The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink Aboutcoa.lu.pu.480 Doolittle Dr. 0078.2011.ASLU THE CITY OF ASPEN City of Aspen Community Development Department CASE NUMBER 0078.2011.ASLU PARCEL ID NUMBERS 2735 132 04 024, 2735 132 04 825 PROJECTS ADDRESS 480 DOOLITTLE DRIVE PLANNER AMY SIMON CASE DESCRIPTION WATER TREATMENT PUD REPRESENTATIVE JEFF PENDARVIS DATE OF FINAL ACTION 4.4.12 DATE OF FINAL REFUND/ 12.31.14 PAYMENT CLOSED BY ANGELA SCOREY ON: 1.13.15 f 2,0 A5 LAA File Edit Record Navigate Form Reports Format Tab Help IX 1 GHJ- � �i• , �a J vA ]ump 1 /� cRouting Status Fees Fee Summary I' ain I Actions 'Attachments'Routing History Valuation j ArchjEng Custom Fields Sub Permits 1 1 Permit tyslu - Aspen Land Use Permit# 0078.2011.ASLU M Vi Address 480 DOOLITTLE DR AptjSuite o City ASPEN State CO Zip 81611 Q ° Permit Information s Routing queue aslu07 Applied Master permit 1 211 5 2011 n z Project Status pending Approved 0 G Description APPLICATION FOR CHEMICAL TREATMENT BUILDING REMODEL ASPEN WATER Issued PLACE PUD-REFERRAL DEPTS ARE:HOUSING&ENGINEERING, Closed�Final Submitted JEFF PANDARVIS Clock Running DaysF7 Expires 12,9f?012 Submitted via M Owner Last name CITY OF ASPEN WATER DE First name 500 DOOLITTLE DR M ASPEN CO 81611 Phone (970)920-5110 Address Applicant Q Owner is applicant? Contractor is applicant? Last name CITY OF ASPEN WA!E DE First name 1 500 DOOLITTLE DR Phone (970)920-5110 1 Cust# 25227 Address ASPEN CO 81611 Lender Last name First name Phone ( Address Q U Displays the permit lender's address AspenGold5(server) angelas _ 1 of 1 1a.r,n�ns, tb ,o go•oo �o Fees �, q 20 •©o 1 , 5-7 • o C' — A{c `k Sas'•g4 94•��3•$�00� 2�S• 0 C) r RESOLUTION No. 11 (SERIES OF 2012) A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF ASPEN, APPROVING AN AMENDMENT TO SPECIALLY PLANNED AREA, GROWTH MANAGEMENT REVIEW, CHANGE IN USE REVIEW, 8040 GREENLINE REVIEW, AND RESIDENTIAL DESIGN VARIANCES FOR THE PROPERTY LOCATED AT 480 DOOLITTLE DR, AKA THE WATER PLACE AFFORDABLE HOUSING SPA, CITY AND TOWNSITE OF ASPEN Parcel Identification Number: 2735-132-04-024,2735-132-04-825 WHEREAS, the City of Aspen has submitted a request for Speci'ally Planned. Area (SPA) Amendment, Growth Management Review, Change in Use Review, 8040 Greenline Review, and Residential Design Variances to the Planning and Zoning Commission; and WHEREAS, the property is located in the Public (PUB) zone district with SPA Overlay; and WHEREAS, the Specially Planned Area approval for the Property was originally approved by the Aspen City Council via Ordinance No. 23 Series of 1996; and WHEREAS, upon initial review of the application and.the applicable code standards, the Community Development Department recommended approval of the SPA Amendment, Growth Management Review, Change in Use Review, 8040 Greenline Review, and Residential Design Variances; and, WHEREAS, during a regular meeting on May 15, 2012, the Planning and Zoning Commission opened a duly noticed public hearing to consider the project; and WHEREAS, the Aspen Planning and Zoning Commission has reviewed and considered the development proposal under the applicable provisions of the Municipal Code as identified herein; and, WHEREAS, the Aspen Planning and Zoning Commission finds that the development proposal meets all applicable development standards and ihat.the approval of the development proposal, with conditions, is consistent with the goals and elements of the Aspen Area Community Plan; and, WHEREAS, the Aspen Planning and Zoning Commission finds that this resolution furthers and is necessary for the promotion of public health, safety, and welfare. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY OF ASPEN PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION AS FOLLOWS: Section 1: SPA Amendment The SPA is hereby amended to allow the change in use from an essential public facility to a for- sale deed-restricted affordable housing unit. Section 2: Growth Management Review The Growth Management Review has been satisfied to deed restrict this unit as a studio in accordance with the existing Water Plant Affordable Housing SPA. Deed restriction shall be recorded prior to granting a Certificate of Occupancy. Section 3: Change in Use Review The Change in Use Review has been satisfied and the changing of ail essential public facility to a for-sale deed-restricted affordable housing unit has been found to be an appropriate use of this. property. Section 4: 8040 Greenline Review The 8040 Greenline Review has been completed and found to meet the criteria for an 8040 Greenline exemption. See Exhibit A for the approved site plan. Section 5: Residential Design Standards Variances Pursuant to the procedures'and standards set forth in Title 26 of the Aspen Municipal Code, the Planning and Zoning Commission hereby approves variances for Residential Design Standards listed in Section 26.410.040 D, Building Elements, (1) (a), (c) and (3) (a) for single family residences as represented in the application. Section 6: Engineering The Applicant's design shall be compliant with all sections of the City of Aspen Municipal Code, Title 21, Title 28 and all construction and excavation standards published by the Engineering Department. A construction management plan must be submitted in conjunction with the building permit application. A completed drainage report/plan as outlined in the Urban Runoff Management Plan shall be submitted and approved prior to Building Permit issuance. This major project is subject to the fee in lieu requirement of Section 2.12.140 of the Aspen Municipal Code. Section 7: Exterior Lighting All exterior lighting shall meet the requirements of the City's Outdoor Lighting Code pursuant to Land Use Code Section 26.575.150, Outdoor Lighting. Section 8: School Lands Dedication Before the Applicant is issued a Building Permit, the Applicant shall pay a fee-in-lieu of land dedication pursuant to Chapter 26.620, School Lands Dedication. The amount of the fee shall be calculated by the Community Development Department using the calculation method and fee schedule in effect at the time the applicant submits a Building Permit. 2 Section 9: Impact Fees Before the Applicant is issued a Building Permit, the Applicant shall pay a Parks Development fee and a TDM/Air Quality fee pursuant to Chapter 26.610, Impact Fees. The amount of the fees shall be calculated by the Community Development Department using the calculation method and fee schedule in effect at the time the Applicant submits a Building Permit. Section 10: All material representations and commitments made by the Applicant pursuant to the development proposal approvals as herein awarded, whether in public hearing or documentation presented before the Planning and Zoning Commission, are hereby incorporated in such plan development approvals and the same shall be complied with as if fully set forth herein, unless amended by an authorized entity. Section 11: Vested Riljhts The development approvals granted herein shall constitute a site-specific development plan and a vested property right attaching to and running with the Subject Property and shall confer upon the Applicant the right to undertake and complete the site specific development plan and use of said property under the terms and conditions of the site specific development plan. including any approved amendments thereto. The vesting period of these vested property rights shall be for three (3) years which shall not begin to run until the date of the publications required to be made as set forth below. However, any failure to abide by any of the terms and conditions attendant to this approval shall result in the forfeiture of said vested property rights. Unless otherwise exempted or extended, failure to properly record all plats and agreements required to be recorded, as specified herein, within 180 days of the effective date of the development order shall also result in the forfeiture of said vested property rights and shall render the development order void within the meaning of Section 26.104.050, Void Permits. Zoning that is not part of the approved site- specific development plan shall not result in the creation of a vested property right. No later than fourteen (14) days following final approval of this Resolution, the City Clerk shall cause to be published in a newspaper of general circulation within the jurisdictional boundaries of the City of Aspen, a notice advising the general public of the approval of a site specific development plan and creation of a vested property right pursuant to Chapter 26.308, Vested Property Rights. Pursuant to Section 26.304.070(A), Development Orders, such notice shall be substantially in the following form: Notice is hereby given to the general public of the approval of a site specific development plan, and the creation of a vested property right, valid for a period of three (3) years, pursuant to the Land Use Code of the'City of Aspen and Title 24, Article 68, Colorado Revised Statutes, pertaining to the following described property: 233 East Cooper Avenue, Monarch on the Park Condominiums Unit P-3, City and Townsite of Aspen, Colorado. The-vested rights granted hereby shall be subject to all rights of referendum and judicial review. The period of time permitted by law to exercise the right of referendum to refer to the electorate this Section of this Ordinance granting vested rights; or, to seek judicial review of the grant of 3 i vested rights shall not begin to run until the date of publication of the notice of final development approval as set forth above. The rights of referendum described herein shall be no greater than those set forth in the Colorado Constitution and the Aspen Home Rule Charter. Section 12: This resolution shall not affect any existing litigation and shall not operate as an abatement of any action or proceeding now pending under or by virtue of the ordinances repealed or amended as herein provided, and the same shall be conducted and concluded under such prior ordinances. Section 13: If any section, subsection, sentence, clause, phrase, or portion of this resolution is for any reason held invalid or unconstitutional in a court of competent jurisdiction, such portion shall be deemed a separate, distinct and independent provision and shall not affect the validity of the remaining portions thereof. APPROVED BY the Planning and Zoning Commission of the City of Aspen on this 18`" day of May, 2012. au,,,au APP VED AS TO FORM:- � ,��y �- Ck4g�Ir— Deb,Quinn,Assistant City Attorney ATTEST: Fie Lothian,Deputy City Clerk Exhibit A: Site.plan 4 ARCHfi ECTS LA C"1-'l' rg •�f/`�y =� �•P• I '^„'"'�% 'K-i OAFTERALU pp E I l 76 LOU CO i LLJ LU �. �' I s Site Plan i - z DEVELOPMENT ORDER of the City of Aspen Community Development Department This Development Order, hereinafter "Order", is hereby issued pursuant to Section 26.304.070, "Development Orders", and Section 26.308.010, "Vested Property Rights", of the City of Aspen Municipal Code. This Order allows development of a site specific development plan pursuant to the provisions of the land use approvals, described herein. The effective date of this Order shall also be the initiation date of a three-year vested property right. The vested property right shall expire on the day after the third anniversary of the effective date of this Order, unless a building permit is approved pursuant to Section 26.304.075, or unless an exemption, extension, reinstatement, or a revocation is issued by City Council pursuant to Section 26.308.010. After Expiration of vested property rights, this Order shall remain in full force and effect, excluding any growth management allotments granted pursuant to Section 26.470, but shall be subject to any amendments to the Land Use Code adopted since the effective date of this Order. This Development Order is associated with the property noted below for. the site specific development plan as described below. City of Aspen Represented by Jeff Pendarvis Property Asset Manger, City Hall 130 S. Galena St, Aspen CO 81611 970-920-5085 Property Owner's Name, Mailing Address and telephone number Lot 25 Water Plant Affordable Housing, commonly known as 480 Doolittle Dr, Aspen, CO 81611 Legal Description and Street Address of Subject Property The Applicant received approval to change the use of an existing essential public facility, an emergency response facility, to a 508.1 sf deed-restricted affordable housing studio, with the addition of a 70 sf front entryway and a 22'x11' carport w/44sf storage space. Written Description of the Site Specific Plan and/or Attachment Describing Plan SPA Amendment Growth Management Review Change in Use Review, 8040 Greenline Review, and Residential Design Standards Variances May 24 2012 Land Use Approval(s) Received and Dates (Attach Final Ordinances or Resolutions) May 24 2012 Effective Date of Development Order (Same as date of publication of notice of approval.) May 24 2015 Expiration Date of Development Order (The extension, reinstatement, exemption from expiration and revocation may be pursued in accordance with Section 26.308.010 of the City of Aspen. Municipal Code.) Issued Ais 24th day of May, 2012, by the City of Aspen Community Development Director. Chris Bendon, Community Development Director Page 1 of 1 AFFIDAVIT OF PUBLIC NOTICE REQUIRED BY SECTION 26.304.070 AND CHAPTER 26.306 ASPEN LAND USE CODE ADDRESS OF PROPERTY: Aspen, CO STATE OF COLORADO ) ss. County of Pitkin ) 1, (name, please print) being or repres nting an Applicant to the City of Aspen, Colorado,hereby personally certify that I have complied with the public notice requirements of Section 26.304.060 (E) or Section 26.306.010 (E) of the Aspen Land Use Code in the following manner: Publication of notice: By the publication in the legal notice section of an official paper or a paper of general circulation in the City of Aspen at least fourteen(14) days after final approval of a site specific development plan. A copy of the publication is attached hereto. Publication of notice: By the publication in the legal notice section of an official Paper or a paper of general circulation in the City of Aspen no later than fifteen (15) days after an Interpretation has been rendered. A copy of the publication is attached hereto. Signature The foregoing "Affidavit of Notice" was acknowledged before me thi4 day of&LAJ 20L, by A-^.Ad c4 SGo4e✓1 WITNESS MY HAND AND OFFICIAL SEAL N 4iCe is he ebELO MENTAppRDVAL I My commission expires: approval of a site specif cttle 9eloeral Public of theIF I the creation of a vested , the Land Use Property pment plan,and 24,Article 688, of the Cit ght Pursuant to Pertainin Colerad0 RY Of.AePUen and Title 25 W g to the following described Statutes, ater Plant Affordable Hous- Property:Lot tary Public commonly known as 480 Doolittlegbard more Colorado,816 Zoning Commisslo�order of the Planninspen, - - APPlicanLreceived The .0�►•/�%'�, on May 75 2072 g and r Amendment, Growth aPproval for Change in Use,8040 Greenllnegement Review, ••.�/• dentia)Design Standards V Review, 't f.•' '•. vacant emer ariances to and Resi- ATTACHMENTS: restricted gencyy response f cdnvert a exterior studioaffordable acility to a deed- Sara additions. For f housing unit with COPY OF THE PUBLICATIONw1 NadOln City information minor O'M,A,v O) Develo t at the City of As contact Color to .(g7p� 927390 S. pen Communit - i Galena St, i Aspen, ��• � Published in the As s/ClTy of Aspep' C 2012.-[7932334] pen Times Weekly on May 24, qrf OF Civ MEMORANDUM TO: Sara Nadolny FROM: Cindy Christensen,APCHA Operations Manager DATE: May 2, 2012 RE: CHEMICAL TREATMENT BUILDING REMODEL Parcel ID No. ISSUE: The applicant is requesting to remodel a structure into a deed-restricted affordable housing unit. BACKGROUND: The structure was used for chlorine disaster preparedness. At no name were harmful chemicals get in the structure. The structure has been unused for years and the remodel would provide needed employee housing. The cost of the remodel is to be from the fund that is supported by the City departments and not from the 150 affordable housing development fund that is provided with taxpayer money. The City plans to utilize the remodeled structure for a City employee similar to the Water Place housing project. Although the application is proposing the unit be a Category 3 or Category 4 ownership unit, it has been the City's objective to provide housing for any City employee. The unit is proposed at 572 square feet, which is a Category 1 or 2 for a one-bedroom unit stated in the Guidelines. Water Place housing does not specify categories for any of the 22 available units. The category is based on the employee purchasing the unit. RECOMMENDATION: Due to the fact that one-bedroom units are the most sought-after type of unit, based on the location of the proposed affordable housing unit, and in conjunction with the funding of the remodel through the City of Aspen employee fund, APCHA staff is recommending approval of the remodel, as it provides an additional affordable housing unit into the program. The deed restriction should be similar to the Water Place housing project. 1 Date: May 9, 2012 Project: Doolittle Affordable Housing City of Aspen Engineering Department DRC Comments. These comments are not intended to be exclusive, but an initial response to the project packet submitted for purpose of the DRC meeting. General A compliant and accurate survey, must be submitted. We are unable to determine (among other things) utility easements and access easements needed for the site. Drainage: General note: The design for the site must meet the Urban Runoff Management Plan Requirements. Staff was not able to determine whether or not the site will-meet these requirements. A full review will be completed when there is enough information to review. A compliant drainage plan must be submitted prior to final plat. Staff was unable to determine whether or not the site is able to meet the Drainage Principals: 1.C6nsider stormwater quality needs early in the design process 2.Use the entire site when planning for stormwater quality treatment. 3.Avoid unnecessary impervious area. 4.Reduce runoff rates and volumes to more closely match natural conditions. 5.Integrate stormwater quality management and flood control. 6.Develop stormwater quality facilities that enhance the site, the community, and the environment. 7.Use a treatment train approach. 8.Design sustainable facilities that can be safely maintained. 