HomeMy WebLinkAboutcoa.lu.ca.202 N Monarch St.0052.2015.ASLU0052.2015. ASLU 202 N. MONARCH ST
MU ZONE DISTRICT - CODE INTERPRETATION
273707317031
e �,'�' ' y � C� / Jd� S
./GK[�
CI
A
THE CITY OF ASPEN
City of Aspen Community Development Department
CASE NUMBER
PARCEL ID NUMBERS
PROJECT ADDRESS
PLANNER
CASE DESCRIPTION
REPRESENTATIVE
DATE OF FINAL ACTION
0052.2015.ASLU
2737 07317031
202 N MONARCH ST
BECKY LEVY
CODE INTERPRETATION
MU ZONE DISTRICT
06/11/2015
CLOSED BY ANGELA SCOREY ON: 09/10/2015
Permit;
File Edit Reccrd Navigate Form Reports Format Tab Help
►i �LryJ" 4L) r_- - - Jump 1
—r -
Main Custom Fields Ranting Status Fee Summary i AAc Lions Routing History
Permit type aslu - Aspen Land Use Permit # 0052 2015.ASLU
Address 02 N MONARCH ApUSuite
City ASPEN State CO Zip 81611
Permit Information
D S. Master permit Routing queue aslul5 Applied 05/20/2015
Z " Project 1 Status pending Approved
Q _
Description APPLICATION FOR 202 N. MONARCH ST, MU ZONE DISTRICT . CODE Issued -
INTERPRETATION
Close&Final -
Submitted WILLIAM •917-977.0541 Clods Running Days 0 Expires 0511412016
Submitted via
Owner
Last name WEB CAPITAL, LLC First name WILLIAM BOEHRINGER PO BOX 3807
ASPEN CO 81612
Phone (917) 977-0541 Address
Applicant
✓ Owner is applicant? Contractor is applicant?
Last name WEB CAPITAL, LLC First name WILLIAM BOEHRINGER PO BOX 3807
ASPEN CO 81612
Phone (917) 9774)541 Cust # 30078 Address
Email williamb@webcapNc.com
Lender
Last name First name
Phone ( ) Address
Displays the permit owner's first name AspenGold5 (server) robertg — 1 of 1 I
PUBLIC NOTICE
RE: INTERPRETATION
NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN to the general public that a code interpretation regarding
Subsection 26.710.180(D)(13), Commercial/residential ratio; Subsection
26.710.180.(D)(11), Floor area ratio; and, Section 26.104.100 Definitions of the City of
Aspen Land Use Code, requested by Bill Boehringer, was rendered on June 2, 2015 and
is available for public inspection in the Community Development Department. For
further information, contact Rebecca Levy, at the City of Aspen Community
Development Dept., 130 S. Galena St, Aspen, Colorado (970) 429-2755.
s/ City of Aspen
Published in The Aspen Times on June I Vh, 2015
CITY OF ASPEN
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT
LAND USE CODE INTERPRETATION
JURSIDICTION: City of Aspen
APPLICABLE CODE SECTIONS: 26.710.180(D)(13)
Commercial/Residential Ratio,
26.710.180(D)(11) Floor Area Ratio,
26.104.100 Definitions
DATE:
WRITTEN BY:
APPROVED BY:
June 2, 2015
Rebecca Levy, Planner
Chris Bendon
Community Development Director
SUMMARY: The Applicant is requesting an interpretation of the Mixed -Use zone district
dimensional requirements for the commercial/residential ratio described in 26.710.181(D)(13),
and is requesting an interpretation regarding the applicability of commercial parking facilities as a
commercial use in mixed -use buildings.
BACKGROUND:
The Applicant is inquiring about the ability to develop a mixed use building on a vacant lot in the
Mixed -Use zone district. The Applicant wants to know if development of a building containing
affordable housing units and free-market residential units would be permitted, and whether a
commercial parking facility is considered a commercial use.
DISCUSSION:
Staff relied on the following parts of the land use code to render this interpretation.
Section 26.710.180, Mixed -Use, of the Land Use Code identifies both affordable multi -family
housing and free-market multi -family housing as permitted uses in the Mixed -Use zone district.
Section 26.710.180.D, Dimensional Requirements states that all 13 Subsections of Section D
"shall apply to all permitted and conditional uses in the Mixed Use (MU) zone district." Thus, the
last paragraph of Subsection D.13, Commercial/residential ratio, would apply to all new
development proposals.
