Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutcoa.lu.ca.135 Miners Trail.0010.2015.aslu1 0010.2015. ASLU 135 MINERS TRAIL CODE INTERPRETATION 273707323004 • C Lj THE CITY OF ASPEN City of Aspen Community Development Department CASE NUMBER PARCEL ID NUMBERS PROJECTS ADDRESS PLANNER CASE DESCRIPTION DATE OF FINAL ACTION 0010.2015.ASLU 273707323004 135 MINERS TRAIL HILLARY SEMINICK CODE INTERPRETATION KIM WEIL 02/20/2015 CLOSED BY ROBERT GREGOR ON: 5/21/15 CITY OF ASPEN COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT LAND USE CODE INTERPRETATION JURISDICTION: APPLICABLE CODE SECTIONS: EFFECTIVE DATE: WRITTEN BY: APPROVED BY: 4111d Date: February 20, 2015 COPIES TO: City of Aspen 26.104,100, Definitions February 20, 2015 Hillary Seminick, Planner Technician Chris Bendon, Community Development Director City Planning Staff SUMMARY: This Land Use Code interpretation clarifies how an architectural element at 135 Miners Trail is defined and measured. This interpretation was initiated by Kim Weil of Poss Architecture. BACKGROUND: A change order was submitted for building permit number 0013.2014.ARBK for a residence at 135 Miners Trail. This change order included an architectural feature with a fire and water element on the second story of the structure. The Zoning Officer determined this feature was intended to screen the view and would in effect be a fence. The element is on the rear of the building. Fences along the rear aspect of a building are required to be no more than 6' in height. The feature in question is 7'. The requestor disagrees with the Zoning Officer's assessment of the element as a fence, and has requested a formal interpretation. DISCUSSION: Staff relied on three (2) sections of the Land Use Code to render this Land Use Code interpretation. Citations: A. 26.104.100 Definitions, Fence Fence. A constructed barrier, including berms, intended to prevent escape or intrusion or to mark a boundary or shield or screen view or to perform any similar function. (See, Supplementary Regulations — Section 26.575.050, Fences) B. 26.104.100 Definitions, Structure Structure. Anything constructed installed or erected which requires location on the ground or is attached/supported by something on the ground inclusive of buildings, signs, roads, walkways, berms, fences and/or walls greater than six feet (6) in height, tennis courts, Definitions Rendered February 20, 2015 Page 1 of 4 swimming pools and the like, but excluding poles, lines, cables or similar devices used in the transmission or distribution of public utilities. Citation A defines a fence as either an earthen or fabricated barrier that blocks egress or obstructs a view or like function. Citation B defines structure as an element that includes buildings, fences and/or walls greater than six feet (6) in height. A structure requires location in the ground. INTERPRETATION: The feature in question is a projection made of stone that bisects the home and frames the southwest aspect of the deck on the rear portion of the home. The feature starts at grade and projects approximately seven (7) -feet above the surface of the deck. The feature has a decorative fire and water element on the aspect that faces the deck interior. The feature appears to be integrated into the building interior and is structural in nature. According to Citation B, a Structure is inclusive of a fence or wall or building which requires location on the ground or is attached/supported by something on the ground. The feature is located on the ground, meeting the definition of structure and appears to be an integral part of the building. As noted in Citation A, a fence is a barrier intended to mark a boundary and prevents access while shielding the view. The feature in question does shield the view; however, a boundary is not marked with the element, rather, the element is projected from the building. The element does not fall within the definition of fence; therefore, the feature is subject to the height limitations of the underlying zone district. The element on the south side of the building shielding mechanical equipment does fall within the fence definition and is limited to six (6) feet in height. APPEAL OF DECISION: Any person with a right to appeal an adverse decision or determination shall initiate an appeal by filing a notice of appeal on a form prescribed by the Community Development Director. The notice of appeal shall be filed with the Community Development Director and with the City office or department rendering the decision or determination within fourteen (14) days of the date of the decision or determination being