The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutLand Use Case.675 S Alps Rd.0011.2015.ASLUCol- 1 M 094~ 0011.2015.ASLU 675 S ALPS ROAD 601- 9 flf, PUD AMENDMENT 2737 182 56001 f - Ip Edia & 7(27~I T 5,4-1 86 U THE CITY OF ASPEN City of Aspen Community Development Department CASE NUMBER 0011.2015.ASLU PARCEL ID NUMBERS 2737 182 56001 PROJECT ADDRESS 675 S Alps Road/MOSES LOT SPIT LOT #2 PLANNER SARA NADOLNY CASE DESCRIPTION PUDAMENDMENT REPRESENTATIVE ALAN RICHMAN DATEOFFINALACTION 3/27/2015 CLOSED BY ROBERT GREGOR ON: 05/21/2015 1 '751 1 % 25600\ 00(| 70,1 9 Att- 41 /./.F.I.:*I-----I--1--lill---------i--ill---- Ble Edit Record Navigate Fgrm Repom Format Iab Help ~ i@@,x,-e431' . J 1 il 0 3 >M d. 11 11 1 > >1 m f~ 1 Jump~ 1 10i O I 6 1 ... - I --: ' ]-i@ Custom Fields IR*ng saus IFee Summary 'Adions I Routing Estory | Permit type E v Aspen Land Use Permit# 00112015.ASLU 5%1 Address 675 S ALPS RD 1 0 Ap#Suite . Â·13Et.4 I 0192 k 91> City ~ASPEN State 15-71 Zip 81611 ~ Permit Information f . : 51-# ..Pri â‚¬7- 33*41 7 * Master permit Routing queue aslu15 Appliec 02/13/2015 i. ..!.-e'i.'31 67: Projed Status pending Apprwed v 0 F Description APPLICATION FOR PUB AMENDMENT Issue< V Closed/Fina , Â»I Ill 4%,i Submitted ALAN RICHMAN 920 1125 Clock ~EI*--| Days E---01 Expires 02/08/2016 Iv -!ffj< : ~ Submitted via :1 ~ Owner Last name ICE JACKSON, LLC First name NEIL KARBANK 604 W MAIN ST | ASPEN CO 81611 Phone (910) 920-2899 Address ':'*-> ~ Applicant Â®Owner is applicant? E Contrador is applicant? Last name ICE JACKSON, LLC - Frst name NEIL KARBANK 604 W MAIN ST ASPEN CO 81611 Phone (970) 920-2899 Cust # 29416 - Address Email Lender : Last name First name , i Phone C )- Address E ----PI 17-~1~ ~A' .Pll_I. ICS (DEIVel' MilliP|,liI10f 1 ,: *4 9 -12 - Â»26 1//7ft.*/ 11: Id./.& .(Ill"/It - .1- .4- C-k * 6 06/53> &73 Fles 6 50, 00 /14- 2 s 'Ffeâ‚¬ 275 08 74 3 7 FG, O N O!nol 1 xoglocill 1 's-dno.,9 q=Â°11 - I wa 5%.A tu. AFFIDAVIT OF PUBLIC NOTICE REQUIRED BY SECTION 26.304.070 AND CHAPTER 26.306 ASPEN LAND USE CODE ADDRESS OF PROPERTY: De-*â‚¬1Â° ff-Or A fprtv,1 Aspen, CO STATE OF COLORADO ) ) SS. County of Pitkin ) (name, please print) being or representing an Applicant to the City of Aspen, Colorado, hereby personally certify that I have complied with the public notice requirements of Section 26.304.060 (E) or Section 26.306.010 (E) of the Aspen Land Use Code in the following manner: t"' publication of notice: By the publication in the legal notice section of an official paper or a paper o f general circulation in the City of Aspen no later than fourteen (14) days after final approval of a site specific development plan. A copy of the publication is attached hereto. Publication ofnotice: By the publication in the legal notice section of an official paper or a paper o f general circulation in the City of Aspen no later than fifteen (15) days after an Interpretation has been rendered. A copy of the publication is attached hereto. An,-4 SeÂ»g Signature The foregoing "Affidavit of Notice" was acknowledged before me this 26 day of Hed--4- , 200_53 by /6,9664 SCO-'~-'-- PUBLIC NOTICE WITNESS MY HAND AND OFFICIAL SEAL Of DEVELOPMENT APPROVAL Notice is hereby given to the general public of the approval of a site-specific development plan, and the creation of a vested property right pursuant to My commission expires: 10130119 the Land Use Code of the City of Aspen and Title 24, Article 68, Colorado Revised Statutes, pertain- ing to the following described property: Parcel ID #273718256001, legally described as the Replat of <723-nie_ L. th lies Lot 2, Moses Lot Split, Section 18, Township 10, Range 84 West of the 6th Principal Meridian, Pit- kin County, Colorado. The applicant, Icie Jackson, Notary Public LLC, was granted 8040 Greentine Exemption and Insubstantial PD Amendment approvals that will permit a graded walkway. underground drainage. BONNIE L. SH ILES and soils nails outside of the building envelope, and a mjnor eniargement of tlle building's tootprInt NOTARY PUBLIC within the building envelope. ATTACHMENTS: The changes are depicted in the land use applica- STATE OF COLORADO tion on file with the City of Aspen. For further in- formation contact Sara Nadolny at the City of As- pen Community Development Dept., 130 S. Galena St., Aspen, Colorado. (970) 429-2739. COPY OF THE PUBLICATION ~~gyYCO~~RRE~X~O3~E/39M, 2017 City of Aspen Published in The Aspen Times on March 26, 2015. (11050644) I A RECF ON#: 618698, 04/02/2015 at 11:15:joAM, 1 OF 9, R $51.00 Doc Code APPROVAL Janice K. Vos Caudill, Pitkin County, CO NOTICE OF APPROVAL For an Insubstantial Amendment to a Planned Development and 8040 Greenline Review Exemption at 675 South Alps Road legally described as the Replat of Lot 2, Moses Lot Split, Section 18, Township 10, Range 84 West of the 6th Principal Meridian, Pitkin County, Colorado Parcel ID No.: 273718256001 APPLICANT: Icie Jackson, LLC 675 South Alps Rd Aspen, CO 81611 SUBJECT & SITE OF AMENDMENT: 675 South Alps Rd Aspen, CO 81611 SUMMARY: The applicant is requesting an insubstantial amendment to the Planned Development and 8040 Greenline Review Exemption to permit the following on the subject site: â€¢ A graded walkway to the front entry/porch of the residence, outside of the building envelope; â€¢ Underground drainage infrastructure that daylights at its southern end, at the east side of the property. outside ofthe building envelope; â€¢ Soil nails at the rear, western edge of the property. outside of the building envelope; and â€¢ A minor enlargement of the building's footprint due to the expansion of the catering kitchen, to remain within the established building envelope. BACKGROUND: The subject site is located in the R-15/PD zone district, and measures 6,113.70 sq. it. In 2013 the applicant received approval from the Planning and Zoning Commission via Resolution No. 5 for 8040 Greenline Review to amend the existing building envelope to contain all of the built structure as well as the proposed improvements, Residential Design approval was also granted with this Resolution. Planning and Zoning Commission recommended approval to City Council for a PUD Amendment to amend the sizes of lots 1 and 2 of the Moses Lot Split, designating Lot 2 as 54,762 sq. ft. with a floor area allowance of 5,800 sq. ft. City Council approved the PUD Amendment. as indicated above, to amend the lot sizes and increase the floor area through Ordinance No. 11, Series of 2013. CURRENT PROPOSAL: The addition to the structure as approved in 2013 has not been constructed. The current proposal adds the following improvements to the project: 1 â€¢ A graded walkway which extends outside of the building envelope. The proposed walkway will extend from the gated driveway area and will wrap around to the covered entry porch area; â€¢ Onsite drainage that will extend from the rear of the structure, passing beyond the building envelope, to the eastern property line; â€¢ A soil nail retention wall at the western rear side of the structure that will extend beyond the building envelope, to the western property boundary; and â€¢ A minor increase of 170 sq. ft. to the structure due to an increase in size of the catering kitchen at the rear of the building. The 2013 P&Z approval depicts the kitchen at 185 sq. ft. The proposed remodel increases the kitchen size to 335.66 sq. ft. This expansion will create a minor change to the footprint of the building. All proposed items are highlighted in Exhibit A to this memo. REVIEW PROCEDURE: â€¢ Insubstantial Amendments (to a Planned Development approval). An insubstantial amendment to an approved Project Review or an approved Detailed Review may be approved, approved with conditions or denied by the Community Development Director based on the criteria found in Section 26.445.100 of the Land Use Code, and included as Exhibit B to this memo. â€¢ 8040 Greenline Review Exemption. The Community Development Director may exempt the expansion, remodeling or reconstruction of an existing 8040 Greenline development based on the criteria found in Section 26.435.030.B of the Land Use Code, and included as Exhibit B to this memo. STAFF EVALUATION: Staff has reviewed this application against the criteria for an Insubstantial PD Amendment and 8040 Greenline Review Exemption, and notes the following. A) Insubstantial PD Amendment. The soil nails, walkway, and drainage infrastructure that are proposed outside of the building envelope will not change the character or use of the development. These proposed changes do vary from the original approval, but are found to be insubstantial in nature. The request does not require any variation from the project's allowed use or height, and is within the tolerance of the approved floor area for the site. Staff finds the criterion for an Insubstantial PD Amendment to be met. B) 8040 Greenline Review Exemption. The addition of soil nails, drainage infrastructure, and the proposed walkway will not add floor area to the existing structure, nor will these changes increase the total amount of square footage to exempt areas of the structure. Staff finds this portion of the review to be met. 2 Minor increases have been proposed to the footprint of the existing residence. The table below outlines the existing and proposed floor area for the property. Floor Area of Deck Floor Area Total Floor Area Over/Under Structure Beyond 15% Allowable Floor Exemption* Area (5,800 sq. ft.) Existing Floor Area 4,313.14 sq. ft. 1800.56 sq. ft. 6,113.70 sq. ft. Over on S ite Proposed Floor Area 5,260.04 sq. ft. 0 5,260.04 sq. ft. Under for Site (per Permit # 0011.2015.ASLU) Increase in Floor 170 sq. ft. 0 5,430.04 sq. ft. Under Area per this Exemption * Decks, balconies, loggias, gazebos, trellises, exterior stairways, and non-street-facing porches are not counted towards floor area until these features exceed a combined total of 15% of the allowable floor area for the site, per 26.575.020.D.4 of the Land Use Code. This equates to 870 sq. ft. exempt for a floor area of 5,800 sq. ft. The current redevelopment plan decreases the floor area of the existing structure, bringing it into compliance with the approved maximum tloor area for the site, and therefore allows for these minor changes. The residence will