Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutagenda.hpc.20230412AGENDA ASPEN HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION April 12, 2023 4:30 PM, City Council Chambers - 3rd Floor 427 Rio Grande Place Aspen, CO 81611 I.ROLL CALL II.MINUTES II.A Draft Minutes - 1/25/23, 2/1/2023, 2/22/23 III.PUBLIC COMMENTS IV.COMMISSIONER MEMBER COMMENTS V.DISCLOSURE OF CONFLICT OF INTEREST VI.PROJECT MONITORING VI.A 414-420 E. Cooper Avenue, JAS renovation- Project Monitoring VI.B Project Monitor List VII.STAFF COMMENTS VIII.CERTIFICATE OF NO NEGATIVE EFFECT ISSUED IX.CALL UP REPORTS X.SUBMIT PUBLIC NOTICE FOR AGENDA ITEMS XI.OLD BUSINESS minutes.hpc.20230125_DRAFT.docx minutes.hpc.20230201_DRAFT.docx minutes.hpc.20230222_DRAFT.docx JAS Project Monitoring Memo April 2023.pdf JAS Narrative and Drawings.pdf PROJECT MONITORING.doc 1 1 XII.NEW BUSINESS XII.A 214 W. Bleeker Street – Minor Development, Relocation and Variation Review, PUBLIC HEARING XII.B 312 W. Hyman Avenue –Substantial Amendment to Major Development, PUBLIC HEARING XIII.ADJOURN XIV.NEXT RESOLUTION NUMBER 214 W Bleeker_Memo_April 12 2023.pdf 214 W Bleeker_Resolution_X_Series of 2023.pdf Exhibit A_HP Guidelines Criteria_Staff Findings.pdf Exhibit B_Relocation Criteria_Staff Findings.pdf Exhibit C_Setback Variations.pdf Exhibit D_214 W. Bleeker Application.pdf 312 W Hyman HPC Substantial Amendment Memo April 12.pdf 312 W Hyman HPC Substantial Amendment Resolution.pdf Exhibit A_HP Guidelines Staff Findings.pdf Exhibit B_Setback Variations.pdf TYPICAL PROCEEDING FORMAT FOR ALL PUBLIC HEARINGS (1 Hour, 10 Minutes for each Major Agenda Item) 1. Declaration of Conflicts of Interest (at beginning of agenda) 2. Presentation of proof of legal notice (at beginning of agenda) 3. Applicant presentation (20 minutes) 4. Board questions and clarifications of applicant (5 minutes) 5. Staff presentation (5 minutes) 6. Board questions and clarifications of staff (5 minutes) 7. Public comments (5 minutes total, or 3 minutes/ person or as determined by the Chair) 8. Close public comment portion of hearing 9. Applicant rebuttal/clarification (5 minutes) 10. Staff rebuttal/clarification (5 minutes) End of fact finding. Chairperson identifies the issues to be discussed. 11. Deliberation by the commission and findings based on criteria commences. No further input from applicant or staff unless invited by the Chair. Staff may ask to be recognized if there is a factual error to be corrected. If the item is to be continued, the Chair may provide a summary of areas to be restudied at their discretion, but the applicant is not to re-start discussion of the case or the board’s direction. (20 minutes) 12. Motion 2 2 Updated: November 15, 2021 3 3 REGULAR MEETING HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION JANUARY 25TH, 2023 Chairperson Thompson opened the regular meeting of the Aspen Historic Preservation Commission at 4:30pm. Commissioners in attendance: Jeffrey Halferty, Roger Moyer, Jodi Surfas, Barb Pitchford and Kara Thompson. Staff present: Amy Simon, Planning Director Kate Johnson, Assistant City Attorney Mike Sear, Deputy City Clerk MINUTES: Mr. Moyer motioned to approve the minutes from 12/14/22. Ms. Pitchford seconded. Roll call vote: Mr. Moyer, yes; Ms. Surfas, yes; Ms. Pitchford, yes; Mr. Halferty, yes; Ms. Thompson, yes. 5-0 vote, motion passes. PUBLIC COMMENTS: None. COMMISSION MEMBER COMMENTS: None. DISCLOSURE OF CONFLICTS OF INTEREST: None. PROJECT MONITORING: None. STAFF COMMENTS: None. CERTIFICATE OF NO NEGATIVE EFFECT: None. CALL UP REPORTS: None. SUBMIT PUBLIC NOTICE FOR AGENDA ITEMS: Ms. Johnson said that she reviewed public notice, and that notice was provided per the code for both agenda items. OLD BUSINESS: 205 W. Main Street - Historic Preservation Conceptual Major Development, Relocation, Certificates of Affordable Housing Credits, Growth Management Quota System, Special Review, Transportation and Parking Management - CONTINUE PUBLIC HEARING TO FEBRUARY 22 nd Ms. Thompson moved to continue the item to February 22nd, 2023. Mr. Halferty seconded. Roll call vote:Mr. Moyer, yes; Ms. Surfas, yes; Ms. Pitchford, yes; Mr. Halferty, yes; Ms. Thompson, yes. 5-0 vote,motion passes. NEW BUSINESS: 602 E. Hyman Avenue– Minor Development Review, Commercial Design Review, PUBLIC HEARING Applicant Presentation:Mr. Dave Rybak – Rybak Architecture & Development Mr. Rybak began by describing the property and reviewing a bit of its history. He then showed a site plan that highlighted the three requests of the applicant. These included enlarging the existing door 4 REGULAR MEETING HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION JANUARY 25TH, 2023 opening on the second-floor deck, installing sand set stone pavers below the existing deck, and adding a new wood screen to cover the utility meters. He then went on to describe each request in more detail and included pictures of existing conditions and renderings of the proposed changes. Regarding the request to enlarge the existing door opening on the second floor, he described a 2017 renovation to the building and showed pictures from before the renovation and the current condition highlighting the existing door. He also showed a rendering of the proposed west elevation that highlighted again all three requests. Staff Presentation:Amy Simon - Planning Director Ms. Simon began by stating that this property was designated an AspenModern Historic Landmark in 2013. She went over some of the building’s history. Next, she went over the three requests of the applicant and the review criteria for HPC. Regarding the request to install pavers she mentioned that there is a large tree in this area and that mulch was required in the past, but the City Forester has authorized the installation of the pavers now. Staff supports this request. Moving on to the proposed fence to screen the utility meters, she said that staff supports the concept but suggests a more minimal design that would be closer to the meters, potentially painted white to match the building and removeable when needed. She noted that this wall was identified as the only reasonable place to locate the meters due to code restrictions, but the guidelines do encourage the screening of these elements. Moving onto the request to enlarge the door and window grouping on the second floor, she mentioned that this door serves as the entry to the upper floor residential unit. The original door from the 1970s was 6’ wide and the entry deck was smaller. In the renovation the deck was enlarged, and the doors were increased to 10’ 4”. The current request is to further increase the opening to 14’ 3”. She said that staff does not support this request as they believe the guidelines are not met. She mentioned that the HPC denied the addition of a separate window next to the door at the previous land use review, finding that it departed from the original design. She said that clear images from the original construction are not available but generally there were larger openings on the south façade and limited openings on the east and west. She closed by stating that staff recommends HPC approve the pavers, allow for the utilities screening to be further refined with staff and monitor and to deny the enlargement of the door. Barb Pitchford left the meeting at 5:00pm. PUBLIC COMMENT: None. BOARD DISCUSSION: Ms. Thompson agreed with staff about the material and color of the screening. She then went over the requests and asked if there was support for each. There was overall support for the pavers. The Board then discussed the proposed screening for the utilities and made suggestions for different designs, materials, and installations. As for the window enlargement the members were generally not supportive of the request, yet there were some thoughts raised that if it was already enlarged once why not allow a further enlargement. MOTION: Ms. Thompson motioned to approve the next resolution in the series with the changes to Section #1. These included that enlarging the door on the second story is not approved, but a new pocketed door system or a different number of panels within the existing opening is approved. 5 REGULAR MEETING HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION JANUARY 25TH, 2023 Regarding the proposed screen wall for the utility meters, the meters are approved to be painted to match the white CMU wall as a first step. If further improvement is desired, the architect may propose an additional screening solution which is less impactful than the original concept, for review and approval by staff and monitor. This may include vegetation or a screen that is painted to match the white CMU. Mr. Moyer seconded. Roll call vote:Mr. Moyer, yes; Ms. Surfas, yes; Mr. Halferty, yes; Ms. Thompson, yes. 4-0 vote, motion passes. Ms. Surfas was assigned as project monitor for this item. Mr. Halferty was assigned to the 413 E. Main as project manager. ADJOURN: Ms. Thompson motioned to adjourn the regular meeting. Mr. Moyer seconded. All in favor; motion passes. ____________________ Mike Sear, Deputy City Clerk 6 REGULAR MEETING HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION FEBRUARY 1ST, 2023 Chairperson Thompson opened the regular meeting of the Aspen Historic Preservation Commission at 4:40pm. Commissioners in attendance: Peter Fornell, Roger Moyer, Jodi Surfas, and Kara Thompson. Commissioners not in attendance: Barb Pitchford, Jeffrey Halferty and Sheri Sanzone Staff present: Amy Simon, Planning Director Kate Johnson, Assistant City Attorney Mike Sear, Deputy City Clerk MINUTES: Mr. Moyer motioned to approve the minutes from 1/11/23. Ms. Surfas seconded. Roll call vote: Mr. Fornell, yes; Mr. Moyer, yes; Ms. Surfas, yes; Ms. Thompson, yes. 4-0 vote, motion passes. PUBLIC COMMENTS: None. COMMISSION MEMBER COMMENTS: None. DISCLOSURE OF CONFLICTS OF INTEREST: Mr. Fornell stated that he had introduced the buyer and seller on this property and like at the conceptual review, he would be recusing himself. PROJECT MONITORING: None. STAFF COMMENTS: Ms. Simon commented that the new hire for the Historic Preservation Principal Planner position has backed out. She was disappointed but the position will continue to be posted. CERTIFICATE OF NO NEGATIVE EFFECT: None. CALL UP REPORTS: None. SUBMIT PUBLIC NOTICE FOR AGENDA ITEMS: NEW BUSINESS: 315 E. Hyman Ave. Minor, Commercial Design and View Plane Review - CONTINUE PUBLIC HEARING TO MARCH 8th. Ms. Simon stated that this item does not actually need to be continued as the applicant has scaled back their proposed exterior changes to such a minimal scope that it is being assigned to staff. Ms. Johnson commented that this item will be withdrawn from the HPC agendas. Peter Fornell left the meeting at 4:47pm. NEW BUSINESS: 1020 E Cooper Ave. - Final Major Development, PUBLIC HEARING Ms. Simon introduced the item and remined the Commission that it had been a while since they approved the conceptual review and design for this property. She noted that final review includes 7 REGULAR MEETING HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION FEBRUARY 1ST, 2023 landscaping, lighting, materials, and details of historic preservation. She then turned it over to Sarah Adams for her presentation. Applicant Presentation:Sarah Adams – Bendon Adams Ms. Adams started by introducing herself, Mr. Brian Beazley from DJ Architects, and Ken Miller who will be the project manager on this project. She then described the timeline for the Conceptual Design review in 2021 and recapped the project. She went on to describe the elements that were in front of HPC for Final Review. The landscape plan is exactly the same as what was presented at the Conceptual Review and included a simple planting plan around the landmark property. She then showed a view of the proposed rear of the property including the trash and recycling area, two parking spaces and other details. Next, she went over the preservation plan and commented that the historic building is a mystery. She had searched all over to try to figure out what it looked like and even the interior framing doesn’t tell them what it originally looked like. They are basing their preservation plan on the existing footprint. She mentioned that Mr. Beazley and his team had put together some architectural details for the commission’s consideration and that they were a starting point for the building permit and working with staff and monitor. She then went over a few conditions in the resolution that they would be amenable to continue to work on. She described a small porch on a non-historic section of the landmark that they would be adding as an entry to the rear unit in that building. This would include simple porch columns to differentiate it as not being historic. She moved on to describe the proposed materials for both the landmark building and new building and Mr. Beazley passed around several samples to the commissioners. These materials are consistent with what was presented at the Conceptual Review. She showed multiple views of the project and went over how the proposed materials and fenestration related to form in relation to the guidelines. She also showed a few renderings of the project and highlighted the materials. Next, she highlighted conditions 4-7 in the resolution which are different than what is typically seen and noted that they are amenable to all of them and happy to work with staff and monitor on them as well. Ms. Thompson asked if the proposed roofing material for the front porch on the historic resource was to be standing seem metal. Mr. Beazley said it was originally proposed as such but is now proposed to be cedar. Ms. Thompson then asked what the roof slope was on that porch, to which Mr. Beazley said 3. Ms. Thompson then asked if that was something HPC or staff asked for, to which Ms. Simon said she always asks for that and that her understanding is that if you have at least a 3:12 slope you are ok. Ms. Thompson then asked if the proposed windows for the addition and non-historic portion of the landmark building were aluminum clad wood. Mr. Beazley said yes, but that they could do fully wood interior and exterior windows on the historic. Ms. Thompson then asked if they had spoken with the City on the electrical service for the project, to which Ms. Adams said yes. She said there was ample service, especially since they had reduced the number of units. Mr. Moyer asked if it was a metal skirting at the bottom of the siding on the historic resource to which Mr. Beazley said yes and pointed it out on the drawing and referred to a sample that was provided. Mr. Moyer then gave some advice for the installationof the siding and skirting. There was then some more discussion about the siding and skirting. Mr. Moyer then gave some advice on the metal railings and suggested that they be powder coated. Mr. Beazley confirmed that they are planning on a powder coating for them. 8 REGULAR MEETING HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION FEBRUARY 1ST, 2023 Staff Presentation:Amy Simon - Planning Director Ms. Simon started by reviewing the conditions of approval included in the resolution. First, she went over the first three conditions and stated that they are just a repeat of what was in the Conceptual approval. She then went over the next four conditions. These included the accuracy of the fenestration plan; the applicant providing cut sheets for the proposed doors and windows on the historic resource; that the posts on the front porch of the historic resource would be modeled after other Aspen Victorian structures and were to be reviewed and approved by staff and monitor; and that the roof of the historic resource be fire rated cut wood cedar shingles of uniform length and coursing. She then finished by noting that staff is recommending approval. Ms. Thompson asked if there was any way that the original porch posts could have been a simple square post. Ms. Simon said it was possible. PUBLIC COMMENT: None. BOARD DISCUSSION: Ms. Johnson wanted to state for the record before Board discussion, that the public noticing for this project was provided in accordance with the code as it wasn’t stated earlier in the meeting. Ms. Thompson asked if there were any comments from board members before discussion. Mr. Moyer said he concurred with staff and the conditions. Ms. Thompson commented that she normally didn’t like to approve wood shingles on a 3/12 roof pitch. She asked if the other commissioners would mind if that was left up to staff and monitor. Mr. Moyer said he was fine with it being reviewed by staff and monitor and that they needed to have a discussion with regards to wood shingles, knowing the environment we live in with respect to wildfires. MOTION: Ms. Thompson motioned to approve the next resolution in the series with a revision to condition #6 to note approval by staff and monitor of the porch posts prior to building permit submittal and well as a revision to condition #7 to note the front porch roof material to be a fire-rated cut wood cedar shingle of a uniform length and coursing, or an alternative to be approved by staff and monitor. Mr. Moyer seconded. Roll call vote:Mr. Moyer, yes; Ms. Surfas, yes; Ms. Thompson, yes. 3-0 vote, motion passes. Ms. Thompson volunteered to be the project monitor for this item. ADJOURN: Ms. Thompson motioned to adjourn the regular meeting. Mr. Moyer seconded. All in favor; motion passes. ____________________ Mike Sear, Deputy City Clerk 9 REGULAR MEETING HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION FEBRUARY 22ND, 2023 Chairperson Thompson opened the regular meeting of the Aspen Historic Preservation Commission at 4:30pm. Commissioners in attendance: Peter Fornell, Roger Moyer, Jodi Surfas, Jeffery Halferty and Kara Thompson. Commissioners not in attendance: Ms. Pitchford and Ms. Sanzone Staff present: Amy Simon, Planning Director Kate Johnson, Assistant City Attorney Mike Sear, Deputy City Clerk MINUTES: None PUBLIC COMMENTS: None. COMMISSION MEMBER COMMENTS: None. DISCLOSURE OF CONFLICTS OF INTEREST: None. PROJECT MONITORING: Ms. Simon mentioned that she had some additional things to discuss with Mr. Halferty about 227 East Bleeker that is under construction. STAFF COMMENTS: Ms. Simon responded to a question from Mr. Moyer about the status of 205 W. Main St. She said that the applicant had requested the item be continued and that they are rethinking their design and may be withdrawing the current application and submitting a new one. The continuance is on this agenda. Mr. Moyer then asked about the status of the Main St. Bakery project, to which Ms. Simon said it was under construction. There was some discussion about the current status of the construction and work on the historic resource. CERTIFICATE OF NO NEGATIVE EFFECT: None. CALL UP REPORTS: None. SUBMIT PUBLIC NOTICE FOR AGENDA ITEMS: Ms. Johnson said that she reviewed public notice, and that notice was provided per the code for both agenda items. OLD BUSINESS: 205 W. Main Street | Historic Preservation Conceptual Major Development | Relocation | Certificates of Affordable Housing Credits | Growth Management Quota System | Special Review | Transportation and Parking Management, PUBLIC HEARING CONTINUED TO MARCH 22, 2023 Ms. Thompson moved to continue the agenda item to March 22, 2023. Mr. Halferty seconded. Roll call vote:Mr. Fornell, yes; Mr. Moyer, yes; Ms. Surfas, yes; Mr. Halferty, yes; Ms. Thompson, yes. 5-0 vote, motion passes. 10 REGULAR MEETING HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION FEBRUARY 22ND, 2023 NEW BUSINESS: 333 W. Main Street- Minor Development, PUBLIC HEARING Ms. Simon introduced Ms. Reid and commented on the history of this property and a previous application to put in a temporary handrail. Applicant Presentation:Suzannah Reid, Reid Architects Ms. Reid displayed the site plan and highlighted the front stairs. She also showed a historic picture of the property and one of the current conditions. She described the current condition of the front stairs and noted that they are quite wide and the two existing handrails on each side are pretty low and so don’t really function as intended. The proposed new handrail would only touch the historic parts of the building where the existing temporary railing is located. She noted the stairs are not historic and are starting to deteriorate in places. Replacement of these materials would be part of the project. She went over the simple design of the railings. Staff Presentation:Amy Simon - Planning Director Ms. Simon reiterated Ms. Reid’s comments that the stairs were not historic and appear to be reconstructed at some point. She mentioned that there are very few applicable guidelines here. The guidelines do discourage against making changes to character defining features, but this project is leaving the existing historic materials intact and adding something that is clearly new but elegantly designed. Their recommendation is that the guidelines are met and noted that the language in the resolution also proposed in kind repair of the existing stairs materials and the enclosure of the underside of the stairs. Mr. Halferty asked if the existing center railing was historic and if it was being removed. Ms. Simon said it was not historic and would be removed. Mr. Fornell asked if the new center railing was being proposed in order to meet ADA requirements, to which Ms. Reid said not ADA but standard handrail code requirements for height, etc. Mr. Fornell asked about the existing side handrails code compliance, to which Ms. Reid said they are very low and do not meet standards. PUBLIC COMMENT: None. BOARD DISCUSSION: Ms. Thompson said she had no issues with the design as proposed and that it will be helpful to have the new handrail. Mr. Fornell asked if there was a threshold where a minor amendment comes to HPC versus being handled by staff. Ms. Simon said there are Certificates of No Negative Effect that are usually brought to HPC at the beginning of meetings, but since this was so front and center on the building, she felt it needed HPC’s input. Mr. Moyer asked about the need that prompted the addition of this new center handrail. Ms. Simon said an owner had recently broken his leg so there was a sudden need. The temporary handrail from 2019 was supposed to go away, which prompted the applicant to come in and ask for a permanent solution. She noted that this is not required by code but driven by the HOA who would like to have this. 11 REGULAR MEETING HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION FEBRUARY 22ND, 2023 MOTION: Ms. Thompson moved to approve the next resolution in the series as written. Mr. Fornell seconded. Roll call vote:Mr. Fornell, yes; Mr. Moyer, yes; Ms. Surfas, yes; Mr. Halferty, yes; Ms. Thompson, yes. 5-0 vote, motion passes. NEW BUSINESS: Summary of Colorado Preservation Inc. - 2023 Conference Sessions - Jeff Halferty and Roger Moyer. Mr. Halferty went over his presentation summing up their experience at the conference. Mr. Moyer added his comments and thoughts on the conference. ADJOURN: Ms. Thompson motioned to adjourn the regular meeting. Mr. Fornell seconded. All in favor; motion passes. ____________________ Mike Sear, Deputy City Clerk 12 Page 1 of 2 130 South Galena Street Aspen, CO 81611-1975 | P: 970.920.5197 | cityofaspen.com MEMORANDUM TO: Aspen Historic Preservation Commission FROM: Amy Simon, Planning Director MEETING DATE: April 12, 2023 RE: 414-420 E. Cooper Avenue, JAS renovation- Project Monitoring BACKGROUND: In 2019, HPC approved a minor development application for the renovation of the upper floor of the historic Red Onion (420 E. Cooper Avenue) and non-historic Red Onion Office building to the west (414-416 E. Cooper Avenue) to accommodate a venue space for Jazz Aspen Snowmass. The project was primarily an interior remodel, with some modifications to the exterior of the Red Onion Office building, including an expansion towards the alley and installation of skylights. The historic Red Onion building is a mid-block building that has been abutted on the west by the two story Red Onion Offices building for many years, and on the east by a one story building. On the ground floor, all three structures were internally linked in the past when the Red Onion restaurant and bar operation was much larger. Historic photos indicate that there were some original upper floor window openings on each side of the Red Onion; see c. 1950s photos from the Aspen Historical Society below. The upper west windows remained in place until they were covered over in the 70s/80s. The east wall appears to have some original windows that were filled in by the time this photo was taken. The row of east upper windows in place now are not original and appear to have been added in the 1980s, likely when the space was remodeled for office use. 13 Page 2 of 2 130 South Galena Street Aspen, CO 81611-1975 | P: 970.920.5197 | cityofaspen.com The JAS project has approval to add/alter penetrations through the east and west side walls of the historic Red Onion to create a better flow through the venue space and to access a new elevator/stair column that will be on the east side of the building in the Restoration Hardware project at 434 E. Cooper. During the 2019 review, staff and HPC did not discuss or object to these wall penetrations, presumably viewing them as minimal in scope and necessary. When the project was submitted for building permit, staff flagged a concern that the permit set showed a significant opening in the west wall of the historic Red Onion, nearly front to back, leading into the main performance area for the venue, supported by a new interior structure. Staff and Project Monitor Jeff Halferty discussed the extent of demolition and ultimately determined that HPC input is necessary for work beyond what was represented in the approval process. The project architects, Charles Cunniffe Architects, have studied their design and have reduced the amount of new brick removal from what was shown in the building permit to 550 square feet on the east and west combined; 22 square feet more than the board reviewed. The discussion is somewhat complicated by the fact that on both the east and west walls, windows have been added or filled in the past, so that arguably the new changes, on top of the old changes, are adding up to significant loss of integrity. That said, the existing approval stands and staff does not encourage HPC to overcomplicate the execution of this project. The architects have indicated that the character of the brick is valued and that it will remain exposed on the interior. Demolition affecting sidewalls of historic structures in the downtown area is a topic that has not been common in past reviews of commercial development, in staff’s recollection. Many historic structures in the downtown are sandwiched between other buildings and their side walls may or may not be exposed to view at all. There have not been many examples of connecting adjacent buildings across property lines, and few or none that have generated such extensive openings as proposed in the subject project. Staff feels that this is an important discussion for HPC to have and that the JAS project should not meaningfully exceed the extent of demolition that was previously understood. Staff asks that HPC provide direction to staff and monitor to either: • Accept the attached revised proposal without further evaluation; or • Work with the architect to align new openings, to the extent possible, with areas of brick that are already disturbed in order to limit demolition of in-situ historic masonry to the extent possible, while accommodating the functional needs of JAS. ATTACHMENTS: Applicant proposal 14 April 5, 2023 Amy Simon Planning Director 427 Rio Grande Place Aspen, CO 81611 Re: Narrative - JAS Center Historic Brick Wall Dear Amy Simon, The below narrative explains our request for an administrative approval to modify the original HPC submittal regarding interior brick walls at the upper level of the JAS Center. The original HPC review approved a total of 528 SF of brick to be removed (315 SF from the west wall and 213 SF from the east wall). The HPC approved plans had one of the JAS Center restrooms located east of the main property line between JAS and Restoration Hardware (RH). After the HPC approval, changes were made by RH to their core and shell, stair location, and overall egress path. These RH changes eliminated one of the JAS restrooms and required the reduced JAS venue space to accommodate the new restroom. These plan changes resulted in our proposal to remove additional brick on the west wall and remove less brick on the east wall. The attached proposed plans and sections show the areas of interior brick we are requesting to be removed, as well as the brick we would be preserving. Our goal is to express and celebrate the historic brick wall throughout the JAS Center as much as possible and not to alter any portion of the exterior brick. We have also included plans and sections showing brick openings from the original HPC approval. This modification should still support HPC’s aesthetic by expressing the brick wall through the entire venue, while also supporting the functional aspect of adequate circulation and useable spaces in the JAS Center. HPC approved the removal of 528 SF of brick (315 SF west wall + 213 SF east wall). We are requesting to remove 550 SF of brick (411 SF west wall + 139 SF east wall). The additional 22 SF of brick we are requesting is less than 1 % of the existing walls. Best regards, Charles L. Cunniffe Charles L. Cunniffe, FAIA Principal 15 UP A6.2 1 A6.1 1 54"39"5-J 5-J 4.3-J 4.3-J 4-J 4-J 3-J 3-J 2-J 2-J 1-J 1-J PL 2 PL 2 PL 1 PL 1 PL 4 PL 4 PL 3 PL 3 A-J A-J B-J B-J B.3-J B.3-J B.7-J B.7-J B.9-J B.9-J C-J C-J A6.3 1 A6.5 1 A7.1 A6.6 1 30"48"36" 60"42"78"54"48"36"60"54" A6.4 14'-8 7/8"can we try to push this window back for a deeper sill? 1 INCLINED PLATFORM LIFT A7.2 3 A7.12 A7.1 3 VIP LOUNGE 204 GREEN ROOM 206 RECORDING STUDIO 207 ISO ROOM 207B SOUND LOCK 207A WOMEN'S RR 210 KITCHEN 212 WALK-IN COOLER 212A MEN'S RR 213 JAN. CLO. 213A STORAGE205BSTORAGE205CSTAGE 205A OUTDOOR TERRACE 214 BAR 203 A/V 205D VENUE 205 STORAGE 211A GALLERY CORRIDOR 211 UPPER LEVEL GALLERY 201 WAIT STATION 205E 2 A6.8 1 1 DRY STORAGE209PRIVATE COMMODE 206A FURNITURE STORAGE 208 STORAGE 202 6 CHARLES CUNNIFFE ARCHITECTS COPYRIGHT CHARLES CUNNIFFE ARCHITECTSC 610 EAST HYMAN AVE. ASPEN, CO 81611 TEL: 970.925.5590 FAX: 970.920.4557 cunniffe.com SHEET NO. JOB NO.3/13/2023 1:38:52 PMA2.2 1825 MAIN LEVEL FLOOR PLANJAS CENTER422 E COOPER AVEASPEN, CO 81611NORTH 3/16" = 1'-0" 1 MAIN LEVEL FLOOR PLAN ISSUE: DATE: HVAC & PLUMBING 01/16/23100'-5 1/4"21'-7 1/2"4'-4"3'-0"8'-6"EAST WALL (PROPOSED) 100' - 5" = WALL LENGTH 15' - 10" = WALL OPENING (16 %) ------------------------------------------------ 4' - 4" = OPENING 01 3' - 0" = OPENING 02 8' - 6" = OPENING 03 16'-6"22'-0"4'-4"WEST WALL (PROPOSED) 100' - 5" = WALL LENGTH 45' - 10" = WALL OPENING (45 %) ------------------------------------------------ 3' - 0" = OPENING 01 4' - 4" = OPENING 02 0' - 0" = OPENING 03 22' - 0" = OPENING 04 16' - 6" = OPENING 05 PL ALK-IN COOLE 212A 3'-0"DRY STORAGECHASE CHASEFURNITURE STORAGE GALLERYNGTHGHTENING (16.7%)----------------STORAGE (KITCHEN OR CHAIRS)WOM GALLERY RRUPPER LEVEL PLAN (PROPOSED)8'-0"16 ENTRY LEVEL 0" MAIN LEVEL 14'-3 1/2" 5-J4.3-J4-J3-J2-J1-JPL 2 PL 1 9' - 6 1/8"CHARLES CUNNIFFE ARCHITECTS COPYRIGHT CHARLES CUNNIFFE ARCHITECTSC 610 EAST HYMAN AVE. ASPEN, CO 81611 TEL: 970.925.5590 FAX: 970.920.4557 cunniffe.com SHEET NO. JOB NO.3/16/2023 12:08:17 PMA4.1 1825 BUILDING SECTIONSJAS CENTER422 E COOPER AVEASPEN, CO 81611ISSUE: DATE: HPC REVIEW 3/16/23 3/16" = 1'-0" 1 Section 9 1,256.24 sf 216.47 sf 129.11 sf 7'-4"100'-5 3/4" 4'-4"10'-6" 22'-0" 25.25 sf 41.85 sf 16'-6"9'-9"9'-9"9'-9"8'-6"(WEST WALL - PROPOSED) 3'-4"5'-5"8'-0"10'-0"10'-0"5'-5"7'-11"10'-0"WEST WALL (PROPOSED) 411 SF = OPENING AREA (26 %) 1,527 SF = EXISTING WALL AREA (REMAINING WALL AREA) EAST WALL (PROPOSED) 139 SF = EXISTING OPENING AREA (8 %) 1,681 SF = EXISTING WALL AREA8'-0"3'-0" 8'-0"3'-7"ENTRY LEVEL 0" MAIN LEVEL 14'-3 1/2" 5-J4.3-J4-J3-J2-J1-JPL 2 PL 1 3/16" = 1'-0" 2 Section 10 100'-5 3/4" 1,526.9 sf 41.85 sf 9'-9"4'-4" (EAST WALL - PROPOSED) 25.01 sf 8'-0"3'-0" 72.29 sf 8'-6"8'-6" 17 DN DN DN DN OUTDOOR TERRACE OUTDOOR TERRACE ROOF OVER 1 STORY SPACE OUTDOOR TERRACE 210 FUTURE VENUE SPACE 208 FUTURE GREEN RM. 213 FUTURE CATERING KITCHEN 206 CORRIDOR 220 FUTURE WOMEN'S 204 FUTURE WINE LOCKER 218 FUTURE LOUNGE 207 FUTURE VESTIBULE 219 TERRACE 204 FUTURE LOBBY/ GALLERY 202 STAIR #1 205 ELEV. 203 MECH. CHASE 201 SHARED CORR. 205 STAIR #2 206 FUTURE J.C. 212 CORR. 211 FUTURE STORAGE 216 FUTURE STAGE SKYLIGHT ABOVE, TYP. NEW ROOF INFILL SKYLIGHT NEW RAILING NEW TERRACE FLOOR NEW LANDSCAPING NEW EXTERIOR WALL NEW FOLDING DOORS 180 PEOPLE EXIT CAPACITY INFILL FLOOR NEW WALL OPENING NEW WALL OPENING NEW WALL OPENING KITCHEN MECH. CHASE KITCHEN MECH. CHASE FIN. FLR. ELEV. OVER EXIST. KITCHEN 3 LAVS, 5 W.C.’S (RAISED FLOOR AREA) RAMP TO RESTROOMS, EXIT 3 LAVS, 5 W.C.’S (RAISED FLOOR AREA) FIN. FLR. ELEV. OF 414−420 BLDG. RAILING MECH. CHASE FOR LOBBY BELOW NEW FOLDING DOORS FRAMELESS DOORNEW WALL OPENING NEW WALL OPENING DONOR WALL ROLL−DOWN SECURITY GRILLE NEW FOLDING DOORS FUTURE COUNTER SEATING (RAISED FLOOR AREA) PROPOSED SKYLIGHT FUTURE MEN'S 203 FUTURE STORAGE 217 422-434 APPROVED DEVELOPMENT 422-434 APPROVED DEVELOPMENT Scale PROJECT NUMBER DATE DRAWN BY CHECKED BY modif. modif. 3/16" = 1’−0"8/1/2019 2:02:43 PMA−112B 2018−001 06−07−2019 COMPARISON SECOND FLOOR LEVEL414-422 E. COOPER AVE.REMODELASPEN, CO3/16" = 1'-0"1 EXISTING 2ND FLOOR 3/16" = 1'-0"2 PROPOSED 2ND FLOOR PLAN N NO.DATEBYREVISION107.31.19ISSUE TO LAND PLANNER100'-5 1/4"4'-6 1/2"4'-7 3/4"100'-5"17'-4 1/2"17'-5"4'-1 1/4"9'-8 3/4"10'-0"21'-10 1/2" WEST WALL (HPC APPROVED) 100' - 5" = WALL LENGTH 38' - 10" = WALL OPENING (39 %) ------------------------------------------------ 4' - 1" = OPENING 01 17' - 5" = OPENING 02 17' - 4" = OPENING 03 EAST WALL (HPC APPROVED) 100' - 5" = WALL LENGTH 19' - 8" = WALL OPENING (20 %) ------------------------------------------------ 9' - 8" = OPENING 01 10' - 0" = OPENING 02 7'-1/4"2'-10 1/4" 3'-9 1/4" 2'-10 1/4"3'-0"3'-0"3'-0"3'-0"3'-0"3'-0"3'-0"3'-0"WEST WALL (EXISTING) 100' - 5" = WALL LENGTH 16' - 5" = WALL OPENING (16 %) 28' - 5" = WALL OPENING (28 %) (INCLUDING FILLED IN WINDOWS) ------------------------------------------------ 7' - 0" = OPENING 01 2' - 10" = OPENING 02 3' - 9" = OPENING 03 2' - 10" = OPENING 04 EAST WALL (EXISTING) 100' - 5" = WALL LENGTH 24' - 0" = WALL OPENING (24 %) ------------------------------------------------ 3' - 0" = WINDOW OPENING (X 8) WINDOW WINDOW WINDOW WINDOW WINDOW WINDOW WINDOW WINDOW WINDOW WINDOW HPC APPROVAL (JULY 31, 2019)3'-0"WINDOW (FILLED IN)3'-0"3'-0"3'-0"WINDOW (FILLED IN) WINDOW (FILLED IN) WINDOW (FILLED IN) 18 2ND FLOOR F.F. 14’ −4 13/16" BASEMENT LEVEL −8’ −11 7/8" GROUND FLOOR 0’ −0’’ 7925.3’ 0’ −0" EXISTING SOUTH PARAPET 27’ −0" RED ONION PARAPET 32’ −6" RED ONION ROOF 29’ −0" HIGH POINT 36’ −5" 2ND FLOOR STRUCT. 13’ −0 13/16" AB TOP OF SKYLIGHT 31’ −6" PROPOSED NEW PARAPET 28’ −0" 420 E. COOPER EXISTING BASEMENT 015 420 TENANT SPACE 111 FUTURE VESTIBULE 219 416 TENANT SPACE 112 FUTURE VENUE SPACE 208 414 TENANT SPACE 113 PROPOSED SKYLIGHT PROPOSED SKYLIGHT OPEN, EXPOSED BUILDING STRUCTURE 1 A-302 1 A-301 MECH. SCREEN PORTION OF PROPOSED BUILDING WITHIN WHEELER VIEW PLANE ADJACENT BUILDING(N.I.C.) 408 E. COOPER AVE.5’ − 6"3 Z-003 2 Z-004 2ND FLOOR F.F. 14’ −4 13/16" BASEMENT LEVEL −8’ −11 7/8" GROUND FLOOR 0’ −0’’ 7925.3’ 0’ −0" EXISTING SOUTH PARAPET 27’ −0" RED ONION PARAPET 32’ −6" HIGH POINT 36’ −5" 2ND FLOOR STRUCT. 13’ −0 13/16" 1234567 TOP OF SKYLIGHT 31’ −6" PROPOSED NEW PARAPET 28’ −0" 2 A-302 FUTURE CATERING KITCHEN 206 FUTURE VENUE SPACE 208 OUTDOOR TERRACE 210 416 TENANT SPACE 112 TRASH & UTILITY AREA 115 PROPOSED SKYLIGHT, TYP. 414 TENANT SPACE 113 2 A-301 MECH. SCREEN PORTION OF PROPOSED BUILDING WITHIN WHEELER VIEW PLANE 2 Z-002 4 Z-002 Scale PROJECT NUMBER DATE DRAWN BY CHECKED BY modif. modif. 3/16" = 1’−0"8/1/2019 2:03:02 PMA−302 2018−001 06−07−2019 BUILDING SECTION414-422 E. COOPER AVE.REMODELASPEN, CO3/16" = 1'-0"2 BUILDING SECTION 3/16" = 1'-0"1 BUILDING SECTION NO.DATEBYREVISION107.31.19ISSUE TO LAND PLANNER1,368.04 sf 33.26 sf 140.61 sf140.61 sf 100'-5" SECTION 11 (WEST WALL - HPC APPROVED)8'-1"17'-5"17'-5"8'-1"8'-1"4'-1" WEST WALL (HPC APPROVED) 315 SF = OPENING AREA (21 %) 1,681 SF = EXISTING WALL AREA AB 2ND FLOOR F.F. 14’ −4 13/16" BASEMENT LEVEL −8’ −11 7/8" GROUND FLOOR 0’ −0’’ 7925.3’ 0’ −0" EXISTING SOUTH PARAPET 27’ −0" RED ONION PARAPET 32’ −6" HIGH POINT 36’ −5" 2ND FLOOR STRUCT. 13’ −0 13/16" 1234567 TOP OF SKYLIGHT 31’ −6" PROPOSED NEW PARAPET 28’ −0" 2 A-302 FUTURE CATERING KITCHEN 206 FUTURE VENUE SPACE 208 OUTDOOR TERRACE 210 416 TENANT SPACE 112 TRASH & UTILITY AREA 115 PROPOSED SKYLIGHT, TYP. 414 TENANT SPACE 113 2 A-301 MECH. SCREEN PORTION OF PROPOSED BUILDING WITHIN WHEELER VIEW PLANE 2 Z-002 4 Z-002 3/16" = 1'-0"1 BUILDING SECTION 100'-5" 3'-7" 103.4 sf 9'-8 3/4" SECTION 12 (EAST WALL - HPC APPROVED) EAST WALL (HPC APPROVED) 213 SF = OPENING AREA (13 %) 1,681 SF = EXISTING WALL AREA 109.6 sf 10'-0" OPEN, BUILDI OPEN, BUILDI G SOUTH PARAPET 27’ −0" 28’ −0" C.) ER AVE. G SOUTH PARAPET 27’ −0" 28’ −0" C.) ER AVE.14’ −4 13/16" 2ND FLOOR STRUCT. E" . ION ROOF 29’ −0" 31’ −6" OSED NEW PARAPET RED ONION ROOF 29’ −0" TOP OF SKYLIGHT 31’ −6" PROPOSED NEW PARAPET ION ROOF 29’ −0" 31’ −6" OSED NEW PARAPET RED ONION ROOF 29’ −0" TOP OF SKYLIGHT 31’ −6" PROPOSED NEW PARAPET ION ROOF 29’ −0" 31’ −6" OSED NEW PARAPET RED ONION ROOF 29’ −0" TOP OF SKYLIGHT 31’ −6" PROPOSED NEW PARAPET ION ROOF 29’ −0" 31’ −6" OSED NEW PARAPET RED ONION ROOF 29’ −0" TOP OF SKYLIGHT 31’ −6" PROPOSED NEW PARAPET ION ROOF 29’ −0" 31’ −6" OSED NEW PARAPET EXISTING SOUTH PARAPET 28’ −0" G SOUTH PARAPET 28’ −0" G SOUTH PARAPET 28’ −0" OPEN, EXPOSED BUILDING STRUCTURE OPEN, BUILDI OPEN, BUILDI G PA OPEN, EXPOSED BUILDING STRUCTURE OPEN, BUILDI OPEN, BUILDI G PA 5-J4.3-J4-J3-J2-J1-JPL 2 PL 1 100'-5 3/4" 1,526.9 sf 1,473.44 sf 10'-10"10'-10"19 CHARLES CUNNIFFE ARCHITECTS COPYRIGHT CHARLES CUNNIFFE ARCHITECTSC 610 EAST HYMAN AVE. ASPEN, CO 81611 TEL: 970.925.5590 FAX: 970.920.4557 cunniffe.com SHEET NO. JOB NO.3/13/2023 1:38:52 PMA2.2 1825 MAIN LEVEL FLOOR PLANJAS CENTER422 E COOPER AVEASPEN, CO 81611ISSUE: DATE: HVAC & PLUMBING 01/16/23 CVR The JAS Center will be preserving the history of both the Red Onion and the the musicians that have performed there. (Billie Holiday, Aspen - 1952) JAS Center, Upper Level, West Wall - There is no evidence of filled in openings. JAS Center, Upper Level, East Wall - There is no evidence of filled in openings. UP A6.2 1 A6.1 1 54"39"5-J 5-J 4.3-J 4.3-J 4-J 4-J 3-J 3-J 2-J 2-J 1-J 1-J PL 2 PL 2 PL 1 PL 1 PL 4 PL 4 PL 3 PL 3 A-J A-J B-J B-J B.3-J B.3-J B.7-J B.7-J B.9-J B.9-J C-J C-J A6.3 1 A6.5 1 A7.1 A6.6 1 30"48"36" 60"42"78"54"48"36"60"54" A6.4 14'-8 7/8"can we try to push this window back for a deeper sill? 1 INCLINED PLATFORM LIFT A7.2 3 A7.12 A7.1 3 VIP LOUNGE 204 GREEN ROOM 206 RECORDING STUDIO 207 ISO ROOM 207B SOUND LOCK 207A WOMEN'S RR 210 KITCHEN 212 WALK-IN COOLER 212A MEN'S RR 213 JAN. CLO. 213A STORAGE205BSTORAGE205CSTAGE 205A OUTDOOR TERRACE 214 BAR 203 A/V 205D VENUE 205 STORAGE 211A GALLERY CORRIDOR 211 UPPER LEVEL GALLERY 201 WAIT STATION 205E 2 A6.8 1 1 DRY STORAGE209PRIVATE COMMODE 206A FURNITURE STORAGE 208 STORAGE 202 6 CHARLES CUNNIFFE ARCHITECTS COPYRIGHT CHARLES CUNNIFFE ARCHITECTSC 610 EAST HYMAN AVE. ASPEN, CO 81611 TEL: 970.925.5590 FAX: 970.920.4557 cunniffe.com SHEET NO. JOB NO.3/13/2023 1:38:52 PMA2.2 1825 MAIN LEVEL FLOOR PLANJAS CENTER422 E COOPER AVEASPEN, CO 81611NORTH 3/16" = 1'-0" 1 MAIN LEVEL FLOOR PLAN ISSUE: DATE: HVAC & PLUMBING 01/16/23100'-5 1/4"21'-7 1/2"4'-4"3'-0"8'-6"EAST WALL (PROPOSED) 100' - 5" = WALL LENGTH 15' - 10" = WALL OPENING (24'-0" EXISTING) ------------------------------------------------ 4' - 4" = OPENING 01 3' - 0" = OPENING 02 8' - 6" = OPENING 03 16'-6"22'-0"4'-4"WEST WALL (PROPOSED) 100' - 5" = WALL LENGTH 45' - 10" = WALL OPENING (18'-5" EXISTING) ------------------------------------------------ 3' - 0" = OPENING 01 4' - 4" = OPENING 02 0' - 0" = OPENING 03 22' - 0" = OPENING 04 16' - 6" = OPENING 05 PL ALK-IN COOLE 212A 3'-0"DRY STORAGECHASE CHASEFURNITURE STORAGE GALLERYNGTHGHTENING (16.7%)----------------STORAGE (KITCHEN OR CHAIRS)WOM GALLERY RRUPPER LEVEL PLAN (PROPOSED)8'-0"7'-1"2'-10"2'-10"2'-10"2'-10"3'-0"3'-0"3'-0"3'-0"3'-0"3'-0"3'-0"3'-0"EXISTING OPENINGS IN BRICK (TYP.) PROPOSED OPENINGS IN BRICK (TYP.) BRICK WALLS 3'-0" ENTRY LEVEL 0" MAIN LEVEL 14'-3 1/2" 5-J4.3-J4-J3-J2-J1-JPL 2 PL 1 9' - 6 1/8"CHARLES CUNNIFFE ARCHITECTS COPYRIGHT CHARLES CUNNIFFE ARCHITECTSC 610 EAST HYMAN AVE. ASPEN, CO 81611 TEL: 970.925.5590 FAX: 970.920.4557 cunniffe.com SHEET NO. JOB NO.3/16/2023 12:08:17 PMA4.1 1825 BUILDING SECTIONSJAS CENTER422 E COOPER AVEASPEN, CO 81611ISSUE: DATE: HPC REVIEW 3/16/23 3/16" = 1'-0" 1 Section 9 1,256.24 sf 216.47 sf 129.11 sf 100'-5 3/4" 4'-4" 22'-0" 25.25 sf 41.85 sf 9'-9"9'-9"9'-9"8'-6"(WEST WALL - PROPOSED) 3'-4"5'-5"8'-0"10'-0"10'-0"5'-5"7'-11"10'-0"WEST WALL (PROPOSED) 411 SF = OPENING AREA (26 %) 1,527 SF = EXISTING WALL AREA 152 SF = EXISTING OPENINGS 8'-0"3'-0"8'-0"3'-7"ENTRY LEVEL 0" MAIN LEVEL 14'-3 1/2" 5-J4.3-J4-J3-J2-J1-JPL 2 PL 1 3/16" = 1'-0" 2 Section 10 100'-5 3/4" 1,526.9 sf 41.85 sf 9'-9"4'-4" (EAST WALL - PROPOSED) 25.01 sf 8'-0"3'-0" 72.29 sf 8'-6"8'-6" 39'-6" 60.24 sf 7'-1"8'-6"11'-2"10'-9" 32 sf 3'-9"8'-6"5'-10" 16'-6" 10'-1" 13'-0"7'-9"9'-11"7'-7"9'-11"14'-10 3/4"7'-9"7'-7" 20 sf 3'-0"8'-6"20 sf 2'-10"8'-6"20 sf 3'-0"8'-6"20 sf 3'-0"8'-6"20 sf 3'-0"8'-6"20 sf 3'-0"8'-6"20 sf 3'-0"8'-6"20 sf 3'-0"8'-6"20 sf 3'-0"8'-6"PROPOSED OPENINGS IN BRICK (TYP.) EXISTING OPENINGS IN BRICK (TYP.) PROPOSED OPENINGS IN BRICK (TYP.) 20 sf 2'-10"8'-6"20 sf 2'-10"8'-6"EXISTING OPENINGS IN BRICK (TYP.) BRICK WALL BRICK WALL 7'-7" 20 sf 3'-0"8'-6"EAST WALL (PROPOSED) 139 SF = OPENING AREA (8 %) 1,681 SF = EXISTING WALL AREA 180 SF = EXISTING OPENINGS DN DN DN DN OUTDOOR TERRACE OUTDOOR TERRACE ROOF OVER 1 STORY SPACE OUTDOOR TERRACE 210 FUTURE VENUE SPACE 208 FUTURE GREEN RM. 213 FUTURE CATERING KITCHEN 206 CORRIDOR 220 FUTURE WOMEN'S 204 FUTURE WINE LOCKER 218 FUTURE LOUNGE 207 FUTURE VESTIBULE 219 TERRACE 204 FUTURE LOBBY/ GALLERY 202 STAIR #1 205 ELEV. 203 MECH. CHASE 201 SHARED CORR. 205 STAIR #2 206 FUTURE J.C. 212 CORR. 211 FUTURE STORAGE 216 FUTURE STAGE SKYLIGHT ABOVE, TYP. NEW ROOF INFILL SKYLIGHT NEW RAILING NEW TERRACE FLOOR NEW LANDSCAPING NEW EXTERIOR WALL NEW FOLDING DOORS 180 PEOPLE EXIT CAPACITY INFILL FLOOR NEW WALL OPENING NEW WALL OPENING NEW WALL OPENING KITCHEN MECH. CHASE KITCHEN MECH. CHASE FIN. FLR. ELEV. OVER EXIST. KITCHEN 3 LAVS, 5 W.C.’S (RAISED FLOOR AREA) RAMP TO RESTROOMS, EXIT 3 LAVS, 5 W.C.’S (RAISED FLOOR AREA) FIN. FLR. ELEV. OF 414−420 BLDG. RAILING MECH. CHASE FOR LOBBY BELOW NEW FOLDING DOORS FRAMELESS DOORNEW WALL OPENING NEW WALL OPENING DONOR WALL ROLL−DOWN SECURITY GRILLE NEW FOLDING DOORS FUTURE COUNTER SEATING (RAISED FLOOR AREA) PROPOSED SKYLIGHT FUTURE MEN'S 203 FUTURE STORAGE 217 422-434 APPROVED DEVELOPMENT 422-434 APPROVED DEVELOPMENT Scale PROJECT NUMBER DATE DRAWN BY CHECKED BY modif. modif. 3/16" = 1’−0"8/1/2019 2:02:43 PMA−112B 2018−001 06−07−2019 COMPARISON SECOND FLOOR LEVEL414-422 E. COOPER AVE.REMODELASPEN, CO3/16" = 1'-0"1 EXISTING 2ND FLOOR 3/16" = 1'-0"2 PROPOSED 2ND FLOOR PLAN N NO.DATEBYREVISION107.31.19ISSUE TO LAND PLANNER100'-5 1/4"100'-5"17'-4 1/2"17'-5"4'-1 1/4"9'-8 3/4"10'-0"21'-10 1/2" WEST WALL (HPC APPROVED) 100' - 5" = WALL LENGTH 38' - 10" = WALL OPENING ------------------------------------------------ 4' - 1" = OPENING 01 17' - 5" = OPENING 02 17' - 4" = OPENING 03 EAST WALL (HPC APPROVED) 100' - 5" = WALL LENGTH 19' - 8" = WALL OPENING ------------------------------------------------ 9' - 8" = OPENING 01 10' - 0" = OPENING 02 7'-1" 2'-10" 3'-9 1/4" 3'-0" WEST WALL (EXISTING) 100' - 5" = WALL LENGTH 19' - 4" = WALL OPENING ------------------------------------------------ 7' - 1" = OPENING 01 2' - 10" = OPENING 02 3' - 9" = OPENING 03 2' - 10" = OPENING 04 2' - 10" = OPENING 05 EAST WALL (EXISTING) 100' - 5" = WALL LENGTH 27' - 0" = WALL OPENING ------------------------------------------------ 3' - 0" = WINDOW OPENING (X 9) WINDOW (8'-6" HEAD, 1'-5" SILL) HPC APPROVAL (JULY 31, 2019) DOOR (8'-6" HEAD) 2'-10" 2'-10"14'-10 3/4"7'-9"3'-0"7'-7"3'-0"13'-0"3'-0"7'-9"3'-0"9'-11"3'-0"7'-7"3'-0"9'-11"3'-0"39'-6"11'-2"10'-9"5'-10"10'-1"DOOR (8'-6" HEAD) WINDOW (8'-6" HEAD, 1'-5" SILL) WINDOW (8'-6" HEAD, 1'-5" SILL) WINDOW (8'-6" HEAD, 1'-10" SILL) WINDOW (8'-6" HEAD, 1'-10" SILL) WINDOW (8'-6" HEAD, 1'-10" SILL) WINDOW (8'-6" HEAD, 1'-10" SILL) WINDOW (8'-6" HEAD, 1'-10" SILL) WINDOW (8'-6" HEAD, 1'-10" SILL) WINDOW (8'-6" HEAD, 1'-10" SILL) WINDOW (8'-6" HEAD, 1'-10" SILL)7'-7"3'-0" WINDOW (8'-6" HEAD, 1'-10" SILL) 2ND FLOOR F.F. 14’ −4 13/16" BASEMENT LEVEL −8’ −11 7/8" GROUND FLOOR 0’ −0’’ 7925.3’ 0’ −0" EXISTING SOUTH PARAPET 27’ −0" RED ONION PARAPET 32’ −6" RED ONION ROOF 29’ −0" HIGH POINT 36’ −5" 2ND FLOOR STRUCT. 13’ −0 13/16" AB TOP OF SKYLIGHT 31’ −6" PROPOSED NEW PARAPET 28’ −0" 420 E. COOPER EXISTING BASEMENT 015 420 TENANT SPACE 111 FUTURE VESTIBULE 219 416 TENANT SPACE 112 FUTURE VENUE SPACE 208 414 TENANT SPACE 113 PROPOSED SKYLIGHT PROPOSED SKYLIGHT OPEN, EXPOSED BUILDING STRUCTURE 1 A-302 1 A-301 MECH. SCREEN PORTION OF PROPOSED BUILDING WITHIN WHEELER VIEW PLANE ADJACENT BUILDING(N.I.C.) 408 E. COOPER AVE.5’ − 6"3 Z-003 2 Z-004 2ND FLOOR F.F. 14’ −4 13/16" BASEMENT LEVEL −8’ −11 7/8" GROUND FLOOR 0’ −0’’ 7925.3’ 0’ −0" EXISTING SOUTH PARAPET 27’ −0" RED ONION PARAPET 32’ −6" HIGH POINT 36’ −5" 2ND FLOOR STRUCT. 13’ −0 13/16" 1234567 TOP OF SKYLIGHT 31’ −6" PROPOSED NEW PARAPET 28’ −0" 2 A-302 FUTURE CATERING KITCHEN 206 FUTURE VENUE SPACE 208 OUTDOOR TERRACE 210 416 TENANT SPACE 112 TRASH & UTILITY AREA 115 PROPOSED SKYLIGHT, TYP. 414 TENANT SPACE 113 2 A-301 MECH. SCREEN PORTION OF PROPOSED BUILDING WITHIN WHEELER VIEW PLANE 2 Z-002 4 Z-002 Scale PROJECT NUMBER DATE DRAWN BY CHECKED BY modif. modif. 3/16" = 1’−0"8/1/2019 2:03:02 PMA−302 2018−001 06−07−2019 BUILDING SECTION414-422 E. COOPER AVE.REMODELASPEN, CO3/16" = 1'-0"2 BUILDING SECTION 3/16" = 1'-0"1 BUILDING SECTION NO.DATEBYREVISION107.31.19ISSUE TO LAND PLANNER1,368.04 sf 33.26 sf 140.61 sf140.61 sf 100'-5" SECTION 11 (WEST WALL - HPC APPROVED)8'-1"17'-5"17'-5"8'-1"8'-1"4'-1" WEST WALL (HPC APPROVED) 315 SF = OPENING AREA 1,681 SF = EXISTING WALL AREA AB 2ND FLOOR F.F. 14’ −4 13/16" BASEMENT LEVEL −8’ −11 7/8" GROUND FLOOR 0’ −0’’ 7925.3’ 0’ −0" EXISTING SOUTH PARAPET 27’ −0" RED ONION PARAPET 32’ −6" HIGH POINT 36’ −5" 2ND FLOOR STRUCT. 13’ −0 13/16" 1234567 TOP OF SKYLIGHT 31’ −6" PROPOSED NEW PARAPET 28’ −0" 2 A-302 FUTURE CATERING KITCHEN 206 FUTURE VENUE SPACE 208 OUTDOOR TERRACE 210 416 TENANT SPACE 112 TRASH & UTILITY AREA 115 PROPOSED SKYLIGHT, TYP. 414 TENANT SPACE 113 2 A-301 MECH. SCREEN PORTION OF PROPOSED BUILDING WITHIN WHEELER VIEW PLANE 2 Z-002 4 Z-002 3/16" = 1'-0"1 BUILDING SECTION 100'-5" 3'-7" 103.4 sf 9'-8 3/4" SECTION 12 (EAST WALL - HPC APPROVED) EAST WALL (HPC APPROVED) 213 SF = OPENING AREA 1,681 SF = EXISTING WALL AREA 109.6 sf 10'-0" OPEN, BUILDI OPEN, BUILDI G SOUTH PARAPET 27’ −0" 28’ −0" C.) ER AVE. G SOUTH PARAPET 27’ −0" 28’ −0" C.) ER AVE.14’ −4 13/16" 2ND FLOOR STRUCT. E" . ION ROOF 29’ −0" 31’ −6" OSED NEW PARAPET RED ONION ROOF 29’ −0" TOP OF SKYLIGHT 31’ −6" PROPOSED NEW PARAPET ION ROOF 29’ −0" 31’ −6" OSED NEW PARAPET RED ONION ROOF 29’ −0" TOP OF SKYLIGHT 31’ −6" PROPOSED NEW PARAPET ION ROOF 29’ −0" 31’ −6" OSED NEW PARAPET RED ONION ROOF 29’ −0" TOP OF SKYLIGHT 31’ −6" PROPOSED NEW PARAPET ION ROOF 29’ −0" 31’ −6" OSED NEW PARAPET RED ONION ROOF 29’ −0" TOP OF SKYLIGHT 31’ −6" PROPOSED NEW PARAPET ION ROOF 29’ −0" 31’ −6" OSED NEW PARAPET EXISTING SOUTH PARAPET 28’ −0" G SOUTH PARAPET 28’ −0" G SOUTH PARAPET 28’ −0" OPEN, EXPOSED BUILDING STRUCTURE OPEN, BUILDI OPEN, BUILDI G PA OPEN, EXPOSED BUILDING STRUCTURE OPEN, BUILDI OPEN, BUILDI G PA 5-J4.3-J4-J3-J2-J1-JPL 2 PL 1 100'-5 3/4" 1,526.9 sf 1,473.44 sf 10'-10"10'-10" HPC PROJECT MONITORS -projects in bold are permitted or under construction 4/7/2023 Kara Thompson 931 Gibson 300 E. Hyman 201 E. Main 333 W. Bleeker 234 W. Francis Skier’s Chalet Steakhouse 423 N. Second 135 E. Cooper 101 W. Main (Molly Gibson Lodge) 720 E. Hyman 304 E. Hopkins 930 King 312 W. Hyman 520 E. Cooper Jeff Halferty 533 W. Hallam 110 W. Main, Hotel Aspen 134 E. Bleeker 300 E. Hyman 434 E. Cooper, Bidwell 414-420 E. Cooper, Red Onion/JAS 517 E. Hopkins Lift 1 corridor ski lift support structure 227 E. Bleeker 211 W. Hopkins 211 W. Main 204 S. Galena 215 E. Hallam 500 E. Durant 413 E. Main Roger Moyer 300 W. Main 227 E. Main 110 Neale 517 E. Hopkins Skier’s Chalet Lodge 202 E. Main 305-307 S. Mill, Grey Lady 320 E. Hyman (Wheeler Opera House, solar panels) 611 W. Main 132 W. Hopkins 500 E. Durant Sheri Sanzone 110 W. Main, Hotel Aspen 209 E. Bleeker 820 E. Cooper 125 W. Main Skier’s Chalet Steakhouse Skier’s Chalet Lodge Lift One Park 423 N. Second 121 W. Bleeker 20 HPC PROJECT MONITORS -projects in bold are permitted or under construction 4/7/2023 Jodi Surfas 202 E. Main 305-307 S. Mill, Grey Lady 320 E. Hyman (Wheeler Opera House, solar panels) 611 W. Main 602 E. Hyman Peter Fornell 304 E. Hopkins 930 King 135 W. Francis 233 W. Bleeker Barb Pitchford 121 W. Bleeker 312 W. Hyman 132 W. Hopkins 21 Page 1 of 5 427 Rio Grande Place, Aspen, CO 81611 | cityofaspen.com Memorandum TO: Aspen Historic Preservation Commission FROM: Amy Simon, Planning Director MEETING DATE: April 12, 2023 RE: 214 W. Bleeker Street– Minor Development, Relocation and Variation Review, PUBLIC HEARING APPLICANT /OWNER: 214 W. Bleeker Holdings LLC, 1558 Kirby Drive, Houston, TX 77019 REPRESENTATIVE: Ro Rocket Design LOCATION: Street Address: 214 W. Bleeker Street Legal Description: The east 10 feet of Lot N, all of Lot O, and the west 20 feet of Lot P, Block 50, City and Townsite of Aspen, Colorado Parcel Identification Number: 2735-124-35-005 CURRENT ZONING & USE R-6, Medium Density residential; Single family home PROPOSED ZONING & USE: No change SUMMARY: 214 W. Bleeker is a landmarked property containing a Victorian era home with an early 1990s addition, and a historic shed. The applicant plans to lift the entire existing home, construct a new basement, and undertake alterations to the exterior of the structure and to the site. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff has identified a number of aspects of the project that require restudy to best preserve the two historic buildings on the site. Continuation to develop revisions to the project is recommended. Site Locator Map – 214 W. Bleeker 214 22 Page 2 of 5 427 Rio Grande Place, Aspen, CO 81611 | cityofaspen.com BACKGROUND: Below are an early 20th century photo of the home from the archives of the Aspen Historical Society, and a 2015 picture of the property. The historic resource is fairly intact, although the existing addition appears to have removed the rear section of the original home. The historic chimney is one of the few substantial Victorian era chimneys remaining on a resource like this one in Aspen. REQUEST OF HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION (HPC): The Applicant is requesting the following approvals: • Minor Development (Section 26.415.070.C) for alterations to the exterior features of the structures and site. • Relocation (Section 26.415.090) to move the historic resource onto a new basement. • Setback Variations (Section 26.415.110.C) for the excavation of basement space in the setbacks while the historic resource remains in its historic location. The Historic Preservation Commission (HPC) is the final review authority. The scope of this application is subject to Notice of Call-Up at City Council. STAFF REVIEW: According to the Aspen Municipal Code, the procedures for the review of minor development, relocation and variation projects are as follows: 1) Staff shall review the submittal material and prepare a report that analyzes the project's conformance with the design guidelines and other applicable Land Use Code sections. This report will be transmitted to the HPC with relevant information on the proposed project and a recommendation to approve, disapprove or approve with conditions and 23 Page 3 of 5 427 Rio Grande Place, Aspen, CO 81611 | cityofaspen.com the reasons for the recommendation. The HPC will review the application, the report and the evidence presented at the hearing to determine the project's conformance with the City Historic Preservation Design Guidelines. 2) The HPC shall approve, disapprove, approve with conditions or continue the application to obtain additional information necessary to make a decision to approve or deny. If the application is approved, the HPC shall issue a certificate of appropriateness and the Community Development Director shall issue a development order. In preparation for this review, staff referred the application to the Parks Department and the Zoning Division. Each had comments that affect HPC’s decisions. Regarding Parks, there is a large cottonwood tree at the front of the property and the historic resource sits in its dripline. A crawlspace already exists below the resource, but the proposed full basement excavation in that area cannot proceed until Parks and the applicant’s forestry expert have concluded investigation of the health of the tree. Parks requires air spading to view the roots of the tree and a canopy inspection. The application before HPC presumes that tree removal will be permitted. Until that is confirmed, any approval to lift this home and place it on a new fully excavated basement needs to be conditioned on Parks Department approval. It may be that the basement cannot be deeper than existing within the area of the dripline. A condition of approval to this effect will be needed. Regarding Zoning, referral comments identified setback variations needed to lift the house and place it back where it sits now, and indicated some errors in floor area calculations that the applicant has addressed in the packet before the board. Unfortunately, one error was only realized during preparation of this packet, which is that the architect did not include a historic shed along the alley as countable floor area as required. Direction is needed on some other decisions related to that shed, so staff has still brought the application forward for HPC to begin discussion. The shed is not proposed for demolition. The floor area of the house will either need to be reduced to cover the shed, which appears to be approximately 80 square feet in size, or a floor area bonus request and justification will need to be presented in a revision to the application. The exhibits attached to this memo identify the review criteria and design guidelines to be considered for this Minor Development, Relocation and Variations review. From a design review perspective, staff finds that more information is needed on the front walkway to the resource to assure that it is an appropriate width and material for the context of the building. A review of civil drawings is needed to ensure that drywells or other necessary features are not visually intrusive adjacent to historic structures. A proposed 6’ tall fence towards the front of the historic resource could be softened or reduced in height on the south elevation to provide privacy while still allowing some views of the sides of the resource. Assurance of the careful reconstruction of the historic chimney is needed, along with an explanation as to how any new gas fireplace in the home will be vented. More information is needed as to whether siding and other materials on the exterior of the house are original. While the scope of work related to the existing non-historic addition appears to be primarily limited to alterations to doors and windows, staff recommends the applicant consider removing any Victorian inspired detailing on the addition, such as fishscale shingles and 24 Page 4 of 5 427 Rio Grande Place, Aspen, CO 81611 | cityofaspen.com decorative eave boards, that they are willing to incorporate into their scope in order to better highlight and distinguish the resource from the addition. Because re-roofing of the house is proposed, staff recommends consideration be given to roofing the historic resource with shingles, but the addition with metal. Staff does not support the design of a new window, shown at right, on the street-facing façade of the addition due to it’s incompatible height relationship to the Victorian. The Relocation plan needs additional study, particularly with regard to the impact on the historic shed mentioned above. The shed appears to be in its original location and is within approximately 1’ of the non-historic addition made to this home in the 1990s. (Please note that this addition was reviewed and approved by HPC in 1991.) There does not seem to be adequate room to safely lift the main home without impact on the shed and there are potentially building code implications to having these structures be so close together that would require alterations to protect from the spread of fire from one structure to another. The shed also sits partly into the alley, which may be subjecting it to damage, and staff is uncertain whether the building is being adequately maintained to ensure its preservation. Restudy is needed and may include shifting this structure onto the property and slightly eastward. As mentioned above, a floor area bonus may be proposed and may be justified by efforts to better preserve this outbuilding. If a floor area bonus is requested, other restoration opportunities related to the front porch on the resource should also be studied as it appears that some of the details may not be original. An additional relocation topic that needs further review is the relationship of the historic resource to grade, and the foundation treatment. Historic photos indicate that there were steps up to the porch and an exposed sandstone foundation. The foundation is minimally visible now, either due to settling or past alterations. The proposal sets the house very close to grade and indicates a metal flashing detail on the foundation. More information on the existing conditions and opportunities for restoration are needed. Finally, the application includes requests for setback variations. Staff finds that variations are appropriate to maintain the existing location of the historic home, and to accommodate the existing or revised location of the shed. Exact variations should be determined after topics mentioned above are restudied. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends the Historic Preservation Commission (HPC) continue this application for continued investigation of how the cottonwood tree at the front of the site affects the project, restudy of the floor area (including a possible floor area bonus request) needed to accommodate the historic shed, further detail on the design of the front walkway and any stormwater management features, restudy of the south face of the new fence, clarification of flue locations, 25 Page 5 of 5 427 Rio Grande Place, Aspen, CO 81611 | cityofaspen.com further analysis of the historic materials on the exterior of the historic resource, analysis of opportunities to better distinguish the addition from the Victorian through material choices, a more compatible sizing of Window 213, better preservation of the historic shed, historically appropriate treatment of the foundation on the historic home, and appropriate setback variations. ATTACHMENTS: Resolution #____, Series of 2023 Exhibit A – Historic Preservation Design Guidelines Staff Findings Exhibit B – Relocation Exhibit C – Setback Variations Exhibit D – Application 26 HPC Resolution #X, Series of 2023 Page 1 of 3 RESOLUTION #X, SERIES OF 2023 A RESOLUTION OF THE ASPEN HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION (HPC) GRANTING MINOR DEVELOPMENT, RELOCATION AND VARIATION REVIEW FOR THE PROPERTY LOCATED AT 214 W. BLEEKER STREET, THE EAST 10 FEET OF LOT N, ALL OF LOT O, AND THE WEST 20 FEET OF LOT P, BLOCK 50, CITY AND TOWNSITE OF ASPEN, COLORADO PARCEL ID: 2735-124-35-005 WHEREAS, the applicant, 214 W. Bleeker Holdings LLC, represented by Ro Rockett Design, has requested HPC approval for Minor Development, Relocation and Variations for the property located at 214 W. Bleeker Street, the east 10 feet of Lot N, all of Lot O, and the west 20 feet of Lot P, Block 50, City and Townsite of Aspen, Colorado; and WHEREAS, Section 26.415.070 of the Municipal Code states that “no building or structure shall be erected, constructed, enlarged, altered, repaired, relocated or improved involving a designated historic property or district until plans or sufficient information have been submitted to the Community Development Director and approved in accordance with the procedures established for their review;” and WHEREAS, for Minor Development Review, the HPC must review the application, a staff analysis report and the evidence presented at a hearing to determine the project’s conformance with the City of Aspen Historic Preservation Design Guidelines per Section 26.415.070.C of the Municipal Code and other applicable Code Sections. The HPC may approve, disapprove, approve with conditions or continue the application to obtain additional information necessary to make a decision to approve or deny; and WHEREAS, for approval of Relocation, the application shall meet the requirements of Aspen Municipal Code Section 26.415.090.C, Relocation of a Designated Property; and WHEREAS, for approval of Setback Variations, the application shall meet the requirements of Aspen Municipal Code Section 26.415.110.C, Setback Variations; and WHEREAS, as a historic landmark, the site is exempt from Residential Design Standards review; and WHEREAS, Community Development Department staff reviewed the application for compliance with applicable review standards and recommended continuation for restudy; and WHEREAS, HPC reviewed the project on April 12, 2023. HPC considered the application, the staff memo and public comment, and found the proposal consistent with the review standards and granted approval as proposed by a vote of __ to __. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED: 27 HPC Resolution #X, Series of 2023 Page 2 of 3 Section 1: Approval That HPC hereby approves Minor Development, Relocation and Variations for 214 W. Bleeker with the following conditions: 1. As part of the approval to relocate the house on the site, the applicant will be required to provide a financial security of $30,000 until the house is set on the new foundation. The financial security is to be provided with the building permit application, along with a detailed description of the house relocation approach. 2. The crawl space below the historic resource may not be excavated any deeper without approval of the Parks Department, in order to avoid damage to the roots of an adjacent cottonwood tree. The full depth basement may need to be held back some distance that is yet to be determined. 3. The chimney will require careful documentation in order to be authentically reconstructed after the house move. 4. The following setbacks are approved: 5. (Additional conditions to be determined). Section 2: Material Representations All material representations and commitments made by the Applicant pursuant to the development proposal approvals as herein awarded, whether in public hearing or documentation presented before the Community Development Department, the Historic Preservation Commission, or the Aspen City Council are hereby incorporated in such plan development approvals and the same shall be complied with as if fully set forth herein, unless amended by other specific conditions or an authorized authority. Section 3: Existing Litigation This Resolution shall not affect any existing litigation and shall not operate as an abatement of any action or proceeding now pending under or by virtue of the ordinances repealed or amended as herein provided, and the same shall be conducted and concluded under such prior ordinances. Section 4: Severability If any section, subsection, sentence, clause, phrase, or portion of this Resolution is for any reason held invalid or unconstitutional in a court of competent jurisdiction, such portion shall be deemed a separate, distinct and independent provision and shall not affect the validity of the remaining portions thereof. Section 5: Vested Rights The development approvals granted herein shall constitute a site-specific development plan vested for a period of three (3) years from the date of issuance of a development order. However, any failure to abide by any of the terms and conditions attendant to this approval shall result in the forfeiture of said vested property rights. Unless otherwise exempted or extended, failure to properly record all plats and agreements required to be recorded, as specified herein, within 180 days of the effective date of the development order shall also result in the forfeiture of said vested property rights and shall render the development order void within the meaning of Section 26.104.050 (Void permits). Zoning that is not part of the approved site-specific development plan shall not result in the creation of a vested property right. 28 HPC Resolution #X, Series of 2023 Page 3 of 3 No later than fourteen (14) days following final approval of all requisite reviews necessary to obtain a development order as set forth in this Ordinance, the City Clerk shall cause to be published in a newspaper of general circulation within the jurisdictional boundaries of the City of Aspen, a notice advising the general public of the approval of a site specific development plan and creation of a vested property right pursuant to this Title. Such notice shall be substantially in the following form: Notice is hereby given to the general public of the approval of a site specific development plan, and the creation of a vested property right, valid for a period of three (3) years, pursuant to the Land Use Code of the City of Aspen and Title 24, Article 68, Colorado Revised Statutes, pertaining to the following described property: 214 W. Bleeker Street. Nothing in this approval shall exempt the development order from subsequent reviews and approvals required by this approval of the general rules, regulations and ordinances or the City of Aspen provided that such reviews and approvals are not inconsistent with this approval. The approval granted hereby shall be subject to all rights of referendum and judicial review; the period of time permitted by law for the exercise of such rights shall not begin to run until the date of publication of the notice of final development approval as required under Section 26.304.070(A). The rights of referendum shall be limited as set forth in the Colorado Constitution and the Aspen Home Rule Charter. APPROVED BY THE COMMISSION at its regular meeting on the 12th day of April, 2023. Approved as to Form: Approved as to Content: ________________________________ ________________________________ Katharine Johnson, Assistant City Attorney Kara Thompson, Chair ATTEST: ________________________________ Mike Sear, Deputy City Clerk 29 Exhibit A Minor Development Historic Preservation Design Guidelines Staff Findings Page 1 of 9 26.415.070. Development involving designated historic property or property within a historic district. No building, structure or landscape shall be erected, constructed, enlarged, altered, repaired, relocated or improved involving a designated historic property or a property located within a Historic District until plans or sufficient information have been submitted to the Community Development Director and approved in accordance with the procedures established for their review. An application for a building permit cannot be submitted without a development order. 26.415.070.C Minor Development 3. The procedures for the review of minor development projects are as follows: b) Staff shall review the submittal material and prepare a report that analyzes the project's conformance with the design guidelines and other applicable Land Use Code sections. This report will be transmitted to the HPC with relevant information on the proposed project and a recommendation to approve, disapprove or approve with conditions and the reasons for the recommendation. The HPC will review the application, the report and the evidence presented at the hearing to determine the project's conformance with the City Historic Preservation Design Guidelines. c) The HPC shall approve, disapprove, approve with conditions or continue the application to obtain additional information necessary to make a decision to approve or deny. If the application is approved, the HPC shall issue a certificate of appropriateness and the Community Development Director shall issue a development order. Relevant Historic Preservation Design Guidelines for Conceptual Review of this application (PLEASE NOTE THAT GUIDELINES WHICH REQUIRE STUDY FOR COMPLIANCE ARE HIGHLIGHTED): 1.1 All projects shall respect the historic development pattern or context of the block, neighborhood or district. • Building footprint and location should reinforce the traditional patterns of the neighborhood. • Allow for some porosity on a site. In a residential project, setback to setback development is typically uncharacteristic of the historic context. Do not design a project which leaves no useful open space visible from the street. 1.5 Maintain the historic hierarchy of spaces. • Reflect the established progression of public to private spaces from the public sidewalk to a semi-public walkway, to a semi private entry feature, to private spaces. 1.6 Provide a simple walkway running perpendicular from the street to the front entry on residential projects. 30 Exhibit A Minor Development Historic Preservation Design Guidelines Staff Findings Page 2 of 9 • Meandering walkways are not allowed, except where it is needed to avoid a tree or is typical of the period of significance. • Use paving materials that are similar to those used historically for the building style and install them in the manner that they would have been used historically. For example on an Aspen Victorian landmark set flagstone pavers in sand, rather than in concrete. Light grey concrete, brick or red sandstone are appropriate private walkway materials for most landmarks. • The width of a new entry sidewalk should generally be three feet or less for residential properties. A wider sidewalk may be appropriate for an AspenModern property. 1.7 Provide positive open space within a project site. • Ensure that open space on site is meaningful and consolidated into a few large spaces rather than many small unusable areas. • Open space should be designed to support and complement the historic building. 1.8 Consider stormwater quality needs early in the design process. • When included in the initial planning for a project, stormwater quality facilities can be better integrated into the proposal. All landscape plans presented for HPC review must include at least a preliminary representation of the stormwater design. A more detailed design must be reviewed and approved by Planning and Engineering prior to building permit submittal. • Site designs and stormwater management should provide positive drainage away from the historic landmark, preserve the use of natural drainage and treatment systems of the site, reduce the generation of additional stormwater runoff, and increase infiltration into the ground. Stormwater facilities and conveyances located in front of a landmark should have minimal visual impact when viewed from the public right of way. • Refer to City Engineering for additional guidance and requirements. 1.10 Built-in furnishings, such as water features, fire pits, grills, and hot tubs, that could interfere with or block views of historic structures are inappropriate. • Site furnishings that are added to the historic property should not be intrusive or degrade the integrity of the neighborhood patterns, site, or existing historic landscape. • Consolidating and screening these elements is preferred. 1.11 Preserve and maintain historically significant landscaping on site, particularly landmark trees and shrubs. • Retaining historic planting beds and landscape features is encouraged. • Protect historically significant vegetation during construction to avoid damage. Removal of damaged, aged, or diseased trees must be approved by the Parks Department. • If a significant tree must be removed, replace it with the same or similar species in coordination with the Parks Department. • The removal of non-historic planting schemes is encouraged. • Consider restoring the original landscape if information is available, including original plant materials. 31 Exhibit A Minor Development Historic Preservation Design Guidelines Staff Findings Page 3 of 9 1.12 Provide an appropriate context for historic structures. See diagram. • Simplicity and restraint are required. Do not overplant a site, or install a landscape which is overtextured or overly complex in relationship to the historic resource, particularly in Zone A. In Zone A, new planting shall be species that were used historically or species of similar attributes. • In areas immediately adjacent to the landmark, Zone A and Zone B, plants up 42” in height, sod, and low shrubs are often appropriate. • Contemporary planting, walls and other features are not appropriate in Zone A. A more contemporary landscape may surround new development or be located in the rear of the property, in Zone C. • Do not cover areas which were historically unpaved with hard surfaces, except for a limited patio where appropriate. • Where residential structures are being adapted to commercial use, proposals to alter the landscape will be considered on a case-by-case basis. The residential nature of the building must be honored. • In the case of a historic landmark lot split, careful consideration should be given so as not to over plant either property, or remove all evidence of the landscape characteristics from before the property was divided. • Contemporary landscapes that highlight an AspenModern architectural style are encouraged. 1.13 Additions of plant material to the landscape that could interfere with or block views of historic structures are inappropriate. • Low plantings and ground covers are preferred. • Do not place trees, shrubs, or hedgerows in locations that will obscure, damage, or block significant architectural features or views to the building. Hedgerows are not allowed as fences. • Consider mature canopy size when planting new trees adjacent to historic resources. Planting trees too close to a landmark may result in building deteriorate or blocked views and is inappropriate. • Climbing vines can damage historic structures and are not allowed. 1.14 Minimize the visual impacts of landscape lighting. • Landscape and pathway lighting is not permitted in Zone A (refer to diagram) on Aspen Victorian properties unless an exception is approved by HPC based on safety considerations. • Landscape, driveway, and pathway lighting on AspenModern properties is addressed on a case-by-case basis. 32 Exhibit A Minor Development Historic Preservation Design Guidelines Staff Findings Page 4 of 9 • Landscape light fixtures should be carefully selected so that they are compatible with the building, yet recognizable as a product of their own time. • Driveway lighting is not permitted on Aspen Victorian properties. • Landscape uplighting is not allowed. 1.16 When possible, replicate a missing historic fence based on photographic evidence. 1.17 No fence in the front yard is often the most appropriate solution. Reserve fences for back yards and behind street facing façades, as the best way to preserve the character of a property. 1.18 When building an entirely new fence, use materials that are appropriate to the building type and style. • The new fence should use materials that were used on similar properties during the period of significance. • A wood fence is the appropriate solution in most locations. • Ornate fences, including wrought iron, may create a false history are not appropriate for Aspen Victorian landmarks unless there is evidence that a decorative fence historically existed on the site. • A modest wire fence was common locally in the early 1900s and is appropriate for Aspen Victorian properties. This fence type has many desirable characteristics including transparency, a low height, and a simple design. When this material is used, posts should be simply detailed and not oversized. 1.19 A new fence should have a transparent quality, allowing views into the yard from the street. • A fence that defines a front yard must be low in height and transparent in nature. • For a picket fence, spacing between the pickets must be a minimum of 1/2 the width of the picket. • For Post-WWII properties where a more solid type of fence may be historically appropriate, proposals will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. • Fence columns or piers should be proportional to the fence segment. 1.20 Any fence taller than 42” should be designed so that it avoids blocking public views of important features of a designated building. • A privacy fence should incorporate transparent elements to minimize the possible visual impacts. Consider staggering the fence boards on either side of the fence rail. This will give the appearance of a solid plank fence when seen head on. Also consider using lattice, or other transparent detailing on the upper portions of the fence. • A privacy fence should allow the building corners and any important architectural features that are visible from the street to continue to be viewed. • All hedgerows (trees, shrub bushes, etc.) are prohibited in Zones A and B. 33 Exhibit A Minor Development Historic Preservation Design Guidelines Staff Findings Page 5 of 9 2.1 Preserve original building materials. • Do not remove siding that is in good condition or that can be repaired in place. • Masonry features that define the overall historic character, such as walls, cornices, pediments, steps and foundations, should be preserved. • Avoid rebuilding a major portion of an exterior wall that could be repaired in place. Reconstruction may result in a building which no longer retains its historic integrity. • Original AspenModern materials may be replaced in kind if it has been determined that the weathering detracts from the original design intent or philosophy. 2.2 The finish of materials should be as it would have existed historically. • Masonry naturally has a water-protective layer to protect it from the elements. Brick or stone that was not historically painted shall not be painted. • If masonry that was not painted historically was given a coat of paint at some more recent time, consider removing it, using appropriate methods. • Wood should be painted, stained or natural, as appropriate to the style and history of the building. 2.3 Match the original material in composition, scale and finish when replacing materials on primary surfaces. • If the original material is wood clapboard for example, then the replacement material must be wood as well. It should match the original in size, and the amount of exposed lap and finish. • Replace only the amount required. If a few boards are damaged beyond repair, then only those should be replaced, not the entire wall. For AspenModern buildings, sometimes the replacement of a larger area is required to preserve the integrity of the design intent. 3.1 Preserve the functional and decorative features of a historic window. • Features important to the character of a window include its frame, sash, muntins/mullions, sills, heads, jambs, moldings, operations, and groupings of windows. • Repair frames and sashes rather than replacing them. • Preserve the original glass. If original Victorian era glass is broken, consider using restoration glass for the repair. 4.1 Preserve historically significant doors. • Maintain features important to the character of a historic doorway. These include the door, door frame, screen door, threshold, glass panes, paneling, hardware, detailing, transoms and flanking sidelights. • Do not change the position and function of original front doors and primary entrances. • If a secondary entrance must be sealed shut, any work that is done must be reversible so that the door can be used at a later time, if necessary. Also, keep the door in place, in its historic position. • Previously enclosed original doors should be reopened when possible. 34 Exhibit A Minor Development Historic Preservation Design Guidelines Staff Findings Page 6 of 9 4.7 Preserve historic hardware. • When new hardware is needed, it must be in scale with the door and appropriate to the style of the building. • On Aspen Victorian properties, conceal any modern elements such as entry key pads. 5.1 Preserve an original porch or balcony. • Replace missing posts and railings when necessary. Match the original proportions, material and spacing of balusters. • Expanding the size of a historic porch or balcony is inappropriate. 5.5 If new steps are to be added, construct them out of the same primary materials used on the original, and design them to be in scale with the porch or balcony • Steps should be located in the original location. • Step width should relate to the scale of entry doors, spacing between posts, depth of deck, etc. • Brick, red sandstone, grey concrete, or wood are appropriate materials for steps. 7.3 Minimize the visual impacts of skylights and other rooftop devices. • Skylights and solar panels are generally not allowed on a historic structure. These elements may be appropriate on an addition. 7.4 New vents should be minimized, carefully, placed and painted a dark color. • Direct vents for fireplaces are generally not permitted to be added on historic structures. • Locate vents on non-street facing facades. • Use historic chimneys as chases for new flues when possible. 7.5 Preserve original chimneys, even if they are made non-functional. • Reconstruct a missing chimney when documentation exists. 7.8 New or replacement roof materials should convey a scale, color and texture similar to the original. • If a substitute is used, such as composition shingle, the roof material should be earth tone and have a matte, non-reflective finish. • Flashing should be in scale with the roof material. • Flashing should be tin, lead coated copper, galvanized or painted metal and have a matte, non-reflective finish. • Design flashing, such as drip edges, so that architectural details are not obscured. • A metal roof is inappropriate for an Aspen Victorian primary home but may be appropriate for a secondary structure from that time period. • A metal roof material should have a matte, non-reflective finish and match the original seaming. 35 Exhibit A Minor Development Historic Preservation Design Guidelines Staff Findings Page 7 of 9 7.10 Design gutters so that their visibility on the structure is minimized to the extent possible. • Downspouts should be placed in locations that are not visible from the street if possible, or in locations that do not obscure architectural detailing on the building. • The material used for the gutters should be in character with the style of the building. 10.2 A more recent addition that is not historically significant may be removed. • For Aspen Victorian properties, HPC generally relies on the 1904 Sanborn Fire Insurance maps to determine which portions of a building are historically significant and must be preserved. • HPC may insist on the removal of non-historic construction that is considered to be detrimental to the historic resource in any case when preservation benefits or variations are being approved. 10.3 Design a new addition such that one’s ability to interpret the historic character of the primary building is maintained. • A new addition must be compatible with the historic character of the primary building. • An addition must be subordinate, deferential, modest, and secondary in comparison to the architectural character of the primary building. • An addition that imitates the primary building’s historic style is not allowed. For example, a new faux Victorian detailed addition is inappropriate on an Aspen Victorian home. • An addition that covers historically significant features is inappropriate. • Proposals on corner lots require particular attention to creating compatibility. 10.6 Design a new addition to be recognized as a product of its own time. • An addition shall be distinguishable from the historic building and still be visually compatible with historic features. • A change in setbacks of the addition from the historic building, a subtle change in material, or a modern interpretation of a historic style are all techniques that may be considered to help define a change from historic construction to new construction. • Do not reference historic styles that have no basis in Aspen. • Consider these three aspects of an addition; form, materials, and fenestration. An addition must relate strongly to the historic resource in at least two of these elements. Departing from the historic resource in one of these categories allows for creativity and a contemporary design response. • Note that on a corner lot, departing from the form of the historic resource may not be allowed. • There is a spectrum of appropriate solutions to distinguishing new from old portions of a development. Some resources of particularly high significance or integrity may not be the right instance for a contrasting addition. 12.3 Exterior light fixtures should be simple in character. • The design of a new fixture should be appropriate in form, finish, and scale with the structure. 36 Exhibit A Minor Development Historic Preservation Design Guidelines Staff Findings Page 8 of 9 • New fixtures should not reflect a different period of history than that of the affected building, or be associated with a different architectural style. • Lighting should be placed in a manner that is consistent with the period of the building, and should not provide a level of illumination that is out of character. • One light adjacent to each entry is appropriate on an Aspen Victorian residential structure. A recessed fixture, surface mounted light, pendant or sconce will be considered if suited to the building type or style. • On commercial structures and AspenModern properties, recessed lights and concealed lights are often most appropriate. 12.4 Minimize the visual impacts of utilitarian areas, such as mechanical equipment and trash storage. • Place mechanical equipment on the ground where it can be screened. • Mechanical equipment may only be mounted on a building on an alley façade. • Rooftop mechanical equipment or vents must be grouped together to minimize their visual impact. Where rooftop units are visible, it may be appropriate to provide screening with materials that are compatible with those of the building itself. Use the smallest, low profile units available for the purpose. • Window air conditioning units are not allowed. • Minimize the visual impacts of utility connections and service boxes. Group them in a discrete location. Use pedestals when possible, rather than mounting on a historic building. • Paint mechanical equipment in a neutral color to minimize their appearance by blending with their backgrounds • In general, mechanical equipment should be vented through the roof, rather than a wall, in a manner that has the least visual impact possible. • Avoid surface mounted conduit on historic structures. Staff Findings: Guidelines applicable to this level of review address Site Planning and Landscape, Building Materials, Windows, Doors, Porches, Architectural Details, Roofs, Secondary Structures, Building Additions, Accessibility and Service Areas. Staff finds that a number of guidelines, namely 1.6, 1.8, 1.20, 2.1, 7.4, 10.2, 10.3 and 10.6 are not met by the design as proposed. In order to comply, restudy of the following topics is needed: • The front walkway to the resource should be a uniform path, no more than 3’ wide and constructed of a material that is related to the era of the home, such as red sandstone or brick, or a neutral material such as grey concrete to assure that it is an appropriate width and material for the context of the building. • A review of civil drawings is needed to ensure that drywells or other necessary features are not visually intrusive adjacent to historic structures. • The privacy fence towards the front of the historic resource could be softened or reduced in height to provide privacy while still allowing some views of the sides of the resource. 37 Exhibit A Minor Development Historic Preservation Design Guidelines Staff Findings Page 9 of 9 • More information is needed as to whether siding and other materials on the exterior of the house are original to ensure their proper preservation. The chimney will require careful documentation in order to be authentically reconstructed after the house move, and an explanation of the venting of a new gas fireplace in this location is needed. • The existing addition that is proposed to be retained reflects past historic preservation policies that allowed Victorian era inspired detailing on new construction. To the extent that exterior materials are to be replaced on the addition, including the roof, staff recommends efforts to better distinguish new from old and to highlight the decorative character of the Victorian structure only. Staff is concerned with the incompatible height relationship of Window 213 to the Victorian. Staff finds the design guidelines are not yet met and continuation for restudy is needed. 38 Exhibit B Relocation Staff Findings Page 1 of 3 26.415.090.C. Standards for the relocation of designated properties. Relocation for a building, structure or object will be approved if it is determined that it meets any one of the following standards: 1. It is considered a noncontributing element of a historic district and its relocation will not affect the character of the historic district; or 2. It does not contribute to the overall character of the historic district or parcel on which it is located and its relocation will not have an adverse impact on the Historic District or property; or 3. The owner has obtained a certificate of economic hardship; or 4. The relocation activity is demonstrated to be an acceptable preservation method given the character and integrity of the building, structure or object and its move will not adversely affect the integrity of the Historic District in which it was originally located or diminish the historic, architectural or aesthetic relationships of adjacent designated properties; and Additionally, for approval to relocate all of the following criteria must be met: 1. It has been determined that the building, structure or object is capable of withstanding the physical impacts of relocation; 2. An appropriate receiving site has been identified; and 3. An acceptable plan has been submitted providing for the safe relocation, repair and preservation of the building, structure or object including the provision of the necessary financial security. Relevant design guidelines are listed below. (PLEASE NOTE THAT GUIDELINES WHICH REQUIRE STUDY FOR COMPLIANCE ARE HIGHLIGHTED): 9.1 Developing a basement by underpinning and excavating while the historic structure remains in place may help to preserve the historic fabric. • This activity will require the same level of documentation, structural assessment, and posting of financial assurances as a building relocation. 