Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
agenda.hpc.20140924
ASPEN HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION REGULAR MEETING September 24,2014 CITY COUNCIL MEETING ROOM 130 S. GALENA ASPEN, COLORADO SITE VISITS: Please visit 712 W. Francis and 101 E. Hallam on your own. 5:00 INTRODUCTION A. Roll call B. Approval of minutes—September 17, 2014 C. Public Comments D. Commission member comments E. Disclosure of conflict of interest(actual and apparent) F. Project Monitoring G. Staff comments H. Certificates of No Negative Effect issued-none I. Submit public notice for agenda items OLD BUSINESS 5:10 A. 712 W. Francis Street- Temporary On-site Relocation, CONTINUED PUBLIC HEARING NEW BUSINESS 5:30 A. 101 E. Hallam Street- Minor Development and Temporary On-site Relocation, PUBLIC HEARING 6:30 B. 610 E. Hyman Avenue- Final Major Development and Commercial Design Review, PUBLIC HEARING WORKSESSIONS A. None 7:10 ADJOURN P1 TYPICAL PROCEEDING- 1 HOURB SIN TES FOR MAJOR AGENDA ITEM Provide proof of legal notice (affidavit of notice for PH) Staff presentation(5 minutes) 'Board questions and clarifications (5 minutes) Applicant presentation(20 minutes) Board questions and clarifications (5 minutes) Public comments (close public comment portion of hearing) (5 minutes) Applicant rebuttal (5 minutes) - Chairperson identifies the issues to be discussed (5 minutes) HPC discussion(15 minutes) Motion(5 minutes) *Make sure the motion includes what criteria are met or not met. No meeting of the HPC shall be called to order without a quorum consisting 1 at least t four (4) members being present. No meeting at which less than a q uorum shall shall conduct any.business other than to continue the agenda items to a date certain. All actions shall require the concurring vote of a simple majority, but in no event less than three (3) concurring votes of the members of the commission then present and voting. PROJECT MONITORING- Projects in bold are currently under construction. P2 Jay Maytin 435 W.Main-AJCC 204 S.Galena 233 W.Hallam 507 Gillespie 1102 Waters 420 E.Cooper 420 E.Hyman Lift One 400 E.Hyman Nora Berko 332 W.Main 1102 Waters 1006 E.Cooper 602 E.Hyman Sallie Golden 206 Lake 114 Neale 534 E.Hyman 517 E.Hyman(Little Annie's) 212 Lake Hotel Aspen 400 E.Hyman Willis Pember 204 S.Galena Aspen Core 514 E.Hyman 624 W.Francis 407 E.Hyman Patrick Segal 204 S.Galena 623 E.Hopkins 701 N.Third 612 W.Main 624 W.Francis 206 Lake 605 W.Bleeker Holden Marolt derrick 212 Lake John Whipple Aspen Core 208 E.Main 201 E.Hyman 420 E.Cooper 602 E.Hyman Hotel Aspen Jim DeFrancia . 420 E.Cooper 420 E.Hyman 407 E.Hyman M:\city\planning\hpc project monitoringTROJECT MONITORING.doc 9/19/2014 ASPEN HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION P4 MINUTES OF SEPTEMBER 17 2014 Chairperson, Jay Maytin called the meeting to order at 5:00 p.m. Commissioners in attendance were Sallie Golden, Willis Pember, John Whipple, Patrick Sagal, Jim DeFrancia and Nora Berko. Staff present: Debbie Quinn, Assistant City Attorney Amy Simon, Historic Preservation Officer Public comments: Ruth Carver, 708 E. Cooper I am the immediate neighbor to Buckhorn Arms. My front door is next to Johnny McGuires. Jay said this is a worksession and there won't be any public comments but there will be public comments when it comes back as an agenda item. The developer is exploring the properties and how they fit into his plans. Ruth said she doesn't have any huge issues and will come back at another time. Patrick reminded the board that the intent of the historic preservation commission is to ensure the preservation of Aspen's character as an historic mining town and early ski resort and cultural center. The guidelines should be applied as intended when we look at different applications. Sallie said when it talks about historic Aspen it is talking about the 1800 to the 1950's. I think you are saying everything should look like 1880's but there is a lot of architecture in our downtown that is considered historic and the modernist of the 50's that we cannot turn our backs on. Worksession St. Mary's Church— no minutes Worksession Overview of upcoming proposals at 517 E. Hopkins, 300/312 E. Hyman, 411 E. Hyman, 232 E. Main — no minutes 1 P5 ASPEN HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION MINUTES OF SEPTEMBER 17, 2014 Debbie said we would like the representatives to state that they understand for the records the nature of a worksession. It is not a recorded public meeting but just a gathering of sorts that allows you to present your ideas and allows the members of the commission to express their ideas in a way that is totally nonbinding and is not to be relied upon in any way shape or form in any future applications. Charles Cunniffe said he understands and represented both applications. Debbie said we have had applications in the recent past where once the application has come in there have been some objections made to worksessions. Debbie cautioned the board to not form any opinion or express any option tonight that might form the basis of someone challenging impartiality in the future. You should not express that you are tied into this design because there isn't even an application yet. You can express opinions as to how it relates to guidelines but don't be adamant in terms of your feelings about a project. Kathy Strickland, Chief Deputy Clerk 2 Q 410 P6 MEMORANDUM TO: Aspen Historic Preservation Commission FROM: Amy Simon, Historic Preservation Officer RE: 712 W.Francis—Temporary Relocation,PUBLIC HEARING DATE: September 24, 2014 SUMMARY: 712 W. Francis is a , landmarked property containing a Victorian era house with a 2007 addition: The addition has a basement beneath it, but the historic structure does not. The owner would like to excavate under the Victorian, leaving it in place and underpinning to create a new foundation - ,and new living space. This work is ,�_:. considered Temporary Relocation. , Staff recommends approval of the ---- temporary relocation with conditions. APPLICANT: 712 West Francis, LLC,represented by Forum Phi Architects. ADDRESS: 712 W. Francis, the east %2 of Lot P and all of Lot Q, Block 15, City and Townsite of Aspen. PARCEL ID: 2735-124-08-004. ZONING: R-6. RELOCATION The intent of this Chapter is to preserve designated historic properties in their original locations as much of their significance is embodied in their setting and physical relationship to their surroundings as well as their association with events and people with ties to particular site. However, it is recognized that occasionally the relocation of a property may be appropriate as it provides an alternative to demolition or because it only has a limited impact on the attributes that make it significant. 1 P7 The following standards apply for relocating a historic property as per Section 26.415.090.0 of the Municipal Code: C.Standards for the Relocation of Designated Properties Relocation for a building, structure or object will be approved if it is determined that it meets any one of the following standards: ement of a historic district and its relocation 1. It is considered a non-contributing el will not affect the character of the historic district; or 2. It does not contribute to the overall character of the historic district or parcel on which it is located and its relocation will not have an adverse impact on the historic district or property; or 3.The owner has obtained a Certificate of Economic Hardship; or 4. The relocation activity is demonstrated to be an acceptable preservation method given the character and integrity of the building, structure or object and its move will not adversely affect the integrity of the historic district in which it was originally located or diminish the historic, architectural or aesthetic relationships of adjacent designated properties; and Additionally fora roval to relocate all of the follow g criteria must be met: 1. It has been determined that the building, structure or object is capable of withstanding the physical impacts of relocation; and 2.An appropriate receiving site has been identified; and 3. An acceptable plan has been submitted providing for the safe relocation, repair and preservation of the building, structure or object including the provision of the necessary financial security. Staff Response: The existing house will remain where it is during this project. Digging will begin from the front of the house to access the existing crawlspace. The historic house will gradually be underpinned with a new foundation and the full basement excavation will be completed. The new basement will extend out further than the front of the existing porch. The basement will be fully covered with grass to conceal this condition. One new lightwell is proposed on the east side of the Victorian. This lightwell should be covered with a grate if anything,not surrounded by a railing, to minimize visibility.. Although the house will not be lifted and moved during excavation, the standard assurances that the structure will be protected are required. These are listed as conditions of approval. memo from a structural engineer addressing the preservation concerns is included in the HPC application and must be submitted with the building permit. The HPC may: • approve the application, • approve the application with conditions, 2 P8 • disapprove the application, or • continue the application to a date certain to obtain additional information necessary to make a decision to approve or deny. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends HPC approve a temporary on-site relocation with the following conditions: 1. The new lightwell, if protected, shall be covered with a grate. 2. A report from a licensed engineer, architect or. housemover demonstrating that the structure can be moved must be submitted with the building permit application in addition to a bond, letter of credit or cashier's check in the amount of$30,000 to ensure the safe relocation. EXHIBITS: A. Application 3 P9 A RESOLUTION OF THE ASPEN HISTORIC PRESERVATIN FOR HE HISTORICPC) APPROVING A TEMPORARY ON-SITE RELO CATION STRUCTURE ON THE PROPERTY LOCATED AT 7112 D TOWNSI FRANCIS, OF ASPENI/Z OF LOT P AND ALL OF LOT Q,$COLORADOY RESOLUTION#_,,SERIES OF 2014 PARCEL ID: 2735-124-08-004 WHEREAS, the applicant, 712 West Francis, LLC, represented by Forum Phi Architecture, requested temporary on-site relocation approval for the historic structure on the property located at 712 W. Francis, the east '/2 of Lot P and all of Lot Q, Block 15, City and Townsite of Aspen; and WHEREAS, Section 26.415.070 of the Municipal Code building or involving ra shall be erected, constructed, enlarged, altered, repaired, designated historic property or district until plans or sufficient information have been submitted to the Community Development Director and approved in accordance with the procedures established for their review;" and WHEREAS, for temporary relocation, the HPC must review the application, a staff analysis report and the evidence presented at a hearing to determine Section 26.415 090�B.4 and with the the City of Aspen Historic Preservation Design Guidelines p rove, Municipal Code and other applicable L Code in to obtain addrtionalinformation disapprove, approve with conditions or con tinue the application necessary to make a decision to approve or deny; and WHEREAS, Amy Simon, in her staff report to HPC dated September 24, 2014, performed an W royal with conditions; analysis of the application based on the standards and recommended app and WHEREAS, at their regular meeting on September 20 the comments, and found the Commission considered the application, the staff mem o and public proposal consistent with the review standards and granted approval with conditions by a vote of to NOW,THEREFORE,BE IT RESOLVED: on the That HPC hereby approves a temporary on-site relocation for the historic Block 15r City and property located at 712 W. Francis, the east '/2 of Lot P and all of Lot Q, Townsite of Aspen with the following conditions: 1. The new lightwell, if protected, ineerb architect or ho grate. emover demonstrating that the 2. A report from a licensed g structure can be moved must be submitted with the building permit application in 712 W.Francis HPC Resolution#_,Series of 2014 Page 1 of 2 P10 addition to a bond, letter of credit or cashier's check in the amount of$30,000 to ensure the safe relocation. APPROVED BY THE COMMISSION at its regular meeting on the 24th day of September, 2014. Jay Maytin, Chair Approved as to Form: Debbie Quinn, Assistant City Attorney ATTEST: Kathy Strickland, Chief Deputy Clerk 712 W. Francis HPC Resolution# Series of 2014 Page 2 of 2 Pil ATTACHMENT 2 - Historic Preservation Land Use Application PROJECT: Name: 712 W Francis Location: 712 W Francis Street,Aspen, CO 81611 CITY AND TOWNSITE OF ASPEN Block: 15 Lot: E 112 AND: Lot: OF P &Lot Q (Indicate street address,lot&block number or metes and bounds description of property) Parcel ID# (REQUIRED) 273512408004 APPLICANT: Name: 712 W Francis LLC Address: 715 W Main Street, Ste 204,Aspen CO 81611 Ell wilson@forumphil.com #: 970-279-4109 Fax#: E-mail: sn @forumphi.com REPRESENTATIVE: =Address: et, Ste 204,Aspen CO 81611 Fax#: E-mail: swilson @forumphi.com TYPE OF APPLICATION: lease check all that apply): FErtifica ric Designation � Relocation(temporary,on ❑ or off-site) te of No Negative Effect ❑ Demolition(total ificate of Appro priateness demolition) ❑ -Minor Historic Development ❑ Historic Landmark Lot Spli ❑ -Major Historic Development ❑ -Conceptual Historic Development ❑ -Final Historic Development -Substantial Amendment EXISTING CONDITIONS: (description of existin g buildings,uses,previous approvals,etc.) Sin le family historic Victorian with 2007 addition. PROPOSAL: (description of proposed buildings,uses,modifications,etc.) Excavate basement/lower level under historic home at existing crawls ace, connecting to 2007 basement. The Victorian will be left in place and underpinned. Aspen Historic Preservation Land Use Application Requirements,Updated:May 29,2007 P12 FORUM ARCHITECTURE I INTERIORS I PLANNING FORUMPHLCOIA 715 W.k1w St I Ste.104 1 F�.sPen,CO 8!611 P:970.27 9.5157 ":665.770.5585 TO: Chris Bendon, Community Development Director FROM: Forum Phi RE: 712 W Francis Street DATE: June 11,2014 Dear Director, Forum Phi requests your approval of an HPC Land Use Application based on the "temporary relocation" standards for a historic Victorian located at 712 West Francis Street. The subject property is listed on the Aspen Inventory of Historic Landmark Sites and Structures. The single- family residence was previously remodeled with a non-historic addition in 2007. There will be a substantial addition to the historic structure which will cause it to be temporarily shored in place. The structure will be underpinned in sections in order to construct a subgrade basement directly beneath the current crawl space.A report from the structural engineer outlines the shoring methods to be utilized. The completion of the new subgrade foundation area will never have caused the historic structure to move from it's original location, this will conform to the historic preservation design guidelines. The Land Use Application for Relocation as this is the best application for underpinning has been completed per the City of Aspen Community Development Department's Historic Preservation Application Package. Sincerely, Steev Wilson,AIA P13 S K PEIGHTAL ENGINEERS Ltd STRUCTURAL CONSULTANTS MEMORANDUM To: Aspen Building Department c/o Steev Wilson Forum Phi 715 West Main St, suite 204 Aspen, CO 81611 From: Stephen K Peightal,PE Date: June 9, 2014 Re: Single Family Basement Addition 712 West Francis Street Aspen, Colorado My office has he above referenced ced Steev project i1We,will submit professional ur standard letter of services for agreement to provide the following services: 1- Observation of existing structure during demolition phase. 2- Design of temporary shoring and permanent underpinning structure. 3- Design and Documents for any additional permanent structural items. 4- Observation during new structural construction with Field Reports. I have reviewed Architectural and Structural remodel documents prepared by others for 2007 work. These documents help to define existing construction. I have had followup discussions with Steev Wilson, to define the intent to provide basement space at the current crawlspace below the main floor plan. Conceptually this project involves opening the foundation at the street side for access into the crawlspace, and shoring existing framing systems. Excavation and staging of underpinning around the foundation perimeter is to be approached from the interior excavated space. Conclusion My office has begun the design construction approach to thus phasejof workd attached Concept sheets to defin e our Please contact my office with any questions. 14033 SKPE . 298 Park Avenue • #301 a Basalt, CO • 81621 e (970) 927-9510 • skpe @sopris.net P14 EXI5TIN6 FLOOR FRAMING TO REMAIN s , -�-�-��' EXCAVATE TO WORKING PLATFORM. ' I I i SLOPE UP TO EXISTING FOOTING IV TO 2H —,: AS REQUIRED f B. (E) FOOTING EXISTIN VV.I.F.G FOUNDATION OFCEXV5T N6 FOO N6. 1I- Q w wo OO in -1III O I---- z B. UNDERPINNING III SEE PLAN STEP I: EXCAVATE TO WORKING PLATFORM. EXCAVATE APPROXIMATELY 4 TO 6 FEET WIDTH TRENCHE5 A5 SECTION (�) ON PLAN. LEAVE UNDISTURBED 501L SECTIONS 4 TO 6 FEET WIDTH BETWEEN FOR WALL SUPPORT. SHORE TRENCH PER GOVERNING REOUIREMENT5 TO PREVENT COLLAPSE. �INDP I NN NG 5EP 2 0� 14033 ISSUED: S K PEIGHTAL ENGINEERS]Ltd GONGEPT SHEET: Oq JUN. '14 STRUCTURAL CONSULTANBASEMENT ADDITION DRAWN: 298 Park Avenue Unit 301 KNL Basalt,Colorado 81621 712 N. MAIN STREET OF: (970) 927-9510 skpe(Zsopris. ASPEN, COLORADO 6 P15 ......_.. .._....: #5 VERTICAL @ S O.G. DRILL AND EPDXY 3" =rrr J INTO BOTTOM EXI5TING FOOTING.DRIVE 16" I_I< INTO 501L BOTTOM FOR LAP N FINAL. 4 J B. (E) FOOTING V.I.F. VERIFY 12" OR GREATER —III=1 I I=I—'- EQ EQ a • a it FIE II #5 HORIZONTAL® S" O.G. DRIVE I6" INTO 501L 51DE5 FOR LAP WITH FINAL STEP 2: PLACE REINFORGIN6. FORM INTERIOR FACE IN LINE WITH FACE OF EXISTING WALL ABOVE. POUR SECTION TIGHT TO 501L AND FILLING IN FOOTING 5EGTION. U5E MEGHANIGAL VIBRATION FOR PROPER GON50LIDATION. HOLD POUR 3" TO 6" BELOW BOTTOM OF EXI5TING FOOTING. GONGRETE DE5I6NED FOR 3000 P51 COMPRE551VE STRENGTH. U5E 4000 P51 MIX TO HA5TEN GURING. UNDERP I NN I NG - STEP 2 e 1/2��-11-011 14033 7DRAWN: S K PEIGHTAL ENGINEERS Ltd F T(fE SHEET: STRUCTURAL CONSULTANTS T ADITION GI.2 298 Park Avenue Unit 301 IN �c, TREET OF: Basalt,Colorado 81621 ASPEN, �DO 6 (970) 927-9510 skpe ��)sopris.net -P16 —T--- Tr d .tee: B. (E) FOOTING V.I.F. d d _ p _I��IiI���III�III d d a it VIII b". STEP 3: AFTER 3 DAY CURE AT ABOVE FREEZING TEMPERATURES,REMOVE FORM AND PACK NON-5HRINK GROUT FULL AREA BETWEEN EXI5TING FOOTING AND UNDERPINNING. AFTER GROUT CURED,EXCAVATE 501L BETWEEN UNDERPINNING A5 5EGTI0N ® ON PLAN. REPEAT 5TEP5 1,2, $3. G UNDERPINNING - 5MP 5 14033 fSSUED: S K PEIGHTAL ENGINEERS Ltd CONCEPT SHEET: 01 JUN. '14 STRUCTURAL CONSULTANTS BASEMENT ADDITION DRAWN: 298 Park Avenue Unit 301 KNL Basalt, Colorado 81621 112 W. MAIN STREET OF: (970) 927-9510 skpe(-+)sopris.net ASPEN, COLORADO 6 P17 d B. (E) FOOTING \/.I.F. 4 Q , • a O d Q a a NEW PLATFORM —II�IIIIIII I'' III O O In F W O ru X ti l 13.UNDERPINNING =111-1 11 SEE PLAN STEP 4: EXCAVATE TO NEW WORKING PLATFORM. EXCAVATE PITS 5EGTION AO AND REPEAT 5TEP5 I, 2, 4 5 WITH TOE PROFILE (STEP -5) FOR NEXT LEVEL DOWN. UND�RP 1 NN I NG - 5TEP 4 14033 SHEET: ISSUED: S K PEIGHTAL ENGINEERS Ltd CONCEPT Oq JUN. '14 STRUCTURAL CONSULTANTS BASEMENT ADDITION DRAWN: 298 Park Avenue Unit 301 112 K MAIN STREET OF: KNL Basalt, Colorado 81621 (� ASPEN (970) 927-951.0 skpe(d)sopris.net , COLORADO P18 �e B. (E) FOOTING ° V.LF. d d O d c VERIFY 12" ° OR GREATER ° NEW PLATFORM #5 HORIZONTAL ® 8" O.G. DRIVE 16' INTO 501L 51DE5 —I • FOR LAP WITH FINAL EQ EQ o ow a z u w _ B. UNDERPINNING SEE PLAN u #5 HORIZONTAL @ S" O.G. DRIVE 16" INTO 501L 51DE5 FOR LAP WITH FINAL #5 DOWEL x 15'L ® 8" O.G. 15•• STEP 5; PLACE REINFORCING. FORM INTERIOR FACE IN LINE WITH FACE OF EXI5TIN6 WALL ABOVE. POUR 5EGTION TIGHT TO 501L AND FILLING IN FOOTING 5EGTION. U5E MECHANICAL VIBRATION FOR PROPER GON50LIDATION. POUR TIGHT TO BOTTOM OF UPPER WALL. UND 7 I NN I NG - STEP 5 ® I/2 -I-0 14033 ISSUED: S K PEIGHTAL ENGINEERS Ltd GONGEPT SHEET: 01 JUN. '14 STRUCTURAL CONSULTANTS BASEMENT ADDITION. DRAWN: 298 Park Avenue Unit 301 G15 KNL Basalt,Colorado 81621 °112 W. MAIN STREET p p ASPEN, COLORADO OF: (0 (970) 927-9510 sk e ris.net<vso P19 KERF-5AW AND REMOVE FOOTING LIP TO FACE OF WALL B.(E) FOOTING 4 . e a a 4 ° a ° a PLACE SLAB TIGHT 0 TO BOND BREAKER 4" CONCRETE 5LA13 PER PLAN. 5EE o a ARCH.FOR VAPOR BARRIER,ETC. a T.SLAB X`--X_=X=-X� -X"°-'X-` `4'X 5EE PLAN =III 11—I I—I 11—I —III=1 I 1—I 11- B.UNDERPINNING — � I El I� �1 l 1�1 i 1 I I-_ SEE PLAN STEP 6: EXCAVATE BALANCE OF INTERIOR 501L. REPEAT 5TEP5 2 THRU 5 FOR 5EGTION® ON PLAN. 5AW-GUT AND REMOVE FOOTING LIP. 5AW-GUT CONCRETE WALL INHERE INDICATED ON PLAN. PLACE LOWER FLOOR SLAB PER PLAN. UNDERPINNING - 5TEF 6 I/2"=1'-0" 14033 ISSUED: FKPEIGIHI TAL ENGINEERS Ltd CONCE PT SHEET: 01 JUN. '14 RAL CONSULTANTS 5ASEMENT ADDITION DRAWN: k Avenue Unit 301 •rI2 yy. MP�IN STREET OF: KNL , Colorado P81C21 P ASPEN, COLORADO 6 (970) 927-951.0 sk e a)so ris.net J 0 N a ]15 Wnnl Mn4r dlmet BWro 7pe CeOretle 41611 r.vy6.nv.ns r.eau.rosses 712 W FRANCIS 712 W FRANCIS,LLC 713 W Renck SI Aspen,CO 87811 '4t OF CO6pT CONSULTANTS SURVEYOR ney xteSUebne Saee�e Aaron,Wbtaee Melt IBxOl exe:916 arorovrewL.¢uv®nv6m CIVIL MECHANICAL STRUCTURAL cow�.m e i e.rcmuw I col o+l.vsly annmew ww"� deuuN� COIITRACTOR I �%; � �," m QMi6 HFC UUB USEAPP FR6ACTNO: M. ORAVMW BAH ;� /% � COR'gIC11T 1-0RIIM FM,LLt SHEETTITLE wAU OETAe _ A-501 ra. wau oErnit DETAILS P21 �. . RECEIVED 715 West Main Street,Suite 204 /Q 1 Aspen,Colorado 81611 JUL O 20.4 970.279.4157 F 866 770 5585 CITY OF ASPEN COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT 712 W FRANCIS 712 W FRANCIS,LLC 715 W Francis St Aspen,CO 81611 P�OF CO4O'P'Q STEVEN b * WILSON 402127 ti O ARO�\q�U CONSULTANTS \E SURVEYOR Aspen Survey Engineers 210 S Galena Street Aspen.Colorado 81817 % (970)925-3818 aspensu rveyorstAg ma il.com -LEI CIVIL t j TBD • � MECHANICAL TED 1 1s 0 STRUCTURAL S K Peghtal Engineers 6, R-9 204 Park Avenue o Basalt,Colorado 81621 1621 (970)927-9510 wz, skpe(gsophs.net a CONTRACTOR xo, s TED J ii19!7014 DATE OF%)BUCATION I N��'s sr PROJECT SITE >+�.�,�.•ams cm...,.c�p rm SD 9/8/14 HPCLANDUSEAPP PROJECT NO: 1410 DRAWN BY: BAH COPYRIGHT FORUM PHI,LLC 712 W FRANCIS 715 W Francis Street, Aspen, Colorado, 81611, USA HPC LAND USE APPLICATION SHEET TITLE FOR TEMPORARY RELOCATION C Vp COVER LEGEND AND NOTES O FOUND SURVEY MONUMENT AS DESCRIBED B CITY MONUMENT 0' POSTED ADDRESS: 12 A SURVEY CONTROL p 0 0 TITLE INFORMATION FURNISHED BY U.S. SURVEY FOOT P T K I N COUNTY IL E. CASE N0. PC21, 20W DATED: MAY 21. 2014 A p ❑ UTILILTIES WATER VALVE C• !P��ED 1m ®�� 1959 OFFICIAL MAP OF THE CITY OF ASPEN WAS USED FOR THE PREPARATION OF OF THIS PLAT. CALLS IN 1 I ARE FROM THIS PLAT. / 3y SHED IS,5009 /I E / o CONC 95.00.1 DRIVE / 2594) / / o i / / v / / w 2< /LL ASE) JOB NO 21038 HOUSE / / 2 / z F ASE 2 JOB N0. 21193A W /pORCN u ® / o W / W WEST 1,1 / EASr 16129 / INEENCE AICAVG '5009". 1l W PRCRERT CERTFICAION 45. r LINE THE UNDERSIGNED STATES THAT THE PROPERTY DESCRIBED HEREON WAS FIELD SURVEYED DURING 2014 AND IS ACCURATE 16129 BASED ON THE FIELD EVIDENCE AS SHOWN AND THAT THERE ARE NO DISCREPANCIES OF RECORD BOUNDARY LINE CONFLICTS ENCROACHMENTS. EASEMEN T5 OR RIGHTS OF WAY IN FIELD EVIDENCE OR KNOWN TO ME EXCEPT AS HEREON SHOWN. UNDERGROUND UTILITIES WITH NO ABOVEGROUND APPURTENANCES. AND DOCUMENTS OF RECORD NOT SUPPLIED TO THE IN 7SOO9 SURVEYOR SEAL EXCEPTED.SURVEYOR RUBELOWIS VOID UNLESS WET STAMPED ITH THE GRAVEL PARKING W 60.DO./ DATED: EDGE pF PAVEMENT JOHN M. HOWORTH P.L.5. 25947 \ m HORIZONTAL \ CONTROL \ �c p N 1SOD9 I W \ 169 9/ \ AS /S \_ OF BEARINGS IMPROVEMENT SURVEY \ OF `® THE EAST 112 OF LOT P. ALL OF LOT 0. BLOCK IS CITY AND TOWNSITE OF ASPEN AREA 4.500 S.F.-/- PREPARED BY ASPEN SURVEY ENGINEERS, INC. 210 SOUTH GALENA STREET "I` A111%INH i0 DLDPADD LAW 111 M ST<DHHEI E EGAL EA AFTE FNYDU E�5 IANVVE AFS C DD"ECT PEN 0 E—T H1YEANYAAC PHONE/FAX COLORADO 01 925!11116 BASED U TDEFECI IN HIS BE NCED E i N TEN ACTION YEARS G THE THN CERETGSTAllC.S N HEREE�NTHE ON ISA_ IG NOT WITH THE L OF THE DATE JOB 6/14 252208 ALLEY —__—__—_____—__-------___1 715 West Main Street,Suite 204 Aspen,Colorado CONCRETE DRIVE j I I P:9702794157 F:866.70.5585 I I — — — — — II L--4 I I 712 W FRANCIS I I 712 W FRANCIS,LLC II j__J I 715 W Francis St I I Aspen,CO 81611 I II j I I I OF C04D'P I I I P II j I STEVEN �O I I * WILSON Ij I I 402127 ti G't'\,`�V FD AR I I I I I I CONSULTANTS I SURVEYOR I I 1 Aspen Survey Engineers j i I 210 S Galena Street I Aspen,Colorado 81611 I I (970)925-3816 I I I I aspensurveyors @gmail.com I I I CIVIL TED I I I I � I I I I I � I I EGRE SPROPOSED ounlNE Or ExISnNG I EcRESg uGRTWELL MECHANICAL --�BUILDING FOOTPRINT I I TED I � i --------- I I _—_____ I STRUCTURAL S K Peightal Engineers 204 Park Avenue A#1C Basa i I I I (970)h927-9510 0 81621 skpe(Msopris.net I I OUTLINE OF PROPOSED I I BUILDING FOOTPRINT CONTRACTOR i I I LINE OF SETBACK TBD I I 3 I i w v 662014 DATE OF PUBLICATION o I O PROPERTY LINE GRAVEL PARKING _ SD 6LHPC USE APP PROJECTNO: 1410_ _ DRAWN BY: BAH COPYRIGHT FORUM PHI,LLC W FRANCIS STREET SHEET TITLE SITE PLAN 1/6" 1•-0" A-001 I PROPOSED SITE 1 4 8 16 PLAN ALLEY ---------------- 715 West Mein Street.Suite 204 CONCRETE DRIVE l I CONCRETE DRIVE Aspen.COIOraU081611 P 970.279.4157 F 866 770 5585 _I— _ _ _I I II 712 W FRANCIS 712 W FRANCIS,LLC 715 W Francis St Aspen,,CO 81611 I I I I I I i II L-------- DF c0 I � D I q� I STEVEN II I I I II I * WILSON 40x127 ti I I CONSULTANTS SURVEYOR Aspen Survey Engineers 1 I 210 S Galena Street I Aspen,Colorado 81611 1 I I I (970)925-3816 aspensumyom@gmail.com I I I I I I I I I I CIVIL BDD LINE Ofi PROPOSEC I I LINEO PROPOSED OUTLINE OF EXISTING I EGRES{LiGRiWF.LI OUTLINE OF EXISTING EGRE LiGI+iwELt MECHANICAL .Z BUL.ING FOOTPRINT I I I BUILDING FOOTPRINT TBD I I I I I I I I I I 1 I I I 1 `----------1 I STRUCTURAL S K Peightal Engineers 204 Park Avenue A#1C Basak,Colorado 81621 1 I (970)927-9510 OUTLINE OF PROPOSED I I OUTLINE OF PROPOSED I skpe�sopris.net BUILDING FOOTPRINT I BUILDING FOOTPRINT CONTRACTOR i I TED LINE OF SETBACK I I LINEOFSETBACK I 3 3 O 6162014 DATE OF PU JCIa`1ON O O PROPERTY LINE PROPERTY LINE GRAVEL PARKING GRAVEL PARKING SD I BIB/14 JHPCLANDUSEAPP PROJECT NO'. 1410 DRAWN BY: BAH COPYRIGHT FORUM PHI,LLC W FRANCIS STREET W FRANCIS STREET SHEET TITLE w PROPOSED LANDSCAPE PLAN 118" = V-0 L-00" EXISTING LANDSCAPE PLAN 1/8" = 1'-0" 1 N LANDSCAPE PLAN 1 4 B 6 ' I __--__-__2 3 4 I _ _____________ —1 _______________________ I I I I � I I I I I BATH I I I I I I I FO-02-1 I I I i I I i I s I I 715 West Main Street,Suite 204 Aspen,Colorado 81611 I I I P:970.279.4157 F:866.770.5585 BEDROOM j_ I 001_j I I CLOSET 712 W FRANCIS NEW' WALL I I I I I I I 712 W FRANCIS,LL C BELOW DININ G IYVIUL (SEE MUCK)) 715 W Francis St I I I i Aspen,CO 81611 STAIR D W I I I I _ OF OD o I i I I I I I APq�4 4O LAUNDRY 000 STORAGE ' I EXISTING CONC I * WILSON$STEVEN FOUNDATION WALL I I I I fA `.,t a ♦ I I I I 402127 ti •' I I I CL �V CRAWL II j I I I SPACE I 11 j CONSULTANTS SURVEYOR Aspen Survey Engineers 210 S Galena Street I I I Aspen,Colorado 81611 I (970)925-3816 iaspensurveyors@gmail.com I, PROPOSEOCONC I I I CIVIL FOUNDATION WALL I RE STRUCTURAL I TBD I I I I I MECHANICAL I i MEDIA I I Teo CRAW SPA EL I o01 I j STRUCTURAL I I S K Peightal Engineers I 204 Park Avenue A#1 C I Basak,Colorado 81621 I I (970)%27-9510 1 skpe @sopds.net II I CONTRACTOR I I reD 6'62011 DATE OF PUBLICATION I' I II I i I PROPOSED rLIGHTWELL PER 26 575 020 E 9 1. II PWDR CLOSE 11 002 jl � I II I I I I I 1 SD 8!0/14 HPC LAND USE APP �I BEDROOM oro I I PROJECT NO: 1410 11 _ I - _i- ------_---- i I DRAWN BY: BAH I I ' BATH `E`EE01 MAR i i COPYRIGHT FORUM PHI,LLC II i I 11 I I �J I SHEET TITLE ( I I I I ' I I I A-101 LINE OF SETBACK I ' L______________________________________ ____-_____-I N EXISTING LOWER LEVEL-FOR REFERENCE 1/4" = 1'-0" PROPOSED LOWER LEVEL 1/4" = V-0 (1) FLOOR PLANS 1 4 8 16 � I � I I , I , EXISTING ADU PARKING BATH CLOSET i 715 West Main Street,Suite 204 GARAGE �" .xrExac,,,l,.x.,. I Aspen,Colorado 81611 P:970.279.4157 F:868.770.5585 ADU z 206 0 KITCHEN '� l 712 W FRANCIS NEWDMINGC 712 W FRANCIS,LLC 1W 6 715 W Francis St WOOD > H — —— Aspen,CO 81611 "°' xc 1 woo i• I 1 2. 6 J 1 8 x NEW DECK .xwx ouN.«: T`NR"'TOn a c Ti r TA02HALL OF CO<O�j 1 ® WOOD L 107 S�,R. To•- F E :$ G yA q� 1 woo D STEVEN I 18 e71. mF 1 .xa,TT,11Bw... 1 uP 1 * WILSON / 402127 -3w.— ABU xBwnc - x.Aw raxo-a SFD ApG vzo 1 MxwKO.v...n ... PANTRY .ew .HOw 1 wt+nso.^��tii F V/O�O i DEMO.1M..NTCHEN�� wa�aElx°sTrLilN�s CONSULTANTS TO xMWMRT °� NEW KITCHEN SURVEYOR ----------- ---' g Aspen Survey Engineers &j SIDE ENTRY I 210 S Galena Street OFFICE PORCH — — — — — — —— — — — Aspen,Colorado 81811 ® wioiwn°-wDAxw w I (970)925-3816 MABTER BATH aspensurveyorsftmail.com r-______ x L______ `� 6E�srvuiru�^Mls) Darin x FAMILY CIVIL 1 ______ KITCHEN 104 REMOVE IXISTING L______ ("^� (^) t I 10a ff WOOD STAIR'NEW PLOOR T� WOOD FRAMING PER SMUCTURALS -- IBBwR L------ EXISTING FIREBOX TO REMAIN MECHANICAL '------- 1 —Z• TED MA8TER CLOSET %a,m i• 1• — — —— — — —— ——I— — F F2-0-21 -- ro _ STRUCTURAL i S K Peightal Engineers ARd10Pp 204 Park Avenue A#1 C eaxo-a. Basalt,Colorado 81621 ] (970)927-9510 skpe@sopns.net PWDR Tn, CONTRACTOR 102 4 TBD MASTER B1 EDROOM TLE 20 VP IF ENTRY HALL 4, 101 692014 DATE OF PUBUUTION TILE PARLOR ... F1031 ., N WOOD 3 3 EXISTING FIREPLACE APPLIANCE TO REMAIN FRONT PORCH SD 8/8114 HPC LAND USEAPP i (COVERED) _ — — — — PROJECT NO: 1410 DRAWN BY: BAH COPYRIGHT FORUM PHI,LLC SHEET TITLE N A-102 EXISTING UPPER LEVEL-FOR REFERENCE 1/4" = V-0" EXISTING MAIN LEVEL-FOR REFERENCE 1/4" = 1'-O" FLOOR PLANS 1 4 8 6 715 West Main Street,Suite 204 Aspen,Colorado 81611 P:970.279.4157 F:888.770.5585 712 W FRANCIS 712 W FRANCIS,LLC 715 W Francis St Aspen,CO 81611 �Q,OF CO<O AP y STEVEN * WILSON 40212 A u a c��SFD AF�a 4, CONSULTANTS SURVEYOR Aspen Survey Engineers 210 S Galena Street Aspen,Colorado 81611 (970)925.3816 aspensurveyors(Mgmall.00m CIVIL TBD C MECHANICAL TBD STRUCTURAL S K Peightal Engineers 204 Park Avenue A#1 C Basalt,Colorado 81821 (970)%27-9510 skpe @sopris.net CONTRACTOR TBD T.0 PLY Q UPPER LEVEL T.O.PLY O UPPER LEVEL GWO14 DATE OF PUBLICATJON EXISTING FRONT PORCH GRA E OV OS ER PROPED LOW R LEVEL TO --------T.O.FlYQMA1N LEVEL'— ----7= T.O.RY —IN LEVEL LNE OF EXISTING GRADE _____________________ TO RE"N _—__ __—_------- ------ SO W&14 HPCLANDUSEAPP PROJECT NO: 1410 PROPOSEDCONC FOUNDATgN WALL DRAWN BY: BAH COPYRIGHT FORUM PHI,LLC PROPOSED con C SLAB C-C SLAB RE STRUCTURAL �CCrvC T.O.SLAB LOWER LEVEL i O.aIAB LOWER LEVEL SHEET TITLE A-301 H SECTION 1/41 = 1'-0" SECTIONS 1 4 8 6 715 West Main Street,Suite 204 Aspen,Colorado 81611 P 970,2794157F 866.770.5585 712 W FRANCIS 712 W FRANCIS,LLC 715 W Francis St Aspen,CO 61611 qE of C040 �P STEVEN * WILSON 402127 i c��'QED ARCS\ Zoning Allowance&Project Summary 712 W Francis CONSULTANTS - SURVEYOR Development Single Family I Remodel/Addr— spit y Engineers 210 S Galena Street Parcel a 273512408004 Aspen,Colorado 81611 (970)925-3816 District R-6 aspensurveyorsCgn1ad.COm CIVIL mac TBD Front loft 26.710.040.0.1. Rear tOR 61tfix an 28.710.040.0.3 Side 5 R .710.040.DA Combined Side R 25.710.040.DA MECHANICAL Distance between Buildings 5 R 26.710.040.D.9 TBD Comer Lot MIA 28.710.040 O n ace% No keman: 29.710.040.13.10 Sit.cow a NoUnnitation 26.710.040.D.7 STRUCTURAL On-Site Parkin 28.710.040 S K Peghtel Engineers _ 204 Park Avenue A#1 C h ofShecownge Basalt Colorado 81621 Gross Lot Area(sq ft) _14,600 600 Survey_ (970)927-9510 Area of Building Footprint(sq ft) 1,800 1,800 'Survey_ skpe@sopds.net Site coverage% 00% CONTRACTOR nrnMabls TBD !Received TDR Certificate WA :Sent TDR Certificate WA Transferred TDR CeAi icate IWA &e 014 DATE OF PUBLICATION Land 0,170 PMkin Courtly Assessor 1 roverrreMa 1258,000 111101 ti Cou Aeaessor Total _ 3,432,800 P81dn County Assessor Allowable Floor Area 712 W Francis Street SO W&14 HPC LAND USE APP Par R-8,2,400 square Teet of floor area,plus 28 square feet of PROJECT NO: 1410 Boor area for each atltli ona11"square feet in Net Lot Area, DRAWN BY: BAH up to a maximum of 3,24.square feet of floor area 2,120 it -- - - -- - COPYRIGHT FORUM PHI,LLC Fkst 250 sq it exempt Gange Exemption Next 251-500 sq It to exclude 50%of area _ _ ,675.020.D.7 Front porch on street-facing facade exempt .757.020.D.5 Deck Exe bn 23 s fl exempt(Allowable Floor Area 2,280 sq R x 15% .675.020.0.4 sad F _ Lover 1" 7.00 121.89 11.95100 59.95 _2-002 Garage(located W Mein Level) 14.46 82.23 k114.46 82.23 Z-0o3 - Main1" 1,314.00 1,339.00 1,314.00 1,339_.00 'iZ-003 Deck Am 35425 0.00 354.26 D.DO Z-003 SHEET TITLE U rLmM 1,318.76 1,310.75 1,310 75 1,310.752-003 _ Z-001 ZONING SUMMARY � 6c0 s9tt f` 715 West Main Street,Suite 204 332.50 s9R 7;50 sqh 10625 sgtt 19650 sgfl Aspen,Colorado 87811 P.970.279.4157 F:888.770.5585 2. $_ 712 W FRANCIS 712 W FRANCIS,LLC 715 W Francis St 0 219.25s ft 27600spR Aspen,CO 81611 s r, DF CO< EXISTING LOWER LEVEL SUBGRADE WALLS 1 ra, = 1'-0" STEVEN * WILSON 402127 A �u OF,�s�D ARO�` -------------- -- -- ---------------- �_-3--�----------'I I I i-L—>-------a --------------- ----- Floor Area Calculations ---------- I I CONSULTANTS 712W SURVEYOR ___________ ______ __________ _________ Aspen Survey Engine ers I 210 s Galena street EXIMin ---1 .t✓lWall Area `.