remain within the designated building envelope. The development does not require any additional tree removal. Furthermore, Parks Department has reviewed the application and finds the soil nails to be at a depth where they will not interfere with the roots of any trees on the site. Parks has indicated that the soil nails may not extend any further than proposed, which is up to the western property line. The Engineering Dept. has reviewed the drainage plan for the site and has indicated that the proposed drainage infrastructure is in an appropriate location for the site. The three drywells already located outside of the building envelope are adequate for the site's needs. Engineering has also indicated the soil nails are an appropriate use for retention and are not expected to cause erosion or sedimentation issues on the site. Staff finds all required criteria to be met. DECISION: The Community Development Director finds the application for an Insubstantial Amendment to a Planned Development and 8040 Greenline Exemption, as noted above, to be consistent with the review criteria (Exhibit B) and thereby, APPROVES the request, with the following condition: â€¢ The applicant will confirm all floor area calculations prior to the issuance of a building permit. APPR VED BY (Bio-9 5 ~Chril Bendo~mmunity Development Direclpr Date / 3 Attachments: Exhibit A: Site Plan (Recorded) Exhibit B: Review Criteria/Staff Findings (In file) Exhibit C: Application (In file) 4 DEVELOPMENT ORDER ofthe City of Aspen Community Development Department This Development Order, hereinafter "Order", is hereby issued pursuant to Section 26.304.070, "Development Orders", and Section 26.308.010, "Vested Property Rights", of the City of Aspen Municipal Code. This Order allows development of a site specific development plan pursuant to the provisions of the land use approvals, described herein. The effective date of this Order shall also be the initiation date of a three-year vested property right. The vested property right shall expire on the day after the third anniversary of the effective date of this Order, unless a building permit application submittal is accepted and deemed complete by the Chief Building Official, pursuant to Section 26.304.075, or unless an exemption, extension, reinstatement, or a revocation is issued by City Council pursuant to Section 26.308.010. After Expiration of vested property rights, this Order shall remain in full force and effect, excluding any growth management allotments granted pursuant to Section 26.470, but shall be subject to any amendments to the Land Use Code adopted since the effective date of this Order. This Development Order is associated with the property noted below for the site specific development plan as described below. Icie Jackson, LLC, 675 South Alps Rd, Aspen CO 81611 Property Owner's Name, Mailing Address Replat of Lot 2, Moses Lot Split, Section 18, Township 10, Range 84 West of the 6th Principal Meridian, Pitkin County, Colorado; commonly known as 675 S. Alps Rd. Aspen CO 81611 Legal Description and Street Address of Subject Property The applicant has received administrative approval for an Insubstantial Amendment to the Planned Development and 8040 Greenline Review Exemption allowing a graded walkway, drainage, and soil nails to be located outside of the building envelope. The applicant has also received approval to expand the catering kitchen at the rear of the property, which will also expand the building's footprint. This approved change will remain within the building's footprint, and under the allowable floor area for the property. Written Descriplion of the Site Specific Plan and/or Attachment Describing Plan Administrative approval for Insubstantial PD Amendment and 8040 Greenline Review Exemption granted on March 27,2015. Land Use Approvalfs) Received and Dates (Attach Final Ordinances or Resolutions) April 2,2015 Effective Date of Development Order (Same as date of publication of notice of approval) April 3,2018 Expiration Date of Development Order (The extension, reinstatement, exemption.from expiration and revocation may be pursued in accordance with Section 26.308.010 of the City of Aspen Municipal Code.) Issued this 27th day of March, 2015, by the City of Aspen Community Development Director. 414Â»4~---- 112- 10 Cfris Mendorh Community DevelÂ®ment 0irector L.//1 Exhibit A: Site Plan 1 ' \ 1 / 20751 / 1 ./ i / 8075 \ 1 Z 8075.1 # \ 80.0 ty x / 0000041 //' i Lot 2 1 X S 1 - I \ 4 + 1 . 1 . Lot 1 \ 1 E / \ %-7 1. ifi - ,/' wa Ikway -4-5-19-rn; 1 \ \ -< .kH' 2437-04 \ 5 \ 1/ 8081 /\\ 1 , \ \ 8085 t. + O\ / \\ 1 // .h %.4*AIMI- A S t. 1 Â¥ 2 I \ / 0 \ 04 1 - r >//i \ \I 1 0 9027-" 1 1 8.9-11 ~ \111/-X F 8090 i .., 9095 \// 9, //% I & m 090698Â£s 8100 \ / \ V.N. .... i 4-3 :0. / / , //4 . 1631-- i / \ I , P- - j 4. 11' 1 8080 . A K.- - ---- t...e... \ -/ '.1 \ \ 42/ 9/4 C oll 4 \ G' e# 1 .- â‚¬ -9:'' * 'f \ f\\11 - 43-, r[ 1 1 It \ \\ \\ \\ \\ \\ , ,,6 N / ~ i J J soil nails , '\~ '#, i, \ . i \\ \ - 1 1 1 I 1 1 1 11 1 1 1 1 11 % 1 1 1 %00 %* X. m.0 -------- ~ 91.En 101, AÂ·<CHITEC-URAL SI-E PLAN ~ f Exhibit B Review Criteria A - 8040 Greenline Exemption. The Community Development Director may exempt the expansion, remodeling or reconstruction of an existing 8040 Greenline development if the following standards are met: 1. The development does not add more than ten percent (10%) to the floor area of the existing structure or increase the total amount of square footage of areas of the structure which are exempt from floor area calculations by more than twenty-five percent (25%); and Staff Response: The addition of soil nails and drainage infrastructure will not add floor area to the existing structure, nor will this increase the total amount of square footage to exempt areas of the structure. The kitchen at the western edge of the building has been proposed to increase from 185 sq. ft. to 335.66 sq. ft. As part of this proposed remodeltheexteriorwall will be bumped out in this location, and the footprint of the building increased. This increase will be fully contained within the established building envelope. The structure will remain under the allowable 5,800 sq. ft. that was designated by P&Z Resolution No. 5, Series 2013, with the current proposed plans measuring at 5,430.04 sq. ft. The existing floor area measures 6,113.70 sq. ft., and is therefore over the 5,800 sq. ft. approved for the site. The proposed plan will decrease the floor area of the structure, bringing it into compliance for the site. No increase is proposed for the areas that are exempt from floor area calculations. Staffjinds this criterion to be met. 2. The development does not require the removal of any tree for which a permit would be required pursuant to Section 15.04.450 or the applicant receives a permit pursuant to said Section; and Staff Response: The proposed soil nails, drainage and walkway do not require any additional tree removal. Stafffinds this criterion to be met. 3. The development is located such that it is not affected by any geologic hazard and will not result in increased erosion and sedimentation. Staff Response: The parcel is subject to 8040 Greentine Review, which was formerly approved via Resolution No. 5, Series of 2013. The Engineering and Parks Departments have reviewed the proposed plans for additional soil nails, drainage and walkway outside of the approved building envelope has been found to cause no foreseeable increased erosion or sedimentation to the site. Stafffinds this criterion to be met. 1 4. All exemptions are cumulative. Once a development reaches the totals specified in Subsection 26.435.030.B. 1, an 8040 Greenline review must be obtained pursuant to Subsection 26.435.030.C. Staff Response: This is the Jirst 8040 Greenline exemption that has been requested for this parcel. Staffjinds this criterion to be met. B - Insubstantial PD Amendment. An insubstantial amendment to an approved Project Review of an approved Detailed Review may be authorized by the Community Developrnent Director. An insubstantial amendment shall meet the following criteria: 1. The request does not change the use or character of the development. Staff Response: The soil nails, walkway, and drainage infrastructure that are proposed for outside of the building envelope will not change the character or use of the development. The increase in the structure's footprint will also not change the use or character of the development, which will remain as a single family residence. Staff jinds this criterion to be met. 2. The request is consistent with the conditions and representations in the project's original approval, or otherwise represents an insubstantial change. Staff Response: This application includes the request for soil nails, drainage, and a walkway outside of the building envelope, as well as a minor increase to the structure's footprint. These proposed changes were not represented in the initial approval for the remodel of this parcel. The soil nails and drainage are underground and will not be visible. Engineering has reviewed the drtinage and found it to be placed where it needs to be for this development. Likewise, Engineering and Parks have reviewed the proposed soil nails and found these to be unobtrusive on the property, and have given their approval so long as they are not extended anyfurther than shown on Exhibit A. According to Section 26.575.110 of the Code, approved walkways may occur outside of a building envelope. The proposed walkway will require approximately 2' of grading. The increase to the catering kitchen is proposed at the rear of the structure and will expand the building'~ footprint. The expansion will remain within the established building envelope. The proposed floor area increase will remain within the 5,800 sq. ft. allowed for this property. Staff Jinds al! proposed changes to be insubstantiai in nature in relation to the 2013 approval, and finds this criterion to be met. 3. The request does not require granting a variation from the project's allowed usel s) and does not request an increase in the allowed height or floor area. Staff Response: The request does not require a variation from the project's allowed use or height. The increase in Jloor area is within the tolerance of approved jloor area for the site. Sta#Jinds this criterion to be met. 2 . 