9.2 Proposals to relocate a building will be considered on a case-by-case basis. • In general, on-site relocation has less of an impact on individual landmark structures than those in a historic district. • In a district, where numerous adjacent historic structures may exist, the way that buildings were placed on the site historically, and the open yards visible from the street are characteristics that should be respected in new development. • Provide a figure ground study of the surrounding parcels to demonstrate the effects of a building relocation. • In some cases, the historic significance of the structure, the context of the site, the construction technique, and the architectural style may make on-site relocation too 39 Exhibit B Relocation Staff Findings Page 2 of 3 impactful to be appropriate. It must be demonstrated that on-site relocation is the best preservation alternative in order for approval to be granted. • If relocation would result in the need to reconstruct a substantial area of the original exterior surface of the building above grade, it is not an appropriate preservation option. 9.3 Site a relocated structure in a position similar to its historic orientation. • It must face the same direction and have a relatively similar setback. In general, a forward movement, rather than a lateral movement is preferred. HPC will consider setback variations where appropriate. • A primary structure may not be moved to the rear of the parcel to accommodate a new building in front of it. • Be aware of potential restrictions against locating buildings too close to mature trees. Consult with the City Forester early in the design process. Do not relocate a building so that it becomes obscured by trees. 9.4 Position a relocated structure at its historic elevation above grade. • Raising the finished floor of the building slightly above its original elevation is acceptable if needed to address drainage issues. A substantial change in position relative to grade is inappropriate. • Avoid making design decisions that require code related alterations which could have been avoided. In particular, consider how the relationship to grade could result in non-historic guardrails, etc. 9.5 A new foundation shall appear similar in design and materials to the historic foundation. • On modest structures, a simple foundation is appropriate. Constructing a stone foundation on a miner’s cottage where there is no evidence that one existed historically is out of character and is not allowed. • Exposed concrete or painted metal flashing are generally appropriate. • Where a stone or brick foundation existed historically, it must be replicated, ideally using stone salvaged from the original foundation as a veneer. The replacement must be similar in the cut of the stone and design of the mortar joints. • New AspenModern foundations shall be handled on a case by case basis to ensure preservation of the design intent. 9.6 Minimize the visual impact of lightwells. • The size of any lightwell that faces a street should be minimized. • Lightwells must be placed so that they are not immediately adjacent to character defining features, such as front porches. • Lightwells must be protected with a flat grate, rather than a railing or may not be visible from a street. • Lightwells that face a street must abut the building foundation and generally may not “float” in the landscape except where they are screened, or on an AspenModern site. 9.7 All relocations of designated structures shall be performed by contractors who specialize in moving historic buildings, or can document adequate experience in successfully relocating such buildings. 40 Exhibit B Relocation Staff Findings Page 3 of 3 • The specific methodology to be used in relocating the structure must be approved by the HPC. • During the relocation process, panels must be mounted on the exterior of the building to protect existing openings and historic glass. Special care shall be taken to keep from damaging door and window frames and sashes in the process of covering the openings. Significant architectural details may need to be removed and securely stored until restoration. • The structure is expected to be stored on its original site during the construction process. Proposals for temporary storage on a different parcel will be considered on a case by case basis and may require special conditions of approval. • A historic resource may not be relocated outside of the City of Aspen. Staff Findings: The applicant proposes to lift the existing structure, including the entire non- historic addition, and to suspend it directly above the basement excavation before returning it to the current siting. Staff finds that maintaining the original location of the Victorian is the best preservation method for the property. There are however a few topics that must be addressed. First, there is a large cottonwood tree at the front of the site which the applicant hopes to remove, but which the Parks Department is still evaluating. To the extent that the evaluation is not completed before action is taken on this land use application, staff will recommend that the crawl space in the vicinity of the tree may not be excavated any deeper without approval of the Parks Department, in order to avoid damage to tree roots. The full depth basement may need to be held back some distance that is yet to be determined. There is very little space between the northeast corner of the non-historic addition and the historic shed on the alley. It will not be acceptable to jeopardize that structure as the relocation or excavation process unfolds. In Exhibit C, regarding setback variations, staff has raised a number of topics regarding the proximity between the house and shed that require restudy. Finally, more information is needed about the historic foundation on the resource, what remains in place and what may have been altered in the past through work on the crawlspace, re-grading of the property, etc. Historic photographs indicate steps up onto the porch, and a stone foundation. That stone foundation is still somewhat apparent. Clarification is needed and any restoration actions that can be taken must be identified. Typically, historic stone is required to be salvaged and applied to a new foundation wall as a veneer to maintain the original design. Staff finds that a number of guidelines, namely 9.4 and 9.5, are not met by the design as proposed. In order to comply, restudy of the following topics is needed: • Protection/preservation of the shed and possible re-siting of this outbuilding. • Investigation of the historic foundation condition and relationship of the building to grade. Staff finds the design guidelines are not yet met and recommends continuation for revisions. 41 Exhibit C Setback Variation Criteria Staff Findings Page 1 of 3 26.415.110.C: Variations: Dimensional variations are allowed for projects involving designated properties to create development that is more consistent with the character of the historic property or district than what would be required by the underlying zoning's dimensional standards. 1. The HPC may grant variations of the Land Use Code for designated properties to allow: a) Development in the side, rear and front setbacks; b) Development that does not meet the minimum distance requirements between buildings; c) Up to five percent (5%) additional site coverage; d) Less public amenity than required for the on-site relocation of commercial historic properties. 2. In granting a variation, the HPC must make a finding that such a variation: a) Is similar to the pattern, features and character of the historic property or district; and/or b) Enhances or mitigates an adverse impact to the historic significance or architectural character of the historic property, an adjoining designated historic property or historic district. Relevant design guidelines are listed below. (PLEASE NOTE THAT GUIDELINES WHICH REQUIRE STUDY FOR COMPLIANCE ARE HIGHLIGHTED): 8.1 If an existing secondary structure is historically significant, then it must be preserved. • When treating a historic secondary building, respect its character-defining features. These include its materials, roof form, windows, doors, and architectural details. • If a secondary structure is not historically significant, then its preservation is optional. The determination of significance is based on documentation of the construction date of the outbuilding and/or physical inspection. A secondary structure that is related to the period of significance of the primary structure will likely require preservation. 8.2 Preserve a historic secondary building as a detached structure. • Any proposal to attach a secondary structure is reviewed on a case-by-case basis. • The position and orientation of the structure should be maintained except when HPC finds that an alternative is the best preservation option. • Some AspenModern properties incorporated garages and carports into the architecture. This pattern should be maintained. 8.5 Preserve the original building materials, or match in kind when necessary. 8.6 Preserve original door and window openings and minimize new openings. • If an original carriage door exists, and can be made to function for automobile use, this is preferred. 42 Exhibit C Setback Variation Criteria Staff Findings Page 2 of 3 8.8 Adaptation of an obsolete secondary structure to a functional use is encouraged. • The reuse of any secondary structure should be sensitive so that its character is not lost. 9.3 Site a relocated structure in a position similar to its historic orientation. • It must face the same direction and have a relatively similar setback. In general, a forward movement, rather than a lateral movement is preferred. HPC will consider setback variations where appropriate. • A primary structure may not be moved to the rear of the parcel to accommodate a new building in front of it. • Be aware of potential restrictions against locating buildings too close to mature trees. Consult with the City Forester early in the design process. Do not relocate a building so that it becomes obscured by trees. Staff Findings: The historic home and shed on this site appear to be in their original locations. The historic home meets setback requirements, but the addition does not meet the minimum setback on the west side. The project architect initially proposed to staff that the home be shifted eastward and forward. While this would have corrected the west setback, it would have the negative effect of moving the home from its original siting for no clear reason. In addition, there are on-going discussions with the Parks Department regarding the preservation or removal of a large cottonwood tree at the front of the site, making a proposal to move the house towards the south impossible to support at this time. As a result, the application HPC is reviewing was amended to maintain the full structure in its current location, even after basement excavation. To do so, a west sideyard setback variation to allow the non-historic addition and new basement to continue to sit 4.7’, rather than 5’ from the west lot line is needed. The minimum east side setback of 5’ is more than met, as is the minimum combined sideyard setback of 15’, and the front yard setback. However, another variation needed is for the rear setback. 10’ is required and 8.2’ is provided. Staff supports the requested variations as they preserve the historic building location, avoid further encroachment into the dripline of a large tree that may need to be kept in place, and allow an existing addition to be retained without unnecessary demolition of viable construction materials. 1904 Sanborn Map 43 Exhibit C Setback Variation Criteria Staff Findings Page 3 of 3 The proposed site plan is shown at right. Although the historic shed is not indicated to be relocated, it sits on the rear property line (and partially into the alley) and therefore does not meet the rear setback requirement of 5’. It also is not the minimum distance from the rear of the main house. 5’ is required and approximately 1’ appears to be provided. For purposes of acknowledging the existing conditions, staff recommends HPC consider variations for the rear yard setback and the minimum distance between buildings as discussed above, but more active preservation of the shed may be necessary. As a designated structure, the building cannot be allowed to be demolished by neglect. It is so close to the existing addition that there may be building code/fireproofing implications. It’s projection into the alley may make it subject to damage from vehicles. As mentioned in the staff memo, it counts as floor area and may be need to be addressed with a floor area bonus. Staff recommends further study and documentation of this structure and a revised proposal that ensures it is being kept in good repair. Staff finds that guidelines 8.1 and 8.2 are not met by the setback variation requests as proposed because the site plan and relocation of the main home jeopardize the shed. In order to comply, restudy of the following topics is needed: • Possible on-site relocation of the shed and request for associated setback variations. Staff finds the design guidelines are not yet met and continuation for restudy is needed. Image of shed from City files, 1991 44 CITY OF ASPEN COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT City of Aspen|130 S. Galena St.|(970) 920 5090 April 2020 LAND USE APPLICATION APPLICANT: REPRESENTIVATIVE: Description: Existing and Proposed Conditions Review: Administrative or Board Review Required Land Use Review(s): Growth Management Quota System (GMQS) required fields: Net Leasable square footage Lodge Pillows Free Market dwelling units Affordable Housing dwelling units Essential Public Facility square footage Have you included the following? FEES DUE: $ Pre-Application Conference Summary Signed Fee Agreement HOA Compliance form All items listed in checklist on PreApplication Conference Summary Name: Address: Phone#: email: Address: Phone #: email: Name: Project Name and Address: Parcel ID # (REQUIRED) 45 CITY OF ASPEN COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT City of Aspen|130 S. Galena St.|(970) 920 5090 April 2020 Agreement to Pay Application Fees An agreement between the City of Aspen (“City”) and Address of Property: Please type or print in all caps Property Owner Name: Representative Name (if different from Property Owner): Billing Name and Address - Send Bills to: Contact info for billing: e-mail: Phone: / understand that the City has adopted͕ via Ordinance Eo. 2Ϭ͕ ^eries of 2Ϭ2Ϭ͕ review fees for >and hse applications͕ and payment of these fees is a condition precedent to determininŐ application completeness. / understand that as the property owner͕ / am responsible for payinŐ all fees for this development application. &or flat fees and referral fees͗ / aŐree to pay the followinŐ fees for the services indicated. / understand that these flat fees are nonͲrefundable. $. flat fee for . $. flat fee for $. flat fee for . $. flat fee for &or deposit cases only͗ The City and / understand that because of the sinje͕ nature͕ or scope of the proposed proũect͕ it is not possible at this time to know the full edžtent or total costs involved in processinŐ the application. / understand that additional costs over and above the deposit may accrue. / understand and aŐree that it is impracticable for City staff to complete processinŐ͕ review͕ and presentation of sufficient information to enable leŐally reƋuired findinŐs to be made for proũect consideration unless invoices are paid in full. The City and / understand and aŐree that invoices sent by the City to the above listed billinŐ address and not returned to the City shall be considered by the City as beinŐ received by me. / aŐree to remit payment within ϯϬ days of presentation of an invoice by the City for such services. / have read͕ understood͕ and aŐree to the >and hse Zeview &ee Wolicy͕ includinŐ conseƋuences for nonͲpayment. / aŐree to pay the followinŐ initial deposit amounts for the specified hours of staff time. / understand that payment of a deposit does not render an application complete or compliant with approval criteria. /f actual recorded costs edžceed the initial deposit͕ / aŐree to pay additional monthly billinŐs to the City to reimburse the City for processinŐ my application at the hourly rates hereinafter stated. $ deposit for hours of Community Development Department staff time. Additional time above the deposit amount will be billed at $325.00 per hour. $ deposit for hours of Engineering Department staff time. Additional time above the deposit amount will be billed at $325.00 per hour. City of Aspen: Phillip Supino, AICP Community Development Director City Use: Fees Due: $ Received $ Case # Signature: PRINT Name: Title: 214 W BLEEKER STREET SEAN WHEELER 1558 Kirby Drive, Houston, Texas 77019 sean@teamwheeler.com 832 316 8468 n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a 1300 4 n/a n/a SEAN WHEELER & 46 214 WEST BLEEKER HOLDINGS 12C Sean .wheeler @ Kirkland .8323168468 con 214 WEST BLEEKER ST.ASPEN 81617 ✗ ☆2-6-2023 214 West Bleeker Holdings LLC Sean T.Wheeler, A-Sid >1- 47 214 WEST BLEEKER HOLDINGS LLC C/O SEAN T. WHEELER 1558 KIRBY DRIVE HOUSTON, TEXAS 77019 (832) 316-8468 January 6, 2023 Community Development Department City of Aspen 130 S. Galena Street Aspen, CO 81611 To Whom It May Concern: This letter shall serve to provide notice that we authorize Ro Rockett Design to discuss and submit an HPC Application for our property at 214 West Bleeker Street. Ro Rockett Design contact information: Authorized Individuals: Jason Ro, Zac Rockett, Hilary Lemus, Bryant Suh 1031 Manchester Blvd, Unit 6 Inglewood, CA 90301 E: jro@rorockettdesign.com T: 213-784-0014 x1 C: 646-924-9782 www.rorockettdesign.com Thank you, _______________________________ Sean T. Wheeler 214 West Bleeker Holdings LLC 1558 Kirby Drive Houston, TX 77019 (832) 316-8468 An 48 RO | ROCKETT DESIGN 1306 Bridgeway, Floor 2 / Sausalito, CA 94965 / 415.289.0830 / www.rorockettdesign.com 214 W. Bleeker Street Aspen, CO 81611 Overview 214 W Bleeker is an interior remodel of an existing single family home. The house has both historic Victorian elements and a previous non-historic addition at the exterior. No exterior building renovation in scope, with the exception of addition or replacement of doors and windows at the non-historic portion of the house, painting exterior siding, and replacing cedar roof shingles with a similar material. The basement will be enlarged per the area calculations as shown on sheet Z-104, and the house will need to be lifted to accommodate the new foundation walls. Sketches of the house lifting plan are shown on Z-004; currently the house is outside the setback lines at the rear and will need to be repositioned to be complaint with all setbacks per the drawing on Z-004. 49 Sean T. Wheeler 1558 Kirby Drive Houston, TX 77019 +1 713 836 3427 sean.wheeler@kirkland.com KE 94012159.1 February 13, 2023 City of Aspen Historical Preservation Commission To Whom It May Concern: I understand that I will be required to post a $30,000 bond at the time of permit filing with respect to renovations at 214 West Bleeker Street, Aspen, CO. The funds will be available and provided when requested. Please call +1 832 316 8468 with any questions. Sincerely, Sean T. Wheeler S 50 Page 1 of 1 KL&A, Inc. 215 N. 12th Street, Unit E Carbondale, Colorado 81623 Telephone: (970) 927-5174 February 10, 2023 Bryant Suh Ro Rocket Design 115 Boomerang Road, Suite 5101A Aspen, CO 81611 Re: 214 Bleeker Relocation Dear Mr. Suh, It is our understanding that the existing historic house and addition at 214 Bleeker Street will need to be both lifted and relocated a couple of feet so that it is clear of the setbacks. We also understand that Bailey House Movers, which has experience lifting and moving historic house in the Aspen downtown area, has been engaged on this project. The project is currently in the design phase and KL&A is contracted to be the Engineer of Record for the remodel and relocation of 214 Bleeker. Based on preliminary conversations with Baily House Movers, our understanding of the house lifting plans is as follows. While the house is in place, the sitting beams will be installed through the house and bear on pier caps supported by micro-piles to the exterior of the house. This will make it possible to dig under the house. The General Contractor will need to attach LVL’s to all studs inside of the house approximately 36” from the top of the old floor to the bottom of the LVL’s. The siding will need to be removed up to just past the bottom of the LVL locations to get the beams into position. The current intent is to deconstruct or remove any existing brick fireplaces or chimneys during the demolition. Once the LVL’s and beams are in place, the house would be lifted and shifted to be within the current setbacks. The City of Aspen is familiar with this method and has approved it on past projects. This is an existing residence and currently the existing structure cannot be currently observed. The existing interior finishes will be removed prior to the lift and relocation, at which point KL&A will perform a site visit to observe the existing structure. Existing conditions may vary from the assumed conditions and the lift and relocation plan may need to be adjusted to accommodate unforeseen conditions. Because the structure can not be observed, KL&A cannot make a determination at this time as to the structural integrity of 214 Bleeker. However, KL&A did review photographs and scans provided by your office. Signs of distress or structural deficiency were not evident in the material provided. At this time, it is KL&A’s opinion that it would be structurally acceptable to lift and relocate the 214 Bleeker residence with the plan described above. If you have any questions or comments, please feel free to contact us. Sincerely, Rebecca Faverty, PE 51 PRE-APPLICATION CONFERENCE SUMMARY DATE: January 4, 2023 PLANNER: Amy Simon, Planning Director REPRESENTATIVE: Bryant Suh, bsuh@rorockettdesign.com PROJECT LOCATION: 214 W. Bleeker Street REQUEST: Historic Preservation – Minor Development Review, Relocation, Variations DESCRIPTION: 214 W. Bleeker Street is a 6,000 square foot landmarked lot in the R-6 zone district. The property contains a one and a half story Victorian era home with an existing attached addition and garage. A historic shed is located along the alley. The applicant proposes the following modifications to the property; temporarily lifting the entire structure or leaving it in place and underpinning to construct a larger basement (both are deemed to be “Relocation”), modification of fenestration on the non-historic addition, modification of decks, landscape, exterior lighting and roofing. Preliminary drawings provided to staff suggest that the existing development is over the allowed floor area. The project must be within the limit or could request a floor area bonus of up to 500 square feet, although the criteria for such a bonus are strict and require actions that improve the preservation of the historic resource, not just create additional living space. Setback variation requests may also be necessary as it appears that existing construction and the proposed basement may sit in the required rear yard setback. The Historic Preservation Design Guidelines and the Land Use Code Sections that are applicable to this project will be used to evaluate the proposal. This property is exempt from Residential Design Standard Review (RDS). The project is subject to Administrative Growth Management mitigation for affordable housing and the architect will want to bear in mind that an expansion, even below grade, is subject to mitigation at a rate of 0.107 full-time equivalent employees per thousand square feet of new area. Additional explanation on this topic can be provided by staff, but generally, mitigation exceeding 0.1 FTEs requires the provision of Affordable Housing Credits, which are in short supply. Mitigation below that threshold may be paid through a cash-in-lieu fee. Following HPC review, staff will inform City Council of the board’s decision, allowing them the opportunity to uphold or to “Call Up” aspects of the approval for further discussion. This is a standard practice for all projects that involve Relocation. RELEVANT LAND USE CODE SECTIONS: Section Number Section Title 26.304 Common Development Review Procedures 26.415.070.C Historic Preservation – Minor Development Review 26.415.090 Historic Preservation – Relocation 26.415.110 Historic Preservation - Benefits 26.575.020 Calculations and Measurements 26.710.040 Medium – Density Residential (R-6) Zone District 52 For your convenience – links to the Land Use Application, Design Guidelines and Land Use Code are below: Application Historic Preservation Design Guidelines Municipal Code Review by: Staff for completeness, Historic Preservation Commission (HPC) for approval. Public Hearing: Yes Referrals: Staff may seek referral comments from the Building Department, Zoning, Engineering and Parks regarding any relevant code requirements or considerations. There will be no Development Review Committee meeting or referral fees. Planning Fees: $1,300 for 4 billable hours of staff time. (Additional/ lesser hours will be billed/ refunded at a rate of $325 per hour.) Referral Agencies Fee: $0. Total Deposit: $1,300. APPLICATION CHECKLIST: Below is a list of submittal requirements for this review. Please email the entire application as one pdf to plannerofthday@gmail.com. The fee will be requested after the application is determined to be complete.  Completed Land Use Application and signed Fee Agreement  Pre-application Conference Summary (this document).  Street address and legal description of the parcel on which development is proposed to occur, consisting of a current (no older than 6 months) certificate from a title insurance company, an ownership and encumbrance report, or attorney licensed to practice in the State of Colorado, listing the names of all owners of the property, and all mortgages, judgments, liens, easements, contracts and agreements affecting the parcel, and demonstrating the owner’s right to apply for the Development Application.  Applicant’s name, address and telephone number in a letter signed by the applicant that states the name, address and telephone number of the representative authorized to act on behalf of the applicant.  HOA Compliance form (last page of this preapplication).  List of adjacent property owners within 300’ for public hearing.  An 8 1/2” by 11” vicinity map locating the parcel within the City of Aspen.  Site improvement survey showing all existing conditions including topography and vegetation, certified by a registered land surveyor, licensed in the state of Colorado.  A written description of the proposal (scope of work) and written explanation of how the proposed development complies with the review standards and design guidelines relevant to the application.  A proposed site plan showing setbacks and property boundaries.  Existing and proposed elevations clearly showing the areas of change.  An accurate representation of all building materials and finishes to be used in the development. Please include relevant cut-sheets for all materials for review. 53  Supplemental materials to provide a visual description of the context surrounding the designated historic property including photographs and other exhibits, as needed, to accurately depict location and extent of proposed work.  A written report from a licensed engineer or architect regarding the soundness of the miner’s cottage to be relocated and an explanation of the relocation plan.  Evidence of the financial ability to undertake the safe relocation, preservation and repair of the miner’s cottage through the posting of bonds or other financial measures deemed appropriate. Disclaimer: The foregoing summary is advisory in nature only and is not binding on the City. The summary is based on current zoning, which is subject to change in the future, and upon factual representations that may or may not be accurate. The summary does not create a legal or vested right. 54 55 56 57 58 ALTA Commitment For Title Insurance AUTHORIZED AGENT: PITKIN COUNTY TITLE, INC. 601 E. HOPKINS AVE. 3 RD FLOOR ASPEN, COLORADO 81611 970-925-1766-PHONE 970-925-6527-FAX 877-217-3158-TOLL FREE E-MAIL ADDRESS: TITLE MATTERS: CLOSING MATTERS: Nola Warnecke (nola@sopris.net) TJ Davis - (tjd@sopris.net) Joy Higens - (joy@sopris.net) Issued By Home Office: 875 Concourse Parkway South, Suite 200 Maitland, FL 32751 Telephone (407) 629-5842 59 ALTA Commitment Form (6-17-06) COMMITMENT FOR TITLE INSURANCE ISSUED BY WESTCOR LAND TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY Westcor Land Title Insurance Company, a California Corporation,("Company"), for a valuable consideration, hereby commits to issue its policy or policies of title insurance, as identified in Schedule A, in favor of the Proposed Insured named in Schedule A, as owner or mortgagee of the estate or interest covered hereby in the land described or referred to in Schedule A, upon payment of the premiums and charges and compliance with the Requirements; all subject to the provisions of Schedule A and B and to the Conditions of this Commitment. This Commitment shall be effective only when the identity of the Proposed Insured and the amount of the policy or policies committed for have been inserted in Schedule A hereof by the Company. All liability and obligations under this Commitment shall cease and terminate within six (6) months after the Effective Date or when the policy or policies committed for shall issue, whichever first occurs, provided that the failure to issue such policy or policies is not the fault of the Company. The Company will provide a sample of the policy form upon request. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, WESTCOR LAND TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY has caused its corporate name and seal to be hereunto affixed and these presents to be signed in facsimile under authority of its by-laws on the date shown in Schedule A. Issued By: WESTCOR LAND TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY Countersigned: Authorized Signature CO 1045 * * Pitkin County Title, Inc. 601 E. Hopkins #3 Aspen, CO 81611 60 CONDITIONS AND STIPULATIONS 1. The term "mortgage", when used herein, shall include deed of trust, trust deed or other security instrument. 2. If the Proposed Insured has or acquires actual knowledge of any defect, lien, encumbrance, adverse claim or other matter affecting the estate or interest or mortgage thereon covered by this Commitment other than those shown in Schedule B hereof, and shall fail to disclose such knowledge to the Company in writing, the Company shall be relieved from liability for any loss or damage resulting from any act of reliance hereon to the extent the Company is prejudiced by failure to so disclose such knowledge. If the Proposed Insured shall disclose such knowledge to the Company, or if the Company otherwise acquires actual knowledge of any such defect, lien or encumbrance, adverse claim or other matter, the Company at its option may amend Schedule B of this Commitment accordingly, but such amendment shall not relieve the Company from liability previously incurred pursuant to paragraph 3 of these Conditions and Stipulations. 3. Liability of the Company under this Commitment shall be only to the named Proposed Insured and such parties included under the definition of Insured in the form of policy or policies committed for and only for actual loss incurred in reliance hereon in undertaking in good faith (a) to comply with the requirements hereof, or (b) to eliminate exceptions shown in Schedule B, or (c) to acquire or create the estate or interest or mortgage thereon covered by this Commitment In no event shall such liability exceed the amount stated in Schedule A for the policy or policies committed for and such liability is subject to the insuring provisions and Conditions and Stipulations and the Exclusions from Coverage of the form of policy or policies committed for in favor of the Proposed Insured which are hereby incorporated by reference and are made a part of this Commitment except as expressly modified herein. 4. This Commitment is a contract to issue one or more title insurance policies and is not an abstract of title or a report of the condition of title. Any action or actions or rights of action that the Proposed Insured may have or may bring against the Company arising out of the status of the title to the estate or interest or the status of the mortgage thereon covered by this Commitment must be based on and are subject to the provisions of this Commitment. 5. The policy to be issued contains an arbitration clause. All arbitrable matters when the Amount of Insurance is $2,000,000.00 or less shall be arbitrated at the option of either the Company or the Insured as the exclusive remedy of the parties. You may review a copy of the arbitration rules at http://www.alta.org. 61 COMMITMENT FOR TITLE INSURANCE SCHEDULE A 1. Effective Date: August 26, 2022 at 8:00 AM Case No. PCT25738W7 2. Policy or Policies to be issued: (a) ALTA Owner's Policy-(8/1/2016) Amount$ 11,500,000.00 Premium$ 8,880.00 Proposed Insured: Rate: Reissue 214 WEST BLEEKER HOLDINGS, LLC, a Colorado limited liability company (b) ALTA Loan Policy-(8/1/2016) Amount$ 9,900,000.00 Premium$ 150.00 Proposed Insured: Rate: Companion ALPINE BANK, IT'S SUCCESSORS AND/OR ASSIGNS (c) ALTA Loan Policy-(8/1/2016) Amount$ Premium$ Proposed Insured: Rate: 3. Title to the FEE SIMPLE estate or interest in the land described or referred to in this Commitment is at the effective date hereof vested in: LESLEY STEVENS as to an undivided 4.25% interest (AS TO PARCEL A) and CAPRESE, LLC, a Colorado limited liability company as to an undivided 95.75% interest (AS TO PARCEL A) and ALIENATED MAJESTY LLC, a Colorado limited liability company (AS TO PARCEL B) 4. The land referred to in this Commitment is situated in the County of PITKIN State of COLORADO and is described as follows: See Attached Exhibit "A" PITKIN COUNTY TITLE, INC. Schedule A-PG.1 601 E. HOPKINS, ASPEN, CO. 81611 This Commitment is invalid 970-925-1766 Phone/970-925-6527 Fax unless the Insuring 877-217-3158 Toll Free Provisions and Schedules A and B are attached. AUTHORIZED AGENT Countersigned: 62 EXHIBIT "A" LEGAL DESCRIPTION PARCEL A The East 10 feet of Lot N, all of Lot O and the West 20 feet of Lot P, Block 50, City and Townsite of Aspen. PARCEL B LOT 2, TURLEY SUBDIVISION, according to the recorded Plat thereof, recorded in the real estate records of Pitkin County, Colorado on May 17, 1984 in Plat Book 16 at Page 5 as Reception No. 259596. 63 SCHEDULE B - SECTION 1 REQUIREMENTS The following are the requirements to be complied with: ITEM (a) Payment to or for the account of the grantors or mortgagors of the full consideration for the estate or interest to be insured. ITEM (b) Proper instrument(s) creating the estate or interest to be insured must be executed and duly filed for record to-wit: 1. A current survey, certified to Pitkin County Title, Inc. and Westcor Land Title Insurance Company by a Registered Colorado Land Surveyor must be delivered to, approved and retained by the Company. (PARCEL A) 2. INTENTIONALLY DELETED 3. Affidavit from current owners of Lot M and the West 20 feet of Lot N, Block 50, City of Aspen, stating they are not related to the Kistlers. 4. Proof of satisfaction of ADU restriction. 5. Release by the Public Trustee of the, Deed of Trust from : CAPRESE, LLC, A COLORADO LIMITED LIABILITY COMPANY to the Public Trustee of the County of PITKIN for the use of : ALPINE BANK, A COLORADO BANKING CORPORATION original amount : $9,998,750.00 dated : DECEMBER 23, 2021 recorded : DECEMBER 29, 2021 reception no. : 684014 6. Copy of the Registration duly stamped by the Secretary of State of the State of COLORADO evidencing registration of CAPRESE, LLC and Statement of Authority and a copy of the Operating Agreement of CAPRESE, LLC evidencing the names and addresses of the Members and/or Managers authorized to act on behalf of said Limited Liability Company. A Statement of Authority was recorded for CAPRESE, LLC, A COLORADO LIMITED LIABILITY COMPANY on DECEMBER 29, 2021 as Reception No. 684012, evidencing that LESLEY S. HILL, MANAGER is the authorized person to bind the transaction contemplated herein. 7. INTENTIONALLY DELETED. 8. Duly executed and acknowledged Deed, From : LESLEY STEVENS as to an undivided 4.25% interest (AS TO PARCEL A) and CAPRESE, LLC, a Colorado limited liability company as to an undivided 95.75% interest (AS TO PARCEL A) To : 214 WEST BLEEKER HOLDINGS, LLC, a Colorado limited liability company 9. Evidence satisfactory to the Company that the Real Estate Transfer Tax as established by Ordinance No. 20 (Series of 1979) and Ordinance No. 13 (Series of 1990) has been paid or exempted. (Continued) 64 SCHEDULE B - SECTION 1 REQUIREMENTS - Continued 10. A current survey, certified to Pitkin County Title, Inc. and Westcor Land Title Insurance Company by a Registered Colorado Land Surveyor must be delivered to, approved and retained by the Company. (PARCEL B) 11. Deed of Trust from : 214 WEST BLEEKER HOLDINGS, LLC, a Colorado limited liability company to the Public Trustee of the County of PITKIN for the use of : THE LENDER TO BE INSURED HEREUNDER to secure : $9,900,000.00 (AS TO PARCEL A) 12. Deed of Trust from : ALIENATED MAJESTY LLC, a Colorado limited liability company to the Public Trustee of the County of PITKIN for the use of : THE LENDER TO BE INSURED HEREUNDER to secure : $9,900,000.00 (AS TO PARCEL B) 13. Certificate of nonforeign status executed by the transferor(s). (This instrument is not required to be recorded) 14. Copy of the Registration duly stamped by the Secretary of State of the State of COLORADO evidencing registration of 214 EAST BLEEKER HOLDINGS, LLC and Statement of Authority and a copy of the Operating Agreement of 214 EAST BLEEKER HOLDINGS, LLC evidencing the names and addresses of the Members and/or Managers authorized to act on behalf of said Limited Liability Company. A Statement of Authority was recorded for ALIENATED MAJESTY LLC, a Colorado limited liability company on October 14, 2020 as Reception No. 669457, evidencing that Sean T. Wheeler, Manager is the authorized person to bind the transaction contemplated herein. 15. Copy of the Registration duly stamped by the Secretary of State of the State of evidencing registration of and Statement of Authority and a copy of the Operating Agreement of evidencing the names and addresses of the Members and/or Managers authorized to act on behalf of said Limited Liability Company. 16. Completion of Form DR 1083 regarding the withholding of Colorado Tax on the sale by certain persons, corporations and firms selling Real Property in the State of Colorado. (This instrument is not required to be recorded) 17. Evidence satisfactory to the Company that the Declaration of Sale, Notice to County Assessor as required by H.B. 1288 has been complied with. (This instrument is not required to be recorded, but must be delivered to and retained by the Assessors Office in the County in which the property is situated) 65 SCHEDULE B SECTION 2 EXCEPTIONS The policy or policies to be issued will contain exceptions to the following unless the same are disposed of to the satisfaction of the Company: 1. Rights or claims of parties in possession not shown by the public records. 2. Easements, or claims of easements, not shown by the public records. 3. Discrepancies, conflicts in boundary lines, shortage in area, encroachments, any facts which a correct survey and inspection of the premises would disclose and which are not shown by the public records. 4. Any lien, or right to a lien, for services, labor, or material heretofore or hereafter furnished, imposed by law and not shown by the public records. 5. Defects, liens, encumbrances, adverse claims or other matters, if any, created, first appearing in the public records or attaching subsequent to the effective date hereof but prior to the date the proposed insured acquires of record for value the estate or interest or mortgage thereon covered by this Commitment. 6. Taxes due and payable; and any tax, special assessment, charge or lien imposed for water or sewer service or for any other special taxing district. 7. (THE ABOVE EXCEPTIONS 1 thru 6 AFFECT Parcels A and B) 8. Reservations and exceptions as set forth in the Deed from the City of Aspen recorded January 14, 1888 in Book 59 at Page 283 and recorded September 5, 1888 in Book 59 at Page 479 providing as follows: "That no title shall be hereby acquired to any mine of gold, silver, cinnabar or copper or to any valid mining claim or possession held under existing laws". 9. Exceptions and reservations as set forth in the Act authorizing the issuance of the Patent for the City and Townsite of Aspen recorded March 1, 1897 in Book 139 at Page 216. 10. Declaration of Covenants recorded April 30, 1976 in Book 311 at Page 394 as Reception No. 183369 and re-recorded May 7, 1976 in Book 311 at Page 664 as Reception No. 183574. THIS EXCEPTION WILL BE DELETED FROM THE POLICY WHEN REQUIREMENT #3 IS SATISFIED. 11. Terms, conditions, provisions, obligations and all matters as set forth in Ordinance No. 11, Series of 1991 by Historic Preservation Committee recorded July 1, 1991 in Book 650 at Page 281 as Reception No. 334165. 12. Terms, conditions, provisions and obligations as set forth in Accessory Dwelling Unit Deed Restriction recorded April 16, 1999 as Reception No. 429962. THIS EXCEPTION WILL BE DELETED FROM THE POLICY WHEN REQUIREMENT #4 IS SATISFIED. 13. Encroachments and all matters as disclosed by Survey of Aspen Survey dated October 2021 and revised May 2022 as Job No. 2110191. 14. Terms, conditions and obligations as set forth in Residential Lease between Alienated Majesty, LLC, a Colorado limited liability company (Tenant) and Lesley Hill and Caprese LLC, a Colorado limited liability company (collectively, Landlord) for the term of June 17, 2022 thru August 15, 2022. 15. (THE ABOVE EXCEPTIONS 8 thru 14 AFFECT Parcel A) 16. Right of the proprietor of a vein or lode to extract or remove his ore therefrom, should the same be found to penetrate or intersect the premises hereby granted as reserved in United States Patent recorded June 8, 1888 in Book 55 at Page 2. (Continued) 66 SCHEDULE B SECTION 2 EXCEPTIONS - (Continued) 17. Easements, rights of way and all matters as disclosed on Plat of subject property recorded May 16, 1984 in Plat Book 16 at Page 5 as Reception No. 259596. 18. Terms, conditions, obligations and all matters as set forth in Statement of Exception from the Full Subdivision Process recorded May 17, 1984 in Book 466 at Page 469 as Reception No. 259597. 19. Terms, conditions, provisions, obligations and all matters as set forth in Declaration of Covenants, Restrictions and Conditions, recorded May 17, 1984 in Book 466 at Page 472 as Reception No. 259598 and recorded March 10, 1994 in Book 473 at Page 451. 20. Declaration of Restrictions Lot 2, Turley Subdivision dated March 04, 1994 and recorded March 10, 1994 in Book 744 at Page 23 as Reception No. 367719. 21. Terms, conditions, provisions, obligations and all matters as set forth in Resolution of the Aspen Historic Preservation Commission recorded June 5, 2000 as Reception No. 443895 as Resolution No. 23, Series of 2000. 22. Terms, conditions, provisions and obligations as set forth in Consent and Waiver recorded December 12, 2011 as Reception No. 584994. 23. Terms, conditions, provisions and obligations as set forth in Utility Easement Agreement recorded June 10, 2022 as Reception No. 688240. 24. Deed of Trust from : ALIENATED MAJESTY LLC, a Colorado limited liability company To the Public Trustee of the County of PITKIN For the use of : CITIBANK, N.A. Original Amount : $6,543,750.00 Dated : OCTOBER 13, 2020 Recorded : OCTOBER 15, 2020 Reception No. : 669479 25. (THE ABOVE EXCEPTIONS 16 thru 24 AFFECT Parcel B) 26. NOTE: The title commitment is subject to underwriting approval. The Company reserves the right to make changes. 67 ENDORSEMENT SCHEDULE FOR LENDERS POLICY FILE NO: PCT25738W7 BORROWER: 214 WEST BLEEKER HOLDINGS, LLC, a Colorado limited liability company The following endorsements will be issued in connection with the Policy to be issued hereunder as referenced above: Form: $ Form: $ Form: $ Form: $ Form: $ Upon compliance with the requirements set forth below, the following exceptions will be deleted from the final policy. The fee for deleting exceptions 1 thru 3 is $55.00 A satisfactory affidavit and agreement indemnifying the Company against any defects, liens, encumbrances, adverse claims, or other matters known by Seller and Buyer. The Company hereby reserves the right to make additional requirements as may be deemed necessary in the event information regarding defects, liens, encumbrances, adverse claims, or the like are discovered. The fee for deleting exception 4 is $10.00 for Residential Property and $25.00 for Commercial Property. Exception Number 5 is automatically deleted upon recordation of the documents called for on the requirement page of this commitment. Exception Number 6 will be amended to read: Taxes for the current year not yet due or payable, upon evidence satisfactory that the Taxes for the prior year(s) have been paid. NOTE: A satisfactory affidavit and agreement indemnifying the Company against unfiled mechanic's and materialmens liens, executed by the seller and any additional parties deemed necessary by the Company. The company hereby reserves the right to make additional requirements as may be deemed necessary in the event additional facts regarding development, construction or other building or work are disclosed to the company that may fall within any lien period as defined in the Statues of the State of Colorado, and may result in additional premiums and/or fees for such coverage and any additional requirements deemed necessary by the Company. The Company hereby reserves the right to deny any of the above coverage's at its sole discretion. 68 ENDORSEMENT SCHEDULE FOR OWNERS POLICY ATTACHED TO AND BECOMING A PART OF CASE NO: PCT25738W7 SELLER: LESLEY STEVENS as to an undivided 4.25% interest (AS TO PARCEL A) and CAPRESE, LLC, a Colorado limited liability company as to an undivided 95.75% interest (AS TO PARCEL A) BUYER: 214 WEST BLEEKER HOLDINGS, LLC, a Colorado limited liability company The following endorsements will be issued in connection with the Policy to be issued hereunder as referenced above: ENDORSEMENTS: For a fee of: $ For a fee of: $ For a fee of: $ For a fee of: $ For a fee of: $ Upon compliance with the requirements set forth below, the following exceptions will be deleted from the final policy. The fee for deleting exceptions 1 thru 3 is $55.00 A satisfactory affidavit and agreement indemnifying the Company against any defects, liens, encumbrances, adverse claims, or other matters known by Seller and Buyer. The Company hereby reserves the right to make additional requirements as may be deemed necessary in the event information regarding defects, liens, encumbrances, adverse claims, or the like are discovered. The fee for deleting exception 4 is $10.00 for Residential Property and $25.00 for Commercial Property. Exception Number 5 is automatically deleted upon recordation of the documents called for on the requirement page of this commitment. Exception Number 6 will be amended to read: Taxes for the current year not yet due or payable, upon evidence satisfactory that the Taxes for the prior year(s) have been paid. NOTE: A satisfactory affidavit and agreement indemnifying the Company against unfiled mechanic's and materialmens liens, executed by the seller and any additional parties deemed necessary by the Company. The company hereby reserves the right to make additional requirements as may be deemed necessary in the event additional facts regarding development, construction or other building or work are disclosed to the company that may fall within any lien period as defined in the Statues of the State of Colorado, and may result in additional premiums and/or fees for such coverage and any additional requirements deemed necessary by the Company. The Company hereby reserves the right to deny any of the above coverage's at its sole discretion. 69 PITKIN COUNTY TITLE, INC. Disclosures Water rights, claims or title to water. (NOTE: THIS EXCEPTION WILL APPEAR ON THE OWNER'S AND MORTGAGE POLICY TO BE ISSUED HEREUNDER) All documents received for recording or filing in the Clerk and Recorder's office shall contain a top margin of at least one inch and a left, right and bottom margin of at least one half of an inch. The Clerk and Recorder will refuse to record or file any document that does not conform to the requirements of this section. Pursuant to C.R.S. 30-10-406(3)(a). The company will not issue its policy or policies of title insurance contemplated by this commitment until it has been provided a Certificate of Taxes due or other equivalent documentation from the County Treasurer or the County Treasurer's authorized agent: or until the Proposed Insured has notified or instructed the company in writing to the contrary. Pursuant to C.R.S. 10-11-122. No person or entity that provides closing and settlement services for a real estate transaction shall disburse funds as a part of such services until those funds have been received and are available for immediate withdrawals as a matter of right. Pursuant to C.R.S. 38-35-125(2). The Company hereby notifies the proposed buyer in the current transaction that there may be recorded evidence that the mineral estate, or portion thereof, has been severed, leased, or otherwise conveyed from the surface estate. If so, there is a substantial likelihood that a third party holds some or all interest in the oil, gas, other minerals, or geothermal energy in the subject property. Such mineral estate may include the right to enter and use the property without the surface owner's permission. Pursuant to C.R.S. 10-11-123. If this transaction includes a sale of property and the sales price exceeds $100,000.00, the seller must comply with the disclosure/withholding requirements of said section. (Nonresident withholding) Pursuant to C.R.S. 39-22-604.5. Notice is hereby given that: The subject property may be located in a special taxing district. A Certificate of Taxes due listing each taxing jurisdiction shall be obtained from the County Treasurer or the County Treasurer's authorized agent. Information regarding special districts and the boundaries of such districts may be obtained from the Board of County Commissioners, the County Clerk and Recorder, or the County Assessor. Pursuant to C.R.S. 10-11-122. Notice is hereby given that: Pursuant to Colorado Division of Insurance Regulation 8-1-2; "Gap Protection" -When this Company conducts the closing and is responsible for recording or filing the legal documents resulting from the transaction, the Company shall be responsible for all matters which appear on the record prior to such time or recording or filing; and "Mechanic's Lien Protection" - If you are the buyer of a single family residence, you may request mechanic's lien coverage to be issued on your policy of Insurance. If the property being purchased has not been the subject of construction, improvements or repairs in the last six months prior to the date of this commitment, the requirements will be payment of the appropriate premium and the completion of an Affidavit and Indemnity by the seller. If the property being purchased was constructed, improved or repaired within six months prior to the date of this commitment the requirements may involve disclosure of certain financial information, payment of premiums, and indemnity, among others. The general requirements stated above are subject to revision and approval by the Company. Pursuant to C.R.S. 10-11-122. Notice is hereby given that an ALTA Closing Protection Letter is available, upon request, to certain parties to the transaction as noted in the title commitment. Pursuant to Colorado Division of Insurance Regulation 8-1-3. Nothing herein contained will be deemed to obligate the Company to provide any of the coverages referred to herein unless the above conditions are fully satisfied NOTE: The policy(s) of insurance may contain a clause permitting arbitration of claims at the request of either the Insured or the Company. Upon request, the Company will provide a copy of this clause and the accompanying arbitration rules prior to the closing of the transaction. NOTICE REGARDING CONSTRUCTION FINANCING: If it is not disclosed to the company that the loan to be insured hereunder is in fact a construction loan, any coverage given under the final policy regarding mechanic or materialmen's liens shall be deemed void and of no effect. 70 Pitkin County Title, Inc. Privacy Policy We collect nonpublic information about you from the following sources: • Information we receive from you, such as your name, address, telephone number, or social security number; • Information about your transactions with us, our affiliates, or others. We receive this information from your lender, attorney, real estate broker, etc.; and Information from public records We do not disclose any nonpublic personal information about our customers or former customers to anyone, except as permitted by law. We restrict access to nonpublic personal information about you to those employees who need to know that information to provide the products or services requested by you or your lender. We maintain physical, electronic, and procedural safeguards that company with appropriate federal and state regulations. 71 Notice of Privacy Policy of Westcor Land Title Insurance Company Westcor Land Title Insurance Company ("WLTIC") values its customers and is committed to protecting the privacy of personal information. In keeping with that philosophy, we have developed a Privacy Policy, set out below, that will ensure the continued protection of your nonpublic personal information and inform you about the measures WLTIC takes to safeguard that information. Who is Covered We provide our Privacy Policy to each customer when they purchase an WLTIC title insurance policy. Generally, this means that the Privacy Policy is provided to the customer at the closing of the real estate transaction. Information Collected In the normal course of business and to provide the necessary services to our customers, we may obtain nonpublic personal information directly from the customer, from customer-related transactions, or from third parties such as our title insurance agents, lenders, appraisers, surveyors or other similar entities. Access to Information Access to all nonpublic personal information is limited to those employees who have a need to know in order to perform their jobs. These employees include, but are not limited to, those in departments such as legal, underwriting, claims administration and accounting. Information Sharing Generally, WLTIC does not share nonpublic personal information that it collects with anyone other than its policy issuing agents as needed to complete the real estate settlement services and issue its title insurance policy as requested by the consumer. WLTIC may share nonpublic personal information as permitted by law with entities with whom WLTIC has a joint marketing agreement. Entities with whom WLTIC has a joint marketing agreement have agreed to protect the privacy of our customer's nonpublic personal information by utilizing similar precautions and security measures as WLTIC uses to protect this information and to use the information for lawful purposes. WLTIC, however, may share information as required by law in response to a subpoena, to a government regulatory agency or to prevent fraud. Information Security WLTIC, at all times, strives to maintain the confidentiality and integrity of the personal information in its possession and has instituted measures to guard against its unauthorized access. We maintain physical, electronic and procedural safeguards in compliance with federal standards to protect that information. The WLTIC Privacy Policy can also be found on WLTIC's website at www.wltic.com. 72 73 PITKIN COUNTY TITLE, INC. 601 E. HOPKINS, THIRD FLOOR ASPEN, CO 81611 970-925-1766/970-925-6527 FAX TOLL FREE 877-217-3158 WIRING INSTRUCTIONS FOR ALL TRANSACTIONS REGARDING THE CLOSING OF THIS FILE ARE AS FOLLOWS: ALPINE BANK-ASPEN 600 E. HOPKINS AVE. ASPEN, CO. 81611 ABA ROUTING NO. 102103407 FOR CREDIT TO: PITKIN COUNTY TITLE, INC., ESCROW ACCOUNT ACCOUNT NO. 8910 354 425 REFERENCE:PCT25738W7/214 WEST BLEEKER HOLDINGS, LLC, a Colorado limited liability company 74 ©2023, RO | ROCKETT DESIGN, INC. DRAWING NUMBER: DRAWING TITLE: PROJECT: NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION OWNER: PROJECT ARCHITECT: RO | ROCKETT DESIGN 1031 W. MANCHESTER BLVD. UNIT 6 INGLEWOOD, CA 90301 TEL: 646.924.9782 CIVIL ENGINEER: ALIENATED MAJESTY, LLC 3111 RICE BOULEVARD HOUSTON, TX 77005 CONTRACTOR: TBD STRUCTURAL ENGINEER: MECHANICAL ENGINEER: PROJECT NUMBER SEAL: All designs, ideas, arrangements and plans indicated by these drawings are the property and copyright of the Architect and shall neither be used on any other work nor be disclosed to any other person for any use whatsoever without written permission. RO|ROCKETT DESIGN and/or its principals and employees waives any and all liability or responsibility for problems that may occur when these plans, drawings, specifications, and/or designs are followed without the designer's guidance with ambiguities, or conflicts which are alleged. KL&A, INC 1717 WASHINGTON AVE GOLDEN, CO 80401 TEL: 303.384.9910 AEC 40801 US HWY 8 AND 24, SUITE 214 EAGLE-VAIL, CO 81620 TEL: 970.748.8520 SGM 118 W SIXTH ST, SUITE 200 GLENWOOD SPRINGS, CO 81601 TEL: 970.384.9081 N3/28/2023 5:54:14 PMG-000.1 COVER SHEET - HPC 214 W BLEEKER 214 W BLEEKER 214 W BLEEKER STREET ASPEN, CO 81611 APN: 2205 HPC REVIEW -NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION APRIL 12, 2023 214 W. BLEEKER STREET NOTE THE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR ALL DRAWINGS, CALCULATIONS, GOVERNMENTAL AGENCY APPROVALS AND FEES TO COMPLETE THIS WORK. CONTRACTOR/SUBCONTRACTORS SHALL SUBMIT MECHANICAL, ELECTRICAL, COMMUNICATIONS AND PLUMBING DRAWINGS TO RO ROCKETT DESIGN FOR PREVIEW OF DEVICE TYPES, LOCATIONS AND QUANTITIES, HVAC ZONING/THERMOSTAT LOCATIONS, ETC. PRIOR TO SUBMITTING FOR PERMIT AND CONSTRUCTION. PROJECT ZONING/PARCEL MAP: PROJECT IMAGE PROJECT LOCATION 214 W. BLEEKER ST W BLEEKER STREET W HALLAM STREET W MAIN STREETN 2ND STN 1ST STN GARMISCH STDESCRIPTION EXTERIOR RESTORATION OF AN EXISTING HISTORIC VICTORIAN STRUCTURE. PROJECT TO INCLUDE RELOCATION OF STRUCTURE & INTERIOR RENOVATION. ADDITIONAL SQUARE FOOTAGE ADDED SUBGRADE AT BASEMENT. PROJECT ADDRESS 214 W BLEEKER ST ASPEN, CO 81611 PARCEL INFORMATION PARCEL: 273512435005 BLOCK: CURRENT CODE 2018 INTERNATIONAL RESIDENTIAL CODE W/ ANY APPLICABLE AMENDMENTS PUT FORTH BY THE CITY OF ASPEN MUNICIPAL CODE OF ORDINANCES PROJECT DATA LOT SIZE:6,000 SF ZONING DESIGNATION:R-6 OCCUPANCY:SINGLE FAMILY CONSTRUCTION TYPE:INTERIOR RENOVATION SIDEYARD SETBACK:WEST, 10' MIN EAST, 5' 15' COMBINED PARKING: COVERED: 2 CAR GARAGE FIRE HAZARD SAFETY ZONE HIGH NOTE THE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR ALL DRAWINGS, CALCULATIONS, GOVERNMENTAL AGENCY APPROVALS AND FEES TO COMPLETE THIS WORK. CONTRACTOR/SUBCONTRACTORS SHALL SUBMIT MECHANICAL, ELECTRICAL, COMMUNICATIONS AND PLUMBING DRAWINGS TO RO ROCKETT DESIGN FOR PREVIEW OF DEVICE TYPES, LOCATIONS AND QUANTITIES, HVAC ZONING/THERMOSTAT LOCATIONS, ETC. PRIOR TO SUBMITTING FOR PERMIT AND CONSTRUCTION. PROJECT LOCATION: PROJECT IMAGE PROJECT LOCATION 214 W. BLEEKER ST W BLEEKER STREET W HALLAM STREET W MAIN STREETN 2ND STN 1ST STN GARMISCH STNO DATE ISSUE 0 03/22/2023 HPC DRAFT 75 ©2023, RO | ROCKETT DESIGN, INC. DRAWING NUMBER: DRAWING TITLE: PROJECT: NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION OWNER: PROJECT ARCHITECT: RO | ROCKETT DESIGN 1031 W. MANCHESTER BLVD. UNIT 6 INGLEWOOD, CA 90301 TEL: 646.924.9782 CIVIL ENGINEER: ALIENATED MAJESTY, LLC 3111 RICE BOULEVARD HOUSTON, TX 77005 CONTRACTOR: TBD STRUCTURAL ENGINEER: MECHANICAL ENGINEER: PROJECT NUMBER SEAL: All designs, ideas, arrangements and plans indicated by these drawings are the property and copyright of the Architect and shall neither be used on any other work nor be disclosed to any other person for any use whatsoever without written permission. RO|ROCKETT DESIGN and/or its principals and employees waives any and all liability or responsibility for problems that may occur when these plans, drawings, specifications, and/or designs are followed without the designer's guidance with ambiguities, or conflicts which are alleged. KL&A, INC 1717 WASHINGTON AVE GOLDEN, CO 80401 TEL: 303.384.9910 AEC 40801 US HWY 8 AND 24, SUITE 214 EAGLE-VAIL, CO 81620 TEL: 970.748.8520 SGM 118 W SIXTH ST, SUITE 200 GLENWOOD SPRINGS, CO 81601 TEL: 970.384.9081 N3/28/2023 5:54:14 PMG-001 SHEET INDEX 214 W BLEEKER 214 W BLEEKER 214 W BLEEKER STREET ASPEN, CO 81611 APN: 2205 ISSUED REVISED/ REISSUED OMITTED LEGEND SHEET INDEX HPC HPC SUBMISSION - 04.12.20231-GENERAL G-000.1 COVER SHEET - HPC ● G-001 SHEET INDEX ● G-004 ABBREVIATIONS & SYMBOLS ● Z-001 STREET CONTEXT ● Z-002 HISTORIC PHOTOS AND MAPS ● Z-003 HISTORIC PHOTOGRAPHS ● Z-004 HOUSE MOVING PLAN ● Z-005 EXISTING ELEVATIONS ● Z-006 WALL DEMOLITION CALCULATIONS ● Z-007 ROOF DEMOLITION CALCULATIONS ● Z-101 RESIDENTIAL DESIGN STANDARDS COMPLIANCE ● Z-102 HPC GUIDELINES ● Z-103 EXISTING FLOOR AREA CALCULATIONS ● Z-104 PROPOSED AREA CALCULATIONS ● Z-200 BUILDING MATERIALS ● Z-900 SURVEY ● 5-ARCHITECTURAL A-010 FLOOR PLAN / BASEMENT / DEMO ● A-011 DEMOLITION PLAN / LEVEL 1 ● A-012 DEMOLITION PLAN / LEVEL 2 ● A-013 DEMOLITION PLAN / ROOF ● A-100 SITE PLAN ● A-101 FLOOR PLAN / BASEMENT ● A-102 FLOOR PLAN / LEVEL 1 ● A-103 FLOOR PLAN / LEVEL 2 ● A-104 FLOOR PLAN / ROOF ● A-300 EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS ● A-301 EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS ● A-400 BUILDING SECTIONS ● 9-LIGHTING EL-1.0 EXTERIOR ARCH LIGHTING CUTSHEETS ● NO DATE ISSUE 0 03/22/2023 HPC DRAFT 76 ©2023, RO | ROCKETT DESIGN, INC. DRAWING NUMBER: DRAWING TITLE: PROJECT: NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION OWNER: PROJECT ARCHITECT: RO | ROCKETT DESIGN 1031 W. MANCHESTER BLVD. UNIT 6 INGLEWOOD, CA 90301 TEL: 646.924.9782 CIVIL ENGINEER: ALIENATED MAJESTY, LLC 3111 RICE BOULEVARD HOUSTON, TX 77005 CONTRACTOR: TBD STRUCTURAL ENGINEER: MECHANICAL ENGINEER: PROJECT NUMBER SEAL: All designs, ideas, arrangements and plans indicated by these drawings are the property and copyright of the Architect and shall neither be used on any other work nor be disclosed to any other person for any use whatsoever without written permission. RO|ROCKETT DESIGN and/or its principals and employees waives any and all liability or responsibility for problems that may occur when these plans, drawings, specifications, and/or designs are followed without the designer's guidance with ambiguities, or conflicts which are alleged. KL&A, INC 1717 WASHINGTON AVE GOLDEN, CO 80401 TEL: 303.384.9910 AEC 40801 US HWY 8 AND 24, SUITE 214 EAGLE-VAIL, CO 81620 TEL: 970.748.8520 SGM 118 W SIXTH ST, SUITE 200 GLENWOOD SPRINGS, CO 81601 TEL: 970.384.9081 N3/28/2023 5:54:16 PMZ-003 HISTORIC PHOTOGRAPHS 214 W BLEEKER 214 W BLEEKER 214 W BLEEKER STREET ASPEN, CO 81611 APN: 2205 HISTORIC SOUTH FACADE WITH TREES NO LONGER ON SITE - circa 1910SOUTH FACADE WITH LARGE EXISTING TREE - circa 1972 SOUTH FACADE - circa 1970 NO DATE ISSUE 0 03/22/2023 HPC DRAFT 79 ©2023, RO | ROCKETT DESIGN, INC. DRAWING NUMBER: DRAWING TITLE: PROJECT: NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION OWNER: PROJECT ARCHITECT: RO | ROCKETT DESIGN 1031 W. MANCHESTER BLVD. UNIT 6 INGLEWOOD, CA 90301 TEL: 646.924.9782 CIVIL ENGINEER: ALIENATED MAJESTY, LLC 3111 RICE BOULEVARD HOUSTON, TX 77005 CONTRACTOR: TBD STRUCTURAL ENGINEER: MECHANICAL ENGINEER: PROJECT NUMBER SEAL: All designs, ideas, arrangements and plans indicated by these drawings are the property and copyright of the Architect and shall neither be used on any other work nor be disclosed to any other person for any use whatsoever without written permission. RO|ROCKETT DESIGN and/or its principals and employees waives any and all liability or responsibility for problems that may occur when these plans, drawings, specifications, and/or designs are followed without the designer's guidance with ambiguities, or conflicts which are alleged. KL&A, INC 1717 WASHINGTON AVE GOLDEN, CO 80401 TEL: 303.384.9910 AEC 40801 US HWY 8 AND 24, SUITE 214 EAGLE-VAIL, CO 81620 TEL: 970.748.8520 SGM 118 W SIXTH ST, SUITE 200 GLENWOOD SPRINGS, CO 81601 TEL: 970.384.9081 N3/28/2023 5:54:16 PMZ-004 HOUSE MOVING PLAN 214 W BLEEKER 214 W BLEEKER 214 W BLEEKER STREET ASPEN, CO 81611 APN: 2205 HOUSE MOVING PLAN STRUCTURE / LEVEL 13 SCALE: NTS HOUSE MOVING PLAN STRUCTURE / LEVEL 02 SCALE: NTS NO DATE ISSUE 0 03/22/2023 HPC DRAFT NOTE: HOUSE TO BE LIFTED AND PLACED IN SAME ORIENTATION AND ORIGIN 80 (E)BASEMENT -8' -7" (E) LEVEL 1 FF 0' -0" (E) LEVEL 2 10' -7" (E) ROOF 26' -7" C D E F G HBA (E) BASEMENT FOOTPRINT (E) HISTORIC SHED. STABILIZED AS REQ'D AND PROTECTED DURING CONSTRUCTION 20'-10 1/2"6'-4 5/8"15'-9 1/2"3'-10 1/2" HISTORIC 29'-0 1/2" 105 (E)106 (E)105 (E)112 (E)111 (E)109 106 (E)110 (E)208(E)209(E)212 (EH)101 A B C (E) WOOD SHINGLE ROOF (E) PAINTED WOOD SIDING HISTORIC ASSETNON-HISTORICHISTORIC ASSETNON-HISTORICASSUMED HISTORIC WINDOW (E)218 216 (E)219 (E)217 (E)BASEMENT -8' -7" (E) LEVEL 1 FF 0' -0" (E) LEVEL 2 10' -7" (E) ROOF 26' -7" 123456 (E) HISTORIC SHED, DASHED FOR CLARITY. STABILIZED AS REQ'D AND PROTECTED DURING CONSTRUCTION (E) WOOD SHINGLE ROOF (E) GUTTER / DOWNSPOUT FOOTPRINT OF (E) BASEMENT 6'-2 1/4"6'-7 3/4"11'-0 1/8"10'-11 3/8"3'-5" (E) EGRESS WELL AND WINDOW WOOD GUARDRAIL AND DECK (E)103(E)104 (E)107 (E)207 (E)206 (E)001 (E)108 A A (E) PAINTED WOOD SIDING (E) SECTIONAL GARAGE DOORS (E)BASEMENT -8' -7" (E) LEVEL 1 FF 0' -0" (E) LEVEL 2 10' -7" (E) ROOF 26' -7" 1 2 3 4 5 6 3'-5"10'-11 3/8"11'-0 1/8"6'-7 3/4"6'-2 1/4"26'-7"FOOTPRINT OF (E) BASEMENT (E)102 (EH)102 100 (E)100 (E)202 (E)200 (E) HISTORIC FRONT PORCH TO REMAIN A B ASSUMED HISTORIC WINDOW TO REMAIN (E) BRICK CHIMNEY TO BE REINSTALLED AFTER HISTORIC ASSET IS REINSTALLED (E) WOOD SHINGLE ROOF (E)BASEMENT -8' -7" (E) LEVEL 1 FF 0' -0" (E) LEVEL 2 10' -7" (E) ROOF 26' -7" CDEFGH B A (E) BASEMENT FOOTPRINT HISTORIC 29' - 0 1/2"20'-10 1/2"6'-4 5/8"15'-9 1/2"3'-10 1/2" (E) HISTORIC SHED. STABILIZED AS REQ'D AND PROTECTED DURING CONSTRUCTION (E)103 (E)104 (E)101 (E)205 (E)204 (E)203A (E)203B (E)201 (E)167 (E) BRICK CHIMNEY TO BE REINSTALLED AFTER HISTORIC ASSET IS REINSTALLED (E) NON- HISTORIC SHED TO REMAIN (E) WATER HEATER SHED D A C HISTORIC ASSETNON-HISTORICHISTORIC ASSETNON-HISTORIC(E) WOOD SHINGLE ROOF (E) PAINTED WOOD SIDING A BUILDING ELEMENTS TO BE DEMOLISHED NON-HISTORIC ADDITION WINDOW TO BE REMOVED NON-HISTORIC ADDITION DOOR TO BE REMOVED NON-HISTORIC ADDITION SKYLIGHT TO BE REMOVED NON-HISTORIC ADDITION SHED TO BE REMOVED A B C D (EH) ASSUMED EXISTING HISTORIC WINDOW ©2023, RO | ROCKETT DESIGN, INC. DRAWING NUMBER: DRAWING TITLE: PROJECT: NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION OWNER: PROJECT ARCHITECT: RO | ROCKETT DESIGN 1031 W. MANCHESTER BLVD. UNIT 6 INGLEWOOD, CA 90301 TEL: 646.924.9782 CIVIL ENGINEER: ALIENATED MAJESTY, LLC 3111 RICE BOULEVARD HOUSTON, TX 77005 CONTRACTOR: TBD STRUCTURAL ENGINEER: MECHANICAL ENGINEER: PROJECT NUMBER SEAL: All designs, ideas, arrangements and plans indicated by these drawings are the property and copyright of the Architect and shall neither be used on any other work nor be disclosed to any other person for any use whatsoever without written permission. RO|ROCKETT DESIGN and/or its principals and employees waives any and all liability or responsibility for problems that may occur when these plans, drawings, specifications, and/or designs are followed without the designer's guidance with ambiguities, or conflicts which are alleged. KL&A, INC 1717 WASHINGTON AVE GOLDEN, CO 80401 TEL: 303.384.9910 AEC 40801 US HWY 8 AND 24, SUITE 214 EAGLE-VAIL, CO 81620 TEL: 970.748.8520 SGM 118 W SIXTH ST, SUITE 200 GLENWOOD SPRINGS, CO 81601 TEL: 970.384.9081 N3/28/2023 5:54:33 PMZ-005 EXISTING ELEVATIONS 214 W BLEEKER 214 W BLEEKER 214 W BLEEKER STREET ASPEN, CO 81611 APN: 2205 3/16" = 1'-0"1 CD-00-300-EAST (E)3/16" = 1'-0"2 CD-00-300-NORTH (E) 3/16" = 1'-0"3 CD-00-300-SOUTH (E)3/16" = 1'-0"4 CD-00-300-WEST (E) NO DATE ISSUE 0 03/22/2023 HPC DRAFT 81 CITY OF ASPEN PARCEL NUMBER: 273512435005 WALL DEMOLITION CALCULATIONS FAÇADE WALL AREA (SF) REDUCED FOR FENESTRATION (SF) WALL AREA TO BE REMOVED (SF) SOUTH 682 137.5 22 NORTH 777 231 16 EAST 1,224.5 293.5 22 WEST 1,302 159.5 6 WALL SURFACE AREA TOTAL 3,985.5 AREA REDUCED FOR FENESTRATION 821.5 AREA USED FOR DEMOLITION CALCULATION 3,164 WALL SURFACE AREA TO BE REMOVED 66 DEMOLITION TOTALS ROOF + WALL AREA FOR DEMO CALC (3,543 + 3,164)6,707 ROOF + WALL AREA TO BE REMOVED (46 + 66)112 TOTAL 1.7% (E) DOOR TO BE REMOVED & REPLACED (E) WINDOW TO BE REMOVED & WALL FILLED IN 17.5 SF17.5 SF 9.5 SF 4 SF 9.5 SF 5 SF 49 SF 13.5 SF 13 SF 13 SF13 SF 12 SF 2 SF 12 SF 49 SF 12 SF 13 SF 12 SF 12 SF 27 SF 18 SF 57 SF 65.5 SF 244 SF 23.5 SF 72 SF 102 SF 73 SF 169 SF 400.5 SF WALL AREA TO REMAIN 1,200.5 SF FENESTRATION WALL AREA 293.5 SF WALL AREA TO BE REMOVED 24 SF HISTORIC ASSET NON-HISTORIC (E) WINDOW TO BE REMOVED & REPLACED(E) WINDOW TO BE REMOVED & REPLACED (E) WINDOW TO BE REMOVED & WALL FILLED IN 69 SF (INCLUDES FULL AREA OF WALL NOT VISIBLE ON ELEV) 72 SF 22 SF22 SF 7.5 SF 16 SF 8 SF 26.5 SF 499.5 SF 68.5 SF 8 SF 3.5 SF (+3.5 SF FOR IDENTICAL DORMER BEYOND NOT SHOWN) 3.5 SF (+3.5 SF FOR IDENTICAL DORMER BEYOND NOT SHOWN) 10 SF (+10 SF AT OPP SIDE OF DOORS) 71 SF (INCLUDES FULL AREA OF WALL NOT VISIBLE ON ELEV) 73 SF WALL AREA TO REMAIN 761 SF FENESTRATION WALL AREA 231 SF WALL AREA TO BE REMOVED 16 SF 27 SF (WALL SEGMENT BEYOND) 13 SF 13 SF 32 SF 24 SF 4 SF 1.5 SF 50 SF93 SF 23.5 SF 191 SF 90.5 SF (E) DOOR TO BE REMOVED & WALL FILLED IN (E) WINDOW TO BE REMOVED & REPLACED 234 SF (INCLUDES FULL AREA OF WALL NOT VISIBLE ON ELEV) 21.5 SF WALL AREA TO REMAIN 670 SF FENESTRATION WALL AREA 137.5 SF WALL AREA TO BE REMOVED 21.5 SF 41 SF 9 SF (E) WINDOWS TO BE REMOVED & WALL FILLED IN 17.5 SF 17.5 SF 12 SF 12 SF 12.5 SF 13.5 SF 37.5 SF 5.5 SF 5.5 SF 13 SF 13 SF 377 SF 18 SF 78.5 SF 347.5 SF 481 SF WALL AREA TO REMAIN 1,302 SF FENESTRATION WALL AREA 159.5 SF WALL AREA TO BE REMOVED 6 SF EXISTING WALL TO REMAIN WALL TO BE DEMOLISHED - NEW WINDOW / DOOR PROPOSED REDUCED FOR FENESTRATION EXISTING WINDOW / DOOR NON-HISTORIC HISTORIC ASSET (E) WINDOW TO BE REMOVED & WALL FILLED IN 6 SF (E) WINDOW TO BE REMOVED & REPLACED (E) HISTORIC SHED NOT TO BE ALTERED, NOT INCLUDED IN CALCS HISTORIC ASSETNON-HISTORIC WALL SEGMENT SHOWN DASHED ON NORTH ELEV (E) STORAGE SHED TO REMAIN, NOT INCLUDED IN CALCS (E) WATER HEATER ENCLOSURE TO BE DEMOLISHED, NOT INCLUDED IN CALCS ©2023, RO | ROCKETT DESIGN, INC. DRAWING NUMBER: DRAWING TITLE: PROJECT: NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION OWNER: PROJECT ARCHITECT: RO | ROCKETT DESIGN 1031 W. MANCHESTER BLVD. UNIT 6 INGLEWOOD, CA 90301 TEL: 646.924.9782 CIVIL ENGINEER: ALIENATED MAJESTY, LLC 3111 RICE BOULEVARD HOUSTON, TX 77005 CONTRACTOR: TBD STRUCTURAL ENGINEER: MECHANICAL ENGINEER: PROJECT NUMBER SEAL: All designs, ideas, arrangements and plans indicated by these drawings are the property and copyright of the Architect and shall neither be used on any other work nor be disclosed to any other person for any use whatsoever without written permission. RO|ROCKETT DESIGN and/or its principals and employees waives any and all liability or responsibility for problems that may occur when these plans, drawings, specifications, and/or designs are followed without the designer's guidance with ambiguities, or conflicts which are alleged. KL&A, INC 1717 WASHINGTON AVE GOLDEN, CO 80401 TEL: 303.384.9910 AEC 40801 US HWY 8 AND 24, SUITE 214 EAGLE-VAIL, CO 81620 TEL: 970.748.8520 SGM 118 W SIXTH ST, SUITE 200 GLENWOOD SPRINGS, CO 81601 TEL: 970.384.9081 N3/28/2023 5:54:34 PMZ-006 WALL DEMOLITION CALCULATIONS 214 W BLEEKER 214 W BLEEKER 214 W BLEEKER STREET ASPEN, CO 81611 APN: 2205 1/8" = 1'-0"3 EXTERIOR ELEVATION DEMOLITION AREA / EAST 1/8" = 1'-0"4 EXTERIOR ELEVATION DEMOLITION AREA / NORTH 1/8" = 1'-0"5 EXTERIOR ELEVATION DEMOLITION AREA / SOUTH 1/8" = 1'-0"2 EXTERIOR ELEVATION DEMOLITION AREA / WEST 1/8" = 1'-0"1 DEMOLITION PLAN / LEVEL 1 NO DATE ISSUE 0 03/22/2023 HPC DRAFT NOTE: NO DEMOLITION OF EXISTING HISTORIC WINDOWS OR DOORS 82 CITY OF ASPEN PARCEL NUMBER: 273512435005 ROOF DEMOLITION CALCULATIONS ROOF AREA (SF) ROOF AREA TO BE REMOVED (SF) HISTORICAL ROOF TOTAL 1,320.5 0 EXISTING ADDITION ROOF TOTAL 2,222.5 46 TOTAL ROOF AREA 3,543 46 DEMOLITION TOTALS ROOF + WALL AREA FOR DEMO CALC (3,543 + 3,164)6,707 ROOF + WALL AREA TO BE REMOVED (46 + 66)112 TOTAL 1.7% SLSL SL SL SL SL SL SL SL SL SL SLSL SLSL SLSL SLSL SLSLSLSL SL SL SL SL SL SL SL HISTORIC SHED TO REMAIN - NOT ATTACHED TO HOUSE. SHOWN FOR REFERENCE FLAT ROOF PATIO TO REMAIN SL SL HISTORIC ASSETNON-HISTORIC (E) BRICK CHIMNEY TO BE REINSTALLED AFTER HISTORIC ASSET IS REINSTALLED 312 SF 312 SF 43 SF 43 SF 43 SF 43 SF 43 SF43 SF43 SF43 SF 315 SF 315 SF 95 SF 95 SF 134 SF 134 SF 11.5 SF 11.5 SF 186 SF346 SF 109 SF305 SF 281 SF 19 SF 3.5 SF 3.5 SF 72 SF 13 SF 54 SF 4 SF 4 SF 4 SF 3 SF 15 SF HISTORIC SHED TO REMAIN - NOT ATTACHED TO HOUSE. NOT PART OF CALCULATED AREA. ROOF OF ATTACHED STORAGE AREA. NOT PART OF CALCULATED AREA. EXISTING ROOF TO REMAIN ROOF TO BE DEMOLISHED - NEW SKYLIGHT PROPOSED REDUCED FOR FENESTRATION - EXISTING SKYLIGHT 14.5 SF 9 SF 2 SF 3 SF 56.5 SF HISTORIC ASSETNON-HISTORIC 15 SF 4 SF ©2023, RO | ROCKETT DESIGN, INC. DRAWING NUMBER: DRAWING TITLE: PROJECT: NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION OWNER: PROJECT ARCHITECT: RO | ROCKETT DESIGN 1031 W. MANCHESTER BLVD. UNIT 6 INGLEWOOD, CA 90301 TEL: 646.924.9782 CIVIL ENGINEER: ALIENATED MAJESTY, LLC 3111 RICE BOULEVARD HOUSTON, TX 77005 CONTRACTOR: TBD STRUCTURAL ENGINEER: MECHANICAL ENGINEER: PROJECT NUMBER SEAL: All designs, ideas, arrangements and plans indicated by these drawings are the property and copyright of the Architect and shall neither be used on any other work nor be disclosed to any other person for any use whatsoever without written permission. RO|ROCKETT DESIGN and/or its principals and employees waives any and all liability or responsibility for problems that may occur when these plans, drawings, specifications, and/or designs are followed without the designer's guidance with ambiguities, or conflicts which are alleged. KL&A, INC 1717 WASHINGTON AVE GOLDEN, CO 80401 TEL: 303.384.9910 AEC 40801 US HWY 8 AND 24, SUITE 214 EAGLE-VAIL, CO 81620 TEL: 970.748.8520 SGM 118 W SIXTH ST, SUITE 200 GLENWOOD SPRINGS, CO 81601 TEL: 970.384.9081 N3/28/2023 5:54:35 PMZ-007 ROOF DEMOLITION CALCULATIONS 214 W BLEEKER 214 W BLEEKER 214 W BLEEKER STREET ASPEN, CO 81611 APN: 2205 1/8" = 1'-0"1 ROOF PLAN / EXISTING 1/8" = 1'-0"2 ROOF PLAN / PROPOSED NO DATE ISSUE 0 03/22/2023 HPC DRAFT 83 ©2023, RO | ROCKETT DESIGN, INC. DRAWING NUMBER: DRAWING TITLE: PROJECT: NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION OWNER: PROJECT ARCHITECT: RO | ROCKETT DESIGN 1031 W. MANCHESTER BLVD. UNIT 6 INGLEWOOD, CA 90301 TEL: 646.924.9782 CIVIL ENGINEER: ALIENATED MAJESTY, LLC 3111 RICE BOULEVARD HOUSTON, TX 77005 CONTRACTOR: TBD STRUCTURAL ENGINEER: MECHANICAL ENGINEER: PROJECT NUMBER SEAL: All designs, ideas, arrangements and plans indicated by these drawings are the property and copyright of the Architect and shall neither be used on any other work nor be disclosed to any other person for any use whatsoever without written permission. RO|ROCKETT DESIGN and/or its principals and employees waives any and all liability or responsibility for problems that may occur when these plans, drawings, specifications, and/or designs are followed without the designer's guidance with ambiguities, or conflicts which are alleged. KL&A, INC 1717 WASHINGTON AVE GOLDEN, CO 80401 TEL: 303.384.9910 AEC 40801 US HWY 8 AND 24, SUITE 214 EAGLE-VAIL, CO 81620 TEL: 970.748.8520 SGM 118 W SIXTH ST, SUITE 200 GLENWOOD SPRINGS, CO 81601 TEL: 970.384.9081 N3/28/2023 5:54:36 PMZ-102 HPC GUIDELINES 214 W BLEEKER 214 W BLEEKER 214 W BLEEKER STREET ASPEN, CO 81611 APN: 2205 The existing property fence is non-historic and a new fence will be constructed in a manner compliant to the Residential Design Standards. Trees will be preserved if possible. Tree at front yard is diseased and hazardous and will need to be removed with a permit from the Parks Department. Existing porch is open and no proposed changes to design. No roof addition in scope No new dormer addition in scope No home relocation The existing home will be lifted to accomodate expansion of basement and its structure. The home will be replaced in its original orientation and direction. No removal of exterior mass No addition at exterior No addition at exterior No addition at exterior While no addition will be done at exterior, the roof finish will be replaced in kind. Roof slope and shape will be kept the same N/A No addition at exterior No addition at exterior No addition at exterior N/A N/A N/A Low-mainenance materials are installed on existing home N/A N/A NO DATE ISSUE 0 03/22/2023 HPC DRAFT 84 (E) EXT BASEMENT WALLS TO BE REMOVEDEXPOSED WALL AREA @ WELL = 35.9 SF BASEMENT AREA 774.5 SF 1 2 3 4 5 67 8 27' - 4 3/4"19' - 8 3/4"10' - 1"17' - 3"3' - 5"26'-4 3/4"5'-10 3/4" 6'-5" HISTORIC SHED SHED TO REMAIN, NOT PART OF AREA CALCS GARAGE FAR = 460 - 250 X 0.5 = 105.1 SF GARAGE 460 SF MAIN LEVEL AREA 1485 SF UPPER LEVEL AREA 1553 SF 27'-4 3/4"19'-8 3/4" 1 2 274 197 (E) BASEMENT (E) B.O. STRUCTURE 17'-3" 3'-5" 5 6 6'-5" 7 26'-4 3/4" 8 173 34 64 264 (E) BASEMENT (E) B.O. STRUCTURE 10'-0"4'-9"7'-6 1/2"EXPOSED WALL AREA @ WELL 35.9 SF 5'-10 3/4"10'-1" 3 4 59 100.5 (E) BASEMENT (E) B.O. STRUCTURE 10'-0"10'-0"©2023, RO | ROCKETT DESIGN, INC. DRAWING NUMBER: DRAWING TITLE: PROJECT: NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION OWNER: PROJECT ARCHITECT: RO | ROCKETT DESIGN 1031 W. MANCHESTER BLVD. UNIT 6 INGLEWOOD, CA 90301 TEL: 646.924.9782 CIVIL ENGINEER: ALIENATED MAJESTY, LLC 3111 RICE BOULEVARD HOUSTON, TX 77005 CONTRACTOR: TBD STRUCTURAL ENGINEER: MECHANICAL ENGINEER: PROJECT NUMBER SEAL: All designs, ideas, arrangements and plans indicated by these drawings are the property and copyright of the Architect and shall neither be used on any other work nor be disclosed to any other person for any use whatsoever without written permission. RO|ROCKETT DESIGN and/or its principals and employees waives any and all liability or responsibility for problems that may occur when these plans, drawings, specifications, and/or designs are followed without the designer's guidance with ambiguities, or conflicts which are alleged. KL&A, INC 1717 WASHINGTON AVE GOLDEN, CO 80401 TEL: 303.384.9910 AEC 40801 US HWY 8 AND 24, SUITE 214 EAGLE-VAIL, CO 81620 TEL: 970.748.8520 SGM 118 W SIXTH ST, SUITE 200 GLENWOOD SPRINGS, CO 81601 TEL: 970.384.9081 N3/28/2023 5:54:36 PMZ-103 EXISTING FLOOR AREA CALCULATIONS 214 W BLEEKER 214 W BLEEKER 214 W BLEEKER STREET ASPEN, CO 81611 APN: 2205 1/8" = 1'-0"1 FLOOR PLAN / EXISTING / BASEMENT 1/8" = 1'-0"2 FLOOR PLAN / EXISTING / LEVEL 1 1/8" = 1'-0"3 FLOOR PLAN / EXISTING / LEVEL 2 AREA CALCS / EXISTING4 SCALE: NTS NOTE: (E) CALCULATED AREAS ARE TAKEN FROM THE CITY OF ASPEN APPROVED PERMIT SET DATED 03/20/2000 * 1/8" = 1'-0"5 SUBGRADE WALL CALCS NO DATE ISSUE 0 03/22/2023 HPC DRAFT EXPOSED SUBGRADE (E)WALL CALCULATIONS WALL TOTAL WALL EXPOSED AREA (SF)WALL AREA (SF) 1 274 - 2 197 - 3 50.5 - 4 100.5 - 5 173 - 6 34 - 7 64 - 8 264 35.9 TOTAL 1,166 SF 35.9 SF ______ TOTAL SUBGRADE WALL AREA: 1,166 SF TOTAL EXPOSED WALL AREA: 35.9 SF % OF WALL AREA: 3.08% TOTAL SUBGRADE FAR AREA: 3.08% X 774.5 (LOWER GROSS FLOOR AREA) = 23.8 SF 85 2282 SF BF -NEW 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 12 13 12' - 0 1/4" 44' - 7 3/4"26' - 2 1/2"19' - 10"19' - 9 3/4" 11' - 11"3'-2 1/4"5'-6 1/2"14 15 16 17 18 19 20 6 1/4"5'-8 3/4"5'-1 1/2"11'-3 1/8"7'-5 1/8"11'-0 1/4"1'-0 3/8"2'-4 1/4"11 7'-11 1/8"9'-8" 1453 SF CONDITIONED 460 SF GARAGE STAIR VOID 23 SF 1546 SF CONDITIONED STAIR VOID 150 SF (N) BASEMENT 110'-9"11'-11" 2 12'-0" 3 3'-2 1/4" 4 11'-3 1/8" 9 44'-7 3/4" (N) BASEMENT 1010'-9"128 SF 129 SF34 SF 121 SF 480 SF 2'-4 1/4" 25 SF 11 26'-2" 281 SF 12 19'-10" (N) BASEMENT 13 213 SF 19'-9 3/4" 213 SF 14 5'-6 1/2" 60 SF 15 9'-8" (N) BASEMENT 1710'-9"104 SF 5'-8 3/4" 61.5 SF 27.75 SF 3' - 0"9' - 3"3' - 0"9' - 3"3' - 0"9' - 3"B.O. STRUCTURE B.O. STRUCTURE B.O. STRUCTURE B.O. STRUCTURE 5 1'-0 3/8" 11 SF 6 7'-5 1/8" 80 SF 7 1'-0 3/8" 11 SF 8 11'-0 1/4" 119 SF 16 6 1/4" 5.5 SF 18 6 1/4" 5.5 SF 19 7'-11 1/8" 85 SF 20 5'-1 1/2" 55 SF10' - 9"27.75 SF 27.75 SF ©2023, RO | ROCKETT DESIGN, INC. DRAWING NUMBER: DRAWING TITLE: PROJECT: NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION OWNER: PROJECT ARCHITECT: RO | ROCKETT DESIGN 1031 W. MANCHESTER BLVD. UNIT 6 INGLEWOOD, CA 90301 TEL: 646.924.9782 CIVIL ENGINEER: ALIENATED MAJESTY, LLC 3111 RICE BOULEVARD HOUSTON, TX 77005 CONTRACTOR: TBD STRUCTURAL ENGINEER: MECHANICAL ENGINEER: PROJECT NUMBER SEAL: All designs, ideas, arrangements and plans indicated by these drawings are the property and copyright of the Architect and shall neither be used on any other work nor be disclosed to any other person for any use whatsoever without written permission. RO|ROCKETT DESIGN and/or its principals and employees waives any and all liability or responsibility for problems that may occur when these plans, drawings, specifications, and/or designs are followed without the designer's guidance with ambiguities, or conflicts which are alleged. KL&A, INC 1717 WASHINGTON AVE GOLDEN, CO 80401 TEL: 303.384.9910 AEC 40801 US HWY 8 AND 24, SUITE 214 EAGLE-VAIL, CO 81620 TEL: 970.748.8520 SGM 118 W SIXTH ST, SUITE 200 GLENWOOD SPRINGS, CO 81601 TEL: 970.384.9081 N3/28/2023 5:54:37 PMZ-104 PROPOSED AREA CALCULATIONS 214 W BLEEKER 214 W BLEEKER 214 W BLEEKER STREET ASPEN, CO 81611 APN: 2205 1/8" = 1'-0"1 FLOOR PLAN / PROPOSED / BASEMENT 1/8" = 1'-0"2 FLOOR PLAN / PROPOSED / LEVEL 1 1/8" = 1'-0"3 FLOOR PLAN / PROPOSED / LEVEL 2 1/8" = 1'-0"4 SUBGRADE WALL CALCS AREA CALCS / PROPOSED4 SCALE: NTS EXPOSED SUBGRADE WALL CALCULATIONS WALL TOTAL WALL EXPOSED AREA (SF)WALL AREA (SF) 1 128 - 2 34 - 3 129 27.75 4 121 - 5 11 - 6 80 - 7 11 - 8 119 - 9 480 55.5 10 25 - 11 281 - 12 213 - 13 213 - 14 60 - 15 104 - 16 5.5 - 17 61.5 - 18 5.5 - 19 85 - 20 55 - TOTAL 2,222 SF 83.25 SF ______ TOTAL SUBGRADE WALL AREA: 2,222 SF TOTAL EXPOSED WALL AREA: 83.25 SF % OF WALL AREA: 3.75% TOTAL SUBGRADE FAR AREA: 3.7% X 2,282 (LOWER GROSS FLOOR AREA)= 85 SF NO DATE ISSUE 0 03/22/2023 HPC DRAFT 86 ©2023, RO | ROCKETT DESIGN, INC. DRAWING NUMBER: DRAWING TITLE: PROJECT: NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION OWNER: PROJECT ARCHITECT: RO | ROCKETT DESIGN 1031 W. MANCHESTER BLVD. UNIT 6 INGLEWOOD, CA 90301 TEL: 646.924.9782 CIVIL ENGINEER: ALIENATED MAJESTY, LLC 3111 RICE BOULEVARD HOUSTON, TX 77005 CONTRACTOR: TBD STRUCTURAL ENGINEER: MECHANICAL ENGINEER: PROJECT NUMBER SEAL: All designs, ideas, arrangements and plans indicated by these drawings are the property and copyright of the Architect and shall neither be used on any other work nor be disclosed to any other person for any use whatsoever without written permission. RO|ROCKETT DESIGN and/or its principals and employees waives any and all liability or responsibility for problems that may occur when these plans, drawings, specifications, and/or designs are followed without the designer's guidance with ambiguities, or conflicts which are alleged. KL&A, INC 1717 WASHINGTON AVE GOLDEN, CO 80401 TEL: 303.384.9910 AEC 40801 US HWY 8 AND 24, SUITE 214 EAGLE-VAIL, CO 81620 TEL: 970.748.8520 SGM 118 W SIXTH ST, SUITE 200 GLENWOOD SPRINGS, CO 81601 TEL: 970.384.9081 N3/28/2023 5:54:37 PMZ-200 BUILDING MATERIALS 214 W BLEEKER 214 W BLEEKER 214 W BLEEKER STREET ASPEN, CO 81611 APN: 2205 [A]EXISTING WOOD SIDING, PAINTED WHITE[B]WOOD CEDAR SHINGLE ROOFING[C]METAL FLASHING, GREY[D]EXISTING BRICK [D] EXISTING BRICK CHIMNEY [B] WOOD CEDAR SHINGLE ROOFING [A] EXISTING WOOD SIDING, WHITE [C] METAL FLASHING GREY EXTERIOR MATERIALS1 SCALE: NTS NO DATE ISSUE 87 88 B L E E K E R S T R E E TSL 12" / 12"SL 12" / 12"SL 18" / 12"SL 18" / 12"SL 8 1/2" / 12"SL 8 1/2" / 12"SETBACK LINESOUTHHISTORIC56" COTTONWOODR 16' - 0"R 24' - 0"R 23' - 0"R 34' - 0"©2023, RO | ROCKETT DESIGN, INC. DRAWING NUMBER:DRAWING TITLE:PROJECT:NOT FOR CONSTRUCTIONOWNER:PROJECT ARCHITECT:RO | ROCKETTDESIGN1031 W. MANCHESTER BLVD. UNIT 6 INGLEWOOD, CA 90301TEL: 646.924.9782CIVIL ENGINEER:ALIENATED MAJESTY, LLC 3111 RICE BOULEVARDHOUSTON, TX 77005CONTRACTOR:TBDSTRUCTURAL ENGINEER:MECHANICAL ENGINEER:PROJECT NUMBERSEAL:All designs, ideas, arrangements and plans indicated by these drawings are the property and copyright of the Architect and shall neither be used on any other work nor be disclosed to any other person for any use whatsoever without written permission.RO|ROCKETT DESIGN and/or its principals and employees waives any and all liability or responsibility for problems that may occur when these plans, drawings, specifications, and/or designs are followed without the designer's guidance with ambiguities, or conflicts which are alleged.KL&A, INC1717 WASHINGTON AVEGOLDEN, CO 80401TEL: 303.384.9910AEC40801 US HWY 8 AND 24, SUITE 214EAGLE-VAIL, CO 81620TEL: 970.748.8520SGM118 W SIXTH ST, SUITE 200GLENWOOD SPRINGS, CO 81601TEL: 970.384.9081N3/29/2023 4:43:07 PMZ-300FRONT TREE DIAGRAM214 W BLEEKER214 W BLEEKER214 W BLEEKER STREETASPEN, CO 81611APN:2205NO DATE ISSUE56" COTTONWOODTREE RADIUS PLAN1SCALE: 1/4" = 1'-0"IMAGES2SCALE: 1/4" = 1'-0"89 BATHGARAGE SLAB ABOVECRAWL SPACEEGRESS WELLLAUNDRYBATHEGRESS WELLREMOVE (E)CASEWORKREMOVE (E)WINDOWREMOVE (E)CONC WALL, TYPREMOVE (E)STAIR AND STRUCTUREREMOVE (E)CONC WALL, TYPROOM(E)FLOOR FINISHES AND SUBFLOOR TO BE REMOVEDLEGENDDEMO WALL(E) WALL TO KEEPSOUTHREMOVE CRAWL SPACE1/4" = 1'-0"1FLOOR PLAN / BASEMENT / DEMO©2023, RO | ROCKETT DESIGN, INC. DRAWING NUMBER:DRAWING TITLE:PROJECT:NOT FOR CONSTRUCTIONOWNER:PROJECT ARCHITECT:RO | ROCKETTDESIGN1031 W. MANCHESTER BLVD. UNIT 6 INGLEWOOD, CA 90301TEL: 646.924.9782CIVIL ENGINEER:ALIENATED MAJESTY, LLC 3111 RICE BOULEVARDHOUSTON, TX 77005CONTRACTOR:TBDSTRUCTURAL ENGINEER:MECHANICAL ENGINEER:PROJECT NUMBERSEAL:All designs, ideas, arrangements and plans indicated by these drawings are the property and copyright of the Architect and shall neither be used on any other work nor be disclosed to any other person for any use whatsoever without written permission.RO|ROCKETT DESIGN and/or its principals and employees waives any and all liability or responsibility for problems that may occur when these plans, drawings, specifications, and/or designs are followed without the designer's guidance with ambiguities, or conflicts which are alleged.KL&A, INC1717 WASHINGTON AVEGOLDEN, CO 80401TEL: 303.384.9910AEC40801 US HWY 8 AND 24, SUITE 214EAGLE-VAIL, CO 81620TEL: 970.748.8520SGM118 W SIXTH ST, SUITE 200GLENWOOD SPRINGS, CO 81601TEL: 970.384.9081N2/10/2023 7:53:43 PMA-010FLOOR PLAN / BASEMENT /DEMO214 W BLEEKER214 W BLEEKER214 W BLEEKER STREETASPEN, CO 81611APN:2205NO DATEISSUE0 03/22/2023HPC DRAFTEASTSETBACK LINESETBACK LINEHISTORIC90 (E)FLOOR FINISHES AND SUB-FLOOR TO BE REMOVED (E)KITCHEN ISLAND TO BE REMOVED (E)KITCHEN TO BE REMOVED REMOVE (E)STAIRS AND STRUCTURE GARAGE KITCHEN BEDROOM LIVING (E) FIREPLACE TO REMAIN SETBACK LINESETBACK LINE LEGEND DEMO WALL (E) WALL TO KEEP SOUTHEAST REMOVE (E)SHED REMOVE (E) NON- HISTORIC DOOR REMOVE (E) NON- HISTORIC WINDOW REMOVE (E) NON- HISTORIC WINDOW REMOVE (E) NON- HISTORIC WINDOW (E) HISTORIC SHED REMOVE (E) STONE PAVERS, SLD REMOVE (E)STORAGE REMOVE (E) FLOORING AND SUB-STRUCTURE PRESERVE HISTORIC SHED HISTORIC©2023, RO | ROCKETT DESIGN, INC. DRAWING NUMBER: DRAWING TITLE: PROJECT: NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION OWNER: PROJECT ARCHITECT: RO | ROCKETT DESIGN 1031 W. MANCHESTER BLVD. UNIT 6 INGLEWOOD, CA 90301 TEL: 646.924.9782 CIVIL ENGINEER: ALIENATED MAJESTY, LLC 3111 RICE BOULEVARD HOUSTON, TX 77005 CONTRACTOR: TBD STRUCTURAL ENGINEER: MECHANICAL ENGINEER: PROJECT NUMBER SEAL: All designs, ideas, arrangements and plans indicated by these drawings are the property and copyright of the Architect and shall neither be used on any other work nor be disclosed to any other person for any use whatsoever without written permission. RO|ROCKETT DESIGN and/or its principals and employees waives any and all liability or responsibility for problems that may occur when these plans, drawings, specifications, and/or designs are followed without the designer's guidance with ambiguities, or conflicts which are alleged. KL&A, INC 1717 WASHINGTON AVE GOLDEN, CO 80401 TEL: 303.384.9910 AEC 40801 US HWY 8 AND 24, SUITE 214 EAGLE-VAIL, CO 81620 TEL: 970.748.8520 SGM 118 W SIXTH ST, SUITE 200 GLENWOOD SPRINGS, CO 81601 TEL: 970.384.9081 N3/28/2023 5:53:20 PMA-011 DEMOLITION PLAN / LEVEL 1 214 W BLEEKER 214 W BLEEKER 214 W BLEEKER STREET ASPEN, CO 81611 APN: 2205 1/4" = 1'-0"1 FLOOR PLAN / LEVEL 1 / DEMO NO DATE ISSUE 0 03/22/2023 HPC DRAFT 91 MASTER BED BEDROOM BATH SHOWER WC OPEN TO BELOW DN BATH BEDROOM BEDROOM W.I.C. (E)FLOOR FINISHES AND SUB-FLOOR TO BE REMOVED (E) FLOOR FRAMING TO BE REINFORCED OR REPLACED AS REQ'D (E)STAIRS TO BE REMOVED (E)CHIMNEY WALL TO REMAIN SETBACK LINESETBACK LINE LEGEND DEMO WALL (E) WALL TO KEEP SOUTHEAST HISTORIC©2023, RO | ROCKETT DESIGN, INC. DRAWING NUMBER: DRAWING TITLE: PROJECT: NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION OWNER: PROJECT ARCHITECT: RO | ROCKETT DESIGN 1031 W. MANCHESTER BLVD. UNIT 6 INGLEWOOD, CA 90301 TEL: 646.924.9782 CIVIL ENGINEER: ALIENATED MAJESTY, LLC 3111 RICE BOULEVARD HOUSTON, TX 77005 CONTRACTOR: TBD STRUCTURAL ENGINEER: MECHANICAL ENGINEER: PROJECT NUMBER SEAL: All designs, ideas, arrangements and plans indicated by these drawings are the property and copyright of the Architect and shall neither be used on any other work nor be disclosed to any other person for any use whatsoever without written permission. RO|ROCKETT DESIGN and/or its principals and employees waives any and all liability or responsibility for problems that may occur when these plans, drawings, specifications, and/or designs are followed without the designer's guidance with ambiguities, or conflicts which are alleged. KL&A, INC 1717 WASHINGTON AVE GOLDEN, CO 80401 TEL: 303.384.9910 AEC 40801 US HWY 8 AND 24, SUITE 214 EAGLE-VAIL, CO 81620 TEL: 970.748.8520 SGM 118 W SIXTH ST, SUITE 200 GLENWOOD SPRINGS, CO 81601 TEL: 970.384.9081 N3/28/2023 5:53:21 PMA-012 DEMOLITION PLAN / LEVEL 2 214 W BLEEKER 214 W BLEEKER 214 W BLEEKER STREET ASPEN, CO 81611 APN: 2205 1/4" = 1'-0"1 CD-00-010-LEVEL 2 NO DATE ISSUE 0 03/22/2023 HPC DRAFT 92 C C D D E E F F G G H H B B 11 22 33 44 55 66 A A (E) DNDN DNDN DNDN DNDNDNDN DNDNDNDN DNDN DNDNDNDN(E)SETBACK LINESETBACK LINE DN DNDNSOUTHEAST 3'-5"10'-11 3/8"11'-0 1/8"6'-7 3/4"6'-2 1/4"20'-10 1/2"6'-4 5/8"15'-9 1/2"3'-10 1/2" HISTORIC 29'-0 1/2" REMOVE (E) SKYLIGHT HISTORIC(E) SHINGLES AND ROOFING TO BE REPLACED (E) BRICK CHIMNEY TO BE REINSTALLED AFTER HISTORIC ASSET IS REINSTALLEDSIDE SETBACK10'-0"SIDE SETBACK5'-0"FRONT SETBACK 10'-0" REAR SETBACK 10'-0" E N EXISTING TREE TYPE NEW TREE SITE PLAN LEGEND X TREE TO BE DEMO'D ©2023, RO | ROCKETT DESIGN, INC. DRAWING NUMBER: DRAWING TITLE: PROJECT: NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION OWNER: PROJECT ARCHITECT: RO | ROCKETT DESIGN 1031 W. MANCHESTER BLVD. UNIT 6 INGLEWOOD, CA 90301 TEL: 646.924.9782 CIVIL ENGINEER: ALIENATED MAJESTY, LLC 3111 RICE BOULEVARD HOUSTON, TX 77005 CONTRACTOR: TBD STRUCTURAL ENGINEER: MECHANICAL ENGINEER: PROJECT NUMBER SEAL: All designs, ideas, arrangements and plans indicated by these drawings are the property and copyright of the Architect and shall neither be used on any other work nor be disclosed to any other person for any use whatsoever without written permission. RO|ROCKETT DESIGN and/or its principals and employees waives any and all liability or responsibility for problems that may occur when these plans, drawings, specifications, and/or designs are followed without the designer's guidance with ambiguities, or conflicts which are alleged. KL&A, INC 1717 WASHINGTON AVE GOLDEN, CO 80401 TEL: 303.384.9910 AEC 40801 US HWY 8 AND 24, SUITE 214 EAGLE-VAIL, CO 81620 TEL: 970.748.8520 SGM 118 W SIXTH ST, SUITE 200 GLENWOOD SPRINGS, CO 81601 TEL: 970.384.9081 N3/28/2023 5:53:22 PMA-013 DEMOLITION PLAN / ROOF 214 W BLEEKER 214 W BLEEKER 214 W BLEEKER STREET ASPEN, CO 81611 APN: 2205 1/4" = 1'-0"1 FLOOR PLAN / ROOF / DEMO NO DATE ISSUE 0 03/22/2023 HPC DRAFT 93 E N EXISTING TREE TYPE NEW TREE SITE PLAN LEGEND B L E E K E R S T R E E TSL 12" / 12"SL 12" / 12"SL 18" / 12"SL 18" / 12"SL 8 1/2" / 12"SL 12" / 12"SL 12" / 12"SL 3" / 12"SL 12" / 12"SL 16" / 12"SL 8 1/2" / 12"SL 12" / 12"SL 12" / 12"SL 12" / 12"SL 16" / 12"SL 16" / 12"SL 16" / 12" SL 16" / 12"SL 16" / 12"SL 16" / 12"SL 16" / 12" EW EW EW (E) HISTORICAL SHED 3 1/2" / 12" (N)(N)(N) (N) (N) ASPEN TREES NEW ASPEN TREE (N) SKYLIGHT, SEE SCHED 6' TALL PTD (N) WD FENCE (N) SAND SET STONE PAVER WALKWAY (N) SKYLIGHT, SEE SCHED SETBACK LINESETBACK LINE SOUTHEAST HISTORIC(E) NEIGHBOR HOUSE, NIC (E) NEIGHBOR HOUSE, NIC (N) EXT STN PAVERS (E) LAWN TO REMAIN FRONT SETBACK 10'-0" REAR SETBACK 10'-0"SIDE SETBACK10' - 0"SIDE SETBACK5' - 0"©2023, RO | ROCKETT DESIGN, INC. DRAWING NUMBER: DRAWING TITLE: PROJECT: NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION OWNER: PROJECT ARCHITECT: RO | ROCKETT DESIGN 1031 W. MANCHESTER BLVD. UNIT 6 INGLEWOOD, CA 90301 TEL: 646.924.9782 CIVIL ENGINEER: ALIENATED MAJESTY, LLC 3111 RICE BOULEVARD HOUSTON, TX 77005 CONTRACTOR: TBD STRUCTURAL ENGINEER: MECHANICAL ENGINEER: PROJECT NUMBER SEAL: All designs, ideas, arrangements and plans indicated by these drawings are the property and copyright of the Architect and shall neither be used on any other work nor be disclosed to any other person for any use whatsoever without written permission. RO|ROCKETT DESIGN and/or its principals and employees waives any and all liability or responsibility for problems that may occur when these plans, drawings, specifications, and/or designs are followed without the designer's guidance with ambiguities, or conflicts which are alleged. KL&A, INC 1717 WASHINGTON AVE GOLDEN, CO 80401 TEL: 303.384.9910 AEC 40801 US HWY 8 AND 24, SUITE 214 EAGLE-VAIL, CO 81620 TEL: 970.748.8520 SGM 118 W SIXTH ST, SUITE 200 GLENWOOD SPRINGS, CO 81601 TEL: 970.384.9081 N3/28/2023 5:53:23 PMA-100 SITE PLAN 214 W BLEEKER 214 W BLEEKER 214 W BLEEKER STREET ASPEN, CO 81611 APN: 2205 1/4" = 1'-0"1 SITE PLAN NO DATE ISSUE 0 03/22/2023 HPC DRAFT 94 UP A-300 A-3011A-301 2 A-300 1 2 C C D D E E F F G G H H B B 11 22 33 44 55 66 A A W/D EW EW EW OPEN ABOVE SETBACK LINESETBACK LINE MECH 1 08 BEDROOM 06 BEDROOM 05 BATH 05.1 REC ROOM 00 006 004 002E 001E 009007 003E -12' - 1 7/8"SOUTHEAST 3'-5"10'-11 3/8"11'-0 1/8"6'-7 3/4"6'-2 1/4"20'-10 1/2"6'-4 5/8"15'-9 1/2"3'-10 1/2" HISTORIC 29'-0 1/2" 2 A-400 2 A-400 1 A-400 1 A-400 BATH 06.1 008 10'-11 5/8" BEDROOM 03 BATH 03.1 6'-3 1/2"5'-10"LAUNDRY 01 POWDER 09 MECH 2 02 001 002 005010003 13' - 5"20' - 7"26' - 4 3/4"14' - 7 1/2"14' - 8" 8' - 10 1/2"5' - 10 1/2"3' - 4"10' - 2 1/2" 5' - 4"6' - 0"12' - 6"13' - 3 1/2"HISTORICSIDE SETBACK10' - 0"SIDE SETBACK5' - 0"LINE OF HOUSE ABOVE, DASHED W/D P01 1 2 4 FRONT SETBACK 10'-0" REAR SETBACK 10'-0" ©2023, RO | ROCKETT DESIGN, INC. DRAWING NUMBER: DRAWING TITLE: PROJECT: NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION OWNER: PROJECT ARCHITECT: RO | ROCKETT DESIGN 1031 W. MANCHESTER BLVD. UNIT 6 INGLEWOOD, CA 90301 TEL: 646.924.9782 CIVIL ENGINEER: ALIENATED MAJESTY, LLC 3111 RICE BOULEVARD HOUSTON, TX 77005 CONTRACTOR: TBD STRUCTURAL ENGINEER: MECHANICAL ENGINEER: PROJECT NUMBER SEAL: All designs, ideas, arrangements and plans indicated by these drawings are the property and copyright of the Architect and shall neither be used on any other work nor be disclosed to any other person for any use whatsoever without written permission. RO|ROCKETT DESIGN and/or its principals and employees waives any and all liability or responsibility for problems that may occur when these plans, drawings, specifications, and/or designs are followed without the designer's guidance with ambiguities, or conflicts which are alleged. KL&A, INC 1717 WASHINGTON AVE GOLDEN, CO 80401 TEL: 303.384.9910 AEC 40801 US HWY 8 AND 24, SUITE 214 EAGLE-VAIL, CO 81620 TEL: 970.748.8520 SGM 118 W SIXTH ST, SUITE 200 GLENWOOD SPRINGS, CO 81601 TEL: 970.384.9081 N3/28/2023 5:53:23 PMA-101 FLOOR PLAN / BASEMENT 214 W BLEEKER 214 W BLEEKER 214 W BLEEKER STREET ASPEN, CO 81611 APN: 2205 1/4" = 1'-0"1 FLOOR PLAN / PROPOSED / BASEMENT NO DATE ISSUE 0 03/22/2023 HPC DRAFT 95 UP A-300 A-3011A-301 2 A-300 1 2 HISTORIC SHED OPEN 76'-4" C C D D E E F F G G H H B B 11 22 33 44 55 66 A A GARAGE 100 (E) F.P.BENCH12'-3 1/4"EW REF 76'-4"SETBACK LINESETBACK LINE EW OFFICE 108 POWDER 107 PANTRY 103 LIVING 106 KITCHEN 102 MUD 101 DINING 105107 ENTRY (E)103(E)104(E)105 (E)106(E)105 (E)101 102(E)112 100(E)100(E)107(E)111 (E)109 (E)106 (E)110 101 (E)108 111114 (E)112113 0' - 0" [STN-10] SL [CONC-2] HP: 8' - 1" LP: 7' - 8"SOUTHEAST 3'-5"10'-11 3/8"11'-0 1/8"6'-7 3/4"6'-2 1/4"20'-10 1/2"6'-4 5/8"15'-9 1/2"3'-10 1/2" HISTORIC 29'-0 1/2" MAIN STAIR 104 0' - 0" [STN-10] 2 A-400 2 A-400 4'-6"4'-3" 0' - 0" 0' - 0" 1 A-400 1 A-400 EW 110COATS SIDE SETBACK5' - 0"16' - 8 1/2"8' - 0 3/4"13' - 0"6' - 7 3/4" (N) (N) ASPEN TREESHISTORIC (E) NEIGHBOR HOUSE, NIC (E) NEIGHBOR HOUSE, NIC FRONT SETBACK 10' - 0"SIDE SETBACK10' - 0"SIDE SETBACK5' - 0"(EH)(EH)(EH)(N) SAND SET STONE PAVER WALKWAY 6' TALL PTD (N) WD FENCE 6' TALL PTD (N) WD FENCE A-802 1 REF A-800 3 P01 1 2 4 FRONT SETBACK 10'-0" REAR SETBACK 10'-0" ©2023, RO | ROCKETT DESIGN, INC. DRAWING NUMBER: DRAWING TITLE: PROJECT: NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION OWNER: PROJECT ARCHITECT: RO | ROCKETT DESIGN 1031 W. MANCHESTER BLVD. UNIT 6 INGLEWOOD, CA 90301 TEL: 646.924.9782 CIVIL ENGINEER: ALIENATED MAJESTY, LLC 3111 RICE BOULEVARD HOUSTON, TX 77005 CONTRACTOR: TBD STRUCTURAL ENGINEER: MECHANICAL ENGINEER: PROJECT NUMBER SEAL: All designs, ideas, arrangements and plans indicated by these drawings are the property and copyright of the Architect and shall neither be used on any other work nor be disclosed to any other person for any use whatsoever without written permission. RO|ROCKETT DESIGN and/or its principals and employees waives any and all liability or responsibility for problems that may occur when these plans, drawings, specifications, and/or designs are followed without the designer's guidance with ambiguities, or conflicts which are alleged. KL&A, INC 1717 WASHINGTON AVE GOLDEN, CO 80401 TEL: 303.384.9910 AEC 40801 US HWY 8 AND 24, SUITE 214 EAGLE-VAIL, CO 81620 TEL: 970.748.8520 SGM 118 W SIXTH ST, SUITE 200 GLENWOOD SPRINGS, CO 81601 TEL: 970.384.9081 N3/28/2023 5:53:26 PMA-102 FLOOR PLAN / LEVEL 1 214 W BLEEKER 214 W BLEEKER 214 W BLEEKER STREET ASPEN, CO 81611 APN: 2205 1/4" = 1'-0"1 FLOOR PLAN / PROPOSED / LEVEL 1 NO DATE ISSUE 0 03/22/2023 HPC DRAFT 96 DN DN OPEN A-300 A-3011A-301 2 A-300 1 2 C C D D E E F F G G H H B B 11 22 33 44 55 66 A A SETBACK LINESETBACK LINE 20'-10 1/2"6'-4 5/8"15'-9 1/2"3'-10 1/2" HISTORIC 29'-0 1/2"(E)207(E)206(E)208 (E)209 (E)205 (E)204 (E)203A (E)201 (E)212 (E)200205206121 201 122 BEDROOM SUITE 201 MASTER BED 200 MASTER CLOSET 200.1 MASTER BATH 200.3 BATHROOM 201.2 CORRIDOR WC 200.2 WC 201.3 DN DNDNEXT DECK 3'-6"10' - 7" [STN-10] 9' - 6" [WD-10] 10' - 7" [STN-10] 9' - 6" [WD-10]SOUTHEAST 3'-5"10'-11 3/8"11'-0 1/8"6'-7 3/4"6'-2 1/4"2 A-400 2 A-400 1 A-400 1 A-400 3'-6"CLOSET 201.1 4'-0"1'-6"10' - 7" 14' - 0 3/16"3' - 2 1/8"20' - 11"14' - 10 1/8"14' - 3 1/4"13' - 9 1/4" 8' - 6 7/16"6' - 0"SKYLIGHT ABV SKYLIGHT ABV HISTORICSKYLIGHT ABV (E) NEIGHBOR HOUSE, NIC (E) NEIGHBOR HOUSE, NIC SIDE SETBACK10' - 0"SIDE SETBACK5' - 0"A-801 5 A-801 8 P01 1 2 4 FRONT SETBACK 10'-0" REAR SETBACK 10'-0" ©2023, RO | ROCKETT DESIGN, INC. DRAWING NUMBER: DRAWING TITLE: PROJECT: NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION OWNER: PROJECT ARCHITECT: RO | ROCKETT DESIGN 1031 W. MANCHESTER BLVD. UNIT 6 INGLEWOOD, CA 90301 TEL: 646.924.9782 CIVIL ENGINEER: ALIENATED MAJESTY, LLC 3111 RICE BOULEVARD HOUSTON, TX 77005 CONTRACTOR: TBD STRUCTURAL ENGINEER: MECHANICAL ENGINEER: PROJECT NUMBER SEAL: All designs, ideas, arrangements and plans indicated by these drawings are the property and copyright of the Architect and shall neither be used on any other work nor be disclosed to any other person for any use whatsoever without written permission. RO|ROCKETT DESIGN and/or its principals and employees waives any and all liability or responsibility for problems that may occur when these plans, drawings, specifications, and/or designs are followed without the designer's guidance with ambiguities, or conflicts which are alleged. KL&A, INC 1717 WASHINGTON AVE GOLDEN, CO 80401 TEL: 303.384.9910 AEC 40801 US HWY 8 AND 24, SUITE 214 EAGLE-VAIL, CO 81620 TEL: 970.748.8520 SGM 118 W SIXTH ST, SUITE 200 GLENWOOD SPRINGS, CO 81601 TEL: 970.384.9081 N3/28/2023 5:53:27 PMA-103 FLOOR PLAN / LEVEL 2 214 W BLEEKER 214 W BLEEKER 214 W BLEEKER STREET ASPEN, CO 81611 APN: 2205 1/4" = 1'-0"1 FLOOR PLAN / PROPOSED / LEVEL 2 NO DATE ISSUE 0 03/22/2023 HPC DRAFT 97 ROOF PLAN NOTES: 1. SEE LANDSCAPE PLAN FOR (E) AND (N) TREE LOCATIONS. 