appealed. Failure to file such notice of appeal within the prescribed time shall constitute a waiver of any rights under this Title to appeal any decision or determination. Definitions Rendered February 20, 2015 Page 2 of 4 PUBLIC NOTICE RE: INTERPRETATION OF THE LAND USE CODE — DEFINITIONS NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that a code interpretation regarding the definition of fence, Section 26.104.100, Definitions of the City of Aspen Land Use Code, requested by Poss Architecture on behalf of Charif Souki, was rendered on February 20, 2015 and is available for public inspection in the Community Development Department. For further information contact Hillary Seminick at the City of Aspen Community Development Department, 130 S Galena St, Aspen, CO, (970) 429-2741. Published in the Aspen Times on May 7th, 2015 City of Aspen Account pOS$ ARCHITECTURE+PLANNING January 23, 2015 Chris Bendon Community Development Director City of Aspen 130 South Galena Street, Third Floor, Aspen, CO. 81611 Dear Chris: Charif Souki the owner of Lot 4 in the Mocklin Subdivision whose address and phone number are as follows: Charif Souki c/o Brooke Peterson PO Box 4068 Aspen, CO 81612 920.2619 does hereby appoint Kim Weil whose address and phone number are as follows: Poss Architecture 605 East Main Street Aspen, CO 81611 Attn.: Kim Weil 925.4755 to act on his behalf in the appeal of the land use code interpretation regarding the definition of a fence for the following property: 135 Miners Trail Aspen, CO 81611 Parcel ID Number: 273707323004 if you have any questions. 605 EAST MAIN STREET ASPEN, CO 81611 (t) 970/925-4755 (f) 970/920-2950 WWW.BILLPOSS.COM pOSS ARCHITECTURE+PLANNING January 23, 2015 Chris Bendon Community Development Director City of Aspen 130 South Galena Street, Third Floor, Aspen, CO. 81611 Dear Chris: The owner of the property located at 135 Miners Trail (Lot 4 Mocklin Subdivision) are filing this appeal to your office's interpretation that a wall located on the west side of an upper level deck is in fact a fence and as such is subject to the six foot maximum height limit for such structures. We feel that this determination that an architectural element that is attached to the residence, on the second level, within the building envelope, and below the maximum permitted height limit be labelled as a fence is incorrect. The land use code does define/regulate fences on residential properties in several sections. Among those are 26.104.100 Definitions, 26.575.050 Fence Materials, 26.575.020.E.5 Measuring Setbacks, and 26.410.040.A.3 Site Design. After reviewing all of those sections we contend that the proposed wall on the Mocklin project is not in any way covered by these provisions of the land use code. The definition in Section 26.104.100 reads as follows: "A constructed barrier, including berms, intended to prevent escape or intrusion or to mark a boundary or shield or screen view or to perform any similar function. (See, Supplementary Regulations — Section 26.575.050, Fences)" This is a very broad definition that directs you to Section 26.575.050 for more detailed information and which in fact reads: "Fences shall be permitted in every zone district, provided that no fence shall exceed six (6) feet above natural grade or as otherwise regulated by the Residential Design Standards (see Chapter 26.410), Historic Preservation Design Guidelines (see Chapter 26.415), the Commercial Design Standards (see Chapter 26.412), Calculations and Measurements - setbacks (see Chapter 26.575.020.5), or the Engineering Design Standards (see landscaping). Fences visible from the public right-of-way shall be constructed of wood, stone, wrought iron, concrete, metal, wire, or masonry. Chain link, plastic, vinyl or synthetic fences are prohibited." To us the key phrase in this section reads as follows: "no fence shall exceed six (6) feet above natural grade". The words "above natural grade" clearly identifies the intent of this section is to control the height of ground borne fences. Reading further in Section 26.575.050 reference is made the Residential Standards. Within the Residential Design Standards, Section 26.410.040.A.3 states as follows: 605 EAST MAIN STREET ASPEN, CA 81611 (0 970/925-4755 M 970/920-2950 WWW.BILLPOSS.COM pOSS ARCHITECTURE+PLANNING "3. Fences. Fences, hedgerows and planter boxes shall not be more than forty-two (42) inches high, measured from natural grade, in all areas forward of the front facade of the house. Man- made berms are prohibited in the front yard setback." Again, the reference is to height above natural grade. In fact, the