4. Any proposed changes to the approved dimensional requirements are limited to technical nature, respond to a design parameter that could not have been foreseen during the Project Review approval, are within dimensional tolerances stated in the Project Review, or otherwise represent an insubstantial change. Staff Response: This proposal includes an increase to the footprint of the building. However, the footprint will remain within the approved envelope and is within the approved floor area for the site. No other dimensional variations are being requested as part of this application. Staff,finds this criterion to be met. 5. An applicant may not apply for Detailed Review if an amendment is pending. Staff Response: The Applicant is not applying for any Detailed Reviews in conjunction with this application. Stafffinds this criterion to be met. 3 ... ALAN RICHMAN PLANNING SERVICES, INC. P.O. BOX 3613 ASPEN, COLORADO 81612 Pr.$,14/Fy 970-920-1125 FEB 1 0 2015 CITY OF ASPEN COMMUNITY DFVFI OPME.K February 9, 2015 Ms. Jennifer Phelan, Deputy Director City of Aspen Community Development Department 130 South Galena Street Aspen, Colorado 81611 RE: INSUBSTANTIAL AMENDMENT/8040 GREENLINE REVIEW EXEMPTION FOR 675 SOUTH ALPS ROAD Dear Jennifer, This is an application requesting an insubstantial amendment to the approved PUD Plan and an exemption from 8040 Greenline Review for Lot 2 of the Moses Lot Split (Parcel ID# 273718256001). The Moses Lot Split is located near the top of Aspen Alps South Road, across from the Aspen Alps 700 Building. (see the attached vicinity map). Lot 2 is owned by Icie Jackson LLC. Proof of the ownership of the property is provided via a title insurance policy issued for the property (see Exhibit #1). The owner (hereinafter, "the applicant") has designated Alan Richman Planning Services as its representative for this application. The letter of authorization is attached hereto as Exhibit #2. The applicant obtained PUD/Subdivision Amendment and 8040 Greenline Review approval for the property pursuant to Ordinance No. 11, Series of 2013 and P&Z Resolution No. 5, Series of 2013 (attached as Exhibits #3 and #4, respectively). These approvals authorized several minor additions to be made to the existing residence on the property and .9Mablished.a building- enyelppe wjthin Y#Â®hâ€žsuch actixity was peonitted to_ 0-cqu r. Towards the end of 2014, the applicant submitted a building permit application to make these additions and to remodel significant portions of the residence. In order to construct the-remodel and additions, the applicant needs to install soil nails below grade that would extend beyond the boundaries of the approved envelope: 4 The City's Zoning Officer has flagged this activity and asked that the approvals be amended to authorize this work to occur. Therefore, the applicant is submitting this application to obtain said amendment. . Ms. Jennifer Phelan February 9, 2015 Page Two I discussed this situation with you and you issued a pre-application summary, attached as Exhibit #5. This document lists the following land use approvals that must be obtained by the applicant: Sec. 26.435.030 B 8040 Greenline Review Exemption; and Sec. 26.445.110 A Insubstantial PD Amendments. Following below are the applicant's responses to the standards of these sections of the Aspen Land Use Code. 8040 Greenline Exemption Since Lot 2 is located at an elevation of approximately 8,080' above mean sea level, staff has confirmed that the proposed development is subject to 8040 Greenline Review. Section 26.435.030 of the Aspen Land Use Code establishes the procedures and standards for 8040 Greenline Review. Sub-section B provides an exemption from 8040 Greenline Review for certain types of minor projects. This proposal qualifies for this exemption based on the following responses to the four standards of this sub-section: 1. The development does not add more than ten (10) percent to the floor area of the existing structure or increase the total amount of square footage of areas of the structure which are exempt from floor area calculations by more than twenty-five (25) percent. Response: No additional floor area is proposed by this exemption application. 2. The development does not require the removal of any tree for which a permit would be required pursuant to Section 15.040.450 or the applicant receives a permit pursuant to said Section. Response: No trees will be removed by the proposed development. During the pre- application conference you expressed a concern that the soil nails might have an impact on trees above the designated envelope. To address this concern, we had our landscape specialist, Julie Hoffner of Elite Land Design, LLC go to the site and review the soil nail drawings to evaluate this issue. She has submitted a letter for your consideration, attached as Exhibit #6. It contains the following statement: "In looking at the planned soil nailing and the existing trees, I do not see any conflict to the root systems. The soil nailing will be anywhere from 8' to 18' below any existing trees and therefore will not impact any root systems. Furthermore, the existing retaining wall below the trees will not be changed or impacted during this process, resulting in no soil movement within the vicinity of the trees." Ms. Jennifer Phelan February 9, 2015 Page Three The design team is available to discuss this issue further and to review it on-site with the Parks Department should that prove to be necessary. 3. The development is located such that it is not affected by any geologic hazard and will not result in increased erosion and sedimentation. Response: The purpose of the application is to ensure that the remodeled residence will not be subject to unstable slopes or other geologic hazards by appropriately stabilizing the cut slopes. There is an existing sub-grade soil nail wall in place that stabilignalba..a!22Â£ above the residence today. This soil nail wall will be demolished, from the top down, in four to five foot lifts. Ihe-[eillagement soil nail wall will be built ill.tb-4.Â§â€žame-fg-tito fiveTEE -33.313nstallingâ„¢the.ymili@Ee rginforcement (shotgete and rebar) followed by the soil nlil â„¢... installation, This prQCBSS-is_[epeateÂ® until the bottom of the wall is reached. Using this construction method ensures that the sT@pe WM"remain stable becauseatno-time will the majority of the slope be unsupported. Furthermore, there will be no erosion or sedimentation from this work since the work is a sub-grade development activity. 4. All exemptions are cumulative. Once a development reaches the totals specified in Section 26.435.030 (B) (1) an 8040 Greenline Review must be obtained pursuant to Section 26.435.030 (C). Response: The applicant acknowledges the cumulative nature of the floor area exemption. As noted above, the subject exemption is not requesting additional floor area. Insubstantial PD Amendment The PUD plan for the property, which is recorded in Plat Book 104 at Page 80 of the Pitkin County records, designates a building envelope for Lot 2. The proposed soil nails would extend beyond the designated envelope, necessitating this amendment. The applicant requests that rather than amending the depicted boundaries of the envelope, the City simply authorize this sub-grade activity, which will not be visible above grade, to occur. The proposal qualifies for an insubstantial amendment based on the following responses to the five standards of this sub-section: 1 The request does not change the use or character of the development. Response: No change to the character of the property or use will occur. The development that would be authorized by this amendment would occur subgrade and be entirely in support of the approved residence. 2. The request is consistent with the conditions and representations in the project's original approval, or otherwise represents an insubstantial change. Ms. Jennifer Phelan February 9, 2015 Page Four Response: The request is an insubstantial change that is consistent with the project's original approval. ~_As the project haiproceeded_through the_design process itbecame Degati~ly to include a subgrade mechanical room within the house. _Ihis added feature: which will be invisiole above grade,_hgs ca/sed tile need to mqdifYâ€žth-9.fxisting soil nail *Â©Race&4jiwh9Â·Â·ibil@jileÂ®*i 3. The request does not require granting a variation from the project's allowed use(s) and does not request an increase in the allowed height or floor area. Response: A variation in use is not proposed, nor is an increase in allowed height or floor area being requested. 4. Any proposed changes to the approved dimensional requirements are limited to a technical nature, respond to a design parameter that could not have been foreseen during the Project Review approval, are within dimensional tolerances stated in the Project Review, or otherwise represent an insubstantial change. Response: No changes to approved dimensional requirements are proposed. All planned work would be subgrade and within the property boundaries. 5. An applicant may not apply for Detailed Review if an amendment is pending. Response: Not applicable Conclusion Based on the above responses the applicant hereby requests that the Community Development Director exempt these proposed activities from 8040 Greenline Review and approve an Insubstantial PD amendment so the applicant can proceed towards construction this spring. We believe that these responses and the attached materials provide all of the information required by staff to process this application. However, if there is anything else I can provide to you or any other questions I can answer please do not hesitate to contact me. Sincerely, ALA~ RICHMAN PLANNING SERVICES, INC. tu Alan Richman, AICP EXHIBITS . \\\ W \ 1 1, --/ tx 1 2 6,5 . $ 1 ~ MB but ' q \ \\',Â·\\1\ U , 1/ f /r f,A i i .11#47 1\ 0 \R#(b~. / , I Ill . 1----4 *&Â· 1 11Â«- -- 1 \ / 1.1 4, /~ irc#f.'- < 1 / I - I ----* j W ' '/''~Il ..\\ ..0\\):\\ j 11 '1111111. 11 .74,4 1 --- 2 / // -4 . -/--6 4"frux*:C~VI \ '1 ' ') % 0 ----- 1. E.116(./,thiti.< Al ' r -11'4*%Â·11* / i-Â«Â« 2 ~WI~il f 1~ -1)?1.1~1~(1 /1 \ ; "*648 1 \ ,, 111 - . 