-. Ft? I I lJ I Aspen,Colorado 81611 I I I (970)925-3618 aspensurveyom@gmeil.com _ 1 332.50 2 77.50 I I I I CIVIL TBD 3 100.25 ,_ 4 108.60 38.00 I . ff I 6 218.25 I II-I I I 414.48 sqR ; _ -I._'-••x` J'' I I 6 276.00 69700.11 I Overall Total Wall Arm Ft) 1.210.00 I •RrXeN I I -I MECHANICAL TBD Exposed Wall Areal Ft) 38.00 I I 96 or sod wan(Exposed/Total 3.196 I jy- .. I I I Lower Level Gross Floor Area( M.00 216.50 sq h -_..- S K Peightal Engine ers 1,310 STRUCTURAL F 204 Park Avenue A#1C 75eg Main LevN Grey Flow An 0 Basan,Colorado 81621 Osre Grose Fbor Floor Arq(A 14"F t(8 Ft 4 .48 I I I PI I[ 'I 'I I I I z I (970) 2 7-9510 8 skpe�sopns.ne t $12J 414A6-260-17218/4 From Porch Gross Floor Area F) 8375 Exempt per 28.575.020.D5 CONTRACTOR Exempt per 20.575.020.D.6 TBD Mein Level Deck Gross Floor Area(Sq Ft) 24.00 Allowetas=423 sq R Deck/POreh Countable Floor Area(Sq Ft) DAD I �I I I it 1,338.00 w ft _ in Level Countable Floor Am(Sq Ft) II euinrec orr I i , I I \ I Exktlng U r U I L I I I I I I I I r✓erzou DATE of RueuclnoN U Laval GFeas Floor Am 1.310.76 I II I I II I I I CR PAGE Exempt per 26.675.020.D.8 Deck Oroas Fbor Area Ft 244.50 Allowable=423 aq R DecklPorch Courdabb Fbor Am Pq PO DAD .Upper Leval Count � l I I � Floor Area Lower Level Floor Area(Sq Ft) Main Level Floor Area(Sq Ft) Floor Area(Ft) - 7 . I�I l I I I I I SD 6014 HPC IAND USE APP Upper Leve l Floor Area(Sq Ft) 1 .75 Total Existing Floor Area(Sq Ft) PROJECT NO: 1410 DRAWN BY: BAH I I'o— JIB --}I�--------------�-0 COPYRIGHT FORUM PHI,LLC NEYy NDF PLAN l2J a 4 I I 1E1N'ST F.L.L V b b I Z 3 4 I I , L__-----____LINEOF 9ETB4GK__—_-----J I ! L___________UNE OFeET!nK--______—_J I I L_--________t E OF SETBA-______ I ___ , I I I I I I I I I I I ' I I 1 I I I L----------- PROPERTYLINE----------_ I I------- PROPERTY LINE I I---- PROPERTY LINE SHEET TITLE EXISTING UPPER LEVEL FLOOR AREA 118" = V-0" EXISTING MAIN LEVEL FLOOR AREA 1RP - 1'-0" EXISTING LOWER LEVEL FLOOR AREA 1/8" = 1'-0" Z-002 IN FLOOR AREA 4 8 6 CALCULATIONS gyp• *- 1.� -9 16-0 — f 1_e."9•• k 2o.ve'. - --f F T- b 25 aq 77 50 sq N 106 25 sq fl 198 50 s9 k 219.25 aq R �� e _ 26 1 276 00 sq ft 516 75 R 715 West Main Street.Suite 204 Aspen,Colorado 81611 P:970.279 4157 F.866 770 5585 s. 7 T 244r �c �� »- 712 W FRANCIS 0S1v' 712 W FRANCIS,LLC 264.00sgn s16.7s�gN 715 W Francis St Aspen,CO 81611 a OF CO< PROPOSED LOWER LEVEL SUBGRADE WALLS 1/8 = 1'-0" h STEVEN * WILSON 402127 ti V Floor Area Calculations ---------------- ----------- ---------------�--- - r— ------- —--—--—--—, CONSULTANTS 712W F7andf 1 z a a I I 1 z s 'I + 1 s 3 SURVEYOR -____________ - ------ I Aspen Survey Engineers -—-— 210 S Galena Street Proposed Lower Lwel Exposed Wom Caloule8ons _ I I 4 I I I I _ I I I I Aspen,Colorado 81611 �'I I I (970)925-3816 Lower Lay6llp(1.g,ll,pel Total_W - Well ; aspensurveYors@gmail.com 1 7436 I I CIVIL z 776D I I I _i L-------- -- J I �I I 1 TBD 3 108.25 � a I 4 198.50 38.00 6 219.25 6 278.00 7 616.76 e 3 I ,I i I i MECHANICAL 264.00 TBD S 518.75 30.60 - I @9 F , �Overall TOW Wall Ana 2836 2 1 Fxpoaed Wall Area Ft) 68.60 1 246`!0 sq R I r�x. I :.J TETFTE I i I %o1E d W811 Sq Ft1(Exposed/Total) 3.07% -—-—- —-— —Q '�� JII ., i 1-0 STRUCTURAL _Lw e_r_Le.v..el Oros_s Floor Area(Sq Ft) 1.951,00 1,961J70 � I I I K: I S K Pe htal E Sq Ft) 1.310 75 sq It 204 Pk Avenn A mee rs C Low Level Countable Floor Area Basalt,Coloraduo e 81621 i i posed Main Level Flow AAna a _ply,. •,.� I ' i i i ' skpe�sopns�net Main Level Grose Floor Am F 1,339.00 _- 1,951.00 aq6 I 7BD TRACTOR Garage GmsFborAns R 414.411 <.. r- II X44 I'"° :£ ' I I liar Floor Ana Ft 62.23 414A6-260-172.26/2 I I' �� j ' I I 1,339.00 sgft I From Porch Gross Floor Ana(Sq Ft)_-- 83.75 par 28.576.020.D.6 r II f.. I II .. i I ''I I I Fxsmpt per 28.576.020.D.8 U r Level Deok Gross Floor Area 6 Ft 24.00 Allowable=423 sq R e1 DATE of PUL1DG7fON FIN DeokNOroh CoumabN Floor Ana Ft ODB I 1! I *I"11 I xx � I _ I I I I i L Upper Leval Oross Floor Arta 1„710.76 I II I I I I 11 I 1 I I II Exempt per 26.675.020.D.8 Upper Level Deck Groes Floor Area(Sq Ft 248.50 Albvrobk=423 s Dec WPOrch Countable Floor Area(Sq Ft OAO I II I I ( I I 1O1is -•ri-. I -I I II taper Level Countable Fkwr Ares - ' I i i I li ' I I b I II I II I II V Lower Level Floor Area Ft 59.86 ' i + I SD W8/14 HPC LAND USE APP Total P I II '- I I Me.Level Roor Area( Ft) 1,421.23 II I I , II L I I PROJECT NO: 1410 DeddPomh Floor Am Ft 0.00 DRAWN BY: BAH U,per Level Floor Arta FQ 1,310.76 I II I 1 I I I I II I I I I I I '�P ---------2 V—-—-— -, —'O I i J3I 1 1 I COPYRIGHT FORUM PHI,LLC NNJ ZND F LAN 11 o-F-L V — I I I I I I I I I I IJNE OF SLTBAOK I UNEOF 8ETMOK __----J 1 L-__----_--_liNE Or SEi6ncn--___----� r r , 1 --—- -—PROPERTY LINE—- I I PROPERTY LINE I I PROPERTY LINE ---- ---------- L-------------------------'--- I------------------------------ SHEET TITLE PROPOSED UPPER LEVEL FLOOR AREA 1/8" = V-0" PROPOSED MAIN LEVEL FLOOR AREA 1/8" = 1'-0' PROPOSED LOUVER LEVEL FLOOR AREA 1/8" = V-0" Z-003 ® FLOOR AREA 4 6 e CALCULATIONS Q P22 s MEMORANDUM TO: Aspen Historic Preservation Commission FROM: Amy Simon,Historic Preservation Officer RE: 101 E. Hallam- Minor Development and Temporary On-site Relocation, Public Hearing DATE: September 24, 2014 SUMMARY: 101 E. Hallam is listed on the Aspen Inventory of Historic Landmark Sites and Structures. The site contains a Victorian era house and shed. Both buildings are constructed of brick, which is a small subset of the 19th century residential structures remaining in Aspen. The applicant is requesting Minor Development review to expand an existing non-historic addition to the house and to excavate a new basement. Setback variances are requested to legalize existing and proposed new conditions. The amount of new square footage involved in the project qualifies this as Minor Development, The Victorian house will not be lifted to construct the new basement; rather it will be left in place and underpinned. Nonetheless,this work is reviewed as Temporary Relocation. Staff recommends the project be continued for restudy, finding that the proposal does not meet the design guidelines and decision-making criteria. As will be explained below, the house has been significantly altered in the past. The proposed new work further erodes the integrity of the historic resource. APPLICANT: Hallam LLC, represented by Forum Phi Architecture, with consent of the current property owner, Patricia Gorman. PARCEL ID: 2735-124-37-001. ADDRESS: 101 E. Hallam, Lot A and the west 4.86' of Lot B, Block 65, City and Townsite of Aspen, Colorado. ZONING: R-6 MINOR DEVELOPMENT The procedure for a Minor Development Review is as follows Staff reviews the submittal materials and prepares a report that analyzes the project's conformance with the design guidelines and other applicable Land Use Code Sections This report is transmitted to the HPC with relevant information on the proposed project and a recommendation to continue, approve, disapprove or approve with conditions and the reasons for the recommendation. The HPC will review the application, the staff analysis report and the evidence presented at the hearing to determine the project's conformance with the City of Aspen Historic Preservation 1 _ f I P23 Design Guidelines. The HPC may approve, disapprove, approve with conditions, or continue the application to obtain additional information necessary to make a decision Appropriateness to approve or deny. If the application is approved, the HPC shall issue a Certificate o ro riateness and the Community Development Director shall issue a Development Order. Tlie HPC decision shall be final unless appealed by the applicant or a landowner within three hundred (3 00)feet of the subject property in accordance with the procedures set forth in Chapter 26.316. Staff Response: In 1982, the original hipped roof on the subject house was demolished and replaced with a new gable roof with multiple dormers. The original front porch was also demolished and replaced in a different configuration. The work was not under HPC's authority at the time. The photos below compare the west side of 101 E. Hallam in 1980 (left photo) to a more recent photo of the west side of the house(right photo). � 1 1 sif Y�ry r an ilt c>`�,�.-N - +A, I.t V*'' t.= �• ..._. 101 E. Hallam and 105 E. Hallam, the site directly to the east, were built by the Brown/Cowenhoven family, in 1885. The houses were mirror images of each other and a brick shed along the alley spans across the property line between the two neighbors.E he photos below compare the historic front of 105 E. Hallam to the current front of 101 • 1r 1 xjttt}iil it tif tti P24 The application before HPC proposes no exterior changes (no alterations,but also no restoration work)to the Victorian structure. A basement is proposed to be built below the house. The application focuses on modifying and expanding an addition at the rear of the building, reconfiguring living space and adding a one car garage. There is currently no parking area provided on this site. Parking has been occurring, without City approvals, in a-fenced in parking area on the public right of way to the west of the property. The total increase in floor area created by this project is 250 square foot. The gross increase is greater than that because the new basement and new garage make the home larger,but are mostly exempted from floor area calculations. Before the HPC application was submitted, staff encouraged the potential new buyer of this site to restore the original roof form, which is an action that would likely earn the 500 square foot floor area bonus. That is exactly the sort of purpose for which HPC has authority to allow this incentive. Restoration of the roof is a significant cost undertaking and would displace some of the living area that exists in the gable on the home today. The applicant chose not to request the bonus and not to disturb the historic area of the home. The north and south limits of the historic structure lie between the gridlines labeled"D"and"F"on the applicant's plans and elevations. South of gridline "D," (towards the alley) the applicant proposes to retain some of the existing non-historic addition, but add a garage on the ground floor, lengthen and widen the upper floor living space, and change the roofline to a more modern form. Staff finds that the work does not meet the design guidelines,particularly the following: 10.3 Design a new addition such that one's ability to interpret the historic character of the primary building is maintained. • A new addition that creates an appearance inconsistent with the historic character of the primary building is inappropriate. • An addition that seeks to imply an earlier period than that of the primary building also is inappropriate. • An addition that seeks to imply an inaccurate variation of the primary building's historic style should be avoided. • An addition that covers historically significant features is inappropriate. 10.4 Design a new addition to be recognized as a product of its own time. ❑ An addition should be made distinguishable from the historic building, while also remaining visually compatible with these earlier features. ❑ A change in setbacks of the addition from the historic building, a subtle change in material or a differentiation between historic, and more current styles are all techniques that may be considered to help define a change from old to new construction. 10.9 Roof forms should be similar to those of the historic building. ❑ Typically, gable, hip and shed roofs are appropriate. ❑ Flat roofs are generally inappropriate for additions on residential structures with sloped roofs. 10.11 On a new addition, use exterior materials that are compatible with the historic materials of the primary building. ❑ The new materials should be either similar or subordinate to the original materials. 3 P25 Even if the original roof form cannot be restored, this remodel is an opportunity to more clearly define the original house. The proposed roof on the new master bedroom is foreign to the historic structure and draws too much attention to the new construction. A modern addition has been allowed in many preservation projects, but a corner site is much more sensitive given the exposure to view on three sides. SETBACK VARIANCES The applicant requests setback variances on the east, west, rear and combined yards for existing and new construction, and a reduction of the required distance between the house and existing shed. In granting a variance, the HPC must make a finding that such a variance: a. Is similar to the pattern, features and character of the historic property or district; and/or b. Enhances or mitigates an adverse impact to the historic significance or architectural character of the historic property, an adjoining designated historic property or historic district. Staff Response: The historic house encroaches by about 6" into the west sideyard setback, and the existing rear addition encroaches about 6" into the east sideyard. The applicant proposes to maintain those conditions and to dig a basement that enjoys setback encroachments, albeit below grade. New lightwells proposed in the east sideyard appear to be larger than the minimum required by Building Code, and would therefore need a variance. Staff recommends that the basement excavation under the historic house be required to follow the footprint of the existing foundation and not create new expansions into the setback. Staff recommends all new construction, and the new lightwells,meet the setback requirements. The applicant requests a reduction in the 5' separation required between the new garage and the historic shed. Approximately 4' is provided. The applicant is asked to clarify why the size of the garage cannot be reduced, or the garage shifted to the west setback line to meet the required separation. Staff is unable to make a finding that allowing the garage to be too close to the historic shed is mitigating an adverse impact on that structure. The current property owner, and/or previous property owners, have made a number of improvements in the public right of way, including fences, a storage structure, parking, a gazebo, and a stone patio. The Engineering Department reviewed the property and determined in July that they will not approve encroachment licenses for any of these features and all will need to be removed, either as part of a building permit related to this project, or at another date to be determined by the Engineering Department. The Department feels that this determination is consistent with how they have handled other similar requests related to right of way encroachments that do not need to be retained due to having some historic significance. 4 P26 RELOCATION The intent of this Chapter is to preserve designated historic properties in their original locations as much of their significance is embodied in their setting and physical relationship to their surroundings as well as their association with events and people with ties to particular site. However, it is recognized that occasionally the relocation of a property may be appropriate as it provides an alternative to demolition or because it only has a limited impact on the attributes that make it significant The following standards apply for relocating a historic property as per Section 26.415.090.0 of the Municipal Code: C. Standards for the Relocation of Designated Properties Relocation for a building, structure or object will be approved if it is determined that it meets any one of the following standards: L It is considered a non-contributing element.of a historic district and its relocation will not affect the character of the historic district; or 2. It does not contribute to the overall character of the historic district or parcel on which it is located and its relocation will not have an adverse impact on the historic district or property; or 3. The owner has obtained a Certificate of Economic Hardship; or 4. The relocation activity is demonstrated to be an acceptable preservation method given the character and integrity of the building, structure or object and its move will not adversely affect the integrity of the historic district in which it was originally located or diminish the historic, architectural or aesthetic relationships of adjacent designated properties; and Additionally, for approval to relocate all of the following criteria must be met 1. It has been determined that the building, structure or object is capable of withstanding the physical impacts of relocation; and 2.An appropriate receiving site has been identified; and 3. An acceptable plan has been submitted providing for the safe relocation, repair and preservation of the building, structure or object including the provision of the necessary financial security. Staff Response: The existing house will remain where it is during this project. The historic house will gradually be underpinned with a new foundation and the full basement excavation will be completed. Although the house will not be lifted and moved during excavation, the standard assurances that the structure will be protected are required. A memo from a structural engineer addressing the preservation concerns must be submitted with the building permit. 5 P27 DECISION MAKING OPTIONS: The HPC may: • approve the application, • approve the application with conditions, • disapprove the application, or continue the application to a date certain to obtain additional information necessary to make a decision to approve or deny. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that Minor Development approval be continued for restudy. Exhibit: Resolution#____, Series of 2014 A. Design Guidelines B. Application "Exhibit A,Relevant Design Guidelines, 101 E.Hallam" 8.1 If an existing secondary structure is historically significant,then it must be preserved. • When treating a historic secondary building, respect its character-defining features. These include its primary and roof materials,roof form,windows, doors and architectural details. • If a secondary structure is not historically significant,then its preservation is optional. 8.3 Avoid attaching a garage or carport to the primary structure. this pattern ❑ Traditionally, 'a garage was sited as a separate structure at the rear of the lot; should be maintained. Any proposal to attach an accessory structure is reviewed on a case- by-case basis. 8.4 A garage door should be compatible with the character of the historic structure. ❑ A wood-clad hinged door is preferred on a historic structure. ❑ If an overhead door is used,the materials should match that of the secondary structure. ❑ If the existing doors are hinged, they can be adapted with an automatic opener. 10.3 Design a new addition such that one's ability to interpret the historic character of the primary building is maintained. ❑ A new addition that creates an appearance inconsistent with the historic character of the primary building is inappropriate. ❑ An addition that seeks to imply an earlier period than that of the primary building also is inappropriate. 6 P28 ❑ An addition that seeks to imply an inaccurate variation of the primary building's historic style should be avoided. ❑ An addition that covers historically significant features is inappropriate. 10.4 Design a new addition to be recognized as a product of its own time. ❑ An addition should be made distinguishable from the historic building, while also remaining visually compatible with these earlier features. ❑ A change in setbacks of the addition from the historic building, a subtle change in material or a differentiation between historic, and more current styles are all techniques that may be considered to help define a change from old to new construction. 10.6 Design an addition to be compatible in size and scale with the main building. ❑ An addition that is lower than or similar to the height of the primary building is preferred. 10.8 Place an addition at the rear of a building or set it back from the front to minimize the visual impact on the historic structure and to allow the original proportions and character to remain prominent. ❑ Locating an addition at the front of a structure is inappropriate. ❑ Additional floor area may also be located under the building in a basement which will not alter the exterior mass of a building. ❑ Set back an addition from primary facades in order to allow the original proportions and character to remain prominent. A minimum setback of 10 feet on primary structures is recommended. 10.9 Roof forms should be similar to those of the historic building. • Typically, gable,hip and shed roofs are appropriate. • Flat roofs are generally inappropriate for additions on residential structures with sloped roofs. 10.11 On a new addition, use exterior materials that are compatible with the historic materials of the primary building. ❑ The new materials should be either similar or subordinate to the original materials. 7 P29 ATTACHMENT 2 - Historic Preservation Land Use Application PROJECT: rNa me: 101 E Hallam ca tion: 101 E Hallam Street,Aspen, CO 81611 CITY AND TOWNSITE OF ASPEN Block: 65 Lot: A&W 4.86' OF LOT B (Indicate street address,lot&block number or metes and bounds description of property) Parcel 1D# (REQUIRED)273512437001 APPLICANT: Name: Hallam LLC Address: 715 W Main Street, Ste 204,Aspen CO 81611 Phone#: 970-279-4109 Fax#: E-mail: swilson @forumphi.com REPRESENTATIVE: Name: Steev Wilson Address: 715 W Main Street, Ste 204,Aspen CO 81611 Phone#: 970-279-4109 Fax#: E-mail: ;ilson@forumphi.com TYPE OF APPLICATION: (please check all that apply): FnHistoric Designation Relocation(temporary,on or off-site) ficate ofNo Negative Effect Demolition(total ficate of Appropriateness demolition) ❑ -Minor Historic Development Historic Landmark Lot Split ❑ -Major Historic Development 0 -Conceptual Historic Development ❑ -Final Historic Development -Substantial Amendment EXISTING CONDITIONS: (description of existing buildings, uses,previous approvals,etc.) Single family historic structure originally constructed in 1888 with previous non-historic upper level and roof addition. PROPOSAL: (description of 2roposed buildings,uses, modifications,etc.) ETTT�i sed addition with subordinate linking element and new basement under both historic and proposed. xis m g is oric s ruc ure wi e e in p ace an un erpmne . Aspen Historic Preservation Land Use Application Requirements, Updated:May 29,2007 P30 ATTACHMENT 3- Dimensional Requirements Form (Item#10 on the submittal requirements key. Not necessary for all projects.) Project: 101 E Hallam Street Applicant: Steev Wilson on behalf of Hallam LLC Project Location: 101 E Hallam Street,Aspen CO, 81611 Zone District: R-6 Lot Size: 3,486 SQ FT Lot Area: 3,486 SQ FT (For the purposes of calculating Floor Area, Lot Area may be reduced for areas within the high water mark, easements, and steep slopes. Please refer to the definition of Lot Area in the Municipal Code.) Commercial net leasable: Existing: 0 Proposed: 0 Number of residential units: Existing:—, proposed: 1 Number of bedrooms: Existing: 2 Proposed: 4 Proposed %of demolition: DIMENSIONS: (write n/a where no requirement exists in the zone district) Floor Area: Existing: 2,256.5 Allowable: 2,536.08 Proposed: 2,504.02 Height Principal Bldg.: Existing: 23'8" Allowable: 25' Proposed: 23'8" Accessory Bldg.: Existing: 12'6" Allowable: Proposed: 12'6" On-Site parking: Existing: 1 Required: 2 Proposed.-- 1 %Site coverage: Existing: n/a Required: n/a Proposed: n/a %Open Space: Existing: n/a Required: n/a Proposed: n/a Front Setback: Existing: 10' Required.• 10' Proposed: 10' Rear Setback: Existing: 10' Required: 10' Proposed: 10' Combined Front/Rear: Indicate N, S E W Existing: 20' Required: 20' Proposed: 20' Side Setback: W Existing: 5' Required: 5' Proposed: 4.5' Side Setback: E Existing. 4'8" Required: 5' Proposed: 4'8" Combined Sides: Existing: 10' Required: 10' —Proposed.-_ 9.5' Distance between Existing: 117' Required: 5' Proposed: 3'10" buildings: Existing non-conformities or encroachments and note if encroachment licenses have been issued: Variations requested (identify the exact variances needed): Aspen Historic Preservation Land Use Application Requirements, Updated:May 29,2007 P31 ARCHfIECTURe;HNIE..3.;is{ _.....<.. FORUMIPHI QRf.:.:...i.CC:.. I TO: Chris Bendon, Community Development Director FROM: Forum Phi RE: 101 E Hallam Street DATE: June 30, 2014 Dear Director, Forum Phi requests your approval of an HPC Land Use Application based on the"temporary relocation" standards for a historic structure located at 101 E Hallam Street.The subject property is listed on the Aspen Inventory of Historic Landmark Sites and Structures.The single-family residence was previously remodeled with a non-historic addition in 1972. There will be a substantial subgrade/basement addition underneath the historic structure which will cause it to be temporarily shored in place.The existing non-historic main and upper level additions will be remodeled, in addition to a new garage located directly off the alley. The Land Use Application for Conceptual Review is complete per the City of Aspen Community Development Department's Historic Preservation Application Package. Sincerely, Steev Wilson, AIA P32 City of Aspen Review Standards Compliance 26.410.040. Residential Design Standards A. Site Design. 1. Building orientation. The lot is a comer lot and the existing street-facing facades are parallel to the intersection streets (Hallam Street and Garmisch Street). 2. Build-to lines, The lot is a corner lot and more than 60%of the facade is within five feet of the minimum setback. 3. Fences. The existing three-foot fence along the property line is less than 42 inches and will remain. B. Building form. 1. Secondary mass. The lot contains an existing historic structure to remain that predates the residential design standards. C. Parking, garages and carports. 1. For all residential uses that have access from an alley or private road, the[listed] standards shall apply: The proposed garage door is a single stall door and is visible from the alley. 2. For all residential uses that have access only from a public street, the[listed] standards shall apply: The garage door is a single stall door and is accessed from an alley, therefore this section does not apply. D. Building elements. 1. Street oriented entrance and principal window. The existing historic house has a street-oriented entrance and a street-facing principal window to remain. a) The existing entry door to remain is no more than ten(10) feet back from the front- most wall of the building and is not taller than eight(8)feet. b) The existing front porch is greater than 50 square feet with a minimum depth of six feet. The entry porch is one story in height. c) The existing street-facing facades contain significant groups of windows. 2. First story element. The lot contains an existing historic structure to remain that predates the residential design standards. 3. Windows. a) The existing and proposed street-facing windows do not span between nine and Avelve feet above the finished floor. b) The existing historic structure contains one non-orthogonal window to remain on the front facade. All proposed windows are orthogonal. P33 4. Lightwells. d behind the front-roost wal!of the building and are not The proposed lightwelis are recesse located on the street-facing facade. E.Context. 1. Materials. a) The quality of the exterior materials and their application is consistent on all sides of the building. b) The use of materials are true to their characteristics. Proposed materials will be approved at the HPC Final Review. c) There are no proposed highly reflective materials. Proposed materials will be approved at the HPC Final Review. 