Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
Land Use Case.213 S Galena St.HPC002-00
--- 2737-182-24-009 HPC002-00 j 1 Andres Building Minor HPC 312 S. Galena St. E-3X l# P- S j P 4 CASE NUMBER HPC002-00 PARCEL ID # 2737-182-24009 CASE NAME Andre's Building PROJECT ADDRESS 312 S. Galena PLANNER Amy Guthrie CASE TYPE Minor HPC OWNER/APPLICANT Aspen Downtown LLC. REPRESENTATIVE Mark Haldeman DATE OF FINAL ACTION 8/22/01 CITY COUNCIL ACTION PZ ACTION HPC Reso. 38-2001 ADMIN ACTION Approved BOA ACTION DATE CLOSED 6/17/02 BY J. Lindt PARCEL ID:|2737-182-24009 DATE RCVD: ~ 1/12/00 # COPIES:~ CASE NO|HPC002-OO CASE NAME-IAndre's Building ' PLNR~t a,bul es (,4 4:lt PROJ ADDR:]312 S. Galena CASE TYP ~1Oii* HPC STEPS ~ OWN/APP: Aspen Downtown LL ADR~312 S. Galena C/S/Z 1 PHN:]925-2865 REP:|Mark Haldeman ADR.]1377 Snowbunny Ln. C/S/Z ~ PHN1379-3372 FEES DUE ~480 D FEES RCVD ~480 STAT: F- REFERRALS< REF:~ BY~ DUEd ·yx MTG DATE REV BODY PH NOTICED 9~ f ·.. ' fl - DATE OF FINAL AC~Mf#**0/ __ REMARKS| CITY COUNCIL: pz: Npr/ Re 336 -NE- 2£36 CLOSED: 14 '1(zBY: 11, L.-;Uj ' BOA: DRAC: - PLAT SUBMITd: ~ ' PLAT (BK,PG):~ ADMIN:A#90*1 .. RESOLUTION OF THE ASPEN HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION APPROVING AN APPLICATION FOR MINOR DEVELOPMENT LOCATED AT 312 S. GALENA STREET, LOTS A-D, BLOCK 95, CITY AND TOWNSITE OF ASPEN, COLORADO PARCEL ID: 2737-182-24-009 RESOLUTION NO. 38, SERIES OF 2001 WHEREAS, the applicants, Prada, represented by Hansen Construction, have requested minor development approval for the property located at 312 S. Galena Street, Lots A-D, Block 95, City and Townsite of Aspen. The property is listed on the "Inventory of Historic Sites and Structures," and WHEREAS, all development in an "H," Historic Overlay District or development involving a historic landmark must meet all four Development Review Standards of Section 26.72.010(D) of the Aspen Land Use Code in order for HPC to grant approval, namely: 1. Standard: The proposed development is compatible in general design, massing and volume, scale and site plan with designated historic structures located on the parcel and with development on adjacent parcels when the subject site is in a "H," Historic Overlay District or is adjacent to an Historic Landmark. 2. Standard: The proposed development reflects and is consistent with the character of the neighborhood of the parcel proposed for development. 3. Standard: The proposed development enhances or does not detract from the historic significance o f designated historic structures located on the parcel proposed for development or on adjacent parcels. 4. Standard: The proposed development enhances or does not diminish from the architectural character or integrity of a designated historic structure or part thereof; and WHEREAS, James Lindt, in his staff report dated August 22, 2001, performed an analysis of the application based on the standards, and recommended denial of the project; and WHEREAS, at their regular meeting on August 22, 2001, the Historic Preservation Commission considered the application, found the application to meet the standards, and approved the application with conditions by a vote of 5 to 1. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED: That minor development for 312 S. Galena St., Lots A-D, Block 95, City and Townsite of Aspen, be approved with the following conditions. 1. The temporarybarricade shall be removed by November 15, 2001. 2. The applicant shall provide the Community Development Staff with fastening details on the method of attaching the temporary barricade to the building and have the method be approved by staff prior to attaching the temporary barricade to any portion of the building. 3. Prada and Hansen Construction would like to assure the city that we would not use this barricade as a screen to make any unauthorized alterations to the historic Andre's building. 4. The applicant shall provide photographic documentation o f the before and after conditions o f the building so that no unauthorized work is done while the temporary faGade is in place. 5. The applicant shall provide the city free access to make whatever inspections are necessary. 6. The applicant shall make sure that the barricade is not used as a bulletin board or billboard. If any notices or advertisements are placed on the fagade, then they shall be removed immediately. Similarly, if any graffiti or vandalism to the barricade occurs, the applicant shall have it repaired immediately APPROVED BY THE COMMISSION at its regular meeting on the 22nd day of August, 2001. Approved as to Form: 21 1 1 David Hoefer, Assistan; City Attorney Approved as to content: HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION 6(MEFT .5,91£1£-2-, *15 CK#[p- ATTEST: Kathy Strickland, Chief Deputy Clerk MEMORANDUM TO: Aspen Historic Preservation Commission THRU: Julie Ann Woods, Community Development Director Joyce 0hlson, Deputy Planning DirectoUAe FROM: James Lindt, Planning Technician d ~- RE: 312 South Galena Street - Minor Review, Public Hearing DATE: August 22, 2001 SUMMARY: This property contains the historic Andre's Building that is currently undergoing an interior remodel. The site is landmark designated and located within the Main Street Historic District. The applicant requests HPC approval to attach a seventeen (17) foot tall temporary barricade on the front facade of the building while the interior construction is completed. The barricade would include a sign with approximately 10" lettering that would say "Prada". APPLICANT: Arcades Associates LTD, owner. LOCATION: 312 S. Galena St., Lots A-D, Block 95, City and Townsite ofAspen. ZONING: The property is zoned "CC, Commercial Core" and is a designated historic landmark. MINOR DEVELOPMENT No approval for any development in the "H," Historic Overlay District, or involving historic landmarks shall be granted unless the Historic Preservation Commission finds that all of the following standards (Section 26.415.010.B.4) are met: a. The proposed development is compatible in general design, scale, site plan, massing and volume with designated historic structures located on the parcel and with development on adjacent parcels when the subject site is in an "H," Historic Overlay District, or is adjacent to an historic landmark. For historic landmarks where proposed development would extend into front yard, side yard and rear yard setbacks, extend into the minimum distance between buildings on the lot, exceed the allowed floor area by up to five hundred (500) square feet, or exceed the allowed site coverage by up to five (5) percent, the 1 Historic Preservation Commission may grant necessary variances after making a finding that such variation is more compatible in character with the historic landmark and the neighborhood than would be development in accord with dimensional requirements. In no event shall variations pursuant to this Section exceed those variations allowed under Section 26.520.040(B)(2), for detached accessory dwelling units. Response: The proposed changes would not affect the design, scale, and massing of the building. However, the temporary facade would hide the architectural characteristics of the front facade for three months. Staff feels that there are other option such as papering the windows from the interior. b. The proposed development reflects and is consistent with the character of the neighborhood of the parcel proposed for development. Response: Staff does not feel that proposed temporary changes are compatible with the character of the neighborhood in which all the storefronts contain visible windows. Staff is concerned that the barricade will become a bulletin board for fliers and graffiti. The barricade also gives the perception of a decrepit, boarded up store that might be found in a larger metropolitan area. e. The proposed development enhances or does not detract from the historic significance of designated historic structures located on the parcel proposed for development or adjacent parcels. Response: The proposal would not affect the permanent significance of the building because it is only a temporary facade, but staff is concerned that it would temporarily be an eyesore in the Historic District and may set a precedence for other interior remodels in the downtown area. Staff also has concerns about whether the Historic Preservation Officer and HPC Project Monitor's will be able to determine if anything is being changed on the exterior with the building. d. The proposed development enhances or does not diminish or detract from the architectural character and integrity of a designated historic structure or part thereof. Response: Staff feels that the proposed barricade would detract from the architectural character of the historic structure while it is in place. Staff is also concerned with the fact that the applicant is proposing to attach the temporary facade to the face of the building with the possibility that the adhesive could damage the facade of the building. ALTERNATIVES: The HPC may consider any of the following alternatives: • Approve the application as submitted. 2 • Approve the application with conditions to be met prior to issuance of a building permit. • Table action to allow the applicant further time for restudy. (Specific recommendations should be offered.) • Deny approval finding that the application does not meet the Development Review Standards. RECOMMENDATION AND RECOMMENDED MOTION: Staff recommends that the HPC deny the request to construct and attach the temporary facade to the building as proposed. Exhibits: A. Resolution B. Application. 'Uj 11111111111111111.111111111111111111111111111111111 443356 05/16/2000 09:40A RESOLUTI DAVIS SILVI 1 of 3 R 15.00 D 0.00 N 0.00 PITKIN COUNTY CO RESOLUTIONOF THE ASPEN HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION APPROVING AN APPLICATION FOR MINOR DEVELOPMENT FOR 312 S. GALENA, CITY AND TOWNSITE OF ASPEN, COLORADO Parcel No. 2737-182-24-009 i RESOLUTION NO.~-, SERIES OF 2000 WHEREAS, the applicants, The Aspen Downtown LLC, represented by Mark Haldeman, have requested minor design approval for the property at 312 S. Galena Street, City and Townsite of Aspen. The project involves restoring the original storefront; and WHEREAS, all development in an "H," Historic Overlay District or development involving a historic landmark must meet all four Development Review Standards of Section 26.415.010.C.5 of the Aspen Land Use Code in order for HPC to grant approval, namely: 1. Standard: The proposed development is compatible in general design, massing and volume. scale and site plan with designated historic structures located on the parcel and with development on adjacent parcels when the subject site is in a "H," Historic Overlay District or is adjacent to an Historic Landmark. For Historic Landmarks where proposed development would extend into front yard, side yard and rear yard setbacks, extend into the minimum distance between buildings on the lot or exceed the allowed floor area by up to five hundred (500) square feet or the allowed site coverage by up to five (5) percent, HPC may grant such variances after making a finding that such variation is more compatible in character with the historic landmark and the neighborhood, than would be development in accord with dimensional requirements. In no event shall variations pursuant to this section exceed those variations allowed under the Cottage Infill Program for detached accessory dwelling units pursuant to Section 26.40.090(B)(2). 2. Standard: The proposed development reflects and is consistent with the character o f the neighborhood of the parcel proposed for development. 3. Standard: The proposed development en-hances or does not detract from the historic significance of designated historic structures located on the parcel proposed for development or on adjacent parcels. 4. Standard: The proposed development enhances or does not diminish from the architectural character or integrity of a designated historic structure or part thereof; and 111'111 lilli 111111.111 lili'111 lilli 111 lilli lili lili 443356 05/16/2000~ 09 : 40A RESOLUTI DAVIS SILVI 2 of 3 R 15.00 D 0.00 N 0.00 PITKIN COUNTY CO WHEREAS, Amy Guthrie, in her staff report dated February 23,2000, performed an analysis of the application based on the standards, found favorably for the application, and recommended approval with conditions; and WHEREAS, at their regular meeting on February 23, 2000, the Historic Preservation Commission considered the application, found the application to meet the standards, and approved the application with conditions by a vote of 7 to 0. THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED: That the review standards are met and HPC grants minor development approval for 312 S. Galena Street, City and Townsite of Aspen, as presented at the February 23,2000 meeting, as follows: 1. The location, condition, and possible restoration of the columns is to be confirmed and reviewed after demolition and discovery with staff and monitor. 2. The proposed new window on the south elevation to be reviewed by staff and monitor. 3. The storefront mullions must replicate the historic configuration, and staff and monitor will review the details. 4. Confirm the existence and the condition of any historic glass during demolition and discovery and review with staff and monitor. 5. The replication of the transom configuration above the entry door shall match the historic storefront per staffs memo. 6. The process for brick restoration shall be reviewed and approved by staff and monitor. 7. A spec for the replacement windows on the north elevation needs to be submitted. 