The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutLand Use Case.101 E Hallam St.0031.2014.AHPC0031.2014. AHPC 101 E HALLAM ST 273512437001 CONCEPTUAL HISTORIC DEVELOPMENT 1 - 12*555-4, sc U' ,-l 'A| C K 04\ m : 2 90â€žPS 046 06 P . THE CITY OF ASPEN City of Aspen Community Development Department CASE NUMBER: 0031.2014.AHPC PARCEL ID NUMBERS: 2735-124-37-001 PROJECT ADDRESS: 101 E HALLAM ST PLANNER: AMY SIMON CASE DESCRIPTION: CONCEPTUAL HISTORIC DEVELOPMENT STEEV WILSON, FORUM PHI, FOR REPRESENTATIVE: HALLAM LLC DEVELOPMENT ORDER DATE OF FINAL ACTION: 10/10/2014 CLOSED BY: ROBERT GREGOR ON: 08/13/2015 003( Â· 20/44#fc t -r Pemlits -Wi ~'-IX r.1,1 1 - -L- | - Eve St 9 1-1,12 la' gate Fgrm Reports Format Iab Help V. '0 0, % 1 Â· 24 : : E 4 1 jump 1 [9,2 U o , li 2 4 u 3 2 -: 0.- 113 ( 03 .46 0. ] Main~ Custom FielIs RoÂ¢ng Status Fee Summa[Y *ions Routing History ! 8 Permittme 31% IA.spen Historic Land Use PermR f ~003120141 HPC . : ] Address 101 E HALLAM ST AMÂ®te I City ASPEN State CO -~ Zip 181611 Permt Infomiation 3- 1 Master permit Routing queue aslu01 Applied 06/242014 Projed st* Ipending Approved Description APPLICA~ON FOR H?C CONCEPTUAL DEVELOPMEIf Issued Cosed/Final i Submitted |STEEV WILSON 910 279 4109 ~ Clock ~JIFIE Days ~-0~ Expires ~06/19,2016 , ] &mE : Last name HALLAM LLC Frd namel ~34 W HALUM ST ASPEN CO 81611 Phone C) - Address i E Owner is applicant? Il Contradoris applicant? Last Blame IHALLAM LLC 1 First name 1434 W HALLAM ST ' IASPEN CO 81611 Phonet 1 - 1CuK; ~29842 | AddrpRE| ! Lender 1 Last name I 1 First name I 3 Phone k 1 - Address Displaysthe pemiitlender's address AspenGold5 (serve(.'angeles'~~~: clair l (A 6 1 72 Aa.<#4 5446 SPA ID 440/* 115 ~ sejoIN )10!n ~ xogloo-L| ~ sdn DEVELOPMENT ORDER ofthe City of Aspen Community Development Department This Development Order, hereinafter "Order", is hereby issued pursuant to Section 26.304.070, "Development Orders", and Section 26.308.010, "Vested Property Rights", of the City of Aspen Municipal Code. This Order allows development of a site specific development plan pursuant to the provisions of the land use approvals, described herein. The effective date of this Order shall also be the initiation date of a three-year vested property right. The vested property right shall expire on the day after the third anniversary of the effective date of this Order, unless a building permit is approved pursuant to Section 26.304.075, or unless an exemption, extension, reinstatement, or a revocation is issued by City Council pursuant to Section 26.308.010. After Expiration of vested property rights, this Order shall remain in full force and effect, excluding any growth management allotments granted pursuant to Section 26.470, but shall be subject to any amendments to the Land Use Code adopted since the effective date of this Order. This Development Order is associated with the property noted below for the site specific development plan as described below. Hallam LLC, c/o Forum Phi Architects, 715 W. Main Street, Suite 204, Aspen, CO 81611. Property Owner's Name, Mailing Address 101 E. Hallam, Lot A and the west 4.86' of Lot B, Block 65, City and Townsite of Aspen, Colorado, PID# 2735-124-37-001. Legal Description and Street Address of Subject Property HPC granted Minor Development approval to construct a new addition to the existing Victorian house. and Temporary Relocation and Setback Variances to underpin and excavate a basement beneath the house. Written Description of the Site Specific Plan and/or Attachment Describing Plan Historic Preservation Commission approval was granted on October 22, 2014 through HPC Resolution # 31, Series of 2014. Land Use Approval(s) Received and Dates (Attach Final Ordinances or Resolutions) November 6, 2014 Effective Date of Development Order (Same as date of publication of notice of approval.) November 6,2017 Expiration Date of Development Order (The extension, reinstatement, exemption from expiration and revocation may be pursued in accordance with Section 26.308.010 of the City of Aspen Municipal Code.) Issued this 29th day of October, 2014, by the City of Aspen Community Development Director. (1 0<MASZ Chris BerkIon, Community Development Director Ill.A. MEMORANDUM TO: Aspen Historic Preservation Commission FROM: Amy Simon, Historic Preservation Officer RE: 101 E. Hallam- Minor Development and Temporary On-site Relocation, Continued Public Hearing DATE: October 22, 2014 SUMMARY: 101 E. Hallam is listed on the Aspen Inventory of Historic Landmark Sites and Structures. The site contains a Victorian era house and shed. Both buildings are constructed of tli brick, which is a small subset of the 19 century residential structures remaining in Aspen. The applicant is requesting Minor Development review to expand an existing non-historic addition to the house and to excavate a new basement. Setback variances are requested to legalize existing and proposed new conditions. The amount of new square footage involved in the project qualifies this as Minor Development, The Victorian house will not be lifted to construct the new basement; rather it will be left in place and underpinned. Nonetheless, this work is reviewed as Temporary Relocation. HPC reviewed this project on September 24th and continued it for restudy. The applicant was asked to unify the architecture of all existing and proposed alterations to the house. Staff finds that the restudy addresses HPC's direction. APPLICANT: Hallam LLC, represented by Forum Phi Architecture, applying with the consent of the current property owner, Patricia Gorman. PARCEL ID: 2735-124-37-001. ADDRESS: 101 E. Hallam, Lot A and the west 4.86' of Lot B, Block 65, City and Townsite of Aspen, Colorado. ZONING: R-6 MINOR DEVELOPMENT The procedure for a Minor Development Review is as follows. Staff reviews the submittal materials and prepares a report that analyzes the project's conformance with the design guidelines and other applicable Land Use Code Sections. This report is transmitted to the HPC with relevant information on the proposed project and a recommendation to continue, approve, disapprove or approve with conditions and the reasons for the recommendation. The HPC will review the application, the staff analysis report and the evidence presented at the hearing to determine the project's conformance with the City OJAspen Uistoric Preservation Design Guidelines. The HPC may approve, disapprove, approve with conditions, or continue 1 P1 111.A. the application to obtain additional information necessary to make a decision to approve or deny. If the application is approved, the HPC shall issue a Certijicate of Appropriateness and the Community Development Director shall issue a Development Order. The HPC decision shall be jinal unless appealed by the applicant or a landowner within three hundred (300) feet of the subject property in accordance with the procedures set forth in Chapter 26.316. Staff Response: In 1982, the original hipped roof on the subject house was demolished and replaced with a new gable roof with multiple dormers. The original front porch was also demolished and replaced in a different configuration. The work was not under HPC's authority at the time. The photos below compare the west side of 101 E. Hallam in 1980 (left photo) to a more recent photo of the west side ofthe house (right photo). 'f f . - ~_22Â« J7/1 ./ - J - - N _A Â·Â·t~.6. 19 4. . 11' 1 11 1 \A < 611 1, .Ii;il 101 E. Hallam and 105 E. Hallam, the site directly to the east, were built by the Brown/Cowenhoven family, in 1885. The houses were originally mirror images of each other, and a brick shed along the alley spans across the property line between the two neighbors. The photos below compare the historic front of 105 E. Hallam to the current front of 101 E. Hallam. Fal~gfi- : ~LI 4Â·Fie-r~. 4Â£ 11\11. 4--= => â€ž.~10 lul All 80. 47-- 37 "PE . .. g:'Â·014:.i,9 pi 14*~(W. h -'404 - f 44# 0 N!)= 1414 tw- ,- 1 7791]11 0 t. 2 1.- 4,/W 1 la#... , ./4 hi , 1 , i ':11.'fo. 1:6 .1 ; B</4 5 ....... Â· u ./1. .. ~ 1 4~1 \)01,"I 1 1 '.t ft> 1 @ME' ~ , iJ N 2. .4<5 A '4 ....Wjj0" 2 P2 111.A. Before the HPC application was submitted, staff encouraged the potential new buyer of this site to restore the original roof form, which is an action that would likely earn the 500 square foot floor area bonus. That is exactly the sort of purpose for which HPC has authority to allow this incentive. Restoration of the roof is a significant cost undertaking and would displace some of the living area that exists in the gable on the home today. The applicant chose not to request the bonus and not to disturb the historic area of the home. The north and south liinits of the historic structure lie between the gridlines labeled "D" and "F" on the applicant's plans and elevations. South of gridline "D," (towards the alley) the applicant proposes to retain some of the existing non-historic addition, but add a garage on the ground floor, and lengthen and widen the upper floor living space. There is currently no parking area provided on this site. The applicant is not required to add a garage, but doing so decreases demand on street parking. The previous proposal included a contemporary roof forin and materials that were viewed by staff and HPC as too much of a departure from the existing. That proposal is depicted below. ! i r s q .....c. I ---J EX-~71 1 PROID ...81..:... + 1 1 1 1 1 ... ' .E:EREE:==EE:===51,Â·,pce,râ€¢Mou~.=EN~U,EmE:EEE=:la.r:.câ€¢E,giE=NE:EigNiENEENEmE:EliENE=, i j --T-=9 1 , 1*ElEENENES,Emiâ€¢TOR=.9EiESM,VA,lk<96:EFE...ToRIDGE MNEERE;EN;E;ESS,Se,28 14.TOROGE 1 1 .1 1 3 PO'IT FMOâ€¢ I EAVE TO 'fDGE EAVETO -. r I 3/3,4-:â€ž. 1 J L ./.E-3.]3~ R DGE 1 1.3 ........ 1 ...,TOMIDal -1'.0,01**CAT,) 15 16. 1,1 Mci:. â€¢ OF STRUC--qi 3/ TO R:C I .r i t lin 1 J , Exiant,Gs-EmE/11â‚¬Mric ! Exls-Nis./.9all Pâ€¢NOPAL.W~Â©OW; -0 *rN $ Â·-rerr-kE Â·TC REM~I ~ ~ â€¢90 2-)01 40*0'. 4* 2-CO 4% 5 1 1 1 1 1 i I i The revised proposal is a gable roofed form, sided with wood shingles, seen below. I RIO --------------- .1 r I .. J L r - '01 1-n LL-2 - A- _~L_==.~-1=2 =Z- - --- - -- --- - 2 -I--1 3 P3 8116 1319 111.A. The applicant plans to change the siding on the non-historic roof dormers from fishscale shingles to cut shingles, matching the addition and helping to distinguish the original house from the later phases. The applicant is removing numerous encroachments into the right-of-way along Garmisch, and moving the existing fence to the property lines. This will help to define the original size of the property. The historic shed, which has been covered partially with wood siding and stucco, will be restored. Staff finds that the revised project meets the design guidelines. SETBACK VARIANCES The applicant requests setback variances on the east, west, rear and combined yards for existing and new construction. In granting a variance, the HPC must make a finding that such a variance: a. Is similar to the pattern, features and character ofthe historic property or district; and/or b. Enhances or mitigates an adverse impact to the historic significance or architectural character of the historic property, an adjoining designated historic property or historic district. Staff Response: The historic house encroaches by about 6" into the west sideyard setback, and the existing rear addition encroaches about 6" into the east sideyard. The applicant proposes that the new basement follow the existing foundations, therefore sideyard and combined sideyard variances are needed. The shed has previously received variances, but to clarify the allowances, HPC should grant a 0' east sideyard and 0' rear yard setback requirement for this structure. RELOCATION The intent of this Chapter is to preserve designated historic properties in their original locations as much of their significance is embodied in their setting and physical relationship to their surroundings as well as their association with events and people with ties to particular site. However, it is recognized that occasionally the relocation of a property may be appropriate as it provides an alternative to demolition or because it only has a limited impact on tile attributes that make it significant. The following standards apply for relocating a historic property as per Section 26.415.090.C of the Municipal Code: C. Standards for the Relocation of Designated Properties 4 P4 111.A. Relocation for a building, structure or object will be approved if it is determined that it meets any one of the following standards: 1. It is considered a non-contributing element of a historic district and its relocation will not affect the character of the historic district; 2!: 2. It does not contribute to the overall character of the historic district or parcel on which it is located and its relocation will not have an adverse impact on the historic district or property; or 3. The owner has obtained a Certificate of Economic Hardship; 2[ 4. The relocation activity is demonstrated to be an acceptable preservation method given the character and integrity of the building, structure or object and its move will not adversely affect the integrity of the historic district in which it was originally located or diminish the historic, architectural or aesthetic relationships of adjacent designated properties; and Additionally, for approval to relocate all of the following criteria must be met: 1. It has been determined that the building, structure or object is capable of withstanding the physical impacts of relocation; and 2. An appropriate receiving site has been identified; and 3. An acceptable plan has been submitted providing for the safe relocation, repair and preservation of the building, structure or object including the provision of the necessary financial security. Staff Response: The existing house will remain where it is during this project. The historic house will gradually be underpinned with a new foundation and the full basement excavation will be completed. Although the house will not be lifted and moved during excavation, the standard assurances that the structure will be protected are required. A memo from a structural engineer addressing the preservation concerns must be submitted with the building permit. DECISION MAKING OPTIONS: The HPC may: â€¢ approve the application, â€¢ approve the application with conditions, â€¢ disapprove the application, or â€¢ continue the application to a date certain to obtain additional information necessary to make a decision to approve or deny. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that Minor Development and Temporary Relocation approval be granted for 101 E. Hallam with the following conditions: 5 P5 111.A. l. HPC hereby reduces the east sideyard requirement by 6", the west sideyard requirement by 6" and the combined sideyard requirement by 1." The sideyard and rear yard setback requirements for the historic shed are waived. 2. A report from a licensed engineer, architect or housemover demonstrating that the structure can be moved must be submitted with the building permit application in addition to a bond, letter of credit or cashier's check in the amount of $30,000 to ensure the safe relocation. 3. The development approvals granted herein shall constitute a site-specific development plan vested for a period of three (3) years from the date of issuance of a development order. However, any failure to abide by any of the terms and conditions attendant to this approval shall result in the forfeiture of said vested property rights. Unless otherwise exempted or extended, failure to properly record all plats and agreements required to be recorded, as specified herein, within 180 days of the effective date of the development order shall also result in the forfeiture of said vested property rights and shall render the development order void within the meaning of Section 26.104.050 (Void permits). Zoning that is not part of the approved site-specific development plan shall not result in the creation of a vested property right. No later than fourteen ( 14) days following final approval of all requisite reviews necessary to obtain a development order as set forth in this Ordinance, the City Clerk shall cause to be published in a newspaper of general circulation within the jurisdictional boundaries of the City of Aspen, a notice advising the general public of the approval of a site specific development plan and creation of a vested property right pursuant to this Title. Such notice shall be substantially in the following form: Notice is hereby given to the general public of the approval of a site specific development plan, and the creation of a vested property right, valid for a period of three (3) years, pursuant to the Land Use Code of the City of Aspen and Title 24, Article 68, Colorado Revised Statutes, pertaining to the following described property: 101 E. Hallam, Lot A and the west 4.86' of Lot B, Block 65, City and Townsite of Aspen, Colorado. Nothing in this approval shall exempt the development order from subsequent reviews and approvals required by this approval of the general rules, regulations and ordinances or the City of Aspen provided that such reviews and approvals are not inconsistent with this approval. The approval granted hereby shall be subject to all rights of referendum and judicial review; the period of time permitted by law for the exercise of such rights shall not begin to run until the date of publication of the notice of final development approval as required under Section 26.304.070(A). The rights of referendum shall be limited as set forth in the Colorado Constitution and the Aspen Home Rule Charter. Exhibits: Resolution # , Series of 2014 A. Design Guidelines B. September 24th minutes C. Application 6 P6 111.A. "Exhibit A, Relevant Design Guidelines, 101 E. Hallam" 8.1 If an existing secondary structure is historically significant, then it must be preserved. u When treating a historic secondary building, respect its character-defining features. These include its primary and roof materials, roof form, windows, doors and architectural details. u If a secondary structure is not historically significant, then its preservation is optional. 8.3 Avoid attaching a garage or carport to the primary structure. o Traditionally, a garage was sited as a separate structure at the rear of the lot; this pattern should be maintained. Any proposal to attach an accessory structure is reviewed on a case- by-case basis. 4 A garage door should be compatible with the character of the historic structure. A wood-clad hinged door is preferred on a historic structure. If an overhead door is used, the materials should match that of the secondary structure. If the existing doors are hinged, they can be adapted with an automatic opener. 10.3 Design a new addition such that one's ability to interpret the historic character of the primary building is maintained. o A new addition that creates ati appearance inconsistent with the historic character of the primary building is inappropriate. o An addition that seeks to imply an earlier period than that of the primary building also is inappropriate. u An addition that seeks to imply an inaccurate variation of the primary building's historic style should be avoided. a An addition that covers historically significant features is inappropriate. 10.4 Design a new addition to be recognized as a product of its own time. u An addition should be made distinguishable from the historic building, while also remaining visually compatible with these earlier features. u A change in setbacks ofthe addition from the historic building, a subtle change in material or a differentiation between historic, and more current styles are all techniques that may be considered to help define a change from old to new construction. 10.6 Design an addition to be compatible in size and scale with the main building. u An addition that is lower than or similar to the height of the primary building is preferred. 10.8 Place an addition at the rear of a building or set it back from the front to minimize the visual impact on the historic structure and to allow the original proportions and character to remain prominent. o Locating an addition at the front of a structure is inappropriate. 1 Additional floor area may also be located under the building in a basement which will not alter the exterior mass of a building. u Set back an addition from primary facades in order to allow tlie original proportions and character to remain prominent. A minimum setback of 10 feet on primary structures is recommended. 7 P7 06033 111.A. 10.9 Roof forms should be similar to those of the historic building. o Typically, gable, hip and shed roofs are appropriate. o Flat roofs are generally inappropriate for additions on residential structures with sloped roofs. 10.11 On a new addition, use exterior materials that are compatible with the historic materials of the primary building. u The new materials should be either similar or subordinate to the original materials. 8 P8 111.A. A RESOLUTION OF THE ASPEN HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION APPROVING MINOR DEVELOPMENT AND TEMPORARY RELOCATION FOR 101 E. HALLAM, LOT A AND THE WEST 4.86' OF LOT B, BLOCK 65, CITY AND TOWNSITE OF ASPEN, COLORADO RESOLUTION #_, SERIES OF 2014 PARCEL ID: 2735-124-37-001 WHEREAS, the applicant, Hallam LLC, represented by Forum Phi Architecture, and applying with the consent of the current property owner, Patricia Gorman. submitted an application requesting Minor Development and Temporary Relocation review for the property located at 101 E. Hallam, Lot A and the west 4.86' of Lot B, Block 65, City and Townsite of Aspen, Colorado; and WHEREAS, Community Development Department staff reviewed the application for compliance with the applicable review standards and recommended approval of Minor Development and Temporary Relocation with conditions; and, WHEREAS, the Aspen Historic Preservation Commission has reviewed and considered the development proposal under the applicable provisions of the Municipal Code as identified herein, has reviewed and considered the recommendation of the Community Development Director, and has taken and considered public comment at a duly noticed public hearing on October 22,2014; and WHEREAS, the City of Aspen Historic Preservation Commission finds that the development proposal meets all applicable review criteria and that the approval of the request is consistent with the goals and objectives ofthe Land Use Code; and, WHEREAS, the Historic Preservation Commission approves the application with conditions; by a vote of to . NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED: That HPC grants Minor Development and Temporary Relocation approval for the property located at 101 E. Hallam, with the following conditions: 1. 1-1PC hereby reduces the east sideyard requirement by 6", the west sideyard requirement ., by 6" and the combined sideyard requirement by 1. The sideyard and rear yard setback requirements for the historic shed are waived. 2. A report from a licensed engineer, architect or housemover demonstrating that the structure can be moved must be submitted with the building permit application in addition to a bond, letter of credit or cashier's check in the amount of $30,000 to ensure the safe relocation. 3. The development approvals granted herein shall constitute a site-specific development plan vested for a period of three (3) years from the date of issuance of a development order. However, any failure to abide by any of the terms and conditions attendant to this approval shall result in the forfeiture of said vested property rights. Unless otherwise P9 111.A. exempted or extended, failure to properly record all plats and agreements required to be recorded, as specified herein, within 180 days of the effective date of the development order shall also result in the forfeiture of said vested property rights and shall render the development order void within the meaning of Section 26.104.050 (Void permits). Zoning that is not part of the approved site-specific development plan shall not result in the creation of a vested property right. No later than fourteen (14) days following final approval of all requisite reviews necessary to obtain a development order as set forth in this Ordinance, the City Clerk shall cause to be published in a newspaper of general circulation within the jurisdictional boundaries of the City of Aspen, a notice advising the general public of the approval of a site specific development plan and creation of a vested property right pursuant to this Title. Such notice shall be substantially in the following form: Notice is hereby given to the general public of the approval of a site specific development plan, and the creation of a vested property right, valid for a period of three (3) years, pursuant to the Land Use Code of the City of Aspen and Title 24, Article 68, Colorado Revised Statutes, pertaining to the following described property: 101 E. Hallam, Lot A and the west 4.86' of Lot B, Block 65, City and Townsite of Aspen, Colorado. Nothing in this approval shall exempt the development order from subsequent reviews and approvals required by this approval of the general rules, regulations and ordinances or the City of Aspen provided that such reviews and approvals are not inconsistent with this approval. The approval granted hereby shall be subject to all rights of referendum and judicial review; the period of time permitted by law for the exercise of such rights shall not begin to run until the date of publication of the notice of final development approval as required under Section 26.304.070(A). The rights of referendum shall be limited as set forth in the Colorado Constitution and the Aspen Home Rule Charter. APPROVED BY THE COMMISSION at its regular meeting on the 22nd day of October, 2014. Jay Maytin, Chair Approved as to Form: Debbie Quinn, Assistant City Attorney ATTEST: Kathy Strickland, Chief Deputy Clerk P10 111.A. ASPEN HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION MINUTES OF SEPTEMBER 24, 2014 101 E. Hallam St. - Minor Development and Temporary On-site Relocation, Public Hearing. Public Notice - Exhibit I Amy said this is a corner lot in the West End right next to the Yellow Brick School. It is a little bigger than 3,000 square feet. It is zoned R-6 and it has th a 19 century home on it and a shed on the back. ~%his is one of a pair of houses that was built by the Cowenhoven/Brow#26ily in 1885. In the 1980's the original hipped roof was pulled offÂ· the house and a gabled roof put on which is a totally different shape and 9fknged the character of the house and caused the removal of the frte porch and d new porch was added. The base o f the house which is brick.*the original and there aren't many brick miner's homes in town. The do*nprs are new construction. The proposal is to re-work an addition that affeady exists on the backiiand it will expand the size ofthe additi,~pmewhat andithey want to add alingle stall garage. A basement will be *7~Vated under the existing Victorian and there will be underpinning. Staff strukgled with the addition because we are not starting from scratch., We want this projectto do whatever is possible to 4 1 Ef 'AW make the historiÂ¢tbuillding have mdre integrity than it does now. The plan is . to remodel the* addition particularly dii the upper floor where the master bedroom is and the'bedroom will be expanded. We suggested that this is an 111,4...4, opportun*$to make home;,kind of brealdÂ¥ connector to define where the histo#b61!ding ends andthe new construction begins. We were concerned to not see that in the design. This is a corner lot and everything that is done here isivisibly exposed. Staff recommends a restudy. There are a number of things that have been constructed);on the public property particularly on the side o f the house that are represented as staying and they cannot stay. The Engineering Dept. will not issue an encroachment license. There is fencing, a patio and a parking space in the right-of-way that has to go away. In digging the basement some setback violations have occurred and staff recommends that all new work complies with the setbacks. Steev Wilson Steev said the first floor and the front door are probably the only historic elements. The roof in its entirety has been replaced. We did look at putting the roof back on but there would be loss o f room on the second floor. The trellis and parking space have been removed. The intent is to add a mudroom, pantry and garage on the lower level. We aren't asking for Pll $11 111.A. ASPEN HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION MINUTES OF SEPTEMBER 24, 2014 variances on this level. On the upper level the proposal is to add a larger master bedroom. We are not touching the actual historic house just the 1982 addition. The changes will make the house more livable. We are sliding the basement under the entire structure matching the foundation wall all the way down. There will be minimum size light wells and they will be grated. The existing addition has a matching ridge height and is in character with the 1982 addition. We are telling the story as the building evolves with the additions. 