Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutagenda.hpc.20150211 AGENDA ASPEN HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION REGULAR MEETING February 11, 2015 5:00 PM City Council Meeting Room 130 S. Galena St. 130 S Galena Street, Aspen I. SITE VISITS II. INTRODUCTION (15 MIN.) A. Roll call B. Approval of minutes C. Public Comments D. Commissioner member comments E. Disclosure of conflict of interest (actual and apparent) F. Project Monitoring G. Staff comments H. Certificate of No Negative Effect issued I. Submit public notice for agenda items III. NEW BUSINESS A. HPC input on pending code amendment regarding limitations on variations to Land Use Code requirements (5:10) B. 110 E. Bleeker Street- Conceptual Major Development, Demolition And Variances, Continue Public Hearing To March 11th C. Lot 2, 202 N. Monarch Street Subdivision- Final Major Development, PUBLIC HEARING (5:25) D. 232 East Bleeker- Final Major Development, PUBLIC HEARING (5:45) IV. OLD BUSINESS A. 530 W. Hallam Street- Conceptual Major Development, On-Site Relocation, Historic Landmark Lot Split And Variances, PUBLIC HEARING CONTINUED FROM JANUARY 28TH (6:45) V. ADJOURN Next Resolution Number: Resolution #6, 2015 TYPICAL PROCEEDING- 1 HOUR, 10 MINUTES FOR MAJOR AGENDA ITEM, NEW BUSINESS Provide proof of legal notice (affidavit of notice for PH) Staff presentation ( 5 minutes ) Board questions and clarifications ( 5 minutes ) Applicant presentation ( 20 minutes ) Board questions and clarifications ( 5 minutes ) Public comments (close public comment portion of hearing) ( 5 minutes ) Applicant Rebuttal Chairperson identified the issues to be discussed (5 minutes ) HPC discussion ( 15 minutes ) Motion ( 5 minutes ) *Make sure the motion includes what criteria are met or not met. No meeting of the HPC shall be called to order without a quorum consisting of at least four (4) members being present. No meeting at which less than a quorum shall be present shall conduct any business other than to continue the agenda items to a date certain. All actions shall require the concurring vote of a simple majority, but in no event less than three (3) concurring votes of the members of the commission then present and voting. C:\Program Files (x86)\Neevia.Com\Document Converter\temp\6301.doc 2/4/2015 HPC PROJECT MONITORS- projects in bold are under construction Nora Berko 332 W. Main 1102 Waters 1006 E. Cooper 100 E. Main 417/421 W. Hallam 602 E. Hyman ________________________________________________________________________________________________ Bob Blaich ________________________________________________________________________________________________ Jim DeFrancia 435 W. Main, AJCC 420 E. Cooper 420 E. Hyman 407 E. Hyman Rubey Park Sallie Golden 206 Lake 114 Neale 514 E . Hyman 212 Lake 400 E. Hyman 517 E. Hyman (Little Annie’s) Hotel Aspen Gretchen Greenwood 28 Smuggler Grove ________________________________________________________________________________________________ Willis Pember 204 S. Galena Aspen Core 514 E. Hyman 120 Red Mountain 233 W. Hallam 101 E. Hallam 407 E. Hyman Patrick Segal 204 S. Galena 623 E. Hopkins 701 N. Third 612 W. Main 206 Lake 212 Lake Holden Marolt derrick John Whipple Aspen Core 201 E. Hyman 549 Race 208 E. Main 420 E. Cooper 602 E. Hyman Hotel Aspen 610 E. Hyman 301 Lake P1 II.F. Limitations on Variations to Land Use Requirements – HPC Check-In Page 1 of 2 MEMORANDUM TO: Aspen Historic Preservation Commission FROM: Chris Bendon, Community Development Director Jessica Garrow, Long Range Planner RE: Code Amendment Check-in: Limitations on Variations to Land Use Code Requirements MEETING DATE: February 11, 2015 SUMMARY : The Historic Preservation Commission is asked to provide feedback on a proposed code amendment to establish limitations on what variations may be requested by a Land Use Applicant, and establish thresholds for when dimensional and other variations trigger a public vote (referendum). BACKGROUND : This code amendment focuses on creating additional clarity and predictability in the land use review process. Currently, properties over 27,000 sq ft (and smaller properties after receiving authorization from the Community Development Director) may request a Planned Development to establish dimensions that exceed those of the underlying zone district. An Applicant may request any dimension through this process. Some Applicants have requested reductions in affordable housing requirements through Growth Management or through a Planned Development. In addition, property owners interested in designating their property through the AspenModern program sometimes request reductions in affordable housing and parking requirements, as well as increases in height and floor area, in exchange for designating their property. Over the past few months, there have been a number of community members who have expressed concern regarding the magnitude of variations that are being requested. They have argued that dimensional variations, in particular, should be subject to a public vote (referendum) or simply not allowed. City Council has expressed a desire to examine the issue, and find code language that would continue to allow some flexibility for properties, while allowing a greater public say in projects that have more significant variations. A copy of their approved Policy Resolution is attached as Exhibit A. OVERVIEW: Staff proposes a code amendment that would establish an upper limit on the amount of dimensional variation, particularly for Height and Floor Area, that can be requested through a Planned Development process. City Council would continue to be the final review authority for Planned Developments that change dimensions. In addition, staff proposes that if an Applicant requests and City Council approves dimensional variations beyond the established limits, it would trigger an automatic public vote at the next regularly scheduled election. P2 III.A. Limitations on Variations to Land Use Requirements – HPC Check-In Page 2 of 2 Alternatively, Council could prohibit dimensional variations through a Planned Development, and require any dimensional variations be processed as a code amendment for the entire zone district. Staff believes that some ability to vary dimensions due to site specific constraints should remain in the code and would not recommend entirely eliminating that option at this time. Some Land Use Applicants have requested reductions in affordable housing mitigation requirements as part of their land use application. Staff proposes that this code amendment include language that would allow a certain percentage reduction be approved by City Council, with any request and approval beyond that percentage triggering an automatic public vote. Staff is also proposing that properties requesting designation be exempt from this code amendment. The AspenModern designation process is a negotiation, and every property is unique. Staff believes HPC and City Council should have the discretion to provide benefits that make sense for the property without triggering a public vote. In addition, staff proposes to consolidate the boards that hear different variance requests. Currently, the Planning & Zoning Commission (P&Z) and Historic Preservation Commission (HPC) review requests for Planned Development, Growth Management Allotments, Subdivision, Timeshare, Residential and Commercial Design, and Special Review applications. They each meet every other week and are well equipped to review all manner of land use requests, including dimensional variation requests. Hardship Variances (those variance requests due to a specific physical constraint or other hardship that uniquely impacts a property – the review criteria are slightly different for historic landmarks) are currently reviewed by the Board of Adjustment (BOA), which meets infrequently, sometimes as few as once or twice a year. While the BOA carries out their responsibilities well, staff proposes that hardship Variances be reviewed by the P&Z and HPC, and that the P&Z be designated as the City’s Board of Adjustment. HPC would hear Variance requests on historic properties and in Historic Districts. REQUEST OF HPC: The Historic Preservation Commission is asked to provide general feedback on the proposed code amendment, as well as comments on the following specific issues: 1. Does HPC have a recommendation on how a code amendment should impact AspenModern designations? 2. How does HPC feel about hearing Hardship Variances? ATTACHMENTS : Exhibit A – Approved Policy Resolution P3 III.A. Resolution No. 13, Series 2015 Page 1 of 2 RESOLUTION NO. 13, (SERIES OF 2015) A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF ASPEN CITY COUNCIL REQUESTING AMENDMENTS TO ESTABLISH LIMITS ON DIMENSIONAL AND OTHER VARIATIONS THAT MAY BE REQUESTED BY A LAND USE APPLICANT. WHEREAS, pursuant to Section 26.310.020(A), the Community Development Department received direction from City Council to explore code amendments related to establishing limits on the amount of variation from Land Use Code requirements an Applicant may request prior to triggering an automatic public vote (referendum) on the project; and, WHEREAS, the Community Development Director recommended changes to the Land Use Code and/or City Charter to implement City Council’s direction; and, WHEREAS, City Council has reviewed the proposed code amendment policy direction, and finds it meets the criteria outlined in Section 26.310.040; and, WHEREAS, pursuant to Section 26.310.020(B)(2), during a duly noticed public hearing on January 26, 2015, the City Council approved Resolution No. 13, Series of 2015, by a five to zero (5 – 0) vote, requesting code amendments to establish limits on dimensional and other variations that may be requested by a land use Applicant; and, WHEREAS, this Resolution does not amend the Land Use Code or City Charter, but provides direction to staff for processing amendments to the Land Use Code and/or City Charter; and, WHEREAS, the City Council finds that this Resolution implements the City’s goals related to creating a clearer and more predictable land use review process, as articulated in the 2012 Aspen Area Community Plan; and WHEREAS, the City Council finds that this Resolution furthers and is necessary for the promotion of public health, safety, and welfare. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ASPEN AS FOLLOWS: Section 1: Code Amendment Objective and Direction City Council herby directs staff to process amendments to the City Land Use Code and/or City Charter to create more clarity and predictability in the land use review process by: • Establishing limits on the dimensional and affordable housing variations that may be requested by an Applicant; and • Establishing thresholds for when an automatic public vote (referendum) would occur on a land use application that requests a variation from Land Use Code requirements. • Designating the Planning & Zoning Commission as the City’s Board of Adjustment. P4 III.A. Resolution No. 13, Series 2015 Page 2 of 2 Section 2: This resolution shall not affect any existing litigation and shall not operate as an abatement of any action or proceeding now pending under or by virtue of the resolutions or ordinances repealed or amended as herein provided, and the same shall be conducted and concluded under such prior resolutions or ordinances. Section 3: If any section, subsection, sentence, clause, phrase, or portion of this resolution is for any reason held invalid or unconstitutional in a court of competent jurisdiction, such portion shall be deemed a separate, distinct and independent provision and shall not affect the validity of the remaining portions thereof. FINALLY, adopted this 26 th day of February 2015. _______________________________ Steven Skadron, Mayor ATTEST: APPROVED AS TO FORM: _______________________________ ______________________________ Linda Manning, City Clerk James R True, City Attorney P5 III.A. 202 N. Monarch Street Subdivision, Lot 2 Page 1 of 5 FINAL MAJOR DEVELOPMENT MEMORANDUM TO: Aspen Historic Preservation Commission FROM: Amy Simon, Historic Preservation Officer RE: 202 N. Monarch Subdivision, Lot 2–Final Major Development, PUBLIC HEARING DATE: February 11, 2014 ________________________________________________________________________ SUMMARY: The subject property is a vacant parcel directly behind (east) of the “Blue Vic,” the large Victorian at the corner of Bleeker and Monarch Streets. The parcel was created through a Subdivision approved in 2006, and remained a designated landmark, like the adjacent historic home. A duplex is proposed. HPC granted Conceptual design approval on January 7th . Final review is requested. APPLICANT: Garrett Gulch Equity Venture, LLC, represented by S2 Architects. PARCEL ID: 2737-073-17-031. ADDRESS: 202 N. Monarch Street Subdivision, Lot 2, City and Townsite of Aspen, Colorado. ZONING: Mixed-Use. (Please note that this parcel is zoned Mixed Use due to its proximity to the commercial development along Mill Street, rather than R-6, like most of the West End. Residential development is permitted in the zone district, but incurs a 20% floor area penalty, which has been included in this proposal. Allowed floor area is also reduced due to steep slopes at the rear of the site.) Major Development is a two-step process requiring approval by the HPC of a Conceptual Development Plan, and then a Final Development Plan. Approval of a Conceptual Development Plan shall be binding upon HPC in regards to the location and form of the envelope of the structure(s) and/or addition(s) as depicted in the Conceptual Plan application including its height, scale, massing and proportions. No changes will be made to this aspect of the proposed development by the HPC as part of their review of the Final Development Plan unless agreed to by the applicant. P6 III.C. 202 N. Monarch Street Subdivision, Lot 2 Page 2 of 5 Staff Response: Final review focuses on landscape plan, lighting, fenestration, and selection of new materials. A list of the relevant design guidelines is attached as “Exhibit A.” The subject property is just over 6,000 square feet in size. The proposal is to construct a duplex with a total floor area of 2,717 square feet. This is 500 square feet less than the typical single family home allowance on a similar lot in the West End, and about half the size of what could be constructed if the site were developed as mixed use. There are no dimensional variances involved in this project. The property drops off significantly at the rear of the site. The garage for the units will be below grade, accessed from an alley off of Mill Street. The proposed new duplex is the center structure shown in this Bleeker streetscape drawing. Staff finds that the project relates well to the adjacent properties and provides a sensitively designed transition between residential and commercial development. The primary exterior materials are brick, vertical wood siding and wood rain screen. These materials are found on the neighboring buildings. The lighting plan includes site lighting which is low to the ground and recessed lighting at the entry porch for each unit. The duplex is pushed to the east side of the lot, providing some breathing room for the historic structure to the west. The application graphics, including 3D modeling, present the project very clearly. Staff recommends Final approval as designed. P7 III.C. 202 N. Monarch Street Subdivision, Lot 2 Page 3 of 5 =============================================================== STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends HPC grant Final approval with the following condition: 1. HPC granted a waiver from the Residential Design Standard related to Secondary Mass at Conceptual Review, Resolution #2, Series of 2015. 2. The development approvals granted herein shall constitute a site-specific development plan vested for a period of three (3) years from the date of issuance of a development order. However, any failure to abide by any of the terms and conditions attendant to this approval shall result in the forfeiture of said vested property rights. Unless otherwise exempted or extended, failure to properly record all plats and agreements required to be recorded, as specified herein, within 180 days of the effective date of the development order shall also result in the forfeiture of said vested property rights and shall render the development order void within the meaning of Section 26.104.050 (Void permits). Zoning that is not part of the approved site-specific development plan shall not result in the creation of a vested property right. No later than fourteen (14) days following final approval of all requisite reviews necessary to obtain a development order as set forth in this Ordinance, the City Clerk shall cause to be published in a newspaper of general circulation within the jurisdictional boundaries of the City of Aspen, a notice advising the general public of the approval of a site specific development plan and creation of a vested property right pursuant to this Title. Such notice shall be substantially in the following form: Notice is hereby given to the general public of the approval of a site specific development plan, and the creation of a vested property right, valid for a period of three (3) years, pursuant to the Land Use Code of the City of Aspen and Title 24, Article 68, Colorado Revised Statutes, pertaining to the following described property: 202 N. Monarch Street Subdivision, Lot 2, City and Townsite of Aspen. Nothing in this approval shall exempt the development order from subsequent reviews and approvals required by this approval of the general rules, regulations and ordinances or the City of Aspen provided that such reviews and approvals are not inconsistent with this approval. The approval granted hereby shall be subject to all rights of referendum and judicial review; the period of time permitted by law for the exercise of such rights shall not begin to run until the date of publication of the notice of final development approval as required under Section 26.304.070(A). The rights of referendum shall be limited as set forth in the Colorado Constitution and the Aspen Home Rule Charter. P8 III.C. 202 N. Monarch Street Subdivision, Lot 2 Page 4 of 5 EXHIBITS : Resolution #__, Series of 2015 Exhibit A: HPC Design Guidelines Exhibit B: Application Exhibit A: Relevant HPC Design Guidelines, Final review 1.3 A new replacement fence should have a “transparent” quality allowing views into the yard from the street. A fence that defines a front yard is usually low to the ground and "transparent" in nature. On residential properties, a fence which is located forward of the front building facade may not be taller than 42" from natural grade. (For additional information, see the City of Aspen's "Residential Design Standards".) A privacy fence may be used in back yards and along alleys, but not forward of the front facade of a building. Note that using no fencing at all is often the best approach. Contemporary interpretations of traditional fences should be compatible with the historic context. 1.4 New fence components should be similar in scale with those seen traditionally. Fence columns or piers should be proportional to the fence segment. 1.9 Maintain the established progression of public-to-private spaces when considering a rehabilitation project. This includes a sequence of experiences, beginning with the "public" sidewalk, proceeding along a "semi-public" walkway, to a "semi-private" porch or entry feature and ending in the "private" spaces beyond. Provide a walkway running perpendicular from the street to the front entry. Meandering walkways are discouraged, except where it is needed to avoid a tree. Use paving materials that are similar to those used historically for the building style. Concrete, wood or sandstone may be appropriate for certain building styles. 1.15 Minimize the visual impacts of site lighting. Site lighting should be shielded to avoid glare onto adjacent properties. Focus lighting on walks and entries, rather than up into trees and onto facade planes. 11.7 Roof materials should appear similar in scale and texture to those used traditionally. Roof materials should have a matte, non-reflective finish. 11.8 Use building materials that contribute to a traditional sense of human scale. Materials that appear similar in scale and finish to those used historically on the site are encouraged. Use of highly reflective materials is discouraged. 11.9 Use building components that are similar in size and shape to those of the historic property. These include windows, doors and porches. Overall, details should be modest in character. 11.10 The imitation of older historic styles is discouraged. P9 III.C. 202 N. Monarch Street Subdivision, Lot 2 Page 5 of 5 This blurs the distinction between old and new buildings. Highly complex and ornately detailed revival styles that were not a part of Aspen's history are especially discouraged on historic sites. 14.6 Exterior lights should be simple in character and similar in color and intensity to that used traditionally. The design of a fixture should be simple in form and detail. Exterior lighting must be approved by the HPC. All exterior light sources should have a low level of luminescence. 14.7 Minimize the visual impacts of site and architectural lighting. Unshielded, high intensity light sources and those which direct light upward will not be permitted. Shield lighting associated with service areas, parking lots and parking structures. Timers or activity switches may be required to prevent unnecessary sources of light by controlling the length of time that exterior lights are in use late at night. Do not wash an entire building facade in light. Avoid placing exposed light fixtures in highly visible locations, such as on the upper walls of buildings. Avoid duplicating fixtures. For example, do not use two fixtures that light the same area. 14.8 Minimize the visual impact of light spill from a building. Prevent glare onto adjacent properties by using shielded and focused light sources that direct light onto the ground. The use of downlights, with the bulb fully enclosed within the shade, or step lights which direct light only on to walkways, is strongly encouraged. Lighting shall be carefully located so as not to shine into residential living space, on or off the property or into public rights-of-way. P10 III.C. HPC Resolution #__, Series of 2015 Page 1 of 2 A RESOLUTION OF THE ASPEN HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION (HPC) GRANTING FINAL MAJOR DEVELOPMENT APPROVAL FOR THE PROPERTY LOCATED AT 202 N. MONARCH SUBDIVISION, LOT 2, CITY AND TOWNSITE OF ASPEN, COLORADO RESOLUTION #__, SERIES OF 2015 PARCEL ID: 2737-073-17-031 WHEREAS, the applicant, Garrett Gulch Equity Venture, LLC, represented by S2 Architects, has requested HPC Final Major Development approval for construction of a new duplex on the vacant property located at 202 N. Monarch Subdivision, Lot 2, City and Townsite of Aspen, Colorado; and WHEREAS, Section 26.415.070 of the Municipal Code states that “no building or structure shall be erected, constructed, enlarged, altered, repaired, relocated or improved involving a designated historic property or district until plans or sufficient information have been submitted to the Community Development Director and approved in accordance with the procedures established for their review;” and WHEREAS, for Final Major Development Review, the HPC must review the application, a staff analysis report and the evidence presented at a hearing to determine the project’s conformance with the City of Aspen Historic Preservation Design Guidelines per Section 26.415.070.D.4 of the Municipal Code and other applicable Code Sections. The HPC may approve, disapprove, approve with conditions or continue the application to obtain additional information necessary to make a decision to approve or deny; and WHEREAS, HPC reviewed the project on February 11, 2015. HPC considered the application, the staff memo and public comments, and found the proposal consistent with the review standards and granted approval with conditions by a vote of __ to __. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED: That HPC hereby grants Final Major Development approval for 202 N. Monarch Subdivision, Lot 2, City and Townsite of Aspen, Colorado with the following conditions: 1. HPC granted a waiver from the Residential Design Standard related to Secondary Mass at Conceptual Review, Resolution #2, Series of 2015. 2. The development approvals granted herein shall constitute a site-specific development plan vested for a period of three (3) years from the date of issuance of a development order. However, any failure to abide by any of the terms and conditions attendant to this approval shall result in the forfeiture of said vested property rights. Unless otherwise exempted or extended, failure to properly record all plats and agreements required to be recorded, as specified herein, within 180 days of the effective date of the development order shall also result in the forfeiture of said vested property rights and shall render the development order void within the meaning of Section 26.104.050 (Void permits). Zoning that is not part of the approved site-specific development plan shall not result in the creation of a vested property right. P11 III.C. HPC Resolution #__, Series of 2015 Page 2 of 2 No later than fourteen (14) days following final approval of all requisite reviews necessary to obtain a development order as set forth in this Ordinance, the City Clerk shall cause to be published in a newspaper of general circulation within the jurisdictional boundaries of the City of Aspen, a notice advising the general public of the approval of a site specific development plan and creation of a vested property right pursuant to this Title. Such notice shall be substantially in the following form: Notice is hereby given to the general public of the approval of a site specific development plan, and the creation of a vested property right, valid for a period of three (3) years, pursuant to the Land Use Code of the City of Aspen and Title 24, Article 68, Colorado Revised Statutes, pertaining to the following described property: 202 N. Monarch Street Subdivision, Lot 2, City and Townsite of Aspen. Nothing in this approval shall exempt the development order from subsequent reviews and approvals required by this approval of the general rules, regulations and ordinances or the City of Aspen provided that such reviews and approvals are not inconsistent with this approval. The approval granted hereby shall be subject to all rights of referendum and judicial review; the period of time permitted by law for the exercise of such rights shall not begin to run until the date of publication of the notice of final development approval as required under Section 26.304.070(A). The rights of referendum shall be limited as set forth in the Colorado Constitution and the Aspen Home Rule Charter. APPROVED BY THE COMMISSION at its regular meeting on the 11th day of February, 2015. Approved as to Form: Approved as to Content: ___________________________________ _____________________________ Debbie Quinn, Assistant City Attorney Willis Pember, Chair ATTEST: ___________________________ Kathy Strickland, Chief Deputy Clerk P12 III.C.  COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT Agreement to Pay Application Fees An agreement between the City of Aspen (“City”) and Property Owner (“I”): Phone No.: Email: Address of Property: (subject of application) Billing Address: (send bills here) I understand that the City has adopted, via Ordinance No. , Series of 2011, review fees for Land Use applications and the payment of these fees is a condition precedent to determining application completeness. I understand that as the property owner that I am responsible for paying all fees for this development application. For flat fees and referral fees: I agree to pay the following fees for the services indicated. I understand that these flat fees are non-refundable. $_________ flat fee for _____________________. $_________ flat fee for _____________________. $_________ flat fee for _____________________. $_________ flat fee for _____________________. For deposit cases only: The City and I understand that because of the size, nature or scope of the proposed project, it is not possible at this time to know the full extent or total costs involved in processing the application. I understand that additional costs over and above the deposit may accrue. I understand and agree that it is impracticable for City staff to complete processing, review, and presentation of sufficient information to enable legally required findings to be made for project consideration, unless invoices are paid in full. The City and I understand and agree that invoices mailed by the City to the above listed billing address and not returned to the City shall be considered by the City as being received by me. I agree to remit payment within 30 days of presentation of an invoice by the City for such services. I have read, understood, and agree to the Land Use Review Fee Policy including consequences for non-payment. I agree to pay the following initial deposit amounts for the specified hours of staff time. I understand that payment of a deposit does not render an application complete or compliant with approval criteria. If actual recorded costs exceed the initial deposit, I agree to pay additional monthly billings to the City to reimburse the City for the processing of my application at the hourly rates hereinafter stated. $___________ deposit for _______ hours of Community Development Department staff time. Additional time above the deposit amount will be billed at $325 per hour. $___________ deposit for ______ hours of Engineering Department staff time. Additional time above the deposit amount will be billed at $265 per hour. City of Aspen: Property Owner: Chris Bendon Community Development Director Name: Title: ____ City Use: Fees Due: $___________ Received: $____________ -DQXDU\     &LW\RI$VSHQ_6*DOHQD6W_   Garret Gulch Equity Venture, LLC 970.300.2120 Bill@stagefinehomes.com 2032 N. Monarch Street Sub. Lot 2 2950 E. Broad St. Columbus, OH 43209 0 Select Dept 0 Select Dept 0 Select Dept 0 Select Review 1,950 6 Bill Guth (Garret Gulch Equity Venture, LLC) Authorized Representative 1950 William Guth Digitally signed by William Guth DN: cn=William Guth, o, ou, email=william.n.guth@gmail.com, c=US Date: 2015.01.06 08:23:15 -07'00' P13 III.C. ATTACHMENT 2 –LAND USE APPLICATION PROJECT: TYPE OF APPLICATION: (please check all that apply): Name: Location: (Indicate street address, lot & block number, legal description where appropriate) Parcel ID # (REQUIRED) APPLICANT: Name: Address: Phone #: REPRESENTATIVE: Name: Address: Phone #: GMQS Exemption Conceptual PUD Temporary Use GMQS Allotment Final PUD (& PUD Amendment) Text/Map Amendment Special Review Subdivision Conceptual SPA ESA – 8040 Greenline, Stream Margin, Hallam Lake Bluff, Mountain View Plane Subdivision Exemption (includes condominiumization) Final SPA (& SPA Amendment) Commercial Design Review Lot Split Small Lodge Conversion/ Expansion Residential Design Variance Lot Line Adjustment Other: Conditional Use EXISTING CONDITIONS: (description of existing buildings, uses, previous approvals, etc.) PROPOSAL: (description of proposed buildings, uses, modifications, etc.) Have you attached the following? FEES DUE: $______ Pre-Application Conference Summary Attachment #1, Signed Fee Agreement Response to Attachment #3, Dimensional Requirements Form Response to Attachment #4, Submittal Requirements- Including Written Responses to Review Standards 3-D Model for large project All plans that are larger than 8.5” X 11” must be folded. A disk with an electric copy of all written text (Microsoft Word Format) must be submitted as part of the application. Large scale projects should include an electronic 3-D model. Your pre-application conference summary will indicate if you must submit a 3-D model.  4"SDIJUFDUT+PTFQI4QFBST /.POBSDI4VJUF("TQFO $PMPSBEP  (BSSFUU(VMDI&RVJUZ7FOUVSF --$ &#SPBE4U$PMVNCVT0)  202 N. Monarch Lot 2 202 N. Monarch Street Subdivision, Lot 2 HPC REVIEW The site is current undeveloped The proposal of a Duplex 1,950 P14 III.C. ATTACHMENT 3 DIMENSIONAL REQUIREMENTS FORM Project: Applicant: Location: Zone District: Lot Size: Lot Area: (for the purposes of calculating Floor Area, Lot Area may be reduced for areas within the high water mark, easements, and steep slopes. Please refer to the definition of Lot Area in the Municipal Code.) Commercial net leasable: Existing:__________Proposed:___________________ Number of residential units: Existing:__________Proposed:___________________ Number of bedrooms: Existing:__________Proposed:___________________ Proposed % of demolition (Historic properties only):__________ DIMENSIONS: Floor Area: Existing:_________Allowable:__________Proposed:________ Principal bldg. height: Existing:_________Allowable:__________Proposed:________ Access. bldg. height: Existing:_________Allowable:__________Proposed:________ On-Site parking: Existing:_________Required:___________Proposed:________ % Site coverage: Existing:_________Required:___________Proposed:________ % Open Space: Existing:_________Required:___________Proposed:________ Front Setback: Existing:_________Required:___________Proposed:________ Rear Setback: Existing:_________Required:___________Proposed:________ Combined F/R: Existing:_________Required:___________Proposed:________ Side Setback: Existing:_________Required:___________Proposed:________ Side Setback: Existing:_________Required:___________Proposed:________ Combined Sides: Existing:_________Required:___________Proposed:________ Distance Between Buildings Existing ________Required:__________Proposed:_____ Existing non-conformities or encroachments:___________________________________ _______________________________________________________________________ /PWBSJBODFTSFRVFTUFEVariations requested:____________________________________ ________________________________________________________________________  h h h h /"/" h h h h /" /" /" (BSSFUU(VMDI&RVJUZ7FOUVSF --$ "WBSJBODFGPSTFDPOEBSZNBTTJTCFJOHSFRVFTUFE 202 N. Monarch, Lot 2 202 N. Monarch Street Subdivision, Lot 2 MU 6,031 SF 60.31' x 100' 0 0 0 2 7 0 0 2,716 SF 2,716 SF 25 24'-9" 4 6 P15 III.C. CITY OF ASPEN PRE-APPLICATION CONFERENCE SUMMARY PLANNER: Amy Simon DATE: 12/26/2014 PROJECT: 202 N. Monarch Subdivision, Lot 2 REPRESENTATIVE: S2 Architects REQUEST: HPC Final Major Development review and Final Residential Design Standards review DESCRIPTION: 202 N. Monarch Subdivision, Lot 2 is a vacant lot that has historical landmark designation. A proposed redevelopment requires Conceptual and Final HPC Design review. Final review focuses on topics such as materials, landscape and lighting. HPC’s determination will be according to the Historic Preservation Design Guidelines. A preliminary list of relevant guidelines are provided at the end of this pre-application summary. The project must also comply with any Residential Design Standards not covered at Conceptual review. Below are links to the Historic Preservation Design Guidelines and Land Use Code for your convenience: HPC Design Guidelines: http://www.aspenpitkin.com/Departments/Community-Development/Historic-Preservation/Historic- Properties/ Land Use Code: http://www.aspenpitkin.com/Departments/Community-Development/Planning-and-Zoning/Title-26- Land-Use-Code/ Relevant Land Use Code Section(s): 26.304 Common Development Review Procedures 26.410 Residential Design Standards 26.415.070.D Major Development 26.575.020 Calculations and Measurements 26.710 R-6 Zone District Review by:Staff for completeness and recommendation HPC for determination Public Hearing: Yes, at HPC Neighborhood Outreach:None Planning Fees:$1,950 for 6 hours of staff time. Any unbilled portion of this deposit will be refunded at the conclusion of the case. Additional staff hours, if needed, will be billed at $325 per hour. AHPC Final Major Development 202 N. Monarch Subdivision, Lot 2 1 P16 III.C. Total Deposit: $1,950 To apply, submit 1 copy of the following information: …Completed Land Use Application and signed fee agreement. …Pre-application Conference Summary (this document). …Street address and legal description of the parcel on which development is proposed to occur, consisting of a current (not older than 6 months) certificate from a title insurance company, an ownership and encumbrance report, or attorney licensed to practice in the State of Colorado, listing the names of all owners of the property, and all mortgages, judgments, liens, easements, contracts and agreements affecting the parcel, and demonstrating the owner’s right to apply for the Development Application. …Applicant’s name, address and telephone number in a letter signed by the applicant that states the name, address and telephone number of the representative authorized to act on behalf of the applicant. …A site improvement survey (not older than a year from submittal) including topography and vegetation showing the current status of the parcel certified by a registered land surveyor by licensed in the State of Colorado. …HOA Compliance form (Attached) …A written description of the proposal and an explanation in written, graphic, or model form of how the proposed development complies with the review standards relevant to the development application and relevant land use approvals associated with the property. Provide a site plan, floor plans, elevations and roof plan, a lighting plan and a landscape plan. Identify all building materials. Bring samples of materials to the HPC hearing. …Written responses to relevant design guidelines. …An 8 1/2” by 11” vicinity map locating the parcel within the City of Aspen. Once the application is determined to be complete, submit: …A digital copy of the full application provided in pdf file format by email to amy.simon@cityofaspen.com. …10 copies of the project graphics. …Total deposit for review of the application. Disclaimer: The foregoing summary is advisory in nature only and is not binding on the City. The summary is based on current zoning, which is subject to change in the future, and upon factual representations that may or may not be accurate. The summary does not create a legal or vested right. 2 P17 III.C. COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT Homeowner Association Compliance Policy All land use applications within the City of Aspen are required to include a Homeowner Association Compliance Form (this form) certifying the scope of work included in the land use application complies with all applicable covenants and homeowner association policies. The certification must be signed by the property owner or Attorney representing the property owner. Property Owner (“I”): Name: Email: Phone No.: Address of Property: (subject of application) I certify as follows: (pick one) Ƒ This property is not subject to a homeowners association or other form of private covenant. Ƒ This property is subject to a homeowners association or private covenant and the improvements proposed in this land use application do not require approval by the homeowners association or covenant beneficiary. Ƒ This property is subject to a homeowners association or private covenant and the improvements proposed in this land use application have been approved by the homeowners association or covenant beneficiary. Evidence of approval is attached. I understand this policy and I understand the City of Aspen does not interpret, enforce, or manage the applicability, meaning or effect of private covenants or homeowner association rules or bylaws. I understand that this document is a public document. Owner signature: _________________________ date:___________ Owner printed name: _________________________ or, Attorney signature: _________________________ date:_________ Attorney printed name: _________________________ City C970 /.POBSDI4USFFU4VCEJWJTJPO-PU "TQFO $PMPSBEP #JMM(VUI #JMM!TUBHFGJOFIPNFTDPN  1-6-14 Garrett Gulch Equity Venture, LLC William Guth Digitally signed by William Guth DN: cn=William Guth, o, ou, email=william.n.guth@gmail.com, c=US Date: 2015.01.06 08:24:11 -07'00' P18 III.C. Preliminary list of relevant Historic Preservation Guidelines, Final Review 1.3 A new replacement fence should have a “transparent” quality allowing views into the yard from the street. ‰A fence that defines a front yard is usually low to the ground and "transparent" in nature. ‰On residential properties, a fence which is located forward of the front building facade may not be taller than 42" from natural grade. (For additional information, see the City of Aspen's "Residential Design Standards".) ‰A privacy fence may be used in back yards and along alleys, but not forward of the front facade of a building. ‰Note that using no fencing at all is often the best approach. ‰Contemporary interpretations of traditional fences should be compatible with the historic context. 1.4 New fence components should be similar in scale with those seen traditionally. ‰Fence columns or piers should be proportional to the fence segment. 1.9 Maintain the established progression of public-to-private spaces when considering a rehabilitation project. ‰This includes a sequence of experiences, beginning with the "public" sidewalk, proceeding along a "semi-public" walkway, to a "semi-private" porch or entry feature and ending in the "private" spaces beyond. ‰Provide a walkway running perpendicular from the street to the front entry. Meandering walkways are discouraged, except where it is needed to avoid a tree. ‰Use paving materials that are similar to those used historically for the building style. Concrete, wood or sandstone may be appropriate for certain building styles. 4 P19 III.C. 1.15 Minimize the visual impacts of site lighting. ‰Site lighting should be shielded to avoid glare onto adjacent properties. Focus lighting on walks and entries, rather than up into trees and onto facade planes. 11.7 Roof materials should appear similar in scale and texture to those used traditionally. ‰Roof materials should have a matte, non-reflective finish. 11.8 Use building materials that contribute to a traditional sense of human scale. ‰Materials that appear similar in scale and finish to those used historically on the site are encouraged. ‰Use of highly reflective materials is discouraged. 11.9 Use building components that are similar in size and shape to those of the historic property. ‰These include windows, doors and porches. ‰Overall, details should be modest in character. 11.10 The imitation of older historic styles is discouraged. ‰This blurs the distinction between old and new buildings. ‰Highly complex and ornately detailed revival styles that were not a part of Aspen's history are especially discouraged on historic sites. 14.6 Exterior lights should be simple in character and similar in color and intensity to that used traditionally. ‰The design of a fixture should be simple in form and detail. Exterior lighting must be approved by the HPC. ‰All exterior light sources should have a low level of luminescence. 14.7 Minimize the visual impacts of site and architectural lighting. 5 P20 III.C. ‰Unshielded, high intensity light sources and those which direct light upward will not be permitted. ‰Shield lighting associated with service areas, parking lots and parking structures. ‰Timers or activity switches may be required to prevent unnecessary sources of light by controlling the length of time that exterior lights are in use late at night. ‰Do not wash an entire building facade in light. ‰Avoid placing exposed light fixtures in highly visible locations, such as on the upper walls of buildings. ‰Avoid duplicating fixtures. For example, do not use two fixtures that light the same area. 14.8 Minimize the visual impact of light spill from a building. ‰Prevent glare onto adjacent properties by using shielded and focused light sources that direct light onto the ground. The use of downlights, with the bulb fully enclosed within the shade, or step lights which direct light only on to walkways, is strongly encouraged. ‰Lighting shall be carefully located so as not to shine into residential living space, on or off the property or into public rights-of-way. 6 P21 III.C. P 2 2 I I I . C . P 2 3 I I I . C . P24 I I I . C . P25 I I I . C . P26 I I I . C . P 2 7 I I I . C . P 2 8 I I I . C . P 2 9 I I I . C . P 3 0 I I I . C . P 3 1 I I I . C . P 3 2 I I I . C . P 3 3 I I I . C . P 3 4 I I I . C . P 3 5 I I I . C . P 3 6 I I I . C . P 3 7 I I I . C . Product data sheet In-ground luminaire 8673 17.14 · Technical amendments reserved BEGA Lichttechnische Spezialfabrik Hennenbusch · D - 58708 Menden ! IP 67 Project · Reference number Date Application LED in-ground luminaire with half-sided light sector. For installation in compacted surfaces, paths or floors. Drive-over luminaire for vehicles with pneumatic tyres. For pressure load up to 1,000 kg. At the glass surface the luminaire attains an operating temperature of 30 °C (measured according to EN 60598 at an ambient temperature of ta 15 °C). Please note: Luminaire must not be used for installation in road lanes, where the fixture is exposed to a horizontal strain due to braking, acceleration and change of direction. Product description Luminaire cover made of aluminium alloy Luminaire housing made of cast stainless steel and stainless steel Steel grade number 1.4571 Optical lens is made of silicate glass Silicone gasket Baseplate with 4 fixing holes elongated holes 5 mm wide 75 x 75 mm spacing 1.8 m water-resistant connecting cable 05RN8-F 3x1@ with water stopper and 1.2 m PVC cable conduit LED-Power supply unit 220-240 V x0/50-60 Hz DC 120-370 V DC Start ≥ 198 V Safety class I Protection class IP 67 Dust tight and protection against temporary immersion c – Conformity mark Weight: 1.4 kg Ø 120 Ø 9 6 30 95 12 □ 9 0 □ 7 5 Lamp LED 3000 K 3.4 W Connected wattage 5.2 W Lamp luminous flux 260 lm Luminaire luminous flux 39 lm Colour rendering index Ra > 80 BEGA Article No. 3x LED-0304/830 LED 4000 K 3.4 W Connected wattage 5.2 W Lamp luminous flux 280 lm Luminaire luminous flux 42 lm Colour rendering index Ra > 80 BEGA Article No. 3x LED-0304/840 Article No. 8673 Colour temperature 3000 K. Also available with 4000 K on request. 3000 K – article number 4000 K – article number + K4 Accessories 730 Distribution box The distribution box is meant for installation in the soil and allows a junction from the supply cable to the luminaire and through-wiring to the next luminaire. After the electrical connection the distribution box is filled up with gel and closed. www.bega.com P38 III.C. Product data sheet Recessed luminaire 2384 23.14 · Technical amendments reserved BEGA Lichttechnische Spezialfabrik Hennenbusch · D - 58708 Menden ! IP 65 Project · Reference number Date Application Recessed LED luminaire with directed light for recessed installation in walls. For interior and exterior lighting applications. The used LED technique offers durability and optimal light output with low power consumption at the same time. Product description Luminaire made of aluminium alloy, aluminium and stainless steel Clear safety glass Required recessed opening 306 x 60 mm Recessed depth 70 mm Fixing is achieved by using four adjustable wedge-shaped claws European patent EP 0 686 806 1 cable entry for mains supply cable up to ø 10.5 mm max. 3 x 1.5@ Plug connection Connecting terminal 2.5@ Earth conductor connection LED-Power supply unit 220-240 V x 0/50-60 Hz DC 176-264 V DC Start ≥ 198 V Safety class I Protection class IP 65 Dust tight and protection against water jets c – Conformity mark Weight: 1.1 kg 314 60 x 3 0 6 32070 64 70 60 7 5 2 1 0,5 0,2 0,1 lx m 2 4 6 8 10 2 0 2 4 4 2384 LEDH = 1,0 m Lamp LED 3000 K 11.2 W Connected wattage 13.6 W Lamp luminous flux 875 lm Luminaire luminous flux 299 lm Colour rendering index Ra > 80 BEGA Article No. LED-0204/830 LED 4000 K 11.2 W Connected wattage 13.6 W Lamp luminous flux 940 lm Luminaire luminous flux 323 lm Colour rendering index Ra > 80 BEGA Article No. LED-0204/840 Article No. 2384 Colour temperature 3000 K. Also available with 4000 K on request. 3000 K – article number 4000 K – article number + K4 Colour graphite or silver graphite – article number silver – article number + A Accessories 426 Installation housing For preparing the recess opening it can be practical to use an installation housing made of aluminium. A separate instructions for use can be provided upon request. Light distribution www.bega.com P39 III.C. TYPE:PROJECT:PROJECT INFORMATION CATALOG#: LHQLD3 - 3" MINI-ARC SQUARE LED HOUSINGLHQLD3 - 3" MINI-ARC SQUARE LED HOUSINGLHQLD3 - 3" MINI-ARC SQUARE LED HOUSINGLHQLD3 - 3" MINI-ARC SQUARE LED HOUSING 3" 12W/19W LED SQUARE DOWNLIGHTS ª8"¶8" ¡™w"¡ºa" o12 o0o24o36 o12 o24 o36 35°35° 0o 5o 5o o10 o10 o o 15 o15 20 o20 o o 25 o25 30 o30 o35 o40 o45 o35 o40 o45 45° 45° FEATURE:FEATURE:FEATURE:FEATURE: 3 " 1 2 W / 1 9 W L E D S Q U A R E D O W N L I G H T S F i l e L o c a t e d o n l i n e w w w . l i t o n . c o m / s p e c I D # : 2 6 5 0 2 0 1 4 . 9 . 1 2 Tel: 323.904.0200 Product specifications subject to change without notice. www.liton.com A DIVISION OF LIGHTING GROUP ORDERINGORDERINGORDERINGORDERING ORDERING EXAMPLE :ORDERING EXAMPLE :ORDERING EXAMPLE :ORDERING EXAMPLE : LHQLD312C35UE-DUN-B25-T27-C90 LHQLD3 LHQLD3 LHQLD3 LHQLD3 LHQLD3 LHQLD3 LHQLD3 LHQLD3 12C35 12C35 12C35 12C35 19C70 19C70 19C70 19C70 :12W :19W* WATTAGE WATTAGE WATTAGE WATTAGE Blank Blank Blank Blank UE UE UE UE UE-D10 UE-D10 UE-D10 UE-D10 UE-DUN UE-DUN UE-DUN UE-DUN -DIN -DIN -DIN -DIN -EM -EM -EM -EM :120V Non-Dimming :120V/277V :120V/277V 0-10V** :120V-277V UniDimTM*** :120V Incandescent Dimming :Remote 5W Emergency+ OPTIONS OPTIONS OPTIONS OPTIONS Blank Blank Blank Blank -B25 -B25 -B25 -B25 -B60 -B60 -B60 -B60 :45° Narrow Flood :Spot++ :60° Wide Flood BEAM SPREAD BEAM SPREAD BEAM SPREAD BEAM SPREAD Blank Blank Blank Blank -T27 -T27 -T27 -T27 -T27-C90 -T27-C90 -T27-C90 -T27-C90 -T35 -T35 -T35 -T35 -T40 -T40 -T40 -T40 :3000K :2700K+++ :2700K 90+ CRI+++ :3500K+++ :4000K+++ LED LED LED LED * Not rated for Insulation Contact. **Only for 12W. ***Available November 2014. +Above ceiling access required for EM option. ++Extended lead time may apply. Consult Factory. Available in August 2014. Beam options not available for lensed trims. +++Extended lead time may apply for quantities over 100 SPECIFICATIONSPECIFICATIONSPECIFICATIONSPECIFICATION Ceiling cut-out: 3 1/2" Square 19W Max LED Application: Application: Application: Application: Mini-Arc2 Phantom 3” Square LED Downlight Housings are designed for low to medium ceiling heights in retail, hospitality, commercial and high-end residential applications. Advanced 'hot-aiming' mechanism allows precise and lockable positioning of the square trim prior to drywall or ceiling panel installation. Post installation adjustment of the beam tilt is possible from below the fixture. Housing works with standard 3" Square trims and 3" Square 'Trimless' trims Adjustability: Adjustability: Adjustability: Adjustability: Collar bracket provides 90º of rotation, marked in 5º increments for positioning before drywall installation. Lamp holder assembly allows 35º tilt and 1-1/2" vertical lamp source adjustment. Housing:Housing:Housing:Housing: Collar bracket adjusts for 1/2" to 1" ceiling thickness. Integral thermal protector guards against improper installation. Trim is secured with 4 torsion spring clips. Mounting:Mounting:Mounting:Mounting: Housing suitable for new construction installations only, supplied with (2) 24" adjustable hanger bars with 90 degrees repositioning ability. Hanger bars equipped with nail-less install 3/4" serrated barbed studs and with captive nails, for faster and easier secure mounting in wood joists. Set-screws lock into position and prevent shifting after installation. Earthquake structural cable compatible for drop panel ceiling or any other mounting that requires direct support from structural ceilings. Driver: Driver: Driver: Driver: Electronic Direct Current LED driver integrally mounted in electric junction box. Dimming: Dimming: Dimming: Dimming: 0-10V dimming option (-D10) works with most 5-Wire 0-10V dimmers. UniDimTM (-DUN) option is a universal dimming system that works with most 3-Wire ELV, 2- Wire Incandescent and 5-Wire 0-10V fluorescent dimmers. Power Connection: Power Connection: Power Connection: Power Connection: LED lamp array is replaceable via on board quick disconnect terminal. Meets CA Title 24 Requirements and other standards restricting the use of Medium Base or Bi-Pin Sockets. Junction BoxJunction BoxJunction BoxJunction Box:16 gauge pre-wired galvanized steel Junction Box, 32 cubic-inch for a maximum of (8) #12 AWG wires. Furnished with (7) 3/4" and (4) Romex knock-outs. Strain clamps to install or remove covers for easy access and ground wire. Equipped with safety standard fitting for flex-conduit. Insulation Contact:Insulation Contact:Insulation Contact:Insulation Contact: Energy Efficient LED housing comes standard with IC rating for direct contact with loosefill blown and rolled insulation. COMPATIBILITYCOMPATIBILITYCOMPATIBILITYCOMPATIBILITY LRQ302LRQ302LRQ302LRQ302 LED SQUARE LENSEDLED SQUARE LENSEDLED SQUARE LENSEDLED SQUARE LENSED REFLECTORREFLECTORREFLECTORREFLECTOR LRQ321LRQ321LRQ321LRQ321 LED SQUARE OPENLED SQUARE OPENLED SQUARE OPENLED SQUARE OPEN REFLECTORREFLECTORREFLECTORREFLECTOR LRQ371LRQ371LRQ371LRQ371 LED SQUARE LENSEDLED SQUARE LENSEDLED SQUARE LENSEDLED SQUARE LENSED WALL WASHWALL WASHWALL WASHWALL WASH LRQ372LRQ372LRQ372LRQ372 LED SQUARE OPENLED SQUARE OPENLED SQUARE OPENLED SQUARE OPEN WALL WASHWALL WASHWALL WASHWALL WASH LRXQ302LRXQ302LRXQ302LRXQ302 SQUARE TRIMLESSSQUARE TRIMLESSSQUARE TRIMLESSSQUARE TRIMLESS LED LENSEDLED LENSEDLED LENSEDLED LENSED REFLECTORREFLECTORREFLECTORREFLECTOR LRXQ321LRXQ321LRXQ321LRXQ321 SQUARE TRIMLESSSQUARE TRIMLESSSQUARE TRIMLESSSQUARE TRIMLESS LED OPEN REFLECTORLED OPEN REFLECTORLED OPEN REFLECTORLED OPEN REFLECTOR LRXQ371LRXQ371LRXQ371LRXQ371 SQUARE TRIMLESSSQUARE TRIMLESSSQUARE TRIMLESSSQUARE TRIMLESS LED LENSED WALLLED LENSED WALLLED LENSED WALLLED LENSED WALL WASHWASHWASHWASH LRXQ372LRXQ372LRXQ372LRXQ372 SQUARE TRIMLESSSQUARE TRIMLESSSQUARE TRIMLESSSQUARE TRIMLESS LED OPEN WALL WASHLED OPEN WALL WASHLED OPEN WALL WASHLED OPEN WALL WASH Note: Wattage limitations on compatible items must be met. Airflow:Airflow:Airflow:Airflow: Airtight option is designed to restrict air flow from room into plenums in compliance to the WSEC - Washington State Energy Code, (Less than 2.0 CFM -Cubic Feet per Minute). Complies to Title24 air flow requirements (Air-tight). Optics:Optics:Optics:Optics: Interchangeable optics allow polycarbonate lens to be changed in the field to modify beamspread. No tools required. Lumen Maintenance:Lumen Maintenance:Lumen Maintenance:Lumen Maintenance: Minimum 50,000 hours L70 life based on ANSI TM-21 calculations from LM80 standardized test results. Thermal Management:Thermal Management:Thermal Management:Thermal Management: Effective thermal dissipation facilitated by integral cast-aluminum, finned heat sink design for maximum heat rejection to provide long LED life. P40 III.C. P 4 1 I I I . C . P 4 2 I I I . C . P 4 3 I I I . C . P 4 4 I I I . C . P 4 5 I I I . C . P 4 6 I I I . C . P 4 7 I I I . C . P 4 8 I I I . C . P 4 9 I I I . C . P 5 0 I I I . C . Southwest Perspective Rendering P 5 1 I I I . C . South Perspective Rendering P 5 2 I I I . C . West Perspective Rendering P 5 3 I I I . C . Backyard Perspective Rendering P 5 4 I I I . C . Southwest Perspective Rendering P 5 5 I I I . C . North Perspective Rendering P 5 6 I I I . C . HPC Review 2.11.15 232 E. Bleeker Page 1 of 7 FINAL MAJOR DEVELOPMENT MEMORANDUM TO: Aspen Historic Preservation Commission FROM: Amy Simon, Historic Preservation Officer RE: 232 E. Bleeker –Final Major Development, PUBLIC HEARING DATE: February 11, 2015 ________________________________________________________________________ SUMMARY: 232 E. Bleeker is a landmark designated 6,000 square foot corner lot with a Victorian era home and a more recently constructed garage on the site. The new owner would like to demolish the garage and make an addition to the Victorian, converting it to a duplex. The house is to be moved forward on the site. On January 14th, HPC granted Conceptual, On-site Relocation, Demolition and Variances for the project. Final approval is requested. APPLICANT: 232 Bleeker LLC, represented by Kim Raymond Architects. PARCEL ID: 2737-073-16-006. ADDRESS: 232 E. Bleeker Street, Lots R and S, Block 72, City and Townsite of Aspen, Colorado. ZONING: R-6. Major Development is a two-step process requiring approval by the HPC of a Conceptual Development Plan, and then a Final Development Plan. Approval of a Conceptual Development Plan shall be binding upon HPC in regards to the location and form of the envelope of the structure(s) and/or addition(s) as depicted in the Conceptual Plan application including its height, scale, massing and proportions. No changes will be made to this aspect of the proposed development by the HPC as part of their review of the Final Development Plan unless agreed to by the applicant. P57 III.D. HPC Review 2.11.15 232 E. Bleeker Page 2 of 7 Staff Response: Final review focuses on landscape plan, lighting, fenestration, and selection of new materials. A list of the relevant design guidelines is attached as “Exhibit A.” As a condition of Conceptual approval and a floor area bonus, HPC required the removal of two non-historic dormers on the east side of the house. This has been included in the Final review plans. The architect has slightly enlarged a new dormer on a deck at the upper west corner of the Victorian to make up for the lost amenity. Staff supports the proposal as it relates to the historic structure. Throughout the review of this project, Staff has expressed concerns with the architectural relationship between the old and new construction. To simplify the philosophy of the HPC as represented in other recent approvals, an addition that is similar in form to the historic resource has latitude with materiality. An addition that is dissimilar in form to the historic resource should have a more direct tie to the materials used on the historic structure. Staff has objected to the form of this addition, and the fact that it is physically connected to the Victorian, especially given the fact that is a corner lot in a central area of town. We respect HPC’s receptiveness to the project at the Conceptual approval and appreciate the fact that the addition is not significantly taller than the historic house. On the matter of materials and Final design review, staff finds that the project conflicts with the guidelines. 