The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutLand Use Case.601 E Hyman Ave.0023.2013.ASLU0023.2013.ASLU 601 E. HYMAN AVE 273718225801 FINAL COMAA DESIGN REVIEW ,...1 - -1--76 ---7.i' O k-/16 1 /9 (>Je.4 1 - . 1 ,- L .. THIS CITY OF ASPEN City of Aspen Community Development Department CASE NUMBER 0023.2013.ASLU PARCEL ID NUMBERS 2737 18 225 801 PROJECTS ADDRESS 601 E HYMAN AVE PLANNER SARA NADOLNEY CASE DESCRIPTION FINAL COMMERICAL DESIGN REVIEW REPRESENTATIVE STAN CLAUSEN DATE OF FINAL ACTION 06.24.14 CLOSED BY ANGELA SCOREY ON: 3.19.15 bixa 0.- 1, AFFIDAVIT OF PUBLIC NOTICE REQUIRED BY SECTION 26.304.070 AND CHAPTER 26.306 ASPEN LAND USE CODE ADDRESS OF PROPERTY: D1(D , Aspen, CO i STATE OF COLORADO ) ) SS. County of Pitkin ) I, */\4-4 9\"-ren (name, please print) being or repiesenting an Applicant to the City of Aspen, Colorado, hereby personally certify that I have complied with the public notice requirements of Section 26.304.060 (IE) or Section 26.306.010 (E) of the Aspen Land Use Code in the following manner: L/ Publication of notice: By the publication in the legal notice section of an official paper or a paper of general circulation in the City of Aspen at least fourteen (14) days after final approval of a site specific development plan. A copy of the publication is attached hereto. Publication ofnonce: By the publication in the legal notice section o f an official Paper or a paper of general circulation in the City of Aspen no later than fifteen (15) days after an Interpretation has been rendered. A copy of the publication is attached hereto. alt Sc~i~-v-~ Signature The foregoing "Affidavit of Notice" was acknowledged before me this Â°28' day of,J"No , 2011 by -AvÂ¥~7<1/1 ~C~C--v- WITNESS MY HAND AND OFFICIAL SEAL PUBLIC NOTICE Of - My commission expires: '3-261-20(Lf DEVELOPMENT APPROVAL Notice is hereby given to the general public of the approval of a site specific development plan, and the creation of a vested properiy fight pursuant to the Land Use Code of the City of Aspen and Title 24, Artide 68. Colorado Revised Statutes. pertain- Notary Public 046 K i.,61613 I ing to the following described property: Victorian . ... ....to ~ Square. the North Half of Lots A, B & C, Block 100, ~ City of Aspen. Pitkin County, co. and more corn- 1 monvy known as 601 E. Hyman Ave., Aspen, Colo- r rado, 81611,by order of the Community DeveÂ¢op ment Director on June 24th, 2013. For further information contact Sara Nadolny, at the City of Aspen Commundy Deve?opment Dept. 130 S. Ga . * ./0 rena St, Aspen, Colorado (970) 429-2739. ATTACHMENTS: f UNDA M. i s/City of Aspen Publish in The Aspen Times Weekly on June 27, COPY OF THE PUBLICATION 1 M.ANNING i 2013.[93040501 C* ay W44.,1..'.22- My Commission El*es W19/2014 DEVELOPMENT ORDER ofthe City ofAspen Community Development Department This Development Order, hereinafter "Order", is hereby issued pursuant to Section 26.304.070, "Development Orders", and Section 26.308.010, "Vested Property Rights", of the City of Aspen Municipal Code. This Order allows development of a site specific development plan pursuant to the provisions of the land use approvals, described herein. The effective date of this Order shall also be the initiation date of a three-year vested property right. The vested property right shall expire on the day after the third anniversary of the effective date of this Order, unless a building permit is approved pursuant to Section 26.304.075, or unless an exemption, extension, reinstatement, or a revocation is issued by City Council pursuant to Section 26.308.010. After Expiration of vested property rights, this Order shall remain in full force and effect, excluding any growth management allotments granted pursuant to Section 26.470, but shall be subject to any amendments to the Land Use Code adopted since the effective date of this Order. This Development Order is associated with the property noted below for the site specific development plan as described below. Victorian Square LLC, 601 E. Hyman Ave, Aspen, CO 81611 Property Owner's Name, Mailing Address Victorian Square, North Half of Lots A, B & C, Block 100. City of Aspen, Pitkin Count>, Colorado; 601 E. Hyman Ave. Aspen, CO 81611 Legal Description and Street Address of Subject Property Victorian Square LLC received Commercial Design Review that will permit the construction of a three-story mixed-use building containing 7,317 sq. ft. of net leasable space, and 1,806 sq. ft. of free- market net livable space. The building measures at 36' at its highest roof point, with an elevator overrun of 38'. The site has been approved with 595 sq. ft. of public amenitY space, which is in the form of an enhanced/widened public walkway with street trees and additional landscaping. The proiect requires the mitigation of 4.90 Full-Time Equivalents (FTE's), which the Applicant will provide for in the form of Certificates of Affordable Housing Credit. Written Description of the Site Specific Plan and/or Attachment Describing Plan Approval by the City of Aspen Planning and Zoning Commission of Final Commercial Design Review via Resolution 14, Series 2013 on 6/18/2013. Land Use Approval(s) Received and Dates (Attach Final Ordinances or Resolutions) June 27,2013 Effective Date of Development Order (Same as date of publication of notice ofapproval.) June 28,2016 Expiration Date oj Development Order (The extension, reinstatement, exemption from expiration and revocation may be pursued in accordance with Section 26.308.010 ofthe City of Aspen Municipal Code.) Issued thig 24St daw of lune, 2013, by the City of Aspen Community Development Director. Chris Bendon, Community Development Director 1 MEMORANDUM TO: Planning and Zoning Commission FROM: Sara Nadolny, Planning Technician THRU: Chris Bendon, Community Development Director MEETING DATE: June 18, 2013 RE: 601 E. Hyman Ave - Final Commercial Design Review APPLICANT /OWNER: building located at 601 E. Hyman Avenue. The Victorian Square, LLC Applicant has previously received approvals for Conceptual Commercial Design and Growth REPRESENTATIVE: Management reviews, and has vacated the building's Stan Clauson, Stan Clauson Associates condo plat and covenants. and Sarah Broughton, Rowland & Broughton Architecture and Urban STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Design The Applicant has responded to direction from Staff and the Commission throughout the design process, and LOCATION: presented an attractive and appropriate design for the 601 E. Hyman Street, City and proposed building. Staff is not recommending any Townsite of Aspen design changes to this application. Staff recommends that the Planning and Zoning Commission approve the CURRENT ZONING & USE minor expansion of commercial, lodge or mixed use The existing building is located in the development and Final Commercial Design Review, Commercial (C-1) zone district. The with conditions. site is currently used commercially. * V PROPOSED LAND USE: , The Applicant is proposing the demolition of the existing commercial building and its replacement with a :F'Â·Â·':, flâ€¢ WAI' 9 A mixed-use building. ly,r --1 -?Ef Iti - 0~* 1-- - E I~*r-Â·-1.21 3 4 Uil Ap:jl SUMMARY: Rr The Applicant requests Planning and f,0 - inn - 7 Zoning Commission approval of the ~ 6 ~ , 6 application for Final Commercial ~11% 4 ''i .' Design Review and minor expansion of commercial, lodge or mixed-use r development relating to the demolition and redevelopment o f the existing Figure A: Photo image of the subject property 1 b BACKGROUND: 601 E. Hyman Ave is a two-story commercial building, commonly known as the Garfield & Hecht office building. The Applicant proposes to demolish the two-story commercial building and replace it with a three-story mixed-use building, containing 7,317 square feet of commercial net leasable space, to be divided between the basement, first and second floors, and a 1,806 square foot free market third floor residential unit. . 444-1 le./ ./ - , 4. =4 - - 14 ~. Hyril,111 4, e~ ' 79.- , ~ , 2 44 + 8% . r Â· tb . f , h j~': A.fi -- 4. 4 . ,&90 ' ~hspen Art Museum site ~ , 1 - 41 *014% .., I i '4' : h 0 F 4 th:j' r 1 - - 51 ::~ ~ I Â·Â·Â·f e Â·M 'A.. 9 .,P , *. . . 6 4. 20. Â·.,43. â€¢,/, L 1 1 1 1* 3 - 4'â€¢84* -1 P , C ... 4 Figure B: Vicinity map LAND USE REQUEST AND REVIEW PROCEDURES: The applicant is requesting the following land use approvals from the Planning and Zoning Commission: â€¢ Final Commercial Design Review - Commercial Character Area pursuant to Land Use Code Chapter 26.412, Commercial Design Review. An application for Commercial Design Review requires the Planning and Zoning Commission, at a public hearing, to approve, approve with conditions or disapprove ofthe Commercial Design Review. â€¢ Minor expansion of a commercial. lodge or mixed-use development pursuant to Land Use Code Section 26.470.060.5, Growth Management Quota System, Administrative applications. An application for the expansion of commercial net leasable space for mixed-use buildings up to (250) square feet may be approved, approved with conditions or denied by the Community Development Director. Staff has chosen to combine this approval with Final Commercial Design Review before the Planning and Zoning Commission, as it relates to the project's final approvals. 2 Previous Approvals Conceptual Commercial Design Review was approved by the Planning and Zoning Commission through Resolution No. 19, Series of 2012. Growth Management Review was approved by the Planning and Zoning Commission through Resolution No. 22, Series of 2012, with a recommendation to Council supporting Subdivision Review in the same Resolution. The Applicant has since vacated the condominium plat (Reception No. 598931) and covenants (Reception No. 598932), thereby circumventing the step to City Council to complete the Subdivision review. STAFF COMMENTS 1. COMMERCIAL DESIGN REVIEW: This application requires review under the Commercial Design Standards as they apply to all commercial, lodging, and mixed-use development containing a commercial component within the City of Aspen. The property is located in the Commercial Character Area of the Commercial, Lodging and Historic District Design Objectives and Guidelines. This property is just outside of the Commercial Core Historic District. The design purpose within the Commercial Character Area is to create a vibrant, well-connected pedestrian system with attractive public spaces, and buildings that provide a well-defined street edge with height and variation appropriate for the pedestrian scale. This area is influenced by lodge development to the south, and is undergoing many changes with the development of the neighboring Muse and Aspen Art Museum buildings. These buildings tend to reflect a more modern design, while utilizing materials that are historic to the area, such as masonry and wood. Storefront design is typically less characteristic of this area. Emphasis is placed on providing for an improved pedestrian experience to draw pedestrians from the adj acent Commercial Core and increase the overall vitality of the area. Existing Conditions The site is on the corner of E. Hyman Ave and S. Hunter St, with a total lot size is 4,500 sf. A two-story commercial building currently exists on the property, with a gross square footage of 6,292 sf and a commercial net leasable area of 5,487 sf. The property hosts 595 sf (13%) of public amenity space. There is no on-site parking provided. Proposed Development The Applicant is proposing a three-story mixed-use building, with a total gross square footage of 9,304 sf. The proposed commercial net leasable area is 7,317sf, and the free-market net livable area is 1,806 sf. The property will host 562.50 sf (12.5%) of public amenity space, and no on- site parking will be provided. 3 The key design objectives of the Commercial Character Area are provided below. The Commission must find that the new development will meet these objectives. A. Strengthen the sense of relatedness with the Commercial Core Historic District. Stcdf Comment: Staff finds that the proposed building strengthens the sense of relatedness with the Commercial Core Historic District in its design, which incorporates mainly traditional materials, and yet has an understated modern motif. This building is a compliment to the traditional building practices found in the Commercial Core District, but with a bit more modern variety. The building has been designed with three distinct modules, which vary in their setback from the property line. These modules and materials serve to reduce the massing from a pedestrian perspective, and provide visual interest while strengthening the street edge. Ground floor retail is planned for the building, providing a draw for pedestrians to move from the Commercial Core to this area. Staff finds this criterion to be met. B. Maintain a retail orientation. Staff Comment: The Applicant is proposing ground floor retail in the building's design. The ground floor has also been design with floor to ceiling windows at the edge of the pedestrian walkway. This high degree of transparency will allow pedestrians to look into these commercial spaces, and will enhance the street vitality along E. Hyman Ave and S. Hunter St. Staff finds this criterion to be met. C. Promote creative, contemporary design. Staff Comment: The proposed building has been designed in such a way as to express a modern design with traditional aspects. The design has contemporary forms, and uses primarily traditional materials, such as wood, brick, glass and steel. The proposed laminate is a more contemporary material that complements the traditional materials used. The cantilevered second and third stories and the numerous green roofs add to a more contemporary feel of the design. The building will integrate well with the contemporary designs of the Aspen Art Museum at the opposite end of the block and the neighboring Muse building. The proposed building will be situated orthogonally on the site, complying with the traditional development patterns found throughout this character area. Staff finds this criterion to be met. D. Encourage a well-defined street wall. Stajf Comment: The Applicant has proposed an enhanced pedestrian walkway around the building, a design which was previously approved by the Planning and Zoning Commission, and serves as public amenity space for the proposed project. The building's ground level will directly abut this walkway, creating a strong edge to for both Hunter St and Hyman Ave. The building's modules help to add variety that is more unique than found in the Commercial Core Historic District. The street fagade is defined by the street trees that are proposed 4 between the pedestrian walkway and the roadway. Benches and landscaping are planned for the public amenity space. Staff finds this criterion to be met. E. Reflect the variety in building heights seen traditionally. Staff Comment: The proposed building is varied in height and designed with differing modules, with the highest module measuring at 35' and the lowest module measuring at 27'. The building's elevator tower reaches a height of 38'. The building has been designed to reflect the original lot width. The proposed building is slightly lower than its neighboring Muse building, and significantly lower than the Aspen Art Museum, therefore recognizing a range in the buildings found in the Commercial Area. Staff finds this criterion to be met. F. Accommodate outdoor public spaces while establishing a clear definition to the street edge. Staff Comment: The application includes two outdoor benches for public use, which are shielded from the outdoor elements by an overhead canopy. Because they are covered these benches do not contribute to the amount of approved public amenity space; however they do contribute to the success of the outdoor public space for this project. Public amenity space has been previously approved by the Planning and Zoning Commission in the form of a widened public walkway that is visually enhanced with decorative pavers. The outdoor public space is further enhanced by the installation of street trees that will buffer pedestrians from street traffic and off-street parking. The enhanced walkway will abut the building's ground floor, and will allow the pedestrian direct interaction with the windows of the first floor retail. Staff finds this criterion to be met. G. Promote variety in the street level experience. Staff Comment: The proposed building has been designed with a high degree of transparency at the first fioor level, which is intended to house retail stores. Architectural details include variation in materials used on each module of the building as well as the covered walkway along the Hyman facade which will allow pedestrians to walk or use the benches and remain protected from the elements. Enhanced landscaping in the form of street trees will add to the street level experience. Staff finds this criterion to be met. 2. GROWTH MANAGEMENT QUOTA SYSTEM (GMQS): Minor Expansion of a Commercial, Lodge or Mixed-use Development. The Applicant has made some minor changes from what was previously approved through the GMOS review to the floor area the commercial and residential aspects of the proposed development. Although the mix is proposed to remain the same, with basement, first and second fioors as commercial and a third floor free-market residential unit, the size of the use at each floor has changed. 5 Level Formerly Proposed Currently Proposed Basement 1,826 sf net leasable 1,816 sf net leasable First Floor 3,045 sf net leasable 2,497 sf net leasable Second Floor 2,394 sf net leasable 3,004 sf net leasable Third Floor 1,835 sf net livable 1,806 sf net livable Formerly 7,265 net leasable space was proposed. Currently 7,317 sf of net leasable space is proposed. This is a change in 52 sf. According to Section 26.470.060.5 Minor expansion of a commercial, lodge or mixed-use development of the Code, an expansion that involves less than 250 sf of new net leasable space may be approved, approved with conditions or denied by the Community Development Director. Staff has chosen to combine this with the Commercial Design Review discussed previously so that this change may be recorded in the attached Resolution. Staff has found the proposed increase to be allowed for in terms of available growth management allotments, and therefore recommends approval of this increase. The change to net livable square footage has no impact on the amount of growth management allotments the Applicant may receive, as one residence, regardless of size, needs one GMQS allotment. This was previously approved in Resolution 22, Series of 2012 (attached as Exhibit G), and does not need to be re-addressed. Previous approval required the Applicant to provide mitigation for 4.79 Full Time Equivalents (FTE'). With the addition of net leasable space, the Applicant will be required to provide mitigation for 4.90 FTE's. As previously approved, the Applicant continues to request approval to provide for mitigation in the form of the purchase of Certificates of Affordable Housing Credit. CITY DEPARTMENT REVIEW COMMENTS: 1. Engineering - The site design must meet the requirements of the Urban Runoff Management Plan. A compliant drainage plan must be submitted with the building permit application. All sidewalk, curb and gutter must meet the Engineering Standards as outlines in Title 21. A construction management plan must be submitted prior to building permit that addresses staging and encroachments. An excavation stabilization plan must be submitted prior to building permit. 2. Parks - Landscaping in the Right-of-Way (ROW) is subject to the requirements found in Chapter 21.20 of the Municipal Code. All plantings in the ROW shall be approved by the Parks and Engineering Depts. Improvements to the ROW shall include Silva Cell Technology and pavers placed within the planting zone (5' from the back of curb). These improvements should coordinate with the neighboring 625 E. Hyman Ave improvements to the extent possible. An approved tree permit is required prior to the removal of any 6 tree, or impact on any tree's drip line, and shall be approved prior to building permit. Parks shall approve the final landscape plan during the review of the tree removal permit based on the landscape estimates. RECOMMENDATION: Staff believes the proposed development meets all of the necessary criteria for development in the Commercial Character Area and Commercial (C- 1) zone district. Staff feels the presence of ground level retail combined with a high degree of transparency at the edge of the enhanced walkway will serve create a more vibrant pedestrian experience and bring interest to an area of the city that generally lacks the vitality of the adjacent downtown core. The building has been appropriately designed to act as an anchor for this block of Hyman Ave, and will maintain interest from the street level with its varied modules and materials. The proposed building is an appropriate and attractive addition to a block that is undergoing a complete makeover. The addition of 52 sf of net leasable space (requiring 52 net leasable growth management allotments) permits additional commercial space within the proposed development, maintains the required ratio of commercial to free-market square footage, and does not present an issue for available growth management allotments for this calendar year. Community Development Department Staff recommend that the Planning and Zoning Commission approve the Applicant's request for minor expansion of a commercial, lodge or mixed-use development, as well as Final Commercial Design Review, as proposed. RECOMMENDED MOTION: Planning and Zoning Commission is the final review board for this Final Commercial Design Review. If the Commission chooses to recommend approval for the request, they may use this motion "I move to make a recommendation to approve the request for Final Commercial Design Review and the Minor expansion of a commercial, lodge or mixed-use development for 601 E. Hyman Ave, with conditions as outlines in the Resolution." ATTACHMENTS: Exhibit A - Commercial Design Review Criteria Exhibit B - Final Review Design Guidelines -Key Objectives Exhibit C - Final Review Design Guidelines - Commercial Character Area Exhibit D - Updated GMQS Calculations Exhibit E - City Department Referrals Exhibit F - Application Exhibit G - Approved Resolutions Exhibit H - Vacation of Condo Declaration and Covenants 7 Exhibit A Review Criteria Commercial Design Review A. The proposed development meets the requirements of Section 26.412.060, Commercial design standards, or any deviation from the standards provides a more appealing pattern of development considering the context in which the development is proposed and the purpose of the particular standard. Unique site constraints can justify a deviation from the standards. Compliance with Section 26.412.070, Suggested design elements, is not required but may be used to justify a deviation from the standards. Staff Response: The proposed development has been found by Stajf to meet the requirements of Section 26.412.060 of the Commercial Design Standards, and no deviations from these standards are being sought by the Applicant. During the conceptual commercial design review process, the public amenity space was approved at 12.5% of the lot, rather than the 13% that currently exists on-site; however, that which is approved meets the standards for public amenity space as found in this chapter of the land use code. The Applicant has indicated intent to comply with the Suggested design elements in Section 26.412.070. Stafffinds this criterion to be met. B. For proposed development converting an existing structure to commercial use, the proposed development meets the requirements of Section 26.412.060, Commercial design standards, to the greatest extent practical. Changes to the fava(le of the building may be required to comply with this Section. Staff Response: The existing building is exclusively used for commercial use, and no conversion of uses is required. Stafffinds this criterion to be non-applicable. C. The application shall comply with the guidelines within the Commercial, Lodging and Historic District Objectives and Guidelines as determined by the appropriate Commission. The guidelines set forth design review criteria, standards and guidelines that are to be used in making determinations of appropriateness. The City shall determine when a proposal is in compliance with the criteria, standards and guidelines. Although these criteria, standards and guidelines are relatively comprehensive, there may be circumstances where alternative ways of meeting the intent of the policy objectives might be identified. In such a case, the City must determine that the intent of the guideline is still met, albeit through alternative means. Staff Response: Staff has determined that the application meets the standards of the Commercial, Lodging and Historic District Objectives and Guidelines for the Commercial Character Area. The standards are specifically discussed in Exhibit B, following. Sta#jinds this criterion to be met. 1 Exhibit B Final Review Design Guidelines Commercial Character Area Key Design Objectives Commercial Character Area Design Objectives: These are key design objectives for the Commercial Area. The City must find that any new work will help to meet them: 1. Strengthen the sense of relatedness with the Commercial Core Historic District. Strengthening the definition of the street edge in a manner similar to the Commercial Core is desired. At the same time, the Commercial Area is a place where more variety in design is encouraged. Imitating historic styles is not an objective, but re-establishing a sense of a stronger fundamental framework will enhance the urban qualities of this area and is a priority. Staff Finding: The proposed building strengthens the sense of relatedness with the Commercial Core Historic District in its design, which incorporates mainly traditional materials, and yet has an understated modern motif. The building has been designed with three distinct modules, which vary in their setback from the property line. These modules and materials serve to reduce the massing from a pedestrian perspective, and provide visual interest while strengthening the street edge. The first floor has a high degree of transparency, which also strengthens the building's relationship to pedestrians who will be able to see into the ground floor commercial uses. The proposed ground and second level commercial spaces will help draw interest and vitality to the area. Staff finds this criterion to be met. 2. Maintain a retail orientation. Greater retail presence should be achieved to ensure an enhanced street vitality and an enriched and more urban definition of the commercial street frontage. Staff Finding: The Applicant is proposing ground floor retail in the building's design. The ground floor has also been design with floor to ceiling windows at the edge of the pedestrian walkway. This high degree of transparency will allow pedestrians to look into these commercial spaces, and will enhance the street vitality along E. Hyman Ave and S. Hunter St. Staffjinds this criterion to be met. 3. Promote creative, contemporary design. Designs should seek creative new solutions that convey the community's continuing interest in exploring innovations. At the same time, the fundamental principles of traditional design must be respected. This means that each project should strike a balance in the design variables that are presented in the following pages. Staff Finding: The proposed building has been designed in such a way as to express a modern design with traditional aspects. The design follows natural forms, and uses primarily traditional materials, such as wood, brick, glass and steel. The proposed 2 laminate is a more contemporary material that complements the more traditional materials. The cantilevered second and third stories and the numerous green roofs add to a more contemporary feel of the design. The building will integrate well with the contemporary designs of the Aspen Art Museum at the opposite end of the block and the neighboring Muse building. The proposed building will be situated orthogonally on the site, complying with the traditional development patterns found throughout this character area. Staffjinds this criterion to be met. 4. Encourage a well-defined street wall. The intent is to more clearly establish a strongly defined street wall, but with some greater variety than in the Commercial Core Historic District since the historic building edge is not as defined. A stronger street fagade definition should be achieved while at the same time recognizing the value ofpublic dining and landscaped space. Staff Finding: The Applicant has proposed an enhanced pedestrian walkway around the building, a design which was previously approved by the Planning and Zo,ling Commission, and serves as public amenity space for the proposed project. The building's ground level will abut this walkway, and be made of transparent glass which will allow pedestrians a view into the commercial spaces within. The building's modules help to add variety that is more unique than found in the Commercial Core Historic District. The street fafade is defined by the street trees that are proposed between the pedestrian walkway and the roadway. Benches and landscaping are planned for the public amenity space. Staffjinds this criterion to be met. 5. Reflect the variety in building heights seen traditionally. It is important that a range and variation in building height and scale in the Commercial Area be recognized in future developments. Larger buildings should be varied in height and reflect original lot widths. Stajf Finding: The proposed building is varied in height and designed with diffrring modules, with the highest module measuring at 35' and the lowest module measuring at 27'. The building's elevator tower reaches a height of 38'. The building has been designed to reflect the original lot width. The proposed building is slightly lower than its neighboring Muse building, and significantly lower than the Aspen Art Museum, therefore recognizing a range in the buildings found in the Commercial Area. Staff finds this criterion to be met. 6. Accommodate outdoor public spaces while establishing a clear definition to the street edge. Providing space in association with individual buildings remains important, but should be balanced with much greater building street presence and corner definition. Staff Finding: The application includes two outdoor benches for public use, which are shielded from the outdoor elements by an overhead canopy. Because they are covered these benches do not contribute to the amount of approved public amenity space; however they do contribute to the success of the outdoor public space for this project. Public amenity space has been previously approved by the Planning and Zoning Commission in the form of a widened public walkway that is visually enhanced with decorative pavers. 3 The outdoor public space is further enhanced by the installation of street trees that will buffer pedestrians from street traffic and off-street parking. The enhanced walkway will abut the building's ground floor, and will allow the pedestrian direct interaction with the windows of the jirstfloor retail. Staff jinds this criterion to be met. 7. Promote variety in the street level experience. Display cases, architectural details and landscaping are among the design elements that should be used. Staff Finding: The proposed building has been designed with a high degree of transparency at the first floor level, which is intended to house retail stores. Architectural details include variation in materials used on each module of the building as weN as the covered walkway along the Hyman facade which will allow pedestrians to walk or use the benches and remain protected from the elements. Enhanced landscaping in the form of street trees will add to the street level experience. Staffjinds this criterion to be met. 4 Exhibit C Final Review Design Guidelines Commercial Character Area 1.29 A new building shall reflect the traditional lot width (30 ft) as expressed by two or more of the following: â€¢ Variation in height at internal lot lines â€¢ Variation in the plane of the front fÂ®ade â€¢ Street fagade composition â€¢ Variation in architectural detailing and materials to emphasize the building module Staff Response: The newly proposed building reflects the traditional lots widths throughout three distinct building modules. There is a variation in height between aN three modules as well as in plane of the front fafade. Variation between each module is further achieved with the use of distinct material, which provides visual distinction between each module. Staff finds this criterion to be met. 1.30 The detailed design of the building favade should reflect the traditional scale and rhythm of the block. This should be achieved using all o f the following â€¢ The fenestration grouping â€¢ The modeling o f the fagade â€¢ The design framework for the first floor storefront â€¢ Variation in architectural detail/or the palette of faÂ©ade materials Staff Response: The rectangular shape and grouping of windows found within the front faÂ¢ade of the largest module on the building complement those found within neighboring building, such as the adjacent Muse building. The jirst floor is primarily comprised of jloor to ceiling windows, providing transparency to the commercial areas within. The choice and color of the building's materials vary across each fat:ade, creating a sense of visual interest. Staffjinds this criterion to be met. 1.31 A building should reflect the architectural hierarchy and articulation inherent in the composition of the street fa~ade. The following should be addressed: â€¢ The design and definition of the traditionally tall first floor â€¢ The vertical proportions of the upper level fenestration pattern and ratio of solid wall to window area. Staff Response: The proposed building has been designed with a traditionally taller first jloor, which reaches 13', with the second and third floors reaching a lesser height of 11'. The first .floor has been designed primarily with jloor to ceiling glass, thereby increasing the transparency of the main floor. The upper floor fenestration is rectangular, thereby complimenting that found on the ground floor. The large cutaway on the face of the second 5 module found closest to the corner of Hunter St. and Hyman Ave. creates an interesting feature that also complements the remaining fenestration pattern. The jinish is more solid on the upper jloor, creating a sense of balance with the amount of#nestration found throughout the building. Stafffinds this criterion to be met. 1.32 A building should reflect the three-dimensional characteristics of the street fagade in the strength and depth of modeling, fenestration and architectural detail. Staff Response: The building has been proposed with three distinct modules, which have varied setbacks front the property line. This creates a sense of strength and depth in the building's modeling. The first floor is comprised primarily of floor to ceiling glass, with additional windows punched into the upper floor levels. This fenestration creates additional depth to the building's design. The building complements the three-dimensional characteristics of the street faÂ¢ade in fenestration, and adds to the strong street edge with a pedestrian-friendly atmosphere. Stafffinds this criterion to be met. 1.33 Any new building shall be designed to maintain a minimum of 9 feet from floor to ceiling on all floors. Staff Response: The ground floor ceiling measures at a height of 135 while the second and third floors measure at a height of 11'. Stafffinds this criterion to be met. 1.34 Maintain the distinction between the street level and upper floors. â€¢ The first floor should be the tallest floor to floor height in the building â€¢ The first floor o f the primary fagade should be predominantly transparent glass â€¢ Upper floors should be perceived as being more opaque than the street level. Upper story windows should have a vertical emphasis. â€¢ Highly reflective or darkly tinted glass is inappropriate â€¢ Express the traditional distinction in floor heights between the street levels and upper levels through detailing, materials and fenestration. The presence of a belt course is an important feature in this relationship. Staff Response: At a height of 13 feet, the first floor is the tallest floor of the building. Further distinction is made by the predominance of glass found at the front and western facades. Upper story windows have a vertical emphasis that is complementary to the shape of the fenestration found on the ground floor. The upper floor is composed of materials that are more solid than transparent. No highly reflective or darkly tinted glass is planned for this building. Traditional distinction in floor heights is expressed between the street and upper levels of the building through the change in materials, being primarily glass on the ground floor and laminate wood panels on the Hyman St fa<ade, and a transition between brick and glass of varying height on the Hunter St faGade. While a belt course is not implemented in the design, Stafffeels the jloors are distinct as designed. Stafffinds this criterion to be met. 6 1.35 A new building should be designed to maintain the stature of traditional street level frontage. â€¢ This should be 13-15 ft. in floor to floor height on the first floor â€¢ The minimum required first floor height must be maintained for at least the first 50 foot depth of the lot, and may only be dropped to a lower height beyond that point for areas that are devoted to storage, circulation, offices, restaurant kitchens, alley commercial spaces, or similar secondary uses. Staff Response: As previously mentioned, the first floor of the proposed building maintains a height of 13'. This height carries through the entirety of the first floor, and does not drop at any point to a lower height. Sta#jinds this criterion to be met. 1.36 Minimize the appearance of a tall third floor. â€¢ Where a third floor's floor to ceiling height is in excess of 12 ft., it should be set back a minimum of 15 ft. from the street faga(le to reduce the apparent height. â€¢ Increase the parapet height to screen the visual impact of a tall top floor. â€¢ The design of a setback third floor shall be simpler in form, more subdued in modeling, detail and color than the primary fa~ade Staff Response: The proposed building's third floor measures at a height of 11 ', and is not set back from the street facade. The massing of the third.floor is reduced by the modules, which step up and down across the top length of the building. The height of the third jloor is also minimized by the 19' setback elevator overrun on the building's Hyman Ave fagide. The second and third jloors are designed to work together with a subdued color palate and uncomplicated design as compared with the primarily glass jirst story. Sta# finds this criterion to be met. 1.37 The first floor fagade should be designed to concentrate interest on the first level, using the highest quality o f design, detailing and materials. â€¢ A strong and distinctively designed retail framework for the first floor of the building â€¢ An entryway designed to use the full height of the storefront â€¢ A distinct change in the palette of materials used for the first floor design framework â€¢ The depth and strength o f the modeling o f elements and details Staff Response: The first jloor is designed primarily with all glass materials, which creates a high degree of transparency and a distinctive jloor. The first story is proposed as retail space, and the glass windows are conducive to supporting a successful retail environment. The building has multiple entryways, 1.38 The retails entrance should be at sidewalk level. 