8. More information about the elevator tower needs to be submitted as well as anything else on the rooftop. APPROVED BY THE COMMISSION at its regular meeting on the 23rd day of February, 2000. Approved as to Form: David Hoefer, Assistantkity Attorney 1111111 lilli 1111111'11.11111'11 lilli 111 lilli lill i 111 443356 05/16/2000 09:40A RESOLUTI DAVIS SILVI 3 of 3 R 15.00 0 0.00 N 0.00 PITKIN COUNTY CO Approved as to Content: HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION L.31 -1/43- p, SuMn~ Reid, Chair ~ ATTEST: 21« *ade Kathy Strickland, Chief Deputy Clerk 91 f 4 MEMORANDUM TO: Aspen Historic Preservation Commission THRU: Julie Ann Woods, Community Development Director Joyce 0hlson, Deputy Planning Directok~O FROM: Amy Guthrie, Historic Preservation Officer RE: 312 S. Galena Street- minor review DATE: February 23,2000 SUMMARY: The applicant requests HPC approval to restore the landmark building at 312 S. Galena Street, including recreating the original entry, removing brick in original window openings and removing the paint from the historic masonry. APPLICANT: The Aspen Downtown, LLC, represented by Mark Haldeman, partner. LOCATION: 312 S. Galena Street. the north 32 feet of Lots K and L, and the north 30 feet of Lot M, Block 95, City and Townsite of Aspen. MINOR DEVELOPMENT No approval for any development in the "H," Historic Overlay District, or involving historic landmarks shall be granted unless the Historic Preservation Commission finds that all of the following standards (Section 26.415.010.B.4) are met: a. The proposed development is compatible in general design, scale, site plan, massing and volume with designated historic structures located on the parcel and with development on adjacent parcels when the subject site is in an "H," Historic Overlay District, or is adjacent to an historic landmark. For historic landmarks where proposed development would extend into front yard, side yard and rear yard setbacks, extend into the minimum distance between buildings on the lot, exceed the allowed floor area by up to five hundred (500) square feet, or exceed the allowed site coverage by up to five (5) percent, the Historic Preservation Commission may grant necessary variances after making a finding that such variation is more compatible in character with the historic landmark and the neighborhood than would be development in accord with dimensional requirements. In no event shall variations pursuant to this Section exceed those variations allowed under Section 26.520.040(B)(2),for detached accessory dwelling units. 1 4»uuaA--A -4--- -: -{.1 Response: The HPC has examined drawings and photographs showing the original entry to this building, and later remodels. As viewed in the oldest photo, depicting the E. W. Jewett grocery store, the building featured the classic storefront of that era, divided into three bays, with a recessed entry in the middle. There were large display windows with transoms above them. The focus of the discussion at the January 26th HPC meeting was how to accomplish a restoration of the original storefront. The old photograph shows a large platform in front of the store that allowed entrance into the building with just two steps up from the sidewalk. Now that the elevation of the sidewalk has been lowered substantially, getting from the sidewalk to the first floor level, meeting all building codes, presents a challenge to restoring the building. The applicants, staff, and the HPC monitors met with the Engineering and Building Departments, and through the diligence of the applicants, who researched historic photos, an encroachment license will be issued by the City to allow the new steps to project slightly into the right of way. This allows the entry door to move within 5'6" of the front faGade. (Typically the entry door in this type of commercial building was recessed about 4'.) One of the Engineering Department's conditions in approving the encroachment is that the steps be curved to present the least obstacle possible on the sidewalk. The application has also been revised so that the elevator is an interior element, accessed through double doors at the top of the steps. The stone at the base of the windows is to be replaced with wood kickplates, to replicate those seen in the original photo. Staff sincerely commends the applicants for their cooperation and willingness to restore this building, which will contribute a great deal to the historic character of downtown. On the new elevation, the architect stopped short of drawing in the mullion which is to run through the center of the display windows (as seen in the original photo), and some of the other details due to time constraints and the desire to fully study the fagade and make the restoration accurate. Staff suggests that the HPC allow this level of detail to be resolved with the project monitors. There are however, a few issues for the HPC as a group to discuss before the design is finalized. The first issue is whether or not the columns on the storefront are original and/or are in the original location. The best "head-on" photo of the building, from 1978 show the columns closer together, so that their outer edges align with the outer edges of the two central windows on the upper floor. Today, those columns lie outside those window frames. Additionally, it seems that the base of the columns would have aligned with the base of the kickplates, further suggesting that they have been altered. Second, after studying the original photograph at length, and using the people in the photo to judge relative heights, it is staffs belief that the door threshold was one step lower than shown in the proposed plan. (It would seem that historically, one took another step up upon entering the store.) With the threshold lowered accordingly and the doors 2 I. 6 .... reduced from 8'6" to 7', it is possible to recreate the transom shown above them in the historic picture. Finally, the HPC should decide whether or not there should be benches placed in front of the kickplates, as appears to be the case in the old photo. In the proposed new plan, the applicant has shown benches and flower pots placed in this area. At the last meeting, no objections were raised about the proposal to re-open the original window openings that have been bricketi in on the north and south facades. The applicant will have to provide specifications on the replacement windows, which should match the profile and detailing of those on the front fagade as closely as possible. The applicant also proposed to strip the paint off of the brick, which staff recommends only be pursued if the method of paint removal, and test patches are approved by the monitors. b. The proposed development reflects and is consistent with the character of the neighborhood of the parcel proposed for development. Response: The applicant' s proposal to return to a centered entryway, and restore other elements ofthe building, is very appropriate to the historic district and is commendable. c. The proposed development enhances or does not detract from the historic significance of designated historic structures located on the parcel proposed for development or adjacent parcels. Response: The project will not affect the significance of this historic structure, which was built in 1885. Forgiving some unsympathetic alterations done in the past, this is an excellent example of a Victorian commercial building and exhibits very ornate detailing for an early period in Aspen' s development. d. The proposed development enhances or does not diminish or detract from the architectural character and integrity of a designated historic structure or part thereof. Response: With some modifications and refinement of the design, the project will enhance the architectural character and integrity of this historic structure. ALTERNATIVES: The HPC may consider any of the following alternatives: • Approve the application as submitted. • Approve the application with conditions to be met prior to issuance of a building permit. 3 • Table action to allow the applicant further time for restudy. (Specific recommendations should be offered.) • Deny approval finding that the application does not meet the Development Review Standards. RECOMMENDATION AND RECOMMENDED MOTION: Staff recommends that the HPC give the applicant direction in regard to the columns flanking the entry, the appropriate level for the door threshold, and the height of the doors themselves, and the proposal to have benches and planters along the base of the building. Once these issues are resolved, staff recommends that the final details of the storefront be approved by staff and monitor. Exhibits: A. Staff memo dated February 23,2000. B. Turn of the century photograph. C. Application. D. Minutes of January 26,2000. 3 - 3 \7 22 \ 2/N -f 6/P- ¢Pt'>fiN \ 4 - 1 11\ 04 -90 f y 4 04 4 ·4 /+P y J 4-1 1 M - 1 I /346 4 ASPEN HISTO_ -_ 2 PRESERVATION COMMI Uk.~l ON MINUTES OF, FEBRUARY 23, 2000 David said the bathroom moves to another part of the house. They would like to have a window that comes out of the east wall of the west wing and they would be going through the historic wall but the window is not historic. Staff explained that it would be on the historic house facing the courtyard. No comments from the board. 312 SOUTH GALENA - MINOR DEVELOPMENT - PH John Davis and Tom Schutz were sworn in. Amy informed the board that the Engineering Dept. is willing to grant an encroachment license to let the steps come slightly into the sidewalk so that they can bring the door into the building more forward. Staff has two concerns and one is that the two columns flanking the doorway are within the window frames above and the drawing now shows them slightly wider apart. Looking at the original photograph o f the building the threshold is below the top o f the kick plate not at the top o f the kick plate and that needs to be discussed in order to get the transom above the entry doors and all the features that were original. On the issue of stripping the brick more investigation needs done to make sure the brick is not damaged. Applicant: Tom Schutz said the columns have been re-clad and are fatter than they were. The structure is still inside the easement. Historically the front 2/3 is newer than the back 1/3. The back is masonry bearing and the front hal f has steel bearing columns. It is the intent to replace and replicate the existing columns. Regarding the kick plate they are trying to establish reference points and even counting the blocks on the sides the biggest difference is the height of the sidewalk. During reconstruction we will know what really happened. Staff relayed that stripping the paint off the brick needs to be tested and approved by staff and monitor. 4 ASPEN HIST€ 2 PRESERVATION COMMI._ON MINUTES On FEBRUARY 23. 2000 John Davis said he restored a building in Detroit and sandblasting was prohibited. He did a chemical deal that was water based and nontoxic. He will research the product. It is important that the door height be the same height as the floor inside. Amy suggested a step up after you get through the doors. Tom relayed having it level is a better solution. The north side which is the alley side is going to be restored. The roof top equipment will be presented at a later date. John Davis said the broiler in the basement has already been replaced. The chair opened and closed the public hearing. The board preferred that the panes be replaced and retain the mullions. All historic glass should be retained. Je ffrey suggested retaining the proportions of the west windows or at least brings them back to what was historic. The columns need to be looked at after the easement is removed. Gilbert said the placement of the elevator being pushed back so that the elevator doors are not facing the street is a good solution. Gilbert dittoed Amy and Jeffrey regarding the columns. Gilbert supports the threshold configuration. The transom should be replicated and the doors shortened to accommodate that. 8.6" doors are quite tall. The storefront mullions should replicate the historic configuration. Mary supports Amy's memo regarding the threshold. She also feels that the storefront mullions should replicate the historic configuration. Susan also said the storefront windows should replicate the Jewett Grocery windows. Pushing the elevator back is commendable. She is uncertain about the step up recommended by Staff. reopening the windows is appropriate. 5 . ASPEN HISTO ..A C PRESERVATION COMME-_ON MINUTES OF, FEBRUARY 23, 2000 Lisa agreed with Gilbert regarding the threshold and transoms. The columns should carefully be explored. Christie also agreed with the six panes of glass and that the columns should be explored. She also felt that an awning would be appropriate. Suzannah said she would like to see a restudy of the doors and transom. Applicant Tom said he felt that all of the issues could be addressed. MOTION: Gilbert moved to approve 312 S. Galena with the following conditions: 1. The location, conditions and possible restoration of the columns be confirmed and revie-w after demolition discovery with stajfand monitor. 2. The proposed new windo-w on the south elevation to be reviewed by stajf and monitor. 3. That the storefront multions replicate the historic configuration and that staff and monitor will review the details. 4. Confirm the existence of the condition of the historic glass during demolition and discovery and review with staff and monitor. 5. The replication of the transom configuration above the entry door shall match the historic storefront per staff's memo. 6. The process for brick restoration shall be reviewed and approved by staff and monitor. 7. A speckfor the replacement windows on the north elevation needs submitted. 8. More information about the elevator tower needs submitted and anything else on the roof top. Motion second by Christie. All in favor, motion carried 7-0. Yes vote: jeffrey, Gilbert, Suzannah, Mary, Susan, Lisa, Christie 213 W. BLEEKER - LANDMARK DESIGNATION - CONCEPTUAL Amy informed the board that her only concern is the demolition of the kitchen area, which shows up on the 1904 map. Staff is recommending retaining that addition. 6 MEMORANDUM TO: Aspen Historic Preservation Commission THRU: Julie Ann Woods, Community Development Director Joyce Ohlson, Deputy Planning Director FROM: Amy Guthrie, Historic Preservation Officer RE: 312 S. Galena Street- minor review DATE: January 26,2000 SUMMARY: The applicant requests LIPC approval to renovate the entrance to 312 S. Galena, which is a designated landmark, to restore original window openings. and to remove the paint from the historic masonry. APPLICANT: The Aspen Downtown, LLC, represented by Mark Haldeman, partner. LOCATION: 312 S. Galena Street, the north 32 feet of Lots K and L, and the north 30 feet of Lot M, Block 95, City and Townsite of Aspen. MINOR DEVELOPMENT No approval for any development in the "H," Historic Overlay District, or involving historic landmarks shall be granted unless the Historic Preservation Commission finds that all of the following standards (Section 26.415.010.B.4) are met: a. The proposed development is compatible in general design, scale, site plan, massing and volume with designated historic structures located on the parcel and with development on adjacent parcels when the subject site is in an "H," Historic Overlay District, or is adjacent to an historic landmark. For historic landmarks where proposed development would extend into front yard, side yard and rear yard setbacks, extend into the minimum distance between buildings on the lot, exceed the allowed floor area by up to five hundred (500) square feet, or exceed the allowed site coverage by up to five (5) percent, the ~ Historic Preservation Commission may grant necessary variances after making a finding that such variation is more compatible in character with the historic landmark and the neighborhood than would be development in accord with dimensional requirements. In no event shall variations pursuant to this Section exceed those variations allowed under Section 26.520.040(B)(2), for detached accessory dwelling units. 