The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutLand Use Case.1475 Sierra Vista Dr 0038.2014.ASLUTHE CITY OF ASPEN[ FILE 1 OF 3 City of Aspen Community Development Department CASE NUMBER 0038.2014.ASLU PARCEL ID NUMBERS 273511105006 PROJECTS ADDRESS 1475 SIERRA VISTA DRIVE PLANNER JEN PHELAN CASE DESCRIPTION RESIDENTIAL DESIGN STANDARD VARIANCE REPRESENTATIVE DYLAN JOHNS (ZONE 4 ARCHITECTS DATE OF FINAL ACTION 7.31.14 CLOSED BY ANGELA SCOREY ON: 9.3.14 RECEIVED APR 2 1 2014 CITY OF ASPEN PRE-APPLICATION CONFERENCE SUMMARY CITY OF ASPEN COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT PLANNER: Sara Nadolny, 970.429.2739 DATE: 3/17/2014 PROJECT: 1475 Sierra Vista Drive REPRESENTATIVE: Dylan Johns & Bill Pollock (Zone 4 Architects) - 970.948.6787 TYPE OF APPLICATION: Residential Design Standard Variance DESCRIPTION: The applicants are interested in remodeling the subject property. 1475 Sierra Vista Dr. is located in the R-15 zone district, on a cul-de-sac road that backs up to the Aspen Golf Course property. According to the improvement survey plat (1967, Book 3, Page 252), this property is Lot 33 of the West Aspen Subdivision, and measures 16,002 sq. ft. The current single-family residence on the site was constructed with a number of features that are considered non-conformities per the current Residential Design Standards. The garage is forward of the front-most wall of the house, which is permitted on lots at least 15,000 sq. ft. in size, but the doors are not side-loaded, which is a condition of the current code. Also the building orientation is most likely not exactly parallel to the tangent of the midpoint of the arc of the street, a condition that is required on curvilinear streets. As part of the remodel, the applicants are interested in lengthening the garage to accommodate larger vehicle storage. The garage doors that are currently not side-loaded will not be corrected as part of this proposed renovation. The building sits on an angle to the street, and the garage doors do not face directly onto Sierra Vista Dr. Staff will review the orientation of this building element in relation to the appropriate section of the Code. The applicant has requested first an administrative review, recognizing that these variances may require further review by the Planning and Zoning Commission. As a minor improvement to the site, the applicant may request a variance from the residential design standards relating to Sections 26.410.040.C.2.c. (side loaded garage) and 26.110.010.D.1.a (location of entry door). Below is a link to the Land Use Application Form for your convenience: nttp.//www.aspenpitkin.com/Portais/0/docs/City/Corndev/Apps%20and%20Fees/2011%20land%20use %20app%20form.pdf I - g,ku.>- Land Use Code Section(s) bÂ©6> A n\P J 26.304 Common Development Review Procedures , , ,~ c Nl 26.312.030 Non-conforming structures - 'A U \ -- -P-~ -0.- 26.410 Residential Design Standards 26.410.020.D.1 Variances \Ar~% ~47 26.410.040.C Parking, garages and carports il>1 v 26.410.040.D Building elements 26.710.050 Moderate-Density Residential (R-15) RAF AR http://www.aspenpitkin.com/Departments/Community-Development/Planning-Md-Zoning/Title- 26-Land-Use-Code/ Review by: 4 administrative determination 1) Community Development Staff for complete application and 1 Public Hearing: None at this time - may update this application to reflect a public hearing before P&Z should the administrative review be denied, and the applicants wish to pursue this avenue. Planning Fees: $650 - flat fee for administrative Residential Design Variance review Referral Fees: None. Total Deposit: $650 Total Number of Application Copies: 2 Copies Includes appropriate drawing for board review (HPC = 12; PZ = 10; CC = 7; Referral Agencies = 1/ea.; Planning Staff = 2) To apply, submit the following information 111 Total Deposit for review of application. ly'l Pre-application Conference Summary. [ZfApplicant's name, address and telephone number, contained within a letter signed by the applicant stating the name, address, and telephone number of the representative authorized to act on behalf of the applicant. LL Street address and legal description of the parcel on which development is proposed to occur, consisting of a current certificate from a title insurance company, or attorney licensed to practice in the State of Colorado, listing the names of all owners of the property, and all mortgages, judgments, liens, easements, contracts and agreements affecting the parcel, and demonstrating the owner's right to apply for the Development Application. [-PIA site plan, floor plans and elevations depicting the proposed layout and the project's physical relationship to the land and its surroundings. [pfbompleted Land Use application and signed fee agreement. I-*An 8 1/2" x 11" vicinity map locating the subject parcels within the City of Aspen. r-@71'~ written description of the variance being requested, and answers to the appropriate criteria found at 26.410.020.D.1 of the Land Use Code LÂ£] Two copies of the Land Use Application and all additional materials. Disclaimer: The foregoing summary is advisory in nature only and is not binding on the City. The summary is based on current zoning, which is subject to change in the future, and upon factual representations that may or may not be accurate The summary does not create a legal or vested right. 