1 â€¢ All entrances shall be ADA compliant â€¢ On sloping sites the retail frontage should be as close to a level entrance as possible Staff Response: The proposed building has been designed with all retail entrances at sidewalk level The Applicant has assured Staff that the entrances will be designed to be ADA compliant. This is a -flat site, with no slopes to mitigate for. Stajfjinds this criterion to be met. 1.39 Incorporate an airlock entry into the plan for all new structures. â€¢ An airlock entry that projects forward of the primary fagde at the sidewalk is inappropriate â€¢ Adding temporary entries during the winter season detracts from the character of the historic district â€¢ Using a temporary vinyl or fabric "airlock" to provide protection from winter weather is not permitted Staff Response: An airlock is proposed for the midblock entrance on Hyman Ave that leads to a central lobby from which all building uses may be accessed. The Applicant is proposing no externally projecting airlocks, nor any temporary vinyl or fabric airlocks. Stall finds this criterion to be met. 1.40 Window area along the first floor shall be a minimum of 60% of exterior street fagade area when facing a principal street(s). Staff Response: The building's front faqade has been determined by Staff to be E. Hyman Ave. The proposed building's first Boor front fagide is comprised primarily of glass, and exceeds the 60% minimum window area. Stafffinds this criterion to be met. 1.41 Where appropriate a building shall be designed to maintain the character and transparency of the traditional street level retail frontage. Staff Response: The proposed building has been designed such that the first floor retail has a high degree of transparency, with floor to ceiling glass windows which will allow direct views into the commercial spaces within. This will maintain the character and transparency of traditional street level frontage. Staffjinds this criterion to be met. 1.42 Design of the first floor storefront should include particular attention to the following: â€¢ The basic elements and proportions of storefront design â€¢ Depth and strength o f modeling â€¢ The palette of materials and finishes used in both the structural framework and the storefront window â€¢ The concentration of architectural detail to ensure a rich visual experience 8 â€¢ The complimentary use of signage and lettering to enhance the retail and downtown character â€¢ The use of lighting to accentuate visual presence Staff Response: The first floor storefront has been designed with a variable front fagade, forgoing a flat face and creating visual interest with the use of the building's modules. The variable setbacks of the three modules also create depth and strength of modeling. The storefront is designed such that it has a great degree of transparency, and the entryways are easily located. Attention has been paid to the materials and jinishes of the structural framework with the use of various materials of complementary color. The Applicant has indicated intention to create signage and lighting that will enhance the character of the building, draw attention to the ground jloor retail, and compliment the surrounding Commercial Character Area. Stafffinds this criterion to be met. 1.43 Retail frontage facing onto side courts or rear alleys should follow similar design principles to the street frontage, adjusted for the scale of the space. â€¢ It should be designed with a similar attention to architectural articulation, detail and materials. â€¢ These should have a richness of detail that is inviting to users. Staff Response: The proposed building does not have alley access, nor are there any retail spaces that are designed to face side courts. Stafffinds this criterion to be not-applicable. 1.44 A large building should reflect the traditional lot width in form and variation of its roof. This should be achieved through the following: â€¢ A set back of the top floor from the front faQade â€¢ Reflect the traditional lot width in the roof plane Staff Response: The proposed building's roof closely reflects the City's traditional lot widths in form. Three distinct modules within the building provide variation of the roof. The building's top Jloor is not setback from the front fa<ade, rather it actually overhangs the first story, a design element that was previously approved by the Planning and Zoning Commission during Conceptual Commercial Design Review. Stafffinds this criterion to be met. 1.45 The roofscape should be designed with the same design attention as the secondary elevations of the building â€¢ Group and screen mechanical units from view â€¢ Locate mechanical equipment to the rear of the roof area â€¢ Position, articulate and design rooftop enclosures or structures to reflect the modulation and character of the building 9 â€¢ Use materials which complement the design of the building facades â€¢ Design roof garden areas to be unobtrusive from the street â€¢ Use 'green roof' design best practice, where feasible Staff Response: The proposed roofscape has been designed with very few mechanical features. The elevator overrun will impact the roof, and is setback from the building's front fa<ade by approximately 18'. There are a number of green roofs proposed. The majority of mechanical equipment is proposed to be located in the basement of the building. Staff finds this criterion to be met. 1.46 High quality, durable materials should be employed â€¢ The palette o f materials should be specified, including samples o f materials as required Staff Response: The proposed building's materials are high quality and consist of brick, wood, laminate and steel. Visual samples of the materials can be found on sheet AO. 5a of the application. 1.47 Building materials should have these features: â€¢ Convey the quality and range of materials seen traditionally â€¢ Reduce the perceived scale of the building and enhance visual interest of the fagade â€¢ Convey a human scale Staff Response: The proposed building's materials are complimentary to those found on other buildings in the Commercial Character Area, utilizing brick, wood, laminate and steel, and convey the types of materials found traditionally throughout the City. The use of the different materials throughout the building's modules will help to create visual interest. The high use of glass on the jirst story helps to break up the massing of the second module, reducing the scale of the building and providing transparency into the commercial areas. The use of modules further helps to convey a sense of human scale by setting back particular areas of the building, thereby minimizing its massing. Staffjinds this criterion to be met. 1.48 A building or addition should reflect the quality and variation in material seen traditionally. Staff Response: The materials proposed for the building are those that have been used traditionally throughout the City. The design incorporates these traditional materials into a more modern design. Staffjinds this criterion to be met. 1.49 Where contemporary materials are use they shall be: â€¢ High quality in durability and finish â€¢ Detailed to convey a human scale â€¢ Compatible with a traditional masonry palette 10 Staff Response: The most contemporary of materiats used is the laminate with wood jinish, which is proposed for the second module of the building'sfront faqade. This appears to be of high quality in durability and jinish. The use of this material will help to soften the largest module on the building, and help it to balance the glass that is found on the first story, creating a building with a greater sense of human scale. This material is compatible with the more traditional materials (glass, brick and wood and steel) that are also proposed to be used on this building. Stafffinds this criterion to be met. 1.50 Materials used for the third floor accommodation set back from the street facades should be more subdued than primary facades Staff Response: The proposed building's was approved at conceptual design review by the Planning and Zoning Commission with second and third floors that are cantilevered over the first floor. Therefore this standard does not fully apply to the proposed building. However, the upper floors are composed of laminate panels with a wood finish, and are a subdued, natural color which aid in balancing the glass that makes up the majority of the jirst floor. Staffjinds this criterion to be met. 1.51 Paving and landscaping should be designed to complement and enhance the immediate setting of the building area. Staff Response: The Applicant is proposing a widened walkway along the E. Hyman side of the building, which will serve to enhance the pedestrian experience along the block from the new Aspen Art Museum to the corner of Hyman and Hunter. New street trees are proposed between the pedestrian walkway and the street, which wit! serve as a buffer for pedestrians using the walkway. Staffjinds this criterion to be met. 11 1 RESOLUTION NO. (SERIES OF 2013) A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF ASPEN PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION APPROVING FINAL COMMERCIAL DESIGN FOR THE DEVELOPMENT OF A MIXED-USE BUILDING AND MINOR EXPANSION OF COMMERCIAL, LODGE OR MIXED-USE DEVELOPMENT FOR THE PROPERTY LOCATED AT 601 E. HYMAN AVE, CITY OF ASPEN, PITKIN COUNTY, COLORADO Parcel ID: 2737-182-250-31,2737-182-250-28,2737-182-250-30, 2737-182-258-01, 2737-182-250-27,2737-182-250-32,2737-182-250-33,2737-182-250-29 WHEREAS, the Community Development Department received an application from the Victorian Square, LLC (Applicant), represented by Stan Clauson of Stan Clauson Associates, Inc., requesting the Planning and Zoning Commission approve a Final Commercial Design for Mixed-Use development at 601 E. Hyman Ave; and, WHEREAS, pursuant to Chapter 26.412 of the Land Use Code, commercial design review approval may be granted by the Planning and Zoning Commission at a duly noticed public hearing; and, WHEREAS, the Applicant received Conceptual Commercial Design Review approval from the Planning and Zoning Commission on October 16, 2012 via Resolution 19, Series of 2012; and, WHEREAS, the applicant received Growth Management Review approval by the Planning and Zoning Commission who also provided a favorable recommendation to City Council for Subdivision Review on December 4, 2012 via Resolution 22, Series of 2012; and, WHEREAS, the applicant proceeded to vacate the condominium plat for Victorian Square Condominium Units 1-7 (Reception No. 598931) and to vacate all covenants for Victorian Square Condominiums (Reception No. 598932). WHEREAS, the applicant requests approval by the Planning and Zoning Commission for Final Commercial Design Review and Minor expansion of commercial, lodge or mixed-use development; and, WHEREAS, upon initial review of the application and the applicable code standards, the Community Development Director recommended approval ofthe application; and, WHEREAS, the Planning and Zoning Commission has reviewed and considered the development proposal under the applicable provisions of the Municipal Code as identified herein, has reviewed and considered the recommendation of the Community Development Director, and has taken and considered public comment; and, WHEREAS, the Planning and Zoning Commission finds that the development proposal meets or exceeds all applicable development standards; and, WHEREAS, the Planning and Zoning Commission finds that this resolution furthers and is necessary for the promotion of public health, safety and wel fare. 1 1 NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED BY THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF ASPEN, COLORADO, THAT: Section 1: Pursuant to the procedures and standards set forth in Title 26 of the Aspen Municipal Code, the Planning and Zoning Commission hereby approves Final Commercial Design Review for the redevelopment of 601 E. Hyman, as illustrated in Exhibit A. Section 2: Pursuant to the procedures and standards set forth in Title 26 of the Aspen Municipal Code, the Planning and Zoning Commission hereby approves the minor expansion of commercial, lodge or mixed-use development, with an increase of 52 sq. ft. of net leasable space. This will increase the amount of Full-Time Equivalents (FTE's) that must be mitigated for, and is an addition to the previous approval received through Resolution 22, Series of 2013. Section 3: All material representations and commitments made by the Applicant pursuant to the development proposal approvals as herein awarded are hereby incorporated in such plan development approvals and the same shall be complied with as if fully set forth herein, unless amended by an authorized entity. Section 3: This Resolution shall not affect any existing litigation and shall not operate as an abatement of any action or proceeding now pending under or by virtue of the ordinances repealed or amended as herein provided, and the same shall be conducted and concluded under such prior ordinances. Section 4: If any section, subsection, sentence, clause, phrase, or portion of this Resolution is for any reason held invalid or unconstitutional in a court of competent jurisdiction, such portion shall be deemed a separate, distinct and independent provision and shall not affect the validity of the remaining portions thereof. Section 5: Vested Rights The development approvals granted pursuant to Planning and Zoning Commission shall be vested for a period of three (3) years from the date of issuance of the Development Order. No later than fourteen ( 14) days following the final approval of all requisite reviews necessary to obtain a Development Order as set forth in this Resolution, the City Clerk shall cause to be published in a newspaper of general circulation within the jurisdictional boundaries of the City of Aspen, a notice advising the general public of the approval of a site specific development plan and creation of a vested property right pursuant to this Title. Such notice shall be substantially in the following form: Notice is hereby given to the general public of the approval of a vested property right, pursuant to the Land Use Code of the City of Aspen and Title 24, Article 67, Colorado Revised Statutes, pertaining to the following described property: 601 E. Hyman Avenue, 2 City of Aspen, CO by Resolution No. Series of 2013, of the Aspen Planning and Zoning Commission. APPROVED by the Planning and Zoning Commission of the City of Aspen on this 18th day of June, 2012. LJ Erspamer, Chairman APPROVED AS TO FORM: Deb Quinn, Assistant City Attorney ATTEST: Jackie Lothian, Deputy City Clerk Exhibit A: Approved Commercial Design Review Plans 3 U f bill--I AFFIDAVIT OF PUBLIC NOTICE REQUIRED BY SECTION 26.304.060 (E), ASPEN LAND USE CODE ADDRESS OF PROPERTY: GO I EÂ· }< , Aspen, CO L' SCHEDULED PUBLIC HEARING DATE: Jv,%6 1 7 â‚¬ 4:30 Fyvi , 2013 STATE OF COLORADO ) ) SS. County of Pitkin ) I, 2'*st 4 SceQ-1 (name, please print) being or representink an Applicant to the City of Aspen, Colorado, hereby personally certify that I have complied with the public notice requirements of Section 26.304.060 (E) of the Aspen Land Use Code in the following manner: 4~ Publication of notice: By the publication in the legal notice section of an official paper or a paper of general circulation in the City of Aspen at least fifteen (15) days prior to the public hearing. A copy of the publication is attached hereto. 1 Posting ofnotice: By posting of notice, which form was obtained from the Community Development Department, which was made of suitable, waterproof materials, which was not less than twenty-two (22) inches wide and twenty-six (26) inches high, and which was composed of letters not less than one inch in height. Said notice was posted at least fifteen (15) days prior to the public hearing and was continuously visible from the day of , 20 , to and including the date and time of the public hearing. A photograph of the posted notice (sign) is attached hereto. Mailing of notice. By the mailing of a notice obtained from the Community Development Department, which contains the information described in Section 26.304.060(E)(2) of the Aspen Land Use Code. At least fifteen (15) days prior to the public hearing, notice was hand delivered or mailed by first class postage prepaid U.S. mail to all owners of property within three hundred (300) feet of the property subject to the development application. The names and addresses of property owners shall be those on the current tax records of Pitkin County as they appeared no more than sixty (60) days prior to the date of the public hearing. A copy of the owners and governmental agencies so noticed is attached hereto. (Continued on next page) Rezoning or text amendment: Whenever the official zoning district map is in any way to be changed or amended incidental to or as part of a general revision of this Title, or whenever the text of this Title is to be amended, whether such revision be made by repeal of this Title and enactment of a new land use regulation, or otherwise, the requirement of an accurate survey map or other sufficient legal description of, and the notice to and listing of names and addresses of owners of real property in the area of the proposed change shall be waived. However, the proposed zoning map shall be available for public inspection in the planning agency during all business hours for fifteen (15) days prior to the public hearing on such amendments. 4-L 1- Signature The foregoing "Affidavit of Notice" was acknowledged before me this 3 1 day of BAW\K , 2013 by Av~Ll,A Sco.(-~1 WITNESS MY HAND AND OFFICIAL SEAL My commission expires: 430< \Â© p V kug-Â« 6-A -9~ fÂ»r- Notary Public ATTACHMENTS AS APPLICABLE: * COPY OF THE PUBLICATION * PHOTOGRAPH OF THE POSTED NOTICE (SIGN) * LIST OF THE OWNERS AND GOVERNMENT AGENGIES NOTIED BY MAIL * APPLICANT CERTICICATION OF MINERAL ESTATE OWNERS NOTICE AS REQUIRED BY C.R.S. Â§24-65.5-103.3 El'9LIC NOTICE RE: 601 E. HYMAN - GMOS APPROVAL UP- DATE AND FINAL COMMERCIAL DESIGN RE- VIEW NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that a public hearing will be held on Tlesday, June 18,2013 at a meet- I ing to begin at 4:30 p.m. before the Aspen Plan- ning and Zoning Commission, Sister Cities Meet- ing Room, City Hall, 130 S. Galena St., Aspen, to consider an application submitted by Victorian Square, LLC of 601 E. Hyman Ave, for the proper- ty legally described as City and Townsite of Aspen, Block 100. the North 1/2 of Lots A, 8 & C. common- ly known as 601 E. Hyman Ave., represented by , Stan Clauson Associates Inc. The applicant is re- questing approval of a minor expansion of a com- mercial, lodge or mixed use development as well ' as approval of final commercial design review to develop a three-story building containing a mix of commercial and residential uses. For further in- formation, contact Sara Nadolny at the City of As- pen Community Development Department, 130 S. Galena St., Aspen, CO, (970) 429.2739, sara.nad olny@cityofaspen.com. W LJ Erspamer, Chair Aspen Planning and Zoning Commission Published in the Aspen Times Weekly on May 30, 2013.[9211842] PUBLIC NOTICE RE: 601 E. HYMAN - GMQS APPROVAL UPDATE AND FINAL COMMERCIAL DESIGN REVIEW NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that a public hearing will be held on Tuesday, June 18, 2013 at a meeting to begin at 4:30 p.m. before the Aspen Planning and Zoning Commission, Sister Cities Meeting Room, City Hall, 130 S. Galena St., Aspen, to consider an application submitted by ' ~ Victorian Square, LLC of 601 E. Hyman Ave, for the property legally described as City and Townsite of Aspen, Block 100, the North 14 of Lots A, B & C, commonly known as 601 E. Hyman Ave., represented by Stan Clauson Associates Inc. The applicant is requesting approval of a minor expansion of a commercial, lodge or mixed use development as well as approval of final commercial design review to develop a three-story building containing a mix of commercial and residential uses. For further information, contact Sara Nadolny at the City of Aspen Community Development Department, 130 S. Galena St., Aspen, CO, (970) 429.2739, sara.nadolny@cityofaspen.com. s/ LJ Erspamer, Chair Aspen Planning and Zoning Commission Published in the Aspen Times on May 30,2013 City of Aspen Account AFFIDAVIT OF PUBLIC NOTICE REQUIRED BY SECTION 26.304.060 (E), ASPEN LAND USE CODE ADDRESS OF PROPERTY: 601 E. Hyman Avenue , Aspen, CO SCHEDULED PUBLIC HEARING DATE: 18 June ,2013 STATE OF COLORADO ) ) SS. County of Pitkin ) I, Stan Clauson (name, please print) being or representing an Applicant to the City of Aspen, Colorado, hereby personally certify that I have complied with the public notice requirements of Section 26.304.060 (E) ofthe Aspen Land Use Code in the following manner: X Publication ofnotice: By the publication in the legal notice section of an official paper or a paper of general circulation in the City of Aspen at least fifteen (15) days prior to the public hearing. A copy of the publication is attached hereto. X Posting of notice: By posting of notice, which form was obtained from the Community Development Department, which was made of suitable, waterproof materials, which was not less than twenty-two (22) inches wide and twenty-six (26) inches high, and which was composed of letters not less than one inch in height. Said notice was posted at least fifteen (15) days prior to the public hearing on the 29 day of May , 2013 , to and including the date and time of the public hearing. A photograph of the posted notice (sign) is attached hereto. -X Mailing Of notice, By the mailing of a notice obtained from the Community Development Department, which contains the information described in Section 26.304.060(ID(2) of the Aspen Land Use Code. At least fifteen (15) days prior to the public hearing, notice was hand delivered or mailed by first class postage prepaid U.S. mail to all owners of property within three hundred (300) feet of the property subject to the development application. The names and addresses of property owners shall be those on the current tax records of Pitkin County as they appeared no more than sixty (60) days prior to the date of the public hearing. A copy of the owners and governmental agencies so noticed is attached hereto. ruja Neighborhood Outreach: Applicant attests that neighborhood outreach, summarized and attached, was conducted prior to the first public hearing as required in Section 26.304.035, Neighborhood Outreach. A copy of the neighborhood outreach summary, including the method of public notification and a copy of any documentation that was presented to the public is attached hereto. (continued on next page) X Mineral Estate Owner Notice. By Ole certified mailing of notice, return receipt requested, to affected mineral estate owners by at least thirty (30) days prior to the date scheduled for the initial public hearing on the application of development. The names and addresses of mineral estate owners shall be those on the current tax records of Pitkin County. At a minimum, Subdivisions that create more than one lot, Planned Unit Developments, Specially Planned Areas, and COWAPs are subject to this notice requirement. Rezoning or text amendment. Whenever the official zoning district map is in any way to be changed or amended incidental to or as part of a general revision of this Title, or whenever the text of this Title is to be amended, whether such revision be made by repeal of this Title and enactment of a new land use regulation, or otherwise, the requirement of an accurate survey map or other sufficient legal description of, and the notice to and listing of names and addresses of owners of real property in the area of the proposed change shall be waived. However, the proposed zoning map shall be available for public inspection in the planning agency during all business hours for fifteen (15) days prior to the public hearing on such amendments. 962 ff Signature The foregoing "Affidavit of Notice" was acknowledged before me this 3 day of June , 20 13, by Stan Clauson 6 WITNESS MY HAND AND OFFICIAL SEAL PATRICK S. RAWLEY NOTARY PUBLIC STATE OF COLORADO My commission expires: 26 \Jb o ~ -20/ 6 NOTARY ID #19994012259 My Commission Expires July 26, 2016 *-C-â€¢A O. L - )----- ---~ Notary Public ATTACHMENTS AS APPLICABLE: â€¢ COPY OF THE PUBLICATION â€¢ PHOTOGRAPH OF THE POSTED NOTICE (SIGN) â€¢ LIST OF THE OWNERS AND GOVERNMENTAL AGENCIES NOTICED BY MAIL â€¢ APPLICANT CERTIFICATION OF MINERAL ESTAE OWNERS NOTICE AS REQUIRED BY C.R.S. Â§24-65.5-103.3 L~-7 1 2 \ 1 STAN CLAUSON ASSOCIATESINC landscape architecture.planning.resort design .:A ' I 412 North Mill Street Aspen, Colorado 81611 t. 970/925-2323 f. 970/920-1628 !!1 ~2",Â·i,p~ info@scaplanning.com www.scaplanning.com 3 June 2013 Ms. Sara Nadolny, Planner Tech City of Aspen Community Development Department 130 S. Galena Street, 3rd Floor Aspen, CO 81611 Re: 601 East Hyman / Research of Mineral Estate Owners Dear Sara: On behalf of our clients, Victorian Square, LLC, and in connection with the application for Final Design Review for the properties located at 601 East Hyman, we have performed the public notice requirements as required by Sec. 26.304.060(E) of the City of Aspen Land Use Code. Among the requirements contained in Sec. 26.304.060(E) is the requirement to notify affected mineral estate owners by certified mailing at least thirty (30) days prior to the date of the public hearing. Stan Clauson Associates, Inc has researched the existence of mining claim or possession deeds dating to the late 19th century with the Pitkin County Clerk and Recorder's records (the "Public Records") using the Title Policy issued by Pitkin County title, Inc., Policy Number 1312- 120156, issued to Victorian Square, LLC. A review of the Public Records does not generate any record of deeds relating to mining claims or possession deeds. This letter is submitted to you to confirm our good-faith attempts to locate a list of mineral estate owners. Please call me with any questions. cVery trwly yours, Signed before me this 3rd day of June, 2013 by Stan Clauson. WITNESS MY HAND AND OFFICIAL SEAL Stan Clausa, AICP. ASLA MY COMMISSION EXPIRES: 2 6 JU L -PC>(-=t STAN CLAUSON ASSOCIATES, INC. P~-re- C ck 5. 9. w~e.y ~ CC: Andy Hecht, Esq. Notary Public 30Â»cu--allo <IN10â€¢-â€¢-d-e.><-- Notary Public's Signature PATRICK S. RAWLEY ~ NOTARY PUBLIC STATE OF COLORADO NOTARY ID #19994012259 My Commission Expires July 26,2016 ' a -1. - W:' T ' :8 91*.. 34 1 * ~ *4. . 2Â»19.4--, Â·18'C 4429 . P Â· 4 - r..- -u-, 1 - ~4 *.I . I . +4 "'C'. ' . Â·-I . /:**2.': ... DATE: June 18.2013 PUBLIC NOTICE ~1 1 - TIME: 4:30 pm - ' PLACE: City Hall. 130 Galena St. Aspen. CO 81611 1 , r.4,0.-Â· r 9 4,1.- .'- 2 Ave, as owner of this properly, is ~ ' t .. proposing to redevelop this property eÂ·- , 4 as a mixed use building and will ' 7. 5.,9 : 3 :* appear before the Planning & approvals include the minor expansion of a mixed-use %.*. development and final commercial 4. 7 -- design review. For more information , Dept. 970-920-5090. .iNZ.. 2:-=. 7- - = JA?f,f.*- .f-- 0~15 - PURPOSE: - Victorian Square LLC, 601 E Hyman u Zoning Commission. Land ilse contact the City of Aspen Planning - -2. a - # *--3-",-4-<1 .-1 diÂ· - .'..1 .. 44; ,"%: -1 ~ r Lt.* PUBLIC NOTICE RE: 601 E. HYMAN - GMQS APPROVAL UPDATE AND FINAL COMMERCIAL DESIGN REVIEW . .1 0 1 NOTICE IS IIEREBY GIVEN that a public hearing will be held on Tuesday, June 18, 2013 at a L meeting to begin at 4:30 p.m. before the Aspen Planning and Zoning Commission, Sister Cities Meeting Room, City Hall, 130 S. Galena St., Aspen, to consider an application submitted by 9; Victorian Square, LLC of 601 E. Hyman Ave, for the property legally described as City and Townsite of Aspen, Block 100, the North !4 ofLots A, B & C, commonly known as 601 E. Hyman Ave., represented by Stan Clauson Associates Inc. The applicant is requesting approval of a minor expansion of a commercial, lodge or mixed use development as well as approval of final commercial design review to develop a three-story building containing a mix of commercial and residential uses. For further information, contact Sara Nadolny at the City of Aspen Community Development Department, 130 S. Galena St., Aspen, CO, (970) 429.2739, .