1 13/1,libl b « Response: Attached are a series of drawings and photographs showing the original entry to this building, and later remodels. As viewed in the oldest photo, depicting the E. W. Jewett grocery store, the building featured the classic storefront of that era, divided into three bays, with a recessed entry in the middle. Also characteristic of that period were the large display windows with transoms above them. Important to note in this picture is the large platform in front of the store that allowed entrance into the building with just one step up from the sidewalk. The second picture is circa 1930's. The platform is removed and there is a ramp to the front door. The lower half of the windows are boarded up. The third photograph is from 1978, when the Eagles Club occupied the ground floor. The storefront was covered up and a staircase had been added in front of the building. In 1980, the building was renovated again for Ebbe's nightclub. At this point the entry was moved to the north end of the building, with new entry stairs and new windows. The last photograph shows the building as it appears today. The applicant' s have purchased the structure and plan to renovate it for retail use on the ground floor, and office or living space on the second floor. They propose to return to a centered entry, and showed it recessed fairly deeply from the front of the building (approximately 11 feet) to create a landing, separate entries into the new retail units, and an elevator for access to the upper floors. The plan reflects their desire to have 24 hour access to the elevator, without having to create a "lobby" or airlock that would eat into net leasable space. The doors that are shown centered in their new entry are elevator doors, and the elevator proposed is all glass, so that the workings are visible. From the initial discussions with the owners of this building, staff encouraged them to look for original photographs, and for opportunities to restore the building. It is very fortunate that the photos available are clear enough to allow a complete reconstruction of the entry if that were desired. The most significant obstacle in recreating the original entry is caused by the stairs needed to reach the first floor level. As noted above, the building originally had a high platform in front of it, and later a ramp up to the door. Neither of these options are possible now. In the days of the Eagles Club, the staircase sat in the public right-of-way, which is generally discouraged now. In reviewing this proposal, it is staff s strong opinion that the entry proposed does not accurately reflect the historic character of the building, and that it is important to come as close as possible to the design shown in the turn of the century photograph. The important characteristics of that entry include the depth the doors are set in from the front faGade (approximately 4 feet), the wide double doors and slightly angled wall plane to the doors, and the transom windows. As mentioned earlier, the proposed new entry is 11 feet from the front of the building. The central entry doors are a narrower set of elevator doors (which the applicant has suggested could be either somewhat Victorian in 2 character, or clearly modern, glass doors.) The doorways into the shops are on a more significant angle from the front of the building than was the case with the same wall planes in the original entry. Staff' s primary recommendation is to either remove the elevator from the elements being accomodated in the main entry. or to create an interior lobby space which removes the elevator from view on the main fa~ade. The applicant has also investigated installing the elevator on the north side of the building, where a large display window currently exists. This is also preferred over the proposed design. Secondly, staff finds that the entry must reflect the original characteristics described above, and that it must be moved forward, as close to the original four foot recess from the front fagade as possible. A rough sketch (attached) shows the entry moving to within 7 feet of the front faQade. Also, staff has contacted the Engineering Department about the possibility of allowing one or two of the steps to extend into the sidewalk. Although this type of sidewalk obstruction is generally not acceptable to them, it was noted that a similar accommodation was made for the Elk's Building, and that if the sidewalks are eventually widened as part of DEPP, the steps would have little impact. Staff recommends that the applicant be required to pursue these two options and return to HPC for approval. Staff also recommends that the new storefront accurately reflect the dimension of the band of transom windows, and that the applicant consider recreating the original mullion pattern that divided the display windows into six panes. The project includes a few other elements; opening windows that have been bricked in on the north and south facades, reconfiguring mechanical equipment, and removal of the paint from the brick and stone. Staff recommends that the applicant be approved to re- open the original window openings, which are the typical tall and narrow proportion, with a brick arch above. The other openings, which are more square, do not follow the historic window pattern and are presumably not original. The HPC may want to consider allowing new window openings in the north wall if they can be designed to be in character with the historic windows. The applicant will be required to specify what the new windows will be, to confirm that the profile will be appropriate to the style of the building. In regard to removing the paint, staff finds that this may be appropriate, depending on confirmation that the gentlest means possible will be used to remove the paint, and that the brick and stone are in good condition (often buildings were painted to mask problems.) Test patches will be required. b. The proposed development reflects and is consistent with the character of the neighborhood of the parcel proposed for development. Response: While the specific design for the entry requires additional study, the applicant' s proposal to return to a centered entryway, and restore other elements of the building, is very appropriate to the historic district and is commendable. 3 e. The proposed development enhances or does not detract from the historic significance of designated historic structures located on the parcel proposed for development or adjacent parcels. Response: The project will not affect the significance of this historic structure, which was built in 1885. Forgiving some unsympathetic alterations done in the past, this is an excellent example of a Victorian commercial building and exhibits very ornate detailing for an early period in Aspen' s development. d. The proposed development enhances or does not diminish or detract from the architectural character and integrity of a designated historic structure or part thereof. Response: Staff' s concern is that the proposed design for the entry does not enhance the architectural character of the building. ALTERNATIVES: The HPC may consider any of the following alternatives: • Approve the application as submitted. • Approve the application with conditions to be met prior to issuance of a building permit. • Table action to allow the applicant further time for restudy. (Specific recommendations should be offered.) • Deny approval finding that the application does not meet the Development Review Standards. RECOMMENDATION AND RECOMMENDED MOTION: Staff recommends that the proposal be continued to February 23rd for restudy of the entry. Exhibits: A. Staff memo dated January 26,2000. B. Turn o f the century photograph. C. Circa 1930's photograph. D. 1978 photograph. E. 1980 drawing. F. Current photograph. G. Alternative entry sketch. H. Classic Victorian storefront sketch. I. Application. 4 ASPEN HISTL 1-1 C PRESERVATION COMM _ ION MINUTES OF, JANUARY 26, 2000 Heidi said generally skylights blend in but in this case it is a separate element. Scott said being on the ridge the skylight had to be supported in another way. Mary informed the board that the beam supports the skylight within. Jeffrey asked for clarification of the finished product as it is exposed. Scott relayed 2 14 feet and the profile off the roof is 6 96 inches. Amy informed the board that the skylight is not on the historic house. The main issue is the contact between the applicant and board in order for the board to be aware of what is happening on the property. Mary relayed to the applicant and board that the project was controversial with a 4-3 vote and the fair and respectful thing would have been to make a phone call to the monitor or preservation officer. HISTORIC PRESERVATION DESIGN GUIDELINES - PH Vice-chair Mary Hirsch opened and closed the public hearing. MOTION: Jeffrey moved to continue the public hearing on the Historic Preservation Design Guidelines to February 13rd 3. second by Heidi. All in favor, motion carried. 312 SOUTH GALENA STREET - MINOR REVIEW - PUBLIC HEARING - RESO #4,2000 John Davis 346 Lewis Lane Tom Schutz 520 S. Original St. Amy relayed that the front faGade would return back to the original storefront on the building. Windows that were bricked up would be opened up and the paint would be removed from the masonry on the building. The building was previously called the Jewett grocery store. The main obstacle in the restoration is the staircase that is required to get up to the original 2 - -EAL A, -ED I ., ASPEN HISTO] PRESERVATION COMMIS IN MINUTES OF, JANUARY 26. 2000 floor level. Staff recommends that the entry doors come forward to the front of the building. Another approach would be to move the stairs into the sidewalk. In 1994 the HPC allowed the windows to be bricked in. Staff is in favor of opening up the original windows. Studies will have to be done regarding the removal of the paint. Proo f o f notice was submitted to the Clerk' s o ffice as Exhibit I. Applicants presentation: Tom Schutz, architectural firm, Philos International, represented the owners. The primary objection is to return to a central entrance, Exhibit II. The columns and brickwork on the front have been kept the same. At some point the main floor level was raised. Instead o f six inches off the sidewalk it is now 30 inches. The over-ride for the elevator might project on the roof. There is a proposed central entrance, set back off the sidewalk to a landing and doors at 45 degrees entering into proposed lease spaces with an elevator centrally located. The elevator is critical in the renovation and reuse o f the building. It will service the basement and primarily the second floor. The idea of moving the steps out to the fagade is a great idea because that helps alleviate the sense of the entrance being pushed into the building. The intent o f the elevator is to utilize glass panels for the doors and sides giving a translucent feel but the framework for the elevator door, side panels will be period details similar to the doors entering into the leased spaces. Victorian base and jams and wainscoting will be incorporated. The details on either side would wrap around in front o f the elevator. On the alley elevation, which is the north, the four existing bricked in windows would be restored to operable windows. There are two other windows, which were original to the building, and those would be opened back up for light. The south elevation also has an original opening which is proposed to be opened back up for additional lighting. John Davis indicated that staff s memo referred to reducing the vestibule in size and the reason the building sits empty is because it was a building that had one tenant and it doesn't work with one tenant. They are trying to create the possibility ofmultiple tenants. Clarifications and questions. 