111,1.*71 1 f "I, 1 I E j) 4,9.-% 1 I *11 1 h - \~ 1 - t.,4 24:,Myk,1.. L'Al'44 - i *14+FIN~. 00Â«\\\-~ I -1 ///-3 1 -1 * 4 ')4/ ' / I 1-19:, .*.,2,-:. i â€¢ f f 3*g , ckll/V / 94 - \ 0 / \ / / M /7 ,Â«>.94-fÂ¥'.. r... . I , 1. . I I , . . A., 1 - 1 1..2 -.1 â€¢ 1 J Â· . I.jo ~1\\\ \% \1\ 'i \11!1 . CD % 10 - e:4 ?f,,3. , r 49;2 +U' 2-1 k. :2 .'Â«/ + , \'ou .1 8210 , "*P:'Â©.â€¢ 1.-Â·' Â· 1 + 1 or. '' 1, 111114.11.*J t / \ U. 1 4-/1 11 4 < 1 z Il''f \4 . / I 1 A - 4, 1,111 -1 1 1 . 4//' ., 1 1 1 1 44 -- t tr.. //// 1% \ ..4 , I ..... 11,\ d' f ttjl: L -1 w' f k 4 f- a~- \ lk' - ./ 4.1 1 '. . / LOT) 1 Â·Al' . 3 - ' ##'rlittiv-,1 .. ..1-'. // 1 11,~ E 1 L \-,4 ~~ 1\4 \\1 1 /1 -4 / \ f' ir Lt ~--73 -- ~ -.,1 - / I - - *664*48' 1 1 1 - .- ... 1.3. R. -- -44* .7.9. /,Â·,/2-1â€¢/.6':. 1 . Â·d - h ... Kh. I \ 42"..... . 2 /18*57 Â·U.UghREÂ¥5/ --* ~ , // P /&2; E"'- A 2 ; /.4 / arM -0, 4 ' - - I. 'lle\. - \ / ' / \Jr44Â¥*' i i l h. Â· 227(74- , .~f./ \ - 9 1 1 \\ 4 2-- -r-r ~Â· 8120- fk~J.Jiz~~-&*r. ~-2-1236Â·.~Â·-- -'4:r-:117---.2-. SE,90.If MOSES LOT SPLIT VICINITY MAP ~ N U- . 1Â«12Â»924*29Â«42â‚¬77=m>o--. - - Â· ~-y.v> - W -Â·44~ E -8150Â«1. ~31- Feet --. b=99:'. 2 S pl#. A--ZL.t W \\.h ~.~ of the features depicted andsnotalegal - - 79.. 1 62-11 This map/drawing/image is a graphical representation ---1- .Â·.2-Â·314 2- - -1- ;04*%/-h Â»1~~-Kbi~- representation. The accuracy may change depending on the enlargement or reduction Copyright 2012 Aspen/Pitkin GIS Tue Apr 17. 2012 C.\GIS\temp\Apnt 12 J.loseslorS/Â·11 -. 1 1 1 1 ~ j,S,3*S* 13*** 060~ -\ 1 - EXHIBIT #1 AMERICAN American Land Title Association Owner's Policy Attorneys LAND T]TLE (6-17-06) Title Guaranty A.00,110.4 Fund, Inc. OWNER'S POLICY NO. OP201105004319 SCHEDULE A Effective Date : 5/18/2011 at exact time of recording Amount of Insurance: 1. Name of Insured: Icie Jackson LLC, a Colorado limited liability company 2. The estate or interest in the Land that is covered by this policy is: Fee Simple 3. Title is vested in: /%* Icie Jackson LLC, a Colorado limited liability company f 4. The land referred to in this policy is described as follows: Ki See Schedule C attached hereto. For informational purposes only, the property address is: 675 South Alps Road, Aspen, Colorado 81611. Gary A. Wright,/ ~ Authorized Of06& or Agent 2622 Member Number Copyrigh( 2006-2009 American Land Title Association. At! rights reserved. The use of this Form is restricted to ALTA licensees and ALTA members in good standing as of lie date of use. All other uses are prohibited. Reprinted under license from the American Land Title Asociation. .* Elittilitilll//111 i 11/ T.171"ni/Â¥111-~1/OM"ki U' , . SCHEDULE B Exceptions from Coverage This policy does not insure against loss or damage, and the Company will not pay costs, attorneys' fees or expenses that arise by reason of: 1. Rights or claims of parties in possession not shown by the public records. 2. Easements, or claims of easements, not shown by the public records. 3. Discrepancies, conflicts in boundary lines, shortage in area, encroachments, and any facts which a correct survey and inspection of the premises would disclose<and which are not shown by the public records. / 4. Any lien, or right to a lien, for services, labor or material heretofore or hereafter furnished, imposed by law and not shown by the public records. 5. Unpatented mining claims; reservations or exceptions in patents or in Acts authorizing the issuance thereof; water rights, claims or title to water. 6. Taxes for 2011, not yet due or payable. 7. Reservations and exceptions as contained in United States Patent dated April 22, 1896, and recorded May 20, 1949, in Book 175 at Page 213, as Reception No. 096377 as follows: "That the premises hereby granted, with the exception of the surface may be entered by the proprietor of any other vein or ledge, the top or apex of which lies outside the boundary, should the same in its dip be found to penetrate, intersect or extend into said premises, for the purpose of extracting and removing the ore from such other vein, lode or ledge." 8. Right of the proprietor of a vein or lode to extract and remove his ore therefrom, should the same be found to penetrate or intersect the premises hereby granted, and right of way thereon for ditches and canals as constructed by the authority of the United States as reserved in United States Patents dated July 3, 1911, and recorded August 26, 1949, in Book 175 at Page 299, as Reception No. 096828, and dated November 4, 1899, and recorded August 26, 1949, in Book 175 at Page 299, as Reception No. 096829. 9. Reservation of all the minerals, mineral deposits, mineral oils and natural gases of every kind and nature, together with the right of ingress and egress for the purpose of mining, drilling, and exploring said lands for minerals as reserved in the Quit Claim Deed dated April 13, 1961, and recorded April 28, 1961, in Book 193 at Page 595, as Reception No. 111295. 10, Terms, conditions, provisions, agreements and obligations specified under the Easement by and between the Board of County Commissioners for Pitkin County, Colorado and George P. Mitchell and HA Bornefeld, Jr., dated December 9, 1965, and recorded December 20, 1965, in Book 217 at Page 593, as Reception No. 122970, and recorded August 1, 1968, in Book 235 at Page 722, as Reception No. 131762. 11, An easement for ingress and egress, city water lines and sewer line as reserved in the Special Warranty Deed dated June 18, 1973, and recorded July 2, 1974, in Book 288 at Page 899, as Reception No. 168549. 12. Grant of Easement as specified in the Special Warranty Deed dated May 16, 1977, and recorded June 24, 1977, in Book 330 at Page 946, as Reception No. 195389, and Agreement of Amendment Concerning that Certain Grant of Easement Recorded in Book 330 at Page 946, Pitkin County Colorado, dated December 26, 1986, and recorded January 27, 1987, in Book 528 at Page 684, as Reception No. 285628, and Second Agreement of Amendment Concerning that Certain Grant of Easement Recorded in Book 300 at Page 946, Pitkin County, Colorado, dated July 9, 1987, and recorded August 27, 1987, in Book 544 at Page 652, as Reception No. 292313. 13. Terms, conditions, provisions, agreements and obligations specified under the Easement Agreement by and between George P. Mitchell and Cynthia Mitchell, HA Bornefeld, Jr., and Mary Bornefeld and Aspen Chance, Inc., a Texas corporation and The Aspen Alps Condominium Copyright 2006-2009 American Land Title Association. All rights reserved. The use of this Form is restricted to ALTA licensees and ALTA members in good standing as of the date of use. All olher uses are prohibited. Reprinted under license from the American Land Title Association. /**11***t .... .........4.13.*.*a I ' - Association dated July 23, 1984, and recorded July 27, 1984, in Book 470 at Page 780, as Reception No. 261361. 14. Terms, conditions, provisions, agreements and obligations specified under the Statement of Exception for the Full Subdivision Process for the Purpose of Subdividing the Moses Property, City of Aspen, Colorado dated April 23, 1987, and recorded June 26, 1987, in Book 540 at Page 186, as Reception No. 290476, 15. Terms, conditions, provisions, agreements and obligations specified under the Restated Easement Agreement by and between George P. Mitchell and H.A. Bornefeld, Jr., Gaard Hopkins Moses and Mary Lynn Patton, Aspen Alps Condominium Association, a Colorado non-profit corporation and Moses Aspen View Homesite, Inc., a Colorado corporation, dated September 3, 1992, and recorded September 3, 1992, as Reception No. 348321. 16, Terms, conditions, provisions, agreements and obligations specified under the Subdivision Agreement for the Replat of Lot 2, Moses Lot Split (A Lot Line Adjustment) and The George P. Mitchell and HA Bornefeld, Jr, Property by and between Moses Aspen View Homesite, Inc., a Colorado corporation and George P. Mitchell and H.A. Bornefeld, Jr., and The City of Aspen, dated August 25, 1992, and recorded September 3, 1992, in Book 687 at Page 895, as Reception No. 348316. 17. Terms, conditions, provisions, agreements and obligations specified under An Ordinance of the . , Aspen City Council Granting Subdivision for Lot 2 of the Moses Lot Split, A Lot Line Adjustment Between the Mitchell Parcel and the Mitchell / Bornfeld Parcel, and Vested Rights for 8040 Greenline Review, Subdivision, and the Lot Line Adjustment All Located on Aspen Alps South Road, City and Townsite of Aspen, (Ordinance No. 31 - Series of 1992) dated June 8, 1992, and recorded September 3, 1992, in Book 687 at Page 901, as Reception No. 348316, and recorded December 18,1992, in Book 698 at Page 141, as Reception No. 352013. 18, Terms, conditions, provisions, agreements and obligations specified under the Shared Sewer Service Line Agreement by and between Aspen Alps Condominium Association, Inc., a Colorado non-profit corporation and Moses Aspen View Homesite, Inc., a Colorado corporation dated September 4, 1992, and recorded January 15, 1993, in Book 700 at Page 676, as Reception No. 352949. 19. Terms, conditions, provisions, agreements and obligations specified under the License Agreement by and between George P. Mitchell and Cynthia W. Mitchell and the Moses Aspen View Homesite, Inc., a Colorado corporation dated September 4, 1992, and recorded January 19, 1993, in Book 701 at Page 40, as Reception No. 353059. 20. Any and all notes, easements and recitals as disclosed on the recorded Moses Lot Split Plat recorded June 26, 1987, in Plat Book 19 at Page 83, as Reception No. 290474, and the Replat of Lot 2, Moses Lot Split (A Lot Line Adjustment) and Final Subdivision Plat of the George P. Mitchell and HA Bornefeld Jr. Property Plat recorded September 9, 1992, in Plat Book 29 at Page 65, as Reception No. 348317, and the Lot 2, Moses Lot Split 2nd Amendment, City of Aspen, Pitkin County, Colorado Plat recorded July 14, 2005, in Plat Book 80 at Page 5, as Reception No. 526459. 21. Terms, conditions, provisions, agreements and obligations specified under the Skier Access License Agreement dated May 31, 2005, and recorded June 20,2005, as Reception No. 511438. 