2 April 09, 2014 City of Aspen Community Development Department 130 South Galena Street, 3rd Floor Aspen, CO 81611 RE: 1475 Sierra Vista Drive To Whom it May Concern: Zone 4 Architects has the authorization of Mr. & Mrs. Allen Hodges, the property Owner, to meet with City of Aspen officials as well as submit any required land use applications, permit applIcations, and change orders for the sole purpose of remodeling the existing residence and property currently designated by the address 1475 Sierra Vista Drive in Aspen, Colorado and having a Parcel ID #273511105006. , Since~r~l"~~(~~~/- Mr. Alled'Hodges' â€¢ ~/ f RECEPTION#: 37, 10/30/2013 at 10:32:46 AM, 1 OF 3, R $21.00 DF $325.50 Doc Code WD Documentary Fee $ 325.50 Janice K. Vos Caudill, Pitkin County, CO WARRANTY DEED THIS DEED, made this 25th day of October: 2013, Between THE JONATHAN W STOLLER REVOCABLE TRUST DATED 5/18/88Â·AS TO AN UNDIVIDED 1/2 INTEREST and JOHN HERBERT HAMSHER AS TO AN UNDIVIDED 1/2 INTEREST of the County of LOS ANGELES, State of CALIFORNIA, GRANTOR, AND L. ALLEN HODGES 111 and JANET S. HODGES, GRANTEE whose legal address is : 306 W. 7TH STREET, SUITE 701, FORT WORTH, TX 76102 of the County of TARRANT, State of TEXAS WITNESSETH, That for and in consideration of the sum of ten dollars and other good and valuable consideration, the receipt and sufficiency of which is hereby acknowledged, the grantor has granted, bargained, sold and conveyed, and by these presents does grant, bargainl sell and convey and confirm unto the grantee, their heirs and assigns forever, al] the real property together with improvements, if any, situate and lying and being in the County of PITKIN; State of COLORADO, described as follows LOT 33, WEST ASPEN SUBDIVISION, FILING NO. 1, according to the Plat thereof recorded September 5. 1967 in Piat Book 3 at Page 252. TOGETHER with all and singular the hereditaments and appurtenances thereto belonging, or in anywise appertaining, and the reversion and reversions. remainders, rents, issues and profits thereof. and all the estate, right; title, interest claim and demand whatsoever of the grantor ejther in }aw or equity, of, in and to the above bargained premises, with the hereditaments and appurtenances- TO HAVE AND TO HOLD the said premises above bargained and described, with the appurtenances, unto the grantee, their heirs and assigns forever. And the Grantor: for themselves, their successors, heirs and assigns, does covenant: grant, bargain, and agree to and with the Grantee, their heirs and assigns, that at the time of the ensealing and delivery of these presents, they are well seized of the premises above conveyed, -has good, sure, perfect, absolute and indefeasible estate of inheritance, in law, in fee simple, and has good right, full power and lawful authority to grant, bargain, sell and convey the same in manner and form as aforesaid, and that the same are free and dear from all former and other grants, bargains, sales, liens, taxes, assessments, encumbrances and restrictions of whatever kind or nature soever: except those matters as set forth on Exhibit "A" attached hereto and incorporated herein by reference. The grantor shall and will WARRANT AND FOREVER DEFEND the above bargained premises in the quiet and peaceable possession of the grantee, their heirs and assigns, against all and every person or persons lawfully claiming the whole or any part thereof. The singular number shall include the plural, the plural the singular, and the use of gender shall be applicable to al! genders. IN WITNESS WHEREOF the grantor has executed this deed. SIGNATURES ON PAGE 2 OrrY OF ASPEN 1 *mEN PNO 91-rf 05 AB~EN DAâ„¢ le*.140.95-967 MRErr PA#D It)/3olib i 013'j 115 011â„¢ ap ky)Â·95<69 1 SIGNATURE PAGE TO WARRANTY DEED PAGE 2 THE JONATHAN W. STOLLER REVOCABLE TRUST DATED 5/18/88 By: Jonath ,Â·~ Stoller, Trustee At-__ N JOH~AERBERT HAiVISHER ' l STATE OF COLORADO ) SS COUNTY OF PITKIN ) Alk The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this 8} J day of October, 2013, by JONATHAN W. STOLLER, TRUSTEE OF THE JONATHAN W. STOLLER REVOCAB~E TRUST DATED 5118/88 and JOHN HERBERT HAMSHER. 1 14Â«-4 WITNESS my hand and official seal my commission expires: -1-\ 6-14 ~ary Public ~ ~ 1 1 /0610 46.X 1 E. 4 NvioN . PCT23841W3 Nk<*21&;01 - EXHIBIT "A" 1. Taxes for the year 2013, and subsequent years, not yet due or payable. 2. Right of the proprietor of a vein or lode to extract or remove his ore therefrom, should the same be found to penetrate or intersect the premises hereby granted as reserved in United States Patent recorded in Book 55 at Page 33. 3. Easements, rights of way and aii matters as disclosed on Plat of subject property recorded in Plat Book 3 at Page 252. 4. Encroachments by the 1) driveway onto the 5 foot underground utility easement and 2) fence extending outside of lot line on the North, East and South sides and 3) yard extending outside of lot line, on North side, onto right of way and 4) yard, planters, stone wall and railroad tie wall extending outside of lot line, on South side, onto Aspen Golf Course and 5) planter and deck onto 10 foot underground utility easement and 6) mechanical shed onto 10 foot underground utility easement as now located on said property as shown on Survey by Aspen Survey Engineers, Inc. dated October 21,2011, as Job No. 41280. COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTWIENT Ivll Agreement to Pay Application Fees An agreement between the City of Aspen CCity") and Property Phone No.: 817.877.4646 ext 100 Owner (7"): Allen Hodges Email: ahodges@hodgesco.net Address of 1475 Sierra Vista Drive Billing 360 West 7th Street #701 Property: Fort Worth, TX 76102 (subject of Aspen Co, 81611 Address: (send bills here) application) I understand that the City has adopted, via Ordinance No. . Series of 2011, review fees for Land Use applications and the payment of these fees is a condition precedent to determining application completeness I understand that as the property owner that I am responsible for paying all fees for this development application. For flat fees and referral fees: I agree to pay the following fees for the services indicated. I understand that these flat fees are non-refundable. $ 650 flat fee for Admin Variance . $ flat fee for $ flat fee for . $ flat fee for For deposit cases only: The City and I understand that because of the size, nature or scope of the proposed project, it is not possible at this time to know the full extent or total