~. sara.nadolny@cityofaspen.com. d 1,3 Erspamer, Chair Aspen Planning and Zoning Commission Published in the Aspen Times on May 30,2013 City ofAspen Account 1 1 / Easy PeelÂ® labels | A I Bend along line to 1 ~* AVERYÂ® 5160Â® 1 Use AveryÂ® Template 5160Â® Feed Paper ' expose Pop-up Edgeâ„¢ * 2012 TRUST FBI RHODA ISRAEL 85% 308 HUNTER LLC 4 SKIERS LP 708 3RD AVE 490 WILLIAMS ST 1108 NORFLEET DR NEW YORK, NY 10017 DENVER, CO 80218 NASHVILLE, TN 372201412 514 AH LLC 517 EAST HOPKINS AVENUE LLC 520 EAST COOPER PTNRS LLC 514 E HYMAN AVE 517 E HOPKINSAVE 402 MIDLAND PARK ASPEN, CO 81611 ASPEN, CO 81611 ASPEN, CO 81611 610 EAST HYMAN LLC 630 EAST HYMAN LLC 633 SPRING 11 LLC C/O CHARLES CUNNIFFE 532 E HOPKINS AVE 418 E COOPER AVE #207 610 E HYMAN AVE ASPEN, CO 81611 ASPEN, CO 81611 ASPEN, CO 81611 635 E HOPKINS LLC ANDERSON ROBERT M & LOUISE E ASPEN ART MUSEUM 532 E HOPKINS 1021 23RD ST 590 N MILL ST ASPEN, CO 81611 CHETEK, WI 54728 ASPEN, CO 81611 ASPEN BLOCK 99 LLC ASPEN CORE VENTURES LLC ASPEN GROVE ASSOCIATES LLP 532 E HOPKINS AVE 418 E COOPER AVE #207 51027 HWY 6 &24 #100 ASPEN, CO 81611 ASPEN, CO 81611 GLENWOOD SPRINGS, CO 81601 ASPEN PLAZA LLC ASPEN KOEPPEL LLC ASPEN SQUARE VENTURES LLP PO BOX 1709 3551 ST GAUDENS RD 602 E COOPER #202 C/O STEVE MARCUS COCONUT GROVE, FL 331336530 ASPEN, CO 81611 ASPEN, CO 81612 AV STEIN LLC 19.08% AVP PROPERTIES LLC BASS CAHN 601 LLC 601 E HYMAN AVE 630 E HYMAN AVE #25 PO BOX 4060 ASPEN, CO 81611 ASPEN, CO 81611 ASPEN, CO 81612 BATTLE GERALD LIVING TRUST BELL MTN QUAL RES CONDO ASSOC BAUM ROBERT E HIXON BURT LIVING TRUST LLC PO BOX 1518 PO BOX 2847 320 S SPRING ST STOCKBRIDGE, MA 01262 NEWPORT BEACH, CA 92659 ASPEN, CO 81611 BERN FAMILY ASPEN PROPERTY LLC BERSCH BLANCHE TRUST BG SPRING LLC 65 FIRST NECK LN 9642 YOAKUM DR 300 S SPRING ST #202 SOUTHAMPTON, NY 11968 BEVERLY HILLS, CA 90210 ASPEN, CO 81611. BOOGIES BUILDING OF ASPEN LLC BIG HOPKINS LLC BISCHOFF JOHN C C/O LEONARD WEINGLASS 421 N BEVERLY DR #300 502 S VIA GOLONDRINA 534 E COOPER AVE BEVERLY HILLS, CA 90210 TUCSON, AZ 85716-5843 ASPEN, CO 81611 ttiquettes faciles & peler Repliez & la hachure afin de | www.avery.com Sens de Utilisez le gabarit AVERYÂ® 5160Â® chargement r6v6Ier le rebord Pop-uPT' 1 1-800-GO-AVERY i / 1/ Easy Peel@ labels J A I Bend along line to 1 Use AveryÂ® Template 5160Â® 1 Feed Paper expose Pop-up Edgeâ„¢ 1 ~R AVERYÂ® 5160Â® I A BORGIOTTI CLAUDIO BPOE ASPEN LODGE #224 BRONSON RICHARD L TRUST 50% 10509 HUNTING CREST LN 210 S GALENA ST #21 4510 NE DELAMAR PL VIENNA, VA 22192 ASPEN, CO 81611 LEES SUMMIT, MO 64064 CALGI RAYMOND D CARVER RUTH A & MARTIN G CAVES KAREN W 134 TEWKESBURY RD 10 BYRON LN 1 BARRENGER CT SCARSDALE, NY 10583 MUSCATINE, IA 52761 NEWPORT BEACH, CA 92660 CHATEAU ASPEN UNIT 21-A LLC CHATEAU ASPEN CONDO ASSOC CJAR LLC 421 ASPEN AIRPORT BUSINESS CTR 630 E COOPER AVE 2514 LAKE MEAD DR STE G ASPEN, CO 81611 LAFAYETTE, CO 80026 ASPEN, CO 816113551 COOPER STREET DEVELOPMENT LLC COOPER SPRINGS LLC COOPER STREET COMPANY C/O PYRAMID PROPERTY ADVISORS 4 EASTON OVAL 601 E HYMAN AVE 418 E COOPER AVE #207 COLUMBUS, OH 43219 ASPEN, CO 81611 ASPEN, CO 81611 DCGB LLC COX JAMES E LIVING TRUST DALY CAROL Y REV TRUST ATT GIORGIO RIGHETTI CFO 3284 SURMONT DR 617 E COOPER 610 WEST 52 ST LAFAYETTE, CA 94549 ASPEN, CO 81611 NEW YORK, NY 10019 DIBRELL CHARLES G JR & FRANCES DURANT AH LLC EB BUILDING ASPEN LLC 24 ADLER CIR PO BOX 4068 1601 ELM ST #4000 GALVESTON, TX 77551-5828 ASPEN, CO 81612 DALLAS, TX 75201 ECCHYMOSIS LLC ELLERON CHEMICALS CORP ERGAS VENESSA BLAIR & CLAUDE 4802 E 2ND ST # 2 2101 WAUKEGAN RD #210 PO BOX 4316 LONG BEACH, CA 90803 BANNOCKBURN, IL 60015 ASPEN, CO 81612 EXELCEDAR INC 20% FEHR EDITH B REVOCABLE TRUST FERRY JAMES H 111 534 E HYMAN AVE 543 FOX RUN DR BOX 166 ASPEN, CO 81611 CARBONDALE, CO 81623-8502 GLENCOE, IL 600220166 FITZGERALD FAMILY PARTNERSHIP LTD FURNGULF LTD FLY MARIE N C/O PITKIN COUNTY DRY GOODS LLC A COLO JOINT VENTURE 7447 PEBBLE POINTE 520 E COOPER 616 E HYMANAVB W BLOOMFIELD, MI 48322 ASPEN, CO 81611 ASPEN, CO 81611 GELD LLC GILBERT GARY GOFEN ETHEL CARO TRUSTEE C/O LOWELL MEYER 1556 ROYAL BLVD y 455 CITY FRONT PLAZA PO BOX 1247 GLENDALE, CA 91207 CHICAGO, IL 60611 ASPEN, CO 81612-1247 ttiquettes faciles & peter ~ A Repliez & la hachure afin de ~ www. avery.com ~ Utilisez le gabarit AVERYÂ® 5160Â® charaement ravaler le rebord Pop-upTM 1 1-800-GO-AVERY l Sens de 1 1 Easy PeelÂ® Labels i A Bend along line to ] ~ AVERYÂ® 5160Â® ~ Use AveryÂ® Template 5160Â® Feed Paper expose Pop-up Edgeâ„¢ A GOODING SEAN A 80% & RICHARD L GOLDEN PANTHERS LLC GONE WEST LLC 20% 60 S MARKET ST #1400 401 W CENTER C/O PARAGON RANCH INC SAN JOSE, CA 95113-2396 SEARCY, AR 721451406 620 E HYMAN AVE #1E ASPEN, CO 81611 GORDON LEONARD & ELLEN GREENWAY COMPANY INC GROSFELD ASPEN PROP PART LLC 12204 GALESVILLE DR 666 TRAVIS ST #100 10880 WILSHIRE BLVD #2222 GAITHERSBURG, MD 20878 SHREVEPORT, LA 71101 LOS ANGELES, CA 90024 HENDRICKS SIDNEY J HIMAN LLC HEMP SUZANNE LIV TRUST YOLANDE EVERHARD PO BOX 6159 15470 POMONA RD 6614 LAKE VILLE RD SWANBOURNE WA 6010 BROOKFIELD, WI 53005 PETALUMA, CA 94954-9256 AUSTRALIA, HORSEFINS LLC HUNKE CARLTON J LVG TRST HUNTER PLAZA ASSOCIATES LLP 601 E HOPKINS AVE 4410 TIMBERLINE DR SW 602 E COOPER #202 ASPEN, CO 81611 FARGO, ND 58103 ASPEN, CO 81611 JOSHUA & CO REAL ESTATE HOLDINGS ISRAEL KENNETH 25% JENNE LLP LLC 615 OCEAN BLVD 1510 WINDSOR RD 300 S HUNTER ST GOLDEN BEACH, FL 33160 AUSTIN, TX 77402 ASPEN, CO 81611 JOYCE EDWARD KOEPPEL KEVIN F KRAJIAN RON 1310 RITCHIE CT 4150 PARK AVE 617 E COOPER AVE #114 CHICAGO, IL 60610 MIAMI, FL 33133 ASPEN, CO 81611 LCT LP KUTINSKY BRIAN MALLARD ENTERPRISES LP TENNESSEE LIMITED PARTNERSHIP 26480 NORMANDY RD 317 SIDNEY BAKER S #400 PO BOX 101444 FRANKLIN, MI 480251034 KERRVILLE, TX 78028 NASHVILLE, TN 37224-1444 MARTELL BARBARA MATTHEWS ZACHARY MAVROVIC ERNA 702 E HYMAN AVE PO BOX 10582 530 E 72ND ST APT 15-C ASPEN, CO 81611 ASPEN, CO 81612 NEW YORK, NY 10021 MAYFAIR INVESTMENTS LLC MCMURRAYWILLIAM & HELEN MJM AMENDED & RESTATED TRUST PO BOX 268 29 MIDDLE HEAD RD 1776 SOUTH LN RICHMOND VICTORIA 3121 MOSMAN NSW 2088 NORTHBROOK, IL ~60062 AUSTRALIA, AUSTRALIA, MJ M HOLDINGS 11 LLC MOEN DONNE & ELIZABETH FAM TRUST MORRIS ROBERT P 1701 GOLF RD 8 CABALLEROS RD 600 E HOPKINS AVE STE 304 TOWER 3 STE 203 ROLLING HILLS, CA 90274 ASPEN, CO 81611 ROLLING MEADOWS, IL 60008 ttiquettes fadles & peler i Repliez & la hachure afin de 1 www. avery. com ~ Utilisez le gabarit AVERYÂ® 5160Â® chargement ravaler le rebord Pop-ul,TM ; 1-800-GO-AVERY 1 Sens de ' 1 Easy PeelÂ® Labels i A I Bend along line to 1 Use AveryÂ® Template 5160Â® Feed Paper ' expose Pop-up Edgeâ„¢ c ~ AVERYÂ® 5160Â® | A NATTERER HELEN MYSKO BOHDAN D N S N ASSOCIATES INC 67 BAYPOINT CRES 615 E HOPKINS 11051 W ADDISON ST OTTAWA ONTARIO ASPEN, CO 81611 FRANKLIN PARK, IL 60131 CANADA K2G6R1, NEUMANN MICHAEL NIELSON COL STEVE & CAROL D NJ STEIN LLC 52.98% 7381 MOHASNIC DR 501 S FAIRFAX 418 E COOPER AVE #207 BLOOMFIELD HILLS, MI 48301 ALEXANDRIA, VA 22314 ASPEN, CO 81611 NONNIE LLC OBERHOLTZER JORDAN OLITSKY TAMAR & STEPHEN PO BOX 565 PO BOX 10582 PO BOX 514 ASPEN, CO 81612 ASPEN, CO 81612 GWYNEDD VALLEY, PA 19437 P & L PROPERTIES LLC PACIFIC WEST INVESTMENTS LLC PEARSON REBECCA J 101 S 3RD ST #360 320 MARTIN ST #100 1610 JOHNSON DR GRAND JUNCTION, CO 81501 BIRMINGHAM, MI 480091485 STILLWATER, MN 55082 PITKIN CENTER CONDO OWNERS PETERSON CHRISPY & JAMES E PITKIN COUNTY BANK 80% ASSOC 867 HAVEN CREST CT NORTH 534 E HYMAN AVE 517 W NORTH ST GRAND JUNCTION, CO 81506 ASPEN, CO 81611 ASPEN, CO 81611 PLATNIUM GLOBAL VENTURES LLC PORTE BROOKE RAHLEK LTD AT BANK OF AMERICA 344 PROSPECT ST #D 3520 PADDOCK RD 3903 BELLAIRE BLVD LA JOLLA, CA 92037 WESTON, FL 33331 HOUSTON, TX 77025 RED FLOWER PROP CO PTNSHP REICH DANIEL S TRUST 20% REICH MELVIN L TRUST 80% 575 MADISON AVE #1006 6 RINCON ST 4609 SEASHORE DR NEW YORK, NY 100222511 IRVINE, CA 92702 NEWPORT BEACH, CA 92663 RG COOPER ST 4.83% REUSS LIGHT LLC REVOLUTION PARTNERS LLC C/O RONALD GARFIELD PO BOX 5000 PO BOX 1247 601 E HYMAN AVE SNOWMASS VILLAGE, CO 81615 ASPEN, CO 81612 ASPEN, CO 81611 ROSS JOHN F RUBENSTEIN ALAN B & CAROL S RUST TRUST 7600 CLAYTON RD 57 OLDFIELD DR 9401 WILSHIRE BLyD #760 ST LOUIS, MO 63117 SHERBORN, MA 01770 BEVERLY HILLS, CA 90212 - RUTLEDGE REYNIE S & S REALTY PARTNERS LLC SANDIFER C W JR TRUST 50% 51 COUNTRY CLUB CIR 1040 FIFTH AVE #2C 240 LINDEN DR SEARCY, AR 72143 NEW YORK, NY 10028 BOULDER, CO 80304 ttiquettes fadles & peter A Repliez & la hachure afin de ~ www. avery. com | i Sens de Utilisez le gabarit AVERYÂ® 51600 charqement ravaler le rebord Pop-upâ„¢ 1 1-800-GO-AVERY 1 1 1 Easy PeelÂ® Labels | A I Bend along line to i Use AveryÂ® Template 5160Â® ' Feed Paper expose Pop-up Edgeâ„¢ ' ~ AVERYÂ® 5160Â® | A SCHEUERMAN JOANNE E SCHNITZER KENNETH L & LISA L SEGUIN JEFF W & MADALYN B TRUST 200 LOCUST ST #23A 2100 MCKINNEY AVE #1760 617 E COOPER #412 PHILADELPHIA, PA 19106 DALLAS, TX 75201 ASPEN, CO 81611 SEGUIN MARY E TRUST SHUMATE MARK SILVER DIP EQUITY VENTURE LLC 2404 LORING ST #155 BLDG 421 G ABC 2100 MCKINNEY STE 1760 SAN DIEGO, CA 92109 ASPEN, CO 81611 DALLAS, TX 75201 SJA ASSOCIATES LLC STEIN BUILDING LLC 23.11% STERLING TRUST COMP 418 E COOPER AVE #207 601 E HYMAN AVE 2091 MANDEVILLE CYN RD ASPEN, CO 81611 ASPEN, CO 81611 LOS ANGELES, CA 90049 SUITE 300 OFFICE LLC SUITE 300 OFFICE LLC TENNESSEE THREE 300 S SPRING ST #301 567 SAN NICOLAS DR PENTHOUSE PO BOX 101444 ASPEN, CO 81611 NEWPORT BEACH, CA 92660 NASHVILLE, TN 37224-1444 TENNESSEE THREE RENTALS TERMINELLO DENNIS J & KERRY L THOMPSON ROSS & LYNETTE C/O J H COBLE 656 RIDGEWAY 1502 GREYSTONE DR 5033 OLD HICKORY BLVD WHITE PLAINS, NY 10605-4323 CARBONDALE, CO 81623 NASHVILLE, TN 37218-4020 TOMKINS FAMILY TRUST TREUER CHRISTIN L VARADY LOTHAR & CHERYL TRUST 520 E COOPER AVE #209 5455 LANDMARKL PL #814 5036 MAUNALANI CIR ASPEN, CO 81611 GREENWOOD VILLAGE, CO 801111955 HONOLULU, HI 96816 VAUSE FAMILY TRUST WALLEN-OSTERAA REV LIVING TRUST WALLING REBECCA 3020 PLAZA DE MONTE 36 OCEAN VISTA 350 BLANCA AVE LAS VEGAS, NV 89102 NEWPORT BEACH, CA 92660 TAMPA, FL 33606 WARNKEN MARK G WAVO PROPERTIES LP WEIDEL LAWRENCE W PO BOX 556 512 1/2 E GRAND AVE #200 PO BOX 1007 STILLWATER, MN 550820556 DES MOINES, IA 50309-1942 MONROE, GA 30655 WEIGAND BROTHERS LLC WELLS RICHARD A & SUSAN T TRUST WF SWEARINGEN LLC 150 N MARKET 100 N TRYON ST 47TH FLR 380 FOREST HILL BD WICHITA, KS 67202 CHARLOTTE, NC 28202 MACON, GA 31216 WILLIAMS CRAIG & LEE FAM PTNRSHP WISE JOSEPH WM SNOWMASS LLC 5577 CEDAR CREEK 1320 HODGES ST 500 FIFTH AVE #2440 HOUSTON, TX 77056 RALEIGH, NC 27604-1414 NEW YORK, NY 10110 ttiquettes faciles & peler i * Repliez a la hachure afin de | www.avery.com 2 Sens de Utilisez le gabarit AVERYÂ® 5160Â® chargement ravaler le rebord Pop-UPTM 1 1-800-GO-AVERY 1 Easy PeelÂ® Labels A m Bend along line to ~ ~ AVERYÂ® 5160Â® i UseAveryÂ® Template 5160Â® ~ Feed Paper expose Pop-up Edgeâ„¢ WOLF LAWRENCE G TRUSTEE WOODS FRANK J 111 WRIGHT CHRISTOPHER N 22750 WOODWARD AVE #204 51027 HWY 6 & 24 STE 100 13 BRAMLEY RD FERNDALE, MI 48220 GLENWOOD SPRINGS, CO 81601 LONDON W10 6SP UK, YERAMIAN CHARLES REV TRUST PO BOX 12347 ASPEN, CO 81612 1 1/ Etiquettes faciles A peler 1 Repliez & la hachure afin de 1 www.avery. com , Utilisez le gabarit AVERYÂ® 5160Â® Sens de chargement ravaler le rebord Pop-upâ„¢ 1 1-800-GO-AVERY ' A /<04692 ......â€ž...._.JROYER,TROUSDALE _ 11| 46 TOWNHOMES Feet r-Â·.uzz~ CONDOASSOd' 9. r'11 F-7 5 HOPIatiS 1-PLAZA LLC 517, EAST l 'ASPEN "'* ~--601-Imys[FTrouÂ®ale __r~r-1 623 |16 1 L _r 25Â· ' 205 J This map/drawing/image is a graphical representation - AVENUE LLC .-1 U3 1 TownhomeB==r---0 , of the features depicted and is not a legal 204 Â· L-;601Â·East~ |611 ~ 615 ~ ASPEN'--IR 635 E S17 1 IBLOCK f HOPKINS ; representation. The accuracy may change ~ ''Hopkints~ ~ 199 LLC ~ LLC ~ depending on the enlargement or reduction. 601 EAS~T 1 Copyright 2013 Asper/Pitkin GIS HOPKINS ~-,1, 11 O h V CONDO ASSOC , 1 ~ 5/24/2013 10:56:06 AM C \GIS\temp\May13\300ft-601EHymanAve.mid M - -n- -..1.-11--- i .-- W - 7--- Z - ~ ~514 AH -0-7 r--m f Tamarawood 2 700 EAST - ~ 8 Pp E i~ LLC 1 1 610 EAST Bu~ng_1 41 HYMAN CONDO -.P CONDO hl HYMAN LEC Aki6 ~ PITKIN AS#OC ~ SJA , Center .COUNTY 620 lmEd 3 F r -- ~ ~ 4 I ASSOCIAT: 0 BANK 80% 2uILDING j.< il z~~~ la LLC | 534 ASPEN LLC 616 708 710 514 516 21-01=1 ~ 610 FURNGULF | 700 702 LTD -- '1 ==F~ 4 .190 Eist :6 -= _ -- - L - ,2-PITRIN I ~Il-rr-Â«TA~AL 9 1==1122 ===:Fhâ‚¬ -J CENTER! r.--1 -BERIP.L..1 |==~ CONDOASSOC--=--J -CONDO ASSOC / /: L E HYMAN AVE 1 ...300.SOUTH 1 ~ -7-521 300 1 | SPRING ST-~ 501 505 r' 601 A- ' | CONDOASSOC'f 1 637 1 *1-50 souuu ' 1 302 COX JAMES 625 ASPEN ART e-=11 01- ASI?ENCORE 4 05%931 E-17 E LIVING - VENTURES LLC ri MUSEUM 1.11 ' 747 L , 304 TRUST Â· i L 633 SPRING 308_29.8 11 LLC ~---11*ir HUNTER 1 308 LLC ~ i , L.1-1 19 -1 - ASPENHOF 112 DCGB LLC -11 N[Rf*SSOC-- 1 312 ~--~ | i i -11 BOOGIES ~ #Chateau i /--4 -1,0 1- 3 1 ~~~~~~ ~ 312 -1-:14 1 SIREET-1 314 CONDQASSOC BUILDING 0 Le 318 ili r-,34!rN ! ~ ASPEN LLC ; 2 HUNTER PLAZA ASSOCI~TES LLP ~Aspen-,+7 1 1 3, I fi, Mountain ~320 ~ i StrJet l,spenhof 520 534 1 1 ~ CHATEAU 1 |1.211.-62WUD44-706704 J---L,i ~ QUALIFIED RESIDENCES 1 1--ASPEN 'CONDO- f i ~000 602 620 / i:24 1 I ASSOC L BELL MOUNTAIN -- 4-4 / i / c E COOPER AVE 1 , f 601|605|607 609' 611&13 617 635'665 ~675 685 ~ f 402 Ispen , ASEEN GROVE 711 4 1 1 ASSOCIATES - -~fl Square | 411 L-=2=! Bowman' 409 ~08 1 - 40 Buildngl I I - 1116[i:~i- - 2=, Â·-NJ'STEIN ASPEN SQUARE .i. ~ ._... LLC 52.98% CONDO ASSOC -9. ~ OLD O -71 - ... . . Z: 1 1 - = ~VN37yg S J â‚¬h Date: November 26,2012 Project: 601 E Hyman City of Aspen Engineering Department DRC Comments These comments are not intended to be exclusive, but an initial response to the project packet submitted for purpose ofthe DRC meeting, Drainage: General note: The design for the site must meet the Urban Runoff Management Plan Requirements. Staff was not able to determine whether or not the site will meet these requirements. A full review will be completed when there is enough information to review. A compliant drainage plan must be submitted with a building permit application. This includes detaining and providing water quality for the entire site. If the site chooses FIL, it can only be applied to existing impervious areas all new areas will need to discharge at historic rates. Staff was unable to determine whether or not the site is able to meet all the Drainage Principals: 1.Consider stormwater quality needs early in the design process. The WOCI/ vault indicates stormwater treatment was considered. 2.Use the entire site when planning for stormwater quality treatment. 3.Avoid unnecessary impervious area. 4.Reduce runoff rates and volumes to more closely match natural conditions. 5.Integrate stormwater quality management and flood control. 6.Develop stormwater quality facilities that enhance the site, the community, and the environment. 7.Use a treatment train approach. 8.Design sustainable facilities that can be safely maintained. 9. Design and maintain facilities with public safety in mind. Sidewalk and Curb and Gutter: General note: All sidewalk, curb and gutter must meet the Engineering Standards as outlined in Title 21. A number of issues should be examined. This includes the following: 1. A direction ramp will be required. A directional ramp may interfere with the existing Type R stormwater inlet. The inlet may require modification. 2. A minimum walkway of 8 feet is required. 3. Use Silva Cells for tree plantings. Construction Management - Engineering is concerned about the Construction Impacts ofthis site. The plan shall describe mitigation for: parking, staging/encroachments, and truck traffic. Note that the current code does not allow for any encroachments during the on-seasons (November 1 -April 15 and June 1 - Labor Day). Excavation Stabilization - Due to the proximity of the neighboring property and the excavation of the building the City will require an excavation stabilization plan prior to building permit submittal. Fee in Lieu -This project is considered a Major project and can opt to pay the Fee in Lieu for a portion of the detention requirements. Please refer to Section 2.12.140 of the Municipal Code. Memorandum Date: June 25, 2012 To: Sara Nadolny, City of Aspen Planning From: Brian Flynn, Parks Department Re: Victorian Square, 601 E Hyman Landscaping within the Public Right of Way: Landscaping in the public right of way will be subject to landscaping in the ROW requirements, Chapter 21.20. There shall be no plantings within the City ROW which are not approved by the City Parks Department and the Engineering Department. For planting specifications within the streetscape, please refer to www.aspenpitkin.com on the Natural Resource page/tree care/right of way planting scenario 2. The applicant has suggested, and Parks supports, using Silva Cell technology for the sub-grade structure for the plantings and sidewalk. Parks supports using the same tree grates as those approved for the Muse building located next door. Parks also supports the suggested street tree species, maple and ash, but requires that the trees be grouped with like species. Parks supports the suggested variety of maple Acer x freemanii Celebration. Irrigation is required and the landscape plans should indentify irrigation source and design. Tree Permit: Per City Code 13.20 an approved tree permit will be required before any tree is removed or impacted under the drip line of the tree. Parks is requiring that the tree permit be approved prior to approval of building permits. If a permit is necessary, contact the Parks Department at 920-5120 or download the permit at www.aspenpitkin.com on the Natural Resource page, click on the 2012 tree permit tab. Mitigation for removals will be paid cash in lieu or as an on-site planting per City Code 13.20. Parks will approve a final landscape plan during the review of the tree removal permit based on the landscape estimates. ...1 RECE Â°=D APR 1 1 2013 COMMENITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT 4 Agreement to Pay Application Fees An agreement between the' City:of Aspen (tityÂ»yand Property Phdre No.: 970-925-1936 Owner ('<ID. Victotian Square, LLC Efrefit Address ofi BaUng Property:: 601 E. Hyman Avenue Address; 601 E. Hyman *venue (subject: of Aspen, CO 81611 (gend.bills here) Aspen, CO 8 1611 application) 1 understand thatilie:City hae adopted, via Owhiance No., Series bf 2011 j review fees far {.and Use applicationa and the payment df:ihese.fees:kÂ·a.tondition prece'dent to determining. apt,lidation completdness. 1 underitind that asÂ·the property: owner thal 1 am:*beeponsible for payingÂ·all fees lorth is developtem:;apt}licaton, For flatteesÂ·Â»dreferralÂ·feebil agree to pay thefoljowlfigfeesforthe servlces: indicated, l understand that these flat fees am nonirefuhdable. $ 650 flat feeÂ·for Parks '. 4 flat fee for . Â·Â· :EL-i For:deposit casesÂ·only: ~The' City and I understand #fat -because of the size, nalure or scome of the propÂ¢*ed projett, It is riot ;pos@ible.at thl#:time:tok.now the fullÂ»tent or total:80$14 Invol**d in'brocbsaing the:applk@tion. 1 ' Understand: that additional costs over Â®d abbve the deposit may accrile. 1 underetand and agree thaf:if is impracticable for City staff to compiete. proceasing, review, And Â·pmsentation of,wMdierit inforrnatioh to enable ~ i= tegally required findings to be made fer p.rojett dansiderationâ€žlinless invoices.areÂ·bald in full. ZU U.1 en W 2 The CityÂ·and I understand anci agree tbat invalce* majled 14.the City*19 Â·the above listed billing addAss and not ~ 0 returtied:to the City shallibe consitiered,by'the clly'as being received byme.1-:agree Â·to remil pay*'Ativithiri 30 - 4 4,~~ days ef presentatioh of ab Invoice by the City: for such Bervidea. W Z On I have th,d, understood, and agree to~*the Land, Vse,Reviev@ Fee Policy Inckidin@ consequences.for non-payment O- .Â» I agree to paothe following initial deposit amountsÂ·for thespecifiedfibers ofÂ·*taff time. 1 rinderstand thot paymâ€¢ht LU < of a deposit does nof tender anâ€ž sipplicallon corhplete 'orcombllant wIth'apbroval criteria. Â·If actual recoroed; costs / exceed the initial 84*sit, 1.agree td. payÂ· additional morithly billings toithe City to reimbur-40 the City for the processing dfmy applitationÂ·at the hbur*Mles'hereillafteitated: $ 4.550 depodit:for,. .14 haurs of"Commurtity'.Development.Defiaritarit stafftlme. Additional time above the de[Josit amoilntÂ·will be billed at $325**r hour. $ 265., depopit for 1. hours of Engiheering Del}artm@nt staff time. AddHibnal time above the.deposit amount willbe billedÂ·at $265.per.hour. City of Aspen: Propetty Owner: ChAs Be,idon Commonity Dave'lopihent Director NgÂ¢Aerlfhald Gatfiel~ L Victorian Square>LLC, 61.â‚¬Fk;Gdo limited Mbility company, City Use: '0 TitMf-liv: *dv Ma@;tef~nt. Inc.. a Colorado Corporation, Fees Duu; $ Â· Received: $ Manager ~--.t MArgi UL<J Ronald G,rfi0Â£ Rk,4 J:,titial t 2(93 3 .~ f.t ~ ~ irt > ~ ...'64441 .~ -'CIÂ·b; i ~ Â·C'inÂ·.t')f A.uniÂ· ; 134' S . 2,5,7\0'): 4,< r (';7Â¢j) 9,2~)-509() : â€¢Â» 02* 1 â‚¬44 5 Y 3 314,6- < ~22-CÂ»y- ... _*~72pl, ri.27 -/. - - -- - h - IN[Y'73 THE CrrY OF AspEN Land Use Application Determination of Completeness Date: April 19,2013 Dear City of Aspen Land Use Review Applicant, We have received your land use application and reviewed it for completeness. The case number and name assigned to this property is 0023.2013.ASLU - 601 E. Hyman, Final Commercial Design. The planner assigned to this case is Sara Nadolny. El Your Land Use Application is incomplete: Please submit the aforementioned missing submission items so that we may begin reviewing your application. No review hearings will be scheduled until all of the submission contents listed above have been submitted and are to the satisfaction of the City of Aspen Planner reviewing the land use application. ~R Your Land Use Application is complete: If there are not missing items listed above, then your application has been deemed complete to begin the land use review process. Other submission items may be requested throughout the review process as deemed necessary by the Community Development Department. Please contact me at 429-2759 if you have any questions. Thank You, AftÂ« (x-~ hlerinifer Ehelan, Deputy Director City of Aspen, Community Development Department For Office Use Only: Qualifying Applications: Mineral Rights Notice Required New SPA New PUD Yes- No-7~L Subdivision, SPA, or PUD (creating more than 1 additional lot) GMQS Allotments Residential Affordable Housing Yes - No._~_ Commercial E. P.F. 2-73'?l 92215961 0023 Â·20/3 ' As L{j 6 Permits file Edit Record Navigate Fem Repons Format Iab Â£!elp 4~4*24 li@,XputtlibejedÂ·liN 1 1 40@*Jumpl MIÂ®4 1 2 0 6 1 3 0 , 1. 3 6 A a 4,14 1 .,.. m 11- - \ ~ /Ming St@tus IFe,Â§ Fee Summary ~Actions Attachments Rou6ngHistory IMaluation Arch/Eng rCustom FjeldsuSub tennits Parc* 1 - ra -: ./.p. /;S*~~ -I'-I-'-/'I'..,3 ..1 8 Permit type -aslu I , Aspen Land Use [ Permit # 002]2013.ASLU r- -92 1 t~Smi"/'Ip ...- i. Address 601 E HYMAN AVE , Apt/Suite 4 City ASPEN . : - State F-71 ap 81612 ~~,~~ 1 Permit Informati ~ Master permit Routing queue aslu07 Applied 04/12/2013 â€¢ , I Proled Status pending v Approved f E Description APPLICATION FOR FIN,AL COMMERICAL DESIGN REVIEW - VICTORIA SQUARE Imled I. Closed/Final L s:ubmited ~STAN CLAUSEN 925 2323 1 414W 'Ui~ Days ~-11 9 8(pires ~04/07/2014 Ll ~ i n Owner â€ž ----1...:1â€ž-9--0....-'-/-'-i/.09.4.----7,- -1.' - Fl- -I. 4qâ€ž-1 i Last name VICTORLAN SQUARE. LLC I Â·1 First name 418 E COOPER AVE ~ 207 Phone ()- ...db.d,z.6*.*b..,, , Address ASPEN CO 81611 ell'll'll'll'll'lliwill# Â£ 1 ' I '. â€¢.. 1 -Irl' Applicant . Â® Owner is applicant? 0 Contractor is applicant? Last name VICTORIAN SQUARE, LLC First name ~418 E COOPERAVE Â·Â· Â· 207 Phone 11 ) - |Cust# |29263 | Arldrpqs JASPFN CO 81611 Lender Last name "Â· First name Phone () Address Displays the permit lendets address---- AspenGold5 (server' angelas'~, 1 of 1 ,:, ~*0~0~a;*/44......ow /4*4./Il â€ž g,Â»./.e 06 -0 1 86 4 AÂ·vek 5,4 65 -0-0 rkotlek *e -36 01- rp~Al\n~ 4,55-0'00 6,53 -00 EA O\ 84 5 - 00 M<'!nou xoqloo-41 s 1.=Z- 1 A 1.* 1 - C?V"--â€¢r. r APR 1 1 2013 FINAL COMMERCIAL DESIGN REVIEW APPLICATION CITY OF ASPEN COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT "601 East Hyman Avenue," a mixed-use commercial and residential development featuring commercial and office space, and one (1) free-market residential unit. 10 April 2013 Applicant: Victorian Square, LLC Location: 601 East Hyman Avenue, Aspen, Colorado - 7~.em-Fl~~IX-1-- h.41 11 24?12. . ~ ' ~ '" ' 'Jb'* . 44, .79:~*~im~ VIEW LOOKING SOUTHEAST An app#cation for F/ha/ Commercia/ Design Review under the Commercia/, Lodging, and Historic Design Objectives and Guide/ines for the Commercia/ Character Area. Represented By: ' i lill \ C STAN CLAUSON ASSOCIATES INC 6.11<2 landscape architecture.planning.resort design t. .- < 4/6. A . Â·F. 4% 412 North Mill Street Aspen, Colorado 81611 t. 970/925-2323 f. 970/920-1628 1 Â·Â·42 info@scaplanning.com www.scaplanning,com TABLE OF CONTENTS â€¢ Project Overview and Code Response â€¢ Attachment 2 - Land Use Application Form â€¢ Attachment 3 - Dimensional Requirements Form â€¢ Attachment 4 - Vicinity Map Parcel Detail Information â€¢ Attachment 5 - Existing Conditions Survey â€¢ Attachment 6 - Letter of Authorization â€¢ Attachment 7 - Proof of Ownership â€¢ Attachment 8 - Architectural Plans & Renderings â€¢ Attachment 9 - Previous Approvals â€¢ Attachment 10- Adjacent Property Owners â€¢ Attachment 11 - Pre-Application Conference Summary 601 East Hyman Application for Final Cornmercial Design Review PROJECT OVERVIEW The Site This application is submitted for final design review for a mixed-use development located on a portion of the three Townsite lots located on the southeast corner of Hunter Street and Hyman Avenue in the Commercial (C-1) zone district of the City of Aspen, Colorado. The property is located outside of the Commercial Core Historic District, the boundary of which is the western side of Hunter Street. The parcels do not fall within any delineated City of Aspen view planes and no variations are requested as a part of the application. The proposed project would replace the existing commercial building with a mixture of retail, office, and residential uses housed in an architecturally stunning building. The redevelopment of existing building would complete the redevelopment of the Hyman Avenue corridor extending from the downtown core. This redevelopment will include the new Aspen Art Museum, the Muse Building, the Aspen Core Building, and the preservation and restoration of the Benton Building. Previous Approvals Conceptual Commercial Design Review approval was granted for the proposed project by Resolution No. 19, Series 2012. Additionally, Growth Management and Subdivision Review for New Commercial and Free-market Residential Development approval were granted by Resolution No. 22, Series 2012. A prior condominium of the properly was vacated, meaning that no further subdivision review is required. Proposed Development The existing commercial building contains approximately 6,292 sq. ft. of net leasable space. The proposed project includes a small increase in commercial net leasable space pushing the total proposed net leasable to 7,317 sq. ft. The new building will feature a 1,908 sq. ft. free-market residential unit on the third floor. Generous deck space and the incorporation of green roof technology provide significant setbacks of the upper floors from the corner of Hunter and Hyman and at places along Hyman Avenue. The total proposed floor area to be located in the building is 9,304 sq. ft. This amount of proposed floor area is considerably less than the 11,250 sq. ft. allowable for this property in the C-1 zone district. Mitigation for additional development is proposed through the purchase of Affordable Housing Credits or off-site mitigation. Public amenity space was approved during Conceptual Review by the Planning & Zoning Commission at 562.5 sq. ft. Both sidewalks located off of Hyman and Hunter will be improved with a consistent allee of street trees. Other amenities such as benches and landscaping will complete a pleasant pedestrian experience. Architecture This visually arresting but compatible approach employed in the design of the building will ensure that the building will be well received by the community and an appropriate addition to an already exciting block. The building is composed of three modules that approximate the widths of traditional townsite lots. Large windows, highly visible storefronts, use of visually interesting materials, and areas of public amenity space, which will invite pedestrians to interact with the architecture of the building, are incorporated into all three modules. Detailed features of the three modules include: â€¢ The two story module located on the corner of Hunter and Hyman will feature a dynamic and attractive storefront which will engage pedestrians walking down both Hunter and 601 East Hyman Avenue Application for Final Commercial Design Review 10 April 2013 Page 1 Hyman. The two story corner element will also anchor the corner and represent an important element to pedestrians passing from the other buildings on the block and other important pedestrian amenities such as Gondola Plaza to the south. â€¢ The three story element provides a strong street wall for the south side of Hyman Avenue. A series of entrances off of Hyman Avenue, enhanced with benches and landscaping, will allow the building and pedestrians to flow down the block. The result will be the creation of a pedestrian environment which will lead pedestrians down the block to the future Art Museum Building. The three story module features an overhang which will conform to the dimensional limitations imposed during the Conceptual review. The overhang will frame the store front windows below and create a separation from the ground floor from the upper floors. Finally, the overhang will provide an area for pedestrians to pause out of the elements. â€¢ The third module, which houses the main entrance for the second and third floor uses, meets the neighboring structure, fostering the street wall effect that has been established in the neighboring structure. The third floor over the entry has been set back from the Hyman Avenue fagade, reducing the mass and scale of the building. A green roof has been provided over the entry way. We look forward to working with staff and presenting this exceptional project to the Planning and Zoning Commission. 601 East Hyman Avenue Application for Final Commercial Design Review 10 April 2013 Page 2 Commercial, Lodging, and Historic District Design Objectives and Guidelines Commercial Character Area. This area forms the immediate fringe of much of the Commercial Core Historic District. DESIGN OBJECTIVES These are key design objectives for the Commercial Area. The City mustfind that any new work will help to meet them: 1. Strengthen the sense ofrelatedness with the Commercial Core Historic District. Strengthening the definition ofthe street edge in a manner similar to the Commercial Core is desired. At the same time, the Commercial Area is a place where more variety in design is encouraged. Imitating historic styles is not an objective, but re-establishing a sense of a strongerfundamentalframework will enhance the urban qualities Of this area and is a priority. The fagade on the proposed new building has received significant redesign from the Conceptual Commercial Design Review. The redesigned building will enhance the sense of relatedness between the Commercial Core Historic District and other significant elements such as Gondola Plaza and the new Aspen Art Museum. Responding to staff's direction, the building will provide a strong definition of the street edge and will feature large display windows on the ground level that will draw pedestrian interest along both the Hyman Avenue and Hunter Street corridors. 2. Maintain a retail orientation. Greater retail presence at the street edge should be achieved to ensure an enhanced street vitality and an enriched and more urban definition of the commercial street frontage. In addition to providing basement commercial space, the proposed project, while not required to provide ground floor retail, anticipates providing additional retail space on the ground floor. This space will be accessible from both Hyman Avenue and Hunter Street. 3. Promote creative, contemporary design. Designs should seek creative new solutions that convey the community's continuing interest in exploring innovations. At the same time, the fundamental principles of traditional design must be respected. This means that each project should strike a balance in the design variables that are presented in the following pages. The proposed design of the building, which has incorporated many of the suggestions voiced by staff and the Planning and Zoning Commission during the Conceptual review, continues to utilize a contemporary and innovative approach which features artistic and natural forms that will complement other new development on this block. While highly creative and being a building "of its time," the proposed building is respectful of traditional development within the area and will utilize materials that are compatible with the traditional building materials used in the City. The building will be sited orthogonally on the site, again in compliance with traditional development patterns in the central core. 4. Encourage a well-defined street wall 601 East Hyman Avenue Application for Final Cornmercial Design Review 10 April 2013 Page 3 The intent is to more clearly establish a strongly defined street wall, but with some greater variety than in the Commercial Core Historic District since the historic buitding edge is not as dejined. A stronger street farade definition should be achieved while at the same time recognizing the value of public dining and landscaped space. The proposed design has incorporated many of the comments provided by staff and the Planning and Zoning Commission, particularly with regards to providing a well-defined street wall. The Applicants feel that the strong fagade along Hyman Avenue which features an overhang, coupled with the useful and interesting public amenity spaces, create a memorable addition to the corner of Hunter and Hyman. Variations in height, use of significant building elements, and attractive building materials bolster the vitality of an exciting streetscape in the making. The urban streetscape will be improved by the addition of street trees and other landscaping embellishments. 5. Reflect the variety in building heights seen traditionally. It is important that a range and variation in building height and scale in the Commercial Area be recognized in future development. Larger buildings should be varied in height and reflect original lot widths. The proposed building utilizes two and three-story elements which are varied to reflect - original lot widths. The two-story element immediately adjacent to the corner of Hunter and Hyman and the three-story element on Hyman provide variation from the orientation of the other buildings located on this block which features the Aspen Art Museum's uniform building height and the Muse Building's three stories with a significant third floor setback. 6. Accommodate outdoor public spaces while establishing a clear dejinition to the street edge. Providing space in association with individual buildings remains important, but should be balanced with much greater building street presence and corner dejinition. The pedestrian amenity space responds to the suggestions provided by staff and the Planning and Zoning Commission from the Conceptual Commercial Design Review process. The proposed public amenity space will ensure that a significant street presence and corner definition is maintained. 7. Promote variety in the street level experience. Display cases, architectural details and landscaping are among the design elements that should be used. Display windows, architectural details which incorporate areas of landscaping and benches, and interesting materials have been incorporated into the design to promote variety in the street level experience. Pavement variation will contribute to the pedestrian experience. FINAL REVIEW DESIGN GUIDELINES The following design guidelines shall apply at the final review stage: 1.29 A new building shall reflect the traditional lot width (30 ft.) as expressed by two or more of the following: â€¢Variation in height at internal lot lines â€¢ Variation in the plane ofthefront fagade â€¢ Street fagade composition â€¢ Variation in architectural detailing and materials to emphasize the building module 601 East Hyman Avenue Application for Final Commercial Design Review 10 April 2013 Page 4 Traditional lot widths are expressed by the width of the three rnodules of the building. The provision of front fagade elements which "bump out," the use of difference materials and architectural detailing that emphasize building modules, and significant setbacks of upper floors also reinforce the perception that the building approximates traditional lot widths. 1.30 The detailed designofthe building faÂ¢adeshould ref!ect thetraditionalscale andrhythm of the block. This should be achieved using all of the following: â€¢ The fenestration grouping â€¢ The modeling ofthefaÂ¢ade â€¢ The designframeworkfor the first floor storefront â€¢ Variation in architectural detail and/or the palette offaeade materials The detailed design elements and materials contained in the proposed building fagade provide a unique compliment to the scale and rhythm of the existing buildings located on the block. The proposed fenestration aligns with neighboring properties' fenestration, utilizing similar or compatible shapes, and detailed design elernents. The repetition of various fagade elements and materials in the proposed building support a sense of rhythm on the street and creates a design framework for the first floor storefronts. 