9. Design and maintain facilities with public safety in mind. Construction Management—A construction management plan must be submitted in conjunction with the building permit application. The plan must include a planned sequence of construction that minimizes construction impacts to the public. The plan shall describe mitigation for: parking, staging/encroachments, truck traffic, noise, dust, and erosion/sediment pollution. Fee in Lieu—This pr*t is considered a Major project and is®ject to the Fee in Lieu please refer to Section 2.12.140 of the Municipal Code. Memorandum Date: April 30, 2012 To: Sara Nadolny From; Brian Flynn, Parks Department Re: DRC comments for 500 Doolittle Drive Housing ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ required for the removal o n tree or h Per City Code 13.20 an approved tree permit is q a� excavation under the drip line of the tree. Parks is requiring that the tree permit be approved prior'to approval of building permits. Mitigation for removals will be paid cash in lieu or on site per City Code 13.20. A vegetation protection fence shall be erected at the drip line of each individual tree or groupings of trees remaining on site and their represented drip lines.A formal plan indicating the location of the tree protection will be required for the bldg permit-set No excavation, storage of materials,storage of construction backfill,storage of equipment;foot or vehicle traffic allowed within the drip line of any tree remaining on site.This fence must be inspected by the city forester or his/her designee (920-5120) before any construction activities are to commence. As referenced in Chapter 13.20 THE QTY of ASPEN April 27,2012 . WATER DEPARTMENT To whom it may concern; The property located at.480 Doolittle Drive,what the Water department has referred to as the Emergency Response Center(BRC)since it's construction,has'never housed,stored,filled,spilled,cleaned up,remediated, nor decontaminated anything having to do with any Hazardous Chemicals what so ever. i have personally managed this facility since its construction and it was staffed as a training,staging area for emergency responders only. Please contact me if I may be further assistance. Charles O. Bailey Treatment Supervisor City of Aspen Water Dept. 130 South Galena St. Aspen, CO 81611 -970-920-5110 chuckb@ai.aspen,co.us 130 SOUM GALENA STREET Am,Cuomo 81611-1975 • PHONE 970.920.5110 FAx 970.920.5117 • rMia�,R�rar,PY P1 MEMORANDUM TO: Aspen Planning and Zoning Commission THRU: Jennifer Phelan, Community Development Deputy Director FROM: Sara Nadolny, Planner Technician RE: Water Place Affordable Housing Project, 480 Doolittle Dr- SPA Amendment, Growth Management Review, Change in Use Review, 8040 Greenline Review, and Residential Design Standards Variances MEETING DATE: May 15,2012 APPLICANT/OWNER: City of Aspen STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff Recommends the Planning and Zoning Commission approve REPRESENTATIVE: Jeff Pendarvis, City the SPA amendment. Asset Management LOCATION: Water Place Housing,480 `^ Doolittle Dr. ` IWO 1 — r 1 i +ice y n:4 CURRENT ZONING&USE: Public SUMMARY: The applicant requests of the (PUB) zone district with a Specially Planning and Zoning Commission approval to Planned Area (SPA) overlay. This amend the Aspen Water Place Treatment Plant building is currently vacant; however, it and Affordable Housing SPA to change the use has served as an emergency response of a vacant emergency response facility to an facility for the Water Treatment Plant in affordable housing unit. This request will require the past and is considered to be an an SPA Amendment, Growth Management Essential Public Facility review, Change in Use review, 8040 Greenline review, and variances of existing Residential PROPOSED LAND USE: The applicant Design Standards. requests approval to change the use of the building to a for-sale deed restricted housing unit. P2 i LAND USE REQUESTS AND REVIEW PROCEDURES: The Applicant is requesting four (4) land use approvals requiring a review by the Planning and Zoning Commission(P&Z). • SPA Amendment pursuant to Land Use Code Section 26.440.090, the P&Z shall issue a decision to grant or deny the change in use that is being requested by this application. • Growth Management Review pursuant to Land Use Code Section 26.470.070 (4), the P&Z shall issue a decision regarding the approval to develop a deed-restricted affordable housing unit at this site. • Change in Use Review pursuant to Land Use Code Section 26.470.070 (2), the P&Z shall issue a decision regarding the approval to change the use of an Essential Public Facility to a deed-restricted affordable housing unit at this site. • 8040 Greenline Review pursuant to Land Use Code Section 26.435.030 (C), the P&Z shall issue a decision regarding the impact of any new development (carport, exterior storage space, covered front entry). • Residential Design Standards Variance pursuant to Land Use Code Section 26.410.040 (A)(1) and (D)(1)(a, b, & c), the P&Z shall approve, conditionally approve, or deny the request for residential design variances, which include building street orientation, primary window facing street, and a covered entry porch as part of the front fagade. BACKGROUND: 480 Doolittle Drive is part of the larger Aspen Water Treatment Plant and Affordable Housing Project at 500 Doolittle Dr. The property's underlying zone district designation is Public with an SPA overlay. The SPA was created via City Council Ordinance No. 18, Series of 2009. 480 Doolittle Dr. was historically used as an emergency response center for the water treatment plant. All equipment stored in the building was non-chemical in nature. Due to changes in technology, the emergency response center is no longer necessary to the operation of the water treatment plant, and therefore the building is current vacant and unused. PROJECT SUMMARY: The Applicant is proposing a change in use to 480 Doolittle Dr, from its current unused state to a deed-restricted for-sale affordable housing unit. The one-story unit is proposed to be 572 square foot in size, with 508.1 square feet of net livable space. The unit's exterior will largely remain unchanged, save for the following. The applicant proposes a 70 square foot covered entry to the building's front face, and a carport to the immediate east that will contain a 44 square foot storage closet. Due to its location 480 Doolittle Drive is subject to the heightened level of review associated with the 8040 Greenline. Although the development has previously undergone this review when first constructed as part of the Water Place Affordable Housing SPA, the additional structure being proposed causes this review to be revisited. STAFF COMMENTS: SPA Amendment The building that is proposed for a change in use exists within the Water Place Affordable Housing SPA, and therefore must undergo review to change the Final Development Plan. The purpose of this review is to determine whether the proposed changes are consistent with the final development plan. 2 P3 Staff Comment: The building is pre-existing, and there are minor plans for development on the site (a carport with outdoor storage unit and covered front entry): The proposed use for-the building is compatible with the mix of development in the vicinity, the majority of which is affordable housing units._ No new roads or infrastructure is necessary for the change in use of this building, and it in no way will impact the area's open space, trails, view planes, or surrounding environment. The parcel is stable and there will be no, need to stabilize or re de. Sta f feels this proposal meets the requirements of SPA Amendment review, and recommends a change to the Water place Affordable Housing SPA. Growth Management The proposal is to turn,an existing underutilized building into anaffordable housing unit. The applicant is proposing it as a Category 3 or 4,deed-restricted housing unit. The purpose of this Authority tic�ideirnes. f4 ?. r P ,> p � Count Housing review is to ensure the ro osal is in com liance with the As en/Pitkin Coun .< . Staff Comment: The applicant is proposing to deed-restrict the for-sale unit at a Category 3 or.4 level. According to APCI�4 guidelines, a Category 3 or 4 one-bedroom unit should contain a minimum net livable area,,of 700 square feet. APCHA does allow for a twenty percent reduction in net livable area,provided certain conditions are met These include: 8 Additional storage outside the unit; o Additional window for natural light; o Eff tient and flexible layout; o Site amenities; m Location within the project; and O Achievement of higher density deed-restricted units with variance. The application does meet each of these conditions with the following: o The applicant is proposing to - an additional 44 sf of storage space within the outdoor carport; Additional windows willbe added for enhanced natural light and southern exposure,-- v xposure,o The interior-layout is efficient, without hallways and staircases; o The site is located adjacent to a neighborhood park, the WaitelRobinson Park, Water Place trail system, and Twin Ridge Open Space; m The project is single-story ground level unit; and o A higher density of deed-restricted units will be achieved with this project. However, even with a twenty percent reduction the applicant is below the minimum net livable area for a Category 3 or 4 one-bedroom unit. The minimum net livable area far a Category 3 or 4 deslgnatlon Is 700 sf which may be reduced to AGO sf by taking the 20% reduction as stated aXove, The net livable area for this unit is 508.1 sf however--,, the minimum net livable area for - a Category 3r4 studio unit is 500 sf, which this application meets. Categorizing this unit as a studio rather- than a one-bedroom unit will decrease the allowable for-sale price, however, this designation more accurately,fits the square footage of the unit., Staff recommends approval of the Growth Management Review, with the condition that the unit be deed-restricted us a studio for-sale unit at Category 4 or lower, P4 Change in Use The proposal involves a change in use of an essential public facility to a for-sale one-bedroom deed-restricted residential housing unit. The purpose of this review is to ensure the proposed change in use is appropriate. Staff Response: The essential public facility is currently unused and vacant. The addition of one- bedroom deed restricted unit to the AspenlPitkin County Affordable Housing stock is desirable, and approved by the Housing Department. Staff finds the proposed Change in Use to be an appropriate use of this building. 8040 Greenline Review The proposal involves a building that is located above the 8040 Greenline. The purpose of this review is to ensure reduced impacts on the natural watershed and surface runoff, minimize air pollution, reduce the potential for avalanche, unstable slope, rockfall and mudslide, aid in the transition of agricultural and forestry land uses to urban uses, and ensure the availability of utilities and access to development that exists.above 8040 feet mean sea level. Staff Comment: This building is largely pre-existing and has previously undergone this heightened level of review upon the initial development of the Water Place Affordable Housing SPA. The changes that are proposed include a 70 sf covered front entryway and a carport with a 44 sf storage closet. These additions will not require additional excavation of land, regrading, or stabilization. The change in use will have no significant adverse affects on air quality and no new roads or utilities will be required to service this unit. The structure is smaller in bulk and height as compared to adjacent buildings. It is located adjacent to a park, trail system, and open space. Stafffeels this proposal meets the requirements for an 8040 Greenline Review. Residential Design Standards Variances The applicant is requesting several Residential Design Standards variances with regard to building orientation and street facing windows, as noted in Exhibit D. The purpose of this review is to ensure the preservation of established neighborhood scale and character and to ensure street and neighborhood walkability. Staff Comment: The building is pre-existing is proposed as an affordable housing unit. The variances that are requested deal primarily with the building's orientation. The front of the building is not street facing, which also affects the ability to have a street facing window standard. These standards will be met with having a primary window and front covered entry way,just not to the letter of the Code. The issue is to allow these standards to be met with a non- street facing orientation. Due to the efforts of the applicant to use an existing building and to minimize any new development, as well as the intent to change the use to affordable housing, Staff supports the recommendation for the granting of residential design variances. REFERRALS: Staff solicited the opinions of several City departments regarding this project, including the Aspen/Pitkin County Housing Authority (APCHA), Engineering, Water Treatment, and Parks. Following is a summary of the comments received from these departments. 4 P5 o Water Treatment— o The Emergency Response Center- has never housed, stored, filled, spilled, cleanup, remediated or decontaminated anything having to do with hazardous chemicals. o The building was staff as a training/staging area for emergency responders. o Engineering o The design for the site must meet the Urban Runoff Management Plan requirements, and a compliant drainage plan must be submitted prior to final plat. o A construction management plan must be submitted in conjunction with the building permit application. o This major project is subject to the Fee in Lieu per Sec. 2.12.140 of the Municipal Code. / ® APCHA— o The remodel!would provide needed employee housing. o Although the size of this unit would typically fall into a Category 1 or 2, Water Place housing does not specify categories for any o f its 22 available units; o The affordable housing category will be determined based on the City employee purchasing the unit. o ARCHA is recommending approval of this project with deed-restriction similar to the Water Place housing project. o Parks o Any tree removal will require a tree permit to be approved prior to the approval of building permits. Mitigation for removal will be in accordance with Municipal Code 13.20. o A vegetation protection fence must be erected at the drip line of. each tree remaining on the site, which will be inspected by the City forester or his designee prior, to any construction, o A formal plan indicating_ the�location of tree protection is required for the building permit set. RECOMMENDATION: In reviewing the proposal, Staff believes that the project is consistent-with the applicable review standards in the City Land Use Code. Staff recommends,approval of the project. RECOMMENDED MOTION(ALL MOTIONS ARE WORDED IN THE AFFIRMATIVE): "I move to approve Resolution No.�, Series of 2012, approving SPA Amendment, Growth Management Review, 8040 Greenline Review, Change in Use, and Residential Design Variances for Building Orientation and Street Facing Principal 'Windows." ATTACHMENTS: Exhibit A—SPA Amendment Review Criteria Exhibit B-Growth Management Review Criteria Exhibit C-Change in Use review Craters ' Exhibit D 8040 Greenline Exemption Review Criteria Exhibit E—Residential Design Variance Review Criteria Exhibit F—Application Exhibit G—DRC Comments 5 P6 RESOLUTION'No. (SERIES OF 2012) A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF ASPEN,APPROVING AN AMENDMENT TO SPECIALLY PLANNED AREA, GROWTH MANAGEMENT REVIEW,CHANGE IN USE REVIEW,8040 GREENLINE REVIEW, AND RESIDENTIAL DESIGN VARIANCES FOR THE PROPERTY LOCATED AT 480 DOOLITTLE DR, AKA THE WATER PLACE AFFORDABLE HOUSING SPA, CITY AND TOWNSITE OF ASPEN 4 Parcel Identification Number: 2735-132-04-024,2735-132-04-825 WHEREAS, the City of Aspen has submitted a request -for Specially Planned Area (SPA) Amendment, Growth Management Review, Change in Use Review, 8040 Greenline Review, and Residential Design Variances to the Planning and Zoning Commission; and WHEREAS, the property is located in the Public (PUB) zone district with SPA Overlay; and WHEREAS, the Specially Planned Area approval for the Property was originally approved by the Aspen City Council via Ordinance No. 23 Series of 1996;and WHEREAS, upon initial review of the application and the applicable code standards, the Community Development Department recommended approval of the SPA Amendment, Growth Management Review, Change in Use Review, 8040 Greenline Review, and Residential Design Variances; and, WHEREAS, during a regular meeting on May 15, 2012, the Planning and Zoning Commission opened a duly noticed public hearing to consider the project; and WHEREAS, the Aspen Planning and Zoning Commission has reviewed and considered the development proposal under the appl.icable provisions of the Municipal Code as identified herein; and, WHEREAS, the Aspen Planning and Zoning Commission finds that the development proposal meets all applicable development standards and that the approval of the development proposal, with conditions, is consistent with the goals and elements of the Aspen Area Community Plan; and, WHEREAS, the Aspen Planning and Zoning Commission finds that this resolution furthers and is necessary for the promotion of public health, safety, and welfare. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY OF ASPEN PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION AS FOLLOWS: 1 P7 NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY OF ASPEN PLANNING AND z6NING 4::4?MMISSI0N A$P()ILL®WS;. Section 1: SPA Amendment The SPA is hereby amended to allow the change in use from an essential public facility to a for- sale deed-restrieted affordable housing unit. Section 2: Growth Management Review The Growth Management Review has been satisfied to deed restrict this unit at a studio Category 4 or lower affordable housing unit in compliance with the Aspen/Pitkin County Housing Authority standards. Deed restriction shall be recoiled prior to granting aCertificate of Occupancy. Section 3: Chane in Use Review The Change in Use Review has been satisfied and the changing of an essential public facility to a for-sale deed restricted affordable housing unit has been found to,be an appropriate use of this proper--ty. Section 4: 8040 Greenline Review The 8040 Greenline Review has been completed and found to meet the criteria for an 8040 Greenline exemption. See Exhibit A for the approved site plan., Section 5: Residential Design Standards Variances ,Pursuant to the procedures and standards set forth in Title 26 of the Aspen Municipal Code, the Planning and Zoning Commission hereby approves variances for Residential Design Standards listed in Section 26.410.040 D, Building Elements, (1) (a), (c) and(3) (a) for single family residences as represented in the applicationl. Section 6: Engineering The Applicant's design shall be compliant with all sections of the City of Aspen Municipal Code, Title 21, Title 28 and all construction and excavation standards published by the Engineering Department. A construction management plan must be submitted in conjunction with the building permit application. A completed drainage report/plan as outlined in the Urban Runoff Management Plan shall be submitted and approved prior to Building Permit issuance. This major project is subject to the fee in lieu requirement of Section 2.12.14Q of the Aspen Municipal Code. Section 7.:.Exterior Lighting All exterior lighting shall,meet the requirements of the City's Outdoor Lighting Code pursuant to Land Use Code Section 26.573._15.0, Oytaoor Lighting. , Section 8: School Lands Dedication Before`filie Applicant is issued a Building Permit, the Applicant shall pay afee-in-lieu of land dedication pursuant to Chapter 26.620, School Lands Dedication. The amount of the fee shall be 2 P8 Section 9: Impact Fees Before the Applicant is, issued a Building Permit, the Applicant shall pay a Parks Development fee and a TDM/Air Quality fee pursuant to Chapter 26.610, Impact Fees. The amount of the fees shall be calculated by the Community Development Department using the calculation method and fee schedule in effect at the time the Applicant submits a Building Permit. Section 10: All material representations and commitments made by the Applicant pursuant to the development proposal approvals as herein awarded, whether in public hearing or documentation presented before the Planning and Zoning Commission, are hereby incorporated in such plan development approvals and the same shall be complied with as if fully set forth herein, unless amended by an authorized entity. Section 11: Vested Rights The development approvals granted herein shall constitute a site-specific development plan and a vested property right attaching to and running with the Subject Property and shall confer upon the Applicant the right to undertake and complete the site specific development plan and use of said property under the terms and conditions of the site specific development plan including any approved amendments thereto. The vesting period of these vested property rights shall be for three (3) years which shall not begin to run until the date of the publications required to be made as set forth below. However, any failure to abide by any of the terms and conditions attendant to this approval shall result in the forfeiture of said vested property rights. Unless otherwise exempted or extended, failure to properly record all plats and agreements'required to be recorded, as specified herein, within 180 days of the effective date of the development order shall also result in the forfeiture of said vested property rights and shall render the development order void within the meaning of.Section 26.104.050, Void Permits. Zoning that is not part of the approved site- specific development plan shall not result in the creation of a vested property right. No later than fourteen (14) days following final approval of this Resolution, the City Clerk shall cause to be published in a newspaper of general circulation within the jurisdictional boundaries of the City of Aspen, a notice advising the general public of the approval of a site specific development plan and creation of a vested property right pursuant to Chapter 26.308, Vested Property Rights. Pursuant to Section 26.304.070(A), Development Orders, such notice shall be substantially in the following form: Notice is hereby given to the general public of the approval of a site specific development plan, and the creation of a vested property right, valid for a period of three (3) years, pursuant to the Land Use Code of the City of Aspen and Title 24, Article 68, Colorado Revised Statutes, pertaining to the following described property:'233 East Cooper Avenue, Monarch on the Park Condominiums Unit P-3, City and Townsite of Aspen, Colorado. The vested rights granted hereby shall be subject to all rights of referendum and judicial review. The period of time permitted by law to exercise the right of referendum to refer to the electorate this Section of this Ordinance granting vested rights; or, to seek judicial review of the grant of 3 l P9 vested rights shall not begin to run until the date of publication of the notice of final development approval as set forth above. The rights of referendum described herein shall be no greater than those set forth in the,Colorado Constitution and the Aspen Home Rule Charter. Section 12: This resolution shall not affect any existing litigation and shall not operate as an abatement of any action or proceeding now pending under or by virtue of the ordinances repealed or amended as herein provided, and the same shall be conducted and concluded under such prior ordinances. Section 13• If any section, subsection, sentence, clause, phrase, or portion of this resolution is for any reason held invalid or unconstitutional in.a court of competent jurisdiction, such portion shall be deemed a separate, distinct and independent provision and shall not affect the validity of 'the remaining pos jtpr�thereof. APPROVED BY the Planning and Zoning Commission of the City of Aspen on this 15`h day of M4y,?012. LJ Erspamer, Chairman APPROVED AS TO FORM: Deb Quinn,Assistant City Attorney ATTEST. Jackie Lothian;Deputy City Clerk Exhibit A: Site plan 4 ARCHITECTS SPEN.GOIOR�GG 1 silfTD i� / 01-1--l"'l- 15- WN UHIT 116 I l I IJT 1 I I w i ! s LLJ •� •� \ � � .. � Site Plan at A lI AM J .m P11 Exhibit A Review standards for development in a Specially Planned Area (SPA) A. General: In the review of a development application for a conceptual development plan and a final development plan, the PIanning and Zoning Commission and City Council shall consider the following; 1. Whether the proposed development is compatible with or enhances the mix of development in the immediate vicinity of the parcel in terms of land use, density, height, bulk, architecture,landscaping and open space. Staff Response: The building already exists at 480 Doolittle Drive. The proposed use is compatible with the mix of development _in. the vicinity, in that it is proposed to become an ajfor dgble housing unit, and will be within the mater Place Affordable dousing area. The structure's change in use will not alter the existing land use, height bulk, architecture, lan'd'scaping, or open space, as relatively little exterior changes will occur to the building. Staff 11 finds lhls criterion to be met. 2. Whether sufficient public facilities and roads exist to service the proposed development. Staff Response: The project is presently served by existing roads and public facilities. Staff finds the criterion to be met. 3. Whether the parcel proposed for development is generally suitable for development, considering the slope, ground instability and the possibility of mudflow, rock falls, avalanche dangers and flood hazards. Staff Response: The building already exists on this parcel. There will be no changes that will. affect the possibility of tnudflows, rockfalls, avalanche,dangers and flood hazards. Staff finds tfre criterion to be met. _ 4. Whether the proposed development creatively employs land planning techniques to preserve significant view planes, avoid adverse environmental impacts and provide open space,trails and similar amenities for the users of the project and the public at large. Staff Response: There will be no change in the height and mass of the existing building that will cause impacts to significant view planes, have adverse environmental impacts, or change the way the area's open space, trails, and similar amenities are used. Staff finds the criterion to be met. 5. Whether the proposed development is in compliance with , the Aspen Area omprehens ve Plan. Staff Response: The Aspen Area Comprehensive Plan supports the development of affordable housing. Staff finds the criterion to be met. P12 6. Whether the proposed development will require the,expenditure of excessive public funds to provide public facilities for the parcel or the surrounding neighborhood. Staff Response: The project.will not require any expenditure of excessive public funds to provide public facilities for the parcel or surrounding neighborhood. Public facilities such as roads and infrastructure already serve the building. Stafffinds the criterion to be met. 7. Whether proposed development on slopes in excess of twenty percent (20%) meet the slope reduction and density requirements of Subsection 26.445.040.B.2. Staff Response: There are no slopes in excess of twenty percent (20°yo) below the area of development. Stafffinds the criterion to be met. 8. Whether there are sufficient GMQS allotments for the proposed development. Staff Response: There are no limits to the growth of affordable housing within the City of Aspen. Stafffinds this criterion to be non-applicable. s P13 Exhibit B Affordable housing. The development of affordable housing deed-restricted in accordance with the Aspen/Pitkin County Housing Authority Guidelines. shall be approved, approved with conditions or denied by the.Planning and Zoning Commission based on the following criteria: a. The proposed units comply with the Guidelines of the Aspen/Pitkin County Housing Authority. A recommendation from the Aspen/Pitkin County Housing Authority shall be required for this standard. The Aspen/Pitkin County Housing Authority may choose to hold a public hearing with the Board of Directors., Staff Response: The proposed change in use does comply with the Guidelines of the AspenlPitkin Housing Authority, A recommendation from the AspenlPitkin County Housing Authority is included in Appendix E, Department Responses. However, due to the size of the unit, which is proposed net livable at 508.1 square feet, Staff recommends the unit be deed=restricted'to a for- sale studio, rather than a one-bedroom unit; which will affect the potential for-sale price of the unit. Even with the allowed 20%floor area reduction due per APCHA standards, the,unit does not meet the size standards for a 'one-bedroom Category 3-4 unit. According to APCHA guidelines, Category 3-4 one-bedroom units must be a minimum of 700 sf. With the 20% allowable reduction, the unit must be a minimum size of,560 sf ff6wever, a,Category 4 or lower studio may be a minimum of 500 sf, which this application meets.. Therefore, Staff recommends that the Applicant pursue a for-sale, deed restricted Category 4 or lower studio designation. Stafffinds the criterion to be met, with this condition. b. Affordable housing required for mitigation purposes shall be in the form of actual newly built units or buy-down units. Off-site units shall be provided within the City limits. Units outside the City limits may be accepted as mitigation by the City Council,pursuant to Paragraph 26.470.090.2. If the mitigation requirement is less than one (1) full unit, a cash-in-lieu payment may be accepted by the Planning and Zoning Commission upon a recommendation from the Aspen/Pitkin County Housing Authority. If the mitigation requirement is one (1) or, more units, a cash-in-lieu payment shall require City Council approval, pursuant to Paragraph. 26.470;090.3. A Certificate of Affordable Housing Credit may be used to satisfy mitigation requirements by approval of the Community Development Department Director, pursuant to Section 26.540.080 Extinguishment of the Certificate. Required affordable housing may be provided throng_h a mix of these methods. (Ord.. No. 6 2010, §4) Staff Response: The proposed unit is a deed-restricted affordable housing unit, and requires no further mitigation. Staff finds the criterion to be non-applicable. c. Each unit provided shall be designed such that the finished floor level of fifty percent (50%) or more of the unit's net livable area is at or above natural or finished grade, l whichever 'is higher, This dimensional requirement may be varied through Special Review, Pursuant to Chapter 26.430. (Ord. No. 14-2011, §3) P14 Staff Response: The proposed unit is entirely a one story, at grade building, which requires no dimensional variances. Staff finds the criterion to be met. d. The proposed units shall be deed-restricted as "for sale" units and transferred to qualified purchasers according to the,Aspen/Pitkin County Housing Authority Guidelines. The owner may be entitled to select the first purchasers, subject to the aforementioned qualifications, with approval from the Aspen/Pitkin County Housing Authority. The deed restriction shall authorize the Aspen/Pitkin County Housing Authority or the City to own the unit and rent it to qualified renters as defined in the Affordable Housing Guidelines established by the Aspen/Pitkin County Housing Authority, as amended. The proposed units may be rental units, including but not limited to rental units owned by an employer or nonprofit organization, if a legal instrument in a form acceptable to the City Attorney ensures permanent affordability of the units. The City encourages affordable housing units required for lodge development to'be rental units associated with the lodge operation and contributing to the long-term viability of the lodge. Units owned by the Aspen/Pitkin County Housing Authority, the City of Aspen, Pitkin County or other similar governmental or quasi-municipal agency shall not be subject to this mandatory "for sale" provision. Staff Response: The proposed unit will be deed restricted as a for-sale unit and transferred to qualified purchasers according to the Aspen/Pitkin County Housing Authority Guidelines. Staff finds the criterion.to be met. e. :Non-Mitigation Affordable Housing. Affordable housing units that are not required for mitigation, but`meet the requirements of Section 26.470.070.4(a=d). The owner of such non-mitigation affordable housing is eligible to receive a Certificate of Affordable Housing Credit pursuant to Chapter 26.540. (Ord.No. 6—2010, §4) Staff Response: Staff finds this criterion to be non-applicable. P15 Exhibit C Change in Use. A change in use of an existing property, structure or portions of an existing. structure between the development categories identified in Section 26..470.020 (irrespective of direction), for which a certificate of occupancy has been issued for at least two (2) years and which is intended to be reused, shall be approved, approved with conditions or denied by the Planning and Zoning Commission based on the general requirements outlined in Section 26.470.050. No more than one (1) free=market residential unit may be created through the change-in-use. 1. Sufficient growth management allotments are available to accommodate the proposed development, pursuant to Subsection 26.470.030.D. Applications for multi-year development allotment, pursuant to Paragraph 26.470.090.1 shall. not be required to meet this standard. Staff Response: The proposal is for an affordable housing unit, and no growth management allotments are placed on this type of development, Staff finds this criterion to be non-applicable. 2. The proposed development is consistent with the Aspen Area.Community Plan. Staff Response: Affordable housing is an important component of the Aspen Area Community Plan. This proposal will add a one-bedroom unit to the housing stock. Staff finds the criterion to be met. 3. The development conforms to the requirements and limitations of the zone district. Staff Response: The zoning for this development is Public with a Specially Planned Area overlay,- which verlay;which would require a site specific approval. Staff finds the criterion to be met. 4. .The proposed development is .consistent with the Conceptual Historic Preservation Commission approval, the Conceptual Commercial Design Review approval and the Conceptual Planned Unit Development approval;as applicable Staff Response: Staff finds this criterion to be non-applicable. 5. Unless otherwise specified in this Chapter, sixty percent (60%) of the employees generated by the additional commercial or lodge development, according to Subsection 26.470.100.A, Employee generation rates, are mitigated through the provision of affordable housing. The employee generation mitigation plan shall be approved pursuant to Paragraph 26.470,070.4,Affordable housing,at a Category 4 rate as defined in the Aspen/Pitkin County Housing Authority Guidelines, as amended. An applicant may choose to provide mitigation units at a lower category designation. If an applicant chooses to use a Certificate of Affordable Housing Credit as mitigation,pursuant to Chapter-26.540, such Certificate shall be extinguished pursuant to Chapter 26.540.90 Criteria for Administrative Extinguishment of the Certificate. (Ord.No, 6 -20I0, §2) P16 Staff Response: This proposal is for a voluntary affordable housing unit. No employee mitigation is necessary in this event. Stafffinds this criterion to be non-applicable. 6. Affordable housing net livable area, for which the finished floor level is at or above natural or finished grade, whichever is higher, shall be provided in an amount equal to at least thirty percent(30%) of the additional free-market residential net livable area, for which the finished floor level is at or above natural or finished grade, whichever is higher. Affordable housing shall be approved pursuant to Paragraph 26.470.070.4, Affordable housing, and be restricted to a Category 4 rate as defined in the Aspen/Pitkin County Housing Authority Guidelines, as amended. An applicant may choose to provide mitigation units at a lower category designation. Affordable housing units that are being provided absent a requirement ("voluntary units")may be deed-restricted at any level of affordability, including residential occupied.If an applicant chooses to use a Certificate of Affordable Housing Credit as mitigation, pursuant to Chapter 26.540, such Certificate shall be extinguished pursuant to Chapter 26.540.90 Criteria for Administrative Extinguishment of the Certificate, utilizing the calculations in Section 26.470.100 Employee/Square Footage Conversion. (Ord.No. 6—2010, §2) Staff Response: The proposal is for a voluntary affordable housing unit and not as mitigation for free market residential development. Stafffinds this criterion to be non-applicable. 7. The project represents minimal additional demand on public infrastructure, or such additional demand is mitigated through improvement proposed as part of the project. Public infrastructure includes, but is not limited to, water supply, sewage treatment, energy and communication utilities, drainage control, fire and police protection, solid waste disposal, parking and road and transit services. (Ord. No. 14, 2007, §1) Staff Response: As a one-bedroom unit, the project represents minimal additional demand on public infrastructure. There will be no need for additional roads, fire and police protection utilities, drainage control, solid waste disposal, or parking and road and transit services. Staff finds the criterion to be met. J P17 Exhibit D 8040 Greenline review standards. No development shall be permitted at, above or one hundred fifty (150) feet below the 8040 Greenline unless the Planning and Zoning Commission makes a determination that the proposed development complies with all requirements set forth below. 