costs involved in processing the application. I understand that additional costs over and above the deposit may accrue. I understand and agree that it is impracticable for City staff to complete processing, review, and presentation of sufficient information to enable legally required findings to be made for project consideration, unless invoices are paid in full. The City and I understand and agree that invoices mailed by the City to the above listed billing address and not returned to the City shall be considered by the City as being received by me. I agree to remit payment within 30 days of presentation of an invoice by the City for such services. I have read, understood, and agree to the Land Use Review Fee Policy induding consequences for non-payment. I agree to pay the following initial deposit amounts for the specified hours of staff time. I understand that payment of a deposit does not render an application complete or compliant with approval criteria. If actual recorded costs exceed the initial deposit, I agree to pay additional monthly billings to the City to reimburse the City for the processing of my application at the hourly rates hereinafter stated. $ N/A deposit for hours of Community Development Department staff time. Additional time above the deposit amount will be billed at $315 per hour. $ N/A deposit for hours of Engineering Department staff time. Additional time above the deposit amount will be billed at $265 per hour. City of Aspen: 1 Property Owl,er: l % W-W - Chris Bendon */ Community Development Director Name: Allen Hodges Title: Owner, 1475 Sierra Vista Drive City Use: Fees Due: $ Received: $ City of.\spen I 130 S. Galena St. I (970) 920-5090 November. 2111 ATTACHMENT 2 -LAND USE APPLICATION PROJECT: Name: FETS Stalf KA v , s-r* D kivE. Location: 14:75 staR RA VISTA DKIVES'\46â€¢r A~724,l-al-: 1-1 , y 1,445- 1 (Indicate street address, lot & block number, legal description where appropnate) Parcel ID # (REQUIRED) 2739///05006 APPLICANT: Name: A L 623 Zon,Es Address: MD Was,r -1 ID sret~- * 701,7-0 *-r \,4,=r. 7% luoa Phone #: 8/7. 877 4-646 x /00 REPRESENTATIVE: Name: 2..ir 4 AMCH,recrs.,A_L-c- / Dil-,4 40,4 %45 Address. P.O. Box- 25.08 , Aspe~ , CO 8/6/2 Phone #: 770 Â·427 Â· 8+76 TYPE OF APPLICATION: (please check all that apply): GMQS Exemption E Conceptual PUD U Temporary Use GMQS Allotment U Final PUD (& PUD Amendment) Â£ Text/Map Amendment Special Review E Subdivision U Conceptual SPA ESA - 8040 Greenline. Stream U Subdivision Exemption (includes U Final SPA (& SPA Margin, Hallam Lake Bluff, condominiumization) Amendment) Mountain View Plane Â£ Commercial Design Review U Lot Split U Small Lodge Conversion/ Expansion ~X["'0 Residential Design Variance U Lot Line Adjustment U Other: El Conditional Use EXISTING CONDITIONS: (description of existing buildings, uses, previous approvals, etc.) 5,Â·Ver,-Â£ -FA'li,-->~ f<-Folpile-e. +rH 404<.e,~F;60.1v11 46- Gr-*<.Ac:,â‚¬=- PROPOSAL: (description ofproposed buildings, uses, modifications. etc.) 5/ 46-LE- F Ad/,-7 R-211 se.~CE- RA<lobEL A,fD AD>h,7-7.04 Hilve you attached the following? FEES DUE: $ 625-0:0= [E[ Pre-Application Conference Summary [Z~ Attachment # 1. Signed Fee Agreement [2!' Response to Attachment #3, Dimensional Requirements Form Gf'Response to Attachment #4, Submittal Requirements- Including Written Responses to Review Standards 0 3-D Model for large project All plans that are larger than 8.5" X 11" must be folded. A disk with an electric copy of all written text (Microuoft Word Fnrmat) must be submitted as part of the application. Large scale projects should include an electronic 3-D model. Your pre-application conference summary will indicate if you must submit a 3-D model. nomm ATTACHMENT 3 DIMENSIONAL REQUIREMENTS FORM Project. /475 5/2/:RA Qs-rA- D L, ve-1 Applicant: AÂ·Â£--4.-E,>/ /0op e-Es LocaUorY. /475- 5/2<RA V'/11-A PA,16., Asp'-/ Zone District: R, - /â‚¬- Lot Size: 0 367' ACK* Lot Area. /6,002 S.F. (for the purposes of calculating Floor Area. Lot Area may be reduced for areas within the high water mark, easements, and steep slopes. Please refer to the definition of Lot Area in the Municipal Code.) Commercial net leasable: Existing: Proposed: Number of residential units: Existing: Proposed: Number of bedrooms: Existing: 3 Proposed: 6 Proposed % ofdemolition (Historic properties only): DIMENSIONS: Floor Area: Existing: 36 25,r Allowable: 4 5-60 1 Proposed: 4560 1. Principal bldg.height Existing: Al' /li" Allowable: &6~ Proposed: a~M ' Access.bldg.height Existing: to ' Allowable: A/* Proposed: w/k On-Site parking: Existing: 1 Required: k Proposed. A Â°/o Site coverage: Existing: /7 3 % Required: proposed: A **'t %Openspace: Existing: /9/2 Required: 01 Proposed: /,t,61. Front Setback: Existing: 25' Required: 25' Proposed: @S' Rear Setback. Existing: CO Required: /O' Proposedt L 0% CorrknnedÂ¥ IR. Existing: w,4 Required: W /* proposed: 0,/4 Side Setback: Existing: /O' Required: /O ' Proposed: lo ' Side Setback: Existing: /O ' Required: /O Proposed: /6 ' Combined Sides: Existing; r~A Rew*red.- 81 l A ProposedÂ· ti /AL Distance Between Existing *â‚¬-10" Required. /(9 Proposed. 4/k Buildings Existing non-conformities or encroachillents: 6-ALAGE& Pkf< PÂ¢-5/029>-2>4 4.- Pas, r,q Sl.Â»ID/VED>:b Variations requested: />AL,REEASEÂ· 644 RAe-Zi /~4- de,#:roR/1 /7.47~ VICINITY MAP I N.T.s. â€¢ 1 !1,1,/'i.'41/. .1 2.,1.4,1 6 -''C,7/, f,1 ..4:et . Asoel ,Â· . Meadows w : I â‚¬00, 1 Her.0~1 0'...11 1. c Â·> 09 fled Butte 2 - Cefetery ' 1 ... 2 1 AL - 1871 ~ . J Â£ 1/ ../ 'Ti Li k.1 . PROJECT SITE -- . 1 82 .2 A5Df .-2 27 IIi,oldel Marc>|! 3 L MU : . t.' - . - rÂ· Â·, -â‚¬ - Mining & â€¢ Fixl liar,chirg M.isectÂ·n 1,7412,Â· - I - ,Derl I ugh k â‚¬ t - 4 3 N D ~871 School * 11 Asce-1 Valley Wheele- Hosoltal . [72-1 Opera House Project Site: 1475 Sierra Vista Drive, Aspen, CO 81611 '22 14 42 ZONE ARCHITECTS LLC April 21. 