2. Inflection. a) This parcel is less than six thousand(6,000)square feet therefore this section does not apply. P34 City of Aspen Historic Preservation Design Guidelines Introduction The property at 101 E Hallam Street is listed in the Aspen Inventory of Historic Landmark Sites and Structures.As required for submittal, this letter of compliance is for HPC Conceptual Review. Streetscape and Lot Features This project is located on Lot A, on the corner of Hallam Street and Garmisch Street. The lot encroaches 4.86 feet to the west into Lot B. The property received a variance in 1998 for"a four foot rear yard and a five foot side yard setback variance". The property has a grass planting strip from a fence at the property line to the street. A single brick sidewalk extends from Hallam Street to the front porch and jogs ninety-degrees to align with the front door. Two large conifer trees are located on either side of this walk. There is no public sidewalk to separate the planting strip from the property line. Another private walk extends from Garmisch Street to the west side of the house.A row of four Aspen trees line the fence along the property line on the Garmisch Street side.All existing trees on site will remain and any affected plantings will be reestablished. A three-foot wrought-iron fence borders the property line along both the Hallam and Garmisch Street sides. The west and rear(southwest) portion of the lot has an existing six-foot non-historic wood fence surrounding a pergola and patio area. This pergola area will be removed. The site does not have any historic retaining walls, and no new retaining walls are proposed at this time. There are ceiling-mounted sconces located under both the historic front porch and the side porch. A street lamp post is located at the corner of the Hallam and Garmisch Streets.All other proposed site lighting will be shielded. All streetscape features will be returned to existing conditions. Historic Building Materials The primary historic building material is brick, with a non-historic upper level addition of shingle siding. The brick has been well-maintained and any areas requiring repair will be done in place. A portion of the non-historic addition will be remodeled with new materials, primarily horizontal stained cedar siding. The existing roof was remodeled as part of a non-historic addition in 1972. The proposed roof will be standing seam metal, to be distinguishable from the 1972 shake shingle roof. Any demolition to occur will be primarily interior and to non-historic portions of the exterior. Windows All historic windows on the existing structure are located on the lower level; the 1972 upper level addition is not historic.All historic windows maintain the original character, although it appears several have been previously replaced. The existing historic windows will remain unchanged and will receive proper maintenance where required. These windows are double hung type with brick arch tops and brick sills. All historic windows will receive repairs where required, with no changes to character-defining features. Replacement windows are not anticipated for the historic portions of the project. If required, any replacements will preserve the historic character of openings, design, materials, size and proportion, and profile. P35 Storm windows may be installed to enhance energy performance of the historic structure, but have not been proposed at this early phase in design. Doors The historic structure has two remaining historic glass paneled doors.The first is the primary entry facing Hallam Street;the second entry on the west facade facing Ge appearance,dStreet. esi to and e doors will be maintained in order to preserve integrity, function, size, app 9 third h The istoric cI entry doors will not be on he replaced and storm facade, but thedhistoric rdoor is no longer intact.This third rY opening leads to a crawlspace access area. Porches The primary porch on the front facade has been previously removed and replaced, and will be maintained in its existing condition.A second covered entry on the west facade is not historic but will be maintained in its existing condition. A previous remodel included the addition of a pergola structure and at-grade patio on the southwest portion of the property. The pergola and patio area is surrounded by a six-foot non- historic wood fence. This pergola area will be removed. Architectural Details Distinct architectural details exist on the historic structure, specifically the porch columns and brick arches over historic windows and doors.These details represent those typical of the late 1800s and will be maintained and repaired only where required.Any repairs and/or replacements to historic features will be documented prior to submission of a building permit and construction. Roofs The existing roof structure was previously replaced and is not historic. It appears no portion o t e original historic roof remains intact. Secondary Structures The property contains a secondary common building which abuts the alleyway and is shared between both properties at 101 Hallam and 105 Hallam.This structure appears to be historic, as it is shown on a Sanborn Insurance Map of Aspen from 1890. The structure is a one-story brick building that has been covered by clapboard siding on the north and west facades, and covered by concrete in other areas.The shake shingle roof has been previously replaced and will be maintained where required.The structure will remain and be remodeled on the interior for a proposed use. Building Relocation &Foundations The proposed design includes the addition of a basement/lower level directly underneath the ructure will remain and will be shored in place existing structure.The location of the original st while a basement with new foundation walls are constructed below. The new foundation will be similar in design and materials to the historic foundation.Two proposed lightwells will be added to the east side of the building, recessed behind the front facade. Building Additions I addition was constructed on the historic structure. During this In the early 1980s, a second-leve addition,the historic roof was demolished and reconstructed.A portion of the previous addition P36 will be demolished and remodeled. The proposed addition has been designed such that the character of the historic structure is maintained, with a linking element that is recessed behind the west elevation. The proposed addition is designed to be recognized as a product of its own time. The style of the proposed addition is modern and will be located at the rear of the historic structure, with minimal visibility from the street-facing facade. It is distinguishable from the historic structure with horizontal siding and a metal roof. The roof of the proposed addition is designed at a slightly lower elevation than the historic structure and will not interfere with the existing roof.All portions of the addition will be located behind the primary street-facing setback. Most of the new floor area will be located subgrade. The proposed floor area is approximately 2,498 square feet. This is below the maximum allowable FAR for the parcel (2,536 square feet). This project is not within the Main Street Historic District nor the Commercial Core Historic District, and does not involve a new primary structure on a historic parcel. General Guidelines The historic structure is constructed of brick with painted dark brown and dark tan accents of the porch and non-historic second story addition. The original accent colors will be researched and all attempts will be made to return the historic portion to its original.Any new color schemes chosen for the historic structure will be simple, coordinated, and consistent with the character of a Victorian built in the late 1800s. The proposed addition will also be coordinated with the historic scheme, while remaining distinguishable in color and material. Exterior lighting has not been completely developed at the conceptual level, but will be simple in form and detail. Existing lights on the historic structure will remain.Any proposed site lighting will be shielded and/or low intensity. Visual impacts from interior lighting will be subdued. The surface of the historic structure will be maintained, repaired, and cleaned where necessary. The methods used will be low impact and follow the recommendations of the preservation design guidelines. Any repainting methods will be planned carefully. Mechanical and service areas will be located within the proposed addition. All service areas will be visually blocked from the primary street facade. All facades of the historic structure will remain free of mechanical and service equipment. The proposed garage will be accessed from the existing alleyway via a paved driveway. A small parking area will be located on the driveway. The driveway will be screened by landscaping from the primary building facade. The project is a single-family residence and will not utilize any signage. P37 120 EAST MAIN PARTNERS LLC BRADY WILLIAM JB III I11 WEST FRANCIS LLC 14671 FIELDSTONE DR 120 E MAIN ST 28 ROCK RIDGE AVE ASPEN,CO 8T SARATOGA,CA 95070 3REENWICH,CT 06831 CITY OF ASPEN COLLINS CINDA REV TRUST BROCKWAY LEXIE 130 S GALENA ST 42 PARK LN 7714 FISHER ISLAND DR ASPEN,CO 81611 MINNEAPOLIS,MN 55416 FISHER ISLAND,FL 33109-0966 DTJ LEGACY PROPERTIES LLC BOX 22 93 CRAWFORD RANDALL&ABIGAIL DO FAMILY TRUST 202 W 19TH ST I BOX 22 124 N GARMISCH ST W ASPEN,CO 81611 WINTER PARK,FL 32790 EL DORADO,AR 71730 GARCIA STEVEN J GARMISCH LODGING LLC ERWIN GREGORY D 120 N GARMISCH 110 W MAIN ST PO BOX 4470 ASPEN,CO 81611 ASPEN,CO 81611 BASALT,CO 81621 GSW FAMILY INV LP HENRY FREDERICK B TRUST HOGUET CONSTANCE M 100 W HALLAM ST 333 E 68TH ST 1320 HUNSICKER RD ASPEN,CO 81611 NEW YORK,NY 10065 LANCASTER,PA 17601 JAMMB LLC JOHNSON RICHARD&MONTAE IMBT PO RUMM BOX DONALD PAUL REV TRUST 500 S DIXIE HWY STE 201 6820 AS,TX 7RY DALL 5230 ASPEN,CO 81612 AS,TX 7 CORAL GABLES,FL 33146 LANDIS CAROLYN MOUNTAIN STATE PROPERTIES LLC P16 N GARMISCH ST 128 N GARMISCH ST 715 10TH ST SOUTH ASPEN,CO 81612 ASPEN, CO 81611 NAPLES,FL 34102 RODNEY JOHN W ROSE BRANDON PENN PAUL E&SUSAN W 8536 N GOLF DR 625 MT HOPE RD 3830 E 79TH ST WHARTON,NJ 07885 INDIANAPOLIS,IN 46260-3457 PARADISE VALLEY,AZ 85253 SARDY HOUSE NEW LLC SPEARS NANCY M WOLKENMUTH EDWARD F JR&STEELE 240 CRANDON BLVD#167 PO BOX 2630 121 W NE BELL REV TRUST ASPEN,CO 81612 121 W BLEEKER ST KEY BISCAYNE, FL 33149 ASPEN,CO 81611 ZATS JULIE 118 N GARMISCH ASPEN,CO 81611 _ FORUM PHI y- 101 E Hallam St Aspen,Colorado 81611 -W, CONSULTANTS ;7-1 3,0 S Galena Street Aspen,Colorado 81611 (970)925-3816 rr ••.. .. �',e•�lt. . p ! ��' '` i I ` -. ��i.` .�;=� ' M`�, � i.i���i a� ,;t-�n�'�•y�y � K+i.�. ��,flk l aspensuweyors@gmail corn CIVIL 111L I •I�lj r!i, �t� �. t �'ai„ 1., r►• .�r �t4c`f�:�yli�'r"�' r. mow:" ►', ``i�l i� � Eti ''I 3.'� r1'' s. r I� ��� 'I yit '� r I��r +�, ��' s,: "." ir1► ,��t . i �• �� . -. i . . l +� . r .�: \ E cam' ! � •!1.. �� `►I l.,�1.. 1� rte. a�� t i1�� � rw4PI ` y /�; 4�!l �t�iri ��y :. � j�' INS' .t t ' I /� � � `• r+� _ a Sal/!♦, 1) ,w� .! \.. 11 9. I'�'I� �+ !!',nor 1 a,IN&A "�+ ;•` ;'-mil �'' Vii` j; ;;' °.'� 'r!� '�, `' '� t�< ; � .Ni �� '�'� fOW'- ``' STRUCTURAL �!�' 1� ' • '' � �' �,, !I(� .,� �'�► . .�I asi�4.' ri "„"�..-----------__.; _ - 1oft,� ,. ,�." . f �� ��;�;,��� ��� ;( � , �� � 11 � r ,� ;`�4�: ��,,� rr �►� CONTRACTOR 7-014 DATEOFPUBLI—ON 1 I: � ``►•tar 1 - � - �� t ( ! y I i` '!�"� I•� II.III ( ��� I�s,,-;t �. c �.�_ bN_ SO 6/30114 HPC CONCEPT REV PROJECT•�� I �.•rAi� _ a..,MY'rM !. I 11� I� i +'ii� ;I �`. A A r i2`_I,� ..:;t S�i���llf I�illlll t+�` IIIi i�l�ll�ll�� IlLlrll �4•.w.'°.rr` "'"""!,�,,,,,:1 �, ' I�l!��� `I 1 ; 'I i� ; �I I� � ����I'��I�I'l�llillll�lll �� _,.�:• "'' NO: 141 DRAWN COPYRIGHT FORUM PHI.LLC 1 -- •- • • _ • • : • COVER 715 West Main Street,Suite 204 Aspen,Colorado 81611 P:970279.4157 F:866.770.5585 101 E HALLAM HALLAM LLC 101 E Hallam St Aspen,Colorado 81611 CONSULTANTS SURVEYOR Aspen Survey Engineers,Inc. 210 S Galena Street Aspen,Colorado 81611 (970)925-3816 aspensu eyors @gmail.com CIVIL TBD MECHANICAL TBD RESOLUTION NO.a_ Section 3. Conditions Upon Which Variance is Granted. Series of 1998 3. The grunt of variance will be generally consistent with the purposes, goals, objectives, and policies of the The variance granted by Section 2, above, is epee if icnlly A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT OF THE CITY OF ASPEN Aspen Area Comprehensive Plan and Chapter 24 of the conditioned upon and subject to the following conditions: GRANTING A VARIANCE WITH CONDITIONS IN CASE NUMBER 98-3 STRUCTURAL RELATING TO PROPERTIES IN THE CITY OF ASPEN WITH STREET ADDRESSES Aspen Municipal Code. 1. No balcony or similar improvement shall be permitted TBD OF 101 EAST HALLAM STREET AND 105 EAST HALLAM STREET, within the east aide yard setback. ASPEN,COLORADO AND LEGAL DESCRIPTIONS OF LOT A AND THE WESTERLY 4. The grant of variance is the minimum variance that 4.96 FEET OF LOT B, BLOCK 65; AND TH8 EAST 25.14 FEET OF LOT B AND will make possible the reasonable use of the parcel, building or structure. 2. Unless vested as part of a development plan pursuant to THE WEST S FEET OF LOT C, BLOCK 65, CITY AND TOWNSITE OF ASPEN, Section 24-6-207 of the Aspen Municipal Code, the variance granted ed S. The literal interpretation and enforcement of the herein shall automatically expire after twelve (12) months from CONTRACTOR WHEREAS, Mr. Donald Krumm and Mr. Alan Bush have made the date of approval unless development has been commenced as terms of Chapter 24 of the Aspen Municipal Code TBD would de the applicant of rights coamwnly enjoyed evidenced by the issuance of a building permit, or an extension deprive anted b the Board in which case the variance -hall expire at application, dated April 1, 1998 to the Board of Adjustment for a by other parcel. in the a— zone district, and would the y cause the applicant unnecessary hardship or practical the end of the extension. variance from the dimensional requirsments of Chapter 24 of the difficulty. In determining that the applicant's rights variance, the Board 3. Applicant shall, prior to filing an application for a Aspen Municipal Code; and would be deprived absent a with the Clerk and considered certain special condition. and circum- building permit, cause to be recorded 71212014 onre OF auauunory Recorder'e Office of Pitkin County a copy of this resolution. �-�---- --- WHEREAS, this matter came on for hearing before the Board of stances which are unique to the parcel, building or -tructure, which are not applicable to other parcels, INTRODUCED, READ AND ADOPTED by the Board of Adjustment structures or buildings in tlhe same zone district and -- Adjustment on April 30, 1998 and after full deliberations and of the City of Aspen on t 7th day May, 1998 which do not result from the actions of the applicant; --- --- consideration of the evidence and testimony preeented. to wit. ' NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE BOARD OF ADaUSTMENT OF The existing both properties,location of the the non- Chai erson ----- ----- shed, which ethane both properties, combined with the non- - - conforming lot width of the properties, significantly I, the undersigned duly appointed and acting Deputy TAE CITY OF ASPEN, COLORADO: -_ - conetraine the area available for development. City Clerk do certify that the foregoing is a true and accurate copy of that resolution adopted by the Hoard of Adjustment of the -- �� -SO Section 1. Findings of Fact. i City of Aspen, Colorado, at a meeting held on the day hareinabove _ 4 C CONCEPT.REV. The Board of Ad stated. The Hoard of Adjustment makes the following findings of section d f Variance Adjuse Granted ��f-��- fact: juetmeat done hereby grant the applicant the e�D putt'City Clark� � PROJECT NO:___1411 _ following variance from the terms of Chapter 24 of the Aspen DRAWN BY: KPT . 1. A development application for a variance was initiated Municipal Code: Approved as to content: _- by: Mr.DOnald Krumm and Hr. Alan Bush for properties ea with etreat addressee of 101 East Hallam Street and 105 East A four foot rear yard and a five foot aide yard setback COPYRIGHT FORUM PHI,LLC Hallam Street, Aspen, Colorado. variance at both 101 East Hallam and 105 East Hallam to allow for the expansion of an existing shed by 4 1/2 feet to the west of the Aeaistant City Attor y 2. Notice of the proposed variance has been provided to existing west wall of said shed. surrounding property owner. in accordance with Section 24-6- 205(E)(4)b) of the Aapen e. Evidence of ouch Municipal Cod - notice is on file with the City Clerk. 111111111 2 IIII 41 t 1111111 RII IIIIII 111111111111111111111111111111111 IN 3. t� 1t- 424370 11/11/1000 00:268 RESOLUTE DAVIS SILVI IIIIII VIII IIIIII III IIIIIII IIIIII VIII III III+)IIII In 424370 11/11/1006 06!268 RESOLUTI ORVIS SILVI 3 of 3 R 16.00 D 0.00 N 0.00 FITKIN COUNTY CO SHEET TITLE 424370 11/11/1006 00-268 RESOLUTE DAVIS SILVI 2 e1 3 R 16.00 D 0.00 N 0.00 PITKIN COIMTY CO 1 of 3 R 15.00 0 0.00 N 0.00 PITKIN COUNTY CO Resolution No 2 of 1998 Resolution No.2 of 1998 Resolution No 2 of 1998 LAND USE APPROVALS ORDINANCE NO.16 (SERIES OF 2001) C. Designer. The structure is a significant work of an architect or designer whose individual work has influenced the character of Aspen. AN ORDINANCE OF THE ASPEN CITY COUNCIL GRANTING APPROVAL Section 2: Pursuant to the findings set forth in Section 1,above,the City Council does FOR LANDMARK DESIGNATION OF 101 E.HALLAM STREET,LOT A AND D. Neighborhood Character. The structure or site is a significant component of hereby designate as an Historic Landmark 101 F.Hallam Street,Lot A and the west 4.86 9. THE WEST 4.86 FEET OF LOT B,BLOCK 65,CITY AND TOWNSITE OF an historically significant neighborhood and the preservation of the structure or feet of Lot B,Block 65,City and Townsite of Aspen,without conditions. ASPEN site is important for the maintenance of that neighborhood character. Section 3: If any section, subsection, sentence,clause, phrase or portion of this Parcel Identification No.2735-124-37-001 E. Community Character. The structure or site is critical to the preservation of ordinance is for any reason held invalid or unconstitutional by any court of competent the character of the Aspen community because of its relationship in terms of sires, jurisdiction,such provision and such holding shall not affect the validity of the remaining location and architectural similarity to other structures or sites of historical or portions thereof. WHEREAS,the applicants,Jim and Patricia Gorman,represented by'Nary A.Avjian architectural importance;and Architects,have requested landmark designation for the property at 101 E.Hallam Street, Section 4: This Ordinance shall not affect any existing litigation and shall not operate as A Lot A and the west 4.86 feet of Lot B,Block 65,City and Townsite of Aspen;and WHEREAS, the Aspen City Council has reviewed and considered the Landmark an abatement of any action or proceeding now pending under or by virtue of the 715 West Main Street,Sude 204 Designation, has reviewed and considered those recommendations made by the ordinances repealed or amended as herein provided,and the same shall be conducted and Aspen,Colorado 81611 WHEREAS,pursuant to Section 26.420.020,requests for landmark designation shall be Community Development Department,the Historic Preservation Commission,and the concluded under such prior ordinances. P:970279.4157 F:866.770.5585 reviewed and recommended for approval,approval with conditions,or disapproval by the Planning and Zoning Commission,and has taken and considered public comment at a Community Development Director, by the HPC, and by the Planning and Zoning public hearing;and Section 5: A public hearing on the Ordinance was held on the 14th day of May,2001 at Commission at a public hearing,and then approved,approved with conditions,or 5:00 P.M.in the City Council Chambers,Aspen City Hall,Aspen Colorado,fifteen(15) disapproved at a public hearing by the City Council;and WHEREAS,the City Council finds that the Landmark Designation meets or exceeds all days prior to which hearing a public notice of the same was published once in a 101 E HALLAM applicable development standards of the above referenced Municipal Code sections:and newspaper of general circulation within the City of Aspen. WHEREAS,the Community Development Director performed an analysis of the HALLAM LLC application based on the standards, found favorably for the application, and WHEREAS,the applicant requests,and Council hereby approves a yew; $2,000 INTRODUCED,READ AND ORDERED PUBLISHED as provided by law,by the en, E Colorado 1 recommended approval of landmark designation;and landmark grant pursuant to Section 26 420.030,if available in this fiscal year:and City Council of the City of Aspen on the 23rd day of April,2001. ASP0r1,COlOf8d0 81611 WHEREAS,the Aspen Historic Preservation Commission reviewed and recommended WHEREAS,the City Council finds that this Ordinance furthers and is necessary for the / approval of landmark designation by a vote of 5-1 on April 11,2001;and public health,safety and welfare. /�t✓i WHEREAS,the.Aspen Planning and Zoning Commission reviewed and recommended NOW,THEREFORE,BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE Rachel E.Richards,N or approval of landmark designation by a vote of 5 to 0 on April 17,2001;and CITY OF ASPEN,COLORADO,THAT: \,glaPE97trf%,,, WHEREAS,all applications for Historic Landmark Designation shall meet two or more Section 1: Pursuant to Section 26.420,020 of the Municipal Code,the City Council of the following Standards for Designation of Section 26.420.010 in order for Council to finds as follows in regard to the Historic Landmark Designation and Grant Request: _ grant approval,namely: 1. The applicant's submission is complete and sufficient to afford review and *K.athqryn S m it,City Clerk A. Historical Importance: The structure or site is a principal or secondary evaluation for approval;and, structure,or site commonly identified or associated with a person or event of historical significance to the cultural,social,or political history of Aspen,the 2. The landmark designation is appropriate,finding that standards A (historical APPROVED AS TO FORM: State of Colorado,or the United States. importance), B (architectural importance), D (neighborhood character) and E (community character)of Section 26.420.010 are met;and CONSULTANTS R.ArchileUrtral lmportanre. The structure or site reflects an architectural style that is unique,distinct or of traditional Aspen character,or the structure or site 3. The property is eligible for,and the applicant shall receive a$2,000 landmark SURVEYOR embodies the distinguishing characteristics of a significant or unique architectural designation grant,if funds are available in this fiscal year. JohD ore seer,City Attorney Aspen Survey Engineers,Inc. type(based on building form or use),or specimen. 210 S Galena Street Aspen,Colorado 81611 111111 11111 111111���I��111 111111 111111 111 11111 11�1 1111 III IIIII III/III/ (970)sir ey16 155762 06/25/2001 11:218 OROINWIC DAVIS SILVI aspensurveyors@gmail.com 477752 06/25/2001 11.21a ORDINANC DAVIS SILVI 2 of 4 R 20.00 0 0.00 N 0.00 PITKIN COUNTY CO I IIIIII VIII"III'IIIIII III IIIIII IIIIII III VIII/III/III CIVIL I of 4 R 20.00 0 0.00 N 0.00 PITKIN COUNTY CO 457702 06125/2001 11:218 ORDINRNC DAVIS SILVI 3 of 4 R 20.00 D 0.00 N 0.00 PITKIN COUNTY CO TBD Resolution No 16 of 2001 Resolution No 16 of 2001 Resolution No.16 of 2001 MECHANICAL TBD STRUCTURAL TBD FINALLY,adopted,passed and approved this 14th day of May,2001. /J / �/ CONTRACTOR (c��(i TBD achel E.Richards,M or 7212014 DATE OF PUBLIG7ON KathryD r. o.oiena��sr=rKM,p<rc.K,r:�,am.,viotenurora SD 6/30/14 HPC CONCEPT.REV. PROJECT NO: 1411 DRAWN BY KPT COPYRIGHT FORUM PHI,LLC 1 5576 06 25/2 111111 III VIII/VIII/III VIII/III/III 455762 06/25/2001 .00 N .00 ORDINANC PITKIN DAVIS SILVZ 4 of 4 R 20.00 D 0.00 N 0.00 PITKIN COUNTY CO SHEET TITLE Resolution No.16 of 2001 LAND USE APPROVALS RESOLUTION OF THE ASPEN PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION APPROVING AN APPLICATION FOR HISTORIC LANDMARK DESIGNATION FOR THE PROPERTY LOCATED AT 101 E.HALLAM D. Neighborhood Character. The structure or site is a significant component of STREET,LOT A AND THE WEST 4.86 FEET OF LOT B,CITY AND an historically significant neighborhood and the preservation of the structure or TOWNSITE OF ASPEN,COLORADO site is important for the maintenance of that neighborhood character. PARCEL IDg2735-124-37-001 F. Community Character. The structure or site is critical to the preservation of the character of the Aspen community because of its relationship in terms of siu, location and architectural similarity to other structures or sites of historical or RESOLUTION NO.17,SERIES OF 2001 architectural importance;and WHEREAS,the applicants,Jim and Patricia Gorman,have requested Historic Landmark WHEREAS,during a duly noticed public hearing on April 17,2001,the Aspen Planning Designation for the property located at 101 E.Hallam Street,Lot A and the west 4.86 teeL and Zoning Commission considered the recommendation made by the Community 715 West Main Street,Suite 204 of Lot B,Block 65,City and Tow site of Aspen,Colorado. The property is currently Development Director and HPC, took and considered public testimony and Aspen,Colorado 81611 listed on the"Inventory of Historic Sites and Structures'%and recommended,by a vote of 5 to 0,that City Council approve landmark designation P:970.279 4157 F:866.770.5585 finding that standards A,B,D and E are met. WHEREAS,pursuant to Section 26.420.020,requests for landmark designation shall be reviewed and recommended for approval,approval with conditions,or disapproval by the NOW,THEREFORE,BE IT RESOLVED: Community Development Director. by the HPC, and by the Planning and Zoning Commission at a public hearing,and then approved,approved with conditions,or That the Planning and Zoning Commission recommends Council approve landmark 101 E HALLAM disapproved at a public hearing by the City Council;and designation for 101 E.Hallam Street,Lot A and the west 4.86 feet of Lot B,Block 65. HALLAM LLC City and Townsite of Aspen.Colorado 101 E Hallam St WHEREAS, the Community Development Director performed an analysis of the Aspen,Colorado 81611 application based on the standards.. found favorably for the application, and APPROVED by the Commissioner its regular meeting on April 17,2001. recommended approval of landmark designation.and WHEREAS,the Aspen Historic Preservation Commission reviewed and recommended APPROVED AS TO FORM: PLANNING AND ZONING approval of landmark designation by a vole uf5-1 on April 11,2001:and COMMISSION: s WHEREAS,all applications for Historic Landmark Designation shall meet two or more of the following Standards for Designation of Section 26.420.010 in order for P&Z to grant approval,namely: City Attomey V Robert BTaich,Chair A. Historical Importance: The structure or site is a principal or secondary structure or site commonly identified or associated with a person or event of historical significance to the cultural,social,or political history of Aspen,the ATTEST: State of Colorado,or the United States. B.Architectural Importance. The structure or site reflects an architectural style - that is unique,distinct or of traditional Aspen character,or the structure or site CONSULTANTS embodies the distinguishing characteristics of a significant or unique architectural ] ie Lothian.Deputy City Clerk type(based on building form or use),or specimen. SURVEYOR Aspen Survey Engineers.Inc. C. Designer. The strocmre is a significant work of an architect or designer 210 S Galena Street whose individual work has influenced the character of Aspen. Aspen,Colorado 81611 (970)925-3616 aspensurveyors@g mail.com I111111IIIII111111 MIN III 111111111111III11111IIIIIIII 1111111(IIII111111111111III1111111IIIII111111111111IIII CIVIL 455766 06/23/2001 11:24R RESOLUTI DAVIS SILVI N776e 06/27/2001 11124A RESOLUTI DAVIS SILVI 1 et 2 R 10.00 D 0.00 N 0.00 PITKIN COUNT/CO 2 at 2 R 10.00 D 0.00 N 0.00 PITK2N COUNTY CO TED Resolution No.17 of 2001 Resolution No 17 of 2001 MECHANICAL TBD 4. Standard: The proposed development enhances or does not diminish from the Conditions of approval are known and understood and must meet with the Historic RESOLUTION OF THE ASPEN HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION architectural character or integrity of a designated historic structure or pan Preservation Officer l are to thereof;and p applying for the building permit. APPROVING AN APPLICATION FOR FINAL DEVELOPMENT AND 9. The General Contractor and/or Superintendent shall be required to obtain a STRUCTURAL VARIANCES FOR THE PROPERTY LOCATED AT 101 E.HALLAM STREET, specialty license in historic preservation prior[o receiving a building permit. WHEREAS,Amy Guthrie,in her staff report dated October 10,2001,performed an TBD LOT E AND THE WEST F L FEET OF LOT B,AND 105 E.HALLAM STREET, analysis of the application based on the standards,and recommended approval of the 10.The applicant shall provide a plan for the active protection and shoring of the shed THE EAST 25.14 FEET OF LOT B AND THE WEST 8 FEET OF LOT C,BLOCK on 105 E.Hallam. This plan,a,well as thorough documentation of the existing (x5,CITY AND TOWNSITE OF ASPEN,COLORADO project;and shed,including photographs and measured drawings,will be required prior to WHEREAS,at their regular meeting on October 10,2001,the Historic Preservation issuance ofbuilding permit, PARCEL IDN27J5.124-37-001&2735-124-37-002 Commission considered the application,found the application to meet the standards and 11.The applicant shall provide the City with a written agreement between themselves to be consistent with the"City of Aspen Historic Preservation Design Guidelines'and and the owner of 105 E.Hallam Street describing that measures that will be taken CONTRACTOR RESOLUTION#45,SERIES OF 2001 approved the application by a vote of 4 to 2. to protect the half of the shed that it is hoped can be preserved,and the manner in TBD which any damage that may occur shall be corrected. WHEREAS,the applicants,Jim and Patricia Gorman,represented by Mary Holley,have NOW,THEREFORE,BE IT RESOLVED: requested Final Development approval and Variances for the property located at 101 E. Hallam Street,Lot A and the west 4.86 feet of Lot B,and 105 E.Hallam Street,the east That Final Development and Variances for the property located at 101 E.Hallam Street, 25.14 feet of Lot B and the west 8 feet of Lot C,Block 65,City and Townsite of Aspen. Lot A and the west 4.86 feet of Lot B,Block 65,City d Townsite of As and 105 E. The properties have both been listed on the"Inventory of Historic Sites and Structures"; y Pm APPROVED BY THE COMMISSION at its regular meeting on the 10th day of nvzota onTe or ruaLlunon and Hallam Street,the east 25.14 feet of Lot B and the west 8 feet of Lot C,Block 65,City and WHEREAS,all development in t ` Historic of Aspen be approved with the following conditions: October,2001. c Overlay District or development . involving a historic landmark must mat eet f I The HPC has granted the following variances:a.5 foot west side yard variance for all four Development Review Standards of the existing house,a 5 foot east side yard variance to build in the location of the n _------- ameln 26.72.010(0)of the Aspen Land Use Code in order for HPC to grant approval, existing shed,a 3.5 foot west sideyard variance for new construction(the linking t namely: element),a 5.5 foot combined sideyard setback variance,a 9.4 foot Combined Approved as to Form: front and rear yard setback variance,a 5 foot rear yard setback variance,and L Standard: The proposed development is compatible in general design,massing waiver of one parking space. and volume,scale and site plan with designated historic structures located on the 2. The HPC hereby grants the following variances for the shed on 105 E.Hallam parcel and with development on adjacent parcels when the subject site is in a`H;' Street,in the event That the board agrees that it must be reeonsWCted due to Historic Overlay District de is adjacent to an Historic Landmark.For historic conditions that cannot be forseen at this time:a rear yard setback variance of 5 feet David Hoeter,Assistant ity Attorney SD 6/30/14 HPC CONCEPT.REV. landmarks where proposed development would stance into front yard,side yard and and a west sideyard setback variance of S feet to allow it to be rebuilt in its current rear yard setbacks,extend into the minimum distance between buildings on the lot, location. exceed the allowed floor area by up to five hundred(500)square feet,or exceed the 3. Information on all venting locations and meter locations shalt be provided for Approved as to content: PROJECT NO 1411 allowed site Covered by up to five(5)percent,HPC may grant necessary variances HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION -------------------- review and approval by staff and monitor when the information is available. : after making a finding that such variation is more compatible in character with the 4. Submit a demolition plan,as part of the building permit plan set,indicating DRAWN BY KPT -- - historic landmark and the neighborhood than would be development in accord with exactly what areas of the shed are to be removed. dimensional requirements. In no event shall variations pursuant to this Section 5. No elements are to be added to the historic house that did not previously exist. No COPYRIGHT FORUM PHI,LLC exceed thou variation allowed under Section 26.520.040(Bx2), for detached existing exterior materials other than what has been specifically approved herein Stirs Reid,Chair accessory dwelling units,and may be removed without the approval of staff and monitor. 2. Standard: The proposed development reflects and is consistent with the 6. HPC staff and monitor must approve the type and location of all exterior lighting ATTEST: fixtures. character of the neighborhood ofthe parcel proposed for development. Z There shall be no deviations from the exterior elevations as approved without first 3. Standard: The ro sad develo being reviewed and approved by HPC staff and monitor.. p po pment enhances or does not detract from the 8. The applicant shall be required to provide the contractor with copies of the HPC historic significance of designated historic structures located on the parcel resolution applicable to this project The contractor must submit a letter Kathy Strickland,Chief Deputy Clerk proposed for development or on adjacent parcels. addressed to HPC staff as par of the building permit application indicating that all 461105 SHEET TITLE 46,15 IIINUI IUI�IINI�INon,o,NnII�hI �Naa4G2 D�00us r3N IHINIIUIIIIhIIIIIIIIU11NUllIIII lllllfl11 z13 X00 s tan Ilgllq�iplrlllNliIIIIIIIitllee•%aees s a Resolution No.45 of 2001 Resolution No.45 of 2001 Resolution No.45 of 2001 LAND USE APPROVALS 1 -w I CITY MONUMENT SW CORNER BLOCK 54 0 10 20 HORIZONTAL CONTROL LEGEND AND NOTES BEARINGS BASED ON FOUND CITY MONUMENTS AS SHOWN N 14°50 99'E O SET SURVEY MONUMENT '25947' I, SURVEY CONTROL UTILITY BOX —o FENCE WOOD OR METAL 1 TI'LE INFORMATION FURN I5HED By P I-KIN COUNTY TITLE, INCI CASE N0. PCT 24051W DATED. MAY 51 2014 ZONED. 'R-6, H' SETBACKS AS PER RESOULTI 01-5 SERIES OF 2001. 1, NO LONGER IN EFFECT AS PER COA PLANNING. Eq s�4H eLCgM STRFF'�. RTORWGE$ISRSHOOWN PATIO, SPA, CONC. AND FENCES ENCROACH NTO u C� III O S-RFEf LIGHT `-`T` I 5 f h r 5= RfG" BRICK llfl nT IC PERGOLA. O I PAT f I ; PATIO BRICK _ ,r !PATIO l ! \ m l CERT IF IrnTION I HECH � E F JOHN HOWOATH HERE 6Y CE FY TO PARK C AND PITIIN COUNTY TITLE, INC ANC/OR ! / /„ A$8'GNS THA' THIS IS AN IMPROVEMEN' SJRVEY PLAT' AS DEFINED BY C.R 76-51-'.02f9 1 L P AND THA' IT IS A MONUMENT_D AND SJRVEY SHOWING THE LOCATION OF ALL STRUCTURES, IIS'BLE JTI.ITIES, FENCES HEDGES OR WALES SITUATED ON tHE DESCRIBED PgRCEL ANU )� S" 1 + WI THI N�NIV F nL_BbJ ROAR IE$0= SJCH PAPCE'_ ANY CONFLICT-NG BOUNDARY E'V'D'cNCI- OR YISIBI NTS, AN A"_ EASEMENTS, UNDERGROUND UT'.LIi:ES, AND TUNNELS B`x DESCRI � LINTY TE, INC., COMMITMENT FOR 'ITLE INSURANCE. Jd y` ro - tic - DATED �NE�R' , `25947 w T B Y Lc'NG 2eC3c W -- f' IMPROVEMENT SURVEY AGI Fy c .c oP CN4/ 6 LO' A AND THE WES'ERL- 9 e6 FEE'0"r LO' e BLOCK 65, C'"'AND'OWNS' OF ASPEN CON-A N NG 3,x86 SO F' / PREgR ED BY ASPEN SORVEY ENGINEERS INC SOJ?H GA'.ENA ST El N LICE:n NO TO COLORADO LAW TO COR 1 L,'Y MONUMENT SW CTIOR BA"" NY LO-0 I BANYrE ie CORNER BLOCK 65 A TL#YW S f3COVER- T."`LA. IEVE .. A"nc KSR N CJ's RA' Ifil'.1. �1p NE/�!