10.3 Design a new addition such that one's ability to interpret the historic character of the primary building is maintained. A new addition that creates an appearance inconsistent with the historic character of the primary building is inappropriate. An addition that seeks to imply an earlier period than that of the primary building also is inappropriate. An addition that seeks to imply an inaccurate variation of the primary building's historic style should be avoided. An addition that covers historically significant features is inappropriate. 10.11 On a new addition, use exterior materials that are compatible with the historic materials of the primary building. The new materials should be either similar or subordinate to the original materials. The new addition has a significant amount of glazing, in configurations that are not like the original house, particularly due to the horizontal mullions and grid patterns that are created. Staff recommends that the glazing be restudied to connect with the tall and narrow historic windows that are characteristic of the Victorian. Some large areas of glass with no mullions could be appropriate, if they have a proportion related to the old double hungs. The east façade, at least, should in general have less windows and more wall surface to defer to the Victorian on the side elevation. Staff does not find that the rain screen effectively achieves this relationship. P58 III.D. HPC Review 2.11.15 232 E. Bleeker Page 3 of 7 Following are images of four projects that have received HPC approval in the last 1-2 years. Though some have pitched roofs and some have flat roofs, they are all extremely simple with a very limited material palette, using materials that are found on the adjacent historic building, and for the most part sized the same as the historic material being referenced. Staff finds that the addition proposed in this project competes with the Victorian. The proposed ceramic tile is unlike anything else on the house. The architect has indicated that the tile could have the appearance of board formed concrete, which could create a tie to the clapboard coursing, but it has a very rough finish and character compared to the painted siding that covers the Victorian. Staff recommends the project be continued for a complete restudy of the materials and windows. The wall materials should perhaps involve no more than two products, in a very similar dimension to historic clapboards and brick. Landscape and lighting design are also requirements of Final review. Staff finds that the landscape plan meets the design guidelines, with the exception of the skylight, screened by shrubs in the front yard. This feature, which is really related to the below grade living space, is an intrusion that does not meet guideline 1.10 1.10 Preserve historic elements of the yard to provide an appropriate context for historic structures. The front yard should be maintained in a traditional manner, with planting material and sod, and not covered with paving, for example. P59 III.D. HPC Review 2.11.15 232 E. Bleeker Page 4 of 7 HPC has also not typically allowed modern path lighting leading to the Victorian porch, preferring the porch light to serve the function alone. Staff recommends these two aspects of the plan be removed. ===================================================================== STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends continuation to March 11 th for restudy of the material palette and the aspects of the landscape mentioned in this memo. The applicant may submit a restudy by noon on Tuesday, February 10 th . Aside from materials, recommended conditions of approval are: 1. At Conceptual review, Resolution #3, Series of 2015, HPC approved demolition of the non-historic garage on the property, a 448 square foot floor area bonus, a front setback of 6’ rather than 10 feet and a combined sideyard of 10’, rather than 15’. HPC granted a waiver from the Residential Design Standards related to Secondary Mass and Building Elements. 1. As stated in HPC Resolution #3, Series of 2015, for the temporary relocation of the Victorian house during basement excavation, the owner must provide a $30,000 letter of credit, cashier’s check, or other form acceptable to the City Attorney to insure the safe relocation of the house. A relocation plan detailing how and where the building will be stored and protected during construction must be submitted with the building permit application, and the applicant shall include documentation of the existing elevation of the home and the relationship of the foundation to grade in the building permit application. 2. The development approvals granted herein shall constitute a site-specific development plan vested for a period of three (3) years from the date of issuance of a development order. However, any failure to abide by any of the terms and conditions attendant to this approval shall result in the forfeiture of said vested property rights. Unless otherwise exempted or extended, failure to properly record all plats and agreements required to be recorded, as specified herein, within 180 days of the effective date of the development order shall also result in the forfeiture of said vested property rights and shall render the development order void within the meaning of Section 26.104.050 (Void permits). Zoning that is not part of the approved site-specific development plan shall not result in the creation of a vested property right. No later than fourteen (14) days following final approval of all requisite reviews necessary to obtain a development order as set forth in this Ordinance, the City Clerk shall cause to be published in a newspaper of general circulation within the jurisdictional boundaries of the City of Aspen, a notice advising the general public of the approval of a site specific development plan and creation of a vested property right pursuant to this Title. Such notice shall be substantially in the following form: Notice is hereby given to the general public of the approval of a site specific development plan, and the creation of a vested property right, valid for a period of three (3) years, pursuant to the Land Use Code of the City of Aspen and Title 24, Article 68, Colorado Revised Statutes, pertaining to the following described property: 232 E. Bleeker Street, Lots R and S, Block 72, City and Townsite of Aspen, Colorado . P60 III.D. HPC Review 2.11.15 232 E. Bleeker Page 5 of 7 Nothing in this approval shall exempt the development order from subsequent reviews and approvals required by this approval of the general rules, regulations and ordinances or the City of Aspen provided that such reviews and approvals are not inconsistent with this approval. The approval granted hereby shall be subject to all rights of referendum and judicial review; the period of time permitted by law for the exercise of such rights shall not begin to run until the date of publication of the notice of final development approval as required under Section 26.304.070(A). The rights of referendum shall be limited as set forth in the Colorado Constitution and the Aspen Home Rule Charter. EXHIBITS : Exhibit A: Design Guidelines Exhibit B: Application Exhibit A: Relevant HPC Design Guidelines, Final review 1.3 A new replacement fence should have a “transparent” quality allowing views into the yard from the street. A fence that defines a front yard is usually low to the ground and "transparent" in nature. On residential properties, a fence which is located forward of the front building facade may not be taller than 42" from natural grade. (For additional information, see the City of Aspen's "Residential Design Standards".) A privacy fence may be used in back yards and along alleys, but not forward of the front facade of a building. Note that using no fencing at all is often the best approach. Contemporary interpretations of traditional fences should be compatible with the historic context. 1.4 New fence components should be similar in scale with those seen traditionally. Fence columns or piers should be proportional to the fence segment. 1.9 Maintain the established progression of public-to-private spaces when considering a rehabilitation project. This includes a sequence of experiences, beginning with the "public" sidewalk, proceeding along a "semi-public" walkway, to a "semi-private" porch or entry feature and ending in the "private" spaces beyond. Provide a walkway running perpendicular from the street to the front entry. Meandering walkways are discouraged, except where it is needed to avoid a tree. Use paving materials that are similar to those used historically for the building style. Concrete, wood or sandstone may be appropriate for certain building styles. 1.10 Preserve historic elements of the yard to provide an appropriate context for historic structures. The front yard should be maintained in a traditional manner, with planting material and sod, and not covered with paving, for example. P61 III.D. HPC Review 2.11.15 232 E. Bleeker Page 6 of 7 1.11 Preserve and maintain mature landscaping on site, particularly landmark trees and shrubs. Protect established vegetation during construction to avoid damage. Replacement of damaged, aged or diseased trees must be approved by the Parks Department. If a tree must be removed as part of the addition or alteration, replace it with species of a large enough scale to have a visual impact in the early years of the project. 1.12 Preserve and maintain historically significant planting designs. Retaining historic planting beds, landscape features and walkways is encouraged. 1.13 Revisions or additions to the landscape should be consistent with the historic context of the site. Select plant and tree material according to its mature size, to allow for the long-term impact of mature growth. Reserve the use of exotic plants to small areas for accent. Do not cover grassy areas with gravel, rock or paving materials. 1.14 Additions to the landscape that could interfere with historic structures are inappropriate. Do not plant climbing ivy or trees too close to a building. New trees should be no closer than the mature canopy size. Do not locate plants or trees in locations that will obscure significant architectural features or block views to the building. It is not appropriate to plant a hedge row that will block views into the yard. 1.15 Minimize the visual impacts of site lighting. Site lighting should be shielded to avoid glare onto adjacent properties. Focus lighting on walks and entries, rather than up into trees and onto facade planes. 10.3 Design a new addition such that one's ability to interpret the historic character of the primary building is maintained. A new addition that creates an appearance inconsistent with the historic character of the primary building is inappropriate. An addition that seeks to imply an earlier period than that of the primary building also is inappropriate. An addition that seeks to imply an inaccurate variation of the primary building's historic style should be avoided. An addition that covers historically significant features is inappropriate. 10.4 Design a new addition to be recognized as a product of its own time. An addition should be made distinguishable from the historic building, while also remaining visually compatible with these earlier features. A change in setbacks of the addition from the historic building, a subtle change in material or a differentiation between historic, and more current styles are all techniques that may be considered to help define a change from old to new construction. 10.11 On a new addition, use exterior materials that are compatible with the historic materials of the primary building. The new materials should be either similar or subordinate to the original materials. 14.6 Exterior lights should be simple in character and similar in color and intensity to that used traditionally. P62 III.D. HPC Review 2.11.15 232 E. Bleeker Page 7 of 7 The design of a fixture should be simple in form and detail. Exterior lighting must be approved by the HPC. All exterior light sources should have a low level of luminescence. 14.7 Minimize the visual impacts of site and architectural lighting. Unshielded, high intensity light sources and those which direct light upward will not be permitted. Shield lighting associated with service areas, parking lots and parking structures. Timers or activity switches may be required to prevent unnecessary sources of light by controlling the length of time that exterior lights are in use late at night. Do not wash an entire building facade in light. Avoid placing exposed light fixtures in highly visible locations, such as on the upper walls of buildings. Avoid duplicating fixtures. For example, do not use two fixtures that light the same area. P63 III.D. 802 E. Cooper Avenue, Suite 4 | Aspen, Colorado | 81611 | 970.925.2252       February  1,  2015           Amy  Simon   City  of  Aspen  Community  Development  Department   130  S  Galena  Street,  3rd  Floor   Aspen,  CO    81611       RE:    232  E  Bleeker  Ave    Historic/Modern  Duplex    Summary  Letter,  Final  Approval   Aspen,  Colorado   Parcel  ID:  2737-­‐0731-­‐6006       Dear  Amy.     Thank  you  for  your  continued  time  and  assistance  regarding  this  property  and  the   process  for  it’s  development.    This  property  is  located  in  the  R-­‐6,  Medium  density,   residential  zone  district.       The  following  information  will  address  final  review  guidelines  as  outlined  in  your   letter.         RELEVANT  DESIGN  REVIEW  SECTIONS      1.3    Replacement  Fence.    As  we  have  no  information  on  a  fence  on  the   property  with  the  original  home,  we  are  not  putting  up  a  fence.    We  prefer  to  leave   the  yard  open  to  the  street  to  keep  the  large,  open  yard  feel  of  this  corner  property.      1.9  Progression  of  Public  to  Private  spaces.    There  is  not  a  sidewalk  along   this  block.    We  are  replacing  a  brick  sidewalk  from  the  street  to  the  re-­‐furbished   entry  porch  to  progress  from  public  to  private  spaces.  The  sidewalk  will  run  straight     from  the  street  to  the  porch.    The  new  unit  facing  Monarch  will  receive  a  concrete  sidewalk,  running   straight  from  the  street  to  the  front  porch.         P64 III.D. 802 E. Cooper Avenue, Suite 4 | Aspen, Colorado | 81611 | 970.925.2252  1.10    Historic  Yard.    The  front  yard  of  the  historic  resource  will  not  have     any  additional  paving  elements  added  that  were  not  there  historically  (except,   perhaps,  the  extension  of  the  sidewalk  all  the  way  to  the  street).    The  large,   expansive  front  yard  will  be  maintained,  with  flower  gardens  surrounding  the  entry   porch  and  grass  covering  the  rest  of  the  yard.    The  only  new  element  is  a  skylight   that  will  be  low  to  the  grass  and  surrounded  with  a  flower  garden.    This  element  is     set  well  behind  the  front  of  the  yard  and  is  surrounded  by  a  flower  garden.      1.11  Mature  landscaping.      The  mature  trees  that  are  remaining  on  the  lot   will  be  preserved.    The  City  took  out  the  two  large  cottonwoods  on  Bleeker,  and  will   replace  them  at  some  point.    After  meeting  with  the  City  forester,  we  adjusted  the   foot  print  of  our  project  to  protect  and  save  a  cottonwood  along  Monarch.      All  the   trees  on  the  property  will  be  protected  throughout  construction  with  fencing   marking  the  drip  line  boundary.        We  are  also  replacing  the  tulip  garden  around  the  entry  porch  of  the   Victorian  in  response  to  the  comments  of  a  long  time  neighbor.      1.13  Landscape  revisions  or  additions.    The  new  trees  to  be  planted  will   be  mid-­‐size;  to  not  compete  with  the  older  trees,  but  still  provide  a  sense  of     completeness  in  the  landscaping.    The  mature  size  of  the  new  trees  will  be  remain   smaller  than  the  cottonwoods  and  the  existing  pines  and  will  not  ever  become   a  visual  block  to  the  historic  resource.      The  large  grassy  expanse  will  be  maintained;  with  no  additional     pavers,  gravel  or  rock  pavers.          There  will  also  be  no  exotic  plants  on  the  property.      1.14  There  are  no  landscape  elements  proposed  for  the  property  that  will   be  either  close  to  the  home  (ie.  climbing  ivy  or  trees)  The  new  trees  will  be  around   the  perimeter  of  the  yard  with  no  chance  of  obscuring  view  of  the  home  from  the   public  right  of  way.    There  are  no  hedges  proposed  either.      1.15  Minimize  visual  impact  of  lighting.    The  exterior  lighting  planned  for     this  project  is  compliant  with  the  dark  sky  codes  of  the  City.    The  sconces  on  the     building  have  lights  that  are  shielded  from  view  and  project  light  in  a  small     area  at  the  front  porches  and  the  garage  doors.    There  are  small  lights  at  the     walkways  to  provide  light  from  the  street  to  the  front  porches  of  each  yard.   There  are  small,  traditional  style  landscape  lights  along  the  walk  to  the  Victorian   and  more  modern,  but  low  profile  lights  leading  to  the  modern  unit’s  entry.    See     attached  sheets.      10.3  Historic  character  of  Primary  building;  This  is  maintained  by  the   addition  of  the  new  unit  being  held  to  the  back  of  the  property  and  the  connecting   P65 III.D. 802 E. Cooper Avenue, Suite 4 | Aspen, Colorado | 81611 | 970.925.2252 link  of  a  single  story  being  over  18’  long,  pushing  the  addition  to  the  very  rear  of  the   lot.    The  restored,  historic  home  is  “front  and  center”  on  the  lot.    The  restoration   being  done  includes  removing  the  two  small  dormers  that  were  added  to  the  home   in  the  1980’s  on  the  east  side  of  the  main  gable.        The  new  addition  to  the  rear  of  the  historic  resource  has  been  designed  to     be  a  subordinate  element  on  the  property,    the  flat  roof    being  used  to  keep  the  mass   and  scale  to  an  appropriate  size  behind  the  story  and  a  half  Victorian.    The     fenestration  proportions  and  mullions  were  designed  to  reflect  the  fenestration     proportions  on  the  historic  building.      The  new  addition  in  no  way  tries  to  imply  a  time  period  of  the  past,  but  is  a     product  of  it’s  own  time;  with  modern  details  and  lines.    Neither  does  the  new   addition  try  to  imply  any  sort  of  variation  of  the  historic  building.    There  are  not  historically  significant  features  being  covered;  rather  a  very     serious  restoration  approach  is  being  taken  with  the  historic  home,  restoring  it  to     it’s  original  appearance.     10.4    The  new  addition  is  definitely  a  product  of  this  time;  it  is  set  apart  from  the     historic  resource  by  a  single  story  link.    This  link  is  set  back  from  the  rear  corners  of     the  historic  building,  exposing  the  actual  shape  and  foot  print  of  the  original   building;  the  link  will  have  a  different  material  than  the  horizontal  wood  siding  to     show  a  definite  change  in  time  eras.    The  new  unit  will  also  have  a  distinct  style   the  is  of  current  techniques  and  details.     10.11    The  new  unit  has  details  and  siding  that  are  similar  in  proportion  to  the   Victorian  ship  lap  siding,  but  have  a  more  modern  style.    The  majority  of  the  new   unit  has  butt  jointed,  wood  siding  that  will  have  the  same  dimension  as  the  Victorian   ship  lap.    The  wood  louvers  on  the  Monarch  side  of  the  new  unit  will  bring  down  the   scale  of  the  glass  and  screen  it  from  view  for  pedestrians  along  Monarch.    These   louvers  will  also  have  a  horizontal  dimension  that  is  similar  to  the  horizontal  wood   siding.     The  siding  on  the  link  will  be  ceramic  tile  that  looks  like  board  form  concrete;  so  the   color  will  be  light  and  the  perceived  scale  will  be  horizontal  and  slightly  wider  than   the  wood  ship  lap  siding.           The  wood  siding  on  the  entire  building  will  be  white,  to  help  tie  together  the  two   units  visually.    The  large  expanse  of  butt  joint  siding  will  be  the  back  drop  for  the     wood  louvers.    These  louvers  will  be  attached  as  a  rain  screen,  floating  in  front  of   both  the  glass  and  the  siding.    The  louvers  will  be  stained  a  charcoal  color.    The  color   palette  will  be  white  with  the  trim  and  windows  being  various  shades  of  grey.     14.6  The  lights  used  for  the  front  porch  and  walk  ways  to  the  Victorian  will  be  very   simple,  traditional  lights.    Since  we  do  not  know  exactly  what  lights  were  on  the   historic  building,  we  have  selected  wall  sconces  that  are  compatible  with  the  scale   P66 III.D. 802 E. Cooper Avenue, Suite 4 | Aspen, Colorado | 81611 | 970.925.2252 and  style  of  the  Victorian,  but  try  to  suggest  that  they  are  original.    The  landscape   lights  are  also  very  low  profile.     The  lights  on  the  modern  unit  are  simple,  modern  lights  that  are  compatible  with   the  style  of  that  unit.    The  color  will  blend  with  the  color  palette  of  the  siding  and     trim/details  of  that  unit.    Please  see  attached  photo.    The  wall  sconces  and  landscape   lights  at  this  unit  are  the  same  style;  though  the  landscape  lights  are  even  more   simple  and  low  profile.     All  of  the  lights  selected  are  ‘dark-­‐sky’  compliant  and  have  a  soft  luminescence.     14.7  There  will  be  no  unshielded  lights  on  the  property.    The  only  up-­‐lighting  will   be  a  couple,  very  low  wattage  lights  in  the  flooring  of  the  entry  porches,  under  the     porch  roofs  at  the  entries  of  both  units.    The  rest  of  the  lights  are  down  lights  and   have  shielded  bulbs.        There  are  no  lights  for  service  areas  or  parking,  just  the  wall  sconces     between  the  garage  doors  that  are  the  same  as  the  entry  porch  light  on  the     modern  unit.        The  wall  sconce  by  the  door  onto  the  deck  on  the  upper  level  of  the  modern   unit  has  concealed  bulbs  ,  that  will  not  be  visible  from  the  street.       Thank  you  for  your  time  and  consideration  of  the  final  materials,  landscape  and   lighting  selections  for  this  project.    We  look  forward  to  gaining  final  approval  so  we   can  work  with  our  assigned  monitor  through  the  construction  of  this  project.     Sincerely,         Kim  Raymond,  Principal   Kim  Raymond  Architects,  Inc   P67 III.D. Scale: ISSUE H I S T O R I C   M O D E R N   D U P L E X 2 3 2 E A S T B L E E K E R A V E N U E A S P E N , C O /Volumes/PROJECTS MASTER - MINI/232 BLEEKER/ PLNS/232 BLEEKER 1.4.15.pln HPC 1" ACTUAL IF THE ABOVE DIMENSION DOES NOT MEASURE ONE INCH (1") EXACTLY, THIS DRAWING WILL HAVE BEEN ENLARGED OR REDUCED, AFFECTING ALL LABELED SCALES. ALL DESIGNS, IDEAS ARRANGEMENTS AND PLANS I N D I C AT E D B Y T H E S E D R A W I N G S A N D SPECIFICATIONS ARE THE PROPERTY AND COPYRIGHT OF KIM RAYMOND ARCHITECTS, INC. AND SHALL NEITHER BE USED ON ANY OTHER WORK NOR BE USED BY ANY OTHER PERSON FOR ANY USE WHATSOEVER WITHOUT WRITTEN PERMISSION. WRITTEN DIMENSIONS SHALL TAKE PRECEDENCE OVER SCALED DIMENSIONS AND SHALL BE VERIFIED AT THE SITE. ANY DIMENSIONAL DISCREPANCY SHALL BE BROUGHT TO THE ATTENTION OF THE ARCHITECT PRIOR TO COMMENCEMENT OF WORK. AS NOTED DATE 7/23/14 3D 1/27/15 R E N D E R I N G S w w w . K i m R a y m o n d A r c h i t e c t s . c o m t e l   9 7 0 - ­ ‐ 9 2 5 - ­ ‐ 2 2 5 2     e m a i l   k i m @ k r a i . u s HPC FAR PARKING12/3/14 HPC MATERIALS1/6/15 HPC DORMERS1/27/15 EAST VIEW SCALE: 1:20 BLEEKER STREET WEST VIEW P 6 8 I I I . D . Scale: ISSUE H I S T O R I C   M O D E R N   D U P L E X 2 3 2 E A S T B L E E K E R A V E N U E A S P E N , C O /Volumes/PROJECTS MASTER - MINI/232 BLEEKER/ PLNS/232 BLEEKER 1.4.15.pln HPC 1" ACTUAL IF THE ABOVE DIMENSION DOES NOT MEASURE ONE INCH (1") EXACTLY, THIS DRAWING WILL HAVE BEEN ENLARGED OR REDUCED, AFFECTING ALL LABELED SCALES. ALL DESIGNS, IDEAS ARRANGEMENTS AND PLANS I N D I C AT E D B Y T H E S E D R A W I N G S A N D SPECIFICATIONS ARE THE PROPERTY AND COPYRIGHT OF KIM RAYMOND ARCHITECTS, INC. AND SHALL NEITHER BE USED ON ANY OTHER WORK NOR BE USED BY ANY OTHER PERSON FOR ANY USE WHATSOEVER WITHOUT WRITTEN PERMISSION. WRITTEN DIMENSIONS SHALL TAKE PRECEDENCE OVER SCALED DIMENSIONS AND SHALL BE VERIFIED AT THE SITE. ANY DIMENSIONAL DISCREPANCY SHALL BE BROUGHT TO THE ATTENTION OF THE ARCHITECT PRIOR TO COMMENCEMENT OF WORK. AS NOTED DATE 7/23/14 19 1/27/15 A E R I A L V I E W w w w . K i m R a y m o n d A r c h i t e c t s . c o m t e l   9 7 0 - ­ ‐ 9 2 5 - ­ ‐ 2 2 5 2     e m a i l   k i m @ k r a i . u s HPC FAR PARKING12/3/14 HPC MATERIALS1/6/15 HPC DORMERS1/27/15 1 AERIAL VIEW 3/8" = 1'-0" P 6 9 I I I . D . Scale: ISSUE H I S T O R I C   M O D E R N   D U P L E X 2 3 2 E A S T B L E E K E R A V E N U E A S P E N , C O /Volumes/PROJECTS MASTER - MINI/232 BLEEKER/ PLNS/232 BLEEKER 1.4.15.pln HPC 1" ACTUAL IF THE ABOVE DIMENSION DOES NOT MEASURE ONE INCH (1") EXACTLY, THIS DRAWING WILL HAVE BEEN ENLARGED OR REDUCED, AFFECTING ALL LABELED SCALES. ALL DESIGNS, IDEAS ARRANGEMENTS AND PLANS I N D I C AT E D B Y T H E S E D R A W I N G S A N D SPECIFICATIONS ARE THE PROPERTY AND COPYRIGHT OF KIM RAYMOND ARCHITECTS, INC. AND SHALL NEITHER BE USED ON ANY OTHER WORK NOR BE USED BY ANY OTHER PERSON FOR ANY USE WHATSOEVER WITHOUT WRITTEN PERMISSION. WRITTEN DIMENSIONS SHALL TAKE PRECEDENCE OVER SCALED DIMENSIONS AND SHALL BE VERIFIED AT THE SITE. ANY DIMENSIONAL DISCREPANCY SHALL BE BROUGHT TO THE ATTENTION OF THE ARCHITECT PRIOR TO COMMENCEMENT OF WORK. AS NOTED DATE 7/23/14 A 0.2 1/27/15 F A R P L A N S w w w . K i m R a y m o n d A r c h i t e c t s . c o m t e l   9 7 0 - ­ ‐ 9 2 5 - ­ ‐ 2 2 5 2     e m a i l   k i m @ k r a i . u s HPC FAR PARKING12/3/14 HPC MATERIALS1/6/15 HPC DORMERS1/27/15 08 08 W71 W6 9 W66 W67 11 09 09 W42 W7 4 W7 5 W7 9 W7 7 W65 08 W6 0 W5 7 W5 9 W5 7 W50 W49W49 W43 W44 W46 W63 W63 W5 6 W5 1 W5 5 W5 1 W5 5 W5 5 W6 3 W6 3 W61W63W62 07 W73 W72 14 A A B B A A C C FF 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 31 ' - 0 " 12 ' - 5 1 / 2 " 5' - 1 1 " 5 1 / 2 " 19 ' - 9 3 / 4 " 5 1 / 2 " 3' - 1 1 / 4 " 5 1 / 2 " 3'- 0 " 3 1/2"10'-4"3 1/2" 13'-9 3/4" 5 1/2"27'-3/4"5 1/2" 5 1/2"13'-10 3/4"5 1/2"21'-9 1/4"5 1/2"6'-4"5 1/2" 9'- 1 1 / 2 " 2' - 1 " 13 ' - 8 " 5 1 / 2 " 10 ' - 1 0 " 12'-8 1/4" 5'-10"6'-1 1/2"16'-1/2" 4' - 9 1 / 4 " 3 1 / 2 " 5' - 0 " 3 1 / 2 " 2' - 7 " 3' - 7 3 / 4 " 3'-9"6'-11 1/2"3'-6 3/4" 1' - 1 0 " 3' - 5 1 / 2 " 4' - 6 3 / 4 " 241 sq ft 334 sq ft PROPOSED NORTH / SOUTH FPTV FP MASTER BEDROOM MASTER CLOSET KITCHEN LIVING ROOM DINING DECK DECK PROPOSED SHED DORMER ACID ETCHED GLASS WALLAND BARN DOOR DEN GL A S S W I N E CA B I N E T OPEN TOENTRY BELOW OPEN TO BELOW 18R @ 7.5" DOWN DO W N GL A S S R A I L DECK ROOF ENTRY ROOF BELOW MASTER BATH VOID UNDERLOW ROOF VO I D U N D E R LO W R O O F ROOF OVER GARAGEBELOW ROOF OVERHANG @GARAGE BELOW BENCH STEAMSHOWER VO I D U N D E R LO W R O O F DRESSER VOID UNDERLOW ROOF 559 sq ft 987 sq ft W2 6 W2 5 W3 7 W3 6 W3 5 W3 3 W3 2 W3 1 W3 0 W3 4 W28 W27 08 W2 2 W2 3 W13W10 05 07 W2 4 07 0 7 W29 07 07 05 03 0707 06 06 03 03 04 04 06 W3 8 05 A A B B 2 1 4 1.7 F 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 891011121314 A A C C 3 1 / 2 " 4'-7"15'-2" 5 1/2"13'-4 3/4"7 1/2"13'-7"5 1/2"8'-6 1/2"6'-9" 5 1/2" 5 1 / 2 " 20 ' - 6 3 / 4 " 1' - 4 1 / 4 " 2' - 0 " 6'- 2 " 5 1 / 2 " 3'-7 1/2" 4' - 4 1 / 2 " 6' - 0 " 1' - 5 1 / 4 " 5 1/2"13'-7 1/2"2'-2" 16 ' - 3 3 / 4 " 5 1/2" 5'-3 1/2" 10 ' - 1 / 2 " 5 1 / 2 " 14 ' - 1 1 1 / 2 " 6'-11 1/4"5 1/2" 1'-11 1/4" 18 ' - 1 " 1'-11 1/4" 7 1/2"6'-5"5 1/2"6'-7 1/4"3 1/2"6'-8 1/2"3 1/2"12'-11"5 1/2" 1' - 0 " 1,268 sq ft 333 sq ft 222 sq ft 807 sq ft 336 sq ft 77 sq ft VICTORIAN GARAGE MODERN GARAGE POWDER MASTER BEDROOM ENTRY ENTRY ENTRY PORCH PATIO KITCHEN LIVING ROOM MASTER BATH STEAM SHOWER TUB FP A N D T V DOWN 2 STEPS CUBBIES BENCH TOTAL MAIN LEVEL 2180 SF FAR ENTRY PORCH CL O S E T SK Y L I G H T F O R RO O M B E L O W GLASS RAILING MASTER PATIO COATS BUFFET OPEN TREADS AND RISERS SI N G L E S T O R Y L I N K MAIN LEVEL 100'-0" =SITE 7897.7 DO W N UP PIVOT DOOR UP T.O. PLY MAIN LEVEL100'-0" DOWN WO O D P A N E L C L O S E T WI T H ' H I D D E N ' D O O R S OPEN RISERS LANDING POWDER CUBBIES open to above MASTER CLOSET FP A N D T V PARKING SPACE 1 8.5' X 18' PARKING SPACE 4 8.5' X 18' PARKING SPACE 3 PARKING SPACE 2 CUBBIES PANTRYBROOM WELL W/ CURB ENTRY LEVEL 101'-0" = SHRUBS SKYLIGHT2'-9" X 8' 3 13 13 11 11 12 1314 12 12 12 12 11 W5 W4 W6 W7 W8 1111 11 11 09 10 12 12 1312 10 10 12 11 W1 W2 W3 11 A A B B WD W D 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 910111213141516 A A C C 4' - 9 " 8" 9 1/2"11'-10 1/2"3 1/2"5'-1"5 1/2"5'-1"3 1/2"2'-4 1/2"11'-7 1/2"7'-6"9 1/2"1'-7" 4' - 9 " 4' - 9 " 3' - 1 0 " 5 1 / 2 " 3' - 0 " 4' - 9 " 5'-5"3 1/2"1'-8 1/4" 3' - 0 " 12'-11" 8"4'-9"8" 9 1/2"13'-7 3/4"5 1/2" 4'-3 3/4" 3 1/2" 11'-5 1/4"3 1/2"3'-4" 3' - 1 0 " 5 1 / 2 " 3 1 / 2 " 3' - 0 " 1/ 2 " 5'- 7 " 3 1 / 2 " 4' - 2 1 / 2 " 7 1 / 2 " 1,997 sq ft 1,735 sq ft LAUNDRY FAMILY ROOM MECH. GUEST SUITE BEDROOM 1 BEDROOM 2 BEDROOM 1 BEDROOM 2 GUEST SUITE FAMILY ROOM LAUNDRY STORAGE MECH. CLOS. CLG HEIGHT 9'-7 1/2" CLOS. CLOS.CLOS. CLOS. FI R E P L A C E A N D T V FIREPLACE AND TV BAR BAR T.O. SLAB LOWER LEVEL90'-0" 1896 + 2095 = 3991 X .099 = 395 SF FAR UPDOWN LANDING LINE OF EXTERIOR WALL ABOVE LI N E O F E X T E R I O R W A L L A B O V E BATH 1 BATH 2 BATH GS BATH GS FAMILY BATH BATH 1 BATH 2 POWDER SCALE: 1/8" = 1'-0" UPPER LEVEL FAR SCALE: 1/8" = 1'-0" MAIN LEVEL FARSCALE: 1/8" = 1'-0" LOWER LEVEL FAR LOWER FAR 298.5 SF MAIN FAR 2075 SF TOTAL FAR 4048 SF FAR SUMMARY LOWER FAR 1997 + 1735 =3732 x .08= 298.5 SF MAIN FAR 807 + 1268 =2075 V GARAGE 333-250=80/2=43 FAR M GARAGE 336-250= 71/2=50.5 TOTAL GARAGE FAR 43+50.5 = 93.5 ALL DECKS AT GRADE ARE EXEMPT UPPER FAR 987 + 559 = 1546 UPPER DECKS (TOTAL DECKS) 241 + 334 = 575 35 SQ FT COUNTS AS FAR R-6 ZONE DISTRICT ALLOWABLE FOR 6000 SQ FT LOT 3600 SQ FT FOR A DUPLEX WITH HPC BONUS 500 SQ FT = 4100 SQ FT DECK ALLOWANCE IS 15% OF 3600 =540 SQ FT GARAGES FAR 93.5 SF INTERIOR FAR 4013 SF DECK FAR 35 SF UPPER FAR 1546 SF P 7 0 I I I . D . Scale: ISSUE H I S T O R I C   M O D E R N   D U P L E X 2 3 2 E A S T B L E E K E R A V E N U E A S P E N , C O /Volumes/PROJECTS MASTER - MINI/232 BLEEKER/ PLNS/232 BLEEKER 1.4.15.pln HPC 1" ACTUAL IF THE ABOVE DIMENSION DOES NOT MEASURE ONE INCH (1") EXACTLY, THIS DRAWING WILL HAVE BEEN ENLARGED OR REDUCED, AFFECTING ALL LABELED SCALES. ALL DESIGNS, IDEAS ARRANGEMENTS AND PLANS I N D I C AT E D B Y T H E S E D R A W I N G S A N D SPECIFICATIONS ARE THE PROPERTY AND COPYRIGHT OF KIM RAYMOND ARCHITECTS, INC. AND SHALL NEITHER BE USED ON ANY OTHER WORK NOR BE USED BY ANY OTHER PERSON FOR ANY USE WHATSOEVER WITHOUT WRITTEN PERMISSION. WRITTEN DIMENSIONS SHALL TAKE PRECEDENCE OVER SCALED DIMENSIONS AND SHALL BE VERIFIED AT THE SITE. ANY DIMENSIONAL DISCREPANCY SHALL BE BROUGHT TO THE ATTENTION OF THE ARCHITECT PRIOR TO COMMENCEMENT OF WORK. AS NOTED DATE 7/23/14 A 1.0 1/27/15 S I T E P L A N w w w . K i m R a y m o n d A r c h i t e c t s . c o m t e l   9 7 0 - ­ ‐ 9 2 5 - ­ ‐ 2 2 5 2     e m a i l   k i m @ k r a i . u s HPC FAR PARKING12/3/14 HPC MATERIALS1/6/15 HPC DORMERS1/27/15 W 2 6 W 2 5 W 3 7 W 3 6 W 3 5 W 3 3 W 3 2 W 3 1 W 3 0 W 3 4 W2 8 W2 7 08 W 2 2 W 2 3 W1 3 W1 0 05 0 7 W 2 4 07 07 W2 9 07 0 7 05 03 07 07 06 0 6 0 3 0 3 04 04 0 6 W 3 8 0 5 A A B B 2 2 1 1 4 4 1 . 