2013 HAND DELIVERY Ms. Sara Nadolny City of Aspen Community Development Department 130 South Galena Street Aspen, CO 81611 Re: 1475 Sierra Vista Drive - Residential Design Standard Variance Dear Sara: This is an application to consider an administrative vanance exemption from Section 26410.040.A. 1 and 26.410.040.C 2.c of the Land Use Code for the purposes of remodeling and expanding a single family home located at 1475 Sierra Vista drive. The subject property is currently a two story single family residence which is legally described as Subdivision: West Aspen; Lot: 33; Filing: 1 The West Aspen subdivision including Cemetery Lane and ancillary streets is a very eclectic assortment of residential structures, with both conforming and non-conforming residences as they relate to today's design standard requirements. This neighborhood has also seen a great deal of redevelopment over the last 10 years, with many of the existing properties being remodeled vs. scraped and replaced. The net effect of that trend is the preservation of existing non-conforming design elements into the foreseeable future. The proposed design for the properly will continue to utilize the existing garage, front fagade, and foundation to the greatest extent possible. To address the specific Residential Design Standards, please see the following paragraphs Vanance Request from Section 26.410.040.A.1 Building orientation: "The front facades of all principal structures shall be parallel to the street ... On curvilinear streets, the front facade of all structures shall be parallel to the tangent of the midpoint of the arc of the street..." As the Applicant would like to utilize the existing foundation and portions of the structure, the application does not propose to modify the existing angle of the structure relative to the street This property is located at the end of a dead end street with a cul-d-sac, is setback substantially from the edge of pavement, and has a slight angle from the tangent point of the cul-d-sac. It would be an unfair hardship to require that the entire fagade of the house be rebuilt simply to satisfy this design requirement. Variance Request from Section 26410.040.02.c Parking, Garaqes and Carports: -On lots of at least fifteen thousand (15,000) square feet in size, the garage or carport may be forward of the front fagade of the house only if the garage doors or carport entry are perpendicular to the street (side loaded)." The applicant is requesting permission to move the existing garage door / fagade toward the street 2'- 1" from its existing location. The current garage is not deep enough to accommodate longer wheelbase vehicles (LWBV) which are commonly utilized today, and this application seeks to permit an LWBV to be parked within the garage rather than solely on the driveway. which we feel is a greater benefit to the neighborhood's visual environment. To bring the garage element into full conformance with the design guidelines would require an entirely new floor plan/site plan concept, which is beyond the scope of what the current Owners wish to undertake for this property. There are also many examples of street facing garages within the pattern of development in the neighborhood, and this property will not be out of character with the existing pattern of development. In response to the other criteria for review of this vanance request applicatjon, please see below: 26.410.020 D Variances. 1. Administrative variances The applicant may seek an administrative variance for not more than three (3) of the individual requirements. An applicant who desires a variance from the residential design standards shall demonstrate, and the Community Development Director shall find that the variances, if granted, would- a). Provide an appropriate design or pattern of development considering the context in which the development is proposed and the purpose of the particular standard. In evaluating the context as it is used in the criteria, the director may consider the relationship of the proposed development with adjacent structures. the immediate neighborhood setting or a broader vicinity as the director feels is necessary to determine if the exception is warranted; or Response: There are several properties in the immediate vicinity of the subject property which do not conform to Section 26.410.040.C.2.c. The proposed design is not out of context within the immediate neighborhood given both the historic development, and most recent redevelopment pattern. m. Be clearly necessary for reasons of fairness related to unusual site-specific constraints. - Response. It would be an unfair burden on the homeowner to require a complete demolition of the structure in order to comply with the design vanance requests, and not allow the property to be updated in a minor way to allow it to perform to today's standards of use. The Owner's request to move the existing garage fagade towards the street 211" would not create a non-conformity with Residential Design Standard 26410.040.D. 1.a. as the front entry door would still be within 10'-0" from the proposed garage fagade. Thank you for your consideration, Dylan Johns Zone 4 Architects CC: File Applicant - 222 IMPROVEMENT SURVEY PLAT LOT 33, WEST ASPEN SUBDIVISION, FILING NO. 1 HATCH LEGEND LINE TYPE LEGEND ACCORDING TO THE THE PLAT RECORDED SEPTEMBER 5,1967 IN PLAT BOOK 3 AT PAGE 252 B..ElELEV[SM T L.1 AspHALT El-1-riRIC LINE m.. .i<%23: ] E A Mi Â»al .... CITY OF ASPEN, COUNTY OF PITKIN, STATE OF COLORADO ~ CONCRETE TE111'HONE LINF T 0, UNE FENCE UNE " t~ ~ ~Â» Â·1Â·:t: 4-!~*vAWRM,WiLTS<" Fl.AGSTOKE SYMBOL LEGEND PAVERS â€¢00 ),URSE , 1~Â· , N FLEâ„¢CMEIER 00 4 .,\MmUUU,LUD/,A. , . V.q(.:1 \ i /1 &31 Â°lk.RHLiNG GAS METER O I SPOT ELEVATON ... - 4915 6- .d f .1 i. CONTROL *11 w:OOD I~ST o 5.J2. CEMETERY LN & 3. . '.,,,1'' ~' COA CONTROL SILVER ING DR WOOD DECK FIRE HYDRANT W -:21<. ... .9*;I---t Â·bAspen / ,92 e y 77%20 MA11 BOX m 5/ RADIUS 1\ #,1 60 Strall viST' DRIVE. ~ ~ 1 \\ ASPHALT (TYP) -0- 1 I Mt /,t #30 Ve 5 Ha VICINITY MAP 47.7 - TREE CHART OE- TELE.