22. Terms, conditions, provisions, agreements and obligations specified under A Resolution of the - City of Aspen Planning and Zoning Commission Approving an 8040 Greenline Review for a Single-Family Residence on Lot 2, Moses Lot Split, City of Aspen, Pitkin County, Colorado (Resolution No. 017 - Series of 2006) dated May 16, 2006, and recorded June 16, 2006, as Reception No. 525351. 23. Terms, conditions, provisions, agreements and obligations specified under the Easement Agreement dated August 6,2007, and recorded August 7,2007, as Reception No. 540749. L' SCHEDULE C File #: PC11002837 Lot 2, as shown on the Replat of Moses Lot Split (A Lot Line Adjustment) and Final Subdivision of the George P. Mitchell and HA Bornefeld, Jr. Property according to the Plat thereof recorded September 3, 1992 in Plat Book 29 at Page 65 as Reception No. 348317 and the Lot 2, Moses Lot Split 2nd Amendment recorded July 14, 2006 in - Plat Book 80 at Page 5 as Reception No. 526459. Excepting any portion thereof lying within Lot 1, Moses Lot Split as shown on the Plat recorded June 26, 1987 in Plat Book 19 at Page 83 as Reception No. 290474, Pitkin County, Colorado. e 4 ./ â€¢r EXHIBIT #2 Ms. Jennifer Phelan City of Aspen Community Development Department 130 South Galena Street Aspen, Colorado 81611 RE: LETTER OF AUTHORIZATION FOR LOT 2, MOSES LOT SPLIT Dear Jennifer, Icie Jackson LLC is the owner of Lot 2 of the Moses Lot Split. I am the authorized representative of Icie Jackson LLC. I hereby authorize Alan Richman Planning Services to submit an application for 8040 Greenline Exemption and Insubstantial PD Amendment for planned soil nails for the property. Mr. Richman is authorized to submit the land use application on our behalf and to represent us in meetings with the staff and the applicable decision making bodies. Should you have any need to contact us during the course of your review of this application please do so through Alan Richman Planning Services. Sincerely, Neil Karbank, Authorized Representative 604 West Main Street Aspen, CO 81611 EXHIBIT #3 ORDINANCE NO. 11 (SERIES OF 2013) AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF ASPEN CITY COUNCIL APPROVING A PUD- OTHER AMENDMENT AND SUBDIVISION-OTHER AMENDMENT FOR LOTS 1 AND 2 OF THE MOSES LOT SPLIT SUBDIVISION, COMMONLY DESCRIBED AS 605 AND 675 S. ALPS ROAD, CITY OF ASPEN, PITKIN COUNTY, COLORADO. Parcel IDs: 273718256003 and 273718256001 WHEREAS, the Community Development Department received an application from S. Alps Road LLC and Icie Jackson LLC (Applicant), represented by Alan Richman of Alan Richman Planning Services, requesting approval of an 8040 Greenline review from the Planning and Zoning Commission and approval for PUD-Other Amendment and Subdivision-Other Amendment by the City Council; and, WHEREAS, the Applicant requests 8040 Greenline review to build an addition to the residence located on 675 S. Alps Road, PUD-Other Amendment to amend the individual floor area allowances for Lot 1 and 2 of the Moses Lot Split but not increase the total floor area granted to the two lots, and Subdivision-Other Amendment to adjust the lot lines between the two lots; and, WHEREAS, as part of the application, Applicant offers to extinguish a Historic Transferable Development Right (TDR) on Lot 2; and, WHEREAS, the Aspen Community Development Department reviewed the proposed 8040 Greenline review and PUD-Other Amendment and recommended approval with conditions to the Planning and Zoning Commission; and, / WHEREAS, during a meeting on Februdry 19, 2013 the Planning and Zoning Commission opened a duly noticed public hearing to consider the proposal and approved an 8040 Greenline review as well as a recommendation of approval for PUD-Other Amendment for City Council by a four to zero (4-0) vote, via Resolution No. 5 (Series of 2013); and, WHEREAS, the Aspen Community Development Department reviewed the proposed PUD-Other Amendment and Subdivision-Other Amendment and recommended approval with conditions to the City Council; and, WHEREAS, during a meeting on April 22,2013 the City Council opened a duly noticed public hearing to consider the proposal and approved a PUD-Other Amendment and a Subdivision-Other Amendment by a four to one (4 - 1) vote; and, WHEREAS, the Aspen City Council finds that the development proposal meets or exceeds all the applicable development standards and that the approval of the devflopment proposal, with conditions; and, WHEREAS, the City Council finds that this ordinance furthers and is necessary for the promotion of public health, safety, and welfare. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY OF ASPEN CITY COUNCIL AS FOLLOWS: City Council Ordinance No. 11, Series 2013 Page 1 0 f 5 Section 1: Approvals Pursuant to the procedures and standards set forth in Title 26 of the Aspen Municipal Code, the Aspen City Council hereby approves a PUD - Other Amendment to amend the allocation of the individual Floor Area allowances for Lot 1 and 2 as well as a Subdivision - Other Amendment to amend the size and boundaries of Lot 1 and 2. A. Floor Area and Lot Size. The City Council approves the change in the size of Lots 1 and 2 (as submitted with this application) and approves the amended Floor Area allowance for each lot as noted in the table below. A building envelope has been established for Lot 2. All other applicable dimensional standards shall meet the underlining zone district requirements. Lot 1 Lot 2 Maximum Floor Area 3,000 5,800 Minimum Lot Size 15,072 54,762 B. TDR Extinguishment. As part of the land use application, the Applicant has offered and the City has accepted the extinguishment of one Historic Transferable Development Right (TDR) as part of the PUD Amendment on Lot 2. The TDR shall be extinguished prior to the issuance of a building permit to construct the residential addition approved through this ordinance and Planning and Zoning Commission Resolution No. 5 (Series of 2013) for Lot 2; however, the extinguishment of the TDR shall not increase the maximum allowable floor area of Lot 2. Section 2: Plat and Agreement The Applicant shall record a subdivision/PUD plat that meets the requirements of Land Use Code Section 26.445.070, Recording a Final PUD Development Plan, within 180 days of approval by City Council. A subdivision agreement is not required. The plat shall be recorded prior to the submission of a building permit application. The building envelope for Lot 2 shall be amended to contain the existing footprint of the building, proposed addition, and existing hardscape improvements to the lot such as retaining walls, etc. so that the requirements of Section 26.575.110, Building envelopes, are met. The plat shall include the enlarged trail easement for the Ajax Trail as outlined in the pre- annexation agreement between the City and Applicant. As a result of minor and non-material discrepancies in survey boundaries for the area in and around the property of Applicant, there appears to be overlap between the Applicant's property boundary and the adj acent property boundary of the Aspen Chance Subdivision. The Applicant agrees to accept the the Aspen Chance plat. Thus, the final plat recorded pursuant to this development shall reflect the boundaries set forth in the Aspen Chance plat. A plat note shall reflect the basis of the change. City Council Ordinance No. 11, Series 2013 Page 2 of 5 Section 3: Engineering The Applicant's design shall be compliant with all sections of the City of Aspen Municipal Code, Title 21 and all construction and excavation standards published by the Engineering Department. The Applicant's design shall also be compliant with the Urban Runoff Management Plan, The application shall meet the mitigation requirements of the Mud and Debris Flow Analysis prepared by Tetra Tec, Inc., dated August 29, 2012 and provided in Exhibit D of the staff memo reviewed by the Planning and Zoning Commission dated February 19, 2013. Additionally, Applicant shall meet the terms and conditions o f the Indemnification and Land Use Process Agreement for Lot 2. Section 4: Fire Mitigation All codes adopted by the Aspen Fire Protection District shall be met per building permit. Section 5: Utilities The Applicant shall comply with the City of Aspen Water System Standards, with Title 25, and with the applicable standards of Title 8 (Water Conservation and Plumbing Advisory Code) of the Aspen Municipal Code, as required by the City of Aspen Water Department. Utility placement and design shall meet adopted City of Aspen standards. Section 6: Sanitation District Requirements Service is contingent upon compliance with the District's rules, regulations, and specifications, at the time of construction, which are on file at the District office. All ACSD fees must be paid prior to the issuance of a building permit. Section 7: Exterior Lighting All exterior lighting shall meet the requirements of the City's Outdoor Lighting Code pursuant to Land Use Code Section 26.575.150, Outdoor lighting. Section 8: Impact Fees and School Lands Dedication Fee-in-Lieu The Applicant shall pay all impact fees and the school lands dedication fee-in-lieu assessed at the time of building permit application submittal and paid at building permit issuance. Section 9: Building Permit Application The Applicant, the Applicant's General Contractor, the Architect that produced the construction drawings, and representatives from the Building Department, Community Development Department and any other person deemed necessary by the City shall attend a meeting prior to the submission of any type of Building Permit for the Subject Property. The purpose of the meeting shall be to ensure clarity relative to the submission requirements, the requirements of this Ordinance, timeframes for processing Building Permits, and any other issues raised by any party. The building permit application shall include the following: a. A copy o f this Ordinance and Planning and Zoning Commission Resolution No. 5 (Series of 2013). b, The conditions o f approval printed on the cover page of the building permit set. c. A completed tap permit for service with the Aspen Consolidated Sanitation District. City Council Ordinance No. 11, Series 2013 Page 3 of 5 d. A drainage plan, including an erosion control plan, prepared by a Colorado licensed Civil Engineer, which meets