The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutLand Use Case.511 Lazy Chair Dr.0062.2014.ASLU0062.2014. ASLU 1.-, -511 LAZY CHAIR ROAD 8040 REVIEW 1 ' 2735 11302002 3413\. -r External Media Imported Here P A 44 M-006014 f i RMM .: 6.3 42[ 9-4,Â· & =~':.rÂ»Â·f : 1 1 :--'Â·/ Â·9Â·,Â·RESÂ·'AL thÂ» Â· :1: t'I;WEÂ¥13:~i-/ #.-"ik. 4.7.7&'i 1,i.;:22= 0 . THE CITY OF ASPEN City of Aspen Community Development Department AUL +4 CASE NUMBER 0062.2014.ASLU PARCEL ID NUMBERS 2735 1130 2002 11 /1 5-1-A_-~--Â»/ L--2 - 06 PROJECTS ADDRESS S,1 LAZY CHAIR ROAD , Ft PLANNER JUSTIN BARKER CASE DESCRIPTION 8040 GREEN LINE REVIEW REPRESENTATIVE STEEV WILSON DATE OF FINAL ACTION 11.20.14 (WITHDRAWN) DATE OF FINAL REFUND/ 1.8.15 PAYMENT CLOSED BY ANGELA SCOREY ON: 1.8.15 .. + Justin Barker From: Dustin Anderson <danderson@forumphi.com> Sent: Thursday, November 20, 2014 9:45 AM To: Justin Barker CC: Steev Wilson Subject: Re: 511 Lazy Chair Justin, U (TupeAwN 3-58 11~0~24+t Thanks for getting back to me on this. We agree, lets close out the original 511 Lazy Chair 8040 Greenline Review, address the refund, and prepare the pre-application letter/review for lots 2&3 for 511 Lazy Chair road. Also, if you could refresh my memory, what process do we need to take to get a new address for lot 3 or is that a topic we address further down the road? Last, Is it possible to get on the P&Z schedule for January or will that date be assigned upon issue of the letter of completeness once we turn in the 8040 submissions with HOA schematic design approvals? Regards, On Tue, Nov 18,2014 at 3:52 PM, Justin Barker <Justin.Barker@citvofaspen.com> wrote: Hi Dustin, Since the original application has been pulled from all agendas we would like for this to be formally withdrawn, and we will reimburse for any unbilled portion of the deposit. You mentioned bringing both Lots 2 &3 in for review at the same time. We would like for these to be two new separate applications (as they are separate properties) with two deposits, but we would be more than happy to accommodate reviewing them at the same meeting. I hope this answers your questions. Let me know i f you need anything else. Justin Barker AICP \ LEED Green Assoc \ CNU-A Planner I City of Aspen 130 S. Galena St. Aspen, CO 81611 T 970.429.2797 1 e . F 970.920.5439 www.aspenpitkin.com Notice and Disclaimer: This message is intended only for the individual or entity to which it is addressed and may contain information that is confidential and exempt from disclosure pursuant to applicable law If you are not the intended recipient, please reply to the sender that you have received the message in error and then delete it- Further. the information or opinions contained in this email are advisory in nature only and are not binding on the City of Aspen If applicable. the information and opinions contain in the email are based on current zoning, which is subject to change In the future, and upon factual representations that may or may not be accurate. The opinions and information contained herein do not create a legal or vested right or any claim of detrimental reliance Dustin Anderson - Assoc. AIA, LEED AP ARCHITECTURE I INTERIORS I PLANNING 715 W Main St I Ste. 204I Aspen CO 81611 p 970.319.7399 If 866.770.5585 I forumphi.com 2 .. 0733-Il 30 2.002_ 00(02 Â·20(4.Aitu .in., Â· lu, fle B : iecot Na/gate FArm Report Fog Iab Help ~ : ': 4 0 " 1 0.: A 41 3 1 tv % i 1 , -2 5 0:, 0 -J * 12 0 4 . ............._._.. ...._........... -it. ' t' F. M *i ~~am~ Custom Fields : Royting Statuls Fee Summall Actions Routing HIstory 'f I ;11 Permit Â¢ ~[1062 201.1 All} 3 Permit type faslu &.Y' I %94 i ~Il ~ int*51 1 Lai IU U Ot 0 1 { 0 Address jill LALY l:MAIR [,IR AR/suim I -1 -,1."61 0 06; AK' LI:i Shte ICLI ~ Zip .6 1611 0 Q I Permit Diformation 1 3- Master permit! I Routing queue aslu07 .Â®plied ~l'i.15:2[J14 | Proled St@tus Ipending Approved ~ i nocrdÂ®nn APPLICA.TION FOR ESA 8040 STREmUNE MARGIN - EXISTING SFR TOBI 2 : i & -'/,Flwl i Issued j DEMOLISHED FOR REDEVELOPME!Â·ff 0025.2014 ASW 511 LAZY CIWR DRIVE I ./. 3 -Â· i UUSÂ®f fnal , ~ n,r-i~ Aqi ni,i Clock ~GFIF| Days | Expires ~ Submitted ibl[EV Â¥Â¥1LbÂ·JiN 01,262016 I Ovmer Lag name LAZY CHA]R LOT 2 LLC , First name |LAZY CHAIR LOT 3 LLC 511 LAZY CHAIR DR , ASPEN CO 81611 Address 80:ne {970~2794109 Applicant 3 Owner is applicant? L Contradoris apolicant? Last name 'MLSON 0 117 SOUTH SPRING ST ' i li . QTIZE~.0 1 rl:q name gl LL Â¥ 1 202 Ph:one 19701 274 1100 : :IUJ I Cu* f Â®61 Addrpx ASPEN CO 81611 Lender Last name 1 First name l : none 41- Address ! Disolavs the pennillendefs address .AspenGoldS(se:Je( 29?8'35 08Â¢* 1 OM 0 ' 00 =0 102,9 m Co pdo + 7 4,410 .00 34.cUft, 3 665-5- Pa r FLU Bel'- â‚¬b sele 40!n D 'Â·lgll .. Special Meeting Planning & Zoning Commission September 9, 2014 MINUTES - August 12, 2014 Mr. Gibbs moved to approve the August 12, 2014 minutes, seconded by Ms. Tygre. Mr. Erspamer asked the wording a sentence under the Declaration of Conflict of Interested section be corrected. The change was noted to be made prior to finalizing the minutes. All in favor, motion carried. MINUTES - August 19, 2014 Mr. Gibbs moved to approve the August 19, 2014 minutes, seconded by Ms. Tygre. All in favor, motion carried. DECLARATION OF CONFLICT OF INTEREST None. Public Hearing - 511 Lazy Chair, 8040 Greenline Review Ms. Quinn submitted the affidavits of public notice as Exhibit C demonstrating notice has been properly provided. Mr. Barker, Planner with the Community Development Department, presented the project to the commission. It is an 8040 Greenline Review located at 511 Lazy Chair Road. The 8040 Greenline Review is a P&Z review of all development at, above or 150 ft measured below the elevation of 8,040 ft. The purpose of the review is to protect the ecological, environmental and scenic significance of the high elevation areas throughout a heightened review process. The subject property is approximately 2.4 acres in size in the rural residential zone district and is also part of the Arthur O Pfister Subdivision which is completely surrounded bythe Maroon Creek Club PUD. The applicant is proposing to demolish the existing single family home currently on the property and replace it with a new single family home. For this property, there was a recent subdivision amendment. Ordinance #12-2014 placed an additional restriction on the property that no development could occur above 8,060 ft except for what is reasonably necessary for utility infrastructure, storm water mitigation, maintenance and restoration of native landscaping and wildfire mitigation purposes. The only development proposed at this time above the line is to bury the existing electrical line, which staff supports and finds it to be in line with those particular needs. Staff has found this project is generally in compliance with the review criteria for 8040 Greenline Review. The proposed development will be larger than the existing structure which inherently brings more impacts to the environment, but through the presented application, they have shown how they will minimize or complete mitigate those additional impacts created by the development. Staff is in support of this application. The engineering and parks departments have reviewed the projects and any concerns they have are included in the proposed resolution. Mr. Erspamer asked if there were any questions for staff. 2 .. Special Meetine Planning & Zoning Commission September 9,2014 Mr. Erspamer asked what portion of the building can be above the 8,040 ft line. Mr. Barker stated the only portion that can be above this line arethe items written intothe ordinance#12-2014 which includes the utility infrastructure and storm water mitigation. The height of the building itself can be above the line, but the development cannot be located above the line. Mr. Erspamer asked if the foundation would be considered the development at which Mr. Barker confirmed as correct. Mr. Erspamer turned the floor over to the applicant. Mr. Dustin Anderson with Forum Phi Architecture is representingthe applicant for the proposed development. Mr. Anderson stated they worked with the Parks Department prior to any demolition or construction on the site to discuss any concerns previously listed. He stated those concerns would be addressed priorto submitting for a permit. In regards to the mass and height reflected in the drawings, the proposed structure is well below the height limitation as perthe buildingordinance. Mr. Erspamer asked if there were any questions for the applicant. Mr. Erspamer asked what seed would be used to restore the mitigated utility burial area so it will look like the natural terrain. Mr. Anderson stated an Aspen Parks Department approved seed mix will be used to restore the area. The approved seed mix does not rely on future irrigation to maintain the seeded areas. Mr. Erspamer asked Mr. Barker if the retaining walls are included in the criteria to be judged. Mr. Barker stated the retaining walls are not to be considered in the criteria forthis project. Mr. Erspamer also asked that the groundwater is also not part of the discussion. Mr. Barker confirmed the groundwater is not to be considered in the criteria for this project. Mr. Erspameropened forpubliccomment. Mr. Rudi Scheidt lives at 120 Pfeifer which is adjacent to the property in the application. He understands what the committee does, but he is not sure the whole story has been told about the project. He has some environmental concerns as well as concerns about the scope and the nature of the size of the home. He is impressed by the drawings of the home presented with the application, but stated the drawings only represent 1/3 of the story. The other 2/3 of the home is underground. The proposed home is 30,000 ft below grade. The construction time for the home is estimated between four- six years. He has not seen the full plans and project timeline, but as a neighbor he is concerned about the excavation of the dirt to dig 55 ft down. He is asking the commission to delay the decision until they have the opportunity to review the full scope and staff has an opportunity to review the full environmental impact of this project. He is concerned about the homes in Aspen being built below grade because they have found a loophole within the laws to build massive structures. He questions what the true value of these homes going forward. The proposed 40,000 sf is four times the size of any home in the subdivision. In regards to the environmental impact he wanted to question staffs comments regarding the true impact based on the depth of the project as noted in item #2 on p 41 of the agenda packet. In regards to item #9 on p 42 of the packet, he is concerned that the Lazy Chair Road is small and narrow. He is not sure the road can handle stress from the number of excavation trucks necessary to haul outthe dirt forthe project, which he has heard is in the 1005. He also feels the additional truck traffic will have an adverse effect on the home sitting below the road. He is also 3 .. Special Meeting Planning & Zoning Commission September 9,2014 concerned the length and noise of the construction will impact the natural life in the area as well. He noted the board's discussions in previous meetings regarding structures being out of place with the neighborhood. Although the above grade portion of the structure is in line with the neighboring structures, the overall size of the proposed structure is fourtimes largerthan anything in the neighborhood. Shlomo Ben-Hamoo also lives in area and has similar concerns as Mr. Scheidt. He believes there is also a helicopter pad in the application. He enjoys the space the neighborhood currently provides and prefers it stays the way it currently exists. He feels the proposed structure is too large for the neighborhood. He wanted to know if there is any limitation on the sf they can build. Ms. Phelan wanted to clarify a few items brought up. She assumes both of the gentlemen who spoke at public comment live in the Maroon Creek Club. In regards to what can be built in the Maroon Creek Club, there are 10 single family lots off of Tiehack Rd that allow 10,000 sf of floor area. There are 33 lots that allow either 5,500 or 6,000 sf of floor area. All of them are allowed a 4,000 sf basement exemption and a 500 sf garage exemption based on county approval for the subdivision. In addition, the City Council approved on the previous night the allowance of landing of transferrable development rights on those properties of 500 or 750 sf of floor area. So some larger lots allow for larger sf totals. This meeting tonight is not a zoning review, but the Community Development Department is estimating the allowable floor area for this subject lot is 6,700 sf which tends to be mostly above grade. A certain amount of the basement will be included in the floor area. So people can build large basements which don't count towards the overall sf allowed for the lot. The application states the basement is roughly 3,800 sf. Mr. Anderson stated there is a walk out and a sub grade basement, each being around 15,000 sf per floor. Then there is the main level and the master suite. Ms. Phelan then asked for the gross size of the building at which Mr. Anderson replied the size is about 38,000 sf. Ms. Phelan stated there currently is not any requirements for below grade caps. Ms. Phelan stated this property was annexed in 1996 at the same time as the Maroon Creek Club. Mr. Erspamer closed public comment. Mr. Erspamer opened for applicant rebuttal/clarification. Mr. Anderson wanted to respond to some of the public comments. In regards to the reference to the four to six year construction timeframe, he stated the actual numbers have not been released from the Forum Phi office. As they are proceeding with the development of the plans, they identified a conservative construction period of 3.5 years. They are working on engineeringthat back to the 18-24 months as requested by the Maroon Creek Club. He also wanted to reiterate they are not part of the HOA. A helicopter pad was previously licensed with the FAA by Betty Pfister. The owner owns both lots 2 and 3 and remainder is in the Maroon Creek Club common space. Mr. Erspamer asked Mr. Anderson if he was aware of the estimated weight of the trucks. Mr. Anderson knows there is a weight restriction in the spring for the road. Mr. Erspamer asked Ms. Phelan to confirm if they should only be discussing the 8040 Greenline review at tonight's meeting. Ms. Phelan said they were not aware of the extra fully sub grade basement because it is not included in the design set, so the Engineering Department has not had an opportunity to even look at it in light of the review standards. Ms. Phelan feels the decision should be continued to allow forthe application to be completely reviewed. 4 .. Special MeetinE Planning & Zoning Commission September 9,2014 Mr. Gibbs found the application and staff analysis to be lacking in detail regardingthe size of the building. He would like to see a comparison of the footage above and below the 8040 line as well as a comparison to the existing building. If there are variances to be granted, this application would need to be presented again, so he feels it would be appropriate to continue it at this time. Ms. Tygre agreed. Mr. Erspamer stated he would like to see definitive criteria vs. "we anticipate" or "we feel". He is also in favor of continuing it as well. Mr. Goode asked the applicant if the Parks Department was made aware of the subgrade basement. Mr. Anderson stated it was not required until they submit for permit. Their submittal is consistent with the 8040 Greenline Review. Ms. Tygre moved to continue the hearing until September 16, 2014 with a purpose of determining the date certain for the continuance. Mr. Goode seconded the motion. All in favor, motion carried. Meeting adjourned at 5:14 pm. Cindy Klob City Clerk's Office, Records Manager 5 .. AGENDA ASPEN PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION TUESDAY, September 9, 2014 SPECIAL MEETING: 4:30 p.m. Sister Cities room 130 S. Galena Street, Aspen I. ROLL CALL II. COMMENTS A. Commissioners B. Planning Staff C. Public III. MINUTES - 3- 1 1-1 (.F.'-_~ - ) Ci e / L.f IV. DECLARATION OF CONFLICT OF INTEREST V. PUBLIC HEARINGS - A) 511 Lazy Chair, 8040 Greenline review VI. OTHER BUSINESS VII. ADJOURN Next Resolution Number: U .. P1 Typical Proceeding Format for All Public Hearings 1) Conflicts of Interest (handled at beginning o f agenda) 2) Provide proof of legal notice (affidavit of notice for PH) 3) Staff presentation 4) Board questions and clarifications of staff 5) Applicant presentation 6) Board questions and clarifications of applicant 7) Public comments 8) Board questions and clarifications relating to public comments 9) Close public comment portion of hearing 10) Staff rebuttal/clarification of evidence presented by applicant and public comment 11) Applicant rebuttal/clarification End of fact finding. Deliberation by the commission commences. No further interaction between commission and staff, applicant or public 12) Chairperson identified the issues to be discussed among commissioners. 13) Discussion between commissioners* 14) Motion* *Make sure the discussion and motion includes what criteria are met or not met. Revised April 2,2014 .. P32 MEMORANDUM To: City of Aspen Planning and Zoning Commission THRU: Jennifer Phelan, Community Development Deputy Director FROM: Justin Barker, Planner RE: 511 Lazy Chair Ranch Road - 8040 Greenline Review Resolution No. _, Series of 2014 DATE: September 9, 2014 APPLICANT /OWNER: 2 11 Lazy Chair Lot 2 LLC ~. i ; 4Â· 11-4,Â· 04 0-Â· 1 1 7. 4,71.ri ...a , REPRESENTATIVE: 1 4 Forum Phi Architecture '~ ; 2. : . LOCATION: \ O 1 0 511 Lazy Chair Ranch Road Â·%2-7> ~I ki,. 00'. - .i L.,~ . Â· ~ ;41 1 L-, 7 PID#: 2735-113-02-002 1,<Py.. 1 0 1 I.* g.9, 14 1, 46. 1 /1 CURRENT ZONING: i 0 :/MAROON--CREEK.RD 22= /5. RR - Rural Residential -1-_1 .2, i 8 ,41 Â·N Â· ; ,. 3* 1 99 1 1,0 4. 203 1 - A, 1. 1 : . SUMMARY: Locator Map The Applicant proposes demolition of the existing home and construction of a new single-family home on the property. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends the Planning and Zoning Commission approve the request with conditions. LAND USE REQUEST: Applicant is requesting the following land use approvals from the Planning and Zoning Commission: â€¢ 8040 Greenline Review - (Chapter 26.435.030, 8040 Greentine Review) for development within the 8040 Greenline review area. The Planning and Zoning Commission is the final decision-making body. 1 .. P33 The purpose of the 8040 Greenline Review is to protect the ecological, environmental and scenic significance of high elevation areas through a heightened review process for new development. Development within the 8040 Greenline review area is subject to a heightened review to reduce impacts on the natural watershed and surface runoff, minimize air pollution, reduce the potential for avalanche, unstable slope, rockfall and mudslide and aid in the transition of agricultural and forestry land uses to urban uses. PROJECT SUMMARY: The subject property is approximately 2.4 acres and is located in the RR zone district. The property is located iii the Arthur O. Pfister Subdivision, surrounded by the Maroon Creek Club PUD. There is currently a single-family home located on the property. The applicant is proposing to demolish the existing home and construct a new single-family home. STAFF EVALUATION: The 8040 Greenline is the topographical line located 8040 feet above mean sea level. The Land Use Code states that no development shall be permitted at, above or 150 feet below (measured horizontally) the 8040 Greenline unless the Planning and Zoning Commission makes a determination that the proposed development complies with the review standards. *glimi~,6.91 fitÂ· )4 1 7 11- -s ;8/*C'isA13*:' -4 ,: Â· 4 - ~may .Â¥ 14 -Â¥. % 9;40 /1. I y.,2~bm//51** ~E~~3 - 3- 2 . 434 - I i.Â· LY,~ .3 .3 . 7. ..+ . , 1,71/ . ; 1 ./ . 4 - . : Ak :4~~'.1: '2* f 4 121/1/51/ i ..Elll' , .Rt..).e 0.11 1. . -U- 4 .22% , e.Â£* Â· 44. . C.4 ...â€¢34'mli 2. 4.4 $*u -f' 31*) , fe:,21 4*4;0 *, , r.Â·~eÂ¢44Â·.,-4 Â· 14 .1 4. Â¥ <A * 4 911/4#.4 ~ N~,libftit-f:;-Aa 01 *:. /1, Â· 1. ,â€¢1 44 - . 44 j Â· T.**had<-~.4..I:Â¥ .u x' : 1 , '~â€¢ 4k ~ . ,<t.*4'92' f Ill h, ...f..'' Â¥,1 - . . ARth, R Ar â‚¬ k ,- I. ., 4 4 Â·1Â·.\. 1.Z...27Â·.T .. j. . L.8-- I *li ./ -21,4 ' 3 . .1 i/ 491*ke'. e 16 - /1. , >24. *Ficâ€¢-3â€¢Â· ,Â§10, 4 W- L , 1 9 61**,14' .... -â‚¬'1*,4: . -1 e. 1 e... 1-* -24 ..:: 41*-21 . 464 A I # 4. 1 9.-: ,. 1: 9 464 6 3- * 1. -f./ imi L : f â€¢1 w,-2K,E ' Â· , 14424 40; e 49- 44U 7 .r L 4.14 - ..3 31. h -22 . ~ . 'i X . 3:.: 14: 11 't' 'E--1'8;64.2--4), ... N. . % I : 'he k i :2.~ Â·- I 7 5 ..... : '0,1 =h ..... . -1,4. Â«Â¥Â¥ ~ Â· ~' -f2~4:F Â·f, .. .?r Â£ .Â·' k'F'~a' ' 1 El ..1*uj Figure A Property Boundary 8040 Greenline ....... Subject to Review -- --- -" ~-~ ~-- i 2 ..Â»C' .. P34 As shown in Figure A, the 8040 Greenline runs through the middle of the property, making almost the entire property subject to review. This property also has an additional requirement that no development may occur above 8060 feet above mean sea level, (per Ordinance No. 12, Series of 2014) except as reasonably necessary for utility infrastructure, storm water mitigation, maintenance or restoration of native landscape, and wildfire mitigation needs. The only development above this line that is proposed is to bury the existing electrical line underground. Staff finds this to be a benefit to the site by hiding utility lines and preserving the natural views. Generally, most of the review criteria focuses on the suitability of the site for development, the environmental impacts of the development, and the availability of services and infrastructure for the development. The new development is larger than the existing, therefore creating more impacts to the environment. However, the applicant has demonstrated in the application how these impacts will either be minimized or mitigated: Since this lot has been previously developed, the services and infrastructure already exist. Staff finds the project to be in conformance with the review criteria. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends the Planning and Zoning Commission approve 8040 Greenline Review with conditions. REFERRAL DEPARTMENTS: Engineering and Parks Departments have reviewed the application and any applicable comments are included in the proposed resolution. RECOMMENDED MOTION (ALL MOTIONS ARE IN THE AFFIRMATIVE): "I move to approve Resolution No. , Series of 2014, approving 8040 Greenline Review for the project located at 511 Lazy Chair Ranch Road with conditions." EXHIBITS: A. Review Criteria - 8040 Greenline review standards B. Application 3 .. P35 RESOLUTION NO. (SERIES OF 2014) A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF ASPEN PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION APPROVING 8040 GREENLINE REVIEW FOR THE PROPERTY LOCATED AT 511 LAZY CHAIR RANCH ROAD, LEGALLY DESCRIBED AS LOT 2, ARTHUR O. PFISTER FULLY DEVELOPED LANDS SUBDIVISION EXEMPTION, ACCORDING TO THE PLAT THEREOF RECORDED APRIL 14, 1993 IN PLAT BOOK 42 AT PAGE 45, AS RECEPTION NO. 4033369, PITKIN COUNTY, COLORADO. Parcel ID: 2735-113-02-002. WHEREAS, the Community Development Department received an application from Lazy Chair Lot 2 LLC, represented by Forum Phi Architecture, requesting approval of 8040 Greenline Review for the construction of a new single-family home at 511 Lazy Chair Ranch Road, legally described as Lot 2, Arthur O. Pfister Fully Developed Lands Subdivision Exemption, according to the plat thereof recorded April 14, 1993 in Plat Book 42 at Page 45, as Reception No. 4033369, Pitkin County, Colorado; and, WHEREAS, the Applicant requests approval by the Planning and Zoning Commission for 8040 Greenline Review; and, WHEREAS, the property is zoned Rural Residential (RR); and, WHEREAS, upon initial review of the application and the applicable code standards, the Community Development Department recommended approval of the application with conditions; and, WHEREAS, during a duly noticed public hearing on September 9, 2014, the Planning and Zoning Commission approved Resolution No. _, Series of 2014, by a ___ to - C - _) vote, approving 8040 Greenline Review; and, WHEREAS, the Planning and Zoning Commission has reviewed and considered the development proposal under the applicable provisions of the Municipal Code as identified herein, has reviewed and considered the recommendation of the Community Development Director, the applicable referral agencies, and has taken and considered public comment; and, WHEREAS, the Planning and Zoning Commission finds that the development proposal meets or exceeds all applicable development standards and that the approval of the development proposal, with conditions, is consistent with the goals and elements of the Aspen Area Community Plan; and, WHEREAS, the Planning and Zoning Commission finds that this Resolution furthers and is necessary for the promotion ofpublic health, safety, and welfare. Resolution No. _, Series 2014 Page 1 of 6 .. P36 NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED BY THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF ASPEN, COLORADO THAT: Section 1: Pursuant to the procedures and standards set forth in Title 26 of the Aspen Municipal Code, the Planning and Zoning Commission hereby approves 8040 Greenline Review for the property located at 511 Lazy Chair Ranch Road. Section 2: Approval of 8040 Greenline review for this project is not a reliance on the dimensions provided in the application. All aspects of this project shall still meet the dimensional requirements of the zone district in which the propeity is located, and all other requirements of the Land Use Code, as applicable. Section 3: Final design shall be compliant with all sections of the City of Aspen Municipal Code, Titles 21,28, and 29. The design for the site must meet the Engineering Design Standards which includes the Urban Runoff Management Plan requirements, Construction Mitigation Plan, and Construction and Excavation Standards. Section 4: The removal or relocation of any trees will require a Tree Removal permit from the Parks Department in accordance with Title 13 0 f the City of Aspen Municipal Code, prior to any removal or relocation. The removal of the existing fence that currently runs through the drip lines of trees will need to be addressed from the Parks Department, prior to Building Permit submittal. Tree protection fencing shall be up prior to any construction or demolition on this property. A fence line shall be erected that keeps the existing natural vegetation safe and secure from any activity around the proposed development. The proposed development shall minimize disturbance of native vegetation & preserve groupings of Gamble Oak. Section 5: All material representations and commitments made by the Applicant pursuant to the development proposal approvals as herein awarded, whether in public hearing or documentation presented before the Planning and Zoning Commission or City Council, are hereby incorporated in such plan development approvals and the same shall be complied with as if fully set forth herein, unless amended by an authorized entity. Section 6: This Resolution shall not affect any existing litigation and shall not operate as an abatement of any action or proceeding now pending under or by virtue of the ordinances Resolution No. _, Series 2014 Page 2 of 6 .. P37 repealed or amended as herein provided, and the same shall be conducted and concluded under such prior ordinances. Section 7: If any section, subsection, sentence, clause, phrase, or portion of this Resolution is for any reason held invalid or unconstitutional in a court of competent jurisdiction, such portion shall be deemed a separate, distinct and independent provision and shall not affect the validity of the remaining portions thereof. til APPROVED BY the Planning and Zoning Commission of the City of Aspen on this 9 day of September, 2014. APPROVED AS TO FORM: PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION: Debbie Quinn, Asst. City Attorney LJ Erspamer, Chair ATTEST: Cindy Klob, Records Manager Exhibits: I. Approved Site Plan II. Approved Elevations Resolution No. _, Series 2014 Page 3 of 6 .. P38 EXHIBIT I 1 t f % 1 Â§* I . - Lo.Â·4~ LlivEL t~ , , 9/W ...... 4.ojiu#i,-*:i 6 *4. = \ - 1. . 1 -9 ... live i .........._2.4.' Â·~. 141 4.4,0 -: ~.O&~L, ~~2~-r,~r~?Â»: i .Â·PEN ./EL . EWA. 12#=Me: \1 L-A=--1 1 31*nr- , PAToolcvâ€¢â€¢DE .-292:C; 1 12\ P...rOLE --,< 1 1 1 ....... Â· i % . 11 1 11 1. Clu S. V.4.1 11~ A + . -/ r . 1 - / Â· I-Ug#.REEDSÂ·TE./REl-7 1 -m*_ I .: SE ~ 2 4 1 1 i' 1 1. ' '4' i 53 IL 1 . -- *,/ , '' L,L:uleâ‚¬DSIIEMEA- Â·, ! 1. i~, ,r A 7*. --- -, -3)130- ' . .......1 -- ' DV.1!AGE PA~14-/- #\ . 1, '1 ' St , 40.- ~-'.- '93,4, 4 1 1 1 W ..... 2,6,%490./. LOWER LEVEL ELEV = 8027 ..~1.-C ~,.. . 3.w 1 1- var RELOCATED EVERGREEN ' RELOCATED DECIDUOUS ~ PROPOSED EVERGREEN Â· 4~ PROPOSED DECIDUOUS .- Resolution No. _, Series 2014 Page 4 of 6 .. P39 EXHIBIT II .'94 1 i '34- imait.913,1 -~- O L 4 070 2 W- F- +#*ie.*43' 95=taki 1 U 1 1-112113 0 El '121 - 1 - -1 1 ' ' 11'U-311_LK' Â· = . '. 11. : - U 1 ~ - - 3/2 -4 /4,7 LF-*i-,-*/lif k.-1-1 11 --I--=i .k ~ - I LE =11.21 - .A 1 0140 1 i *10*24 1 1 ~ ;b7~~f . 3tfl*r-- A = 2- 11 ' C.=%21 1 il i l-JLJ - Ng:j 1 '1:-~-,1 1 1 13 e â‚¬0% lilli 1 47JI ,%9*4 . 1, k ...â‚¬144 - 14%943 ~ -9--/34 Â«4224 Resolution No. _, Series 2014 Page 5 of 6 790.- .. E =m=- -~-1 El L-fLJ- 1-3--A- Wi/ .iÂ·gT.â€¢w,Kl 4,1 E -- 1 ~L 2 -1 1 Il rfof Resolution No. _, Series 2014 Page 6 of 6 .. P41 EXHIBIT A 26.435.030.C. 8040 Greenline review standards. No development shall be permitted at, above or one hundred fifty (150),feet below the 8040 Greenline unless the Planning and Zoning Commission makes a determination that the proposed development complies with all requirements set forth below. 1. The parcel on which the proposed development is to be located is suitable for development considering its slope, ground stability characteristics, including mine subsidence and the possibility of mudflow, rock falls and avalanche dangers. If the parcel is found to contain hazardous or toxic soils, the applicant shall stabilize and revegetate the soils or, where necessary, cause them to be removed from the site to a location acceptable to the City. Staff Findings: The Engineering Department has reviewed the Geological Hazards and Soils Reports submitted in the application and has determined that the parcel is suitable for development considering the review criteria listed above. Staff finds this criterion to be met. 2. The proposed development does not have a significant adverse affect on the natural watershed, runoff, drainage, soil erosion or have consequent effects of water pollution. Staff Findings: Runofffrom impervious surfaces is proposed to be retained and injiltrated on site. Overflow will be released at historic undevelm?ed flow rate. Rip rap and vegetation will be used to dissipate energy leaving the site. All Aspen water requirements will be met. Sta#finds this criterion to be met. 3. The proposed development does not have a significant adverse affect on the air quality in the City. Staff Findings: The applicant has proposed a dust and debris control plan as. well as emissions control for construction vehicles in order to minimize the effects to the air. Stafffinds this criterion to be met. 4. The design and location of any proposed development, road or trail is compatible with the terrain on the parcel on which the proposed development is to be located. Staff Findings: A large portion of the structure will be located below grade and is designed to work with the existing terrain. The existing road will be used and no trails are proposed. Sta#finds this criterion to be met. 5. Any grading will minimize, to the extent practicable, disturbance to the terrain, vegetation and natural land features. Staff Findings: Soil nail walls will be used for shoring to minimize the disturbance to the site. Ordinance 12, Series of 2014 prohibits development above 80601 other than utilities, storm water mitigation, native landscaping and wilÂ®re mitigation. The proposed structure will be located similarly to the existing structure and will generally maintain the existing natural features on site. Stajffinds this criterion to be met. .. P42 6. The placement and clustering of structures will minimize the need for roads, limit cutting and grading, maintain open space and preserve the mountain as a scenic resource. Staff Findings: There is only one proposed structure located where the current structure sits. No additional access will be created. Only grading necessary for the construction of the home and to control stormwater will be done. Stajffinds this criterion to be met. 7. Building height and bulk will be minimized and the structure will be designed to blend into the open character of the mountain. Staff Findings: The building is under the allowable height limit and is set largely below grade. The building is designed with vegetated roofs and walls to help blend into the natural landscape. Stalffinds this criterion to be met. 8. Sufficient water pressure and other utilities are available to service the proposed development. Staff Findings: A City of Aspen potable water tank is located just west of this property. The bottom of the tank sits 31.5 feet higher than the upper floor of the house creating approximately 13.5 psi of static head. A booster pump may be required for the upper floors depending on flows. A fire pump -will be needed for the sprinkler system and an existing hydrant will be moved closer to the driveway. Overhead electrical service is from the -west and is proposed to be relocated underground. Sewer will be discharged to the manhole to the northeast. All other utilities will run under the driveway. Stafffinds this criterion to be met. 9. Adequate roads are available to serve the proposed development and said roads can be properly maintained. Staff Findings: There is an existing driveway access that connects to Lazy Chair Ranch Road feeding into Tiehack Road. These roads can all be properly maintained. Sta#finds this criterion to be met. 10. Adequate ingress and egress is available to the proposed development so as to ensure adequate access for fire protection and snow removal equipment. Stajf Findings: The proposed driveway is wide enough for afire truck and snow plow to access and has a turnaround large enough for a "Y" style turn around that has been demonstrated in the application packet. Staifinds this criterion to be met. 11. The adopted regulatory plans of the Open Space and Trails Board are implemented in the proposed development, to the greatest extent practical. Staff Findings: The proposed development does not have any effect on any of the Open Space and Trails Board adopted regulatory plans. Stafffinds this criterion to be met. 1fk , 11 C AFFIDAVIT OF PUBLIC NOTICE REQUIR_ED BY SECTION 26.304.060 (E), ASPEN LAND USE CODE,~ ADDRESS pF PROPERTY: till Ltlt, 17' (!lialf Â£44[ Ctu/9 ,>L , Aspen, CO SCNEDULED PUBLIC HEARING DATE 443+ 1 th 41. '41) A,~h , 20 -tq, STATE OF COLORADO ) County of Pitkin ) Pj 02UL dth, MA 4 (name, please print) being or representing an Applicant to thâ‚¬ City of Aspen, Colorado, hereby personally certify that I have complied with the public notice requirements of Section 26.304.060 (E) o f the Aspen Land Use Code in the following manner: Publication of notice. By the publication in the legal notice section of an official paper or a paper of general circulation in the City of Aspen at least fifteen (15) days prior to the public hearing. A copy of the publication is attached hereto. Posting of notice: B-y posting of notice, which form was obtained from the Community Development Department, which was made of suitable, waterproof materials, which was not less than twenty-two (22) inches wide and twenty-six (26) inches high, and which was composed of letters not less than one inch in height. Said notice was posted at least fifteen (15) days prior to the public hearing on the day of , 20 , to and including the date and time of the public hearing. A photograph of the posted notice (sign) is attached Â·hereto. Mailing of notice. By the mailing of a notice obtained from the Community Development Department, which contains the information descibed in Section 26.304.060(E)(2) of the Aspen Land Use Code. At least fifteen (15) days prior to the public hearing, notice was hand delivered or mailed by first class postage prepaid U.S. mail to all owners of property within three hundred (300) feet of the propety subject to the development application. The names and addresses of . .; .i. property owners shall be those on the current tax records of Pitkin County as they ,; : ~i ' appeared no more than sixty (60) days prior to the date of the public hearing. 4 4 . ing .... fli. ~':1 J . =6py. Of the owners and governmental agencies so noticed is attached hereto, Neighborhood Outreach: Applicant attests that neighborhood outreach, summarized and attached, was conducted prior to the first public hearing as required in Section 26.304.035, Neighborhood Outreach. A copy of the neighboiliood outleach suniniary, including the method of public notification and a copy of any documentation that was presented to the public is attached hereto. (continued on next page) J i Mineral Estate Owner Notice. By the certified mailing of notice, return receipt requested, to affected mineral estate owners by at least thirty (30) days prior to the date scheduled for the initial public hearing on the application of development. The names and addresses of mineral estate owners shall be those on the current tax records of Pitkin County. At a minimum, Subdivisions, SPAs or PUDs that create more than one lot, new Planned Unit Developments, and new Specially . Planned Areas, are subject to this notice requirement. Rezoning or text amendment. Whenever the official zoning district map is in.any ~ way to be changed or amended incidental to or as part of a general revision o f this Title, or whenever the text of this Title is to be amended, whether such revision be made by repeal of this Title and enactment of a new land use regulation, or otherwise, the requirement of an accurate survey map or other sufficient legal description of, and the notice to and listing of names and addresses of owners of real property in the area of the proposed change shall be waived. However, the proposed zoning map shall be available for public inspection in the planning agency during all business hours for fifteen (15) days prior to the public hearing on such amendments. ld#Â»4 64 0 Signature .9 The forÂ©going "Affirlavit of Notice" was ack~wledged befo79 me this3-~--~y of g~-~wd-t- , 20-0(by I taG_ Al-e,n n< tij WrINESS MY HAND AND OFFICIAL SEAL My commission expires: Cl[ I nfl k ku.\ .-_ 904-wb--74- Nota?y Public KAREN REED PATTERSON ~ NOTARY PUBLIC STATE OF COLORADO ATTACHMENTS AS APPLICABLE: NOTARY ID #19964002767 | My Commiss,on Expires February 15,2016 â€¢ COPY OF THE PUBLICATION - - --F â€¢ PHOTOGRAPH OF THE POSTED NOTICE (SIGN) e LIST OF THE OWNERS AND GOVERNMENTAL AGENCIES NOTICED BY MAIL â€¢ APPLICANT CERTIFICATION OF MINERAL ESTAE OWNERS NOTICE AS REQUIRED BY C.R.S. Â§24-65.5-103.3 PUBLiC NOTICE RE: 511 LAZY CHAIR RANCH RD - 8040 GREENLINE REVIEW NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that a public hearing will be held on Tuesday, September 9, 2014, at a meeting to begin at 4:30 p.m. before the Aspen Planning and Zoning Commission, Sister Cities Meeting Room, City Hall, 130 S. Galena St., As- pen, to consider an application submitted by the Lazy Chair Lot 2 LLC, c/o Millard J. Zimet, P.C. 604 W Main Street, Aspen, CO 81611, represeni ed by Forum Phi Architecture, for the propeny lo- cated at 511 Lazy Chair Ranch Rd. The applicant is requesting 8040 Greentine Review approval for the construction of a single-family home. The prop- erty is legally described as Lot 2. Arthur 0. Pfister Fully Development Lands Subdivision Exemption, according to the plat thereof recorded April 14. 1993 in Plat Book 42 at Page 45, as Reception No. 4033369. Pitkin County, Colorado, Parcel ID 273511302002. For furÂ·ther information. contact Justin Baker at the City of Aspen Community De- velopment Depallment, 130 S. Galena St., Aspen, CO.