2. SEE CIVIL DRAWINGS FOR DRIVEWAY LAYOUT, PROFILE & SITE DRAINAGE INFORMATION. 3. ALL GUTTERS TO BE NON-COMBUSTIBLE MATERIAL. 4. ALL GUTTERS TO HAVE HEAT-TRACE SYSTEM AND APPROVED SCREEN TO MITIGATE DEBRIS ACCUMULATION. 5. GC TO COORDINATE SNOW FENCE INSTALLATION WITH MFR AND ARCHITECT, COLOR TO MATCH ROOFING. 6. ALL ROOFING TO BE CLASS 'A' W/ ROOF EDGES/GAPS FIRESTOPPED + 26 GA VALLEY FLASHING AS REQD, EAVES:1-HR FRC, IR1 MATERIAL, FASCIA:1-HR FRC, IR MATERIAL, OR 1" NOMINAL DIMENSION LUMBER. 7. VENTS:<144 IN2, <1/4" NON-COMBUSTIBLE CORROSION RESISTANT MESH OR APPROVED DEVICE A-300 A-3011A-301 2 A-300 1 2 C C D D E E F F G G H H B B 11 22 33 44 55 66 A A (E) DNDN DNDN DNDN DNDNDNDN DNDNDNDN DNDN DNDNDNDN(E) (N)SETBACK LINESETBACK LINE (N) (N) (N) (N) (N) DN DNDN300.2 300.1 303.1 301.1 302 SOUTHEAST 3'-5"10'-11 3/8"11'-0 1/8"6'-7 3/4"6'-2 1/4"20'-10 1/2"6'-4 5/8"15'-9 1/2"3'-10 1/2" HISTORIC 29'-0 1/2" 2 A-400 2 A-400 1 A-400 1 A-400 HISTORIC(EH)301.2 (N) (N) (EH)303.2 (E) BRICK CHIMNEY TO BE REINSTALLED AFTER HISTORIC ASSET IS REINSTALLEDSIDE SETBACK10' - 0"SIDE SETBACK5' - 0"(N) SKYLIGHT, SEE SCHED (E) NEIGHBOR HOUSE, NIC (E) NEIGHBOR HOUSE, NIC (N) 6' TALL PTD WD FENCE (N) WD DOOR AT FENCE (N) WD DOOR AT FENCE (N) SKYLIGHT, SEE SCHED (N) SKYLIGHT, SEE SCHED PLUMBING VENTS PLUMBING VENTS SNOW STOPS AT ALL LOCATIONS ABOVE WALKWAYS, STAIRS, DECKS AND UTILITIES TYP PER LOCAL ORDINANCE R903.6 P01 1 2 4 FRONT SETBACK 10'-0" REAR SETBACK 10'-0" ©2023, RO | ROCKETT DESIGN, INC. DRAWING NUMBER: DRAWING TITLE: PROJECT: NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION OWNER: PROJECT ARCHITECT: RO | ROCKETT DESIGN 1031 W. MANCHESTER BLVD. UNIT 6 INGLEWOOD, CA 90301 TEL: 646.924.9782 CIVIL ENGINEER: ALIENATED MAJESTY, LLC 3111 RICE BOULEVARD HOUSTON, TX 77005 CONTRACTOR: TBD STRUCTURAL ENGINEER: MECHANICAL ENGINEER: PROJECT NUMBER SEAL: All designs, ideas, arrangements and plans indicated by these drawings are the property and copyright of the Architect and shall neither be used on any other work nor be disclosed to any other person for any use whatsoever without written permission. RO|ROCKETT DESIGN and/or its principals and employees waives any and all liability or responsibility for problems that may occur when these plans, drawings, specifications, and/or designs are followed without the designer's guidance with ambiguities, or conflicts which are alleged. KL&A, INC 1717 WASHINGTON AVE GOLDEN, CO 80401 TEL: 303.384.9910 AEC 40801 US HWY 8 AND 24, SUITE 214 EAGLE-VAIL, CO 81620 TEL: 970.748.8520 SGM 118 W SIXTH ST, SUITE 200 GLENWOOD SPRINGS, CO 81601 TEL: 970.384.9081 N3/28/2023 5:53:28 PMA-104 FLOOR PLAN / ROOF 214 W BLEEKER 214 W BLEEKER 214 W BLEEKER STREET ASPEN, CO 81611 APN: 2205 1/4" = 1'-0"1 FLOOR PLAN / PROPOSED / ROOF NO DATE ISSUE 0 03/22/2023 HPC DRAFT 98 (E)BASEMENT -8' -7" (E) LEVEL 1 FF 0' -0" (E) LEVEL 2 10' -7" (E) ROOF 26' -7" NEW BASEMENT -12' -1" C D E F G HBA PROPOSED EGRESS WELL PROPOSED BASEMENT FOOTPRINT (E) HISTORIC SHED 105 (E)106 (E)105 (E)112 (E)111 (E)109 106 (E)110 (E)208(E)209 (E)212 (EH)101 (E)108 300.2 001E HISTORIC 29' - 0 1/2" 20'-10 1/2"6'-4 5/8"15'-9 1/2"3'-10 1/2"14'-0 1/2"13'-1"1'-11" (E)223 200 (E)222 2' - 6"[L10][L10] [L10][L10] NEW WINDOW, SEE SCHED SETBACK LINE(N) CLASS A CEDAR SHINGLE ROOF (N) CLASS A CEDAR SHINGLE ROOF (E) WOOD SIDING TO BE REPLACED AS NEEDED. NEW PAINT AT ALL (E) WOOD SIDING TO BE REPLACED AS NEEDED. NEW PAINT AT ALL (N) PTD METAL FLASHING 1' - 6"[L10] REFINISH (E) HISTORIC PORCH & FRONT DOOR T.O. (E)ROOF PITCH 26' -11" T.O. (E)ROOF PITCH 21' -9" (E) ROOF EAVE 18' -9 1/4" 12" 12"HISTORIC ASSETNON-HISTORICHISTORIC ASSETNON-HISTORIC(E)BASEMENT -8' -7" (E) LEVEL 1 FF 0' -0" (E) LEVEL 2 10' -7" (E) ROOF 26' -7" NEW BASEMENT -12' -1" CDEFGH B A HISTORIC 29' - 0 1/2"20'-10 1/2"6'-4 5/8"15'-9 1/2"3'-10 1/2" (E) HISTORIC SHED PROPOSED BASEMENT FOOTPRINT PROPOSED BASEMENT FOOTPRINT PROPOSED EGRESS WELL (N) CLASS A CEDAR SHINGLE ROOF (E)101 (E)205 (E)204 (E)203A (E)201 (E)300.2 003E 002E SETBACK LINESETBACK LINE[L10] (N) CLASS A CEDAR SHINGLE ROOF (E) WOOD SIDING TO BE REPLACED AS NEEDED. NEW PAINT AT ALL (E) WOOD SIDING TO BE REPLACED AS NEEDED. NEW PAINT AT ALL (E) BRICK CHIMNEY TO BE REINSTALLED AFTER HISTORIC ASSET IS REINSTALLED 1' - 6"2' - 6"[L10] T.O. (E)ROOF PITCH 24' -0" 12" 18" (E) ROOF EAVE 11' -11 3/4" (E) ROOF HEIGHT 15' -11 3/4" 120 HISTORIC ASSETNON-HISTORICHISTORIC ASSETNON-HISTORIC1/4" = 1'-0"1 ELEVATION / PROPOSED / EAST ©2023, RO | ROCKETT DESIGN, INC. DRAWING NUMBER: DRAWING TITLE: PROJECT: NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION OWNER: PROJECT ARCHITECT: RO | ROCKETT DESIGN 1031 W. MANCHESTER BLVD. UNIT 6 INGLEWOOD, CA 90301 TEL: 646.924.9782 CIVIL ENGINEER: ALIENATED MAJESTY, LLC 3111 RICE BOULEVARD HOUSTON, TX 77005 CONTRACTOR: TBD STRUCTURAL ENGINEER: MECHANICAL ENGINEER: PROJECT NUMBER SEAL: All designs, ideas, arrangements and plans indicated by these drawings are the property and copyright of the Architect and shall neither be used on any other work nor be disclosed to any other person for any use whatsoever without written permission. RO|ROCKETT DESIGN and/or its principals and employees waives any and all liability or responsibility for problems that may occur when these plans, drawings, specifications, and/or designs are followed without the designer's guidance with ambiguities, or conflicts which are alleged. KL&A, INC 1717 WASHINGTON AVE GOLDEN, CO 80401 TEL: 303.384.9910 AEC 40801 US HWY 8 AND 24, SUITE 214 EAGLE-VAIL, CO 81620 TEL: 970.748.8520 SGM 118 W SIXTH ST, SUITE 200 GLENWOOD SPRINGS, CO 81601 TEL: 970.384.9081 N3/28/2023 5:53:47 PMA-300 EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS 214 W BLEEKER 214 W BLEEKER 214 W BLEEKER STREET ASPEN, CO 81611 APN: 2205 1/4" = 1'-0"2 ELEVATION / PROPOSED / WEST NO DATE ISSUE 0 03/22/2023 HPC DRAFT 99 (E)BASEMENT -8' -7" (E) LEVEL 1 FF 0' -0" (E) LEVEL 2 10' -7" (E) ROOF 26' -7" NEW BASEMENT -12' -1" 123456 SKYLIGHT, SEE SCHED (E) HISTORIC SHED, DASHED FOR CLARITY PTD MTL 'K'-STYLE GUTTER AND DOWNSPOUT; REPLACE (E) GUTTER / DOWNSPOUT WHERE NEEDED; ADD (N) GUTTER TO MATCH (E) WHERE REQ'D 6'-2 1/4"6'-7 3/4"11'-0 1/8"10'-11 3/8"3'-5" FOOTPRINT OF (N) BASEMENT WOOD GUARDRAIL AND DECK TO MATCH EXISTING, REPAIR AS NEEDED (N) CLASS A CEDAR SHINGLE ROOF (E)103(E)104 (E)107 (E)207 (E)206 107 303.1 [L10][L10] NEW WINDOW, SEE SCHED (N) CLASS A CEDAR SHINGLE ROOF (E) WOOD SIDING TO BE REPLACED AS NEEDED. NEW PAINT AT ALL (N) PAINTED WHITE WOOD FENCE, SLD (N) PAINTED WHITE WOOD FENCE, SLD. NOT SHOWN FOR CLARITY 301.2 12" 12" T.O. (E) ROOF PITCH 28' -5 1/2" (E) EAVE POINT 17' -2" (E) ROOF HEIGHT 20' -11 1/4" (E)BASEMENT -8' -7" (E) LEVEL 1 FF 0' -0" (E) LEVEL 2 10' -7" (E) ROOF 26' -7" NEW BASEMENT -12' -1" 1 2 3 4 5 6 3'-5"10'-11 3/8"11'-0 1/8"6'-7 3/4"6'-2 1/4"26'-7"FOOTPRINT OF (N) BASEMENT SKYLIGHT, SEE SCHED (EH)102 (EH)100 (E)100 (E)200 213 NEW WINDOW, SEE SCHED (N) CLASS A CEDAR SHINGLE ROOF (N) CLASS A CEDAR SHINGLE ROOF (E) WOOD SIDING TO BE REPLACED AS NEEDED. NEW PAINT AT ALL (E) WOOD SIDING TO BE REPLACED AS NEEDED. NEW PAINT AT ALL (N) PAINTED WHITE WOOD FENCE, SLD. NOT SHOWN FOR CLARITY (N) PAINTED WHITE WOOD FENCE 303.2 301.1 REFINISH (E) HISTORIC PORCH & FRONT DOOR SKYLIGHT, SEE SCHED (E) BRICK CHIMNEY TO BE REINSTALLED AFTER HISTORIC ASSET IS REINSTALLED T.O. (E)ROOF PITCH 24' -8 1/2" 12" 12" (E)ROOF EAVE 12' -4 1/4" (E)ROOF HEIGHT 16' -5 3/4" ©2023, RO | ROCKETT DESIGN, INC. DRAWING NUMBER: DRAWING TITLE: PROJECT: NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION OWNER: PROJECT ARCHITECT: RO | ROCKETT DESIGN 1031 W. MANCHESTER BLVD. UNIT 6 INGLEWOOD, CA 90301 TEL: 646.924.9782 CIVIL ENGINEER: ALIENATED MAJESTY, LLC 3111 RICE BOULEVARD HOUSTON, TX 77005 CONTRACTOR: TBD STRUCTURAL ENGINEER: MECHANICAL ENGINEER: PROJECT NUMBER SEAL: All designs, ideas, arrangements and plans indicated by these drawings are the property and copyright of the Architect and shall neither be used on any other work nor be disclosed to any other person for any use whatsoever without written permission. RO|ROCKETT DESIGN and/or its principals and employees waives any and all liability or responsibility for problems that may occur when these plans, drawings, specifications, and/or designs are followed without the designer's guidance with ambiguities, or conflicts which are alleged. KL&A, INC 1717 WASHINGTON AVE GOLDEN, CO 80401 TEL: 303.384.9910 AEC 40801 US HWY 8 AND 24, SUITE 214 EAGLE-VAIL, CO 81620 TEL: 970.748.8520 SGM 118 W SIXTH ST, SUITE 200 GLENWOOD SPRINGS, CO 81601 TEL: 970.384.9081 N3/28/2023 5:54:03 PMA-301 EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS 214 W BLEEKER 214 W BLEEKER 214 W BLEEKER STREET ASPEN, CO 81611 APN: 2205 1/4" = 1'-0"2 ELEVATION / PROPOSED / NORTH 1/4" = 1'-0"1 ELEVATION / PROPOSED / SOUTH NO DATE ISSUE 0 03/22/2023 HPC DRAFT 100 (E)BASEMENT -8' -7" (E) LEVEL 1 FF 0' -0" (E) LEVEL 2 10' -7" (E) ROOF 26' -7" LEVEL 3 28' -10 21/32" NEW BASEMENT -12' -1" LEVEL 2.1 9' -6" 1 2 3 4 5 6 PANTRY 103 MUD 101 REC ROOM 00 MASTER CLOSET 200.1 MASTER BATH 200.3 10'-6"7'-2"9'-0"9'-6"B.O. STRUCT -1' -4" (E) GRADE (E)BASEMENT -8' -7" (E) LEVEL 1 FF 0' -0" (E) LEVEL 2 10' -7" (E) ROOF 26' -7" NEW BASEMENT -12' -1" LEVEL 2.1 9' -6" CDEFGH B A 10'-7"9' - 5 3/4"BEDROOM SUITE 201 CORRIDOR 111 MASTER BED 200 GARAGE 100 MUD 101 KITCHEN 102 DINING 105 LIVING 106 BATH 05.1 MECH 1 08 9'-3"12'-4"REC ROOM 00 BATH 06.1 B.O. STRUCT -1' -4" OPEN (E) GRADE (E) DRIVEWAY TO ALLEY ©2023, RO | ROCKETT DESIGN, INC. DRAWING NUMBER: DRAWING TITLE: PROJECT: NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION OWNER: PROJECT ARCHITECT: RO | ROCKETT DESIGN 1031 W. MANCHESTER BLVD. UNIT 6 INGLEWOOD, CA 90301 TEL: 646.924.9782 CIVIL ENGINEER: ALIENATED MAJESTY, LLC 3111 RICE BOULEVARD HOUSTON, TX 77005 CONTRACTOR: TBD STRUCTURAL ENGINEER: MECHANICAL ENGINEER: PROJECT NUMBER SEAL: All designs, ideas, arrangements and plans indicated by these drawings are the property and copyright of the Architect and shall neither be used on any other work nor be disclosed to any other person for any use whatsoever without written permission. RO|ROCKETT DESIGN and/or its principals and employees waives any and all liability or responsibility for problems that may occur when these plans, drawings, specifications, and/or designs are followed without the designer's guidance with ambiguities, or conflicts which are alleged. KL&A, INC 1717 WASHINGTON AVE GOLDEN, CO 80401 TEL: 303.384.9910 AEC 40801 US HWY 8 AND 24, SUITE 214 EAGLE-VAIL, CO 81620 TEL: 970.748.8520 SGM 118 W SIXTH ST, SUITE 200 GLENWOOD SPRINGS, CO 81601 TEL: 970.384.9081 N3/28/2023 5:54:13 PMA-400 BUILDING SECTIONS 214 W BLEEKER 214 W BLEEKER 214 W BLEEKER STREET ASPEN, CO 81611 APN: 2205 1/4" = 1'-0"1 SECTION / SHORT 1/4" = 1'-0"2 SECTION / LONG NO DATE ISSUE 101 UP HISTORIC SHED OPEN GARAGE 100 (E) F.P. EW EW OFFICE 108 POWDER 107 PANTRY 103 LIVING 106 KITCHEN 102 MUD 101 DINING 105 ENTRY MAIN STAIR 104 0' - 0" EW SIDE SETBACK5' - 0"(E) NEIGHBOR HOUSE, NIC (E) NEIGHBOR HOUSE, NIC PORCH L-11 L-11 RECESSED DOWNLIGHT AT CEILING ABOVE DN L-10 L-10L-10 SAME FIXTURES AT UPPER LEVEL AT THESE LOCATIONS, SEE 1/A-300 L-10 L-10 SETBACK HISTORICL-10 L-10 ©2023, RO | ROCKETT DESIGN, INC. DRAWING NUMBER: DRAWING TITLE: PROJECT: NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION OWNER: PROJECT ARCHITECT: RO | ROCKETT DESIGN 1031 W. MANCHESTER BLVD. UNIT 6 INGLEWOOD, CA 90301 TEL: 646.924.9782 CIVIL ENGINEER: ALIENATED MAJESTY, LLC 3111 RICE BOULEVARD HOUSTON, TX 77005 CONTRACTOR: TBD STRUCTURAL ENGINEER: MECHANICAL ENGINEER: PROJECT NUMBER SEAL: All designs, ideas, arrangements and plans indicated by these drawings are the property and copyright of the Architect and shall neither be used on any other work nor be disclosed to any other person for any use whatsoever without written permission. RO|ROCKETT DESIGN and/or its principals and employees waives any and all liability or responsibility for problems that may occur when these plans, drawings, specifications, and/or designs are followed without the designer's guidance with ambiguities, or conflicts which are alleged. KL&A, INC 1717 WASHINGTON AVE GOLDEN, CO 80401 TEL: 303.384.9910 AEC 40801 US HWY 8 AND 24, SUITE 214 EAGLE-VAIL, CO 81620 TEL: 970.748.8520 SGM 118 W SIXTH ST, SUITE 200 GLENWOOD SPRINGS, CO 81601 TEL: 970.384.9081 N3/28/2023 5:54:14 PMEL-1.0 EXTERIOR ARCH LIGHTING CUTSHEETS 214 W BLEEKER 214 W BLEEKER 214 W BLEEKER STREET ASPEN, CO 81611 APN: 2205 1/8" = 1'-0"1 EXTERIOR ARCHITECTURAL LIGHTING PLAN L-11 LED DOWNLIGHTL-10 BEGA LED WALL SCONCE IN WHITE *FIXTURE TO BE PROVIDED IN WHITE NO DATE ISSUE 0 03/22/2023 HPC DRAFT 102 2282 SFBF -NEW12345678910121312' - 0 1/4"44' - 8"26' - 2 1/2"19' - 10"19' - 9 3/4"11' - 11"3'-2 1/4"5'-6 1/2"141516 1718 19206 1/4"5'-8 3/4"5'-1 1/2"11'-3 1/8"7'-5 1/8"11'-0 1/4"1'-0 3/8"2'-4 1/4"117'-11 1/8"9'-8"1446 SFCONDITIONED460 SFGARAGESTAIR VOID30 SF1546 SFCONDITIONEDSTAIR VOID150 SF(N) BASEMENT110'-9"11'-11"212'-0"33'-2 1/4"411'-3 1/8"944'-7 3/4"(N) BASEMENT1010'-9"128 SF129 SF34 SF121 SF480 SF2'-4 1/4"25SF1126'-2"281 SF1219'-10"(N) BASEMENT13213 SF19'-9 3/4"213 SF145'-6 1/2"60 SF159'-8"(N) BASEMENT1710'-9"104 SF5'-8 3/4"61.5 SF27.75SF3' - 0"9' - 3"3' - 0"9' - 3"3' - 0"9' - 3"B.O. STRUCTUREB.O. STRUCTUREB.O. STRUCTUREB.O. STRUCTURE51'-0 3/8"11 SF67'-5 1/8"80 SF71'-0 3/8"11SF811'-0 1/4"119 SF166 1/4"5.5 SF186 1/4"5.5 SF197'-11 1/8"85 SF205'-1 1/2"55 SF10' - 9"27.75SF27.75SF©2023, RO | ROCKETT DESIGN, INC. DRAWING NUMBER:DRAWING TITLE:PROJECT:NOT FOR CONSTRUCTIONOWNER:PROJECT ARCHITECT:RO | ROCKETTDESIGN1031 W. MANCHESTER BLVD. UNIT 6 INGLEWOOD, CA 90301TEL: 646.924.9782CIVIL ENGINEER:ALIENATED MAJESTY, LLC 3111 RICE BOULEVARDHOUSTON, TX 77005CONTRACTOR:TBDSTRUCTURAL ENGINEER:MECHANICAL ENGINEER:PROJECT NUMBERSEAL:All designs, ideas, arrangements and plans indicated by these drawings are the property and copyright of the Architect and shall neither be used on any other work nor be disclosed to any other person for any use whatsoever without written permission.RO|ROCKETT DESIGN and/or its principals and employees waives any and all liability or responsibility for problems that may occur when these plans, drawings, specifications, and/or designs are followed without the designer's guidance with ambiguities, or conflicts which are alleged.KL&A, INC1717 WASHINGTON AVEGOLDEN, CO 80401TEL: 303.384.9910AEC40801 US HWY 8 AND 24, SUITE 214EAGLE-VAIL, CO 81620TEL: 970.748.8520SGM118 W SIXTH ST, SUITE 200GLENWOOD SPRINGS, CO 81601TEL: 970.384.9081N4/11/2023 11:19:25 AMZ-104PROPOSED AREACALCULATIONS214 W BLEEKER214 W BLEEKER214 W BLEEKER STREETASPEN, CO 81611APN:22051/8" = 1'-0"1FLOOR PLAN / PROPOSED / BASEMENT1/8" = 1'-0"2FLOOR PLAN / PROPOSED / LEVEL 11/8" = 1'-0"3FLOOR PLAN / PROPOSED / LEVEL 21/8" = 1'-0"4SUBGRADE WALL CALCSAREA CALCS / PROPOSED4SCALE: NTSEXPOSED SUBGRADE WALL CALCULATIONSWALLTOTAL WALL EXPOSEDAREA (SF)WALL AREA (SF)1128-234-312927.75 4121-511-680-711-8119-948055.51025-11281-12213-13213-1460-15104-165.5-1761.5-185.5-1985-2055-TOTAL2,222 SF83.25 SF______TOTAL SUBGRADE WALL AREA: 2,222 SFTOTAL EXPOSED WALL AREA: 83.25 SF% OF WALL AREA: 3.75%TOTAL SUBGRADE FAR AREA:3.7% X 2,282 (LOWER GROSS FLOOR AREA)= 85 SFNO DATE ISSUE0 03/22/2023 HPC DRAFT****HISTORIC SHED CALCULATED AS 113 SF WITH 32 SF EXEMPTION**CONTINGENT ON HPC APPROVAL OF FLOOR AREA BONUS.4 ©2023, RO | ROCKETT DESIGN, INC. DRAWING NUMBER: DRAWING TITLE: PROJECT: NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION OWNER: PROJECT ARCHITECT: RO | ROCKETT DESIGN 1031 W. MANCHESTER BLVD. UNIT 6 INGLEWOOD, CA 90301 TEL: 646.924.9782 CIVIL ENGINEER: ALIENATED MAJESTY, LLC 3111 RICE BOULEVARD HOUSTON, TX 77005 CONTRACTOR: TBD STRUCTURAL ENGINEER: MECHANICAL ENGINEER: PROJECT NUMBER SEAL: All designs, ideas, arrangements and plans indicated by these drawings are the property and copyright of the Architect and shall neither be used on any other work nor be disclosed to any other person for any use whatsoever without written permission. RO|ROCKETT DESIGN and/or its principals and employees waives any and all liability or responsibility for problems that may occur when these plans, drawings, specifications, and/or designs are followed without the designer's guidance with ambiguities, or conflicts which are alleged. KL&A, INC 1717 WASHINGTON AVE GOLDEN, CO 80401 TEL: 303.384.9910 AEC 40801 US HWY 8 AND 24, SUITE 214 EAGLE-VAIL, CO 81620 TEL: 970.748.8520 SGM 118 W SIXTH ST, SUITE 200 GLENWOOD SPRINGS, CO 81601 TEL: 970.384.9081 N4/10/2023 4:55:51 PMZ-200 BUILDING MATERIALS 214 W BLEEKER 214 W BLEEKER 214 W BLEEKER STREET ASPEN, CO 81611 APN: 2205 [A]EXISTING WOOD SIDING, PAINTED WHITE[B]WOOD CEDAR SHINGLE ROOFING[C]HISTORIC ASPEN SAND STONE BASE[D]EXISTING BRICK [D] EXISTING BRICK CHIMNEY [B] WOOD CEDAR SHINGLE ROOFING [A] EXISTING WOOD SIDING, WHITE [C] HISTORIC ASPEN SAND STONE BASE EXTERIOR MATERIALS1 SCALE: NTS NO DATE ISSUE 66' - 7 3/4"213PROPOSED WINDOW B L E E K E R S T R E E T©2023, RO | ROCKETT DESIGN, INC. DRAWING NUMBER: DRAWING TITLE: PROJECT: NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION OWNER: PROJECT ARCHITECT: RO | ROCKETT DESIGN 1031 W. MANCHESTER BLVD. UNIT 6 INGLEWOOD, CA 90301 TEL: 646.924.9782 CIVIL ENGINEER: ALIENATED MAJESTY, LLC 3111 RICE BOULEVARD HOUSTON, TX 77005 CONTRACTOR: TBD STRUCTURAL ENGINEER: MECHANICAL ENGINEER: PROJECT NUMBER SEAL: All designs, ideas, arrangements and plans indicated by these drawings are the property and copyright of the Architect and shall neither be used on any other work nor be disclosed to any other person for any use whatsoever without written permission. RO|ROCKETT DESIGN and/or its principals and employees waives any and all liability or responsibility for problems that may occur when these plans, drawings, specifications, and/or designs are followed without the designer's guidance with ambiguities, or conflicts which are alleged. KL&A, INC 1717 WASHINGTON AVE GOLDEN, CO 80401 TEL: 303.384.9910 AEC 40801 US HWY 8 AND 24, SUITE 214 EAGLE-VAIL, CO 81620 TEL: 970.748.8520 SGM 118 W SIXTH ST, SUITE 200 GLENWOOD SPRINGS, CO 81601 TEL: 970.384.9081 N4/10/2023 4:55:53 PMZ-301 WINDOW 213 DIAGRAM 214 W BLEEKER 214 W BLEEKER 214 W BLEEKER STREET ASPEN, CO 81611 APN: 2205 NO DATE ISSUE 1/8" = 1'-0"1 FLOOR PLAN / LEVEL 1 WINDOW 213 VIEW FROM STREET2 SCALE: NTS E N EXISTING TREE TYPE NEW TREE SITE PLAN LEGEND B L E E K E R S T R E E TSL 12" / 12"SL 12" / 12"SL 18" / 12"SL 18" / 12"SL 8 1/2" / 12"SL 12" / 12"SL 12" / 12"SL 3" / 12"SL 12" / 12"SL 16" / 12"SL 8 1/2" / 12"SL 12" / 12"SL 12" / 12"SL 12" / 12"SL 16" / 12"SL 16" / 12"SL 16" / 12" SL 16" / 12"SL 16" / 12"SL 16" / 12"SL 16" / 12" EW EW EW (E) HISTORICAL SHED 3 1/2" / 12" (N)(N)(N) (N) (N) ASPEN TREES NEW ASPEN TREE (N) SKYLIGHT, SEE SCHED 6' TALL PTD (N) WD FENCE (N) SAND SET STONE PAVER WALKWAY (N) SKYLIGHT, SEE SCHED SETBACK LINESETBACK LINE SOUTHEAST HISTORIC(E) NEIGHBOR HOUSE, NIC (E) NEIGHBOR HOUSE, NIC (N) EXT STN PAVERS (E) LAWN TO REMAIN FRONT SETBACK 10'-0" REAR SETBACK 10'-0"SIDE SETBACK10' - 0"SIDE SETBACK5' - 0"PROPOSED LOCATION OF HISTORIC SHED (E) LOCATION OF HISTORIC SHED ©2023, RO | ROCKETT DESIGN, INC. DRAWING NUMBER: DRAWING TITLE: PROJECT: NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION OWNER: PROJECT ARCHITECT: RO | ROCKETT DESIGN 1031 W. MANCHESTER BLVD. UNIT 6 INGLEWOOD, CA 90301 TEL: 646.924.9782 CIVIL ENGINEER: ALIENATED MAJESTY, LLC 3111 RICE BOULEVARD HOUSTON, TX 77005 CONTRACTOR: TBD STRUCTURAL ENGINEER: MECHANICAL ENGINEER: PROJECT NUMBER SEAL: All designs, ideas, arrangements and plans indicated by these drawings are the property and copyright of the Architect and shall neither be used on any other work nor be disclosed to any other person for any use whatsoever without written permission. RO|ROCKETT DESIGN and/or its principals and employees waives any and all liability or responsibility for problems that may occur when these plans, drawings, specifications, and/or designs are followed without the designer's guidance with ambiguities, or conflicts which are alleged. KL&A, INC 1717 WASHINGTON AVE GOLDEN, CO 80401 TEL: 303.384.9910 AEC 40801 US HWY 8 AND 24, SUITE 214 EAGLE-VAIL, CO 81620 TEL: 970.748.8520 SGM 118 W SIXTH ST, SUITE 200 GLENWOOD SPRINGS, CO 81601 TEL: 970.384.9081 N4/10/2023 4:54:49 PMA-100 SITE PLAN 214 W BLEEKER 214 W BLEEKER 214 W BLEEKER STREET ASPEN, CO 81611 APN: 2205 1/4" = 1'-0"1 SITE PLAN NO DATE ISSUE 0 03/22/2023 HPC DRAFT PROTECT AND STABILIZE WITH NEW CONC PAD, AS REQ'D NOTE: STORM WATER MANAGMENT CURRENTLY BEING ENGINEERED SHOULD A SUB-GRADE WATER RETENTION SYSTEM BE REQUIRED, SOD-LID WILL BE INSTALLED. SYSTEM TO BE INSTALLED AS FAR AWAY FROM HISTORIC ASSET AS POSSIBLE UPA-300A-3011A-3012A-30012HISTORICSHEDOPEN76'-4"CCDDEEFFGGHHBB112233445566AAGARAGE100(E) F.P.BENCH12'-3 1/4"EWREF76'-4"SETBACK LINESETBACK LINEEWOFFICE108POWDER107PANTRY103LIVING106KITCHEN102MUD101DINING105107ENTRY(E)103(E)105(E)106(E)105(E)101102(E)112100(E)100(E)107(E)111(E)109(E)106(E)110101(E)108111114(E)1121130' - 0"[STN-10]SL[CONC-2]HP: 8' - 1"LP: 7' - 8"SOUTHEAST3'-5" 10'-11 3/8" 11'-0 1/8" 6'-7 3/4" 6'-2 1/4"20'-10 1/2" 6'-4 5/8" 15'-9 1/2" 3'-10 1/2"HISTORIC29'-0 1/2"MAIN STAIR1040' - 0"[STN-10]2A-4002A-4004'-6" 4'-3"0' - 0"0' - 0"1A-4001A-400EW110COATSSIDE SETBACK5' - 0"16' - 8 1/2"8' - 0 3/4"13' - 0"6' - 7 3/4"(N)(N) ASPEN TREESHISTORIC(E) NEIGHBOR HOUSE, NIC(E) NEIGHBOR HOUSE, NICFRONT SETBACK10' - 0"SIDE SETBACK10' - 0"SIDE SETBACK5' - 0"(EH)(EH)(EH)(N) SAND SET STONE PAVER WALKWAY6' TALL PTD (N) WD FENCE6' TALL PTD (N) WD FENCEA-8021REFA-8003P01124FRONT SETBACK10'-0"REAR SETBACK10'-0"(E)104120PROPOSED LOCATION OF HISTORIC SHED.PROTECT AND STABILIZE WITH NEW CONC PAD AS REQ'D6'-8"(E) LOCATION OF HISTORIC SHED3'-0"8'-8"92'-6"4"37'-3"©2023, RO | ROCKETT DESIGN, INC. DRAWING NUMBER:DRAWING TITLE:PROJECT:NOT FOR CONSTRUCTIONOWNER:PROJECT ARCHITECT:RO | ROCKETTDESIGN1031 W. MANCHESTER BLVD. UNIT 6 INGLEWOOD, CA 90301TEL: 646.924.9782CIVIL ENGINEER:ALIENATED MAJESTY, LLC 3111 RICE BOULEVARDHOUSTON, TX 77005CONTRACTOR:TBDSTRUCTURAL ENGINEER:MECHANICAL ENGINEER:PROJECT NUMBERSEAL:All designs, ideas, arrangements and plans indicated by these drawings are the property and copyright of the Architect and shall neither be used on any other work nor be disclosed to any other person for any use whatsoever without written permission.RO|ROCKETT DESIGN and/or its principals and employees waives any and all liability or responsibility for problems that may occur when these plans, drawings, specifications, and/or designs are followed without the designer's guidance with ambiguities, or conflicts which are alleged.KL&A, INC1717 WASHINGTON AVEGOLDEN, CO 80401TEL: 303.384.9910AEC40801 US HWY 8 AND 24, SUITE 214EAGLE-VAIL, CO 81620TEL: 970.748.8520SGM118 W SIXTH ST, SUITE 200GLENWOOD SPRINGS, CO 81601TEL: 970.384.9081N4/11/2023 11:35:09 AMA-102FLOOR PLAN / LEVEL 1214 W BLEEKER214 W BLEEKER214 W BLEEKER STREETASPEN, CO 81611APN:22051/4" = 1'-0"1FLOOR PLAN / PROPOSED / LEVEL 1NO DATE ISSUE0 03/22/2023 HPC DRAFT ROOF PLAN NOTES: 1. SEE LANDSCAPE PLAN FOR (E) AND (N) TREE LOCATIONS. 2. SEE CIVIL DRAWINGS FOR DRIVEWAY LAYOUT, PROFILE & SITE DRAINAGE INFORMATION. 3. ALL GUTTERS TO BE NON-COMBUSTIBLE MATERIAL. 4. ALL GUTTERS TO HAVE HEAT-TRACE SYSTEM AND APPROVED SCREEN TO MITIGATE DEBRIS ACCUMULATION. 5. GC TO COORDINATE SNOW FENCE INSTALLATION WITH MFR AND ARCHITECT, COLOR TO MATCH ROOFING. 6. ALL ROOFING TO BE CLASS 'A' W/ ROOF EDGES/GAPS FIRESTOPPED + 26 GA VALLEY FLASHING AS REQD, EAVES:1-HR FRC, IR1 MATERIAL, FASCIA:1-HR FRC, IR MATERIAL, OR 1" NOMINAL DIMENSION LUMBER. 7. VENTS:<144 IN2, <1/4" NON-COMBUSTIBLE CORROSION RESISTANT MESH OR APPROVED DEVICE 8. ALL VENTS AND FLUES TO BE LOCATED AWAY FROM STREET SIDE A-300 A-3011A-301 2 A-300 1 2 C C D D E E F F G G H H B B 11 22 33 44 55 66 A A (E) DNDN DNDN DNDN DNDNDNDN DNDNDNDN DNDN DNDNDNDN(E) (N)SETBACK LINESETBACK LINE (N) (N) (N) (N) (N) DN DNDN301 300 306 303 304 SOUTHEAST 3'-5"10'-11 3/8"11'-0 1/8"6'-7 3/4"6'-2 1/4"20'-10 1/2"6'-4 5/8"15'-9 1/2"3'-10 1/2" HISTORIC 29'-0 1/2" 2 A-400 2 A-400 1 A-400 1 A-400 HISTORIC(EH)302 (N) (N) (EH)305 (E) BRICK CHIMNEY TO BE REINSTALLED AFTER HISTORIC ASSET IS REINSTALLEDSIDE SETBACK10' - 0"SIDE SETBACK5' - 0"(N) SKYLIGHT, SEE SCHED (E) NEIGHBOR HOUSE, NIC (E) NEIGHBOR HOUSE, NIC (N) 6' TALL PTD WD FENCE (N) WD DOOR AT FENCE (N) WD DOOR AT FENCE (N) SKYLIGHT, SEE SCHED (N) SKYLIGHT, SEE SCHED PLUMBING VENTS PLUMBING VENTS SNOW STOPS AT ALL LOCATIONS ABOVE WALKWAYS, STAIRS, DECKS AND UTILITIES TYP PER LOCAL ORDINANCE R903.6 1 2 4 FRONT SETBACK 10'-0" REAR SETBACK 10'-0" PROPOSED LOCATION OF HISTORIC SHED (E) LOCATION OF HISTORIC SHED ROOF VENTS AND FLUES TO BE LOCATED BEYOND DASHED LINEROOF VENTS AND FLUES TO BE LOCATED BEYOND DASHED LINE©2023, RO | ROCKETT DESIGN, INC. DRAWING NUMBER: DRAWING TITLE: PROJECT: NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION OWNER: PROJECT ARCHITECT: RO | ROCKETT DESIGN 1031 W. MANCHESTER BLVD. UNIT 6 INGLEWOOD, CA 90301 TEL: 646.924.9782 CIVIL ENGINEER: ALIENATED MAJESTY, LLC 3111 RICE BOULEVARD HOUSTON, TX 77005 CONTRACTOR: TBD STRUCTURAL ENGINEER: MECHANICAL ENGINEER: PROJECT NUMBER SEAL: All designs, ideas, arrangements and plans indicated by these drawings are the property and copyright of the Architect and shall neither be used on any other work nor be disclosed to any other person for any use whatsoever without written permission. RO|ROCKETT DESIGN and/or its principals and employees waives any and all liability or responsibility for problems that may occur when these plans, drawings, specifications, and/or designs are followed without the designer's guidance with ambiguities, or conflicts which are alleged. KL&A, INC 1717 WASHINGTON AVE GOLDEN, CO 80401 TEL: 303.384.9910 AEC 40801 US HWY 8 AND 24, SUITE 214 EAGLE-VAIL, CO 81620 TEL: 970.748.8520 SGM 118 W SIXTH ST, SUITE 200 GLENWOOD SPRINGS, CO 81601 TEL: 970.384.9081 N4/10/2023 4:54:54 PMA-104 FLOOR PLAN / ROOF 214 W BLEEKER 214 W BLEEKER 214 W BLEEKER STREET ASPEN, CO 81611 APN: 2205 1/4" = 1'-0"1 FLOOR PLAN / PROPOSED / ROOF NO DATE ISSUE 0 03/22/2023 HPC DRAFT (E)BASEMENT -8' -7" (E) LEVEL 1 FF 0' -0" (E) LEVEL 2 10' -7" (E) ROOF 26' -7" NEW BASEMENT -12' -1" C D E F G HBA PROPOSED EGRESS WELL PROPOSED BASEMENT FOOTPRINT (E) HISTORIC SHED 105 (E)106 (E)105 (E)112 (E)111 (E)109 106 (E)110 (E)208(E)209 (E)212 (EH)101 (E)108 301 001E HISTORIC 29' - 0 1/2" 20'-10 1/2"6'-4 5/8"15'-9 1/2"3'-10 1/2"14'-0 1/2"13'-1"1'-11" 223 200 222 2' - 6"[L10][L10] [L10][L10] NEW WINDOW, SEE SCHED SETBACK LINE(N) CLASS A CEDAR SHINGLE ROOF (N) CLASS A CEDAR SHINGLE ROOF (E) WOOD SIDING TO BE REPLACED AS NEEDED. NEW PAINT AT ALL (E) WOOD SIDING TO BE REPLACED AS NEEDED. NEW PAINT AT ALL (N) SANDSTONE BASE 1' - 6"[L10] REFINISH (E) HISTORIC PORCH & FRONT DOOR T.O. (E)ROOF PITCH 26' -11" T.O. (E)ROOF PITCH 21' -9" (E) ROOF EAVE 18' -9 1/4" 12" 12"HISTORIC ASSETNON-HISTORICHISTORIC ASSETNON-HISTORIC(N) WOOD LATTICE BASE REMOVE (E) FISH SCALE SIDING AT ALL NON-HISTORIC AREAS AND REPLACE WITH HORIZONTAL SIDING, TYP (E)BASEMENT -8' -7" (E) LEVEL 1 FF 0' -0" (E) LEVEL 2 10' -7" (E) ROOF 26' -7" NEW BASEMENT -12' -1" CDEFGH B A HISTORIC 29' - 0 1/2"20'-10 1/2"6'-4 5/8"15'-9 1/2"3'-10 1/2" (E) HISTORIC SHED PROPOSED BASEMENT FOOTPRINT PROPOSED BASEMENT FOOTPRINT PROPOSED EGRESS WELL (N) CLASS A CEDAR SHINGLE ROOF (E)101 (E)205 (E)204 (E)203A (E)201 (E)301 003E 002E SETBACK LINESETBACK LINE[L10] (N) CLASS A CEDAR SHINGLE ROOF (E) WOOD SIDING TO BE REPLACED AS NEEDED. NEW PAINT AT ALL (E) WOOD SIDING TO BE REPLACED AS NEEDED. NEW PAINT AT ALL (E) BRICK CHIMNEY TO BE REINSTALLED AFTER HISTORIC ASSET IS REINSTALLED 1' - 6"2' - 6"[L10] T.O. (E)ROOF PITCH 24' -0" 12" 18" (E) ROOF EAVE 11' -11 3/4" (E) ROOF HEIGHT 15' -11 3/4" 120 HISTORIC ASSETNON-HISTORICHISTORIC ASSETNON-HISTORIC(N) SANDSTONE BASE REMOVE (E) FISH SCALE SIDING AT ALL NON-HISTORIC AREAS AND REPLACE WITH HORIZONTAL SIDING, TYP 1/4" = 1'-0"1 ELEVATION / PROPOSED / EAST ©2023, RO | ROCKETT DESIGN, INC. DRAWING NUMBER: DRAWING TITLE: PROJECT: NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION OWNER: PROJECT ARCHITECT: RO | ROCKETT DESIGN 1031 W. MANCHESTER BLVD. UNIT 6 INGLEWOOD, CA 90301 TEL: 646.924.9782 CIVIL ENGINEER: ALIENATED MAJESTY, LLC 3111 RICE BOULEVARD HOUSTON, TX 77005 CONTRACTOR: TBD STRUCTURAL ENGINEER: MECHANICAL ENGINEER: PROJECT NUMBER SEAL: All designs, ideas, arrangements and plans indicated by these drawings are the property and copyright of the Architect and shall neither be used on any other work nor be disclosed to any other person for any use whatsoever without written permission. RO|ROCKETT DESIGN and/or its principals and employees waives any and all liability or responsibility for problems that may occur when these plans, drawings, specifications, and/or designs are followed without the designer's guidance with ambiguities, or conflicts which are alleged. KL&A, INC 1717 WASHINGTON AVE GOLDEN, CO 80401 TEL: 303.384.9910 AEC 40801 US HWY 8 AND 24, SUITE 214 EAGLE-VAIL, CO 81620 TEL: 970.748.8520 SGM 118 W SIXTH ST, SUITE 200 GLENWOOD SPRINGS, CO 81601 TEL: 970.384.9081 N4/10/2023 4:55:10 PMA-300 EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS 214 W BLEEKER 214 W BLEEKER 214 W BLEEKER STREET ASPEN, CO 81611 APN: 2205 1/4" = 1'-0"2 ELEVATION / PROPOSED / WEST NO DATE ISSUE 0 03/22/2023 HPC DRAFT (E)BASEMENT -8' -7" (E) LEVEL 1 FF 0' -0" (E) LEVEL 2 10' -7" (E) ROOF 26' -7" NEW BASEMENT -12' -1" 123456 SKYLIGHT, SEE SCHED (E) HISTORIC SHED, DASHED FOR CLARITY PTD MTL 'K'-STYLE GUTTER AND DOWNSPOUT; REPLACE (E) GUTTER / DOWNSPOUT WHERE NEEDED; ADD (N) GUTTER TO MATCH (E) WHERE REQ'D 6'-2 1/4"6'-7 3/4"11'-0 1/8"10'-11 3/8"3'-5" FOOTPRINT OF (N) BASEMENT WOOD GUARDRAIL AND DECK TO MATCH EXISTING, REPAIR AS NEEDED (N) CLASS A CEDAR SHINGLE ROOF (E)103 (E)107 (E)207 (E)206 107 306 [L10][L10] NEW WINDOW, SEE SCHED (N) CLASS A CEDAR SHINGLE ROOF (E) WOOD SIDING TO BE REPLACED AS NEEDED. NEW PAINT AT ALL (N) PAINTED WHITE WOOD FENCE, SLD (N) PAINTED WHITE WOOD FENCE, SLD. NOT SHOWN FOR CLARITY 302 12" 12" T.O. (E) ROOF PITCH 28' -5 1/2" (E) EAVE POINT 17' -2" (E) ROOF HEIGHT 20' -11 1/4" (E)104 REMOVE (E) FISH SCALE SIDING AT ALL NON-HISTORIC AREAS AND REPLACE WITH HORIZONTAL SIDING, TYP (E)BASEMENT -8' -7" (E) LEVEL 1 FF 0' -0" (E) LEVEL 2 10' -7" (E) ROOF 26' -7" NEW BASEMENT -12' -1" 1 2 3 4 5 6 3'-5"10'-11 3/8"11'-0 1/8"6'-7 3/4"6'-2 1/4"26'-7"FOOTPRINT OF (N) BASEMENT SKYLIGHT, SEE SCHED (EH)102 (EH)100 (E)100 (E)200 213 NEW WINDOW, SEE SCHED (N) CLASS A CEDAR SHINGLE ROOF (N) CLASS A CEDAR SHINGLE ROOF (E) WOOD SIDING TO BE REPLACED AS NEEDED. NEW PAINT AT ALL (E) WOOD SIDING TO BE REPLACED AS NEEDED. NEW PAINT AT ALL 42" TALL (N) PAINTED WHITE WOOD FENCE, SLD. NOT SHOWN FOR CLARITY (N) PAINTED WHITE WOOD FENCE 305 303 REFINISH (E) HISTORIC PORCH & FRONT DOOR SKYLIGHT, SEE SCHED (E) BRICK CHIMNEY TO BE REINSTALLED AFTER HISTORIC ASSET IS REINSTALLED T.O. (E)ROOF PITCH 24' -8 1/2" 12" 12" (E)ROOF EAVE 12' -4 1/4" (E)ROOF HEIGHT 16' -5 3/4" (N) WOOD LATTICE BASE (N) SANDSTONE BASE ©2023, RO | ROCKETT DESIGN, INC. DRAWING NUMBER: DRAWING TITLE: PROJECT: NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION OWNER: PROJECT ARCHITECT: RO | ROCKETT DESIGN 1031 W. MANCHESTER BLVD. UNIT 6 INGLEWOOD, CA 90301 TEL: 646.924.9782 CIVIL ENGINEER: ALIENATED MAJESTY, LLC 3111 RICE BOULEVARD HOUSTON, TX 77005 CONTRACTOR: TBD STRUCTURAL ENGINEER: MECHANICAL ENGINEER: PROJECT NUMBER SEAL: All designs, ideas, arrangements and plans indicated by these drawings are the property and copyright of the Architect and shall neither be used on any other work nor be disclosed to any other person for any use whatsoever without written permission. RO|ROCKETT DESIGN and/or its principals and employees waives any and all liability or responsibility for problems that may occur when these plans, drawings, specifications, and/or designs are followed without the designer's guidance with ambiguities, or conflicts which are alleged. KL&A, INC 1717 WASHINGTON AVE GOLDEN, CO 80401 TEL: 303.384.9910 AEC 40801 US HWY 8 AND 24, SUITE 214 EAGLE-VAIL, CO 81620 TEL: 970.748.8520 SGM 118 W SIXTH ST, SUITE 200 GLENWOOD SPRINGS, CO 81601 TEL: 970.384.9081 N4/10/2023 4:55:25 PMA-301 EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS 214 W BLEEKER 214 W BLEEKER 214 W BLEEKER STREET ASPEN, CO 81611 APN: 2205 1/4" = 1'-0"2 ELEVATION / PROPOSED / NORTH 1/4" = 1'-0"1 ELEVATION / PROPOSED / SOUTH NO DATE ISSUE 0 03/22/2023 HPC DRAFT Page 1 of 4 130 South Galena Street Aspen, CO 81611-1975 | P: 970.920.5197 | cityofaspen.com MEMORANDUM TO: Aspen Historic Preservation Commission FROM: Amy Simon, Planning Director MEETING DATE: April 12, 2023 RE: 312 W. Hyman Avenue –Substantial Amendment to Major Development, PUBLIC HEARING APPLICANT /OWNER: POWDERDAYSKIING LLC REPRESENTATIVE: Jeffrey Woodruff, Cloud Hill Design LLC LOCATION: Street Address: 312 W. Hyman Avenue Legal Description: Lots P and Q, Block 46, City and Townsite of Aspen, Colorado Parcel Identification Number: PID #2735-124-64-006 CURRENT ZONING & USE: R-6, Medium Density Residential; Single-family home PROPOSED ZONING & LAND USE: No change SUMMARY: 312 W. Hyman Avenue is a landmark designated 6,000 square foot lot that contains a 1956 Chalet style home, relatively unaltered from its original construction. In 2022, HPC reviewed and approved Major Development and Setback Variations for an addition on the north and east sides of the home, a new detached garage, and site changes. As the applicant prepared for building permit review it became apparent that last minute miscommunication with previous staff had caused some information the architect intended to be part of Final HPC review to be left out of the memo and packet. This Substantial Amendment review is to address information the board has not reviewed previously, and to address some of the outstanding conditions of approval. The architect also asks to revise the previously granted location for the new garage. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends approval for the Amendments, with the exception of an upper floor balcony, with conditions. 103 Page 2 of 4 130 South Galena Street Aspen, CO 81611-1975 | P: 970.920.5197 | cityofaspen.com BACKGROUND: 312 West Hyman is a designated AspenModern landmark located on a 6,000 square foot lot in the R-6 zone district. The house is a classic Chalet style building, completed in 1956 and locally designated in 2006. The historic orientation of the structure is not square to the property lines but is angled to face Aspen Mountain. The site includes several large pine and spruce trees of note surrounding this property. Julius Herman Birlauf, a Swiss-born immigrant, assisted his daughter, Genevieve Birlauf Leininger, with the construction that was inspired by both Swiss and Bavarian architectural styles found in small mountain towns of the Alps. Archives include an extensive family photo collection of the phases of construction, interiors, and family gatherings on the front porch. Family letters describe influences for construction, and the network of family and friends in Aspen while located at the house, underlining the house and family as important components of the heritage of Aspen. The original home is an excellent example of Chalet style architecture associated with early ski areas and mountain tourist locations around the world. Common architectural features include a simple, low pitched roof with large overhangs, a rectangular footprint, small horizontal windows, and a large balcony that runs along the length of the façade. The first floor has less detail and a white stucco finish. The main living area is on the second floor. Examples of the style in Aspen often added large picture window(s) in limited locations, a variation from the traditions found in the Alps. The exterior of a Chalet style building typically features decorative shutters, fascia, and porch railings in the shape of hearts or edelweiss motifs, which can be found at 312 W. Hyman. Fig 1: Historic image of 312 W. Hyman. This image is one phase after the period of original construction, with the first remodel. Alterations include the addition of small windows on the East elevation at the first floor, a character defining feature. c 1958. Fig.2: Recent image of 312 W. Hyman When a past owner of 312 W. Hyman proposed demolition of important property approximately 20 years ago, it was purchased by the City of Aspen and designated historic to protect a culturally significant resource. After many years of the house serving the residential needs of City employees, it was sold to the current owner. 104 Page 3 of 4 130 South Galena Street Aspen, CO 81611-1975 | P: 970.920.5197 | cityofaspen.com REQUEST OF HPC: The Applicant is requesting the following land use approvals: • Substantial Amendment to Major Development (Section 415.070.E.2) to adjust the approval granted at HPC Final Review. • Setback Variations (Section 26.415.110.C) to shift the new garage placement to the west. The HPC is the final review authority. This review is not subject to Call-up Notice by City Council. STAFF COMMENTS AND RECOMMENDATION: Please see Exhibits A and B for staff findings on the review. A summary of the approved scope of work is: • A two-story addition on the north side of the historic structure, and a one-story addition at the northeast corner, with a deck above it. New fenestration in the areas of the addition. • New sliding glass doors filling in the historic garage openings, with the garage doors modified to become folding shutters. • An enlarged entry on the west side of the home. • A small window where an attic vent is located on the south façade. This window is to bring additional light inside when the dropped ceiling is removed. • New flush-mounted skylights • Refurbishment of the existing chimney. • Construction of a new detached single car garage at the northwest corner of the site. • Site improvements including walkways, patios, new landscaping and a hot tub. The approved development is well below the maximum allowed floor area. The aspects of the project that are being brought forward for review as a Substantial Amendment are demolition of two historic wall segments and reduction in the depth of a new balcony previously approved by HPC at the northeast corner of the home, modifying the historic windows to replace the existing glass with insulated glass, and landscape and site design changes related to the front driveway, heat pumps along the east side of the house and the garage location. The packet is comprehensive and describes the full project, however staff suggests HPC focus on review of sheets H1 through H8, comparisons of the existing conditions, the July 27th Final approval, and the proposed amendments; and the A 101 sheets depicting the driveway options and the location of the request to move the new garage to 3’ from the west property line, abutting a tall retaining wall. Please note that the proposed relocation of the garage is not drawn yet in the interest of securing HPC approval before updating the full plan set. Regarding the front driveway, as the project moves closer to construction, a solution to the fact that the existing driveway crosses a corner of the neighbor’s property is rising in importance. This is a long- standing condition that may be an easement of sorts by this time, but it is unclear whether the encroachment can or should continue. Although a garage is proposed at the rear of the property, the front driveway and garage are part of the historic design of the home and are character defining. The packet includes clarification of how the driveway might be maintained at its current width, but softened with new landscape and defined car tracks. The packet also contains alternatives to neck down the driveway 105 Page 4 of 4 130 South Galena Street Aspen, CO 81611-1975 | P: 970.920.5197 | cityofaspen.com entrance to avoid the neighbor’s land. HPC is asked to provide a decision as to which alternative plans if any are appropriate if the encroachment must cease. Staff can support necking down the driveway and suggests that the final design be resolved with staff and monitor as a condition of approval. Staff recommends that staff and monitor also continue to review the landscape plan. To meet the design guidelines, there should be a reduction in the shrubs in front of the historic resource shown on L.2.001. The foreground of the resource should be simplified, with the least visual obstruction of the historic resource and impact on the large blue spruce possible. Samples of all paving materials must be provided for review and approval. Staff will continue to work with the architect to ensure other aspects of HPC’s final approval, such as a clear depiction of the maintenance edge that must surround the resource are provided. Some structural details will also be an on-going discussion to ensure that no historic exterior materials are inappropriately impacted. The plan set provided for this Amendment is successful and cleans up a number of previous concerns and conditions by minimizing the visibility of the new skylights on the roof, clarifying plans for snow retention and gutters, and simplifying fenestration on the rear of the addition. The one proposal that staff cannot support, discussed at some length in Exhibit A, is a request to demolish two historic sections of wall to increase living space and reduce an approved balcony on the east side of the resource. The change is shown at right in comparisons of the second floor plan from Final approval and this Amendment. Given the fact that this project will demolish most of the rear façade of the home for the addition, staff cannot support removal of more historic fabric. With that exception, staff recommends that the Substantial Amendment and Setback Variation requests be approved as described in the attached resolution. ATTACHMENTS: Resolution #__, Series of 2023 Exhibit A – Historic Preservation Design Guidelines /Staff Findings Exhibit B – Application Exhibit C – Application 106 HPC Resolution #__, Series of 2023 Page 1 of 2 RESOLUTION #__, SERIES OF 2023 A RESOLUTION OF THE ASPEN HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION GRANTING A SUBSTANTIAL AMENDMENT TO MAJOR DEVELOPMENT APPROVAL AND SETBACK VARIATIONS FOR THE PROPERTY LOCATED AT 312 W. HYMAN AVENUE, LOTS P AND Q, BLOCK 46, CITY AND TOWNSITE OF ASPEN, COLORADO PARCEL ID: 2735-124-64-006 WHEREAS, the applicant, POWDERDAYSKIING LLC, represented by Jeffrey Woodruff of Cloud Hill Design LLC, has requested HPC approval for a Substantial Amendment to Major Development and Setback Variations for the property located at 312 W Hyman, Lots P and Q, Block 46, City and Townsite of Aspen, Colorado; and WHEREAS, the approvals to be amended were granted through HPC Resolutions #6 and #11, Series of 2022, and the project remains in its period of Vested Rights secured by Final Major Development on July 27, 2022; and WHEREAS, HPC is to review the Substantial Amendment and Setback Variations application, the staff analysis report and the evidence presented at the hearing to determine the project's conformance with the City Historic Preservation Design Guidelines. The HPC may approve, disapprove, approve with conditions or continue the application to obtain additional information necessary to make a decision to approve or deny; and WHEREAS, Community Development Department staff reviewed the application for compliance with applicable review standards and recommended partial approval of the application, with conditions; and WHEREAS, HPC reviewed the project on April 12, 2023, considered the application, the staff memo and public comments, and granted partial approval of the application, with conditions, by a vote of __ to __. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED: Section 1: Approvals The Substantial Amendment and Setback Variations are approved as represented in the application reviewed by HPC on April 12, 2023, with the exception of the amendments to the balcony area on the northeast upper corner of the historic resource, which are denied. Conditions of approval are: 1. Staff and monitor will review and approve the final driveway design, aiming to represent two parking spaces on-site. Only one must be truly usable to meet parking requirements. 2. Staff and monitor will review and approve the final landscape plan as it pertains to the foreground of the historic resource to balance privacy concerns with an appropriate level of simplicity, and to limit blocking public views of the Chalet or detracting from the blue spruce tree. 107 HPC Resolution #__, Series of 2023 Page 2 of 2 3. Staff will continue to work with the architect to ensure a clear depiction of the maintenance edge that must surround the resource is included in the landscape plan. Some structural details will also continue to be resolved to ensure that no historic exterior materials are impacted without HPC approval. 4. HPC hereby grants a 3’ west sideyard setback for the garage, a 5’4” combined sideyard, and a 2.4’ east sideyard to acknowledge the existing location of the historic resource 5. All conditions of HPC Resolutions #6 and #11, Series of 2022 have been resolved, except that assurance must still be provided that the skylights shall have sufficient shading to eliminate light pollution to other neighboring properties, and the building permit must include a detailed Preservation Plan labelling existing historic materials on the areas of the building not approved for alteration, and the intent to repair and retain them. Section 2: Material Representations All material representations and commitments made by the Applicant pursuant to the development proposal approvals as herein awarded, whether in public hearing or documentation presented before the Community Development Department, the Historic Preservation Commission, or the Aspen City Council are hereby incorporated in such plan development approvals and the same shall be complied with as if fully set forth herein, unless amended by other specific conditions or an authorized authority. Section 3: Existing Litigation This Resolution shall not affect any existing litigation and shall not operate as an abatement of any action or proceeding now pending under or by virtue of the ordinances repealed or amended as herein provided, and the same shall be conducted and concluded under such prior ordinances. Section 4: Severability If any section, subsection, sentence, clause, phrase, or portion of this Resolution is for any reason held invalid or unconstitutional in a court of competent jurisdiction, such portion shall be deemed a separate, distinct and independent provision and shall not affect the validity of the remaining portions thereof. APPROVED BY THE COMMISSION at its regular meeting on the 12th day of April, 2023. Approved as to Form: Approved as to Content: _________________ __________________________________ Katharine Johnson, Assistant City Attorney Kara Thompson, HPC Chair ATTEST: _____________________________ Mike Sear, Deputy City Clerk 108 Page 1 of 6 Exhibit A Historic Preservation Design Guidelines Staff Findings 26.415.070.E.2. Substantial amendments. a) All changes to approved plans that materially modify the location, size, shape, materials, design, detailing or appearance of the building elements as originally depicted must be approved by the HPC as a substantial amendment. e) Staff shall review the submittal material and prepare a report that analyzes the extent of the changes relative to the approved plans and how the proposed revisions affect the project's conformance with the design guidelines and other applicable Land Use Codes. This report will be transmitted to the HPC with relevant information on the proposed revisions and a recommendation to continue, approve, disapprove or approve with conditions and the reasons for the recommendation. f) The HPC will review the application, the staff analysis report and the evidence presented at the hearing to determine the project's conformance with the City Historic Preservation Design Guidelines. The HPC may approve, disapprove, approve with conditions or continue the application to obtain additional information necessary to make a decision to approve or deny. Relevant Historic Preservation Design Guidelines for Conceptual Review of this application (PLEASE NOTE THAT GUIDELINES WHICH STAFF FINDS ARE NOT MET OR REQUIRE STUDY ARE HIGHLIGHTED): 1.4 Design a new driveway or improve an existing driveway in a manner that minimizes its visual impact. • If an alley exists at the site, the new driveway must be located off it. • Tracks, gravel, light grey concrete with minimal seams, or similar materials are appropriate for driveways on Aspen Victorian properties. 1.5 Maintain the historic hierarchy of spaces. • Reflect the established progression of public to private spaces from the public sidewalk to a semi-public walkway, to a semi private entry feature, to private spaces. 1.6 Provide a simple walkway running perpendicular from the street to the front entry on residential projects. • Meandering walkways are not allowed, except where it is needed to avoid a tree or is typical of the period of significance. • Use paving materials that are similar to those used historically for the building style and install them in the manner that they would have been used historically. For example on an Aspen Victorian landmark set flagstone pavers in sand, rather than in concrete. Light 109 Page 2 of 6 grey concrete, brick or red sandstone are appropriate private walkway materials for most landmarks. • The width of a new entry sidewalk should generally be three feet or less for residential properties. A wider sidewalk may be appropriate for an AspenModern property. 1.7 Provide positive open space within a project site. • Ensure that open space on site is meaningful and consolidated into a few large spaces rather than many small unusable areas. • Open space should be designed to support and complement the historic building. 1.9 Landscape development on AspenModern landmarks shall be addressed on a case by case basis. 1.12 Provide an appropriate context for historic structures. See diagram. • Simplicity and restraint are required. Do not overplant a site, or install a landscape which is overtextured or overly complex in relationship to the historic resource, particularly in Zone A. In Zone A, new planting shall be species that were used historically or species of similar attributes. • In areas immediately adjacent to the landmark, Zone A and Zone B, plants up 42” in height, sod, and low shrubs are often appropriate. • Contemporary planting, walls and other features are not appropriate in Zone A. A more contemporary landscape may surround new development or be located in the rear of the property, in Zone C. • Do not cover areas which were historically unpaved with hard surfaces, except for a limited patio where appropriate. • Where residential structures are being adapted to commercial use, proposals to alter the landscape will be considered on a case-by-case basis. The residential nature of the building must be honored. • In the case of a historic landmark lot split, careful consideration should be given so as not to over plant either property, or remove all evidence of the landscape characteristics from before the property was divided. • Contemporary landscapes that highlight an AspenModern architectural style are encouraged. 110 Page 3 of 6 1.13 Additions of plant material to the landscape that could interfere with or block views of historic structures are inappropriate. • Low plantings and ground covers are preferred. • Do not place trees, shrubs, or hedgerows in locations that will obscure, damage, or block significant architectural features or views to the building. Hedgerows are not allowed as fences. • Consider mature canopy size when planting new trees adjacent to historic resources. Planting trees too close to a landmark may result in building deteriorate or blocked views and is inappropriate. • Climbing vines can damage historic structures and are not allowed. 3.1 Preserve the functional and decorative features of a historic window. • Features important to the character of a window include its frame, sash, muntins/mullions, sills, heads, jambs, moldings, operations, and groupings of windows. • Repair frames and sashes rather than replacing them. • Preserve the original glass. If original Victorian era glass is broken, consider using restoration glass for the repair. 7.3 Minimize the visual impacts of skylights and other rooftop devices. • Skylights and solar panels are generally not allowed on a historic structure. These elements may be appropriate on an addition. 7.10 Design gutters so that their visibility on the structure is minimized to the extent possible. • Downspouts should be placed in locations that are not visible from the street if possible, or in locations that do not obscure architectural detailing on the building. • The material used for the gutters should be in character with the style of the building. 10.3 Design a new addition such that one’s ability to interpret the historic character of the primary building is maintained. • A new addition must be compatible with the historic character of the primary building. • An addition must be subordinate, deferential, modest, and secondary in comparison to the architectural character of the primary building. • An addition that imitates the primary building’s historic style is not allowed. For example, a new faux Victorian detailed addition is inappropriate on an Aspen Victorian home. • An addition that covers historically significant features is inappropriate. • Proposals on corner lots require particular attention to creating compatibility. 10.6 Design a new addition to be recognized as a product of its own time. • An addition shall be distinguishable from the historic building and still be visually compatible with historic features. • A change in setbacks of the addition from the historic building, a subtle change in material, or a modern interpretation of a historic style are all techniques that may be considered to help define a change from historic construction to new construction. 111 Page 4 of 6 • Do not reference historic styles that have no basis in Aspen. • Consider these three aspects of an addition; form, materials, and fenestration. An addition must relate strongly to the historic resource in at least two of these elements. Departing from the historic resource in one of these categories allows for creativity and a contemporary design response. • Note that on a corner lot, departing from the form of the historic resource may not be allowed. • There is a spectrum of appropriate solutions to distinguishing new from old portions of a development. Some resources of particularly high significance or integrity may not be the right instance for a contrasting addition. 10.12 Design an addition to a historic structure that does not destroy or obscure historically important architectural features. • Loss or alteration of architectural details, cornices, and eavelines must be avoided. 12.3 Exterior light fixtures should be simple in character. • The design of a new fixture should be appropriate in form, finish, and scale with the structure. • New fixtures should not reflect a different period of history than that of the affected building, or be associated with a different architectural style. • Lighting should be placed in a manner that is consistent with the period of the building, and should not provide a level of illumination that is out of character. • One light adjacent to each entry is appropriate on an Aspen Victorian residential structure. A recessed fixture, surface mounted light, pendant or sconce will be considered if suited to the building type or style. • On commercial structures and AspenModern properties, recessed lights and concealed lights are often most appropriate. 12.4 Minimize the visual impacts of utilitarian areas, such as mechanical equipment and trash storage. • Place mechanical equipment on the ground where it can be screened. • Mechanical equipment may only be mounted on a building on an alley façade. • Rooftop mechanical equipment or vents must be grouped together to minimize their visual impact. Where rooftop units are visible, it may be appropriate to provide screening with materials that are compatible with those of the building itself. Use the smallest, low profile units available for the purpose. • Window air conditioning units are not allowed. • Minimize the visual impacts of utility connections and service boxes. Group them in a discrete location. Use pedestals when possible, rather than mounting on a historic building. • Paint mechanical equipment in a neutral color to minimize their appearance by blending with their backgrounds • In general, mechanical equipment should be vented through the roof, rather than a wall, in a manner that has the least visual impact possible. 112 Page 5 of 6 • Avoid surface mounted conduit on historic structures. Staff Finding: In general, the project has been successfully adjusted to resolve previous conditions of approval and clarify materials and details. The applicant is able to enjoy a small addition at the rear of the historic structure, greater energy efficiency in the historic structure, development of a new garage, and outdoor living area. The community will continue to appreciate the Chalet architecture, and a number of deterioration issues will be repaired and managed well into the future. The architect has requested replacement of the original glass in the historic windows with insulated glass that will be low profile and discreet. This is a good compromise to meet multiple goals. Similarly, the location of heat pumps has been clarified and they will be screened to minimize visual impacts. Staff supports the shift in the location of the new garage to create more separation between structures. Throughout this review, the importance of maintaining the character defining features of the historic driveway and the street-facing garage doors has been emphasized, though adjustments have been approved to allow the garage function to be abandoned in favor of living space. There are two details of this work that require HPC discussion as part of the amendment. First, while previous representations showed the driveway continuing to cross the neighbor’s property, it may be best to allow the driveway to neck down and remove that condition. A few options for locations of car tracks in the driveway are included in the packet. Staff recommends that staff and monitor continue to discuss the final layout with the architect, aiming to represent two parking space on-site. Only one must be truly usable to provide the necessary parking spaces. A second topic brought up by the amendment and related to the garage is the extent of landscaping shown at the front of the property. It is understood that some screening near the garage doors is desirable because of their new programming, however the amendment includes more shrubs at the front of the site than the Final approval. Staff and monitor should work with the applicant to balance privacy concerns with an appropriate level of simplicity in the landscape in the foreground of the Chalet and an overall reduction of plants. Staff’s most significant concern with the amendments is the proposal to reduce a new balcony approved for the northeast corner of the house by demolishing original exterior walls of the Chalet. Staff finds this to be inappropriate and not in compliance with the guidelines. While the approved addition to the resource is small, it is demolishing most of the rear façade of the historic home. There is no guarantee that additional build out won’t be proposed in the future and because demolition has not been limited to the connector element typically required between new and old, staff cannot support additional exterior wall demolition where the balcony is proposed. 113 Page 6 of 6 Staff finds the design guidelines related to the driveway and landscaping can be resolved through conditions of approval listed in the resolution. Staff does not support the balcony proposal. A comparison of the Final approval and amendment on the second floor is shown below. The areas of demolition are shown with a red arrow. 114 Exhibit B Setback Variation Criteria Staff Findings Page 1 of 1 26.415.110.C: Variations: Dimensional variations are allowed for projects involving designated properties to create development that is more consistent with the character of the historic property or district than what would be required by the underlying zoning's dimensional standards. 1. The HPC may grant variations of the Land Use Code for designated properties to allow: a) Development in the side, rear and front setbacks; b) Development that does not meet the minimum distance requirements between buildings; c) Up to five percent (5%) additional site coverage; d) Less public amenity than required for the on-site relocation of commercial historic properties. 2. In granting a variation, the HPC must make a finding that such a variation: a) Is similar to the pattern, features and character of the historic property or district; and/or b) Enhances or mitigates an adverse impact to the historic significance or architectural character of the historic property, an adjoining designated historic property or historic district. Staff Findings: No design guidelines speak directly to the preferred distance between the main house and garage, but the idea of detaching new construction and minimizing direct alterations to the historic resource is strongly encouraged in general. The design of the detached garage approved along the alley of the subject property is unchanged in this amendment. The garage meets the rear yard setback and the east sideyard. The proposed reduction is to allow the garage to be 3’ from the west property line where 5’ is required. This has the added affect of reducing the combined sideyards, which are measured at the narrowest points, from 7.4’ as approved (5’ west and 2.4’ on the east due to the location of the historic structure) to 5.4’ (3’ west and 2.4’ on the east due to the location of the historic structure. Staff can support this variation request based on criterion 2.b. above, finding that it further decreases impacts to the historic resource by increasing separation between the structures on the site. Since this project review began, the property to the west of the subject site finished construction of a fairly significant retaining wall. The neighboring development sits above the subject site. Abutting the garage close to the wall will help to soften its visual impact. In addition, because this historic resource sits nearly center on the site and at an angle, usable yard area is affected. This variation helps to improve that circumstance. Staff supports the granting of a 3’ west sideyard setback for the garage, a 5’4” combined sideyard, and a 2.4’ east sideyard due to the location of the historic resource. 115 CITY OF ASPEN COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT City of Aspen|130 S. Galena St.|(970) 920 5090 April 2020 LAND USE APPLICATION APPLICANT: REPRESENTIVATIVE: Description: Existing and Proposed Conditions Review: Administrative or Board Review Required Land Use Review(s): Growth Management Quota System (GMQS) required fields: Net Leasable square footage Lodge Pillows Free Market dwelling units Affordable Housing dwelling units Essential Public Facility square footage Have you included the following? FEES DUE: $ Pre-Application Conference Summary Signed Fee Agreement HOA Compliance form All items listed in checklist on PreApplication Conference Summary Name: Address: Phone#: email: Address: Phone #: email: Name: Project Name and Address: Parcel ID # (REQUIRED) CITY OF ASPEN COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT City of Aspen|130 S. Galena St.|(970) 920 5090 April 2020 Agreement to Pay Application Fees Please type or print in all caps Property Owner Name: Representative Name (if different from Property Owner): Billing Name and Address - Send Bills to: Contact info for billing: e-mail: Phone: I understand that the City has adopted, via Ordinance No. 20, Series of 2020, review fees for Land Use applications, and payment of these fees is a condition precedent to determining application completeness. I understand that as the property owner, I am responsible for paying all fees for this development application. For flat fees and referral fees: I agree to pay the following fees for the services indicated. I understand that these flat fees are non-refundable. $. flat fee for . $. flat fee for $. flat fee for . $. flat fee for For deposit cases only: The City and I understand that because of the size, nature, or scope of the proposed project, it is not possible at this time to know the full extent or total costs involved in processing the application. I understand that additional costs over and above the deposit may accrue. I understand and agree that it is impracticable for City staff to complete processing, review, and presentation of sufficient information to enable legally required findings to be made for project consideration unless invoices are paid in full. The City and I understand and agree that invoices sent by the City to the above listed billing address and not returned to the City shall be considered by the City as being received by me. I agree to remit payment within 30 days of presentation of an invoice by the City for such services. I have read, understood, and agree to the Land Use Review Fee Policy, including consequences for non-payment. I agree to pay the following initial deposit amounts for the specified hours of staff time. I understand that payment of a deposit does not render an application complete or compliant with approval criteria. If actual recorded costs exceed the initial deposit, I agree to pay additional monthly billings to the City to reimburse the City for processing my application at the hourly rates hereinafter stated. $ deposit for hours of Community Development Department staff time. Additional time above the deposit amount will be billed at $325.00 per hour. $ deposit for hours of Engineering Department staff time. Additional time above the deposit amount will be billed at $325.00 per hour. City of Aspen: Phillip Supino, AICP Community Development Director City Use: Fees Due: $ Received $ Case # Signature: PRINT Name: Title: An agreement between the City of Aspen (“City”) and Address of Property: City of Aspen Community Development Department Aspen Historic Preservation Land Use Packet City of Aspen | 130 S. Galena Street. | (970) 920 5090 Historic Land Use Application Requirements, Updated: March, 2020 ATTACHMENT 3 - Dimensional Requirements Form (Item #10 on the submittal requirements key. Not necessary for all projects.) Project: Applicant: Project Location: Zone District: Lot Size: Lot Area: (For the purposes of calculating Floor Area, Lot Area may be reduced for areas within the high-water mark, easements, and steep slopes. Please refer to the definition of Lot Area in the Municipal Code.) Commercial net leasable: Existing: Proposed: Number of residential units: Existing: Proposed: _______________________________ Proposed % of demolition: ____________________________________% DIMENSIONS: (write N/A where no requirement exists in the zone district) Floor Area: Height Principal Bldg.: Existing: Allowable: Proposed: Accessory Bldg.: Existing: Allowable: Proposed: On-Site parking: Existing: Required: Proposed: % Site coverage: Existing: Required: Proposed: % Open Space: Existing: Required: Proposed: Front Setback: Existing: Required: Rear Setback: Existing: Required: Combined Front/Rear: Indicate N, S, E, W Existing: Required: Side Setback: Existing: Required: Side Setback: Existing: Required: Combined Sides: Existing: Required: Distance between buildings Existing: Required: Proposed: Existing non-conformities or encroachments and note if encroachment licenses have been issued: Variations requested (identify the exact variances needed): 312 W. Hyman Avenue, Aspen, CO R-6 6,000 SF6,000 SF 1 1 0 18’-3”18’-3”25’ 2 2 23%50%29% 10’, 15’20’ 10’, 5’32’ 11’ w 2.4’ e 15’13.4’ Existing driveway encroaches on property to east. Eastern side yard setback. Non-orthogonal orientation. 312 W. Hyman Substantial Amendment to a Major Development POWDERDAYSKIING LLC Proposed: _______________ Existing: 1,869 SF Allowable: 3,240 SF Proposed: 2,202 SF +/- Proposed: 20’ Proposed: 3’-5’ (garage) Proposed: 7.4’ to 5.4’ Current approval is for 7.4’ combined side yard setback. Proposing 5.4’ combined side yard setback, consistent with new plumb concrete retaining wall 2’ from the property line to the West of the applicants property. Proposed 3’ w. Current is 5’ W Proposed: 2.4’ e Current April 2020 City of Aspen|130 S. Galena St.|(970) 920 5090 CITY OF ASPEN COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT Homeowner Association Compliance Policy All land use applications within the City of Aspen are required to include a Homeowner Association Compliance Form (this form) certifying that the scope of work included in the land use application complies with all applicable covenants and homeowner association policies. The certification must be signed by the property owner or Attorney representing the property owner. Property Owner (“I”): Name: Email: Phone No.: Address of Property: (subject of application) I certify as follows: (pick one) □This property is not subject to a homeowner association or other form of private c ovenant. □This property is subject to a homeowner association or private covenant, and the improvements proposed in this land use application do not require approval by the homeowners association or covenant beneficiary. □This property is subject to a homeowners association or private covenant and the improvements proposed in this land use application have been approved by the homeowners a ssociation or covenant beneficiary. I understand this policy and I understand the City of Aspen does not interpret, enforce, or manage the applicability, meaning or effect of private covenants or homeowner association rules or bylaws. I understand that this document is a public document. Owner signature: Date: Owner printed name: or, Attorney signature: Date: Attorney printed name: POWDERDAYSKIING LLC, David Tarrab, Managing Member david.tarrab@grupottt.net 312 W. Hyman Avenue, Aspen, CO X David Tarrab, Managing Member 12 March 2023 +52 55 5107 1018 City C970 PRE-APPLICATION CONFERENCE SUMMARY PLANNER: Amy Simon, Planning Director, amy.simon@aspen.gov DATE: March 1, 2023 PROJECT: 312 W. Hyman Avenue REPRESENTATIVE: Jeffrey Woodruff, Cloud Hill Design REQUEST: Substantial Amendment to a Major Development Approval SUMMARY: In July 2022, the Aspen Historic Preservation Commission granted Final Major Development approval for alterations to a landmarked property; 312 W. Hyman Avenue. Subsequently, it has been determined that some of the information the architect representing the property owner understood to have been properly presented to the Commission was not provided to the board for their evaluation in a manner that is consistent with their adopted policies or the Municipal Code. While the Final Major Development approval is valid, it is for the application as provided in the official packet for the July 27, 2022 meeting, available at aspen.gov: https://granicus_production_attachments.s3.amazonaws.com/cityofaspen/ee59346aa89a018b 51a7d5d60cf83b270.pdf with conditions stated in HPC Resolution #11, Series of 2022. The architect may continue to submit information to resolve the outstanding conditions of approval and prepare for building permit submittal for the official approval as described above. To the extent that the property owner wishes to pursue development that is not depicted in the official approval, a review of the updated information by HPC as a Substantial Amendment to Major Development is required. No matter the outcome of the Substantial Amendment, whether some, none or all of the amendments are accepted, the official approval from July 27th will remain in good standing and can be prepared for permit. This review is a one-step hearing, meaning that all details of the proposal will be presented to HPC in one application. Staff will evaluate the project and make a recommendation to HPC, and HPC will make a decision to approve, approve with conditions, or deny the proposal. Below are links to relevant documents and a list of information needed to submit an application. Relevant Land Use Code Section(s): 26.304 Common Development Review Procedures 26.415.070.E Amendments, Insubstantial and Substantial 26.575.020 Calculations and Measurements For your convenience – links to the application packet, the Design Guidelines and Land Use Code are below. Historic Preservation Land Use Packet Historic Preservation Design Guidelines Municipal Code Bel Review by: Staff for completeness and recommendations HPC for decisions Public Hearing: Yes Neighborhood Outreach: No Referrals: Staff may seek referral comments from the Building Department, Zoning, Engineering and Parks regarding any relevant code requirements or considerations. There will be no Development Review Committee meeting or referral fees. Planning Fees: $1,950 for 6 billable hours of staff time. (Additional/ lesser hours will be billed/ refunded at a rate of $325 per hour.) Referral Agencies Fee: $0 Total Deposit: $0. NO PLANNING FEES WILL BE ASSESSED FOR THIS APPLICATION AS A COURTESY FOR ANY STAFF MISCOMMUNICATION AT FINAL REVIEW. Please email the following as one pdf to amy.simon@aspen.gov. Completed Land Use Application and signed fee agreement. (Please enter $0 on all lines regarding fees on the agreement.) Pre-application Conference Summary (This document.) Street address and legal description of the parcel on which development is proposed to occur, consisting of a current (no older than 6 months) certificate from a title insurance company, an ownership and encumbrance report, or attorney licensed to practice in the State of Colorado, listing the names of all owners of the property, and all mortgages, judgments, liens, easements, contracts a nd agreements affecting the parcel, and demonstrating the owner’s right to apply for the Development Application. (The proof of ownership provided for Final review will be acceptable, regardless of date.) Applicant’s name, address and telephone number in a letter signed by the applicant that states the name, address and telephone number of the representative authorized to act on behalf of the applicant. HOA Compliance form An 8 1/2” by 11” vicinity map locating the parcel within the City of Aspen       List of adjacent property owners within 300’ for public hearing. (A new search is required if the previous search is more than 6 months old.) Site improvement survey including topography and vegetation showing the current status, certified by a registered land surveyor, licensed in the state of Colorado. A written and graphic explanation of the proposal and how it complies with the review standards and design guidelines relevant to the application. An accurate representation of all exterior building materials and finishes to be used in the development. Please include relevant cut-sheets for review. Disclaimer: The foregoing summary is advisory in nature only and is not binding on the City. The summary is based on current zoning, which is subject to change in the future, and upon factual representations that may or may not be accurate. The summary does not crea te a legal or vested right.     11 March 2023 Mr. David Alberto Tarrab Mees Powderdayskiing LLC PO Box 10261 Aspen, CO 81612 david.tarrab@grupottt.net Amy Simon, Planning Director, amy.simon@aspen.gov City of Aspen 427 Rio Grande Place 