graphic accompanying this section only shows fences occurring on the ground. The remaining sections referenced in 26.575.050 are not relevant to the Mocklin property. Chapter 26.415 Historic Preservation Design Guidelines deals only with historic properties or those within an identified historic district and as such does not pertain to this property. Chapter 26.412 Commercial Design Standards only deals with commercial properties. Chapter 26.575.020.5 outlines allowed encroachments into setbacks and is not relevant in this case since the wall in question is entirely within the platted building envelope. Finally, the Engineering Design Standards only control fences to the extent that they would not create a hazard to traffic and is not relevant to this situation. In summary, we feel the intent of the land use code was to control the location and height of ground borne fences. There is no reference in the land use code to the occurrence of above grade fences. We are therefore appealing your office's decision and are respectfully requesting a formal written determination/interpretation as to your office's position on this manner. For your review we have included model shots of the area in question. If you have any questions, or would like to meet to discuss this issue further, please do not hesitate to contact me. 605 EAST MAIN STREET ASPEN, CO 81611 (t) 970/925-4755 (f) 970/920-2950 WWW.BILLPOSS.COM c) LLI O cn 0 ry H W_ J Q ry LJJ Q ir Ail Jr, ATTACHMENT 2 —LAND USE APPLICATION PR03ECT: Name: Souki Residence Location: 135 Miners Trail, Lot 4 Mocklin Subdivision (Indicate street address, lot & block number, legal description where appropriate) Parcel ID # (REQUIRED) 273707323004 APPLICANT: Name: Charif Souki Address: c/o Brooke Peterson PO Box 4068 Aspen, CO 81612 Phone #: 9 2 5 - 2 619 REPRESEN'TXMIE: Name: Kim Weil Address: Poss Architecture 605 East Main Street Aspen, CO Phone#: 925-4755 TYPE ov APPLICATION: (please check all that apply): ❑ GMQS Exemption ❑ Conceptual PUD ❑ Temporary Use ❑ GMQS Allotment ❑ Final PUD (& PUD Amendment) ❑ Text/Map Amendment ❑ Special Review ❑ Subdivision ❑ Conceptual SPA ❑ ESA — 8040 Greenline, Stream ❑ Subdivision Exemption (includes ❑ Final SPA (& SPA Margin, Hallam Lake Bluff, condominiumization) Amendment) Mountain View Plane ❑ Commercial Design Review ❑ Lot Split ❑ Small Lodge Conversion/ Expansion ❑ Residential Design Variance ❑ Lot Line Adjustment ® Other: Code Interpt ❑ Conditional Use EXISTING CONDITIONS: (description of existing buildings, uses, previous approvals, etc,) Single family residence under construction PROPOSAL: (description of proposed buildings, uses, modifications, etc.) Land Use Code Interpretation (.q'PP ai i-ac 11mPnt �) Have you attached the following? FEES DUE: S 81 . 0 0 ® Pre -Application Conference Summary ® Attachment #1, Signed Fee Agreement ❑ Response to Attachment 03, Dimensional Reqtiirements FqFm N/A ❑ Response to Attachment #4, St'bmittalRequiIenients N/A ElN/A All plans that are larger than 8.5" X 11" must be folded. A disk with an electric copy of all written text (Microsoft Word Format) must be submitted as part of the application. Large scale projects should include an electronic 3-D model. Yoin- pre -application conference summary will indicate if you must submit a 3-1) model. Agreement to Pay Application Fees Rn aareement netween the GIty Ot ana Property Phone No.: 9 2 5 - 2 619 Owner ("I"): Charif SOuki Email: brooke.peterson@ajax-holdings.coff Address of Billing c/o Brooke Peterson Property: 135 Miners Trail Address: PO Box 4068 (subject of (send bills here) application) Aspen, CO 81612 understand that the City has adopted, via Ordinance No. , Series of 2011, review fees for Land Use applications and the payment of these fees is a condition precedent to determining application completeness. I understand that as the property owner that I am responsible for paying all fees for this development application. For flat fees and referral fees: I agree to pay the following fees for the services indicated. I understand that these fiat fees are non-refundable. $.0 flat fee for Select Dept $ 0 flat fee for Select Dept $ 0 flat fee for Select Dept $ 0 flat fee for Select Review For deposit cases only: The City and I understand that because of the size, nature or scope of the proposed project, it is not possible at this time to know the full extent or total costs involved in processing the application. I understand that additional costs over and above the deposit may accrue. I understand and agree that it is impracticable for City staff to complete processing, review, and presentation of sufficient