3 h f ASPEN HISTL---C PRESERVATION COMM_ - -ION MINUTES OF, JANUARY 26.2000 Lisa inquired about the alley as an access and the applicant explained due to the truck traffic and the fact that the building is built to the property line it would not be feasible. Heidi inquired about the stone and when it was added. Amy stated that she feels the stoop was removed and the floor level was changed. Some of the stone might be original and some isn't due to the way the front of the building was altered. Heidi suggested a common airlock. Tom relayed that the difficulty in doing that is the way the doors swing and there is the landing condition at the top of the stairs. Susan asked about the possibility of lowering the first floor to the street level. Tom informed the board that the height ofthe basement would then be below 5' 6" and not a functional space. Susan also agreed that the window panes in the front should be returned to as close to the original as possible. John Davis said six panes on each side existed on the original photo. Tom relayed that the awnings are at the top of the transom window. Gilbert clarified that the elevator serves three stops. The building has an entrance at sidewalk level. Would there be the possibility of taking that sidewalk elevation and getting inside and going up a few stairs as opposed to changing the entire floor level. Internal stairs could occur within the stores in addition to the use o f the elevator. The elevator is not intended to serve the first level. That would preserve most of the basement space. Amy felt that the disturbing part of the fagade is not having the door level relating to the floor level. Tom researched and the majority of retail stores that are located in historic buildings on Galena Street step up into a vestibule area. 4 f 1 ASPEN HISTOR PRESERVATION COMMIS N MINUTES OF, JANUARY 26.2000 Jeffrey asked if the applicant did an inspection to see where the foundation meets with the historic framing, which would be rough sawn. The applicant relayed that no walls were exposed. Amy presented a photo from 1980 indicating the change in the entrance. Lisa and Christie agreed with staff comments in the memo regarding the windows and also agreed that the central entrance is appropriate. Lisa reserved judgement on the elevator until further information is obtained. Vice-chair Mary Hirsch opened the public hearing and closed the public hearing. Comments The board was encouraged about the direction o f the project and the restoration o f the front faG ade and building. Restoration of the original openings is commendable, i.e. north. Some sort of step up starting outside of the building is preferable. There was concern about the modern elevator and further study is recommended. HPC prefers a faQade similar to the Jewett grocery and they feel that is a compromise. If the elevator comes closer to the front it would be an impact to the over run on top. The elevator needs restudied in its design, i.e. screened from the street and some kind o f setback off the street. A meeting with the Engineering Dept. regarding the steps will be scheduled. Generally the board supported staff s recommendation. This building is a landmark in the commercial historic core and steps going out into the street are an historical element of Aspen. Applicant's comments: John Davis said if we are to do vestibule doors that open out, a three- foot landing is code. Amy said that her interpretation is that the Building Dept. wants a landing that is wide as the door swings. If the stairs go into the sidewalk a handrail will be required. 5 / \ ASPEN HIST [C PRESERVATION COM1V_ _ _;ION MINUTES Olin JANUARY 26.2000 John said the second floor ceiling is at the level at where the elevator is going to come up which is around I 6 feet tall. Hopefully the mechanical s will not project. John also informed the board that they have communicated with the Building Dept. regarding removal of the interior of the building, which will occur Friday after the purchase of the building. Regarding the solution it will all be determined on how far the city wiltlet us go out into the sidewalk. The best case scenario is that two stairs out would be permissible and then go three feet in. Staff will schedule a meeting with the Engineering Dept. Tom relayed that numerous scenarios were looked at with the elevator stairs etc. One of the factual pieces of safety in architecture is the most dangerous number of stairs in any flight of stairs is one. It is because you really don't see one step in front of you. The elevator photograph is misleading. The elevator doors will match the doors on either side and have the same j am and ceil detail. MOTION: Heidi moved to continue the public hearing and minor review on 312 S. Galena Street until February 23rd with the following condition: 1) Restudy of the entry. 2) Restudy of the storefront so that it more closely replicates the historic storefront. Motion second by Susan. Yes Vote: Jejfrey, Gilbert, Mary, Susan, Christie, Heidi, Lisa. Motion carried 7-0. MOTION: Heidi moved to adjourn; second by Christie. All in favor, motion carried. Meeting adjourned at 6:30 p.m. Kathleen J. Strickland, Chie f Deputy Clerk 6 P ' ASPEN/PITKIN COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT City of Aspen Development Application Fee Policv . 61 A i v,3)l/k.2,2.__ , la,e~. 0(- * 72:XMD The City of Aspen. pursuant ro Ordinance -49-(Series of 1998), has established a fee sIr'ucture for the processing of iand use applications. A flat fee or deposit is collected for land use applications based on the type of application submitted. Referral fees for other City departments reviewing the application will also be collected when necessary. One check including the deposit for Planning and referral agency fees must be submitted with each land use application. made payable to the Aspen/'Pitkin Community Development Department. Applications will not be accepted for processing without the required application fee. A ilat fee is collected by Community Development for Administrative Approvals which normally take a minimal and predictable amount of staff time to process. The fee is not refundable. A deposit is collected by Community Development when more extensive staff review is required. as hours are likely to vary substantially from one application to another. Actual staff time spent will be charged against the deposit. Several different staff members may charge their Iime spent on the case in addition to the case planner. Staff time is logged to the case and Staff can provide a summary report of hours spent at the applicants request. After the deposit has been expended. the applicant will be billed monthly based on actual staff hours. Applicants may accrue and be billed additional expenses for a planners time spent on the case following any hearing or approvals. up until the applicant applies for a building permit. Current billings must be paid Within 30 days or processing of the application will be suspended. If an applicant has previously failed to pay application fees as required, no new or additional applications will be accepted for processing until the outstanding fees are paid. In no case will Building Permits be issued until all costs associated with case processing have been paid. When the case planner determines that the case is completed (whether approved or not approved), the case is considered closed and any remaining balance from the deposit will be refunded to the applicant. Applications which require a deposit must include an Agreement for Payment of Development Application Fees. The Agreement establishes the applicant as being responsible for payment of all costs associated with processing the application. The Agreement must be signed by the party responsible for payment and submitted with the application and fee in order for a land use case to be opened. The current complete fee schedule for land use applications is listed on the reverse side. ASPEN/PITKIN COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT Agreement for Payment of City of Aspen Development Application Fees CITY OF ASPEN (hereinafter CITY) and (hereinafter APPLICANT) AGREE AS FOLLOWS: 1. APPLICANT has submitted:o CITY an application for (hereinafter. THE PROJECT). Kia ' /- .22/00 2. APPLICANT understands and agrees that City of Aspen Ordinance Ner·49-(Series of !998+ establishes a fee strucrure for Land Use appiications and the payment of all processing fees is a conditiOn precedent to a determination of appiication completeness. APPLICANT and CITY agree that because of the size, nature or scope o f the proposed project. it is not possible at this time to ascertain the full extent of the costs involved in processing the application. APPLICANT and CITY further agree rhar it is in the interest of tile par[ies that APPLICANT make payment of an initial deposit and to thereafter permit additional costs to be billed to APPLICANT on a monthly basis. APPLICANT agrees additional costs may accrue foilowing their hearings and/or approvals, APPLICANT agrees he will be benefited by retaining greater cash liquidity and will make additional payments upon notification by the CITY when they are necessary as costs are incurred. CITY agrees it will be benefited through the greater certainty of recovering its full costs to process APPLICANT'S application. 4. CITY and APPLICANT further agree that it is impracticable for CITY staff to complete processing or present sufficient information to .he Planning Commission and/or City Council to enable the Planning Commission and/or City Council to make legally required findings for project consideration. unless current billings are paid in full prior to decision. 5. Therefore. APPLICANT agrees that in consideration of the CITY's waiver of its right to collect full fees prior to a determination of application completeness. APPLICANT shall pay an initial deposit in the amount of 5 4973 which is for -2., G hours of Community Development staff time. and if actual recorded COSIS exceed tile initial deposit. APPLICANT shall pay additional monthly billings to CITY to reimburse the CITY for the processing of the application mentioned above, including post approval review. Such periodic payments shall be made within 30 days of the billing date. APPLICANT further agrees that failure to pay such accrued costs shall be grounds for suspension of processing, and in no case will building permits be issued until all costs associated with case processing have been paid. CITY OF ASPEN APPLICANT . By: ~1./1 pr. /7 0 j /1 04-.tri D_ #lie Ann Woods Ltommunity Development Director Date: 4 4 (fl ~ C fb ' Mailing Address: / 377 SK»X) (di-, n)99 00 J 4%404 00 8}6, / / ATTACHMENT 1 LAND USE APPLICATION FORM 1. Project name The Andre's Building 2. Project location 312 S. Galena St., Aspen, CO 81611 Block 95, Lot K thru M, North 32' of K & L, North 30' of M. (indicate street address, lot and block number or metes and bounds description) 3. Present zoning CC 4. Lot size 2820 sqft. 5, Applicant's name, address and phone number Aspen Downtown,L.L.C. 312 S. Galena St., Aspen, CO 81611 (970) 925-2865 6. Representative's name, address, and phone number Mark Haldeman 1377 Snowbunny Ln., Aspen, CO 81611 (970) 379-3372 7. Type of application (check all that apply): Conditional Use Conceptual SPA Conceptual HPC Special Review Final SPA Final HPC 8040 Greenline Conceptual PUD x Minor HPC Stream Margin Final PUD Relocation HPC Subdivision TexUMap Amend. Historic Landmark GMQS allotment GMQS exemption Demo/Partial Demo View Plane Condominiumization Design Review Lot Split/Lot Line Appeal Committee Adjustment 8. Description of existing uses (number and type of existing structures, approximate sq. ft., number Of bedrooms, any previous approvals granted to the property) Commercial Higtnrirhnilding (7 story) consisting of approximatelv 10.300sqft. of retail/restaurant space. basement-2,800sqft. ground floor & mezzanine-4,700sqft. second floor-2,800sqft. 9. Description of development application Restore front facade to historic center entry and restore natural brick and red stone. Open/restore orginal window openings on north and south facade. 10. Have you completed and attached the following? x Attachment 1- Land use application form x Attachment 2- Dimensional requirements form X Response to Attachment 3 X Response to Attachment 4 January 11, 2000 Aspen Historic Preservation Commission 130 S. Galena St. Aspen, CO 81611 RE: Attachment 4, Aspen Historic Preservation Commission, Minor Development Review To Whom lt May Concern, Applicant: The Aspen Downtown L.L.C. Ownership: John Davis, Gary Nichols, Steven Bellotti, and Mark Haldeman. Property Description: The Andre's Building, located at 312 South Galena Street, in Aspen, Colorado. Legal description is Block 95, Lot K thru Lot M, the North 32' of K & L, and the North 30' of M. Description of Proposal: Applicant desires to remodel the existing facade of the subject property to include a center entry and elevator at the ground floor level o f the structure. Applicant desires to restore the natural brick and red stone facade, and open/restore the original window openings on the north exterior wall and the south exterior wall. Compliance with Review Standards Relevant to the Development: Applicant' s remodel greatly improves the existing structure. By including a center entry, restoring the natural brick and red stone facade, and restoring the original window openings of the structure, applicant is bringing the structure back to the condition and configuration as it appeared when it was built in 1885. Signed as authorized agent and partner; 4107-1 4-~ 9-- ' Mark J. I-Ixttleman ATTACHMENT 2 DIMENSIONAL REQUIREMENTS FORM Applicant: Agppn Ilnwntnwn, L.T,.C. Address: 312 S. Galena St., Aspen, CO 81611 Zone district: CC Lot size: 2820 sqft. approximately 90x30 Existing FAR: Allowable FAR: 1.5-1 = 4.230saft. Proposed FAR: Maintain existing Existing net leasable (commercial): Approximately 9,300 Proposed net leasable (commercial): Maintain existing Existing % of site coverage: 100% Proposed % of site coverage: 100% Existing % of open space: 0% Proposed % of open space: 0% Existing maximum height: Principal bldg: 38.5' Accesory bldg: Proposed max. height: Principal bldg: 38.5' Accessory bldg: Proposed % of demolition: Less than 5% Existing number of bedrooms: Proposed number of bedrooms: Existing on-site parking spaces: On-site parking spaces required: Setbacks Existing: N/A Minimum required: Proposed: Front:. Front: Front: Rean Rear: Rear: Combined Combined Combined Fronurear: Fronurear. FronUrear: Side: Side: Side: Side: Side: Side: Combined Combined Combined Sides: Sides: Sides: Existing nonconformities or encroachments: Adiacent building to south encroaches onto this property bv aproximately 1'6" Variations requested: NONE. (HPC has the ability to vary the following requirements: setbacks, distance between buildings, FAR bonus of up to 500 sq.ft., site coverage variance up to 5%, height variations underthe cottage infill program, parking waivers for residential uses in the R-6, R-15, RMF, CC, and O zone districts) # i C, . 'Ir ABLd/FI' 79/k,h- rn..a yier., · N Al,el#Y~-~4#.#44+44 A)127. &,·,· ' Ave Star Adventures Jeop & Scenic Tours i k A *5#*MI/43~45~:'*' · //,N:&1¢P=-14'. '. .h,/9: $ 0, CaN 544-4700 1 1 65:*.-$)-.7. m , ¥ ffy / inei~ i.. liv p. 'm - 0.1 . 1 . , FIFTH AVE CONDOMNIUMS-- - THE , 4 URANT ,0.--•d~ d<4) 1 :x, Jc.. FASCHING -~~~ f~ AJAX CONDOMINIUMS i~ (4. ASPEN MINIUMS / HAUS . /1 v . , .,I' 24 /14\ 2- . ® ==r 4 ~13196 1 j / ALPENDUCK0~2*-J.1 ~~ Little Nell I 1 GALENA PLACE -~CONDOMINIUMS ' CONDOMINIUM QUAD CHAIR ~ THE UTTLE NELL The Italian Caviar THE GRAND ASPEN HOTEL Ala* Tippler {oftice) --ADOK 7~~c-Q'~~*~i<~~~~~ , -=~ ._-I- ~{31[ 11 TIPPLEINN ~iline,Wail Tavern - 1 '4% I --0 The Ristaurant&Bar alll-LIWINell ~ --6-, Asp- Sports 1 L' . NORTH OF NELL CONDOMINIUMS AL ' n Maxnelds Bar & Gnlle Aaspberry• DEAN· S -ter,- =~ Nomp, OF NELL BLOG , The Alternative C/) I-/-1.=r----LL - r: •:· 9 ./... m. 0 F~WIC.Rest,ta~.0. i,,1,1 11,~-~,„,1-1,1:,6,~imllQ~-lr~-11, . ,„ Edge ~ il 1, 1,11,NI/7/1 , --1 U.V.,1. .W. '41.U. 11.1. 11 .1.4-. 1 =9[El[-11-1~ /- 1 b N=.1 r,"r,9.