9,1. 4. Fl: 4. T'IN: Steev said we are proposing three different roo f options. On the first option we are taking a saw tooth seried of gables turning them into one single shed form and distinguishing them #om the 1982 addition. We have been successful before with modern additions to historic homes. We are looking at horizontal wood for the addition. On the second roof option we tried to get separation from the historic structure moving the gable forward. . t'1111:13. .......1 1,L.11 ~ ! 51:111;:1: 1, On the third option it is verysimple. We are proposing a shallow gable. 11:1!0,11!!.1,11:11.i.... i Steev clarified that option one 12 the ihVerted shed. Option two is a small shed intersecting gable and option three is'ksimple low sloped roof. AI'l' 0 14.4111?,1 1. .%11 il....r ' Amy clarified that the new hddition is 250 square feet. +,6.t: ~ VPD 4 1 I 9 Chairperson, Jay Maytin opened the public hearing. lili:111; '11 1â€¢FllÂ·ItÂ· . IIi lilli'+ :; 11. .1 .1 A Wendelyn Whitm'&n said she is a mediary between the owner and new buyer. I am'speaking on behalf ofthe current owners. The project across the alley got a massive contemporary strubture that blocked their views. They said this is a very conservativÂ¢plan and project relative to what got approved behind them.4 4* 4... '11#41 2/. Steev pointed out that, the shed out building will be restored to its original brick. Chairperson, Jay Maytin closed the public hearing. Jay identified the issues: Significantly altered historic resource Lack of a connector Roof form 2 P12 111.A. ASPEN HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION MINUTES OF SEPTEMBER 24, 2014 Patrick said the un-historic roof form was put on in 1982 and now they want to continue the un-historic pattern of the gable rather than a shed roof. There is also concern about the connected garage. Amy said of the options given option #2 has a better form. There is no real answer but maybe it should be simple. There is a guideline that says detached garages are preferred and that is something HPC can discuss. They alley building and garage might conflict withleach other. Maybe the .G1111,AIN garage should be more internal on the lot and letme alley building stand out. d,%11 , John said option #2 is the most applicable for' our guidelines. Willis said this a difficult problem bedause there is little opportunity to do anything. It needs to be subservient. -'The introduction of rid* materials is alien to the existing building. The additiomis becoming piece number 3 and rlr' . ~ i.':Ii .1 you end up with a trifecta wl*# ends up bding~* hodge podge. You need dialogue between the 80's anitthe historic structure. Maybe the use of materials from the 80's would be appropriate. Â·:u :41:UNW~ .4.. :1!1 f -CteÂ¥*. j .111"1215' t. ' Nora thanked the applic#nt for solving thÂ¢*bblems of the variance, light well and garage#:You already have ardisruptive rdkource and it is being disrupted further and it is on a corner timt you see all the time. I would like to see the real roof comq back but if it doesn't happen you need something that adeast speaks to it instead of confusing it more. 111:1 11 lili 1 .1 I 1. :41:1:':1. 141': ~828'i.1. L Willikrsaid the spatiA{ Organization is fine. It shouldn't look like there are three episodes of construction.4 1~. 10 :RE Jay said he is also struggling because there is so little left of the historic house. It is difficult to read because the porch is new and everything above the first floor is new.: We need to try and clean up the second floor and not introduce more confusion. Option #2 tries to fit the guidelines and the roof forms seem to work the best. We appreciate the non-conformity being cleaned up and retaining the shed but the new construction should speak with the 1982 addition more so than it does right now. We should also see the materials and lighting. MOTION: Jay moved to continue 101 E. Hallam St to October 22nd; second by Patrick. All in favor, motion carried. 3 P13 111.A. CITY OF ASPEN PRE-APPLICATION CONFERENCE SUMMARY PLANNER: Amy Simon, (970) 429-2758 DATE: 5.20.14 PROJECT: 101 E. Hallam REPRESENTATIVE: Steev Wilson, Forum Phi DESCRIPTION: 101 E. Hallam is listed on the Aspen Inventory of Historic Landmark Sites and Structures. The lot is approximately 3,486 square feet in size and is zoned R-6. The maximum allowable floor area is approximately 2,536 square feet. A possible new purchaser would like to maximize floor area on the site, excavating a basement and constructing a new addition at the rear of the original house. Due to site constraints, a request to demolish a historic shed along the alley might be made. The shed straddles a property line, so work on this structure might affect the adjacent property owner. The project is likely to include requests for setback variances, a floor area bonus, and a possible reduction of on- site parking requirements to one space rather than two. HPC has the authority to consider variances if they allow for better placement of the new construction relative to the historic building. A floor area bonus of up to 500 square feet can be granted for an outstanding preservation effort. A preliminary worksession is required prior to any hearing for any bonus request. Using historic maps and some older photographs, it has become apparent that the roof of the original building has been demolished in the past and replaced with a gable form and dormers that are not original. The original front porch has also been removed and replaced. HPC would likely seek full restoration of the design of the building in order to grant the bonus. The house to the east appears to be a mirror image of the original design at 101 E. Hallam. Demolition of the shed along the alley may be in conflict with the award of bonus floor area, however it may be an acceptable trade-off considering other restoration potential. HPC will conduct a Temporary Relocation review if needed to ensure that the excavation technique for a basement below the Victorian is carefully planned. Design review for any proposed new construction or restoration work will be according to the Historic Preservation Design Guidelines and the Residential Design Standards. The review is a two-step process, with a Conceptual application (mass, site plan, etc.) and a Final application (materials, landscape, lighting.) The purchaser may have unused floor area available to be converted into Transferable Development Rights. Creation of TDRs is reviewed by City Council. The property currently has some features that encroach onto the public right of way along Garmisch Street; a fence and a gazebo. These features must be removed or can be granted temporary encroachment licenses if deemed appropriate by the City of Aspen Engineering Department. Land Use Code Section(s) 26.304 Common Development Review Procedures 26.410 Residential Design Standards 26.415.070.D Certificate of appropriateness for Major development 26.415.080 Demolition of designated historic properties or properties within a historic district 1 P14 111.A. 26.415.090 Relocation of designated historic properties. 26.415.110 Benefits 26.535 Transferrable Development Rights 26.575.020 Calculations and Measurements 26.710 R-6 Zone District Land Use Code (including all code sections cited above): http://www.aspenpitkin.com/Departments/Community-Development/Planning-and-Zoning/Title-26-Land-Use- Code/ HPC Design Guidelines: http://www.aspenpitkin.com/Departments/Community-Development/Historic-Preservation/Historic-Properties/ HPC application: http://www.aspenpitkin.com/Portals/0/docs/Citv/Comdev/Apps%20and%20Fees/2011%20Historic%20Land %20Use%20App%20Form.pdf Land Use application: http://www.aspenpitkin.com/Portals/0/docs/City/Comdev/Apps%20and%20Fees/2013%20Iand%20use %20app%20form.pdf Review by: Staff for complete application HPC for major development and bonuses City Council for TDRs Public Hearing: Yes, at HPC and Council Second Reading Planning Fees: $1,950 for 6 billable hours (additional or less billable hours are at $325 per hour) at Conceptual application $1,950 for 6 billable hours (additional or less billable hours are at $325 per hour) at Final application $1,300 for 4 billable hours (additional or less billable hours are at $325 per hour) at TDR application Referral Agency Fees: $0 Total Deposit: $1,950 at Conceptual $1,950 at Final $1,300 at TDR application Total Number of Application Copies: 12 at Conceptual and Final, 12 for Council To apply, please submit 1 copy at each submission of: Il Signed fee agreement with payment. 0 Applicant's name, address and telephone number in a letter signed by the applicant which states the name, address and telephone number of the representative authorized to act on behalf of the applicant. 0 Street address and legal description of the parcel on which development is proposed to occur Il Disclosure of ownership, consisting of a current certificate from a title insurance company, or attorney licensed to practice in the State of Colorado, listing the names of all owners of the property, and all mortgages, judgments, liens, easements, contracts and agreements affecting the parcel, and demonstrating the owner's right to apply for the Development Application. 0 List of adjacent property owners within 300' for public hearing. P15 111.A. Il Pre-application Conference Summary. m Prior approvals. And 12 copies at Conceptual and Final of: Il Completed HPC Land Use application. m An 8 1/2" by 11"vicinity map locating the parcel within the City of Aspen. Â£ Site improvement survey including topography and vegetation showing the current status, including all easements and vacated rights of way, of the parcel certified by a registered land surveyor, licensed in the state of Colorado. m Scaled drawings of all proposed structure(s) or addition(s) depicting their form, including their height, massing, scale, proportions and roof plan; and the primary features of all elevations. At Final review, provide a lighting plan and landscape plan. Il Preliminary selection of primary building materials to be used in construction represented by samples and/or photographs at Conceptual. Final material selections to be provided at Final review. Â£ Supplemental materials to provide a visual description of the context surrounding the designated historic property or historic district including at least one (1) of the following: diagrams, maps, photographs, models or streetscape elevations. m A written description of the proposal and an explanation of how the proposed development, and any requested variances or bonuses, complies with the review standards and design guidelines relevant to the application. 0 Verification that the proposal complies with Chapter 26.410, Residential design standards or a written request for a variance from any standard that is not being met. m A signed permission letter from the current property owner of 105 E. Hallam regarding potential alterations to the portion of the shed on the applicant's property. And 12 copies at TDR application of: Il Completed Land Use Application. m An 8 1/2" x 11"vicinity map locating the subject parcel within the City of Aspen. El A site improvement survey of the sending site depicting existing natural and man-made features and all legal easements and restrictions m Existing and proposed elevations and site plan. 0 Existing and proposed floor area calculations. Il A written description of the proposal and an explanation in written, graphic, or model form of how the proposed development complies with the review standards relevant to the development application. U A notarized affidavit from the sending site property owner signifying acknowledgment of the following: o A deed restriction will permanently encumber the sending site and restrict that property's development rights to below that allowed by right by zoning according to the number of historic TDR certificates established from that sending site. o For each certificate of development right issued by the City for the particular sending site, that property shall be allowed two hundred and fifty (250) square feet less of floor area, as permitted according to the property's zoning, as amended. o The sending site property owner shall have no authority over the manner in which the certificate of development right is used by subsequent owners of the historic TDR certificate. U Proposed TDR deed restriction for the sending site. Applicants are advised that building plans will be required to meet the International Building Code as adopted by the City of Aspen, the Federal Fair Housing Act, and CRS 9.5.112. Please make sure that your application submittal addresses these building-related and accessibility regulations. You may contact the Building Department at 920-5090 for additional information. P16 111.A. Disclaimer: The foregoing summary is advisory in nature only and is not binding on the City. The summary is based on current zoning, which is subject to change in the future, and upon factual representations that may or may not be accurate. The summary does not create a legal or vested right. P17 111.A. COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT .. Agreement to Pay Application Fees An agreement between the City of Aspen ("City") and Property Steev Wilson Phone No.: 970-279-4109 Owner ("1") on behalf of Hallam LLC Email: swilson@forumphi.com Address of Billing Property: 101 E Hallam Street Address: 715 W Main St., Ste 204 (subject of Aspen, CO 81611 Aspen, CO 81611 (send bills here) application) I understand that the City has adopted, via Ordinance No. , Series of 2011, review fees for Land Use applications and the payment of these fees is a condition precedent to determining application completeness. I understand that as the property owner that I am responsible for paying all fees for this development application. For flat fees and referral fees: I agree to pay the following fees for the services indicated. I understand that these flat fees are non-refundable. $ flat fee for $ flat fee for S flat fee for $ flat fee for For deposit cases only: The City and I understand that because of the size, nature or scope of the proposed project, it is not possible at this time to know the full extent or total costs involved in processing the application. 1 understand that additional costs over and above the deposit may accrue. I understand and agree that it is impracticable for City staff to complete processing, review, and presentation of sufficient information to enable legally required findings to be made for project consideration, unless invoices are paid in full. The City and I understand and agree that invoices mailed by the City to the above listed billing address and not returned to the City shall be considered by the City as being received by me. I agree to remit payment within 30 days of presentation of an invoice by the City for such services. I have read, understood, and agree to the Land Use Review Fee Policy including consequences for non-payment. I agree to pay the following initial deposit amounts for the specified hours of staff time. I understand that payment of a deposit does not render an application complete or compliant with approval criteria. If actual recorded costs exceed the initial deposit, I agree to pay additional monthly billings to the City to reimburse the City for the processing of my application at the hourly rates hereinafter stated. S 1,950 deposit for 6 hours of Community Development Department staff time. Additional time above the deposit amount will be billed at $315 per hour. $ deposit for hours of Engineering Department staff time. Additional time above the deposit amount will be billed at $265 per hour. City of Aspen: Property Owner: 7-Ve bi- - Chris Bendon Community Development Director Name: KT-EEV G)ILLOA) City Use: T\Ue. Aeâ‚¬-M irEor /oloA,EA- AGG.7r- Fees Due: $ 1,950 Received: $ November. 2011 City of Aspen I 130 S. Galena St. I (970) 920-5090 ' P18 111.A. ATTACHMENT 2 - Historic Preservation Land Use Application PROJECT: Name: Location: (Indicate street address, lot & block number or metes and bounds description of property) Parcel ID # (REQUIRED) APPLICANT: Nanne: Address: Phone #: Fax#: E-mail: REPRESENTATIVE: Name: Address: Phone #: Fax#: E-mail: TYPE OF APPLICATION: (please check all that apply): El Historic Designation El Relocation (temporary, on U Certificate of No Negative Effect El or off-site) [3 Certificate of Appropriateness ~ Demolition (total demolition) -Minor Historic Development 01 Historic Landmark Lot Split -Major Historic Development -Conceptual Historic Development -Final Historic Development -Substantial Amendment EXISTING CONDITIONS: (description ofexisting buildings, uses, previous approvals, etc.) PROPOSAL: (description ofproposed buildings, uses, modifications, etc.) Aspen Historic Preservation Land Use Application Requirements, Updated: May 29,2007 P19 EEEU 111.A. General Information Please check the appropriate boxes below and submit this page along with your application. This information will help us review your plans and, if necessary, coordinate with other agencies that may be involved. YES NO J El Does the work you are planning include exterior work; including additions, demolitions, new construction, remodeling, rehabilitation or restoration? E E Does the work you are planning include interior work; including remodeling, rehabilitation, or restoration? U 0 Do you plan other future changes or improvements that could be reviewed at this time? El L] In addition to City of Aspen approval for a Certificate of Appropriateness or No Negative Effect and a building permit, are you seeking to meet the Secretary of the Interior's Standards for Rehabilitation or restoration ofa National Register of Historic Places property in order to qualify for state or federal tax credits? E U If yes, are you seeking federal rehabilitation investment tax credits in conjunction with this project? (Only income producing properties listed on the National Register are eligible. Owner-occupied residential properties are not.) E If yes, are you seeking the Colorado State Income Tax Credit for Historical Preservation? Please check all City of Aspen Historic Preservation Benefits which you plan to use: E Rehabilitation Loan Fund El Conservation Easement Program H Dimensional Variances El Increased Density E] Historic Landmark Lot Split Ed Waiver of Park Dedication Fees [3 Conditional Uses U Exemption from Growth Management Quota System [3 Tax Credits Aspen Historic Preservation Land Use Application Requirements, Updated: May 29,2007 P20 111.A. ATTACHMENT 3 - Dimensional Requirements Form (Item #10 on the submittal requirements key. Not necessary for all projects.) Project: Applicant: Proj ect Location: Zone District: Lot Size: Lot Area: (For the purposes of calculating Floor Area, Lot Area may be reduced for areas within the high water mark, easements, and steep slopes. Please refer to the definition of Lot Area in the Municipal Code.) Commercial net leasable: Existing: Proposed: Number of residential units: Existing: Proposed: Number of bedrooms Existing: Proposed: Proposed % of demolition: DIMENSIONS: (write n/a where no requirement exists in the zone district) Floor Area: Existing: Allowable: Proposed: Height Principal Bldg.: Existing: Allowable: Proposed: Accessory Bldg.: Existing: Allowable: Proposed- On-Site parking: Existing: Required: Proposed: % Site coverage: Existing: Required: Proposed: % Open Space: Existing: Required: Proposed: Front Setback: Existing: Required: Proposed: Rear Setback: Existing: Required: Proposed: Combined Front/Rear: Indicate N. S. E. W Existing: Required: Proposed: Side Setback: Existing: Required: Proposed: Side Setback: Existing: Required: Proposed: Combined Sides: Existing: Required: Proposed: Distance between Existing: Required: Proposed: buildings: Existing non-conformities or encroachments and note ifencroachment licenses have been issued: Variations requested (identify the exact variances needed): Aspen Historic Preservation Land Use Application Requirements, Updated: May 29,2007 P21 111.A. ARCHITECTURE I INTERIORS I PLANNING FORUM PHI FORUMPHI.COM 7 5 W U:wn St I Ste 204 I Ai/Â·n. CO 8 16â€ž P 970 2794157 F: 266 7.70,5535 TO: Chris Bendon, Community Development Director FROM: Forum Phi RE: 101 E Hallam Street DATE: October 14,2014 Dear Director, Forum Phi requests your approval of an HPC Land Use Application based on the "temporary relocation" standards for a historic structure located at 101 E Hallam Street. The subject property is listed on the Aspen Inventory of Historic Landmark Sites and Structures. The single-family residence was previously remodeled with a non-historic addition in 1982. There will be a substantial subgrade/basement addition underneath the historic structure which will cause it to be temporarily shored in place. The existing non-historic main and upper level will be remodeled, in addition to a new garage located off the alley. The Land Use Application for Minor Development Review is complete per the City of Aspen Community Development Department's Historic Preservation Application Package. Sincerely, Steev Wilson, AIA P22 111.A. City of Aspen Review Standards Compliance 26.410.040. Residential Design Standards A. 5ite Design. 1. Building orientation. The lot is a corner lot and the existing street-facing facades are parallel to the intersection streets (Hallam Street and Garmisch Street) 2. Build-to lines. The lot is a comer lot and more than 60% of the facade is within five feet of the minimum setback 3. Fences. An existing wrought iron fence within the right-of-way will be relocated to the west and north property line. This fence is less than 42 inches. B. Building form. 1. Secondary mass. The lot contains an existing historic structure to remain that predates the residential design standards. C. Parking, garages and carports. 1. For all residential uses that have access from an alley or private road, the [listed] standards shall apply: The proposed garage door is a single stall door and is visible and accessed from the alley. 2. For all residential uses that have access only from a public street, the [listed] standards shall apply: The garage door is a single stall door and is accessed from an alley, therefore this section does not apply. D. Building elements. 1. Street oriented entrance and principal window. The existing historic house has a street-oriented entrance and a street-facing principal window to remain. a) The existing entry door to remain is no more than ten (10) feet back from the front- most wall of the building and is not taller than eight (8) feet. b) The existing front porch to remain is greater than 50 square feet with a minimum depth of six feet. The entry porch is one story in height. c) The existing street-facing facades contain significant groups of windows. 2. First story element. The lot contains an existing historic structure to remain that predates the residential design standards. 3. Windows. a) The existing and proposed street-facing windows do not span between nine and twelve feet above the finished floor. P23 111.A. b) The existing portion of the house contains three non-orthogonal windows on the west facade and one on the north facade, all existing to remain. The south facade contains two existing non-orthogonal windows to be removed and replaced with on non- orthogonal window in the gable end. 4. Lightwells. The proposed lightwells are recessed behind the front-most wall of the building and are not located on the street-facing facade. E. Context. 1. Materials. a) The quality of the existing and proposed exterior materials and their application is consistent on all sides of the building. b) The use of materials are true to their characteristics. Proposed materials will be approved at the HPC Minor Review, Continued for Restudy. c) There are no proposed highly reflective materials. Proposed materials will be approved at the HPC Final Review, Continued for Restudy. 