCRETE PATIO 1020 E COOPER 1024 E COOPERUELUEL >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>sasvcsasvcsasvcTV APPROXIMATE LIMITS OF ROOF OVERHANG APPROXIMATE LOCATION OF WATER QUALITY DRYWELL.NOTE: DRYWELL TO BE LOCATED10' FROM PRIVATE PROPERTY LINE AND STRUCTURES PROPOSED BURIED STORMWATERCONVEYANCE PIPE, TYP. PROPOSED BURIED STORMWATERCONVEYANCE PIPE, TYP. PROPOSED BURIED STORMWATER CONVEYANCE PIPE, TYP. PROPOSED CONCRETE WALKWAY. PROPOSED VALLEY INLET. ADDITIONALLY SERVES ASDRYWELL OVERFLOW POINT PROPOSED CONCRETE DRAIN PAN. PROPOSED TRENCH DRAIN PROPOSED AREA INLET PROPOSED AREA INLET PROPOSED AREA INLET PROPOSED AREA INLET PROPOSED AREA INLET EXISTING SINGLE STORY RESIDENCE TOTAL EXISTING SITE IMPERVIOUSAREA: 1,945 SF ± EXISTING SITE IMPERVIOUS: 45% OS-1 OS-2 OS-3 RIVERSIDE CONDO ASSOCCOOPER AVE VICTORIAN CONDO ASSOC CHATEAU EAU CLAIRE OS-4 EXISTING INLET AT LOW POINT EXISTING INLET AT LOW POINT EAST COOPER STREET OPRIS ES NGINEERING, LLC. CIVIL CONSULTANTS JOB NO. DATE: 502 MAIN STREET CARBONDALE, CO 81623 (970) 704-0311 FAX: (970)-704-0313 DESIGNED BY DRAWN BY CHECKED BY DATE REVISION DRAWING NO. TITLE G:\2022\32149-1020 E COOPER AVENUE\CIVIL\CIVIL DWGS\PLOT\C3.0-DRN PLAN.DWG - Sep 15, 2022 - 1:15pmMEMBER UTILITIESFOR THE MARKING OF UNDERGROUNDBEFORE YOU DIG, GRADE, OR EXCAVATECALL 2-BUSINESS DAYS IN ADVANCE Know what's below.before you dig.Call RNORTH 1 inch = ft. ( IN FEET ) GRAPHIC SCALE 020 20 40 20 8010 NOTE: THESE PLANS ARE CONCEPTUAL OR ILLUSTRATIVE IN NATURE. PRECISE INFORMATION SHALL BE PROVIDED AS PART OF THE BUILDING PERMIT APPLICATION, AND IN SITUATIONS WHERE THE FINAL HPC APPROVAL PLANS AND APPROVED BUILDING PERMIT DIFFER, THE APPROVED BUILDING PERMIT SHALL RULE.NORTH1 inch = ft. ( IN FEET ) GRAPHIC SCALE 05 5 10 5 202.5 EXISTING CONDITIONS POST DEVELOPMENT CONDITIONS POST DEVELOPMENT DRAINAGE BASIN LEGEND EXISTING DRAINAGE BASIN DRAINAGE FLOW ARROW EXISTING CONTOUR EXISTING CONTOUR INTERVAL7900 PROPOSED CONTOUR PROPOSED CONTOUR INTERVAL7900 EXISTING GIS CONTOUR C-3.0 SCHEMATIC DRAINAGE MITIGATION PLAN 32149 09-16-2022 SCHEMATIC DESIGN1020 E. COOPER AVENUEASPEN, COLORADOFINAL HPC APPROVALLRJ 09/12/22 LRJ 09/12/22 JKS 09/15/22 1020 E Cooper Street- Engineering Letter HPC Application September 16, 2022 502 Main Street • Suite A3 • Carbondale, CO 81623 • (970)704-0311• Fax (970)704-0313 S OPRIS E NGINEERING • LLC civil consultants DJ Architects c/o Brian Beazley 119 S. Spring Street, Ste 203 Aspen, CO 81611 brian@djarchitects.com RE: 1020 E Cooper Street-Final HPC Civil Engineering Report Sopris Engineering, LLC Job No. 32149 Dear Brian, Sopris Engineering, LLC (SE) has prepared this letter to summarize the Civil Engineering requirements and recommendations in support of the potential redevelopment of 1020 E. Cooper Street located in Aspen, CO. It is our understanding that the project is seeking final approval from HPC in support of an affordable housing project on the subject property. This letter is specific to utility extensions, conceptual site grading and stormwater mitigation options for the project team to further evaluate as the design progresses towards Building Permit Application. This letter has been slightly amended from the previously submitted letter dated October 15, 2020 provided for Conceptual HPC review. A schematic set of civil plans are provided as an attachment for illustrative support of this document. Background & Existing Conditions The subject property is located at 1020 E. Cooper Street in Aspen, CO (Parcel ID#273718232006) and according to Pitkin County Assessor’s webpage the existing building was constructed in 1888 with an effective year built of 1964 and was originally constructed as a single-family residence. Based on our review of the existing conditions survey and site visit the property consists of an existing single story wood frame house with a building footprint at ground elevation of approximately 1,100 sf. Existing ground cover includes gravel parking along the north side of the property, various concrete walkways, and intermittent lawn area/vegetation. Two detached shed structures front the alley to the north. The total impervious area has been estimated at 1,945+/- sf which includes the existing residence and out structures. Surface grades and existing drainage patterns generally slope from the southeast to the northwest across the site with relatively flat landscape grades around the residence. Existing gutters and a downspout appear to discharge directly to the adjacent ground. As such, tributary roof drainage appears to be conveyed over the existing ground toward the alley north of the subject property. No other stormwater improvements were observed during our site visit or indicated on the existing conditions survey. An existing electric and communications utility easement (Rec. # 659373) is located at the northeast corner of the property and accommodates portions of an existing 4’x4’ transformer vault as well as the COA Electric clearance requirements. Further discussion of the existing easement as it relates to this and future development can be found in the Site Utilities section of this letter. According to Figure 3.1 of the City’s Urban Runoff Management Plan (URMP) the underlying soils likely consist of Type B Soils which have moderate infiltration rates. This is consistent with the recent geotechnical borings that are described in Kumar + Associates soils report dated June 29 ,2021. A copy of this report is provided as attachment to this letter. The subject property falls within Zone X as identified on FEMA Flood Insurance Rate Map Panel #08097C0366E, effective date August 15, 2019. Zone X includes areas determined to be outside the 500-year flood plain. The subject property falls within Drainage System 1, Basin 12 as described within the City’s Surface Drainage Master Plan (SDMP), dated November 2001 prepared by WRC Engineering, Inc. Drainage System 1 currently consists of street curb and gutter, roadside ditches and a network of storm sewer pipes to include a 36” CMP storm collection pipe that runs north down Original Street. There is an existing 18” HDPE storm sewer beneath Cooper Street, directly south of the subject property. 1020 E Cooper Street- Engineering Letter HPC Application September 16, 2022 Page 2 5 02 Main Street • Suite A3 • Carbondale, CO 81623 • (970)704-0311• Fax (970)704-0313 S OPRIS E NGINEERING • LLC civil consultants Preliminary investigation of the City’s storm sewer collection system revealed the shallow depths prohibitive for direct connection of the development’s anticipated stormwater mitigation infrastructure. The existing site and adjacent sidewalk lie beneath the flowline elevation of the adjacent Cooper Street which is inconsistent with typical City Engineering Standards. Sopris Engineering studied the option of raising the sidewalk however this has implications to the neighboring properties and therefore site visits were performed to evaluate existing offsite tributary drainage basins to determine whether or not this existing condition has any adverse impacts to the subject property. Through this analysis SE determined a total of (4) four offsite basins that contribute offsite runoff to the development. The basins are further described below and supporting calculations are attached to this letter. Basin OS-1 is an existing basin within E Cooper Street directly south and east of the subject property. An existing at grade access to the Chateau Eu Claire and the associated northern edge of the E Cooper Street attached site walk serves as the northern boundary for the basin. An existing low point and associated inlet was observed just west of the E Cooper Street bridge crossing of the Roaring Fork River. As such, the eastern limits of the basin were established by the breakline tributary to this inlet. The southern extent of the basin was established at the crown of E Cooper Street. Overall imperviousness is estimated to be 100% impervious based on existing ground cover. Runoff generated within the basin is collected within a 4’ concrete drain pan associated with the Chateau Eau Clair access. Surface runoff then continues west within the concrete flowline into a formal curb and gutter system in front of the subject property (Basin OS-2). The drain pan was field measured to have an approximate 0.2’ available flow depth and approximately 1.5% longitudinal slope. Based on this information, the 100-year storm event is estimated to be fully contained within the drain pan at an approximate 0.14’ flow depth. This analysis concludes that no existing offsite runoff will be tributary to the site from the E Cooper Street right of way east of the subject property. Basin OS-2 is an existing basin within Cooper Street directly south of the subject property. The northern limit of the basin was established to be the top of curb on the north side of E Copper Street. The basin is bound by Basin OS-1 to the east and the projected subject property line to the west. The southern extent of the basin was established at the crown of Cooper Street. Overall imperviousness is estimated to be 100% impervious based on existing ground cover. Runoff generated within the basin is collected within an existing curb and gutter system on the north side of E Cooper Street. Surface runoff then continues west within the gutter flowline to a curb inlet west of the subject property, near the intersection with S Cleveland Street. Portions of the existing curb will be replaced with COA compliant curb & gutter with this project, however the existing curb height was measured for conservative analysis. The curb height was field measured to have an approximate 4.5” height, 2” gutter drop and 1.5% longitudinal slope. Based on this information, the 100-year storm event is estimated to be fully contained within existing parking lane at an approximate 0.13’ flow depth. This analysis concludes that runoff from the basin will not overtop the curb and no existing offsite runoff will be tributary to the site from the north side of E Cooper Street in front of the subject property. Basin OS-3 is an existing basin within Cooper Street detached sidewalk directly south of the subject property. The northern limit of the basin was established to be the northern edge of the sidewalk adjacent to the development. The basin is bound by Basin OS-1 to the east and the projected subject property line to the west. The southern extent of the basin was established at top back of curb on the north side of E Cooper Street. A small portion of existing sidewalk from the adjacent Riverside Condo property to the east was additionally included within the basin limits. Overall imperviousness is estimated to be 75% impervious based on existing ground cover. Runoff generated within the basin is conveyed to the south towards the landscape area and away from the subject property. Basin OS-4 is an existing basin comprised of the various properties south of E Cooper Street that may contribute surface runoff to the south side of E Cooper Street in front of the subject property. The northern extent of the basin was established to be the crown of E Cooper Street to verify if the tributary runoff would overtop the crown of the road. Overall 1020 E Cooper Street- Engineering Letter HPC Application September 16, 2022 Page 3 5 02 Main Street • Suite A3 • Carbondale, CO 81623 • (970)704-0311• Fax (970)704-0313 S OPRIS E NGINEERING • LLC civil consultants imperviousness is estimated to be 85% impervious based on existing ground cover and a conservative 5-minute time of concentration was evaluated. Runoff generated within the basin is collected within an existing curb and gutter system on the south side of E Cooper Street. Surface runoff then continues west within the gutter flowline to a curb inlet west of the subject property. The existing curb height was measured for conservative analysis. The curb height was field measured to have an approximate 5.5” height, 2” gutter drop and 1.5% longitudinal slope. Based on this information, the 100-year storm event is estimated to be fully contained within existing parking lane at an approximate 0.41’ flow depth. This analysis concludes that runoff from the basin will not overtop the crown of E Cooper Street and no existing offsite runoff will be tributary to the site from the south side of E Cooper Street. Table 1 – Existing Peak Runoff Values 10-yr 100-yr 10-yr 100-yr 10-yr 100-yr EX-1 0.101 44% 0.42 0.63 5.0 3.72 6.32 0.16 0.40 OS-1 0.076 100% 0.86 0.89 5.0 3.72 6.32 0.24 0.43 OS-2 0.032 100% 0.86 0.89 5.0 3.72 6.32 0.10 0.18 OS-3 0.013 75% 0.66 0.77 5.0 3.72 6.32 0.03 0.06 OS-4 0.984 85% 0.74 0.82 5.0 3.72 6.32 2.71 5.10 Existing Drainage Basin: Rational Method Summary Subcatchment Name Area (ac) Percent Imperviousness Runoff Coefficient, C Selected tc (min) Rainfall Intensity,I(in/hr) Peak Flow, Q (cfs) Lastly, according to Figure 7.1a of the City’s URMP the subject property falls outside Aspen Mountain’s mudflow zone, however it should be noted that the City is in the process of updating mudflow studies and regulations which may influence any potential mudflow requirements for the subject property. Proposed Development, Stormwater Requirements and Stormwater Mitigation It is our understanding that the project will include a remodel of the existing residence and an expansion to accommodate multiple affordable housing units. Additional improvements include off-street parking along the north side of the property, various walkways, bicycle racks, trash enclosure, landscaping, stormwater mitigation infrastructure and utility service extensions. Based on the proposed improvements the project will be classified as a “Major Project” as identified within the City’s URMP. Based on the location of the subject property the stormwater mitigation requirements will include water quality treatment for all exposed impervious areas. Onsite stormwater detention is not required for the proposed improvements as conveyance of storm events that exceed the proposed dry well’s capacity will be routed to the City’s surface drainage system via surface flow west down the existing alley towards S. Cleveland Street’s curb/gutter consistent with the analysis provided in the City’s Surface Drainage Master Plan prepared by WRC Engineering. Water Quality Treatment: Based on the estimated total impervious area, the resulting required water quality treatment volume will be approximately 69 cf. Preliminary investigation for integrating permeable pavers, green roofs, disconnecting directly connected impervious areas has proven challenging given the nature of affordable housing development and the valuable real estate such BMPs occupy. However, the future implementation of such BMPs may be further evaluated as the project design progresses. Based on the existing site topography and proposed site development the most viable option for providing the required water quality treatment is a drywell. The geotechnical report dated June 29, 2021 states that a drywell is a suitable surface water disposal system. Dry Wells are a stormwater mitigation BMP that incorporates manhole structures with perforated barrels at the deeper depths. Washed screened rock is installed around the exterior of the perforated sections. When sub-soils are capable of moderate to high infiltration rates, dry wells are considered to be a viable BMP. They dramatically reduce the increased runoff and volume of stormwater generated from surrounding impervious areas and promote infiltration; thereby improving the 1020 E Cooper Street- Engineering Letter HPC Application September 16, 2022 Page 4 5 02 Main Street • Suite A3 • Carbondale, CO 81623 • (970)704-0311• Fax (970)704-0313 S OPRIS E NGINEERING • LLC civil consultants water quality of stormwater runoff. The required water quality capture volume for a dry well shall be 150% of the design water quality capture volume as outlined within Chapter 8 of the City’s URMP. Per the City’s URMP dry wells shall not be located within 10-ft of any structure or 10-ft from a property line. Based on these criteria there is only one potential location for a dry well as illustrated on the attached conceptual grade plan; unless a variance request is pursued. The resulting anticipated water quality capture volume based on the anticipated proposed impervious areas and a 1.5 factor of safety is therefore estimated to be 104 cf. There will be well in excess of 104 cf of available storage volume within the proposed drywell given the minimum depths required to meet Section 8.5.4.2 of the URMP. Site Utilities Coordination with the various utility providers has taken place to verify layouts, routing, and feasibility of serving the proposed improvements. This section of the letter describes our findings. Preliminary utility plans have been included within the attached civil drawings for illustrative support. Additional details and finalized design will be submitted when a Building Permit Application is pursued. Water Service & Fire Flow Analysis The City of Aspen Water Department is the provider of potable water for the subject property. Currently the site is served off the existing 14-inch DIP main that runs down Cooper Avenue. The existing service size is unknown but the service is to be capped and abandoned if determined to be inadequate to support the proposed improvements. A new service tap meeting the COA Water Department Standards will be provided if required. The water service is anticipated to be routed to a water entry room near the southeast corner of the site, beneath a proposed patio. The master meter will be located within a tempered space and entrance will be provided through an access hatch integrated within the patio in compliance with Section 5.8 of the Water Distribution Standards. A common service line agreement may be pursued by the development and will be provided in support of a future building permit application if necessary. Final size of the service line will be coordinated with the Water Department staff based on anticipated building program demands and fire sprinkler suppression requirements. Final fixture counts and resulting consumptive demands will be determined by the Mechanical Engineer and coordinated with City staff prior to pursuing a Building Permit Application. Tap connection fees will likely be required for the proposed redevelopment project. Sanitary Sewer Aspen Consolidated Sanitation District (ACSD) is the supplier of sanitary sewer service to the subject property and surrounding area. An existing 8” collector line exists in the alley to the north of the proposed building. There is an existing service from this line to the existing residence. This existing service will be evaluated as the design progresses and the final size of the service line will be determined by the project’s mechanical engineer in support of a future building permit application. A small injector system is likely required in order to lift below grade spaces up to the District’s system within the alley. The injector system is anticipated to be located exterior of the structure(s) and on the north side of the development. Additional tap fees are expected to be required as part of the redevelopment and will be due at the time of Building Permit issuance. Shallow Utilities The shallow utilities proposed to serve 1020 E Cooper Avenue include electric, cable, and telephone. Natural gas service is not anticipated at this time. The information provided within this section includes utility locates obtained during the improvement survey as well as discussions with the individual utility providers. City of Aspen Electric currently serves the subject property via a transformer located within an existing dedicated easement (Rec. # 659373) near the northeast corner of the subject property. The existing transformer and vault are primarily located on the adjacent property to the east, however a small portion of the transformer and vault lie within the City’s Right of Way. The size and location of the existing transformer was discussed and coordinated with City Engineering Staff. Relocating the existing transformer would require an additional splice vault within the alley. City Staff decided additional infrastructure was not desirable and determined a new 4-ft diameter vault is to be centered beneath the existing transformer. A new 5’x5’ transformer lid and upgraded transformer will be placed atop the vault. 1020 E Cooper Street- Engineering Letter HPC Application September 16, 2022 Page 5 5 02 Main Street • Suite A3 • Carbondale, CO 81623 • (970)704-0311• Fax (970)704-0313 S OPRIS E NGINEERING • LLC civil consultants The proposed infrastructure upgrade coordinated with City Staff fits within the existing easement and complies with COA Electric Standards for required clearances. Comcast Cable service is currently provided via a pedestal located on the property directly adjacent to the west. The upgraded service is proposed to come from this same pedestal and will follow a similar alignment to the existing line. Cable service is anticipated to be routed below grade directly to the development’s mechanical room and distributed internal to the development as necessary. Century Link Telephone service is currently provided via an existing pedestal located near the northwest corner of the property. New service to meet the development’s needs is anticipated to originate from current pedestal. Source Gas is not currently anticipated for the proposed development. There is an existing main within the alley should the development decide to pursue natural gas service as the design progresses. A Schematic Utility Plan has been included within the application (C-2.0) for illustrative support. A final plan is to be submitted when additional development approvals are pursued. Conclusion Based on our evaluation of the existing site conditions and proposed development the project has a viable option for providing water quality, stormwater detention and utility services available to serve the proposed improvements on the subject property. The design of all onsite stormwater mitigation infrastructure, water quality treatment facilities, and utility service extensions, to include size and location, will be further analyzed as the project design progresses. Final designs being provided with any future building permit application. If you have any questions or need any additional information, please don’t hesitate contacting our office. Sincerely, SOPRIS ENGINEERING, LLC Jesse K Swann, PE Project Manager Encl: Schematic Civil Plan Set Hydraflow Calculation Kumar + Associates Subsurface Exploration Letter dated June 29, 2021 XGASXGASXGASXGASXGASXGASXGASXGASXTV XTV XTV XTV XTV XTV XTV XTV XTV XTV XTV XTVXTVXTVXTVXTVXTV XTVXTVXTVXTVXTVXTVXTVXTVXTVXTVXUTXUTXUTXUTXUTXUTXUTXUTXUTXUTXUTXUTXUT XUT XUT XUT XUT XUT XUT XUT XUT XUT XUT XUT XUT XUT XUTXUTXUTXUTXUTXUTXUT XUTXUTXUTXUTXUTXUTXUTXUTXUTXUTXUTXWLXWLXWLXWLXWLXWLXWLXWLXWLXWLXWLXWLXWLXWLXWLXWLXWLXWLXWLXWLXWLXELXELXELXELXELXELXELXELXELXELXELXELXELXELXELXELXELXELXELXELxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxXGASXGASXGASXGASXGASXGASXGASXGASXGASXGASXGASXGASXGASXGASXGAS5'STBK5'STBK5'STBK5'STBK5'STBK5'STBK5'STBK5'STBK5'STBK5'STBK5'STBK5'STBK5'STBK5'STBK10'STBK10'STBK10'STBK10'STBK10'STBK15'STBK15'STBK15'STBK15'STBK15'STBK5'STBK5'STBK5'STBK5'STBK5'STBK5'STBK5'STBK5'STBK5'STBK5'STBK5'STBK5'STBK5'STBK5'STBK10'STBK 10'STBK 10'STBK 10'STBK 10'STBK5'STBK 5'STBK 5'STBK 5'STBK 5'STBKXSAXSAXSAXSAXSAXSAXSAXSAXSAXSAXSAXSA UELUELUELUELUELUELWLSVCsasvc >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>sasvcsasvcsasvcsasvcsasvcsasvcTELTVTVTV TC: 44.19TC: 44.25ME: 44.8'±ME: 44.7'±ME: 45.5'±TC: 44.45FG:7945.78'FG: 45.78FG: 45.68FG: 45.68FG: 45.78FG: 45.66FG: 45.68FG: 45.10TC: 44.52TC: 44.48ME: 44.0'±ME: 44.1'±TC: 44.29TC: 44.37TC: 44.13TC: 43.87TC: 43.75TC: 43.62FG: 43.73FG: 43.73TC: 43.66TC: 44.15FG: 44.00FG: 43.93FG: 44.42FG: 44.12FG:7943.28'FG: 43.28FG: 44.46TC: 43.21TC: 44.28TC: 43.25FG: 43.66TC: 43.60TC: 43.62FG: 43.10FG: 43.10RIM: 42.62TC: 43.56TC: 43.89FG: 44.17EX:7945.0'±EX:7945.0'±RIM: 45.00ME: 44.1'±FG: 43.87FG: 43.36FG:7944.00'TC: 43.88TC: 43.94TC: 43.83RIM: 43.854.9%2.0%5.0%2.0%3.0%SUBJECT PROPERTYPARCEL #2737182320061020 E COOPER AVERIVERSIDE CONDO ASSOCPARCEL #2737181278011024 E COOPER AVE(NOT PART OF PROJECT)COOPER AVE VICTORIAN CONDO ASSOCPARCEL #2737182328021012 E COOPER AVE(NOT PART OF PROJECT)PROPOSED 2"ASPHALT OVERLAY(12" MIN WIDTH)E. COOPER AVE. DOWN 10.5'3.0'3.1'3.0'3.0'5.0'4.0'20.0'ALLEY73.7'RIGHT OF WAYTC: 42.81TBC: 43.311.0%4.2%4.2%TC: 43.68TC: 43.56TBC: 44.42TBC: 44.29TBC: 44.12TBC: 44.06TC: 44.341.0%10.0'10.6'FG: 44.81TC: 44.15ME: 44.2'±TBC: 44.87TC: 44.41TBC: 44.374.0%FG: 45.12FG: 44.60TC: 44.502.0%32.7%34.0%36.8%38.4%42.7%TC: 44.79FL @ HP: 45.23RIM: 44.375.0'FFE: 7943.34(ARCH 97'-6 34")FFE: 7944.09(ARCH 98'-3 34")FFE: 7945.84(ARCH 100'-34")FL: 44.21RIM: 44.50TW: 45.72TW: 45.72TW: 45.72TC: 42.92ME: 42.7'±FL: 42.661.7%8.4%4.8%TC: 43.04EGRESSFL @ HP: 45.072.0%3.0% 1.5% 3.8%TRENCH DRAINRIM: 44.13RIM: 44.11TC: 44.10TC: 43.90TC: 44.07FL: 43.25ME: 43.3'±ME: 43.0'±ME: 42.8'±TC: 42.86TBC: 43.36ME: 42.0'±ME: 43.0'±ME: 43.0'±ME: 44.0'±DECKDECK PLANTER BEDPLANTER BEDPLANTER BED PLANTER BED2.0%TC: 44.469.7%FG: 43.323.6%ME: 42.9'±TC: 43.29TC: 43.29RIM: 44.21ME: 45.2'±RIM: 43.39TC: 44.16PROJECT BENCHMARKFOUND #5 REBAR & RED PLASTICCAP PLS 336380.2' ABOVE GRADEELEV=7946.3REPLACE 50 L.F.EXISTING CURB ANDGUTTER TO MATCHEXISTING SIZE ANDGRADES.PROTECT EXISTING TREEDURING CONSTRUCTIONREPLACE EXISTINGASPHALT IN KINDPROPERTY LINEPROPOSED FULLDEPTH SAWCUTSTAIRSDOWN6" CURB ALONG EDGEOF WALKWAY.EXTERIOR CLOSET TO AVOIDIMPACTS TO EXISTING TREESTORM PIPE SHALL BE ROUTEDROUTED BELOW SLAB ON GRADEPROPOSED SCHEMATIC STORMPIPE LAYOUT. MATERIAL, SIZE,SLOPE & ALIGNMENT TO BEFINALIZED IN SUPPORT OFFUTURE BUILDING PERMIT (TYP)2-FT WIDECONCRETEDRAIN PANREPLACED ELECTRICVAULT & TRANSFORMER.VAULT LID SET 6" ABOVEFINAL/EXISTING GRADESREPLACE EXISTINGSIDEWALK ADJOININGSUBJECT PROPERTYREPLACE EXISTING CURB& GUTTER IN FRONT OFSUBJECT PROPERTYAREA DRAIN OR SLOT DRAIN ATENTRANCE & ROUTED THROUGHSTRUCTURE TO DRY WELL (AREA LOCATEDABOVE STRUCTURE; BY OTHERS)EGRESS WELL (TYP)EGRESS WELL (TYP)OPRISESNGINEERING, LLC.CIVIL CONSULTANTSJOB NO.DATE:502 MAIN STREETCARBONDALE, CO 81623(970) 704-0311FAX: (970)-704-0313DATE REVISIONC-1.0DRAWING NO.TITLEG:\2022\32149-1020 E COOPER AVENUE\CIVIL\CIVIL DWGS\PLOT\C1.0-G&D PLAN.DWG - Sep 15, 2022 - 2:59pm DRAINAGE DIRECTION/SLOPESPOT ELEVATIONEXAMPLE: TOP OF CONCRETE @ 7945.00' =BOW = BOTTOM OF WALLEOA = EDGE OF ASPHALTEX = EXISTING GRADEFFE = FINISHED FLOOR ELEVATIONFG = FINISHED GRADEFL = FLOW LINEHP = HIGH POINTLP = LOW POINTMATCH EX = MATCH EXISTINGRIM = RIM ELEVATIONTBC = TOP BACK OF CURBTOC = TOP OF CONCRETESCHEMATICGRADING &DRAINAGE PLANBASIS OF ELEVATION: THE 1998 CITY OF ASPEN DREXEL BARRELCONTROL DATUM, WHICH IS BASED ON AN ELEVATION OF7720.88' (NAVD 1998) ON THE NGS STATION "S-159".THIS ESTABLISHED A SITE BENCHMARK LOCATED AT THESOUTHWEST PROPERTY CORNER. LS# 33638, ELEV: 7946.3' PERSURVEY PREPARED BY SOPRIS ENGINEERING INC.SPOT ELEVATION LEGENDSITE BENCHMARKMEMBER UTILITIESFOR THE MARKING OF UNDERGROUNDBEFORE YOU DIG, GRADE, OR EXCAVATECALL 2-BUSINESS DAYS IN ADVANCEKnow what'sbelow.before you dig.CallRNORTH1 inch = ft.( IN FEET )GRAPHIC SCALE055105202.5PROPOSED DRAINAGE DRY-WELLPROPOSED SEWER MANHOLEPROPOSED WATER VALVEPROPOSED CURB STOPPROPOSED GAS METER/VALVEPROPOSED ELECTRIC TRANSFORMERPROPOSED SEWER CLEANOUTPROPOSED STORM INLETPROPOSED 8" WATER MAIN8'' WLPROPOSED 8" SANITARY SEWER MAINPROPOSED TELEPHONEPROPOSED UNDERGROUND ELECTRICPROPOSED CABLEPROPOSED STORM SEWERTELTELUETVTV8'' SAEXISTING FIRE HYDRANTEXISTING WATER VALVEEXISTING CURB STOPEXISTING GAS METEREXISTING ELECTRIC TRANSFORMEREXISTING TELEPHONE PEDESTALEXISTING CATV PEDESTALEXISTING SEWER CLEANOUTEXISTING 8" WATER MAINXWLXWLEXISTING 8" SANITARY SEWER MAINEXISTING GASEXISTING TELEPHONEXGASXGASEXISTING UNDERGROUND ELECTRICEXISTING CABLEXUTXUTXELXELXTVXTVEXISTING IRRIGATION PIPEXIRRXIRRXSAXSA3214909-16-2022SCHEMATIC DESIGN 1020 E. COOPER AVENUE ASPEN, COLORADO FINAL HPC APPROVALPROPOSED SAWCUTPROPOSED FULL DEPTH ASPHALTPROPOSED 2" ASPHALT OVERLAYPROPOSED CONCRETEPROPOSED LEGENDUTILITY LEGENDVICINITY MAPSITESCALE: 1" = 1,000'NORTHXX: XX.XX2.0%FG: 45.00NOTE:THESE PLANS ARE CONCEPTUAL OR ILLUSTRATIVE IN NATURE. PRECISE INFORMATION SHALL BE PROVIDED ASPART OF THE BUILDING PERMIT APPLICATION, AND IN SITUATIONS WHERE THE FINAL HPC APPROVAL PLANSAND APPROVED BUILDING PERMIT DIFFER, THE APPROVED BUILDING PERMIT SHALL RULE.PROPOSED GRAVELPROPOSED PORCHPROPOSED PLANTING BEDPROPOSED LAWN AREADESIGNED BYDRAWN BYCHECKED BYLRJ09/12/22LRJ 09/12/22JKS 09/15/22 UELUELUELUELUELUELWLSVCsasvc>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>sasvcsasvcsasvcsasvcsasvcsasvcTELTVTVTV XGASXGASXGASXGASXGASXGASXGASXGASXTVXTVXTV XTV XTV XTV XTV XTV XTV XTV XTV XTV XTV XTV XTV XTV XTV XTV XTV XTV XTV XTV XTVXTVXTVXTVXTVXTVXTVXTVXTVXTVXTVXTVXTVXTVXTVXTVXTVXTVXTVXTVXTVXTVXTVXTVXTVXTVXTVXTVXTVXTVXTVXUTXUTXUTXUTXUTXUTXUTXUTXUTXUTXUTXUTXUTXUT XUT XUT XUT XUT XUT XUT XUT XUT XUT XUT XUT XUT XUT XUTXUTXUTXUTXUTXUTXUTXUTXUT XUTXUTXUTXUTXUTXUTXUTXUTXUTXUTXUTXWLXWLXWLXWLXWLXWLXWLXWLXWLXWLXWLXWLXWLXWLXWLXWLXWLXWLXWLXWLXWLXELXELXELXELXELXELXELXELXEL XEL XEL XEL XEL XEL XEL XEL XEL XEL XEL XEL XEL XEL XEL XELXELXELXELXELXELXELXELXELXELXELXELXELXELXELxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxXGASXGASXGASXGASXGASXGASXGASXGASXGASXGASXGASXGASXGASXGASXGASXGASXGASXGASXGASXGASXGASXGASXGASXGASXGASXGASXGASXGASXGASXGASXGASXGASXGAS5'STBK5'STBK5'STBK5'STBK5'STBK5'STBK5'STBK5'STBK5'STBK5'STBK5'STBK5'STBK5'STBK5'STBK10'STBK10'STBK10'STBK10'STBK10'STBK15'STBK15'STBK15'STBK15'STBK15'STBK5'STBK5'STBK5'STBK5'STBK5'STBK5'STBK5'STBK5'STBK5'STBK5'STBK5'STBK5'STBK5'STBK5'STBK10'STBK 10'STBK 10'STBK 10'STBK 10'STBK5'STBK 5'STBK 5'STBK 5'STBK 5'STBK XSAXSAXSAXSAXSAXSAXSAXSAXSAXSAXSAXSAXSAXSAXSAXSAXSAXSAXSAXSAXSAXSAXSAXSAXSAXSAXSAXSAXSAEXISTING CABLE PEDESTALEXISTING TRANSFORMER TO BEPROTECTED THROUGH ALLPHASES OF CONSTRUCTIONEXISTING TELEPHONE PEDESTALINSTALL (2) 4" PVC CONDUITSTO BUILDING FOR TELEPHONEAND CABLE SERVICEEXISTING UTILITY EASEMENT(10'X9.4') PER BK 98 PG 93EXISTING ELEC. EASEMENT(2'X8") PER BK 126 PG 7PROPOSEDAREA INLETPROPOSEDDRY WELLCONTRACTOR TO INSPECT EXISTING SEWER TAP& COORDINATE WITH ASPEN CONSOLIDATIONSANITATION DISTRICT & ENGINEER OF RECORDON WHETHER A NEW TAP WILL BE REQUIRED.EXTEND NEW SDR 26 SHARED SEWER SERVICE(SIZE TBD) TO PROJECT AND REMOVE/ABANDONEXISTING 4" VCP SHARED SERVICE AGREEMENTTO BE REQUESTED PRIOR TO BUILDING PERMITAPPLICATIONINV OF MAIN LINE=7937.3INVERT OF SEWER SERVICE=7938.3NEW SECONDARY ELECTRIC SERVICE(ESTIMATE: 600 AMP SERVICE. ACTUALELECTRIC DEMAND TO BE CONFIRMEDPRIOR TO BUILDING PERMIT)PROPOSED 4' DIA. VAULT W/ 5'X5' LIDCENTERED OVER EXISTING TRANSFORMER.INSTALL NEW TRANSFORMERNEW BOLLARDS @ EACHCORNER OF VAULTEXISTING BOLLARDS(TO BE REMOVED)EXISTING TRANSFORMERTO BE REPLACEDEXISTING 3.5'X8'ELEC. EASEMENTCONTRACTOR TO ABANDON EXISTINGUTILITY LINES SERVING THE SUBJECTPROPERTY (1020 E COOPER AVENUE)PROTECT EXISTING TREEDURING CONSTRUCTIONPROPERTY LINE (TYP)SCHEMATIC STORM DRAIN LAYOUTFINAL SIZE, SLOPE & ALIGNMENT TOBE DETERMINED IN SUPPORT OFFUTURE BUILDING PERMIT (TYP)ACCESS HATCH TOCRAWLSPACE & WATERENTRY ROOM (BY OTHERS)INSTALL AND EXTEND NEWWATER SERVICE PER COA WATERDEPARTMENT STANDARDS TOPROPOSED WATER ENTRY ROOM(FIRE FLOW CALCULATIONS TO BEPROVIDED IN SUPPORT OFFUTURE BUILDING PERMIT)EXISTING 14" WATER MAINLOCATION AND SIZE OF WATER TAP TO BECONFIRMED PRIOR TO BUILDING PERMIT;(NOTE: ALL UTILITY WORK WITHIN CDOT'SROW SHALL BE PERFORMED UNDER ANAPPROVED CDOT SPECIAL USE PERMIT)EXISTING WATER SERVICE TO BE ABANDONED ATTHE MAIN PER COA WATER DEPARTMENTSTANDARDS. CONTRACTOR TO UTILIZE AMANHOLE TRENCH BOX FOR ABANDONMENT TOLIMIT OVERALL DISTURBANCE. ALL UTILITY WORKWITHIN CDOT'S ROW SHALL BE PERFORMEDUNDER AN APPROVED CDOT SPECIAL USE PERMIT.NEW CABLE SERVICE LINE EXTENDEDFROM EXISTING CABLE PEDESTALPER COMCAST STANDARDSNEW TELEPHONE SERVICE PULLEDFROM EXISTING PEDESTAL PERCENTURY LINK STANDARDSPROPOSED GRAVITY SEWERSERVICE TO EJECTOR PUMPFOR LOWER LEVELPROPOSED SEWER EJECTOR PITDESIGNED BY MEP IN SUPPORT OFFUTURE BUILDING PERMIT APPLICATIONPROPOSED 33 L.F. GRAVITY SDR 26 SEWERSERVICE AT 2% MINIMUM SLOPE (SIZE TO BEDETERMINED PRIOR TO BUILDING PERMIT)INVERT AT CLEANOUT=7939.0INSTALL 2-WAY CLEANOUT W/ FRAME & GRATEPROPOSED LOCATION OF ELECTRICMETERS & DISTRIBUTION PANELCONNECT SEWEREJECTOR LINE TOGRAVITY SEWER SERVICEENTRY PORCH W/ WATER ENTRY ROOMLOCATED BELOW WITHIN CRAWLSPACE 3.58.0PROPOSED DRAINAGE DRY-WELLPROPOSED SEWER MANHOLEPROPOSED WATER VALVEPROPOSED ELECTRIC TRANSFORMERPROPOSED SEWER CLEANOUTPROPOSED STORM INLETPROPOSED 8" WATER MAIN8'' WLPROPOSED 8" SANITARY SEWER MAINPROPOSED TELEPHONEPROPOSED UNDERGROUND ELECTRICPROPOSED CABLEPROPOSED STORM SEWERTELTELUETVTV8'' SAEXISTING WATER VALVEEXISTING ELECTRIC TRANSFORMEREXISTING TELEPHONE PEDESTALEXISTING CATV PEDESTALEXISTING WATER MAINXWLXWLEXISTING 8" SANITARY SEWER MAINEXISTING GASEXISTING TELEPHONEXGASXGASEXISTING UNDERGROUND ELECTRICEXISTING CABLEXUTXUTXELXELXTVXTVEXISTING IRRIGATION PIPEXIRRXIRRXSAXSAOPRISESNGINEERING, LLC.CIVIL CONSULTANTSJOB NO.DATE:502 MAIN STREETCARBONDALE, CO 81623(970) 704-0311FAX: (970)-704-0313DESIGNED BYDRAWN BYCHECKED BYDATE REVISIONDRAWING NO.TITLEG:\2022\32149-1020 E COOPER AVENUE\CIVIL\CIVIL DWGS\PLOT\C2.0-UTILITY PLAN.DWG - Sep 15, 2022 - 3:00pm NORTH1 inch = ft.