7 1. 7 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 1 0 1 1 1 2 1 3 1 4 A A C C 3 1 / 2 " 4' - 7 " 15 ' - 2 " 5 1 / 2 " 3 ' - 7 1 / 2 " 1 0 ' - 0 " 5 1 / 2 " 1 3 ' - 7 1 / 2 " 2' - 2 " 1 6 ' - 3 3 / 4 " 5 1 / 2 " 5' - 3 1 / 2 " 6 ' - 1 1 1 / 4 " 5 1 / 2 " 1' - 1 1 1 / 4 " 1 8 ' - 1 " 8 ' - 6 " 5 9 ' - 1 0 " 5 ' - 0 " 1 0 ' - 0 " 5 ' - 0 " 1 0 0 ' - 0 " 4 ' - 0 " 5 ' - 0 " 5 ' - 0 " 5 ' - 0 " 3 ' - 9 " 1 0 ' - 1 / 2 " 3 ' - 9 " 1' - 3 " 1 ' - 1 1 1 / 4 " 7 1 / 2 " 6' - 5 " 5 1 / 2 " 6 ' - 7 1 / 4 " 3 1 / 2 " 6' - 8 1 / 2 " 3 1 / 2 " 12 ' - 1 1 " 5 1 / 2 " 8' - 1 " 2' - 9 " C O T T O N W O O D 11 " D I A . 11 ' D I A . D . L . V I C T O R I A N G A R A G E M O D E R N G A R A G E PO W D E R M A S T E R B E D R O O M E N T R Y EN T R Y E N T R Y P O R C H P A T I O K I T C H E N L I V I N G R O O M MA S T E R BA T H ST E A M SH O W E R TU B F P A N D T V DO W N 2 S T E P S CU B B I E S BE N C H EN T R Y P O R C H B L O C K 7 2 A L L E Y CO T T O N W O O D 27 " D I A . 25 ' D I A . D . L . CO T T O N W O O D 46 " D I A . 28 ' D I A . D . L . CO T T O N W O O D 38 " D I A . 22 ' D I A . D . L . B L E E K E R S T R E E T M O N A R C H S T R E E T 10 ' F R O N T Y A R D S E T B A C K 5 ' S I D E Y A R D S E T B A C K P R O P E R T Y L I N E C L O S E T S K Y L I G H T F O R R O O M B E L O W GL A S S R A I L I N G MA S T E R P A T I O CO A T S E N T R Y W A L K BU F F E T OP E N T R E A D S AN D R I S E R S EX I S T I N G C O N C R E T E D R I V E W A Y T O B E R E M O V E D S I N G L E S T O R Y L I N K MA I N L E V E L 1 0 0 ' - 0 " = SI T E 7 8 9 7 . 7 D O W N U P PI V O T D O O R UP T. O . P L Y M A I N L E V E L 10 0 ' - 0 " DO W N W O O D P A N E L C L O S E T W I T H ' H I D D E N ' D O O R S OP E N R I S E R S LA N D I N G PO W D E R CU B B I E S op e n to ab o v e M A I N L E V E L 1 0 0 ' - 0 " = SI T E 7 8 9 7 . 7 MA S T E R C L O S E T F P A N D T V P A R K I N G SP A C E 1 8 . 5 ' X 1 8 ' P A R K I N G SP A C E 4 8 . 5 ' X 1 8 ' PA R K I N G S P A C E 3 P A R K I N G S P A C E 2 5 ' S I D E Y A R D S E T B A C K 5' R E A R Y A R D S E T B A C K CU B B I E S PA N T R Y B R O O M W E L L W / CU R B EN T R Y L E V E L 10 1 ' - 0 " = SH R U B S SK Y L I G H T 2 ' - 9 " X 8 ' 2 5 5 s q f t 3 3 1 3 1 3 P 7 1 I I I . D . Scale: ISSUE H I S T O R I C   M O D E R N   D U P L E X 2 3 2 E A S T B L E E K E R A V E N U E A S P E N , C O /Volumes/PROJECTS MASTER - MINI/232 BLEEKER/ PLNS/232 BLEEKER 1.4.15.pln HPC 1" ACTUAL IF THE ABOVE DIMENSION DOES NOT MEASURE ONE INCH (1") EXACTLY, THIS DRAWING WILL HAVE BEEN ENLARGED OR REDUCED, AFFECTING ALL LABELED SCALES. ALL DESIGNS, IDEAS ARRANGEMENTS AND PLANS I N D I C AT E D B Y T H E S E D R A W I N G S A N D SPECIFICATIONS ARE THE PROPERTY AND COPYRIGHT OF KIM RAYMOND ARCHITECTS, INC. AND SHALL NEITHER BE USED ON ANY OTHER WORK NOR BE USED BY ANY OTHER PERSON FOR ANY USE WHATSOEVER WITHOUT WRITTEN PERMISSION. WRITTEN DIMENSIONS SHALL TAKE PRECEDENCE OVER SCALED DIMENSIONS AND SHALL BE VERIFIED AT THE SITE. ANY DIMENSIONAL DISCREPANCY SHALL BE BROUGHT TO THE ATTENTION OF THE ARCHITECT PRIOR TO COMMENCEMENT OF WORK. AS NOTED DATE 7/23/14 A 1.1 1/27/15 E X I S T I N G S I T E P L A N w w w . K i m R a y m o n d A r c h i t e c t s . c o m t e l   9 7 0 - ­ ‐ 9 2 5 - ­ ‐ 2 2 5 2     e m a i l   k i m @ k r a i . u s HPC FAR PARKING12/3/14 HPC MATERIALS1/6/15 HPC DORMERS1/27/15 1 0 ' - 0 " 5 ' - 7 1 / 4 " 7 8 9 8 L O T Q L O T S L O T R P R O P E R T Y L I N E 1 0 ' F R O N T Y A R D S E T B A C K L O T S I Z E : 5 , 9 8 3 S Q F T 5 ' S I D E Y A R D S E T B A C K 5 ' S I D E Y A R D S E T B A C K 1 0 ' H A B I T A B L E R E A R Y A R D S E T B A C K P R O P E R T Y L I N E P R O P E R T Y L I N E B L E E K E R S T R E E T M O N A R C H S T R E E T B L O C K 7 2 A L L E Y P R O P E R T Y L I N E 7 8 9 8 7 8 9 7 78 9 7 7 8 9 8 7 8 9 8 7 8 9 9 7 8 9 9 C O T T O N W O O D 27 " D I A . 25 ' D I A . D . L . N C O T T O N W O O D 4 6 " D I A . 2 8 ' D I A . D . L . C O T T O N W O O D 3 8 " D I A . 2 2 ' D I A . D . L . C O T T O N W O O D S 12 " D I A . / 1 4 " D I A . 20 ' D I A . D . L . TO T A L M A P L E S 8 " D I A . / 1 0 " D I A . 2 0 ' D I A . D . L . T O T A L C O T T O N W O O D 5 " D I A . 9 ' D I A . D . L . A S P E N 3" D I A . 6' D I A . D . L . S P R U C E 1 2 " D I A . 1 6 ' D I A . D . L . SP R U C E 10 " D I A . 15 ' D I A . D . L . S P R U C E 1 6 " D I A . 2 0 ' D I A . D . L . A S P E N S 3 " D I A . / 3 " D I A . 8 ' D I A . D . L . TO T A L AS P E N 4" D I A . 6' D I A . D . L . C O T T O N W O O D 11 " D I A . 11 ' D I A . D . L . A S P E N 4" D I A . 8 ' D I A . D . L . 5 ' G A R A G E R E A R Y A R D S E T B A C K A S P E N 6 " D I A . 8 ' D I A . D . L . AS P E N S 1" D I A . / 3 " D I A . 8' D I A . D . L . TO T A L A S P E N 5 " D I A . 8 ' D I A . D . L . AS P E N 5" D I A . 8' D I A . D . L . A S P E N 4 " D I A . 8 ' D I A . D . L . A S P E N 3 " D I A . 8 ' D I A . D . L . AS P E N S 6" D I A . / 3 " DI A . 8' D I A . D . L . TO T A L SCALE: 1" = 5'-0" P 7 2 I I I . D . Scale: ISSUE H I S T O R I C   M O D E R N   D U P L E X 2 3 2 E A S T B L E E K E R A V E N U E A S P E N , C O /Volumes/PROJECTS MASTER - MINI/232 BLEEKER/ PLNS/232 BLEEKER 1.4.15.pln HPC 1" ACTUAL IF THE ABOVE DIMENSION DOES NOT MEASURE ONE INCH (1") EXACTLY, THIS DRAWING WILL HAVE BEEN ENLARGED OR REDUCED, AFFECTING ALL LABELED SCALES. ALL DESIGNS, IDEAS ARRANGEMENTS AND PLANS I N D I C AT E D B Y T H E S E D R A W I N G S A N D SPECIFICATIONS ARE THE PROPERTY AND COPYRIGHT OF KIM RAYMOND ARCHITECTS, INC. AND SHALL NEITHER BE USED ON ANY OTHER WORK NOR BE USED BY ANY OTHER PERSON FOR ANY USE WHATSOEVER WITHOUT WRITTEN PERMISSION. WRITTEN DIMENSIONS SHALL TAKE PRECEDENCE OVER SCALED DIMENSIONS AND SHALL BE VERIFIED AT THE SITE. ANY DIMENSIONAL DISCREPANCY SHALL BE BROUGHT TO THE ATTENTION OF THE ARCHITECT PRIOR TO COMMENCEMENT OF WORK. AS NOTED DATE 7/23/14 A 1.2 1/27/15 S I T E C O V E R A G E w w w . K i m R a y m o n d A r c h i t e c t s . c o m t e l   9 7 0 - ­ ‐ 9 2 5 - ­ ‐ 2 2 5 2     e m a i l   k i m @ k r a i . u s HPC FAR PARKING12/3/14 HPC MATERIALS1/6/15 HPC DORMERS1/27/15 W 2 6 W 2 5 W 3 7 W 3 6 W 3 5 W 3 3 W 3 2 W 3 1 W 3 0 W 3 4 W2 8 W2 7 08 W 2 2 W 2 3 W1 3 W1 0 05 0 7 W 2 4 07 07 W2 9 07 0 7 05 03 07 07 06 0 6 0 3 0 3 04 04 0 6 W 3 8 0 5 A A B B 2 2 1 1 4 4 1 . 7 1. 7 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 1 0 1 1 1 2 1 3 1 4 A A C C 3 1 / 2 " 4' - 7 " 15 ' - 2 " 5 1 / 2 " 3 ' - 7 1 / 2 " 1 0 ' - 0 " 5 1 / 2 " 1 3 ' - 7 1 / 2 " 2' - 2 " 1 6 ' - 3 3 / 4 " 5 1 / 2 " 5 ' - 3 1 / 2 " 6 ' - 1 1 1 / 4 " 5 1 / 2 " 1 ' - 1 1 1 / 4 " 1 8 ' - 1 " 8 ' - 6 " 5 9 ' - 1 0 " 5' - 0 " 1 0 ' - 0 " 5' - 0 " 1 0 0 ' - 0 " 4 ' - 0 " 5 ' - 0 " 5 ' - 0 " 5 ' - 0 " 3 ' - 9 " 1 0 ' - 1 / 2 " 3' - 9 " 1' - 3 " 1 ' - 1 1 1 / 4 " 7 1 / 2 " 6' - 5 " 5 1 / 2 " 6' - 7 1 / 4 " 3 1 / 2 " 6' - 8 1 / 2 " 3 1 / 2 " 12 ' - 1 1 " 5 1 / 2 " 8' - 1 " 2' - 9 " 77 s q f t 46 s q f t 22 s q f t 22 s q f t 22 s q f t 22 s q f t 22 s q f t 15 6 s q f t 22 s q f t C O T T O N W O O D 11 " D I A . 11 ' D I A . D . L . LOT COVERAGE: 333 + 336 + 807 + 1268 LIVING AREA COVERAGE: 2744 SF SKYLIGHT ELEMENT COVERAGE: 46 SF TOTAL LOT COVERAGE: 2790 SF TOTAL LOT AREA: 5983 SF LOT COVERAGE: 2790/5983 SF = 46.6% WINDOW WELLS (6)X22 = WINDOW WELLS COVERAGE: 132 SF (not included in coverage calcs) VI C T O R I A N G A R A G E M O D E R N G A R A G E P O W D E R M A S T E R B E D R O O M EN T R Y EN T R Y EN T R Y P O R C H P A T I O K I T C H E N L I V I N G R O O M M A S T E R B A T H ST E A M SH O W E R TU B F P A N D T V DO W N 2 S T E P S CU B B I E S BE N C H EN T R Y P O R C H BL O C K 7 2 A L L E Y CO T T O N W O O D 27 " D I A . 25 ' D I A . D . L . CO T T O N W O O D 46 " D I A . 28 ' D I A . D . L . C O T T O N W O O D 38 " D I A . 22 ' D I A . D . L . B L E E K E R S T R E E T M O N A R C H S T R E E T 10 ' F R O N T Y A R D S E T B A C K 5 ' S I D E Y A R D S E T B A C K P R O P E R T Y L I N E C L O S E T S K Y L I G H T F O R R O O M B E L O W GL A S S R A I L I N G M A S T E R P A T I O CO A T S E N T R Y W A L K BU F F E T OP E N T R E A D S AN D R I S E R S EX I S T I N G C O N C R E T E D R I V E W A Y T O BE R E M O V E D S I N G L E S T O R Y L I N K MA I N L E V E L 1 0 0 ' - 0 " = SI T E 7 8 9 7 . 7 D O W N U P PI V O T D O O R UP T. O . P L Y M A I N L E V E L 10 0 ' - 0 " DO W N W O O D P A N E L C L O S E T W I T H ' H I D D E N ' D O O R S OP E N R I S E R S LA N D I N G P O W D E R C U B B I E S op e n to ab o v e MA I N L E V E L 1 0 0 ' - 0 " = SI T E 7 8 9 7 . 7 MA S T E R C L O S E T F P A N D T V PA R K I N G SP A C E 1 8 . 5 ' X 1 8 ' PA R K I N G SP A C E 4 8 . 5 ' X 1 8 ' P A R K I N G S P A C E 3 PA R K I N G S P A C E 2 5 ' S I D E Y A R D S E T B A C K 5' R E A R Y A R D S E T B A C K CU B B I E S PA N T R Y BR O O M WE L L W/ C U R B EN T R Y L E V E L 10 1 ' - 0 " = S H R U B S SK Y L I G H T 2 ' - 9 " X 8 ' 25 5 s q f t 3 3 1 3 1 3 1 L O T C O V E R A G E 3 / 1 6 " = 1 ' - 0 " P 7 3 I I I . D . Scale: ISSUE H I S T O R I C   M O D E R N   D U P L E X 2 3 2 E A S T B L E E K E R A V E N U E A S P E N , C O /Volumes/PROJECTS MASTER - MINI/232 BLEEKER/ PLNS/232 BLEEKER 1.4.15.pln HPC 1" ACTUAL IF THE ABOVE DIMENSION DOES NOT MEASURE ONE INCH (1") EXACTLY, THIS DRAWING WILL HAVE BEEN ENLARGED OR REDUCED, AFFECTING ALL LABELED SCALES. ALL DESIGNS, IDEAS ARRANGEMENTS AND PLANS I N D I C AT E D B Y T H E S E D R A W I N G S A N D SPECIFICATIONS ARE THE PROPERTY AND COPYRIGHT OF KIM RAYMOND ARCHITECTS, INC. AND SHALL NEITHER BE USED ON ANY OTHER WORK NOR BE USED BY ANY OTHER PERSON FOR ANY USE WHATSOEVER WITHOUT WRITTEN PERMISSION. WRITTEN DIMENSIONS SHALL TAKE PRECEDENCE OVER SCALED DIMENSIONS AND SHALL BE VERIFIED AT THE SITE. ANY DIMENSIONAL DISCREPANCY SHALL BE BROUGHT TO THE ATTENTION OF THE ARCHITECT PRIOR TO COMMENCEMENT OF WORK. AS NOTED DATE 7/23/14 A 2.1 1/27/15 L O W E R L E V E L F L O O R P L A N w w w . K i m R a y m o n d A r c h i t e c t s . c o m t e l   9 7 0 - ­ ‐ 9 2 5 - ­ ‐ 2 2 5 2     e m a i l   k i m @ k r a i . u s HPC FAR PARKING12/3/14 HPC MATERIALS1/6/15 HPC DORMERS1/27/15 1 1 11 12 13 14 1 2 1 2 1 2 1 2 1 1 W 5 W 4 W 6 W 7 W 8 11 11 11 11 09 10 1 2 12 13 12 1 0 10 12 1 1 W1 W 2 W 3 11 A A B B 2 2 1 1 4 4 W D W D 1 . 7 1. 7 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 1 0 1 1 1 2 1 3 1 4 1 5 1 6 A A C C 4 ' - 9 " 8 " 3 4 ' - 1 / 2 " 3 1 / 2 " 3 0 ' - 1 0 " 5 1 / 2 " 1 3 ' - 2 3 / 4 " 9 1 / 2 " 9 1 / 2 " 1 1 ' - 1 0 1 / 2 " 3 1 / 2 " 5 ' - 1 " 5 1 / 2 " 5 ' - 1 " 3 1 / 2 " 2' - 4 1 / 2 " 1 1 ' - 7 1 / 2 " 7 ' - 6 " 9 1 / 2 " 1' - 7 " 4 ' - 9 " 4 ' - 9 " 3 ' - 1 0 " 5 1 / 2 " 3 ' - 0 " 4 ' - 9 " 5' - 5 " 3 1 / 2 " 1' - 8 1 / 4 " 9 1 / 2 " 1 1 ' - 1 1 3 / 4 " 3 1 / 2 " 9 ' - 7 1 / 2 " 3 1 / 2 " 1 1 ' - 4 3 / 4 " 5 1 / 2 " 1 4 ' - 4 1 / 2 " 7 1 / 2 " 1 1 ' - 1 / 4 " 5 1 / 2 " 3 ' - 1 0 " 5 1 / 2 " 1 3 ' - 2 3 / 4 " 9 1 / 2 " 3 ' - 0 " 12 ' - 1 1 " 8" 4' - 9 " 8" 9 1 / 2 " 1 3 ' - 7 3 / 4 " 5 1 / 2 " 4' - 3 3 / 4 " 3 1 / 2 " 1 1 ' - 5 1 / 4 " 3 1 / 2 " 3 ' - 4 " 3 ' - 1 0 " 5 1 / 2 " 3 1 / 2 " 3 ' - 0 " 1 / 2 " 5 ' - 7 " 3 1 / 2 " 4 ' - 2 1 / 2 " 7 1 / 2 " L A U N D R Y F A M I L Y R O O M M E C H . G U E S T S U I T E B E D R O O M 1 B E D R O O M 2 B E D R O O M 1 B E D R O O M 2 G U E S T S U I T E FA M I L Y R O O M LA U N D R Y S T O R A G E M E C H . C L O S . CL G H E I G H T 9 ' - 7 1 / 2 " CL O S . C L O S . C L O S . C L O S . F I R E P L A C E A N D T V FI R E P L A C E A N D T V B A R B A R T . O . S L A B L O W E R L E V E L 90 ' - 0 " UP DO W N LA N D I N G LI N E O F E X T E R I O R W A L L A B O V E L I N E O F E X T E R I O R W A L L A B O V E B A T H 1 B A T H 2 B A T H G S B A T H G S FA M I L Y B A T H B A T H 1 BA T H 2 P O W D E R 3 3 P 7 4 I I I . D . Scale: ISSUE H I S T O R I C   M O D E R N   D U P L E X 2 3 2 E A S T B L E E K E R A V E N U E A S P E N , C O /Volumes/PROJECTS MASTER - MINI/232 BLEEKER/ PLNS/232 BLEEKER 1.4.15.pln HPC 1" ACTUAL IF THE ABOVE DIMENSION DOES NOT MEASURE ONE INCH (1") EXACTLY, THIS DRAWING WILL HAVE BEEN ENLARGED OR REDUCED, AFFECTING ALL LABELED SCALES. ALL DESIGNS, IDEAS ARRANGEMENTS AND PLANS I N D I C AT E D B Y T H E S E D R A W I N G S A N D SPECIFICATIONS ARE THE PROPERTY AND COPYRIGHT OF KIM RAYMOND ARCHITECTS, INC. AND SHALL NEITHER BE USED ON ANY OTHER WORK NOR BE USED BY ANY OTHER PERSON FOR ANY USE WHATSOEVER WITHOUT WRITTEN PERMISSION. WRITTEN DIMENSIONS SHALL TAKE PRECEDENCE OVER SCALED DIMENSIONS AND SHALL BE VERIFIED AT THE SITE. ANY DIMENSIONAL DISCREPANCY SHALL BE BROUGHT TO THE ATTENTION OF THE ARCHITECT PRIOR TO COMMENCEMENT OF WORK. AS NOTED DATE 7/23/14 A 2.2 1/27/15 M A I N L E V E L F L O O R P L A N w w w . K i m R a y m o n d A r c h i t e c t s . c o m t e l   9 7 0 - ­ ‐ 9 2 5 - ­ ‐ 2 2 5 2     e m a i l   k i m @ k r a i . u s HPC FAR PARKING12/3/14 HPC MATERIALS1/6/15 HPC DORMERS1/27/15 W 2 6 W 2 5 W 3 7 W 3 6 W 3 5 W 3 3 W 3 2 W 3 1 W 3 0 W 3 4 W2 8 W2 7 08 W 2 2 W 2 3 W1 3 W1 0 05 0 7 W 2 4 07 07 W2 9 07 0 7 05 03 07 07 06 0 6 0 3 0 3 04 04 0 6 W 3 8 0 5 A A B B 2 2 1 1 4 4 1 . 7 1. 7 F 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 1 0 1 1 1 2 1 3 1 4 A A C C 5 1 / 2 " 1 3 ' - 4 3 / 4 " 7 1 / 2 " 13 ' - 7 " 5 1 / 2 " 8' - 6 1 / 2 " 6 ' - 9 " 5 1 / 2 " 2 0 ' - 6 3 / 4 " 1 ' - 4 1 / 4 " 2 ' - 0 " 6 ' - 2 " 5 1 / 2 " 1 0 ' - 0 " 4 ' - 4 1 / 2 " 6 ' - 0 " 1 ' - 5 1 / 4 " 5 1 / 2 " 1 3 ' - 7 1 / 2 " 2 ' - 2 " 1 6 ' - 3 3 / 4 " 5 ' - 3 1 / 2 " 1 0 ' - 1 / 2 " 5 1 / 2 " 1 4 ' - 1 1 1 / 2 " 1 0 ' - 1 / 2 " 3 ' - 9 " 1 ' - 3 " 1 ' - 1 1 1 / 4 " 7 1 / 2 " 6 ' - 5 " 5 1 / 2 " 6 ' - 7 1 / 4 " 3 1 / 2 " 6' - 8 1 / 2 " 3 1 / 2 " 12 ' - 1 1 " 5 1 / 2 " 1 ' - 0 " 8' - 1 " 2' - 9 " V I C T O R I A N G A R A G E M O D E R N G A R A G E P O W D E R M A S T E R B E D R O O M E N T R Y E N T R Y E N T R Y P O R C H P A T I O K I T C H E N LI V I N G R O O M M A S T E R B A T H S T E A M S H O W E R TU B F P A N D T V DO W N 2 S T E P S CU B B I E S BE N C H E N T R Y P O R C H C L O S E T S K Y L I G H T F O R R O O M B E L O W GL A S S R A I L I N G M A S T E R P A T I O C O A T S E N T R Y W A L K BU F F E T O P E N T R E A D S A N D R I S E R S E X I S T I N G C O N C R E T E D R I V E W A Y T O B E R E M O V E D S I N G L E S T O R Y L I N K MA I N L E V E L 1 0 0 ' - 0 " = SI T E 7 8 9 7 . 7 D O W N U P PI V O T D O O R UP T. O . P L Y M A I N L E V E L 1 0 0 ' - 0 " D O W N W O O D P A N E L C L O S E T W I T H ' H I D D E N ' D O O R S O P E N R I S E R S LA N D I N G P O W D E R CU B B I E S op e n to ab o v e M A I N L E V E L 1 0 0 ' - 0 " = SI T E 7 8 9 7 . 7 M A S T E R C L O S E T F P A N D T V P A R K I N G S P A C E 1 8 . 5 ' X 1 8 ' P A R K I N G S P A C E 4 8 . 5 ' X 1 8 ' P A R K I N G S P A C E 3 P A R K I N G S P A C E 2 CU B B I E S PA N T R Y BR O O M W E L L W / C U R B EN T R Y L E V E L 10 1 ' - 0 " = S H R U B S SK Y L I G H T 2 ' - 9 " X 8 ' 3 3 1 3 1 3 P 7 5 I I I . D . Scale: ISSUE H I S T O R I C   M O D E R N   D U P L E X 2 3 2 E A S T B L E E K E R A V E N U E A S P E N , C O /Volumes/PROJECTS MASTER - MINI/232 BLEEKER/ PLNS/232 BLEEKER 1.4.15.pln HPC 1" ACTUAL IF THE ABOVE DIMENSION DOES NOT MEASURE ONE INCH (1") EXACTLY, THIS DRAWING WILL HAVE BEEN ENLARGED OR REDUCED, AFFECTING ALL LABELED SCALES. ALL DESIGNS, IDEAS ARRANGEMENTS AND PLANS I N D I C AT E D B Y T H E S E D R A W I N G S A N D SPECIFICATIONS ARE THE PROPERTY AND COPYRIGHT OF KIM RAYMOND ARCHITECTS, INC. AND SHALL NEITHER BE USED ON ANY OTHER WORK NOR BE USED BY ANY OTHER PERSON FOR ANY USE WHATSOEVER WITHOUT WRITTEN PERMISSION. WRITTEN DIMENSIONS SHALL TAKE PRECEDENCE OVER SCALED DIMENSIONS AND SHALL BE VERIFIED AT THE SITE. ANY DIMENSIONAL DISCREPANCY SHALL BE BROUGHT TO THE ATTENTION OF THE ARCHITECT PRIOR TO COMMENCEMENT OF WORK. AS NOTED DATE 7/23/14 A 2.3 1/27/15 U P P E R L E V E L F L O O R P L A N w w w . K i m R a y m o n d A r c h i t e c t s . c o m t e l   9 7 0 - ­ ‐ 9 2 5 - ­ ‐ 2 2 5 2     e m a i l   k i m @ k r a i . u s HPC FAR PARKING12/3/14 HPC MATERIALS1/6/15 HPC DORMERS1/27/15 0 8 0 8 W7 1 W 6 9 W 6 6 W6 7 1 1 09 09 W 4 2 W 7 4 W 7 5 W 7 9 W 7 7 W 6 5 08 W 6 0 W 5 7 W 5 9 W 5 7 W5 0 W4 9 W4 9 W 4 3 W4 4 W 4 6 W 6 3 W6 3 W 5 6 W 5 1 W 5 5 W 5 1 W 5 5 W 5 5 W 6 3 W 6 3 W6 1 W6 3 W6 2 07 W7 3 W7 2 1 4 A A B B 2 2 1 1 4 4 1. 7 1 . 7 A A C C F F 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 3 1 ' - 0 " 1 2 ' - 5 1 / 2 " 5 ' - 1 1 " 5 1 / 2 " 1 9 ' - 9 3 / 4 " 5 1 / 2 " 3 ' - 1 1 / 4 " 5 1 / 2 " 3 ' - 0 " 3 1 / 2 " 10 ' - 4 " 3 1 / 2 " 1 3 ' - 9 3 / 4 " 5 1 / 2 " 27 ' - 3 / 4 " 5 1 / 2 " 5 1 / 2 " 13 ' - 1 0 3 / 4 " 5 1 / 2 " 21 ' - 9 1 / 4 " 5 1 / 2 " 6' - 4 " 5 1 / 2 " 9 ' - 1 1 / 2 " 2 ' - 1 " 1 3 ' - 8 " 5 1 / 2 " 1 0 ' - 1 0 " 12 ' - 8 1 / 4 " 5' - 1 0 " 6' - 1 1 / 2 " 1 6 ' - 1 / 2 " 4 ' - 9 1 / 4 " 3 1 / 2 " 5 ' - 0 " 3 1 / 2 " 2 ' - 7 " 3 ' - 7 3 / 4 " 3' - 9 " 6' - 1 1 1 / 2 " 3' - 6 3 / 4 " 1 ' - 1 0 " 3 ' - 5 1 / 2 " 4 ' - 6 3 / 4 " F P TV F P M A S T E R B E D R O O M M A S T E R C L O S E T K I T C H E N LI V I N G R O O M D I N I N G D E C K D E C K PR O P O S E D S H E D D O R M E R AC I D E T C H E D G L A S S W A L L AN D B A R N D O O R D E N G L A S S W I N E C A B I N E T O P E N T O EN T R Y B E L O W O P E N TO B E L O W 18 R @ 7 . 5 " D O W N D O W N G L A S S R A I L D E C K R O O F E N T R Y R O O F B E L O W M A S T E R B A T H T. O . P L Y U P P E R L E V E L 11 1 ' - 0 " T. O . P L Y U P P E R L E V E L 1 1 0 ' - 0 " VO I D U N D E R LO W R O O F V O I D U N D E R L O W R O O F R O O F O V E R G A R A G E B E L O W R O O F O V E R H A N G @ G A R A G E B E L O W T. O . P L Y @ B A T H 1 0 9 ' - 6 " BE N C H S T E A M S H O W E R V O I D U N D E R L O W R O O F DR E S S E R VO I D U N D E R LO W R O O F 3 3 P 7 6 I I I . D . Scale: ISSUE H I S T O R I C   M O D E R N   D U P L E X 2 3 2 E A S T B L E E K E R A V E N U E A S P E N , C O /Volumes/PROJECTS MASTER - MINI/232 BLEEKER/ PLNS/232 BLEEKER 1.4.15.pln HPC 1" ACTUAL IF THE ABOVE DIMENSION DOES NOT MEASURE ONE INCH (1") EXACTLY, THIS DRAWING WILL HAVE BEEN ENLARGED OR REDUCED, AFFECTING ALL LABELED SCALES. ALL DESIGNS, IDEAS ARRANGEMENTS AND PLANS I N D I C AT E D B Y T H E S E D R A W I N G S A N D SPECIFICATIONS ARE THE PROPERTY AND COPYRIGHT OF KIM RAYMOND ARCHITECTS, INC. AND SHALL NEITHER BE USED ON ANY OTHER WORK NOR BE USED BY ANY OTHER PERSON FOR ANY USE WHATSOEVER WITHOUT WRITTEN PERMISSION. WRITTEN DIMENSIONS SHALL TAKE PRECEDENCE OVER SCALED DIMENSIONS AND SHALL BE VERIFIED AT THE SITE. ANY DIMENSIONAL DISCREPANCY SHALL BE BROUGHT TO THE ATTENTION OF THE ARCHITECT PRIOR TO COMMENCEMENT OF WORK. AS NOTED DATE 7/23/14 A 2.4 1/27/15 R O O F P L A N w w w . K i m R a y m o n d A r c h i t e c t s . c o m t e l   9 7 0 - ­ ‐ 9 2 5 - ­ ‐ 2 2 5 2     e m a i l   k i m @ k r a i . u s HPC FAR PARKING12/3/14 HPC MATERIALS1/6/15 HPC DORMERS1/27/15 A A B B 2 2 1 1 4 4 1. 7 1 . 7 A A C C 3' - 1 1 " 4 ' - 5 " P R O P O S E D 3 / 4 " / 1 2 " RO O F . P I T C H T O D R A I N E X I S T I N G 12 : 1 2 EX I S T I N G 1 2 : 1 2 E X I S T I N G 1 2 : 1 2 EX I S T I N G 1 2 : 1 2 EX I S T I N G 1 2 : 1 2 EX I S T I N G 1 2 : 1 2 EX I S T I N G 1 2 : 1 2 EX I S T I N G 1 2 : 1 2 P R O P O S E D S H E D D O R M E R 2 . 5 : 1 2 R E M O V E EX I S T I N G D O R M E R S EX I S T I N G P O R C H EX I S T I N G PO R C H P R O P O S E D 1 : 1 2 P R O P O S E D "F L A T " R O O F . P I T C H T O D R A I N E P D M R O O F W I T H M E T A L FA S C I A , T Y P . @ P R O P O S E D M O D E R N , FL A T R O O F S PR O P O S E D "F L A T " R O O F . PI T C H T O DR A I N PR O P O S E D S H E D D O R M E R 2 . 5 : 1 2 R E M O V E EX I S T I N G D O R M E R S 3 3 P 7 7 I I I . D . Scale: ISSUE H I S T O R I C   M O D E R N   D U P L E X 2 3 2 E A S T B L E E K E R A V E N U E A S P E N , C O /Volumes/PROJECTS MASTER - MINI/232 BLEEKER/ PLNS/232 BLEEKER 1.4.15.pln HPC 1" ACTUAL IF THE ABOVE DIMENSION DOES NOT MEASURE ONE INCH (1") EXACTLY, THIS DRAWING WILL HAVE BEEN ENLARGED OR REDUCED, AFFECTING ALL LABELED SCALES. ALL DESIGNS, IDEAS ARRANGEMENTS AND PLANS I N D I C AT E D B Y T H E S E D R A W I N G S A N D SPECIFICATIONS ARE THE PROPERTY AND COPYRIGHT OF KIM RAYMOND ARCHITECTS, INC. AND SHALL NEITHER BE USED ON ANY OTHER WORK NOR BE USED BY ANY OTHER PERSON FOR ANY USE WHATSOEVER WITHOUT WRITTEN PERMISSION. WRITTEN DIMENSIONS SHALL TAKE PRECEDENCE OVER SCALED DIMENSIONS AND SHALL BE VERIFIED AT THE SITE. ANY DIMENSIONAL DISCREPANCY SHALL BE BROUGHT TO THE ATTENTION OF THE ARCHITECT PRIOR TO COMMENCEMENT OF WORK. AS NOTED DATE 7/23/14 A 2.5 1/27/15 E X I S T I N G P L A N S w w w . K i m R a y m o n d A r c h i t e c t s . c o m t e l   9 7 0 - ­ ‐ 9 2 5 - ­ ‐ 2 2 5 2     e m a i l   k i m @ k r a i . u s HPC FAR PARKING12/3/14 HPC MATERIALS1/6/15 HPC DORMERS1/27/15 7898 7898 UP Living Room (9'-1" Ceiling) T.O. F.F. Main Level ELEV - 101'-0" M-100 Entry Porch M-112 Bedroom (8' Ceiling M-108 Dining Room M-101 Kitchen M-102 Pantry M-103 Mudroom M-104 Gas Stove Gas Oven & Range Cooktop K-3352UNDERTONESINKSSTAINLESS STEELRef Dish Laundry M-106 Storage/ Mech M-107 Access to Subgrade Mechanical Closet M-109 Closet M-110 Bathroom M-111 Stair M-105 Rear Porch M-113 MAIN Stair M-200 UPPER DN 17 T @ 8.5" (landings V.I.F.) 18 R @ 6 .75" = 10'-1.5" (V.I.F.) 17 T @ 8.5" (landings V.I.F.) 18 R @ 6 .75" = 10'-1.5" (V.I.F.) Hallway (6'-10" Ceiling) T.O. F.F. Upper Level ELEV - 111'-1 1/2" (V.I.F.) M-201 Bathroom M-202 Bedroom (11'-2" Ridge) T.O. F.F. Upper Bedroom ELEV - 110'-1 1/2" (V.I.F.) M-205 Bedroom (10'-2" Ridge) M-203 Closet M-204 Closet M-206 580.8 SQ FT EXISTING UPPER LEVEL DN ROOF Skylight Above Skylight Above Skylight Skylight EXISTING ROOF MATERIAL CEDAR SHINGLES: ALL AREAS 1371 SQ FT EXISTING ROOF SURFACE AREA RIDGE RIDGE RIDGE RIDGE RI D G E R I D G E RID G E VA L L E Y V A L L E Y VA L L E Y V A L L E Y VALLEY VA L L E Y V A L L E Y VA L L E Y V A L L E Y V A L L E Y P 7 8 I I I . D . Scale: ISSUE H I S T O R I C   M O D E R N   D U P L E X 2 3 2 E A S T B L E E K E R A V E N U E A S P E N , C O /Volumes/PROJECTS MASTER - MINI/232 BLEEKER/ PLNS/232 BLEEKER 1.4.15.pln HPC 1" ACTUAL IF THE ABOVE DIMENSION DOES NOT MEASURE ONE INCH (1") EXACTLY, THIS DRAWING WILL HAVE BEEN ENLARGED OR REDUCED, AFFECTING ALL LABELED SCALES. ALL DESIGNS, IDEAS ARRANGEMENTS AND PLANS I N D I C AT E D B Y T H E S E D R A W I N G S A N D SPECIFICATIONS ARE THE PROPERTY AND COPYRIGHT OF KIM RAYMOND ARCHITECTS, INC. AND SHALL NEITHER BE USED ON ANY OTHER WORK NOR BE USED BY ANY OTHER PERSON FOR ANY USE WHATSOEVER WITHOUT WRITTEN PERMISSION. WRITTEN DIMENSIONS SHALL TAKE PRECEDENCE OVER SCALED DIMENSIONS AND SHALL BE VERIFIED AT THE SITE. ANY DIMENSIONAL DISCREPANCY SHALL BE BROUGHT TO THE ATTENTION OF THE ARCHITECT PRIOR TO COMMENCEMENT OF WORK. AS NOTED DATE 7/23/14 A 4.1 1/27/15 E L E V A T I O N S - W E S T A N D N O R T H w w w . K i m R a y m o n d A r c h i t e c t s . c o m t e l   9 7 0 - ­ ‐ 9 2 5 - ­ ‐ 2 2 5 2     e m a i l   k i m @ k r a i . u s HPC FAR PARKING12/3/14 HPC MATERIALS1/6/15 HPC DORMERS1/27/15 C B AA 2 4 ' - 9 3 / 4 " 2 4 ' - 1 1 3 / 4 " FROSTED GLASS AND METAL GARAGE DOORS CERAMIC TILE PANELS BUTT-JOINTED WOOD HORIZONTAL SIDING 1 1.7 2 3 4 24 ' - 1 1 3 / 4 " REPAIR OR REPLACE EXISTING COLUMNS TO MATCH HISTORIC REMOVE EXISTING REPLICA "GINGERBREAD" TRIM REPAIR OR REPLACE EXISTING WOOD SIDING TO MATCH HISTORIC CONFIRM EXTENSION TO EXISTING HISTORIC CHIMNEY RESEARCH AND REPLACE THE METAL CHIMNEY POT SHOWN IN HISTORIC PHOTOS (NOT SHOWN HERE DUE TO LACK OF INFORMATION) CERAMIC TILE PANELSCERAMIC TILE PANELS BUTT-JOINTED WHITE HORIZONTAL WOOD SIDING EXISTING CORNERBOARDS TO REMAIN VISIBLE RECESS LINK BEHIND EXISTING HISTORIC CORNER SCALE: 1/4" = 1'-0" NORTH ELEVATION SCALE: 1/4" = 1'-0" WEST ELEVATION P 7 9 I I I . D . Scale: ISSUE H I S T O R I C   M O D E R N   D U P L E X 2 3 2 E A S T B L E E K E R A V E N U E A S P E N , C O /Volumes/PROJECTS MASTER - MINI/232 BLEEKER/ PLNS/232 BLEEKER 1.4.15.pln HPC 1" ACTUAL IF THE ABOVE DIMENSION DOES NOT MEASURE ONE INCH (1") EXACTLY, THIS DRAWING WILL HAVE BEEN ENLARGED OR REDUCED, AFFECTING ALL LABELED SCALES. ALL DESIGNS, IDEAS ARRANGEMENTS AND PLANS I N D I C AT E D B Y T H E S E D R A W I N G S A N D SPECIFICATIONS ARE THE PROPERTY AND COPYRIGHT OF KIM RAYMOND ARCHITECTS, INC. AND SHALL NEITHER BE USED ON ANY OTHER WORK NOR BE USED BY ANY OTHER PERSON FOR ANY USE WHATSOEVER WITHOUT WRITTEN PERMISSION. WRITTEN DIMENSIONS SHALL TAKE PRECEDENCE OVER SCALED DIMENSIONS AND SHALL BE VERIFIED AT THE SITE. ANY DIMENSIONAL DISCREPANCY SHALL BE BROUGHT TO THE ATTENTION OF THE ARCHITECT PRIOR TO COMMENCEMENT OF WORK. AS NOTED DATE 7/23/14 A 4.2 1/27/15 E L E V A T I O N S - E A S T A N D S O U T H w w w . K i m R a y m o n d A r c h i t e c t s . c o m t e l   9 7 0 - ­ ‐ 9 2 5 - ­ ‐ 2 2 5 2     e m a i l   k i m @ k r a i . u s HPC FAR PARKING12/3/14 HPC MATERIALS1/6/15 HPC DORMERS1/27/15 4 1 2 " 2 3 ' - 7 3 / 4 " 2 ' - 0 " ASSURE EXISTING HISTORIC CHIMNEY IS CODE COMPLIANT EXISTING HISTORIC CORNERBOARDS TO REMAIN VISIBLE FLOATING LOUVER SCREEN OVER BUTT-JOINTED WHITE WOOD HORIZONTAL SIDING CERAMIC TILE PANELS CERAMIC TILE PANELS 1/3 DISTANCE FROM EAVE TO RIDGE LINE EXISTING HISTORIC DORMERS TO REMAIN A B CA RETAIN AND REFINISH EXISTING HISTORIC DOORS EXISTING ANGLED HISTORIC WINDOW HEAD TO REMAIN CERAMIC TILE PANELS FLOATING LOUVERS BEYOND METAL LOUVERS OVER BUTT- JOINTED WOOD HORIZONTAL SIDING SCALE: 1/4" = 1'-0" EAST ELEVATION SCALE: 1/4" = 1'-0" SOUTH ELEVATION P 8 0 I I I . D . Scale: ISSUE H I S T O R I C   M O D E R N   D U