1. The parcel on which the proposed development is to be located is suitable for development considering its slope, ground stability characteristics, including mine subsidence and the possibility of mudflow, rock falls and avalanche dangers. If the parcel is found to contain hazardous or toxic soils, the applicant shall stabilize and revegetate the soils or, where.necessary, cause them to be removed from the site to a location acceptable to the City. Staff Response: The parcel on which the development already exists is a flat site, suitable for this existing development.. No stabilization, revegetation, or mitigation of toxic soils is necessary. Stafffi,nds the criterion to be met. 2. The proposed development does not have a significant adverse affect on the natural watershed, runoff, drainage, soil erosion or have consequent effects of water pollution. Staff Response: The development already exists. The proposed minor changes (carport with storage and covered front entry).are expected to have no adverse,affects as they wt11 be constructed on the existing asphalt base, and no new disturbance is expected to occur. Staff finds the criterion to be met. 4. The proposed development does not have a significant adverse affect on the air quality in the City. Staff Response: The proposed change in use will have no significant adverse affect on the air quality in the City. Staff finds the criterion to be met. 4. The design and location of any proposed development, road or trail is compatible with the temain on the parcel on which the proposed development is to be located. Staff Response: The primary building already exists and is found to be compatible with the parcel's terrain. The proposed minor development (carport with storage and covered front entry) is also compatible with the parcel's terrain, as it'will be located on the existing flat asphalt surface. No new roads or trails are proposed for this change in use project. Staff finds the criterion to be met. 5. Any grading will minimize, to the extent practicable, disturbance to the terrain, vegetation and natural land features. Staff Response; No grading is proposed with this application. Staff f nds the criterion to be met. P18 6. The placement and clustering of structures will minimize the need for roads, limit cutting and grading, maintain open space and preserve the mountain as a scenic resource. Staff Response: The structure is pre-existing and will undergo minimal development and a change in use. There is no need for additional roads or cutting and grading, and open space and preservation will not be changed by this proposal. Staff finds the criterion to be met. 7. Building height and bulk will be minimized and the structure will be designed to blend into the open character of the mountain. Staff Response: The structure is a single story, and smaller in mass and height than the adjacent two story affordable housing units and storage units. Stafffinds the criterion to be met. 8. Sufficient water pressure and other utilities are available to service the proposed development. Staff Response: Sufficient water pressure and'other utilities are available to service this project, Staff finds the criterion to be met. 9. Adequate roads are available to serve the proposed development.and said roads can be properly maintained. Staff Response: Adequate roads are available to serve the proposed development, which are properly maintained by the City of Aspen. No additional roads or maintenance needs are proposed for this development. Staff finds the criterion to be met. 10. Adequate ingress and egress is available to the proposed development so as to ensure adequate access for fire protection and snow removal equipment. J Staff Response: Adequate ingress and egress is currently available for this project for fire protection and snow removal equipment. Staff finds the criterion to be met. 11. The recommendations of the Aspen Area Community Plan: Parks/Recreation/Trails Plan are implemented in the proposed development, to the greatest extent practical. (Ord. No. 55-2000, § 7) Staff Response: This proposal is.located adjacent to a neighborhood park, the Waite/Robinson Park, Water Place trail system, and Twin Ridge Open Space. Staff finds the criterion to be met. P19 Exhibit E Residential Design Standards. Variances from the Residential Design Standards, Section 26.410.040, which do not meet this Section may be granted by the Planning and Zoning Commission, the Board of Adjustment.or the Historic Preservation Commission, if the project is subject to the requirements of Chapter 26,415. An applicant who desires to consolidate other requisite land use review by the Historic Preservation Commission, the Board of Adjustment or the Planning and Zoning Commission may elect to have the variance application decided by the board or commission reviewing the other land use application. An applicant who desires a variance from the Residential Design Standards shall demonstrate and the deciding board shall find that the variance, if granted.would: a. Provide an appropriate design or pattern of development considering the context in which the development is proposed and the purpose of the particular standard. In evaluating the context as it is used in the criteria, the reviewing board may consider the relationship of the proposed development with adjacent structures, the immediate neighborhood setting or a broader vicinity as the board feels is necessary to determine if the exce ,tion is warranted; or p� _ . b. Be clearly necessary for reasons of fairness related .to unusual site-specific constraints. (Ord. No. 52=2003, § 5; Ord.No. 20-2005, § 1) Staff Response: This unit is proposed within a pre-existing affordable housing SPA, and the building proposed surrounding pattern o development is a for the change in use is also pre-existing. .The su g p f p horseshoe grouping of affordable housing buildings and storage units for these buildings. As this building was formerly used as an emergency response center for the water treatment plant, it is situated on the southern portion of the grouping, Due to the fact that this building already exists, there will be limited exterior development necessary to complete the change in use. The applicant is proposing to maintain the exterior materials and massing, The exterior changes that will occur are minor, and include the addition of o carport with storage unit and a covered front entryway. The building as proposed will meet the Residential Design.Guidelines in the Code in all ways but one. As it exists, the.building's front faeade is perpendicular to the street.. The Code requires the following: • According to Section 26.410.040 (A) (1.) Building orientation of the Land Use Code, the front facades of all principal structures shall be parallel to the street. In this instance, the existing buildings front faeade faces south, and Doolittle. Drive runs rtorth/south. Therefore the front faeade does not face the street. Due to the pre.-existing nature of this building, and the applicant's desire to limit the amount of exterior renovation performed on this building, The applicant requests a variance from this section of the Code. i PLO e According to Section 26.410.040 (D) (1.) Street oriented entrance and principal window of the Land Use Code, the unit, as a single-family home, should have a street oriented entrance and principal window. Due to the pre-existing nature of the building and applicant's desire to use the building as it exists to the extent possible, the unit will not have a street oriented entrance and principal window. The applicant requests a variance from this section of the Code. a. The entry door shall face the street and be no more than ten (10) feet back from the front-most wall of the building. Entry doors shall not be taller than eight(8) feet. Staff Response: The applicant requests a variance from the requirement of a street facing entry door. b. A street-facing principal window requires that a significant window or group or windows face street. Staff Response: This project requests a variance from the requirement 6f a street facing principal window, and from the requirement that a significant window or group of window face the street. The applicant is requesting from Planning and Zoning Commission the approval of the above residential design variances that are necessary due to the site specific constraints that are created by the adaptive reuse of an existing building, causing it to not meet residential design code standards that would be possible if the building were demolished and rebuilt. Staff finds the criterion to be met for the approval for these residential design variances. 1 I P21 April 27, 2012 THE CITY OF ASPEN WATER DEPARTMENT , To whom it may concern; The property,located at 480 Doolittle Drive,what the Water.depaitment has referred to as the Emergency Response Center(ERC)since it's construction,has never housed ,stored, filled, spilled, cleaned up? remediated, nor decontaminated anything having to do with any Hazardous Chemicals what so ever. I have personally managed this facility since its construction and it was staffed as a training, staging area for emergency responders only. Please contact me if I may be further assistance. f Charles U. Bailey Treatment Supervisor City of Aspen Water Dept. 130 South Galena St. Aspen, CO 8161.1 970-920-5110 i chu ckb&i.aspen.co.us • I I . I I I . . I 130 SouTH GALENA STREET • ASPEN,COLORADO 81611-1975 • PHoNE 970.920.5110 FAx 970.920.5117 - I i Printed m Recycled raper . I P22 Date: May 9, 2012 Project: Doolittle Affordable Housing City of Aspen Engineering Department DRC Comments .These comments are not intended to be exclusive, but an initial response to the project packet submitted for purpose of the DRC meeting. General A compliant and accurate survey, must be submitted. We are unable to determine (among other things) utility easements and access easements needed for the site. Drainage: General note: The design for the site must meet the Urban Runoff Management Plan Requirements. Staff was not able to determine whether or not the site will meet these requirements. A full review will be completed when there is enough information to review. A compliant drainage plan must be submitted prior to final plat. Staff was unable to determine whether or not the site is able to meet the Drainage Principals: 1.Consider stormwater quality needs early in the design process 2.Use the entire site when planning for stormwater quality treatment. 3.Avoid unnecessary impervious area. 4.Reduce runoff rates and volumes to more closely match natural conditions. 5.Integrate stormwater quality management and flood control. 6.Develop stormwater quality facilities that enhance the site,the community, and the environment. 7.Use a treatment train approach. 8.Design sustainable facilities that can be safely maintained. 9. Design and maintain facilities with public safety in mind. Construction Management—A construction management plan must be submitted in conjunction with the building permit application. The plan must include a planned sequence of construction that minimizes construction impacts to the public. The plan shall describe mitigation for: parking, staging/encroachments,truck traffic, noise, dust, and erosion/sediment pollution. Fee in Lieu—This project is considered a Major,project and is subject to the Fee in Lieu P23 please refer to Section 2.12.140 of the Municipal Code. i l I I I i l i i i P24 MEMORANDUM TO: Sara Nadolny FROM: Cindy Christensen, APCHA Operations Manager DATE: May 2, 2012 RE: CHEMICAL TREATMENT BUILDING REMODEL Parcel ID No. ISSUE: The applicant is requesting to remodel a structure into a deed-restricted affordable housing unit. BACKGROUND: The structure was used for chlorine disaster preparedness. At no name were harmful chemicals get in the structure. The structure has been unused for years and the remodel would provide needed employee housing. The cost of the remodel is to be from the fund that is supported by the City departments and not from the 150 affordable housing development fund that is provided with taxpayer money. The City plans to utilize the remodeled structure for a City employee similar to the Water Place housing project. Although the application is proposing the unit be a Category 3 or Category 4 ownership unit, it has been the City's objective to provide housing for any City employee. The unit is proposed at 572 square feet, which is a Category 1 or 2 for a one-bedroom unit stated in the Guidelines. Water Place housing does not specify categories for any of the 22 available units. The category is based on the employee purchasing the unit. RECOMMENDATION: Due to the fact that one-bedroom units are the most sought-after type of unit, based on the location of the proposed affordable housing unit, and in conjunction with the funding of the remodel through the City of Aspen employee fund, APCHA staff is recommending approval of the remodel, as it provides an additional affordable housing unit into the program. The deed restriction should be similar to the Water Place housing project. 1 P25 Memorandum Date: April 30, 2012 ` To: Sara Nadolny From: Brian Flynn, Parks Department Re: DRC comments for 500 Doolittle Drive Houlsing I -----------------------------------------------------------i------------------------------------------------ Per City Code 13.20 an approved tree permit is required for the removal of'any tree or the excavation under the drip line of the tree. Parks is requiring that the tree permit be approved prior'td approval of building permits. Mitigation for removals will be paid cash in lieu or onsite per City Code 13.20. i A vegetation protection fence shall be erected at the drip line of each individual tree or groupings of trees remaining on site and their represented drip lines.A formal plan indicating the location of the tree protection will be required for the bldg permit set.No excavation,storage of materials, storage of construction backfill,storage of equipment;foot or vehicle traffic allowed within the drip line of a i y tree remaining on site.This fence.must be inspected by the city forester or his/her designee (920-5120) before any construction activities are to commence. As referenced in Chapter 13.20 I i . I i i i I I • • • • • 0 e • • • • Chemical 'Treatment Building Remodel e , • Aspen Water Place PUD • • • • • TYPE OF APPLICATION: • • ® SPA Amendment, • • Growth Management Review, • • 8040 Greenline Review • • Residential Design Standards. • • • • • • ® Aspen `Vater Place Buildinj Remodel REPRESENTATIVE: Jeff Pendarvis, . 970.429.2786 OWNER: City of Aspen Project Architect; Steven Buettow p 970-925-1693 . buettow(a�sopris.net ® Remodel existing emergency chemical treatment building into Affordable Housing. ® CITY OF ASPEN, Water Place Subdivision • Table of Contents: Cover ® Title Sheet • Project Description Project Index Sheet Project Vicinity Map: • Site Plan . Existing Building Photographs • Pre-application Summary Project Written authorization: Written description of Project: SPA, GMQS, 8040 Greenline, Residential Design • Land Use application • application requirements f�1 Steven Buettow ELM N III w ® Aspen Water Treatment Plant Remodel ® REPRESENTATIVE: .Iefl'Pendarvis, 970.429.2786 ® OWNER: City of Aspen Project Architect; Steven Buettow 970-925-1693 ® buettow(a)sopris.net applicant; City of Aspen ® 130 S. Galena St. ® Aspen, Co. 920-5085 or 429-2739 representative; Steven Buettow, architect ® 29 grey talon ct. Aspen, Co. 81611 970-925-1693 buettow(a)_sopris.net ® We have designated Steven Buettow, architect to represent the City of Aspen to obtain approval of this Water Place Housin� proje t. Jeff f endarvis, Asset Management 49 Aspen Water Place Building Remodel REPRESENTATIVE: Jeff Pendarvis, 970.429.2786 OWNER: City of Aspen j Project Architect; Steven Quettow 970-925-1693 buettowawsopris.net PROJECT SUMMARY: Remodel of the existing Water Place Emergency Response Facility building into Affordable Housing Studio. TYPE OF APPLICATION: SPA Amendment,Growth Management Review, 8040 Greenline Review and Reside#ial Design Standards. DESCRIPTION: The City of Aspen is requesting approval to change the use of the former Emergency Response Facility building located in the Water Plant Affordable Housing SPA(Specially Planned Area). The building was formally used for potential chlorine disaster response—however due to changes in the Water Departments purification process,the site is no longer needed for its former use. The COA proposes to change the building into an affordable housing unit.The Emergency Response building is (approximately 572 sq ft)comprised of an office, bathroom, shower facilities and onsite parking. It is a one story building located adjacent to the Water Plant Affordable Housing development. Doolittle Drive is the access route to the site. This existing unit faces south toward the existing access spur road. A. Unit Description This project proposes to remodel an existing public facility that is no longer required into an affordable housing unit.The building's location,shape,materials and color will not be changed relative to its existing elevation.The present building has 8040 greenline approval. A new covered front entry of 70 SF will be added along with new entry doors and window locations. A new adjacent covered Am qV carport with 44 SF storage closet will be built on the east side of the unit.The closet is four foot deep by eleven feet long with a pair of double doors opening to the South along the eleven foot length.These are the new elements to the existing building. The new unit is proposed to be a Category 3 or.4 unit for sale. The neve unit will have southern exposure,covered porch,parking and the possibility of a summer walk out additional living space.The interior walls will be reconfigured. All exterior materials will remain the same. Any new materials required on the south and west sides will match the existing. The proposed unit is 572 SF ® The Unit will have 508.1 SF of habitable living SF Since we are working with an existing building,we are requesting a reduction in the required minimum size based AM on these APCHA standards; 1. Significant storage-additional storage outside the unit, 2. Efficient and flexible layout-limit to space used for halls and staircases, 3. Site amenities-pool,near to park or open space, ® 4. Location within the project-above ground versus ground level or below ground 5. And we can achieve higher density of deed restricted units with this variance. 