( IN FEET )GRAPHIC SCALE055105202.5UTILITY PLAN LEGENDMEMBER UTILITIESFOR THE MARKING OF UNDERGROUNDBEFORE YOU DIG, GRADE, OR EXCAVATECALL 2-BUSINESS DAYS IN ADVANCEKnow what'sbelow.before you dig.CallR1. ALL MINIMUM DEPTHS, SEPARATION DISTANCES, MATERIALS AND/OR USE OF CONDUIT SHALLBE CONFIRMED AND COORDINATED WITH THE UTILITY PROVIDER PER UTILITY AGREEMENTS.2. ALL UTILITY LINES AND/OR CONDUITS TO BE BACKFILLED WITH SUITABLE MATERIAL FREE OFROCKS >1 1/2" Ø. USE CLASS 6 AGGREGATE BASE MATERIAL FOR BEDDING, AND/OR SUITABLEONSITE MATERIAL. INSTALL PER UTILITY PROVIDER SPECIFICATIONS. BACKFILL TRENCHESWITH SUITABLE ONSITE MATERIALS. MINIMUM COMPACTION 95% IN PAVED AREAS.3. ALL HORIZONTAL AND VERTICAL UTILITY SEPARATIONS SHALL BE IN ACCORDANCE WITH CITYOF ASPEN DESIGN STANDARDS.1. CONTRACTOR TO COORDINATE ABANDONMENT, RELOCATION, AND BURIAL OF THE EXISTING UTILITIES WITHTHE UTILITY PROVIDERS PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION.2. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL CONTAIN HIS CONSTRUCTION OPERATIONS WITHIN THE LIMITS OF CONSTRUCTION.CONTRACTOR SHALL NOT OPERATE OUTSIDE THIS AREA WITHOUT THE PRIOR CONSENT OF THE PROPERTYOWNER(S) INVOLVED.3. THE LOCATIONS OF UNDERGROUND UTILITIES HAVE BEEN PLOTTED BASED ON UTILITY MAPS, LOCATES OROTHER INFORMATION PROVIDED BY UTILITY COMPANIES AND ACTUAL FIELD LOCATIONS IN SOME INSTANCES.THESE UTILITIES, AS SHOWN MAY NOT REPRESENT ACTUAL FIELD CONDITIONS. IT IS THE RESPONSIBILITY OFTHE CONTRACTOR TO CONTACT ALL UTILITY COMPANIES FOR FIELD LOCATION OF UTILITIES PRIOR TOCONSTRUCTION.4. ALL UTILITIES, BOTH UNDERGROUND AND OVERHEAD, SHALL BE MAINTAINED IN CONTINUOUS SERVICETHROUGHOUT THE ENTIRE CONSTRUCTION PERIOD. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE AND LIABLEFOR ANY DAMAGES TO, OR INTERRUPTION OF, SERVICES CAUSED BY THE CONSTRUCTION.5. ALL SITE AND UTILITY WORK SHALL BE IN COMPLIANCE WITH CITY OF ASPEN RULES & REGULATIONS. APRE-CONSTRUCTION MEETING IS REQUIRED PRIOR TO COMMENCEMENT OF WORK.6. EXISTING CONDITIONS SURVEY PROVIDED BY SOPRIS ENGINEERING, LLC.7. CONTRACTOR SHALL PROTECT ALL EXISTING TREES THAT ARE TO REMAIN. A TREE PROTECTION PLAN MUST BEAPPROVED BY CITY PARKS DEPARTMENT AND LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT PRIOR TO COMMENCING CONSTRUCTION.8. ALL UTILITY METER LOCATIONS SHOWN FOR REFERENCE. REFER TO MEP PLANS FOR FURTHER INFORMATIONGENERAL UTILITY NOTES:SHALLOW UTILITY NOTES:NOTE:THESE PLANS ARE CONCEPTUAL OR ILLUSTRATIVE IN NATURE. PRECISE INFORMATION SHALL BE PROVIDED ASPART OF THE BUILDING PERMIT APPLICATION, AND IN SITUATIONS WHERE THE FINAL HPC APPROVAL PLANSAND APPROVED BUILDING PERMIT DIFFER, THE APPROVED BUILDING PERMIT SHALL RULE.PROPOSED SAWCUTPROPOSED FULL DEPTH ASPHALTPROPOSED 2" ASPHALT OVERLAYPROPOSED LEGENDPROPOSED GRAVELPROPOSED PLANTING BEDPROPOSED LAWN AREAREDUCED FORATTACHMENT TO REPORTJOB NO.DATE:C-2.0SCHEMATICUTILITY PLAN3214909-16-2022SCHEMATIC DESIGN 1020 E. COOPER AVENUE ASPEN, COLORADO FINAL HPC APPROVAL LRJ09/12/22LRJ 09/12/22JKS 09/15/22 RIVERSIDE CONDO ASSOCPARCEL #2737181278011024 E COOPER AVE(NOT PART OF PROJECT)COOPER AVE VICTORIAN CONDO ASSOCPARCEL #2737182328021012 E COOPER AVE(NOT PART OF PROJECT)E. COOPER AVE.PROPOSED AFFORDABLE HOUSINGDEVELOPMENTTOTAL PROPOSED IMPERVIOUSAREA: 3,640 SFTOTAL SITE IMPERVIOUS: 83%CONCRETE PATIO1020 E COOPER1024 E COOPERUELUEL>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>sasvcsasvcsasvcTVAPPROXIMATE LIMITSOF ROOF OVERHANGAPPROXIMATE LOCATION OFWATER QUALITY DRYWELL.NOTE: DRYWELL TO BE LOCATED10' FROM PRIVATE PROPERTY LINEAND STRUCTURESPROPOSED BURIED STORMWATERCONVEYANCE PIPE, TYP.PROPOSED BURIED STORMWATERCONVEYANCE PIPE, TYP.PROPOSED BURIED STORMWATERCONVEYANCE PIPE, TYP.PROPOSED CONCRETE WALKWAY.PROPOSED VALLEY INLET.ADDITIONALLY SERVES ASDRYWELL OVERFLOW POINTPROPOSED CONCRETE DRAIN PAN.PROPOSED TRENCH DRAINPROPOSED AREA INLETPROPOSED AREA INLETPROPOSED AREA INLETPROPOSED AREA INLETPROPOSED AREA INLETEXISTING SINGLE STORY RESIDENCETOTAL EXISTING SITE IMPERVIOUSAREA: 1,945 SF ±EXISTING SITE IMPERVIOUS: 45%OS-1OS-2OS-3RIVERSIDE CONDO ASSOCCOOPER AVE VICTORIANCONDO ASSOCCHATEAU EAU CLAIREOS-4EXISTING INLETAT LOW POINTEXISTING INLETAT LOW POINTEAST COOPER STREETOPRISESNGINEERING, LLC.CIVIL CONSULTANTSJOB NO.DATE:502 MAIN STREETCARBONDALE, CO 81623(970) 704-0311FAX: (970)-704-0313DESIGNED BYDRAWN BYCHECKED BYDATE REVISIONDRAWING NO.TITLEG:\2022\32149-1020 E COOPER AVENUE\CIVIL\CIVIL DWGS\PLOT\C3.0-DRN PLAN.DWG - Sep 15, 2022 - 1:49pm MEMBER UTILITIESFOR THE MARKING OF UNDERGROUNDBEFORE YOU DIG, GRADE, OR EXCAVATECALL 2-BUSINESS DAYS IN ADVANCEKnow what'sbelow.before you dig.CallRNORTH1 inch = ft.( IN FEET )GRAPHIC SCALE0202040208010NOTE:THESE PLANS ARE CONCEPTUAL OR ILLUSTRATIVE IN NATURE. PRECISE INFORMATION SHALL BE PROVIDED ASPART OF THE BUILDING PERMIT APPLICATION, AND IN SITUATIONS WHERE THE FINAL HPC APPROVAL PLANSAND APPROVED BUILDING PERMIT DIFFER, THE APPROVED BUILDING PERMIT SHALL RULE.NORTH1 inch = ft.( IN FEET )GRAPHIC SCALE055105202.5EXISTING CONDITIONSPOST DEVELOPMENT CONDITIONSPOST DEVELOPMENT DRAINAGE BASINLEGENDEXISTING DRAINAGE BASINDRAINAGE FLOW ARROWEXISTING CONTOUREXISTING CONTOUR INTERVAL7900PROPOSED CONTOURPROPOSED CONTOUR INTERVAL7900EXISTING GIS CONTOURC-3.0SCHEMATICDRAINAGEMITIGATION PLAN3214909-16-2022SCHEMATIC DESIGN 1020 E. COOPER AVENUE ASPEN, COLORADO FINAL HPC APPROVAL LRJ09/12/22LRJ 09/12/22JKS 09/15/22 Channel Report Hydraflow Express Extension for Autodesk® AutoCAD® Civil 3D® by Autodesk, Inc.Wednesday, Oct 14 2020 OS-1 4' PAN, 100yr Triangular Side Slopes (z:1) = 10.00, 10.00 Total Depth (ft) = 0.20 Invert Elev (ft) = 100.00 Slope (%)= 1.50 N-Value = 0.013 Calculations Compute by:Known Q Known Q (cfs) = 0.43 Highlighted Depth (ft)= 0.14 Q (cfs)= 0.430 Area (sqft)= 0.20 Velocity (ft/s)= 2.19 Wetted Perim (ft) = 2.81 Crit Depth, Yc (ft) = 0.17 Top Width (ft)= 2.80 EGL (ft)= 0.21 0 .5 1 1.5 2 2.5 3 3.5 4 4.5 5 Elev (ft)Depth (ft)Section 99.75 -0.25 100.00 0.00 100.25 0.25 100.50 0.50 100.75 0.75 101.00 1.00 Reach (ft) Channel Report Hydraflow Express Extension for Autodesk® AutoCAD® Civil 3D® by Autodesk, Inc.Wednesday, Oct 14 2020 OS-1 4' PAN Triangular Side Slopes (z:1) = 10.00, 10.00 Total Depth (ft) = 0.20 Invert Elev (ft) = 100.00 Slope (%)= 1.50 N-Value = 0.013 Calculations Compute by:Q vs Depth No. Increments = 10 Highlighted Depth (ft)= 0.02 Q (cfs)= 0.003 Area (sqft)= 0.00 Velocity (ft/s)= 0.65 Wetted Perim (ft) = 0.40 Crit Depth, Yc (ft) = 0.03 Top Width (ft)= 0.40 EGL (ft)= 0.03 0 .5 1 1.5 2 2.5 3 3.5 4 4.5 5 Elev (ft)Depth (ft)Section 99.75 -0.25 100.00 0.00 100.25 0.25 100.50 0.50 100.75 0.75 101.00 1.00 Reach (ft) Channel Report Hydraflow Express Extension for Autodesk® AutoCAD® Civil 3D® by Autodesk, Inc.Wednesday, Oct 14 2020 OS-2 COOPER STREET NORTH, 100yr User-defined Invert Elev (ft) = 100.00 Slope (%)= 1.50 N-Value = 0.013 Calculations Compute by:Known Q Known Q (cfs) = 0.18 (Sta, El, n)-(Sta, El, n)... ( -20.00, 100.89)-(0.50, 100.38, 0.013) Highlighted Depth (ft)= 0.13 Q (cfs)= 0.180 Area (sqft)= 0.10 Velocity (ft/s)= 1.81 Wetted Perim (ft) = 1.66 Crit Depth, Yc (ft) = 0.15 Top Width (ft)= 1.53 EGL (ft)= 0.18 -5 0 5 10 Elev (ft)Depth (ft)Section 99.75 -0.25 100.00 0.00 100.25 0.25 100.50 0.50 100.75 0.75 101.00 1.00 Sta (ft) Channel Report Hydraflow Express Extension for Autodesk® AutoCAD® Civil 3D® by Autodesk, Inc.Wednesday, Oct 14 2020 OS-2 COOPER STREET NORTH, MAX User-defined Invert Elev (ft) = 100.00 Slope (%)= 1.50 N-Value = 0.013 Calculations Compute by:Known Depth Known Depth (ft) = 0.38 (Sta, El, n)-(Sta, El, n)... ( -20.00, 100.89)-(0.50, 100.38, 0.013) Highlighted Depth (ft)= 0.38 Q (cfs)= 4.320 Area (sqft)= 1.11 Velocity (ft/s)= 3.91 Wetted Perim (ft) = 7.51 Crit Depth, Yc (ft) = 0.46 Top Width (ft)= 7.13 EGL (ft)= 0.61 -5 0 5 10 Elev (ft)Depth (ft)Section 99.75 -0.25 100.00 0.00 100.25 0.25 100.50 0.50 100.75 0.75 101.00 1.00 Sta (ft) Channel Report Hydraflow Express Extension for Autodesk® AutoCAD® Civil 3D® by Autodesk, Inc.Wednesday, Oct 14 2020 OS-3 5' SIDEWALK, 100yr User-defined Invert Elev (ft) = 100.00 Slope (%)= 1.50 N-Value = 0.013 Calculations Compute by:Known Q Known Q (cfs) = 0.06 (Sta, El, n)-(Sta, El, n)... ( 0.00, 100.10)-(5.00, 100.05, 0.013) Highlighted Depth (ft)= 0.04 Q (cfs)= 0.060 Area (sqft)= 0.08 Velocity (ft/s)= 0.75 Wetted Perim (ft) = 4.04 Crit Depth, Yc (ft) = 0.04 Top Width (ft)= 4.00 EGL (ft)= 0.05 -1 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 Elev (ft)Depth (ft)Section 99.75 -0.25 100.00 0.00 100.25 0.25 100.50 0.50 100.75 0.75 101.00 1.00 Sta (ft) Channel Report Hydraflow Express Extension for Autodesk® AutoCAD® Civil 3D® by Autodesk, Inc.Wednesday, Oct 14 2020 OS-3 5' SIDEWALK User-defined Invert Elev (ft) = 100.00 Slope (%)= 1.50 N-Value = Composite Calculations Compute by:Q vs Depth No. Increments = 10 (Sta, El, n)-(Sta, El, n)... ( 0.00, 100.10)-(5.00, 100.05, 0.013) Highlighted Depth (ft)= 0.05 Q (cfs)= 0.149 Area (sqft)= 0.13 Velocity (ft/s)= 1.19 Wetted Perim (ft) = 5.05 Crit Depth, Yc (ft) = 0.06 Top Width (ft)= 5.00 EGL (ft)= 0.07 -1 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 Elev (ft)Depth (ft)Section 99.75 -0.25 100.00 0.00 100.25 0.25 100.50 0.50 100.75 0.75 101.00 1.00 Sta (ft) Channel Report Hydraflow Express Extension for Autodesk® AutoCAD® Civil 3D® by Autodesk, Inc.Wednesday, Oct 14 2020 OS-4 COOPER STREET SOUTH, MAX User-defined Invert Elev (ft) = 100.00 Slope (%)= 1.50 N-Value = 0.013 Calculations Compute by:Known Q Known Q (cfs) = 5.10 (Sta, El, n)-(Sta, El, n)... ( -0.50, 100.46)-(2.00, 100.17, 0.013)-(10.00, 100.53, 0.013)-(23.00, 100.79, 0.013) Highlighted Depth (ft)= 0.41 Q (cfs)= 5.100 Area (sqft)= 1.29 Velocity (ft/s)= 3.95 Wetted Perim (ft) = 7.76 Crit Depth, Yc (ft) = 0.50 Top Width (ft)= 7.33 EGL (ft)= 0.65 -5 0 5 10 15 20 25 30 Elev (ft)Depth (ft)Section 99.75 -0.25 100.00 0.00 100.25 0.25 100.50 0.50 100.75 0.75 101.00 1.00 Sta (ft) Channel Report Hydraflow Express Extension for Autodesk® AutoCAD® Civil 3D® by Autodesk, Inc.Wednesday, Oct 14 2020 OS-4 COOPER STREET SOUTH, MAX User-defined Invert Elev (ft) = 100.00 Slope (%)= 1.50 N-Value = 0.013 Calculations Compute by:Known Depth Known Depth (ft) = 0.46 (Sta, El, n)-(Sta, El, n)... ( -0.50, 100.46)-(2.00, 100.17, 0.013)-(10.00, 100.53, 0.013)-(23.00, 100.79, 0.013) Highlighted Depth (ft)= 0.46 Q (cfs)= 7.688 Area (sqft)= 1.67 Velocity (ft/s)= 4.60 Wetted Perim (ft) = 8.88 Crit Depth, Yc (ft) = 0.58 Top Width (ft)= 8.41 EGL (ft)= 0.79 -5 0 5 10 15 20 25 30 Elev (ft)Depth (ft)Section 99.75 -0.25 100.00 0.00 100.25 0.25 100.50 0.50 100.75 0.75 101.00 1.00 Sta (ft) Kumar & Associates Kumar & Associates Kumar & Associates TABLE 1 PERCOLATION TEST RESULTS PROJECT NO. 21-7-386 HOLE NO. HOLE DEPTH (INCHES) LENGTH OF INTERVAL (MIN) WATER DEPTH AT START OF INTERVAL (INCHES) WATER DEPTH AT END OF INTERVAL (INCHES) DROP IN WATER LEVEL (INCHES) AVERAGE PERCOLATION RATE (MIN./INCH) 10 38 28 10 1 B-1 144 5 28 24½ 3½ 1.4 24½ 22 2½ 2 22 20½ 1½ 3.3 20½ 19½ 1 5 Note: The percolation test was conducted in the 4-inch diameter borehole on May 27, 2021. MIKE THELE, P.E. S t r u c t u r a I E n g i n e e r i n g S e r v i c e s, I n c. 0296 Seven Oaks Road : Carbondale, Colorado 81623 (970) 963-3181 : Toll Free (888) 845-3911 : Fax (970) 963-3182 mike@mikethelepe.com October 27, 2020 Collin Frank, AIA DJ Architects 119 South Spring St. Ste. 203 Aspen, Colorado 81611 Re: 1020 East Cooper Project Aspen, Colorado Dear Collin, This is in regards to proposed improvements to the existing residence at 1020 East Cooper Street in Aspen. Current plans by your office indicate that the existing building is to be moved on the site to facilitate construction of a full basement and building additions placed to the north. On May 30, 2019 I visited the project site to observe and review the existing residence in regards to its soundness, ability to withstand the physical move and its rehabilitation needs after the move. The existing residence is a single story wood framed structure with gable roofs and a framed floor over a shallow crawl space. I understand that the south portion of the residence including the living room and two bedrooms is the original construction and is considered historic. The north portion including the kitchen, dining and an additional bedroom are a subsequent addition to the original. The addition appears to have a concrete foundation. The crawlspace below the original construction was not accessible. Portions of the building may have experienced some settlement considering the limited function of some doors and windows. Based on observations the existing building structure appears to be basically sound and should be able to withstand the physical move. I understand that the Covered Patio along the north side of the building is to be demolished prior to the move. The physical move of the building should be conducted by a qualified building mover with appropriate experience in stabilizing and moving similar structures. Rehabilitation needs will include a full review and analysis of the existing building structure to determine if the structure meets current building code requirements and to coordinate with the proposed new construction plans. The existing roof structure will likely need improvements to meet current roof snow load demands. The existing floor structure may need to be replaced or modified to 1020 East Cooper Project October 27, 2020 Page two coordinate with the new basement plans. Complete construction documents would be required for the proposed remodel and additions. The conclusions of this review are based on visual observations only. No finish materials were removed to observe concealed conditions and no measurements or analyses were provided. Regards, Neighborhood Context 1 - 1000 East Cooper, single family home, AspenVictorian 2 - 1006 East Cooper, single family home, AspenVictorian 3 - 1012 East Cooper, 5 unit multifamily building “Cooper Ave Victorians” 4 - 1024 East Cooper, 10 unit multifamily building “Riverside Condos” 5 - 1034 East Cooper, ~25 unit multifamily building “Chateau Eau Claire” 6 - 1039 East Cooper, ~47 unit multifamily building “Chateau Roaring Fork” 7 - 1001 East Cooper, 8 unit multifamily building “Villager Townhouse” 8 - 949 East Cooper, 5 unit property “East Cooper Court”, AspenVictorian 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 1 2 3 44 5 6 78 6 Proposed 1020 East Cooper Project COOPERN33° 32' 03" W 687.12' TIEEAST COOPER AVENUEEAST HYMAN AVENUECLEVEL A N D S T R E E T ALLEY (20.20') 13.79'LOT KLOT LLOT MLOT NLOT OLOT PLOT QLOT RLOT ALOT BLOT CLOT DLOT ELOT FLOT GLOT HCOOPER A V E V I C T O R I A N C O N D O A S S O C PARCEL # 2 7 3 7 1 8 2 3 2 8 0 2 1012 E C O O P E R A V E ASPEN, C O 8 1 6 1 1 STOVER R A Y M O N D J H J R & M A R Y L PARCEL # 2 7 3 7 1 8 2 3 2 0 0 4 1006 E C O O P E R A V E ASPEN, C O 8 1 6 1 1 MCDON A L D S C O T T PARCEL # 2 7 3 7 1 8 2 3 2 0 0 3 1000 E C O O P E R A V E ASPEN, C O 8 1 6 1 1 RIVERSI D E C O N D O A S S O C PARCEL # 2 7 3 7 1 8 1 2 7 8 0 1 1024 E C O O P E R A V E ASPEN, C O 8 1 6 1 1 SILVER G L E N T O W N H O U S E S C O N D O A S S O C PARCEL # 2 7 3 7 1 8 1 1 2 8 0 0 E HYMA N A V E ASPEN, C O 8 1 6 1 1 VINCEN T I C O N D O A S S O C PARCEL # 2 7 3 7 1 8 1 1 2 8 0 0 E HYMA N A V E ASPEN, C O 8 1 6 1 1 SUNRISE C O N D O A S S O C PARCEL # 2 7 3 7 1 8 2 3 2 8 0 1 1007 E H Y M A N A V E ASPEN, C O 8 1 6 1 1 COOPER T A C H E C H R I S T E N PARCEL # 2 7 3 7 1 8 2 3 2 0 0 1 1001 E H Y M A N A V E ASPEN, C O 8 1 6 1 1 RIGHT-OF-WAY (73.70') SUBJECT P R O P E R T Y PARCEL # 2 7 3 7 1 8 2 3 2 0 0 6 1020 E C O O P E R A V E ASPEN, C O 8 1 6 1 1 4,379 S Q . F T . ± O R 0 . 