2. Inflection. a) This parcel is less than six thousand (6,000) square feet therefore this section does not apply. P24 111.A. City of Aspen Historic Preservation Design Guidelines Introduction The property at 101 E Hallam Street is listed in the Aspen Inventory of Historic Landmark Sites and Structures. As required for submittal, this letter of compliance is for HPC Minor Review, continued for restudy after a hearing on September 24, 2014. Streetscape and Lot Features This project is located on Lot A, on the corner of Hallam Street and Garmisch Street. The lot encroaches 4.86 feet to the west into Lot B. The property received a variance in 1998 for "a four foot rear yard and a five foot side yard setback variance". The property has a grass planting strip from a fence at the property line to the street. A single brick sidewalk extends from Hallam Street to the front porch and jogs ninety-degrees to align with the front door. Two large conifer trees are located on either side of this walk. There is no public sidewalk to separate the planting strip from the property line. Another private walk extends from Garmisch Street to the west side of the house. A row of four Aspen trees line the fence along the property line on the Garmisch Street side. All existing trees on site will remain and any affected plantings will be reestablished. A three-foot wrought-iron fence currently in the right-of-way will be removed and relocated to border the property line along both the Hallam (west) and Garmisch Street (north) sides. The west and rear (southwest) portion of the lot has an existing six-foot non-historic wood fence surrounding a pergola and patio area, currently in the right-of-way. This pergola area and wood fence will be removed. The site does not have any historic retaining walls, and no new retaining walls are proposed at this time. There are ceiling-mounted sconces located under both the historic front porch and the side porch. A street lamp post is located at the corner of the Hallam and Garmisch Streets. All other proposed site lighting will be shielded. All streetscape features will be returned to existing conditions. Historic Building Materials The primary historic building material is brick, with a non-historic upper level addition of round sawn cedar shingle siding. The brick has been well-maintained and any areas requiring repair will be done in place. A portion of the non-historic 1982 addition will be replaced with new materials, primarily painted cedar shingle siding to match the proposed siding. The existing roof was remodeled as part of the non-historic addition. The proposed roof will be cedar shingle to match the 1982 addition. Any demolition to occur will be primarily interior and to non-historic portions of the exterior. Windows All historic windows on the existing structure are located on the lower level; the 1982 upper level addition is not historic. All historic windows maintain the original character, although it appears several have been previously replaced. The existing historic windows at the main level will remain unchanged and will receive proper maintenance where required. These windows are double hung type with brick arch tops and brick sills. All historic windows will receive repairs where required, with no changes to character-defining features. Replacement windows are not anticipated for the historic portions of the project. If P25 111.A. required, any replacements will preserve the historic character of openings, design, materials, size and proportion, and profile. Storm windows may be installed to enhance energy performance of the historic structure, but have not been proposed at this time. Doors The historic structure has two remaining historic glass paneled doors. The first is the primary entry facing Hallam Street; the second entry is on the west facade facing Garmisch Street. These doors will be maintained in order to preserve integrity, function, size, appearance, design and color. The historic doors will not be replaced and storm doors are not proposed at this time. A third historic entry is located on the east facade, but the historic door is no longer intact. This opening leads to a crawlspace access area. Porches The primary porch on the front facade was demolished and replaced in 1982. It will be maintained in its existing condition. A second covered entry on the west facade was added in 1982, is not historic, and will be maintained in its existing condition. The 1982 remodel also included the addition of a pergola structure and at-grade patio on the southwest portion of the property, within the city right-of-way. The pergola and patio area is surrounded by a six-foot non-historic wood fence. This pergola area and fence will be removed. Architectural Details Distinct architectural details exist on the historic structure, specifically the brick arches over historic windows and doors. These details represent those typical of the late 1800s and will be maintained and repaired only where required. Any repairs and/or replacements to historic features will be documented prior to submission of a building permit and construction. Roofs The existing roof structure was previously demolished and replaced in 1982 and is not historic. It appears no portion of the original historic roof remains intact. The existing roof structure will be maintained in its current condition, with repairs where required. Secondary Structures The property contains a secondary common building which abuts the alleyway and is shared between both properties at 101 Hallam and 105 Hallam. This structure appears to be historic, as it is shown on a Sanborn Insurance Map of Aspen from 1890. The structure is a one-story brick building that has been covered by clapboard siding on the north and west facades, and covered by concrete in other areas. The shake shingle roof has been previously replaced and will be maintained where required. The structure will be returned to its original brick condition and remodeled on the interior. Building Relocation & Foundations The proposed design includes the addition of a basement/lower level directly underneath the existing structure, following the footprint of the existing foundation. The location of the original structure will remain and will be shored in place while a basement with new foundation walls are constructed below. The new foundation will be similar in design and materials to the historic foundation. Two proposed lightwells will be added to the east side of the building, recessed behind the front facade. P26 111.A. Building Additions In the early 1980s, a second-level and addition was constructed on the historic structure. During this remodel, the historic roof was demolished and a full upper level with a new roof form was constructed, as well as an addition appended to the south. This previous addition will remain and be remodeled, with a small extension added. This proposed addition has been designed such that the character of the historic structure is maintained. The proposed addition is designed to be an extension of and compatible in style with the previous 1982 remodel. It is distinguishable from the historic structure with painted cedar shingle siding and a cedar shingle roof. The 1982 siding will also be replaced with this new cedar shingle siding. The roof of the proposed addition is also designed as an extension of the existing roof, with simple gable forms. All portions of this addition will be located to the rear of the historic structure and behind the primary street-facing facade. A garage is proposed to be added on the alley (south) side, as a direct extension of the 1982 addition. The garage maintains a five foot separation from the historic shed and is set back approximately ten feet from the alley. The garage door is designed as a wood-clad hinged door. Most of the new floor area will be located subgrade. The proposed floor area is approximately 2,526 square feet. This is below the maximum allowable FAR for the parcel (2,536 square feet). This project is not within the Main Street Historic District nor the Commercial Core Historic District, and does not involve a new primary structure on a historic parcel. General Guidelines The historic structure is constructed of brick with painted dark brown and dark tan accents of the porch and non-historic second story addition. The original accent colors will be researched and all attempts will be made to return the historic portion to its original. Any new color schemes chosen for the historic structure will be simple, coordinated, and consistent with the character of a Victorian built in the late 1800s. The proposed addition will also be coordinated with the historic scheme, while remaining distinguishable in color and material. Exterior lighting will be simple in form and detail. Existing lights on the historic structure will remain. Any proposed site lighting will be shielded and/or low intensity. Visual impacts from interior lighting will be subdued. The surface of the historic structure will be maintained, repaired, and cleaned where necessary. The methods used will be low impact and follow the recommendations of the preservation design guidelines. Any repainting methods will be planned carefully. Mechanical and service areas will be located within the proposed addition. All service areas will be visually blocked from the primary street facade. All facades of the historic structure will remain free of mechanical and service equipment. The proposed garage will be accessed from the existing alleyway via a paved driveway. A small parking area will be located on the driveway. The driveway will be screened by landscaping from the primary building facade. The project is a single-family residence and will not utilize any signage. P27 111.A. ATTORNEYS TITLE INSURANCE AGENCY OF ASPEN, LLC 715 WEST MAIN STREET, SUITE 202 ASPEN, COLORADO 81611 OWNERSHIP & ENCUMBRANCE REPORT This report is based on a search made of documents affecting the record title to the property described hereinafter, searched by legal description and by the names of the grantor or grantee. Consequently, the information as to record owner is taken from the most recent recorded Vesting Deed, and the information as to existing encumbrances reflects those documents of record which specifically described the subject property by legal description or which refer to the owner of the property which are filed by name only and do not include the legal description of the property. No information is furnished relative to easements, covenants, conditions and restrictions. This report does include the results of a search under the names of the property owner(s) in the general index. Liability of Attorneys Title Insurance Agency ofAspen, LLC under this Ownership and Encumbrance Report is limited to the fee received. Effective Date: June 25, 2014 Property Address: 101 East Hallam Street, Aspen, Colorado. Schedule No: R000798 Parcel No: 273512437001 Taxes: Taxes forthe year 2013 have been paid in full in the amount of: $7,065.20. Taxes for 2014 are not yet due or payable. Legal Description: Lot A and the Westerly 4.86 feet of Lot B, Block 65, City and Townsite of Aspen, Pitkin County, Colorado. Record Owner: Patricia Gorman The following liens were found affecting the subject property: Deed of Trust from James J. Gorman and Patricia Gorman to the Public Trustee of Pitkin County for the benefit of UBS Bank USA, to secure an indebtedness in the principal sum of $1,000,000.00, dated February 7, 2012, and recorded April 2,2012, as Reception No. 587904 Attorney* Title Insurance Agency of Aspen, LLC C )&121141 By: WMer Van AlstiI@ Authorized Agent TELEPHONE (970) 925-7328 A A A FACSIMILE (970) 925-7348 P28 111.A. CONSENT AND AUTHORIZATION TO REPRESENT JAMES AND PATRICIA GORMAN 101 E HALLAM STREET ASPEN, CO 81611 July 1, 2014 City of Aspen Community Development Department 130 South Galena Street, 3rd Floor 1 Aspen, Colorado 81611 101 E Hallam Street Dear Director, This letter shall serve as my approval for Hallam LLC (represented by Forum Phi) to apply for and submit land use applications, building permit applications, and subsequent documentation for the property at 101 E Hallam Street. I authorize Forum Phi to submit, represent and obtain materials on the behalf of the owner of 101 E Hallam. I hereby authorize Steev Wilson and Forum Phi to perform and submit documents related | to planning,_Building Permit Application, or to gain building file information on our behalf for the project located at 101 E Hallam. They may represent us during the application review and approval processes. They may act on our behalf, may sign on our behalf all applications and permits, and any documents required or ancillary thereto. Steev Wilson, Partner, AIA Forum Phi Architecture 715 W Main Street, Ste 204 Aspen, CO 81611 Sincerely, 1 0441 Patricia Gorman Date ~ ' 14 / ( 1.~ P29 111.A. CONSENT AND AUTHORIZATION TO REPRESENT HALLAM LLC 101 E HALLAM STREET ASPEN, CO 81611 June 4, 2014 City of Aspen Community Development Department 130 South Galena Street, 3rd Floor Aspen, Colorado 81611 101 E Hallam Street, Aspen, CO 81611 Dear Director, This letter shall serve as my approval for Forum Phi Architecture to submit, represent and obtain materials on my behalf. Hallam LLC hereby authorizes Steev Wilson and Forum Phi to submit Land Use Applications and Building Permit Application and documentation on my behalf for the project located at 101 E Hallam Street. They may represent me during the application review and approval processes. They may act on my behalf, may sign on my behalf all applicattons and permits, and any documents required or ancillary thereto. Steev Wilson, Partner, AIA Forum Phi Architecture 715 W Main Street, Ste 204 Aspen, CO 81611 Sincerely, /--LF vurr- 40 , Co , 1 (-f Hallan'AILC Date Mark Freidman, manager Hallam LLC P30 111.A. 4JJ li . 4 1 1 4:11'94 Â¢471 762- 94/ K. 1 rau $ 2 ' ., pR~Â·t 2-1.h-*L**Mt._ 1 C iid -f: Dpx#'5*Fiyvi#R$'N*-4.;'4pj t A. r.#+ 2- 44 g.ck Lel Â·Slill' I > & <.M "*U<27 1 / 4 ?ff>89 L 5..K*701 X9*1.--329Â¢i~ \ E te.} 61-2 tÂ»:22 1.- 1 l // f//A - . 41 +F--e / Â·'-f.:I n,ESA 1-- I h ~7-- Â» u Y*#TR S~ 244.k.,'414*Vj 424% 12/3~g -2, 3 1 1-1--Ill -dEYJ .4, , 8Lte;, , 4 /9 / r I-"1 --A v.ji.> If . ~ 11 rtftflÂ»-â€¢. -lj t:' ~liN j' /'14 Â· 12 ' i, p/#4-fly:*234j 4 ~ 6 r r.. ~=Me . F ik,%72 Sh,â€¢. L 49>jÂ©~vicia,y H.*lonc LotÂ»iti 34/jil 4 If. (.4/ 77- 1Â·lotal ~015*VI .~ + ena,1,# & '919'10" E-rip,ji - 1Â¥i'. / ..4- If j , ./:: - ty - J id 7 (i ~ râ„¢-t:# 8116Â»1 . 1 - 1~dP&< / T,uaâ€¢~V NalontoFMC<4 60,nme li Pt;0,2$C -~77.~;p, . '-2:h.8,4-' 1/ r -- fl 4 .Â£-1 Â·~ Â·~~NC'/ '~ ~ *~ ~~~ W BLEEKER ST- Bleak- 61 H,ul Lyl Â»1 , 1 6. U .'.C. -1 ,4. .' 1/ 4347 t.~-4 , 1 I.~ .1 ~ ~.4 ~ ~ I:Â»PL- 1 ' 'Â· CAÂ·Â£01 -- /45*ON.. p - -Â·N ft it<5' . SPA 4 4 ..,6. 4% .tt.l 11 2 1 0Â£,uu Jinc L.61 8Â¥11 ..4 -Â»4 2 -1.-~~ f ,#H~_.41.1 ~L;fifv,A.P._s~ .pul 2?jes'.~ 4 14:4',IC.-Â· -~ ,Â·'~ A .. *4Â«,N/F 2 ..... C. ,/ 14< /RÂ¥9AliÂ¢k:2 ~4~4 2/30///. ~>39 ' 4 ./ 5 05*ker MIMI Let Splil ~" , ifT i L / ,Le PUD k MI, 51,Â·a,g~ Viglenine Hiatc-G~t~~2261 ,'>Â¢Â·'Â©4if>.Â·' Pij ~ Lfj 1t,~~~Â·Â· 1 kit L.,t/444 WMBâ€ž Miti ; 7rb ff@'~9 Â· 4/4%~/ / '2=../I-\/ 4.-.d~ ~*<#814 0/-~.,1,>*52:/- f ARAINITRANS.# i./ 37~*I>ar - . 493~;I; .*MIi'.. J-1-k 91-94 ft@%3Â»0 - - 2..F-C 13/ / .7. *9 cc /1/>.1 - EN. P31 111.A. BJIA Â·\ tineral Es/cite Owner .Votic'e. By the certified mailing of notice. return receipt requested. to affected mineral estate owners by at least thirty 00) days prior to the date scheduled for the initial public hearing on the application of development. The names and addresses of mineral estate owners shall be those on the current tax records of Pitkin County. At a minimum. Subdivisions. PDs that create more than one lot. and new Planned Developments are subject to this notice requirement. N/A Rezoning or /ext amendment. Whenever the oilicial zoning district map is in any wa> to be changed or amended incidental to or as part of a general re\ ision ot this Title. or whenever the text of this Title is to be amended. whether such revision be made by repeal of this Title and enactment of a new land use regulation. or otherwise. the requirement of an accurate survey map or other sufficient legal description ott and the notice to and listing of names and addresses o f oHners of real property in the area of the proposed Cliange shall be waived, Houever. the proposed zoning map shall be available for public inspection in the planning agency during all business hours for fifteen (15) days prior to the public hearing on such amendments. 464--1AA- Signature rhe furegoilig -Affillavit 01.Notice.. Has ackno"ledued beic,re nle this (fi~\.01~3Â· of B-pfrpiber- .2014.by 3).\--0-â‚¬\~~ \N~,\50Â« WITNESS MY HAND AND OITICLÂ·\[. SEAL. ~ JENNIFER M.WRIGHT| 1 NOTARY PUBLIC I My cgl,+ission expires: ck\\L j \5 6)04 STATE OF COLORADO NOTARY ID #20134043266 , 1 1 -â‚¬2 UA _ l/ CkErnission Expires July 15,2017 | ~ / \. - <fi__ffraiy 'dfic - -tiI~~~~~ ATTACHMENTS AN APPLICABLE: â€¢COPY OF THE PUBLICATION â€¢PHOTOGRAPH OF THE POSTED NOTICE (SIGN) â€¢ LIST OF THE OWNERS AND GOVERNMENTAL AGENCIES NOTICED BY MAIL â€¢ APPLICANT CERTIFICATION OF MINERAL ESTAE OWNERS NOTICE AS REQUIRED BY C.R.S. Â§24-65.5-103.3 P39 111.A. \FFIDAVIT OF PUBLIC NOTICE REQUIRED BÂ¥ SECTION 26.304.060 (F), ASPEN LAND USE CODE ADDREÂ» OF PROPERTY: to| E UALLA-,A , Aspen, CO SCHEDULED PI BLIC HEARING DATE: WED. Seur 24 , 20 14 STATE OF COLORADO ) ) SS. Count, of Pitkin ) I. 6.raz v \Al lu60rd (name. please print) being or representing an Applicant to the City of Aspen. Colorado. hereby personall> certif> that I have complied with the public notice requirements of Section 26.304.060 (E) of the Aspen Land Use Code in the following manner: CKY Pith/ica/ion q/-notice. By the publication in the legal notice section ofan ollicial paper or a paper of general circulation in the Oily of Aspen at least fifteen (15) days prior to the public hearing. ,-1 copy ofthe publicalionis allitched hereto Pos/ing of notice: By posting of notice. which form was obtained from the Community Development Department. u hich was made of suitable. waterproof materials. uhich was not less than twenty-two (22) inches wide and twenty-sir (26) inches high. and #hich was composed of letters not less than one inch in height. Said notice was posted at least fifteen (15) da> s prior to the public hearing! on the q day of Sepr . 20 14 . to and including the date and time of the public hearing. A photograph ofthe posted notice (sign) is anached hereto. SW Ah,iling of nonce. By the mailing of a notice obtained from the Community Development Department. which contains the information described in Section 26.304.060(E)(2) ofthe Aspen Land Use Code. At least fifteen (15) days prior to the public hearing. notice was liand delivered or mailed by first class postage prepaid U.S. mail to all ouners of property ,\ ithin three hundred (300) feet of the properly subject to the development application. The names and addresses of propert> owners shall be those on the current tax records of Pitkin County tls they appeared no more than sixty (60) days prior to the date of the public hearing. .4 copy of' tile owners und governmental agencies xo noticed ix unached hereto. WA A'eighho,Â·hood Owreach: Applicant attests that neighborhood outreach. summarized and attached. was conducted prior to the lirst public hearing as required in Section 26.304.035. Neighborhood Outreach. .Â·1 com' 0/ /he neighborhood outreach summary, including the method ofpublic notification und a copy qt uny documentation that was presented to the ptiblic is attached hereto. (contliiwed on nexi page) P38 111.A. 111 WEST FRANCIS LLC 120 EAST MAIN PARTNERS LLC BRADY WILLIAM JB 111 28 ROCK RIDGE AVE 120 E MAIN ST 14671 FIELDSTONE DR GREENWICH, CT 06831 ASPEN, CO 81611 SARATOGA, CA 95070 BROCKWAY LEXIE CITY OF ASPEN COLLINS CINDA REV TRUST 7714 FISHER ISLAND DR 130 S GALENA ST 42 PARK LN FISHER ISLAND, FL 33109-0966 ASPEN, CO 81611 MINNEAPOLIS, MN 55416 CRAWFORD RANDALL & ABIGAIL DOMINGUE FAMILY TRUST DTJ LEGACY PROPERTIES LLC 124 N GARMISCH ST PO BOX 2293 202 W 19TH ST ASPEN, CO 81611 WINTER PARK, FL 32790 EL DORADO, AR 71730 ERWIN GREGORY D GARCIA STEVEN J GARMISCH LODGING LLC PO BOX 4470 120 N GARMISCH 110 W MAIN ST BASALT, CO 81621 ASPEN, CO 81611 ASPEN, CO 81611 GSW FAMILY INV LP HENRY FREDERICK B TRUST HOGUET CONSTANCE M 1320 HUNSICKER RD 100 W HALLAM ST 333 E 68TH ST LANCASTER, PA 17601 ASPEN, CO 81611 NEW YORK, NY 10065 JAMMB LLC JOHNSON RICHARD & MONTAE IMBT KRUMM DONALD PAUL REV TRUST 500 S DIXIE HWY STE 201 6820 BRADBURY PO BOX 874 CORAL GABLES, FL 33146 DALLAS, TX 75230 ASPEN, CO 81612 LANDIS CAROLYN MOUNTAIN STATE PROPERTIES LLC PARDUBA JIRI 128 N GARMISCH ST 715 10TH ST SOUTH 116 N GARMISCH ST ASPEN, CO 81611 NAPLES, FL 34102 ASPEN, CO 81612 PENN PAUL E & SUSAN W RODNEY JOHN W ROSE BRANDON 3830 E 79TH ST 8536 N GOLF DR 625 MT HOPE RD INDIANAPOLIS, IN 46260-3457 PARADISE VALLEY, AZ 85253 WHARTON, NJ 07885 SARDY HOUSE NEW LLC SPEARS NANCY M WOLKENMUTH EDWARD F JR & STEELE 240 CRANDON BLVD #167 PO BOX 2630 JULIANNE BELL REV TRUST KEY BISCAYNE, FL 33149 ASPEN, CO 81612 121 W BLEEKERST ASPEN, CO 81611 ZATS JULIE 118 N GARMISCH ASPEN, CO 81611 P37 Ill.A. ATTACHMENT 5 - Public Hearing Notice Requirements Three forms of notice are required by the Aspen Land Use Regulations: publication in the newspaper, posting of the property, and mailing to surrounding landowners. You can determine whether your application requires notice, and the type of notice it requires, from the matrix found in this application packet. Following is a summary of the notice requirements, including identification of who is responsible for completing the notice. 1. Publication - Publication of notice in a paper of general circulation in the City of Aspen is to be done at least fifteen (15) days prior to the hearing. The legal notice will be written by the Community Development Department and we will place the notice in the paper by the appropriate deadline. 2. Posting - Posting of a sign in a conspicuous place on the property is to be done fifteen (15) days prior to the hearing. It is the applicant's responsibility to obtain a copy of the sign from the Community Development Department. to fill it in correctly and to provide an affidavit at the hearing that posting took place. 3. Mailing - Mailing of notice is to be made to all owners of property within 300 feet of the subject development parcel by the applicant fifteen (15) days prior to the hearing. It is the applicant's responsibility to obtain a copy of the notice from the Community Development Department, to mail it, and to provide an affidavit at the hearing that posting took place. The names and addresses of property owners who will receive notice by mail shall be those on the current tax records of Pitkin County as they appeared no more than sixty (60) days prior to the date of public hearing. Subdivision applications also require notice by registered mail to all surface owners, mineral owners and lessees of mineral owners of the subject property. Proof of notice must be provided at the public hearing. Aspen Historic Preservation Land Use Application Requirements, Updated: May 29,2007 P36 111.A. 8. For Historic Designation and Historic Landmark Lot Split, the two types of historic preservation reviews in which City Council makes the final determination, staff will prepare a report including the recommendation of the HPC, and a hearing will be scheduled before Council. Council will evaluate the application to determine if the review criteria are met. The Council may approve, disapprove or continue the application to request additional information necessary to make a decision to approve or deny. 9. HPC assigns a member of the Commission to be the "project monitor" for each project they approve. The monitor (and Staff) may periodically visit the site as work is under construction. If the applicant requests a change to any aspects of the project change after the HPC approval, the applicant, Staff, and the project monitor will attempt to address them without returning to the full HPC. 10. Before an application for a building permit can be submitted, a final set of plans reflecting any or all required changes by the HPC or City Council must be on file with the City. Any conditions of approval or outstanding issues which must be addressed in the field or at a later time shall be noted on the plans. 11. Once a Development Order has beeii received, a building permit application may be submitted. At this time the proposal will be reviewed for compliance with the Uniform Building Code and zoning regulations. Fees for water, sewer, park dedication fees, and employee housing will be collected if due. Any document, such as a plat, deed restriction, or other agreement which is required to be filed, must be recorded before the building permit will be issued. Aspen Historic Preservation Land Use Application Requirements, Updated: May 29,2007 P35 111.A. ATTACHMENT 4 General Summary of Historic Preservation Review Process (Please see Section 26.415 of the Aspen Municipal Code for more detailed in formation.) 1. An application is first transmitted to the Community Development Director to determine if it is complete. A complete application for a Certificate of No Negative Effect may be approved by the Community Development Director with no further review if it meets the requirements set forth for that type of work in the Aspen Municipal Code. 2. For all other types of reviews, the applicant shall be notified in writing whether the information is complete or if additional materials are required. 3. A date for a public hearing on a complete application will be scheduled before the HPC. Notice of the hearing shall be provided as required in the Aspen Municipal Code. 4. City Community Development Staff will review the submittal material and prepare a report that analyzes the project's conformance with the design guidelines and other applicable Land Use Code sections. This report will be transmitted to the HPC with relevant information on the proposed project and a recommendation to approve, disapprove or approve with conditions and the reasons for the recommendation. 5. The HPC will review the application, the report and the evidence presented at the hearing to determine the project's conformance with the City of Aspen Historic Preservation Design Guidelines. The order of proceedings at the HPC meeting are as follows: 1. Applicant and public are sworn in 2. Staffpresentation 3. Commission member questions 4. Public comment 5. Commission member comments 6. Applicant response/clarification 7. Commission motion and vote 6. The HPC will approve, disapprove, approve with conditions or continue the application to obtain additional information necessary to make a decision to approve or deny. If the application is a one-step review, and it is approved, the HPC will issue a Certificate of Appropriateness and the Community Development Director will issue a Development Order. Ifthe application requires submittal for a final review, materials must be prepared and submitted according to the processes described above. A project that receives final approval will be issued a Certificate of Appropriateness and the Community Development Director will issue a Development Order. 7. HPC decisions are final unless appealed by the applicant or a landowner within three hundred (300) feet of the subject property, as provided in the Aspen Municipal Code. For Major Development, Demolition, or Relocation, a resolution of the HPC action will be forwarded to the City Council to allow them an opportunity to "call up" the decision if they feel there has been an abuse of discretion or denial of due process. No building permit can be issued for construction of the project until the thirty (30) day "call up" period has expired. Aspen Historic Preservation Land Use Application Requirements, Updated: May 29,2007 P34 111.A. KEY 1. Contained within a letter signed by 12. Property or district description including 27. A written description and/or graphic the applicant, the applicant's name. narrative text. photographs and/orÂ· other illustrations ofthe building. structure or address and telephone number. and graphic materials that document its physical object proposed for relocation. the name. address. and telephone characteristics. 28. A written explanation ofthe type of number of any representative 13. Identification ofthe character-defining relocation requested (temporary. on-site or authorized to act on behalf of the features that distinguish the entity which off-site) and justification for the need for applicant. should be preserved. relocation. 2. The street address, legal 14. Verification that the proposal complies with 29. A written report from a licensed engineer or description, and parcel Section 26.410, Residential Design architect regarding the soundness ofthe identification number of the Standards. or a written request for a vanance building, structure or object, its ability to property proposed for development. from any standard that is not being met. withstand the physical move and its 3. A disclosure of ownership ofthe 15. Photographs, building material samples rehabilitation needs. once relocated. parcel proposed for development, and other exhibits, as needed, to accurately 30. A conceptual plan for the receiving site consisting of a current certificate depict location. extent and design of the providing preliminary information on the from a Title insurance company, or proposed work. property boundaries. existing improvements attorney licensed to practice in the 16. An accurate representation of all major and site characteristics and the associated State of Colorado, listing the names building materials and finishes to be used in planned improvements. of all owners of the property. and the development: depicted through samples or 31. Evidence of the financial ability to all mortgages, judgments. liens. photographs. undertake the safe relocation, preservation easements. contracts and 17. Scaled elevations and/or drawings ofthe and repair ofthe building, structure or object; agreements affecting the parcel, and proposed work and its relationship to the site preparation and construction ofnecessary demonstrating the owner's right to designated historic buildings, structures, sites infrastructure through the posting of bonds or apply for the Development and teatures in its context. other financial measures deemed appropriate. Application. 18. Scaled drawings ofthe proposed structure(s) 32. Supplementary materials to provide an 4. An 8 1/2" x 11" vicinity map or addition(s) depicting their form, including understanding ofthe larger context for the locating the subject parcel within their height, massing. scale. proportions and relocated property and its impact on adjacent tile City ofAspen. roof plan: and the primary features ofall properties. the neighborhood or streetscape. 5. A site plan depicting the proposed elevations in the neighborhood context. 33. Ifthe applicant does not own the receiving layout and the projects physical 19. Supplemental materials to provide a visual site. proof from the sites property owner of relationship to the land and its description ofthe context surrounding the the willingness to accept the relocated surroundings. designated historic property or historic district building, structure or object. 6. A site improvement survey including at least one (1) ofthe following: 34. Evidence that the applicant has or is seeking certified by a registered land diagrams. maps, photographs. 