0 0 B. SPA-Review standards for development in a Specially Planned Area(SPA) ® In the review of a development application for a conceptual development plan and a final development plan,the Planning and Zoning Commission and City Council shall consider the following: ® There is presently a building on site in this location. ® • The buildings height, location and mass will not be changed. • The Project is presently serviced by existing roads and public facilities. • The remodel of the existing building changes a non residential use into a new affordable housing unit. ® This development is in compliance with the Aspen Area Comprehensive Plan. • This project will require no expenditure of excessive public funds to provide public facilities for the parcel or the .surrounding neighborhood. ® • The existing building is located on a flat site. C. GMOS For additional affordable housing units there are no limits to growth in Pitkin County. The GMQS does not limit the annual growth rate of affordable housing and lodging facilities, This project complies with the Guidelines of the Aspen Area Community Plan ® This project complies with the Guideline, requirements and limitations of the zone district. The project is all at ground level. This project is an existing building with existing public services which will remain unchanged D. 8040 Greenline review The applicant shall submit a letter to the Community Development Director, list of how the project meets the exemption criteria. 1. Dear Community Development Director, This project should have an 8040 Greenline review exemption because it has a current approval for its location and building height.The present buildings location,elevation and height will not be changed. Therefore any additional review will be of the existing elevation,which should be exempt, since there are no changes. All exemption criteria listed below are met and we request 8040 review exemption. ® 6 There is no increase in floor area. • There are no trees removed. • The location is the same and previously approved. ® E. Residential Design Standards This is an existing one story building. It will not be moved The exterior walls and roof will not be changed Although Doolittle Drive is a North South access route to the site,the subdivision housing units are faced toward East West cul-de-sac access roads. So this existing unit faces south toward the existing access spur road. There will be a new covered front porch of 70 SF min. and at least 6'in depth. The mass, materials and height.stay the ® same. A new covered carport will be added to the East side. It will be I I feet wide by 22 feet long. ® The main building mass is 26 feet. The carport width is I1 feet. The front most street facing column is 1'-5 1/2"behind the unit's front elevation. The front door faces the access spur. The main window will face the access spur. There will be no multi story window. All windows will be square. There are no light wells • • • 0 • Steven Buettow • • Aspen Water Treatment Plant Subdivision REPRESENTATIVE: Jeff Pendarvis, 970.429.2786 OWNER: City of Aspen Project Architect; Steven Buettow 970-925-1693 buettow(a)sopris.net • -A written description of the proposal and a written explanation of how a proposed development • complies with the review standards relevant to the development application • • WRITTEN DESCRIPTION: The City of Aspen Asset Department is interested in changing the use of a building located in the Water Plant Affordable Housing SPA (Specially Planned Area). The building is currently used for potential chlorine disaster ® preparedness. The Asset Department would like to change the building into a one bedroom affordable housing unit. The emergency response building is (approximately 550 sq ft) comprised of an office, bathroom and 10 attached parking. It is a one story building located at the south end of the affordable housing parking lot of ® Water Plant Affordable Housing (Doolittle Drive, Lot 3). The existing building's foundation, flooring, walls and ® roof structure will be retained in place. New doors, windows will be installed into the existing walls. A new entry roof will be placed on the South and a covered carport with enclosed storage will be added to the East •i elevation. The existing mechanical and electrical systems will be updated to provide adequate service. There ® will be no structural changes. City services will not be changed. • • • • s o a • • s • • • • • • ............ 17 1 ET;ELLFHCE AF;ER ALL ........... Lu i `` `\\ '�� P t 0 ti ml U) O 7z WIG T- 41 Y-' LON17 Lij CL Leo 21 44 . ..... ��.I ,. — _ _ \` — \ _—. t /�. ///1/ / JUL 2 5 1997 LOPtAEIJ S - LAN Ir ffEP �'Ohn EM. Site Plan All — a t � S LE� ER TDIA OMCRP InTN VIM O41 K2 '3 ( E�CELLErl.E ti y EKpO ROARING FORK RD m' IypBYp _ - IIOUlifl s V v , .1-VIPIEA I. T 2.WILLIAMS GAY r .i z Ott LESPIF.ST �yy•-1 - 3.RACE ST- ! - • - A.SPRUCE ST- 'J 4Uv P: `- • R'i} .•SPRUCE;SF w NQR TtI I -'�' .5.PARK CR. f:1 6,TEAL CT. I,IWIAA(;U Nl$A LT t _ 'UUCC ''+,1. 1 A'Fpf ! - 7.FREE SILVER Cl. Q QO I H S'--' rNA NC, 87 ' ..7LF t NRRp' 7 : (l ! F `3 L.NICHOLAS JAX AVE W pD HALt4 .OAK LfJ- ....., MAROON CRC- SM D LN. y1 PP eSON m O tOACQTTQNViOQ .Z o' PfxFH PMH ST n�F 3 4.5:. z� 12.IIAPLF.LN, Ur +13-GIBSON AVE. Af :i '1d.KING ST. z t ,�. .....1{QP T d t - - • RIO Cq l ,.A 15.QUEEN ST. iii ➢ rn m tiKFNS AYE s"`a ft ti �ryp 12 A• '',0 16.MIDLAND AVE. i ... 9. ^ n :'f o „riI% R F... 13: Qr to SMUGGLER 17. TTIE IGRUVF.RD. Q 1444 "+ 1 v -1s.ARDMORE DR. _ U y AYE : S v y 4.-: 4 y 20.ARDMORE Ci. LfJ C00, Ay - W $ t q .. 15. 21.ALPINE GT U _ E : �V :., �. Iq7 Y I 17. 22-ALICE LN. 1 It 1 .'.Y20 H [5r'I'�W� ,14 Q '.7-' 't liH+ PARK' h,:�.' .,ANTAYF MCSKIMMIYG RD , w zi fP r3 ASPEN GROVE RD �UQRF.DR f f • I� I 1 WESTYIEW DR. 1.JUAN ST v flu .1' S c.RfO GRAM .. 2.GILBERT ST ... u 7.DEAN ST Y f; ..1 , _ .. — 'CON RI) A,SUMMIT ST I ti NOUD p —- V !` If, I t (A} FAST R FP .SMAVMK)D0. 6.ASPEN ALPS PL X[ r f J I SrAI LAKE -- 2.CINNAMONCT 6.WATERS AVE p,� I - � -- –_ 3.BLUEBONNETTR.+ 1.UTE PLACE G ��'` I A -pC - I A•PRIMROSE.PATH P ' _ 5.LARKSPUR LN _ AUPEY MU UIt Ih. �l f I ,"1 I p - `} UP f r'I .Q T.LAUREL II SKI ARFt. fr i _I I I,i, I. , '®HC AS PEN • II.OOOLITTLE DR f_ Gj, CL!IB p ,I •I Vicinity May, 1 It LAN D`: 9 OOOL.ITTLE CR 9L V. ARFA f I e ♦� E•.,'.. i A1.3 :CPI:7{` 11.C.P,`�S^ I 11 I 11:AIL _..--._._._......__..._.... i W � � t 1*J•aa' ^a gni' �91 � I 1. I it ._ }�� y3� � v'a�,.{l qtr uk,S,4r - � � .•„ T r X71 ''i f �•! 1��+��R�1 � �',�TMf'�3�,�{4�.��1, I�.�I�;.II�III�IIIII�III� '�C•�� E � jt� 'I �t ��,,{•"'�'t •�'}�F�IJ 111 � I..,7 t iNOI'k 4� o+tw��:��' ° !t� �. �lY�: �I I. "est�sf �' v"'x�+��•'• � IIT'' c15�Y r•a n 5' Y 91 IfI .t r \ 3. 4i•. r r i +' ?,� g •,1• s_� 'y HJT n "u�j�.J {} Ivz45. .J•, _T ` 71I. 41 , ' l •t ! �4i. pl bvf 1 rift I�I y 1 1,��g °c 11X � btsiT�� kc'e'' �Ri t4�� (�11 Il �l F, eB � 9 ... 4�'f�dc}'a vM�• S,. ..r,rp xJt�fq It 1 ,I!Me a y+ ! l1n 't• !} t{lir i i1i1G � 7J�N� J ��a:. .. � �� Ili,^ Fi. � I „�,tt\:�� ' � !�iP{e qx�,i�? 11 I + ` F�'•rc'�.,:I _ ID11 L � � i:}�� •1 ''�� \\ \ !1 (D � yo '�.1 `�' I:e11t e t A3 1�..., s:tl! Aky It 1kk S �'•i "'Si Ery ffb Y{, WATER PLACE HOUSING REMODEL Fl. C� I7 i � CI P OF ASPEN PRE-APPLICATION CONFERENCE SUMMARY PLANNER: Claude Salter, 970.429.2752,Jessica Garrow 429.2780 DATE: 03/14/2011 i PROJECT: Aspen Water Treatment Plant Subdivision FEES UPDATED: 12/9/1.1 REPRESENTATIVE: Jeff Pendarvis, 970.429.2786 OWNER: City of Aspen ® TYPE OF APPLICATION: SPA Amendment, Growth Management Reviews DESCRIPTION: The City of Aspen Asset Department is interested in changing the use of a building located in the Water Plant Affordable Housing SPA (Specially Planned Area). The building is currently used for potential chlorine disaster ® preparedness. The Asset Department would to change the building into a studio or one bedroom affordable housing unit. The emergency response building is (approximately 550 sq ft) comprised of an office, bathroom and attached parking. It is a one story building located at the south end of the atfordable housing parking lot of Water Plant Affordable Housing(Doolittle Drive, Lot 3). Ordinance No. 23 (1996)established the Water Treatment Plant and Affordable Housing Project which consisted of 23 deed restricted affordable housing units. The development was created to house City employees, including emergency response personnel,adjacent to the City's water treatment and distribution facilities(Lot 4). The emergency response building is not discussed in Ordinance No. 23 (1996) nor is conversion of it to a residential unit. It does appear on the Water Treatment Plant & Affordable Housing Project SPA and Subdivision Final Plat sheet C8,C15,Al and Al2. A project of this nature would require an amendment to the Water Plant Affordable Housing SPA. It would not qualify as an insubstantial amendment because the project requires a variation from the SPA's original approvals. The process to amend the SPA requires a review and recommendation from the Planning and Zoning Commission. City Council will need to grant final approval. The project would require a Growth Management review for the Change in Use , changing an essential public facility into affordable housing and the development of AfTordable Housini:. The Planning and Zoning Commission grants final approval on these two reviews. An 8040 Greenline Review applies to any development located at or above 8040 feet above mean seal level. Pursuant to the Land Use Code the proposed conversion of an emergency response building consisting of an office, bathroom and garage may meet the exemption criteria. The applicant shall submit a letter to the Community Development Director, list of how the project meets the exemption criteria and have a signature block for pending approval of the Com.Dev Director. The letter may also include exhibits to better illustrate ihow the project meets the exemptions. The project is subject to the residential design standards. Parking standards should be evaluated for the new use. ® Staff is requiring a land use application to ensure the correct land use process is handled before work is begun. The review will include the Planning and Zoning Commission, and City Council and public noticing is required. Below is a link to the Land Use application form and the Land Use Code for your convenience. ® Land Use Application: htT:HNvww.asl)enpitkin.com/Portals/O/docs/City/Coindev/Apps%20and%20Fees/2011%201and%20use%2.0app%2 Oform.pdf Land Use Code: ® littp://www.aspenpitkin.com/Departments/Community-DevelopmentIPIanning-and-Zoning/Titte-26-Land-LJse- Code/ • • Land Use Code Section(s) 26.304 Common Development Review Procedures 26.440.050 Review standards for development in a Specially Planned Area (SPA) 26.440.090(B)(C) Amendment to development Order 26.440.060(B) Final Development Plan • 26.470.050(B) GMQS—General Requirements 26.470.070(2) GMQS- Change in Use 26.470.070(4) GMQS- Affordable Housing 26.435.040(B) 8040 Greenline Review,exemptions 26.410 Residential Design Standards 26.515 Off-Street Parking • Review by: Community Development Staff for complete application, P&Z(Planning and • Zoning Commission) for Growth Management reviews, P&Z and City Council for SPA amendment. Planning Fees: $10,080 for a Major SPA Amendment. This includes thirty-two (32)hours of • staff review time. Additional time over thirty-two (32) hours will be billed at ® $315 per hour Referral Fees: $1,575 Housing Referral Fee $265 deposit for I hours of Engineering Department staff time. Additional time above the deposit amount will be billed at $265 per hour. Total Deposit: $11,920 • Total Number of Application Copies: 20 Copies To apply, submit the following information • (Notal Deposit for review of application. Pre-application Conference Summary. • f Applicant's name, address and telephone number, contained within a letter signed by the applicant • stating the name, address, and telephone number of the representative authorized to act on behalf of the applicant. Street address and legal description of the parcel on which development is proposed to occur, consisting Of a current certificate from a title insurance company, or attorney licensed to practice in the State of ® Colorado, listing the names of all owners of the property, and all mortgages,judgments, liens, easements, contracts and agreements affecting the parcel, and demonstrating the owner's right to apply for the Development Application. � Ln Completed Land Use application and signed fee agreement. [] Proof of ownership • .[],Site improvement survey including topography and vegetation showing the current status of the parcel b certified by a registered land surveyor, licensed in the State of Colorado. • • • ®_ A site plan depicting the Ased layout and the project's physicall&tionship to the land and its surroundings. • Dimensional drawings (to scale) of the proposed work, including elevations that display existing and proposed ro osed structure height measured from grade. � ( Existing photographs of the site. [Q An 8 1/2" x 11" vicinity map locating the subject parcels within the City of Aspen. a [�] Two copies of the Land Use Application and all additional letters, maps, and agreements. • A written description of the proposal and a written explanation of how a proposed development • complies with the review standards relevant to the development application Disclaimer: The foregoing summary is advisory in nature only and is not binding on the City. The summary is based on current zoning, which is subject to change in the future, and upon factual representations that may or may not be accurate. The summary does not create a legal or vested right. • The proposed change to the emergency response building would require an amendment to the SPA pursuant to the Land Use Code Section 26.440.090(B) Amendment to development order. The modifications shall be approved • pursuant the terms and procedures of the Final Development Plan. • • 0 • • • • • s • • • • • • • Steven Buettow Aspen Water Treatment Plant Subdivision REPRESENTATIVE: Jeff Pendarvis, 970.429.2786 OWNER: City of Aspen Project Architect; Steven Buettow 970-925-1693 buettow(cb-sopris.net s Aspen/ Pitkin County Housing Authority 530 E. Main St. Suite LL Aspen, Colorado 81611-1948 970-920-5050 Proposed Unit Approval: Remodel from existing stand alone Chemical treatment Office into a New One Bedroom Condominium for sale to an essential community member. This project proposes to remodel an existing public facility that is no longer required into a one bedroom affordable housing unit. The building's location, shape, materials and color will not be changed relative to its • existing elevation. The present building has 8040 greenline approval. A new covered front will be added,new door and window locations, a new storage shed at the back of the new covered carport. These are the new elements to the existing building. . The new unit is proposed to be a Category 3 or 4 unit for sale. The new unit will be a very comfortable one bedroom unit with separate entry, Southern exposure, covered porch and parking and the possibility of a Summer walk out recreation space. The existing Garage and Door will be • eliminated. The interior walls will be reconfigured. New windows will be installed. All exterior materials will remain the same. The new materials required on the South and West sides will be aged to match the existing. The new unit is proposed to be a Category 3 or 4 unit for sale to an essential member of the community. • The proposed unit is 572 SF The Unit will have 508.1 SF of habitable living SF Additional attached Storage will be 44 SF. Since we are working with an existing unit, we are requesting a reduction in the required minimum size based on these APCHA standards;........ 1. Significant storage-additional storage outside the unit, • 2. efficient and flexible layout-limit to space used for halls and staircases, 3. site amenities- pool, near to park or open space, 4. location within the project-above ground versus ground level or below ground 0 5. and we can achieve higher density of deed restricted units with this variance. s 0 • Steven Buettow S ! Aspen Water Treatment Plant Subdivision REPRESENTATIVE: Jeff Pendarvis, 970.429.2786 OWNER: City of Aspen Project Architect; Steven Buettow 970-925-1693 buettow(olisopris.net • SPA; Change in Use SPA This application improves the subdivision by taking a non-congruous usage (chemical treatment) and • conforming the space into an affordable housing unit similar to the rest of the subdivision. B. A project of this nature would require an amendment to the Water Plant Affordable Housing SPA. It would not qualify as an insubstantial amendment because the project requires a variation from the SPA's original approvals. The process to amend the SPA requires a review and recommendation from the Planning and Zoning S Commission. City Council will need to grant final approval. � l. .1 change in the use A. Conceptual Development Plan. 1. Contents of application. The contents of the development application for a Conceptual Development Plan shall include the following: a. The general application information required in Common Development Review Procedures set forth at Chapter 26.304.030. This project is located in the Water place PUD, owned by the City, in the vicinity ql'the hospital and Water Plant. See Site Plan and Vicinity Map. o b. A conceptual description of the proposed development. This shall include, but not be limited to a • statement of the intent of the proposed development and a conceptual description of proposed land • uses, densities, design concepts, access ways and a general time schedule for construction of the proposed development. See written description; c. A statement outlining in conceptual terms how the proposed development will be served with the • appropriate public facilities and how assurances will be made that those public facilities are available to serve the proposed development. The present building has public services that will not be changed. d. A Conceptual Site Plan, illustrating: (1) Existing natural and manmade features. (2) General configuration of proposed land uses, access ways and existing and proposed utilities. (3) Schematic drawings of o proposed buildings, indicating general site design features and overall mass and height of proposed structures. See Site Plan. • SPA'Amendment Review 6k ria' Please res6ond t6 46ese f6r the SPA Aittendirier t Sec. 26.440.050. Review standards for development in a Specially Planned Area (SPA). A. General. In the review of a development application for a conceptual development plan and a final development plan, the Planning and Zoning Commission and City Council shall consider the following: 1. Whether the proposed development is compatible with or enhances the mix of development in the • immediate vicinity of the parcel in terms of land use, density, height, bulk, architecture, landscaping and open space. There is presently a building a building on site in this location. The buildings height location and mass will not be changed. 