1.31 A building should rejlect the architectural hierarchy and articulation inherent in the composition of the street favade. The following should be addressed: â€¢ The design and definition of the traditionally tall first.floor â€¢ The vertical proportions of the upper level fenestration pattern and ratio of solid wall to window area. The first floor of the proposed building emphasizes the traditionally tall first floor by making the storefront windows the focus of the facade. The tall storefront windows, which will provide exceptional interest to pedestrians, occupy the majority of the first level. Complementing the glazing on the first level, the second and third story windows react to the first story proportions while complimenting neighboring buildings ratio of solid wall to window area. Considered as an ensemble, the four new buildings in the immediate vicinity (Aspen Art Museum, the Muse Building, the proposed Victorian Square, and the Aspen Core Building) will create a very exciting block which exemplifies the desire in Aspen for architecture to be "of its time" with an eye to our past. 1.32 A building should reflect the three dimensional characteristics of the street faÂ¢ade in the strength and depth of modeling, Jenestration and architectural detail. Employing an interesting interplay of volume and detailing, the three dimensional characteristics of the street fagade will engage pedestrians and anchor the Hunter/Hyman intersection. By pulling certain elements out towards the street and pushing other elements back to meet neighboring fagades, the proposed building initiates the block rhythm which will culminate with the Art Museum. 1.33 Any new building shaN be designed to maintain a minimum of 9 feetfrom floor to ceiling on all floors. The proposed building will have floor to ceiling heights of 13 feet on the first floor, and 11 feet on the second and third floors. 1.34 Maintain the distinction between the street level and upper floors. 601 East Hyman Avenue Application for Final Commercial Design Review 10 April 2013 Page 5 â€¢ The firstfloor should be the tallestfloor to floor height in the building. â€¢ The firstfloor of the primary faÂ¢ade should be predominantly transparent glass. â€¢ Upper floors should be perceived as being more opaque than the street level. Upper story windows should have a vertical emphasis. â€¢ Highly reflective or darkly tinted glass is inappropriate. â€¢ Express the traditional distinction infloor heights between street levels and upper levels through detailing, materials andfenestration. The presence ofa belt course is an important feature in this relationship. The first floor of the proposed building, with a 13 foot floor to ceiling height, will be the tallest floor in the building. The second and third stories have 11 foot floor to ceiling heights. The dominant feature of the first floor will be the nearly uninterrupted glass fagade which will provide unimpeded views into the commercial spaces. The upper story windows, while having a very strong vertical emphasis, and are smaller and will show less of the interior space on the second floors. By doing this, the first story of windows will receive the most attention. Highly reflective glass and darkly tinted glass will not be used in the building. By implementing an overhang over the first story on the main fagade module, a strong distinction is created between the street level and the upper levels of the building. Landscape elements on the street level will further cause a pedestrian's attention to be drawn to the street level. 1.35 A new building should be designed to maintain the stature of traditional street level retailfrontage. â€¢ This should be 13-15 fL in -floor tofloor height on the first.floor. â€¢ The minimum required first jloor height must be maintained for at least the first 50 foot depth of the lot, and may only be dropped to u lower height beyond that point for areas that are devoted to storage, circulation, offices, restaurant kitchens, alley commercial spaces, or similar secondary uses. The proposed building features a 13 foot floor to ceiling height the entire depth of the lot. 1.36 Minimize the appearance of a tall third floor. â€¢ Where a third floor's floor to ceiling height is in excess of 12 ft., it should be set back a minimum of 15 ft. from the street faÂ¢ade to reduce the apparent height. â€¢ Increase the parapet height to screen the visual impact of a tai! top floor. â€¢ The design of a setback third jloor shaN be simpler in form, more subdued in modeling, detail and color than the primary faÂ¢ade. The third story floor height will be 11 feet, less than the threshold set by this guideline to require a setback. The proposed building features modules of two and three stories. As seen from the Hunter Street facade. the third story will not be visible due to the very - significant setback of the third story from Hunter Street. On the Hyman Avenue fagade, only the middle of three modules will contain a third story that extends to the Hyman Avenue fagade. The module adjacent to the neighboring three story building employs a generous setback to the third story. 1.37 The jirst jloorfaÂ¢ade should be designed to concentrate interest at the street level, using the highest quality of design, detailing and materials. â€¢ A strong and distinctively designed retail framework for the first jloor of the building. â€¢ An entryway designed to use the full height of the storefront â€¢ A distinct change in the palette of materials used for the first floor design framework. â€¢ The depth and strength of the modeling of elements and details. 601 East Hyman Avenue Application for Final Commercial Design Review 10 April 2013 Page 6 The first floor fagade is primarily made up of windows. Unique detailing at entry points provides visual interest and directs pedestrians to the commercial entrances. Complimentary landscape areas and well as benches, which are located under the overhang, will allow pedestrians to pause in front of the retail windows. The overhang provides a very strong ordering element, setting off the first floor fagade. 1.38 The retail entrance should be at the sidewalk level â€¢ AH entrances shall be ADA compliant â€¢ On sloping sites the retailfrontage should be as close to a level entrance as possible. All entrances to the commercial spaces are located immediately adjacent to the sidewalk and all entrances will be fully ADA compliant. The subject site does not slope and all entrances will be level with the sidewalk. 1.39 Incorporate an airlock entry into the plan for all new structures. â€¢ An airlock entry that projects forward of the primary faÂ¢ade at the sidewaik edge is inappropriate. â€¢ Adding temporary entries during the winter season detracts from the character of the historic districL â€¢ Using a temporary vinyl or fabric "airlock" to provide protection from winter weather is not permitted. No airlocks project forward of the primary facade of the building. A recessed airlock is provided for the midblock entrance on Hyman Avenue, which will provide access to all elements of the building. Airlocks on the commercial entrances on the first floor space are not appropriate, as access to the commercial space should be unimpeded. 1.40 Window area along the jirst jloor shaN be a minimum of 60% of exterior street farade area when facing principal street(s). Window area along the first floor will be more than 60% of the exterior street fagade when facing Hyman Avenue, the principal street facade. 1.41 Where appropriate a building shall be designed to maintain the character and transparency of the traditional street level retail frontage. The proposed building will feature large windows which will provide direct views into the commercial spaces beyond. The large windows ensure that commercial spaces will provide interest to pedestrians. 1.42 Design of the first floor storefront should include particular attention to the following: â€¢ The basic elements and proportions of storefront design â€¢ Depth and strength of modeling â€¢ The palette of materials and finishes used in both the structural framework and the storefront window â€¢ The concentration of architectural detail to ensure a rich visual experience â€¢ The complementary use of signage and lettering to enhance the retail and downtown character â€¢ The use of lighting to accentuate visual presence The predominantly glazed first floor commercial storefronts are the focal point of the building. The overhanging second floor on the center module frames the commercial spaces and creates an inviting environment for pedestrians. Landscape treatments and varying materials cause the commercial spaces to become the focus of the facade. Signage and lettering employed will be compatible to the design of the building and compatible with downtown character. Site lighting, which will comply with appropriate lighting standards, will be utilized to accentuate the visual presence of the building. 601 East Hyman Avenue Application for Final Commercial Design Review 10 April 2013 Page 7 1.43 Retail frontage facing onto side courts or rear alleys should follow similar design principles to the street frontage, adjusted for the scale of the space. â€¢ It should be designed with a similar attention to architectural articulation, detail and materials. â€¢ These should have a richness of detail that is inviting to users. No retail frontage is proposed to face side courts or rear alleys. 1.44 A larger building shouid reflect thetraditional lotwidth in the form and variation ofits roof. Thisshould be achieved through the following: â€¢ A set back of the top floor from the front faÂ¢ade â€¢ Rejlect the traditional lot width in the roof plane By utilizing modules, the proposed building will not appear to be one large building but rather three buildings immediately adjacent to each other as was common in the Victorian period. The width of the modules is very similar to traditional lot widths. Moreover, one of the modules will be two-story while the other module will be predominantly three stories, further breaking the mass of the building up and causing the building to appear to mirnic traditional lot widths. 1.45 The roofscape should be designed with the same design attention as the secondary elevations of the building. â€¢ Group and screen mechanical units from view. â€¢ Locate mechanical equipment to the rear of the roof area. â€¢ Position, articulate and design rooftop enclosures or structures to reflect the modulation and character of the building. â€¢ Use materials which complement the design of the building faÂ¢ades. â€¢ Design roof garden areas to be unobtrusive from the street. â€¢ Use 'green roof design best practice, where feasible. The roofscape, which features rnany instances of green roofs, has been designed with the same design attention as the other elevations of the building. The majority of mechanical equipment will be located in the basement with only minimal elements, such as the required elevator overrun, located on the roof. 1.46 High quality, durable materials should be employed. â€¢ The palette of materials should be specijied, including samples of materials as required. High quality, durable materials have been employed. The architectural plans call out the various materials and samples are available for review. 1.47 Building materials should have these features: â€¢ Convey the quality and range of materials seen traditionally â€¢ Reduce the perceived scale of the building and enhance visual interest of the facade â€¢ Convey a human scale â€¢ Have proven durability and weathering characteristics within Aspen's climate The highly attractive materials employed convey a subtlety which will be complimentary to the surrounding block. The materials mimic other materials which have been traditionally been used in the City and have been employed in such a way so as to convey visual interest to pedestrians. The materials also are of an appropriate scale for pedestrians which will not over power the interesting interplay of volumes being explored, 601 East Hyman Avenue Application for Final Commercial Design Review 10 April 2013 Page 8 1.48 A building or additions should reflect the quality and variation in materials seen traditionally. The proposed building reflects the quality and variation in materials seen traditionally but also is a building of its time and uses modern materials and techniques of installation. 1.49 Where contemporary materials are used they shall be: â€¢ High quality in durability and finish â€¢ Detailed to convey a human scale â€¢ Compatible with a traditional masonry palette The modern aesthetic of the building will be supported by high quality materials chosen for their durability. The materials are detailed to convey a strong human scale. The brick lap siding, wood finishes, and laminate panels, are compatible features to the traditional material palette found throughout the City. 1.50 Materials used for third floor accommodation set back from the street favadefs) should be more subdued than the primary faÂ¢a{les. The setbacks, while not required as the upper floors are 11 feet floor to ceiling, are very significant so that upper level elements will not be visible from street level. The modern aesthetic of the building employs an already subdued material palette which will be continued in the third floor fagade. 1.51 Paving and landscaping should be designed to complement and enhance the immediate setting of the building and area. Paving and landscape features compliment and reinforce the elements of the proposed building and will also be compatible with neighboring structures. 601 East Hyman Avenue Application for Final Commercial Design Review 10 April 2013 Page 9 Land Use Code Sections CHAPTER 26.412 COMMERCIAL DESIGN REVIEW Sec. 26.412.050. Review criteria. An application for commercial design review may be approved, approved with conditions or denied based on conformance with the following criteria: A. The proposed development meets the requirements of Section 26.412.060, Commercial design standards, or any deviation from the standards provides a more appealing pattern of development considering the context in which the development is proposed and the purpose of the particular standard. Unique site constraints can justify a deviationfrom the standards. Compliance with Section 26.412.070, Suggested design elements, is not required but may be used to justify a deviationfrom the standards. The proposed project complies with the requirements of Section 26.412.60 and no deviations are sought from the commercial design standards. To the extent possible, the proposed project will follow the general guidelines suggest by the City as contained in Sec. 26.412.070: Suggested Design Elements. B. For proposed development converting an existing structure to commercial use, the proposed development meets the requirements of Section 26.412.060, Commercial design standards, to the greatest extent practical. Changes to the favade of the building may be required to compty with this Section. The proposed project contemplates the demolition of the existing commercial building and the construction of a new mixed-use building, which will include commercial and free market residential. No elements of the existing building will be retained and the exterior design of the proposed building will be significantly different from the existing structure. C. The application shall comply with the guidelines within the Commercial, Lodging and Historic District Design Objectives and Guidelines as determined by the appropriate Commission. The guidelines set forth design review criteria, standards and guidelines that are to be used in making determinations of appropriateness. The City shall determine when a proposal is in compliance with the criteria, standards and guidelines. Although these criteria, standards and guidelines are relatively comprehensive, there may be circumstances where alternative ways of meeting the intent of the policy objectives might be identified. In such a case, the City must determine that the intent of the guideline is stiN met, albeit through alternative means. The proposed project is submitted for Commercial Design Review by the Planning & Zoning Commission. The proposed project complies with the Commercial, Lodging, and Historic District Design Objectives and Guidelines and specifically the "Commercial Character Area" Chapter contained therein. Sec. 26.412.060. Commercial design standards. The following design standards, in addition to the commercial, lodging and historic district design objectives and guidelines, shall appty to commercial, lodging and mixed-use development: A. Public amenity space. Creative. well-designed public places and settings contribute to an attractive, exciting and vital downtown retail district and a pleasant pedestrian shopping and entertainment atmosphere. Public amenity can take the form ofphysical or operational improvements to public rights-of-way or private property within commercial areas. 601 East Hyman Avenue Application for Final Commercial Design Review 10 April 2013 Page 10 Existing public amenity space consists of approximately 595 sq. ft. The proposed project provides 532.5 sq. ft. (12.5% of lot area) of public amenity space. This amount of public amenity space conforms to the conditions of approval contained in Resolution No. 19, Series 2012 which approved Conceptual Commercial Design. On parcels required to provide public amenity, pursuant to Section 26.575.030, Public amenity, the following standards shall apply to the provision of such amenity. Acceptance of the method or combination of methods of providing the public amenity shall be at the option of the Planning and Zoning Commission or the Historic Preservation Commission, as applicable, according to the procedures herein and according to the following standards: 1. The dimensions of any proposed on-site public amenity sufficiently allow for a variety ofuses and activities to occur, considering any expected tenant and future potential tenants and uses. The proposed on-site public amenity space will provide a landscaped pedestrian amenity that supports the continuity of the pedestrian corridor for the commercial core to the new Art Museum. Benches, areas of landscaping, and a consistent all*e of street trees will engage pedestrians and provide an area for casual gatherings. 2. The public amenity contributes to an active street vitality. To accomplish this characteristic, public seating, outdoor restaurant seating or similar active uses, shade trees, solar access, view orientation and simple at-grade relationships with adjacent rights-of-way are encouraged. The proposed public amenity space will contribute to an active street vitality. The public amenity space includes benches, areas of landscaping and a consistent all*e of street trees. Solar access, view orientation, and simple at-grade relationships with the adjacent rights-of-way have been utilized to the maximum extent possible. 3. The public amenity and the design and operating characteristics of adjacent structures, rights-of-way and uses contribute to an inviting pedestrian environment The proposed public amenity space, featuring benches, areas of landscaping, and a consistent all*e of street trees, incorporates the design and operating characteristics of the adjacent structures. The two story module on the corner will provide a pedestrian scaled element that pedestrian will be drawn to and which will serve as an entrance elernent to the block containing the Aspen Art Museum. 4. The proposed amenity does not duplicate existing pedestrian space created by mails, sidewalks or adjacent property, or such duplication does not detract from the pedestrian environment. The public amenity space will enhance the relationship between the public sidewalk and the proposed building, providing pedestrians a one-of-a-kind opportunity to interact with the volumes of the building. 5. Any variationto thedesign andoperational standards for public amenity, Subsection 26.575.030.F., promotes the purpose ofthe public amenity requirements. The proposed project provides 532.5 sq. ft. (12.5% of lot area) of public amenity space. This amount of public amenity space conforms to the conditions of approval contained in Resolution No. 19, Series 2012 which approved Conceptual Commercial Design. The slight reduction of public amenity space required was approved at Conceptual Review 601 East Hyman Avenue Application for Final Commercial Design Review 10 April 2013 Page 11 as the space below the overhanging section of fagade were determined to be unique to Aspen and were elements the Commission members felt contributed to the pedestrian vitality of the City. B. Utility, delivery and trash service provision. When the necessary logistical elements of a commercial building are well designed, the building can better contribute to the overall success of the district Poor logistics of one (1) building can detract from the quality of surrounding properties. Efficient delivery and trash areas are important to the function of alleyways. The following standards shall apply: 1. A utility, trash and recycle service area shall be accommodated along the tilley meeting the minimum standards established by Section 26.575.060, Utility/trash/recycle service areas, unless otherwise established according to said Section. The project does not have alley access in which utility, trash, and recycling service areas can be accommodated. A plan for the utility, trash, and recycling service area has been provided and comments returned by the Environmental Health Department for the City of Aspen. Generally, Environmental Health has said the trash area layout is "good" and the "space looks useable." The utility, trash, and recycling service areas will be located off of Hunter Street in a similar area as the existing building. 2. Allutility servicepedestals shallbe located on privateproperty and atong the alley. Easements shaN allow for service provider access. Encroachments into the alleyway shall be minimized to the extent practical and should only be necessary when existing site conditions, such as an historic resource, dictate such encroachment. All encroachments shall be properly licensed. The proposed project does not have alley frontage. An existing electrical service transformer will be retained on the property in approximately its present location for which an easement currently exists. Any additional utility service pedestals will be located on private property. No encroachments are proposed as part of this application. 3. Delivery service areas shall be incorporated along the alley. Any truck loading facility shall be an integral component ofthe building. Sharedfacilities are highly encouraged. The proposed project does not have alley access and will not have a truck loading facility, with the exception of the trash and recycling facility. 4. Mechanical exhaust, including parking garage ventilation, shall be vented through the roof. The exhaust equipment shall be located as far away from the street as practical Any mechanical exhaust will be vented through the roof and located as far away from the street as practical. The proposed project will not include a garage. 5. Mechanical ventilation equipment and ducting shall be accommodated internally within the building and/or located on the roof, minimized to the extent practical and recessed behind a parapet wall or other screening device such that it shall not be visible from a public right-of-way at a pedestrian level. New buildings shall reserve adequate space for future ventilation and ducting needs. Mechanical ventilation equipment and ducting will be accommodated internally within the building and located on the roof, will Â·be minimized to the extent practical, and recessed behind a parapet wall or other screening device such that it shall not be visible 601 East Hyman Avenue Application for Final Commercial Design Review 10 April 2013 Page 12 from a public right-of-way at a pedestrian level. The proposed project will reserve adequate space for future ventilation and ducting needs. Sec. 26.412.070. Suggested design elements. The following guidelines are building practices suggested by the City, but are not mandatory. In many circumstances, compliance with these practices may not produce the most desired development, and project designers should use their best judgment. A. Signage. Signage should be integrated with the building to the extent possible. Integrated signage areas already meeting the City's requirements for size, etc., may minimize new tenant signage compliance issues. Common tenant listing areas also serves a public way-finding function, especially for office uses. Signs should not block design details of the building on which they are placed. Compliance with the City's sign code is mandatory. No signage is proposed at this time. Future signage will be integrated into the building in areas provide through the fagade design. Tenant listing areas will be included for second floor uses. Signs will not block details of the building and will conform to the requirements of the City sign code. B. Display windows. Display windows provide pedestrian interest and can contribute to the success of the retail space. Providing windows that reveal inside activity of the store can provide this pedestrian interest. A significant amount of display windows will be provided on the ground level for ground- floor tenant uses in the proposed project. C. Lighting. Well-lit (meaning quality, not quantity) display windows along thefirst floor create pedestrian interest after business hours. Dynamic lighting methods designed to catch attention can cheapen the quality of the downtown retail environment. Illuminating certain important building elements can provide an interesting effect. Significant light trespass should be avoided. Iliuminating the entire building should be avoided. Compliance with the City's Outdoor lighting code, Section 26.575.150 of this Title, is mandatory. Certain important building elements of the proposed project may be illuminated to provide an interesting effect. Light trespass will be avoided. The proposed project will comply with the City's Outdoor Lighting Code. A detailed lighting plan has been provided with this Final Commercial Design Review. 601 East Hyman Avenue Application for Final Commercial Design Review 10 April 2013 Page 13 Chapter 26.610 Impact Fees 26.610.020. Applicability. Unless expressly exempted, the Park Development impact fee and the Transportation Demand Management (TDM)/Air Quality impact fee shall be assessed upon all development within the City which contains residential floor area or net leasable commercial space. The Applicant commits to pay any and all impact fees associated with the new residential floor area and net leasable floor area. Impact fees are provisionally calculated as follows: â€¢ Park Development: o Residential - 1,908 sq. ft. x $5.45 = $10,338.60 o Commercial - 1,025 sq. ft. x $4.10 = $4,202.50 â€¢ TDM/Air Quality: o Residential - 1,908 sq. ft. x $.61 = $1,163.88 o Commercial - 1,025 sq. ft. x $.46 = $471.50 Chapter 26.620 School Land Dedication 26.620.020. Applicability. Unless expressly exempted, the school land dedication standard shall be assessed upon all development within the City which contains residential dwelling units. The Applicant commits to paying the School Land Dedication fees associated with the new residential dwelling unit. The School Land dedication fee is provisionally calculated as follows: Floor Area Students Generated 1,908 sq. ft. (first 1,200 sq. ft. x .000064) .077 (next 708 sq. ft. x .000404) .286 Total Student Generation .363 Land Dedication Calculation 896 sq. ft. x .363 = 325 sq. ft. Cash-In-Lieu $1,509,450.00/4,500 sq. ft. x 325 sq. ft. x .33 = $35,975.22 601 East Hyman Avenue Application for Final Commercial Design Review 10 April 2013 Page 14 Commercial (C-1) Zone District 26.710.150. Commercial (C-1). A. Purpose. The purpose of the Commercial (C-1) Zone District is to provide for the establishment of mixed-use buildings with commercial uses on the ground floor and opportunities for affordable and free-market residential density. A transition between the commercial core and surrounding residential neighborhoods has been implemented through a slight reduction in allowable floor area as compared to the commercial core, the ability to occupy the ground jloor with o.ffices, and a separate chapter in the commercial design guidelines. The project represents a mixed-use building with commercial on the first and second floors and free-market residential on the third floor. The project contains less floor area ) than what would be allowable in the C-1 and is in compliance with the "Commercial Character Area" chapter of the Commercial Lodging, and Historic District Design Objectives and Guide/ines. B. Permitted uses. Thefollowing uses are permitted as of right in the Commercial (C-1) Zone District: 1. Uses allowed on upper .floors: Lodging, affordable multi-family housing,free-market multi-family housing and home occupations. The project contains free-market multi-family housing on the third floor. 2. Uses allowed on all building levels: Retail and restaurant uses, neighborhood commercial uses, service uses, office uses, arts, cultural and civic uses, public uses, recreational uses, academic uses, child care center, bed and breakfast, accessory uses and structures, uses and building elements necessary and incidental to uses on other floors, including parking accessory to a permitted use, storage accessory to a permitted use, farmers' market, provided that a vending agreement is obtained pursuant to Section 15.04.350(14 Parking shall not be allowed as the sole use ofthe ground floor. The project contains commercial and office uses on the basement, first, and second floors. C. Conditional uses. The following uses are permitted as conditional uses in the Commercial (C-1) Zone District, subject to the standards and procedures established in Chapter 26.425: 1. Lodging, affordable multi-family housing, free-market multi-family housing or home occupations on the ground floor. 2. Commercial parking facility, pursuant to Section 26.515. 3. For historic landmark properties: Detached residential dwelling, two (2) detached residential dwellings and duplex dwelling. No conditional uses of the Commercial (C-1) zone district are contemplated in the proposed project. D. Dimensional requirements. The following dimensional requirements shall apply to all permitted and conditional uses in the Commercial (C-1) Zone District: 1. Minimum Gross Lot Area (square feet): a. Detached residential dwelling, two (2) detached residential dwellings, duplex dwelling and bed and breakfast: 3,000. b. AH other uses: No requirement. 601 East Hyman Avenue Application for Final Commercial Design Review 10 April 2013 Page 15 The project will contain only commercial, office and free-market, multi- family uses. The minimum gross lot area requirernent does not apply. 2. Minimum Net Lot Area per dwelling unit (square feet): a. Detached residential dwelling, two (2) detached residential dwellings, duplex dwelling and bed and breakfast: Same as R-6 Zone District b. All other uses: No requirement. The project contains only commercial, office and free-market, multi-family uses. The minimum net lot area per dwelling unit requirement does not apply. 3. Minimum lot width (feet): a. Detached residential dwelling, two (2) detached residential dwellings, duplex dwelling and bed and breakfast: Same as R-6 Zone District b. All other uses: No requirement. The project contains only commercial, office and free-market, multi-family uses. The minimum lot width requirement does not apply. 4. Minimum front yard setback (feet): a. Detached residential dwelling, two (2) detached residential dwellings, duplex dwelling and bed and breakfast: Same as R-6 Zone District. b. All other uses: No requirement. The project contains only commercial, office and free-market, multi-family uses. The minimum front yard setback requirement does not apply. 5. Minimum side yard setback (feeO: a. Detached residential dwelling, two (2) detached residential dwellings, duplex dwelling and bed and breakfast: Same as R-6 Zone District b. All other uses: No requirement. The project contains only commercial, office and free-market, multi-family uses. The minimum side yard setback requirement does not apply. 6. Minimum rear yard setback (feet): a. Detached residential dwelling, two (2) detached residential dwellings, duplex dwelling and bed and breakfast: Same as R-6 Zone District. b. All other uses: No requirement The project contains only commercial, office and free-market, multi-family uses. The minimum rear yard setback requirement does not apply. 7. Minimum utility/trash/recycle area: Pursuant to Section 26.575.060. The property does not have alley access. Pursuant to Sec. 26.575.060, "Utility/trash/recycle service areas," for properties that do not have alley access, the minimum utility/trash/recycle area requirement does not apply. A utility/trash/recycle area has been provided on the southwest corner of the building, with access onto Hunter Street. This is the same as the current location 601 East Hyman Avenue Application for Final Commercial Design Review 10 April 2013 Page 16 for this facility in the existing building. The utility/trash/recycle area has been reviewed by Environmental Health and found to be "useable." 8. Maximum height: a. Detached residential dwelling, two (2) detached residential dwellings, duplex dwelling and bed and breakfast: Same as R-6 Zone District b. All other uses: twenty-eight (28) feet for two-story elements of a building. Thirty-six (36) feet for three-story elements of a building, which may be increased to forty (40) feet through commercial design review. See Chapter 26.412. The proposed project will contain only commercial, office and free- market, multi-family uses. The maximum proposed height of the building will be thirty-six (36) feet. 9. Minimum distance between buildings on the lot (feet): a. Detached residential dwelling, two (2) detached residential dwellings, duplex dwelling and bed and breakfast: Same as R-6 Zone District b. All other uses: No requirement. The proposed project will contain only commercial, office and free- market, multi-family uses. The minimum distance between buildings on the lot requirement does not apply. 10. Public amenity space: Pursuant to Section 26.575.030. Existing public amenity space consists of approximately 595 sq. ft. The proposed project provides 532.5 sq. ft. (12.5% of lot area) of public amenity space. This amount of public amenity space conforms to the conditions of approval contained in Resolution No. 19, Series 2012 which approved Conceptual Commercial Design. 11. Floor area ratio (FAR): The following FAR schedule applies to uses cumulatively up to a total maximum FAR of 2.5:1. Achieving the maximum floor area ratio is subject to compliance with applicable design standards, view plane requirements, public amenity requirements and other dimensional standards. Accordingly, the maximum FAR is not an entitlement and is not achievable in atl situations. Maximum cumulative floor area for the property is 11,250 sq. ft. or a ratio 2.50: 1. The proposed cumulative floor area for the project will be 2.07:1 or 9,304 sq. ft. a. Commercial uses: 1.5:1. Maximum commercial floor area for the property is 6,750 sq. ft. or a ratio of 1.5:1. The proposed comrnercial floor area for the project will be 1.29:1 or 5,822 sq. ft. b. Arts, cultural and civic uses, public uses, recreational uses, academic uses, child care center and similar uses: 2.5:1. No arts, cultural and civic, public uses, recreational uses, academic uses, child care center and similar uses are contemplated to be provided in the proposed project. 