-1 - -/C \ f St ALE: r = 1500 FED \13 e - R-90 E TREE TYI'E TRUNK DIA. DRIP DIA BASE ELEV \ ELEâ‚¬ 1 4 RECEIVED #SREBAR.CAP / 1-1 1 TR.4NSaqi ~ I CONIFER . 30' 7.70 2 CONIFER 20Â·Â· . 7/8.0 L S #6808 -TBM - / 0 k 3 DECTDUOI SX2 12 785*.1 EL-7833 .9 #3 RF-BAR 240 7 /4 3 DECTDUOUS 6Â· 12' 7//5 4 DECIDUOU' 6Â· 13Â· 78/ 5 l 6 DECH)rolti 14Â·Â· 34Â· 7.7 7 \ APR 2,1 2014 ilÂ·'2'I,50 7 CONIFER 10- 16Â· 7/7.3 $ tti 110 I 8 DECIDUOU< 14" 24' 7857.0 4 1 4 DECIDUOU' 14" 24' 7857 8 1/1 10 DECIDUOU; 4" 24Â· 7857 7 n 4 7-- 1 CITY OF ASPEN s N D-1..... 14 24' 7107.7 11 DEC1Dull,% 14 24' 337.6 /1 13 DE{'IDUOUS\4 14" 24' 7857.H 0 1 /\ COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT GRAPHIC SCALE 13 DECID 0 7837.9 14 DEADUOU, 8" 16' 337.7 /1 DECIDLOUS 14 24 16 DMIDUOUS,4 14 24' 7857.6 10 0 a 17 7837.7 7 \0\\-- 19 CONIFER 24' 44 7857,3 10 CONWER 24'Â· 0 7837.3 Â· i/ f .~ ---NL J \\ ~ 22 DErn,tolls W 0 1831.3 ( IN FEET) 20 DEnDUOUS Ir 24' 7837.2 1 inch - W k I DECIDUOUS 12Â·' 24 7857,2 st ,i.DE'$. --1 1 26 DNIDUOUSX2 ir 14 la563 21 DECU)UOUS . tr- 78373 ... 1 ' 11. t' fUZZ~ -- - C Â· -<F__ _._1837,3- Â· 0 7856,0 4 ~ ~ ~ T f DE('It)VOUSU ?1,56.4Â· 27 1 ,) CAP L.5 3 - 16) 29 DECIDUOUS _ 6" 12' 785;6.4Â· 1-0[ 34 ",~ r LOT l. WEST Afâ€¢PI N SU BDIV]loN, Fll.BI N{1 1. AC{ OR[}iM, 10 1 11. 1 HE FLA-[ RM 0111)fl, 30 DECTDUOUS 12" 24' 7856.4 C| ALI)| M & (RE~t A CONNER TRUST 1//15>/ < , & ./ ,!: L I RER,Rt * Al!.M PROPER.1-Y W.SCRLPTION: 28 08(fliuouN - ir 14 7336 3 \ 4, lilli SEPTEMBER 3. 1067 IN PLAT BC~K 3 AT PAOB 232, Cl n OF ASPEN. COUNTÂ¥ 01 PITKIN, WATE, 31 DECIDUOU'; ir 24' 7,136.4 ~ OF Cot.ORADO I DECIDUOUS r 24 7855.4 P{i BOX 344 po 4. / 33 CON/Elt 2. 41 7*562 ~SPFN:COSI012 ~. 3/ I. i | 1 4 -TE / 'Vi / 1 34 DECIDUOUS :4" 28' 7!0339 33 DECIUOUS 14Â·Â· 38' 7853.8 -T,--- 11 36 DECIDUOUSIC . 7~53.7 \ 4 NOTF.S: 37 CONIPER 24" 40Â· 7/3,8 DECID/Ot. FENCE 38 14 27 7/7.0 ITYP.) / 1~ 4 1 '1 31 1, THIS PROPERâ„¢ IS SUBJEO Â·IÂ·OHESERVATIONS. RESI'RICTIONS.COVENANTS. BUILDING BAY Â® SETRACKS IND CASEMENTS OF RECORD,OR IN P[.ACE AND EXCEPTTONS TO TITLE SHOWN IN 39 DECIUOUNX' 8" 24Â· 793.3 WINIX,W THI: ITLE COMMIThiENT PREPARED InÂ· MTKIN COUNTY TITM. r'IC.. NO PCT23*41%*3, DAJED 40 DROIDIJOb 14 . ?R53 4 m.,1 1/ 1 1. PFF]Â·CTIVE OCTOBER """3 4 DECIDUILIS N 28Â· 353.6 7,153.8 ~ 4 42 DECE}Colls }4" 28 ASPHALT PENCE 21 THE DITE OF THH; SURVEY WAS J/NUARV 29. 2014 ri-,p, 1 / rm,i 3, BASIS OP B[ARINGS FOR nUS SURVEY IS A Bedull OF 613'04'41-8 BETWEEN THE 44 DEC,DUOM 14 28' 7855.7 43 DECILOM 14 /' 71(35.7 0 \ NORI HEIST CORNER OF LOI 33. AIREHAR FOUâ€¢.D IN PLACE AND THE AN(I.E POINT IN THE 45 DECillar 14Â· 28' 7853 + EAS TE.RI.Y 1* )UNDARY OF LOT 33. A â€¢3 REBAR HZ-ND N M.ACE 46 CONIFER IR' 26' 7*53.0 JI-k 47 CONFER . /0 7%35.7 / it 1.-r 4)UNITS OF MEASUREFOR ALL DIll 49(.5 SHOU N HEREON IS U S SURVEY 'll Â· Â·Â· 48 DECIDUOUS W 28' 7853.0 * I RANGE 4/. / REC,~RDER'SOFI-]CEANDC(,RNERS F,)1]NDIMACE ,! DECti)UOU'; 12 24' 785Â·45 53 nt,5 SLRVEY IS BASED ON -rHE. WEST t,SPIN SUBINVISION, Fll.ING NO I PLArRECORDED 44 CONmER NÂ· 24 ?854.7 SEP'I EM111Â·A 3. li67 1N PLAT BOOK .1 AT Pill: 252 ]N rHE PITKIN COUNTY CLERK IND 33 4,63 . . 4 II -7838.44 50 DECIDUOUS 12' 24' 32.7 / 32 DE/]DUOL,Â·;X2 10" m 7~154.9 A 9 / 'b M EL E .VA 1 IONS AKE BASED ON THE MESA COUNTY R/RN NEÂ·TWORK (CO/),i 988 1).Al UM 20 7855.1 33 DECIDIOUNX 3 9 ORTHO) Â¥r.LDING AN ONÂ·SrTE Et.EVATION OF 7853 $ ON NORâ„¢WESTERLY CORNER AS CAVI.}VAR 4.6, // il .\ :1 SHOWN. 34 DECIDUOUN 18Â· 8' 135 1 DECIDUOUS )2Â· 24Â· 7854.7 /111 Â¥1~ANOF, E.-7850,37 7 THERE WASAPPRIXIMITILY 30â€¢ OF SNOW AND K E ON THE (}ROUND llÂ· THE Tl,F OF S DECIDUOUN Ir 24' 78547 SURVEY m CONIFER w m ?8536 / 1\\ GARAGE FF 0 1 k ~ ~ 4 7 ' > <z 38 DIC]DUOUS 12" 24' 7854.9 LOT 33 HLâ€¢,7837.~3 Bl THI PROPEATY 13 ZONED R.1 ~ AND BUtl.DINO SETBACKS SHOWN VE ACCORDNG TO THr 1 CCWTFir, CITYÂ· OF ASPEN ZONED DISTRICTS 26.-10Â·010 BIN.DING ShmACKS SHOUU) Bl VERIFIrn PRIOR 39 DECIUOUS 10" /1 7401 2 ~ LOT 33 / , W{) 81 ORY 24. J. 1 Hf]PKINS (JOINDIJ ASS{C TO ANY CONSTRUCTION 60 DEC]Duous 1 8 35' 7856.6 MICK & WOOD 1443 SERRA VISTA DR 61 CONWER 1 2" 24' 7857,6 Q / t'mi BASMMT 63 DECTDIOLS !43' 78538 FRAME HOLISE ~ ~ Alply, alfi~ + 9 DEC!DUOUS 14Â· 24' 7856,4 0 ) 7833* 1473 WERRA VISTA DRIVE. / 64 Delcots 6" 12' 7856,2 20 r IMPROVEMENT SURVEY STATEMENT: 65 DECID.O.K. 101' \-Fl ANGE I HEREWr STAI THAT THIS iMPROVEMENT SURVEY WAS PRI Â·PARED HY PEAK SUI~VFYIN,1. INC 06 DECIUOUS*2 12 1 7831,2 11 4 2, i FORA[IMI MOD(rES, 11,ANIJANETS HOIX,FS 67 DECIDUOUS 12" ~ W 7837.2 4 60 COMPER /. 34' 7857.i 1 FURTHER STATE T HXr THE I M PIU.,VI'MINTS ON Â·r ME ABOVE DES,-Â·RIBED PARcrt, oN THIS DATE 69 DECIDUOU SK= 6 12' 7115Â·UL JANUARY 29. 20,4, EXCE.M- UTILITY CONNECTIONS. ARE ENTINET Y WITHI THI HOUADARIES OF 70 DECIDUOUS ir -w 7857.1 / \ 1 THE PARi EL. EX[ 1Â¥r AS SHOWN, THAT THERE ARE NO EN~ RO. ~ IthliNTS ZIPe; THE DES( RiBED PREMISE,BYIMPROVâ„¢ENTSINAN'.ADJOININGPRBIB, rxlÂ·EPT ASINDILAT,D. ANDTHAT I DECIDUOR O :4' 757.1 p K PARTOF BAIDPARLILL EX< EPTASNOTED 1 FURT,lat STATETHAT I HAVE EXAMâ„¢liDTHE mLE 73 DECIDUOUS 14" 24 ?1156.4Â· / WELL 9, THERE IS NO APPARENT EVIDEM E OR SIGN OF ANY EASEMENT CROSSINO OR ILRDIÂ· NINO A NY 72 DECID/OUS 14- 24Â· 7836.1 2,- 1. COM~â„¢ENT PR EP.,RED BY PITKIN COUNn' mi E. B I NO PilÂ·2441 Wa, D AT ED EFFF/TIVE -4 CO VER 14 24' 7%56.3 73 CON,PER 14Â· 24' 7%563 â€¢5 REBAR & ALUM CAP LS. 4 ILLUHBLE - 0, N e.Â« 1 iTYP) 77 DECIDIÂ·OUS 1/ 29 7%56.3 r** 4 n FENCE 1//STHAN 1 /.11,10 76 DECIUOUS 1/ 24Â· 71156.3 ' ~ -, 8 \ ASHED V HOT Tue / / 4 80 DECIUOUS 10" 21 7856.3 DCTOB ER 3I . 10,1 1. AND FIND ALL EXCEPT IONS i n TITL E TIA r Al''I EX T THE Sl BJECT PROPERI :,141Â· SHOWN HEMFON TO TH] BrÂ·ST OF MY KNOW[ EDGE AND BELIEF THE ERRON OF CLOSbmE IS 78 COFFER 12' 24' 7856.3 79 DEr]DUOL S Hy 20 7,36.3 44/LPA 1 81 DECIDUOUS 10Â·Â· 20 7856.4 1 9 // $ // // ,/. N IN131(98~(s NO e. 83 DECIDUU< 4 14'Â· 2MÂ· 7856.5 BÂ¥ # ~ 21 L~v,Â·,~ 82 DECIDIOU<4 . XI' 7856.5 44,%/ // F#19' 02.1914 (~v 84 DECIDE, OVS 8' 16 ?1136.3 96 DEC]DIOLT< 16' ?856.5 Poil L &45-0 87 DECIDUOUS 12" 24' 0/37.0 80 DECIDUOUS 12 24 78599 B DEnDUOUS 84 14 N?56.3 'R DECID.OUS 12. 