 Aspen, CO 81611 Dear Amy: This letter is to certify that I, David Alberto Tarrab Mees, Managing Member of POWDERDAYSKIING LLC, the owner of the property located at 312 W. Hyman Avenue, Aspen, Colorado, give Cloud Hill Design, LLC. and its staff permission to represent us in discussion with the City of Aspen regarding the application for Substantial Amendment to a Major Development Approval Historic Preservation Benefits. If you should have any questions regarding this matter, please contact me. Cloud Hill Design LLC Jeffrey Woodruff, AIA, LEED AP 266 Light Hill Rd Snowmass, CO 81654 jeffrey@cloudhilldesign.com Yours very truly, David Tarrab Managing Memer POWDERDAYSKIING, LLC 2,400 400.0 Legend 1: WGS_1984_Web_Mercator_Auxiliary_Sphere Feet0400.0200.00 Notes 312 W Hyman parcel locate THIS MAP IS FOR INFORMATIONAL PURPOSES. Pitkin County GIS makes no warranty or guarantee concerning the completeness, accuracy, or reliability of the content represented. Map Created on 8:55 AM 03/12/23 at http://www.pitkinmapsandmore.com Driveway State Highway Road Centerline 4K Primary Road Secondary Road Service Road Town Boundary Federal Land Boundary BLM State of Colorado USFS 4,800 800.0 Legend 1: WGS_1984_Web_Mercator_Auxiliary_Sphere Feet0800.0400.00 Notes 312 W Hyman 300' Radius THIS MAP IS FOR INFORMATIONAL PURPOSES. Pitkin County GIS makes no warranty or guarantee concerning the completeness, accuracy, or reliability of the content represented. Map Created on 8:29 AM 03/11/23 at http://www.pitkinmapsandmore.com Driveway State Highway Road Centerline 4K Primary Road Secondary Road Service Road Town Boundary Federal Land Boundary BLM State of Colorado USFS Pitkin County Mailing List of 300 Feet Radius Pitkin County GIS presents the information and data on this web site as a service to the public. Every effort has been made to ensure that the information and data contained in this electronic system is accurate, but the accuracy may change. The information maintained by the County may not be complete as to mineral estate ownership and that information should be determined by separate legal and property analysis. Pitkin County GIS makes no warranty or guarantee concerning the completeness, accuracy, or reliability of the content at this site or at other sites to which we link. Assessing accuracy and reliability of information and data is the sole responsibility of the user. The user understands he or she is solely responsible and liable for use, modification, or distribution of any information or data obtained on this web site. This document contains a Mailing List formatted to be printed on Avery 5160 Labels. If printing, DO NOT "fit to page" or "shrink oversized pages." This will manipulate the margins such that they no longer line up on the labels sheet. Print actual size. From Parcel: 273512464006 on 03/11/2023 Instructions: Disclaimer: http://www.pitkinmapsandmore.com 220 WEST COOPER LLC ASPEN, CO 81611 625 E HYMAN AVE #201 235 W HOPKINS B LLC BOCA RATON, FL 33432 250 S OCEAN BLVD # 14A 400 W HOPKINS CONDO LLC DALLAS, TX 75209 5403 NEOLA DR AJAX APARTMENTS CONDO ASSOC ASPEN, CO 81611 COMMON AREA 301 W HYMAN AVE AJOY ASPEN LLC AVENTURA, FL 33180 18851 NE 29TH AVE #405 ALLAN ANDREW S DENVER, CO 80218 154 MARION ST ANCALA SHADOWVIEW RETREAT LLC DUBLIN, OH 43017 10277 MACKENZIE WY ASPEN A CONDO ASSOC ASPEN, CO 81611 COMMON AREA 308 W HOPKINS AVE ASPEN HIDEAWAYS LLC STUART, FL 34994 49 SW FLAGGER AVE #201 BDDC TRUST DALLAS, TX 75201 2100 ROSS AVE #550 BEHRENDT H MICHAEL TRUST ASPEN, CO 81611 334 W HYMAN AVE BRAFMAN FAMILY TRUST ASPEN, CO 81611 334 W HOPKINS BRAFMAN STUART REV TRUST CHEVY CHASE, MD 20815 5630 WISCONSIN AVE #401 BRAHMAN MARITAL TRUST ASPEN, CO 81611 334 W HOPKINS BROMLEY WENDI TRUST HONOLULU, HI 96815-4627 2969 KALAKAUA AVE #1201 CHARY REV TRUST LAS VEGAS, NV 89135 39 PANORAMA CREST AVE CHERNY ANDREA J ASPEN, CO 81611 301 WEST HYMAN AVE #5 CITY OF ASPEN ASPEN, CO 81611 427 RIO GRANDE PL CONNOR WILLIAM E II TRUST RENO, NV 89502 990 S ROCK BLVD #F CRAWFORD ALBERT SYRACUSE, NY 13204 201 SOLAR ST DHM FAMILY TRST ATLANTA, GA 30309 2288 PEACHTREE RD, NW #12 EDGEWATER PROPERTIES LLC OMAHA, NE 68022 18081 BURT ST EGBERT STEPHEN E ASPEN, CO 81611 301 W HYMAN AVE #1 FCB LLC SNOWMASS, CO 816549102 525 SHIELD O RD FINIGAN SC REAL ESTATE LLC BONITA SPRINGS, FL 34134 4851 BONITA BAY BLVD #2002 FISH EILEEN BOULDER, CO 80302 546 14TH ST FOSTER LOT 2 LLC ASPEN, CO 81611 625 E HYMAN AVE #201 FRANKEL KATHY TRUST NAPLES, FL 34102 280 GULF SHORE BLVD N GARET CONDO ASSOC ASPEN, CO 81611 400 E MAIN ST #2 GILDENHORN MICHAEL S BETHESDA, MD 20816 5008 BALTON RD GOSS CHESTER A IV ASPEN, CO 81612 PO BOX 9642 GROVER FREDRICK W & PAULA J ST PETERSBURG, FL 337043717 725 BRIGHTWATERG BLVD NE GUNN ROBERT W FAMILY TRST MARBLEHEAD, MA 01945 409 OCEAN AVE HARRISON MARK N BOULDER, CO 80302 546 14TH ST HOLTZMAN L BART & PATRICIA G RANCHO MIRAGE, CA 92270 2 SURREY CT JLR QPRT TRUST CORAL GABLES, FL 33156 355 MARQUESA DR JOBLON MATTHEW ENGLEWOOD, CO 80013 43 COVINGTON CT JOHNSTON FAMILY TRUST COSTA MESA, CA 92626 2018 PHALAROPE KASPAR THERESA D ASPEN, CO 81612 PO BOX 1637 KENDIG ROBERT & SUE ASPEN, CO 81612 PO BOX 4649 KOSTER RYAN & SUANNE ASPEN, CO 81611 400 W HOPKINS AVE #5 LITTLE CLOUD HOMEOWNERS ASSOC ASPEN, CO 81611 201 N MILL ST MARTEN RANDOLPH MONDOVI, WI 54755 129 MARTEN ST MARTIN SCOTT M ASPEN, CO 81611 PO BOX 51 MCCARTY DANIEL L ASPEN, CO 81612 PO BOX 4051 MILLER BRITT C ASPEN, CO 816111625 301 W HYMAN AVE APT 4 MORGAN DONALD ATLANTA, GA 30309 2288 PEACHTREE RD, NW #12 MULLINS MARGARET ANN ASPEN, CO 81611 216 W HYMAN AVE NANOOK RIDGE LLC ASPEN, CO 81611 324 W HOPKINS AVE #B NEVINS NATHALIE R ASPEN, CO 81611 127 NICHOLAS LN NORTON CAPITAL PARTNERS LLLP ASPEN, CO 81611 335 S SECOND ST PAN ABODE CONDO ASSOC ASPEN, CO 81611 211 W HOPKINS AVE PITKIN COUNTY ASPEN, CO 81611 530 E MAIN ST #301 RAINBOW CONNECTION PROPERTIES LLC MORRISON, CO 80465 151 SUMMER ST #771 RESSEL THOMAS G ASPEN, CO 816111625 301 W HYMAN AVE #7 REYNOLDS FRANK R IV ASPEN, CO 81612 PO BOX 2725 SAND KATHERINE M ASPEN, CO 81612 PO BOX 51 SCOTT BUILDING CONDO ASSOC ASPEN, CO 81611 400 W HOPKINS AVE SHADOW MOUNTAIN DUPLEX CONDO ASSOC ASPEN, CO 81611 COMMON AREA W HOPKINS AVE SHADOW MOUNTAIN LODGE CONDO ASSOC ASPEN, CO 81611 COMMON AREA W HOPKINS AVE SHADOW MTN HOMEOWNER ASSOC ASPEN, CO 81611 232 W HYMAN AVE SHADOWVIEW CONDO ASSOC ASPEN, CO 81611 320 W HOPKINS AVE SHERWIN ENTERPRISES LLC DURHAM, NC 27701 1714 VISTA ST SWISS CHALET/KITZBUHEL PARTNERSHIP ASPEN, CO 81611 333 E DURANT AVE TRAN LAN D ASPEN, CO 81612 PO BOX 2705 UNDERWOOD AMOS ASPEN, CO 81611 301 W HYMAN #6 UTOPIA LIVING ASPEN LLC SANTA MONICA, CA 90402 225 GEORGINA AVE VALLEY EXCHANGE PROPERTIES LLC ASPEN, CO 81611 122 W MAIN ST WEST ASPEN MOUNTAIN CONDO ASSOC ASPEN, CO 81611 333 S SECOND ST WEST SIDE CONDO ASSOC ASPEN, CO 81611 234 W HOPKINS AVE WINER CAROL G BETHESDA , MD 20817 6740 SELKIRK DR Land Use Application City of Aspen Historic Preservation Commission 27 March 2023 Application 12 April 2023 HPC Meeting Location: 312 W. Hyman Avenue, Aspen, CO (PID# 273512464006) Prepared by: Jeffrey H. Woodruff, AIA, for POWDERDAYSKIING, LLC An application for Major Development and Historic Preservation Benefits to remodel an AspenModern designated residence and provide a detached garage. PROJECT OVERVIEW This application is submitted on behalf of POWDERDAYSKIING LLC (the “Applicant”) for the property located at 312 W. Hyman Avenue, Aspen, Colorado, Parcel ID# 273512464006 (the “Property”). The Applicant seeks Major Development approval to remodel the existing AspenModern historically designated single-family residence, provide a detached garage, and make improvements to the landscape to enhance the visual characteristics of the historic resource. This application is submitted in conformance with the Pre-application Conference Summary dated 23 August 2021. An initial conceptual design review was held on 26 January 2022, presented by the applicant and a representative for the applicant. The application was publicly noticed. Final conceptual review was presented on 27 April 2022, continuing the conceptual design, with direction from the HPO and HPC on restudying the fenestration, elevations, landscaping, grading and lighting with respect to historic context and the promotion of the chalet style in Aspen. The application was publicly noticed. Final HPC review was presented on 27 July 2022. The applicant’s response and presentation on the 27th July 2022 are in accordance with City of Aspen Historic Preservation Design Guidelines per section 26.415.070.D.3.b2 and 3 of the Municipal Code and other applicable Code Sections. The applicant’s response and presentation on the 27th July 2022 are in accordance with the adoption of HPC Resolution #6, Series of 2022 and representations made by the applicant, the applicants representatives and staff at the 27th day of April, 2022 HPC regular meeting. The final HPC was publicly noticed on Friday, 10 June 2022. Images and notarized documentation are available for the posting and 300’ mailing. The application was presented to Council by City of Aspen staff in October 2022. The applicant appreciates the work by the city in assessing fees appropriate to the application (trees and permit), the duration between review cycles and multiple hearings. An updated final HPC review is set for 12 April 2023. The meeting will be publicly noticed by the applicant (300’ mailing) and the City of Aspen (newspaper). Property Background The Property survey for Lots P + Q Block 46 is located in the Medium-Density Residential (R-6), as per Sec. 26.710.040. Per the R-6, maximum allowable floor area is 3,240 SF for single-family residence (Allowable Floor Area for Single-Family Residence, applies to conforming and nonconforming lots of record). The existing residence contains approximately 1,669 SF of floor area. Based on this, approximately 1,571 SF of additional floor area could potentially be added. The existing single-family residence construction was completed in 1956 and is a representation of the “Chalet” style of architecture in Aspen. The house was constructed by Genevieve Birlauf Leininger and Julius Herman Birlauf. The Birlauf’s would arrive by rail to Aspen, their arrival noticed in the The Aspen Times and the Aspen Daily Times and the Rocky Mountain Sun in the 1950’s and 1960’s. The Aspen Times chronicled their travels to Aspen, Arkansas, Massachusetts and California. JH Birlauf on one trip traveled 5000 miles and visited 16 cities. Genevieve married Joseph Leininger, who served with the Department of Defense in Vienna through 1955. The single family house has seen several rounds of exterior modifications by the Birlauf family, primarily consisting of fenestration modifications, new drainage additions and irrigation and water punctures to the envelope and slab. The Property has had three owners. Genevieve sold the Property in 1986 to Jordan “Jordie” Gerberg. Jordie sold the Property to the City of Aspen at which time the Property was historically designated. 312 W. Hyman, Ord. 45 - 2006 The Property was historically designated in 2006 and the City of Aspen considers the existing residence to be an excellent example of the Chalet style of architecture which was commonly associated with early ski areas in the United States. Ordinance No. 45, Series of 2006 Designated 312 West Hyman Avenue, Lots P and Q, Block 46 City and Townsite of Aspen, Colorado to the Landmark to the Aspen Inventory of Historic Landmark and Sites and Structures During the City’s ownership, interior remodeling has occurred, including the addition of a new kitchen on the ground floor, replacement, or repair of exterior features such as decks and patios, and a new roof and gutters added. HPC Major Development / 312 W. Hyman Avenue / Parcel ID# 273512464006 Spring 2023 | Page 3 The former owner contracted with GZO Sheet Metal (Permit 0003.2013.ARGR) to replace tar and gravel roof with torch applied asphalt (3 layer torch down) this replaced the 1991 roof that was a Mansville built up, spec 4GNG. The work does not comply with grading and drainage. As per the City of Aspen, changed existing trim and fascia profile and gutter, 01/11/13 tear off existing deck membrane and roof, add box gutter to front of deck 0112.2012.ARGR A 14” aspen was removed in 2014, in order to install patio with pavers (assuming west patio). From City of Aspen referral comments in 2021 for other historic properties: “Snow stops will be required at all roof pitches that shed onto walking and driving paths and into emergency escape and rescue opening window wells (Ordinance 40, 2016).” The Applicant purchased 312 West Hyman Avenue, Lots P and Q, Block 46 (Property) from the City. Proposed Remodel, consistent with Historic Preservation Design Guidelines The Applicant wishes to update and provide improvements to the existing residence, in order to function more appropriately and comfortably for his family. The history as a family home and the story of the construction of the residence was an important factor in the purchase of the Property and the Applicant looks forward to ensuring this AspenModern resource is preserved and lived in for many years to come, while further respecting the historic character of the structure and its relationship to the site and landscape. Following are the proposed modifications to be made to the residence: •A small two-story addition on the north façade is proposed to provide additional seating, storage, and living space; inspired by Hotel Post, remaining in the building footprint, under the existing the North and East eaves. Hotel Post features in Friedel Pfeifer’s autobiography and Pfeifer credits the Austrian Chalet’s influence in Aspen building design. A two story addition was approved as per the contract with the seller, and further approved at conceptual and final with HPC. •A new deck on the northeastern corner of the residence will allow additional outdoor access. •A new entry on the west facade, using the existing rough opening, matching the historic divided light windows (a main entry door and sidelights). •Removal of the dropped ceiling, exposing the cold roof and providing energy updates (batt insulation, removal of the cold attic), removal of the attic vents and replacement with operable fenestration (no change in visual appearance on the North or South Facades, as the Romeo and Juliet balcony is untouched). A structural shear wall (1/2” ply to applied/installed and reduce interior habitable space) and detail at the North facade will not be visible from the exterior of the form. •New (aluminum clad) windows are proposed to be installed at the (north) addition which will enhance thermal performance and energy efficiency and allow more light into the interior of the residence; the existing attic vent will be replaced by a wood clad unit. •Infrared photography demonstrates the current performance of the single-pane leaky sieves; leading both the poor thermal performance and excess moisture potentially speeding up decay of the sills and building envelope. Existing South and West facing windows will be replaced with double pane IGU’s, meeting current I-codes and quarter round head, sill and jamb conditions will remain unchanged (visibly unchanged, but improved energy performance.). The new IGU’s are depicted in the window schedule, the include dark spacer bars and an air space (as narrow as possible), while still meeting currently adopted I- codes. •Two narrow (new) flush-mounted skylights (~12-28” x 34-36”) with operable light monitored shades (Velux, with light filtering shades to prevent vertical light pollution (no uplighting is proposed, but in order to protect dark skies, shades will be installed in deference to higher elevation neighbors). The skylights provide provide light to the upper level living space, deep in the living and kitchen areas. •The remaining garage space on the ground level will be converted to bedrooms; habitable spaces to capture the views of Shadow Mountain; people over automobiles. Today there is one garage space and one false garage door, both spaces will be converted to habitable spaces. •A new detached garage with roof mounted solar, energy storage and ski storage and trash enclosure will be located immediately off of the (North) alley; a permeable surface to connect the alley and the new garage; •The client has agreed to a 5’ sidewalk on the south extent of the property and/or to sign a sidewalk agreement. The applicant will work with the HPO on the details required to traverse the historic driveway, maintaining the character of the angled approach and its relationship to the structure. The HPO and applicant, as well as the City Forester and Parks, remain concerned about the tree drip zone of the blue HPC Major Development / 312 W. Hyman Avenue / Parcel ID# 273512464006 Spring 2023 | Page 4 spruce (South of the structure), the existing historic driveway alignment and the need for a hardscape/ sidewalk- when the neighboring parcels are head-in 90 degree parking hardscape. •Air spading in order to protect the remaining conifers on the North property line in conjunction with the City Forester and City Parks. Removal of Tree #1 (good shape) and Tree #2 (fair shape, would be removed with Tree #2). •We nominated the blue spruce, due South of the chalet, to the Colorado Tree Coalition Champion Tree Program. •New landscaping and outdoor gathering areas will compliment the historic resource. The landscaping will not obscure the historic resource. A new landscape entry sequence is proposed to providing way finding to the West entry (no monuments, just a movement of the postal box and a new garden path to the West of the blue spruce). •It is not anticipated that REMP fees will be due for the remodel. Heat tape will be used for health safety at the West entry. A circular hot tub less than 64 square feet will be installed in the North East backyard, 5’ from the property line (outside of the setback). •Roof mounted solar will offset the exterior energy use. Batteries in the garage will be charged and discharged as per terms set by Tesla. A car charger will be installed in the detached garage. The ground level will contain two habitable spaces bedrooms and the upper level one habitable space (three bedrooms total). The new addition on the north (not visible from the South or orthogonal view from \West Hyman) and east façades will “tuck” under the existing eaves, be minimally visible, and blend into the chalet-style architecture. The fenestration is designed to match the existing divided light patterns, and the rough openings are consistent with the fenestration pattern of the historic resource. A new interior staircase will replace the basement like stair approach today, with a code standard rise-run and landing. With the relocation of the garage, the existing mechanical and garage space on the ground level of the residence will be converted to bedrooms. The existing garage doors, will be maintained visually and historically. They will be converted to allow outdoor access from the two of the bedrooms on the ground level and provide for code required egress from the new bedrooms. Sliding glass doors will be placed behind the woo garage doors. Therefore, the historic use pattern of vehicular access directly off of Hyman Avenue will still be recognized and appreciated by passing pedestrians. The new detached garage located in the North East corner of the with entry off of the alley, meeting City of Aspen Residential Design Standards, will provide parking for a single vehicle. (The same as the existing use pattern). The garage will contain storage and incorporate a trash enclosure. A second off-street space will be provided via the existing south driveway (remaining permeable). The applicant will use permeable materials, such as gravel, connecting the alley to the single car garage, and in accordance with the site requirements of the City Forester. The landscape will feature a rustic, mountain aesthetic evocative of an alpine setting. A “two-track” driveway (permeable) will be maintained and employed to recall the historic vehicular use of the front yard while also minimizing the impacts of vehicles parked in front of the historic resource. Vehicles will still be able to use the two- track for parking. A rustic steppingstone path will provide access to the front door, to the West of the current driveway and blue spruce, connecting the askew residence to the street. Garden areas employing a native alpine plant palette will provide visual interest and help ground the historic resource. A private exterior patio space will be provided in the northeastern corner of the rear yard, hidden from view from the street, to take advantage of the southern exposure and views to Shadow Mountain. The landscaping will observe Fire Wise construction techniques, creating a defensible space to the residence, avoiding wood chips and keeping branches (working with the City Forester and City Parks) away from the residence. HPC Major Development / 312 W. Hyman Avenue / Parcel ID# 273512464006 Spring 2023 | Page 5 Variance for side yard setback was granted at Conceptual as per Resolution #6, Series of 2022 A side yard setback variance has been granted for the detached garage as per Resolution #6, Series of 2022. The City of Aspen, Zoning in the R-6 zone district is for a combined fifteen foot setback (is the code today). The existing askew primary residence is 2.4’ from the property boundary and the deck overhang is even less compliant with the current land use code. The proposed detached garage is five feet from the North, residential design standard -five foot rear setback (is met), and five feet from the West property lines (five foot side setback, but not compliant with today’s land use code in the R-6 zone district). We are proposing locating the garage and trash enclosure at 3’’ from the West property line. This updated variance would be also likely be supported by City of Aspen Parka and Forestry- leaving more space to the existing conifers and their drip lines. 312 West Hyman was granted a variance for the 15’ combined side yard setback for the for the purpose of constructing a garage. The combined side yard set back today is 7.4’. We are requesting 5.4’ (3’ West, 2.4’ East- existing condition for the askew chalet, as measured from the building not the overhanging deck)- for the health of the remaining conifers. This 3’’ West setback would also have the least impact on the mature conifers (#3, 4, and 5) and the utility service in the neighborhood (North Eastern part of the lot contains multiple utility connections). As per Resolution #6, Series of 2022 the proposed combined side yard setback of 7.4’ was granted) for the property (for the non- conforming historic asset). The garage location would improve sight lines for the property owner to the North and minimize any impact on the St Moritz. The St Moritz has an approximately six foot high retaining wall on the Western property line, so a single story garage with a 12.5’ ridge line would minimally impact the sight lines from the hotel to the alley. There are no changes/impact to the structure where it projects further into the East side yard (any structural work to this part of the deck etc). The East side of the deck is moving North, not East, so no further encroachment into the East setback. The variance request is consistent with 26.415.110 - Benefits: (2) In granting a variation, the HPC must make a finding that such a variation: Is similar to the pattern, features and character of the historic property or district; and/or Enhances or mitigates an adverse impact to the historic significance or architectural character of the historic property, an adjoining designated historic property or historic district. Amendment to the Variance for side yard setback granted Conceptual as per Resolution #6, Series of 2022 We have been granted in Resolutions 6 and 11 of 2022 a side yard set back variance. The house is at 2.4’ from the East Property line. The garage was proposed to be 5’ from the West property line. For a combined side yard set back of 7.4’. Given the new, plumb concrete retaining wall (at the St Moritz) is 2’ from the West property line, is there room to move the garage 2’ West, leaving the Chalet detached garage at 3’ from the property line? Thus increasing the distance between the house and detached garage, improving the light and air to the back yard. (This still leaves 5’ between the St Moritz wall and the Chalet garage). Our variance would then be for 5.4’ combined, rather than 7.4’ combined as granted in Resolution #6, Series of 2022. The current resolutions recorded two separate values for the combined side yard set back, but our assumption was for the current layout to support the garage 5’ from the West property line. The amendment to the variance would then be for a combined 5.4’ combined side yard setback. Difference to the St Mortitz? The single story gabled garage, whether at 5’ from the property line or 3’ from the property line would have limited impact on the St Moritz, given the grade change between the Chalet plumb concrete rationing wall (@2’ from the West property boundary) and the St Moritz property. Second encroachment not identified on the conditions of the sale, but on the survey The encroachment of the retaining wall to the West was identified in the sellers real estate contract and it has been rectified by the owner of the St Moritz. There is another encroachment by 312 West Hyman to 300 West Hyman. A “triangle” in the South West corner of the Swiss Chalet/Kitzbuhel Partnership. The encroachment into 300 West Hyman has existed prior to 1991 as per Pitkin Maps and the Aspen Base map. The owner and owner’s representative of 312 West Hyman have reached out HPC Major Development / 312 W. Hyman Avenue / Parcel ID# 273512464006 Spring 2023 | Page 6 to the owners of 300 West Hyman to identify and reach a mutually agreeable solution. The encroachment onto 300 West Hyman is 29.75 sq ft. (The area including the ROW is 172 sq ft - 29.75, so 142.25 is in the right of way) HPC Major Development / 312 W. Hyman Avenue / Parcel ID# 273512464006 Spring 2023 | Page 7 1991 Base Map 1,200 200.0 Legend 1: WGS_1984_Web_Mercator_Auxiliary_Sphere Feet0200.0100.00 Notes 1991 Aspen Area Base Overlay THIS MAP IS FOR INFORMATIONAL PURPOSES. Pitkin County GIS makes no warranty or guarantee concerning the completeness, accuracy, or reliability of the content represented. Map Created on 2:37 PM 04/01/23 at http://www.pitkinmapsandmore.com Driveway State Highway Road Centerline 4K Primary Road Secondary Road Service Road 1991 Encroachment to the East, > 18 Years. 2022 Base Map 1,200 200.0 Legend 1: WGS_1984_Web_Mercator_Auxiliary_Sphere Feet0200.0100.00 Notes 2022 Aspen Area Base Overlay THIS MAP IS FOR INFORMATIONAL PURPOSES. Pitkin County GIS makes no warranty or guarantee concerning the completeness, accuracy, or reliability of the content represented. Map Created on 2:35 PM 04/01/23 at http://www.pitkinmapsandmore.com Driveway State Highway Road Centerline 4K Primary Road Secondary Road Service Road 2022 Existing Conditions Referral Comments and working with city departments The applicant and their representatives have worked with the City of Aspen departments and addressed referral comments through the application. The applicant appreciates the calls and site visits and cooperation with the city departments. Engineering (Wyatt Young) Specifically, the applicant has agreed to install a floating sidewalk (city detail) if requested on West Hyman. Currently the neighboring parcels to the East and West feature head-in parking The access to the chalet primary parking is off of the alley. A (second) guest spot is available in the existing historic (non conforming) driveway pattern. Parks Department and Forestry (David Radeck and David Coon) Tree protection zones will be established. Air spading will be conducted as required, pre-construction. Limbing up and soil treatments for the health and preservation of the picea pungens. Removal of Trees #1, and consequently #2, through extensive consultation and on site meetings with the landscape architect, City of Aspen Parks and Forestry. Zoning Department (Sophie Varga) With the HPC Final application the Z sheets (with square footage, demolition calculations and site coverage) have been updated to reflect the addition to the North of the existing structure and a detached garage in the North West corner of the 6000 SF property. The setbacks and variances (non conforming historic structure) are shown on the architectural site plan. The hot tub is in conformance with the side-yard setback on the main level. The existing building and deck are non-conforming conditions and a variance has been granted for the historic property as per HPC Resolution #6 2022. A single car garage off of the alley is proposed and a second head in space, similar to circulation on the parcels to the East and West is available to guests of the chalet. Existing and proposed plans and existing and proposed elevations are in the HPC Final and Permit set. Exterior lighting is proposed for health safety at all egress as per current I-codes. The cut sheets for the lamps and luminaires are in the architectural electric sheets and meet current and proposed exterior lighting requirements. All luminaires will be installed using current wall penetrations. Building Department (Bonnie Muhigirwa) A single wythe masonry wall is scheduled for the Western wall of the garage. The garage is adjacent to the St Moritz ~6’ high concrete retaining wall (not an adjacent building, the St Moritz concrete retaining wall is 2’ West of the property line). The Garage Exterior Wall assembly will meet or exceed current I-codes for 1-hour fire- resistance; Section 302 Fire Resistant Construction, R302.1 Exterior Walls. The detached garage is greater than ten (10) feet from the residence/chalet. The hot tub is at grade and meets the COA spa safety railing requirements. HPC Major Development / 312 W. Hyman Avenue / Parcel ID# 273512464006 Spring 2023 | Page 8 Deferred maintenance plan for 312 W Hyman 1.Installation of gutters on East gables. Remove and install with blocking at fascia, structurally sound installation. Drain to existing dry well. 1.Today the (East) brown decorative fascia has a brown gutter in ~K style on the East decorative fascia and should be replaced by a simpler profile, not detracting from the decorative fascia. 2.Existing conditions:” The decorative fascia is not covered by the current East gutters. The former owner installed gutters without accounting for the run off from the west side of the site and did not file a construction management plan; so the water is imperiling the fascia, the structure and not handled onsite as per City Engineering. The installed gutters on the east side of the building threaten the decorative fascia. The existing gutters should be removed, installed with Box Style A1 to match the decorative trim and blocking should be added, toe nailed to the rafters, painted to match and guarddog 2” (or sim.) screws should used to install the new gutters (piercing the decorative trim and the newly installed blocking) 2.Installation of new gutters on West gables. Installation of snow guards at entries. Addition of blocking at fascia. Code requirements are not currently met: 1.Section R910 Snow shed design. Roofs shall be designed so that they do not shed ice and snow onto adjoining properties or potentially occupied areas such as a walkway, stairway, alley, deck, pedestrian and vehicular exit from buildings or areas where there is potential for personal injury or property damage and areas directly above or in front of gas utility or electric utility meters. 2.Section 1513 Snow shed design. Roofs shall be designed so that they do not shed ice and snow onto adjacent properties and potentially occupied areas such as a walkway, stairway, alley, deck, pedestrian and vehicular exit from buildings or areas where there is potential for personal injury or property damage and areas directly above or in front of gas utility or electric utility meters. 3.1504.6.1 Gutter securement for low-slope roofs. Gutters that are used to secure the perimeter edge of the roof membrane on low-slope (less than 2:12 slope) built-up, modified bitumen, and single-ply roofs, shall be designed, constructed and installed to resist wind loads in accordance with Section 1609 and shall be tested in accordance with Test Methods G-1 and G-2 of SPRI GT-1. 4.Style of Gutter: Box Style A1, 24 Gage Galvalume, Box Downspout, downspout straps and Elbow in 3” x 4” in 24 Gage Galvalume, color to match decorative trim. (As per Historic Guidelines: 7.10 Design gutters so their visibility on the structure is minimized to the extent possible. Downspouts should be placed in locations that are not visible from the street if possible, or in locations that do not obscure architectural detailing on the building. The material used for the gutters should be in character with the style of the building.) 5.Gutters, Box Style A measure 3” deep/high and 4” wide (minimum as per mfr.) West: The interior measurement of the fascia on the West is 10 1/4” deep/high. East: The east gutters will not cover the decorative fascia, which appear narrower at ~8” deep. The east gutters, as currently installed do not cover the decorative facia, but are a building and health and safety concern (all hardware daylights, shiners, typ). 1.The above meets both City of Aspen Engineering requirements and Historic Preservation Guidelines- Gutters, Downspouts, Snowstops, and Snow Fences Gutters and downspouts are used to divert water away from a structure. Without this drainage system, water may splash off the roof onto exterior walls and run along the foundation of the building. Snowstops and snow fences are used to protect inhabitants and the building from the sudden snow avalanches that rip off architectural details and can cause serious injury. Gutters can be seen in some 19th century photos of historic buildings and are more common on AspenModern structures. Overall, the visual impact of these functional elements should be minimized. 3.Excavation and installation of dry well (new) to capture and release West gable run-off and garage run-off. As per updated civil grading and drainage. 4.Seal and repair slab at garage and boiler room. Removal of outmoded boiler flu. Repair and or reuse roof penetrations. 5.Radon is present, but slab penetrations remain today. Install new radon system over sealed slab. Integrate Radon system into building, rather than additive exterior solution. HPC Major Development / 312 W. Hyman Avenue / Parcel ID# 273512464006 Spring 2023 | Page 9 6.Repair and replace (flu) chimney flue, masonry, waterproofing, cap and code compliant exhaust. 7.Insect proofing of existing attic vents, temporary. Remove. 8.Repair stucco at South West corner for multiple penetrations by existing boiler room. 9.Replace waster line and water line (assume deteriorated), when excavating for North addition. 10.Care and maintenance and fire wise treatment (limb up and water saving measures) of South blue spruce. Nominated Picea pungens for State Champion Tree. 11.Increase electrical service from City of Aspen commensurate with reduction in outmoded gas service and whole house electrification, on site energy production and storage. Application meets the conditions of approval, as per Resolution #11 of 2022 Précis: All drawings have been updated as of 11 March 2023 to reflect the conditions of the resolution. All drawings are in a combined PDF: 1. To provide Drainage and Utility Plans with details and the final location of the proposed drain basins, to not conflict with any of the trees propose to maintain, that the drainage design is compliant, and other utilities for review and approval by staff and monitor prior to building permit submittal. An updated civil grading and drainage plan stamped on 03.10.2023 has been provided. See C.001 through C.013 2. To provide Roof Plan with detailed location of gutters, downspouts, snow clips, vents, mechanical, and all roof penetrations, etc. for review and approval by staff and monitor prior to building permit submittal. An updated roof plan has been provided by the Structural Engineer as of 03.09.2023. See S1.2 Updated Structural Roof Plan, See A105 Roof Plan Proposed , See A108 Roof Plan Existing. The roof plan reflects the 02/21/2023 meeting with HPO/Staff. Two skylights are shown, as per the original conceptual meeting and feedback from the HPO/Planning Director. 3. To provide a detailed Preservation Plan including documentation of existing conditions and investigation of historic materials for review and approval by staff and monitor prior to building permit submittal. In addition to the prior submitted historic preservation plan, modeled on HABS, we have provided side-by- side elevations and roof plans showing current and approved. See A220 Elevations Preservation Plan. 4. To provide drawings of the chimney for review and approval by staff and monitor prior to building permit submittal . Specify final location, height, and all other details related to the chimney, etc. An updated roof plan has been provided. Updated structural has been provided. No change in “visibility” of chimney, just removing cracked, leaky existing chimney. New stucco to match existing building. An updated roof plan has been provided. See S1.2 Updated Structural Roof Plan, See A105 Roof Plan Proposed , See A108 Roof Plan Existing. 5. To provide shading at all skylight locations. Specified V-lux with shades. See A601 for Velux with Electric Shades. Included cut sheets for downlight/IC rated cans. No interior uplighting specified. 6. To provide details on the garage overhangs and window elements for review and approval by staff and monitor prior to building permit submittal . See A105 for existing and proposed. As per preservation plan and elevations. Utilize existing shutters, typ. Existing windows- As per staff, installing double pane glass of the thinnest dimension, with a dark spacer; the applicant continues: to match existing RO, new windows to match head, sill and jamb thickness, as nearly as possible. We will use the current wood frames and replace the glass with double pane IGU’s (low-e coating and U-value to meet 2021 ICC). New windows- New windows to meet currently adopted I-codes. Re: North addition, all windows are Loewen low-e double pane with dark frame to match existing quarter round frames. See schedule, which outlines preservation plan for existing quarter round windows and North addition. HPC Major Development / 312 W. Hyman Avenue / Parcel ID# 273512464006 Spring 2023 | Page 10 7. To provide information for all new window layouts and proportions to be reviewed for context and consistency with the existing windows on the main residence and approval by staff and monitor prior to building permit submittal. As per HPC See A200 and A201. See sheets H1, H2 and H3 for consistency with existing, April 2022 proposed and April 2023 review for context and consistency. New house all electric, so an improved envelope will be permitted for the walls, new insulated (not cold attic) roof and window assemblies. Our assemblies are in accordance with I-Codes (2021 as per this application), for the airtightness of the envelope and health of the occupants. The envelope from the 1950’s is not in accordance with currently adopted building code. In our work on historic remodels we perform a blower door test before construction, a manual-J calculation to size loads and a blower door test either post envelope work or post construction. Our emphasis in the remodel is to improve the ACH from a leaky 1950’s envelope (interior back to the studs and ceiling cavity with new blown in insulation) and improve the thermal comfort for the occupants. 8. The proposed combined side yard setback variance of 7.5’ is granted for the property for the non-conforming historic asset. See above for a new variance request, given the new plumb concrete retaining wall 2’ from the St Moritz (East) property line. 9. Final material selection will be approved via staff and monitor. See A700 Exterior Materials. Client to repoint and repaint (colors to be determined during staff and monitor / construction administration. Full treatment detailed in presentation plan. 10. Add a 24” maintenance edge at the border of the resource. We received a request from staff for a 12” maintenance edge, which was doubled to 24" at the July 2023 HPC Final review. We will comply with the more stringent of requirements in order to protect and preserve the historic resource as per Historic Guidelines. 11. Review and approval of the details for the final fence design by staff and monitor. See L2.001 and L2.002 HPC Major Development / 312 W. Hyman Avenue / Parcel ID# 273512464006 Spring 2023 | Page 11 Floor Area The proposed additions represent a very small amount of additional floor area. The garage contains a total of 308 SF, which is exempt as per the Sale to the current owner. In the contract of sale, an approval of 434 bonus square footage was awarded.. Utilizing the garage exemptions for a detached garage located off of alley, ZERO SF of the garage will contribute to floor area. The additions to the north will add square footage as per the Zoning Sheets. 1070 SF remain unbuilt as per the R6 zone district. The new proposed decks, with the existing deck space included, represent 311 + 32 (new deck to the North East) for a total of 344 SF which is less than the 15% of maximum floor area allowed exempt from floor area (486 SF = 3,240 * .15). Planning a Preservation Project The Applicant appreciates the efforts to date by the Historic Preservation Commission and the City of Aspen departments in connection with the proposed remodel and protection and preservation of this Aspen Historic resource. Summary The owner is responsible for both the benefits accrued to the historic character of the resource and its beautiful setting. The owner wishes to improve the artifacts in need of restoration and enhance the character and livability of the historic resource. HPC Major Development / 312 W. Hyman Avenue / Parcel ID# 273512464006 Spring 2023 | Page 12 SHEET TITLE INTEGRATED DESIGN TEAM PROJECT NO: MODEL FILE: DRAWN BY: COPYRIGHT: SHEET 1 A001 Jeffrey H Woodruff 312_W_Hyman_03312023.pln Project No. 116 /Users/jeffrey/Documents/Cloud Hill/Rainbow/structural/312_W_Hyman_03312023.plnPowder Day Skiiing, LLC, David A Tarrab Mees Cover Sheet 312 W Hyman Ave 312 W Hyman Ave Lots P+Q, Block 46 Aspen CO 81611 USA/ Pitkin County UGB, City of Aspen 312 W Hyman Ave Aspen CO 81611 USA Account # R000145 Parcel ID # 273512464006 Landscape Architect Jennifer M. Dolecki-Smith, RLA Escape Garden Design, LLC Civil Grading and Drainage Jay Engstrom, P.E. Crystal River Civil, LLC Structural Engineer Brian Rossiter, P.E. bwr.pe Contractor COA- HPO Site Visit08/22/21 Jeffrey H. Woodruff AIA, LEED AP Cloud Hill Design, LLC Snowmass CO 81654 USA COA- HPC Conceptual02/26/22 COA- HPC Conceptual04/27/22 COA- HPC Final07/27/22 COA- City Council Call Up10/12/22 COA- HPC Final04/12/23 SHEET INDEX A001 V1 V2 C.001 C.002 C.003 C.004 C.005 C.006 C.007 C.008 C.009 C.010 C.011 C.012 C.013 L.2.001 L.2.002 S 0.0 S 1.0 S 1.1 S 1.2 S 2.0 S 2.1 Z001 Z002 Z003 Z004 Z005 Z006 Z008 H1 H2 H3 H4 H5 H6 H7 H8 H9 A101 A103 A104 A105 A106 A107 A108 A110 A110 A200 A201 A203 A204 A211 A300 A301 A500 A501 A600 A601 A901 A- E100 Cover Sheet Improvement Survey Topographic Survey Plat Title Existing Conditions Demolition Plan Grading Plan Basins Subbasins Drainage Layout Drainage Profiles Utility Plan Erosion Control Details Engineering & Drainage Report Engineering & Drainage Report Tree Removal and Mitigation Proposed Landscape Plan General Notes and Typical Details Foundation Plan Upper Level & Garage Roof Framing Plans Roof Framing Plan Details Details Floor Area Calculations Floor Area Calculations Height Measurements Wall Demolition Calculations Site Coverage Zoning Summary Forestry Site Coverage Historic, Approved, Substantial Historic, Approved, Substantial Historic, Approved, Substantial Historic, Approved, Substantial Historic, Approved, Substantial Historic, Approved, Substantial Historic Precedent and Palette Landscape Approved Substantial Civil Approved, Substantial Architectural Site Plan Main Level Proposed Plan Second Level Proposed Plan Roof Plan Proposed Main Level Existing Plan Second Level Existing Plan Roof Plan Existing Main Level RCP Second Level RCP Elevations Proposed Elevations Proposed Existing Elevations Existing Elevations Garage Elevations Transverse Sections Longitudinal Sections Schedules Schedules Assemblies & Plan Details Assemblies- Skylights, Fenestration Relationship to Neighborhood Electrical Narrative 312 W H y m a n 3 Relationship to the Neighborhood A001 A.F.F. ADJ. ALT. A.B. & ARCH. @ BM. BM. PKT. BRG. BLK'G. BOT. B.F. BLDG. B.O. CAB. CLG. CL. C.T. CLR. COL. CONC. CONN. CONT. DTL. DBL. DWL. E.W. ELEV. OR EL. EXIST'G EXT. F.F. F.D. FLR. FTG. FND. GA. G.L. G.W.B. G.S. HB. HT. HK. HORIZ. HYD. ABOVE FINISH FLOOR ADJUSTABLE ALTERNATE ANCHOR BOLTS AND ARCHITECTURAL AT BEAM BEAM POCKET BEARING BLOCKING BOTTOM BOTTOM OF FOOTING BUILDING BY OWNER CABINET CEILING CENTER LINE CERAMIC TILE CLEAR COLUMN CONCRETE CONNECTION CONTINUOUS DETAIL DOUBLE DOWEL EACH WAY ELEVATION EXISTING EXTERIOR FINISHED FLOOR FLOOR DRAIN FLOOR FOOTING FOUNDATION GAUGE GLU-LAM GYPSUM WALL BOARD GAS STUB HOSE BIB HEIGHT HOOK HORIZONTAL HYDRANT INFO. INSUL. JST. L.L. LONGINT. N.I.C. O.C. OPP. O/ PTD. PERF. PL. PLY. PROP. LINE REINF. RDWD. REQ'D. RESIL. REV. S.M. SIM. S.F. OR SQ. FT. STD. STL. STDS. THK. TLT. T.F. T.P. T.L. T.W. TOT. T.B. TRANSV. TYP. U.N.O. V.I.F. VERT. V.W.C. W.C. W.H. W.P. W.R. WIN. W/ WD. INFORMATION INSULATION JOIST LIVE LOAD LONGITUDINAL NOT IN CONTRACT ON CENTER OPPOSITE OVER PAINTED PERFORATED PLATE PLYWOOD PROPERTY LINE REINFORCEMENT REDWOOD REQUIRED RESILIENT REVISED SHEET METAL SIMILAR SQUARE FEET STANDARD STEEL STUDS THICK TOILET TOP OF FOOTING TOP OF PLATE TOP OF LEDGE TOP OF WALL TOTAL TOWEL BAR TRANSVERSE TYPICAL UNLESS NOTED OTHERWISE VERIFY IN FIELD VERTICAL VINYL WALL COVERING WATER CLOSET WATER HEATER WATERPROOF WATER RESISTANT WINDOW WITH WOOD 312 W Hyman Ave Powder Day Skiiing, LLC, David A Tarrab Mees 312 W Hyman Ave Lots P+Q, Block 46 Aspen CO 81611 USA/Pitkin County UGB, City of Aspen PROJECT: Renovation, Energy Upgrades and Historic Preservation ADDRESS: 312 W Hyman Ave, Aspen, CO 81611 COUNTY: Pitkin County PARCEL NUMBER: 73512464006 PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Interior Renovation and Energy Upgrades, IECC Compliance ZONING: R6 Medium Density Residential CONSTRUCTION TYPE: VB OCCUPANCY GROUP: RESIDENTIAL FIRE PROTECTION: Non-sprinklered NUMBER OF STORIES: TWO ELEVATION 100= 7901.36' SITE RS6 = 6000 SF 1. CONTRACTOR TO COMPLY WITH CODES, LAWS, ORDINANCES, RULES, AND REGULATIONS OF PUBLIC AUTHORITIES GOVERNING THE WORK. 2. CONTRACTOR TO REVIEW DOCUMENTS, VERIFY DIMENSIONS AND FIELD CONDITIONS AND CONFIRM THAT WORK IS BUILDABLE AS SHOWN. CONTRACTOR TO REPORT ANY CONFLICTS OR OMISSIONS TO THE ARCHITECT FOR CLARIFICATION PRIOR TO PERFORMING ANY WORK IN QUESTION. 3. FOR SUBSTITUTIONS, REFER TO THE SPECIFICATIONS. 4. DO NOT SCALE DRAWINGS. DIMENSIONS SHALL TAKE PRECEDENCE OVER SCALES SHOWN ON DRAWINGS, GENERAL CONTRACTOR SHALL VERIFY ALL DIMENSIONS, GRADES AND CONDITIONS AT SITE PRIOR TO COMMENCING THE WORK. 5. MAINTAIN DIMENSIONS MARKED 'CLEAR'. ALLOW FOR THICKNESS OF FINISHES. 6. CEILING HEIGHT DIMENSIONS ARE TO FINISHED SURFACES. 7. CONTRACTOR TO COORDINATE AND PROVIDE BACKING FOR MILLWORK AND ITEMS ATTACHED OR MOUNTED TO WALLS OR CEILINGS. 8. EXCEPT WHERE SHOWN IN DIMENSIONAL DETAIL, THE LOCATIONS OF PLUMBING, MECHANICAL EQUIPMENT, DUCTS, PIPING AND FITTINGS ARE ONLY APPROXIMATE. THE EXACT LOCATIONS SHALL BE DETERMINED BY THE CONTRACTOR, SUBJECT TO APPROVAL BY THE ARCHITECT. 9. CONTRACTOR SHALL PROVIDE AND INSTALL ALL STIFFENERS, BRACING, BLOCKING, AND SUPPORTING BRACKETS REQUIRED FOR THE INSTALLATION OF ALL CASEWORK, TOILET ROOM ACCESSORIES, FIXTURES AND PARTITIONS AND ALL WALL MOUNTED OR SUSPENDED MECHANICAL, ELECTRICAL OR MISCELLANEOUS EQUIPMENT AND FURNISHINGS. 10. ALL WORK PERFORMED SHALL COMPLY WITH THE CONTRACT DOCUMENTS, DRAWINGS, SPECIFICATIONS, AND GEOTECHNICAL INVESTIGATION AND PAVEMENT RECOMMENDATIONS. 11. SPECIFICATIONS, BOUND SEPARATELY, ARE PART OF THE CONTRACT DOCUMENTS. 12. ALL MATERIALS AND WORKMANSHIP SHALL CONFORM TO THE DRAWINGS AND SPECIFICATIONS. IF CONFLICT IS FOUND BETWEEN DRAWINGS, GENERAL NOTES AND SPECIFICATIONS, CONSULT THE ARCHITECT BEFORE PROCEEDING WITH THE WORK. 13. THE STRUCTURAL, MECHANICAL AND ELECTRICAL DRAWINGS ARE SUPPLEMENTARY TO THE ARCHITECTURAL DRAWINGS. IT SHALL BE THE RESPONSIBILITY OF THE CONTRACTOR TO CHECK WITH THE ARCHITECTURAL DRAWINGS BEFORE THE INSTALLATION OF STRUCTURAL, MECHANICAL AND ELECTRICAL WORK. SHOULD THERE BE A DISCREPANCY BETWEEN THE ARCHITECTURAL DRAWINGS AND THE CONSULTING ENGINEERS' DRAWINGS THAT WOULD CAUSE AN AWKWARD INSTALLATION, IT SHALL BE BROUGHT TO THE ARCHITECT'S AND ENGINEERS' ATTENTION FOR CLARIFICATION PRIOR TO THE INSTALLATION OF SAID WORK. 14. GENERAL NOTES ARE NOT A SUBSTITUTE NOR A REPLACEMENT FOR THE PROJECT SPECIFICATIONS. THESE NOTES ARE INTENDED AS A GUIDE TO THE DESIGN AND/OR CONSTRUCTION REQUIREMENTS ESTABLISHED FOR THIS PROJECT. 15. NO CONTRACTOR SHOULD ATTEMPT TO BID OR CONSTRUCT ANY PORTION OF THE WORK WITHOUT CONSULTING THE PROJECT SPECIFICATIONS. 16. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL COORDINATE THE INTENT OF THE GENERAL NOTES WITH ALL TRADES Snow-load: TBC PSF, Up to 8000' Elevation, Elevation is 7901.36' 100' as per Civil = 7901.36' Roof Duration = 1.0 Seismic Design Category = B or C, as per Figure R301.2 (2) As per soil design category Weathering probability for Concrete = Severe Termite Infestation Probability = None to slight Wind Speed = 115 mph (ultimate design) Wind Exposure = B or C, Section R301.2.1.4 Frost Depth = 36", TBC (up to 8000' Elevation) Air Freezing Index = TBC° F Days – Up to 8000 ft. elevation Ice Barrier Underlayment = Required Mean Annual Temp = variable Insulation = as per Minimum R-Values per 2009 IECC, Table 402.1.1, Client chooses to utilize stricter minimums as per 2018 IECC for thermal comfort and energy efficiency. As per State House Bill 09-1091, CO alarms are required within 15 feet of all sleeping rooms BUILDING Currently Adopted Codes. The client will conform with currently adopted IECC (Assemblies and Fenestration) and the updated land use code for Energy Efficiency on Earth Day 2020. Project summary as per Land Use Code: 1. The historic building and the site remains key elements of the property and the new development does not compromise the visual integrity of the historic property; and 2. The new construction is reflective of the proportional patterns found in the historic building's forms, materials and openings, or the work removes later alterations and restores the historic building to its appearance during its period of significance; and 3.The project is compatible with the character of the neighborhood in which it is located; and 4. Historic outbuildings site and landscape features are retained and stabilized and restored, as appropriate. The project conforms to City of Aspen Chapter 26: Title 26- Land Use Regulations Part 400- Development Permit as of Right Part 500- Supplementary Regulations 27 March 2023 SHEET TITLE INTEGRATED DESIGN TEAM PROJECT NO: MODEL FILE: DRAWN BY: COPYRIGHT: SHEET 2 V1 Jeffrey H Woodruff 312_W_Hyman_03312023.pln Project No. 116 /Users/jeffrey/Documents/Cloud Hill/Rainbow/structural/312_W_Hyman_03312023.plnPowder Day Skiiing, LLC, David A Tarrab Mees Improvement Survey 312 W Hyman Ave 312 W Hyman Ave Lots P+Q, Block 46 Aspen CO 81611 USA/ Pitkin County UGB, City of Aspen 312 W Hyman Ave Aspen CO 81611 USA Account # R000145 Parcel ID # 273512464006 Landscape Architect Jennifer M. Dolecki-Smith, RLA Escape Garden Design, LLC Civil Grading and Drainage Jay Engstrom, P.E. Crystal River Civil, LLC Structural Engineer Brian Rossiter, P.E. bwr.pe Contractor COA- HPO Site Visit08/22/21 Jeffrey H. Woodruff AIA, LEED AP Cloud Hill Design, LLC Snowmass CO 81654 USA COA- HPC Conceptual02/26/22 COA- HPC Conceptual04/27/22 COA- HPC Final07/27/22 COA- City Council Call Up10/12/22 COA- HPC Final04/12/23 (S75°1 1 ' 0 9 " E 6 0 . 0 0 ' ) S75°14 ' 5 8 " E 5 8 . 5 9 ' E E E G (N14°50'49"E 100.00')N15°05'12"E 99.90' S14°50'49"W 100.00'N75°09 ' 1 1 " W 6 0 . 0 0 ' BASIS O F B E A R I N G S FOUND NO. 5 REBAR FOUND NO. 5 REBAR FOUND NO. 5 REBAR SET FOUND NO. 5 REBAR & 1-1/4" ORANGE PLASTIC CAP PROP CORNER TNC PLS38215 (20.90' W I D E ) GRAVE L A L L E Y ALLEY - B L O C K 4 6 LOT P LOT Q LOT O LOT N LOT R LOT S W. HY M A N A V E N U E (74.80' W I D E P U B L I C ) SE CORNER BLOCK 46 FOUND REBAR & 1-1/2" ALUMINUM CAP (NO STAMPING) N75°09 ' 1 1 " W 5 9 . 9 2 ' (60.00' ) 33.4' 4.0' 4.9' 8.3' 5.5' 11.5' 0.7' 0.7'2.2'0.8' 0.7' 0.7'0.8'2.2'9.2'0.8'0.8'38.4'21.2'7.2'11.1' ( T I E )19.8'(TIE)0.8' 2.4' (TIE)13.4'5.5' APPARENT ENCROACHMENT DRIVEWAY & WOOD RETAINING GRAVEL DRIVEWAYWOOD RETAININGWOOD RETAININGAPPARENT ENCROACHMENT R.R.TIE WALL CONCRETE APRO N UPPER DECK STEPS FLAGSTONE PATIO SIDEWALK2 - STORY FRAME HOUSE 312 WEST HYMAN AVENUE 5976± SQ.FT.NEIGHBORING RESIDENCECONCR E T E C U R B & G U T T E R PAVED R O A D W A Y MAILB O X 4.4' APPARENT ENCROACHMENT WOOD RETAINING ELECTRIC PEDESTAL CATV PEDESTAL TELEPHONE PEDESTAL GAS METER ELECTRICAL METER G LEGEND E SURVEYOR'S CERTIFICATION SURVEY NOTES: LOTS P & Q - BLOCK 46, CITY AND TOWNSITE OF ASPEN SECTION 12, TOWNSHIP 10 SOUTH, RANGE 85 WEST OF THE 6TH PM COUNTY OF PITKIN, STATE OF COLORADO IMPROVEMENT SURVEY PLAT TRUE NORTH COLORADO LLC. A LAND SURVEYING AND MAPPING COMPANY PO BOX 614 - 529 S. WILD HORSE DRIVE NEW CASTLE, COLORADO 81647 (970) 984-0474 www.truenorthcolorado.com PROJECT NO: 2019-104 DATE: JANUARY 18, 2019 DRAWN RPK SURVEYED LDV SHEET 1 OF 1 TRUENORTH A LAND SURVEYING AND MAPPING COMPANY 8'4'16' SCALE: 1" = 8' N PROPERTY DESCRIPTION:0 SCHEDULE B PART II TITLE EXCEPTIONS: SHEET TITLE INTEGRATED DESIGN TEAM PROJECT NO: MODEL FILE: DRAWN BY: COPYRIGHT: SHEET 3 V2 Jeffrey H Woodruff 312_W_Hyman_03312023.pln Project No. 116 /Users/jeffrey/Documents/Cloud Hill/Rainbow/structural/312_W_Hyman_03312023.plnPowder Day Skiiing, LLC, David A Tarrab Mees Topographic Survey Plat 312 W Hyman Ave 312 W Hyman Ave Lots P+Q, Block 46 Aspen CO 81611 USA/ Pitkin County UGB, City of Aspen 312 W Hyman Ave Aspen CO 81611 USA Account # R000145 Parcel ID # 273512464006 Landscape Architect Jennifer M. Dolecki-Smith, RLA Escape Garden Design, LLC Civil Grading and Drainage Jay Engstrom, P.E. Crystal River Civil, LLC Structural Engineer Brian Rossiter, P.E. bwr.pe Contractor COA- HPO Site Visit08/22/21 Jeffrey H. Woodruff AIA, LEED AP Cloud Hill Design, LLC Snowmass CO 81654 USA COA- HPC Conceptual02/26/22 COA- HPC Conceptual04/27/22 COA- HPC Final07/27/22 COA- City Council Call Up10/12/22 COA- HPC Final04/12/23 M I (S7 5 ° 1 1 ' 0 9 " E 6 0 . 0 0 ' ) S7 5 ° 1 4 ' 5 8 " E 5 8 . 5 9 ' E E G (N14°50'49"E 100.00') N15°05'12"E99.90' S14°50'49"W 100.00'N75 ° 0 9 ' 1 1 " W 6 0 . 0 0 ' BA S I S O F B E A R I N G S FOUND N O . 5 R E B A R FOUND N O . 5 R E B A R FOUND N O . 5 R E B A R SITE BEN C H M A R K SET FOU N D N O . 5 R E B A R & 1-1/4" OR A N G E P L A S T I C C A P PROP CO R N E R T N C P L S 3 8 2 1 5 ELEVATIO N : 7 9 0 0 . 8 4 (20. 9 0 ' W I D E ) GR A V E L A L L E Y ALL E Y BL O C K 4 6 LO T P LO T Q LO T O LO T N LO T R LO T S W. H Y M A N A V E N U E (74. 8 0 ' W I D E P U B L I C ) SE CORN E R BLOCK 4 6 FOUND R E B A R & 1 - 1 / 2 " ALUMINU M C A P (NO STA M P I N G ) N75 ° 0 9 ' 1 1 " W 5 9 . 9 2 ' (60. 0 0 ' ) 33.4' 4.0' 4.9' 8.3' 5.5' 11.5'0.7' 0.7'2.2'0.8' 0.7' 0.7'0.8'2.2'9.2'0.8'0.8'38.4'21.2'7.2'11. 1 ' ( T I E )19.8'(TIE)0.8'2.4' (TI E )13.4'5.5' APPARE N TENCROA C H M E N TDRIVEWA Y & WOOD R E T A I N I N G GRAVEL DRIVEWA YWOOD RETAININGWOOD RETAININGAPPAREN T ENCROA C H M E N T R.R. TIE WALL CONCRETE APRON UPPER DECK STEPS FLAGSTO N E PATIO SIDEWALK2 - STOR Y FRAME H O U S E & GARAGE312 WES T H Y M A N A V E N U E 0.137± A C R E S5976± SQ . F T .NEIGHBORING RESIDENCECO N C R E T E C U R B & G U T T E R PAV E D R O A D W A Y MAI L B O X 4.4' APPARE N T ENCROA C H M E N T WOOD R E T A I N I N G OS WN6 7 ° 5 3 ' 3 3 " W 1 2 3 7 . 0 4 ' ( T I E ) CITY OF A S P E N GPS MO N U M E N T # 7 CITY OF A S P E N GPS MO N U M E N T # 6 ELEVATI O N : 7 8 9 3 . 6 1 S86°19' 5 1 " E 8 1 8 . 1 0 ' ( T I E ) 1 2 3 4 5 6 78 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 GARAGE 7901.31 FFE 7901.36 FFE 7901.33 SOUTH 2nd STREET(74.62' WIDE PUBLIC)79047903 790279017901 7901 790179 0 2 7902 79037 9 0 3 7 9 0 4 10' R E A R S E T B A C K - P R I N C I P A L B U I L D I N G 5' R E A R S E T B A C K - P R I N C I P A L B U I L D I N G U S E D A S G A R A G E & A C C E S S O R Y B U I L D I N G 5' MINIMUM SIDE SETBACK5' MINIMUM SIDE SETBACK10' F R O N T S E T B A C K PRI N C I P A L B U I L D I N G 15' F R O N T S E T B A C K AC C E S S O R Y B U I L D I N G CLERK AND RECORDER'S CERTIFICATETHIS PLAT WAS FILED FOR RECORD IN THE OFFICE OF THE CLERK AND RECORDER OF PITKIN COUNTY AT ____O'CLOCK____.M., ON THE ____ DAY OF__________, A.D. 20__, AND IS DULY RECORDED IN BOOK _____,PAGE ______, RECEPTION NO.______________________.______________________________________ CLERK AND RECORDERBY:____________________________________ DEPUTYSURVEYOR'S STATEMENTI, RODNEY P. KISER, DO HEREBY STATE THAT THIS SURVEY WAS PREPARED BY TRUE NORTH COLORADO,LLC. FOR ______________________________________, THAT SAID SURVEY WAS PREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MYSUPERVISION AND RESPONSIBLE CHARGE AND THAT IT IS TRUE AND CORRECT TO THE BEST OF MY BELIEFAND KNOWLEDGE.RODNEY P. KISER, PLS 38215COLORADO PROFESSIONAL SURVEYOR COUNTY SURVEYOR'S CERTIFICATEDEPOSITED THIS _____ DAY OF __________________, 20__, AT________M., IN THE GARFIELD COUNTY INDEX FORINFORMATIONAL LAND SURVEY PLATS UNDER RECEPTION NUMBER _______________________.BY: _____________________________________ GARFIELD COUNTY SURVEYORDATE:____________________________________FILING INFORMATION: SECTION ____, TOWNSHIP ____, RANGE ____, OF THE 6TH P.M. IT IS THE INDIVIDUAL LOT OWNER'S RESPONSIBILITY, ACCORDING TO THE COLORADO NOXIOUS WEED ACT AND GARFIELD COUNTY'S WEED MANAGEMENT PLAN, TO MANAGE ANY NOXIOUS WEEDS ON HIS OR HER PROPERTY. SUBJECT TO PATENT RESERVATIONS, THE MINERAL RIGHTS TO THIS REAL PROPERTY ARE NOT SEVERED FROM THE SURFACE, AND ARE NOT UNDER LEASE. MINERAL RIGHTS: COMMITMENT FOR TITLE INSURANCE ISSUED BY LAND TITLE GUARANTEE COMPANY, ORDER NUMBER ________, DISCLOSES THE FOLLOWING MINERAL RIGHTS: RIGHT OF THE PROPRIETOR OF A VEIN OR LOAD TO EXTRACT OR REMOVE ORE THEREFROM, SHOULD THE SAME BE FOUND TO PENETRATE OR INTERSECT THE PREMISES, AS RESERVED IN UNITED STATES PATENT RECORDED MAY 3, 1921 IN BOOK 73 AT PAGE 126. ONE (1) DOG WILL BE ALLOWED FOR EACH RESIDENTIAL UNIT AND THE DOG SHALL BE REQUIRED TO BE CONFINED WITHIN THE OWNERS' PROPERTY BOUNDARIES. NO OPEN HEARTH SOLID-FUEL FIREPLACES WILL BE ALLOWED ANYWHERE WITHIN THE SUBDIVISION. ONE (1) NEW SOLID-FUEL BURNING STOVE AS DEFINED BY C.R.S. 25-7-401, ET. SEQ., AND THE REGULATIONS PROMULGATED THEREUNDER, WILL BE ALLOWED IN ANY DWELLING UNIT. ALL DWELLING UNITS WILL BE ALLOWED AN UNRESTRICTED NUMBER OF NATURAL GAS BURNING STOVES AND APPLIANCES. ALL EXTERIOR LIGHTING WILL BE THE MINIMUM AMOUNT NECESSARY AND ALL EXTERIOR LIGHTING WILL BE DIRECTED INWARD AND DOWNWARD, TOWARDS THE INTERIOR OF THE SUBDIVISION, EXCEPT THAT PROVISIONS MAY BE MADE TO ALLOW FOR SAFETY LIGHTING THAT GOES BEYOND THE PROPERTY BOUNDARIES. NO FURTHER DIVISIONS OF LAND WITHIN THE SUBDIVISION WILL BE ALLOWED. COLORADO IS A "RIGHT-TO-FARM" STATE PURSUANT TO C.R.S. 35-3-101, ET SEQ. LANDOWNERS, RESIDENTS AND VISITORS MUST BE PREPARED TO ACCEPT THE ACTIVITIES, SIGHTS, SOUNDS AND SMELLS OF GARFIELD COUNTY'S AGRICULTURAL OPERATIONS AS A NORMAL AND NECESSARY ASPECT OF LIVING IN A COUNTY WITH A STRONG RURAL CHARACTER AND A HEALTHY RANCHING SECTOR. ALL MUST BE PREPARED TO ENCOUNTER NOISES, ODOR, LIGHTS, MUD, DUST, SMOKE, CHEMICALS, MACHINERY ON PUBLIC ROADS, LIVESTOCK ON PUBLIC ROADS, STORAGE AND DISPOSAL OF MANURE, AND THE APPLICATION BY SPRAYING OR OTHERWISE OF CHEMICAL FERTILIZERS, SOIL AMENDMENTS, HERBICIDES, AND PESTICIDES, ANY ONE OR MORE OF WHICH MAY NATURALLY OCCUR AS PART OF A LEGAL AND NON-NEGLIGENT AGRICULTURAL OPERATIONS. ALL RESIDENCES OVER 3,600 SQUARE FEET IN SIZE SHALL HAVE AUTOMATIC FIRE SPRINKLERS INSTALLED. INSTALLATION OF THE SPRINKLER SYSTEMS SHALL BE IN ACCORDANCE WITH NFPA 13D, STANDARD FOR THE INSTALLATION OF SPRINKLER SYSTEMS IN ONE AND TWO-FAMILY DWELLINGS AND MANUFACTURED HOMES. ALL ROADWAYS WITHIN THE DEVELOPMENT SHALL BE DEDICATED TO THE PUBLIC AND CONSTRUCTED TO STANDARDS CONSISTENT WITH SECTION 9:00 OF THE SUBDIVISION REGULATIONS OF 1984, AS AMENDED; REPAIR AND MAINTENANCE SHALL BE THE RESPONSIBILITY OF THE HOMEOWNERS ASSOCIATION OF THE SUBDIVISION. TREE TYPE SIZE DRIP TREE CHART 1 DECIDUOUS2 XX"XX' XX"XX' CONIFEROUS Signature Blocks for Pitkin County partial list provided by PlanningDepartment 2010.PITKIN COUNTY HEARING OFFICER APROVALTHIS ACTIVITY ENVELOPE AND SITE PLAN HAS BEEN REVIEWED AND APPROVED BY THE HEARING OFFICER THIS_____ DAY OF ______, 20__, SUBJECT TO THE TERMS AND CONDITIONS OF THE HEARING OFFICERDETERMINATION NO. _______ RECORDED IN THE PITKIN COUNTY CLERK AND RECORDER'S OFFICE AS RECEPTIONNO. ______._________________________________________PITKIN COUNTY HEARING OFFICERPITKIN COUNTY COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DIRECTOR APPROVALTHIS ACTIVITY ENVELOPE AND SITE PLAN HAS BEEN REVIEWED AND APPROVED BY THE COMMUNITYDEVELOPMENT DIRECTOR THIS _____ DAY OF ______, 20__, SUBJECT TO THE TERMS AND CONDITIONS OF THEADMINISTRATIVE DECISION NO. _______ RECORDED IN THE PITKIN COUNTY CLERK AND RECORDER'S OFFICE ASRECEPTION NO. __________.___________________________________COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DIRECTORPITKIN COUNTY BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERSTHIS PLAT OF _____________________ HAS BEEN REVIEWED AND APPROVED BY THE PITKIN COUNTY BOARD OFCOMMISSIONERS THIS _______ DAY OF ______, 20__. APPROVAL OF THIS PLAT IS SUBJECT TO THE TERMS ANDCONDITIONS OF RESOLUTION NUMBER(S) _________ AND RECORDED AT RECEPTION NO. _____. THE DEDICATIONOF ROADS IS ACCEPTED SUBJECT TO THE CONDITIONS THAT PITKIN COUNTY SHALL UNDERTAKE MAINTENANCEOF SUCH ROADS ONLY AFTER CONSTRUCTION OF SUCH ROADS HAS BEEN COMPLETED IN ACCORDANCE WITHPITKIN COUNTY SPECIFICATIONS AND THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS DOES NOT EXTEND TO UTILITIES,WASTE DISPOSAL SYSTEMS, OR ANY SERVICE FACILITIES.____________________________________CHAIRPERSON,BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERSAMENDED PLAT (OR SITE PLAN)APPROVAL AND DEDICATIONTHIS AMENDED PLAT (OR SITE PLAN) OF ___________________ IS HEREBY APPROVED THIS _____ DAY OF _____,20__. SUBJECT TO THE TERMS AND CONDITIONS OF [RESOLUTION, OR ADMINISTRATIVE DECISION, OR HEARINGOFFICER DETERMINATION] NO. _________________. EXCEPT AS MODIFIED BY SUCH [RESOLUTION, ORADMINISTRATIVE DECISION, OR HEARING OFFICER DETERMINATION], THE ORIGINAL PLAT (OR SITE PLAN)RECORDED AT BOOK _____ AND PAGE _____ AND THE CONDITIONS THEREOF REMAIN IN FULL FORCE ANDEFFECT.________________________________PITKIN COUNTY HEARING OFFICER; ORPITKIN COUNTY COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT; ORCHAIRMAN, BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERSCLERK AND RECORDER ACCEPTANCE FOR RECORDINGTHIS ACTIVITY ENVELOPE AND SITE PLAN HAS BEEN ACCEPTED FOR FILING IN THE OFFICE OF THE CLERK &RECORDER OF PITKIN COUNTY, COLORADO, ON THIS _______ DAY OF _______, 20__, IN PLAT BOOK _____ ATPAGE ______.____________________________CLERK AND RECORDERDISCLAIMERENVIRONMENTAL HAZARD AREAS EXIST THAT MIGHT AFFECT THE PROPERTY, ANY IMPROVEMENTS, AND THE USEAND OCCUPANCY HEREOF._________________________________PROPERTY OWNERSURVEYOR'S CERTIFICATEI, _____________________, REGISTERED LAND SURVEYOR, DO HEREBY CERTIFY THAT I HAVE PREPARED THE PLAT OF ____________, THAT THAT LOCATION OF THE OUTSIDE BOUNDARY, ROADS AND OTHER FEATURES ARE ACCURATELY AND CORRECTLY SHOWN HEREON, THAT THE SAME ARE BASED ON FIELD SURVEYS AND THAT THE PLATTED SITE AND ROADS CONFORM TO THOSE STAKED ON THE GROUND. IN WITNESS THEREOF, I HAVE SET MY HAND AND SEAL THIS ______ DAY OF ______, 20__. ________________________________ SURVEYOR DEDICATION OF RIGHTS-OF-WAY FOR UTILITY PURPOSES UNLESS OTHERWISE SPECIFIED, ALL UTILITY EASEMENTS, AS WELL AS PUBLIC AND PRIVATE RIGHTS-OF-WAY, SHOW HEREON, ARE DEDICATED TO THE PERPETUAL USE OF ALL UTILITY COMPANIES FOR THE PURPOSE OF INSTALLING, CONSTRUCTING, REPLACING, REPAIRING, AND MAINTAINING UNDERGROUND UTILITIES AND DRAINAGE FACILITIES, INCLUDING (BUT NOT LIMITED TO) WATER, SEWER, ELECTRIC, GAS, TELEPHONE AND TELEVISION LINES; TOGETHER WITH THE RIGHT OF INGRESS AND EGRESS FOR SUCH INSTALLATION, CONSTRUCTION, REPLACEMENT, REPAIR AND MAINTENANCE, AS WELL AS THE RIGHT TO TRIM INTERFERING TREES AND BRUSH. IN NO EVENT SHALL THE UTILITY COMPANIES EXERCISE THE RIGHTS HEREIN GRANTED SO AS TO INTERFERE WITH THE USE OF THE RIGHT-OF-WAY FOR ROADWAY PURPOSES EXCEPT TO THE EXTENT REASONABLY NECESSARY TO ENJOY THE GRANT HEREBY MADE. IMPROVEMENT SURVEY STATEMENTI HEREBY STATE THAT THIS IMPROVEMENT SURVEY WAS PREPARED BY TRUE NORTH COLORADO, LLC FOR______________________.I FURTHER STATE THAT THE IMPROVEMENTS ON THE ABOVE DESCRIBED PARCEL ON THIS DATE,__________________________, EXCEPT UTILITY CONNECTIONS, ARE ENTIRELY WITHIN THE BOUNDARIES OF THEPARCEL, EXCEPT AS SHOWN, THAT THERE ARE NO ENCROACHMENTS UPON THE DESCRIBED PREMISES BYIMPROVEMENTS ON ANY ADJOINING PREMISES, EXCEPT AS INDICATED, AND THAT THERE IS NO APPARENTEVIDENCE OR SIGN OF ANY EASEMENT CROSSING OR BURDENING ANY PART OF SAID PARCEL, EXCEPT ASNOTED. LINER ERROR OF CLOSURE IS LESS THAN 1:10,000. RODNEY P. KISER, PLS 38215 COLORADO PROFESSIONAL SURVEYOR GARFIELD GENERAL PLAT NOTES 2009 CHECK REGS FOR UPDATES. LIENHOLDER CONSENT AND SUBORDINATION THE UNDERSIGNED, BEING THE BENEFICIARY UNDER A DEED OF TRUST GRANTED BY THE OWNER(S) UPON THE REAL PROPERTY PLATTED AND DIVIDED AS SHOWN UPON THE WITHIN FINAL PLAT OF __________________________SUBDIVISION, CERTIFIES THAT THE UNDERSIGNED HAS REVIEWED THE FINAL PLAT OF ___________________ SUBDIVISION AND BY THIS CERTIFICATION HEREBY CONSENTS TO SAID FINAL PLAT OF _______________ SUBDIVISION AND TO THE RECORDING THEREOF. BENEFICIARY FURTHER CONSENTS TO SAID FINAL PLAT OF __________________ SUBDIVISION AS STATED IN THE CERTIFICATE OF DEDICATION AND OWNERSHIP EXECUTED BY THE OWNER(S) HEREON, AND HEREBY SUBORDINATES ANY INTEREST THAT BENEFICIARY MAY HAVE IN AND TO THE PROPERTY SUBJECT TO SUCH DEDICATION, TO THE ENTITY(IES) OR THE GENERAL PUBLIC TO WHICH SUCH DEDICATION IS MADE. EXECUTED THIS _______ DAY OF _________________, A.D., 20__. MORTGAGE OR BANK NAME BY:________________________________ STATE OF______________ ) ) SS COUNTY OF ____________ ) THE FOREGOING LIENHOLDER CONSENT AND SUBORDINATION WAS ACKNOWLEDGED BEFORE ME THIS ____ DAY OF ___________________, 20__, BY ______________________. MY COMMISSION EXPIRES:________________________ WITNESS MY HAND AND SEAL: _____________________________ NOTARY PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT SURVEY PLAT GARFIELD COUNTY PLAT CERTS PITKIN PLAT CERTS SURVEYOR'S CERTIFICATE I, RODNEY P. KISER, DO HEREBY CERTIFY THAT I AM A PROFESSIONAL LAND SURVEYOR LICENSED UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF COLORADO, THAT THIS FINAL PLAT IS A TRUE, CORRECT AND COMPLETE PLAT OF ____________________________, AS LAID OUT, PLATTED, DEDICATED AND SHOWN HEREON, THAT SUCH PLAT WAS MADE FROM AN ACCURATE SURVEY OF SAID PROPERTY BY ME AND UNDER MY SUPERVISION AND CORRECTLY SHOWS THE LOCATION AND DIMENSIONS OF THE LOTS, EASEMENTS AND STREETS OF ______________________ AS THE SAME ARE STAKED UPON THE GROUND IN COMPLIANCE WITH APPLICABLE REGULATIONS GOVERNING THE SUBDIVISION OF LAND. IN WITNESS WHEREOF I HAVE SET MY HAND AND SEAL THIS ____ DAY OF _______________, 20__. BY:_____________________________________ RODNEY P. KISER, PLS 38215 BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS CERTIFICATE THIS FINAL PLAT OF ____________________ IS APPROVED BY THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF GARFIELD COUNTY, COLORADO THIS ________ DAY OF _____________, 20__, FOR FILING WITH THE CLERK AND RECORDER OF GARFIELD COUNTY AND FOR CONVEYANCE TO THE COUNTY OF THE PUBLIC DEDICATIONS SHOWN HEREON, SUBJECT TO THE PROVISION THAT APPROVAL IN NO WAY OBLIGATES GARFIELD COUNTY FOR FINANCING OR CONSTRUCTION OF IMPROVEMENTS ON LANDS, PUBLIC ROADS, HIGHWAYS OR EASEMENTS DEDICATED TO THE PUBLIC, EXCEPT AS SPECIFICALLY AGREED TO BY THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS BY SUBSEQUENT RESOLUTION. THIS APPROVAL SHALL IN NO WAY OBLIGATE GARFIELD COUNTY FOR THE CONSTRUCTION, REPAIR OR MAINTENANCE OF PUBLIC ROADS, HIGHWAYS OR ANY OTHER PUBLIC DEDICATIONS SHOWN HEREON. BY:____________________________________ CHAIRMAN, BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS GARFIELD COUNTY, COLORADO WITNESS MY HAND AND THE SEAL OF THE COUNTY OF GARFIELD. ATTEST:_______________________________ COUNTY CLERK CERTIFICATE OF OWNERSHIP THE UNDERSIGNED _______________________, BEING SOLE OWNER(S) IN FEE SIMPLE OF ALL THAT REAL PROPERTY SITUATED IN GARFIELD COUNTY, DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: "INSERT PROPERTY DESCRIPTION" CONTAINING _____ ACRES, MORE OR LESS, HAVE CAUSED THE DESCRIBED REAL PROPERTY TO BE SURVEYED, LAID OUT, PLATTED AND SUBDIVIDED INTO LOTS AND BLOCKS AS SHOWN ON THIS FINAL PLAT UNDER THE NAME AND STYLE OF ___________________, A SUBDIVISION IN COUNTY OF GARFIELD. EXECUTED THIS ____ DAY OF _________________. A.D., 20__. OWNER: name and address STATE OF COLORADO ) )ss COUNTY OF GARFIELD ) THE FOREGOING CERTIFICATION OF OWNERSHIP WAS ACKNOWLEDGED BEFORE ME THIS _______ DAY OF_________________, 20__, BY_____________________. MY COMMISSION EXPIRES:________________________ WITNESS MY HAND AND SEAL __________________________________ NOTARY PUBLIC CERTIFICATE OF TAXES PAID I, THE UNDERSIGNED, DO HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THE ENTIRE AMOUNT OF TAXES AND ASSESSMENTS DUE AND PAYABLE AS OF______________, UPON ALL PARCELS OF REAL ESTATE DESCRIBED ON THIS PLAT ARE PAID FULL. DATED THIS _____ DAY OF _________________, A.D., 20__. BY:_________________________________ TREASURER OF GARFIELD COUNTY TITLE CERTIFICATE I, ___________________________________, AN ATTORNEY LICENSED TO PRACTICE LAW IN THE STATE OF COLORADO, OR AGENT AUTHORIZED BY A TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY, DO HEREBY CERTIFY THAT I HAVE EXAMINED THE TITLE TO ALL LANDS SHOWN UPON THIS PLAT AND THAT TITLE TO SUCH LANDS IS VESTED IN BERKELEY FAMILY LIMITED PARTNERSHIP, FREE AND CLEAR OF ALL LIENS AND ENCUMBRANCES (INCLUDING MORTGAGES, DEEDS OF TRUST, JUDGMENTS, EASEMENTS, CONTRACTS AND AGREEMENTS OF RECORD AFFECTING THE REAL PROPERTY IN THIS PLAT), EXCEPT AS FOLLOWS: ______________________________________________________________________ ______________________________________________________________________ ______________________________________________________________________ ______________________________________________________________________ ______________________________________________________________________ ______________________________________________________________________ ______________________________________________________________________ ______________________________________________________________________ ______________________________________________________________________ ______________________________________________________________________. DATED THIS_______DAY OF_____________, A.D., 20__. TITLE COMPANY: ____________________________________ ____________________________________ AGENT OR BY:________________________________________ ATTORNEY COLORADO ATTORNEY REGISTRATION NO.___________ WV ELECTRICAL TRANSFORMER SANITARY CLEAN-OUT WATER VALVE TELEPHONE PEDESTAL ELECTRIC PEDESTAL SET NO. 5 REBAR & CAP L.S. NO. 38215 CATV PEDESTAL FOUND PROPERTY CORNER AS DESCRIBED DYH OSW GV S D W UTILITY POLE/POWER POLE GUY ANCHOR TELEPHONE VAULT ELECTRICAL VAULT LIGHT POLE STREET SIGN HANDICAP PARKING DECIDUOUS TREE CONIFEROUS TREE FIRE HYDRANT WATER SHUTOFF GAS VALVE SANITARY MANHOLE STORM SEWER MANHOLE ELECTRIC MANHOLE WELL 1/16 AND SMALLER, TRACT, HES, MS COR. SECTION CORNER 1/4 OR 1/16 COR. CENTER 1/4 COR WATER MANHOLE E T WATER METER GAS METER ELECTRICAL METER G TELEPHONE MANHOLET ELECTRIC MARKER GAS MARKER ELECTRICAL OUTLET LANDSCAPE LIGHT IRRIGATION VALVE BOX G W IVB DRY WELL VICINITY MAP TELEPHONE WATER W SANITARY - STORM CURB INLET CATCH BASIN GAS ELECTRIC E E E SIGNS TREES BUSH DECIDUOUS TREE PROPERTY MARKERS SATELLITE DISH FLAG POLE IMPROVEMENT LOCATION CERTIFICATEI HEREBY STATE THAT THIS IMPROVEMENT LOCATION CERTIFICATE WAS PREPARED BY TRUE NORTH COLORADO, LLCFOR _______________________, THAT IT IS NOT A LAND SURVEY PLAT OR AN IMPROVEMENT SURVEY PLAT, AND THAT ITIS NOT TO BE RELIED UPON FOR THE ESTABLISHMENT OF FENCE, BUILDING, OR OTHER FUTURE IMPROVEMENT LINES.I FURTHER STATE THAT THE IMPROVEMENTS ON THE ABOVE DESCRIBED PARCEL ON THIS DATE OF __________________,20__, EXCEPT UTILITY CONNECTIONS, ARE ENTIRELY WITHIN THE BOUNDARIES OF THE PARCEL, EXCEPT AS SHOWN,THAT THERE ARE NO ENCROACHMENTS UPON THE DESCRIBED PREMISES BY IMPROVEMENTS ON ANY ADJOININGPREMISES, EXCEPT AS INDICATED, AND THAT THERE IS NO APPARENT EVIDENCE OR SIGN OF ANY EASEMENTCROSSING OR BURDENING ANY PART OF SAID PARCEL, EXCEPT AS NOTED.RODNEY P. KISER, PLS 38215COLORADO PROFESSIONAL SURVEYOR COUNTY SURVEYOR'S CERTIFICATE APPROVED FOR CONTENT AND FORM ONLY AND NOT THE ACCURACY OF SURVEYS, CALCULATIONS AND DRAFTING PURSUANT TO C.R.S., 38-51-101 AND 102, ET SEQ. DATED THIS _____ DAY OF ______________, 20__. BY:___________________________________ GARFIELD COUNTY SURVEYOR WATER LINE SEWER LINE TELEPHONE LINE FIBER OPTIC LINE GAS LINE OVERHEAD ELECTRIC LINE SILT FENCE LINE FENCE LINE CATV LINE UTILITY LINES ORF REV I E W PRELIMINARY FLOOD ZONE STATEMENTA PORTION OF THIS PROPERTY LIES WITH FLOOD ZONE A ACCORDING TO FEMA FLOODINSURANCE RATE MAP COMMUNITY PANEL NO. 08097C0066 C, HAVING AN EFFECTIVE DATEOF JUNE 4, 1987, THE STRUCTURE, HOWEVER LIES OUTSIDE OF SAID FLOOD ZONE A ASSHOWN HEREON.LAND SURVEY DEPOSITMESA COUNTY SURVEYOR'S OFFICEDATE:__________________________BOOK NO:_________, PAGE:_________DEPOSIT NO:______________________AS-BUILT SURVEY CERTIFICATION STATEMENT"I, THE UNDERSIGNED REGISTERED LAND SURVEYOR, HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THE ELEVATIONS, GRADING ANDDRAINAGE FEATURES SHOWN OF THE PROPERTY DESCRIBED AS XXXXXXXXXXX WERE DEVELOPED FROM SURVEYINGTHE PROPERTY ON THE DATE OF:XXXXXXXXXXXXX AND ACCURATELY DEPICT THE ELEVATIONS EXISTING DURING THESURVEY. THE ELEVATIONS MAY CHANGE SUBSEQUENT TO THE SURVEY DUE TO SUBSIDENCE, UPHEAVAL, EROSION,ACTS OF MAN OR OTHER FACTORS. THEREFORE, THIS CERTIFICATE MAY NOT ACCURATELY DEPICT ELEVATIONS,GRADING AND DRAINAGE PATTERN AFTER THE DATE OF THE SURVEY. EASEMENTS ARE SHOWN PER THE PLAT UNLESSNOTED OTHERWISE. NO PART OF THIS LIES WITHIN THE 100-YEAR FLOODPLAIN AS DEFINED BY FEMA, EXCEPT ASNOTED." RODNEY P. KISER, PLS 38215 FOR AND BEHALF OF:XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX.CLERK AND RECORDER'S CERTIFICATETHIS ACTIVITY ENVELOPE AND SITE PLAN HAS BEEN ACCEPTED FOR RECORDING IN THE OFFICE OF THECLERK AND RECORDER OF PITKIN COUNTY, COLORADO THIS ____ DAY OF __________, 2015, PLAT BOOK_____, PAGE ______, AS RECEPTION NO.________________.______________________________________ CLERK AND RECORDERBY:____________________________________ DEPUTYPITKIN COUNTY COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENTDIRECTOR'S APPROVALTHIS ACTIVITY ENVELOPE AND SITE PLAN HAS BEEN REVIEWED AND APPROVED BY THE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENTDIRECTOR OF PITKIN COUNTY THIS _____ DAY OF ______, 2015 AND HAS BEEN PREPARED PURSUANT TOADMINISTRATIVE DECISION NO. ________, RECORDED AS RECEPTION NO. ___________._______________________________________CINDY HOUBEN - COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DIRECTOROWNER'S ACKNOWLEDGMENTTHE OWNER ACKNOWLEDGES BEING INFORMED BY PITKIN COUNTY OF THE EXISTENCE OF "ENVIRONMENTALHAZARD AREAS" THAT MIGHT AFFECT THE PROPERTY, ANY IMPROVEMENTS, AND THE USE THEREOF. THENPROVISIONS OF THE PITKIN COUNTY REGULATIONS DO NOT IN ANY WAY ASSURE OR IMPLY THAT THE AREASOUTSIDE OF DESIGNATED HAZARD AREAS WILL BE FREE FROM HAZARDS OR THAT APPROVED MITIGATIONMEASURES WILL GUARANTEE THE SAFETY OF THE PROPERTY.(OWNER)BY:_______________________________________OWNER'S CERTIFICATEKNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS, THAT ____________, BEING THE OWNER(s) IN FEE SIMPLE OF THELANDS SHOWN HEREON AND DOES HEREBY ESTABLISH THE SITE PLAN SET FORTH HEREON. (OWNER) BY: ____________________________ ROCK WALL CO DW UNDERGROUND ELECTRIC LINE TOPOGRAPHIC SURVEYEXISTING CONDITIONS SURVEYALTA/NSPS LAND TITLE SURVEYCITY OF ASPENSURVEYOR'S CERTIFICATIONI, RODNEY P. KISER, HEREBY CERTIFY TO XXXXXXXXXX, THAT THIS IS AN "IMPROVEMENT SURVEY PLAT" ASDEFINED BY C.R.S.38-51-102(9) AND THAT IT IS A MONUMENTED LAND SURVEY SHOWING THE LOCATION OFALL STRUCTURES, VISIBLE UTILITIES, FENCES, HEDGES, OR WALLS SITUATED ON THE DESCRIBED PARCEL ANDWITHIN FIVE FEET OF ALL BOUNDARIES OF SUCH PARCEL, ANY CONFLICTING BOUNDARY EVIDENCE OR VISIBLEENCROACHMENTS, AND ALL EASEMENTS, UNDERGROUND UTILITIES, AND TUNNELS DESCRIBED IN THE TITLECOMPANY'S COMMITMENT FOR TITLE INSURANCE ORDER NO. 01330-73339, OR OTHER SOURCES ASSPECIFIED ON THE IMPROVEMENT SURVEY PLAT.RODNEY P. KISER, PLS NO. 38215COLORADO PROFESSIONAL LAND SURVEYOR NOTES: BASIS OF BEARINGS FOR THIS SURVEY IS A BEARING OF S26°12'00"E ALONG THE EASTERLY PROPERTY LINEBETWEEN THE NORTHEAST CORNER A FOUND ALUMINUM CAP LS17664 AND THE SOUTHEAST CORNER A SETREBAR AND YELLOW PLASTIC CAP LS38215 AS SHOWN HEREON. BASIS OF BEARING FOR THIS SURVEY ARE BASED ON TRUE NORTH FROM GPS OBSERVATIONS YIELDING ABEARING OF XXXXXXXXX. DATE OF FIELD SURVEY: JANUARY 28 2016, AT THE TIME OF THE SURVEY THERE WAS 2-4 FEET OF SNOW ONTHE GROUND. LINEAR UNITS USED TO PERFORM THIS SURVEY WERE U.S. SURVEY FEET. THIS SURVEY IS BASED ON THE DIVIDE RECORDED AUGUST 28, 1989 IN PLAT BOOK 23 AT PAGE 27 ANDCORNERS FOUND IN PLACE AS SHOWN HEREON. THIS IMPROVEMENT SURVEY PLAT DOES NOT CONSTITUTE A TITLE SEARCH BY TRUE NORTH COLORADO, LLCFOR ALL INFORMATION REGARDING EASEMENT, RIGHTS-OF-WAY AND/OR TITLE OF RECORD, TRUE NORTHCOLORADO, LLC. RELIED UPON TITLE COMMITMENT NO. XXXXXXXXXXXX ISSUED BY XXXXXXXXXXXXX,EFFECTIVE DATE: XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX THIS PROPERTY IS SUBJECT TO RESERVATIONS, RESTRICTIONS, COVENANTS AND EASEMENTS OF RECORDOR IN PLACE. THIS SURVEY WAS PREPARED WITHOUT THE BENEFIT OF A TITLE COMMITMENT, THEREFORE, ANYEXCEPTIONS TO TITLE THAT MAY AFFECT THE SUBJECT PROPERTY HAVE NOT BEEN RESEARCHED BY TRUENORTH COLORADO, LLC. ELEVATIONS SHOWN HEREON ARE BASED ON NORTH AMERICAN VERTICAL DATUM OF 1988 (NAVD 88)REFERENCED FROM NATIONAL GEODETIC SURVEY (NGS) BENCHMARK STATION S 159 HAVING AN ELEVATIONOF 7720.88. ELEVATIONS SHOWN HEREON ARE BASED ON GPS OBSERVATIONS UTILIZING THE CONTINUOUS OPERATINGREFERENCE STATIONS (CORS) THROUGH THE MESA COUNTY RTVRN NETWORK BROAD CASTING NORTHAMERICAN VERTICAL DATUM (NAVD88) YIELDING AN ON-SITE ELEVATION OF XXXXXX ELEVATIONS SHOWN HEREON WERE DERIVED FROM GPS OBSERVATIONS ON XX-XX-XXXX AND ARE BASEDON NORTH AMERICAN VERTICAL DATUM OF 1988 (NAVD88) WHICH DATA WAS OBTAINED FROM THE NATIONALGEODETIC SURVEY ONLINE POSITIONING USER SERVICE (OPUS). CONTOUR INTERVAL EQUALS 1 FOOT. UNDERGROUND UTILITIES HAVE BEEN MARKED OUT BY OTHERS, ONLY PAINT MARKS AND UTILITY FLAGSHAVE BEEN LOCATED BY TRUE NORTH COLORADO, LLC. THE ACTUAL LOCATION OF UNDERGROUND UTILITIESMUST BE FIELD VERIFIED PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION. SLOPES SHOWN HEREON ARE BASED ON TOPOGRAPHIC SURVEY DATA COLLECTED IN THE FIELD ON APRIL 25& 26, 2018 WHICH HAS BEEN CLASSIFIED INTO SLOPES OF 30% TO 40% AND AREAS WITH SLOPES GREATERTHAN 40% USING A COMPUTER ANALYSIS MEASURED BETWEEN EACH CONTOUR INTERVAL. UNDERGROUND UTILITIES SHOWN HEREON (GAS, ELECTRIC, CATV & TELEPHONE) WERE LOCATED BYROARING FORK UTILITY LOCATORS LLC. WATER & SEWER SERVICES WERE TAKEN FROM THE RECORDEDPLAT OF MOSES LOT SPLIT. UTILITIES SHOWN HEREON ARE FOR PLANNING PURPOSES ONLY. PLEASE CALL811 PRIOR TO ANY DIGGING OR EARTHWORK CONSTRUCTION FOR UTILITY VERIFICATION. SURVEYOR'S STATEMENT (LAND SURVEY PLAT)I, RODNEY P. KISER, DO HEREBY STATE THAT THIS SURVEY WAS PREPARED BY TRUE NORTH COLORADO, LLC FOR______________________________________, THAT SAID FIELD SURVEY WAS PERFORMED UNDER MY SUPERVISION ANDRESPONSIBLE CHARGE AND THAT THIS SURVEY MEETS THE REQUIREMENTS OF A LAND SURVEY PLAT AS SET FORTHIN C.R.S. SECTION 38-51-106 AND IS TRUE AND CORRECT TO THE BEST OF MY BELIEF AND KNOWLEDGE. RODNEY P. KISER, PLS 38215 COLORADO PROFESSIONAL LAND SURVEYOR TELEPHONE PEDESTAL GAS METER ELECTRICAL METER G LEGEND E SURVEYOR'S CERTIFICATION I, RODNEY P. KISER, HEREBY CERTIFY TO HENRY LAMBERT & CAREY BOND THAT THIS IS AN "IMPROVEMENT SURVEY PLAT" AS DEFINED BY C.R.S.38-51-102(9) AND THAT IT IS A MONUMENTED LAND SURVEY PERFORMED UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION AND RESPONSIBLE CHARGE SHOWING THE LOCATION OF ALL STRUCTURES, VISIBLE UTILITIES, FENCES, HEDGES, OR WALLS SITUATED ON THE DESCRIBED PARCEL AND WITHIN FIVE FEET OF ALL BOUNDARIES OF SUCH PARCEL, ANY CONFLICTING BOUNDARY EVIDENCE OR VISIBLE ENCROACHMENTS, AND ALL EASEMENTS, UNDERGROUND UTILITIES, AND TUNNELS DESCRIBED IN THE ATTORNEYS TITLE INSURANCE AGENCY OF ASPEN, LLC COMMITMENT FOR TITLE INSURANCE COMMITMENT NO. 18003943, OR OTHER SOURCES AS SPECIFIED ON THE IMPROVEMENT SURVEY PLAT. LINEAR ERROR OF CLOSURE IS LEES THAN 1:15,000. RODNEY P. KISER LICENSED PROFESSIONAL LAND SURVEYOR COLORADO REGISTRATION NO. 38215 SURVEY NOTES: 1. BASIS OF BEARINGS FOR THIS SURVEY IS A BEARING OF N75°09'11"W BETWEEN A FOUND NO. 5 REBARS AS SHOWN HEREON. 2. DATE OF FIELD SURVEY: JANUARY 15, 2019 AND JANUARY 25, 2019. AT THE TIME OF THE FIELD SURVEY THERE WAS 4"+ OF SNOW ON THE GROUND. 3. LINEAR UNITS USED TO PERFORM THIS SURVEY WERE U.S. SURVEY FEET. 4. THIS SURVEY IS BASED ON THE OFFICIAL MAP OF THE CITY OF ASPEN DATED DECEMBER 18, 1959 AS RECEPTION NO. 109043, THE PLAT OF RESUBDIVIDED LOTS K, L, M, N, O, BLOCK 46 RECORDED JANUARY 15, 1982 IN PLAT BOOK 12 AT PAGE 54 AND CORNERS FOUND IN PLACE AS SHOWN HEREON. 5. THIS IMPROVEMENT SURVEY PLAT DOES NOT CONSTITUTE A TITLE SEARCH BY TRUE NORTH COLORADO, LLC, FOR ALL INFORMATION REGARDING EASEMENT, RIGHTS-OF-WAY AND/OR TITLE OF RECORD, TRUE NORTH COLORADO, LLC. RELIED UPON TITLE COMMITMENT NO. 18003943 ISSUED BY ATTORNEYS TITLE INSURANCE AGENCY OF ASPEN, LLC, EFFECTIVE DATE: JANUARY 22, 2019. 6. BEARINGS AND DISTANCES SHOWN HEREON ARE BASED ON FIELD MEASUREMENTS. BEARINGS AND DISTANCES SHOWN IN PARENTHESIS ARE OF RECORD SHOWN ON THE OFFICIAL MAP OF THE CITY OF ASPEN DATED NOVEMBER 16, 1959. 7. THE SUBJECT PROPERTY LIES WITHIN FLOOD ZONE X WHICH ARE AREAS DETERMINED TO BE OUTSIDE THE 500-YEAR FLOOD PLAIN) ACCORDING TO FEMA FLOOD INSURANCE RATE MAP COMMUNITY PANEL NO. 08097C0203C WITH AN EFFECTIVE DATE OF JUNE 4, 1987. 8. THERE ARE NO NATURAL HAZARDS THAT EXIST ON THE SUBJECT PROPERTY. 9. NATURAL SLOPES ARE BETWEEN 0% TO 15% OVER THE ENTIRE SITE. 10. BASED ON 1958 CITY OF ASPEN TOPOGRAPHY THE SUBJECT PROPERTY DOES NOT APPEAR TO BE MANIPULATED FROM HISTORIC GRADE. LOTS P & Q - BLOCK 46, CITY AND TOWNSITE OF ASPEN SECTION 12, TOWNSHIP 10 SOUTH, RANGE 85 WEST OF THE 6TH PM COUNTY OF PITKIN, STATE OF COLORADO IMPROVEMENT & TOPOGRAPHICSURVEY PLAT YEARS FROM THE DATE OF CERTIFICATION SHOWN HEREON. AFTER YOU FIRST DISCOVER SUCH DEFECT. IN NO EVENT MAY ANY ACTION ACTION BASED UPON ANY DEFECT IN THIS SURVEY WITHIN THREE YEARS BASED UPON ANY DEFECT IN THIS SURVEY BE COMMENCED MORE THAN TEN NOTICE: ACCORDING TO COLORADO LAW YOU MUST COMMENCE ANY LEGAL TRUE NORTH COLORADO LLC. A LAND SURVEYING AND MAPPING COMPANY PO BOX 614 - 529 S. WILD HORSE DRIVE NEW CASTLE, COLORADO 81647 (970) 984-0474 www.truenorthcolorado.com PROJECT NO: 2019-115 DATE: FEBRUARY 1, 2019 DRAWN RPK SURVEYED LDV SHEET 1 OF 1 TRUE NORTH COLORADO A LAND SURVEYING AND MAPPING COMPANY HENRY LAMBERT & CAREY BOND IMPROVEMENT & TOPOGRAPHIC SURVEY PLAT LOTS P & Q - BLOCK 46 CITY OF ASPEN COUNTY OF PITKIN - STATE OF COLORADO 8'4'16' SCALE: 1" = 8' N PROPERTY DESCRIPTION: LOTS P AND Q, BLOCK 46, CITY AND TOWNSITE OF ASPEN. COUNTY OF PITKIN STATE OF COLORADO 0 ACCESS & UTILITY EASEMENT SECTION 22, TOWNSHIP 9 SOUTH,RANGE 86 WEST OF THE 6TH P.M.COUNTY OF PITKIN, STATE OF COLORADOACCESS & UTILITY EASEMENTA STRIP OF LAND SITUATED IN SECTION 22, TOWNSHIP 9 SOUTH, RANGE 86 WEST OF THE SIXTH PRINCIPAL MERIDIAN, COUNTY OFPITKIN, STATE OF COLORADO; SAID STRIP OF LAND LYING TEN FEET (10') ON EACH SIDE OF THE FOLLOWING DESCRIBEDCENTERLINE:COMMENCING AT THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF SAID SECTION 22; THENCE N56°56'19"E A DISTANCE OF 2145.08 FEET TO THE POINTOF BEGINNING; THENCE ALONG SAID CENTERLINE THE FOLLOWING THREE (3) COURSES:1.) S89°17'34"W A DISTANCE OF 44.87 FEET;2.) S62°48'55"W A DISTANCE OF 22.45 FEET;3.) S45°23'26"W A DISTANCE OF 76.76 FEET TO THE POINT OF TERMINUS; (WHENCE THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF SAID SECTION 22BEARS: S56°37'35"W A DISTANCE OF 2009.67 FEET); SAID STRIP OF LAND CONTAINS 2,878 SQUARE FEET MORE OR LESS.PROJECT NO: 2017-160DATE: JULY 13, 2017 DRAWNRPKSURVEYEDLDV SHEET1 OF 1V. HAWLEY SMITHSECTION 22, TOWNSHIP 9 SOUTH, RANGE 86 WEST OF 6TH P.M.COUNTY OF PITKIN, STATE OF COLORADOTRUENORTHCOLORADOA LAND SURVEYING AND MAPPING COMPANY SCALE: 1" = 30'NACCESS & UTILITY EASEMENTA STRIP OF LAND SITUATED IN SECTION 22, TOWNSHIP 9 SOUTH, RANGE 86 WEST OF THE SIXTH PRINCIPAL MERIDIAN, COUNTY OFPITKIN, STATE OF COLORADO; SAID STRIP OF LAND LYING TEN FEET (10') ON EACH SIDE OF THE FOLLOWING DESCRIBEDCENTERLINE:COMMENCING AT THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF SAID SECTION 22; THENCE N56°56'19"E A DISTANCE OF 2145.08 FEET TO THE POINTOF BEGINNING; THENCE ALONG SAID CENTERLINE THE FOLLOWING THREE (3) COURSES:1.) S89°17'34"W A DISTANCE OF 44.87 FEET;2.) S62°48'55"W A DISTANCE OF 22.45 FEET;3.) S45°23'26"W A DISTANCE OF 76.76 FEET TO THE POINT OF TERMINUS; (WHENCE THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF SAID SECTION 22BEARS: S56°37'35"W A DISTANCE OF 2009.67 FEET); SAID STRIP OF LAND CONTAINS 2,878 SQUARE FEET MORE OR LESS.PROJECT NO: 2017-160DATE: JULY 13, 2017 DRAWNRPKSURVEYEDLDV SHEET1 OF 1V. HAWLEY SMITHSECTION 22, TOWNSHIP 9 SOUTH, RANGE 86 WEST OF 6TH P.M.COUNTY OF PITKIN, STATE OF COLORADOTRUENORTHCOLORADOA LAND SURVEYING AND MAPPING COMPANYPROJECT NO: 2017-104DATE: December 13, 2017TRUENORTHCOLORADOA LAND SURVEYING AND MAPPING COMPANY DRAWING NO.TITLEIMPROVEMENT &TOPOGRAPHICSURVEYV-1 DATE REVISIONGUNNISON COUNTY CLERK AND RECORDER'S ACCEPTANCETHIS SURVEY WAS ACCEPTED FOR DEPOSIT IN THE OFFICE OF THE CLERK AND RECORDER OF GUNNISON COUNTY,COLORADO ON THIS DAY OF __________________________________, 2018, DEPOSITNUMBER______________________________.TIME:_________________________________________, DATE:_____________________________.______________________________________________________________________________ GUNNISON COUNTY CLERK AND RECORDEREAGLE COUNTY SURVEYOR'S CERTIFICATEDEPOSITED THIS _____ DAY OF ____________________, 2018, AT _________.M. IN BOOK _____ OF THEEAGLE COUNTY SURVEYOR'S LAND SURVEY PLATS/RIGHTS-OF-WAY SURVEYS AT PAGE ________. THISLAND SURVEY PLAT COMPLIES WITH SECTION 38-51-106(1), OF THE COLORADO REVISED STATUTES.____________________________________________________________________________________COUNTY SURVEYORBILL SURVEYOR'S NOTES1. THIS SURVEY DOES NOT CONSTITUTE A TITLE SEARCH BY THIS SURVEYOR OF THEPROPERTY SHOWN AND DESCRIBED HEREON TO DETERMINE:A. OWNERSHIP OF THE TRACT OF LANDB. COMPATIBILITY OF THIS DESCRIPTION WITH THOSE OF ADJOINERSC. RIGHT'S-OF WAY, EASEMENTS AND ENCUMBRANCES OF RECORD AFFECTING THIS PARCEL.6. THIS ALTA/ACSM LAND TITLE SURVEY DOES NOT CONSTITUTE A TITLE SEARCH BY HIGH COUNTRYENGINEERING, INC. FOR ALL INFORMATION REGARDING EASEMENTS, RIGHTS 0F WAY AND/OR TITLE OFRECORD, HIGH COUNTRY ENGINEERING, INC. RELIED UPON TITLE COMMITMENT PCT25114W4 ISSUED BYWESTCOR LAND TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY, EFFECTIVE NOVEMBER 16, 2017.7. ANY PERSON WHO KNOWINGLY REMOVES, ALTERS OR DEFACES ANY PUBLIC LAND SURVEYMONUMENT OR LAND BOUNDARY MONUMENT OR ACCESSORY COMMITS A CLASS TWO (2)MISDEMEANOR PURSUANT TO SECTION 18-4-508 OF THE COLORADO REVISED STATUTES.8. ALL DIMENSIONS AND COURSES ARE AS MEASURED IN THE FIELD UNLESS DENOTED INPARENTHESIS, WHICH DENOTE THE BOUNDARIES OF RECORD ON THE ORIGINAL PLAT OF THE FIRSTAMENDED SUBDIVISION EXEMPTION PLAT AND 1041 HAZARD REVIEW SITE PLAN OF CHAPARRAL ASPENRECORDED OCTOBER 15, 2002 IN PLAT BOOK 62 AT PAGE 101 AS RECEPTION NO. 473441, ANIMPROVEMENT SURVEY PREPARED BY HIGH COUNTRY ENGINEERING, INC. DATED NOVEMBER 13, 2006 ANDCORNERS FOUND IN PLACE AS SHOWN. COUNTY, STATE OF COLORADO.9. THE WORD "CERTIFY" AS SHOWN AND USED HEREON MEANS AN EXPRESSION OFPROFESSIONAL OPINION REGARDING THE FACTS OF THE SURVEY, AS BASED UPON THEEVIDENCE PRESENTED HEREON, AND DOES NOT CONSTITUTE A WARRANTY OR GUARANTEE,EXPRESSED OR IMPLIED.10. NOTICE: THIS PLAT AND THE INFORMATION SHOWN HEREON MAY NOT BE USED FOR ANYADDITIONAL OR EXTENDED PURPOSE BEYOND THAT FOR WHICH IT WAS INTENDED AND MAY NOTBE USED BY ANY PARTIES OTHER THAN THOSE TO WHICH IT IS CERTIFIED. THIS DOCUMENT ANDTHE WORK IT REPRESENTS IS THE PROPERTY OF HIGH COUNTRY ENGINEERING, INC. NO PARTOF THIS DOCUMENT MAY BE STORED, REPRODUCED, DISTRIBUTED OR USED TO PREPAREDERIVATIVE PRODUCTS WITHOUT PRIOR WRITTEN PERMISSION. AN ORIGINAL SEAL AND ORIGINALSIGNATURE IS REQUIRED TO VALIDATE THIS DOCUMENT AND IS EXCLUSIVE TO HIGH COUNTRYENGINEERING, INC. AND THE OWNER(S) OF RECORD AS OF THIS DATE, OF THE PROPERTYDELINEATED HEREON AND THE SUBJECT OF THE SURVEY.A LAND SURVEYING AND MAPPING COMPANYPO BOX 614 - 529 S. WILD HORSE DRIVENEW CASTLE, COLORADO 81647(970) 984-0474www.truenorthcolorado.com TRUE NORTH COLORADO LLC.A LAND SURVEYING AND MAPPING COMPANYPO BOX 614 - 529 S. WILD HORSE DRIVENEW CASTLE, COLORADO 81647(970) 984-0474www.truenorthcolorado.com TRUE NORTH COLORADO LLC.A LAND SURVEYING AND MAPPING COMPANYPO BOX 614 - 529 S. WILD HORSE DRIVENEW CASTLE, COLORADO 81647(970) 984-0474www.truenorthcolorado.com SCHEDULE B PART II TITLE EXCEPTIONS: EXCEPTIONS 1 THROUGH 9 ARE STANDARD TITLE EXCEPTIONS. 10.) THIS PROPERTY IS SUBJECT TO EXCEPTIONS AND RESERVATIONS AS SET FORTH IN THE ACT AUTHORIZING THE ISSUANCE OF THE PATENT FOR THE CITY AND TOWNSITE OF ASPEN, DATED JANUARY 29, 1897 AND RECORDED MARCH 1, 1897 IN BOOK 139 AT PAGE 216 AS RECEPTION NO. 060156. 11.) THIS PROPERTY IS SUBJECT TO TERMS, CONDITIONS, PROVISIONS, AGREEMENTS AND OBLIGATIONS SPECIFIED UNDER AN ORDINANCE ACCEPTING A MAP ENTITLED "OFFICIAL MAP OF THE CITY OF ASPEN, PITKIN COUNTY, STATE OF COLORADO," AS THE OFFICIAL MAP OF THE CITY OF ASPEN: PROVIDING FOR DEDICATION OF ALL STREETS AND ALLEYS, EXCEPT SUCH STREETS AND ALLEYS HERETOFORE VACATED: AND PROVIDING FOR THE FILING OF SAID MAP, FIELD NOTES, AND SUPPLEMENTAL PLATS WITH THE CLERK AND RECORDER FOR PITKIN COUNTY (ORDINANCE NO. 6, SERIES OF 1959) DATED NOVEMBER 16, 1959, AND RECORDED DECEMBER 18, 1959, AS RECEPTION NO. 109043. 12.) THIS PROPERTY IS SUBJECT TO TERMS, CONDITIONS, PROVISIONS, AGREEMENTS AND OBLIGATIONS SPECIFIED UNDER ORDINANCE NO. 45 (SERIES OF 2006) RECORDED MARCH 28, 2007, AS RECEPTION NO. 535861. HISTORIC DESIGNATION. 13.) DRIVEWAY ENCROACHMENT, ENCROACHMENT OF WOOD RETAINING WALLS AND ENCROACHMENT OF RAILROAD TIE WALL, AS SHOWN ON THE IMPROVEMENT SURVEY PLAT, PROVIDED BY TRUE NORTH COLORADO, DATED JANUARY 18, 2019 AS PROJECT NO. 2019-104. 14.) THIS PROPERTY IS SUBJECT TO ANY EXISTING LEASES OR TENANCIES, AND ANY AND ALL PARTIES CLAIMING BY, THROUGH OR UNDER SAID LESSEES. TREE TYPE SIZE DRIP TREE CHART 1 2 30"40' 16"32' CONIFEROUS CONIFEROUS 3 22"32'CONIFEROUS 4 20"30' 5 6 6"12' 7 8" 8 16'9 10 40"40'CONIFEROUS11 12 ASPEN 13 ASPEN 14 ASPEN 15 ASPEN 16 SCALE: 1" = 500' 16"32'ASPEN CONIFEROUS 24"30'CONIFEROUS ASPEN ASPEN ASPEN 16' 16' 8" 8"ASPEN 16"32'ASPEN 8"16' 6"12' 8"16' 8"16' ZONING: CITY OF ASPEN LAND USE CODE: R-6 SETBACKS FRONT YARD: PRINCIPAL BUILDINGS: 10 FEET ACCESSORY BUILDINGS: 15 FEET REAR YARD: PRINCIPAL BUILDINGS: 10 FEET PRINCIPAL BUILDING USED SOLELY AS GARAGE: 5 FEET ACCESSORY BUILDINGS: 5 FEET SIDE YARD: MINIMUM: 5 FEET 10 FEET, PLUS 1 FOOT FOR EACH ADDITIONAL 300 SQUARE FEET OF GROSS LOT AREA, TO A MAXIMUM OF 15 FEET OF TOTAL SIDE YARD W. HY M A N A V E N U E W. HO P K I N S A V E N U E MAIN S T R E E T3RD STREET2ND STREET1ST STREETSITE N SHEET TITLE INTEGRATED DESIGN TEAM PROJECT NO: MODEL FILE: DRAWN BY: COPYRIGHT: SHEET 4 C.001 Jeffrey H Woodruff 312_W_Hyman_03312023.pln Project No. 116 /Users/jeffrey/Documents/Cloud Hill/Rainbow/structural/312_W_Hyman_03312023.plnPowder Day Skiiing, LLC, David A Tarrab Mees Title 312 W Hyman Ave 312 W Hyman Ave Lots P+Q, Block 46 Aspen CO 81611 USA/ Pitkin County UGB, City of Aspen 312 W Hyman Ave Aspen CO 81611 USA Account # R000145 Parcel ID # 273512464006 Landscape Architect Jennifer M. Dolecki-Smith, RLA Escape Garden Design, LLC Civil Grading and Drainage Jay Engstrom, P.E. Crystal River Civil, LLC Structural Engineer Brian Rossiter, P.E. bwr.pe Contractor COA- HPO Site Visit08/22/21 Jeffrey H. Woodruff AIA, LEED AP Cloud Hill Design, LLC Snowmass CO 81654 USA COA- HPC Conceptual02/26/22 COA- HPC Conceptual04/27/22 COA- HPC Final07/27/22 COA- City Council Call Up10/12/22 COA- HPC Final04/12/23 D D790279027902 79 0 3 7901790 2 7901790279037904 79027901 312 West Hyman Residence Spa 312 West Hyman Garage Alley (Gravel ) West H y m a n A v e n u e (Asphal t ) Design Notes 1.The design is based on the best available information. This includes but is not limited to site conditions, features and structures, and topographical information. Crystal River Civil is assuming no responsibility for the accuracy of site information. 2.If any discrepancies or inaccurate information is found within Crystal River Civils' documents, the affected work should be temporarily put on hold. Contact CRC to verify a solution and hold all work until the necessary alterations have been made. 3.No field changes are to occur without written approval of the engineer. If changes are requested and approved, Crystal River Civil will review the change and respond accordingly. Construction Notes 1.All work completed on this project must meet standards set by the project's jurisdictions. This includes but is not limited to HOA standards, city/town standards, county standards, and/or state standards. 2.The contractor is required to have a copy of current and approved construction plans. Any standards and specifications necessary for the work must be on site for the duration of the project as well. 3.All work must be completed to horizontal and vertical information shown on the plans. If any changes have occurred, Crystal River Civil must verify the alterations prior to receiving approval of completion. 4.Construction staking of horizontal and vertical layout is the responsibility of the Contractor. If additional documents, site visits for verification, or alterations are necessary, Crystal River Civil can be hired for construction administration for additional services. 5.Property lines, monuments, benchmarks, survey control, and additional historic survey information cannot be removed and cannot be removed for construction. Disturbed survey items are the responsibility of the contractor and must be restored by a state of Colorado licensed land surveyor. 6.Work and storage areas must be maintained only onsite. Project construction in Right-Of-Ways, public space, and private property must be approved in writing by the necessary jurisdiction or individual. 7.Limits of disturbance, tree protection, and slope protection defined within the plans must be met. Disturbances outside of these extents may require alterations to the design and has implications that are the responsibility of the contractor. If damage shall occur outside of these areas, the site conditions shall be restored to their original state. 8.If applicable and a tree removal plan has been developed for the project, it is the responsibility of the contractor to meet the proposed conditions by the approved document. The contractor must not damage, trim, or remove trees and or bushes that are not approved for modification by the tree removal plan. Approval for proceeding with additional tree removal must be approved by Crystal River Civil, the landscape architect, the owner, and/or any stakeholders. 9.The Contractor is responsible for removal of waste created onsite from construction. Waste material that does not meet the requirements for cannot be used for backfilling on the project and must be exported from the site. 10.All materials requiring compaction must meet CDOT and/or ASTM Standards. 11.If traffic control is needed for the project, it is the responsibility of the contractor to obtain and implement an approved traffic control plan. Street access must be provided to the public within the Right-Of-Way - Any obstruction to general traffic flow must be mitigated for. Pedestrian access must be always provided, and traffic entering and leaving the project site is to be observed by the contractor. 12.Dust mitigation must be provided by the contractor as necessary. Water shall be used as a dust palliative where and when required. Sweeping and cleaning streets and sidewalks during the construction will be directed by the affected jurisdictions and performed as necessary by the contractor. Utility Notes 1.Utilities shown on these plans have been located and documented by the surveyor. 2.Existing utilities must be verified on the site prior to construction. The contractor must protect and maintain these existing utilities throughout construction. If any damages occur to existing utility lines, it is the responsibility of the contractor to coordinate with the utility provider replace and repair the utilities as necessary. 3.The contractor must notify the utility providers a minimum of 3 days prior to any work completed. Coordination with the utility providers is the responsibility of the contractor. 4.All utility work completed by the contractor must be installed as per the utility providers' standards and requirements. Inspections must be performed by utility providers as deemed necessary by the corresponding standards. It is the responsibility of the contractor to organize these inspections. 5.If any shallow utilities, including communication and telephone services and lines, are exposed, and temporarily altered for construction, the reinstallation of these utilities must conform with the utility providers standards. 6.Uncovered gas lines must be temporarily contained with 18 inches backfill to minimize exposure. 