1 0 1 A C R E S ±S73° 21' 03"W 617.26' TIEFOUND #4 REBAR & YELLOW PLASTIC CAP PLS 25947 0.2' BELOW GRADE ELEV=7942.5 FOUND #5 REBAR & RED PLASTIC CAP PLS 33638 0.2' ABOVE GRADE ELEV=7946.3 FOUND #5 REBAR 0.3' BELOW GRADE FOUND #5 REBAR & YELLOW PLASTIC CAP PLS 19598 0.1' ABOVE GRADE FOUND #5 REBAR & YELLOW PLASTIC CAP PLS 2376 0.2' BELOW GRADE FOUND #5 REBAR & YELLOW PLASTIC CAP ILLEGIBLE 0.3' ABOVE GRADE FOUND 1" IRON PIPE FOUND #5 REBAR & YELLOW PLASTIC CAP ILLEGIBLE 0.1' BELOW GRADE FOUND #5 REBAR & YELLOW PLASTIC CAP ILLEGIBLE 0.3 ABOVE GRADE FOUND #5 REBAR 0.2' ABOVE GRADE FOUND #5 REBAR & YELLOW PLASTIC CAP PLS 19598 FLUSH WITH GRADE FOUND #4REBAR & RED PLASTIC CAP PLS 24303 0.1' BELOW GRADE SET #5 REBAR & ORANGE PLASTIC CAP PLS 28643 FLUSH WITH GRADE NEAREST INTERSECTION OFCOOPER AVE & CLEAVLAND ST(177.9')N15° 46' 0 3 " E 8 7 8 . 9 5 ' ASPEN G P S - 4 WEST E N D & HOPKIN S ASPEN G P S - 1 WEST E N D & DURANT SURVEYOR'S CERTIFICATE I, Mark S. Beckler, hereby certify to: 1020 Cooper LLC, a Colorado limited liability company and Land Title Guarantee Company That this is an "Improvement Survey Plat" as defined by C.R.S. § 38-51-102(9) and that it is a monumented Land Survey showing the location of all setbacks, structures, visible utilities, fences, or walls situated on the described parcel and within five feet of all boundaries of such parcel, any conflicting boundary evidence or visible encroachments, utilities marked by client and all depicted easements described in Land Title Guarantee Company's, commitment for title insurance file no. Q62010331.1, or other sources as specified on the improvement survey plat. The error of closure for this plat is less than 1/15,000. _____________________________________ Mark S. Beckler L.S. #28643 2020-08-07 PROPERTY DESCRIPTION The Easterly 13.79 feet of Lot O and all of Lot P, Block 34, East Aspen Addition to the City of Aspen According to the Lot Line Adjustment/Subdivision Exemption Plat of 1020 E. Copper, recorded October 8, 2019 as reception no. 659373. County of Pitkin State of Colorado NOTICE: ACCORDING TO COLORADO LAW YOU MUST COMMENCE ANY LEGAL ACTION BASED UPON ANY DEFECT IN THIS SURVEY WITHIN THREE YEARS AFTER YOU FIRST DISCOVER SUCH DEFECT. IN NO EVENT MAY ANY ACTION BASED UPON ANY DEFECT IN THIS SURVEY BE COMMENCED MORE THAN TEN YEARS FROM THE DATE OF CERTIFICATION SHOWN HEREON. SOPRIS ENGINEERING - LLC CIVIL CONSULTANTS 502 MAIN STREET, SUITE A3 CARBONDALE, COLORADO 81623 (970) 704-0311 SOPRISENG@SOPRISENG.COM 8/7/2020 - 30111 - G:\2020\30111\SURVEY\Survey DWGs\Survey Plots and Exhibits\30111_ISP.dwg VICINITY MAP SCALE: 1" = 2000' GENERAL UTILITY NOTES: The locations of underground utilities have been plotted based on utility maps, construction/design plans, other information provided by utility companies and actual field locations in some instances. These utilities, as shown, may not represent actual field conditions. It is the responsibility of the contractor to contact all utility companies for field location of utilities prior to construction. IMPROVEMENT SURVEY PLAT 1020 E COOPER AVE THE EASTERLY 13.79 FEET OF LOT 0 AND ALL OF LOT P, BLOCK 34, EAST ASPEN ADDITION TO THE CITY OF ASPEN PITKIN COUNTY, STATE OF COLORADO. SHEET 1 OF 2 SOURCE DOCUMENTS: ·the Improvement Survey Map certified June 4, 2019 prepared by Tuttle Surveying Services, Job #19053 (not of the Pitkin County, Colorado Records) ·the Plat of East Aspen Addition, recorded August 24, 1959 in Book 2 at Page 252 ·Lot Line Adjustment/Subdivision Exemption Plat, recorded October 8, 2019 as Reception No. 659373. ·Historic Preservation Resolution #21, Series of 2019, recorded December 26, 2019 as Reception No. 661468 ALL OF THE PITKIN COUNTY, COLORADO RECORDS-UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED. NOTES 1)Date of Survey: July 2020. 2)Date of Preparation: July - August 2020. 3)Linear Units: The linear unit used in the preparation of this plat is the U.S. Survey Foot as defined by the United States Department of Commerce, National Institute of Standards and Technology. 4)Basis of Bearing: Bearings are based on the 2009 Marcin Engineering-City of Aspen Control Map, yielding a site bearing of N 74°18'31" W from the SE Corner of Lot L, Block 34, East Aspen Addition, a found #5 rebar and yellow plastic cap illegible, and the South East Corner of said BLock 34, a found #5 rebar and yellow plastic cap PLS 19598. 5)This survey does not constitute a title search by Sopris Engineering, LLC (SE) to determine ownership or easements of record. For all information regarding easements, rights of way and/or title of record, SE relied upon a title commitment prepared by Land Title Guarantee Company, Order Number Q62010331.1, Effective Date, July 2, 2020 and documents and plats of record as shown in the Source Documents, hereon. 6)Basis of elevation: The 1998 City of Aspen Drexel Barrel control datum, which is based on an elevation of 7720.88' (NAVD 1988) on the NGS station "S-159". This established two site benchmarks, shown on page 1. 7)The FIRM flood map for this property is number 08097C0366E, effective on 08/15/2019, property is in area of minimal flood hazard, zone X. 8)Slope - 0 - 10% per "Percent Slope within Aspen". City of Aspen - June 1, 2009 and per field work all natural slopes 0 - 10% this survey. 9)Geological Hazards - None per "Potential Geological Hazards Area". City of Aspen Master Drainage Plan. WRC Engineering Inc. - 2001 10)Mud Flow None per "Maximum Flow Depth, 100-Year Event". City of Aspen Master Drainage Plan. WRC Engineering Inc. - 2001 nor per "Aspen Mountain Mud Flow Zones". City of Aspen Urban Runoff Management Plan Fig. 7.1 - 2010 11)Wetlands - None per "U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service National Wetland Inventory Map" 12)Contour Interval: One (1) foot. 13)Tree measurements were performed to City of Aspen standards (Aspen Municipal Code Chapter 13 Sec. 13.20.020). 14)Address: 1020 E COOPER AVE 15)Pitkin County Parcel No.--273-718-23-2006 SITE 1 inch = ft. ( IN FEET ) GRAPHIC SCALE 020 20 40 20 8010 XGAS X G A S X G A S XGASXGASXGASXGASXGASXGASXGASXGASXTVXTVXTVXTVXTVXTVXTVXTVXTVXTVXTVXTVXTVXTVXTVXTVXTVXTVXTVXTVXTVXTVXTVXTVXTVXTVXTVXTVXTVXTVXTVXTVXTVXTVXTVXTVXTVXTVXTVXTVXTVXTVXTVXTVXTVXTVXTVXTVXTVXTVXTVXTVXTVXTVXTVXTVXTVXTVXTVXTVXTVXTVXTVXTVXTVXTVXTVXTVXTVXTVXTVXTVXUTXUTXUTXUTXUTXUTXUTXUTXUTXUTXUTXUTXUTXUTXUTXUTXUTXUTXUTXUTXUTXUTXUTXUTXUTXUTXUTXUTXUTXUTXUTXUTXUTXUTXUTXUTXUTXUTXUTXUTXUTXUTXUTXUTXUTXUTXUTXUTXUT XUT XUT XUT XUT XU T XU T X U T XUT XUT XUT XUT XUT XWLXWLXWLXWLXWLXWLXWLXWLXWLXWLXWLXWLXWLXWLXWLXWLXWLXWLXWLXWLXWLXWLXWLXWLXWLXWLXWLXELXELXELXELXELXELXELXELXELXELXELXELXELXELXELXELXELXELXELXELXELXELXELXELXELXELXELXELXELXELXELXELXELXELXELXELXEL XEL XEL XEL XELXELXELXELXELXELXELXELXELXELXELXELXELXELxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx x x x x x x x xXGASXGASXGASXGASXGASXGASXGASXGASXGASXGASXGASXGASXGASXGASXGASXGAS XGASXGASXGASXGASXGASXGASXGASXGASXGASXGASXGASXGASXGASXGASXGASXGASXGASXGASXGASXGASXGASXGASXGASXGASXGASXGAS5'STBK 5'STBK 5'STBK 5'STBK 5'STBK 5'STBK 5'STBK 5'STBK 5'STBK 5'STBK 5'STBK 5'STBK 5'STBK 5'STBK 5'STBK 5'STBK 5'STBK 10'STBK10'STBK10'STBK10'STBK10'STBK10'STBK10'STBK15'STBK15'STBK15'STBK15'STBK15'STBK15'STBK15'STBK5'STBK5'STBK5'STBK5'STBK5'STBK5'STBK5'STBK5'STBK5'STBK5'STBK5'STBK5'STBK5'STBK5'STBK5'STBK5'STBK5'STBK10'STBK10'STBK10'STBK10'STBK10'STBK10'STBK10'STBK5'STBK5'STBK5'STBK5'STBK5'STBK5'STBK5'STBKXSAXSAXSAXSAXSAXSAXSAXSAXSAXSAXSAXSAXSAXSAXSAXSAXSAXSAXSAXSAXSAXSAXSAEAST COOPER AVENUEALLEY (20.20')LOT OLOT ELOT FLOT GRIGHT-OF- W A Y (73.70') 10' SETBACK 10' SETBACK 5' SETBACK 5' SETBACK RAISED WOODEN PLANTER RAISED WOODEN PLANTER GATE EX:7944.5'±EX:7944.5'±EX:7944.6'±EX:7944.5'±EX:7944.5'±EX:7944.5'±EX:7944.5'±EX:7944.0'±EX:7944.2'±EX:7944.1'±EX:7943.9'±EX:7943.9'±EX:7944.1'±EX:7944.0'±EX:7944.1'±EX:7943.6'±EX:7943.3'±EX:7942.9'±EX:7942.8'±EX:7942.9'±EX:7942.9'±EX:7942.9'±EX:7942.9'±EX:7943.0'±EX:7942.9'±EX:7943.0'±EX:7942.9'±EX:7942.9'±EX:7943.5'±EX:7943.5'±EX:7943.4'±EX:7943.4'±EX:7943.0'± EX:7943.1'±EX:7943.0'±EX:7943.0'±794579457944 7943 7944 7943 7943 7943 794379437943 7943 7943 79 4 4 7944 79457945794412.2'5.0'17.5'35.0'29.7'40.0' 7.3'29.7'7.5'14.1'10.3'14.1'10.3'20.2'12.1'20.1'12.1' MAILBOX CONCRETE CONCRETE SIDEWALKCONCRETE GRAVEL GRAVEL GRAVEL CONCRETE P O R C H WITH ROOF O V E R H A N G ASPHALTTOP BACK OF CURB FLOWLINE OF CURB CURB STOP CABLE BOX BUSH BUSH BUSH BUSH 4 TREES DECIDUOU S 2.8"X6' TREE DECIDUOU S 1.5"X3' TREE CONIFERO U S 14.1"X28' FINISHED FLOOR 7944.8'± FINISHED FLOOR 7943.3'± FINISHED FLOOR 7943.2'± FINISHED FLOOR 7944.8'± BALLARD CONCRETE PAD TRANSFORMER & PAD GAS METER TELEPHONE PEDESTAL TELEPHONE CONNECTION ELECTRIC METER TELEPHONE PEDESTAL ROCK RETAINING WALL ROCK RETAINING WALL LOG DECORATIVE BORDER 4' WIRE FENCE 2.5' WOOD FENCE4' WOOD FENCE 3' WOOD FENCE2.5' METAL FENCE1 STORY S I N G L E F A M I L Y WOOD FRA M E STRUCTUR E 1020 E CO O P E R A V E , ASPEN, CO 8 1 6 1 1 CONCRETE PORCH WITH ROOF OVERHANG SHED SHED RAIL ROAD TIE RETAINING WALL EX:7945.3'±EX:7944.8'±EX:7944.5'±EX:7944.5'±EX:7944.3'±EX:7944.3'±EX:7944.1'±EX:7944.0'±EX:7944.3'±EX:7944.5'±EX:7944.7'±EX:7944.8'±EX:7944.8'±EX:7944.9'±S74° 18' 31"E 43.79'S15° 41' 29"W 100.00'N74° 18' 31"W 43.79'N15° 41' 29"E 100.00' TREE CONIFERO U S 10.8"X21'N74° 18' 31"W 239.94'(BASIS OF BEARING)2.2' 4.4' 3.7' 0.9' 2.4' 22.7'EX:7945.0'±EX:7944.7'±EX:7944.3'±EX:7944.3'±EX:7943.8'±EX:7942.7'±EX:7944.0'±EX:7942.5'±EX:7942.7'±EX:7942.5'±EX:7942.8'±EX:7943.0'±EX:7943.3'±EX:7943.3'±EX:7943.3'±EX:7943.4'±EX:7943.1'±EX:7943.2'±EX:7943.0'±EX:7943.1'±EX:7943.0'±EX:7942.8'±EX:7944.1'±PRINCIPLE BUILDING SETBACKACCESSORY BUILDING SETBACK15' SETBACK PRINCIPLE BUILDING SETBACKACCESSORY BUILDING SETBACK5' SETBACK METAL STAIRS FREE STANDING TRANSFORMER & PAD 2.09' 8' 2' 2'X8' ELECTRIC EASEMENT (BOOK 126 PAGE 7) 8' 3.5' 3.5'X8' ELECTRIC EASEMENT (BOOK 126 PAGE 7)XSATEE XSASAN SEWER RIM = 7944.47 IN EAST 4" PVC = 7939.37 OUT WEST 4" PVC = 7938.45 SAN SEWER RIM = 7938.68 IN EAST 8" PVC = 7931.98 OUT WEST 8" PVC = 7931.99 NOTICE: ACCORDING TO COLORADO LAW YOU MUST COMMENCE ANY LEGAL ACTION BASED UPON ANY DEFECT IN THIS SURVEY WITHIN THREE YEARS AFTER YOU FIRST DISCOVER SUCH DEFECT. IN NO EVENT MAY ANY ACTION BASED UPON ANY DEFECT IN THIS SURVEY BE COMMENCED MORE THAN TEN YEARS FROM THE DATE OF CERTIFICATION SHOWN HEREON. SOPRIS ENGINEERING - LLC CIVIL CONSULTANTS 502 MAIN STREET, SUITE A3 CARBONDALE, COLORADO 81623 (970) 704-0311 SOPRISENG@SOPRISENG.COM 8/7/2020 - 30111 - G:\2020\30111\SURVEY\Survey DWGs\Survey Plots and Exhibits\30111_ISP.dwg GENERAL UTILITY NOTES: The locations of underground utilities have been plotted based on utility maps, construction/design plans, other information provided by utility companies and actual field locations in some instances. These utilities, as shown, may not represent actual field conditions. It is the responsibility of the contractor to contact all utility companies for field location of utilities prior to construction. IMPROVEMENT SURVEY PLAT THE EASTERLY 13.79 FEET OF LOT 0 AND ALL OF LOT P, BLOCK 34, EAST ASPEN ADDITION TO THE CITY OF ASPEN PITKIN COUNTY, STATE OF COLORADO. SHEET 2 OF 2 1 inch = ft. ( IN FEET ) GRAPHIC SCALE 04 4 8 4 162 EXISTING SANITARY SEWER MANHOLE EXISTING CURB STOP EXISTING GAS METER EXISTING ELECTRIC TRANSFORMER EXISTING ELECTRIC METER EXISTING TELEPHONE PEDESTAL EXISTING STORM SEWERXSDXSD EXISTING 8" WATER MAINXWLXWL EXISTING 8" SANITARY SEWER MAIN EXISTING GAS EXISTING TELEPHONE XGAS XGAS XGAS EXISTING UNDERGROUND ELECTRIC EXISTING CABLE XUT XUT XUT XEL XEL XEL XTV XTV XTV XSA XSA EXISTING LEGEND 1020 E COOPER AVE 52.0' 303.7' 1 1020 E. COOPER PROJECT | ASPEN CO 1020 E. COOPER PROJECT | ASPEN CO DRAWING ISSUE DRAWN BY: PROJECT No:1907 CPF HPC APPLICATION 10/28/2022 | ASPEN CO1020 E. COOPER PROJECT119 South Spring St. | Suite 203 Aspen, CO 81611 T 970-925-3444 www.djarchitects.com Z1.01 FAR PROPOSED All ideas, designs, arrangements and plans indicated or represented by this drawing are owned by and are the property of David Johnston Architects, PC and developed for use and in conjunction with the specified project. None of the ideas, designs, arrangements or plans shall be used by or disclosed for any purpose whatsoever without the written authorization of David Johnston Architects, PC. Sheet No. 30.01 sq ft 30.01 sq ft 25.51 sq ft 30.09 sq ft 38.01 sq ft 9'-6"9'-6" 8'-6" 10'-0"9'-6"8'-6" 10'-0"10'-0"363.24 sq ft 125.12 sq ft 202.01 sq ft 85.02 sq ft 199.91 sq ft 170.72 sq ft 199.91 sq ft 295.27 sq ft 65.09 sq ft 39.67 sq ft 84.91 sq ft 170.60 sq ft 97.89 sq ft 123.23 sq ft 2188.91 SF TOTAL BELOW GRADE WALL AREA -153.63 SF TOTAL EXPOSED BELOW GRADE WALL AREA 2035.28 SF TOTAL BURIED BELOW GRADE WALL AREA 93.0% BURIED 7.0% EXPOSEDCRAWLSPACE/MECH.CRAWLSPACE/MECH./WATER EGRESS 49.17 sq ft 4 BED AH UNIT #103 793.41 sq ft 2 BED AH UNIT #102 551.75 sq ft 2 BED AH UNIT #101 542.70 sq ft STORAGE 36.52 sq ft STORAGE 36.52 sq ft MECHANICAL 90.95 sq ft DECK 41.82 sq ft 3'-101/4"3'-11/2"CAR PORT 274.09 sq ft STORAGE 10.93 sq ft DECK 72.91 sq ft UP TRASH AREA 124.72 sq ft 3 BED AH UNIT #102 572.12 sq ft 2 BED AH UNIT #101 558.18 sq ft 4 BED AH UNIT #103 714.43 sq ft SCALE: 3/16" = 1'-0"-1 LOWER LEVEL AREA PLAN PROPOSED 0 4'8'12' SCALE: 3/16" = 1'-0"1 MAIN LEVEL AREA PLAN PROPOSED 0 4'8'12' DRAWING ISSUE DRAWN BY: PROJECT No:1907 CPF HPC APPLICATION 10/28/2022 | ASPEN CO1020 E. COOPER PROJECT119 South Spring St. | Suite 203 Aspen, CO 81611 T 970-925-3444 www.djarchitects.com Z1.02 FAR PROPOSED All