(970) 429.2797.justin, barker@cityofaspen.com. StiJ Eeap#na~._Gb#Air Aspen Planning and Zoning Commission 'ublished in the Aspen Times on August 21, 2014 'ublished in the Aspen Times Weekly on August 31, 2014(10471275) The Attom*rabove is acting as a debt collector and is attempting to collect a debt. Any information provided may be used for that purpose. Â©Public Trustees' Association of Colorado Revised 9/2012 Published in the Aspen Times Weekly July 31, 2014 and August 7,14,21, and 28,2014. (10398500) COMBINED NOTICE - PUBLICATION CRS Â§38-38-103 FORECLOSURE SALE NO. 14-012 To Whom It May Concern: This Notice is given with regard to the following described Deed of Trust: On June 4.2014, the undersigned Public Trustee caused the Notice 01 Election and Demand relating to the Deed of Trust described below to be record- ed in the County of Pitkin records. Original Grantor(s) Joseph B. Brown Original BeneficiarÂ·y(ies) Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. Current Holder of Evidence of Debt Wilmington Trust, National Association, as Succes- sor Trustee to Citibank, N.A., as Trustee for Bear Stearns Asset Backed Securities Trust 2007-SD3, Asset-Backed Certificates, Series 2007-SD3 Date of Deed of Trust March 28,2005 County of Recording ,1. Pitkin .. AFFIDAUT OF PL BLIC JOTICE REOURED B) NECTION 26.304.060 (E). AMPEN LAND USE CODE ADDNESS OF PROPERTJ : 4 8 LA-277 cH Al,2. rt ANLIA rLD , Aspen. CO SCHEDLLED PL BLIC HEARING DATE: /T-LeyDA 1 Se eTE MI32 2- 9 . 20 i M STATE OF COLORADO ) M %%. Count, of Pitkin ) 1. STrEv tv'IL50 0 ( !lanle. pleabe print) being or representing an Applicant to the City of Aspen. Colorado. hereby personally,~ certilj that I have complied â€žith the public notice requirementh 01' Section 26.304.060 CE) ofthe A>,pen Land Use Code in the following manner: ,- try Public ation of noticÂ·e \4 the publication in the legal notice Neetion of lan (,ilicial paper or a paper of general circulation in the Cit> of Aspen at least fifteen ( 15) days prior to the public hearing. ..1 cÂ·opv (11 che publication ix unacÂ·lied hereto. â‚¬w Posti,ig of notice.' By posting of notice. \ihich form uas obtained from the Community De,elopment Department. uhich -14 made ol suitable. naterproof materials. which was not less than twenty-two (22) inches zside and twenty-six (26) inches high. and â€žhich was composed of letters not less than one inch in height. Said notice u .10 posted at least fifteen ( 15 ) da> s prior to the public hearing on the .257 day of Aueusi . 20 /4. to and including the date and time 01 the public hearing. A photograph ,)f flic posted notice (sign) is unached hereto. 5(.U .th/i/ing ot no/icÂ·c. By the mailing of a notice obtained from the Community Development Department. which contains the information de<cribed in Nection 26.304.060(E)(2) ofthe .Â·\spen Land Use Code. At lea31 fifteen (15) day. prior to the public hearing. notice uas hand delivered or mailed hy first clah# postage prepaid U.S. inail to all 0,0 ilers 01' propert> within three hundred (300) fuel ofthe property subject to the development application. The names and addreÂ»e+ 01' property onners shall be those on the current tak records of Pitkin Count> as they appeared no more than sixty (60) days prior to the date of the public hearinu. .1 copv ofthe 01177Â£'/'.0 and governmental a.ve,kie.~ so noticed ix anached hereto. 04 Xeighhor/mod ()1{treitch: Applicant attest, that neighborhood ()lili-each. summarized and attached. wits conducted prior to the first public he:Â·ne a, required in Section 26.304.035. Neighborhood Outreach. .1 copy of ihe neighborhood outreach sununan'. induding die method ofptihlit notitication and a copy 01 unr docunientation thal 11'a.% presented to the public is Litruched lierem. (conmlited on next page ) .. 1\10 Mineral Estate Owner NoticÂ·e. By the certified mailing of notice. return receipt requested. to affected mineral estate ouners hy at least thirt> (30) da> s prior to the date scheduled for the initial pliblic hearing on the application ol development. 1-he names and addresses of niineral estate owners shall be th(he on the current tax records of Pitkin County. At a minimum. Subdi, isions. PI)% thal create more than one lot. and neu Planned Dewlopments are subject to thi>, notice requirement. p'*_ _ Rezoning or text amendment. Whenever the official zoning district map i. iii any way to he changed or amended incidental to or as part of a general re, ision ofth i. 1-itle. or whenever the text of this Title is to be amended, uliether Nueh re, i~ion he made by repeal of this Title and enacunent of a ne\\ land uxe regulation. or otheruise. the requirement of an accurate surzev map or other sullicient legal description 01: and the notice to and libting of nanie~ and addresses of o\#ner# 01 real properly in the area of the propo,ed chanize shall be waized. 1Â·loue,er. the proposed /oning map shall be arailable for public inspection in the planning agenc> during all busine+s hours Ii,r fifteen ( 15) days prior to the public hearinu on #uch amendments. Â»--2- Signature The toretzoing --Al'tidavit of Notice- uas acknowledeed befure me this _23%3> or c/{vi*,1,1 .1014 .hj Sleev W,/30-ri g U 1 1 N E S S M Y I I A \ D A N D ( ) 1 ~ 1 ~ 10 1 A L SEA[ My ctimmission expires: 1 pl~ 70,7 JILL M WAQANIBARAVI NOTARY PUBLIC STATE OF COLORADO . ' NOTARY 10 0 20014019451 MY COMMISSION EXPIRESAUGUST 17 2017 44 Ul.,Ft/6/.15.p/4 6Â¢*9*ti Notar> PubtiF7 U ATTACHMENTM AN APPLICABLE: â€¢COPÂ¥ OF THE Pl BLICATION â€¢PHOTOGRAPH OF THE POSTED NOTICE (SIGN) â€¢ LIST OF THE OH'NERS .liND GOVER.UIENTAL -tGENCIES NOTICED BY Al Afl â€¢ APPLICANT CERTIFIC-iTION OF MINERAL ESTAE OB \ERS NOTICE AS REQURED BÂ¥ C.R.S. Â§24-65.5-103.3 11 4 g 'f Z. 0 . t 1 . 4 -e...10,21 V - . I I . e r.4 t. .,t': IL . ,0*2Ark I- /â€¢r. erÂ»0.â€¢ . I . 4/:. - w 2 0 *t f - . 94:0& 11.12'1,~1, I. I ~442/,-*+ I Â¥ . 4,142-J i '\ I *r r' b. Â®*i / 4 / I 1 /9 +14+7:Tr?t*'r *7**4* If 1 1 ... 4 - f :j *~;,-Â¢4* ,~,*).~ t~~<>46~3.l2~{4 1,~ '' It . -Â« 1 :.â‚¬4* J : =11, t.*. r / ' It '44 2% .% . $7,%1~, 14 2. SU -. 4 -Ft Â¢ i . Â©4 + i 4,.41 - 4 4 -1.44 , t .1 ' 'A I ' Â£ R 2, > Ir I 41â€¢ .- . ' =Er=Jet."L.=I 3 '' * 4. ' Clk I I 6. e 14â€¢1â€¢Jitril A/'24 1 I + f:... 4.%. : . . . I - . I , ., aN . 0/0, 6 . Â£ 4. ..;.' - dill I . ~ 1 . 1 44 4 .-r 3 I + I I 1, e Ill I \: , 4 2 44 $ 'r '* .1 2*kA lik~ 1 *Ar 1, U , . 44**L: . 1* '1 . .0 -- 4124*74* /- .. *imkLY..â‚¬,t-",4 , , TO . 61/ r m ..:.-4. 773* *Al * 3- ..., c . 1, . e .11 2Â¥10 2* 4 I ..9, 4 .4 . 1#UNS#41&15&<'3 1 + 1 0,3~ P, ' ' f /f,E 61,-*'G'. '4~ 1,1,447*1~, AL. IÂ£ -i 9,4 kÂ· 1* > 3' f , 2~ - * ~ ~ ~ * 94/Kfs/ff/J/91 4%.3 1 4*3; f L I 2. . , 16 ty?9 3 &1 . AÂ¥ 3 â‚¬ 4<.tiLÂ¥*'Â· P I 64/ 4 ' I - . 1. ./. 0 Â£.. p,1 4 - 4 1. 4 , d P . 4 - : : 1 - * 4. 1 .Â¥ , 4. ,*79'ft .. . ..Pal. . .5Â¥ - 4. - 2 .E 1% 1. .'/1.f* 3 -ic . ..WIW.1 --- .-0.fl,J ./ ./1: - 12 :9,1.ig''l,>7 eÂ·. tch,7? . â‚¬ 9 A 4'2 , 41:0 I * . ,#7* t - J 'Call . 4 A.-4 P. ::,) :,Â¥; ~ . . ta r -t'L $ ' '.0.5.-L &,4 5 48 \91..... V â€ž r r. I - + 11%9 :l. .. PUBLIC NOTICE RE: 511 LAZY CHAIR RANCH RD - 8040 GREENLINE REVIEW NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that a public hearing will be held on Tuesday. September 9.2014. at a meeting to begin at 4:30 p.m. before the Aspen Planning and Zoning Commission. Sister Cities Meeting Room, City Hall, 130 S. Galena St., Aspen. to consider an application submitted by the Lazy Chair Lot 2 LLC, c/o Millard J. Zimet. RC., 604 W. Main Street, Aspen. CO 81611. represented by Forum Phi Architecture. for the property located at 511 Lazy Chair Ranch Rd. The applicant is requesting 8040 Greenline Review approval for the construction of a single-family home. The property is legally described as Lot 2, Arthur O. Pfister Fully Development Lands Subdivision Exemption, according to the plat thereof recorded April 14. 1993 in Plat Book 42 at Page 45. as Reception No. 4033369. Pitkin County. Colorado. Parcel ID 273511302002. For further information. contact Justin Baker at the City of Aspen Community Development Department. 130 S. Galena St.,Aspen, CO, (970) 429.2797. justin.barker@cityofaspen.com. s/ LJ Erspamer. Chair Aspen Planning and Zoning Commission Published in the Aspen Times on August 21, 2014 City ofAspen Account Easy PeelÂ® labels ~ A I <14*Milim.0 : ~ ~ AVERYÂ® 5160Â® 1 Use Agierve Templale 51608 ,V Flid Pape, - ,*pow, Pop-u,1 Edgeâ„¢ A A CITY OF ASPEN CROSSGATES LLC FIN! FY KATHRYN A 130 S SALENA ST 533 EKÂ·OPKKNS AVE 550 LAZY CHAIR RANCH RD ASFLN, CO 8+6~ 1 ASPEN CO 81611 ASPEN CO 8t611 LAZY CHAIR i OT 2 liC MAROON CREEK CLUB MASTER ASSOC MAHOON CREEK LLC 0133 PROSPECTOR RD#41028 CO JOSHUA AND CO 10 CLUB CIR ASPEN, CO 81611 ]CC S HUNTER ST ASPEN. CO 8 t61 1 ASPEN CO 81611 S&.1 INVESTMENTS l] 4.LC SCHEIDT RUDI E JR 8 CARYN F 2221% L ASAI LF #800 110 120 PFEIFER PL CWCAGO. 4 60601 ASPEN. CO B1G11 EtiquetteÂ·% fo,rE|01 21 11â€¢ler , A : Rm,N+* A la harmure .fin de ~ www.a,refy.com r 15,0,14 80, Util:ce: le gabarit AVFRY'ri El frif# *evoin 1# rebiyfi Pop.uâ€¢,il- I 1-800-50-AVERY chagement , 1 .. RECEPTION#: 611208, 06/18/2014 at 01:13:06 PM, 1 OF 4, R $26.00 Doc Code ORDINANCE Janice K. Vos Caudill, Pitkin County, CO ORDINANCE N0.12 (SERIES OF 2014) AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF ASPEN CITY COUNCIL APPROVING A MINOR SUBDIVISION AMENDMENT AND AN AMENDMENT TO THE ANNEXATION AGREEMENT FOR THE ARTHUR O. PFISTER SUBDIVISION LOTS 2 AND 3, CITY OF ASPEN, PITKIN COUNTY, COLORADO. Parcel ID Lot 2: 2735-113-02-002 Parcel ID Lot 3: 2735-113-02-003 WHEREAS, the Community Development Department received an application for the properties known as Lots 2 and 3, Arthur O. Pfister Subdivision Exemption, located at 511 Lazy Chair Lane; Aspen, Colorado, from owners Lazy Chair Lot 2, LLC; and, Lazy Chair Lot 3, LLC, represented by Steev Wilson of Forum Phi Architects; and, WHEREAS, the application seeks to amend the Subdivision approval granted by Pitkin County prior to annexation of the property into the City of Aspen and amend the annexation agreement with the City of Aspen, both of which set forth certain development allowances and restrictions; and, WHEREAS, the properties were annexed into the City of Aspen by the adoption of Ordinance 34, Series 1996, which ordinance accepted certain development allowances and restrictions placed on the property by Pitkin County; and WHEREAS, the properties were also subject of a Water Service Agreement with the City of Aspen (an exhibit to Ordinance 40, Series 1996) which agreement specified certain development allowances and restrictions; and, WHEREAS, pursuant to Section 26.480.090, City Council may approve minor amendments to an existing subdivision approval; and, WHEREAS, pursuant to Section 26.304, the City Council may amend the provisions of a previously adopted ordinance, specifically Ordinance No. 40, Series 1996; and, WHEREAS, the Community Development Department received referral comments from City Engineering, Building Department, Fire Protection District, Parks Department, and City Utilities as a result of the Development Review Committee meeting; and, WHEREAS, the Aspen City Council has reviewed and considered the development proposal under the applicable provisions of the Municipal Code as identified herein, opened a duly noticed public hearing, considered the Application, received presentation from the Applicant, considered the comments and recommendations of the Community Development Director, considered comments and recommendations from other members of City staff and referral agencies, considered comments and suggestions offered by members of the public, considered question responses by staff and the Applicant, considered comments and discussion by fellow Council members; and, WHEREAS, the Aspen City Council finds that the development proposal with certain conditions attached meets or exceeds all applicable development standards of all applicable land use reviews as identified herein; and, Ordinance No. 12, Series 2014. Page 1 of 4 WHEREAS, the Aspen City Council finds that this ordinance furthers and is necessary for the promotion of public health, safety, and welfare. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ASPEN, COLORADO, as follows: An amendment to the Arthur O. Pfister Subdivision Exemption, Lots 2 and 3, and an amendment to the development provisions of the water service agreement for the Lots are hereby approved with the following conditions of approval: Section 1: Applicability of City Development Requirements The allowances and limitations for the development of Lots 2 and 3 approved by Pitkin County and contained within City of Aspen Ordinance No. 40, Series 1996; the provisions of the water service agreement related to development allowances and limitations; the subdivision plat approved by Pitkin County and recorded at Book 42 Page 45; and, previous land use approvals granted by Pitkin County including all finding, interpretations, and amendments shall be considered voided upon recordation of the Subdivision Amendment Plat. Lots 2 and 3 shall remain subdivided lots within the City of Aspen, each with one development right, and shall allow development in accordance with the City of Aspen development allowances and limitations including, but not limited to, the City of Aspen Land Use Code, the Rural Residential (RR) zone district as may be amended from time to time or as the property may be otherwise rezoned to another district, the Urban Runoff Management Plan, and applicable building and fire codes. The provisions of the water service agreement and the City's standards and requirements pertaining to the delivery of potable water to the properties shall be unaffected by this Ordinance. Lot 2 shall be subject to an 8040 Greenline Review, pursuant to Chapter 26.435 of the City's Land Use Code as said Chapter may be amended from time to time. Lot 3 is not within the 8040 Greenline area and is not subject to this review. The developer of both lots shall work with the City of Aspen Parks Department to minimize disturbance to native vegetation and preserve groupings of the native Gambrel Oak. Section 2: Plat Filing Pursuant to Chapter 26.490 - Approval Documents. the record owners of Lots 2 and 3 shall prepare and submit a Subdivision Amendment Plat to be reviewed to ensure each item and condition of approval is documented to the satisfaction of the Community Development Director, the City Engineer, and the City Attorney prior to final signatures by the Mayor and recordation. A Development Agreement is not needed. The Subdivision Amendment Plat shall grant a perpetual 30-foot wide access easement through Lot 3 for the purposes of providing adequate access to Lot 2. The easement shall be generally along the alignment of the existing driveway. The subdivision plat shall contain a note prohibiting development above the 8060-foot elevation line on Lot 2, except as reasonable necessary for utility infrastructure, storm water mitigation, maintenance or restoration of native landscape, and wildfire mitigation needs. Ordinance No. 12, Series 2014. Page 2 of 4 .. The subdivision plat shall contain a note prohibiting development below the golf cart path on Lot 3, except as reasonable necessary for utility infrastructure, storm water mitigation, maintenance or restoration o f native landscape, and wildfire mitigation needs. Section 3: Zoning Man Correction The Community Development Director shall cause the Official Zone District map to reflect Lots 1, 2, and 3 of the Pfister Subdivision as located in the Rural Residential (RR) Zone District without a Planned Development Overlay. The map incorrectly indicates this overlay. Section 4: Representations Preserved All material representations and commitments made by the Applicant pursuant to the development proposal approvals as herein awarded, whether in public hearing or documentation presented before the Community Development Department or the Aspen City Council are hereby incorporated in such plan development approvals and the same shall be complied with as if fully set forth herein, unless amended by other specific conditions, Section 5: Vested Rights The development approvals granted herein shall constitute a site-specific development plan vested for a period of three (3) years from the date of issuance of a development order. Ilowever, any failure to abide by any of the terms and conditions attendant to this approval shall result in the forfeiture of said vested property rights. Unless otherwise exempted or extended, failure to properly submit all plats and agreements required to be recorded, as specified herein, within one year of the effective date of the development order shall also result in the forfeiture of said vested property rights and shall render the development order void within the meaning of Section 26.104.050 (Void permits). Zoning that is not part of the approved site-specific development plan shall not result in the creation of a vested property right. No later than fourteen (14) days following final approval of all requisite reviews necessary to obtain a development order as set forth in this Ordinance, the City Clerk shall cause to be published in a newspaper of general circulation within the jurisdictional boundaries of the City of Aspen, a notice advising the general public of the approval of a site specific development plan and creation of a vested property right pursuant to this Title. Such notice shall be substantially in the following form: Notice is hereby given to the general public of the approval of a site specific development plan, and the creation of a vested property right, valid for a period of three (3) years, pursuant to the Land Use Code of the City of Aspen and Title 24, Article 68, Colorado Revised Statutes, pertaining to the following described properly: First Amendment to the Arthur O. Pfister Fully Developed Lands Subdivision Lots 2 and 3, City of Aspen, Pitkin County Colorado, as more fully described in City of Aspen City Council Ordinance No. , Series 2014. Nothing in this approval shall exempt the development order from subsequent reviews and approvals required by this approval of the general rules, regulations and ordinances or the City of Aspen provided that such reviews and approvals are not inconsistent with this approval. The approval granted hereby shall be subject to all rights of referendum and judicial review; the period of time permitted by law for the exercise of such rights shall not begin to run until the Ordinance No. 12, Series 2014. Page 3 of 4 ...,*....#*#*..W...96&.0%~0**9*Â¥%**%Â»#*ER#**ej'i"'-**'%-I'**"m**VIB'"#'.--V-Iwiilim,%-*.--*g'*,"m//Nmp0'*)&-%' date of publication of the notice of final development approval as required under Section 26.304.070(A). The rights of referendum shall be limited as set forth in the Colorado Constitution and the Aspen Home Rule Charter. Section 6: This Ordinance shall not affect any existing litigation and shall not operate as an abatement of any action or proceeding now pending under or by virtue of the ordinances repealed or amended as herein provided, and the same shall be conducted and concluded under such prior ordinances. Section 7: If any section, subsection, sentence, clause, phrase, or portion of this Ordinance is for any reason held invalid or unconstitutional in a court of competent jurisdiction, such portion shall be deemed a separate, distinct and independent provision and shall not affect the validity of the remaining portions thereof. Section 8: That the City Clerk is directed, upon the adoption of this Ordinance, to record a copy of this Ordinance in the office of the Pitkin County Clerk and Recorder. Section 9: A public hearing on the Ordinance was held on the 27th day of May. 2014, at 5:00 in the City Council Chambers, City hall, 130 South Galena Street, Aspen Colorado, fifteen (15) days prior to which hearing a public notice of the same was published in a newspaper of general circulation within the City o f Aspen. Section 20: This ordinance shall become effective thirty (30) days following final adoption. INTRODUCED, READ AND ORDERED PUBLISHED as provided by law, by the City Council ofthe City of Aspen on the 12th day of May, 2014. , A Att -Â· Of {-~- fi C 7- I l/\UW~fi 1~34(MA 1 i f Sken Strlron, 4ay~_ Linda Manning, City Clerk FINALLY, adopted, passed and approved this 2701 day of May, 2014. Atte,t: C f. \U" 1 TAL 2 4 Â¥i;ida Manning, City Clerk < Ste*n Sk:Aron, Mayor Approved as to form: EL- 6.-1 -- ~14~es R. True, City Attorney Ordinance No, 12, Series 2014. Page 4 of 4 .. THE CrrY oF AspEN Land Use Application Determination of Completeness Date: July 29,2014 Dear City of Aspen Land Use Review Applicant, We have received your land use application and reviewed it for completeness. The case number and name assigned to this property is 0062.2014.ASLU-8040 Greenline review, 511 Lazy Chirt. Justin Barker will be the planner for the land use case. J Your Land Use Application is incomplete: Please submit the following missing submission items so that we may begin reviewing your application. No review hearings will be scheduled until all of the submission contents listed above have been submitted and are to the satisfaction of the City of Aspen Planner reviewing the land use application. ~T~ Your Land Use Application is complete: ~ '~ If there are not missing items listed above, then your application has been deemed complete to begin the land use review process. Other submission items may be requested throughout the review process as deemed necessary by the Community Development Department. Please contact me at 429-2759 if you have any questions. Th~lk-You, C M.Â»2)4 L '>edifer P]~eldh, Deputy Planning Director City of Aspe< Community Development Department For Office Use Only: Qualifying Applications: Mineral Rights Notice Required New SPA New PUD Yes No >2 Subdivision, SPA, or PUD (creating more than 1 additional lot) GMQS Allotmepts Residential Affordable Housing Yes No-~Ii Commercial E.P.F. Lodging 0%2 2014.Â»LU RECEIVED 1 6- tz JUL 1 4 2014 Forum Phi 715 W Main St, Ste 204 CITY OF ASPEN Aspen, CO 81611 COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT P: (970) 279-4157 F: (866) 770-5585 1405 - 511 Lazy Chair Road, Lot 2 - 8040 Greenline Review Land Use Application 2014/07/10 Section Title Pg(S) 1 Completed Land Use Application 1-7,9-11 Review criteria response to attachment 4 8 Draft of Public Notice Agreement 12-13 Signed fee agreement 14-15 11 Pre-application Conference Summary 16-18 Ill Total deposit forreview of the application 19 IV Street address and legal description of parcel 20 V Applicant's name (Deed & Title) 21-22, 23-35 Consent and Authorization to Represent 36 VI 1St Amendment Final Plat, Site Improvement Surveys See plan set VII HOA Compliance Form 37 Letter from the HOA regarding Schematic Design Approval 38-41 Vlll Written description of the proposal See pg 8, #7 VI111 Written responses to all review criteria 42-44 X Vicinity map with adjacent properties list 45-46 10 Copies of the complete application packet and associated drawings A digital copy of the application provided in pdf file format - Enclosed thumb drive A 3D file will be presented at the public hearing Â¥ 1 Sol L._S REPowr K il H AZA eD-5 12,Efolcr RECEIVED JUI &Â¥2014 â‚¬. CITY OF ASPEN COMMI INT'i DEVELOPENT 1.1 .. CITY OF AsPEN COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT GENERAL LAND USE APPLICATION PACKET THE Cln OF Abl'EN Attached is an Application for review of Development that requires Land Use Review pursuant to the City of Aspen Land Use Code. Included in this package are the following attachments: 1. Development Application Fee Policy, Fee Schedule and Agreement for Payment Form 2. Land Use Application Form 3. Dimensional Requirements Form 4. Matrix of Land Use Application Requirements/Submittal Requirements Key 5. General Summary of Your Application Process 6. Public Hearing Notice Requirements 7. Affidavit ofNotice All applications are reviewed based on the criteria established in Title 26 ofthe Aspen Municipal Code. Title 26 ofthe Aspen Municipal Code is available at the City Clerk's Office on the second floor of City Hall and on the internet at www.aspenpitkin.com, City Departments, City Clerk, Municipal Code, and search Title 26. We strongly encourage all applicants to hold a pre-application conference with a Planner in the Community Development Department so that the requirements for submitting a complete application can be fully described. Also, depending upon the complexity of the development proposed, submitting one copy of the development application to the Case Planner to determine accuracy, insu fficiencies, or redundancies can reduce the overall cost of materials and Staff time. Please recognize that review of these materials does not substitute for a complete review of the Aspen Land Use Regulations. While this application package attempts to summarize the key provisions ofthe Code as they apply to your type of development, it cannot possibly replicate the detail or the scope of the Code. If you have questions which are not answered by the materials in this package, we suggest that you contact the staff member assigned to your case or consult the applicable sections of the Aspen Land Use Regulations. 1 0062. /#{4. ASLU ATTACHMENT 2 -LAND USE APPLICATION RECEIVED JUI 9 E 09. i Name: ARTHUR O PFISTER EXEMPTION Lot: 2 Ci J Â¥ Or Ao PEN Location: 511 Lazy Chair Road, Aspen CO 81611 CCIA~1011,111.v art m APMEN'i (Indicate street address, lot & block number, legal description where appropriate) Parcel ID # (REQUIRED) 273511302002 APPLICANT: Name: LAZY CHAIR LOT 2 LLC - C/O Forum Phi Address: 715 W Main Street, Suite 204 Aspen, CO 81611 970-279-4109 - Steev Wilson Phone #: REPRESENTATIVE: Name: Millard Zimet Address: 604 W Main St Aspen, CO 81611 970-925-9009 Phone #: TYPE OF APPLICATION: (please check all that apply): D GMQS Exemption U Conceptual PUD U Temporary Use U GMQS Allotment U Final PUD (& PUD Amendment) U Text/Map Amendment U Special Review U Subdivision U Conceptual SPA ~ ESA -8040 Greenline, Stream U Subdivision Exemption (includes U Final SPA (& SPA Margin, Hallam Lake Bluff, condominiumization) Amendment) Mountain View Plane U Commercial Design Review U Lot Split El Small Lodge Conversion/ Expansion U Residential Design Variance U Lot Line Adjustment U Other: ~ Conditional Use EXISTING CONDITIONS: (description of existing buildings, uses, previous approvals, etc.) Existing single family residence, to be demolished for redevelopement. 0025.2014.ASLU - 511 Lazy Chair Dr., Minor Subdivision Amendment PROPOSAL: (description ofproposed buildings, uses, modifications, etc.) Proposed approval of 8040 Greenline Land Use Review for new construction of single family residence Have you attached the following? FEES DUE: $ 4490 Â® Pre-Application Conference Summary Â® Attachment #1, Signed Fee Agreement 3 Response to Attachment #3, Dimensional Requirements Form 02 Response to Attachment #4, Submittal Requirements- Including Written Responses to Review Standards U 3-D Model for large project All plans that are larger than 8.5" X 11" must be folded. A disk with an electric copy of all written text (Microsoft Word Format) must be submitted as part of the application. Large scale projects should include an electronic 3-D model. Your pre-application conference summary will indicate if you must submit a 3-D model. 2 0 0 ATTACHMENT 3 DIMENSIONAL REQUIREMENTS FORM Project: 511 Lazy Chair Road, Lot 2 Applicant: Lazy Chair Lot 2 LLC - C/O Forum Phi Location: 511 Lazy Chair Road Zone District: RR Lot Size: 2.4 Acres Lot Area: 55.740.4 SF ( for the purposes of calculating Floor Area, Lot Area may be reduced for areas within the high water mark, easements, and steep slopes. Please refer to the definition of Lot Area in the Municipal Code.) Commercial net leasable: Existing: N/A Proposed: N/A Number of residential units: Exist irig: Single Proposed: Single Number ofbedrooms: Existing: 7 BR Proposed: 9 BR Proposed % of demolition (Historic properties only): DIMENSIONS: Floor Areat Existing: 3523 SPAilowable: 6714.8 SEProposed: 5710 SP Principal bldg. height: Existing: 22 FT Allowable: 28 FT Proposed: 25 n Access. bldg. height: Existing. N/A Allowable: 28 FT Proposed: NIA On-Site parking: 2+ 2 3+ % Site coverage: Existing: NA Proposed: NIA NIA Required: No No NO 51 Open Space: Existi/ig:Requirement Required: Requirement Proposed.Requirement Front Setback: Existing: NIA Required: 30 Ft Proposed: 30 FT Rear Setback: Existing: NIA Required: 20 PT Proposed: 20 FT Combined FIR: Existing: N/A Required: 50 FT Proposed: 50 FT Side Setback: Existing: NA Required: 20 FT Proposed: 20 FT Side Setback: Existing: NIA Required: 20 PT Proposed: 20 FT Combined Sides: Existing: NIA Required: 40 FT Proposed: 40 FT Distance Between Existing No Requirement Required. Proposed: No Requirement No Requirement Buildings Existing non-conformities or encroachments: None None Variations requested: 3 ATTACHMENT 4- MATRIX OF LAND USE APPLICATION REQUIREMENTS For application requirements, refer to the numbers in the in second column. These numbers correspond to the key on page 9. For multiple reviews. do not duplicate information. All application materials must be complete and submitted in collated packets. All drawings must include an accurate graphic scale Type of Review App. Submission Requirements Process Type (See Process Number of Required Submittal (See key on page 9.) Description in Att.5) Packets 8040 GREENLINE REVIEW 1-7,8-10,35 P& Z 10 8040 GREENLINE EXEMPTION 1-7,8-10,35 ADMINISTRATIVE REVIEW 2 STREAM MARGIN REVIEW 1-7,8,10,11,12,35 2 for 0 Admin., 10 for P &Z STREAM 1MARGIN EXEMPTION 1-7,8,10,11,12,35 ADMINISTRATIVE REVIEW 2 . HALLAM LAKE BLUFF REVIEW' 1-7,13,14,35 P& Z 10 MOUNTAIN VIEW PLANE 1-7,15,16,35 P& Z 10 CONDITIONAL USE 1-7,9,17 P& Z 10 SPECIAL REVIEW* 1-7, Additional Submission Reg. depend P& Z 10 on nature of the Special Re, iew Request. SUBDIVISION 1-7,18,19,20,21,35 P & Z, AND CITY COUNCIL 20 EXEMPT SUBDIVISION 1-7,18,19,20,21,35 CITY COUNCIL 10 LOT LINE ADJUSTMENT 1-7,22 ADMINISTRATIVE REVIEW 2 LOT SPLIT 1-7,22 CITY COUNCIL 10 CODE AMENDMENT 1-4,7,23 P & Z, AND CITY COUNCIL 20 WIRELESS TELECOM. 1-7,16,24,25,26,27,35 ADMIN. OR P&Z 2 for Admin., 10 for P&Z SATELITE DISH OVER 24" IN 1-7 ADMIN. OR P&Z 2 for Admin., 10 for P&Z DIAMETER RES. DESIGN STANDARDS 1-7,9,28,29,30 P & Z OR DRAC 10 VARIANCE GMQS EXEMPTION* 1-7, Additional Submission Reg. depend ADMIN.,OR P & Z, AND/OR CC 2 for Admin., 10 for P & Z, 20 for P on nature of the Exemption Request. (BASED ON EXEMPTION TYPE) & Z and CC CONDOMINIUMIZATION 1,31 ADMINISTRATIVE 2 PUD 1-7,32,33,35 CONCEPTUAL -P&Z, AND CC 20 for P&Z and CC (Submit FINAL -P&Z, AND CC Separately for Final PUD Review) LODGE PRESERVATION PUD 1-7,35 P & Z, AND CC 20 4 PUD AMENDMENT 1-7 ADMIN., OR P & Z, AND/OR CC 2 for Admin., 10 for P & Z, 20 for P (BASED ON AMENDMENT TYPE) & Z and CC SPECIALLY PLANNED AREA 1-7,35 CONCEPTUAL -P&Z, AND CC 20 for P&Z and CC (Submit (SPA) FINAL- P & Z, AND CC Separately for Final SPA) AMENDMENT TO SPA 1-7 ADMIN.,OR P &ZAND CC 2 for Admin., 20 for P&Z and CC (BASED ON SIGNIFICANCE OF AMENDMENT) TEMPORARY USE 1-7 ADMIN. OR CC (BASED ON 2 for Admin., 10 fur City Council DURATION TIME) ACCESSORY DWELLING UNIT 1-7,9 ADMIN OR P &*BASED ON IF 2 for Administrative Review THE PROPOSAL MEETS REVIEW ~ STANDARDS) REZONING 1-7 P & Z AND CC 20 DIMENSIONAL REQUIREMENTS 1-7,34 BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT 9 VARIANCE * Consult with a Planner about submittal requirements. ** A pre-application conference with a Planner should be conducted prior to submitting any land use application. Please call 920-5090 to schedule a pre-application conference. 5 .. ATTACHMENT 4-CONT'D- SUBMITTAL KEY 1 Land ['se Application with 12. Accurate elevations (in relation to system in the area of the proposed Applicant's name. address and telephone mean sea level) of the lowest floor. subdivision. The contents of the plat shall number. contained within a letter signed including basement. of all neu or be of sufficient detail to determine by the applicant stating the name. address. substantially improved structures: a whether the proposed subdivision will and telephone number of the verification and recordation of the actual meet the design standards pursuant to representative authorized to act on behalf elevation in relation to mean sea level to Land Use Code Section 26.480.060(3).20. o f the applicant. which any structure is constructed: a Subdivision GIS Data. demonstration that all new construction or 2. The street address and legal substantial improvements will be 21. A landscape plan showing location. description of the parcel on which anchored to prevent ilotation. collapse or size, and type of proposed landscape development is proposed to occur. lateral movement of any structure to be features. constructed or improved. a demonstration 3. A disclosure of ownership of the that the structure will have the lowest 22 A subdivision plat which meets the parcel on which development is proposed floor. including basement. elevated to at terms of this chapter. and con forms to the to occur. consisting of a current certificate least two (2) feet above the base flood requirements of this title indicating that no from a title insurance company. or elevation. all as certified by a registered further subdivision may be granted for attorney licensed to practice m the State of these lots nor will additional units be built Colorado. listing the names of all owners uÂ·ithout receipt of applicable approvals of the property, and all mortgages. 13. A landscape plan that includes pursuant to this chapter and growth judgments, liens. easements. contracts and native vegetative screening of no less than management allocation pursuant to agreements affecting the parcel. and fifty (50) percent of the development as Chapter 26.470. demonstrating the owner's right to apply viewed from the rear (slope) of the parcel. for the Development Application. All vegetative screening shall be 23. The precise wording of an, maintained in perpetuity and shall be proposed amendment. 4. An 8 1/2" x 11" vicinity map locating replaced with the same or comparable the subject parcel within the City of material should it die. 24. Site Plan or plans drawn to a scale of Aspen. one ( 1") inch equals ten (10') feet or one 14- Site xections drawn by a registered (1") inch equals twenty (20') feet. 5. A site improvement survey including architect. landscape architect, or including before and "after ' photographs topography and vegetation showing the engineer shall be submitted showing all (simulations) specifying the location of current status of the parcel certified by a existing and proposed site elements. the antemas. support structures. transmission registered land surveyor. licensed in the top of slope. and pertinent elevations buildings and,/or other acceÂ»ory uses. State of Colorado. (This requirement, or above sea level. access. parking, fences. signs. lighting. any part thereof. may be waived by the landscaped areas and all adjacent land Community Development Department if 15. Proposed elevations ofthe uses within one-hundred fifty (150') feet. the project is determined not to warrant a development. including any rooftop Such plans and drawings should survey document.) equipment and how it will be screened. demonstrate compliance with the Review Standards of this Section. 6. A site plan depicting the proposed 16. Proposed elerations of the layout and tlie project's physical de,Â·elopment. including any rooftop 25. FAA and FC'C Coordination. relationship to the land and it's equipment and how it will be screened. Statements regarding the regulations of surroundings. the Federal ArÂ·iation Administration 17. A sketch plan ofthe site showing (FAA) and the Federal Coinmunications 7. A written description of the existing and proposed features which are Commission (FCC). proposal and a written explanation of relevant to the review. how a proposed development complies 26. Structural Integrity Report from a with the re,Â·iew standards relevant to the 18. One ( 1) inch equals four hundred professional engineer licensed in the development application. (400) feet scale city map showing the State of Colorado. location of the proposed subdiiÂ·ision, all 8. Plan with Existing and proposed adjacent lands owned by or under option 27. Evidence that an effort was made to grades at two-foot contours. with five-foot to the applicant. commonly known locate on an existing wireless intenÂ·als for grades over ten ( 10) percent. landmarks. and the zone district in which telecommunication services facility the proposed subdivision and adjacent site including coverage/ interference 9. Proposed elevations o f the de,Â·elopinent properties are located. analysib and capacity analysis and a brie f statement as to other reasons for 10. A description of proposed 19. A plat which reflects the layout of success or no success. construction techniques to be used. the lots. blocks and structures in the proposed subdivision. The plat shall 28. Neighborhood block plan at 11. A Plan with the 100-year floodplain be drawn at a scale of one (1) equals one 1"=50' (ar ailable from City Engineering line and the high water line. hundred (100) feet or larger. Architectural Department) Graphically show the front scales are not acceptable. Sheet size shall portions of all existing buildings on both be twenty-four (24) inches by thirty-six sides of the block and their setback from (36) inches. If it is necessary to place the the street iii feet. Identify parking and plat on more than a one ( 1) sheet. an index front entry for each building and locate shall be included on the first sheet. A any accessory dwelling units along the vicinity map shall also appear on the first alley. (Continued on neit page.) sheet showing the subdivision as it relates to the rest of the city and the street 6 .. Indicate whether any portions of the 35. Exterior Lighting Plan. Show the houses immediately adjacent to the location. height. type and luminous subject parcel are one story (only one intensity of each abo~Â·e grade fixture. living level). Estimate the site illumination as measured in foot candles and include minimum. 29 Roof Plan. inaximum and arÂ·erage illumination. Additionally, provide comparable 30 Photographic panorama. Show examples already in the community that elevations of all buildings on both sides o f demonstrate technique. specification. and/ the block. including present condition of or light level if they exist. the subject property. Label photos and mount on a presentation board 31. A condominium subdivision exemption plat drawn with permanent ink on reproducible mylar. Sheet size shall be twenty-four (24) inches by thirty-six (36) inches u ith an unencumbered margin of one and one-half (1 1/2) inches on the left hand side of the sheet and a one-half (1/2) inch margin around the other three (3) sides of the sheet pursuant to Land Use Code Section 26.480.090, 32. A description and site plan of the proposed de,Â·elopment including a statement of the objectives to be achieved by the PUD and a description of the proposed land uses, densities. natural features. traffic and pedestrian circulation. off-street parking, open space areas. infrastructure improvements. and site drainage. 33 An architectural character plan generally indicating the use. massing, scale. and orientation of the proposed buildings. 34. A written description of the val-lance being requested. 7 .. 511 Lazy Chair Lot: 2 - 8040 Greenline Review Criteria Response to Land Use Application, attachment 4 1. Land Use Application, enclosed pages 1-15 2. Arthur O Pfister Exemption, 511 Lazy Chair Road, Parcel # 273511302002 3. Disclosure ofownership, enclosed pages 21-22 4. Vicinity Map, enclosed page 45 5. Site Improvement Survey, Historical Survey, and 1 v Amendment to Final Plat, enclosed within drawing set 6. Site Plans - Existing, see Zl-005, Proposed, see Zl-011 7. This application for 8040 Greenline Review demonstrates our calculation of net lot area through the historical grade survey provided by Colorado licensed surveyor. This lot is not affected by many intents of the 8040 Greenline Review. This lot is on a stand alone knoll, outside o f dangers such as debris flow, substantial surface water run-off, ground stability, and/or avalanche conditions. Utility services are present at site and will require upgrades from existing conditions, requiring minimal i f any off site disturbance. 8. Plan with existing and proposed grading, see Z1 -014 9. Proposed Elevations of the development, see Zl-015-017 10. Proposed construction techniques will include: cast in place concrete foundation, steel and concrete floor and wall structures, and traditional residential infill walls. 