7.Stormwater infrastructure must pe protected by the contractor as shown in the Erosion Control Plan. During construction, additional stormwater management may be necessary during specific construction procedures and is the responsibility of the contractor. XC XC C C C XFO XFO FO FO << FD FD XG XG G G G XSS XSS SS SS XUE XUE UE UE XOE XOE OE OE XT XT T T T XW XW W W W XWS XWS WS WS Abbreviations: ASTM American Society of Testing and Materials Avg Average Bldg Building BM Benchmark BMP Best Management Practices BOW Bottom of Wall Con Concrete Demo Demolition Dia or Ø Diameter Dim Dimension El or Elev Elevation Ex Existing FFE Finished Floor Elevation FL Flow Line Ft Foot or Feet Gal Gallons Horiz Horizontal Hp High Point Inv Invert LF Linear Feet LP Low Point Max Maximum Min Minimum NTS Not To Scale Off Offset PC Point of Horizontal Tangency PCC Point of Compound Curve Perf Perforated PI Point of Horizontal Tangency Prop Proposed PVC Polyvinyl Chloride Pipe Q Flow Rate RCP Reinforced Concrete Pipe ROW Right-Of-Way SF Square Feet Sta Station SY Square Yard TD Trench Drain Legend Existing Communications Line Proposed Easement Line Edge of Pavement Edge of Gravel Edge of Water Fiber Optic Line Flow Line Foundation Drain Gas Line Gutter Flow Line / Break Line Major Contour Line Minor Contour Line Property Line Sanitary Sewer Line Storm Drain Line Concrete / Sidewalk / Patio Underground Electric Line Overhead Electric Line Telephone Line Water Line Water Service Line TOW Top of Wall XRW XRW RW RWRaw Water Line Drawing Scale Units (Feet) 1" = 10' 0 10 20 N S W E C.001 Title Of 11 Pages01HPC Submission07.27.2022VJT#DescriptionDateDrawn By312 West HymanAspen, Colorado 816111101 Village Road, Unit UL-4C Carbondale, CO 81623 (970) 510 - 5312 JKEReviewed ByFor Construction Job #: 22.4202Permit Set10.27.2022VJTJKE312 West Hyman Aspen, Colorado 81611 Vicinity Map Not To Scale Sheet List Table Sheet Number Sheet Title C.001 Title C.002 Existing Conditions C.003 Demolition Plan C.004 Grading Plan C.005 Basins C.006 Subbasins C.007 Drainage Layout C.008 Drainage Profiles C.009 Utility plan C.010 Erosion Control C.011 Details Site SHEET TITLE INTEGRATED DESIGN TEAM PROJECT NO: MODEL FILE: DRAWN BY: COPYRIGHT: SHEET 5 C.002 Jeffrey H Woodruff 312_W_Hyman_03312023.pln Project No. 116 /Users/jeffrey/Documents/Cloud Hill/Rainbow/structural/312_W_Hyman_03312023.plnPowder Day Skiiing, LLC, David A Tarrab Mees Existing Conditions 312 W Hyman Ave 312 W Hyman Ave Lots P+Q, Block 46 Aspen CO 81611 USA/ Pitkin County UGB, City of Aspen 312 W Hyman Ave Aspen CO 81611 USA Account # R000145 Parcel ID # 273512464006 Landscape Architect Jennifer M. Dolecki-Smith, RLA Escape Garden Design, LLC Civil Grading and Drainage Jay Engstrom, P.E. Crystal River Civil, LLC Structural Engineer Brian Rossiter, P.E. bwr.pe Contractor COA- HPO Site Visit08/22/21 Jeffrey H. Woodruff AIA, LEED AP Cloud Hill Design, LLC Snowmass CO 81654 USA COA- HPC Conceptual02/26/22 COA- HPC Conceptual04/27/22 COA- HPC Final07/27/22 COA- City Council Call Up10/12/22 COA- HPC Final04/12/23 C.002 Existing Conditions Of 11 Pages01HPC Submission07.27.2022VJT#DescriptionDateDrawn By312 West HymanAspen, Colorado 816111101 Village Road, Unit UL-4C Carbondale, CO 81623 (970) 510 - 5312 JKEReviewed ByFor Construction Job #: 22.4202Permit Set10.27.2022VJTJKE SHEET TITLE INTEGRATED DESIGN TEAM PROJECT NO: MODEL FILE: DRAWN BY: COPYRIGHT: SHEET 6 C.003 Jeffrey H Woodruff 312_W_Hyman_03312023.pln Project No. 116 /Users/jeffrey/Documents/Cloud Hill/Rainbow/structural/312_W_Hyman_03312023.plnPowder Day Skiiing, LLC, David A Tarrab Mees Demolition Plan 312 W Hyman Ave 312 W Hyman Ave Lots P+Q, Block 46 Aspen CO 81611 USA/ Pitkin County UGB, City of Aspen 312 W Hyman Ave Aspen CO 81611 USA Account # R000145 Parcel ID # 273512464006 Landscape Architect Jennifer M. Dolecki-Smith, RLA Escape Garden Design, LLC Civil Grading and Drainage Jay Engstrom, P.E. Crystal River Civil, LLC Structural Engineer Brian Rossiter, P.E. bwr.pe Contractor COA- HPO Site Visit08/22/21 Jeffrey H. Woodruff AIA, LEED AP Cloud Hill Design, LLC Snowmass CO 81654 USA COA- HPC Conceptual02/26/22 COA- HPC Conceptual04/27/22 COA- HPC Final07/27/22 COA- City Council Call Up10/12/22 COA- HPC Final04/12/23 EEGXWS XWS XWS XWSXWSXWSXWSXWSXWSXWSXWSXWSXWSXWSXWXWXWXWXWXWXWXWXWXWXWXWXWXWXWXWXWXWXWXWXWXWXWXWXWXWXGXGXGXGXGXGXGXGXGXGXGXGXGXGXGXGXGXGXUEXUEXUEXUEXUEXUEXUEXUEXUEXUEXUEXUEXUEXUEXUEXUEXUEXUEXUEXUEXUEXUE X U E X U E X U E X U E X U E X U E X U E X U E X U E X U E X U E X U E X U E X U E XTXTXTXTXTXTXTXTXTXTXTXTXTXTXTXTXTXTXTXTXT XT XT XTXT X T X T X T X T X T X T X T X T X T X T X T X T X T X T X T XCXCXCXCXCXCXCXCXCXCXCXCXCXCXCXCXCXCXCXCXC XCXC XCXC X C X C X C X C X C X C X C X C X C X C X C X C X C X C X C XGXGXGXGXGXGXGXGXGXGXGXGXGXGXGXGXGXGXGXGXG X T X T X T XUEXUEXUEXSSXSSXSSXSSXSSXSSXSSXSSXSSXSSXSSXSSXSSXSSXSSXSSXSSXSSXSSXSSXSSXSSXSSXSSXSSXSSXSSXSSXSSXSSXSSXSS XSS XSS XSS XSS XSS XSS XSS XSS XSS XSS XSS XSS XSS XSS XSS XSS <79037901 79027 9 0 1 79 0 2 7903 7904 7902 Remove Existing Driveway and Railroad Ties. Prepare for Minor Regrading and New Driveway Surface. 972 Square Feet Remove Existing Patios and Landscaping. Prepare for Minor Regrading and New Flagstone Walkways and Patios. 791 Square Feet Remove Existing Landscaping. Prepare for Minor Regrading and New Flagstone Walkways and Patios. 798 Square Feet Prepare for Construction of Garage 555 Square Feet Clear and Grub for Installation of Utilities 75 Square Feet Clear and Grub for Installation Of Proposed Driveway 75 Square Feet Clear and Grub Right-Of-Way For Installation Of Proposed Driveway 138 Square Feet Abandon Portion of Gas Service. To Be Rerouted Around Garage. 39 Linear Feet Abandon Portion of Sewer Service. To Be Rerouted Around Garage. 34 Linear Feet Clear and Grub Area For Minor Regrading 50 Square Feet Clear Existing Landscaping And Prepare for Proposed Patio 70 Square Feet Clear Existing Landscaping For Minor Regrading 40 Square Feet Clear Existing Landscaping For Installation Of Spa 128 Square Feet Minimize Disturbance Within Dripline of Existing Trees. Do Not Use Heavy Machinery Within Footprint and Use Hand Tools For Excavation. Cut All Roots Under 1 Inch With A Sharp Spade or Saw. Do Not Cut any Roots Larger than 1 Inch And Verify With Arborist Prior To Any Removal. Minimize Disturbance Within Dripline of Existing Trees. Do Not Use Heavy Machinery Within Footprint and Use Hand Tools For Excavation. Cut All Roots Under 1 Inch With A Sharp Spade or Saw. Do Not Cut any Roots Larger than 1Inch And Verify With Arborist Prior To Any Removal. Drawing Scale Units (Feet) 1" = 5' 0 5 10NSWE C.003 Demolition Plan Of 11 Pages01HPC Submission07.27.2022VJT#DescriptionDateDrawn By312 West HymanAspen, Colorado 816111101 Village Road, Unit UL-4C Carbondale, CO 81623 (970) 510 - 5312 JKEReviewed ByFor Construction Job #: 22.4202Permit Set10.27.2022VJTJKE SHEET TITLE INTEGRATED DESIGN TEAM PROJECT NO: MODEL FILE: DRAWN BY: COPYRIGHT: SHEET 7 C.004 Jeffrey H Woodruff 312_W_Hyman_03312023.pln Project No. 116 /Users/jeffrey/Documents/Cloud Hill/Rainbow/structural/312_W_Hyman_03312023.plnPowder Day Skiiing, LLC, David A Tarrab Mees Grading Plan 312 W Hyman Ave 312 W Hyman Ave Lots P+Q, Block 46 Aspen CO 81611 USA/ Pitkin County UGB, City of Aspen 312 W Hyman Ave Aspen CO 81611 USA Account # R000145 Parcel ID # 273512464006 Landscape Architect Jennifer M. Dolecki-Smith, RLA Escape Garden Design, LLC Civil Grading and Drainage Jay Engstrom, P.E. Crystal River Civil, LLC Structural Engineer Brian Rossiter, P.E. bwr.pe Contractor COA- HPO Site Visit08/22/21 Jeffrey H. Woodruff AIA, LEED AP Cloud Hill Design, LLC Snowmass CO 81654 USA COA- HPC Conceptual02/26/22 COA- HPC Conceptual04/27/22 COA- HPC Final07/27/22 COA- City Council Call Up10/12/22 COA- HPC Final04/12/23 EEGXWS XWS XWS XWSXWSXWSXWSXWSXWSXWSXWSXWSXWSXWSXWXWXWXWXWXWXWXWXWXWXWXWXWXWXWXWXWXWXWXWXWXWXWXWXWXWXGXGXGXGXGXGXGXGXGXGXGXGXGXGXGXGXGXGXUEXUEXUEXUEXUEXUEXUEXUEXUEXUEXUEXUEXUEXUEXUEXUEXUEXUEXUEXUEXUEXUE X U E X U E X U E X U E X U E X U E X U E X U E X U E X U E X U E X U E X U E X U E XTXTXTXTXTXTXTXTXTXTXTXTXTXTXTXTXTXTXTXTXT XT XT XTXT X T X T X T X T X T X T X T X T X T X T X T X T X T X T X T XCXCXCXCXCXCXCXCXCXCXCXCXCXCXCXCXCXCXCXCXC XCXC XCXC X C X C X C X C X C X C X C X C X C X C X C X C X C X C X C XGXGXGXGXGXGXGXG X T X T X T XUEXUEXUEXSSXSSXSSXSSXSSXSSXSSXSSXSSXSSXSSXSSXSSXSSXSSXSSXSSXSSXSSXSSXSSXSSXSSXSSXSSXSSXSSXSSXSSXSSXSSXSS XSS XSS XSS XSS <GGGGGGGGGGGGGG GGGGGGGGS SSSSSSSSSS S SSSSSSSSSSSSSSSS SSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSUEUEUEUEUEUE1.31 1.31 1.31 1.07 0.89 1.12 1.23 1.32 1.32 1.09 1.21 1.23 1.30 1.30 1.32 1.32 1.25 1.24 1.32 1.32 1.32 1.23 1.17 1.23 1.29 1.29 1.211.79 1.93 TBC:1.88 3.17 3.09 TBC:1.66 1.31 Inlet:1.11 Inlet:0.90 Inlet:1.11 2.54 2.86 2.86 2.38 2.33 2.38 2.35 2.86 2.86 2.82 2.72 3.69 2.01 7902 7902 7902TBC:1.58 1.28 2.8%2.2%2.1%2.0% Inlet:2.31 1.64 1.33 1.15 1.10 312 West Hyman Main Residence 1.26 Inlet:1.11 312 West Hyman Garage F.F.E. = 7902.86'Garage F .F .E . = 7901 .31 ' F.F.E. = 7 9 0 1. 3 6' F.F.E. = 7 9 0 1. 3 3'F.F .E . = 7901 .36 ' 1.14 2.0% Sandset Flagstone Walkway Neighboring Concrete Retaining Wall Currently Under Construction Gravel DrivewaySod Crusher Fi n e s Ribbon D ri v e w a y 4.1% Dryset Steppingstone Path Sandset Flagstone Patio Prop. Stormwater Detention DrywellSandset Flagsto n e P ati o (3) 6" Steps 2.80 2.80 79037901 79027 9 0 1 79 0 2 7903 7904 7902 Property Line (Typ.) Setback Line (Typ.) Stone Curb 1.26 1.26 1.31 Paver Patio 1.17 1.86 8.7%Alley(Gravel)West Hyman Avenue(Asphalt)Exist. Vegetation (Typ.) Sod Inlet:0.857901 Exist. Stormwater Detention Drywell 0.91 0.93 0.96 0.98 Utility Meters To Be Relocated On Proposed Addition Spa Mechanical Access Hatch 12.00 3.0% 3.4% Exist. Planter To Remain Exist. Planter To Remain 5.0% 5.0% 3.1% 8.0% Exist. Stormwater System From Deck To Remain Breakline Self Contained Spa Top Of Spa Elev. = 7902.98' 1.17 1.04 Stone Perimeter Deck Elev. = 7902.98' (4) 6" Stone Risers To Spa Deck1.002.003.002.002.003.003.00 3.0020.3611.773.332.003.002.001.00 Crusher Fi n e s Ribbon Dri v e w a y 3.00Drawing Scale Units (Feet) 1" = 5' 0 5 10NSWE C.004 Grading Plan Of 11 Pages01HPC Submission07.27.2022VJT#DescriptionDateDrawn By312 West HymanAspen, Colorado 816111101 Village Road, Unit UL-4C Carbondale, CO 81623 (970) 510 - 5312 JKEReviewed ByFor Construction Job #: 22.4202Permit Set10.27.2022VJTJKE • HPC Granted a 7.4' combined side yard set back at Final 2022 • Requesting 5.4' Combined side yard setback at Susbtantial 2023 (East @ 2.4 + West @ 3). Change requested given new plumb retaining wall @ St Moritz at 2' from the property line (leaving 5' between the 6' retaining wall and the single story garage). HPC is the decision making body for the variance. SHEET TITLE INTEGRATED DESIGN TEAM PROJECT NO: MODEL FILE: DRAWN BY: COPYRIGHT: SHEET 8 C.005 Jeffrey H Woodruff 312_W_Hyman_03312023.pln Project No. 116 /Users/jeffrey/Documents/Cloud Hill/Rainbow/structural/312_W_Hyman_03312023.plnPowder Day Skiiing, LLC, David A Tarrab Mees Basins 312 W Hyman Ave 312 W Hyman Ave Lots P+Q, Block 46 Aspen CO 81611 USA/ Pitkin County UGB, City of Aspen 312 W Hyman Ave Aspen CO 81611 USA Account # R000145 Parcel ID # 273512464006 Landscape Architect Jennifer M. Dolecki-Smith, RLA Escape Garden Design, LLC Civil Grading and Drainage Jay Engstrom, P.E. Crystal River Civil, LLC Structural Engineer Brian Rossiter, P.E. bwr.pe Contractor COA- HPO Site Visit08/22/21 Jeffrey H. Woodruff AIA, LEED AP Cloud Hill Design, LLC Snowmass CO 81654 USA COA- HPC Conceptual02/26/22 COA- HPC Conceptual04/27/22 COA- HPC Final07/27/22 COA- City Council Call Up10/12/22 COA- HPC Final04/12/23 1 2 DD790279027902 7903 79017902790179027903790479027901 Exist Drywell 2 P.O.C. Basin 2 Exist. 4' Dia. Precast Conc. Drywell 10' Depth, 4' Perf. Section Drywell 1 P.O.C. Basin 1 5' Dia. Precast Conc. Drywell 8' Storage Depth, 6' Perf. Section Drawing Scale Units (Feet) 1" = 10' 0 10 20 N S W E C.005 Basins Of 11 Pages01HPC Submission07.27.2022VJT#DescriptionDateDrawn By312 West HymanAspen, Colorado 816111101 Village Road, Unit UL-4C Carbondale, CO 81623 (970) 510 - 5312 JKEReviewed ByFor Construction Job #: 22.4202Permit Set10.27.2022VJTJKE SHEET TITLE INTEGRATED DESIGN TEAM PROJECT NO: MODEL FILE: DRAWN BY: COPYRIGHT: SHEET 9 C.006 Jeffrey H Woodruff 312_W_Hyman_03312023.pln Project No. 116 /Users/jeffrey/Documents/Cloud Hill/Rainbow/structural/312_W_Hyman_03312023.plnPowder Day Skiiing, LLC, David A Tarrab Mees Subbasins 312 W Hyman Ave 312 W Hyman Ave Lots P+Q, Block 46 Aspen CO 81611 USA/ Pitkin County UGB, City of Aspen 312 W Hyman Ave Aspen CO 81611 USA Account # R000145 Parcel ID # 273512464006 Landscape Architect Jennifer M. Dolecki-Smith, RLA Escape Garden Design, LLC Civil Grading and Drainage Jay Engstrom, P.E. Crystal River Civil, LLC Structural Engineer Brian Rossiter, P.E. bwr.pe Contractor COA- HPO Site Visit08/22/21 Jeffrey H. Woodruff AIA, LEED AP Cloud Hill Design, LLC Snowmass CO 81654 USA COA- HPC Conceptual02/26/22 COA- HPC Conceptual04/27/22 COA- HPC Final07/27/22 COA- City Council Call Up10/12/22 COA- HPC Final04/12/232.2 2.1 1.1 1.2 1.9 1.3 1.5 1.7 1.6 1.4 1.8D D790279027902 7903 79017902790179027903790479027901 A1-Inlet Collects Subbasin 1.1 A5-Inlet Collects Subbasin 1.3 A4-Downspout Collects Subbasin 1.2 A7-Inlet Collects Subbasin 1.4 B1-Downspout Collects Subbasin 1.5 C1-Inlet Collects Subbasin 1.6 C3-Downspout Collects Subbasin 1.7 D2-Downspout Collects Subbasin 1.9 D1-Inlet Collects Subbasin 1.8 E1-Exist. Downspout Collects Subbasin 2.1 E4-Inlet Collects Subbasin 2.2 Drawing Scale Units (Feet) 1" = 10' 0 10 20 N S W E C.006 Subbasins Of 11 Pages01HPC Submission07.27.2022VJT#DescriptionDateDrawn By312 West HymanAspen, Colorado 816111101 Village Road, Unit UL-4C Carbondale, CO 81623 (970) 510 - 5312 JKEReviewed ByFor Construction Job #: 22.4202Permit Set10.27.2022VJTJKE SHEET TITLE INTEGRATED DESIGN TEAM PROJECT NO: MODEL FILE: DRAWN BY: COPYRIGHT: SHEET 10 C.007 Jeffrey H Woodruff 312_W_Hyman_03312023.pln Project No. 116 /Users/jeffrey/Documents/Cloud Hill/Rainbow/structural/312_W_Hyman_03312023.plnPowder Day Skiiing, LLC, David A Tarrab Mees Drainage Layout 312 W Hyman Ave 312 W Hyman Ave Lots P+Q, Block 46 Aspen CO 81611 USA/ Pitkin County UGB, City of Aspen 312 W Hyman Ave Aspen CO 81611 USA Account # R000145 Parcel ID # 273512464006 Landscape Architect Jennifer M. Dolecki-Smith, RLA Escape Garden Design, LLC Civil Grading and Drainage Jay Engstrom, P.E. Crystal River Civil, LLC Structural Engineer Brian Rossiter, P.E. bwr.pe Contractor COA- HPO Site Visit08/22/21 Jeffrey H. Woodruff AIA, LEED AP Cloud Hill Design, LLC Snowmass CO 81654 USA COA- HPC Conceptual02/26/22 COA- HPC Conceptual04/27/22 COA- HPC Final07/27/22 COA- City Council Call Up10/12/22 COA- HPC Final04/12/23<790279027902 7901790179047902C1-Inlet 8 Inch Inlet Sta:30+02.00, Off:0.00 L Drywell 1 5' Dia. Precast Conc. Drywell 8' Storage Depth, 6' Perf. Section Sta:10+78.45, Off:0.00 Exist Drywell 2 Exist. 4' Dia. Precast Conc. Drywell 10' Depth, 4' Perf. Section Sta:50+12.11, Off:0.00 A1-Inlet 8 Inch Inlet Sta:10+02.00, Off:0.00 A7-Inlet 8 Inch Inlet Sta:10+66.18, Off:0.00 A5-Inlet 8 Inch Inlet Sta:10+40.89, Off:0.00 E4-Inlet 8 Inch Inlet Sta:50+20.81, Off:0.00 D1-Inlet 8 Inch Inlet Sta:40+02.00, Off:0.00 C2-Bend 4" 45° PVC Bend Sta:30+05.34, Off:0.00 C3-Downspout 4" PVC Downspout Tie In Sta:30+10.03, Off:0.72 R C3-Pipe Inv Out: 7899.06' C4-Tee 4"x4"x4" PVC Tee Sta:30+10.03, Off:0.00 A2-Bend 4" 45° PVC Bend Sta:10+06.41, Off:0.00 B1-Downspout 4" PVC Downspout Tie In Sta:20+02.23, Off:0.00 E1-Exist. Downspout Existing 4" PVC Downspout Tie In Sta:50+02.00, Off:0.00 L C5-Bend 4" 45° PVC Bend Sta:30+15.52, Off:0.00 E2-Exist Bend Existing 4" 45° PVC Bend Sta:50+03.48, Off:0.00 D2-Downspout 4" PVC Downspout Tie In Sta:40+06.34, Off:-6.97 L D2-Pipe Inv Out: 7898.73' E3-Exist Bend Existing 4" 45° PVC Bend Sta:50+07.47, Off:0.00 D3-Tee 4"x4"x4" PVC Tee Sta:40+06.31, Off:0.00 A4-Downspout 4" PVC Downspout Tie In Sta:10+41.70, Off:3.95 R A4-Pipe Inv Out: 7898.58' A3-Bend 4" 45° PVC Bend Sta:10+37.88, Off:0.00 A6-Bend 4" 45° PVC Bend Sta:10+43.54, Off:0.00 D4-Bend 4" 45° PVC Bend Sta:40+11.26, Off:0.00 B2-Bend 4" 22.5° PVC Bend Sta:20+18.78, Off:0.00 C6-Bend 4" 45° PVC Bend Sta:30+21.92, Off:0.00 A8-Bend 6" 45° PVC Bend Sta:10+69.01, Off:0.00 A9-Wye 4"x6"x6" PVC Wye Sta:10+74.29, Off:0.00 E4-Pipe E3-Exist Pipe E1-Exist Pipe D1-Pipe D4-Pipe A9-Pipe A2-P ipe A3-Pipe A5-Pipe A6-Pip e A4-Pipe 4.03' Of 4" SDR-35 @ 1.00%A1-PipeA7-Pipe A8-Pipe B1-Pipe B2-Pip e C1-Pipe C2-Pipe C5-Pipe C6-Pipe C4-Pipe C3-Pipe 0.72' Of 4" SDR-35 @ 2.00% E2-Exist Pipe D3-Pipe D2-Pipe 6.97' Of 4" SDR-35 @ 2.00%PI : 50+12 .11 PI: 50+ 0 3. 4 8 PI: 5 0 + 0 7 . 4 7 Start Storm System E STA:50+00.00 N:14954.07 E:14923.15 End Storm System E STA:50+22.81 N:14936.49 E:14919.63PI: 20+18.78Start Storm System B STA:20+00.00 N:15003.80 E:14881.45 End Storm System B STA:20+41.66 N:15002.04 E:14922.30PI: 30+05.34PI: 30+15.52 PI: 30+21.90Start Storm System C STA:30+00.00 N:15022.51 E:14907.83 End Storm System C STA:30+32.83 N:15000.07 E:14922.17 PI: 1 0 + 0 6 . 4 1 PI: 10+ 3 7. 8 8 PI: 1 0 + 4 3 . 5 4 PI : 10+69 .01 Start Storm System A STA:10+00.00 N:14949.83 E:14883.18 End Storm System A STA:10+83.45 N:15005.17 E:14920.61 PI: 40+11.26Start Storm System D STA:40+00.00 N:14976.68 E:14924.21 End Storm System D STA:40+26.81 N:14999.54 E:14914.53 L1L2L3L4 L5L6 L7 L8 L9L 1 0 L11 L12L13 L14L15L16 L177901 Line Table Line L1 L2 L3 L4 L5 L6 L7 L8 L9 L10 L11 L12 L13 L14 L15 L16 L17 Bearing N36°52'38"E N8°07'22"W N36°52'38"E N81°52'38"E N40°45'07"E S75°21'01"E N82°29'52"E S37°50'58"E S15°10'22"W S29°49'38"E S74°49'38"E N49°14'53"W N4°14'53"W S8°12'01"E S36°44'32"W S81°52'38"W S16°04'53"E Length 6.41' 31.48' 5.65' 25.47' 14.44' 18.78' 22.88' 5.34' 10.18' 6.37' 10.94' 11.26' 15.55' 3.48' 3.99' 4.64' 10.70' Start Point (N,E) 14949.83,14883.18 14954.95,14887.02 14986.11,14882.58 14990.63,14885.97 14994.23,14911.18 15003.80,14881.45 14999.05,14899.62 15022.51,14907.83 15018.29,14911.11 15008.47,14908.45 15002.94,14911.62 14976.68,14924.21 14984.03,14915.69 14954.07,14923.15 14950.62,14923.65 14947.43,14921.27 14946.77,14916.67 End Point (N,E) 14954.95,14887.02 14986.11,14882.58 14990.63,14885.97 14994.23,14911.18 15005.17,14920.61 14999.05,14899.62 15002.04,14922.30 15018.29,14911.11 15008.47,14908.45 15002.94,14911.62 15000.07,14922.17 14984.03,14915.69 14999.54,14914.53 14950.62,14923.65 14947.43,14921.27 14946.77,14916.67 14936.49,14919.63 Drawing Scale Units (Feet) 1" = 5' 0 5 10 N S W E C.007 Drainage Layout Of 11 Pages01HPC Submission07.27.2022VJT#DescriptionDateDrawn By312 West HymanAspen, Colorado 816111101 Village Road, Unit UL-4C Carbondale, CO 81623 (970) 510 - 5312 JKEReviewed ByFor Construction Job #: 22.4202Permit Set10.27.2022VJTJKE SHEET TITLE INTEGRATED DESIGN TEAM PROJECT NO: MODEL FILE: DRAWN BY: COPYRIGHT: SHEET 11 C.008 Jeffrey H Woodruff 312_W_Hyman_03312023.pln Project No. 116 /Users/jeffrey/Documents/Cloud Hill/Rainbow/structural/312_W_Hyman_03312023.plnPowder Day Skiiing, LLC, David A Tarrab Mees Drainage Profiles 312 W Hyman Ave 312 W Hyman Ave Lots P+Q, Block 46 Aspen CO 81611 USA/ Pitkin County UGB, City of Aspen 312 W Hyman Ave Aspen CO 81611 USA Account # R000145 Parcel ID # 273512464006 Landscape Architect Jennifer M. Dolecki-Smith, RLA Escape Garden Design, LLC Civil Grading and Drainage Jay Engstrom, P.E. Crystal River Civil, LLC Structural Engineer Brian Rossiter, P.E. bwr.pe Contractor COA- HPO Site Visit08/22/21 Jeffrey H. Woodruff AIA, LEED AP Cloud Hill Design, LLC Snowmass CO 81654 USA COA- HPC Conceptual02/26/22 COA- HPC Conceptual04/27/22 COA- HPC Final07/27/22 COA- City Council Call Up10/12/22 COA- HPC Final04/12/23 Storm System A Profile Horizontal Scale: 1"=5' Vertical Scale: 1"=5' 7890 7900 7910 7890 7900 7910 10+20EG 7901.3 FG 7901.2610+40EG 7901.3 FG 7901.1510+60EG 7901.2 FG 7901.2910+80EG 7901.2 FG 7901.33Storm System D Profile Horizontal Scale: 1"=5' Vertical Scale: 1"=5' 7890 7900 7910 7890 7900 7910 Storm System B Profile Horizontal Scale: 1"=5' Vertical Scale: 1"=5' 7890 7900 7910 7890 7900 7910 Storm System C Profile Horizontal Scale: 1"=5' Vertical Scale: 1"=5' 7890 7900 7910 7890 7900 7910 20+20EG 7901.1 FG 7901.4320+40EG 7901.2 FG 7901.3030+20EG 7901.1 FG 7901.4240+20EG 7901.2 FG 7901.20Storm System E Profile Horizontal Scale: 1"=5' Vertical Scale: 1"=5' 7890 7900 7910 7890 7900 7910 50+20EG 7901.2 FG 7900.88A2-Bend 4" 45° PVC Bend Inv Elev: 7898.88' A2-Pipe 31.48' Of 4" SDR-35 @ 1.00% A3-Bend 4" 45° PVC Bend Inv Elev: 7898.57' A3-Pipe 3.00' Of 4" SDR-35 @ 1.00% A5-Inlet 8 Inch Inlet Rim:7901.11' Sump:7898.04' A3-Pipe Inv In: 7898.54' A4-Pipe Inv In: 7898.54' A5-Pipe Inv Out: 7898.54' A5-Pipe 2.65' Of 4" SDR-35 @ 1.00% A6-Bend 4" 45° PVC Bend Inv Elev: 7898.51' A6-Pipe 22.64' Of 4" SDR-35 @ 1.00% A7-Inlet 8 Inch Inlet Rim:7901.11' Sump:7897.79' A6-Pipe Inv In: 7898.29' A7-Pipe Inv Out: 7898.29' A7-Pipe 2.83' Of 6" SDR-35 @ 1.00% A8-Bend 6" 45° PVC Bend Inv Elev: 7898.26' A8-Pipe 5.28' Of 6" SDR-35 @ 1.00% A9-Wye 4"x6"x6" PVC Wye Inv Elev: 7898.21' Drywell 1 5' Dia. Precast Conc. Drywell 8' Storage Depth, 6' Perf. Section Rim:7901.30' Sump:7891.30' A9-Pipe Inv In: 7898.16' C6-Pipe Inv In: 7898.16' B2-Pipe Inv In: 7898.16' Drywell 1 5' Dia. Precast Conc. Drywell 8' Storage Depth, 6' Perf. Section Rim:7901.30' Sump:7891.30' A9-Pipe Inv In: 7898.16' C6-Pipe Inv In: 7898.16' B2-Pipe Inv In: 7898.16'B1-Downspout 4" PVC Downspout Tie In Inv Elev: 7898.85' B1-Pipe 16.55' Of 4" SDR-35 @ 2.00% B2-Pipe 17.88' Of 4" SDR-35 @ 2.00% B2-Bend 4" 22.5° PVC Bend Inv Elev: 7898.52' C1-Inlet 8 Inch Inlet Rim:7902.31' Sump:7899.45' C1-Pipe Inv Out: 7899.45' C1-Pipe 3.34' Of 4" SDR-35 @ 5.00% C2-Bend 4" 45° PVC Bend Inv Elev: 7899.28' C2-Pipe 4.69' Of 4" SDR-35 @ 5.00% C4-Tee 4"x4"x4" PVC Tee Inv Elev: 7899.05' C4-Pipe 5.49' Of 4" SDR-35 @ 5.00% Drywell 1 5' Dia. Precast Conc. Drywell 8' Storage Depth, 6' Perf. Section Rim:7901.30' Sump:7891.30' A9-Pipe Inv In: 7898.16' C6-Pipe Inv In: 7898.16' B2-Pipe Inv In: 7898.16' C6-Pipe 5.91' Of 4" SDR-35 @ 5.00% C6-Bend 4" 45° PVC Bend Inv Elev: 7898.46' C5-Pipe 6.39' Of 4" SDR-35 @ 5.00% C5-Bend 4" 45° PVC Bend Inv Elev: 7898.78' A9-Wye 4"x6"x6" PVC Wye Inv Elev: 7898.21'D1-Inlet 8 Inch Inlet Rim:7900.90' Sump:7898.18' D1-Pipe Inv Out: 7898.68' D1-Pipe 4.31' Of 4" SDR-35 @ 2.00% D4-Bend 4" 45° PVC Bend Inv Elev: 7898.49' D4-Pipe 14.25' Of 4" SDR-35 @ 2.00% Exist Drywell 2 Exist. 4' Dia. Precast Conc. Drywell 10' Depth, 4' Perf. Section Rim:7901.20' Sump:7891.20' E4-Pipe Inv In: 7898.57' E3-Exist Pipe Inv In: 7898.57' E4-Pipe 8.70' Of 4" SDR-35 @ 2.00% E4-Inlet 8 Inch Inlet Rim:7900.85' Sump:7898.25' E4-Pipe Inv Out: 7898.75' E3-Exist Pipe 4.64' Of 4" SDR-35 @ 2.00% E3-Exist Bend Existing 4" 45° PVC Bend Inv Elev: 7898.67' E1-Exist. Downspout Existing 4" PVC Downspout Tie In Inv Elev: 7898.78' E1-Exist Pipe 1.48' Of 4" SDR-35 @ 2.00% E2-Exist Pipe 3.99' Of 4" SDR-35 @ 2.00% E2-Exist Bend Existing 4" 45° PVC Bend Inv Elev: 7898.75' D3-Pipe 4.95' Of 4" SDR-35 @ 2.00% D3-Tee 4"x4"x4" PVC Tee Inv Elev: 7898.59' A1-Inlet 8 Inch Inlet Rim:7901.11' Sump:7898.43' A1-Pipe Inv Out: 7898.93' A1-Pipe 4.41' Of 4" SDR-35 @ 1.00% A9-Pipe 4.16' Of 6" SDR-35 @ 1.00% C.008 Drainage Profiles Of 11 Pages01HPC Submission07.27.2022VJT#DescriptionDateDrawn By312 West HymanAspen, Colorado 816111101 Village Road, Unit UL-4C Carbondale, CO 81623 (970) 510 - 5312 JKEReviewed ByFor Construction Job #: 22.4202Permit Set10.27.2022VJTJKE SHEET TITLE INTEGRATED DESIGN TEAM PROJECT NO: MODEL FILE: DRAWN BY: COPYRIGHT: SHEET 12 C.009 Jeffrey H Woodruff 312_W_Hyman_03312023.pln Project No. 116 /Users/jeffrey/Documents/Cloud Hill/Rainbow/structural/312_W_Hyman_03312023.plnPowder Day Skiiing, LLC, David A Tarrab Mees Utility Plan 312 W Hyman Ave 312 W Hyman Ave Lots P+Q, Block 46 Aspen CO 81611 USA/ Pitkin County UGB, City of Aspen 312 W Hyman Ave Aspen CO 81611 USA Account # R000145 Parcel ID # 273512464006 Landscape Architect Jennifer M. Dolecki-Smith, RLA Escape Garden Design, LLC Civil Grading and Drainage Jay Engstrom, P.E. Crystal River Civil, LLC Structural Engineer Brian Rossiter, P.E. bwr.pe Contractor COA- HPO Site Visit08/22/21 Jeffrey H. Woodruff AIA, LEED AP Cloud Hill Design, LLC Snowmass CO 81654 USA COA- HPC Conceptual02/26/22 COA- HPC Conceptual04/27/22 COA- HPC Final07/27/22 COA- City Council Call Up10/12/22 COA- HPC Final04/12/23 E E G XWSXWSXWSXWSXWSXWSXWXWXWXWXWXWXWXWXWXWXWXWXW XG XG XG XG XG XG XG XG XUE XUE XUE XUE XUE XUE XUE XUE XUE XUEXUEXUEXUEXUEXUEXUEXT XT XT XT XT XT XT XT XT XT XTXTXTXTXTXTXTXTXC XC XC XC XC XC XC XC XC XC XCXCXCXCXCXCXCXCXCXG XG XGXTXUEXSSXSSXSSXSSXSSXSSXSSXSSXSSXSSXSSXSS XSS XSS XSS XSSXSSGG GGGGGGGG GSSSS SSSSSSSSSSS S S S SS SS UEUE UE DD790279027902 7903 79017902790179027903790479027901 Existing Water Service And Tap To Remain Relocated Gas Service ± 53 L.F. Relocated Sanitary Sewer Service. 4" SDR-26 PVC Sloped At Min. 2.0% To Connection. Gas Meter To Be Relocated To The Exterior Of The Proposed Addition Install Two Way Cleanout Within 5' Of Structure Existing Electric, Telephone And Communications Services To Remain Install Sewer Service Two Way Cleanout Cut Existing Sanitary Sewer Service. Install 4" 45° Bend At Connection. Begin Gas Service Relocation. Coordinate With Black Hills Energy Prior To Construction. Existing Utility Equipment To Be Relocated To The Exterior Of The Proposed Addition 312 West Hyman Residence 312 West Hyman Garage 2" Sch-40 PVC Conduit For Electric Service To Proposed Garage ± 17 L.F. Drawing Scale Units (Feet) 1" = 10' 0 10 20 N S W E C.009 Utility plan Of 11 Pages01HPC Submission07.27.2022VJT#DescriptionDateDrawn By312 West HymanAspen, Colorado 816111101 Village Road, Unit UL-4C Carbondale, CO 81623 (970) 510 - 5312 JKEReviewed ByFor Construction Job #: 22.4202Permit Set10.27.2022VJTJKE SHEET TITLE INTEGRATED DESIGN TEAM PROJECT NO: MODEL FILE: DRAWN BY: COPYRIGHT: SHEET 13 C.010 Jeffrey H Woodruff 312_W_Hyman_03312023.pln Project No. 116 /Users/jeffrey/Documents/Cloud Hill/Rainbow/structural/312_W_Hyman_03312023.plnPowder Day Skiiing, LLC, David A Tarrab Mees Erosion Control 312 W Hyman Ave 312 W Hyman Ave Lots P+Q, Block 46 Aspen CO 81611 USA/ Pitkin County UGB, City of Aspen 312 W Hyman Ave Aspen CO 81611 USA Account # R000145 Parcel ID # 273512464006 Landscape Architect Jennifer M. Dolecki-Smith, RLA Escape Garden Design, LLC Civil Grading and Drainage Jay Engstrom, P.E. Crystal River Civil, LLC Structural Engineer Brian Rossiter, P.E. bwr.pe Contractor COA- HPO Site Visit08/22/21 Jeffrey H. Woodruff AIA, LEED AP Cloud Hill Design, LLC Snowmass CO 81654 USA COA- HPC Conceptual02/26/22 COA- HPC Conceptual04/27/22 COA- HPC Final07/27/22 COA- City Council Call Up10/12/22 COA- HPC Final04/12/23<7902 7902 790279037901 79027 9 0 1 79 0 2 7903 7904 7902 7901Trash and Recycle Construction Office Protect Inlet under Trailer Portable Toilet Concrete Washout Utilize Driveway for Staging Area Protect Inlets Drawing Scale Units (Feet) 1" = 5' 0 5 10NSWE C.010 Erosion Control Of 11 Pages01HPC Submission07.27.2022VJT#DescriptionDateDrawn By312 West HymanAspen, Colorado 816111101 Village Road, Unit UL-4C Carbondale, CO 81623 (970) 510 - 5312 JKEReviewed ByFor Construction Job #: 22.4202Permit Set10.27.2022VJTJKE SHEET TITLE INTEGRATED DESIGN TEAM PROJECT NO: MODEL FILE: DRAWN BY: COPYRIGHT: SHEET 14 C.011 Jeffrey H Woodruff 312_W_Hyman_03312023.pln Project No. 116 /Users/jeffrey/Documents/Cloud Hill/Rainbow/structural/312_W_Hyman_03312023.plnPowder Day Skiiing, LLC, David A Tarrab Mees Details 312 W Hyman Ave 312 W Hyman Ave Lots P+Q, Block 46 Aspen CO 81611 USA/ Pitkin County UGB, City of Aspen 312 W Hyman Ave Aspen CO 81611 USA Account # R000145 Parcel ID # 273512464006 Landscape Architect Jennifer M. Dolecki-Smith, RLA Escape Garden Design, LLC Civil Grading and Drainage Jay Engstrom, P.E. Crystal River Civil, LLC Structural Engineer Brian Rossiter, P.E. bwr.pe Contractor COA- HPO Site Visit08/22/21 Jeffrey H. Woodruff AIA, LEED AP Cloud Hill Design, LLC Snowmass CO 81654 USA COA- HPC Conceptual02/26/22 COA- HPC Conceptual04/27/22 COA- HPC Final07/27/22 COA- City Council Call Up10/12/22 COA- HPC Final04/12/23 6" Of Class 6 Aggregate Base Course Compact to 95% ASTM Standard Proctor 8" Of Crusher Fines Material Concrete With Mortar Set Pavers Patio Detail Not to Scale 6" Of Class 6 Aggregate Base Course Compact to 95% ASTM Standard Proctor 4" Of CDOT Class D Concrete Or Approved Alternate Grading And Layout As Per Plan Welded Wire Set In Concrete Offset From Edge And Base 2" Minimum 6" of Top Soil Revegetate as Necessary Scarify and Recompact Bottom of Excavation to 95% ASTM Standard PRoctor Mortar Set Pavers As Per Landscape/Architectural Drawings Minimum 1" of Mortar Infill Pavers with Specified Grout 24" Wide Trench 6" Depth Bedding Material Below Utility Line 12" Depth Bedding Material Above Utility Line Residential Service Line Gas: Size and Material to be Provided by Black Hills Energy Communications: 2" PVC Conduit Electric: 4" PVC Conduit Verify Size and Material with Utility Provider Prior to Installation Wrap Bedding Material Within Geotextile Fabric Bedding Material 3 4" Screened Rock, Class 6 ABC, Or As Specified By Utility Provider Hardscape Softscape Class 6 ABC or Approved Alternate as per Geotech Native Material as Approved per Geotech Compact to 95% ASTM Standard Proctor Layback as Necessary to meet OSHA Requirements For Specific Soil Type Hardscaping With Sub Base Material See Detail Minimum 6" of Top Soil Revegetate 30" Minimum 72" Maximum Bury Depth Residential Service Gas, Communications, and Secondary Electric Trenching Detail Not to Scale Residential Water and Sanitary Sewer Service and Storm Sewer Trenching Detail 24" Wide Trench 6" Depth Bedding Material Below Utility Line 12" Depth Bedding Material Above Utility Line Residential Service Line Sizing and Material As Per Plan Shown on Utility Sheet Verify Size and Material with Corresponding Utility Jurisdiction Wrap Bedding Material Within Geotextile Fabric Bedding Material 34" Screened Rock, Class 6 ABC, Or As Specified By Utility Provider Hardscape Softscape Class 6 ABC or Approved Alternate as per Geotech Native Material as Approved per Geotech Compact to 95% ASTM Standard Proctor Layback as Necessary to meet OSHA Requirements For Specific Soil Type Hardscaping With Sub Base Material See Detail Minimum 6" of Top Soil Revegetate Bury Depth Water: Minimum 8' Sanitary Sewer: Minimum 5' Storm Sewer: As Per Plan Not to Scale Note: Water and Sanitary Sewer Service Lines Require a Minimum 10' of Separation Note: Gas and Secondary Electric Service Lines Require a Minimum 3' of Separation. Communications and Secondary Electric Require a Minimum 2' of Separation. Stormwater Detention Drywell (WQCV) Detail Not to Scale Hardscape Softscape Wrap Washed Screened Rock Within Geotextile Fabric Perforated Precast Concrete Drywell Rings 4' Height Minimum Hardscaping With Sub Base Material As per Plan Native Material as Approved per Geotech Compact to 95% ASTM Standard Proctor Solid Precast Concrete Drywell Rings Minimum 18" of 1 12" Washed Screened Rock Surrounding Perforated Drywell Rings Layback as Necessary to meet OSHA Requirements For Specific Soil Type Aluminum Steps Cast in Concrete Minimum 6" of Top Soil Revegetate Use a Variation of 1', 2', 3', and 4' Precast Concrete Drywell Rings to Achieve Desired Drywell Depth as per Plan Note: Drywell Diameter, Rim, Sump, and Pipe Inverts are not Referenced in this Detail. Refer to Storm System Plans and Profiles For Additional Design Requirements. Pipe Sleeves can be Precast or Drilled into the Concrete Drywell Rings. Existing Class B Soil 6" Minimum of 3 4" or 11 2" Washed Screened Rock For Leveling Grated Manhole Lid with 6" Tall Frame Risers May be Used for Fine Grading Wrap Washed Screened Rock Within Geotextile Fabric 6" Steel Perforated Pipe Covered In Mirafi Filter Fabric Sock 12"-15" 8" Thick Precast Concrete Lid Section With Rust Resistant Access Hatch With Lifting Handles Solid 8" Thick Precast Concrete Drywell Lid Native Material as Approved per Geotech Compact to 95% ASTM Standard Proctor See Plan For Height Sump Depth as Per Plan and/or Profile Frame and Grate Diameter as Per Plan Grate Style to be Approved by Landscape Design Existing Soil Hardscaping With Sub Base Material See Detail Nyoplast Catch Basin Detail Not to Scale Outgoing Pipe Material Size and Slope as Per Plan and/or Profile Layback as Necessary to meet OSHA Requirements For Specific Soil Type Gravel Driveway Detail Not to Scale 8" Of 3/4" Washed Screened Rock Scarify and Recompact Bottom of Excavation to 95% ASTM Standard Proctor Minimum 6" of Top Soil Revegetate as Necessary Pervious Sandset Flagstone Patio Detail Not to Scale 6" of 3 4" Washed Screened Rock Filter Fabric Below and Above Washed Screened Rock 3" Average Thickness Flagstone Pavers 2" Minimum of Leveling Course and Infill Between Pavers Do Not Compact Grade Below Section Minimum 8% Void Space Between Pavers Crusher Fines Ribbon Driveway Detail Not to Scale Scarify and Recompact Bottom of Excavation to 95% ASTM Standard Proctor 2' Wide Track 2' Wide Track3' Wide Landscape Strip Minimum 6" of Top Soil Revegetate as Necessary Flow Plan View Flow Flow Note: Stakes Shall Be Spaced At 24" Min Horizontal Separation, and 48" Max. Section A-A A AFlow Flow Landscape Inlet Size Ranges From 6" to 24" Diameter or Square FlowSee Section A-A BelowErosion Log Landscape Inlet Size Ranges From 6" to 24" Diameter or Square Erosion Logs Entrench minimum of 2" into Grade Finished Grade Landscape Inlet Protection Detail Not to Scale Flow Plan View FlowFlow Section A-A AAFlow Flow Hardscape Inlet Size Ranges From 6" to 24" Diameter or SquareFlowSee Section A-A Below Aggregate Bags Hardscape Inlet Aggregate Bags Locate on Edges of Hardscaped Areas Finished Grade Hardscape Inlet Protection Detail Not to Scale Install Mirafi 140N Filter Fabric Material Surrounding Crusher Fines C.011 Details Of 11 Pages01HPC Submission07.27.2022VJT#DescriptionDateDrawn By312 West HymanAspen, Colorado 816111101 Village Road, Unit UL-4C Carbondale, CO 81623 (970) 510 - 5312 JKEReviewed ByFor Construction Job #: 22.4202Permit Set10.27.2022VJTJKE SHEET TITLE INTEGRATED DESIGN TEAM PROJECT NO: MODEL FILE: DRAWN BY: COPYRIGHT: SHEET 15 C.012 Jeffrey H Woodruff 312_W_Hyman_03312023.pln Project No. 116 /Users/jeffrey/Documents/Cloud Hill/Rainbow/structural/312_W_Hyman_03312023.plnPowder Day Skiiing, LLC, David A Tarrab Mees Engineering & Drainage Report 312 W Hyman Ave 312 W Hyman Ave Lots P+Q, Block 46 Aspen CO 81611 USA/ Pitkin County UGB, City of Aspen 312 W Hyman Ave Aspen CO 81611 USA Account # R000145 Parcel ID # 273512464006 Landscape Architect Jennifer M. Dolecki-Smith, RLA Escape Garden Design, LLC Civil Grading and Drainage Jay Engstrom, P.E. Crystal River Civil, LLC Structural Engineer Brian Rossiter, P.E. bwr.pe Contractor COA- HPO Site Visit08/22/21 Jeffrey H. Woodruff AIA, LEED AP Cloud Hill Design, LLC Snowmass CO 81654 USA COA- HPC Conceptual02/26/22 COA- HPC Conceptual04/27/22 COA- HPC Final07/27/22 COA- City Council Call Up10/12/22 COA- HPC Final04/12/23 312 West Hyman Avenue Drainage Report October 27, 2022 Prepared By: Jay Engstrom, P.E. Crystal River Civil, LLC Carbondale, CO 81623 Jay@crystalrivercivil.com (970) 510-5312 Crystal River Civil LLC 970.510.5312 Page 2 of 11 Table of Contents 1.0 General Information ......................................................................................................... 3 1.1 Existing Conditions ...................................................................................................... 3 1.2 Proposed Conditions .................................................................................................... 4 2.0 Drainage Basins and Subbasins ...................................................................................... 4 2.1 Onsite Drainage Basins ............................................................................................... 4 2.2 Offsite Drainage Basins ............................................................................................... 5 3.0 Low Impact Site Design ................................................................................................... 5 3.1 Principles ..................................................................................................................... 5 4.0 Hydrologic Criteria ........................................................................................................... 7 4.1 Runoff Calculation Method ........................................................................................... 7 4.2 Basin Analysis ............................................................................................................. 7 4.3 Sub Basin Analysis ...................................................................................................... 8 4.4 Water Quality and Storage Requirements .................................................................... 8 5.0 Hydraulic Criteria ............................................................................................................. 9 5.1 Inlets ............................................................................................................................ 9 5.2 Pipes............................................................................................................................ 9 6.0 Proposed Facilities .........................................................................................................10 6.1 Drywells ......................................................................................................................10 7.0 Operation and Maintenance ...........................................................................................11 7.1 Drywell ........................................................................................................................11 7.2 Inlets ...........................................................................................................................11 Crystal River Civil LLC 970.510.5312 Page 3 of 11 1.0 General Information 1.1 Existing Conditions The property being discussed in this drainage report is addressed at 312 West Hyman Avenue, Aspen, Colorado 81611. The site is located within the City of Aspen in the area known as the “West End” near Main Street. It is documented as parcel # 273512464006 and is described as City and Townsite of Aspen Block: 46 Lot: P and Lot: Q. The property is in the middle of the West Hyman Avenue block, between South 2nd Street and South 3rd Street, and is surrounded by other residential developments. 312 West Hyman Avenue Vicinity Map The property is currently developed with a single-family residence with well-established trees and landscaping features surrounding the structure. An at grade, flagstone patio is located at the western face of the structure. A wood deck is located at the upper level to the south, looking towards West Hyman Ave. The topography of the site is relatively flat, with the house being located at a subtle low point of the parcel. The driveway access point is located off West Hyman Ave and connects onto the property at an angle that cuts through the neighbor’s property. This is a short, gravel driveway that accesses the existing garage within the structure. The majority of the existing utility infrastructure is found in the alleyway at the northern property line. Services for sanitary sewer and gas extend directly north. An electric transformer and communications pedestals are located at the northeast corner of the parcel, which services to the property tie into. Water service to the property is located to the south, with a tap under the West Hyman Avenue. Crystal River Civil LLC 970.510.5312 Page 4 of 11 1.2 Proposed Conditions The proposed conditions at 312 West Hyman Ave. include the remodel of the existing residence on the parcel, a small addition off the rear of the structure, and the addition of a detached garage located at the northwester property corner, accessed via the gravel alley. The project is considered a “Major Project” per Table 1.1 of the City of Aspen Urban Runoff Management Plan, or URMP. The parcel is zoned for residential use and will not require a change in land use or zoning. A series of patios and walkways are proposed around the property. The majority of these patios are pervious, and a thorough planting plan is proposed for landscaping the existing site. The existing driveway in front of the residence will be removed and replaced with landscaping and concrete driving strips to minimize visual impacts. A patio and a spa are proposed on the east side of the residence. Access to the proposed garage will be from the alleyway, which a gravel drive will extend from the alleyway. The water service, communications, and electric services will all remain and are not impacted by the proposed conditions. The sewer service will be realigned to go around the proposed garage, as well as the gas service. The existing boxes on the residence will have to be relocated onto the proposed addition during construction, as they are located where the addition is occurring. The proposed design also includes the construction of a drainage system that will manage all stormwater on the site. As required for designated “Major Projects”, the site requires a stormwater design that meets the requirements of the URMP. This includes conveyance of major flows as well as detention to eliminate additional flow rates from the development. The roof structure will collect runoff through roof drains and gutters with downspouts. The roof area will tie into the surrounding storm system. Several inlets located around the residences will collect any runoff from landscaped areas. The garage access runoff is collected through an inlet located just downhill. The majority of this runoff is conveyed to an onsite drywell located to the northeast of the residence within a patio. An existing drywell will be utilized to collect the runoff from the deck on the south of the residence as it did previously. An additional inlet will be added next to the existing drywell to mitigate the stormwater from the concrete driving strips in front of the residence. Due to the site constraints, the drywells were verified to fully detain all runoff from the impervious areas from the development, since there is no overflow path available. Currently there are no known studies performed on or around the site. The project is not within a mudflow area defined within the URMP. Given that the proposed project is capturing and treating all stormwater from impervious areas for full detention, the project will not impact downstream properties, Right-Of-Ways, or stormwater systems. 2.0 Drainage Basins and Subbasins 2.1 Onsite Drainage Basins The site has been analyzed as two drainage basins that contain the entirety of the proposed development. The point of concentration for the basins will be the proposed drywell as well as the existing driveway. Crystal River Civil LLC 970.510.5312 Page 5 of 11 Basin 1 is proposed as 4,833 square feet and is 43% impervious. This area includes existing and proposed roof areas, the proposed garage and access, patios, spa, and the pervious walkways surrounding the residence. The basin is collected by downspouts from the roof structure and several inlets surrounding the residence. All stormwater is conveyed to Drywell 1. Drywell 1 has been sized to have enough capacity for the full detention volume for the impervious areas collected. It has a storage depth of eight feet (10.5 feet rim to sump depth) and a six-foot perforated section. Basin 2 is an existing system with some minor alterations and is 1,735 square feet and 20% impervious. The deck on the south side of the residence currently drains into a four foot diameter drywell ten feet deep, which for this analysis has been labeled Drywell 2. In addition to the existing drainage, an inlet is being added to collect drainage off the front landscaped area and concrete driving strips. This basin was analyzed to verify that the existing system has capacity for full detention of a 100-year, 1-hour storm event. 2.2 Offsite Drainage Basins No offsite drainage basins impact the proposed development. No offsite drainage analysis is included within this report. 3.0 Low Impact Site Design Low Impact Development (LID) aims to mimic the natural pre-development hydrologic patterns. The goal is to manage storm water as close to its source as is possible. The captured onsite basin is 37% impervious. 3.1 Principles Principle 1: Consider storm water quality needs early in the design process. The design team coordinated throughout the schematic design phase to minimize the impacts to the site, while effectively designing a stormwater system that meets requirements and needs. It was understood that the footprint of the building, existing trees, and the historic relevance was going to drive the design to minimize at-grade infrastructure and site disturbance. Principle 2: Use the entire site when planning for storm water quality treatment. Given the existing conditions, minimal space could be utilized for stormwater collection and treatment. Because of this, a drywell was proposed in a location with the least impact to the existing structure and the trees. Patios are proposed as pervious, and areas are sloped to sheetflow through landscaped areas into inlets to allow for a treatment train prior to entering the storm networks. Principle 3: Avoid unnecessary impervious area. The proposed hardscaping is kept at a minimum to reduce impervious areas. Sand set sandstone pavers were utilized to promote infiltration into the ground in most areas. All areas outside of the foundation footprint are pervious, excluding the driveway and the patio next to the spa. Principle 4: Reduce runoff rates and volumes to more closely match natural conditions. Crystal River Civil LLC 970.510.5312 Page 6 of 11 All runoff from impervious surfaces on the property is collected and conveyed to drywells, which have been sized for 100-year storm event full detention volume. The proposed onsite detention ultimately reduces the amount of drainage flows into the Right-of-Way and encourages high rates of infiltration. Principle 5: Integrate storm water quality management and flood control. A new drywell is proposed onsite, which is designed to capture and treat stormwater for the entire site. This drywell has been sized for full detention of a 100-year 1-hour storm event, which will eliminate any flooding impacts in Aspen that would be generated from this site. The existing stormwater detention structures are to be utilized after inspection. Principle 6: Develop storm water quality facilities that enhance the site, the community, and the environment. The proposed stormwater system is designed to be treated onsite and will reduce the runoff into the public Right-of-Way system. This will minimize ice buildup in the alleyway and impacts of stormwater on neighboring residences from the existing residence. The design allows for more than adequate drainage while having minimal visual impacts. Full detention of the stormwater increases the infiltration amount, which has a positive impact on groundwater. Principle 7: Use treatment train approach. The design proposes patios to release into landscaping to allow treatment prior to entering the storm system in multiple areas on the site. Sumps are proposed for the inlets in the pipe network to ensure treatment throughout the system. The filtration system within the dual chamber drywell allows for an additional treatment level prior to infiltration. Principle 8: Design sustainable facilities that can be safely maintained. Inlets, piping, and the drywells will be vacuumed or flushed periodically, as specified in the maintenance section of this drainage report, to maintain adequate flows as designed. The designed system includes cleanouts at roof drain connections and downspouts, simplified collection systems that minimize maintenance, and easy access to the whole system. The dual chamber drywell minimizes clogging and allows for maintenance of the system for longevity. Principle 9: Design and maintain facilities with public safety in mind. The proposed design for driveway and walkways allows for adequate drainage and reduces ice buildup and dangerous conditions. Walkways and stairways are pitched at recommended slopes and within building code thresholds to allow for safe circulation within the property. Grading has been kept to a minimum and retainage has been minimized. Transitions into existing conditions are smooth and natural. Full detention of stormwater minimizes the impacts of runoff onto streets and alleyways, minimizing erosion, road damage, and icy conditions. SHEET TITLE INTEGRATED DESIGN TEAM PROJECT NO: MODEL FILE: DRAWN BY: COPYRIGHT: SHEET 16 C.013 Jeffrey H Woodruff 312_W_Hyman_03312023.pln Project No. 116 /Users/jeffrey/Documents/Cloud Hill/Rainbow/structural/312_W_Hyman_03312023.plnPowder Day Skiiing, LLC, David A Tarrab Mees Engineering & Drainage Report 312 W Hyman Ave 312 W Hyman Ave Lots P+Q, Block 46 Aspen CO 81611 USA/ Pitkin County UGB, City of Aspen 312 W Hyman Ave Aspen CO 81611 USA Account # R000145 Parcel ID # 273512464006 Landscape Architect Jennifer M. Dolecki-Smith, RLA Escape Garden Design, LLC Civil Grading and Drainage Jay Engstrom, P.E. Crystal River Civil, LLC Structural Engineer Brian Rossiter, P.E. bwr.pe Contractor COA- HPO Site Visit08/22/21 Jeffrey H. Woodruff AIA, LEED AP Cloud Hill Design, LLC Snowmass CO 81654 USA COA- HPC Conceptual02/26/22 COA- HPC Conceptual04/27/22 COA- HPC Final07/27/22 COA- City Council Call Up10/12/22 COA- HPC Final04/12/23 Crystal River Civil LLC 970.510.5312 Page 7 of 11 4.0 Hydrologic Criteria 4.1 Runoff Calculation Method Calculations and analyses defined in Chapter 2 and Chapter 3 of the URMP were used to define the runoff from the basins on the property. The property is classified as a “Sub-urban area not served by public storm sewer.” Pre-developed and developed runoff rates were determined for both the 10-year, 1-hour and the 100-year, 1-hour storm events for capacity designs as required by this classification. The basins defined for the project can be seen on the basins sheet of the civil set. The peak discharge shown in this analysis uses the Rational Method, as described in section 3.4 of the URMP. This requires several variables to be determined, including values for intensity, the runoff coefficient, and basin area. Using the rainfall depths from Table 2-2 and the basin time of concentration in conjunction with Equation 2-1, the rainfall intensity for the basins can be calculated. The rainfall intensity equation shown in the URMP is a direct correlation of the Aspen area Intensity Duration Frequency Curve derived from the NOAA Atlas 14 database. As stated within the URMP, the time of concentration can be no less than 5 minutes for the calculations to be effective. Due to the size of the basins on the site, the time of concentration within the basins is less than 5 minutes. The runoff coefficient for each basin was established using the percent impervious of the basin and the soil type in combination with the most up-to-date values as presented in the Mile High Flood District Drainage Design Values for the specified soil type in the area. For this project, an NRCS Soil Classification of B was utilized. 4.2 Basin Analysis The tables below summarize the calculations that were performed on the basins using the methods described in Section 4.1 of this report. Rainfall depth, P1 (in)0.771 Soil Class B Intensity (in/hr)Discharge (ft3/Sec)Q=CIA t Note: For basins with a flow length of less than 500 feet, a Time of Concentration is assumed at 5 minutes. These calculations are assuming a NRCS Hydrologic Soil Class B. Rainfall depth values derived from NOAA Atlas 14 data. Intensity equation has been derived from the Aspen area NOAA Atlas 14 IDF Curve. Predeveloped Conditions Basin Total Area Impervious Area Percent Impervious C Value Time of Concentration Intensity Peak Discharge (Name)At (ft2)Ai (ft2)Ai/A t (%) Tc (min)I (in/hr)Qp (ft3/sec) 1 4833.00 0.00 0.00%0.040 5 3.96 0.02 2 1735.00 0.00 0.00%0.040 5 3.96 0.01 Developed Conditions Basin Total Area Impervious Area Percent Impervious C Value Time of Concentration Intensity Peak Discharge (Name)At (ft2)Ai (ft2)Ai/A t (%) Tc (min)I (in/hr)Qd (ft3/sec) 1 4833.00 2094.00 43.33%0.380 5 3.96 0.17 2 1735.00 340.00 19.60%0.180 5 3.96 0.03 10-Year 1-Hour Onsite Peak Discharge Calculations I =88.8P1 (10 +Td)1.052 Crystal River Civil LLC 970.510.5312 Page 8 of 11 4.3 Sub Basin Analysis In addition to determining the peak discharge from basins, the areas are then subdivided into sub basins to calculate their peak discharges. This allows for verification that all pipes and intakes into the proposed conveyance structures have capacity. The URMP requires all structures to have capacity for a 100-year, 1-hour storm event. Using the same procedure discussed in 2.1 of this drainage report, the peak discharge of each sub basin was determined. Below is a table summarizing the values required for the sub basin analysis. 4.4 Water Quality and Storage Requirements For a property classified as a “Sub-urban area not served by public storm sewer”, runoff from the site must meet the predeveloped peak discharge of a 100-year, 1-hour storm event. Full detention volume is detained on site due to the lack of infrastructure downhill of the site. All equations used in the spreadsheets are directly from the URMP. A full detention analysis of the drainage basins has been completed. The full detention volume is calculated using the impervious area on the site and multiplying by the 100-year, 1-hour rainfall depth found in the NOAA Atlas 14 database. The calculation that has been used to determine the full detention volume required to be detained on the property is shown in the spreadsheet below. Rainfall depth, P1 (in)1.23 Soil Class B Intensity (in/hr)Discharge (ft3/Sec)Q=CIAt Note: For basins with a flow length of less than 500 feet, a Time of Concentration is assumed at 5 minutes. These calculations are assuming a NRCS Hydrologic Soil Class B. Rainfall depth values derived from NOAA Atlas 14 data. Intensity equation has been derived from the Aspen area NOAA Atlas 14 IDF Curve. Predeveloped Conditions Basin Total Area Impervious Area Percent Impervious C Value Time of Concentration Intensity Peak Discharge (Name)At (ft2)Ai (ft2)Ai/At (%) Tc (min)I (in/hr)Qp (ft3/sec) 1 4833.00 0.00 0.00%0.430 5 6.33 0.30 2 1735.00 0.00 0.00%0.430 5 6.33 0.11 Developed Conditions Basin Total Area Impervious Area Percent Impervious C Value Time of Concentration Intensity Peak Discharge (Name)At (ft2)Ai (ft2)Ai/At (%) Tc (min)I (in/hr)Qd (ft3/sec) 1 4833.00 2094.00 43.33%0.610 5 6.33 0.43 2 1735.00 340.00 19.60%0.500 5 6.33 0.13 100-Year 1-Hour Onsite Peak Discharge Calculations I =88.8P1 (10 +Td)1.052 Rainfall depth, P1 (in)1.23 Soil Class B Intensity (in/hr)Discharge (ft3/Sec)Q=CIAt The values shown in this table are analysing a 100-Year 1-Hour Storm Event. For basins with a flow length of less than 500 feet, a Time of Concentration of 5 minutes is assumed. Developed Conditions Sub Basin Total Area Impervious Area Percent Impervious C Value Time of Concentration Intensity Flow Rate (Name)At (ft2)Ai (ft2)Ai/At (%)C (From Table) To (min)I (in/hr)Qs (ft3/sec) 1.1 1456.00 0.00 0.00%0.43 5 6.33 0.09 1.2 639.00 639.00 100.00%0.89 5 6.33 0.08 1.3 400.00 15.00 3.75%0.44 5 6.33 0.03 1.4 537.00 0.00 0.00%0.43 5 6.33 0.03 1.5 227.00 227.00 100.00%0.89 5 6.33 0.03 1.6 281.00 223.00 79.36%0.78 5 6.33 0.03 1.7 263.00 263.00 100.00%0.89 5 6.33 0.03 1.8 355.00 52.00 14.65%0.47 5 6.33 0.02 1.9 675.00 675.00 100.00%0.89 5 6.33 0.09 2.1 145.00 145.00 100.00%0.89 5 6.33 0.02 2.2 1590.00 195.00 12.26%0.47 5 6.33 0.11 Basin Flow Rate Calculations I =88.8P1 (10 +Td )1.052 Crystal River Civil LLC 970.510.5312 Page 9 of 11 As required by the City of Aspen, a drywell must be sized for the capacity determined from the full detention volume calculation for a 100-year, 1-hour storm if no overflow path for the BMP is available. Since both drywells have been sized for full detention, the Water Quality Capture Volume for the onsite basin has been fulfilled. This volume will be used to adequately size the onsite drywell. 5.0 Hydraulic Criteria The following analyses were performed using the peak flows of the sub basins described in Section 4.2 of this report. 5.1 Inlets The peak flows for the 100-year, 1-hour storm event in each sub-basin were used to size the proposed inlets. Equations 4.17 through 4.20 from the URMP were used in these calculations. The equations incorporate a 50 percent clogging factor and assume a 40 percent opening in the grates. Water depths used in these calculations are based on the grading around each inlet and safe ponding levels above the inlets. Each inlet takes the smaller value of the weir intersection capacity and the orifice opening capacity, whichever is the smallest. The proposed dimensions of each inlet must be greater than the subbasin peak flow for the 100-year, 1-hour storm. The tables below summarize the calculations for each inlet as well as for the trench drains. 5.2 Pipes The pipes were sized using the calculated flows from the sub-basins that release into them through inlets and downspouts. The Time of Concentration (TOC) is below 5 minutes for all sub- basins, so a reduction was not taken for the intensity. Depth of flow was also calculated in the spreadsheets below to verify requirements set within the URMP. The pipes are all SDR-35 PVC with a manning’s coefficient of .01. Design Q design / Q full values were compared to the wetted area over the diameter squared for each pipe to generate the correct depth of water over diameter Basin Point of Concentration Total Area Impervious Area Impervious Full Detention Depth Factor of Safety Full Detention Storage (Name)(name)(ft2)(ft2)(%)(in)(FOS)(ft3) 1 Drywell 1 4833.00 2094.00 43.33%1.23 1 215 2 Drywell 2 1735.00 340.00 19.60%1.23 1 35 Full Detention Storage Effective Inlet Area, Ae (ft2)Inlet Orifice Capacity, Qo (ft3/s)Weir Flow Capacity, Qw (ft3/s) Orifice Coefficient, Co 0.65 Clogging Factor, Cg 0.5 Area Opening Capacity Ratio, m Weir Coefficient, Cw 3 Water Depth Above Inlet, Ys (ft)0.25 Effective Weir Length, Pe (ft) Inlet Associated Subbasin Inlet Diameter Effective Inlet Area Orifice Flow Capacity Weir Flow Capacity Subbasin Flow (Name)(Name)De (in)Ae (ft2)Qo (ft3/s)Qw (ft3/s)Q (ft3/s) A1-Inlet 1.1 8 0.10 0.27 0.79 0.09 A5-Inlet 1.3 8 0.10 0.27 0.79 0.03 A7-Inlet 1.4 8 0.10 0.27 0.79 0.03 C1-Inlet 1.6 8 0.10 0.27 0.79 0.03 D1-Inlet 1.8 8 0.10 0.27 0.79 0.02 E4-Inlet 2.2 8 0.10 0.27 0.79 0.11 Round Inlet Capacity Calculation 0.6 Ae =1 −Cg (π(De/12 2 )2)m Qo =Co Ae 2gYs Qw =Cw Pe Ys1.5 Pe =1 −Cg P Crystal River Civil LLC 970.510.5312 Page 10 of 11 pipe. All these ratio values are derived from the Manning’s Equation for partially full pipes. The equations in Section 4.8.4 were used as the basis for these calculations. As specified in the URMP, each pipe was confirmed to be less than 80% full for the 100-year, 1-hour storm event. Design charts giving Qdesign / Q full were downloaded from FHWA and the equations in Section 4.8.4 were used as the basis for these calculations. Calculated pipe sizes and depth of flow for onsite pipes are shown below. 6.0 Proposed Facilities 6.1 Drywells The proposed dual chamber drywell meets the requirements of the URMP. The sizing of the drywell is determined using the capacity calculations summarized in Section 4.4 of this drainage report. Below is a summary showing the drywell dimensions to verify it has capacity. The chamber divider, conical section, and sloped manhole lid were not included in these dimensions, which is why the proposed drywells exceed the storage depth shown in the calculations. Also shown in this table is Drywell 2, which is an existing drywell that is being verified to have capacity for the proposed conditions. Mannings Equation (ft3/s)0.01 Note: Pipe Flow Rate (Q p) is the summation of the flow rates from the the collected sub basins through each pipe, or Qs. Pipe Collected Sub Basins Pipe Flow Rate Slope Min. Pipe Diameter Prop. Pipe Diameter Pipe Max Flow Rate Percent of Capacity d/D Flow Depth Pipe Depth Percent (Name)(#)Qp (ft3/sec)S (%) Dm(in) Dp(in)Qc (ft3/s) Qp/Qc (%)(Chart)d (%) A1 1.1 0.09 1.00%2.8 4 0.248 37%0.39 1.56 39% A2 1.1 0.09 1.00%2.8 4 0.248 37%0.39 1.56 39% A3 1.1 0.09 1.00%2.8 4 0.248 37%0.39 1.56 39% A4 1.2 0.08 1.00%2.7 4 0.248 33%0.36 1.44 36% A5 1.1-1.3 0.20 1.00%3.7 4 0.248 80%0.74 2.96 74% A6 1.1-1.3 0.20 1.00%3.7 4 0.248 80%0.74 2.96 74% A7 1.1-1.4 0.23 1.00%3.9 6 0.731 32%0.35 2.10 35% A8 1.1-1.4 0.23 1.00%3.9 6 0.731 32%0.35 2.10 35% A9 1.1-1.4, 1.8-1.9 0.34 1.00%4.5 6 0.731 47%0.47 2.82 47% B1 1.5 0.03 2.00%1.6 4 0.351 8%0.13 0.52 13% B2 1.5 0.03 2.00%1.6 4 0.351 8%0.13 0.52 13% C1 1.6 0.03 5.00%1.4 4 0.555 6%0.10 0.40 10% C2 1.6 0.03 5.00%1.4 4 0.555 6%0.10 0.40 10% C3 1.7 0.03 5.00%1.4 4 0.555 6%0.11 0.44 11% C4 1.6-1.7 0.07 5.00%1.8 4 0.555 12%0.17 0.68 17% C5 1.6-1.7 0.07 5.00%1.8 4 0.555 12%0.17 0.68 17% C6 1.6-1.7 0.07 5.00%1.8 4 0.555 12%0.17 0.68 17% D1 1.8 0.02 2.00%1.5 4 0.351 7%0.12 0.48 12% D2 1.9 0.09 2.00%2.4 4 0.351 25%0.29 1.16 29% D3 1.8-1.9 0.11 2.00%2.6 4 0.351 32%0.35 1.40 35% D4 1.8-1.9 0.11 2.00%2.6 4 0.351 32%0.35 1.40 35% E1 (Exist)2.1 0.02 2.00%1.3 4 0.351 5%0.10 0.40 10% E2 (Exist)2.1 0.02 2.00%1.3 4 0.351 5%0.10 0.40 10% E3 (Exist)2.1 0.02 2.00%1.3 4 0.351 5%0.10 0.40 10% E4 2.2 0.11 2.00%2.6 4 0.351 31%0.34 1.36 34% Pipe Sectional Area (ft2)Manning Coefficient, n Min. Pipe Diameter, Eq. 4-31 (ft) City of Aspen Pipe Capacity Calculations Ap =π Dp 2 2 Qc = 1.49 n Ap Dp 48 2 3� SDm=nQp k s 3/8 Drywell Name Associated Basin Drywell Diameter Storage Height Gravel Height Internal Capacity External Capacity Combined Capacity Calculated Volume Necessary (Name)(Name)d (ft)h (ft)hg (ft)Vi (ft3)Ve (ft3) V (ft3)(ft3) A 1 5 8 6 157.08 81.29 238.37 214.64 B 2 4 10 4 125.66 44.77 170.43 34.85 Storage Calculation - Drywells Internal Capacity, Vi (ft3)External Capacity,Ve (ft3)Combined Capacity, V (ft3)Vi =hπ(d 2)2 Ve =hg(π(d +1.5 2 )2 −π(d 2)2)V =Vi +Ve Crystal River Civil LLC 970.510.5312 Page 11 of 11 7.0 Operation and Maintenance 7.1 Drywell The drywell shall be inspected and maintained at least every three months to remove any sediment, contaminants, and debris that has settled in the drywell. At minimum, the inspection and maintenance of the drywell shall include the following steps: • Drywell shall be continuously inspected. At minimum, every three months and after every storm event greater than ½ inches. • Remove and dispose of any sediment, solids, debris, and any other waste. All material removed from drywell shall be disposed of at a fitting disposal site and shall meet/comply with all local, State, and Federal waste regulations/jurisdictions. • Regularly inspect the drywells functionality in respect to the time it takes for water to drain in the drywell to mee the maximum required infiltration time of 24 hours is not exceeded. When drain down times in the drywell are larger than 24 hours, the drywell shall be drained via pumping and the infiltrative area of the drywell shall be cleaned and all perforation in the drywell shall be thoroughly washed out. If irregular drainage of the drywell continues as described above, the system may be required to be replaced. 7.2 Inlets Drains shall be inspected and maintained on a regular basis to prevent any clogging and debris from entering the storm system to provide correct functionality. Grates and the adjacent areas to the inlets shall be kept clean and clear of any leaves, soil, and any other solid waste materials to prevent clogging or larger materials from entering in the storm system. Drain sumps and catch basins shall be inspected, at the very minimum, every three months and for each storm event that is greater than ½ inches in depth. All sediment shall be cleaned out or vacuumed from the drain and catch basin. All sediment shall be disposed of correctly, meeting local jurisdictional codes and requirements. Any damage to the grate and the surrounding concrete shall be repaired correctly to maintain functionality of the drain. The grate shall be replaced if excessive damage is present. SHEET TITLE INTEGRATED DESIGN TEAM PROJECT NO: MODEL FILE: DRAWN BY: COPYRIGHT: SHEET 17 L.2.001 Jeffrey H Woodruff 312_W_Hyman_03312023.pln Project No. 116 /Users/jeffrey/Documents/Cloud Hill/Rainbow/structural/312_W_Hyman_03312023.plnPowder Day Skiiing, LLC, David A Tarrab Mees Tree Removal and Mitigation 312 W Hyman Ave 312 W Hyman Ave Lots P+Q, Block 46 Aspen CO 81611 USA/ Pitkin County UGB, City of Aspen 312 W Hyman Ave Aspen CO 81611 USA Account # R000145 Parcel ID # 273512464006 Landscape Architect Jennifer M. Dolecki-Smith, RLA Escape Garden Design, LLC Civil Grading and Drainage Jay Engstrom, P.E. Crystal River Civil, LLC Structural Engineer Brian Rossiter, P.E. bwr.pe Contractor COA- HPO Site Visit08/22/21 Jeffrey H. Woodruff AIA, LEED AP Cloud Hill Design, LLC Snowmass CO 81654 USA COA- HPC Conceptual02/26/22 COA- HPC Conceptual04/27/22 COA- HPC Final07/27/22 COA- City Council Call Up10/12/22 COA- HPC Final04/12/23 38 sq ft A A B B C C D D E E 4 4 3 3 2 2 1 1 F/R16'-0 "43'-0"32'-7"23'-9"16'-3"1'-6 2 1 / 3 2 " 2'-4 7 / 8 "5'-0"11'-8 5 / 3 2 " 8'-2"10'-2"10'-0"4'-3"9'-0"11'-9"19'-3"32'-7"2'-0"5'-6 1/4"3'-1 5 1 / 6 4 "10'-5 15/32"21'-4 11/64"100' = 7901.31' 100' 100' = 7901.31' 1 A300 1 A301 2 A301 2 A300 4 Z004 1 A200 2 A200 2 Z003 2 A210 1 A211 3 A211 4 A211 #DrgID #LayID 2 A402 6 A401 4 A403 2 A404 3 A405 1 A408 1 A407 trees protected #3, #4, and # 5 to NE Plaster covered CMU wall with two layers of 5/8" Type X Gypsum, 1 hour fire wall, Cementitious soffit Proposed fence at the 5' side setback and 5' rear setback, lined on the South with shrubs, see landscaping plan St Moritz R e t a i n i n g w a l l ( n e w , plum and 2 ' f r o m p r o p e r t y l i n e ) Removal of T r e e # 2 Removal of T r e e # 1 Existing dry well With new p l u m r e t a i n i n g w a l l , structure is 7 . 0 0 1 ' f r o m t h e nearest stu c t u r e UP bedroom #2 bathe #3 mechanical #2, hw, wstrash, c o m p o s t , r e c y c l i n g bathe #2 closet boot c u b b i e s & benc h bedroom #3 main entry heat pumps (2) electric meters (2) gas & radon egress egress egress entry w/d garden storage 1/2 bathe cabinet 312 West Hyman Garage F.F.E. = 7902.86 312 West Hyman "Bedroom" F.F.E. = 7901.31 F.F.E. = 7901.36' F.F.E. = 7901.36' F.F.E. = 7901.33' niche mirror benchmud hooks bench hall closetopen shelvescounterfireplace appliance old 100, cubbies mechanical#11 A400 308 sq ft 1,210.75 sq ft 5.00 1 '11.313'E EG OS W7904790379027901 7901 7901 79 0 2 7902 790379 0 3 7 9 0 4 Grav e l o f f alley 7901+ 7902.75 + 7901.36 7901.32 + + 7901.30 7901.32 + + 7901.23 + 7902.98 + 7906.99 + 7902.86 + 7902.80 + 7901.26 + 7901.23 + Inlet 7901.11 + Inlet 7901.11 + 7901.64 7901.33 + + 7901.32 + 7901.23 + 7901.13 + 7901.13 + 7901.13 2% + 7901.29 + 7901.29 + 7901.33 7901.23 + + 7902.98 7902.39 + 7901.81 + 3' 2'-6" X XTree #1 to be Removed 30" DBH Tree #2 to be Removed 16" DBH Mitigation Trees eight 4" Aspens 8 0 8 16 Scale 1" = 8' SHEET TITLE INTEGRATED DESIGN TEAM PROJECT NO: MODEL FILE: DRAWN BY: COPYRIGHT: SHEET 18 L.2.002 Jeffrey H Woodruff 312_W_Hyman_03312023.pln Project No. 116 /Users/jeffrey/Documents/Cloud Hill/Rainbow/structural/312_W_Hyman_03312023.plnPowder Day Skiiing, LLC, David A Tarrab Mees Proposed Landscape Plan 312 W Hyman Ave 312 W Hyman Ave Lots P+Q, Block 46 Aspen CO 81611 USA/ Pitkin County UGB, City of Aspen 312 W Hyman Ave Aspen CO 81611 USA Account # R000145 Parcel ID # 273512464006 Landscape Architect Jennifer M. Dolecki-Smith, RLA Escape Garden Design, LLC Civil Grading and Drainage Jay Engstrom, P.E. Crystal River Civil, LLC Structural Engineer Brian Rossiter, P.E. bwr.pe Contractor COA- HPO Site Visit08/22/21 Jeffrey H. Woodruff AIA, LEED AP Cloud Hill Design, LLC Snowmass CO 81654 USA COA- HPC Conceptual02/26/22 COA- HPC Conceptual04/27/22 COA- HPC Final07/27/22 COA- City Council Call Up10/12/22 COA- HPC Final04/12/23 38 sq ft A A B B C C D D E E 4 4 3 3 2 2 1 1 F/R16'-0 "43'-0"32'-7"23'-9"16'-3"1'-6 2 1 / 3 2 " 2'-4 7 / 8 "5'-0"11'-8 5 / 3 2 " 8'-2"10'-2"10'-0"4'-3"9'-0"11'-9"19'-3"32'-7"2'-0"5'-6 1/4"3'-1 5 1 / 6 4 "10'-5 15/32"21'-4 11/64"100' = 7901.31' 100' 100' = 7901.31' 1 A300 1 A301 2 A301 2 A300 4 Z004 1 A200 2 A200 2 Z003 2 A210 1 A211 3 A211 4 A211 #DrgID #LayID 2 A402 6 A401 4 A403 2 A404 3 A405 1 A408 1 A407 trees protected #3, #4, and # 5 to NE Plaster covered CMU wall with two layers of 5/8" Type X Gypsum, 1 hour fire wall, Cementitious soffit Proposed fence at the 5' side setback and 5' rear setback, lined on the South with shrubs, see landscaping plan St Moritz R e t a i n i n g w a l l ( n e w , plum and 2 ' f r o m p r o p e r t y l i n e ) Removal of T r e e # 2 Removal of T r e e # 1 Existing dry well With new p l u m r e t a i n i n g w a l l , structure is 7 . 0 0 1 ' f r o m t h e nearest stu c t u r e UP bedroom #2 bathe #3 mechanical #2, hw, wstrash, c o m p o s t , r e c y c l i n g bathe #2 closet boot c u b b i e s & benc h bedroom #3 main entry heat pumps (2) electric meters (2) gas & radon egress egress egress entry w/d garden storage 1/2 bathe cabinet 312 West Hyman Garage F.F.E. = 7902.86 312 West Hyman "Bedroom" F.F.E. = 7901.31 F.F.E. = 7901.36' F.F.E. = 7901.36' F.F.E. = 7901.33' niche mirror benchmud hooks bench hall closetopen shelvescounterfireplace appliance old 100, cubbies mechanical#11 A400 308 sq ft 1,210.75 sq ft 5.00 1 '11.313'E EG OS W7904790379027901 7901 7901 79 0 2 7902 790379 0 3 7 9 0 4 Grav e l o f f alley 7901+ 7902.75 + 7901.36 7901.32 + + 7901.30 7901.32 + + 7901.23 + 7902.98 + 7906.99 + 7902.86 + 7902.80 + 7901.26 + 7901.23 + Inlet 7901.11 + Inlet 7901.11 + 7901.64 7901.33 + + 7901.32 + 7901.23 + 7901.13 + 7901.13 + 7901.13 2% + 7901.29 + 7901.29 + 7901.33 7901.23 + + 7902.98 7902.39 + 7901.81 + 3' 2'-6" 8 0 8 16 Scale 1" = 8' • HPC Granted a 7.4' combined side yard set back at Final 2022 • Requesting 5.4' Combined side yard setback at Susbtantial 2023 (East @ 2.4 + West @ 3). Change requested given new plumb retaining wall @ St Moritz at 2' from the property line (leaving 5' between the 6' retaining wall and the single story garage). HPC is the decision making body for the variance. SHEET TITLE INTEGRATED DESIGN TEAM PROJECT NO: MODEL FILE: DRAWN BY: COPYRIGHT: SHEET 22 S 1.2 Jeffrey H Woodruff 312_W_Hyman_03312023.pln Project No. 116 /Users/jeffrey/Documents/Cloud Hill/Rainbow/structural/312_W_Hyman_03312023.plnPowder Day Skiiing, LLC, David A Tarrab Mees Roof Framing Plan 312 W Hyman Ave 312 W Hyman Ave Lots P+Q, Block 46 Aspen CO 81611 USA/ Pitkin County UGB, City of Aspen 312 W Hyman Ave Aspen CO 81611 USA Account # R000145 Parcel ID # 273512464006 Landscape Architect Jennifer M. Dolecki-Smith, RLA Escape Garden Design, LLC Civil Grading and Drainage Jay Engstrom, P.E. Crystal River Civil, LLC Structural Engineer Brian Rossiter, P.E. bwr.pe Contractor COA- HPO Site Visit08/22/21 Jeffrey H. Woodruff AIA, LEED AP Cloud Hill Design, LLC Snowmass CO 81654 USA COA- HPC Conceptual02/26/22 COA- HPC Conceptual04/27/22 COA- HPC Final07/27/22 COA- City Council Call Up10/12/22 COA- HPC Final04/12/23 ROOF FRAMING PLAN SCALE: 1/4" = 1'-0" N TRUE PLAN NOTES: 1.SEE S0.0 FOR SYMBOLS LEGEND, ABBREVIATIONS, TYPICAL DETAILS, AND GENERAL NOTES. 2.ALL ELEVATIONS ARE BASED ON A REFERENCE ELEVATION OF 100'-0" AT THE MAIN FLOOR AND DO NOT REFLECT ACTUAL SITE ELEVATIONS. 3.ALL POSTS ARE LABELED AT THE BOTTOM. SEE S0.0 FOR TYPICAL MULTIPLE-PLY COLUMN DETAILS. 4.ROOF BEAMS (EXLUDING HEADERS) SHALL BE FLUSH FRAMED UNLESS NOTED AS (DROPPED). 5.ALL HEADERS AT THIS LEVEL SHALL BE (2) 2x6 U.N.O. TYPICAL PORTAL FRAME - CS-PF OVER WOOD FLR FRAMING OVER CONC FDTN NOTE: CONT WALL SHTHG PER SGN, OMITTED FOR CLARITY 8d NAILS IN 3" GRID, TYP HDR PER PLAN, CONT OVER WALL PANEL SIMPSON LSTA18 I.F. WALL EA END OF OPNG UNO (1) TRIMMER, (1) KING STUD, SHTHG NAILING PER SGN (1) TRIMMER, (1) KING STUD UNO BOT PL ABs PER SGN 4x FLAT BLKG @ PANEL EDGE. LOC EDGE @ WALL MID-HT. (2) TRIMMER STUDS UNO CONC FDTN AB PER SGN 8d NAILS @ 3" OC ALL WALL PANEL FRAMING AS SHOWN2'-0" MAX10'-0" MAX TO T.O. HEADERWALL OPNG 2'-0" MIN 18'-0" MAX IMTERMED STUDS PER WOOD SGN WALL PANEL PER PLAN WALL CONT DBL TOP PL SIMPSON LSTA18 O.F. WALL EA END OF WALL PANEL P2 NAILS @ 4" OC BOT PL TO RIM/JST FLR SHTHG SOLE PL NAILING PER OTHER DETs RIM/JST EXTEND WALL SHTHG DOWN TO T.O. RIM/JST 16" MIN 16" MIN 1"Ø TIE ROD (A36) 2 PLACES 4'-0"4'-0" ROOF TRUSS ELEVATION SCALE: 1/4" = 1'-0" (4) 11 7/8" LVL TOP CHORD. ATTACH TO (E) 2x6 w/ 2 ROWS P2 NAILS @ 8 " OC. TYP.4'-0"(E) ROOF SHTHG TO REMAIN SUPPORTING WALL, TYP 8 S2.1 9 S2.1 10 S2.1 12 S2.1 13 S2.1 T Y P 5'-3" TYP TYP 14 S2.1 15 S2.1TYP 16 S2.1 17 S2.1 TURNBUCKLE APPROX 1/3 LENGTH OF ROD FROM BOT, 2 PLACES 5'-2" TYP MIRROR DIMENSIONS ABOUT RIDGE LINE INTERSECTION @ B.O. LVL CHORDS A A B B C C D D E E 4 4 3 3 2 2 1 1 (E) RIDGE BOARD(E) RIDGE BOARD11 7/8" LVLs SISTERED TO (E) RAFTERS. LAMINATE PER TYP MULTI-PLY BEAMS DET S0.0. TYP. DEMO (E) EXT WALL SLOPESLOPESLOPESLOPEREMOVE (E) CMU CHIMNEY & REPLACE w/ FRAMED CHIMNEY PER DET11 7/8"LSL11 7/8"LSL11 7/8" LVL11 7/8" LVLDECK BELOW (3) 9 1/4" LVL(3) 9 1/4" LVLBWP BWP BWPTYP PORTAL FRAME PER DETAIL THIS SHEET (2) 11 7/8" LVL (2) 11 7/8" LVL11 7/8"LSL11 7/8"LSL(E) 2x6 @ 16" OC SISTERED LVL EA (E) 2x6 BWPBWPBWPTYP BWP: 1.BWPs SHALL BE SHEATHED AND FASTENED PER WOOD SGN. 2.BLOCK & NAIL ALL SHTHG PANEL EDGES; BLKG MAY BE FLAT.TYP48" SIMPSON CS16 FROM (N) WALL BLKG TO (E) WALL TOP PL IF RAFTER SPACING @ WALL EXCEEDS 18", ADD ADDL LVL RAFTER PAIR LUS210TYPATTACH (E) SHTHG TO (N) FRAMING PER WOOD SGN @ (N) SKYLIGHT OPNGs, TYP DEMO WALL, HDRs NOTE 5 TYP UNO TYPTRUSS TRUSS TRUSS TRUSS TRUSS TRUSS TRUSS TRUSSES PER EL THIS SHEET @ 48" OC MAX, TYPTYPHGRs PER 17/S2.1, TYP 30" SIMPSON CS16 ACROSS END OF TRUSS @ (E) TOP PL, TYP LEDGER PER DET, TYP TRUSS TRUSSES TO BE SPACED 4'-0" OC MAX 1010 W 24th St Rifle, Colorado 81650 (970) 462-8853 bwr@bwr.pe 312 WEST HYMAN AVENUE REMODELASPEN, COLORADOSHEET SHEET TITLE DRAWN BY:BWR PROJECT ENGR:BWR PROJECT #: 22009 DATE ISSUE 3/9/2023 CD REVISION S1.2 ROOF FRAMING PLAN 09MAR2023 Architects note- The roof framing plan was included with the HPC filing to show the details for the removal of the dropped ceiling. The collar ties provide the support for the East and West Walls, taking the lateral loads on the walls. The new ridge beam (sistered to existing) and new rafters (sistered to existing) provide a deeper cavity for insulation. The insulation for the roof and upper walls are shown on A600. There is no change to the existing CMU cavities. The details on the structural sheet (updated at permit submittal) will reflect a sheer wall, plywood North of Grid 1, so that the structural detail will not be visible from the exterior. SHEET TITLE INTEGRATED DESIGN TEAM PROJECT NO: MODEL FILE: DRAWN BY: COPYRIGHT: SHEET 25 Z001 Jeffrey H Woodruff 312_W_Hyman_03312023.pln Project No. 116 /Users/jeffrey/Documents/Cloud Hill/Rainbow/structural/312_W_Hyman_03312023.plnPowder Day Skiiing, LLC, David A Tarrab Mees Floor Area Calculations 312 W Hyman Ave 312 W Hyman Ave Lots P+Q, Block 46 Aspen CO 81611 USA/ Pitkin County UGB, City of Aspen 312 W Hyman Ave Aspen CO 81611 USA Account # R000145 Parcel ID # 273512464006 Landscape Architect Jennifer M. Dolecki-Smith, RLA Escape Garden Design, LLC Civil Grading and Drainage Jay Engstrom, P.E. Crystal River Civil, LLC Structural Engineer Brian Rossiter, P.E. bwr.pe Contractor COA- HPO Site Visit08/22/21 Jeffrey H. Woodruff AIA, LEED AP Cloud Hill Design, LLC Snowmass CO 81654 USA COA- HPC Conceptual02/26/22 COA- HPC Conceptual04/27/22 COA- HPC Final07/27/22 COA- City Council Call Up10/12/22 COA- HPC Final04/12/23 824 sq ft 41 sq ft 16 sq ft 269 sq ft A A B B C C D D E E 4 4 3 3 2 2 1 1 10' R E A R S E T B A C K - P R I N C I P A L B U I L D I N G 5' R E A R S E T B A C K - P R I N C I P A L B U I L D I N G U S E D A S G A R A G E & A C C E S S O R Y B U I L D I N G 5' MINIMUM SIDE SETBACK5' MINIMUM SIDE SETBACK10' F R O N T S E T B A C K PRI N C I P A L B U I L D I N G 15' F R O N T S E T B A C K ACC E S S O R Y B U I L D I N G 10' R E A R S E T B A C K - P R I N C I P A L B U I L D I N G 5' R E A R S E T B A C K - P R I N C I P A L B U I L D I N G U S E D A S G A R A G E & A C C E S S O R Y B U I L D I N G 880 sq ft A A B B C C D D E E 4 4 3 3 2 2 1 1 301 sq ft 60 sq ft Floor Area Calculations City of Aspen 312 W Hyman Zoning Submission Existing Main Level Floor Area Calculations Main Level Gross Floor Area (Sq Ft)824 Garage is 269 Sq Ft, attached Main Level Countable Floor Area (Sq Ft)1,091 Existing Deck/Porch Floor Area Calculations 301 Exempt per 26.575.020.D5, Structural Stairs 60 Sq Ft Front Porch Gross Floor Area (Sq Ft)301 Exempt per 15% of allowable, 15% of 3,240 = 486 Deck/Porch Countable Floor Area (Sq Ft)0 Total Existing Floor Area Calculations Sub-grade Floor Area (Sq Ft)0 Lower Level Floor Area (Sq Ft)880 Main Level Floor Area (Sq Ft)789 Subtracted Stairs at upper level Deck/Porch Floor Area (Sq Ft)0 Total Existing Floor Area (Sq Ft 1,669 1 N SCALE: 1/8" = 1'-0" 1 Existing Main Level Floor Area Z001 SCALE: 1/8" = 1'-0" 2 Existing Second Level Floor Area Z001 SCALE: 1' = 1'-0" 3 Floor Area Calculations Spring 2023 Z001 SHEET TITLE INTEGRATED DESIGN TEAM PROJECT NO: MODEL FILE: DRAWN BY: COPYRIGHT: SHEET 26 Z002 Jeffrey H Woodruff 312_W_Hyman_03312023.pln Project No. 116 /Users/jeffrey/Documents/Cloud Hill/Rainbow/structural/312_W_Hyman_03312023.plnPowder Day Skiiing, LLC, David A Tarrab Mees Floor Area Calculations 312 W Hyman Ave 312 W Hyman Ave Lots P+Q, Block 46 Aspen CO 81611 USA/ Pitkin County UGB, City of Aspen 312 W Hyman Ave Aspen CO 81611 USA Account # R000145 Parcel ID # 273512464006 Landscape Architect Jennifer M. Dolecki-Smith, RLA Escape Garden Design, LLC Civil Grading and Drainage Jay Engstrom, P.E. Crystal River Civil, LLC Structural Engineer Brian Rossiter, P.E. bwr.pe Contractor COA- HPO Site Visit08/22/21 Jeffrey H. Woodruff AIA, LEED AP Cloud Hill Design, LLC Snowmass CO 81654 USA COA- HPC Conceptual02/26/22 COA- HPC Conceptual04/27/22 COA- HPC Final07/27/22 COA- City Council Call Up10/12/22 COA- HPC Final04/12/23 5,976 sq ft 1,227 sq ft 489 sq ft 393 sq ft 760 sq ft 656 sq ft 272 sq ft 465 sq ft 1,063 sq ft 38 sq ft A A B B C C D D E E 4 4 3 3 2 2 1 1 5'-0 1 / 6 4 " 314 sq ft 29 sq ft Garden Storage (Under Stairs) Stairs Sq Footage Counted on Second Floor Growth commensurate with converting garage to habitable space Wall @ 4'-6" height to add to bedroom/habitable space under stairs, counted at 100% Sq Ft. 5' Set Back 10' R E A R S E T B A C K - P R I N C I P A L B U I L D I N G 5' R E A R S E T B A C K - P R I N C I P A L B U I L D I N G U S E D A S G A R A G E & A C C E S S O R Y B U I L D I N G 5' MINIMUM SIDE SETBACK5' MINIMUM SIDE SETBACK10' F R O N T S E T B A C K PRI N C I P A L B U I L D I N G 15' F R O N T S E T B A C K ACC E S S O R Y B U I L D I N G 972 sq ft 311 sq ft 59 sq ft 32 sq ft A A B B C C D D E E 4 4 3 3 2 2 1 1 Exterior Structural Stairs Counted on 2nd Floor Exterior Deck (Extended to the North) New Exterior Deck (North East) Down Floor Area Calculations City of Aspen 312 W Hyman Zoning Submission Proposed Main Level Floor Area Calculations Main Level Gross Floor Area (Sq Ft)1,227 Garage converted to habitable Main Level Countable Floor Area (Sq Ft)1,227 Table 26.575.020-2,Size of Garage or Carport First 0 to 250 square feet Proposed Deck/Porch Floor Area Calculations Front Porch Gross Floor Area (Sq Ft)311 Exempt per 15% of allowable, 15% of 3,240 = 486, Front deck is 311, rear deck is 32. 333 < 486 Rear Porch Gross Floor Area (Sq Ft)32 Exempt per 15% of allowable, 15% of 3,240 = 486, Front deck is 311, rear deck is 32. 333 < 486 Deck/Porch Countable Floor Area (Sq Ft)0 Exempt per 26.575.020.D5 Structural Steps Floor Area (Sq Ft)59 Exempt per 26.575.020.D5, as per Assessor, exterior steps Deck/Porch Countable Floor Area (Sq Ft)0 Exempt per 15% of allowable 3240 *.15 = 486, 311 < 486 Total Existing Floor Area Calculations Sub-grade Floor Area (Sq Ft)0 Lower Level Floor Area (Sq Ft)1,211 Garage converted to habitable, extend habitable to the N and E Main Level Floor Area (Sq Ft)959 Extend floor plate to the North and East Total Proposed Floor Area (Sq Ft)2,170 Allowed is 3,240 SF Garage above 250, Square footage as per Next 251 to 500 square feet, 64 SF counts @ 50% so 32 SF to Floor Area. See City of Aspen Bonus Square Footage of 434 SF as per seller contract dated 1/14/2019 0 Garage is 314 SF, But as per HPC and City of Aspen contract with current owner 434 SF is a bonus square footage. So zero of the garage counts toward SF 2,170 Max floor area = 3,240 1,070 Remaining floor area = 3,240 - 2,170 = 1,070 Trash container is exempt Storage under the stairs is exempt Exterior stairs are exempt as per LUC 1 N SCALE: 1/8" = 1'-0" 1 Proposed Main Level Floor Area Z002 SCALE: 1/8" = 1'-0" 2 Second Floor- Floor Area Z002 SCALE: 1' = 1'-0" 3 Floor Area Calculations Spring 2023 Z002 lower level 1211 Upper level 959 New Total 2,170 New Deck 45 sf SHEET TITLE INTEGRATED DESIGN TEAM PROJECT NO: MODEL FILE: DRAWN BY: COPYRIGHT: SHEET 27 Z003 Jeffrey H Woodruff 312_W_Hyman_03312023.pln Project No. 116 /Users/jeffrey/Documents/Cloud Hill/Rainbow/structural/312_W_Hyman_03312023.plnPowder Day Skiiing, LLC, David A Tarrab Mees Height Measurements 312 W Hyman Ave 312 W Hyman Ave Lots P+Q, Block 46 Aspen CO 81611 USA/ Pitkin County UGB, City of Aspen 312 W Hyman Ave Aspen CO 81611 USA Account # R000145 Parcel ID # 273512464006 Landscape Architect Jennifer M. Dolecki-Smith, RLA Escape Garden Design, LLC Civil Grading and Drainage Jay Engstrom, P.E. Crystal River Civil, LLC Structural Engineer Brian Rossiter, P.E. bwr.pe Contractor COA- HPO Site Visit08/22/21 Jeffrey H. Woodruff AIA, LEED AP Cloud Hill Design, LLC Snowmass CO 81654 USA COA- HPC Conceptual02/26/22 COA- HPC Conceptual04/27/22 COA- HPC Final07/27/22 COA- City Council Call Up10/12/22 COA- HPC Final04/12/23 ±0" 1 First Floor ±0" 1 First Floor +9'-3" 2 Second Floor +9'-3" 2 Second Floor +18'-3" 3 Roof +18'-3" 3 Roof 19'-3"11'-9"9'-0" 22'-1 5/16" 25'-0" 13'-6 15/32" Existing WoodNew Wood Existing Opening Existing Wood Existing CMU Existing CMU New Stucco New Standing Seam W G1 D G1 W 6E W 16W W 15W W SKY1 W 6W D 6W W 5W D 2S Existing Grade (Most Restrictive) Existing Chimney Cap, Match Height Ridge Detached Garage ±0" 1 First Floor ±0" 1 First Floor +9'-3" 2 Second Floor +9'-3" 2 Second Floor +18'-3" 3 Roof +18'-3" 3 Roof 18'-3 1/ 2 " 19'-7 1/16"19'-7 1/16"25'-0"Existing Grade (Most Restrictive) SCALE: 1/4" = 1'-0" 1 West Elevation Height Z003 SCALE: 1/4" = 1'-0" 2 Existing South Elevation Z003 Zone District Height Limit Per 26.710.040 Medium Density Residential R-6 Maximum Height 25' Zoning Note: Height Measurement (Z002): since the ridge line of the structure is below the height maximum, this works. SHEET TITLE INTEGRATED DESIGN TEAM PROJECT NO: MODEL FILE: DRAWN BY: COPYRIGHT: SHEET 28 Z004 Jeffrey H Woodruff 312_W_Hyman_03312023.pln Project No. 116 /Users/jeffrey/Documents/Cloud Hill/Rainbow/structural/312_W_Hyman_03312023.plnPowder Day Skiiing, LLC, David A Tarrab Mees Wall Demolition Calculations 312 W Hyman Ave 312 W Hyman Ave Lots P+Q, Block 46 Aspen CO 81611 USA/ Pitkin County UGB, City of Aspen 312 W Hyman Ave Aspen CO 81611 USA Account # R000145 Parcel ID # 273512464006 Landscape Architect Jennifer M. Dolecki-Smith, RLA Escape Garden Design, LLC Civil Grading and Drainage Jay Engstrom, P.E. Crystal River Civil, LLC Structural Engineer Brian Rossiter, P.E. bwr.pe Contractor COA- HPO Site Visit08/22/21 Jeffrey H. Woodruff AIA, LEED AP Cloud Hill Design, LLC Snowmass CO 81654 USA COA- HPC Conceptual02/26/22 COA- HPC Conceptual04/27/22 COA- HPC Final07/27/22 COA- City Council Call Up10/12/22 COA- HPC Final04/12/23 467 sq ft39 sq ft 535 sq ft 7 sq ft±0" 1 First Floor ±0" 1 First Floor +9'-3" 2 Second Floor +9'-3" 2 Second Floor +18'-3" 3 Roof +18'-3" 3 Roof 25 sq ft 14 sq ft 14 sq ft 11 sq ft 5 sq ft 76 sq ft The existing wall is 535 Square Feet. The reduction for fenestration is 91 Square Feet The wall area is 444 Square Feet. Demolition on the North Elevation, net of fenestration, is 376 Square Feet. A B 22 sq ft 20 sq ft95 sq ft 84 sq ft389 sq ft 72 sq ft 35 sq ft 32 sq ft 10 sq ft 11 sq ft 95 sq ft456 sq ft 83 sq ft 20 sq ft 20 sq ft±0" 1 First Floor ±0" 1 First Floor +9'-3" 2 Second Floor +9'-3" 2 Second Floor +18'-3" 3 Roof +18'-3" 3 Roof The existing wall is 654 Square Feet. The reduction for fenestration is 90 Square Feet The wall area is 564 Square Feet. Demolition on the East Elevation is 84+20 = 104 Square Feet, net of fenestration. C D EF 404 sq ft 35 sq ft 35 sq ft 10 sq ft 56 sq ft 56 sq ft 598 sq ft ±0" 1 First Floor ±0" 1 First Floor +9'-3" 2 Second Floor +9'-3" 2 Second Floor +18'-3" 3 Roof +18'-3" 3 Roof The existing wall is 598 Square Feet. The reduction for fenestration is 192 Square Feet The wall area is 406 Square Feet. No demolition on the South Facade 536 sq ft 22 sq ft 22 sq ft 10 sq ft 10 sq ft48 sq ft 647 sq ft 19 sq ft 48 sq ft ±0" 1 First Floor +9'-3" 2 Second Floor +18'-3" 3 Roof The existing wall is 647 Square Feet. The reduction for fenestration is 111 Square Feet The wall area is 536 Square Feet. The total demolition on the West Facade is 19 Square Feet.W SKY15'-10 1/2" 1'-10 1/2"Sill 1'-6 17/64"W SKY25'-10 1/2" 1'-10 1/2"Sill 1'-6 17/64"A B C D E 4 4 3 3 2 2 1 1 1' Overhang, typ. Solar as per onsite Energy Requirements 16x 64.7 x 47.4 x 1.6" Radon (roof penetration) to be replaced (interior, update to slab (penetrations), existing roof penetration to be used) for relocated fan/vent Vent (Vent Stack) Vent (Vent Stack) Former Boiler Flu (roof penetration), will be vent stack 6" diameter duct Match existing, new construction concrete fiber cement over steel frame Snow Clips (health and safety), As per City of Aspen R910 and Section 1513 Protected entry, as per Ord. 40-2016 Snow Clips (health and safety), As per City of Aspen R910 and Section 1513 Snow Clips (health and safety), As per City of Aspen R910 and Section 1513 Protected entry, as per Ord. 40-2016 Gutters and downspouts as per Civil Grading and Drainage (Existing) Gutters to be replaced and installed as per mfr. as per Civil Grading and Drainage Gutters as per Civil Grading and Drainage, required by City of Aspen at entry, recommended by COA Historic Guidelines, required by Architect Gutters and downspouts as per Civil Grading and Drainage (Existing) Gutters to be replaced and installed as per mfr. as per Civil Grading and Drainage 1' Garage Overhang, typ. Outline of 2nd floor (below), extent of fascia 4:12 4:12 3: 12Slope 3:12 Slope 3:12 Slope 6:12 3:12 Slope Note: Gutters exist on the East fascia, as per City of Aspen adopted building code, they were not properly installed and jeopardize the historic decorative trim. Install as per mfr. with blocking toenailed to the rafters, as per arch. A dry well holds run-off from the east gable. The Trex deck drains to the dry well to the south. The addition of gutters on the west gable and a new dry well to the North of the structure bring the historic structure into compliance with the city of Aspen adopted building code (protection of occupants at entry and on-site capture and dispersion of water events). Without gutters, laminar flow means rain and snowmelt are degrading the historic fascia and shedding water to the base and foundation, without proper drainage; negating the 24" surrounding no- planting recital. Gutters and snow guards are required as per city of aspen 2016 Ord .40. Note on Snow Clips. Arch prefer snow pipes for snow load at elevation, re: health and safety as per R910 and Section 1513 Re: snow clips from mfr.; no recommendation for layout for a pad-style snow guard on membrane roofing for projects with such a high snow load. However, one option for membrane roofing, the PD90. Install this pad down into the structural deck below the membrane roofing Layout and pattern they would be at archs recommendation- 3 rows 24" OC, with middle row offset by 12" Would prefer greater visual impact and better health safety, but will acquiesce- with: gutters on East and West, A Style Box gutter, downspouts and elbows (to match fascia) and three rows of snow clips, PD90 Demoltion Calculations City of Aspen 312 West Hyman Zoning Submission Wall Demolition Wall Label Individual Wall Area (Sq Ft) Area Reduced or Fenestration (Sq Ft) Area of Wall to be Removed (Sq Ft) A- North Wall 535 69 390 B- North Wall 39 24 15 C- East Wall 95 10 85 D- East Wall 20 0 20 E- East Wall 72 11 61 F- East Wall 456 67 0 G- South Wall 598 194 0 I- West Wall 647 111 67 Roof Demolition (Area of Roof for two Skylights)1295 0 22 Wall Surface Area Total (Sq Ft)3757 Area Reduced for Fenestration (Sq Ft)486 Area Used for Demo Calculation 660 Demolition Totals Roof and Wall Area Used for Demo Calculation (Sq Ft)660 Surface Area to be Removed (Sq Ft) Total 660 1 SCALE: 1/16" = 1'-0" 1 North Walls Wall A and Wall B Z004 SCALE: 1/16" = 1'-0" 2 East Walls Wall C and Wall D and Wall E Z004 SCALE: 1/16" = 1'-0" 3 South Walls G Z004 SCALE: 1/16" = 1'-0" 4 West Wall I Z004SCALE: 1/16" = 1'-0" 5 Roof- Plan Shows Demo of Roof for Skylights as per table Z004 SCALE: 1' = 1'-0" 6 Floor Area Calculations Spring 2023 Z004 Existing Wall to Remain Wall Area to be Removed Area Reduced for Fenestration Exposed Wall Legend SHEET TITLE INTEGRATED DESIGN TEAM PROJECT NO: MODEL FILE: DRAWN BY: COPYRIGHT: SHEET 29 Z005 Jeffrey H Woodruff 312_W_Hyman_03312023.pln Project No. 116 /Users/jeffrey/Documents/Cloud Hill/Rainbow/structural/312_W_Hyman_03312023.plnPowder Day Skiiing, LLC, David A Tarrab Mees Site Coverage 312 W Hyman Ave 312 W Hyman Ave Lots P+Q, Block 46 Aspen CO 81611 USA/ Pitkin County UGB, City of Aspen 312 W Hyman Ave Aspen CO 81611 USA Account # R000145 Parcel ID # 273512464006 Landscape Architect Jennifer M. Dolecki-Smith, RLA Escape Garden Design, LLC Civil Grading and Drainage Jay Engstrom, P.E. Crystal River Civil, LLC Structural Engineer Brian Rossiter, P.E. bwr.pe Contractor COA- HPO Site Visit08/22/21 Jeffrey H. Woodruff AIA, LEED AP Cloud Hill Design, LLC Snowmass CO 81654 USA COA- HPC Conceptual02/26/22 COA- HPC Conceptual04/27/22 COA- HPC Final07/27/22 COA- City Council Call Up10/12/22 COA- HPC Final04/12/23 824 sq ft 41 sq ft 16 sq ft 269 sq ft A A B B C C D D E E 4 4 3 3 2 2 1 1 Wall @ 4'-6" height to add to bedroom/habitable space under stairs, counted at 100% Sq Ft. 10' R E A R S E T B A C K - P R I N C I P A L B U I L D I N G 5' R E A R S E T B A C K - P R I N C I P A L B U I L D I N G U S E D A S G A R A G E & AC C E S S O R Y B U I L D I N G 5' MINIMUM SIDE SETBACK5' MINIMUM SIDE SETBACK10' F R O N T S E T B A C K PRI N C I P A L B U I L D I N G 15' F R O N T S E T B A C K ACC E S S O R Y B U I L D I N G 10' R E A R S E T B A C K - P R I N C I P A L B U I L D I N G 5' R E A R S E T B A C K - P R I N C I P A L B U I L D I N G U S E D A S G A R A G E & AC C E S S O R Y B U I L D I N G Proposed Development Zoning Allowance and Project Summary City of Aspen 312 W Hyman Zoning Submission Proposed Development Single Family | Remodel Addition Parcel #273512464006 Zone District R6 Existing Allowed (Principal)Allowed (Accessory) Proposed (Principal) Proposed Accessory LUC Reference Setbacks 26.710.060 Front 19’-7”25’25’19’-7”n/a 26.710.060 Rear 33’-6”10’5’33’-6”5’26.710.060 Combined Front/Rear 26.710.060 East Side 2’-4”5’5’2’-4”5’26.710.060 West Side 11 2/3’10’10’11 2/3’5’26.710.040 Medium-Density Residential (R-6). Combined Side 15’15’15’7’-4”, No change to West Principal 5’, Garage/ Combined Variance Approved for site at Conceptual Combined Side Set Back Approved by HPC Distance between Buildings N/A N/A 11.07’, between the garage and the principal N/A 11.07’, between the garage and the principal 26.710.060 Corner Lot N/A N/A n/a N/A N/A 26.710.060 Floor Area (Square Feet)1,669 3,240 2,170 Supplemental Breakdown Info Existing Required Proposed LUC Reference Net Leasable/Comm (Sq Ft)Not Req for Residential N/A 26.575.020.I. Open Space %80.79%Not Req for R-6 73.90%26.710.060 Site Coverage 19.21%Not Req for R-6 26.10%26.710.060 On-Site Parking 2 2 2 26.515.030 Site Coverage Existing LUC Reference Gross Lot Area (Sq Ft)6,000 6,000 Z-007, Lot is RS-6 Area of Building Footprint (Sq Ft)1148 1091+41+16 1,560 1211+314+35 26.575.020.G. Site Coverage 19.13%26.00% Land Value Summary Actual Value Land $3,200,000 Improvements $718,000 Total $3,918,000 1 N SCALE: 1/8" = 1'-0" 2 Existing Site Coverage Z005 SCALE: 1' = 1'-0" 3 Floor Area Calculations Spring 2023 Z005 Site is 5976 sq ft as per survey. Site Coverage is not triggered as per LUC. Maximum site coverage: No Limitation Site notes from LUC: Sheds, Storage Areas, and similar Accessory Structures. Sheds, storage areas, greenhouses, and similar uninhabitable accessory structures, not within a garage, are exempt from floor area limitations up to a maximum exemption of thirty-two (32) square feet per residence. Storage areas within a garage shall be treated as garage space eligible for the garage exemption only. Accessory structures thirty-six (36) inches or less in height, as measured from finished grade, shall be exempt from Floor Area calculations (also see setback limitations). Accessory structures that are both larger than thirty-two (32) square feet per primary residence and more than thirty-six (36) inches in height shall be included in their entirety in the calculation of Floor Area. Properties which do not contain residential units are not eligible for this Floor Area exemption. If the property adjoins an alleyway, the trash and recycle service area shall be along and accessed from the alleyway • HPC Granted a 7.4' combined side yard set back at Final 2022 • Requesting 5.4' Combined side yard setback at Susbtantial 2023 (East @ 2.4 + West @ 3). Change requested given new plumb retaining wall @ St Moritz at 2' from the property line (leaving 5' between the 6' retaining wall and the single story garage). HPC is the decision making body for the variance. 