ideas, designs, arrangements and plans indicated or represented by this drawing are owned by and are the property of David Johnston Architects, PC and developed for use and in conjunction with the specified project. None of the ideas, designs, arrangements or plans shall be used by or disclosed for any purpose whatsoever without the written authorization of David Johnston Architects, PC. Sheet No. 3 BED AH UNIT #201 1,065.57 sq ft DECK 139.73 sq ft UNIT #101 STORAGE 113.75 sq ft UNIT #102 BEDROOM 204.47 sq ft STORAGE 27.36 sq ft LEVEL USE TOTAL AREA FLOOR AREA 2 BED AH UNIT #101 542.7 0 3 BED AH UNIT #102 551.75 0 4 BED AH UNIT #103 793.41 0 EGRESS 49.17 0 MECHANICAL 90.95 0 STORAGE 73.04 0 TOTAL (7% exposed)2101.02 147.07 2 BED AH UNIT #101 558.19 558.19 3 BED AH UNIT #102 572.12 572.12 4 BED AH UNIT #103 714.43 714.43 STORAGE 10.93 10.93 3 BED AH UNIT #201 1065.57 1065.57 STORAGE #101 113.75 113.75 3 BED AH UNIT #102 BEDROOM 204.47 204.47 STORAGE #201 27.36 27.36 DECK 72.91 0 DECK 139.73 0 TOTAL DECKS (821.06sf exempt)212.64 0 CAR PORT 274.09 0 8168.23 3413.89 DECKS CARPORT F.A.R. SCHEDULE LOWER LEVEL MAIN LEVEL SECOND LEVEL SCALE: 3/16" = 1'-0"2 SECOND LEVEL AREA PLAN PROPOSED 0 4'8'12' DRAWING ISSUE DRAWN BY: PROJECT No:1907 CPF HPC APPLICATION 10/28/2022 | ASPEN CO1020 E. COOPER PROJECT119 South Spring St. | Suite 203 Aspen, CO 81611 T 970-925-3444 www.djarchitects.com Z1.03 NLA PROPOSED All ideas, designs, arrangements and plans indicated or represented by this drawing are owned by and are the property of David Johnston Architects, PC and developed for use and in conjunction with the specified project. None of the ideas, designs, arrangements or plans shall be used by or disclosed for any purpose whatsoever without the written authorization of David Johnston Architects, PC. Sheet No.CRAWLSPACE/MECH.CRAWLSPACE/MECH./WATERCRAWLSPACESTORAGE #103 27.95 sq ft STORAGE #102 27.95 sq ft 3 BED AH UNIT #102 482.85 sq ft 2 BED AH UNIT #101 462.52 sq ft 4 BED AH UNIT #103 653.20 sq ft DW RG RGSTORAGE #103 6.07 sq ft REF REF DW REF DWRG UP 3 BED AH UNIT #102 477.60 sq ft 2 BED AH UNIT #101 450.47 sq ft 4 BED AH UNIT #103 657.61 sq ft SCALE: 3/16" = 1'-0"-1 LOWER LEVEL NLA PLAN PROPOSED 0 4'8'12'SCALE: 3/16" = 1'-0"1 MAIN LEVEL NLA PLAN PROPOSED 0 4'8'12' DRAWING ISSUE DRAWN BY: PROJECT No:1907 CPF HPC APPLICATION 10/28/2022 | ASPEN CO1020 E. COOPER PROJECT119 South Spring St. | Suite 203 Aspen, CO 81611 T 970-925-3444 www.djarchitects.com Z1.04 NLA PROPOSED All ideas, designs, arrangements and plans indicated or represented by this drawing are owned by and are the property of David Johnston Architects, PC and developed for use and in conjunction with the specified project. None of the ideas, designs, arrangements or plans shall be used by or disclosed for any purpose whatsoever without the written authorization of David Johnston Architects, PC. Sheet No. DW RGSTORAGE #201 21.00 sq ft REF 3 BED AH UNIT #201 990.91 sq ft UNIT #101 STORAGE 104.27 sq ft UNIT #102 BEDROOM 182.89 sq ft NET LIVABLE SCHEDULE FLOOR LOWER LEVEL MAIN LEVEL SECOND LEVEL 2 BED AH UNIT #101 3 BED AH UNIT #102 4 BED AH UNIT #103 STORAGE #102 STORAGE #103 2 BED AH UNIT #101 3 BED AH UNIT #102 4 BED AH UNIT #103 STORAGE #103 3 BED AH UNIT #201 STORAGE #201 UNIT #101 STORAGE UNIT #102 BEDROOM AREA 462.52 482.85 653.20 27.95 27.95 450.47 477.60 657.61 6.07 990.91 21.00 104.27 182.89 4,545.29 ft² SCALE: 3/16" = 1'-0"2 SECOND LEVEL NLA PLAN PROPOSED 0 4'8'12' DRAWING ISSUE DRAWN BY: PROJECT No:1907 CPF HPC APPLICATION 10/28/2022 | ASPEN CO1020 E. COOPER PROJECT119 South Spring St. | Suite 203 Aspen, CO 81611 T 970-925-3444 www.djarchitects.com A1.01 SITE PLAN | EXISTING | 3/16" All ideas, designs, arrangements and plans indicated or represented by this drawing are owned by and are the property of David Johnston Architects, PC and developed for use and in conjunction with the specified project. None of the ideas, designs, arrangements or plans shall be used by or disclosed for any purpose whatsoever without the written authorization of David Johnston Architects, PC. Sheet No. 2'-51/16"2'-07/8"3'-9"3'-73/16"EXISTING TRANSFORMER METAL STAIRS RAIL ROAD TIE RETAINING WALL 4 DECIDUOUS TREES 2.8" X 6' DECIDUOUS TREE 1.5"X3' TOP BACK OF CURB FLOWLINE OF CURB ROCK RET. WALL ROCK RET. WALL 2.5' WOOD FENCE FOUND #5 REBAR .3' BELOW GRADE FIN. FLR. 7944.8'+/- FIN. FLR. 7944.8'+/- FOUND #5 REBAR & RED PLASTIC CAP PLS 336380.2' ABOVE GRADEELEV=7946.3 SET #5 REBAR & ORANGE PLASTIC CAP PLS 28643FLUSH WITH GRADE TELEPHONE PEDSTAL ELECTRICMETER FOUND #4 REBAR & YELLOW PLASTIC CAP PLS 259470.2' BELOW GRADEELEV=7942.5 TELEPHONECONNECTION 3.5'X8' ELECTRIC EASEMENT (BOOK 126 PAGE 7) GATE MAILBOX TELEPHONE PEDESTAL A L L E Y (20' WIDTH) EAST COOPER AVENUE LOT O LOT P LOT Q CONCRETECONCRETE SIDEWALKCONCRETECONCRETE PORCHW/ ROOF OVERHANG ASPHALT CABLEBOX BUSH BUSH BUSH BUSHLOG DECORATIVE BORDER4' WIRE FENCE4' WOOD FENCE3' WOOD FENCE 2.5' METAL FENCE 1 STORY SINGLE FAMILYWOOD FRAME STRUCTURE1020 E. COOPER AVE.ASPEN, CO 81611 SHED(TO BE DEMOLISHED) FIN. FLR.7943.3'± FINISHED FLOOR 7943.2'± CONCRETEPAD CONIFEROUSTREE14.1" X 28'(TO BE REMOVED) COOPER AVE. VICTORIANCONDO ASSOC.PARCEL #2737182328021012 E. COOPER AVE.ASPEN, CO 81611 RIVERSIDECONDO ASSOC.PARCEL #2737181278011024 E. COOPER AVE.ASPEN, CO 81611 CONCRETE PORCHW/ ROOF OVERHANG RAISEDWOODENPLANTER RAISEDWOODENPLANTER 7943 7944 7943 7945 794 5 SHED(TO BE DEMOLISHED)PROPERTY LINEPROPERTY LINE PROPERTY LINE HOUSE TO BE RELOCATED(SEE A1.02) EXISTINGTRANSFORMER 4,379 SQ.FT.± OR 0.101 ACRES± SUBJECT PROPERTYPARCEL #2737182320061020 E. COOPER AVE.ASPEN, CO 81611 8'-0"2'-23/8"2'-0"8'-0"3.5'X8' ELECTRIC EASEMENT (BOOK 126 PAGE 7) 2'X8' ELECTRIC EASEMENT (BOOK 126 PAGE 7) SETBACK SCALE: 3/16" = 1'-0"1 SITE PLAN | EXISTING | 3/16" 0 4'8'12' N DRAWING ISSUE DRAWN BY: PROJECT No:1907 CPF HPC APPLICATION 10/28/2022 | ASPEN CO1020 E. COOPER PROJECT119 South Spring St. | Suite 203 Aspen, CO 81611 T 970-925-3444 www.djarchitects.com A1.02 SITE PLAN | PROPOSED | 3/16" All ideas, designs, arrangements and plans indicated or represented by this drawing are owned by and are the property of David Johnston Architects, PC and developed for use and in conjunction with the specified project. None of the ideas, designs, arrangements or plans shall be used by or disclosed for any purpose whatsoever without the written authorization of David Johnston Architects, PC. Sheet No.5'-0"5'-0"5'-0"1'-6"5'-01/2"3'-1015/16"3'-0"2'-6" 2'-6" ENTRY PORCH ENTRY PORCH EGRESS EGRESS EGRESS BIKES HISTORIC STRUCTURE/ ADDITION FOOTPRINT PROPOSED NEW APARTMENT FOOTPRINT PROPOSED TRASH ENCLOSURE FOOTPRINT STORAGE CL. PLANTING BED PLANTING BEDPLANTING BED PLANTING BED EXISTING TRANSFORMER LAWN TOP BACK OF CURB FLOWLINE OF CURB FOUND #5 REBAR .3' BELOW GRADE FOUND #5 REBAR & RED PLASTIC CAP PLS 336380.2' ABOVE GRADEELEV=7946.3 SET #5 REBAR & ORANGE PLASTIC CAP PLS 28643FLUSH WITH GRADEFOUND #4 REBAR & YELLOW PLASTIC CAP PLS 259470.2' BELOW GRADEELEV=7942.5 3.5'X8' ELECTRIC EASEMENT (BOOK 126 PAGE 7) NEW FENCE GATENEW FENCE GATE NEW WOOD FENCE DN UPPLANTING BEDDN UTILITY METERS LAWN LAWN PLANTING BEDPLANTING BED PLANTING BED PLANTING BEDEGRESS PROPERTY LINEA L L E Y (20' WIDTH) SETBACKSETBACK SETBACKE A S T C O O P E R A V E . EAST COOPER AVENUE CONCRETE SIDEWALK ASPHALT 2.5' METAL FENCE COOPER AVE. VICTORIANCONDO ASSOC.PARCEL #2737182328021012 E. COOPER AVE.ASPEN, CO 81611 RIVERSIDECONDO ASSOC.PARCEL #2737181278011024 E. COOPER AVE.ASPEN, CO 81611PROPERTY LINEPROPERTY LINE PROPERTY LINE 4,379 SQ.FT.± OR 0.101 ACRES± SUBJECT PROPERTYPARCEL #2737182320061020 E. COOPER AVE.ASPEN, CO 81611 UP 5'-0"10'-0"ENTRY PORCH BBQ NEW TRANSFORMER 3.5'X8' ELECTRIC EASEMENT (BOOK 126 PAGE 7) 2'X8' ELECTRIC EASEMENT (BOOK 126 PAGE 7) NEW BOLLARDS NEW BOLLARDS SETBACK SCALE: 3/16" = 1'-0"1 SITE PLAN | PROPOSED | 1/4" 0 4'8'12' SITE 7945.78' = ARCH 100'-0" N DRAWING ISSUE DRAWN BY: PROJECT No:1907 CPF HPC APPLICATION 10/28/2022 | ASPEN CO1020 E. COOPER PROJECT119 South Spring St. | Suite 203 Aspen, CO 81611 T 970-925-3444 www.djarchitects.com A1.03 SITE PLAN | TIA | 3/16" All ideas, designs, arrangements and plans indicated or represented by this drawing are owned by and are the property of David Johnston Architects, PC and developed for use and in conjunction with the specified project. None of the ideas, designs, arrangements or plans shall be used by or disclosed for any purpose whatsoever without the written authorization of David Johnston Architects, PC. Sheet No.10'-0"5'-0"5'-0"5'-0"2'-2"4'-103/4"19'-0"97'-6" 98'-3" 100'-0" F.F.@98'-33/4" F.F.@100'-03/4" F.F.@ 97'-63/4" EXISTING TREE TO REMAIN- 10' DRIPLINE CRAWL ACCESS BIKE AREA ACCESS POINT PROPERTY LINESETBACKSETBACK SETBACKPROPERTY LINEPROPERTY LINE PROPERTY LINE 3 0 ' CROW F LI E S DISTAN C E 40' WALKING DISTANCE UP 5'-03/8"13'-05/8"2'-5"9'-0"9'-0"5'-2" 5'-0" SETBACK T.O. PLY. T.O. PLY. T.O. PLY. SCALE: 3/16" = 1'-0"1 TIA SITE PLAN 0 4'8'12' N DRAWING ISSUE DRAWN BY: PROJECT No:1907 CPF HPC APPLICATION 10/28/2022 | ASPEN CO1020 E. COOPER PROJECT119 South Spring St. | Suite 203 Aspen, CO 81611 T 970-925-3444 www.djarchitects.com A1.04 SITE PLAN | LANSCAPE PROPOSED | 3/16" All ideas, designs, arrangements and plans indicated or represented by this drawing are owned by and are the property of David Johnston Architects, PC and developed for use and in conjunction with the specified project. None of the ideas, designs, arrangements or plans shall be used by or disclosed for any purpose whatsoever without the written authorization of David Johnston Architects, PC. Sheet No. 5'-0"SETBACK5'-0"SETBACK 5'-0"SETBACK5'-0"2'-6" 2'-57/8" 7943'-33/8" 7944'-03/8" 7945'-93/8" ENTRY PORCH ENTRY PORCH EGRESS EGRESS EGRESS BIKES HISTORIC STRUCTURE/ ADDITION FOOTPRINT PROPOSED NEW APARTMENT FOOTPRINT PROPOSED TRASH ENCLOSURE FOOTPRINT STORAGE CL. PLANTING BED PLANTING BEDPLANTING BED PLANTING BED EXISTING TRANSFORMER LAWN TOP BACK OF CURB FLOWLINE OF CURB FOUND #5 REBAR .3' BELOW GRADE FOUND #5 REBAR & RED PLASTIC CAP PLS 336380.2' ABOVE GRADEELEV=7946.3 SET #5 REBAR & ORANGE PLASTIC CAP PLS 28643FLUSH WITH GRADEFOUND #4 REBAR & YELLOW PLASTIC CAP PLS 259470.2' BELOW GRADEELEV=7942.5 3.5'X8' ELECTRIC EASEMENT (BOOK 126 PAGE 7) NEW FENCE GATENEW FENCE GATE NEW WOOD FENCE DN UPPLANTING BEDDN UTILITY METERS LAWN LAWN PLANTING BEDPLANTING BED LILAC BUSHES LILAC BUSHES PLANTING BED PLANTING BEDEGRESS PROPERTY LINESETBACKSETBACK SETBACKE A S T C O O P E R A V E . EAST COOPER AVENUE CONCRETE SIDEWALK ASPHALT 2.5' METAL FENCE CONIFEROUSTREE10.8" X 21' COOPER AVE. VICTORIANCONDO ASSOC.PARCEL #2737182328021012 E. COOPER AVE.ASPEN, CO 81611 RIVERSIDECONDO ASSOC.PARCEL #2737181278011024 E. COOPER AVE.ASPEN, CO 81611PROPERTY LINEPROPERTY LINE PROPERTY LINE 4,379 SQ.FT.± OR 0.101 ACRES± SUBJECT PROPERTYPARCEL #2737182320061020 E. COOPER AVE.ASPEN, CO 81611 UP 9'-0"8'-10"4'-10"6"10'-0"19'-0"5'-0"5'-0" 5'-0" 2'-0"8'-0"6"4'-6"3'-0"5'-0"3'-0"3'-0"5'-0"3'-0" 5'-0" ENTRY PORCH BBQ NEW TRANSFORMER 3.5'X8' ELECTRIC EASEMENT (BOOK 126 PAGE 7) 2'X8' ELECTRIC EASEMENT (BOOK 126 PAGE 7) NEW BOLLARDS SETBACK SCALE: 3/16" = 1'-0"1 LANDSCAPE PLAN | PROPOSED | 3/16" 0 4'8'12' N DRAWING ISSUE DRAWN BY: PROJECT No:1907 CPF HPC APPLICATION 10/28/2022 | ASPEN CO1020 E. COOPER PROJECT119 South Spring St. | Suite 203 Aspen, CO 81611 T 970-925-3444 www.djarchitects.com A1.06 EXISTING MAIN LEVEL FLOOR PLAN | DEMOLITION All ideas, designs, arrangements and plans indicated or represented by this drawing are owned by and are the property of David Johnston Architects, PC and developed for use and in conjunction with the specified project. None of the ideas, designs, arrangements or plans shall be used by or disclosed for any purpose whatsoever without the written authorization of David Johnston Architects, PC. Sheet No.5'-01/2"35'-0"29'-61/4"40'-03/4"4 A2.01 EXTERIOR WALL TO BE REMOVED WALLS TO BE REMOVED REAR PORCH TO BE REMOVED 1 A2.01 1 A2.022 A2.02 SCALE: 3/16" = 1'-0"1 MAIN LEVEL DEMOLITION 0 4'8'12'SCALE: 3/16" = 1'-0"2 ROOF EXISTING PLAN 0 4'8'12' DRAWING ISSUE DRAWN BY: PROJECT No:1907 CPF HPC APPLICATION 10/28/2022 | ASPEN CO1020 E. COOPER PROJECT119 South Spring St. | Suite 203 Aspen, CO 81611 T 970-925-3444 www.djarchitects.com A1.08 LOWER/MAIN LEVEL FLOOR PLAN | PROPOSED All ideas, designs, arrangements and plans indicated or represented by this drawing are owned by and are the property of David Johnston Architects, PC and developed for use and in conjunction with the specified project. None of the ideas, designs, arrangements or plans shall be used by or disclosed for any purpose whatsoever without the written authorization of David Johnston Architects, PC. Sheet No.WW3'-0"3'-0"3'-0"3'-0"3'-0"3'-0"5'-0"5'-0"5'-0"5'-0"T.O. CONC.88'-6" T.O. PLY.86'-7" F.F.@88'-63/4" T.O. CONC.88'-6" F.F.@86'-73/4" EXISTING TREE TO REMAIN- 10' DRIPLINE SEWER EJECTOR DRYWELL CRAWLSPACE/MECH.CRAWLSPACE/MECH./WATERCRAWLSPACE2 A2.02 4 A2.01DR DRDRWLAUNDRY CL. CL. BEDROOM BEDROOM BATHBATH BEDROOM BATH CL. BEDROOM BEDROOM BATH BATH CL.LAUNDRY CL. EGRESS WELL EGRESS WELL MECHANICAL UNIT #102 STORAGE UNIT #103 STORAGE EGRESS WELL STORAGE UP UP LAUNDRY BEDROOM CL. LIVING BATH EGRESS WELL 1 A2.01 1 A2.02 2 A2.01 3 A2.01 DW RG RG10'-0"5'-0"5'-0"5'-0"19'-0"97'-6" 98'-3" 100'-0" F.F.@98'-33/4" F.F.@100'-03/4" F.F.@ 97'-63/4" 2 A2.02 4 A2.01 EXISTING TREE TO REMAIN- 10' DRIPLINE CRAWL ACCESSPROPERTY LINESETBACKSETBACK SETBACKPROPERTY LINEPROPERTY LINE PROPERTY LINE STORAGE CLS. 103 REF REF DW REF DWRG UP 5'-01/2"13'-03/4"2'-5"9'-0"9'-0"5'-2" 5'-0" 1 A2.01 1 A2.02 2 A2.01 3 A2.01 SETBACK LIVING BATH KITCHEN DINING BATH KITCHEN DINING POWDER LIVING LIVING CL. CL. ENTRY PORCH ENTRY PORCH STORAGE CL. BEDROOM DINING UP DN DN DN CL. BEDROOM KITCHEN CL. T.O. PLY. T.O. PLY. T.O. PLY. TRASH AREA 104 STAIR 105 SCALE: 3/16" = 1'-0"-1 LOWER LEVEL PROPOSED 0 4'8'12'SCALE: 3/16" = 1'-0"1 MAIN LEVEL PROPOSED 0 4'8'12' DRAWING ISSUE DRAWN BY: PROJECT No:1907 CPF HPC APPLICATION 10/28/2022 | ASPEN CO1020 E. COOPER PROJECT119 South Spring St. | Suite 203 Aspen, CO 81611 T 970-925-3444 www.djarchitects.com A1.09 SECOND/THIRD LEVEL FLOOR PLAN | PROPOSED All ideas, designs, arrangements and plans indicated or represented by this drawing are owned by and are the property of David Johnston Architects, PC and developed for use and in conjunction with the specified project. None of the ideas, designs, arrangements or plans shall be used by or disclosed for any purpose whatsoever without the written authorization of David Johnston Architects, PC. Sheet No. DW RG2 A2.02 4 A2.015'-0"5'-0"5'-0"PROPERTY LINESETBACKSETBACK SETBACKPROPERTY LINEPROPERTY LINE PROPERTY LINE DRW REF 1 A2.01 1 A2.02 2 A2.01 3 A2.01 5'-0" SETBACK LAUNDRY BEDROOM BATH CL. CL. CL. CL. BEDROOM BATH DN OPEN TO BELOW CL. BEDROOM STORAGE LOFT BEDROOM KITCHEN LIVING DINING BATH UNIT #201 STORAGE UNIT #201 ATTIC STORAGE DECK SCALE: 3/16" = 1'-0"2 SECOND LEVEL PROPOSED 0 4'8'12' DRAWING ISSUE DRAWN BY: PROJECT No:1907 CPF HPC APPLICATION 10/28/2022 | ASPEN CO1020 E. COOPER PROJECT119 South Spring St. | Suite 203 Aspen, CO 81611 T 970-925-3444 www.djarchitects.com A1.10 ROOF PLAN All ideas, designs, arrangements and plans indicated or represented by this drawing are owned by and are the property of David Johnston Architects, PC and developed for use and in conjunction with the specified project. None of the ideas, designs, arrangements or plans shall be used by or disclosed for any purpose whatsoever without the written authorization of David Johnston Architects, PC. Sheet No. 2 A2.02 4 A2.01 SNOW FENCE STANDING SEAM STANDING SEAM STANDING SEAM ASPHALT SHINGLE SNOW FENCESNOW FENCE SNOW FENCE 1 A2.01 1 A2.02 2 A2.01 3 