35. Exterior Lighting Plan, see Zl-012. Cut sheets are referenced in plan set pg Zl-013 8 .. ATTACHMENT 5 DEVELOPMENT REVIEW PROCEDURE 1. Attend pre-application conference. During this one-on-one meeting, staff will determine the review process which applies to your development proposal and will identify the materials necessary to review your application. 2. Submit Development Application. Based on your pre-application meeting, you should respond to the application package and submit the requested number of copies of the complete application and the appropriate processing fee to the Community Development Department. 3. Determination of Completeness. Within five working days of the date of your submission, staff will review the application, and will notify you in writing whether the application is complete or if additional materials are required. Please be aware that the purpose of the completeness review is to determine whether or not the information you have submitted is adequate to review the request, and not whether the information is sufficient to obtain approval. 4. Staff Review of Development Application. Once your application is determined to be complete, it will be reviewed by the staff for compliance with the applicable standards of the Code. During the staff review stage, the application will be referred to other agencies for comments. The Planner assigned to your case or the agency may contact you if additional information is needed or if problems are identified. A memo will be written by the staff member for signature by the Community Development Director. The memo will explain whether your application complies with the Code and will list any conditions which should apply if the application is to be approved. Final approval of any Development Application which amends a recorded document, such as a plat, agreement or deed restriction, will require the applicant to prepare an amended version of that document for review and approval by staff. Staff will provide the applicant with the applicable contents for the revised plat, while the City Attorney is normally in charge of the form for recorded agreements and deed restrictions. We suggest that you not go to the trouble or expense of preparing these documents until the staff has determined that your application is eligible for the requested amendment or exemption. 5. Board Review of Application. I f a public hearing is required for the land use action that you are requesting, then the Planning Staff will schedule a hearing date for the application upon determination that the Application is complete. The hearing(s) will be scheduled before the appropriate reviewing board(s). The Applicant will be required to mail notice (one copy provided by the Community Development Department) to property owners within 300 feet of the subject property and post notice (sign available at the Community Development Department) of the public hearing on the site at least fifteen (15) days prior to the hearing date (please see Attachment 6 for instructions). The 9 .. Planning Staff will publish notice of the hearing in the paper for land use requests that require publication. The Planning Staff will then formulate a recommendation on the land use request and draft a memo to the reviewing board(s). Staff will supply the Applicant with a copy of the Planning Staffs memo approximately 5 days prior to the hearing. The public hearing(s) will take place before the appropriate review boards. Public Hearings include a presentation by the Planning Staff, a presentation by the Applicant (optional), consideration of public comment, and the reviewing board's questions and decision. 6. Issuance of Development Order. If the land use review is approved, then the Planning Staff will issue a Development Order which allows the Applicant to proceed into Building Permit Application. 7. Receipt of Building Permit. Once you have received a copy of the signed staff approval, you may proceed to building permit review. During this time, your project will be examined for its compliance with the Uniform Building Code. It will also be checked for compliance with applicable provisions of the Land Use Regulations which were not reviewed in detail during the one step review (this might include a check of floor area ratios, setbacks, parking, open space and the like). Fees for water, sewer, parks and employee housing will be collected if due. Any document required to be recorded, such as a plat, deed restriction or agreement, will need to be reviewed and recorded before a Building Permit is submitted. 10 .. ATTACHMENT 6 PUBLIC HEARING NOTICING REQUIREMENTS Three forms of notice are required by the Aspen Land Use Regulations: publication in the newspaper, posting of the property, and mailing to surrounding landowners. Following is a summary ofthe notice requirements, including identification of who is responsible for completing the notice. 1. Publication - Publication of notice in a paper of general circulation in the City of Aspen is to be done at least fifteen (15) days prior to the hearing. The legal notice will be written by the Community Development Department and we will place the notice in the paper within the appropriate deadline. 2. Posting - Posting of a sign in a conspicuous place on the property is to be done fifteen (15) days prior to the hearing. It is the applicant's responsibility to obtain a copy of the sign from the Community Development Department, to fill it in correctly and to bring proofto the hearing that posting took place (use attached affidavit). 3. Mailing - Mailing of notice is to be made to all owners of property within 300 feet of the subject development parcel by the applicant. It is the applicant's responsibility to obtain a copy of the notice from the Community Development Department, to mail it according to the following standards, and to bring proof to the hearing that the mailing took place (use attached affidavit). Notice to mineral Estate Owner. An Applicant for surface Development shall notify affected mineral estate owners by at least thirty (30) days prior to the date scheduled for the initial public hearing on the application for development. The applicant shall certify that the notice has been provided to the mineral estate owners. The names and addresses of property owners shall be those on the current tax records of Pitkin County as they appeared no more than sixty (60) days prior to the date of public hearing. 11 .. AFFIDAVIT OF PUBLIC NOTICE REQUIRED BY SECTION 26.304.060 (E), ASPEN LAND USE CODE ADDRESS OF PROPERTY: 511 Lazy Chair Road , Aspen, CO SCHEDULED PUBLIC HEARING DATE: , 20- STATE OF COLORADO ) ) SS. County of Pitkin ) I Steev Wilson (name, please print) being or representing an Applicant to the City of Aspen, Colorado, hereby personally certify that I have complied with the public notice requirements of Section 26.304.060 (E) of the Aspen Land Use Code in the following manner: Publication of notice: By the publication in the legal notice section of an official paper or a paper of general circulation in the City of Aspen at least fifteen (15) days prior to the public hearing. A copy of the publication is attached hereto. Posting of notice: By posting of notice, which form was obtained from the Community Development Department, which was made of suitable, waterproof materials, which was not less than twenty-two (22) inches wide and twenty-six (26) inches high, and which was composed of letters not less than one inch in height. Said notice was posted at least fifteen (15) days prior to the public hearing on the day of , 20 , to and including the date and time of the public hearing. A photograph of the posted notice (sign) is attached hereto. Mailing of notice. By the mailing of a notice obtained from the Community Development Department, which contains the information described in Section 26.304.060(E)(2) of the Aspen Land Use Code. At least fifteen (15) days prior to the public hearing, notice was hand delivered or mailed by first class postage prepaid U.S. mail to all owners of property within three hundred (300) feet of the property subject to the development application. The names and addresses of property owners shall be those on the current tax records of Pitkin County as they appeared no more than sixty (60) days prior to the date of the public hearing. A copy of the owners and govenimemal agencies so noticed is attached hereto. Neighborhood Outreach: Applicant attests that neighborhood outreach, summarized and attached, was conducted prior to the first public hearing as required in Section 26.304.035, Neighborhood Outreach. A copy of the neighborhood outreach summary, including the method Of public notification enid a copy of any documentation that was presented to the public is attached hereto. (continued 011 next page) 12 .. Mineral Estate 01wier Notice. By the certified mailing of notice, return receipt requested, to affected mineral estate owners by at least thirty (30) days prior to the date scheduled for the initial public hearing on the application of development. The names and addresses of mineral estate owners shall be those on the current tax records of Pitkin County. At a minimum, Subdivisions, SPAs or PUDs that create more than one lot, new Planned Unit Developments, and new Specially Planned Areas, are subject to this notice requirement. Rezoning or text amendment. Whenever the official zoning district map is in any way to be changed or amended incidental to or as part of a general revision of this Title, or whenever the text of this Title is to be amended, whether such revision be made by repeal of this Title and enactment of a new land use regulation, or otherwise, the requirement of an accurate survey map or other sufficient legal description of, and the notice to and listing of names and addresses of owners of real property in the area of the proposed change shall be waived. However, the proposed zoning map shall be available for public inspection in the planning agency during all business hours for fifteen ( 15) days prior to the public hearing on such amendments. Signature The foregoing "Affidavit of Notice" was acknowledged before me this day of , 20 , by WITNESS MY HAND AND OFFICIAL SEAL My commission expires: Notary Public ATTACHMENTS AS APPLICABLE: â€¢ COPY OF THE PUBLICATION â€¢ PHOTOGRAPH OF THE POSTED NOTICE (SIGN) â€¢ LIST OF THE OWNERS AND GOVERNMENTAL AGENCIES NOTICED BY MAIL â€¢ APPLICANT CERTIFICATION OF MINERAL ESTAE OWNERS NOTICE AS REQUIRED BY C.R.S. Â§24-65.5-103.3 13 .. Land Use Review Fee Policy The City of Aspen has established a review fee policy for the processing of land use applications. A flat fee or deposit is collected for land use applications based on the type of application submitted. A flat fee is collected by Community Development for applications which normally take a minimal and predictable amount of staff time to process. Review fees for other City departments reviewing the application (referral departments) will also be collected when necessary. Flat fees are cumulative - meaning an application with multiple flat fees must pay the sum of those flat fees. Flat fees are not refundable. A review fee deposit is collected by Community Development when more extensive staff review is required. Actual staff time spent will be charged against the deposit. Various City staff may also charge their time spent on the case in addition to the case planner. Deposit amounts may be reduced if, in the opinion of the Community Development Director, the project is expected to take significantly less time to process than the deposit indicates. A determination on the deposit amount shall be made during the pre-application conference by the case planner. Hourly billing shall still apply. All applications must include an Agreement to Pav Application Fees. One payment including the deposit for Planning and referral agency fees must be submitted with each land use application, made payable to the City of Aspen. Applications will not be accepted for processing without the required application fee. The Community Development Department shall keep an accurate record of the actual time required for the processing of a land use application requiring a deposit. The City can provide a summary report of fees due at the applicant's request. The applicant will be billed for the additional costs incurred by the City when the processing of an application by the Community Development Department takes more time or expense than is covered by the deposit. Any direct costs attributable to a project review shall be billed to the applicant with no additional administrative charge. In the event the processing of an application takes less time than provided for by the deposit, the department shall refund the unused portion of the deposited fee to the applicant. Fees shall be due regardless of whether an applicant receives approval. Unless otherwise combined by the Director for simplicity of billing, all applications for conceptual, final, and recordation of approval documents shall be handled as individual cases for the purposes of billing. Upon conceptual approval all billing shall be reconciled and all past due invoices shall be paid prior to the Director accepting an application for final review. Final review shall require a new deposit at the rate in effect at the time of final application submission. Upon final approval all billing shall again be reconciled prior to the Director accepting an application for review of technical documents for recordation. The Community Development Director may cease processing of a land use application for which an unpaid invoice is 30 or more days past due. Unpaid invoices of 90 or more days past due may be assessed a late fee of 1.75% per month. An unpaid invoice of 120 days or more may be subject to additional actions as may be assigned by the Municipal Court Judge. All payment information is public domain. All invoices shall be paid prior to issuance of a Development Order or recordation of development agreements and plats. The City will not accept a building permit for a property until all invoices are paid in full. For permits already accepted, an unpaid invoice of 90 or more days may result in cessation of building permit processing or issuance of a stop work order until full payment is made. The property owner of record is the party responsible for payment of all costs associated with a land use application for the property. Any secondary agreement between a property owner and an applicant representing the owner (e.g. a contract purchaser) regarding payment of fees is solely between those private parties. January, 2013 City of Aspen I 130 S. Galena St. I (970) 920-5090 14 To Millard Page 2 of 2 2014-07-08 23:24.09 cawn 18667705585 From Christopher May . RECE.D 0062-2014.AW-4 JUL 2 5 2014 Agreement to Pay Application Fees An agreement between the City ot Aspen (City") and Phone Non 970-925-9009 Property Lazy Chair Lot 2, LLC Owner ("11 Email: millard@sopris.net Address of 511 Lazy Chair Road Bil;ing cio Millard J. Zimet, P.C. Property Aspen, Address CO 81611 604 West Main Street (subject of (send bills here) application) Aspen, CO 81611 I understand that the City has adopted, via Ordinance No , Series cf 2011, review fees for Land Use applications and the payment of these fees is a condition precedent to determining application completeness, I understand that as the property owner that lam responsible for paying all fees for this development application, For flat fees and referral fees: I agree to pay the following fees for the services indicated. I understand that these flat fees are non-refundable. 975 Parks 0 Select Dept S flat fee for . S. flat fee for 0 Select Review S flat fee for Select Dept 0 S Aat fee for For deposit cases only: 1 he City and I understand that because of the size, nature or scope of the proposed project, it is not possible at this time to know the full extent or total costs involved in processing the application. 1 understand that additional costs over and asove the deposit may accrue. I understand and agree that it is impracticable for City staff to complete processing, review, and presentation of sufficient information to enable legally required findings to be made for project consideration, unless invoices are paid in full The City and I understand and agree that invoices mailed by the City to the above listed billing address and not returned to the City shall be considered by the City as being received by me. I agree to remit payment within 30 days of presentation of an invoice by the City for such services I have read, understood, and agree to the Land Use Review Fee Policy Including conseqiences for non-payment. I agree to pay the following initial deposit amounts for the specified hours of staff time. I understand that payment of a deposit does not render an application complete or compliant with approval criteria. If actual recorded costs exceed the initial deposit, I agree to pay additional monthly bilings to the City to relmburse the City far the processing of my application at the hourly rates hereinafter stated s 3,250 10 deposit for hours of Community Development Department staff time Additional time above the deposit amount will be billed at $325 per hour. RECEIVED s 265 1 deposit for hours of Engineering Department staff time. Additional time above the deposit amount will be billed at $265 per hour JUL 2 5 2014 City of Aspen: CITY OF ASPEN Property Owner: COMMI INITY DEVELOPMENT Chris Bendon Community Development Director NameÂ· 4 lt,a_ 1,--4- Title.~ City Use: .4490 1-C,4- C f- Fees Due: D Received. $ Januar>. 20 13 City of Aspen ~ 130 S. Galena St. j (970) 920-5090 15 .. CITY OF ASPEN PRE-APPLICATION CONFERENCE SUMMARY PLANNER: Hillary Seminick DATE: May 29, 2014 PROJECT: 511 Lazy Chair Road Lot 2 REPRESENTATIVE: Steev Wilson, Forum Phi, LLC; 970.279.4109, swilson@forumphi.com REQUEST: 8040 Greenline Review DESCRIPTION: The owner is demolishing and replacing an existing single-family home at 511 Lazy Chair Road, Lot 2. The property is zoned Rural Residential (RR). The lot was a part of the three-lot subdivision known as the Arthur O. Pfister Fully Developed Land Subdivision Exemption (Pfister Subdivision), which was approved by Pitkin County and subsequently annexed into the City of Aspen. The property was subject to a mix of County and City land use approvals. These Pitkin County entitlements are removed from the Pfister Subdivision on May 27, 2014 in Ordinance No. 14, Series of 2014 and will be effective June 26, 2014. Conditions of these approvals included a prohibition of development above 8060' above mean sea level because of the steep grade and natural vegetation in this portion of the parcel. An 8040 Greenline Review is reviewed by the Planning and Zoning Commission. The property is also subject to Residential Design Standards. Any variances from the standards may be reviewed by the Planning and Zoning Commission concurrently with the 8040 Greenline Review. Please note that increasing floor area will trigger impact fees, including Parks, TDM/Air Quality, and School Lands Dedication fee in lieu, and that increasing square footage will trigger Affordable Housing Mitigation. The applicant should document the number of bedrooms and square footage of the house being demolished to ensure they get credit for the existing building when they proceed to building permit. Below are links to the Land Use Application form and Land Use Code for your convenience: Land Use App: http://www.aspenpitkin.com/Portals/0/docs/City/Comdev/Apps%20and%20 Fees/2013%20Iand%20 use%20app%20form.pdf Land Use Code: http.//www.aspen pitkin.com/Departments/Community-DevelopmenUPIanni nq-and-Zoning/Title-26- Land-Use-Code/ Relevant Land Use Code Section(s): 26.304 Common Development Review Procedures 26.435.030.C Environmentally Sensitive Areas - 8040 Greenline Exemption 26.470 Growth Management Quota Systems (GMQS) 26.575.020 Calculations and Measurements 26.600 Impact Fees and Dedications 26.710.130 Rural Residential (RR) Zone District 16 Review by: Planning and Zoning Commission Public Hearing: Yes, Planning and Zoning Commission Neighborhood Outreach: Not required. Planning Fees: $3,250 for 10 hours of Planning review. Any unbilled portion of this deposit will be refunded at the conclusion of the case. Additional staff hours, if needed, will be billed at $325 per hour. Referrals: $265 for one hour of Engineering review, $975 for one hour of Parks review. Total Deposit: $4,490 To apply, submit the following information: Â¤ Completed Land Use Application and signed fee agreement. O Pre-application Conference Summary (this document). Il Total deposit for review of the application. O Street address and legal description of the parcel on which development is proposed to occur, consisting of a current (no older than 6 months) certificate from a title insurance company, an ownership and encumbrance report, or attorney licensed to practice in the State of Colorado, listing the names of all owners of the property, and all mortgages, judgments, liens, easements, contracts and agreements affecting the parcel, and demonstrating the owner's right to apply for the Development Application. 0 Applicant's name, address and telephone number in a letter signed by the applicant that states the name, address and telephone number of the representative authorized to act on behalf of the applicant. 0 A site improvement survey (no older than a year from submittal) including topography and vegetation showing the current status of the parcel certified by a registered land surveyor by licensed in the State of Colorado. D HOA Compliance form (Attached) 0 A written description of the proposal and an explanation in written, graphic, or model form of how the proposed development complies with the review standards relevant to the development application. 0 Written responses to all review criteria. Il An 8 1/2" by 11" vicinity map locating the parcel within the City of Aspen. 17 .. 0 10 Copies of the complete application packet and, if applicable, associated drawings. (list # of copies typically associated with PZ, HPC, and CC review, 1 per referral agency) 0 A digital copy of the application provided in pdf file format. O A sketch up model will be required for the public hearing. Disclaimer: The foregoing summary is advisory in nature only and is not binding on the City. The summary is based on current zoning, which is subject to change in the future, and upon factual representations that may or may not be accurate. The summary does not create a legal or vested right. 18 .. Total Deposit for review of the application -44-- Il -- I O r- , ..iiI ' I.- 1 - *Ata-:-bi, A Â· .14.. t~Â· 01 -14 -' JÂ¥ 720 E. HYMAN -Mr,tn:Z:L. ' m K e.9 C.2.1.(ill'lip 2 ' 4* 1'* ~ I' ~,wr-7 '... I -I. - .4.M..me.wÂ¥7-7...IFY9-27.- - - 19 7/10/2014 Parcel Detai I .. Tax Account Parcel 2013 Mill Property Type Area N umbe r Number Levy 001 R016359 273511302002 RESIDENTIAL 32.843 Primary Owner Name and Address LAZY CHAIR LOT 2 LLC 0133 PROSPECTOR RD#41028 ASPEN, CO 81611 Additional Owner Detail Legal Description Subdivision: ARTHUR O PFISTER EXEMPTION Lot: 2 Location Physical Address: 511 LAZY CHAIR LN ASPEN ARTHUR O PFISTER Subdivision: EXEMPTION Land Acres: 2.400 Land Sq Ft: 0 2014 Property Value Summary Actual Value Assessed Value Land: 3,450,000 274,620 Improvements: J 265,800 21,160~ Total: 3,715,800 295,780 Sale Date: 2/28/2014 Sale Price: 2,500,000 20 http:/twww.pitlgnassessor.org/assessor/Parcel.asp?AccountNumber= R016359 1/1 .. WHEN RECORDED RETURN TO: Doc 0 4250< aD Millard J. Zimet, P.C. 604 W Main Street RECEPTION#: 608319, 02/28/2014 at Aspen, Colorado 81611 03:18:17 PM, 1 OF 2, R $16.00 DF $250.00 Doc Code PER REP DEED Janice K. Vos Caudill, Pitkin County, CO SPACE ABOVE THIS LINE FOR RECORDER'S USE PERSONAL REPRESENTATIVE'S DEED (SALE) THIS DEED is dated February 28, 2014, and is made between Andrew V. Hecht, as Personal Representative of the Estate of Elizabeth H. Pfister, deceased, "Grantor," and Lazy Chair Lot 2 LLC, a Colorado limited liability company, "Grantee," whose address is c/o Aspen Starwood, LLC, 0133 Prospector Road, Suite 4102B, Aspen, CO 81611, County of Pitkin, State of Colorado. WHEREAS, Elizabeth H. Pfister died on the date of November 17, 2011 and the Grantor was duly appointed Personal Representative of said estate by the District Court in and for the County of Pitkin, and State of Colorado, Probate No. 11PR60, on the date of November 28, 2011, and is now qualified and acting in said capacity. NOW TIIEREFORE, pursuant to the powers conferred upon the Grantor by the Colorado Probate Code, Grantor does hereby sell and convey unto Grantee, for and in consideration of Two Million Five Hundred Thousand and No/100 Dollars ($2,500,000.00), the following described real property situate in the County of Pilkin, State of Colorado: Lot 2, ARTHUR O. PFISTER FULLY DEVELOPED LANDS SUBDIVISION EXEMPTION, according to the plat thereof recorded April 14, 1993 in Plat Book 42 at Page 45, as Reception No. 403369, Pitkin County, Colorado, also known by street address as: 511 Lazy Chair Ranch Road, Aspen, CO 81611 and assessor's schedule or parcel number: 273511302002 With all appurtenances. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Grantor has executed this Deed on the date set forth above. GRANTOR: The Estate ofElizabeth H. Pfister, deceased 1223~V.Fecht,Personal Representative CITY OF ASPEN CITY OF- 1SPEN WAETT PAM) DATE REP HaErr PAID 91*/1 4/ ht..140. 466&6 ~~~,29?L p,0 *sal. fÂ«'TI- Mi MAW#34*/Fakjag,A .. STATE OF COLORADO ) ) SS. COUNTY OF PITKIN ) The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me thi~ay of February, 2014, by Andrew V. Hecht Personal Representative of the Estate of Elizabeth A. Pfister, deceased. Witness my hand and official seal. My commission expires: ~b '7 i f STACY STANEK NOTARY PUBLIC STATE OF COLORADO /-0 21 NOTARY ID #20024032730 E-= My Commission Bg,Ires October 7,2014 Notary'~ W 22 ~ Title Insurance Commitment ~~~~~~~~~~~~~|~ ISSUED BY ~ First American Title Insurance Company Commitment INFORMATION TABLE OF CONTENTS The Title Insurance Commitment is a legal contract between you and the Company. It is issued to show the basis on which AGREEMENT TO ISSUE POLICY 1 we will issue a Title Insurance Policy to you. The Pblicy will insure you against certain risks to the land title, subject to the CONDITIONS 2 limitations shown in the Policy. The Company will give you a sample of the Policy form, if you SCHEDULE A Insert ask. The Policy contains an arbitration clause. All arbitrable matters 1. Commitment Date when the Amount of Insurance Is $2,000,000 or less shall be. arbitrated at the option of either the -Company or you as the exclusive remedy of the parties. You may review a copy of the 2. Policies to be Issued, Amounts arbitration rules at http://www.alta.org/. and Proposed Insureds The Commitment is based on the land title as of the Commitment Date,. Any changes in the land title or the 3. Interest in the Land and Owner transaction may affect the Commitment and the Policy. The Commitment is subject to its Requirements, Exceptions 4. Description of the Land and Conditions, THIS INFORMATION IS NOT PART OF THE TITLE SCHEDULE B-1 - REQUIREMENTS Insert INSURANCE COMMITMENT. YOU SHOULD READ THE COMMITMENT VERY CAREFULLY. SCHEDULE B-11- EXCEPTIONS Insert If you have any questions about the Commitment, contact: FIRST AMERICAN TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY 1 First American Way, Santa Ana, California 92707 AGREEMENT TO ISSUE POLICY We agree to issue policy to you according to the teniis of the Commitment. When we show the policy amount and your name as the proposed insured in Schedule A, this Commitment becomes effective as of the Commitment Date shown in Schedule A. If the Requirements shown in this Commitment have not been met within six months after the Commitment Date, our obligation under this Commitment will end. Also, our obligation Linder this Commitment will end when the Policy is issued and then our obligation to you will be under the Policy. Our obligation under this Commitment is limited by the following: â€¢ The Provisions in Schedule A â€¢ The Requirements in Schedule B-1. â€¢ The Exceptions in Schedule B-11. â€¢ The Conditionson Page 2. This Commitment is not valid without SCHEDULE A and Sections I and 11 of SCHEDULE B. First American Title insurance Company /622+40 ty>pa 44.21\ 4-j- ~ AL Â»9Â« .: 3 S i SEPTEMBER 24, i Dennis J. Gilmore Timothy Kemp %24;;FO.A>/ President I Secretary , (This Commitment Is valid only when Schedules A and B are attached) This jacket was created electronically and constitutes an original document Copyright 2006-2009 American Land Title Association. All rights reserved. The use of this form is restricted to ALTA licensees and ALTA members in good standing as of the date of use. All other uses are prohibited. Reprinted under license from the American land Title Association. LJ ~ Form 5011000 (6-22-10) Page 1 of 2 ~ ALTA Plain Language Commitment (6-17-06) ..t'dw L -i CONDITIONS 1. DEFINITIONS (a) 'Mortgage" means mortgage, deed .of trust or .other security instrument. (b) "Public Records" means title records. that give constructive notice of matters affecting your title according to the state statutes where your land is located. 2. LATER DEFECTS The Exceptions in Schedule B - Section 11 may be amended to show any defects, liens or encumbrances that appear for the first time in the public records or are created or attached between the Commitment Date and the date on which all of the Requirements (a) and (c) of Schedule B - Section I are met. We shall have no liability to you because of this amendment. 3. EXISTING DEFECTS If any defects, liens or encumbrances existing at Commitment Date are not shown in Schedule B, we may amend Schedule B to show them. If we do amend Schedule B to show these defects, liens or encumbrances, we shall be liable to you according to Paragraph 4 below unless you knew of this information and did not tell us about it in writing. 4. LIMITATION OF OUR LIABILITY Our only obligation is to issue to you the Policy referred to in this Commitment, when you have met its Requirements. If we have any liability to you for any loss you incur because of an error in this Commitment, our liability will be limited to your actual loss caused by your relying on this Commitment when you acted in good faith to: Comply with the Requirements shown in Schedule B - Section I or Eliminate with our written consent any Exceptions shown in Schedule B - Section 11. We shall not be liable for more than the Policy Amount shown in Schedule A of this Commitment and our liability is subject to the terms of the Policy form to be issued to you. 5. CLAIMS MUST BE BASED ON THIS COMMITMENT Any claim, whether or not based on negligence, which you may have against us concerning the title to the land must be based on this Commitment and is subject to its terms. ~ Form 5011000 (6-22-10) Page 2 of 2 ~ ALTA Plain Language Commitment (6-17-06) 24 American Land Title Association ALTA Commitment Form Adopted 6-17-06 First American Title Insurance Co. Commitment Number: 14003208 SCHEDULE A 1. Effective Date: February 25, 2014 at 07:45 AM 2. Policy or Policies to be issued: Amount , Premium A. ALTA Own. Policy (06/17/06) $ 2,500,000.00 $ 3,427.00 Proposed Insured: Lazy Chair Lot 2 LLC, a Colorado limited liability company Certificate of Taxes Due $ 25.00 Endorsements: Form 110.1 (Delete 1, 2, 3, 4) $ 75.00 Additional Charges: $ 0.00 Total $ 3,527.00 3. The estate or interest in the land described or referred to in this Commitment is Fee Simple, 4. Title to the Fee Simple estate or interest in the land is at the Effective Date vested in: Elizabeth H. Pfister, deceased 5. The land referred to in the Commitment is described as follows: SEE EXHIBITAATTACHED HERETO For informational purposes only, the property address is: 511 Lazy Chair Ranch Road, Aspen, Colorado 81611 Attorneys Title Insurance Agency of Aspen By: Authorized Officer or Agent FOR INFORMATION OR SERVICES IN CONNECTION WITH THIS COMMITMENT, CONTACT. Winter T, Van Alstine, 715 W. Main Street, Suite 305, Aspen, Colorado 81611, Phone:: (970) 925-7328, Fax: (970) 925-7348. THIS COMMITMENT IS ISSUED SUBJECTTO THE STATEMENT OF TERMS, CONDITIONS ANDSTIPULATIONS ATTACHED. Copyright 2006-2009 American Land Title Association. All rights reserved. - AMERICAN The use of this Form is restricted to ALTA licensees and ALTA members in good standing as of the date of use. LAND TITLE All other uses are prohibited. Reprinted under license from the American Land Title Association. ASSOCIATION Alit (14003208.PFD/14003208/57) 25 .. American Land Title Association ALTA Commitment Form Adopted 6-17-06 First American Title Insurance Co. Commitment Number: 14003208 SCHEDULE B 1. Requirements: 1. Pay the agreed amounts for the interest in the land and/or the mortgage to be insured. 2. Pay us the premiums, fees and charges for the policy. 3. Documents satisfactory to us creating the interest in the land and/or the mortgage to be insured must be signed, delivered and recorded. 4. You must tell us in writing the name of anyone not referred to in this Commitment who will get an interest in the land or who will make a loan on the land. We may then make additional requirements or exceptions. 5. Payment of all taxes, charges and assessments, levied and assessed against the subject premises which are due and payable. 6. A Certification of Taxes due listing each taxing jurisdiction shall be obtained from the County Treasu rer or an authorized agent (pursuant to Senate Bill 92-143, CRS 10-11-122). 7. Receipt by the Company of the appropriate affidavit as to new construction and indemnifying the Company against any unfiled materialmen's or mechanic's liens. 8. Personal Representative's Deed from the Personal Representative of the Estate of Elizabeth H. Pfister, deceased, to Lazy Chair Lot 2 LLC, a Colorado limited liability company. 9. Certified Letters of Appointment for the Estate of Elizabeth H. Pfister, deceased, evidencing the appointment of the Personal Representative for the estate. NOTE: The Letters must be from a Court within the State of Colorado, if the Estate is open in another state, an Ancillary Estate must be opened in Colorado, 10. Release of the Deed of Trust from Elizabeth H. Pfister, survivor of herself and Arthur O. Pfister to the Public Trustee of Pitkin County for the benefit of JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A., to secure an indebtedness in the principal sum of $1,500,000.00, and any other amounts and/obligations secured thereby, dated September 20,2011, and recorded October 7, 2011, as Reception No. 583381. 11. Evidence satisfactory to the company that the estate of Elizabeth H. Pfister, deceased, is not subject to the Federal Estate Tax. 12. Certificate of Good Standing from the Colorado Secretary of State for Lazy Chair Lot 2 LLC, a Colorado limited liability company. Copyright 2006-2009 American Land Title Association. All rights reserved. - AMERICAN LAND TITLE The use of this Form is restricted to ALTA licensees and ALTA members ASSOCIATION in good standing as of the date of use. An other uses are prohibited. - Reprinted under license from the American Land Tftle Association. (14003208.PFD/14003208/58) 26 , 0< . American Land Title Association ALTA Commitment Form Adopted 6-17-06 Commitment Number: 14003208 SCHEDULE B (Continued) 13. Record a Statement of Authority to provide prima facie evidence of existence of Lazy Chair Lot 2 LLC, a Colorado limited liability company, an entity capable of holding property, and the name of the person authorized to execute instruments affecting title to real property as authorized by C.R.S. Section 38-30-172. 14. A copy of the properly signed and executed Operating Agreement if written, for Lazy Chair Lot 2 LLC, a Colorado limited liability company, to be submitted to the Company for review. 15. Improvement Survey Plat sufficient in form, content and certification acceptable to the Company. Exception will be taken to adverse matters disclosed thereby. 16. A good and sufficient access easement for access to Lot 2 across Lot 3. 17. This Title Commitment is subject to underwriter approval. 2. Schedule B of the policy or policies to be issued will contain exceptions to the following matters unless the same are disposed of to the satisfaction of the Company: 1. Any facts, rights, interests or claims which are not shown by the Public Records, but which could be ascertained by an inspection of the Land or by making inquiry of persons in possession thereof. 2. Easements, or claims of easements, not shown by the Public Records. 3. Discrepancies, conflicts in boundary lines, shortage in area, encroachments, and any facts which a correct survey and inspection of the Land would disclose, and which are not shown by the Public Records. 4. Any lien, or right to a lien, for services, labor or material theretofore or hereafter furnished, imposed by law and not shown in the Public Records. 5. Any and all unpaid taxes, assessments and unredeemed tax sales. 6. (a) Unpatented mining claims; (b) reservations or exceptions in patents or in Acts authorizing the issuance thereof; (c) water rights, claims or title to water, whether or not the matters excepted under (a), (b), or (c) are shown by the Public Records. 7. Taxes for the year 2013, and taxes for 2014, not yet due or payable. 8. Rights to ditches and reservoirs used in connection with such water rights and right of the proprietor of a vein or lode to extract and remove his ore therefrom, should the same be found to penetrate or intersect the premises as reserved in the United States Patent dated April 3,1896, and recorded August 26, 1911, in Book 55 at Page 191, as Reception No. 074888. Copyright 2006-2009 American Land TitleAssociation. All rights reserved. Ilill'llill AMERICAN LAND TTTLE The use of this Form is restricted to ALTA licensees and ALTA members ASSOCIATION in good standing as of the date of use. All other uses are prohibited. . Reprinted under license from the American Land Title Association. (14003208.PFD/14003208/58) 27 American Land Title Association ALTA Commitment Form Adopted 6-17-06 Commitment Number: 14003208 SCHEDULE B (Continued) 9. Terms, condiuons, provisions, agreements and obligations specified under the Warranty Deed dated November 7, 1950, and recorded November 15,1950, in Book 176 at page 79, as Reception No. 097937, and Correction Deed dated November 7, 1958, and recorded November 10, 1958, in Book 185 at Page 486, as Reception No. 107215, and in Book 242 at Page 369A. 10. Any and all notes, easements and recitals as disclosed on the recorded plat recorded May 18, 1951, in Plat Book 2A at Page 146, as Reception No. 098360. 11. Terms, condmons, provisions, agreements and obligations specified under the Agreement dated May 10,1951, and recorded June 1, 1951, in Book 175 at Page 513 as Reception No. 098386, and Quit Claim Deed dated December 19,1969, and recorded December 19, 1969, in Book 245 at Page 114, as Reception No. 138379, and Agreement dated December 19, 1969, and recorded December 19, 1969, in Book 245 at Page 116, as Reception No. 138380, and re-recorded August 25, 1972, in Book 266 at Page 253, as Reception No. 153537. 12. Terms, condi#ons, provisions, ag reements and obligations specmed under the Lease dated May 1, 1967, and recorded February 10, 1970, in Book 246 at Page 711, as Reception No. 139294, and Amendment to Lease dated November 27, 1969, in Book 246 at Page 728, as Reception No. 139295. 13. Terms, condi#ons, provisions, agreements and obligations specmed under the Deed of Easement dated November 27, 1969, and recorded February 10, 1970, in Book 246 at Page 740, as Reception No. 139296. 14. Terms, cond~ons, provisions, agreements and obligations specified under the Deed of Easement dated November 27, 1969, and recorded February 10, 1970, in Book 246 at Page 746, as Reception No. 139297, and Deed of Easement dated November 28, 1969, in Book 246 at Page 752, as Reception No. 139298. 15. Terms, conditions, provisions, agreements and obligations specMed under the Deed of Easement dated February 2, 1970, and recorded March 18, 1970, in Book 247 at Page 424, as Reception No. 139727. 16. Terms, conditions, provisions, agreements and obligations specilied under the Grant of Easement dated October 27, 1977, and recorded November 15, 1977, in Book 338 at Page 694, as Reception No. 199364. 