adopted City standards. e. A construction management plan (CMP) pursuant to the Building Department's requirements. f. A fugitive dust control plan to be reviewed and approved by the Environmental Health Department. g. Accessibility and ADA requirements shall be addressed to satisfactorily meet adopted building codes. Section 10: Vested Riehts The development approvals granted pursuant to Planning and Zoning Commission Resolution - - - Number 5, Series of 2013 and herein shall be vested for a period of three (3) years from the date o f issuance of the development order. No later than fourteen (14) days following the final approval of atl requisite reviews necessary to obtain a development order as set forth in this ordinance, the City Clerk shall cause to be published in a newspaper of general circulation within the jurisdictional boundaries of the City of Aspen, a notice advising the general public of the approval of a site specific development plan and creation o f a vested property right pursuant to this Title. Such notice shall be substantially in the following form: Notice is hereby given to the general public of the approval of a vested property right, pursuant to the Land Use Code of the City of Aspen and Title 24, Article 68, Colorado Revised Statutes, pertaining to the following described property: Lots 1 and 2 of the Moses Lot Split Subdivision and commonly known as 605 and 675 S. Alps Road, City of Aspen, CO, by Ordinance No. 11, Series of 2013, of the Aspen City Council. Section 11: All material representations and commitments made by the Applicant pursuant to the development proposal approvals as herein awarded, whether in public hearing or documentation presented before the Planning and Zoning Commission, are hereby incorporated in such plan development approvals and the same shall be complied with as if fully set forth herein, unless amended by an authorized entity. Section 12: This resolution shall not effect any existing litigation and shall not operate as:an abatement of any action or proceeding now pending under or by virtue of the ordinances repealed or amended as herein provided, and the same shall be conducted and concluded under such prior ordinances. Section 13: If any section, subsection, sentence, clause, phrase, or portion of this resolution is for any reason held invalid or unconstitutional in a court of competent jurisdiction, such pOItion shall be deemed a separate, distinct and independent provision and shall not affect the validity of the remaining portions thereof. City Council Ordinance No. 11, Series 2013 Page 4 0 f 5 The City Clerk is directed, upon the adoption of this ordinance, to record a copy of this ordinance in the office of the Pitkin County Clerk and Recorder. Section 14: A public hearing on this ordinance shall be held on the 22nd day of April, 2013, at a meeting of the Aspen City Council commencing at 5:00 p.m. in the City Council Chambers, Aspen City Hall, Aspen, Colorado, a minimum of fifteen days prior to which hearing a public notice of the same shall be published in a newspaper of general circulation within the City of Aspen. INTRODUCED, READ AND ORDERED PUBLISHED as provided by law, by the City Council ofthe City of Aspen on the 18th day of March, 2013. Attest: fÂ»jiq-6-3 +QU Kathryn S. ~~ch, City Clerk Miclh!61 C. Ireland, Ma3'or FINALLY, adopted, passed and approved this 22nd day of April, 2013. Attest: Kathryn S.~loch, Cify Clerk Michael C. Ireland, Mayor 4-15 49 Approved as to form: ~ /lames R. True, City Attorney i City Council Ordinance No. 11, Series 2013 Page 5 of 5 EXHIBIT #4 RESOLUTION NO. 5 (SERIES OF 2013) A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF ASPEN PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION APPROVING AN 8040 GREENLINE REVIEW AND RECOMMENDING APPROVAL OF A PUD-OTHER AMENDMENT FOR LOTS 1 AND 2 OF THE MOSES LOT SPLIT SUBDIVISION, COMMONLY DESCRIBED AS 605 AND 675 S. ALPS ROAD, CITY OF ASPEN, PITKIN COUNTY, COLORADO. Parcel IDs: 17371 8256003 and 273718256001 WHEREAS, the Community Development Department received an application from S. Alps Road LLC and Icie Jackson LLC (Applicant), represented by Alan Richman of Alan Richman Planning Services, requesting approval of a 8040 Greenline review and a recommendation of approval for PUD-Other Amendment from the Planning and Zoning Commission and also requesting Subdivision - Other Amendment. which is only subject to review by the City Council; and, WHEREAS, the Applicant requests 8040 Greenline review to build an addition to the residence located on 675 S. Alps Road, PUD-Other Amendment to amend the individual floor area allowances for Lot 1 and 2 of the Moses Lot Split but not increase the total floor area granted to the two lots, and Subdivision - Other Amendment to adjust the lot lines between the two lots; and, WHEREAS, as part of the application, Applicant offers to extinguish a Historic Transferable Development Right (TDR) on Lot 2; and, WHEREAS, the Aspen Community Development Department reviewed the proposed 8040 Greenline review and PUD-Other Amendment and recommended approval with conditions; and, WHEREAS, during a meeting on February 19, 2013 the Planning and Zoning Commission opened a duly noticed public hearing to consider the proposal and approved an 8040 Greenline review as well as a recommendation of approval for PED-Other Amendment for City Council by a four to zero (4-0) vote, with the findings and conditions listed hereinafter; and, NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY OF ASPEN PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION AS FOLLOWS: Section 1: Approvals Pursuant to the procedures and standards set forth in Title 26 of the Aspen Municipal Code, the Planning and Zoning Commission hereby approves the 8040 Greenline review to build an addition onto the existing single family residence located on Lot 2 of the Moses Lot Split (675 S. Alps Road) and recommends approval of the PUD -- Other Amendment to amend the allocation ofthe individual Floor Area allowances for Lot 1 and 2. A. 8040 Greenline review. The 8040 Greenline review is approved as represented in Exhibit I of this resolution. The approval is subject to the terms and conditions of the Land Use Code RECEPTION#: 597478, 03/06/2013 at Planning and Zoning Commission 10:09:48 AM, Resolution No. 5, Series 2013 1 OF 7, R $41.00 Doc Code RESOLUTION Page 1 of 4 Janice K. Vos Caudill, Pitkin County, CO unless outlined below. As part of the 8040 Greenline approval, the following conditions shall be met: 1, Building Envelope. The building envelope for Lot 2 shall be amended to contain the existing footprint of the building, proposed addition, and existing hardscape improvements to the lot such as retaining walls, etc. so that the requirements of Section 26.575.110, Building envelopes, are met. The amended envelope shall be depicted on the ls' amended lot line adjustment plat that is to be approved by City Council. 2. Residential Design. Recognizing the existing conditions of the site and residence, the 8040 Greenline approval permits the development of a site specific design that is compatible with the local terrain and mountain character; however, the new additions shall be subject to applicable residential design standards with the exception of secondary mass (section 26,410.040 B.1.). The addition shall replicate the design approved by the Planning Commission and incorporated as Exhibit 1 of this resolution. B. PUI)-Other Amendment. The Commission recommends that the City Council approve the . change in the size of Lots 1 and 2, amend the Floor Area allowance for each lot as noted in the table below, and require the extinguishment of one lÂ·listoric Transferable Development Right as part of the amendment to the PUD. Lot 1 Lot 2 Floor Area 3,00() 5,800 Lot Size 15,072 54,762 Section 2: Engineering Ihe Applicant's design shall be compliant with all sections of the City of Aspen Municipal Code, Title 21 and all construction and excavation standards published by the Engineering Department. The Applicant's design shall also be compliant with the Urban Runoff Management Plan. The application shall meet the mitigation requirements of the Mud and Debris Flow Analysis prepared by Tetra Tec, Inc,, dated August 29,2012 and provided in Exhibit D of the staff memo reviewed by the Planning and Zoning Commission dated February 19, 2013. Section 3: Fire Mitigation All codes adopted by the Aspen Fire Protection District shall be met per building permit. Section 4: Utilities The Applicant shall comply with the City of Aspen Water System Standards, with Title 25, and with the applicable standards of Title 8 (Water Conservation and Plumbing Advisory Code) of the Aspen Municipal Code, as required by the City of Aspen Water Department. Utility placement and design shall meet adopted City of Aspen standards. Planning and Zoning Commission Resolution No. 5, Series 2013 Page 2 0 f 4 Section 5: Sanitation District Requirements Service is contingent upon compliance with the District's rules, regulations, and specifications, at the time of construction, which are on file at the District office. All ACSD fees must be paid prior to the issuance of a building permit. Section 6: Exterior Lighting All exterior lighting shall meet the requirements of the City's Outdoor Lighting Code pursuant to Land Use Code Section 26.575.150, Outdoor lighting. Section 7: Impact Fees and School Lands Dedication Fee-in-Lieu The Applicant shall pay all impact fees and the school lands dedication fee-in-lieu assessed at the time of building permit application submittal and paid at building permit issuance. Section 8: Building Permit Application The Applicant, the Applicant's General Contractor, the Architect that produced the construction drawings, and representatives from the Building Department, Community Development Department and any other person deemed necessary by the City shall attend a meeting prior to the submission of any type of Building Permit for the Subject Property. The purpose of the meeting shall be to ensure clarity relative to the submission requirements, the requirements of this Ordinance, timeframes for processing Building Permits, and any other issues raised by any party. The building permit application shall