601 East Hyman Avenue Application for Final Commercial Design Review 10 April 2013 Page 17 c. Affordable multi-family housing: No limitation. No affordable multi-family housing is contemplated to be provided in the proposed project. Affordable housing for the new residential and expanded commercial will be provided through the purchase of affordable housing credits. d. Lodging:.5:1, which may be increased to 1.5:1 if the individual lodge units on the parcel average five hundred (500) net livable squarefeet or less, which may be comprised of lock-off units. No lodging is contemplated to be provided in the proposed project. e. Free-market multi-family housing:.5:1, which may be increased to.75:1 if affordable housing equal to one hundred percent (100%) of the free-market residential floor area is developed on the same parcel. Maximum free-market residential floor area for the property is 2,250 sq. ft. or a ratio of 0.50:1. One (1) 1,908 sq. ft. free-market residential unit is proposed. Along with circulation and other non-unit space, the residential floor area ratio will be 0.50:1 or 2,250 sq. ft. f. Detached residential dwellings, duplex dwellings and bed and breakfast (as the sole use of parcel and not cumulative with other uses): Eighty percent (80%) of allowable floor area of a same-sized lot located in the R-6 Zone District. (See R-6 Zone District.) Extinguishment of historic TDRs shall not permit additional FAR for singledamity or duplex development. No detached residential dwellings, duplex dwellings and bed and breakfast (as the sole use of parcel and not cumulative with other uses) are contemplated to be provided in the proposed project. 12. Maximum multi-family residential dwelling unit size (square feet): 2,000 square feet of net livable area. The one (1) proposed multi-family residential dwelling unit will be 1,801 sq. ft. net livable. a. The property owner may increase individual multi-family unit size by extinguishing historic transferable development right certijicates Ccertifcate" or "certificates"), subject to the following: 1. The transfer ratio is five hundred (500) square feet of net livable area for each certificate that is purchased. 2. The additional square footage accrued may be apptied to multiple units. However, the maximum individual unit size attainable by transferring development rights is two thousand jive hundred (2,500) squarefeet ofnet livable area (i.e., no more than jive hundred [5001 additional square feet may be applied per unit). 3. This incentive applies only to individual unit size. Transferring development rights does not allow an increase in the FAR of the lot. No TDRs are contemplated to be extinguished in connection with the proposed project. 601 East Hyman Avenue Application for Final Commercial Design Review 10 April 2013 Page 18 13. Maximum lodge unit size (squarefeet): 1,500. When units are comprised of lockoffunits, this maximum shall apply to the largest possible combination of units. No lodge units are contemplated to be provided in connection with the proposed project. 14. CommerciaUresidential ratio: The total lodging and free-market residential net livable area shall be no greater than the total above-grade -floor area associated with the uses described in Subparagraphs 26.710.150.D.11.a. and b. combined on the same parcel. The total free-market residential net livable areas will not be greater than the total above-grade floor area associated with the commercial uses contemplated to be provided in the proposed project. Total free-market residential net livable is proposed to be 1,801 sq. ft. Total commercial floor area net leasable will be 5,487 sq. ft. This is a ratio of 3.05 commercial to residential floor area. 601 East Hyman Avenue Application for Final Commercial Design Review 10 April 2013 Page 19 0023 -8 Â·AS #* CEIVED ATTACHMENT 2 -LAND USE APPLICATION APR 1 1 2013 PROJEC'r: CITY OF ASPEN Name: Victorian Square Final Commercial Design Review COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT Location: 601 E. Hyman Ave. (indicate street address. lot & block number, legal description where appropriate) Parcel ID # (REQUIRED) 273718225801,273718225027,273718225028,273718225029,273718225030,273718225031, 273718225032,273718225033, APPLICANT: Name: Victorian Square, LLC Address: c/o Ronald Garfield, Esq., Garfield & Hecht, PC, 601 East Hyman Avenue, Aspen, CO 81611 Phone #: 970-925-1936 REPRESENTATIVE: Nanie: Stan Clauson, AICP, ASLA, Stan Clauson Associates, Inc. Address: 412 N. Mill Street, Aspen, CO 81611 970-925-2323 Phone #: TYPE OF APPI.]CATION: (please check all that apply): El GMQS Exemption E Conceptual PUD El Temporary Use U GMQS Allotment D Final PUD (& PUD Amendment) Â£ Text/Map Aniendment U Special Review 01 Subdivision C Conceptual SPA E ESA - 8040 Greenline. Stream D Subdivision Exemption (includes Â£ Final SPA (& SPA Margin. Hallam Lake Bluff. condominiumization) Amendment) Mountain View Plane Â® Commercial Design Review U Lot Split U Small Lodge Conversion/ Expansion U Residential Design Variance Â¤ Lot Line Adjustment O Other: U Conditional Use EXISTING CONDITIONS: (description of existing buildings. uses. previous approvals, etc.) The existing Victorian Square building currently contains office space exclusively. The subject parcel is located on half of three lots and consists of 4,500 sq. ft. The parcel has no alley access. PROPOSAL: (description ofproposed buildings, uses, modifications. etc.) The applicant seeks to redevelop the parcel with a mixed use building. Commercial space will occupy the basement, first, and second story and free-market residential will occupy the third story. Have you attached the following? FEES DUE: $ 5,465 Â® Pre-Application Conference Summary Â® Attachment #I, Signed Fee Agreement E Response to Attachment #3. Dimensional Requirements Form Â® Response to Attachment #4. Submittal Requirements- Including Written Responses to ReviewÂ· Standards Â® 3-D Model for large project All plans that are larger than 8.5'4 X 11" must be folded. A disk with an electric copy of all written text (Microsoft Word Format) must be submitted as part of the application. Large scale projects should include an electronic 3-D model. Your pre-application conference summary will indicate if you must submit a 3-D model. ATTACHMENT 3 DIMENSIONAL REQUIREMENTS FORM Project: Victorian Square Condominums Applicant: Victorian Square, LLC Location: 601 E. Hyman Avenue Zone District: Commercial (C-1) Lot Size: 4,500 sq. ft. Lot Area: 4,500 sq. ft. (for the purposes of calculating Floor Area, Lot Area may be reduced for areas within the high water mark, easements, and steep slopes. Please refer to the definition of Lot Area in the Municipal Code.) Commercial net leasable: Existing: 5,209 sq. ft. Proposed: 7,317 sq. ft, Number ofresidential units: Existing: 0 Proposed: 1 Number of bedrooms: Existing:_0 --Proposed: 3 Proposed % of demolition (Historic properties only): DIMENSIONS: Floor Area: Existing.~ 6,292 sq. ft.Allowable.- 11,250 sq. ft. Proposed: 9,304 sq. ft. Principal bldg. height: Existing: 28' Allowable: 40' Proposed: 36 Access. bldg. height: Existing: Allowable: Proposed: On-Site parking: Existing: 0 Required: 1 Proposed: 0 % Site coverage: Existing: 69% Required: n/a Proposed: 88% % Open Space: Existing: 595 sq. ft. Required: 595 sq. ft. Proposed: 552.5 sq. ft Front Setback: Existing: 1'-5' Required: nia Proposed: Rear Setback: Existing: 5' Required: n/a Proposed: Combined F/R: Existing.Â· 6'-10' Required: n/a Proposed: Side Setback: Existing.~_Est:5'_Required.* n/a Proposed: Side Setback: Existing: West: 10' Required. n/a Proposed: Combined Sides: Existing: 15' Required: n/a Proposed: Distance Between Existing Required: n/a Proposed: Buildings Existing non-conformities or encroachments: None. Variations requested: None requested. Attachment 4 Legend 2 1 Cities & Towns -- 8 444,4 81-+..~ -_____ \0\,,~~ ~ < 106.) 112,*-% UGB 6-J & '1 - / 1 110. / f . Addresses r/Â·/ ------3 ..1 /4 6 444 83. 2 e Â·- Trails i 236, r V 444< -%4 6 j PLS_m - , PLS_TR._SEC 7900 4:Ck-,4.... ~~ ,1 \ ~ Airport ,;V' Major Roads - 1001*-22-- i.*444"- Roads --- A 7 h 7 ~/ Eagt, and Garreld CO 119, ~ :3 Roads / 7-71 9/ 72Â«4\ 0 Â· 097 1 i~~] Edge of Pavement Aspen Â»4. fi 4,7. f 620Â· f ,/v' Edge of Pavement Plain f-Â·LJL~LLA } 1 9--7 43- V :,./.; 47 \ .0' < & Streams 19-2 - , /1.13 6..e: 'h-J ~iN jj - ~ _ 1 Subdivision, 682 C - fi ~ Mines 27 Structures L-I Condos r 4 U 047.. ' 7160 .734 732 . 1 1 601:-1+ - ----- .1- . 60 1 tz>...... ;t- â„¢be20 '1 - Parcels - 2 10012 Topo 1 2,~ 611-~ 2 -2-. C Lakes & Ponds '',fs~:.. Â·, ' 615* 63625.1~~2 â€¢7 "2 ' "~ u - , - =_2 7<30 - Federal Lands * 1- r.-4 iÂ¢ U-$14 4-~r - EZI .01 14 0= STATIOFCO /7, 44'.CZED 71 82, r US" 1 . -1- 719. 6084 7 n, 207. lz~ 4- J~~~* b~ ,610. ~416. po. f cay 4 1 1 . ,--'P -- ..r-C34 >27~ 2737 Tl OS RBAW 2, 2 i <g f 321. ---- LIN - -F Â£ i ~.0 111 70~ 702 1. 11 1.- } 3 16 7/7 1 1 - r b . -----...-'~4# 1/ -1 If gil , - -2.44/ 776110 -* -4 C Â£ 1,1,----==== 1, /11/ 2-22.1/4'FL- 1 / 44- fli - 3---2>-d# #, 625, .--.,- -- t 0.-1- - , 250, 11 8 637, 3 9. L.-J Z-- 1 , 1 .-3' d Amp5,1-A.AM N , I { i t 816, 312. e j~+- XJ N -- Â· Neoo. 707 - I . I 1 0 64 I. . :004?44 4. ers:b <3 680/ - .'18 - 'ur 83;X ==-2/ 624, (J 806~7 4/ 4 2/.<.5..,4/gr - / 1--1/- Sl 4.I--7,-CI- -- -, 700. Clj l_1' ~ 407:~ ~ 2 / 979_704:-706. t-- 4 402 601> _./980\ r 4 782J ' 617.615 A-- - 841 Mouniant Att . AA c h -5~,-.9 ': - 1- iiI -~7 411# ArÂ» ##0 7<'-- 9 - ' -----Wa_~-W Â·â€¢ 44.= 610 if -- F l 1 1 40 %3/0/--. 4 n.,1 ---2--2-46- 820m. p 711. ~7 6*01-179 -/ i 98 -Â·-2 614 -Â« Â¢lly Mst PU D 8052~4==> 0 1 f aib,J - 806*.*. . 426 \ Subject Parcel 601 East Hyman Application for Final Commercial Design Review W, 01 tr- 2,1./ &~-~ Parcel Detail Page 1 of 2 Pitkin County Assessor Parcel Detail Information Assessor Property Search I Assessor Subset Ouery I Assessor Sales Search Clerk & Recorder Reception Search I Treasurer Tax Search Search Basic Building Characteristics I Value Summary Parcel Detail I Value Detail I Sales Detail I Residential/Commercial Improvement Detail Owner Detail I Land Detail I Photographs Tax Area Account Number Parcel Number 2011 Mill Levy 001 R020234 273718225801 31.653 Primary Owner Name and Address VICTORIAN SQUARE CONDO ASSOC COMMON AREA Additional Owner Detail Legal Description Subdivision: VICTORIAN SQUARE DESC: COMMON AREA Location Physical Address: 601 E HYMAN AVE ASPEN Subdivision: VICTORIAN SQUARE Land Acres: Land Sq Ft: 0 2011 Property Value Summary Actual Value Assessed Value Land: 0 0 Improvements: 0 0 Total: 0 0 11 1 1 http://www.pitkinassessor.org/assessor/parcel.asp?AccountNumber=R020234 10-Apr-12 Parcel Detail Page 2 0 f 2 Sale Date: ~ Sale Price: Additional Sales Detail Basic Building Characteristics Number of Residential 0 Buildings: Number of Comm/Ind 0 Buildings: No Building Records Found Top of Page Assessor Database Search Options Pitkin County Home Page The Pitkin County Assessor's Offices make every effort to collect and maintain accurate data. However, Good Turns Software and the Pitkin County Assessor's Offices are unable to warrant any of the information herein contained. Copyright Â© 2003 - 2011 Good Turns Software. All Rights Reserved. Database & Web Design by Good Turns Software. http://www.pitkinassessor.org/assessor/parcel.asp?AccountNumber=R020234 10-Apr-12 Parcel Detail Page 1 of 2 Pitkin County Assessor Parcel Detail Information Assessor Property Search I Assessor Subset Query I Assessor Sales Search Clerk & Recorder Reception Search I Treasurer Tax Search Search Basic Building Characteristics I Value Summary Parcel Detail I Value Detail I Sales Detail I Residential/Commercial Improvement Detail Owner Detail I Land Detail I Photographs Tax Area Account Number Parcel Number 2011 Mill Levy 001 R009142 273718225027 31.653 Primary Owner Name and Address VICTORIAN SQUARE LLC 418 E COOPER AVE #207 ASPEN, CO 81611 Additional Owner Detail Legal Description Subdivision: VICTORIAN SQUARE Unit: 1 Location Physical Address: 601 E HYMAN AVE ASPEN Subdivision: VICTORIAN SQUARE Land Acres: Land Sq Ft: 0 2011 Property Value Summary Actual Value Assessed Value Land: 0 0 Improvements: 825,300 239,340 Total: 825,300 239,340 http://www.pitkinassessor.org/assessor/parcel.asp?AccountNumber=R009142 10-Apr-12 Parcel Detail Page 2 of 2 Sale Date: Sale Price: Additional Sales Detail Basic Building Characteristics Number of Residential 0 Buildings: Number of Comm/Ind 1 Buildings: Commercial/Industrial Building Occurrence 0 Characteristics OFFICE FIRST FLOOR: 717 Total Area: 717 Property Class: 2245 Actual Year Built: 1975 Effective Year Built: 1985 Quality of Construction: GOOD-BASE Exterior Wall: GOOD BASE Interior Wall: GOOD-BASE - Neighborhood: VICTORIAN SQUARE "B" Top of Page Assessor Database Search Options Pitkin County Home Page The Pitkin County Assessor's Offices make every effort to collect and maintain accurate data. However, Good Turns Software and the Pitkin County Assessor's Offices are unable to warrant any o f the information herein contained. Copyright Â© 2003 - 2011 Good Turns Software. All Rights Reserved. Database & Web Design by Good Turns Software. http://www.pitkinassessor.org/assessor/parcel.asp?AccountNumber=R009142 10-Apr-12 Parcel Detail Page 1 of 2 Pitkin County Assessor Parcel Detail Information Assessor Property Search I Assessor Subset Query I Assessor Sales Search Clerk & Recorder Reception Search I Treasurer Tax Search Search Basic Building Characteristics I Value Summary Parcel Detail I Value Detail I Sales Detail I Residential/Commercial Improvement Detail Owner Detail I Land Detail I Photographs Tax Area Account Number Parcel Number 2011 Mill Levy 001 R009143 273718225028 31.653 Primary Owner Name and Address VICTORIAN SQUARE LLC 418 E COOPER AVE #207 ASPEN, CO 81611 - Additional Owner Detail Legal Description Subdivision: VICTORIAN SQUARE Unit: 2 Location Physical Address: 601 E HYMAN AVE ASPEN Subdivision: VICTORIAN SQUARE Land Acres: Land Sq Ft: 0 2011 Property Value Summary Actual Value Assessed Value Land: 0 0 Improvements: 962,100 279,010 Total: 962,100 279,010 http://www.pitkinassessor.org/assessor/parcel.asp?AccountNumber=R009143 10-Apr-12 Parcel Detail Page 2 of 2 Sale Date: Sale Price: Additional Sales Detail Basic Building Characteristics Number of Residential 0 Buildings: Number of Comm/Ind 1 Buildings: Commercial/Industrial Building Occurrence 0 Characteristics OFFICE SECOND/THIRD: 1,194 Total Area: 1,194 Property Class: 2245 Actual Year Built: 1975 Effective Year Built: 1985 Quality of Construction: GOOD-BASE Exterior Wall: GOOD BASE Interior Wall: GOOD-BASE Neighborhood: VICTORIAN SQUARE "B" Top of Page Assessor Database Search Options Pitkin County Home Page The Pitkin County Assessor's Offices make every effort to collect and maintain accurate data. However, Good Turns Software and the Pitkin County Assessor's Offices are unable to warrant any of the information herein contained. Copyright Â© 2003 - 2011 Good Turns Software. All Rights Reserved. Database & Web Design by Good Turns Software. http://www.pitkinassessor.org/assessor/parcel.asp?AccountNumber=R009143 10-Apr-12 Parcel Detail Page 1 of 2 Pitkin County Assessor Parcel Detail Information Assessor Property Search I Assessor Subset Ouery I Assessor Sales Search Clerk & Recorder Reception Search I Treasurer Tax Search Search Basic Building Characteristics I Value Summary Parcel Detail I Value Detail I Sales Detail I ResidentiaFCommercial Improvement Detail Owner Detail I Land Detail I Photographs Tax Area Account Number Parcel Number 2011 Mill Levy 001 R009144 273718225029 31.653 Primary Owner Name and Address VICTORIAN SQUARE LLC 418 E COOPER AVE #207 ASPEN, CO 81611 Additional Owner Detail Legal Description Subdivision: VICTORIAN SQUARE Unit: 3 Location Physical Address: 601 E HYMAN AVE ASPEN Subdivision: VICTORIAN SQUARE Land Acres: Land Sq Ft: 0 2011 Property Value Summary Actual Value Assessed Value Land: 0 0 Improvements: 499,600 144,880 Total: 499,600 144,880 http://www.pitkinassessor.org/assessor/parcel.asp?AccountNumber==R009144 10-Apr-12 Page 2 of 2 Parcel Detail Sale Date: Sale Price: Additional Sales Detail Basic Building Characteristics Number of Residential 0 Buildings: Number of Comm/Ind 1 Buildings: Commercialindustrial Building Occurrence 0 Characteristics OFFICE SECOND/THIRD: 620 Total Area: 620 Property CIass: 2245 Actual Year Built: 1975 Effective Year Built: 1985 Quality of Construction: GOOD-BASE Exterior Wall: GOOD BASE Interior Wall: GOOD-BASE Neighborhood: VICTORIAN SQUARE "B" Top of Page Assessor Database Search Options Pitkin County Home Page The Pitkin County Assessor's Offices make every effort to collect and maintain accurate data. However, Good Turns Software and the Pitkin County Assessor's Offices are unable to warrant any o f the information herein contained. Copyright Â© 2003 - 2011 Good Turns Software. All Rights Reserved. Database & Web Design by Good Turns Software. http://www.pitkinassessor.org/assessor/parcel.asp?AccountNumber=R009144 10-Apr-12 Parcel Detail Page 1 of 2 Pitkin County Assessor Parcel Detail Information Assessor Property Search I Assessor Subset Ouery I Assessor Sales Search Clerk & Recorder Reception Search I Treasurer Tax Search Search Basic Building Characteristics I Value Summary Parcel Detail I Value Detail I Sales Detail I Residential/Commercial Improvement Detail Owner Detail I Land Detail I Photographs Tax Area Account Number Parcel Number 2011 Mill Levy 001 R009145 273718225030 31.653 Primary Owner Name and Address VICTORIAN SQUARE LLC 418 E COOPER AVE #207 ASPEN, CO 81611 Additional Owner Detail Legal Description Subdivision: VICTORIAN SQUARE Unit: 4 Location Physical Address: 601 E HYMAN AVE ASPEN Subdivision: VICTORIAN SQUARE Land Acres: Land Sq Ft: 0 2011 Property Value Summary Actual Value Assessed Value Land: 0 0 Improvements: 507,600 147,200 Total: 507,600 147,200 http://www.pitkinassessor.org/assessor/parcel.asp?AccountNumber=R009145 10-Apr-12 Parcel Detail Page 2 of 2 Sale Date: Sale Price: Additional Sales Detail Basic Building Characteristics Number of Residential 0 Buildings: Number of Comm/Ind 1 Buildings: Commercial/Industrial Building Occurrence 0 Characteristics OFFICE SECOND/THIRD: 630 Total Area: 630 Property Class: 2245 Actual Year Built: 1975 Effective Year Built: 1985 Quality of Construction: GOOD-BASE Exterior Wall: GOOD BASE Interior Wall: GOOD-BASE Neighborhood: VICTORIAN SQUARE "B" Top of Page Assessor Database Search Options Pitkin County Home Page The Pitkin County Assessor's Offices make every effort to collect and maintain accurate data. However, Good Turns Software and the Pitkin County Assessor's Offices are unable to warrant any o f the information herein contained. Copyright Â© 2003 - 2011 Good Turns Software. All Rights Reserved. Database & Web Design by Good Turns Software. http://www.pitkinassessor.org/assessor/parcel.asp?AccountNumber==R009145 10-Apr-12 Parcel Detail Page 1 of 2 Pitkin County Assessor Parcel Detail Information Assessor Property Search I Assessor Subset Ouery I Assessor Sales Search Clerk & Recorder Reception Search 1 Treasurer Tax Search Search Basic Building Characteristics I Value Summary Parcel Detail I Value Detail I Sales Detail I Residential/Commercial Improvement Detail Owner Detail I Land Detail I Photographs Tax Area Account Number Parcel Number 2011 Mill Levy 001 R009146 273718225031 31.653 Primary Owner Name and Address VICTORIAN SQUARE LLC - 418 E COOPER AVE #207 ASPEN, CO 81611 Additional Owner Detail Legal Description Subdivision: VICTORIAN SQUARE Unit: 5 Location Physical Address: 601 E HYMAN AVE ASPEN Subdivision: VICTORIAN SQUARE Land Acres: Land Sq Ft: 0 2011 Property Value Summary Actual Value Assessed Value Land: 0 0 Improvements: 760,900 220,660 Total: 760,900 220,660 http://www.pitkinassessor.org/assessor/parcel.asp?AccountNumber==R-009146 10-Apr-12 Parcel Detail Page 2 of 2 Sale Date: Sale Price: Additional Sales Detail Basic Building Characteristics Number of Residential 0 Buildings: Number of Comm/Ind 1 Buildings: Commercial/Industrial Building Occurrence 0 Characteristics OFFICE FIRST FLOOR: 661 Total Area: 661 Property Class: 2245 Actual Year Built: 1975 Effective Year Built: 1985 Quality of Construction: GOOD-BASE Exterior Wall: GOOD BASE Interior Wall: GOOD-BASE Neighborhood: VICTORIAN SQUARE 1,13,1 Top of Page Assessor Database Search Options Pitkin County Home Page The Pitkin County Assessor's Offices make every effort to collect and maintain accurate data. However, Good Turns Software and the Pitkin County Assessor's Offices are unable to warrant any of the information herein contained. Copyright Â© 2003 - 2011 Good Turns Software. All Rights Reserved. Database & Web Design by Good Turns Software. http://www.pitkinassessor.org/assessor/parcel.asp?AccountNumber=R009146 10-Apr-12 Parcel Detail Page 1 of 2 Pitkin County Assessor Parcel Detail Information Assessor Property Search I Assessor Subset Ouery I Assessor Sales Search Clerk & Recorder Reception Search I Treasurer Tax Search Search Basic Building Characteristics I Value Summary Parcel Detail I Value Detail I Sales Detail I Residential/Commercial Improvement Detail Owner Detail 1 Land Detail I Photographs Tax Area Account Number Parcel Number 2011 Mill Levy 001 R009147 273718225032 31.653 A Primary Owner Name and Address VICTORIAN SQUARE LLC 418 E COOPER AVE #207 ASPEN, CO 81611 Additional Owner Detail Legal Description Subdivision: VICTORIAN SQUARE Unit: 6 Location Physical Address: 601 E HYMAN AVE ASPEN Subdivision: VICTORIAN SQUARE Land Acres: Land Sq Ft: 0 2011 Property Value Summary Actual Value Assessed Value Land: 0 0 Improvements: 960,000 278,400 Total: 960,000 278,400 http://www.pitkinassessor.org/assessor/parcel.asp?AccountNumber=R009147 10-Apr-12 Parcel Detail Page 2 of 2 Sale Date: Sale Price: Additional Sales Detail Basic Building Characteristics Number of Residential 0 Buildings: Number of Comm/Ind 1 Buildings: Commercial/Industrial Building Occurrence 0 Characteristics OFFICE FIRST FLOOR: 834 Total Area: 834 Property Class: 2245 Actual Year Built: 1975 Effective Year Built: 1985 Quality of Construction: GOOD-BASE Exterior Wall: GOOD BASE Interior Wall: GOOD-BASE Neighborhood: VICTORIAN SQUARE "B" Top of Page Assessor Database Search Options Pitkin County Home Page The Pitkin County Assessor's Offices make every effort to collect and maintain accurate data. However, Good Turns Software and the Pitkin County Assessor's Offices are unable to warrant any of the information herein contained. Copyright Â© 2003 - 2011 Good Turns Software. All Rights Reserved. Database & Web Design by Good Turns Software. http://www.pitkinassessor.org/assessor/parcel.asp?AccountNumber=R009147 10-Apr-12 Parcel Detail Page 1 of 2 Pitkin County Assessor Parcel Detail Information Assessor Property Search I Assessor Subset Ouery I Assessor Sales Search Clerk & Recorder Reception Search I Treasurer Tax Search Search Basic Building Characteristics I Value Summary Parcel Detail I Value Detail I Sales Detail I Residential/Commercial Improvement Detail Owner Detail I Land Detail I Photographs Tax Area Account Number Parcel Number 2011 Mill Levy 001 R009148 273718225033 31.653 Primary Owner Name and Address VICTORIAN SQUARE LLC 418 E COOPER AVE #207 ASPEN, CO 81611 Additional Owner Detail Legal Description Subdivision: VICTORIAN SQUARE Unit: 7 Location Physical Address: 601 E HYMAN AVE ASPEN Subdivision: VICTOR-IAN SQUARE Land Acres: Land Sq Ft: 0 2011 Property Value Summary Actual Value Assessed Value Land: 0 0 Improvements: 689,500 199,960 Total: 689,500 199,960 http://www.pitkinassessor.org/assessor/parcel.asp?AccountNumber==R009148 10-Apr-12 Parcel Detail Page 2 of 2 Sale Date: Sale Price: Additional Sales Detail Basic Building Characteristics Number of Residential 0 Buildings: Number of Comm/Ind 1 Buildings: Commercial/Industrial Building Occurrence 0 Characteristics OFFICE FIRST FLOOR: 599 Total Area: 599 Property Class: 2245 Actual Year Built: 1975 Effective Year Built: 1985 Quality of Construction: GOOD-BASE Exterior Wall: GOOD BASE Interior Wall: GOOD-BASE Neighborhood: VICTORIAN SQUARE "B" Top of Page Assessor Database Search Options Pitkin County Home Page The Pitkin County Assessor's Offices make every effort to collect and maintain accurate data. However, Good Turns Software and the Pitkin County Assessor's Offices are unable to warrant any o f the information herein contained. Copyright Â© 2003 - 2011 Good Turns Software. All Rights Reserved. Database & Web Design by Good Turns Software. http://www.pitkinassessor.org/assessor/parcel.asp?AccountNumber==R009148 10-Apr-12 Attachment 5 IMPROVEMENT SURVEY PLAT OF: VICTORIAN SQUARE CONDOMINIUMS. ff 1 -1-4393'*itÂ·Â·:lit.4~'-Â·~~.Â·9>,2-,JAN,?i~JÂ·Â·:4$-z A PARCEL OF LAND SITUATED ON THE N h OF LOTS A, B, & C 3 . ..:21%.13.? -1. 11., 6.#~:h.q.z.I-':Â·CÂ· rha.k;F ..0 *91-..rb f~*~ A.:t:'..Â·*2453 ?A â‚¬-7 ~ â‚¬.;t~:: 9.'4 iY<% ..~ 59Â·ff,i; IN BLOCK 100, IN THE SWh OF SECTION 7 Â¢Â»(--- c.&~E*-7~.2,4 : J-..S':Â·943:Â·:f.,1 TOWNSHIP 10 SOUTH, RANGE 84 WEST OF THE 6th P.M. 4 ..:.i.id'trit:..Ikey~~~ .. A ......P 1, W :4 ' / 1 .--4.411:41,1,Â»th/vil.p.fn~:~~72-40,4: ' - - 4 CITY OF ASPEN, COUNTY OF PITKIN, STATE OF COLORADO SHEET 1 OF 1 ~ E--itÂ·il ~titf#4449ff 1 1 - . 1% ..Al. 6, FÂ·-f~.r~~~~~'f~p~hi:~4~~:94 ~~~~6~ .:~:A i .4 1& -Sle. .. ' \X ' -- 1 - 1 1- :e-Â·d..rÂ· ,-Ak,4''J.Â»',: + .. . 1.44,1.1 4....5 1 1 1 -1 -1 -1 - 1 - - - 1 1 . 1 /LÂ·-â‚¬Â·caziviwotÂ·ieÂ«>3?Â·9:We2Â»Â£Â·AÂ®.*;~~7- 1 . 1 - 1 - 1 - 1 - - 11 - 1 ~--ffÂ¢*itri~ip?*t.:~DfA.94.}Â·.499&11'*-Â·iÂ·.*Ii'-Â·., 1 i.1 1, - 11 11- Â· ..... 1 1-41 - ' - - 919Â·'tlf -9< 7,>*0;.'2'~~:'6''t@,1:.i'':.:Ti# '-:457.--3371 0.;a.M-'.3 6 1 11 4 - 11 1 - -- - - - -1 I.--' 1)-f.<347.1,1.1<,1,1*,7 1 1 - 1 1 1 1 - . - - 2424.1.~iu.?11; jj':z..2-9,.F<~r*13;Â·Â·*r-:24<-Â·2:4Â¢2~~.:Â·Im 1 1-1 -Il Â»Z--11 -2 ---14 -1 -1 11-1- D . - 1 - TI 1 1- -11 .1 1 1 1 1 - 1 1 1 1 1 3- 1 11 11 -- I- 1 11- - 1 1 - 1 - VICINITY MAP - - 11 1 - --- 1 - SCALE: 1'=2000 1 1 --1 - - 1-1 - r ~1 - 1- 1 1 - 1 1 -1 1 1 1. - 1 1 1 I J 1 1-* f L 1 -1 : HI IVIALI AVEI IUE GRAPHIC SCALE ' -- -i - 1 ' 1 - 1 PROPERTY DESCRIPTION - - 1 -1 H T 1111 -1 1 .. ' 12-11- 11 - 1 -6- t'I ~~~ I- I ~ It _~IZ- 1 -----i- 111-1.1--1--' - - ~ - ~- -- r.1,-Â· ,-tÂ· _ - - VICTORIAN SQUARE CONDOMINIUMS, ACCORDING TO THE CONDOMINIUM MAP , I - - THEREOF RECORDED AUGUST 14, 1979 IN PLAT BOOK 8AT PAGE 25, AND AS DEFINED (IN FEET ) ' I - 1 - ~ - ' - AND DESCRIBED IN THE CONDOMINIUM DEelARATION FOR VICTORIAN SQUARE linch= 10R - r CONDOMINIUMS RECORDED AUGUST 14, 1979 IN 8OOK 374 AT PAGE 124. I. 1 4 , Â· CITY AND TOWNSITE OF ASPEN - - - 1 - COUNTY OF PITKIN 1 - 1 - 1- 1 - 1 -- - Ill .- i. STATE OF COLORADO 1 1--- 11. -1 - rTIi 11 111- ' ....1, r'L--4,--4~- '~--4. CONCRETE,-- -_.LT-1 .-Il \ NOTES 4 1) DATE OF SURVEY: APRIL 17,2012. I V D, 9 , CONCRETE SIDEWALK 145~7 ~ ~ ~ 1 - 'k-7 k -1.46 r ./\ I - F 7 2 7 2) DATE OF PREPARATION: APRIL, 2012. 412, 5,20'14\ \1 =51:EXICINAMARK ~- -1' 4 ,< ; \'' \ 6 7% n. SAÂ°09'11'IEI/2 BASISOFBEARING .90.00' 9 V. r 1 1 M \ r 1/ 1 .1 -- 3) BASIS OF BEARING: A BEARING OF S 75~09'11" E FROM THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF LOT A, BLOCK - 3. \ teÂ·T3 / . - 100 MONUMENTED BY A #5 REBAR & PLASTIC CAP L.S. #28643 AND THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF LOT I, -0 1 - ----MÂ·1925 ELEV. = 7924.79 BLOCK 100 MONUMENTED BY A PK NAIL W/SHINER LS, #28643. r*Â©C- ~~r ' ---- VICTORIAN SQUARE 1 1 I.-1 1 -/29*Â©L CONDOMINIUM 4) BASIS OF SURVEY: THE CONDOMINIUM MAP OF VICTORIAN SQUARE CONDOMINIUM AS RECORDED IN 4500 SQ FT. t BOOK 8 AT PAGE 25 AS RECEPTION NO. 217115, THE FINAL PLAT OF THE UM SUBDIVISION AS RECORDED 0.103 ACRES * STEEL POST I Il,p.1 IN BOOK 96 ON PAGE 9 AS RECEPTION NO. 577041, THE CITY OF ASPEN -GPS CONTROL MONUMENTATION 2009, PREPARED 8Y MARCIN ENGINEERING DATED 12/2/2009, THE OFFICIAL MAP, CITY OF ASPEN, - 1 -f A- j k\.><Â» - 1- - - Â· DECEMBER 12,1959, VARIOUS DOCUMENTS OF RECORD, AND THE FOUND MONUMENTS, AS SHOWN. Â«gie*ly' filis.38 ' TWO STORY BRICK OFFICE BUILDING i 5) THIS SURVEY DOES NOT CONSTITUTE A nTLE SEARCH BY SOPRIS ENGINEERING, LLC (SE) TO DETERMINE 0 -- -2 -C 1 h :* U/3 .-- 601 E. HYMAN AVE. - OWNERSHIP OR EASEMENTS OF RECORD. FOR ALL INFORMATION REGARDING EASEMENTS, RIGHTS OF - WAY AND/OR TITLE OF RECORD, SE RELIED UPON THE ABOVE SAID PLATS DESCRIBED IN NOTE 4 AND THE - ~ | :- .7. i|f't-ki TITLE COMMITMENT PREPARED BY PITKIN COUNTY TITLE, INC. UNDER CASE NO, PCT12860C2 WITH AN 19' bLE EFFECTIVE DATE OF JULY, 15, 1998. V 45-,4492'k ELEVATION OF 7911.98' (NAV[ 1988) ON THE NGS STATION "Q-159". THIS ESTABLISHED THE PROJECT \ 411- eli. 6) BASIS OF ELEVAT3ON: THE CITY OF ASPEN - GPS CONTROL MONUMENTATION 2009 CONTROL DATUM, 433 SPRING H r-- AC UNIT ~~44:=:k WHICH IS BASED ON AN ELEVATION OF 7720.88' (NAVD 1988) ON THE NGS STATION "S-159", AND AN 11- / 47 1/Ik+24-J\ /\ , 1\ D 1 - 1 1 - 3 0.1, 9, 1 ,\- BRICK WJ/ ; ; -1 - r- Â¥.89* ~ 4 :Al V I 1 4-1 ,- 5.19' O%%.es,C BENCHMARK, SHOWN HEREON. t)5 7) CONTOUR INTERVAL: ONS Â¢1) FOOT. Ll f --I - 1- 1 ,/ 1 L.L-14.4.74' IL--0 .r-1 - |73 - Eg t] -b - - 0 --1 m.1 4.75'- c 81 THE LINEAR UNIT USED IN THE PREPARATION OF THIS PLAT IS THE U.S. SURVEY FOOT AS DEFINED BY 90Â·09 PRIVATE THE UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE, NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF STANDARDS AND ~ ~ 1/1 1//,Tm )#Â·~f~ 16JKi*JCAG64/ un AN: 71#* M lk" Ngi "W PARKING TECHNOLOGY. GRAVEL 1 ltv B C Ls. 019$98 , FOUND #5 REBAR L & PLASTIC CAP I Ir - TITLE NOTE C , p 11 SET l' WITNESS . BRASS CAP L- AC UNIT AND DUCT WORK LS.#28643 SUBJECT TO ENCROACHMENT 11 ACCORDINGTOTHE ENCROACHMENT LICENSE RECORDED FEBRUARY 18, 1994 AS RECEPTION NO. = LICENCE REC. NOS. 367122 & 367122 AND AMENDMENT TO SAID ENCROACHMENT LICENSE RECORDED DECEMBER 11, 1996 AS 399918 SEE TITLE NOTE 1 RECEPTION NO. 399918, VICTORIAN SQUARE CONDOMINIUM ASSOCIATION GRANTS A REVOCABLE 1 4 LICENSE TO THE OWNERS OF THE SOUTH HALF OF LOTS A, 8, C OF BLOCK 100 FOR "EXTERIOR DUCT WORK, LEGEND 1, 1 WRNG-ANDOTHER MECHANICAL ANWOR ELECTRICAL EQUIPMENT OR DEVICES..." AS WELL AS "EXISTING - ENCROACHMENTS (USED BY LITTLE OUIES RESTAURANT) TO BE USED FOR EXHAU5TSMOKE PURPOSES 9 ~E Uft AND TO PERMIT THE INSTALLATION OF AN ADDITIONAL DUCT (WHICH WILL BECOME PART OF THE ENCROACHMENTS) TOBEUSED FOR EXHAUSTSMOKE PURPOSES BY MCSTORUE'S PUB." a 4-320 * LIGHT POLE - ~ ' 10 1 -0011 SEWER MANHOLE - 41 6, O ELECTRIC METER = DÂ»14 SURVEYOR'S CERTIFICATE m TELEPHONEPEDESTAL I, GEOFFREY R. KELLER, HEREBY CERTIFY TO VICTORIAN SQUARE LLC, A COLORADO LIMITED LLABILITY SIGN 1 @ STORM MANHOLE . BY C.R.S. Â§ 38-51-102(9).AND THAT IT ISA MONUMENTED LAND SURVEY SHOWING THE CURRENT COMPANY AND PITKIN COUNTY TITLE, INC., THAT THIS IS AN "IMPROVEMENT SURVEY PLAr' AS DEFINED --- It - Ut - UNDERGROUND TELEPHONE , 1 ~-~| 1 5 FOUND #5 REBAR LOCATION OF ALL STRUCTURES, WATER COURSES, WATER FEATURES AND/OR BODIES OF WATER, FLOOD UNDERGROUND ELECTRIC - | I I f r W HPLASTICIAP PLAIN, VISIBLE ROADS. TRAILS, UTILITIES, FENCES, HEDGE, OR WALLS SITUATED ON THE DESCRIBED L.S.Â·NO. 28643 PARCEL AND WITHIN FIVE FEET OF ALL BOUNDARIES OF SUCH PARCEL, ANY CONFLICTING BOUNDARY - 89 -SS- SEWER LINE - ~ Il ~ |-~ . | o o PRIVATE NATURE THAT ARE VISIBLE, OR APPARENT, OR OF RECORD AND UNDERGROUND UTILITIES EVIDENCE OR V[SIBLE ENCROACHMENTS, AND ALL EASEMENTS AND RIGHTS OF WAY OF A PUBLIC OR - w -w- WATER LINE _ DESCRIBED IN PITKIN COUNTY TITLE INC'S TITLE INSURANCE CASE NO. PCT12860C2, OR OTHER SOURCES -ug -Ug- GAS UNE . .Ir: .I- I - Â· - ler - 1 ..W-: --'...r.Â·... ./:''~7Rr-Ttrfg AS SPECIFIED ON THE IrdEN*EMENT~URVEY PLAT. -.9 -ug -ug '.,Lbu 'I' t.*ty.Â·Â·272<Sex.,r it'.d. L.-'Â·. 2Â·9''Q~?; 9 J IRON FENCE UNDERGROUNDCABLE .1- - M --- St - St - STORM SEWER LINE a -W[/ - 1 4,1 21 00 00 ~W 0 -- .04 12..34....911.~ f.?61-f~fq,91*f--t GEOFFREY R. KELL~% ~SVEPU7 21 gj) ( GENERAL UTILITY NOTES: -- ---- - -- -_ifj=._ 81 0 - 1. The locations of underground utilities have been plotted based on SOPRIS ENGINEERING - LLC -'Â°*jg*NF:bi'. utility maps, construction/design plans, other information provided by utility companies and actual field locations in some instances. These CIVIL CONSULTANTS utilities, as shown, may not represent actual field conditions. It is the 502 MAIN STREET, SUITE A3 NOTICEÂ· ACCORDING TO ColoRADO LAWYOU MUST COMMENCE ANY 'GA~ AcrION BASED UPON ANY DEFECT IN THIS SURVEY WrTHIN â„¢REE YEAR5 responsibility of the contractor to contact all utility companies for field CARBONDALE, COLORADO 81623 AFrER YOU FIRST DISCOVER SUCH DEFECr+ IN NO EVENT MAY ANY ACrION location of utilities prior to construction. B.~SEoupo~AmoEFECTINTHISSURVEYSECOMMENCED MOREâ„¢ANTEN YEARS FROM THE DATE OF CERTIFICAION SHOWN HEREON. (970) 704-0311 SOPRISENG@SOPRISENG.COM AJS 12082 .Â·20 2012 \120824SP.DWG f Â· 4'i Â· . le 4CONCRETE SIDEWALF n~~ , 80'05 < 3,64,09.'IN TREETr- Attachment 6 Mr. Ronald Garfield, President Victorian Square, LLC 601 East Hyman Avenue Aspen, CO 816111 Tel: 970-925-1936 17 April 2012 Ms. Sara Adams Senior Planner City of Aspen Community Development Department 130 S. Gatena St.. 3rd Floor Aspen, CO 81611 Dear Ms. Adams: This letter is to certify that I. Ronald Garfield. President of Victorian Square, LLC. owner of the properly located at 601 East Hyman Avenue, Aspen, Colorado, known as the Victorian Square Condominiums, give Stan Clauson Associates, Inc. and its staff permission to represent us in discussions with the City of Aspen regarding applications for the this properly. If you should have any questions regarding this matter, please contact me. Their contact information is as follows: Stan Clauson, AICP, ASLA Stan Clauson Associates, Inc 412 N. Mill Street Aspen, CO 81611 Tel (970)925-2323 Fax (970)920-1628 VerY -iru~Jours, y# . - :fi@ts~ -Wl 1 ./ J n.....1 1 1 , Actorian Square, LLC 1/Molewd#li Attachment 7 O & E REPORT To: GARFIELD & HECHT PC Date Ordered: 04-17-2012 Land Title GUARANTEE COMPANY Attn: STACY STANEK Order Number 427645 W.W.LTIC.COM Fax: 970-925-3008 Phone: 970-925-1936 Address: 601 E HYMAN AVE ASPEN, CO 81611 County: PITKIN LEGAL DESCRIPTION VICTORIAN SQUARE CONDOMINIUMS, COUNTY OF PITKIN, STATE OF COLORADO. OWNERSHIP & ENCUMBRANCES Certification Date: 04-13-2012 OWNERSHIP: VICTORIAN SQUARE LLC Doc Type_ Doc Fee Date Reference# DEED $0.00 07-15-1998 419488 DEED $0.00 11-09-1998 424287 ENCUMBRANCES AND OTHER DOCUMENTS Item Payable To Amount Date Reference# DEED OF TRUST US BANK $3,000,000.00 01-24-07 533719 Cust Ref# This report is for informational purposes only and does not constitute any form of title guaranty nor By: DANIEL BENNETTS insurance. The liability of this company shall not exceed the charge paid by the applicant for this report, nor shall the company be held liable to any party other than the applicant for this report, Land Title Property Resource Specialist Email: dbennetts@Itgc.com Phone: 303-850-4105 Fax: 303-850-4184 Form OE.WEB 06/06 - 7 Prepared For: Land 11tl GARFIELD & HECHT PC GUARANTEE COMP~ STACY STANEK W.W.L.G..COM Reference: 601 E HYMAN AVE ASPEN, CO 81611 Attached are the additional documents you requested: Doc Type Recorded Reception#/BookPage DANIEL BENNETTS Land Title Property Resource Specialist Email: dbennetts@Itgc.com Phone: 303-850-4105 Fax: 303-850-4184 ADD.DOCS 427645 SCHEDULE A-OWNER'S POLICY CASE NUMBER DATE OF POLICY AMOUNT OF INSURANCE POLICY NUMBER PCT12860C2 July 15,1998 @ 4:15 PM $2,100,000.00 1312-120156 1. NAME OF INSURED: VICTORIAN SQUARE LLC, A COLORADO LIMITED AND LIABILITY COMPANY 2, THE ESTATE OR INTEREST IN THE LAND HEREIN AND WHICH IS COVERED BY THIS POLICY IS: IN FEE SIMPLE 3. THE ESTATE OR INTEREST REFERRED TO HEREIN IS AT DATE OF POLICY VESTED IN: VICTORIAN SQUARE LLC, A COLORADO LIMITED AND LIABILITY COMPANY 4. THE LAND REFERRED TO IN THIS POLICY IS SITUATED IN THE COUNTY OF PITKIN, STATE OF COLORADO AND IS DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: VICTORIAN SQUARE CONDOMINIUMS, according to the Condominium Map thereof recorded August 14, 1979 in Plat Book 8 at Page 25, and as defined and described in the Condominium Declaration for Victorian Square Condominiums recorded August 14, 1979 in Book 374 at Page 124. Countersigned: U Authorized Officer PITKIN COUNTY TITLE, INC. 601 E. HOPKINS AVE. ASPEN, COLORADO 81611 (970) 925-1766 (970) 925-6527 FAX PITKIN COUNTY TITLE, INC. 601 E. HOPKINS AVE. ASPEN, COLORADO 81611 (970) 925-1766/ (970)-925-6527 FAX THE POLICY NUMBER SHOWN ON THIS SCHEDULE MUST AGREE WITH THE PREPRINTED NUMBER ON THE COVER SHEET SCHEDULE B-OWNERS CASE NUMBER DATE OF POLICY POLICY NUMBER PCT12860C2 July 15, 1998 @4:15 PM 1312-120156 THIS POLICY DOES NOT INSURE AGAINST LOSS OR DAMAGE BY REASON OF THE FOLLOWING: 1. Rights or claims of parties in possession not shown by the public records. 