24' 7857.3 4. ~ tr .19 I 1 91 CONIFER H 78570 / CO~FER 14" N /56.3 x CLRVE RAD1US LENGTH rANGENT CHORD BEARING DELTA . CONIFIER 14" N 78570 :1 .... I- \ ~ CS" PEAK 2 02/19/1 UPDATE SURVEY JRN 93 DECIDUOUS 4' 11' 7837.2 1 .714 1 CURVE TABLE 94 DECHIOUS N 24' 7838.3 m':.Ul 01 jo.ou 46.17 231,0 44.73' S 81'44'ZO E 53/MID9' - 02 21000Â· 13843 82.97 134.33 S 74,39" E 43/7/1 1 -- Daie Remion Project NO. Driwn ByÂ· 50. B, -294. ---- ~ ~~ /* TJK ALLEN L HODGES. Ill & JANET S, HODGES TlE RETADell CITY OF ASPEN, COLORADO 1 02/0//14 ADD IT F 1. Ev ATION S JRN LOTi b ASPEN GOLF COURSE: WAL [ (TYP ) - Oiccked & 14005 t]0 S. GALENA St JRN IMPROVEMENT & TOPO SURVEY ASPEN.COS:6ll 1 - Date - ~ Surveying, Inc. ~ LOT 33. WEST ASPEN SUB., FLG NO. 1 JANUARY.M.2014 < 1â‚¬~~ - . PO- Box 1746 - Rifle, CO 81650 ]475 SIERRA VISTA DRIVE I OF 1 ImMRUCHD~FC, 1/NOPW,TMA~ An teâ„¢JNMAB,inmNANÂ¥DF~kY,I Phone (970) 625-1954. Fax (970) 579.7151) , /1./.1 h. THI,SUR'rÂ¥11, rOMâ€žI, linMORF THAN Tpl.,1 4RSFR0,Ii,f~ â€žtr, 0,7Hr ' I REBARI ALIJAI 17â€¢MIIPÂ«'llnhSÂ¢*WiNI4~NklÂ». \ CAPL.S, fULLIGHILE .F:.peaksurveyinginc com 005.DWO , .82Â·46~H) S :. .r/1,/I.- iRRA VISTA DRIVE , 0/\ 4 ZONE Y RADIUS / ASPHALT 1 j \ / I ~L~ / I /\ \ / I \ / + N ' CU \ \ \ \ 1 / \ \ t. I .... ARCHITECTS 12 LLC - N P,O. BOX 2508 EXISTIN' iNL"A ~-b -â‚¬3~'9---r- %1 \ EXIST1NG TELEPHONE PEDESTA,1 -<f\,2 .--- % \1. WWW.ZONEAARCHITECTS.COM ASPEN CO 81612 7 + AL \ A-> EXISTING ELECTRONIC TRANcruitâ€¢:â€¢ 1 4 - 1 51 - OUTUNE Ur c.yel,1,4 ASPHILT DRIVEWAY - / r 1 I .. LQI-22 /h Â£2/ . 1,11 2 1 'r,6 I N : r, ' N \ 00 1 0. \ n 4-14// 7857.... \>01,~\ lil 1/2 1 -7- -- - 0 '3 \ \\ lil O // 1~~GE ENTRANCE\ 50 1 O \\ .r # 1 t,f=.21 - - 1 ---1- . 9> 11'' 11=T Â»4.'..2,1- f.f>\\V t.litt.--U ' I u 2 z EXISTING ROOF OVER6, iu,Â·.L.L'/ Ly Â· 1 (COVERED ENTRY PORCH) - k Ul TO BE DEMOLISHED !!!a 00 // ~ ~ ~~~///~:~1 ~ ~~<a~BM.F. MAINLEVEL 4 4 -- --- h \ I 1.QI-M ' <00 . 044 0, rÂ» 3 - - 9%449 El : -1 9: \ I /Â« 7 1 r-im 1 = -- 6*Â»411 - E;OSTING ROOF OVERI IAI4/ ADOVE TO BE DEMOLISHED ' a /11/J 1 4-1 Â»17Â¥* O 11 / 301 ' 1./ 9 ' 1 EXISTING UPPER LEVEL DECK ABCVIE c.] 134#,rm,-1.-* 11' 41 +12 Jit ~ I _ 1/3 / 18,0Wh tqi> To BE ngâ€¢n, 19,Fr, / f Â£161.11"7 9 0..L /- 82/ 11717i(07% EXISTING TWOMY_~'31 3 / - 14>44*iliâ‚¬1*29<1 ' 4 BRICK & '409 4 /923 C4%2212UESNt --43 01 -, 2,5-54#*4.Â¥1 05-KI.-714~7 .4...:0 A , 1/r- .-1 - 4 . 12 / - 19 0 41â€¢'* 2 32Â» -un 1, 1475 SIERRA VISTA DRIVE ZO ///FBI 4-4( 2, 2- 4 11 ---4 - d /01 1.-1, /t/t \ t* n - - - -- 01 DESIGN VAR.]4.04.14 BY REVISIONS DATE A-Â·' EXISTINC ....... [,C.-1[ 1 11 11 TO 8E DEMOLISHED _h J <h.r 1 1 114 2 0 - - - - - 11 11 . . U 0 0 EXISTING WINDOWÂ¥,ELL - ' ' . D TO BE DEMOLISHED 11 3 11 ----- EXISTING BASEMENT ACCESS L./. Â· / 1 . , \ L 4 43> 1-xt Â· TO BE DEMOLISHED \__1 / - Drawn by ~ Z4A 0 - 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 ASPEN EXISnNG HOT TUB TO 82 0[MOUS,1[D - I -6 6 1QL.1 RESIDENTIAL DESIGN EXISTING FENCE ~ VARIANCE ASPEN GOLF COURSE APPUCAION N \ \-- 4 4 00 11 4 SHED TO BEE DEMOLISI ICI I LOT BOUNDARY - - t 10' ULLITY EASEMENT 1 \F r N EXISTING - - ~ SITE PLAN ; '61 EXISTING SITE PLAN SCALE. 1/8" = 1'.0 A101 U CD nE RETAINING VA,ALL Â£.PICAL) ./ 0 P'lotted OnÂ· <'2014 R , .....\ 1 3 A1%10 VISIA VE SIBIS 9Â£*t # **%/My,Â¥3?asNOdsÂ»110.9,1.IONS,11Â¤au.1. '3110; Z:Whared~CataLZ* Projecti~Hodges\ModiIA,chh,201+04-02 Hodges G,rage P-Â·App.pin Z \Sharnd!,DItaL,ZI ProjeÂ¢(s~Hodges~Model,Afrhhe 201+04Â·02 HÂ©**s Get,ge Pi-Arm.pin -I: 1.- â€¢ ....4 1. 0 -. ... . . I ... *0 . . .. a .... I . . 4 .. 14* 1 , I. .: .-. am--2 -4'j'*044 6,~ \1* .- 4/11,1/1/'ll-.1 -1/11/"imvilimmwl:.elit/"f.y:1~0/91"i'.Ir:imibmit'/1/ A.&, 17 9 *b1-*~-4*1~.~~-w*~-&*31*23*1*~ j~".~.',i' .,41. 4/,CK#/44*AA#01*0#W,/ . 4~#Al/:dan'll, '22=1â€¢*PA~*-0. . 1 -~4 ~ff.AMPV- ..Lia:tilipliqui#1 It U . 4* I J"c"~imptai j,y I I --1050*43,7,"dia ... 1 . .. . I. 11 . 0. - -6- 090*lilirl.li,allillif~~.,&- ... 0 -2.,29, , -F .AV/t-*i~4~~ 1 - -** ar . I . . .. -4-74.--.~AW*~1~Â£4, 11- -- 11"*k. , 4~~~ V 74'Al.,-~14**le*~11,; ...1.5.... 0 . e.%9,1,~ '..Â¥4*':':,4Â» C 1 :411'll~....~11'4011<41 ibixid@*M3741Â¥24%1@NK ,~~~~ V Â· 391~ " 0 ~ ' ' 4. . . â€¢ X/UNZA~*""8"MA/44*A *M"40/*"5= - 7â‚¬6~*4214,%92,2##9*04*~ . /,4.0 F--% 4:2 / I ..... 1 ...... . I (D - -9mt@Wicil-* 0 A . -'-i -----r . 1 ' UJ ZONE / f / f / B~ SIERRA VISTA DRIVE / \ / SIERRA VISTA DRIVE A K 50 RADIUS / ASPHALT (TYP.) . * 50 RADIUS ' ASPHALT (TYP.) / \ / \ .- 1 1 /1 I / \ I. / 1. I \ \\' I. \ 21 21 ' I \ 'h \ I *. / 5 ARCHITECTS / / L L C. 0 2 . I ~'-~ 7855 ~*il ASPEN CO 81612 P.O. BOX 2508 - ~ ,,~ ... WWW.ZONEAARCHITECTS.COM / K * . / \ \ I \ ' I i / 1 \ O. CENTERLINE OF , I, r ./ -ULB-DARY' ~/ ,\, 4. 0... 7 NORTH LOT BOUNDARY' 1 / \ 1\ -1 /...f \4 :I -L---- 1 .\ ' \ N \ 49 , 0 .... / \ .... \ ..1 \ \, I 1 1 40 1 \ ..A . 1 /\, l /4 \ , /1 \ 1 \ / ....1 / --1 1 1 , I 1 \ / - \ ' . \ + / .1.0 \ \ / \I' \#/1 3_ / \\ _1- -** . I \\ 1 --- \ ..,~'. 0 1 - - / T ... \\\ 1 \ \ \ \ i. \ \\\ 1 X \ \ \I 1 - I I 1 1 111 1/ / i.. .100. \\ 1 $ ' FÂ·* \10' 4% I N \\ 1 &0065 ' Â·--- 7856 ---'.~ ' ' \ ,.V,-b \ 1 -Â¢00 7856 ------.. ,~ \ \ 0. -1 - .0 -1660,4 : ,1--i \ -- - 0 -id*u.V 1- 00 /1 \ ---- ..1 ' 4 00\ 1 ---- 21 - ~ I. I I \ 0 2 1 ------ I t>\\ \ :" 1--*---- 100 1 1 ./6 2 : \ 1 58 1 \ ' 1 ~4 \1~ \1 \\ \ 4 \ 19 \ 1 \\ 1 1 \ 7 1 / 1 0 7855 \ \ ---- 7856 ------------ - --------- 1 4 1,1 \ Of Ill / I / \ ...arÂ· / \ \ / \ .. . / 0 0 ./ 1.----'. 7856 10 4 / \\ 1 / / i \ 1 11./.....0-- / / \I . 0 I . . ---- ----- - \ \,i\ r ---- , \ ./ 57 \ - EXISTING DRIVEWAY , iN ; d L_ EXIST~NG DRIVEWAY Ox 0 1 TO REMAIN '' 1 TO REMAIN 1 , \ \ \44 4~ ; \ .w------------ ~ 9,1 ---1 ' ..... ......