17. Terms, conditions, provisions, agreements and obligations specmed under the Second Amendment to Lease dated November 14,1977, and recorded November 18, 1977, in Book 338 at Page 994, as Reception No. 199510. 18. Terms, conditions, provisions, agreements and obligations specilied under the Quit Claim Deed dated August 8, 1982, and recorded August 25, 1982, in Book 431 at Page 614, as Reception No. 243705. Copyright 2006-2009 American Land Title Association. All rights reserved. - AMERICAN LAND TITLE The use of this Form is restrided to ALTA licensees and ALTA members ASSOCIATION in good standing as of the date of use. All other uses are prohibited. ~:- Reprinted under license from the American Land Title Association. (14003208.PFD/14003208/58) 28 . American Land Title Association ALTA Commitment Form Adopted 6-17-06 Commitment Number: 14003208 SCHEDULE B (Continued) 19. Terms, conditions, provisions, agreements and obligations specified under the Lease Agreement dated August 16, 1982, and recorded August 25, 1982, in Book 431 at Page 627, as Reception No. 243707. 20. Terms, condÂ®ns, provisions, agreements and obligations specified under the Lease Agreement dated August 16,1982, and recorded August 25, 1982, in Book 431 at Page 628, as Reception No. 243708. 21. Terms, condmons, provisions, ag reements and obligations specified under the Agreement dated August 8, 1982, and recorded August 25, 1982, in Book 431 at Page 617, as Reception No, 243706, and Amended Agreement dated January 15,1984, and recorded February 3, 1984, in Book 460 at Page 373, as Reception No. 257066. 22. Any and all notes, easements and recitals as disclosed on the recorded Tiehack Water Tank Site Platting Exemption Plat, recorded September 17, 1982, in Plat Book 13 at Page 88, as Reception No. 244234, and the Tiehack Water Tank Site Platting Exemption Plat dated June 6,1983, and recorded June 10, 1983, in Plat Book 15 at Page 5, as Reception No. 250827. 23. Terms, conditions, provisions, agreements and obligations specified under the Agreement dated January 5, 1984, and recorded January 6, 1984, in Book 458 at Page 752, as Reception No. 256282. 24. Terms, conditions, provisions, ag reements and obligations specilied under the Tax Free Exchange Agreement dated December 6,1983, and recorded February 3, 1984, in Book 460 at Page 366, as Reception No. 257065. 25. Terms, conditions, provisions, ag reements and obligations specMed under the Quit Claim Deed dated December 6, 1983, and recorded February 3, 1984, in Book 460 at Page 384, as Reception No. 257067. 26. Terms, condi#ons, provisions, agreements and obligations specded under the Quit Claim Deed dated January 19, 1984, and recorded February 6, 1984, in Book 460 at Page 573, as Reception No. 257132. 27. Terms, condidons, provisions, agreements and obligations specilied under the Quit Claim Deed dated March 31, 1984, and recorded April 11,1984, in Book 464 at Page 421, as Reception No. 258682, and Clarification Deed dated September 12, 1988, and recorded February 17, 1989, in Book 586 at Page 147, as Reception No. 308906. Copyright 2006-2009 American Land Title Association. All rights reserved. - AMERICAN LAND TITLE The use of this Form is restricted to ALTA licensees and ALTA members ASSOCIATION in good standing as of the date of use. All other uses are prohibited. Reprinted under license from the American Land Title Association. (14003208.PFD/14003208/58) 29 American Land Title Association ALTA Commitment Form Adopted 6-17-06 Commitment Number: 14003208 SCHEDULE B (Continued) 28. Terms, conditions, provisions, agreements and obligations specified under the Resolution of the Board of County Commissioners of Pitkin County, Colorado, Granting Approval of Detailed Submission for Subdivision, 1041 Environmental Hazard Review, Scenic Foreground Overlay Review, Planned Unit Development, Rezoning, Special Review Approval for Relocation of the KSNO Radio Tower, Lot Line Adjustment with the ARU Property, General and Detailed Submission to the "Grand Amendment" portion of the Application and Amendment to the Buttermilk Ski Area Master Plan for the Pfister Ranch / Golf Application (Resolution No. 91-,111) dated June 11, 1991, and recorded September 23,1991, in Book 657 at Page 306, as Reception No. 336728, and Amendment to Resolution No. 91-111 of the Board of County Commissioners of Pitkin County, Colorado, Granting Approval of Detailed Submission for Subdivision, 1041 Environmental Hazard Review, Scenic Foreground Overlay Review, Planned Unit Development, Rezoning, Special Review Approval for Relocation of the KSNO Radio Tower, Lot Line Adjustment with the ARU Property, General and Detailed Submission to the "Grand Amendment" portion of the Application and Amendment to the Buttermilk Ski Area Master Plan for the Pfister Ranch / Golf Application (Resolution No. 91-112) dated August 7, 1991, and recorded September 23, 1991, in Book 657 at Page 384, as Reception No. 336729. 29. Terms, condmons, provisions, agreements and obligations specMed under the Dedication Agreement for Roads dated August 13, 1993, and recorded November 12, 1993, in Book 730 at Page 662, as Reception No. 363240. 30. Terms, condmons, provisions, agreements and obligations specmed under the Access Easement Agreement dated September 8,1993, and recorded November 12, 1993, in Book 730 at Page 774, as Reception No. 363255. 31. Terms, condmons, provisions, agreements and obligations specified under the Special Warranty Deed dated November 12,1993, and recorded November 12, 1993, in Book 730 at Page 747, as Reception No. 363250. 32. Terms, condiuons, provisions, agreements and obligations specified under the Special Warranty Deed dated November 12, 1993, and recorded November 12, 1993, in Book 730 at Page 793, as Reception No. 363257. 33. 30 foot wide Access Easement as reflected on tbe St. Luke's Community Health Resources, Inc. Lot Line Adjustment Plat recorded November 12, 1993, in Plat Book 33 at Page 3, as Reception No. 363254 and the Final Subdivision Plat & PUD for Maroon Creek Club recorded November 15, 1993, in Plat Book 33 at Page 4, as Reception No. 363275. 34. Terms, cond~ons, provisions, agreements and obligations specMed under the Water Service Agreement dated July 26, 1993, and recorded November 15, 1993, in Book 730 at Page 797, as Reception No. 363258, and First Amendment to Water Service Agreement dated July 26, 1993, and recorded October 17, 1997, as Reception No. 409559. 35. Terms, condmons, provisions, agreements and obligations specmed under the Access Easement Agreement dated November 19, 1993, and recorded December 2, 1993, in Book 733 at Page 590, as Reception No. 364074. Copyright 2006-2009 American Land Title Association. All rights reserved. - AMERICAN LAND TITLE The use of this Form is restrided to ALTA licensees and ALTA members ASSOCIATION in good standing as ofthe date of use. Allother uses are prohibited. ~:- Reprinted under license from the American Land Title Association. (14003208.PFD/14003208/58) 30 .. American Land Title Association ALTA Commitment Form Adopted 6-17-06 Commitment Number: 14003208 SCHEDULE B (Continued) 36. Terms, condiuons, provisions, agreements and obligations specilied under the Golf Course Easement Agreement dated December 8, 1993, and recorded December 15 1993, in Book 735 at Page 400, as Reception 364622. 37. Terms, conditions, provisions, ag reements and obligations specified under the Declaration of Restrictive Covenants dated December 10, 1993, and recorded December 22, 1993, in Book 736 at Page 335, as Reception No. 364890. 38. Terms, condi~ons, provisions, ag reements and obligations specified under the Resolution of the Board of County Commissioners of Pitkin County, Colorado, Granting Approval for Fully Developed Lands Subdivision Exemption, Essential Community Facilities Subdivision Exemption, Special Review, 1041 Environmental Hazard Review and Scenic Foreground Overlay and General Submission Review for the Pfister Property (Resolution No. 94-239) dated December 20,1994, and recorded March 2,1995, in Book 775 at Page 282, as Reception No. 379407. 39. Any and all notes, easements and recitals as disclosed on the recorded plat of Arthur O. Pfister Fully Developed Lands Subdivision Exemption Plat recorded April 14,1997, in Plat book 42 at Page 45, a Reception No. 403369, and Consent and Ratification of Plat dated May 30,2008, and recorded June 16, 2008, as Reception No. 550278. 40. Terms, condmons, provisions, agreements and obligations specified under An Ordinance of the City Council of the City of Aspen, Colorado, Approving the Annexation of Certain Territory to the City of Aspen, Colorado, to be known and Designated as the "Maroon Creek Club Subdivision (South) Property" Annexation (Ordinance No. 34 (Series of 1996), dated August 26,1996, and recorded February 21,1997, as Reception No. 401985. 41. Terms, condmons, provisions, ag reements and obligations specified under An Ordinance of the Aspen City Council Granting a Rezoning for the Maroon Creek Subdivision in Conjunction with Annexation Into the City ofAspen, dated October 28,1996, and recorded April 8, 1997, as Reception No. 403224. 42. Any and all notes, easements and recitals as disclosed on the recorded Maroon Creek Club Subdivision (South) Annexation Plat recorded February 6, 1997, in Plat Book 41 at Page 76, as Reception No, 401571. 43. Intentionally deleted. 44. Encroachment of Golf Tee and septic lids onto subject property as reflected on the Improvement Survey Plat provided by Tuttle Surveying Services dated July 18, 2012. 45. Terms, conditions, provisions, agreements and obligations specilied under the Easement Deed dated February , 2014, and recorded February , 2014, as Reception No. Copyright 2006-2009 American Land Title Association. All rights reserved. Ill'll'llil AMER.]CAN LAND TITLE The use of this Form is restrided to ALTA licensees and ALTA members A5S0CtATI0N in good standing as of the date of use. All other uses are prohibited. Reprinted under license from the American Land Title Association. (14003208.PFD/14003208/84) 31 .. DISCLOSURE STATEMENT - Pursuant to C. R:S. 30-10-406(3)(a) all documents recefved for recording or filing in the Clerk and Recorder's office shall contain a bp margin of at least one inch and a left, right and bottom margin of at least one-half of an inch. The Clerk and Recorder will refuse to record or file any document that does not conform to the requirements of this sectjon. NOTE: If thisÂ· transaction includes a sale of the property and the price exceeds $100,000Â·00, the seller must comply *jth the*disclosure/withholding provisions of C.R.S. 39-22-604.5 (Nonresident withholding). NOTE: Colorado Division of Insurance Regulations 3-5-1 requires that "Every title entity shall be responsible for all matters which appear of record prior to the time of recording whenever the title entity conducts the closing and is responsible for recording or filing of legal documents resulting from the transaction which was closed." Provided that First Amerbcan.Title Insurance Company.conducts the closing of the insured transacbon and is responsible for recording the legal documents from the transaction, excepticin number 5 will not appear on the Owner's Title Policy and the Lenders .Policy when issued. Pursuant to C.R.S, 10-11-122, the company will not issue its policy or policies of title insurance contemplated by.this commitment until it has been- provided a Certificateof Taxes due or other equ)valent documentation from the County Treasurer or the County Treasurer' s authorized agent or until the Proposed Insured has notjfied or instructed the company in wriMng to the contrary. - The subject property may be located in a special taxing district. A Certificate of Taxes due listing each taxing jurisdiction shall be obtained from the County Treasurer or.the County Treasurer' s au:thorized agent Information regarding special districts and the boundaries of such districts maybe obtained from the Board of County Commissioners, the County C16rk and Recorder, or the County Assessor. NOTE: Pursuant to CRS 10-11-1 23, notice is hereby given: This notice applies to owner'R pnliny r.nrhmitmmr,+R nr,nt.ining_a-mine:al-severanee--Instmment--exeeptioni exceptions, in Schedule E, Section 2. A. That there is recorded e*idence that a mineral estate has been severed, leased, or otherwise conveyed from the surface estate and that there is a substantial likelihood that a third party holds some or al[ interest in oil:.gas, other minerals, or geothermal energy in the property; and B. That such mineral estate may include the right to enter and use the property without the surface ownefs permission. NOTE: . Pursuant to Colorado Division of insurance Regulations 34-1, Affirma#ve mechanic's lien protection for r the Owner may be available (typically by deletion of Exception no. 4 of Schedule B, Section 2 of the Commitment frorn Â·the Ownets Poiicy to be issued) upon compliance with the following conditions: A. The land described in Schedule A of_this commitment must be a single family residence which includes a condominium or townhouse unit. B, No labor or materials have been furnished by mechanics or material-men for purposes of construction on the land described in Schedule A of this Commitment within the past 6 months. C. The Company must Â·receive an appropriate affidavit indemnifying the Company against un.filed mechanicss and material-ments liens. D. The Company must recetve. payment of the appropriate premium. E. If there has been construction, improvements or major repairs undertaken on Â· the property to be purchased within six months prior to the Date of the Commitment, the requirements to obtain coverage ~ for unrecorded fiens will include: disclosure *of certain construction information; financial information as to the seller, the builder and or the contractor; payment of the appropriate premium, fuity executed Indemnity Agreemants satisfactory to the company, andy any additional requirements as may - be necessary after an examination of the aforesaid information by the Company, No coverage will be given under any circumstances for labor or material for which the insured has contracted for . or agreed to pay, First American Title InsurOke Company NOTE; Pursuant to C.RS. 38-35- ~6 . person or entity that provides closing ~~1. Jement services for a real estate tansaction shall disburse funds as a part of such services until- those funds have been received and are available for immediate withdrawal as a maker of right NOTE: C.R.S, 39-14-102 requires that a real property transfer declaration accompany- any conveyance document presented for recordatjon in the State of Colorado. Said declaration shal) .be completed and signed by either the. grantor or grantee. ' NOTE: Pursuant to CRS 10-1-128(6)(ah k is uniawful to knowingly provide false, incomp)ete, or misleading facts or information to an insurance company for -the purpose of defrauding or attempting to defraud the company. Penalties may include imprisonment, fines, deniail of insurance ahd civi[ damages. Any insurance company .or agent of an insurance company who knowingly proVides false, incompitate, or misleading facts or information to a policyholder or daimant for the purpose of defrauding or attempting to defraud the poficyholder or claimant with regard to a settlement or award payable from insurance proceeds shall be reported to the Colorado division of insurance within the department of regulatory agencies. Nothing herein contained Will be deemed to obitate the company to provide any of the covefages referred to herein unless the above conditions are fully satisfied. First American' Title Insurance Company ; 33 ' 1. First American Title Insurance Co. Commitment Number: 14003208 EXHIBIT A PROPERTY DESCRIPTION The land referred to in this Commitment is described as follows: Lot 2, ARTHUR O. PFISTER FULLY DEVELOPED LANDS SUBDIVISION EXEMPTION, according to the plat thereof recorded April 14, 1993 in Plat Book 42 at Page 45, as Reception No. 403369, Pitkin County, Colorado. ALTA Commitment Exhibit A (14003208.PFD/14003208/19) 34 . A . rir==-. ArrdRNEYS TIYLE INSUMANCE AGENCY OF ASPEN, LLC 715 WEsT. MAIN STREET, SUITE 305 ASPEN, COLORADC) 8 1 6 1 1 ATIORNEYS ITILE INSURANCE AGENCY OF ASPEN, LLC Privacy Policy Notice PURPOSE OFTE[rS NOTICE ~ Title VÂ·of the Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act (GLBA) generallyÂ· prohibits Ey financial institdon, direcdy or-through its affiliates, from sharing nonpublic personal information about yon with a nonwffiliated third party unless the inslitution provides yon ANh anotice of its privacy.policies - and pratices, so.ch as the type of informadon that it collects about you. and the categories of persons or enities to whom kmay be disclosed. I~ compliance with the GTRA, we ard providing you with this document, which notifies yon of the privacy policies and practices of Attorneys Ti:tie bisteco-ce Agency of Aspen, ILC. We may collect nompublic personalinfomation aboutyon from the following sources: â€¢ Informaton we receive from yon, snch as on applications or other foms. â€¢ Infomnation abot your transamons we secure from our files, or from our affiliates or others. â€¢ I:nformation wereceive fromacbnsumer reporting agency. , â€¢ Information that we receive from otbers involved in your transa=Mon, soch as the real estate agent or lender. Unless it is specifically stated otherwise in an amended Privacy Policy Notice, no .addiiional nonpublic personal informaâ‚¬on wi!1 be collected about yon We may disclose any of the above infomnation that we cÂ®.ect about our costomers or former castomers to our affilis.tes or to nonaffilisted third pardes as pemnitted by law. We also may disclose this inbrmation *about our customers or former customers to the following Spes of nona:Eiated companies dial perform marketing siervices on our behalf oh with whom - we have joini marketing agreemeI:Its: â€¢ Financial service providers such as companies engaged in. banldng, consumer -FinRnrp, secuities and insurance. â€¢ Non-financial companies such .as envelope stuffers and other .fn}GThnent . service providers. WE DO NOT DISCLOSE ANY NONPUBLIC PERSONAL INFORMATION ABOUT YOU WES ANyONE FORANY PURPOSE THATIE NOT SPECIFICAILY-PERMInED BYLA-W, We restrict access to nonpublic personal informzdion about you to those employees who need to know that infomnaâ‚¬on in order to -provide products or services to yon- We maintain physical, , electronic, and procedural safeguards that comply with federal regulations to guard your i IlOIL]public personal informadon, - 1 TELEPHONE 970 925-7328 4 66 FAcsMLE 970 925-7348 , 35 .. CONSENT AND AUTHORIZATION TO REPRESENT Lazy Chair Lot 2 LLC c/o Millard J. Zimet, P.C. 604 West Main Street Aspen, CO 81611 3/3/14 City of Aspen Community Development Department 130 South Galena Street, 3rd Floor Aspen, Colorado 81611 Lot 2 Arthur O. Pfister Subdivision Aspen, CO 81611 Dear Director, This letter shall serve as my approval for Forum Phi Architecture to submit, represent and obtain materials on the behalf of the owner of Lot 2 of the Arthur O. Pfister Subdivision. Lazy Chair Lot 2 LLC hereby authorjzes Steev Wilson and Forum Phi to perform and submit documents related to planning, Building Permit Application, or to gain building file information on our behalf for the project located at Lot 2 Arthur O, Pfister Subdivision Aspen, CO 81611. They may represent us during the application review and approval processes. They may act on our behalf, may sign on our behalf all applications and permits, and any documents required or ancillary thereto. Steev Wilson, Partner, AIA Forum Phi Architecture 715 W Main Street, Ste 204 Aspen, CO 81611 Sincerely, /./Â«â‚¬55, 6 4.0... o 3 10474 1 / 024. /1/- 6,11 y C Lic :c 4,7- 1 2.Â·to L- Al w v t<- )+A 61 L t/tu~ Print Name 36 .. COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT Homeowner Association Compliance Policy All land use applications within the City of Aspen are required to include a Homeowner Association Compliance Form (this form) certifying the scope of work included in the land use application complies with all applicable covenants and homeowner association policies. The certification must be signed bv the properly owner or Attorney representing the properly owner. Name: Lazy Chair Lot 2 LLC Property Owner 03: Email: millard@sopris.net Phone No.: 970-925-9009 Address of Property: 5111.az) Chair Rd. Aspen, ('081611 (subject of application) I certify as follows: (pick one) U This property is not subject to a homeowners association or other form of private covenant. D This property is subject to a homeowners association or private covenant and the improvements proposed in this land use application do not require approval by the homeowners association or covenant beneficiary. This property is subject to a homeowners association or private covenant and the improvements proposed in this land use application have been approved by the homeowners association or covenant beneficiary. Evidence of approval is attached. I understand this policy and I understand the City of Aspen does not interpret, enforce, or manage the applicability, meaning or effect of private covenants or homeowner association rules or bylaws. 1 understand that this document is a public document. Owner signature: date: Owner printed name: or, Attorney signature: , \ 9 L o\Ll date: - = ' 7 1 /1 Attorney printed name: Mt k-,1 3- Z..Â£et 37 .. WILLIAM CLINTON LUKES ARCHITECT , ,Â¥..t Monday, June 30, 2014 Steev Wilson Forum Phi Architects 715 West Main Street, Suite 20 Aspen, Colorado 81611 sent via email ret Maroon Creek Club, Pfister Subdivision Lot 2 Site and Architecture Review Committee Approvals Steev: This will confirm that the Site and Architecture Review Committee of the Maroon Creek Club Master Association, by a vote of the Committee members present at the June 26, 2014 meeting, granted the following approval: Schematic Plan Architectural Approval for Pfister Subdivision Lot 2 as provided by the Maroon Creek Club Design Guidelines based on plans received 6/5/2014 and 6/26/2014. This is a preliminary approval. Approval to proceed with any construction or work on site was not included in the approval granted. By the vote of the Committee members present, this approval is subject to the following conditions: Standard Conditions of Approval: 1. No variances from the Maroon Creek Club Design Guidelines are given or implied bythis approval, except as specifically identified herein. 2. At the time of application for Final [Construction Document] Review, the owner must have; a. Signed and returned the Maroon Creek Club Master Association Compliance and Construction Completion Guaranty. This document can be downloaded from the Maroon Creek Club web page at www.williamlukes.com b. Provided a Letter of Credit or equivalent financial security in the amount of One Hundred Thousand Dollars [$100,000.00] provided in a form and from a source as is acceptable to the Association, all as provided in the Maroon Creek Club Master Association Compliance and Construction Completion Guaranty. The approved language and form for a letter of THE LAKESIDE STUDIO 801 LAKESIDE DRIVE CARBONDALE COLORADO 81623-3109 PHONE 970 963 8025 WWW.WILLIAM LU K E S.COM 38 credit is a-nable at www.williamlukes.com. c. The Road Impact Fee has been determined by MCC to not apply to Lots 2 and 3 of the Pfister Subdivision by virtue of language included in the Protective Covenants for both subdivisions. 3. Prior to the start of any construction on site, the owner must have completed the following: a. Signed and returned the Agreement Regarding Final Landscapeand Irrigation Plans which provides that the owner agrees to immediately cease all construction activity on the site upon written notice from the Association if the Site and Architecture Review Committee has not approved a final landscape plan. Such notice may be sent at any time after a date forty-five (45) calendar days after the date of Final (construction document) Architectural Approval. The owner must further stipulate that construction activity will not resume until a final landscape plan is approved by SARC. This document is required only if final landscape and grading approval is not received atthe same time as final architectural approval. This document is available at www.williamlukes.com . Specific Conditions of Approval: 1. Additional items required to be submitted to SARC for review and approval; a. All items required in the Design Guidelines for final review, b. Final samples of materials and colors for all exterior materials and driveway. c. Letters from MCC Golf and the owner(s) of the adjacent Pfister Lot 2 confirming their approval for any drawings and plans to be submitted to SARC. 2. A site inspection will be arranged by Andy Hecht and will include the architect, the Architectural Advisor, and David Chadbourne or other representatives of MCC Golf to review landscape plans, visibility of the home from the golf course, materials and colors, access and traffic, and new trees and irrigation responsibilities. 3. Drawings for final review must address the following; a. A landscape plan will be submitted that includes the following; i. A gap between existing stands of oaks, between the house and the 8th hole fairway / tee areas, is to be filled with trees and other landscaping as approved by MCC Golf and SARC, to effect screening of the house and pool areas from the golf course. ii. The landscape plan for this area should include a layering of plant materials including shrubberyand/or otherplants thatare lowerin heightthan trees sothat the under-story area is also fully screened, and so that the appearance from the golf course is natural looking and compatible with other landscaping around the golf course and along this hillside. iii. Maintenance responsibilities, including the installation and maintenance / operation of irrigation forthese screening trees, are to be worked out between the applicant and MCC Golf, and clearly shown on the documents submitted to SARC. iv. All existing stands of oaks and other vegetation between the house and the golf course are to be protected during construction by approved fencing and may not be removed or altered without SARC approval. v. Additional tall trees may be required in orderto mitigate the visibility of the house from the golf course and prevent undesirable reflections from larger areas of glass. b. W hile SARC is not opposed to granting a number of variances for this home, primarily with respecttoarchitecturaldesignand elements, the roofing materialsand allmaterials toward the upper parts of the house that may be visible from the golf course should comply with the Design Guidelines, and all exterior material colors should be respectful of those Design Guidelines. THE LAKESIDE STUDIO 801 LAKESIDE DRIVE CARBONDALE COLORADO 81623-3109 PHONE 970 963 8025 WWW.WILLIAMLUKES.COM 39 .. c. Location and use of any outdoor speakers must not create a nuisance for golfers on the nearby holes and paths of travel. 4. The schematic approval includes tentative variances for the following items as shown on the drawings, subject to Final Approval by the SARC; a. The extent of variances from the Design Guidelines that would be required to approve the massing, proposed exterior materials, and general design of this home would be numerous, but in recognition of the facts that 1) the home is not generally visible from other homes and roads within MCC, 2)the design of the home will primarily affect only the golf course and the adjacent Pfister Lot 3, and 3) this property is not within the actual boundaries of MCC, SARC is notopposed to including several variances in a subsequent final approval if the owner of the adjacent Lot 3 and MCC Golf have no objection to the design. 5. Noconstruction, staging, oraccess will be allowed within the MCC Golf Easementarea withoutthe prior written consent of MCC Golf. This area must be completely fenced during construction. 6. Temporary screening by means of fencing with "opaque" fabric or other privacy measures are generally required for construction sites that are immediately adjacent to golf play areas at MCC. It is likely that such measures will be required during the construction phase for this home, but the extent has not been determined. Construction fencing will be required to be placed, and approved by the Architectural Advisor, prior to any work on site. 7. Drawings submitted for final review will spell outconstruction management measures proposed to ensure safety as well as to prevent damage and unsightly conditions for the portions of Lazy Chair Road that have shared use with MCC Golf, especially from May through October. A project schedule will be submitted so that MCC Golf can evaluate the impact of construction on golf course operations during the next few years. 8. No air conditioning equipment was included in the review or approval. 9. No exterior lighting was included in the review or approval. 10. No masonry samples were included in the review or approval, the review was limited to areas that will be masonry. IMPORTANT NOTES: Construction that is either not in full accordance with the approved documents or that has not been approved in advance will result in substantial fines being levied against the property owner. Funds used to secure the Construction and Completion Guaranty may be collected by the Master Association to pay any fines that are assessed. Approval by the Site and Architecture Committee of the Maroon Creek Club Master Association does not constitute an assurance that the design of the project or the application complies with all applicable provisions of the County approvals for the Maroon Creek Club or that a building permit will be issued. It is the owner's responsibility to obtain building and other permits as may be required by the City of Aspen. THE LAKESIDE STUDIO 801 LAKESIDE DRIVE CARBONDALE COLORADO 81623-3109 PHoNE 970 963 8025 WWW.WILLIAMLUKES.COM 40 ' Please let me know if you ~ any questions regarding the Committee's ~on, or if we can be of any further assistance. We will send you separately one set of the approved plans for the owner's records. Cordially, THE LAKESIDE STUDIO for the Maroon Creek Club Master Association William Lukes, Architect Architectural Advisor to SARC copies: All SARC members Sarah Korpela, Joshua & Co. Association Management Hal Dishler Association Counsel David Chadbourne MCC General Manager THE LAKESIDE STUDIO 801 LAKESIDE DRIVE CARBONDALE COLORADO 81623-3109 PHoNE 970 963 8025 WWW,WILL[AMLUKES.COM 41 511 Lazy Chair Lot: 2 - 8040 Greenline Review Criteria Response Sec. 26.435.030 City ofAspen Land Use Code C. 8040 Greenline review standards. No development shall be permitted at, above or one hundred fifty (150) feet below the 8040 Greenline unless the Planning and Zoning Commission makes a determination that the proposed development complies with all requirements set forth below. Per City ofAspen Pre-Application Conference Summary, Lazy Chair Lot 2: "Conditions of these approvals included a prohibition o f development above 8060' above mean sea level because of the steep grade and natural vegetation in this portion of of the parcel." Also, according to the First Amendment Final Plat: "development in the hatched area above elevtaion 8060 is prohibited except as reasonably necessary for utility infrastructure, storm water mitigation, maintenance or restoration of native landscape, and wildfire mitigation needs:" 1. The parcel on which the proposed development is to be located is suitable for development considering its slope, ground stability characteristics, including mine subsidence and the 3,1 Set L 5 possibility of mudflow, rock falls and avalanche dangers. If the parcel is found to contain Ce Po,rr hazardous or toxic soils, the applicant shall stabilize and re-vegetate the soils or, where *11 WA'lAO-53 necessary, cause them to be removed from the site to a location acceptable to the City. Ne Poe-r See Civil, 6/6. The geotechnical reports will address the suitability of the site for the proposed residence. The civil application includes an erosion control plan to re vegetate and stabilize the cut slopes post final grading. 2. The proposed development does not have a significant adverse affect on the natural watershed, runoff, drainage, soil erosion or have consequent effects of water pollution. See Civil, 2/6. Runoff from impervious surfaces will be retained and infiltrated onsite. Over flows from retention facilities will be sized to release at the historical undeveloped flow rate as per the URMP rules. Rip Rap and vegetation will be used in swales to dissipate energy leaving the site to negate any downstream effects. The City ofAspen's Water Quality Capture Volume and Flood Detention Volume requirements can be met with the proposed site design. 3. The proposed development does not have a significant adverse affect on the air quality in the City. Hand Sweeping with brooms and shovels, and daily visual checks and removal of debris along the Project entry areas, the intersection of the driveway at Lazy Chair Road will be washed clean as needed. During Excavation, site watering will be performed by automatic sprinkler system as required to control dust. Additional site watering will be performed as necessary to limit air borne dust. As per City ofAspen Construction Management Plan Requirements Manual dated August 2010, no diesel engine emissions will exceed 40% opacity, except for starting or stationary operation not exceeding 10 seconds. 4. The design and location of any proposed development, road or trail is compatible with the terrain on the parcel on which the proposed development is to be located. See Civil, 3/6. A large portion of the structure is below grade. Offsite flows from above will be 42 .. routed around the structure before returning to their natural drainage pattern. There are no trials within the development area and the existing access off Tiehack Road will be used. There is a 30' access easement and there is no plan to go outside ofthis. 5. Any grading will minimize, to the extent practicable, disturbance to the terrain, vegetation and natural land features. See Civil grading plan. Soil nail walls are proposed for shoring to minimize the disturbance to the site. Grading is not to extend above the 8060' contour elevation. The only exception to the disturbance area elevation is for utility connections. No grading is proposed within the Maroon Creek Golf Course Easements. 6. The placement and clustering of structures will minimize the need for roads, limit cutting and grading, maintain open space and preserve the mountain as a scenic resource. There is only one structure situated near the center of the property. The access already exists and there is no request to for a second access. The road entering the site follows the natural terrain minimizing the need to for excessive cuts/fills. 7. Building height and bulk will be minimized and the structure will be designed to blend into the open character of the mountain. See Z 1 -013 thru Zl-015. The proposed structure is under maximum allowable height limit. Areas of roof and exterior walls will be vegetated roof and/or partially/fully below grade. 8. Sufficient water pressure and other utilities are available to service the proposed development. See Civil, 4/6. Currently there is a 2 million gallon City ofAspen owned potable water tank above the property to the west. The top of tank is at elevation of 8121', the upper finished floor of the house is proposed to be 8051.5'. The tank is 38' tall hence the bottom/outfall of the tank is estimated to be 8083'. This would indicate there is 31.5' of static head at the upper level of the house which is approximately 13.5 psi of static head. A booster pump may be required for the upper floors depending on flows. A Fire pump will be needed for the sprinkler system. In addition there is a hydrant located on site that will be moved closer to the driveway. Electrical service is from the west, sewer will be discharged to the manhole on the northeast. All other shallow utilities are proposed to be under the road entering the mechanical room 9. Adequate roads are available to serve the proposed development and said roads can be properly maintained. See Civil, 3/6 & 5/6. The driveway connects to an existing access, Lazy Chair Road, which interested Tiehack Road. The applicant will plow the access in the winter and there is room on the downhill side of the road for snow storage. 10. Adequate ingress and egress is available to the proposed development so as to ensure adequate access for fire protection and snow removal equipment. See Civil, 5/6. The onsite driveway is proposed to be 16' wide with inside turn radiuses of 29' and "Y" style turn around that is also 16' wide. Auto turn simulation was performed to demonstrate the 43 .. turning movement for a fire truck. Grades don't exceed 8% within the site driveways and turn rounds. 11. The adopted regulatory plans of the Open Space and Trails Board are implemented in the proposed development, to the greatest extent practical. This development dose not impact he open space plan. No disturbance will occur within the MCC easement to the east of the property without their prior approval. This would only include plantings to further screen views of the development from the golf course as directed by the MCC. 44 511 Lazy Chair Dr, Lots 2 & 3~ Vicinity Map Forum Phi Lazy Chair Lot 2 LLC 715 W Main St., Suite 204 Lazy Chair Lot 3 LLC Aspen, CO 81611 604 W. Main St Aspen, CO 81611 ~t_.3 ~T--14&LSTAGE Rn l , Â¢-b -X '11Â« 1 .TZ:7.'-'4 i'L /6 EL ''016%--- ./b or 1 : 3. K .4- 5 *-I Iii' i & 69 1 -- or w' .46-3 79--*<42, 14 I 74 f 97 j 2 13414 ~.4 3., < 2:,- . 11 4, 12 0 9 4&45 0.7 Â· I .1 1 0 0 ...-.- h. .Â· .1 ..14'G 'PAP Â· 4 rArt I::p~.~i5,~r -\ A- = -'1 ) Fi042267.-3+. 0 Â¥ :4. VATO" ./ MTN VIEW DR:~ *. ' :Â°,t> ---..2> 464 1, 4Â· 77'TÂ£3Â· r. 67(' Â· L ' in, ' pl, 6~Oll~BOWNY LN ~~ 445.~ 1 ' 21 ift# 45. h . 38 , 4460 ..6*0 i 4 for \7* 1 Â£0 0 60 43*4950*92/1 ',<6.â€ž1. 0 b P 11.6 331 . 1 :td'Â· i. L . ---4 Â¢ - Â£ -,4-I, ''id r-l/ --~--- c Jv - 42 , .4 11-Â« I & .,15 il 1 1'0 Pi <lp 4 1 81 4-,4&\ .tb & - Â·Â· Jf o 6%: / f fk . â‚¬:21 '24 i. 9 0 /4 U 14'/ 8/ 44. 4/ .9.64 %44 1-~1-4 'I~ Ir.1 19. 5 G AA\,2 5 I... 4.k . . 1 2# die : 1-1:-3 1#10 2735 Tl OS RBSW # A. r- f /~ 1-7~50.Ii 1 0 4 :il / . o SITE ~33 [r- 2 443 14,4, ./f Â« t #r--- . . 1 I . CK , NW.21,78 Ai,14 0 00 64 - -4/C, 8 2/ 47 f MARÂ©%272EEKAD - - /2./4. 1 -DI / C 1 6 r P tl A1 A. 1 ' 1 . -*f 'F 1 4: t. 44 r--*f 1 4 2 Â·c-Â·h31 2..Pt~ , 1 1 4 . C .It:. . 94 | i ibi I ' .J 38 7 3 i t=E;>$96!1# V 1 4- rf. . 1 . <u x.. a U 44'4-5 ~ 1- t=>t I. 541 71 1/ I . 11 .i I. -43 1 81.-71 .Lirre>14.11 1 .' L 4 1 0 1 1.4/ 1 E Ze' 14-:94% . . 44 :Jj 1 4 - 81 t 4"7Â· i . B '*ff 'M f- 43 1 8 v 1 9 5 1 d). LARKSPUR LN ~ 1 06 F-. --- C f.,1 Vaff ' Y : :-y- 14: 4,4 [2'CFZ-kt32 1 f 1/ 0 - 9 0 627 32 lon 2 41 -1 Oa :el -4-Â» 1 7 Capp- - - 0-13331*40 <#fiC&*24XFB f.-3 r N? *f- .. 511 Lazy Chair - Adjacent Properties within 300 feet ofArthor O Pfister Exemption Lots 2&3 Author O Pfister Exemption Lot 1: ID#: 273511302801 City ofAspen Attn Finance Dept 130 S Galena St Aspen, CO 81611 Lot 48: ID#: 273511309048 120 Pfeifer Place Bravura LLC 533 E Hopkins 3rd Floor Aspen, CO 81611 Lot 47: ID#: 273511309047 110 Pfeifer Place Bravura LLC 533 E Hopkins 3rd Floor Aspen, CO 81611 Lot A-D ID#: 273511209053 Maroon Creek LLC 10 Club Circle Aspen, CO 81611 Section: 11 Township: 10 Range: 85 Parcel of land in NE4SW4 of SEC 11-10-85 DESC BY M/B ID#: 273511300004 Kathryn A Finley 550 Lazy Chair Ranch Road Aspen, CO 81611 603 Maroon Creek Road ID#: 273511300005 S&J Investments II LLC 222 N Lasalle #800 Chicago, IL 60601 Lots H,J,K,L,M,N,P,Q,R,S & Roads ID#: 273511209055 Maroon Creek Club Master Association C/O Joshua and CO 300 S Hunter St Aspen, CO 81611 Lot 46: ID#: 273511309046 100 Pfeifer Place Crossgates LLC 533 E Hopkins Ave Aspen, CO 81611 46 PIE CTLITHOMPSON SOILS AND FOUNDATION INVESTIGATION 511 LAZY CHAIR ROAD LOT 2 ASPEN, COLORADO Prepared For: FORUM PHI ARCHITECTURE 715 West Main Street, Suite 204 Aspen, CO 81 Ptl Attention: Mr. Dustin Anderson, AIA Project No. GS05849-120 Revised July 18, 2014 .# .. t31 111 TABLE OF CONTENTS Con I jDvPE. SITE CONDITIONS .. ..... -. ..,e...........,...... 1 PROPOSED CONSTRUCTION.. ....... -...... 2 01 'Aqi In 1 U V WÂ» uÂ«FACE CONDITIONS.. ,.......,...... SLOPE STABILITY.....,.â€ž. EARTHWORK_..........._..... .v Excavabons ..-.-.......-. .. ....-. ..... w Excavation Retention....,..._ â€ž_.......â€ž..â€ž........ ...... ...... -..6 Construction Dewatering. -..