include the following: a. A copy of the final Ordinance and Planning and Zoning Commission Resolution No. 9 (Series of2012). b. The conditions of approval printed on the cover page of the building permit set. c. A completed tap permit for service with the Aspen Consolidated Sanitation District. d. A drainage plan, including an erosion control plan, prepared by a Colorado licensed Civil Engineer, which meets adopted City standards. e. A construction management plan (CMP) pursuant to the Building Department's requirements. f. A fugitive dust control plan to be reviewed and approved by the Environmental Health Department. g. Accessibility and ADA requirements shall be addressed to satisfactorily meet adopted building codes. Section 9: All material representations and commitments made by the Applicant pursuant to the development proposal approvals as herein awarded, whether in public hearing or documentation presented before the Planning and Zoning Commission, are hereby incorporated in such plan development approvals and the same shall be complied with as if fully set forth herein, unless amended by an authorized entity. Planning and Zoning Commission Resolution No. 5, Series 2013 Page 3 of4 Section 10: This resolution shall not effect any existing litigation and shall not operate as an abatement of any action or proceeding now pending under or by virtue of the ordinalices repealed or amended as herein provided, and the same shall be conducted and concluded under such prior ordinances. Section 11: If any section, subsection, sentence, clause, phrase, or portion of this resolution is for any reason held invalid or unconstitutional in a court of competent jurisdiction, such portion shall be deemed a separate, distinct and independent provision and shall not affect the validity of the remaining portions thereof. APPROVED BY the Planning and Zoning Commission of the City of Aspen on this 19th day of February, 2013. APPROVED AS TO FORM: PLANNING AND ZONING COMMRFS[ON: i - 4 \ t Â· C 4-4-~ - Deb Quilin, Assistant City Attorney Ef,Erspamer, (~)hair \ j ArrEST: 40._ . 1042,-0 . r* i 4Â£ 14 , *ackiZ Gthian, Deputy City Clerk Exhibit 1 - Exterior elevations and site plan Planning and Zoning Commission Resolution No. 5, Series 2013 Page 4 of4 Zzi EXHIBIT #5 CITY OF ASPEN PRE-APPLICATION CONFERENCE SUMMARY PLANNER: Jennifer Phelan- 970.429.2759 DATE: 2.2.15 PROJECT: 675 South Alps Road REPRESENTATIVE: Alan Richman TYPE OF APPLICATION: PD Insubstantial AmendmenU8040 Greenline Exemption DESCRIPTION: The proposal is to allow for soil nailing outside the building envelope that has been designated for lot in order to construct an addition to the existing residence.The envelope was memorialized via the plat recorded at Book 104, Page 80. The Applicant will need to submit a Land Use Application requesting an Insubstantial Amendment to the Planned Development as well as an 8040 Greenline Exemption. Below are links to the Land Use Application form and Land Use Code for your convenience. Land Use Application Form: Land Use Application Land Use Code: Land Use Code Land Use Code Section(s) 26.304 Common Development Review Procedures 26.435.030 B. 8040 Greenline Review Exemption 26.445.110 A. Insubstantial Amendments Review by: Planning Staff for compliance/completeness Public Hearing: Not Required Planning Fees: $1,300 Deposit for 4 hours of staff time. Additional staff time required is billed at $325/hour Referral Fees: Parks Referral - $650.00 (flat fee) . Engineering - $275.00 (per hour) with 1 hour deposit Total Deposit: $ 2,225.00 To apply, submit the following information: m Completed Land Use Application and signed fee agreement. Il Pre-application Conference Summary (this document). m Street address and legal description of the parcel on which development is proposed to occur, consisting of a current (no older than 6 months) certificate from a title insurance company, an ownership and encumbrance report, or attorney licensed to practice in the State of Colorado, listing the names of all owners of the property, and all mortgages, judgments, liens, easements, contracts and agreements affecting the parcel, and demonstrating the owner's right to apply for the Development Application. ASLU PD Amendment 675 S. Alps Road 1 , m Applicant's name, address and telephone number in a letter signed by the applicant that states the name, address and telephone number of the representative authorized to act on behalf of the applicant. m HOA Compliance form 0 A written description of the proposal and an explanation in written, graphic, or model form of how the proposed development complies with the review standards relevant to the development application and relevant land use approvals associated with the property. Il A site improvement survey (no older than a vear from submittal) including topography and vegetation showing the current status of the parcel certified by a registered land surveyor by licensed in the State of Colorado. 0 Written responses to all review criteria. m An 8 1/2" by 11" vicinity map locating the parcel within the City of Aspen. E 1 Complete Copy. If the copy is deemed complete by staff, the following items will then need to be submitted: ~ 2 Copies of the complete application packet and, if applicable, associated drawings. m Total deposit for review of the application. m A digital copy of the application provided in pdf file format. Disclaimer: The foregoing summary is advisory in nature only and is not binding on the City. The summary is based on current zoning, which is subject to change in the future, and upon factual representations that may or may not be accurate. The summary does not create a legal or vested right. 2 EXHIBIT #6 February 4, 2015 City of Aspen Parks Department Aspen, Colorado 81611 To whom it may concern, Rowland and Broughton Architects recently notified me of your concern with the soil nail walls at Zuma located at 675 South Alps, and the impact on existing trees. This morning I visited the site to review any potential conflicts. In looking at the planned soil nailing and the existing trees, I do not see any conflict to the root systems. The soil nailing will be anywhere from 8'-0" to 18'-0" below any existing trees and therefore will not impact any root systems. Furthermore, the existing retaining wall below the trees will not be changed or impacted during this process, resulting in no soil movement within the vicinity of the trees. If you have any further concerns, I would be happy to meet you on site to look at this issue. Thankyou. Sincerely, 6-4 ML~ Julie Hoffner Elite Land Design, LLC 525 Paseo Drive Carbondale, CO 81623 (970)963-1123 -- --Lizz_-8072 -2 51 - f / 1 ~- - -/1 -- / / - 4- -il W- -- - --- X / / / --- / // -- - -- 7 -\\ ---- - M / / rle , ' / 0 r, \ 1 / -- , 7 - , / / / / / // 1 / j \ 4.3/2 2 =TIENCEPLIT Pdr=-21-24-1-=y- 2 2 3 - mil_ - \\nh rowland+broughton / - -8080- * - N / -CO- -- - - -- _ _ --- / /- Â° --3 - :ki-put*jui,0 g c 34-_r = r r fz- r - x < z archutecture / urban design Antenor design \ 0- --- 0 ----- 0 --i- (Â«309,9*21 --/-- / %/ 1 234 e hoplonsave 1830 DIake st. ste 200 Â·, / i ' -CULVERT 1 aspen, co 81611 denver. co 80202 11 ~\ 9-- 9*/)(3239~44\ \*IJKof: 970 5449006 0 303 3081373 0 970 544 3473 f 303 3081375 f / ~,~, ~ ~ GATE~*/' %~<~~4 _ daylight downslope --O- / Foundation drain ~--v~_ $ 1Â« Â»i------------------ 1- ; -~ ---- 1 1 00 ~ - - below grade to / Â»112:- \ -4- - 2- - \/ 1 / , 1 --- -- j 41/0 / / 42- --- -r \ 09 i . Consul~- f 1 - CONIFEROUS TREE ~0. . - / Â£ \ 1\\ - Issue / \. ---- --- <- , '-- EXISTING BOULDER /0/ 6 L__-- 31 OCTOBER 2014 RETAINING WALL ' \1 I h 71 , PERMIT SUBMITTAL , 1,\ 1 4. b ~ Existing dry wells \ A )\ , / 1 -1 - C 5 ---I 01 MARCH 2015 j beyond building // /./. envelope below grade - --- PERMIT SUBMITTAL REVISIONS - 41 -\ \ / _-6- LOCATION OF 4 - - r- \\cf> Entry addition, per L EXISTING DRY 4 --/ Ordinance 11 (Series ( WELLS C* / 'of 2013) 2 -11- --- -- ~~E~~~~. Area of front walk. with ' . / '/2 , ' . -'- ----t--~=y--- ' ,- 1/ //,/ \\,/ / // ~~~ M~-FOUNDATION DRAIN TO ~ -- - - n 4 \ grad;ng, beyond ~ - k DAYLIGHT DOWNSLOPE K . / \/ LO.X..A._A_LAvk_U e \ // "--,# .--4/ 8082 \ 5///// Â» // // // / / -~I~----n Ab<r. ~~ ~ / \ - li- / / - buildin~ 331-~ <~ -' --i.~ ~ ~ ~~~~~ y Â¢0<e.ov 8% 1~ F , % - / / LINE OF R OF z ' - - . / 2\ 1 / 8084*- - i OVAHM 1/ / / / , - / 1 \ GAS METER // // - 4Es, /-. #.' -/ / - 1 -'-- COVERED 1 \* \ r.* 1 / \ r /// e / -8085- - - -fr // e , ENTRY , -1 //\ // 5 P o \F 'F// ./ -- \ / 1 . ./ 1 EXISTING -- - w / k -- K - -/ / /, 0 BOULDER n \ i , I \ \ 2, -- -/- \ 7/ /\\/ -- .... --- // / / /,/ , ef.\ \/ / LINE OF ROOF x / OVERHANG 0 / 1 : Â·~u Â»9,2 ' -- -Â»-*Â· --rÂ·n / 4 \ 4\ /: / / / \ \ ~ ~ EDGE OF PATIO <. _ -/ / '411&5/ 1 j -1 \ 4125 \ ./7/ * *firlii. 2=. s - - ------ < -Il H__I_- -- 1 ' -- - ' / BOULDER WALL / 1 \ -- -- , \ / \ , \ :_1- *..* - '</ I 1 EXISTING GATE TO m,\ - - , EXISTING BOUL-DER>.CL=c/.VU 1!r-1 *--// C 1 : ~~~~~~~~~~wt Jb--1--, ~ 8090 ~ REMAJN Master closet addition, u ' -J-~1 11 EXISTING LD RETAININ~INACL 97 \ --- - --- - \ U PLAYGROUND ~ -% Zkt % ;.li 7 / per Ordinance 11 ~ - EQUIPMENT 1 42 ip 127.~_ 1 1 (Series of 2013) 92- - - -4095-3-=Zin=-2Â» 't 1 r vt \ C \1 C / /-3-\. __ t / /4 - 45Â»S - f , // EXISTING SOIL NAIL ~~\ , , 40 - --- \ - --- \ 0 - -5 -2 EL z z - - - . 4 WALL %-- ...---5-0 99 - - ~23Â»_Â« -Â»11 Â».--fofÂ«*for__ 40 - //.///, f / /fs -- -%- . /.9 - = 4.-E 6-- - -0 - LE- 36333.--------(f)~7<~~9 PATIO 10% ~ , ~ ----- 22\\/ j / , -~- j--~ -1- --- 1 k k/ 9. \ // - LE-Â»~'2-~ ~~~~~~7-xx~--w-~_-_29'C/ ---- /--- )\ \- ,-Q < - 675 S. ALPS ROAD Â£ I (21\ -Â« _ - -.- \ .-- -- L ~~~~4 -~ LOCATION OF --1.21//9-0 .ZE lit -*% ..Â·- - / / . W Â£ T- -, t. - . \ \ * /0 xie _* \ \ - *-- - , - - 0-=*23*.#20.,5.2- - EXISTING SOIL NAIL - fl# /-Â»Â»:/i -- / WALL BELOW SNOWMELT -Â» 1 ~fÂ¢ 1 ~ BOILER /050Â«/Mie: 5*gy- -~ /GRAD ~ --9 -~--.-cig jj~jÂ«Â«w~uiti~~jou~'-f . ZUMA Kitchen addition. per 9 - - 4 ELECTRICAL PANELS %%_ I _._ _ ~~~'tkc_ --/41 - - >- - _ - - 'Ordinance 11 (Series - -0/%49>'f. // \ , 79.-BELOWGRADE- )_ --3- - A- - \ -- RESIDENCE of 2013) // /' 09 -I - - j./.U SOIL NAIL. Uppl_ - _ - - 1- / - --- / - -- SNOWMELT PUMP 64 -0- - T - -I -- - ...