2. Easements, or claims of easements, not shown by the public records. 3. Discrepancies, conflicts in boundary lines, shortage in area, encroachments, any facts which a correct survey and inspection of the premises would disclose and which are not shown by the public records. 4, Any lien, or right to a lien, for services, labor, or material heretofore or hereafter furnished, imposed by law and not shown by the public records. 5. Water rights, claims or title to water. 6. Taxes and assessments (not including condominium or homeowners association assessments or dues) for the year 98 and subsequent years only, a lien not yet due and payable. 7, Reservations and exceptions as set forth in the Deed from the City of Aspen recorded in Book 59 at Page 224 providing as follows: "That no title shall be hereby acquired to any mine of gold, silver, cinnabar or copper or to any valid mining claim or possession held under existing laws" 8. Terms, conditions, obligations and all matters as set forth in Statement of Exception from the Full Subdivision Process recorded July 12,1979 in Book 372 at Page 499. 9. Terms, conditions, provisions, obligations, easements, restrictions and assessments as set forth in the Condominium Declaration for Victorian Square Condominiums recorded August 14,1979 in Book 374 at Page 124, deleting therefrom any restrictions indicating preference, limitation or discrimination based on race, color, religion, sex, handicap, familial status or national origin. 10. Easements, rights of way and all matters as disclosed on Plat of subject property recorded August 14,1979 in Plat Book 8 at Page 25. 11. Terms, conditions, provisions and obligations as set forth in Encroachment License recorded February 18,1994 in Book 742 at Page 296 and Amendment thereto recorded December 11,1996 as Reception No. 399918. 12. Deed of Trust, Assignment of Leases and Rents, Security Agreement and Fixture Filing from : VICTORIAN SQUARE, LLC, A COLORADO LIMITED LIABILITY COMPANY To the Public Trustee of the County of Pitkin For the use of ' GENERAL ELECTRIC CAPITAL CORPORATION, A NEW YORK CORPORATION Original Amount : $1,500,000.00 Dated : JULY 15, 1998 Recorded : JULY 15, 1998 Reception No. : 419490 (Continued) POLICY NO. 1312-120156 CASE NO. PCT12860C2 SCHEDULE B-OWNERS --EXCEPTIONS--CONTINUED-- 13. Rights of tenants in possession under unrecorded leases solely as tenants and solely with respect to space occupied by each such tenant, (together with non-exclusive rights in common with other tenants in areas used by all tenants). 14. Security interest under the Uniform Commercial Code affecting subject property, notice of which is given by Financing Statement from VICTORIAN SQUARE, LLC, debtor to GENERAL ELECTRIC CAPITAL CORPORATION, secured party, Recorded July 15, 1998 as Reception No. 419492. EXCEPTIONS NUMBERED NONE ARE HEREBY OMITTED. Attachment 8 L EN= rowland + broughton architecture and urban design 234 e. hopkin& ave. 3377 blake st, 106 aspen .co 81611 denver, co 80205 970.544.9006Â¥ 303.308.1373 v 970544.3473 1 303.308.1375 f Consultants: -27 STAN CLAUSON ASSOCIATES mc Â£ Il.*I. ' '+4~Cul /1/.~;. 'Illâ‚¬$ ./11/ 4...0-9,11 -.......8,61: . j. t....3:3 I. 97042./28 UN'/ 1....intanrint<ol ........'ll IssueÂ· FINAL COMMERCIAL 05.30.2012 NEIGHBORHOOD 04.20.2012 CONCEPTUAL DESIGN REVIEW APPLICATION OUTREACH 06.07.2012 CONCEPTUAL DESIGN REVIEW DESIGN REVIEW RE-SUBMITTAL 2 RE-SUBMITTAL 1 07.03.2012 CONCEPTUAL DESIGN REVIEW 08.01.2012 GMQS APPLICATION 04.08.2013 FINAL COMMERCIAL DESIGN REVIEW 601 EAST HYMAN AVENUE 601 EAST HYMAN AVENUE 601 EAST HYMAN AVENUE ASPEN. CO 81611 PROJECT NOÂ· 21213.00 SHEET TITLE. COVER SHEET SCALE: AO.0 WI~- -- -Er. Câ‚¬â‚¬+72~2.4 _ ----#h rowland + broughton architecture and urban design -CANOPY OVERHANG ABOVE 234 e. hopkins ave, 3377 blake st. 106 aIpen.Â©0 81611 denver,co 80205 970.544.9006 v 303.308.1373 v 9 n ghi 1 970.544.3473 f 303.308.1375 f 62*itdltual-344%-*4 . PEDESTRIAN AMENITY 14 SHARED LOBBY 489 SF 239 SF 10.9% OF PROPERTYfr~ - COMM. 179 SF (75%> -RES 60 SF (25%) LOBBY Consutards: i/2/1//fulf///// //fff~ ......44#44&,fil.~lite/:915.33.5.5.611' rle ~ / ~ 1 / // / 50,mAERICIA~ . / i / 2 '., - I 1~STAN CLAUSON ASSOCIATEST,IC 84 SF - COMM. 84 SF (100%) I'ld,ip. ar.L...il.'I./.Ing.,fieÂ¢, U.... t,%/#.* AW...Ce:cia~aB,6,1 444 **32~9 2 .f*2323 ~Â·970/9,01~:t Wi#-u-a -.siapl,n~in: ~om STAIR & ELEVATOR 1 EN=U---U?Uflip[I--1 ~E TRASIURECYCLING -- 23_1%5 ~ -PFR- *FIll>tÂ·Mr 280 SF COMM. 210 SF (7596) 277 SF - RES. 70 SF (25%) - COMM. 208 SF {75%) ! unelinii 2_ L-E| 1 > ~~ ~~6:cf. 1111111~11 1 1~1lddrh,'1 1, ,iM., i i /1.6Â©-]IE.g* x // Al,1 .RES. 69 SF (25%) 246 SF -COMM, 185 SF {7596) . -/ f RES 61 SF (25%) 3-2:~ STAIR STARS (EXEMpn .... 191 SF 190 SF - COMM.143 SF (75%) - Rea 47 SF (25%) LEVEL 0 FLOOR PLAN LEVEL 1 FLOOR PLAN LEVEL 2 FLOOR PLAN - - Issue' 04.20.2012 CONCEPTUAL DESIGN REVIEW FLOOR AREA: NET LEASABLE: FLOOR AREA: NET LEASABLE FLOOR AREA NET LEASABLE: APPLICATION 05.30.2012 NEIGHBORHOOD 3,602 SF x 0% = 0 SF 1.816 SFCOMMERCIAL 2,588 SF RETA&L 2,497 SF COMMERCIAL 3,150 SF OFFICE 3,004 SF COMMERCIAL OUTREACH + 955 2 Â· NON-UNIT 191 SF STAIR EXEMPT 06.07.2012 CONCEPTUAL 3,543 SF FLOOR PLATE 121 2 *NON-UNIT DESIGN REVIEW RE-SUBMITTAL 1 3,738 SF FLOOR PLATE 07.03.2012 CONCEPTUAL DESIGN REVIEW RE-SUBMITTAL 2 08.01.2012 GMQS APPLICATION 04.08.2013 FINAL COMMERCIAL DESIGN REVIEW RESIDENTIAL 1.801 SF (NET) 1.908 SF (GROSS) DECK (304 SF) - 99Â«194Â« FLOOR AREA TOTALS: EXEMPT RESIDENTIAL DECK AREA: LEGEND: 1 //'ll'~~~~~.~ //1,/.Li 1----GREENROOF(EXEMPT) 5,822 SF COMMERCIAL (75%) 2,250 SF ALLOWABLE RESIDENTIAL FLOOR AREA NET LIVABLE FLOOR AREA '1--1/11. 601 EAST HYMAN GREEN ROOF + 1.908 SF RESIDENTIAL (25%) x 15% PERCENT ALLOWED (EXEMPT}~ -Â·9 < rE,1056!--,40~M,j L-1 - . STAIRS (EXEMPT} NET LEASABLE FLOOR AREA Thf~ AVENUE 7,730 SF TOTAL AREA(100%) 338 SF EXEMPT DECK AREA 44Jhhid 23,/121 .awa r , DECK AREA f \\3211 2 ./. --/-/U=~ ALLOWABLE RESIDENTIAL DECK AREA: EXEMPT AREA *3751 601 EAST HYMAN AVENUE 338 SF EXEMPT DECK AREA NON-UNIT SPACE ASPEN, CO 81611 1.2 SF RESIDENTIAL EXTRA PEDESTRIAN AMENITY -ffttltt 376 SF TOTAL DECK AREA ALLOWED GREEN ROOF GREEN ROOF {EXEMPT) PROPOSED RESIDENTIAL DECK AREA: DECK 72 SF 304 SF DECK#1 i_72 SF DECK#2 376 SF TOTAL DECK AREA PROPOSED LEVEL 3 FLOOR PLAN FLOOR AREA: NET LIVABLE: PROJECT NOÂ· 21213.00 2,050 SF RESIDENTIAL 1,801 SF RESIDENTIAL 284 SF EXEMPTIONS tg iE * NON-UNIT SHEET TITLEÂ· 2,334 SF FLOOR PLATE PROPOSED FLOOR AREA CALCULATIONS SCALE As indicated AO.3 Z e %.....4.-I j. ~ Â©â„¢...sED~D AIG,11' ~(11~*IG 1 rowland + broughton architecture and urban design 234 e. hopkins ave. 3377 blake st, 106 aspen .co 81611 denver, Â¢080205 970.544.9006 v 303.3081373 v 970.544.3473 f 303.308.1375 f 601 EAST HYMAN AVE-E FLOORAREA CALCULATIONS - PROPOSEO Consultarh 4/8/2013 41~STAN CLAUSON ASSOCIATESINC V,:z honh NIU Sti- A,pen. Colorado Gic. W.4 497'hys.râ€ž, i.,tg:0.'d:, /'"/Ill'.*I./- Â¥r~*.&./..... FLOOR AREA NON-UNLI SPACE Â· FLOOR AREA itt: FLOOR LEVEL COMMERCIAL RESIDENnAL TOTAL , COMM. 75% REES. 25% TOTAL 100% TOTALS DECK AREA -~' . LEVELO 0 SF 0 SF 0 SF . 0 SF 0 SF 0 SF . 0 SF 0 SF 2 * ro LEVEL 1 2,588 SF 0 SF 2,588 SF 719 SF 236 SF 955 SF 3,543 SF 0 SF k ZI LEVEL 2 3,234 SF 0 SF 3,234 SF 209 SF 68 SF 277 SF 3,511 SF 0 SF ti# 04.20.2012 CONCEPTUAL IssueÂ· LEVEL 3 0 SF 1908 SF 1,908 SF 0 SF 0 SF 0 SF 1,908 SF 376.0 SF 132 5 DESIGN REVIEW APPLICATION TOTAL 5,822 SF 1,908 SF 7,730 SF 928 SF 304 SF 1,232 SF _ 8,962 SF _ 376.0 SF . iii 05.30.2012 NEIGHBORHOOD ag: OUTREACH 3- 06.07.2012 CONCEPTUAL COMMERCIAL FLOOR AREA ham DESIGN REVIEW @32 RE-SUBMITTAL 1 TOTAL FLOOR AREA 5,822 SF 928 SF 6,750 SF 1.50:1 26 . 07.03.2012 CONCEPTUAL &6 8 DESIGN REVIEW ' ALLOWABLE FLOOR AREA 6,750 SF 1.50'1 *00- RE-SUBMITTAL 2 RZE 08.01.2012 GMQS DIFFERENCE - UNDER/(OVER) 0 SF 88- APPLICATION 04.08.2013 FINAL COMMERCIAL RES]DENTIAL FLOOR AREA O 0 DESIGN REVIEW TOTAL FLOOR AREA 1,908 SF 304 SF 2,212 SF O- DECK AREA COUNTING TOWARD FLOOR AREA 38 38 SP Â° 0 0 9 TOTAL FLOOR AREA 2,250 SF 0.50:1 ALLOWABLE FLOOR AREA 2,250 SF 0.50:1 DIFFERENCE - UNDER/(OVER) (0) SF TOTAL BUILDING FLOOR AREA TOTAL BUILDING FLOOR AREA 8,072 SF 1,232 SF 9,304 SF 2.07:1 ALLOWABLE TOTAL FLOOR AREA 11,250 SF 2.50:1 DIFFERENCE - UNDER/(OVER) 1,946 SF ' 601 EAST HYMAN AVENUE NET LEASABLE (COMMERCIAL) AREA NET LJVABLE (RESIDENTIAL) AREA .t28&22 LEVEL 0 1,816 SF LEVEL 0 0 SF Zone District Cl 601 EAST HYMAN AVENUE ASPEN, CO 81611 LEVEL1 2,497 SF LEVEL 1 OSF ' Property Size 4,500 SF LEVEL 2 3,004 SF LEVEL 2 0 SF Maximurn Free-Market LEVEL 3 0 SF LEVEL 3 1,801 SF Multifamily Housing 2,250 SF TOTAL 7,317 SF TOTAL 1,801 SF Allowable Residential Deck 338.0 SF PROJECT NO: 21213.00 SHEET TITLEÂ· PROPOSED FLOOR AREA SUMMARY SCALE: AO.3-1 11 -TE I *332- EE e,9 34 e 0.5 4.9006 f 970.544.3473 92Â£ 1 808 608 J Â£2Â£ '8 rle rowland + broughton architecture and urban design 234 e. hopkinsave. 3377 blake st. 106 aspen.co 81 611 denver, co 80205 970.544.9006 v 303.308.1373 v 970.544.3473 f 303.308.1375 f r.....Im/,el ap,n-.Â©lsâ€ž Consultarh: OUSTAN! CLAUSON ASSOCIATES iNc V 61*WSEE#14"A-- -< -/1.9.. ./A#-/..fsilill'll/lillimillill'll- r li.'*.4,4 ..."..wi. p i.04'.â€¢i.vi' 0.,4â€¢ - e -1 43 6 'll.-6 -I'..li04&7* 4- i ...';Â·23.1.970/:0 .. 14***SÂ·<c. â€¢â€¢,w.s{@FIDâ€¢nk,8.0.1, =2 1 ~t.1-<~Iro I./ IÂ¥~ - =0Â·#i . ke H U.-. all.*;& ji*â€¢-' . .-, Â¥ IssueÂ· - 04.20.2012 CONCEPTUAL DESIGN REVIEW 4< * - I- 6 x - 1~~VIFI =*,au.:,i.iL=&6,1:.I-- . W-d . _ APPLICATION 05.30.2012 NEIGHBORHOOD OUTREACH 1, , Â· 06.07.2012 CONCEPTUAL DESIGN REVIEW -- - RE-SUBMITTAL 1 07.03.2012 CONCEPTUAL DESIGN REVIEW VIEW LOOKING NORTHEAST RE-SUBMITTAL 2 VIEW LOOKING SOUTHEAST 08.01.2012 GMQS APPLICATION 04.08.2013 FINAL COMMERCIAL DESIGN REVIEW 1.Rk $* i 601 EAST HYMAN Â¥ 1 - Uk. 4 AVENUE i 5 , . . 4 . 6 2>,0: , A. . Â¥1-0~~0 ASPEN, CO 81611 '" 9 601 EAST HYMAN AVENUE ' u 11_ 4':- -r 1 - '574 40.111~11,~1 ,:>*44' ...6.~Im~- -Il.- - . 2.4* . - 1,01 ... 44/: Â·p ---- -- 1=519 92!- 4%1% p - 1 ... EL .... - 1, - 14/////gr~~//////////////W~IÂ·,0,,,MQAÂ· 1-------IE 21213.00 PROJECT NOÂ· **:/.Eaal<*///Â·2. - SHEET TITLE: -S~~a*i,2&4 ~, /f . - Â«.le*,fs, ..~ .03~~~ - 0 - PROPOSED ; MODEL VIEW LOOKING SOUTHWEST VIEW LC]OKING WEST RENDERING SCALE AO.5 t'IEMÂ£.,A-#=M0+EN.F%/-1 -UX-/ M<....r'..1,0 8/ M<,MIF./.irpll- *p rl/VeR.-il rle '.-I * . r < . r- + 14 Â· . .5.: .4 - . 1 - rowland + broughton architecture and urban design 234 e. hopluns m 3377 blake /. 105 aspen,Â©081611 denver,Â©080205 970.544.9006 v 303.308.1373 v 970.544.3473 f 303.308.1375 f 9, 1. t. Consultara ~USTAN CLAUSON ASSOCIATES,K 4/ ..h /0 .. Atp.+ Color./ 8,6t: , i.,IllÂ·234 1...2.4628 lii"loctic.....'I -I......... , - '.4, 1. &tb.14. A lip 46- A-3~low Issue: I 1 * 9 1 -1 t ~1 Â· 41, 1 21 h . .1 '1 -1 f - a------ 1 , . I 4. * ._hir.0 6 1/. ' : D - ,-Ii--Ill--Ill--Illillill-Fll ./.9 - 1 - PETERSEN TEGL KOLUMBA BRICK, LAP PATTERN GLASS STOREFRONT BRICK WITH STEEL ACCENTS ~ Â· . -4:..9, *1 F .-Â·&:ti'.-i.l-' ', Â·.~~ , . '90,6 k .~I'l,-,- .A. Dm - L 601 EAST HYMAN /~,0. 7 1 -'.1- *I.... . ... ft 61.,3.. AVENUE 7. I ~h. ...51,4. . 45, I - 601 EAST HYMAN AVENUE .. a.O 2, ASPEN, CO 81611 k I r 4 ...P: . '9*1 Â£ :?,42.3.4 : 9.mli VÂ·t 1/.I 'flÂ¥=? , 6.-i~141 1 I. 91,%Ut & 92 1 1 9.% 1.41 - -- i PROJECT NO < ' 1 21213.00 Â·0Â¥2 -- f SHEET TITLE ~ PROPOSED MATERIALS aÂ·: Â· SCALEÂ· GLASS STOREFRONTWITH WOOD ACCENTS LAMINATE PANELS VATH WOOD FINISH AO.5a pagi#Bel#EEP; CÂ·0*120*-1,ll..-k--M rP rowland + broughton architecture and urban design 234 e. hopkins ave. 3377 blake st, 106 aspen. 0081611 denver,co 80205 970.544.9006 v 303.308.1373 v 970.544.3473 T 303.308.1375 f Cor,swilants 2, STAN CLAUSON ASSOCIATES m W"IpÂ¢.r~Oe~1~~ ~11.* IM ~Il~M m-41Â·h. A.pen.Coli.ad'Cin:i :,970;0;S 232~ rÂ·~70'10 ~6~6 ~ n li~ 1 -0- L=7--1=====9 V ./.Â«2'Â»r'.0* -/$'a'/IllÂ¢.lom 2 | .. 4 1 1- 1- 1- 1. 1-- 1 < 40 003 1-1 1 T-1 1.17 1 T-1 - - 1 111% - SPRING ST. 1 1 1 I liUMIERS 1 bueÂ· ! - 1 - ====:. :ill 04.20.2012 CONCEPTUAL DESIGN REVIEW I 1 05.30.2012 NEIGHBORHOOD i i APPLICATION / 1 \ HYMAN AVE. ELEVATION STUDY ~ OUTREACH A0.6-SCALET-357.-iii:~ 06.07.2012 CONCEPTUAL 1 DESIGN REVIEW RE-SUBMITTAL 1 A/5..T..El#~ 07.03.2012 CONCEPTUAL DESIGN REVIEW 1 1 RE-SUBMITTAL 2 I 08.01.2012 GMQS APPLICATION I 04.08.2013 FINAL COMMERCIAL 1 1 DESIGN REVIEW ---------1 11 CIZEZZ] 1 1 1 11 M Il 11 1 1 11 It 1~47\41 11 H 11 11 1 1111 !111 11 It 11 11 11 0.'liu lillit lili Id lili 11 11 11 11 11 11 11 It 11 11 11 It It 11 1 ... lili It 11 It 11 11 11 11 11 11 11 11 . 11 11 11 It --- - . 111 11,1,1 17 11 lili lili 11 11 11 11 11 11 11 11 11 lili 11 "11 It it 11 11 11 11 1. 11 11 11 1, 11 16,1.11=<1 11 - lili 11 11 11 11 11 GALIEM,2 11 11 - DC) ~ k " H H M â€ž It It 11 11 11 11 iT It ~~ $1 tl l 1 11 1 11 It It 11 11 ....1 11 it 11 11 11 11 11 0.6,11'I I I 1111 It 11 11 11 111. 1, 11 11 11 1+F~.4-11 11 ~ ~ il 11 11 11 11 re"Mi Bi i, ti H H H IL | 6 ..9 It 11 11 11 11 11 11 It -0/7 Il Il 11 11 Il lili Il lili 11 Il 11 11 11 4. . 11 11 11 11 11 L. 11 It 11 11 11 11 It 11 11 11 11 11 11 11 11 \Â·--loc, 11 1! 11 11 !1 It 11 11 11 It 11 11 11 11 11 11 11 11 11 11 11 11 11 11 11 11 11 11.11 11~11 I! li 6 5000 : 0 2 \ 1- ..1 b '1 1 11 11 11 11 11 11 11 11 1, 11 11 11 11 111 11 11 - lilli 11 11 11 11 It 11 11 11 11 11 11 11 11.11 11 11 9 - Ell' 11 11 11 11 11 11 M H H H Mw-: Or.- . 2 11 1 1 9.-9.0 9 i I lilli ~! 11 11 11 11 11 frit 11 li 11 ii ii ii â€ž i, li â€žit : ,i '11 11 2 / 11 11. .6.81.1 11 11 11 11 11 11 11 11 11 11.11 ;11 11 1 1 1 Â£--1.0 11 , 1 1 11 11 1 1 11 1,6/.1 1 44 - Â¥611 11 .- ..,1(b 1 =m//1 1 lili :1 601 EAST HYMAN ii i, ii ii :1 rr--I ! 11 i i *. ;, ii ~ I ACCESS 11 11 11 1|It 11 i~i , ii AVENUE 11 11 11 11 11 11 11 it 11 11 11 11 11 11 11 1,1 1 1 -klÂ· 'Â·Ii---ST.-F--. -813'of Elrvlrol LIFT . TT~EL=r ETT-, ,-1-=-1-1-- ENâ„¢f k ~ -, 11-4-Inlwr- gim. -, . ~ ~ 601 EAST HYMAN AVENUE L___3 1 - M 1 9 - O 4 /--0- I ASPEN, CO 81611 %,2 -y Â·0 j d. '- 1 1 / ' ' CIZE] ./ , 9 ,'1Â»62--' Â¢Ft, j.- - - ,-0- i Â£ 9 9 V Z 2' 7-1. @55 I -3:, #(3 ~:Gt 01 ~ if 31 titti;141 *-1~1% r fit \\ Â·6 * 8 4 1 1, 4 8 1. U # 4-*A NÂ· id B.~'4Â·i ,â‚¬ !YMANAV -5-r 4 .9, 99 19 41/9 4,2/9 3~1-~.fol~ 10 3 ty PROJECT NO' 21213.00 SHEET TITLE: PROPOSED HYMAN AVE. MASSING STUDY SCALE: 3/32" = 1'-0" f AO.6 4 09 9 49 + 9 00 8 84-7 i / 1 I 1, 3'-4- , 20'4 14'-6 1/7 , 30'-312 54 , 10* i , rowland + broughton 1 1 1 " ' ~| architecture and urban design 234 e. hopkns ave. 3377 blake st, 106 aspen,co 81611 denver,co 80205 970.544.9006 v 303.308.1373 v 970.544.3473 f 303.308.1375 f HYMAN AVENUE Consullants 7?STAN CLAUSON ASSOCIATES,IC t lin...,ip. 4â€¢/hlii,lul, p a.r'-' ...â€¢I ./1.1 1 4.2 .... 1 A,p.n. Co'.00 Hi. 1 <//20/42>2,2, I.9,0/:C,626 PROPER-rf LINE Issue: 04.20.2012 CONCEPTUAL DESIGN REVIEW APPLICATION ELEVATOR 4 05.30.2012 NEIGHBORHOOD ~-EQUIPMENT â€¢ OUTREACH / 06.07.2012 CONCEPTUAL U 1 DESIGN REVIEW RE-SUBMITTAL 1 07.03.2012 CONCEPTUAL JANITOR DESIGN REVIEW RE-SUBMITTAL 2 w APPLICATION 08.01.2012 GMQS Z F 04.08.2013 FINAL L -/ 9 COMMERCIAL COMMERCIAL 40 - DESIGN REVIEW ~ ~ELEVATOR III STAIR 1 4 TRANSFORMER P .1--7-- --1 L~ HALLWAY 4 T.O.FIN, FL. - 4.4 f 822 AND PAD ABOVE 111 : n lili Â· -3 -- il-ar ==1 2 1--1 C 47---U t -, r--1 4 - k----- 601 EAST HYMAN â‚¬ 9 lkÂ¢ v STAIR 2~ i ~ AVENUE CABLE/ WOMENS , , , MENS J MECHANICAL 9 11 0 UP ki - - -11, U-1 ~ IT. / AND PHONES 4 '-L_ -Â« 8 WATER . . ASPEN, co 81611 601 EAST HYMAN AVENUE PROJECT NO: 11 ~ j 21213.00 00 0 40 ~ ew/ 98 6 SHEET TITLE: 7 PROPOSED BASEMENT FLOOR PLAN SCALE: 3/16" = 1'-0" - PROPOSED < 1 j BASEMENT FLOOR PLAN < A2.0 j SCALE' 3/1 6-= 1'-7 PLAN TRUE A2.0 NORTH NORTH 238 S~ O/...T'./.0 =43'll:- 88 8 r.za'. ,-Ir rA 00 0 847 1 6 1 2gg 144 1/7 1 f f ' 30'-31/7 , 6'-G~ L ic'* , 1 1 ' f rowland + broughton architecture and urban design -. I 234 e. hop/ns ave. 3377 blake st, 106 4-- 1 liB /74 4-1---1 .. . 4 -444 : . 5 Â¢1 970.544,9006 7 303.308.1373 v 0 , aspen,co 81611 denver.co 80205 970.544.3473 f 303.308.1375 f '~.Tk 2 4, TA KA 3,- 4 '.dill:.1' .' ' .: '.. -F 5:.4:2:~'A': Â·~: 'I . 43 I. la p r ...1 .1 4 - -- %21% 6- . %. Â· Conslitants: I ... 4 1 -- 4. , 1 - $ .4 . 3 1- ~/ 4. r,>t J -~r~Â·ir.,v_ '~, .~02-~-,2 ' 4, r, ..~STAIN CLAUSON AMI];!REEE 4 044 ...153..~ ' I \ ~ 09Â»â‚¬.;Ch k /1.1 0 Â·â‚¬ ,~> Noilh Mdn SticEI A~n. Colo,ado 0,6,i -19.h - J )i- $~ J # g3,7 - K = , 17.-1 - F JI k vt 1,7." 2323 |+970'20.=8 0 7. /1 AA,/1/Â©Cl â€¢~I.lin~..DI .#......in,.{Dm 1 -r L P =7 ~ 1, 0-1 - 7 -r,4 - 01 r. /I o v SIDEWALK 0, ell 5 0 \11- 3*.fil#:/ M .12 -L-,Â·hi<CF >' \Â»425 3424011Nk g 932-=64-72,f IDÂ»906,113 " 1-2Â» 02/4 '-7 V 5Â¤97Rf*Â«7 PROPERTY LINE ,(-3.4 -1 Â·Â· >- " I -*. ' -3-- '72;- k I ./-- L-t'~IL*- 1 1 -CANOPY ABOVE Issue: BENOI 1 ,flf-1 'B~,11 1 ifil DESIGN REVIEW ! 04.20.2012 CONCEPTUAL U_--___ 11 APPLICATION U.-1 05.30.2012 NEIGHBORHOOD 2 R imtÂ»11 6 u 11 3 11 1-1 74.1 OUTREACH _ 06.07.2012 CONCEPTUAL R 99'-1*12-<2927 - REI-SUBMITTAL 1 DESIGN REVIEW 711 COMMERCIAL 07.03.2012 CONCEPTUAL 1 ! il & C.*-FOL w AND DESIGN REVIEW 2 o RESIDENTIAL 11! fi; ~1(10 A r LOBBY 08.01.2012 GMQS 9 i wl =i RE-SUBMITTAL 2 a 4 T.O. FIN. FL. APPLICATION ' 100-0 0 4 04.08.2013 FINAL 05 E -CUE] COMMERCIAL ~ 0 te COMMERCIAL fl - > 0 '91 - DESIGN REVIEW 4 ~ ~ELEVATOR Â¥ 9 124, 6 4 <1, 4.,- -3.' 1~ 31 -I UTILIPMETERS 1; Â»492 41463 ~51_321&41 21 -OPENING VW - -Â«3 GATE i'Â·-V Â· 7'LIM- 7 1 2 -~ 88Â» 21 STAIR 1 1,1 1 UP 4 t~~ il ~~--~-~~<LED TRASH,RECYCLING H HALL " TE_--4, I -%K.-- 601 EAST HYMAN NON-(30-M~Â»~cO~~-- -- UPCÂ»~ I. I BACK OF HOUSE OFFICES AVENUE FENCE AND GATE / L---- --30 2 TRANSFORMER r~~=Â» STAIR 2 |*QMENS~ ' , 'MENS; 1 AND PAD ON. 1 , 601 EAST HYMAN AVENUE CANOPY ABOVE ,=========::==, 1 1 ./1*w=**===:=. ASPEN, CO 81611 L----31 -Â·Â«Â»-8 PROPERTY UNE 1 1 1 11 1 PROJECT NO: 21213.00 66 1' 1' 6 0 90 0 0 SHEET TITLE PROPOSED LEVEL ONE FLOOR PLAN SCALEÂ· 3/16" = 1'-0" -' PROPOSED -----Â·Â·Â·Â·--- - - ( 1 j LEVEL ONE FLOOR PLAN ~ A2.1 j SCALE. 3/16" =1'4 PLAN TRUE A2.1 NORTH NORTH aa TIâ‚¬ I.-T~ ANDOES- INTEMT CO,T-ED 0.1 T- 0Â¤eu*ENT ~ â„¢E *~91-62/'fie~*;V.-556 I 1" ~Â·,7 0 40 pii, 62> 8 8 ~ '~~~' ra Y V i 84'-7 | Â· Â· ' 20-0Â· ~, 14-612'0 30-31/7 6'4' , 10'-Cr I, , rowland + broughton f 1 1 1 architecture and urban design 970.544-9006v 303.308.1373 v 234 e. hoplns ave. 3377 blake ' 106 aspen.co 81611 denver, co 80205 970.544.3473 1 303.308.1375f HYMAN AVENUE Cons'itants: 0 "STAN CLAUSON ASSOCIATES!.gc =44â€¢2 ./. Iâ€¢.01 /$-. Celo.,ac 8,6,, 'Val "7Ch".n" 1.970&,0,628 4-Nai .......MIng.il. -xa~la~n,0,4 com PROPERTY LINE [-1 --Â»Â»iD DESIGN REVtEW L r---1 r----1 Issue: 04.20,2012 CONCEPTUAL ~|| CANOPY BELOW APPLICATION * 05.30.2012 NEIGHBORHOOD - OUTREACH 1-- --- 06.07.2012 CONCEPTUAL I 1 DESIGN REVIEW RE-SUBMITTAL 1 07.03.2012 CONCEPTUAL DESIGN REVIEW RE-SUBMITTAL 2 08.01.2012 GMQS APPLICATION 04.08.2013 FINAL COMMERCIAL f ... DESIGN REVIEW 1 -- COMMERCIAL ~ ELEVATOR Â· /\ / T.O. FIN FL 9 113.0' i; ' 12 1 LOBBY ~ 1 & -- -8 STAIR 1 UP - In ~ -~7U~) TRANSFORMER- -- 1 AND PAD BELOW --- - -Z~ZI= C E--I =2 - -92 601 EAST HYMAN 1 6 uP-ill -- AVENUE U \WOMENS; ; MENS / [ ~ STAIR 2 L . 0Â»,rl CANOPY BELOW- DN o p'U J I - L.A.1 - 601 EAST HYMAN AVENUE ASPEN, CO 81611 11 ....CD 11 1 1 11 1 PROJECT NO' 21213-00 0 SHEET TITLE PROPOSED LEVEL TWO FLOOR PLAN SCALE: 3/16" = 1'-0" - PROPOSED ( 1 j LEVEL TWO FLOOR PLAN < A2.2 7 SCALE: 3/Â·le = 1'4 PLAN TRUE A2.2 NORTH NORTH Ba -R.. aN111 A.LbBdONd .0-,01 *12. 0 40 4,) 0) r . rn rn 1 V -, .-I *z rowland + broughton 14'-61 2' 30-3 VT , Str , 10-0" 4 1 1 1 1 ' 1 architecture and urban design 11 1 1 1 1 234/ hip//'"0 3377 blake st, 106 aspen,Â©081611 denver. 280205 970.544.9006v 303.308.1373 v 970.544.3473 f 303.308.1375 f HYMAN AVENUE Consultants: ~STAN CLAUSON ASSOCIATES:Ac / I..'.ili Ir/'Ii"uil.'ll'rl~,.illi .... t' 412 ho.th MIÂ® 5-~ A.pen. Co~crad, 0.6,1 I 3/970/2,2/3 f.9,04:/162' PROPERTY LINE 5 - r---1 r---1 r---1 r--1 -1 Is- GUEST GUEST 4 - EAVE ABOVE 04.20.2012 CONCEPTUAL BEDROOM |~ ~ BEDROOM ~- DESIGN REVIEW 7 1-7 rl #1 - - #2 APPLICATION ooF /\< 1 21 DINING h 11 1 13 E l 11 BELOW ~ t 05.30.2012 NEIGHBORHOOD tal < / 47/Xy/\Â»V// 1 r L-' ROOM J , 1 OUTREACH 1 4 1 1 -- --%70 06.07.2012 CONCEPTUAL t.-3 L.=3 Li ' 15 || - xÂ«Â«Â«/~\6349<9<~ - DESIGN REVIEW RE-SUBMITTAL 1 BLE = *042&99/,1,. >4429Â»9â‚¬>44*3> 3 fi~ RE-SUBMITTAL 2 07.03.2012 CONCEPTUAL DESIGN REVIEW 3 ~ CLOSET CLOSET 08.01.2012 GMQS 37 LiI//' ,\ I//1 73 APP\*LASON ~---U-Â» 13 1 =/44441<34 1 R Lf.3 04.08.2013 FINAL EAVE ABOVE I ~ - COMMERCIAL e,OM rtia - _3_L_ a\M Cni --5*QfE)-- 1 Lori -0 DESIGN REVIEW -Â·-- - --b 1 -~ 1 BATH #13 LBATH #2 n r HALL 344<%<8,44,1,4 PECK#1 031 1 U < UVING 0 -~4RN FL r-LAUNDRY ELEVATOR .nx. 4 4, $/ L.~1 r=1 - -'=-(3 \ 11 ~ ' MASTEit ~ ~ -1 11- -r] 4-4--1 - P4%8>23)4%6% &;14&(&@4;3Â· 1 5 - ~ 1 'J 4*Â»>*Â»>Â», eÂ»/RS:FPÂ» 1 El MASTER G 1/3 0 ~.-3 BEDROOM 11 MASTER - - ___ ..-,1 - ~~ BATH - - TRANSFORMER- AND PAD BELOW ROOFOVERSTAIRn 1 ED Ul EN a *= --Â«3 - 0111_11-1 +~ --- - 601 EAST HYMAN 1 - . L#) 0 --/ <2:(Aic.i..#..Â«ri..<C.34. - - AVENUE - ~~-*44*~~ KITCHEN (1 3 IL-Z) %420<,h<4<,)<4<4__ ~ 1 - DECK #2 -' - CANOPY BELOW--Â·- ~ DN o |~ | ~ || U | RE~. F__ ~~*~* - - - OVEN 11 'In' ~~~~~~5~~~~~ ~ Â·Â· ASPEN, CO 81611 601 EAST HYMAN AVENUE 1 1 PROJECT NO: ' 6 - 21213.00 44 A & rn SHEET TITLE: PROPOSED LEVEL THREE FLOOR PLAN SCALE: 3/16" = 1'-0" - PROPOSED -. -4- / 1 j LEVEL THREE FLOOR PLAN <A2.3 7 SCALE 3/16' =1'4 PLAN TRUE A2.3 NORTH NORTH Be i,~1[~ I-....... G....IÂ·..*â€ž,cii.c=, *//Fj/~*. 0\7\39\)79/ 44< ..... i 00 0 h 3 4, 0, 00 0 '1 1 + 84.7 , 34' ~ 20'q 14'-61/7 30-312 64 , 10'-0~ 1 1 1 1 1 ' i rowland + broughton architecture and urban design | | F | i | aspen~co81611 denver,co 80205 234 e. hopkins ave. 3377 blake st, 106 970.544.9006 v 303.308.1373 Â¥ 970.544.3473 f 303.308.1375 f Cor,Bullarts: 27STAN CLAUSON ASSOCIATESÂ·uc / lindi.@pili.I'.i:i.0,â€¢r!./..â€žIÂ·, .... A.2..../.-1 4~.Coloi.,0,6,t &a tz:Z::2:U.:r'lt:,p~..â€ž- -1-Ul DESIGN REVIEW 0420.2012 CONCEPTUAL U APPLICATION GREEN ROOF BELOW 4 05.30,2012 NEIGHBORHOOD r-OUTLINE OF BUILDING BELOW OUTLINE OF BUILDING BELOW----- OUTREACH i \ 06.07.2012 CONCEPTUAL - DESIGN REVIEW RE-SUBMITTAL 1 07.03.2012 CONCEPTUAL DESIGN REVIEW GREEN ROOF BELOW RE-SUBMITTAL 2 08.01.2012 GMQS APPLICATION 2 h 04.08.2013 FINAL GREEN ROOF BELOW DECK #1 BELOW i " COMMERCIAL ...1 Â¥ DESIGN REVIEW L .. MEMBRANE ROOF-, LELEVATOR ROOP-* . el F 4 fal -1-1 GREEN ROOF BELOW 4 0-- ~ *~g--OUTLINE OF BUILDING BELOW -_ __~___~ h 601 EAST HYMAN E-TAIR ROCFBELON -PARAPET 1 1 AVENUE DECK #2 BELOW GREEN ROOF BELOW 601 EAST HYMAN AVENUE GREEN ROOF BELOW ASPEN, CO 81611 | | | 21213.00 PROJECT NO' * D A A 00 1 SHEET TITLEÂ· PROPOSED ROOF PLAN - PROPOSED SCALEÂ· 3/16" = 1'-0" < 1 j ROOF PLAN ( A2.4 ~ SCRE 3/16'=1Â·4 PLAN TRUE A2.4 NORTH NORTH 2 Ba i 00 48 3 0 El) rowland + broughton architecture and urban design 23â€¢te. hopkinsave. 3377 blake st, 106 970.544.9006 v 303.308 1373 v 970.544.3473 f 303.308,1375 f 1 19.-6- 1 7.Â¢ 1 Itc' 10Â·-0- aspen, co 81611 denver,co 80205 , i | ~~ ELEVATOR OVERRUN (BEYOND) ALLOWABLE ELEVATOR OVERRUN 1 - - - - ---- - 1 PAINTED METAL PLATE I r IT.O,HT,MAX Con.ullantsÂ· LAMINIATE PANELS. WOOD FINISH ___________________- ~~STAN CLAUSONASSOCIATES,NE T.Q.BOOF ~~ *i, 1,0,â€¢h Mill Se,em AL,en. C0i01â€¢co m 135'-Cr "m,0.-,32) 1 *0 1625 |-'ll.*Im -**, 47' PARAPET WITH 0.*0*'** 0--1 METAL FLASHING 1 4 1 - T.O. FIN. FL 1 n .: ', Â· LEVELTHREE 0 -1 r. 1 .1 1 , 1 1 124-0' KOLUMBA BRICK DESIGN REVIEW e 44 -23 ' .mÂ« " Issue: 2.139,-:Pr)L R.0 2.9 PETERSEN TEGL 04.20.2012 CONCEPTUAL . r--11 4 05.30.2012 NEIGHBORHOOD r . - APPLICATION OUTREACH â‚¬Â°,Â· + ~75>itt*tÂ°= >1 : . L-=11 -. ; L.-1 : ~::::c - L-7-1 06.07.2012 CONCEPTUAL T.O. FIN. FL DESIGN REVIEW 4 RE-SUBMITTAL 1 METAL CLAD N 07.03.2012 CONCEPTUAL - 7 Â· râ€¢--=' 11 - CANOPY 0 9 - RE-SUBMITTAL 2 DESIGN REVIEW f 1 Â· EGRESS STAIR 08.01.2012 GMQS -: --r 1, DOOR 0 ': 1 4 APPLICATION \ 1 1,1 04.08.2013 FINAL - i-t~-Â«ji ' 1 1 1..1 4.- w IF. bri COMMERCIAL LIXMaN-822!WE 1 . 00 / 4 51'4 ! mm,1 21Â· DESIGN REVIEW / 1 M ,1 112 _ LEVEL ONE T.O. FIN. FL -3004* 1 -COMMERCIAL STOREFRONT TRANSFORMER BEHIND NON- COMBUSTIBLE FENCEVW GATES 1 DECORATIVE WOOD UTILITY ENTRY VW 1 ENTRY FRAME STEEL PANELABOVE 1 1 1 1 601 EAST HYMAN T.O. FIN. FL BASEMENT 1 J AVENUE 601 EAST HYMAN AVENUE ASPEN, CO 81611 - PROPOSED ( 1 j WEST ELEVATION /77-'72 PROJECT NO: IN#/fe- 21213,00 /0 / - / - 1=.- 1- --1 1 SHEET TITLE 1.12*. PROPOSED EXTERIOR A4.1 ELEVATION SCALE: 3/16" = 1'-0" ~ rs zi ME:~fS&/alitz, BRICK LAP SIDING WITH PLATE STEEL ACCENTS GLASS STOREFRONT WOOD ACCENT LAMNATE PANELS WITH WOOD FINISH 00~.NeÂ·-0-n/Ak.~ecÂ·.1.- ..uRBâ€¢~ CES- .4â€¢u/ET.I. '-#:..:Il......-In~-5~C- PROPERTY LINE â€ž0Â·Bt PROPERTY LINE t.8--M. architecture and urban design rowland + broughton 883 + [B] (Al 234 e. hopkins ave. 3377 blake st, 106 n 'h I aspen,co 81611 denver,co 80205 1 1 [ 1 970.544.9005 v 303.308.1373 v 1 970.544.3473 f 303.308.1375 f \ ALLOWABLE ELEVATOR OVERRUN 1 ELEVATOR OVERRUN I T.O. HT, MAX A Coneultants 1 7-7- -,-- .I.--:- -- ------------------0-*------------------------------------I-------____---_ IESTAN CLAUSON ASSOCIATES m: ' I.'.- 4Â·.ITI:Â·Il pl*~i-*.r/,Ii, '.,1. T.O. ROOF & I --1 ---#- 11 li-.--- &011.11~9,20 4,, '010,~Ces.61, , - ' 1 1354 ./.1,1 9.:.Â·2323 4.....'Â·MS LAMINATE PANELS, WOOD FINISH .,2............ .....:a...0/ 0 1 M )1* ' ----- 19 Qui -- - Â· Â· - 47'PARAPET WITÂ» 1 METAL CAP 1 - U U PETERSENTEGL 1.1 1 T.O. FIN. FL. KOLUMBA BRICK ' _ LEVEL THREE 1 -- 4.1*ne 124'4 04.20.2012 CONCEPTUAL 1 -4 ..2.43Â¥ issue: 2 DESIGN REVIEW = 4 APPLICATION 1 ..0 0 0 0 1 Â» tf '. f:12;R.:U-, \ OUTREACH | ::33(, 6 i ' ant, 05.30.2012 NEIGHBORHOOD 11. 06.07.2012 CONCEPTUAL r 11Â·Â·Â·4-4, '42; T.O. FIN. FL. LEVEL TV'.0 DESIGN REVIEW . 1 1. .1 1 1 - 1 1- 113'-0" 27 RE-SUBMITTAL 1 ' 2â‚¬ 'al U.-va % Â·Â·> 07,03,2012 CONCEPTUAL 1 1 - - 11 11 1 0 1 DESIGN REVIEW -- 4.v'~117 74+2- RE-SUBMITTAL 2 ,- * 0 0 0 EGRESS CANOPY 0 0 / , -- 0 0 ~'~~''~ APPLICATION BEYOND 08.01.2012 GMQS / \ . I $ : / \ NON-COMBUSTIBLE 04.08.2013 FINAL FENCE BEYOND 1 1 1 0 DESIGN REVIEW 3 \ / : 0 0 1111 \ / HUME \/0 0 0 .. , COMMERCIAL \ / BENCH '06% BENCH Y T.O. AN. FL 1- I LEVEL ONE RESIDENTIAL AND DECORATIVE WOOD DECORATIVEÂ¥,000 1 COMMERCIAL LOBBY -COMMERCIAL STOREFRONT- 1 ENTRY FRAME ENTRY FRAME 1 1 BENCH -COMMERCIAL STOREFRONT- 1 1 UL EI 601 EAST HYMAN T. O. FIN. FL. BASEMENT AVENUE 87=3Â· - PROPOSED < 1 j NORTH ELEVATION ~Uj--ia=--*--Ey------ 601 EAST HYMAN AVENUE ASPEN, CO 81611 /> * PROJECT NO: 21213.00 e - It ..I %/.//-P./... -... 1 â€¢l/ .. /- SHEET TITLE: 'GU ll Ill PROPOSED - l'' I- EXTERIOR P i., y ELEVATION , SCALE. 3/16" = 1'-0" FlÂ£154.Jpmhallilliarts/6,/Mifi libill"Imir<+1IIIZZYIIIIA -# Lic A4.2 d 'Immillillillilliw =.Â§=2====:612~ 1 in =Â£09> 0 - H BRICK LAPSIDING WITH PLATE STEEL ACCENTS GLASS STOREFRONT WOOD ACCENT LAMINATE PANELS VATH WOOD FINISH "C~Pe~~~/10170 -./.ATVT../0.-.....~~G,CS ...... 12 Wf PROPERTY LINE PROPERTY LINE 3Nll Al.WadOWd .DÂ·Â£ L .0.~L S~-~2121-*a-r.1 rle rowland + broughton 9 00 0 64 architecture and urban design 234 e. hopkins ave. 3377 blake st.106 970.544.9006v 303.308.1373 v aspen,Â©081611 denver, co 80206 970.544.3473f 303.308.1375 f 11 1 .f ALLOWABLE ELEVATOROVERRUN ' ELEVATOR OVERRUN 1 T.0. HT. MAX . Con/Ldtants: 136:0" 1 / ~,nd~ill..riâ€¢..1.i' Ill.Il' I.1 '/,d,~ ~STAN CLAUSON ASSOCIATES iNc ' ' '~ TPROOF ; . I I@9 412 1!010~ MI~ 5!9~ ASpn. Celll@~la 4,61, 335'-01' f 4<*BAÂ·,i:i I,ioâ€¢.0Â·,6.â€¢ 1 1 , 1 ~-.-1./. -rann./.1 i -PAINTED METAL PLATE 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 111 1 J '1 , '1 '1*, 0 0 # 1 ~ 1 11 ~1 1 1 1 1 1 4 1 , 1 11 . 47Â· PARAPET WITH . 'lilli . METAL CAP 1 1 k 1 , 1 14 1 1- i r , T.O. FIN FL ---- ~â„¢REE A % 124'-(7 f * ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' 0 0 ~~ irtâ‚¬3 KOLUMBA BRICK Issue rtÂ· '-Â·# .Â»A_ DESIGN REVIEW 1 111 11 '1 '1 , 1.1 '1 '1 7, '1 '1 40 -r, y IN+N.32* 04.20.2012 CONCEPTUAL - .9/,#96 4- 4 5 4 APPLICATION PETERSEN TEGL 11111111111111111/,LI'LI'l '11 1 1." 8t 05.30.2012 NEIGHBORHOOD 1 11 1 1 1 111 ~Ar,-1 19. 1 --Â«94 . OUTREACH 1 J 1/ 06.07.2012 CONCEPTUAL . T.O. FIN. FL " .A.- 0 I .t. 1 LEVEL TVK] A . DESIGN REVIEW â€¢,6. Â·*NI , Â· .e_~~~~-00 m# f b RE-SUBMITTAL 1 1.1 1 11 . & 07.03.2012 CONCEPTUAL Ill -RESIDENTIAL AND h COMMERCIALLOBBY - 04.08.2013 FINAL CANOPY COMMERCIAL DESIGN REVIEW LEVELONE 1 , , . 1 11 1 1,1: 1 1 1 Â·Â·Â· HYMAN AVENUE 7.0. FIN. FL 1 1 , 1 1 1 too'Â·0" 7 ... 1 1 1 1 11 11 11 -+........+.......+I......- 601 EAST HYMAN 1 X i T.O. AN. FL AVENUE - . -------- -8-ME,Z= 4 5# 601 EAST HYMAN AVENUE ASPEN, CO 81611 PROPOSED EAST ELEVATION A43 3/16- =1'4 PROJECT NO: + i L. 21213.00 & /11 PROPOSED -,L EXTERIOR 1 1 1 . 0 *972 DESIGN REVIEW ..243 4 / g 08.01.2012 GMQS :{ f SHEET TITLE ELEVATION ~1$14-4 - p , 9 SCALE: 3/16- =1'-0 E 9- 6 1 A4.3 1, i. / zqi/.irmi . i f.+4 .~.1 -- 40#lf,>2 2,â‚¬ r 2 7 .-. Ndi ./-41 BRICK LAP SIDING WITH PLATE STEEL ACCENTS GLASS STOREFRONT WOOD ACCENT LAMINATE PANELS V0TH WOOD FINISH RE-SUBMITTAL 2 4 APPLICATION . -- , 0/1 - ..9 F - I ...la.//I'lli~ luti PROPERTY LINE ~-P-, /*,*ill-cs*-,~el~0~.-m-.,1.~-r.4 0 W-- rowland + broughton architecture and urban design 30 m 970.544.900/v 303.308.1373 v 0 0 0 3377 blake st, 106 f aspen,CO 81611 der,ver,co 80205 970+544.3473 f 303.308.1375 f ALLOWABLE ELEVATOR OVERRUN i i ELEVATOROVERRUN T.O. HT. MAX I Coneuttants: 1 I~ STAN CLAUSON ASSOCIATES iNG _TO. ROOF 4...0-/V eom.--.;611 135Â·e :.9./2,Â·32' 1 ~70/20 d I./5/.4.014.0,9 1 PAINTED METAL Â· 1 LAMINATE PANELS. WOOD FIN]SH PLATE + 0/ \ 0 42- LAMINATE PANEL PARAPET W/METAL CAP T.O. AN. FL ~4 ---- 124'4 LEVELTHREE Issue: PETERSEN TEGL 4 *Â» KOLUMBA BRICK -t 72Â«79 ~ DESIGN REVIEW 04.20.2012 CONCEPTUAL 4 APPLICATION 8 05.30.2012 NEIGHBORHOOD I *B, '44, 1 -- OUTREACH ~ --- -- - ---~ 06.07.2012 CONCEPTUAL ' 418*47*' 273 T.O. FIN. FL LEVEL TWO DESIGN REVIEW . 4* 1, 6 1 ve j W tls'-0- 4 RE-SUBMITTAL 1 1 07.03.2012 CONCEPTUAL DESIGN REVIEW RE-SUBMITTAL 2 i, 08.01.2012 GMOS METALCLAD EGRESS " STAIR CANOPY APPLICATION - 04.08.2013 FINAL NONCOMBUSTIBLE COMMERCIAL FENCE AT TRANSFORMER i DESIGN REVIEW HUNTERAVENUE ~ T.O. FIN. FL. LEVEL ONE 10[ya f 1--41.----~------------ ~ 1 1 601 EAST HYMAN I T.O. FIN. FL BASEMENT AVENUE 824 601 EAST HYMAN AVENUE ASPEN, CO 81611 - PROPOSED i / 1 ) SOUTH ELEVATION ty 3/le= 1Â·-0Â· , 24./ 1/Ji= I Ii<pa~ ~I'll/AW, PROJECT NOÂ· 21213.00 /- - SHEET TITLE PROPOSED EXTERIOR ELEVATION SCALEÂ· 3/16" = 1'-0" #Ak - 4 q A4.4 *9*,9.---liwel*FO i BRICK LAP SIDING WITH PLATE STEEL ACCENTS GLASS STOREFRONT WOOD ACCENT LAMINATE PANELS WTH WOOD FINISH ~2../*..: *p#/ C.'..,/Iro r ",mi mij. 81 -- -ar- D. C'A#1'1#Sr1-V~~*0.-.--. mmil- I. rowland + broughton architecture and urban design 234 e. hopkins ave 3377 blake st, 106 aspen,co 81611 denver, Â¢0 %205 970.544,9006. 303.308.1373 v 970.544.3473 f 303.308.1375 f 00 3 4 0 00 am 00 0 :1 1 ' 1 44'-Or ~ 44'-7 COMSLdtarlh 1 ! 4Â·4 19-6" 74' 3'-0" ' 1C.5' Â·UNSTAN CLAUSON ASSOCIATES{uc 10'-0Â· 1= 19'-e 44 4~ 4 4 4 h- -=tiâ„¢ A,pen..do 0.6,1 i 4 4' 4 4' 1 e-i,~2~.pl~i..,em -,41,4,com +**M/*-0 | ALLOWABLE ELEVATOR OVERRUN | --- ----- -I- 1 1 1 TO. HT. MAX . T.O. HT, MAX 6 | 136â€¢2 ~r 136'-0" f T.O. ROOF 1 , B T.OROOF 4 s , | - - - 135'-7 7 -J - - 135'4 7 0 1-ue: 1 _ - - - - _ 04.20.2012 CONCEPTUAL 1 DECK#2 DESIGN REVIEW' U GUEST 4 CL / . __~44"- t: 05.30.2012 NEIGHBORHOOD - 4 APPLICATION / LIVING DINING | - BEDROOM a ' BATH #1 HALL ~BEDROOM 06.07.2012 CONCEPTUAL -- OUTREACH ROOM ROOM I #1 \ KITCHEN F.P. 1 < Ipt T O. FIN. FL DESIGN REVIEW T.O. FIN. FL. LEVEL THREE J . * RE-SUBMITTAL 1 A - LEVELIHREE 1 , 124'4Â» 7 ' 07.03.2012 CONCEPTUAL 124'-0" 7 ' * 1 - DESIGN REVIEW RE-SUBMITTAL 2 1 1 1 / 08.01.2012 GMOS \ 4 APPLICATION / \ , 4 04.08.2013 FINAL 1 4 1 / \ ie ' COMMERCIAL MENS COMMERCIAL / , DESIGN REVIEW - 1 1 1 T.O. FIN. FL T.O. FIN. FL. \ V --- |Eve,TWO 1 5 COMMERCIAL I _ _ LEVEL TWO 1 , 1 + 1134/ f " 4 4 - 1134 7 14 1 1 & N % . 1 1 11'~ 1 /U____ 1 1 1 1 1 /\ 1 1 2 \ / \-3 1 / 1 COMMERCIAL < / 1 1% / COMMERCIA. / \ 00 / = !)Af 7-= 1 \ / LEVELONE A / I I \ / TO. FIN. FL \ T.O. FIN. FL. 1 , V - 100'-Cr f ~ Â· Â· E? 1 1 601 EAST HYMAN F AVENUE 1 - * 2, b A 601 EAST HYMAN AVENUE T - / \ ASPEN, CO 81611 \ COMMERCIAL \ COMMERCIAL \ 1 HALLWAY MENS / \ / T.O. Afl FL T.o. FIN. FL. 1 1% 11 - - BASEI'8~ ~ ' BASEMENT 1 . 1 4 82'4' f w i 1- r-- I li 0 t=1 L 1 /1 i 1 m PROJECTNO: 21213.00 riÂ·~ SECTION A r.fh SECTION B SHEET TITLE PROPOSED BUILDING SECTIONS SCALE: 3/16" = 1'-0" A5.1 rp-= 2~lize /4 e.g 16Â·-4- , 2-E , 9-r '1Â·-5 / 9-7 Za, \ 1//\\ -CKE. PROPERTY LINE I Rk -*- rowland + broughton architecture and urban design 234 e. hopkins ave. 3377 blake st, 106 aspen,Â¢081611 denver,co 80205 970.544.9006v 303.308.1373v 970.544.3473 f 303.308.13751 00 GÂ® 0 ConsultirAs ~STAN CLALISON ASSOCIATESiuc ' 84-7 Mt / 412 ....9 St,teÂ¢ I./'.Coll... B,6/ 1 1 1 1 \/1/94Â·83 1.m/oâ€¢:e /2~ *I-..n,InsÂ·.cm -I.$,irla,i.il.n 1/ 3/1 / 26-7 14-612 Fairr 6-0,1 1, 10,4 f 1 ff 1 1 1 ALLOWABLE ELEVATOR OVERRUN 1 -- - li 1 T.O. HT. MAX A . 136'-0~ ' T.O. ROOF J. . , 135'-0' 7 ' IssueÂ· 04.20.2012 CONCEPTUAL DESIGN REVIEW 2 \ APPLICATION 05.30.2012 NEIGHBORHOOD / - OUTREACH GREEN ROOF DECK #1 / f HALL --f ' 06.07.2012 CONCEPTUAL 311Â«>30<35/*~<1<<mÂ«<qx I f--1- ' f' I n ~~~ FÂ·PÂ· 1 1 DESIGN REVIEW 44*4-Pr#%4. 16Fri ZE--1 i * E 1 j -- LEMELTHREE 1 . I 07.03.2012 CONCEPTUAL ' L_Jim I .-1 ELEVATOR i / RE-SUBMITTAL 1 TO. FIN. FL 1244 7 DESIGN REVIEW RE-SUBMITTAL 2 ,~= 7â€¢ . - 08.01.2012 GMOS i ~ ~ ~~- APPLICATION \ I 4 04.08.2013 FINAL F COMMERCIAL / 1 LOBBY ; 4 COMMERCIAL / DESIGN REVIEW :l ' T.O. FIN. FL LÂ©/EL TWO 1 . 113-0' f .4 = A /\ M COMMERCIAL ' \ COMMERCIAL ~ ~~ COMMERCIAL 1 1 AND \\ 00 // || ' 1 'RESIDENTIAL LOBBY / T.O. FIN. FL. --_ LEVELONE :~ 100-G' . I C-' 601 EAST HYMAN AVENUE HALLWAY 2 601 EAST HYMAN AVENUE = ASPEN, CO 81611 COMMERCIAL \ TO. FUL FL - - BASEMENT A ' 82-1 7 - L_ W E L 0 2121100 PROJECT NO: r73 SECTION C SHEET TITLE' PROPOSED BUILDING SECTIONS SCALE: 3/16" = 1'-0" A5.2 IhillI16f42 99 9 99 9 D /11 rowland + broughton U V architecture and urban design 234 /. hopkinsave. 3377 blake st, 106 aspen,co 81611 denver, co 80205 970.544.9006v 303.308.1373v 970.544.3473 f 303.308.1375 f 1 1 1 1 11 1 1 11 1 Consultants: "'L-*N C ~' SON A"'"'ES C 0 70 d ....CX 9Â» 4 - 9- /1~/~ V V 1 9 4 -4 0 3 9 ~9 v X rs, I <.4/ 0 63 6 42 80 1:4 0 . 2 46> 0 Â©9 4 7.4-0-> tal' -M 2 4 Issue V\4;5' C:=:1 797 V t.3Â» r.b,1 0 -,=7 hA 7-7 04.08.2013 FINAL Â«32 Â«53~ 11'Â«16Ly , L.-2- COMMERCIAL DESIGN REVIEW - I/ ' =th ~Fl INg! F1 0Â»- - 0 ' 24 11 11 O Fl O Fl 3 11 1 49 4 2 CO e//1 41L Lf,71./- --Â« l' r--1 LÂ·T,-1 V 1 - I4 07 0 19 ..01 t 1 - (3.- - - %50 052129Â«]r 0 - FY - f 3--- 7 J 7 A A â€¢ Â· 5 601 EAST HYMAN -- -43 AVENUE 14 AL ~ - --43 601 EAST HYMAN AVENUE ASPEN, CO 81611 / 9 5 E 11 1 j 1 L PROJECT NO 2121300 61 1 1 11 1 SHEET TITLE 1 I FIRST LEVEL te RCP ~ PROPOSED 0 SCALE: 3/16- = 1'-0 A3.1 COFâ„¢GHT ./LUO â€¢./DN ~RCICT1~ nC ~- - - Mae:' ./.-=0TI~.APÂ¢,â‚¬rtâ‚¬CTUI~E - li8 -@fE *5** I-, IN=ExT coin,NED 01, TJU Coc. i 91Â® : ~Pelh MI 12,~MeSqL-#21/ulâ€¢5~~_-t,-r.1 rowland + broughton architecture and urban design 1 1 77 - denver, co 80205 234 e. hophniave. 3377 blake st, 106 f 970.544.9006 v 303.308.1373v 970.544.3473f 303.308.1375 f Consultar,ts: :94 0 .ALâ‚¬ON ASSO 0' 5'r f .:c . Issue 04.08.2013 FINAL ' '' " COMMERCIAL DESIGN REVIEW 6 4 r--1 r--1 r---1 r---1 F1 0 Pt 3 E U Sl Ft LIe 0 1 1 Al A k / 2 0\ - 601 EAST HYMAN r Fil 1 /9...1 - - AVENUE S' Sl ---pl - 601 EAST HYMAN AVENUE - f 11 44 'L 1 4 81 Aw.