5,976 sq ft 1,227 sq ft 489 sq ft 393 sq ft 760 sq ft 656 sq ft 272 sq ft 465 sq ft 1,063 sq ft 38 sq ft A A B B C C D D E E 4 4 3 3 2 2 1 1 5'-0 1 / 6 4 " 314 sq ft 29 sq ft Garden Storage (Under Stairs) Stairs Sq Footage Counted on Second Floor Growth commensurate with converting garage to habitable space Wall @ 4'-6" height to add to bedroom/habitable space under stairs, counted at 100% Sq Ft. 5' Set Back 10' R E A R S E T B A C K - P R I N C I P A L B U I L D I N G 5' R E A R S E T B A C K - P R I N C I P A L B U I L D I N G U S E D A S G A R A G E & AC C E S S O R Y B U I L D I N G 5' MINIMUM SIDE SETBACK5' MINIMUM SIDE SETBACK10' F R O N T S E T B A C K PRI N C I P A L B U I L D I N G 15' F R O N T S E T B A C K ACC E S S O R Y B U I L D I N G SCALE: 1/8" = 1'-0" 1 Proposed Site Coverage Z005 SHEET TITLE INTEGRATED DESIGN TEAM PROJECT NO: MODEL FILE: DRAWN BY: COPYRIGHT: SHEET 30 Z006 Jeffrey H Woodruff 312_W_Hyman_03312023.pln Project No. 116 /Users/jeffrey/Documents/Cloud Hill/Rainbow/structural/312_W_Hyman_03312023.plnPowder Day Skiiing, LLC, David A Tarrab Mees Zoning Summary 312 W Hyman Ave 312 W Hyman Ave Lots P+Q, Block 46 Aspen CO 81611 USA/ Pitkin County UGB, City of Aspen 312 W Hyman Ave Aspen CO 81611 USA Account # R000145 Parcel ID # 273512464006 Landscape Architect Jennifer M. Dolecki-Smith, RLA Escape Garden Design, LLC Civil Grading and Drainage Jay Engstrom, P.E. Crystal River Civil, LLC Structural Engineer Brian Rossiter, P.E. bwr.pe Contractor COA- HPO Site Visit08/22/21 Jeffrey H. Woodruff AIA, LEED AP Cloud Hill Design, LLC Snowmass CO 81654 USA COA- HPC Conceptual02/26/22 COA- HPC Conceptual04/27/22 COA- HPC Final07/27/22 COA- City Council Call Up10/12/22 COA- HPC Final04/12/23 Proposed Development Zoning Allowance and Project Summary City of Aspen 312 W Hyman Zoning Submission Proposed Development Single Family | Remodel Addition Parcel #273512464006 Zone District R6 Existing Allowed (Principal)Allowed (Accessory) Proposed (Principal) Proposed Accessory LUC Reference Setbacks 26.710.060 Front 19’-7”25’25’19’-7”n/a 26.710.060 Rear 33’-6”10’5’33’-6”5’26.710.060 Combined Front/Rear 26.710.060 East Side 2’-4”5’5’2’-4”5’26.710.060 West Side 11 2/3’10’10’11 2/3’5’26.710.040 Medium-Density Residential (R-6). Combined Side 15’15’15’7’-4”, No change to West Principal 5’, Garage/ Combined Variance Approved for site at Conceptual Combined Side Set Back Approved by HPC Distance between Buildings N/A N/A 11.07’, between the garage and the principal N/A 11.07’, between the garage and the principal 26.710.060 Corner Lot N/A N/A n/a N/A N/A 26.710.060 Floor Area (Square Feet)1,669 3,240 2,170 Supplemental Breakdown Info Existing Required Proposed LUC Reference Net Leasable/Comm (Sq Ft)Not Req for Residential N/A 26.575.020.I. Open Space %80.79%Not Req for R-6 73.90%26.710.060 Site Coverage 19.21%Not Req for R-6 26.10%26.710.060 On-Site Parking 2 2 2 26.515.030 Site Coverage Existing LUC Reference Gross Lot Area (Sq Ft)6,000 6,000 Z-007, Lot is RS-6 Area of Building Footprint (Sq Ft)1148 1091+41+16 1,560 1211+314+35 26.575.020.G. Site Coverage 19.13%26.00% Land Value Summary Actual Value Land $3,200,000 Improvements $718,000 Total $3,918,000 1 SCALE: 1:0.50 1 Floor Area Calculations Spring 2023 Z006 • HPC Granted a 7.4' combined side yard set back at Final 2022 • Requesting 5.4' Combined side yard setback at Susbtantial 2023 (East @ 2.4 + West @ 3). Change requested given new plumb retaining wall @ St Moritz at 2' from the property line (leaving 5' between the 6' retaining wall and the single story garage). HPC is the decision making body for the variance. SHEET TITLE INTEGRATED DESIGN TEAM PROJECT NO: MODEL FILE: DRAWN BY: COPYRIGHT: SHEET 31 Z008 Jeffrey H Woodruff 312_W_Hyman_03312023.pln Project No. 116 /Users/jeffrey/Documents/Cloud Hill/Rainbow/structural/312_W_Hyman_03312023.plnPowder Day Skiiing, LLC, David A Tarrab Mees Forestry Site Coverage 312 W Hyman Ave 312 W Hyman Ave Lots P+Q, Block 46 Aspen CO 81611 USA/ Pitkin County UGB, City of Aspen 312 W Hyman Ave Aspen CO 81611 USA Account # R000145 Parcel ID # 273512464006 Landscape Architect Jennifer M. Dolecki-Smith, RLA Escape Garden Design, LLC Civil Grading and Drainage Jay Engstrom, P.E. Crystal River Civil, LLC Structural Engineer Brian Rossiter, P.E. bwr.pe Contractor COA- HPO Site Visit08/22/21 Jeffrey H. Woodruff AIA, LEED AP Cloud Hill Design, LLC Snowmass CO 81654 USA COA- HPC Conceptual02/26/22 COA- HPC Conceptual04/27/22 COA- HPC Final07/27/22 COA- City Council Call Up10/12/22 COA- HPC Final04/12/23 5,976 sq ft 488.75 sq ft 392.75 sq ft 760.25 sq ft 656.25 sq ft 271.75 sq ft 464.75 sq ft 1,063.25 sq ft 38 sq ft 1 2 3 4 5 678 9 10 1112131415 16 10' F R O N T S E T B A C K PRI N C I P A L B U I L D I N G5' MINIMUM SIDE SETBACKSCALE: 1/8" = 1'-0" 1 First Floor- Tree Z008 Site Total RS-6 6000 SF Tree Protection Zone/Pervious Space North/East Trees 680.25 SF South State Tree 760.25 SF Tree Site Coverage 1,440.50 SF Tree Site % 24.01% Impervious Site Coverage Chalet 1210.75 SF Garage 307.5 SF Enclosure 32.25 SF Build out site 1550.50 Build out site % 25.84% Pervious Open Space North 1064.50 SF South East 488.75 SF South West 392.75 SF West Tree 464.75 SF * East Tree 271.75 SF * Open Space 2682.50 Open Space% 44.71% Pavers/skirt ~5.44 % * East and West Deciduous trees counted toward open space North West Garage/Trash Enclosure Strengths: º Aligned with existing site disturbance, the railroad tie retaining wall º Leaves the largest open space in the backyard º No/little impact to trees #3, #4 and #5 and no impact to Aspens along East property line º Does not interfere with existing utilities (maybe gas, but not electric) º Benefits to house across alley (north), views to Shadow Mountain º Minor negative to St Moritz, but ridge line is 12'-6" and grade steps down 3' grade (from the property line to the NE corner of the garage) and 6' retaining wall, so impact is negligible to St Moritz º Distance between the Garage and the Residence is 11', goes to 12' with the 2.5' side setback º Keep all trees, gravel between the alley and the garage º Distance between the property line and Tree #1 is 15'-7", if the neighboring retaining wall is plum and does not encroach on the West property line. Weaknesses: º Minimal impacts to Trees #1 and #2, development, both permeable and hardscape in the Tree #1 drip-line 13' from retaining wall to tree #1 (layout assumes less than 5' setback or additional/variance to combined side setback in R6. If the retaining wall was plum this measurement would be 15' º Impact to existing utilities, gas, which runs to the West and South of tree #1 º Difficult entry, entry from the East due to grade changes at the alley º Drainage SHEET TITLE INTEGRATED DESIGN TEAM PROJECT NO: MODEL FILE: DRAWN BY: COPYRIGHT: SHEET 32 H1 Jeffrey H Woodruff 312_W_Hyman_03312023.pln Project No. 116 /Users/jeffrey/Documents/Cloud Hill/Rainbow/structural/312_W_Hyman_03312023.plnPowder Day Skiiing, LLC, David A Tarrab Mees Historic, Approved, Substantial 312 W Hyman Ave 312 W Hyman Ave Lots P+Q, Block 46 Aspen CO 81611 USA/ Pitkin County UGB, City of Aspen 312 W Hyman Ave Aspen CO 81611 USA Account # R000145 Parcel ID # 273512464006 Landscape Architect Jennifer M. Dolecki-Smith, RLA Escape Garden Design, LLC Civil Grading and Drainage Jay Engstrom, P.E. Crystal River Civil, LLC Structural Engineer Brian Rossiter, P.E. bwr.pe Contractor COA- HPO Site Visit08/22/21 Jeffrey H. Woodruff AIA, LEED AP Cloud Hill Design, LLC Snowmass CO 81654 USA COA- HPC Conceptual02/26/22 COA- HPC Conceptual04/27/22 COA- HPC Final07/27/22 COA- City Council Call Up10/12/22 COA- HPC Final04/12/23 38 sq ft W 6E4'-0" 2'-6"Sill 3'-8"W 5E3'-8" 3'-10"Sill 4'-0"W 2E2'-8" 3'-10"Sill 5'-7 5/64"D 1E8'-0" 3'-0" W 4S2'-8"3'-10"Sill 4'-5" Nook2'-8"2'-1"Sill 4'-5" D 3S6'-5"7'-9"D 2S6'-5"7'-9"D 4S 6'-5"7'-9"D 5S 6'-5"7'-9"W 6W2'-8" 3'-10"Sill 5'-0"W 5W2'-8" 3'-10"Sill 5'-0"D 6W7'-6" 3'-6"W 6E4'-0" 2'-0"Sill 3'-6"D 3E2'-9" 3'-0"D1 L16'-8" 3'-0" D M1 8'-0"3'-0"D B6 8'-0"2'-0"D B48'-0" 2'-6"D B28'-0" 2'-6"D B38'-0" 2'-6"D B58'-0" 2'-6" D B78'-0"4'-0"D B18'-0" 2'-6" D 2N 8'-0"2'-4"D 2N 8'-0"2'-4"D G1 D M18'-0" 2'-8"D M 28'-0" 2'-8" D 2N 7'-6"6'-0"D 1N 7'-6"6'-0"A A B B C C D D E E 4 4 3 3 2 2 1 1 F/R3 A405 32'-7"23'-9"16'-3"1'-6 2 1 / 3 2 " 2'-4 7 / 8 " 11'-8 5 / 3 2 " 8'-2"10'-2"10'-0"4'-3"9'-0"11'-9"19'-3"32'-7"2'-0"5'-6 1/4"3'-0" 100' = 7901.31' 100' 100' = 7901.31' 3 Z004 1 A301 2 A301 2 A211 2 A402 6 A401 4 A403 2 A404 1 A408 1 A407 Existing dry wellW-3W-3W-3W-3W-3 UP bedroom #2 bathe #3 mechanical(14 sq ft)bathe #2 closet bedroom #3 main entry electric meters (2) gas & radon (to be re/ moved) egress egress egress entry w/d louvered door 1/2 bathe cabinet 312 West Hyman "Bedroom" F.F.E. = 7901.31 F.F.E. = 7901.36' F.F.E. = 7901.36' F.F.E. = 7901.33' niche mirror benchmud hooks bench hall closetopen shelvescounterfireplace appliance old 100, cubbies mech. #1, 38 sq. ft./ #2, hw, ws 42" w x 51" h x 17" deep cshp/12" AFF rack mounted, with architectural louvers 1 A300 3 H3 3 H4 1 Z003 2 A300 1 A400 W 11E4'-8" 7'-0"Sill 1'-7 47/64"W 15W3'-6" 6'-0"Sill 3'-0"W 16W3'-6" 6'-0"Sill 3'-0"W 12S5'-0"7'-0"Sill 1'-4" W 14S5'-0"7'-0"Sill 1'-4" D 22E 6'-6"3'-0"D PB28'-0" 3'-0" D PB4 8'-0"2'-6"W 7N 4'-0"1'-2"Sill 3'-0" W 8N 4'-0"3'-0"Sill 3'-0" W 9N 4'-0"3'-0"Sill 3'-0" D PB1 8'-0"2'-10"D PB38'-0"2'-6"D PB58'-0"2'-0"D P18'-0" 2'-0"W 4E4'-0" 2'-6"Sill 3'-0"W 3E4'-0" 2'-6"Sill 3'-0"D 1E7'-0" 6'-0" A A B B C C D D E E 4 4 3 3 2 2 1 1 F DWRE3 Z004 1 A301 2 A301 2 A211 8'-2"10'-2"10'-0"4'-3"9'-0"11'-9"19'-3"32'-7"40'-0"1'-6"3'-6"1'-6"4'-0"9'-4"11'-6"9'-3" 9'-3" 1 A300 3 H3 3 H4 1 Z003 2 A300 1 A410 1 A411 1 A412 2 A413 3 A414 W-1 W-1W-1 W-1W-1kitchen bathe #1 living room down deck fireplace bedroom 1 closetdown egress pantry open to entry below slat art wall 180" = 15' 112" = 9' - 4" 41 sq ftD-114a7'-0" 3'-0" D-117a7'-0"3'-0"W-gg 4'-6"3'-0"Sill 4'-8 3/4"W-gg2'-8" 3'-10"Sill 5'-5"W-gg2'-8" 3'-10"Sill 5'-0"W-gg2'-8" 3'-10"Sill 5'-0"D-119a7'-6" 5'-10" W-gg2'-8"3'-10"Sill 4'-5 7/32" W-gg2'-8"2'-1"Sill 4'-5 7/32" D-120a 6'-5"8'-3"D-120a 6'-5"8'-3"D-116a7'-0"2'-9"W-gg2'-8" 3'-10"Sill 5'-5"D-116a8'-0" 3'-0" D-116a 7'-0"2'-9"A A B B C C D D E E 4 4 3 3 2 2 1 1 W/D W/D 6'-10" 2 Z003 1 Z004 2 Z004 1 H6 KITCHEN BATHROOM BEDROOM LIVING ROOM F.P. STORAGE BEDROOM CLOSET STORAGE GARAGE MECHANICAL STORAGE GARAGE UP up W-gg 3'-0"3'-9"Sill 3'-4 47/64" W-gg 4'-6"3'-0"Sill 2'-10 57/64"W-gg3'-2" 3'-9"Sill 3'-1 47/64"W-gg4'-8" 7'-0"Sill 1'-7 47/64"W-gg2'-6"2'-0"Sill -3"W-gg3'-6" 6'-0"Sill 3'-0"W-gg3'-6" 6'-0"Sill 3'-0"W-gg5'-0"7'-0"Sill 1'-3 47/64" W-gg5'-0"7'-0"Sill 1'-5 31/64" D-121a 6'-6"3'-0"W-gg 2'-6"2'-0"Sill -3" A A B B C C D D E E 4 4 3 3 2 2 1 1 2 Z003 1 Z004 2 Z004 1 H6 11'-5 1/16" KITCHEN BATH BEDROOM LIVING ROOM F.P. BEDROOM CLOSET DOWN DOWN SHEET TITLE INTEGRATED DESIGN TEAM PROJECT NO: MODEL FILE: DRAWN BY: COPYRIGHT: SHEET 15 A103 Jeffrey H Woodruff 312_W_Hyman_06102022.pln Project No. 116 /Users/jeffrey/Documents/Cloud Hill/312 06 22/312_W_Hyman_06102022.plnPowder Day Skiiing, LLC, David A Tarrab Mees Main Level Proposed Plan 312 W Hyman Ave 312 W Hyman Ave Lots P+Q, Block 46 Aspen CO 81611 USA/ Pitkin County UGB, City of Aspen 312 W Hyman Ave Aspen CO 81611 USA Account # R000145 Parcel ID # 273512464006 Landscape Architect Jennifer M. Dolecki-Smith, RLA Escape Garden Design, LLC Interior Design Travis Terry Travis Terry Design Contractor (At Final) Structural Engineer (As per contractor) Civil Grading and Drainage Jay Engstrom, P.E. Crystal River Civil, LLC COA- HPO Site Visit08/22/21 Jeffrey H. Woodruff AIA, LEED AP Cloud Hill Design, LLC Snowmass Snowmass CO 81654 USA COA- HPC Conceptual02/26/22 COA- HPC Conceptual04/27/22 W 2E2'-8" 3'-10"Sill 5'-7 5/64"D 1E8'-0" 3'-0" W 4E2'-8"3'-10"Sill 4'-5" W 3E2'-8"2'-1"Sill 4'-5" D 3E6'-5"7'-9"D 2E6'-5"7'-9"D 1N 7'-6"6'-0"W 17 N 4'-0"3'-0"Sill 4' - 3 " D 4N 6'-5"7'-9"D 5N 6'-5"7'-9"W 1N5'-0" 2'-6"Sill 2'-6"W 1 9 N 4'-0"4'-3"Sill 4 ' - 3 " D 25 N 8'-0"3'-0"D 23 N 7'-0"10'-0"D 24 N 6'-3"5'-0"W 6E2'-8" 3'-10"Sill 5'-0"W 5E2'-8" 3'-10"Sill 5'-0"D 6N7'-6" 3'-6"D 10N7'-0" 2'-10"W 6E4'-0" 2'-0"Sill 3'-6"D 1N 7'-6"6'-0"D 3N2'-9" 3'-0"D 4N6'-8" 4'-0" D 4N8'-0"2'-2"D 0N8'-0"2'-4"D 7N 8'-0"2'-0"D 8N8'-0" 2'-6"D 1N8'-0" 2'-2"D 3N8'-0" 2'-6"D 6N8'-0" 2'-4" D 2N8'-0"2'-6"D 9N8'-0" 2'-6" A B C D E 4 4 3 3 2 2 1 1 F/R16'-4 5 / 8 "20'-4"8'-2 1 7 / 6 4 "43'-0"32'-7"23'-9"16'-3"1'-6 2 1 / 3 2 " 2'-4 7 / 8 "5'-0 1/8"11'-8 5 / 3 2 " 8'-2"10'-2"10'-0"4'-3"9'-0"11'-9"19'-3"32'-7"3'-0"2'-6"2'-0"100' = 7901.31' 100' 100' = 7901.31' 4 Z004 1 A301 2 A301 2 A210 1 A211 3 A211 4 A211 trees protected #3, #4, and # 5 to NE Plaster covered CMU wall with two layers of 5/8" Type X Gypsum, 1 hour fire wall, Cementitious soffit Proposed fence at the 5' side setback and 5' rear setback, lined on the South with shrubs, see landscaping plan St Moritz R e t a i n i n g w a l l ( e x i s t i n g and under r e h a b i l i t a t i o n ) Removal of T r e e # 2 Removal of T r e e # 1 UP bedroom #2 bathe #3 mechanical boot c u b b i e s trash & r e c y c l i n g e n c l o s u r e bathe #2 closet boot c u b b i e s & be n c h bedroom #3 main entry heat pumps (2) electric meters (2) gas & radon egress egress egress entry/mud w/d garden storage 1/2 bathe 1 A300 1 A200 2 A200 2 Z003 2 A300 N SCALE: 1/4" = 1'-0" 1 First Floor A103 SHEET TITLE INTEGRATED DESIGN TEAM PROJECT NO: MODEL FILE: DRAWN BY: COPYRIGHT: SHEET 16 A104 Jeffrey H Woodruff 312_W_Hyman_06102022.pln Project No. 116 /Users/jeffrey/Documents/Cloud Hill/312 06 22/312_W_Hyman_06102022.plnPowder Day Skiiing, LLC, David A Tarrab Mees Second Level Proposed Plan 312 W Hyman Ave 312 W Hyman Ave Lots P+Q, Block 46 Aspen CO 81611 USA/ Pitkin County UGB, City of Aspen 312 W Hyman Ave Aspen CO 81611 USA Account # R000145 Parcel ID # 273512464006 Landscape Architect Jennifer M. Dolecki-Smith, RLA Escape Garden Design, LLC Interior Design Travis Terry Travis Terry Design Contractor (At Final) Structural Engineer (As per contractor) Civil Grading and Drainage Jay Engstrom, P.E. Crystal River Civil, LLC COA- HPO Site Visit08/22/21 Jeffrey H. Woodruff AIA, LEED AP Cloud Hill Design, LLC Snowmass Snowmass CO 81654 USA COA- HPC Conceptual02/26/22 COA- HPC Conceptual04/27/22 W 11E4'-0" 7'-0"Sill 2'-4"W 13N3'-0"2'-0"Sill -1'-0 1/8"W 15E3'-6" 6'-0"Sill 3'-0"W 16E3'-6" 6'-0"Sill 3'-0"W 12E5'-0"7'-0"Sill 1'-4" W 14E5'-0"7'-0"Sill 1'-4" D 22E 6'-6"3'-0"W 0N4'-0" 3'-0"Sill 3'-0"W 0N4'-0" 3'-0"Sill 3'-0"D 1N7'-0" 5'-0" W 7E 4'-0"2'-0"Sill 3'-0"D 19N6'-8" 3'-0" D 20N 8'-0"2'-6"W 7N 4'-0"1'-2"Sill 3'-0" W 7N 4'-6"2'-0"Sill 2'-6" W 9N 4'-6"2'-0"Sill 2'-6" D 18N 8'-0"2'-10"W 7N2'-0" 2'-0"Sill 5'-0"D 18N8'-0"2'-0"D 18N8'-0"2'-0"A A B B C C D D E E 4 4 3 3 2 2 1 1 FDWRE R4 Z004 1 A301 2 A301 2 A210 8'-2"10'-2"10'-0"4'-3"9'-0"11'-9"19'-3"32'-7"40'-0"11'-2 31/32" 9'-3" 9'-3" 1 A300 1 A200 2 A200 2 Z003 2 A300 kitchen bathe #1 living room down deck deck fireplace bedroom 1 closetegress down N SCALE: 1/4" = 1'-0" 1 Second Floor A104 SCALE: 1/8" = 1'-0" 1 Amendment H1 SCALE: 1/8" = 1'-0" 2 Amendment H1 SCALE: 1/8" = 1'-0" 3 First Floor Existing H1 SCALE: 1/8" = 1'-0" 4 Second Floor Existing H1 5 HPC approval granted on July 27, 2022 H1 6 HPC approval granted on July 27, 2022 H1 Deck (North-East), Moved stairs to the North, aligned with current East entry (to provide habitable space to S. East Bedroom main floor). North addition (two story), enclosed Eastern addition to Gridline D. Grid 4:Southern garage converted to habitable space with sliders, behind existing garage doors. North East patio over enclosed space. Preserves chalet rafter exposure to the East. 27 March 2023 SHEET TITLE INTEGRATED DESIGN TEAM PROJECT NO: MODEL FILE: DRAWN BY: COPYRIGHT: SHEET 33 H2 Jeffrey H Woodruff 312_W_Hyman_03312023.pln Project No. 116 /Users/jeffrey/Documents/Cloud Hill/Rainbow/structural/312_W_Hyman_03312023.plnPowder Day Skiiing, LLC, David A Tarrab Mees Historic, Approved, Substantial 312 W Hyman Ave 312 W Hyman Ave Lots P+Q, Block 46 Aspen CO 81611 USA/ Pitkin County UGB, City of Aspen 312 W Hyman Ave Aspen CO 81611 USA Account # R000145 Parcel ID # 273512464006 Landscape Architect Jennifer M. Dolecki-Smith, RLA Escape Garden Design, LLC Civil Grading and Drainage Jay Engstrom, P.E. Crystal River Civil, LLC Structural Engineer Brian Rossiter, P.E. bwr.pe Contractor COA- HPO Site Visit08/22/21 Jeffrey H. Woodruff AIA, LEED AP Cloud Hill Design, LLC Snowmass CO 81654 USA COA- HPC Conceptual02/26/22 COA- HPC Conceptual04/27/22 COA- HPC Final07/27/22 COA- City Council Call Up10/12/22 COA- HPC Final04/12/23W SKY15'-10 1/2" 1'-10 1/2"Sill 1'-6 17/64"W SKY25'-10 1/2" 1'-10 1/2"Sill 1'-6 17/64"A A B B C C D D E E 4 4 3 3 2 2 1 1 1' Overhang, typ. Solar as per onsite Energy Requirements 16x 64.7 x 47.4 x 1.6" Radon (roof penetration) to be replaced (interior, update to slab (penetrations), existing roof penetration to be used) for relocated fan/vent Vent (Vent Stack) Vent (Vent Stack) Former Boiler Flu (roof penetration), will be vent stack 6" diameter duct Match existing, new construction concrete fiber cement over steel frame Snow Clips (health and safety), As per City of Aspen R910 and Section 1513 Protected entry, as per Ord. 40-2016 Snow Clips (health and safety), As per City of Aspen R910 and Section 1513 Snow Clips (health and safety), As per City of Aspen R910 and Section 1513 Protected entry, as per Ord. 40-2016 Gutters and downspouts as per Civil Grading and Drainage (Existing) Gutters to be replaced and installed as per mfr. as per Civil Grading and Drainage Gutters as per Civil Grading and Drainage, required by City of Aspen at entry, recommended by COA Historic Guidelines, required by Architect Gutters and downspouts as per Civil Grading and Drainage (Existing) Gutters to be replaced and installed as per mfr. as per Civil Grading and Drainage 1' Garage Overhang, typ. Outline of 2nd floor (below), extent of fascia 4:12 4:12 3: 12Slope 3:12 Slope 3:12 Slope 6:12 3:12 Slope A A B B C C D D E E 4 4 3 3 2 2 1 1 2 Z003 1 Z004 2 Z004 1 H6 Vent Radon (roof penetration) Vent Former Boiler Flu (roof penetration) Existing chimney, stucco over concrete blook Existing gutters, downspouts and downspout straps No gutters exist today; I-Codes, engineering and City of Aspen issue (health and safety) 3:12 3:12 3:12 3:12 SHEET TITLE INTEGRATED DESIGN TEAM PROJECT NO: MODEL FILE: DRAWN BY: COPYRIGHT: SHEET 17 A105 Jeffrey H Woodruff 312_W_Hyman_06102022.pln Project No. 116 /Users/jeffrey/Documents/Cloud Hill/312 06 22/312_W_Hyman_06102022.plnPowder Day Skiiing, LLC, David A Tarrab Mees Roof Plan Proposed 312 W Hyman Ave 312 W Hyman Ave Lots P+Q, Block 46 Aspen CO 81611 USA/ Pitkin County UGB, City of Aspen 312 W Hyman Ave Aspen CO 81611 USA Account # R000145 Parcel ID # 273512464006 Landscape Architect Jennifer M. Dolecki-Smith, RLA Escape Garden Design, LLC Interior Design Travis Terry Travis Terry Design Contractor (At Final) Structural Engineer (As per contractor) Civil Grading and Drainage Jay Engstrom, P.E. Crystal River Civil, LLC COA- HPO Site Visit08/22/21 Jeffrey H. Woodruff AIA, LEED AP Cloud Hill Design, LLC Snowmass Snowmass CO 81654 USA COA- HPC Conceptual02/26/22 COA- HPC Conceptual04/27/22W 100N6'-0" 3'-6"Sill 1'-3 39/64"W 100N6'-0" 3'-6"Sill 1'-5 13/32"A B C D E 4 4 3 3 2 2 1 1 1' Overhang, typ. Protected entry Solar as per onsite Energy Requirements 4:12 4:12 3.5:12 3.5:12 3.5:12 3.5:12 N SCALE: 1/4" = 1'-0" 1 Roof Plan A105 Note: Today this is a cold roof with attic vents. The current attic vents and screens are in disrepair (upon viewing from the attic) We are proposing removing the dropped ceiling, removing the attic vents and exposing the rafters, adding insulation and updating the light and vent in a Chalet style. The only exterior change, will be converting the attic vents to the same size rough opening, but installing hopper fenestration for light and vent. U-Value for horizontal fenestration = .50 as per IECC 2021 SCALE: 1/8" = 1'-0" 1 Amendment H2SCALE: 1/8" = 1'-0" 2 Roof Existing H2 3 HPC approval granted on July 27, 2022 H2 • Detached garage of alley. • Removed drop ceiling, attic vents. Replaced one vent with a hopper, to protect the Juliet balcony. • Added skylights and shades, as an architectural response to no additional fenestration (triangles at eaves requested at conceptual) • Chimney as original location, but rebuilt as per assembly- matches existing look and location (but removes water damaged rebuilt chimney) • Gutters and downspouts as per civil grading and drainage, in accordance with mfr. and City of Aspen Ord. 40 Series 2016 • Snow guards (pipes) as per City of Aspen Ord. 40 Series 2016, mfr. recommends pipes as per snow load • New dry well to meet City of Aspen site drainage requirements, as per City of Aspen engineering • St Moritz installs new plumb 6' high retaining wall, 2' West of the adjoining property line • Granted 7.4' combined side yard setback at final • City of Aspen recital has 24" (up from 12" as per correspondence) no planting, irrigation surround • Skylights and shades back to two (2) • Chimney rebuilt with cricket. • Gutter and downspout A Style box gutter will not hide the decorative fascia, the decorative scroll is not blocked/impeded from view from the gutters. Box gutters are available in (no less than) 3" H and 4" W. • The current East gutter is a 3" H and 5" W K Style Gutter, the gutter does not match the decorative fascia or roof metal trim. • The decorative trim is measure as 10" interior (West), from roof ply to bottom of decorative trim and 7.5" (est) interior (East). Consistency with COA HPDG: Gutters, Downspouts, Snowstops, and Snow Fences Gutters and downspouts are used to divert water away from a structure. Without this drainage system, water may splash off the roof onto exterior walls and run along the foundation of the building. Snowstops and snow fences are used to protect inhabitants and the building from the sudden snow avalanches that rip off architectural details and can cause serious injury. Gutters can be seen in some 19th century photos of historic buildings and are more common on AspenModern structures. Overall, the visual impact of these functional elements should be minimized. • Removed snow pipes. Mfr. recommends snow pipes, not clips for snowfall amt and roof type. New, designed layout for snow clips. As per mfr. 3 rows, 24" OC, middle row 24" OC - 12" staggered with top and bottom row. • Existing structure does not meet health and safety requirements as per City of Aspen Ord. 2016-40. • Prior construction activities do not hold water events on the site. • Laminar flow (movement toward the structure) threatens the foundation and building to the West •Prior construction activities jeopardize the integrity of the historic facia. • Existing roof was installed in 2013, the existing roof is torch applied 3 layer asphalt (installed by GZO) • This 2013 roof replaced the prior tar and gravel roof. The prior roof was installed in 1991, included a Mansville built up roof, spec 4GNG, installed by Alexander Roofing. • No major grading and drainage report was submitted in 2013 or 1991. • New trex decking, trim, decking, fascia and profile and drainage was installed in 2013. Adopted City of Aspen Code: Section R910 Snow shed design. Roofs shall be designed so that they do not shed ice and snow onto adjoining properties or potentially occupied areas such as a walkway, stairway, alley, deck, pedestrian and vehicular exit from buildings or areas where there is potential for personal injury or property damage and areas directly above or in front of gas utility or electric utility meters. Section 1513 Snow shed design. Roofs shall be designed so that they do not shed ice and snow onto adjacent properties and potentially occupied areas such as a walkway, stairway, alley, deck, pedestrian and vehicular exit from buildings or areas where there is potential for personal injury or property damage and areas directly above or in front of gas utility or electric utility meters. 27 March 2023 SHEET TITLE INTEGRATED DESIGN TEAM PROJECT NO: MODEL FILE: DRAWN BY: COPYRIGHT: SHEET 34 H3 Jeffrey H Woodruff 312_W_Hyman_03312023.pln Project No. 116 /Users/jeffrey/Documents/Cloud Hill/Rainbow/structural/312_W_Hyman_03312023.plnPowder Day Skiiing, LLC, David A Tarrab Mees Historic, Approved, Substantial 312 W Hyman Ave 312 W Hyman Ave Lots P+Q, Block 46 Aspen CO 81611 USA/ Pitkin County UGB, City of Aspen 312 W Hyman Ave Aspen CO 81611 USA Account # R000145 Parcel ID # 273512464006 Landscape Architect Jennifer M. Dolecki-Smith, RLA Escape Garden Design, LLC Civil Grading and Drainage Jay Engstrom, P.E. Crystal River Civil, LLC Structural Engineer Brian Rossiter, P.E. bwr.pe Contractor COA- HPO Site Visit08/22/21 Jeffrey H. Woodruff AIA, LEED AP Cloud Hill Design, LLC Snowmass CO 81654 USA COA- HPC Conceptual02/26/22 COA- HPC Conceptual04/27/22 COA- HPC Final07/27/22 COA- City Council Call Up10/12/22 COA- HPC Final04/12/23 ±0" 1 First Floor ±0" 1 First Floor +9'-3" 2 Second Floor +9'-3" 2 Second Floor +18'-3" 3 Roof +18'-3" 3 Roof ±0" 1 First Floor ±0" 1 First Floor +9'-3" 2 Second Floor +9'-3" 2 Second Floor +18'-3" 3 Roof +18'-3" 3 Roof3'-9 63/64"11 45/64"New Wood Existing Wood New CMU Existing Wood Existing Synthetic Treads Rebuilt Stucco W 9N W 8N W 7N D 2N D 1N SHEET TITLE INTEGRATED DESIGN TEAM PROJECT NO: MODEL FILE: DRAWN BY: COPYRIGHT: SHEET 23 A200 Jeffrey H Woodruff 312_W_Hyman_06102022.pln Project No. 116 /Users/jeffrey/Documents/Cloud Hill/312 06 22/312_W_Hyman_06102022.plnPowder Day Skiiing, LLC, David A Tarrab Mees Elevations Proposed 312 W Hyman Ave 312 W Hyman Ave Lots P+Q, Block 46 Aspen CO 81611 USA/ Pitkin County UGB, City of Aspen 312 W Hyman Ave Aspen CO 81611 USA Account # R000145 Parcel ID # 273512464006 Landscape Architect Jennifer M. Dolecki-Smith, RLA Escape Garden Design, LLC Interior Design Travis Terry Travis Terry Design Contractor (At Final) Structural Engineer (As per contractor) Civil Grading and Drainage Jay Engstrom, P.E. Crystal River Civil, LLC COA- HPO Site Visit08/22/21 Jeffrey H. Woodruff AIA, LEED AP Cloud Hill Design, LLC Snowmass Snowmass CO 81654 USA COA- HPC Conceptual02/26/22 COA- HPC Conceptual04/27/22 ±0" 1 First Floor ±0" 1 First Floor +9'-3" 2 Second Floor +9'-3" 2 Second Floor +18'-3" 3 Roof +18'-3" 3 Roof New Wood Existing Wood New CMU Existing Wood Existing Synthetic Treads ±0" 1 First Floor +9'-3" 2 Second Floor +18'-3" 3 Roof Existing Wood Existing CMU New CMU New Wood Balcony Existing Standing Seam New Wood New WoodNew Stucco New Skylights New Masonry New CMU New Storage SCALE: 1/4" = 1'-0" 1 North Elevation A200 SCALE: 1/4" = 1'-0" 2 East Elevation A200 SCALE: 1/4" = 1'-0" 1 Existing North Elevation H3 SCALE: 1/4" = 1'-0" 3 Amendment H3 3 HPC approval granted on July 27, 2022 H3 • North addition to the existing structure, as far North as the existing barge board/decorative fascia. • Enclosed (prior balcony to North East), to add to bedroom square footage • Added gutters and downspouts, not-obstructing existing decorative fascia as per civil grading and drainage, new dry well for city engineering . Gutters and downspouts as per City of Aspen Ord. 40 Series 2016 • Provided heating and cooling as part of electrification of chalet. compressors shown to the North East of the structure. • A small balcony off of the primary bedroom. Balcony railing to match the historic resource (design). • Provided heating and cooling as part of electrification of chalet. compressors move to the East of the structure, will comply with decibel requirements as per City of Aspen, as property line. Enclosure for hyper heat as per cut sheet in specifications. Mounted 12-18" AFF as per mfr. Adjacent to building (and not garage) in order to meet and not exceed max. piping length requirements as per mfr. (65'-75', excessive pipe runs limit output). Sound pressure level as per mfr. cut sheet Cooling 49 db(A), Heating 51 db(A)- so will not exceed 50 db(A) as per municipal code at property line. The heat pumps will be enclosed in an attractive louvered heat pump cover, in order to not detract from the historic resource. • Will remove and replace the existing Radon solution, with a new fan and vent pipe. (Still appears in the North West corner of the structure). 27 March 2023 SHEET TITLE INTEGRATED DESIGN TEAM PROJECT NO: MODEL FILE: DRAWN BY: COPYRIGHT: SHEET 35 H4 Jeffrey H Woodruff 312_W_Hyman_03312023.pln Project No. 116 /Users/jeffrey/Documents/Cloud Hill/Rainbow/structural/312_W_Hyman_03312023.plnPowder Day Skiiing, LLC, David A Tarrab Mees Historic, Approved, Substantial 312 W Hyman Ave 312 W Hyman Ave Lots P+Q, Block 46 Aspen CO 81611 USA/ Pitkin County UGB, City of Aspen 312 W Hyman Ave Aspen CO 81611 USA Account # R000145 Parcel ID # 273512464006 Landscape Architect Jennifer M. Dolecki-Smith, RLA Escape Garden Design, LLC Civil Grading and Drainage Jay Engstrom, P.E. Crystal River Civil, LLC Structural Engineer Brian Rossiter, P.E. bwr.pe Contractor COA- HPO Site Visit08/22/21 Jeffrey H. Woodruff AIA, LEED AP Cloud Hill Design, LLC Snowmass CO 81654 USA COA- HPC Conceptual02/26/22 COA- HPC Conceptual04/27/22 COA- HPC Final07/27/22 COA- City Council Call Up10/12/22 COA- HPC Final04/12/23 ±0" 1 First Floor +9'-3" 2 Second Floor +18'-3" 3 Roof ±0" 1 First Floor +9'-3" 2 Second Floor +18'-3" 3 Roof Existing Wood Existing CMU New CMU New Wood Existing Asphalt New WoodNew Stucco New Skylights New Stucco, Match, typ New CMU Heat Pump, Louvered Cover, 12" AFF W 11E W 3E W SKY2 D 1E W 4E W 2E D 1ED 3E W 6E W G2 D GAR1D GAR2 SHEET TITLE INTEGRATED DESIGN TEAM PROJECT NO: MODEL FILE: DRAWN BY: COPYRIGHT: SHEET 23 A200 Jeffrey H Woodruff 312_W_Hyman_06102022.pln Project No. 116 /Users/jeffrey/Documents/Cloud Hill/312 06 22/312_W_Hyman_06102022.plnPowder Day Skiiing, LLC, David A Tarrab Mees Elevations Proposed 312 W Hyman Ave 312 W Hyman Ave Lots P+Q, Block 46 Aspen CO 81611 USA/ Pitkin County UGB, City of Aspen 312 W Hyman Ave Aspen CO 81611 USA Account # R000145 Parcel ID # 273512464006 Landscape ArchitectJennifer M. Dolecki-Smith, RLAEscape Garden Design, LLCInterior DesignTravis TerryTravis Terry DesignContractor (At Final)Structural Engineer (As per contractor)Civil Grading and DrainageJay Engstrom, P.E.Crystal River Civil, LLC COA- HPO Site Visit08/22/21 Jeffrey H. WoodruffAIA, LEED APCloud Hill Design, LLCSnowmass Snowmass CO81654 USA COA- HPC Conceptual02/26/22 COA- HPC Conceptual04/27/22 ±0" 1 First Floor ±0" 1 First Floor +9'-3" 2 Second Floor +9'-3" 2 Second Floor +18'-3" 3 Roof +18'-3" 3 Roof New Wood Existing Wood New CMU Existing Wood Existing Synthetic Treads ±0" 1 First Floor +9'-3" 2 Second Floor +18'-3" 3 Roof Existing Wood Existing CMU New CMU New Wood Balcony Existing Standing Seam New Wood New WoodNew Stucco New Skylights New Masonry New CMU New Storage SCALE: 1/4" = 1'-0" 1 North Elevation A200 SCALE: 1/4" = 1'-0" 2 East Elevation A200 SCALE: 1/4" = 1'-0" 1 Existing East Elevation H4 SCALE: 1/4" = 1'-0" 3 Amendment H4 3 HPC approval granted on July 27, 2022 H4 • Received final HPC approval for additional skylights and snow pipes. • New fenestration added a the second floor stairs (light and air). • Received final HPC approval to move the stairs to the North (to make the new South bedroom, occupiable- enclosing former storage room off the East elevation. • Enclosed addition to the North and East of the chalet. • Investigated standing steam to replace 2013 roof • Detached garage in the style of the chalet. Standing seam and solar on the detached garage roof • Hot tub outside of the setbacks to the East of the Structure. • Skylights vertical windows, two total • Replaced snow pipes with snow clips as (3 rows) • Existing fenestration will be replaced with double pane IGU’s and dark spacer, meeting current I-codes and quarter round head, sill and jamb conditions will remain unchanged (visibly unchanged, but improved energy performance.) • Chalet addition, new windows • Removed new fenestration on the garage and at the second floor stairs. • Cold sourced heat pumps at East Elevation, meeting db(A) req. and mfr. requirements. 27 March 2023 SHEET TITLE INTEGRATED DESIGN TEAM PROJECT NO: MODEL FILE: DRAWN BY: COPYRIGHT: SHEET 36 H5 Jeffrey H Woodruff 312_W_Hyman_03312023.pln Project No. 116 /Users/jeffrey/Documents/Cloud Hill/Rainbow/structural/312_W_Hyman_03312023.plnPowder Day Skiiing, LLC, David A Tarrab Mees Historic, Approved, Substantial 312 W Hyman Ave 312 W Hyman Ave Lots P+Q, Block 46 Aspen CO 81611 USA/ Pitkin County UGB, City of Aspen 312 W Hyman Ave Aspen CO 81611 USA Account # R000145 Parcel ID # 273512464006 Landscape Architect Jennifer M. Dolecki-Smith, RLA Escape Garden Design, LLC Civil Grading and Drainage Jay Engstrom, P.E. Crystal River Civil, LLC Structural Engineer Brian Rossiter, P.E. bwr.pe Contractor COA- HPO Site Visit08/22/21 Jeffrey H. Woodruff AIA, LEED AP Cloud Hill Design, LLC Snowmass CO 81654 USA COA- HPC Conceptual02/26/22 COA- HPC Conceptual04/27/22 COA- HPC Final07/27/22 COA- City Council Call Up10/12/22 COA- HPC Final04/12/23 ±0" 1 First Floor ±0" 1 First Floor +9'-3" 2 Second Floor +9'-3" 2 Second Floor +18'-3" 3 Roof +18'-3" 3 Roof 18'-3 1 / 2 " 19'-7 1/16"19'-7 1/16"25'-0"Existing Grade (Most Restrictive) ±0" 1 First Floor ±0" 1 First Floor +9'-3" 2 Second Floor +9'-3" 2 Second Floor +18'-3" 3 Roof +18'-3" 3 Roof Existing CMU Existing Wood W 14S D 22E W 12S W S7 W 4S D 4S D 3S D 2S D 5S wood window to replace (outmoded) attic vent, as per window schedule 312 Existing Garage Door New Slider (Behind) Existing Garage Door New Slider (Behind)Existing (garden) nook, not fenestration SHEET TITLE INTEGRATED DESIGN TEAM PROJECT NO: MODEL FILE: DRAWN BY: COPYRIGHT: SHEET 24 A201 Jeffrey H Woodruff 312_W_Hyman_06102022.pln Project No. 116 /Users/jeffrey/Documents/Cloud Hill/312 06 22/312_W_Hyman_06102022.plnPowder Day Skiiing, LLC, David A Tarrab Mees Elevations Proposed 312 W Hyman Ave 312 W Hyman Ave Lots P+Q, Block 46 Aspen CO 81611 USA/ Pitkin County UGB, City of Aspen 312 W Hyman Ave Aspen CO 81611 USA Account # R000145 Parcel ID # 273512464006 Landscape Architect Jennifer M. Dolecki-Smith, RLA Escape Garden Design, LLC Interior Design Travis Terry Travis Terry Design Contractor (At Final) Structural Engineer (As per contractor) Civil Grading and Drainage Jay Engstrom, P.E. Crystal River Civil, LLC COA- HPO Site Visit08/22/21 Jeffrey H. Woodruff AIA, LEED AP Cloud Hill Design, LLC Snowmass Snowmass CO 81654 USA COA- HPC Conceptual02/26/22 COA- HPC Conceptual04/27/22 ±0" 1 First Floor ±0" 1 First Floor +9'-3" 2 Second Floor +9'-3" 2 Second Floor +18'-3" 3 Roof +18'-3" 3 Roof Existing CMU Existing Wood Eave Triangular Fenestration, As per revised guidance ±0" 1 First Floor +9'-3" 2 Second Floor +18'-3" 3 Roof 22'-1 5/16" 25'-0" 12'-0 15/32" Existing WoodNew Wood Existing Opening Existing Wood Existing CMU Existing CMU New Stucco New Standing Seam SCALE: 1/4" = 1'-0" 1 South Elevation A201 SCALE: 1/4" = 1'-0" 2 West Elevation A201 SCALE: 1/4" = 1'-0" 1 Existing South Elevation H5 SCALE: 1/4" = 1'-0" 3 Amendment H5 3 HPC approval granted on July 27, 2022 H5 • Received final HPC approval for additional removing attic vent (no dropped ceiling- replaced with sistered ridge beam, deeper rafters and 1" steel collar ties 48" inches oc.) • Replaced attic vent with window, to protect the Juliet balcony (swing in, rather than out). • Current garage door(s) have sliding glass wood framed doors behind. • One car garage and storage converted to habitable space, with no impact on street facing facade • Existing garage doors act as shutters, with same RO • Fence approved as per HPC Final Approval. • Added gutters and downspouts, not-obstructing existing decorative fascia. Gutters and downspouts as per City of Aspen Ord. 40 Series 2016 • Removed snow pipes, added snow clips. • Lamps are at all egress from the chalet and detached garage. The architect recommends using a 30-60 degree beam spread lamp (downlight) with jelly jars. The chalet requests a variance for luminaire height, utilizing existing j-boxes already in the structure (rather than conforming to 2023 mounting heights. Meeting international dark sky compliance as well as the current and proposed lighting code- but maintaining existing mounting heights and punctures (j-boxes) to the structure. 27 March 2023 SHEET TITLE INTEGRATED DESIGN TEAM PROJECT NO: MODEL FILE: DRAWN BY: COPYRIGHT: SHEET 37 H6 Jeffrey H Woodruff 312_W_Hyman_03312023.pln Project No. 116 /Users/jeffrey/Documents/Cloud Hill/Rainbow/structural/312_W_Hyman_03312023.plnPowder Day Skiiing, LLC, David A Tarrab Mees Historic, Approved, Substantial 312 W Hyman Ave 312 W Hyman Ave Lots P+Q, Block 46 Aspen CO 81611 USA/ Pitkin County UGB, City of Aspen 312 W Hyman Ave Aspen CO 81611 USA Account # R000145 Parcel ID # 273512464006 Landscape Architect Jennifer M. Dolecki-Smith, RLA Escape Garden Design, LLC Civil Grading and Drainage Jay Engstrom, P.E. Crystal River Civil, LLC Structural Engineer Brian Rossiter, P.E. bwr.pe Contractor COA- HPO Site Visit08/22/21 Jeffrey H. Woodruff AIA, LEED AP Cloud Hill Design, LLC Snowmass CO 81654 USA COA- HPC Conceptual02/26/22 COA- HPC Conceptual04/27/22 COA- HPC Final07/27/22 COA- City Council Call Up10/12/22 COA- HPC Final04/12/23 ±0" 1 First Floor ±0" 1 First Floor +9'-3" 2 Second Floor +9'-3" 2 Second Floor +18'-3" 3 Roof +18'-3" 3 Roof ±0" 1 First Floor +9'-3" 2 Second Floor +18'-3" 3 Roof 22'-1 5/16" 25'-0" 13'-6 15/32" Existing WoodNew Wood Existing Opening Existing Wood Existing CMU Existing CMU New Stucco New Standing Seam W G1 D G1 W 6E W 16W W 15W W SKY1 W 6W D 6W W 5W D 2S SHEET TITLE INTEGRATED DESIGN TEAM PROJECT NO: MODEL FILE: DRAWN BY: COPYRIGHT: SHEET 24 A201 Jeffrey H Woodruff 312_W_Hyman_06102022.pln Project No. 116 /Users/jeffrey/Documents/Cloud Hill/312 06 22/312_W_Hyman_06102022.plnPowder Day Skiiing, LLC, David A Tarrab Mees Elevations Proposed 312 W Hyman Ave 312 W Hyman Ave Lots P+Q, Block 46 Aspen CO 81611 USA/ Pitkin County UGB, City of Aspen 312 W Hyman Ave Aspen CO 81611 USA Account # R000145 Parcel ID # 273512464006 Landscape ArchitectJennifer M. Dolecki-Smith, RLAEscape Garden Design, LLCInterior DesignTravis TerryTravis Terry DesignContractor (At Final)Structural Engineer (As per contractor)Civil Grading and DrainageJay Engstrom, P.E.Crystal River Civil, LLC COA- HPO Site Visit08/22/21 Jeffrey H. WoodruffAIA, LEED APCloud Hill Design, LLCSnowmass Snowmass CO81654 USA COA- HPC Conceptual02/26/22 COA- HPC Conceptual04/27/22 ±0" 1 First Floor ±0" 1 First Floor +9'-3" 2 Second Floor +9'-3" 2 Second Floor +18'-3"3 Roof +18'-3"3 Roof Existing CMU Existing WoodEave Triangular Fenestration,As per revised guidance ±0" 1 First Floor +9'-3" 2 Second Floor +18'-3" 3 Roof 22'-1 5/16" 25'-0" 12'-0 15/32" Existing WoodNew Wood Existing Opening Existing Wood Existing CMU Existing CMU New Stucco New Standing Seam SCALE: 1/4" = 1'-0" 1 South Elevation A201 SCALE: 1/4" = 1'-0" 2 West Elevation A201 SCALE: 1/4" = 1'-0" 1 Existing West Elevation H6 SCALE: 1/4" = 1'-0" 3 Substantial Amendment H6 3 HPC approval granted on July 27, 2022 H6 • HPC Granted a 7.4' combined side yard set back at Final 2022 • Gutters and downspouts • Removal of Trees #1 and therefore #2 • Additional dry well (North of Structure, south of drip lines (trees #3, 4, 5) • North addition • Replace non-historic entry door with wood entry door with sidelights. • Removed snow pipes, specified snow guards on East and West Gables as per city, not as per mfr. • No change to 2013 roof material, 3 layer, torch applied asphalt • Requesting 5.4' Combined side yard setback at Final 2023 (East @ 2.4 + West @ 3). Change requested given new plumb retaining wall @ St Moritz at 2' from the property line (leaving 5' between the 6' retaining wall and the single story garage). HPC is the decision making body for the variance. 27 March 2023 SHEET TITLE INTEGRATED DESIGN TEAM PROJECT NO: MODEL FILE: DRAWN BY: COPYRIGHT: SHEET 38 H7 Jeffrey H Woodruff 312_W_Hyman_03312023.pln Project No. 116 /Users/jeffrey/Documents/Cloud Hill/Rainbow/structural/312_W_Hyman_03312023.plnPowder Day Skiiing, LLC, David A Tarrab Mees Historic Precedent and Palette 312 W Hyman Ave 312 W Hyman Ave Lots P+Q, Block 46 Aspen CO 81611 USA/ Pitkin County UGB, City of Aspen 312 W Hyman Ave Aspen CO 81611 USA Account # R000145 Parcel ID # 273512464006 Landscape Architect Jennifer M. Dolecki-Smith, RLA Escape Garden Design, LLC Civil Grading and Drainage Jay Engstrom, P.E. Crystal River Civil, LLC Structural Engineer Brian Rossiter, P.E. bwr.pe Contractor COA- HPO Site Visit08/22/21 Jeffrey H. Woodruff AIA, LEED AP Cloud Hill Design, LLC Snowmass CO 81654 USA COA- HPC Conceptual02/26/22 COA- HPC Conceptual04/27/22 COA- HPC Final07/27/22 COA- City Council Call Up10/12/22 COA- HPC Final04/12/23 Existing Green Exterior (Painted Wood) Existing Exterior @ Living Level Existing Exterior @ Eave Existing Exterior @ Garage Door Existing Exterior Stucco Over CMU @ Main Level Existing Exterior Banister @ Living Level Deck Existing Recycled Decking @ Living Level Deck Existing Maroon (Painted Wood) New Exterior Windows at Addition (only). Existing are double pane IGUs with E272, same glass as new) 1 Historic Precedent and Preservation Palette H7 2 Existing North Elevation H7 3 Existing East Elevation H7 4 Existing South Elevation H7 5 Exsting West Elevation H7 27 March 2023 SHEET TITLE INTEGRATED DESIGN TEAM PROJECT NO: MODEL FILE: DRAWN BY: COPYRIGHT: SHEET 39 H8 Jeffrey H Woodruff 312_W_Hyman_03312023.pln Project No. 116 /Users/jeffrey/Documents/Cloud Hill/Rainbow/structural/312_W_Hyman_03312023.plnPowder Day Skiiing, LLC, David A Tarrab Mees Landscape Approved Substantial 312 W Hyman Ave 312 W Hyman Ave Lots P+Q, Block 46 Aspen CO 81611 USA/ Pitkin County UGB, City of Aspen 312 W Hyman Ave Aspen CO 81611 USA Account # R000145 Parcel ID # 273512464006 Landscape Architect Jennifer M. Dolecki-Smith, RLA Escape Garden Design, LLC Civil Grading and Drainage Jay Engstrom, P.E. Crystal River Civil, LLC Structural Engineer Brian Rossiter, P.E. bwr.pe Contractor COA- HPO Site Visit08/22/21 Jeffrey H. Woodruff AIA, LEED AP Cloud Hill Design, LLC Snowmass CO 81654 USA COA- HPC Conceptual02/26/22 COA- HPC Conceptual04/27/22 COA- HPC Final07/27/22 COA- City Council Call Up10/12/22 COA- HPC Final04/12/23 308 sq ft 1,210.75 sq ft 5.00 1 '11.313'E EG OS W7904790379027901 7901 7901 79 0 2 7902 790379 0 3 7 9 0 4 Grav e l o f f alley 7901+ 7902.75 + 7901.36 7901.32 + + 7901.30 7901.32 + + 7901.23 + 7902.73 + 7906.99 7899.42 + + 7902.86 + 7902.80 + 7901.26 + 7901.23 + Inlet 7901.11 + Inlet 7901.11 + 7901.64 7901.33 + + 7901.32 + 7901.23 + 7901.23 + 7901.13 + 7901.13+ 7901.13 2% + 7901.29 + 7901.29 + 7901.33 8 0 8 16 Scale 1" = 8' 38 sq ft A A B B C C D D E E 4 4 3 3 2 2 1 1 F/R16'-0"43'-0"32'-7"23'-9"16'-3"1'-6 2 1 / 3 2 " 2'-4 7 / 8 "5'-0"11'-8 5 / 3 2 " 8'-2"10'-2"10'-0"4'-3"9'-0"11'-9"19'-3"32'-7"2'-0"5'-6 1/4"3'-1 5 1 / 6 4 "10'-5 15/32"21'-4 11/64"100' = 7901.31' 100' 100' = 7901.31' 1A300 1A301 2A301 2A300 4 Z004 1 A200 2 A200 2 Z003 2 A210 1 A211 3 A211 4 A211 #DrgID #LayID 2 A402 6 A401 4 A403 2 A404 3 A405 1 A408 1 A407 trees protected #3, #4, and # 5 to NE Plaster covered CMU wall with two layers of 5/8" Type X Gypsum, 1 hour fire wall, Cementitious soffit Proposed fence at the 5' side setback and 5' rear setback, lined on the South with shrubs, see landscaping plan St Moritz R e t a i n i n g w a l l ( n e w , plum and 2' f r o m p r o p e r t y l i n e ) Removal of Tr e e # 2 Removal of Tre e # 1 Existing dry well With new pl u m r e t a i n i n g w a l l , structure is 7 . 0 0 1 ' f r o m t h e nearest stuct u r e UP bedroom #2 bathe #3 mechanical #2, hw, wstrash, c o m p o s t , r e c y c l i n g bathe #2 closet boot c u b b i e s & bench bedroom #3 main entry heat pumps (2) electric meters (2) gas & radon egress egress egress entry w/d garden storage 1/2 bathe cabinet 312 West Hyman Garage F.F.E. = 7902.86 312 West Hyman "Bedroom" F.F.E. = 7901.31 F.F.E. = 7901.36' F.F.E. = 7901.36' F.F.E. = 7901.33' niche mirror benchmud hooks bench hall closetopen shelvescounterfireplace appliance old 100, cubbies mechanical#11 A400 308 sq ft 1,210.75 sq ft 5.00 1 '11.313'E EG OS W7904790379027901 7901 7901 79 0 2 7902 790379 0 3 7 9 0 4 Grav e l o f f alley 7901+ 7902.75 + 7901.36 7901.32 + + 7901.30 7901.32 + + 7901.23 + 7902.98 + 7906.99 + 7902.86 + 7902.80 + 7901.26 + 7901.23 + Inlet 7901.11 + Inlet 7901.11 + 7901.64 7901.33 + + 7901.32 + 7901.23 + 7901.13 + 7901.13+ 7901.13 2% + 7901.29 + 7901.29 + 7901.33 7901.23 + + 7902.98 7902.39 + 7901.81 + 3' 2'-6" 8 0 8 16 Scale 1" = 8' 1 HPC approval granted on July 27, 2022 H8 2 Substantial H8 • HPC Granted a 7.4' combined side yard set back at Final 2022 • Requesting 5.4' Combined side yard setback at Susbtantial 2023 (East @ 2.4 + West @ 3). Change requested given new plumb retaining wall @ St Moritz at 2' from the property line (leaving 5' between the 6' retaining wall and the single story garage). HPC is the decision making body for the variance. SHEET TITLE INTEGRATED DESIGN TEAM PROJECT NO: MODEL FILE: DRAWN BY: COPYRIGHT: SHEET 40 H9 Jeffrey H Woodruff 312_W_Hyman_03312023.pln Project No. 116 /Users/jeffrey/Documents/Cloud Hill/Rainbow/structural/312_W_Hyman_03312023.plnPowder Day Skiiing, LLC, David A Tarrab Mees Civil Approved, Substantial 312 W Hyman Ave 312 W Hyman Ave Lots P+Q, Block 46 Aspen CO 81611 USA/ Pitkin County UGB, City of Aspen 312 W Hyman Ave Aspen CO 81611 USA Account # R000145 Parcel ID # 273512464006 Landscape Architect Jennifer M. Dolecki-Smith, RLA Escape Garden Design, LLC Civil Grading and Drainage Jay Engstrom, P.E. Crystal River Civil, LLC Structural Engineer Brian Rossiter, P.E. bwr.pe Contractor COA- HPO Site Visit08/22/21 Jeffrey H. Woodruff AIA, LEED AP Cloud Hill Design, LLC Snowmass CO 81654 USA COA- HPC Conceptual02/26/22 COA- HPC Conceptual04/27/22 COA- HPC Final07/27/22 COA- City Council Call Up10/12/22 COA- HPC Final04/12/23EEGXWSXWSXWSXWSXWSXWSXWSXWSXWSXWSXWSXWSXWSXWSXWXWXWXWXWXWXWXWXWXWXWXWXWXWXWXWXWXWXWXWXWXWXWXWXWXWXGXGXGXGXGXGXGXGXGXGXGXGXGXGXGXGXGXGXUEXUEXUEXUEXUEXUEXUEXUEXUEXUEXUEXUEXUEXUEXUEXUEXUEXUEXUEXUEXUEXUE X U E X U E X U E X U E X U E X U E X U E X U E X U E X U E X U E X U E X U E X U E XTXTXTXTXTXTXTXTXTXTXTXTXTXTXTXTXTXTXTXTXT XT XT XTXT XT X T X T X T X T X T XT X T X T X T X T X T X T X T X T XCXCXCXCXCXCXCXCXCXCXCXCXCXCXCXCXCXCXCXCXC XCXC XCXC X C X C X C X C X C X C X C X C X C X C X C X C X C X C X C XGXGXGXGXGXGXGXGXGXGXGXGXGXGXGXGXGXGXGXGXGXG X T X T X T XUEXUEXUEXSSXSSXSSXSSXSSXSSXSSXSSXSSXSSXSSXSSXSSXSSXSSXSSXSSXSSXSSXSSXSSXSSXSSXSSXSSXSSXSSXSSXSSXSSXSSXSS XSS XSS XSS XSS XSS XSS XSS XSS XSS XSS XSS XSS XSS XSS XSS XSS 1.31 1.31 1.31 1.07 0.89 1.12 1.23 1.32 1.32 1.17 1.01 1.01 1.10 1.23 1.30 1.30 1.32 1.32 1.23 1.26 1.22 1.32 1.32 1.32 1.23 1.23 1.23 1.17 1.23 1.29 1.29 1.23 1.79 1.93 TBC:1.88 3.17 3.05 TBC:1.66 1.31 Inlet:1.11 Inlet:0.90 Inlet:1.11 2.86 2.75 2.86 2.38 2.37 2.38 2.38 2.86 2.86 2.82 2.72 3.69 2.01 7902 7902 7902TBC:1.58 1.27 2.8%2.2%2.1%2.0% Inlet:2.31 1.64 1.33 1.15 1.10 312 West Hyman Main Residence 1.26 Inlet:1.11 312 West Hyman Garage F.F.E. = 7902.86'Garage F .F .E . = 7901 .31 ' F.F.E. = 7 9 0 1. 3 6' F.F.E. = 7 9 0 1. 3 3'F.F .E . = 7901 .36 ' Self Contained Spa WL = 7902.23' 2.73 2.0% Sandset Flagstone Walkway Exist. Retaining Wall To Remain Gravel DrivewaySod Concret e Ri b b o n D ri v e w a y 4.1% Dryset Steppingstone Path Sandset Flagstone Patio Prop. Stormwater Detention DrywellSandset Flagsto n e P ati o (3) 6" Steps 2.80 2.80 79037901 79027 9 0 1 79 0 2 7903 7904 7902 Property Line (Typ.) Setback Line (Typ.) Stone Curb 1.26 1.26 1.31 Paver Patio 1.17 1.86 8.7%Alley(Gravel)West Hyman Avenue(Asphalt)Exist. Vegetation (Typ.) Sod Inlet:0.857901 Exist. Stormwater Detention Drywell 0.91 0.93 0.96 0.98 Utility Meters To Remain Spa Mechanical Access Hatch9.002.003.002.002.00 12.00 Drawing Scale Units (Feet) 1" = 5' 0 5 10NSWE C.001 Grading Plan Of 5 Pages01Coordination Set07.26.2022VJT#DescriptionDateDrawn By312 West HymanAspen, Colorado 816111101 Village Road, Unit UL-4C Carbondale, CO 81623 (970) 510 - 5312 JKEReviewed ByNot For Construction Job #: 22.42 EEGXWS XWS XWS XWSXWSXWSXWSXWSXWSXWSXWSXWSXWSXWSXWXWXWXWXWXWXWXWXWXWXWXWXWXWXWXWXWXWXWXWXWXWXWXWXWXWXGXGXGXGXGXGXGXGXGXGXGXGXGXGXGXGXGXGXUEXUEXUEXUEXUEXUEXUEXUEXUEXUEXUEXUEXUEXUEXUEXUEXUEXUEXUEXUEXUEXUE X U E X U E X U E X U E X U E X U E X U E X U E X U E X U E X U E X U E X U E X U E XTXTXTXTXTXTXTXTXTXTXTXTXTXTXTXTXTXTXTXTXT XTXT XTXT X T X T X T X T X T X T X T X T X T X T X T X T X T X T X T XCXCXCXCXCXCXCXCXCXCXCXCXCXCXCXCXCXCXCXCXC XCXC XCXC X C X C X C X C X C X C X C X C X C X C X C X C X C X C X C XGXGXGXGXGXGXGXG X T X T X T XUEXUEXUEXSSXSSXSSXSSXSSXSSXSSXSSXSSXSSXSSXSSXSSXSSXSSXSSXSSXSSXSSXSSXSSXSSXSSXSSXSSXSSXSSXSSXSSXSSXSSXSS XSS XSS XSS XSS <GGGGGGGGGGGGGG GGGGGGGGS SSSSSSSSSS S SSSSSSSSSSSSSSSS SSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSUEUEUEUEUEUE1.31 1.31 1.31 1.07 0.89 1.12 1.23 1.32 1.32 1.09 1.21 1.23 1.30 1.30 1.32 1.32 1.25 1.24 1.32 1.32 1.32 1.23 1.17 1.23 1.29 1.29 1.211.79 1.93 TBC:1.88 3.17 3.09 TBC:1.66 1.31 Inlet:1.11 Inlet:0.90 Inlet:1.11 2.54 2.86 2.86 2.38 2.33 2.38 2.35 2.86 2.86 2.82 2.72 3.69 2.01 7902 7902 7902TBC:1.58 1.28 2.8%2.2%2.1%2.0% Inlet:2.31 1.64 1.33 1.15 1.10 312 West Hyman Main Residence 1.26 Inlet:1.11 312 West Hyman Garage F.F.E. = 7902.86'Garage F .F .E . = 7901 .31 ' F.F.E. = 7 9 0 1. 3 6' F.F.E. = 7 9 0 1. 3 3'F.F .E . = 7901 .36 ' 1.14 2.0% Sandset Flagstone Walkway Neighboring Concrete Retaining Wall Currently Under Construction Gravel DrivewaySod Crushe r Fi n e s Ribbon Dri v e w a y 4.1% Dryset Steppingstone Path Sandset Flagstone Patio Prop. Stormwater Detention DrywellSandset Flagsto n e P ati o (3) 6" Steps 2.80 2.80 79037901 79027 9 0 1 79 0 2 7903 7904 7902 Property Line (Typ.) Setback Line (Typ.) Stone Curb 1.26 1.26 1.31 Paver Patio 1.17 1.86 8.7%Alley(Gravel)West Hyman Avenue(Asphalt)Exist. Vegetation (Typ.) Sod Inlet:0.857901 Exist. Stormwater Detention Drywell 0.91 0.93 0.96 0.98 Utility Meters To Be Relocated On Proposed Addition Spa Mechanical Access Hatch 12.00 3.0% 3.4% Exist. Planter To Remain Exist. Planter To Remain 5.0% 5.0% 3.1% 8.0% Exist. Stormwater System From Deck To Remain Breakline Self Contained Spa Top Of Spa Elev. = 7902.98' 1.17 1.04 Stone Perimeter Deck Elev. = 7902.98' (4) 6" Stone Risers To Spa Deck1.002.003.002.002.003.003.00 3.0020.3611.773.332.003.002.001.00 Crusher Fi n e s Ribbon D ri v e w a y 3.00Drawing Scale Units (Feet) 1" = 5' 0 5 10NSWE C.004 Grading Plan Of 11 Pages01HPC Submission07.27.2022VJT#DescriptionDateDrawn By312 West HymanAspen, Colorado 816111101 Village Road, Unit UL-4C Carbondale, CO 81623 (970) 510 - 5312 JKEReviewed ByFor Construction Job #: 22.4202Permit Set10.27.2022VJTJKE1HPC approval granted on July 27, 2022H92SubstantialH9 • HPC Granted a 7.4' combined side yard set back at Final 2022 • Requesting 5.4' Combined side yard setback at Susbtantial 2023 (East @ 2.4 + West @ 3). Change requested given new plumb retaining wall @ St Moritz at 2' from the property line (leaving 5' between the 6' retaining wall and the single story garage). HPC is the decision making body for the variance. SHEET TITLE INTEGRATED DESIGN TEAM PROJECT NO: MODEL FILE: DRAWN BY: COPYRIGHT: SHEET 41 A101 Jeffrey H Woodruff 312_W_Hyman_03312023.pln Project No. 116 /Users/jeffrey/Documents/Cloud Hill/Rainbow/structural/312_W_Hyman_03312023.plnPowder Day Skiiing, LLC, David A Tarrab Mees Architectural Site Plan 312 W Hyman Ave 312 W Hyman Ave Lots P+Q, Block 46 Aspen CO 81611 USA/ Pitkin County UGB, City of Aspen 312 W Hyman Ave Aspen CO 81611 USA Account # R000145 Parcel ID # 273512464006 Landscape Architect Jennifer M. Dolecki-Smith, RLA Escape Garden Design, LLC Civil Grading and Drainage Jay Engstrom, P.E. Crystal River Civil, LLC Structural Engineer Brian Rossiter, P.E. bwr.pe Contractor COA- HPO Site Visit08/22/21 Jeffrey H. Woodruff AIA, LEED AP Cloud Hill Design, LLC Snowmass CO 81654 USA COA- HPC Conceptual02/26/22 COA- HPC Conceptual04/27/22 COA- HPC Final07/27/22 COA- City Council Call Up10/12/22 COA- HPC Final04/12/23 1,227 sq ft 38 sq ft A A B B C C D D E E 4 4 3 3 2 2 1 1 1.55 5 ' 2.40 6 ' 11.6 8 ' 5.00 1 ' 3'-0" 314.25 sq ft 28.5 sq ft Proposed fence at the 5' side setback and 5' rear setback, lined on the South with shrubs, see landscaping plan St Moritz R e t a i n i n g w a l l ( n e w , plum and 2 ' f r o m p r o p e r t y l i n e ) , approx. 6' h i g h Removal of T r e e # 2 Removal of T r e e # 1 Existing dry well With new p l u m r e t a i n i n g w a l l , structure is 7 . 0 0 1 ' f r o m t h e nearest str u c t u r e 8" CMU w a l l , d e s i g n U 9 0 4 , exceeds 1 h r f i r e r a t i n g , f u l l y grouted bel o w g r a d e , a s p e r struct. Requesting c o m b i n e d 5 . 4 ' Setback as p e r n e w p l u m b 6 ' concrete w a l l . NCS Wall Label 26 This label is not available for Independent Labels. existing encroachment, re m o v e railroad ties E EG OS W1 2 3 4 5 678 9 10 11 121314 15 16790479037902 7901 7901 7902 790179 0 2 7902 790379 0 3 7 9 0 4 10' R E A R S E T B A C K - P R I N C I P A L B U I L D I N G 5' R E A R S E T B A C K - P R I N C I P A L B U I L D I N G U S E D A S G A R A G E & AC C E S S O R Y B U I L D I N G 5' MINIMUM SIDE SETBACK10' F R O N T S E T B A C K PRI N C I P A L B U I L D I N G 15' F R O N T S E T B A C K ACC E S S O R Y B U I L D I N G 312 West Hyman Garage F.F.E. = 7902.86 312 West Hyman "Bedroom" F.F.E. = 7901.31 F.F.E. = 7901.36' F.F.E. = 7901.36' F.F.E. = 7901.33' mech. #1, 38 sq. ft./ #2, hw, ws 5' side 42" w x 51" h x 17" deep cshp/12" AFF rack mounted, with architectural louvers M I (S75 ° 1 1 ' 0 9 " E 6 0 . 0 0 ' ) S7 5 ° 1 4 ' 5 8 " E 5 8 . 5 9 ' E E G (N14°50'49"E 100.00') N15°05'12"E99.90' S14°50'49"W 100.00'N75 ° 0 9 ' 1 1 " W 6 0 . 0 0 ' BAS I S O F B E A R I N G S FOUND N O . 5 R E B A R FOUND N O . 5 R E B A R FOUND N O . 5 R E B A R SITE BEN C H M A R K SET FOUN D N O . 5 R E B A R & 1-1/4" ORA N G E P L A S T I C C A P PROP CO R N E R T N C P L S 3 8 2 1 5 ELEVATIO N : 7 9 0 0 . 8 4 (20. 9 0 ' W I D E ) GR A V E L A L L E Y ALL E Y BL O C K 4 6 LO T P LO T Q LO T O LO T N LO T R LO T S W. H Y M A N A V E N U E (74. 8 0 ' W I D E P U B L I C ) SE CORN E R BLOCK 46 FOUND R E B A R & 1 - 1 / 2 " ALUMINU M C A P (NO STAM P I N G ) N75 ° 0 9 ' 1 1 " W 5 9 . 9 2 ' (60. 0 0 ' ) 33.4' 4.0' 4.9' 8.3' 5.5' 11.5'0.7' 0.7'2.2'0.8' 0.7' 0.7'0.8'2.2'9.2'0.8'0.8'38.4'21.2'7.2'11.1 ' ( T I E )19.8'(TIE)0.8'2.4' (TIE )13.4'5.5' APPAREN TENCROAC H M E N TDRIVEWA Y &WOOD RE T A I N I N G GRAVEL DRIVEWA YWOOD RETAININGWOOD RETAININGAPPAREN T ENCROAC H M E N T R.R. TIE WALL CONCRETE APRON UPPER DECK STEPS FLAGSTO N E PATIO SIDEWALK2 - STOR Y FRAME H O U S E & GARAGE312 WEST H Y M A N A V E N U E 0.137± AC R E S5976± SQ. F T .NEIGHBORING RESIDENCECO N C R E T E C U R B & G U T T E R PAV E D R O A D W A Y MAI L B O X 4.4' APPAREN T ENCROAC H M E N T WOOD RE T A I N I N G OS WN6 7 ° 5 3 ' 3 3 " W 1 2 3 7 . 0 4 ' ( T I E ) CITY OF A S P E N GPS MON U M E N T # 7 CITY OF A S P E N GPS MON U M E N T # 6 ELEVATIO N : 7 8 9 3 . 6 1 S86°19' 5 1 " E 8 1 8 . 1 0 ' ( T I E ) 1 2 3 4 5 6 78 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 GARAGE 7901.31 FFE 7901.36 FFE 7901.33 SOUTH 2nd STREET(74.62' WIDE PUBLIC)79047903 790279017901 7901 790179 0 2 7902 790379 0 3 7 9 0 4 10' R E A R S E T B A C K - P R I N C I P A L B U I L D I N G 5' R E A R S E T B A C K - P R I N C I P A L B U I L D I N G U S E D A S G A R A G E & A C C E S S O R Y B U I L D I N G 5' MINIMUM SIDE SETBACK5' MINIMUM SIDE SETBACK10' F R O N T S E T B A C K PRI N C I P A L B U I L D I N G 15' F R O N T S E T B A C K ACC E S S O R Y B U I L D I N G CLERK AND RECORDER'S CERTIFICATETHIS PLAT WAS FILED FOR RECORD IN THE OFFICE OF THE CLERK AND RECORDER OF PITKIN COUNTY AT ____O'CLOCK____.M., ON THE ____ DAY OF__________, A.D. 20__, AND IS DULY RECORDED IN BOOK _____,PAGE ______, RECEPTION NO.______________________. ______________________________________ CLERK AND RECORDER BY:____________________________________ DEPUTY SURVEYOR'S STATEMENT I, RODNEY P. KISER, DO HEREBY STATE THAT THIS SURVEY WAS PREPARED BY TRUE NORTH COLORADO, LLC. FOR ______________________________________, THAT SAID SURVEY WAS PREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY SUPERVISION AND RESPONSIBLE CHARGE AND THAT IT IS TRUE AND CORRECT TO THE BEST OF MY BELIEF AND KNOWLEDGE. RODNEY P. KISER, PLS 38215 COLORADO PROFESSIONAL SURVEYOR COUNTY SURVEYOR'S CERTIFICATE DEPOSITED THIS _____ DAY OF __________________, 20__, AT________M., IN THE GARFIELD COUNTY INDEX FOR INFORMATIONAL LAND SURVEY PLATS UNDER RECEPTION NUMBER _______________________. BY: _____________________________________ GARFIELD COUNTY SURVEYOR DATE:____________________________________ FILING INFORMATION: SECTION ____, TOWNSHIP ____, RANGE ____, OF THE 6TH P.M. IT IS THE INDIVIDUAL LOT OWNER'S RESPONSIBILITY, ACCORDING TO THE COLORADO NOXIOUS WEED ACT AND GARFIELD COUNTY'S WEED MANAGEMENT PLAN, TO MANAGE ANY NOXIOUS WEEDS ON HIS OR HER PROPERTY. SUBJECT TO PATENT RESERVATIONS, THE MINERAL RIGHTS TO THIS REAL PROPERTY ARE NOT SEVERED FROM THE SURFACE, AND ARE NOT UNDER LEASE. MINERAL RIGHTS: COMMITMENT FOR TITLE INSURANCE ISSUED BY LAND TITLE GUARANTEE COMPANY, ORDER NUMBER ________, DISCLOSES THE FOLLOWING MINERAL RIGHTS: RIGHT OF THE PROPRIETOR OF A VEIN OR LOAD TO EXTRACT OR REMOVE ORE THEREFROM, SHOULD THE SAME BE FOUND TO PENETRATE OR INTERSECT THE PREMISES, AS RESERVED IN UNITED STATES PATENT RECORDED MAY 3, 1921 IN BOOK 73 AT PAGE 126. ONE (1) DOG WILL BE ALLOWED FOR EACH RESIDENTIAL UNIT AND THE DOG SHALL BE REQUIRED TO BE CONFINED WITHIN THE OWNERS' PROPERTY BOUNDARIES. NO OPEN HEARTH SOLID-FUEL FIREPLACES WILL BE ALLOWED ANYWHERE WITHIN THE SUBDIVISION. ONE (1) NEW SOLID-FUEL BURNING STOVE AS DEFINED BY C.R.S. 25-7-401, ET. SEQ., AND THE REGULATIONS PROMULGATED THEREUNDER, WILL BE ALLOWED IN ANY DWELLING UNIT. ALL DWELLING UNITS WILL BE ALLOWED AN UNRESTRICTED NUMBER OF NATURAL GAS BURNING STOVES AND APPLIANCES. ALL EXTERIOR LIGHTING WILL BE THE MINIMUM AMOUNT NECESSARY AND ALL EXTERIOR LIGHTING WILL BE DIRECTED INWARD AND DOWNWARD, TOWARDS THE INTERIOR OF THE SUBDIVISION, EXCEPT THAT PROVISIONS MAY BE MADE TO ALLOW FOR SAFETY LIGHTING THAT GOES BEYOND THE PROPERTY BOUNDARIES. NO FURTHER DIVISIONS OF LAND WITHIN THE SUBDIVISION WILL BE ALLOWED. COLORADO IS A "RIGHT-TO-FARM" STATE PURSUANT TO C.R.S. 35-3-101, ET SEQ. LANDOWNERS, RESIDENTS AND VISITORS MUST BE PREPARED TO ACCEPT THE ACTIVITIES, SIGHTS, SOUNDS AND SMELLS OF GARFIELD COUNTY'S AGRICULTURAL OPERATIONS AS A NORMAL AND NECESSARY ASPECT OF LIVING IN A COUNTY WITH A STRONG RURAL CHARACTER AND A HEALTHY RANCHING SECTOR. ALL MUST BE PREPARED TO ENCOUNTER NOISES, ODOR, LIGHTS, MUD, DUST, SMOKE, CHEMICALS, MACHINERY ON PUBLIC ROADS, LIVESTOCK ON PUBLIC ROADS, STORAGE AND DISPOSAL OF MANURE, AND THE APPLICATION BY SPRAYING OR OTHERWISE OF CHEMICAL FERTILIZERS, SOIL AMENDMENTS, HERBICIDES, AND PESTICIDES, ANY ONE OR MORE OF WHICH MAY NATURALLY OCCUR AS PART OF A LEGAL AND NON-NEGLIGENT AGRICULTURAL OPERATIONS. ALL RESIDENCES OVER 3,600 SQUARE FEET IN SIZE SHALL HAVE AUTOMATIC FIRE SPRINKLERS INSTALLED. INSTALLATION OF THE SPRINKLER SYSTEMS SHALL BE IN ACCORDANCE WITH NFPA 13D, STANDARD FOR THE INSTALLATION OF SPRINKLER SYSTEMS IN ONE AND TWO-FAMILY DWELLINGS AND MANUFACTURED HOMES. ALL ROADWAYS WITHIN THE DEVELOPMENT SHALL BE DEDICATED TO THE PUBLIC AND CONSTRUCTED TO STANDARDS CONSISTENT WITH SECTION 9:00 OF THE SUBDIVISION REGULATIONS OF 1984, AS AMENDED; REPAIR AND MAINTENANCE SHALL BE THE RESPONSIBILITY OF THE HOMEOWNERS ASSOCIATION OF THE SUBDIVISION. TREE TYPE SIZE DRIP TREE CHART 1 DECIDUOUS2 XX"XX' XX"XX' CONIFEROUS Signature Blocks for Pitkin County partial list provided by Planning Department 2010. PITKIN COUNTY HEARING OFFICER APROVAL THIS ACTIVITY ENVELOPE AND SITE PLAN HAS BEEN REVIEWED AND APPROVED BY THE HEARING OFFICER THIS _____ DAY OF ______, 20__, SUBJECT TO THE TERMS AND CONDITIONS OF THE HEARING OFFICER DETERMINATION NO. _______ RECORDED IN THE PITKIN COUNTY CLERK AND RECORDER'S OFFICE AS RECEPTION NO. ______. _________________________________________ PITKIN COUNTY HEARING OFFICER PITKIN COUNTY COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DIRECTOR APPROVAL THIS ACTIVITY ENVELOPE AND SITE PLAN HAS BEEN REVIEWED AND APPROVED BY THE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DIRECTOR THIS _____ DAY OF ______, 20__, SUBJECT TO THE TERMS AND CONDITIONS OF THE ADMINISTRATIVE DECISION NO. _______ RECORDED IN THE PITKIN COUNTY CLERK AND RECORDER'S OFFICE AS RECEPTION NO. __________. ___________________________________ COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DIRECTOR PITKIN COUNTY BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS THIS PLAT OF _____________________ HAS BEEN REVIEWED AND APPROVED BY THE PITKIN COUNTY BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS THIS _______ DAY OF ______, 20__. APPROVAL OF THIS PLAT IS SUBJECT TO THE TERMS AND CONDITIONS OF RESOLUTION NUMBER(S) _________ AND RECORDED AT RECEPTION NO. _____. THE DEDICATION OF ROADS IS ACCEPTED SUBJECT TO THE CONDITIONS THAT PITKIN COUNTY SHALL UNDERTAKE MAINTENANCE OF SUCH ROADS ONLY AFTER CONSTRUCTION OF SUCH ROADS HAS BEEN COMPLETED IN ACCORDANCE WITH PITKIN COUNTY SPECIFICATIONS AND THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS DOES NOT EXTEND TO UTILITIES, WASTE DISPOSAL SYSTEMS, OR ANY SERVICE FACILITIES. ____________________________________ CHAIRPERSON, BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS AMENDED PLAT (OR SITE PLAN)APPROVAL AND DEDICATION THIS AMENDED PLAT (OR SITE PLAN) OF ___________________ IS HEREBY APPROVED THIS _____ DAY OF _____, 20__. SUBJECT TO THE TERMS AND CONDITIONS OF [RESOLUTION, OR ADMINISTRATIVE DECISION, OR HEARING OFFICER DETERMINATION] NO. _________________. EXCEPT AS MODIFIED BY SUCH [RESOLUTION, OR ADMINISTRATIVE DECISION, OR HEARING OFFICER DETERMINATION], THE ORIGINAL PLAT (OR SITE PLAN) RECORDED AT BOOK _____ AND PAGE _____ AND THE CONDITIONS THEREOF REMAIN IN FULL FORCE AND EFFECT. ________________________________ PITKIN COUNTY HEARING OFFICER; OR PITKIN COUNTY COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT; OR CHAIRMAN, BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS CLERK AND RECORDER ACCEPTANCE FOR RECORDING THIS ACTIVITY ENVELOPE AND SITE PLAN HAS BEEN ACCEPTED FOR FILING IN THE OFFICE OF THE CLERK & RECORDER OF PITKIN COUNTY, COLORADO, ON THIS _______ DAY OF _______, 20__, IN PLAT BOOK _____ AT PAGE ______. ____________________________ CLERK AND RECORDER DISCLAIMER ENVIRONMENTAL HAZARD AREAS EXIST THAT MIGHT AFFECT THE PROPERTY, ANY IMPROVEMENTS, AND THE USE AND OCCUPANCY HEREOF. _________________________________ PROPERTY OWNER SURVEYOR'S CERTIFICATE I, _____________________, REGISTERED LAND SURVEYOR, DO HEREBY CERTIFY THAT I HAVE PREPARED THE PLAT OF ____________, THAT THAT LOCATION OF THE OUTSIDE BOUNDARY, ROADS AND OTHER FEATURES ARE ACCURATELY AND CORRECTLY SHOWN HEREON, THAT THE SAME ARE BASED ON FIELD SURVEYS AND THAT THE PLATTED SITE AND ROADS CONFORM TO THOSE STAKED ON THE GROUND. IN WITNESS THEREOF, I HAVE SET MY HAND AND SEAL THIS ______ DAY OF ______, 20__. ________________________________ SURVEYOR DEDICATION OF RIGHTS-OF-WAY FOR UTILITY PURPOSES UNLESS OTHERWISE SPECIFIED, ALL UTILITY EASEMENTS, AS WELL AS PUBLIC AND PRIVATE RIGHTS-OF-WAY, SHOW HEREON, ARE DEDICATED TO THE PERPETUAL USE OF ALL UTILITY COMPANIES FOR THE PURPOSE OF INSTALLING, CONSTRUCTING, REPLACING, REPAIRING, AND MAINTAINING UNDERGROUND UTILITIES AND DRAINAGE FACILITIES, INCLUDING (BUT NOT LIMITED TO) WATER, SEWER, ELECTRIC, GAS, TELEPHONE AND TELEVISION LINES; TOGETHER WITH THE RIGHT OF INGRESS AND EGRESS FOR SUCH INSTALLATION, CONSTRUCTION, REPLACEMENT, REPAIR AND MAINTENANCE, AS WELL AS THE RIGHT TO TRIM INTERFERING TREES AND BRUSH. IN NO EVENT SHALL THE UTILITY COMPANIES EXERCISE THE RIGHTS HEREIN GRANTED SO AS TO INTERFERE WITH THE USE OF THE RIGHT-OF-WAY FOR ROADWAY PURPOSES EXCEPT TO THE EXTENT REASONABLY NECESSARY TO ENJOY THE GRANT HEREBY MADE. IMPROVEMENT SURVEY STATEMENT I HEREBY STATE THAT THIS IMPROVEMENT SURVEY WAS PREPARED BY TRUE NORTH COLORADO, LLC FOR ______________________. I FURTHER STATE THAT THE IMPROVEMENTS ON THE ABOVE DESCRIBED PARCEL ON THIS DATE, __________________________, EXCEPT UTILITY CONNECTIONS, ARE ENTIRELY WITHIN THE BOUNDARIES OF THE PARCEL, EXCEPT AS SHOWN, THAT THERE ARE NO ENCROACHMENTS UPON THE DESCRIBED PREMISES BY IMPROVEMENTS ON ANY ADJOINING PREMISES, EXCEPT AS INDICATED, AND THAT THERE IS NO APPARENT EVIDENCE OR SIGN OF ANY EASEMENT CROSSING OR BURDENING ANY PART OF SAID PARCEL, EXCEPT AS NOTED. LINER ERROR OF CLOSURE IS LESS THAN 1:10,000. RODNEY P. KISER, PLS 38215 COLORADO PROFESSIONAL SURVEYOR GARFIELD GENERAL PLAT NOTES 2009 CHECK REGS FOR UPDATES. LIENHOLDER CONSENT AND SUBORDINATION THE UNDERSIGNED, BEING THE BENEFICIARY UNDER A DEED OF TRUST GRANTED BY THE OWNER(S) UPON THE REAL PROPERTY PLATTED AND DIVIDED AS SHOWN UPON THE WITHIN FINAL PLAT OF __________________________SUBDIVISION, CERTIFIES THAT THE UNDERSIGNED HAS REVIEWED THE FINAL PLAT OF ___________________ SUBDIVISION AND BY THIS CERTIFICATION HEREBY CONSENTS TO SAID FINAL PLAT OF _______________ SUBDIVISION AND TO THE RECORDING THEREOF. BENEFICIARY FURTHER CONSENTS TO SAID FINAL PLAT OF __________________ SUBDIVISION AS STATED IN THE CERTIFICATE OF DEDICATION AND OWNERSHIP EXECUTED BY THE OWNER(S) HEREON, AND HEREBY SUBORDINATES ANY INTEREST THAT BENEFICIARY MAY HAVE IN AND TO THE PROPERTY SUBJECT TO SUCH DEDICATION, TO THE ENTITY(IES) OR THE GENERAL PUBLIC TO WHICH SUCH DEDICATION IS MADE. EXECUTED THIS _______ DAY OF _________________, A.D., 20__. MORTGAGE OR BANK NAME BY:________________________________ STATE OF______________ ) ) SS COUNTY OF ____________ ) THE FOREGOING LIENHOLDER CONSENT AND SUBORDINATION WAS ACKNOWLEDGED BEFORE ME THIS ____ DAY OF ___________________, 20__, BY ______________________. MY COMMISSION EXPIRES:________________________ WITNESS MY HAND AND SEAL: _____________________________ NOTARY PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT SURVEY PLAT GARFIELD COUNTY PLAT CERTS PITKIN PLAT CERTS SURVEYOR'S CERTIFICATE I, RODNEY P. KISER, DO HEREBY CERTIFY THAT I AM A PROFESSIONAL LAND SURVEYOR LICENSED UNDER THELAWS OF THE STATE OF COLORADO, THAT THIS FINAL PLAT IS A TRUE, CORRECT AND COMPLETE PLAT OF____________________________, AS LAID OUT, PLATTED, DEDICATED AND SHOWN HEREON, THAT SUCH PLAT WASMADE FROM AN ACCURATE SURVEY OF SAID PROPERTY BY ME AND UNDER MY SUPERVISION AND CORRECTLYSHOWS THE LOCATION AND DIMENSIONS OF THE LOTS, EASEMENTS AND STREETS OF ______________________ ASTHE SAME ARE STAKED UPON THE GROUND IN COMPLIANCE WITH APPLICABLE REGULATIONS GOVERNING THESUBDIVISION OF LAND. IN WITNESS WHEREOF I HAVE SET MY HAND AND SEAL THIS ____ DAY OF _______________, 20__. BY:_____________________________________ RODNEY P. KISER, PLS 38215 BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS CERTIFICATE THIS FINAL PLAT OF ____________________ IS APPROVED BY THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF GARFIELD COUNTY, COLORADO THIS ________ DAY OF _____________, 20__, FOR FILING WITH THE CLERK AND RECORDER OF GARFIELD COUNTY AND FOR CONVEYANCE TO THE COUNTY OF THE PUBLIC DEDICATIONS SHOWN HEREON, SUBJECT TO THE PROVISION THAT APPROVAL IN NO WAY OBLIGATES GARFIELD COUNTY FOR FINANCING OR CONSTRUCTION OF IMPROVEMENTS ON LANDS, PUBLIC ROADS, HIGHWAYS OR EASEMENTS DEDICATED TO THE PUBLIC, EXCEPT AS SPECIFICALLY AGREED TO BY THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS BY SUBSEQUENT RESOLUTION. THIS APPROVAL SHALL IN NO WAY OBLIGATE GARFIELD COUNTY FOR THE CONSTRUCTION, REPAIR OR MAINTENANCE OF PUBLIC ROADS, HIGHWAYS OR ANY OTHER PUBLIC DEDICATIONS SHOWN HEREON. BY:____________________________________ CHAIRMAN, BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS GARFIELD COUNTY, COLORADO WITNESS MY HAND AND THE SEAL OF THE COUNTY OF GARFIELD. ATTEST:_______________________________ COUNTY CLERK CERTIFICATE OF OWNERSHIP THE UNDERSIGNED _______________________, BEING SOLE OWNER(S) IN FEE SIMPLE OF ALL THAT REAL PROPERTY SITUATED IN GARFIELD COUNTY, DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: "INSERT PROPERTY DESCRIPTION" CONTAINING _____ ACRES, MORE OR LESS, HAVE CAUSED THE DESCRIBED REAL PROPERTY TO BE SURVEYED, LAID OUT, PLATTED AND SUBDIVIDED INTO LOTS AND BLOCKS AS SHOWN ON THIS FINAL PLAT UNDER THE NAME AND STYLE OF ___________________, A SUBDIVISION IN COUNTY OF GARFIELD. EXECUTED THIS ____ DAY OF _________________. A.D., 20__. OWNER: name and address STATE OF COLORADO ) )ss COUNTY OF GARFIELD ) THE FOREGOING CERTIFICATION OF OWNERSHIP WAS ACKNOWLEDGED BEFORE ME THIS _______ DAY OF_________________, 20__, BY_____________________. MY COMMISSION EXPIRES:________________________ WITNESS MY HAND AND SEAL __________________________________ NOTARY PUBLIC CERTIFICATE OF TAXES PAID I, THE UNDERSIGNED, DO HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THE ENTIRE AMOUNT OF TAXES AND ASSESSMENTS DUE AND PAYABLE AS OF______________, UPON ALL PARCELS OF REAL ESTATE DESCRIBED ON THIS PLAT ARE PAID FULL. DATED THIS _____ DAY OF _________________, A.D., 20__. BY:_________________________________ TREASURER OF GARFIELD COUNTY TITLE CERTIFICATE I, ___________________________________, AN ATTORNEY LICENSED TO PRACTICE LAW IN THE STATE OFCOLORADO, OR AGENT AUTHORIZED BY A TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY, DO HEREBY CERTIFY THAT I HAVEEXAMINED THE TITLE TO ALL LANDS SHOWN UPON THIS PLAT AND THAT TITLE TO SUCH LANDS IS VESTED INBERKELEY FAMILY LIMITED PARTNERSHIP, FREE AND CLEAR OF ALL LIENS AND ENCUMBRANCES (INCLUDINGMORTGAGES, DEEDS OF TRUST, JUDGMENTS, EASEMENTS, CONTRACTS AND AGREEMENTS OF RECORDAFFECTING THE REAL PROPERTY IN THIS PLAT), EXCEPTAS FOLLOWS:____________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________. DATED THIS_______DAY OF_____________, A.D., 20__. TITLE COMPANY: ____________________________________ ____________________________________AGENT OR BY:________________________________________ ATTORNEY COLORADO ATTORNEY REGISTRATION NO.___________ WV ELECTRICAL TRANSFORMER SANITARY CLEAN-OUT WATER VALVE TELEPHONE PEDESTAL ELECTRIC PEDESTAL SET NO. 5 REBAR & CAP L.S. NO. 38215 CATV PEDESTAL FOUND PROPERTY CORNER AS DESCRIBED DYH OSW GV S D W UTILITY POLE/POWER POLE GUY ANCHOR TELEPHONE VAULT ELECTRICAL VAULT LIGHT POLE STREET SIGN HANDICAP PARKING DECIDUOUS TREE CONIFEROUS TREE FIRE HYDRANT WATER SHUTOFF GAS VALVE SANITARY MANHOLE STORM SEWER MANHOLE ELECTRIC MANHOLE WELL 1/16 AND SMALLER, TRACT, HES, MS COR. SECTION CORNER 1/4 OR 1/16 COR. CENTER 1/4 COR WATER MANHOLE E T WATER METER GAS METER ELECTRICAL METER G TELEPHONE MANHOLET ELECTRIC MARKER GAS MARKER ELECTRICAL OUTLET LANDSCAPE LIGHT IRRIGATION VALVE BOX G W IVB DRY WELL VICINITY MAP TELEPHONE WATER W SANITARY - STORM CURB INLET CATCH BASIN GAS ELECTRIC E E E SIGNS TREES BUSH DECIDUOUS TREE PROPERTY MARKERS SATELLITE DISH FLAG POLE IMPROVEMENT LOCATION CERTIFICATE I HEREBY STATE THAT THIS IMPROVEMENT LOCATION CERTIFICATE WAS PREPARED BY TRUE NORTH COLORADO, LLC FOR _______________________, THAT IT IS NOT A LAND SURVEY PLAT OR AN IMPROVEMENT SURVEY PLAT, AND THAT IT IS NOT TO BE RELIED UPON FOR THE ESTABLISHMENT OF FENCE, BUILDING, OR OTHER FUTURE IMPROVEMENT LINES. I FURTHER STATE THAT THE IMPROVEMENTS ON THE ABOVE DESCRIBED PARCEL ON THIS DATE OF __________________, 20__, EXCEPT UTILITY CONNECTIONS, ARE ENTIRELY WITHIN THE BOUNDARIES OF THE PARCEL, EXCEPT AS SHOWN, THAT THERE ARE NO ENCROACHMENTS UPON THE DESCRIBED PREMISES BY IMPROVEMENTS ON ANY ADJOINING PREMISES, EXCEPT AS INDICATED, AND THAT THERE IS NO APPARENT EVIDENCE OR SIGN OF ANY EASEMENT CROSSING OR BURDENING ANY PART OF SAID PARCEL, EXCEPT AS NOTED. RODNEY P. KISER, PLS 38215 COLORADO PROFESSIONAL SURVEYOR COUNTY SURVEYOR'S CERTIFICATE APPROVED FOR CONTENT AND FORM ONLY AND NOT THE ACCURACY OF SURVEYS, CALCULATIONS AND DRAFTING PURSUANT TO C.R.S., 38-51-101 AND 102, ET SEQ. DATED THIS _____ DAY OF ______________, 20__. BY:___________________________________ GARFIELD COUNTY SURVEYOR WATER LINE SEWER LINE TELEPHONE LINE FIBER OPTIC LINE GAS LINE OVERHEAD ELECTRIC LINE SILT FENCE LINE FENCE LINE CATV LINE UTILITY LINES ORF REV I E W PRELIMINARY FLOOD ZONE STATEMENT A PORTION OF THIS PROPERTY LIES WITH FLOOD ZONE A ACCORDING TO FEMA FLOOD INSURANCE RATE MAP COMMUNITY PANEL NO. 08097C0066 C, HAVING AN EFFECTIVE DATE OF JUNE 4, 1987, THE STRUCTURE, HOWEVER LIES OUTSIDE OF SAID FLOOD ZONE A AS SHOWN HEREON. LAND SURVEY DEPOSIT MESA COUNTY SURVEYOR'S OFFICE DATE:__________________________ BOOK NO:_________, PAGE:_________ DEPOSIT NO:______________________ AS-BUILT SURVEY CERTIFICATION STATEMENT "I, THE UNDERSIGNED REGISTERED LAND SURVEYOR, HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THE ELEVATIONS, GRADING AND DRAINAGE FEATURES SHOWN OF THE PROPERTY DESCRIBED AS XXXXXXXXXXX WERE DEVELOPED FROM SURVEYING THE PROPERTY ON THE DATE OF:XXXXXXXXXXXXX AND ACCURATELY DEPICT THE ELEVATIONS EXISTING DURING THE SURVEY. THE ELEVATIONS MAY CHANGE SUBSEQUENT TO THE SURVEY DUE TO SUBSIDENCE, UPHEAVAL, EROSION, ACTS OF MAN OR OTHER FACTORS. THEREFORE, THIS CERTIFICATE MAY NOT ACCURATELY DEPICT ELEVATIONS, GRADING AND DRAINAGE PATTERN AFTER THE DATE OF THE SURVEY. EASEMENTS ARE SHOWN PER THE PLAT UNLESS NOTED OTHERWISE. NO PART OF THIS LIES WITHIN THE 100-YEAR FLOODPLAIN AS DEFINED BY FEMA, EXCEPT AS NOTED." RODNEY P. KISER, PLS 38215 FOR AND BEHALF OF:XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX. CLERK AND RECORDER'S CERTIFICATE THIS ACTIVITY ENVELOPE AND SITE PLAN HAS BEEN ACCEPTED FOR RECORDING IN THE OFFICE OF THE CLERK AND RECORDER OF PITKIN COUNTY, COLORADO THIS ____ DAY OF __________, 2015, PLAT BOOK _____, PAGE ______, AS RECEPTION NO.________________. ______________________________________ CLERK AND RECORDER BY:____________________________________ DEPUTY PITKIN COUNTY COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DIRECTOR'S APPROVAL THIS ACTIVITY ENVELOPE AND SITE PLAN HAS BEEN REVIEWED AND APPROVED BY THE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DIRECTOR OF PITKIN COUNTY THIS _____ DAY OF ______, 2015 AND HAS BEEN PREPARED PURSUANT TO ADMINISTRATIVE DECISION NO. ________, RECORDED AS RECEPTION NO. ___________. _______________________________________ CINDY HOUBEN - COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DIRECTOR OWNER'S ACKNOWLEDGMENT THE OWNER ACKNOWLEDGES BEING INFORMED BY PITKIN COUNTY OF THE EXISTENCE OF "ENVIRONMENTAL HAZARD AREAS" THAT MIGHT AFFECT THE PROPERTY, ANY IMPROVEMENTS, AND THE USE THEREOF. THEN PROVISIONS OF THE PITKIN COUNTY REGULATIONS DO NOT IN ANY WAY ASSURE OR IMPLY THAT THE AREAS OUTSIDE OF DESIGNATED HAZARD AREAS WILL BE FREE FROM HAZARDS OR THAT APPROVED MITIGATION MEASURES WILL GUARANTEE THE SAFETY OF THE PROPERTY. (OWNER) BY:_______________________________________ OWNER'S CERTIFICATE KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS, THAT ____________, BEING THE OWNER(s) IN FEE SIMPLE OF THE LANDS SHOWN HEREON AND DOES HEREBY ESTABLISH THE SITE PLAN SET FORTH HEREON. (OWNER) BY: ____________________________ ROCK WALL CO DW UNDERGROUND ELECTRIC LINE TOPOGRAPHIC SURVEYEXISTING CONDITIONS SURVEYALTA/NSPS LAND TITLE SURVEY CITY OF ASPEN SURVEYOR'S CERTIFICATION I, RODNEY P. KISER, HEREBY CERTIFY TO XXXXXXXXXX, THAT THIS IS AN "IMPROVEMENT SURVEY PLAT" AS DEFINED BY C.R.S.38-51-102(9) AND THAT IT IS A MONUMENTED LAND SURVEY SHOWING THE LOCATION OF ALL STRUCTURES, VISIBLE UTILITIES, FENCES, HEDGES, OR WALLS SITUATED ON THE DESCRIBED PARCEL AND WITHIN FIVE FEET OF ALL BOUNDARIES OF SUCH PARCEL, ANY CONFLICTING BOUNDARY EVIDENCE OR VISIBLE ENCROACHMENTS, AND ALL EASEMENTS, UNDERGROUND UTILITIES, AND TUNNELS DESCRIBED IN THE TITLE COMPANY'S COMMITMENT FOR TITLE INSURANCE ORDER NO. 01330-73339, OR OTHER SOURCES AS SPECIFIED ON THE IMPROVEMENT SURVEY PLAT. RODNEY P. KISER, PLS NO. 38215 COLORADO PROFESSIONAL LAND SURVEYOR NOTES: BASIS OF BEARINGS FOR THIS SURVEY IS A BEARING OF S26°12'00"E ALONG THE EASTERLY PROPERTY LINEBETWEEN THE NORTHEAST CORNER A FOUND ALUMINUM CAP LS17664 AND THE SOUTHEAST CORNER A SETREBAR AND YELLOW PLASTIC CAP LS38215 AS SHOWN HEREON. BASIS OF BEARING FOR THIS SURVEY ARE BASED ON TRUE NORTH FROM GPS OBSERVATIONS YIELDING ABEARING OF XXXXXXXXX. DATE OF FIELD SURVEY: JANUARY 28 2016, AT THE TIME OF THE SURVEY THERE WAS 2-4 FEET OF SNOW ONTHE GROUND. LINEAR UNITS USED TO PERFORM THIS SURVEY WERE U.S. SURVEY FEET. THIS SURVEY IS BASED ON THE DIVIDE RECORDED AUGUST 28, 1989 IN PLAT BOOK 23 AT PAGE 27 ANDCORNERS FOUND IN PLACE AS SHOWN HEREON. THIS IMPROVEMENT SURVEY PLAT DOES NOT CONSTITUTE A TITLE SEARCH BY TRUE NORTH COLORADO, LLCFOR ALL INFORMATION REGARDING EASEMENT, RIGHTS-OF-WAY AND/OR TITLE OF RECORD, TRUE NORTHCOLORADO, LLC. RELIED UPON TITLE COMMITMENT NO. XXXXXXXXXXXX ISSUED BY XXXXXXXXXXXXX,EFFECTIVE DATE: XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX THIS PROPERTY IS SUBJECT TO RESERVATIONS, RESTRICTIONS, COVENANTS AND EASEMENTS OF RECORDOR IN PLACE. THIS SURVEY WAS PREPARED WITHOUT THE BENEFIT OF A TITLE COMMITMENT, THEREFORE, ANYEXCEPTIONS TO TITLE THAT MAY AFFECT THE SUBJECT PROPERTY HAVE NOT BEEN RESEARCHED BY TRUENORTH COLORADO, LLC. ELEVATIONS SHOWN HEREON ARE BASED ON NORTH AMERICAN VERTICAL DATUM OF 1988 (NAVD 88)REFERENCED FROM NATIONAL GEODETIC SURVEY (NGS) BENCHMARK STATION S 159 HAVING AN ELEVATIONOF 7720.88. ELEVATIONS SHOWN HEREON ARE BASED ON GPS OBSERVATIONS UTILIZING THE CONTINUOUS OPERATINGREFERENCE STATIONS (CORS) THROUGH THE MESA COUNTY RTVRN NETWORK BROAD CASTING NORTHAMERICAN VERTICAL DATUM (NAVD88) YIELDING AN ON-SITE ELEVATION OF XXXXXX ELEVATIONS SHOWN HEREON WERE DERIVED FROM GPS OBSERVATIONS ON XX-XX-XXXX AND ARE BASEDON NORTH AMERICAN VERTICAL DATUM OF 1988 (NAVD88) WHICH DATA WAS OBTAINED FROM THE NATIONALGEODETIC SURVEY ONLINE POSITIONING USER SERVICE (OPUS). CONTOUR INTERVAL EQUALS 1 FOOT. UNDERGROUND UTILITIES HAVE BEEN MARKED OUT BY OTHERS, ONLY PAINT MARKS AND UTILITY FLAGSHAVE BEEN LOCATED BY TRUE NORTH COLORADO, LLC. THE ACTUAL LOCATION OF UNDERGROUND UTILITIESMUST BE FIELD VERIFIED PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION. SLOPES SHOWN HEREON ARE BASED ON TOPOGRAPHIC SURVEY DATA COLLECTED IN THE FIELD ON APRIL 25& 26, 2018 WHICH HAS BEEN CLASSIFIED INTO SLOPES OF 30% TO 40% AND AREAS WITH SLOPES GREATERTHAN 40% USING A COMPUTER ANALYSIS MEASURED BETWEEN EACH CONTOUR INTERVAL. UNDERGROUND UTILITIES SHOWN HEREON (GAS, ELECTRIC, CATV & TELEPHONE) WERE LOCATED BYROARING FORK UTILITY LOCATORS LLC. WATER & SEWER SERVICES WERE TAKEN FROM THE RECORDEDPLAT OF MOSES LOT SPLIT. UTILITIES SHOWN HEREON ARE FOR PLANNING PURPOSES ONLY. PLEASE CALL811 PRIOR TO ANY DIGGING OR EARTHWORK CONSTRUCTION FOR UTILITY VERIFICATION. SURVEYOR'S STATEMENT (LAND SURVEY PLAT) I, RODNEY P. KISER, DO HEREBY STATE THAT THIS SURVEY WAS PREPARED BY TRUE NORTH COLORADO, LLC FOR ______________________________________, THAT SAID FIELD SURVEY WAS PERFORMED UNDER MY SUPERVISION AND RESPONSIBLE CHARGE AND THAT THIS SURVEY MEETS THE REQUIREMENTS OF A LAND SURVEY PLAT AS SET FORTH IN C.R.S. SECTION 38-51-106 AND IS TRUE AND CORRECT TO THE BEST OF MY BELIEF AND KNOWLEDGE. RODNEY P. KISER, PLS 38215 COLORADO PROFESSIONAL LAND SURVEYOR TELEPHONE PEDESTAL GAS METER ELECTRICAL METER G LEGEND E SURVEYOR'S CERTIFICATION I, RODNEY P. KISER, HEREBY CERTIFY TO HENRY LAMBERT & CAREY BOND THAT THIS IS AN "IMPROVEMENT SURVEY PLAT" AS DEFINED BY C.R.S.38-51-102(9) AND THAT IT IS A MONUMENTED LAND SURVEY PERFORMED UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION AND RESPONSIBLE CHARGE SHOWING THE LOCATION OF ALL STRUCTURES, VISIBLE UTILITIES, FENCES, HEDGES, OR WALLS SITUATED ON THE DESCRIBED PARCEL AND WITHIN FIVE FEET OF ALL BOUNDARIES OF SUCH PARCEL, ANY CONFLICTING BOUNDARY EVIDENCE OR VISIBLE ENCROACHMENTS, AND ALL EASEMENTS, UNDERGROUND UTILITIES, AND TUNNELS DESCRIBED IN THE ATTORNEYS TITLE INSURANCE AGENCY OF ASPEN, LLC COMMITMENT FOR TITLE INSURANCE COMMITMENT NO. 18003943, OR OTHER SOURCES AS SPECIFIED ON THE IMPROVEMENT SURVEY PLAT. LINEAR ERROR OF CLOSURE IS LEES THAN 1:15,000. RODNEY P. KISER LICENSED PROFESSIONAL LAND SURVEYOR COLORADO REGISTRATION NO. 38215 SURVEY NOTES: 1. BASIS OF BEARINGS FOR THIS SURVEY IS A BEARING OF N75°09'11"W BETWEEN A FOUND NO. 5 REBARS AS SHOWN HEREON. 2. DATE OF FIELD SURVEY: JANUARY 15, 2019 AND JANUARY 25, 2019. AT THE TIME OF THE FIELD SURVEYTHERE WAS 4"+ OF SNOW ON THE GROUND. 3. LINEAR UNITS USED TO PERFORM THIS SURVEY WERE U.S. SURVEY FEET. 4. THIS SURVEY IS BASED ON THE OFFICIAL MAP OF THE CITY OF ASPEN DATED DECEMBER 18, 1959 AS RECEPTION NO. 109043, THE PLAT OF RESUBDIVIDED LOTS K, L, M, N, O, BLOCK 46 RECORDED JANUARY 15, 1982 IN PLAT BOOK 12 AT PAGE 54 AND CORNERS FOUND IN PLACE AS SHOWN HEREON. 5. THIS IMPROVEMENT SURVEY PLAT DOES NOT CONSTITUTE A TITLE SEARCH BY TRUE NORTH COLORADO, LLC, FOR ALL INFORMATION REGARDING EASEMENT, RIGHTS-OF-WAY AND/OR TITLE OF RECORD, TRUE NORTH COLORADO, LLC. RELIED UPON TITLE COMMITMENT NO. 18003943 ISSUED BY ATTORNEYS TITLE INSURANCE AGENCY OF ASPEN, LLC, EFFECTIVE DATE: JANUARY 22, 2019. 6. BEARINGS AND DISTANCES SHOWN HEREON ARE BASED ON FIELD MEASUREMENTS. BEARINGS ANDDISTANCES SHOWN IN PARENTHESIS ARE OF RECORD SHOWN ON THE OFFICIAL MAP OF THE CITY OF ASPEN DATED NOVEMBER 16, 1959. 7. THE SUBJECT PROPERTY LIES WITHIN FLOOD ZONE X WHICH ARE AREAS DETERMINED TO BE OUTSIDE THE 500-YEAR FLOOD PLAIN) ACCORDING TO FEMA FLOOD INSURANCE RATE MAP COMMUNITY PANEL NO. 08097C0203C WITH AN EFFECTIVE DATE OF JUNE 4, 1987. 8. THERE ARE NO NATURAL HAZARDS THAT EXIST ON THE SUBJECT PROPERTY. 9. NATURAL SLOPES ARE BETWEEN 0% TO 15% OVER THE ENTIRE SITE. 10. BASED ON 1958 CITY OF ASPEN TOPOGRAPHY THE SUBJECT PROPERTY DOES NOT APPEAR TO BE MANIPULATED FROM HISTORIC GRADE. LOTS P & Q - BLOCK 46, CITY AND TOWNSITE OF ASPEN SECTION 12, TOWNSHIP 10 SOUTH, RANGE 85 WEST OF THE 6TH PMCOUNTY OF PITKIN, STATE OF COLORADO IMPROVEMENT & TOPOGRAPHICSURVEY PLAT YEARS FROM THE DATE OF CERTIFICATION SHOWN HEREON. AFTER YOU FIRST DISCOVER SUCH DEFECT. IN NO EVENT MAY ANY ACTION ACTION BASED UPON ANY DEFECT IN THIS SURVEY WITHIN THREE YEARS BASED UPON ANY DEFECT IN THIS SURVEY BE COMMENCED MORE THAN TEN NOTICE: ACCORDING TO COLORADO LAW YOU MUST COMMENCE ANY LEGAL TRUE NORTH COLORADO LLC. A LAND SURVEYING AND MAPPING COMPANY PO BOX 614 - 529 S. WILD HORSE DRIVE NEW CASTLE, COLORADO 81647 (970) 984-0474 www.truenorthcolorado.com PROJECT NO: 2019-115 DATE: FEBRUARY 1, 2019 DRAWN RPK SURVEYED LDV SHEET 1 OF 1 TRUE NORTH COLORADO A LAND SURVEYING AND MAPPING COMPANY HENRY LAMBERT & CAREY BOND IMPROVEMENT & TOPOGRAPHIC SURVEY PLAT LOTS P & Q - BLOCK 46 CITY OF ASPEN COUNTY OF PITKIN - STATE OF COLORADO 8'4'16' SCALE: 1" = 8' N PROPERTY DESCRIPTION: LOTS P AND Q, BLOCK 46, CITY AND TOWNSITE OF ASPEN. COUNTY OF PITKIN STATE OF COLORADO 0 ACCESS & UTILITY EASEMENT SECTION 22, TOWNSHIP 9 SOUTH,RANGE 86 WEST OF THE 6TH P.M.COUNTY OF PITKIN, STATE OF COLORADO ACCESS & UTILITY EASEMENT A STRIP OF LAND SITUATED IN SECTION 22, TOWNSHIP 9 SOUTH, RANGE 86 WEST OF THE SIXTH PRINCIPAL MERIDIAN, COUNTY OF PITKIN, STATE OF COLORADO; SAID STRIP OF LAND LYING TEN FEET (10') ON EACH SIDE OF THE FOLLOWING DESCRIBED CENTERLINE: COMMENCING AT THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF SAID SECTION 22; THENCE N56°56'19"E A DISTANCE OF 2145.08 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING; THENCE ALONG SAID CENTERLINE THE FOLLOWING THREE (3) COURSES: 1.) S89°17'34"W A DISTANCE OF 44.87 FEET; 2.) S62°48'55"W A DISTANCE OF 22.45 FEET; 3.) S45°23'26"W A DISTANCE OF 76.76 FEET TO THE POINT OF TERMINUS; (WHENCE THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF SAID SECTION 22 BEARS: S56°37'35"W A DISTANCE OF 2009.67 FEET); SAID STRIP OF LAND CONTAINS 2,878 SQUARE FEET MORE OR LESS. PROJECT NO: 2017-160 DATE: JULY 13, 2017 DRAWN RPK SURVEYED LDV SHEET 1 OF 1 V. HAWLEY SMITH SECTION 22, TOWNSHIP 9 SOUTH, RANGE 86 WEST OF 6TH P.M. COUNTY OF PITKIN, STATE OF COLORADOTRUENORTH COLORADO A LAND SURVEYING AND MAPPING COMPANY SCALE: 1" = 30' N ACCESS & UTILITY EASEMENTA STRIP OF LAND SITUATED IN SECTION 22, TOWNSHIP 9 SOUTH, RANGE 86 WEST OF THE SIXTH PRINCIPAL MERIDIAN, COUNTY OFPITKIN, STATE OF COLORADO; SAID STRIP OF LAND LYING TEN FEET (10') ON EACH SIDE OF THE FOLLOWING DESCRIBEDCENTERLINE:COMMENCING AT THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF SAID SECTION 22; THENCE N56°56'19"E A DISTANCE OF 2145.08 FEET TO THE POINTOF BEGINNING; THENCE ALONG SAID CENTERLINE THE FOLLOWING THREE (3) COURSES:1.) S89°17'34"W A DISTANCE OF 44.87 FEET;2.) S62°48'55"W A DISTANCE OF 22.45 FEET;3.) S45°23'26"W A DISTANCE OF 76.76 FEET TO THE POINT OF TERMINUS; (WHENCE THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF SAID SECTION 22BEARS: S56°37'35"W A DISTANCE OF 2009.67 FEET); SAID STRIP OF LAND CONTAINS 2,878 SQUARE FEET MORE OR LESS.PROJECT NO: 2017-160DATE: JULY 13, 2017 DRAWNRPKSURVEYEDLDV SHEET1 OF 1V. HAWLEY SMITHSECTION 22, TOWNSHIP 9 SOUTH, RANGE 86 WEST OF 6TH P.M.COUNTY OF PITKIN, STATE OF COLORADOTRUENORTHCOLORADOA LAND SURVEYING AND MAPPING COMPANY PROJECT NO: 2017-104 DATE: December 13, 2017 TRUE NORTH COLORADO A LAND SURVEYING AND MAPPING COMPANY DRAWING NO. TITLE IMPROVEMENT & TOPOGRAPHIC SURVEY V-1 DATE REVISION GUNNISON COUNTY CLERK AND RECORDER'S ACCEPTANCE THIS SURVEY WAS ACCEPTED FOR DEPOSIT IN THE OFFICE OF THE CLERK AND RECORDER OF GUNNISON COUNTY, COLORADO ON THIS DAY OF __________________________________, 2018, DEPOSIT NUMBER______________________________. TIME:_________________________________________, DATE:_____________________________. ______________________________________________________________________________ GUNNISON COUNTY CLERK AND RECORDER EAGLE COUNTY SURVEYOR'S CERTIFICATE DEPOSITED THIS _____ DAY OF ____________________, 2018, AT _________.M. IN BOOK _____ OF THE EAGLE COUNTY SURVEYOR'S LAND SURVEY PLATS/RIGHTS-OF-WAY SURVEYS AT PAGE ________. THIS LAND SURVEY PLAT COMPLIES WITH SECTION 38-51-106(1), OF THE COLORADO REVISED STATUTES. ____________________________________________________________________________________ COUNTY SURVEYOR BILL SURVEYOR'S NOTES 1. THIS SURVEY DOES NOT CONSTITUTE A TITLE SEARCH BY THIS SURVEYOR OF THE PROPERTY SHOWN AND DESCRIBED HEREON TO DETERMINE: A. OWNERSHIP OF THE TRACT OF LAND B. COMPATIBILITY OF THIS DESCRIPTION WITH THOSE OF ADJOINERS C. RIGHT'S-OF WAY, EASEMENTS AND ENCUMBRANCES OF RECORD AFFECTING THIS PARCEL. 6. THIS ALTA/ACSM LAND TITLE SURVEY DOES NOT CONSTITUTE A TITLE SEARCH BY HIGH COUNTRY ENGINEERING, INC. FOR ALL INFORMATION REGARDING EASEMENTS, RIGHTS 0F WAY AND/OR TITLE OF RECORD, HIGH COUNTRY ENGINEERING, INC. RELIED UPON TITLE COMMITMENT PCT25114W4 ISSUED BY WESTCOR LAND TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY, EFFECTIVE NOVEMBER 16, 2017. 7. ANY PERSON WHO KNOWINGLY REMOVES, ALTERS OR DEFACES ANY PUBLIC LAND SURVEY MONUMENT OR LAND BOUNDARY MONUMENT OR ACCESSORY COMMITS A CLASS TWO (2) MISDEMEANOR PURSUANT TO SECTION 18-4-508 OF THE COLORADO REVISED STATUTES. 8. ALL DIMENSIONS AND COURSES ARE AS MEASURED IN THE FIELD UNLESS DENOTED IN PARENTHESIS, WHICH DENOTE THE BOUNDARIES OF RECORD ON THE ORIGINAL PLAT OF THE FIRST AMENDED SUBDIVISION EXEMPTION PLAT AND 1041 HAZARD REVIEW SITE PLAN OF CHAPARRAL ASPEN RECORDED OCTOBER 15, 2002 IN PLAT BOOK 62 AT PAGE 101 AS RECEPTION NO. 473441, AN IMPROVEMENT SURVEY PREPARED BY HIGH COUNTRY ENGINEERING, INC. DATED NOVEMBER 13, 2006 AND CORNERS FOUND IN PLACE AS SHOWN. COUNTY, STATE OF COLORADO. 9. THE WORD "CERTIFY" AS SHOWN AND USED HEREON MEANS AN EXPRESSION OF PROFESSIONAL OPINION REGARDING THE FACTS OF THE SURVEY, AS BASED UPON THE EVIDENCE PRESENTED HEREON, AND DOES NOT CONSTITUTE A WARRANTY OR GUARANTEE, EXPRESSED OR IMPLIED. 10. NOTICE: THIS PLAT AND THE INFORMATION SHOWN HEREON MAY NOT BE USED FOR ANY ADDITIONAL OR EXTENDED PURPOSE BEYOND THAT FOR WHICH IT WAS INTENDED AND MAY NOT BE USED BY ANY PARTIES OTHER THAN THOSE TO WHICH IT IS CERTIFIED. THIS DOCUMENT AND THE WORK IT REPRESENTS IS THE PROPERTY OF HIGH COUNTRY ENGINEERING, INC. NO PART OF THIS DOCUMENT MAY BE STORED, REPRODUCED, DISTRIBUTED OR USED TO PREPARE DERIVATIVE PRODUCTS WITHOUT PRIOR WRITTEN PERMISSION. AN ORIGINAL SEAL AND ORIGINAL SIGNATURE IS REQUIRED TO VALIDATE THIS DOCUMENT AND IS EXCLUSIVE TO HIGH COUNTRY ENGINEERING, INC. AND THE OWNER(S) OF RECORD AS OF THIS DATE, OF THE PROPERTY DELINEATED HEREON AND THE SUBJECT OF THE SURVEY. A LAND SURVEYING AND MAPPING COMPANY PO BOX 614 - 529 S. WILD HORSE DRIVE NEW CASTLE, COLORADO 81647 (970) 984-0474 www.truenorthcolorado.com TRUE NORTH COLORADO LLC. A LAND SURVEYING AND MAPPING COMPANY PO BOX 614 - 529 S. WILD HORSE DRIVE NEW CASTLE, COLORADO 81647 (970) 984-0474 www.truenorthcolorado.com TRUE NORTH COLORADO LLC.A LAND SURVEYING AND MAPPING COMPANYPO BOX 614 - 529 S. WILD HORSE DRIVENEW CASTLE, COLORADO 81647(970) 984-0474www.truenorthcolorado.com SCHEDULE B PART II TITLE EXCEPTIONS: EXCEPTIONS 1 THROUGH 9 ARE STANDARD TITLE EXCEPTIONS. 10.) THIS PROPERTY IS SUBJECT TO EXCEPTIONS AND RESERVATIONS AS SET FORTH IN THE ACT AUTHORIZING THE ISSUANCE OF THE PATENT FOR THE CITY AND TOWNSITE OF ASPEN, DATED JANUARY 29, 1897 AND RECORDED MARCH 1, 1897 IN BOOK 139 AT PAGE 216 AS RECEPTION NO. 060156. 11.) THIS PROPERTY IS SUBJECT TO TERMS, CONDITIONS, PROVISIONS, AGREEMENTS AND OBLIGATIONS SPECIFIED UNDER AN ORDINANCE ACCEPTING A MAP ENTITLED "OFFICIAL MAP OF THE CITY OF ASPEN, PITKIN COUNTY, STATE OF COLORADO," AS THE OFFICIAL MAP OF THE CITY OF ASPEN: PROVIDING FOR DEDICATION OF ALL STREETS AND ALLEYS, EXCEPT SUCH STREETS AND ALLEYS HERETOFORE VACATED: AND PROVIDING FOR THE FILING OF SAID MAP, FIELD NOTES, AND SUPPLEMENTAL PLATS WITH THE CLERK AND RECORDER FOR PITKIN COUNTY (ORDINANCE NO. 6, SERIES OF 1959) DATED NOVEMBER 16, 1959, AND RECORDED DECEMBER 18, 1959, AS RECEPTION NO. 109043. 12.) THIS PROPERTY IS SUBJECT TO TERMS, CONDITIONS, PROVISIONS, AGREEMENTS AND OBLIGATIONS SPECIFIED UNDER ORDINANCE NO. 45 (SERIES OF 2006) RECORDED MARCH 28, 2007, AS RECEPTION NO. 535861. HISTORIC DESIGNATION. 13.) DRIVEWAY ENCROACHMENT, ENCROACHMENT OF WOOD RETAINING WALLS AND ENCROACHMENT OF RAILROAD TIE WALL, AS SHOWN ON THE IMPROVEMENT SURVEY PLAT, PROVIDED BY TRUE NORTH COLORADO, DATED JANUARY 18, 2019 AS PROJECT NO. 2019-104. 