Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutFile Documents.100 Dean St.0056-2021-BCHO (5) Zoning Comments 1 - 100 E Dean St - 0003-2021 -BRES 90.Architectural Plans.100 E Dean St.2020.12.29.pdf(10) Page: 1-CVR COVER Page Index: 1 A meeting with zoning is required prior to M Author: sophiev responding to comments. m,ommm P File Name: 90.Architectural Plans.100 E Dean Met with Sophie,Ken Adler and John Howard St.2020.12.29.pdf on 4/23/21 Page: ERGROUND UTILITIES DMENT NO. C6, OR OTHER as,=a asap° UM ASSOCIATION,A S DEFINED BY T LOCATION OF ALL Please provide a survey that shows setbacks. ' Page Index: 2 Please see zoning checklist for a link to a description of what should be shown on a survey. Author: sophiev File Name: 90.Architectural Plans.100 E Dean 2 new surveys with setbacks included in comments submittal. St.2020.12.29.pdf The Page:Z1.3 DEMO CALCS The methodology for demolition is accurate. I will demobonis'°9Y`°r Page Index: 5 acc�raate°s kthe wait wait to check the arithmetic while the path forward to arithmetic check the Author: sophiev arithmetic while the for the roof is determined. path forward for the File Name: 90.Architectural Plans.100 E Dean roof is determined. St.2020.12.29.pdf Demolition calcs. have not changed with revised building design. Z1.3 IPage:A2.1X EXISTING GROUNDLEVEL PLAN Page Index: 9 Please show setback on East side of building on ""' 71, Author: sophiev all sheets.The existing structure does not project File Name: 90.Architectural Plans.100 E Dean into the setback; the existing eave is St.2020.12.29.pdf non-conforming (I am measuring it on the existing site plan as projecting more than 18" into the setback, see 26.575.020.E.5(g)-Allowed Projections into Setbacks). The veneer of the East setback and gridlines shown on A2.1X-A4.2. building cannot extend into the setback. Floor area is measured to face of framing; setback is measured to edge of veneer(see Figure 2, 26.575.020). Please add orientation gridlines to sheets A2.1 X-A4.2 Page:A2.2X EXISTING SECONDLEVEL PLAN ,,,,� Page Index: 10 What do these rectangles represent? Author: sophiev Existing storage closets. Storage closets will be replaced mum File Name: 90.Architectural Plans.100 E Dean like for like and is noted on A2.2X,A2.3X,A2.2 and A2.3. St.2020.12.29.pdf Page:A2.0 PROPOSED•50GROUND LEVELni am Page Index: 15 The radon, phone, and cable chases add floor ■I area.There is no floor area exemption for chases. Author: sophiev File Name: 90.Architectural Plans.100 E Dean The existing structure is over allowable floor area. St.2020.12.29.pdf These need to be made internal to the existing building. Per emails from Sophie these inaccessible chases are acceptable. Page:A2.2 PROPOSED THIRDLEVEL PLAN Page Index: 17 What is being shown in dark solid black lines as �I Author: sophiev being added on all corners of the building? �"Ilira File Name: 90.Architectural Plans.100 E Dean Framing for the vertical architectural projections,inaccessible. St.2020.12.29.pdf RECEIVED 05/04/2021 ASPEN BUILDING DEPARTMENT Page:A2.3 PROPOSED ROOFPLAN Page Index: 18 Please provide a height over topography sheet. Author: sophiev Provided,sheet Z1.4 - File Name: 90.Architectural Plans.100 E Dean gir St.2020.12.29.pdf Page:A2.3 PROPOSED ROOFPLAN The majority of the building is over the allowed Page Auth Index: 18 Author: sophiev height in the Lodge zone district(28'). • o- File Name: 90.Architectural Plans.100 E Dean ° a© St.2020.12.29.pdf There are two main paths forward differentiated by if any non-conforming structural aspect is removed and to be replaced or not. The building roof has been redesigned and deemed acceptable by planning and zoning. Updated drawings 1)SCOPE: Simple re-roof for normal maintenance. include A2.3-A5.3. Everything below sheathing must remain but waterproofing, insulation, roofing material can be replaced. No structural components of the building that exceed the height limit are removed. PATH: Review through permit. 2)SCOPE: Demolish non-conforming aspects of structure and rebuild to comply with height limit. PATH: Review through permit. 3)SCOPE: Portions of structure that exceed height removed, or 40%demolition is triggered for the site (not close to 40%demolition currently), like for like replacement proposed. PATH: Review before the Planning &Zoning Commission for replacement of non-conformity. 4)SCOPE: Non-conforming aspect of the structure is removed or 40%demolition is triggered and a increase in the non-conformity is proposed (height increased or area exceeding height increases). PATH: Review before City Council then public vote. The current scope would be number 4. Please choose one of the options that can be reviewed via permit or request a pre-application conference summary to start the land use review process. Please note that this only applies to the portions of the structure that exceed the height limit.The South side of the building is below the height maximum. Changes are allowed to all portions of the structure that are below the height limit, including new roof forms or enlarged roof area. The key to avoiding a board review is to maintain the non-conforming portion of the structure or ensure that anything new conforms with the code. Page:A3.1 PROPOSEDELEVATIONS Proposed Page Index: 19 Proposed Elevations West, East, North-see Elevations West, comment on Sheet A2.3 East,North-see Author: sophiev comment on Sheet A2.3 File Name: 90.Architectural Plans.100 E Dean St.2020.12.29.pdf The building roof has been redesigned and deemed acceptable by planning and zoning. Updated drawings include A2.3-A5.3. RECEIVED 05/04/2021 ASPEN BUILDING DEPARTMENT