3-D model the necessary approvals to place the surveyor. licensed in the State of (digital or physical) or streetscape elevations. building on the identified receiving site. If Colorado, showing the current the site is outside ofthe city limits, status of the parcel including the 20. Preliminarv selection ofprimarv building verification that the building will be current topography and vegetation. materials to be used in construction preserved on its new site through a formal (This requirement, or any part represented by samples and/or photographs. action ofthe other jurisdiction or a thereof. may be waived by the 21. A statement, including narrative text or preservation easement. Community Development Director graphics. indicating how the Final 35. A written description ofhow the properly if the project is determined not to Development Plan con forms to does not meet these criteria for designation. warrant a survey document.) representations made or stipulations placed as 36. A lighting plan indicating the location of all 7. A written description of the a condition of the approval of the Conceptual exterior light fixtures and site lighting. and proposal and a written explanation Development Plan. cut sheets for each type of fixture proposed. ofhow the proposed development 22. Final drawings of all proposed structures(s) Light fixtures must comply with the "City of complies with the review criteria and/or addition(s) included as part of the Aspen Historic Preservation Design and The City of Aspen Historic development at 91" = 1.0' scale Guidelines" and meet the City Lighting Code. Preservation Design Guidelines 23. A revised site plan relevant to the development 24. Revised scaled elevations and drawings application. 25. Photographs and other exhibits to illustrate 8. Additional materials, the proposed changes. documentation. or reports as 26. Written documentation that the Chief deemed necessary by the Building Official has determined the building Community Development Director. an imminent hazard. QI narrative text, 9. Completed Land Use Application graphic illustrations or other exhibits that Form, Signed Fee Agreement, and provide evidence that the building. structure Fee. or object is of no historic or architectural 10. Dimensional Requirement Form. value or importance. 11. Site or historic district boundary map. Aspen Historic Preservation Land Use Application Requirements, Updated: May 29,2007 P33 Matrix of The City of Aspen's Historic Preservation Land Use Application Requirements To review full procedures for all applications, reference 26.415 of The City of Aspen Building Code, Historic Preservation Ordinance. When submitting multiple step applications, do not replicate submission materials. Two copies ofthe application are required for a Certificate of No E#ect, 1 5 copies are required for each meetingall other review. Also note that an electronic version of all text documents is required in a .txt, .doc, .wpd, or .rtf format. Application Fees Type of Review Notice Reg uirements Requirements Deposit Fee Publication. Posting and Mailing Pursuant to Sections Designation 1-9,11,12 $0 26.304.060 (E) (3) (a) (b) (c.) at 11PC and Council Consult with Historic Preservation Exempt Development $0 None Officer to confirm exempt status Certificate of No Neeative Effect 1-9,15,17 $245 None Minor Development 1-10,15,16,17,36 $735 Posting Pursuant to Sections 26.304.060 (E) (3) (b) Development Linder 1,000 s. f., $ 1,470 Publication, Posting and Mailing Pursuant to Sections Maior Development / Conceptual 1-10, 14, 17,18, 19, 20 / Development over 1,000 s.f., $2,940 26.304.060 (E) (3) (a) (b) (c) Publication, Posting and Mailing Pursuant to Sections Maior Development /Final 1-10,16,21.22.36 Paid at time of conceptual 26.304.060 (E) (3) (a) (b) (c) Publication, Posting and Mailing Pursuant to Sections Substantial Amendment 1-10,16,23,24,25,36 $735 26.304.060 (E) (3) (a) (b) (c) Publication, Posting and Mailing Pursuant to Sections Demolition 1-9,26 $2,940 26.304.060 (E) (3) (a) (b) (c) Publication, Posting and Mailing Pursuant to Sections Relocation 1-9,27-34 $2,940 26.304.060 (19 (3) ta) (b) (c) Publication, Posting and Mailing Pursuant to Sections Historic Landmark Lot Split 1-10 $1,470 26.304.060 (10 (3) (a) (b) (c) at HPC and Council Publication, Posting and Mailing Pursuant to Sections Rescinding Designation 1-9,35 $1,470 26.304.060 (E) (3) (a) (b) (c) at HPC and Council Aspen Historic Preservation ~ Land lise Application Requirements, Updated: May 29.2007 ~ led r - - SHEET INDEX ~ t Z-CVR COVER LAND USE APPROVALS , LAND USE APPROVALS LAND USE APPROVALS SURVEY Z 001 ZONING SUMMARY Z Â·002 RDS COMPLIANCE 2-003 SITE PLAN 715 West Main Street. Suite 204 Z-004 FLOOR AREA CALCULATIONS Aspen, Colorado 81611 PÂ· 970.279 4157 F- 866 770 558'- Z 005 FLOOR AREA CALCULATIONS: Z-006 FLOOR AREA CALCULATIONS Z-101 FLOOR PLANIS 2â€ž102 FLOOR PLANS 2-103 FLOOR PLANS 101 E HALLAM Z-104 ROOF PLAN HALLAM LLC 101 E Hallam St 2Â·201 ELEVATIONS HPC Aspen. Colorado 81611 2-202 El.EVATIONS HPC Z-301 STREETSOAPE 2-302 MATER]ALS 71,50 00-1<.3*lr- ".=Te-4-â‚¬Â·et.t=)..,p s i . , 1 N.vt fi i . ..a,F y i V / gf 1 'IN -a P 34, u-Â·m k' I ~-tjtz-- r ~f=fi~ 4 -i Â·& VI,fiti,2 /' ...ir Nt / f /*1~~1 14/ ..Â· 1 i 4 . , '" . t- f f-*i .3, -,jp 1 - C re. . Nic* 49 *; -~M CONSULTANTS SURVEYOR 17 * 6,._y.1 z.r-. *4 19 '41 Â» - Aspen Survey Engineers, Inc k.. , .-li .4, ~ 4, ~ Jr: ~* 1 *Â¥6:4- .. -+ r 42 =.11' 14 1 Or - - 3.111 .- V %\ , i / .0Â·Â· j . p A tivt Y~ . ,- ... 1. . .ph *34 210 S Galena Crt est \91 .9/ ''. r , r-h '11. Â· 6 B /.7.7-,Â¥'... -0/9,fi:44 3Â· 9% #12/*-*_- t# ~ '' '~' '* T-~; 41.j t a, y , ~ Â·. .5 ir- F'/ 462 -~~~~~~Â·~, ~_ i,- 0 '7 <'st:~Â·i, ' 1-0'-t T/%/ 12-4-01 - 77194 4 sp-' . f 'Â· I 'r /* P . + 1 . I 'P .42 IF f ' Â·0(- F . fl 4 ; Aspen, Colorado 81611 I ./ ... $ r- - IT 3* -~At (970) 925-3816 t. aspensurveyofs@gmal!.coin IF Â·i ' .9 CIVIL U A , --Le I. . 4'.w.ID * TBD ./6 4% /TS'tv r. A 'I .A -/ d *2- , V ,/ Â£ 5 , r /1 Â»/ 1.1 k - L ex: i 4 2 / Â£ Â·1~ * Â·A ...Â·- + .- Â·, â‚¬-~ g<K ~kÂ·3â€¢Â·' hc A- 2 9 4 Â·<3>41 :141 -19.AUU: ity,r *r (~ B 1,Â»2 L , f 1.Fe.,1, 1 M . - 1 1 1 00 . r #5 4 1 i:4 Â· acm *'2 . '' 1 , 1 L Il yÂ·* f . & *.' - - 1 .. . . % 4 11 -256 b i . . - 41 v aUS N -1 MECHANICAL TBD i Â·,4 i, 14 1â€¢ ~Â·2*-4 . 1.114,3 AE?W,Â·3 STRUCTURAL TBD K +-,71,4 i '*>1'Â¥ 3 z (~'ir~VU1 Pi1 - - ~1- -+ 1* - ' LI'~+ *~ed.,Ar~t Â¢1- 2 9=~ =- C-- 1-----r .1 te.*m 1 Il i i >/ 1\'~ I ,)PaY 7/0,=.,6' Â·~ i: ' ~.'h6 1,11 i, 4 9 .0:Hed Pr 111 TBD 1 1 4 44 11/T'vilill' h ,,.,1 J : 1 IP . P - *" ize ='CC~ 4 -4 -9=t 4==14=iâ‚¬d W 111'11 1 1 ., = r- 1 111 7 1 i r , 11 1,11 k .*-4 1 f J.r ~ ' -' i.. 4 10 1. , li' i **f<,1#.... 1 6--4=* -.,V'~4- /. '5 ' #CigUaludIV 7 ~I La- - , 10 4'209 DATE Of P/8UCAT10N i .Illy I Aig. 7'i'11,1*~i.t)~11:,f li' 4 1 ' 4.Â·46 *r 1, - Â· :' :'1.1 -1 i,il :t~bAAhAI,41:.-,â€¢1"- ... , 2 -0 - Â·-----Â·- I -V---- .I-17-4-----Â£ 4 -.*#-It - ~~ ~ 1 - ; ' 1*-- ----52. A-- .-02*-*.-<*-M< W.i.-%. m.-.--.-1. Ir SD 10/22/14 HPC MINOR REV CONIT SD 9/2Â·14 HPC MINOR REVIEW .// / PROJECT NO. 1411 DRAWNI BY: KPT COPYRIGHT FORUM PHI, LLC. 1. 1 / SCOPE OF WORK The remodel of the main and upper non-historic levels of a landmarked historic residence and addition of a subgrade/basement level and garage w,It, roof deck 101 E HALLAM SHEET TITLE 101 E Hallam Street, Aspen, Colorado, 81611, Z-CVR HPC MINOR DEVELOPMENT REVIEW COVER ORDINANCE NO. 16 (SERIES OF 2001) C. Designer. The structure Ls a significant work of an architect or designer 1 whok individual work has inftuenced the character of Aspen. i AN ORDINANCE OF THE ASPEN CITY COUNCIL GRANTING APPROVAL Ser#gul; Pursuant to the findings set forth in Section 1, above. the City Council does FOR LANDMARK DESIGNATION OF 101 E. HALLAM STREET, LOT A AND D. Neighboihood Chirede. The structure or site is a significant component of hereby designate as an Historic Landmark 101 F. Hallam StreeL l.ot A and the west 4.86 rHE WEST 4.86 FEET OF LOT B, BLOCK 65, CITY AND TOWNSITE OF an historically significant neighborhood ind the preservation of the structure or feet of Lot B, Block 65, City and Townsite of Aspen, without conditions. , ASPEN site is important for the maintenance of that neighborhood character. SeÂ£1128-13 If any section, subsection, sentence, clause, phrase or portion of this 1 Parcel identification No. 2735-124-37-001 E. Communibr Chamcier. The structure or site is entical to the preservation of ordinance is for any reason held invalid or unconstitutional by my court of competent 3 the character of the Aspen community because of its relationship m terms of size, junsdiction such pmvision and such holding shall not affec, the validity of the remaining location and architectural similarity to other structures or sites of historical or portions thereof. .1, -- 1.1 WHEREAS, the applicants, Jim and Patricia Gorman. represented by Mary A. Avjian architectural importance: and Architects. have requested landmark designation for the property at 101 E. Hallam Street. Section 4: This Ordmance shall not affect any existing htigat:on and shall not operate as Lot A and the west 4.86 feet of Lot B. Block 65, City and lownsite of Aspen; and WHEREAS, the Aspen City Council has reviewed and considered the Landmark an abatement of any action or proceeding now pending under or by virtue of the 715 West Main Street. Suite 204 Designation. has reviewed and considered those recommendations made by the ordinances repealed or amended as hemin provided, and the same shall be conducted and Aspen, Colorado 81611 P 970.279 4157 F 866 770 5585 WHEREAS, pursuant to Section 26.420.020, requests for landmark designation shall be Community Development Department. the Historic Preservation Commission, and the concluded under such pyior ordinances. reviewed and recommended for approval, approval with conditions. or disapproval by the Planning and Zoning Commission. and has taken and considered public comment at a Community Development Director, by the HPC, and by the Planning and Zoning public hearing: and Seliual: A put>[10 hearing on the Ordinance was held on the 14th day of May, 200] at Commission at a public hearing. and then approved, approved with conditions. or 5:00 P.M. in the City Council Chambers, Aspen City Hall, Aspen Colorado. fifteen (15) disapproved at a public hearing by the City Council, and WHEREAS, the City Council finds that the Landmark Designation meets or exceeds all days prior to which hearing a public notice of the same was published once in a applicable development 5tandards of the above re ferenced Municipal Code sections, and newspaper of gencra~ circulation within the City of Aspen. 101 E HALLAM HALLAM LLC WHEREAS, the Community Development Director performed an analysis of the application based on the standards, found favorably for the application. and WHEREAS, the applicant requests. and Council hereby approves a one-time $2,000 INTRODUCED, READ AND ORDERED PUBLISHED as provided by law, by the 101 E Hallam St recommended approval of landmail, designation: and landniark grant pursuant to Section 26.420.030. if available in this fiscal year, and City Council of the City of Aspen on the 23,d day of April, 2001. Aspen, Colorado 81611 WHEREAS, the Aspen Historic Preservation Commission reviewed and recommended WHEREAS, the City Council finds that this Ordinance furthers and is necessary for the 2Â»4.41~ approval of la.ndmark designation by a vote of 5 1 on April 11,2001; and public health, safety and welfare. WHEREAS, the Aspen Planning and Zoning Commission reviewed and recommended NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCLL OF THE ( Rachel E. Richards, 1*yor Rpproval of landmark designalion by a vote of 5 to 0 on April 17. 2001; and CITY OF ASPEN, COLORADO, THAT: WHEREAS, all applications for Historic 1..andmark Designation shall meet two or more Section 1: Pursuant to Section 26.420,020 of the Municipal Code, the City Council of the following Standards for Designation of Section 26.420.010 in order for Council to finds as follows in regard to the Historic Landmark Designation and Grant Request: grant approval. namely: t. The applicant's submission is complete and sufficient to afford review and /' Kathryn SE#och, City Clerk A. m,roi,cal imponance: The StIUCture or site :s a principal or secondary evaluation for approval; and structure or site commonly identified or associated with a person or event of historical significance to the cultural. social, or political history of Aspen, the 2. The landmark designation is appropriate, finding that standards A (historical APPROVED AS TO FORM: State of Colorado, or the 1:nited Su~es. importance). B (architectural importance). D (neighborhood character) and E (cImmunity character) of Section 26.420.010 are met; and CONSULTANTS B. Archimmid hniperianci. The structure or site reflects an architectural style All #viat SURVEYOR that is unique, distinct or of traditional Aspen character, or the Ntructure or site 3. The property is eligible for, and the applicant shall receive a $2,000 landmark embodies the distinguishing characteristics of a significant or unique architectural designation grant, if funds are available in this fiscal year John 4'ordster, City Attorney Aspen Survey Engineers. Inc type (based on building form or use). or specimen. 210 S Galena Street Aspen, Colorado 81611 1111111!1111111111111111111 n'1111111111111111111111111 1111111 lilli 111111111111111111111111111111111111111 lili (970) 925-3816 aspensurveyors@gmail coin 455762 06/2S/2001 11Â·21A ORDINANC DAVIS SILVI 455762 06/25/2001 11:21A ORDINANC DAVIS SILVI 2 of 4 R 20.00 0 0.00 N 0.00 PITKIN COUNTY CO 111111111111111111 1,1111111 Iilill 'll'11 m 1111111111111 CIVIL 1 of 4 R 20.00 0 0.00 N 0.00 PITKIN COUNTY CO 455782 06/25/2001 11.21A ORDI-IC DAVIS SILVI 3 of 4 R 28.00 0 0.00 N 0.00 PITKIN COUNTY CO TBD Resolution No 16 of 2001 Resolution No 16 of 2Dol Resolution No 16 of 2001 MECHANICAL- TBD STRUCTURAL TBD FINALLY, adopted, passed and approved this 14th day of May, 2001. Â«5. CONTRACTOR -BD ;achel E. Richards, Mtor ,>Mft#41Â» 10 4.20 DATE OF PUBLICkTION , Kathryn S. 10ch, City Clerk G plann,Mg/....pc/caseÂ¢,Anha,ki' I...loid SD 10/22/14 HPC MINOR REV CONT SD 9/23/14 HPC MINOR REVIEW PROJECT NO 1411 DRAWN BY. KPT COPYRIGHT FORUM PHI. LLC I Ilmillilli 1!Illl Ilull lil Illil! Ill,!I jill,Ill Ill lili 455762 06/25/2001 11:21A ORDINANC DAVIS SILVI 4 of 4 R 20.00 0 0.00 N 0,00 PITKIN COUNTY CO SHEET TITLE LAND USE Resolution No 16 of 2001 APPROVALS 1, 715 West Main Street, Suite 204 Aspen, Colorado 81611 P 970.2794157 F 866 770 5585 101 E HALLAM HALLAM LLC 101 E Hallam St Aspen, Colorado 81611 CONSULTANTS SURVEYOR Aspen Sufvey Engineers. Inc 210 S Galena Street Aspen, Colorado 81611 (970) 925-3816 aspensurveyofs@gmail corn CIVIL TBD MECHANICAL- TBD RESOLUTION NO.J- Series of 1998 Section 3. Conditions upon Which Variance ia Granted. 3. The grant of variance will be generally consi,tent with A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT OF THE CITY OF ASPEN the purposes, goals, objectives, and policies of the The variance granted by Section 2, above, is specifically STRUCTURAL GRANTING A VARLANCE WITH CONDITIONS IN CASE NUMBER _91=1 Aspen Area Comprehensive Plan and Chapter 24 of the conditioned upon and Bubject to the following conditionE: 1. No balcony or similar improvement *hall be permitted TBD RELATING TO PROPERTIES IN THE CITY OF ASPEN WITH STREET ADDRESSES A/per Municipal Code. OF 101 EAST HALLAM STREET AND 105 EAST HALLAM STREET, ASPEN, COLORADO AND LEGAL DESCRIPTIONS OF LOT A AND THE WESTERLY 4. The grant of variance il the minimum variance that within the east aide yard setback. 4.96 FEET OF LOT B, BLOCK 65; AND THE EAST 25.14 FEET OF LOT B AND will make pouible the reaeonable use of the parcel, Section 24.6-207 of the Aspen Municipal Code, the variance granted THE WEST 8 FEET OF LOT C, BLOCK 65, CITY AND TOWNSITE OF ASPEN, building or structure. 2. Unle. veated as part of a development plan pursuant to 5. The literal interpretation and enforcement of the herein shall automatically expire after twelve (12) months from CONTRACTOR WHEREAS, Mr. Donald Krumm and Mr. Alan Buah have made terme of Chapter 24 of the Aapen Municipal Code the date of approval unleen development has been commenced as TBD would deprive the applicant of rights cammonly enjoyed evidenced by the Uwance of a building permit, or an extension application. dated April 1. 1998 to the Board of Adjustment for a by other parcola in the ,ame zone district, and would granted by the Board in which case the variance shall expire at variance from the dimevional rsquirtments of Chapter 24 of the cause the applicant unneceâ€¢mary hardship or practical the end of the extension. difficulty. In determining that the applicant'/ righte Aspen Municipal Code, and would be deprived absent a variance, the Board 3. Applicant ehall, prior to filing an application for a considered certain ~pecial conditions and circum- building permit. cause to be recorded with the Clerk and 10 '4202 DATE J P/ELCATION stancee which arâ€¢ unique to the parcel, building or Recorder'z Office of Pitkin County a copy of this resolution. WHEREAS. this matt,r came on for hoaring before thi Board of structure. which are not applicable to other parcele, INTRODUCED, READ AND ADOPTED by the Board of Adjuitment Adjultment on April 30, 1998 and aftir full deliberations and structures or buildings in the mame zone district and which do not reault from the actions of the applicant; of the City of Ampin on tlll 7th day M May, 1998 consideration of the evidence and teetimony preeented. to witt 41.2-44-47 -,- ~ NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT OF The existing non-conforming location of the hietoric ChatÂ»erion _ _ ._1.- ehed, which epang both properties, combined with the non- THE CITY OF ASPEN, COLORADO: conforming lot width of the properties. significantly I, the undersigned duly appointed ind acting Deputy ~ conetrains the ar,a available for development. city Clerk do certify that the foregoing U a true and accurate SD 10/22/14 HPC MINOR REV CONT copy of that rwolution adopted by the Board of Adjugtment of the SD i 92:Â·14 HPC MINORREVIEW 812111Â¤n_1. Findings of Fact. Section 2. Variance Granted. City of Aspen, Colorado, at a meeting held on the day hireinabove atated. 0â€ž*Â·.1. Â£-A------- The Board of Adjustment makÂ®m the following findings of *-- PROJECT NO: 1411 The Board of Adjuetment does hereby grant the applicant the fact: of Oeputy City Clirk 1 Â£Â» following variance from the terms Chapter 24 of the Aspen 6/ . - DRAWN BY. APT Approved as to content: 1. A development application for a variance was initiated Municipal Code: the expansion of an exiating mhed by 4 1/2 feet to the west of the -0 -14- COPYRjGHT FORUM PHI. LLC by: Mr.Donald Krumm and Mr. Alan Bush for properties with /treet addreaies of 101 Eut Hallam Strâ€¢et and 105 East A four foot rear yard and a five foot ,ide y.rd setback Hallam Street, Upen, Colorado. variance at both 101 East Hallam and 105 Eaet Rallam to allaw for --1-11 2. Notice of the propo/ed variance hai been provided to existing weat wall of gaid shed. Assi,tant City Atte y aurrounding property owners in accordance with section 24-6 205(E) (4)b) of the Aspen Municipal Code. Evidince of iuch notice 9 on file with the City Clerk. 1/f. i 1 1111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111 f , ! 2 1'.. ;, , â€ž 1111Ill111Illill!1 lilli11111I11111Illl(Illi1111 lili lili 1 424379 11/11/1* 09 280 RESOLUTI DAVIS SILÂ¥1 2- 424379 11/11/1998 00:26,A RESOLUTI DAVIS SILVI 1111111111111111!111111111111111111111111111111 lili lili 2 *f 3 1 18.00 D 0.00 N 0.00 PIâ„¢IN COUNTY CO 3 .f 3 R 16.00 0 0.00 N 0.00 PITKIN COUNTY CO SHEET TITLE 424379 11/11/1998 09 26A RESOLUT! DAVIS SILVI 1 of 3 R 18.00 0 0.00 N Â®.00 PITKIN COUNTY co LAND USE Resoluboo No 2 of 1998 Resolution No 2 of 1998 Resolution No 2 of 1998 APPROVALS RESOLUTION OF THE ASPEN PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION APPROVING AN APPLICATION FOR HISTORIC LANDMARK DESIGNAT]ON FOR THE PROPERTY LOCATED AT 101 E. HALLAM D. Neighborhood Cha,ami. The structure or site is a significant component of STREET, LOT A AND THE WES-1 4.86 FEET OF LOT B, CITÂ¥ AND an historically significant neighborhood and the preservation of the structure or TOWNSITE OF ASPEN, COLORADO site is important for the maintenance of that neighborhood character , PARCEL ID#2735-124-37-001 E. Communily Chanda. The structure or site is critical to the preservation of the character of the Aspen community because o f its relationship in terms of size. locat,on and architectural similarity to other structures or sites of historical or RESOLUTION NO. 17, SERIES OF 2001 architectural importance, and WHEREAS, the applicants, Jim and Patricia Gorman, have requested Historic Landmark WHEREAS, during a duly noticed public hearing on April 17,2001, the Aspen Planning Designation for the property located at 101 E. Hallam Street, Lot A and the west 4.86 teet and Zoning Commission considered the recommendation made b> the Community 715 West Main Street. Suite 204 of Lot B, Block 65, City and Townsite of Aspen. Colorado. The property is currently Development Director and HPC, took and considered public testimony and Aspen, Colorado 81611 listed on the '~Inventory of Historic Sites and Structures'-: and recommended. by a vote of 5 to 0, that Cit> Council approve landmark designation P 970.279 4157 F: 866 770 5585 finding lhat standards A,B, D and E are met. WHEREAS. pursuant to Section 26.420.020, requests for landmark designation shall be reviewed and recommended for approval, approval with conditions, or disapproval by the NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED: Community Development Director, by the HPC, and by the Planning and Zoning Commission at a public hearing, and then appmved. approved with conditions, or That the Planning and Zoning Conimission jecommends Council approve landmark 101 E HALLAM disapproved at a public hearing by the City C'ouncn, and designation for 1.01 E. Hallam Street. Lot A and the west 4.86 fect of Lot B, Block 65. HALLAM LLC City and Townsite of Aspen, Colorado 101 E Hallam St WHEREAS, the Community Development Director performed an analysis of the Aspen. Colorado 81611 application based on the standards. found favorably for the application. and APPROVED by the Commission at ~ts regular meeting on April 17,2001. rccommended approval of landmark designation: and WIIEREAS, the Aspen Historic P,eservation Commission reviewed and recommended APPROVED AS TO FORM: PLANNING AND ZONING appmval of landmark designation by avoi d 5-1 on April 11,2001; and COMMISSION: WHEREAS, all applications for Historic Landmark Designation shall meet two or more of the f,Alowing Standards for Designation of Section 26.420.010 in order for P&Z to 0-1 ) 4- ,Â«U_ grant approval, namely: City AMorney Robert Illaich, Chair A Historical Impariance: The structure or site is a principal or secondary structure or site commonly identified or associated with a person or event of historical significanc, to the cultural, social, or political history of Aspen, the ATTEST: State of Colorado. or the United States. B. Architecturat Imponon. The structure or site reflects an architectural style L~*u.j XMAM that is unique. disunot or of tradmnal Aspen character. or the structure or site CONSULTANTS embodies the distinguishing characteristics of a significant or unique archit"wral ~kie I.othian. Deputy City Clerk type (based on building form or use).or specimen SURVEYOR Aspen Suivey Engineers. Inc 210 S Gatena Stmet C. Designer. The structure is a significant work of an architect or designer whose individual work has influenced the character of Aspen Aspen, Colorado 81611 (970) 925-3816 asponsurveyo,s@ginail com 1111111 lilli mil lim 1111111111 lil li 111 lilli lili 111 111111111111111111111111111111111111!111111111111111111 CIVIL 45376B 06/25/2001 11:24A RESOLUTI DAVIS SILVI 453768 06/25/2001 11:24A RESOLUTI DAVIS SILVI TBD 1 of 2 R 10.00 0 0.00 N 0.00 PITKIN COUNTY CO 2 of 2 R 10.00 0 0.00 N 0.00 PIâ„¢IN COUNTY CO Resolution No 17 of 2001 Resolution No 17 of 2001 MECHANICAL TeD 4. Stand,rd: The proposed development enhances or docs not diminish from the conditions o f approval are known and understood and must meet with the Historic architectural character or tntegrity of a designmed historic structure or part RESOLUTION OF THE ASPEN HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISS]ON thereof; and Preservation Officer prior to applying for the building permit, APPROVING AN APPLICATION FOR FINAL DEVELOPMENT AND 9. The General Contractor and/or Superintendent shall be requirtd to obtain a STRUCTURAL VARIANCES FOR THE PROPERTY LOCATED AT 101 E. HALLAM STREET, WHEREAS, Amy Guthrie, in her staff r'cpor dated October 10, 2001, performed an specialty license in histonc preservation pnor to receiving a building pcinit. TBD LOT A AND THE WEST 4.86 FEET OF LOT B, AND 105 E. HALLAM STREET, analysis of the application based on the standards, and recommended approval of the 10. The applicant shall provide a plan for the active protection and shoring of the shed THE EAST 25.14 FEET OF LOT BAND THE WEST 8 FEET OF LOT C, BLOCK on 105 E. Hallam. This plan, as well as thorough documentation of the existing 65, CITYANDTOWNSITEOFASPEN, COLORADO project; and shed, including photographs and measured drawings, will be requimd prior to issuance of building permit. WHEREAS, at thÂ¢]r regular meeting on Octobe, 10,200 1, the Historic PreserÂ·vation PARCEL ID#2735-12+37-001& 2735-124-37-002 11. The applicant shall provide the City with a written agreement between themselves Commission considered the apphcation, found the application to meet the standards and and the owner of 105 E. Hallam Street describing that measures that will bÂ© taken CONTRACTOR to be consistent with the "City of Aspen Histonc Preservation Design Guidelines" and RESOLUTION #45, SERIES OF 2001 to protect the hal f of the shed that Lt is hoped can be preserved, and the manner in TBD approved the application by a vote of 4 to 2 which any damage that may occur shall be corrected. WHEREAS, the applicants, Jim and Patncia Gorman, represented by Mary Holley, have NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED: requested Final Devetopment approval and Variances for the properly located at 101 E. Hallam Street, Lot A and the west 4.86 feet of Lot B, and 105 E. Hallam Street, the east That Final Development and Variances for the property located at 101 E. Hallam Street, 25.14 feet of Lot B and the west 8 fbet of Lot C, Block 65, City and Townsile of Aspen. Lot A and the west 4.86 feet of lot B, Block 65, City and Townsitc of Aspen and 105 E. APPROVED BY THE COMMISSION mt its regular meeting on the 10th day of The properties have both been listed on the "Inventory of Historic Sites and Structures"; Hallam Street, the east 25.14 feet of Lot B and the wed 8 feet of Lot C. Block 65, City and 1014'20Â·:Â· DATE OF PUBUCATEON and October, 2001. Townsite of Aspen be approved with the following conditions: WHEREAS, al] development in an "H," Historic Overlay District or development 1. The HPC has gtanted the following variances: a.5 foot west side yard variance for involving a historic landmark must meet all four Development Review Standards of the existing house, a 5 foot east side yard variance to build in the location of the Section 26.72.010(D) of the Aspon Land Use Code in order for HPC to grant approval. exisung shed. a 3.5 foot west sideyard variance for new construction (the linking namely: element), a 5.5 foot combined sideyard setback variance, a 9.4 foot combined Approved u to Form: - front and rear yard setback variance, a 5 foot rear yard setback variance, and 1. Stiodard: The proposed development ks compatible in general design, missing waiver of one p=king space. 