P L E X 2 3 2 E A S T B L E E K E R A V E N U E A S P E N , C O /Volumes/PROJECTS MASTER - MINI/232 BLEEKER/ PLNS/232 BLEEKER 1.4.15.pln HPC 1" ACTUAL IF THE ABOVE DIMENSION DOES NOT MEASURE ONE INCH (1") EXACTLY, THIS DRAWING WILL HAVE BEEN ENLARGED OR REDUCED, AFFECTING ALL LABELED SCALES. ALL DESIGNS, IDEAS ARRANGEMENTS AND PLANS I N D I C AT E D B Y T H E S E D R A W I N G S A N D SPECIFICATIONS ARE THE PROPERTY AND COPYRIGHT OF KIM RAYMOND ARCHITECTS, INC. AND SHALL NEITHER BE USED ON ANY OTHER WORK NOR BE USED BY ANY OTHER PERSON FOR ANY USE WHATSOEVER WITHOUT WRITTEN PERMISSION. WRITTEN DIMENSIONS SHALL TAKE PRECEDENCE OVER SCALED DIMENSIONS AND SHALL BE VERIFIED AT THE SITE. ANY DIMENSIONAL DISCREPANCY SHALL BE BROUGHT TO THE ATTENTION OF THE ARCHITECT PRIOR TO COMMENCEMENT OF WORK. AS NOTED DATE 7/23/14 A 4.3 1/27/15 E X I S T I N G E L E V A T I O N S w w w . K i m R a y m o n d A r c h i t e c t s . c o m t e l   9 7 0 - ­ ‐ 9 2 5 - ­ ‐ 2 2 5 2     e m a i l   k i m @ k r a i . u s HPC FAR PARKING12/3/14 HPC MATERIALS1/6/15 HPC DORMERS1/27/15 T.O. FF. Main Level ELEV - 100'-0" (V.I.F.) T.O. FF. Upper Level South ELEV - 110'-1 1/2" (V.I.F.)T.O. FF. Upper Level North ELEV - 109'-1 1/2" (V.I.F.) T.O. Ridge N-S 12/12 Gable ELEV - 121'- 3/4" (V.I.F.)T.O. Ridge W-E 12/12 Gable ELEV - 120'- 1 1/8" (V.I.F.) EAST (MONARCH) 12 12 2 ' - 1 1 " existing plans &elevations 232bleeker SOUTH (BLEEKER) T.O. FF. Main Level ELEV - 100'-0" (V.I.F.) T.O. FF. Upper Level South ELEV - 110'-1 1/2" (V.I.F.)T.O. FF. Upper Level North ELEV - 109'-1 1/2" (V.I.F.) T.O. Ridge N-S 12/12 Gable ELEV - 121'- 3/4" (V.I.F.)T.O. Ridge W-E 12/12 Gable ELEV - 120'- 1 1/8" (V.I.F.) 12 12 21 ' - 6 1 / 4 " T.O. FF. Main Level ELEV - 100'-0" (V.I.F.) T.O. FF. Upper Level South ELEV - 110'-1 1/2" (V.I.F.)T.O. FF. Upper Level North ELEV - 109'-1 1/2" (V.I.F.) T.O. Ridge N-S 12/12 Gable ELEV - 121'- 3/4" (V.I.F.)T.O. Ridge W-E 12/12 Gable ELEV - 120'- 1 1/8" (V.I.F.) WEST (NEIGHBOR) 12 12 3 12 T.O. FF. Main Level ELEV - 100'-0" (V.I.F.) T.O. FF. Upper Level South ELEV - 110'-1 1/2" (V.I.F.)T.O. FF. Upper Level North ELEV - 109'-1 1/2" (V.I.F.) T.O. Ridge N-S 12/12 Gable ELEV - 121'- 3/4" (V.I.F.)T.O. Ridge W-E 12/12 Gable ELEV - 120'- 1 1/8" (V.I.F.) NORTH (ALLEY) 12 12 P 8 1 I I I . D . M o d S t a i r M a t e r i a l s 2 3 2   E   B L E E K E R 2 / 2 / 1 5 P9 A S P E N ,   C O 9 7 0 - 9 2 5 - 2 2 5 2 H I S T O R I C   M O D E R N   D U P L E X LANDSCAPE FIXTURE AT MODERN UNIT WALL SCONCE FIXTURE AT MODERN UNIT P 8 2 I I I . D . M o d M a s t e r M a t e r i a l s 2 3 2   E   B L E E K E R 2 / 2 / 1 5 P10 A S P E N ,   C O 9 7 0 - 9 2 5 - 2 2 5 2 H I S T O R I C   M O D E R N   D U P L E X P 8 3 I I I . D . V i c P o r c h M a t e r i a l s 2 3 2   E   B L E E K E R 2 / 2 / 1 5 P11 A S P E N ,   C O 9 7 0 - 9 2 5 - 2 2 5 2 H I S T O R I C   M O D E R N   D U P L E X WALL SCONCE FIXTURE AT VICTORIAN ENTRY PORCH P 8 4 I I I . D . P85 III.D. P86 III.D. P87 III.D. HPC Review 2.11.2015 530 W. Hallam Page 1 of 14 CONCEPTUAL MAJOR DEVELOPMENT MEMORANDUM TO: Aspen Historic Preservation Commission FROM: Amy Simon, Historic Preservation Officer RE: 530 W. Hallam –Conceptual Major Development, On-Site Relocation, Historic Landmark Lot Split and Variances, CONTINUED PUBLIC HEARING DATE: February 11, 2015 ________________________________________________________________________ SUMMARY: 530 W. Hallam is a Victorian era home with 1970s and 1980s additions to the east and rear. The applicant proposes to demolish the non-historic additions to the house and move it towards the front and west. The lot is to be subdivided so that the open yard on the east side of the Victorian can be developed with a new home. A floor area bonus, setback variances, and Residential Design Standards variances are requested. HPC discussed this project on January 28 th and continued it for restudy. In particular, the architect was asked to look at the front façade of the proposed new house and a staircase element on the Victorian. The garage on the proposed new home was to be redesigned to meet the rear setback requirement. Staff and the applicant were asked to get clarification from the Parks Department as to which of the large conifers in front of this house could possibly be removed. Attached are drawings which staff finds address all of the HPC’s direction. Staff recommends approval with conditions outlined in the attached Resolution. APPLICANT: 530 Hallam, LLC, represented by Kim Raymond Architects. PARCEL ID: 2735-124-25-004. ADDRESS: 530 W. Hallam, Lots K, L, and M, Block 28, City and Townsite of Aspen, Colorado. ZONING: R-6. The procedure for a Major Development Review, at the Conceptual level, is as follows. Staff reviews the submittal materials and prepares a report that analyzes P88 IV.A. HPC Review 2.11.2015 530 W. Hallam Page 2 of 14 the project’s conformance with the design guidelines and other applicable Land Use Code Sections. This report is transmitted to the HPC with relevant information on the proposed project and a recommendation to continue, approve, disapprove or approve with conditions and the reasons for the recommendation. The HPC will review the application, the staff analysis report and the evidence presented at the hearing to determine the project’s conformance with the City of Aspen Historic Preservation Design Guidelines. The HPC may approve, disapprove, approve with conditions, or continue the application to obtain additional information necessary to make a decision to approve or deny. Major Development is a two-step process requiring approval by the HPC of a Conceptual Development Plan, and then a Final Development Plan. Approval of a Conceptual Development Plan shall be binding upon HPC in regards to the location and form of the envelope of the structure(s) and/or addition(s) as depicted in the Conceptual Plan application including its height, scale, massing and proportions. No changes will be made to this aspect of the proposed development by the HPC as part of their review of the Final Development Plan unless agreed to by the applicant. Staff Response: Conceptual review focuses on the height, scale, massing and proportions of a proposal. A list of the relevant HPC design guidelines is attached as “Exhibit A.” The property being reviewed by HPC is Lots K, L, and M, seen on the 1904 Sanborne map at right. The home that was located on Lot M was demolished at an unknown date. The Victorian has been expanded in two directions; towards the alley and towards the east. The photo at left shows the original design, though in a deteriorated condition, in about the 1950s. A photo on the next page shows the home in 1980, followed by a current photo, illustrating how the house has become significantly hidden from view by large trees. P89 IV.A. HPC Review 2.11.2015 530 W. Hallam Page 3 of 14 P90 IV.A. HPC Review 2.11.2015 530 W. Hallam Page 4 of 14 Staff finds that the proposed project represents a successful preservation approach for this Victorian. Historic landmark lot splits have proven to be an effective way to reduce the size of additions to historic resources by transferring most of the square footage into a detached new building. The applicant is proposing significant restoration of the Victorian. Removing the two additions is in itself is very important to re-establishing the original form of the building, which has become very muddled. In terms of the addition to the Victorian, staff finds that all of the design guidelines are met. The addition is distanced from the back of the Victorian with a one story connector. Overall, the form of the addition is simple and related to the historic house. The proposed new house must draw references from the Victorian, but not copy it. The architect has re-worked the design so that the front part of the new house is a single story living space with gable roof forms and proportions that are similar to the architecture of the Victorian period, but distinguished with a flat roofed entry, and modern detailing. The proposed building is simple and pushed well back on the site because of the legacy tree that must be preserved. In terms of site plan, staff finds that the proposal is appropriate. The Victorian is on a slightly smaller lot than the new house, with less floor area assigned to it, which is the goal of the lot split. Setback requirements are met except for minor exceptions, addressed below. The required parking is provided on the site. The City Forester has performed additional assessment of the trees bordering the site and will recommend two be removed; one on each frontage, as indicated to the right. These trees, which are on City right- of-way, are overcrowded and show signs of illness and stress. These tree removals will dramatically improve the public visibility of this historic house. P91 IV.A. HPC Review 2.11.2015 530 W. Hallam Page 5 of 14 FLOOR AREA BONUS SETBACK VARIANCES In selected circumstances, the HPC may grant up to five hundred (500) additional square feet of allowable floor area for projects involving designated historic properties. To be considered for the bonus, it must be demonstrated that: a. The design of the project meets all applicable design guidelines; b. The historic building is the key element of the property and the addition is incorporated in a manner that maintains the visual integrity of the historic building; c. The work restores the existing portion of the building to its historic appearance; d. The new construction is reflective of the proportional patterns found in the historic building's form, materials or openings; e. The construction materials are of the highest quality; f. An appropriate transition defines the old and new portions of the building; g. The project retains a historic outbuilding; and/or h. Notable historic site and landscape features are retained. Staff Response: Staff finds that this project is appropriate for a floor area bonus because of the benefits of the lot split. All original features of the house will be preserved. In addition, the applicant will re-roof the Victorian with wood shingles, reconstruct the chimney to the original design, re-use the existing foundation stones as a veneer and ensure the new stone foundation matches the height and character of the existing, reconstruct a missing original double hung window on the ground floor of the south façade, and match the porch trim to what can be seen in the photo. In granting a variance, the HPC must make a finding that such a variance: a. Is similar to the pattern, features and character of the historic property or district; and/or b. Enhances or mitigates an adverse impact to the historic significance or architectural character of the historic property, an adjoining designated historic property or historic district. Staff Response: The project meets all setback variances, except that the basement level of both houses requires a 10’ setback, not a 5’ setback as drawn for the Victorian, and a 0’ setback as drawn for the new house. This has no effect that is seen by the public. The new house is 1’ shy of the required combined sideyard setback requirement, providing 10’ instead of 11.’ P92 IV.A. HPC Review 2.11.2015 530 W. Hallam Page 6 of 14 ON-SITE RELOCATION Staff supports the variances as a preservation incentive. 26.415.090.C. Standards for the relocation of designated properties. Relocation for a building, structure or object will be approved if it is determined that it meets any one of the following standards: 1. It is considered a noncontributing element of a historic district and its relocation will not affect the character of the historic district; or 2. It does not contribute to the overall character of the historic district or parcel on which it is located and its relocation will not have an adverse impact on the Historic District or property; or 3. The owner has obtained a certificate of economic hardship; or 4. The relocation activity is demonstrated to be an acceptable preservation method given the character and integrity of the building, structure or object and its move will not adversely affect the integrity of the Historic District in which it was originally located or diminish the historic, architectural or aesthetic relationships of adjacent designated properties; and Additionally, for approval to relocate all of the following criteria must be met: 1. It has been determined that the building, structure or object is capable of withstanding the physical impacts of relocation; 2. An appropriate receiving site has been identified; and 3. An acceptable plan has been submitted providing for the safe relocation, repair and preservation of the building, structure or object including the provision of the necessary financial security. Staff Response: Staff finds that the forward and westward relocation of the house meets Criterion 4 above, in that the move helps to distance the historic resource from the new construction. The move is not insignificant as the house will be placed 15’ in front of the location and just over 5’ west. The only other historic resource on this blockface is at the opposite end of the block. It is a miner’s cottage that has not been moved and is about 10’ back from the front lot line. As part of a building permit review, the applicant will be required to submit the standard assurances that relocation will proceed with care. P93 IV.A. HPC Review 2.11.2015 530 W. Hallam Page 7 of 14 HISTORIC LANDMARK LOT SPLIT The split of a lot that is a designated Historic Landmark for the purpose of creating one additional development parcel shall be approved, approved with conditions, or denied by the City Council, pursuant to Section 26.480.030 – Procedures for Review, after a recommendation is provided by the Historic Preservation Commission pursuant to Section 26.415.110(A) Historic Landmark Lot Split, and according to the following standards: 1. The request complies with the requirements of Section 26.480.040, General Subdivision Review Standards. A. Guaranteed Access to a Public Way. All subdivided lots must have perpetual unobstructed legal vehicular access to a public way. A proposed subdivision shall not eliminate or obstruct legal vehicular access from a public way to an adjacent property. All streets in a Subdivision retained under private ownership shall be dedicated to public use to ensure adequate public and emergency access. Security/privacy gates across access points and driveways are prohibited. B. Alignment with Original Townsite Plat . The proposed lot lines shall approximate, to the extent practical, the platting of the Original Aspen Townsite, and additions thereto, as applicable to the subject land. Minor deviations from the original platting lines to accommodate significant features of the site may be approved. C. Zoning Conformance. All new lots shall conform to the requirements of the zone district in which the property is situated, including variations and variances approved pursuant to this Title. A single lot shall not be located in more than one zone district unless unique circumstances dictate. A rezoning application may be considered concurrently with subdivision review. D. Existing Structures, Uses, and Non-Conformities . A subdivision shall not create or increase the non-conformity of a use, structure or parcel. A rezoning application or other mechanism to correct the non-conforming nature of a use, structure, or parcel may be considered concurrently. In the case where an existing structure or use occupies a site eligible for subdivision, the structure need not be demolished and the use need not be discontinued prior to application for subdivision. If approval of a subdivision creates a non-conforming structure or use, including a structure spanning a parcel boundary, such structure or use may continue until recordation of the subdivision plat. Alternatively, the City may accept certain assurance that the non-conformities will be remedied after recordation of the subdivision plat. Such assurances shall be reflected in a development agreement P94 IV.A. HPC Review 2.11.2015 530 W. Hallam Page 8 of 14 or other legal mechanism acceptable to the City Attorney and may be time-bound or secured with a financial surety. Staff Response: The application, to split the lot into one 4,200 square foot lot, containing a relocated Victorian home, and one 4,800 square foot lot, containing a new home, meets the criteria above. 2. The fathering parcel is listed in the Inventory of Historic Sites and Structures. Staff Response: The parcel is listed on the Inventory of Historic Sites and Structures. 3. No more than two lots are created by the Historic Landmark Lot Split. No more than one historic landmark lot split shall occur on any one fathering parcel. Staff Response: Two lots are created. 4. In residential zone districts, the allowable Floor Area for each new residential lot shall be established by allocating the total allowable Floor Area of the fathering parcel to each of the new lots such that no overall increase in Floor Area is achieved and no individual lot allows a Floor Area in excess of that allowed a similarly-sized lot in the same zone district. An equal distribution is not required. The allowable Floor Area for each new lot shall be noted on the Historic Lot Split Plat. Any Floor Area bonus already granted by the Historic Preservation Commission shall be allocated to each individual parcel and shall also be noted on the plat as a square footage bonus. If the properties remain eligible for a Floor Area bonus from the Historic Preservation Commission, the plat and subdivision agreement shall specify the manner in which this potential bonus shall be allocated to the two properties if received. In non-residential zones districts, the Floor Area shall be calculated according to the limitations of the zone district applied to each new lot as permitted for the use. The total Floor Area shall not be stated on the plat because the floor area will be determined by the use established on each parcel. Staff Response: The allowable floor area on the fathering (existing) parcel is 4,080 square feet. The applicant proposes to split that, plus a requested 500 square foot floor area bonus, between the Victorian home (2,138 square feet of floor area) and the new home (2,434 square feet of floor area). 5. The Historic Lot Split Plat shall be reviewed and recorded in the office of the Pitkin County Clerk and Recorder, pursuant to Chapter 26.490 – Approval Documents. No subdivision agreement need be prepared or entered into between the applicant and the City unless the Community Development Director determines such an agreement is necessary. Staff Response: The plat will be filed subsequent to historic landmark lot split approval by City Council. P95 IV.A. HPC Review 2.11.2015 530 W. Hallam Page 9 of 14 RESIDENTIAL DESIGN STANDARDS The project does not comply with the Secondary Mass design standard on the new home. The link between the primary and secondary mass is wider than the 10’ that is allowed. The existing single-family home (the Victorian) is exempt since it is not new. The standard says: Secondary mass. All new single-family and duplex structures shall locate at least ten percent (10%) of their total square footage above grade in a mass which is completely detached from the principal building or linked to it by a subordinate linking element. This standard shall only apply to parcels within the Aspen infill area pursuant to Subsection 26.410.010.B.2. Accessory buildings such as garages, sheds and accessory dwelling units are examples of appropriate uses for the secondary mass. A subordinate linking element for the purposes of linking a primary and secondary mass shall be at least ten (10) feet in length, not more than ten (10) feet in width, and with a plate height of not more than nine (9) feet. Accessible outdoor space over the linking element (e.g. a deck) is permitted but may not be covered or enclosed. Any railing for an accessible outdoor space over a linking element must be the minimum reasonably necessary to provide adequate safety and building code compliance and the railing must be 50% or more transparent. The project does not comply with the Building Element standard on the Victorian, which says: A covered entry porch of fifty (50) or more square feet, with a minimum depth of six (6') feet, shall be part of the front facade. Entry porches and canopies shall not be more than one (1) story in height. The project does not meet the Build-to-line standard, which requires 60% of the front façade of both buildings to be within 5’ of the front setback line and 60% of the Victorian to be within 5’ of the setback line along 5 th Street. In order to grant variances, HPC must find that the proposal will: a) Provide an appropriate design or pattern of development considering the context in which the development is proposed and purpose of the particular standard. In evaluating the context as it is used in the criteria, the reviewing board may consider the relationship of the proposed development with adjacent structures, P96 IV.A. HPC Review 2.11.2015 530 W. Hallam Page 10 of 14 the immediate neighborhood setting, or a broader vicinity as the board feels is necessary to determine if the exception is warranted; or, b) Be clearly necessary for reasons of fairness related to unusual site-specific constraints. Staff Response: Staff recommends the variances be granted. Secondary Mass Staff accepts the applicant’s argument that the lot with the new home is constrained by the large tree at the front of the site. The project needs to push back to avoid damaging the tree, therefore providing a detached Secondary Mass, or a narrow linking element, is less feasible than in other circumstances. Building Elements The feature that does not comply, the front porch on the Victorian, is a historic feature that should not be altered from the original design. Build-to line The Victorian has an irregular footprint at the front and cannot be redesigned to meet this standard. The new home cannot be moved further forward on the site because of trees. The project as represented also requires a variance related to the glazing shown on the front of the new house. Window design is reviewed at Final and will be addressed at that time. =============================================================== STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends HPC grant Conceptual Major Development, On-Site Relocation, Historic Landmark Lot Split and Variances with the following conditions: 1. HPC hereby grants a 500 square foot floor area bonus. 2. HPC hereby allows a 5’ rear setback at the basement level living space on the west lot, and a 0’ rear yard setback at the basement level on the east lot, instead of the required 10.’ HPC hereby allows a 10’ combined sideyard on the east lot instead of the required 11.’ 3. HPC hereby grants a waiver from the Residential Design Standards related to Secondary Mass, Building Elements and Build-to line. 4. For the temporary relocation of the Victorian house during basement excavation, the owner must provide a $30,000 letter of credit, cashier’s check, or other form acceptable to the City Attorney to insure the safe relocation of the house. A relocation plan detailing how and where the building will be stored and protected during construction must be submitted with the building permit application, and the applicant shall include documentation of the existing elevation of the home and the relationship of the foundation to grade in the building permit application. 5. A development application for a Final Development Plan shall be submitted within one (1) year of February 11, 2015, the date of approval of a Conceptual Development Plan. Failure to file such an application within this time period shall render null and P97 IV.A. HPC Review 2.11.2015 530 W. Hallam Page 11 of 14 void the approval of the Conceptual Development Plan. The Historic Preservation Commission may, at its sole discretion and for good cause shown, grant a one-time extension of the expiration date for a Conceptual Development Plan approval for up to six (6) months provided a written request for extension is received no less than thirty (30) days prior to the expiration date. EXHIBITS : Resolution #__, Series of 2015 Exhibit A: Design Guidelines Exhibit B: Application Exhibit A: Relevant HPC Design Guidelines for 530 W. Hallam, Conceptual review For the Victorian 9.1 Proposals to relocate a building will be considered on a case-by-case basis. In general, relocation has less of an impact on individual landmark structures than those in a historic district. It must be demonstrated that relocation is the best preservation alternative. Rehabilitation of a historic building must occur as a first phase of any improvements. A relocated building must be carefully rehabilitated to retain original architectural details and materials. Before a building is moved, a plan must be in place to secure the structure and provide a new foundation, utilities, and to restore the house. The design of a new structure on the site should be in accordance with the guidelines for new construction. In general, moving a building to an entirely different site or neighborhood is not approved. 9.4 Site the structure in a position similar to its historic orientation. It should face the same direction and have a relatively similar setback. It may not, for example, be moved to the rear of the parcel to accommodate a new building in front of it. 9.6 When rebuilding a foundation, locate the structure at its approximate historic elevation above grade. Raising the building slightly above its original elevation is acceptable. However, lifting it substantially above the ground level is inappropriate. Changing the historic elevation is discouraged, unless it can be demonstrated that it enhances the resource. 9.7 A lightwell may be used to permit light into below-grade living space. P98 IV.A. HPC Review 2.11.2015 530 W. Hallam Page 12 of 14 In general, a lightwell is prohibited on a wall that faces a street (per the Residential Design Standards). The size of a lightwell should be minimized. A lightwell that is used as a walkout space may be used only in limited situations and will be considered on a case-by-case basis. If a walkout space is feasible, it should be surrounded by a simple fence or rail. 10.2 A more recent addition that is not historically significant may be removed. 10.3 Design a new addition such that one's ability to interpret the historic character of the primary building is maintained. A new addition that creates an appearance inconsistent with the historic character of the primary building is inappropriate. An addition that seeks to imply an earlier period than that of the primary building also is inappropriate. An addition that seeks to imply an inaccurate variation of the primary building's historic style should be avoided. An addition that covers historically significant features is inappropriate. 10.4 Design a new addition to be recognized as a product of its own time. An addition should be made distinguishable from the historic building, while also remaining visually compatible with these earlier features. A change in setbacks of the addition from the historic building, a subtle change in material or a differentiation between historic, and more current styles are all techniques that may be considered to help define a change from old to new construction. 10.6 Design an addition to be compatible in size and scale with the main building. An addition that is lower than or similar to the height of the primary building is preferred. 10.7 If it is necessary to design an addition that is taller than a historic building, set it back substantially from significant facades and use a "connector" to link it to the historic building. A 1-story connector is preferred. The connector should be a minimum of 10 feet long between the addition and the primary building. The connector also should be proportional to the primary building. 10.8 Place an addition at the rear of a building or set it back from the front to minimize the visual impact on the historic structure and to allow the original proportions and character to remain prominent. Locating an addition at the front of a structure is inappropriate. Additional floor area may also be located under the building in a basement which will not alter the exterior mass of a building. P99 IV.A. HPC Review 2.11.2015 530 W. Hallam Page 13 of 14 Set back an addition from primary facades in order to allow the original proportions and character to remain prominent. A minimum setback of 10 feet on primary structures is recommended. 10.9 Roof forms should be similar to those of the historic building. Typically, gable, hip and shed roofs are appropriate. Flat roofs are generally inappropriate for additions on residential structures with sloped roofs. 