Subsection D.13 sets a minimum ratio of free-market residential floor area to commercial floor
area on a site when developed. This section specifically states that "the total free-market
residential net livable area shall be no greater than 150% the total floor area associated with the
uses described in Subparagraph 26.710.180.D.1 La.1 located on the same parcel." Thus, the uses
countable towards commercial floor area are those described under Subparagraph
Page 1 of 2
26.710.180.D.1 La.1, which are "commercial; lodge; timeshare lodge; exempt timesharing; arts,
cultural and civic uses; public uses; recreational uses; and, academic uses."
Commercial parking facilities are included in the definition of "mixed -use" as a type of
commercial use within a mixed -use development. Specifically, Subsection 26.104.100 defines
mixed -use as:
"The use of land or a structure for more than one (1) of the following land uses:
Commercial, which shall include retail and restaurant uses, neighborhood commercial
uses, office uses, service uses, service commercial industrial uses, food market and
commercial parking facilities, but which shall exclude agricultural uses and artist studios
[emphasis added];
Residential, which shall include detached dwelling, attached dwelling, single-family
dwelling, duplex dwelling, multi -family dwelling, manufactured home, free-market
residence, affordable housing, employee housing, group hdme�,' dormitory, accessory
dwelling unit and carriage house;
Lodging, which shall include hotel, timeshare lodge and exempt timesharing, but shall
exclude boardinghouse and bed and breakfast;
Civic, which shall include arts, cultural and civic uses; child care center; essential public
facilities; recreational use and public uses; but shall exclude open space, open use
recreation site; and
Accessory uses, temporary uses and the ownership of property by a nonprofit organization
that is not used as set forth above shall not qualify a property or structure as mixed -use."
INTERPRETATION
Based upon the sections of the Code referenced above, the net livable area associated with a free-
market residential use must be less than 150% of the total floor area associated with a
commercial use on the same parcel. A commercial parking facility is considered a commercial
use in a mixed -use building or site, and may be allowed as a conditional use in the Mixed -Use
zone district.
APPEAL OF DECISION:
Any person who has made a request for interpretation may appeal the decision of the Community
Development Director to the City Council in accordance with the appeal procedures set forth in
Chapter 26.316 Appeals.
Page 2 of 2
CITY OF ASPEN
PRE -APPLICATION CONFERENCE SUMMARY
PLANNER: Sara Adams, 429-2778 DATE: 5/8/2015
PROJECT: Code Interpretation — 26.710.180
APPLICANT: Bill Boehringer, williamb webcapllc.com, 917-977-0541
DESCRIPTION:
The potential applicant requests a code interpretation to determine the meaning of section 26.710.181(D)(13)
of the land use code. This section outlines the required ratio of commercial floor area to free-market residential
net livable area.
Land Use Code Section(s)
26.104.100 Definitions
Z ri
26.470.070.5.4 Mixed -Use Zone District, Commercial/residential ratio
a
26.306 Interpretations of Title
r
C J
Cl)
< µr',
Link to the Land Use Code: hap://www.aspenpitkin.com/Departments/Community-
V
Development/Planning-and-Zoning/Title-26-Land-Use-Code/UJ
Review by: - Staff
U
Public Hearing: No
U
Planning Fees: $81.00 Flat Fee.
To apply, submit the following information:
1. Total fee for review of the application.
2. Completed Land Use Application Form. Page 2, and agreement to pay.
hftp://www,aspenpitkin.com/Departments/Community-DevelopmenvPlanning-and-
Zoning/Applications-and-Fees/
3. A Pre -Application Conference Summary (This document).
4. A letter signed by the applicant, with the applicant's name, address and telephone number in a
letter signed by the applicant, which states the name, address and telephone number
of the
representative authorized to act on behalf of the applicant.
5. Letter requesting an interpretation.
6. 2 Copies of the complete application packet.