information to enable legally required findings to be made for project consideration, unless invoices are paid in full. The City and I understand and agree that invoices mailed by the City to the above listed billing address and not returned to the City shall be considered by the City as being received by me. I agree to remit payment within 30 days of presentation of an invoice by the City for such services. I have read, understood, and agree to the Land Use Review Fee Policy including consequences for non-payment. I agree to pay the following initial deposit amounts for the specified hours of staff time. I understand that payment of a deposit does not render an application complete or compliant with approval criteria. If actual recorded costs exceed the initial deposit, I agree to pay additional monthly billings to the City to reimburse the City for the processing of my application at the hourly rates hereinafter stated. $ deposit for hours of Community Development Department staff time. Additional time above the deposit amount will be billed at $325 per hour. $ deposit for 0 hours of Engineering Department staff time. Additional time above the deposit amount will be billed at $265 per hour. City of Aspen: Chris Bendon Community Development Director City Use: Title: Attorney for Charif Souki Fees Due: $ Received: $ 2013130 1 Agreement to Pay Application Fees An aareement between the Glty of Aspen ('(.;ity") and Property Chloe Vine Phone No.: 011.447752.099876 Owner ("I"): Email: chloevine@me.com Address of 845 Roaring Fork Road Billing 11 Field Rd. Property: Aspen, CO Address: Oxford, United Kingdom (subject of (send bills here) g application) OX2 6QE I understand that the City has adopted, via Ordinance No. , Series of 2011, review fees for Land Use applications and the payment of these fees is a condition precedent to determining application completeness. I understand that as the property owner that I am responsible for paying all fees for this development application. For flat fees and referral fees: I agree to pay the following fees for the services indicated. I understand that these flat fees are non-refundable. $ 0 flat fee for Select Dept $ 0 flat fee for Select Dept $ 0 flat fee for Select Dept $ 0 flat fee for Select Review For deposit cases only: The City and I understand that because of the size, nature or scope of the proposed project, it is not possible at this time to know the full extent or total costs involved in processing the application. I understand that additional costs over and above the deposit may accrue. I understand and agree that it is impracticable for City staff to complete processing, review, and presentation of sufficient information to enable legally required findings to be made for project consideration, unless invoices are paid in full. The City and I understand and agree that invoices mailed by the City to the above listed billing address and not returned to the City shall be considered by the City as being received by me. I agree to remit payment within 30 days of presentation of an invoice by the City for such services. I have read, understood, and agree to the Land Use Review Fee Policy including consequences for non-payment. I agree to pay the following initial deposit amounts for the specified hours of staff time. I understand that payment of a deposit does not render an application complete or compliant with approval criteria. If actual recorded costs exceed the initial deposit, I agree to pay additional monthly billings to the City to reimburse the City for the processing of my application at the hourly rates hereinafter stated. $ 650 deposit for 2 hours of Community Development Department staff time. Additional time above the deposit amount will be billed at $325 per hour. $ 0 deposit for 0 hours of Engineering Department staff time. Additional time above the deposit amount will be billed at $265 per hour. City of Aspen: Chris Bendon Community Development Director Property Owner: Name: Chloe Vine City Use: Title: Owner Fees Due: $ 650 Received: $ ATTACHMENT 2 -LAND USE APPLICATION PROJECT: Name: V1"V 1zr'41PF'0z.e— Location: S &Ae oft nK.D. P twwotjo Q EN GoN A L..Ny Gar Indicate street address, lot & block number, legal description where a ro riate Parcel ID #(REQUIRED) 2 351210 o IS APPLICANT: Name: /,Iiwy Vlwc Address: 11 FyF1ELO IZfl., D>teota , Uotno 14=19400ly t X;L (,salt Phone #: Oil - 44 "S.2 • Q 9 q 814! REPRESENTATIVE: Name: �TEt/6f.� (AX'eVA Address: ft o o 64 61M 40ft. epo1RT14 Delve, 1:;)6 1QV ESZ. co SO Za It Phone#: ?j' O?j • %jSS • .