10.10 Design an addition to a historic structure such that it will not destroy or obscure historically important architectural features. For example, loss or alteration of architectural details, cornices and eavelines should be avoided. For the New House: Building Orientation 11.1 Orient the primary entrance of a new building to the street. The building should be arranged parallel to the lot lines, maintaining the traditional grid pattern of the site. 11.2 In a residential context, clearly define the primary entrance to a new building by using a front porch. The front porch should be "functional," in that it is used as a means of access to the entry. A new porch should be similar in size and shape to those seen traditionally. In some cases, the front door itself may be positioned perpendicular to the street; nonetheless, the entry should still be clearly defined with a walkway and porch that orients to the street. 11.3 Construct a new building to appear similar in scale with the historic buildings on the parcel. Subdivide larger masses into smaller "modules" that are similar in size to the historic buildings on the original site. 11.4 Design a front elevation to be similar in scale to the historic building. The primary plane of the front should not appear taller than the historic structure. The front should include a one-story element, such as a porch. 11.5 Use building forms that are similar to those of the historic property. They should not overwhelm the original in scale. 11.6 Use roof forms that are similar to those seen traditionally in the block. Sloping roofs such as gable and hip roofs are appropriate for primary roof forms. P100 IV.A. HPC Review 2.11.2015 530 W. Hallam Page 14 of 14 Flat roofs should be used only in areas where it is appropriate to the context. On a residential structure, eave depths should be similar to those seen traditionally in the context. Exotic building and roof forms that would detract from the visual continuity of the street are discouraged. These include geodesic domes and A-frames. 11.10 The imitation of older historic styles is discouraged. This blurs the distinction between old and new buildings. Highly complex and ornately detailed revival styles that were not a part of Aspen's history are especially discouraged on historic sites. P101 IV.A. HPC Resolution #__, Series of 2015 Page 1 of 2 A RESOLUTION OF THE ASPEN HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION (HPC) GRANTING CONCEPTUAL MAJOR DEVELOPMENT, ON-SITE RELOCATION, AND VARIANCE APPROVAL, AND RECOMMENDING HISTORIC LANDMARK LOT SPLIT APPROVAL FOR THE PROPERTY LOCATED AT 530 W. HALLAM, LOTS K, L, AND M, BLOCK 28, CITY AND TOWNSITE OF ASPEN, COLORADO RESOLUTION # __ , SERIES OF 2015 PARCEL ID: 2735-124-25-004 WHEREAS, the applicant, 530 Hallam, LLC, represented by Kim Raymond Architects, has requested HPC approval for Conceptual Major Development, On-Site Relocation, Variances and a Historic Landmark Lot Split for the property located at 530 W. Hallam, Lots K, L, and M, Block 28, City and Townsite of Aspen, Colorado; and WHEREAS, Section 26.415.070 of the Municipal Code states that “no building or structure shall be erected, constructed, enlarged, altered, repaired, relocated or improved involving a designated historic property or district until plans or sufficient information have been submitted to the Community Development Director and approved in accordance with the procedures established for their review;” and WHEREAS, for Conceptual Major Development Review, the HPC must review the application, a staff analysis report and the evidence presented at a hearing to determine the project’s conformance with the City of Aspen Historic Preservation Design Guidelines per Section 26.415.070.D.3.b.2 and 3 of the Municipal Code and other applicable Code Sections. The HPC may approve, disapprove, approve with conditions or continue the application to obtain additional information necessary to make a decision to approve or deny; and WHEREAS, in order to receive approval for Relocation, the application shall meet the requirements of Aspen Municipal Code Section 26.415.090.C, Relocation of a Designated Property; and WHEREAS, in order to receive approval for a floor area bonus, the application shall meet the requirements of Aspen Municipal Code Section 26.415.110.F; and WHEREAS, the HPC may approve setback variances according to Section 26.415.110.C.1.a, Variances; and WHEREAS, the HPC may approve variances to the Residential Design Standards according to Section 26.410.020.D; and WHEREAS, in order to complete a Historic Landmark Lot Split, the application shall meet the requirements of Aspen Municipal Code Section 26.480.030. HPC makes a recommendation to City Council; and P102 IV.A. HPC Resolution #__, Series of 2015 Page 2 of 2 WHEREAS, HPC reviewed the project on January 28, 2015 and February 11, 2015. HPC considered the application, the staff memo and public comments, and found the proposal consistent with the review standards and granted approval with conditions by a vote of __to __. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED: That HPC hereby grants Conceptual Major Development, On-Site Relocation, and Variance approval, and recommends City Council approve a Historic Landmark Lot Split, for the property located at 530 W. Hallam, Lots K, L, and M, Block 28, City and Townsite of Aspen, Colorado with the following conditions: 1. HPC hereby grants a 500 square foot floor area bonus. 2. HPC hereby allows a 5’ rear setback at the basement level living space on the west lot, and a 0’ rear yard setback at the basement level on the east lot, instead of the required 10.’ HPC hereby allows a 10’ combined sideyard on the east lot instead of the required 11.’ 3. HPC hereby grants a waiver from the Residential Design Standards related to Secondary Mass, Building Elements and Build-to line. 4. For the temporary relocation of the Victorian house during basement excavation, the owner must provide a $30,000 letter of credit, cashier’s check, or other form acceptable to the City Attorney to insure the safe relocation of the house. A relocation plan detailing how and where the building will be stored and protected during construction must be submitted with the building permit application, and the applicant shall include documentation of the existing elevation of the home and the relationship of the foundation to grade in the building permit application. 5. A development application for a Final Development Plan shall be submitted within one (1) year of February 11, 2015, the date of approval of a Conceptual Development Plan. Failure to file such an application within this time period shall render null and void the approval of the Conceptual Development Plan. The Historic Preservation Commission may, at its sole discretion and for good cause shown, grant a one-time extension of the expiration date for a Conceptual Development Plan approval for up to six (6) months provided a written request for extension is received no less than thirty (30) days prior to the expiration date. APPROVED BY THE COMMISSION at its regular meeting on the 11th day of February, 2015. Approved as to Form: Approved as to Content: ______________________________ _____________________________ Debbie Quinn, Assistant City Attorney Willis Pember, Chair ATTEST: ___________________________ Kathy Strickland, Chief Deputy Clerk P103 IV.A. 802 E. Cooper Avenue, Suite 4 | Aspen, Colorado | 81611 | 970.925.2252       February  2,  2015           Amy  Simon   City  of  Aspen  Community  Development  Department   130  S  Galena  Street,  3rd  Floor   Aspen,  CO    81611     RE:    530  W  Hallam  Ave    Summary  Letter,  Revised   Aspen,  Colorado   Parcel  ID:  273512425004     Dear  Amy,     Thank  you  for  your  knowledge  and  direction  regarding  this  property  and  the  process   required  to  renovate  the  historic  structure  and  to  do  the  lot  split  for  a  new  residence.     The  following  information  will  address  the  changes  made  to  both  the  Historic   home  and  the  proposed  new  home  since  the  Conceptual  Review  on  Jan.  28,  2015.     This  property  is  located  in  the  R-­‐6,  Medium  density,  residential  zone  district.         P104 IV.A. 802 E. Cooper Avenue, Suite 4 | Aspen, Colorado | 81611 | 970.925.2252   26.410.040  Residential  Design  Standards    A.  Site  design      After  meeting  with  the  City  Forester,  we  were  asked  to  move  the  Victorian  back   towards  the  East  by  at  least  a  foot  to  place  it  further  from  the  trees  along  Fifth  Street.   We  did  adjust  it,  so  it  is  now  being  moved  5’-­‐3”  to  the  West,  rather  than  6’-­‐5”.          This  affects  the  required  frontage  dimension  that  applies  to  the  West  side  of  this   building  because  it  is  on  a  corner  lot.    This  places  the  Victorian  6’-­‐0  from  the  setback   line  at  the  rear  of  the  original  building  and  9’-­‐3  3/4”    at  the  narrower,  front  portion.   The  linking  element  is  13’-­‐2  ½”  from  the  setback.    This  exposed  7’-­‐3”  of  the  rear   of  the  original  structure.    Thus  we  need  a  variance  from  this  design  standard;  so  we   can  save  the  trees.    This  puts  all  of  the  construction  a  minimum  of  5’  from  the  drip   line  of  these  trees.        The  proposed  home  on  the  newly  created  lot  to  the  east  will  be  set  back  30’-­‐0”   from  the  front  property  line,  starting  construction  at  the  line  of  the  existing  wall  of  the   front  addition  (that  we  are  removing)  to  ensure  the  safety  of  the  legacy  tree.      Pushing  the  new  home  back  this  far  on  the  lot,  requires  a  variance  from  the     design  standard  of  having  the  front  door  within  5’  of  the  front  setback  line.    The  benefit  of  this,  beyond  saving  the  large  tree,  is  that  it  sets  the  Historic   resource  18’-­‐0”  in  front  of  the  new  home;  making  the  Victorian  the  prominent   structure  on  the  property.        B.1.  Building  Form      The  Victorian  will  have  a  single  story  element  that  is  16’-­‐10”,  linking  it  to  the     new  addition  at  the  rear.    The  stair  element,  which  was  a  big  concern  to  both  staff  and   the  members  of  the  HPC;  has  been  moved  to  the  East  side  of  the  building  so  as  not  to  be   a  dominate  feature  on  the  west  or  street  facing  side  of  the  building.    The  single  story   element  continues  past  the  stair  element  to  the  north  so  the  two-­‐story  element  has  a   break  in  the  façade  facing  the  street.    The  windows  have  also  been  simplified  in  this  stair   element,  eliminating  all  windows  that  face  the  street,  in  response  to  a  comment  about   too  much  light  from  this  element  being  a  distraction  from  the  historic  resource.    The  roof  of  the  addition  has  been  simplified  further,  with  the  pure  gable  form   being  the  dominant  feature  of  this  element  of  the  building.    Small  areas  of  flat  roof  are   used  for  the  stair  element  and  over  the  rear  of  the  upper  level  to  be  subordinate  to     this  gable  form.    No  dormers  are  visible  from  Hallam  street  on  the  addition.      The  front  façade  of  the  new  home  has  been  redesigned  to  lower  the  gable  roof   over  the  living  room.    The  gable  form  has  been  emphasized  by  walls  that  frame  the   windows  on  this  façade  and  connect  to  the  roof  overhang,  making  the  gable  form  the   primary  element  of  this  home.    The  pitch  of  the  roof  is  the  same  as  the  Victorian  at   12/12;  but  the  spring  point  is  much  lower  on  new  home.         P105 IV.A. 802 E. Cooper Avenue, Suite 4 | Aspen, Colorado | 81611 | 970.925.2252  The  new  home  has  been  re-­‐designed  to  pull  the  garage  off  the  alley,  to  be   within  our  5”-­‐0  setback;  in  response  to  the  strong  feelings  of  the  neighbors  and  the  HPC.      The  secondary  mass  of  the  new  home  has  a  single  story  element  that  is  12’-­‐4”   from  the  gable  of  the  living  room.    The  roof  of  this  rear  element  is  also  a  very  simple     gable  with  small  areas  of  flat  roof  being  subordinate.          With  all  the  confinements  on  this  property  from  the  large  trees  and  the  legacy   that  will  be  saved,  we  are  asking  for  a  few  setback  and  design  guideline  variances.         D3.a  We  are  seeking  a  variance  from  the  “no  window  zone”  between  9’-­‐12’  in   the  new  home.    Since  the  gable  form  is  obviously  not  a  two  story  element  and  is  very   shielded  from  the  street  (and  the  sun)  from  the  legacy  tree,  we  are  trying  to  get  as  much   light  as  possible  into  the  building.      The  design  of  mostly  glass  in  this  element  gives  the     simple  gable  form  a  modern  twist  without  fighting  for  attention  with  the  Victorian.   The  new  home  is  also  30’  from  the  street,  being  less  dominate  structure  on  the  lot.       E2.  Inflection.      There  are  two  story  homes  on  both  sides  of  this  property,  though   the  one  to  the  West  is  across  the  street.    The  house  directly  adjacent  to  the  new  home  is   the  largest  on  the  block  with  most  of  it’s  two  story  mass  on  the  front  setback  line.    The   new  home  on  our  property  is  a  single  story  element  at  the  front,  with  the  gable  being   shorter  than  the  Victorian,  but  not  so  short  as  to  be  dwarfed  by  the  home  to  the  East.     Neighborhood  characteristics:    Photos  of  the  neighboring  houses  have  been  added  to  your  packet.    There  are   mostly  two  story  homes  on  the  block.    The  homes  to  the  immediate  east  and  west   are  both  two  story;  the  flat  roof  house,  two  doors  to  the  east  is  also  two  story.    The  alley  that  we  use  for  access,  has  two  story  buildings  along  it;  two  of  the   homes  directly  behind  our  lot  have  two  story  buildings.      Across  the  street,  there  are  two  story  homes  and  another  flat  roofed  home   and  a  small  miners  cottage.    We  feel  like  the  proposed  homes  on  our  lot  fit  very  well  in   this  diverse  neighborhood.       Thank  you  for  your  time  and  consideration  of  this  project.    We  look  forward  to  working   with  the  HPC  again.     Sincerely,         Kim  Raymond,  Principal   Kim  Raymond  Architects,  Inc   P106 IV.A. Scale: ISSUE A 9.1 2/3/15Plotted On:3 -D V I E W S ALL DESIGNS, IDEAS ARRANGEMENTS AND PLANS I N D I C AT E D B Y T H E S E D R AW I N G S A N D SPECI FICATIONS ARE THE P RO PERTY AND COPYRIGHT OF KIM RAYMOND ARCHITECTS, INC. AND SHALL NEITHER BE USED ON ANY OTHER WORK NOR BE USED BY ANY OTHER PERSON FOR ANY USE WHATSOEVER WITHOUT WRITTEN PERMISSION. WRITTEN DIMENSIONS SHALL TAKE PRECEDENCE OVER SCALED DIMENSIONS AND SHALL BE VERIFIED AT THE SITE. ANY DIMENSIONAL DISCREPANCY SHALL BE BROUGHT TO THE ATTENTION OF THE ARCHITECT PRIOR TO COMMENCEMENT OF WORK. IF THE ABOVE DIMENSION DOES NO T MEASURE ON E INCH (1 ") EXACTLY, THIS DRAWING WILL HAVE BEEN ENLARGED OR REDUCED, AFFECTING ALL LABELED SCALES. 1" ACTUAL AS NOTED DATE w w w . K i m R a y m o n d A r c h i t e c t s . c o m t e l 9 7 0 - 9 2 5 - 2 2 5 2 e m a i l k i m @ k r a i . u s 9/18/14 5 3 0 W H A L L A M V I C T O R I A N R E N O V A T I O N 5 3 0 W H A L L A M S T R E E T SCHEMATIC A S P E N , C O 1/26/15 HPC SUBMITTAL SCALE: 1:68.57 DOWN THE STREET SCALE: 1:66.67 ALLEY NE TREETOPS SCALE: 1:68.57 CORNER SIDEWALK SCALE: 1:47.53 CORNER TREETOP VIEW SCALE: 1:68.57 CORNER TREES DEMO SCALE: 1:73.85 MOD MIDDLE P 1 0 7 I V . A . Scale: ISSUE A 0.2 2/3/15Plotted On:S I T E P L A N - P R O P O S E D ALL DESIGNS, IDEAS ARRANGEMENTS AND PLANS I N D I C AT E D B Y T H E S E D R AW I N G S A N D SPECI FICATIONS ARE THE P RO PERTY AND COPYRIGHT OF KIM RAYMOND ARCHITECTS, INC. AND SHALL NEITHER BE USED ON ANY OTHER WORK NOR BE USED BY ANY OTHER PERSON FOR ANY USE WHATSOEVER WITHOUT WRITTEN PERMISSION. WRITTEN DIMENSIONS SHALL TAKE PRECEDENCE OVER SCALED DIMENSIONS AND SHALL BE VERIFIED AT THE SITE. ANY DIMENSIONAL DISCREPANCY SHALL BE BROUGHT TO THE ATTENTION OF THE ARCHITECT PRIOR TO COMMENCEMENT OF WORK. IF THE ABOVE DIMENSION DOES NO T MEASURE ON E INCH (1 ") EXACTLY, THIS DRAWING WILL HAVE BEEN ENLARGED OR REDUCED, AFFECTING ALL LABELED SCALES. 1" ACTUAL AS NOTED DATE w w w . K i m R a y m o n d A r c h i t e c t s . c o m t e l 9 7 0 - 9 2 5 - 2 2 5 2 e m a i l k i m @ k r a i . u s 9/18/14 5 3 0 W H A L L A M V I C T O R I A N R E N O V A T I O N 5 3 0 W H A L L A M S T R E E T SCHEMATIC A S P E N , C O 1/26/15 HPC SUBMITTAL B B 1 1 2 2 3 3 4 4 5 5 A A C C D D A A C C D D 8 8 7 7 9 9 A A C C D D 123456789 1 0 1 1 1 2 1 3 1 4 1 5 1 6 1 7 1 8 F D W 16 R. @ 7 1/2"15 T. @ 12" 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 910111213141516 5'-0"5'-0" 5'-0" 5 '-0 " 5'-0" 5'-1/2" 41'-6"48'-6" 2 2 '-1 0 " 16'-10 3/4"21'-1" 37'-11 3/4" 6'-1/4"3'-4 3/4" 13'-2 3/4"15'-3" 4'-5" 1 6 '-9 3 /4 " 7'-3" 1 8 '-2 " FRONT PORCH F R O N T W A L K F R O N T W A L K GARAGE APRON / DRIVEWAY GARAGE APRON / DRIVEWAY EXISTING TREE TO BE REMOVED PER CITY FORESTER EXISTING TREE TO REMAIN EXISTING TREE TO REMAIN EXISTING TREE TO REMAIN EXISTING TREE TO BE REMOVED EXISTING TREE TO REMAIN, IF POSSIBLE SETBACK LINE SETBACK LINE SETBACK LINE SETBACK LINE S E T B A C K L I N E S E T B A C K L I N E S E T B A C K L I N E S E T B A C K L I N E P R O P E R T Y L I N E P R O P E R T Y L I N E PROPERTY LINE PROPERTY LINE P R O P O S E D N E W P R O P E R T Y L I N E HALLAM STREET F I F T H S T R E E T ALLEY FRONT PORCH F R O N T W A L K F R O N T W A L K GARAGE APRON / DRIVEWAY GARAGE APRON / DRIVEWAY EXISTING TREE TO REMAIN EXISTING TREE TO REMAIN EXISTING "LEGACY" TREE TO REMAIN EXISTING TREE TO REMAIN EXISTING TREE TO BE REMOVED EXISTING TREE TO REMAIN, IF POSSIBLE SETBACK LINE SETBACK LINE SETBACK LINE SETBACK LINE S E T B A C K L I N E S E T B A C K L I N E S E T B A C K L I N E S E T B A C K L I N E P R O P E R T Y L I N E P R O P E R T Y L I N E PROPERTY LINE PROPERTY LINE P R O P O S E D N E W P R O P E R T Y L I N E HALLAM STREET F I F T H S T R E E T ALLEY LINE OF EXISTING FRONT OF HOUSE EXISTING TREE TO BE REMOVED PER CITY FORESTER 2 SITE PLAN 1/8" = 1'-0" LOT SIZE: 9,000 SF LOT SIZE: 9,000 SF P 1 0 8 I V . A . Scale: ISSUE A 1.3 2/3/15Plotted On:E X I S T I N G E L E V A T I O N S ALL DESIGNS, IDEAS ARRANGEMENTS AND PLANS I N D I C AT E D B Y T H E S E D R AW I N G S A N D SPECI FICATIONS ARE THE P RO PERTY AND COPYRIGHT OF KIM RAYMOND ARCHITECTS, INC. AND SHALL NEITHER BE USED ON ANY OTHER WORK NOR BE USED BY ANY OTHER PERSON FOR ANY USE WHATSOEVER WITHOUT WRITTEN PERMISSION. WRITTEN DIMENSIONS SHALL TAKE PRECEDENCE OVER SCALED DIMENSIONS AND SHALL BE VERIFIED AT THE SITE. ANY DIMENSIONAL DISCREPANCY SHALL BE BROUGHT TO THE ATTENTION OF THE ARCHITECT PRIOR TO COMMENCEMENT OF WORK. IF THE ABOVE DIMENSION DOES NO T MEASURE ON E INCH (1 ") EXACTLY, THIS DRAWING WILL HAVE BEEN ENLARGED OR REDUCED, AFFECTING ALL LABELED SCALES. 1" ACTUAL AS NOTED DATE w w w . K i m R a y m o n d A r c h i t e c t s . c o m t e l 9 7 0 - 9 2 5 - 2 2 5 2 e m a i l k i m @ k r a i . u s 9/18/14 5 3 0 W H A L L A M V I C T O R I A N R E N O V A T I O N 5 3 0 W H A L L A M S T R E E T SCHEMATIC A S P E N , C O 1/26/15 HPC SUBMITTAL A B EXISTING WOOD SIDING AND TRIM TO REMAIN EXISTING WINDOW TRIM TO REMAIN EXISTING FASCIA AND SOFFIT TO REMAIN EXISTING BRICK CHIMNEY TO REMAIN EXISTING WOOD FRONT DOOR, TRANSOM AND FRONT PORCH TRIM DETAILS TO REMAIN HISTORIC TO REMAIN ADDITION TO BE DEMOLISHED HISTORIC TO REMAIN ADDITION TO BE DEMOLISHED UPPER LEVEL PLY 109'-10" MAIN LEVEL PLY 100'-0" 1 2 3 '-8 1 /4 " EXISTING WOOD SIDING AND TRIM TO REMAIN EXISTING WINDOW TRIM TO REMAIN EXISTING FASCIA AND SOFFIT TO REMAIN HISTORIC TO REMAIN ADDITION TO BE DEMOLISHED B A EXISTING CMU CHIMNEY EXISTING UTILITIES TO BE RELOCATED MIDCENTURY ADDITION TO BE DEMOLISHED RECENT ADDITION TO BE DEMOLISHED 2 1 EXISTING SIDE PORCH TO BE REMOVED EXISTING WOOD SIDING AND TRIM TO REMAIN EXISTING WINDOW TRIM TO REMAIN EXISTING FASCIA AND SOFFIT TO REMAIN EXISTING GREEN METAL ROOF TO BE REPLACED WITH ZINC STANDING SEAM EXISTING BALCONY TO BE REMOVED EXISTING BULKHEAD / COAL CHUTE EXISTING UTILITIES TO BE RELOCATED HISTORIC TO REMAIN ADDITION TO BE DEMOLISHED SCALE: 1/8" = 1'-0" WEST EXISTING SCALE: 1/8" = 1'-0" EAST EXISTING P 1 0 9 I V . A . Scale: ISSUE V 2/3/15Plotted On:P R O P O S E D F L O O R P L A N S - V I C ALL DESIGNS, IDEAS ARRANGEMENTS AND PLANS I N D I C AT E D B Y T H E S E D R AW I N G S A N D SPECI FICATIONS ARE THE P RO PERTY AND COPYRIGHT OF KIM RAYMOND ARCHITECTS, INC. AND SHALL NEITHER BE USED ON ANY OTHER WORK NOR BE USED BY ANY OTHER PERSON FOR ANY USE WHATSOEVER WITHOUT WRITTEN PERMISSION. WRITTEN DIMENSIONS SHALL TAKE PRECEDENCE OVER SCALED DIMENSIONS AND SHALL BE VERIFIED AT THE SITE. ANY DIMENSIONAL DISCREPANCY SHALL BE BROUGHT TO THE ATTENTION OF THE ARCHITECT PRIOR TO COMMENCEMENT OF WORK. IF THE ABOVE DIMENSION DOES NO T MEASURE ON E INCH (1 ") EXACTLY, THIS DRAWING WILL HAVE BEEN ENLARGED OR REDUCED, AFFECTING ALL LABELED SCALES. 1" ACTUAL AS NOTED DATE w w w . K i m R a y m o n d A r c h i t e c t s . c o m t e l 9 7 0 - 9 2 5 - 2 2 5 2 e m a i l k i m @ k r a i . u s 9/18/14 5 3 0 W H A L L A M V I C T O R I A N R E N O V A T I O N 5 3 0 W H A L L A M S T R E E T SCHEMATIC A S P E N , C O 1/26/15 HPC SUBMITTAL C D C D 8 8 7 7 9 9 C D CD W 4 ' - 9 1 / 2 "4 '-9 1 /2 " 7'-2 1/2" 8'-1/4" 2 6 '-7 1 /4 " 5 1 '-8 1 /2 " 8 " 22'-0" 1 0 '-1 1 /4 " 5 '-6 " 5 '-8 " 3 1/2"13'-0"5 1/2"10'-1/2"3 1/2" 6 '-0 " 4"3'-4 3/4" 4 '-1 1 1 /4 " 3 1 /2 " 5 '-6 1 /4 " 5 1 /2 " 1 3 '-0 " 3 1 /2 " 4 '-6 " 1 4 '-7 " BEDROOM 3 BEDROOM 2 FAMILY ROOM W I N D O W W E L L W I N D O W W E L L CLOSET DRESSER LAUNDRY O P E N R I S E R S , S T E E L S T A I R S G L A S S R A I L I N G BEDROOM 4 F P a n d T V B A T H 4 C L E A R G L A S S A T S H O W E R FROSTED GLASS AT WC MECHANICAL W I N D O W W E L L F L O A T I N G B E N C H BATH 3 BATH 2 T.O. SLAB 89'-0" C D C D 8 8 7 7 9 9 C D F D W 16 R. @ 7 1/2"15 T. @ 12" 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 910111213141516 5'-1/2" 5 1/2"13'-0"5 1/2" 5 1/2"24'-5 3/4"5 1/2" 5 1 /2 " 1 5 '-7 " 5 1 /2 " 5'-3"2'-0"5 1/2"14'-9 1/2"2'-10 3/4" 4'-6" 2 2 '-1 0 " 6'-1/4"3'-4 3/4" 13'-2 3/4"15'-3" 4'-5" 1 6 '-9 3 /4 " 7'-3" FRONT PORCH F R O N T W A L K GARAGE APRON / DRIVEWAY SETBACK LINE SETBACK LINE S E T B A C K L I N E S E T B A C K L I N E FRONT PORCH F R O N T W A L K GARAGE APRON / DRIVEWAY SETBACK LINE SETBACK LINE S E T B A C K L I N E S E T B A C K L I N E UP DN MUD ROOM LIVING DINING FP TV ACID ETCHED GLASS OR PERFORATED STL ENTRY PORCH KITCHEN POWDER OPEN TO ABOVE REMOVE EXISTING FLOOR ADD STEEL AND WOOD TRUSSES IN VOLUME CUBBIES AND BENCH F R O S T E D G L A S S P A N E L LINE OF EXTERIOR WALL ABOVE L I N E O F E X T E R I O R W A L L A B O V E T.O. PLY 100'-0" T.O. SLAB 100'-0" GARAGE P A N T R Y PATIO C D C D 8 8 7 7 9 9 C D 16 R. @ 7 1/2"15 T. @ 12" 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 910111213141516 5 1/2"5'-0" 1 1 '-7 1 /4 " 3 '-3 1 /2 " 21'-6 1/2" DECK ROOF OVERHANG BELOW GAS FIREPLACE W/STEEL SURROUND MASTER SUITE F R O S T E D G L A S S E N C L O S U R E CLEAR GLASS ENCLOSURE TV STEAM SHOWER STONE VENEER ON WALL LOWER ENTRY ROOF FREE STANDING TUB T.O. PLY 110'-2" OPEN TO BELOW SCALE: 3/16" = 1'-0" LOWER LEVEL W/BEDROOM SCALE: 3/16" = 1'-0" MAIN LEVEL PLAN SCALE: 3/16" = 1'-0" UPPER LEVEL PLAN P 1 1 0 I V . A . Scale: ISSUE AV 3.10 2/3/15Plotted On:S O U T H A N D W E S T E X T E R I O R E L E V A T I O N S - V I C ALL DESIGNS, IDEAS ARRANGEMENTS AND PLANS I N D I C AT E D B Y T H E S E D R AW I N G S A N D SPECI FICATIONS ARE THE P RO PERTY AND COPYRIGHT OF KIM RAYMOND ARCHITECTS, INC. AND SHALL NEITHER BE USED ON ANY OTHER WORK NOR BE USED BY ANY OTHER PERSON FOR ANY USE WHATSOEVER WITHOUT WRITTEN PERMISSION. WRITTEN DIMENSIONS SHALL TAKE PRECEDENCE OVER SCALED DIMENSIONS AND SHALL BE VERIFIED AT THE SITE. ANY DIMENSIONAL DISCREPANCY SHALL BE BROUGHT TO THE ATTENTION OF THE ARCHITECT PRIOR TO COMMENCEMENT OF WORK. IF THE ABOVE DIMENSION DOES NO T MEASURE ON E INCH (1 ") EXACTLY, THIS DRAWING WILL HAVE BEEN ENLARGED OR REDUCED, AFFECTING ALL LABELED SCALES. 1" ACTUAL AS NOTED DATE w w w . K i m R a y m o n d A r c h i t e c t s . c o m t e l 9 7 0 - 9 2 5 - 2 2 5 2 e m a i l k i m @ k r a i . u s 9/18/14 5 3 0 W H A L L A M V I C T O R I A N R E N O V A T I O N 5 3 0 W H A L L A M S T R E E T SCHEMATIC A S P E N , C O 1/26/15 HPC SUBMITTAL A A A A A A C C C C C C D D D D D D 1 '-2 " 9 '-1 0 " 2 4 '-1 0 3 /4 "15'-3 1/2" 3 '-0 " EXISTING SHAKE AND WOOD GRILLE DETAIL TO REMAIN RECONSTRUCT EXISTING BRICK CHIMNEY PER HPC PHOTO NEW ZINC STANDING SEAM ROOF BUTT-JOINT SMOOTH WOOD SIDING CEMENTITOUS PANELS GLASS AND STEEL RAIL NEW WOOD SHINGLES UPPER LEVEL PLY 109'-10" MAIN LEVEL PLY 100'-0" UPPER LEVEL PLY 110'-2" MAIN LEVEL PLY 100'-0" MAIN LEVEL PLY 89'-0" LINK UPPER LEVEL PLATE 120'-8" EXISTING STONE FOUNDATION TO BE APPLIED AS VENEER ON NEW CONCRETE FDN, MATCH EXISTING ELEVATION 7 7 8 8 9 9 EXISTING SHAKE AND WOOD GRILLE DETAIL TO REMAIN EXISTING BRICK CHIMNEY BE REBUILT PER HPC PHOTO INSTALL DOUBLE- HUNG WINDOW TO MATCH HPC PHOTO NEW WOOD SHINGLES UPPER LEVEL PLY 109'-10" MAIN LEVEL PLY 100'-0" MATCH EXISTING PORCH TRIM PER HPC PHOTO SCALE: 3/16" = 1'-0" WEST ELEVATION VIC P 1 1 1 I V . A . Scale: ISSUE AV 3.1 2/3/15Plotted On:N O R T H A N D E A S T E X T E R I O R E L E V A T I O N S - V I C ALL DESIGNS, IDEAS ARRANGEMENTS AND PLANS I N D I C AT E D B Y T H E S E D R AW I N G S A N D SPECI FICATIONS ARE THE P RO PERTY AND COPYRIGHT OF KIM RAYMOND ARCHITECTS, INC. AND SHALL NEITHER BE USED ON ANY OTHER WORK NOR BE USED BY ANY OTHER PERSON FOR ANY USE WHATSOEVER WITHOUT WRITTEN PERMISSION. WRITTEN DIMENSIONS SHALL TAKE PRECEDENCE OVER SCALED DIMENSIONS AND SHALL BE VERIFIED AT THE SITE. ANY DIMENSIONAL DISCREPANCY SHALL BE BROUGHT TO THE ATTENTION OF THE ARCHITECT PRIOR TO COMMENCEMENT OF WORK. IF THE ABOVE DIMENSION DOES NO T MEASURE ON E INCH (1 ") EXACTLY, THIS DRAWING WILL HAVE BEEN ENLARGED OR REDUCED, AFFECTING ALL LABELED SCALES. 1" ACTUAL AS NOTED DATE w w w . K i m R a y m o n d A r c h i t e c t s . c o m t e l 9 7 0 - 9 2 5 - 2 2 5 2 e m a i l k i m @ k r a i . u s 9/18/14 5 3 0 W H A L L A M V I C T O R I A N R E N O V A T I O N 5 3 0 W H A L L A M S T R E E T SCHEMATIC A S P E N , C O 1/26/15 HPC SUBMITTAL 9 9 8 8 7 7 2 5 '-0 " D D D D D D C C C C C C A A A A A A 6 '-1 1 1 /4 " EXISTING SHAKE DETAIL TO REMAIN RECONSTRUCT EXISTING BRICK CHIMNEY PER HPC PHOTO EXISTING SIDING AND TRIM TO REMAIN EXISTING GREEN METAL ROOF TO BE REPLACED WITH CLASS A WOOD SHAKE PER HPC NEW ZINC STANDING SEAM ROOF BUTT-JOINT SMOOTH WOOD SIDING CEMENTITOUS PANELS GLASS AND STEEL RAIL SCALE: 3/16" = 1'-0" NORTH ELEVATION SCALE: 3/16" = 1'-0" EAST ELEVATION VIC P 1 1 2 I V . A . Scale: ISSUE A 1.1 2/3/15Plotted On:F A R C A L C U L A T I O N S - P R O P O S E D V I C T O R I A N ALL DESIGNS, IDEAS ARRANGEMENTS AND PLANS I N D I C AT E D B Y T H E S E D R AW I N G S A N D SPECI FICATIONS ARE THE P RO PERTY AND COPYRIGHT OF KIM RAYMOND ARCHITECTS, INC. AND SHALL NEITHER BE USED ON ANY OTHER WORK NOR BE USED BY ANY OTHER PERSON FOR ANY USE WHATSOEVER WITHOUT WRITTEN PERMISSION. WRITTEN DIMENSIONS SHALL TAKE PRECEDENCE OVER SCALED DIMENSIONS AND SHALL BE VERIFIED AT THE SITE. ANY DIMENSIONAL DISCREPANCY SHALL BE BROUGHT TO THE ATTENTION OF THE ARCHITECT PRIOR TO COMMENCEMENT OF WORK. IF THE ABOVE DIMENSION DOES NO T MEASURE ON E INCH (1 ") EXACTLY, THIS DRAWING WILL HAVE BEEN ENLARGED OR REDUCED, AFFECTING ALL LABELED SCALES. 