Disclaimer:
The foregoing summary is advisory in nature only and is not binding on the City. The summary is based on
current zoning, which is subject to change in the future, and upon factual representations that may or may
not be accurate. The summary does not create a legal or vested right.
oosa . ao 15-.14S LL)
ATTACHMENT 2 —LAND USE APPLICATION
PROJECT:
Name: NO A, Z-
Location: G Z / "`�►1 �J S�' .Sr Z
Indicate street address, lot & block number, legal description where appropriate)
Parcel ID # (REQUIRED) O 7 3
APPLICANT'
Name: — o ,�
Address: S 2 <2
Phone #: — —C)Sql
1FPRF'�1W.NTATIVF-
i
Name: 'C/i '6�1'
Address: O lSox - g0 7
Phone #: — c7 7 7— O S-%l
TYPE OF APPLICATION: (please check all that apply):
❑
GMQS Exemption
❑
Conceptual PUD
❑
Temporary Use
❑
GMQS Allotment
❑
Final PUD (& PUD Amendment)
❑
Text/Map Amendment
❑
Special Review
❑
Subdivision
❑
Conceptual SPA
❑
ESA — 8040 Greenline, Stream
❑
Subdivision Exemption (includes
❑
Final SPA (& SPA
Margin, Hallam Lake Bluff,
condominiumization)
Amendment)
Mountain View Plane
❑
Commercial Design Review
❑
Lot Split
❑
Small Lodge Conversion/
Expansion
❑
Residential Design Variance
❑
Lot Line Adjustment
❑
Other:
❑
Conditional Use
EXISTING CONDITIONS: (description of existing buildings, uses, previous approvals, etc.)
&,",'y- 4
'ROPOSAL: (description of proposed buildings, uses, modifications, etc
ave you attached the following? FEES DUE: $ 6
FT�re-Application Conference Summary
Attachment # 1, Signed Fee Agreement
❑ Response to Attachment #3, Dimensional Requirements Form
❑ Response to Attachment #4, Submittal Requirements- Including Written Responses to Review Standards
❑ 3-D Model for large project
All plans that are larger than 8.5" X I I" must be folded. A disk with an electric copy of all written text
(Microsoft Word Format) must be submitted as part of the application. Large scale projects should include an
electronic 3-D model. Your pre -application conference summary will indicate if you must submit a 3-D model.
WEB CAPITAL LLC
PO Box 3807
Aspen, CO 81612
williambgwebcapllc.com
917-977-0541
May 12, 2015
Ms. Sara Adams
Senior Planner
Planning & Zoning - CITY OF ASPEN
130 S. Galena Street
3rd Floor
Aspen, CO 81611
RE: Interpretation requested for Commercial/Residential Ratio — Mixed Use zone
202 N. Monarch Street — SUB LOT 2
Dear Sara,
Please find attached the Pre -Application forms completed, for the requested code interpretation of a
possible ratio of Residential on vacant property in the Mixed -Use Zone (not in the Main Street Historic
District).
• To make the project feasible, we would like to maximize the Free-market residential, which per
the MU zone is capped at .75:1 (= 3991 sf of FAR on this particular lot) as long as "affordable
housing floor area equal to 100% of the residential free-market floor area is developed on the
same parcel", which is what we intend to do and more.
• The balance of the FAR we would like to make 100% affordable housing.
• We do not anticipate building any commercial on the site. We do not intend to vary floor area,
height, parking, or affordable housing for this project; we only would like to increase the amount
of Affordable Housing beyond that which is required, in lieu of providing some commercial
space which is less in demand at this location).
First, we would like an interpretation that subsection D.13 in the MU zone parameters would not be
relevant as a limiting factor in our case, being that we would not have any Commercial on the site.
would hope that the City & community wo support the project beiagiliat that 6,651 sf of the t
10,642sf allowable FAR wo�I ordable Housing, rather than some co al and ch less
Affordable Housing.
Second, as an alternative, could parking be qualified as a `commercial' use in order to satisfy subsection
D.13, if fees were charged or spaces leased as a business operation? f so, have two oher questions:
a) Could the commercial parking area, i ther su grade or op n-air carp s e, not be
considered to consume floor area which d otherwise be used for A da Housing?
b) Would below -grade or above-gra king subject to an Afford e Housing itigation
requirements, as would be co ercial offices.
We understand that other options would be to propose a code amendment with our land use application
that would amend subsection D.13 to allow what we are proposing, or to request a Planned Development
to vary that dimension. We understand that there is no guarantee that City would support either of those
options. We would not be varying floor area, height, parking, or affordable housing, so we understand
that these options would not trigger an automatic public vote under the new Charter Amendment.