% 1303) 925-36'6 IBEµ.1®FPROn 1µ11E DATE OFITNEIRR1 F3T.ANTinEMESR�NEURSE^�Ii CEBTIRIGTI ON IS O'D D MITI T L !:nlE JOB SMVEVOB �, 4i 14 25 08 715 West Main Street,Suite 204 Aspen,Colorado 81611 P:970.279.4157 F:888.770.5585 Zoning Allowance&Project Summary 101 EHallam St 101 E HALLAM HALLAM LLC Remode0Add01on 101 E Hallam St Aspen,Colorado 81611 ad oe - Front 10 10 _ _ 10 _ 28.710.040.D.2. Rear-Princi al 10 10 _ _ 10 .710.040.D.3. (Setback Variance Res (Seback Variance Rea Rear-Accessory No.21988) 6 No.21998) 8.710.040.D.3. Side 6 5 .710.040.D.4. Distance between BuAtll 5 5 5 :710.040.D.8. Comer Lot yes Ifes Net Leasable/Comm So FT N/A IWA /A openSpace% WA Not Required for R-0 WA .710.D40.D.10. CONSULTANTS Not Required for R-e SURVEYOR Site C N/A x6,000 cq R WA .710.040.D.7. On-88e Paridn 1 2 1 Aspen Survey Engineers 210 S Galena Street Aspen,Colorado 81611 (970)925-3816 Land 362,500 Pitldn Cou Assessor aspensurveyors®gmeil.com rovemmts 8340,000 CW" A56e86or CIVIL Total 2,702,500 PBkM Coun Assessor TBD Net Lot Area MECHANICAL TBD 101 E Haltom St Min.Gross Lot Area rR-a ,000 Sq Ft;3,000 Sq Ft for Historic Landmark Pro perties .710.040.D.1 STRUCTURAL Min.Net Lot Area(per R-0) 4,500 Ft:3,000 Ft for Historic Landmark Propoertles .710.040.D.2 TBD Lot Size Per Survey_ Reductions for area with slopes 0%-20%(100%of parcel area to be My included in Net LM Area) WA 575.020-1 Reductions for=slopes slopes 20%.30%(50%of parcel area to be CONTRACTOR included in Net Lot Area WA _ _ Reductions for area with slopes greater than 30%(0%of parcel area to be 575020-1 TBD included In Net Lot Area) .576.020-1 ��Net Lot Ft 782014 DATE DF PUSUGTM Allowable Floor Area 101 E Hallam St blaabb FtoerAna --- - - - Raforona Per R-6 -- - - - 6.710.060 _ 2,538.08 square feet(2,400 square feet of 000r Brea,plus 2B square feet of Boor area for each additional 100 square feet in SD 8130111 HPC CONCEPT.REV. Net Lot Aree,up to a maximum of 3,240 s uare feet) Un ue als ea PROJECT NO: 1411 DRAWN BY: KPT arieaaea eferenee COPYRIGHT FORUM PHI,LLC nee Gars a Exe son First 250 s 8 exam t;Next 250 s 8 to exclude 50%of area;An _ 28.575 face .7 2-005 15%of gross=380.4 exempt 6.575.020.0.5 Z- Deck Exemption Front Porch Exempt=52.50 s uare feet 005 8 Z-006 Area Su - - Oros FbirArea F Oraea k Floor Area(Sq Fits; Lower Leval 1,747,50 53.15 -9004 _ Garage(locatetl on Mein Levep 287.75 23.88 -005 SHEET TITLE Main Level 1,184.75 1,184.75 1,17800 1,178.00 -005 Common Building 108.00 108.00 108.00 108.00 -005 Deck Aroe .25 963 ,137. 0.00 -005 8 Z-0OB _O O/t U er Level 883.75 98375 1,137.25 1,137.25 Z-006 I ZONING SUMMARY Residential Design Standards Unique Approvals&Variances Residential Design Standards Compliance See Land Use Approvals for complete list of approved resolutions and/or admin approvals. 101 E Hallam Street _ RN Section —- Coda Daow"ml CompiwAm Dan alptlen Rebrumwd Z Shsele , A.Sit.Design 1.Building ordemtation. The front facades of all principal structures shall be parallel to the street.On comer lots,both This lot is a comer lot and the existing street facing facades are parallel to the intersecting Survey street-facing facades must be parallel to the intersecting streets.On curvilinear streets,the streets. front facade of all structures shall be parallel to the tangent of the midpoint of the arc of the street.Parcels as outlined in Subsection 28.410.010.B.4 shall be exempt from this requirement.One(1)element,such as a bay window or dormer,placed at a front comer of the building may be on a diagonal from the street if cleaired. 2.Sugd4o gains. On parcels or lots of less than fifteen thousand(15,000)square feet,at least sixty percent This lot is a comer kR and more than W%of the facade is within 5 of the minimum Setback Z-003 715 West Main Street,Suite 204 (60%)of the from facade shall be within five(5)feet of the minimum front yard setback line Aspen,Colorado 81611 On comer sites,this standard shall be met on the frontage with the longest block length. P:970.279.4157 F:888.770.5585 Porches may be used to meet the sixty percent(60%)standard. 3.Fence. Fences,hedgerows and planter boxes shall not be mom than fgrty4wo(42)inches high, The existing 3 R wrought4ron fence is existing to remain. Z-083 restated from nature/grade,in all areas forward of the Nord facade of the house.Man-made barns are prohibited in the front yard Setback. 101 E HALLAM B.Building Form 1.Secondary mass. All new single-family and duplex structures shall locate at least ten percent(10%)ofthelr total This lot contains an existing historic structure to remain that predates the RDS. Survey HALLAM LLC square footage above grace In a mass which is completely detached from the principal building or linked to 0 by a subordinate linking element.This standard shall only apply to 101 E Hallam St Parcels within the Aspen infill area pursuant to Subsection 26.410.010.8.2.Accessory Aspen,Colorado 81611 buildings such as garages,sheds and accessory dwelling units are examples of appropriate uses for the secondary mass.A subordinate linking element for the purposes of linking a primary and secondary mass shall be at least ten(10)feet in length,not more than ten(10) feet in width,and with a plate height of not more than nine(9)feet.Accessible outdoor space over the linking element(e g.a deck)is permitted but may not be covered or enclosed.Any railing for an accessible outdoor space over a linking element must be the minimum reasonably necessary to provide adequate safety and building code compliance and the telling must be 50%or more transparent. C.Panting.Garages and 1.For all residarMd uses a)Parking,garages and carports shall be accessed from an ahoy or private road. The proposed garage is accessed from the ahoy. Z-003 Carports that have access ft..an _ alley or private road,the b)If the garage doom are visible from a street or alley,than they shall be single-stall doors or The proposed garage door is a single stall door. Z-202 following standards shall double-stall doors designed to appear like singie-stall doom. apply: C)If the garage doom are not visible from a sheet or alley,the garage doors may be either The proposed garage door is a single stag floor. Z-202 single-stall or normal double-stall garage doors. 2.For all midantl.1 uses a)On the street facing Iscade(s),the width of the living arcs on the first floor shall be at least The garage Is accessed via an alley therefore this section does not apply. Z-003 that have access only from five(5)feet greater than the width of the garage or carport a public street,the following standards shall b)The front facade of the garage rage or the front-most supporting column of a carport shall be set The garage is accessed via an alley therefore this section does rot apply. 2-003 CONSULTANTS be apply back at least ten(10)feet fartherfrom the street than the from-most wall of the house. SURVEYOR c On lots of at least fifteen thousand 15,000 Aspen Survey Engineers,Inc. ( )square feet M c old the garage or try am they The garage is accessed via an alley therefore this section does not apply Z-003 210 S Galena Street as forward la the front facade e-Ma house only tithe gaups doors or carport entry are Aspen,Colorado 81611 perpendicular to the street(side-loaded). (970)9253818 d)When the floor of a garage or carport is above or below the street level,the driveway out The garage is accessed via an alley therefore this section does not apply. Z-003 aspensurveyors@gmail.com within the front yard setback shall not exceed two(2)feet in depth,measured from natural grade. CIVIL TBD e)The vehicular entrance width of a garage or carport shall not be greater Men fw'onty-four The garage Is accessed vie an ahoy therefore this section does not apply. Z-003 (24)feet. f)If the garage doom are visible from a public sheet or alley,Men they shah be single-stag The garage is accessed via an ahoy therefore this section does not apply. Z-003 doors or double-stall doors designed to appear like single-stall doom, MECHANICAL D.Building Elements 1.Strut oriented entrance All smgle4amily homes and duplexes,except as outlined in Subsection 26.410.010.B.4 shall The existing historic house has a streetarierrted entrance and a sheet facing principal window 2-201 TBD .4 hak dgel window, have a streetoriented entrance and a street facing principal window.Mufti-family units shall to remain. have at least one(1)streetonented entrance for every four(4)units and front units must have a street facing a principal window.On corner lots,entries and principal windows should face whichever street has a greater block length.This standard shall be satisfied d all of the following conditions are met. a)The entry door shall face the street and be no more than ten(10)feet back from the hunt- The existing entry door to remain is no more than ten(10)feet back from the front moat wag of Z-102 STRUCTURAL most wall of the building.Entry doors shah not be taller than eight(8)fast the building and is not teller then eight(8)feet TBD b)A covered entry porch of fifty(50)or mom square feet,with a minimum depth of slot(6) The existing historic hod porch Is greater than 50 square feet with a minimum depth of 6 feet. Z-003 8 Z-102 feet,shall be part of the front facade.Entry porches and canopies shall not be more than one (1)story in height c)A shell-facing principal window requires that a significant window or group of windows face The existing street-facing facades contain significant groups of windows. Z-201 8 Z-202 CONTRACTOR Strast TBD 2.First a"aisnesm. All residential buildings shall have a first story street-facing element the width of which This lot contains an existing hidodc structure to remain that predates the RDS. 2.003 comprises at least twenty percent(20%)of the building's overall width and the depth of which is at least slot(6)feet from the wall the first story element is projecting from Assuming that the first story element includes interior living space,the height of the first story element shall not exceed ten(10)feet as measured to the plate height.A first story element may be a porch or living space.Accessible space(whether ft Is a deck,porch or enclosed area)shall not be 7R21114 ds1E OF PUBLICATION showed over the first story element however,accessible space over the remaining first story elements on the front flgade shall not be precluded. 3.Villainess. a)Street-facing windows shall not span through the area where a second floor level would The existing and proposed street-facing windows do not span through nine(9)and twelve(12) Z-201 6 Z-202 typically exist,which is between nine(9)and twelve feet(12)above the finished first floor.For feet above the finished first floor. interior staircases,this measurement will be made from the first landing if one exists.A transom window above the main entry is exempt from this standard. b)No more than one(1)nonorthogonal window shall be allowed on each facade of the The existing historic contains one nonorthogonaf windows to remain.All proposed windows Z-201 8 Z-202 building.A single non-orthogonal window in a gable end may be divided with mullions and still are orthogonal. be considered one(1)non-orthogonal window.The requirement shall only apply to Subsection 28.410.010.8.2. SD 6/30114 HPC CONCEPT.REV. 4.Ught"Its. All areaways,Ilghlwells andfor stairwells on the stree-facing tacadels)of a building shall be The proposed lightwells are recessed behind tiro front-most wall of the building and are not Z-003 entirety recessed behind the front-most wall of the bugtling located on the street-facing facade. E.Context 1.MslNlele. a)The quality of the exterior materials and details and their application shall be consistent on The quality of the exterior materials and their application is consistent on all sides of the Z-201 8 Z-202 PROJECT NO: 1411 all sides of the building. building. DRANK BY: KPT b)Materials shall be used in ways that are true to their characteristics.For instance stucco. The use of materials is true to their characteristics.Proposed materials will be approved at Z-201 8 Z-202 which is a light or non-bearing material,shall not be used below a heavy material,such as HPC Final Review. COPYRIGHT FORUM PHI,LLC stone. c)Highly reflective surfaces shall not be used as exterior m rteriale. There are no proposed highly reflective materials.Proposed materials will be approved at Z-201 8 Z-202 HPC Final Review. 2.Inflection. The following Standard must be met for parcels which are sic thousand(6,000)square feet or This parcel 19 loss than six thousand(6,000)square fast tlrorefore this section does not apply. Survey over and as outlined M Subsection 26.410.010.13 2: a)It a oneatory building exists directly adjacent to the Subject site,then the new construction This parcel is less than slot thousand(8,000)square feet therefore this Section time not apply. Survey most step down to one-story in height along their common lot fine.If Mere are one-story buildings on both sides of the subject site,the applicant may choose the side toward which to Inflect. SHEET TITLE A one-sory building Shall be defined as follows:A one spry building shall men a structure or This parcel k lass than sic thousand(6,000)square fast therefore this sedan does not apply. Survey portion of a structure,where there is only one(1)floor of fully usable living ypao,in least a story ale feet wide across the street frontage.This standard shall be O O met by providing a one story element which is also at least twelve(12)feet wide across Me _ L street frontage and one(1)story tall as far back along the common lot line as the adjacent building is one(1)story. RDS COMPLIANCE E HALLAM STREET E HALLAM STREET 715 West Main Street,Suite 204 Aspen,Colorado 81611 P:970.2794157 F:866.770.5585 101 E HALLAM HALLAM LLC 101 E Hallam St ----- Aspen,Colorado 81611 1 1 — 1 1 §0 1 6S ---- -----5-- -I I r---- -------- 1 I — -5-FRONTYARDSET— I I I I 1 PERL003R0.5A2 I SIDE VAR J� SIDE YAR 5 I SIDE YAR I ISIDE YAR I I LINE OF I I LINE OF EXTERIOR WALL EXTERIOR WALL I CONSULTANTS ? -A v IZ x Iw SURVEYOR EXISIfING 3FT WROUGHT-IRON ' I v z Aspen Survey Engineers,Inc. 210 S Galena Street FEN E TO REMAIN N I EXISTING FENCE w Aspen,Colorado 81611 PER -003 RDS A.3. I I ❑ u. 1 w TO REMAIN I ❑ y w (970)925-3816 i O I g I p aspensurveyors(Hgmail.com la z la CIVIL ,+,I, I Lu ' TBD g I I MECHANICAL TBD Z j Z I I NORTH OF LINE IS I I 1 1 EXISTING TO REMAIN ' SEE ELEVATIONS I NORTH OF LINE IS I I I Z-201 8 Z-202 I I HISTORIC TO REMAIN�•— —I — — — — ' STRUCTURAL SEE ELEVATIONS 1 - I I I { TSD SHEETS Z-201 8 Z-202 I I EGRESS LIGHTWELL ' I PER Z-003 RDS 0.4 t +�/ I i TREE TO BE REMOVED I I FOR EGRESS LIGHTWELL 0 I NI CONTRACTOR I EXISTING FENCE TO REMAIN I i i ; I� i TBD i PER Z-003 RDS A.3. I I I L---�---I IJ I � _ EGRESS LIGHTWELL — I PER Z-003 RDS DA j I --- I 7an014 DATE OF PaegGTION I I 1 I 1 Y 1. — ----------- ' I '------- --- -----J I r I GE a I ESS r - Z-003 1 °� -0.1. I I >• I SD 8130/14 HPC CONCEPT.REV. PROJECT NO: 141 ALLEY ALLEY _-------J - - - 1 DRAWN BY: KPT COPYRIGHT FORUM PHI,LLC SHEET TITLE 1 PROPOSED SITE PLAN 1/8" = 1'-0" iX EXISTING SITE PLAN 1/8" = 1'-0" Z-003 N SITE PLAN 1 4 8 16 SUBGRADE CALC LEGEND PROPERTY LINE ' i------------------------------------------- 1 75 o+ SUBGRADE WALLAREA 202.755 Q fl 183.00 sq ft I I ■ EXPOSED WALLAREA ' O O O Q Q i I I I I I I 21'4" 1. 2. 3 , SETI3ACN LINE I I I 715 West Main Street,Suite 204 Y. 9'-4" 4'1" 12'-3s'^" 4'-0' 24'-3111 i r--------------r-r----------r-�I I Aspen,Colorado 81611 P:970.279.4157 F:866.770.5585 , 28.00 sq it I 225.25 5q n , I I I 101 E HALLAM 21'4 HALL.AM LLC 512.25 sq n — — I 101 E Hallam St —� —� Aspen,Colorado 81611 53'-11"- 23'.8 t I l 4 I I I I I � I I , 703 00 sq n I I I 2. I 13 I 1 - t'8' CONSULTANTS FAR PLAN LEGEND SURVEYOR . I , Aspen Survey Engineers,Inc. 210 S Galena Street COUNTABLE FLOOR AREA i ; I I I Aspen,Colorado 81611 ' (970)925-3818 ❑ ( I i aspensurveyorsagmail.com EXEMPT FRONT PORCH i I I I CIVIL ❑ L�-�-- 1----------F-F-------� -4 —1— TBO EXEMPT DECK Existing Floor Area Calculations I I I I I m 101 E Hallam St 50%EXEMPT-GARAGE ' 1 ' MECHANICAL Lower Level Gro rs Floor Area Ft 0 � Existing Lower Level Floor Area Calculations _ 1 TBD _ 100%EXEMPT-GARAGE � (Sq ) 00 ro Low_er Level_Countable Floor Area(Sq Ft) 0.00 C. I Lower Level Floor Area 5 Ft 000 , • ' Total Existing Floor Area Calculations _. I I I ' STRUCTURAL _ ( Q 1_._ I i 1.747.50 sq 8 , i ; I TBD Main Level Floor Area(Sq Ft) _ 129275 q Upper Level Floor Area(Sq Ft) DecklPorch Floor Area(Sq Ft) _ - 0.00 Total Existing Floor Areas(8q Ft) 4_ I CONTRACTOR I , TBD I I II I Proposed Floor Area Calculadions 101 E Hallam St i I ' 7r2M14 DATE01irt1eLIGTION I ' r I I I I I Proposed LGWar 1.a WI FJ oNd wall Calculations r I I I Total Wall Area(Sq FII Expose -- i--—-—-—-—- —-—-—-— r 1 _ _ 202.75 0.00 a 2 183.00 0.00 I I I I 3 14.75 0.00 r 4 _ _ 512.25 56.00 S 225.50 0.00 8 70300 000 81.114 HPC CONCEPT.REV. _.. .. -_ Overall Total Well Anse 'r-t) Exposed Wall Area(Sq Ft) I , i /ot Exposed Wall(Sq Ft)(Exposed/Total) 3.04% PROJECT NO'. 1411 -. DRAWN BY: KPT Proposed Lower Level Floor Area Calculations COPYRIGHT FORUM PHI,LLC La—Level Gross Floor Area(Sq Ft) __ _ _ 1,747.50 (Lower Level Countable Floor Area(Sq Ft) 53.16 1,747.5x3.0496' Total Proposed Floor Arg CaloYlations I,LOVrer Level Floor Area(Sq Ft) _ 53.15 I ' - MeinLevelFbwArea(SgFt) _ 1307.68 ----------- iUpper Level Floor Area(Sq Ft)_ _ _ _ 1137.25 DeclJPOrcn Floor Area(sg Ft) a.00 SHEET TITLE PROPOSED LOWER LEVEL 3/16'= T-O" NO EXISTING LOWER LEVEL Z-004 FLOOR AREA 1 4 6 16 0) CALCULATIONS PROPERTY LINE PROPERTY LINE TT TT T TIT TT I I SETBACK LINE I I I SET&4CR LINE I I I 715 West Main Street,Suite 204 1 ' ,r--------------r------------,--� , Aspen,Colorado 81611 I r--------------r—r----------r--. 970.279.4157 F:888.770.5585 II I I 1 1 I I II I 1 I 1 I I I I I 1 IIEXEMPTFRONTPORCH , II EXEMPT FRONT PORCH PER RDS226.575.020.D.5 I I I PER RDS 26.575.020.D.5 I •I 101 E HALLAM HALLAM LLC 101 E Hallam St FAR PLAN LEGEND - I - —� Aspen.Colorado 81611 I I r I 1 I ■ COUNTABLE FLOOR AREA ; I ❑ EXEMPT FRONT PORCH ^ 1 1 ❑ EXEMPT DECK I I I I I LL�J 1 ❑ 50%EXEMPT-GARAGE I I I 1 1 ❑ 100%EXEMPT-GARAGE CONSULTANTS SURVEYOR Aspen Survey Engineers,Inc. Existing loor Area Calculations { V —i ((4 I 21S Galena street 101 E Hallam St Aspen,)925-3816 81611 II 1 l* rr { i aspensurveyors(Dgmail.com I I CIVIL ,"ng Main Leval Floor Area Cak:ulatio Main Level Gross Floor Area(Sq Ft) 1184.75 -— TBD Common Building Gross Floor Area(So Ft) 108.00 EXEMPT FRONT V Main L-1 Countablo or Flo Atp PORCH PER RD� EXEMPT FRONT PORCH I I I I - -- 28.575.020.0.5 , ., I, I PER RDS 28.575.020.0.5 r % I 1 T,40' it Existing Dock/Porch Floor Area Calculations _ I j I I I it ' MECHANICAL Fxampt per RDS , ' I TBD Front Porch Gross Floor Area(Sq Ft) 1&5.00 .575.020.D.5 I I r I 1 I Deck Gross Floor Area(Sq Ft)(Main 8 Upper Leveb 351.25 15%of gross=380.4 exampll diLbkorch Countable Floor Area(Sq Ft) ' 0.00 Total Existing Floor Area crmdrtar. _ I I I I I I`—�—— STRUCTURAL - g ' I I I r) I I I TBD Lower Level Floor Area(Sq Ft) 0.00 1 I I ; R I 1 I ,178.00 s q it 184.75 sq I Maln Letts Floor Area(Sq Ft) 1292.75 Upper Level Floor Area( Ft) 803.75 Deck/Porch Floor Area eq Ft) 0.00 Flo F 11 I II I I I I CONTRACTOR Total w - Q - I I , I � 1 , TBD it __q:) I I 50%EXEMPT PER 47.75 sgft % i 1 I i ii L i 28.575 20.0.7 ' I I I I ' I I l I I P RUCATION Proposed Floor Area Calculations 7122014 DA11 OF I ) 101 E Hallam St I I 190.00 sq it I I I I 11 I I EXISTING DECK I I I I I I I I TO BE REMOVED I \ - U"T-'�Y is ,Mein Level Grog Floor Area(Sq R) 1176.00 , 1 —_—_—_—_—_ COmrrron Buibh Grow Floor Area S Ft 108.00 100%gXEMPT PERT j 250.00 sq ft 28.575,020.D.7 I I I I I I I I M:iin Lwsl Co011tabie Flour Area(Sq Ft) _ +.-.. Proposed Garage Floor A ea Calculations I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I �ara6�rsross Fmor Area Isq F1; 117.75 _ I I I ��/ I I, I I I I I SD BI30It4 HPC CONCEPT.REV. Ga:aga Com,rahie Floor A,ea Isq Fr. 23 88 .757.020.0.7 I I I I II I I I I I I ll Garage Countable Floor Area(Sq Ft) ' 'I I // \\ ' I' t I l' PROJECT NO: 1411 _ ) / - --- -- I - II - - I----- A �e A A -�a--- ���-�-._—_— � DRAWN BY: ItP'T Proposed -- __-DeeklPw_c._h_Floor Area Caculatios I I I 1 �ront _ mpt par RDS ' I I 108 Porch Groan Floor Area(Sq Fn ____ 185.00 8.57b.020.D.6 I I ' II COPYRIGHT FORUM PHI,LLC Deck Gross Floor Area(Sq Ft)(Ma,n S Upper Lewis)- 26600 115%of rose=380.4 W I 1005 it I I 108100 sq R Deck/Porch Countable Floor Area(Sq Ft) 0._00_ I I I I I I � Total Proposed Floor Area Calculations I I 1 I I Lower Level Flool Area(Sq Ft 53.15 Ma,n Level Floor Area(Sq Ft 1307.88 _—__—__—_j—I__—__ Upper Level Flow Area( Fl 1137.25 I II II 1 ' Deck/Porch Floor Area(Sq Fry 0.00 (1,r 1Il (�I SHEET TITLE Total Proposed Floor Area b V V V bs bU i PROPOSED MAIN LEVEL FAR 3116'= 1'-0" EXISTING MAIN LEVEL FAR 3116"= 1'-0" Z-005 N FLOOR AREA 1 4 8 16 CALCULATIONS PROPERTYLINE-- I qT qT T ITT TT I I I II I II I SETBACK LINE I SETI3ACW LINE I I I 715 West Main Street,Suite 2D4 I r----------- --r— ----------T-1 I Ir---'---'---r,---------I- I Aspen,Colorado 81811 I I I I I I I I P:970.279.4157 F:886.770.5585 I I I I; I II I 101 E HALLAM HALLAM LLC 101 E Hallam St Aspen,Colorado 81611 r ' I I AREA EXEMPT'PER I I I I I AREA EXEMPT PER 26.575.050.D.3 FLOOR , r 26.575.050.D.3 FLOOR ' I I AREA c30" AREA c30' � � I FAR PLAN LEGEND I ■ COUNTABLE FLOOR AREA / � - I ET I EXEMPT FRONT PORCH I _ I I l I I I I I ❑ EXEMPT DECK I j ---------L— I CONSULTANTS SURVEYOR 50%EXEMPT-GARAGE I Aspen Survey Engineers,Inc. 210 S Galena Street ` � III Aspen Colorado 81611 ------- I 970 9253818 100%EXEMPT aspensurveyors@gmai l.com El 963.76 -� �- I I CIVD IL OL �i - F- - - �: ------ �I--� - -h - -� TB AREA EXEMPT PER Existing Floor Area Calculations 1 1 1137.25 sgit 1 26.575.050.D.3 FLOOR AREA EXEMPT PER AREA c30" 1101 E Hallam St j 55775.00.D.3 FLOOR j I I I l _ 1. MECHANICAL AREA- TBD on- _ - Upper LavelGross Floor Area Ft 963.75 ' U lsval CounbWe.. ..963.75 �- ; ------\` -- --- JI---�-� �---IT -------I I--<�—-- �---�-� I � I II , STRUCTURAL iExlaB Deak/PwaO F_ I I I 11 I I TBD mtrRD6 Front Porch GroaaFlowArea Sq Ft I - D.5 r Deck Gross Floor Area(Sq Ft) 35125 15%of Deckl ras=360.4 Porch CourrtabM Flow I — 1 I I ; ' CONTRACTOR _ I I -. ____-_ q I TBD I I. 161.25 s ft 'Total GziaBnp F � _a; c ' J —_— _—_ ' c c I J—_—_ Lower Level Floor Ares(Sq Ft) 0.00 r r—_—_—_—�. i —4 _ _i -—� iMein Level Floer Area(Sq Ft) _ 1292.78 .Upper Level Floor Area(Sq Ft) 963.76 i I I I ' I I ` ' I 7n 014 DATE OF MBIJC TtON '.DBCWPOrch Floor Area S Ft _ ' __ .. (G_.1 0.00 I I I IToW Exbting Flow Am(Sq FU C-AL I 0� �� - - j --I;- - - - - �I - - Proposed Floor Area Calculations I i II j I I I II 101E Hallam St I i 288.00 sq R SD 8130/14 HPC CONCEPT.REV. UD w Iaysl t4rco Floor Ft 1137.2b I I i I I I I I I ^ II I I O� I II _ I I I ' Q O.=r DRAWN BY' KPT Lxernpt par RDS I I I I I I T � I I I I I T �FroIrt Porch Floor Area(Sq Ft) 165.00 28.576.020.0.6 I ' COPYRIGHT FORUM PHI,LLC Deck Floor Area Sq Ft) 26600 15%of gross=380 4 exempt Deck/Porch Countable Floor Area(Sq Ft) 0.00 1 , I Total Proposed Floor Area 4l .it[bne Lower Level Floor Area(Sq Ft) _ _ 53.15 _-__�-----------+_�-__-__-_�-I_____ ____�-----------4_I--------- �______ Main Leval Floor Area 8 Ft 1307.88 U er Level Floor Ares Ft 1137.25 Total Oroh Flow Ares(8q F')q- 0.00 Total Proposed Floor Area S F fv� Uy z�/� �g "JJ �'J SHEET TITLE PROPOSED UPPER LEVEL FAR 3/16"= 1'-0" (EXISTING UPPER LEVEL FAR 3/16"= l'-0" ` O O6 N FLOOR AREA 1 4 8 18 ® CALCULATIONS PROPERTY LINE I ' I I I SETBACK LINE I 715 West Main Street,Suite 204 Aspen,Colorado 81611 i r--------------r—r----------r—� P:970.279.4157 F:888.770.5585 II I 11 I I 1 1 101 E HALLAM I HALLAM LLC 11 I I I 101 E Hallam St Aspen,Colorado 81611 i I I I I I 1 1 I 1 i I � I I = 1 1 I � I , REC ROOM I I = I CONSULTANTS SURVEYOR Aspen Survey Engineers,Inc. I I 210 S Galena Street I Aspen,Colorado 81611 as70 Pe nsum ors�9 mail.com I I I I I Y I ^ I CIVIL - —-—-—-—-—-�h—-—-—-—t -—- -� TBD � I , 1 I I I I I tz-zaj7 MECHANICAL i I I I I Y TBD � l.l, --------- I---�--Q I i I I i STRUCTURAL I I TBD I 1 BEDROOM 1[3 i I I I CONTRACTOR I I TBD CLOSET 1 I 0 I I I I I I 1 ]Y W 4 DATE OF PUBU UON 1 I I I I I I------- i I I I � I 1 BEDROOM 1 1 1 II 11 l I I i I SHOWER CLOS I SO 8/30114 HPC CONCEPT.REV. I 1 BATH 1 I Q I I I I i PROJECT NO: 1411 �— DRAWN BY: KPT i COPYRIGHT FORUM PHI,LLC WALL LEGEND ' EXISTING WALL TO REMAIN i ❑ EXISTING WALL TO BE _—__�-----------44-------- �—I____ I RE-SIDED ❑ NEW WALL SHEET TITLE 1 2 3 Z�202 1 5 rJ J 1' WALL TO DEMO ! 101 L PROPOSED LOWER LEVEL 3/16"= -0" NO EXISTING LOWER LEVEL N FLOOR PLANS 1 4 8 16 ---- ---PROPERTYLINE—_ —--—--—---__--PROPERTY LINE_---- I1 1 3 �� I 5 I 3 3 1X � 3 I T TTY TT T T� TT SETBACll LINE I I I SETOACR LINE I I I 715 West Main Street,Suite 204 r--------------rT----------r—� � Aspen,Colorado 81611 II I I I I II I I I � I P:970.279.4157 F:866.770.5585 II I I I 1 II I I � I I I I I li I li I 101 E HALLAM I I HALLAM LLC 101 E Hallam St -�-' Aspen,en,Colorado 811 611 I I WING I I � CONSULTANTS I i SURVEYOR t I I I I I tV" `-- 6 i 210 S Galena Strreeeteers,Inc. PWDR I I 1 I I ` Aspen,Colorado 81611 1 I (970)925-3816 ` f j 1 I I aspensurveyorsagmail.com I I II I I I II I I(� CIVIL TBD I I I DIryING I I L I ' �/I I1 'I �� 1, I MECHANICAL �z-zoz� I j I I i �Z i I I I N �x, TBD II i I I it � II I I � I it I NORTH OF LINE IS I I j I I STRUCTURAL i I I I EXISTING TO REMAIN TBD II I I I SEE ELEVATIONS I I 'K Z-201&Z-202 I ITCHEN PANTRY I I 1 I CONTRACTOR TBD II i I I DEMO � rRl-..R-. I i OEMO I I M=14 DATEOFMBUCAMN ' I GI RAGE I 1 ' DEMO �\ I �r ----------�I �I I SD 6/30/14 HPC CONCEPT.REV. I PROJECT NO: 1411 DRANM BY: KPT I I I I I I I I I I COPYRIGHT FORUM PHI,LLC COMM1N I I I I COMM�N _— WALLLEGEND ' BUILDING ' BUILDING EXISTING WALLTO REMAIN I I I I II I I I I ❑ EXISTING WALL TO BE __—__—__—_ 4_�--------1—I__—_ I —__ II RE-SIDED II ❑ NEW WALL ,1, ,lam}, 2DZ 1 1 3X j 1 SHEET TITLE LJ WALL TO DEMO O^ PROPOSED MAIN LEVEL 3;I(i"= 1'-0" EXISTING MAIN LEVEL 3/16"= 1'-0" 1 I L N FLOOR PLANS 1 4 8 16 PROPERTY LINE PROPERTY LINE I o I I 4 oI oI -11 /�II I I I I T 3 zXt T SE11CJ 1 I I I j —_--SE TBA K LINE I I 715 West Main Street.Suite 204 Aspen,Colorado 81611 ------__---- 1 I P:970.2794157 F:866.770.5585 101 E HALLAM HALLAM LLC 101 E Hallam St I T I I Aspen,Colorado 81611 CLOSET i I II I I ' I I I BEDROOM 'I "r j SHOWER\ , I I II I Ilgr I � II CONSULTANTS SURVEYOR SHOWER -Aspen Survey Engineers,Inc. I i I —7r 1 t 210 S Galena Street Aspen,Colorado 81811 I ' (970)9253818 aspens umyors(mgnr il.wm I J I CIVIL TBID CLOSET j I II I I i jl =1 MASTER BATH I MECHANICAL TBD I NORTH OF LINE IS I I I Ir------ — STRUCTURAL CLOSET' I EXISTING TO REMAIN , II I TBD I , SEE ELEVATIONS 1 ' Z-201 8 Z•202 CONTRACTOR l i I I I I j ceMO I I TBD -- ----rr-------r -I, I I I - �AAB, R BEDROOM 1 E 0 P+ ' I i I I I � � j 712RD14 DAn0FPD9lICAn0N „ I I I I ROOF DECK SO 8130114 HPC CONCEPT.REV. I li I I I it j I I; I I I �I j PROJECT NO: 1411 DRAWN BY: KPT COPYRIGHT FORUM PHI,LLC WALL LEGEND I I I I I I I I I I I I I I EXISTING WALLTO REMAIN I , ❑ EXISTING WALL TO BE ------------ RE-SIDED ❑ NEW WALL ,l J� Z 3 2 ,1, 1� 3X SHEET TITLE L __j WALL TO DEMO VVV V V Z-1 0 3 PROPOSED UPPER LEVEL 3116"= 1'-0" EXISTING UPPER LEVEL 3/16"= 1'-0" N FLOOR PLANS 1 4 8 6 -----------_--PROPERTY LINE----_ - I QI QI Q T QI I I I I I Tyv Y7 I SET64CN LINE I I I I SEIIJACI LINE I 715 West Main Street, 204 I r--------------r,-----------+--� ' seen, o 16 Colorado 1 11 I I I 1 I P:970.279.4157 F:866.770.5585 I II I I I I I II I j I I EXISTING FLAT ROOF I I I iI j SLOPED FOR DRAINAGE I I I i I I I I i I I I I 101 E HALLAM HALLAM LLC 101 E Hallam St I I I I I I I —� Aspen,en,Colorado 811 611 I I ,15:,3 i i 1,5:13 I I I I j ,15:,2 11.5:13 I I I I 1j I I I Ij I I I � j 1212 11.5:12 I f I I j ,i12 115:,2 EXISTING ROOF I TO REMAIN I I I 'I I I Ij 12:13 I I � I� 13:,2 I I I I Ij I I I I Ij I I I I II I I j I �I I I lu,x I I ❑� �}I j I l I l; I I � I I I I II CONSULTANTS SURVEYOR 12.12 i i u:u - I Aspen Surrey Engineers,Inc. 210 S Galena Street I j 1 I I I I Aspen,Colorado 81611 970)925-3816 aspensurveyors(Mgmail.com II II CIVIL II �I I I TBD IL. I _ i—_—_—_—_—_�.�—_—_—_— _—-— _ _—_—_—_—_ F_---_—_— _—_-- _ I I I I II I I I I II I I I i j I 12:12 i i j I II:13 amt I I j ,z:u MECHANICAL II I I I II I I j l TBD I j I I I j NORTH OF LINE I I I I I I jj I i S DRUCTURAL I I I r II EXISTING TO REMAIN I 1 I I II I I I I SEE ELEVATIONS I I I I I ' Z-201 8 Z-202 I I I Ij jl I I I I I LINE OF I I III I I I III DPPERL. DEMO CONTRACTOR I U ' I L !I I ,znz I 1212 1I I TBD C L __ I I )--�-�I — ----I- NEW FLAT ROOF II I I I I I I II SLOPED FOR DRAINAGE CIE I II I DEMO I 1 1 I 3Ra014 DATEOFWBGTION I 1 II II I II L------L J I II I I 35:,3 I II I I II I I' � I II I I I III I U-r--I1 - ------I--"�-------I'-11 -- --0. ----------��— I II I I I ROOFDECKSLOPED II I FDR OMNADE I I NEW ROOF DECK SLOPED FOR DRAINAGE II r I I I II I II I I II I SD Bf30114 HPC CONCEPT.REV. I I j I I I I RDDF I j I I I j I i I TTO REORE MAIAN II I PROJECT NO: 1411 I I I * — T I I I I lI DRAWN BY: PT COPYRIGHT FORUM PHI,LLC -----_- ROOFLEGEND I I I ua2 i I I I I ,x:12 EXISTING ROOF TO REMAIN F-1 I I NEW METAL ROOF ❑ NEW ROOF DECK 'x SHEET TITLE 1 1 J Z 02 5 2 J 3 0 4 S LJ ROOF TO DEMO Z-1 04 PROPOSED ROOF PLAN 3/16"= 1'-0" EXISTING ROOF PLAN 3/16"= 1'-0" N ROOF PLAN 1 4 8 16 0 0 o Q •- I I IT I Q ITT o E SETTTHCELEVE@ PROPERTY LINE ' I I PROPERTY LINE@ EAST ELEV �_—_ — I — I— — — I — — — i — — — RIDGE ^• __—__—__—__i___—_ 25 SETBACEV LIMIT NORTH ELEV NE I I RIDGE NORTH ELEV West C I SETBACK LINE@ 1 SETBACK LINE@ SETBACK LINE@ EAST EIEV ---------------------------- _ H � _ _ _ tt I i15 West Main Slreet,Sulte 204 ' 25 HEIGHT LIMIT p nl orado 81611 866770 —_____ — —--—-- 25 FEET P.970.279 4157 F 866 770.5585 I SEE WEST ELEV 11 I 13. SHEET 2-202 FOR I SHEET Z-202 FOR 9. 10. HEIGHT HEIGHT 1/J POINT FROM I EAVE TO RIDGE — ti]POINT FROM 1z z 1/3 POINT FRCM I 13MWFROM 'T(� 1 i 5. 113 MINT FROM EAVE TO RIDGE EAVE TO RIDGE EAVE TO RIDGE EAVE TO RIDGE — 101 E HALLAM ' 113 POINT FROM II I 1 EAVE /n POINT FROM I I I I I I 3 - EAVE TO RIDGE ' 'I I I I 1 EAVE TO RIDGE ( ; 10 POINT FROOE HALLAM LLC I 113 POINT IDLE i EAVETORIDGE Hallam Aspen, RIDGE' TOP MOSTPoRTION I I I I I ' i OF STRUCTURE TOP MOST PORTION 117, y 1A POINT 14. I I OFSTRUCTURE FLAT RROOFLE SLOPED j `� t13 POINT FROM 161 z, FROM ROOF DECK SLOPED FLAT ROOF SLOPED A EAVE TO RIDGE EAvETO FOR DRAINAGE TOP MOST PORTION I p FOR DRAINAGE 1. RIDGE OFSTRUCTURE ® io Y 7' � � I I I I ❑ I � � f � f I I I I i I I I I I I I II I I 11 I CONSULTANTS SURVEYOR Aspen Survey Engineers,Inc. 210 S Galena Street Aspen,Colorado 81611 (970)9253816 aspensurveyorsagmail.cam CIVIL TBD MECHANICAL 2x EXISTING EAST ELEVATION 3116"= 1'-0" 1X EXISTING NORTH ELEVATION 3/16"= V-0" TBD �^ ^ ^ r STRUCTURAL Y Y LINE OF ADDITION Y Y Y Y Y ITT 1� I TBD 6 RENOVATION EXISTING CHIMNEY SETBACK LINE @ I PROJECTION TO REMAIN ,+I � SOUTH ELEV PROPERTY LINE@ I II I PROPOSED I I I PER 265T5.020.F.I.A. PROPERTY LINE 1 I I I 'I PROPERTY LINE@ EAST ELEV -—--—--—--—-NEEXT ION 6 REMAIN TO R3 HEIGHT LIMIT ' F NORTH ELEV NORTH ELEV EXTERIOR REMAIN Ir�'�T 25 FEET SETBACK LINE@ T -------- --_---------I-- RENOVATON 1---------I--------- 1 SETBACK LINE@ SETBACK LINE@ I I I II EAST ELEV —- --—- _—_1—i _—__—_ —__T EAST ELEV NORTH ELEV___ _T _I—__—__—__—__ __ — I CONTRACTOR II I I I I NRI�E I I I RIDGE 'I i1 FEEITCaHT LIMIT TBD 1R POINT FROM FOR ROOF DRAINAGE SLOPED SEE WEST ELEV PROPOSED EAVETO RIWE FOR DRAINAGE I I I SHEET Z-202 FOR - SHEET Z-202 FOR STANDINGSEAM ' 13, TOP MOST PORTION I 9' HEIGHT ` HEIGHT RGOF OF STRUCT IRE 'zL , I . 1/3 PCNNT FRdA 15 POINT FROM � th POINT FROM 12 EAVETORIDGE EAVETO RIDGE EAVE TO RIDGE .TAI ED TALE ' 113 POINT FROM TRQOt1 WTE OF PUBnGTR7N STAINED CEDAR TOP MOST PORTION I I EAVE IMPOINTFROM I I 1 I I I I 3' 11 EAVE MINT FROM EAVE TO RIDGE 113 POINT FROM OFSTRUCTURE I I la POINT FROM I _ I EAVE TO RIDGE EAVE TO RIDGE ROOF DECKSLOPED — — — — — — —. — — —.- - --- EXISTING CEDAR ,,, ❑ FOR GRAIN I I I I SHINGLE 1 1 it •_I. ' RIDGE I I I TOP MOST PORTION 1 1 SIe 1O POINT I I I OFSTRUCTURE FOR LAT ROOF SLOPED ' EA 1I3 POINT FROM 161 11 FROM `- FLAT ROOF SLOPED EAVE TO RIDGE EAVE TO �. FOR DRAINAGE TOP MOST PORTION , EXISTING CEDAR RIGGE I OFSTRUCTURE SHAKE I ❑�I I I I I I I I I EXISTING BRICK I - i EXISTING BRICK I FACADE I ` I FACADE SD 6/30/14 HPC CONCEPT.REV. I I ❑ W r I I Ell I I PROJECT NO: 1411 DRAWN BY: KPT I II i i I I I i t II I I I I I I ( II SING ST dJET ORIENTED 1 EXISTING S FRONT X I PORCH T�REMNN PRINCIPALWINDOWTOREMAM COPYRIGHT FORUM PHI,LLC I II PER Z-OWI RDSIb.1.B, PER ZiXl3 ROB 3B I 1 I I I I EX.TING.TR�1f 01UENTED I 1 e-S ENTRANCVOIIEMAIN PER Z-0R1 RDS .1 I 1I I I 11 I I I I I� I I 1� I I I I I I1-------------- -----------t-----------4fi-----------t---------------------------------- I ! ----------t— -------------�1 II I I 1 1 I I I I I I 1 1 1 SHEET TITLE Z-201 2 PROPOSED EAST ELEVATION 3116"= 1'-0" 1 PROPOSED NORTH ELEVATION 3/16"= V-D" ELEVATIONS HEIGHTS Q o 4 •- A SETMACKLINEQ I I I T Q T SETSACKLINEQ WEST ELEV I SOUTH ELEV PNOPERTY LINE PROPERTYLINEQ I I I I 1/3 POINT FROM I 'I PROPERTYLINEQ WEST ELEV SOUTH ELEV ' RI SOUTH ELEV SETBACK LINE Q I ' I I I __ __R�_ SETBACK LINE Q �I __ _ __ I I I I I 715 West Main Street,Suite 204 WEST ELEV T--—--—--_--—tf!POINT FROM EAVE TO RIDGE 1 ,i, -—---EAVE TO RIWE—_-—_-—-_—_ —__—_ —_ ] _— n FEET M'HT LIMB FORE SOUTH -_ ,—-_RIDC� I �R-8 HEIGHT LIMIT Aspen,Colorado 81611 I RIDGE I I I I n FEET P:970.279.4157 F:886.770.5585 I In MINT FROM 5. 61 10 POINT M I I 12. I SEE MST ELEV I I I 12. I I I ' I 1 ' In POINT FROM I I In POINT FROM I I' 11 13' 19 POINT FROM EAVETORIWE j EAVE TO RIME I �n EAVE TO RIWE +( I 113 POINT FROM EAVE TO RIME I I EAVETO RIDGE �.I Y, - ' 101 E HALLAM tO POINT FRgA R('u 1 '�rx 1f3 POINT FROM 113 POINT FRdA 6� �� EAVE TO RIME I EAVE TO RIDGE I ( EAVE TO RIME I HALLAM LLC 1 I I I I ( in POINT F MGM E r 1 '; 101 E Hallam St 1 — — — — - -T — T - - I c I I I 2 i i1 c I I I Aspen,Colorado 81611 TOP MOST PORTION I. EAVE TOO RIME 1 L I t t I RIDGE ' r t tl 1 OF STRUCTURE I 2.116 _ ' 1 t ! _-n�II ' ,x ,x I OFS OSTTTPORETION I Lo�1. I EAVE TO RIDGE FLAT ROOF SLOPED 1 I I I I TOP MOST PORTION In IRIT FROM 1/9 POINT FROM 15 16. 