- Â· ASPEN, CO 81611 . F1 â‚¬Â»-- PROJECT NO. 21213.00 SHEET TITLE. ~ ~ PROPOSED 11 1 1 6 6 THIRD LEVEL 64 6 09 RCP SCALE: 3/16" = 1'-0" A3.3 h E- -'-0-*=&=:I:. -- ---- /*./ICE'~i 110 9 /- i*Â£51.- - - - N21,4 - i, Ficr f f 7 9 + 9 99 1 f HALO DESCRIPTION - H4 LED DOWNLIGHTTRIMS Catalog # Type Halo H4 LED family consists of 4" recessed downlights with EL4 Series LED Light Engines and TL4 andTLS4 Series LEDTrims Project F1 designed for installation in H4 LED series housings with integral LED dimmable drivers. Halo LED Downlight Trims are offered in Date Comments open and lensed baffles and reflectors; and wet location shower rated models. TL4 andTLS4 Series LEDTrims are compatible with EL4058x downlight LED light engines. Halo LED offers high quality, Prepared by fit, finish, and performance in an energy-efficient, high-efficacy downlight - ~'22-. F tim..r- SPECIFICATION FEATURES MECHANICAL FEATURES â€¢ Can be used to meet State "~ " ~ Baffles and Reflectors â€¢ Superior optical design of California Title 24 and â€¢ Precision formed aluminum provides high lumen output, International Energy 4 .It â€¢ Reflector Finishes offered in smooth beam distribution, and Conservation Code - IECC High White, Specular Clear, Haze, good visual comfort Efficacy requirements when Specular Black, Satin Nickel, â€¢ Precision design and materials used withdesignated LED Light Â·:5 Â·. "i' Â· "â€ž~..~. ,:- Â·:â€ž.-.1: and Tuscan Bronze for a high-quality fit and finish Engines* I , ..U â€¢ Baffle Finishes offered in White â€¢ Multiple trim options allow Â·I>&f.,Â·Â·Â·~.t'.~ ~ Â·'', , Â·2' -Â· ./ and Black Halo H4 LED recessed *Refer to compliance matrix downlights to be used in a wide Warranty H4 LED Trim Rings range of interior spaces â€¢ Durable die-cast aluminum â€¢ High-quality standard and Cooper Lighting provides a three Downlight â€¢ Precision keyed slots designed plated finishes Trims year limited warranty on Halo to lock with matching keyed â€¢ SoliteÂ® lensed trims offer LED Luminaires which includes bosses in H4 LED Light Engine high-clarity glass for high- the LED Recessed Housing, LED â€¢ Works with LED Light Engine's lumen transmission along Light Engine, and LED trims. TL4xx and TLS4xx heat sink to provide further with a subtle diffusion of source (Subject to all of the limitations Series thermal conduction away from brightness set forth in Cooper LightingTerms the LED â€¢ SoliteÂ® and Frost Glass Lensed and Conditions of sale. Refer to â€¢ Standard finishes offered in models are UL/cUL listed www.cooperlighting.com.) 4-Inch LEDTrims White, Black, Satin Nickel, and forWet Location, protected Tuscan Bronze. ceilings, and are IP66 Ingress â€¢ Optional, thin profile designer Protection rated for dust and trim rings offered in White, water FOR USE WITH EL458xx Black, Satin Nickel, Tuscan â€¢ Polymer shower trim features Bronze, and Polished Chrome a non-electrically conductive LED LIGHT ENGINES finishes. plastic "dead front': AND â€¢ Thin profile designer trim One piece baffle and ring, and rings provide subtle ceiling lens are formed from plastics H455, H456 SERIES 4" appearance. - special polymers to meet LED HOUSINGS. Thickness dimensions: Halo performance and quality 0.120" at OD and 0.180" at ID. standards. â€¢ H4 LED trims offer ENERGY Complete fixture STARÂ® Qualification when Compatible with H4 consists of H455 used with designated Halo H4 LED Light Engines LED Light Engines* or H456 Series LED Model Color Housing, EL4058xx Temperature Series Light Engine and 2700Â°K i,o,Nn~ TL4 Series LED trim. 11 270DK 30/K 3500K 4100' 500OK 5500Â« EL405827 2700Â°K High Efficacy LED . 3000Â°K n*ninal 41 4 1, 1 316 }41 2701}K ./K 35[10' 4ID0K SODDK 6%0OK EL405830 3000Â°K 73*E.#1 Can he tmed for 3500Â°K %* a IECC F i 44 2700K 3000K 3500K 4100' 500OK 6500K Conseratlon Code - a High Efficacy malimE -3 Comphance EL405835 3500Â°K Qualified & Compliant as designated with LED Light 4000Â°K W. 4 44 Engine andTrim. Refer to LED * 2?00K 3000K 3600K ./K 50tjUK 6500K Compliance Matrix and Light Engine Specifications. EL405840 4000Â°K COOP~R Lighting ADV110425 rev 8/4/2011 Ar.tÂ· Â·9 Canbeusedfor T24 Calilomia T,lte 24 Hi,h Efficacy Cim,liance H4 LED Downlight Trims TL4 and TLS4 Series H4 LED DOWNLIGHT SERIES -LEDTRIMS SQUARE SOLITEÂ®REGRESSED LENS BAFFLETRIMS Wet Location Listed For Shower Applications 56.:44& 1 560â€¢.446: 1-11/16- & L ,i, - 1-11/16~ 143mm] 7 X [43mm] / f Â· 1-1 1- [86 mm] 3-3/8 3-3/8 5-1/64- 5-1/64- - [129mm] - - [129mm] - TLS408WHWB TLS408WHBB Square Baffle Trim with SoliteÂ® Regressed Lens, Square BaffleTrim with SoliteÂ® Regressed Lens, â€ž WW 60 @,4%4 â€¢ â€¢ Â¥WN i.,a@g..........1 .............. Black Baffle, White Ring 1 - 1 - 1 - i 241Â·,44 $ : / ./ . 540,4..,44 ~ 1-11116 1/ \ 1 - 1-11/16- [43mm] 1 X -1 [43mm] / - -P - 1- 04 - -1-. 1- 3-3/8' [86 mm] 1 : M 5-1/64 ~ 5-1/64 - 1129mm] - ~ - [129mm]- 1 . ; TLS408SNBB TLS408TBZBB 1 Square Baffle Trim with SoliteÂ® Regressed Lens, : Square BaffleTrim with SoliteÂ® Regressed Lens, ; Black Baffle, Satin Nickel Ring ~ Black Baffle, Tuscan Bronze Ring I...........................I.................. WALL WASH TRIMS 1 1-11/16- ~ _ [43mm] e [43mm] 1-11/16- / 11 - - : 1.- 1- 3-3/8- 3-3/8 5-1/64 5-1/64- - [129mm] - - I129mm] . TL409WW TL409WHWW Wall Wash Downlight- Semi-Specular CIear Wall Wash Downlight - White Reflector with Reflector with SpecularWall Wash Optic, SpecularWall Wash Optic, Diffusing Lensand Diffusing Lens and White Ring White Ring POLYMER SHOWERTRIM su,44 1 1-11/16- / Â·/ / 2 [43mrn] / [86 mm] 3-3/8 5-1/64 - 1129mm] - TL422PS One-piece White Polymer Baffle and Ring, and Regressed Prismatic Polymer Lens. ShowerTrim front is Non-Electrically Conductive with "Dead-Front" Polymer Material. COE)~~R Lighting www.cooperlighting.com H4 LED Downlight Trirns TL4 and TLS4 Series H4 LED DOWNLIGHT SERIES - LED TRI IMS OPEN REFLECTOR AND BAFFLETRIMS 1 1 1-11/16- ~ 1-11/16" [43mm] 143mm] - * -/6. 14 . U L &14 T- 1- 3-3/8 [86 mm] 4 5-1/64 5-1/640 - [129mm] - - [129mm] - TL400SC TL400H Specular Clear Reflector, White Ring Haze Reflector, White Ring 1 1-11/16- ~ i 1-11/16 [43mm] [43mm] [86 mrn] --~ |- 1- L 3-3/8- [86 mm] 5-1/64- 5-1/64 - [129mm] - - 1129mm] .-I TL400WH TL400SBK White Reflector, White Ring Specular Black Reflector, White Ring 1-11/16- ~ 1-11/16- ~ ~43mm] < ", [43mm] S 7 4- 1- 1- [86 mm] ---1 3-3/8 3-3/8- [86 mm] 4 5-1/64 5-1/64 - 8129mm] - [129mrn] - TL400SN TL400TBZ Satin Nickel Reflector, Satin Nickel Ring Tuscan Bronze Reflector,Tuscan Bronze Ring 1-_- 1-11/16- 1-11/16 [43mm] [43mml ~_ 3-3/8 [86 mm] 1 ~ 3-3/8 [86 mm] 4 5-1/64- 5-1/64 - [129mm] - : - [129mm] - TL401 WB TL401 BB White Baffle, White Ring Black Baffle, White Ring COOPER Lighting www.cooperlighting,com H4 LED Downlight Trims TL4 and TLS4 Series H4 LEDDOWNLIGHTSERIES-LEDTRIMS REFLECTOR AND BAFFLE TRIMS WITH SOLITEÂ® REGRESSED LENS Wet Location Listed For Shower ADDIi cations - 1-11/16 '7 143 m m] 1 > -re k 3-3/8 [86 mm] 186 mrn] ---1 5-1/M 5-1/64- - 1129mm] - - 1129mm] - TL402SCS TL402HS Specular Clear Reflector with SoliteÂ® Regressed Haze Reflector with SoliteÂ® Lens, White Ring Lens, White Ring 1 54Â·,Â·,4e I 1-11/16- 1-11/16 ~. / E43mrn] / \ [43mm] 3-3/8 T-. 1- -0 1- 3-3/8 [86 mm] [86 mm] 4 5-1/64 5-1/64 - 1129mml - - [129mm] - TL402WHS TL402SBKS White Reflector with SoliteÂ® Lens, White Ring Specular Black Reflector with SoliteÂ® Lens, White Ring 1 56*449 1 1-11/16- / ~ 1-11/16 ~ ~ ~ il [43 mm] [43mrn] .1.1. - . 1 , 3-3/8" 186 mmi Â» [86 *4 1 1-1 4 3-3/8 5-1/64- 5-1/64- - 1129mm] - - 1129mm] - TL402SNS TL402TBZS Satin Nickel Reflector with SoliteÂ® Lens , Satin Tuscan Bronze Reflector with SoliteÂ® Lens, Nickel Ring Tuscan Bronze Ring 562*#~ 4 56* -4* 4 1-11/16- ) ~ 1-11/16- , ~ ~,1 [43mrn] / ~ [43mm] 186 mm] 4 [86 mm] -1 3-3/8 . 3-3/8" : 5-1/64- 5-1/64 - [129mm] - - [129mm] - TL403WBS TL403BBS White Baffle with SoliteÂ® Lens, White Ring Black Baffle with SoliteÂ® Lens, White Ring TRM400 . . Designer Trim Rings 1 â€¢ Optional accessory A - â€¢ Die-casttrim ring â€¢ Thin Profile provides subtle ceiling appearance Â¢.4. (.120" at OD and .180 at ID) taID TRM400TBZ Tuscan Bronze TRM400BK Black TRM400SN Satin Nickel TRM400PC Polished Chrome TRM400WH White COO~11 Lighting www.cooperlighting.com H4 LED Trims Lumen and Enerqv Code Summarv H4 LED Downlight Collection EL405827 EL405830 EL405835 EL405840 2700Â°K 3000Â°K 3500Â°K 4000Â°K 8 g S g g g E I â€ž S M =f .%2!Ec,02!*co =*815 Trim Type 3 Trim Model E w .53 30-Sums-guiE/=* 2 LU BEE LU 6 0 2 8 Open Specular Reflector TL400SC 603 X X 655 X X X 686 X X X 700 Open Haze Reflector TL400H 566 X X 619 X X X 653 X X X 667 X X Open White Reflector TL400WH 551 X X 606 X X X 636 X X X 653 X X Open White Baffle TL401WB 539 X X 593 X X X 623 X X X 639 X X X SoliteÂ® Lens Specular Clear Rellector TL402SCS 535 584 X X X 613 X X X 624 X X X SoliteÂ® Lens Haze Reflector TL402HS 534 575 X X X 613 X X X 615 X X X SoliteÂ® Lens White Reflector TL402WHS 539 590 X X X 630 X X X 629 X X X SoliteÂ® Lens White Baffle TL403WBS 536 584 X X X 624 X X X 625 X X X Open Specular Black Reflector TL400SBK 373 390 392 408 Open Satin Nickel Reflector TL400SN 455 475 480 496 X Open Tuscan Bronze Reflector TL400TBZ 414 434 434 451 Open Black Baffle TL401BB 368 383 388 403 SoliteÂ® Lens Specular Black Reflector TL402SBKS 497 515 X 521 X 531 X SomeÂ® Lens Satin Nickel Reflector TL402SNS 508 527 X 533 X 544 X SoliteÂ® Lens Tuscan Bronze Reflector TL402TBZS 484 505 X 504 X 519 X SoliteÂ® Lens Black Baffle TL403BBS 495 515 X 520 X 531 X Square Baffle Trim, SomeÂ® Lens, White Ring and White Baffle TLS408WHWB 531 568 X X 596 X X 625 X X Square Baffle Trim, SoliteÂ® Lens, White Ring and Black Baffle TLS408WHBB 502 535 554 591 Square Baffle Trim, SoliteÂ® Lens, Satin Nickel Ring and Black Baffle TLS408SNBB 502 535 554 591 Square Baffle Trim, SoliteÂ® Lens, Tuscan Bronze Ring and Black Baffle TLS408TBZBB 502 535 554 591 Wall Wash, Semi-Specular Reflector, and White Ring TL409\MA/ 538 572 X X 604 X X 633 X X Wall Wash, White Reflector, and White Ring TL409WHWW 530 564 X X 596 X X 624 X X Polymer Lensed Shower Trim, White Baffle and Ring TL422PS 568 605 x x 638 x x 669 X X (1) Downlight trims are tested with designated LED Light Engines in accordance with IES Photometric Measurement Standards 20 0,0 (2) Halo is committed to providing the latest in qualification testing to ENERGY STARÂ® standards. As an ENERGY STARÂ® Partner, Cooper Lighting adhers to the stringent standards of ENERGY STARÂ® and maintains the & 1 highest level of compliance qualification. (3) California Title 24, registered with State of California Appliance Database under High Efficacy LED. (4) International Energy Conservation Code (Z) HV.LS *933~13 x (0 421 eiwomeo x M 0031 xxx H4 o nlightTrims TLS4 Series H4 LED Downlight Trims TL4 and TLS4 Series PHOTOMETRY- [Waii-Wasb.-semi-specuiarciear Ill)lilliN4 122:0!3110;EQ,!121 1~5%Wi--951~1 itilii~ Reflector, Specular Wall Wash Optic Candela I I ~ ~ . It-_ 3' --il I [Average-22%ER---1[.222-~ Imi_____â€¢=a_==m_~ TL409WW Degrees ~ 1 0 ~ 278 ~ |0[* 1' 15.6 15.8 15.6 1 [,i I 1' 13.8 9.0 13.8 | 1 Luminance 3' 12.6 13.6 12.6 | Lumens per Watt = 42.02 LpW 155-32442 1 Test No. P21178 113%21Â®+p*=1 2419 199-5-' 2828 - 55 3 151 6' 3.3 3.6 3.3 1 65 1 64 1 ~7252525 7' 2.3 2.4 2.3 -~E---KIN-T---1-71900 12Â«IfEE] 12-7-37-G-37-1 8' 1.6 1.7 1.6 9' 12 1.3 1.2 I \ \11~64 pfloo \\2 79 Zone Lumens % Lam % Fixture Color Temperature astested: 3000Â°K 0-30 217 N/A 61.1 Color Tem erature 2700Â°K 3000Â°K 3500Â°K 4000Â°K 1 \ 92Â»00 0-40 347 N/A 84.7 Multiplier 0.9397 1.0000 1.0553 1.1055 ~ 36Â«>~300 0-60 534 N/A 98.3 Representative photometric test reports are as illustrated in combination 0Â° 10Â° 0-90 576 N/A 100 with Halo H4 LED Light Engines in 3000Â°K colortemperature. For relative lumen values with other colortemperatures options in Halo LED usethe appropriate multiplier - Regressed Lens - TLS408WHWB | CAverage Candela/M') 11 Degrees Candela Distance to Initial Nadir Beam L~ | Degrees | Avg, 00 | V Eal _TE--1 1 Illuminated I Foot 1 1 Plane I Spacing Criteria = 0.62 5.8 _ 1 Lumens per Watt = 41.4 LpW I 15 I 650 1-70--2174 ~ Test No. P21157 1-65-2841 25 ~ 353 ~ ~8 0" ~ 16 ~~|8.4 ~ 35 ~ 136 ~ | 9-0" ~ 12 9.5__ d 45 ~ 34 ~ ~6 0" --1--------10--1---16.6 55112 1 1617 1 17514 1 851 L_El_L_-1 504 n |\ 1 1/1 /600 p/,3.9/,4/311/915*VER,/*/1,906/91~ EirEFEK/5W1/FJmEFEET/m/lize/mmw/&/il#Ripglia/2 Color Temperature as tested: 3000Â°K 755 ~Â·--~ ~ ~40Â° -0-60-856-N/A-97.8--~ Representative photometric test reports are as illustrated in combination -0 96 -568 -N/A 100 | with Halo H4 LED Light Engines in 3000Â°K colortemperature. Forrelative lumen values with other colortemperatures options in Halo 20Â° LED use the appropriate multiplier. 0Â° 10Â° (Average Cande'a/M') - 1 EE FT--Undeia 1 Distance to | Initial Nadir Beam 1 i , 11 Illuminated 1 Foot Candles I Diameter (ft) 1 Degrees Avg. Ov 1 Luminance I ~_ 0 ~ 349 ~ Plane Lumens per Watt = 48.54 LpW 45:19879--1 n_L-_.~_-21__~ EIEZEJUELIEI{Â©23 ~ Test No. P20074 1 1--65-1-16T---1 1--:L4----11-1 L_IL_1__-6 -ild--1 35 1 363 1 E-VOI=-r---4p-16.9 5|5516 1 | 75- 7- 2 1~1 . 1 7 L_El_0- 1 \ V\\ 1 1 140 Tr,~ v 60. B,/,air--%:S,i,~,Y~Lenl~-a#,~-~-~-F:7 iiEE*E~ 1 Zone Lumens % Lamp ~ % Fixture -1 Color Temperature astested: 3500Â°K 0-30346-NFA-50.5 FColor Temperature2700'K-Â§*ER-T--3550'KT**'K MultipherE@@EE@*ELI@Â£13.0476 ~ ~ ~ 1 45* i 0-60 i 679 i N/A i 99.0 1 Representative photometric test reports are as illustrated for downlighting include open and lensed trims in combination with Halo H4 LED Light Engines in 3500Â°K colortemperature. 420-- 1 1 For relative lumen values with other colortemperatures options in Halo LED usethe appropriate multiplier. 0Â° 15 30 Tested in accordance with IES LM-79 Photometric Measurement Standards. Tests represent relative SSL fixture performance. Field results may vary. H4 LED Downlight Trims TL4 and TLS4 Series PHOTOMETRY White Baffle, Solite Lens lix[~ (%139,&6#Ic/6~.1/~ ~2~11(IdliD,Rm#]32* -fiEIGhdkfit&** 42:qr. I, -f LE-i ~1ff-zitk&>i 9 ~;, TL403WBS (Average Candela/MI Degrees Candela Distance to Initial Nadir Beam Vertical Illuminated Foot Candles Diameter (ft) Degrees Avg. 0Â° 0 753 Plane Spacing Criteria = 0.6 Luminance 5 698 5' 6~ 25 7.1 Lumens per Watt = 44,27 LpW 45 18309 15 464 7' 0" 15 9.0 55 5589 Test No. P20081 25 317 8'0" 12 10.3 65 5543 Test Model: EL405835 (3500K LED module) 75 4288 35 234 9' 0" 9 11.6 45 105 10' 0" 8 12.9 85 2829 - i ILLIM[ti'~ft-iND-Eb-1*~0.22 =~ 55 26 90 65 19 75 9 85 2 75 90 0 300 15&[al ,323113&# au:*6**t#F.*i*uy-1-*2. 2;Plf.ll?flf.N ~.:%427;%*Â£2Â¢!!*,MIC*-1<~f~kma*M& Zone Lumens % Lamp % Fixture Color Temperature as tested: 3500Â°K 0-30 341 N/A 54.6 Color Temperature 2700Â°K 3000Â°K 3500Â°K 4000Â°K 45 Multiplier 0-40 487 NA 78.0 0.8905 0.9476 1.0000 1.0476 0-60 594 N/A 95.1 Representative photometric test reports are as illustrated for downlighting 0-90 624 N/A 100 include open and lensed trims in combination with Halo H4 LED Light Engines 900 in 3500Â°K colortemperature. 0' 15' 30' For relative lumen values with other colortemperatures options in Halo LED usethe appropriate multiplier. White Baffle, Open ~ '1}.t'-0,rl~~k20.Wiki: 1-â‚¬oY-2.-Ul!Flt2~.d7'AI 12Â·--fri--r-i~?-4fYEz~@@E TL401WB (Average Candela/Mz) Degrees Candela Distance to Initial Nadir Beam Vertical Illuminated Foot Candles Diameter (ft) Degrees Avg. 0Â° 0 332 Plane Spacing Criteria = 1.3 Luminance 5 322 5'6" 11 10.1 Lumens per Watt = 44.17 LpW 45 15868 15 308 7'0" 7 12.9 55 10318 Test No. P20077 25 293 8' 0" 5 14.8 65 11087 Test Model: EL405835 (3500K LED module) 75 9528 35 276 9' 0" 4 16.6 85 7074 45 91 10' 0" 3 18,4 tw~<-~~1Ll.MIZZtEIGIETi-1-EDÂ£%Â¢72 : =- 55 48 ~ 90- 65 38 75 20 85 5 90 0 120 44 A Y i 11 160 ;~201[?fiIE*22%~:li~jik~;;:al*%*iti*~?~i #SAk Zone Lumens % Lamp % Fixture Color Temperature as tested: 3500Â°K 240 ----r 0-30 254 N/A 40.7 Color Temperature 2700Â°K 3000Â°K 3500Â°K 4000Â°K 0-40 427 N/A 68.5 Multiplier 0.8905 0.9476 1.0000 1.0476 0-60 558 N/A 89.7 Representative photometr c test reports are as illustrated for downlighting 0-90 623 N/A 100 include open and lensed trims in combination with Halo H4 LED Light Engines 360 - in 3500Â°K colortemperature. For relative lumen values with other colortemperatures options in Halo 0' 15 30' LED usethe appropriate multiplier. Specular Clear, Solite Lens il*mmfl:t m~ i&]aCcttla~, <1*~MbfIEMQ .4:, 2.-~6~~,*ifiCC2@~&22:1~ TL402SCS (Average Candela/M') Degrees Candela Distance to Inmal Nadir Beam Vertical Illuminated Foot Candles Diameter (ft) Degrees Avg. 0Â° 0 751 Plane Spacing Criteria = 0.7 Luminance 5 702 5' 6" 25 7.1 Lumens per Watt = 43.53 LpW 45 15694 15 516 7' 0" 15 9.0 55 2795 Test No. P20078 25 358 8' 0" 12 10.3 65 2042 Test Model: EL405835 (3500K LED module) 35 231 9' 0" 9 11.6 75 953 85 1415 45 90 10' 0" 8 12.9 55 13 90 65 7 75 2 85 1 75 90 0 300 60- 600 4*tftil 012*.diI:imilÂ·,k,;3S%%-930*2:if**.*2164 -9'1:briltilt#i:'22 4#,+~cLa:ki.*ateRE,:220*~M.*il?Â· Zone Lumens % Lamp % Fixture Color Temperature as tested: 3500Â°K 0-30 375 N/A 61.1 Color Temperature 2700Â°K 3000Â°K 3500Â°K 4000Â°K 45- 0-40 519 N/A 84.7 Multiplier 0.8905 0.9476 1.0000 1.0476 0-60 603 N/A 98.3 Representative photometric test reports are as illustrated for downlighting 0-90 613 N/A 100 include open and lensed Ems in combination with Halo H4 LED Light Engines 900 in 3500Â°K colortemperature. 15 30* For relative lumen values with other colortemperatures options in Halo LED use the appropriate multiplier Tested in accordance with IES LM-79 Photometric Measurement Standards. Tests represent relative SSL fixture performance, Field results may vary. H4 LED Downlight Trims TL4 and TLS4 Series ORDERING INFORMATION SAMPLE NUMBER: ELSG405840TBZ Complete unit includes H4 LED housing, light engine, and trim, ordered separately Housing: Referto housing specification sheets for selection and details, Light Engine: H4 LED Downlight Light Engines EL4058x Seriesare compatible with thiscomplete collection of H4 LED Downlight Trims, (Note H4 LED Adjustable Gimbalsare available. The H4 Roundand Square Gimbals featureacombinedtrim andlightengine, and are not compatible with H4 LED downlighttrims. Referto Adjustable Gimbal Light Engine specification sheets fordetails.) H4 LED Downlight Trims TLS408WHWB=Square Baffle Trim, SoliteÂ® Lens, White Ring with White Baffle ~ Accessories TLS408WHBB=Square Baffle Trim, SoliteÂ® Lens, White Ring with Black Baffle Designer Trim Rings, Thin Profile TLS408SNBB=Square Baffle Trim, SomeÂ® Lens, Satin Nickel Ring with Black Baffle (Compatible with all round H4 LED TL4x trims; TLS408TBZBB=Square Baffle Trim, SoliteÂ® Lens, Tuscan Bronze Ring with Black Baffle not compatible with TLS4x square trims) TL409WW=Wall Wash, Semi-Specular Clear Reflector with White Ring TRM400WH=White, die-cast trim ring TRM400BK=Black, die-cast trim ring TL409WHWW=Wall Wash, White Reflector with White Ring TRM400SN=Satin Nickel, die-cast trim ring TL422PS=Polymer Baffle & Regressed Lens Shower Trim, White Baffle & Ring TRM400TBZ=Tuscan Bronze, die-cast trim ring TL400SC=Specular Clear Reflector, White Ring TRM400PC=Polished Chrome, die-cast trim ring TL40OH=Haze Reflector, White Ring TL400WH=White Reflector, White Ring TL400SN=Satin Nickel Renector, Satin Nickel Ring TL400TBZ=Tuscan Bronze Reflector, Tuscan Bronze Ring TL400SBK=Specular Black Reflector, White Ring TL401WB=White Baffle, White Ring TL401BB=Black Baffle, White Ring TL402SCS=Specular Clear Reflector, SoliteÂ® Lens , White Ring TL402HS=Haze Renector, SoliteÂ® Lens, White Ring TL402WHS=White Reflector, SoliteÂ® Lens, White Ring 11402SNS=Satin Nickel Reflector, SoliteÂ® Lens, Satin Nickel Ring TL402TBZS=Tuscan Bronze Reflector, SoliteÂ® Lens, Tuscan Bronze Ring TL402SBKS=Specular Black Reflector, SoliteÂ® Lens, White Ring TL403WBS=White Baffle, SoliteÂ® Lens, White Ring TL403BBS=Black Baffle, SoliteÂ® Lens, White Ring SoliteÂ® is a registered trademark of AGC Flat Glass North America Note: Specifications and Dimensions subject to change without notice. Visit our web site at www.cooperlighting.com COO~R Lighting Customer First Center 1121 Highway 74 South Peachtree City, GA 30269 770.486.4800 FAX 770 486.4801 www.cooperlight ng.com Cooper Lighting 5925 McLaughlin Rd. Mississauga, Ontario, Canada L5R 188 905.507.4000 FAX 905.568.7049 HALO- DESCRIPTION - Type Catalog # The H995ICAT is a dedicated LED small aperture IC AIR-TITEâ„¢ housing for use with Halo RL4 Series LED modules. It is designed project F1 for use in insulated ceilings where it will be in direct contact with insulation*. It is an AIR-TITETM housing designed to prevent air Comments Date flow between occupied spaces and unconditioned areas. Prepared by DESIGN FEATURES Housings - Accommodates the following Labels â€¢ Double wall aluminum standard non-metallic sheathed â€¢ UL/cUL Listed 1598 Luminaire .. construction helps dissipate heat. cable sizes: . UUcUL Listed for Damp Location , The inner housing can be adjusted (US) #14/2, #14/3, #12/2, #12/3 â€¢ UL/cUL Listed for Wet Location, . 3 in the plaster frame to compensate (Canada) #14/2, #14/3, #12/2 with select trims for different ceiling materials. â€¢ UL/cUL listed for Feed Through "Quick Connect" Connectors â€¢ Designed for insulated ceilings in direct contact with insulation . Three quick connect wiring â€¢ UL/cUL listed for Direct Contact with insulation and combustible (May also be installed in connectors included. material* non-insulated ceilings.) GOT NAIL! Pass -N-Thruâ„¢ Compliance Plaster Frarne Bar Hangers â€¢ Use with designated LED light H9951CAT â€¢ Galvanized steel die-formed â€¢ Pre-installed nail easily installs engines and trims for ENERGY construction. in regular lumber, engineered STARÂ® qualification. â€¢ The inner housing can be removed lumber and laminated beams. â€¢ Can be used for State of California from plaster frame to provide â€¢ Safety and guidance system 4-Inch New Construction access to the junction box. prevents snagging, ensures Title 24 high efficacy compliance â€¢ Plaster frame features include: smooth straight nail penetration with designated LED light engines Insulated Ceiling AIR-TITEâ„¢ Recessed Housing and allows bar hangers to be easily and trims. - Patented regressed locking removed if necessary. â€¢ Can be used for International For Halo LED Module screw positioned for securing hanger bars from below the â€¢ Automatic levelling flange aligns Energy Conservation Code CIECC) RL4 Series ceiling. the housing and lets you hold the high efficacy compliance with - Cutouts for easily crimping hanger housing in place with one hand designated LED light engines High Efficacy LED Housing while driving nails. and trims. bars in position. â€¢ Housing can be positioned at any â€¢ Refer to H4 LED Light Engine and - AIR-TITE aperture gasket is pre-installed. point within 24" joist span, Trim specification sheets online - HALO identity embossed on â€¢ Pass-N-ThruTM feature allows bar for compliance information. FOR USE IN plaster frame hangers to be shortened without Qualification INSULATED CEILINGS removing from plaster frame. IC and AIR-TITETM Slide-N-Sideâ„¢ Junction Box â€¢ Score lines allow "tool-less" Certified under ASTM-E283 and FOR DIRECT CONTACT â€¢ Positioned to accommodate shortening for 12" joists. listed UL/cUL 1598. May be used WITH INSULATION* straight conduit runs â€¢ Integral T-bar clip snaps onto to meet insulated ceiling* and â€¢ Seven 1/2" trade size conduit T-bars - no additional clips restricted air-flow requirements ALSO SUITABLE FOR knockouts with true pry-out slots required such as: NON-IC CEILINGS â€¢ Slide-N-Side wire traps allow â€¢ Washington State Energy Code non-metallic sheathed cable to be LED Module Connection installed without tools and without Halo LED RL4 Series modules simply â€¢ International Energy Conservation removing knockouts. install with a plug-in 120V line volt- Code (IECC) age wiring connector (UL and CSA â€¢ New York State Energy â€¢ Accepts a wide range of non- Listed Luminaire Disconnect). This Conservation Construction Code metallic (type NM) sheathed non-screw-base LED connection (NY-ECCC) cables - the standard cable types preserves the high efficacy rating of â€¢ State of California Title 24 used in lighting in both U.S. and the luminaire (see also LED Module "Recessed Luminaires in Insulated Canada. specifications). Ceilings." - Allows wiring connections to be Warranty made outside the junction box Cooper Lighting provides a five year - Simply insert the cable directly into limited warranty on Halo RL4 LED * Not to be used in direct contact the trap after connections are Luminaires which includes the LED with spray foam insulation. air*ca- made. Recessed Housing, and LED module. DIMENSIONS 1 Canbeus./. 1 Canbeused# ENERGY IECC STAR Â® 1 Intematlonal Enegy r 0 1-.-1 '30 -1~04..8 1 HIgh eficac, Compllar~. | C...edfor WSEC 5-1/2 inch (140 mm) 8-1/2 inch - Con,pl~nce H#h Emil (216 mm) Qualified and compliant with 1.0.-Ll 1 0 04 select LED modules. Refer 1/2 inch to ENERGY STARÂ® Qualified Tr77-77 /// /~7% (13 mm) Products List and CEO (T-24) 2 4-3/8 jnch ~ 99 (111 mm) ~4 ~41 - ~~ ~:0 ~ Ceiling opening Appliance Database for listings. COOPER Lighting J_ 5-1/4 inch _~ - (133 mm) ADV120463 www.cooperlighting.com December 18, 2012 4:36 PM HALOÂ® H995ICAT ORDERING INFORMATION SAMPLE NUMBER: H995ICAT - RL406830WH Complete unit includes Halo H995 series housing and RL4 LED. Housing and RL4 LED to be ordered separately. Housing 1 1 1 H995= 4" LED Housing with ~ ICAT= 4" Dedicated LED Insulated Ceiling, AIR-TITE New Construction Housing dedicated LED luminaire connector (high efficacy compliant) RL4 LED Module* 1 RL406= 4" LED Retrofit Module, 18= 80 CRI 1 30= 3000Â°K ~ WH= White Baffle and Trim Ring Dimmable, 120V SN= Satin Nickel Baffle and Trim Ring *Refer to LED module specication sheet for additional information. Coo~R Lighting Note: Specifications and Dimensions subjectto change without notice. Visit our web site at www.cooperlighting.com www.cooperlighting.com Customer First Center 1121 Highway 74 South Peachtree City, GA 30269 770.486.4800 FAX 770 486.4801 Cooper Lighting 5925 McLaughlin Rd. Mississauga, Ontario, Canada L5R 1B8 905.507.4000 FAX 905.568.7049 Manufacturer: LIGMAN Specified Catalog #: U40581-10W-1 -w V -06 S1 LUMINAIRE:SPECIFICA:TION 1- 4 -2 3 h. 2 - 1 -1. r ;TE; â‚¬h:I- CLVÂ· R I It PagE L iM#&0 4 '7 VA';1 LOC:Lit â‚¬#f~ 1 U40581 Rado 5 reces:s:ed Joi At:on ir)111 [ ED 4.Odut:tly,* A rel'Â·40 -1*â€¢.â€¢010Â·.Ivq- 1 1,.1 re : ,. 1-Â·Â·Â·-1Â·91 :irni Â· 1 ". , 1 'tÂ· =n â‚¬'.Â·Â· ..1.,ht Â· 11Â· Â·1 -â€¢. It. 1 i Â·.1 1.-Â·.L B.Â·L..hel:..1 f .UÂ·1'1:,il~~'. ..W| f, Fi Â·. I CLD-U 0.-1- 2. 1 -; d i.: 1Â·.211=67<|i f .%(Â·. r'7Â·Â·ft.â€ž r.nier:+ -Â·f ''i.- ?' fÂ·' E- ' * ~â€¢: i' â€¢1 7 - 1 3 h.0- 'V.2.r-4, r.4 161'r 4 1 .1-1 1,1.ftÂ·Â·.'1.'"IiÂ·' 1/Â·L. it .Â·Â·'1'Â·1: Â·Â·.1.AÂ· I liâ€žÂ·,Â·Â·:1 :lE 1 1. Â·Â·~ / 2..:' 1 Â·Â·1 -- 1 tÂ· ; Â· *} T,m .1 9@ ; 30.v iÂ·' ''j: 1 2:,1 t â€¢/ A# 33 :t ... . , 9~~ i â‚¬931' 5 . ..< â‚¬fÂ¢ta:{4< 41Â·i UpyÂ¢4Â§it i 49 lâ‚¬F*:9 1 .,1Â¥ j?ff. P'6â‚¬ ~ ~. 11?:3*:?SO.vv :>plâ‚¬t.'.: IM. IV C 1 . C . '1: f Â· 4 1, .â€¢ '.Â¢Wl Â· 1 . 7-.1 0 0Â· 1 4 4; 11.4 f. C â€¢â€¢7 "' Â·yiit f tz,r,%9/il/" ~y j< EL 1 -4 e I .Â»a f ,â€ž F./.1 ./46/. '#. U .:. :;- P t. }***4~ LAA 1.10%4*e *Â»t,Â¥05:UNÂ»29*23Â«4 UF* 4%,f 41' EN#*34*2 *Â¢**03#* sl,Â¥094 Â§08~Ni~Bt *0", ~9.04 ' THE GANT RENOVATION Issue VE PROGRESS REVISION Date 22-Feb-13 HE GANT RENOVATION, ASPEN COLORAD<Project # DV12122 10055 W. 43rd Ave. Wheat Ridge, CO 80033 PH:(303)421.6655 Type: L3 1,/ I. www.me-engineers.com - 4 . i RESOLUTION NO. 22 (SERIES OF 2012) A RESOLUTION OF THE ASPEN PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION APPROVING GROWTH MANAGEMENT AND SUBDIVIS]ON REVIEWS FOR NEW COMMERICAL ANI) FREE-MARKET RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT THAT IS PART O} A MIXED-USE DEVELOPMENT KNOWN AS VICTORIAN SQUARE CONDOMINtUMS AND LOCATED AT 601 E. HYMAN AVENUE, CITY OF ASPEN, PITKIN COUNTY. COLORADO. Parcel 0,9 2737-182-25-801,2737-182-25-027, 2737-182-25-028, 2737-182-25-029, 2737-182-25-430,2737-182-25-031, 2737-182-25-032,2737-182-25-033. WHEREAS, the Community Development Department received an application from Victorian Square, LI.C requesting Growth Management and Subdivision Reviews approval to develop new commercial net leasable area and a new free-market residential unit as part ofanew mixed-use developmentlocated at 601 E. Hyman Avenue: and. WHEREAS, prior to applying for the Subdivision review and Growth Management review :br new commercial and residential development the Applicant received Conceptual Commercial Design Review approval from the Planning and Zoning Commission via Resolution No. 19. Series of 2012: and. WHEREAS, the Growth Management review is for approval of both the commercial and residential components of a Mixed-Use Building which contains 7,265 sq. R. of net leasable area. of which 2.056 sq. ft. of net leasable area is newly created andi,835 sfof residential that is entirely newly created; and WHEREAS, upon review of the application and the applicable code standards, the Community Development Department recommended approvai of the Growth Management Review t'CC]ltests: and. WHEREAS, upon review of the application and the applicable code standards, the Community Development Department recommended approval of the Subdivision Review request: and, WHEREAS. the Planning and Zoning Commission reviewed and considered the development proposal wider the applicable provisions of the Municipal Code as idenlified herein. has reviewed and Considered the recommendation of the Community Developmeni Director, and has taken and considered public comment at a duly noticed public hearing on December#, 20]2; and, WHEREAS, the Planning. and Zoning Commission grants approval of the Growth Management Review request fur the commercial component of a mixed development thal cumMins 7.265 sq. ft. of net le:sable area. and. 1 t,Ja.nice A: VOS LIa.Uâ‚¬1111, 2'1 i.Klil LOUULT, Lv WHEREAS, the Planning and Zoning Commission grants approval of ilie Growth Management Review request for the free-market residential unit within a mixed- use development that contains 1.835 sq. ft. of net livable area: and, WIÂ·IEREAS, the City of Aspen Planning and Zoning Commission recommends approval ofthe Subdir'isioii review request. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY OF ASPEN PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION AS FOLLOWS: This approval shall be contingent on a recommendation from the APCHA Board that housing mitigation shall occur via a Certificate of Affordable Housing Credits. Section 1: Pursiian{ to the procedures and standard:s set forth in Title 26 of the Aspen Municipal Code. the Planning and Zoning Commission hereby approves Growth Management Reviews for the following items, in accordance with the plans attached as Exhibit A and incorporated by this reference: â€¢ New Net Lessable Space: Pursuant 10 Section 26.470.080.1 of the Land Use Code, the Planning and Zoning Commission grants approval for 2,056 growth nianagement allounents related to 2.056 sf of new net leasable space within the proposed development, â€¢ Addition of Multi-Family Free-Market Space: Pursuant to Section 26.470.080.2 of the Land Use Code. the Planning and Zoning Commission grants approval for one growth management allotment related to the addition of one multi-family free-market residential unit within the proposed development. â€¢ Affordable Housing: Pursuant to Section 26.470.040.C,7 of the Land Use Code, the Planning and Zoning Commission grants the Applicant approval to meet the requirement of affordable housing mitigation through purchasing a Certificate of Affordable Housing Credits for the required 4.79 FTE's, to be deed-restricted at a Category 4 or lower. â€¢ The Certificate of A ffordable Housing Credits shall be extinguished by the City prior to issuance of building permit. Section 2: Pursuant to the procedures and standards set forth in Title 26 of the Aspen Municipal Code. the Planning and Zoning Commission hereby recommends approval of Subdivision review to City Council regarding the addition of a multi-family free-market residential unit having separate legal interests. b-3 Janice A. VOS La.Ualil, 1-1 44.141 1-gult Ly, uu Section 3: Building The Applicant shall meet adopted building codes and requirements if and when a building permit is submitted. All dimensional standards shall be met for the C-1 zone district and confirmed at the time of building permit. Section 4: Engineering The Applicant's design shall be compliant with all sections of the City of Aspen Municipal Code, Title 21 and all construction and excavation standards published by the Engineering Department. The project must comply with CMP requirements at the time of permit. The design for the site must meet the requirements of the Urban Runoff Management Plan. A drainage plan must be submitted prior to building permit issuance. Section 5: Fire Mitigation All codes adopted by the Aspen Fire Protection District shall be met. This includes bul is not limited to access (International Fire Code (11:C), 2009 Edition. Section 503), approved fire sprinkler and fire alarm systems (1FC, as amended. Section 903 and 9071 Section 6: Public Works The Applicalit shall comply with the City of Aspen Water System Standards. with Title 25. and with the applicable standards of Title 8 (Water Conservation and Plumbing Advisory Code) of the Aspen Municipal Code, as required by the City of Aspen Water Department. Utility placement and design shall meet adopted City of Aspen standards. Each of the units within the building shall have individual water meters. Section 7: Sanitation District Requirements: Service is contingent upon compliance with the District's rules. regulations. and specifications, which are on file at the District office. Oil and Grease interceptors (not traps) are required for all food processing establishments and shall be identified and specified prior to building permit. Old service lines must be excavated and properly abandoned. Section 8. Environmental Health The state of Colorado mandates specific mitigation requirements with regard to asbestos. Additionally. code requirements to be aware of when filing a building permit include: a prohibition on engine idling, regulation of fireplaces. fugitive dust requirements, noise abatement and pool designs. Section 9: Exterior Lighting: All exterior lighting shall meet the requirements of ihe City'% Outdoor Lighting Code pursuant to 1.and Use Code Section 26.575.150. Outdoor lighting. Section 10: Off-Street Parking The Applicant is required to provide parking mitigation for the increase iii net-leasable commercial space on site. The new net leasable square footage will generate 2.056 parking spaces. The Applicant will provide cash-in-lieu payment as mitigation for the parking spaces. as per Section 26.515.030. Required number offlfistreet parki,W spaces, W of the Land Use Code, This same section of the Code states thal the Applicant is not required to provide parking for the residential free-market unit as the development is within the C-1 (Commercial) zone district. Section 11: Impact Fees Before the Applicant is issued a Building Permit. the Applicant shall pay a Parks Development fee and a TDM/Air Quality fee pursuant to Chapter 26.610. hnpuct Fees. The amount of the fees shall be calculated by the Community Development Department using the calculation method and fee schedule in effect at the time the Applicant submits a building permit. Section 12: School Land Dedication Fees Prior to the issuance of building permit, the Applicant shall pay a School Land Dedications fee pursuant to Chapter 26.620, School Land Dediearion. The amount of the fees shall be calculated by the Community Development Department using the calculation niethod and fee schedule in eliect at the time the Applicant submits a building penn it Section 13: All material representations and commitinents made by tlie Applicant pursuant to the development proposal approvals as herein awarded., whether in public hearing or documentation presented before the Planning and Zoning Commission or City Council. are hereby incorporated in such plan development approvals and the same shall be coinplicd with as iffully set forth herein. unless amended by an authorized entity. Section 14: 1-his Resolution shalt not affect any existing litigation and shall not operate as an abatement of any action or proceeding now pending under or by virtue of the ordinances repealed or amended fts herein provided, erict the same shall be conducted and concluded under such prior ordinances. Section 15: If any section, subsection, sentence, clause, phrase, or portion of this Resolution is for any reaso:n held invalid or unconstitutional in a court of competent jurisdiction. such portion shall be deemed a separate, distinct and independent provision and shall not affect the validity ofthe remaining portions thereof. APPROVED BY the Planning and Zoning Commission of the Cityof Aspen on this 40~ day of December. 