►2�l00 TYPE OF APPLICATION: (please check all that apply): ❑ GMQS Exemption ❑ Conceptual PUD ❑ Temporary Use ❑ GMQS Allotment ❑ Final PUD (& PUD Amendment) ❑ Text/Map Amendment ❑ Special Review ❑ Subdivision ❑ Conceptual SPA ❑ ESA — 8040 Greenline, Stream ❑ Subdivision Exemption (includes ❑ Final SPA (& SPA Margin, Hallam Lake Bluff, condominiumization) Amendment) Mountain View Plane ❑ Commercial Design Review ❑ Lot Split ❑ Small Lodge Conversion/ Expansion 1[� Residential Design Variance ❑ Lot Line Adjustment ❑ Other: ❑ Conditional Use EXISTING CONDITIONS: (description of existing buildings, uses, previous approvals, etc.) EX1�'1uG1 ��N�LE �lTORY QE'S�DENGE. PROPOSAL: (description of proposed buildings, uses, modifications, etc.) �ErJo1/A-r�o� � QDD1.1'loeJS To E� IST1eJ� '�Slfl61iJG� e you attached the following? FEES DUE: $ lOSO Pre -Application Conference Summary Attachment #1, Signed Fee Agreement Response to Attachment #3, Dimensional Requirements Form Response to Attachment #4, Submittal Requirements- Including Written Responses to Review Standards ❑ 3-D Model for large project All plans that are larger than 8.5" X 11" must be folded. A disk with an electric copy of all written text (Microsoft Word Format) must be submitted as part of the application. Large scale projects should include an electronic 3-D model. Your pre -application conference summary will indicate if you must submit a 3-D model. ATTACHMENT 3 DIMENSIONAL REQUIREMENTS FORM Project: V 1W Applicant: LH&.oEy10C Location: &s* lZoAR..t NA FoRiL Qp. Zone District: lZ - is Lot Size: .Zli,942. SF Lot Area: A4,as3 s& (for the purposes of calculating Floor Area, Lot Area may be reduced for areas within the high water mark, easements, and steep slopes. Please refer to the definition of Lot Area in the Municipal Code.) Commercial net leasable: Existing: Proposed: Number of residential units: Existing: Proposed: � Number of bedrooms: Existing: 4 Proposed: Proposed % of demolition (Historic properties only): DIMENSIONS: Floor Area: Existing: p.o llowable: S lra Proposed: Principal bldg. height: Existing: It'- IfAllowable: ,?' SProposed: 12'• S �' Access. bldg. height: Existing. N A Allowable:�VLA Proposed: On -Site parking: Existing: _Required: .Z Proposed: rZ % Site coverage: Existing. Required: N A Proposed: NJA % Open Space: Existing.•__01A Required: !J A Proposed: Front Setback: Existing: 2!;, 8 + Required: .2Y' Proposed. *. $ ' Rear Setback: Existing: " Required: 10 t Proposed: 1.1 Combined F/R: Existing: JJ/ A Required: N A Proposed: Side Setback: Existing: WA Required: N A Proposed:4. /J A Side Setback: Existing: /J A Required: _ IV LA Proposed: Combined Sides: Existing: t to Required: N A Proposed: LJ A Distance Between Existing N A Required.•__"IA Proposed: Buildings Existing non -conformities or encroachments:/ •�e.pAt 5TX,,C1*gC *s &.r Qm"j-L-Tb 7*C OF TWE 4 uw f.XtSr� FRONT D•o>e. is Mor¢s nNJ Io:o'� SACIG FX6#,Y-f4*S'r WA14. Variations requested: Zt oc,ATFp F¢oNT DooP, WtL &E Zo =o"&k FROM FA9,M-M0ST IJALL NNACE A MAIrtMoM aF ja'-o'ts Auo t4a Ly I p,gapoS60 "Ske A NWIAWA1 Sb SF/6'-o" OE P GovitsD PaUH Is ZEB4419E0. CITY OF ASPEN PRE -APPLICATION CONFERENCE SUMMARY PLANNER: Hillary Seminick, 970.429.2741 DATE: January 21, 2015 PROJECT: 135 Miners Trail Rd REPRESENTATIVE: Kim Weil, Poss Architecture and Planning. 970.925.4755 REQUEST: Land Use Code Interpretation DESCRIPTION: A change order was submitted for building permit (0013.2014.ARBK) that included an architectural feature with a fire and water element. The Zoning Officer determined that the feature was intended to screen the view and would in effect be a fence. Fences along the rear aspect of a building are required to be no more than 6' in height and the feature in question is 7'. Therefore, the applicant requests a formal interpretation of the relevant code sections. The determination was made using Section 26.575.050, Fences and Section 26,104.100, Definitions. Below are links to the Land Use Application form and Land Use Code for your convenience: Land Use App: http://www aspenpitkin com/Portals/0/docs/City/Comdev/Apps%20and°/o2OFees/2013%201and%20use%20a DD%20form.Ddf Land Use Code: httD://www.ast)eniDitkin.com/Departments/Community-DeveiopmenUPlanning-and-Zoning/Title-26-Land-Use Code/ Applicable Land Use Code Section(s) 26.304 Common Development Review Procedures 26.306 Interpretations of Title 26.575.050 Fences 26.104,100 Definitions Review by: Staff for complete application Community Development Director for interpretation Public Hearing: No Neighborhood Outreach: N/A Planning Fees: Planning Deposit — Code Interpretation, Formal Issuance ($81 flat fee) Referral Fees: N/A Total