2. Whether sufficient public facilities and roads exist to service the proposed development. The project is presently serviced by existing roads and public facilities. There will be no change. 3. Whether the parcel proposed for development is generally suitable for development, considering the slope, ground instability and the possibility of mudflow, rock falls, avalanche dangers and flood hazards. There is presently a building a building on site in this location. 4. Whether the proposed development creatively employs land planning techniques to preserve significant view planes, avoid adverse environmental impacts and provide open space, trails and similar amenities for the users of the project and the public at large. There is presently a building a building on site in this location. The buildings height location and mass will not be changed. 5. Whether the proposed development is in compliance with the Aspen Area Comprehensive Plan. The remodel of the existing building changes a non residential use into a new I bedroom affordable housing unit. ® 6. Whether the proposed development will require the expenditure of excessive public funds to provide public facilities for the parcel or the surrounding neighborhood. This project will require no expenditure of excessive public funds to provide public facilities.for the parcel or the surrounding neighborhood. 7. Whether proposed development on slopes in excess of twenty percent (20%) meet the slope reduction and density requirements of Subsection 26.445.040.B.2. The existing building is located on a flat site. i 8. Whether there are sufficient GMQS allotments for the proposed development. for additional affordable housing units there is no limits to growth in Pitkin County. The burden shall rest upon an applicant to demonstrate the general reasonableness and suitability of the proposed development and its conformity to the standards and procedures of this Chapter and Section; provided, however, that in the review of the conceptual development plan, consideration will be given. only to the general concept for the development, while during the review of the final development plan, detailed evaluation of the specific aspects of the development will be accomplished. B. Variations permitted. The final development plan shall comply with the requirements of the • underlying zone district; provided, however,that variations from those requirements may be allowed based on the standards of this Section. Variations may be allowed for the following requirements: open space, minimum distance between buildings, maximum height, minimum front yard, minimum rear yard, minimum side yard, minimum lot width, minimum lot area, trash access area, internal floor area ratio, number of off-street parking spaces and uses and design standards of Chapter 26.410 for streets and related improvements. Any variations allowed shall be specified in the SPA agreement ® and shown on the final development plan. ® Steven Buettow • Aspen Water Treatment Plant Subdivision REPRESENTATIVE: Jeff Pendarvis, S 970.429.2786 ®OWNER: City of Aspen Project Architect; Steven Buettow 970-925-1693 • buettow .sopris.net Ibis project proposes to remodel an existing public facility that is no longer required into a one bedroom • affordable housing unit. 16 The project would require a Growth Management review for the Change in Use ,changing an essential public facility into affordable housing and the development of Affordable Housing. The Planning and Zoning Commission grants final approval on these two reviews. GMQS for additional affordable housing units there is no limits to growth in Pitkin County. Sec. 26.470.030 Therefore, the GMQS does not limit the annual growth rate of atTordable housing and lodging facilities, See. 26.470.050. General requirements. 18 B. General requirements: All development applications for growth management review shall comply with the ` following standards. The reviewing body shall approve, approve with conditions or deny an application for growth management review based on the following generally applicable criteria and the review criteria applicable to the specific type of development: 1. Sufficient growth management allotments are available to accommodate the proposed development, pursuant to Subsection 26.470.030.D. Applications for multi-year development allotment, pursuant to Paragraph 26.470.090.1 shall not be required to meet this standard. Sec. 26.470.030 Therefore, the GMQS does not limit the annual growth rate of affordable housing and lodging,facilities, 2. The proposed development is consistent with the Aspen Area Community Plan. This project complies with the Guidelines. 3. The development conforms to the requirements and limitations of the zone district. This project complies with the Guidelines. 4. The proposed development is consistent with the Conceptual Historic Preservation Commission approval, the Conceptual Commercial Design Review approval and the Conceptual Planned Unit Development approval, as applicable. This requirement is not applicable to this project. 5. Unless otherwise specified in this Chapter, sixty percent(60%) of the employees generated by the additional commercial or lodge development, according to Subsection 26.470.100.A, Employee i I � generation rates, are miti through the provision of affordable h ing. The employee generation ®' mitigation plan shall be approved pursuant to Paragraph 26.470.070.4, Affordable housing, at a Category 4 rate as defined in the Aspen/Pitkin County Housing Authority Guidelines, as amended. An ® applicant may choose to provide mitigation units at a lower category designation. if an applicant chooses to use a Certificate of Affordable Housing Credit as mitigation, pursuant to Chapter 26.540, such Certificate shall be extinguished pursuant to Chapter 26.540.90 Criteria for Administrative Extinguishment of the Certificate. (Ord. No. 6—2010, §2) This requirement is not applicable to this project. 6. Affordable housing net livable area, for which the finished floor level is at or above natural or finished ® grade, whichever is higher, shall be provided in an amount equal to at least thirty percent(30%) of the additional free-market residential net livable area, for which the finished floor level is at or above natural or finished grade, whichever is higher. Affordable housing shall be approved pursuant to Paragraph 26.470.070.4, Affordable housing, and be restricted to a Category 4 rate as defined in the Aspen/Pitkin County Housing Authority Guidelines, as amended. An applicant may choose to provide mitigation units at a lower category designation. Affordable housing units that are being provided absent a requirement("voluntary units") may be deed- restricted at any level of affordability, including residential occupied. If an applicant chooses to use a Certificate of Affordable Housing Credit as mitigation, pursuant to Chapter 26.540, such Certificate ® shall be extinguished pursuant to Chapter 26.540.90 Criteria for Administrative Extinguishment of the Certificate, utilizing the calculations in Section 26.470.100 Employee/Square Footage Conversion. (Ord.No. 6—2010, §2) ® This project complies with the Guidelines. The project is all at ground level. 7. The project represents minimal additional demand on public infrastructure, or such additional demand is mitigated through improvement proposed as part of the project. Public infrastructure includes, but is not Limited to, water supply, sewage treatment, energy and communication utilities, drainage control, fire ® and police protection, solid waste disposal, parking and road and transit services. (Ord. No. 14, 2007, §1) This project is an existing building with existing public services which will remain unchanged Affordable Hou`sine R6ietiir(please .endthese°revie9u`criteria f®rh—,Affil&le'Housine Groi th Manaaen eett Revi, ®, Sec. 26.470.070. Minor Planning and Zoning Commission applications. 4. Affordable housing. The development of affordable housing deed-restricted in accordance with the Aspen/Pitkin County Housing Authority Guidelines shall be approved, approved with conditions or denied by the Planning and Zoning Commission based on the following criteria: ® a. The proposed units comply with the Guidelines of the Aspen/Pitkin County Housing Authority. A recommendation from the Aspen/Pitkin County Housing Authority shall be required for this standard. The Aspen/Pitkin County Housing Authority may choose to hold a public hearing with the Board of ® Directors. This project complies with the Guidelines. that a I bedroom Category,l unit should have at least 700.sq.ft. net livable space. �; 1�_I' / —I—L .--' ®' b. Affordable housing required for mitigation purposes shall be in the form of actual newly built units or ® buy-down units. Off-site units shall be provided within the City limits. Units outside the City limits may be accepted as mitigation by the City Council, pursuant to Paragraph 26.470.090.2. If the mitigation S requirement is less than one (1) full unit, a cash-in- lieu payment may be accepted by the Planning and Zoning Commission upon a recommendation from the Aspen/Pitkin County Housing Authority. If the r mitigation requirement is one (1) or more units, a cash-in-lieu payment shall require City Council approval, pursuant to Paragraph 26.470.090.3. A Certificate of Affordable Housing Credit may be used to satisfy mitigation requirements by approval of the Community Development Department Director, pursuant to Section 26.540.080 Extinguishment of the Certificate. Required affordable housing may be provided through a mix of these methods. (Ord. No. 6—2010, §4) ® This requirement is not applicable to this project. c. Each unit provided shall be designed such that the finished floor level of fifty percent(50%) or more of the unit's net livable area is at or above natural or finished grade, whichever is higher. This dimensional requirement may be varied through Special Review, Pursuant to Chapter 26.430. (Ord. No. 14—2011, §3) The project is all at ground level. d. The proposed units shall be deed-restricted as "for sale" units and transferred to qualified purchasers according to the Aspen/Pitkin County Housing Authority Guidelines. The owner may be entitled to select the first purchasers, subject to the aforementioned qualifications, with approval from the Aspen/Pitkin County Housing Authority. The deed restriction shall authorize the Aspen/Pitkin County Housing Authority or the City to own the unit and rent it to qualified renters as defined in the Affordable Housing Guidelines established by the Aspen/Pitkin County Housing Authority, as amended. The proposed units may be rental units, including but not limited to rental units owned by an employer or nonprofit organization, if a legal instrument in a form acceptable to the City Attorney ensures permanent affordability of the units. The City encourages affordable housing units required for lodge development to be rental units associated with the lodge operation and contributing to the long- term viability of the lodge. Units owned by the Aspen/Pitkin County Housing Authority, the City of Aspen, Pitkin County or other similar governmental or quasi-municipal agency shall not be subject to this mandatory "for sale" provision. This requirement is not applicable to this project. e. Non-Mitigation Affordable Housing. Affordable housing units that are not required for mitigation, but ® meet the requirements of Section 26.470.070.4(a-d). The owner of such non-mitigation affordable housing is eligible to receive a Certificate of Affordable Housing Credit pursuant to Chapter 26.540. (Ord. No. 6—2010, §4) This requirement is not applicable to this project. o Steven Buettow Aspen Water Treatment Plant Subdivision REPRESENTATIVE: Jeff Pendarvis, 970.429.2786 OWNER: City of Aspen ® Project Architect; Steven Buettow 970-925-1693 buettow(ED-sopris.net • This project proposes to remodel an existing public facility that is no longer required into a one bedroom affordable housing unit. The building's location, shape, materials and color will not be changed relative to its existing elevation. The present building has 8040 greenline approval. 1. Dear Community Development Director, This project should have a 8040 Greenline review exemption because it has a current approval for its location and building height. The present buildings location, elevation and height will not be changed. Therefore additional review will look at nothing different that what already exists at present. No trees are removed. All exemption criteria listed below are met and we request 8040 review exemption. 8040 Greenline review Exemption Request D. An 8040 Greenline Review applies to any development located at or above 8040 feet above mean seal level. Pursuant to the Land Use Code the proposed conversion of an emergency response building consisting of an ® office, bathroom and garage may meet the exemption criteria. A. 8040 Greenline. Areas located at or above 8040 feet mean sea level(the 8040 Greenline) and including that area O extending one hundred fifty (150) feet below, measured horizontally, the 8040 Greenline. Development in these areas shall be subject to heightened review so as to reduce impacts on the natural watershed and surface runoff, minimize air pollution, reduce the potential for avalanche. ® unstable slope, rockfall and mudslide and aid in the transition of agricultural and forestry land uses to urban uses. Review shall further ensure the availability of utilities and access to any development and that disturbance to existing terrain and natural land features be kept to a minimum. B. Exemption. The Community Development Director may exempt the expansion, remodeling or reconstruction of an existing 8040 Greenline development if the following standards are met: ® 1. The development does not add more than ten percent (10%) to the floor area of the existing structure or increase the total amount of square footage of areas of the structure which are exempt from floor area calculations by more than twenty-five percent(25%); and There is no increase in floor area. 2. The development does not require the removal of any tree for which a permit would be required pursuant to Section 15.04.450 or the applicant receives a permit pursuant to said Section; and i There are no trees removed. • 3. The development is located such that it is not affected by any geologic hazard and will not result in increased erosion and sedimentation. The location is the same and previously approved. 4. All exemptions are cumulative. Once a development reaches the totals specified in Subsection 26.435.030.B.1, an 8040 Greenline review must,be obtained pursuant to Subsection 26.435.030.0. • Steven Buettow Aspen Water Treatment Plant Subdivision REPRESENTATIVE: Jeff Pendarvis, 970.429.2786 OWNER: City of Aspen ® Project Architect; Steven Buettow 970-925-1693 • buettow _sopris.net Aspen/Pitkin County Housing Authority 530 E. Main St. Suite LL Aspen,Colorado 81611-1948 ® 970-920-5050 26.410.040. Residential design standards. E. The project is subject to the residential design standards. Parking standards should be evaluated for the new use. This project responds to these residential design criteria; A. Site Design- existing 1. Building orientation. This is an existing building. It will not be moved. 1♦ 2. Build-to lines. This is an existing building. It will not be moved. 3.Fences. There will be no fences. B. Building Form- existing with small exterior additions to the ex.form 1. Secondary mass. This is a existing one story building. The mass, materials and height stay the same. C. Parking- existing,four spaces available, possible covered carport ® 1. Buildings with an alley or private street access. NA. There is no alley 2. For all residential uses that have access only from a public street,the following standards shall be apply: a. On the street facing facade(s), the width of the living area on the first floor shall be at least five(5) feet greater than the width of the garage or carport. The main building mass 0 is 26 feet. The carport width is11 feet. b. The front facade of the garage or the front-most supporting column of a carport shall be set back at least ten (10) feet further from the street than the front-most wall of the house. The front most street facing column is 1'-S 1/2"behind the unit's front elevation. It can be, if necessary, 10'behind the main building/living room facade. The structure would be less natural, with larger elements and more expensive. c. On lots of at least fifteen thousand(15,000) square feet in size, the garage or carport may ® be forward of the front facade of the house only if the garage doors or carport entry are perpendicular to the street(side-loaded). NA d. When the*or of a garage or carport is above or belohe street level, the driveway cut within the front yard setback shall not exceed two (2) feet in depth, measured from �i natural grade. NA, The Carport is on the same level as the house. e. The vehicular entrance width of a garage or carport shall not be greater than twenty-four w (24) feet. The Carport is 11 feet wide. f. If the garage doors are visible from a public street or alley,then they shall be single-stall ® doors or double-stall doors designed to appear like single-stall doors. NA D. Building Elements-add porch, new windows and covered carport 1. Street oriented entrance and principal window; a. The entry door shall face the street and be no more than ten (10) feet back from the front- most wall of the building. Entry doors shall not be taller than eight (8) feet. The front door faces the street. b. A covered entry porch of fifty (50)or more square feet, with a minimum depth of six(6') feet, shall be part of the front facade. Entry porches and canopies shall not be more than one (1) story in height. There will be a new covered front porch of'50 SF min. and at least 6'in depth. c. A street-facing principal window requires that a significant window or group of windows • face street. The main window will face the street. 2. First story element. The existing building is one story. ).Windows; 0 a. Street-facing windows shall not span through the area where a second floor. The existing building is one story. There will be no multi story window A b. All windows will be square c. No light wells E. Context- humanize corrugated steel building shell with stone terraces, w new covered porch, terrace and wood trim. 1.Materials a. The quality of the exterior materials and details and their application shall be consistent on all sides of the building.all existing sides are the.same. b. Materials shall be used in ways that are true to their characteristics. all materials are the same. c. Highly reflective surfaces shall not be used as exterior materials. all materials are existing. 