-.. .....-. ... 6 Percolation Testing. . .. ... . 7 =OUNDATION. FLOOR SYSTEM AND SLABS-ON-GRADE Structurally Supported Floors 10 BELOW-GRADE CONSTRUCTION ......,,... SUBSURFACE DRAINAGE__. -. FOUNDATION WALL BACKFILL COMPACTION. .. -... Ag'.1 EARTH RETAINING WALLIS..-â€ž. - - . ., .... -. SURFACE DRAWAGE. 1 C CONCREIE. . ...*-. .-. .. 0 ADDITIONAL CONSULTATION, CONSTRUCTiON OBSERVATIONS AND MONITORING 16 GEOTECHNiCAL RISK. .~-...... i / ADDITIONAL SERVICES........... LiMITATIONS. ._ ...-.,0-.... .- ..-.. 1 3 FIGURE 1 - VICINITY MAP FIGURE 2 - LOCATIONS OF EXPLORATORY BORINGS FIGURES 3 AND 4 - SUMMARY LOGS OF EXPLORATORY BORINGS FIGURE 5 - PROPOSED BUILDING LOCATION AND BORING LOCATIONS F#GURE b SWELL/CONSOLIDATION TE.ST RESULTS FIGURES 7 AND 8- GRADATION TEST RESULTS FIGURES 9 AND 10 - EXTERIOR FOUNDATION WALL BRAINS FIGURE 11 - TYPICAL EARTH RETAINING WALL DRAIN TABLE 1 - SUMMARY OF LABORATORY TESTING EXHIBIT A - SLOPE STABILI'TY ANALYSIS EXHIBI 1 8- SURFACE DRAINAGE, IRRIGATION AND MAINTENANCE FORUM PHI ARCHITECTURE 341 LAZY CHA~R ROAD: LOT 2 PROJECT NO. 6805849-120 REVISED SAGS05849,300\12012. Reports\GSÂ©5849 12.0 Rl Revised.doc .. B=E:2 1 1 11 SCOPE This report presents results of our geotechnical investigation for the planned residence at 511 Lazy Chair Road, Lot 2 in Aspen, Colorado. We con- ducted this investigation to evaluate subsurface conditions at the site and provide geotechnical engineering recommendations for the proposed residence. Our re- port was prepared from data developed during field exploration, laboratory testing, engineering analysis and experience with similar conditions. The report includes a description of the subsurface conditions encountered in our exploratory borings, and geotechnical engineering recommendations for design and construction of the foundations, floor systems, belowwgrade walls, drain systems and for details influ- enced by the subsoils. The scope of services was described in a Service :Agree- ment GS 14-0126. dated March 12, 2014 and agreement GS-14-170, June 3,2014. SITE CONDITIONS The property is located at the terminus of Lazy Chair Road in Aspen, Colo- rado. A vicinity map is shown on Figure 1 and a plan view of existina conditions on the lot is shown on Figure 2. An existing two-story residence is on the lot. An approximately 6 foot high retaining wall is south of the garage. The average ground surface slope is +6 20 percent toward the east-northeast in the existing building area. Areas of slopes above the existing residence and adjacent area are generally between 20 to 30 percent. Vegetation on the lot consists of sparse weeds and grasses, brush and irrigated landscaping. FORUM PHi ARCHITECTURE 1 511 LAZY CHAR ROAD~ LOT 2 PROJECT NO. (3305849Â·120 REVISED SAGS05849.000\1202,2. Reports,GS05849 120 Rl Revised.doc .. 32 I . . Existing Site Conditions PROPOSED CONSTRUCTION The existing residence on the lot will be deconstructed, The propose resi dense will be two stories tail above-grade and two stories below-grade. A crawl space will be below the lowest floor level in some areas. We believe an approxi- mately 45 foot excavation into the existing hillside will be required at the southwest corner of the proposed residence. The basement level floor is planned at eleva- tion 8026 feet. The sub-basement level floor is planned at elevation 8018 feet. An approximately 4 foot crawl space/mechanical area is planned below the sub- basement level (elevation 8014). A garage will be on the main level of the resi- dence and will be accessed from Lazy Chair Road. Several retaining walls are planned around the residence. FORUM PHI ARCHITECTURE 2 511 LAZY CHAIR ROAD LOT 2 PROJECT NO. GS05849-120 REVISED S:\GS{)5849000'12012 Report5 6505849 120 Rl Revised doc mil- .. 31 SUBSURFACE CONDITIONS Subsurface conditions were investigated by drilling four exploratory borings (TH-1 through TH-4) at the approximate locations shown on Figures 2 and 5. Ex- ploratory borings TH-1 and TH-2 for this investigation were drilled on April 24 2014 with 4-inch diameter, continuous-flight solid-stem auger and a track-mounted drill rig. Exploratory borings TH-3 and TH-4 were drilied on June 25 and 26, 2014 with an air rotary percussion system and an all terrain vehicle drill rig. Exploratory drilling was directed by our project engineer or principal engineer who logged the soils and bedrock encountered in the borings and obtained samples. Graphic logs of the soils and bedrock encountered in our exploratory borings are shown on Fig- ures 3 and 4. Our borings penetrated about 1 foot of organic sandy clay "topsoil", nil to 13 feet of sandy clay with occasional gravels and 14.5 to 29 feet of clayey to silty gravel with cobbles and boulders underlain by bedrock to the maximum drilled depth of 60 feet below the existing ground surface. Free ground water was art- countered at depths of 23.5 and 29 feet in our exploratory borings TH-1 and TH-2 on the day of drilling. Observations during drilling and results of penetration re- sistance tests indicated the clay was medium stiff to stiff and the gravel was dense to very dense. The shale bedrock was very hard. Borings TH-1, TH-3 and TH-4 were piped to facilitate future measurements of ground water. Our experience is that water flows, much of the year, on top of the bedrock. It is common to find ar- eas of perched water and isolated areas of high groundwater in excavations made in spring and early summer in the vicinity of the property. The soils above the bedrock included large gravel and cobbles. Meaningful samples for laboratory testing could not be obtained from the exploratory borings The sampler used to obtain soil samples has a tip with a 1.5 inch diameter open- FORUM PHI ARCHITECTURE 3 51 1 LAZY CHAIR ROAD: L.OT 2 PROJECT NO. GS05849-120 REVISED SAGS05849.000\120:32. Regorts\GS05849 120 Rl Revised.doc .. 3Â·2=U7351.-Â·: HIM ing. Rocks with diameters larger than 1.5 inches are not retrieved. Therefore, la- boratory testing only reflects the matrix soils and smaller diameter rocks. Samples representative of the actual in-situ soils could not be practically obtained. We performed gradation testing on four solls samples. The soils contained 13 to 37 percent gravels, 26 to 46 percent sand and 26 to 45 percent silt and clay size particles (passing the No. 200 sieve). A sample of the clay was selected for one dimensional swell-consolidation testing. The sample was wetted under an applied load of 1,000 psf and the resulting volume change measured. The sam- pie exhibited 0.1 percent consolidation when wetted. Swell-consolidation test re- suits are shown on Figure 6. Gradation test results are shown on Figures 7 and 8. Laboratory test results are summarized on Table 1. SLOPE STABILITY We performed a preliminary slope stability analysis to understand earth re- tention requirements to construct the residence. The slope above the planned building footprint is stable in its current configuration. We believe the existing fac- tor of safety (FOS) to be near 2.3. The planned excavation, if not retained, would result in an unacceptable FOS. We modeled the planned excavation with an earth retention force. Our cursory model indicates an FOS similar to the existing FOS can be achieved. CTL should provide the actual earth retention design for this project. Earth retention systems to allow construction of the new residence as currently planned should not significantly reduce the stability of the slope. Appen- dix A includes figures providing partial output from our slope stability evaluation. The slope should be monitored for movement during construction. Remedial measures may be required if movement is detected. To mitigate the risk of shal- low sloughing and surface raveling, the existing natural vegetation on the slope should be maintained in its current state or improved to provide more complete ground cover Vegetation with robust, deep root systems is preferable. FORUM PHI ARCHITECTURE 4 511 LAZY CHAIR ROAD, LOT 2 PROJECT NO. GS05849-120 REVISED St\GS05849.000\12012. Reports\GS05849 120 Rl Revised.doe .. EARTHWORK Excavations Deep excavations (up to +/- 45 feet) will be required to construct the crawlspace/mechanical level of the residence. We anticipate excavations will ex- pose sandy clay above clayey to silty gravel with cobbies and boulders underlain by bedrock. We anticipate that excavation in the overburden soils can be accom- plished using conventional, extra heavy-duty excavation equipment. Scattered large boulders shouid be anticipated. Our experience is that a pneumatic hammer attached to a trackhoe can excavate the large boulders and facilitate excavations in the bedrock. The installation of grout columns as pre-shoring for soils nailing of the excavation face would aid in the excavation process by pre-splitting the bed. rock. Pre-splitting would make excavations easier and reduce the potential for 'rock excavation" requiring blasting. Excavations must be sloped or braced to meet local, state and federal safe- ty regulations. Where excavations cannot be laid back to safe slopes, earth reten- tion will be required. We believe that the majority of excavations for the residence cannot be laid back to safe slopes at this site. The sandy clay will classify as a Type B soil and the gravels will classify as Type C soils based on OSHA stand- ards governing excavations. Temporary slopes deeper than 4 feet should be no steeper than 1 to 1 (horizontal to vertical) in Type B soils and 1.5 to 1 in Type C soils. Bedrock will likely classify as stable rock at the time of excavation; however, because Of the potential for adverse bedding and water flowing through the bed- rock and the weathering of the exposed bedrock, we believe the bedrock should be considered a Type A soil. Retention of the bedrock will be required. Contrac- tors are responsible for site safety and providing and maintaining safe and stable excavations. Contractors should identify the soils encountered and ensure that FORUM PHI ARCHITECTURE 5 511 LAZY CHAiR ROAD, LOT 2 PROJECT NO. GS05849Â·120 REVISED SAGS05849.000' 12012, Reports\GS05849 120 Rl Revised.doc .. Iii i OSHA standards are met. An excavation plan should be developed by the con- tractor, Excavation Retention To achieve safe and stable excavations and maintain the existing stability on the property and between the property and adjacent properties, earth retention will be needed. Earth retention systems may include a combination of soil i tails, micropiles, drilled shafts and post-tensioned anchors. Temporary construction dewatering will likely be required. There are two general concepts for excavation retention: 1) permanent re- tention systems (with integrated foundation walls or with separate foundation walls) that are designed for the life of the building; or 2) temporary retention sys- tems (usually with separate foundation walls) that provide a safe and stable exca- vation during building construction. Where temporary earth retention is installed, the foundation wall is located in front of the retained face and needs to be de- signed for full lateral earth pressure. Permanent excavation retention systems can reduce lateral earth pressures on foundation walls and thus reduce the required reinforcement in, and the thickness of the walls. Furthermore, permanent excava- lion retention systems with integrated building foundation walls typically require less excavation outside the perimeter of buildings. Temporary retention systems generally involve lower construction costs of the retainage system; however, there is no reduction of lateral earth pressures applied to building foundation walls. Construction DewaÂ®.rinit Ground>water was encountered at 29 and 23.5 feet deep (el = 8005 to 8006.5) during our field investigation. We measured groundwater at 20 feet deep (el = 8014) in our boring TH-1 several days after drilling. Groundwaterwas not found during the drilling of TH-3 and TH-4; these borings were eased with PVC FORUM PHI ARCHITECTURE 6 511 LAZY CHAjR ROAD. LOT 2 PROJECT NO. GS05849-120 REVISED SAGS05849.000\120\2. Reports\GS05849 120 Rl Revised.de: .. pipe to allow future measurements to groundwater. Groundwater will rise higher in times of higher snowfall or faster snowmelt. Excavations will likely intercept groundwater in isolated natural drainage paths and on the bedrock. Large quanti- ties of seepage may be encountered during spring snowmelt PeÂ£Â§914*op_Ifts-ti n We performed percolation testing in our percolation hole drilied at the ap proximate location shown on Figure 2. The testing was performed on May 2, 2014 in the clayey to silty gravel with cobbles and boulders. The testing resulted in a percolation rate of the gravel soils of about 30 minutes per inch. FOUNDATION We anticipate shale bedrock will be found at planned excavation depths below most of the western two-thirds of the planned excavation. Clayey to silty gravels with some cobbles and boulders and a maximum thickness of about 10 feet will be found in excavations made to the eastern one-third of the excavation. To mitigate future differential movement related to variable foundation support, we recommend the residence be founded on footing foundations that are supported by the bedrock. If the residence foundation is supported on footing foundations on both the gravel and bedrock, differential movement of the foundation needs to be considered. We suggest to assume no movement where footings are on bed- rock and 1 percent compression times the thickness where footings are on gravel It may be appropriate to reach the bedrock for foundation bearing by utilizing drilled shafts to pass through the overburden graveL Basically the shafts would result in round footings. A representative of our firm should be called to observe soils in the founda- tion excavation and check that conditions are as anticipated and suitable for sup- FORUM PHI ARCHITECTURE 7 511 LAZY CHAIR ROAD, LOT 2 PROJECT NO. GS05849-120 REVISED S:IGSt)5849.000\120#2. Reports\GSÂ¢)5849 120 Rl Revised.doc .. port of the foundation as designed. Recommended design and construction crite- ria for footings are presented below. 1. Footing foundations should be supported by the bedrock. Soils loosened during excavation or the forming process for the footings should be removed, or the soils can be re-compacted prior to placing concrete. Differential settlement and potential building movement could be reduced if the entire foundation is supported on bedrock. 2. Footings supported by the bedrock should be designed for a maxi- mum allowable soil pressure of 8,000 psf 3 A friction factor of 0.45 can be used to calculate resistance to sliding between concrete footings and bedrock. 4. Continuous wall footings should have a minimum width of at least 16 inches. Foundations for isolated columns should have minimum diw mensions of 24 inches by 24 inches. Larger sizes will be required. based upon anticipated foundation loads. 5. Grade beams and foundation walls should be well reinforced to span undisclosed loose or soft soil pockets and resist lateral earth pres- sures. We recommend reinforcement sufficient to span an unsup- ported distance of at least 12 feet. Reinforcement should be deâ€ž signed by the structural engineer. 6. The soils under exterior footings shouid be protected from freezing. We recommend the bottom of footings be constructed ata depth of at least 42 inches below finished exterior grades. The applicable building department should be consulted regarding required frost protection depth. FLOOR SYSTEM AND SLABS-ON-GRADE Subgrade level floors are anticipated to be slabs-on-grade in some areas and structurally supported above crawl spaces in other areas. If the slabs are supported on both the gravel and bedrock, differential settlement of the slabs mav occur. We would anticipate no movement of slabs supported on bedrock and 0.5 percent compression times the gravel thickness for slab supported on gravel. FORUM PHI ARCHITECTURE 8 511 LAZY CHAIR ROAD, LOT 2 PROJECT NO. GS05849-120 REVISED SAG 505849.000\1202. Reports\G 30584 9 120 R 1 Revised, doc .. j lift Slab underdrain and crawl space floor drain systems as described in the following SUBSURFACE DRAINAGE section should be provided below the floors. Backfill below exterior slabs-on-grade will settle. In areas of deep backfill, a positive alter- native to reduce slab movement is provision of a structurally supported floor We recommend the following precautions for slab-on-grade construction at this site. 1. Slabs should be separated from wall footings and column pads with slip joints which allow free vertical movement of the slabs. 2. Underslab plumbing should be pressure tested for leaks before the slabs are poured. Plumbing and utilities which pass through slabs should be isolated from the slabs with sleeves and provided with flexible couplings to slab-supported appliances. 3. Exterior patio and porch slabs should be isolated from the residence, These slabs should be well-reinforced to function as independent units. 4. Frequent control joints should be provided, in accordance with Amer- ican Concrete Institute (ACI) recommendations, to reduce problems associated with shrinkage and curling. 5. The International Building Code (IBC) or International Residential Code (IRC) require a vapor retarder be placed between the base course or subgrade soils and concrete slab-on-grade floors. The merits of installation of a vapor retarder below fioor slabs depend on the sensitivity of floor coverings and building to moisture. A properly installed vapor retarder (10 mil minimum) is more beneficial below concrete slab-on-grade floors where floor coverings, painted floor surfaces or products stored on the floor will be sensitive to moisture. The vapor retarder is most effective when concrete is placed directly on top of it. A sand or gravel leveling course should not b placed between the vapor retarder and the floor slab. The placement of concrete on the vapor retarder may increase the risk of shrinkage cracking and curling. Use of concrete with reduced shrinkage char- acteristics including minimized water content, maximized coarse ag- gregate content, and reasonably low slump will reduce the risk of shrinkage cracking and curling. Considerations and recommenda- tions for the installation of vapor retarders below concrete slabs are outlined in Section 3.2.3 of the 2003 report of American Concrete In- FORUM PHI ARCHITECTURE 9 511 LAZY CHAIR ROAD, LOT 2 PROJECT NO. GS05849-120 REVISED SAGS05849 00011202. Reports\GS05849 120 R 1 Revised.d oc .. 1111 stitute (ACI) Committee 302, "Guide for Concrete Floor and Slab Construction (ACI 302.R-96)". St.[.uctu.ral s Supported Floors A structural floor is supported by the foundation system. Design and con- struction issues associated with structural floors include ventilation and lateral loads. Where structurally supported floors are installed over a crawl space, the required air space depends on the materials used to construct the floor and the potential expansion of the underlying soils. Building codes require a clear space of 18 inches between exposed earth and untreated wood floor components. For non- organic systems, we recommend a minimum clear space of 12 inches. This min- imum clear space should be maintained between any point on the underside of the floor system (including beams, piumbing pipes and floor drain traps) and the soils. Where structurally supported floors are used, utility connections. including water, gas, air duct, and exhaust stack connections to floor supported appliances should be capable of absorbing some deflection of the floor. Plumbing that passes through the floor should ideally be hung from the underside of the structural floor and not laid on the bottom of the excavation. This configuration may not be achievable for some parts of the installation. It is prudent to maintain the minimum clear space below all plumbing lines. if trenching below the lines is necessant we recommend sloping these trenches so they discharge to the foundation drain. Control of humidity in crawl spaces ts important for indoor air qualitv and performance of wood floor systems. We believe the best current practices to con- trol humidity involve the use of a vapor retarder or vapor barrier CIO mil minimum) placed on the soils below accessible subfloor areas. The vapor retarder/barrier should be sealed at joints and attached to concrete foundation elements. A posh tive approach to protect wood floors above crawl spaces is to install a mechanical FORUM PHI ARCHITECTURE 10 511 LAZY CHAIR ROAD, LOT 2 PROJECT NO. GS05849-120 REVISED S:\GS05849 00011209. Reportu.GS05849 120 Rl Revised.doc: .. --1113 ventilation system controlled by a hurnidistat in crawl space areas. When a pre- set humidity is determined, mechanical systems should activate to create airflow in the space, BELOW-GRADE CONSTRUCTION Foundation walls which extend below-grade should be designed for lateral earth pressures where backfill is not present to about the same extent on both sides of the wall. Many factors affect the values of the design lateral earth pres- sure. These factors include, but are not limited to, the type, compaction, slope and drainage of the backfill, and the rigidity of the wall against rotation and deflec- tion. For a very rigid foundation wall where negligible or very little deflection will occur, an "at-rest" lateral earth pressure should be used in design. For walls which can deflect or rotate 0.5 to 1 percent of wail height (depending upon the backfill types), lower "active" lateral earth pressures are appropriate. If the on-site soils are used as backfili. we recommend design of below- grade walls using an equivalent fluid density of at least 55 pof for this site. This equivalent density does not include allowances for sloping backfill, surcharges or hydrostatic pressures. Backfill placed adjacent to foundation wall exteriors should be placed in accordance with the recommendations in the FOUNDATION WALL BACKFILL COMPACTION section. Exterior flatwork such as patios and exterior columns which are supported on backfill should be expected to settle and crack. Where movement and cracking is not considered acceptable, the structures should be structurally supported. FORUM PHI ARCHITECTURE 11 511 UTY CHAR ROAD, LOT 2 PROJECT NO. GS05849-120 REVISED S.10605849.000\1202. Reportstâ‚¬1605849 120 Rl Revised.de. .. lilli SUBSURFACE DRAINAGE We anticipate that subsurface water will flow towards the site at elevations above the planned subgrade level. The water will need to be collected in perma- nent dewatering systems (drains). We are providing recommendations for a per- manent drainage system. We have observed occasional incidents of water in basement window wells after construction. We recommend considering a drain pipe to connect the bottom of window wells to the foundation drain. Section R310.2.2 of the 2012 IRC re- quires a drain in the window wells. We recommend an exterior foundation drain be installed around the perim- eter and adjacent to below-grade interior foundation walls where the foundation steps down the slope (if any). A washed rock layer with an embedded PVC drain pipe network should be provided under below-grade floor slabs and in crawl space areas. The exterior foundation drains should consist of 4 inch diameter, rigid, slot- ted PVC pipe encased in free draining gravel. A prefabricated drainage compo- site should be placed adjacent to foundation walls. Care should be taken during backfill operations to prevent damage to drainage composites. The drain should lead to a sump pit where water can be removed by pumping. Gravity outlets should be protected from clogging and freezing. The drain outlets should be checked at least twice each year to verify they are not blocked. Installation of clean outs along the drain pipes is recommended. Slab-on-grade floors should be protected from wetting by installation of an under slab blanket drain. We recommend constructing underslab drains consist- ing of 2-inch diameter, slotted PVC pipe installed on 10 to 12 foot centers and embedded in at least 6 inches of washed gravel. The pipes should convey water FORUM PHI ARCHITECTURE 12 511 LAZY CHAIR ROAD, LOT 2 PROJECT NO. GS05849-120 REVISED SAGS05849.000\120~2. Reports\GS05849 120 Rl Revised.doc .. lilli to perimeter drain collector pipes. Placement of a moisture retarder above the washed rock layer is required in the International Residential Code to mitigate the potential for water vapor transmission through floor slabs. Typical foundation and blanket drain details are shown on Figures 9 and 10. FOUNDATION WALL BACKFILL COMPACTION Settlement of foundation wall and utility trench backfill can cause damage to concrete flatwork and/or result in poor drainage conditions. Compaction of backfill can reduce settlement. Attempts to compact backfill near foundations to a high degree can cause damage to foundation walls and window wells and may increase lateral pressures on the foundation walls. The potential for cracking of a foundation wall can vary widely based on many factors, including the degree of compaction achieved, the weight and type of compaction equipment utilized, the structural design of the wall, the strength of the concrete at the time of backfill compaction, and the presence of temporary or permanent bracing. Backfill placed adjacent to foundation wall exteriors should be free of or- ganic matter, debris and rocks larger than about 3 inches in diameter. Backfill should be moisture conditioned to within 2 percent of optimum moisture content and compacted to about 90 to 95 percent of standard Proctor (ASTM D 698) max- imum dry density. We recommend that density and moisture content of backfill be tested during placement. The top 1 to 2 feet of backfill should consist of a clayey soil to limit surface water infiltration. Proper moisture conditioning of backfill is as important as compaction, be- cause settlement commonly occurs in response to wetting. The addition of water complicates the backfill process, especially during cold weather. Frozen soils are not considered suitable for use as backfill because excessive settlement can re- suit when the frozen materials thaw. FORUM PHI ARCHITECTURE 13 511 LAZY CHAIR ROAD, LOT 2 PROJECT NO. GS05849.120 REVISED SAGS05849.000\120\2. Reports\GS05849 120 Rl Revised.doc .. lilli Precautions should be taken when backfilling against below-grade walls. Temporary bracing of comparatively long, straight sections of walls should be used to limit damage to walls during the compaction process. Waiting at least seven days after the walls are placed to allow the concrete to gain strength can also reduce the risk of damage. Compaction of fill placed beneath and next to window wells, counterforts, and grade beams may be difficult to achieve without damaging these building elements. Proper moisture conditioning of the fill prior to placement in these areas will help reduce potential settlement. Foundation wall backfill may be between the face of earth retention and the foundation walls. The width of fill will vary based on the required earth retention system. Widths of 1 to 3 feet are common for the type of construction planned. Well placed fill will likely settle about one percent of fill thickness. Where concrete flatwork is placed on the fill, this amount of settlement may not be considered ac- ceptable. Options to reduce the potential settlement include structurally support- ing the flatwork or supporting the flatwork on materials that would settle less or more uniformly than soils. We believe the use of expanded polystyrene (EPS, Geofoam) or flowable fill (lean mix concrete) could be used to reduce settlement. Subsequent to the development of earth retention plans, we can provide backfill recommendations to mitigate the potential for backfill settlement adversely effect- ing concrete flatwork performance. EARTH RETAINING WALLS Reinforced concrete retaining walls may be constructed. Reinforced con- crete retaining walls can be supported on the natural gravel soils or bedrock. De- sign criteria for retaining walls can be provided once the actual locations and bob tom of wall locations are known. FORUM PHI ARCHITECTURE 14 511 LAZY CHAIR ROAD, LOT 2 PROJECT NO. GS05849-120 REVISED SAGS05849.000\120\2 Reports\GS05849 120 Rl Revised.doc .. Retaining walls which can rotate should be designed to resist "active" lab eral earth pressures calculated using an equivalent fluid density of at least 40 pcf. Retaining walls with reinforcement that is tied into building foundation walls that are not free to rotate should be designed to resist "at rest" lateral earth pressures using an equivalent fluid density of at least 55 pcf. A passive earth pressure of 300 pcf can be used to calculate resistance from sliding for permanent embed- ment depths. These pressures do not include allowances for sloping backfill or hydrostatic pressures. Backfill behind retaining walls and in front of retaining wall footings should be placed and compacted as outlined in the BACKFILL COMPACTION section. A drain will be needed behind retaining walls. Figure 11 shows a typical earth retaining wall drain. SURFACE DRAINAGE Proper design, construction, and maintenance of surface drainage is critical to the satisfactory performance of foundations, slabs-on-grade, and other improve- ments. Landscaping and irrigation practices will also affect performance. Exhibit A contains our recommendations for surface drainage, irrigation, and maintenance. CONCRETE Concrete in contact with soil can be subject to sulfate attack. We tested one soil sample for water soluble sulfate concentrations. The tested sample con- tained 0.00 percent water soluble sulfates. For this level of sulfate concentration, AC\ 332-08 Code Requirements for Residential Concrete indicates there are no special requirements for sulfate resistance. In our experience, superficial damage may occur to the exposed surfaces of highly permeable concrete, even though sulfate levels are relatively low. To FORUM PHI ARCHITECTURE 15 511 LAZY CHAIR ROAD, LOT 2 PROJECT NO. GS05849-120 REVISED SAGS05849.000\120\2. Reports\GS05849 120 Rl Revised.doc e . T control this risk and to resist freeze-thaw deterioration, the water-to-cementitious materials ratio should not exceed 0.50 for concrete in contact with soils that are likely to stay moist due to surface drainage or high water tables. Concrete should have a total air content of 6% +/- 1.5%. We advocate all foundation walls and grade beams in contact with the subsoils (including the inside and outside faces of garage and crawl space grade beams) be damp-proofed. ADDITIONAL CONSULTATION, CONSTRUCTION OBSERVATIONS AND MONITORING This report has been prepared for the exclusive use of Forum Phi Architec- ture and the design team for the purpose of providing geotechnical design and construction criteria for the proposed project. The information, conclusions, and recommendations presented herein are based upon consideration of many factors including, but not limited to, the type of structures proposed, the geologic setting, and the subsurface conditions encountered. The conclusions and recommenda- tions contained in the report are not valid for use by others. Standards of practice evolve in geotechnical engineering. The recommendations provided are appropri- ate for about three years. If the proposed project is not constructed within about three years, we should be contacted to determine if we should update this report. We recommend that CTL I Thompson, Inc. provide construction observa- tion services to allow us the opportunity to verify whether soil conditions are con- sistent with those found during this investigation. If others perform these observa- tions, they must accept responsibility to judge whether the recommendations in this report remain appropriate. FORUM PHI ARCHITECTURE 16 511 LAZY CHAIR ROAD, LOT 2 PROJECT NO. GS05849-120 REVISED SAGS05849000'12012. ReportstGS05849 120 Rl Revised.doc .. lilli- GEOTECHNICAL RISK The concept of risk is an important aspect with any geotechnical evaluation, primarily because the methods used to develop geotechnical recommendations do not comprise an exact science. We never have complete knowledge of subsur- face conditions. Our analysis must be tempered with engineering judgment and experience. Therefore, the recommendations presented in any geotechnical eval- uation should not be considered risk-free. We cannot provide a guarantee that the interaction between the soils and a proposed structure will be as desired or in- tended. Our recommendations represent our judgment of those measures that are necessary to increase the chances that the structures will perform satisfactorily. It is critical that all recommendations in this report are followed during construction. Home owners must assume responsibility for maintaining the structure and use appropriate practices regarding drainage and landscaping. ADDITIONAL SERVICES Additional geotechnical engineering services are required based on the planned construction. We recommend that CTL I Thompson, Inc. provide the fol- lowing additional geotechnical services: 1. Design of earth retention systems, including detailed analysis of the stability of the slope above and below the planned construction; 2. Review of the excavation plans; 3. Review of final building plans; and 4. Construction observations and materials testing. FORUM PHI ARCHITECTURE 17 511 LAZY CHAIR ROAD, LOT 2 PROJECT NO. GS05849-120 REVISED SAGS05849.000\12012. Reports\GS05849 120 Rl Revised.doc .. LIMITATIONS Our exploratory borings were located in accessible areas. The locations of our borings were limited by utilities, the existing residence, and steep slopes on the lot. Subsurface conditions not indicated by our borings will occur. A repre- sentative of our firm should be called to observe and test fill placement and ob- serve the completed foundation excavation to confirm that the exposed soils are suitable for support of the footings as designed. This investigation was conducted in a manner consistent with that level of care and skill ordinarily exercised by geotechnical engineers currently practicing under similar conditions in the locality of this project. No warranty, express or im- plied, is made. If we can be of further service in discussing the contents of this report, please call. CTL I THOMPSON, INC. r /1- / '21,8 i : Â®4 FeÂ¢Â·din&1'4&4 ~1 8Â§'hc~ W[Bnager -4-IRC. 4 8/0 NAL CC: Via email danderson@forumphi.com FORUM PHI ARCHITECTURE 18 511 LAZY CHAIR ROAD. LOT 2 PROJECT NO. GS05849120 REVISED SAGS05849.000112012 Reports\GS05849 120 Rl Revised.doc . 0 SCALE: 1' = 2,000 . 4.yl \, \42:71,\ -*f*43'c-1:#.. r. -1 - 9 .25j#: t.' "41>23.'1 6271 - =t . 4 -10 51>/ 2 Â· AI 97*4-1 ' -*t. c'ft; - *I /,G-%.V,\14) I iurl - n ... *08/nY'/9. Ir - . & 3 L. '.. .. . ..i., :*f.-2.47'Y :3:.UAL? Cjr-40 -= V . '.. Vh. ... ....1 . Jhy 41 4 Irdieo Grodh#, t. 0 =96..14 . A. 04,12 . ' ):. -t# 4. 129% .0 6; 6 - .Â·>9Â°1*SE -1 ,(31#924?.l . ..2 L. I .4 .... . 0 : 44 1.. ./ ....t. . Irl' 6 - 2,7.-1/W*r . $-~ . 2 41'i : l....:.-94-2 9-2 22?. Â·Â·' :. 4 1 '191' 88:~ F '-2 1:4.6.:tz,2$*1. 730 + 1 W â€¢,r t:Â»45.6:>- 2--4 . \ 4 ., 86 . : :.. :314.L;Xy?FÂ« f ju ' C 'Fi, 1 ,.<33.. Y\ ,-.. I . a.. -- 4%442 68Â·t *.3.~::94#*... .. 81.- . 4 9 44 . 4 ., 4. :, F /1,< ,--- >Â¢\ ,1 *Fif4%44% r , , Aly< 46 < . - - - .Â·:Â·:1.-72. :('; 4 / 7% #f *hp~ 32"e= 5,~ b . 8 6, 4 :u'. /64\4,5 . t.Â»ae. 911)/- 1,Â·. ; 70 <19%1 C Ip/*. eh. *1 44 ...be *, u f 144\ 4 4: yzehp . , B--I'lly,Xk : .1 h f . 1.17 'Wilillâ€¢ ;-,9 Â· 'rh>/ 4 2 , 41* "Al N 4, ]( ' J.t,14:QUI 9.30 0 ./ 4 ...,â€¢~ap \ ...6 '* 1 Tal<" u . . 6 1 , ' 1 'j '. dG h. 4 .Rig 7......0.09'. i . 9, & --/4 :v - , 4 .1 U i. i -' IQFO./ 1.4 6 1 ; 11 44~341&1 3Â§164 .9, 1 2~)AÂ¢ ...f 1-- - r ' #Ir#-, *0= 4., ort h 7 51,ws<'d<~bÂ£r~ .//M- 7/ 1 ,-7' 43&>*dy ,54 ..'. , ./ 912 ....~AlTt((UR- -441! 1 I â„¢t. I . ./ . I I V. 4. -4.4 4 .. ix -1 N-b 0. 16. -- - 1 r .. t.C . 4 . I :r 7 : ..1 . -X , .a , ' spen 9*7 1* 0 - - â€¢ - .. Autilip i ' .. 1 0 1, --Wlter, - - --~ Â·-Â· 1 i r , "' 2."q' *4*NN 19.1 .7.-4027 Vicinity Map FORUM PHI ARCH[TECTURE 611 LAZY CHAIR ROAD, LOT 2 Project No. GS05849-120 Fig. 1 . ~,1-â‚¬fÂ» lit*S . I ,-ls 05849 â€¢ .7 18 Â· 14 ERW ... 3, Septic ~ NOTE: Lids\.0 LOCATIONS OF EXPLORATORY _- 57727'55'*~ BORINGS ARE APPROXIMATE. .9 0 4 SCALE: 1 '= 40' ---221 S i -0 - 0 e 9 e 0 \ 1 q 0 \ 4 ju rn '55"E F.F. 8040.2 i Existing House 2 1 i TA,~-2 . \ 70.00 PERÂ¢1 i /~ HOLE\ 444 0 i 4) it /J -il / e ARY 1 .Ill 1/ - 111 \42 \. Concrete_. - - Asphalt \ 0 \\ % , 1,th /44 0 11 9 01 ill 9 ))1111,17 0,/ \8 3041/ 4 -+ #/r -1 0 Locations of 260.00 Exploratory Borings and 46 1- Found No. 5 Rebor CD Existing FORUM PHI ARCHI-rECTURE ~~ ~ L.S. #9184 ~ . # Conditions with Yellow Plastic C~p 511 LAZY CHAIR ROAD, LOT 2 Project No. GS05849-120 FIg. 2 e~2* (0Â»2772079 ~ City CS05849_Fe Re 07/18/14 ERN TH-1 TH-2 TH-3 TH-4 P-1 El. 8034 El. 8030 El. 8050 El. 8050 El. 8029 --0 39 9 35/ - 17 0% A 13; / ANrtaPPEED % 2 , 1- / LOWEST ..0 ..1 LEVEL , ~616,915, 615 5/12 ELEVATION t 4 (8027) -5 '6155/12 Â¢4 4 .1.1 - I --1 * f - / - ANTICIPATED *Ct; LONEST 2 I. __ / ~~~TION 1 3 4 0027) 22 2 - / 110/12 ~b 1 50/10 .~., -Of: -10 /3 - f A 50/1 0 / 4 i Â«4 :4 A *1 Â¢4 45 75 ~77 50/12 70.-1 Â·4-139/12 - * /'1 30/2 e. Vio .4 1> 17 50113 ~ 50/7 -20 , t. p -1 : 5011 2 - 2. --- < 31/6.19/5 *- 1 -25 6 / ;0 27/6,33/3 39' - 74-1 SZ Â·- / 70.150/3 -- c~ I 34/6,16/3 -Â·-- 30 ' Â¥0 J 14 50/1 24 ': 9/ 70 03 - 123/5,2713 --. m 50/4 /8. 1 ANTICIPATED LOWEST UEVEL - ELEVATION (8010) -Â· 40 50/0 -45 -50 50/1 -55 50/0 60 SUMMARY LOGS OF EXPLORATORY BORINGS FORUM PHI ARCHITECTURE 511 LAZY CHAIR ROAD, LOT 2 PROJECT NO. GS05849-120 I Ld- 4- .Pol 1333-Hld3a .. 31IF LEGEND: 1 SANDY CLAY "TOPSOILL ORGANICS, MOIST, BROWN. ~ CLAY, SANDY WITH OCCASIONAL GRAVEL, MEDIUM STIFF TO STIFF TO STIFF, MOIST, BROWN, RUST ~T-~ GRAVE CLAYEY TO SILTY, COBBLES AND BOULDERS, DENSE TO VERY DENSE, MOIST TO [--/| WET, BROWN, RUST, GRAY. ~ SHALE BEDROCK, VERY HARD, WET, BLACK. ~ FALLING 30 INCHES WERE REQUIRED TO DRIVE A 2.5-INCH O.D. SAMPLER 12 INCHES. DRIVE SAMPLE. THE SYMBOL 10/12 INDICATES 10 BLOWS OF A 140-POUND HAMMER DRIVE SAMPLE. THE SYMBOL 6/6,9/6,6/6 INDICATES 6 BLOWS OF A 140-POUND HAMMER FALLING 30 INCHES WERE REQUIRED TO DRIVE A 2.0-INCH O.D. SAMPLER 6 INCHES, WATER LEVEL MEASURED AT TIME OF DRILLING. WATER LEVEL MEASURED SEVERAL DAYS AFTER DRILLING NOTES: 1. EXPLORATORY BORINGS TH-1 AND TH-2 FOR THIS INVESTIGATION WERE DRILLED ON APRIL 24 2014 WITH 4-INCH DIAMETER, CONTINUOUS-FLIGHT SOLID-STEM AUGER AND A TRACK-MOUNTED DRILL RIG. EXPLORATORY BORINGS TH-3 AND TH-4 WERE DRILLED ON JUNE 25 AND 26, 2014 WITH AN AIR ROTARY PERCUSSION SYSTEM AND AN ALL TERRAIN VEHICLE DRILL RIG. 2 LOCATIONS OF EXPLORATORY BORINGS WAS APPROXIMATE. 3. THESE EXPLORATORY BORINGS ARE SUBJECT TO THE EXPLANATIONS, LIMITATIONS AND CONCLUSIONS AS CONTAINED IN THIS REPORT. SUMMARY LEGEND OF EXPLORATORY BORINGS FORUM PHI ARCHITECTURE 511 LAZY CHAIR ROAD, LOT 2 PROJECT NO. GS05849Â·I20 FIG. 4 11. 11<1 -1//r S \GS)5849 000\120~8 DRAFTING#GSO5849 120 R.2 FIGURE 3 LOGS,GPJ .... SCALE: 1 '= 50' \.r Y $ t Â· U#0131'URf.ED SlTE AREA ~,r X / . , TE..42' EXCAVATE -73 802Z 2 -<__.~~~ 1 00('4 J~ --- ---4 &. Â£ -- ' F,4 4/I -~3#*1' r,1~~t~ I ./ , v E](TAVATE TO 6044Â· -- - *R,f EXCWMETO 120Â·-6 - - P.1- 44 M t ~/ L .Sti,1.k r--EXCAVATETOSO r 2 Ue,; E - t il TH-3 1 ~ 1-ExcavATE TO eczr 66. 4 44.4 7 , 1/J r EKZZIZ .z Â»wr A . TH-2 -2 0 47< - .l ,:ne- U}OSTAGEDSME AREA -- / StOUNPETO â€¢Ka, --~' C. \ - 4 - 7 - i / ' ur,5-1.-ED sini Adl -7 - t 'All'.&2Â¥24' ./ .1 1. I k AaE=34. - *-/-2 -71 9 -4 - PERC * 44, 1, . A-Â· lt- . .*49% HOLE f. 99Â· EZAVATE'ID 10 C -Â·-0-~: **baudil Â·5-=~156= pil/le 74 LOWER LEVEL E.EV = 5027 RELOCATED EVERGREEN RELOCATED DECIDUOUS Excavation Plan 1~ PROPOSED EVERGREEN (07-07-2014) and 9Â¥â‚¬ PROPOSED DECIOUOUS Boring FORUM PHI ARCHITECTURE Locations 511 LAZY CHAIR ROAD LOT 2 Project No. GS05849-120 Fig. 5 GS05849_FS 112 07 18 14 ERâ€¢ .. 7 Â· 6 ADDITIONAL COMPRESSION UNDER CONSTANT PRESSURE DUE TO 5 4 3 2 1 Â·-1 -2 - 00 -3 - -4 -5 -6 - -8 01 1.0 10 100 APPLIED PRESSURE - KSF Sample of CLAY, SANDY (CL) DRY UNIT WEIGHT= 111 PCF From TH-1 AT 10.5 FEET MOISTURE CONTENT= 14.3 % Swell Consolidation FORUM PHI ARCHITECTURE 511 LAZY CHAIR ROAD, LOT 2 Test Results PROJECT NO. GS05849-120 SAGS05849.000~120~6. CalcsTRepart 2\GS05849 120 Swell.xii FIG. 6 COMPRESSION % EXPANSION .. --- Mil-- HYDROMET ER ANALYSIS SIEVE ANALYSIS 1 25 HR 7 HR 11.ME READINGS U.S. STANDARD SERIES CLEAR SQUARE OPENINGS 45 MIN. 15 MIN 60 MIN 19 MIN 4 MIN 1 MIN 700 .100 *50 *40 -30 76 '10 -8 4 3,18' 344' 197 3- 5 6* 8' 100 -'-3 . I t, lili 1 - 1 1/ 1 1 90 I Â·-, -- 10 /1 , 80-.' 