2012. 110 Â¢ I)4Â·spamer j lt!9(ning and Zoning Commission Chair 4 APPROVED ASTO FORM: h 10\ 1, I rh U - ..JU Up - Deb Quinn, Assistant City Attorney ATTES'I': ,#-fÂ©,65(~k1kr44;T5 Jackie Lothian, Deputy City Clerk Exhibit A: Floor plans 5 Attachment 9 RESOLUTION NO. 19 (SERIES OF 2012) A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF ASPEN PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION APPROVING A CONCEPTUAL COMMERCIAL DESIGN FOR VICTORIAN SQUARE CONDOMINIUMS, COMMONLY DESCRIBED AS 601 E. HYMAN AVE, CITY OF ASPEN, P]TKIN COUNTY, COLORADO Parcel ID: 2737482-250-31, 2737-182-250-28.2737-182-250-30, 2737-182-258-01, 2737-182-250-27,2737-182250-32,2737-482-250-33,2737-182-250-29 WHEREAS, the Community Development Department received an application from the Victorian Square, LLC (Applicant). represented by Stan Clauson of Stan Clauson Associates, Inc., requesting the Planning and Zoning Commission recommend approval of a Conceptual Commercial Design for Mixed Use development at Victorian Square: and, WHEREAS, pursuant 10 Chapter 26.412 of the Land Use Code. commercial d:e:sign review approval may be granted by the Planning and Zoning Commission at a duly noticed public hearing: and, WHEREAS, during a regular meeting on June 19. 2012. and a continued public hearing on July 3rd. 2012, the Plonning and Zoning Commission opened a duly noticed public hearing to consider the project and recommended approval of the conceptual commercial design with conditions: and. WTIEREAS, upon call-up review o f the project by City Council. during a regular public hearing on August 27.20]2. City Council chose to remand the project back to tile Planning and Zoning Commission with direction to re-examine the amount of public amenity space found on- site; WHEREAS, at tlieir regular meeting on October 16, 2012, during a duly noticed public hearing, the Commission considered City Council s request to re-examine and niemorialize the amount of public amenity space found on the subject parcel. and found that the development review standards for Conceptual Commercial Design Review have been met. as long as certain conditions are implemented, by a vote of three to one (3-1): NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED thal the Planning and Zoning Commission approve the Conceptual Commercial Design Review. pursuant to the procedures and standards set forth in Title 26 of the Aspen Municipal Code. for the Victorian Square building, subject to the conditions listed in Section 1 below. Section 1: The approval is subject to the following conditions: 1. The Final Commercia] Design Reviewapp:licationshall rellectand demonstrate compliance with the findings of the Commission. e* r" 1 A .1 2. 1 ne rinal commeicial Dest#fl Reviews:pplication shal; incluue: Page 1 of 4 a. An application for Final Commercial Design Review and the proposed development is further subject to Final Commercial Design Review, GMQS Allotment. and Subdivision. A pre-application confbrence with a member of the Community Development Ilepartment is required prior to submitting an application. b. Delineation of all dimensional provisions of the development. c. Aproposed subdivision plat. 3, Approval of the Conceptual Commercial Desigll does not preclude meeting other requirements of the Municipal Code. suchas Engineering and Parks standards. Drawings illustrating the Conceptual Commercial Design Review are attached as exhibits to this Resolution. Section 2: Public AmenitÂ¥ Space The approved public curnity space shall comprise a total of no less than 562,50 sf (12.5%) of the total parcel. with the cantitevered upper floors on the Hyman Ave fal;ade extending to no more than 3' beyond the first floor ofthe building. The public amenity will be in the form of an enhanced public walkway thal will wrap around Hyman Ave, to Hunter St, This space will include the addition ofstreet trees and other landscaping, as well as bench seating. Section 3: Building ' The final design shall mee:t adopted buikling codes and requirements if and when a building permit is submitted. Section 4: Engineering The Applicant's design shall be compliant with all sections of the City of Aspen Municipal Code, Title 21, Title 28 and all construction and excavation stan:dards published by the Engineering Department A construction management plan must be submitted in conjunction with the building permit application. A completed drainage report/plan as outlined in the Urban Runoff Management Plan shall be submitted and approved prior to Building Permit issuance. This major project is subject to the fcc in lieu re:quirentent of Section 2.12.140 of the Aspen Municipal Code. Section 5: Parks Landscaping in the public right-of-way will be subject to landscaping in the right-of-way requirement. Chapter 21.20, of the Municipal Code. There shall be no planlings within the City right-of-way which are riot approved by the City Parks and Engineering departments. Per Municipal Code 13.20. art approved tree permit will be required prior to any tree removal or development within the drip tine of thetree, Ali tree permits musi be approved prior to approval of building permits. Parks uill approve the final landscape plan during the review of the tree removal pennit based on landscape estimates. Section 6: Fire Mitigation All codes adopted by the Aspen Fire Protection District shall be met. This includes but is not - limited to access (International Fire Code OFC), 2003 Edition, Section 503), approved fire sprinkler and fire alarm systems (IFC, as amended, Section 903 and 907). Page 2 061 4 , -- Section 7: Public Works The Applicant shall comply with the City of Aspen Water System Standards. with 'ritle 25, and with the applicable standards of Title 8 (Water Conservation and Plumbing Advisory Code) of the Aspen Municipal Code. as required by the City of Aspen Water Department. Utility placement and design shall meel adopted City of Aspen standards. Section 8: Sanitation District Requirements Service is conlingent upon compliance with the District's rules, regulations. and specifications, which are on file at the District office. Section 9: Environment:11 H ealth The state of Colorado -dandates specific mitigation requirements with regard to asbestos. Additionally, code requkements to be aware of when filing a building permit include: a prohibition on engine idling, regulation of fireplaces. fugitive dust requirements. noise abatement and pool designs. Section 10: Engineering All exterior lighting shall meet the requirements of the City's Outdoor Ughting Code pursuant to Land Use Code Section 26.575.150. Outdoor ligh/ing. Section 11: School Lands Dedication Before the Applicant is issued a Building Permit, the Applicant shall pay a fee-in-lieu of land dedication pursuant to Chapter 26.620, School Lunds Dediecition. The aniount of the fee shall be calculated by the Community Development Department using the calculation method and fee schedule in effect at the time the applicant submits a Building Permit. Section 12: Impact Fees Before the Applicant is issued a Building Permit. the Applicant shall pay a Parks Development fee and a TDM/Air Quality fee pursuant to Chapter 26.610. Impact Fees. The amount of the fees shall be calculated by the Community Development Department using the calculation method and fee schedule in effect at the time the Applicant submits a Building Perniit. Section 13: This Resolution shall not affect any existing litigation and shall not operate as an abatement of any action or proceeding now pending under or by virtue of the ordinanccs repealed or amended as herein provided. and the same shall be conducted and concluded under such prior ordinances. Section 14: If any section. subsection. sentence. clause, phrase. or portion of this Resolution is for any reason held invalid or unconstitutional in a court of competent jurisd iction. such portion shall be deemed a separate, distinct and independent provision and shall not affect the validity of the remaining portions thereof. Page 3 of 4 APPROVED by the Planning and Zoning Commission at ils regular meeting on October 16, 2012. 49921 Â« / / U Ersp:imer, Chairman U APPROVED ASTO FORM: 140/Ju Deb Quinn, Assistant City Attorney ATTEST: 4&44/ *St. 4-6 ~ackic Lottilifn, Deputy City Clerk Page 4 014 - rowland + broughton architecture end urban design 23â€¢te nopkinsave 3377 blake st, 106 aspen, co 81611 denver, co 80205 Hyman Avenue 970.544.34731 303.308.1375 f 970 544 9006 9 303.308 1373 v 444. â‚¬458\ â‚¬1.... Prit~%14 ' ~Â·:Â· f~ <43 ; 2'Al ~44>4{.1 A $ RÂ«64 Â· Â« ~ 4 Â«64* ..fia %36Â· ,- C...t, ..L... 1 1 t.*94*-9 11'i \6 %:14Â· ~3.. =- -O\ ~A~*Â·,9*7; *: v ~\3Â· '~fl'%i t.Â·~.â€ž- .,Â·, 8 ,'S - 43:,7'1 4 0 4% :71 1 ./ /\ 4 gÂ·,4 <Mwl Â· ~' \ w) 4Â· ~i,~i\.kit\:Yi '4' , ~ Al Consultants \, 11%.0.Â« . 1, .1 Tr . \16.1:117 '1% 4 ... '. 4 %1kp' ~til :'' Â·i j ;Ar Â» 0 -Â·Â·Â· a. * ,#,6 vt' .Â·b 17?STAN CLAUSON ASSOCIATES mc 4...14 -,1 41...$ A- 'CIP... ~14~, Â·,26. 16100./St.9/,flt COMâ€¢ W~**apl...1 'N-4. I.;...1 1 '...a I "arÂ« 410Â¢ h 2.6 -V ~I - , ~ u.e. - -2/ ..y 44Â· 1 1-'"Ag , .~ , Ifff/ 40. a e-z 3. - \ 1 d.91 t 4~~ â€¢J 1 91?7 . 4 0 Issue , PROPERTY LINE I * . - .*---1 - ' 04.10.2013 C*NOPYABA # I ..=I~- FINAL- COMMERCIAL- DESIGN 1 A .1 1 /1 -"k./. REVIEW --1/Milill//F - ir..4/ 1 I ff 1 4 1.. - - ---- --2-2 JJ -1-- 2 9 1-1 -1+ Dir-i , 12 2:.4 , 4. -22 H qi Â·' Ir 4 +S : t /4 11 1 I 1 1 .i iâ€¢I i:...1. , i / /1 0 to COMMERCIAL- ip.. .. 6. 7 RevisionsÂ· 08.02.2012 - 04.10.2013 ILLUSTRATIVE RENDERING ~ OPENING W' ~ GATE , STATE 1 P IN I CM I T 53 t=lt=1 L===. IN UP 2Â© I. L. -J: f --r- . 3/ 1 . 601 EAST HYMAN ==UE - -/ :<w-<<-z _____ ._ : up -4-4 '2- b' + . _-- 1 1 bl~ t AVENUE TRANSFORMER - AND PAD ~ ,==- STAIR 21 1 ~ . 1 CANOPY ABOVE - 1 \\ 1 ON' 't i i 1I PROPERTY LINEE PLANT/Al.ETTE / 1 j LANDSCAPE PLAN COMMON NAME SCIENTIFIC NAME SIZE QUANTITY ~~ SCALE- 1/4"=1'.0 GREEN ASH FRAXINUS 2.5-3- 2 PENNIYLVANICA -/2-9,-Il- 0 4 8 12 16 PROJECT NO. 21213.00 ---- DIG FILE ACER x FREEMANII 2.5-3- 4 CELEBRATION 21213_Ll.Ocwg LANDSCAPE PLAN CRI~SON PYGMY mERBERIS THUNBERGII #3 9 BARBERRY 'ATROPURPUMEA NAMAÂ· SHEET TITLE Ll.0 {~ STAN CLAUSON ASSOCHTES. INC 2013 Hunter Street Resolution Exhibit A Floor Plans 0.,t.*.KI.,Wk I KcaspÂ®,rn '4 75/': -r ' \ ....,1/ :e:'/ -7-\IlÂ·V~, - ~ f .. J 11 â€ž...om .-/ ..1 - ' . - ! 3.-11-4-01,Ar./. ..1 M.,IN 4 - -111.1,1 ........ i 2 -...2"> 11 'ar=<Â·. Â·t'.3. m Â·Â·Ii % Â· :i Â· p y' .:i , st Te.,/:A , h :nua- 8-2 :/7 -f- ...' - : 1 1 41Â· F'.29Â£ h-M.--1 E .-...... 1 . LEVEL 0 FLOOR PLAN 4.. lor. UEÂ¥41Ft,028 PldN LEVEL 2 FLOOR PLAN 4.n.â€¢trÂ£=v 3.022 2 COMMERCIAL Â£19913 Al.REA; NET LE*SABLE: â‚¬4.95}R ARâ‚¬J NET 1Â£6Â§18LE Â£!6295 ARâ‚¬& NET LEASAE* E 3.573 St x 016= o SFÂ· 1,826 SE COMMERCEAL 2,554 SF RETAIL 2,417 SP COMMERCAAL 3.162 SE OFFICE f292 SE 'tige:iNg, 191 SF STAIR EXEMPT 3456 SF FLOOR PLATE +3187 SF E)*201I 5,64:5 SE FLOOR:PUVEE F--276 / 'a.... U - 1 FLOORâ‚¬32XI.91462 EXEMPT DECK AREA LEGEND a.". 5,716 SF COMMERCIAL (75%) 2250 SF FLOOR AREA ALLOWED :.2-:r' ..Â¥ 1. 1 6.01 4. 1 -2 I NET LEASABLE FLOORAREA Â·Â·\2 6- 1 6 1 , f -= 1 1.95% sF flEJREN-fl,My (25%1 814 % FERCENTALL-09212 r 7.668 SF TOTALAREAâ‚¬100%1 337.5 SF EXEMPT DECK AREA NET LIVABLE FLOOR AREA : ~, , 11 . tt -4 r Â¢ ..41>- ....04.-It, 4- B I t] 1, i _fi lf......4 RESIDENTIAL AREAL DECKAHEA -+y k..1- DECK AREA 1L_ '1 - 4 5-. 7*1 - J- 1 2250 SF ALLOWABLE AREA 337.5 SF EXEMPT DECK AREA :12Â§2 RE TOTAL PROPOSED AREA 2228.P RE REMNNING RESIDENTIALFLOOR AREA - 1 41- 7 1 .4 :-2-43. I 1 -4- OPEN TO BELOW 298 SP REMAINING AREA 635.5 SF TOTAL DECK AREA LEVEL 3 FLOOR PLAN $*60 PROPOSED DECK AREA: NON-UNIT SPACE flggl8854 NET LNABLE: 512.0 SF DECK #1 '~~ ~ ~- -- - 1,952 SF RESIDENTIAL 1,635 SF RESIDENTiAL +123.5 SE DECK #2 EXEMPTIONS 205 SF EXEMPTIONS 6'35 5 SM TOTAL DECK AREA ' PEDESTRIAN AMENITY 19 2 IMQN=WNII 2,237 SF FIâ€žOOR PLATE -4 6.,niG i *01 MEMORANDUM TO: Sara Nadolny, Community Development Department FROM: Cindy Christensen, APCHA Operations Manager DATE: December 6.2012 RE: 601 E. Hyman (aka Victorian Square) Redevelopment ISSUE: The applicant is requesting approval to mitigate the em.ployee housing requirement by purchasing affordable housing credit certificates for the redevelopment of the 601 East Hyman properly. BACKGROUND: The project involves the demolition and replacement of the current two-story commercial building with a three-story mixed use building. Commercial space will be located in the basement. first and second floon and a single-family residence is to be located on the third level. DISCUSSION: Theapplicantis required to mitigate for the additional employees impacted by the redevelopment. The applicant is requesting t.hat the mitigation be in the fonn of the use of the affordable housing credit program. Beloware the calculations to show the mitigation requirement: Existing Proposed FrE Type Location FAR FAR Difference Multiplier X Mitigatipn Commercial Basement 0 1,826 1,826 3.075 6:0% 3.36897 Commercial 1 St Floor 3.045 2.4 17 -628 4.100 60Â°' -1.54488 /0 2,164 858 60% 1.58301 Commercial 2 floor 3,022 3,075 Residential 3rd Hoor 0 1.835 1.835 .3 30% 1.37625 TOTAL OFF SITE MITIGATION 4.78335 The residential mitigation is based on 30% of the additional square footage 01- 1.835 (550.50) divided by 400 square feet (1 employee =400 square fed ofnet livable area). Based on the above inforniation, the employee housingt mitigation required is 4.78335 FTE's that isbeing proposed to be salisfied by theÂ· purchasc ofthe affill-Jable housing credit certificates, RECOMMENDATION: The APCHA Board reviewed the application at their regular meeting held December 5, 2012 and are in agreement that providing the affordable housing credit certificates is an accepted option to satisfy tlie employee housing mitigation at the 4.78335 Il-E's. 601 E Hyman {aka Victorian Square) Redevelopment Page 1 Easy PeelÂ® Labels A Bend along line to | ~ Attachment 10 Use AveryÂ® Template 5160Â® ~ Feed Paper kat*Â«22905 expose Pop-up EdgeT'A ~ A 2012 TRUST FBI RHODA ISRAEL 85% 308 HUNTER LLC 4 SKIERS LP 708 3RD AVE 490 WILLIAMS ST 1108 NORFLEET DR NEW YORK, NY 10017 DENVER, CO 80218 NASHVILLE, TN 372201412 514 AH LLC 517 EAST HOPKINS AVENUE LLC 520 EAST COOPER PTNRS LLC 514 E HYMAN AVE 517 E HOPKINS AVE 402 MIDLAND PARK ASPEN, CO 81611 ASPEN, CO 81611 ASPEN, CO 81611 610 EAST HYMAN LLC 630 EAST HYMAN LLC 633 SPRING 11 LLC C/O CHARLES CUNNIFFE 532 E HOPKINS AVE 418 E COOPER AVE #207 610 E HYMAN AVE ASPEN, CO 81611 ASPEN, CO 81611 ASPEN, CO 81611 635 E HOPKINS LLC ANDERSON ROBERT M & LOUISE E ASPEN ART MUSEUM 532 E HOPKINS 1021 23RD ST 590 N MILL ST ASPEN, CO 81611 CHETEK, WI 54728 ASPEN, CO 81611 ASPEN GROVE ASSOCIATES LLP ASPEN BLOCK 99 LLC ASPEN CORE VENTURES LLC C/O M&W PROPERTIES 532 E HOPKINS AVE 418 E COOPER AVE #207 205 S MILL ST #301A ASPEN, CO 81611 ASPEN, CO 81611 ASPEN, CO 81611 ASPEN PLAZA LLC ASPEN SQUARE VENTURES LLP ASPEN KOEPPEL LLC PO BOX 1709 CO M&W PROPERTIES 3551 ST GAUDENS RD C/O STEVE MARCUS 205 S MILL ST STE 301A COCONUT GROVE, FL 331336530 ASPEN, CO 81612 ASPEN, CO 81611 AV STEIN LLC 19.08% AVP PROPERTIES LLC BASS CAHN 601 LLC 601 E HYMAN AVE 630 E HYMAN AVE #25 PO BOX 4060 ASPEN, CO 81611 ASPEN, CO 81611 ASPEN, CO 81612 BATTLE GERALD LIVING TRUST BELL MTN QUAL RES CONDO ASSOC BAUM ROBERT E HIXON BURT LIVING TRUS-1 LLC PO BOX 1518 PO BOX 2847 320 S SPRING ST STOCKBRIDGE, MA 01262 NEWPORT BEACH, CA 92659 ASPEN, CO 81611 BERN FAMILY ASPEN PROPERTY LLC BERSCH BLANCHE TRUST BG SPRING LLC 65 FIRST NECK LN 9642 YOAKUM DR 300 S SPRING ST #202 SOUTHAMPTON, NY 11988 BEVERLY HILLS, CA 90210 ASPEN, CO 81611 BOOGIES BUILDING OF ASPEN LLC BIG HOPKINS LLC BISCHOFF JOHN C C/O LEONARDWEINGLASS 421 N BEVERLY DR #300 502 S VIA GOLONDRINA 534 E COOPER AVE BEVERLY HILLS, CA 90210 TUCSON, AZ 85716-5843 ASPEN, CO 81611 A Atiquettes faciles A peler I Repliez & la hachure afin de I www.avery. com i Utilisez le gabarit AVERYÂ® 5160Â® chargement revaler le rebord Pop-UpMC J 1Â·800Â·GO-AVERY ' Sens de A 4| 10 I 11 Easy PeelÂ® Labels A '~~*~' Bend along line to ! ~ AVERYÂ® 5160Â® | Use AveryÂ® Template 5160Â® ~ Feed Paper - expose PopÂ·up Edgeâ„¢ 1 BORGIOTTI CLAUDIO BPOE ASPEN LODGE #224 BRONSON RICHARD L TRUST 50Â°/0 10509 HUNTING CREST LN 210 S GALENA ST #21 4510 NE DELAMAR PL VIENNA, VA 22192 ASPEN, CO 81611 LEES SUMMIT, MO 64064 CALGI RAYMOND D CARVER RUTH A & MARTIN G CAVES KAREN W 134 TEWKESBURY RD 10 BYRON LN 1 BARRENGER CT SCARSDALE, NY 10583 MUSCATINE, IA 52761 NEWPORT BEACH, CA 92660 CHATEAU ASPEN UNIT 21-A LLC CHATEAU ASPEN CONDO ASSOC CJAR LLC 421 ASPEN AIRPORT BUSINESS CTR 630 E COOPER AVE 2514 LAKE MEAD DR STE G ASPEN, CO 81611 LAFAYETTE, CO 80026 ASPEN, CO 816113551 COOPER STREET DEVELOPMENT LLC COOPER SPRINGS LLC COX JAMES E LIVING TRUST C/O PYRAMID PROPERTY ADVISORS 4 EASTON OVAL 3284 SURMONT DR 418 E COOPER AVE #207 COLUMBUS, OH 43219 LAFAYETTE, CA 94549 ASPEN, CO 81611 DCGB LLC DALY CAROL Y REV TRUST DIBRELL CHARLES G JR & FRANCES ATT GIORGIO RIGHETTI CFO 617 E COOPER 24 ADLER CIR i 610 WEST 52 ST ASPEN, CO 81611 GALVESTON, TX 77551-5828 NEW YORK, NY 10019 EB BUILDING ASPEN LLC ECCHYMOSIS LLC ELLERON CHEMICALS CORP 1601 ELM ST #4000 4802 E 2ND ST # 2 2101 WAUKEGAN RD #210 DALLAS, TX 75201 LONG BEACH, CA 90803 BANNOCKBURN, IL 60015 ERGAS VENESSA BLAIR & CLAUDE EXELCEDAR INC 20% FEHR EDITH B REVOCABLE TRUST PO BOX 4316 534 E HYMAN AVE 543 FOX RUN DR ASPEN, CO 81612 ASPEN, CO 81611 CARBONDALE, CO 81623-8502 FITZGERALD FAMILY PARTNERSHIP LTD FERRY JAMES H 11! FLY MARIE N C/O PITKIN COUNTY DRY GOODS LLC BOX 167 7447 PEBBLE POINTE 520 E COOPER GLENCOE, IL 60022-0167 W BLOOMFIELD, MI 48322 ASPEN, CO 81611 FURNGULF LTD GELD LLC GIL8ERT GARY A COLO JOINT VENTURE C/O LOWELL MEYER 1556 ROYAL BLVD 616 E HYMAN AVE PO BOX 1247 GLENDALE, CA 91207 ASPEN, CO 81611 ASPEN, CO 81612-1247 GOFEN ETHEL CARO TRUSTEE GOLDEN PANTHERS LLC GONE WEST LLC 455 CITY FRONT PLAZA 60 S MARKET ST #1400 401 W CENTER CHICAGO, IL 60611 SAN JOSE, CA 95113-2396 SEARCY, AR 721451406 Etiquettes faciles & peler i A Rei,liez & la hachure afin de I www.avery.com 5 Utilisez le gabarit AVERYÂ® 5160Â® diargement A Sens de ravdler le rebord Pop-upt'Â¢ ; 1-800-GO-4VERY ' 41 10 1 (3 Easy PeelÂ® Labels ArÂ®==9 Bend along line to 1 ~ AVERYÂ® 5160Â® ~ Use AveryÂ® Template 5160Â® J Feed Paper 1%:I'll.m expose Pop-up EdgerM ~| A GOODING SEAN A 80% & RICHARD L GORDON LEONARD & ELLEN GREENWAY COMPANY INC 20% 12204 GALESVILLE DR 666 TRAVIS ST #100 C/O PARAGON RANCH INC GAITHERSBURG, MD 20878 SHREVEPORT, LA 71101 620 E HYMAN AVE #1E ASPEN, CO 81611 HENDRICKS SIDNEY J GROSFELD ASPEN PROP PART LLC HEMP SUZANNE LIV TRUST YOLANDE EVERHARD 10880 WILSHIRE BLVD #2222 15470 POMONA RD 6614 LAKE VILLE RD LOS ANGELES, CA 90024 BROOKFIELD, WI 53005 PETALUMA, CA 94954-9256 HIMAN LLC HUNKE CARLTON J LVG TRST HORSEFINS LLC PO BOX 6159 601 E HOPKINS AVE 4410 TIMBERLINE DR SW SWANBOURNE WA 6010 ASPEN, CO 81611 FARGO, ND 58103 AUSTRALIA, HUNTER PLAZA ASSOCIATES LLP ISRAEL KENNETH 25% JENNE LLP 205 S MILL ST #301A 615 OCEAN BLVD 1510 WINDSOR RD ASPEN, CO 81611 GOLDEN BEACH, FL 33160 AUSTIN, TX 77402 JOSHUA & CO REAL ESTATE HOLDINGS JOYCE EDWARD KOEPPEL KEVIN F TRUST LLC 1310 RITCHIE CT 3551 ST GAUDENS RD 300 S HUNTER ST CHICAGO, IL 60610 COCONUT GROVE, FL 33133 ASPEN, CO 81611 LCT LP KRAJIAN RON 1<UTINSKY BRIAN TENNESSEE LIMITED PARTNERSHIP 617 ECOOPERAVE#114 26480 NORMANDY RD PO BOX 101444 ASPEN, CO 81611 FRANKLIN, MI 480251034 NASHVILLE, TN 37224-1444 MALLARD ENTERPRISES LP MARTELL BARBARA MATTHEWS ZACHARY 317 SIDNEY BAKER S #400 702 E HYMAN AVE PO BOX 10582 KERRVILLE,TX 78028 ASPEN, CO 81611 ASPEN, CO 81612 MAYFAIR INVESTMENTS LLC MCMURRAYWILLIAM & HELEN MAVROVIC ERNA PO BOX 268 29 MIDDLE HEAD RD 530 E 72ND ST APT 15-C RICHMOND VICTORIA 3121 MOSMAN NSW 2088 NEW YORK, NY 10021 AUSTRALIA, AUSTRALIA, MJM HOLDINGS 11 LLC MJM AMENDED & RESTATED TRUST MOEN DONNIE & ELIZABETH FAM TRUST 1701 GOLF RD 1776 SOUTH LN 8 CABALLEROS RD TOWER 3 STE 203 NORTHBROOK, IL 60062 ROLLING HILLS, CA 90274 ROLLING MEADOWS, IL 60008 MORRIS ROBERT P MYSKO BOHDAN D N S N ASSOCIATES INC 600 E HOPKINS AVE STE 304 615 E HOPKINS 11051 W ADDISON ST ASPEN, CO 81611 ASPEN, CO 81611 FRANKLIN PARK, IL 60131 Etiquettes faciles A peler 1 A i Repliez A la hachure afin de I www.avery.com 1 Sens de Utilisez le gabarit AVERYÂ® 5160Â® raveler le rebord Pop-up&'C J 1-800-GO-AVERY chargement i 41,0 leb ***3~22*.I Easy PeelÂ® Labels A 1%202%1 Bend along title to ~ ~ ~ AVERYÂ® 5160Â® 1 Use AveryÂ® Template 5160Â® A Feed Paper - expose PopÂ·up Edgent J - i NATTERER HELEN NEUMANN MICHAEL NIELSON COL STEVE & CAROL D 67 BAYPOINT CRES 7381 MOHASNIC DR 501 S FAIRFAX OTTAWA ONTARIO BLOOMFIELD HILLS, MI 48301 ALEXANDRIA, VA 22314 CANADA K2G6R1, NJ STEIN LLC 52.98% NONNIE LLC OBERHOLTZER JORDAN 418 E COOPER AVE #207 PO BOX 565 PO BOX 10582 ASPEN, CO 81611 ASPEN, CO 81612 ASPEN, CO 81612 OLITSKY TAMAR & STEPHEN P & L PROPERTIES LLC PACIFIC WEST INVESTMENTS LLC PO BOX 514 101 S 3RD ST #360 320 MARTIN ST #100 GWYNEDD VALLEY, PA 19437 GRAND JUNCTION, CO 81501 BIRMINGHAM. MI 480091485 PITKIN CENTER CONDO OWNERS PEARSON REBECCA J PETERSON CHRISPY & JAMES E ASSOC 1610 JOHNSON DR 867 HAVEN CREST CT NORTH 517 W NORTH ST STILLWATER, MN 55082 GRAND JUNCTION, CO 81506 ASPEN, CO 81611 PITKIN COUNTY BANK 80% PLATNIUM GLOBAL VENTURES LLC PORTE BROOKE 534 E HYMAN AVE 344 PROSPECT ST #D 3520 PADDOCK RD ASPEN, CO 81611 LA JOLLA, CA 92037 WESTON, FL 33331 RAHLEK LTD AT BANK OF AMERICA RED FLOWER PROP CO PTNSHP REICH DANIEL S TRUST 20% 3903 BELLAIRE BLVD 575 MADISON AVE #1006 6 RINCON ST HOUSTON, TX 77025 NEW YORK, NY 100222511 ]IRVINE, CA 92702 REICH MELVIN L TRUST 80% REUSS L]GHT LLC REVOLUTION PARTNERS LLC 4609 SEASHORE DR PO BOX 5000 PO BOX 1247 NEWPORT BEACH, CA 92663 SNOWMASS VILLAGE, CO 81615 ASPEN, CO 81612 RG COOPER ST 4.83% ROSS JOHN F RUBENSTEIN ALAN B & CAROL S C/O RONALD GARFIELD 7600 CLAYTON RD 57 OLDFIELD DR 601 E HYMAN AVE ST LOUIS, MO 63117 SHERBORN, MA 01770 ASPEN, CO 81611 RUST TRUST RUTLEDGE REYNIE S & S REALTY PARTNERS LLC 9401 WILSHIRE BLVD #760 51 COUNTRY CLUB CIR 1040 FIFTH AVE #2C BEVERLY HILLS, CA 90212 SEARCY, AR 72143 NEW YORK, NY 10028 SANDIFER C W JR TRUST 50% SCHEUERMAN JOANNE E SCHNITZER KENNETH L & LISA L 240 LINDEN DR 200 LOCUST ST #23A 2100 MCKINNEYAVE #1760 BOULDER, CO 80304 PHILADELPHIA, PA 19106 DALLAS, TX 75201 Etiquettes faciles A peler Repliez A la hachure afin de 1 www.avery.com 1 Sensde i Utilisez le gabarit AVERYÂ® 5160Â® chargement ravaler le rebord Pop-upMC J 1-800-GO-AVERY A 4 1 to I (3 Easy PeelÂ® Labels A Bend along line to | Use AveryÂ® Template 5160Â® ~ Feed Paper - expose Pop-up EdgerM ~ ~ AVERYÂ® 5160Â® ~ SEGUIN JEFF W & MADALYN B TRUST SEGUIN MARY E TRUST SHUMATE MARK 617 ECOOPER#412 2404 LORING ST #155 BLDG 421 G ABC ASPEN, CO 81611 SAN DIEGO, CA 92109 ASPEN, CO 81611 SILVER DIP EQUITY VENTURE LLC SJA ASSOCIATES LLC STEIN BUILDING LLC 23.11% 2100 MCKINNEY STE 1760 418 E COOPER AVE #207 601 E HYMAN AVE DALLAS, TX 75201 ASPEN, CO 81611 ASPEN, CO 81611 STERLING TRUST COMP STRUDEL HOLDINGS LLC SUITE 300 OFFICE LLC 2091 MANDEVILLE CYN RD 314 S GALENA ST 567 SAN NICOLAS DR PENTHOUSE LOS ANGELES, CA 90049 ASPEN, CO 81611 NEWPORT BEACH, CA 92660 TENNESSEE THREE RENTALS TENNESSEE THREE TERMINELLO DENNIS J & KERRY L C/O J H COBLE PO BOX 101444 656 RIDGEWAY 5033 OLD HICKORY BLVD NASHVILLE, TN 37224-1444 WHITE PLAINS, NY 10605-4323 NASHVILLE, TN 37218-4020 THOMPSON ROSS & LYNETTE TOMKINS FAMILY TRUST TREUER CHRISTIN L 1502 GREYSTONE DR 520 E COOPER AVE #209 981 E BRIARWOOD CIR N CARBONDALE, CO 81623 ASPEN,CO 81611 LITTLETON, CO 80122 VARADY LOTHAR & CHERYL TRUST VAUSE FAMILY TRUST WALLEN-OSTERAA REV LIVING TRUST 5036 MAUNALANI CIR 3020 PLAZA DE MONTE 36 OCEAN VISTA HONOLULU, HI 96816 LAS VEGAS, NV 89102 NEWPORT BEACH, CA 92660 WALLING REBECCA WARNKEN MARK G WAVO PROPERTIES LP 350 BLANCA AVE PO BOX 556 512 1/2 E GRAND AVE #200 TAMPA, FL 33606 STILLWATER, MN 550820556 DES MOINES, IA 50309-1942 WEIDEL LAWRENCE W WEIGAND BROTHERS LLC WELLS RICHARD A & SUSAN T TRUST PO BOX 1007 150 N MARKET 100 N TRYON ST 47TH FLR MONROE, GA 30655 WICHITA, KS 67202 CHARLOTTE,NC 28202 WF SWEARINGEN LLC WILLIAMS CRAIG & LEE FAM PTNRSHP WISE JOSEPH ; 380 FOREST HILL RD 5577 CEDAR CREEK 1320 HODGES ST MACON, GA 31210 HOUSTON, TX 77056 RALEIGH, NC 27604-1414 WM SNOWMASS LLC WOLF LAWRENCE G TRUSTEE WOODS FRANK J 111 500 FIFTH AVE #2440 22750 WOODWARD AVE #204 51027 HWY 6 & 24 STE 100 NEW YORK, NY 10110 FERNDALE, MI 48220 GLENWOOD SPRINGS. CO 81601 Atiquettes faciles A peler ' Sens de 1 A Repliez A la hachure afin de 1 www.avery.com 1 Utilisez le gabarit AVERYÂ® 5160Â® chargement rdv*ler le rebord PopÂ·.upt,c J 1-800-GO-AVERY ' , k 41 fo { a Easy PeelÂ® Labels A Bend along line to I ~ AVERYÂ® 5160Â® I Use AveryÂ® Template 5160Â® J Feed Paper -~-20* expose Pop-up Edgeâ„¢ ~ * WRIGHT CHRISTOPHER N YERAMIAN CHARLES REV TRUST 13 BRAMLEY RD PO BOX 12347 LONDON W10 6SP UK, ASPEN, CO 81612 Etiquettes faciles A peter 1 Repliez A la hachure afin de 1 www.avery.com 1 Sens de 1-800-GO-AVERY Utilisez le gabarit AVERYÂ® 5160Â® chargement ruvdler le rebord Pop.upe< 1 1 41 Jo ! 13 1 4----2-1- Â·--Â·............. Je,J. ~!â€ž,~6-$ ..~*n,AÂ¥,u..se, ~ n ~~~~~#~(L U ~â€¢Â·~L Â·,4.- â€¢ 1 - Â· Â· IA , L ' 0 50 100 A E 1 t E HOPKINS AVE Feet 1 \N=1 S / ~ of the features depicted and is not a legal This map/drawing/image is a graphical representation ~ \ representation. The accuracy may change F i .. -â„¢. TROYERTROUSDALE 1 TOWNHOMES- <-.. - Â£_ CONDOA*st 1-L-1 Ill E--1 m tyâ‚¬ depending on the enlargement or reduction. 41 ;1 LspEQU 54%'E-~1 ' ~ Copyright 2013 Aspen/Pitkin GIS $ 4- -----~-, r. , 517 EAST, -~ ASPEN 71 HOPKINS *1 - PLAZA ' 6-601 East# : i i ~BLOCK HOPKINS 4/9/2013 11:43:02 AM C:\GISkemp\,AprJ!13\601EHymanAve. nud ; : AVENUE LLC L LLC , Hopkins.A,~~Troyedrrousdale fl 99 LLC j LLC 41 lownhohles, It i :I ./... b X-94=J . - 601 EAST I LI- L., 1 1. ROPENS , * 13-7 0 2 I 2 / 1 1 (:ONDAASSOC A 4 1- .--Ii I t...... i 700 EAST , E-: i BPPE . i 610 EAST ;i TariiSE284 r-- f 2 - ~- f_.i-LEI r-1 1 ~4 r -'i ~ { CONDO Â¥ HYMAN LIC' - C --504!69 -'1Â·Â·=r-=*=gr.4 f HYMAN 1 9 1 ~} ' ASSOC 1514~JI lt- J .1-4- i 'czwt j rÂ·---- r-t 1 illb i s v r..,ASS. 2 ~IL L.-, i s LL EB'~BUILDING --la.J FURNGULF ,_ -- ........... #.- itt i i,i l,* i . .ASJA j : 1 , BANK 80% ! ~ASPEN LLC LTD L-I ,-.....:A ..: 6 ~-.--Off~4~.1 ~!.-ASS,~~AT~S~r*Â¢ ~ ~ -- -- -- 700 East l 11 Hymin [ 1 ..p 1 Gl Iiil| -- .....-:., ..#% 4 PITKIN % 6- CENTERS ' ' TAMARAWOOD trandall g 11:=2,6,1 -f *L-*;l-,r- I I ? 1 1 1 1 1 <-4801 -I CONDO ASSOC -laW**%/. ~ 6..-J 16--# 1 1- CON&%2411%t7 ~ f ~ ~ --Â» 0~ ~3- ~Â· - --. .- - ---+.-- '. ~ --" -~ I J E HYMAN AVE f Z L / / ,A 7 -7 1 .:300.SQUTH ~0 . SPRING STi =r=--Â¥ CONDOASSOCN' 1 M. 1.'..'.1 1 r.1/.11 (7-7 ASPEN ART ~ ~~ 7 411 COX JAMES Spnng ~l I ASPEN CORE i 633 299 South -=IF i : 161 11 liti E LIVING ~ VENTURES - SPRING 11 MUSEUM 1 47' 1 -â€¢irt i i TRUST , ~ LLC rd LLC , 11 i il L 1 308 i i ,- v t , 1 - 116:29: t- 1 - ~ t ~ ~ 6-*.rHUNTER 1 j 1 ' f Lit 1% 1 '3~ite._~ 1 -3-1 1 1 11 ! ,-~W-%=L CE. .ri -C- --- -71 **Nibii f---- =,1- DCGB LLC lig-(0-N-%*djor--Â·1 [t -- - - *~ ----.-.r- , 1 L REVOLUTION , 4 L.r~~**cNEEe-tr-1 --i'-7 f- ' i HUNTE<PLAZAI *~,1 . 1-.] ~ 43.11 I Mountain ' j PARTNERS t 1 4 a j r CONCOASSOC 1 llc -1 f i Btr'N~~~ ~t i ,! 11 , 1 1 ~ ~BUILDING F 1 dtjateau F -r~*:1-- - At 1 : PUD 1 1 1 1 - il; i li o aL-Â« ~ -- :Â·ti -~Â·~Â·Â·--t--9--Â·.- -1 ~ASPEN Lttl ASSOCIATES LLP, ~-~~'i~6-**0*;*~-*~ \ *; Â· . FAspenhof , 1 1 i 1 04-1 1 1 1 1 Ill r., ' :1 1 1 1.1 m ) 5 Ill. ' ' I I ' Â· -{AL 2 6':*44.5.,Mi-J -6,01-*9,4--9* -7 z f 1 1. qpqper -7-[Irr'~1.1 | 1 - . CHATEAU AspkEâ€ž~,~ '44' BELL MOUNTAIN Pr E ft. '- ~Stred.1 - -:-4 't~-3-- --7 1 'L_.3-(,ADO AtiC)t ~ . QUALIFIED RESIDENCES , 'Sk L , Â£ E COOPER AVE r Un , 1.- 1 - 1 -I. 6,~y h r...1-4 1 f lilli! 1,1 1 2, 1 i i -1 1 1 ': ' ASPEN GROyE f Square_ _! 1 1 1 | c ' ' i | ASSOCIATES 3-0-33 ~ LILLI ; n ! BowmanÂ· . t,Iii 1- 1 l~-t_t i i i n 1 r--2 1 - i 4 ULNJ STEIN ASPEN SQUARE __LLC 52.98% CONDOASSOC BLD B=* --' 71 1 4-4Ah'~9' ~"m . 1Â»-1 e I 111111.11 â€ž -11 11-L-/ J S HUNTERST Attachment 11 CITY OF ASPEN PRE-APPLICATION CONFERENCE SUMMARY PLANNER: Sara Nadolny, 429-2739 DATE: 3.29.2013 PROJECT: 601 E. Hyman Ave - Victorian Square - Redevelopment REPRESENTATIVE: Stan Clauson Associates Inc. DESCRIPTION: The potential applicant is interested in demolishing the existing two-story commercial building and replacing it with a three-story mixed-use building that will contain two floors of commercial space and a one floor of free-market residential space. For this review, the applicant will be required to show how the project's final design conforms to the applicable Commercial, Lodging and Historic District Design Objectives and Guidelines and other applicable sections of the Land Use Code. The applicant received conceptual commercial design approval from P&Z on October 16, 2012 through Resolution No. 19, Series of 2012, and GMQS/Subdivision approvals from P&Z on December 401 2012 through Resolution No. 22, Series of 2012. The applicant has received approval to construct a mixed-use building that contains 7,265 sf of net leasable area and 1,835 sf of net livable area. 2,056 growth management allotments were approved and allocated for the increase in net leasable space, and one growth management allotment was approved and allocated for the multi- family free-market residential unit. The latter Resolution also grants the applicant approval to meet the affordable housing mitigation requirement through the purchase of a Certificate of Affordable Housing Credit for the required 4.79 FTE's at a deed-restricted Category 4 or lower. The Certificate of Affordable Housing Credits shall be extinguished by the City prior to issuance of building permit. The provision of off-street parking is not required with this application, and no off-street parking has been proposed. The applicant has submitted a signed and notarized Notice to Vacate Condominium Plat for Units 1 -7 and a Notice to Vacate All Covenants for Victorian Square Condominiums, which have been signed by Andrew Hecht, Vice President of Victorian Square LLC. Therefore the applicant is not required to pursue Subdivision in a public hearing before the City Council. Impact fees, triggered by the addition of new let leasable and net livable space, will be calculated at the time of building permit issuance. Neighborhood outreach, prior to public hearing is a requirement of this review. Relevant Land Use Code Section(s): Land Use Code Section(s) 26.304 Common Development Review Procedures 26.304.035 Neighborhood Outreach 26.412 Commercial Design Review 26.610 Impact Fees 26.710.150 Commercial (Cl) Zone District The Land Use Code is found here: http://www.aspenpitkin.com/Departments/Communitv-Development/Planning- and-Zoning/Title-26-Land-Use-Code/ The Commercial, Lodging and Historic District Design Objectives and Guidelines are found here: http://www.aspenpitkin.com/Departments/Community-Development/Planning-and-Zoning/Current-Planning/ The Land Use application is found here: http://www.aspenpitkin.com/Departments/Community- Development/Planning-and-Zoning/Applications-and-Fees/ . Review by: - Staff for complete application - Referral agencies for technical considerations - P&Z for Final Commercial Design approval Public Hearing: Yes, P&Z Neighborhood Outreach: Yes, prior to P&Z public hearing Planning Fees: $4,550 for fourteen (14) hours of staff time. Additional staff time required will be billed at $325/hour. Referral Fees: Engineering, billed at $265/hour (1 hour deposit) Parks, billed at $650 (flat fee) Total Deposit: $ 5,465 Total Number of Application Copies: 10 for P&Z application. To apply, submit the following information: 1. Total Deposit for review of application. 2. Applicant's name, address and telephone number, contained within a letter signed by the applicant stating the name, address, and telephone number of the representative authorized to act on behalf of the applicant, 3. Street address and legal description of the parcel on which development is proposed to occur, consisting of a current certificate from a title insurance company, or attorney licensed to practice in the State of Colorado, listing the names of all owners of the property, and all mortgages, judgments, liens, easements, contracts and agreements affecting the parcel, and demonstrating the owner's right to apply for the Development Application. 4. Completed Land Use Application. 5. Signed fee agreement. 6. Pre-application Conference Summary. 7. An 8 1/2" x 11" vicinity map locating the subject parcel within the City of Aspen. 8. Proof of ownership. 9. Existing and proposed elevation drawings and site plan that include proposed dimensional requirements as well as landscaping plan. 10. Elevations of the proposed building and the buildings in the Hyman block to compare overall heights, storefront heights and massing. 11, A written description of the proposal and an explanation in written, graphic, or model form of how the proposed development complies with the review standards relevant to the development application. Please include existing conditions as well as proposed. 11. All other materials required pursuant to the specific submittal requirements. 12. Site improvement survey including topography and vegetation showing the current status, including all easements and vacated rights of way, of the parcel certified by a registered land surveyor, licensed in the state of Colorado, 13. Applicants are advised that building plans will be required to meet the International Building Code as adopted by the City of Aspen, the Federal Fair Housing Act, and CRS 9.5.112. Please make sure that your application submittal addresses these building-related and accessibility regulations. You may contact the Building Department at 920-5090 for additional information. 14. List of adjacent property owners within 300' for public hearing 15. Copies of prior approvals. 16. Applications shall be provided in paper format (number of copies noted above) as well as the text only on either of the following digital formats. Disclaimer: The foregoing summary is advisory in nature only and is not binding on the City. The summary is based on current zoning, which is subject to change in the future, and upon factual representations that may or may not be accurate. The summary does not create a legal or vested right.