However, code amendments and the creation of a new Planned Development Overlay (because it's
considered a rezoning) are both referable actions, so a citizen could petition to get either of these options
on the ballot.
a) Is it common that citizens get such proposals placed on ballot?
b) Does it take a certain number of citizens to petition a proposal in order to be placed on ballot?
I reviewed the AH/PUD zoning, and it does not help us for this property to be re -zoned to AH/PUD being
that the FAR would be capped at 1.1:1 under AH/PUD, vs. up to 2:1 for keeping the zoning as MU in this
location (being not within the Main Street Historic District).
Many thank oryour as ' nce in this regard,
Bill Bo hringer
KWX
��. CS
Agreement to Pay Application Fees
tin agreement oetween the Utv of ASoen (-L;itv ) ano
Property WEB Capital LLC Phone No.: 917-977-0541
Owner ("I"): Email: williamb@webcapllc.com
Address of 202 N. Monarch Street - LOT 2 Billing PO Box 3807
Property: Address: Aspen, CO 81612
(subject of (send bills here)
application)
understand that the City has adopted, via Ordinance No. , Series of 2011, review fees for Land Use applications
and the payment of these fees is a condition precedent to determining application completeness. I understand
that as the property owner that I am responsible for paying all fees for this development application.
For flat fees and referral fees: I agree to pay the following fees for the services indicated. I understand that these
flat fees are non-refundable.
$0
$0
flat fee for Select Dept
flat fee for Select Dept
$ 0 flat fee for Select Dept
$ 0 flat fee for Select Review
For deposit cases only: The City and I understand that because of the size, nature or scope of the proposed
project, it is not possible at this time to know the full extent or total costs involved in processing the application. I
understand that additional costs over and above the deposit may accrue. I understand and agree that it is
impracticable for City staff to complete processing, review, and presentation of sufficient information to enable
legally required findings to be made for project consideration, unless invoices are paid in full.
The City and I understand and agree that invoices mailed by the City to the above listed billing address and not
returned to the City shall be considered by the City as being received by me. I agree to remit payment within 30
days of presentation of an invoice by the City for such services.
I have read, understood, and agree to the Land Use Review Fee Policy including consequences for non-payment.
I agree to pay the following initial deposit amounts for the specified hours of staff time. I understand that payment
of a deposit does not render an application complete or compliant with approval criteria. If actual recorded costs
exceed the initial deposit, I agree to pay additional monthly billings to the City to reimburse the City for the
processing of my application at the hourly rates hereinafter stated.
$ 8 1 deposit for hours of Community Development Department staff time. Additional time
above the deposit amount will be billed at $325 per hour.
$ deposit for 0 hours of Engineering Department staff time. Additional time above the deposit
amount will be billed at $265 per hour.
City of Aspen: Property Owners /311
Chris Bendon
Community Development Director
Williafri Boehringer
City Use:
Title: Manager
Fees Due: $ 81 Received: $
ATTACHMENT 3
DIMENSIONAL REQUIREMENTS FORM
Project: ZG Z /Z1` /U%.I, _/, Sj�, -4d TZ.
Applicant: B L S t T q i,-L L
Location: ZG a _Z,/'
Zone District: A4 1A
Lot Size: OS.
Lot Area: G 3 L ( L t v / d_V, Ya S/eQ2_ rG 147-1
(for the purposes of calculating Floor Area, Lot Area may be reduced or areas
within the high water mark, easements, and steep slopes. Please refer to the
definition of Lot Area in the Municipal Code.)
Commercial net leasable: Existing: 0 Proposed: O
Number of residential units: Existing: O Proposed: /- and 4(, C q6o`& e" -t- Z Fee�-
Number of bedrooms: Existing: 6 Proposed: `Z A E{�rdoJ.G� + t �' �q�5 s.IC
y er--,
Proposed % of demolition (Historic properties only):
DIMENSIONS:
�� ���
Floor Area:
Existing:
O
Allowable: / (� J 2
Principal bldg. height:
Existing.•_)
Allowable: Proposed:�73 z `"—
Access. bldg. height:
Existing:
o
Allowable: n Proposed.• ✓t �.