>Â«-3 2 2 2 2- -f# 2 2 23.7_27 -2 \ 2 '4 - 40 2 - - - - / / -- --~ i-- i--~ - -- -- ASPEN, CO 81611 KI-2- --El-:I /- _ EXISTING ABOVE - -I-Â·--2-,-_.,______ // i~- -j- M -\ ~--j/GRADESOILN,AlLE K ~ r C-, 343/Â«77~94219 -- Soil nails beyond - - - - -- --- -- / -- h X ~-- .-, -Â·LWALL TO REMAIN % / 2 - - - / - \7 -tr> / -/ - ---7- 1 r 1/43 ,\/4/ 4-3.3 // - , r i ./ ~ ~ ~ rl ~/ APPROXIMATE building envelope -2 - - I I >Cr -1- ' ' --1 OCATION OF NEW below grade. typ CHILLERS ~c_ BELOW GRADE SOIL NAIL WALL - 1 x K. B~LO~GRADE 4-= - C $' SOIL NAIL, TYP. 10 -->Â·C-- - Â·-1.-7.- +4 Z j,- t# ,/1 1 I -- p.1 2 / \\ / 6 / --2919-04022322-2--473Â«1%1-ttlif[Â·i]303:21< filtfi:3-Â·-93 --- -- # --- _ 19Â»30Â»iÂ»Â»tenici--3343:britist-3-~3-jil*32292'i * :ils~i - / PROPERTY" / / / / // -- /k - - --/ 1 .-i- li- \ h -N X . T ) --j. . , - 41, / / / / . - - -1. -1- .- K%-h ~LI .Ii- -- -- 0. I -.. -- 4- - - -- X V -- - - - -CE--f 5-51318-3-5-%''- 7L, 4 -h -\ -%9 -----/ 1, f -- Ii/ . * - I / A ,/ r- 1 / / 'C / ,-1 / , -t,rt--11-rj -, , -c- ~_, > ~ ~ ~ ~~~ ~~~~~ ~ ~~ ~ -1 ---- - K Â£ 0 - 01,0 ,,/ 45 :0,1 + p// - h .K - -t' \ ./ ---- / / / / 7 -- - -ri\ -1 / / 2 --- -1. 1--9-2Â»5-3 3 fE-3..ffil.Jigi}0ft ff-1- 14-2-43-93I--2 -1 t--3~j- / / / / / Â» / f -) - ~ --- - -- --- PROJECT NO / - 21364 -- 13 --- 1,1 2\ DWG FILE --- ---- -- \ %- 21364 Al-1_Compilaton dig r - 3 -3 -2 13--5-70 ..r-3- // // -/ /\ - / J \ \ \ \ / -\ 1 .{ It Â»-- / / // -- SHEET TITLE - 1 -1 1 Soil mails beyond P--4-r t. ~ /- -- 3 / '395.2/- 5 - -13- / -- _ building envelope Ir -- SITE PLAN behwgrad;,~r~ j ~ 1<6 < < //i --- - -- FL.~-1â‚¬EESI+INE-=~zernt--2---0 -1- --- 0 GENERAL NOTES SCALE: 1' = 10' - - - COMPILATION 1 REFDIMENSION PLANS FOR ELEVATION AT BUILDINGENTRY - -TRuk _123- -1 -\ 1 1 <1-, NORTH'' _7 UE&-r-j , '3<-C--j /C/1 /---7 --%- POINTS / / i - 1 . ..~=-- 5 2 REF CIVIL ENGINEERING PLANS FOR GRADING AND DRAINAGE ( 1 j ARCHITECTURAL SITE PLAN --- *-- -- - Zl.1 3 REFERENCE LANDSCAPE PLANS FOR EXTENT OF NEW ~Al.1 7 SCALE V = 10'-0" - .- LANDSCAPING AND EXISTING LANDSCAPE MATER]AL TO BE Li-) T}â‚¬ MN~ER. C*â‚¬>1~â€ž<-0*<xy-'CÂ»Â£.~01~TE-T-Â£.MJ,8â€ži PROTECTED IN PLACE hâ‚¬ -T- *LIS~ .TE.. CO,C-DI+>O,EN-G / / B#m-,L,-57An,1,Â»2Â¥,10/DegEEâ„¢.EÂ©glGHâ„¢ -m--Sg[N,CIO~~~~~~~Ill-=INIL*~. / M B.,40*.Te~,~Cm-*B,1, CESIGN SHAIL / 1 8083 8082 .t 'b, m 9 *ir \\\\\ 1 + 3 1 1 1 \\\\ \\\ \ 1 / 1/// 'ttl~~~~111// //// 1\ 11 (\ l\ 1 \\ 11 \ 1}~ 111 11~ i Ip'\11\\11\ '\ 1 01 iPis~Ars<frcii // /i//1//1 /1///1/i/// / 3 /1/ p 4/////1 / 1 i 49 till'I~~11 001 1 Â· 101 1 - ASLU ,=f:Fid'/119 FEB 1 0 2015 LAND USE APPLICATION APPLICANT: , CITY OF ASPEN 104" Name: 10,6 540Â¥-50. LLC- Location: 614 500('k At?4 (6.4.0 A,> e..i Co 'SAGU (Indicate street address, lot & block number, legal description where appropriate) Parcel ID # (REQUIRED) 2131 9& 5-60Â©i REPRESENTATIVE: Name: Arl,a.~ (1.&â€ž,~ 0 69 5<Â»act, 3RnÂ·c- Address: Q 0 60* 3 L co> Ap, ttÂ·-~- C.* 5,6 ll Phone #: 4-10 41,0 illY PROJECT: Name: MU.40\,A. 0 9 Q ArÂ·Â·~L.,& Â£ 904,0 G-LI-< ExcelÂ·- Address: 615- S -(L- Aif,4 (t= u Phone #: 410 - 41.0 -194 9 TYPE OF APPLICATION: (please check all that apply): Conditional Use El Conceptual PUD C Conceptual Historic Devt. Special Review Â® Final PUD (& PUD Amendment) U Final Historic Development Design Review Appeal El Conceptual SPA U Minor Historic Devt. GMQS Allotment U Final SPA (& SPA Amendment) U Historic Demolition GMQS Exemption U Subdivision C] Historic Designation ESA - SQAQ.QmenlinF, Stream ~ Subdivision Exemption (includes U Small Lodge Conversion/ Margin, Hallam Lake Bluff, condominiumization) Expansion Mountain View Plane Lot Split U Temporary Use El Other: Lot Line Adjustment U Text/Map Amendment EXISTING CONDITIONS: (description of existing buildings, uses, previous approvals, etc.) PROPOSAL: (description of proposed buildings, uses, modifications, etc.) 22 44*Â·14 Hove you attached the following? FEES DUE: $ 21-Lr E Pre-Application Conference Summary RF Attachment # 1, Signed Fee Agreement El Response to Attachment #3, Dimensional Requirements Form A 'A il Response to Attachment #4, Submittal Requirements- Including Written Responses to Review Standards mo 11 El c] El El El RETAIN FOR 0/4 -37560 PERMANENT b .LES 00 H, 2019 tâ€ži.Lul 600153 COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT Agreement to Pay Application Fees =CEIVE' An_agreement between the City of Aspen ("City") and "-fER-170-3 015 Property Icie Jackson LLC Phone No.. 970-920-2899 Owner ('*1") Email: c/o neilkarb@comcastnet cry OfÂ· .uPEN Address of 675 South Alps Road , i rn l :, APME k Billing 604 West Main Street 4 1 Property Aspen CO 81611 Address Aspen, CO 81611 (subject of (send bills here) application) I understand that the City has adopted, via Ordinance No. , Series of 2011, review fees for Land Use applications and the payment of these fees is a condition precedent to determining application completeness. I understand that as the property owner that I am responsible for paying all fees for this development application. For flat fees and referral fees: I agree to pay the following fees for the services indicated I understand that these flat fees are non-refundable 5 650 flat fee for Parl<s~ flat fee for S fiat fee for . S flat fee for For deposit cases only: The City and I understand that because of the size, nature or scope of the proposed project, it is not possible at this time to know the full extent or total costs involved in processing the application. 1 understand that additional costs over and above tile deposit may accrue. I understand and agree that it is impracticable for City staff to complete processing, review, and presentation of sufficient information 10 enable legally required findings to be nlade for project consideration, unless invoices are paid in full. The City and I understand and agree that invoices mailed by the City to the above listed billing address and not returned to the City shall be considered by the City as being received by me. I agree to remit payment within 30 days of presentation of an invoice by the City for such services. I have read, understood, and agree to the Land Use Review Fee Policy and consequences of non-payment including late fees of 1.75% per month. I agree to pay the following initial deposit amounts for the specified hours of staff time I understand that payment of a deposit does not render an application complete or compliant with approval criteria. If actual recorded costs exceed the initial deposit, I agree to pay additional monthly billings to the City to reimburse the City for the processing of my application at the hourly rates hereinafter stated. Sl,300 deposit for _4 V hours of Community Development Department staff time Additional time above the deposit amount will be~d at 3325 per hour S 275 deposit for _1 hours of Engineering Department staff time. Additional time above the deposit amount will be billed at $275 per hour. City of Aspen: Property Owner: ~3_ C Â£ 2- 731Â«. *cs. CSÂ«/ L L C F 1 Chris Bendon Community Development Director Name, A 1,1 2- 6 - 0-~0'21% Au,14_-~3- City Use: ~ 4 Title. A-,740 (2 < 41> Cr\ 0Â·~~ #[109 997,40 (* Fees Due: S_2,225.00 Received: 2,225Â·00 ~ IMA: Jamiary, 2013 C ity of Aspen I 130 S. Galena St, I (970) 920.5090 FEB 1 0 2015 A. 1 :- 1 4 L ' Â·Â· - I --- -- - -- 1 - L-3.-7.I:ily#,inliiniftall]JiT Homeowner Association Compliance Policy All land use applications within the City of Aspen are required to include a Honieowner Association Compliance Form (this form) certifying the scope of work included in the land use application complies with all applicable covenants and homeowner association policies. The certification must be sioned by the Droperty owner or Attorney repiesenting the Dropertv owner. Name: Icie Jackson LLC Property Owner El") Email: c/o neilkarb@comcast.net Phone No.: 970-920-1125 i Address of 675 South Alps Road Property Aspen, CO 81611 (subject of application) 1 certify as follows (pick one) 31 This properly is not subject to a homeowners association or other form of private covenant l_I This property is subject to a homeowners association or private covenant and the improvements proposed in this land use application do not require approval by the homeowners association or covenant beneficiary U This properly is subject to a homeowners association or private covenant and the improvements proposed in this land use application have been approved by the homeowners association or covenant beneficiary. Evidence of approval is attached. I understand this policy and I understand the City of Aspen do:es not interpret, enforce, or manage the applicability, meaning or effect of private covenants or honieowner association rules or bylaws. I understand that this document is a public document, I C i g JAct (61 5.J L L L Owner signature: 9 A,Al- Â·-: -- date' 2--4-/ r Owner printed name: 2,1 1 5. 17*c W.Â£4*-46 1/ L Or. date 2 -1 -/E Attorney signature: Attorney printed name: Ag, L_ 0 14448,4-Â·A L__~ -1 THE CITY OF ASPEN Land Use Application Determination of Completeness Date: February 12,2015 Dear City of Aspen Land Use Review Applicant, We have received your land use application for a PD Amendment for 675 S. Alps Road and reviewed it for completeness. O Your Land Use Application is incomplete: Please submit the following missing submission items so that we may begin reviewing your application. No review hearings will be scheduled until all of the submission contents listed above have been submitted and are to the satisfaction of the City of Aspen Planner reviewing the land use application. ~>g~Your Land Use Application is complete: If there are not missing items listed above, then your application has been deemed complete. Please submit the following to begin the land use review process. Other submission items may be requested throughout the review process as deemed necessary by the Community Development Department. Please contact me at 429-2759 if you have any questions. Thank You, r-q 0-49<>44 Jennifer thilan, Deputy Planning Director City o f Aspen, Community Development Department For Office Use OnlY: Qualifying Applications: Mineral Rights NÂ®ce Required New PD Yes No //- Subdivision, or PD (creating more than 1 additional lot) GMQS Allotments Residential Affordable Housing Yes No 4r Commercial E.P.F. Lodging