113 POINTFROM 11� FOR DRAINAGE OFSTRUCTURE FIAT ROOF SLOPED 0 - EAVE TO RIME EAVE TO RIDGE FOR DRAINAGE I �I 78. I I - - m m m I ce ? ZP t 1 1 1 1 i 1 / , El II I I 1 I I I I I I I I I I I I II CONSULTANTS SURVEYOR Aspen Survey Engineers,Inc. 210 S Galena Street Aspen,Colorado 61611 (970)925-3816 aspensurveyors fgmail.com CIVIL TBD MECHANICAL 4X EXISTING WEST ELEVATION 3116"= T-0" 3X EXISTING SOUTH ELEVATION 3116"= V-0" TBD 4 oI oI oI OI ITT Q STRUCTURAL I I I1 ADDITION I A SETBACK LINE Q 1 I I T SETBACK LINE Q TBD I 1 SHEOF ON WEST ELEV I SOUTH ELEV ' I PROPERTY LINE PROPERTY LINE I I 'I PROPERTYLINEQ PROPOSED WEST ELEV SOUTH ELEV ' I_SOUTH ELEV SETBACK LINE Q I I _ I -.TIN.TO I ADDIDTION S I I WEST ELEV T__ __ _—___________— l_.I_—__—__—________~ REMAIN 1 RENOVARON __—__—________________ ___—__ __ SETBACK LINE Q ___ _____—__— 1.- — ' CONTRACTOR nR I I 1 n FEET PouTN ELEV I' I I I I) n FEET TBD + R-0 HEIGHT LIMIT �-1 R-0.EIGHT LIMIT I 19 POINT INT FROM I 1 SEE WEST ELEV I I I I EAVETO RTO RIWE SHEETZ-XZ - ' PROPOSED PR OPOSED FOR HEIGHT I I STANDINGSEAM EA POINT FROM EA POINT FROM STANDING SEAM EXISTING CEDAR I EAVE TO RIWE I SAVE TO RIWE I ROOF USETO RI E RWP SHINGLE PROPOSED EAVE TO RIWE 6. PROPOSED HORQONTALI 3�. 1. 7. 6. I I I STAINEDCEDAR 782014 DATE OF PUBlGTaN!19POINTFROM _- � ]1x In POINT FROM STNNEDCEDAR 1*POINTFROM EAVE TRIWE EAVE TO RIWE I EAVETORIWE In POINT FROM EAVETO RIWE EXISTING CEDAR I 1q POINT FROM 2 SHAKE EAVE TO RIWE TOPMOST U RTION I I I I RIDGE 1Y,l POINT FROM OF STRUCTURE I EAVE TO RIWE I _- - PORTION FLAT ROOF SLOPED 1 - „ TOP MOST PORTION rx . I I 12 POINT FROM FOR DRAINAGE = = OF STRUCTURE FLAT ROOF SLOPED 1EAVEPOTIO RIDGE FOR DRAINAGE � 'I 16. 1x TO RIME 5 18. � EAVET - ,.- ! I ,. - - I EXISTING BRICK I I I I - SD 6130/14 HPC CONCEPT.REV. FACADE I N IN I II O II �@ I PROJECT NO 1411 DRAWN BY: KPT EXIBTINGSTREET ORIENTED I EXIBTINGS EET-0RIENTED I ( I I I I I I I) I I PRINCIPAL WINDOWS TO REMAIN 6$EN ETO REMAIN I I COPYRIGHT FORUM PHI,LLC i I PER2�3 RDS D.3.8. PER ZI= SD.1. i I' PER Z.RDSC.1. I ,I II I I I I I I I I II I I I II II ---------------------------------- ----------- ------------t-----------r-------------- C� ------------- - -----------r-� I SHEET TITLE Z-202 4 PROPOSED WEST ELEVATION 3/16"= V-0" 3 PROPOSED SOUTH ELEVATION 3116"= V-0" ELEVATIONS HEIGHTS _—--—--—-PROPERTYLINE—-- ---_—--—-PROPERTY LINE-- 1 4 TTY' Tq q TT x TT I I . . I SETI3ACN LINE I I I I I SETBACi LINE ' r--------------r-r----------r-� I 715 West Main Street,161 204 ----------- + 'r ---r�-_--__-----r--, , Aspen.Colorado 81811 1 I I I I I I I I I I I P:970.279.4157 F:888.770.5585 I EXISTING FLAT ROOF I SLOPED FOR DRAINAGE 101 E HALLAM HALLAM LLC —__-----_—_J--' 101 E Hallam St ,s- �..� 2. I I 11. 6--s-,„. T ls-�,.� 2. I I 1,. I —� Aspen,Colorado 81611 ; I nslz nsaz I 1 I I ms's- �� I I 1S'# 2. I I I I I I , 2. I I I I I -f- , I 1 I I , I 71 6' I I I 12.12 11.5:12 I I I -IST,NG ROOF I I 6. 1212 11.5:12 I I I 1 I TO REMAIN I p. .12 I I I ,2 I �I 12:12 I I I I 1-1,1,. 1- I , I EXISTIIIGCHIM EY TOREIINN I I I �{ I T I I El 10. l u.,z I , I T I I 10. luau I ' R:R 15. I 12:12 15. l l 1 1 I ' 11 I I I I I II I I I I CONSULTANTS SURVEYOR 12:12 16. 9. 1212 I 13:12 16. 9. I R 12 l , , I I I I Aspen Survey Engineers,Inc. I I I I ,e 210 S Galena Street R }��---- ---y,.�te-Y � I Aspen,Colorado 81811 1 ' (970)925-3816 II I I l I I aspensurveyolsfgmail.com I , CIVIL L_T h—_—_—_—_�F—_—_�_— TBD I I; 11 I I I I II A- :2 1= I T. 1z:,2 I , I I I I 2 .x II .a ,z,z I I I 2x 6.sY I 6sy MECHANICAL TBD I ' NORTH OF Llt � I I � I ' I I 1 I I ! I I II _i_ I I I III I ' STRUCTURAL I I I II EXISTING TO , I I 1 I I, I I TBD ' 1 , SEE ELEVATIC I I l I I I II I Z-201 6 Z-202 I III I I I I I III i , I I I I I LINEOF I I 12. I 13. II I�DEMO CONTRACTOR I I I I I I I I , l I UPPER LEVEL I I I li I j ,2,a I uaz i I j ; TBD , I 'I - c I II II I�l I I L.- M -- J T-�I I i I; -�_O 7+=v-;v9 ,gr-- -—-—-rSLOPED FOR DRANGE DEMO� 1224 DATE OF PUBLIG110N 13. 14. a-5'm 'II I It I I I ROOF DECK SLOPED I I I FOR DRANAGE I NEW ROOF DECK I I I I I I II I SLOPED FOR DRAINAGE II r I I II I II I I I II I I 14. I , SO 8130114 HPC CONCEPT.REV. I I I 66�� I I I II I I I I I I II I 1, EXISTING ROOF I I TO REMAM PROJECT 1411 A DRAWN BY:: KPT I 1 I 15 ,2,z I I I I 15 12.,2 COPYRIGHT FORUM PHI,LLC 1 , I I I I W-0 --�----, I I I ---- --�----; e-0 ----If------------+- -------- -I----- ----�----------- -I�--------- ----- t 1 � � I J �J, SHEET TITLE lJ PROPOSED ROOF TOPOGRAPHY IIIJJJ 3116=" V-0" V EXISTING ROOF TOPOGRAPHY &16"= V-0" Z-203 N HEIGHTS OVER 1 4 8 16 ® TOPOGRAPHY 715 West Main Street,Suite 204 Aspen,Colorado 81611 P:970.279.4157 F:888.770.5585 101 E HALLAM HALLAM LLC 101 E Hallam St Aspen,Colorado 81611 CONSULTANTS SURVEYOR Aspen Survey Engineers,Inc. _ --- 210 S Galena Street Aspen,Colorado 81611 1 - - - (970)925-3816 aspensurveyors@Dgmail.com CIVIL - _ _ -- MECHANICAL TBD I 'a \I STRUCTURAL TBD \ \ CONTRACTOR TBD PROPOSED WEST FACADE REV PROPOSED SOUTH FACADE REV 7QQD14 DATE OF PUBUCAMN HPC CONCEPT.REV. f PROJECT NO: 1411 DRAWN BY: KPT COPYRIGHT FORUM PHI,LLC M ry I -°-- SHEET TITLE _ Z-204 PROPOSED EAST FACADE PROPOSED NORTH FACADE REV PROPOSED FACADES 715 West Main Street,Suite 204 Aspen,Colorado 81611 P:970.279.4157 F:866.770.5585 w x 101 HE HALLAM LM Y � 101 E Hallam St t f\. Aspen,Colorado 81611 CONSULTANTS _ SURVEYOR Aspen Survey Engineers,Inc. 105 E HALLAM STREET 103 E HALLAM STREET 101 E HALLAM STREET(PROJECT SITE) 210 S Galena Street HISTORIC HOUSE-MIRROR OF HISTORIC PORTION OF PROJECT SITE Aspen,Colorado 81611 (970)925-3816 j aspensurveyors(8lgmail.corn CIVIL TBD -_ — MECHANICAL TBD ,. STRUCTURAL r TBD ei ca I CONTRACTOR TBD 122011 DATE OF NBLIC TION 101 E HALLAM STREET(PROJECT SITE) 101 E HALLAM STREET(PROJECT SITE) 101 E HALLAM STREET(PROJECT SITE) 101 E HALLAM STREET(PROJECT SITE) INTERSECTION OF HALLAM 8 N GARMISH STREET r i.r SD 8130/14 HPC CONCEPT,REV. PROJECT NO: 1411 DRAWN BY: KPT COPYRIGHT FORUM PHI,LLC IL SHEET TITLE Z-205 ALLEY BEHIND PROJECT SITE 100 E BLEAKER STREET 100 E BLEAKER STREET 100 E BLEAKER STREET HISTORIC HOUSE WITH NEW ADDITION HISTORIC HOUSE WITH NEW ADDITION HISTORIC HOUSE WITH NEWADDITION STREETSCAPE EXHIBIT\ �-- AFFIDAVIT OF PUBLIC NOTICE REQUIRED BY SECTION 26.304.060 (E), ASPEN LAND USE CODE. ADDRESS OF PROPERTY: 101 P. 9ALLA" , Aspen, CO SCHEDULED PUBLIC HEARING DATE: WILD. SePT 24 ,20_4 STATE OF COLORADO ) ) ss. County of Pitkin ) 1, S V W VLS"J (name, please print) being or representing an Applicant to the City of Aspen, Colorado, hereby personally certify that I have complied with the public notice requirements of Section 26.304.060 (E) of the Aspen Land Use Code in the following manner: car Publication of notice: By the publication in the legal notice section of an official paper or a paper of general circulation in the City of Aspen at least fifteen (15) days prior to the public hearing. A copy of the publication is attached hereto. Sw Posting of notice: By posting of notice, which form was obtained from the Community Development Department, which was made of suitable, waterproof materials, which was not less than twenty-two (22) inches wide and twenty-six (26) inches high, and which was composed of letters not less than one inch in height. Said notice was posted at least fifteen (15) days prior to the public hearing on the 0 day of St pr , 20 _, to and including the date and time of the public hearing. A photograph of the posted notice (sign) is attached hereto. SW Mailing of notice. By the mailing of a notice obtained from the Community Development Department, which contains the information described in Section 26.304.060(E)(2) of the Aspen Land Use Code. At least fifteen (15) days prior to the public hearing, notice was hand delivered or mailed by first class postage prepaid U.S. mail to all owners of property within three hundred (300) feet of the property subject to the development application. The names and addresses of property owners shall be those on the current tax records of Pitkin County as they appeared no more than sixty (60) days prior to the date of the public hearing. A copy of the owners and governmental agencies.so noticed is attached hereto. ' WNeighborhood Outreach: Applicant attests that neighborhood outreach, summarized and attached, was conducted prior to the first public hearing as required in Section 26.304.035, Neighborhood Outreach. A copy of the neighborhood outreach summary, including the method of public notification and a copy of any documentation that was presented to the public is attached hereto. (continued on next page) JJIA Mineral Estate Owner Notice. By the certified mailing of notice, return receipt requested, to affected mineral estate owners by at least thirty (30) days prior to the date scheduled for the initial public hearing on the application of development. The names and addresses of mineral estate owners shall be those on the current tax records of Pitkin County. At a minimum, Subdivisions, PDs that create more than one lot, and new Planned Developments are subject to this notice requirement. Rezoning or text amendment. Whenever the official zoning district map is in anv way to be changed or amended incidental to or as part of a general revision of this Title, or whenever the text of this Title is to be amended, whether such revision be made by repeal of this Title and enactment of a new land use regulation, or otherwise, the requirement of an accurate survey map or other sufficient legal description of, and the notice to and listing of names and addresses of owners of real property in the area of the proposed change shall be waived. However, the proposed zoning map shall be available for public inspection in the planning agency during all business hours for fifteen (15) days prior to the public hearing on such amendments. Signature The regoing "Affidavit of Notice" was acknowledgedn'before me this�`�day of 20A, by U V �➢`' ��L n WITNESS MY HAND AND OFFICIAL, SEAL JENNIFER NOTARY B ICIGHT y p Vou �u M co fission expires: � STATE OF COLORADO NOTARY ID#20134043266 My Commission Expires July 15,2017 Notary P V ic , ATTACHMENTS AS APPLICABLE: *COPY OF THE PUBLICATION *PHOTOGRAPH OF THE POSTED NOTICE(SIGN) • LIST OF THE OWNERS AND GOVERNMENTAL AGENCIES NOTICED B Y MAIL • APPLICANT CERTIFICATION OF MINERAL ESTAE OWNERS NOTICE AS REQUIRED BY C.R.S. §24-65.5-103.3 111 WEST FRANCIS LLC 114 EAST BLEEKER STREET ASSOC 120 EAST MAIN PARTNERS LLC 28 ROCK RIDGE AVE COMMON AREA 120 E MAIN ST GREENWICH,CT 06831 114 E BLEEKER ST ASPEN, CO 81611 ASPEN, CO 81611 BRADY WILLIAM JB III BROCKWAY LEXIE CITY OF ASPEN 14671 FIELDSTONE DR 7714 FISHER ISLAND DR 130 S GALENA ST SARATOGA, CA 95070 FISHER ISLAND, FL 33109-0966 ASPEN, CO 81611 COLLINS CINDA REV TRUST CRAWFORD RANDALL&ABIGAIL DOMINGUE FAMILY TRUST 42 PARK LN 124 N GARMISCH ST PO BOX 2293 MINNEAPOLIS, MN 55416 ASPEN, CO 81611 WINTER PARK, FL 32790 DTJ LEGACY PROPERTIES LLC ERWIN GREGORY D GARCIA STEVEN J 202 W 19TH ST PO BOX 4470 120 N GARMISCH EL DORADO,AR 71730 BASALT,CO 81621 ASPEN, CO 81611 GARMISCH LODGING LLC GSW FAMILY INV LP HENRY FREDERICK B TRUST 110 W MAIN ST 1320 HUNSICKER RD 100 W HALLAM ST ASPEN, CO 81611 LANCASTER, PA 17601 ASPEN, CO 81611 HOGUET CONSTANCE M JAMMB LLC JOHNSON RICHARD&MONTAE IMBT 333 E 68TH ST 500 S DIXIE HWY STE 201 6820 BRADBURY NEW YORK, NY 10065 CORAL GABLES, FL 33146 DALLAS,TX 75230 KRUMM DONALD PAUL REV TRUST LANDIS CAROLYN MOUNTAIN STATE PROPERTIES LLC PO BOX 874 128 N GARMISCH ST 715 10TH ST SOUTH ASPEN, CO 81612 ASPEN, CO 81611 NAPLES, FL 34102 PARDUBA JIRI PENN PAUL E&SUSAN W RODNEY JOHN W 116 N GARMISCH ST 3830 E 79TH ST 8536 N GOLF DR ASPEN,CO 81612 INDIANAPOLIS, IN 46260-3457 PARADISE VALLEY,AZ 85253 ROSE BRANDON SARDY HOUSE NEW LLC SPEARS NANCY M 625 MT HOPE RD 240 CRANDON BLVD#167 PO BOX 2630 WHARTON, NJ 07885 KEY BISCAYNE, FL 33149 ASPEN, CO 81612 WOLKENMUTH EDWARD F JR&STEELE ZATS JULIE JULIANNE BELL REV TRUST 118 N GARMISCH 121 W BLEEKER ST ASPEN, CO 81611 ASPEN, CO 81611 S . AFFIDAVIT OF PUBLIC NOTICE REQUIRED BY SECTION 26.304.060 (E), ASPEN LAND USE CODE ADDRESS OF PROPERTY: Aspen, CO SCHEDULED PUBLIC HEARING DATE: 5:0042 yy-, , 20L STATE OF COLORADO ) ss. County of Pitkin ) I, A .e-,-er,,t� (name, please print) being or representing an Applicant to the City of Aspen, Colorado, hereby personally certify that I have complied with the public notice requirements of Section 26.304.060 (E) of the Aspen Land Use Code in the following manner: Publication of notice: By the publication in the legal notice section of an official paper or a paper of general circulation in the City of Aspen at least fifteen (15) days prior to the public hearing. A copy of the publication is attached hereto. Posting of notice: By posting of notice, which form was obtained from the Community Development Department, which was made of suitable, waterproof materials, which was not less than twenty-two (22) inches wide and twenty-six (26) inches high, and which was composed of letters not less than one inch in height. Said notice was posted at least fifteen(15) days prior to the public hearing on the day of , 20 , to and including the date and time of the public hearing. A photograph of the posted notice (sign) is attached hereto. Mailing of notice. By the mailing of a notice obtained from the Community Development Department, which contains the information described in Section 26.304.060(E)(2) of the Aspen Land Use Code. At least fifteen (15) days prior to the public hearing, notice was hand delivered or mailed by first class postage prepaid U.S. mail to all owners of property within three hundred (300) feet of the property subject to the development application. The naives and addresses of property owners shall be those on the current tax records of Piticin County as they appeared no more than sixty (60) days prior to the date of the public hearing. A copy of the owners and governmental agencies so noticed is attached hereto. Neighborhood Outreach: Applicant attests that neighborhood outreach, summarized and attached, was conducted prior to the first public hearing as required in Section 26.304.035, Neighborhood Outreach. A copy of the neighborhood outreach suna»iafy, including the method of public notification and a copy of any documentation that was presented to the public is attached hereto. (continued 077 next page) i Mineral Estate Owner Notice. By the certified mailing of notice, return receipt requested, to affected mineral estate owners by at least thirty (30) days prior to the date scheduled for the initial public hearing on the application of development. The names and addresses of mineral estate owners shall be those on the current tax records of Pitkin County. At a minimum, Subdivisions, SPAs or PUDs that create more than one lot, new Planned Unit Developments, and new Specially -Planned Areas, are subject to this notice requirement. Rezoning or text amendment. Whenever the official zoning district map is in any way to be changed or amended incidental to or as part of a general revision of this Title, or whenever the text of this Title is to be amended, whether such revision be made by repeal of this Title and enactment of a new land use regulation, or otherwise, the requirement of an accurate survey map or other sufficient legal description of, and the notice to and listing of names and addresses of owners of real property in the area of the proposed change shall be waived. However, the proposed zoning map shall be available for public inspection iin the planning agency during all business hours for fifteen (15) days prior to the public hearing on such amendments. Signature The foregoing"Affidavit of Notice" was acknowledged before me this day of 5�,�1� , 20 LJ�,by = -Tr PUBLIC NOTICE WITNESS MY HAND AND OFFICIAL SEAL RE:101 E.HALLAM-MINOR DEVELOPMENT AND TEMPORARY RELOCATION NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that a public hearing My commission expires. will be held on Wednesday,September 24,2014,. at a meeting to begin at 5:00 p.m.before the As- pen Historic Preservation Commission,in Council Chambers,City Hall,130 S.Galena St.,Aspen. HPC will consider an application submitted by Hal- ' lam LLC,represented by Forum Phi Architecture, with consent of the property owner,Patricia Gor- man,101 E.Hallam Street,Aspen,CO 81611. The o ary applicant requests Minor Development to construct '°""�"''"""�"' a new addition to the existing Victorian house,and Ki REN REED PATTERSON Temporary Relocation to underpin and excavate a basement beneath the house. The property is le- gally described as 101 E.Hallam,Lot A and the NOTARY PUBLIC west 4.86'of Lot B,Block 65,City and Townsite of STATE OF COLORADO Aspen,PIDM 2735-124-37-001.The applicant re- quests setback variances on the east,west,rear NOTARY ID#19964002767 and combined yards for existing and new construc- tion,and a reduction of the required distance be- ATTACHMENTS AS t PLICAB ti My:%'+117mISSion Expires February tb,2018 "wean the house and existing sheid. For further in- IE P UBLICA TION formation,contact Amy Simon at the City of Aspen Community Development Department,130 s.58, !PH OF THE POSTED NOTICE (SIGN) lens St., Aspen, CO, (97D) 429-2758, amy.simon@dtyofaspen.com. er,Iay Maydn B OWNERS AND GOVERNMENTAL AGENCIES NOTICED Chair,Aspen Historic Preservation Commission Published in the Aspen Times on September 4, Published in the Aspen Times weekly on Septem- I,CER TIFICA TION OF MINERAL ES TAE O WNERS NOTICE bar a,2of4.(1os1460.3) TD BY C.R.S. §2465.5-103.3 pp� ar i PUBLIC NOTICE Tirnr A �3 r. u x 4 x p g 3 aglow 4 � , „m„µ4.;w P`•r l0 a t ro 0 w � ' Q W MEMORANDUM TO: Aspen Historic Preservation Commission FROM: Amy Simon, Historic Preservation Officer RE: 610 E. Hyman Avenue—Final Major Development and Commercial Design Review, Public Hearing DATE: September 24, 2014 SUMMARY: 610 E. Hyman Avenue was constructed for well known gallery owner Patricia Moore in 1963. It was designed by Ellie Brickham, who in 1951 was the first female architect to arrive in Aspen. Charles Cunniffe ' Architects has been the owner and tenant for twenty years. In late 2012, the property was reviewed for voluntary designation and a building expansion through the AspenModern process. HPC granted �. . Conceptual .design approval and Council I completed the designation negotiations. The HPC resolution and Council ordinance are attached. The applicant received square footage bonuses and affordable housing reductions to allow fora ;T second floor office expansion and enlargement of the existing upper floor apartment. HPC is asked to approve Final design review. APPLICANT: 610 E. Hyman LLC,represented by Charles Cunniffe Architects. PARCEL ID:2737-182-12-004. ADDRESS: 610 E. Hyman Avenue, Lot M, Block 99, City and Townsite of Aspen, Colorado. ZONING: C-1, Commercial. HPC Review 9.24.2014 610 E.Hyman—Charles Cunniffe Architects Page 1 of 7 . I P39 FINAf, DESIGN REVIEW The procedure for a Major Development Review, at the Conceptual level, is as follows. Staff reviews the submittal materials and prepares a report that analyzes the project's conformance with the design guidelines and other applicable Land Use Code Sections This report is transmitted to the HPC with relevant information on the proposed project and a recommendation to continue, approve, disapprove or approve with conditions and the reasons for the recommendation. The HPC will review the application, the staff analysis report and the evidence presented at the hearing to determine the project's conformance with the City of Aspen Historic Preservation Design Guidelines rove with conditions, or continue the The HPC may approve, disapprove, app application to obtain additional information necessary to make a decision to approve or deny. Major Development is a two-step process requiring approval by the HPC of a Conceptual Development Plan, and then a Final Development Plan. Approval of a Conceptual Development Plan shall be binding upon HPC in regards to the location and form of the envelope of the structure(s) and/or addition(s) as depicted in the Conceptual Plan application including its height, scale, massing and proportions No changes will be made to this aspect of the proposed development by the HPC as part of their review of the Final Development Plan unless agreed to_by the applicant. Staff Response: Final review focuses on landscape plan, lighting, fenestration, and selection of new materials. A list of the relevant design guidelines is attached as"Exhibit A." The existing building contains office space on the garden level and main floor, and a residential unit and courtyard on the upper floor. The proposal is to create an addition at the back of the site, sitting on top office garage/carport ces. O op of that will bean addition on to the above the carport will be two new p existing apartment. Because the proposed new construction is located at the rear of the property, visibility of the addition from the street will be very limited, in staff's assessment. Only a small portion of the proposed third floor encroaches onto the 1963. Some alterations to the windows on the front of the building have occurred over the years. As part of this AspenModern project, the applicant will restore the original 2'd floor deck to an open air courtyard. The stucco panels on the building will be painted white, as they were originally. The arched window shape will be recreated on the ground floor. This last item was a sticking point during the HPC review of the project. The applicant was hesitant to change the existing windows, but was persuaded to do so during the Council negotiation. Minutes and drawings from the HPC Conceptual review are attached as Exhibit B. HPC Review 9.24.2014 610 E.Hyman—Charles Cunniffe Architects Page 2 of 7 P40 During the HPC and Council reviews, the only available resources representing the original appearance of the building were a sketch and a low quality photograph. Since then, a photo has been located in the archives of the Denver Public Library. This photo is dated 1966, three years after construction. = Yi lss � 3" Sr 4 3.r.-y',•_ 'z,�r .wtiu�'tK- v' u`.�'ys ,r.1.rt � y },,'�'".t i y. z�� �yfr 4+�'`4xrr �`•s�`k m t _ y j j s f: - J 1.-.l ,• -. .. .. . For Final review, there have been some changes in the proposed materials, and the roof line of the new addition is canted, where it was previously more flat. The project remains within the approved dimensional limits. Staff finds that the HPC guidelines for Final HPC approval are met. The project will be bring back much of the original design of the building and it will contribute to the midcentury design history represented by six landmarked buildings located in a short stretch of E. Hyman Avenue. HPC Review 9.24.2014 610 E.Hyman—Charles Cunniffe Architects Page 3 of 7 . P41 Staff and monitor will need to review details for the new arched windows, and any new proposed outdoor lighting fixtures prior to building permit. COMMERCIAL DESIGN REVIEW The City has an adopted set of guidelines, "Commercial, Lodging and Historic District Design Objectives" which are in addition to the HPC design guidelines. Development on this site is affected by the chapter that addresses what is known et ashthe "Commercial Character Area." All of the Conceptual level guidelines address issues that are not generally applicable to a remodel, rather than all new construction. Staff finds that no additional review is needed, except for discussion of the applicants request to exceed the 36' height threshold for three story buildings, discussed below. Any additional design guidelines that are applicable to Final will be presented to HPC at that time. An application for commercial design review may be approved, approved with conditions or denied based on conformance with the following criteria: A. The proposed development meets the requirements of Section 26.412.060, Commercial design standards, or any deviation from the standards provides a more appealing pattern of development considering the dcaonteiwhi to contrant can development is proposed and the purpose of the particular st Unique justify a deviation from the standards. Compliance with Section 26.412.070, Suggested design elements,is not required but may be used to justify a deviation from the standards. S. For proposed development converting an existing structure to commercial use,the proposed development meets the requirements of Section 26.412.060, Commercial design standards,to the greatest extent practical. Changes to the fagade of the building may be required to comply with this Section. C. The application shall comply with the guidelines within the Commercial, Lodging and Historic District Design Objectives and Guidelines as determined, by the appropriate Commission. The guidelines set forth design review criteria, standards and guidelines that are to be used in making determinations of appropriateness. The City shall determine when a proposal is in compliance with the criteria, standards and guidelines. Although these criteria, standards and guidelines are relatively comprehensive, there may be circumstances where alternative ways of meeting the intent of the policy objectives might be identified. In such a case, the City must determine that the intent of the guideline is still met, albeit through alternative means. Staff Response: The Commercial Design guidelines are also shown in Exhibit A. Staff finds the Final Commercial Design guidelines for this project are met. The major topic of the Commercial Design process during the Conceptual hearing was providing for trash and recycling needs. This project was given special approval to share services with the 616 E. Hyman building, immediately to the west. This is an artraangement that as 610 E.Hyman—Charles Cunniffe Architects Page 4 of 7 P42 gone on for some time. The property owners were required to submit a formal agreement assuring that their cooperative arrangement can be relied on. City staff will continue to work with the applicant team to finalize any details and record the agreement, which is attached to this memo. The agreement must be recorded within 30 days of HPC Final approval. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends approval of this project finding that the guidelines and review criteria are met, with the following conditions: 1. Staff and monitor must review and approve details for the new arched windows and any proposed exterior lighting prior to building.permit. 2. The agreement to share trash and recycling services with 616 E. Hyman must be recorded within 30 days of this approval. 3. The development approvals granted herein shall constitute a site-specific development plan and a vested property right attaching to and running with the Subject Property and shall confer upon the Applicant the right to undertake and complete the site specific development plan and use of said property under the terms and conditions of the site specific development plan including any approved amendments thereto. The vesting period of these vested property rights shall be for five (5) years which shall not begin to run until the date of the publications required to be made as set forth below. However, any failure to abide by any of the terms and conditions attendant to this approval shall result in the forfeiture of said vested property rights. Unless otherwise exempted or extended, failure to properly record all plats and agreements required to be recorded, as specified herein, within 180 days of the effective date of the development order shall also result in the forfeiture of said vested property rights and shall render the development order void within the meaning of§ 26.104.050, Void Permits. Zoning that is not part of the approved site-specific development plan shall not result in the creation of a vested property right. No later than fourteen (14) days following final approval by the Historic Preservation Commission, the City Clerk shall cause to be published in a newspaper of general circulation within the jurisdictional boundaries of the City of Aspen, a notice advising the general public of the approval of a site specific development plan and creation of a vested property right pursuant to Chapter 26.308, Vested Property Rights. Pursuant to § 26.304.070(A), Development Orders, such notice shall be substantially in the following form: Notice is hereby given to the general public of the approval of a site specific development plan, and the creation of a vested property right, valid for a period of five (5) years,pursuant to the Land Use Code of the City of Aspen HPC Review 9.24.2014 610 E.Hyman—Charles Cunniffe Architects Page 5 of 7 P43 and Title 24, Article 68, Colorado Revised Statutes, pertaining to the following described property: 610 E. Hyman Avenue, Lot M, Block 99, City and Townsite of Aspen. Nothing in this approval shall exempt the Development Order from subsequent reviews and approvals required by this Ordinance of the general rules, regulations and ordinances or the City of Aspen provided that such reviews and approvals are not inconsistent with this Ordinance. The vested rights granted hereby shall be subject to all rights of referendum and judicial review. The period of time permitted by law to exercise the right of referendum to refer to the electorate this Section of this Ordinance granting vested rights; or, to seek judicial review of the grant of vested rights shall not begin to run until the date of publication of the notice of final development approval as set forth above. The rights of referendum described herein shall be no greater than those set forth in the Colorado Constitution and the Aspen Home Rule Charter. EXHIBITS' HPC Resolution#_, Series of 2014 Exhibit A: Design Guidelines Exhibit B: HPC minutes and conceptual design Exhibit C: Trash agreement Exhibit D: Application "Exhibit A: Relevant HPC Design Guidelines and Commercial Character Area Guidelines for 610 E.Hyman, Final Review" 10.3 Design a new addition such that one's ability to interpret the historic character of the primary building is maintained. ❑ A new addition that creates an appearance inconsistent with the historic character of the primary building is inappropriate. Li addition that seeks to imply an earlier period than that of the primary building also is inappropriate. ❑ An addition that seeks to imply an inaccurate variation of the primary building's historic style should be avoided. - - ❑ An addition that covers historically significant features is inappropriate. 10.4 Design a new should made distinguishable from the historic building, while also remaining visually compatible with these earlier features. ❑ A change in setbacks of the addition from the historic building, a subtle change in material or a differentiation between historic, and more current styles are all HPC Review 9.24.2014 610 E.Hyman—Charles Cunniffe Architects Page 6 of 7 P44 techniques that may be considered to help define a change from old to new construction. 10.11 On a new addition, use exterior materials that are compatible with the historic materials of the primary building. ❑ The new materials should be either similar or subordinate to the original materials. 10.14 The roof form and slope of a new addition should be in character with the historic building. • If the roof of the historic building is symmetrically proportioned, the roof of the addition should be similar. • Eave lines on the addition should be similar to those of the historic building or structure. 1.45 The roofscape should be designed with the same design attention as the secondary elevations of the building. • Group and screen mechanical units from view. • Locate mechanical equipment to the rear of the roof area. ❑ Position, articulate and design rooftop enclosures or structures to reflect the modulation and character of the building. • Use materials which complement the design of the building fagades. • Design roof garden areas to be unobtrusive from the street. • Use'green roof design best practice, where feasible. 1.46 High quality,durable materials should be employed. ❑ The palette of materials should be specified, including samples of materials as required. 1.47 Building materials should have these features: • Convey the quality and range of materials seen traditionally • Reduce the perceived scale of the building and enhance visual interest of the facade ❑ Convey a human scale ❑ Have proven durability and weathering characteristics within Aspen's climate 1.48 A building or additions should reflect the quality and variation in materials seen traditionally. 