01 4 and volume, scale and site plan with designated historic stnictures located on the 2. The HPC hereby grants the following vmances for the shed on 105 3 Hallam parcel and with development on adjacent parcels when the subject site is in a "H, SD 10/22/14 LHPC MINOR REV CONT Street, in the event that the board agrees that it must be reconstructed due to Historic Overlay District or is adjacent to an Historic Landmark. For historic conditions that cannot be forseen at this time: a rear yard setback vanance of 5 feet Dail'd Hoefer, Assistant eity Attorney SD 9/23/14 IHPC MINOR REVIEW landmarks where proposed development would extend into funt yard, side }wd and and a west sideyard setback variance of 5 fcct to allow it to bc "built in its current rear yard setbacks, extend into the minimum distance between buiktings on the lot, location. exceed the allowed floor area by up to five hundred (500) square feet, or exceed the 3, Information on all venting locations and meter locations shall bc provided for PROJECT NO 1411 Approved as to content: allowed Gite covered by up to five (5) percent, HPC may grant necessary variances review and approval by staff and monitor whrn thc informatioâ€ž is available. DRAWN BY. KPT HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION after making a finding that such variation is more compatible in character with the 4. Submit a dcmolition plan, as part of Lhe building permit plan Bet, indicating historic landmark and the neighborhood than would be development in accord with exactly what areas of the shed are to be removed. dimensional requlremcnts, In no eveni shall variations puauant to this Section 5, No elements are lobe added to thc historic house that did not previously exist. No COPYRIGHT FORUM PHI LLC exceed those vanatiom allowed under Section 26.520.040(8*2), for detached custing extrior materials other than what has been specifically approved herein acce:,sory dwelling units, and may be removed without the approval of staffand monitor. 6. HPC stafr and monitor must approve the type and location of all exterior lighting 2. Standard: The proposed development reflects and is consistent with the fixtures, ATTEST: character of the neighborhood of the parcel proposed for development. 7, There shall be no deviations from the extenor elevations as approved without first j/ being reviewed and approved by HPC staff and monitor, 41** 3-60.4(- 3. Standard: The proposed development enhances or does not detract from the 8. The applicant shall be required to provide the contractor with copies of the HPC hustor'ic significanci of designated histortc structures located on the parcel resolution applicable to this project. The contractor must submit a letter Kâ€¢thy Str*kland, Chief Deputy Clerk proposed for development or on adjacent parcels. addressed to HPC staff as part of the building permit application indicating that all - SHEET TITLE 461105 461105 P.g.. 3 Of 3 ....0, 10:13A 6]L~IA .07~5 .... COUNIÂ¥ CO . 18.00 0 0 00 Page L of 3 .000"11.1 111~ 11 11/21/2.1 10:1. D. ee ~ 461105 P.â€¢ 2 of 3 11/21/2001 10:13/ .LVIA Dall. PITKIN Col~TÂ¥ CO . 15.- Dee. -- 1*nimjl~~~H~SIHImilili~Imm. LAND USE Resolution No 45 of 2001 Resolution No 45 of 2001 Resolution No 45 of 2001 APPROVALS A i la 44% Â·. MON +M' A~>I>.*, r 44Â·41: 4:V ' ' 9 ' '. ..' Â·41 ...LY ,} 7c V ICI N I T Y M A P Â· 2 4- f f eÂ»T.. i 4' 3 +.4 i I .% .... 'r % 4 454 - VA %9340 / i <682, % 1 I tt; A hE.4.t k , 1 M P ROVEMEN I 1 (. F <,GRA PHI C S UR VE Y Ab PEN SURVEY ENGINEERS. INC ' I. ;7Â·...9/I . A 6 *AS~; ;< ~ ~S. xt . Â·Â· _ ' ./ 4 IF V 41 4/ F - -- -- =<fr. - 715 West Main Street. Su,te 204 Aspen, Colorado 8161 1 P 970.2794157 F. 866 770 5585 Zoning Allowance & Project Summary 101 E Hallam St 101 E HALLAM HALLAM LLC Proposed Development ]Single:Family I RemodeUAddition 101 E Hallam St Aspen, Colorado 81611 Parcel # !27351247Â®1 Zone District ]R#__-V .p Allowed ~ProlÂ»sed Setbacks :Exigting :Principal} _ (Pr n.,pal) Refe,ence i Rear- PrIncipal ,10 10 ~10 14 Setback Variance Res A / b t[Â·ae' Â·vÂ· aiiarÂ·ce Rob Reaf -Accessory M 2 981 b IN: 2 iR. Di 710 040 5 3 |5 : - 1 4Â·Â·.-2 C 4 Side |5 15 uistance between Buildings |5 I5 5 i2Â·~ 710 ~J,!0 [ 9 ~yes '~~~# C. 0,ne' 1,9 . __- wes k Supplemental Breakdown Info Exilting Required Ploposed Reference Netleasable/Comm SO FT N/A N/A N/A ----- CONSULTANTS Open Space .4 N/A Not Required for R-6 WA | ::1 7â€¢0 420 0 10 -- - No,Requiredfor R-6 1 | SURVEYOR N/A .6,000 sq n N/A 2; 710 040 D 7 - -- Aspen Survey Engineers. Inc 2"Pallog___.... --Â·Â·Â·Â·Â·- ---------- 210 S Galena Street Aspen, Colorado 81611 Land Value Summary _ Actual Value + . Reference _ (970) 925-3816 Land ,*,1 .1. .i, ASSeS"! aspensurveyors@ginail.corn Improvements 5340000 - iâ€¢11Â·:-,i. Â·Â· v /~sessor - CIVIL Toral $2,702.500 1.11Â· CÂ·'~ "f A.gll TBD MECHANICAL Net Lot Area TBD 101 E Hallam St Zone Dist:,cl Requirements Reference Min Gross Lot A ea (per R-63 ~6,000 SI Ft , 3.000 SI Ft for Hstoric Landmark Properbes 7. 718 040 D 1 STRUCTURAL Min Net Lot Alia (per R-3) 4 500 Sq Ft, 3.000 Sq Ft for Historic Landmark P~opoert:es 26 710.040 D 2 TBD Lot Size Per Survey : Rercrence -Rec..5 ons f. Irea we sÂ· 1:*s O,50-20%,100Â·>bot F orel areato be r d. 1.- 0 4â‚¬ Lot Are-; INA 26 95 020-1 *..' :Â· s for lea *!Â·Â· I ' ;.: ..Â·Â·.:Â· teÂ·-,1, '53;. 4,1 paÂ·rel area to be 1 '-Â·. .Â·}Â·_ - Net Lot Ared 1,Â·/ L. 75 021.1 CONTRACTOR TED -,u . 1.' areawÂ·tÂ·sole/gÂ·eaterthan 30..(0900'parcel areatobi ~ b ..1...ey r : wdtd ;l: L.0/ Area IVA. - .. r.- Â·- 020-1 Total Area ReductÂ· - Â·:. C Net Lot Area 2 ABE '5., A SU.eY ...01Â· DATEOPPUELICATION Allowable Floor Area 101 E Hallam St ........ Allowable Floor Area Reference Per R-6 26 710060 SD 10/22/14 HPCMINOR REV CONT 2,536.08 square feet (2.400 square feet of floor area plus 28 square feet of floor area for each additional 100 square feet In SD 9.,23Â·14 HPC MINOR REVIEW Net Lot Area. up to a maximum of 3,240 square feet) Unique Approvals Reference PROJECT NO. 1411 DRAWN BY. KPT Varianoes 1 IRele,ence COPYRIGHT FORUM PHI. Ll.C Exemptions Reference FIrst 250 sq n exempt Nect 250 sq n to exclude 50% of area, Garage Exempton Areas above 375 sq ft have no exclusions 26 575020.0 7 2-005 15% of gross = 380 4 exempt 26 575 020 D 5 Deck Exemption Front Porch Exempt = 52 50 square feet Z-005 & Z-006 Floor Area Summary Existing Gross (SM Ft) Existing Floor Area {Sq Ft) Propx)&ed Gross (Sq Ft) Proposed Floor Area (Sq Ft) Reference Lower Level 1,64025 42.00 Z-004 SHEET TITLE Garage (located on Main Level) 275.25 12.63 Z-005 Main Level 1,18475 1,18475 1,200.50 1,200 50 Z-005 Common Building 108.00 108.00 108 00 108.00 Z-005 Deck Area 460.25 0.00 400.00 0 00 Z-005 &Z-006 Upper Level 963.75 963.75 1,16300 1163 00 2-006 Z-001 TOTAL 2,716.75 2.256.50 4787.00 2.$26.13 ZONING SUMMARY 1 1 Residential Design Standards Unique Approvals & Variances Residential Design Standards Compliance See Land Use Approvals for complete list of approved resolutions andior admin approvais 101 E Hallam Street RDS Section Code Description ~ Compliance Description Referenced Z Sheets 1 ,lilli 1 1 A Site Design 1, Building orientation. The front facades of all principal structures shall be parallel to the street On corner lots. both This lot is a corner lot and the existjng street facing facades aze parallel to the intersecting Survey street-facing facades must be parallel to the Intersecung streets On curvilinear streets. the streets front Meade of all structures shall be paralle! to the tangent of the midpoint of the arc of the 1 sueet Parcels as outllied in Subsection 26 410 010 8 4 shall be exempt from this requirement One (1> element. such as a bay window or dormer, placed at a front corner of the building may be on a diagonal from the street if desired 2. Build.to lines. On parcels or lots of less than fifteen thousand (15,000) square feet. at least sixty percent Thls lot isa corner lot and more than 60% of the facade ls mthin 5' of the minimum setback Z-003 715 West Main Street. Suite 204 (60%) of the front fagdle shall be within five (5) feet of the minimum front yard setback line Aspen. Colorado 81611 On corner sites. this standard shall be met on the frontage with the longest block length P 970 279 4157 F. 866 770 5585 Porches may be used to meet the sixty percent (60%) standard 3. Fences. Fences hedgerows and planter boxes shall not be more than Tony-two (42) inches high, The extsbng 3 ft wrought-,ron fence Is to be relocated to the west property line Z-003 measured from natural grade. in all areas forward of the front facade of the house Man-made berms are prohiblted in the front yard setback 101 E HALLAM B. Building Form 1. Secondary mass. All new single-family and duplex structures shall locate at least ten percent (10%) of their total This lot contains an exising historic structure to remain that predates the RDS Survey HALLAM LLC square footage above grade l n a mass which is completely detached from the pnncipal building or linked to lt by a subordinate linking element This standard shall only apply to 101 E Hallam St parcels ~thinthe Aspen Infill area pursuantto Subsection 26 410 010 B 2 Accessory Aspen, Colorado 81611 buildings such as garages sheds and accessory da,elling units are examples of appropriate uses for the secondary mass A subordnate linking element for the purposes of linking a primary and secondary mass shall be at leastten (10) feet in length, not more than ten (10) feet in width. and w,th a FWate height of not more than nine (9) feet Accessible outdoor space over the linkng element (e g a deck) is permutted but may not be covered or enclosed Any railing for an accessible outdoor space over a linking dement must be the minimum reasonably necessary to provide adequate safety and building code compliance and the railing must be 50% or more transparent C. Parking, Garages and 1. For all residential uses a) Parldng, garages and carports shall be accessed from an alley or private r/ad The proposed garage ls accessed from the alley Z-003 Carports that have access from an alley or private road. the b) If the garage doors are visible from a street or alley, then they shall be single-stall doors or The proposed garage door is a single stall door Z-202 following standards shall double-stall doors designed to appear like single-stall doors apply: c) If the garage doors are not visible from a street or aDey. the garage doors may be either The proposed garage door ls a single stall door Z-202 single-stall or normal dcuble-stall garage doors 2. For all residential uses a) On the street facing facade(s). the width of the living area on the first noor shall be at least The garage is accessed via an alley therefore this section does not apply Z-003 that have access only from five (5) feet greater than the width of the garage or carport a public street, the CONSULTANTS following standards shall b) The font facade of the garage or the tront-most suppolting column of a carport shall be sel The garage is accessed via an alley therefore thrs section does not apply. Z-003 be apply. back at least ten ( 10) feet further from the street than the front-most wall of the house SURVEYOR Aspen Survey Engineers. Inc c) On lots of at least fifteen thousand (15,000) square feet in size, the garage or carport may The garage Is accessed via an alley therefore this section dies not apply Z-003 210 S Galena Street be forward of the front facade of the house onÂ¢y if the garage doors or carpol entry are perpendcular to the street (side-loaded) Aspen, Colorado 81611 (970) 925-3816 aspensurveyofs@ginail.conn d) When the noor of a garage 01 carport Is above or below the street level, the driveway cut The garage is accessed via an alley therefore this section does not apply Z-003 within the front ya'd setback shall not exceed two (2) feet in depth, measured from natural grade CIVIL TeD e) The vehicular entrance width of a ga,age or carport shall not be greater than twenty.four The garage is accessed via an alley theiefore this section does not apply 2-003 (24)feet f) If the garage doors are visible from a public street or aliey, then they shall be single-stall The garage ls accessed vÂ¢a an alley therefore this section does not apply 2-003 doors or double-stall doors designed to appear hke single-stall doors MECHANICAL D. Building Elements 1. Street oriented entrance All single-family homes and duplexes. except as outlined in Subsection 26410 010 B 4 shall The existing histonc house has a street-oriented entrance and a street faang principal window Z-201 TBD and principal window. have a street-oriented entrance and a street fa[Ing principal window Multi-family units shall to remain have at least one ( 1) street-oriented entrance for every four (4) units and frontunits musthave a street facing a prinapal wIndow On corner lots, entries and principal wIndows should face whichever street has a greater block length This standard shall be satisfied If all of the followIng conditons are met STRUCTURAL a) The entry door shall face the street and be no more than ten (10) feet back from the front- The existng entry door to remain is no more than ten (10) feet back from the front most wall of Z-102 TBD most wall of the building Entry doors shall not be taller than eight (8) feet the building aRdis not taller than eight (8) feet b) A covered entry porch of fifty (50) ormoresquarefeet, withaminimum depthofsix (6Â·) feet The existing historic front pITch is greater than 50 square feet with a minimum depth of 6 feet Z-003 & Z-102 shall be part of the front facade Entry pITchEs and canopies shall not be more than one (1) story In height c) A street-facing pnncipa! window requires that a significant window or group of windows face The exieng street-facing fac:ades contain significant groups of windows Z-201 &Z-202 CONTRACTOR street - TBD 2. First story element All residenta! buildings shall have a first story street-facing element the width of which Thus lot contains an exisbng historic structure to remain that predates the RDS Z-003 compnses at least twenty percent (20%) of the building's overall width and the depth of which is at least six (6) feet from the wall the first story element is projecbng from Assuming that the first story element includes interior living space.the height of the first story element shall not exceed ten (10) feet as measured to the plate height A brst story element may be a porch or 10 142,31: DATEDFPUBLICATION living space Accessible space (whether it is a deck, porch or enclosed area) shall not be allowed over the first story element, however, accessible space over the remaining ~rst story elements on the front fagade shall not be precluded 3. Windows. a) Street-facing windows shall not span through the area where a second floor level would The existng and proposed street-facing windows do not span through nine (9) and twelve (12) Z-201 & Z- 202 -- t,PÂ¢cally exist which is between nine (9) and twelve feet (12) above the finished first floor For feet above the finished first floor interior staircases. this measurement wll! be made from the first landing If one exists A transom window above the main entry *s exempt from this standard b) No more than one (1) non-orthogonal window shall be allowed on each facade of the The existing porton of the house contains thee non-orthogonal windows on the west facade 2-201 & 2-202 building A single non-orthogonal window in a gable end may be divided with mullions and still and one on the north facade ali existing to remain The south facade contains two existing be considered one 1) non-orthogonal w ndow The requirement shall only apply to Subsection non-orthogonal windows to be removed and replaced vAth one non-orthogonal window in the SD 10/22/14 HPC MINOR REV CONT 26410010 B 2 gable end SD 9/23/14 HPC MINOR REVIEW 4. Lightwells. All areaways, lightwells and/or stairwells on the street-facing facade(s) of a building shall be The proposed lightwells are recessed behind the front-most wall of the building and are not Z-003 ent]rely recessed behind the front-most wall of the building located on the street-facing facade PROJECT NO 1411 E. Context 1. Materials. a) The qualky of the extericr matenals and details and their applicabon shall be consistent on The quality of the existing and proposed extenor materials and their applicabon Is consistent Z-201 & Z-202 all sides of the building on all sides of the building DRAWN BY. KPT b) Matenals shall be used in ways that are true lo their characteristics For instance Stuccor The use of materials is true to their charactensts Proposed materials will be approved at 2-201 & Z-202 which I a light or non-bearing material, shall not be used below a heavy material. such as HPC Minor Review, Conhnued for Restudy COPYRIGHT FORUM PHI. [10 stone c) Highly rellective surfaces shall not be used as exter,or matenals There are no proposed highly reflecbve materials Proposed materials will be approved at Z-201 &Z-202 HPC Minor Review, Continued for Restudy 2. Inflection. The following standard must be met for parcels which are six thousand (6,000) square feet or This parcel ls less than six thousand (6,000) square feet therefore this section does not apply Survey over and as outlined in Subsection 26 410 010 B 2 a) If a one-story builling exists directly adjacent to the subject site. then the new construction This parcel ls less than six thousand (6,000) square feet therefore this section does not apply Survey must step down to one-story in height along their common lot line If there are one.story buildings on both /des of the subJect site, the applicant may choose the side toward which to Inflict SHEET TITLE A one-story building shall be defined as follows A one story building shall mean a structure or This parcel is less than six thousand (6,000) square feet therefore this section does not apply Survey porion of a structure where there is only one (1) floor of fully usable living space. at least twelve (12) feet wide across the street frontage This standard shall be met by providing a one story element which es also at least twelve ( 12) feet Ide across the street frontage and one ( 1) story tall as far back along the common lot line as the ad,acent Z-002 building is one (11 story RDS COMPLIANCE - E HALLAM STREET E HALLAM STREET 715 West Main Street Suite 204 . Aspen, Colorado 8Â·1611 // / 1 P 970 279.4157 F: 866 770 5585 4 1 ) <tioi ~it_f- 2-- A4 01 1 0.1 2-7 4 1-1 <4 101 E HALLAM 11 ),vul NU<F-- ~-f' 1 L.7 t--3 1 ~-i HALLAM LLC 101 E Hallam St Aspen. Colorado 81611 1 -3 1 C 14\~ U=mÂ·rfR-{* ~--------2-1- -3 --- ~*ROPER1*INF ~ 1 * Â·v-PE# 49 1 1 78 A t--6 4-i --79\30 l---4. 17 - bo i 'Â·_r7 4-.3 1 -7/ . N YE 3 12,0. 7- ,/ 3 /5 1 17 -7/4 F jo\] \ .1_ C. L..1 L. / / 1 1/~1 >\ 1 \~ 1--\F--3 1 1 SETBACK f.:NE j 6 W . ''i ' 13,DE YARE 1 ' ...5. T 1 LE-L - . 5-0 af>R</Ime/ tiRE..4 -4 ('f}34/ IBi92- 90 %62 1 .... -.- j 1 1 1 1 UNE OF _._011_1 4.-l--1 EXTERIOR WALIN P 4 ~ ~\Â« I EXTERIOR WAL~J-1 -4.- 1 \-\ CONSULTANTS ' -7 /. 1 //: 7 P./Li/4 1'1 .' U I SURVEYOR / /1 I/1 6\kl Zi' 1 4..1 5 â€¢W 1 . w Z Aspen Survey Eng,neers.Inc 1 210 S Galena Street EXISTING 3FT WROUGHT-IRON FENCE i PRB~-OROE3L~~t-Z) TO PROPERTY LINE ~ Aspen, Colorado 81611 EXISTING FENCE / TO BE RELOCATED --$ E or (970) 925-3816 P I aspensurveyors@gmail com 1 1 UJ a : CIVIL 1 LAI . TBD 1 1 . 1 I 1 0 1 E ' 1 MECHANICAL 1 3 Z Â· Â·Â· Â· Â· Â· 94, 1 1 710. 4 ' 1 410' NORTH OF LINE EXTERIOR HISTORIC WAL~~TOREMAIN~.-171 ;73,-i -7 - - ,~~- - --1 233 ~~ititt STRUCTURAL SHEE-r~1 & 2-202 31>~3**AttJat'Un~L ~ TBD - ' - 44.9.Â·4ce,Â·L --->, 31\ 2 -â€ž%2>-4.r~<AZ L 1 3Â»4Â»tâ‚¬*249 1 Â»/ti,-, _~..~.A. 934'Flt 11 1 >Â»3 -44'Fl <: CONTRACTOR 1 1.14,2:]I){6/49 11 . : -/&, I, I ---7~I.- TBD EXIST} NG FENCE TOREMAIN /1 11 A /1 (,1 1/1 /\Â·1 -7/ A '1' 2 PERZ003 RDSAG 14 i : il i.- ~ -7//lili/(~ir<)<\ | . 1 1 -~ 0 1 )1 *F# 6 Li 451~4.4-- 617 i 64 1/ i j !,~ _~ EGRESS LIGHTWELL Â· K Â·01 4,1 '4.E'z=- -- 4, 1 10, :421Â·1 DATE OF PUBUCATION _3 , - PER z-003 RDS 0 4 .r 4 moy- 1 1-Â» A ......... 4 1 1 GARAcE 1 AE('EC,S ~ ~': %2 ) N=74 \1 0 1 1/, U.- fl.~ Â· SD 10/22/14 HPC MINOR REV CONT U in' SD 9/23/14 HPC MINOR REVIEW ~ RDS(1. i k.. - Â· I 1 1 J.LÂ» 9 i t Â»Â« 4 1 0 PROJECT NO 1411 DRAWN BY: APT ALLEY ALLEY COPYRIGHT FORUM PHI. LLC SHEET TITLE 1 PROPOSED SITE PLAN 1/8" = 1'Â·0; 1 X EXISTINIG SITE PLAN Z-003 la SITE PLAN N 148 16 U-/ 0/vA LINE OF SETB OV8136 do 3Nll N GARMISCH STREET 1-r + '. 1 SUBGRADE CALC LEGEND i PROPERVE LINE 1,75 3[In ~ SUBGRADE WALLAREA 202.75 sq It 351.00 sq M ~_] EXPOSED WALLAREA CD (7)(3) (P (i) 21'-4" ~ 1 36'-11'r- 1 2. 3 SETEAA UNE E 7715 West Main Street. Suite 204 8.8. 12'-10 3'-0" 0 ; 1'Â·3" ' I Aspen, Colorado 81611 1 11 P. 970.279 4157 E 866 770 5585 ;100.41! 21/64 1 I I ' 101 E HALLAM 216.25 sq n HALLAM LLC 21Â·-4": I 273.5084 R - 101 E Hallam St 1- r - - r- rv--r * -1.1 1 Aspen, Colorado 81611 28Â·.9 22'-9" - - . ./.112.-6. Â· Â« i 11 : 1 , li 5 hs tli -i=-- .==21 r 1 i - 650.00 sq It Â· L.L. 1 4 1 1 1 1 1 11 68-5" Â· 1' 1 1 6 -- '' Â· CONSULTANTS 11 J 1 11 11 FAR PLAN LEGEND , - SURVEYOR ------ -- - Aspen Survey Engineers. Inc. ! 1 210 S Galena Street Li_J COUNTABLE FLOOR AREA Â·Â· i ~~-- -~ Aspen. Colorado 81611 (970) 925-3816 2. , aspensurveyors@?ginaii com |__1 EXEMPT FRONT PORCH 1 : 1 CIVIL CE--- ----w---vi.- * ---1 4.-1--------in TBD ~ EXEMPT DECK Â· 11 li 1 1 Existing Floor Area Calculations 101 E Hallam St ~ 50% EXEMPT - GARAGE E ~ MECHANICAL TBD ExistÂ·.ng Ltinet Level Floor Area Calculaltions ~ 100% EXEMPT - GARAGE . 1 /1 . s.Â· e- Â·. wei Gross Floor Area i Â°4 CRt) 0 00 f . . $ 11 Lcwer Level Countable Floor Area (Sq ft} 0.00 - - 6 ------------- ---- - -57- - ----- - I-/O Total Existing Floor Afea Calculations . 1 1 --1 ---: A STRUCTURAL TBD Lower Level Floor Area (Sq Ft, -~ 0.00 ' L 42==~-1 Ma 1 _evel Floor Area (Sq Fri 129275 , 1 E:,54, 4' upper Leve: Fioo. Area rba Fl) 963 75 CONTRACTOR 1 1 00 Te/VE'ofer, Floor Area (SQ Ft, 0 :)0 11 ' Total Existing Floor Area (Sq Ft) 2.256.50 1 11 - li TBD - 1 - --- -- 1-1 1 11 1 44 .14f201.4 DUE OF....... Proposed Floor Area Calculations 101 E Hallam St -~ = -- --- - ~- - =;~- 2- ------ ~ ~ Proposed Lower Level Exposed Wall Calculations Lower L./el Wall Label Total Whll Afea (Sq Ft) Exposed Wall Ate, (84 Ft) ' ~ 1 K 1 --:i 1 202.75 0 00 9- I - I . I ~~ , ~~~ - ---- ---61 -z~ - -Â·-Â·-Ki) - -------~ 2 35100 000 : p' i 3 14 75 0 00 . ...I.-.. .â€ž-- 1 4 273.50 42.00 Â· i i SD ' 10/2214 jHPC MINOR REV CONT 5 21625 000 Â· 1'' Jo 00 SD | 9/23/14 IMPC MINOR REVIEW 6 650 00 0.00 O.e-a" Total e/all Area aBc qi 1.640.25 E,poge,] WaiÂ· Ar,9 (Eq Ft; ' 42.00 ~ PROJECT NO. 1411 W c' Exam.ed Wall (Sq F-t) (Exposed /Total) 2 56% --------=-1------------_21 07 DRAWN BY. KPT 22'-9" Proposed Lower LIlli Floor Area Calculations 5.'; COPYRIGHT FORUM PHI. LLC Lower Level Gross Floor Area (Sq Ft) 1,640.25 11 Lower Level Countable Floor Area (Sq Ft) 42.00 1,640,25 X2 56% Total Proposed Floor Area Calculatlons Lower Level Floor Area (Sq Ft) 4200 Main Level Floor Area (Sq Ft) 132113 : 1 Upper Level Floor Area (Sq Ft) 1163 00 1 :l Deckporch Floor Area (Sq Ft) 0 00 | SHEET TITLE Total Proposed Floor Area (Sq Ft) 2,526.13 /, 3) O Z-004 PROPOSED LOWER LEVEL 3/16"= 1'-0" NO EXISTING LOWER LEVEL TEE-3 N FLOOR AREA 148 CALCULATIONS 'a-_ 9'-6"~ 7 :_ ..._ 94'~__ 1 PROPERTY LINE PROPERTY LINE | 7 9 00 1 Ir , 00 1 1 SETBA~K LINE ' SETE!*K LINE ~ 715 West Main Street. Suite 204 1 i | ~ ' Aspen, Colorado 81611 P: 970.279.4157 F: 866 770 5585 1 1 - 11 li I ! ~ 1 EXEMPT FRONT PORCH -~ 1 ll/ I EXEMPTFRONT PORCH -4-0 44 7544 / 101 E HALLAM 1 PER RDS 226 575 020.05 , ~ PER RDS 26.575 020 D.5 iii / ./ 6.7>49 "/ HALLAM LLC - I Â·4 _C - 101 E Hallam St ~ ~.,v .....'-L....Â·Â·Â·Â·Â·Â·Â·Â·Â·Â·Â· ~ - : w ~ / 1 -- L,/ FAR PLAN LEGEND f- .U Aspen. Colorado 81611 :- i 1 -It! Lp.- - --1 w .......... L...... P.- 1 il :: i i ~ COUNTABLE FLOOR AREA j :4 6 'c 1 i i \ L_~ EXEMPT FRONT PORCH pÂ·~:s.U-:t.._t ~__~ EXEMPT DECK : tu:r- i : 1! ,Â·-Â·Â·Â·Â·Â·Â·Â· Â· Ill - , .--- M. ...1,- ..... I 11 1 E 1 1 ~ 50% EXEMPT-GARAGE ,,~ 1 111 Â·Â· -L-3~ ~ ~ 100% EXEMPT -GARAGE ~ 2 1 1 CONSULTANTS -- : ; 1 0 /1 1 Aspen Survey Engineers. Inc SURVEYOR 210 S Galena Street 1 , . Existing Floor Area Calculations Â· Aspen, Colorado 81611 101 E Hallam St : 4 I n 7 (970) 925-3816 h -1 . i aspensurveyors(@ginail.com r Â·,to 1 l FÂ·~Â· ~ ~ E'~ 1: - 1 E. â€žs'.ng P.,ri Level Floor Afea Calculations : ----.'.... 1 1 1 11 1 CIVIL :- -- - .-I./ i. '.- . g. 9 ..r,ilÂ·Z .4- i Â·01#ria(Sqft} _ _ 118475 t - -- - -- *~ t~ -Â·--Â·-- - ---- -t - -~- -- - ---Â·-- - ---4,3 li 1 Ma~l Couniabb Ek,c>r~A~r~(~lal ] - â‚¬Â» - n 1 -- -- .... 8 ....~.~........ ---- --- 4 TBD 1080705 J! /4, EXEMPT FRON- PORCHPERRES â€ž 1 PER RDS 26 575.020 D.5 , EXEMPT FRONT PORCH /A . c 26 575 020.05 i -~ i / . , 1101 00 â€¢111 Â·~ I MECHANICAL - Existing Deck/Porch Floor Area Calculations ' ~ 1 Exempt per REDS ~ ~~ 9~~1,/ / 1 ~ : TED r-. 1 3 1 ! rent //Â·ch Gross r.ior Area fS' F H _ - 165 CO 73 575 020 D 5 2Â·Â·Â·-â€¢ 5,099 /loor A,AE. :. ~ a , V. - 9 Â·_pper LeiÂ·e. M125 Â·5%of gross=38042*empt :~ ,~~ .~2~4~- ' ; 1 1 / 1 DeckiP/ch Countable Floor Are_(Sg Et)___ __ .. [_ 0 00 11 1 1 f TotaIExisting Floorkea Calculations . i ! 1 9 : STRUCTURAL . .: 4 E 11 1. 1! 1 Lower Level Floor Area (Sq Ft, 0 00 + 1 2(050-,48 1 1 41 I ~ 1.18475/q 1 1 Main Level F oor Area t,Sc Ft) 129275 101 1 ' U PP .L LEY ? ' f : 1 1.1 Ale a i S C n ] 963 75 ' | Â£ tÂ· 1 Â· ~ p - -Ii,I~-.......... -4 4 11 Deck/Pore, Floor Area (Sc 1 : . 00 i ~' CONTRACTOR 12,6 50 ~ 11 Total Existing Floor Area {Sq Ft) .1 E Â· TBE) 25.25 sq It ' !| ~ < (1: 1 !Â»3Â«ZEâ‚¬11 j A*. Â· 50% EXEMPT PER'I ~ i_ , _~ ~ 10,1.201-1 DATED,Â·PUSLIOUTION 26 575 020.07 |~ '--1 - | 1 1-/ Proposed Floor Area Calculations 1. . : 1 i 100 101 1Â·- Â· : I 190 00 sq It < 4%\ 101 E Hallam St i ' EXISTING DECK 11 T'O BE REMOVED i M Proposed Main Levet Floor Area Calculations P Â· I Main Level Gross Floor Area (Sq Ft) 1200.50 1 1.11 . -- - 1 (~--~- - --250O0sqft--1 --1 r.-- -- 7 Â® 4,1 10; Common Building Gross Floor Area (Sq Ft) 108.00 I I Main Level Countable :Floor Area (Sq Ft) 1308.50 1 h . 9 ' r 7 1 L -' I 100% EXEMPT PE~ 0 \ / 1 11 26 57' .020 D. 7 Propased Garage Floor Area Calculations 1\' 1 1 1 11 SD lor22/14 HPC MINOR REV CONT Garage Gross Floor Area (Sq Ft) 27525 SD I 23.'14 ~HPC MINOR REVIEW 1 1 1 1 11 Garage Countable Floor Area (Sq Ft) 1263 26 757 020 D 7 /1 ~01 1 1 1 1 Garage Countable Floor Area (Sq Ft) 12.53 ' : ~ iÂ· ~ i li g ~ 5 ~ I O 29-4. . 4 - " 2 ''- PROJECT NO: 1411 ' i' 1' b ~CER-i) e 1 ; DRAWN BY. KPT Prop-d Declt/Parch Floor Area Calculations I Exempt per RDS 1 1 1 1 Front Porch Gross Floor Area (Sq Ft) 165 75 26 575 020 05 i ~ | 1 108 00 4 n ' COPYRIGHT FORUM PH:.LLC 108.30 :i 11 1 Deck Gross Floor Area (Sq Ft) (Main & Upper Levels) 261 50 15% of gross = 380 4 exempt , Deck/Po,cheountablefloo,Area(Sq Ft) 0,00 1 1.1 Total Proposed Floor Area Calculations 1 Lower Level Floor Area (Sq Ft) 4200 Main Level Floor Area (Sq Ft) 132113 1 lilli Upper Level Floor Area (Sq Ft) 1163 00 SHEETTITLE Deck/Porch Floor Area (Sq m Ow 1 1 1 1 -1 Total Proposed Floor Area (Sq Ft) 2,526.13 6 .0 0 8 0 PROPOSED MAIN LEVEL FAR 3/16Â·Â· = 1'.0" EXISTING MAIN LEVEL FAR 3/16 =1 -0 Z-005 7-7 N FLOOR AREA 148 CALCULATIONS PROPERTY LINE PROPERTY UNE 01-2/rk:- 7 1 1 T G)(i) (4 (3) 0 0 99 ..6- 1 11 SETBA;K LINE SETSApK LINE 715 West Main Street. Suite 204 i Aspen. Colorado 81611 1 1 1 1 P 970 279 4157 F 866 770 5585 1 11 101 E HALLAM 1 11 n (3Â» - - HALLAM LLC 101 E Hallam St 1 -Â«-0 _ Aspen, Colorado 81611 11 1 AREA EXEMPT PER | i AREA EXEMPT PER *-Â·Â·-26 575 050 D 3 FLOOR - - 26 575.050.D.3 FLOOR ' AREA <30" 1 ; AREA <30 1- 1 . - I FAR PLAN LEGEND 1 1,1 -1| 1 1 1 i ~ 1.7 i- 1 1 4 1 , 1 1 1 COUNTABLE FLOOR AREA .in=.=-0 r==iii 4--0----- r i L__1. IrmÂ«-i Â· ~ i' 1 I Â· 'i' i [Ff Y N. 14 , 2 I ' : :, 1 LI! 1 T---1 1 ~ EXEMPT FRONT PORCH .. 4 *rÂ· 1 '-T 11# :- r i CONSULTANTS ~ EXEMPT DECK 1-I 1, \ 1 11 11..... 11 E DN -1 , b /1 LI SURVEYOR Aspen Survey Engineers. Inc. ~ 50% EXEMPT - GARAGE ~ Aspen. Colorado 81611 â€¢â€¢ 1 (970) 925-3816 210 S Galina Street i I I, h- ..:1 -41 L--L. .;t---------- 1 21 W ~ 100% EXEMPT Â· GARAGE 1 1 - i l' aspensurveyofs(@g,nall coin 1\:, P >41.4 CIVIL 983.77 k , 1 1 . 1: G> - ' 1 ---4 E j TBO 1 2 i! AREA EXEMPT PER Existing Floor Area Calculations / 11630(44/ 1~ â€¢--26.57505003 FLOOR i AREA EXEMPT PER 101 E Hallam St +- 26 575 050 D 3 FLOOR 1: N AREA <30 ~Â· MECHANICAL AREA <30 1: 52 TBD 1~ 11 Existing Upper Level Floor Area Calculations Â· Â· / t.,Dip/ eve: GrOSS Floo. Afea (Sl Ft D;., -A ), 1 3 1~ : t 1 Upper Level Countable Floor Ar/a {Sq Ft) 963 75 6*-- - - - '-'-i"-2 r"% ~-.