-r _I ,%5,Iw,n -~~|,:I,I:„F„~ar'iKE~'El€·(€'"5: ;t~~m- ~ f~~~~~IN'RiI' -3+1: Aipen Book Ston Ollity Ski Shop ~ ~1~Ul' ~ 11.;9 0 J n j J ·OIl r,11- 11, r,:1~j{'t]'1 lilliy·fl,!i ' < A-h h /h- LODGE High Society ~~f 3:50 -*~ne&340/eZ~ger 13 1 c , P-1 Perfect. CHATEAU- Cl....... Compaa CHAUMONT DUMONT q Star Umousine I 379-2118 -1.- - AJAX M TN. BLDG Ski Service Center# ~ .-rr 1 Board Werks .'.4 peaches en RegaW Ross Andrews/Designer I Stefan Kae#n PR fer Men F,ne Jewelry I pro Shop Porneroy Sports - r- 01 Aspen Harrulton Sports DAE Snowboard Shop --7//~*CH--7 kjt, DURANT MALL Ulibarrirs Hal Jol, Boyce Ltd. FI, Jewelry Cale Ink! Coffee & Bagets ~ L '~ 1 ,/WIN'Wililimi Designers .1 --tR-4.In.-ec>. . WEL v.4.=-GLP'' 1 op.ca, op"ons -4„21==12&2 661,Am Ed Mang. Reamy Inc. UJIN@11.He- 8.== E=.=MEN. (upstalrs) __-a-915848· ~*~~~"eg*CU~ Spor, 1 -:IZE:SI:I[(jij) The Shivt Man 169412/#WLP+61 ASPEN SQUARE CONDOMINIUM HOTEL ASPEN GROVE MALL (Formerly Shi.quel East End The Gre# Block of Ampen iLL~.4-~**I)-* p-*m-,- Aspen Susan Auval Galer¥ Rcots canada ~ Gourm•t Wistim - - 1 Ski Det,catess,n Grog Shop ®ti Durant St. Vkdoo 2,9. Im mwt. 1"•9 ''·' '•" r.-Luggago· Spotted Hon.Gall.,IL INDEPENDENCE - ~6=mmm=6 City M.,h/ S LITub IMMAM<~41AJ ..= -,- ·-~IM,Tjl~[ICiT-Imilin/399 co Kieselstein-Cord ez°Cl-1 (TheArt./ptiks|=11~EN: =C le (1 ifillillillill:W:: A."~'-/ 15;152;5~/'/ GaMefy ' XS~· C~OPERAVE. AUU-L' CE E. COOPER AVE. HUNTER PLAZA Satterfield-REALTORS. Inc Pierre/Femilie ~ t> Ce 2%29 60..dy ~ <7 John Atencto Aspen Art Supp4 Cooper Street Classic and Designer Jewelfy Ram Jowelry ||111|". ===202 CHAT'•,1..... Lety Frame It Johnny - \-=MJHwall Kkis ~ E==i=je-1-- 7~Q~mt==crintry villago Bo,gi~~ cheque„ .LIA=,ralis.Bakery'~ jt~*2.~=47r-„--- 6 ~ * no's MCGUIre'B 1-na Delicatessen 69> .1.irt--,0~ Ute City Brok,FS Q© 4? + CEN,- 1 11, t121 1 Daniels 4~07. -- LEKILLI!1#|AU~ T- 1 92?ifii') E- SQUARE (56,) L-JL~ 844.EE~ r---'eV,York Pizza fl Blue Mize AL L) -,Sl The Optical E- FF-=1 .7..A James Coleman McSto,tle's Pub B-dE, IMTU,7 /ER m Alax BH. ~~~*Il~**f~ 4.-=-,1 ==M=m==Rn.b- *:~ t 9. 1-mmlm, , H-tsmarl Ga#ery Little Wind R~wer-'€U' Fine Jewelers 121164' WIIWEI# m fa m Joshua 8 Co. , eao Ii".05*181.M Black Peart. Aspen ¤ „ ,~ Leslie Eci,ards . 1%681 L'Equipe The Rock/ Art S-0 Asp- T-2 L--- Restaurant -Rich Wagar.Herron/Korn .---01 Fine Art Ltd.- Annle' .- Gallery - ~;' ~~~gerie '~m·: F=:*=r,;ErSZZ'Z.-:~~ Associates, LLC and Company Eahng Realtors House Bar & Gr,11 E. HYMAN AVE. A / HYMAN AVE. MALL y~ 1 ~ h; M O 63 45;45 i:5 0 445 € ractic & Sports Orthopedics Montecito Syzygy Mason & Mooe k-> Aspen Fine Art p„c, Home Furnishings/ Real Estate r /8 Lodge 1-~04 LEutopheg~aner,• seen Athletic Club LA. Salon Shabby Chic ~ MI,anda Galleriee A.- Wp*.9 --0.bl-Wwt.- - . E. S Lawrence 9 Ve{:tra Bankl~L 'sberian R.9 Co· Ga#.7 Shooters Photography oates, Reid, & Waldron· {forrn Pitkir C~B~~~M~~~~ 07.~ SportS,alker Fine Columbine --1-6- M~~~ ~~~ L'Hostaria *Ben..,26 te • Property Management _„~ H . p Saloon Houston & O'Leary • A .1 - ,##Ing/RUFM' I//2/5/1/111,1 ca,: Takah Sushl A ResoAQuest Company C B. Paws 28) s*. Epicurean Ailey rv Image Susie's Ltdl 0-7:(*) (2~ b Aspen CAREOU I L 11 2 t..11~In -b-/ Lorri. 8- Aspen The ~ ' 4 / 1 ..MO~ \-/weliness c..... ALLEY 1 - U ..16@UQNT Rover~@I*~ 1[~ / GAP, GAP lods B.1 ~ *=,r=12021& The Canbou _ - Rll~Il%~1'03*11EIMMM - tlti?**SWJ I 'MAE!,- Slifer Murphy 1%£1 A Classlc Cut Susia·. Noorts Collection Giacy' Louis Vittor/ Des-s & N,ye I D.Wit:r==215] r Ltd. - Olde low~fbr ,_~c Christian Diof Boutique E. HOPKINS AVE. Zin CO Z~16 Aspe= Fire FoxI AP-City H.3 Deepart-lent v Espies/0 - & Juice Ba,€•5 9- nr,!/7 u'°P - ~'-, W018*Ng= th &241;Ki A ~mwar 1 FN£Al [ZA IMIA'2211* ... 0 IE®1 Calkjj47) BA'~7£ 2 --- CA . - liF *~11~~ Texaco-The Aspen Store 12&191 49 4"13 + 'filiyLB . J ' The Photo Place Fartana - -1 Hour Photo -- Vint, Mnh 0 Stage 3 Theatre U Mary, Cbur€b Cleaner-Express Restaurant E 500·$ E 1./. Aspen Classic |~~~Crl F. MAIN ST 1 -9.r S. SPRI G ST. - - . ...I 1 -1 DIPOL REPAINT ALL WOOD £ & METAL TRIM .--LL, Ibe\023<sx - 9~~Sy / Lf-r-' r i f j i ' 1,4)111-006 /00 2 3~:{' <.11.114,01.....==~7-"-Jil. . ' 0 1 4- 5)0c coo . i·-4-Tif + A-44 0.0000 r 8:·MEFI'r 1 806 . !:im# 2 C 3 , ~1.: 1.124' .; , L J.~. I ~.1 ~ 1' ~-'-'i·'~L 'I I 1 ·h .1 11.1-713·314· J.-j:/..J.i€·6.-~INT-~-1.:'Lgli~-3 i.-1-~~Flt=t '. ' 4 <'| 'T i·t I .' '' ' ....9. /* 1---r-r · 1 1 1 J - .. :.,=11 1 t:Jl·-21-·' .,·1 ,6.~.--Itc 7-rk4* r t., 1 i.-E:J: . 1 ; 1.1 1.1 . .. 1 -9,1.6.*4.4.1.1 4,.1'..1- i, I....r.'14=E .... , 1 , 1 - .. ·-4, c D-f 71(,1.-20. t..4 -L· ··bir '·r r·-I7£ 1 11:.16.:.1 , , :wflt.,Lr< i..<F. .:477..Il.:1:p.. d -1.- 7-· r·.~~-----7.'·>.z,~.C.~I>7-0·M-.iL -.:,....J.,;1 -r~4 ·2*9.·'C~ .-. /~,424<~0 1. I , 1 - -, _r' f: 1- .........4:, LE,j,,TA: --g·~ 44}.*4 RESTORE . 11 f -*ft:.i·-u:: EXISTING 1 : 1 , 1, 5 41. r==1.1 1~~~ .NATURAL ... i i. :' L:.24 : - 1 BRICK 1Lr. „ . · ' 14 . -I 4 2.-»It . -2.~i·~.s€l~ i L· *ft-·' I; Ill. i 11' .1 7-*·1-'··---~- 1·10.r.1 1 ' E-'1 (- 1-·---i.Ji ........'- : .It 111 i ** Ca- 1 -1 ~144--c; »31 -7-7-I 1. 1 n : . - • .i Pul M EN M N U t' 4 - 1 2 44$4 4%,4 4 »I .4 0 6- 6.~ ..4 -d: 1 1 /4 -1 -I 6 1 - a .i *. 1-I.i. 4. L.4 61-1.1.: 1. ff-'t·12 ; 1 -94 2E ! 71,•r E-" .- - --1 -- 1 . . [ /59 .1 -7 3.7 -1 4.21 ! 11 1 - ill 4.- 11 73 - ~ 1./1 . P \ - --n ./. 11 . 4.14 P. '1 .1 1- .., 1 J., 17 -Z- tr.,47 vmt--:7 j ·Tb.·422j ~ · 1,1 4 41 . I WEST ELEVATION - GALENA STREET A A imi Sou Gale .111.1 ASPEN DEVELOPMENT CO, ~ PHILOS International. Ltd. ,1,-5 . . li - 904 01 r. WA: 4. . '= ' .3 5~.' - 1 ' 4*.'4 ri i. 0 .. 0~:,i ' · ··-·hlF .1,tr· P.-•• '- j~ i.,#.t·', 4(22 ,.,1 4 ~.f49;f- 4 ..1 ' .3,2.- i. 1 IiI " 14 *94 17*'; 41, \ : '819/4 + n . •'19·6·JI'•k. , ~Jil ·· f 9 •F 02 +Dth..:94:fial*lit.%19 *41,1/ it*12~d *11 ' --59 14,·.efr+I, , :· 4, ;m,40. .1.-QI* : - . '1 4 :1*ifit , ·1,~1:ji) -i, r..: %*V.·010, 1 i.j" il te, -fE,1,3, ,~1 ·· '2**· ~~~¢t#2 ~;:1' :12 6,<,* >'i,•.9,0 .F:,:,' 1.41 i.. 6- 0,· ... .1#Mrah'• 5,4 4,7.,1/,";1 4 22.- -:+ ~0¥*t.. 61 , t t-lt,I,G' 40~4•:~i·:~· =,. / #It>·1:4.#g'·ry,614 7 , 1 *4&'e·' ~\ 11*k / '0..=E~ . 44 i ail'I 1. %*fit:,9:34i #AN 1 ' ee ·¥44 \ ,#,41*f,ht£*1, .. / *i".,m"'4 AN "1.f,k irlit~tillEillllilMIh!,1 ---Ill - IN... ......1- + - 1 ' ···Akk £73* 17 k 64 *t=* tgn '; I .r" - I'k~f~ i 7.M:~,'J i~·41~i~jf'd£04·; ... -1- ilti;»lililll@/ *qbbQ%La13~1;<~prf*~ itT . _ . 1,~ 9 444:4 w -4 = v .• E.L ~ ' ~?IM /4" ,+I 'Il ' rjr~· 1 ~*F~# F uar'Ir Mu#-4 - 1 + If li ' f'•,4.t.~1* -'. A.21.:4#2··· g .4-'."" .~ . /0.4'. if?:¢' 4,~~4, 1.heet .3'f . 2 r -- .....1 1.. . , 461. 2 I p„e#·· ,~·w·*i%**tf4 V;1'*/ ~;41:Vi,~1, .,1,4 4,·ag' \311 ·:·~t'.'9"iwil##2 71·,1,+Ii<1·441\ VY*#*RE?121 f ~41 1 7 -~ ~~--'~.. R'- '·t' b VA,lkWK#86 i,91 .1 .9 .... ' (45 1 0 .'.16*Mer¢§4;kj..~4·~.iN.4:,1,7~2: 1 - , ..hip . -A.'7I -D %' 84*ik«,·ile.,A,im>24tjx~;, . , ~EG··*4*j'67114'4>ki; A'#4'~.1 '1 . - T fl:11.-r. >9~.4¥~ < '02.31. 2. i :64\ A,<sw:,i· , * 1, '' 1 , 1 1f C -_ .5 -' 2 bli./·.a i k SHORTEN NEW WINDOW f--1 -.~-4 IN ORIGINAL LOCATION 0-__..44.-:-=.h. Liz... ~- %.2 - h VE.144%11*le . 0.4 EL 'i'. ..• FL- ...: IL lea · 104 •'•A,r •LOOF row- %- . ' 1 63*.r> 5= ---2 312 .... South 1.2/1-M=U Galena SOUTH ELEVATION - PARTIAL t!b .m.[ 1 9 E--1 I 1 4 1 . 1 1 - --- r.. 1 1 - -72 12 NEW WINDOWS IN -1 - 'r.4 ORIGINAL OPENINGS (SHADED) 7-b 1- h 1 6 1 - 6- ' &-E:i 2-- 1 - c. 3 3 C .1 C · 1 -1 L-----4 =3 3 £....-O hc©. Ll-- -3 EL '1/ · 14 tur- 6 tr- . 1 ' t-JU- - ,- 1 &# i J_I -L 2 1 1 - r-7 -J - / 1 4- 4 »-- F n -~ Lx-.- _- . / 24- '61 - C 'i ' 1 - ub-'' natro / 11 8 - r:Ir2-f-- - L.=4 312 m mi. Soutl' Galeni NORTH ELEVATION 0, ..i 9.-- 71'1;11 U -i.mlt. 4:-3.J 1209 A-igg f ALLEY 1 1 - EXISTING WINDOW - f Ii.. . l - 11 . DISPLAY WINDOWS LEASE SPACE 1. . --~ - NEW GLASS i VICTORIAN ELEVATOR 1 . LEASE LINE I* . NEW CENTRAL ENTRY ~.,:1· i ~ - -- -- - I. .-m.. , · t r- . i DISPLAY WINDOWS LEASE SPACE i 1. 1 , .Ll F ===-fP•~~0-=2=7 312 .--7 ·-#2- 'n-:j .... South Galene PROPOSED FRONT ENTRY PLAN 4 GALENA STREET - PROPERTY LINE |L-~~~~-6,01£- d Ard.&,4.,r O 0 0 0 0 0 0 00 e . 9 ed'.0 'Ir€ * A.J.... r --- £ r* L 1 1 vd 1 G.' -14! ..oF t•08 --J Ip I I 1 1, |0. - 42tmt~- -71-- -A -------=. + 160 Ill r r .1 /1- ~r--1 'lEI 9. 16' Id *- J I 1 - Er I * - t-.-/7 +L--1 '- 11 , 1 1 A ·~ . .9 h ' I L 9 i TE c' 262*-- *- Ti, - I fri t.--/ 7- -1 4. e © rei Er " 11 0 0 11 .9.-0, - D- I r=.6 T-- pE-:PE- Erm~34 > i I v 1 1-11 1 1 4 ·I~·I _ I oft 1 A -4~11 r 1 r- L-1 -- 29 2,€~' 1 - 1 i 'r ' r.v -, - -- .... A..... i I fl 1 4.4,4/ 0,-//.0../ 4*-rilc,•fr ~/ i ' 1----1 7 ' 1 *'4~, 6*.•~U~M~ 94•~04. - , 1 / 1 1 4=·61:ru=. .-"J 0 1 - 4- *4. 44¥Mvf~ r-1 , -,1.40•/r r•I••re 1 L ..Il -./. 1-3.7 21. 1 1 1 ah ~9-- D,L' P•~ WHe - . · ~ vip r-/ /14„. h *1-6...rr 3 j 31 51 1 (At--3 2,1 , -1 3 1 2 -02=00 L ~- » rELE 1-,1 Del reef<VAL =7,9 ... -, 11: - T V re r.rAL e 1 0 1 El,1••'r'c. - 1.-._77-32521 /-\I 4~2; 61/„// N. NOT-r'& 0 1. 1./1/L ILL e.,I/* .--': ' ........~1* N M,// ·,or 8,6-ILIN.-er r•F· A..... 1 4/t IN#/6 M I /,8. NE.4 •1/6,•i·/u:.•; L,€ J leg//Irli' .L-, V==42.4-1=11-=D 312 --.--1 ke-·:47/9 m . 1 Iii , I ... i South Galena SITE 1 ROOF PLAN 1/16. mill= IE« - I.- 72/ C h. 1111 lili 11 11 lili 111 3 1 41 m lili 1111 1,1 111 1 nr=-u- LATLL-k/-11*LIZON-vtrutru-u~,»r.ru-u-&4-1./Tri/&11.1-1=-ur --- 4 - 1 - 9 1 j~i 1 1 - - 1 1 1 - Ir 1 1 11 11 1 1 - -1 11 11 --2] .- 1 'ji 11 1 1 1 1 11 111 11 11 ' 1 t 1 Lh~3 *. L.r - I -I - 9 i · F., -/7 -*40 /. / / - ./ 0/- 7- . I f.f / ..\ % .--1 1 ' 1 1, f f 4 . l :A 11 1 -,/ 1 . . 1 - A 1' --1 / 11. 1/. . / 1 --- / 11 X \11 1, 1,4 /. Iii. \. 1/1 ' / . 1 1 --1 2 .. .1 . 1 1 111 1(1 I 4 I li Ity 1\1 1 1.lili, 111 F 1 -f - Jf -1 . 1.-- i 11 1 - \ \- 1 Ir 1 --1 -- -- 1 - / .r Nk 1" EXT. CEMENT PLASTER ON SELF·FURRINA 4ALV LA'TH ATTACHED €64 4AL¥ ROOF/NG, NA/4 6 3 6 '0,0 ---i-- 04 *ISO . 1 1141«1 MEMORANDUM TO: Chiara Calufetti-Lim, Brand + Allen Architects FROM: Amy Guthrie, Aspen Historic Preservation Officer RE: 312 S. Galena Street DATE: January 22,2001 th On Friday, January 19 , I was able to meet with the "project monitors" who were assigned to oversee the recent renovation work on 312 S. Galena Street. I presented the monitors with a revised plan for the storefront of the building, provided to me by Brand + Allen Architects. The project monitors are able to approve changes to the building if they find that the changes are very minor in nature and are appropriate. If they are uncomfortable with the alterations, or if the applicant wishes to appeal the monitors' decision, the matter is taken before the entire Historic Preservation Commission. In regard to this project, the monitors viewed the proposal as an improvement to the current design. They would approve the request with two conditions; 1) that the new mullions have a simple decorative profile and 2) that all metal surfaces, other than the Prada sign, be painted rather than having a rubbed oil finish. rET:7-3NZI~™ , 24 0 •.7 :{01:IN • ** 6=~12 [. moo PROJECT DESCRIPTION PRADA / 312 S.GALENA ST. / ASPEN, CO Renovations to the fagade of the Andres Building at 312 S. Galena St. for the use of Prada as a retail store will be limited to the following areas: • Removal of the current glass and painted wood mullion grid in both the main display window and transorn window area. This will be replaced with new glass in a steel framing system including intermediate mullions dividing the glass area into the same number of panels as the current storefront. The primary difference is that the steel glazing system allows for the mullions to be reduced from an overall width of 3 14" (including glass stops) to approximately 1 3/8". This gives the mullion system a more delicate appearance simiiar to the storefront shown in the photographs of the original building. All major structural elements of the current storefront will remain. • The recessed entry area will remain the same configuration in plan view. The top of the transom above the entry doors and the top of the two angled side glass panels will align with the horizontal wood division between the main display window and the transom windows of the main storefront. The glazing system in these glass areas will be the same 1 3/8" steel frame used to replace the front windows. The ceiling of the recessed entry will be aligned with the horizontal wood division between the main display window and the transom windows of the main storefront. • The current wood entry doors and transom above will be replaced with steel and glass doors to match the new glazing system. • The major wood and stone storefront elements, other than what has been described above, will all remain with only a change to the paint color. This includes the second floor windows facing the street. Although HPC does not review paint color it is important to note that the new paint color of the wood, which will be a very dark charcoal gray, and the color of the blackened steel storefront glazing system will be very similar. This will create a unified look to the wood and steel elements. • On the alley side of the building the existing window on the second floor will all remain with only a change to the paint color. 900 NORTH PCINT STREET. SUITE 301 SAN FRANCISCO. CA. 94109 TELEPHONE 415 441 0789 FACSIMILE. 41 5.441.1089 Email: SANFRANOSCO@BRANDALLEN COM 21/123 TRANSMITTAL LETTER PROJECT Andre's Building ASPEN PROJECT NO: 0099 TO: Amy Guthrie DATE: 16 January, 2001 Community Development Dep. TEL NO: (970)-920-5096 130 Galena St. Aspen, CO 81611 FAX NO: (970)-920-5439 WE TRANSMIT: m HEREWITH D VIA FED EX STANDARD m VIA DHL m VIA MESSENGER ® VIA FED EX PRIORITY D VIA ELECTRONIC TRANSFER D VIA REGULAR MAIL m VIA FED EX ECONOMY m VIA FAX-NO. OF PAGES INCLUDING TRANSMITTAL FOR YOUR: U APPROVAL m REVIEW AND COMMENT ® RECORD ® USE THE FOLLOWING: ® DRAWINGS El SHOP DRAWINGS 0 CORRESPONDENCE D SPECIFICATIONS D SAMPLES C CHANGE ORDER ® PROJECT LITERATURE 0 PHOTOGRAPHS ACTION COPIES DATE REV. NO. DESCRIPTION CODE 10 22"x17" boards D 1 Letter ACTION CODE: A REQUIRED ACTION INDICATED ON ITEM TRANSMITTED D SEE REMARKS BELOW B FOR SIGNATURE AND RETURN TO THIS OFFICE E ORIGINAL COPY OF FAX WILL BE SENT TO YOU C FOR SIGNATURE AND FORWARDING AS NOTED BELOW UNDER REMARKS F ORIGINAL COPY OF FAX WILL NOT BE SENT TO YOU (UNLESS REQUESTED) REMARKS: Amy, Attached you will find 10 copies of the proposed elevation and a letter with the description of the project. Please call me to let me know how to proceed. Chiara Calufetti-Lim COPIES: File, Prada USA, Lorrie B Aspen. BY: Chiara Calufetti Lim 900 NORTH POINT STREET, SUITE 301, SAN FRANCISCO, CA. 94109 • TEL: 415.441.0789 • FACS: 415.441.1089 • E-MAIL: SANFRANCISCO@BRANDALLEN.COM ~-lfrill/*.1:2 i.