1.49 Where contemporary materials are used they shall be: ❑ High quality in durability and finish ❑ Detailed to convey a human scale ❑ Compatible with a traditional masonry palette 1.50 Materials used for third floor accommodation set back from the street favade(s) should be more subdued than the primary faVades. HPC Review 9.24.2014 610 E.Hyman—Charles Cunniffe Architects Page 7 of 7 P45 A RESOLUTION OF THE ASPEN HISTORIC LOPM NPRESERVATION ND COMMERCIAL DESIGN APPROVING FINAL MAJOR STANDARD REVIEW RESOLUTION#_,SERIES OF 2014 PARCEL ID: 2737-182-12-004 WHEREAS, the applicant, 610 E. Hyman LLC, has requested Final Major Development and Commercial Design Review for an expansion to the landmarked property located at 610 E. Hyman Avenue,Lot M, Block 99, City and Townsite of Aspen; and WHEREAS, Section 26.415.070 of the Municipal Code states that "no building or structure shall be erected, constructed, enlarged, altered, repaired, relocated or improved involving a designated historic property or district until plans or sufficient information have been submitted to the Community Development Director and approved in accordance with the procedures established for their review;" and WHEREAS,for Final Major Development Review,the HPC must review the application, a staff analysis report and the evidence presented at a hearing to determine the project's conformance with the City of Aspen Historic Preservation Design Guidelines per Section 26.415.070 of the Municipal Code and other applicable Code Sections. The HPC may approve, disapprove, approve with conditions or continue the application to obtain additional information necessary to make a decision to approve or deny; and WHEREAS, for Conceptual Commercial Design Review, the HPC must review the application, a staff analysis report and the evidence presented at a hearing to determine the project's conformance with the Commercial, Lodging, and Historic District Objectives and Guidelines with Section 26.412.040 of the Municipa Code.o obtain additionalapnformataon necessary approve make a conditions or continue the application decision to approve or deny; and WHEREAS, Amy Simon, in her staff report.to HPC dated September 24, 2014, performed an analysis of the application based on the standards. Staff recommended approval of the project with conditions; and WHEREAS, at their regular meeting on September 24, 2014, the Historic Preservation Commission considered the application during a duly noticed public tobe consistent with the review recommendation, and public comments, and found project criteria by a vote of—to_. NOW,THEREFORE,BE IT RESOLVED: That HPC hereby approves Final Major Development and Commercial Design Review with the following conditions: 610 E.Hyman Avenue—AspenModem HPC Resolution#_, Series of 2012 P46 1. Staff and monitor must review and approve details for the new arched windows and any proposed exterior lighting prior to building permit. 2. The agreement to share trash and recycling services with 616 E. Hyman must be recorded within 30 days of this approval. 3. The development approvals granted herein shall constitute a site-specific development plan and a vested property right attaching to and running with the Subject Property and shall confer upon the Applicant the right to undertake and complete the site specific development plan and use of said property under the terms and conditions of the site specific development plan including any approved amendments thereto. The vesting period of these vested property rights shall be for five (5) years which shall not begin to run until the date of the publications required to be made as set forth below. However, any failure to abide by any of the terms and conditions attendant to this approval shall result in the forfeiture of said vested property rights. Unless otherwise exempted or extended, failure to properly record all plats and agreements required to be recorded, as specified herein, within 180 days of the effective date of the development order shall also result in the forfeiture of said vested property rights and shall render the development order void within the meaning of § 26.104.050, Void Permits. Zoning that is not part of the approved site-specific development plan shall not result in the creation of a vested property right. No later than fourteen (14) days following final approval by the Historic Preservation Commission, the City Clerk shall cause to be published in a newspaper of general circulation within the jurisdictional boundaries of the City of Aspen, a notice advising the general public of the approval of a site specific development plan and creation of a vested property right pursuant to Chapter 26.308, Vested Property Rights. Pursuant to § 26.304.070(A), Development Orders, such notice shall be substantially in the following form: Notice is hereby given to the general public of the approval of a site specific development plan, and the creation of a vested property right, valid for a period of five (5) years, pursuant to the Land Use Code of the City of Aspen and Title 24, Article 68, Colorado Revised Statutes, pertaining to the following described property: 610 E. Hyman Avenue,Lot M, Block 99, City and Townsite of Aspen. Nothing in this approval shall exempt the Development Order from subsequent reviews and approvals required by this Ordinance of the general rules, regulations and ordinances or the City of Aspen provided that such reviews and approvals are not inconsistent with this Ordinance. The vested rights granted hereby shall be subject to all rights of referendum and judicial review. The period of time permitted by law to exercise the right of referendum to refer to the electorate this Section of this Ordinance granting vested rights; or, to seek judicial review of the grant of vested rights shall not begin to run until the date of publication of the notice of final development approval as set forth above. The rights of referendum described herein shall be no greater than those set forth in the Colorado Constitution and the Aspen Home Rule Charter. 610 E.Hyman Avenue—AspenModern HPC Resolution#_, Series of 2012 P47 APPROVED BY THE COMMISSION at its regular meeting on the 24th day of September, 2014. Jay Maytin,Chair Approved as to Form: Debbie Quinn,Assistant City Attorney ATTEST: Kathy Strickland,Chief Deputy Clerk 610 E.Hyman Avenue—AspenModern HPC Resolution#_, Series of 2012 o� f I .r..:,.:, :•:•ksi:6•. 'rs..sr.-' ..,,, ;, Y ^_ ..—. .a. �nmaaom I casfwrr .. - U) U ' vrs���, I �.•' ',',r{y _._ ...._..__' `3�eY..tu[4� "R' � � .__...—�0•a,�+,.T_r„y LU LL � L/ WES•T rE•LEVATION: U $ N - �/— "• p, J � _�. � e i —: - - - - _ - - -- - - L a..� .__.. ___— .. _ .._ aO..0•was - .__ - ___ •nn, _ I esevArlor+s I NORTH (ALLEY)ELEVATION I, sEti ND EAST ELEVATION n3•1 j T•o" /1 Oo 01 T . HYMAN BUILDING CHARLES CUNNIFFE ARCHITECTS ©�i 610 EAST www.cunrftffe.com N m ®■ FAX SWIA4W 6td 610 EAST HYMAN AVENUE ASPEN,COLORADO...-,. YEW NJSIEfl�BEpgON r I ,. NMI YEW OFFICE II V; ;�� YES BI.IE_ F nW E%Sn\'O MNi1NFM j \O DOOR HWM.annM�.00T j • I — r..................... I IEU � IXS TNO OF E I MS-0 WIC E OF F H SICq F10E i c.r.. _ I EJ0.9TIKO OAPME ____ —--_.. — ...•. n•b I I EX'uTY6 OFfInE L[rF -2 U .... �� EwsTwp pEFICE ..._..II_..._.—_...;.._., ��.'—' lef•-:u•-�' W � - -- •-YES LLL. _ ExsTN•a srplwcE U i __BUILDING SECTION J � I (SSSQQQ� I - U a KEw NA9TEq nEaeoora OF i I z I YEW OFFICE II 11 IIl EJObiNO AFM JJJ II r IW Q IXSIYYO OFFICE I EASMKi MCE I E STITfi OFfltf 11 DPSnK6 GWGE —.. I .._......•.—i .--'— - sL,':P CMIYYR _ —h� Ff a FXSTIVO OICE 1: � cr p— i EJ0Mg STONOE J~ _ 91FFTN6 r;L BUILDING SECTION -o 0 P51 ASPEN HISTORIC PRESERVATION ri'OBER 2 C O1ISSION MINUTES OF O C MOTION: Jay moved to approve resolution#26 second by Jane. Motion carried 4-1. Nora opposed. 610 E. Hyman—AspenModern Negotiation for Conceptual Co mercial Designation, Conceptual Major Development, p Design Review, Special Review for utility/trash recycling area, continued from October 10th—public hearing Jane recused herself. Amy summarized the staff memo. This is afor me landmark benefits that voluntary offer of designation in exchange are available for all properties. In terms of designation staff finds that it meets the criteria. Ellie Brickham in 1951 was Aspen's first female architect. This is a good example of her design talents.There of the been alterations to the building and hascored o do with floor area. There is an negotiation the first incentive allowance for 1500 square feet of residential f twark t much. That floor property and the applicant is asking for gust over in area figure covers not only the actual living area ao lone also drags It also common hallway and deck area. This project is g for pushes them slightly over the cap for what a building that just has commercial and free market uses ought to have by arsquare sking for ten years vested rights everyone receives three years Y to allow more time to move forward. There are standard�l landmark for benefits which are available to all designated properti y they are creating. affordable housing mitigation waiver for the office space be around$250,000. If they had to pay for a non-historic property ffice but they wouldn't pay anything in this scenario. e on site expansion of the are as space triggers the need for a partial parking spa to not provide the parking space but not pay the, al cash-in-lieu fee which is exempt would have been about$28,000. Their residential from certain fees related to city parks and transportation. In terms ft ETC generally makes comment he incentives city council is t se HPC that s also asked to review the conceptual design for the proposed addition at the back of the building.because it is along HPC guidelines staff finds that the addition is acceptable the alley and doesn't encroach upon the historic rb�1 design in elf needs to have a negative impact. In terms of the comm g consider the request to go over the height limit, The height limit is 36 feet 6 P52 ASPEN HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION MINUTES OF OCTOBER 24,2012 measured from grade and their proposal is 3 8.11 to the top of the residential unit in the back. Our concern is that it looks like the floor to ceiling height on the third floor is about 12 feet which seems like it could be reduced and the height increase lessened. On the utility delivery issue every property downtown is expected to have a certain amount devoted to the functional needs of the building about 120 square feet and it should be along the alley so trash can be picked up easily. This property currently has no trash area that meets code. There is an internalized area for recycling and they have an agreement with the neighbor. That does not meet the standards. We have not seen any agreement that this will continue. In theory HPC could grant a complete waiver but.we do not think.that an appropriate plan. One suggestion is to eliminate one of the existing on-site parking spaces which then generates its own variance and cash-in-lieu and perhaps that is a way to accommodate the trash. Council has already awarded an extension on this project part of which HPC's agendas were so blocked up but the current extension expires in December. If this project cannot leave HPC with a recommendation tonight staff is not inclined to recommend an additional extension. We feel there has not been enough preservation effort represented in the project to out weight the benefits. The character of the windows has changed from the original design which has changed how you perceive the building from the street. We are concerned about having a certain standard to hold up that the AspenModern program can achieve certain things that the community can clearly see. The removal of the canopy and stucco on the fagade are not significant movement back to the original character. We would like to see this project work out but we feel we are not in the right place to approve it and we are not recommending HPC approval. Nora asked what has changed since we saw this the last two times. Amy said one of the things was the calculations on the building which were not clear enough for us to take a position. We didn't understand what some of the square footages were. Amy said designation doesn't happen if the negotiation doesn't occur. Staff finds that the building worthy of designation but-we are concerned that the other end of the proposal isn't meeting up to the standards. Willis asked for clarification regarding the trash, Amy said they are required to have 120 square feet on the site for their trash area and they have none 7 P53 ASPEN HISTORIC PRE FRVA—T R 24C pMMISSION MINUTES OF that qualifies now. HPC can accept any arrangement that you think appropriate. If you were going to ask them to provide any a the site it is c going to impact one of the existing parking spaces. UPC can grant a variance to eliminate the parking space and you can eliminate the fee. Charles Cunniffe said in 2003 when he got approval to build the garage in the back the building was designed to have two stories in the future. The trash area was negotiated with the city and the city allowed us to do a recycle center instead of the traditional dumpster. The building has a gas meter on the back of it and has the meters along the car port. The recycling center has three bins for glass, aluminum and paper. It is used jointly with the neighboring properties. We would continue to work something out with them. We are attempting to be as paper free as possible. Most of our products are recyclable. It is the only 30 foot lot that is constrained in the neighborhood and if you put a 10 x 20 space in the back you would have a ten foot parking space. It is in the best.interest to have a recycling center rather than a trash/utility area. We have four spaces and have the adequate parking. It is a two car garage and a two tandem space which was also approved in 2003. Ellie Brickham was a friend �mine Otdo with the are world. When I talked to her building she was very much in favor of me changing the windows. It is a better solar gain and the additions of the transoms allowed allowe for the fro tl of the haven't changed anything regarding the solid/void pattern building. The only thing I altered is the lower arch is now squared off for a transom window. Mitch Haas,Hass land planning: With ordinance 48 and Aspen Modern the 90 day negotiation forces us to take a short view of the property and the effects of designation. It seems to put everyone in we want everything right now or nothing at all approach to a negotiation which is not really haw one enters into a negotiation. There were three points of restoration: the arched windows, color of t Oen the stucco and the removal of the canopy. Charles agreed to two of the three, and integrity assessment it scored 15 points which is on the borer best e of bett le e If this best. By doing the two restoatithlbe no HPC review orp building is not on the inventory le would consideration ever going forward. In the way of incentives is entl we l have asked aid out and for additional free market a building than would be in any other building. there is a lot of common area and stairs We have requested a free market area of 3,053 square feet. The unit itself is 8 P54 ASPEN HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION MINUTES OF OCTOBER 24,2012 1908 square feet of net livable space: Right now it is a studio to become a one bedroom unit. 286 square feet is counted as wall thicknesses and another 473 in circulation spaces that are shared for the commercial spaces below and another 385 deck space that is counting as floor area. Also the code requires an elevator. There is no parking requirement in the C1 zone district and none for the residential unit. At the alley the proposed height is 40 feet as submitted because the alley starts lower than the sidewalk. We are trying to look at the ceiling heights a little closer. We can drop it to 38 feet at the alley. Both buildings are going to go to three stories and will overwhelm this building. Mitch said the trash sits behind the golfco building to the east and is shared with this building. The recycling is behind our building. The golfco building has been approved by P&Z which is 9 feet along the alley and 20 feet deep. This project will be coming back for HPC final review and it doesn't have to be completely satisfied and addressed right now. When we come in for final we will either have letters of agreement from the neighbor or we will have a specific proposal for the H PC. We will resolve it or we won't get final approval from the HPC. You should save this building. Charles said if you look at the drawings there is not a significant alteration on the building. The most significant alteration is the canopy which is going to be removed. I feel what I did as appropriate to the building. Amy said she didn't hear until tonight that there was an tandem parking space on the site. I was under the impression that there were three parking spaces. That is adequate for the net leasable. The code does not allow commercial uses to count stacked parking spaces as adequate you have to have unobstructed access to the alley. That fourth space is not OK as the mitigation for this commercial building. It is great that you are working with your neighbors on recycling but the other side of the equation is that you have no place to put your trash. I don't think the existing arrangement is going to.work. Vice-chair Jay Maytin opened the public hearing, Junee Kirk said she served on the preservation committee, I recall that there weren't that many on the AspenModern list that were to be preserved. I'm surprised that this is coming under ordinance 448. 9 P55 ASPEN HISTORIC PRE ;E IA ER 2 CONNIISSION MINUTES OF Amy said the task force did not get to that level of detail. We aren't actually talking about getting this building to perfection, There are changes that we aren't even suggestion that should be undone like moving the entry to the center and filling in the light well. Vice-chair Jay Maytin closed the public comment portion of the agenda item. Jay said you can walk to the recycling area from the alley. If this agreement falls apart would you be able to collect your trash in this area.unique because it is a Charles said we have adequate access and this case a d there are no changes single tenant. All the changes are above the garage to the first floor. Nora said I thought it was clear that there were things that we wanted to see done before we thought it could be designated. I can't support designation and this is a very significant building and I don't ook like, Maybe the board given the respect of what the restoration show should vote on whether this building should be designated. Charles said he had to move the doors per code 'issues which were not in effect in 1962. It was a building code. Willis said he doesn't see anything substantially different presented from the last meeting. Mitch said we had to get all the calculations in the cad. Charles said before I wasn't willing to change the stucco or the canopy and now I am willing to change those. Willis asked if Charles talked to Marty Flug about a I can talk to him. agreement. Charles said we co-share the cost now Commissioner comments: Nora said she cannot support designation, Willis said there are four points of restoration that have been discussed. The same four things have been discussed at every hearing in the past. The 10 P56 ASPEN HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION MINUTES OF OCTOBER 24,2012 canopy, the arches at the second level, the stucco color and the entry door change. We aren't asking for perfection and eliminated the entry door.. The other three are the essence of Ellie Brickham. AspenModern negotiation has potential for demolition. The spirit of AspenModern is for the developer to think twice about their actions. We have asked for three out of four things and you should just do it and enjoy the benefits that with it. Jay said his fear is that this building will go away and people will be upset. The removal of the canopy was a huge step. I don't agree with the ten year vested rights. This building will probably be dwarfed after the two buildings on either side are done. This will be a better project than letting it go. I also agree that the utility for a restaurant should be different than for an office building, Sallie said it is great that the canopy is removed. The color change is good but I think when we asked for three I wanted three. I would support giving more time and figuring out how we can designate a building that looks like the original building that she designed. Charles said the arches are not functional, Willis said part of the charm is the arches that speak to the era. Charles said the arches are one of many things that make the building historic. If you put the arches back there is less light. MOTION: Willis moved to approve resolution#27 with the following conditions that the first level arches return to the restoration and some agreement about the trash be submitted and that council take up the issues of vested rights. All the incentives are ok. Motion second by Sallie. Motion carried 3-1. Nora voted no. MOTION: Jay moved to adjourn; second by Nora. All in favor, motion carried. Meeting adjourned at 8:00 p.m. Kathleen J. Strickland, Chief Deputy Clerk I1 P57 RECIPROCAL TRASH AND RECYCLING AGREEMENT This Reciprocal Trash and Recycling Agreement("Aare` erred')is made and entered i to this ZZ1X day of ��t!•1rr 2014 by and between 610 East Hyman, , Colorado limited liability company and Furngulf LLP, a Colorado limited liability partnership RECITALS A. 610 is the owner of real property in Pitkin County, Colorado described as Lot M, Block 99, City and Townsite of Aspen and known as 610 E. Hyman Ave., Aspen, Colorado 81611 (the"610610 P1_-")- B. Furngulf is the owner of real property in Pitkin County, Colorado described as Lots N and O, Block 99,City and Townsite of Aspen and known as 616 E.Hyman Ave., Aspen, Colorado 81611 (the"Furnplf Property") C. As of the date hereof,there are three 96-gallon recycling bins on the 610 Property located behind the building located on the 610 Property(the"Reclin Bins"). D. As of the date hereof,there is a two-yard trash dumpster on the Furngulf Property located behind the building located on the Furngulf Property(the"Trash Dumpster"). E. Historically 610 and t of the rRecycling ecy ling BBins for aall of their recycling,and 610 and Furngulf have shared the cos F. Historically 610 and h Trash D e.pster for all of their trash, and 610 and Furngulf have shared the cost of the trash G. Pursuant to Historic 23, Series f 2012 and (the certain0 ' the City of Aspen approved H b tothe6 0 Property pursuant to the AspenModern Program. H. Section 2.3 of the Ordinance requires 610 to provide this Agreement to memorialize the understanding of 610 and Furngulf with respect to their sharing of trash and recycling services. NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the mutual covenants, terms, conditions and restrictions contained herein,a knowledother ed�the parties agreelas follawsconsideration, the receipt and sufficiency of which is hereby g 1. Mutual Access Rivhts Costs. (a) 610 hereby grants to Furngulf, its successors and assigns, the right to unlimited access and use of the Recycling Bins on the 610 Property. 610 and Furngulf shall each pay for one-half of the cost for the recycling service. 1 P58 (b) Furngulf hereby grants to 610, its successors and assigns, the right to unlimited access and use of the Trash Dumpster on the Furngulf Property. 610 and Furngulf shall each pay for one-half of the cost for the trash service. 2. Alterations. 610 reserves the right, in its sole discretion,to change the placement, type, number, size and configuration of the Recycling Bins and the recycling service contractor; provided, however, that Furngulf must continue to have reasonable access to, and the right to use, the changed Recycling Bins and any changes to the placement and size of the recycling containers must be reviewed and approved by the City of Aspen Environmental Health Department. Fumgulf reserves the right, in its sole discretion, to change the placement, type, number, size and configuration of the Trash Dumpster and the trash service contractor;provided, however, that 610 must continue to have reasonable access to and the right to use the changed Trash Dumpster and any changes to the placement and size of the trash container(s) must be reviewed and approved by the City of Aspen Environmental Health Department. 3. Termination. This Agreement may be terminated by 610 or Furngulf at any time on 90 days' prior written notice to the other party. In the event of termination, Furngulf shall be required to have its own recycling and trash bins on the Furngulf Property, the placement and size of which must be reviewed and approved by the City of Aspen Environmental Health Department, and 610 shall be required to have its own recycling and trash bins on the 610 Property, the placement and size of which must be reviewed and approved by the City of Aspen Environmental Health Department. 4. Counterparts: Electronic Signatures. This Agreement may be executed in counterparts. Electronic signatures(e.g.,facsimile,email)shall be binding. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have executed this Agreement as of the day and year first above written. 610 East Hyman,LLCC By. C Cunniffe,Manager FurnguIf,LLP By: Print Name: VMSe ,LL- [Acknowledgements on Following Page] 2 P59 STATE OF C xAoc o ss. COUNTY OFtk:{� The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this '12:� day of 2014,by Charles Cunniffe,Manager of 610 East Hyman, LLC. Witness my hand and official seal. My com [SEAL 1 O NI ROSE -�j 's SW'ERSKY Notary Public ray Cor+ >�ar; F 081t612ot5 STATE OF -A: � ss. COUNTY OF Y,,� The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this day of L 2014,by - known to me or proven to my satisfaction to be such individual,as of Furngulf LLP. �x�EVtcaE �� Witness my hand and official seal. My commission expires: p-Z -,�(o. 1 Notary Public 3 O t0 CL I TPASH SIG.:! . HYN\ftN AVE1 IL!;F w A >MA�.f . . - ---- - - - - ----- Q II E I L•vi,e ciAi ___ ~Y�--1 � I,I, I I� � Gs [YJM .—E E I j ® C? I I U N R£14YGLE E oG - il 61rY5 \� N mm.WU 1 11 _ 4 IAC.GS"5 f2ULIITE MONG cAV— II I I Eru,,ac=o arcHEUtow ui '� �. z I I I ' 4 —r�l_ � I I I Is•�i� _ 1 i — �_ Q zo 0 < I I ;.�l0e,ry4.0m3.. MAIN & GARAGE LEVEL PLAN A �� A2.3 ©■ ©a CHARLES CUNNIFFE ARCHITECTS April 22, 2014 Amy Simon Historic Preservation Officer APR 2 2 2014 Aspen Community Development 130 S. Galena Street ', Cly F Aspen, CO 81611 CC. Re: HPC Final Review Aspen Modern Landmark Designation 610 E. Hyman Avenue (Lot M, Block 99, City and Townsite of Aspen) P.I.D.#2737-182-12-004 Dear Amy, We are herewith submitting our application for Final HPC Review of the 610 E. Hyman project. Following the Conceptual Review and approval by HPC on October 24, 2012, as documented in Resolution #27, series of 2012, the Aspen City Council negotiated with the Applicant and approved with conditions documented in Ordinance #23, Series of 2012. The Application for Final HPC review was postponed, at the request of the Applicant, to April 22, 2014. In the interim period, the Applicant has made some revisions to the floor plans, exterior elevations and building sections. The basic reason for this is to revise the Free Market Residential Unit so that the proposed addition to the existing roof level is now the Living/Dining/Kitchen for the unit and the existing upper level studio space is now two bedrooms with expanded bath/dressing areas. The stair access has been split into two stairways so that the Free Market Unit and Commercial uses do not share a common stairway. Also the exterior materials for the non-historic addition have been simplified due to the imminent redevelopment of the buildings on each side, which will cover up most of the east and west facades of the non-historic addition. The overall Floor Area (FAR) and Net Leasable/Net Livable Floor Areas are still in compliance with the provisions of the HPC Resolution and City Council Ordinance as documented herein. Please advise us if any additional documentation is required. Sincerely, Charles L. Cunniffe, AIA 619 Ea t Hvman F,�ru ti , a d n a16' B. 97 co x.6590 tax 970.925.5078 o11VIN c n n;;,e con, CITY OF ASPEN PRE-APPLICATION CONFERENCE SUMMARY PLANNER: Amy Simon, 970.429.2758 DATE: 4.16.14 PROJECT: 610 E. Hyman Avenue, Lot M, Block 99 REPRESENTATIVE: Charles Cunniffe Architects DESCRIPTION: 610 E. Hyman is a 3,000 square foot parcel in the C-1, Commercial Zone District. The mixed use building on the site was constructed in 1963. It currently includes commercial space in the basement and first floor, and a free-market unit on the second floor. An application for voluntary landmark designation/AspenModern negotiation, Conceptual Design Review and Conceptual Commercial Design Review was approved by HPC on October 24, 2012 (Resolution #27, Series of 2012) and City Council on January 14, 2013 (Ordinance #23, Series of 2012). Final design review is still required. Applicants typically must apply for Final review within one year of Conceptual approval, however this project was granted a six month extension to apply by April 22, 2014. HPC will conduct their reviews based on the land use code sections cited below and the relevant Historic Preservation and Commercial design guidelines. The application for Final review must be consistent with the plans approved conceptually, including the restoration plan, and must address conditions of approval established by HPC and Council, in particular the specific dimensional allowances detailed in the City Council ordinance, the specific language in the Council ordinance regarding shared Recycling and Trash Storage, and the HPC requirement that the height of the project may not exceed 38'. Relevant Land Use Code Section(s): 26.304 Common Development Review Procedures 26.412.040.4 Commercial Design Review, Final 26.412.070 Suggested Design Elements 26.415.070.D.4 Historic Preservation, Major Development, Final 26.575.020 Calculations and Measurements 26.710.150 C-1 Zone District Land Use Code: http://www.aspenpitkin.com/Departments/Community-Develor)ment/PIanninci and Zoning/Title 26 Land-Use-Code/ HPC Design Guidelines: http://www.aspeni)itkin.com/Departments/Community-Development/Historic Preservation/Historic Properties/ Commercial Design Guidelines: http://www.aspengitkin.com/Portals/0/docs/City/Comdev/Comm%2ODesgn%2OStnds/Commercial%2 ODesip QGuidelines Commercial%20Character%2OArea pdf { r HPC application: http://www.gWenpitkin-com/Portals/0/docs/City/Comdev/Apps%20and%20Fees/2011%20Historic%20L and%20Use%2OApP%20Form pdf Review by: Staff for completeness, HPC for determination Public Hearing: Yes Referral Agencies: Environmental Health Planning Fees: $1,950 for 6 billable hours (additional hours are billed at $325 per hour) Referral Agency Fees: $975 Total Deposit: $2,925 Total Number of Application Copies: 12 To apply, please submit 1 copy of: ❑ Signed fee agreement with payment. ❑ Applicant's name, address and telephone number in a letter signed by the applicant which states the name, address and telephone number of the representative authorized to act on behalf of the applicant. ❑ Street address and legal description of the parcel on which development is proposed to occur, consisting of a current certificate from a title insurance company, or attorney licensed to practice in the State of Colorado, listing the names of all owners of the property, and all mortgages, judgments, liens, easements, contracts and agreements affecting the parcel, and demonstrating the owner's right to apply for the Development Application. ❑ List of adjacent property owners within 300' for public hearing And 12 copies of: ❑ An 8 1/2" by 11" vicinity map locating the parcel within the City of Aspen. ❑ Site improvement survey including topography and vegetation showing the current status, including all easements and vacated rights of way, of the parcel certified by a registered land surveyor, licensed in the state of Colorado. ❑ Final drawings of all proposed structures(s) and/or addition(s) included as art of the development. The front elevation must be provided at 1/4" = 1.0' scale. p ❑ Landscape plan. ❑ An accurate representation of all major building materials to be used in the development, depicted through samples or photographs. ❑ A written description of the proposal and an explanation in written, graphic, or model form of how the proposed development complies with the review standards relevant to the development application. ❑ A statement, including narrative text or graphics, indicating how the final design conforms to representations made or stipulations placed as a condition of the approval of the conceptual design. Staff may request specific additional materials, including 3-D computer modeling. Applicants are advised that building plans will be required to meet the International Building Code as adopted by the City of Aspen, the Federal Fair Housing Act, and CRS 9.5.112. Please make sure that your application submittal addresses these building-related and accessibility regulations. You may contact the Building Department at 920-5090 for additional information. Disclaimer: The foregoing summary is advisory in nature