A2.01 CEDAR SHINGLE ROOF TO BE REPLACED SNOW FENCE SNOW FENCE GALV. GUTTER GALV. GUTTERGALV. GUTTER GALV. GUTTER GALV. GUTTER GALV. GUTTER CEDAR SHINGLE ROOF TO BE REPLACED10 : 1210 : 1210 : 12 10 : 12 3 : 12 3 : 12EXISTING ROOF BELOW 10 : 12 NEW SHED DORMER METAL STANDING SEAM NEW SHED ROOF SCALE: 3/16" = 1'-0"1 ROOF PLAN 0 4'8'12' DRAWING ISSUE DRAWN BY: PROJECT No:1907 CPF HPC APPLICATION 10/28/2022 | ASPEN CO1020 E. COOPER PROJECT119 South Spring St. | Suite 203 Aspen, CO 81611 T 970-925-3444 www.djarchitects.com A2.01 ELEVATIONS All ideas, designs, arrangements and plans indicated or represented by this drawing are owned by and are the property of David Johnston Architects, PC and developed for use and in conjunction with the specified project. None of the ideas, designs, arrangements or plans shall be used by or disclosed for any purpose whatsoever without the written authorization of David Johnston Architects, PC. Sheet No. MAIN LEVEL 100'-0" SECOND LEVEL 108'-0"16'-03/4"EXISTING TREE TO REMAIN METAL STANDING SEAM SNOW FENCE SHUTTER SYSTEM VERTICAL RECLAIMED SIDING GALV. W FLANGE BEAM METAL SIDINGNEW BOLLARDS NEW TRANSFORMER 6' FENCE- TRASH AREA UTILITIES/ METERS BEYOND ASPHALT SHINGLE SNOW FENCESNOW FENCE GALV. GUTTER & DOWNSPOUT MAIN LEVEL 100'-0" SECOND LEVEL 108'-0"15'-63/4"SEE ELEVATION 3/A2.01 NEW PROFILED WOOD COLUMNS NEW WOOD PICKET FENCE FRONT YARD ONLY WOOD SOFFIT BOARDS @ PORCH WOOD SHAKE ROOFING WOOD FASCIA BOARD COLOR PENDING APPROVED MOCK-UP BY HPC. EXISTING ROOF STRUCTURE TO REMAIN RESHINGLE WITH WOOD SHAKE ROOF EXISTING NON-HISTORIC WINDOWS AND DOORS TO BE REMOVED AND REPLACED EXISTING STRUCTURE TO BE RECLAD IN ORIGINAL 4" HORIZONTAL CEDAR LAP SIDING NEW GALV. DOWNSPOUT NEW GALV. HALF- ROUND GUTTER MAIN LEVEL 100'-0" MAIN LEVEL 100'-0" SECOND LEVEL 108'-0" SECOND LEVEL 108'-0"20'-6"SNOW FENCE STANDING SEAM SNOW FENCE ASHPHALT SHINGLE EXISTING TREE TO REMAIN STEEL GUARDRAIL W/ WOOD CAP GALV. GUTTERS & DOWNSPOUTS METAL SIDNG VERTICAL RECLAIMED SIDING 6' FENCE- TRASH AREA BBQ BIKE RACK HORIZONTAL 6" LAP SIDING MAIN LEVEL 100'-0" MAIN LEVEL 100'-0" SECOND LEVEL 108'-0" SECOND LEVEL 108'-0"1'-21/2"1'-4"METAL ROOFING- STANDING SEAM WOOD SHAKE ROOFING WOOD FASCIA BOARD COLOR PENDING APPROVED MOCK-UP BY HPC. NEW SHED DORMER ROOF WITH METAL-STANDING SEAM NEW WINDOWS EXISTING STRUCTURE TO BE RECLAD IN ORIGINAL 4" HORIZONTAL CEDAR LAP SIDING SNOW FENCE GALV. GUTTER & DOWNSPOUT STEEL GUARDRAIL W/ WOOD CAP FLUES SCALE: 1/4" = 1'-0"2 NORTH ELEVATION 0 2'4'8' SCALE: 1/4" = 1'-0"1 SOUTH ELEVATION 0 2'4'8'SCALE: 1/4" = 1'-0"3 AUX. SOUTH ELEVATION 0 2'4'8' SCALE: 1/4" = 1'-0"4 AUX. NORTH ELEVATION 0 2'4'8' DRAWING ISSUE DRAWN BY: PROJECT No:1907 CPF HPC APPLICATION 10/28/2022 | ASPEN CO1020 E. COOPER PROJECT119 South Spring St. | Suite 203 Aspen, CO 81611 T 970-925-3444 www.djarchitects.com A2.02 ELEVATIONS All ideas, designs, arrangements and plans indicated or represented by this drawing are owned by and are the property of David Johnston Architects, PC and developed for use and in conjunction with the specified project. None of the ideas, designs, arrangements or plans shall be used by or disclosed for any purpose whatsoever without the written authorization of David Johnston Architects, PC. Sheet No. MAIN LEVEL 100'-0" MAIN LEVEL 100'-0" SECOND LEVEL 108'-0" SECOND LEVEL 108'-0"20'-81/2"16'-11/2"23'-81/2"8"1'-1"STANDING SEAM NEW PROFILED WOOD COLUMNS WOOD BOARD SIDING. COLOR PENDING APPROVED MOCK-UP BY HPC. WOOD SHAKE ROOFING WOOD FASCIA BOARD COLOR PENDING APPROVED MOCK-UP BY HPC. ASHPHALT SHINGLE EXISTING TREE TO REMAIN GALV. GUARDRAIL METAL SIDNG NEW SHED DORMER METAL STANDING SEAM GALV. SNOWFENCE FLUES FLUES HORIZONTAL 6" LAP SIDING VERTICAL RECLAIMED SIDING GALV. W FLANGE BEAM NEW TRANSFORMER6' FENCE- TRASH AREA GALV. W FLANGE COLUMN 0" MAIN LEVEL 0" MAIN LEVEL 8'-0" SECOND LEVEL 8'-0" SECOND LEVEL 16'-47/8"10'-01/4"23'-81/2"1'-4"8"NEW SQUARE WOOD COLUMNS WOOD BOARD SIDING. COLOR PENDING APPROVED MOCK-UP BY HPC. WOOD SHAKE ROOFING WOOD FASCIA BOARD COLOR PENDING APPROVED MOCK-UP BY HPC. NEW SHED DORMER METAL STANDING SEAM FLUES FLUES ASPHALT SHINGLE SHUTTER SYSTEM VERTICAL RECLAIMED SIDING SHUTTER SYSTEM METAL SIDING HORIZONTAL 6" LAP SIDING SNOW FENCE SNOW FENCE GALV. GUTTER & DOWNSPOUT GALV. GUTTER & DOWNSPOUT GALV. GUTTER & DOWNSPOUT GALV. GUTTER & DOWNSPOUT SCALE: 1/4" = 1'-0"1 EAST ELEVATION 0 2'4'8' SCALE: 1/4" = 1'-0"2 WEST ELEVATION 0 2'4'8' DRAWING ISSUE DRAWN BY: PROJECT No:1907 CPF HPC APPLICATION 10/28/2022 | ASPEN CO1020 E. COOPER PROJECT119 South Spring St. | Suite 203 Aspen, CO 81611 T 970-925-3444 www.djarchitects.com A2.03 PROPOSED MATERIALS All ideas, designs, arrangements and plans indicated or represented by this drawing are owned by and are the property of David Johnston Architects, PC and developed for use and in conjunction with the specified project. None of the ideas, designs, arrangements or plans shall be used by or disclosed for any purpose whatsoever without the written authorization of David Johnston Architects, PC. Sheet No. GALVANIZED METAL SIDING (VINTAGE COLOR) GALVANIZED METAL SIDING (RUNNING BOND LAYUP)GALVANIZED METAL SIDING (CORNER DETAIL) EXTERIOR MATERIALS ASPHALT SHINGLE ROOFING (WEATHERED WOOD) TYPICAL SHUTTER-4" RELCAIMED WOODVERTICAL SIDING-6" RELCAIMED WOOD HORIZONTAL SIDING-4" LAP SIDING METAL STANDING SEAM ROOFING PROPOSED STRUCTURE (UPPER ENTRY PORCH) PROPOSED STRUCTURE (WEST ELEVATION) EXTERIOR SCONCE (MATTE BLACK) DRAWING ISSUE DRAWN BY: PROJECT No:1907 CPF HPC APPLICATION 10/28/2022 | ASPEN CO1020 E. COOPER PROJECT119 South Spring St. | Suite 203 Aspen, CO 81611 T 970-925-3444 www.djarchitects.com A2.04 PROPOSED MATERIALS All ideas, designs, arrangements and plans indicated or represented by this drawing are owned by and are the property of David Johnston Architects, PC and developed for use and in conjunction with the specified project. None of the ideas, designs, arrangements or plans shall be used by or disclosed for any purpose whatsoever without the written authorization of David Johnston Architects, PC. Sheet No. HORIZONTAL SIDING-4" LAP SIDING WOOD TRIM COLOR (ROCK GARDEN) STANDING SEAM METAL ROOFING (CHARCOAL) EXTERIOR MATERIALS WOOD TRIM COLOR (GREENBLACK) WOOD SIDING COLOR (COTTON) ROOF SHINGLES (LIVE OAK) BASE METAL (MATCH WOOD TRIM GREENBLACK COLOR)PAVER COLOR (SIERRA GREY) DOOR COLOR (SUNFLOWER) HISTORIC STRUCTURE ENTRY PORCH (SOUTH ELEVATION) HISTORIC STRUCTURE ENTRY PORCH (WEST ELEVATION) DRAWING ISSUE DRAWN BY: PROJECT No:1907 CPF HPC APPLICATION 10/28/2022 | ASPEN CO1020 E. COOPER PROJECT119 South Spring St. | Suite 203 Aspen, CO 81611 T 970-925-3444 www.djarchitects.com A2.05 PROPOSED DETAILS All ideas, designs, arrangements and plans indicated or represented by this drawing are owned by and are the property of David Johnston Architects, PC and developed for use and in conjunction with the specified project. None of the ideas, designs, arrangements or plans shall be used by or disclosed for any purpose whatsoever without the written authorization of David Johnston Architects, PC. Sheet No.1'-33/8"6'-11"11/2"6"11/2" 1 1/4" X 3 1/2" WOOD CASING APRON DETAIL 6X6 WOOD COLUMN 9X9 METAL CLAD COLUMN BASE 2" 1 1/4" X 3 1/2" WOOD CASING 1 1/4" X 3 1/2" WOOD SILL 1 1/4" X 3 1/2" WOOD APRON PAINTED WOOD DOUBLE HUNG 2"43/4"11/4"3/4" SHEET METAL SKIRT WATER TABLE- SKIRT BOARD WATER TABLE- CAP BOARD GRADE ELEVATION VARIES CLAPBOARD SIDING51/2"CEDAR SHAKE ROOF 1 1/4" X 6 3/4" FASCIA BOARD 1X4 T&G SOFFIT DRIP FLASHING 2'-41/2"2'-6"3"11/2" 3"2'-7"3" TYPICAL WINDOW ELEVATION (DETAILS) HISTORIC STRUCTURE ENTRY PORCH (SOUTH ELEVATION) HISTORIC STRUCTURE ENTRY PORCH (WEST ELEVATION) EXTERIOR MATERIALS WEST PORCH ELEVATION (DETAILS) COLUMN DETAIL EXTERIOR SCONCE (MATTE BLACK) A: 5 1/2" B: 6'-8" C: 2'-7" WATER TABLE DETAIL TYPICAL PORCH ROOF EAVE (DETAILS)TYPICAL FENCE & GATE DRAWING ISSUE DRAWN BY: PROJECT No:1907 CPF HPC APPLICATION 10/28/2022 | ASPEN CO1020 E. COOPER PROJECT119 South Spring St. | Suite 203 Aspen, CO 81611 T 970-925-3444 www.djarchitects.com HP-1 HISTORIC PRESERVATION ELEVATIONS All ideas, designs, arrangements and plans indicated or represented by this drawing are owned by and are the property of David Johnston Architects, PC and developed for use and in conjunction with the specified project. None of the ideas, designs, arrangements or plans shall be used by or disclosed for any purpose whatsoever without the written authorization of David Johnston Architects, PC. Sheet No. MAIN LEVEL 100'-0" SECOND LEVEL 108'-0" EXISTING ROOF STRUCTURE TO REMAIN RESHINGLE WITH WOOD SHAKE ROOF EXISTING PORCH ROOF STRUCTURE TO BE REMOVED EXISTING STRUCTURE TO BE RECLAD IN ORIGINAL 4" HORIZONTAL CEDAR LAP SIDING EXISTING NON-HISTORIC WINDOWS AND DOORS TO BE REMOVED EXISTING ROOF STRUCTURE TO REMAIN RESHINGLE WITH WOOD SHAKE ROOF EXISTING NON-HISTORIC WINDOWS AND DOORS TO BE REMOVED AND REPLACED EXISTING STRUCTURE TO BE RECLAD IN ORIGINAL 4" HORIZONTAL CEDAR LAP SIDING EXISTING ROOF STRUCTURE TO REMAIN RESHINGLE WITH WOOD SHAKE ROOF EXISTING STRUCTURE TO BE RECLAD IN ORIGINAL 4" HORIZONTAL CEDAR LAP SIDING EXISTING REAR PORCH TO BE REMOVED EXISTING NON-HISTORIC WINDOWS TO BE REMOVED EXISTING ROOF STRUCTURE TO REMAIN RESHINGLE WITH WOOD SHAKE ROOF EXISTING STRUCTURE TO BE RECLAD IN ORIGINAL 4" HORIZONTAL CEDAR LAP SIDING EXISTING REAR PORCH TO BE REMOVED EXISTING NON-HISTORIC WINDOWS TO BE REMOVED SCALE: 1/4" = 1'-0"2 NORTH ELEVATION: HP PLAN 0 2'4'8' SCALE: 1/4" = 1'-0"1 SOUTH ELEVATION: HP PLAN 0 2'4'8'SCALE: 1/4" = 1'-0"1 EAST ELEVATION: HP PLAN 0 2'4'8' SCALE: 1/4" = 1'-0"2 WEST ELEVATION: HP PLAN 0 2'4'8' DALLAS Black Walnut Rustic Black For more information on shingle color selection tips and available colors by zip code, visit tamko.com SHINGLE COLOR SELECTION TIPS View An Actual Roof Installation. Shingles may look different installed on a roof compared to viewing only one shingle. Also, shingle colors can appear differently during different times of day, in different amounts of sunlight (full, partial, etc.). Start your Color Search with Brochures and Visualization Programs. The printed colors you see in any brochure or digital visualization program are only as accurate as current printing and digital technology allows. Check Your Shingles Before Installation. TAMKO is not responsible for color claims where the wrong color is installed on a roof. It is better to be safe and perform a final in-person check of the shingles to confirm product and color before they are installed. View Actual Shingles. Viewing actual shingles is the only way to see all the nuances in color that will be represented on your roof once the project is complete. With two distinct color palettes to choose from, TAMKO has just the right color to beautify your home. WHATEVER YOUR TASTE OR STYLE,TAMKO HAS YOU COVERED. For those who prefer a softer, more even- toned look for their roof, choose one of TAMKO’s Classic Colors featuring the subtle, sophisticated color blends that have long made TAMKO an industry favorite. America’s Natural Colors bring the vibrant tones of the American landscape to your home. If you want your roof to make a bold and beautiful visual statement, choose from America’s Natural Colors. SUBTLE AND SOPHISTICATED BOLD AND BEAUTIFUL The shingle images above show the difference between America’s Natural Colors and Classic Colors. Black Walnut and Rustic Black are both “black” shingles. Look closely and you can see Black Walnut includes vibrant splashes of color that will draw the eye of the roof. WHY CHOOSE TAMKO HERITAGE® SHINGLES? With more than 75 years of roofing manufacturing, TAMKO Building Products LLC is one of the largest and most trusted manufacturers of asphalt shingles in the nation. Every year, thousands of homeowners choose TAMKO shingles for their roofs, and many of those roofs are covered with Heritage architectural asphalt shingles – TAMKO’s most popular product. For more than 40 years, Heritage shingles have been a classic in the roofing industry, recommended by contractors, builders and homeowners for their quality construction, Limited Lifetime Warranty, beautiful woodshake cut, and the best colors available in the market. PROLONG Ventilation and Hip & Ridge Shingles Finish your job off right with crucial roof ventilation that can help prolong the life of your roof, while capping it all off with hip and ridge shingles to protect the most vulnerable ridges and provide a beautiful, finished look for the entire project. PERFORM Shingles Choose the performance you need for your roofing job from TAMKO’s inclusive line of asphalt shingles. Whatever your job calls for, TAMKO has your shingle. HERITAGE® • VINTAGE® • TITAN XT™ STORMFIGHTER IR™ • ELITE GLASS-SEAL® *Learn more about the requirements for an extended Full Start® period by upgrading to a TAMKO WXTShield Enhanced System Warranty™ at www.tamko.com/enhancedwarranties. TAMKO COMPLETE™ PROTECT | PERFORM | PROLONG Insist on TAMKO® products for the full TAMKO Complete™ Roof System. TAMKO products are specifically designed to work together, building layer upon layer of protection. PROTECT Waterproofing, Underlayments and Starter Shingles Give your roof a great foundation with the right products and application considering your local and state building codes. Harvest Gold Mountain Slate Harvest Gold Mountain Slate Mountain Slate Black Walnut Black Walnut Painted Desert Painted Desert Rustic Slate Weathered Wood Olde English Pewter Rustic Slate RATED PRODUCT Olde English Pewter Weathered Wood Oxford GreyOxford Grey Rustic Hickory Rustic HickoryRustic Black Rustic Cedar Rustic Black Rustic Cedar ©2022 TAMKO Building Products LLC SHINGLES BEGIN TO AGE AS SOON AS THEY ARE EXPOSED TO NATURE. BUILDINGS EXPERIENCE AGING FACTORS DIFFERENTLY, SO IT IS DIFFICULT TO PREDICT HOW LONG SHINGLES WILL LAST. TAMKO PROVIDES A LIMITED WARRANTY FOR MANY PRODUCTS, THAT INCLUDES A BINDING ARBITRATION CLAUSE AND OTHER TERMS AND CONDITIONS WHICH ARE INCORPORATED HEREIN BY REFERENCE. YOU MAY OBTAIN A COPY OF THE LIMITED WARRANTY AT TAMKO.COM OR BY CALLING 1-800-641-4691. DALLAS 41001575 0522 Certain colors and products may not be available in your area. Information included in this item was current at the time of printing. To obtain a copy of the most current version of this item, visit us online at tamko.com or call us at 1-800-641-4691. AMERICA’S SHINGLE™ IS YOUR HERITAGE. We are proud of our Heritage – More than 75 years of U.S. manufacturing, family-owned, founded in the heartland of America. With a long history of vertical integration to control the quality of our raw materials, at TAMKO, we think better materials make better shingles. And it’s not just an advanced proprietary mix of fiberglass mat, asphalt and ceramic granules that go into our shingles – our support for veterans, first responders, our communities and our employees means you can feel good about choosing a TAMKO® Heritage® shingle – America’s Shingle™. 