1 ~ t I ./ ' 2- ... O to 1 260 9. 40 '' Z 1 50 Â£ ~r. i f 40 -: 60 i I I 20 i K I 1 r Â£ 1 1 11 ~90 I I 001 0.002 .035 009 019 037 ,074 149 297 590 119 2 0 2 38 4.76 9 52 191 36.1 76.2 127 200 0.42 152 DIAMETER OF PARTICLE IN MILUMETERS CLAY (PLAITIC} TO SILT (NON-PLASTIC} SANDS GRAVEL FINE ~ MEDWM | COARS FINE ~ COARSE ~ COBBLES Sample of SAND, SILTY (SM) GRAVEL 37 % SAND 26 % Prom TH - 1 AT 14 FEET SILT & CLAY 37 % LIQUID LIMIT % PLASTICITY INDEX % HYDROMETER ANALYSIS SIEVE ANALYSIS 1 1 25 HR. 7 HR TIME READINGS U S STANDARD SERIES CLEAR SQUARE OPENINGS 45 MIN. 15 MIN. 60 MIN. 19 MIN. 4 MIN. 1 MIN. .200 *100 '50 '40 +30 '16 70 -8 '4 3/8- 3/4' 1M. 3- 5*60 8" 100 1 f- - -- -- --I 1 : 1 1 1 7 // . 30 1 1 0 .-3 40 ~ 1 1. i i 50 8 i 01 4 .1 60* 1 I i , 30 i i / r --70 20 -80 ' 10) 10 Q L -. L-. 1 -001 0.002 .005 .009 .019 .037 .074 .149 .297 .590 1 19 2.0 238 4.76 9.52 19 Y 36 1 76 2 12752200 0 42 5 MITER CE PARTICLE iN t.Â·ill L iMETERS SANDS GRAVEL Ct-AY <FLASTIC) TO SILT (NON PLAST*C) FiNE MEDIUM ~ COARS FINE ~ COARSE < COBBLES Sample of SAND, SILTY (SM) GRAVEL 33 % SAND 41 % From TH - 2 AT 9 FEET SILT & CLAY 26 % LIQUID LIMIT % PLASTICITY INDEX % FORUM PHI ARCHITECTURE Gradation 511 LAZY CHAIR ROAD, LOT 2 PROJECT NO. GS05849-120 Test Results SAGSO 5849.000% 120',6. Ca,cst.Report 2Â£GS05849 120 Gradation.xms ElG, 7 NI'tfl3H 1.*312132 0.3N?V:%32~ 1N /'ERC#NT P&SSINq 1 1 1 HYDROMETER ANALYSIS SIEVE ANALYSIS 25 HR 7 HR TIME READINGS U.S. STANDARD SERIES CLEAR SQUARE OPENINGS 45 MIN. 15 MIN 60 MINI 19 MIN 4 MIN. 1 MIN '200 '100 .50 .40 .30 *16 "10 *8 4 3/8* 3/4~ 1 1. 3- 5 6- r ; 0 Ill 90 ' ! 2c 30Â¤ i // .1 60 - Â·- 40 50 ' 50 EL.40 . -- 60 g i. 80 T 90 10 2 1 1 1 ./ .001 0 002 .005 .009 Â£19 .037 ,074 149 ,297 .590 1.19 2 0 2,38 4 76 9.52 19.1 36.1 76.2 127 200 0.42 152 DIAMETER OF PARTICLE IN MILUMETERS i SANDS GRAVE: i CLAY IPLASTIC) TO SIL.T <NONÂ·PLASTIC) ! FINE | MEDIUM | SOARS FINE | COARSE | COBBLES Sample Ot SAND, SILTY (SM) GRAVEL 13 % SAND 42 % From TH - 2 AT 14.5 FEET SILT & CLAY 45 % LIQUID LIMIT % PLASTICITY INDEX % HYDROMETER ANALYSIS | SIEVE ANALYSIS 25 HR. 7 HR TIME READINGS U 5, STANDARD SERIES CLEAR SQUARE OPENINGS 45 MIN. 15 MIN. 60 MIN. 19 MIN. 4 M.N 1 MtN. .20'0 '100 *50 *40 *30 76 '10 '8 '4 3/8- 354' 172- 3- 5"6* 8' -0 11 1 lili 1 1 1 , 1 1/ 50 -------- -- -- - - $ 7 1 j 10 1 -230 - 11 1 . //r 010 11.1 40 .-60 1 ###*- ' 70 20 1 - 80 , 1 + 1 -9Â£ I - i j { I 1, d U --- Â· | N __- /00 0 001 0 002 005 009 019 037 074 14g 297 590 119 2 0 2 38 4.'76 9.52 191 36.1 76.2 127 200 0.42 152 DIAME:rFR OF PARTIC.LF,N Mit 1.IMETERS, i SANDS GRAVEL CLAY:PLASTIC: 1091LT {NONÂ·PLASTIC) | FINE ~ MED!UM ~COARS FINE | COARSE ~ COBBLES Sample ot SAND, SILTY (SM) GRAVEL 26 % SAND 46 % From TH - 2 AT 24 FEET SILT & CLAY 28 % LIQUID LIMIT % PLASTICiTY INDEX % FORUM PHI ARCHITECTURE Gradation 511 LAZY CHAIR ROAD, LOT 2 PROJECT NO. GS05849-120 Test Results SAGS05849.000\12016. Caks\Report 2'Â·,GS05849 120 Gradation.30Â·s FIG. 8 ERCENT PASWN 3NtV.L38 7323 J -1.jI,Vi:,C J.INSJOIC ifyi .. - NOTE: SLOPE ................. DRAIN SHOULD BE AT LEAST 2 INCHES ~ELREEQ,EL ................. ~ BELOW BOTTOM OF FOOTING AT THE Ze>)*2001 6................ HIGHEST POINT AND SLOPE DOWNWARD ................. =0=06*. TO A POSITIVE GRAVTTY OUTLET OR TO A SUMP WHERE WATER CAN BE ................. ................. ................. REMOVED BY PUMPING. ................. ~ BACKFILL- 1 (COMPOSTION AND N ................. ~ COMPACnON PER REPORrl - ................. ................. ................. ........ ...... 7~4 - r- PROVIDE PLASHC SHEETING GLUED TO FOUNDATION WALL TO REDUCE PREFABRICATED - ...1..... MOISTURE PENETRATION ' DRAINAGE ' COMPOSNE - BELOW GRADE WALL SLOPE ll (MIRADRAIN 6000 Eâ‚¬gg::gA PER ~ ................. , OR EQUIVALENT) OSHA .................. , , REINFORCING STEEL Â¥immimma/ PER STRUCTURAL Eâ‚¬22ZR:51 / DRAWINGS , ~:mn:mm:mi / , , PROVIDE POSITIVE SUP JOINT .*A'M'.'.*A'.WN' / E*EE<.....Â·31 BEIWEEN SLAB AND WALL UV.W.tt...2.-.1 ~0,- FLOOR SLAB COVER GRAVEL WITH i ........ FILTER FABRIC WAW.' . ....... ..................el................. 1 011 .. '1.7- 4 Il-Â· 52247 4 6. lit'fÂ·,~:2.i:LaÂ· I;.*~ -. 3Jt-'-~ tif-'i -t= Ut:-7-j PVC DRAIN NETWORJ T 2Â» MINIMUM CONCRETE AGGREGATE ---~ 80 MINIMUM - IMBEDDED IN WASHED OR BEYOND 1:1 FOOnNG OR PAD SLOPE FROM BOTTOM OF FOOTING. (WHICHEVER IS GREATER) 4-INCH DIAMETER PERFORATED DRAIN PIPE. THE PIPE SHOULD BE LAID IN A TRENCH WITH A SLOPE RANGING BETWEEN 1 /8 INCH AND 1/4 INCH DROP PER FOOT OF DRAIN. ENCASE PIPE IN WASHED CONCRETE AGGREGATE (ASTM (33, NO. 57 OR NO. 67). EXTEND GRAVEL TO AT LEAST 1/2 HEIGHT OF FOOTING. Exterior Foundation FORUM PHI ARCHITECTURE Wall Drain 511 LAZY CHAIR ROAD, LOT 2 Project No. GS05849-120 FIg. 9 0,0--2-CO 3-13-14 .. Â¥ = NOTE: .................. DRAIN SHOULD BE AT LEAST 2 INCHES SLOPE .................E BELOW BOTTOM OF FOOTING AT THE ................. ........'........4 ................. HIGHEST POINT AND SLOPE DOWNWARD ................. - TO A POSITTVE GRAVITY OUTLET OR TO .................. A SUMP WHERE WATER CAN BE ................. 7 REMOVED BY PUMPING. -- BACKFILL -- ................. MIRADRAIN G200N STRUCTURALLY SUPPORTED OR EQUIVALENT - - ---4.1'....... N- FLOOR SYSTEAA ....... ................. .................. 1 ................. .................. ................. ............................................... SLOPE l PER ................. OSHA E REINFORCING STEEL /-PER STRUCTURAL DRAWINGS â€¢Â·:mu CRAWL SPACE COVER ENnRE WIDTH OF GRAVEL ......... WrrH NON-WOVEN GEOTEXTILE .................. FABRIC (MIRAFI 14ON OR EQUIVALENT). ROOFING FELT IS i--...... =MUD SLABÂ» OR ................. AN ACCEPTABLE ALTERNATIVE. : b................ VAPOR BARRIER -1................. ................. 6 lilli- : 3/ 1 ~hd' -mE=G- 20 MINIMUM\* - \... ATTACH PLASTIC SHEEDNG ~ 8' MINIMUM - TO FOUNDATION WALL / OR BEYOND 1:1 SLOPE FROM BOTTOM OF FOOTING. PVC DRAIN NEIWORK (WHICHEVER IS GREATER) IMBEDDED IN WASHED CONCRETE AGGREGATE Â£ 4-INCH DIAMETER PERFORATED DRAIN PIPE. THE PIPE SHOULD BE LAID IN A TRENCH WITH A SLOPE OF AT LEAST 1 /8 INCH DROP PER FOOT OF DRAIN. Exterior Foundation FORUM PHI ARCHITECTURE 511 LAZY CHAIR ROAD, LOT 2 Wall Drain Project No. GSO5849-120 FIG. 10 Ein .. iF - 12" MIN. - . 10 -------- ~ ................. .................. -Â·................. 2 BACKFILL WITH SILTY ................... OR CLAYEY ON-SfTE SOIL ................... 1.................. .......1.......... '.2:55:2:~2:52:5:2~. >:iÂ·.-:?4 Â¥:: ...a*i- PROVIDE GRAVEL LAYER BEHIND .Â· 4 1 -4 ...~muumm -............... 'rEVErw.Â¥V....... WALL WASHED CONCRETE AGGREGATE (ASTM C33, NO. 57 OR NO. 67). ~ BACKFIU 9 ..: Â·? 5 ,';giggigg 0-ON-SITE -- ..al - MATERIALS j C....1, 1 23-:". ................. .â‚¬.:.b':. t. .................. L RETAINING WALL ................. 27.:..31%4. t..25.-~..-*. REINFORCING STEEL , i. -'71:â€¢% 7 'D' "11+1 '':11Â« PER STRUCTURAL 2 43 9 -92 'kf'~*~~~~~-~.%*-~ DRAWINGS. .i'O.?..9.:ibaee:4 SLOPE PER .:..:G j,4:Â·..6.1/9::.:l%tfâ‚¬>6$:::%:it~ - ................... OSHA 4-INCH DIAMETER PERFORATED - RIGID DRAIN PIPE. THE PIPE + SHOULD BE PLACED IN A TRENCH .................. WITH A SLOPE RANGING BETWEEN ... Â· -Er E-Xe*20>2Â·Zi 1/16-INCH AND 1/8-INCH DROP - PER FOOT OF DRAIN. DISCHARGE ,mm~Av.Â·.Â·.Â·::m~~.Â·=Aw.Â·9974Â·=m4:m.=: 9 TO POSITME GRAVITY OUTLET OR SUMP WHERE WATER CAN BE -- -I --I - I I -- REMOVED BY PUMPING. lilli 1 lili, FOOHNG OR OTHER TYPE FOUNDATION Typical Earth Retaining FORUM PHI ARCH!TECTURE 511 LAZY CHAIR ROAD, LOT 2 Wall Drain Project No. GS05849-120 Fig. 11 :5--RETAINNG.*WA#.i_04 IEVISO':1 5-20 4 TABLE I i SUMMARY OF LABORATORY TESTNG PROJECT NO. GS05849-120 ATTERLERG LIMITS SWELL TEST RESULTS' . PASSING MOISTURE DRY LIQUID PLASTICI-1Y APPLIED SOLU8LE PERCENT PERCENT NO. 200 EXPLORATORY DEPTH CONTENT DENSITY LIMIT INDEX SWELL PRESSURE SULFATES GRAVEL SAND SIEVE : BORING (FEET) t C, ' (PCF) (%) (%) (PSF) (50) <56) (56) (%) DESCRIPTION (96) TH-1 4 17.8 25 7 44 SAND, SILTY TO CLAYEY (SC-SM) TH-1 11 14.3 111 -0.1 1,000 CLAY, SANDY (CL) TH-1 14 9.4 37 26 37 GRAVEL. SILTY TO CLAYEY (GC-GM) TH-1 29 15.3 118 41 SAND. SILTY (SM) TH-2 4 20.9 100 0.000 SAND, SILTY TO CLAYEY (SC-SM) 9 97 33 41 26 SAND. SILTY (SM) TH-2 15 7.8 137 13 42 45 SAND, SILTY (SM) TH-2 24 78.0 26 46 28 SAND. SILTY (SM) TH-2 34 12.2 18 3 21 SAND. SILTY (SM) * SWELL MEASURED WITH 1000 PSF APPLIED PRESSURE, OR ESTIMATED IN SITU OVERBURDEN PRESSURE. NEGATIVE VALUE INDEATES COMPRESSION Pagelofl 511 Lazy Chair, Lot 2 Maroon Creek Club Aspen, Colorado Name: Gravel, silty with cobbles and boulders Unit Weight: 132 pcf Existing Conditions Cohesion: 0 psf Phi: 30 Â° 2.3 Name: Bedrock . Unit Weight: 138 pcf 8.10 Cohesion: 500 psf Phi: 42 Â° 8.08 *-... 8.07 - 8.06 - ----0 8.05 - - 8.04 - 4 8.03 - --0.-- --------------- 8.02 - --0-0 8.01 - 8.00 - lilli lili 1 1 1 - _...1__._.1 1 --1 _ I _ 799 0 20 40 60 80 100 120 140 160 180 200 220 240 260 280 300 320 Distance Project No. GS05849-120 Fig. A-1 1~ 511 Lazy Chair. Lot 2 Maroon Creek Club Aspen, Colorado Name: Gravel, silty with cobbles and boulders Unit Weight: 132 pef Cohesion: 0 psf Phi: 30 Â° Distubance limit Name: Bedrock Unit Weight: 138 pcf 0.8 Cohesion: 250 psf Phi: 42 Â° 8.10 8.09 8.08 Vek-- 8.07 - ==r>>==-0- 8.06 r- 8.05 + -----i........9& 8.04 ; 4 8.03 - -- *-ji~-I .-12==00-V.------I-Â»Il.-l-â€ž 8.02- 8.01 4 8.001- 7.99 ~ | 1 1 2 1 1 1 1 1 1 lli 1il 0 20 40 60 80 100 120 140 160 180 200 220 240 260 280 300 320 340 Distance Project GS05849-145 Fig. A-2 Elevation (x 1000) 511 Lazy Chair, Lot 2 Maroon Creek Club Aspen, Colorado Name: Gravel, silly with cobbles and boulders Unit Weight: 132 pcf Cohesion: 0 psf Phi: 30 Â° Excavation with restraint force Name: Bedrock 19 Unit Weight: 138 pef â€¢ Cohesion: 250 psf Phi: 42 Â° 8.10 809 , 8.08 9-0.-- 8.07 - 806 - 8.05 - 8.04 - 4 8.03 - '~ Retention force 8.02 - 8.01 4- 6 lili I ..0.--- 800 - 7.99 ~ 1 1 lili 1 1 1 Iii _i i I i 1 0 20 40 60 80 100 120 140 160 180 200 220 240 260 280 300 320 340 Distance Project No. GS05849-120 Fig A-3 =r .. lilli EXHIBIT B SURFACE DRAINAGE, IRRIGATION AND MAINTENANCE Performance of foundations and concrete flatwork is influenced by the moisture conditions existing within the foundation soils. Surface drainage should be designed to provide rapid runoff of surface water away from the proposed residence. Proper surface drainage and irrigation practices can help control the amount of surface water that pene- trates to foundation levels and contributes to settlement or heave of soils and bedrock that support foundations and slabs-on-grade. Positive drainage away from the foundation and avoidance of irrigation near the foundation also help to avoid excessive wetting of backfill soils, which can lead to increased backfill settlement and possibly to higher lateral earth pressures, due to increased weight and reduced strength of the backfill. CTLIThompson, Inc. recommends the following precautions. The home owner should maintain surface drainage and, if an irrigation system is installed, it should substantially conform to these recommendations. 1. Wetting or drying of the open foundation excavations should be avoided. 2. Excessive wetting of foundation soils before, during and after construction can cause heave or softening of fill and foundation soils and result in foun- dation and slab movements. Proper surface drainage around the residence and between lots is critical to control wetting. 3. The ground surface surrounding the exterior of the residence should be sloped to drain away from the building in all directions. We recommend a minimum constructed slope of at least 12 inches in the first 10 feet (10 per- cent) in landscaped areas around the residence, where practical. We do not view the recommendation to provide a 10 percent slope away from the foundation as an absolute. It is desirable to create this slope where practical, because we know that backfill will likely settle to some degree. By starting with sufficient slope, positive drainage can be maintained for most settlement conditions. There are many situations around a residence where a 10 percent slope cannot be achieved practically, such as around patios, at inside foundation corners, and between a house and nearby sidewalk. In these areas, we believe it is desirable to establish as much slope as practi- cal and to avoid irrigation. We believe it is acceptable to use a slope on the order of 5 percent perpendicular to the foundation in these limited areas. For lots graded to direct drainage from the rear yard to the front, it is difficult to achieve 10 percent slope at the high point behind the house. We believe it is acceptable to use a slope of about 6 inches in the first 10 feet (5 per- cent) at this location. Construction of retaining walls and decks adjacent to the residence should not alter the recommended slopes and surface drainage around the resi- dence. Ground surface under the deck should be compacted and slope away from the residence. A 10-mil plastic sheeting and landscaping rock is recommended above the ground under the decks to reduce water dripping from the deck causing soil erosion and/or forming depressions under the FORUM PHI ARCHITECTURE 511 LAZY CHAIR ROAD, LOT 2 Exhibit A-1 PROJECT NO. GS05849-120 REVISED SAGS05849.000\12012. Reports\GS05849 120 Rl Revised.doc .. deck. The plastic sheeting should direct water away from the residence. Retaining walls should not flatten the surface drainage around the resi- dence and block or impede the surface runoff. 4. Swales used to convey water across yards and between houses should be sloped so that water moves quickly and does not pond for extended periods of time. We suggest minimum slopes of about 2 to 2.5 percent in grassed areas and about 2 percent where landscaping rock or other materials are present. If slopes less than about 2 percent are necessary, concrete-lined channels or plastic pipe should be used. 5. Backfill around the foundation walls should be moistened and compacted. 6. Roof downspouts and drains should discharge well beyond the limits of all backfill. Splash blocks and/or extensions should be provided at all down- spouts so water discharges onto the ground beyond the backfill. We gener- ally recommend against burial of downspout discharge. Where it is neces- sary to bury downspout discharge, solid, rigid pipe should be used and it should slope to an open gravity outlet. Downspout extensions, splash blocks and buried outlets must be maintained by the home owner. 7. The importance of proper home owner irrigation practices cannot be over- emphasized. Irrigation should be limited to the minimum amount sufficient to maintain vegetation: application of more water will increase likelihood of slab and foundation movements. Landscaping should be carefully designed and maintained to minimize irrigation. Plants placed close to foundation walls should be limited to those with low moisture requirements. Irrigated grass should not be located within 5 feet of the foundation. Sprinklers should not discharge within 5 feet of foundations. Plastic sheeting should not be placed beneath landscaped areas adjacent to foundation walls or grade beams. Geotextile fabric will inhibit weed growth yet still allow natural evaporation to occur. 8. The design and construction criteria for foundations and floor system alter- natives were compiled with the expectation that all other recommendations presented in this report related to surface and subsurface drainage, land- scaping irrigation, backfill compaction, etc. will be incorporated into the pro- ject. It is critical that all recommendations in this report are followed. FORUM PHI ARCHITECTURE 511 LAZY CHAIR ROAD, LOT 2 Exhibit A-2 PROJECT NO. GS05849-120 REVISED SAGS05849.000Vt2012. ReportsiGS05849 120 Rl Revised.doc . lili SZ~!2~5225 July 23, 2014 Forum Phi Architecture 715 West Main Street, Suite 204 Aspen, CO 81611 Attention: Dustin Anderson Subject: Steep and Potentially Unstable Slopes and Geologic Hazards Report for the Residence Planned at 511 Lazy Chair Road, Lot 2 Aspen, Pitkin County, Colorado Project No. GS05849-120 This letter provides our comments relative to a) Title 26, Land Use Regulation. Section 26.435.030.C.1 of the Aspen Land Use Regulations and b) the "Steep and Potentially Unstable Slopes" (Section 7-20-20) and "Geologic Hazards" (Section 7-20-50) sections of the Pitkin County Land Use Code relative to new construction at the subject location. Descriptions of the subsurface conditions at the property and the planned new construction are provided in our Soils and Foundation Investigation dated July 18, 2014. Geologic Hazards assessment is required in a) Title 26, Land Use Regulation. Section 26.435.030.C.1 of the Aspen Land Use Regulations and b) Section 7-20-50 of the Pitkin County Land Use Code. 511 Lazy Chair Road has an existing single-family home and driveway that will be demolished and removed from the site to allow for construction of a new residence. The subject parcel is situated on the moderate-sloping east side of a local hill between Tiehack Road and Maroon Creek, east of the Buttermilk Ski Area. Published geologic mapping; confirmed by our borings shows the site is underlain by lateral glacial moraine deposits that include sand, silt, cobbles and boulders (Reference 1). An excerpt from the geologic map is reproduced below as Figure 1. Bedrock from the Cretaceous age Upper Shale member of the Mancos Shale formation underlies the glacial drift. The Upper Shale member is typically thin bedded dark gray limey shale and sandstone. An ancient, inactive fault is inferred below the glacial drift on Reference 1. Our borings encountered 234 Center Drive I Glenwood Springs, Colorado 81601 Telephone: 970-945-2809 Fax: 970-945-7411 .. significantly deeper bedrock in the boring drilled east of the residence (TH-1) than in those drilled west (TH-3 and TH-4). We doubt this is due to the fault, and more likely due to the filling by the receding glacier of the previously eroded Maroon Creek drainage. On Bruce Bryant's 1972 Map Showing Areas of Selected Potential Geologic Hazards in the Aspen Quadrangle, Reference 3, the project site is not designated as having exposure to Flood Plains, Alluvial Fans, Landslides, Rockfall Areas, Wet Meadows or Potentially Unstable Slopes. This map is of a scale large enough that it is not sufficient to evaluate geologic hazards present on any specific site planned for development. 14 k - 4 " f 2 o 1 8 / . Â£ Ropi'to 0 (luu) n Af tÂ· ; i 1 // 4 f f {1 >3,1 . 1, 1 1 t ~ ~ / K. 4 31 . 1. Â· 4 6 4 ~ Fp:.R rri i 1///f..Q g:/ 11 2 f \41 : 20" tt CS , I 9% , 1 1 1 . : i ~ I | 4.#9 14 f., 1 1, -AN 1 i 1.1 | r~* # 1. 1. 4 9 1 'R I> 3 % t. I \,i 1 k . . \ :14 . il 0\1144 , 1 1 1 .1 1 1 Â·./. 1, 1 7,4 4 f 1 I . 1 .i 14 .1 f j '1 t,f h .1 , j I.ri 1 3. 1 + / 1 4- WAh 7 Figure 1 - Snapshot from the Reference 1 Geologic Map showing the existing residence as a dot located just left (west) of"k" the word "Creek." Our personnel were present during drilling borings for the new development. I traversed the slopes above and below the existing residence, FORUM PWI ARCHITECTURE â€¢ 511 LAZY CHAIR ROAD, LOT 2 ' PROJECT NO. GS05849-120 SAGS05849.000\120\3. Letters\GS05849-120 U Geologic Hazards.doc .. gr made observations of the parcel and took photographs during my site visit on July 20, 2014. My (David Glater) experience in the area and review of pertinent literature and aerial photographs has allowed me to form opinions as to the existence of geologic hazards on the parcel. Section 7-2-50 of the Land Use Code lists several common alpine geologic hazards to be evaluated including Avalanche, Landslide, Rockfall, Alluvial Fans, Talus Slope, Mancos Shale, Faults, Expansive Soil and Rock and Ground Subsidence. Each of these is specifically discussed in the following bulleted points. â€¢ Avalanche: Due to the limited slope length above the residence of about 200 feet and inclination of about 25 percent, I believe there is nil potential for avalanche. â€¢ Rockfall: The parcel is not subject to rockfall from above, as there are no rock outcrops present above the site and no cobbles or boulders were observed on the ground surface above the site. â€¢ Alluvial Fans: No defined drainages or alluvial fans were noted on the site. â€¢ Talus Slope: The subject parcel is not subject to exposure to talus slopes. â€¢ Mancos Shale: The subject parcel is underlain by Mancos Shale. Mapping shows the bedding inclination is about 20 degrees to the north-northwest. This implies that the shale beds dip into the excavation on the west and south sides, which is an adverse inclination for stability. It is possible the Mancos Shale has an expansion potential upon wetting. Our July 18, 2014 Soil and Foundation Investigation discusses recommended mitigation due to Mancos Shale. â€¢ Faults: An ancient, inactive normal fault is present and may be directly under the subject site. This fault was probably last active during the Laramide Orogeny about 30 million years ago, the last mountain-building episode to affect the Aspen area. The presence of this fault does not increase seismic risk beyond what is expected in the region. The Aspen area is generally considered to have risk of only small ground motions with seismic events likely to occur within the expected life of this development. â€¢ Expansive Soil and Rock: Laboratory testing conducted for our July 18, 2014 Soil and Foundation Investigation implies there is a very low expansion potential for the Mancos Shale. No precautions due to expansive soil and bedrock are necessary for this site. FORUM PHI ARCHITECTURE 3 511 LAZY CHAIR ROAD, LOT 2 PROJECT NO. GS05849-120 SAGS05849.000\120\3. LettersiGS05849-120 U Geologic Hazards.doc .. T â€¢ Ground Subsidence: The site may be underlain at depths exceeding 5000 feet by salt beds in the geologically older Eagle Valley Formation and Eagle Valley Evaporite. We are not aware of ground subsidence related to dissolution of the salts that has affected property in the area of this site. We are not aware of undermining under the site due to past metal mining (Reference 4). We believe the potential for ground subsidence to be nil at this site. â€¢ Potentially Unstable Slopes: Upslope and downslope areas on the parcel are moderate. Brief observations of the slopes did not reveal evidence of instability. If the temporary excavation slopes are properly engineeredl we believe it is unlikely slope instability will affect the site during and after construction. In summary, we believe there are no geologic hazards present at 511 Lazy Chair Road, Lot 2 that preclude the planned development. The parcel on which the proposed development will occur is suitable for development considering its slope, ground stability characteristics, including mine subsidence and the possibility of mudflow, rock falls and avalanche dangers. The parcel was not found to contain hazardous or toxic soils. Section 7-20-20 of the code delineates existing ground slopes on a land parcel into three categories based on percent ground slope. The three categories are slopes between 15 and 29 percent, slopes between 30 and 44 percent and slopes greater than 45 degrees. This site falls within the first, least stringent category. Development within the different categories is permissible based on meeting various requirements. From a geologic and geotechnical engineering perspective the requirement is that the inherent risk of potential slope instability can be mitigated to provide a safe and stable development subsequent to the completion of construction on a property. Our Soil and Foundation Investigation contains specific recommendations for design and construction of temporary and permanent earth retainage. We recommend that CTL be engaged to provide the design of the required earth retention system. Maximum excavations to construct the basement level will involve excavations of up to 45 feet. Some areas adjacent to the downhill side of the building will require earth retention. To allow for safe and stable excavations at the site a significant earth retention system will need to be designed. The earth retention system may include a combination of cantilevered solider beams, post- tensioned anchors, soil nails and micropiles. The need for temporary or permanent dewatering systems will also need to be evaluated. The installation of earth retention and dewatering systems in the vicinity of the subject parcel is common and a normal construction practice. Earth retention and permanent dewatering systems can be installed that will maintain or improved the global stability on the parcel. FORUM PHI ARCHITECTURE 4 511 LAZY CHAIR ROAD, LOT 2 PROJECT NO. GS05849Â·120 SAGS05849.000\120\3. LettorslGS05849-120 1.2 Geologic Hazards.doc .. Item 5, a, b, c, d and e provide guidelines for retaining wall construction. Earth retention and retaining wall designs by CTL I Thompson, Inc. will satisfy the specified criteria. We appreciate the opportunity to work with you on this project. If you have questions or we can be of further service, please call. Very truly yours, CTL I T'-1~SON, INC. i '11~/ iU 1 ltv 1 â€¢j /Jo~64/lechling, P.E. ~*Iranch Manager 1141440 David A. Glater, P.E., C.P.G. Principal Geological Engineer JM:DAG:cd CC: Via email to danderson@forumphi.com FORUM PHI ARCHITECTURE 5 511 LAZY CHAIR ROAD, LOT 2 PROJECT NO. GS05849-120 SAGS05849.000\120\3. Letters\G805849Â·120 U Geologic H=ards.doc .. References for Geologic Hazards section: 1. Map Showing Types of Bedrock and Surficial Deposits in the Aspen Quadrangle, by Bruce Bryant, USGS Map 1-785-H, 1972 2. Geologic Map of the Aspen Quadrangle, by Bruce Bryant, ISGS Map GQ 933, 1971 3. Map Showing Areas of Selected Potential Geologic Hazards in the Aspen Quadrangle, by Bruce Bryant, 1972 4. Map of Workings of the Aspen Mining District, by D. P. Rohlfing, 1943 FORUM PHI ARCHITECTURE 6 511 LAZY CHAIR ROAD, LOT 2 PROJECT NO. GS05849Â·120 SAGS05849.000\120\3. Letters\GS05849-120 U Geologic Hazards.doc .... /1 RECEIVED FORUM PHI JUL 2 5 2014 CITY OF ASPEN 715 West Main Street, Suite 204 Aspen Colorado 81611 COMMLINITY DEVELOPMEN1 P 970 279 4157 F 866 770 5585 511 LAZY CHAIR 511 LAZY CHAIR LOT 2 LLC 511 Lazy Chair Aspen, CO 81611 OP CO, Um:i~i;â€¢C â€¢40-- r: Ir-'.lk------I - a STEVEN WILSON 18Â£2 #M-Uk,WrZUNQ#glif.,irÂ«f YATTIC*"Pad.-41'F) -2~7\-Â»uf,SEN,1,7Â»/'Â¥I - ./8%529'"ilr'~AR- -, 4 - ALI ii,*d*Irl~**#1458..4 402127 '-*Â·2212,=----4-12&--1.5.1- - . 1 91 . - - le.... -1 - - -- -- - :11- - -- - . Dz .-: 3- 2.-037E~-9r==rÂ»tÂ»â‚¬:pGâ‚¬jÂ¤5*~I:W~ - CONSULTANTS . . - .- 2- ---7=---4->-Â·Â»'*41' t..11/ ' 1 1113 lt-Ch/- SURVEYOR 4 4, .Fgelt"Wed#*/IV~A - Tuttle Surveying Services d, + + + . + 9 4 -*7-- 727 Blake Ave + + U + + + + + + + . 44,) /4- 1 I . Or-- - - = Glenwood Springs CO 81901 1-i.Â«11/1-i (970)928-9708 -- 1 jeff@tss-us com CIVIL 6 + + f.â‚¬-+ -- *UNk PO Box 9554 Â·Â·vt,~,At-uâ‚¬D~f07Â¥Ece*XyW*21353.-*LUXU /< PLtuic"ge,Â·l 31'.91* la- <r./ . --t - . - - ----~~--=rT-Ur,f-,~,â€¢-er...."./.â„¢11'..I-W.I.-'ll/"g/3..../Ba -...a 1Â»29-â‚¬4--- 4= - .* 4 4. n_Z-ix<Â»44Â» gai~biz I . I **&*<*< - ~0444Â« CTL Thompson e- 4- . â‚¬ e . . *lk *21 - %*-k- 6 + + + .. . . e #%44. -I. ./ .. .. ./ .-L .C Y GEOTECH 6 + 6 + + + 4- + â‚¬*47%-4-47 en + fr- 6 t= 6 + 6+44-47â‚¬- e 9 + . 6 + + 6 + 6 4- 4 47 â‚¬ 9 + 9 + kx-k- 4/ 6 + + + I Roaring Fork Engineering 4-+ + + 4- E- & . + . e e + â‚¬- 66$6.- . ..... 6 + 66666 6 + 6 + 6 + 4- + + 4 + + 9 + eflrirklite-& 6 + 4 + 4 + 6 + 4 4-44:4-+46 4242+k k. k k *kk k__beÂ»<~â‚¬J~L --Â«7-=7 44 .....< ...4 .. # STRUCTURAL 66666666 6 + 4 9 4 9 + TBD 6+++ 66+44 6 + + 4 4 +464 fee#kk-K i 6- 6 6 6 6 6 +6 6 4 6 6 6 4= 4 6 + 6 6 --b----Â»--9 4464.-466 Â»-Â»<-13-~ CONTRACTOR Kevin Mc:Clure PO Box 6957 Snowmass Village. CO 81615 (970) 379 9088 SHEET INDEX KvnMcClure@gmail com 7/11/014 DATE OF PUBLICATION 21-001 COVER 21-004 RDS COMPLIANCE Zl-002 INDEX OF PRIOR APPROVALS Zl-005 DEMO SITE PLAN 21-003 NETLOTAREA 1st AMENDMENT SURVEY SITE IMPROVEMENT SURVEY ~ SITE IMPROVEMENT SURVEY ~ CIVIL - COVER 1.'-- 1/6 CIVIL - OFFSITE Zl-011 SITE PLAN Z 7/11/14 8040 GREENLINE 2/6 CIVIL- DRAINAGE BASINS Zl-012 EXTERIOR LIGHTING Z 3/28/14 PLATAMENDMENT 3/6 CIVIL - GRADING AND DRAINAGE 21-013 EXTERIOR LIGHTING CUTSHEET 4/6 CIVIL - UTILITIES Zl-014 PLAN PROJECT NO 1405 5/6 CIVIL - FIRE TRUCK SIM Zl-015 ELEVATIONS IN31Â¥d073430 AlINA}WÂ¥00 DRAWN BY, SMW 6/6 CIVIL - EROSION CONTROL Zl-016 ELEVATIONS Zl-017 ELEVATIONS SCOPE OF WORK CERTIFICATION RDS REVIEW COPYRIGHT FORUM PHI. LLC N389Â¥40 Allo The razing of an existing single family residence for construction of a 1 (Designer/Architect) certify that the information shown here in the 'Z Residential Design Standards compliance must be reviewed and new single family residence Sheets' is correctly and accurately drawn to reflect what is to be approved prior to submission for building permit. constructed in regards to floor area, setbacks. and heights 'llid p . U if The minor amendment for subdivision was approved by Aspen City Reviewed and Approved for Permit Submiss,onÂ· 511 Lazy Chair Council ordinance 12 series 2014 and amendments to the annexation agreement for the Arthur 0 Prister Subdivision Lots 2&3 Designer/Architect 7 4, ..4 ..... 511 Lazy Chair Lot 2, Aspen, CO 81611 Community Development Depar'tment 03Airidd 8040 GREENLINE REVIEW The project meets conditions of the Historic Preservation Commission, Land Use Application for 8040 Greenline Review, exclusion of disturbance above 8060' elevation, except for utilities, Date SHEET TITLE drainage, and wildfire mitigation. BUILDING PERMIT NUMBER CODE EDITIONS 2009 IRC 2009 IMC. 2009 IECC, 2009 IPC, 2009 IFGC. 2011 NEC. CITY OF ASPEN MUNICIPALCODE TITLE 8 Zl-001 FIRE SPRINKLER SYSTEM NFPA 130 (EXISTING TO BE REVISED PER PLANS) SCOPE OF WORK INCLUDES COVER f '90 * 109 493 11\ 1\ 1 -11 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 A 4 1 7 tulll"A , 1 4 Z ~li7\17\)A yy y N y y yyy Y y y y 11 -&21.. .1 *1*,/ ; f: F -y j -1- < -A A ~ P -A A A 3 A 1 '- 111 3~AjA AMANF 3 0 3%Â¢ 6 4 f r _ .i . , ill di,Yi Ny 4 0 4 # 1, y 1 y y y y y ,Â¥ 9 3 9 1 ,<763313~1 1\ Indelor Approvals - 2014 Indexof Pnor Approvals - 2014 Index of Pri~vals - 2014 V = 1-0 FORUM PHI INDEX OF PRIOR APPROVALS Lease Agreement dated August 16.1982 Rec:eption Number 363275 Plat Book 33, Page 4 Recorded November 15.1993 Reception Number 243707, Book 431. Page 627, Recorded August 25.1982 (1 Page) SUBDIVISION Lot 2, Author O Prster Fully Developed Lands Subdivis,on Exempton Water Service Agreement, dated July 26, 1993 Lease Agreement, dated August 16.1982 Reception Number 363258. Book 730 Page 797 Recorded November 15.1993 General Land Office Patent - August 26, 1911 Reception Number 243708, Book 431. Page 628, Recorded August 25.1982 (3 Pgs) Reception Number 074888 Book 55 Page 191 (1 Page) First Amendment to Water Service Agreement, dated July 26.1993 Â· Water rights to ditches and reservoirs Agreement. dated August 8 1982 Reception Number 409559 Book )00(. Page >>>, Recorded January 17, 1996 Â· Mineral extraction right and Amended Agreement dated January 15,1984 Access Easement Agreement dated November 19.1993 715 West Main Street. Suite 204 Reception Number 243706. Book 431, Page 617 Recorded August 25,1982 (10 Pgs) Warranty Died dated November 7. 1950 Reception Number 257066. Book 460, Page 373, Recorded February 3. 1984 (11 Pgs) Reception Number 364074. Book 733 Page 590, Recorded December 2, 1993 Aspen Colorado 81611 Reception Number 097937 Book 176 Page 79 recorded November 7,1958 (1 Page) P 9702794157 F 866 7705585 Tiehack Water Tank Site Platting Exemption Plat, dated September 10, 1982 Golf Course Easement Agreement dated December 8.1993 Correction Died dated November 7, 1958 Recept,on Number 244234, Plat Book 13 Page 88 Recorded September 17,1982 (1 Page) Reception Number 364890. Book 735 Page 400. Recorded December 15 1993 Reception Number 107215 Book 185 Page 486 (and In Book 242 Page 369A) (2 Pgs) Tlehack Water Tank Platting Exemption Plat dated June 6.1983 Resolution Number 94-239 of BOCC dated December 20.1994 Recorded Plat May 18.1951 Reception Number 250827. Plat Book 15 Page 5, Recorded June 10. 1983 ( 1 Page) Reception Number 379407, Book 775, Page 282. Recorded March 2,1995 Reception Number 098360 Plat Book 2A Page 146 (1 Page) 511 LAZY CHAIR Agreement. dated January 5,1984 Author O Plater Fully Developed Lands Subdwlsion Exemption Plat â€¢ Notel. easements, and recitals Recepbon Number 403369 Plat Book 45, Page 42 Reception Number 256282, Book 458 Page 752. Recorded January 6, 1984 (6 Pgs) 511 LAZY CHAIR LOT 2 LLC Agreement dated May 10, 1951 511 Lazy Chair Tax Free Exchange Agreement, dated December 6.1983 Consent and Ratfication of Plat, dated May 30.2008 Reception Number 098386 Book 175 Page 513 (2 pgs) recorded June 1 1951 (2 Pgs) Aspen, CO 81611 Reception Number 257065 Book 460 Page 366, Recorded February 3, 1984 (7 Pgs) Reception Number 550278, Recorded June 16.2008 Quit Claim Deed dated December 19, 1969 Quit Claim Deed. dated December 6 1983 Ordinance 34 Series 1996- Maroon Creek Club Subdislon (South ) Property Annexat,on. dated Reception Number 138379.Book 245, Page 114 recorded December 16 1969 (2 Pgs) Reception Number 257067, Book 460 Page 384. Recorded February 3 1984 (4 Pgs) August 263.1996 Agreement dated December 19. 1969 Reception Number 41985, recorded February 21. 1997 Quit Claim Deed. dated January 19, 1984 Reception Number 138380 Book 245. Page 116, recorded on December 16,1969 (3 Pgs) Reception Number 257132 Book 460 Page 573 Recorded February 6, 1984 (2 Pgs) An Ordinance of #e Aspen City Council Granting a Rezoning for the Maroon Creek Subdwlsion and re-recorded on August 25 1972 as Recephon Number 153537 Book 266, Page 253 (2 Pgs) + 1--3 OP in Con,unct,on with Annexatin Into the City of Aspen, dated October 28 1996 Lease Agreemer,t dated May 1 1967 Quit Claim Died dated March 31, 1984 Recepbon Number 403224, Recorded April 8.1997 4/C--1 Reception Number 258682, Book 460, Page 384. Recorded April 11, 1984 (5 Pgs) Reception Number 139294. Book 246, Page 711, recorded February 10.1970 (18 Pgs) , C STEVEN 3 1 and Clarification Deed, dated September 12.1988 Maroon Creek Club Subdivision (South) Annexat,on Plat '* < WILSON ~ Reception Number 308906, Book 586. Page 147 (3 Pgs) Reception 401571. Plat Book 41, Page 76 Recorded February 6. 1997 Amended Lease Agreement dated November 27 1969 402127 jii) Recept,on Number 139295. Book 246. Page 728, Recorded February 10.1970 (12 Pgs) \0\ Â· This annexation includes two Out Parcels containing 2 197 acres and 5 840 acres of the Resolution No 91-111 of BOCC 1041 EnwronmerÂ¢al Hazard Revi- Dated June 11. 1991 Maroon Creek Club Subdiws,on and PUD plot Deed of Easement dated November 27.1969 Reception Number 336728. Book 657 Page 306 Recorded September 23,1991 (21 Pgs) \%..5</ Reception Number 1 39296. Book 246. Page 740, Recorded February 10.1970 (6 Pgs) Improvement Survey Plat. dated July 18.2012 'SED_ff- Amendment to Resolution No 91-112 of the BOCC, dated August 7, 1991 Encroachment of Golf Tee and Septic Lids Reception Number 336729 Book 657. Page 384, Recorded September 23 1991 Dead of Easement dated November 27. 1969 Reception Number 139297. Book 246, Page 746. Recorded February 10.1970 (6 Pgs) Easement Deed. dated ,2014 Ded,cabon Agreement for Roads dated August 13,1993 Reception Number , Book __, Page __ Recorded 2014 Reception Number 363240, Book 730 Page 662. Recorded November 12 1993 Deed of Easement dated November 27.1969 CONSULTANTS Recept,on Number 139298. Book 246. Page 752, Recorded February 10.1970 (2 Pgs) Ordinance 12. Senes 2014 -An ord,nance of the city of Aspen City Council approving a Minor Access Easement Agreement dated September 8, 1993 Subd,vislon Amendment and an Amendment to the Annexation Agreement for the Arthur O Reception Number 363255, Book 730. Page 774. Recorded November 12 1993 Pfister Subdvislon Lots 2 and 3. Cty of Aspen, Poin County Colorado Reception SURVEYOR Deed of Easement dated February 2.1970 Nurnber6_11208. Book Page Reception Number 139727. Book 247. Page 424, Recorded March 18,1970 (4 Pgs) - - - __ Recorded 2014 Tuttle Surveying Services Special Warranty Deed, dated November 12 1993 Â· Parcel ID Lot 2 2735-113-02-002 727 Blake Ave Reception Number 363250 Book 730. Page 793 Recorded November 12 1993 Glenwood Springs CO 81901 Grant of Easementdated October 27, 1977 Â· Parcel ID Lot 2 2735113-02-003 Recept,on Number 199364, Book 338, Page 694, Recorded November 15.1977 0 Pgs) (970)928-9708 Special Warranty Deed dated November 12,1993 1" Amendment Final Plat Jeff@tss-us com Reception Number 363257, Book 730. Page 793. Recorded November 12 1993 Second Amendment to Lease, dated November 14,1977 Reception Number 199510. Book 338, Page 994 Recorded November 19 1977(4 Pgs) CIVIL Lot Line Adjustment Plat dated August 13.1993 Quit Claim Deed, dated August 8.1982 Roaring FoR Engineering Reception Number 363254. Plat Book 33, Page 3 Recorded November 12,1993 Reception Number 243705, Book 431. Page 614 Recorded August 25. 1982 (3 Pgs) PO Box 9554 Final Subdi nsion Plat & PUD for Mafoon Creek Club Aspen CO 81611 (970) 448-7474 R,chardG@rfeng biz GEOTECH CTL Thompson RECEPTION#: 611208,06~18/2014 at STRUCTURAL 01.13:06 PM TBD 1 of 4. R $26.00 Doc Code ORDINANCE Anice K vos Caudill, P,tkin County. CO U H E.REAM, ihe Â·1:pen (Â·it> Council lind, lh:,1 [hi. urdinance turlhen and is neeessan te, date of publication 01 the notice of final development approval as requi-ed under Section ORDINAM'F No. 1 2 PAR[16(8 2{114) 1 he pr mution 01'pub|â€žÂ· |kÂ·.111 h. safet>. and â€žc! I:iTc The subdivision plat â€¢hull comain a note prohibiting de, elopment belou lie gi.lf Lart path on 1 0, 26.304.070(A). The rights of referendum shall bc limited as set forth in the Colorado Â·\A ORDINA #iÂ·Foli lili ( llk OF Abl'I N( ll'i ( 01 AC IL Al' I'RUP, IN (, A All# 01< NOU. Tll F.REFâ‚¬)RE. HH I [ ORI) INED H) TH F â‚¬ I n C olliC 11 OF -] HE ( 11 3 3. except as reah,inable neveâ€žar> for ulility infrie.truclure. storm uater millgation. mainlenance : Constitution and the Aspen Ilome Rule Chancr. 01 HI)Ii']%]00 AMF.V)tlF.XT AND AN â„¢F.NI)MENI "10 lilk AN#F\Al]ON (* AM 'EN. C O[.OM.,IX). 2, folio .: or resturation â€žf nati, c land-ape. and v.,Idfire miligal,im needs. 1 Section 6 CONTRACTOR ,( . REE M EN I FOR I HE. 4 RTH C R O. 141> I F.It >,1 111) 1 ~ 141( )1 1.0'1 4 2 1~ND 3, CI M All amendmen' 10 'he Anhur O Pliur Subdiâ€žbion 1- remption. 1 41.2 and 3. and an amendment 4,Â·ction 3: Zoning *lap Correction â€¢ fhis Ord,nance shall not affect an> existing litigation and shall not operate = an abatement ot Kevin McClure OF 1% PEV. Pil'KI; C ()1 All.,( C) I.()RAI>O. io the development pri,; mm i 1 the â€žater sen ice agreement hir the I â€žt. are hereb> arprmed i the< uinniumi> 1)Â·weltipmen[ Directorshall cause thet )licial ZonellitrIL[ rn.,pic. reflect 1.013 an> action or proceeding now pending under or by virtue of the ordinanees repealed or amended PO Box 6957 with The follow'ing :'indilkin' of approvalÂ· 1, 2, and 3 01 the Pl-iNter iubanisitin ag located in the Rural Rexidenlial (RR} /â€žne Distriel s herein provided. and the same shall be conducted and concluded under such prior ordinances. Snowmass Village. CO 81615 Parcel ID Lit: 2735-1 13-02-002 wilhout n Planned l)e,ek,pmen,(herlay. Themarinet,Trectl, indicateh thi.uierla}. (970) 379 9088 PuriÂ·,1 1 D Lul .1: 2735-1 1 3-02-003 Section l: Ap/licabilin of ('in De,clopmeri Requirementi Section 7. KvnMcCIure@gmail,com I he alk,wances and limitations for the dejek,pmenl 01 1.ois 2 and 3 approied h Pitkin Count) Section 4: It,pre,enlation. Pre!.cr,ed ] 1- an) section. subsection. sentence. clause. phrase. or portion of this Ordinance is for any reason U/100 1%, theCommunit> De~elopmen[ I *parm:111 receivej an applicanon for the und contained nithin CID of Aspen Ordinance $0 40. heric> 1 996. the prousions ot the 'A ata All material reprehentations and commlinwnti m.LIC b> the Applicant puniuant to the held invalid or unronstitutional in a court of wmpetent jurisdiction. such portion shall bc proper D known â€ž 1-,15 2 and 1. Anhur O. I'li,ter Subdi~ ivion I xem/tion. located ul 511 I.on ~er, ice agreement related to develi,pmen, allownen and limitations. the vubdiusi,in plal de'll,pinen, pr/Bill appro'/!s :s herein awarded. â€ž hether in publk heanng or documentation deemed a separate. dis,inct and independent provision and shall not aff" :he validily of the U11~2014 DATE OF PUBLICATION Chair Lane: Aspen. Colorado. frum ouner, 1.a/> Chair !.01 2.1.1-C: and. I aw> Chair I 011. I.I.C. approwd by Pitkin Count> and rel'orded at Ikvk 42 Page 45: and. pre,ic.us l.md u+e approial, presente,1 heltine the Community Ikick,pment 1):partment er the Aspen Cil> Counli| are herch) remailing portions thereof ~rresenled b> Steâ€ž \Vilsâ€žn ot-iÂ·.iruni l'hi Arch,[ecl>. und. ,ranted b> 1>]tkin C oune including an findmg. Interpretalions. and amendmellu. 