only and is not binding on the City. The summary is based on current zoning, which is subject to change in the future, and upon factual representations that may or may not be accurate. The summary does not create a legal or vested right. TABLE OF CONTENTS ❑ EXHIBIT 1 -Letter of Authorization by Owner (1 copy) • EXHIBIT 2-Signed Agreement to Pay Form with Payment (1 copy) • EXHIBIT 3-Certificate of Title (1 copy) • EXHIBIT 4- List of Adjacent Property Owners (1 copy) • EXHIBIT 5- Resolution #27, Series of 2012, from the Aspen Preservation Commission (12 copies) • EXHIBIT 6-Ordinance #23, Series of 2012, from the Aspen City Council (12 copies) ❑ EXHIBIT 7-Vicinity Map (12 copies) • EXHIBIT 8-Site Improvement Survey (12 copies) • EXHIBIT 9-Land Use Application Form (12 copies) • EXHIBIT 10-Dimensional Requirements Form (12 copies) • EXHIBIT 11 -Project Description and Code Responses (12 copies) • EXHIBIT 12- Letter re: shared trash/recycle areas with 616 E. Hyman (12 copies) • EXHIBIT 13- FAR and Net Leasable/Net Livable Floor Plans &Tables (12 copies) • EXHIBIT 14- Final Architectural Plans and Renderings ❑ EXHIBIT 15-Cut Sheets of proposed major building materials (12 copies) / RECEPTION#: 593974,11/15/2012 at 10:21:43 O3, AM, EXHIBIT 5 1 OF 3, R $21.00 Doc Code RESOLUTION Janice K.Vos Caudill, Pitkin County, CO A RESOLUTION OF THE ASPEN HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION RECOMMENDING THE ASPEN CITY COUNCIL APPROVE HISTORIC LANDMARK DESIGNATION AND PRESERVATION BENEFITS THROUGH THE ASPENMODERN PROGRAM FOR THE PROPERTY LOCATED AT 610 E. HYMAN AVENUE,LOT M, BLOCK 99, CITY AND TOWNSITE OF ASPEN,COLORADO, AND GRANTING CONCEPTUAL MAJOR DEVELOPMENT AND COMMERCIAL DESIGN REVIEW APPROVAL RESOLUTION#27, SERIES OF 2012 PARCEL ID: 2737-182-12-004 WHEREAS, on March 28, 2012, the applicant, 610 E. Hyman LLC, Charles Cunniffe, represented by Haas Land Planning, requested that the property located at 610 E. Hyman Avenue, Lot M, Block 99, City and Townsite of Aspen, Colorado, be considered for voluntary historic designation in exchange for specific benefits through the AspenModern negotiation process as described at Section 26.415.025 and Section 26.415.030 of the Municipal Code; and WHEREAS, an AspenModern negotiation period ends 90 days after initiation unless extended by City Council. Council passed Resolution #53, Series of 2012 to extend this negotiation to December 23,2012; and WHEREAS, an AspenModern negotiation requires that the Historic Preservation Commission, using context papers and integrity scoring sheets for the property under consideration, provide Council with an assessment of the property's conformance with the designation criteria of Section 26.415.030.0.1. When any benefits that are not included in Section 26.415.110 are requested by the property owner, HPC shall also evaluate how the designation, and any development that is concurrently proposed, meets the policy objectives for the historic preservation program, as stated at Section 26.415.010, Purpose and Intent. As an additional measure of the appropriateness of designation and benefits, HPC shall determine whether the subject property is a "good, better, or best" example of Aspen's 201h century historic resources, referencing the scoring sheets and matrix adopted by City Council; and WHEREAS, concurrent with the designation application, Conceptual Major Development and Conceptual Commercial Design Review approval was requested for an expansion to the subject building; and WHEREAS, Section 26.415.070 of the Municipal Code states that "no building or structure shall be erected, constructed, enlarged, altered, repaired, relocated or improved involving a designated historic property or district until plans or sufficient information have been submitted to the Community Development Director and approved in accordance with the procedures established for their review;" and WHEREAS, for Conceptual Major Development Review, the HPC must review the application, a staff analysis report and the evidence presented at a hearing to determine the project's conformance with the City of Aspen Hi Preservation Dg Guidelines per 26.415.070.D.3.b.2 and 3 of the Municipal Code and other applicable Code ect on The HPC 610 E. Hyman Avenue-AspenModern HPC Resolution#27,Series of 2012 may approve, disapprove, approve with conditions or continue the application to obtain additional information necessary to make a decision to approve or deny; and WHEREAS, for Conceptual Commercial Design Review, the HPC must review the application, a staff analysis report and the evidence presented at a hearing to determine the project's conformance with the Commercial, Lodging, and Historic District Objectives and Guidelines per Section 26.412.040 of the Municipal Code. The HPC may approve, disapprove, approve with conditions or continue the application to obtain additional information necessary to make a decision to approve or deny; and WHEREAS, the proposed expansion project includes a parking waiver, which HPC may grant according to the review standards of Section 26.415.110.C, Benefits, of the Municipal Code; and WHEREAS, the proposed expansion project includes a reduction to the required Utility/Delivery and Trash Storage area, which HPC may grant based on the review standards of Section 26.430, Special Review; and WHEREAS, the proposed redevelopment includes a height increase, which HPC may grant according to the review standards of Section 26.412, Commercial Design Review, of the Municipal Code; and WHEREAS, Amy Guthrie, in her staff report to HPC dated October 24, 2012, performed an analysis of the application based on the standards. The staff recommendation was that the property should be designated a landmark as it meets the criteria for designation and the integrity score qualifies as the "better/best" category of historic resources. Staff recommended that the proposed incentives were not appropriate within the AspenModern program due to lack of adequate restoration work, and the project did not meet review standards related to Conceptual Design Review. Staff recommended denial of the project; and WHEREAS, at their regular meeting on October 24, 2012, the Historic Preservation Commission considered the application during a duly noticed public hearing, the staff memo and recommendation, and public comments, and recommended Council pursue negotiation for landmark designation for this "better/best" example of an AspenModern resource, with conditions. HPC approved Conceptual Major Development and Conceptual Commercial Design with conditions. The vote of the members was 3 to 1. NOW,THEREFORE,BE IT RESOLVED: That HPC hereby finds that the property located at 610 E. Hyman Avenue,Lot M, Block 99, City and Townsite of Aspen, meets the designation criteria of Land Use Code Section 26.415.030.C.1. HPC supports Council negotiation for voluntary designation of this property only with the condition that the applicant is required to restore the original arched form of the ground floor windows. This restoration work is considered necessary to support a package of preservation incentives which include the following: 1. A free market residential floor area increase of 1,546 square feet, making the total free market floor area 3,046 square feet. The combination of the commercial floor area and 610 E.Hyman Avenue—AspenModem HPC Resolution#27,Series of 2012 r a the residential free market floor area will exceed what is allowed as a total development for the site by 692 square feet. 2. 10 years vested rights. 3. Growth Management affordable housing mitigation waiver for the 1.725 employees generated by the proposed 949 square feet of new net leasable space. (This waiver is available in the Municipal Code for all historic landmarks) 4. On-site parking waiver, and waiver of cash-in-lieu fee for the required 0.95 parking spaces generated by the proposed 949 square feet of new net leasable space. (This waiver is available in the Municipal Code for all historic landmarks) 5. Park Development and Transportation Demand Management mitigation fees generated by residential and commercial expansion. (This waiver is available in the Municipal Code for all historic landmarks) HPC hereby grants Conceptual Major Development and Conceptual Commercial Design Review approval with the following conditions: 1. HPC approves a full waiver of the required on-site Utility, Delivery and Trash Storage Area with the condition that the applicant provides City Council with an acceptable written agreement for shared Trash Storage area amongst adjacent property owner(s) on Block 99, City and Townsite of Aspen. 2. The applicant must restudy the design of the new addition so the project does not exceed a maximum height of 38'. APPROVED BY THE COMMISSION at its regular meeting on the 24th day of October, 2012. ay aytin,Vice Chair Approved as to Form: Debbie Quinn, Assistant City Attorney ATTEST: Kathy Strick and, Chief Deputy Clerk 610 E. Hyman Avenue—AspenModem HPC Resolution#27,Series of 2012 RECEPTION#: 597479, 03/06/2013 at 10:09:49 AM, 1 OF 5, R $31.00 Doc Code ORDINANCE ORDINANCE #23 .Janice K.Vos Caudill, Pitkin County, CO (Series of 2012) EXHIBIT 6 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ASPEN,COLORADO APPROVING HISTORIC LANDMARK DESIGNATION AND BENEFITS THROUGH THE ASPENMODERN PROGRAM FOR THE PROPERTY LOCATED AT 610 E. HYMAN AVENUE,LOT M,BLOCK 99, CITY AND TOWNSITE OF ASPEN, COLORADO PARCEL ID: 2737-182-12-004 WHEREAS, the applicant, 610 E. Hyman LLC, represented by Haas Land Planning, submitted an application on March 28, 2012, pursuant to Section 26.415.025(C),AspenModern Properties, of the Aspen Municipal Code, to voluntarily participate in the AspenModern ninety-day negotiation period for the property located at 610 E. Hyman Avenue, Lot M, Block 99, City and Townsite of Aspen; and WHEREAS, an AspenModern negotiation period ends 90 days after initiation unless extended by City Council. Council passed Resolution #119, Series of 2012 to extend this negotiation to February 21, 2013; and WHEREAS, Municipal Code Section 26.415.025.C(1)(b) states that, during the negotiation period, "the Community Development Director shall confer with the Historic Preservation Commission, during a public meeting, regarding the proposed building'permit and the nature of the property. The property owner shall be provided notice of this meeting;" and WHEREAS, the property owner and representative met with the Historic Preservation Commission on May 23, 2012 and October 24, 2012; and WHEREAS, at their regular meeting on October 24, 2012, the HPC considered the designation and proposed development, found that 610 E. Hyman Avenue is a "betteribest" example of the Modern style in Aspen, and found that the policy objectives for the historic preservation program stated at Section 26.415.010, Purpose and Intent are met. HPC recommended City Council ("Council") approval of Historic Landmark Designation and negotiation with conditions; and WHEREAS, Section 26.415.025.C(1)(d), states that, during the negotiation period, "council may negotiate directly with the property owner or may choose to direct the Community Development Director, or other City staff as necessary, to negotiate with the property owner to reach a mutually acceptable agreement for the designation of the property"; and WHEREAS, Section 26.415.025.C(1)d establishes that "as part of the mutually acceptable agreement, the City Council may, at its sole discretion, approve any land use entitlement or fee waiver permitted by the Municipal Code and may award any approval that is assigned to another Board or Commission, including variations;" and Ordinance#23, Series of 2012 610 E. Hyman, AspenModern Negotation Page 1 of 5 WHEREAS, in addition to Historic Landmark Designation and benefits available to Landmarked properties subject to the Aspen Municipal Code, the applicant has identified preservation incentives that are requested as part of the AspenModern negotiation process; and WHEREAS, the Community Development Department performed an analysis of the application for Landmark Designation and found that the review standards are met, with conditions. The staff report analyzed the proposed preservation incentives and monetary value of the benefits where possible; and WHEREAS, the City Council finds that the proposal meets or exceeds all applicable development standards and that the approval of the development proposal is consistent with the goals and elements of the Aspen Area Community Plan; and, WHEREAS, the City Council finds that this Ordinance furthers and is necessary for the promotion of public health, safety, and welfare. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ASPEN,COLORADO,AS FOLLOWS: Section 1: Historic Landmark Designation Pursuant to the procedures and standards set forth in Title 26 of the Aspen Municipal Code, the City Council hereby approves Historic Designation for 610 E. Hyman Avenue,Lot M, Block 99, City and Townsite of Aspen subject to the conditions described herein. The property owner shall have thirty (30) days from the date of adoption of this Ordinance to provide the City with written agreement to voluntary historic landmark designation and acceptance of the terms of this Ordinance. Otherwise, the Ordinance shall be considered null and void in its entirety. Upon the effective date of this ordinance, the City.Clerk shall record with the real estate records of the Clerk and Recorder of the County, a certified copy of this ordinance. The location of the historic landmark property designated by this ordinance shall be indicated on the official maps of the City that are maintained by the Community Development Department. Section 2• Aspen Modern Negotiation Pursuant to the procedures and standards set forth in Title 26 of the Aspen Municipal Code, the City Council hereby approves the following, with the conditions that the applicant is required to restore the building as represented in Exhibit F of the January 14, 2013 Council packet, and the applicant is required to pay Park Development Impact Fees and Transportation Demand Impact Fees for the proposed expansion. 1. A free market residential floor area increase of 1,546 square feet, making the total free market floor area 3,046 square feet. The combination of the commercial floor area and the residential free market floor area will exceed what is allowed as a total development for the site by 692 square feet, and Ordinance#23, Series of 2012 610 E.Hyman, AspenModern Negotation Page 2 of 5 2. Waiver of the fraction of a parking space and the cash-in-lieu payment generated by the proposed expansion; and 3. Waiver of the on-site Utility/Trash/Recycling requirement generated by the proposed expansion based on a satisfactory written agreement to share Recycling and Trash Storage area with the property directly to the west (616 E. Hyman). A binding, recorded agreement, shall be reviewed and approved by the City Attorney's Office, detailing how the shared arrangement will function, including the size and type of trash and recycling bins that will be provided, how users of both buildings will have unlimited access to the facilities, and which waste hauler will provide services. In addition, there shall be a plan provided for exact placement and size of trash and recycling containers for both the 610 E. Hyman property and the 616 E. Hyman property, to be reviewed and approved by the Environmental Health Department; and 4. Waiver of mitigation for 20% of the 1.725 FTE (full-time equivalent) employees generated by the proposed expansion. A cash in lieu fee of$195,000, which is a 20% reduction of the mitigation calculation at the time of this Ordinance, shall be paid upon issuance of a building permit, in full satisfaction of all housing mitigation requirements for the final site specific development plan for the expansion project. Additionally the amount of the fee shall be adjusted based on the percentage change in the Consumer Price Index (CPI), all urban consumers, from the date of this approval to the date that the fee is paid. The applicant shall also have the option (rather than making the cash in lieu fee payment of$195,000 as set forth above) of mitigating for 1.38 (1.725 x 80%) FTEs by providing buy down units or Certificates of Affordable Housing Credit according to the requirements of the Municipal Code in place at the time of building permit application, in fall satisfaction of all housing mitigation requirements for the final site specific development plan for the expansion project. Section 3:Vested Rights The development approvals granted herein shall constitute a site-specific development plan and a vested property right attaching to and running with the Subject Property and shall confer upon the Applicant the right to undertake and complete the site specific development plan and use of said property under the terms and conditions of the site specific development plan including any approved amendments thereto. The vesting period of these vested property rights shall be for five (5) years which shall not begin to run until the date of the publications required to be made as set forth below. However, any failure to abide by any of the terms and conditions attendant to this approval shall result in the forfeiture of said vested property rights. Unless otherwise exempted or extended, failure to properly record all plats and agreements required to be recorded, as specified herein, within 180 days of the effective date of the development order shall also result in the forfeiture of said vested property rights and shall render the development order void within the meaning of§ 26.104.050, Void Permits. Zoning that is not part of the approved site-specific development plan shall not result in the creation of a vested property right. Ordinance#23, Series of 2012 610 E.Hyman, AspenModern Negotation Page 3 of 5 x No later than fourteen (14) days following final approval by the Historic Preservation Commission, the City Clerk shall cause to be published in a newspaper of general circulation within the jurisdictional boundaries of the City of Aspen, a notice advising the general public of the approval of a site specific development plan and creation of a vested property right pursuant to Chapter 26.308, Vested Property Rights. Pursuant to § 26.304.070(A), Development Orders, such notice shall be substantially in the following form: Notice is hereby given to the general public of the approval of a site specific development plan, and the creation of a vested property right, valid for a period of five (5) years, pursuant to the Land Use Code of the City of Aspen and Title 24, Article 68, Colorado Revised Statutes, pertaining to the following described property: 610 E. Hyman Avenue,Lot M, Block 99, City and Townsite of Aspen. Nothing in this approval shall exempt the Development Order from subsequent reviews and approvals required by this Ordinance of the general rules, regulations and ordinances or the City of Aspen provided that such reviews and approvals are not inconsistent with this Ordinance. The vested rights granted hereby shall be subject to all rights of referendum and judicial review. The period of time permitted by law to exercise the right of referendum to refer to the electorate this Section of this Ordinance granting vested rights; or, to seek judicial review of the grant of vested rights shall not begin to run until the date of publication of the notice of final development approval as set forth above. The rights of referendum described herein shall be no greater than those set forth in the Colorado Constitution and the Aspen Home Rule Charter. Section 4• Material Representations All material representations and commitments made by the Applicant pursuant to the development proposal approvals as herein awarded, whether in public hearing or documentation presented before the Historic Preservation Commission or City Council, are hereby incorporated in such plan development approvals and the same shall be complied with as if fully set forth herein, unless amended by an authorized entity. Section 5: Litip-ation This ordinance shall not affect any existing litigation and shall not operate as an abatement of any action or proceeding now pending under or by virtue of the ordinances repealed or amended as herein provided,and the same shall be conducted and concluded under such prior ordinances. Section 6: Severabiti If any section, subsection, sentence, clause, phrase, or portion of this ordinance is for any reason held invalid or unconstitutional in a court of competent jurisdiction, such portion shall be deemed a separate, distinct and independent provision and shall not affect the validity of the remaining portions thereof The City Clerk is directed, upon the adoption of this ordinance, to record a copy of this ordinance in the office of the Pitkin County Clerk and Recorder. Ordinance#23, Series of 2012 610 E.Hyman, AsperA4odem Negotation Page 4of5 Section 7: Public Hearin A public hearing on the ordinance shall be held on the 10th day of December, 2012 in the City Council Chambers, Aspen City Hall, Aspen, Colorado, fifteen (15) days prior to which hearing a public notice of the same was published in a newspaper of general circulation within the City of Aspen. INTRODUCED, READ AND ORDERED PUBLISHED as provided by law, by the City Council of the City of Aspen on the 12th day of November,2012. Michael C. eland, Ma or ATTEST: o KochArty lerk FINALLY,adopted,passed and approved this 1�day e� , 2013. Michael C. Ireland, Ma or ATT ST: '4ek - - - - - - - - - - - - Kathryn Koch,, t Clerk APPROVED AS TO FORM: James R. True, City Attorney Ordinance#23, Series of 2012 610 E. Hyman, AspenModern Negotation Page 5 of 5 EXHIBIT 7 LP MU u PUB)*` r_ UB #' ` *gar + ° p F r, r --Q (0 at A - L X , PUD r t z�co E r DrafnlTrans � g LP JD T -� PUB . ' VE y RJMF PUD.�' cP Pu c L R/M F NC f i «g ' 07r PUD VICINITY MAP 610 E. H YMA N AVE. a■ ©Q ASPEN, COLORADO FINAL HPC CHARLES CUNNIFFE 22 APRIL 2014 ARCHITECTS EXH I BIT 8 LEGEND AND NOTES O FOUND OR SET SURVEY MONUMENT AS DESCRIBED 10 ❑ UTILITY BOX 10 2p 0 SURVEY CONTROL TITLE INFORMATION FURNISHED BY: PITKfN COUNTY TITLE.-INC, SURVEY FOOT EFFECTIVE PC DATE4I MARCH 7. 2012 BEARINGS BASED ON THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF BLOCK 94 191841 AND THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF BLOCK 99 191841 (N 75.09"If'W) ® - --9 METAL FENCE ® MANHOLE POSTED ADDRESS '610 EAST HYMAN AVENUE' 16'29 y O 1209 8 99 S R PAVED _p.W 1 DISK PAVED PARKING 2594T S 7S'09. f 30 p1 SE' 25947 H i CARPORT / GARAGE PAVED PARKING o CON, J / LOT L CpH EREp l BUILDING CW / EONCROA/HE5 / STAIRy C l STAIRS / C / C01"VAR& BUILDING / PP FR / / EVEL � 13 OECKB � 9 V (( o BUILDING I � C)9184. SOUTHEAST CORNER BLOCK 94 a / BUILDING CERTIFICATION Rg THE UNDERS D STATES THAT THE PROPERTY DESCRIBED HEREON WAS FIELD SURVEYED 3 DURING ¢.AND IS ACCURATE BASED ON THE FIELD EVIDENDE AS SHOWN. AND TH T THERE ARE NO DISCREPANCIES OF RECORD. BOUNDARY LINE NE CONFLICTS. / ENCROACiWeENTS. EABEMEN iB OR RIGHTS OF WAY IN FIELD EVIDENCE-OR KNOWN TO LI HE ANDEPT KS F SHOWN UNDERGROUND UTILITIES WITH NO ABOVEGROUND APPURTENANCES, CORD NOT SUPPLIED TO THE SUR YEYOR ARE E%CEPTED. THIS SURVEY CONC PA 18 V boa TAMPED WITH THE SEAL OF THE SURVEYOR BELOW. '%' ON / T 0 / D 7 3E`"' PAVERS BUILDING ON PROPERTY LINE JO 25947 BUILDING ENCROACHES '}� Behr 3 0.1' •/- M 0.p � xa RE CpNC EIL DOW (ANDSCA'ED AREA / 25947 N ".p9. CONIC / CONC WACt 30 I18483W Ary 80 06 / OSC / A,Pfp AR BACK pf CUPS CAQ 9i89 SOUTHEAST CORNER BLOCK 99 HORIZONTAL CONTROL Y ffl v N '98p RECOp"D Up IMPROVEMENT SURVEY OF LOT M. BLOCK 99. CITY AND TOWNSITE OF ASPEN CITY OF ASPEN. COUNTY OF PITKIN STATE OF COLORADO AREA: 3.001 SO FT x" 0.069 ACRES . PREPARED BY ASPEN SURVEY ENGINEERS. INC. peel ND To coLpeMO Lnr Yw MufT CMTENw nNr LEWt 210 SOUTH GALENA STREET p OPON AlW DEFECT oN TN19 PLAT WIiNIK THREE YEARS left D(fCOVER 9UCN DEFECT tM ND EVENT MY ANY ACTION ASPEN, COLORADO 81611 INY DEFECT 1.TN19 PIT BH COMEW6D MDIIE TNAX TFN (( t PHONE/FAX 19701 925-3816 DHE I]AV01DP 1F%T�iIET,IS-_�ItMRT�gEµOFFTNE DATE JOB 1/14 21002C EXHIBIT 9 ATTACHMENT 2 -Historic Preservation Land Use Application PROJECT: Name: Location: Co 10 E. wt &Wttp Ae7 p�iaue_ aNd'7'ouy� (Indicate street address,lot&bl k number or metes and bounds description of property) Parcel ID# (REQUIRED) 273 7-1$Z-IZ -00,+ APPLICANT: Name: (p CJ 3 LLB. 4-/d G In&HMro C.Q V X i Address: lo10 E wt-&4 Avdnur As, e4A Co N011 Phone#: q7D- Z5-5',590 Fax#:4"0- *Z>�i- E-mail: G it-le;* WA REPRESENTATIVE: f _ Name: -J$Y1d'0"' �irr l 4v� pr--P3 r! o W[.Z Address: Jc��vtnr Hn. Phone#: q t9-qZS-5580 Fax#: 11Zc9-gZ5-G07& E-mail:briar<w(3cctnH� .corm TYPE OF APPLICATION: lease check all that apply): Ig Historic Designation ❑ Relocation(temporary,on ❑ Certificate of No Negative Effect ❑ or off-site) ❑ Certificate of Appropriateness ❑ Demolition(total ❑ -Minor Historic Development demolition) JK -Major Historic Development ❑ Historic Landmark Lot Split ❑ -Conceptual Historic Development -Final Historic Development -Substantial Amendment EXISTING CONDITIONS: (description of existing buildings,uses,previous approvals,etc. I(it_$ri*kynn Jei !O w 2!&01" mi-k tj mef,6al(dinn (1g43> w,'flA a V)OA 1t'y�o ga'r_ P/C,ar f 7 o'r+ ok 4kA,aU 5)d L, )D u i f-{-iiA 20051. PROPOSAL: (description of proposed buildings,uses,modifications,etc. L aKJ w►ark-Lee i n i' o a,kd a r mogt co�yis�in� a-Fwo-��orvl a dd��t a Fx,�tt. {-IZ A ova-ht�+vri c ffa B1GSrP0r+ Aspen Historic Preservation Land Use Application Requirements,Updated:May 29,2007 EXHIBIT 10 ATTACHMENT 3- Dimensional Requirements Form (Item#10 on the submittal requirements key. Not necessary for all projects.) Project: ((n f-,4 wt -1-MajorT�v,elnam�,vlf Applicant: G L06Z.H-Y►wtati,L-LG e-,100 aYqQE4p C(4AA) Project Location: Cold R, y► AV�nt{lL, 14*�dMt Cd Zone District: G Lot Size: S"000 5�.. . Lot Area: %Vcc 54s �+' (For the purposes of calculating Floor Area,Lot Area may be reduced for areas within the high water mark, easements,and steep slopes.Please refer to the definition of Lot Area in the Municipal Code.) Commercial net leasable: Existing: '21-715 9propose& 4j7 1 15� �f Number of residential units: Existing: I Proposed.• Number of bedrooms: Existing: oposed: 2 *'Dwa-b LUC, �vnatidv►t�kt're�irw� Priu+space+c,. coun4vA Proposed%of demolition: T0,V DIMENSIONS: (write n/a where no requirement exists in the zone district) Floor Area: Existing:!`'4,d7l 4 Allowable:2,0 Proposed: 6,/&w s g Principal Bldg.: Existing: llowable:3Cv Proposed: 38 (40 For. E�Ifwzr6r) Accessory Bldg.: Existing: P/.A Allowable:N'/A Proposed: NIA On-Site parking: Existing: 3 Required: Z,7 Proposed: 3 • Site coverage: Existing: 90% Required: N/A Proposed: NoCN-ail ► •Open Space: Existing: t Required: N/A Proposed: Front Setback: Existing:10 Required.• WA Proposed:tinCkarK 9, Rear Setback: Existing: 9 oh L Required: NIA Proposed: No CIW46 Combined Front/Rear: Indicate N, S,E,W Existing: WA Required: N/A Proposed.• W^ Side Setback: Existing: N/Qr Required: NIA Proposed: KIA Side Setback: Existing: N/A Required: N/A Proposed: WA Combined Sides: Existing: N/Ac Required.• WA Proposed: N/A Distance between Existing: N/A Required: WA Proposed: 14 'A buildings: Existing non-conformities or encroachments and note if encroachment licenses have been issued: NOIA Variations requested(identify the exact variances needed): .J J i�roh a l CovK�e al awcl Frame. Mark�-F i�isi ev► al �, z �JP�-LeaSab)e Ne va (.Aid Aspen Historic Preservation Land Use Application Requirements,Updated:May 29,2007 EXHIBIT 11 Date: April 22, 2014 Project: 610 E. Hyman Avenue, Aspen, CO 81611 Legal Description: Lot M, Block 99, City and Townsite of Aspen, P.I.D. #2737-182-12-004 Project Description: This HPC Final Design Review for Voluntary Landmark Designation/Aspen Modern Negotiation anticipates partial demolition of the non-historical rear portion of the existing building to accommodate the proposed two-story addition over the garage and interior remodeling. An elevator will be added to make the building ADA compliant. The Upper Level will be additional commercial space, plus remodeling of the existing studio apartment into two bedrooms with expanded bath/dressing areas. The Existing Roof Level will be a new Living/Dining/Kitchen to create a more livable Free Market Residential Unit. The existing stairway will be replaced by two independent stairways that surround the elevator and utilize the existing courtyard, thus providing private access to the two primary uses. The Recycling/Trash Storage Area agreement with 616 E. Hyman Avenue is in place and the height of the Rooftop addition is limited to 38 feet relative to the Hyman Avenue sidewalk and alley grades. The Free Market Residential Unit total floor area, including non-unit and deck area, is now 3,045,7 sq. ff„ which is within the conceptual approval of 3,046 sq, ff. The combination of commercial floor area and residential floor area is now 688.3 sq. ff. over what is allowed over the total development for the site, which is within the conceptual approval of 692 sq. ft. Following is our response to the requirements of the City of Aspen Historic Preservation Guidelines, Chapters 1 through 11. Chapter 1:Streetscape and Lot Features 1.11 Preserve and maintain mature landscaping on site, particularly landmark trees and shrubs. Response: The very large cottonwood tree on the parkway and the very large spruce tree in the open space facing the street will be preserved and maintained. The only other planting is in the annual flowers in the light well in the open space and flanking the entry doors. 1.13 Revisions or additions to the landscape should be consistent with the historic context of the site. Response: A rooftop garden is proposed to be added on the existing roof as part of the new deck for the addition. Page 1 of 5 Site Lighting 1.15 Minimize the visual impacts of site lighting. Response: No site lighting is being proposed. Chapter 2: Historic Building Materials Treatment of Materials 2.1 Preserve original building materials Response: The original red brick and stucco will be maintained and the stucco color will be returned to the original white as required by the HPC. 2.2 Protect wood features from deterioration. Response: Not applicable 2.4 Brick or stone that was not painted historically should not be painted. Response: The existing historic brick fapade will be preserved. Repair of Materials 2.6 Maintain masonry walls in good condition. Response: The original mortar will be preserved and repaired as needed. Chapter 3: Windows Treatment of Windows 3.1 Preserve the functional and decorative features of a historic window. Response: The windows on the historic fapade have been replaced and modified by a previous remodeling, which have been approved by HPC on the conceptual review. They are bronze aluminum clad wood windows. 3.2 Preserve the position, number and arrangement of historic windows in a building wall. Response: See note above. Energy Conservation 3.8 Use a storm window to enhance energy conservation rather than to replace a historic window. Response: The existing historic fapade windows have insulating glass. Page 2 of 5 Chapter 4: Doors Treatment of Existing Doors 4.1 Preserve historically significant doors. Response: The entry doors in the historic fapade were replaced in a previous remodeling, which has been approved in the HPC Conceptual Review. Energy Conservation 4.6 If energy conservation and heat loss are concerns, consider using a storm door instead of replacing a historic entry door. Response: The existing replacement doors have insulating glass. Chapter 6: Architectural Details Treatment of Architectural Features 6.1 Preserve significant architectural features. Response: The original arched openings at the Upper Level of the historic street fapade will be preserved as well as the original red brick veneer. 6.4 Repair or replacement of missing or deteriorated features should be based on original designs. Response: The arched windows at the middle level of the street fapade, which were part of the original building design, were replaced by rectangular windows in 2001. These will be removed and the arched windows will be put back as required by the HPC Conceptual Approval. The stucco around the windows will be repaired and all stucco will be returned to the original white color. Chapter 7: Roofs Treatment of Roofs 7.1 Preserve the original form of a roof. Response: The original roof is flat and is set behind the brick and stucco arcade. The proposed addition will preserve the portion toward the street and the back portion will become a deck for the proposed roof top addition as shown on the drawings. 7.3. Minimize the visual impacts of skylights and other rooftop devices. Response: The tilted portion of the roof for the proposed roof top addition will screen the skylight, elevator penthouse and mechanical equipment fence from view at the street level. Page 3 of 5 Materials 7.8 Preserve original roof materials. Response: The original flat roof on the forward portion is a built-up system that has been upgraded and is not visible from the street level. 