On -Site parking:
Existing:
o
Required: g Proposed:
% Site coverage:
Existing:
a
Required: Proposed:
% Open Space:
Existing:
Required: ,v//j Proposed:
Front Setback:
Existing:
o
Required: (0 Proposed. to
Rear Setback:
Existing:
o
Required: S Proposed: S
Combined F/R:
Existing:
o
Required: ( S \ Proposed: IS t
Side Setback:
Existing:
16
Required: S r Proposed: S
Side Setback:
Existing:
C
i
Required: 5-Proposed: �_
Combined Sides:
Existing:
Required: /G Proposed:1_
Distance Between
Existing
p
v Required: o Proposed: a
Buildings
Existing non -conformities
or encroachments-.
—
Variations requested.
RECEIVEn
MAY 12 2015 CITY OF ASPEN
PRE -APPLICATION CONFERENCE SUMMARY
PLAAWK:OF ASPEN Sara Adams, 429-2778 DATE: 518/2015
PRdJEC TY DF-f-l•OMW Code Interpretation — 26.710.180
APPLICANT: Bill Boehringer, williamb(cDwebcapllc.com, 917-977-0541
DESCRIPTION:
The potential applicant requests a code interpretation to determine the meaning of section 26.710.181(D)(13)
of the land use code. This section outlines the required ratio of commercial floor area to free-market residential
net livable area.
Land Use Code Section(s)
26.104.100 Definitions
26.470.070.5.4 Mixed -Use Zone District, Commercial/residential ratio
26.306 Interpretations of Title
Link to the Land Use Code: http:l/www.aspenpitkin.comlDepartmentslCommunity-
DevelopmentlPlanning-and-Zoning/Title-26-Land-Use-Code/
Review by: - Staff
Public Hearing: No
Planning Fees: $81.00 Flat Fee.
To apply, submit the following information:
1. Total fee for review of the application.
2. Completed Land Use Application Form. Page 2, and agreement to pay.
http://www aspenpitkin com/Departments/Community-DevelopmenvPlanning-and-
Zoning/Applications-and-Fees/
3. A Pre -Application Conference Summary (This document).
4. A letter signed by the applicant, with the applicant's name, address and telephone number in a
letter signed by the applicant, which states the name, address and telephone number of the
representative authorized to act on behalf of the applicant.
5. Letter requesting an interpretation.
6. 2 Copies of the complete application packet.
Disclaimer:
The foregoing summary is advisory in nature only and is not binding on the City. The summary is based on
current zoning, which is subject to change in the future, and upon factual representations that may or may
not be accurate. The summary does not create a legal or vested right.
WEB CAPITAL LLC
PO Box 3807
Aspen, CO 81612
wi l liamb(c�r�,webcapl Ic.com
917-977-0541
May 12, 2015
Ms. Sara Adams
Senior Planner
Planning & Zoning - CFrY OF ASPEN
130 S. Galena Street
3rd Floor
Aspen, CO 81611
RE: Interpretation requested for Commercial/Residential Ratio — Mixed Use zone
202 N. Monarch Street — SUB LOT 2
Dear Sara,
Please find attached the Pre -Application forms completed, for the requested code interpretation of a
possible ratio of Residential on vacant property in the Mixed -Use Zone (not in the Main Street Historic
District).
• To make the project feasible, we would like to maximize the Free-market residential, which per
the MU zone is capped at .75:1 (= 3991 sf of FAR on this particular lot) as long as "affordable
housing floor area equal to 100% of the residential free-market floor area is developed on the
same parcel", which is what we intend to do and more.
The balance of the FAR we would like to make 100% affordable housing.
• We do not anticipate building any commercial on the site. We do not intend to vary floor area,
height, parking, or affordable housing for this project; we only would like to increase the amount
of Affordable Housing beyond that which is required, in lieu of providing some commercial
space which is less in demand at this location).
First, we would like an interpretation that subsection D.13 in the MU zone parameters would not be
relevant as a limiting factor in our case, being that we would not have any Commercial on the site. We
would hope that the City & community would support the project being that that 6,651 sf of the total
10,642sf allowable FAR would be all Affordable Housing, rather than some commercial and much less
Affordable Housing.
Second, as an alternative, could parking be qualified as a `commercial' use in order to satisfy subsection
D.13, if fees were charged or spaces leased as a business operation? If so, we have two further questions:
a) Could the commercial parking area, if either sub -grade or open-air carport style, not be
considered to consume floor area which could otherwise be used for Affordable Housing?
b) Would below -grade or above -grade parking be subject to an Affordable Housing mitigation
requirements, as would be commercial offices?