- = ~w ~ - - - - - -~ .... 11 STRUCTURAL Editing Deck/Porch Floor Area Calculations a ' ' ' 4 TBD i â€¢-not ne, RDS 1 1 ' !1 ... ...I' I ' i.1 // cm,Â·Â·Â· -câ€¢ Â·Iâ€¢ :5Â·:.5 -- Â·Â·Â· Al.a . '1/ FO .- .-Â· . ; , r.rÂ·--Â·&mr Â· Â·Â·1 3'd - Â·574, M -,roys - Bar 1 rÂ·ie#:rt . . 1 . Decldforch Countable Floor Area (Sq Ft) : 0.(,0 ~ ~ 0 Â· . .E 161.25 sql ft ! ' ~ : i :i CONTRACTOR i : Â·' : TED r ---I-'P Total E/sting Floor Area Calcubtions : -----! i----------0 1 i. 1,1 1 1 , 1292 75 Upper Leve FiooÂ· A[ea So F ) Deck/Porch Floor Area (Sq Fty | 0 '-0 i. 1 1 1014201: DATECFPULICATION Total Existing Floor Area (Sq Ft) - 2 256.50 - 1 Â· Â·1 1 - -- - ---3) 17 5, Proposed Floor Area Calculations 11 50 sqft 101 E Hallam St 250.00.54 R 1 SD 10/22/14 HPC MINOR REV CONT Proposed Main Level Floor Area Calculations ' 1 SD 9/23/14 HPC MINOR REVIEW Upper Level Gross Floor Area (Sq Ft) 116300 Upper Level Countable Floor Area (Sq Ft) 1163.00 PROJECT NO: 1411 ,-a===i==Â·=L== -=- -- --- - t (PÂ« --------------9.--,-----.---- ----- .................. --4 Proposed Deck/Porch Flow Area Calculations RAMEY. KPT ExemM per RDS Front Porch Floor Area (Sq Ft) 15525 26 575 020 D 5 i Â· COPYRIGHT FORUM PHI. LLC Deck Floor Area (Sq Ft) 26150 15% 01 gross = 380 4 exempt | | Deck/Porch Countable Floor Area (Sq Ft) O.Do ' Total Proposed Floor Area Calculations ~ Lower Level Floor Area (Sq Ft) 42 00 L . Â· Main Level Floor Area (Sq Ft) 1321.13 1 1 Upper Level Floor Area (Sq Ft) 1163 00 Deck'Porch Floor Area (Sq Ft) 0.00 Total Proposed Floor Area (Sq Ft) 2,526.:13 09 03(?1 (3 4; " _ SHEET TITLE =/ :P PROPOSED UPPER LEVEL FAR 3/16" = 1'-0 EXISTING UPPER LEVEL FAR 3/16 = 1'-0" Z-006 iR_E-7 N FLOOR AREA 148 CALCULATIONS PROPERTY LINE 9 (9* Zil GO - .2.,1. ' 25'4 0 V i 1 12'-71/7 9- 1 12 10.4.1- 1 -111.7 , 0 ..........11. *--]111 1. 1 .1 I , SETBAÂ·_K LINE 715 West Main Steel Suite 204 Aspen, Colorado 81611 P 970279.4157 F. 866 770 5585 Il i 101 E HALLAM HALLAM LLC 101 E Hallam St Aspen, Colorado 81611 It IIi 009 1I " IL-J-----~~ M:.19" ~ Â«> 011 It CONSULTANTS REC ROOM 1 . li 001 09 1 SURVEYOR dj- f Â·0 cONC 88' i~~ PWDR Aspen Survey Eng,lieers. Inc 1 ICE 210 S Galina Street Aspen Colorado 81611 L j (970) 925-3816 aspensurveyofs@ginail com 14 , CIVIL . 1-BD 111 1 1 ~ b ~, Â·â€¢423 MECHANICAL TBD P !1 1 Ne - Ii ' i STRUCTURAL 11 LL--1 TBD 1 7-11 11 - BEDROOM 03 3 000 . CONTRACTOR TED IRADON =EÂ¥==4 oil 1 1 0.-16 1 0 CLOSET I Cob ~ W 10 14/2014 DATE OF PUBLICATION 1 - ' 017 1 1 e- - --1 - 1 - I cgEf -j-- - t - - - - ' --t f-===._, ,.8--- i JEED BATH U. ' ' i. /17 6 SD 10/22/14 HPC MINOR REV CONT a ED 9/21'14 HPC MINOR REVIEW 1 I i Â® 1 1 --- PROJECT NO: 1411 DRAWNI BY. KPT COPYRIGHT FORUM PHI LLC WALL LEGEND 1 1 1 [3 EXISTING WALLTO REMAIN ~ ~ J . ~ EXISTING WALLTO BE | ~ 1 RE-SIDED L_J NEW WALL. ~i~ . .u, v c- U) (32 21 11 ,-- A SHEET TITLE 73 WALL TO DEMO : PROPOSED LOWER LEVEL 3/16" = 1'.0 NO EXISTING LOWER LEVEL Z-101 UN-~--3 N 14 8 16 * FLOOR PLANS PROPERTY LINEE PROPERTY LINE 0 /-- n (4} (51 (T)GUSI :Â·.:.Â·0* 1,. 1 + 4 7 TV T T f 12.-710 91/4. 6~ 10Â·-0' 4 - â€¢â€¢=-- -h-â€¢AE=-4.---Â·..-â€¢Â·,~.~-~~*g~~,:diu- SETEA~K LINE SETEApK UNE ~ 715 West Main Street. Suite 204 i Aspen' Colorado 81â‚¬11 1 1 li P. 970.279.4157 F: 866 770 5585 1 Ill 111 i i 101 E HALLAM HALLAM LLC ' ' 4._ 1 -__ . _._ _ ..___ --__ _ _~F ) 101 E Hallam St 1-L___~ FR 2 !:4---J---~~~~--1--Â·.....~ 2+.,,~ F* - Aspen. Colorado 81611 (4. P 4Â»9- - : L =2 8 --~ ~ UVING 1 L--2 F N Lia e - A N . -- E==i 3 3 .1 1 CONSULTANTS 11. L--87-1 1 14 L ~ SURVEYOR Aspen Survey Engineers. Inc 210 S Galina Street 777-71 ' Aspen, Colorado 81611 U -- U - (970) 925-3816 1 aspensurveyofs@gmali.coin PWDR 110 , r 1-1 i ravi L F' ....i 221â„¢ ' CIVIL 0:8 - , TBD EXTERIOR 1 ~ 7---ra-Â¥1--1 WALLS i 1 6 6==gh====17 1 [INING 1 NORTH OF Irt.7 102 : LINE ARE / U- ...44 MECHANICAL I . 1 EXISTING TO /A t.:/ . i /354 8 0 ~ REMAIN ~ ~ v ...j h/6 9 ' 9 TBD __3 i I SEE 1 6 11 1 [~ 1 1 ELEVATIONS F w I Z-201 & 2- 9 19 ~ 202 1 1Â»--3 Â«f i~11 1. . (RÂ» 1-- -Â«-- -4-,----- -- IMEL-=.--193.2- -- ---- --1)f) \ Ill 1 -r .T-- U 1 KITCHEN -1 ] 11- 1 9 12 1 }ATRY STRUCTURAL TBD I n : N CONTRACTOR LM E ! 1 60 112 1 1 --~ (f>- - 9 - b-f=f-- ---2~1 - -r- - ---9,%2-6 ~__ _ _ _ _ _ _~~1_ _ ____ _ __~:) L DEMO 'Â·j L., ~- - I 111 ~ RAD<ON ~ \, KU gLE--1 ~ 7 9 L vEN i PIPE DEMO--~ .. 16,~1,1 DATE OF PUBUGIG1ON -1 1, LAUNDRY/MUDROOM E ~ I ~00 1 -2 1 GARAGE 1 DEMO-: P 11 Ill 1 (ff; I F 15 .I e ! 1 V : 1.- ------t I SD | 10/22/14 HPC MINOR REV CONT i i i SD 1 9/23Â·14 HPC MINOR REVIEW 101 . 5'0- I , 1 r. 1 r\ 1 PROJECT NO: 1411 1 3 101 -W--6-6 - DRAWN BY. KPT [ 1 ~ - --------~----------------------- ------- - --- - ---- -- --- - --- i. ~ ' COPYRIGHT FORUM PHI. LLC C*MMON COMMON WALL LEGEND , BWILDING BUILDING EXISTING WALL TO REMAIN I g 1 EXISTING WALL TO SE 1 I ] I RE-SIDED NEW WALL SHEET TITLE 1 1 1 o 0 19 04 04 WALL TO DEMO Z-102 PROPOSED MAIN LEVEL 3/16- = 1'.0 EXISTING MAIN LEVEL 3/16" = 1'-0" 1 FLOOR PLANS N 1 4 8 16 ~ 9'Â·101/2, 11'-6- 2&2* PROPERTY LINE PROPERTY LINE 8 1 9 + (7) a , m 90 / TX 1 i f tÂ« 25'+4' 12'-7~~. 1 I 91.4 L i 10Â·-04' 1'-Ill'- 1. 1 1 1 11 SETUA DK LINE , SETE|ACK LINE 715 West Main Street. Suite 204 i i Â· Aspen Colorado 81611 1 1 1 P 970.279.4157 F. 866 770 5585 1 1 1 1 4 1 j 101 E HALLAM (32 f - - HALLAM LL 101 E Hallam St Aspen, Colorado 81611 >212 ' f CLOSET ' 1 L 203 BEDROOM, ~ i 201 - 1 Ir-- ' ' k" 1 I N ' 4 , 21114 21/ lr-/ -/,19 ~- --7 9= i ' Ll.-_~~~ 1 11 \ hy,Â·t ~ 1 , 11 P ' 111 P 1 11 I. 111 SHOWE1 2 121 - , E. vo 741' it> al= r 132 ~ prbll=4.Lit AL-_- 1,-- CONSULTANTS r-7/ 629 1 Â». I i lulu I SURVEYOR SHOWER |1 U I ON /. WC 1 Aspen Survey Engineers. Inc 1 d Aspen, Colorado 81611 1=J . tri 210 S Galena Street _ -'/28 219 61J~~ 'ia, i =====6 2==11 f[=5Fri=i 1 (970) 925-3816 1 aspensurveyofs@gmail coin / 1.--1 / Â· - >2 1 4 CIVIL ' E - TBD 1- - --- O-----,f-Â«D â‚¬2 1 - - - -~ - --4 E) bâ„¢ 20.0 , 4~~2 -! / CLOSET | i f MASTER BATH ' | 2% 11 1 1 111 U L 41 #1 4--*.: 0 - ~~~7 / 1 1 TBD MECHANICAL P >216 1 -71)- ..1 - --121-22 -i--08-U===r-----3-- CLOSET T---0 (3>-- -L-- 1.===4 - --- -- -1, r 11 STRUCTURAL / ~,1.. 1 ~j- -. 1 EXTERIOR WALLS , 11 TBD i NORTH OF LINE AREE . 1 1 11 1-7 L- EXISTING TO REMAIN 1 SEE ELEVATIONS 4 1 1 1 2-201&2Â·202 1 CONTRACTOR 1 1 1 11 ll _ TBD G DEMOU 1 /'11< R 201 ..I-/ 1 L : 1 MASTER BEDROOM ~ r 204 1014.r2014 DATE OP PUBLICATION E LINE OF 1 1 1 /. 1 -ROOF L- DEMO ~ : ABOVE IL-c==-1 7 0 1 2- 04 A SD 10/22/14 HPCMINOR REV CONT , SD 9/23/14 HPC MINOR REVIEW ROOF DECK , PROJECT NO. 1411 ' -49 â‚¬Â» ------------Â·------ --~ -- --1------/' 1 ...10 DRAWN BY. KPT 1 1 ' COPYRIGHT FORUM PHI LLC WALL LEGEND 1 ~~_J EXISTING WALLTO REMAIN 11 ~ EXISTING WALL To BE 1 1 1 1 RE-SIDED ~ , L_| NEW WALL -rr'AFr (21'1 06 ' SHEET TITLE 0 [3 WALLTO DEMO PROPOSED UPPER LEVEL 3/16" = 1'-D" EXISTING UPPER LEVEL 3/16rl = Z-103 rul_.2-1 N FLOOR PLANS 148 9 10'9 11'.6 PROPERTY LINE PROPERTY LINE . t> T uÂ»--m- a GR r r V, : I SETEA SK LINE ~ SETEACK LINE 715 West Main Streel. Suite 204 Aspen,Colorado 81611 1 1 P 970.279 4157 F 866 770 5585 1 EXES'ING FLAT ROOF I E .1.Off.D FOR DPA:NAIE 1 1 101 E HALLAM 1 HALLAM LLC - 101 E Hallam St Aspen, Colorado 81611 â‚¬>- - EFE Nra-- ' -WEE pify- I EASTING EC>OF 1 U -cia To REMAi' 22 i1212 t.= 1/////10 39 CONSULTANTS \ SURVEYOR 18 NFGh Aspen Survey Engineers Inc , 11Â® 210 S Galena Stieet (970 925-3816 Aspen. Colorado 81611 aspensurveyors@ginall.corn CIVIL 4-) : Â© TBD EXTE RIOR 7~ NORTH OF WALLS , LINE ARE L.1-k rf1212r EXISTING TO 2 1 4,261 MECHANICAL ' ~- REMAIN ~. V TBD 07 , SEE .' ELEVATIONS Z-201 hZ r 202 1----1 0 0 0 1 i TBD ---- ~ STRUCTURAL DE.O --4 4 -2 i . LIE OF 1~Â« FF)J- 4 1 --------- DEMO CONTRACTOR MIER t EVEL TBD RE- 1 5 1 4 , (C) 1 | DEMO- ~ I DEMOÂ»LJ I 1 111 10Â·42'4 DATE OFP:JELICATION â‚¬> 1 1 (ID 6 ./ 1 - NEW ROOF DECK [ EPED FOR DRAINAGE SD 10/22/14 HPC MINOR REV CONT 1 I . SD 9,23,Â·14 HPC MINOR REVIEW 1 ' 1 FTOREMAIN 1 DRAWN BY . KPT EXISTING ROOF 1 cyÂ» ------.------------ ---- -1- ----- ---<Â© PROJECT NO: 1411 t* ~ 1 '{â€žifil COPYRIGHT FORUM PHI LLC ROOFLEGEND 43 1 47 L,_.1 EXISTING ROOF TO REMAIN ' 1 11 1 11 â€¢ LIJ NEW METAL ROOF ~ NEW ROOF DECK j 1 1 1*+ CD(3 4 + <26/ c.).- SHEET TITLE 0 0 7 3 Roof TODEMO PROPOSED ROOF PLAN 3/16" = 1'Â· D EXISTING ROOF PLAN 316 =10 Z-1 04 17~3 N ROOF PLAN 148 Ir $64 :11;... 1/4,~ 4/: 1 1 I,Z.A * - J. I. ~ Â·'Â· ; .ul~h~~ I ts - = - F=Â© 715 West Main Street. Suite 204 INE O. PREVIOUS , LINE OF PRE'VIOU' Aspen, Colorado 81611 AOL),riON ADDITiON P. 970.279,4157 F: 866 770 5585 j/~\ 7 404 101 E HALLAM HALLAM LLC , 101 E Hailam St 1 Aspen, Colorado 81611 - -11 1- -- PÂ· jij y : F-It E c.Â»41 i j d. 1 I li lit-<ft. 1 %1 E U EU~=imt ~ ~: r 1 1 - CONSULTANTS SURVEYOR Aspen Suivey Engineers Inc 210 S Galina Street Aspen, Colorado 81611 (970) 925-3816 aspensurveyoTs@gmaii coin CIVIL TBD MECHANICAL TBD 2X EXISTING EAST ELEVATION 3/1611 = 1.-0 1X EXISTING NORTH ELEVATION 3/16~ = 1-0 STRUCTURAL TBD LiNE OF PREVOUS 6.-9 - ADDITiON *c22@ 1 _ LINE OF PREVOUS EXISTÂ·NO EXISTING CONTRACTOR ADDITION RIDGE HEIGIT 4 - RIDGE HEIGHT <A TBD /91 \ 123 8 /F 9 123Â·8'Vii- / PROPOSED)1 \ CEDAR SHENGLE 494 R./F. le MATCH . 14 EXISTING CEDAR EXISTING / r SHINGLE. ROOF 1 1, 4.r ..1 REELIDE EXi'ST!NG 1 UPPER LEVEL M 73 1.~ 1 0, 14'201Â· DATE OF P/8/CATION PROPOSED ~ CEDAR SHINGLE CEDAR SHINGLE SIOING TOBI B : ~ | ~ EXISTING CEDAR S-}ING ,// PAINTED SAWN CEDAR : SHINGLE ROOF EXISTING IC,UND ]/fit/ SHiNGLE, re BE FLAT ROOF SLOPED rp FOR DRAINAGE FLATROOFSLOPED PAINTED .-: 7 EXISTING : FOR DRA,NAGE 1 . i EX:STING Â»==.1 i L~6 --~ 1 UPPERLE'/1 0 . UPPER LEVEL /6 ' 109-4 "ll ./ 4% 11 =Im SD 10/22/1/ UPCMINORREVCONT . Ld EXISTING BRiCK i : FACADE FACADE SD 9/23/14 ~HFC MINOR REVIEW 1 j ! aull: 1 ..1 L_ Â·LJ PROJECT NO: 1411 1 1 1 E>ISTING ---- - - - EXISTING KPT 1 li i MAIN LEVEL 16 i I 1004'=7892-71' 1 -00 0".7 7, C MAiN LEVEL r, DRAWN By. Ill 11 1 1 1 COPYRIGHT FORUM PH!. LLC i I 1 I [ 1 Ir 1 1 1 : 1 t 1: 1 1 L I 1-----I ' LOWERLEVEL i Lo,m? LEVEL A 11 80-9 f L /6.9 1 SHEET TITLE Z-201 2 PROPOSED EAST ELEVATION 3/16" = 1-0" 1 PROPOSED NORTH ELEVATION 3/16- = 1'-0" ELEVATIONS HPC AxÂ»m=:8Â«2Â»9:** x . r I. 11 LINE OF PREV:OUS 7-1 Rf ADDITiON 715 West Main Street. Suite 204 Aspen, Coloiado 81611 P 970.279 4157 F. 866 770 5585 , 2 ,/~li Â«1111 1,\\ i I 1 :-fld Ll_j 223 1% 101 E HALLAM [-41 .~ 3 32./:1. HALLAM LLC ":71 :Pill 101 E Hallam St --4% /REVI''SADDITION 1111,1 , 1 ' .1 11 Aspen, Colorado 81611 Ru~LN i lili ' F==t' 1 = J// [77'7 - & 1 1 .1 / #/UN'Â·1:. 1 !-1~4!11.: T,FI ' ~111 1;411144 Fl~I 11|I 11 G.' i . : t. - 44Â¥pg ki 1- 1 '! E --- la . 1 ..1 - 1 P - TIll '1 1 1:; ~ 12; ~ h 9 - 1 li 1 1 1 - i- CONSULTANTS SURVEYOR Aspen Survey Engineers. Inc 210 S Galena Street Aspen. Colorado 81611 (970) 925-3816 aspensurveyors@ginail coin CIVIL TBD MECHANICAL TBD 4X EXISTING WEST ELEVATION 3/16" = 1'.0 3X EXISTING SOUTH ELEVATION 3/16" = 1Â·.0 STRUCTURAL TBD LINE OF PREVious EXISTING CONTRACTOR 723 ADIf T ION RIDGE HEIGHT 4 , ./ '1.0 123Â·8 VÂ·F | 123 8' V. 9 RIDGE HEIGHT 1 -TB[) Â· PROPOSED'/DAR./Â·GLE RÂ«)FTOMATCH EXISTING ~r-Alf~.1 ..C'll RESIDE EXISTING ' ' , UPPER LEVEL. 10,14214 DATE OF PUBLICATION 22Ak#2. 1 % / . SIDING - Of. 1- Si DÂ·NG ........ . .......â€ž........ ... .............._... PROPOSED PROPOSEDCE.ARSHÂ·NOLE 2- 1-4 1 - CEDAR SHiNGLE .': F.31 ''Â·Â·Â·-Â·Â·~ l<~~ .. EXISTING CEDAR Â£ 121 i iE]i //6\ POSTS WD ff].1 7 EXISTING SHAKE SHINGLE SHINGLE ROOF PROPOSED , M 1 r-- N.gPIC. E RAILING ./.D EXISTING ME.TAL RAÂ·Â· ~ ~ > 1 1 rp~EVEL 4 / UPPER LEVEL ,-6 r - ------&' --- A--e~--\ \\ \ I 109-4Â· 917 91' 1=== 1 5J. ' PROPOSED EXISTING BR:Ch SD 10/22'14 APC MINOR REVCONT .. 11 y f.i F-A<JADE . Â· [337 -1-T- i ir-1 I 4 SD 9/2314 ~HPC MINOR REVIEW - 11""1111 12 1 - 444 SIDING t ' 11621 . 1 Â· 'il J I Â· 1 lEi PROJECT NO: 1411 EX'ST'NG EXISTNG / MAIN LEVEL 4 A,MAIN LEvEL i iNTELZEN 1 i DRAWNI BY KPT 100Â·0=7892Â·Â·7"' 9 i I 100Â·/27'll.'I i 1 1 COPYRIGHT FORUM PHI LLC 1 1 L____1 1 LOVER LEVEL ,~ I 69/ .* 0 - 1 1 88Â£ P . - L. ~ SHEET TITLE Z-202 4 PROPOSED WEST ELEVATION 3/16*= 1'-0- 3 PROPOSED SOUTH ELEVATION 3/16" = 1.-0 ELEVATIONS HPC .. . :24:'.1 .9,1,/...i'.241 :. . ..Wm<42 1 '04~ 1 4 ./ ... 1 I .. '.4. l i. , 1 '*4 A . 9 1 0. . ii '' .?:., .i~ - a. , , 1 /1.-4 1 I . .4/* 11 #/b ' *i ~ J.A Y . 24'E f. 0 12 .U'. 4.. - ' 2, 't ... 4; fl ~ 4 1 1 4 ~i ~ ~ 1 2 b -/1/FfET 4 .Illi.~7 *~m" 2 /'Mrsi Im ' 13~ 2-- --- -7 4/ + - CIAL- -- - * . . 0- I - 0 1 I.I. 0 .... .- I.- . ..I. ....... .. ... 1, .+ 1 1 3Â·/ Â¢Â·/ Â« art : "?#2'1 ~Â· 6..Â· 'Ui./*~ â€¢; Â· Â·* ,~Â·. ,'t 4-Irfip' Â· *422#i /2Â·Â·Â·Â·rÂ·,f,*MR),TÂ·. a---~1-v.. =Â· --C I -- * - , 1.% 91~Ir I,t.- 7, -- F.,1, a .1 - . -1 : e**07 4 *. Â·-rp: 4 0 4#3 04'' . *42 3 20*2 n rv *rj<lf:4'-14,4 1.*.,TJW 0 .0.Â» t..:cy,Â·an 7-331*~ 510' ./.4*. 2 9 ,- -3--. :' 4 - .. --tÂ·~Â·,i~ ~Â·Â·LaÂ·~.Â¢4.:~jEÂ¥*~ j ~Â· , .79".4 ' 00'E . 7..r, ---2 .. 6 ---4. ...eys. 1% -7â€¢ .Â· /.LiÂ·~. ,- Â·Â· ,-Ce 1.'Â·: ~3 *f?,p'. Si . ~ -'r ';4 iliÂ·? ~~~'01/ M =46--~~--2**~f'*Wi /2--LE -U~~*,9";~ + 92---- ,1'iiÂ·*,1~2 . ..1:..>4,6Vdfi.9 1 A>â€ž1~.. iÂ«fri .. . 14 1 -7 4 .AA. & Ell *'r:, MI'U" F.66+14 ._ 1'â€¢--4 .-- I - 4,/4 ~- .:Â·r - - -_ - mma ..... 1 i =/ ~- l U< , . . --4.1-.1- ---- ..... - 1 - - - 1 - . . . . - I /- I. . .... . A 'I i ~UG' Â· 4 K . .e ft I. vÂ·.1&6.Jif.. . ~~4*:;~~~~ j~, :.- 13Â·'~ .94Â«~4t~~1- +%... . -0 ..~ 2 ;~~~~' . 1 - Ill. $#.041*5/1,/4 6.,UÂ©44- V 4&14540#1/,1,4, -Â·{ 414*fmt. I -44 -th,4-4*20.ki--4~ 44/79#2,aL F . . I . ' Â·Il :-â€¢ le 19691* I ) - *" a 'm~~19,..31- 4-1.W,~:.'.2- r . '121?. ..:. >21 '4. i dp j ,Â· 4,?i.444* 1,Â¥ . .Mt 9- r t. I *â€¢&<: ,~~ Â·. ..7Â£â€¢~~ 6 -3 A i. '113''P)' 2 - '-MAÂ· ....7: Â·-Â· .44Â¥1* ~ 34...: .... .' 9.4 in/2.31 .71 ?,c fltbr / -015-â€¢Fp= 2 , .trfb:, A.4. ;4,- .. - *M,$*:4'.f .4 -. ... .. Â£ uÂ·1 1,Â· - , 11 , tr 4 - 9 , -- lar.Â¥.. / . - . 0 . *ir,- - Â· 4. -7;49.2, 1*: . 1 -r - 11 . . - - 11 : . - - 1. : . - - .. ... .. ... .. ... . A. l' f. 6 I. 1 I ./ . C 14.4 ; I . 0 .A 1. 1 .. 4 9% . : - -4 . ... - 141 0 0 Fl 3.1 Â·- $ 4 4% I * #/Twili-..i.0/000,0.94:106 . A .. 0 1 0 ....0 1 1. -.. ....0 1 ,- .: . . . I . .....0 . 1; .4 ..f- .0.. A , =. t . 1#26 ./ ': <3 . I--#i L -1-).- ft.i.10 . . Â· 4, 0 . 4 , ..4- -5.*=ts-6 Lf:tak 4. , 1 + - - r,, ~~ 0,- Â·+, 311-Â·4 -: - 2+.' 0 -/4 - .t.,4 tti21 1 .1-39: 9.21.' :A . rk 4* , , 1 2- 4, Â·r I ~: / . .1- - . V 4. - . 6, - - =/F/9t'~4 r --- , 90.- Brol:' :.:,6 il/b,3*.9 .. r33â‚¬4/4 f - 11 M.; 4 -1/di........../.blk." ike =; il -7*77756:4.5 - A--im, '- I .% 0 .. r: I.kir' ' , I . -1. .:Ittz?ill"Milliz.. , - 1 1 - ~~lalâ€¢~tg~~1â€¢~~~1~ - -T'.5 .9 - â€¢ 'J . 1: -44.1 6,18:iM-#Ul. ..- 4--4,4------ ' * ., ...Â·W:T~t<--â‚¬ - r- i j AY#- ~~â€ž 1 . . . .-4.-Â·:!NhiE:.:.611-1 ' *Irtlfkw, ~ 2* .L#.45 ~I~~ . -C. 1:UND:=: 2:3:EZZ@GR~ 22&50. . 4. 9 '1 21) 44 . - :@4635~32*=2=== ==e=@b *- , <Jâ‚¬.1 N 1 to. :,UG:-â€¢{2*EMBE;60#=7---1 --1.-0-- @lp . --ulle;~g00*52 *--G+n=--- / 2 7 4.' 'J ., 14..1...... ~901 %Â».=L '' 7 . 7---. . 1 - Ill. L . . I .- - .. I-: I I.. . .:...., A -1 r 0 1 1 1. . I. .. 1'-mmii= AFFIDAVIT OF PUBLIC NOTICE REQUIRED BY SECTION 26.304.060 (E),ASPEN LAND USE CODE ADDRESS OF PROPERTY: lot F *ALLANA , Aspen, CO SCHEDULED PUBLIC HEARING DATE: WEDÂ· Set:'[ 24 , 20 14 STATE OF COLORADO ) ) SS. Countv of Pitkin ) I. 61322 V \Al iLSOrd (name. please print) being or representing an Applicant to the City of Aspen. Colorado. hereby personally certify that I hape complied with the public notice requirements of Section 26.304.060 (E) of the Aspen Land Use Code in the following manner: C,ry Publication ofnotice: By the publication in the legal notice section of an official paper ora paper of general circulation in the City of Aspen at least fifteen (15) days prior to the public hearing. il copy of the publication is attached hereto. 60 Posting of notice: By posting of notice. which form was obtained from the Community Development Department. which was made of suitable. waterproof materials, which was not less than tuenty-two (22) inches wide and twenty-six (26) inches high. and which was composed of letters not less than one inch in height. Said notice was posted at least fifteen (15) days prior to the public hearing on the -A_ day of St pr . 20 14 . to and including the date and time of the public hearing. A photograph of the posted notice (sign) is unached hereto. SU) Ahii/ing of notice. By the mailing of a notice obtained from the Community- Development Department. which contains the information described in Section 26.304.060(E)(2) of the Aspen Land Use Code. At least fifteen (15) days prior to the public hearing. notice was hand delivered or mailed by first class postage prepaid U.S. mail to all owners of properly within three hundred (300) feet of the property subject to the development application. The names and addresses 01 property owners shall be those on the current tax records of Pitkiii County as the> appeared no more tlian sixty (60) days prior to the date of the public hearing. .1 copy ofthe owners und gorerninental agencies so noticed is attached hereto. WA Neighborhood ()1111'each: Applicant attests that neighborhood outreach. summarized and attached. was conducted prior to the first public hearing as required in Section 26.304.035. Neighborhood Outreach. A copy of /he neighborhood outreach summary, including the method ofpublic notification and a copy otany documentation thal was presented to the public is anached hereto. (continued on next page) 9IA Mineral Estate Owner No/ice, By the certified mailing of notice. return receipt requested. to affected mineral estate owners by at least thirty (30) days prior to the date scheduled for the initial public hearing on the application of development. The names and addresses of mineral estate owners shall be those on the current tax records of Pitkin County. At a minimum. Subdivisions, PDs that create more than one lot. and new Planned Developments are subject to this notice requirement. 'AIA Rezoning or lext amendment. Whenever the official zoning district map is iii an> way to be changed or amended incidental to or as part ola general revision ofthis Title. or whenever the text of this Title is to be amended. whether such revision be made by repeal of this Title and enactment of a new land use regulation. or otherwise. the requirement of an accurate survey map or other sufficient legal description of, and the notice to and listing of names and addresses of owners of real property in the area of the proposed change shall be waived. However. the proposed zoning map shall be available for public inspection in the planning agency during all business hours for fifteen (15) days prior to the public hearing on such amendments. '*7141 Signature (390 The foregoing 'Affidavit of Notice" was acknowledged before me this I uay of *-*8.-TY,ber .20\4. by 9),4-2 4 .\Nt,\ser\ WITNESS MY I LAND AND OFFICIAL SEAL JENNIFER M. WRIGHT NOTARY PUBUC My cop*ssion expires: ck\\Lj \5 004 STATE OF COLORADO )\ NOTARY ID #20134043266 My Commission Expires July 15, 2017 / Notary Ig~lic .../ < ATTACHMENTS AS APPLICABLE: â€¢COPÂ¥ OF THE PUBLICATION â€¢PHOTOGRAPH OF THE POSTED NOTICE (SIGN) â€¢ LIST OF THE OWNERS AND GOVERNMENTAL AGENCIES NOTICED BY MAIL â€¢ APPLICANT CERTIFICATION OF MINERAL ESTAE OWNERS NOTICE AS REQUIRED BY C.R.S. Â§24-65.5-103.3 111 WEST FRANCIS LLC 114 EAST BLEEKER STREET ASSOC ,20 EAST MAIN PARTNERS LLC 28 ROCK RIDGE AVE COMMON AREA 120 E MAIN ST GREENWICH, CT 06831 114 E BLEEKER ST ASPEN, CO 81611 ASPEN, CO 81611 BRADY WILLIAM JB 111 BROCKWAY LEXIE CITY OF ASPEN 14671 FIELDSTONE DR 7714 FISHER ISLAND DR 130 S GALENA ST SARATOGA, CA 95070 FISHER ISLAND, FL 33109-0966 ASPEN, CO 81611 COLLINS CINDA REV TRUST CRAWFORD RANDALL & ABIGAIL DOMINGUE FAMILY TRUST 42 PARK LN 124 N GARMISCH ST PO BOX 2293 MINNEAPOLIS, MN 55416 ASPEN, CO 81611 WINTER PARK, FL 32790 DTJ LEGACY PROPERTIES LLC ERWIN GREGORY D GARCIA STEVEN J 202 W 19TH ST PO BOX 4470 120 N GARMISCH EL DORADO, AR 71730 BASALT, CO 81621 ASPEN, CO 81611 GARMISCH LODGING LLC GSW FAMILY INV LP HENRY FREDERICK B TRUST 110 W MAIN ST 1320 HUNSICKER RD 100 W HALLAM ST ASPEN, CO 81611 LANCASTER, PA 17601 ASPEN, CO 81611 HOGUET CONSTANCE M JAMMB LLC JOHNSON RICHARD & MONTAE IMBT 333 E 68TH ST 500 S DIXIE HWY STE 201 6820 BRADBURY NEWYORK, NY 10065 CORAL GABLES, FL 33146 DALLAS, TX 75230 KRUMM DONALD PAUL REV TRUST LANDIS CAROLYN MOUNTAIN STATE PROPERTIES LLC PO BOX 874 128 N GARMISCH ST 715 10TH ST SOUTH ASPEN, CO 81612 ASPEN, CO 81611 NAPLES, FL 34102 PARDUBA JIRI PENN PAUL E & SUSAN W RODNEY JOHN W 116 N GARMISCH ST 3830 E 79TH ST 8536 N GOLF DR ASPEN, CO 81612 INDIANAPOLIS, IN 46260-3457 PARADISE VALLEY, AZ 85253 ROSE BRANDON SARDY HOUSE NEW LLC SPEARS NANCY M 625 MT HOPE RD 240 CRANDON BLVD #167 PO BOX 2630 WHARTON, NJ 07885 KEY BISCAYNE, FL 33149 ASPEN, CO 81612 WOLKENMUTH EDWARD F JR & STEELE ZATS JULIE JULIANNE BELL REV TRUST 118 N GARMISCH 121 W BLEEKER ST ASPEN, CO 81611 ASPEN, CO 81611 A-9 S . AFFIDAVIT OF PUBLIC NOTICE REQUIRED BY SECTION 26.304.060 (E), ASPEN LAND USE CODE ADDRESS OF PROPERTY: )01 E ]4016-,ra , Aspen, CO SCHEDULED PUBLIC HEARING DATE: Wd <51 7 Gur .2 5 I 002 ry-~ , 201-4 STATE OF COLORADO ) ) SS. County of Pitkin ) I, Av-1-ela. Soc------~ (name, please print) being or representing an Applicant to the City of Aspen, Colorado, hereby personally certify that I have complied with the public notice requirements of Section 26.304.060 (E) o f the Aspen Land Use Code in the following maImer: 4~Publication of notice. By the publication in the legal notice section of an official paper or a paper of general circulation in the City of Aspen at least fifteen (15) days prior to the public hearing. A copy of the publication is attached hereto. Posting of notice: By posting of notice, which form was obtained from the Community Development Department, which was made of suitable, waterproof materials, which was not less than twenty-two (22) inches wide and twenty-six (26) inches high, and which was composed of letters not less than one inch in height. Said notice was posted at least fifteen (15) days prior to the public hearing on the day of , 20 , to and including the date and time of the public hearing. A photograph of the posted notice (sign) is attached Â·hereto. Mailing of notice. By the mailing of a notice obtained from the Community Development Department, which contains the information described in Section 26.304.060(E)(2) of the Aspen Land Use Code. At least fifteen (15) days prior to the public hearing, notice was hand delivered or mailed by first class postage ,-- Z~.UNIT<I ' prepaid U.S. mail to all owners of property within three hundred (300) feet of the 6,t-~J' 19â€¢,I 'it: ,- Â· property subject to the development application. The nones and addresses of (_iii/'ii;: , A). property owners shall be those on the current tax records of Pitkin County as they 9 7,Â·ri:,)0,1.,t'Â·t :., 21., appeared no more than sixty (60) days prior to the date of the public hearing. A copy ofthe owners and governmental agencies so noticed is attached hereto, Neighborhood Outreach: Applicant attests that neighborhood outreach, summarized and attached, was conducted prior to the first public hearing as required in Section 26.304.035, Neighborhood Outreach. A copy of the neighborhood outreach summary, including the method ofpublic notilication and a copy ofally documentation that was presented to the public is attached hereto. (continued on next page) 44 4 Mineral Estate Owner Notice. By the certified mailing of notice, return receipt requested, to affected mineral estate owners by at least thirty (30) days prior to the date scheduled for the initial public hearing on the application of development. The names and addresses of mineral estate owners shall be those on the current tax records of Pitkin County. At a minimum, Subdivisions, SPAs or PUDs that create more than one lot, new Planned Unit Developments, and new Specially Planned Areas, are subject to this notice requirement. Rezoning or text amendment. Whenever the official zoning district map is in any ~ way to be changed or amended incidental to or as part of a general revision of this Title, or whenever the text of this Title is to be amended, whether such revision be made by repeal of this Title and enactment of a new land use regulation, or otherwise, the requirement of an accurate survey map or other sufficient legal description of, and the notice to and listing of names and addresses of owners of real property in the area of the proposed change shall be waived. However, the proposed zoning map shall be available for public inspection in the planning agency during all business hours for fifteen (15) days prior to the public hearing on such amendments. ./ 5 c- Signature The foregoing "Affidavit of Notice" was acknowledged before me this 4 day of Syk- , 20/4.3 by ,+706 56-Â£-A--Â·-7 WITNESS MY HAND AND OFFICIAL SEAL My commission expires: .3((011(/2 Uwk Ed- rn -1 3**- Notary Public i KAREN REED PATTERSON3 ~ NOTARY PUBLIC 1 ~ STATE OF COLORADO ~ ~ NOTARY ID #19964002767 1 ATTACHMENTS AS APPLICABLE: Lzze==!=5*res February 15, 2016 1 â€¢ COPY OF THE PUBLICATION â€¢ PHOTOGRAPH OF THE POSTED NOTICE (SIGN) e LIST OF THE OWNERS AND GOVERNMENTALAGENCIES NOTICED BY MAIL â€¢ APPLICANT CERTIFICATION OF MINERAL ESTAE OWNERS NOTICE AS REQUIRED BY C.R.S. Â§24-65.5-103.3 PUBLIC NOTICE RE:101 E. HALLAM- MINOR DEVELOPMENT AND TEMPORARY RELOCAnON NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that a public hearing will be held on Wednesday, September 24, 2014, at a meeting to begin at 5:00 p.m. before the As- pen Historic Preservation Commission, in Council Chambers, Citv Hall, 130 S. Galena St., Aspen. HPCwiN consider an application submitted by Hal- lam LLC, represented by Forum Phi Architecture, with consent of the property owner, Patricia Gor man, 101 E. Hallam Street, Aspen, CO 81611. Thâ‚¬ applicant requests Minor Development to construcl a new addition to the existing Victorian house, and Temporary Relocation to underpin and excavate a basement beneath the house. The property is leÂ· gally described as 101 E. Hallam, Lot A and thi west 4.86 of Lot B, Block 65, City and Townsite o Aspen, PID# 2735-124-37-001. The applicant re guests setback variances on the east, west, rea and combined yards for existing and new construc tion, and a reduction of the required distance be tween the house and existing shed. For turther in- formation, contact Amy Simon at the City of Aspen Community Development Department, 130 S. Ga- lena St., Aspen, CO. (970) 429-2758, amy,simon@cityofaspen.com. 8/Jav Maytin Chafr, Aspen Historic Preservation Commission Published in the Aspen Times on September 4, 2014 Published in the Aspen Times Weekty on Septem- ber 4,2014.(10514803) 17.2 4 4 <0 ,Â« 3 , W -3 11<4////////61.; i i:f- 5, â€ž .. 'im *41%/'T'r e.. tril. 'N. . 4,0/ , )44 . I ' ' :044 ../ . I t. f I Â·r ' - .9 i =,mry,t , 1 0 0 2*'11{'. 91. 1.j 111 1, 1 . t. 1.41 4 1. 4~Off . 6- â€ž1 -- Â·Â·f.?kÂ·* - 'r I 1-- 2 ?fir,~1 ' . 4 4 â€¢, - I #*4/1 . 1 A Â·- - -Â· t ' ff â€¢ 4 Hpi44Â·:Â· Â».CLIC.L.4.L,ti>Â·Â·rpâ€¢ .1:A--%2.6,E.Cb-4/299: 1 1& 111,1, -f ' 1 IN./ P - . Er.â€¢, 4 . 12.9:Ill,11,8, 1 A 1,1111,1,1.1 I . . 4:40 492.14.* -6.* I * I I i t ..4 .'. ... .4.. 1 6 1,6 - .. I. 6. I ... .. . in ./ h.4,,1 - ~.* 14' -3. t> 1 , 1 ./ 11 â€¢ 4 1 1 Â£ 83: . 4 8,1011@- 1 I . 1,Â« + '712 ... 4 , -n' 1 1:1,1,1 Â· 1 6 7 1. . $ â€¢U , i ' lit ' I Jr . 1 44. . 1, 11 . 1 : 1 , -1 1 * ,)'"'~0 '1.!AÂ·Â· . .*.*_, ~h# 0 ; 1 .4, 5 - -,1 .. 1,13ful,1 11111'r~~ : ,/ ... >ic~ 4 1 .11 04. 11 11 4 1 0. 11, 1 :89 - - '6 ..r a J - 1 41 144l 1 1 .4 4,11 1 .. 1 1 1 1 1,~1121. 11. 1 1,1, Uent..9-Ilt:. .Â¥ 41 i Â· MTJ -1.J 11Â£4.