14.) THIS PROPERTY IS SUBJECT TO ANY EXISTING LEASES OR TENANCIES, AND ANY AND ALL PARTIES CLAIMING BY, THROUGH OR UNDER SAID LESSEES. TREE TYPE SIZE DRIP TREE CHART 1 2 30"40' 16"32' CONIFEROUS CONIFEROUS 3 22"32'CONIFEROUS 4 20"30' 5 6 6"12' 7 8" 8 16'9 10 40"40'CONIFEROUS11 12 ASPEN 13 ASPEN 14 ASPEN 15 ASPEN 16 SCALE: 1" = 500' 16"32'ASPEN CONIFEROUS 24"30'CONIFEROUS ASPEN ASPEN ASPEN 16' 16' 8" 8"ASPEN 16"32'ASPEN 8"16' 6"12' 8"16' 8"16' ZONING: CITY OF ASPEN LAND USE CODE: R-6 SETBACKS FRONT YARD: PRINCIPAL BUILDINGS: 10 FEET ACCESSORY BUILDINGS: 15 FEET REAR YARD: PRINCIPAL BUILDINGS: 10 FEET PRINCIPAL BUILDING USED SOLELY AS GARAGE: 5 FEET ACCESSORY BUILDINGS: 5 FEET SIDE YARD: MINIMUM: 5 FEET 10 FEET, PLUS 1 FOOT FOR EACH ADDITIONAL 300 SQUARE FEET OF GROSS LOT AREA, TO A MAXIMUM OF 15 FEET OF TOTAL SIDE YARD W. HY M A N A V E N U E W. HOP K I N S A V E N U E MAIN S T R E E T3RD STREET2ND STREET1ST STREETSITE N N SCALE: 1/8" = 1'-0" 1 Architectural Site Plan A101 2 02 SURVEY 24X36 _ Layout A101 • HPC Granted a 7.4' combined side yard set back at Final 2022 • Requesting 5.4' Combined side yard setback at Susbtantial 2023 (East @ 2.4 + West @ 3). Change requested given new plumb retaining wall @ St Moritz at 2' from the property line (leaving 5' between the 6' retaining wall and the single story garage). HPC is the decision making body for the variance. Path lighting exists in the rear of the chalet. The monument has been removed. Two path lights in the front of the chalet (on the 3' path) as per L.2.002. Cut sheet are on L.2.002. Narrowed entry path to 3'-0" Landscape, Civil & Architectural show 2x 2 strips (gravel fines) with grass in between 27 March 2023 SHEET TITLE INTEGRATED DESIGN TEAM PROJECT NO: MODEL FILE: DRAWN BY: COPYRIGHT: SHEET 41 A101 Jeffrey H Woodruff 312_W_Hyman_04052023.pln Project No. 116 /Users/jeffrey/Documents/Cloud Hill/312 West Hyman/312_W_Hyman_04052023.plnPowder Day Skiiing, LLC, David A Tarrab Mees Architectural Site Plan 312 W Hyman Ave 312 W Hyman Ave Lots P+Q, Block 46 Aspen CO 81611 USA/ Pitkin County UGB, City of Aspen 312 W Hyman Ave Aspen CO 81611 USA Account # R000145 Parcel ID # 273512464006 Landscape Architect Jennifer M. Dolecki-Smith, RLA Escape Garden Design, LLC Civil Grading and Drainage Jay Engstrom, P.E. Crystal River Civil, LLC Structural Engineer Brian Rossiter, P.E. bwr.pe Contractor COA- HPO Site Visit08/22/21 Jeffrey H. Woodruff AIA, LEED AP Cloud Hill Design, LLC Snowmass CO 81654 USA COA- HPC Conceptual02/26/22 COA- HPC Conceptual04/27/22 COA- HPC Final07/27/22 COA- City Council Call Up10/12/22 COA- HPC Final04/12/23 1,227 sq ft 38 sq ft A A B B C C D D E E 4 4 3 3 2 2 1 1 1.55 5 ' 2.40 6 ' 11.6 8 ' 5.00 1 ' 3'-0" 2'18.24'14.414'314.25 sq ft 28.5 sq ft Proposed fence at the 5' side setback and 5' rear setback, lined on the South with shrubs, see landscaping plan St Moritz R e t a i n i n g w a l l ( n e w , plum and 2 ' f r o m p r o p e r t y l i n e ) , approx. 6' h i g h Removal of T r e e # 2 Removal of T r e e # 1 Existing dry well With new p l u m r e t a i n i n g w a l l , structure is 7 . 0 0 1 ' f r o m t h e nearest str u c t u r e 8" CMU w a l l , d e s i g n U 9 0 4 , exceeds 1 h r f i r e r a t i n g , f u l l y grouted bel o w g r a d e , a s p e r struct. Requesting c o m b i n e d 5 . 4 ' Setback as p e r n e w p l u m b 6 ' concrete w a l l . Railroad ties removed, gravel removed from apparent encroachment sod shown for revised driveway illustration, see landscape and civil for full site planting (showing reduction in gravel). E EG OS W1 2 3 4 5 678 9 10 11 121314 15 16790479037902 7901 7901 7902 790179 0 2 7902 790379 0 3 7 9 0 4 10' R E A R S E T B A C K - P R I N C I P A L B U I L D I N G 5' R E A R S E T B A C K - P R I N C I P A L B U I L D I N G U S E D A S G A R A G E & AC C E S S O R Y B U I L D I N G 5' MINIMUM SIDE SETBACK10' F R O N T S E T B A C K PRI N C I P A L B U I L D I N G 15' F R O N T S E T B A C K ACC E S S O R Y B U I L D I N G 312 West Hyman Garage F.F.E. = 7902.86 312 West Hyman "Bedroom" F.F.E. = 7901.31 F.F.E. = 7901.36' F.F.E. = 7901.36' F.F.E. = 7901.33' mech. #1, 38 sq. ft./ #2, hw, ws 5' side 42" w x 51" h x 17" deep cshp/12" AFF rack mounted, with architectural louvers sod, see landscapegravel,parking #2M I (S75 ° 1 1 ' 0 9 " E 6 0 . 0 0 ' ) S7 5 ° 1 4 ' 5 8 " E 5 8 . 5 9 ' E E G (N14°50'49"E 100.00') N15°05'12"E99.90' S14°50'49"W 100.00'N75 ° 0 9 ' 1 1 " W 6 0 . 0 0 ' BAS I S O F B E A R I N G S FOUND N O . 5 R E B A R FOUND N O . 5 R E B A R FOUND N O . 5 R E B A R SITE BEN C H M A R K SET FOUN D N O . 5 R E B A R & 1-1/4" ORA N G E P L A S T I C C A P PROP CO R N E R T N C P L S 3 8 2 1 5 ELEVATIO N : 7 9 0 0 . 8 4 (20. 9 0 ' W I D E ) GR A V E L A L L E Y ALL E Y BL O C K 4 6 LO T P LO T Q LO T O LO T N LO T R LO T S W. H Y M A N A V E N U E (74. 8 0 ' W I D E P U B L I C ) SE CORN E R BLOCK 46 FOUND R E B A R & 1 - 1 / 2 " ALUMINU M C A P (NO STAM P I N G ) N75 ° 0 9 ' 1 1 " W 5 9 . 9 2 ' (60. 0 0 ' ) 33.4' 4.0' 4.9' 8.3' 5.5' 11.5'0.7' 0.7'2.2'0.8' 0.7' 0.7'0.8'2.2'9.2'0.8'0.8'38.4'21.2'7.2'11.1 ' ( T I E )19.8'(TIE)0.8'2.4' (TIE )13.4'5.5' APPAREN TENCROAC H M E N TDRIVEWA Y &WOOD RE T A I N I N G GRAVEL DRIVEWA YWOOD RETAININGWOOD RETAININGAPPAREN T ENCROAC H M E N T R.R. TIE WALL CONCRETE APRON UPPER DECK STEPS FLAGSTO N E PATIO SIDEWALK2 - STOR Y FRAME H O U S E & GARAGE312 WEST H Y M A N A V E N U E 0.137± AC R E S5976± SQ. F T .NEIGHBORING RESIDENCECO N C R E T E C U R B & G U T T E R PAV E D R O A D W A Y MAI L B O X 4.4' APPAREN T ENCROAC H M E N T WOOD RE T A I N I N G OS WN6 7 ° 5 3 ' 3 3 " W 1 2 3 7 . 0 4 ' ( T I E ) CITY OF A S P E N GPS MON U M E N T # 7 CITY OF A S P E N GPS MON U M E N T # 6 ELEVATIO N : 7 8 9 3 . 6 1 S86°19' 5 1 " E 8 1 8 . 1 0 ' ( T I E ) 1 2 3 4 5 6 78 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 GARAGE 7901.31 FFE 7901.36 FFE 7901.33 SOUTH 2nd STREET(74.62' WIDE PUBLIC)79047903 790279017901 7901 790179 0 2 7902 790379 0 3 7 9 0 4 10' R E A R S E T B A C K - P R I N C I P A L B U I L D I N G 5' R E A R S E T B A C K - P R I N C I P A L B U I L D I N G U S E D A S G A R A G E & A C C E S S O R Y B U I L D I N G 5' MINIMUM SIDE SETBACK5' MINIMUM SIDE SETBACK10' F R O N T S E T B A C K PRI N C I P A L B U I L D I N G 15' F R O N T S E T B A C K ACC E S S O R Y B U I L D I N G CLERK AND RECORDER'S CERTIFICATETHIS PLAT WAS FILED FOR RECORD IN THE OFFICE OF THE CLERK AND RECORDER OF PITKIN COUNTY AT ____O'CLOCK____.M., ON THE ____ DAY OF__________, A.D. 20__, AND IS DULY RECORDED IN BOOK _____,PAGE ______, RECEPTION NO.______________________. ______________________________________ CLERK AND RECORDER BY:____________________________________ DEPUTY SURVEYOR'S STATEMENT I, RODNEY P. KISER, DO HEREBY STATE THAT THIS SURVEY WAS PREPARED BY TRUE NORTH COLORADO, LLC. FOR ______________________________________, THAT SAID SURVEY WAS PREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY SUPERVISION AND RESPONSIBLE CHARGE AND THAT IT IS TRUE AND CORRECT TO THE BEST OF MY BELIEF AND KNOWLEDGE. RODNEY P. KISER, PLS 38215 COLORADO PROFESSIONAL SURVEYOR COUNTY SURVEYOR'S CERTIFICATE DEPOSITED THIS _____ DAY OF __________________, 20__, AT________M., IN THE GARFIELD COUNTY INDEX FOR INFORMATIONAL LAND SURVEY PLATS UNDER RECEPTION NUMBER _______________________. BY: _____________________________________ GARFIELD COUNTY SURVEYOR DATE:____________________________________ FILING INFORMATION: SECTION ____, TOWNSHIP ____, RANGE ____, OF THE 6TH P.M. IT IS THE INDIVIDUAL LOT OWNER'S RESPONSIBILITY, ACCORDING TO THE COLORADO NOXIOUS WEED ACT AND GARFIELD COUNTY'S WEED MANAGEMENT PLAN, TO MANAGE ANY NOXIOUS WEEDS ON HIS OR HER PROPERTY. SUBJECT TO PATENT RESERVATIONS, THE MINERAL RIGHTS TO THIS REAL PROPERTY ARE NOT SEVERED FROM THE SURFACE, AND ARE NOT UNDER LEASE. MINERAL RIGHTS: COMMITMENT FOR TITLE INSURANCE ISSUED BY LAND TITLE GUARANTEE COMPANY, ORDER NUMBER ________, DISCLOSES THE FOLLOWING MINERAL RIGHTS: RIGHT OF THE PROPRIETOR OF A VEIN OR LOAD TO EXTRACT OR REMOVE ORE THEREFROM, SHOULD THE SAME BE FOUND TO PENETRATE OR INTERSECT THE PREMISES, AS RESERVED IN UNITED STATES PATENT RECORDED MAY 3, 1921 IN BOOK 73 AT PAGE 126. ONE (1) DOG WILL BE ALLOWED FOR EACH RESIDENTIAL UNIT AND THE DOG SHALL BE REQUIRED TO BE CONFINED WITHIN THE OWNERS' PROPERTY BOUNDARIES. NO OPEN HEARTH SOLID-FUEL FIREPLACES WILL BE ALLOWED ANYWHERE WITHIN THE SUBDIVISION. ONE (1) NEW SOLID-FUEL BURNING STOVE AS DEFINED BY C.R.S. 25-7-401, ET. SEQ., AND THE REGULATIONS PROMULGATED THEREUNDER, WILL BE ALLOWED IN ANY DWELLING UNIT. ALL DWELLING UNITS WILL BE ALLOWED AN UNRESTRICTED NUMBER OF NATURAL GAS BURNING STOVES AND APPLIANCES. ALL EXTERIOR LIGHTING WILL BE THE MINIMUM AMOUNT NECESSARY AND ALL EXTERIOR LIGHTING WILL BE DIRECTED INWARD AND DOWNWARD, TOWARDS THE INTERIOR OF THE SUBDIVISION, EXCEPT THAT PROVISIONS MAY BE MADE TO ALLOW FOR SAFETY LIGHTING THAT GOES BEYOND THE PROPERTY BOUNDARIES. NO FURTHER DIVISIONS OF LAND WITHIN THE SUBDIVISION WILL BE ALLOWED. COLORADO IS A "RIGHT-TO-FARM" STATE PURSUANT TO C.R.S. 35-3-101, ET SEQ. LANDOWNERS, RESIDENTS AND VISITORS MUST BE PREPARED TO ACCEPT THE ACTIVITIES, SIGHTS, SOUNDS AND SMELLS OF GARFIELD COUNTY'S AGRICULTURAL OPERATIONS AS A NORMAL AND NECESSARY ASPECT OF LIVING IN A COUNTY WITH A STRONG RURAL CHARACTER AND A HEALTHY RANCHING SECTOR. ALL MUST BE PREPARED TO ENCOUNTER NOISES, ODOR, LIGHTS, MUD, DUST, SMOKE, CHEMICALS, MACHINERY ON PUBLIC ROADS, LIVESTOCK ON PUBLIC ROADS, STORAGE AND DISPOSAL OF MANURE, AND THE APPLICATION BY SPRAYING OR OTHERWISE OF CHEMICAL FERTILIZERS, SOIL AMENDMENTS, HERBICIDES, AND PESTICIDES, ANY ONE OR MORE OF WHICH MAY NATURALLY OCCUR AS PART OF A LEGAL AND NON-NEGLIGENT AGRICULTURAL OPERATIONS. ALL RESIDENCES OVER 3,600 SQUARE FEET IN SIZE SHALL HAVE AUTOMATIC FIRE SPRINKLERS INSTALLED. INSTALLATION OF THE SPRINKLER SYSTEMS SHALL BE IN ACCORDANCE WITH NFPA 13D, STANDARD FOR THE INSTALLATION OF SPRINKLER SYSTEMS IN ONE AND TWO-FAMILY DWELLINGS AND MANUFACTURED HOMES. ALL ROADWAYS WITHIN THE DEVELOPMENT SHALL BE DEDICATED TO THE PUBLIC AND CONSTRUCTED TO STANDARDS CONSISTENT WITH SECTION 9:00 OF THE SUBDIVISION REGULATIONS OF 1984, AS AMENDED; REPAIR AND MAINTENANCE SHALL BE THE RESPONSIBILITY OF THE HOMEOWNERS ASSOCIATION OF THE SUBDIVISION. TREE TYPE SIZE DRIP TREE CHART 1 DECIDUOUS2 XX"XX' XX"XX' CONIFEROUS Signature Blocks for Pitkin County partial list provided by Planning Department 2010. PITKIN COUNTY HEARING OFFICER APROVAL THIS ACTIVITY ENVELOPE AND SITE PLAN HAS BEEN REVIEWED AND APPROVED BY THE HEARING OFFICER THIS _____ DAY OF ______, 20__, SUBJECT TO THE TERMS AND CONDITIONS OF THE HEARING OFFICER DETERMINATION NO. _______ RECORDED IN THE PITKIN COUNTY CLERK AND RECORDER'S OFFICE AS RECEPTION NO. ______. _________________________________________ PITKIN COUNTY HEARING OFFICER PITKIN COUNTY COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DIRECTOR APPROVAL THIS ACTIVITY ENVELOPE AND SITE PLAN HAS BEEN REVIEWED AND APPROVED BY THE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DIRECTOR THIS _____ DAY OF ______, 20__, SUBJECT TO THE TERMS AND CONDITIONS OF THE ADMINISTRATIVE DECISION NO. _______ RECORDED IN THE PITKIN COUNTY CLERK AND RECORDER'S OFFICE AS RECEPTION NO. __________. ___________________________________ COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DIRECTOR PITKIN COUNTY BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS THIS PLAT OF _____________________ HAS BEEN REVIEWED AND APPROVED BY THE PITKIN COUNTY BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS THIS _______ DAY OF ______, 20__. APPROVAL OF THIS PLAT IS SUBJECT TO THE TERMS AND CONDITIONS OF RESOLUTION NUMBER(S) _________ AND RECORDED AT RECEPTION NO. _____. THE DEDICATION OF ROADS IS ACCEPTED SUBJECT TO THE CONDITIONS THAT PITKIN COUNTY SHALL UNDERTAKE MAINTENANCE OF SUCH ROADS ONLY AFTER CONSTRUCTION OF SUCH ROADS HAS BEEN COMPLETED IN ACCORDANCE WITH PITKIN COUNTY SPECIFICATIONS AND THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS DOES NOT EXTEND TO UTILITIES, WASTE DISPOSAL SYSTEMS, OR ANY SERVICE FACILITIES. ____________________________________ CHAIRPERSON, BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS AMENDED PLAT (OR SITE PLAN)APPROVAL AND DEDICATION THIS AMENDED PLAT (OR SITE PLAN) OF ___________________ IS HEREBY APPROVED THIS _____ DAY OF _____, 20__. SUBJECT TO THE TERMS AND CONDITIONS OF [RESOLUTION, OR ADMINISTRATIVE DECISION, OR HEARING OFFICER DETERMINATION] NO. _________________. EXCEPT AS MODIFIED BY SUCH [RESOLUTION, OR ADMINISTRATIVE DECISION, OR HEARING OFFICER DETERMINATION], THE ORIGINAL PLAT (OR SITE PLAN) RECORDED AT BOOK _____ AND PAGE _____ AND THE CONDITIONS THEREOF REMAIN IN FULL FORCE AND EFFECT. ________________________________ PITKIN COUNTY HEARING OFFICER; OR PITKIN COUNTY COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT; OR CHAIRMAN, BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS CLERK AND RECORDER ACCEPTANCE FOR RECORDING THIS ACTIVITY ENVELOPE AND SITE PLAN HAS BEEN ACCEPTED FOR FILING IN THE OFFICE OF THE CLERK & RECORDER OF PITKIN COUNTY, COLORADO, ON THIS _______ DAY OF _______, 20__, IN PLAT BOOK _____ AT PAGE ______. ____________________________ CLERK AND RECORDER DISCLAIMER ENVIRONMENTAL HAZARD AREAS EXIST THAT MIGHT AFFECT THE PROPERTY, ANY IMPROVEMENTS, AND THE USE AND OCCUPANCY HEREOF. _________________________________ PROPERTY OWNER SURVEYOR'S CERTIFICATE I, _____________________, REGISTERED LAND SURVEYOR, DO HEREBY CERTIFY THAT I HAVE PREPARED THE PLAT OF ____________, THAT THAT LOCATION OF THE OUTSIDE BOUNDARY, ROADS AND OTHER FEATURES ARE ACCURATELY AND CORRECTLY SHOWN HEREON, THAT THE SAME ARE BASED ON FIELD SURVEYS AND THAT THE PLATTED SITE AND ROADS CONFORM TO THOSE STAKED ON THE GROUND. IN WITNESS THEREOF, I HAVE SET MY HAND AND SEAL THIS ______ DAY OF ______, 20__. ________________________________ SURVEYOR DEDICATION OF RIGHTS-OF-WAY FOR UTILITY PURPOSES UNLESS OTHERWISE SPECIFIED, ALL UTILITY EASEMENTS, AS WELL AS PUBLIC AND PRIVATE RIGHTS-OF-WAY, SHOW HEREON, ARE DEDICATED TO THE PERPETUAL USE OF ALL UTILITY COMPANIES FOR THE PURPOSE OF INSTALLING, CONSTRUCTING, REPLACING, REPAIRING, AND MAINTAINING UNDERGROUND UTILITIES AND DRAINAGE FACILITIES, INCLUDING (BUT NOT LIMITED TO) WATER, SEWER, ELECTRIC, GAS, TELEPHONE AND TELEVISION LINES; TOGETHER WITH THE RIGHT OF INGRESS AND EGRESS FOR SUCH INSTALLATION, CONSTRUCTION, REPLACEMENT, REPAIR AND MAINTENANCE, AS WELL AS THE RIGHT TO TRIM INTERFERING TREES AND BRUSH. IN NO EVENT SHALL THE UTILITY COMPANIES EXERCISE THE RIGHTS HEREIN GRANTED SO AS TO INTERFERE WITH THE USE OF THE RIGHT-OF-WAY FOR ROADWAY PURPOSES EXCEPT TO THE EXTENT REASONABLY NECESSARY TO ENJOY THE GRANT HEREBY MADE. IMPROVEMENT SURVEY STATEMENT I HEREBY STATE THAT THIS IMPROVEMENT SURVEY WAS PREPARED BY TRUE NORTH COLORADO, LLC FOR ______________________. I FURTHER STATE THAT THE IMPROVEMENTS ON THE ABOVE DESCRIBED PARCEL ON THIS DATE, __________________________, EXCEPT UTILITY CONNECTIONS, ARE ENTIRELY WITHIN THE BOUNDARIES OF THE PARCEL, EXCEPT AS SHOWN, THAT THERE ARE NO ENCROACHMENTS UPON THE DESCRIBED PREMISES BY IMPROVEMENTS ON ANY ADJOINING PREMISES, EXCEPT AS INDICATED, AND THAT THERE IS NO APPARENT EVIDENCE OR SIGN OF ANY EASEMENT CROSSING OR BURDENING ANY PART OF SAID PARCEL, EXCEPT AS NOTED. LINER ERROR OF CLOSURE IS LESS THAN 1:10,000. RODNEY P. KISER, PLS 38215 COLORADO PROFESSIONAL SURVEYOR GARFIELD GENERAL PLAT NOTES 2009 CHECK REGS FOR UPDATES. LIENHOLDER CONSENT AND SUBORDINATION THE UNDERSIGNED, BEING THE BENEFICIARY UNDER A DEED OF TRUST GRANTED BY THE OWNER(S) UPON THE REAL PROPERTY PLATTED AND DIVIDED AS SHOWN UPON THE WITHIN FINAL PLAT OF __________________________SUBDIVISION, CERTIFIES THAT THE UNDERSIGNED HAS REVIEWED THE FINAL PLAT OF ___________________ SUBDIVISION AND BY THIS CERTIFICATION HEREBY CONSENTS TO SAID FINAL PLAT OF _______________ SUBDIVISION AND TO THE RECORDING THEREOF. BENEFICIARY FURTHER CONSENTS TO SAID FINAL PLAT OF __________________ SUBDIVISION AS STATED IN THE CERTIFICATE OF DEDICATION AND OWNERSHIP EXECUTED BY THE OWNER(S) HEREON, AND HEREBY SUBORDINATES ANY INTEREST THAT BENEFICIARY MAY HAVE IN AND TO THE PROPERTY SUBJECT TO SUCH DEDICATION, TO THE ENTITY(IES) OR THE GENERAL PUBLIC TO WHICH SUCH DEDICATION IS MADE. EXECUTED THIS _______ DAY OF _________________, A.D., 20__. MORTGAGE OR BANK NAME BY:________________________________ STATE OF______________ ) ) SS COUNTY OF ____________ ) THE FOREGOING LIENHOLDER CONSENT AND SUBORDINATION WAS ACKNOWLEDGED BEFORE ME THIS ____ DAY OF ___________________, 20__, BY ______________________. MY COMMISSION EXPIRES:________________________ WITNESS MY HAND AND SEAL: _____________________________ NOTARY PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT SURVEY PLAT GARFIELD COUNTY PLAT CERTS PITKIN PLAT CERTS SURVEYOR'S CERTIFICATE I, RODNEY P. KISER, DO HEREBY CERTIFY THAT I AM A PROFESSIONAL LAND SURVEYOR LICENSED UNDER THELAWS OF THE STATE OF COLORADO, THAT THIS FINAL PLAT IS A TRUE, CORRECT AND COMPLETE PLAT OF____________________________, AS LAID OUT, PLATTED, DEDICATED AND SHOWN HEREON, THAT SUCH PLAT WASMADE FROM AN ACCURATE SURVEY OF SAID PROPERTY BY ME AND UNDER MY SUPERVISION AND CORRECTLYSHOWS THE LOCATION AND DIMENSIONS OF THE LOTS, EASEMENTS AND STREETS OF ______________________ ASTHE SAME ARE STAKED UPON THE GROUND IN COMPLIANCE WITH APPLICABLE REGULATIONS GOVERNING THESUBDIVISION OF LAND. IN WITNESS WHEREOF I HAVE SET MY HAND AND SEAL THIS ____ DAY OF _______________, 20__. BY:_____________________________________ RODNEY P. KISER, PLS 38215 BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS CERTIFICATE THIS FINAL PLAT OF ____________________ IS APPROVED BY THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF GARFIELD COUNTY, COLORADO THIS ________ DAY OF _____________, 20__, FOR FILING WITH THE CLERK AND RECORDER OF GARFIELD COUNTY AND FOR CONVEYANCE TO THE COUNTY OF THE PUBLIC DEDICATIONS SHOWN HEREON, SUBJECT TO THE PROVISION THAT APPROVAL IN NO WAY OBLIGATES GARFIELD COUNTY FOR FINANCING OR CONSTRUCTION OF IMPROVEMENTS ON LANDS, PUBLIC ROADS, HIGHWAYS OR EASEMENTS DEDICATED TO THE PUBLIC, EXCEPT AS SPECIFICALLY AGREED TO BY THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS BY SUBSEQUENT RESOLUTION. THIS APPROVAL SHALL IN NO WAY OBLIGATE GARFIELD COUNTY FOR THE CONSTRUCTION, REPAIR OR MAINTENANCE OF PUBLIC ROADS, HIGHWAYS OR ANY OTHER PUBLIC DEDICATIONS SHOWN HEREON. BY:____________________________________ CHAIRMAN, BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS GARFIELD COUNTY, COLORADO WITNESS MY HAND AND THE SEAL OF THE COUNTY OF GARFIELD. ATTEST:_______________________________ COUNTY CLERK CERTIFICATE OF OWNERSHIP THE UNDERSIGNED _______________________, BEING SOLE OWNER(S) IN FEE SIMPLE OF ALL THAT REAL PROPERTY SITUATED IN GARFIELD COUNTY, DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: "INSERT PROPERTY DESCRIPTION" CONTAINING _____ ACRES, MORE OR LESS, HAVE CAUSED THE DESCRIBED REAL PROPERTY TO BE SURVEYED, LAID OUT, PLATTED AND SUBDIVIDED INTO LOTS AND BLOCKS AS SHOWN ON THIS FINAL PLAT UNDER THE NAME AND STYLE OF ___________________, A SUBDIVISION IN COUNTY OF GARFIELD. EXECUTED THIS ____ DAY OF _________________. A.D., 20__. OWNER: name and address STATE OF COLORADO ) )ss COUNTY OF GARFIELD ) THE FOREGOING CERTIFICATION OF OWNERSHIP WAS ACKNOWLEDGED BEFORE ME THIS _______ DAY OF_________________, 20__, BY_____________________. MY COMMISSION EXPIRES:________________________ WITNESS MY HAND AND SEAL __________________________________ NOTARY PUBLIC CERTIFICATE OF TAXES PAID I, THE UNDERSIGNED, DO HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THE ENTIRE AMOUNT OF TAXES AND ASSESSMENTS DUE AND PAYABLE AS OF______________, UPON ALL PARCELS OF REAL ESTATE DESCRIBED ON THIS PLAT ARE PAID FULL. DATED THIS _____ DAY OF _________________, A.D., 20__. BY:_________________________________ TREASURER OF GARFIELD COUNTY TITLE CERTIFICATE I, ___________________________________, AN ATTORNEY LICENSED TO PRACTICE LAW IN THE STATE OFCOLORADO, OR AGENT AUTHORIZED BY A TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY, DO HEREBY CERTIFY THAT I HAVEEXAMINED THE TITLE TO ALL LANDS SHOWN UPON THIS PLAT AND THAT TITLE TO SUCH LANDS IS VESTED INBERKELEY FAMILY LIMITED PARTNERSHIP, FREE AND CLEAR OF ALL LIENS AND ENCUMBRANCES (INCLUDINGMORTGAGES, DEEDS OF TRUST, JUDGMENTS, EASEMENTS, CONTRACTS AND AGREEMENTS OF RECORDAFFECTING THE REAL PROPERTY IN THIS PLAT), EXCEPTAS FOLLOWS:____________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________. DATED THIS_______DAY OF_____________, A.D., 20__. TITLE COMPANY: ____________________________________ ____________________________________AGENT OR BY:________________________________________ ATTORNEY COLORADO ATTORNEY REGISTRATION NO.___________ WV ELECTRICAL TRANSFORMER SANITARY CLEAN-OUT WATER VALVE TELEPHONE PEDESTAL ELECTRIC PEDESTAL SET NO. 5 REBAR & CAP L.S. NO. 38215 CATV PEDESTAL FOUND PROPERTY CORNER AS DESCRIBED DYH OSW GV S D W UTILITY POLE/POWER POLE GUY ANCHOR TELEPHONE VAULT ELECTRICAL VAULT LIGHT POLE STREET SIGN HANDICAP PARKING DECIDUOUS TREE CONIFEROUS TREE FIRE HYDRANT WATER SHUTOFF GAS VALVE SANITARY MANHOLE STORM SEWER MANHOLE ELECTRIC MANHOLE WELL 1/16 AND SMALLER, TRACT, HES, MS COR. SECTION CORNER 1/4 OR 1/16 COR. CENTER 1/4 COR WATER MANHOLE E T WATER METER GAS METER ELECTRICAL METER G TELEPHONE MANHOLET ELECTRIC MARKER GAS MARKER ELECTRICAL OUTLET LANDSCAPE LIGHT IRRIGATION VALVE BOX G W IVB DRY WELL VICINITY MAP TELEPHONE WATER W SANITARY - STORM CURB INLET CATCH BASIN GAS ELECTRIC E E E SIGNS TREES BUSH DECIDUOUS TREE PROPERTY MARKERS SATELLITE DISH FLAG POLE IMPROVEMENT LOCATION CERTIFICATE I HEREBY STATE THAT THIS IMPROVEMENT LOCATION CERTIFICATE WAS PREPARED BY TRUE NORTH COLORADO, LLC FOR _______________________, THAT IT IS NOT A LAND SURVEY PLAT OR AN IMPROVEMENT SURVEY PLAT, AND THAT IT IS NOT TO BE RELIED UPON FOR THE ESTABLISHMENT OF FENCE, BUILDING, OR OTHER FUTURE IMPROVEMENT LINES. I FURTHER STATE THAT THE IMPROVEMENTS ON THE ABOVE DESCRIBED PARCEL ON THIS DATE OF __________________, 20__, EXCEPT UTILITY CONNECTIONS, ARE ENTIRELY WITHIN THE BOUNDARIES OF THE PARCEL, EXCEPT AS SHOWN, THAT THERE ARE NO ENCROACHMENTS UPON THE DESCRIBED PREMISES BY IMPROVEMENTS ON ANY ADJOINING PREMISES, EXCEPT AS INDICATED, AND THAT THERE IS NO APPARENT EVIDENCE OR SIGN OF ANY EASEMENT CROSSING OR BURDENING ANY PART OF SAID PARCEL, EXCEPT AS NOTED. RODNEY P. KISER, PLS 38215 COLORADO PROFESSIONAL SURVEYOR COUNTY SURVEYOR'S CERTIFICATE APPROVED FOR CONTENT AND FORM ONLY AND NOT THE ACCURACY OF SURVEYS, CALCULATIONS AND DRAFTING PURSUANT TO C.R.S., 38-51-101 AND 102, ET SEQ. DATED THIS _____ DAY OF ______________, 20__. BY:___________________________________ GARFIELD COUNTY SURVEYOR WATER LINE SEWER LINE TELEPHONE LINE FIBER OPTIC LINE GAS LINE OVERHEAD ELECTRIC LINE SILT FENCE LINE FENCE LINE CATV LINE UTILITY LINES ORF REV I E W PRELIMINARY FLOOD ZONE STATEMENT A PORTION OF THIS PROPERTY LIES WITH FLOOD ZONE A ACCORDING TO FEMA FLOOD INSURANCE RATE MAP COMMUNITY PANEL NO. 08097C0066 C, HAVING AN EFFECTIVE DATE OF JUNE 4, 1987, THE STRUCTURE, HOWEVER LIES OUTSIDE OF SAID FLOOD ZONE A AS SHOWN HEREON. LAND SURVEY DEPOSIT MESA COUNTY SURVEYOR'S OFFICE DATE:__________________________ BOOK NO:_________, PAGE:_________ DEPOSIT NO:______________________ AS-BUILT SURVEY CERTIFICATION STATEMENT "I, THE UNDERSIGNED REGISTERED LAND SURVEYOR, HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THE ELEVATIONS, GRADING AND DRAINAGE FEATURES SHOWN OF THE PROPERTY DESCRIBED AS XXXXXXXXXXX WERE DEVELOPED FROM SURVEYING THE PROPERTY ON THE DATE OF:XXXXXXXXXXXXX AND ACCURATELY DEPICT THE ELEVATIONS EXISTING DURING THE SURVEY. THE ELEVATIONS MAY CHANGE SUBSEQUENT TO THE SURVEY DUE TO SUBSIDENCE, UPHEAVAL, EROSION, ACTS OF MAN OR OTHER FACTORS. THEREFORE, THIS CERTIFICATE MAY NOT ACCURATELY DEPICT ELEVATIONS, GRADING AND DRAINAGE PATTERN AFTER THE DATE OF THE SURVEY. EASEMENTS ARE SHOWN PER THE PLAT UNLESS NOTED OTHERWISE. NO PART OF THIS LIES WITHIN THE 100-YEAR FLOODPLAIN AS DEFINED BY FEMA, EXCEPT AS NOTED." RODNEY P. KISER, PLS 38215 FOR AND BEHALF OF:XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX. CLERK AND RECORDER'S CERTIFICATE THIS ACTIVITY ENVELOPE AND SITE PLAN HAS BEEN ACCEPTED FOR RECORDING IN THE OFFICE OF THE CLERK AND RECORDER OF PITKIN COUNTY, COLORADO THIS ____ DAY OF __________, 2015, PLAT BOOK _____, PAGE ______, AS RECEPTION NO.________________. ______________________________________ CLERK AND RECORDER BY:____________________________________ DEPUTY PITKIN COUNTY COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DIRECTOR'S APPROVAL THIS ACTIVITY ENVELOPE AND SITE PLAN HAS BEEN REVIEWED AND APPROVED BY THE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DIRECTOR OF PITKIN COUNTY THIS _____ DAY OF ______, 2015 AND HAS BEEN PREPARED PURSUANT TO ADMINISTRATIVE DECISION NO. ________, RECORDED AS RECEPTION NO. ___________. _______________________________________ CINDY HOUBEN - COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DIRECTOR OWNER'S ACKNOWLEDGMENT THE OWNER ACKNOWLEDGES BEING INFORMED BY PITKIN COUNTY OF THE EXISTENCE OF "ENVIRONMENTAL HAZARD AREAS" THAT MIGHT AFFECT THE PROPERTY, ANY IMPROVEMENTS, AND THE USE THEREOF. THEN PROVISIONS OF THE PITKIN COUNTY REGULATIONS DO NOT IN ANY WAY ASSURE OR IMPLY THAT THE AREAS OUTSIDE OF DESIGNATED HAZARD AREAS WILL BE FREE FROM HAZARDS OR THAT APPROVED MITIGATION MEASURES WILL GUARANTEE THE SAFETY OF THE PROPERTY. (OWNER) BY:_______________________________________ OWNER'S CERTIFICATE KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS, THAT ____________, BEING THE OWNER(s) IN FEE SIMPLE OF THE LANDS SHOWN HEREON AND DOES HEREBY ESTABLISH THE SITE PLAN SET FORTH HEREON. (OWNER) BY: ____________________________ ROCK WALL CO DW UNDERGROUND ELECTRIC LINE TOPOGRAPHIC SURVEYEXISTING CONDITIONS SURVEYALTA/NSPS LAND TITLE SURVEY CITY OF ASPEN SURVEYOR'S CERTIFICATION I, RODNEY P. KISER, HEREBY CERTIFY TO XXXXXXXXXX, THAT THIS IS AN "IMPROVEMENT SURVEY PLAT" AS DEFINED BY C.R.S.38-51-102(9) AND THAT IT IS A MONUMENTED LAND SURVEY SHOWING THE LOCATION OF ALL STRUCTURES, VISIBLE UTILITIES, FENCES, HEDGES, OR WALLS SITUATED ON THE DESCRIBED PARCEL AND WITHIN FIVE FEET OF ALL BOUNDARIES OF SUCH PARCEL, ANY CONFLICTING BOUNDARY EVIDENCE OR VISIBLE ENCROACHMENTS, AND ALL EASEMENTS, UNDERGROUND UTILITIES, AND TUNNELS DESCRIBED IN THE TITLE COMPANY'S COMMITMENT FOR TITLE INSURANCE ORDER NO. 01330-73339, OR OTHER SOURCES AS SPECIFIED ON THE IMPROVEMENT SURVEY PLAT. RODNEY P. KISER, PLS NO. 38215 COLORADO PROFESSIONAL LAND SURVEYOR NOTES: BASIS OF BEARINGS FOR THIS SURVEY IS A BEARING OF S26°12'00"E ALONG THE EASTERLY PROPERTY LINEBETWEEN THE NORTHEAST CORNER A FOUND ALUMINUM CAP LS17664 AND THE SOUTHEAST CORNER A SETREBAR AND YELLOW PLASTIC CAP LS38215 AS SHOWN HEREON. BASIS OF BEARING FOR THIS SURVEY ARE BASED ON TRUE NORTH FROM GPS OBSERVATIONS YIELDING ABEARING OF XXXXXXXXX. DATE OF FIELD SURVEY: JANUARY 28 2016, AT THE TIME OF THE SURVEY THERE WAS 2-4 FEET OF SNOW ONTHE GROUND. LINEAR UNITS USED TO PERFORM THIS SURVEY WERE U.S. SURVEY FEET. THIS SURVEY IS BASED ON THE DIVIDE RECORDED AUGUST 28, 1989 IN PLAT BOOK 23 AT PAGE 27 ANDCORNERS FOUND IN PLACE AS SHOWN HEREON. THIS IMPROVEMENT SURVEY PLAT DOES NOT CONSTITUTE A TITLE SEARCH BY TRUE NORTH COLORADO, LLCFOR ALL INFORMATION REGARDING EASEMENT, RIGHTS-OF-WAY AND/OR TITLE OF RECORD, TRUE NORTHCOLORADO, LLC. RELIED UPON TITLE COMMITMENT NO. XXXXXXXXXXXX ISSUED BY XXXXXXXXXXXXX,EFFECTIVE DATE: XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX THIS PROPERTY IS SUBJECT TO RESERVATIONS, RESTRICTIONS, COVENANTS AND EASEMENTS OF RECORDOR IN PLACE. THIS SURVEY WAS PREPARED WITHOUT THE BENEFIT OF A TITLE COMMITMENT, THEREFORE, ANYEXCEPTIONS TO TITLE THAT MAY AFFECT THE SUBJECT PROPERTY HAVE NOT BEEN RESEARCHED BY TRUENORTH COLORADO, LLC. ELEVATIONS SHOWN HEREON ARE BASED ON NORTH AMERICAN VERTICAL DATUM OF 1988 (NAVD 88)REFERENCED FROM NATIONAL GEODETIC SURVEY (NGS) BENCHMARK STATION S 159 HAVING AN ELEVATIONOF 7720.88. ELEVATIONS SHOWN HEREON ARE BASED ON GPS OBSERVATIONS UTILIZING THE CONTINUOUS OPERATINGREFERENCE STATIONS (CORS) THROUGH THE MESA COUNTY RTVRN NETWORK BROAD CASTING NORTHAMERICAN VERTICAL DATUM (NAVD88) YIELDING AN ON-SITE ELEVATION OF XXXXXX ELEVATIONS SHOWN HEREON WERE DERIVED FROM GPS OBSERVATIONS ON XX-XX-XXXX AND ARE BASEDON NORTH AMERICAN VERTICAL DATUM OF 1988 (NAVD88) WHICH DATA WAS OBTAINED FROM THE NATIONALGEODETIC SURVEY ONLINE POSITIONING USER SERVICE (OPUS). CONTOUR INTERVAL EQUALS 1 FOOT. UNDERGROUND UTILITIES HAVE BEEN MARKED OUT BY OTHERS, ONLY PAINT MARKS AND UTILITY FLAGSHAVE BEEN LOCATED BY TRUE NORTH COLORADO, LLC. THE ACTUAL LOCATION OF UNDERGROUND UTILITIESMUST BE FIELD VERIFIED PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION. SLOPES SHOWN HEREON ARE BASED ON TOPOGRAPHIC SURVEY DATA COLLECTED IN THE FIELD ON APRIL 25& 26, 2018 WHICH HAS BEEN CLASSIFIED INTO SLOPES OF 30% TO 40% AND AREAS WITH SLOPES GREATERTHAN 40% USING A COMPUTER ANALYSIS MEASURED BETWEEN EACH CONTOUR INTERVAL. UNDERGROUND UTILITIES SHOWN HEREON (GAS, ELECTRIC, CATV & TELEPHONE) WERE LOCATED BYROARING FORK UTILITY LOCATORS LLC. WATER & SEWER SERVICES WERE TAKEN FROM THE RECORDEDPLAT OF MOSES LOT SPLIT. UTILITIES SHOWN HEREON ARE FOR PLANNING PURPOSES ONLY. PLEASE CALL811 PRIOR TO ANY DIGGING OR EARTHWORK CONSTRUCTION FOR UTILITY VERIFICATION. SURVEYOR'S STATEMENT (LAND SURVEY PLAT) I, RODNEY P. KISER, DO HEREBY STATE THAT THIS SURVEY WAS PREPARED BY TRUE NORTH COLORADO, LLC FOR ______________________________________, THAT SAID FIELD SURVEY WAS PERFORMED UNDER MY SUPERVISION AND RESPONSIBLE CHARGE AND THAT THIS SURVEY MEETS THE REQUIREMENTS OF A LAND SURVEY PLAT AS SET FORTH IN C.R.S. SECTION 38-51-106 AND IS TRUE AND CORRECT TO THE BEST OF MY BELIEF AND KNOWLEDGE. RODNEY P. KISER, PLS 38215 COLORADO PROFESSIONAL LAND SURVEYOR TELEPHONE PEDESTAL GAS METER ELECTRICAL METER G LEGEND E SURVEYOR'S CERTIFICATION I, RODNEY P. KISER, HEREBY CERTIFY TO HENRY LAMBERT & CAREY BOND THAT THIS IS AN "IMPROVEMENT SURVEY PLAT" AS DEFINED BY C.R.S.38-51-102(9) AND THAT IT IS A MONUMENTED LAND SURVEY PERFORMED UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION AND RESPONSIBLE CHARGE SHOWING THE LOCATION OF ALL STRUCTURES, VISIBLE UTILITIES, FENCES, HEDGES, OR WALLS SITUATED ON THE DESCRIBED PARCEL AND WITHIN FIVE FEET OF ALL BOUNDARIES OF SUCH PARCEL, ANY CONFLICTING BOUNDARY EVIDENCE OR VISIBLE ENCROACHMENTS, AND ALL EASEMENTS, UNDERGROUND UTILITIES, AND TUNNELS DESCRIBED IN THE ATTORNEYS TITLE INSURANCE AGENCY OF ASPEN, LLC COMMITMENT FOR TITLE INSURANCE COMMITMENT NO. 18003943, OR OTHER SOURCES AS SPECIFIED ON THE IMPROVEMENT SURVEY PLAT. LINEAR ERROR OF CLOSURE IS LEES THAN 1:15,000. RODNEY P. KISER LICENSED PROFESSIONAL LAND SURVEYOR COLORADO REGISTRATION NO. 38215 SURVEY NOTES: 1. BASIS OF BEARINGS FOR THIS SURVEY IS A BEARING OF N75°09'11"W BETWEEN A FOUND NO. 5 REBARS AS SHOWN HEREON. 2. DATE OF FIELD SURVEY: JANUARY 15, 2019 AND JANUARY 25, 2019. AT THE TIME OF THE FIELD SURVEYTHERE WAS 4"+ OF SNOW ON THE GROUND. 3. LINEAR UNITS USED TO PERFORM THIS SURVEY WERE U.S. SURVEY FEET. 4. THIS SURVEY IS BASED ON THE OFFICIAL MAP OF THE CITY OF ASPEN DATED DECEMBER 18, 1959 AS RECEPTION NO. 109043, THE PLAT OF RESUBDIVIDED LOTS K, L, M, N, O, BLOCK 46 RECORDED JANUARY 15, 1982 IN PLAT BOOK 12 AT PAGE 54 AND CORNERS FOUND IN PLACE AS SHOWN HEREON. 5. THIS IMPROVEMENT SURVEY PLAT DOES NOT CONSTITUTE A TITLE SEARCH BY TRUE NORTH COLORADO, LLC, FOR ALL INFORMATION REGARDING EASEMENT, RIGHTS-OF-WAY AND/OR TITLE OF RECORD, TRUE NORTH COLORADO, LLC. RELIED UPON TITLE COMMITMENT NO. 18003943 ISSUED BY ATTORNEYS TITLE INSURANCE AGENCY OF ASPEN, LLC, EFFECTIVE DATE: JANUARY 22, 2019. 6. BEARINGS AND DISTANCES SHOWN HEREON ARE BASED ON FIELD MEASUREMENTS. BEARINGS ANDDISTANCES SHOWN IN PARENTHESIS ARE OF RECORD SHOWN ON THE OFFICIAL MAP OF THE CITY OF ASPEN DATED NOVEMBER 16, 1959. 7. THE SUBJECT PROPERTY LIES WITHIN FLOOD ZONE X WHICH ARE AREAS DETERMINED TO BE OUTSIDE THE 500-YEAR FLOOD PLAIN) ACCORDING TO FEMA FLOOD INSURANCE RATE MAP COMMUNITY PANEL NO. 08097C0203C WITH AN EFFECTIVE DATE OF JUNE 4, 1987. 8. THERE ARE NO NATURAL HAZARDS THAT EXIST ON THE SUBJECT PROPERTY. 9. NATURAL SLOPES ARE BETWEEN 0% TO 15% OVER THE ENTIRE SITE. 10. BASED ON 1958 CITY OF ASPEN TOPOGRAPHY THE SUBJECT PROPERTY DOES NOT APPEAR TO BE MANIPULATED FROM HISTORIC GRADE. LOTS P & Q - BLOCK 46, CITY AND TOWNSITE OF ASPEN SECTION 12, TOWNSHIP 10 SOUTH, RANGE 85 WEST OF THE 6TH PMCOUNTY OF PITKIN, STATE OF COLORADO IMPROVEMENT & TOPOGRAPHICSURVEY PLAT YEARS FROM THE DATE OF CERTIFICATION SHOWN HEREON. AFTER YOU FIRST DISCOVER SUCH DEFECT. IN NO EVENT MAY ANY ACTION ACTION BASED UPON ANY DEFECT IN THIS SURVEY WITHIN THREE YEARS BASED UPON ANY DEFECT IN THIS SURVEY BE COMMENCED MORE THAN TEN NOTICE: ACCORDING TO COLORADO LAW YOU MUST COMMENCE ANY LEGAL TRUE NORTH COLORADO LLC. A LAND SURVEYING AND MAPPING COMPANY PO BOX 614 - 529 S. WILD HORSE DRIVE NEW CASTLE, COLORADO 81647 (970) 984-0474 www.truenorthcolorado.com PROJECT NO: 2019-115 DATE: FEBRUARY 1, 2019 DRAWN RPK SURVEYED LDV SHEET 1 OF 1 TRUE NORTH COLORADO A LAND SURVEYING AND MAPPING COMPANY HENRY LAMBERT & CAREY BOND IMPROVEMENT & TOPOGRAPHIC SURVEY PLAT LOTS P & Q - BLOCK 46 CITY OF ASPEN COUNTY OF PITKIN - STATE OF COLORADO 8'4'16' SCALE: 1" = 8' N PROPERTY DESCRIPTION: LOTS P AND Q, BLOCK 46, CITY AND TOWNSITE OF ASPEN. COUNTY OF PITKIN STATE OF COLORADO 0 ACCESS & UTILITY EASEMENT SECTION 22, TOWNSHIP 9 SOUTH,RANGE 86 WEST OF THE 6TH P.M.COUNTY OF PITKIN, STATE OF COLORADO ACCESS & UTILITY EASEMENT A STRIP OF LAND SITUATED IN SECTION 22, TOWNSHIP 9 SOUTH, RANGE 86 WEST OF THE SIXTH PRINCIPAL MERIDIAN, COUNTY OF PITKIN, STATE OF COLORADO; SAID STRIP OF LAND LYING TEN FEET (10') ON EACH SIDE OF THE FOLLOWING DESCRIBED CENTERLINE: COMMENCING AT THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF SAID SECTION 22; THENCE N56°56'19"E A DISTANCE OF 2145.08 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING; THENCE ALONG SAID CENTERLINE THE FOLLOWING THREE (3) COURSES: 1.) S89°17'34"W A DISTANCE OF 44.87 FEET; 2.) S62°48'55"W A DISTANCE OF 22.45 FEET; 3.) S45°23'26"W A DISTANCE OF 76.76 FEET TO THE POINT OF TERMINUS; (WHENCE THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF SAID SECTION 22 BEARS: S56°37'35"W A DISTANCE OF 2009.67 FEET); SAID STRIP OF LAND CONTAINS 2,878 SQUARE FEET MORE OR LESS. PROJECT NO: 2017-160 DATE: JULY 13, 2017 DRAWN RPK SURVEYED LDV SHEET 1 OF 1 V. HAWLEY SMITH SECTION 22, TOWNSHIP 9 SOUTH, RANGE 86 WEST OF 6TH P.M. COUNTY OF PITKIN, STATE OF COLORADOTRUENORTH COLORADO A LAND SURVEYING AND MAPPING COMPANY SCALE: 1" = 30' N ACCESS & UTILITY EASEMENTA STRIP OF LAND SITUATED IN SECTION 22, TOWNSHIP 9 SOUTH, RANGE 86 WEST OF THE SIXTH PRINCIPAL MERIDIAN, COUNTY OFPITKIN, STATE OF COLORADO; SAID STRIP OF LAND LYING TEN FEET (10') ON EACH SIDE OF THE FOLLOWING DESCRIBEDCENTERLINE:COMMENCING AT THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF SAID SECTION 22; THENCE N56°56'19"E A DISTANCE OF 2145.08 FEET TO THE POINTOF BEGINNING; THENCE ALONG SAID CENTERLINE THE FOLLOWING THREE (3) COURSES:1.) S89°17'34"W A DISTANCE OF 44.87 FEET;2.) S62°48'55"W A DISTANCE OF 22.45 FEET;3.) S45°23'26"W A DISTANCE OF 76.76 FEET TO THE POINT OF TERMINUS; (WHENCE THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF SAID SECTION 22BEARS: S56°37'35"W A DISTANCE OF 2009.67 FEET); SAID STRIP OF LAND CONTAINS 2,878 SQUARE FEET MORE OR LESS.PROJECT NO: 2017-160DATE: JULY 13, 2017 DRAWNRPKSURVEYEDLDV SHEET1 OF 1V. HAWLEY SMITHSECTION 22, TOWNSHIP 9 SOUTH, RANGE 86 WEST OF 6TH P.M.COUNTY OF PITKIN, STATE OF COLORADOTRUENORTHCOLORADOA LAND SURVEYING AND MAPPING COMPANY PROJECT NO: 2017-104 DATE: December 13, 2017 TRUE NORTH COLORADO A LAND SURVEYING AND MAPPING COMPANY DRAWING NO. TITLE IMPROVEMENT & TOPOGRAPHIC SURVEY V-1 DATE REVISION GUNNISON COUNTY CLERK AND RECORDER'S ACCEPTANCE THIS SURVEY WAS ACCEPTED FOR DEPOSIT IN THE OFFICE OF THE CLERK AND RECORDER OF GUNNISON COUNTY, COLORADO ON THIS DAY OF __________________________________, 2018, DEPOSIT NUMBER______________________________. TIME:_________________________________________, DATE:_____________________________. ______________________________________________________________________________ GUNNISON COUNTY CLERK AND RECORDER EAGLE COUNTY SURVEYOR'S CERTIFICATE DEPOSITED THIS _____ DAY OF ____________________, 2018, AT _________.M. IN BOOK _____ OF THE EAGLE COUNTY SURVEYOR'S LAND SURVEY PLATS/RIGHTS-OF-WAY SURVEYS AT PAGE ________. THIS LAND SURVEY PLAT COMPLIES WITH SECTION 38-51-106(1), OF THE COLORADO REVISED STATUTES. ____________________________________________________________________________________ COUNTY SURVEYOR BILL SURVEYOR'S NOTES 1. THIS SURVEY DOES NOT CONSTITUTE A TITLE SEARCH BY THIS SURVEYOR OF THE PROPERTY SHOWN AND DESCRIBED HEREON TO DETERMINE: A. OWNERSHIP OF THE TRACT OF LAND B. COMPATIBILITY OF THIS DESCRIPTION WITH THOSE OF ADJOINERS C. RIGHT'S-OF WAY, EASEMENTS AND ENCUMBRANCES OF RECORD AFFECTING THIS PARCEL. 6. THIS ALTA/ACSM LAND TITLE SURVEY DOES NOT CONSTITUTE A TITLE SEARCH BY HIGH COUNTRY ENGINEERING, INC. FOR ALL INFORMATION REGARDING EASEMENTS, RIGHTS 0F WAY AND/OR TITLE OF RECORD, HIGH COUNTRY ENGINEERING, INC. RELIED UPON TITLE COMMITMENT PCT25114W4 ISSUED BY WESTCOR LAND TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY, EFFECTIVE NOVEMBER 16, 2017. 7. ANY PERSON WHO KNOWINGLY REMOVES, ALTERS OR DEFACES ANY PUBLIC LAND SURVEY MONUMENT OR LAND BOUNDARY MONUMENT OR ACCESSORY COMMITS A CLASS TWO (2) MISDEMEANOR PURSUANT TO SECTION 18-4-508 OF THE COLORADO REVISED STATUTES. 8. ALL DIMENSIONS AND COURSES ARE AS MEASURED IN THE FIELD UNLESS DENOTED IN PARENTHESIS, WHICH DENOTE THE BOUNDARIES OF RECORD ON THE ORIGINAL PLAT OF THE FIRST AMENDED SUBDIVISION EXEMPTION PLAT AND 1041 HAZARD REVIEW SITE PLAN OF CHAPARRAL ASPEN RECORDED OCTOBER 15, 2002 IN PLAT BOOK 62 AT PAGE 101 AS RECEPTION NO. 473441, AN IMPROVEMENT SURVEY PREPARED BY HIGH COUNTRY ENGINEERING, INC. DATED NOVEMBER 13, 2006 AND CORNERS FOUND IN PLACE AS SHOWN. COUNTY, STATE OF COLORADO. 9. THE WORD "CERTIFY" AS SHOWN AND USED HEREON MEANS AN EXPRESSION OF PROFESSIONAL OPINION REGARDING THE FACTS OF THE SURVEY, AS BASED UPON THE EVIDENCE PRESENTED HEREON, AND DOES NOT CONSTITUTE A WARRANTY OR GUARANTEE, EXPRESSED OR IMPLIED. 10. NOTICE: THIS PLAT AND THE INFORMATION SHOWN HEREON MAY NOT BE USED FOR ANY ADDITIONAL OR EXTENDED PURPOSE BEYOND THAT FOR WHICH IT WAS INTENDED AND MAY NOT BE USED BY ANY PARTIES OTHER THAN THOSE TO WHICH IT IS CERTIFIED. THIS DOCUMENT AND THE WORK IT REPRESENTS IS THE PROPERTY OF HIGH COUNTRY ENGINEERING, INC. NO PART OF THIS DOCUMENT MAY BE STORED, REPRODUCED, DISTRIBUTED OR USED TO PREPARE DERIVATIVE PRODUCTS WITHOUT PRIOR WRITTEN PERMISSION. AN ORIGINAL SEAL AND ORIGINAL SIGNATURE IS REQUIRED TO VALIDATE THIS DOCUMENT AND IS EXCLUSIVE TO HIGH COUNTRY ENGINEERING, INC. AND THE OWNER(S) OF RECORD AS OF THIS DATE, OF THE PROPERTY DELINEATED HEREON AND THE SUBJECT OF THE SURVEY. A LAND SURVEYING AND MAPPING COMPANY PO BOX 614 - 529 S. WILD HORSE DRIVE NEW CASTLE, COLORADO 81647 (970) 984-0474 www.truenorthcolorado.com TRUE NORTH COLORADO LLC. A LAND SURVEYING AND MAPPING COMPANY PO BOX 614 - 529 S. WILD HORSE DRIVE NEW CASTLE, COLORADO 81647 (970) 984-0474 www.truenorthcolorado.com TRUE NORTH COLORADO LLC.A LAND SURVEYING AND MAPPING COMPANYPO BOX 614 - 529 S. WILD HORSE DRIVENEW CASTLE, COLORADO 81647(970) 984-0474www.truenorthcolorado.com SCHEDULE B PART II TITLE EXCEPTIONS: EXCEPTIONS 1 THROUGH 9 ARE STANDARD TITLE EXCEPTIONS. 10.) THIS PROPERTY IS SUBJECT TO EXCEPTIONS AND RESERVATIONS AS SET FORTH IN THE ACT AUTHORIZING THE ISSUANCE OF THE PATENT FOR THE CITY AND TOWNSITE OF ASPEN, DATED JANUARY 29, 1897 AND RECORDED MARCH 1, 1897 IN BOOK 139 AT PAGE 216 AS RECEPTION NO. 060156. 11.) THIS PROPERTY IS SUBJECT TO TERMS, CONDITIONS, PROVISIONS, AGREEMENTS AND OBLIGATIONS SPECIFIED UNDER AN ORDINANCE ACCEPTING A MAP ENTITLED "OFFICIAL MAP OF THE CITY OF ASPEN, PITKIN COUNTY, STATE OF COLORADO," AS THE OFFICIAL MAP OF THE CITY OF ASPEN: PROVIDING FOR DEDICATION OF ALL STREETS AND ALLEYS, EXCEPT SUCH STREETS AND ALLEYS HERETOFORE VACATED: AND PROVIDING FOR THE FILING OF SAID MAP, FIELD NOTES, AND SUPPLEMENTAL PLATS WITH THE CLERK AND RECORDER FOR PITKIN COUNTY (ORDINANCE NO. 6, SERIES OF 1959) DATED NOVEMBER 16, 1959, AND RECORDED DECEMBER 18, 1959, AS RECEPTION NO. 109043. 12.) THIS PROPERTY IS SUBJECT TO TERMS, CONDITIONS, PROVISIONS, AGREEMENTS AND OBLIGATIONS SPECIFIED UNDER ORDINANCE NO. 45 (SERIES OF 2006) RECORDED MARCH 28, 2007, AS RECEPTION NO. 535861. HISTORIC DESIGNATION. 13.) DRIVEWAY ENCROACHMENT, ENCROACHMENT OF WOOD RETAINING WALLS AND ENCROACHMENT OF RAILROAD TIE WALL, AS SHOWN ON THE IMPROVEMENT SURVEY PLAT, PROVIDED BY TRUE NORTH COLORADO, DATED JANUARY 18, 2019 AS PROJECT NO. 2019-104. 14.) THIS PROPERTY IS SUBJECT TO ANY EXISTING LEASES OR TENANCIES, AND ANY AND ALL PARTIES CLAIMING BY, THROUGH OR UNDER SAID LESSEES. TREE TYPE SIZE DRIP TREE CHART 1 2 30"40' 16"32' CONIFEROUS CONIFEROUS 3 22"32'CONIFEROUS 4 20"30' 5 6 6"12' 7 8" 8 16'9 10 40"40'CONIFEROUS11 12 ASPEN 13 ASPEN 14 ASPEN 15 ASPEN 16 SCALE: 1" = 500' 16"32'ASPEN CONIFEROUS 24"30'CONIFEROUS ASPEN ASPEN ASPEN 16' 16' 8" 8"ASPEN 16"32'ASPEN 8"16' 6"12' 8"16' 8"16' ZONING: CITY OF ASPEN LAND USE CODE: R-6 SETBACKS FRONT YARD: PRINCIPAL BUILDINGS: 10 FEET ACCESSORY BUILDINGS: 15 FEET REAR YARD: PRINCIPAL BUILDINGS: 10 FEET PRINCIPAL BUILDING USED SOLELY AS GARAGE: 5 FEET ACCESSORY BUILDINGS: 5 FEET SIDE YARD: MINIMUM: 5 FEET 10 FEET, PLUS 1 FOOT FOR EACH ADDITIONAL 300 SQUARE FEET OF GROSS LOT AREA, TO A MAXIMUM OF 15 FEET OF TOTAL SIDE YARD W. HY M A N A V E N U E W. HOP K I N S A V E N U E MAIN S T R E E T3RD STREET2ND STREET1ST STREETSITE N N SCALE: 1/8" = 1'-0" 1 Architectural Site Plan A101 • HPC Granted a 7.4' combined side yard set back at Final 2022 • Requesting 5.4' Combined side yard setback at Susbtantial 2023 (East @ 2.4 + West @ 3). Change requested given new plumb retaining wall @ St Moritz at 2' from the property line (leaving 5' between the 6' retaining wall and the single story garage). HPC is the decision making body for the variance. Path lighting exists in the rear of the chalet. The monument has been removed. Two path lights in the front of the chalet (on the 3' path) as per L.2.002. Cut sheet are on L.2.002. Lighting conforms to revised/draft COA 90% Draft exterior lighting ordinance. Narrowed entry path to 3'-0" Landscape, Civil & Architectural show 2x 2 strips (gravel fines) with grass in between. All railroad ties removed. Apparent encroachment in South East corner of the property removed. 312 W Hyman to seed mix (fescue) current driveway, except a single two-strip for parking. 27 March 2023 SHEET TITLE INTEGRATED DESIGN TEAM PROJECT NO: MODEL FILE: DRAWN BY: COPYRIGHT: SHEET 42 A101 DO Jeffrey H Woodruff 312_W_Hyman_04042023.pln Project No. 116 /Users/jeffrey/Documents/Cloud Hill/312 West Hyman/312_W_Hyman_04042023.plnPowder Day Skiiing, LLC, David A Tarrab Mees Driveway Options 312 W Hyman Ave 312 W Hyman Ave Lots P+Q, Block 46 Aspen CO 81611 USA/ Pitkin County UGB, City of Aspen 312 W Hyman Ave Aspen CO 81611 USA Account # R000145 Parcel ID # 273512464006 Landscape Architect Jennifer M. Dolecki-Smith, RLA Escape Garden Design, LLC Civil Grading and Drainage Jay Engstrom, P.E. Crystal River Civil, LLC Structural Engineer Brian Rossiter, P.E. bwr.pe Contractor COA- HPO Site Visit08/22/21 Jeffrey H. Woodruff AIA, LEED AP Cloud Hill Design, LLC Snowmass CO 81654 USA COA- HPC Conceptual02/26/22 COA- HPC Conceptual04/27/22 COA- HPC Final07/27/22 COA- City Council Call Up10/12/22 COA- HPC Final04/12/23 1,227 sq ft 38 sq ft A A B B C C D D E E 4 4 3 3 2 2 1 1 1.55 5 ' 2.40 6 ' 11.6 8 ' 5.00 1 ' 3'-0" 2'18.24'14.414'314.25 sq ft 28.5 sq ft Proposed fence at the 5' side setback and 5' rear setback, lined on the South with shrubs, see landscaping plan St Moritz R e t a i n i n g w a l l ( n e w , plum and 2 ' f r o m p r o p e r t y l i n e ) , approx. 6' h i g h Removal of T r e e # 2 Removal of T r e e # 1 Existing dry well With new p l u m r e t a i n i n g w a l l , structure is 7 . 0 0 1 ' f r o m t h e nearest str u c t u r e 8" CMU w a l l , d e s i g n U 9 0 4 , exceeds 1 h r f i r e r a t i n g , f u l l y grouted bel o w g r a d e , a s p e r struct. Requesting c o m b i n e d 5 . 4 ' Setback as p e r n e w p l u m b 6 ' concrete w a l l . E EG OS W1 2 3 4 5 678 9 10 11 121314 15 16790479037902 7901 7901 7902 790179 0 2 7902 790379 0 3 10' R E A R S E T B A C K - P R I N C I P A L B U I L D I N G 5' R E A R S E T B A C K - P R I N C I P A L B U I L D I N G U S E D A S G A R A G E & AC C E S S O R Y B U I L D I N G 5' MINIMUM SIDE SETBACK10' F R O N T S E T B A C K PRI N C I P A L B U I L D I N G 15' F R O N T S E T B A C K ACC E S S O R Y B U I L D I N G 312 West Hyman Garage F.F.E. = 7902.86 312 West Hyman "Bedroom" F.F.E. = 7901.31 F.F.E. = 7901.36' F.F.E. = 7901.36' F.F.E. = 7901.33' mech. #1, 38 sq. ft./ #2, hw, ws 5' side 42" w x 51" h x 17" deep cshp/12" AFF rack mounted, with architectural louvers SCALE: 1/8" = 1'-0" 1 Architectural Site Plan A101 DO 2 One Long - works A101 DO 3 Two short- not preferred A101 DO 4 Short and Long- works A101 DO SHEET TITLE INTEGRATED DESIGN TEAM PROJECT NO: MODEL FILE: DRAWN BY: COPYRIGHT: SHEET 42 A103 Jeffrey H Woodruff 312_W_Hyman_03312023.pln Project No. 116 /Users/jeffrey/Documents/Cloud Hill/Rainbow/structural/312_W_Hyman_03312023.plnPowder Day Skiiing, LLC, David A Tarrab Mees Main Level Proposed Plan 312 W Hyman Ave 312 W Hyman Ave Lots P+Q, Block 46 Aspen CO 81611 USA/ Pitkin County UGB, City of Aspen 312 W Hyman Ave Aspen CO 81611 USA Account # R000145 Parcel ID # 273512464006 Landscape Architect Jennifer M. Dolecki-Smith, RLA Escape Garden Design, LLC Civil Grading and Drainage Jay Engstrom, P.E. Crystal River Civil, LLC Structural Engineer Brian Rossiter, P.E. bwr.pe Contractor COA- HPO Site Visit08/22/21 Jeffrey H. Woodruff AIA, LEED AP Cloud Hill Design, LLC Snowmass CO 81654 USA COA- HPC Conceptual02/26/22 COA- HPC Conceptual04/27/22 COA- HPC Final07/27/22 COA- City Council Call Up10/12/22 COA- HPC Final04/12/23 38 sq ft W 6E4'-0" 2'-6"Sill 3'-8"W 5E3'-8" 3'-10"Sill 4'-0"W 2E2'-8" 3'-10"Sill 5'-7 5/64"D 1E8'-0" 3'-0" W 4S2'-8"3'-10"Sill 4'-5" Nook2'-8"2'-1"Sill 4'-5" D 3S6'-5"7'-9"D 2S6'-5"7'-9"D 4S 6'-5"7'-9"D 5S 6'-5"7'-9"D G A R 1 8'-0"13'-6"D G A R 2 6'-9"5'-0"W 6W2'-8" 3'-10"Sill 5'-0"W 5W2'-8" 3'-10"Sill 5'-0"D 6W7'-6" 3'-6"W 6E4'-0" 2'-0"Sill 3'-6"D 3E2'-9" 3'-0"D1 L16'-8" 3'-0" D M1 8'-0"3'-0"D B6 8'-0"2'-0"D B48'-0" 2'-6"D B28'-0" 2'-6"D B38'-0" 2'-6"D B58'-0" 2'-6" D B78'-0"4'-0"D B18'-0" 2'-6" D 2N 8'-0"2'-4"D 2N 8'-0"2'-4"W G24'-0" 4'-3"Sill 5'-9 13/64"W G 3 4'-0"2'-0"Sill 5 ' - 9 1 3 / 6 4 " W G 1 4'-0"4'-3"Sill 5 ' - 8 " D G 1 8'-0"3'-0"D M18'-0" 2'-8"D M 28'-0" 2'-8" D 2N 7'-6"6'-0"D 1N 7'-6"6'-0"A B C D E 4 4 3 3 2 2 1 1 F/R3 A405 16'-0 3 / 6 4 " 32'-7"23'-9"16'-3"1'-6 2 1 / 3 2 " 2'-4 7 / 8 "5'-0"11'-8 5 / 3 2 " 8'-2"10'-2"10'-0"4'-3"9'-0"11'-9"19'-3"32'-7"2'-0"5'-6 1/4"3'-5 2 7 / 6 4 "21'-4 11/64"2'-0" 5'-0" 3'-0" 100' = 7901.31' 100' 100' = 7901.31' 3 Z004 1 A301 2 A301 2 A211 1 A211 3 A211 4 A211 2 A402 6 A401 4 A403 2 A404 1 A408 1 A407 Trees protected #3, #4, and # 5 to NE Proposed fence at the 5' side setback and 5' rear setback, lined on the South with shrubs, see landscaping plan St Moritz R e t a i n i n g w a l l ( n e w , plum and 2 ' f r o m p r o p e r t y l i n e ) , approx. 6' h i g h Removal of T r e e # 2 Removal of T r e e # 1 Existing dry well With new p l u m r e t a i n i n g w a l l , structure is 7 . 0 0 1 ' f r o m t h e nearest str u c t u r e 8" CMU w a l l , d e s i g n U 9 0 4 , exceeds 1 h r f i r e r a t i n g , f u l l y grouted bel o w g r a d e , a s p e r struct. Requesting c o m b i n e d 5 . 4 ' Setback as p e r n e w p l u m b 6 ' concrete w a l l .W-3W-3W-3W-3W-3W-4W-4 W-4 UP bedroom #2 bathe #3 mechanical(14 sq ft)trash, c o m p o s t , r e c y c l i n g bathe #2 closet boot c u b b i e s & be n c h bedroom #3 main entry electric meters (2) gas & radon (to be re/ moved) egress egress egress entry w/d louvered door 1/2 bathe cabinet 312 West Hyman Garage F.F.E. = 7902.86 312 West Hyman "Bedroom" F.F.E. = 7901.31 F.F.E. = 7901.36' F.F.E. = 7901.36' F.F.E. = 7901.33' niche mirror benchmud hooks bench hall closetopen shelvescounterfireplace appliance old 100, cubbies mech. #1, 38 sq. ft./ #2, hw, ws 42" w x 51" h x 17" deep cshp/12" AFF rack mounted, with architectural louvers 1 A300 3 H3 3 H4 1 Z003 2 A300 1 A400 Smoke Alarms R314.2.1 New Construction- provided in dwelling units R314.3 Location in each sleeping room, outside each separate sleeping area in the immediate vicinity of the bedrooms Required in uninhabitable attics R314.3.1 Installation near cooking appliances R314.5 Combination alarms- combination smoke and carbon monoxide alarms shall be permitted (in lieu of smoke alarms) Carbon Monoxide Alarms R315.2.1 Carbon Monoxide New Construction- required due to attached garage with an opening that communicates with the dwelling unit. R315.3 Location- in dwelling units, outside of each separate sleeping area in the vicinity of the bedrooms. N SCALE: 1/4" = 1'-0" 1 First Floor A103 SCALE: 1/4" = 1'-0" 2 Code Information A103 27 March 2023 SHEET TITLE INTEGRATED DESIGN TEAM PROJECT NO: MODEL FILE: DRAWN BY: COPYRIGHT: SHEET 43 A104 Jeffrey H Woodruff 312_W_Hyman_03312023.pln Project No. 116 /Users/jeffrey/Documents/Cloud Hill/Rainbow/structural/312_W_Hyman_03312023.plnPowder Day Skiiing, LLC, David A Tarrab Mees Second Level Proposed Plan 312 W Hyman Ave 312 W Hyman Ave Lots P+Q, Block 46 Aspen CO 81611 USA/ Pitkin County UGB, City of Aspen 312 W Hyman Ave Aspen CO 81611 USA Account # R000145 Parcel ID # 273512464006 Landscape Architect Jennifer M. Dolecki-Smith, RLA Escape Garden Design, LLC Civil Grading and Drainage Jay Engstrom, P.E. Crystal River Civil, LLC Structural Engineer Brian Rossiter, P.E. bwr.pe Contractor COA- HPO Site Visit08/22/21 Jeffrey H. Woodruff AIA, LEED AP Cloud Hill Design, LLC Snowmass CO 81654 USA COA- HPC Conceptual02/26/22 COA- HPC Conceptual04/27/22 COA- HPC Final07/27/22 COA- City Council Call Up10/12/22 COA- HPC Final04/12/23W 11E4'-8" 7'-0"Sill 1'-7 47/64"W 15W3'-6" 6'-0"Sill 3'-0"W 16W3'-6" 6'-0"Sill 3'-0"W 12S5'-0"7'-0"Sill 1'-4" W 14S5'-0"7'-0"Sill 1'-4" D 22E 6'-6"3'-0"D PB28'-0" 3'-0" D PB4 8'-0"2'-6"W 7N 4'-0"1'-2"Sill 3'-0" W 8N 4'-0"3'-0"Sill 3'-0" W 9N 4'-0"3'-0"Sill 3'-0" D PB1 8'-0"2'-10"D PB38'-0"2'-6"D PB58'-0"2'-0"D P18'-0" 2'-0"W 4E4'-0" 2'-6"Sill 3'-0"W 3E4'-0" 2'-6"Sill 3'-0"D 1E7'-0" 6'-0" A A B B C C D D E E 4 4 3 3 2 2 1 1 F DWRE3 Z004 1 A301 2 A301 2 A211 8'-2"10'-2"10'-0"4'-3"9'-0"11'-9"19'-3"32'-7"40'-0"1'-6"3'-6"1'-6"4'-0"9'-4"11'-6"9'-3" 9'-3" 1 A300 3 H3 3 H4 1 Z003 2 A300 1 A410 1 A411 1 A412 2 A413 3 A414 W-1 W-1W-1 W-1W-1kitchen bathe #1 living room down deck fireplace bedroom 1 closetdown egress pantry open to entry below slat art wall 180" = 15' 112" = 9' - 4" Smoke Alarms R314.2.1 New Construction- provided in dwelling units R314.3 Location in each sleeping room, outside each separate sleeping area in the immediate vicinity of the bedrooms Required in uninhabitable attics R314.3.1 Installation near cooking appliances R314.5 Combination alarms- combination smoke and carbon monoxide alarms shall be permitted (in lieu of smoke alarms) Carbon Monoxide Alarms R315.2.1 Carbon Monoxide New Construction- required due to attached garage with an opening that communicates with the dwelling unit. R315.3 Location- in dwelling units, outside of each separate sleeping area in the vicinity of the bedrooms. N SCALE: 1/4" = 1'-0" 1 Second Floor A104 SCALE: 1/4" = 1'-0" 2 Code Information A104 27 March 2023 SHEET TITLE INTEGRATED DESIGN TEAM PROJECT NO: MODEL FILE: DRAWN BY: COPYRIGHT: SHEET 44 A105 Jeffrey H Woodruff 312_W_Hyman_03312023.pln Project No. 116 /Users/jeffrey/Documents/Cloud Hill/Rainbow/structural/312_W_Hyman_03312023.plnPowder Day Skiiing, LLC, David A Tarrab Mees Roof Plan Proposed 312 W Hyman Ave 312 W Hyman Ave Lots P+Q, Block 46 Aspen CO 81611 USA/ Pitkin County UGB, City of Aspen 312 W Hyman Ave Aspen CO 81611 USA Account # R000145 Parcel ID # 273512464006 Landscape Architect Jennifer M. Dolecki-Smith, RLA Escape Garden Design, LLC Civil Grading and Drainage Jay Engstrom, P.E. Crystal River Civil, LLC Structural Engineer Brian Rossiter, P.E. bwr.pe Contractor COA- HPO Site Visit08/22/21 Jeffrey H. Woodruff AIA, LEED AP Cloud Hill Design, LLC Snowmass CO 81654 USA COA- HPC Conceptual02/26/22 COA- HPC Conceptual04/27/22 COA- HPC Final07/27/22 COA- City Council Call Up10/12/22 COA- HPC Final04/12/23W SKY15'-10 1/2" 1'-10 1/2"Sill 1'-6 17/64"W SKY25'-10 1/2" 1'-10 1/2"Sill 1'-6 17/64"A B C D E 4 4 3 3 2 2 1 1 1' Overhang, typ. Solar as per onsite Energy Requirements 16x 64.7 x 47.4 x 1.6" Radon (roof penetration) to be replaced (interior, update to slab (penetrations), existing roof penetration to be used) for relocated fan/vent Vent (Vent Stack) Vent (Vent Stack) Former Boiler Flu (roof penetration), will be vent stack 6" diameter duct Match existing, new construction concrete fiber cement over steel frame Snow Clips (health and safety), As per City of Aspen R910 and Section 1513 Protected entry, as per Ord. 40-2016 Snow Clips (health and safety), As per City of Aspen R910 and Section 1513 Snow Clips (health and safety), As per City of Aspen R910 and Section 1513 Protected entry, as per Ord. 40-2016 Gutters and downspouts as per Civil Grading and Drainage (Existing) Gutters to be replaced and installed as per mfr. as per Civil Grading and Drainage Gutters as per Civil Grading and Drainage, required by City of Aspen at entry, recommended by COA Historic Guidelines, required by Architect Gutters and downspouts as per Civil Grading and Drainage (Existing) Gutters to be replaced and installed as per mfr. as per Civil Grading and Drainage 1' Garage Overhang, typ. Outline of 2nd floor (below), extent of fascia 4:12 4:12 3: 12Slope 3:12 Slope 3:12 Slope 6:12 Note: Today this is a cold roof with attic vents. The current attic vents and screens are in disrepair (upon viewing from the attic). We are removing the dropped ceiling, removing the attic vents and exposing the rafters, adding insulation and updating the light and vent in a Chalet style. The attic vent(s) will be converted to fenestration of the same size rough opening, (a hopper for light and vent, will not interfere with the south facing Juliet balcony). U-Value for horizontal fenestration = .50 as per IECC 2021 As per currently adopted IRC Section R910 Snow shed design. Roofs shall be designed so that they do not shed ice and snow onto adjoining properties or potentially occupied areas such as a walkway, stairway, alley, deck, pedestrian and vehicular exit from buildings or areas where there is potential for personal injury or property damage and areas directly above or in front of gas utility or electric utility meters. (Ord. 40-2016) Section 1513 Snow shed design. Roofs shall be designed so that they do not shed ice and snow onto adjacent properties and potentially occupied areas such as a walkway, stairway, alley, deck, pedestrian and vehicular exit from buildings or areas where there is potential for personal injury or property damage and areas directly above or in front of gas utility or electric utility meters. 3:12 Slope Note: Gutters exist on the East fascia, as per City of Aspen adopted building code, they were not properly installed and jeopardize the historic decorative trim. Install as per mfr. with blocking toenailed to the rafters, as per arch. A dry well holds run-off from the east gable. The Trex deck drains to the dry well to the south. The addition of gutters on the west gable and a new dry well to the North of the structure bring the historic structure into compliance with the city of Aspen adopted building code (protection of occupants at entry and on-site capture and dispersion of water events). Without gutters, laminar flow means rain and snowmelt are degrading the historic fascia and shedding water to the base and foundation, without proper drainage; negating the 24" surrounding no- planting recital. Gutters and snow guards are required as per city of aspen 2016 Ord .40. Note on Snow Clips. Arch prefer snow pipes for snow load at elevation, re: health and safety as per R910 and Section 1513 Re: snow clips from mfr.; no recommendation for layout for a pad-style snow guard on membrane roofing for projects with such a high snow load. However, one option for membrane roofing, the PD90. Install this pad down into the structural deck below the membrane roofing Layout and pattern they would be at archs recommendation- 3 rows 24" OC, with middle row offset by 12" Would prefer greater visual impact and better health safety, but will acquiesce- with: gutters on East and West, A Style Box gutter, downspouts and elbows (to match fascia) and three rows of snow clips, PD90 N SCALE: 1/4" = 1'-0" 1 Roof Plan A105 2 07 Box-Style-A-1 A105 3 West Decorative Fascia is < 10" Deep A105 4 East Decorative Fascia and Gutter A105 6kw solar electric system for (2) separate meters based on 16 panels on the garage. With 10% shade loss and 15% snow loss for the year the system will produce about 14,862kWh. For the batteries= (5). The homeowner’s goals are to have the batteries supplying power for both panels during a grid outage for hours or days during the winter, hence the larger size.During the winter with snow coverage, the panels would not produce much to replenish the batteries once they are drained. Electric car charger hook up as per City of Aspen. Roof is a Zinc Grey Standing Seam Tee-Panel (profile) Metal Roof by Berridge Manufacturing Company. Gutters, downspouts, downspout clips and elbows are all Zinc Grey. Fascia is Zinc Grey. (The main chalet is a black asphaltic roof and a city heat island. The garage will be Zinc Grey and the solar panels will absorb the solar radiation). Complying with Chapter 7 Historic Preservation Guidelines Gutters, Downspouts, Snowstops, and Snow Fences Gutters and downspouts are used to divert water away from a structure. Without this drainage system, water may splash off the roof onto exterior walls and run along the foundation of the building. Snowstops and snow fences are used to protect inhabitants and the building from the sudden snow avalanches that rip off architectural details and can cause serious injury. Gutters can be seen in some 19th century photos of historic buildings and are more common on AspenModern structures. Overall, the visual impact of these functional elements should be minimized. 7.10 Design gutters so that their visibility on the structure is minimized to the extent possible. • Downspouts should be placed in locations that are not visible from the street if possible, or in locations that do not obscure architectural detailing on the building. • The material used for the gutters should be in character with the style of the building. Complying with IBC IBC 1504.6.1Gutter securement for low-slope roofs. Gutters that are used to secure the perimeter edge of the roof membrane on low-slope (less than 2:12 slope) built-up, modified bitumen, and single-ply roofs, shall be designed, constructed and installed to resist wind loads in accordance with Section 1609 and shall be tested in accordance with Test Methods G-1 and G-2 of SPRI GT-1. Character of gutter, downspout, downspout straps and elbows Style of Gutter: Box Style A1, 24 Gage Galvalume, Box Downspout, downspout straps and Elbow in 3” x 4” in 24 Gage Galvalume, color to match decorative trim. (Today the brown decorative fascia has a brown gutter in ~K style on the East decorative fascia. The existing gutters to be removed, and re-installed with Box Style A1 to match the decorative trim. Blocking should be added (interior face of the decorative trim, toe nailed to the rafters, painted to match and guarddog 2” (or sim.) screws should used to install the new gutters (piercing the decorative trim and the newly installed blocking). Otherwise the existing (east) gutters will shear from the decorative trim. Existing conditions The decorative fascia is not covered by the current East gutters. The former owner installed gutters without accounting for the run off from the west side of the site and did not file a construction management plan; so the water is imperiling the fascia, the structure and not handled onsite as per City Engineering. The installed gutters on the east side of the building threaten the decorative fascia. Gutters, Box Style A measure 3” deep/high and 4” wide (minimum as per mfr.) West: The interior measurement of the fascia on the West is 10 1/4” deep/high. East: The east gutters will not cover the decorative fascia, which appear narrower at ~8” deep. The east gutters, as currently installed do not cover the decorative facia, but are a building and health and safety concern (all hardware daylights, shiners, typ). 27 March 2023 SHEET TITLE INTEGRATED DESIGN TEAM PROJECT NO: MODEL FILE: DRAWN BY: COPYRIGHT: SHEET 45 A106 Jeffrey H Woodruff 312_W_Hyman_03312023.pln Project No. 116 /Users/jeffrey/Documents/Cloud Hill/Rainbow/structural/312_W_Hyman_03312023.plnPowder Day Skiiing, LLC, David A Tarrab Mees Main Level Existing Plan 312 W Hyman Ave 312 W Hyman Ave Lots P+Q, Block 46 Aspen CO 81611 USA/ Pitkin County UGB, City of Aspen 312 W Hyman Ave Aspen CO 81611 USA Account # R000145 Parcel ID # 273512464006 Landscape Architect Jennifer M. Dolecki-Smith, RLA Escape Garden Design, LLC Civil Grading and Drainage Jay Engstrom, P.E. Crystal River Civil, LLC Structural Engineer Brian Rossiter, P.E. bwr.pe Contractor COA- HPO Site Visit08/22/21 Jeffrey H. Woodruff AIA, LEED AP Cloud Hill Design, LLC Snowmass CO 81654 USA COA- HPC Conceptual02/26/22 COA- HPC Conceptual04/27/22 COA- HPC Final07/27/22 COA- City Council Call Up10/12/22 COA- HPC Final04/12/23 41 sq ftD-114a7'-0" 3'-0" D-117a7'-0"3'-0"W-gg 4'-6"3'-0"Sill 4'-8 3/4"W-gg2'-8" 3'-10"Sill 5'-5"W-gg2'-8" 3'-10"Sill 5'-0"W-gg2'-8" 3'-10"Sill 5'-0"D-119a7'-6" 5'-10" W-gg2'-8"3'-10"Sill 4'-5 7/32" W-gg2'-8"2'-1"Sill 4'-5 7/32" D-120a 6'-5"8'-3"D-120a 6'-5"8'-3"D-116a7'-0"2'-9"W-gg2'-8" 3'-10"Sill 5'-5"D-116a8'-0" 3'-0" D-116a 7'-0"2'-9"A A B B C C D D E E 4 4 3 3 2 2 1 1 W/D W/D 6'-10" 2 Z003 1 Z004 2 Z004 1 H6 KITCHEN BATHROOM BEDROOM LIVING ROOM F.P. STORAGE BEDROOM CLOSET STORAGE GARAGE MECHANICAL STORAGE GARAGE UP up N SCALE: 1/4" = 1'-0" 1 First Floor Existing A106 27 March 2023 SHEET TITLE INTEGRATED DESIGN TEAM PROJECT NO: MODEL FILE: DRAWN BY: COPYRIGHT: SHEET 46 A107 Jeffrey H Woodruff 312_W_Hyman_03312023.pln Project No. 116 /Users/jeffrey/Documents/Cloud Hill/Rainbow/structural/312_W_Hyman_03312023.plnPowder Day Skiiing, LLC, David A Tarrab Mees Second Level Existing Plan 312 W Hyman Ave 312 W Hyman Ave Lots P+Q, Block 46 Aspen CO 81611 USA/ Pitkin County UGB, City of Aspen 312 W Hyman Ave Aspen CO 81611 USA Account # R000145 Parcel ID # 273512464006 Landscape Architect Jennifer M. Dolecki-Smith, RLA Escape Garden Design, LLC Civil Grading and Drainage Jay Engstrom, P.E. Crystal River Civil, LLC Structural Engineer Brian Rossiter, P.E. bwr.pe Contractor COA- HPO Site Visit08/22/21 Jeffrey H. Woodruff AIA, LEED AP Cloud Hill Design, LLC Snowmass CO 81654 USA COA- HPC Conceptual02/26/22 COA- HPC Conceptual04/27/22 COA- HPC Final07/27/22 COA- City Council Call Up10/12/22 COA- HPC Final04/12/23 W-gg 3'-0"3'-9"Sill 3'-4 47/64" W-gg 4'-6"3'-0"Sill 2'-10 57/64"W-gg3'-2" 3'-9"Sill 3'-1 47/64"W-gg4'-8" 7'-0"Sill 1'-7 47/64"W-gg2'-6"2'-0"Sill -3"W-gg3'-6" 6'-0"Sill 3'-0"W-gg3'-6" 6'-0"Sill 3'-0"W-gg5'-0"7'-0"Sill 1'-3 47/64" W-gg5'-0"7'-0"Sill 1'-5 31/64" D-121a 6'-6"3'-0"W-gg 2'-6"2'-0"Sill -3" A A B B C C D D E E 4 4 3 3 2 2 1 1 2 Z003 1 Z004 2 Z004 1 H6 11'-5 1/16" KITCHEN BATH BEDROOM LIVING ROOM F.P. BEDROOM CLOSET DOWN DOWN N SCALE: 1/4" = 1'-0" 1 Second Floor Existing A107 27 March 2023 SHEET TITLE INTEGRATED DESIGN TEAM PROJECT NO: MODEL FILE: DRAWN BY: COPYRIGHT: SHEET 47 A108 Jeffrey H Woodruff 312_W_Hyman_03312023.pln Project No. 116 /Users/jeffrey/Documents/Cloud Hill/Rainbow/structural/312_W_Hyman_03312023.plnPowder Day Skiiing, LLC, David A Tarrab Mees Roof Plan Existing 312 W Hyman Ave 312 W Hyman Ave Lots P+Q, Block 46 Aspen CO 81611 USA/ Pitkin County UGB, City of Aspen 312 W Hyman Ave Aspen CO 81611 USA Account # R000145 Parcel ID # 273512464006 Landscape Architect Jennifer M. Dolecki-Smith, RLA Escape Garden Design, LLC Civil Grading and Drainage Jay Engstrom, P.E. Crystal River Civil, LLC Structural Engineer Brian Rossiter, P.E. bwr.pe Contractor COA- HPO Site Visit08/22/21 Jeffrey H. Woodruff AIA, LEED AP Cloud Hill Design, LLC Snowmass CO 81654 USA COA- HPC Conceptual02/26/22 COA- HPC Conceptual04/27/22 COA- HPC Final07/27/22 COA- City Council Call Up10/12/22 COA- HPC Final04/12/23 A A B B C C D D E E 4 4 3 3 2 2 1 1 2 Z003 1 Z004 2 Z004 1 H6 Vent Radon (roof penetration) Vent Former Boiler Flu (roof penetration) Existing chimney, stucco over concrete blook Existing gutters, downspouts and downspout straps No gutters exist today; I-Codes, engineering and City of Aspen issue (health and safety) 3:12 3:12 3:12 3:12 N SCALE: 1/4" = 1'-0" 1 Roof Existing A108 SCALE: 6" = 1'-0" 2 513 W. Hyman.5.19.22.279 A108 SCALE: 6" = 1'-0" 3 513 W. Hyman.5.19.22.240 A108 27 March 2023 SHEET TITLE INTEGRATED DESIGN TEAM PROJECT NO: MODEL FILE: DRAWN BY: COPYRIGHT: SHEET 48 A110 Jeffrey H Woodruff 312_W_Hyman_03312023.pln Project No. 116 /Users/jeffrey/Documents/Cloud Hill/Rainbow/structural/312_W_Hyman_03312023.plnPowder Day Skiiing, LLC, David A Tarrab Mees Main Level RCP 312 W Hyman Ave 312 W Hyman Ave Lots P+Q, Block 46 Aspen CO 81611 USA/ Pitkin County UGB, City of Aspen 312 W Hyman Ave Aspen CO 81611 USA Account # R000145 Parcel ID # 273512464006 Landscape Architect Jennifer M. Dolecki-Smith, RLA Escape Garden Design, LLC Civil Grading and Drainage Jay Engstrom, P.E. Crystal River Civil, LLC Structural Engineer Brian Rossiter, P.E. bwr.pe Contractor COA- HPO Site Visit08/22/21 Jeffrey H. Woodruff AIA, LEED AP Cloud Hill Design, LLC Snowmass CO 81654 USA COA- HPC Conceptual02/26/22 COA- HPC Conceptual04/27/22 COA- HPC Final07/27/22 COA- City Council Call Up10/12/22 COA- HPC Final04/12/23 W Smoke Detector CO Detector Can (IC Rated at Entry) Ceiling Fan Single Pole Switch Three Way Switch Linear LED (Under Counter) SM LED Exterior Light SM LED Area Light (Bathe) Wall Washer/bed luminaire Pendant (Ceiling Mounted) Track light/WW Dining Chandelier by Owner 38 sq ft A B C D E 4 4 3 3 2 2 1 1 1 A301 2 A301 42" w x 51" h x 17" deep cshp/12" AFF rack mounted, with architectural louvers 1 A300 2 A300 N SCALE: 1/4" = 1'-0" 1 Lighting Key A110 SCALE: 1/4" = 1'-0" 2 First Floor RCP A110 27 March 2023 SHEET TITLE INTEGRATED DESIGN TEAM PROJECT NO: MODEL FILE: DRAWN BY: COPYRIGHT: SHEET 49 A110 Jeffrey H Woodruff 312_W_Hyman_03312023.pln Project No. 116 /Users/jeffrey/Documents/Cloud Hill/Rainbow/structural/312_W_Hyman_03312023.plnPowder Day Skiiing, LLC, David A Tarrab Mees Second Level RCP 312 W Hyman Ave 312 W Hyman Ave Lots P+Q, Block 46 Aspen CO 81611 USA/ Pitkin County UGB, City of Aspen 312 W Hyman Ave Aspen CO 81611 USA Account # R000145 Parcel ID # 273512464006 Landscape Architect Jennifer M. Dolecki-Smith, RLA Escape Garden Design, LLC Civil Grading and Drainage Jay Engstrom, P.E. Crystal River Civil, LLC Structural Engineer Brian Rossiter, P.E. bwr.pe Contractor COA- HPO Site Visit08/22/21 Jeffrey H. Woodruff AIA, LEED AP Cloud Hill Design, LLC Snowmass CO 81654 USA COA- HPC Conceptual02/26/22 COA- HPC Conceptual04/27/22 COA- HPC Final07/27/22 COA- City Council Call Up10/12/22 COA- HPC Final04/12/23 W Smoke Detector CO Detector Can (IC Rated at Entry) Ceiling Fan Single Pole Switch Three Way Switch Linear LED (Under Counter) SM LED Exterior Light SM LED Area Light (Bathe) Wall Washer/bed luminaire Pendant (Ceiling Mounted) Track light/WW Dining Chandelier by Owner A A B B C C D D E E 4 4 3 3 2 2 1 1 1 A301 2 A301 1 A300 2 A300 N SCALE: 1/4" = 1'-0" 1 Lighting Key A110 SCALE: 1/4" = 1'-0" 2 Second Floor RCP A110 27 March 2023 SHEET TITLE INTEGRATED DESIGN TEAM PROJECT NO: MODEL FILE: DRAWN BY: COPYRIGHT: SHEET 50 A200 Jeffrey H Woodruff 312_W_Hyman_03312023.pln Project No. 116 /Users/jeffrey/Documents/Cloud Hill/Rainbow/structural/312_W_Hyman_03312023.plnPowder Day Skiiing, LLC, David A Tarrab Mees Elevations Proposed 312 W Hyman Ave 312 W Hyman Ave Lots P+Q, Block 46 Aspen CO 81611 USA/ Pitkin County UGB, City of Aspen 312 W Hyman Ave Aspen CO 81611 USA Account # R000145 Parcel ID # 273512464006 Landscape Architect Jennifer M. Dolecki-Smith, RLA Escape Garden Design, LLC Civil Grading and Drainage Jay Engstrom, P.E. Crystal River Civil, LLC Structural Engineer Brian Rossiter, P.E. bwr.pe Contractor COA- HPO Site Visit08/22/21 Jeffrey H. Woodruff AIA, LEED AP Cloud Hill Design, LLC Snowmass CO 81654 USA COA- HPC Conceptual02/26/22 COA- HPC Conceptual04/27/22 COA- HPC Final07/27/22 COA- City Council Call Up10/12/22 COA- HPC Final04/12/23 ±0" 1 First Floor ±0" 1 First Floor +9'-3" 2 Second Floor +9'-3" 2 Second Floor +18'-3" 3 Roof +18'-3" 3 Roof3'-9 63/64"11 45/64"New Wood Existing Wood New CMU Existing Wood Existing Synthetic Treads Rebuilt Stucco W 9N W 8N W 7N D 2N D 1N ±0" 1 First Floor +9'-3" 2 Second Floor +18'-3" 3 Roof Existing Wood Existing CMU New CMU New Wood Existing Asphalt New WoodNew Stucco New Skylights New Stucco, Match, typ New CMU Heat Pump, Louvered W 11E W 3E W SKY2 D 1E W 4E W 2E D 1ED 3E W 6E W G2 D GAR1D GAR2 SCALE: 1/4" = 1'-0" 1 North Elevation A200 SCALE: 1/4" = 1'-0" 2 East Elevation A200 27 March 2023 SHEET TITLE INTEGRATED DESIGN TEAM PROJECT NO: MODEL FILE: DRAWN BY: COPYRIGHT: SHEET 51 A201 Jeffrey H Woodruff 312_W_Hyman_03312023.pln Project No. 116 /Users/jeffrey/Documents/Cloud Hill/Rainbow/structural/312_W_Hyman_03312023.plnPowder Day Skiiing, LLC, David A Tarrab Mees Elevations Proposed 312 W Hyman Ave 312 W Hyman Ave Lots P+Q, Block 46 Aspen CO 81611 USA/ Pitkin County UGB, City of Aspen 312 W Hyman Ave Aspen CO 81611 USA Account # R000145 Parcel ID # 273512464006 Landscape Architect Jennifer M. Dolecki-Smith, RLA Escape Garden Design, LLC Civil Grading and Drainage Jay Engstrom, P.E. Crystal River Civil, LLC Structural Engineer Brian Rossiter, P.E. bwr.pe Contractor COA- HPO Site Visit08/22/21 Jeffrey H. Woodruff AIA, LEED AP Cloud Hill Design, LLC Snowmass CO 81654 USA COA- HPC Conceptual02/26/22 COA- HPC Conceptual04/27/22 COA- HPC Final07/27/22 COA- City Council Call Up10/12/22 COA- HPC Final04/12/23 ±0" 1 First Floor ±0" 1 First Floor +9'-3" 2 Second Floor +9'-3" 2 Second Floor +18'-3" 3 Roof +18'-3" 3 Roof Existing CMU Existing Wood W 14S D 22E W 12S W S7 W 4S D 4S D 3S D 2S D 5S wood clad hopper to replace (outmoded) attic vent, as per window schedule 312 Existing Garage Door New Slider (Behind) Existing Garage Door New Slider (Behind)Existing (garden) nook, not fenestration ±0" 1 First Floor +9'-3" 2 Second Floor +18'-3" 3 Roof 22'-1 5/16" 25'-0" 13'-6 15/32" Existing WoodNew Wood Existing Opening Existing Wood Existing CMU Existing CMU New Stucco New Standing Seam W G1 D G1 W 6E W 16W W 15W W SKY1 W 6W D 6W W 5W D 2S SCALE: 1/4" = 1'-0" 1 South Elevation A201 SCALE: 1/4" = 1'-0" 2 West Elevation A201 27 March 2023 SHEET TITLE INTEGRATED DESIGN TEAM PROJECT NO: MODEL FILE: DRAWN BY: COPYRIGHT: SHEET 52 A203 Jeffrey H Woodruff 312_W_Hyman_03312023.pln Project No. 116 /Users/jeffrey/Documents/Cloud Hill/Rainbow/structural/312_W_Hyman_03312023.plnPowder Day Skiiing, LLC, David A Tarrab Mees Existing Elevations 312 W Hyman Ave 312 W Hyman Ave Lots P+Q, Block 46 Aspen CO 81611 USA/ Pitkin County UGB, City of Aspen 312 W Hyman Ave Aspen CO 81611 USA Account # R000145 Parcel ID # 273512464006 Landscape Architect Jennifer M. Dolecki-Smith, RLA Escape Garden Design, LLC Civil Grading and Drainage Jay Engstrom, P.E. Crystal River Civil, LLC Structural Engineer Brian Rossiter, P.E. bwr.pe Contractor COA- HPO Site Visit08/22/21 Jeffrey H. Woodruff AIA, LEED AP Cloud Hill Design, LLC Snowmass CO 81654 USA COA- HPC Conceptual02/26/22 COA- HPC Conceptual04/27/22 COA- HPC Final07/27/22 COA- City Council Call Up10/12/22 COA- HPC Final04/12/23 ±0" 1 First Floor ±0" 1 First Floor +9'-3" 2 Second Floor +9'-3" 2 Second Floor +18'-3" 3 Roof +18'-3" 3 Roof ±0" 1 First Floor +9'-3" 2 Second Floor +18'-3" 3 Roof SCALE: 1/4" = 1'-0" 1 Existing North Elevation A203 SCALE: 1/4" = 1'-0" 2 Existing East Elevation A203 SCALE: 1:0.17 3 Existing South Photo A203 SCALE: 1:0.17 4 Existing East Photo A203 27 March 2023 SHEET TITLE INTEGRATED DESIGN TEAM PROJECT NO: MODEL FILE: DRAWN BY: COPYRIGHT: SHEET 53 A204 Jeffrey H Woodruff 312_W_Hyman_03312023.pln Project No. 116 /Users/jeffrey/Documents/Cloud Hill/Rainbow/structural/312_W_Hyman_03312023.plnPowder Day Skiiing, LLC, David A Tarrab Mees Existing Elevations 312 W Hyman Ave 312 W Hyman Ave Lots P+Q, Block 46 Aspen CO 81611 USA/ Pitkin County UGB, City of Aspen 312 W Hyman Ave Aspen CO 81611 USA Account # R000145 Parcel ID # 273512464006 Landscape Architect Jennifer M. Dolecki-Smith, RLA Escape Garden Design, LLC Civil Grading and Drainage Jay Engstrom, P.E. Crystal River Civil, LLC Structural Engineer Brian Rossiter, P.E. bwr.pe Contractor COA- HPO Site Visit08/22/21 Jeffrey H. Woodruff AIA, LEED AP Cloud Hill Design, LLC Snowmass CO 81654 USA COA- HPC Conceptual02/26/22 COA- HPC Conceptual04/27/22 COA- HPC Final07/27/22 COA- City Council Call Up10/12/22 COA- HPC Final04/12/23 ±0" 1 First Floor ±0" 1 First Floor +9'-3" 2 Second Floor +9'-3" 2 Second Floor +18'-3" 3 Roof +18'-3" 3 Roof 18'-3 1 / 2 " 19'-7 1/16"19'-7 1/16"25'-0"Existing Grade (Most Restrictive) 1 2 3 4 ±0" 1 First Floor ±0" 1 First Floor +9'-3" 2 Second Floor +9'-3" 2 Second Floor +18'-3" 3 Roof +18'-3" 3 Roof SCALE: 1/4" = 1'-0" 1 Existing South Elevation A204 SCALE: 1/4" = 1'-0" 2 Existing West Elevation A204 SCALE: 1:0.17 3 Existing South Photo A204 SCALE: 1:0.17 4 Existing West Photo A204 27 March 2023 SHEET TITLE INTEGRATED DESIGN TEAM PROJECT NO: MODEL FILE: DRAWN BY: COPYRIGHT: SHEET 54 A211 Jeffrey H Woodruff 312_W_Hyman_03312023.pln Project No. 116 /Users/jeffrey/Documents/Cloud Hill/Rainbow/structural/312_W_Hyman_03312023.plnPowder Day Skiiing, LLC, David A Tarrab Mees Garage Elevations 312 W Hyman Ave 312 W Hyman Ave Lots P+Q, Block 46 Aspen CO 81611 USA/ Pitkin County UGB, City of Aspen 312 W Hyman Ave Aspen CO 81611 USA Account # R000145 Parcel ID # 273512464006 Landscape Architect Jennifer M. Dolecki-Smith, RLA Escape Garden Design, LLC Civil Grading and Drainage Jay Engstrom, P.E. Crystal River Civil, LLC Structural Engineer Brian Rossiter, P.E. bwr.pe Contractor COA- HPO Site Visit08/22/21 Jeffrey H. Woodruff AIA, LEED AP Cloud Hill Design, LLC Snowmass CO 81654 USA COA- HPC Conceptual02/26/22 COA- HPC Conceptual04/27/22 COA- HPC Final07/27/22 COA- City Council Call Up10/12/22 COA- HPC Final04/12/23 +9'-3" 2 Second Floor +18'-3" 3 Roof PV Array D GAR2 D GAR1Stucco ±0" 1 First Floor +9'-3" 2 Second Floor +18'-3" 3 Roof 6'-0"New Fence as per landscapeNew Stucco PV Array W G3 D G1 W G1 trees #3-5 ±0" 1 First Floor ±0" 1 First Floor +9'-3" 2 Second Floor +9'-3" 2 Second Floor +18'-3" 3 Roof +18'-3" 3 Roof 13'-6 15/32" Berridge Zinc Grey Tee-Lock Roof Stucco W G2 ±0" 1 First Floor +9'-3" 2 Second Floor +18'-3" 3 Roof New Stucco SCALE: 1/4" = 1'-0" 1 Garage Elevation North A211 SCALE: 1/4" = 1'-0" 2 Garage South Elevation A211 SCALE: 1/4" = 1'-0" 3 East Elevation A211 SCALE: 1/4" = 1'-0" 4 West Elevation A211 27 March 2023 SHEET TITLE INTEGRATED DESIGN TEAM PROJECT NO: MODEL FILE: DRAWN BY: COPYRIGHT: SHEET 55 A300 Jeffrey H Woodruff 312_W_Hyman_03312023.pln Project No. 116 /Users/jeffrey/Documents/Cloud Hill/Rainbow/structural/312_W_Hyman_03312023.plnPowder Day Skiiing, LLC, David A Tarrab Mees Transverse Sections 312 W Hyman Ave 312 W Hyman Ave Lots P+Q, Block 46 Aspen CO 81611 USA/ Pitkin County UGB, City of Aspen 312 W Hyman Ave Aspen CO 81611 USA Account # R000145 Parcel ID # 273512464006 Landscape Architect Jennifer M. Dolecki-Smith, RLA Escape Garden Design, LLC Civil Grading and Drainage Jay Engstrom, P.E. Crystal River Civil, LLC Structural Engineer Brian Rossiter, P.E. bwr.pe Contractor COA- HPO Site Visit08/22/21 Jeffrey H. Woodruff AIA, LEED AP Cloud Hill Design, LLC Snowmass CO 81654 USA COA- HPC Conceptual02/26/22 COA- HPC Conceptual04/27/22 COA- HPC Final07/27/22 COA- City Council Call Up10/12/22 COA- HPC Final04/12/23 E D C B A ±0" 1 First Floor3'-9"1'-0"New flu and cap as per mfg. (75' max), as per EPA Chimney cap and flashing, seal penetration MR Gypsum liner Steel structural (box), 10 guage Fiber cement exterior (match existing typ.) E D C B A ±0" 1 First Floor SCALE: 1/4" = 1'-0" 1 transverse at chimney (new) A300SCALE: 1/4" = 1'-0" 2 transverse at Bedroom #2 A300 27 March 2023 SHEET TITLE INTEGRATED DESIGN TEAM PROJECT NO: MODEL FILE: DRAWN BY: COPYRIGHT: SHEET 56 A301 Jeffrey H Woodruff 312_W_Hyman_03312023.pln Project No. 116 /Users/jeffrey/Documents/Cloud Hill/Rainbow/structural/312_W_Hyman_03312023.plnPowder Day Skiiing, LLC, David A Tarrab Mees Longitudinal Sections 312 W Hyman Ave 312 W Hyman Ave Lots P+Q, Block 46 Aspen CO 81611 USA/ Pitkin County UGB, City of Aspen 312 W Hyman Ave Aspen CO 81611 USA Account # R000145 Parcel ID # 273512464006 Landscape Architect Jennifer M. Dolecki-Smith, RLA Escape Garden Design, LLC Civil Grading and Drainage Jay Engstrom, P.E. Crystal River Civil, LLC Structural Engineer Brian Rossiter, P.E. bwr.pe Contractor COA- HPO Site Visit08/22/21 Jeffrey H. Woodruff AIA, LEED AP Cloud Hill Design, LLC Snowmass CO 81654 USA COA- HPC Conceptual02/26/22 COA- HPC Conceptual04/27/22 COA- HPC Final07/27/22 COA- City Council Call Up10/12/22 COA- HPC Final04/12/23 ±0" 1 First Floor +9'-3" 2 Second Floor +18'-3" 3 Roof 4 3 2 1 ±0" 1 First Floor +9'-3" 2 Second Floor +18'-3" 3 Roof 4'-4"garden storage bedroom # 2 casework SCALE: 1/4" = 1'-0" 1 Longitudinal at Stairs A301 SCALE: 1/4" = 1'-0" 2 longitudinal at Bedroom #2 and Garden Storage A301 27 March 2023 SHEET TITLE INTEGRATED DESIGN TEAM PROJECT NO: MODEL FILE: DRAWN BY: COPYRIGHT: SHEET 57 A500 Jeffrey H Woodruff 312_W_Hyman_03312023.pln Project No. 116 /Users/jeffrey/Documents/Cloud Hill/Rainbow/structural/312_W_Hyman_03312023.plnPowder Day Skiiing, LLC, David A Tarrab Mees Schedules 312 W Hyman Ave 312 W Hyman Ave Lots P+Q, Block 46 Aspen CO 81611 USA/ Pitkin County UGB, City of Aspen 312 W Hyman Ave Aspen CO 81611 USA Account # R000145 Parcel ID # 273512464006 Landscape Architect Jennifer M. Dolecki-Smith, RLA Escape Garden Design, LLC Civil Grading and Drainage Jay Engstrom, P.E. Crystal River Civil, LLC Structural Engineer Brian Rossiter, P.E. bwr.pe Contractor COA- HPO Site Visit08/22/21 Jeffrey H. Woodruff AIA, LEED AP Cloud Hill Design, LLC Snowmass CO 81654 USA COA- HPC Conceptual02/26/22 COA- HPC Conceptual04/27/22 COA- HPC Final07/27/22 COA- City Council Call Up10/12/22 COA- HPC Final04/12/23 WINDOW TYPE Casement Casement Casement Casement Fixed Fixed Fixed Fixed Fixed Fixed Fixed Fixed Fixed VIEW DIMENSIONS 1'-2"×4'-0"2'-6"×4'-0"7'-0"×4'-8"7'-0"×5'-0"1'-0"×1'-0"2'-0"×2'-6"2'-0"×4'-0"2'-1"×2'-8"3'-0"×4'-6"3'-10"×2'-8"3'-9"×3'-0"3'-9"×3'-2"6'-0"×3'-6" NOTES New Loewen, Al Clad New Loewen, Al Clad Existing: installing dou…Existing: installing dou…Flu at Living Room Attic Vents Existing Existing Existing Existing WINDOW LEGEND WINDOW SCHEDULE WINDOW NUMBER ROOM ID Nook W 2E W 3E W 4E W 4S W 5E W 5W W 6E W 6E W 6W W 7N W 8N W 9N W 11E W 12S W 14S W 15W W 16W W G1 W G2 W G3 W S7 ROOM NAME WIDOW SIZE NOMINAL WIDTH 2'-1" 3'-10" 2'-6" 2'-6" 3'-10" 3'-10" 3'-10" 2'-6" 2'-0" 3'-10" 1'-2" 3'-0" 3'-0" 7'-0" 7'-0" 7'-0" 6'-0" 6'-0" 4'-3" 4'-3" 2'-0" 2'-0" NOMINAL HEIGHT 2'-8" 2'-8" 4'-0" 4'-0" 2'-8" 3'-8" 2'-8" 4'-0" 4'-0" 2'-8" 4'-0" 4'-0" 4'-0" 4'-8" 5'-0" 5'-0" 3'-6" 3'-6" 4'-0" 4'-0" 4'-0" 3'-0" TYPE Undefined Sliding Casement Casement Sliding Sliding Sliding Casement Fixed Sliding Casement Sliding Sliding Casement Fixed Casement Sliding Sliding Sliding Sliding Sliding Undefined HEAD DETAIL A600 A600 A600 A600 A600 A600 A600 A600 A600 A600 A600 A600 A600 A600 A600 A600 A600 A600 A600 A600 A600 JAMB DETAIL A600 A600 A600 A600 A600 A600 A600 A600 A600 A600 A600 A600 A600 A600 A600 A600 A600 A600 A600 A600 A600 SILL DETAIL A600 A600 A600 A600 A600 A600 A600 A600 A600 A600 A600 A600 A600 A600 A600 A600 A600 A600 A600 A600 A600 ACCESORIES Loå2 -272 E272/I89 E272/I89 Loå2 -272 Loå2 -272 Loå2 -272 E272/I89 Loå2 -272 E272/I89 E272/I89 E272/I89 Loå2 -272 Loå2 -272 Loå2 -272 Loå2 -272 Loå2 -272 E272/I89 E272/I89 E272/I89 E272/I89 U-VALUE N/A .25 .27 .27 .25 .25 .25 .27 .27 .25 .27 .27 .25 .25 .25 .25 .25 .25 .25 .25 .25 .25 TEMPERED <Undefined> REMARKS Existing: wall nook, not a window Existing: installing double pane glass of the thinnest dimension, with a dark spacer New Loewen, Al Clad New Loewen, Al Clad Existing: installing double pane glass of the thinnest dimension, with a dark spacer New Loewen, Al Clad Existing: installing double pane glass of the thinnest dimension, with a dark spacer New Loewen, Al Clad Existing: installing double pane glass of the thinnest dimension, with a dark spacer New Loewen, Al Clad New Loewen, Al Clad New Loewen, Al Clad Existing: installing double pane glass of the thinnest dimension, with a dark spacer Existing: installing double pane glass of the thinnest dimension, with a dark spacer Existing: installing double pane glass of the thinnest dimension, with a dark spacer Existing: installing double pane glass of the thinnest dimension, with a dark spacer Existing: installing double pane glass of the thinnest dimension, with a dark spacer New Loewen, Al Clad New Loewen, Al Clad New Loewen, Al Clad New Loewen, Hopper (Carbon/Wood Clad) Fixed Fixed Fixed Sliding Sliding Sliding Sliding Sliding Sliding Undefined Undefined 7'-0"×4'-8"7'-0"×5'-0"7'-0"×5'-0"2'-0"×4'-0"3'-0"×4'-0"3'-10"×2'-8"3'-10"×3'-8"4'-3"×4'-0"6'-0"×3'-6"2'-0"×3'-0"2'-1"×2'-8" Existing Existing Existing: installing dou…New Loewen, Al Clad New Loewen, Al Clad Existing: installing dou…New Loewen, Al Clad New Loewen, Al Clad Existing: installing dou…New Loewen, Hopper …Existing: wall nook, not… WINDOW LEGEND CARDINAL PERFORMANCE 16 CENTER OF GLASS U-FACTOR FOR DOUBLE-PANE IG UNITS WITH Loå-i89® COATING Nominal Airspace 1/4 in (6.5 mm) 5/16 in (8.0 mm) 3/8 in (9.8 mm) 7/16 in (11.5 mm) 1/2 in (13.0 mm) 9/16 in (14.5 mm) 5/8 in (16.0 mm) 11/16 in (17.5 mm) 3/4 in (19.5 mm) Gas Fill air argon air argon air argon air argon air argon air argon air argon air argon air argon Loå-180® (#2) / Loå-i89® (#4) BTU/hr·ft²·°F (W/m²·K) 0.31 0.26 0.28 0.24 0.26 0.22 0.24 0.21 0.24 0.21 0.24 0.21 0.25 0.21 0.25 0.22 0.25 0.22 (1.76) (1.48) (1.59) (1.36) (1.48) (1.25) (1.36) (1.19) (1.36) (1.19) (1.36) (1.19) (1.42) (1.19) (1.42) (1.25) (1.42) (1.25) Loå²-272® (#2) / Loå-i89® (#4) BTU/hr·ft²·°F (W/m²·K) 0.30 0.26 0.28 0.23 0.25 0.21 0.24 0.20 0.23 0.20 0.24 0.20 0.24 0.21 0.24 0.21 0.24 0.21 (1.70) (1.48) (1.59) (1.31) (1.42) (1.19) (1.36) (1.14) (1.31) (1.14) (1.36) (1.14) (1.36) (1.19) (1.36) (1.19) (1.36) (1.19) Loå²-270® (#2) / Loå-i89® (#4) BTU/hr·ft²·°F (W/m²·K) 0.30 0.26 0.28 0.23 0.25 0.21 0.24 0.20 0.23 0.20 0.24 0.20 0.24 0.21 0.24 0.21 0.24 0.21 (1.70) (1.48) (1.59) (1.31) (1.42) (1.19) (1.36) (1.14) (1.31) (1.14) (1.36) (1.14) (1.36) (1.19) (1.36) (1.19) (1.36) (1.19) Loå³-366® (#2) / Loå-i89® (#4) BTU/hr·ft²·°F (W/m²·K) 0.30 0.25 0.27 0.23 0.25 0.20 0.23 0.19 0.23 0.20 0.23 0.20 0.23 0.20 0.24 0.20 0.24 0.21 (1.70) (1.42) (1.53) (1.31) (1.42) (1.14) (1.31) (1.08) (1.31) (1.14) (1.31) (1.14) (1.31) (1.14) (1.36) (1.14) (1.36) (1.19) Quad Loå-452+™ (#2) / Loå-i89® (#4) BTU/hr·ft²·°F (W/m²·K) 0.30 0.25 0.27 0.22 0.25 0.20 0.23 0.19 0.23 0.20 0.23 0.20 0.23 0.20 0.24 0.20 0.24 0.21 (1.70) (1.42) (1.53) (1.25) (1.42) (1.14) (1.31) (1.08) (1.31) (1.14) (1.31) (1.14) (1.31) (1.14) (1.36) (1.14) (1.36) (1.19) Loå³-340® (#2) / Loå-i89® (#4) BTU/hr·ft²·°F (W/m²·K) 0.30 0.25 0.27 0.23 0.25 0.21 0.23 0.20 0.23 0.20 0.23 0.20 0.24 0.20 0.24 0.21 0.24 0.21 (1.70) (1.42) (1.53) (1.31) (1.42) (1.19) (1.31) (1.14) (1.31) (1.14) (1.31) (1.14) (1.36) (1.14) (1.36) (1.19) (1.36) 1.19 Loå²-240® (#2) / Loå-i89® (#4) BTU/hr·ft²·°F (W/m²·K) 0.31 0.26 0.28 0.23 0.26 0.21 0.24 0.21 0.24 0.21 0.24 0.21 0.24 0.21 0.25 0.21 0.25 0.22 (1.76) (1.48) (1.59) (1.31) (1.48) (1.19) (1.36) (1.19) (1.36) (1.19) (1.36) (1.19) (1.36) (1.19) (1.42) (1.19) (1.42) (1.25) Nominal Airspace 1/4 in (6.5 mm) 5/16 in (8.0 mm) 3/8 in (9.8 mm) 7/16 in (11.5 mm) 1/2 in (13.0 mm) 9/16 in (14.5 mm) 5/8 in (16.0 mm) 11/16 in (17.5 mm) 3/4 in (19.5 mm) Gas Fill air argon air argon air argon air argon air argon air argon air argon air argon air argon Clear / Clear BTU/hr·ft²·°F (W/m²·K) 0.54 N/A 0.52 N/A 0.50 N/A 0.48 N/A 0.48 N/A 0.48 N/A 0.48 N/A 0.48 N/A 0.49 N/A (3.07) (N/A) (2.95) (N/A) (2.84) (N/A) (2.73) (N/A) (2.73) (N/A) (2.73) (N/A) (2.73) (N/A) (2.73) (N/A) (2.78) (N/A) Clear / Loå-180® BTU/hr·ft²·°F (W/m²·K) 0.40 0.33 0.36 0.29 0.33 0.27 0.31 0.26 0.31 0.26 0.31 0.27 0.32 0.27 0.32 0.27 0.32 0.28 (2.27) (1.87) (2.04) (1.65) (1.87) (1.53) (1.76) (1.48) (1.76) (1.48) (1.76) (1.53) (1.82) (1.53) (1.82) (1.53) (1.82) (1.59) Clear / Loå-180 ESC™ BTU/hr·ft²·°F (W/m²·K) 0.40 0.33 0.36 0.30 0.33 0.27 0.31 0.26 0.31 0.27 0.31 0.27 0.32 0.27 0.32 0.28 0.33 0.28 (2.27) (1.87) (2.04) (1.70) (1.87) (1.53) (1.76) (1.48) (1.76) (1.53) (1.76) (1.53) (1.82) (1.53) (1.82) (1.59) (1.87) (1.59) Loå²-272® / Clear BTU/hr·ft²·°F (W/m²·K) 0.39 0.32 0.35 0.28 0.32 0.26 0.30 0.25 0.30 0.25 0.30 0.26 0.31 0.26 0.31 0.26 0.31 0.27 (2.21) (1.82) (1.99) (1.59) (1.82) (1.48) (1.70) (1.42) (1.70) (1.42) (1.70) (1.48) (1.76) (1.48) (1.76) (1.48) (1.76) (1.53) Loå²-270® / Clear BTU/hr·ft²·°F (W/m²·K) 0.39 0.32 0.35 0.29 0.31 0.25 0.30 0.25 0.30 0.25 0.30 0.25 0.30 0.26 0.31 0.26 0.31 0.26 (2.21) (1.82) (1.99) (1.65) (1.76) (1.42) (1.70) (1.42) (1.70) (1.42) (1.70) (1.42) (1.70) (1.48) (1.76) (1.48) (1.76) (1.48) Loå3-366® / Clear BTU/hr·ft²·°F (W/m²·K) 0.39 0.31 0.34 0.28 0.31 0.25 0.29 0.24 0.29 0.24 0.30 0.25 0.30 0.25 0.30 0.25 0.31 0.26 (2.21) (1.76) (1.93) (1.59) (1.76) (1.42) (1.65) (1.36) (1.65) (1.36) (1.70) (1.42) (1.70) (1.42) (1.70) (1.42) (1.76) (1.48) Quad Loå-452+™ / Clear BTU/hr·ft²·°F (W/m²·K) 0.39 0.31 0.34 0.27 0.31 0.25 0.29 0.24 0.29 0.24 0.29 0.25 0.30 0.25 0.30 0.25 0.31 0.26 (2.21) (1.76) (1.93) (1.53) (1.76) (1.42) (1.65) (1.36) (1.65) (1.36) (1.65) (1.42) (1.70) (1.42) (1.70) (1.42) (1.76) (1.48) Loå3-340® / Clear BTU/hr·ft²·°F (W/m²·K) 0.39 0.32 0.35 0.28 0.31 0.25 0.29 0.24 0.29 0.25 0.30 0.25 0.30 0.25 0.31 0.26 0.31 0.26 (2.21) (1.82) (1.99) (1.59) (1.76) (1.42) (1.65) (1.36) (1.65) (1.42) (1.70) (1.42) (1.70) (1.42) (1.76) (1.48) (1.76) (1.48) Loå2-240® / Clear BTU/hr·ft²·°F (W/m²·K) 0.40 0.33 0.36 0.29 0.32 0.26 0.30 0.25 0.30 0.26 0.31 0.26 0.31 0.27 0.32 0.27 0.32 0.27 (2.27) (1.87) (2.04) (1.65) (1.82) (1.48) (1.70) (1.42) (1.70) (1.48) (1.76) (1.48) (1.76) (1.53) (1.82) (1.53) (1.82) (1.53) Center of Glass U- Factors of IG Units The following tables show how Cardinal Loå coatings and argon filling improve center of glass U-Factors. U-Factor vs. Airspace Thickness In addition to showing the benefit of Loå coatings and argon filling, this table shows that the optimum airspace thickness can range between 7/16” (11.5 mm) and 5/8” (16.0 mm). This illustrates that increasing airspaces greater than 16.0 mm increases U-Factor, thereby decreasing thermal performance. 1. Calculated values using LBNL Window computer program per NFRC environmental conditions. 2. For double-pane IG units, the Loå coatings are on surfaces #2 or #3. 3. U-Factor calculated atcenter of glass. 4. Glass thickness is 3.0 mm. 5. Argon fill is 90%. 1. Calculated values using LBNL Window computer program per NFRC environmental conditions. 2. For double-pane IG units the Loå coatings are on surfaces #2 or #3. 3. U-Factor calculated atcenter of glass. 4. Glass thickness is 3.0 mm. 5. Argon fill is 90%. Figure 2-4 Figure 2-5 SCALE: 1' = 1'-0" 1 Window Legend A500 SCALE: 1' = 1'-0" 2 Window Schedule A500 SCALE: 1' = 1'-0" 3 Window Legend A500 4 Black Spacer Option A500 6 08 TGG_V3.0_Final_11-20-2020 A500 Replacement glass Cardinal LoĒ-272 - (2) Calculations based on 3 mm (1/8") glass, 9.8 mm (3/8") airspace, 3 mm (1/8") glass • Unlabeled elements are on a locked or hidden model layer, id est the model contains the "new" and "existing", but the schedule is only drawing from the "new" 27 March 2023 SHEET TITLE INTEGRATED DESIGN TEAM PROJECT NO: MODEL FILE: DRAWN BY: COPYRIGHT: SHEET 58 A501 Jeffrey H Woodruff 312_W_Hyman_03312023.pln Project No. 116 /Users/jeffrey/Documents/Cloud Hill/Rainbow/structural/312_W_Hyman_03312023.plnPowder Day Skiiing, LLC, David A Tarrab Mees Schedules 312 W Hyman Ave 312 W Hyman Ave Lots P+Q, Block 46 Aspen CO 81611 USA/ Pitkin County UGB, City of Aspen 312 W Hyman Ave Aspen CO 81611 USA Account # R000145 Parcel ID # 273512464006 Landscape Architect Jennifer M. Dolecki-Smith, RLA Escape Garden Design, LLC Civil Grading and Drainage Jay Engstrom, P.E. Crystal River Civil, LLC Structural Engineer Brian Rossiter, P.E. bwr.pe Contractor COA- HPO Site Visit08/22/21 Jeffrey H. Woodruff AIA, LEED AP Cloud Hill Design, LLC Snowmass CO 81654 USA COA- HPC Conceptual02/26/22 COA- HPC Conceptual04/27/22 COA- HPC Final07/27/22 COA- City Council Call Up10/12/22 COA- HPC Final04/12/23 TYPE ---Flush Flush Flush Flush Flush Flush Flush Flush Flush Flush Flush Flush Flush VIEW DIMENSIONS 3'-0"×8'-0"2'-0"×8'-0"2'-0"×8'-0"2'-10"×8'-0"2'-4"×8'-0"2'-6"×8'-0"2'-6"×8'-0"2'-6"×8'-0"2'-8"×8'-0"2'-8"×8'-0"3'-0"×6'-8"3'-0"×7'-0"3'-0"×8'-0"3'-0"×8'-0" NOTES Interior, Pantry Primary Bedroom Interior, bedroom door Primary Bedroom Hall closet to mechanical Interior, Mechanical Existing (interior)Existing (interior)Existing, no change (… DOOR LEGEND DOOR SCHEDULE DOOR NUMBER ROOM ID D1 L1 D 1E D 1E D 1N D 2N D 2N D 2N D 2S D 3E D 3S D 4S D 5S D 6W D 22E D B1 D B2 D B3 D B4 D B5 D B6 D B7 D G1 D GAR1 D GAR2 D M1 D M1 D M 2 D P1 D PB1 D PB2 D PB3 D PB4 D PB5 ROOM NAME DOOR LEAF NOMINAL WIDTH 3'-0" 6'-0" 3'-0" 6'-0" 2'-4" 6'-0" 2'-4" 7'-9" 3'-0" 7'-9" 7'-9" 7'-9" 3'-6" 3'-0" 2'-6" 2'-6" 2'-6" 2'-6" 2'-6" 2'-0" 4'-0" 3'-0" 13'-6" 5'-0" 2'-8" 3'-0" 2'-8" 2'-0" 2'-10" 3'-0" 2'-6" 2'-6" 2'-0" NOMINAL HEIGHT 6'-8" 7'-0" 8'-0" 7'-6" 8'-0" 7'-6" 8'-0" 6'-5" 2'-9" 6'-5" 6'-5" 6'-5" 7'-6" 6'-6" 8'-0" 8'-0" 8'-0" 8'-0" 8'-0" 8'-0" 8'-0" 8'-0" 8'-0" 6'-9" 8'-0" 8'-0" 8'-0" 8'-0" 8'-0" 8'-0" 8'-0" 8'-0" 8'-0" LEAF THICKNESS 1 3/4" 1 3/4" 1 3/4" 1 3/4" 1 3/4" 1 3/4" 1 3/4" 1 3/4" 1 3/4" 1 3/4" 1 3/4" 1 3/4" 1 3/4" 1 3/4" 1 3/4" 1 3/4" 1 3/4" 1 3/4" 1 3/4" 1 3/4" 1 3/4" 1 3/4" 1 3/4" 1 3/4" 1 3/4" 1 3/4" 1 3/4" 1 3/4" 1 3/4" 1 3/4" 1 3/4" 1 3/4" 1 3/4" MATERIAL Undefined SC WOOD SC WOOD SC WOOD Undefined SC WOOD Undefined SC WOOD SC WOOD SC WOOD SC WOOD SC WOOD SC WOOD SC WOOD Undefined Undefined Undefined SC WOOD Undefined Undefined Undefined SC WOOD SC WOOD SC WOOD SC WOOD Undefined SC WOOD SC WOOD SC WOOD SC WOOD SC WOOD Undefined Undefined TYPE HEAD DETAIL A600 A600 A600 A600 A600 A600 A600 A600 A600 A600 A600 A600 A600 A600 A600 A600 A600 A600 A600 A600 A600 JAMB DETAIL A600 A600 A600 A600 A600 A600 A600 A600 A600 A600 A600 A600 A600 A600 A600 A600 A600 A600 A600 A600 A600 SILL DETAIL A600 A600 A600 A600 A600 A600 A600 A600 A600 A600 A600 A600 A600 A600 A600 A600 A600 A600 A600 A600 A600 HARD WARE SET ACCESORIES RATINGS FIRE <Undefined> <Undefined> <Undefined> <Undefined> <Undefined> <Undefined> <Undefined> <Undefined> <Undefined> <Undefined> <Undefined> <Undefined> <Undefined> <Undefined> <Undefined> <Undefined> <Undefined> <Undefined> <Undefined> <Undefined> <Undefined> <Undefined> <Undefined> <Undefined> <Undefined> <Undefined> <Undefined> <Undefined> <Undefined> <Undefined> <Undefined> <Undefined> <Undefined> STC REMARKS Loewen, 2nd Floor Balcony (Al. Clad) Existing, no change (@ stairs) New Loewen, Al Clad New Loewen, Al Clad Existing Garage Door, Cut to Make Bi-fold shutters Louvered stair door Existing Garage Door, Cut to Make Bi-fold shutters New Loewen Sliders at garage doors New Loewen Sliders at garage doors New Loewen Entry with Sidelights, match existing historic RO Existing door, replace the screen door if needed, no change to historic door Interior, bedroom door Garage, entry door Garage door, new Trash enclosure door Hall closet to mechanical Interior, Mechanical Interior, Pantry Primary Bedroom Primary Bedroom Primary Bedroom Flush Flush Flush Standard 4 Panel Standard 4 Panel Standard 6 Panel No Grid H-V Grid H-V Grid H-V Grid H-V Grid Glass Panel 1 Glass Panel 1 Louvered 1 3'-0"×8'-0"4'-0"×8'-0"7'-9"×6'-5"2'-9"×7'-0"3'-0"×7'-0"2'-9"×7'-0"7'-9"×6'-5"3'-0"×8'-0"3'-6"×7'-6"6'-0"×7'-0"6'-0"×7'-6"3'-0"×6'-6"3'-0"×6'-6"3'-0"×2'-9" Primary Bedroom Existing Garage Door, …Existing (interior)Existing (interior)Existing (interior)New Loewen Sliders a…Garage, entry door New Loewen Entry wit…Loewen, 2nd Floor Bal…New Loewen, Al Clad Existing (interior)Existing door, replace t…Louvered stair door DOOR LEGEND Standard 1 Panel Style 1 Style 1 Style 5 5'-10"×7'-6"5'-0"×6'-9"8'-3"×6'-5"13'-6"×8'-0" Existing (interior)Trash enclosure door Existing Garage Door (s)Garage door, new DOOR LEGEND SCALE: 1:0.95 2 Door Schedule A501 SCALE: 1' = 1'-0" 6 Door Legend A501 • Unlabeled elements are on a locked or hidden model layer, id est the model contains the "new" and "existing", but the schedule is only drawing from the "new" 27 March 2023 SHEET TITLE INTEGRATED DESIGN TEAM PROJECT NO: MODEL FILE: DRAWN BY: COPYRIGHT: SHEET 59 A600 Jeffrey H Woodruff 312_W_Hyman_03312023.pln Project No. 116 /Users/jeffrey/Documents/Cloud Hill/Rainbow/structural/312_W_Hyman_03312023.plnPowder Day Skiiing, LLC, David A Tarrab Mees Assemblies & Plan Details 312 W Hyman Ave 312 W Hyman Ave Lots P+Q, Block 46 Aspen CO 81611 USA/ Pitkin County UGB, City of Aspen 312 W Hyman Ave Aspen CO 81611 USA Account # R000145 Parcel ID # 273512464006 Landscape Architect Jennifer M. Dolecki-Smith, RLA Escape Garden Design, LLC Civil Grading and Drainage Jay Engstrom, P.E. Crystal River Civil, LLC Structural Engineer Brian Rossiter, P.E. bwr.pe Contractor COA- HPO Site Visit08/22/21 Jeffrey H. Woodruff AIA, LEED AP Cloud Hill Design, LLC Snowmass CO 81654 USA COA- HPC Conceptual02/26/22 COA- HPC Conceptual04/27/22 COA- HPC Final07/27/22 COA- City Council Call Up10/12/22 COA- HPC Final04/12/23 5/8" GWB 2X6 FRAMING R-21 BATT STRUCTURAL PLY AIR AND VAPOR BARRIER 1 1/2" RIGID INSUL. W/ 1 X FURRING R-5 AIR SPACE WOOD SIDING TOTAL R-VALUE = 26 W1 5/8" GWB 2X6 FRAMING R-21 BATT STRUCTURAL PLY AIR AND VAPOR BARRIER 1 1/2" RIGID INSUL. W/ 1 X FURRING R-5 AIR SPACE STUCCO TOTAL R-VALUE = 26 W2 HISTORIC ROOF ● torch applied 3 layer asphalt ● 1/2" DENSDECK, THERMAL, MOISTURE, WIND BARRIER (Not on file) ● 1 1/2" POLYISO RIGID INSUL R7.5 (Not on file) ● 3/4" SHEATHING ● WOOD RAFTERS RE: STRUCT ● SPRAY FOAM (7" @ 6.5R/in) R45.5 ● HAT CHANNELS ● WOOD T&G TOTAL R VALUE = R53 COA DEWPOINT CALCULATOR: R Value of Assembly = 55.32 Temp. of Condensing Surface = 68.9 (must be greater than 41 degrees) R1 SLAB ON GRADE ● 2" RIGID INSULATION ● 15 MIL VAPOR RETARDER ● 4" GRAVEL ● UNDISTURBED OR COMPACTED SUBGRADE F1 ● STANDING SEAM METAL ROOF ● 1/2" DENSDECK ● 1 1/2" POLYISO RIGID INSUL R7.5 ● 3/4" SHEATHING ● WOOD RAFTERS RE: STRUCT ● SPRAY FOAM (7" @ 6.5R/in) R45.5 ● HAT CHANNELS ● GWB TOTAL R VALUE = R53 COA DEWPOINT CALCULATOR: R Value of Assembly = 55.32 Temp. of Condensing Surface = 68.9 (must be greater than 41 degrees) R2 ● CARPET AND PAD ● 3/4" PLYWOOD(UNDERLAYMENT GRADE) ● 1X2 SLEEPERS ● 2" RIGID INSULATION ● 15 MIL VAPOR RETARDER ● 4" GRAVEL ● UNDISTURBED OR COMPACTED SUBGRADE F2 5/8" GWB (furr out for electrical), 2 x 5/8" if variance granted for distance to prop line. CMU Block (as per struct) STRUCTURAL PLY AIR AND VAPOR BARRIER 1 1/2" RIGID INSUL. W/ 1 X FURRING R-5 AIR SPACE STUCCO TOTAL R-VALUE = 26 W4 (NEW CMU, Garage, 1 Hour Firewall) 5/8" GWB (OR TWO LAYERS MRG) R-.5625 10 GAUGE STEEL (BOX) FIBER CEMENT BOARD STRUCTURAL PLY R-.62 AIR AND VAPOR BARRIER 1 1/2" RIGID INSUL. W/ 1 X FURRING R-5 AIR SPACE STUCCO TOTAL R-VALUE = 16.5 W 6 Chimney and Flu (Rebuilt) HISTORIC BUILDING DRAINAGE MAT (BELOW GRADE ONLY) WATERPROOFING (BELOW GRADE ONLY) CONCRETE MASONRY UNIT 3/4" AIR GAP 2 X 4 FRAMING 3.5" CLOSED CELL SPRAY FOAM INSULATION, R-21 5/8" GWG TOTAL R VALUE = 21 W3 (Existing CMU) 5/8" GWB 2X4 FRAMING ACCOUSTIC BAT INSUL. 