We understand that other options would be to propose a code amendment with our land use application
that would amend subsection D.13 to allow what we are proposing, or to request a Planned Development
to vary that dimension. We understand that there is no guarantee that City would support either of those
options. We would not be varying floor area, height, parking, or affordable housing, so we understand
that these options would not trigger an automatic public vote under the new Charter Amendment.
However, code amendments and the creation of a new Planned Development Overlay (because it's
considered a rezoning) are both referable actions, so a citizen could petition to get either of these options
on the ballot.
a) Is it common that citizens get such proposals placed on ballot?
b) Does it take a certain number of citizens to petition a proposal in order to be placed on ballot?
I reviewed the AH/PUD zoning, and it does not help us for this property to be re -zoned to AH/PUD being
that the FAR would be capped at 1.1:1 under AH/PUD, vs. up to 2:1 for keeping the zoning as MU in this
location (being not within the Main Street Historic District).
Many thankooryour ass' ce in this regard,
Bill B hringer
ATTACHMENT 2 —LAND USE APPLICATION
PROJECT:
Name: 2L) ` `/ t-t - a c- 2-
Location: (� /L'. / "`a�1aJ S�' SGIr� /_r � Z-
(indicate street address, lot & block number, legal description where appropriate)
Parcel ID # (REQUIRED) O 7 3
LPPLICANT:
Name: _ z
Address: �' �, - ��J� , L
Phone #:
1EPRGCFNTATIVE:
Name:
Address: g6 % ./ �•t G ����
Phone #: / 7 - ej 7 %- C:' S�//
TYPE OF APPLICATION: (please check all that apply):
❑
GMQS Exemption
❑
Conceptual PUD
❑
Temporary Use
❑
GMQS Allotment
❑
Final PUD (& PUD Amendment)
❑
Text/Map Amendment
❑
Special Review
❑
Subdivision
❑
Conceptual SPA
❑
ESA - 8040 Greenline, Stream
❑
Subdivision Exemption (includes
❑
Final SPA (& SPA
Margin, Hallam Lake Bluff,
condom iniumization)
Amendment)
Mountain View Plane
❑
Commercial Design Review
❑
Lot Split
❑
Small Lodge Conversion/
Expansion
❑
Residential Design Variance
❑
Lot Line Adjustment
❑
Other:
❑
Conditional Use
EXISTING CONDITIONS: (description of existing buildings uses previous approvals, etc.)
ROPOSAL: (description of proposed buildings, uses, modifications, etc.)
Z �rl�L O/fdc'S S t�% .7>Q476 SF_
ave you attached the following? FEES DUE: S
re -Application Conference Summary
Attachment # 1, Signed Fee Agreement
❑ Response to Attachment #3, Dimensional Requirements Form
❑ Response to Attachment #4, Submittal Requirements- Including Written Responses to Review Standards
❑ 3-D Model for large project
All plans that are larger than 8.5" X I I" must be folded. A disk with an electric copy of all written text
(Microsoft Word Format) must be submitted as part of the application. Large scale projects should include an
electronic 3-D model. Your pre -application conference summary will indicate if you must submit a 3-D model.
Agreement to Pay Application Fees
An agreement between the U0 of Aspen (" Uity") ano
Property WEB Capital LLC Phone No.: 917-977-0541
Owner ("I"): Email: williamb@webcapllc.com
Address of 202 N. Monarch Street - LOT 2 Billing PO Box 3807
Property: Address:
(subject of
(send bills here) Aspen, CO 81612
application)
I understand that the City has adopted, via Ordinance No. , Series of 2011, review fees for Land Use applications
and the payment of these fees is a condition precedent to determining application completeness. I understand
that as the property owner that I am responsible for paying all fees for this development application.
For flat fees and referral fees: I agree to pay the following fees for the services indicated. I understand that these
flat fees are non-refundable.
$0
flat fee for Select Dept
$ 0 flat fee for Select Dept
$ 0 flat fee for Select Dept $ 0 flat fee for Select Review
For deposit cases only: The City and I understand that because of the size, nature or scope of the proposed
project, it is not possible at this time to know the full extent or total costs involved in processing the application. I
understand that additional costs over and above the deposit may accrue. I understand and agree that it is
impracticable for City staff to complete processing, review, and presentation of sufficient information to enable
legally required findings to be made for project consideration, unless invoices are paid in full.