7.9 New or replacement roof materials should convey a scale, color and texture similar to those used traditionally. Response: The proposed roof for the rooftop addition, at the back half of the lot, will be a membrane roof material which will not be visible from street level. Chapter 10: Building Additions New Additions 10.3 Design a new addition such that one's ability to interpret the historic character of the primary building is maintained. Response: The proposed addition is at the rear of the lot and will be easily distinguishable from the historic building. Much of the lower floors will eventually be covered by the redevelopment of the adjacent properties. 10.4 Design a new addition to be recognized as a produce of its own time. Response: The proposed addition will definitely be recognizable as a contemporary design. 10.7 If it is necessary to design an addition that is taller than a historic building, set it back substantially from significant facades and use a "connector" to link it to the historic building. Response: The proposed rooftop portion of the addition is in compliance with the Aspen LUC and C-1 Zone District and is at the rear half of the site. 10.8 Place an addition at the rear of a building or set it back from the front to minimize the visual impact on the historic structure and to allow the original proportions and character to remain prominent. Response: See note above. 10.11 On a new addition, use exterior materials that are compatible with the historic materials of the primary building. Response: The new addition will use stucco that matches the historic street fapade, but will use C.M.U. painted a neutral gray color to be subordinate to the original red brick, The roof fascia and window/door frames will be dark bronze to match the street fapade. Page 4 of 5 Rooftop Additions 10.12 When constructing a rooftop addition, keep the mass and scale subordinate to that of historic building. Response: As stated above, the rooftop addition will be at the rear of the lot and will not compete with the historic street fapade, 10.13 Set a rooftop addition back from the front of the building. Response: See note above. Chapter 11: New Buildings on Landmarked Properties Architectural Details 11.9 Use building components that are similar in size and shape to those of the historic property. Response: The building components of the proposed addition are not intended to emulate the historic building, but be subordinate and distinguishable from it. Page 5 of 5 EXHIBIT 12 u Ifco Ltd. 610 Fast Hyman,Aspen,Colorado 8 16 11 -(970)925-2490 Marlin Ffug Chairman November 30, 2012 Amy Guthrie 130 S Galena Street Aspen,CO 81611 Re: Trash/Recycling Agreement for 616 E.Hyman Avenue and 610 E, Hyman Avenue, Aspen, Colorado 81611 Dear Amy, This letter is to confirm that the Owners of 616 E.Hyman Avenue and 610 E. Hyman Avenue have a cooperative agreement for their trash and recycling services. The trash receptacle is behind 616 E.Hyman Ave.; this trash service Is shared with 610 E. Hyman Ave. The recycling bins are behind 610 E.Hyman Ave,; the recycling services is shared with 616 E. Hyman Ave. Please lei us know if you require additional information. Sincerely, Steven Ferrell Gulfco,ltd. 1. . . . . 1• . , ' � „�>,,,.,/.\ �\� \�\ \ _ i_� 0 y�� irfiirrrrfrrri.MIN IN, C1 CA ,gnknmes MON► ► ► ► ► ► ► - \\ '\\\1 \\1\\ OWN • 11 I$Sa�\a\\I.�1\-�♦, \'� \ \'�•\` \\`\\M� ` L"-•.�% %'�r' a, NIS\ WIWI /\. ��� � /� \ \ �\ 11111 111 �\ l ti ,./ 1 - ,� � ,, 1111 00 .��. \ 1 A 1 >11 ••'1 mi \ \ - I\\\ �� - \\il - - - ►e y_n .1 ail __ _� •\ \ >\ \ � \\\ ► \1 \ 1 ► 1. \1 .a . \1 I• ► ► . 1 r. ��1.\\ % i�Ltiyyv iG .�\ / /nom // / .:.:.;.;:;:;.•; : 11-1 In 11 IN NMI _ / NOW, e./�. � / 1 \'.���1----- ►. X1'171 - _ �I 10/110 /% % 1 / I \���1�� •�//.�-�I is// �'/g �������:'1 - ���. ��I�� �'�/ / i, iii/�/�r, •• •••'•. — ■ ____ _.�.—.- _._//���. �U////. .. iii!"%////.d�•ee:•.•.❖:_ • .1 MEMO MEE MM E m OEM o m1IIIM' . RESIDENTIAL NET LIVABLE AREA 40.1 S.F I I 6 EXISiIN6 EXISTING I DARPORT - 0 1 I I l�el I I II I I I �I I i www.cunniffe.com I I MAIN LEVEL PLAN ROOF /SITE PLAN - LOT M v I I U II W RE SID CKIA 011E •III orEN LJ_ COM CEILING 16 ABOVE o LOMMEROIAL STORAGE / RESIDENTIAL DECK ° • LL w F it II z Z o w Cn a W w 2 LOWER LEVEL PLAN ��1 ROOF LEVEL PLAN _ 2 U � 0 E LLI RESIDENTIAL DECK 0 o Z UNEXGAVATED cl ffi J W D Z 0 a m >O Z a4� Q Q O O 2 co a co BASEMENT LEVEL PLAN UPPER LEVEL PLAN 1:0 C)Q " /B1' o 4 r-0° LW 0 LEGEND coo DRAWING NET LEA5ABLE/NET LIVABLE ..E ISSUE: DATE RNAL HPC 04122/14 PROPOSED NET LEASABLE / LIVABLE AREA JOB NO. 0832 Commerical Residential Commercial FAR/Residential Net Livable Net Leasable Livable Net Leasable Net Livable Basement S.F. 910.1 0.0 526.2+1,581.5+969.3= 3,063.4 3,063.4> 1,999,4 SHEET NO Lower Level S.F. 1,364.6 0.0 1,999.4 1,999.4 Main Level S.F. 1,471.0 40.1 Upper Level S.F. 977.8 1,044.8 AD Roof Level S.F. 0.0 914.5 Total 4,723.5 1,999.4 e pYgYiHI[H NLFS N IFff ANOIRECt EXHIBIT 14 ALLEY E3LOC,K w .cunniffe.com EXISTING GARAGE U) H U w LL EXISTING = IF GARFORT Q W EXISTING I LPL LISHTWEL I z z g I� ::D U) < LU < EXISTING OFFICE Q Z BUILDING 2 U T LOT K LOT L LOT M LOT N C7 _z C) _J w D z z m >o z a� Q Qo wINOOw o0 WELL = Z _ cn a U �¢ 6' GONGRET W LK w 70 O DRAWING: EXISTINS SITE PLAN EH�,/ ,} j� ^ \ / }� ISSUE DATE . T f M A N A V E V J E FINAL HPC 04/22114 JOB NO. 0832 NORTH NORTH SHEET NO. EXISTING SITE PLAN �8.. - All D GPYAI6HT MARIES NN IRE AREHITEETS D o� i N N X y Z II 1/B -5 I/8" y O 5' 3/4" 3'-6 9/I6" 3'-3 I/16" y �N D = m P y - J] O JJ � O O _ 0 z X D D O A� a A= c O a W � m o � m z m ------ 0 r -o z A I 610 EAST HYMAN BUILDING CHARLES CUNNIFFE ARCHITECTS c N m m 610 EAST HYMAN AVENUE NASPEN,COLORADO 610 EAST HYMAN AVE. I ASPEN,CO 81611 I TEL 970.925.5590 I FAX:970.920.4557 m 3 0 www.cunniffe.com U) w LL -- — -- — - It�I rr EAT STAIR Z�N E/V ' �\I O I,A\I III u� w pN �I LL IFE9 ___ tu- I - II F< _ z i it O Z) a- XV W a _ ——— LL a BASEMENT n , ^\I A j <' .f 4'-O" 3'-6 B/B"^Y 3'-4 1,8' 4'-b E/H BELOW WEST STAIR 3-n sa 5 I/2 3 V] E/B" < WELL I H ALIGN NEW WALL U WITH EXISTING EXISTING OFFICE ❑ up ON e o __ I II II II I II I I I I I I COATS ro I` - - - -- y PILL OPENING 1---=J I—_ _J ______J %L A ul EXISTING MECH — DA TqI m Q ^�I\` HANDLER HANDLER HANDLER W ILL�YLL^YI z o w A f m > � -- -------------- Z o =U LLI U)< CL co U) wR W co CO aO'-a. DRAWING: LOWER LEVEL PLAN ISSUE: DATE FINAL HPC 04122114 JOB NO 0832 PLAN LOWER LEVEL PLAN SHEET NO. rvORTH T/4-- 1_0 NOREH 01 4 e A2.2 [0PYRICHT NAALES(UNNIFFE ARMTECTS a Q I www.cu nniffe.com I W � RESIDENTIAL SlAll — UP ylv Q CLOSE O III,\ A LL F- LL 5 " 3- I/4 '-33/8 ' " z EXISTING GARAGE crc as E V OR a 4'-1— V J III _ —I W w ALIGN NEW WALL 2 F WEST STAIR w1rN Exlsnrve �i U 3-4 vb' a'-a" P'-b 5/4- 3'-1 v4' 3'-P 1,2' EXISTING OFFICE P DN OOVNTER 1 UPPERS COATS II II III Dw ENLARGED KITCHEN-COPY RM EXISTING CARPORT I I — DA Tqt II REF / DN p w II N L— —— — — —— LL nEGF1 GNASE < � Q A � m Z - z a 2a = U = N a U) '� a W y DRAWING: 2 U MAIN 4 GARAGE 1 LEVEL PLAN ISSUE DATE FINAL HPC 04127/14 JOB NO. 0832 PLAN MAIN & GARAGE LEVEL PLAN SHEET NO. NORTH NR E I/4" - V-0.. ORTH 4 e A2.3 OAYAI6Ni[XAALES[U IFFE AAENIlER$ www.cunniffe.com 5'-5 3/4" 51 518" 3'-4 5/5' 11-a 1/I6 _ rF— T 1—I I DRESSIN 1 11°7Y LL 6A 1O E D N AL S AI LL OFFICE #1 uP Z m GUEST BEDROOM EXISTING DECK z o BATH U a m m II E V OR a / A � ui C ST RAGE HALLWAY EPA\\ DN MASTER BEDROOM OFFICE #2 MASTER BATH o MASTER DRESSING V m m m Z m 'I-I I/, WEST STAIR n m _J Lu 40 HAS LU > LL v Q 2 20 =U N d W Q Q co W CD DRAWING: 2 VPPER LEVEL PLAN ISSUE: DATE FINAL HPC 04/22/14 JOB NO. 0832 PLAN UPPER LEVEL PLAN SHEET NO. NoRrH 0- R E /4" o.. NDRTH r%mmomommm""I 4 e A2.4 [ PYRILHi CNAALES[ IFFE AR[IMLECiS Q2 I www.cunniffe.com I c.1) � I I ~ W ' 0'-B" 4'-4 B/4 II'-O I/O' 9'•4 S/D 5'-O" I w&E PANTRY W I I I-10• SINK REF /uuIIVI/ � S I/�n 3�+ 6-IIS I/3" 5 1/Z' � I I II I I I S� ' L1E D AI NORH DECK BREAKFAST ROOM KITCHEN OT BgpY oPE ro 4-I-l0 WDER R E OR Lu SOLITH DECK LEvATED RO 1/4 5-5" 4-1 1/5 1/4' 4 A -j DINING ROOM LIVNG ROOM 6AS W y Q�� APPLIANCE w 4®O 1 1 9 D Z o A m > a �o =U U o Q w CD O DRAWING: 2 ROOF LEVEL PLAN L ISSUE T DATE FINAL HPC 04121114 "ND. 0832 TM 'EXISTING' ROOF LEVEL PLAN SHEET NO. A2.5 F� A� �D 1yz a 0 o - A 0— DD 0 0 TI Z N Q 4 � O porn i Z ul oM a ------—— ---o �y o N rm 0 610 EAST HYMAN BUILDING 610 EAST HYMAN AVENUE ASPEN,COLORADO 70 CHARLES CUNNIFFE ARCHITECTS 610 EAST HYMAN AVE. I ASPEN,CO 81611 1 TEL:970.926.5590 1 FAX:970.920.4557 n c m _ 3 4,E-1—TO PROPERTY MATCH STJC60 COLOR "ll'u-OpiRol-ol, TO. -—--—--—-- TO.PROPOSED 41` [ .. . . .. . . ... .. .. .. . . . .... . ... .. L TAIO NLe V MK OA F TF ADJACENT j A CL.O E NN T A%OO.ALUM.FASCIA OUTLINE 01 FHVO TO MATCH WINDOWS NO AlM FASCIA S�TO MATCH M ADJACENT BUILDING E ANOV STREET FACADE ALUM.WINDOWS TA.E%ISTIN6 G.M.U.-PAINT C MV PAINT OO VA E Osm EX&ROOF PROPOSED EX.&RED BRICK STJ6w w BRONZE ANOV. A— IKVOlE EANPS ATURE vfww.cunniffe.com CORNER MULLION 1 11 1 LINE OF ADJACENT BACK 4A-1 OF E.-.EVILIPINS EXIST�Nr BUILDING 50-H 6H PLANTER OUTLINE OF EX&ADJACENT BUILDING w STUCCO TO I I I I I I I I 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 MATCH EXISTINS r 5=ff rA=p U) SANDS EX-&TJ5F STEEL COLUMNS ui STUCCO-PAINT TO MATCH Exlsn;N;\ EXISTI&MAIN EXISTING MAIN T- LEVEL U EL 10 V, EX*C..V.-PAINT EXISTING ENTRY < uj -AR�&E E.I.TI 115TIN5 L011f D -Aill — — — — — — — — — — — I i I i @_V T ELEVATION _p�T�_(HYVAN AVE ELEVATI ON 0 O1_0 w T'ZL_oj'A'.5 T, T MELH.ENCLOSURE MATLH STUCCO COLOR OUTLINE or PROPOSED PROFERTY LINE T.O. PROPERTY LINE F TT --T-ILOINS FL.PROPOSED E FASCIA T.O.PROPOSED A A —--—-- PROPOSED AN V.ALVM.FASCIA"O - ------ TO MATCH HIMPOVe T.O.PROPOSED ' STUCCO TO MATCH LINE OF ADJACENT STREET FACADE PROPOSED BUILDING G.M.V.-PAINT ANOV.ALUM.FASCIA C.M.U. (3 TO MATCH IKOO.5 -PAINT T.O.EXIST INS HTIF T.O.EXISTIN& z PA -_====r-- - --1 -—__—-eC�- -J ILL! Z LILI Cl O PROPOSEOEX& L17L z 0 exla RED BRICK LINE I ADJACENT < E%ISTIN6 BUILDING EX-6 STUCCC, cG 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 11\ 'LASS&JAWRAIL I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I 5RONZF ANDO. I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I t ALM.AINpo"is CORNER MJLLIOI4 BALK MALL OP E.'5 WILDING STUCCO W ANOD. ALW.IF -EATURE CD OUTLINE OF EX'&ADJACENT BUILDING 13ANM OUTLINE OF PROPOSED ADJACENT BUILDING STUCCO TO MATCH EX-6 LOVER LEVEL EXISTING MAIN ------ ---------------- SL DRAWING: REPAIR EX STING INS ELEVATIONS 5 .0 REPAINT ---I'G TUBE STEEL COLS EXISTING ENTRY 11 1 INK] ISSUE: DATE TO MATCH EXISTIN&STAIN FINICHIPC 0422114 777! ------------ ------ Ax JOB NO. E EXISTING -1------ ------ SHEET NO, EAST L� _�J:R - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - ELEVATION NORTH ALL ELEVATION 1 1 4 6" - V-0" II II 3 6 T-o" 5.15TI A3.1 EXISTING —--—-- gA -—--—--—--—- — — — — — — T.O. PROPOSED ELEV. PENTHOU_5_ EL =138'-II" T.O. PROPOSED FASCIA . ELEVATOR PENTHOUSE TO MATCH STUCCO COLOR / \ ANOD. ALUM. FASCIA TO MATCH WINDOWS i co - BRONZE ANOD. � ' ALUM. WINDOWS U / STUCCO W/ ANOD. LLJ ALUM. FEATURE BANDS _ o T.O. EXISTING = PARAPET - - - - - - - EL = 12"V-4" .M.U. - PAINT w 0 30" ELEVATED ROOF LL � PLANTER STUCCO LL c TO MATCH EXISTING z 0 EX'G RED BRICK W a U w Cl) a VJ a Lli x J Q 2 U EXISTING UPPER -- - -- -- -- -- -- - LEVEL -- -- -- EL = 114'-8" EX'& STUCCO - z PAINT ORIGINAL 1c) WHITE J REPLACE EX'CG AWNINGS D Lu WINDOWS W/ ARCHED m Z0 WINDOWS TO REPLICATE z Q� ORIGINAL DESIGN CQ G 2E O =U w � wQ 0 EXISTING MAIN Q LEVEL LLJ - - -- - - EL = 104'-8" O DATE 4/22/14 EXISTING ENTRY LEVEL STREET ELEVATION - EL = 100' A3 .2 1/4.. V-011 73b 136—_- ]O'-G•Nb' ory rwar.Lirve T.O.PROPOSED • TOR PENTNF MEGNAN AL SLREEry PROPOSED NEW AU�___—__• _— _ EL.• 138'-II^ _ _.___ _ __—__—_____ __ __ __ __ __ -_ __—__ __—_ EL.• 13D'-O' PROPOSED NEW � I I i POWDER I NORTH DECK RESIDENTIAL KITCHEN ROOM STIBULE SOUTH DECK 1 1' I • __ ._—__ __—__ ____ -%In. PARR __ __ - Elm 17�'-$' PROPOSED EX6 ROOF • • EXISTING ROOF �L�vEL—Ap4UIQn___ __ _' _ __ __ _—_ __ • __ __� -' -- -� EL.. 134'-B' - -- www.cu nnfffe.com EXISTING OUTDOOR NEW OFFICE #1 VESTIBULE VESTIBULE BATH RESIDENTIAL BEDROOM ROOM EX15TINS LP ER PROPO -_—__ __—__—__—EL, 1�3' YEL.• 114'-B" //� INTERSTITIAL SPADE p `•) m ELEVATOR VESTIBULE EXISTING OFFICE EXISTING OFFICE NG OFFICE EXISTING OFFICE k U w EXITING MAIN _ , --— MPI EL.• 104'��� - I I U N EXISTING GARAGE i EXI5TING ENTRY y Q m _--_ SIDEWALK 5TREET �a� /- __ALLEY mil'/ KLSSARAGE - - ------ - ---- VESTIBULE EXISTING OFFICE EXISTING OFFICE EXISTING OFFICE U- ' I I EXISTING LOWER Z m i Z U I w EXISTING BASEMENT U BUILDING SECTION i U — I w J a PROPOSED NEW yyy -- -- -- EL.• 138'-O` • SKYLIGHT ' PROPOSED NEW R OF FASOIA __ __ _ EL• 135'4" ''nn v I NORTH DECK RESIDENTIAL KITCHEN PANTRY STAIR RESIDENTIAL SOUTH DECK Z 0_ W , / ' EXISTING ROOF PROPOSED EX6 ROOF / Z EL.• 134•_9•' �__ I \ I < QO NEW OFFICE #1 ADA TOILET SSTAIR�L DRESSING RESIDENTIAL BEDROOM EXISTING DECK =OU I \ \ I "'M U a • \y` EXISTING VPPER Q W PROPOSED VPPER • / �/� __ __ __ __— __ __ _�__ EL.e 114'-•__ y/ O l U7 ui INTER571TIAL 5PALE \ \ O RESIDENTIAL\ EXISTING OFFICE EXISTING OFFICE STING OFFICE u -1 S1_TAIR I I co \L i EXISTING MAIN ELF`.�04'-9' EXISTING R FOYER E INIAL DRAWING' BIALDIN6 SECTIONS G GARAGE cLD T ETRY ALLEY I _ EXISTING ENTRY ISSUE: DATE: SIDEWALK SKEET FINALHPC 04M" 3PSSE_ __—__ ________ ___ ; EL.• 99•-n" --- --- EAST STAIR EXISTING OFFICE EXISTING OFFICER. I O , E%15TING LOWER -- -- -' - -------- - EL�,�• � JOB NO. 0832 — ' SHEET NO. EXISTING BASEMENT I i BUILDING SECTION A4.1 I ®OGYGI6H1 MAPLES NN IFFE A91MiER5 II b.i 4 5 �M_L 1±s4 _ 3 r S='4 II e 'D 4�Y'wY.Y a .. r AA �. 'p�'.� her ; .r�''' • S u .B«, 'tl'.7a _ "4:" '��'1 �� �'U S, - -'�''•;. �al`, µ1.''-t-,�� 1,•'t _;. `.. t.1 f if. e i 6 4 5 �M_L 1±s4 _ 3 r S='4 II e 'D 4�Y'wY.Y a .. r AA �. 'p�'.� her ; .r�''' • S u .B«, 'tl'.7a _ "4:" '��'1 �� �'U S, - -'�''•;. �al`, µ1.''-t-,�� 1,•'t _;. `.. t.1 f if. e i •e `^>.�/.,,f � a �. ', , �� Y,, My41i,.e" �•p �i -y film �i i' x �t kA a z: a. n h. E � mry s`-irc 3� J n o n 5 � w .cunniffe.com �,F` eS. W cn 2 � Q W LL LL —_ Z g D z U � W J Q = 6 n � Z r 0 J w z O ■ m > Z a a cQ 2Eo W LLJ _ Q - _ �, • o lay- �AM1 �►,' DRAWING: :.J-k: ;,� EX15TING BUILDING yi! s:. A ISSUE DATE FlNAL HPC 0481114 JOB N0, 0832 SHEET NO. 610 EAST HYMAN - EXISTING PERSPECTIVE AT ALLEY A5.3 NO SCALE PM-MAALB LIAMFfE UMMS 1 k' 1 a .cunniffe.com 4 cf) 6 U W H _ Q W LL _ LL Z 0 Z - U � c� _ w w Q � U � 0 U Z_ J w LU if) � z p f m Q Q Qo }o z _ � a I— w U) o �. LLB e CD J�. DRAWING: ISSUEseo of DATE �P•,�. r t n, .; ,i. FlruLHac 84 f1P114 <iUIL '•"-� ,ctw�� s. , u a�� r- n+ rx' ,; a�w� - - " - - JOB NO. 0832 SHEET NO. 610 EAST HYMAN — PROPOSED PERSPECTIVE AT ALLEY A5.4 NO SCALE pYAI[M fNAAtES[ FFE AA[MTECiS ` EXHIBIT 15 1 all roof-top mechanical equipment located at middle rear of roof and surrounded with louvered metal fence - match stucco color MATERIAL SELECTIONS: MECHANICAL SCREEN 610 E. HYMAN AVE. D■ �Q ASPEN, COLORADO FINAL HPC CHARLES CUNNIFFE 22 APRIL 2014 ARCHITECTS r dark bronze metal fascia casement windows - clad exterior, wood interior sliding doors similar MATERIAL SELECTIONS: FASCIA/ WINDOWS + SLIDING DOORS IBM 610 E. HYMAN AVE. 191a ASPEN, COLORADO FINAL HPC CHARLES CUNNIFFE 22 APRIL 2014 ARCHITECTS R painted cmu painted C.M.U. to match color of existing stucco on alley MATERIAL SELECTIONS: PAINTED C.M.U. / EXISTING STUCCO ON ALLEY 610 E. HYMAN AVE. 0� ASPEN, COLORADO FINAL HPC CHARLES CUNNIFFE 22 APRIL 2014 ARCHITECTS EXHIBIT AFFIDAVIT OF PUBLIC NOTICE REQUIRED BY SECTION 26.304.060 (E),ASPEN LAND USE CODE ADDRESS OF PROPERTY: X21 E. �Vy�� Ary iA(4 C.+ , Aspen,CO SCHEDULED PUBLIC HEARING DATE: 4-!+%bear 2 - ,2a (•d- STATE OF COLORADO ) ss. County of Pitkin ) I, J nver U (name,please print) being or representing an Applicant to the City of Aspen, Colorado, hereby personally certify that I have complied with the public notice requirements of Section 26.304.060 (E)of the Aspen Land Use Code in the following manner: Publication of notice: By the publication in the legal notice section of an official paper or a paper of general circulation in the City of Aspen at least fifteen (15) days prior to the public hearing. A copy of the publication is attached hereto. Posting of notice: By posting of notice, which form was obtained from the Community Development Department, which was made of suitable, waterproof materials, which was not less than twenty-two (22) inches wide and twenty-six (26) inches high, and which was composed of letters not less than one inch in height. Said notice was posted at least fifteen(15)days prior to the public hearing on the4I4,in day ofSGf4_AnhW , 201-f, to and including the date and time.11 of the public hearing. A photograph of the posted notice (sign) is attached hereto. Mailing of notice. By the mailing of a notice obtained from the Community Development Department, which contains the information described in Section 26.304.060(E)(2) of the Aspen Land Use Code. At least fifteen(15) days prior to the public hearing, notice was hand delivered or mailed by first class postage prepaid U.S. mail to all owners of property within three hundred (300) feet of the property subject to the development application. The names and addresses of property owners shall be those on the current tax records of Pitkin County as they appeared no more than sixty (60) days prior to the date of the public hearing. A copy of the owners and governmental agencies so noticed is attached hereto. Neighborhood Outreach: ' Applicant attests that neighborhood outreach, summarized and attached, was conducted prior to the first public hearing as required in Section 26.304.035, Neighborhood Outreach. A copy of the neighborhood outreach summary, including the method of public notification and a copy of any documentation that was presented to the public is attached hereto. (continued on next page) Mineral Estate Owner Notice. By the certified mailing of notice, return receipt requested, to affected mineral estate owners by at least thirty(30) days prior to the date scheduled for the initial public hearing on the application of development. The names and addresses of mineral estate owners shall be those on the current tax records of Pitkin County. At a minimum, Subdivisions, PDs that create more than one lot, and new Planned Developments are subject to this notice requirement. Rezoning or text amendment. Whenever the official zoning district map is in any way to be changed or amended incidental to or as part of a general revision of this Title, or whenever the text of this Title is to be amended, whether such revision be made by repeal of this Title and enactment of a new land use regulation, or otherwise, the requirement of an accurate survey map or other sufficient legal description of, and the notice to and listing of names and addresses of owners of real property in the area of the proposed change shall be waived. However, the proposed zoning map shall be available for public inspection in the planning agency during all business hours for fifteen (15) days prior to the public hearing on such amendments. S* ature The foregoing"Affidavit of Notice"was a nowledged before e this aW day of S wr , 20. 0.i,by WITNESS MY HAND AND OFFICIAL SEAL My commission expires: 4� b ,2o►S' " Notary Public w 5 Ott; m TQNI ROSE SWERSKY n � s TTACHMENTS AS APPLICABLE: " ' m UBLICATION Cr OF THE POSTED NOTICE (SIGN) f�Etas OL26 015 WNERS AND GOVERNMENTAL AGENCIES NOTICED RTIFICATION OF MINERAL ESTAE OWNERS NOTICE Y C.R.S. §24-65.5-103.3 PUBLIC NOTICE RE: 610 E. HYMAN AVENUE- FINAL MAJOR DEVELOPMENT AND COMMERCIAL DESIGN REVIEW NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that a public hearing will be held on Wednesday, September 24, 2014 at a meeting to begin at 5:00 p.m. before the Aspen Historic Preservation Commission, City Council Chambers, City Hall, 130 S. Galena St., Aspen, to consider an application submitted by 610 E. Hyman, LLC, c/o Charles Cunniffe, 610 E. Hyman Avenue, Aspen, CO, 81611. The project affects the property located at 610 E. Hyman Avenue, Lot M, Block 99, City and Townsite of Aspen, Colorado, PID#2737-182-12-004. The applicant requests Final Major Development and Commercial Design review for an addition on top of an existing garage/carport, expansion of an existing residential unit, and alterations to the front fagade of the building. For further information, contact Amy Simon at the City of Aspen Community Development Department, 130 S. Galena St., Aspen, CO, (970) 429-2758, amy.simon@cityofaspen.com. s/Jay Maytin Chair,Aspen Historic Preservation Commission Published in the Aspen Times on September 4, 2014 City of Aspen Account PUBLIC NOTICE Date : Wed . , Sept. 24 , 2014 Time : 5:0o p. m . Place : Aspen City Hall , 130 S. Galena Street Purpose : HPC will review Final Major Development and Commercial Design . Applicant is 610 E . Hyman LLC,c/o Charles Cunniffe,610 E . Hyman, Aspen , CO, 8161 l .The project is an addition on top of an existing garage/carport, expansion of an existing residential unit & alterations to the front facade. For further information contact Aspen Planning Dept. at 970-429-2758. Use AveryO TEMPLATE 51600 1-800-GO-AVERY ov- 308 HUNTER LLC 4 SKIERS LP 514 AH LLC 490 WILLIAMS ST 1108 NORFLEET DR 514 E HYMAN AVE DENVER,CO 80218 NASHVILLE,TN 372201412 ASPEN,CO 81611 517 EAST HOPKINS ASPEN LLC 520 EAST COOPER PTNRS LLC 530 HOPKINS LLC 2001 N HALSTED#304 402 MIDLAND PARK 5301/2 E HOPKINS CHICAGO, IL 60614 ASPEN,CO 81611 ASPEN,CO 81611 630 EAST HYMAN LLC 633 SPRING II LLC 633 SPRING SECOND FLOOR LLC 532 E HOPKINS AVE 418 E COOPER AVE#207 601 E HYMAN AVE ASPEN,CO 81611 ASPEN, CO 81611 ASPEN, CO 81611 635 E HOPKINS LLC ALPINE BANK ASPEN ASPEN ART MUSEUM 532 E HOPKINS ATTN ERIN WIENCEK 590 N MILL ST ASPEN, CO 81611 PO BOX 10000 ASPEN,CO 81611 GLENWOOD SPRINGS,CO 81602 ASPEN BLOCK 99 LLC ASPEN CORE PENTHOUSE LLC ASPEN CORE VENTURES LLC 532 E HOPKINS AVE 0133 PROSPECTOR RD#4102B 418 E COOPER AVE#207 ASPEN, CO 81611 ASPEN,CO 81611 ASPEN,CO 81611 ASPEN PLAZA LLC ASPENHOF CONDO ASSOC ASPENHOF CONDO ASSOC PO BOX 1709 520 E COOPER AVE 600 E HOPKINS AVE#203 ASPEN, CO 81612 ASPEN,CO 81611 ASPEN,CO 81611 AUSTIN LAWRENCE CONNER LLC AVP PROPERTIES LLC BASS CAHN 601 LLC 532 E HOPKINS AVE 630 E HYMAN AVE#25 PO BOX 4060 ASPEN,CO 81611 ASPEN,CO 81611 ASPEN,CO 81612 BATTLE GERALD LIVING TRUST BAUM ROBERT E BERN FAMILY ASPEN PROPERTY LLC HIXON BURT LIVING TRUST PO BOX 1518 PO BOX 8020 PO BOX 2847 STOCKBRIDGE,MA 01262 GARDEN CITY,NY 11530 NEWPORT BEACH, CA 92659 BG SPRING LLC BIG HOPKINS LLC BISCHOFF JOHN C 300 S SPRING ST#202 421 N BEVERLY DR#300 565 CITRUS AVE ASPEN, CO 81611 BEVERLY HILLS,CA 90210 INPERIAL BEACH,CA 919321111 BOOGIES BUILDING OF ASPEN LLC BORGIOTTI CLAUDIO BOULANGEE ERICA C/O LEONARD WEINGLASS 10509 HUNTING CREST LN PO BOX 2596 534 E COOPER AVE VIENNA,VA 22192 ASPEN,CO 81612 ASPEN, CO 81611 A1113AV-09-008-1 .r...... (p09L5 31VIdW31®tiaAV asB ®09LS ®Atl wOriGaae-MMM ® 6u8uud aaa�wed Use Avery TEMPLATE 51600 ammmrsam 1-800-GO-AVERY • - ------ - -- CHATEAU ASPEN CONDO ASSOC -CHATE-AU ASPEN UNIT 21-A LLC CICUREL CARY 630 E COOPER AVE 600 E HOPKINS AVE#203 2615 N LAKEWOOD ASPEN,CO 81611 ASPEN,CO 81611 CHICAGO, IL 60614 CJAR LLC COOPER STREET COMPANY COOPER STREET DEVELOPMENT LLC 2514 LAKE MEAD DR 601 E HYMAN AVE C/O PYRAMID PROPERTY ADVISORS LAFAYETTE, CO 80026 ASPEN, CO 81611 418 E COOPER AVE#207 ASPEN, CO 81611 COX JAMES E LIVING TRUST DUNN JUDITH A REV LIV TRUST EB BUILDING ASPEN LLC 3284 SURMONT DR 8051 LOCKLIN LN 1601 ELM ST#4000 LAFAYETTE,CA 94549 COMMERCE TOWNSHIP, MI 48382 DALLAS,TX 75201 ERGAS VENESSA BLAIR&CLAUDE EXELCEDAR INC 20% FERRY JAMES H III PO BOX 4316 534 E HYMAN AVE BOX 166 ASPEN, CO 81612 ASPEN, CO 81611 GLENCOE, IL 600220166 FITZGERALD FAMILY PARTNERSHIP LTD FURNGULF LLP GELD LLC C/O PITKIN COUNTY DRY GOODS LLC 616 E HYMAN AVE PO BOX 1247 520 E COOPER ASPEN, CO 81611 ASPEN,CO 81612-1247 ASPEN, CO 81611 GOFEN ETHEL CARO TRUSTEE GONE WEST LLC GROSFELD ASPEN PROP PART LLC 455 CITY FRONT PLAZA 401 W CENTER 10880 WILSHIRE BLVD#2222 CHICAGO, IL 60611 SEARCY,AR 721451406 LOS ANGELES, CA 90024 HIMAN LLC HOPKINS DEV LLC HORSEFINS LLC PO BOX 6159 345 PARK AVE 33RD FLR 601 E HOPKINS AVE SWANBOURNE WA 6010 NEW YORK, NY 10154 ASPEN, CO 81611 AUSTRALIA, HUGHES GREGORY HUNTER PLAZA ASSOCIATES LLP JARDEN CORPORATION 208 S SPRING ST#1 602 E COOPER#202 2381 EXECUTIVE CENTER DR ASPEN,CO 81611 ASPEN,CO 81611 BOCA RATON,FL 33431 JENNE LLP JOSHUA&CO REAL ESTATE HOLDINGS JOYCE EDWARD 1510 WINDSOR RD LLC 1310 RITCHIE CT AUSTIN,TX 77402 300 S HUNTER ST CHICAGO, IL 60610 ASPEN, CO 81611 LCT LP LUCKYSTAR LLC M CUBED HOLDINGS LLC TENNESSEE LIMITED PARTNERSHIP PO BOX 7755 PO BOX 9667 PO BOX 101444 ASPEN,CO 81612 ASPEN,CO 81612 NASHVILLE,TN 37224-1444 AM3AV-09-008-L 009LS 31VidW31 SIUeAd esR 4D09L5 ®AIMAW ® wortieAe•A&MM 6ullulid eeJj wer Use Avery®TEMPLATE 51600 "' 1-800-GO-AVERY Vea —' -''" MALLARD ENTERPRISES LP MARTELL BARBARA MATTHEWS ZACHARY 317 SIDNEY BAKER S#400 702 E HYMAN AVE PO BOX 10582 KERRVILLE,TX 78028 ASPEN,CO 81611 ASPEN,CO 81612 MCMURRAY WILLIAM & HELEN MORRIS ROBERT P MYSKO ASPEN HOLDINGS 29 MIDDLE HEAD RD 600 E HOPKINS AVE STE 304 615 E HOPKINS AVE MOSMAN NSW 2088 ASPEN,CO 81611 ASPEN, CO 81611 AUSTRALIA, NIELSON COL STEVE&CAROL D NONNIE LLC OBERHOLTZER JORDAN 501 S FAIRFAX PO BOX 565 PO BOX 10582 ALEXANDRIA,VA 22314 ASPEN,CO 81612 ASPEN, CO 81612 OLITSKY TAMAR&STEPHEN P&L PROPERTIES LLC PITKIN CENTER CONDO OWNERS ASSOC PO BOX 514 101 S 3RD ST#360 517 W NORTH ST GWYNEDD VALLEY, PA 19437 GRAND JUNCTION, CO 81501 ASPEN,CO 81611 PITKIN COUNTY BANK 80% QTIP MARITAL TRUST 1/2 REUSS LIGHT LLC 534 E HYMAN AVE 40 E 80TH ST#PH 26A PO BOX 5000 ASPEN, CO 81611 NEW YORK,NY 10075 SNOWMASS VILLAGE,CO 81615 REVOLUTION PARTNERS LLC ROTHBLUM PHILIP 1/2 RUDIN MICHAEL&SABRINA PO BOX 1247 40 E 80TH ST#PH 26A 345 PARK AVE ASPEN,CO 81612 NEW YORK, NY 10075 NEW YORK, NY 10154 RUST TRUST RUTLEDGE REYNIE SCHNITZER KENNETH L&LISA L 233 S BEVERLY DR#B 51 COUNTRY CLUB CIR 2100 MCKINNEY AVE#1760 BEVERLY HILLS,CA 902123896 SEARCY,AR 72143 DALLAS,TX 75201 SEVEN CONTINENTS LLC SHUMATE ASPEN LLC SILVER DIP EQUITY VENTURE LLC 601 E HYMAN AVE 421 AABC#G 2100 MCKINNEY STE 1760 ASPEN, CO 81611 ASPEN,CO 81611 DALLAS,TX 75201 SJA ASSOCIATES LLC STERLING TRUST COMP STEWART TITLE CO 418 E COOPER AVE#207 2091 MANDEVILLE CYN RD PO BOX 669 ASPEN, CO 81611 LOS ANGELES, CA 90049 HOUSTON,TX 77001 SUITE 300 OFFICE LLC TENNESSEE THREE TENNESSEE THREE RENTALS 300 S SPRING ST#300 PO BOX 101444 C/O J H COBLE ASPEN, CO 81611 NASHVILLE,TN 37224-1444 5033 OLD HICKORY BLVD NASHVILLE,TN 37218-4020 AWAY-09-009-1 wog is 3wdw31&Gany asn o09tS(DAMAV ®� w0:)'rG8neM Mr► ® 6ur4wad aaaA wef �, "v Use Avery �TEMPLATE 5160® "`� 1-800-GO-AVERY �'N;_� jlou- THOMPSON ROSS& LYNETTE TOMKINS FAMILY TRUST TREUER CHRISTIN L PO BOX 367 520 E COOPER AVE#209 5455 LANDMARKL PL#814 CARBONDALE,CO 816230367 ASPEN,CO 81611 GREENWOOD VILLAGE,CO 801111955 VICTORIAN SQUARE LLC WAVO PROPERTIES LP WEIDEL LAWRENCE W 418 E COOPER AVE#207 512 1/2 E GRAND AVE#200 PO BOX 1007 ASPEN, CO 81611 DES MOINES, IA 50309-1942 MONROE,GA 30655 WF SWEARINGEN LLC WISE JOSEPH WM SNOWMASS LLC 450 CONWAY MANOR DR NW 1320 HODGES ST 500 FIFTH AVE#2440 ATLANTA, GA 30327 RALEIGH,NC 27604-1414 NEW YORK, NY 10110 WOLF LAWRENCE G TRUSTEE WOODS FRANK J III WRIGHT CHRISTOPHER N 22750 WOODWARD AVE#204 51027 HWY 6&24 STE 100 13 BRAMLEY RD FERNDALE,MI 48220 GLENWOOD SPRINGS, CO 81601 LONDON W10 6SP UK, YERAMIAN CHARLES REV TRUST PO BOX 12347 ASPEN, CO 81612 ®0965 ®A?1�Ab AV21AV-09-008-L ■®■ ®0915 3I ldW3i®tiaAV asB woa 1Gane•nnnnnn Bur ud 90JA wer AFFEDAN7IT OF PUBLIC NOTICE REQUIRED BY SECTION 26.304.060 (E),ASPEN LAND USE CODE ADDRESS OF PROPERTY: /O ✓Ytow� _, Aspen, CO SCHEDULED PUBLIC HEARING DATE: !pled �P_ 5: Dnorn , 2014- STATE OF COLORADO ) ss. County of Pitkin ) I Sc ---✓l (name, please print) being or representing an Applicant to the City of Aspen, Colorado, hereby personally certify that I have complied with the public notice requirements of Section 26.304.060 (E) of the Aspen Land Use Code in the following manner: I/ Pv_blication of notice: By the publication in the legal notice section of an official paper or a paper of general circulation in the City of Aspen at least fifteen (15) days prior to the public hearing. A copy of the publication is attached hereto. Posting of notice: By posting of notice, which form was obtained from the Community Development Department, which was made of suitable, waterproof materials, which was not less than twenty-two (22) inches 7 ide and twenty-six (26) inches high, and which was composed of letters not less than one inch in height. Said notice was posted at least fifteen (15) days prior to the public hearing on the day of , 20 , to and including the date and time of the public hearing. A photograph of the posted notice (sio z) is attached hereto. Mailing of notice. By the mailing of a notice obtained from the Community Development Department, which contains the information described in Section 26.304.060(E)(2) of the Aspen Land Use Code. At least fifteen (15) days prior to the public hearing, notice was hand delivered or inailed by first class postage prepaid U.S. mail to all owners of property within three hundred (300) feet of the property subject to the development application. The names and addresses of property owners shall be those on the current tax records of Pitkin County as they appeared no more than sixty (60) days prior to the date of the public hearing. A copy of the owners and goVer71771e77tal agencies so noticed is attached hereto. Neighborhood Outreach: Applicant attests that neighborhood outreach, suminarized and attached, was conducted prior to the first public hearing as required in Section 26.304.035, Neighborhood Outreach. A copy of the neighborhood outreach su77777za7y, including the method of public notification and a copy of any documentation that was presented to the public is attached hereto. (co77ti7lued 077 7aext page) i Mineral Estate Owner Notice. By the certified mailing of notice, return receipt requested, to affected mineral estate owners by at least thirty (30) days prior to the date scheduled for the initial public hearing on the application of development. The names and addresses of. incral estate owners shall be those on the current tax records of Pitkin County. At a minimum, Subdivisions, SPAS or PUDs that create more than one lot, new Planned Unit Developments, and. new Specially Planned Areas, are subject to this notice requirement. Rezoning or text amendment. Whenever the official zoning district map is in any way to be changed or amended incidental to or as part of a general revision of this Title, or whenever the text of this Title is to be amended, whether such revision be made by repeal of this Title and enactment of a new land use regulation, or otherwise, the requirement of an accurate survey map or other sufficient legal description of, and the notice to and listing of names and addresses of owners of real property in the area of the proposed change shall be waived. However, the proposed zoning map shall be available for public inspection in the planning agency during all business hours for fifteen (15) days prior to the public hearing on such amendments. Signature The foregoing"Affidavit of Notice" was acknowled ed before me this 14 day ofd-elk- , 20 J*�>by WITNESS MY HAND AND OFFICIAL SEAL PUBLIC NOTICE RE:610 E.HYMAN AVENUE- FINAL MAJOR DEVELOPMENT AND COMMERCIAL DESIGN REVIEW My COiTLIT11SS1On expires: - NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that a public hearing t' will be held on Wednesday,September 24,2014 at a meetinbegin at o p.m.before the Aspen -/—� Historic Preservation C a Commission,City Council Chambers,City Hall,130 S.Galena St.,Aspen,to �,7 consider an application submitted by 610 E.Hy- man,LLC,c/o Charles Cunniffe,610 E.Hyman ary Avenue,Aspen,CO,81611. The project affects �+ the property boated at 610 E.Hyman Averse,Lot KAREN REED PA�FTERSON M.Block 99,City and Townsite of Aspen,Colo- rado,PID#2737-182-12.004. The applicant re- - NOTARY PUBLIC quests Final Major Development and Commercial Design review for an addition on top of an existing STATE O COLC:jW,AIJ0 garage/carport,expansion of an existing residen- - 11yy t� tial unit,and alterations to the front fayade of the NO'T'ARY 10#199640027137 building. For further information,contact Amy Si- ���+ n mon at the City of Aspen Community Development ATTACHMENTS AS to PLICABLE: My Commission Explree N� tUxry 18,2016 Department,130 S.Galena St.,Aspen,CO,(970) �7 7� 429-2758,amy.simon@cityofaspen.com. I UBLICATION slisy Historic Preservation Commission -OF THE POSTED NOTICE (SIGN) 2201b41i('5151102hj gapers Times on September 4, ,HERS AND GOVERNMENTAL AGENCIES NOTICED -�Y MAIL • APPLICANT CERTIFICATION OF MINERAL ESTAE OWNERS NOTICE AS REQUIRED BY C.R.S. §24-65.5-103.3 lll �i1�i�J11J11 �, 1111 1111111�111111�_ 1 f ' � r k «p � �• Ll L • 1 p _ r � 1.� • yY4 - \. �. f y � 7