Â£;22742,4,2 , New A. MEMORANDUM TO: Aspen Historic Preservation Commission FROM: Amy Simon, Historic Preservation Officer RE: 101 E. Hallam- Minor Development and Temporary On-site Relocation, Public Hearing DATE: September 24, 2014 SUMMARY: 101 E. Hallam is listed on the Aspen Inventory of Historic Landmark Sites and Structures. The site contains a Victorian era house and shed. Both buildings are constructed of th brick, which is a small subset of the 19 century residential structures remaining in Aspen. The applicant is requesting Minor Development review to expand an existing non-historic addition to the house and to excavate a new basement. Setback variances are requested to legalize existing and proposed new conditions. The amount of new square footage involved in the project qualifies this as Minor Development, The Victorian house will not be lifted to construct the new basement; rather it will be left in place and underpinned. Nonetheless, this work is reviewed as Temporary Relocation. Staff recommends the project be continued for restudy, finding that the proposal does not meet the design guidelines and decision-making criteria. As will be explained below, the house has been significantly altered in the past. The proposed new work further erodes the integrity of the historic resource. APPLICANT: Hallam LLC, represented by Forum Phi Architecture, with consent of the current property owner, Patricia Gorman. PARCEL ID: 2735-124-37-001. ADDRESS: 101 E. Hallam, Lot A and the west 4.86' of Lot B, Block 65, City and Townsite of Aspen, Colorado. ZONING: R-6 MINOR DEVELOPMENT The procedure for a Minor Development Review is as follows. Staff reviews the submittal materials and prepares a report that analyzes the project's conformance with the design guidelines and other applicable Land Use Code Sections. This report is transmitted to the HPC with relevant information on the proposed project and a recommendation to continue, approve, disapprove or approve with conditions and the reasons for the recommendation. The HPC will review the application, the staff analysis report and the evidence presented at the hearing to determine the project's conformance with the City of Aspen Historic Preservation 1 Design Guidelines. The HPC may approve, disapprove, approve with conditions, or continue the application to obtain additional information necessary to make a decision to approve or deny. U the application is approved, the HPC shall issue a Certificate of Appropriateness and the Community Development Director shall issue a Development Order. The HPC decision shall be jinal unless appealed by the applicant or a landowner within three hundred (300) feet of the subject property in accordance with the procedures set forth in Chapter 26.316. Staff Response: In 1982, the original hipped roo f on the subject house was demolished and replaced with a new gable roof with multiple dormers. The original front porch was also demolished and replaced in a different configuration. The work was not under HPC's authority at the time. The photos below compare the west side of 101 E. Hallam in 1980 (left photo) to a more recent photo of the west side of the house (right photo). 1 85Â¥-52*J;i ~3*i@ -2-2 f:1 r. - . - 3 Alk Â· 43 -- . 44,2, ' I 44 7ht1: .- Mt 4, CA -W* li- A , . 4 37>:1 . fi . f . 101 E. Hallam and 105 E. Hallam, the site directly to the east, were built by the Brown/Cowenhoven family, in 1885. The houses were mirror images of each other and a brick shed along the alley spans across the property line between the two neighbors. The photos below compare the historic front of 105 E. Hallam to the current front o f 101 E. Hallam. r .''Ti ' + rn - 4 7 ... L / t.:91, . ..0- 41.9 - 0 Â¥ 4 11 4 r ,â€žfit> 3 - ~922,4-4~2- ,/110 .f .M>:'i . 'Al; r; f ' ,-03 79 1 -'*1 Â·qi f Yf I .-3,141Â©'d 5% I - ''114,144 I 'r 'MU ...-Â«fiff ./ I.Il--7/-7 - !44 Â·! 1'4Â·rÂ·f 4/1 eadv~ '.1 1 j/5,/11'f] L 6 - 1 ~.~132 . --bili~WEi "$9 -Ir." The application before HPC proposes no exterior changes (no alterations, but also no restoration work) to the Victorian structure. A basement is proposed to be built below the house. The application focuses on modifying and expanding an addition at the rear of the building, reconfiguring living space and adding a one car garage. There is currently no parking area provided on this site. Parking has been occurring, without City approvals, in a. fenced in parking area on the public right o f way to the west of the property. The total increase in floor area created by this project is 250 square foot. The gross increase is greater than that because the new basement and new garage make the home larger, but are mostly exempted from floor area calculations. Before the HPC application was submitted, staff encouraged the potential new buyer of this site to restore the original roof form, which is an action that would likely earn the 500 square foot floor area bonus. That is exactly the sort of purpose for which HPC has authority to allow this incentive. Restoration of the roof is a significant cost undertaking and would displace some of the living area that exists in the gable on the home today. The applicant chose not to request the bonus and not to disturb the historic area of the home. The north and south limits of the historic structure lie between the gridlines labeled "D" and "F" on the applicant's plans and elevations. South of gridline "D," (towards the alley) the applicant proposes to retain some of the existing non-historic addition, but add a garage on the ground floor, lengthen and widen the upper fioor living space, and change the roofline to a more modern form. Staff finds that the work does not meet the design guidelines, particularly the following: 10.3 Design a new addition such that one's ability to interpret the historic character of the primary building is maintained. A new addition that creates an appearance inconsistent with the historic character of the primary building is inappropriate. An addition that seeks to imply an earlier period than that of the primary building also is inappropriate. An addition that seeks to imply an inaccurate variation of the primary building's historic style should be avoided. o An addition that covers historically significant features is inappropriate. 10.4 Design a new addition to be recognized as a product of its own time. u An addition should be made distinguishable from the historic building, while also remaining visually compatible with these earlier features. u A change in setbacks of the addition from the historic building, a subtle change in material or a differentiation between historic, and more current styles are all techniques that may be considered to help define a change from old to new construction. 10.9 Roof forms should be similar to those of the historic building. Typically, gable, hip and shed roofs are appropriate. Flat roofs are generally inappropriate for additions on residential structures with sloped roofs. 10.11 On a new addition, use exterior materials that are compatible with the historic materials of the primary building. o The new materials should be either similar or subordinate to the original materials. 3 0 0 00 0 Even if the original roof form cannot be restored, this remodel is an opportunity to more clearly define the original house. The proposed roof on the new master bedroom is foreign to the historic structure and draws too much attention to the new construction. A modern addition has been allowed in many preservation projects, but a corner site is much more sensitive given the exposure to view on three sides. SETBACK VARIANCES The applicant requests setback variances on the east, west, rear and combined yards for existing and new construction, and a reduction of the required distance between the house and existing shed. In granting a variance, the HPC must make a finding that such a variance: a. Is similar to the pattern, features and character ofthe historic property or district; and/or b. Enhances or mitigates an adverse impact to the historic significance or architectural character of the historic property, an adjoining designated historic property or historic district. Staff Response: The historic house encroaches by about 6" into the west sideyard setback, and the existing rear addition encroaches about 6" into the east sideyard. The applicant proposes to maintain those conditions and to dig a basement that enjoys setback encroachments, albeit below grade. New lightwells proposed in the east sideyard appear to be larger than the minimum required by Building Code, and would therefore need a variance. Staff recommends that the basement excavation under the historic house be required to follow the footprint of the existing foundation and not create new expansions into the setback. Staff recommends all new construction, and the new lightwells, meet the setback requirements. The applicant requests a reduction in the 5' separation required between the new garage and the historic shed. Approximately 4' is provided. The applicant is asked to clarify why the size of the garage cannot be reduced, or the garage shifted to the west setback line to meet the required separation. Staff is unable to make a finding that allowing the garage to be too close to the historic shed is mitigating an adverse impact on that structure. The current property owner, and/or previous property owners, have made a number of improvements in the public right of way, including fences, a storage structure, parking, a gazebo, and a stone patio. The Engineering Department reviewed the property and determined in July that they will not approve encroachment licenses for any of these features and all will need to be removed, either as part of a building permit related to this project, or at another date to be determined by the Engineering Department. The Department feels that this determination is consistent with how they have handled other similar requests related to right of way encroachments that do not need to be retained due to having some historic significance. 4 RELOCATION The intent of this Chapter is to preserve designated historic properties in their original locations as much of their significance is embodied in their setting and physical relationship to their surroundings as well as their association with events and people with ties to particular site. However, it is recognized that occasionally the relocation of a property may be appropriate as it provides an alternative to demolition or because it only has a limited impact on the attributes that make it signijicant. The following standards apply for relocating a historic property as per Section 26.415.090.C of the Municipal Code: C. Standards for the Relocation of Designated Properties Relocation for a building, structure or object will be approved if it is determined that it meets any one of the following standards: 1. It is considered a non-contributing element of a historic district and its relocation will not affect the character of the historic district; 21: 2. It does not contribute to the overall character of the historic district or parcel on which it is located and its relocation will not have an adverse impact on the historic district or property; or 3. The owner has obtained a Certificate of Economic Hardship; 21: 4. The relocation activity is demonstrated to be an acceptable preservation method given the character and integrity of the building, structure or object and its move will not adversely affect the integrity of the historic district in which it was originally located or diminish the historic, architectural or aesthetic relationships of adjacent designated properties; and Additionally, for approval to relocate all of the following criteria must be met: 1. It has been determined that the building, structure or object is capable of withstanding the physical impacts of relocation; and 2. An appropriate receiving site has been identified; and 3. An acceptable plan has been submitted providing for the safe relocation, repair and preservation of the building, structure or object including the provision of the necessary financial security. Staff Response: The existing house will remain where it is during this project. The historic house will gradually be underpinned with a new foundation and the full basement excavation will be completed. Although the house will not be lifted and moved during excavation, the standard assurances that the structure will be protected are required. A memo from a structural engineer addressing the preservation concerns must be submitted with the building permit. 5 DECISION MAKING OPTIONS: The HPC may: â€¢ approve the application, â€¢ approve the application with conditions, â€¢ disapprove the application, or â€¢ continue the application to a date certain to obtain additional information necessary to make a decision to approve or deny. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that Minor Development approval be continued for restudy. Exhibit: Resolution # , Series of 2014 A. Design Guidelines B. Application "Exhibit A, Relevant Design Guidelines, 101 E. Hallam" 8.1 If an existing secondary structure is historically significant, then it must be preserved. u When treating a historic secondary building, respect its character-defining features. These include its primary and roofmaterials, roof form, windows, doors and architectural details. u If a secondary structure is not historically significant, then its preservation is optional. 8.3 Avoid attaching a garage or carport to the primary structure. u Traditionally, a garage was sited as a separate structure at the rear of the lot; this pattern should be maintained. Any proposal to attach an accessory structure is reviewed on a case- by-case basis. 4 A garage door should be compatible with the character of the historic structure. A wood-clad hinged door is preferred on a historic structure. If an overhead door is used, the materials should match that o f the secondary structure. If the existing doors are hinged, they can be adapted with an automatic opener. 10.3 Design a new addition such that one's ability to interpret the historic character of the primary building is maintained. 0 A new addition that creates an appearance inconsistent with the historic character of the primary building is inappropriate. o An addition that seeks to imply an earlier period than that of the primary building also is inappropriate. 6 0 0 0 9Â© o An addition that seeks to imply an inaccurate variation of the primary building's historic style should be avoided. 3 An addition that covers historically significant features is inappropriate. 10.4 Design a new addition to be recognized as a product of its own time. u An addition should be made distinguishable from the historic building, while also remaining visually compatible with these earlier features. o A change in setbacks o f the addition from the historic building, a subtle change in material or a differentiation between historic, and more current styles are all techniques that may be considered to help define a change from old to new construction. 10.6 Design an addition to be compatible in size and scale with the main building. u An addition that is lower than or similar to the height of the primary building is preferred. 10.8 Place an addition at the rear of a building or set it back from the front to minimize the visual impact on the historic structure and to allow the original proportions and character to remain prominent. u Locating an addition at the front of a structure is inappropriate. u Additional floor area may also be located under the building in a basement which will not alter the exterior mass of a building. o Set back an addition from primary facades in order to allow the original proportions and character to remain prominent. A minimum setback of 10 feet on primary structures is recommended. 10.9 Roof forms should be similar to those of the historic building. Typically, gable, hip and shed roofs are appropriate. Flat roofs are generally inappropriate for additions on residential structures with sloped roofs. 10.11 On a new addition, use exterior materials that are compatible with the historic materials of the primary building. u The new materials should be either similar or subordinate to the original materials. 7 CO ATTACHMENT 2 -Historic Preservation Land Use Application PROJECT: 101 E Hallam Name: Location: 101 E Hallam Street, Aspen, CO 81611 CITY AND TOWNSITE OF ASPEN Block: 65 Lot: A&W 4.86' OF LOT B (Indicate street address. lot & block number or metes and bounds description of property ) Parcel ID # (REQUIRED) 273512437001 APPLICANT: Name: Hallam LLC Address: 715 W Ma n Street, Ste 204, Aspen CO 81611 Phone #: 970-279-4109 Fax#: E-mail: swilson@forumphi.corn REPRESENTATIVE: Name: Steev Wilson Address: 715 W Main Street, Ste 204, Aspen CO 81611 Phone #: 970-279-4109 Fax#: E-mail: swilson@forumphi.com TÂ¥'PE OF App[,ICATION: (please check all that apply): U Historic Designation E Relocation (temporary, on U Certificate of No Negative Effect U or off-site) U Certificate of Appropriateness El Demolition (total demolition) -Minor Historic Development gl Historic Landmark Lot Split -Major Historic Development -Conceptual Historic Development -Final Historic Development -Substantial Amendment EXISTING COND'rrIONS: (description of existing buildings. uses. previous approvals. etc.) Single family historic structure originally constructed in 1888 with previous non-historic upper level and roof addition. PROPOSAL: (description ofproposed buildings, uses, modifications. etc.) Proposed addition with subordinate linking element and new basement under both historic and proposed. The existing historic structure will be lett in place and underpinned Aspen Historic Preservation Land Use Application Requirements, Updated: May 29,2007 U 23 El El ATTACHMENT 3 - Dimensional Requirements Form (item #10 on the submittal requirements key. Not necessary for all projects.) Project: 101 E Hallam Street Applicant: Steev Wilson on behalf of Hallam LLC Project Location: 101 E Hallam Street, Aspen CO, 81611 Zone District: R-6 Lot Size: 3,486 SQ FT Lot Area: 3,486 SQ FT (For the purposes of calculating Floor Area. Lot Area may be reduced for areas within the hig]1 water mark. easements, and steep slopes. Please refer to the definition of Lot Area in the Municipal Code.) Commercial net leasable: Existing. 0 Proposed: 0 Number of residential units: Existing. 1 Proposed: Number ofbedrooms: Existing. 2 Proposed: 4 Proposed Â°/0 of deinolition DIMENSIONS: (write n/a where no requirement exists in the zone district) Floor Area: Existing.Â· 2,256.5 Allowable: 2,536.08 Proposed: 2,504.02 Height Principal Bldg.: Existing. 23'8" Allowable: 25 Proposed: 238' Accessory Bldg.. Existing: 12'6" Allowable: Proposed: 12'6" On-Site parking: Existing: 1 Required: 2 Proposed: 1 % Site coverage: Existing.~ n/a Required: n/a Proposed: nla % Open Space: Existing: n/a Required: n/a Proposed: n/a Front Setback: Existing: 10 Required: 10 Proposed: 10 Rear Setback: Existing: 10' Required: 10 Proposed: 10 Combined Front/Rear: Indicate N. S. E. W Existing.' 20' Required: 20 Prom,sed: 20 Side Setback: W Existing.Â· 5' Required: 5 Proposed: 4.5' Side Setback: E Existing: 4'8" Required: 9 Proposed: 48' Combined Sides: Existing. 101 Required: 10 Proposed: 9.9 Distance between Exis/ing. 117" Required: 9 Proposed: 3'10' buildings: Existing non-conformities or encroachments and note ifencroachment licenses liave been issued: Variations requested (identify the exact variances needed): Aspen Historic Preservation Land Use Application Requirements. Updated: May 29,2007 .. - Â¢"t.:~..:L.05Â·..A* A- 4 11 1/ TO: Chris Bendon, Community Development Director FROM: Forum Phi RE: 101 E Hallam Street DATE: June 30, 2014 Dear Director, Forum Phi requests your approval of an HPC Land Use Application based on the "temporary relocation' standards for a historic structure located at 101 E Hallam Street. The subject property is listed on the Aspen Inventory of Historic Landmark Sites and Structures. The single-family residence was previously remodeled with a non-historic addition in 1972. There will be a substantial subgrade/basement addition underneath the historic structure which will cause it to be temporarily shored in place. The existing non-historic main and upper level additions will be remodeled, in addition to a new garage located directly off the alley. The Land Use Application for Conceptual Review is complete per the City of Aspen Community Development Department's Historic Preservation Application Package. Sincerely, Steev Wilson, AIA City of Aspen Review Standards Compliance 26.410.040. Residential Design Standards A. Site Design. 1. Building orientation. The lot is a corner lot and the existing street-facing facades are parallel to the intersection streets (Hallam Street and Garmisch Street) 2. Build-to lines. The lot is a corner lot and more tlian 60% of the facade is within five feet of the minimum setback. 3. Fences The existing three-foot fence akjng the properly line is less than 42 inches ariel will remain. B. Building form. 1. Secondary mass. The lot contains an existing historic structure to rernain that predates the residential design standards. C. Parking, garages and carports. 1. For all residential uses that have access from an alley or private road, the [listed] standards shall apply. The proposed garage door is a single stall door and is visible from the alley. 2. For all residential uses that have access only from a public street, the Disted] standards shall apply: The garage door is a single stall door and is accessed from an alley; therefore this section does not apply. D. Building elements. 1. Street oriented entrance and principal window. The existing historic house has a street-onented entrance and a street-facing principal window to remain. a) The existing entry door to remain is no more than ten (10) feet back from the front- most wall of the building and is not taller than eight (8) feet. b} The existing front porch is greater than 50 square feet with a minimum depth of six feet. The entry porch is one story in height. c) The existing street-facing facades contain significant groups of windows. 2. First story element. The lot contains an existing historic structure to remain that predates the residential design standards , 3. Windows. a) The existing and proposed street-facing windows do not span between nine and twelve feet above the finished floor. b) The existing historic structure contains one non-ortliogonal window to remain on the front facade. All proposed windows are orthogonal. 4. Lightwells. The proposed lightwells are recessed behind the front-most wall of the building and are !101 located on the street-facing facade E. Context. 1. Materials. a) The quality of the exterior materials and their application is consistent on all sides of the building b) The use of materials are true to their characteristics. Proposed materials will be approved at the HPC Final Review. c) There are no proposed highly reflective materials. Proposed materials will be approved at the HPC Final Review. 2. Inflection. al This parcel is less than six thousand (6,000) square feet therefore this section does not apply. City of Aspen Historic Preservation Design Guidelines Introduction The property at 101 E Hallam Street is listed in the Aspen Inventory of Historic Landmark Sites and Structures. As required for submittal this letter of compliance is for HPC Conceptual Review. Streetscape and Lot Features This project is located on Lot A, on the corner of Hallam Street and Garmisch Street. The lot encroaches 4.86 feet to the west into Lot B. The property received a variance in 1998 for "a four foot rear yard and a five foot side yard setback variance" The property has a grass planting strip from a fence at the property line to the street. A single brick sidewalk extends from Hallam Street to the front porch and jogs ninety-degrees to align with the front door. Two large conifer trees are located on either side of this walk. There is no public sidewalk to separate the planting strip from the property line, Another private walk extends from Garmisch Street to the west side of the house. A row of four Aspen trees line the fence along the property line on the Garmisch Street side. All existing trees on site will remain and any affected plantings will be reestablished. A three-foot wrought-iron fence borders the property line along both the Hallam and Garmisch Street sides. The west and rear (southwest) portion of the lot has an existing six-foot non-historic wood fence surrounding a pergola and patio area. This pergola area will be removed. The site does not have any historic retainjng walls, and no new retaining walls are proposed at this time. There are ceiling-mounted sconces located under both the historic front porch and the side porch. A street lamp post is located at the corner of the Hallam and Garmisch Streets. All other proposed site lighting will be shielded. All streetscape features will be returned to existing conditions. Historic Building Materials The primary historic building material is brick, with a non-historic upper level addition of shingle siding. The brick has been well-maintained and any areas requiring repair will be done in place. A portion of the non-historic addition will be remodeled with new materials, primarily horizontal stained cedar siding. The existing roof was remodeled as part of a non-historic addition in 1972. The proposed roof will be standing seam metal, to be distinguishable from the 1972 shake shingle roof. Any demolition to occur will be primarily interior and to non-historic portions of the exterlor. Windows All historic windows on the existing structure are located on the lower level; the 1972 upper level addition js not historic. All historic windows maintain the original character, although it appears several have been previously replaced. The existing historic windows will remain unchanged and will receive proper maintenance where required. These windows are double hung type with brick arch tops and brick sills. All historic windows will receive repairs where required, with no changes to character-defining features. Replacement windows are not anticipated for the historic portions of the project. If required, any replacements will preserve the historjc character of openings, design, materials, size and proportion, and profjle. Storm windows may be installed to enhance energy performance of the historic structure, but have not been proposed at this early phase in design. Doors The historic structure has two remaining historic glass paneled doors. The first is the primary entry facing Hallam Street, the second entry on the west facade facing Garmisch Street. These doors will be maintained in order to preserve integrity, function, size, appearance, design and color. The historic doors will not be replaced and storm doors are not proposed at this time. A third historic entry is located on the east facade, but the historic door is no longer intact. This opening leads to a crawlspace access area. Porches The primary porch on the front facade has been previously removed and replaced, and will be maintained in its existing condition. A second covered entry on the west facade is not historic but will be maintained in its existing condition. A previous remodel included the addition of a pergola structure and at-grade patio on the southwest portion of the property. The pergola and patio area is surrounded by a six-foot non- historic wood fence. This pergola area will be removed. Architectural Details Distinct architectural details exist on the historic structure, specifically the porch columns and brick arches over historic windows and doors. These details represent those typical of the late 1800s and will be maintained and repaired only where required. Any repairs and/or replacements to historic features will be documented prior to submission of a building permit and construction. Roofs The existing roof structure was previously replaced and is not historic. It appears no portion of the original historic roof remains intact. Secondary Structures The property contains a secondary common building which abuts the alleyway and is shared between both properties at 101 Hallam and 105 Hallam. This structure appears to be historic, as it is shown on a Sanborn Insurance Map of Aspen from 1890. The structure is a one-story brick building that has been covered by clapboard siding on the north and west facades,and covered by concrete in other areas. The shake shingle roof has been previously replaced and will be maintained where required. The structure will remain and be remodeled on the interior for a proposed use. Building Relocation & Foundations The proposed design includes the addition of a basement/lower level directly underneath the existing structure. The location of the original structure will remain and will be shored jn place while a basement with new foundation walls are constructed below. The new foundation will be similar in design and materials to the historic foundation. Two proposed lightwells will be added to the east side of the building, recessed behind the front facade. Building Additions In the early 1980s, a second-level addition was constructed on the historic structure. During this addition, the historic roof was demolished and reconstructed. A portion of the previous addition . will be demolished and remodeled. The proposed addition has been designed such that the character of the historic structure is maintained, with a linking element that is recessed behind the west elevation. The proposed addition is designed to be recognized as a product of its own time. The style of the proposed addition is modern and will be located at the rear of the historic structure, with minimal visibility from the street-facing facade. It is distinguishable from the historic structure with horizontal siding and a metal roof. The roof of the proposed addition is designed at a slightly lower elevation than the historic structure and will not interfere with the existing roof. All portions of the addition will be located behind the primary street-facing setback. Most of the new floor area will be located subgrade. The proposed floor area is approximately 2,498 square feet. This is below the maximum allowable FAR for the parcel (2,536 square feet). This project is not within the Main Street Historic District nor the Commercial Core Historic District, and does not involve a new primary structure on a historic parcel. General Guidelines The historic structure is constructed of brick with painted dark brown and dark tan accents of the porch and non-historic second story addition. The original accent colors will be researched and all attempts will be made to return the historic portion to its original. Any new color schemes chosen for the historic stru ctu re w 11 be simple, coordinated, and consistent with the character of a Victorian built in the late 1800s. The proposed addition will also be coordinated with the historic scheme, while remaining distinguishable in color and material. Exterior lighting has not been completely developed at the conceptual level, but will be simple in form and detail. Existing lights on the historic structure will remain. Any proposed site lighting will be shielded and/or low intensity. Visual impacts from interior lighting will be subdued. The surface of the historic structure will be maintained, repaired, and cleaned where necessary. The methods used will be low impact and follow the recommendations of the preservation design guidelines. Any repainting methods will be planned carefully. Mechanical and service areas will be located within the proposed addition. All service areas will be visually blocked from the primary street facade. All facades of the historic structure will remain free of mechanical and service equipment. The proposed garage will be accessed from the existing alleyway via a paved driveway. A small parking area will be located on the driveway. The driveway will be screened by landscaping from the primary building facade. The project is a single-family residence and will not utilize any signage. 