4Â·,all be Section S inc~iq,twid in such plan de,elopment appriwIN and ihe M. shall be complied with u *f full> P# 11Elt}.Ax, the applieation 5eek, w amend lh, Nuleâ€ž i,ion appro,al gr:Intra b} Pilkin .unsidered wided upon rectirjatitin 01 ih: Subdi, ision Amendment ])1/ se, forth herel n. unle,s amended h> 01 her specificÂ· condilions Colint, prior â€ž, annexation ot the proper> into the (Â·it) 41 Asp,m md amend the anneution 1-hat the Cit> Clerk is directed, upon the adoption of this Or*ance. to reerd a copy of thit 1 01,2 and .1 shall remain hubdi,ided lots within the (Â·il> 01 Aspen. each # ith one de,clopmeni agreement with the City of Abplm. both ut' i hich ver turth cer.lin de,elepmen! allown,Â·B and 4ction f: 1 e/rd Itighb Ordinance in the office of the Pitkin Count> Clerk and Recorder. res'r,clion., and. right.and shall allmi development in accordance with the it> of Aspen de,elopment the Jâ€žÂ·lupment apprev:lib granted herein Nhall con,litul,Â· a ,ik-specific de, elopment plan i ested ~ allowanies and limitations including. but not limiled w. the City of Aspen 1.and / sc Code. the Ill)RE.A,0, the properlic wer. annexed into the ('i[> m A.>en h> the ad.ip,ion 01 lu: a pfri,id â€ž1 threc 11) year, tri),n ihe date of )Sbialle: â€ž! 11 Je, clopment order. 110, e,er, an, Sectio. 9: 4 Roral Residenlial (Rt) zon, districi:â€ž ma> be amel,Jed from time to time or as the properl> 1-ailure to abide b> an> 01 rhe terms and conditions #iendam W this apprnial shall re,ull in ihr A public hearing on the Ordinarke wa held on the 21 da> of ~a>. 2014. & 5:00 in the City Minance 34, Meriâ€ž 1996. ahieh ordinance accerled certain developinent .11|Ouallm and may be utherwi,e reioned [0 anâ€ž[her di/rict. the Urban Runoff Management i'lun, and ret,tricâ€žâ€ž11% placed â€žn th: proper,> h> Pitkin C.,unt>: and forfei,ure â€žt' said wsted propert> rights. Untels â€žthimk mempted or extended. lailure to Council Chamben. City hall, 130 South Galena Street. Aspen Colorado, fifteen ( 15) days prior to applicable huilling and fire code, properl> submit 111 plats and age/ments required ki be nxâ€žrded. as .pccified herein. within one - which hearing a public notice d the same las published in a newspaper of general circulation WIIEREAS. ihe priperies icÂ·re Jls,i subject of a Wate, Senice Agreement 3 1[h the icar ot [he effectiw date of the Je#elopmen, tirder Nhall alse rebil|t in the t.irlbiture of wid within ihe City of Aspen. Cit> 01' .1,pen wn ahibn to Ordinance 40. Series 1906) *hich agreement specified certain 1 he prmi,wns 01' the â€¢ater â€žnle: al:rement and thi C Ity's Mandaids and requiremenl. Z 7/11/14 8040 GREENLINE Isted prtiper[> righl, and shall render the de,elorment order roid within the meaning iiI Section ' de,elopmen, :,IMâ€ž#ances and reitrictioIL#: and. peraining to the Jellier> of polable â€ž/er whe propertie, whall be unaffecied b> thâ€ž Ordinance 26.104.050 (Void permits). Zoning thai 14 nut parl of ihe appros,1 hite-specific developmen: 9 Section 20: Z 3/28/14 PLATAMENDMENT plan *hi, 11 mil refull in the creation (,1 a j e#IÂ·d propert> nght 1-his ordinance shall become ellictive thir> (30) da> s fullwing final adoption. MIIEI{EGAA, pursuant w Section 26.480.090. Cit> Counwil may approve minor I / 2 #hull be iubjeci to an 80410 (ircenline Re,im. purâ€¢uant to Charler 26.433 .,1 ihe City b amendmenis to an m"ing subd"ision apprinal. ali I.and 1 Ne Cude as said C hapler ma> he amended from time tu time 1.01 3 i. not Hithin the 8040 No laterthar fi~urteen (14 )days I,41,1,#Ing finalappro,al{,j'all requi~,te re~ie~ geeesgin ,~1<,1,win Ii'HEREAS. pur,uant li. Section 20.304. IhÂ¢ Cit, ('Dun,il ma> amend th, pro# isions of a Greenline are a und 6 not subjecl k, thi, Te, ieu a dc~chipment order as liet 1Â·or,h in thm Ordinance. the Cit> Clcrk shall cause w be pubti.hed in J INTRODUCED, READ AND ORDERED Pl BLISHED us prjuded b> law. b> the City PROJECT NO 1405 previoush :,Jâ€žpled i,rdinance. specilicall) ordinance N., 40. Verio 1996: and. nes,spaper of gener,il circulation 0,[hin the Junsdictional hounjaneE of the CinÂ· of ispen. a ninice Council 01 the ( I> 01 Aspen on the 12' da> 01 May , 2014. DRAWN BY: SMW rhe developer 01 bolh ]UN *hall U â€žrk with the Cit> 01 A'ren I'.irk. 1)/partlnen' to minimile WHERF..1%, the Communit> De, clopmen[ Department recei,ed relenal cumment, from advihing t!,e general public of the approâ€žat of â€ž stte *peci fi, develormenl plan and creallen ul a Cit> iÂ·nlineering. 1,ullding I):pannicill. 1Â·iye I'role:li~in DislridÂ·1.1,1,rk, I)eparline,11. and C'il> digurbance to natne vegetalion and prehene groupings ol the natne Gambrel Oak iested propen> nghl pursuant to this~title. Such notice %hall he subs[:Int,11]11 in The 8,11-ng tormÂ· 2 A.1,1 4-\~. < 1 ~ ( 1 Itilitie,; il,.1 re,ult til- th, Dc, eleplnent Rego Committee Inceting. al,J. *ectilin 2: Flat Filing 1 ~ COPYRIGHT FORUM PHI LLC Nolice is hereh> Ii,en to the general public 01'the approial of a ite specilkÂ· development 0(do E-U .&'U.1,19 WHF.REAN. ihe Â·Â·\,pen (Â·il> Coulâ€ž,1 has re~ ieâ€žÂ·ed and conâ€ždered [he de,elormen[ Puisulint to ('hapter 26.490 - Appro il Doe unwits. the record m ner. of Lots 2 and 1 whall proposal under the :irplicahk pro wm ot' the Municipal C ikle as ident tied herein. opened a Jul> plan. and the creation of a,ciled prnpen, right. valid for u period 1,1 three { 34 >earb. linda Manning, Cia Clerk ~ Shien St~dron. May*- prepare and .uhmil a Subdâ€žÂ·ision Amendment I'lat tu be reviened to ensure vach item and pursumil In the I.and LIse (Cod: iII' th,: Cil> uf Aspen and lili: 24. Arliele 68. 01â€žrado n,iticed public 11:aring. cunhidered Ihe â€¢,pplic:Illim. recei,ed pre,enlition from the Applicant. conditiâ€žn iiI' apprewil is documented w the #,laction 01 the c timmunit> 1)câ€¢Â·chipment Re, â€žcd Statutes. pertaining W the IhI lou ing described pri.pert): FiN Amendment zo the FINALLÂ¥, adopled. passed and approied this 21 day of May, 2014 taw,idered 11x commenb and remmxnd.tii.in, â€¢f the (enimunit> Doeltipment [)irectur. Ihrector. the ('it> Engineer. und the C'i[> Altâ€žme> prior In fin.,1 .ignalure, h> the N!â€žor and Anhur O. Ptister 1Â·ult> Dcuel.,ped I ands % ubdivision I tils 2 ilnd 3. CAy of Aspen. 111[kin considered comments and recommendatiâ€žns [rom other memhers iii Cit> siall and referral recordation A IXÂ·#elopment Agreement is n.4 needed agencles. considered cummenth and >uggestions 011,red b, members of the public. cunsidered C ount. Gili.rado. a: inore full) Ascribed in Cil, ut .Aspen Cit> Coun:Â·11 Ordinance Nci . Series 2014 question resfinses b> stall'and the Â·ipplicant. :ons,Jered comments und discussion b> rellou the Subdivisiâ€žn Â·linendmeli Plat shall grant a perpetual 30-fiw uideÂ· access easement through REA LE.-ui, cÂ·Â·2 hi - L â€žuncil nwmbers: and, 1 i,t 3 for Ihe purrK,0 of pro, iding :Ide,lu:Ile :icceâ€ž 10 1.,9 2. I he easement shall be gener,Ill> Aothing in this appro,al bhall ekempt the development order thim Â·Â·ubsequent mieus and UAd. Mannink Cit, C'lerit < Ste,Zen Sk,Mron. Ma,or WHEREAS, the Aâ€¢.pen ('ityÂ· C(,uncil tind, Ihal the de,elurlnem propohal nith certain along the alignmenl *,1-th,Â· e\iftiny dri,eâ€ži,> . approvals required b> Ihisapproial â€ž1 the general rules. regulation. and oidinances orthe Ciii 01 uindilioils *ched mÂ·ts lir ewe,6 all applicable development stand.,rds lit'all applicable land use Afpen proi ided thlit fULÂ·h Te# ieus and apprm :11% dre nul inconsisient u ith [hi. al,pruial Nvic#, a~ identilied hercin: mu The subdi'.ision planhall caintain a note prohihiling! J,Â·#hipment alne the 8060-1'001 ele,atii,n , Approved as to form: line on Lot 2. ex,Â·p: 11Â· reasonable necewr, ic,r ul,111> infrastructure. stonn wÂ·ater miligal,un. 0- 0.-7=~ SHEET TITLE Ihe approval granted hereb, shall be suhiect w JII rights of reterendum and judlcial mie,. 1]le inalnleÂ·nunce or restoralion of natiâ€ž landbcdpe. and â€ž ildfire mitigation needs. period 01 [ime pernlitted by law lor the eierci.c tir iuch rights 51,2,11 11â€ž1 begin lo run until ilie J*mes R. True. City Anorney W x No 12. Sines 20:4 ( *Jinanic No 12, Serle, 201 1 Faye 1 014 Ordmalice 40 I 2. Serie' 2/3 1 Â·1 4 Page 2 0! 4 Page3014 (*dinan~ 4 12, Serie, 2014 Zl-002 Pagc 4 orÂ·i INDEX OF PRIOR APPROVALS .... FORUM PHI 715 West Main Street. Sune 204 Aspen, Colorado 81611 P 970 279 4157 F 866.770 5585 511 LAZY CHAIR 511 LAZY CHAIR LOT 2 LLC 511 Lazy Chair Aspen, CO 81611 Zoning Allowance & Project Summary Project Name Prop-Id De-lopment |Single Family I Ne# Cor-uction parc.. k73511302002 / / STEVEN * | WILSON ~ Z- D-ct |RR \ 402127 o\ Alic,wed Allow,d Prop-d Propoeed \ CA__,A / 8*backs Existing (Principal) (Acce"ory) (Principal) (Acce"ory) R-mnce \Â«--4 Front N/A 14/A N/A 30ft N'A 26.710 130D Rear N/A WA N/A 20ft N'A 26710.130.D Combined Front/Rear N/A N'A N/A 50ft hi/A 26710130 D Side N/A N/A N/A 20ft 14/A 26.710 130 D CONSULTANTS Combined Side N/A N'A N/A 40ft 14/A 26710130D D,stance between Buildings N/A NfA N/A N/A 14/A 267101300 SURVEYOR Corner Lot N/A N/A N/A N/A NA 267101300 Tuttle Surveying Services 727 Blake Ave Glenwood Springs CO 81901 Suppl,men'.1 8...Itd-, Irdo Exi~ting Required Prop-d Refelence (970)928-9708 Net Leasable/Comm SQ FT N/A N/A N/A 26710.130D Jeff@tss-us com Open Space % No Requirement No Requirement No Requirement 26710.130. D Site Coverage N/A N/A hi/A 26.710.130 D CIVIL On-Site Parking 2(+) 2 3(+) Roaring Fork Eng neering PO Box 9554 Aspen. CO 81611 Eumple of SH, Coviage &-g Proposed Rebrenc, (970) 448-7474 Gross Lot Area (sq R) N/A N/A ~26710.130 D RichardG@rfeng biz Area of Building Footprint (sq ft) N/A N/A |26.710 130 D SIte Coverage % WA N/A |26710130 0 GEOTECH CTL Thompson Tmnslirabl, Divilopm- Right (TOR) Rece,ved TOR Certrficate Sent TOR Certificate Transferred TDR Ceroficate STRUCTURAL Lind Value Summe Ac'*V/- Re'll'll TBD Land $3,450,000 Prtlon County A-isor Improvements $265 800 PRIon County All'll Total $3.715.800 PRkin County Assessor CONTRACTOR Kevin McCIure PO Box 6957 Net Lot Area Snowmass Village. CO 81615 Project Name (970) 379 9088 KvrMcCIure@gmall corn Zon, Dill,Ict R,901-iâ€¢ 4.nce 7/110014 DATE OF PUBUCATION Min. Gross Lot Area (per RR) 2 Acres |26.710 130 Min. Net Lot Area (per RR) 2 Acres ~26.710 130 Lot Stz, Pir Surviy 104.597.56 4 R Rd'-rice Reductions for area with slopes 0%-20% (100% of parcel area to be Survey included in Net Lot Area) 29,017.65 x 100% = 29,017.65 sq n 26 575 020-1 Reductions for area with Nopes 20%-30% (50% of paroel area to be Survey induded in Net Lot Area) 53 554 50 x 50% = 26.722.75 aq ft 26.575 0201 Redudions for area with elopes greater man 30% (0Â°6 of parcel area to be Survey induded in Net Lot Area) 22,025.41 x 0% = 0 sq ft 26 575 020-1 Z 7/11/14 8040 GREENLINE Total Ama Riducions 29,017.65 + 28,722.75 +0â€¢ 55,740.40 sq n Z 3/28/14 PLATAMENDMENT Ntlot All 155.740.40.* 1 1 PROJECT NO 1405 DRAWN BY: SMW Allowable Floor Area Project Name COPYRIGHT FORUM PHI, LLC Allowable Floo,A- R,1-0.1 55,740 40 - 50,000 = 5 740.40 Per RR, Use R. 15 Code for determining Allowable floor area R- 5740 4 / 100 = 57 40 15 Code Lotiwith 50,000+ sq ft 6,600 square feet of floor 57.40 x2= 114.80 area plus 2 square feet of floor area for each additional 100 6.300 + 114 8=6714 8 26 710.130 D 10 ReferencingÂ· square feet in Net Lot Area, Allowable Floor Area = 6714 8 26 710 050 D 10 Unl'll' Approval~ klir-- No unique approvals SHEET TITLE Rok'Inco Z1-003 INo vanances Eimplono R,hrince First 250 sql R exempt NET LOT AREA Garage Exemption Next 251-500 Z ft is 50% exempt Table 26 575 020 D 7 Deck Exempt,on Area exempt up to 15% of the allowable FAR 6714.8 x.15= 1007.22 sq ft 26 575.020 D 4 01Â» .... Maroon Creek aub 6'of Course 1 S T AM_E- N -D- M_ -E- N T 87777*E FINAL PLAT 45,00 OF THE ARTHUR 0. PFINTER FULLY DEVELOPED LANIE SUBDIVISION EXEMPTION 51 1 LAZY CHAIR DRIVE, ASPEN COLORADO, 81611 4 4. f CITY OF ASPEN. COUNTY OF PITKIN, STATE OF COLORADO lii % 7% Lib THE PURPOSE OF THIS PLAT E TO AMEND AND UPDATE DEVELOPMENT '77'57352 ALLOWANCES AND RESTRICTIONS FOR LOTS 2 AND 3 OF THIS SUBDIVISION TO 180.00' I.- 90 = % CONFORM TO CITY OF ASPEN ORDINANCE 12, SERIES 2014. r \ 11 70.00 1& \ 13 16 LEGEND AND NOTES: CFRTIFICATF OF DEDICATION AND OWNERSHIP KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS: - a INDICATES FOUND MONUMENT AS DESCRIBED 9Â©4 War#'mfi 120.00 / - 0 INDICATES SET NO.5 REBAR & CAP MARKED LS 33638 THAT THE UNDERSIGNED________________ BEING SOLE OWNERS IN FEE SIMPLE OF ALL THAT REAL PROPERTY BEING MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: - DATE OF SURVEY: MARCH. 2014. LOT 2 & LOT 3, ARTHUR O. PFISTER FULLY BEVEL-OPED LANDS SUBVISION EXEMPTION /02 4 4 /7/ T +/- ACCORDING TO THE FINAL PLAT RECORDED IN PLAT BOOK 42 AT PAGE 45 FLOOD PLAIN" PER FEMA FLOOD INSURANCE RATE MAP, PANEL 203 OF 325. - SAID PARCEL IS ENTIRELY WITHIN 'ZONE X: AREA DETERMINED TO BE OUTSIDE OF 500 YEAR k N \....t 2 , - LEGAL DESCRIPTION CONTAINING 2.4 ACRES AND 2.0 ACRES RESPECTIVELY, MORE OR LESS, HAVE CAUSED THE DESCRIBED REAL PROPERTY TO BE SURVEYED. LAID OUT AND PLATTED AS SHOWN ON THIS LOTS 2&3 OF THE ARTHUR 0, PFISTER FULLY DEVELOPED LANDS SUBDMSION EXEMPTIO ARTHER O. PFISTER FULLY DEVLOPED LANDS SUBDIVISION EXCEPTION, 511 LAZY CHAIR DRIVE, ASPEN CO 81611 ..........0 ACCORDING TO THE FINAL PLAT RECORDED IN PLAT BOOK 42 AT PAGE 45, PITKiN COUNTY. CO. CITY OF ASPEN COUNTY OF PITKIN, STATE OF COLORADO , ~ - BEARINGS ARE BASED UPON A NO. 5 REBAR WITH A YELLOW PLASTIC CAP L S. 9184 FOUND AT THE SOUTHWESTERLY CORNER OF LOT 3 OF SAID FINAL PLAT AND AT THE WESTERLY ANGLE & 1 280.00 ' QU DAY OF -__--_, A.D. 2013. POINT OF SAID LOT 3 ALSO BEING THE SOUTHEASTERLY CORNER OF SUBJECT LOT 2 IN WITNESS WHEREOF SAID OWNER(S) HAS CAUSED HIS NAME TO BE HEREUNTO SUBSCRIBED THIS - THIS SURVEY DOES NOT REPRESENT A TITLE SEARCH BY THIS SURVEYOR TO DETERMINE , OWNERSHIP OR TO DISCOVER EASEMENTS OR OTHER ENCUMBRANCES OF RECORD. ALL INFORMATION RY: OWNERS Fo,ed Na 5 Rit, .;\ PERTAINING TO OWNERSHIP, EASEMENTS OR OTHER ENCUMBRANCES OF RECORD HAS BEEN TAKEN -, Mow Plitlc C, LS ~9184 LLC, DATED EFFECTIVE NOVEMBER 2. 2012 AS COMMITMENT NO. FILE NO PC12003032. STATE OF ) &E FROM TITLE INSURANCE COMMITMENT ISSUED BY ATTORNEYS TITLE INSURANCE AGENCY OF ASPEN. COUNTY OF_____..O SS. H77-551 250.00' The foregoing document was acknowledged before me this _--__- k COMMUNITY DEVFI OPMENT DIRECTOR APPROVAI 2014, by day ot 30' ./. I.-./4/ p./urn. 01 i ~~TL.U.OFLOTI SUBDIVISON EXEMPTION, 511 LAZY CHAIR DRIVE, ASPEN CO 81611, CITY OF ASPEN. COUNTY OF PITKIN. WITNESS my hand and officiol seal. l THIS THE AMENDED ANAL PLAT OF LOTS 2 & 3, ARTHUR 0. FASTER FULLY DEVELOPED LANDS 1 1 STATE OF COLORADO LAND USE CODE BY THE CITY OF ASPEN COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DIRECTOR REVIEWED AND APPROVED FOR COMPLIANCE WITH THE APPLICABLE PROVISIONS OF THE CITY OF ASPEN X> THIS____DAY OF , 2014. TO THE EXTENT THAT ANYTHING IN THIS PLAT IS Lot 3 if\/fU//~ INCONSISTANT OR IN CONFLICT WITH ANY CITY OF ASPEN DEVELOPMENT ORDERS RELATING TO THIS PI AT APPROVAI CERTIFICATE PROPERTY OR ANY OTHER PROVISIONS OF APPLICABLE LAW. INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO OTHER APPLICABLE LAND USE REGULATIONS AND BUILDING CODES, SUCH OTHER DEVELOPMENT ORDERS OR THIS AMENDED PLAT HAS BEEN APPROVED BY THE MAROON CREEK CLUB 4 2.00 Acres +TiÂ¥/79//1 APPLICABLE LAWS SHALL CONTOL. IN WITNESS WHEREOF THIS DAY OF A. D. 2014. RY / f 0 P F /9//// REPRESENTATIVE .1111+1 3, // ./ 11I CITY OF ASPEN COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DIRECTOR STATE OF ) ) SS. Fmnd Na S R,bo, / CITY ENGINEER: COUNTY OF___________) , .90~00'00Â»W / .~ ~~t' /'/N9OÂ·00'06-W La ,@184 ~~ ~ ~ 135.00 ~f / 100.00 THIS PLAT WAS REVIEWED FOR THE DEPICTION OF THE ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT SURVEY REQUIREMENTS The foregoing document was acknowledged before me this ...... THIS _ DAY. Of __ OF 20_. day of ___________________ 2014, by ___________________. t\\ 4 WITNESS my hand and official seal. \ CITY ENGINEER TITLE CERIFICATEÂ· i, AN ATTORNEY LICENSED TO PRACTICE LAW IN THE STATE OF PLAT: SCALE 1' = 50' SURVEYOR'S CFRTIFICATF COLORADO, OR AGENT AUTHORIZED BY A TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY, Do HEREBY CERTIFY THAT I HAVE EXAMINED THE TITLE TO ALL LANDS SHOWN UPON THIS PLAT AND I, JEFFREY ALLEN TUTTLE, DO HEREBY CERTIFY THAT I AM A PROFESSIONAL LAND THAT TITLE TO SUCH LANDS IS VESTEED IN SURVEYOR UCENSED UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF COLORADO. THAT THIS PLAT IS , FREE AND CLEAR OF ALL V/CINITY MAP.Â· .SCALE C = 1000' A TRUE, CORRECT AND COMPLETE PLAT OF THE AMENDED FINAL PLAT OF LOTS 2&3 LIENS AND ENCUMBRANCES (INCLUDING MORTGAGES, DEEDS OF TRUST. JUDGMENTS. ARTHUR O. PFISTER FULLY DEVELOPED LANDS SUBDI VISION EXEMPTION, 511 LAZY CHAIR DRIVE, EASEMENTS, CONTRACTS AND AGREEMENTS OF RECORD AFFECTING THE REAL PROPERTY k { 11.l f 1. 249 1'~pit,r'- - t,~, hk p - ASPEN. CO 81611. CITY OF ASPEN. COUNTY OF PITKIN. STATE OF COLORADO, AS LAID OUT, IN THIS PLAT), EXCEPT AS FOLLOWS: 3 PLATTED, DEDICATED AND SHOWN HEREON, THAT SUCH PLAT WAS MADE FROM AN -,1 ~â€ž~ , ,-- ACCURATE CONTROL SURVEY OF SAID PROPERTY BY ME, OR UNDER MY SUPERVISION IN THE FIELD WHICH BALANCED AND CLOSED WITHIN A LIMIT OF 1 IN 15.000 (WHtCH COMPLIES WITH COLORADO PROFESSIONAL STANDARDS FOR ALTA/ ACSM LAND TITLE .Ad 1 44 *21 SURVEYS) AND CORRECTLY SHOWS THE LOCATION AND DIMENSIONS OF THE LOTS, DATED THIS _ DAY OF ______________ A.D., 2013. EASEMENTS AND STREETS AS THE SAME ARE STAKED UPON THE GROUND IN COMPLIANCE W!TH APPLICABLE REGULATIONS GOVERNING THE SUBDIVISION OF LAND. TITLE COMPANY: 6~/ i rao <r.7 -57727 N 146.. IN WITNESS WHEREOF. 1 HAVE SET MY HAND AND SEAL THIS -_- DAY OF AD., 2014. AGENT . 7 U...129,12REE, RD- OR I - 1 .4 JEFFREY ALLEN TUTTLE, P.L.S. #33638 L # . 2 ./ i.4 ' .' 9 0 1 ASPEN CITY COUNCIL APPROVAL COLORADO ATTORNEY REGISTRATION NO. '.--/. 1 1- 4* P L V<A 0 1 U l, h U -- . i ATTORNEY THIS 1ST AMENDMENT FINAL PLAT OF THE ARTHUR O. PFISTER FULLY DEVELOPED LANDS SUBDIVISION QI EXEMPTION WAS APPROVED BY THE CITY OF ASPEN CITY COUNCIL ON THE i i -96 f Â·1;Â£*A: 1, AND RUN WITH THE PROPERTY. THE PLAT SHALL BIND. BE CHARGED UPON AND INURE TO THE BENEFIT OF ANYONE OF THE CLERK AND RECORDER OF PITKIN COUNTY, COLORADO AS RECEPTION NO. ______ THE 1) RUN WITH THE LAND. THE PROVISIONS Of THIS PLAT AND THE OBLIGATIONS CREATED HEREUNDER SHALL BURDEN AS ORDINANCE NO._-SERIES OF --AND RECORDED IN THE OFFICE ACQUIRING OR OWNING AN INTEREST IN THE PROPERTY AND THEIR RESPECTIVE GRANTEES, SUCCESSORS, HEIRS, DEDICATIONS AND EASEMENTS TO THE CITY OF ASPEN AS SHOWN HEREIN ARE HEREBY ACCEPTED. Clnck uni Recorders 0.9 .,/%'2Â·252 'Â· g EXECUTORS. ADMINISTRATORS, DEVISES. AND/OR ASSIGNS, SIGNED THIS__DAY OF .-.-. 2014 This Pjot is accepted for filing in the Office of the Clerk ond Recorder of Pitkin County. Colorado. this- clay of 2014. Plat Book , on Page 814 - L~ ' 1 STEVEN SKADRON, MAYOR ond Reception ne #Imm-9 ATTEST: UNDA MANNING, CITY CLERK Clerk ond Recorder , TUTTLE SURVEYING SERVICES Acâ‚¬*4 to CotorGdo ... lou must comme-I any 2*gat clthon based ~pon any ckfect w, 727 Blake Avenue .e 1 ST AMENDMENT 511 LAZY CHAIR DRIVE, Dr- by: SRB/JLW thts s.in>ov unthin #Am y:ars aj,0, 1,0,i .A,Â¥' dwcon;e, n,c' de./*C~ . no event mav Glenwood Springs, Colorado 81601 w. 06/23/2014 any < Â£:ton bas*,1 upon any de*ef tn 'Aw su-Gy 6, commrnced mon than Un years (970)928-9708 (FAX 947-9007) .fhem 'A, 41" d me "rÂ«.Ar':hon shown TUTTLE SURVEYING SERVICES FINAL PLAT ASPEN CO 81611 4.,00'a Email- jeffetss-us. com 6 X Maroon Creek Nl 2'32' OrE N1282'05'E S ~ , 91~K./ .... HISTORICAL TOPOGRAPHY Maroon Creek Club LOT 2, FINAL PLAT OF THE ARTHUR 0. PFISTER FULLY DEVELOPED LANDS SUBDIVISION EXEMPTION Golf Course ~ - indicates stopes of 0-20% fno hotch/ng) 29017.65 S.F., AREA 28.9X AS RECORDED ON APRIL 14, 1997 IN ~~ - Indicates slopes of 20%-30% (Dots) 53,554.50 S.F. AREA 51.2% PLAT BOOK 42 AT PAGE 45 ~ - Indicates slopes of 30% and greater (Dashed) 22,025.41 S.F., AREA 19.9% - This Improvement Survey was performed in March, 2014. IN THE OFFICES OF THE PITKIN COUNTY CLERK AND RECORDER - This area is In Zone X (area outside of 500 year flood plain) per FIRM #08097C0203C dated June 04, 1987. COUNTY OF PITKIN, STATE OF COLORADO - Due to snow cover ot time of survey some improvements and topographical features LEGEND 0tM) Nola -Ef . may not be shown, some of the site detail has been taken from previous surveys. - s FNDICA;El FOUND MONUMENT AS IESCf#BED GRAPHIC SCALE - O IND;GAIES SET /0.5 REBAR & CAP W,liRKED LS 33SM S 7727' 335.00' LINE TABLE - DATE OF SURIX JULY 13. 2012 55" 6 30 0 " 30 60 12~ LINE LENGTH ~ ii ioog N 55Â·13'00"E - BEARNGS ARE BASED UPON A NO. 5 RES,AR Nâ„¢ A YELLOW PLASTIC CAP L.5. ~8184 FOUND AT THE BEARING 4 --2-1 SOURNIBE=ar COf,20,-LOTJOF-&40,7#4Â£PlATANOITIME-IES,ZEKINGYEPONTS,-S~DLITJAUT C IN FEET) BEING 11â‚¬ SOUNEASTERLY CORNER OF SUUECT LOT 2 CURvE TABLE USING A BEAR,NG Of N 09 5948- BET,EEN TWE 77% DESCRBED MONUMelm 1 inch = 30 ft CURVE LENGTH RADIUS CHORD CHORD BEARING DELTA TANGENT - TH#S PROPERTy #S slaECT I EASD,ENTL mGHTS Cf WAY AND/oR REQ,EMENTS AS NOTED OR SHOWN W 215.00 92.23 N83'43'07"W 24Â·46114" 47,21 THE RECORDS OF THE P#mN COUNTr CLERK AND RECORDER. ts-_37_ - : 1% 02 79.28 345,00 79.11 S77Â·55'00"E 13Â·09'59" 39.82 - ITY OF ASPEN ZONING: RR (RURAL RESIDENU,4il) V 0 130.60 185.76 127.93 N75'21'32"E 40'16'56" 68,13 4 9 f 2.2#<4 ;1E_5#1 - 04 254.10 250.00 243.30 N 26 05'56"E 58'14'08" 139.25 DISCOVER EASEWENTS OR NHER EN.veRANCES OF RECORD. AU INFOAMANON PERTAINING TO O...9 - 11#S SUR,EY DOES NOT RERBIFT A 17[E SEARCN BY â„¢B SURIEYDR 70 0Â£18/NE 0,Â»ERSH~ 00 70 2 --41--4-1-2 . 1 1Approil*ote Areal /4 4, Â·;.9 .1,Â» 1 ~'rY<~1~16,42IE-E FWI 1~ EASSENTS OR 0â„¢0% ENCUMBRANCES OF RECORD HAS BEIN TAMEN FROM A TmE COMMIâ„¢ENT ISSUED BY ATTORNEYS mLE QUARAArrf FUND. INC MlED /INE 22. 2012, COM,An,ENT NO. PC12002974 - \:-- ., r. DIst. 6rce 7,14 \ -THIS PROPERTY IS SUBJECT TO THE FOLLOWING EXCEPTIONS PER SAID Imf COMMITMENT: 1â‚¬k -r - -c - 7, Rights to ditches ond reservoirs used in connection with such water rights ond right of the proprietor twâ‚¬_X_nok _ â€ž x2*5 5 of a vein or lode to extrcct cnd remove his ore therefrom, should the some be found to penetrote or intersect the premises as reserved in the United St'tes Potent dated April 3, 1896, and recorded August 26, 1911. in Book 55 at Page 191, cs Reception No. 074888, 8. Terms, conditions, provisions, agreements and obligations specified under the Warranty Died dated \3~â‚¬124 November 7. 1950, and recorded November 15, 1950, in Book 176 at Page 79, as Reception No. - : I - 097937, and Correction Oecd dated November 7, 1958, and recorded November 10,1958, in Book 185 ut Poge 486,as Reception No, 107215. and in Book 242 at Page 369 A, 9. Any and all notes, easements end recitals as disclosed on the recorded plot recorded May 18, 1951, In Plot Book 2A ot Page 146, as Reception No, 098360. I /1/-09 - Â·1 04,4 Â·\ - 7--3/--1 0. 10. Terms. conditions, provisions, agreements and obligations specified under the Agreement dated May 10.1951, crld recorded June 1, 1951. in Book 175 at Page 513 as Reception No. 098386, and Quit *6-~r_ -1-2-\-~U Tree* 1~- "-'~ 1 1 ~. , ,~ 7 - 1.* 0 Claim Deed dated December 19,1969, and recorded December 19, 1969, in Book 245 at Page 114, os Reception No. 138379, and Agreement dated December 19, 1969, and recorded December 19.1969. in Book 245 at Page 116, as Reception No. 138380, ond re-recorded August 25,1972, in Book 266 ot Foge 253. as Reception No. 153537. 11. Terms. conditions. provisions. agreements and obligations specified under the Lease doted May 1, 1 ,1 l 3--9 . :L \1 / \\ , & 4-4-1 1967. and recorded February 10.1970. in Book 246 at Page 711, as Reception No. 139294, and 4 -- 1-=71-_-4-Â· \. 9 rn . L ' -' t - \\ Â· Amendment to Lecse dated November 27, 1969, In Book 246 at Page 728, as Reception No. 139295. 12. Terms. conditions, provisions, agreements and obligations specified under the Deed of Easement dated November 27,1969, and recorded February 10,1970, in Book 246 at Page 740, as Reception ..,. r'94'JU.:7% 4 No. 139296. 13. Terms. conditions, provisions. ogreements ind obligations specified under the Deed of Easement 14*2 I dated November 27, 1969, ond recorded February 10, 1970, in Book 2463 ot Poge 746, cs Reception / ./AD g 060 No. 139297. ond Deed of Easement dated November 28,1969, ,n Book 246 at Page 752, cs Reception - 4 1 t. '41 ... b.kÂ©.'......1-7.004 12â‚¬ /9 :r No. 139298. 23 aR,Â·4 dated February 2,1970. and recorded March 18,1970, in Book 247 st Page 424, cs Reception No. 14. Terms. conditions, provisions, agreements and obligations specified under the Deed of Easement el 15. Terms. conditions. provisions, agreements and obligations specified under the Grcnt of Easement r 139727. 0 1 If %42/ 441,9 4 *8 8 1 I dated October 27,1977, and recorded November 15. 1977, in Book 338 at Page 694, 08 Reception ~ 4044#40: 1- 0 1 0, rÂ· 1 E-4 i No. 199364. I 7// 4,9 0 16. Terms. conditions, provisions. agreementa and obligations specified under the Second Amendment to Lease dated November 14, 1977, and recorded November 18,1977, in Book 338 at Page 994, as 1,9 .,1 1- Reception No. 199510. t ~ f 1 1 ~ 40 -Â»res \~Lo~ --37lpt ' , 31~ 17. Terms, conditions, provisions, agreements and obligotions specified under the Quit Claim Deed dated 2 8 14' 1 1.19-11 4- i-----1 - 2112-Wl 18. Terms. conditions. provisions, agreements and obligotions specified under the Lease Agreement dated August 8, 1982, ond recorded August 25, 1982, in Book 431 at Page 614, cs Reception No. 243705. P 4/ Il#.1 a 1 i . 1 9 of 6 fi l 31 -Wolt Â·. 4 1 1 1 1 (/Â·61-9 4 1 A. Â·Â·Â»t SITE S 'nu 4 August 8,1982, and recorded August 25, 1982. in Book 431 at Page 627, as Reception No. 243707. \ 111 1 . r 14 f ve August 16, 1982. and recorded August 25, 1982, in Book 431 at Page 628, as Reception No. 243708. 0 .. . 9 /Â·Caill/'2 20. Terms, conditions, provisions, agreements and obligations specified under the Agreement dated ,Lk p Kn F t t. Gil.% . b Al f August 8, 1982. and recorded August 25. 1982. in Book 431 ot Page 617. as Reception No. 243706, r.-Â·t 19. Terms, conditions, provisions, agreements and obligations specified under the Leose Agreement dated \ \ ~,11-L 24/rn 14 I. Â·~I~<{3~~rn~,Â·â€ž GWO" Ilii h.w 5 11 *4*1|57 and Amended Agreement doted Januory 15. 1984, and recorded February 3, 1984, k, Book 460 at f \ / 4. e. g Â· t ~ ~ Co ~ t. ...MAROON CREEK R9*~Wd'-'e .6., Page 373, as Reception No. 257066. - - '4 4.. 21. Any and all notes, easements and recitols as disdosed on the recorded Tiehack Water Tank Site N \ i \:. Plotting Exemption Plot, recorded September 17. 1982, in Plat Book 13 at Page 88, os Reception No. \ 7. ir \ Dll. , GP#-13 1 ' 1 .----if 71 > '-Â¥7754Â·3 -'iÂ·-41 1 - 1 I ' June 10,1983, In Plat Book 15 at Page 5, cs Reception No. 250827. '1 ' alr OF A.*EN ' . 1 f 911- 'Fa./8Â¢215Â»0:1~ Â·Â·\\ f I 2, / 244234. and the Nehack Water Tank Site Platting Exemption Plat dated June 6, 1983, and recorded i a Lvky'*t Â®09,"44Â°ikl %/ h.':4 LEGEND Z January 5. 1984, and recorded Januory 6,1984, in Book 458 ot Page 752, as Reception No. 256282. N77'27'55"W Reception No. 363240. 22. Terms. conditions. prowmins, agreements and obligations specified under the Agreement dated I 01 23. Terms, conditions, provisions, agreements and obligations specified under the Tax Free Exchonge * oak Â· Â·10: 1 F.3 ..1-1*Â¢,Â«).1:4* 4 07 'A\'~ 260.00 .INC) 1 1 4*k ~F/i,Ph---~ Â·4;Ji -4 ' C':Fâ‚¬Lt :t.,-- J A/Â·~9 Agreement doted December 6, 1983, ond recorded Februory 3. 1984, in Book 460 at Page 366, c 1 .3 , Reception No. 2570:65. CD Inab Appe K 21 1 10 1 47 3 1 December 6,1983, and recorded February 3,1984, in Book 460 at Page 384, as Reception No. 3 Â·5*G,lq 12 fl'*493 24. Terms, conditions. provisions. agreements Ind obligations specified under the Quit Claim Died doted 0 Gamble.Ic * Ane & Found No. 5 Rebar \ \ 257067. H#STOmCAL mPOCRAPHY NOTE: 25 Terms, conditions, provisions, agreements and obligations specified under the Quit Claim Died dated January 19. 1984, and recorded February 6.1984, in Book 460 at Page 573, as Reception No. with Yellow Plastic Cap k \ - HiSmRICAL GRADE WAS DE-!EIMNED SY PRO/Cl'ING GRADE OF 257132. Â·Â« Aspen Tree 26. Terms. conditions, provisions. agreements and obligations specifiedi under the Quit Claim Deed dated 9,2 APPROIMATE UNIS1URBED AREA. L.S. #9184 â‚¬ 4 Cortallu,ood Tree .W NA\iÂ©88 ELEV. 802. 3 1 March 31, 1984, and recorded April 11, 1984, In Book 464 ot Poge 421, cs Reception No. 258682, and 0 relephone Pidestul Clarification Deed dated September 12, 1988, and recorded Februory 17,1989, in Book 586 ot Page 22 \ 1 147, as Reception No. 308906. r O Found Molum'nt 27. Terms, conditions, provisions. agreements and obligations specified under the Dedicationl Agreement Go 4 Nail / Lath CITY OF ASPEN for Roads dated August 13, 1993, and recorded November 12,1993, in Book 730 at Page 662, as b GPS--14 * A wa'er... 28. Terms, conditions, provisions, agreements and obligatlons specified under the Access Easement , -Ele I- med.châ€ž 1. JEFFREY ALLEN TUmE, BE]NG A PROFESSIONAL LAND SURVEYOR IN THE STATE Agreement dated September 8. 1993, and recorded November 12.1993, in Book 730 at Page 774, os 9, OF COLORADO, THIS IMPROVEME}IT SURVEY WAS PREPARED FROM AN ACTUAL Reception No. 363255. MONUMENTED LAND SURVEY OF â„¢E PROPERTY CORNER MONUMENTS. BOTH 29. Terms, conditions, provisions. agreements and obligations specified under the Special Warronty Died -Â·-GOD- Gas '/w 1 FOUND AND SET, UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION AND CHECKINCI THAT IT IS dated November 12,1993, and recorded November 12.1993. in Book 730 ot Page 747. as Reception c CORRECT TO THE BEST OF MY BELIEF AND KNO~EDGE AND MAT ALL Noter Ali .les 're s=!ed to / Ed.of....i CONTROL- SURVEY IN THE FIELD I,â€žCH BALANCED AND CLOSED nITHIN A UMIT OF 30. Terms, conditions, provieions, agreements and obligations specified under the Speciol Warranty Deed apprcumaje d,w hne ./.SONS. BOTH UNEAR AND ANGULAR VERE DETERMINED BY AN ACCURATE No. 363250. 1 IN is,000 (WHICH COMPUES MTH COLORADO PROFESSIONAL. STANDARDS FOR A dated November 12, 1993, Ind recorded November 12, 1993, in Book 730 at Page 793. os Reception LAND SURVEY PLAT AND THE CURRENT ACCURACY STANDARDS FOR ALTA/ACSM No. 363257. A-7- -7-- LAND TITLE SUR,EYS): 1 FURTHER CERTIFY THAT â„¢E IMPRO,EMENTS ON THE 31. 30 foot wide Access Easement gs reflected on the St. Luke's Community Health Resources, Inc. Lot ABOk OESCRIBED PARCE1 ON ?NIS OATE, MARCH 10< 20,4 EXCEPT UnuÂ·rr CONNECTIONS, ARE ENTIRELY MTHIN â„¢E BoliVIARIES Of â„¢E PARCEL EXCEPT Line Adjustment Plat recorded November 12, 1993, in Plat Book 33 ct Page 3, as Reception No. ~2, 46. j ~~ // i /// lot , AL ~â„¢fl44 0 1 48 1 4 33. Any and all notes. wsernents Ind recitals os disclosed on the recorded plot of Arthur O. Pfister Fully AS SHOWN ANUMANNERE IS NO APPARENT EVIDENCE OR SIGN OF ANY 353254 and the Fingl Subdivision Plat & PUD for Morcon Creek Club recorded November 15, 1993. in EASEMENT QÂ¥*NG OR 13~ENING ANY PART OF SAID PARCEL EXCEPT AS Plat Book 33 ot Page 4. cs Reception No. 363275. NOTED. ~4~ t Â· -2â‚¬ 32. Terms, conditions, provisions, agreements and obligations specified under the Water Service -V. Agreement dited July 26. 1993, and recorded November 15, 1993, in Book 730 at Page 797, os Reception No. 363258. vils. Ill i / ..F -Â£-/ Developed Landis Subdivision Exemption Plot recorded April 14th. 1997, in Plat Book 42 ot Page 45, as JEFFREAAEN 171~ng Â£S. *<8 , DATE/ Reception No. 403369, ond Consent Grid Ratification of Plat dated May 30, 2008, und recorded June 16. 2008. as Reception No. 550278. , 'O , 4,2 / ty<:Â» Wcter Service Agreement dated July 26, 1993. and recorded October 17.1997. as Reception No. 34. Terms. conditions, provisions. agreements and obligations specified under the First Amendment to 0 4 \ '--i \ 1 fl 409559. \Â»31 9 ~ .7*652' 3'GeÂ«*063 'LSERVICES IMPROVEMENT 511 LAZY CHAIR CO CO~ Â· vou must c<,mY,Â·w,q:c I y le# /C sed twon arw de- "1 72%@lake *venud Drown by: JT-DMC 1lx ts yunâ‚¬, ...w, three .Ws Vier I- i d,copersÂ·â€žch Â»ct /*, no event ma, ~â€¢ Glqmtood Springs, Colorado 81601 I ./. achon ball .... all dejec~ 01 RANCH ROAD Dote:07/08/2014 i 'l.wey be comm/'ll' more 'han Un yele (970% 92819708 (FAX 947-9007) SURVEY PLAT ASPEN, CO. 81611 Z: \2014\Phister 4,21* daf' M Â¢* ler'hcll. shown .Emal[C- jefftss-us. com \PhisterHistoricallot2.dwg Of- groon Creek Ctub Commo71 "E 190.00 2322 3-3/438 01 ~39Â¥3 S .... IMPROVEMENT SURVEY PLAT Mccroon Creek Club LOT 2, FINAL PLAT OF THE Golf Course \RTHUR 0. PFISTER FULLY DEVELOPED LANDS SUBDIVISION EXEMPTION - indicates sky>es of 0-20X (no hatching) 31,470. S.F, AREA 30% - indicates slopes of 20%-30X (Dots) 39.098 S.F., AREA 38% AS RECORDED ON APRIL 14, 1997 IN - Indicates dopes of 30% and greater (Dashed) 33,547 S.F, AREA 32X PLAT BOOK 42 AT PAGE 45 - This Improvement Survey wos performed in March, 2014. IN THE OFFICES OF THE PITKIN COUNTY CLERK AND RECORDER - This oreo is in Zone X (area outs;de of 500 year flood plain) per FIRM #08097002030 dated June 04, 1987. COUNTY OF PITKIN, STATE OF COLORADO 2* 3Â· Due to snow cover at Nme of survey some improvements and topogrophkal features Septic ~~~ ~ ~ \3 ----ii 377.27'ss- E Lids\, may not be shown, some of the site detoid has been taken from previous survego. LEGEND AND NOTES: GRAPHIC SCALE - m ND/CAmS FOUND MONUMENT A:S DESCASED X <141<1 4~ f.# 0/ 2&PtÂ· Â© --- ~--- - LINE TABLE - DAIE OF SURVEÂ¥. JIY 13, 202 - O *40!CllES SEET Nal REBAR & C'V MA~ED LS 33~38 LINE LENGTH | BEARING Ll 10.09~ N55'13'00"E - 0~RjNGS ARE BASED UPON A NO. 5 REBAR W!â„¢ A YELLOW PLASUC CAP U~~94 AX'*!D A 7,Kr \\\ 1.446% 7\442 r= ,). C 2 h -9 4.10 4 i , >< 1.,2. .4 \ ~ (IN FEET ) SOUTHÂ»ESTERLy CORNER OF LOT 3 OF SAID FWAL PLAT AND AT THE MES,ERLY PO]mT Of SA/D LOT J ALSO 1 &,ch = 30 K. IPI RE SIUTHEASIERLY Gllil OF SUBJECT LOT 2 \fith'jf Il 4 Â» \. C \. \ ~ ~ ~ 2 '12*h ll 1~ St CURvE TABLE USING A IMING OF N 09 59'48- BET*Â£24 â„¢E Tr,0 DESCR#SED MONUMENTS CURVE LENGTH RADIUS CHORD CHORD BEARING DELTA TANGENT - 1HIS PROPERTY I SUBICT TO EASEWENTS, RIGHTS CF WAr AND/ OR REQUIRE}ENTS AS NOIED OR SHO*N #4 01 92.95 215.00 92.23 N83 43'07"W 24'46'14 47.21 THE RECORDS OF RE PalleN COUNT'f CLERK AND RECORDER. 02 79.28 345.00 7911 577'55'00"E 13'09'59" 39.82 - al oF ASPEN ZONNG. a (RURAL RESIDENBAL) 03 130.60 185.76 127.93 N7521'32'E 40Â·16'56- 68.13 \ ALK \. - 1MIS SUR,EY DOES NOT REPRESENT A 7771Â£ SEARCH ly MIS SURVEÂ·~ 10 DENRM/NE OVIERSH#P OR m 64 254.10 250.00 243.30 N26-05'56"E 58-14'08" 139.25 DISCOVER EASEMENTS OR OTHO? ENCUMBRANCES OF RECORD AU NFORMAnON PERTANONG 10 0-ERSHIP EASSâ‚¬Nm OR OT}'EN ENCUWBRANCES OF RECORD HA5 8EEN TAKEN FROM A ITLE COMMID.,ENT JSSUE[} BY ATTORNEYS InE CUARANTr FUND, INC. DATEr JANE 21 2012, COMMITMENT NO. PC12002974 THIS PROPERTY 15 SUBJECT TO IHE FOLLOWING EXCEPNONS PER SAID 711LE COMMTâ„¢INT: HOUSE DETAIL 1"= 10' intersect the premises as reserved in the United States Patent dated April 3, 1896. and recorded 7. Rights to ditches and reservoirs used in connection with such water rights and right of the proprietor of c vein or lode to extract and remove h. ore therefrom. should the some be found to peretrote or \\ \\% Ill, 41< \4\ 'j August 26,1911, in Book 55 ct Page 191, os Reception No. 074888. 8. Terms. conditions. provisions, agreements and obligations specified under the Warranty Deed doted November 7. 1950, and recorded November 15, 1950. in Book 176 at Page 79. os Reception No. 414499Â«1 ~; ..flds-T \ 097937, and Correction Deed dated November 7, 1958. and recorded November 10, 1958, in Book 185 ot Page 486, 03 Reception No. 107215, ond in Book 242 ort Page 369A. 3/ 1 / Y 9. Any and all notes, eosements and recitols as disclosed on the recorded plat recorded May 18. 1951. in Plat Book 2A at Page 146, as Reception No. 098360. 114,~L~#1)\ ic \ t\\14\ \) #41.41 - F.F. 8040.2 10, 1951, ond recorded June 1, 1951, in Book 175 ot Page 513 as Reception No. 098386, ond Quit 0 4 YA j d / / e- 10. Terms. conditions, provisions, agreements and obligations specified under the Agreement dated May O acim Deed dated December 19,1969, and recorded December 19, 1969, in Book 245 ot Page 114, cs \1 1Â»0? 12))1,}1\411#i\-m < lili / 10 I Reception No. 138379. and Agreement doted December 19,1969, ond recorded December 19. 1969. 3\\44\\ \ \\4 1 4\ House 1 1 Â¢ 11 / q 71\ 4\Til .11<1 . 11, Terms, conditions, provisions, agreements and obligations specified under the Lease dated Moy 1. 533*'--61.40 in Book 245 at Page 116, os Reception No. 138380, ond re--recorded August 25.1972. in Book 266 at i / 31 Â£ f 8040.2 Poge 253. as Reception No. 153537. /--lealf)> -U---~-- /4/$111~2\ ~ 1967. and recorded Februcry 10, 1970, in Book 246 at Page 711, as Reception No. 139294. and P / i I f /0 1 Â£ , 0 \ ~ 4 Amendment to Lease doted November 27,1969, in Book 246 at Page 728, os Reception No. 139295, 5 % 1 \\ Gh_ \ e 70.00 \\\ 1 111) i; \Â¥4\\\\4\2 , , - ~ dated November 27,1959, and recorded Februcry 10, 1970, in Book 246 ct Poge 740, 09 Reception 12. Terms, conditions, provisTons, agreements and obligations specified under the Deed of Easement \ 9.-AS& 1/ f j 1 .ln 5 No. 139298. ) ~ < <(< < f ) 1 $ 6\ \ \ \\1'h\j.11 4 4 \ \ 111111481 1 9,8 11/~41 0 0 dated November 27, 1969, and recorded February 10. 1970, in Book 246 at Page 746, as Reception \ 14711~f 1~12 '7/9 /// '1)\ \J\\~4 3-\ House 13. Terms, conditions, provisions, agreements ond obligotins specified under the Deed of Eawmmt . . Ng'"01., 1 4.1. 4 No. 139297, and Deed of Eosement dated November 28, 1969, in Book 246 at Poge 752. os Reception \ 1\ ~~ No. 139298. \ 0 Ve 14. Terms, conditions, provisions, agreements and obligations specified under the Deed of Easement I'll dated February 2,1970, and recorded March 18,1970, in Book 247 at Poge 424. os Reception No. /A\L- 1 X \ \* .1- I \ 139727 \ e\ e< ),11.11 f Â· J 15. Terms. conditions, provisions, agreements and obligations specified under the Gront of Easement /,IN<\\ et j dated October 27.1977, and recorded November 15,1977. in Book 338 at Page 694. as Reception 1 7 11,0 \ f sp\\\1 \\\9~t-\62~~I\\ C\ .\1*'01-t I .~ -fiÂ°Â°a~hdff ill'111'Ell'j ~ %\\\ 1* %%4 \\ / No. 199364. 6 6 Lease dated November 14,1977. and recorded November 18,1977, in Book 338 ot Page 994, 09 l/111 1 111 '1 1 .1 17. Terms, conditions, proWsions, ogreements and obligations specified under the Quit Claim Deed dated 1 f \Lli.60 \ e 16. Terms, conditions, provisions, ogreements and obligations specified under the Second Amendment to patio 3 - Reception No. 199510. 1\\\\ a A August 8,1982, and recorded August 25, 1982, in Book 431 at Page 614, as Reception No. 243705. i 1\ \\ 1 \ A,-1 18. Terms. conditions, provisions, agreements and obligations specified under the Lease Agreement dated '' August 8,1982, and recorded August 25, 1982, in Book 431 ot Poge 627, as Reception No. 243707. / o Auguit 16,1982. ond recorded August 25. 1982, in Book 431 at Page 628, as Reception No. 243708. .6 , \1\\\ \ \\\\\ . , \ , \ : 1 \ Lot:,~3. 19. Terms. conditions, provisions, agreements and obligations specified under the Lease Agreement dated 20. Terms, conditions, provisions. ogreements and obligations specified under the Agreement dated 10.80_~33 - ond Amended Agreement dated January 15. 1984, and recorded February 3, 1984, in Book 460 ct \\Ir# Page 373, as Reception No. 257066. August 8, 1982, and recorded August 25. 1982, in Book 431 ot Page 617, as Reception No. 243706, 21. Any ond oll notes, eosements and recitals aa disclosed on the recorded Tiehack Water Tank Site 31\0\ Sh\) )1/1 \\ ~ tr-f//1 W' \ i||ZiNIH<1 (~~~1~\ca~ h x C k k x \\ 413\ 1/9 Plotting Exemption Plat, recorded September 17,1982, in Pict Book 13 at Poge 88, as Reception No. 244234, and the Tiehock Woter Tank Site Platting Exemption Pict dated June 6, 1983. and recorded June 10, 1983, in Plat Book 15 at Poge 5, os Reception No. 250827. 22. Terms. conditions, provisions, agreements ord obligations specified under the Agreement dated LEGEND January 5,1984, and recorded January 6,1984, in Book 458 4 Poge 752, cs Reception No. 256282. $ Oak 23. Termsr conditions, provisions, agreements and obligations specified under the Tax Free Exchange Agreement dated December 6.1983, and recorded February 3,1984. in Book 460 ct Page 366, as Reception No. 257065. 