2.Inflection a.NA, the existing building is one story. RDS; Note items D & E showing that additional positive elements will be added to the building. LA Kx : , 1 X ' ri op 4w I 1p i y� ®�aaY �i�e.�an,rm. .e..... .:m...-.- .u.._..-�_ r.-.- .._._. --..... .w:,w. i......•; ...c.. w..�.m� ^"'^• 'a. a► YJ I�T tl • e a ob � f 99 I i m ---- ..— _ Ail X m 4 O1 v > V J WATER PLACE HOUSING REMODEL MM 9' �zM = m -- 00 z 8 Water Place Subdivision PUD S 3 _ z 2 Aspen,Colorado m i -...swlYtlalt�'vapg,➢�Ieu,�WNw . •'t � � "+1 Vol r �. flh J4 5 �\�P� '�.•._ _. f, m•..w I ..max -.•v.. '...:. ....__ � .Hjw•".I�-+1'I w ' RR 7 w.w.n ,r..nu4.n A� rA• ...:::fAV4s � / / �,r�„nnum,v,....:unv.�•�s.m�""'..+••.a �p` r mY In WATER PLACE HOUSING REMODEL N s r — III m 8 N. o n Wu Water Place Sulxlivision PUD z r Z 3 N u 999 fl m Aspen,Colorado .ten 1 �. � l __•1 _ r 'Poo - / r 1 \ --- --- it COMO= Lor j fII ASt. .� ter" ��... �.. - ' • ; , d - � ® ! C4S7L£ R/OGE � R IRM o a cn.aour •! HOUSING S?£ -- ` "` \ r 1 (—_ \ o,..�mwkSWT VdEP w.&%W — am ® i � i I'� i '_ __ -' / ,,'' � ` / ;��♦ �� i ,� � I ��°tit 1 I 1 elsr � 1 f? I � 71 ® � 1 � ice. i� % 'i' / 1 1 1 ' � moi/'; .'�' / /� _o t\ \ "' z "I+ 1 I •!� L_l �l 7: N .� � �'�� ! in 011 I .0o, _ I . 1 /• \� 1 1I, / / s i �• ��/ Gam/ -I- - � COMMON ® �—• l a d ® moi mov, pe 77 71i �I GRAPHIC SCALE • �h \ . s ., i Itl a / � /• RAW rmv REsavK.w I .i ,i LOT 4 ® 2) \ 1 a rar) %: /: //� 49.4! AC.r I rope. w m / SCHMUESER GORDON MEYER WC. ER .. . v ale er. ..ta Aw. 950jo_ GRADING AND , RM --'S GoRVEYOFM W.eln ea«c adla no R .TREATAlENT PLANT IMPROVEMENTS 1 O GYsnwood Colorado Gem 6/x/96 acmwugmM (070)0+6- oi°"�,uc wa_aa�af AND AFFORDABLE HOUSING PROJECT DRAINAGE' PLAN ® 20M)m haErm Aspari Colorado 10701 026-@727 ,w. JH or mu. VFW I �\ SCALB: I'= 40' \\ GRAPHIC SCALE`- `\ � \`` \ in rn7 \ _ • %/ - L_ --� - Ilene- •a n 1 ` ^` yy ,Q N. f2'GW / J. 7— .s1— � � e LOT 3 "CASTLE R/OC£ f � E�i it 1 / �1 _ `•��\�� a>,oro ACCCOVISLT HOUSING SME :r L - 0 �•aacc ,ew WE �� —r �• -__sem / Y/ /,- � d_ � � I "� 1 / �1's j i. ® 1 `� oz ® /. ® / COMMON - 1 . . erav // % Q / / •, elai4 \ 1 l 1 1 t \ g . . . .. . . . . . .. . . . . . .: a ----- l ir I I SCOLE• r-_ to:tiaaz �// ' �..�`� ----- / / - / '"----------__ 41 _ S>•ACKm I.161.1:_HT144* . ... — , STA 2+50 4 IR aw AI/!7P atszcw I ♦/ // LOT 4ES ® xIa+40 0+60 0+80 1470 // 49.4! AGf ® ' / ' �� 3Ct1MUESER OORDON MEYER NC. � _ _ ® —�G to w s^ It..+;. &*• zoo R TREATMENT PLANT IMPROVEMENTS DOOLITTLE DRIVE °� R� C4 I A d elan**SP�v+. C-Wwado 6"M / / . !�� (07019"-=4 TAX 045-"48) •AND AFFORDABLE HOUSING P120JECT PLAN VIEW °°" 6 is 96 00#WQV arm Aspw% Colorado 19701 926• 727 ; ww- Ar ✓H .I nr I--too, LAW A ANTI k \ t ._ 1 F I 1 , 4 tx.r- :r I 1 Er A Q4 p 111 J 1 I I 161 VIP I � I / �\� I I 4 M I ® • • • • • • • o • • • O • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • 0 0 • i JnO AW irip MAY RHM `k 4 \ jy r\�` • `` / i i l / :. \ / Epi "ti 19 it 1 i ILo� WCN W � \ ter'•\\ \ ` �'' � � 'gyp \ _ - / •.1 L.� /, `C I \ \ Q Cb y+'�.' RAI Eli ka- 14 Ix1p Oro Him \\ \ lool loe • ® ® • e • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • :i • � e • ® • • jt t ilz /_ z .4 4 i e i1'. 4 4.. 9 e ,.�., ' / /�? -ty►•r� _- _ + -� d �d� )..i -- _ - -- .I H t4rf'fii'{ 'rill CD CD -Ila o ., 9 ... I a.�{.Fi::: � -- 3 '�' .d .'A.:e.,�:!.�,1:f;.l�.l.[A•I,A`il�� _- -"/�/ �'P�.'��' ��1-�.�,::::'1:• �_;i - _--___ ____- O N ..�:•e-1!I�:r�,',�t�t•�..�'�,y.'�Kii':� -- In. / 1•.) :1•i.r - �...� a,♦ _ ' . CD \ 'r..►r'r:r.,j.i.. "'_'�k{� CD i Cn 1.....Y ry f...� K 'a "�a Water Place Housing Project 33 r^ N 2.=A = m l ' y U ^C7 ASPEN WATER TREATMENT PLANT03 " n" REMODEL z ~ SUBDIVISION, LOT M ASP-EN.CtIL!":I'tAUO _�- • SEB ARCHITECTS 29 GREY TALON CT. ASPEN,COLORADO 81611 970-9251893 p�9ttpw@BopM.nx1 I Steven BuettOW' e 26' ® 51iz 6'-1" 5'-11" 4" 12'-9" 51n' 11' • — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — Ln I ' \ LZ ° ® N fV F- x` I 11'-21/ T-2" i91/ e 4— CD o I BEUR00I I ® N 514'; 1 '-41/21 4' 7t 51 I I O - 10' S I\ \ I 1 a z • - - - - - – - - - Fn - �— – W tt� In O ~ I = ° • 10' 10" I5' 2" 11' 0 0 co ® c J t. Lu j aC. wa �Z a LU a� Q A S • , 1. Main Level • 1/4"= 1'-0„ 11AI1 LEVEL PLAN • A2.1 • • • N� N A 'TT O O -" -Water Place HousingProject �- 3 fPz mm ^'C7 ASPEN WATER TREATMENT PLANT I A N N =Co �.y REMODEL m m s ° n W SUBDIVISION, LOTH ASPEN,COLORADO • � ® ® w e SEB ARCHITECTS 29 GREY TALON CT. ASPEN,COLORADO • i 87817 vww.drettow.00m • 970-925-1693 I buegpw®soprte.net . } 1� 7i-81j2" iSteven BuettoW EXISTING ROOF NEW DOORS- DK.BROWN CLAD FINISH i • NEW ROOF- A, 12'-10" . EXISTING WALLS I ® 9' 9 i ilNEW WOOD BEAMS- NEW WINDOWS- SIENNA PAINT FINISH--____ DOUBLE PANE 111HI — WITH CLAD FINISH -DARK BROWN EX.CONCRETE FDN&FTG SYSTEM011 o® as as w -4 w w - • • 1 A South Elevation m w a ® c� g Zu IlwTTo °J 17'-a1/2" W .L ~ V OD co (X 01 9 >o w NEW ROOF- EXISTING ROOF 12'-10" 16- za. O N a. W EXISTING WALLS c u Q w 9, 9. 7 OK.BROWN CLAD FINISH NEW WOOD BEAMS- SIENNA PAINT FINISH -- -- NEW WINDOWS- DOUBLE PANE • WITH CLAD FINISH NEW CONCRETE ® -DARK BROWN FDN&FTG SYSTEM • ��...� w 4' ELEVATIONS • • j All 2- D East Elevation z--% 3.1 114"= 1'-0" ------------- • SEB { ARCHITECTS 29 GREY TALCH Cr. ASPEN.CGLGFAGG Btfi11 . L 70-925-1693a even BUettaW NEW ROOF- EXISTING ROOF 9 e I NEW W000 BEA S- � SIENNA PAINT FINISH EXISTING WALLS \ ❑ ❑ NEW WINDOWS- DOUBLE PANE X.CONCRETE WITH CLAD FINISH FON&FTG SYSTEMM�\ RK BROWN O DA 1 B West Elevation 3. 114"= 1'-0" a I c a •� a zILL ' I 2 a - '� NEW ROOl Z C > NEW WINDOWS\ C DOUBLE PANE \ EXISTING ROOF 3 W WITH CLAD FINISH L ZLLI w-- -DARK BROWN a ito uj G Q C �r i 9 NEW WOOD COLUMNS- EXISTING WALLS ol SIENNA PAINT FINISH i NEW CONCRETE FDN&FTG SYSTEM T .... ....... .y 77 ELEVATIONS EXISTING CONCRETE -Q' FDN&FTG SYSTEM j A3.1 ® SEB ARCHI i ECTS 293Rc i 7,ULcrrT. ASPEN, I L C' CT 81611 � w.Kv.buel'ua // \ 970-925-1693 h�enow,aUsc ,w \ 'Steven Buettow ® 9' ®0 - ® 4, ® I 1 A-A Cross Section a.1 1/4"= 1,-0, — U CLU O L EXISTING.ROOF �\ C NEW ROOF- Z ' Q LLI F EXISTING TRUSSES \ 12'-4!/e" w 1 Lu Z NEW DOORS- U OK.BROWN p 91 CLAD FI ISH 9' Q J to _ NEW WOOD BEAMS- w SIENNA PAINT FINISH +-.. p• ;U EXISTING WALLS Q z N LLI NEW WINDOWS- < DOUBLE PANE . WITH CLAD FINISH i -DARK BROWN CONCRETE FO ®® ®® FON 8 FTG SYSTEM ® �0 -4, CROSS SECTIONS A-A & B-B ® z B-B Cross Section '– ' '•'• —j r A4.1 �1 • • • Steven Buettow Architect h • • Aspen Water Treatment Plant Subdivision REPRESENTATIVE: Jeff Pendarvis, 970.429.2786 OWNER: City of Aspen • Project Architect; Steven Buettow 970-925-1693 • buettow(a)sopris.net ® Remodel existing CITY OF ASPEN, Water Place emergency chemical treatment building into Affordable Housing. TYPE OF APPLICATION: SPA Amendment, Growth Management Reviews • PLANNER: Claude Salter, 970.429.2752 To apply, submit the following information 1. Total Deposit for review of application. ® [, 2. Pre-application Conference Summary. ® 3. Applicant's name, address and telephone number, contained within a letter signed by the applicant • stating the name, address, and telephone number of the representative authorized to act on behalf of the applicant. • Street address and legal description of the parcel on which development is proposed to occur, consisting of a current certificate from a title insurance company, or attorney licensed to practice in the State of Colorado, listing the names of all owners of the property, and all mortgages,judgments, liens, easements, contracts and agreements affecting the parcel, and demonstrating the owner's right to apply • for the Development Application. • N E44. Completed Land Use application and signed fee agreement. • 1 5. Proof of ownership 7 6. A written description of the proposal and a written explanation of how a proposed development • complies with the review standards relevant to the development application 0 7. Existing photographs of the site. • 8. An 8 1/2" x 11" vicinity map locating the subject parcels within the City of Aspen. . 0 9. A site plan depicting the proposed layout and the project's physical relationship to the land and its surroundings. • 0. Existing site improvement survey including topography and vegetation showing the current status of \the parcel certified by a registered land surveyor, licensed in the State of Colorado. And a 8 1/2" x 11" vicinity map locating the subject parcels within the City of Aspen. • • = 1 1. Dimensional drawings (to scale) of the proposed work, including elevations that display existing and proposed structure height measured from grade. 0 12. Two copies of the Land Use Application and all additional letters, maps, and agreements. DESCRIPTION: . The City of Aspen Asset Department is interested in changing the use of a building located in the Water Plant • Affordable Housing SPA (Specially Planned Area). The building is currently used for potential chlorine disaster preparedness. The Asset Department would to change the building into a studio or one bedroom affordable housing unit. The emergency response building is (approximately 550 sq ft) comprised of an office, bathroom and attached parking. It is a one story building located at the south end of the affordable housing parking lot of ® Water Plant Affordable Housing (Doolittle Drive, Lot 3). Ordinance No. 23 (1996)established the Water Treatment Plant and Affordable Housing Project which consisted of • 23 deed restricted affordable housing units. The development was created to house City employees, including emergency response personnel, adjacent to the City's water treatment and distribution facilities (Lot 4). The emergency response building is not discussed in Ordinance No. 23 (1996) nor is conversion of it to a ® residential unit. It does appear on the Water Treatment Plant & Affordable Housing Project SPA and Subdivision Final Plat sheet C8, C15,Al and Al2. A project of this nature would require an amendment to the Water Plant Affordable Housing SPA. It would not ® qualify as an insubstantial amendment because the project requires a variation from the SPA's original approvals. The process to amend the SPA requires a review and recommendation from the Planning and Zoning Commission. • City Council will need to grant final approval. The project would require a Growth Management review for the Change in Use , changing an essential public facility into affordable housing and the development of Affordable Housing. The Planning and Zoning Commission ® grants final approval on these two reviews. An 8040 Greenline Review applies to any development located at or above 8040 feet above mean seal level. ® Pursuant to the Land Use Code the proposed conversion of an emergency response building consisting of an office, bathroom and garage may meet the exemption criteria. The applicant shall submit a letter to the . Community Development Director, list of how the project meets the exemption criteria and have a signature block for pending approval of the Com Dev Director. The letter may also include exhibits to better illustrate ® how the project meets the exemptions. ® The project is subject to the residential design standards. Parking standards should be evaluated for the new use. ® Staff is requiring a land use application to ensure the correct land use process is handled before work is begun. The ® review will include the Planning and Zoning Commission, and City Council and public noticing is required. Below is a link to the Land Use application form and the Land Use Code for your convenience. Land Use Application: • • Land Use Review Fee Policy • The City of Aspen has established a review fee policy for the processing of land use applications. A flat fee or deposit is ® collected for land use applications based on the type of application submitted. • A flat fee is collected by Community Development for applications which normally take a minimal and predictable amount of staff time to process. Review fees for other City departments reviewing the application (referral departments) will also be collected when necessary. Flat fees are cumulative—meaning an application with multiple flat fees must pay the sum of those flat fees. Flat fees are not refundable. ® A review fee deposit is collected by Community Development when more extensive staff review is required. Actual staff time spent will be charged against the deposit. Various City staff may also charge their time spent on the case in addition • to the case planner. Deposit amounts may be reduced if, in the opinion of the Community Development Director, the project is expected to take significantly less time to process than the deposit indicates. A determination on the deposit amount shall be made during the pre-application conference by the case planner. Hourly billing shall still apply. • All applications must include an Agreement to Pay Application Fees. One payment including the deposit for Planning and referral agency fees must be submitted with each land use application, made payable to the City of Aspen. Applications will not be accepted for processing without the required application fee. The Community Development Department shall keep an accurate record of the actual time required for the processing of a land use application requiring a deposit. The City can provide a summary report of fees due at the applicants request. The applicant will be billed for the additional costs incurred by the City when the processing of an application by the Community Development Department takes more time or expense than is covered by the deposit. Any direct costs attributable to a project review shall be billed to the applicant with no additional administrative charge. In the event the processing of an application takes less time than provided for by the deposit, the department shall refund the unused portion of the deposited fee to the applicant. Fees shall be due regardless of whether an applicant receives approval. • Unless otherwise combined by the Director for simplicity of billing, all applications for conceptual, final, and recordation of approval documents shall be handled as individual cases for the purposes of billing. Upon conceptual approval all billing shall be reconciled and all past due invoices shall be paid prior to the Director accepting an application for final review. • Final review shall require a new deposit at the rate in effect at the time of final application submission. Upon final approval all billing shall again be reconciled prior to the Director accepting an application for review of technical documents for recordation. ® The Community Development Director may cease processing of a land use application for which an unpaid invoice is 30 or more days past due. Unpaid invoices of 90 or more days past due may be assessed a late fee of 1.75% per month. An unpaid invoice of 120 days or more may be subject to additional actions as may be assigned by the Municipal Court Judge. All payment information is public domain. All invoices shall be paid prior to issuance of a Development Order or recordation of development agreements and plats. The City will not accept a building permit for a property until all invoices are paid in full. For permits already accepted, an ® unpaid invoice of 90 or more days may result in cessation of building permit processing or issuance of a stop work order until full payment is made. The property owner of record is the party responsible for payment of all costs associated with a land use application for the property. Any secondary agreement between a property owner and an applicant representing the owner (e.g. a O contract purchaser) regarding payment of fees is solely between those private parties. Agreement t® Pay Applicata®n Fees � Anagreement between the City of Aspen ("City")and • Property f { Phone No.: � • Owner("I"): i" ly av- f� l Email: l Address of y Billing Address: • Property: 'I 9� g P rty: (send bills ® (subject of �' '�"�` here) application) 1 understand that the City has adopted, via Ordinance No. , Series of 2011, review fees for Land Use applications and the payment of these fees is a condition precedent to determining application completeness. I understand that as the property • owner that I am responsible for paying all fees for this development application. For flat fees and referral fees: I agree to pay the following fees for the services indicated. I understand that these flat fees are non-refundable. S $ flat fee for $ flat fee for $1.575 flat fee for Housing Dept Referral. $ flat fee for a For deposit cases only: The City and I understand that because of the size, nature or scope of the proposed project, it is enot possible at this time to know the full extent or total costs involved in processing the application. I understand that additional costs over and above the deposit may accrue. I understand and agree that it is impracticable for City staff to complete processing, review, and presentation of sufficient information to enable legally required findings to be made for ® project consideration, unless invoices are paid in full. The City and I understand and agree that invoices mailed by the City to the above listed billing address and not returned ito the City shall be considered by the City as being received by me. I agree to remit payment within 30 days of presentation of an invoice by the City for such services. • 1 have read, understood, and agree to the Land Use Review Fee Policy including consequences for non-payment I agree to pay the following initial deposit amounts for the specified hours of staff time. I understand that payment of a deposit does not render an application complete or compliant with approval criteria. If actual recorded costs exceed the initial deposit, I agree to pay additional monthly billings to the City to reimburse the City for the processing of my application at the hourly rates hereinafter stated. $10,080 deposit for 32 hours of Community Development Department staff time. Additional time above the deposit ® amount will be billed at$315 per hour. $265 deposit for 1 hours of Engineering Department staff time. Additional time above the deposit amount will be billed at $265 per hour. City of Aspen: Property Ow er: G o A- ® Chris Bendon Community Development Director Name: _I E r/' F Qd lS City Use: Title: T{,��trP i Y 1/ (►�1.��ti 1� Fees Due: $11,920 Received:$ ATTACHMENT 2—LAPID USE APPLICATION •, PROJECT: Name: y4c L 'Y ( l.l�' l� r✓ �. Location: 0 -v—;o t–, Indicate street address, lot&block number, legal description where appropriate) Parcel ID# RE UIRED APPLICANT: Name: i Address: ® Phone#: ® REPRESENTATIVE: Name: :-� -'(�✓i'!'