------1.- -- , \ et. 1 1 ; 1.1 1 101 ' \ - EXPANDED AREA OF \ PROPOSED GARAGE 7857. --- 7867. --- 1-* 1 1 .. >7- ,?4* 7 0 , 6 - L *Â£%,%5, Â·, BY REVISIONS DATE I - '77 .ef. 01 DESIGN VAR .4.04.14 PROPOSED GARAGE EXISTING GARAGE - f 14*Ket -at ~*%FÂ¢89*~ 1 2 Drap.n by: | Z#A mum I ASPEN 1 , 9 ..... 1 1 ./.r ZIEZZE' tÂ· RESIDENTIAL DESIGN - VARIANCE , nfl- APPLICAHON . 1 N SITE PLANS 02 MAIN LEVEL FLOOR AREA ~62\ MAIN LEVEL FLOOR ARE~ E-9 0 SCALE 3/16" = 1'-0" SCALE: 3/16" = 1-0Â· ZE A103 Pbtled On 4/3/2014 Ug~3Â¢3~ SDa~UÂ¥ C~Â¥3.*UDOONOn,J-1-Nm -%. -.01~Ails 1,01~ Â·01191%= Noz Â·011 ~03.11110,Â¥, â„¢02 .1,~m/~d H,i~Â¥.~ Vm,~ulnolu-C,~0,0 0*n.A-,Â« u-~0,~ *~ iollvdol,Â·01, uoiu,1~~~02,0 kledo,i,1u m l a~,1000 6â€žU NO O3,~VANOol,3,~ NDIG30 0-1,~~.10~ 13,u Â· . HoMV,-0 Zita. BAIZICI Â¥1SIA Â¥hIHEHS 94*K 78/> - 499Â£ ZAShareclDatiLZâ€¢ Projet:.mdi,5Noil*,bbi,1281*â‚¬]442 Hodgi, Gar- 9 ARCHITECTS LLC P. O. BOX 2508 ASPEN CO 81612 I . WWW.ZONE4ARCHITECTS.COM EXISTING GARAGE DOOR---d , T.O. ENTRY LANDING ! 1,- ,6 A00'-Cy' fIQE.11 9AE,Lit A ENTRY L___ cp -rEF.F. MAIN LEVEL V CEIUNGA.F.F. IEUNG~A.F.F. OFFICE EXT 2!ml Â§I~Ul : 7 Ul 7 2 D V T.O. F.F. GARAGE LEVEL . N I Or - n ON 1 r-00 1 - 0 58 11 1 U 1-m CN I 1 -Cr , UMINa /01 7 -- -- EQQM . LU -4- Ny c7 KITCHEN -- - - 1.~ [13 eWDR ____ 1 - I 7-4 V 1 DEN TOF.F. DEN LEVE 1 1. BY REVISIONS DATE 01 DESIGN VAR,]4.04.14 A M --â€¢11 r---lil NOTEÂ· ARCHITECTURAL FINISH FLOOR F.F.) 100'-0" = SITE ELEVATION 7858.44 Drawn byÂ· 24A ASPEN RESIDENTIAL DESIGN VARIANCE APPUCATION EXISTING MAIN N LEVEL FLOOR 5+ EXISTING I MAIN LEVEL PLANO PLAN SCALE, 1/4" = 1-0 A301 N. -------------- --------------.21111111111~~ 3Alkla Â¥1SIA Vkl BBIS 9Zn als sz.L .Wm lâ„¢~all,013..1Hal'.00-OmON St-Il./.- ul'. 0,NA~Clnli.*10-0011V#BWni. .191,3UINÂ¥,~02 0Usl~~0Â¥V,31.02 30,0,SS:M~3'~31tleA~[*.3~14falUMQ~00~00@.3*A-NOU-*Im,u.1~Vd OM /~8101UM,-,3,402 JOkâ„¢3dOW...1,E380000/,1-03#%11.M6300**Â¥~0,/9~4 01~ *103,1HD-.* I~UE 2-,SharedÂ£>atÂ»LZA Projecltllod//9**44/chÂ»*1201404Â·02 Hodge, Garage Pre-App.pIn 140,1. lo,un. Pal.U,IM Mon,4 ir,O,UN~9,(OuÂ¥01,!0.dS ~lo 30,1â€ž~0,93,uol g*]HVM' ANÂ¥ aa:i a,Ill A.M. 9,10493~ ~0 3~9Â¥,1101, 9, &133UW.Â¥, @No + MI~ CL ARCHITECTS LLC. P. O. BOX 2508 ASPENCO81612 1 1 ,//tililittill,l' VWVW.ZONE4ARCHITECTS.COM oN NEW GARAGE DOOR - AREA OF EXPANDED GARAGE - 9 OUTLINE OF--1 2 EXTERIOR WALLABOVE ~ ENTRY STOOP GARAGE NOTE' ARCHITECTURAL FINISH FLOOR (F.F.) 100'-0 = SITE ELEVATION 7858.44' < 244 11 0 -DN / 1 00 1, 1 ,, MUQ ~ BATH #1 3 ~.3-2 / D. - 11/ TO. F.F MAIN LEVEL I ~~*~3 1.-----1 1 . ~~ ENTRY ~ --- --1 ' '"~-ai-1 - l. 1 ~ C=Is 1 r-- I 9'30 - C w 1 1 1 1 =n Z TMn - --r Aw,1,c, E-1: 1 .221\ 1.-~- 1 98'-10 1/4 -v-no. F.F. GARAGE LEVEL 1 SIQB MS. BTHRM. ~%,/~~~ I N 0. ' i=u UL r~- Af - 0 4/11-1 0 1 a---- 1 1 ~ts,4 ~ 72. DINING 58 1 1 OP 1 -- 1â‚¬1 ENK ' 1 ..7. 1 BDRM. #1 OUTLINE OF | | | 1 -'-M. W.I.C. #2/ 1 M. W.I.C.#'1: 1 / CEILING ABOVE 1 ---~ L 1 1.- 1 1 U.1 - L_ ..[ZJ r. .-/. U) U) râ‚¬% 1 '0 ~ 1 00 4 1=e- 1 ~MSTR LEVEL lo 1 1 . , - 4 1 r 9.p . m - - - 1 1/El - a 1 OUTLINE OF- .4 1 LIVING ROOM EXTERo wA ~ ~ SITT ING MS, BDRM, ABOVE BDRM, #1 PATIO 6 ' KITCHEN i I 1.-1 3/4. 1 i. 1 - 1 -T37,0,DEN LEVEL 1 6 - 11 0 1 1 I] - 1 1 1 1 1 BY REVISIONS DATE I 01 DESIGN VAR 24.04.14 00 1 1 - ' L________-'ll.--_--__----7- A -OUTUNE OF ROOFABOVE LIVING / KITCHEN MASTER PATIO NZ â‚¬ PATIO H Drawn by: ~ Z4A f EABQ DESIGNT.B.D BY LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT ON H , 11 IL ASPEN *~ RESIDENTIAL DESIGN ~1 VARIANCE w APPLICATION . PROPOSED N MAIN LEVEL PLAN ~ PROPOSED I MAIN LEVEL PLAN /Th SCALE: 1/4" = 1'-0 A302 03~am..~17~Â·0....MelÂ¥.0081Â®.19~ ..'0*..83.0, 64-2.*tr- Â£%=122 ~11:,7-~tri:hÂ°AyÂ°.'I'.~::7:Â·'42 BAING Â¥1SIA V 94.1. Z:\Shared,Datal-Zi Projects~Hodg,*UllodeIA,chweell+04Â·02 Hodges Garage P, /1 -a B .Â£3 - EXISTING GARAGE FACADE CL BELOW ARCHITECTS LLC. OUTUNE OF BAY VUNDOW - P.O. BOX 2508 ROOF BELOW ASPEN C081612 TO BE DEMOUSHED - - 1--------------n WWW.ZONE4ARCHITECTS.COM 11 11 - ~ - OUTUNE OF ROOF BELOW TO BE DEMOLISHED 1- -OUTLINE OF STRUCTURE - BELOW TO BE DEMOUSHED 1 -1 1 1 L---1 1 1 1 1 1 1 lu 1 ' I Z 1 1 1 k slopl ,~ Â¤ N 1 1 1-60 U) - 1= 0 CHIMNEY TO BE DEMOLISHED ~ ~ ~ I N - A ' 7 419 60 2.z CE u.1 !!! a - - OUTLINE OF ROOF CD â‚¬ 0 0 TO BE DEMOUSHED, TYPICAL 10 4---------7----7---------- - EXISTING t .r | - DECK - ... BELOW EXISTING ~ - DECK - 1 BELOW Wk f 1 1 1 1 BY REVISIONS DATE â€¢ -OUTLINE OF ROOF BELOW TO BE DEMOUSHED 01 DESIGN VAR.04.04.14 1 L---- ..... -j--i--------2 . OUTUNE OF STRUCTURE BELOW TO BE DEMOUSHED Dravn by: ~ 24A Fi 5E ASPEN li RESIDENTIAL DESIGN 9% VARIANCE % APPUCATION h Z% iG 5% :. N EXISTING ROOF 4 PLAN .a /6-il EXISTING I ROOF PLAN ~ 9 SCALEÂ· 1/4" = 1,-cr' m. A303 iE .. 03~3& 81.0./ Clia..1./.00./.014 ..,03/,39. ...11Â¥ ONÂ¥ W*K~~0011~~VUln-: 01191021110~V~aND' DllWiDE~-0*02 .14(*S~m'NUU--kU!*00~00*n3,1.MOU.~0&.*-011 adOlS , aAIM a 9Â£.1, SLOPE Z Whai*/Dat<ZI Projects~Hodgis*loder,AfÂ¢hh,2014<)4Â·02 Hodges Garage Pre-App.pin OULTING OF NEW ENTRY / GARAGE ROOF 8ELOW CIL NCW GARAGE WALL BELOW ARCHITECTS LLC. P. O. BOX 2508 ASPEN CO 81612 1:48 . OUTLINE OF UPPER LEVEL STRUCTURE BELOW WWW.ZONE*ARCHITECTS.COM : 4-OPEE i 11 METAL ROOF, TYPICAL Â· i 42 1 MEMBRANE ROOF OVER SLOPED RIGID INSULATION, TYPICAL LU : ' - OUTUNE OF WALL BELOW ~ --------- - OUTLINE OF ROOF BELOW O 2 1.48 , 9 N SLOPE Of 1:48 1 1 1:48 , - 1-00 &V~ SLOPE B O ---- - - - - --4 6 4 1 SLOPED RIGID INSULATION, ~ ~ Z , MEMBRANE ROOF OVER 744-- TYPICAL -W 1 U) 0 1 1 . I i i METAL ROOF BELOW, TYPICA 1 1 ..19 --- ------------ L-- DECK BELOW- 1 ri.1 0~2 uB 1 jil BY REVISIONS DATE 01 DESIGN VAR.04.04.14 2 5% iE J~ 9, 35 OUTLINE OF DECK GUARDRAIL BELOW Â§~ CHIMNEY CHIMNEY OUTLINE OF STRUCTURE BELOW Drav,n by: | 24A ~~ OUTLINE OF ROOF ~i RESIDE~~-DESIGN ~~ 5g VARIANCE APPLICAMON @i M N PROPOSED L ROOF PLAN |i ~ PROPOSED I ROOF PLAN /Th , SCALE: 1/4" = 1-0' 1 U 2% A304 d SLOPE hi 9Â£.t ZAShirs<ADat<Zl Proldsmodge:lod,Mihhe 2014-0402 Hodges Gaigo ne-App.pin CU ARCHITECTS LLC. E -a---21 P. 0. BOX 2508 ASPEN CO 81612 29 HEIGHT LIMIT WWW.ZONE4ARCHITECTS.COM F~-0-lioUE---11 / 0 \ --21 ,Fl 111: Ill m 1 1 --- ]F==711 --- 11- -- 1 EXISTING / FINtSH GRADE , "07/Fl r=-OFTE-1- ILl L T r ~1- --[F~-7-1----1Ef---Irr--~ -------------------L~ d 1 1 1 'WuAGE LEV. NEWADDITION BEYOND---~ ~-NEWENTRY FAUDE BEYOND L...EL..:Mat -al.EwL 2 L----- NEWGARAGE FACADE NEWGARAGE DOOR E N 43 1- Ir, 1 ...'