5/8" GWB W5 2 1/16" 3" 1 3/8" 5/8" 1 3/8"1 11/16"2 7/8"3 5/8"3 7/16"3 3/4"2 15/16"1 1/8"6 9/16"R.O. (Rough Opening) System Width 1 5/16" 3 1/2" 4"1/2"Jamb Width 8 1/16"3 3/16"1 5/16" 3 1/2" 4"1/2"Jamb Width 8 1/16"3 3/16"R.O. (Rough Opening) System Width 1 5/16" 3 1/2" 4"1/2"Jamb Width 8 1/16"3 3/16"1 5/16" 3 1/2" 4"1/2"Jamb Width 8 1/16"3 3/16"Awning Push Out Patio Door Bi Parting Jamb (may need a jamb extension), or wrap cladding to jamb6 9/16"1 3/16"1 3/8" 2 1/16"3/4"1 11/16"1 3/4"4 5/16" 13/16" 1 1/2" 2 1/8" 2 13/16" 3/16" 2 15/16"7 13/16"6 1/16"1 1/4"1 15/16"6 9/16"1 3/16"4 9/16"1 5/16"2 15/16"6 1/16"1 1/4"1 15/16"6 9/16"1 3/16"4 9/16"1 5/16"2 15/16"METAL CLAD - TWO WIDE4 9/16" (116 mm) JAMB7"1 3/4"1 15/16"6 9/16"4 9/16"1 3/16"1 1/4"2 15/16"1 5/16"BiFold - 3 inch Narrow Stile (may need jamb extension) Narrow Stile Outswing French Terrace Door Narrow Stile Outswing Terrace Door May 20, 2022 4:24 PM Quote: 110504 Job Name: 312 W HYMAN Tag: 312 W HYMAN 16 - of - Loewen Proposes to Furnish The Products Within This Quote - Errors and Omissions Excepted Item: 34 Qty: 1 Patio/French Patio Door Label: GARAGE DOORS Exterior View Frame Size : 96" (2438mm) x 75" (1905mm)Rough Opening : 96 23/32" (2457mm) x 75 19/32" (1920mm) Casing Not Required Unit Shape/Build Options GARAGE DOORS Sliding Patio Rectangular (Or Square) Douglas Fir Dimension Details Jamb: 6 11/16" (170mm) Finish Options Frame: Primed Sash: Sash Color Matches Frame Color Int Frame: Natural Wood Int Sash/Panel: Matches Frame Unit Operation/Type O X Oper Panels Shipped With Frame 2 15/16" (75mm) Narrow Stile 2 7/8" (73mm) Bottom Rail Glazing Options Heat Smart Double 272 Interior Surface LOW-E - i89 All Panes Tempered 4 MM Glass Thickness Black Stainless Steel Spacer Black Bar(63) 1/2"(13mm) C/W Capillary Tubes Less Argon Interior Putty Glazing Stops Hardware Options 2-Point Automatic Multipoint Hdwr Miami Handle Hardware Color: PVD Bronze Key - Thumb Cylinder C/W 1 Security Foot Locks Bronze Footlock Door Sill Options Bronze Anodized Aluminum Sill Attachment Options Field Installed Dripflash Nailing Flange: Head, Left, Right 5/8" (16MM) Jamb Extension Face Screen Options Sliding Screen Alpine White (Std) Less Visible Screen (High Trans) Miscellaneous Options Cubes: 43 N Performance Data Not Impact Certified U-value: 0.25 Visible Transmittance: 0.53 Solar Heat Gain Coefficient: 0.31 Performance Grade: UNAVAILABLE Totals Submitted By : Accepted By : Date : Net Material:$63,001.53 Subtotal:$63,001.53 Misc Charge:$0.00 Aspen City Limits (9.3%):$5,859.14 Deposit:$0.00 Total:$68,860.67 This quote is valid for 30 days. All window and door specifications are the sole responsibility of the purchaser. Please review all specifications, including dimensions, glazing, functions, colors, finishes, handings and hardware selections with your Architectural Windows & Doors, Inc. sales representative prior to signing off on this order to insure 100% accuracy. Once the order is placed with the factory it cannot be cancelled or modified. All of these products are made to order and cannot be returned to Architectural Windows & Doors, Inc. for credit or other consideration. Any shortages must be reported within 7 business days from the date of delivery to the job site. The purchaser is responsible for inspecting the goods received and should refer to our itemized delivery ticket when verifying missing or incorrect items. Product representations and warranties are the sole responsibility of the manufacturer. Note: Structural support may be required around and between mulled units. The size and type to be determined by a structural engineer. Prices are subject to change without notice. SCALE: 1" = 1'-0" 1 Assemblies A600 2 Loewen Wood Clad Plan Details (Generic Assembly) A600 3 Loewen Wood Clad Plan Details (Generic Assembly) A600 4 1 Hour Fire Rated Wall at Detached Garage- 8" CMU Wall, BOND BM w/ #5 CONT @ 48" OC & TOW & BOW, Fully Grouted Cells below Grade A600 5 8" CMU Wall, UL Classification A600 6 Loewen 312 W Hyman 5.20.22 A600 27 March 2023 SHEET TITLE INTEGRATED DESIGN TEAM PROJECT NO: MODEL FILE: DRAWN BY: COPYRIGHT: SHEET 60 A601 Jeffrey H Woodruff 312_W_Hyman_03312023.pln Project No. 116 /Users/jeffrey/Documents/Cloud Hill/Rainbow/structural/312_W_Hyman_03312023.plnPowder Day Skiiing, LLC, David A Tarrab Mees Assemblies- Skylights, Fenestration 312 W Hyman Ave 312 W Hyman Ave Lots P+Q, Block 46 Aspen CO 81611 USA/ Pitkin County UGB, City of Aspen 312 W Hyman Ave Aspen CO 81611 USA Account # R000145 Parcel ID # 273512464006 Landscape Architect Jennifer M. Dolecki-Smith, RLA Escape Garden Design, LLC Civil Grading and Drainage Jay Engstrom, P.E. Crystal River Civil, LLC Structural Engineer Brian Rossiter, P.E. bwr.pe Contractor COA- HPO Site Visit08/22/21 Jeffrey H. Woodruff AIA, LEED AP Cloud Hill Design, LLC Snowmass CO 81654 USA COA- HPC Conceptual02/26/22 COA- HPC Conceptual04/27/22 COA- HPC Final07/27/22 COA- City Council Call Up10/12/22 COA- HPC Final04/12/23 0-9 o o 0:12 - 2:12 Sky-Global Product Management 1-800-88-VELUX www.VELUXUSA.com 1418 Evans Pond Road Greenwood, SC 29649 R VELUX VELUX is a registered trademark FCM - Fixed Curb Mounted Skylight STANDARD GLAZING OPTIONS: · Laminated LowE3 (04) · Tempered LowE3 (05) · Impact (06) · White Laminated (08) Skylight Width Frame Width (Outside Curb) (Inside Curb) Frame Aperture Width Maximum Skylight Clearance Width 8769523434 1257 1257 4622 4646 1181 1181 851 648 648 648 2234 2222 2246 3046 3030 851 775 572 572 572 775 37 1/29528763434 648 1257 572 1181 49 1/2 49 1/2 4622 4646 851 648 953 1257 851 1181 876 572 1181 775 33 1/2 25 1/2 25 1/2 25 1/22234 2222 2246 3046 3030 33 1/2 38 5/839 1/834 1/237 1/239 1/8 38 5/8 27 1/8 51 1/8 51 1/8 50 5/8 22 1/225 1/2 49 1/2 46 1/2 26 5/8 50 5/8 51 1/8 27 1/8 39 1/8 51 1/8 35 1/8 26 5/8 34 5/8 27 1/8 35 1/8 46 1/249 1/2 37 1/2 25 1/2 49 1/2 34 1/2 22 1/2 46 1/2 33 1/2 30 1/2 50 5/8 26 5/8 38 5/8 50 5/8 34 5/8 27 1/8 27 1/8 35 1/8 51 1/8 26 5/8 26 5/8 34 5/8 50 5/8 30 1/2 46 1/2 22 1/2 22 1/2 22 1/2 30 1/2 46 1/2 34 1/2 689 689 689 892 892 994 1299 1299 676 676 676 879 981 1286 879 1286 689 994 1299 1299 1299 892 994 689 676 676 981 981 1286 1286 1286 879 0.60 0.92 1.39 0.68 0.77 0.68 0.50 0.33 9.85 8.27 7.27 15.02 6.46 7.27 5.39 3.52 1430 1446 2230 2270 1430 1446 2230 2270 648 648 572 572 689 689 676 676 1257 1181 1299 1286 851 775 892 879 25 1/2 22 1/2 27 1/8 26 5/8 25 1/2 22 1/2 27 1/8 26 5/8 33 1/2 30 1/2 35 1/8 34 5/8 33 1/2 30 1/2 35 1/8 34 5/8 49 1/2 46 1/2 51 1/8 50 5/8 851 775 892 879 445 445 368 368 485 485 473 473 1867 1790 1908 1895 1.02 0.28 0.43 0.44 17 1/2 14 1/2 19 1/8 18 5/8 17 1/2 14 1/2 19 1/8 18 5/8 73 1/2 70 1/2 75 1/8 74 5/8 11.01 3.07 4.68 4.76 This drawing is an instrument of service and is provided for informational use only. C 2017 VELUX GROUP PRODUCT DIMENSIONS METRIC UNITS (MILLIMETERS)IMPERIAL UNITS (INCHES) Size FrameWidth FrameApertureWidth FrameHeight FrameApertureHeight Daylight Area(Sq. Meters)SkylightWidth SkylightHeight Size FrameWidth FrameApertureWidth FrameHeight FrameApertureHeight Daylight Area(Sq. Feet)SkylightWidth SkylightHeight MaximumSkylightClearanceWidth MaximumSkylightClearanceHeight MaximumSkylightClearanceWidth MaximumSkylightClearanceHeight HORIZONTAL CROSS SECTIONVERTICAL CROSS SECTION SEE DETAIL 1 Minimum31/2"1/4"1/4" 3446 34468769529949811257118112991286 37 1/2 39 1/8 38 5/834 1/2 51 1/849 1/2 46 1/2 50 5/81.03 11.14 Skylight Height Frame Height (Outside Curb) (Inside Curb) Frame Aperture Height Maximum Skylight Clearance Height 1/4"1/4" 15ga, 1.5mm (0.06") Roll-Formed Aluminum Sash with Neutral Grey Kynar 500 Finish Silicone Primary Seal Roofing By Others Underlayment By Others #8 x 13/4" Stainless Steel Wood Screw By Others Insulated Glass Pane Drywall By Others Optional Accessory Tray Thermal Break Gasket with Integral Condensation Gutter and Condensate Weep Holes at Corners DETAIL 1 Decking By Others 11/2" Width Curb 31/2" Height MinimumBy Others Low slope roof application FCM is also available for use in high roof slope applications up to 60° C C CC B B BB q q qqFolder v v vvSettings $ $ $$Zoom FCM with ECW_Tile Roof_... FCM with ECW_Tile Roof_... Page Page 1 1 of 1 of 13 1 Velux Blinds A601 SCALE: 1' = 1'-0" 2 Standard Velux Sizes A601 SCALE: 1' = 1'-0" 3 Velux Models A601 SCALE: 3" = 1'-0" 4 Skylight Assembly A601 SCALE: 1' = 1'-0" 5 light shaft DASI, VELUX Digital Asset Storage Infrastructure A601 27 March 2023 SHEET TITLE INTEGRATED DESIGN TEAM PROJECT NO: MODEL FILE: DRAWN BY: COPYRIGHT: SHEET 61 A901 Jeffrey H Woodruff 312_W_Hyman_03312023.pln Project No. 116 /Users/jeffrey/Documents/Cloud Hill/Rainbow/structural/312_W_Hyman_03312023.plnPowder Day Skiiing, LLC, David A Tarrab Mees Relationship to Neighborhood 312 W Hyman Ave 312 W Hyman Ave Lots P+Q, Block 46 Aspen CO 81611 USA/ Pitkin County UGB, City of Aspen 312 W Hyman Ave Aspen CO 81611 USA Account # R000145 Parcel ID # 273512464006 Landscape Architect Jennifer M. Dolecki-Smith, RLA Escape Garden Design, LLC Civil Grading and Drainage Jay Engstrom, P.E. Crystal River Civil, LLC Structural Engineer Brian Rossiter, P.E. bwr.pe Contractor COA- HPO Site Visit08/22/21 Jeffrey H. Woodruff AIA, LEED AP Cloud Hill Design, LLC Snowmass CO 81654 USA COA- HPC Conceptual02/26/22 COA- HPC Conceptual04/27/22 COA- HPC Final07/27/22 COA- City Council Call Up10/12/22 COA- HPC Final04/12/23 1 North Drone View A901 2 South Drone View A901 3 North Drone View A901 27 March 2023 SHEET TITLE INTEGRATED DESIGN TEAM PROJECT NO: MODEL FILE: DRAWN BY: COPYRIGHT: SHEET 62 A- E100 Jeffrey H Woodruff 312_W_Hyman_03312023.pln Project No. 116 /Users/jeffrey/Documents/Cloud Hill/Rainbow/structural/312_W_Hyman_03312023.plnPowder Day Skiiing, LLC, David A Tarrab Mees Electrical Narrative 312 W Hyman Ave 312 W Hyman Ave Lots P+Q, Block 46 Aspen CO 81611 USA/ Pitkin County UGB, City of Aspen 312 W Hyman Ave Aspen CO 81611 USA Account # R000145 Parcel ID # 273512464006 Landscape Architect Jennifer M. Dolecki-Smith, RLA Escape Garden Design, LLC Civil Grading and Drainage Jay Engstrom, P.E. Crystal River Civil, LLC Structural Engineer Brian Rossiter, P.E. bwr.pe Contractor COA- HPO Site Visit08/22/21 Jeffrey H. Woodruff AIA, LEED AP Cloud Hill Design, LLC Snowmass CO 81654 USA COA- HPC Conceptual02/26/22 COA- HPC Conceptual04/27/22 COA- HPC Final07/27/22 COA- City Council Call Up10/12/22 COA- HPC Final04/12/23 SCALE: 1' = 1'-0" 1 513 W. Hyman.5.19.22.312 A- E100 12 April 2023 To: City of Aspen From: Jeffrey Woodruff, Cloud Hill Design, LLC, rep Powderdayskiing, LLC RE: Electrical service needs at 312 West Hyman, as per HPC conceptual review and follow up Utilities City of Aspen 312 W Hyman Ave #Upst 01-25036520-00 City of Aspen 312 W Hyman Ave #DWST 01-250360-00 Currently we have 300 Amp total building services, far exceeding our current and anticipated needs 312 W Hyman Ave #Upst on a 200 Amp service (need to confirm again with provider) 312 W Hyman Ave #DWST on a 100 Amp Efficiency Renewables - Energy Neutral- Renewable Electrification Work with City of Aspen Electric (no incentives), CORE (rebates and grants), Federal ITC. No REMP (< 64 SQ FT hot tub, no snowmelt) Building Envelope Building Mechanical Systems- Building Loads Windows- all outmoded, end of useful life single pane with no UV protection. Solution to existing single pane, “installing double pane glass of the thinnest dimension, with a dark spacer” Current ACH > 1.2. Will provide blower door (pre and) post construction. Thermal loads- assuming two units, need of 40 A/unit Thermal loads- assuming one or two units, need of 40 A/unit (assuming potential for electric back up - for low temp, id est negative temperature and hyper heat performs with less efficiency)  Mitsubishi Hyper-Heat Electrical Requirements Model: MXZ-8C48NAHZ2 (48,000 BTU/H) MXZ-8C60NA2 (60,000 BTU/H) Power Supply Voltage,Phase, Hertz 208 / 230V, 1-Phase, 60 Hz Recommended Fuse/Breaker Size 40 A MCA 35 A Voltage Indoor - Outdoor S1-S2 A C 208 / 230 Indoor - Outdoor S2-S3 +12 VDC to +24 VDC Kitchen Needs Electric refrigeration Dishwasher Induction Electric cooking Electrical requirements WasherDryer(s) Hot water heater/heat pump/Energy Star (heat pump/hybrid) (AO Smith or Rheem) AO Smith (and Water Softener) LED lighting and controls all run on < 15 AMP (if all LED) Outdoor energy consumption Fossil fuel needs- outdoor gathering space outdoor electric space heaters (preferred) Hot tub <64 Sq Ft. (to avoid REMP fees), Crown XL Eave snowmelt (linear feet, health safety at entry) Walkway snowmelt (low albedo pavers) Car charger in detached garage Onsite renewable energy and storage Solar array (on garage roof) 5 Tesla Powerwalls (work with CORE) 27 March 2023 SHEET TITLE INTEGRATED DESIGN TEAM PROJECT NO: MODEL FILE: DRAWN BY: COPYRIGHT: SHEET 63 A- E101 Jeffrey H Woodruff 312_W_Hyman_03312023.pln Project No. 116 /Users/jeffrey/Documents/Cloud Hill/Rainbow/structural/312_W_Hyman_03312023.plnPowder Day Skiiing, LLC, David A Tarrab Mees Electrical- Exterior and Interior 312 W Hyman Ave 312 W Hyman Ave Lots P+Q, Block 46 Aspen CO 81611 USA/ Pitkin County UGB, City of Aspen 312 W Hyman Ave Aspen CO 81611 USA Account # R000145 Parcel ID # 273512464006 Landscape Architect Jennifer M. Dolecki-Smith, RLA Escape Garden Design, LLC Civil Grading and Drainage Jay Engstrom, P.E. Crystal River Civil, LLC Structural Engineer Brian Rossiter, P.E. bwr.pe Contractor COA- HPO Site Visit08/22/21 Jeffrey H. Woodruff AIA, LEED AP Cloud Hill Design, LLC Snowmass CO 81654 USA COA- HPC Conceptual02/26/22 COA- HPC Conceptual04/27/22 COA- HPC Final07/27/22 COA- City Council Call Up10/12/22 COA- HPC Final04/12/23 3¼” 3 65/8” 2 4¼” 3 7½” 2 4” 7¼” 8” / 10” / 12” / 14” / 16” / 18” / 20” ACCESSORIES Optional 1. Heavy Metal and RDX only 2. Heavy Metal and RDX glasses are 7½” in height 3. Heavy Metal and RDX glasses are 4” in diameter 1. Heavy Metal and RDX only 2. Heavy Metal and RDX cast guards are 8” in height 3. Heavy Metal and RDX cast guards are 5½” in diameter WIRE CAGE WITH GLASS ENCLOSURE • Wire cage can be specied in all standard and specialized nishes, and will match shade nish unless otherwise specied (Note: For galvanized shade nishes, wire cage is nished in Painted Natural Aluminum) • Glass is available in clear (-CGWC) or frosted (-FGWC) • See xture pages for availability -CGWC -FGWC (Clear Glass w/ Wire Cage) (Frosted Glass w/ Wire Cage) WIRE GUARD • Wire guard can be specied in all standard and specialized nishes, and will match shade nish unless otherwise specied (Note: For galvanized shade nishes, wire guard is nished in Painted Natural Aluminum) • See xture pages for availability -WG (Wire Guard) GLASS ENCLOSURE • Glass is available in clear (-CG), frosted (-FG) or opal (-OG) 1 • See xture pages for availability -CG -FG -OG (Clear Glass Enclosure) (Frosted Glass Enclosure) (Opal Glass Enclosure) 1 CAST GUARD WITH GLASS ENCLOSURE • Cast guard can be specied in all standard and specialized nishes, and will match shade nish unless otherwise specied (Note: For galvanized shade nishes, cast guard is unnished Raw Aluminum) • Glass is available in clear (-CGG), frosted (-FGG) or opal (-OGG) 1 • See xture pages for availability -CGG -FGG -OGG (Clear Glass w/ Cast Guard) (Frosted Glass w/ Cast Guard) (Opal Glass w/ Cast Guard) 1 Troy-CSL Lighting reserves the right to change the technical specications of its products at any time without notice. www.troyrlm.com 5958 6505 Gayhart Street, Commerce, CA 90040 TEL 323.767.2600 | www.noralighting.com | e-mail: nora@noralighting.com © 2021 Nora Lighting, Inc. All rights reserved. Specifications subject to change without notice. 101321P1 Type Project Catalog No. Notes NIO-4RG 4" Iolite Round Adjustable Gimbal Source: 14W to 28W LED 800lm to 2500lm Example: NIO-4RG50XWW = 4" Iolite Round Adjustable Gimbal, 5000K, White finish, 800lm / 14W PRODUCT DESCRIPTION 4" Iolite LED luminaire can be specified for use with Iolite new construction or remodel housings. Die-cast adjustable surface gimbals adjust to aim the light source in desired direction. FEATURES ·800lm, 1000lm, 1500lm, 2000lm or 2500lm LED packages ·2700K, 3000K, 3500K, 4000K, 5000K @ 90+ CRI ·Comfort Dim (warm dimming) also available in 800lm only ·Flood optic, narrow ood and spot optics (included) ·5-Year limited warranty SPECIFICATION Construction: Trims are constructed of heat dissipating, die-cast aluminum. The aluminum die-cast LED heat sink is threaded to fit the reflector and transfer heat. Mounting: Trim includes friction blades to mount securely to housing. OPTICS 800-1000lm: Each luminaire includes field changeable optics (26° spot, 36° narrow flood and 55° flood - preinstalled). Premium 15° and 25° TIR optics are also available. 1500-2500lm: Each luminaire includes field changeable TIR optics (30° spot, 45° narrow flood - preinstalled and 65° flood). ELECTRICAL Lumens / Wattage: 800lm / 14W, 1000lm / 14W, 1500lm / 20W, 2000lm / 24W, 2500lm / 28W Color Temperature: 2700K, 3000K, 3500K, 4000K, 5000K Color Rendering Index: 90+CRI Operating Temperature: Specified by housing Lifetime: 50,000 hours @ L70 Comfort Dim: Comfort Dim color tunes the temperature from a bright 3100K, to a romantic and comfortable 2000K on a gradual, even curve. Available in 800lm only. Dimming: Specified by housing COMPATIBLE HOUSINGS Luminaires are compatible with respective Iolite housings manufactured by Nora Lighting. CATALOG NO. DESCRIPTION LUMENS / WATTAGE NHIOICD-48 ICAT New Construction 800-1000lm / 14W NHIOICDCP-48 Chicago Plenum 800-1000lm / 14W NHRIOIC-48 ICAT Remodel 800-1000lm / 14W NHIOICD-415 ICAT New Construction 1500lm / 20W NHIOICDCP-415 Chicago Plenum 1500lm / 20W NHIOICD-420 ICAT New Construction 2000lm / 24W NHIOICDCP-420 Chicago Plenum 2000lm / 24W NHIOICD-425 ICAT New Construction 2500lm / 28W NHIOICDCP-425 Chicago Plenum 2500lm / 28W Accessories: Luminaires can accommodate (1) hex louver and (1) translucent deco collar or opaque snoot, no accessory holder is required, see accessories page. Flush mount mud ring is available to give the appearance of a trimless, compatible with new construction housing only. LABELS AND LISTINGS ·cULus Listed for Damp Locations ·ENERGY STAR certied ·5-Year Limited Warranty ·RoHS Compliant ·Certied to the high ecacy requirements of California Title 24 JA8-2019 DAMP WARRANTY LIMITEDYEAR5 GREEN COMMITTED TO o Recreate the Sunset with LED omfortDim® CRI90+ COMPLIANT 24TITLE RoHS COMPLIANT 4" Iolite Round Adjustable Gimbal - Dedicated Housing Required Trim Type Color Temperature Finish Lumens / Wattage NIO-4RG = Round Adjustable Gimbal 50X = 5000K* CDX = Comfort Dim† BB = Black BZ = Bronze MPW = Matte Powder White NN = Natural Metal WW = White (blank) = 800lm / 14W 27X = 2700K 30X = 3000K 35X = 3500K 40X = 4000K 50X = 5000K /10 = 1000lm / 14W /HL = 1500-2500lm (varies by housing) * 5000K LED modules in 800lm are while supplies last † Comfort Dim available in 800lm only and 1” Iolite uses a different dimming curve than 2" & 4" Iolite NIO-4RG Round Adjustable Gimbal Adjustability: New Construction: 45° (800-1000lm) / 28° (1500-2500lm) Remodel: 45° (800-1000lm) 4-⁄" 3-⁄" Housing Type NHIOICD-48 = ICAT New Construction / 800-1000lm / 14W NHIOICDCP-48 = Chicago Plenum / 800-1000lm / 14W NHRIOIC-48 = ICAT Remodel / 800-1000lm / 14W NHIOICD-415 = ICAT New Construction / 1500lm / 20W NHIOICDCP-415 = Chicago Plenum / 1500lm / 20W NHIOICD-420 = ICAT New Construction / 2000lm / 24W NHIOICDCP-420 = Chicago Plenum / 2000lm / 24W NHIOICD-425 = ICAT New Construction / 2500lm / 28W NHIOICDCP-425 = Chicago Plenum / 2500lm / 28W Compatible Housings PRODUCT IMAGES & DIMENSIONS BB Black BZ Bronze MPW Matte Powder White NN Natural Metal WW White ECO 3" LED DOWNLIGHT PROJECT: TYPE: NOTE: ED3AIC, ED3ANC, ED3NC, ED3RM ED3LAIC, ED3LANC, ED3LNIC, ED3LRIC ED3SNIC 14508 Nelson Ave. City of Industry, CA 91744 • tel: 626.336.4511 • fax: 626.330.4266 • www.csllighting.com ©2022 Creative Systems Lighting, A Division of Troy-CSL Lighting, Inc. All rights reserved. Subject to change without notice. Patent: csllighting.com/patents 1 / 14 SPEC-00272 NEW ECO, 3”, V-7.1, UPDATED 12/29/2022 SILENT VU™ OPTICS TECHNOLOGY OPTICS 50° Installed, 10°, 30°, 80° available ADJUSTABLE 0° to 45° tilt (Adjustable housings only) MEDIA Clear, Solite, Frosted, Linear Spread POWER SUPPLY INPUT VOLTAGE 120/277V, 50/60Hz DIMMING TRIAC, ELV, 0-10V, dims to 1% SERVICABILITY Below Ceiling Access HOUSING INSTALLATION •New Construction includes (2) galvanized steel adjustable hanger bars •Remodel option available • 5/8” ~ 2” ceiling thickness •Min Plenum Height: 2½” Shallow •Ceiling Material: Drywall, T-bar grid •Steel junction box with up to (4) ½" knockouts •AIC, NIC, RIC, SNIC models are Air Tight •AIC, SNIC models are CCEA compliant. (Note: polycell spray-in foam insulation must be kept 3" from housing) TRIM OPTIONS •Fixed or Adjustable •Round or Square •Standard or Trimless •Wall Wash •Wet Location TRIM COLORS •White •Black •Champagne •Champagne w/ White Flange •Black w/ White Flange •Silver w/ White Flange LED LIGHT ENGINE RATED WATTAGE 20.1W, 13.4W, 11.3W DELIVERED LUMENS Up to 1929 lm EFFICACY Up to 108 LPW CCT @ 90CRI 2700K, 3000K, 3500K, 4000K, Warm Dim COLOR QUALITY 90+ CRI, 2-Step SDCM LED LIFETIME 55,000 hours @ L90 DELIVERED LUMENS MATRIX ED3 (20.1W)10° Optic 30° Optic 50° Optic 80° Optic 2700K (90CRI)1669 lm 1744 lm 1592 lm 1125 lm 3000K (90CRI)1803 lm 1884 lm 1720 lm 1216 lm 3500K (90CRI)1846 lm 1929 lm 1761 lm 1244 lm 4000K (90CRI)1900 lm 1985 lm 1812 lm 1281 lm ED3 NIC, RIC (13.4W)10° Optic 30° Optic 50° Optic 80° Optic Warm Dim (98 CRI, R9>90)868 lm 938 lm 846 lm 604 lm ED3 AIC, ANC (20.1W)10° Optic 30° Optic 50° Optic 80° Optic Warm Dim (98 CRI, R9>90)1195 lm 1291 lm 1165 lm 832 lm ED3L (11.3W)10° Optic 30° Optic 50° Optic 80° Optic 2700K (90CRI)1061 lm 1108 lm 1012 lm 715 lm 3000K (90CRI)1146 lm 1198 lm 1093 lm 773 lm 3500K (90CRI)1173 lm 1226 lm 1119 lm 791 lm 4000K (90CRI)1207 lm 1262 lm 1152 lm 814 lm ED3S (13.4W)10° Optic 30° Optic 50° Optic 80° Optic 2700K (90CRI)1214 lm 1269 lm 1158 lm 819 lm 3000K (90CRI)1312 lm 1371 lm 1252 lm 885 lm 3500K (90CRI)1343 lm 1403 lm 1281 lm 905 lm 4000K (90CRI)1382 lm 1445 lm 1319 lm 932 lm Warm Dim (98 CRI, R9>90)868 lm 938 lm 846 lm 604 lm LISTINGS AND WARRANTY cULus Listed UL Listed for Damp Location (All Styles) IC Rated and Non IC Rated Available Five (5) years limited warranty ASTM E283 Certied Airtight (AIC, NIC, RIC, SNIC Models) UL Listed for Wet Location (Wet Location Trim Style) CCEA (Chicago Plenum) Approved (AIC, SNIC Models) CA Title 24-JA8 Compliant (AIC, NIC, RIC, SNIC Models) ED3ANC, ED3LANC ED3RM, ED3LRIC ED3SNIC ED3AIC, ED3LAIC ED3NC, ED3LNIC SCALE: 1' = 1'-0" 1 16 RLM-Catalog_2022-V2 page 58-59 A- E101SCALE: 1' = 1'-0" 2 East Wall G A- E101SCALE: 1' = 1'-0" 3 East Wall G A- E101 SCALE: 1' = 1'-0" 4 East Wall G A- E101SCALE: 1' = 1'-0" 5 East Wall G A- E101 Light at the property line < .5 Foot Candles as per code. The existing lighting is a mix of jelly jars and exposed lamps. 27 March 2023 SHEET TITLE INTEGRATED DESIGN TEAM PROJECT NO: MODEL FILE: DRAWN BY: COPYRIGHT: SHEET 64 A- E102 Jeffrey H Woodruff 312_W_Hyman_03312023.pln Project No. 116 /Users/jeffrey/Documents/Cloud Hill/Rainbow/structural/312_W_Hyman_03312023.plnPowder Day Skiiing, LLC, David A Tarrab Mees Electrical Cut Sheets Exterior 312 W Hyman Ave 312 W Hyman Ave Lots P+Q, Block 46 Aspen CO 81611 USA/ Pitkin County UGB, City of Aspen 312 W Hyman Ave Aspen CO 81611 USA Account # R000145 Parcel ID # 273512464006 Landscape Architect Jennifer M. Dolecki-Smith, RLA Escape Garden Design, LLC Civil Grading and Drainage Jay Engstrom, P.E. Crystal River Civil, LLC Structural Engineer Brian Rossiter, P.E. bwr.pe Contractor COA- HPO Site Visit08/22/21 Jeffrey H. Woodruff AIA, LEED AP Cloud Hill Design, LLC Snowmass CO 81654 USA COA- HPC Conceptual02/26/22 COA- HPC Conceptual04/27/22 COA- HPC Final07/27/22 COA- City Council Call Up10/12/22 COA- HPC Final04/12/23 TESLA.COM/ENERGY POWERWALL Tesla Powerwall is a fully-integrated AC battery system for residential or light commercial use. Its rechargeable lithium-ion battery pack provides energy storage for solar self-consumption, time-based control, and backup. Powerwall’s electrical interface provides a simple connection to any home or building. Its revolutionary compact design achieves market-leading energy density and is easy to install, enabling owners to quickly realize the benefits of reliable, clean power. PERFORMANCE SPECIFICATIONS AC Voltage (Nominal)120/240 V Feed-In Type Split Phase Grid Frequency 60 Hz Total Energy 14 kWh Usable Energy 13.5 kWh Real Power, max continuous 5 kW (charge and discharge) Real Power, peak (10 s, o -grid/backup)7 kW (charge and discharge) Apparent Power, max continuous 5.8 kVA (charge and discharge) Apparent Power, peak (10 s, o -grid/backup)7.2 kVA (charge and discharge) Maximum Supply Fault Current 10 kA Maximum Output Fault Current 32 A Overcurrent Protection Device 30 A Imbalance for Split-Phase Loads 100% Power Factor Output Range +/– 1.0 adjustable Power Factor Range (full-rated power)+/– 0.85 Internal Battery DC Voltage 50 V Round Trip E ciency1,3 90% Warranty 10 years ENVIRONMENTAL SPECIFICATIONS Operating Temperature –20°C to 50°C (–4°F to 122°F) Recommended Temperature 0°C to 30°C (32°F to 86°F) Operating Humidity (RH)Up to 100%, condensing Storage Conditions –20°C to 30°C (–4°F to 86°F) Up to 95% RH, non-condensing State of Energy (SoE): 25% initial Maximum Elevation 3000 m (9843 ft) Environment Indoor and outdoor rated Enclosure Type NEMA 3R Ingress Rating IP67 (Battery & Power Electronics) IP56 (Wiring Compartment) Wet Location Rating Yes Noise Level @ 1m < 40 dBA at 30°C (86°F) MECHANICAL SPECIFICATIONS Dimensions1 1150 mm x 755 mm x 147 mm (45.3 in x 29.6 in x 5.75 in) Weight1 114 kg (251.3 lbs) Mounting options Floor or wall mount 1 Dimensions and weight di er slightly if manufactured before March 2019. 1 Values provided for 25°C (77°F), 3.3 kW charge/discharge power. 2 In Backup mode, grid charge power is limited to 3.3 kW. 3 AC to battery to AC, at beginning of life. COMPLIANCE INFORMATION Certifications UL 1642, UL 1741, UL 1973, UL 9540, IEEE 1547, UN 38.3 Grid Connection Worldwide Compatibility Emissions FCC Part 15 Class B, ICES 003 Environmental RoHS Directive 2011/65/EU Seismic AC156, IEEE 693-2005 (high) 2 4 6 5 3 8 1 7 753 mm (29.6 in) 147 mm (5.75 in) 1150 mm (45.3 in) Contact Tesla for additional information. ChargePoint Home Flex Specifications and Ordering Information Ordering Information Description Model Number Station and Cable Model 16A-50A, NEMA 6-50 plug, 7010.4 mm (23') Charging Cable 16A-50A, NEMA 14-50 plug, 7010.4 mm (23') Charging Cable CPH50-NEMA6-50-L23 CPH50-NEMA14-50-L23 Replacement Cable 7010.4 mm (23') Charging Cable CPH50Cable-T1-50A-L23-F ChargePoint® Home Flex                                   SunPower Maxeon Solar Cell Technology Fundamentally Different. And Better.  Cell efficiencies of over 25%  Delivers leading reliability3  Patented solid metal foundation prevents breakage and corrosion As sustainable as the energy it produces.  Achieved the #1 ranking on the Silicon Valley Toxics Coalition’s Solar Scorecard for 3 years running  SunPower modules can contribute to your business’s LEED certification4 A       SunPower®Maxeon®Technology SunPower® Maxeon® cell-based panels maximize energy production and savings by combining industry-leading power, efficiency, and durability with the most comprehensive power, product, and service warranty in the industry.1,2   Highest Power Density Available SunPower’s new Maxeon Gen 5 cell is 65% larger than prior generations, delivering the most powerful cell and highest efficiency panel in residential solar.2 The result is more power per square meter than any commercially available solar.1 Maximum Lifetime Energy and Savings Designed to deliver up to 54% more energy from the same space over the first 25 years in real-world conditions like partial shade and high temperatures.1 25-year EnergyYears of Operation Up to 54% More Lifetime Energy 0510152025 150% 140% 130% 120% 110% 100% 90% 80% 70% 60% Conventional Panel SunPower A-Series Panels Best Reliability, Best Warranty SunPower technology is proven to last and we stand behind our panels with the industry’s most comprehensive 25-year Combined Power, Product and Service Warranty. sunpower.com  390–400 W Residential A-Series Panels Color samples are for reference only. Actual product color may vary slightly.Nordic Products Inc. reserves the right to change any specifications without notice. Shadow Eclipse Coastal DriftSMOOTHNATURAL SERIES PERMASHELL™ COLORS Black Charcoal Mahogany PERMAWOOD™ CABINET COLORS SQUARENatural Cedar (upgrade)ROUNDDIMENSIONS Seating 6 person Diameter 84 in (213 cm) Depth 38.5 in (89 cm) Weight (Dry) 400 lbs (181 kg) Operating Capacity 330 gal (1249 L) JETS Total Jets 30 5” Nordic Star™ Directional Whirlpool 2 5” Nordic Star™ Dual Rotational 3 3” Nordic Star™ Directional 3 3” Nordic Star™ Dual Rotational 4 2” Nordic Star™ Directional 17 1” Ozone Ready Jet (Ozonator Optional)1 EQUIPMENT Vol ts 220v Amps 40a Control Pad 4 button Topside w/LED Display Insulation: Foam (Standard) Nordic Wrap (Optional) Heater 4kw Light Footwell LED (Standard) Mood Lighting Package (Optional) Pump (1) 3hp Continuous Duty Bluetooth Stereo Optional Upgrade CROWN XL CLASSIC SERIES Shell: Eclipse | Cabinet: Charcoal Shell: Eclipse DaVinci HeatSmart™ Heat Exchanger Page 1 of 7 17602218 - 3/18/2022 Travis Industries, Inc. Compatibility Notes This kit with any DaVinci or Maestro fireplace with TouchSmart™ controls. Overview The heat exchanger is designed to circulate room air through the fireplace to extract heat from the exhaust stream and deliver that heat back into the room. The heat exchanger is installed in line with the venting and air from a blower is routed through the exchanger and back into the room through a register. Install the heat exchanger when venting the appliance. Make sure all work on ducts is complete and sealed before installing drywall. Packing List  Heat Exchanger Vent section  Blower Assembly with Strain Relief  Blower Grill  Heat Exchanger Lead (2 wire Molex)  Register Boot - 6” Dia. to 6” x 12” (153mm Dia. to 153mm x 305mm)  Output Register (12” x 6”) (305mm x 153mm)  33’(10.06M) of 6”(153mm) Diameter Duct (U.L. 181)  10” starter collar (for use with inline 180 fan only) 5 312 W Hyman Cold Sourced Heat Pump- Manual J A- E102 27 March 2023 Specifications for 312 West Hyman Part 1- Core and Shell 07 Thermal and Moisture Protection 08 Windows and Doors 13 Specialties- Core and Shell 15 Mechanical- Core and Shell 16 Electrical- Core and Shell Part 2- Finish 10 Specialties- Interior Only 11 Equipment- Appliances, Interior Only 12 Furnishings- Interior Only 15 Mechanical- Interior Only 16 Electrical- Interior Only 22 Plumbing - Interior Only As per currently adopted IRC Section R910 Snow shed design. Roofs shall be designed so that they do not shed ice and snow onto adjoining properties or potentially occupied areas such as a walkway, stairway, alley, deck, pedestrian and vehicular exit from buildings or areas where there is potential for personal injury or property damage and areas directly above or in front of gas utility or electric utility meters. Section 1513 Snow shed design. Roofs shall be designed so that they do not shed ice and snow onto adjacent properties and potentially occupied areas such as a walkway, stairway, alley, deck, pedestrian and vehicular exit from buildings or areas where there is potential for personal injury or property damage and areas directly above or in front of gas utility or electric utility meters. Complying with Chapter 7 Historic Preservation Guidelines Gutters, Downspouts, Snowstops, and Snow Fences Gutters and downspouts are used to divert water away from a structure. Without this drainage system, water may splash off the roof onto exterior walls and run along the foundation of the building. Snowstops and snow fences are used to protect inhabitants and the building from the sudden snow avalanches that rip off architectural details and can cause serious injury. Gutters can be seen in some 19th century photos of historic buildings and are more common on AspenModern structures. Overall, the visual impact of these functional elements should be minimized. 7.10 Design gutters so that their visibility on the structure is minimized to the extent possible. • Downspouts should be placed in locations that are not visible from the street if possible, or in locations that do not obscure architectural detailing on the building. • The material used for the gutters should be in character with the style of the building. Complying with IBC IBC 1504.6.1Gutter securement for low-slope roofs. Gutters that are used to secure the perimeter edge of the roof membrane on low-slope (less than 2:12 slope) built-up, modified bitumen, and single-ply roofs, shall be designed, constructed and installed to resist wind loads in accordance with Section 1609 and shall be tested in accordance with Test Methods G-1 and G-2 of SPRI GT-1. TEE-PANEL INSTALLATION DETAILS BERRIDGE MANUFACTURING COMPANY 800-669-0009 • www.Berridge.com DYNACLAD® BOX DOWNSPOUT DIMENSIONAL METALS, INC. WATER CONTROL DMI’s box downspouts are offered in sizes from 3"x4" to 11"x11" and lengths up to 32'. DMI offers a full line of accessories including, outlets, elbows, downspout straps, collector boxes and scuppers. Offered in a large variety of materials and colors: •Galvalume® (22 ga. & 24 ga.) •HDG-90 (20 ga.) •Stainless Steel (22 ga. & 24 ga.) •Aluminum (.050, .040, & .032) •RHEINZINK® (20 ga./1 mm, 22 ga./.8 mm, & 24 ga./.7 mm) •Copper (20 oz. & 16 oz.) www.dmimetals.com • 800.828.1510 • sales@dmimetals.com POP RIVET (1 PER SIDE) ELBOW DOWNSPOUT STRAP FASTENER DMI BOX DOWNSPOUT POP RIVET (4 PER DOWNSPOUT) POP RIVET (EIGHT PER OUTLET) AND SEAL WITH NOVA LFEX OR EQUAL GUTTER OUTLET DMI GUTTER 10072019 Since 1988 Dimensional Metals, Inc. (DMI) has specialized in the manufacturing of architectural metal roof and wall panel systems as well as fabricated architectural sheet metal for the construction industry. We are backed by decades of proven metal envelope design, dependable Technical Field Services, and an Engineering Department delivering sustainable solutions. You are sure to find the product that will best enhance your design. 24 GAGE 22 GAGE .032 ALUM. .040 ALUM. .050 ALUM. .063 ALUM. GALVALUME GALVALUME 3003/3105 H14 3003/3105 H14 3003/3105 H14 3003/3105 H14 KYNAR 500 KYNAR 500 KYNAR 500 KYNAR 500 KYNAR 500 KYNAR 500 AGED COPPER*●● BEIGE ●●●●● BRITE RED*●●● BROWN ●●● BURGUNDY ●● CHAMPAGNE*●● CHARCOAL GREY ●●● CLASSIC BRONZE ●●● COBALT BLUE ●● COLONIAL RED ●● DARK BRONZE ●●●●●● DOVE GREY ●●●● EVERGREEN ●●● HARTFORD GREEN ●● HEMLOCK GREEN ●● LEAF GREEN ●● MATTE BLACK ●●● METALLIC COPPER*●● METALLIC SILVER*●● MUSKET GREY ●●● PATINA COPPER ●●● PUTTY ●●●●● ROYAL BLUE ●●● SANDSTONE ●●●● SEAPORT ●● SLATE BLUE ●● SLATE GREY ●●●●● SPARTAN BRONZE ●●● STONE ●●● TERRA COTTA ●● WEATHERED ZINC*●● WHITE ●●●●●● COLOR (IN ALPHABETICAL ORDER) DYNACLAD® STOCKING COLOR/MATERIAL PROJECT NAME: ARCHITECT: INSTALLING CONTRACTOR: GENERAL CONTRACTOR: SPECIFICATION SECTION: SUBSTRATE 24 ga. Galvalume® 22 ga. Galvalume® 20 ga. HDG-90 24 ga. Stainless Steel 22 ga. Stainless Steel 16 oz. Copper 20 oz. Copper EMBOSSED: STANDARD FINISHES (NA ON COPPER, STAINLESS STEEL, & MILL FINISH) DynaClad® PVDF: Acrylic Coated Galvalume (Acrylume®) RHEINZINK® Patina: Clear Anodized Aluminum PREMIUM FINISHES* WARRANTY Consult DMI for minimum quantities, upcharges, set up fees and extended lead times *Premium Colors subject to minimum quantities, extended lead times and upcharges. Consult DMI for details. .032 Aluminum .040 Aluminum .050 Aluminum 24 ga. (.7mm) RHEINZINK® 22 ga. (.8mm) RHEINZINK® 20 ga. (1mm) RHEINZINK® DynaClad® Metallic PVDF: DynaClad® Brite Red PVDF DynaClad® Standard Color PVDF w/ Clearcoat: DynaClad® Metallic Color PVDF w/ Clearcoat: Custom Color: DynaClad® Paint Finish Galvalume® 20 Year - 6 Month (Substrate) Aluminum Sheet 2 Year (Substrate) Non-Stock colors available subject to minimum quantities, additional lead times and upcharges. Custom Colors available. * Denotes Premium Color - subject to additional costs. DYNACLAD® BOX DOWNSPOUT DIMENSIONAL METALS, INC. " " " " Rectangle Square ____ Downspout Outlets ____ Downspout Straps ____ Downspout Elbow (Specify Angle: ____ ˚) *See custom order form for additional items \ DynaClad® Water Control BOX DOWNSPOUT Page ____ of _____ PROJECT NAME CUSTOMER P.O. NO. 58 Klema Drive North - Reynoldsburg, OH 43068 - phone: 800.828.1510 - fax: 866.709.3235 CUSTOMER APPROVAL APPROVED FOR FABRICATION APPROVED AS NOTEDx AUTHORIZED CUSTOMER SIGNATURE DATE PRINT NAME PHONE www.dmimetals.com NOTES Sizes are to be no less than 3”x4” and no greater than 11”x11” 3”x4” not available in .050, .040 or 20 ga. All dimensions are to be approved by DMI Available in up to 32'-0" lengths 10072019 " "" Material is to be fabricated to dimensions as listed on this form. Responsibility of measurement accuracy and completeness is by the submitter. You are agreeing to DMI’s Terms and Conditions of Sale as outlined on http://www.dmimetals.com/termsandconditions. DIMENSIONAL METALS, INC. DMI BOX DOWNSPOUT RECTANGLE DMI BOX DOWNSPOUT SQUARE " ____ Total LNFT Quantity Length ____ ____' ____" ____ ____' ____" ____ ____' ____" ____ ____' ____" MATERIAL Aluminum: ______ Galvalume®: _______ HDG-90: 20 ga. Stainless Steel: ______ Copper: ______ RHEINZINK®: ________________ QUANTITIES FINISH DynaClad® PVDF: _______________ DynaClad® PVDF w/ Clear Coat*: ________________ Acrylic Coated Galvalume® (ACRYLUME®) RHEINZINK® Patina: ________________ Clear Anodized Aluminum Custom Color: ________________ *Premium Colors subject to minimum quantities, extended lead times and upcharges. Consult DMI for details. ACCESSORIES NOTES (If staggered sizes are required please notate here) DYNACLAD® BOX GUTTER I STYLE H STYLE G STYLE F STYLE D STYLE A STYLE DYNACLAD® BOX GUTTERDIMENSIONAL METALS, INC. WATER CONTROL DMI’s box gutters are offered in six standard SMACNA profiles. Custom profiles and lengths up to 32' are available. DMI offers a full line of accessories including, internal support brackets, custom under brackets, mitered corners, end caps, splice plates, expansion joints, outlets, downspouts, elbows, and downspout straps. Offered in a large variety of materials and colors: •Galvalume® (22 ga. & 24 ga.) •HDG-90 (20 ga.) •Stainless Steel (22 ga. & 24 ga.) •Aluminum (.050, .040, & .032) •RHEINZINK® (20 ga./1 mm, 22 ga./.8 mm, & 24 ga./.7 mm) •Copper (20 oz. & 16 oz.) www.dmimetals.com • 800.828.1510 • sales@dmimetals.com UNDER BRACKET OPTIONAL FLANGE DMI BOX GUTTER (D STYLE SHOWN) GUTTER OUTLET POP RIVET (EIGHT PER OUTLET) AND SEAL WITH NOVA FLEX OR EQUAL FASTENER GUTTER STRAP CONTINUOUS NOVA FLEX OR EQUAL END CAP POP RIVET 04012019 Since 1988 Dimensional Metals, Inc. (DMI) has specialized in the manufacturing of architectural metal roof and wall panel systems as well as fabricated architectural sheet metal for the construction industry. We are backed by decades of proven metal envelope design, dependable Technical Field Services, and an Engineering Department delivering sustainable solutions. You are sure to find the product that will best enhance your design. 24 GAGE 22 GAGE .032 ALUM. .040 ALUM. .050 ALUM. .063 ALUM. GALVALUME GALVALUME 3003/3105 H14 3003/3105 H14 3003/3105 H14 3003/3105 H14 KYNAR 500 KYNAR 500 KYNAR 500 KYNAR 500 KYNAR 500 KYNAR 500 AGED COPPER*●● BEIGE ●●●●● BRITE RED*●●● BROWN ●●● BURGUNDY ●● CHAMPAGNE*●● CHARCOAL GREY ●●● CLASSIC BRONZE ●●● COBALT BLUE ●● COLONIAL RED ●● DARK BRONZE ●●●●●● DOVE GREY ●●●● EVERGREEN ●●● HARTFORD GREEN ●● HEMLOCK GREEN ●● LEAF GREEN ●● MATTE BLACK ●●● METALLIC COPPER*●● METALLIC SILVER*●● MUSKET GREY ●●● PATINA COPPER ●●● PUTTY ●●●●● ROYAL BLUE ●●● SANDSTONE ●●●● SEAPORT ●● SLATE BLUE ●● SLATE GREY ●●●●● SPARTAN BRONZE ●●● STONE ●●● TERRA COTTA ●● WEATHERED ZINC*●● WHITE ●●●●●● COLOR (IN ALPHABETICAL ORDER) DYNACLAD® STOCKING COLOR/MATERIAL PROJECT NAME: ARCHITECT: INSTALLING CONTRACTOR: GENERAL CONTRACTOR: SPECIFICATION SECTION: SUBSTRATE 24 ga. Galvalume® 22 ga. Galvalume® 20 ga. HDG-90 24 ga. Stainless Steel 22 ga. Stainless Steel 16 oz. Copper 20 oz. Copper EMBOSSED: STANDARD FINISHES (NA ON COPPER, STAINLESS STEEL, & MILL FINISH) DynaClad® PVDF: Acrylic Coated Galvalume (Acrylume®) RHEINZINK® Patina: Clear Anodized Aluminum PREMIUM FINISHES* WARRANTY Consult DMI for minimum quantities, upcharges, set up fees and extended lead times *Premium Colors subject to minimum quantities, extended lead times and upcharges. Consult DMI for details. .032 Aluminum .040 Aluminum .050 Aluminum 24 ga. (.7mm) RHEINZINK® 22 ga. (.8mm) RHEINZINK® 20 ga. (1mm) RHEINZINK® DynaClad® Metallic PVDF: DynaClad® Brite Red PVDF DynaClad® Standard Color PVDF w/ Clearcoat: DynaClad® Metallic Color PVDF w/ Clearcoat: Custom Color: DynaClad® Paint Finish Galvalume® 20 Year - 6 Month (Substrate) Aluminum Sheet 2 Year (Substrate) Non-Stock colors available subject to minimum quantities, additional lead times and upcharges. Custom Colors available. * Denotes Premium Color - subject to additional costs. I StyleH StyleG StyleF StyleD StyleA Style OPTIONAL ROOF FLANGE: DYNACLAD® BOX GUTTER DIMENSIONAL METALS, INC. Installation to be completed in accordance with manufacturer's written specifications and installation instructions.1.See spec sheet or contact manufacturer for detailed material, finishes, and configuration options.2.Contact manufacturer for detailed layout.3.Do not scale drawings.4.Subject to change without notice.5.For patent information, visit our6. 3 3/16" 3 1/2" 4 3/16" 1 1/8"THRU 13/16" TARGET PATCH FLASHING(NOT INCLUDED) 1:5 Cut Sheet - PD90-AL 10/15/2020Scale: 289 Harrel StreetMorrisville, VT 05661Phone: 1.888.766.4273Fax: 1.888.766.9994Email: Info@alpinesnowguards.com Patent Page. Installation to be completed in accordance with manufacturer's written specifications and installation instructions.1.See spec sheet or contact manufacturer for detailed material, finishes, and configuration options.2.Contact manufacturer for detailed layout.3.Do not scale drawings.4.Subject to change without notice.5.For patent information, visit our6. 289 Harrel Street, Morrisville, VT 05661 • Toll Free Phone 1.888.766.4273 • Toll Free Fax 1.888.766.9994 info@alpinesnowguards.com A Division of Vermont Slate & Copper Services, Inc. PD90-AL Snow Guard Installation Instructions Typical Roof Types: •New/existing membrane Installation – Base Plate: 1.Place the base plate on top of the finished membrane roof. Note: The threaded studs on the base plate are not centered. Align the base plate so the studs and the three fastener holes are on the upslope end of the base plate. 2.Fasten base plate to the substructure (usually wood blocking is used for this bracket) using the appropriate fasteners for the type and thickness of the decking. Make certain that the base plate cannot shift. Note: Wood blocking must measure 2” larger than the perimeter of the base plate. Thickness of the wood blocking will vary, but must match the thickness of the installed insulation. 3.Consult with an engineer, snow guard manufacturer or fastener company to determine the appropriate fastener required for attaching the base plate to the substructure. Installation - Membrane Flashing of Base Plate: Note: Use an acceptable piece and size of flashing material to cover the base plate in a method acceptable to the membrane manufacturer. This is comm only referred to as a Target Patch. The size will be a minimum of 12” x 12”. Each membrane manufacturer has specific requirements that must be met. 1.Cut two small holes in membrane flashing to fit tightly over threaded studs. 2.Before installing flashing, apply a generous amount of an architect-approved sealant around threaded studs. 3.Apply flashing over base plate and seal the perimeter of the flashing to the deck. The threaded studs are now the only part of the base plate exposed. Note: Due to the sealant applied around the studs, there may be bleed out at this opening. When the bracket is installed and tightened, this bleed out will help to create a watertight compression seal. Installation – PD90-AL Snow Guard Bracket: 1.Install snow guard bracket over the threaded studs on the base plate. The bracket will be centered on the base plate when installed properly. 2.Place one bonded washer over each threaded stud and press them against the bracket. 3.Thread one nut down each stud and tighten. 4.Install Pipes, Couplings, End Caps, and End Collars (refer to Pipe-Style Installation Instructions). 289 Harrel Street, Morrisville, VT 05661 • Toll Free Phone 1.888.766.4273 • Toll Free Fax 1.888.766.9994 info@alpinesnowguards.com A Division of Vermont Slate & Copper Services, Inc. Snow guard layout for pipe style brackets: •Contact the manufacturer for detailed layout. •First row of snow guards is installed above outer most wall or support of the building. The standard layout is shown below. For roofs with less than 24/12 pitch and less than 75 psf ground snow load you will need approximately six (6) PD90-AL snow guards per square. Contact manufacturer for other conditions. Document Version 10.20.2020 07 72 53 Snow Guards AWD Architectural Windows & Doors, Inc. March 15, 2023 Jeffrey, We appreciate the opportunity to bid Loewen windows and doors for the 312 W Hyman Ave. Residence project. Please reference the following for sizes, quantities, and options. Base bid: •Bid to Loewen’s standard and custom sizes. •Bid standard Primed Wood exterior. •Bid Douglas Fir wood species •Standard Bronze screen channel on windows •Standard Bronze “Tango” hardware on windows. •Standard Matte Black “Dallas” Hardware on swing doors •Black 4x4 concealed ball bearing hinges on swing doors. •Screen material “Better Vue”. Windows •Dual Low E272/I89 glazing. •Interior square glazing stops. •Black Stainless Steel Spacer Bar between glass. •Capillary tubes on all windows and doors. •6 11/16” jambs. •See attached for uvalues, SHGC, VT, etc… •Fixed windows bid as direct sets. •Sliding door exterior screens bid as Midnight Bronze - Confirm •All sliding windows specified bid either as an awning or casement. •Please note: did not bid flush wood exterior doors (Off Kitchen). Sincerely, Mike Dollahan 0097 County Road 114 Glenwood Springs, Colorado 81601 (970) 928-9314 / (970) 384-0023 Velux Skylights FCM with solar darkening Grey shades 3/24/23, 5:11 PMGlass Performance Data | Cardinal Glass Industries Page 1 of 1about:blank Glass Performance Data | Cardinal Glass Industries Product Visible Light Fade Transmission Solar U-Factor Panes Configuration Airspace (mm)Transmittance Ext Reflectance Int Reflectance UV Tdw-ISO Heat Gain Coefficient Air Argon 2 Clear/Di89 6.5 79%14%14%53%70%0.69 0.33 0.28 2 Clear/Di89 8.0 79%14%14%53%70%0.70 0.30 0.26 2 E180/i89 6.5 77%15%14%27%61%0.62 0.32 0.27 2 E180/i89 8.0 77%15%14%27%61%0.62 0.29 0.24 2 E180ESC/i89 6.5 78%15%14%24%60%0.64 0.32 0.27 2 E180ESC/i89 8.0 78%15%14%24%60%0.64 0.29 0.24 2 E240/Clear 8.0 40%14%11%16%35%0.26 0.36 0.29 2 E240/i89 6.5 39%14%10%15%34%0.25 0.31 0.27 2 E240/i89 8.0 39%14%10%15%34%0.25 0.28 0.24 2 E270/Clear 8.0 70%12%13%14%52%0.37 0.36 0.29 2 E270/i89 6.5 68%12%13%14%50%0.36 0.31 0.26 2 E270/i89 8.0 68%12%13%14%50%0.36 0.28 0.23 2 E272/Clear 8.0 72%11%12%16%55%0.42 0.36 0.29 2 E272/i89 6.5 70%11%11%16%53%0.41 0.31 0.26 2 E272/i89 8.0 70%11%11%16%53%0.41 0.28 0.23 2 E340/Clear 8.0 39%13%16%2%27%0.19 0.35 0.28 2 E340/i89 6.5 38%13%15%2%26%0.18 0.31 0.26 2 E340/i89 8.0 38%13%15%2%26%0.18 0.28 0.23 2 E366/Clear 8.0 65%11%12%5%43%0.28 0.35 0.28 2 E366/i89 6.5 63%11%12%5%42%0.27 0.31 0.26 2 E366/i89 8.0 63%11%12%5%42%0.27 0.28 0.23 LoE2­272 Glass | Cardinal Glass Industries http://www.cardinalcorp.com/products/coated­glass/loe2­272­glass/1/4 LoĒ²-272 Glass Who says you can’t do anything about the weather? Cardinal LoĒ²-272® glass delivers year-round comfort in all types of weather. In winter, it reflects heat back into the room. In summer, it rejects the sun’s heat and damaging UV rays. Cardinal LoĒ²-272 is very similar to our LoĒ²-270® glass, only with a little more light transmittance, while LoĒ²-270 offers slightly more solar control. Cold or hot outside, Cardinal comfort inside. Regardless of where your home is located, choosing windows that provide you with the highest level of comfort and energy savings year-round is extremely important. And choosing the right glass for your windows is the most important factor in that decision. Go beyond ordinary low-e glass. Let LoĒ²-272 help you handle the weather – any weather. Frigid outside, cozy inside. During cold weather, the insulating effect of your windows has a direct impact on how your rooms feel. Typically, 75% of the exposed surface of a window is glass, and the temperature of the room-side of the glass directly affects the air temperature in the room. The better insulated the window glass, the warmer your room will be. In fact, the Efficient Windows Collaborative (www.efficientwindows.org) suggests that when glass surface temperatures fall below 52°F, there is a risk of thermal discomfort. To maintain the best comfort during the winter, select a glass product that produces surface temperatures that will stay above this point during the coldest outdoor conditions. Inside glass and outside temperatures. The table below compares the room-side center of glass temperatures of different glass types against two different winter conditions. INSIDE GLASS AND OUTSIDE TEMPERATURES PRODUCT Single-pane clear Double-pane clear Ordinary low-e (air fill) LoĒ²-272 (air fill) LoĒ²-272 (argon fill) OUTSIDE TEMP -20°F (-30°C) 0°F (-19°C) 37°F (2°C) 46°F (7°C) 49°F (9°C) 52°F (10°C) OUTSIDE TEMP +20°F (-10°C) 31°F (-3°C) 51°F (9°C) 57°F (13°C) 58°F (14°C) 60°F (15°C) LoĒ²-272 Glass has U-Value .30 Double Glazed with air space, black spacer as per schedule Cardinal LoĒ-272 6 mm / 13.0 mm airspace / 6 mm LoE2­272 Glass | Cardinal Glass Industries http://www.cardinalcorp.com/products/coated­glass/loe2­272­glass/2/4 The superior insulating capability of Cardinal LoĒ²-272 is a key factor in the construction of comfortable windows for cold climates. The dramatic comfort improvement from windows with warm glass surfaces also means the relative humidity of the indoor air can be controlled and maintained properly. Proper humidity levels (not too much, not too little) will improve comfort and promote a healthier living environment. Solar control for just about the coolest windows under the sun. When the temperature is heading to the top of the thermometer, ordinary window glass simply welcomes in the heat. Cardinal LoĒ²-272, however, has been specially formulated to reject the sun’s heat and damaging rays and keep your home cool and comfortable. The patented LoĒ²-272 coating provides the best clarity and high performance low solar control. The end result of all this engineering is that Cardinal LoĒ²-272 provides the ultimate in comfort because it reduces window heat gain by nearly 50% when compared to ordinary glass. Glass Performance Summer Solar control for just about the coolest windows under the sun. PRODUCT Single-pane clear Double-pane clear Ordinary low-e (air fill) VISIBLE LIGHT TRANSMITTANCE 90% 82% 76% SOLAR HEAT GAIN COEFFICIENT 0.86 0.78 0.72 WINTER U-FACTOR ( AIR / ARGON ) 1.04/– 0.48/– 0.34/0.30 UV 0.71 0.58 0.50 FADING TRANSMISSION 0.84 0.75 0.68 !"#$%&’&’&()*+,)*-).)*&/)*,0 )*//U Value .30 LoE2­272 Glass | Cardinal Glass Industries 3/4 Note: All values calculated using Window 6.3. (See here and here for more information on glass optical data and the Windows 6.3 program.) Emittance of ordinary (pyrolitic) low-E is 0.16. Solar Heat Gain Coefficient – (SHGC) – The amount of solar radiation that enters a building as heat. The lower the number, the better the glazing is at preventing solar gain. Fading Transmission – The portion of energy transmitted in a spectral region from 300 to 600 nanometers. This region includes all of the ultraviolet energy and part of the visible spectrum, and will give the best representation of relative fading rates. The lower the number, the better the glass is for reducing fading potential of carpets and interior furnishings. U-Factor – This represents the heat flow rate through a window expressed in BTU/hr·ft²·°F, using winter night weather conditions of 0°F outside and 70°F inside. The smaller the number, the better the window system is at reducing heat loss. Cardinal actively supports and participates in the National Fenestration Rating Council (NFRC). Windows with LoĒ²-272 that are rated and certified by the NFRC can comply with Energy Star™ requirements for the northern and central regions of the country. Northern zone will likely require the addition of LoĒ-i89 on the 4th surface to comply with U-Factor requirements. (See https://www.energystar.gov/products/certified- products/detail/residential-windows-doors-and-skylights for more information on the Energy Star windows program.) Save energy with glass so smart, it can control your comfort. Although windows provide beautiful views and wonderful natural light, they can also account for up to 50% of the heating and cooling energy consumed in a home. In the winter, Cardinal LoĒ²-272 helps your home stay warm and cozy by blocking heat loss to the cold weather outside. In the summer, it keeps your home cool and comfortable by rejecting the sun’s heat and damaging rays. In short, it can save energy year around. * Thermostat settings are the largest variable in establishing the heating and cooling energy savings potential with window replacements. If you tolerate the discomfort from your current windows and don’t change thermostat settings with the weather, consider the savings suggested from the “Fixed Thermostat” column. If on the other hand you frequently adjust the thermostat, add space heaters to compensate for cold rooms, or close drapes/blinds to block the sun consider the additional savings suggested in the “Equal Comfort” column. Definitions http://www.cardinalcorp.com/products/coated-glass/loe2-272-glass/ LoE2­272 Glass | Cardinal Glass Industries http://www.cardinalcorp.com/products/coated­glass/loe2­272­glass/4/4 Savings values are average of multiple locations within climate zone. “Average” house as described in the Buildings Data Book at http://buildingsdatabook.eren.doe.gov/TableView.aspx?table=2.2.7 The model house is described as a mid-1970’s single-story dwelling with natural gas furnace, central air-conditioning, adequate insulation, and double-pane windows. Window orientation set as uniformly distributed on all sides to represent a neighborhood average and the total window area set to 15% of the floor area. Interior shading devices are presumed to be closed 50% of the time throughout the year. “Fixed Thermostat” conditions are 70°F for heating and 75°F for cooling. “Equal Comfort” thermostat settings determined using window thermal comfort research from the University of California at Berkeley (See report PDF). The existing double-pane windows used heat/cool thermostat setpoints of 72°F/74°F to match the comfort of LoĒ²-272 glass at 70°F/78°F. House heat/cool energy simulations used the Resfen program from Lawrence Berkeley National Lab (See this source). The difference is clear. Cardinal LoĒ²-272 is ideal for all weather conditions in most climates. In winter, it reflects heat back into rooms. In summer, its patented coating blocks 84% of the sun’s harmful ultraviolet rays and 59% of the sun’s heat. It even outperforms the tinted glass often used in warm climates. You can see out and the light shines in, with no heavy bronze or smoke colored tints to darken the personality of your home. LoĒ²-272 can be purchased in hurricane-resistant laminated glass in a variety of shapes and sizes. Modeling Conditions Heat/Cool portion of your energy bill: DOE estimates that in 2005 the average house spent $2,003 on utilities and that 43% of this total ($886) is for heating and cooling energy. (http://buildingsdatabook.eren.doe.gov/TableView.aspx?table=2.3.10). Color samples are for reference only. Actual product color may vary slightly. Nordic Products Inc. reserves the right to change any specifications without notice. Shadow Eclipse Coastal DriftSMOOTHNATURAL SERIES PERMASHELL™ COLORS Black Charcoal Mahogany PERMAWOOD™ CABINET COLORS SQUARENatural Cedar (upgrade)ROUNDDIMENSIONS Seating 6 person Diameter 84 in (213 cm) Depth 38.5 in (89 cm) Weight (Dry) 400 lbs (181 kg) Operating Capacity 330 gal (1249 L) JETS Total Jets 30 5” Nordic Star™ Directional Whirlpool 2 5” Nordic Star™ Dual Rotational 3 3” Nordic Star™ Directional 3 3” Nordic Star™ Dual Rotational 4 2” Nordic Star™ Directional 17 1” Ozone Ready Jet (Ozonator Optional)1 EQUIPMENT Volts 220v Amps 40a Control Pad 4 button Topside w/LED Display Insulation: Foam (Standard) Nordic Wrap (Optional) Heater 4kw Light Footwell LED (Standard) Mood Lighting Package (Optional) Pump (1) 3hp Continuous Duty Bluetooth Stereo Optional Upgrade CROWN XL CLASSIC SERIES Shell: Eclipse | Cabinet: Charcoal Shell: Eclipse Black Diamond Series – the New Standard in Personalised Comfort and Style Heatpump Covers – We Are the Heat Pump Cover Specialists We specialise in building custom covers for outdoor units of heat pumps so that they can seamlessly integrate with the appearance and architectural features of a home. Our product has been specifically developed for heat pumps. Our many years of development have been in close consultation with heat pump distributors and their support and knowledge ensures we can bring you a product tested and directly approved by them. We stand confident in our product so that you can continue to enjoy the efficiency heat pumps are known for. New Zealand Made – Tailor Made We make our covers to order here in New Zealand. From one-off residential customers, to body corporates, as well as architects and developers. We make covers to suit every project. What Makes Our Covers Unrivalled Our quality – we use sturdy aluminium with stainless steel fastenings and a quality powder coat finish. Our aluminium profiles are locally run and exclusive to us. Our design – we offer the full colour range from all of the top brands of powder coat. Every piece gets a comprehensive pre-treatment process to ensure your cover stands up to the elements for years to come. Clean, crisp lines and nicely proportioned aluminium profiles give our covers a sleek refined look. Our bracket systems mean you can mount it straight and it stays straight. The hardwood timber top on our premium model is hand detailed and oiled to elevate it to furniture status. Our performance – thorough testing and collected knowledge ensures we can provide you a way to hide and integrate your heat pump without hindering its performance. You Choose Both Colour and Style Our Standard Style cover comes with a colour matched, sturdy aluminium top. The look is clean and simple. Through colour choice, you match it to the features of your home or have it visually hidden away. Our Premium Style cover offers a hardwood timber top inlaid into an aluminium frame with hand finished, detailed edges and an oiled surface to elevate it to sit alongside the finest outdoor furniture and building features. Your home is unique – it is for that reason we offer the full powder coat range of colours from Dulux, Interpon and more. These ranges include all aluminium window joinery colours as well as the popular Colorsteel range and many more. If your colour choice is from a different range or brand, we are happy to guide you in the colour matching process, either choosing the closest match based on your information, or providing you with information on how to colour match yourself. Obtaining the Perfect Result To ensure the perfect fit, we ask for your heat pump model number and installed dimensions of your heat pump. Where possible, a photo of the heat pump in place is the easiest way to ensure accuracy. If your heat pump is not installed yet, we just need the model number and we can provide information for your installer to ensure they install the heat pump in the best location for covering. Standard Sizings Our standard sizes are compatible with the majority of leading heat pump brands. All sizes are in mm. Small Cover 1030w x 420d x 600–750h externally. Suitable for heat pump units with maximum dimensions of 900w x 330d x 710h. Large Cover 1080w x 470d x 1000h externally. Suitable for heat pump units with maximum dimensions of 950w x 360d x 980h. Extra Large Cover 1180w x 490d x 1450h externally. Suitable for heat pump units with maximum dimensions of 1050w x 380d x 1430h. Mounting Options Our go-to bracket provides for an anchor point at each corner down to the ground. This is clean and simple and easy to access for service. Not all ground surfaces can be affixed to – waterproof membranes and suspended tile decks create situations where it may be best to go for our wall tie option. These keep the cover the correct distance from the wall and of course, nice and straight. Our third option is for wall hanging brackets. These are used when the heat pump is wall mounted and the cover is completely off the ground. They provide a firm hold and correct spacing back to the wall while the keyhole shaped interlock makes for easy lift-off access. These are an elected option and are an additional cost. We also custom fabricate brackets for unique situations. Assembly and Installation Our covers arrive flat packed and can be assembled in just a few minutes using a clever slide-together system. Instructions are included and this can be done in just a few minutes. The included installation diagrams ensure that your cover is working with your heat pump as it should. Tools required are a square drive screwdriver for assembly and a drill and driver for the anchor fixings which can vary depending on the material you are fastening to. We also take on custom builds for multiple units, large feature screens and provide supporting frames for double stacked heat pumps. Our system and knowledge gives us the ability to provide all sorts of solutions. We are open to consultation on any project you have in mind. Custom Builds We also take on custom builds for multiple covers, large feature screens and provide supporting frames for double stacked heat pumps. Our system and knowledge gives us the ability to provide all sorts of solutions. We are open to consultation on any project you have in mind. Ordering and Requests Order forms are available on request – please email us. Once we have your details we can get your order through our factory and have it shipped out ready to make the exterior of your home look fantastic, all to the specifications you choose. Further resources available on request are: • Measurement guide • Colour charts • Assembly and installation instructions • Photos and details of many of our projects Contact Heatpump Covers Limited www.heatpumpcovers.co.nz info@heatpumpcovers.co.nz We welcome your phone call on 0800 427 658 Printed August 2019 Page 1 of 5 Indoor Standard Features:  Rear Snow Guard SG‐1‐RE Side Snow Guard SG‐1‐SD Specifications are subject to change without notice. Description: (Optional Accessories) Front Windscreen Grille w/ i‐see Sensor    (Required Sold Separately) Model No. CM‐S‐FR‐NKMU     (x2 required) PAC‐SH650F‐E PLP‐41EAEU www.MitsubishiElectric.ca Note: 1. Mitsubishi Electric Sales Canada Inc. (MESCA) supports the use of only MESCA supplied and approved components and accessories for proper functioning of  the unit(s). Use of non ‐ MESCA supported components and accessories will affect warranty coverage. MESCA recommends (A) consideration of all applicable  design and application parameters and requirements specific to any project. 2. Should any person change this document in any manner whatsoever without MESCA’s written permission, the document shall be of no force and effect and  any change shall be deemed to be a representation and warranty made by that person and not MESCA. That person, and not MESCA, shall assume full  responsibility for the consequences of such changes. MESCA assumes no responsibility for any consequences in such cases. CM‐S‐BLK‐NKMU   (x2 per box) Flange for fresh air intake Cold climate heat pump Built‐in condensate lift mechanism Filter change indicator signal Washable filter Front Windscreen Blocker Purchaser: Outdoor Standard Features: Description: Built in base pan heater Automatically restarts after power failure return Energy efficient operation with variable speed DC motor Automated control to prevent premature failure of condenser coil Fast Auto restart Inverter Motor Auxiliary heat lock out Automated compressor cutout Prevents premature activation of aux. heat Prevents inefficient operation & protects compressor © 2021 Mitsubishi Electric Sales Canada Inc.Form No. SB_PLA‐A42EA7 & PUZ‐HA42NKA1_202110                         Submittal Data: PLA‐A42EA7 & PUZ‐HA42NKA1                     42,000 BTU/H Ceiling‐Cassette Cold Climate Heat Pump System Images provided for reference purposes only Auto mode Prolong condenser operating life Automatically switches between heating & cooling modes Blue Fin Coating Job Name:Location: Submitted By: Submitted To: Engineer: Reference:                  Approval:                     Construction: Date:Application: Optional Controller Btu/h Btu/h W W pints/h Btu/h Btu/h W W Btu/h Btu/h Btu/h W W W Btu/h W Btu/h W V AC V DC kA A AWG °F (°C) °F (°C) °F (°C) °F (°C) Page 2 of 5 COP at 5°F4 Electrical: Power Supply  3.34 2.20 1.91 208/230V, 1Ph, 60Hz Rated Capacity Maximum CapacityCOP at 17°F3 Recommended Wire Size (Indoor ‐ Outdoor) Outdoor Operating Temperature Range: DC 24V 5 40 14 Recommended Fuse/Breaker Size (Outdoor) HSPF (IV)                                                                                          16.3 10.7 9.80 COP at 47°F2 38,400 7,496 Efficiency: SEER                                                                                       EER1                                                                                 Maximum Capacity Maximum Power InputHeating at ‐13°F5 Maximum CapacityHeating at 5°F4 Maximum Power Input Rated Capacity Capacity Range Rated Power Input Power Input Range Heating at 17°F3 Maximum Power Input Capacity Range Rated Power Input Power Input Range Maximum Capacity Rated Capacity www.MitsubishiElectric.ca Specifications are subject to change without notice. © 2021 Mitsubishi Electric Sales Canada Inc. Cooling at 95°F1 Rated Capacity 42,000 Capacity Range Rated Power Input Power Input Range Moisture Removal 18,800 ‐ 42,000 3,920 1,470 ‐ 3,920 4.5 0.88 48,000 48,000 40,500                 Submittal Data: PLA‐A42EA7 & PUZ‐HA42NKA1 Performance: Sensible Heat Factor  Heating at 47°F2 48,000 17,000 ‐ 54,000 4,210 1,240 ‐ 5,050 7,338 NA ‐ 48,000 5,385 NA ‐ 6,385 6,385 Form No. SB_PLA‐A42EA7 & PUZ‐HA42NKA1_202110 Notes: Maximum Capacity Cooling Operation Air Temp (Maximum / Minimum)* Heating Operation Thermal Lock‐out / Re‐start Temperatures Heating Operation Air Temp (Maximum / Minimum) * 0 to 115 (‐18 to 46) ‐22 / ‐13 (‐30 / ‐25) AHRI Rated Conditions (Rated data is determined at a fixed compressor speed) (* Windscreens required for cooling operations below 23°F (‐5°C)) 1Cooling (Indoor // Outdoor) 80°F (26.6°C) DB, 67°F (19.4°C) WB // 95°F (35°C) DB, 75°F (23.9°C) WB 2Heating at 47°F (8.3°C) (Indoor // Outdoor) 70°F (21.1°C) DB, 60°F (15.6°C) WB // 47°F (8.3°C) DB, 43°F (6.1°C) WB 3Heating at 17°F (‐8.3°C) (Indoor // Outdoor) 70°F (21.1°C) DB, 60°F (15.6°C) WB // 17°F (‐8.3°C) DB, 15°F (‐9.4°C) WB Rated conditions: 4Heating at 5°F (‐15°C) (Indoor // Outdoor) 70°F (21.1°C) DB, 60°F (15.6°C) WB // 5°F (‐15°C) DB, 4°F (‐15.6°C) WB 5Heating at ‐13°F (25°C) (Indoor // Outdoor) 70°F (21.1°C) DB, 60°F (15.6°C) WB // ‐13°F (‐25°C) DB, ‐15°F (‐26.1°C) WB Cooling Operation Thermal Lock‐out / Re‐start Temperatures  ‐1 / 3 (‐18 / ‐16)  ‐13 to 75 (‐25 to 24) AC 208/230VVoltage: Indoor ‐ Outdoor, S1‐S2 Voltage: Indoor ‐ Outdoor, S2‐S3 Short‐circuit Current Rating (SCCR) Page 3 of 5 37‐13/32 (950)Dimensions Main Unit Panel 33‐1/16 (840) 33‐1/16 (840)37‐13/32 (950) 11‐3/4 (298)1‐9/16 (40) Unit Weight Lbs. (kg)56 (25)11 (5) Sound Pressure Level, Heating2 Refrigerant Control External Finish Color 5/8 (15.88) 3/8 (9.52) oz. LEV 51 W: In. (mm)41‐11/32 (1,050) D: In. (mm)12‐63/64 + 63/64 (330 +25) Outdoor Unit Specifications: MCA MOCP H: In. (mm) 52‐43/64 (1,338) Unit Weight A W Compressor Oil Type / Charge Building automated system DDC Interface PAC‐SJ95MA‐E       MELCO‐RETAIL‐MINI Building automated system BacNet Interface MELCO‐BEMS‐MINI PAR‐CT01MAU‐SB Wireless wall mounted remote control MHK1 PAR‐SR4LU‐E RMF‐CA100‐V1 Description: (Optional Controls)Model No. PAM‐4 Wireless remote receiver PAR‐SL100A‐E Wired wall mounted remote control  PAR‐40MAA Touch screen wired wall mounted control 245 (75) 100 (30) Gas Pipe Size O.D. (Flared) www.MitsubishiElectric.ca Specifications are subject to change without notice. Deluxe thermostat interface MNet adapter (BacNet/LonWorks BAS sub interface) Form No. SB_PLA‐A42EA7 & PUZ‐HA42NKA1_202110 Ivory Munsell No.3Y 7.8/1.1 Liquid Pipe Size O.D. (Flared) Maximum Piping Length Maximum Height Difference In. (mm) In. (mm) Ft. (m) Ft. (m) A Airflow Rate  (Cooling/Heating)CFM 3,319/ 3,319 Fan Motor Output Sound Pressure Level, Cooling1 © 2021 Mitsubishi Electric Sales Canada Inc. Wireless MA Remote Controller PAR‐FL32MA‐E Remote Operation Adapter PAC‐SF40RM‐E Operation/error display adapter  PAC‐SA88HA‐EP Auxiliary Heat (CN24) Cable PAC‐SE56RA‐E Remote ON/OFF control  PAC‐SE55RA‐E Remote Compressor ON/OFF control PAC‐SC36NA‐E Remote Controller Infrared Receiver Basic wired wall mounted control PAC‐YT53CRAU‐J Heater control relay  FVC68D / 57 oz Lbs. (kg)283 (128) Unit Dimensions dB(A) Drain Pipe Size dB(A) In. (mm) 34 ‐ 38 ‐ 42 ‐ 45 34 ‐ 38 ‐ 42 ‐ 45 1‐1/4 (32) Munsell 1.0Y 9.2/0.2 dB(A) External Finish Color  [Panel] W: In. (mm) D: In. (mm) H: In. (mm) Sound Pressure Level (Cooling) Sound Pressure Level (Heating) dB(A) 36 44 74 + 74 49                 Submittal Data: PLA‐A42EA7 & PUZ‐HA42NKA1 Indoor Unit Specifications: CFM CFM 2.00 1.05 120 740 ‐ 920 ‐ 1,060 ‐ 1,200 A A W CFM MCA Blower Motor Full Load Amperage Blower Motor Output Airflow Rate at Cooling, Dry 700 ‐ 880 ‐ 1,020 ‐ 1,160 740 ‐ 920 ‐ 1,060 ‐ 1,200 Airflow Rate at Cooling, Wet Airflow Rate at Heating, Dry Page 4 of 5                 Submittal Data: PLA‐A42EA7 & PUZ‐HA42NKA1 Indoor Unit Outline and Dimensions: www.MitsubishiElectric.ca Specifications are subject to change without notice. © 2021 Mitsubishi Electric Sales Canada Inc.Form No. SB_PLA‐A42EA7 & PUZ‐HA42NKA1_202110Unit: inch (mm) Page 5 of 5                 Submittal Data: PLA‐A42EA7 & PUZ‐HA42NKA1 Outdoor Unit Outline and Dimensions: www.MitsubishiElectric.ca Specifications are subject to change without notice. © 2021 Mitsubishi Electric Sales Canada Inc.Form No. SB_PLA‐A42EA7 & PUZ‐HA42NKA1_202110*1*1*1Unit: mm<in>                                   SunPower Maxeon Solar Cell Technology Fundamentally Different. And Better.  Cell efficiencies of over 25%  Delivers leading reliability3  Patented solid metal foundation prevents breakage and corrosion As sustainable as the energy it produces.  Achieved the #1 ranking on the Silicon Valley Toxics Coalition’s Solar Scorecard for 3 years running  SunPower modules can contribute to your business’s LEED certification4 A       SunPower®Maxeon®Technology SunPower® Maxeon® cell-based panels maximize energy production and savings by combining industry-leading power, efficiency, and durability with the most comprehensive power, product, and service warranty in the industry.1,2   Highest Power Density Available SunPower’s new Maxeon Gen 5 cell is 65% larger than prior generations, delivering the most powerful cell and highest efficiency panel in residential solar.2 The result is more power per square meter than any commercially available solar.1 Maximum Lifetime Energy and Savings Designed to deliver up to 54% more energy from the same space over the first 25 years in real-world conditions like partial shade and high temperatures.1 25-year EnergyYears of Operation Up to 54% More Lifetime Energy 0 5 10 15 20 25 150% 140% 130% 120% 110% 100% 90% 80% 70% 60% Conventional Panel SunPower A-Series Panels Best Reliability, Best Warranty SunPower technology is proven to last and we stand behind our panels with the industry’s most comprehensive 25-year Combined Power, Product and Service Warranty. sunpower.com  390–400 W Residential A-Series Panels    Operating Condition And Mechanical Data Temperature −40° F to +185° F (−40° C to +85° C) Impact Resistance 1 inch (25 mm) diameter hail at 52 mph (23 m/s) Appearance Class A+ Solar Cells 66 Monocrystalline Maxeon Gen 5 Tempered Glass High-transmission tempered anti-reflective Junction Box IP-68, TE (PV4S) Weight 44 lbs (20 kg) Max. Test Load6 Wind: 125 psf, 6000 Pa, 611 kg/m² back Snow: 187 psf, 9000 Pa, 917 kg/m² front Design Load Wind: 75 psf, 3600 Pa, 367 kg/m² back Snow: 125 psf, 6000 Pa, 611 kg/m² front Frame Class 1 black anodized (highest AAMA rating) (A) Cable Length: 52 in +/-0.4 in [1320 mm +/-10 mm] (B) Long Side: 1.3 in [32 mm] Short Side: 0.9 in [24 mm] [40 mm] 1.57 in [1835 mm] 72.2 in [1016 mm] 40.0 in FRAME PROFILE (A) 40 mm [1.57 in]B                                                                                      Electrical Data SPR-A400-BLK SPR-A390-BLK Nominal Power (Pnom)5 400 W 390 W Power Tolerance +5/−0% +5/−0% Panel Efficiency 21.4% 20.9% Rated Voltage (Vmpp) 39.5 V 39.0 V Rated Current (Impp) 10.1 A 9.99 A Open-Circuit Voltage (Voc) 48.1 V 48.0 V Short-Circuit Current (Isc) 10.9 A 10.8 A Max. System Voltage 1000 V UL Maximum Series Fuse 20 A Power Temp Coef. −0.29% / o C Voltage Temp Coef. −136 mV / o C Current Temp Coef. 4.1 mA / o C Tests And Certifications Standard Tests UL1703 (Type 2 fire rated) Quality Management Certs ISO 9001:2015, ISO 14001:2015 EHS Compliance RoHS, OHSAS 18001:2007, lead free, Recycle Scheme, REACH SVHC-163 Available Listings UL 1 SunPower 400 W, 21.4% efficient, compared to a Conventional Panel on same-sized arrays (280 W p-multi, 17% efficient, approx. 1.64 m²), 8% more energy per watt (based on PVSyst pan files for avg US climate), 0.5%/yr slower degradation rate (Jordan, et. al. “Robust PV Degradation Methodology and Application.” PVSC 2018). 2 Based on search of datasheet values from websites of top 20 manufacturers per IHS, as of December 2019. 3 Jordan, et. al. Robust PV Degradation Methodology and Application. PVSC 2018. 4 Maxeon panels can contribute to LEED Materials and Resources credit categories. 5 Standard Test Conditions (1000 W/m² irradiance, AM 1.5, 25° C). NREL calibration Standard: SOMS current, LACCS FF and Voltage. 6 Please read the safety and installation guide for more information regarding load ratings and mounting configurations. See www.sunpower.com/company for more reference information. For more details, see extended datasheet: www.sunpower.com/solar-resources. Specifications included in this datasheet are subject to change without notice. ©2021 SunPower Corporation. All rights reserved. SUNPOWER, the SUNPOWER logo, and MAXEON are registered trademarks of SunPower Corporation in the U.S. and other countries as well. 390–400 W Residential A-Series Panels sunpower.com  538614 Rev A / LTR_US Publication Date: February 2021  1-800-SUNPOWER Module Fire Performance: Type 2 1000 V max. system voltage E331841 E331841   TESLA.COM/ENERGY POWERWALL Tesla Powerwall is a fully-integrated AC battery system for residential or light commercial use. Its rechargeable lithium-ion battery pack provides energy storage for solar self-consumption, time-based control, and backup. Powerwall’s electrical interface provides a simple connection to any home or building. Its revolutionary compact design achieves market-leading energy density and is easy to install, enabling owners to quickly realize the benefits of reliable, clean power. PERFORMANCE SPECIFICATIONS AC Voltage (Nominal)120/240 V Feed-In Type Split Phase Grid Frequency 60 Hz Total Energy 14 kWh Usable Energy 13.5 kWh Real Power, max continuous 5 kW (charge and discharge) Real Power, peak (10s, off-grid/backup)7 kW (charge and discharge) Apparent Power, max continuous 5.8 kVA (charge and discharge) Apparent Power, peak (10s, off-grid/backup)7.2 kVA (charge and discharge) Maximum Supply Fault Current 10 kA Maximum Output Fault Current 32 A Overcurrent Protection Device 30 A Imbalance for Split-Phase Loads 100% Power Factor Output Range +/– 1.0 adjustable Power Factor Range (full-rated power)+/– 0.85 Internal Battery DC Voltage 50 V Round Trip Efficiency1,3 90% Warranty 10 years ENVIRONMENTAL SPECIFICATIONS Operating Temperature –20°C to 50°C (–4°F to 122°F) Recommended Temperature 0°C to 30°C (32°F to 86°F) Operating Humidity (RH)Up to 100%, condensing Storage Conditions –20°C to 30°C (–4°F to 86°F) Up to 95% RH, non-condensing State of Energy (SoE): 25% initial Maximum Elevation 3000 m (9843 ft) Environment Indoor and outdoor rated Enclosure Type NEMA 3R Ingress Rating IP67 (Battery & Power Electronics) IP56 (Wiring Compartment) Wet Location Rating Yes Noise Level @ 1m < 40 dBA at 30°C (86°F) MECHANICAL SPECIFICATIONS Dimensions1 1150 mm x 755 mm x 147 mm (45.3 in x 29.6 in x 5.75 in) Weight1 114 kg (251.3 lbs) Mounting options Floor or wall mount 1 Dimensions and weight differ slightly if manufactured before March 2019. 1 Values provided for 25°C (77°F), 3.3 kW charge/discharge power. 2 In Backup mode, grid charge power is limited to 3.3 kW. 3 AC to battery to AC, at beginning of life. COMPLIANCE INFORMATION Certifications UL 1642, UL 1741, UL 1973, UL 9540, IEEE 1547, UN 38.3 Grid Connection Worldwide Compatibility Emissions FCC Part 15 Class B, ICES 003 Environmental RoHS Directive 2011/65/EU Seismic AC156, IEEE 693-2005 (high) 2 4 6 5 3 8 1 7 753 mm (29.6 in) 147 mm (5.75 in) 1150 mm (45.3 in) Contact Tesla for additional information. TESLA.COM/ENERGY TYPICAL SYSTEM LAYOUTS PARTIAL HOME BACKUP WHOLE HOME BACKUP Main panelSub panel Solar Home loads Solar inverter Utility meter GridBackup Gateway Powerwall Backup loads Optional NA - BACKUP - 2019-06-11 Utility meter GridBackup Gateway including service disconnect Main panel Solar Whole home backup Solar inverter Powerwall Optional ENERGY STAR CERTIFIED Electric Vehicle Chargers ChargePoint - CPH50 : CPH50 Specifications Brand Name:ChargePoint Model Name:CPH50 Model Number:CPH50 ENERGY STAR Unique ID:2341067 ENERGY STAR Partner:ChargePoint, Inc. Product Type:Level 2 Input Voltage (V):240 Max Nameplate Output Current (A):50 Maximum Output Power (kW):12.0 Number of Outputs:1 Maximum Output Cord Length (ft.):23 Output Cord Gauge (AWG):9 Network Protocol with Wake Capability:Wi-Fi or Gigabit Ethernet Automatic Brightness Control (ABC) Capable?: No 15 A Operation Mode Test: Total Loss (watts): 16.42 30 A Operation Mode Test: Total Loss (watts): 57.16 4 A Operation Mode Test: Total Loss (watts): 4.23 Full Current Operation Mode Test: Total Loss (watts): 158.11 Idle Mode Input Power (watts):3.53 Idle Mode Power Factor:0.4 Idle Mode Total Allowance (watts):23.6 No Vehicle Mode Input Power (watts):0.8 No Vehicle Mode Power Factor:0.22 No Vehicle Mode Total Allowance (watts):3.6 Partial On Mode Input Power (watts):1.36 Partial On Mode Power Factor:0.29 Partial On Mode Total Allowance (watts):3.6 Date Certified:2019-06-25 Date Available on Market:2019-06-25 Markets:United States, Canada ENERGY STAR Certified:Yes Additional Model Information Fleet,CPF50,; Fleet,CPF50-L18,; Fleet,CPF50-L18- PEDMNT-Dual,; Fleet,CPF50-L18-CMK6-PEDMNT-Dual,; Fleet,CPF50-L18-PEDMNT,; Fleet,CPF50-L18-PEDMNT-CMK6,; Fleet,CPF50-L18-WALLMNT-CMK6,; Fleet,CPF50- L23,; Fleet,CPF50-L23-CMK6-PEDMNT-Dual,; Fleet,CPF50-L23-PEDMNT,; Fleet,CPF50-L23-PEDMNT-CMK6,; Fleet,CPF50-L23-PEDMNT-Dual,; Fleet,CPF50-L23-WALLMNT-CMK6,; Home Flex,CPH50-NEMA14-50-L23,; Home F lex,CPH50-NEMA6-50-L23, UPC Codes Captured On: 01/16/2023 ChargePoint Home Flex Specifications and Ordering Information Ordering Information Description Model Number Station and Cable Model 16A-50A, NEMA 6-50 plug, 7010.4 mm (23') Charging Cable 16A-50A, NEMA 14-50 plug, 7010.4 mm (23') Charging Cable CPH50-NEMA6-50-L23 CPH50-NEMA14-50-L23 Replacement Cable 7010.4 mm (23') Charging Cable CPH50Cable-T1-50A-L23-F ChargePoint® Home Flex 2 chargepoint.com ChargePoint Home Flex 284.3 mm (11.19") 179.4 mm (7.06") Weight: 6.26kg (13.8lbs) 132.1 mm (5.20") 179.6 mm (7.07") Dimensions chargepoint.com 3 Specifications Connector and Electrical Input Cord NEMA 6-50 or NEMA 14-50 AC Power Output Rating Maximum 12 kW (240V AC * 50A). Output amperage adjustable via mobile app to 16A, 24A, 32A, 40A, 48A, 50A. AC Power Input Rating 208/240V AC 60Hz single phase @ 16A, 24A, 32A, 40A, 48A, 50A Required Service Panel Breaker Dedicated Dual Pole rated for 125% of maximum load (ex: 50A breaker for 40A output) Service Panel GFCI External GFCI may conflict with internal GFCI (CCID). For hardwired installations, use a non-GFCI circuit breaker. Power Wiring 3 Wire – L1, L2 plus Earth (no neutral) Charging Cable Length 7010.4 mm (23') Connector Type SAE J1772™ Power Measurement Accuracy +/- 2.0% from 2% to full scale Power Report/Store Interval 15 minute aligned to hour Safety and Connectivity Features Ground Fault Detection 20 mA CCID with auto retry Open Safety Ground Detection Continuously monitors presence of safety (green wire) ground connection Plug-Out Detection Power terminated per SAE J1772 specifications Local Area Network 2.4/5 GHz Wi-Fi (802.11 a/b/g/n) Device storage Local data storage with capacity of up to 90 days of charging session data (100 sessions) in case of interrupted network connection Software Updates Firmware updated over-the-air (OTA) Safety and Operational Ratings Enclosure Ratings Type 3R per UL 50E Safety and Compliance UL and cUL listed product per UL2594, UL2231-1, UL2231-2. NEC Article 625 compliant For Canada CSA C22.2, No. 280, 281.1, 281.2, CEC EMI Compliance FCC Part 15 Class B Storage Temperature -40°C to 60°C (-40°F to 140°F) ambient Operating Temperature -30°C to 50°C (-22°F to 122°F) ambient Operating Humidity Up to 95% at 50°C (122°F) non-condensing Non-Operating Humidity Up to 95% at 50°C (122°F) non-condensing ENERGY STAR® Certification Yes Indicators WiFi LED Yes Fault Indicator per UL Yes Status LED Yes ChargePoint Home Flex ChargePoint, Inc. 240 East Hacienda Avenue Campbell, CA 95008-6617 USA +1.408.841.4500 or +1.877.370.3802 US and Canada toll-free chargepoint.com Listed by Underwriters Laboratories Inc. Copyright © 2019 ChargePoint, Inc. All rights reserved. CHARGEPOINT is a U.S. registered trademark/service mark, and an EU registered logo mark of ChargePoint, Inc. All other products or services mentioned are the trademarks, service marks, registered trademarks or registered service marks of their respective owners. DS-HomeFlex-00. September 2019. PN 73-001318-01-1. Contact Us Visit chargepoint.com Call +1.408.705.1992 Email sales@chargepoint.com Installation Install Software Mobile App (iOS & Android) Outdoor Installation Hardwired installation or weatherproof NEMA receptacle Note: Required by code to install an outdoor rated GFCI breaker upstream for outdoor plug-in installation ChargePoint, Inc. reserves the right to alter product offerings and specifications at any time without notice, and is not responsible for typographical or graphical errors that may appear in this document. 31/4” 3 65/8” 2 41/4” 3 71/2” 2 4” 71/4” 8” / 10” / 12” / 14” / 16” / 18” / 20” ACCESSORIES Optional 1. Heavy Metal and RDX only 2. Heavy Metal and RDX glasses are 71/2” in height 3. Heavy Metal and RDX glasses are 4” in diameter 1. Heavy Metal and RDX only 2. Heavy Metal and RDX cast guards are 8” in height 3. Heavy Metal and RDX cast guards are 51/2” in diameter WIRE CAGE WITH GLASS ENCLOSURE • Wire cage can be specified in all standard and specialized finishes, and will match shade finish unless otherwise specified (Note: For galvanized shade finishes, wire cage is finished in Painted Natural Aluminum) • Glass is available in clear (-CGWC) or frosted (-FGWC) • See fixture pages for availability -CGWC -FGWC (Clear Glass w/ Wire Cage) (Frosted Glass w/ Wire Cage) WIRE GUARD • Wire guard can be specified in all standard and specialized finishes, and will match shade finish unless otherwise specified (Note: For galvanized shade finishes, wire guard is finished in Painted Natural Aluminum) • See fixture pages for availability -WG (Wire Guard) GLASS ENCLOSURE • Glass is available in clear (-CG), frosted (-FG) or opal (-OG) 1 • See fixture pages for availability -CG -FG -OG (Clear Glass Enclosure) (Frosted Glass Enclosure) (Opal Glass Enclosure) 1 CAST GUARD WITH GLASS ENCLOSURE • Cast guard can be specified in all standard and specialized finishes, and will match shade finish unless otherwise specified (Note: For galvanized shade finishes, cast guard is unfinished Raw Aluminum) • Glass is available in clear (-CGG), frosted (-FGG) or opal (-OGG) 1 • See fixture pages for availability -CGG -FGG -OGG (Clear Glass w/ Cast Guard) (Frosted Glass w/ Cast Guard) (Opal Glass w/ Cast Guard) 1 Troy-CSL Lighting reserves the right to change the technical specifications of its products at any time without notice. www.troyrlm.com 5958 Type: BEGA Product: Project: Voltage: Color: Options: Modified: BEGA 1000 BEGA Way, Carpinteria, CA 93013 (805) 684-0533 FAX (805 ) 566 -9474 www .bega -us .com ©copyright BEGA 2017 Updated 02/17 Housing: One-piece die-cast housing. Die castings are marine grade and copper free (≤0.3% copper content) A360.0 aluminum alloy. Enclosure: Matte safety glass lens. Fully gasketed using a one piece molded silicone gasket. Electrical: 2.1W LED luminaire, 3.4W total system watts, -30°C start temperature. Integral 12V AC driver provided must be operated using remote magnetic transformer. Standard LED color temperature is 3000K with a >90 CRI. Note: LEDs supplied with luminaire. Due to the dynamic nature of LED technology, LED luminaire data on this sheet is subject to change at the discretion of BEGA-US. For the most current technical data, please refer to www.bega-us.com. Anchor base: Bollard base made of aluminum, made for bolting attachment to galvanized steel direct burial anchorage. Bollards are secured to anchorage using stainless steel set screws. Finish: Available in four standard BEGA colors: Black (BLK); Bronze (BRZ). To specify, add appropriate suffix to catalog number. Please note: BEGA’s approach to product design is to innovate, not follow. With a steadfast commitment to quality, each product is conceived to satisfy a general or specific lighting task as defined by its architectural or exterior surroundings. The Home and Garden Collection is designed specifically for use in Residential and Light Commercial applications. Please reference our standard BEGA portfolio when mounting provisions for the rigorous demands of high-use commercial and/or vandal prone settings are required. CSA certified to U.S. and Canadian standards, suitable for wet locations. Protection class IP65 Weight: 4.4 lbs Lamp A B C 77 276 with direct burial anchorage 2.1W LED 2 3⁄4 9 7⁄8 3 1⁄2 LED garden and pathway bollard A A B C C PRODUCT FINISH WATTAGE LIGHT SOURCE WIRING MOUNTING ACCESSORIES (INCLUDED) OPTIONS & ACCESSORIES 15802 Dimensions: 8" W x 26.4" L with 1.25" Square Stem Cast Aluminum TZT - Textured Tannery Bronze™ 4 W / 5.8 VA Note: Not for use with electronic transformers. Integrated LEDs and Driver 2950K (-150 / +175) High CRI 30" of usable #18-2, SPT- 1-W leads. Cable connector supplied. 8" In-ground stake 15601AZT - Cast Aluminum Surface Mounting Flange w/ Bronze Finish, Neoprene Gasket For Watertight Seal 15601BKT - Cast Aluminum Surface Mounting Flange w/ Black Finish, Neoprene Gasket For Watertight Seal 15601BBR - Cast Brass Surface Mounting Flange, Neoprene Gasket For Watertight Seal Flange For Tree / Surface Mounting 15607AZT - Textured Bronze Finish 15607BKT - Textured Black Finish 15607BBR - Bronzed Brass Finish FEATURESLED Pyramid • A style to fit a wide variety of tastes, the subtle look of this design will find a home in a wide variety of landscapes. • Cast Aluminum Housing • 4 W / 5.8 VA Light Output, Integrated LEDs and Driver, 2950K (-150/+175), High CRI • 9V - 15V AC/DC • 30" of useable #18-2, SPT-1W leads. Cable connector supplied. • 8" In-ground stake EXAMPLE: 15802TZT (Product # & Finish) We reserve the right to revise the design or components of any product due to parts availability or change in UL standards, without assuming any obligation or liability to modify any products previously manufactured, and without notice. NOTES ORDERING INFORMATION PROjECT: TyPE: ORDERING # : COMMENTS: 8" 26.4" 15802TZT 1.25" Square Stem Fixture Photometric (fc) Distance from Light 0' 1' 2' 3' 4' 5' 6' 7' 8' Footcandles 8.01 5.4 2.23 .85 .37 .19 0.09 – – 7711 E. Pleasant Valley Road, Cleveland, OH 44131 ph:(216) 573-1000 fax:(216) 573-2270 email:sales@kichler.com web:landscapelighting.com For Warranty Information, please visit www.landscapelighting.com