1" ACTUAL AS NOTED DATE w w w . K i m R a y m o n d A r c h i t e c t s . c o m t e l 9 7 0 - 9 2 5 - 2 2 5 2 e m a i l k i m @ k r a i . u s 9/18/14 5 3 0 W H A L L A M V I C T O R I A N R E N O V A T I O N 5 3 0 W H A L L A M S T R E E T SCHEMATIC A S P E N , C O 1/26/15 HPC SUBMITTAL A C D A C D 8 8 7 7 9 9 A C D 16 R. @ 7 1/2"15 T. @ 12" 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 910111213141516 5 1/2"5'-0" 1 1 '-7 1 /4 " 3 '-3 1 /2 " 21'-6 1/2" 1 2 3 4623 sq ft 233 sq ft DECK ROOF OVERHANG BELOW GAS FIREPLACE W/ STEEL SURROUND MASTER SUITE F R O S T E D G L A S S E N C L O S U R E CLEAR GLASS ENCLOSURE TV STEAM SHOWER STONE VENEER ON WALL LOWER ENTRY ROOF FREE STANDING TUB T.O. PLY 110'-2" OPEN TO BELOW A C D A C D 8 8 7 7 9 9 A C D F D W 16 R. @ 7 1/2"15 T. @ 12" 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 910111213141516 5 1/2"13'-0"5 1/2" 5 1/2"24'-5 3/4"5 1/2" 5 1 /2 " 1 5 '-7 " 5 1 /2 " 5'-3"2'-0"5 1/2"14'-9 1/2"2'-10 3/4" 4'-6" 4 2 A 4.2 5 2 A 4.1 532 sq ft 635 sq ft 569 sq ft 43 sq ft UP DN MUD ROOM LIVING DINING FP TV ACID ETCHED GLASS OR PERFORATED STL ENTRY PORCH KITCHEN POWDER OPEN TO ABOVE REMOVE EXISTING FLOOR ADD STEEL AND WOOD TRUSSES IN VOLUME CUBBIES AND BENCH F R O S T E D G L A S S P A N E L LINE OF EXTERIOR WALL ABOVE L I N E O F E X T E R I O R W A L L A B O V E T.O. PLY 100'-0" T.O. SLAB 100'-0" GARAGE P A N T R Y PATIO C D C D 8 8 7 7 9 9 C D CD W 4 ' - 9 1 / 2 "4 '-9 1 /2 " 7'-2 1/2" 8'-1/4" 2 6 '-7 1 /4 " 5 1 '-8 1 /2 " 8 " 22'-0" 1 0 '-1 1 /4 " 5 '-6 " 5 '-8 " 3 1/2"13'-0"5 1/2"10'-1/2"3 1/2" 3 1/2"5'-6"3 1/2"15'-1/2"8" 6 '-0 " 26'-11 1/4" 4"3'-4 3/4" 4 '-1 1 1 /4 " 3 1 /2 " 5 '-6 1 /4 " 5 1 /2 " 1 3 '-0 " 3 1 /2 " 4 '-6 " 1 4 '-7 " 1,895 sq ft BEDROOM 3 BEDROOM 2 FAMILY ROOM W I N D O W W E L L W I N D O W W E L L CLOSET DRESSER LAUNDRY O P E N R I S E R S , S T E E L S T A I R S G L A S S R A I L I N G BEDROOM 4 F P a n d T V B A T H 4 C L E A R G L A S S A T S H O W E R FROSTED GLASS AT WC MECHANICAL W I N D O W W E L L F L O A T I N G B E N C H BATH 3 BATH 2 T.O. SLAB 89'-0" SCALE: 3/16" = 1'-0" UPPER LEVEL FAR- PROPOSED SCALE: 3/16" = 1'-0" MAIN LEVEL FAR- PROPOSED SCALE: 3/16" = 1'-0" LOWER LEVEL FAR- PROPOSED LOWER LEVEL GROSS 1912 SF (X 5.6%) = 107 SF MAIN LEVEL GROSS (594+635) 1229 SF UPPER LEVEL GROSS 622 SF MAIN LEVEL DECKS: FRONT PORCH 43 SF (EXEMPT) UPPER LEVEL DECKS 190 SF (EXEMPT) TOTAL PROPOSED FAR 1958+180 = 2138 SF GARAGE 555 SF (-375 EXEMPTION) 180 SF INTERIOR FAR 1958 SF VICTORIAN CALCULATIONS P 1 1 3 I V . A . Scale: ISSUE AV 9.2 2/3/15Plotted On:R E V I S E D V I C T O R I A N , N /S S T A I R S 3 D V I E W S ALL DESIGNS, IDEAS ARRANGEMENTS AND PLANS I N D I C AT E D B Y T H E S E D R AW I N G S A N D SPECI FICATIONS ARE THE P RO PERTY AND COPYRIGHT OF KIM RAYMOND ARCHITECTS, INC. AND SHALL NEITHER BE USED ON ANY OTHER WORK NOR BE USED BY ANY OTHER PERSON FOR ANY USE WHATSOEVER WITHOUT WRITTEN PERMISSION. WRITTEN DIMENSIONS SHALL TAKE PRECEDENCE OVER SCALED DIMENSIONS AND SHALL BE VERIFIED AT THE SITE. ANY DIMENSIONAL DISCREPANCY SHALL BE BROUGHT TO THE ATTENTION OF THE ARCHITECT PRIOR TO COMMENCEMENT OF WORK. IF THE ABOVE DIMENSION DOES NO T MEASURE ON E INCH (1 ") EXACTLY, THIS DRAWING WILL HAVE BEEN ENLARGED OR REDUCED, AFFECTING ALL LABELED SCALES. 1" ACTUAL AS NOTED DATE w w w . K i m R a y m o n d A r c h i t e c t s . c o m t e l 9 7 0 - 9 2 5 - 2 2 5 2 e m a i l k i m @ k r a i . u s 9/18/14 5 3 0 W H A L L A M V I C T O R I A N R E N O V A T I O N 5 3 0 W H A L L A M S T R E E T SCHEMATIC A S P E N , C O 1/26/15 HPC SUBMITTAL DIRECT VIEW HALLAM 3/8" = 1'-0" CORNER OF 5TH & HALLAM3/8" = 1'-0" 5TH AVE VIEW 1:29.80 P 1 1 4 I V . A . Scale: ISSUE M 2/3/15Plotted On:P R O P O S E D F L O O R P L A N - M O D E R N ALL DESIGNS, IDEAS ARRANGEMENTS AND PLANS I N D I C AT E D B Y T H E S E D R AW I N G S A N D SPECI FICATIONS ARE THE P RO PERTY AND COPYRIGHT OF KIM RAYMOND ARCHITECTS, INC. AND SHALL NEITHER BE USED ON ANY OTHER WORK NOR BE USED BY ANY OTHER PERSON FOR ANY USE WHATSOEVER WITHOUT WRITTEN PERMISSION. WRITTEN DIMENSIONS SHALL TAKE PRECEDENCE OVER SCALED DIMENSIONS AND SHALL BE VERIFIED AT THE SITE. ANY DIMENSIONAL DISCREPANCY SHALL BE BROUGHT TO THE ATTENTION OF THE ARCHITECT PRIOR TO COMMENCEMENT OF WORK. IF THE ABOVE DIMENSION DOES NO T MEASURE ON E INCH (1 ") EXACTLY, THIS DRAWING WILL HAVE BEEN ENLARGED OR REDUCED, AFFECTING ALL LABELED SCALES. 1" ACTUAL AS NOTED DATE w w w . K i m R a y m o n d A r c h i t e c t s . c o m t e l 9 7 0 - 9 2 5 - 2 2 5 2 e m a i l k i m @ k r a i . u s 9/18/14 5 3 0 W H A L L A M V I C T O R I A N R E N O V A T I O N 5 3 0 W H A L L A M S T R E E T SCHEMATIC A S P E N , C O 1/26/15 HPC SUBMITTAL B 1 2 3 4 123456789 1 0 1 1 1 2 1 3 1 4 1 5 1 6 1 7 1 8 21 AM 3.5 22'-5 1/2" 1 5 '-1 /2 " 5 1/2"12'-10"3 1/2"19'-0" 1 9 '-5 3 /4 " 1 5 '-3 /4 " 5 1 /2 " 7 '-1 /2 " 5 1 /2 " 1 1 '-6 1 /2 " DECK FP MASTER SUITE TV LOWER ROOF AT GARAGE CLEAR GLASS ENCLOSURE AT SHOWER FROSTED GLASS ENCLOSURE AT WC FREE STANDING TUB BENCH T.O. PLY 110'-2" B B 1 2 3 4 5 A C D A C D A C D 123456789 1 0 1 1 1 2 1 3 1 4 1 5 1 6 1 7 1 8 CD W 5 '-8 " 5 '-8 " 8 " 1 3 '-7 3 /4 " 3 1 /2 " 2 1 '-3 1 /2 "3 1/2"13'-4 1/4"3 1/2" 7 0 '-1 1 1 /4 " 8'-3/4" 6'-9 1/2" 36'-11" 7'-0"13'-10 1/2"8'-6"7'-6 3/4" 1 5 '-3 1 /4 " 2 6 '-8 1 /2 " 1 1 '-5 1 /4 " 1 7 '-6 1 /4 " 5 '-6 " OFFICE BEDROOM 2 BEDROOM 3 BEDROOM 4 LAUNDRY B O O K S H E L V E S D E S K linen FROSTED GLASS AT WC CLEAR GLASS AT STEAM SHOWER MECHANICAL W I N D O W W E L L W I N D O W W E L L W I N D O W W E L L GLASS RAIL AT STAIR BATH AND POWDER F R O S T E D G L A S S A T W C CLEAR GLASS AT SHOWER TV WALL T V W A L L T V W A L L A/V EQUIPMENT STORAGE FAMILY ROOM WET BAR DRESSER CLEAR GLASS AT SHOWER T.O. SLAB 89'-0" B B 1 2 3 4 5 A C D A C D A C D F 123456789 1 0 1 1 1 2 1 3 1 4 1 5 1 6 1 7 1 8 5 '-0 " 6'-11 1/2"5 1/2"22'-5 1/2"5 1/2"6'-5 1/2" 5 1 /2 " 2 1 '-2 " 5 1 /2 " 1 3 '-7 1 /4 " 5 1 /2 " 1 7 '-2 1 /2 " 5 1 /2 " 2 '-3 " 9 '-7 3 /4 " 1 9 '-3 " 4 '-3 1 /2 " 2 5 '-9 " 2 1 '-7 1 /2 " 1 3 '-1 1 1 /4 " 2 5 '-6 " 1 8 '-9 3 /4 " 2 8 '-1 0 1 /2 " 5'-11"26'-8"5'-3 1/2" 4 '-0 " 2'-3" 16'-10 3/4"21'-1" 37'-11 3/4" GARAGE APRON / DRIVEWAY EXISTING TREE TO REMAIN, IF POSSIBLE SETBACK LINE S E T B A C K L I N E P R O P E R T Y L I N E GARAGE APRON / DRIVEWAY EXISTING TREE TO REMAIN, IF POSSIBLE SETBACK LINE S E T B A C K L I N E P R O P E R T Y L I N E POWDER MUD ROOM DINING LIVING KITCHEN BUTLER'S PANTRY GARAGE ACID ETCHED GLASS OR PERFORATED STL ENTRY BUFFET T V A N D F P WALL OF APPLIANCES G A R B A G E E N C L O S U R E G L A S S E N C L O S E D W I N E C A B I N E T COVERED PORCH PATIO T.O. PLY 100'-0" T.O. SLAB 100'-0" FRONT PORCH ACID ETCHED GLASS WALL LINE OF EXISTING FRONT OF HOUSE SCALE: 3/16" = 1'-0" UPPER LEVEL PLAN SCALE: 3/16" = 1'-0" -1. LOWER LEVEL PLAN SCALE: 3/16" = 1'-0" MAIN LEVEL PLAN P 1 1 5 I V . A . Scale: ISSUE AM 3.2 2/3/15Plotted On:S O U T H A N D W E S T E L E V A T I O N - M O D ALL DESIGNS, IDEAS ARRANGEMENTS AND PLANS I N D I C AT E D B Y T H E S E D R AW I N G S A N D SPECI FICATIONS ARE THE P RO PERTY AND COPYRIGHT OF KIM RAYMOND ARCHITECTS, INC. AND SHALL NEITHER BE USED ON ANY OTHER WORK NOR BE USED BY ANY OTHER PERSON FOR ANY USE WHATSOEVER WITHOUT WRITTEN PERMISSION. WRITTEN DIMENSIONS SHALL TAKE PRECEDENCE OVER SCALED DIMENSIONS AND SHALL BE VERIFIED AT THE SITE. ANY DIMENSIONAL DISCREPANCY SHALL BE BROUGHT TO THE ATTENTION OF THE ARCHITECT PRIOR TO COMMENCEMENT OF WORK. IF THE ABOVE DIMENSION DOES NO T MEASURE ON E INCH (1 ") EXACTLY, THIS DRAWING WILL HAVE BEEN ENLARGED OR REDUCED, AFFECTING ALL LABELED SCALES. 1" ACTUAL AS NOTED DATE w w w . K i m R a y m o n d A r c h i t e c t s . c o m t e l 9 7 0 - 9 2 5 - 2 2 5 2 e m a i l k i m @ k r a i . u s 9/18/14 5 3 0 W H A L L A M V I C T O R I A N R E N O V A T I O N 5 3 0 W H A L L A M S T R E E T SCHEMATIC A S P E N , C O 1/26/15 HPC SUBMITTAL A A A A A A B B C C C C C C D D D D D D 2 5 '-0 " 5 '-6 " UPPER LEVEL PLY 110'-2" MAIN LEVEL PLY 100'-0" UPPER LEVEL PLY 120'-5" MAIN LEVEL PLY 89'-0" 1 1 2 2 3 3 4 4 5 5 SCALE: 3/16" = 1'-0" WEST ELEVATION MOD SCALE: 3/16" = 1'-0" SOUTH ELEVATION VIC P 1 1 6 I V . A . Scale: ISSUE AM 3.3 2/3/15Plotted On:N O R T H A N D E A S T E L E V A T I O N - M O D ALL DESIGNS, IDEAS ARRANGEMENTS AND PLANS I N D I C AT E D B Y T H E S E D R AW I N G S A N D SPECI FICATIONS ARE THE P RO PERTY AND COPYRIGHT OF KIM RAYMOND ARCHITECTS, INC. AND SHALL NEITHER BE USED ON ANY OTHER WORK NOR BE USED BY ANY OTHER PERSON FOR ANY USE WHATSOEVER WITHOUT WRITTEN PERMISSION. WRITTEN DIMENSIONS SHALL TAKE PRECEDENCE OVER SCALED DIMENSIONS AND SHALL BE VERIFIED AT THE SITE. ANY DIMENSIONAL DISCREPANCY SHALL BE BROUGHT TO THE ATTENTION OF THE ARCHITECT PRIOR TO COMMENCEMENT OF WORK. IF THE ABOVE DIMENSION DOES NO T MEASURE ON E INCH (1 ") EXACTLY, THIS DRAWING WILL HAVE BEEN ENLARGED OR REDUCED, AFFECTING ALL LABELED SCALES. 1" ACTUAL AS NOTED DATE w w w . K i m R a y m o n d A r c h i t e c t s . c o m t e l 9 7 0 - 9 2 5 - 2 2 5 2 e m a i l k i m @ k r a i . u s 9/18/14 5 3 0 W H A L L A M V I C T O R I A N R E N O V A T I O N 5 3 0 W H A L L A M S T R E E T SCHEMATIC A S P E N , C O 1/26/15 HPC SUBMITTAL 5 5 4 4 3 3 2 2 1 1 D D D D D D C C C C C C B B A A A A A A 2 4 '-6 " 5 '-6 3 /4 " 1/3 POINT OF 12/12 SLOPED ROOF SCALE: 3/16" = 1'-0" NORTH ELEVATION SCALE: 3/16" = 1'-0" EAST ELEVATION MOD P 1 1 7 I V . A . Scale: ISSUE A1.2 2/3/15Plotted On:F A R C A L C U L A T I O N S - P R O P O S E D M O D E R N ALL DESIGNS, IDEAS ARRANGEMENTS AND PLANS I N D I C AT E D B Y T H E S E D R AW I N G S A N D SPECI FICATIONS ARE THE P RO PERTY AND COPYRIGHT OF KIM RAYMOND ARCHITECTS, INC. AND SHALL NEITHER BE USED ON ANY OTHER WORK NOR BE USED BY ANY OTHER PERSON FOR ANY USE WHATSOEVER WITHOUT WRITTEN PERMISSION. WRITTEN DIMENSIONS SHALL TAKE PRECEDENCE OVER SCALED DIMENSIONS AND SHALL BE VERIFIED AT THE SITE. ANY DIMENSIONAL DISCREPANCY SHALL BE BROUGHT TO THE ATTENTION OF THE ARCHITECT PRIOR TO COMMENCEMENT OF WORK. IF THE ABOVE DIMENSION DOES NO T MEASURE ON E INCH (1 ") EXACTLY, THIS DRAWING WILL HAVE BEEN ENLARGED OR REDUCED, AFFECTING ALL LABELED SCALES. 1" ACTUAL AS NOTED DATE w w w . K i m R a y m o n d A r c h i t e c t s . c o m t e l 9 7 0 - 9 2 5 - 2 2 5 2 e m a i l k i m @ k r a i . u s 9/18/14 5 3 0 W H A L L A M V I C T O R I A N R E N O V A T I O N 5 3 0 W H A L L A M S T R E E T SCHEMATIC A S P E N , C O 1/26/15 HPC SUBMITTAL B B 1 2 3 4 5 C D C D C D 123456789 1 0 1 1 1 2 1 3 1 4 1 5 1 6 1 7 1 8 21 AM 3.5 22'-5 1/2" 1 5 '-1 /2 " 5 1/2"12'-10"3 1/2"19'-0" 1 9 '-5 3 /4 " 1 5 '-3 /4 " 5 1 /2 " 7 '-1 /2 " 5 1 /2 " 1 1 '-6 1 /2 " 1 2 3 4 4.5 719 sq ft 175 sq ft DECK FP MASTER SUITE TV LOWER ROOF AT GARAGE CLEAR GLASS ENCLOSURE AT SHOWER FROSTED GLASS ENCLOSURE AT WC FREE STANDING TUB BENCH T.O. PLY 110'-2" B B 1 2 3 4 5 C D C D C D F 123456789 1 0 1 1 1 2 1 3 1 4 1 5 1 6 1 7 1 8 6'-11 1/2"5 1/2"22'-5 1/2"5 1/2"6'-5 1/2" 5 1 /2 " 2 1 '-2 " 5 1 /2 " 1 3 '-7 1 /4 " 5 1 /2 " 1 7 '-2 1 /2 " 5 1 /2 " 2 '-3 " 9 '-7 3 /4 " 1 9 '-3 " 4 '-3 1 /2 " 2 5 '-9 " 2 1 '-7 1 /2 " 1 3 '-1 1 1 /4 " 2 5 '-6 " 1 8 '-9 3 /4 " 2 8 '-1 0 1 /2 " 22'-8"15'-3 3/4" 5'-11"26'-8"5'-3 1/2" 4 '-0 " 2'-3" 21 AM 3.5 4 2 A 4.2 1 234.4 1 2 3 4 4.4 1,462 sq ft 549 sq ft 92 sq ft 28 sq ft POWDER MUD ROOM DINING LIVING KITCHEN BUTLER'S PANTRY GARAGE ACID ETCHED GLASS OR PERFORATED STL ENTRY BUFFET T V A N D F P WALL OF APPLIANCES G A R B A G E E N C L O S U R E G L A S S E N C L O S E D W I N E C A B I N E T COVERED PORCH PATIO T.O. PLY 100'-0" T.O. SLAB 100'-0" FRONT PORCH ACID ETCHED GLASS WALL B B 1 2 2 3 4 5 C D C D C D 123456789 1 0 1 1 1 2 1 3 1 4 1 5 1 6 1 7 1 8 CD W 5 '-8 " 5 '-8 " 3 1 /2 " 4 '-8 3 /4 " 3 1 /2 " 1 3 '-5 1 /4 " 3 1 /2 " 8 '-4 1 /4 " 3 1 /2 " 6 '-3 /4 " 3 1 /2 " 8 " 1 3 '-7 3 /4 " 3 1 /2 " 2 1 '-3 1 /2 "3 1/2"13'-4 1/4"3 1/2" 3 1/2"22'-7 1/2"3 1/2"13'-4 1/4"3 1/2" 1 2 '-6 1 /4 " 7 0 '-1 1 1 /4 " 8'-3/4" 6'-9 1/2" 7'-0"13'-10 1/2"8'-6"7'-6 3/4" 1 2 '-6 1 /4 " 1 5 '-3 1 /4 " 2 6 '-8 1 /2 " 1 1 '-5 1 /4 " 1 7 '-6 1 /4 " 5 '-6 " 2,177 sq ft OFFICE BEDROOM 2 BEDROOM 3 BEDROOM 4 LAUNDRY B O O K S H E L V E S D E S K linen FROSTED GLASS AT WC CLEAR GLASS AT STEAM SHOWER MECHANICAL W I N D O W W E L L W I N D O W W E L L W I N D O W W E L L GLASS RAIL AT STAIR BATH AND POWDER F R O S T E D G L A S S A T W C CLEAR GLASS AT SHOWER TV WALL T V W A L L T V W A L L A/V EQUIPMENT STORAGE FAMILY ROOM WET BAR DRESSER CLEAR GLASS AT SHOWER T.O. SLAB 89'-0" SCALE: 3/16" = 1'-0" UPPER LEVEL FAR- PROPOSED SCALE: 3/16" = 1'-0" MAIN LEVEL FAR- PROPOSED SCALE: 3/16" = 1'-0" LOWER LEVEL FAR- PROPOSED LOWER LEVEL GROSS 2177 SF (X 5.7%) = 124 SF MAIN LEVEL GROSS 1378 SF UPPER LEVEL GROSS 710 SF MAIN LEVEL DECKS: FRONT PORCH 146 SF (EXEMPT) BCK PORCH <4' 22 SF (EXEMPT) UPPER LEVEL DECKS 162 SF (EXEMPT) TOTAL PROPOSED FAR 2212+222 = 2434 SF GARAGE 597 SF (-375 EXEMPTION) 222 SF INTERIOR FAR 2212 SF MODERN CALCULATIONS P 1 1 8 I V . A . Scale: ISSUE A P.1 2/3/15Plotted On:S T R E E T S C A P E ALL DESIGNS, IDEAS ARRANGEMENTS AND PLANS I N D I C AT E D B Y T H E S E D R AW I N G S A N D SPECI FICATIONS ARE THE P RO PERTY AND COPYRIGHT OF KIM RAYMOND ARCHITECTS, INC. AND SHALL NEITHER BE USED ON ANY OTHER WORK NOR BE USED BY ANY OTHER PERSON FOR ANY USE WHATSOEVER WITHOUT WRITTEN PERMISSION. WRITTEN DIMENSIONS SHALL TAKE PRECEDENCE OVER SCALED DIMENSIONS AND SHALL BE VERIFIED AT THE SITE. ANY DIMENSIONAL DISCREPANCY SHALL BE BROUGHT TO THE ATTENTION OF THE ARCHITECT PRIOR TO COMMENCEMENT OF WORK. IF THE ABOVE DIMENSION DOES NO T MEASURE ON E INCH (1 ") EXACTLY, THIS DRAWING WILL HAVE BEEN ENLARGED OR REDUCED, AFFECTING ALL LABELED SCALES. 1" ACTUAL AS NOTED DATE w w w . K i m R a y m o n d A r c h i t e c t s . c o m t e l 9 7 0 - 9 2 5 - 2 2 5 2 e m a i l k i m @ k r a i . u s 9/18/14 5 3 0 W H A L L A M V I C T O R I A N R E N O V A T I O N 5 3 0 W H A L L A M S T R E E T SCHEMATIC A S P E N , C O 1/26/15 HPC SUBMITTAL P 1 1 9 I V . A . r . �; ,•r '�� 1 � �� ► ,�,. EXHIBJT�Z ,,�z ,D7 PF ��•�'�� I- ��lam' o- :� .�. WEST VIEWisCO • t 11 _ .. . . Lu Z .. • BLEEKER STREET ,► 11 1� z � -nr M Arne z > rn � C � rnrnz > z � > nr rnr > IZ- zz 00 = rn r � � rn � � > cs► � � �t Cdr n � > m � � � zrnr r r z � rn i i Mod Link & HISTORIC MODERN DUPLEX cG Master 232 E SLEEKER ' ; A Materials K1 m F a y m o n d A r c h I t e c t s , In ASPEN, CO 970-925-2252 2/10/15 t •�.� . , ''• alit �_ o���lt�llllll titll itttt iif����ii�itrr� 4 9" 4. - " y HISTORIC •D •• Stair 232 E BLEEKER ASPEN, CO + • 2/10/15 SIDING AT NEW DORMER TO BE SAME DIMENSION AS I ` EXISTING;WITH SLIGHTLY DIFFERENT PROFILE II I RECESS LINK BEHIND RESEARH AND REPLACE ,,v E i(STING HISTORIC CORNER i THE METAL CHIMNEY POT E SHOWN IN HISTORIC PHOTOS o (NOT SHOWN HERE DUE TO E LACK OF INFORMATION) CONFIRM EXTENSION TO m I I EXISTING HISTORIC CHIMNEY E ROOF TO BE GLASS AWOOD • Y SHINGLES BUTT-JOINTED WHITE ORIZONTA,L yNOOD SIDING EXISTING GORNERBOARDS TO REMAIN VISIBLE H G reD. REMOVE EXISTING REPLICA 'GINGERBREAD'TRIM of colo9 REPAIR OR O N REPLACE EXISTING MY GERp,t-11G TILE PANELS I ® ® ® COLUMNS TO MATCH HISTORIC �P AR,���J� WESTELEVATION REPAIR OR REPLACE EXISTING WOOD J V!1 SIDING TO MATCH HISTORIC SCALE:1/4' X W J W a � z o Q Q w I I I > Q W w 0 ww i m a, - � Q I � N co i ------------- TT-JOINTED WOOD HORIZONTAL SIDING 'a i i/�>/I♦xrc I]/ A xPO FAR PARFJN6 O niERV.LS z I -- _ 1/3T/55 xPC DORMERS Q WOOD LOUVERS APPLIED AS A RAIN SCREEN.OVER WHITE,BUTT JOINTED HORIZONTAL SIDING Q F kOSTED GLASS AND METAL GARAGE DOORS I co iRAMIC TILE THAT LOOKS LIKE BOARD FORM CONCRETE ScaE!`' A$NOTED w . IONEEll-1,TMIS x xµEi FLED SCALES. CilxD A Z O NORTH ELEVATION SCALE:1/4' A 4.1 IJ1 2 ta15 I Ndum EIPROJECTS MASTER-MINI232 BLEEKERI PLNS1232 BLEEKER 1.4.15.ph CERAMIC TILE PANELS C � O EXISTING ANGLED HISTORIC I I I E NINDOW HEAD TO REMAIN E RETAIN AND REFINISH E%ISTING I CERAMIC TILE THAT LOOKS LIKE 'ELT HISTORIC DOORS BOARD FORM CONCRETE COzo Q� P,NAYI.O 9.q C, i 3400 ySFo�Rc�v 4-BUTT JOINTED Y OOD SIDING PAINTED WHITE SOUTH ELEVATION SCALE:1/4' = i'-0' VV W J w a � � z) w Q I-BUTT-JOINTED WOODcc HORIZONTAL SIDING,PAINTED (, f WHITE W w w Z ASSURE EXISTING HISTORIC I FWgii w wCHIMNEY I5 CODE COMPLIANT 1/3 015TANCE FROM EAVE ` �y TO RIDGE LINE '�^^ FLOATING LOUVER SCREENv/ '- I OVER BUTT-JOINTED WHI E Q WOOD HORIZONTAL 51DIN O w EXISTING HON-HISTORIC DORMERS TO M BE REMOVED �_ N EXISTING HISTORIC CORNERBOARDS TO REMAIN VISIBLE GERAMIL TILE THAT LO • LI DATE ISSUE BOARD FORM CONCRE a HPL t/19/1 e...LpChTP•'.zS...vo.�M>Sa'.`2�'is:Yn ..:'.FTaNFXaFriSa[A4N —14 HPL FARPARRING 1/6/15 HP N—R— O 0 1/3t/19 HPL OORHERS vJ Z r�^ Scale: AS NOTED ooEs W Hw1DC' E.LARR rr/n�� LT1NL A vJ ca ELELsisFE 7 CERAMIC TILE PANELS i O EAST ELEVATION SCALE:114" = 1'-W /� /"'A 402 J Notumes/PROJECTS MASTER-MIN11232 BLEEKER/PLNS/232 BLEEKER 1.4,15.pin v1on5 w VARIABLE DIMENSION "GRASSCRETE"PERMEABLE PAVEMENT CONCRETE PAVERS PLANT SCHEDULE o•.:.: SYMBOL BOTANIC NAME COMMON NAME COUNT _ OFFSET CONCRETE STRIP PAVERS Populus angustifolia Narrowleaf Cottonwood 4 POSSIBLE REPLACEMENT STREET TREE ... , Comus alba 'red gnome' Red Gnome Dogwood 3 PATIO SOFA ;'. :• 2'TALL PLANTER WITH TALL GRASSES .• TO SCREEN SKYLIGHT FROM PATIO Nepeta x faassenii' Faassen's Catmint 32 PATIO PLANTER POT r T ` CONCRETE GAS FIRE FATURE WITH REARRudbeckia fulgida 'Golsturm' Black-Eyed Susan 28 SCREENING WALL ® GATE ANCHORED TO FIRE FEATURE ® Helictotrichon sempervirens Blue Avena 12 CONCRETE PAVERS t>Xr Festuca glauca 'Boulder Blue' Boulder Blue Fescue 16 tea-•- U I. s� PP z Iris x pumila cultivars Dwarf Iris 150 r +'�+ _ M Tulip cultivars Various Tulips NOTE: MIX AT EXISTING STREET TREE 1:1 RATIO LOW PROFILE SKYLIGHT CONCEALED BY SOD 1,440 SF SHRUBS TULIP AND IRIS MIX(TYP) NEW STREET EXISTING BRICK WROUGHT IRON FENCE MATCHING TREE (TYP) WALKWAY NEIGHBORHOOD CHARACTER SCALE: lin =20ft 1 _j I t 0 10 20 40 60 FEET NORTH DATE: SHEET: } STAN CLAUSON ASSOCIATES INC 29 JAN 2015 i landscape architecture. planning. resort designno AM LANDSCAPE PLAN - FENCE OPTION REVISION: 412 North Mill Street Aspen, Colorado 81611 KIM RAYMOND ARCHITECTS 232 E. BLEEKER ST. t. 970/925-2323 f. 970/9204628 ARCHITECTURE I INTERIORS I PLANNING 10 FEB 2015 OF 2 info@scaptanning.com www.scaptanning.com VARIABLE DIMENSION "GRASSCRETE" PERMEABLE PAVEMENT CONCRETE PAVERS PLANT SCHEDULE SYMBOL BOTANIC NAME COMMON NAME COUNT t I OFFSET CONCRETE STRIP PAVERS Populus angustifolia Narrowleaf Cottonwood 4 POSSIBLE REPLACEMENT STREET TREE Cornus alba 'red gnome' r t- -'. 9 Red Gnome Dogwood 3 b s PATIO SOFA 2'TALL PLANTER WITH TALL GRASSES . .. TO SCREEN SKYLIGHT FROM PATIO p to x faassene Faassen s Catmint 32 0 Ne e t• :t: :: PATIO PLANTER POT CONCRETE GAS FIRE FATURE WITH REAR 19Rudbeckia fulgida 'Go/sturm' Black-Eyed Susan 28 t•s •-• SCREENING WALL I: GATE ANCHORED TO FIRE FEATURE Helictotrichon sempervirens Blue Avena 12 CONCRETE PAVERS TT 1 0 *...1. _ Festuca glauca 'Boulder Blue' Boulder Blue Fescue 16 Aff. t. U I3t. rs Z :: t.•. 0 Iris x pumila cultivars Dwarf Iris 56 Tulip cultivars Various Tulips :. : :�: z NOTE: MIX AT - :-' EXISTING STREET TREE 1:1 RATIO LOW PROFILE SKYLIGHT CONCEALED BY SOD 1,600 SF 8 o' SHRUBS NEW STREET EXISTING BRICK TULIP AND IRIS MIX(TYP) TREE (TYP) WALKWAY SCALE: lin =20ft —1 1 t 0 10 20 40 60 FEET NORTH DATE: SHEET: 3 STAN CLAUSON ASSOCIATES INC 29JAN 2015 ! landscape architectureplanning. resort design tti LANDSCAPE PLAN - NO FENCE OPTION 412 North Mill Street Aspen, Colorado 81611 KIM RAYMOND ARCHITECTSg7o/gzo-1628 REVISION: 10 FEB 2015 C 970/925-2323 f. 232 E. SLEEKER ST. ARCHITECTURE I INTERIORS I PLANNING 20F2 info@)scaplanning.com www.scaplanning.com 181T 7 AFFIDAVIT OF PUBLIC NOTICE S REQUIRED BY SECTION 26.304.060 (E),ASPEN LAND USE CODE ADDRESS OF PROPERTY: L I C Aspen,CO SCHEDULED PUBLIC HEARING DATE: l l ,2015 STATE OF COLORADO ) ss. County of Pitkin ) I, Z (name, please print) beiAg or representing an Applicant to the City of Aspen, Colorado, hereby personally certify that I have complied with the public notice requirements of Section 26.304.060 (E) of the Aspen Land Use Code in the following manner: Publication of notice: By the publication in the legal notice section of an official paper or a paper of general circulation in the City of Aspen at least fifteen (15) days prior to the public hearing. A copy of the publication is attached hereto. Posting of notice: By posting of notice, which form was obtained from the Community Development Department, which was made of suitable, waterproof materials, which was not less than twenty-two (22) inches wide and twenty-six (26) inches high, and which was composed of letters not less than one inch in height. Said notice was posted at least fifteen(15) days prior to the public hearing on the*day of Q , 20__)J, to and including the date and time of the public hearing. Aphot6gi�ap#of the posted notice (sign) is attached hereto. Mailing of notice. By the mailing of a notice obtained from the Community Development Department, which contains the information described in Section 26.304.060(E)(2) of the Aspen Land Use Code. At least fifteen (15) days prior to the public hearing, notice was hand delivered or mailed by first class postage prepaid U.S. mail to all owners of property within three hundred (300) feet of the property subject to the development application. The names and addresses of property owners shall be those on the current tax records of Pitkin County as they appeared no more than sixty (60) days prior to the date of the public hearing. A copy of the owners and governmental agencies so noticed is attached hereto. Neighborhood Outreach: Applicant attests that neighborhood outreach, summarized and attached, was conducted prior to the first public hearing as required in Section 26.304.035, Neighborhood Outreach. A copy of the neighborhood outreach summary, including the method of public notification and a copy of any documentation that was presented to the public is attached hereto. (continued on next page) Mineral Estate Owner Notice. By the certified mailing of notice, return receipt requested, to affected mineral estate owners by at least thirty (30) days prior to the date scheduled for the .initial public hearing on the application of development. The names and addresses of mineral estate owners shall be those on the current tax records of Pitkin County. At a minimum, Subdivisions, SPAs or PUDs that create more than one lot, new Planned Unit Developments, and new Specially Planned Areas, are subject to this notice requirement. Rezoning or text amendment. Whenever the official zoning district map is in any way to be changed or amended incidental to or as part of a general revision of this Title, or whenever the text of this Title is to be amended, whether such revision be made by repeal of this Title and enactment of a new land use regulation, or otherwise, the requirement of an accurate survey map or other sufficient legal description of, and.the notice.to and listing of names and addresses of owners of real property in the area of the proposed change shall be waived. However, the proposed zoning map shall be available for public inspection in the planning agency during all business hours for fifteen (15) days prior to the public hearing on such amendments. Signature � The f going"Affidavit of Notice"was a knowle ged befor me thisLay of , 20_L5, by. WITNESS MY HAND AND OFFICIAL SEAL TERESA HUFIy ER HIRSCH commissi ices: I ICO NOTARY PUBLIC STATE OF COLORADO Nom ID 20094021150 tary Public Nty CWML ExWes 07/01/2017 ATTACHMENTS AS APPLICABLE: • COPYOFTHEPUBLICATION • PHOTOGRAPH OF THE POSTED NOTICE(SIGN) • LIST OF THE OWNERS AND GOVERNMENTAL AGENCIES NOTICED BYMAIL • APPLICANT CERTIFICATION OF MINERAL ESTAE OWNERS NOTICE AS MREQ.UIRED BY C.R.S. §24-65.5-103.3 MU ; FEB CITY Cep At, COMMI)O!TY nppl'P- �' f — 1.. a ahFf✓rJ � 1,: v�J t Geyy`�'4•tl^+��- `� _1 1 �'j jO Kot,� 'r. Y ' .. AF I r pkv I '.,gyp ea �rAGf,�"i" i�. L�.g�, sy� C s t °iA•ki• i at"^�S 5-N .i.14'> 2�1. �.� � .talk R'{al�{ �'�,F:C`'47• �, �� -. I � c.,`a'y - ,.N„�-�, 0.k :�)'I,i�� si.' � ��X� �,�: ' -r� r, :• }. :, s Pr.E t � °' f*" .: ..vt. t4 ,� f� � I �, ,i shS:, ' sit,. h F e sr Sw FS,FX ia � � F!Ly ► , MEW I t$t i�,,.)s ?�t4'�"U� ,�.d4,.. i 4i y, ,' _.•: .. ..,; ., r.`k I. �i fir. � aSIK��, �� < ,.,j` �,�N I .,rr� �FF 4^ �', '� i •r ' r �;... ' •. F�,A} E �'�X•.'N{l'1Fr°'� l ' �(S� � 1 � d it` � �� ��.. 'j'�. a a &_; � 'C,� �.•"�� 7 i .#�e t, dC< �` r�. �:s , � P� '��� yJ �K�g4` i I Nil TPAY x d.a p'hu. :.1"ki •. � �. �, .. r 5�:��r f tt � r'i.". ;g v. 'w+', r �'� ,iii r: ,f��'�rk ? "�°.,'"'�' 4�� C�{'erI .u,r 1#r.•'�thy 1,x,;1 .,y R � j ..-... .,,ys # .," � <��:.��ff iF.: �t� `f�3 'd �'.(" i����: ,t�.�'(. � `F -'N ,a;'.. at # F 111 : i ,��a��'K,•.j a t d �t1�F t ,i i I f�,�':*"pf >�� � �,.,fEr,�1�{g �: 'i p. r g h •�. ` rq r,', �),rkr, -"�.t :-�, '� k' :I �..1 re¢ .r, , : I I.- N ,�pp��4t r' `h!• 1� r`�.�� 'y � - �� t , .� }..} ,' 'i_ _.� •t�5 `�•fa*r� ° filrpt rldk k 4r , � x f, �p , 16�i �,1i+ t 1, i ;� ,,E"•y'i i sA.3'3:; � -tt r: - }yr` t I `-�-.. t -a _ F : i tr I ( 5 X ,I�` .� ��K ,�'. +t � r i y i�. �� �?: �'"" a• �� ";€ ,;,it,,. al. i,tt � � dA�i 6 E yy9p` _ 'IRI'9gv C,'r (� ry �Uik i^ 1.'�"•I,y � p�.w,[,,�rf, ��. ..,4 - in ku p t t- 1� y57Y 4` w • WV �'.I��n ��,. ?£�.t��.:'�'XY ;, ,}$s` '• i`" � ,rl irvr .'+,:., .' � �..... 1 a � V n d � �,.lu�:,.. .v_`k�v#�'ri'y;..,.y, µ �u�+:°'. :'y;, .}C" �': k 'I°s , fffff ei::. .r, r I._ .... .,.. .,:"r ' �.'.;,.d" .. :, v,:.. . �i. ...; .;.<.: }•'� ,��r �' y:" .; p." s { d�a ;�.:. �uC �e4..++., - ,,:3 ,i�;'.n,. :,4°"� ,,::', ,(; tl .e,'. �. 4 �I E �t 1'1..'^'y'q'i`r p f'�"""'*a ) jyx 4 ,��".�"'� �, ., .,6 1_ r ,,,.. T.. �"'..:.• �, ,... :. ~��V r�,^ �m �.n i't "'ht.. t fl.` - ><*+;�F..r �;.�,'d ;tt�.. ,;". y .'L .. � .-':' f.�':{.. yTp� •� ten. .,4 ..f, ,d.,.tli„+ Ste. z _ r T v Z T. , Tt IN k sem-,""".°•'- - ,A , e 111 Pf 441 40,5 r,7 z a.. .,._ ..fir.• _ PUBLIC NOTICE y` Date: VVed Feb.1 i,201,5 --- --- .� Time: 5-o0.p.nt, - -. - ..•''r?, - Puce: 130 S.Galena St.,City_. nall�Council_Chambers— Purpose: w hP�:..II ccnsi anapp h atior oy d LLC 0 33 Pmsn Uor . Lane S P=102.5,Aspen.90.8 161 i_ a - -. .,tecilnq this prop y F 2IllIcant - '4 .._ - „..as,•n+,,w ,a.n...- ssa,, recues s n-orevel-o r i r zlecmori behind the Vlconan,,ehlch - -- dl b es orea Setback 90o a ea_, .. e.^.AI be revi —. �:�;.__...__. - •- - .. design_�anances P n 9 Contne,the aspen Ian in 070-429 21,58^ — r , ItYj..�' _• ,,,w,u..c+.-r'@n'e,'.-+y'.n.�w,i-.y.-.•._�+e.5'r ,,,Y ��`vur.� .. �� � � � fy t�yx>:��A�f���akke{L,(S y'�,. �,t T d .ls � � •. _ l .. ! 4 _ 7 �• - y � sI 100 EAST MAIN STREET LLC 120 EAST MAIN PARTNERS LLC ASPEN COMMUNITY UNITED METHODIST 133 PROSPECTOR RD#4102 120 E MAIN ST CHURCH ASPEN, CO 81611 ASPEN,CO 81611 200 E BLEEKER ST ASPEN,CO 81611 CITY OF ASPEN COLLINS CINDA REV TRUST CRAWFORD RANDALL&ABIGAIL 130 S GALENA ST 42 PARK LN 124 N GARMISCH ST ASPEN, CO 81611 MINNEAPOLIS, MN 55416 ASPEN, CO 81611 DOMINGUE FAMILY TRUST GARCIA STEVEN J GARMISCH LODGING LLC PO BOX 2293 120 N GARMISCH 110 W MAIN ST WINTER PARK, FL 32790 ASPEN, CO 81611 ASPEN, CO 81611 GORMAN PATRICIA GSW FAMILY INV LP HENRY FREDERICK B TRUST 1426 ROSE GLEN RD 1320 HUNSICKER RD 100 W HALLAM ST GLADWYNE, PA 19035 LANCASTER, PA 17601 ASPEN, CO 81611 HODES ALAN & DEBORAH HOGUET CONSTANCE M JOHNSON RICHARD&MONTAE IMBT 114 N ASPEN ST. 333 E 68TH ST 6820 BRADBURY ASPEN, CO 81611 NEW YORK, NY 10065 DALLAS,TX 75230 KRUMM DONALD PAUL REV TRUST LANDIS CAROLYN MOUNTAIN STATE PROPERTIES LLC PO BOX 874 128 N GARMISCH ST 715 10TH ST SOUTH ASPEN, CO 81612 ASPEN, CO 81611 NAPLES, FL 34102 PARDUBA JIRI PENN PAUL E&SUSAN W RODNEY JOHN W 116 N GARMISCH ST 3830 E 79TH ST 8536 N GOLF DR ASPEN,CO 81612 INDIANAPOLIS, IN 46260-3457 PARADISE VALLEY,AZ 85253 ROSE BRANDON SARDY HOUSE NEW LLC SEGUIN WILLIAM L&MARILYN A 625 MT HOPE RD 240 CRAN DON BLVD#167 PO BOX 4274 WHARTON, NJ 07885 KEY BISCAYNE, FL 33149 ASPEN, CO 816124274 SPEARS NANCY M WOLKENMUTH EDWARD F JR&STEELE ZATS JULIE PO BOX 2630 JULIANNE BELL REV TRUST 118 N GARMISCH ASPEN, CO 81612 121 W BLEEKER ST ASPEN, CO 81611 ASPEN, CO 81611 AFFIDAVIT OF PUBLIC NOTICE REQUIRED BY SECTION 26.304.060 (E), ASPEN LAND USE CODE ADDRESS OF PROPERTY: 110 9 -4�>too6Ges' Cov-�c!::� Aspen, CO SCHEDULED PUBLIC HEARING DATE: Vim --7 it 4-> 5 ,0q nn , 201 S+ STATE OF COLORADO ) ss. County of Pitkin ) (name, please print) being or representing an Applicant to the City of Aspen, Colorado, hereby personally certify that I have complied with the public notice requirements of Section 26.304.060 (E) of the Aspen Land Use Code in the following manner: L-�PubliCati071 of 710tice: By the publication in the legal notice section of an official paper or a paper of general circulation in the City of Aspen at least fifteen (15). days prior to the public hearing. A copy of the publication is attached hereto. Posting of ri.otice: By posting of notice, which form was obtained from the Community Development Department, which was made of'suitable, waterproof materials, which was not less than twenty-two (22) inches wide and twenty-six (26) inches high, .and which was composed of letters not less than one inch in height. Said notice was posted at least fifteen(15) days prior to the public hearing on the day of , 20_, to and including the date and time of the public hearing. A photograph of the posted notice (sign) is attached hereto. Mailing of notice. By the mailing of a notice obtained from the Community Development Department, which contains the information described in Section 26.304.060(E)(2) of the Aspen Land Use Code. At least fifteen (15) days prior to the public hearing, notice was hand delivered or-mailed by first class postage prepaid U;S:-mail to all owners of property within three hundred (300) feet of the property, subject to the development application. The names and addresses of ._, 'A ..1.