1-800-641-4691 tamko.com Heritage shingles meet the following classifications UL Listed for: Class A Fire Resistance UL Classified: Wind Resistance ASTM D3462 and ICC-ES Acceptance Criteria AC438 UL Evaluation Reports: UL Evaluation Report ER2919-01 UL Evaluation Report ER2919-02 Tested in Compliance with: UL 790/ASTM E 108, Class A ASTM D3161, Class F ASTM D7158, Class H ASTM D3462 ICC-ES Acceptance Criteria AC438 Florida Building Code Product Approval FL 18355 FL 35321 Miami-Dade County Product Control Approved Olde English Pewter is listed by the Cool Roof Rating Council® (CRRC) FULL-LINE PRODUCT COLLECTION 2 | AlluraUSA.com Beyond the appeal of the products. For more than 75 years, Allura has been building its enviable reputation by Making the Material Difference — focusing on the things that make a real difference for our customers. We begin by providing service through a team of professionals dedicated to exceeding your expectations. We’re adamant about ensuring you get the right material in the right location at the right time. To do so, we offer a full line of building materials that deliver the distinctive look and unsurpassed performance you demand. Unlike wood, vinyl and other traditional building materials, Allura Fiber Cement products resist damage from hail or termite attacks, resist rot, are noncombustible, and are free from manufacturing defects. They are also suitable in both hot and cold climates and are fire resistant. What’s more, Allura products feature realistic wood grain and textures, come in an incredible array of colors and are paintable for unlimited design possibilities. When it comes to the natural look you want with none of the hassles, Allura fiber cement products are all you need. • Durable, engineered to endure harsh weather and high-wind climates • Noncombustible, Class A fire rating • Superior aesthetics • Factory pre-primed • Distinctive, more realistic textures • 30-year limited warranty • Best ROI for homeowners* for 8 years in a row * According to Remodeling Cost vs Value Report AlluraUSA.com | 3 Weather-resistantRot-resistantTermite-resistantImpact-resistant Noncombustible LAP SIDING 4 | AlluraUSA.com Combining the appearance and workability of wood with the durability of specially formulated fi ber cement, Allura Lap Siding not only looks great but lasts considerably longer than traditi onal exterior wall cladding or vinyl siding. DESIGNER’S CORNER Our Traditi onal Cedar texture features a deep, realisti c wood grain appearance for an unbeatable classic style, while the Smooth texture creates a cleaner, modern aestheti c. You can even customize your design uti lizing our extensive range of widths. No matt er the style, Allura Lap Siding has got yours covered. Traditi onal Cedar Smooth AVAILABLE TEXTURES * * 1¼" min. overlap with all Lap Siding. Check market availability, as products may vary. Thickness Width Length Exposure 5 ̸16"5¼"12'4" 5 ̸16"6¼"12'5" 5 ̸16""7¼"12’6" 5 ̸16"8¼"12’7" 5 ̸16"9¼"12’8" 5 ̸16"12"12’10¾” AlluraUSA.com | 5 Classic style. State-of- the-art performance. LAP SIDING* 6 | AlluraUSA.com PANEL SIDING Designed for everything from sidewalls to overhead accents, Allura Panel Siding adds beauti fully versati le — and exceedingly durable — disti ncti on to your next project. TECHNICAL SPECIFICATIONS Traditi onal Cedar Smooth 8” OC Groove AVAILABLE TEXTURES * Thickness Width Length 5 ̸16"4'8' 5 ̸16"4'9' 5 ̸16"4'10’ 5 ̸16"4'12’ AlluraUSA.com | 7 Versati lity that spans traditi onal to contemporary. * Check market availability, as products may vary. Random Square – Straight Edge Half Rounds Random Square – Staggered Edge Octagons Random Square – Straight Edge Half Rounds Random Square – Staggered Edge Octagons 8 | AlluraUSA.com SHAKE Replacing split or rotted wood shingles is a thing of the past thanks to Allura Shake. Featuring the natural beauty of cedar, our Shake provide the appearance of wood without the wear and tear, ideal for everything from small facades to large areas to full wall applications. What’s more, our Shake achieves the look of individual shingles in easy-to-install panels. To elevate the authenticity even further, opt for Allura Shake Select, the innovative interlocking 3-panel system that minimizes repeating patterns to deliver a truly random aesthetic. All of which deliver a lot of extra curb appeal without a lot of extra work. * Check market availability, as products may vary. AlluraUSA.com | 9 Allura Shake* Thickness Dimensions Exposure ¼" 16" x 48" 6" The undeniable allure of texture and detail. STAGGERED EDGE Thickness Dimensions Exposure ¼" 16" x 48" 7" ¼" 12" x 48" 5" STRAIGHT EDGE • Primed only • Two textures: Traditional Cedar & Combed Thickness Dimensions Exposure ¼" 16" x 48" 7" HALF ROUNDS & OCTAGON DESIGNER’S CORNER When it comes to creativity and versatility, Allura Shake is all you need to establish a look that’s all your own. Whether you prefer the classic Straight Edge look, the “randomness” of Staggered Edge or the decorative possibilities of our Half Round, Allura Shake makes your design ideas come alive. Random Square – Staggered EdgeRandom Square – Straight Edge 10 | AlluraUSA.com SHAKE SELECT It’s possible to achieve the look of handcraft ed randomly placed shake shingle siding without actually installing individual shake shingles, one by one. Allura’s Shake Select siding achieves the truly disti ncti ve look once only possible with individual cedar shingles with a fi ber cement product that’s unsurpassed in its ability to stand up to the harshest weather, wood-devouring insects or whatever else Mother Nature throws its way. Half RoundsOctagons AlluraUSA.com | 11 Innovati ve design for random beauty. * Check market availability, as products may vary. Thickness Dimensions Exposure 5 ̸16" 16" x 48" 7" • Available in Straight Edge & Staggered Edge • Traditi onal Cedar texture • Available in Factory Prefi nished & Primed Allura Shake Select* DESIGNER’S CORNER A repeati ng patt ern is the last thing you want to see when standing on the curb looking at one of your fi nished homes. Allura has overcome this annoyance through an ingenious, one-of-a-kind system that uti lizes a series of three disti nct 4’ X 8’ panels and an intuiti ve installati on sequence. With Allura Random Shake, installers can knock out 4’ X 8’ secti ons in a fracti on of the ti me it would take to place individual shingles over that same surface area. Allura Shake Select is truly unique, delivering the look of old world craft smanship in a beauti ful new way. 12 | AlluraUSA.com TRIM Thanks to our special fi ber cement formulati on, Allura Trim has all the advantages of wood and none of the hassles. It looks like wood yet is incredibly durable. It won’t rot, warp or splinter and is designed to signifi cantly outperform wood in every way. Best of all, there is no need for special tools on the job site. Our Trim can be cut with the same saw blades and installed with the same tools normally used for wood products. Why bother with wood? Trim provides the look and long-lasti ng protecti on you need to bring your home that all-important fi nishing touch. TRIM FEATURES • Available in reversible Cedar/Smooth board for added versati lity • 15-year limited warranty DESIGNER’S CORNER Nothing brings the look of your home together quite like Allura Trim. Its clean lines, excepti onal durability and paintability provide the ulti mate in beauty and versati lity. Allura Trim is the perfect fi nishing touch. Industry-leading 15-year Transferable Trim Limited Warranty All available in 12-ft . lengths *Check market availability, as products may vary. Tie it all together. AlluraUSA.com | 13 Nominal Width* Size Thickness 2" 3" 4" 5" 6" 8" 10" 12" 7̸16"7 ̸16" 4/4 ¾" 5/4 1" 8/4 1½" 14 | AlluraUSA.com SOFFIT Available in both vented and non-vented styles, Allura Soffi t Panels will neither warp nor rot. Unlike traditi onal wood, they are engineered to repel moisture, withstand any climate, and provide extensive protecti on around the home. Soffi t helps equalize the roof temperature from top to bott om by supplying a consistent airfl ow along the enti re underside of the roof deck. For outdoor ceiling applicati ons, including porches and gazebos. Allura Fiber Cement Beadboard is perfect. Best of all, it’s weather-, rot- and fi re-resistant. Raise your expectati ons for any outdoor ceiling with the aestheti cs and durability of Allura Beadboard. Elevate the look and performance. EAVES SPECIFICATIONS Traditi onal Cedar Traditional Cedar Vented Beadboard (only available for Ceiling Soffi t) Smooth Smooth Vented DESIGNER’S CORNER Whether you prefer Smooth or Cedar texture, Allura Soffi t opti ons allow you to ensure your home’s design style is consistent from every angle. * Check market availability, as products may vary. AVAILABLE TEXTURES * Type Thickness Width Length Vented/Non-Vented ¼" 24" 8' Vented/Non-Vented ¼" 24" 12' Vented/Non-Vented ¼" 16" 12' Vented/Non-Vented ¼" 12" 12' Type Thickness Width Length Non-Vented ¼" 4' 8' Beadboard 5⁄16" 4' 8' CEILING SPECIFICATIONS AlluraUSA.com | 15 16 | AlluraUSA.com PRE-FINISHED Opt for pre-finished fiber cement siding to build in quality and durability. Unlike retail paint made from a clear base tinted with synthetic pigments, the paint formulated for fiber cement manufacturers uses natural color pigments, which are renowned for their superior durability, coverage, stability and resistance to fading. (Ancient cave drawings used natural pigments, and they haven’t disappeared after 30,000 years.) Pre-painted siding from Allura is guaranteed for 15 years — up to twice the durability of an on-site application. ALWAYS THE RIGHT CONDITIONS Paint will never apply with the same consistency and control on a vertical surface in outdoor conditions as it will in a cutting-edge painting facility. Not only is pre-painted siding application more consistent, but the coating is also thicker. Moisture can prevent paint adherence to virtually any substrate. For best results, painters should delay for 24-hours after any precipitation and should avoid application altogether within 4 hours before forecasted rain. Additionally, most paint labels recommend painting when the relative humidity is between 40-60%, but in many areas around the United States, the humidity almost never drops below 60%. When temperatures outside are too high or too low, painting the building’s siding is also problematic. To create a durable film, the air temperature must be over 35° and lower than 90°. But weather is never a problem in the factory, where painting conditions are perfect 365 days a year. DESIGNER’S CORNER Would you prefer to have a new car delivered with just the primer applied? Imagine trying to match that factory finish out in your driveway. When a product is finished in a controlled factory setting with specially formulated coatings, it delivers unrivaled results. It’s that simple. Build in more durability with pre-painted fiber cement. AlluraUSA.com | 17 The color samples shown here are as accurate as printi ng methods will permit. For a physical color card, a request form or to fi nd a preferred dealer near you, please visit AlluraUSA.com. Unleash your imaginati on. 18 | AlluraUSA.com Allura’s proprietary Spectrum™ Finishing System not only ensures unparalleled protecti on against the elements, but also brings out your style in a gorgeous palett e of eye-catching designer colors. But that’s only part of the story. Beneath our alluring Spectrum fi nish lies a strong precision process. Opti mal defense is built in with our primer/sealer for premium weather protecti on and machine-applied coats of Spectrum color. With 25 solid colors available to choose from our Spectrum pre-painted collecti on, your homeowner can rest assured knowing they won't need to repaint for 15 years. We back this claim up with a 15-year warranty on all our pre-fi nished opti ons. Or if you have a special request beyond our existi ng samples, you can create your own custom look with our Spectrum Plus™ curated collecti on. This off ers a palett e of beauti ful colors reserved exclusively for your use in your market. Contact your Allura sales representati ve for more details on both of these customized programs to determine what best fi ts your needs. Snow Desert Tan Caramelized Pears Linen Sterling Gray Savannah Wicker Ashen Natural Clay Rock Cliff s Granite Gray Pewter Olive Gray Heron Red Rock Falls Heartstone Cool Charcoal Pacifi c Blue Sable Brown Plunge Pool Knight’s Armor Bark Autumn Red CavalryTaupe Flagstone We don’t just promise world-class service. We guarantee it. At Allura, we believe the building industry is fi rst and foremost a service industry. We understand ti me is money and you deserve respectf ul, courteous and knowledgeable customer service. So you can always count on us for helpful technical support, customer service reps and managers who are eager to assist you with all your Allura fi ber cement needs. ON-TIME SHIPMENTS We take pride in delivering full and on-ti me shipments. If for any reason your direct Allura order does not ship on your promised ship date, please contact Allura’s Customer Support immediately, so we can assist you. QUALITY PRODUCTS & PROTECTED INVESTMENT With over 75 years of experience, Allura provides a top-line fi ber cement product using our advanced formulati on and quality-control monitoring. Every piece of fi ber cement product delivered from Allura will be palleti zed and wrapped to protect your investment. BACKED BY CONFIDENCE. Allura fi ber cement siding products are backed by our 30-year Transferable Limited Product Warranty*. *Please review our Limited Transferable Warranty for specifi c details. Use of the product subjects you to a Limited Warranty and Arbitrati on Agreement. For a copy and further details, visit Allurausa.com/warranti es. AlluraUSA.com | 19 BACKED BY CONFIDENCE. Allura fi ber cement siding products are backed by our 30-year Transferable Limited Product Warranty*. *Please review our Limited Transferable Warranty for specifi c details. Use of the product subjects you to a Limited Warranty and Arbitrati on Agreement. For a copy and further details, visit Allurausa.com/warranti es. AlluraUSA.com 396 West Greens Road, Suite 300 • Houston, Texas 77067 • (844) 4.ALLURA (844) 425.5872 © 12/21 Allura. Printed in U.S.A. Lap Siding Soffi t Panel Siding Panel Shake Trim Beadboard Shake Select Inspired Design Beautifully Crafted Builder: PureHaven Homes Architect: Habitations Design Group Interior Designer: PureHaven Homes Photographer: Miles Minno Available with FeelSafe™ impact rated glazing. ___ H3® Single & Double Hung ___ 61 High Value Meets High Performance. The qualities that make our H3 double hung windows exceptional add up fast. The advanced Fusion Technology™ is the perfect integration of extruded aluminum, vinyl and wood. Its patented design and construction give it an industry-leading seal against the elements. Add to this a continuous head and sill for water-tight mull joints when putting units together and amazingly easy installation, and you’ll understand why it has become a favorite for many. Easy Is Good Lever-action locks are designed to be easy to operate. Easy-tilt latches make your H3 double hung windows easy to clean. Patented H3 Accessory Frame This frame cladding profile system comes in four available profiles that snap in place on the frame with a clip system. No through-frame anchors or excessive nail holes, leaving you an integrated frame that gives homeowners the flexibility to choose the aesthetic they want. H3® Hardware Finishes Matte Black White Oil Rubbed Forever Bronze ChestnutBronze Bronze Champagne Satin Nickel Brushed Chrome Polished Chrome* Antique Brass* Bright Brass* 60 2” Flat Casing 3.5” Flat Casing 2” Brickmould 2” Ovalo *Special order. Extended lead-time. Irvin Serrano Photography An optional add-on chassis with the same profiles as our accessory frames is available for box mulls or other adaptations in the field. Textured Collection Weathered Collection Pearl Metallic Collection Metallic Collection Anodized Collection Industrial Collection Weathered Café Royale 104 Weathered Cocoa Weathered Brown 105 034 Weathered Clay 075 Weathered Red Weathered Rust Pepper 106 076 Weathered Basil 107 Weathered Bronze 078 Peppered Steel 110 f Sift Espresso 097 Mocha 098 Caj Cajun Spice 099 Pesto 100 El Cajon Silver 068 Platinum 067 Light Bronze Pearl 069 Medium Bronze Pearl 070 Dark Bronze Pearl 071 Alpine Silver 062 Metallic Champagne 063 Bronze Classic 064 Classic Copper 088 Copper Penny 065 Clear Anodized 103/332 Medium Bronze Dark Bronze Anodized 096/307 Anodized 095/306 Black Anodized Copper Anodized 117/353 352* Medium Bronze Industrial 101 Dark Bronze Industrial 102 15 *Available on select products only. Pricing may vary by collection. Whitney Kamman Photography | Centre Sky Architecturepatrickcoulie.com See your local representative for actual cladding samples. Printing limits our ability to show colors precisely. The exteriors of our clad windows and doors are fully encased in low maintenance, heavy-duty, extruded aluminum that’s at least twice as thick as roll-form cladding. What’s more, our finishing process leads the industry in durability and environmental safety. Non-hazardous AAMA 2604 and 2605 powder-coatings have the color retention, surface hardness and scratch resistance necessary to withstand even the harshest conditions. As for colors? Nobody gives you more choices than Sierra Pacific. 