� L�, , ��v Address: t- ® Phone#: � TYPE OF APPLICATION:(please check all that apply). ❑ GMQS Exemption ❑ Conceptual PUD ❑ Temporary Use GMQS Allotment ❑ Final PUD(& PUD Amendment) ❑ Text/Map Amendment ❑ Special Review ❑ Subdivision ❑ Conceptual SPA ESA–8040 Greenline,Stream ❑ Subdivision Exemption(includes ❑ Final SPA(&SPA Margin,Hallam Lake Bluff, condominiumization) Amendment) �. Mountain View Plane ❑ Commercial Design Review ❑ Lot Split ❑ Small Lodge Conversion/ Expansion ❑ Residential Design Variance ❑ Lot Line Adjustment ❑ Other: ❑ Conditional Use EXISTING CONDITIONS: description of existing buildings,uses,previous approvals, �e�tc. % l NA R ` PROPOSAL: (description of proposed buildings,uses,modifications,etc. Hav you attached the following? FEE§DUE:S Pre-Application Conference Summary ® Attachment#1,Signed Fee Agreement Response to Attachment#3,Dimensional Requirements Form l.Response to Attachment#4,Submittal Requirements-Including Written Responses to Review Standards 3-D Model for large project e All plans that are larger than 8.5"X l i"must be folded. A disk with an electric copy of all written text (Microsoft Word Format)must be submitted as part of the application. Large scale projects should include an ® electronic 3-D model. Your pre-application conference summary will'indicate if you must submit a 3-D model. ATTACHMENT 3 DIMENSIONAL REQUIREMENTS FORM Project: P Applicant: r-k f?n 6f:2-- Location: f:2--Location: Q go•o t.% tn,�r-, 101i Zone District: L2. I 3 P L4 r7 ;. P A- Lot Size: Lot Area: O (for the purposes of calculating Floor Area, Lot Area may be reduced for areas within the high water mark,easements,and steep slopes. Please refer to the definition of Lot Area in the Municipal Code.) Commercial net leasable: Existing: rV Proposed.• Number of residential units: Existing: tai Proposed. 5ti K.. Number of bedrooms: Existing: `✓�- Proposed. Iv _ • Proposed%of demolition (Historic properties only): DiMENSiONS: Floor Area: Existing: S Allowable: Proposed: r"E 2 �- Principal bldg. height: Existing: 4/ �� Allowable: Proposed: { { �$ !� Access. bldg.height: Existing: ty/t _ Allowable: Proposed. On-Site parking: Existing:—-4— Required.- Proposed.• ® % Site coverage: Existing: Required: Proposed: %Open Space: Existing: Required: Proposed: Front Setback: Existing: Required. Proposed. Rear Setback: Existing: Required.• Proposed. ® Combined F/R: Existing: Required: Proposed. Side Setback: Existing: Required.• Proposed: Side Setback: Existing: Required: Proposed: Combined Sides: Existing: Required.• Proposed. Distance Between Existing Required.• Proposed.• Buildings Existing non-conformities or encroachments: Np r, Variations requested: �'` ' ®. THE CITY or, ASPEN Community Development Department Internal Funds Transfer Date: ® Department: Amount Requested: Account Number: kasw, Permit Number: F- 0 0 Permit Address: • Permit Description: — ��r-- & � / w 0, Requested By: 0 0 Received By: 0' 0 0 r 0 i • 0 • 0 0 AFFIDAVIT OF PUBLIC NOTICE REQUIRED BY SECTION 26.304.060 (E), ASPEN LAND USE CODE ADDRESS OF PROPERTY: f100 ND t i7TI.E bK , Aspen, CO SCHEDULED PUBLIC HEARING DATE: p 2 STATE OF COLORADO ) ss. County of Pitkin ) 1, �EFF PgW A (name, please print) being or representing an Applicant to the City of Aspen, Colorado, hereby personally certify that I have complied with the public notice requirements of Section 26.304.060 (E) of the Aspen Land Use Code in the following manner: ✓Publication of notice: By the publication in the legal notice section of an official .paper or a paper of general circulation in the City of Aspen at least fifteen (15) days prior to the public hearing. A copy of the publication is attached hereto. V Posting of notice: By posting of notice, which form was obtained from the Community Development Department, which was made of suitable,-waterproof materials, which was not less than twenty-two (22) inches-wi -six (26) inches high, and which was composed of letters not'1 Q®no_ height. Said notice was posted at least fifteen (15) days o ng and was continuously visible from the day of , 200 ,- 0 and including the date and time of the public hearing. 1phjtograph of the*gusted notice (sign) is attached hereto. MJ ailing of notice. By the mailing of a notice obtained from Development Department, which contains the informati�or�-descrilie _, ;ect 11 26.304.060(E)(2) of the Aspen Land Use Code. At least fifteen (15) days prior 10 the public hearing,notice was hand delivered or mailed by first class postage prepaid U.S. mail to all owners of property within three hundred (300) feet of the property subject to the development application. The names and addresses of property owners shall be those on the current tax records of Pitkin County as they appeared no more than sixty(60) days prior to the date of the public hearing. A copy of the owners and governmental agencies so noticed is attached hereto. (continued on next page) ANDERSON TIM BARNETT FORREST S CHRISTIAN RONALD E&JOY R 11 E WATER PLACE PO BOX 1872 18 W WATER PLACE ASPEN, CO 81611 ASPEN, CO 81612 ASPEN, CO 81611 CROOK ROBERT B DAVIS DANIEL L&BRENDA L FABROCINI ROBERT, 7 E WATER PLACE 3 E WATER PLACE 13 E WATER PL ASPEN, CO 81611 ASPEN, CO 81611 ASPEN, CO 816113118 FOREMAN SARAJANE MARGARET GOLDSBOROUGH NEAL HAGERTY KEVIN JOHN&ELIZABETH B 21 W WATER PL 4 E WATER PLACE 15 E WATER PLACE ASPEN, CO 81611 ASPEN, CO 81611 ASPEN, CO 81611 HORNBACHER DAVID KELLY KATHLEEN LATHROP JACQUELINE SUE 1/2 5 E WATER PLACE 8 E WATER PL 4340 JORDAN DR ASPEN, CO 81611 ASPEN, CO 81611 MC FARLAND,WI 53558 LINN WILLIAM&NATASHA LOUDON ADAM W MACAYEAL IAN 1/2 19 W WATER PLACE 17 E WATER PL 6 E WATER PL ASPEN, CO 81611 ASPEN, CO 81611 ASPEN, CO 81611 MAGNUSON RICK MENDOZA MARTIN&OLGA PRYOR RICHARD&PHILIPPA ANNE 10 E WATER PLACE 14 E WATER PLACE 455 DOOLITTLE DR ASPEN, CO 81611 ASPEN, CO 81611 ASPEN, CO 81611 READY RANDY&CHERYL SMITH ASHTON TRICE TRACEY MICHAEL DAVID C/O CITY OF ASPEN 2 EAST WATER PL 21 W WATER PL 130 S GALENA ST ASPEN, CO 81611 ASPEN, CO 81611 ASPEN, CO 81611 VAUGHAN MATT WATER PLACE HOMEOWNERS WILLIAMS CHANCE 8 E WATER PL ASSOCIATION C/O CITY ATTORNEY 1 E WATER PL ASPEN, CO 81611 130 S GALENA ST ASPEN, CO 81611 ASPEN, CO 81611 WILSON WINDELL R &ANNA 12 E WATER PLACE ASPEN, CO 81611 PUBLIC NOTICE RE: 500 Doolittle Drive, SPA AMENDMENT, GROWTH MANAGEMENT, 8040 GREENLINE,AND RESIDENTIAL DESIGN VARIANCE LAND USE REVIEWS NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that .a public hearing will be held on Tuesday, May 15, 2012, at a meeting to begin at 4:30 p.m. before the Aspen Planning and Zoning Commission, in the Sister Cities meeting room, City Hall, 130 S. Galena Street,Aspen, CO, to review the proposal submitted by Jeff Pendarvis of the City of Aspen Asset Department, Aspen, CO 81611, for the property commonly known as 500 Doolittle Drive, and legally described as Lot 25, Water Plant Affordable Housing. Applicant seeks to convert the existing emergency response building, which is no longer in use,to a one-bedroom deed restricted for-sale affordable housing unit. In order to gain approval for the development proposal, Applicant seeks a recommendation of approval from the Planning and Zoning Commission for an Amendment to the Water Plant Affordable Housing SPA, and Growth Management approval for the Change in Use, changing an essential public facility into affordable housing, and the development of Affordable Housing. Applicant further seeks residential design variance from the Planning and Zoning Commission for building street orientation, a reduction in size for the covered entry porch, the presence of a • significant group of windows.that face the street,and lastly an exemption from 8040 Greenline review, as the building is already established and has previously successfully undergone this review. For further information, contact Sara Nadolny at the City of Aspen Community Development Department, 130 S. Galena St., Aspen, 'CO, (970) 429.2739, Sara.Nadolny@ci.aspen.co.us. S/LJ Erspamer, Chair Aspen Planning and Zoning Commission U85LIC s te: May 15, 2012 _ reviews. For further information: I, Time: 4:30 pm contact the City of Aspen Community Development Dept. at Place: City Hall, 130 S. Galena St 970-429-2739. E Sister Cities Room ose: he�Cit roof Aspen, 130 S. Galena St pen COL as owner of this r ro ert is_proposinq to convert an existing office building to an _ and will-.,-"o affordable housing unit, appear before the Planning & Zonin Commission on t aforementioned — -- date and time. z d use reviews will include SPA Amendment, Growth Management 40 Greenline, and _ -_ Residential D ' n Variances ------------------- -------- -------- ------------------- — -- e SEB l I , .�, ARCHITECTS WDV?GRMW Q - � `'�• 29 GREY TALON CT. , ASPEN,COLORADO 81611 • l 970.9.25-1693 4 to wwbuettow.wm j � c� + Steven Buettow ww ` ®� 12 EXCELLENCE, \ `J AFTERALL: 13 alp 15 o e 1 / ' �• W 6000 17 z z i U) o D s O N - W to cu Q W i e Site Plan ego ! L. • FAU � OJT'pgHib� • AFFIDAVIT OF PUBLIC NOTICE REQUIRED BY SECTION 26.304.060 (E),ASPEN LAND USE CODE ADDRESS OF PROPERTY: ll A�, Aspen, CO SCHEDULED PUBLIC HEARING DATE: STATE OF COLORADO ) ,ss. County of Pitkin ) 1 —VIC (name, please print) being or representing an Applicant to the City of Aspen,.Colorado, hereby personally. certify that 1 have complied with the public notice requirements of Section 26.304.060 (E) of the Aspen Land Use Code in the following manner: Publication of notice: By the publication in the legal notice section of an official ,,paper or a paper of general circulation in the City of Aspen at least fifteen (15) days prior to the public hearing. A copy of the publication is attached hereto. J. Posting of notice: By posting of notice, which form was obtained from the Community Development Department, which was made of suitable, waterproof materials, which was not less than twenty-two. (22) inches wide and twenty-six =_ (26) inches high, and which was composed of letters not less than one inch in height. Said notice was posted at least fifteen (15) days prior to the public hearing and was continuously visible from the day of , 20_, to and including the date and time of the public hearing. A photograph of the posted notice (sign) is attached hereto. Mailing of notice. By the mailing of a notice obtained from the Community Development Department, which contains the information described in Section 26.304.060(E)(2) of the Aspen Land Use Code. At least fifteen (15) days prior to the public hearing, notice was hand delivered or mailed by first class postage prepaid U.S. mail to all owners of property within three hundred (300) feet of the property subject to the development application. The names and addresses of property owners shall be those on the current tax records of Pitkin County as they appeared no more than sixty (60) days prior to the date of the public hearing. A copy of the owners and governmental agencies so noticed is attached hereto. (Continued on next page) h Rezoning or text amendment: Whenever the official zoning district map is in any way to be changed or amended incidental to or as part of a general revision of this Title, or whenever the text of this Title is to be amended, whether such revision be made by repeal of this Title and enactment of a new land use regulation, or otherwise, the requirement of an accurate survey map or other sufficient legal description of, and the notice to and listing of names and addresses of owners of real property in the area of the proposed change shall be waived. However, the proposed zoning map shall be available for public inspection in the planning agency during-all business hours for fifteen(15) days prior to the public hearing on such amendments. 4. Signature The foregoing "Affidavit of Notice" was acknowledged before me this 97day of , 20L2-, by 24Z S WITNESS MY HAND AND OFFICIAL SEAL PUBLI 0 ITTLE DRIVE L RE: MENT,GROWTH MANAGEMENT, SIR 8040 AME"E_FaLAND'USEREVEWSSIDENTIALDESIGN My commission expires: VARIANC.wy public hearing E-`-'- NOTICE Iat- S HEREBY GIVEN that 2012 atear p an- will be held^at 4:30 p mMbe°ent�he e A S el,Cities in9 10 beg Commission, �- ning and rZO°omn8lty Ha11,130 S.Galena Street,jefl As- meeung to review ,,'proposal subm�tle artment, Notary Pu llc pen,CO, Cit °f Aspen Aseet commonly PendarviCs0 81611,for the Pre oPand legally de Aspen, as 500 Doolittle DnvA emergency Water rt he existing glemerg Housing- s as Lot 25, convert longer m use,to a Applicant building,to which is no onebedroom deed restnoted for-sale affordable housing unit. � 6 a sapnioui OOZZ9 P29Z p9£ `u'', _ aseal 543uoW 9 a sluanj Usrl as aael�ee aauiwn5 ATTACHMENTS AS APPLICABLE: 9LLS-6L£-OL6 UBLICATION ow/oo6s'01 a solo IF THE POSTED NOTICE (SIGN) 6 o P `s n q °Rzoa AJOA .UU3 UaL l�M`s111H pUV110H iNERS AND GOVERNMENT AGENGIES NOTIED sstap ul jUaU11aE tV DipnjS �� 646LRJ� I ICICATION OF MINERAL ESTATE OWNERS NOTICE Ly 3g ASPEN TIMES W EEK `I C.R.S. §24-65.5-103.3 �� ` `_�_`�J � `_:1 .'-.��i, .-._`�� .�• .A r" _'\ � f L �.` l Jim '_ _ 1 IKRZ 4 I r s � t 0 IT f w IM I _ • � i� 11MIN nw:i� MEIN Agreement t® Pay ApplicationFees Anagreement between the City of Aspen ("City")and Property ✓ Phone No.: .y r Owner(„P) _ 'j Email: t " Address of / � �- -- Billing Address: t Property: ' N send bills (subject of 51 here) application) I understand that the City has adopted, via Ordinance No. , Series of 2011, review fees for Land Use applications and the payment of these fees is a condition precedent to determining application completeness. I understand that as the property owner that I am responsible for paying all fees for this development application. - For flat fees and referral fees: I agree to pay the following fees for the services indicated. I understand that these flat fees are non-refundable. $ flat fee for $ flat fee for $1.575 flat fee for Housing Dept Referral. $ flat fee for For deposit cases only: The City and I understand that because of the size, nature or scope of the proposed project, it is not possible at this time to know the full extent or total costs involved in processing the application. I understand that additional costs over and above the deposit may accrue. I understand and agree that it is impracticable for City staff to complete processing, review, and presentation of sufficient information to enable legally required findings to be made for project consideration, unless invoices are paid in full The City and I understand and agree that invoices mailed by the City to the above listed billing address and not returned to the City shall be considered by the City as being received by me. I agree to remit payment within 30 days of presentation of an invoice by the City for such services. I have read, understood, and agree to the Land Use Review Fee Policy including consequences for non-payment. I agree to pay the following initial deposit amounts for the specified hours of staff time. I understand that payment of a deposit does not render an application complete or compliant with approval criteria. If actual recorded costs exceed the initial deposit, I agree to pay additional monthly billings to the City to reimburse the City for the processing of my application at the hourly rates hereinafter stated. $10,080 deposit for 32 hours of Community Development Department staff time. Additional time above the deposit amount will be billed at$315 per hour. 265 deposit for 1 hours of Engineering Department staff time. Additional time above the deposit amount will be billed at $265 per hour. City of Aspen: Property Ow er: G A- Z LLJ � _ Lu � �. o cii COo Chris Bendon _ ,L WW Community Development Director Name: : E I'F &,Jh4XVLS �, p City Use: Title: � � z,4� Y Ui Fees Due: $11,920 Received: $ U C • RECEIVEV nEC 1.5 2011 ATTACHMENT 2—LAND USE APPLICATION CITY OF ASPEN PROJECT: COWUN �#' Name: +Ac - Location: Indicate street address,lot&block number,legal description where appropriate Parcel ID# UIRED APPLICANT: Name: V t"l Address: Phone#: REPRESENTATIVE: Name: Address: Phone#: TYPE OF APPLICATION:(please check all that apply): ❑ GMQS Exemption ❑ Conceptual PUD ❑ Temporary Use Z GMQS Allotment ❑ Final PUD(&PUD Amendment) ❑ Text/Map Amendment ❑ Special Review ❑ Subdivision ❑ Conceptual SPA ESA—8040 Greenline,Stream ❑ Subdivision Exemption(includes ❑ Final SPA(&SPA Margin,Hallam Lake Bluff, condominiumization) Amendment) Mountain View Plane ❑ Commercial Design Review ❑ Lot Split ❑ Small Lodge Conversion/ Expansion ❑ Residential Design Variance ❑ Lot Line Adjustment ❑ Other: ❑ Conditional Use EXISTING CONDITIONS: (description of existing buildings,uses,previous approvals,etc. PROPOSAL:p(description of proposed buildings,uses,modificationsp etc. Hav you attached the following? FEE DuE:$ Pre-Application Conference Summary Attachment#1,Signed Fee Agreement Response to Attachment#3,Dimensional Requirements Form Response to Attachment#4,Submittal Requirements-Including Written Responses to Review Standards ❑ 3-D Model for large project All plans that are larger than 8.5"X 11"must be folded. A disk with an electric copy of all written text (Microsoft Word Format)must be submitted as part of the application. Large scale projects should include an electronic 3-D model. Your pre-application conference summary will indicate if you most submit a 3-D model. RECE IVED ATTACHMENT DEC 15 2011 DIMENSIONAL REQUIREMENTS FORM CITY OF ASPEN COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT Project: Applicant: C � ' Location: d ► Ltfl 1�� ,t �'+ t +J d s t� * =� Zone District: jL2= 1 c3 p L4 t °', Lot Size: Lot Area: (for the purposes of calculating Floor Area,Lot Area may be reduced for areas within the high water mark,easements,and steep slopes.Please refer to the definition of Lot Area in the Municipal Code.) Commercial net leasable: Existing: _Proposed.• Number of residential units: Existing: r-, Proposed.• Number of bedrooms: Existing: —Propose& ev tv Proposed%of demolition(Historic properties only): D1MENSIONS: Floor Area: Existing: Allowable: Proposed Principal bldg.height: Existing: 1. �ko � Allowable: Proposed. t Access.bldg.height: Existing: !'r Allowable: Proposed: On-Site parking: Existing: Required.• Proposed: %Site coverage: Existing: Required: Proposed: %Open Space: Existing: Required: Proposed: Front Setback: Existing: Required- Proposed: Rear Setback: Existing: Required: Proposed.• Combined F/R: Existing: Required. Proposed: Side Setback: Existing: Required: Proposed: Side Setback: Existing: Required.• Proposed: Combined Sides: Existing: Required: Proposed: Distance Between Existing Required: Proposed.• Buildings Existing non-conformities or encroachments: Variations requested: s' .. T ` RECFM DEC CITY OF ASPEN THE OTY or-ASPEN Community Development Department Internal Funds Transfer Date: Department: Amount Requested: Account Number: Permit Number: 0Gq g• Zb( � � Permit Address: p ��- Permit Description: 5 CA —�� T4t,�l� � N,; Requested By: Received By: ��i1 CITY OF ASPEN t y .1 e r Permit Receipt T EC H-N O LOG I ES RECEIPT NUMBER 00030898 Account Number: 25227 Date: 12/15/2011 Applicant: CITY OF ASPEN WATER DEPT Type: core #505.94.94413.86001 Permit Number Fee Description Amount 0078.2011.ASLU Planning Hourly Fees 10,080.00 0078.2011.ASLU Eng Referral Fee 265.00 0078.2011.ASLU Housing Referral Fee 1,575.00 Total: $11,920.00