« p 1operty owners shall be those on the current tax records of Pitkin County as they appeared no more than sixty (60) days prior to the date of the public hearing. A the:ow77ers and governmental agencies so noticed is attached hereto. Neighborhood Outreach: Applicant attests that neighborhood outreach, summarized and attached, was conducted prior to the first public hearing as required in Section 26.304.035, Neighborhood Outreach. A copy of the neighborhood outreach summary, including the method of public notification and a copy of a77y documeWati077 that was presented to the public is attached hereto. (continued 071 next page) Mineral Estate Owner Notice. By the certified mailing of notice, return receipt requested, to affected mineral estate owners by at least thirty (3 0) days prior to the date scheduled for the initial public hearing on the application of development. The names and addresses of mineral estate .owners shall be those on the current tax records of Pitkin County. At a minimum, Subdivisions, SPAS or PUDs that create more than one lot, new Planned Unit Developments, and new Specially Planned Areas, are subject to this notice requirement. Rezoning or text amendment. Whenever the official zoning district map is in any way to be changed or amended incidental to or as part of a general revision of this Title, or whenever the text of this Title is to be amended, whether such revision be made by repeal of this Title and enactment of a new land use regulation, or otherwise, the requirement of an accurate survey map or other sufficient legal description of, and the notice to and listing of•names and addresses of owners of real property in the area of the proposed change shall be waived. However, the proposed zoning snap shall be available for public inspection in the planning agency during all business hours for fifteen (15) days prior to the public hearing on such amendments. Signature The foregoing""Affidavit,of Notice" was acknowledged before me this 2-7,day o f 1 , 20tS7 by 2�n� vC_0-1 �--� PUBLIC NOTICE RE:110 E.BLEEKER STREET- -- MAJOR DEVELOPMENT,DEMOLITION ANDL VARIANCES WITNESS MY HAND AND OFFICIAL SEAL NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that a public hearing will be held on Wednesday,February 11,2015,at a meeting to begin at 5:00 p.m.before the Aspen My COmm15SlOn eXplres. Historic Preservation Commission,in Council Chambers,City Hall,130 S.Galena St.,Aspen to consider an application submitted by Bleak House LLC,0133 Prospector Lane,Suite 4102B,Aspen, CO 81611,affecting the property at 110 E.Bleeker {- Street,Lots L and M,Block 65,City and Townsite ` of Aspen,Colorado,Parcel I0#2735-124-37-006. The applicant is requesting approval to demolish Notary Public ... an existing garage and construct a new addition behind the Victorian home,which will be restored. Setback,floor area and design variances will be '�`""•" M reviewed. The requested development approvals -(�'`'y^� ED PATTER,.ON associated with this application may be modified by .(V+t y �/ r+ the approving body. For further information,con- ��T PUBU`i tact Amy Simon at the City of Aspen Community @F �,w,ORDO Development Department,130 S.Galena St.,As- -" N F7Y"'{,�'VL, pen, .co (970)429-2758,amy.aimon,cityo- ATTACHMENTS AS APPLICABLE: faspen.com. 11 r� M %016 ,.9[WIII1sPembe� — °UBLICATION ��^ `Chair,Aspen Historic Preservation Commission �• r,.F,.o�.ex%,�. Published in the Aspen Times on January 22.2015(OF THE POSTED NOTICE (SIGN) (10882304) OWNERS AND GOVERNMENTAL AGENCIES NOTICED BY MAIL • APPLICANT CERTIFICATION OF MINERAL ESTAE OWNERS NOTICE AS REQUIRED BY C.R.S. §24-65.5-103.3 JAN 2 7 2015 AFFIDAVIT OF PUBLIC NOTICE r717'Y OF ASPEN�-n� ,P1 qpMEN's REQUIRED BY SECTION 26.304.060 (E),ASPEN LAND USE CODE ADDRESS OF PROPERTY: E IBIT aoa N. mena2�n . lob a rT9P ftekW ,Aspen, CO SCHEDULED PUBLIC HEARING DATE: 'Fe-11011 , 20_L!�_ STATE OF COLORADO ss. County of Pitkin ) I, L&Y'NX0,Vy" (name, please print) being or representing an Applicant to the City of Aspen, Colorado, hereby personally certify that I have complied with the public notice requirements of Section 26.304.060 (E) of the Aspen Land Use Code in the following manner: Publication of notice: By the publication in the legal notice section of an official paper or a paper of general circulation in the City of Aspen at least fifteen (15) days prior to the public hearing. A copy of the publication is attached hereto. /Posting Posting of notice: By posting of notice, which form was obtained from the Community Development Department, which was made of suitable, waterproof materials, which was not less than twenty-two (22) inches wide and twenty-six (26) inches high, and which was composed of letters not less than one inch in height. Sajnotice was posted at least fifteen (15) days prior to the public hearing on the •23 day of Torr\�Jo.r , 20_1�, to and including the date and time of the public hearing. A photograph of the posted notice (sign) is attached hereto. IMailing of notice. By the mailing of a notice obtained from the Community Development Department, which contains the information described in Section 26.304.060(E)(2) of the Aspen Land Use Code. At least fifteen (15) days prior to the public hearing, notice was hand delivered or mailed by first class postage prepaid U.S. mail to all owners of property within three hundred (300) feet of the property subject to the development application. The names and addresses of property owners shall be those on the current tax records of Pitkin County as they appeared no more than sixty (60) days prior to the date of the public hearing. A copy of the owners and governmental agencies so noticed is attached hereto. r1/a Neighborhood Outreach: Applicant attests that neighborhood outreach, summarized and attached, was conducted prior to the first public hearing as required in Section 26.304.035, Neighborhood Outreach. A copy of the neighborhood outreach summary, including the method of public notification and a copy of any documentation that was presented to the public is attached hereto. (continued on next page) n/a Mineral Estate Owner Notice. By the certified mailing of notice, return receipt requested, to affected mineral estate owners by at least thirty (30) days prior to the date scheduled for the initial public hearing on the application of development. The names and addresses of mineral estate owners shall be those on the current tax records of Pitkin County. At a minimum, Subdivisions, PDs that create more than one lot, and new Planned Developments are subject to this notice requirement. Rezoning or text amendment. Whenever the official zoning district map is in any way to be changed or amended incidental to or as part of a general revision of this Title, or whenever the text of this Title is to be amended, whether such revision be made by repeal of this Title and enactment of a new land use regulation, or otherwise, the requirement of an accurate survey map or other sufficient legal description of, and the notice to and listing of names and addresses of owners of real property in the area of the proposed change shall be waived. However, the proposed zoning map shall be available for public inspection in the planning agency during all business hours for fifteen (15) days prior to the public hearing on such amendments. Signature sti The foregoing "Affidavit of Notice"was acknowledged before me thiv�day of Je,C20 I� , by (l!� �,( [G�.Y1'1 �i� u NJ WITNESS MY HAND AND OFFICIAL SEAL PRISCILLA PROHL COOPER NOTARY PUBLIC My commission expires: B r�'� '� Z-/ZU/ STATE OF COLORADO 1 NOTARY ID#2012.4063186 r My Commission Expires October 2.2016 p Notary Public ATTACHMENTS AS APPLICABLE: • COPYOFTHEPUBLICATION • PHOTOGRAPH OF THE POSTED NOTICE(SIGN) • LIST OF THE OWNERS AND GOVERNMENTAL AGENCIES NOTICED BY MAIL • APPLICANT CERTIFICATION OF MINERAL ESTAE OWNERS NOTICE AS REQUIRED BY C.R.S. §24-65.5-103.3 PUBLIC NOTICE RE: LOT 2,202 N. MONARCH STREET SUBDIVISION-FINAL DESIGN REVIEW NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that a public hearing will be held on Wednesday, February 11, 2015, at a meeting to begin at 5:00 p.m. before the Aspen Historic Preservation Commission, in Council Chambers, City Hall, 130 S. Galena St., Aspen to consider an application submitted by Garrett Gulch Equity Venture, LLC, 2950 E. Broad Street, Columbus, OH, 43209, affecting their vacant lot, described as Lot 2, 202 N. Monarch Street Subdivision, City and Townsite of Aspen, Colorado, Parcel ID#2737-073-17-031. The applicant is requesting Final design approval for anew duplex. The requested development approvals associated with this application may be modified by the approving body. For further information, contact Amy Simon at the City of Aspen Community Development Department, 130 S. Galena St., Aspen, CO, (970) 429-2758, amy.simon@cityofaspen.com. s/Willis Pember Chair,Aspen Historic Preservation Commission Published in the Aspen Times on January 22, 2015 City of Aspen Account IMG_1161.JPG PUBLIC NOTI Date: Wed.. b. 11, 2015 Time: 5:oo P. Place: 130 Tena St... City Hall-e-0ai Chambers Purpose: HPC.will consider4n application_by !Parrett Gulch Equity Venture LLC. 2950 E. Broad Striet. Columbus, OH,43209.affeg this.Qroperty. iApplicant requests Final design approval for a rvw duplex. i Contact Aspen nnin�Dt_at 97Q429-2758. https:Hmail.google.com/ /scs/mail-static%fjs/k=gmaiI.main.en.eyIEuEyBJ3U.Q/m=m_i,t,it/am=nhEG7v_WHBQ4w136pO7ff7-7pNjZ5_X nQkg2QmA_5v9P4D... 1/1 225'NORTH MILL ST LLC 232 BLEEKER LLC 232 EAST MAIN STREET LLC 1530 BROADWAY 4TH FL 2385 NW EXECUTIVE CENTER DR#370 2001 N HALSTED#304 NEW YORK, NY 10036 BOCA RATON, FL 33431 CHICAGO, IL 60614 310 EAST MAIN STREET VENTURES LLC AMATO JOSEPH A ASPEN COMMUNITY UNITED METHODIST.. 540 W MADISON ST#2500 PO BOX 503 CHURCH CHICAGO, IL 60661 HIGHLAND MILLS, NY 10930 200 E BLEEKER ST ASPEN, CO 81611 BANK MIDWEST N A BERKO GINA BLEEKER MILL DEVELOPMENT LLC 1111 MAIN ST#2800 292 GLEN EAGLES DR 345 PARK AVE 33RD FL KANSAS CITY, MO 64105 ASPEN, CO 81611 NEW YORK, NY 10154 CARLS REAL ESTATE LLC CHALAL JOSEPH B CITY OF ASPEN PO BOX 1365 1005 BROOKS LN 130 S GALENA ST ASPEN, CO 81612 DELRAY BEACH, FL 334836507 ASPEN, CO 81611 CJB REALTY INVESTORS LLC COMMUNITY BANKS OF COLORADO ELM 223 LLC 6544 WENONGA CIR 1111 MAIN ST#2800 PO BOX 360 MISSION HILLS, KS 66208 KANSAS CITY, MO 641052154 ASPEN, CO 81612 FIRST 415 RIO GRANDE PLACE TRST FLEISHER DAVID M GARRETT GULCH EQUITY VENTURE LLC SECOND 415 RIO GRANDE PLACE TRST 292 GLEN EAGLES DR 2950 E BROAD ST PO BOX 8982 ASPEN, CO 81611 COLUMBUS, OH 43209 ASPEN, CO 81612 GETTMAN ROSA H TRUST HAYES MARY E&JAMES L FAM LP LLLP HODES ALAN & DEBORAH 325 S FOREST 209 E BLEEKER ST 114 N ASPEN ST. DENVER, CO 80246 ASPEN, CO 81611 ASPEN, CO 81611 HODGSON PHILIP R 50% JEROME PROPERTY LLC KRIBS KAREN REV LIV TRUST 212 N MONARCH ST 540 W MADISON ST PO BOX 9994 ASPEN, CO 81611 CHICAGO, IL 60661 ASPEN, CO 81612 LIGHT HOLDINGS LLLP MADDEN WALTER ROSS 42.5% MONARCH HOLDINGS LLC 801 BASELINE RD 218 N MONARCH ST 458 WALLS WY BOULDER, CO 80302 ASPEN, CO 81611 OSPREY, FL 34229 MYRIN CUTHBERT L JR 57.5% NEWLON LLC PEARCE FAMILY TRUST PO BOX 12365 C/O DANFORTH 216 E MAIN ST ASPEN, CO 81612 PO BOX 1863 ASPEN, CO 81611 ASPEN, CO 81612 PITKIN COUNTY PUPPY SMITH LLC RANDALL MIDDLETON/HALLAM LP 530 E MAIN ST#302 602 E COOPER#202 FIVE POST OAK PARK#2580 ASPEN, CO 81611 ASPEN, CO 81611 4400 POST OAK PKWY HOUSTON,TX 77027 RAYTON RENEE ROCKHILL BRITTANIE SEGUIN WILLIAM L& MARILYN A PO BOX 12104 PO BOX 10261 PO BOX 4274 ASPEN, CO 81612 ASPEN, CO 81612 ASPEN, CO 816124274 SEMRAU FAMILY LLC WELLS FARGO BANK WHITMAN RANDALL A 300 S SPRING ST#203 C/O THOMSON PROPERTY TAX 4845 HAMMOCK LAKE DR ASPEN, CO 816112806 SERVICES CORAL GABLES, FL 33156 PO BOX 2609 CARLSBAD, CA 92018 AFFIDAVIT OF PUBLIC NOTICE REQUIRED BY SECTION 26.304.060 (E), ASPEN LAND USE CODE ADDRESS OF PROPERTY: 2,0 2 N . e (- , Aspen, CO SCHEDULED PUBLIC HEARING DATE: J�t000rrm 9201 STATE,OF COLORADO ) ss. County of Pitkin ) Scc� (name, please print) being or representing an Applicant to the City of Aspen, Colorado, hereby personally certify that I have complied with the public notice requirements of Section 26.304.060 (E) of the Aspen Land Use Code in the following manner: Publication of notice: By the publication in the legal notice section of an official paper or a paper of general circulation in the City of Aspen at least fifteen (15) days prior to the public hearing. A copy of the publication is attached hereto. Posting of notice' By posting of notice, which form was obtained from the Community Development Department, which was made of suitable, waterproof materials, which was not less than twenty-two (22) inches wide and twenty-six (26) inches high, and which was composed of letters not less than one inch in height. Said notice was posted at least fifteen(15) days prior to the public hearing on the day of , 20 , to and including the date and time of the public hearing. A photograph of the posted notice (sign) is attached hereto. Mailing of notice. By the mailing of a notice obtained from the Community Development Department, which contains the information described in Section 26.304.060(E)(2) of the Aspen Land Use Code. At least fifteen (15) days prior to the public hearing, notice was hand delivered or mailed by first class postage prepad`U`S";mail to all owners of property within three hundred (300) feet of the subJ p to the development app` ' ertect ment a lication. The names and addresses of x9�al�p, .p, .",Y C`4`ri 30;�CpropertyYowners shall be those on the current tax records of Pitkin County as they at�� �� 'appeared no�more than sixty (60) days prior to the date of the public hearing. A ``Y copy"of the°owiiers and governmental agencies so noticed is attached hereto. Neighborhood Outreach: Applicant attests that neighborhood outreach, summarized and attached, was conducted prior to the first public hearing as required in Section 26.304.0')5, , Neighborhood Outreach. A copy of the neighborhood outreach summary, including the method of public notification and a copy of any documentation that was presented to the public-is attached hereto. (continued 077 nett page) Mineral Estate Owner Notice. By the certified mailing of notice, return receipt requested, to affected mineral estate owners by at least thirty (30) days prior to the date scheduled for the initial public hearing on the application of development. The naives and addresses of mineral estate owners shall be those on the current tax records of Pitkin County. At a minimum, Subdivisions, SPAS or PUDs that create more than one lot, new Planned Unit Developments, and new Specially Planned Areas, are subject to this notice requirement. Rezoning or text aniendnient. Whenever the official zoning district map is in any way to be changed or amended incidental to or as part of a general revision of this Title, or whenever the text of this Title is to be amended, whether such revision be made by repeal of this Title and enactment of a new land use regulation, or otherwise, the requirement of an accurate survey map or other sufficient legal description of, and the notice to and listing of names and addresses of owners of real property in the area of the proposed change shall be waived. However, the proposed zoning map shall be available for public inspection in the planning agency during all business hours for fifteen (15) days prior to the public hearing on such amendments. Signature The foregoing "Affidavit of Notice" was acknowledged before me this 2Z day of s n , 20LS--,by 2kv�e.Qac -� PUBLIC NOTICE RE:LOT 2,202 N.MONARCH STREET' SUBDIVISION-FINAL DESIGN REVIEW NOTICE Is HEREBY GIVEN that a public hearing WITNESS MY HAND AND OFFICIAL SEAL will be held on Wednesday,February 11,2015,at a meeting to begin at 5:00 p.m.before the Aspen Historic Preservation Commission,in Council Chambers,City Hall,130 S:Galena St.,Aspen to My commission expires: consider an application submitted by Garrett Gulch Equity Venture,LLC,2950 E.Broad Street,Co- lumbus,OH,43209,affecting their vacant lot,de- _ scribed as Lot 2,202nsi N.Monarch Street ,Parcel Sion,City and Townsite of Aspen,Colorado,Parcel ID#2737-073-17-031. The applicant is requesting Final design approval for a new duplex. The re- Notary Public quested development approvals associated with - this application may be modified by the approving body. For further information,contact Amy Simon KAREN REED PATTERSON at the City of Aspen Community Development De- partment,130 S.Galena St.,Aspen,CO,(970) - NOTARY PUBLIC 429.2758,amy.simonOcityofaspen.com. STATE OF COLORADO s/Willls Pember NOTARY ID#19964002767 Chair,Aspen Historic Preservation Commission Published in the Aspen Times on January 22,2015 1 ATTACHMENTS AS APPLICABLE: My Commission Expires February 16,2016 (10882326) wrr yrrHEPUBLICATION • PHOTOGRAPH OF THE POSTED NOTICE (SIGN) • LIST OF THE OWNERS AND GOVERNMENTAL AGENCIES NOTICED BY MAIL • APPLICANT CERTIFICATION OF MINERAL ESTAE OWNERS NOTICE AS REQUIRED BY C.R.S §24-65.5-103.3 �001 Zo AFFIDAVIT OF PUBLIC NOTICE REQUIRED BY SECTION 26.304.060 (E),ASPEN LAND USE COZu C:D ADDRESS OF PROPERTY:G ,Aspen,CO SCHEDULED PUBLIC HEARING DATE: b 11 20j5 STATE OF COLORADO ) ) ss. County of Pitkin ) I, JAI A%J&A4W D (name,please print) being or representimg'an Applicant to the City of Aspen, Colorado, hereby personally certify that I have complied with the public notice requirements of Section 26.304.060 (E) of the Aspen Land Use Code in the following manner: Publication of notice: By the publication in the legal notice section of an official paper or a paper of general circulation in the City of Aspen at least fifteen (15) days prior to the public hearing. A copy of the publication is attached hereto. 4— Posting of notice: By posting of notice, which form was obtained from the Community Development Department, which was made of suitable, waterproof materials, which was not less than twenty-two (22) inches wide and twenty-six (26) inches high, and which was composed of letters not less than one inch in height. Said notice was posted at least fifteen (15)days prior to the public hearing on th�.9_0 day of , 20_1S to and including the date and time of the public hearing. A photogra h of the posted notice (sign) is attached hereto. 4 Mailing of notice. By the mailing of a notice obtained from the Community Development Department, which contains the information described in Section 26.304.060(E)(2) of the Aspen Land Use Code. At least fifteen (15) days prior to the public hearing, notice was hand delivered or mailed by first class postage prepaid U.S. mail to all owners of property within three hundred (300) feet of the property subject to the development application. The names and addresses of property owners shall be those on the current tax records of Pitkin County as they appeared no more than sixty (60) days prior to the date of the public hearing. A copy of the owners and governmental agencies so noticed is attached hereto. Neighborhood Outreach: Applicant attests that neighborhood outreach, summarized and attached, was conducted prior to the first public hearing as required in Section 26.304.035, Neighborhood Outreach. A copy of the neighborhood outreach summary, including the method of public notification and a copy of any documentation that was presented to the public is attached hereto. s (continued on next page) FEB ) 2 2015 CAI FY Oc_ A6REN �FvF.LOPMEN i Mineral Estate Owner Notice. By the certified mailing of notice, return receipt requested, to affected mineral estate owners by at least thirty (30) days prior to the date scheduled for the initial public hearing on the application of development. The names and addresses of mineral estate owners shall be those on the current tax records of Pitkin County. At a minimum, Subdivisions, SPAs or PUDs that create more than one lot, new Planned Unit Developments, and new Specially Planned Areas, are subject to this notice requirement. Rezoning or text amendment. Whenever the official zoning-district map is in any way to be changed or amended incidental to or as part of a general revision of this Title, or whenever the text of this Title is to be amended, whether such revision be made by repeal of this Title and enactment of a new land use regulation, or otherwise, the requirement of an accurate survey map or other sufficient legal description of, and the notice to and listing of names and addresses of owners of real property in the area of the proposed change shall be waived. However, the proposed zoning map shall be available for public inspection in the planning agency during all business hours for fifteen (15) days prior to the public hearing on such amendments. Sign ture The foregoing"Affidavit of Notice"was acknowledged before me this E day of 201 ,byV'rici ;ice, Eo'ctt WITNESS MY HAND AND OFFICIAL SEAL KRISTIN PRIDE NOTARY PUBLIC My c mmission ex ires-_ .�$ STATE OF COLORADO NOTARY ID#20064029379 My Commission Expires July 30,2018 a Pub is ATTACHMENTS AS APPLICABLE: • COPY OF THE PUBLICATION • PHOTOGRAPH,OF THE POSTED NOTICE(SIGN) • LIST OF THE OWNERS AND GOVERNMENTAL AGENCIES NOTICED BYAL41L • APPLICANT CERTIFICATION OF MINERAL ESTAE OWNERS NOTICE AS REQUIRED BY C.R.S. §24-65.5-103.3 � �� � - 4 y IL--, _ C '`Y0a AS PE' L ! i J, 10� 1-.1, AL ✓ LA RIC • w w •'T r f L r! ®Film 'fill 1 y _ -741 71 Ifni r i PUBLIC NOTICE RE: 232 EAST BLEEKER- FINAL DESIGN REVIEW NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that a public hearing will be held on Wednesday, February 11, 2015, at a meeting to begin at 5:00 p.m. before the Aspen Historic Preservation Commission, in Council Chambers, City Hall, 130 S. Galena St., Aspen. HPC will consider an application submitted by 232 Bleeker LLC, c/o David Willens, 2385 NW Executive Center Drive, Suite 440, Boca Raton, FL 33431, affecting the property located at 232 E. Bleeker Street, Lots R and S, Block 72, City and Townsite of Aspen, Colorado, Parcel ID# 2737-073-16-006. The applicant is requesting Final design approval. The requested development approvals associated with this application may be modified by the approving body. For further information, contact Amy Simon at the City of Aspen Community Development Department, 130 S: Galena St., Aspen, CO, (970) 429-2758, amy.simon@cityofaspen.com. s/Willis Pember Chair,Aspen Historic Preservation Commission Published in the Aspen Times on January 22, 2015 City of Aspen Account 202 ASPEN LLC 225 NORTH MILL ST LLC 310 EAST MAIN STREET VENTURES LLC 2950 E BROAD ST 2ND FL 1530 BROADWAY 4TH FL 540 W MADISON ST#2500 COLUMBUS, OH 43209 NEW YORK, NY 10036 CHICAGO, IL 60661 4 TOOLBOX LLC ALPINE PETROLEUM LLC AMATO JOSEPH A 208 E MAIN ST 435 E MAIN ST PO BOX 503 ASPEN, CO 81611 ASPEN,CO 81611 HIGHLAND MILLS, NY 10930 ASPEN COMMUNITY UNITED METHODIST ASPEN CORNER OFFICE LLC 20% BERKO GINA CHURCH 604 WEST MAIN 292 GLEN EAGLES DR 200 E BLEEKER ST ASPEN, CO 81611 ASPEN,CO 81611 ASPEN, CO 81611 BLEEKER MILL DEVELOPMENT LLC CARLS REAL ESTATE LLC CHALAL JOSEPH B 345 PARK AVE 33RD FL PO BOX 1365 1005 BROOKS LN NEW YORK, NY 10154 ASPEN,CO 81612 DELRAY BEACH, FL 334836507 CITY OF ASPEN CJB REALTY INVESTORS LLC ELM 223 LLC 130 S GALENA ST 6544 WENONGA CIR 1230 SNOWBUNNY LN ASPEN, CO 81611 MISSION HILLS, KS 66208 ASPEN, CO 81611 FLEISHER DAVID M GARRETT GULCH EQUITY VENTURE LLC GETTMAN ROSA H TRUST BERKO GINA 2950 E BROAD ST 325 S FOREST 292 GLEN EAGLE COLUMBUS,OH 43209 DENVER, CO 80246 ASPEN,CO 81611 HAY ES MARY E&JAMES L FAM LP LLLP HODES ALAN&DEBORAH HODGSON PATRICIA H FAMILY TRUST 209 E BLEEKER ST 114 N ASPEN ST. 50% ASPEN,CO 81611 ASPEN, CO 81611 212 N MONARCH ST ASPEN, CO 81611 HODGSON PHILIP R 50% JEROME PROPERTY LLC KRIBS KAREN REV LIV TRUST 212 N MONARCH ST 540 W MADISON ST PO BOX 9994 ASPEN, CO 81611 CHICAGO, IL 60661 ASPEN,CO 81612 LIGHT HOLDINGS LLLP MADDEN WALTER ROSS 42.5% MONARCH HOLDINGS LLC 801 BASELINE RD 218 N MONARCH ST 458 WALLS WY BOULDER,CO 80302 ASPEN, CO 81611 OSPREY, FL 34229 MOUNTAIN STATE PROPERTIES LLC MYRIN CUTHBERT L JR 57.5% PEARCE FAMILY TRUST 715 10TH ST SOUTH PO BOX 12365 216 E MAIN ST NAPLES, FL 34102 ASPEN, CO 81612 ASPEN, CO 81611 PEGOLOTTI DELLA PENN PAUL E&SUSAN W PUPPY SMITH LLC ASPEN HOME CONSIGNMENT 3830 E 79TH ST 602 E COOPER#202 202 E MAIN INDIANAPOLIS, IN 46260-3457 ASPEN, CO 81611 ASPEN,CO 81611 RANDALL MIDDLETON/HALLAM LP ROCKING LAZY J PROPERTIES LLC SEGUIN WILLIAM L&MARILYN A FIVE POST OAK PARK#2580 202 E MAIN ST PO BOX 4274 4400 POST OAK PKWY ASPEN, CO 81611 ASPEN, CO 816124274 HOUSTON,TX 77027 SEMRAU FAMILY LLC WATERS DANIEL E WHEELER SQUARE ASSOCIATES 80% 300 S SPRING ST#203 C/O BOSTOCK VICTORIA C 4049 PENNSYLVANIA AVE#400 ASPEN,CO 816112806 8 COPPER BEECH RD KANSAS CITY, MO 64111 GREENWICH, CT 068304034 WHITMAN RANDALL A 4845 HAMMOCK LAKE DR CORAL GABLES, FL 33156 AFFIDAVIT OF PUBLIC NOTICE REQUIRED BY SECTION 26.304.060 (E), ASPEN LAND USE CODE ADDRESS OF PROPERTY: 232. 45F Aspen, CO SCHEDULED PUBLIC HEARING DATE: we,d fico ll 5:Ooy,,,,, , 2005 STATE OF COLORADO ) ss. County of Pitkin ) I, .�o, �JCU.(' (name, please print) being or representing an Applican the City of Aspen, Colorado, hereby personally certify that I have complied with the public notice requirements of Section 26.304.060 (E) of the Aspen Land Use Code in the following manner: y/ Publication of notice: By the publication in the legal notice section of an official paper or a paper of general circulation in the City of Aspen at least fifteen (15) days prior to the public hearing. A copy of the publication is attached hereto. Posting of notice: By posting of notice, which form was obtained from the Community Development Department, which was made of suitable, waterproof materials, which was not less than twenty-two (22)•inches wide and twenty-six (26) inches high, and which was composed of letters not less than one inch in height. Said notice was posted at least fifteen (15) days prior to the public hearing on the day of , 20_, to and including the date and time of the public hearing. A photograph of the posted notice (sign) is attached hereto. Mailing of notice. By the mailing of a notice obtained from the Community Development Department, which contains the infonnation described in Section 26.304.060(E)(2) of the Aspen Land Use Code. At least fifteen (15) days prior to the public hearing, notice was hand delivered or mailed by first class postage _,_prepaid.U:S.,mail to all owners of property within three hundred (300) feet of the €Jproperty sixbject to the development application. The names and addresses of 'C y-property owners shall be those on the current tax records of Pitkin County as they appeared'no more than sixty (60) days prior to the date of the public hearing. A i `b � ers and a � oftlze.owhboy ernmen tal agencies so noticed is attached hereto. Neighborhood Outreach:. Applicant attests that neighborhood outreach, sununanzed and attached, was conducted prior to the first public hearing as required in Section 26.304.035, Neighborhood Outreach. A copy of the neighborhood outreach su7717na7y, including the method of public notification and a copy of arty documentation that was presented to the public is attached hereto. (continued 077 next page) Miiaeral Estate.Owner Notice. By the certified mailing of notice, return receipt requested, to affected mineral estate owners by at least thirty (30) days prior to the date scheduled for the initial public hearing on the application of development. The names and addresses of mineral estate owners shall be those on the current tax records of Pitkin County. At a minimum, Subdivisions, SPAs or PUDs that create more than one lot, new Planned Unit Developments, and new Specially Planned Areas, are subject to this notice requirement. Rezoning or teat amendment. Whenever the official zoning district map is in any way to be changed or amended incidental to or as part of a general revision of this Title, or whenever the text of this Title is to be amended, whether such revision be made by repeal of this Title and enactment of a new land use regulation, or otherwise, the requirement of an accurate survey map or other sufficient legal description of, and the notice to and listing of names and addresses of owners of real property in the area of the proposed change shall be waived. However, the proposed zoning snap shall be available for public inspection in the planning agency during all business hours for fifteen (15) days prior to the public hearing on such amendments. Signa re The foregoing "Affidavit of Notice" was acknowledged before me this 2 Z day Of JCL n � 1 2015-,byAloe,reL,:7j PUBLIC NOTICE RE:232 EAST BLEEKER- FINALDESIGNRE_VIEW WITNESS W HAND AND OFFICIAL SEAL NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that a public hearing will be held on Wednesday,February 11,2015,at a meeting to begin at 5:00 p.m.before the Aspeni t Historic Preservation Commission,in CouncilMy commission expires: Chambers,City Hall,130 S.Galena St.,Aspen. HPC will consider an application submitted by 232 . Bleaker LLC,c/o David Willens, cat NW 232 E. P- a five Center Drive,Suite 440,Boca Raton,FL 33431,affecting the property located at 232 E. O A T�/►� `� 1 Bleeker Street,Lots R and S,Block 72,City and Townsite of Aspen, Colorado, Parcel ID# Notary Not Public 2737-073-16-006. The applicant is requesting Fi- nal design approval. The requested development LKAREN approvals associated with this applicationmay bemodified o the approving body. For further spenED PATTERSON mation,contact Amy Simon at the City of AspenCommunity Development Department,130 S.Ga- ARY PUBIC amy.lenSt., Aspen, CO, (s7o) a2s-275a, - OF COLORADO amysimon cityofaspencom.s/Wa�is FemberD#19964002767 Chair,Aspen Historic Preservation Commission ATTACHMENTS AS APPLICABLE: xpires February 15,2018 Published in the Aspen Times on January 22,2015 .PUBLICATION (10882314) - • 07'0vltarH OF THE POSTED NOTICE (SIGN) • LIST OF THE OWNERS AND GOVERNMENTAL AGENCIES NOTICED BY MAIL • APPLICANT CERTIFICATION OF MINERAL ESTAE OWNERS NOTICE AS REQUIRED BY C.R.S. §24-65.5-103.3