75 colors and some sensational textures allow you to add warmth, a splash of cheerfulness or a new statement to your designs. We’ll also custom match any color you choose. Color Stay ™ Collection Morning Dove Gray 113 Colonial White 313 Linen 032 French Linen 112 Gull Gray 007 Seawolf 044 Fashion Gray111 White 001 Sandstone 003 Beige 335 Tan 043 Black Sable 060 Slate Blue 008 Light Blue 046 Steel Blue 114 Slate Gray 045 Battleship Gray 321 TW Black 061 Teal 047 Hemlock Green 048 Patina Green 051 Forest Green 049 Aqua Mist 115 Hampton Blue 323 Sage Green 005 Teal 047 Moss 031 Greek Olive 081 Terra Cotta 053 Clay 026 Evergreen 009 Green 004 Hartford Green 050 Deep Plum116 Deep Taupe 077 Antique Bronze 057 ICI Brown 056 Colonial Red 054 Harvest Cranberry 010 Burgundy 055 Brown 002 Bronze 024 Black 023 TW Brown 058 Bahama Brown 309 Regal Brown 059 14 Inspired By Nature. Designed To Last. Clad Exterior Colors Available in vinyl. 99 ___ Warranty___ A Warranty As Tough As The Products It Guarantees. Sierra Pacific Windows and Doors are backed by our fully transferable 30/20 Limited Warranty (20/10 for commercial products). It provides 30 year residential AAMA 2605 clad exterior coating coverage, 20 year insulated glass coverage, 10 year parts coverage, 2 year labor coverage, and 10 year AAMA 2604 clad exterior coating coverage. For warranty specifics, please refer to SierraPacificWindows.com. 100 101©VanceFox.com | Jim Morrison Construction | Walton Architecture and Engineering Photo courtesy of Moody Images. BLADE™ MULTILINE POST RAILING SYSTEM Two bars, one post – this makes the BLADE™ our most popular line. The double bars can be customized with a variety of colors to match the interiors or provide a bold, contrasting statement. The contemporary design of this post supported system goes well with ultra-modern interiors as well as industrial applications. Choose from a variety of panel infills – glass, perforated metal panels, wire mesh panels and even multiline. PRODUCT: BLADE™ | INFILL: MULTILINE Visit vivarailings.com/blade for product data, specifications and drawings. DESIGN + ENGINEER + FABRICATE + INSTALL vivarailings.com1 B L A D E VIVA RAILINGS, LLC 1454 HALSEY WAY, CARROLLTON, TX 75007 P: 972-353-8482 F: 972-353-0013 e: info@vivarailings.com www.vivarailings.com V V A TM I Page 1 of 4BLADE RAILING SYSTEM MATERIAL FINISH SIZE / SPACING POST Stainless Steel (304 or 316) #6 Satin, #8 Mirror 2" Double flat bar post @ 5'-0" max. O.C. 4'-6" max. for perforated and wire mesh infill. 4'-0" max. for Multiline infill. Fascia, Top or Core mount. ECM Powder CoatSteel INFILL Glass Clear, Tinted or Frit Min. 3/8" laminated glass with PVB or SGP interlayer ¹ Glass standard thickness: 3/8", 1/2", 5/8", 3/4" Interlayer standard thickness, SGP: 0.035" , 0.06" PVB: 0.035" Perforated Metal #6 Satin 1" wide frameWire Mesh Picket Ø1/2" picket Multiline Ø1/2" multiline CableNet 1" Wide frame, Ø1/16" (1.5mm) cable mesh TOP RAIL / HAND RAIL Stainless Steel Tube #6 Satin, Powder Coat Ø1-1/2" or Ø2" for Hand Rail Ø1-1/2", Ø2" or 2"x1" Rectangular tube for Top Rail Stainless Steel Tube with LED ²#6 Satin Ø1-1/2" with LED LINEAR, Ø1-1/2" or Ø2" with LED POD Wood (Red Oak, Cherry or Maple) ³Unstained Ø2" Wood (Red Oak, Cherry or Maple) with LED Ø2" with LED LINEAR (1) IBC 2015 & newer requires railing glass to be laminated. VIVA recommends SGP for exterior applications. (3) Other species available upon request. (2) All LED LINEAR products are ETL certified; ETL mark is proof of product compliance to North American safety standard. US Intertek CM LISTE D Technical Data Specifications BLADE™ POST RAILING SYSTEM BLADE™ RAILING SYSTEM - SPECIFICATIONS TECHNICAL DATA DESIGN + ENGINEER + FABRICATE + INSTALL vivarailings.com2 B L A D E rev. 5.21.2021 DESIGN + ENGINEER + FABRICATE + INSTALL vivarailings.com VIVA RAILINGS IS NOT RESPONSIBLE FOR THE STRUCTURAL INTEGRITY OF ANY BUILDING SYSTEMS OR OTHER MATERIALS NOT FURNISHED BY VIVA RAILINGS. VIVA RAILINGS HAS NO WAY OF KNOWING AND SPECIFICALLY DISCLAIMS WHETHER OR NOT THE BUILDING SYSTEMS TO WHICH VIVA RAILINGS' PRODUCTS ARE TO BE ATTACHED ARE STRUCTURALLY SOUND OR DESIGNED TO PROPERLY SUPPORT VIVA RAILINGS'S MATERIALS. ANY SUCH DESIGN RESPONSIBILITY BELONGS TO OTHERS FOR WHOM VIVA RAILINGS IS NOT RESPONSIBLE. THESE DRAWINGS ARE INTENDED FOR THE SOLE USE OF VIVA RAILINGS' CUSTOMER AND THEIR AGENTS FOR THE INSTALLATION OF PRODUCTS FURNISHED BY VIVA RAILINGS. VIVA RAILINGS REMAINS THE SOLE OWNER OF ALL DESIGNS AND INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY CONTAINED WITHIN. REPRODUCTION AND USE OF THESE DESIGNS FOR ANY OTHER PURPOSE IS FORBIDDEN. SCALES ARE PROVIDED FOR REFERENCE ONLY. FOR PRODUCT INFORMATION AND TECHNICAL SUPPORT, PLEASE CONTACT VIVA RAILINGS. 3 MULTILINE INFILLBLADE™ 4'-0" MAX4'-0" MAX 1'-0" 1'-0" Multiline Infill MULTILINE BLADE POST TOP RAIL HAND RAIL 2" MAX.4" MAX.VIVA RAILINGS, LLC 1454 HALSEY WAY, CARROLLTON, TX 75007 P: 972-353-8482 F: 972-353-0013 e: info@vivarailings.com www.vivarailings.com V V A TM I Page 2.5 of 4BLADE RAILING SYSTEM VIVA RAILINGS IS NOT RESPONSIBLE FOR THE STRUCTURAL INTEGRITY OF ANY BUILDING SYSTEMS OR OTHER MATERIALS NOT FURNISHED BY VIVA RAILINGS. VIVA RAILINGS HAS NO WAY OF KNOWING AND SPECIFICALLY DISCLAIMS WHETHER OR NOT THE BUILDING SYSTEMS TO WHICH VIVA RAILINGS' PRODUCTS ARE TO BE ATTACHED ARE STRUCTURALLY SOUND OR DESIGNED TO PROPERLY SUPPORT VIVA RAILINGS'S MATERIALS. ANY SUCH DESIGN RESPONSIBILITY BELONGS TO OTHERS FOR WHOM VIVA RAILINGS IS NOT RESPONSIBLE. THESE DRAWINGS ARE INTENDED FOR THE SOLE USE OF VIVA RAILINGS' CUSTOMER AND THEIR AGENTS FOR THE INSTALLATION OF PRODUCTS FURNISHED BY VIVA RAILINGS. VIVA RAILINGS REMAINS THE SOLE OWNER OF ALL DESIGNS AND INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY CONTAINED WITHIN. REPRODUCTION AND USE OF THESE DESIGNS FOR ANY OTHER PURPOSE IS FORBIDDEN. SCALES ARE PROVIDED FOR REFERENCE ONLY. FOR PRODUCT INFORMATION AND TECHNICAL SUPPORT, PLEASE CONTACT VIVA RAILINGS. R4" LEVEL 1 0'-0" FINISH FLOOR3'-0"3'-6"TOP RAIL OPTIONS Ø2" TUBE Ø1-1/2" TUBE 2"x1" TUBE Ø1-1/2" iRAIL HAND RAIL MULTILINE TOP RAIL STRINGER Ø12" TUBE 4" MAX.B L A D E 6"MIN. Welded @ Embed Plate - $ Detail# BL-T04 Anchored to Concrete ¹ - $ ² Detail# BL-T01 ³ Welded @ Steel Channel - $ Detail# BL-T03 Cored into Concrete - $$ Detail# BL-T02 Embed Plate (By others) Mounting Condition, Top Mounted Post 3" MIN.5"MIN.6"MIN.5"MIN.5"MIN.5"MIN.(1) Min. 4000 PSI concrete, Typ. (2) $ to $$$: Indicates mounting type comparative cost (3) Bolting is not a available option for top mount with cable infill 612" MIN.3"MIN.VIVA RAILINGS, LLC 1454 HALSEY WAY, CARROLLTON, TX 75007 P: 972-353-8482 F: 972-353-0013 e: info@vivarailings.com www.vivarailings.com V V A TM I Page 3.1 of 4BLADE RAILING SYSTEM VIVA RAILINGS IS NOT RESPONSIBLE FOR THE STRUCTURAL INTEGRITY OF ANY BUILDING SYSTEMS OR OTHER MATERIALS NOT FURNISHED BY VIVA RAILINGS. VIVA RAILINGS HAS NO WAY OF KNOWING AND SPECIFICALLY DISCLAIMS WHETHER OR NOT THE BUILDING SYSTEMS TO WHICH VIVA RAILINGS' PRODUCTS ARE TO BE ATTACHED ARE STRUCTURALLY SOUND OR DESIGNED TO PROPERLY SUPPORT VIVA RAILINGS'S MATERIALS. ANY SUCH DESIGN RESPONSIBILITY BELONGS TO OTHERS FOR WHOM VIVA RAILINGS IS NOT RESPONSIBLE. THESE DRAWINGS ARE INTENDED FOR THE SOLE USE OF VIVA RAILINGS' CUSTOMER AND THEIR AGENTS FOR THE INSTALLATION OF PRODUCTS FURNISHED BY VIVA RAILINGS. VIVA RAILINGS REMAINS THE SOLE OWNER OF ALL DESIGNS AND INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY CONTAINED WITHIN. REPRODUCTION AND USE OF THESE DESIGNS FOR ANY OTHER PURPOSE IS FORBIDDEN. SCALES ARE PROVIDED FOR REFERENCE ONLY. FOR PRODUCT INFORMATION AND TECHNICAL SUPPORT, PLEASE CONTACT VIVA RAILINGS. 3/8" BENT PLATE (BY OTHERS)258"4"MIN.Anchored to Concrete Welded to Steel Plate - $ Detail# BL-T06 Anchored to Concrete Slab on Deck - $$ Detail# BL-T05 DESIGN + ENGINEER + FABRICATE + INSTALL vivarailings.com VIVA RAILINGS IS NOT RESPONSIBLE FOR THE STRUCTURAL INTEGRITY OF ANY BUILDING SYSTEMS OR OTHER MATERIALS NOT FURNISHED BY VIVA RAILINGS. VIVA RAILINGS HAS NO WAY OF KNOWING AND SPECIFICALLY DISCLAIMS WHETHER OR NOT THE BUILDING SYSTEMS TO WHICH VIVA RAILINGS' PRODUCTS ARE TO BE ATTACHED ARE STRUCTURALLY SOUND OR DESIGNED TO PROPERLY SUPPORT VIVA RAILINGS'S MATERIALS. ANY SUCH DESIGN RESPONSIBILITY BELONGS TO OTHERS FOR WHOM VIVA RAILINGS IS NOT RESPONSIBLE. THESE DRAWINGS ARE INTENDED FOR THE SOLE USE OF VIVA RAILINGS' CUSTOMER AND THEIR AGENTS FOR THE INSTALLATION OF PRODUCTS FURNISHED BY VIVA RAILINGS. VIVA RAILINGS REMAINS THE SOLE OWNER OF ALL DESIGNS AND INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY CONTAINED WITHIN. REPRODUCTION AND USE OF THESE DESIGNS FOR ANY OTHER PURPOSE IS FORBIDDEN. SCALES ARE PROVIDED FOR REFERENCE ONLY. FOR PRODUCT INFORMATION AND TECHNICAL SUPPORT, PLEASE CONTACT VIVA RAILINGS. 9 MOUNTING CONDITION-TOP MOUNTED POSTBLADE™B L A D E 6"6"6"Welded @ Steel Tube - $$ Detail# BL-F04 Anchored to Concrete ¹ - $$$ Detail# BL-F01 Welded @ Steel Channel - $$ Detail# BL-F03 Welded @ Embed Plate - $$ Detail# BL-F02 Mounting Condition, Fascia Mounted Post 6"MIN.(1) Min. 4000 PSI concrete, Typ.6"MIN.6"VIVA RAILINGS, LLC 1454 HALSEY WAY, CARROLLTON, TX 75007 P: 972-353-8482 F: 972-353-0013 e: info@vivarailings.com www.vivarailings.com V V A TM I Page 3.2 of 4BLADE RAILING SYSTEM 6"6" Embed Plate (By others) VIVA RAILINGS IS NOT RESPONSIBLE FOR THE STRUCTURAL INTEGRITY OF ANY BUILDING SYSTEMS OR OTHER MATERIALS NOT FURNISHED BY VIVA RAILINGS. VIVA RAILINGS HAS NO WAY OF KNOWING AND SPECIFICALLY DISCLAIMS WHETHER OR NOT THE BUILDING SYSTEMS TO WHICH VIVA RAILINGS' PRODUCTS ARE TO BE ATTACHED ARE STRUCTURALLY SOUND OR DESIGNED TO PROPERLY SUPPORT VIVA RAILINGS'S MATERIALS. ANY SUCH DESIGN RESPONSIBILITY BELONGS TO OTHERS FOR WHOM VIVA RAILINGS IS NOT RESPONSIBLE. THESE DRAWINGS ARE INTENDED FOR THE SOLE USE OF VIVA RAILINGS' CUSTOMER AND THEIR AGENTS FOR THE INSTALLATION OF PRODUCTS FURNISHED BY VIVA RAILINGS. VIVA RAILINGS REMAINS THE SOLE OWNER OF ALL DESIGNS AND INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY CONTAINED WITHIN. REPRODUCTION AND USE OF THESE DESIGNS FOR ANY OTHER PURPOSE IS FORBIDDEN. SCALES ARE PROVIDED FOR REFERENCE ONLY. FOR PRODUCT INFORMATION AND TECHNICAL SUPPORT, PLEASE CONTACT VIVA RAILINGS.3"MIN.Welded @ Pour Stop - $$ Detail# BL-F053"MIN.STUD or DEFORMED REBAR (BY OTHERS) 3/8" THICK POUR STOP (BY OTHERS) DESIGN + ENGINEER + FABRICATE + INSTALL vivarailings.com VIVA RAILINGS IS NOT RESPONSIBLE FOR THE STRUCTURAL INTEGRITY OF ANY BUILDING SYSTEMS OR OTHER MATERIALS NOT FURNISHED BY VIVA RAILINGS. VIVA RAILINGS HAS NO WAY OF KNOWING AND SPECIFICALLY DISCLAIMS WHETHER OR NOT THE BUILDING SYSTEMS TO WHICH VIVA RAILINGS' PRODUCTS ARE TO BE ATTACHED ARE STRUCTURALLY SOUND OR DESIGNED TO PROPERLY SUPPORT VIVA RAILINGS'S MATERIALS. ANY SUCH DESIGN RESPONSIBILITY BELONGS TO OTHERS FOR WHOM VIVA RAILINGS IS NOT RESPONSIBLE. THESE DRAWINGS ARE INTENDED FOR THE SOLE USE OF VIVA RAILINGS' CUSTOMER AND THEIR AGENTS FOR THE INSTALLATION OF PRODUCTS FURNISHED BY VIVA RAILINGS. VIVA RAILINGS REMAINS THE SOLE OWNER OF ALL DESIGNS AND INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY CONTAINED WITHIN. REPRODUCTION AND USE OF THESE DESIGNS FOR ANY OTHER PURPOSE IS FORBIDDEN. SCALES ARE PROVIDED FOR REFERENCE ONLY. FOR PRODUCT INFORMATION AND TECHNICAL SUPPORT, PLEASE CONTACT VIVA RAILINGS. 10 MOUNTING CONDITION-FASCIA MOUNTED POSTBLADE™B L A D E DESIGN + ENGINEER + FABRICATE + INSTALL vivarailings.com VIVA RAILINGS IS NOT RESPONSIBLE FOR THE STRUCTURAL INTEGRITY OF ANY BUILDING SYSTEMS OR OTHER MATERIALS NOT FURNISHED BY VIVA RAILINGS. VIVA RAILINGS HAS NO WAY OF KNOWING AND SPECIFICALLY DISCLAIMS WHETHER OR NOT THE BUILDING SYSTEMS TO WHICH VIVA RAILINGS' PRODUCTS ARE TO BE ATTACHED ARE STRUCTURALLY SOUND OR DESIGNED TO PROPERLY SUPPORT VIVA RAILINGS'S MATERIALS. ANY SUCH DESIGN RESPONSIBILITY BELONGS TO OTHERS FOR WHOM VIVA RAILINGS IS NOT RESPONSIBLE. THESE DRAWINGS ARE INTENDED FOR THE SOLE USE OF VIVA RAILINGS' CUSTOMER AND THEIR AGENTS FOR THE INSTALLATION OF PRODUCTS FURNISHED BY VIVA RAILINGS. VIVA RAILINGS REMAINS THE SOLE OWNER OF ALL DESIGNS AND INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY CONTAINED WITHIN. REPRODUCTION AND USE OF THESE DESIGNS FOR ANY OTHER PURPOSE IS FORBIDDEN. SCALES ARE PROVIDED FOR REFERENCE ONLY. FOR PRODUCT INFORMATION AND TECHNICAL SUPPORT, PLEASE CONTACT VIVA RAILINGS. 12 FINISHING OPTIONSBLADE™ #6 Satin is a silver-white finish with relatively short linear directional polishing lines. This finish is quite common with SS architectural applications. It is a two-step abrasive polish finish with the equivalent of a 240 grit abrasive. #8 Mirror is the most reflective finish covered by ASTM Standards. Produced in a similar way as the #6 finish with further buffing. The grit lines are much less visible than the #6 finish but can be seen upon close inspection. The final product is a mirror-like finish. *#8 Mirror Finish comes at an additional cost to our #6 Finish. Powder coating is a dry film process, using finely ground particles of pigment and resin which are electrostatically charged and sprayed onto electrically grounded parts to be coated. The charged powder particles ad- here to the parts and are held there until melted and fused into a uniformly flowing coating in a cure oven. Before coating, the parts must be pretreated similar to liquid coated parts. Designed to withstand extreme temperatures, powder-coating protects against rust and staining, making it a weather-resistant finish for our stain- less steel and aluminum railings. It helps in regards to LEED requirements and in addition, it meets AAMA specifications. #6 SATIN - #8 MIRROR POWDER COAT + SS 2-TONE ECM is a new finish offered by VIVA Railings and can be applied to nearly all of our modular railing systems. This method of electroplated coating offers an environmentally friendly process that includes an even better abrasion and weather resistance to our already durable stainless steel railing systems. Although ECM is only a few microns thick, the bonding process once applied, is extremely durable, hard and heat resistant, which is a plus for outdoor modular railing systems. ECM offers a low maintenance, high durability and one of the best corrosion resistant materials on the market today. Parts are sealed in an airtight chamber where a vacuum is created and the negative voltage attracts the positive ions and inert a gas to create the environment in which the deposition process occurs. ECM + SS 2-TONE B L A D E