Deposit: $81 To annly. submit the following information (appiv to both options unless otherwise noted): ❑ Completed Land Use Application and signed fee agreement ASLU Interpretations of Title 135 Miners Trail Rd. 2737.073.23.004 ❑ Pre -application Conference Summary (this document). ❑ Applicant's name, address and telephone number in a letter signed by the applicant that states the name, address and telephone number of the representative authorized to act on behalf of the applicant. ❑ Letter requesting the interpretation with supporting graphics and plans, as applicable. ❑ 1 Complete Copy. ❑ Total deposit for review of the application. ❑ A digital copy of the application provided in pdf file format. Disclaimer: The foregoing summary is advisory in nature only and is not binding on the City. The summary is based on current zoning, which is subject to change in the future, and upon factual representations that may or may not be accurate. The summary does not create a legal or vested right. 2 7 ?,� a�3z '200 Permits File Edit Record Navigate Form Reports Format Tab Help ►x 0 ►I • I I] .lo lump 1 I A 0 oo/d 201S A9-t4 Main Custom Fields Routing Status ;Fee Summary , Actions ;Routing History o Permittype Aspen Land Use Penrot # 0010.2015 ASLU c Address 135 MINERS TRL Apt/Suite oC1y ASPEN State CO zjp 81611 X Permit Information — — -- o Master permit1 Routing queue aslul5 Applied 02/09/2015 Project Status 1pending Approved z 0 � AD Description APPLICATION FOR INTERPRETATION LAND USE CODE 81 FLAT FEE Issued Closed/Final 0 Submitted KIMWEIL (lock Running Days F70 Expires 0204l2016 Submitted via Owner Last name SOUK] First name ICHARIF 700 MILAN ST 800 Phone (970) 925-6587 Address HOUSTON TX 77002 Applicant Owner is applicant? ❑ Contractor is applicant? Last name ISOUKI First name JCHA@F 700 MILAN ST 800 Phone (970) 925-6587 Cust 129998 Address HOUSTON TX 77002 Email Lender Last name First name Phone () Address THE. CITY of ASPEN Land Use Application Determination of Completeness Date: February 6, 2015 Dear City of Aspen Land Use Review Applicant, We have received your land use application for an Interpretation of the land use code and reviewed it for completeness. ❑ Your Land Use Application is incomplete: Please submit the following missing submission items so that we may begin reviewing your application. No review hearings will be scheduled until all of the submission contents listed above have been submitted and are to the satisfaction of the City of Aspen Planner reviewing the land use application. Your Land Use Application is complete: f there are not missing items listed above, then your application has been deemed complete. Please submit the following to begin the land use review process. Other submission items may be requested throughout the review process as deemed necessary by the Community Development Department. Please contact me at 429-2759 if you have any questions. Thank You, Cln4nife0h Ian, Deputy Planning Director City of en, Community Development Department For Office Use Only: Qualifying Applications: Mineral Rights Notice Required New PD Yes Now Subdivision, or PD (creating more than 1 additional lot)_ GMQS Allotments Residential Affordable Housing Yes No , Commercial E.P.F. Lodging Angela Scorey From: Hillary Seminick Sent: Friday, February 06, 2015 3:25 PM To: Angela Scorey; Rebecca Wallace Cc: Jennifer Phelan Subject: New ASLU Case Follow Up Flag: FollowUp Flag Status: Flagged Hi Angie/Rebecca — I need a new ASLU case to be opened. It is an interpretation for 135 Miners Trail, Land Use Code Interpretation with an $81 flat fee. The LU case will be assigned to me. Thanks, Hillary Hillary Seminick Planner Technician Community Development Department City of Aspen 130 S. Galena St. Aspen, CO 81611 970-429-2741 www.aspenpitkin.com Notice and Disclaimer: This message is intended only for the individual or entity to which it is addressed and may contain information that is confidential and exempt from disclosure pursuant to applicable law. If you are not the intended recipient, please reply to the sender that you have received the message in error and then delete it. Further, the information or opinions contained in this email are advisory in nature only and are not binding on the City of Aspen. If applicable, the information and opinions contain in the email are based on current zoning, which is subject to change in the future, and upon factual representations that may or may not be accurate. The opinions and information contained herein do not create a legal or vested right or any claim of detrimental reliance. External Media Located Here M-022661 RMMI