· C V .ta ....¢*el.....'I l· 114 · '' i./.£ 3'4 - -=..Ill-I...Ill./.-I'll.-I-/& . j E- 748'*· . 4 1/ .le=:...1 .,8.10&. . - '14, - * m.9 "1. P ...3.1 I m e & - 6«4 , ~~~~~~~~~a~~~m' . AL*/1, , . 4 - --wi'"'-,04*,a/,0 ,4/dilint~'S: T#: ~teMIF :-1 .· 5#7+ t . J . r. ~. ", 4 -* .. V .8:·44 - I /€ 4 /7 .~L . 4 ' .oliall'"*..E,&......J.----=fire+*m*~t,2 I 1 -07 - % Mill/4 '459*N'·· '· . . ..... . ..... ~' ' 4 T.SES- % *€·:i.:..f¥27#;~, .. ~. : .lz v t.. #A,L Lim~m~m I.- I,%91-, #liNV~~1. **s#;69,&44¥¢ , 264. . -~ V ... ~ma¢>F , i 5.--- 4 r--~ ~ , ·=€ 3¥ V . % 4 k "· .j..2®9:4"w...,ji .....2 - . ..am: >1 . . ™ ./1 .~ e . . .. t:.. ...4 4..0 i j *1 1 b *4 - 44 1.- i 4 1 t - *>fit w . If 'Ew .9 . . C J .9. . 495. - 2 5 2 71 : 4/4.4 ·· 4 -- > 1 ... I. & 1 ·4. .1 41 er ta·- i. r-t ~ - - 1 - 3 4 14 4.10 1 * - *&'# . 6. '94 . . • · b , 1.... 4,#1 2. 1. ...1 ' 7·@a=*se'l'.':*. 0 ' .,1.41*=.5. 427. 9* ..47140 .. .*£21. A .5 cCM#r·: lf: <Ill '48;'/ . **5 37 . • €1@21- I. 31.* . . 3=.1. f r . 1 -1 : a : *. . r.sp J 1-4: 9.- Mi,-4 1-. .. 4*%.1§@ai~. 1 w -, t. % =-1.3 =-...21.1:,, 9 J.£ - -·..i390-----P#Fif ~.fj>t*%*f>-*..'-Al-: * 7#.2 1 I V '.,'. WA- :': € .....3,.6..1,11 . ' 'i.--A lA'EM .-: -a Jr ~ ~ ~· DI·,™/amil.··! · . ·· . :-,-~ :> ~ Wki - #4*#.... 2 f-114*kee 7. .: 3/5/'llimi · ' 3 -2-'646£q' 4, :.tes 1 •- ·~ · ..Glow .. · - 6.-tr.1 '.'.pall · i ·:Ip· '-49*p -_ Mi# ) A- 4 At 610 j·t ;li 3/ I 2 '~ 3 < 1 £.L· 4 ... . 7/ *2 PHOTOGRAPHS OF EXISTING FACADE ANDRE'S BUILDING 312 SOUTH GALENA ST ASPEN CO PRADA 0099 1EliZ.l212///47 " M 2 -~1 2/•1 : 1 ' M =C•~ *=I 1 2 !~ f*©ffi ' 16'.ill//UNJ#'/'A'Im W t' I 9 2 -- .N -1/- 1 A X /'. lo# 7 -* ./. -; :+3 $ E-6 21=36 1 4 - 11 - 4 /- MA - T .1> EtrA· W ' -- 4 1 1 041 . fift - =/3,1~ =al 3 2 8,1 9*'CAX. Di - - .li ..70,4 91. f ,/' ~ 42· - Liht 44 _ 75.. 1. ~ - ... 93. %1 -MI,7 4 ... ...1 1 41*f« 0 2 4 'pt# 1'' 6 0 imi '/ .4 *pit , 4 .,lin .0 1. UL. 3, .1 UE:·r• + . way &.r>.4. - /-4 d 444. h , 4 ,.·.' f' 1// *. .- ..4 44 1-1 ~ --It- . · 9.'. . 1.- 1 · 1 *...=2 .1 1 9. A , 2 r ...9 4- 4 1. . * ·rfu . 1 ./ 4 -5. \ :11, ...1 . .0. 41.0 .. :- :y.....0* ·· -2.0 S I . I ' 4/ I A-Al 2:4 2:. . i... : * ...0>*Arata-=* · r 51 4 l.': I - -*aEr - 9 4 0 */1 - 4 i , . 15~99*iene-& U C. . 1 . , 44.#, 41 .4/**rp~ 41% 1.- . li , 9 ;x,44*'Mi*J~ 1 . -.. 1 lit & T i li J j 1,1.-1.. -- t. 4'% •,p~~~~W~ ./ I ' ' 9 . "ab y. C 1.r 9 . , 91*8,7 494*- E . A.*144,4 .. :Ir I . .1 HISTORICAL PICTURE AT THE TURN OF THE CENTURY HISTORICAL PICTURE CIRCA 1930 HISTORICAL PHOTOGRAPHS PER COURTESY OF ASPEN HISTORICAL SOCIETY ANDRE'S BUILDING 312 SOUTH GALENA ST. ASPEN CO PRADA 0099 |EliE.L~il-Ell/lll *iml ={KI:Il~<9 *=1 1 241 0 s , 4 l,.. 12 * 1.. ~ I Pr tj 1//0 I .- }; 1 4.. '.: 2 4-•g * '~1 't ·· r b. r .· : ·* /14 r £ .- 6 B; el *,rr- · I· r ---*..1-- Jr- -4.4 *4 13 re] 1 · 1, 4 t. 1 f€.1 6.4 2 * 1 - r . 9. 11 . ~# •~~4~0,¥J , 4, . F e . 41 6 #- M.'.~I'....-I. -1/ ¢ 1 9 if -4 7/ A. j n_ZI / / .: I .*-I ':. 77 - - > 4 1 ·. --4.- -4- 1 "1% : 11114 : · -i T 14 1 p I / r P 1~1 * ---*L~~ L"p *- -AE-'- lt'-0 --3/ 1 . 1 1 1 + i -r. rE / ; A-7 MIl i -1. , 14,16 4* 1 p J 6 + .--r···-I'$/$.*Irl. 3 4. - 3 1, ...r 1442.+-2 9972>'.,r 1 1 . 5 + 6/ Mitit, • .2 10:1212% £ 14 ilitil 1T il, 1 ' 4 I'll'.& . r I -·4:.. , 11.1 ./11 4-.,-r ...201) ... .tli?,11 X .*..1,/Id. fUL__462#r*4-**em iturr -+IJAD f ' 4 I..»I *N . ' .1 4. 1 441 ~ driG~*-L,V... 2 91 , 01 :4, •a ..··~It,ABRe:.r &E'v ..... , - 09-5-3:· T .44 ·M...1~ . i,< 4 Lat.?11 . . 4.-9 *S .. .'.'"..... . jili:SE.i#<rit » .t r € € . 43 , lt. 1 .f« C ··· 2*2 4 p i . I• I . i -1>2-4•. ba-4--'·-1 i Yt---A&ktr. 1 It:· 8 Lt ' , I #imf - '*... . .* * */ *f . 82.4,-. - :fil $1 -1.0...1 ... r .- - . # 4. 91 1 25., t ,£':'·'~:~-- 11'.4 j. Dr 1 17 ' t: Ct'~' .j.·UP~fi·'1' /.· ' ~~ .'7~~ i F../ . I £ -1< . -'fz ' f*6 t & l iN . . 1, .be C . . . 1 kie * 4, /5* i 4 , -'. I .. ·r 1:- ..1 . , .4. a J 1 ''. a 0 ": 4- #/ - · "' a --714*kNAA-4 013 -1./t.. ... .. ANEM ' ·4:)9* -·A :1: 2 1 -t:.0.*:.06- 1 -»-444'. 11 £**I--#R 1% 1 -mitu f:/ V k . .' 1--lf-1 ./ 1 2---"**q#"'.*; F /fr..1 1 I ': r ' ./ ./ . :·,0€24 . -/ 4/ ' A-'f ~'04 .4 .4.1. :-/ 3 3 - ft#,4.e-*--~- Iq ---&- p t. b. ~8 :'·5*7, t 9 , ... 1 + ./ ... ,| PERSPECTIVE OF PROPOSED ELEVATION VIEW FROM SOUTH GALENA STREET 01.24.2001 I=l =/11 21"///4' 'IM 2/21 ill ill' 20 *1 /2 [03/ ANDRE'S BUILDING 312 SOUTH GALENA SI ASPEN CO PRADA 0099 1 CORNICE PAINTED DARK GRAY 7 1 RES Ble o0ooo 00000 41 1885 BRICK WALL ASHLAR IN STONE • - ....' ... ./-'. I ./ . I'l.-- ... . . 1 ..... I ... - - -A WINDOWS WITH WOOD FRAME WINDOWS WITH WOOD FRAME ~ ~ 44 PAINTED DARK GRAY PAINTED DARK GRAY ~ ASHLAR IN STONE BELT COURSE PAINTED 4%..««442·~ 2. DARK GRAY 9 1. .wn ... .- ·. 4 BELT COURSE PAINTED DARK GRAY PROPOSED 1/2" THICK "PRADA" SIGNAGE IN ARCHITECTURAL METAL DIL ROBBED FINISH CLAD IN WOOD TRIM MOUNTED ON GLASS TRANSOM STRUCTURAL STEEL TRANSOM 1,-/':.. PAINTED DARK GRAY STRUCTURAL TRANSOM CLAD IN WOOD , 093]L«.977 3 PAINTED DARK GRAY w a 1 b\1 PROPOSED MULLIONS IN ARCHITECTURAL METAL OIL RUBBED FINISH ~ 0« 20 O PROPOSED INTERIOR LIGHT FIXTURE A FOR ILLUMINATION OF WINDOW . 4 STRUCTURAL STEEL COLUMNS DISPLAY IN OIL RUBBED ARCHITECTURAL I . CD CLAD IN WOOD TRIM V. ~ METAL PAINTED DARK GRAY RECESSED ENTRANCE IN - lh,1 WOOD PAINTED DARK GRAY 60 WITH GLASS INSERTS AND PROPOSED ARCHITECTURAL METAL MULLIONS BASE IN WOOD PAINTED DARK GRAY %·en co ... r-- .. STRUCTURAL STEEL COLUMNS ~ PROPOSED DOORS WITH FRAME IN ro CLAD IN WOOD TRIM ARCHITECTURAL METAL OIL RUBBED - PAINTED DARK GRAY FINISH AND GLASS INSERTS €h: BASE IN RED STONE - ~- ~ i~ ..\....43*19:.....43 70 ... 8. 3 '440>*69·«.§44 SIDES IN RED STONE . 1. '. . \+ « 8'-5 1/4" " 8'-10" " 8'-3 1/4" BLOCKS 0 0 4690 9 0 ENTRANCE WITH BRICK FLOOR (-1 STRUCTURAL STEEL COLUMNS - - A,3 CLAD IN WOOD TRIM i \ i PAINTED DARK GRAY i \ PROPOSED ELEVATION WITHOUT AWNINGS / PROPOSED MULLIONS IN PROPOSED ELEVATION, PLAN AND SECTION ON SOUTH GALENA STREET ARCHITECTURAL METAL OIL RUBBED FINISH SCALE 1 /4"=1'-0" 01.24.2001 - -A 9'-1 3/4" 9'-7" 8'-11 3/4" ANDRE'S BUILDING 312 SOUTH GALENA ST. ASPEN CO 28'-3 1/2" PRADA 0099 CORNICE PAINTED DARK GREEN 7 1 ------ ------ .. SRES 8/0 00000 0 00000 0 1885 BRICK WALL ASHLAR IN STONE WINDOWS WITH WOOD FRAME 0 031 031 rEt - WINDOWS WITH WOOD FRAME PAINTED DARK GREEN ~ ------- PAINTED DARK GREEN 4000 1-ip== 11 il'. 11 lk== ASHLAR INSTONE 11 1 I BELT COURSE PAINTED |L__ DARK GREEN Ir . BELT COURSE PAINTED DARK 11 GREEN I| IE = = 11 . 11 11 11 11 11 11 LL== 11 11 TRANSOM AND MULLIONS IN WOOD · e r=====1 PAINTED DARK GREEN - °° 14- 1 0 r=71 9 IMI lei lei FTJ ~-1 0 r--1 r---- I STRUCTURAL STEEL IRANSOM ih 1 -2/4 ~-1 1 PAINTED DARK GREEN n . 1 CLAD IN WOOD TRIM - CN 1 / 0 / 1 4 -- CN 41 4 111 1. \ 1 1 STRUCTURAL STEEL COLUMNS ~ ~· ~ 1 (< RECESSED ENTRANCE IN PAN-1-ED MROK IRR~EN 111 WOOD PAINTED DARK GREEN | 1 1 AND GLASS INSERTS .. 1 1 1 . C\1 /1 111 1 BASE IN WOOD PAINTED DARK GREE -3 ... , /34 k ff ~ f FJ-- \\\ 91 « 0 - Iff IF/111 9 --, 111 1 +20 r 74 - 111 CLAD IN WOOD TRIM STRUCTURAL STEEL COLUMNS ~ ===1 - PAINTED DARK GREEN '. h. / 111 BASE IN RED STONE :4. 111 hi 111 ro -- SIDES IN RED STONE BLOCKS Il' - 8'-5 1/4" d" - 8'-10" 4" 8'-3 1/4" 7---------flf--~ 1 1 1 E 0 0 . 1 M I 1 (o TRES oLD 1 ENTRANCE WITH BRICK FLOOR I 1 1 | -- -- ~" % '7----- A) EXISTING ELEVATION 1 1 4 % \1 1 1 /1 1/ 1 1 EXISTING ELEVATION, PLAN AND SECTION ON SOUTH GALENA STREET STRUCTURAL STEEL COLUMNS # SCALE 1/4"=1'-0" PAINTED DARK GR[MEN -1 --------- < ----------_L A ANDRE'S BUILDING 312 SOUTH GALENA ST. ASPEN CO 22" 9'-1 3/4" 9'-7" 8'-11 3/4" '-2" PRADA 0099 1 1 LL- -- PROPERTY LINE 4r -LIAE 4 Art»Eirr 0 008 0 8 0 0 6 (Al ELOD, 3-1 A w L Ing OP MONIN, tv f BU ib,21 NO, 4 te'-€71 01*T-9 44'*Aa- < Go'. 14' FP,OF t..Ihle --J I .IL...'. . 1 31 -T I L -1 ir- ~.a..•101•.O - 4 f.<6041 ,le--2- 6,52•0·i,4 -2 1 1 . e,7 1 P• ece.·01*+ + -17-*7/227'77-- , 6.·1+It,th,1.7 1 i·· f - 1 1 7~ ..1 49'' 'i . .. ---JAL- '€2/H/-6/1/•49/* £ - .a,irns.<r», tee ¥ 1. Pt"0.1../- Fll #*ew-/1 -A VEKKIT .g 1-3 1. 04* FET'EA 4 -- · -- ·~-·-·-·--· f 1 =~/%'=----- il#'#=Ii y _·_4 _i 51.-2.-,rz•.AU- ,-~._~.w ·~ .- ~-- ,~-~ ~ =47~~1~~~~~~ -r~===·==.rt _=-:1--=r _ - ···. -~ - |5*EL. EE.6.4 i- 811 141 '. 5 4 : a • 1- 1 9% b .1 .11 ~! L RE-r~,5 -r' w . 5 1 r: 2 L.4 - 1 n -4 , AL WkS' ¥-LE-Ln,-ti¥---4. -2-t .1 .. 3.1 ***,H- L./ 11 --I *r...... c.u- ) De -0 4 4u~•,r,-rt :d I M <·H Py,G· r-Il 4*1Wif TS.i tr. 1 ; 1 1 1 d. 1,1 . V V ! ti: 4 2 i A I t.-NE %**A® ~th _t-j i h ~'EN , v 1 0 il _21 3.5 ' p ~ .... - ------1 ,/- F,Cl#-P, 4-TL 104 -149*6 +1«r. Or-B»*La 6*"LIC,•·rr / - ! PULP,re - ./ - . , exjer,4, 4+Yula,HZ -Ok,>44 - 01 1 m<f -T»1. r- Il i,._11~.._!-.--3 - . r==1 - 3 -- )NE,•0 *m·!INBA i 731 + · f . 1 1 O -YE· Ex••00 € 1 LING- Nrm Ap,9 98.4 1 -·. Exier,B ,0-00·0~-2. €·P-YL-10 Mr 1 dFMME. Eerre' 'a"'1'46~, 2 -M J '' 1,0 -O. rvor .... elill . .......re. . UNS -t-* - O' Mfil 2311#321.<Tz,Fil 1 - Pe Mah,49 ele * 41.- IMA,90-'Er f,#ArE T F<ZOF- MATIM 77 ***u*4 11 1 Mer, D J /.12 .51££ PU'. A.18 ./ /Al.f. Iv/ F E,<.»TA ~ 43 NE. MATIA. t>' L.LO -- ·1 ~ / < PrAIN ~4» PPAJ' 4.RFE' ~ ~,~~ /-k..r- 0 .2. Ap \22 - 61' -P€f LJNe --- , -1 6•ME. / 13 1 . - 4 -- 4 -- -6 ~IOn.AL.z 2 1 1 ~ - VEL--,0,-O, - - 22 7-1 1 ' FuNE rege<TAL- ~ F# MOue€ 9.Ar , T. V rf re.4 rA l. :f I I a 1 ¢ 1 - MA>.MOLE --- ---- 1 =1* 45-60- MAIN -~-~ L-__---_1 --- - _ 6- -- ---- '' 610, 6 46 K AL N OT-'ES 5 1. INFILL- ALL t=,~15•'T-&1 OF,GNINIA 1 rENIErle-rION,6 0-1 te OOF et €26-WE-PUL-tv' 19% RE &44.. 1 5x 1/71 bet L.2, N 42 -1 2. €·SE· rtkwi,4 MI 1 M,g- NEA MELH/*[USAL- , L. r4 E 5«6.5 ,6.Aft,f« : -2---r '-JV.A.**fj 312 ¥•* fit.1 South Galena SITE . ROOF PLAN 16 ASPEN DEVELOPMENT CO.. LLC PHILOS International. I.td. 97(*544-4777 . 1 11:111. 1 1, 1 , ~i 1 11 In'.-11 11 1 15 .1 11 1,1 ;31, ft':t, ''jil~F!1:~ I, .ill 11 4 :I,I I.,L,I ~11.1 1 14: ...'f 1 . .- 01-- ..di-*.606.:lii , ':265#, 1 l · 1, i ' ~7»h · - " %, ''t h' '~ W ' El • *-041/.- 1 111 1 1, - 1~ :#11242 l'.- 1 '.I . Mi,¥*,Ze . 2*#1 4 6.i . r . . 4... 4 < r I. L 1+ 41 U - :1 . --1. . . 4 14 - *.(MI'li · . 4 ~11 1:1 0,1 t.. ;: ,~. ~~ ~ ; ~ i? E k. 14111!1!1 0/ .. - ®,11111~ ~14111 1~~I ~~Ig~ ~Ii ~•,I 11a 1 141; ;1 . ~ :11'i~ ! 4 ' .Ir,11 ' - 1,4 - r ./ 11-1'b' 1 *...1@~ Id::Ill- .,t , 1.9'unn, 1~42:. ~ 11'r . J. '01 1 1 1 4'r lilli , sy®; 4 ' ¢24 ' 11™1411 1 - W' , lk, - /1.17.r,1,11:611 .1 1 I .... 30.- • INIM . ij,IM-'ll 11:flm-J- /11': 1 ~1111 1.11, ''11, d .11 .11 1 1111111 1 11, 1 ....m> 0,1 - b t.1¥25 .i 41< IT . 1=#=..11 il" ..2.1 .~~"'·- i#/11111# 1-1 ~.i 'Ir I .11 + '1~1 ~ 2 ·r- 1„ -7. 11 1 1111 -, 11,1,11 ~1 11*1 1 . J 1111. . J 1 ./pl.* i 1 i 1 1 lili / 1 I. '.1 ;1 - 11 lili lili 111 6 q , U. 1 IMRNi .1. 11 1 911 1 , · I. S 1 L. ' 9 1 .-0-11 F A' 2 - j.,2.1 4..1 .1 IAL 1 1- 24, le 1 1 4 . & 1 ' 1 '4 1.,141/I 12.- 3 ak' 0 0 1 j 11 1 n ' F.. 4 1 -11 , 1 lilli -9 1 L ?1 1 1 iIi 1 Illy ;I!111 1 104 ' .- m 1 21.11 - W U all ..1~li0 1 1 1 f. . 1 #*49-1~1 .... . J - 1 ,-24' 1 111;1141*,1 1,11~ 1: b# 11;!11· u ~ PROPOSED "INDUSTRIAL STYLE" ELEVATOR d.3 2 312 South W.- -- Galena -~~3-0l·~~4 ASPEN DEVELOPMENT CO., LLC PHILOS International. Ltd. 970-544-4777 demFF'mi r 4 .1 - 1 1 5233--1~ / NEW WINDOWS IN ORIGINAL OPENINGS (SHADED) *-TE» -- t. 2 1 1 =11. -i 1 1 · .-1 --7- I A - 1 -' - --. 1__ l LU 2-z_ =p L ---- -4 ~ - 6660>457 ,\204 - EL . Hed - r'*' PEE.4 , ELS 4Uzr - _ -8 Cry -- GIL. i~'. ,(-*rr r..77 » 1 9 ~- 0 k .1 - .-1-li- 9 E.6 732~ 2 C./1 1 . 2 2.- 2-2.. - ..0,7-lt D 4 E-.*4.»71).-- 312 -ill V-~~.2,-UI--Z--5 mi m /:/1 ....UNr Soutt Galen: NORT- - ELEVATION 1/\C Il- ASPEN DEVELOPMENT CO„ LLI PHILOS International. Ltd. 970-544-47- TI-Ifff-TRHHPH 11.illl-,dl,1-1,lh i , 1 C---\5 5/ t. LEN-r y B>Li./,ia, <c SHORTEN NEW WINDOW 1 i 1 IN ORIGINAL LOCATION r-7 rf 2.3 ..CCk -< A .E- A-.. I., 9---4.M,NE -.0.* I , Et- 111'-- 1014· - 7 9'©-,7 FLOOf- r O vl. EL icl - I//4 312 -7.0 '· 02:h-' ..0-J-:T 7 South 1 ..1 m : Galena SC - 1TH ELEVATIOI~ PARTIAL ' ' I16 1-N.¥-1 ||~i~ .ASPEN DEVELOPMENT CO., LLC PHILOS International. I.td. 970-544-4777 . - -- Ut . .. REPAINT ALL WOOD & METAL TRIM 1 1 1 1 . 1 -1 -· I ' 1 ! i- i r I -1--,1 tilll,)1' f' 111'1.'' ill 111 f ·k: . ..1. 1 - - V.--¥. · --' »tg. Et> 413%::~th r , 1 1 , It·_9~v O C - C, O 0 <..i.~7 7 0, 0 0 0 1-- .1 1 1056 & 1 -" .- - -- ---a.--int431=141 I l 1-!·' j.1- 6 ~1 1'.T 1 19£14{j-lf :11 1 1 11.1 & 1-L- 1. 1 1 1 i-- .T 1 4 . :J./il !;10 . 11 . . .1 . 1 ' 6 1 . ... 1/1 1 1 1,Iii 1. I.F.'lv-'i»ibrr....L. 11: 111 I J.. 7· ' 1 1 1 +.'- ·, I. Ir 1 .., -1-7-011 ... 1 1 -1 '1 l' I ~,; :' I .- 1,1 I.*-1-·-1.·' 1'1 1. 1 1- 7 -'-1... r · . -1 1 1 lj : 1 , - /5.LI+--- 1 1, I ' 1_1..,- 1. - . 1 -..' ' IL f . L i ! ~ rti. ' i·.f i ~ I. .1 Ctz,1 -1-- ~ u~ - :- 142} 5. 6 3 h EXISTING , - -44 NATURAL . _1_ , 7--c · / .1 .1 L··14 · 0 L.. '2 172-1-1 1.... 1.. c .i 1 1 ·· . 11 ·11- f, j..I--2-171-~re- .1 r , 1 1 1, i i :'.' · t 1 71 f 1 +1 ' A .i - 7.1 --2-Irt. ·.;·.1- rl.- ti~--r+-r= t . 0 . 4 - . L. r 1 --- -I -: C I t f ' / r + O BRICK T--7- . 1 , # · ~ T'r . L . ff,.·..' . i i. r , I i F..3. . . 1 -.1 I, II_.1.' - -1- - ' ' ,-' r 1 - -1 1 1-71·*fr-¥»-~-- A---I ~~=t~~Al~ -7- .T i 0, . ~ ·L'~·.4-,Om , 1 [1 51 L. 2 3 - 2 - F £ h¥ L 2 1-·-1 -=4 N 1 1=--t- 9.4.. !--1' L.. 1. 1~ ·,9.- .h,=- 1--,71-: 64. ..=tt~.5~ 1- :=4.6~:-t·T. t --i ..=PA r-4 4 f .i ~ ~ b· 4 12· ' r4 1 2 .ip·-1 -t-4 24 ;=4 · 144··· B- ......t . ;„.-', ·Fix· r-4 --4-· r~...t . Al· 7'4'·4. ,-w-·( ·-1- f:•zi~ i :r . -- -- 11 11 L -1 plf- 11 11 t I -. r--1 1 i, - -1/1. f. ... A i 4 r--14. L L i 1 . 1 - *4 h. itur· =7 : y--r-4 ..1...f 8, . 1 1 4 b. 1.4 0 . ...f . I 14 -1 3 V.J&~ -, **ii4pjc,.1, f-* -1- i: 1- 41 1:41.?,4, Ii--rj -49 4 -I ... Al,1 I ; 1- . ..LEJ ':- I I . 1 0 WEST ELEVATION - GALENA STREET 4 4 1 1~ 024»*2004:4 J 312 - -,17=1 -1 44 2*£*1 *4 South Galena ASPEN DEVELOPMENT CO., LLC PHILOS International. Ltd. 970-544-4777 - . - , 11~ .=20 14,=tf-1~:-11 f :94,!1.1- . , T-T r / Irft.Wt 2 I W -7-2 2. 1. -%1 i ret> 9 32. :tw'/0,+ f 1 r i 4 1 i jf - . .1 · · · ·1 1~,*2% ··---- - - - 'Er.J :2:=: .2. + * ~-· /·i -L . - e € ..DI - I 1 1.~ 14+ g - >t,·'mrr·02;1,1.-9.Ir.FL: ..THA5VT'im: ..3-'»Au 44' ..:r * : ./ 4, ,#fli~lil; 1-1.-LA EUM ·-93 421 HI * f 1 6..ffs'{ r .51 7 1#5 '- f . E i 0 2 .:J -thi - 01.-- EEK-379Ml-WMI-*OF-1; ,· 4=*Rb--·4- - -- I i-~"" . . .4*' -·srux:*:*...:':Sdlf. ..,. · 7 ..../ kA ·- ~ ill~~rET'-T.,,7- ·_:.