The City and I understand and agree that invoices mailed by the City to the above listed billing address and not
returned to the City shall be considered by the City as being received by me. I agree to remit payment within 30
days of presentation of an invoice by the City for such services.
I have read, understood, and agree to the Land Use Review Fee Policy including consequences for non-payment.
I agree to pay the following initial deposit amounts for the specified hours of staff time. I understand that payment
of a deposit does not render an application complete or compliant with approval criteria. If actual recorded costs
exceed the initial deposit, I agree to pay additional monthly billings to the City to reimburse the City for the
processing of my application at the hourly rates hereinafter stated.
$ 81 deposit for hours of Community Development Department staff time. Additional time
above the deposit amount will be billed at $325 per hour.
$ 0 deposit for 0 hours of Engineering Department staff time. Additional time above the deposit
amount will be billed at $265 per hour.
G
City of Aspen: Property Owner-7
c
Chris Bendon Williafri�Boehringer
Community Development Director ame:
City Use:
Title: Manager
Fees Due: $ 81 Received: $
ATTACHMENT 3
DIMENSIONAL REQUIREMENTS FORM
Project: Z Z T 2-
Applicant: ,cQ C I T '4 L �- L L
Location: �6 Z �(' �o,�Q,- st - L d 2--
Zone District: .4 4 Lt
Lot Size: O s f
Lot Area: S 3 2-1 c? t I-0 c
(for the purposes of calculating Floor Area, Lot Area may be reduced forr areas
within the high water mark, easements, and steep slopes. Please refer to the
definition of Lot Area in the Municipal Code.)
Commercial net leasable: Existing: 0 Proposed.• O
Number of residential units: Existing: o Proposed: y ard�d( C q60SF- e Z Fe,
Number of bedrooms: Existing: b Proposed: (Z A (6,rA.4L + Maw q45 s-f
eat
Fri-/�'t�kt
Proposed % of demolition (Historic properties only):
DIMENSIONS:
(2.
Floor Area:
Existing.
O
Allowable: %p �f�Z Proposed:
Principal bldg. height:
Existing: C)
Allowable:��_Proposed:`—
Access. bldg. height:
Existing.
o
Allowable: n4b_ Proposed:
On -Site parking:
Existing:
o
Required: S Proposed: �'f warms)
%Site coverage:
Existing:
D
Required: Proposed:
% Open Space:
Existing:
0>
Required: ti 14 Proposed:
Front Setback:
Existing.
n
Required.• (0 � Proposed: to �
Rear Setback:
Existing:
o
Required: S + Proposed: 5
Combined F/R:
Existing:
O
Required: (S Proposed: (�
Side Setback:
Existing:
16
Required: S Proposed: 5-1
Side Setback:
Existing:
O
Required: Proposed.• S
Combined Sides:
Existing:
6
' O�
Required: AO Proposed:1_
Distance Between
Existing
D
0 Required: o Proposed: a
Buildings
Existing non -conformities
or encroachments: —
Variations requested:
THF. CITY of ASPEN
Land Use Application
Determination of Completeness
Date: May 18, 2015
Dear City of Aspen Land Use Review Applicant,
We have received your land use application for MU zone district — Code Interpretation and have
reviewed it for completeness.
Ll Your Land Use Application is incomplete:
Please submit the following missing submission items so that we may begin reviewing your
application. No review hearings will be scheduled until all of the submission contents listed
above have been submitted and are to the satisfaction of the City of Aspen Planner reviewing
the land use application.
�l Your Land Use Application is complete:
If there are not missing items listed above, then your application has been deemed complete.
Please submit the following to begin the land use review process.
Other submission items may be requested throughout the review process as deemed necessary by
the Community Development Department. Please contact me at 429-2759 if you have any
questions.
Thank You,
Toeel'an, Deputy Planning Director
City en, Community Development Department
For Office Use Only:
Mineral Rights Notice Required
Yes No
GMQS Allotments
Yes No 7
Qualifying Applications:
New PD
Subdivision, or PD (creating more than l additional lot)
Residential Affordable Housing
Commercial E.P.F. Lodging