.F'to#/LE'.L 0 58 ~ PROPOSED I NORTH ELEVATION 2 2 w SCALE: 3/16- = 11-0 E a U.1 00 0 4 10 6.....4 12 m , Fl 10,6/.I ---------- -61/-- / - I TO, U. ENTRY.E'wEL <* 12 - ] Li- - BY REVISIONS DATE 01 DESIGN VAR. 04.04.14 -- EXISTING GRADE - ~ ~ 11, PACADE ZEY'ORD 'ToÂ·FADEHLE~L I To "GE Laâ‚¬L E)(18T1NG GARAGE FACADE Dravm by: | Z4A EXISTING GARAGE DOOR ..1 8LMr ASPEN - - 'To.FF.loWERLEV. RESIDENnAL DESIGN VARIANCE APPUCATION ~ SCALE: 3/16'Â· = 1'-0 NORTH EXISTING I NORTH ELEVATION ELEVATION A401 J0 El/\Ikla VlSIA 92*10 MILO , 1.- i - La ARCHITECTS LLC P.O. BOX 2508 ASPEN CO 81612 L_-_---- 25Â· HEIGHT LIMIT VMMAZONEAARCHITECTS.COM IM91177il \/1 \ - 1 - --~7577L,â€¢pERiEva-(PROPOSED NEW GARAGE FACADE BEYOND Â¤ Fg Ir.Â·.Â· ENTRY r,Â·csi * 1 - EXISTING M FINISH GRADE LU > ----------------- ---...*g ~ 0Â£ \ .T,OF'-MVEL L+gr-RLEVEL O Z IN 0 . 1- 0 300 4 4 /63% PROPOSED I WEST ELEVATION ~ ~ ~ / SCALE. 3/16" = 147 UJ 00 0 â‚¬ Ul 10 6311 m m Cont * fl 1- 1/7 ' T.0 F.F. ENTWLEVEL EXISTINGGARAGE~~: rjE)O- ~ 0 --- - BY REVISIONS DAT'E ~ 01 DESIGN VAR.14.04.14 EXISTING ENâ„¢i ....t Â·~ ~ _ ~ ~ ~ 1 - 1-- -- - ~-=1-2.LL~=2 -2 -2 -2 -23333~.LEVE EXISTING GRADE Â¥TI FF DEN L= Drawn by: ~ Z4A ASPEN RESIDENDAL DESIGN VARIANCE APPLICATION ~ EXISTING I WEST ELEVATION SCALEÂ· 3/16" = 1'-D" WEST ELEVATION A402 9Â£.10 -- -- -- - - ......-="100~UlIl..=1034SUC)gOf./"Hle.LWAW,IVM:Al,r,aW'-,IrrU,d.Ir-Im....,WI'll.4â€žI idillit'11111 |.i||l 1 25'HEIGHT LIMIT crid I /\ /\ ARCHITECTS LLC. I . / I . / P. O. BOX 2508 ASPEN CO 81612 V\NW.ZONE#ARCHITECTS.COM _-___--------__-__Â·-___---_--____ _17- -------- -ew.1~alea.PROPOSED' NEW GARAGE FACADE BEYOND - Il[W,Â·OCITTON FACADE EXISTING /FINISH GRADE , A ll]0â‚¬ ' TO FF. ENâ„¢Â¥.VEL I ~GELEVel | A.al.E ' TT.0Â·~'F..~TERLE~L UJ > ---- ~ --- -- ~-VT'Fk LOWERLEâ‚¬' 0111 0 > 4 Or I N 1- /;+ PROPOSED I EAST ELEVATION M , 60 SCALE 716" = 1'.0" j > >0 0 z Ul LU - :1 0 U, 39933# 1- m Â£ 1.4 1/ Â·-ir---r Â· , jlf< fit-Il.-, 2 - - { - r - 0 BY REVISIONS DATE EXISTING GARAGE FACADE 01 DESIGN VAR. 04.04.14 EXISTING GRADE 1 - - 7 ~-+965V*~ ~Eva ..'......I LEVEL Drawn by: | Z4A ~El. 80-0~ ' T./ Ff. LEMER LEVEL ASPEN RESIDENTIAL DESIGN VARIANCE APPUCAMON tifj EXISTING I EAST ELEVATION SCALE 3/18" = 1,-0 EAST ELEVATION A403 SI WhIMBIS 9Â£*L 11 lili lilli W$ ~Â·â€¢ 0 ' '.*MP.k=k../. *gp.*. t. ~ 4 4 e.Â·~ Aiâ‚¬<Â£ j A. ; k *Â·f~ z ... ~ 5** 0,Â». 9 4 CU Â£t - . 24 'i19&141,9 /APS'Rail ./ ~ ~ -'- -- I 1 - -10 ' . . 1 9/ ..2* I . t . I /d':bel :'Â£~â€¢=câ€¢â€¢ Y. ARCHITECTS - . F Ocrpt"Admi , N 14 LLC BOX 2508 2 -" i ASPEN CO 81612 WWW.ZONE4ARCHITECTS.COM 4,14 2/. : 4.. * .1 94 t Â· . . ... I I :-- I. : i . + / -f T, , ... . 64 /2 ..r , 1- 4 --- Â· 1 9 1 + 1 1 A U % 1 4 1 r '- . r. ,. . . ~. , 60:' '4':b -* U.1 A & 9 P ,1452 -r 1- 1127 1 > Â«a:.t, 2 -w 0 > I~i- 4 .N o. 1- S ~ SCALE Y â€¢ 14 EXISTING PHOTO I VIEW TOWARDS SOUTHWEST EXISTING PHOTO I VIEW TOWARDS SOUTH -C Â£Â£ i ~ SCALE r - 1'4' ~ Iii t Ul 00 0 < do . . 14:i Â¢ ,-Pr -7 1 1. 14Â¥ , 1 414 9. . $ I ' ; f t. . t,/ 1 - ' Il < -,Cf I I .1 Â» . ' ./ .1 Â· .$ 7 3. i I . , 1. % .. k . 57 I . / 1% , -. 11 . BY REVISIONS DATE - 1 â‚¬ 1 2 : ; 0 01 DESIGN VAR. 04.04.14 h t . 7 L... .-- - 4.- -. - ~i~' Â· Dravn by: | 24A ASPEN RESIDENTIAL DESIGN VARIANCE APPUCATION EXISTING ~ EXISTING PHOTO I VIEW TOWARDS SOUTH -8 = . 10 PHOTOS EXISTING PHOTO I VIEW TOWARDS SOUTH - A SCALE: 30 â€¢ 1'.0 A501 Â·*44 2121 1 9LD L Z sh-,do-_24 '*.'Itxdge-od,M, 14Â·0+02 Hodls Galage intern pin .Â£1 - r 7..A&*t~i#'..3Â£0 4 ./. , Ezzrliild f 5,41 4 - ARCHITECTS .4 L L C. 4 , 1 : r . PIa BOX 2508 4 Jb if Â·- .. ' #': WWW.ZONE4ARCHITECTS.COM I 9014'i'. ASPEN CO 81612 1 24 ?:9 -talip/4 46 31 1 UJ 4 . > 1 - - Ul 0 . < IN Or - 0 > 58 ~ PROPOSED I VIEW TOWARD SOUTH V z Ul LU 00 40 , 01 DESIGN VAR.94,04.14 BY REVISIONS DATE t 11-63 A . - Drvn by: |ZAA Â¥if J Ul.~ fllill - 4-r - ASPEN RESIDENTIAL DESIGN VARIANCE APPUCATION liti. 1,1! ,/ir/Zil----1//-7 1 i?.1 - PROPOSED PERSPECTIVES ~ PROPOSED I VIEW TOWARD SOUTHWEST A601 Vk,Mal SZ,L -OPOH 20,0/,02'-4,P'-PO'Iâ€¢-0H\.-foAd ,/7.-P/-1~ Z *- V 0- ~Ol,d lr~,l~,Nall,CUIWS ~0 SO~MV. 393,UOi,@8-,0 A~~0, Â»MU Amil @a@NOdS;M WO 31~nlONS~ Sl~UH~ Â¥ *. V\\ \ \ 1 1 VAN / / 1 , . Snoweuv ./1/.. GBO . 1 4% %\ 1350, ~/ . 4 ~l/tNN/i --- --- t \ ~\ r A.f Fq -.&*- 1 -- 4 / -4* 1 \ 1 1 0 4 0 91 / s e Â· 1 1325 1 800, . 1 tx 1---- ill/// gaff/\\ - -- : 9-:-d"Â· 7 90' \ 9Â»\ \ 1\ 9554 %- j N , V 14 \ R-15 /////812 1345, 1 52 '' / - . I / "~Il*fl//f/llm/m/Ulammul-uLULU_U-lU-lUL/1U1Â«tr,v/Â»-Â«Â«~-te t\-U .\4/ , 4% 0// Â£ 1865, ' 1 1412. i \ 44- E L --- ~ I L... 1 472 ; j-FL t*g A 1432, 4 f l-% le. ~ fF). ~1 Â·-Â· ~-:~2 ~\ v /\% I. ~ 1480. '-'~i , 44/ i '1' -4 1 1 , 1 1 1 . 1 11 6 52' j i 1418, ~~ ~44 0 1 if . 1 % 'IiI, / 1 \ 111% \ \ 8 - / 1417, - Weel Aatce,1 _- -- , 1173 FT r, . I ':# SIERRA VISTA DR R-15 \Â«021 ~ , U--' \ .3/11 7 1Â· / NOTE ~---i:5~ ALL DIMENSIONS ARE ESTIMATED AND ROUNDED OFF TO THE , 85 DISTANCES WERE OBTAINED FROM THE CITY OF ASPEN GIS 87' ~ <~~ 8~\4~ NEAREST DIMENSIONAL FOOT. THESE ESTIMATED I INTERACTIVE WEBSITE, ~ 1445, 'l 4 - r I. Â·':.1.Â·/6 Al - , $ 90, f 1467. e .4 6 22 14<35. '6 V- l jIl11\11\-- 'T . r * I %/ I 1 1475 ~ 1465. - 1 V\ :t..44 \ 4 i 0 N -~ -g -flt/7i/1--1N--INT///I///////////lj////I/f///,f IU.-Â», ~,. -- - --:4117-2-2-777-7->py'~3,//j-~ ~',k / 855, \ -VI + / / / 9-77 T->-7 7-7 7-,77 ~~/7 1475 SIERRA VISTA ~ NEIGHBORHOOD BLOCK PLAN .0 SEE GRAPHIC SCALE I 04 04.2014 .rn, ARCHITECTS