--.--'-~ ..- , , ' '.9 i d...1 . - ...... . .1 - 4, #MtiAT=*---/XMT<81*3*· .1~ :; - m -- -- . 1 '/•e¥/r· ",11 11 f .':f ' ' I. :'I ' .4./F ii, 1- . - -4-Rk-i. ...1 '. . ; 11 m.*41 ... - it-L.. _#ff 2 f - :--Tk---I . l4i·:~-:-t„, ··· 3#--n, f- 0-r~~Ck . %if I .. . 1.1 1. .1. f ; i 9 .5-i - .iAdilitalf'ji.11€121 V j- ·· 12 : 9, 1 - . 4.- *. . 1 ---118.--1 , i r : 1 1 m"Uk"'4 * ' d ,: 9,! . T Ta L·]E ~.iof ? . i L. :01-'ty.1 EP- 2 -4 " - - --- . , - --1 l ,, .7 1 1 - . F -4 ~ 3 . ...~,.:.-0 , 1,~ :~t-,3,1 i.,¢=4--f~ ~-· :22 .-2- -·~:. ~::. 9 '*EL-4 ,FT#,m#.#; 1 11:1 liM:Ir- -2- I. :- I . , . .d 1 J 1,4, 9 . I ' 1 .,1 * . -- *'. 1 9.J ..1 1 . 1 1 0'.- . .4 • ? .L•' · - 4 U 9-lk-=f / · 4 0 'll ...":ME*:g"'02:.i.tlm . - - t.2. - - I .... ~EF>£21 LL L 4*0 4.-4.Kil ; ive"*'~,VVP'·' t , 4 - ht ~11 1 J, i . 4-0 \\ »fL .~(tti-„0 .133;isM+AJMUP:lillilli4 --- L _ \ al \ 1/3 Evaluation of the historic character of a commercial storefront might show the following: *4-6-€+ Ill . Cornice i I '1 0 f Upper story -- / \Rn&044 Mid-Belt 41 Comice / 1 - Sign Band *EUOUBLIUUUCULLUUULUILAUL' 46'di.luu¥. a STOKE • ,Transom Display <* Window Recteeed Entry -j t==1~1--1 -1 i Kickplate ~)4/l ILL ir + January 11,2000 Aspen Historic Preservation Commission 130 S. Galena St. Aspen, CO 81611 RE: Attachment 4, Aspen Historic Preservation Commission, Minor Development Review To Whom It May Concern, Applicant: The Aspen Downtown L.L.C. Ownership: John Davis, Gary Nichols, Steven Bellotti, and Mark Haldeman. Property Description: The Andre's Building, located at 312 South Galena Street, in Aspen, Colorado. Legal description is Block 95, Lot K thru Lot M, the North 32' of K & L, and the North 30' ofM. Description of Proposal: Applicant desires to remodel the existing facade of the subject property to include a center entry and elevator at the ground floor level of the structure. Applicant desires to restore the natural brick and red stone facade, and open/restore the original window openings on the north exterior wall and the south exterior wall. Compliance with Review Standards Relevant to the Development: Applicants remodel greatly improves the existing structure. By including a center entry, restoring the natural brick and red stone facade, and restoring the original window openings of the structure, applicant is bringing the structure back to the condition and configuration as it appeared when it was built in 1885. Signed as authorized agent and partner; Mark J ghldeman Z& ilol U L . 3 . 4.- ~-, f··</ / - -- *p -·' ~ --'--ri/-· ' 7-1 't-·12·· :/ .·* · .-t.-7:: ' -I- --7--1 . 1.1.1. 1 lilli'. -Il -, W. t; 9 1 3 4- f . 4 V %. «0. . 15 4 3 2-1,# r ..72 L - #~i Y: f li P . - t - £ .E /-. r .11rig6-·UL . i . I I #·; i L. *4 ..r 10.t·:· ::· --Y--00,1 Ofsc~~--2441Ff~ L:ji::--44 1 2( Ir 1 1¥ #i ·· · i IP#~>- - c- Z.. .,4.--1. 1 -2-'r-O--_.Jr-/MJ -.- 1 1 24:ibvv;41 -t 1j l: 9/ 1-T -'---' * ' ini:--'.?:.:: Et : t m 16 r,1 .- - 1 10-3;- - 12#.4.5. difyl/:1 61.!#.;:37-=-1. .. . ....,2....+Ir:=:6.-4,17- 4i6/7. =.~2:142 ~ U;Wi!44,=Ed//iMMR -¥2*-Ft-t···· - „ *'17'F,1 1 11- 7?;ti~z--i... 91 g-I:t:.-~134&~· '- -t,Flmis a - H . 1== ..: 111/ .L,-1 1 ./IUM-4. ~ t€ r T'/ . ," · ~ h 94( 4 '--- : '<-73£7 - 1- 1 - rm: -- 19 !1 -7. -- W 11.:: 1 .: =-2 :r: ift& m'! ~~,,* iii ·t . , 1.14 1 1~ 41 23:~ily,f' 1- - 17-44 ~~.... £40- -11,1 , .-I + -.h ft . *. /4-:1'155~1£151£/3~.GLM/Z. - I - a -- -i,:.-7-/'-IMMWA. ..:'-'.' · ·· , , id. · d:h .. Irg , .- U. 4 . : ' 1--I I .m.-8.-~ -9.""//////61"/41~,~ · - ·;6 $ 0~11&&1/0/4 -7/6-16 - rr) :6,_ Li-flurgi' . *. -2 --' .... :.ttiNCI =7. I/ ., 1 , .:till 1- J.. 1 i,r 1 - -- 2'~ ~ - ...·4 61- a:~WJ:•-./.-I.I . I I .f¥* . ........ 144 ....el ': 4/AA/UU"/b//4/Im#4470?Fr~7~-f~3rf,cip**-- 3*L -1-1,1,141 48 .. ' f,rt':.~ · '·'-re ifi,l.'.,Allill'irli .la ·3· :*4 4 · . € I : 1 | 1. r-- . :11.1 1. .4.-2& '....'.1.-7 1 · -1.. . · · . ; 1// f: 1,4~,,4 · ~ ' i . '·- i , ' ~1 ' ..: I .. r 9 4 ,. i,:441~t~flim#162.:2:,i.:rf;Na·:9-,.~: 31+,A:.~,Sjfim ·:~':. . 2 41 'g..1 i.... % .- 2=%:9./""/'/W r.3 -~1=:f.: I · :··L. ...f~··.1:i·in-'3? 4"V##4.. . 41# ./·:,-:nuls'£ FrON·:.=: 3:74-(:-1,7/4// -W„4 ,~ ~ 1 . - . .. .... 11%33,78*IN-1 0 L. ... - 'p JIJ~#* f-: - '1 ~11-if j~~ . 6 11, 1 , :.1: -, - ~ mirr·MP -1 -· 9. . 2 · -11. ... %9 1.,1 - :.4.ty.#... t.-r; 2CF,.0,44 31 1,?t ,~1 .,• i. :. 2 •= /5 . 'i.29*d 8.1 I. •' I il , . 324 1 t. <-ak-*~J L.,5 ~R .~1: 3-~ 1 1 1 1 I '' . . C. .. 45't,J,T; . 'i. r - i. r 1 -W . 1 ..1 4.. - - - 1 -! =,Atill-:-- Mil,¥44~2.~t: .41-4 Qlimi .- I .%( ./ 4. ... ~ ' 6'i <*AA:1 f -<~~4** P? ..-- 'a 'Im--EfJfar,t.~:di,El.. : -mt,·· :ellillilliii ..Ilij//ilili"IM-,d, T - 7Trw ~65""i ·~13 , £ p 1 i. : 4,1.a. 1 - ' 1 . ..... 1. 1 . 4 . 1 , 1.. .."61 A . ··.-4 Der f.. A.k ··P .0 Al ..4 0%' 2 m# 71 11 .1 1 1 1966 4 9. '.,er.*77~- 1 "~,%%- --0.fs,h'. ..~ 4 . 1- .0 - --~', 30-al . i -1/VI 5- - . 46.. ./ 1 1. ./.148=. ~ 4€ 1- 1 - 1 , -- 6 22?~Imw- - Lt... 22 & 7 rr: -r r=-1 2 i. ' i.2. ~-:-71 :.01 ., 4 / 7% i *2461,.9- 1. - I. 11 -9*//RE; ilillilill 'VI # . 1.44 .· - 75 - ·T - G 1 1 =P . I r 661 6 £4-- E- 1-•r , : tirrtt. />NA,/ A-I 9- - 44 t.c=-C, - - 4 2-- .9,11--iEL-=t,@t'*a*In-~M *- t i - -, - 3*? --- - -=7= 22 -U ¥ a .%.. . t. '44 . I ... 0- ' '72 - 1 , .A ATTACHMENT 1 LAND USE APPLICATION FORM 1. Project name The Andre's Building 2. Project location 312 S. Galena St., Aspen, CO 81611 Block 95, Lot K thru M, North 32' of K & L, North 30' of M. (indicate street address, lot and block number or metes and bounds description) 3. Present zoning CC 4. Lot size 2820 sqft. 5. Applicant's name, address and phone number Aspen Downtown, L.L.C. 312 S. Galena St., Aspen, CO 81611 (970) 925-2865 6. Representative's name, address, and phone number Mark Haldeman 1377 Snowbunny Ln., Aspen, CO 81611 (970) 379-3372 7. Type of application (check all that apply): Conditional Use Conceptual SPA Conceptual HPC Special Review Final SPA Final HPC 8040 Greenline Conceptual PUD x Minor HPC Stream Margin Final PUD Relocation HPC Subdivision TexUMap Amend. Historic Landmark GMQS allotment GMQS exemption Demo/Partial Demo View Plane Condominiumization Design Review Lot Split/Lot Line Appeal Committee Adjustment 8. Description of existing uses (number and type of existing structures, approximate sq. ft., number Of bedrooms, any previous approvals granted to the property) Commercial Hiqtnrirbililrling (7 story) consisting of LJ • approximately 10.300sqft. of retail/restaurant space. basement-2,800sqft. ground floor & mezzanine-4,700sqft. second floor-2,800sqft. 9. Description ofdevelopment application Restore front facade to historic center entry and restore natural brick and red stone. Open/restore orginal window openings on north and south facade. 10. Have you completed and attached the following? x Attachment 1- Land use application form x Attachment 2- Dimensional requirements form X Response to Attachment 3 X Response to Attachment 4 llllllll ATTACHMENT 2 DIMENSIONAL REQUIREMENTS FORM Applicant: A Apen n n wn town, L.L. C. Address: 312 S. Galena St., Aspen, CO 81611 Zone district: CC Lot size: 2820 sqft. approximately 90x30 Existing FAR: - Allowable FAR: 1.5-1 = 4.230saft. Proposed FAR: Maintain existing Existing net leasable (commercial): Approximately 9,300 Proposed net leasable (commercial): Maintain existing Existing % of site coverage: 100% Proposed % of site coverage: 100% Existing % of open space: 0% Proposed % of open space: 0% Existing maximum height: Principal bldg: 38.5' Accesorv bldg: Proposed max. height: Principal bldq: 38.5' Accessory bldg: Proposed % of demolition: Less than 5% Existing number of bedrooms: Proposed number of bedrooms: Existing on-site parking spaces: On-site parking spaces required: Setbacks Existing: N/A Minimum required: Proposed: Front: Front: Front: Rear: Rear: Rear: Combined Combined Combined FronUrear: FronUrear: Fronurear Side: Side: Side: Side: Side: Side: Combined Combined Combined Sides: Sides: Sides: Existing nonconformities or encroachments: Adjacent building to south encroaches onto this property bv aproximately 1'6" Variations requested: NONE. (HPC has the ability to vary the following requirements: setbacks, distance between buildings, FAR bonus of up to 500 sq.ft., site coverage variance up to 5°/0, height variations underthe cottage infill program, parking waivers for residential uses in the R-6, R-15, RMF, CC, and O zone districts) , tjA*t~~~~~i~ I 1 'Plu tue ARB'W-·.- - „ , . "gvul#20 A'<5129492WK+U#-4<3 - &779,aft --1. 1Av, Star Adventures Je,p & Stink Tours i ~ Call 544-4700 - -..*- 2 4.6 . 1 A . / - AFTH AVE- CONDOMINIUMS -- - THE ~ 4 J N;Pal , 4 MINIUMS / HAUS & 6 - CONDO FASCH;NG AJAX CONDOMINIUMS , ./ O 0 * / r-< J GALINA PL~GE -/CONDOWNIUMS ALPS i 4 J / ups.auCK . . , CONDOMINIUM ® S== Lillt Nell I . - - QUAD CHA]R , THE LATLE NELL Thi 1.Ilan Civiar / THE GRAND ASPEN HOTEL Tippler < 3 -Me-urant.Baratihout.1.1:&~ r-I=----,--N-=-r--e lom©., REsom ,€Ef 06*V.n 'a=akal= - ~~ 11 liPPLE INN Maxnekh 1- a Glille Asp- Sport. j~ bg7~Mia~em~mm~ Jll- NORTH OF NELL CONDOMINIUMS ~~ , DEAN 1 9 --1 ~ NORTHOP NEU 6.-* -1 -Iot..7 Ir•r=Fir¥-1-rrmv, DIC- 1.".r......11.141 .9.1·.-1.- M:is *:1294 > 4 Asp// Book Sl- OUR s., 9.00 203'ui,jol!'111.mmt,Gl; 11-4'I,m.7ND,11,1.4,·r,~j-·_ High Society theth- Ablcin CHATEAU-- Cl--w C.1-, a - .- CHAUMC»fr DUMONr CorT- 1 st. Limot"- i Ski Service Center/ 375-2118 J CD - AJAX MIN. BLDC 1 Board We,k, P-ches - Aegah•/ Ross Andre·.vs/Delgner' Stefan Kaelln PR 'or Men Fir- Jewelry | Pro Shop - Pom'roy Sports ~~rtles 01 411„1 H=-on Spoll, DAE Sio-oard Shop |--1,~1~.1-1 kb DURANT MALL arrh Hair . Jaa, Boyce Ltd. FII Jewebry Cafe Ink.~~ [~L.ld l.g....~ * lillilmililial 02 ..m optIC:41 Options 11'*Ii'UN (ups"rs) ~ 925+..4 0 -..- 4* ~"e= F~M~~/652~aBW"M"mi'#|~~. L - 1641/19,/PU,/ RH~· Sucher. ASPEN SQUARE CONDOM*NUM HOTEL- ASPEN GROVE MALL East End Thi G,-1 Block 01 A,Pen /1.--4~L-ee> p-- _U==*=W Lis,1. 42 Ase-, G/ov, FI,e Arta i o /74* Gourmet -1,9/1, Doucatissin Greg Shop ®8 Sid i Dt,vam SL Vid/0 ~ST-imm7 SQUARE . ~ - Guldoh Restaur- 10*Ils EIMBED & BREAKFAS,1 .(aDove< 1 9-1-. -1 E - 10 0 ge•Bu •_ill::~~FElll=li ~ Cityl".kmt 85 ME_c- = ~11 ~h,ArtofOpehB I~Z=Z..'-CS,7~An :~. 1&2 -i£1...Ft Avale.~ McDonough' Ski Shop - - S-s M,morablti --E=- - - - ' 21· ··;,CTT'~mwl•ry 1~ cOOPER AVE. MALL' 1 E. COOPER AVE. HUNTER MAZA Sethrnek,-REALTOFIS. Inc. PI-re/Famil» 0 6 2.- . Th ..9 6.m GDO.ly ~1 1 Jolm Atinci~ Closalc and Asp- Art Suppq Cooper S,/.•t Fly,~&** HomijiI. 00,ion D,signer Jewel,v Rar• 4,,.yy L./9 Frame tt Bar & R=ta,rant ,&8066&1: jaanary inAl•11111,1,, A--1„ CHATEAU ASPEN 80 )gi- Dhi.• .//Vpam *P Spc»•t•. I. Johnny , il 1 1 M"zak,r" Gateria .....an -I'.f--- , 0-uen • Lucei'* Ital•an Pa,adis, Bak•ly ....=WIm~-rij#80..co, ........... I "'1 M'Oule b dalkil' 1 -na Dellcatessen C~, -1- -Ilt,==1 -8 FT--~IMMI"MIGk,irili25 11 mmil-al=-1[n h¥28 ) mijp Blu. Mai. --1rriliT",of#.. 0(-29..Ir:5*-EM;lie:/ rilliBI=nf°'-/. SQUARE ® LI-* Daniell. 4 1 ~ 4 Dargeis & CE;Czl New York Pizza MIS-1/s Pub ,s- UTEcrry 8£00. -11Shep all, & Bao EGmERM.E*;111;MuLBmick P"1 - em~Imm~g~~~.0~ Leslie Edwards Hu,tsman Galle,y Littio W~,d Ah,e,-43' Ane Jewele,s L'Equlpe Th. lock/ Art Sou,co Asp- 1 --ResWurant -Rich Wagar-He~onfKorn -0/ Fine Art. LIt- An//'9 -Gallery - Ute - - Factor¥-CAIP,onk-In-national- Associates, LLC and Cornpany El#.g city Cheeki Ungede ~ Outlet . Kitchen ................. Realt{]05 Club Chats- ; S.rra Shirt Bar 8 41 M O 63 50 45 1,5 2-2 40 Grill E. HYMAN AVE. HYMAN AVE. MALL rx Mont"ito r=-4,/OG.,r~.1,4, M V m factic & Sports O,thopedics Real Estate | Rlslor=,te | Syzyg, Mason & Morse 10 Horne Furnt,Nng•/ **EM&<-Er/t:f.q,ktaki .pen Athiltic Club LA. 3*00 Shabby Chic Ampen Fine Art •-z yedia BNK~~~ M»anda Ga»ema • My 1.lane MaIF#* L'Hostnia World„ilie ~~~ |'0"n. Pm[,r Ca Bank} L'I""an"~g c.- tl2-®""~~~~~omts o,tes. Reid, & Waldron ta - Prope,ty D,bnag-nint sandyb 01,1,;~EZE!1€~~;;-~Rug Imp7 7.Rony, 4,:. *a~-9.@ t;§ Sha=~ 1 'Cooking School Aouston & 01#ary • Fe ' gi--tney C) sus#L# on u,e ue,l(iD Lori B. Alpe,1 1 Im/~=267E= 11 E / GAP / GAP Kids 0161-===e- 6iilial,Fil,W Lb.- '- 8211;Zmijgfrisillif*Bulsilil)<3 Louis Vultton/ Designs & Nve I Dewitt i Ud. - Okla Towne *tique= Fm,=-1 Salon ,-- & Fine Art Intarnational Chist,an Bar Boutique E. HOPKINS AVE. = CO Ze~e Aspe~ Fire 4spe. Cuy H,»8 Espiesso Vol & A/ce Bi Ae 1, 713//~ Salon 1.10.1.1 Te*acllhe Aspen Store ~~22,k~ F#W91 Accommodalions ~Ef---bl r--1 '=m=.tm,=11 Nno -WAr 244<114%7 9..r/,3-,-' *¥.El• The Phol» PRace Fartana 1- 1 Hou, Photo . Vah Vinh //~ Stage 3 Theatre U Mary'$ Cburrb Cleaner-E=press Aestawant 1 my.,1 . 500'. . / 1 REPAINT ALL WOOD 1 & METAL TRIM 1 1 el I. FI j.jj.i~· Hyl~EPTZ# 1, f . .1 fl:1.1: 111 1 1,11 i . 1 ---- rLE>4L ~ ~ , 7 f. 6 5 84,6%:b -I..,r- , 1 11, - ·r' 0 6 0 0 0 k,I-4-AH S lifjrT' A 0000 - es· 4 -ai I r lB©6 . Ir=+1.177 1 . , , 11 1 1 1 1 1.1 /1 11 r-lI1Jln-n-21.1-1.J-7.f-Z.J-7-/-1./--1.Tl./-1.rUl/-1.r7.J-LrU-U-Lrt-rU-W-Cjl~W-Utr» ' tz : E k·*41 -; !~ b-< !111 , 1 -r! ~ ~f*.,4 i.~iI~--~i j~~- ~r -r ' Fl-- 1--1--1-:~71 p..1.-rF.'T-KTIOT.7.r,J?-0~1Ttilmj-4.:{!7...1 'Ilit{.*t.31ri.Trf, .'. .nfl. ~ I -0..Ill:~T 'I-j- ~:11: 1 -22- l 1 1 1, IiI 1, a lilli, 1 1 lili 4 3-j . :r .1.. ; -1- 3'' '~1 h/ 'bil,1.1 3=Liz .; 1' 1 -f 1 1 ; ,10 ..... . .. 1;' E.J,!.~9'..~C:.,r. ,1·.,~ .11.1..C. ~' 1..~.~ f.==PI 1 . . 1 , 1 - 1 1 1 I al, t"h '' --7 - I 1.4 ' M i : -1 1 -:- -2-- - » k' ~.ft- ILLJ- 2,6~.,lil RESTORE -1 r----, /. - ' ; 1-1. , 1. 1.-- - i -- 1%~Lb R EXISTING , f ~ · , 1 .#. &9 ---2 r i . 9 .. ..6/. Er - c 1,r NATURAL I '- '.3. 11, 4 BRICK ... 1 1. · ..:I ,1 3/ 131 %. .£/ . 1 11 ,· I ' . , - - . *--r? . - di ZE ...S..I ' ~. L--6.--~~'l'.-, r ' h .- Ibl,- 1 1 1- .1 | 1 Fft ~. 1 1 -- . . .1 .1- i. i' .1-/. - ' ~ 1/'Ti.1. '71 - ...'-J. .:.. J. .4-: Lf·i · 554.4*bi-r·i:;-jit:.:,i~.I:. <4 -·1 ~t. ' , I. J. 1 2 'It R 1 -3-3. ........4-:Si. . -1- 1 71.1./7-74 1[ I r ·17 1 r 1 . - I. , '.i,-'.-2 1~€-·T• .......21.--*i C.rn ,:r,#,•.*, 0 0 71 ·-0.'-*.. ~... - ·-· ..1-,rn.·;...i..·82 ' 1 MOIC 1 P i »d· L.u L-, I.-4 -6.t E. :1 t=.-t LA 1- 1 L 143.1 u u Ht - 1 21 N.i k. 1· t.4 r,i 1 2 12·-1 44 -19.4 44~·14··· id- 4.4· k-i k.(+4 *b W:~:,:1&,1.-.44 4144 04.~ 4 2 79't'FT. 1 - 1. -- I , . 1.77. ----7 --- 1 *-./.*-----.==ZE'IT=11=77777733.,·- :.-Aty-4 1 11; 1 1 11 1 -i--- . -- 01 A .. 1 11 01 ~----------- -- ... - 1 - 1 - . 3.2 ¢,A' .h, 1-: 1-~r,~1 34 , 1 ,/-1 R *Cr' . 4 k J :1 4. . . 1 „tj....Ma . - I --' t. ·r···*b-k~ L» A< , -7. + 7 . . 