5 Â© Cm' 4.. 24. Terms, conditions, provisions, agreements and obligations specified under the Quit Claim Died dated 6 0 -dm. Oak Found No. 5 Rebor December 6, 1983, ond recorded February 3. 1984, in Book 460 ot Page 384, os Reception No. * P~ne.. with Yellow Plastic 6 j \ 1\ b ~ 111 '111\ \ \ 1 1\ \Il \\ \ 119 / 257067. 25. Terms, conditions, provisions, agreements and obligations specified under the Quit Claim Deed dated Adpen Tte/ L.S. #9184 257132. 2 ' 46 \\,3 1\%74*341 1 January 19, 1984, and recorded Februory 6, 1984, in Book 460 at Poge 573, as Reception No. C. - A Cononwood * NAVD88 ELEV. 8027.94 O- 26. Terms. conditions, provisions. agreements and obligations specified under the Quit Claim Died dated , SÂ« 11\ %4-Â» litiht \\\\~hm C~. Â« m I 43/ VICINITY MAP 1"=1000' Clarification Died dated September 12, 1988, and recorded February 17,1989, in Book 586 ot Page March 31,1984, and recorded April 11. 1984. in Book 464 at Page 421, cs Reception No. 258682, and I Te'ph~ne Pedestal 147. as Reception No. 308906. 0 F.&4 ....Inf 27. Terms. conditions, provisions. agreements and obligations specified under the Dedication Agreement Nail / Lcal SLE AS;~ U " 141 1,'M for Roads dated August 13, 1993. and recorded November 12,1993. in Book 730 ot Poge 662. as 4*r A Water Value . I *. Receptjon No. 3633240. 28. Terms. conditions, provisions, agreements and obligationg specified under the Access Eosement 0 4 SURVEÂ¥M'S CERIACATE: Agreement dated September 8, 1993, and recorded November 12,1993, in Book 730 at Poge 774, as -EleeÂ» ....... Reception No. 363255. --Ge- Gas hne 9 Q \\ \\ ~F~MDIO~M~m~N~TA~mml~~R~nEWRANIWINA~~~ATE 29. Terms, conditions, provisions, ogreer,1 ents ond obligotions spec fied under the Special Worronty Deed WONUMENTED LAND SUR~EY OF IHE PROPERTY CORNER MONUMENTS, BOTH dated November 12,1993, and recorded November 12, 1993. in Book 730 at Poge 747, as Reception Note All Trees are se~ed to 4 -1. M FOUND AND SET, UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION AND CHECK]NG; THAT IT IS No. 363250. appraumate 'w hne v CORRECT TO â„¢E BEST OF MY 8E1.IEF AND KNO,AEDGE AND THAT All- 30. Terms, conditions, provisions. agreements ond obligations specified under the Special Worronty Deed % 1,91 44 \ 4 1 9 :f.\:j 4*. t .9 le DIMENSIONS. BOTH UNEAR AND ANGULAR MERE DETERMINED BY AN ACCURATE 1 L.2 1 66Â· CONTROL- SUR,EY IN THE FIEU) WHICH BALANCED AND CLOSED WITHIN A UMIT OF dated November 12, 1993, and recorded November 12,1993. in Book 730 at Page 793, os Reception 0 .12 . '. 1 IN 15.000 (MICH COMPLES WIâ„¢ COLORADO PROFESSIONAL STANDARDS FOR A No. 363257. ~*Â¥1 LAND 1111Â£ SUR\â‚¬YS): 1 FURIHER CERTIFY THAT THE IMPROVEMENTS ON lHE Line Adjustment Plit recorded November 12, 1993, in Plot Book 33 ct Page 3, os Reception No. LAND SURVEY PLAT AND THEE CURRENT ACCURACY STANDARDS FOR ALTA/ACSM 31. 30 foot wide Access Eosement 09 reflected on the St Luke's Community Health Resources, Inc. Lot ABOVE DESCRIBED PARCEL ON BIS DATE. MARCH 10, 2014, EXCEPT UNUEY 363254 and the Final Subdivision Plat & PUD for Moroon Creek Club recorded November 15. 1993. in :214~ :124,2,,~ Plat Book 33 at Page 4, as Reception No. 363275. 2 3.N Wgis 2.- 4Â· .Â·'ru ORd**,21*IRDENING ANY PART OF SAID PARCEL EXCEPT AS Agreement dated July 26, 1993, and recorded November 15.1993, in Book 730 at Page 797, cs 32. Terms. conditions, provisions. agreements and obligations specified under the Water Service * 1 ~,9 *< 114'i " * 0' Reception No. 363258. a /O\V -SITE t# -fÂ· 2-06,199< 014*34/ 33. Any and all notes, easements ond recitals as disclosed on the recorded plot of Arthur O. Pfister Fully Developed Londs Subdivision Exemption Pict recorded April 14th, 1997, in Plat Book 42 at Page 45, as 4* \K \ AM U F Reception No. 403369, and Consent and Ratification of Pat dated May 30, 2008. and recorded June u,/ t ~ Â»f*A<*1011~mÂ£4 *6. 33%38 4' DATE 16, 2008. as Reception No. 550278. d.2 0 27 . I L,gj, Rout# i. t Â·, / 34. Terms, conditions, provisions, agreements ind obligations specified under the First Amendment to Water Service Agreement dated July 26, 1993, ond recorded October 17, 1997. as Reception No. N.hne 6,~ â€žF 409559. TUTTLE SURVEYING SERVICES AÂ©cord/ng to Co~orado .w. yo'u *nuat Â©04Â»wâ€žce my 4/ achen &~ed igion ony 4Â«,c' m 727 Blake Avenue IMPROVEMENT 511 LAZY CHAIR thts ,urwÂ¥ unfhm thr- Â¥e,ws qi/fe~ you RANCH ROAD Dcte:07/08/2014 test *%*er 'w.Â·/ delect M # eve- m- Glenwood Springs, Colorado 81601 Drom by: JT 1 / -y fega! acNon based up- *y dâ‚¬Â¢c, 1,â€¢ 14,$ s,m,ey be commeâ„¢;ed mâ€žre thon tÂ®71 yra,75 (970) 928-9708 (FAX 947-9007) SURVEY PLAT ASPEN, CO. 81611 /rom Me 'a~ Â« rA, ce, 4'Ag./1,4 5/3.7,LI h#eo,1 EmaU- flootsy-us.com 19 1 Creek Club Common 4'Ellu Afa,Toon N12'32'05"E <~ .32,05. 135.00 .... 511 LAZY CHAIR L ASPEN, COLORADO 4*/ ROA RING FORK Â£ IMPERNOUS AREA LEGEND ~ENGINEE RI N G Â®EROSION BLANKETS GRAPHIC SCALE ASPHALT DRIVEWAY 1 IN FEET i P.O. Box 9554 ~ pER vious p,ves linch = 40 lt. Aspen Colorado, 81612 ph: (970)948-7474 f:(866)876-5873 U GREEN ROOFS DRAINAGE BASINS Maroon Creek 04Â¢ TOW TOP OF WALL ELEVATION GoÂ« Course ~ BOW TOP OF WALL ELEVATION W 5 - W 5 - EXISTING WATER SERVICE \ -- TELEPHONE LINE Septic X Lids* \ . OVERHEAD ELECTRIC . ey .... . 96* 1 -S- . . GAS t f \ ..1 4 C+ -IS-WS- PROPOSED WATER SERVICE 294 -4.0 WL : VICINITY MA P 44 VÂ· * -liss -SS - PROPOSED SEWER LINE ' ELECTRICAL LINE 94. p PROPERTY LINE 41 -\ V PROPOSED CONTOURS , 4 \7 0 + -------- EDGE OF STRUCTURE EXISTING CONTOURS t \ 1, e \ 1 'Â·Â·. Powe t; : -------- FLOWLINE G. Â·PO~e \31 1 -ze t-*44Â»r 1 El -SP -1 - SILTFENCE 73:en--1 . 9.-1 \& Â© 6 -- if HYDRANT \ ~2-212.00 00 E 120.00 / WATER LINE VALVE A % 1/2 WV \44 * P<<1 *482 b N -Â·. 1 {4 8 ' 0 9 b Y 2Â·04 -2 , .ilb i . 4/ . . .6 ~_ 1~44 A<rek. 09 1 4 & 4 : :i .2/ 57? eet Z /5 f Table \ t, : %~ .7'~~~ ~SPEA~ S-1. / .04 Sheet Number Sheet Title Offsite -1___ _ 9'72733'* 2 93 / 260 08- 1 .\3& / 2 Drainage Basins t.' 3 Grading and Drdindge Found No. 5 Rebor L.S. 0,84 â€¢ 0 14 4 Utilities with yellow Plastic Cop bn â€¢ /U 1,000 ELI'I 8027 94 44 % 0 5 Fire Truck Sim. ~ 2 lr, SÂ» I m 6)11 , 1 .%6 1 / or, OF AspÂ£% \ A ap â„¢ 1 8 6 Erosion Control -- GPS-14 2( 1% 1 i '13 21 1 0 W 11 1 i 4 \3 8 JOB#:2014-17 NUM REVISION DESCRIPTION DATE DRAWN 8Â¥ 1-41 12 4% /2.00 Acres~ +/ Aot - - 1 8040 GREEN LINE REVIEW 7 9/2014 TRS 2Â» \ 9 / 3 b r C., oon Creek Club - CE . 1. ~ROKERTY UNb \11 ILI Z 7 ...4% - ~ /-5/5 CONTOURS - Em . 1 VARIFY IN FIELD l NOT EXACT TOPO 1 i / -1- -0 - U-1 03 / 9 / i ~.. I ---4 OQ i / - 1-1- 0- ~ i i \ \ '4 GRAPHIC SCALE Of 1 ~OFA...sly-E BA~-SIN~-1: 1- 0 i IN FEET } ..... 1 \4 --3170217 54 \ , , t 1 inch = 30 n. Â·:1 . r*0-2 95 )VIN ..~~ : :~:i 9%1: Â·. \0190=431 (vs '1 i i~ 5- 'h... ~PASFA~ 1 Th:IE ok COACENNA]obi. ' .. /%~. 0\ .!: 4 Time of Concentration it f :1 i t i// 1 , -V ; Offsite Basin 1 1/pul outputs t i :ili Overland Flow Time (TJ Only valid for 300ft of developed area \1 :ior 500ft of rural area /1 To = 0.395(1.1 -C)6 Top Elevation 8116 ft. i Bottom Elevation 8032 ft. ' Over Land Distance (Lu) 402 ft, S00Â·33 i If /1... .:, 84!N jÂ·J*IE Of CONCE~l,TRAIdld.% i': --i,Ji i Slope (Sol 0.209 ft./ft, : 1 } FL 4. L /)10-\. - 100 yi. runoff coeff. (100% 4 1 i z =47. h (i F S !*E B A 344 2 Runoff Coefficient, C pervious) (Equation 3-4,n the URMP) 035 -t- \ 1 '\. d A -647365.* SF ' Overland Flow Time (To) 9 96 Min 11:111 C=> \ 1\ . 0=6Â© -<TOC =79.59 Pli-N. /1 1 !illill ~- 11-..04.00= 131. CFS\Â·Â·Â·..# LCOA WATER TANK ~ 04 2 6 : Time of Concentration I. m . 2 MIL. GAL. .... : : \ Offsite Basin 2 Inputs outputs \.7-- t Only valid for 300ft of developed area Overland Flow Time (To) or 500ft of rural area Top Elevation 8116 ft -L 8030 ft 0.395(1.1 - C)411 Bottom Elevation Over Land Distance (4} 437 tt SoOÂ·33 Slope (So) 0.197 ft./ft. .: 1 : I Â· 100 F ,unoff coeff. ( 100% .. . 0.35 / f | B j Â· Runoff Coefficient, C pervious) (Equation 3-4 in the URMP) Overland Flow Time (TJ 10.59 Min - : 3 1 ~: ilillill 1 1-liE 'li Â· Peak Discharge Calculations 169 1 Hour(Pl] jOB # 2014-17 . . . CHECKEDBY RBG Return Peril 100 ~. Basin ID Total Area Imp. Area Impervious C Value Time of C Intensity Q Max From I=29P1/(10+Td)0 NOT FOR See(Dl) ft2 Percentage Table (Td) .789 ft3/sec 1 35309.2 0 0 00% 0 350 9 96 4 62~ 1.310 CONSTRUCTION 2 47345.06 0 0 00% 0.350 10.59 4 51~ 1.714~ OFFSITE 1 6 Z&9Le opejoloo 00Â¥80100'NadSV â‚¬289-918 (998 ) U VZteet6 (026) Nd MIVHO AZ\11 L LS AWNI 40 31Â¥0 NOild#HOS30 - NOISIABI 91 noz/6/2 MaIABB 3Nll N33bID ----- .... / 9..11) f ...... 4/ \ 1 Â· rE \ : \ ... - 10 a) 1.. . .7 a 1 A m CS.. t 1 . poc, i i 08 1 .... \ / \ GRAPH]C SCALE .. LÂ·... OFÂ»f BAIN l\ ~- k I IN FEET I . ':. A = 3%09>2.9 S A I \ 4.x: i I 1 \ / . 1 9 p 1 f /-\1 1 i : ' j \~ n \ N \ Peak Discharge Developed Calculations 1 :\ r.00-9.>06 MIN .... Â·Â· Return Per,0 5 POC 3 Basin ID Total Area Imp. Area Impervious C Value Time of C Intensity Q Mal 0\90= 1.Â® 0-fs ~Â· -- Â· ' ' '- ~~.~ Percentage From Table (TA :=299,/(10+TA' 78~ ft'/sec See(01) ft' \ ..t \ \ 6 1 17081.89 10239.83 599596 0.370 5 342 0.497 2 10421.9 3966.07 38.06% 0.280 5 3.42 0 229 . 3 4574,01 3008.13 65 77% 0.450 5 3.42 0.162 1 1 1 ~Total 32077.8 17214.03 53.66% 0Â·891 1 .~. t 1 I --40( ,: * 1 Peak Discharge Developed Calculations 1 Hour(Pl) 169 / i- ~ Return Per,[ 100 Total Area Imp. Area Impervious CValue Time of C Intensity QMax A > ' Percentage From Table 1=29P J<10â‚¬[J10 789 ft'/sec OE1111111 1 \ See(Dl) fe 1 N \\ \ /\ Â· , 1 17081.89 10239.83 59,95% 0 540 5 5.79 1.23 1 i 1* 5 38.06% 0.490 5 5.79 068 . : 2 10421.9 3966.07 -5/ . : 3 4574.01 300813 65.77% 0590 5 5.79 0 36 23 = i /1/1 1 44/ Total 32077.8 53.66% 2.24 01111111 \/ 1 . : 13*AL i i / 1 1 // 1 24.5/ Th. 82Â»N 2 \%~ -- i 4 -3445,04.9 F / ~ ~ Sub-80 Ama % Suage Flat Area Uounded up) (rounded up) Loca~ 5Â·y' 100Â·yr VOIUITE Localon / Tbl Val Required Required Requied Slage Requred ~A BMP Calcula# j Vout Required Demn~on 1/ (SD A M (sD Ic, M M M M \021 h % Â»Â» \9 - I p )#I'-vo. 10239 83 In~95% 0 12 170.82 17082 171 0 1710 SR Bed 32715 26843 328 SR Bed W \ -40 = 1 49 M }~L 1-PmvICk~ 684206 ... % t.. 15* i06.loUS 6455 83 1 ~ . 24rrâ„¢vois 3966 07 38,06% 008 69.48 6948 700 700 SR Bed 12553 120.95 126 SRBed 0 28.0= 1. ft CRS . 9..... 300813 6577% 0 13 4955 49.55 500 500 DryMI 114.49 9156 115 Drywell 1111!11 e / 32.*XS 156588 - 1 1. 1 -1111111 Toi 32077 80 53 66% 289.85 28985 291 0 291 569 00 To) Impervious Area 1721403 JOB # 2014-17 l . i / . 1 / TomIRequi. 860 00 CHECKED BY RBG /\: i Requ/ed Flal Afea (st] 291 00 NOTFOR CONSTRUCTION DRAINAGE BASINS 2 6 SNIE133NDNEI >IMO=19NINVOW BIVHO AZÂ¥1 L LS glglg 'Opeig S 00Â¥k:10100'NE]dSV â‚¬189-928 (998) u *2*Z-8*6 ~26) Nd AS NM NOUdlk]S30 - NOISIA M)#A323 3Nt-1 N33BD 0*09 .... r--- FIRE TRUCK TURN AROUND CENTERLINE PROFILE _-ADD RIP RAP TO END OF SWALE SCALE I"=20' HORZ. 1"=5' VERT. H.P.STA. 1+10.96 1% 44 3---//1 -- . K.8.61 H.P.ELEV.8033.02 .. 0040 Â· Â·Pvl STA+.1.10.23 ' 8040 7 - - PVI FEEV.8036.It \ GRADE BREAK STAÂ·.0â€¢37.24 _ ./498Â· VC7 r PROFOSED GRADE 0 .. -- r \1 LE~Li ELEV*8029.88 BVCS: O+37.21 1 1 3 %. BVCE: 8029.88 . u .~41.4.1[/ F.F.=Bop7. 44 \ EVCS:Â· 1+83.22Â· . 8035 lo 6Â· DRYWELL 8 \ EVCE: 8030.00 W NO CTS GY ROOF BRAINS \. 7 g Att m i - re ~ 8,2.-447 ------ 0 '04- . \ 27' 8030 0/ V \ M 4. ff Â·. &,00 1 ER LEVEL .PATIO ~ k.~ '' t ~ EXISTING GRADE , 0.- AND NOL AREA X. Â· 8025 A.52-p-- . FL 01* LINES Â· / 1331 .- / - --WALK~VT . ,., . j ~\ 8020 1 MAgERNFAT to ~% 1 V EL.051,51 . i EXISTING GRADE-1111~, ;I~~ I ' \ - PROPOSED GRADE Ck: - uPAER r. '\. \ LE~ i.\ . . N----43 PATIO TRE~CH DRAIN ~ :\ ... '4 0 WER ROUT TO SCREENED ROCFBED : 60/5 85 1. LEVEL 4 ...... . . 0 + 6 i i : ch % 0% -- s, F.F.=8027 .k . ) le -0 R 2 -1 4 0 ..MIGHPOINT FOR S WALES \ ..... 0 : M H Q 4 2 2 % 4 % % 0 0 \ 1 .... '11.::4: 23,- t + ORYWELL FOR '''Â· t \1 - 4 4 FOOL PATID Â·A * ~ MAIN i SR *0 UNDER PGRVIOUSLY NVE 9+50 1+00 ,+50 Ao.00 ~ \ LEVEA , ' FIRI TURNAROUtlo i F.F.=*40' i 1 DRIVEWAY CENTER LINE PROFILE ~<ADEEP INTERCEPTOR . / ~~GE ONTO LA /- ~ SCALE 1â€ž=20' HORZ. FLOWAINE \ 1 : 8080Â· ELF VA TION-~~ 0 t LINE DO NOT ;URPASS 8060 Â· *60 1 \\ . 4 j....TREN?e DRAIN- : Â· 1 rNL~TS iD SCRE~NED ROCK BtD / * 'Â·Â·. Fof SL opING N THK WES>~ 1 ' Â«,15' aolf 1â€ž- 4 VERT. 3 1.../ \\4. ..1 A 40 1 . 9 1 391\J. 1 . 0 , \ 5% 1 Â·Â·. 1 .. . / .55 1llllll \ \\ Â· i-,IRE *UCK FURN ARO+ND / Â· f Â· LoW LINES - /4 - f ....... . e Â·h '84Â» \ _. 2 --1, . Â· - -- *50 1lllIll 1 8140. . / . \ m / MNT@LINE: i ~ 2 2. *1 - \ /\ i gIvE*,1 y : Â· - L.P.STA.0+11.81 I *ENT#LINE: , --- GRADE BREAK STA.1+90 \ .. / it/ L.P.ELEV .8028.98 \ --\-t-'-I-- I.- -tÂ«t--3-- ' ' ' PKI STA.042Â£53 i/ GRADE BREAK STA.2.43.79. \ PÂ¥I ELEV.8028.98 l F ELEV=8040.00 /ELEÂ¥4039.20 1 K-3.62 25.43Â· vc-j BVES(O+11.81 .7 62,0 4 B VCE: 8028.98 1 0 4.6/1 -PROPOSED GRADE 1 E VCE: 8029.88 ~ ' EVCS: 0437.21 \ 0 % fit 4.51 ..75 \ Â·47 / 1. 742, 111!Iii : 1 1 - h 1 3-11'lili A- TRE4H DRAIN - t H.P.STA.1.76.19 j RbUT TO Nis~t l\ b/ H,P.ELEV.8038.91 .' 1 --- ~ 1 0:R#yomt; - i # // L:%:21:~END SECTION K.Â£91-7 EXISTING GRADE s 7 80* 'PVI STA.1462.90 -Â·1 ~~' ~'''~~~'~- ~8430 \ Â· PVI ELEV.8038.70 .1 . 108, 2014-17 J CHECKED By RBG - i i OFF*TE FLOWS 1 26.58Â· VC . GRADE BREAK 5TA.0+10.39 BVCSÂ· I+49.61 Â· E[Ev=*2198 i I * ' BVCEÂ·Â·8037.77 ' . NOT FOR 8025 EVCS:'1+76.19Â·. -_ 3 i . . E VCE:8038.9/ EUSTING GRADE~ ~-PROPOSED GRADE CONSTRUCTION 87.19 127 33 33 ma 2% 00 2. -2 - th 44 1% GRAPHIC SCALE 2+DO 1+50 1.00 0+50 11/ FEET, linch= 20Â¥t, GRADING AND DRAINAGE 3 6 9NIZ:133NIDN3 >12:103 9NIBVOW 7 1 19 â‚¬Â£89-928 (998) :1 n*L-8*6 (026) Nd g tg Le 'opejoioo uedsv 00~0103 'NadSÂ¥ Al NMV&10 0 NO#ldINDSBO SH.L *02/6/2 M3IAah 3Nll NEENS 0*08 .... C>* --0- ~~>-SEPTIC LIDS \EJECT SEWER TOFROM i 37 - - MAH. ROOM TO SANINRY \ \ -- O //' 1 5 yS MEM - -/ r--- 1 i: 1--_ / 21 -\9--/: H -- - R h - --- 3 7 E% 1 \7 CS 2& 1 . C A ZO NEW'ELECTRIC TO - \ 1 1 ' *CH. ROOM -1 ~ â‚¬0 \1/ 1 k EXISTING t. t~NATER LINE ' OVERHEAD BOWER j. polfiR pOLE .5 : -1 \ TO BE BEkRIED /1. ,- . \ : 1% 1/ 1 ,- / M \ 3. : : 11/ f // A t \ r RlllllIl ROUT'*Â·NE*j-INT*SERV/CE-/ ' ' \TO MICHAN(CAL ROOM / it Â·MECH ROOZ'4.F.=8015Â· =--{/ .% % . B . 1 / F . ; Ntt Hy@RANT t .11% : / 7 h j If .r / t. i .%21 4 0 i i ~â€¢ Ln â€¢ Ck 1 1 80410 / .1 41 ... 0 i EXISTING N.TER LINE-1 kE- EXIS~NG HYDRAN~ | ~ * ' f sow I Â¢> : t - i k -Ilitil JOB# 2014-17 1. : / CHECKED Sy REG i. ruF~/NE EXTENDS UPTO~pMIL.GAJ- --_I--_~_~~~~ ~ ~- 1 11/ NOT FOR E W 7-GAS CONSTRUCTION 1 COA WATER TANK -4 j / TOP OF TANK=8121Â· BOTTOM OF TANK=8083Â· UPPER FLOOR F.F 805/.5Â· GRAPHIC SCALE ~ IN FEET I linch = 20ft. UTILITIES 4 6 9NB33NI9N3 >180=19Nlk:IVOW 11919 sv 700 'NBdSV Â£289-928 (998 ) 4 klt,Z-AD6 (026) :4 Al NMVall NC>IldIH0S30 - NOISIA *3!/aa 3Nll N33219 0,09 , .... ~\.W ATER LINE : 1 1 --t Â» - 1 - : f f Z 1 , i / CD IE - i / Lili ILI / 1 . 0 Z m 1 1 1 \ I Ill 03 f M i E 11 -- a> X. .I \ \1 094 /\\ 1 : CD 2 6 , , 7 + Ii., < .. o . . CE \4 9 ~* FIRE TR UCK \TURN AROUND / 4 -~ i ~ ~ LENT ERLINE\ : R 29 4 1 : i 4 -E : 1 ... .... \R- OL 4 EDGE\OF PAVEMENT / 1 i 0 ' R 29 1 i > i i 1/ 1 % 1 1 : de,9 r- A < 34 i - - Nk W H 7'8RAN T | , ul : t I 1 N.E W E DGE OFF AVEf\tEN~/ lul I # . i i 1 /5 \ 1/ 4 â€¢%: ; if Elillill I. 1- 2 + , 1. 11l 1 2 2 EXISTINGWÂ·.ATER LINEn EXIS\ING HYDRANT : ' ... f.. : 030 *% 1 / ili!!11 / 1 A-lillill / i I 2 I Jo8, 2014-17 . f 1 / ' i i GRAPHIC SCALE CHECKED By RBG - - - NOT FOR : i i i t I IN FEET } CONSTRUCTION 1 1 Inch =10 ft. I . M LWATER LINE EXTENDS UP TO 2 MIL. GAL. --t:/ -1 : / COA WATER TANK TOP OF TANK=8121' - BOTTOM OF TANK=8083' UPPER FLOOR F.F= 8051.5 FIRE TRUCK SIM. 5 6 â‚¬289-92~L~98,)opi tztz-9~ 00480103 'NBdSV AR NMAG NOild!*OSIO - NOISMIN NOZ/6/Z M3IA326 3Nll N33ND 0*09 0 . 0 . EROSION PREVENTION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL NOTES ,$042 - 1. CONSTRUCTION ROAD, ENTRANCE, STAGING AREA AND PERIMETER EROSION .mt A CONTROL MEASURES SHALL BE INSTALLED PRIOR TO ANY SITE GRADING OR EXCAVATION ACTIVITIES. -7--- 1 . .. t Z STORM DRAINAGE STRUCTURES TO BE INSTALLED AFTER EROSION CONTROL METHODS ARE IMPLEMENTED. ALL DRAINAGE STRUCTURES TO BE PROTECTED ''Â·, , BANK STABILIZATION \ FPLACE HAYBAILS OR ~ ON SLOPES'SREATER \, 1,~ - _ / STRAW WATTLE BY EROSION CONTROL MEASURES SHOWN ON PLAN. .<. THAN 3:1 7--44LCHANNELS TO CA TOÂ» SE NT t 4'-.-461 1 CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR MAINTAINING ALL EROSION 1 CONTROL BMP 5 FREE FROM MUD, DIRT, DEBRIS, ETC. CONTRACTOR SHALL - N. .\111 1.1 1 1 ''' STABILIZE ALL DISTURBED AREAS WITHIN N DAYS OF DISTURBANCE. , \ 1(/,Irl m- GRAPHIC SCALE /....... 311.t {It.i<,f,/-4-i<\- . .\3~ - M.) 4 \ . \ d. CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE TO CHECK ALL EROSION CONTROL BMP'S CNI 00 .....hx -1 1 \ FB + - .1 - WEEKLY AND WITHIN 21 HOURS OF A RAINFALL EVENT TO ENSURE THAT ALL o 0-* - EROSION CONTROL MEASURES ARE FREE OF MUD, DIRT, AND DEBRIS. t.- 1 : \ 41/1 '\ 1* '1.1 ~l i P C \ 3\,f , ~ 5 I Inch = 20 ft. LU M 8 -INLET P I IN FEET 1 PLACE HAYB~ILS OR 5412~*~1~~;'~,~ 1~I'' j~ <\\ \\ \.O A 5. ACTUAL LOCATIONS OF ALL EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL MEASURES TO STRAW #ATTLE -3Â·... ~Â· BE FIELD MODIFIED IF NECESSARY BY CONTRACTORS ENGINEER. IN CHANNA S TO ~ g ~0 5 CATCH SEDIMENT . 042 6, EROSION CONTROL AND STORMWA TERMANAGEMENTPLAN AND BMPÂ·S - 11) CONFORM WITH THE CDPS PERMIT. \ 0 2 6 ~t/'-SIL T F..CE i.~ PRESCRIBEDEMP Â·S IN SPECIFIC AREAS AL Z OCW EDON THIS PLAN, 7. CONTRACTOR TO ENSURE THAT ALL RUNOFF PASSES THROUGH THE w if~ 490- 4 1 1\ -- 1 8. REVEGETATION PRACTICES SHALL FOLLOW ALL LAND DISTURBING \ ACTIVITIES IMMEDIATELY UPON COMPLETION OF SAID ACTIVITIES. IF '. C \4(/4/i)% ' // / A f REFEGETA TION PRACTICES AREDELAYED, THEN THEFINISHED TOPSOIL GRADE / t Â»Â» a BANK STABILIZ 4TI0N- 1.51'94 ... ' SHALL BE PROTECTED AGAINST WIND AND WATER EROSION WITH TEMPORARY ON'iLOPES GRE!ATER EROSION CONTROL BMP'S IMMEDIATELY UPON COMPLETION. THIN 3,1 . 1 9. EROSION CONTROL FENCING AND OTHER EROSION CONTROL MEASURES SHALL 1 \ ~3Â©~ . < S BE REMOVED AFTER ALL VEGETATION SEEDING IS AT LEAST 80*GERMINATED. O I {\ PHASING AND SEQUENCING NOTES: Q 1 f / \ 4 INSTALL STABILIZED CONSTRUCTIONENTRANCE -1 . \ t *i 2. SIL T FENCE SHALL BE INSTALLED PRIOR TO ANY GRADING. l. 0 \\ 03 &41.9. .; 1 \ Li : 3. TOPSOIL WILL BE STRIPPED AND STOCKPILED WITH REINFORCED SILT FENCE SURROUNDING STOCKPILE AND THEN SEEDED AND STRAWED FOR ~ ~ - STABILIZATION. \\\\ \\ 1 L \ ''~ ~ i. i Â£ ALL STRUCTURES ARE TO BE CLEANED ONCE DEPOSITED SEDIMENT REACHES //3 THE HEIGHT OF THE STRUCTURE. 4, BANK ST 212 1~N ~ 5. PIPES ARE TO BE FLUSHED ONCE SITE HAS BEEN STABILIZED. 0\90\0 J | ~ VEHICLES L E, 1/ING THE SITE. 1 6. CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FOR REMOVAL OF DIRT FROM j '\\\\\\\â‚¬\ 4 - INLET PR TEC ION j : 1 ~ A ... 3 \\ 1 \ ''\\\ \\ 1 /4941 7. EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROLS TO BE INSPECTED EVERY %21111111 1 \A\\\\\ A / SEVEN CALENDAR DAYS OR AFTER EVERY STORM EVENT THAT '40\\\\ \ / EQUALS OP EXCEEDS //7 -OF PRECIPITATION. \ .8 . N. 1 el 19 9 / R lillill \,i(,1. I Â£ 45&4)8#~ii i I Â£ -Â·--4ACE ~AYBA#LS OR / ST.OARDEROSION C./ROL ..OLS ST.NOâ€¢.Eâ€¢OS-'%- .-00 1 W S#-RAW WA TTLk 7?117/Ing:* ...132Â»~ 1 1 A CHAA#VELS To ~ ~ S.....im,KION .r..1 Â·: THAN 3:j ~53~~~~~2~*~*~~~23~2- MITCH #EDIMENT - C.CRETE 'ANK~ul ARD SELT FEICE 23 Â»0 000\ 6 \43 - '1141 f PROT CTIO - 57**ILT C~. h 1 -, A CUReli,mPROTECTioâ€¢ .*1414*Marrtime#$/Er'it 1 Y 1 ~6Â©00&*A'>U -- tA~03*44Â§Â§42*,~fizz:t. r 1... ~49Â»NtÂ«~4323*31\\AVY \\\ 1.,,.2 - m 1 STABILIZED â€¢0 Iâ€¢LE SILT FENCE ./Al SALE, STO,â‚¬ \ FIRM :Ir.. - BAG INLET PROTECTION HO SCALE MAXIMUM CONTRIBUTING DRAINAGE *REA = 1 ACRE CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCE No SCALE 1=2AE~-IRE~l~Ila Of ll.OPES GREATER ! 4 1 , 1 -1 1-=4& 7 \11 \ BAA STABIWZA TION: 4 1 . I .4.' 1, 1 -1 11 ' TH#, 3,/ 1 ..i ' \. 744/3 f+4-H 1-mE=11- !1iilli r 'EE' 1/ ==1=- OR i~ 11111111 ~1' Â·- \M~Ir~TU-I , 1- . _~ply 7- 0 - lilli I! ~4 t_ l -=== -74+392 7 : il l: all./. CHECKED By RBG ~c~or â€¢~th Two .- JOB* 2014Â·17 ....Â·dm mr.Â·aL ---*- 0.1- .to Â·n'..O...d , FLAT HOTTOM TRIRCH SECTION - -27 ~|| JA - 1 ,-./-1 1 1 E.121aII~ltiHIiIal NOTFOR t-- â€¢. ###I#Wmitr k 1 -r-NiPB&*?99 " CONSTRUCTION A=Â£ ..C. --N. 1/- Â·-1 r -MWU~ ~DTH (W) FOR *WAY ENTRANCE. r.,==1 VI . FT ./.lul 'DIH (W) FOR TWO-wAY ..INCE 24 n ' 2,XEEL.LIIAL EROSION CONTROL 6 6 9Nlk:133NION =1 NIhIVON BIVHO AZÂ¥1 L LS Â£289-92 (998 ) 7 DZ#Z-8% 3 'N3dSV N0UdIH0S30 - NOISI/\38 M3UGH 3Nll N33hID 0,09 ... Residential Design Stati~rds Compliance 511 Lazy Chair Road RDS Soctlon Codi Description Compllance D-cripuon Refer,nced Z Sh-* FORUM PHI A Site Design 1. Building orientation. The front facades of all prinapal structures shall be parallel to the street On comer lots, both The subject lot does not have any street facing facades and Is accessed via private drive street-facing facades must be parallel to the intersecting streets On curvilinear streets, the front facade of all structures shall be parallel to the tangent of the mdpoint of the arc of the street ParceIs as outlined in Subsection 26 410 010 8 4 shall be exempt from this requirement One (1) element. such as a bay window or dormer placed at a front corner of the building may be on a diagonal from the teet d desired 1 Build-40 lines. On parcels or lot/ of len than ineen thousand (15 000) square feet. at least sirty percent N/A (60%) of the front fagade shall be within five (5) feet of the minimum front yard setback line 715 West Main Street. Surte 204 On corner stes this standard shall be met on the frontage with the longest block length Aspen. Colorado 81611 Porches may be used to meet the sixty percent (60%) standard P 9702794157 F 866 7705585 3. Fenc=. Fences, hedgerows and planter boxes shall not be rnore than forty-two (42) inches high. N/A measured from natural grade. in @11 areas forward of the frorn facade of the house Man-madie berms *e prohibited in the front yard setback B. Building Form 1. Secondary maÂ®*. All new single-family and duplex structures shall locate at least ten percent (10%) of their total The master suite serves as a secondary mass accounts for 28% of total SF above grade 511 LAZY CHAIR square footage above grade ina mass which is completely detached from the prinapal Verbcal circulation connects the two in form of a stair and an elevator building or linked to It by a subordinate linking element This standard shall only apply to 511 LAZY CHAIR LOT 2 LLC parcels within the Aspen infill area pursuant to Subsection 26 410 010 8 2 Accessory 511 Lazy Chair buildings such as garages. sheds and accessory dwelling units are examples of appropnate uses for the secondary mass A subordinate linking element for the purposes of linking a Aspen, CO 81611 primary and secondary mass shall be at least ten (10) feet in length, not more than ten (10) feet in width, and with a plate he,ght of not more than nine (9) feet. Accessible outdoor space over the linking element (e g a deck) is permitted but may not be covered or enclosed Any rmling for an accessible outdoor space over a linking element must be the minimum reasonably necessary to prov,de adequate safety and building code compiance and the ralling must be 50% or more transparent C Parking. Garag. and 1. For all resldintial uses a) Parking. garages and carports shall be accessed from an alley or private road Prr,ate Road /47 1%\ Carports that have access from an C STEVEN 1 alley or private road, the b) If the garage doors are -ble from a street or alley. then they shall be single-stall doors or Pnvate Road * ~ WILSON following standards shall double-stall doors designed to appear like single-stall doors 402127 "pw 0 c) If the garage doors are not visible from a street or alley. the garage doors may be either Cufrentty Using single doors single-stall or normal double-stall garage doors ~4$/0 Aec,2 2. For *11 -Id,ntial u,es a) On the street facing facade(s). the width of the bving area on the first floor shall beat least N/A that have access only from frve (5) feet greater than the width of the garage or carport I public street. the following standards shall b) The front facade of the garage or the front-most supportlng column of a carport shall be set N/A be apply: back at least ten (10) feet further from the street than the front-most wall of the house CONSULTANTS c) On lots of at least f,Reen thousand (15,000) square feet in size, the garage or carport may N/A SURVEYOR be forward of the front facade of the house only if the garage doors or carport entry are Tuttle Surveying Services perpendicular to the street (side-loaded) 727 Blake Ave d) When the floor of a garage or carport is above or below the street leve|1 the dliveway cut N/A (970)928-9708 within the front yard setback shall not exceed two (2) feet In deMh, measured from natural jeff@tss-us corn grade Glenwood Springs, CO 81901 CIVIL e) The vehicular entrance width of a garage or carport shall not be greaterthan twenty-four N/A Roaring FoR Engineering (24)feet PO Box 9554 f) If the garage doors are visible from a public street or alley, then they shall be single-stall N/A Aspen, CO 81611 (970) 448-7474 doors or double-stall doors des,ned to appear like single-stall doors R,chardG@rfeng.biz 0. Building Elernents 1. Stmetoriented entrance All single-family homeland duplexes except as outlined in Subsection 26 410 010 8.4 shall N/A GEOTECH and principal windcw. have a street-oriented entance and a street facing pnncipal window Mult,-family units shall have at least ore (1) stieet-oriented entrance for ever'y four (4) units and front units must have CTL Thompson a street faang a pnnapal window On corner lots. entnes and principal windows should face whichever street has a greater block length This standard shall be satisfied if all of the follow,ng cond,bons are met a) The entry door shall face the street and be no more than ten (10) feet back from the front- N/A most wall of the building Entry doors shall not be taller than eight (8) feet STRUCTURAL TBD b) A covered entry porch of fifty (50) or more square feet, with a minimum depth of six (6') N/A feet shall be part of the front facade Entry porches and canopies shall not be more than one (1):toryinheight c) A street-facing prinapal window requires that a signincant window or group of windows face N/A street CONTRACTOR Kevin McClure 22 Flint itoryiliment All residential buildings shall have a first story street-facing element the w,dth of which N/A comprises at least twenty percent (20%) of the buildingÂ·s overall w,dth and the depth of which PO Box 6957 is at least six (6) feet from the wall the first story element I projecting from Assuming that the Snowmass Village, CO 81615 first story element includes interior tivIng space, the height of the first story element shall not (970) 379 9088 exceed ten (10) feet as measured to the plate height A first story element may be a porch or KvnMcCIure@gmail.com IMng space Access,ble space (whether X is a deck porch or enclosed area) shall not be allowed over the frst story element, however, accessible space over the rernaining first story 7/114014 DATE OF PWLICATION elements on the front fagade shall not be preduded 3. Windows. a) Street-facing windows shall not span through the area where a second floor level would N/A typically exist which is betneen nine (9) and twelve feet (12) above the finished first floor For interior staircasesi this measurement will be made from the first landing d one emits A transom window above the main entry 1/ exempt from this standard b) No more than one ( 1) non-orthogonal window shall be allowed on each facade of the N/A building A single non-orthogonal window in a gable end may be divided with millions and still be considered one (1) non-orthogonal window The requirement shall only apply to Subaect,on 26410010 B2 2 7/11/14 8040 GREENLINE 4. LIghtwells. All areaways, lightwells and/or :tair-Ils on the shet-facing fic,dls) of a building shall be N/A Z 3/28/14 PIATAMENDMENT entirely recessed behind the front-most wall of the building E. Conti/ 1. Matwials. a) The quality of the exterior materials and detalls and their application shall be consistent on Yes I all sides of the building PROJECT NO 1405 DRAWN BY SMW b) Materials shall billed in ways that are true to their charactenstics For instance stucco Yes which is a light or non.bearing matenal shall not be used below a heavy material, such as stone COPYRIGHT FORUM PHI, LLC c) Highly reflective surfaces shall not be used is exter,or materials. Using stone, wood Iiding, and glazing 1 Innection The following standard must be met for parcels which are six thousand (6.000) square feet or N/A over and as outlined in Subsection 26 410 010 B 2 a) If a one-story building exists directly adjacent to the subject site, then the new construction N/A must step down to Ine.tory in h.ght along their common lot line If there are one-story buildings on both sides of the subject site, the applicant may choose the side toward which to Inflect A one-story building shall be defined as follows A one story building shall mean a structure or N/A SHEETTITLE porbon of a structure. where #lere is only one (1) floor of fully usable living space at least *Ne (12) feet wide across the sWeet frontage This standard shall be met by providing a one story element which is also at least twelve (12) feet wide across the street frontage and one (1) story tall as far back along the common lot line as the adjacent Z1-004 building is one (1) story RDS COMPLIANCE .... .- i - FORUM PHI /. r,\\ ~ f*?FF#J 34#1 -h X \ I i A~!#ja \ ) :..7 P#OPOSED'TREE \ -\ / 1 RELOCATI 0 - \\ r.\ Â§11 LAIÂ¥ @MAIN i /1 c i 511511,34**Â®rdiot 2 1 \ 2 5#LAâ€¢2*01344*R Le311~C \ A,pen, CO 81811 9; \ 1 ~ DEMO EXISTING t - i ~EMO CONCRETE ~ - 14.CF-44\\ 1 PADANDMECH. ' EQUIPMENT , 6.DEMO EXISTING \.\. i CONSÂ¥RUCTiON FENdING ,~ - 1. STEVEN / AT 8060' ELEVATION ~ --4' j 1 ~ENQE A~SEMBLY 1 \ \. 402127 k 1 <5940) \ C 1 1 / .- .') 1 1 1 * ,77 x 4 \ lili \ i -- ~\ av GOLF COURSE 1\ \ t-ok,44<10-~ ~~-i\ ~ DEMO MASONRY SITE WALL ) * EASEMENT~ 1- 1 \ \ - N *2 9/9 ) CONSULTANTS \ 2 / MASONRY*ITE J 727 81@AXIWENUE i \ SURVEYOR TWITIEE,eem*5*126ERVICES -. - WALL # GaWW/0(Â®r@eâ€¢jseal33181601 , 1 -- 14 ~ *3793021RBI8 F 970 947 9007 CIVIL ~ ~ 0/-- POWER POLE .*< ~ Lx < STAIRS TO ~ r'' ~ ~ BAQÂ¢Ms-~IERMTSS-US COM 1 / x ~ REMOVE MECH ~ BE DEMO -7 1 EQUIPMENT ~ ~*0Nf'R'%%1t9NkERING 1\ 1 # 2 Â·i 1 \ ~ \ ;2&2>38Â¥611 -~ 1 1 \,4 j t#(0;1Y i \ F X' I 1 ' ~ i / ~ Â· 9488~*kliG BIZ \ /.1 \ 1/1, --A-----4 7 /1. \ GEOTECH | CTL- Thte*BGON - ' DEMO PATIOSLAB \1 if:. ,/~DEMO ENTIRE~ ~Â£0NGRADE 1 ~ \ ., STRUCTURE 1 1 -1 \ h i : w 12_____J STRUCTURAL Z p*< J ~ DEMO STONE If. DEMO CONCRETE FENCE ALONG 1 - \\ yhADE-C' 1. SITE WALL 1 DEMO STONE PERIMETER PEER ,.aea//68*ke. ' - APPLIED CONCRETEI $ STAR ASSEMBLY TBO 2 dNE Â£ il \ i' I, 1 r-APPLIED CONCRETE IMPROVEMENT~I , 3 \ - Q SURVE 1 ' W .f SITE WALL 1 11 CONTRACTOR DEMO EXTERIOR CONCRETE 1 9 N /// MECHANICAL ROOM I 1 tj~~84~~1615 ~ 7/*2014 ZATE OF PUBUCAn ON -â‚¬~*4%~r DEMO STONE / ~ COM APPLIED CONCRETE SITE WALL 1:11 \''.hy \ CONCRETE 1/31% / 1 I J Ul / F 1 E Â¥\ 41 a / 4. 1 ASPHALT 1 /<l 1 \ FIRE HYDRANT ' â€¢.X I ~ / ' c WATER MAIIÂ© r ; / A J Ul ' 1 CONCRETE DRIVE 8517 SQ FT Z 7/11,14 8040 GREENLINE \ 2 3/28/14 PLATAMENDMENT ' ' / ASPHALT DRIVE 2718,25 SQ FT 1 20'321 1 1 1 i \ ,t \ / . 7'23- 310 FT OF FENCE ASSEMBLYTO BE REMOVED PROJECT NO: 1405 DRAWN BY: SMW 1 \ i 2 1 COPYRIGHT FORUM PHI, LLC / 011 / / 1 SHEETTITLE 22#71/5 DEMO SITE PLAN 1" =20' N r-L-1 1 8 DEMO SITE PLAN 10' 20' 40 80' .... FORUM PHI 1 1 [ A ' 12'.Â·4%01-Â·4 ~ J Aspen, Colorado 81611 715 West Main Street. Suite 204 P 970 279 4157 F 866 770 5585 511 LAZY CHAIR 511 LAZY CHAIR LOT 2 LLC 511 Lazy Chair r Aspen CO 81611 11 \ r /.- , LAR=nt CN~4~ ~~~ ~02101041 ' oF 0, \ ~ UNDISTURBED SLTE AREA f 1\. . /4 3 ~tfi~> 44Â«\6 STEVEN ' * 1 WILSON * / . Â£ 402127 ~A : ./B v I 7% 91----/,e 94* 0 4960 Aact XJ ./ ~,43 \ N\%> 3 1 CONSULTANTS SURVEYOR UPPER LEVEL \ - /~ V. S E WALL 727 Blake Ave Tuttle Surveying Services V' 1 jeff@tss.us com V <~ ~1 ~ PATIO ON GRADE ~ Glerwood Springs CO 81901 (970)928-9708 '1\ 1,\ kupx 1\1 1 4-'ty tutthrÂ·'' " ' ''Â· 1 POWER POLE ->'7 ' CIVIL Roaring Fork Engineering PO Box 9554 Aspen,CO 81611 ~ MAIN LEVEL : | ELEV= 8040 | (970) 448-7474 tA\\ RicherdG@rfeng be 0*VE. cle i \ CTL Thompson GEOTECH /2.: ;it ./0 1, PROPOSED DRIVEWAY t 526 1 + --- GAMBEL OAK L-r-1 ~ 1 STRUCTURAL SITE WALL J f ~ - ~._r__ 1-4 ~ ' * UNDISTURBED SITE ARE~77 1 TBD SITE ALL N.1 1-Ul - ra, 53 1 0 k,% 1 i w f '' 6:3, 1, 1 #55 1 1-1/f l / ~ -- D-- fi // 4 ' CONTRACTOR 4- UNDISTURBEO SITE AREA ;7 .~ (111\ Kevin M.Clure 6 4 PO Box 6957 , Snowmass Village CO 81615 tk (970) 379 9088 KvnMcaure@gmall corn GAMBEL OAK -r-Â«- :N j ' Â»1 7/11~2014 DATE OF PUBLICATION ///,1 , X. 1 .5' ~ 5 IT rd 4 JuA yM# p A lA!; I.rlit .i j fi j j ,:: ti; i{ 1-t. 1 11 .r. / / , 11 4211 41 . 2 7/11/14 , 8040 GREENLINE Z - 3/28/14 PLATAMENDMENT LOWER LEVEL ELEV = 8027' PROJECT NO 1405 DRAWN BY SMW llt'\it/)/lf/.1/.r)il 1 ---- 1 /1 1.lt"lilli '/ +I:j,2 # I ! 4 1~. RELOCATED EVERGREEN COPYRIGHT FORUM PHI LLC / ..*~ -.' // t , .- RELOCATED DECIDUOUS I P /9 .ya rfÂ» ~~ PROPOSED EVERGREEN STORY SETTINGS JPPER LEVEL ELEV = 8052' N " SHEET TITLE VIAIN LEVEL ELEV = 8040' ~ PROPOSED DECIDUOUS OWER LEVEL ELEV = 8026' e Zl-011 SITE PLAN SITE PLAN 1" = 20' .... FORUM PHI LOWER PATIO Â¢Â¢Â¢ 715 West Main Street, Suite 204 KE>1 Aspen, Colorado 81611 PÂ· 9702794157 F 866 770 5585 POOL 1 KEk -*11 511 LAZY CHAIR *Â¢* 511 LAZY CHAIR LOT 2 LLC 511 Lazy Chair A Â¢ 48 dj) * Aspen, CO 81611 / 040Â¢ O MAIN DECK -Â©1 /42Â»\ 47 1% / 9 \ 402127 /6- f STEVEN j 1 [~__1 1__-1 L_-1 * ( WILSON | * 0 71 4 0\ /0 M * 9-6 980 ABO+ 0 4 41 M / / 1~ ' CONSULTANTS 0 / .VA / SURVEYOR / Tuttle Surveying Services 727 Blake Ave Glenwood Springs CO 81901 4/ / MAIN LEVEL Jeff@tss-us com (970)928-9708 1 E CIVIL Roaring Fork Engineering 0 1 PO Box 9554 (970) 448-7474 Aspen, CO 81611 / =331 --1 RichardG@rfeng biz GEOTECH CTL Thompson / 1 / 12 //1 : I _24.-IN I / I. STRUCTURAL 40 joi * 1 / Kevin Mcelure CONTRACTOR 2 PO Box 6957 5 1 - Snowmass Village CO 81615 /* ' KvnMcCIure@gmail corn (970) 379 9088 7/11/2014 DATE OF PUBLICATION LOWER LEVEL -~- UPPER LEVEL - DRIVEWAY UPPER PATIO Z 7/11/14 8040 GREENUNE Z 3/28/14 PLATAMENDMENT PROJECT NO 1405 DRAWN BY. SMW COPYRIGHT FORUM PHI, LLC 4**4Â¢Â¢** SHEET TITLE Zl-012 EXTERIOR FXTFRIOR LIGHTING PI AN 1/8" = 1 LIGHTING 4 -0- . e . . . FORUM PHI MONO LED WW HELI X SCREEN LED WW 622311 4102 6 202 04 22 ..n -" 'I 106401 . 4, ~ ,, 715 West Main Street, Surte 204 Aspen, Colorado 81611 P 970 279 4157 F 866 770 5585 O i,nirr. ./ 0-%.,â€¢ * r 511 LAZY CHAIR - - 511 LAZY CHAIR LOT 2 LL = ./ 22/Â·48:r . 11 Not. .i~.,11'blr - 511 Lazy Chair - ./.b' 0- Alt., 0/ Â¥ .... ' U 2-1.le~~1.1~.7.I ut'CULL-. Aspen, CO 81611 1 - Â«CL ' 42MS i uWIER =JPPL, m,Â¥*OC ...f-.'. W~,UN '3les E DELTALIGHT cl~ss,aR,~,rscri,~ - â€¢a 0-10". //SE-14\ -râ€¢011* ILA' i /Â«-4 \ corÂ£*r E ./,87 LED PÂ¢â€¢4â‚¬* 5u-L Â¥ 36Â£Â»1-Â·OC o~â€¢ y/, 1% - Â· / STEVEN \ * 1 WIL-SON I * HELI X SCREEN LED WW ( 402127 / A- MONO LED WW 4 20. 27 ~4-itf~ 6223114102 A.]h 1./.1.1 H 11".. :Dil A..râ€¢r-, ~~ft*I HUMARDTON FORGE CONSULTANTS SURVEYOR 6- -. I--i-il. L.,tâ€ž..5,. I ~co 8~+~~ ALIGHT NeilÂ·Ameri. E DELTALIGHT ..#-i:I Tuttle Surveying Services HUBBARDTON FORGE - - - 727 Blake Ave 1 I., f~= *i> ...11-*., Glenwood Springs CO 81901 1/'.135Â·*Â· .......i. (970)928-9708 jeff@tls-us com FIXTUREA FIXTUREA FIXTURE B FIXTURE C CIVIL Roaring Fork Engineering PO Box 9554 Aspen,CO 81611 (970) 448-7474 R,chardG@deng biz GEOTECH CTL Thompson AULA 60 WW 63'817 4102 .Ike- Â® DELTALIGHT Specification Â¥y. , 4. 0 Photometric Sheet Data STRUCTURAL USâ€¢ 0.00*1. â€¢,{64077,800 C-~....Cl/â€¢...3/30 TBD Carree Il X Sl Carree Il X Sl .1~Ir... . EW CONTRACTOR -- " PO Box 6957 Kev,n Mcelure .4.....L- -po...m Snowmass Village, CO 81615 . 15./ * A-Â«*- C~EN -O-.W.TE (970) 379 9088 - Use lampdata from .~ ~1~,( ..1 1 i /O-RLE)./TE A., C..0 3000,f i g~â€ž KinMcCIure@gmail com 014, manul.cture, -47 -aLEOPOW. SUP.Â¥360(knâ€¢Â·OC Ill/2014 DATE OF PUBLICATION -'........L.1/- 9 - 'p il ) IN. ,â€¢11. f. --...irrM .' . Ill,1 1 Â«ANE 5 Slt- 3 . 18 W - I-.M-'â„¢,1.L - *.....n UNCTICNBOX A ~ft=- E DELTALIGHT W,401 1 LUS P.Â©1Â«:t=IL-1 I. - 1- - 16 IP~ IC-ECTOR . St"..._ ....1 AULA 60 WW 6318174102 1â‚¬X-~1. ==1. Z 3/28/14 PlATAMENDMENT Z 7/11/14 8040 GREENUNE Optons required for non-class 2 power limited circuits /.thre . Hcumg DRAWN BY SMW 1 PROJECT NO 1405 Â® DELTALIGHT E DELTALIGHT ./ Anieric. 1. / 11 1 Â»,h .Wea US~/d~Il.m/+$*.701~0 u. ...,Â·..' ./-.... COPYRIGHT FORUM PHI LLC C~*/-.'.0618./. FIXTURE D FIXTURE D FIXTURE E SHEETTITLE 41-EQ13 LIGHTING CUTSHEET 6- .- / , FORUM PHI Â£ WALK OUT .~, Â· LOWER LEVEL ELEV=802T 715 West Main Street, Suite 204 P 970 279 4157 F 866 770 5585 Aspen Colorado 81611 u 4 / f -34----- . Mt':144* 511 LAZY CHAIR \ \ 511 LAZY CHA)R LOT 2 LLC 511 Lazy Chair /4 1 Aspen. CO 81611 /1 1 // i / j ,-n /// /j U \ 1 I /1 \ 1\ lf/1.J i /1 ~ STEVEN ~~ /9 //f -J _1 1 Â« 'fil 44 - V - - *1 \,11!SON 1* .0 F7.i~- 3 .ED Pay, \ 402127 / 0\ - = 0 4 1 Â£ CONSULTANTS MAIN LEVEL = </2/ 1 1 44 lit// 727 Blake Ave lit SURVEYOR \ Tuttle Surveying Services il- ELEV=-8049 Giermood Springs CO M %1 (970)928-9708 jeff@Iss-us com CIVIL L Roaring Fork Engineering PO Box 9554 ,/44 Aspen CO 81611 ..... f RichardG@rfeng biz A G A / ///7 (970) 448-7474 GEOTECH \ J L '' CTL Thompson 1 It , 4 / -8035 ~ 4 , >/... la/// 4 - xlft 747UCTURAL 1-1.2 1 - . 99 1 / 0/0// 9- 11.....11 _11 CONTRACTOR UPPER LEVEL - 1 PO Box 6957 Kevin McCIure ELEV= 8051Â·-6Â· ~ , ' ' Snowmass Village. CO 81615 %/ \ 1\6 /0Â«-44 ==Lcom , 7,11/2014 DATE OF PUBICATION '19 / 1 / I I 8050' IL--_. 1 2 2 0 - L It F-- /7/ r, Z 7/11/14 8040 GREENLINE Z 3/28/14 PLATAMENDMENT Ii 1 9 | 1 ~ PROJECT NO 1405 1 DRAWN BY SMW f 600 COPYRIGHT FORUM PHI LLC 8055 i - --40 - - 6/ - C--- - - 6,6 -9/2 - - SHEETTITLE ~~~ k. 1 -~ â‚¬1, / --- -fifift&-11 1 Zl-014 / %0~ - __ __ _ _ _ /8" - PLAN - 1 -U PLAN FORUM PHI ~ r. 1 irt,W.& Ur 'll 1~~ 41 01, 6170-3 ~tr 41.-1 . 1 I t A --1/Zatifilt/*1:-, 44/44 t... . - #le=actit#M~-#Atf , -----'10-- ILY Vi~ . ..1.- lilli - ~9/..:Ilir . A- i/ / / //i/v// / ...â€¢ 1 ' . 7 ... .............*4&#1#1-- I - --- -12-1- ---- â€¢L.I.'61/1.......- .i/~faull.Â®111/11â€¢/â€¢1- â€¢ln..Apt--- . . - 1 .. 1 I -I. - -4.- .. --11,~ ....1 - C --- 4-2:4.6- <I i~ilm.1.~1.11.:Ii. - 1 .1. ~~..1 10=111~ *2/474-479;*e, p.41'.* %.44.-keaae;tvy?;*t MEEMMa-E:mâ€¢Im~ 97#t--3. - 6-11*-- . 11 - 1 .... FORUM PHI 28' SITE OFFSET FROM UPPER LEVEL g-- FACE OF STRUCTURE - 715 West Man Street Suite 204 Aspen Colorado 81611 P 970 279 4157 F 866 770 5585 511 LAZY CHAIR 511 LAZY CHAIR LOT 2 LLC 511 Lazy Chair Aspen. CO 81611 I 1 74 jpÂ»=B/Mi--------f ---------*--% ~- - 1- th---,6 Ir i A l - ~43Â« - f*3 t -i Il L J L- 2~ ~~< STEVEN ~\ 1 Â·* 1 WILSON 1*1 \ 402127 /A 0\ t O\ CONSULTANTS SURVEYOR Tuttle Surveying Services 727 Blake Ave Glenwood Springs CO 81901 (970)928-9708 jeff@tss.us com CIVIL Roaring Fork Engineering PO Box 9554 Aspen, CO 81611 (970) 448-7474 RichardG@rfeng biz GEOTECH CTL Thompson NORTHWEST 3/16" = 1'-0 STRUCTURAL TBD 28' SITE OFFSET FROM UPPER LEVEL- CONTRACTOR FACE OF STRUCTURE Kevin Mcelure PO Box 6957 Snowmass Village. CO 81615 (970) 379 9088 Kvr,Mcature@grnail corn 7/112014 :ATE OF PUBLICATION 1 1 tatÂ«24 1 E-94----- 1 1 1 Z 3/28/14 PLATAMENDMENT 2 7/11/14 8040 GREENLINE -lilli< 11, 1 0 1 1 i PROJECT NO 1405 L 1 1 1 911-1 1 7%39X -11 DRAWN BY. SMW cr:. COPYRIGHT FORUM PHI LLC , 1 1 111 1 1 14 - 1 1 - ~==L ~ SHEETTITLE - - 1---1 Zl-016 ELEVATIONS WEST 3/16" = 1'-0" .. 715 West Main Street. Sufte 204 Aspen Colorado 81611 P 9702794157 F 866 770 5585 511 LAZY CHAIR 511 LAZY CHAIR LOT 2 LLC 511 Lazy Chair Aspen, CO 81611 /47 1-%\ / STEVEN \ * 1 WILSON 1 * \ 402127 1 A 041 /4 1,22-200 CONSULTANTS SURVEYOR Tuttle Surveying Services 727 Blake Ave Glenwood Springs CO 81901 (970)928-9708 jeff@tss-us com CIVIL Roaring Fork Engineering PO Box 9554 Aspen. CO 81611 (970) 448-7474 RichardG@rfeng biz GEOTECH CTL Thompson STRUCTURAL TBD CONTRACTOR Kevin McClure 9 I.-1._1_1 Snowmass Village. C081615 PO Box 6957 -32:M-31/43 1 (970) 379 9088 KinMcaure@gmail corn 7/110014 DATE Of PUBLICATION c -23 ~ ::1 ' ~ ~F-,Â·.~ ]12 â€ž~ Af-lrf- i ke-i 6 -f.-1 r.1 2:02- 530 - 9 ~ O 0" O 0 Eli 0 El Z 7/11/14 8040 GREENLINE 2 3/28/14 PLATAMENDMENT PROJECT NO 1405 DRAWN BY SMW COPYRIGHT FORUM PHI LLC SHEETTITLE Zl-017 -SOUTH -----...............--------------@03IZ--1-0 ELEVATIONS