1 ,; tnA L , N ",..,. ·r.. r N.*. 21 l 3. * -/ .' ~· -94/.- k.1, .kt. - 1-2 9.i 4 _ A ' . . . 1 WEST ELEVATION - GALENA STREET + 312 ~21.-4./1 i i. *-1 ir< South ---„M Galena ASPEN DEVELOPMENT CO,, LLC PHILOS International. Ltd. 970-544.4777 LA-/-/1 6-1 *H Ul,Nij!{4 / 11~~ 4 -4~- l-~14- --.-.-Tr ~'-7 4-{[r' 1 - PROPERTY LINE ~.~·-----VA€ 4 Mih-»tr 9 0 8 9 9 0 8 00 6 (Al 151.0 6, x L riE ds¥- Atz,OINNO C Do\UP.U 1 l %O'- f---- - -2429 -*REW-$'' GO'-g-i- f'eF' l.1,·le<-J r- r Pu l - u I _ ' --- - -~ 1 1,90,2,-ta>- wpING, -2 - 1 1 ; 1 O ' 4*4*6*- E>£:*Te ------I--/.-I-©O 11 ,®MALY ' n/ 1 1 1 1 1 gult - L.-1 1 - A-_ I J 45/ . -- --1 EL-a£..El#/4.4 15.VNE. LE-4.4 - 11 -- ' i . 0-3-1 CE)-4 . 1 [b J 1 - 1 . b,.1 k E . , i * 1 4 4- 0 4 Cn 11 k | truq _ 1 All 4..' 1 - 1 1 i 01. f K 1 v V L L- 9 4, 4 . ~5 1 1 1 5. - er _ke i ~ 'Al E Of; 4,0.11£ ~ 23 |· i k L,NE OT R_t<».r -- 2*-21-5 621 1 -3*7~ - - 11 f 4 1 E € -= 1 1 EV/LPMCD -..5 .--- (F) z, ·· + 9~7- 4 7.0 1 t i i €F-TL |OPrE -:NOF·<6 ~ <Mier# or·v/.••DLE €4#fl \UXT ~ -- ., 1 . exlene C»Yl-INHT -T-,4•,&14 - , : i -- E-Xle,19.9-Es#.4.*L-8 ap-YL-1- Hr Sky-O' nor. ---.-- --. - 9 r=-71 ,-ViA#0,43 MA-rE T UNS A 1: ' Il I ./ / p*·. TU r.:if 1 1-ING < PeNN -7.-T 1\/11 1 i \92 -5*7 .ACI. UNE.-~ L 1,· r:,er,EL·OW . h -4 w. -ac~-ET , h + ft - - - ~ ----- - (*AW,VALA -9 7 -- , A:€ 11\--- TE~ M 1 ' 4 - val-·,~W'-o· ~1 ~ PH.1 WE. rE ac<r.t- 0 F + HA'*E :2'At·~ ' ~pre eup. ---m, T·v rere.Ir,14 . 02 Exle'Tly -. _ 1 - MANHOLE -- ~-- ---- - E* 1.,r 'D 6/Wes- rIAIN - - SKIAT-4, Dull-PING' h ' wfle· 2 312 , 9 9219* 1 b fePY/n~t7f'793 1 Pot 41*i,4 South Galena SITE 1 ROOF PLAN J/16 - lillit ASPEN DEVELOPMENT CO., LLC PHILOS International. Ltd. 970-544-4777 ALLEY i : 1 . T.,i ' T- EXISTING WINDOW J • 1. 1 0 . 1 . ' 1 , - DISPLAY WINDOWS LEASE SPACE . NEW GLASS VICTORIAN ELEVATOR - ·~ · 3. . NEW CENTRAL ENTRY i : 2 . LEASE LINE ~l --.- - . - r,r. 1 1 DISPLAY WINDOWS LEASE SPACE 1 . 1 . - ~ a#«he i 312 C. f 1 Fly **t *79 South Galena PROPOSED FRONT ENTRY PLAN A 4 Elit' ~Mi ASPEN DEVELOPMENT CO., LLC PHILOS International. Ltd. 970-544-4777 UALtl,IA b I Met I . . 1 ALLEY 1 · 11 1. EXISTING WINDOW --1 1· 1 . , 1- . DISPLAY WINDOWS LEASE SPACE NEW GLASS VICTORIAN ELEVATOR -: , I U ,Ul . . 1 4 1. . -·4·0 £10 . ** - % 4 . NEW CENTRAL EN-!1* r ~ ; 1 Itt I -- LEASE LINE illl 0 --2 - 9 92<L¥ 1 k - 1/ - 1 - DISPLAY WINDOWS LEASE SPACE . - 4 1 4., li. : :*99 312 1 South 1 6.- 9.-lip -i 'Iall Galena 1 PROPOSED FRONT ENTRY PLAN B A .15!~ i~|~~|~[~~|1_ ASPEN DEVIIOPMENT CO., LLC P lili.OS International. 1. d. 970-544-4777 GALENA STREET A i L Ul:. 11. .. Iii .'111 k 'IF 11 -6-1 "4 "ed I h !; 1 5 + 4, I~ f -r.1': 11'4, 1 '11~111,11 11 1 1 . 1 1 Ill'. .1 .1 11 9/ E 1 1.1 i., , 1 f. lili 14 1 '46@ 2=z- :) f..AL . ; :'24*:4*, I'll|| b, I . 9 r . .1 3 ;ili? fte L 1 1 -9 1 - 40*. / ..1 1.-4-22 1 L 1'. 11~1 - 1 --0.1, 21- 1- - IL : -(11. jiIA -111 lili- - - 4 7' +4- AIL- - : i., 1, lilil. 1. 1110.14 1 1 ; , : 1 flil.,11 r -- 1 0ik ' 11: '.,:i .;135„ +E -1- .IT:>¢.. p 1 . I 1 ~11'Im!111,1,1 »qi- 1 11 ~1 lilli 411 1 - I .' 4, ' p . .9 F 1 -11 - -,1 - '11 1 - - 1 -1 11 i' . t , 1 1 4 a , J, 91 r ...1 -11 . , 1 1 m 41 1 mil- r .. Ati~ j lim 10 - a I lit 11 9. ib~ R - / - I '3 1 m ,:Ii]&, I~ ~fa 11111.11% 12 It. 1 , i , 4.- /:L' ; 11 i 5 · t; f- ' . 1,1 h. 1 ? 1 'k 10 I I ril 4 - li Iii 01, '11 44%1111'd'. 111 ~Pr ~~lfllt il-,1 ..91, 1* F I. '··44 , -1 E#51*.'' mil~"~,fi'- "* - - 1,·' Al-241-0 4 - I, i 41 I i .1, 6 4 -41 , | %: 2** . m 1 ,: · - 11, .11&111.11.1.11/ 1.1 1111 .r 1 1 1 9 'In ( -=.-~ 1.... - '7p~' I ' 4," : PROPOSED "INDUSTRIAL STYLE" ELEVATOR 0 .. v. i=-_ 1 312 Nt i,it.4 South 1,11,1 Galena L.f~#v,&I,~11I ASPEN DEVELOPMENT CO., LLC PHILOS International. Ltd. 970-544-4777 1111* ' L f 639 .r 1 11 1 1 1, i rT-4 NEW WINDOWS IN rr ---1-1 ORIGINAL OPENINGS (SHADED) u O - f·• 1 - 1 1 1 1 1 i It 1 11 , 1 1~ 1-1 1 .1 -1 1 t : F 71'1 1 1 1 -: 1.1 1-1 11 1 1 1 1 4 1 i 4.4 | 8 1 l 1 I 1 /\T r - - - -V . €,E.Cate FLOO, --r-- 6 - EL . 110' - ¢*• 1 . 1 EXISTING WINDOW -- ,4,1 L.1 OPENINGS 1 -f- MEZ·OAN,he EL. 14'-10'4' /9 1 . ·h 1 - -- -- 1 - 4 1 , 11 Ir _ 4 - 1 - - P £91- 2- 257.1- - -- -- -1 1 lilli -111 - - - .... -~ - E. 701 - O/4 .... . .r, A V ' 4 /.----9 9 :»42 9 1 %24*RELP=21/ 20/1 /'/-0/*-M:..:.I:- I- * 312 ****4 South '4*1*41 Galena NORTH ELEVATION 1 i•~U4RR~~1: ASPEN DEVELOPMENT CO., LLC PHILOS International. Ltd. 970-544-4777 42+ .. 1 , glb.AvE<- 4/n» £/ A-1-0 .4 1< SHORTEN NEW WINDOW elr IN ORIGINAL LOCATION 2.- ' I-/*·'11·0 v. .AN .,4 1 - -i 't V&//IN,f/ 7 (-Y~ EL. 1110 - 1024• "-47 FLOOF T O W. r- EL 1022 · 10/4 ~UL.' u . 2 -+ <. d 312 -ul.-~ 4.--6©-/- I-- - til 3-0.-1 South J.1.dill* Galena SOUTH ELEVATION - PARTIAL '<16' ' 1 ASPEN DEVELOPMENT CO.. LLC ////6....//// PHILOS International. Ltd. 970-544-4777 -- -- 1,7 ' ' 15'U rn ,li i, L 1.111 11,i b 1 74 5 -_A ~1 11 lili lili lili '11 1 ~-Nran-StrlrurAT.7276trrx- i - , --1 1 -/ lit I i. h - T li 1 C., BAT 20'-104• 1 --- r ' 6-12: A<64 LJ - -- --- - 1-~ .1 1 ~ 1 1 1 1 1 - 11 11 1 1 J. i ' 1 / 4-- 1 -f. I \ I. 1 . , tti . -)64'4' 4 .1 5 , i ' t 1-. 9 1 -- -- -- 4-- - ., --1 . 1 ' 1 --- ~ »- - - \¥- I .11 /'f 4.-3-9 1 1 --- - 1 5/8* INSULATINA -7-EMP. OLAts - --. / l/1 i 1/ 1/ 1 ~. 1 1. 11 11 k 4 f /4 1 214- 1-' tf'-1231 Jl U .1 B' 1 il 12 4 \ 11 Nf 0 -1 4 ~L- 4 L-2 4 I ,4-1 T-ti 1-1- i 21· i 0 1/. .1 - . E L . I 11 1 11 'I .l- - -- Ill--i- . , I -- -------- - f{__921 /02 1 /0 44 1 -1 , 4 4 L. \- r - CCE= 24. - 4 1" EXT. CEMENT PLASTER ON EELF FURRWA QALU LATH r \ ATTACHED H/d¢ 4AL¥ ROOF/N# NA/L 5 3 G'06. -t . .0 43» MBO flo 1,4 /1/&&% . Ald LL, 4 EE A/G-67 ELE_VATION si*LE W, tioN R,1*4• .-lill-"I...il- 0 1 1 41ER -- -J .... I -- I. . . 1 . 'i . i t, · 1 1, 114 . 1 --- 0 - 0 - -- -- - ' t. 1 ' . 8. - I - , 1 1 1. 11 ~ - - -- • . . 1 , 4----- 1 .... . '1 Ji 1 1 0 - 1 t .. 1 1 R: 1 , . 1 r % l ... , , 9 t. D it 4 l u -E:- 64&.tle -- 11, 2 . - 4. . . .- 1"6..1.-1,114 4 - f ..p- *.0 'I . ·. .1 . i 4:je, 4 .. ' : VJ. ·. ./. t . -/ /7 I 1 4 ..4% 4. .,4 . . . EL~Allo l~- tD ./ 1 , j. . - I, 79,%#MZ'», - I ie. ' ·-4,9 *~vt- 1- ' 1 ' k · a · .2' .2 - # i. i 1 4 I b )-=9' ·113 t 1-0&B 1 ' 1.· ' 1? '4.Sff:.- p 'Ij -. r.4 , A / / 94% /1~. ... 0 _ -'N-2 -GLE_VATI ON -1-1.4 . , . -1,19,122: '.1.-2... r 01 L' 1 v '•.-IM .v, 1-€.4-ir > f 36(ALE PWO*TO ;tzai<*:,5.JmWiq~4~4~.4.<.~fi,92..pk~Ib CO~A "'S ~ - - 1,41 ...4,40*.·f,rp'·E·'A:~·40·¢:..i 1~1~~~pti?~'t'.2(1 42, . 0 -1¥t; j 1-'14 *44 fte~*Eft,j.t<.f~,1,03itj~-.921 4 0, 1 7 11 ''WU, St 9. 4.,,.:5714* 9 ' ' ' ' *' R:4 4 ' . " ,-: sj~-~,5 -43:,I.....4,*,pi'2464=&:„d,:24*·'4' ~A.~..~#.,f 4212~f>.r·:11, 46<4·~42.44:'·0.-0~.0 4*4- Ti:'.~. , 1 *ff<*- **:*%.mig>;WA--i«~,i·-j.42¢rit¥¢-~lt-:~kilt-;- ~140*~~::ki~?;i··- &~bgipt·67*73 - -:9-- 3 / th:. 1~f~~~ '*. I··2·2~.6~f·'.~1%~.*B$.~4£,4, 4:~8.;·1 -f<-0.~4~W~V j~Sh&04<<3*1*,,:Li;-:~:ti?9··7€k.4 ·.· * *.t )5·.:.u.i, i '.· ·t·····-·.·¥IT'· 6.1 ·~·,;w~' 45.4-f' 3;44i.'f~-'·jd5'21>*;**·~IN..-2ge'?t'~fl,i.·i-~ uj24~3426;4.-·, .Pz.I; . 13.4.' E.:4.ditiLATZMWidialturw,07*39'9#f.'·~.'~0,i - win.I'Eti~...t~ 1~~~- b' 8. Jer=a///*arlfl=. v...97,4.-3.2- -6.1 //1.._i--01~ka·CLA' Dul·c ve,ww='1 1//gv'·...Al A• ... ,i #. 'lt '. 1.1 , .-Ill#VI+I' u....I--*...#-I'll..'.. ..'.,r .1 6~ li 1 .. ....a,~PX-& V I £':, 5 . 4, '~,2 ~'~4;~,4"f '~r.,461,4.136N?4~ , 1 laa n . 1, ff. . . 1 ' 0 - M, . f Ot, Vit ' '4 , 519 *i;*W 1, I 9- . A '62-4 · 1 *4 F* · 1 ': r. . 1 1 1 -4 4 I 1 1 11 , It . 94 r . ~ ~~ 4 'i ?g·· 1 1 .1 , 1, 2.7 4 2 , 7 7 ' I 11* .'1'el, J.. . . · 4. 1 15! k;42 45**tffi ,+' i U };a" 0;7434,9 ~.1 j; "16 4~4- ..9 1'.2 4 1 1 . ff. t : f :4 n ,.. C %11 1.11 . 5 1 4 '44 e Tpati tt;22 3 . i P.11.1 0 . 47: , , . ¢1 ; '. 0./.1 4 1 ''! i 14: I I '·iTI„. .ir'.,Al . 4 17 14; L ' 9.4 U . . A '' - 1,1 . -& . A,Z'·e li *Brrti , 4, 4 41)4 ¥':6,-1-:4 %1111 1.1,~~ 0 ¥7·,1. 0 ~· - ~ ~ 4 · 6 4 .' ·fi di,#'P,T. {1!~69* 14949'1 -- . 1/6, 1 i ' 4 ./".1/464*94 ' · r 4 - ¥. '1 12. 44 - rr P i .1 J . g., 1.48 : .=,1.Litti? ~,1tr--1 ' IM.q~34... ~ 0~ ~4yt*;* ~~ it. B:/1 , P . 1 ..1 r. ... , 1, '' ,.,•4#4&. f D J.if", 41.Wk..Al . 1 Itt ... 1 1, /1., 5 1 1, 1 1 I H r 0.-/3.7'-7.-rrl,[...RF-A ~MI S ' j- '111 · 4 13 .- 2 /41»'tk>'y b#144 66-: . 94~,-,wkik %:#i-1.j- 44/ *.8.& I C M . ? 1 t:611 L PL ... i Il 1 . - L 0----hc~6~~ :3 I - 4 \ . / I L 'It /,1 / 1 \6 0 0 , 1 -~~:~~ ~-i ·F---7--IT-'·-4 1 <31, ' - .... 1 1 6 -1 0 C 0 0 1 0-fely»* E #921 . / 9 1 , ' r 0 10 6. Pt,1- !. 0 0 0 .j 2 - 1 +24-11 - lees F-:th · 1 l 1 1, 1 1 , .1 1 1 11 . I --· 11· Wfb ' ·1; r -f-.,4 444.P.R~lw~.b : 1~'~%:·', 6*4-:g'-f---lf-:'. t.4 -1.'-7:464?f43:~i'g. --:E,- I ~rT-r r:n ni-ca=··f-·.T : i,zil:2£33-6--ME-.7-*f..-r 1.1.1,)~: 1 7.1,':Art¢t ' 44.4. 4 1 -' . t. -I- 5 5 1 i:. F f..9.*P'.-;L·J ~) -.1 . ~P '; , i€t~ "'f/-62'12.7·'~$46·:E '5 -: eti~ i-~,44·' 7 -· i. ·· · 'J'".:14·. 1 27 1 -1 1 1 , f . . ,·' ~.·.:- ·~·' . ;I: 1.-4771' 3, -1..1 -·,.t ·· :·1 ··'.2 1--r.:12}¢t . 1 4, r Li r_... ....."-,ILK~Ag ·,~: 1 1 -f .-- --IL~&' ~tre¢!i.E:Ile#15?2~-:LI.~2 I.if-1, i.....6 71·7---I~ I 1 /1, . i 1''I·*1 1 1'.4 3.4. 3 2,1.,f:...5 *.1,4 - ,--il-- -»1*4 r . 71-f/- 4/6:'I.~1: 1· 1,4 ·4 f r , , +4: :',4.4 - ;13 ' , 31 1 =... 1 .:, 7.1, 4%1 , . , , - ~Ir 7 4 4&6 r . 1 .1- I . - £-11 I . Vvt · ~38-4.11.,f?f?Ii.4 rd £ ./ i ~5+4:162(.: 2. ...... 1 11 1 , 1 9-4 ..' r .4 _Li I 'll 4 2026 4 1 , 0 ' 1 lik. ~ ~ 1 ..1 :=r...1 e ·1 / 6 JU · · i / b I . - , . 13·.,/4. , ,. *'i , .1. ?lips'.4 1 54,9...~1,14 - . .L · 4ih t 1'1 / 6 3¢4 '. · 1· K·'·0:*,2 2·u.-2.wmlin_ ~~ - .. -1 lit 7*741:J j ~ , + _ .... 1. ' f ' . 1 r-60·' +1 - 1 1 -2 ,.i....- ' f:. r J T ~~2 ·'p ~ ~ ·4~'£~04 if·-ti .i,hz. ~ if . } 4 9t' I-It E-'J t; 11 ' 1 . 4 . r. - -- -1 · r 0.4 L 1 1 $ & 'I- 4 1. 64€-i.'11. 4 -- J.F. 1 J r f 7 + · . -' - 1 lA . 7--·r_'tdatr-4,01' ' 1:91 - i. 1 1 - , · .I-~ '.;..9.·?2 u.':.0-~..t:*-Milttle'" * '72/'AV.;'; *.*.. L '.1 ...·.'i» .:1 &' 4,. . ' --- I 4 . "j b 1. ··/54 . 1 .. .1 r-7-1 .. ' 1. r -2 H 1- 1 L 4 Al "1 44 i- 1 1 ;4 1] tl-3**4 Al -~~.-471#41 -1-14+ ·t41 :L.<.-Cl:~t~Eu ~a-h 1 F 1 2 1 E ; re. L.1 2-4 ·- *EPT irer · .. 41 41 1 . ... Vic. . / . ,..9*' . "4'41·. i. 0- .-1 , . I.* . 1..,Al¢-lk 4 - . ,*F.:19 1 . 1 1.*ED. I I . , -I m . . -,/ 1% r 4 1 -.91 1 4-litiN --- . 1 i>41- - =b : I. r. r . 'VA f f . .. 'll...2.-11 ~ .r ·14. ' ' ¥4:M \ wer 61 'tr' ;10, 21 ~1~12>2~ ~ L .a P, .- Pr41. 4 1 ' ¥ a 4=4 0 - --- --2 -ula= *47% tr} f 411,1.. 1.... ... --_ LE 00 1 4 » *. -207 *48 1 == 1 4-4 .. ... 17 1 f. .. lif- Li - ~~~ d ' T. - r 1 u, 1 & ' */* , ' Al'·-'·1-i·i,·'$.'i'm<".,1.,·-ill .t•.1 '/. *--*~ _ - j.'JUCEI. 2-2 ~-- 1 •' I , I . 'i ;. I' - I.'., ,i. .' v .04~.1 1~ ' ' r -i• .-.·4 ' . 14/* '.,-'·4 'i.#i v· J-..'.'. . , I k... + &-.'/ re.tr , ·44 ..... 0.- i 1 - WEST ELEVATION - GALENA STREET 4 W./ .... A 312 *56,1 -29/1 q South 1 11 1.9 Galena ...... i ....r/T r.r. ir¥ n.......7/ .... . i n flibi 10 32: J r 1 1 , ALLEY l \.-0/ .. EXISTING WINDOW 1 C : *treL 13*27 . , i f . DISPLAY WINDOWS LEASE SPACE . .. I. I ./ NEW GLASS lEe'-- 2-.,1 -3 - 10 VICTORIAN ELEVATO R ... . 11 . . , - I LEASE LINE - I.I. NEW CENTRAL ENTRY' 46- 1 -2 -- 1 1 --:. 3. I l. I , I . I 1 LEASE SPACE 1 " DISPLAY WINDOWS . '. , 4 I 4 . I . 4 I %. . I 0 . , 1 1 r , 1. '//////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////~ . 1 . , 312 I g~>si i -¥72"X-U",56*@665Aebax,:e.,A. I--r .- *. - 11 44 1 South Galena , PRop8SED FRONT ENTRY PLAN 1 l GALENA STREET , 4 . ,. , r · i . --. 2 . - 112 1 1 .1 I- ./.1 1 1 / , 1 - 3323ally 1 -- NEW WINDOWS IN ORIGINAL OPENINGS (SHADED) - - 5 4 1 .. 2 4 CL 1 .. i --1 - --1 1 k ---2 522223 --- • 44.u,-e, .,cs* 4 GL -1 -1 -E-- 2 << =L , h i " 4--7,·/757 1 1 j 1- -J b. I -1.-1-~ In--. I - r - -0 6- C==1 = 1 1 -- W & r j -- -- 0 i B 1 . 4 -1 L--_, f . r rh- -- N ·-: - r-1 0 - :.'- --'r. 66 'll- CM I lilli - =-1 · Lt 4 --- il----I . . 1 9 (54,4 4 624-6.-5 - - 312 .... Soutll Galena NORTH ELEVATION 1 /.1 L|jad--id ,illdI.iD dll..:!lillia| 2Uilljou|Ell IJ Oll®Fn rr-· x ~ir n r 111'7 r 71' 1 r . C:-..5 7. i 5....3.J SHORTEN NEW WINDOW i 1- IN ORIGINAL LOCATION It --I 0 240 t._·#0.- rf 5£7 .0 -'4· ·-, -1.-Mite - 0.- A ..4. EL •1' - •O. '·..r •Ic,0, row •L lo z · i./~~ 9*91</*9 312 i 1.8. 16.. 1 1 South *421-U22 Galena SOUTH ELEVATION - PAPTIAL £16 ..m".t - PROPERTY LINE 0,\E dE AraA·A.,r e~.De. 44 l*1 0 000 0 0 10 00 7 - £13 - to,- cr i 11 ,1 . 1 1 rr=- -1 .- , 1.. . 1. 0 1 1 . -- ---... - - 140 - ~r--1 ~ 9* 49 E-n 6-- -J i I ! .3 1 , -LM.-F.----'-lf' r---"' =-===/gQ;=me=m-- 44.--1 r..... •.4-•-1 04 ....~~~IL.~......- ='11------ f: i 9 4 ., E-4 4 --ill. 6 1 1 P 11 11 1 - - --2 11 ' V 1 + ic-1-;-- 11 &~ 1 el i W! v.,6 , *-0- Ai Li L 4 1 -_ 2*22'al k. -11 1 - - ../In••- 1 P.-'ll. - if -94-1 r 1 r- - 1 r-'.1 E- - -1 ' 1 ,-IL\Ir ) _ l.0 +~-'~ -- 1- 1 - , . 1 1 .4 1 1 4:a€.u::/=A ; .-*J 1 - .al•40 - - , *:465»-r I./.r E T 1-w,•,2. La••D•6• - I.../ V. Ck* A•6 / EOCI:~ 1 ,-I V I = / 92 - 8€· I.Ir- w.e *- m·cf nor ·-T i \\ if ft 1 - ~ull - --.i.----.- - il-.-ig---I - --- u L i -1 -:= -0.*2 [ L rE· Wra 147[3-.£- 1 TELL Te-1 - .0. Z t ..,·.r rfet:ML If.... -1 . 1...0 ...... **rAL. 0 -r 1 3.i 1 213 1 M 1 .... 4¢-- .A'N --*AL~.1 12, 3.846.-- Ner-E:'6 0 ......:4 ........,4 W I ./. ·i •r t......er r.•· Al ..., 7. 'le- r••.... M 1 ./. NE' ..6....4-4 'f. "'Af./Mt 312 m. iN. South Galena SITE 1 ROOF PLAN 916 ./11. Iligwili/129'13121"/flaili~MUll~/Rt//1~1~Ufl' Contribution Acknowledgment Receipt The 1993 Tax Act requires donors to obtain written acknowledgments from charitable - organizations as evidence of the deduction for federal income tax purposes, effective January 1, 1994. Since the law provides that your canceled check is no longer sufficient evidence for deductions of $250 or more, we recommend that you file this receipt and our letter with your other income tax documents. In accordance with the Act, we also confirm that the Aspen Center for Environmental Studies (ACES) did not provide any goods or services in consideration for this contribution. Donor Name: Mr. John Davis and Mr. Mark Halderman The Aspen Downtown LL Description of in-kind contribution to ACES: 4 speakers 5 round tables - 20 chairs 4 bar stools 3 small kitchen scales 1 glass cart on casters 1 stainless steel sink plates and silverware Date recorded: March 1, 2000 The Aspen Center for Environmental Studies is a 501(c)3 not-for-profit organization. Our Federal I.D. number is 23-7042291. Authorized Signature 96*1 busanne Morrison Development Director 100 PUPPY SMITH STREET · ASPEN, CO 81611 • 970/925-5756 • FAN 970/925-4819 f 3 1 41% -2,01 4>4»71-~ 1. 14 .