111 WEST FRANCIS LLC 120 EAST MAIN PARTNERS LLC BRADY WILLIAM JB 111 28 ROCK RIDGE AVE 120 E MAIN ST 14671 FIELDSTONE DR GREENWICH, CT 06831 ASPEN, CO 81611 SARATOGA, CA 95070 BROCKWAY LEXIE CITY OF ASPEN COLLINS CINDA REV TRUST 7714 FISHER ISLAND DR 130 S GALENA ST 42 PARK LN FISHER ISLAND, FL 33109-0966 ASPEN, CO 81611 MINNEAPOLIS, MN 55416 CRAWFORD RANDALL & ABIGAIL DOMINGUE FAMILY TRUST DTJ LEGACY PROPERTIES LLC 124 N GARMISCH ST PO BOX 2293 202 W 19TH ST ASPEN, CO 81611 WINTER PARK, FL 32790 EL DORADO, AR 71730 ERWIN GREGORY D GARCIA STEVEN J GARMISCH LODGING LLC PO BOX 4470 120 N GARMISCH 110 W MAIN ST BASALT, CO 81621 ASPEN, CO 81611 ASPEN, CO 81611 GSW FAMILY INV LP HENRY FREDERICK B TRUST HOGUET CONSTANCE M 1320 HUNSICKER RD 100 W HALLAM ST 333 E 68TH ST LANCASTER, PA 17601 ASPEN, CO 81611 NEW YORK, NY 10065 JAMMB LLC JOHNSON RICHARD & MONTAE IMBT KRUMM DONALD PAUL REV TRUST 500 S DIXIE HWY STE 201 6820 BRADBURY PO BOX 874 CORAL GABLES, FL 33146 DALLAS, TX 75230 ASPEN, CO 81612 LANDIS CAROLYN MOUNTAIN STATE PROPERTIES LLC PARDUBA JIRI 128 N GARMISCH ST 715 10TH ST SOUTH 116 N GARMISCH ST ASPEN, CO 81611 NAPLES, FL 34102 ASPEN, CO 81612 PENN PAUL E & SUSAN W RODNEY JOHN W ROSE BRANDON 3830 E 79TH ST 8536 N GOLF DR 625 MT HOPE RD INDIANAPOLIS, IN 46260-3457 PARADISE VALLEY, AZ 85253 WHARTON, NJ 07885 SARDY HOUSE NEW LLC SPEARS NANCY M WOLKENMUTH EDWARD F JR & STEELE 240 CRANDON BLVD #167 PO BOX 2630 JULIANNE BELL REV TRUST KEY BISCAYNE, FL 33149 ASPEN, CO 81612 121 W BLEEKER ST ASPEN, CO 81611 ZATS JULIE 118 N GARMISCH ASPEN, CO 81611 I - .. . . I. - : . I 11 .. . .' :// 1 : . 10. . . 0 ./. I 1 .... . .. 0 . . ..- .....:. 1 1 . 0 . ... ... I , 411#.- -. 67 22 ~4 4â‚¬ 7/' f/4 0, 11 ./ . '41 1 4: . /0 410 ' ...9,- & 1. h . 9 11* . 0 - 64 1 , 4.- --eÂ».. 3 <0 L# dll @, 1 , .4 '4 f 44*11*JSZ.... a. 1 . 140 4/004 L A, H. 12#42., b. A. 1 39~0. . 361 + .4 1 .2- < - ; /,avilb'9~Â«1121 ~- 1- 1*4 ' h- 1:' et.â€ž h e- '16 1111 11<t ... ~6 : ::~10.1, , ~~~ ~ ,.a~ja- -1~ 1 c Itt k 4.Itae. 1 \11,49'e a#St4 B. 0- * 1 k -111'k'Ble'lÂ¥* .FA 5 ~.4,Â£. tal.-2- a- 6~.~- 1 FID, - I. . F Ablf.01,~le,-L --- ,/1 Aliziluelit~& 'ti:ill'Emple,Witi;,2995Ilillilijilizill/0111,& 2, . 9 '7 bAIi-=-1~*/ *I --Ll#,AF,1,41A -----""- - 22_44+iÂ®Al'F m. ., , , 1. . - -. 6,1 45/*I:, 4 04 1, " 4 t1 P 4 tail.,1 1 0 1. 111/ Li j |4'1 1'11 : ~1 1111 L ''Ti j --/1 lilli lili;Â· 1'. 1 ! 1 1 ... '1 1 . .,1 - 111111 lili '~ ~ I'lili Il,1,1,1 1;21Â· 41'.. .. ' 'Illk Iiâ€žii:i.,illi.It': ~'~AÂ·'F.-,41*, Â·. ,- -~'~i NA,1~iâ€¢8~i~-j~ti~~11411~l~'111"~'lit#+1#11'~0#Fr?'~l=jL-- 1 - 4 111!1111.11 @1-12!~ . 11.1., ..,.. . :. 0. 0 .... .... I - - I .-. .... .... 1 A A .. A .- .. . A - 0 - FORUM PHI 715 West Main Street. Suite 204 Aspen, Colorado 81611 P 970279 4157 F 866 770 5585 101 E HALLAM HALLAM LLC 101 E Hallam St Aspen, Colorado 81611 CONSULTANTS SURVEYOR Aspen Survey Engineers, Inc 210 S Galena Street Aspen. Colorado 81611 (970) 925-3816 aspensurveyors@gmail com CIVIL TBD MECHANICAL TBD SectiQn_,1. Conditions upon Which Variance is Granted. RESOLUTION NO.Q, Series of 1998 3. The grant of variance will be generally consistent with A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT OF THE CITY OF ASPEN the purposes, goals, objectives, and policies of the The variance granted by Section 2, above, is specifically GRANTING A VARIANCE WITH CONDITIONS IN CASE NUMBER 98-3 Aspen Area Comprehensive Plan and Chapter 24 of the conditioned upon and subject to the following conditions: RELATING TO PROPERTIES IN THE CITY OF ASPEN WITH STREET ADDRESSES Aspen Municipal Code. STRUCTURAL 1. No balcony or similar improvement shall be permitted TBD OF 101 EAST HALLAM STREET AND 105 EAST HALLAM STREET, ASPEN, COLORADO AND LEGAL DESCRIPTIONS OF LOT A AND THE WESTERLY 4. The grant of variance is the minimum variance that within the east aide yard setback. 4.96 FEET OF LOT B, BLOCK 65; AND THE EAST 25.14 FEET OF LOT B AND will make poesible the reasonable uae of the parcel. Section 24-6-207 of the Aspen Municipal Code, the variance granted THE WEST 8 FEET OF LOT C. BLOCK 65. CITY AND TOWNSITE OF ASPEN. building or structure. 2. Unless vested as part of a development plan pursuant to WHEREAS, Mr. Donald Kru=n and Mr. Alan Buah have made 5. The literal interpretation and enforcement of the herein ehall automatically expire after twelve (12) months from CONTRACTOR termz of Chapter 24 of the Aspen Municipal Code the date of approval unlege development has been commenced as TBD application. dated April 1, 1998 to the Board of Adjustment for a would deprive the applicant of rights commonly enjoyed evidenced by the issuance of a building permit, or an extension by other parcele in the game zone district, and would granted by the Board in which case the variance shall expire at variance from the dimensional requirements of Chapter 24 of the cause the applicant unneceseary hardship or practical the end of the extenmionÂ· difficulty. In determining that the applicant'a rights Aspen Municipal Code; and would be deprived abment a variance, the Board 3. Applicant shall, prior to filing an application for a building permit, cause to be recorded with the Clerk and 7 2 2014 DATE OF PUBLICATION considered certain special conditions and circum WHEREAS. this matter came on for hearing before thi Board of stances which are unique to the parcel, building or Recorder' e Office of Pitkin County a copy of this resolution. structure, which are not applicable to other parcel/, Adjustment on April 30, 1998 and after full deliberations and structuree or buildinge in the same zone district and INTRODUCED, READ AND ADOPTED by the Board of Adjustment which do not result from the actions of the applicant; of the City of Aipan on th, 7th day cy May. 1998 consideration of the evidence and testimony presented. to wit: NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT OF The existing non-conforming location of the historic Chai~perion shed, which epans both properties, combined with the non- THE CITY OF ASPEN, COLORADO: conforming lot width of the properties, significantly I, the undersigned duly appointed and acting Deputy constrains the area available for development. City Clerk do certify that the foregoing is a true and accurate - copy of that resolution adopted by the Board of Adjustment of the aial_2. Vatiance Granted. SO 6/30/14 HPC CONCEPT. REV Sectien~_1. Findings of Fact. City of Aspen, Colorado, at a meeting hald on the day hereinabove stated. The Board of Adjuetment make, the following findings of The Board of Adjustment does hereby grant the applicant the ~:~-13,50.02â€¢â„¢L~)-~~----~-'t PROJECT NO: 1411 fact: of 24 of the Aupen deputy City Clerk ' following variance from the termâ€¢ chapter rÂ»9'ozm,20~ 'L-- DRAWN BY: KPT Approved as to content: 1. A development application for a variance was initiated Municipal Code: by: Mr.Donald Krumm and Mr. Alan Bush for properties with striet addressee of 101 East Hallam Street and 105 East A four foot rear yard and a five foot side yard setback COPYRIGHT FORUM PHI. LLC Hallam Street, Aspen, Colorado. variance at both 101 EaBt Hallam and 105 East Hallam to allow for the expaniion of an existing shed by 4 1/2 feet to the west of the 2. Notice of the proposed variance has been provided to existing west wall of said shed. Assistant City Attorney surrounding property ownete in accordance with Section 24-6 205 (E) (4)b) of the Aspen Municipal Code. Evidence of such notice is on file with the City Clerk. l j. 1 2 1 ~1~111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111 Ir i 6, 1./2/ UMBLIEV"Mult"%'a'Ru'l!~11~1'11' 1 1111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111 2 of 3 R 18.00 0 0.00 N 0.00 PITKIN COUITY CO 3 of 3 R 16.00 D 0.00 N 0.00 PITKIN COUNTY 40 424379 11,11/1998 09:20Q RESOLUTI DAVIS SILVI - SHEET TITLE 424370 11/11/1098 09:26A RESOLUTI DAVIS SILVI 1 of 3 R 18.00 0 0.00 N 0.00 Pin<IN COUNTY CO LAND USE Resolution No 2 of 1998 Resolution No 2 of 1998 Resolution No. 2 of 1998 APPROVALS ORDINANCE NO. 16 (SERIES OF 2001) C. Designer. The stnucture is a significant wod of an architect or designer whuse individuat work has influenced the character of Aspen, AN ORDINANCE OF THE ASPEN CITY COUNCIL GRANTING APPROVAL Section 2: Pursuant to the findings set forth in Section 1, above, the City Council does FOR LANDMARK DESIGNATION OF 101 E. HALLAM STREET, LOT A AND D. Neighborhood Chai#cfer. The structure or site is a significant component of hereby designate as an Historic Landmark 101 F Hallam Street, Lot A and the west 4.86 l'HE WEST 4.86 FEET OF LOT B, BLOCK 65, CITY AND TOWNSITE OF an historcally significant neighborhood and the preservation of the structure or feet of Lot B. Block 65, City and Townsite of Aspen. without conditions. FORUM PHI ASPEN M . important for the maintenance of that neighborhood character Section 3: If any section, subsection, sentence, clause. phrase or portion of this Parcel Identification No. 2735-124-37-001 F. Communi) Characier. The structure or .te is critical to the preservation of ordinance is for any reason held invalid or unconstitutional by any court of competent the character of the Aspen community because o f its relationship in terms of Si74 jurisdiction. such provision and such holding shall not affect the validity of the remaining location and archilectura] similarity to other structures or sites of historical or portions thereof. WHEREAS, the applicants. Jim and Paincia Gorman, represented by Mary A. Avjian architectural importance: and Architects. have requested landmark designation for the property at 101 E. Hallam Street. Section 4: 1-his Ordinance shall not affect any existing litigation and shall not operate as Lot A and the west 4.86 feet of Lot B. Block 65. City and Townsite of Aspen. and WHEREAS, the Aspen City Council has reviewed and considered the Landmark an abatement of any action or proceeding now pending under or by virtue of the 715 West Main Street. Suite 204 Designation, has reviewed and considered those recommendations made by the ordinances repealed or amended as herein provided. and the same shall bâ‚¬ conducted and Aspen. Colorado 81611 P 970.279 4157 F 866 770 5585 WHEREAS, pursuant to Section 26.420.020. requests for landmark designation shall be Community Development 1)epartment. the Historic Preservation Commission. and the concluded under such prior ordinances. reviewed and recommended for approval, approval with conditions. or disapproval bv the Planning and Zoning Commission. and has taken and considered public comment at a Community Development Director. hy the HI>C, and by the Planning and Zoning public hearingÂ· and &*EliME-11 A public hearing on the Ordinance was held on the 14th day of May. 2001 at Commission at a public hearing, and then approved. approved with conditions, or 5:00 P.M. in the City Council Chambers. Aspen City Hall, Aspen Colorado, fifteen (15) disapproved ata public hearing by the Cit> Council. and WHEREAS, the City Council finds that the Landmark Designation meets or exceeds all days prior to which hearing a public notice of the same was published once in a applicable development standards of the above referenced Municipal Code sections: and newspaper of general circulation within Uke City of Aspen. 101 E HALLAM HALLAM LLC WHEREAS, the Community Development Director performed an analysis of the application ba,ed on the standards, found favorably for the application. and WIIEREAS, the applicant requests, and Council hereby approves a one-time $2.000 INTRODUCED, READ AND ORDERED PUBLISHED as pro,ided by law. by the 101 E Hallam St recommended approval of landmark designation. and landmark grant pursuant to Section 26.420.030. i f available in this fiscal year: and City Council of the City of Aspen on the 23rd day of April, 2001. Aspen, Colorado 81611 WHEREAS, the Aspen Instoric Preservatiun Conunission reviewed and recommended WHEREAS, the City Council finds that this Ordinance furthers and is necessary for the d-lÂ»q.gl~~ - approval of landmark designation by a vote of 5-1 on April 11,2001, and public health. safety and welfare. WHEREAS, the Aspen Planning and Zoning Commission reviewed and recommended NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE. ~ Rachel E. Richards, Elkyor approval of landmark designauon by a vote of 5 to 0 on April 17, 2001: and CITY oF ASPEN, COLORADO, THAT: Â©013'Nd: WHEREAS, all applications for Historic Landmark 1)esignation shall meet two or more Section I Pursuant to Section 26 420,020 of the Municipal Code. the City Council of the following Standards for Designation of Section 26 420.010 in order for Council to finds as follows in regard to the Historic I.andmark Designation and Grant Request~ ?~;~Z;~6-,~GL.,).p<~2~~~~~ grant approval. namely. 1 The applicants submission is complete and sufficient to afford review and L Kathryn SÂ£#och. City Clerk A, H:foricat /mponance: The structure or site is a principal or secondary evaluation for approval. and. r.'.' structure or site commonh identified or associated with a person or event of historical significance to the cultural, social, or political history of Aspen, the 2 The landmark designation is appropriate, finding that standards A (historical APPROVED AS TO I ORM: State of Colorado. or the I Jnited States. importance). B (architectural importance). D (neighbottlood character) and E (community character) of Section 26.420 010 are met: and CONSULTANTS B. Archiuciurat Imponance. rhe structure ar site reflects an archltectura] style .<~A 0 i ... - that is unique, distinct or of traditional Aspen character. or the xtructure or site 3. lee property is eligible for, and the applicant shall receive a $2.000 landmark ,-- SURVEYOR embodies the distinguishing characteristics of a significant or unique architectural designation grant. if funds are available in this fiscal year. i:162295:29 Atto.ney Aspen Survey Engineers, Inc type (based on building form or use), or specimen. 210 S Galena Street Aspen. Colorado 81611 (970) 925-3816 111111111111111111111111111111111 mill'11111'll lili'111 1111111 lilli 111111111111111111111111111111111111111 lili aspensurveyors@gmail com 455762 06/25/2001 11:21A ORDINANC DAVIS SILVI 455782 06/25/2001 11:2IA ORDINANC DAVIS SILVI 2 of 4 R 20.00 D 0.00 N 0.00 PITKIN COUNTY CO 111111111111111111 111111111111111 mii" In '1111 1111 lili 1 of 4 R 20.00 0 0.00 N 0.00 PITKIN COUNTY CO 455752 06/25,2001 11:21A ORDINANC DAVIS BILVI CIVIL 3 of 4 R 20.00 De.00 N 0.00 PITKIN COUNTY CO TBD Resolution No 16 of 2001 Resolution No 16 of 2001 Resolution No 16 of 2001 MECHANICAL TBD STRUCTURAL TBD FINALLY, adopted. passed and approved this 14/h day of May, 2001, CONTRACTOR 4Â£45<IUR TBD *gchel E. Richards, M~or 511'6Â·31.. 1 Tent)14 DATE OF PUBLICATION ~ ~1~,3, Akelc , Kathryn S. 1Â¢6ch, City Clerk G plann,lgiaspe,Vhpc/casevinndmirk/101//loid SD 6/30/14 HPC CONCEPT. REV. PROJECT NO: 1411 DRAWN BY KPT COPYRIGHT FORUM PHI, LLC 1 illiji Imn im '11,1 iii lim 011111 'llii 1111 lili 455762 06/25/2001 11:21A ORDINANC DAVIS SILVI 4 of 4 R 20.00 0 0.00 N 0.00 PITKIN COUNTY CO SHEET TITLE LAND USE Resolution No 16 of 2001 APPROVALS RESOLUTION OF THE ASPEN PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION APPROVING AN APPLICATION FOR HISTORIC LANDMARK DESIGNATION FOR THE PROPERTY LOCATED AT 101 E, HALLAM D. Neighborhood Character. The Ktructure or site is a significant component of STREET, LOT A AND THE WE.ST 4.86 FEET OF LOT B, CITY AND an historically significant neighhn,hood and the preservation of the structure or TOWNSITE OF ASPEN, toi.ORADO site is important for the maintenance of that neighborhood character FORUM PHI PARCEL ID#2735-124-37-001 E. Commun/4, Character. The structure or site is critical to the preservation of the character of the Aspen con,munity because <,f its relationship in terms of size, location and architectural similarity to other structures or sites of historical or RESOLL 11ON A O. 17, SFRIES OF 2001 architectural importance, and 9 HEREAS, the applicants. Jim and Patricia Gorman. have requested Historic Landmark WHEREAS, during a dul)Â· not,ced public hearing on April 17.2001, the Aspen Planning; De,ignation for the pn,pert> located at 101 E. I iallam Street, Lot A and the west 4.86 lUci md Zoning Commission considered the recommendation made h> the Commwity 715 West Main Street. Suite 204 of Lot B, Block 65. City and Townsite of Aspen. Colorado. 1-he property is currently Development Direclo~ and HPC. took and considered public testimony and Aspen, Colorado 81611 listed on the 'Â·Inventory of Historic Sites and Structures": and recommended, by a vote of 5 10 0, that City Council appro~re landmark designation P 9702794157 F: 866.770 5585 finding that Stwidards A.B. D and E are met WHEREAS, pursuant to Section 26.420 020, requests for landmark designation shall be . reviewed and recommended for approval. approval with conditions. or disapproval by the NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED: Community Development Director. by the HPC. and by the Planning and /oning Commission at a public hearing, and then apprmÂ·ed, approved with conditions. or That the Planning and Zoning Commission recommends Council approve landmark 101 E HALLAM disapproved m a public hearing by the City Council: and designation for IDI L. Hallam Streei. Lot A and the west 4.86 leet of Lot B. Block 65. HALLAM LLC City and Townsite of Aspen. Colorado 101 E Hallam St Aspen, Colorado 81611 WHEREAS, the Community Development Director performed an analysis 01' the application based on the standards. found favorabl> for the application. and APPROVED by the Commission at its regular meeting on April 17.2001. recommended approval of landmark designation: und WIIEREAS, the Aspen Historic Preservation Commission reviewed and recommended APPROVED AS TO FORM: PLANNING AND ZONING approval of landniark designation by a vote o f 5-1 on April l l . 2(1) 1. and COMMISSION: WHEREAS, all applications for 1 listoric Landmark Designation shall meet two or more of the following Standards for Designation of Section 26.420.010 in order for P&/. to E--1 3 L /~Ili_ grant approval. namibÂ·: City Attomev V Robert 11 a,ch, C halr A. Historied Imp,inance: I he structure or site is a principal or secondar> structure or site commonly idenified or associated with a person or event of historical significance to the cultural, social, or political history of Aspen. the ATTEST: state of Colorado. or the United States. H. A rchiticfural Imporrance, The gructure or .,te reflects an architectural style I that ic unique. dislinct or of traditional Aswn character. or the structure or site CONSULTANTS embodies the disting,Ii,hlng characteristics of a significant or mique architectural ~Kie 1.othian. Deput> C it> Clerk. t>pe (based on h,]ilding farm or use) or specimen. SURVEYOR Aspen Survey Engineers. Inc, C. Designer. The structure is a significant work of an architect or designer 210 S Galena Street whose indiudual work has influenced the character of Aspen Aspen Colorado 81611 (970) 925-3816 aspensurveyors@gmail.corn 1111111111111111111111111111111111 lilli 111111111111 lili 1111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111 CIVIL 455768 06/25/2001 11:24A RESOLUTI DAVIS SILVI 455768 08/25/2001 11:24A RESOLUTI DAVIS SILVI TBD 1 of 2 R 10.00 0 0.00 N 0.00 PITKIN COUNTY CO 2 of 2 R 10.00 D 0.00 N 0.00 PITKIN COUNTY CO Resolution No 17 of 2001 Resolution No 17 of 2001 MECHANICAL TBD 4 Standard: The proposed development enhances or does not diminish from the conditions o f approval are known auld understood and must meet with the Historic architectural character or integrity of a designaicd historic structure or pal RESOLUTION OF THE ASPEN HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION Preservation Officer prior to applying for the building permit, thereof, and APPROVING AN APPLICATION FOR FINAL DEVELOPMENT AND 9. The General Contractor and/or Superintendent shall be required to obtain a STRUCTURAL VARIANCES FOR THE PROPERTY LOCATED AT 101 E. HALLAM STREET, specialty license in historic preservation prior to receiving a building permit. TBD WHEREAS, Amy Guthrie, in her staff report dated October 10, 2001, performed an LOT A AND THE WEST 4.86 FEET OF LOT B, AND 105 E. HALLAM STREET, 1 0. The applicant shall provide a plan for the active protection and shoring of the shed analysis of the application based on the standards, and recommended approval of the THE EAST 25.14 FEET OF LOT B ANDTHE WEST 8 FEET OF LOT C, BLOCK on 105 E. Hallam. This plan, as well as thorough documentation of the existing 65, CITY AND TOWNS]TE OF ASPEN, COLORADO project; and shed, including photographs and measured d,awings, will be required prior to issuance of building permit. WHEREAS, at their regular meeting on October 10,2001. the Historic Preservation PARCEL ID#2735-12+37-001& 2735-124-37-002 Commission considered the application, found the application to meet the standarÂ·ds and CONTRACTOR 11. The applicant shall provide the City with a written agreement between themselves and the owner of 105 E. Hallam Street describing that measures that will be taken to be consistent with the "City of Aspen Histonc Preservation Design Guidelines" and RESOLUTION #45, SERIES OF 2001 to protect the half of the shed that it is hoped can be preserved, and the manner in TBD approved the application by a vote of 4 to 2. which any damage that may occur shall be corrected. WHEREAS, the applicants, Am and Patricia Gorman, represented by Mary Holley, have NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED: requested Final Development approval and Variances for the property located at 101 E, Hallam Street, Lot A and the west 4.86 feet of Lot B, and 105 E. Hallarn Sireet, the east That F]nal Development and Vanances for the property located at 101 E. Hailarn Street 25.14 feet of Lot B and the west 8 teet of Lot C, Block 65, City and Townsile of Aspen, Lot A and the west 4.86 feet of Lot B, Block 65, City and Townsite of Aspen and 105 E. 7Q/2014 DATE OF PUBLICATION The properties have both been listed on the "Inventory of Historic Sites and Structures"; Hallam Street, the east 25.14 feet of Lot B and the west 8 feet of Lot C, Block 65. City and APPROVED BY THE COMMISSION at its regular meeting on the 10th day of and October, 2001. Townsite of Aspen be approved with the following conditions: WHEREAS, all development in an "H," Histonc Overlay Distnet or development 1 The HPC has granted the followlng variances. a.5 footwest side yard variance for involving a historic landmark must meet all four Development Review Standards of the existing house, a 5 foot east side yard varlance to build in the location of the Section 26.72.010(D) of the Aspen Land Use Code in order for HPC to grant approval, existing shed, a 3 5 foot west sideyard variance for new construction (the linking namely Approved as to Form: element), a 5.5 foot combined sideyard setback variance, a 9.4 foot combined front and rear yard setback variance, a 5 foot rear yard setback variance, and 1. Standard: The proposed development is compatible in general design, massing waiver of one parking space. and volume, scale and site plan with designated historic structures located on the 2 The HPC hereby grants the following vanances for the shed on [05 E. Hallam 0 -4- parcel and with development on adjacent parcels when the subject site is in a "H, Street, in the event that the board a*eeS that it must be reconstructed due to 6/30/14 HPG CONCEPT. REV. Historic Overlay District or is adjacent to an Historic Landmark. For historic conditions that cannot be forseen at this time. a rear yard setback variance of 5 feet Davfd Hoefer, Assistant Eity Attorney SD landmarks where proposed development would extend Into front yard, side yard and and a west sideyard setback vanan<e of 5 feet to allow it to be rebuilt in its current re. yard setbacks. extend into the minimum distance between buildings on the lot, location. exceed the allowed noor arca by up to five hundred (500) square feet, or exceed Ac 3. Information on all venting locations and meter locations shall be provided for HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION Approved as to content: PROJECT NO. 1411 allowed site covered by up to five (5) percent, HPC may grant necessary varianccs review and approval by staffand momtor when the infonnation ib available. DRAWN BY: KPT after making a finding that such variation is more compatible in character with the 4, Submit a demolition pian, as part of the building permit plan set, indicating historic landmark and the neighborhood than would be development in accord with exactly what areas of the shed are lo be removed. 499//MÂ»f dimensional requirements. Ln no cvcnt shall variations pursuant to this Section 5. No elements are to be added to tho historic house thar did not previously exist. No COPYRIGHT FORUM PHI, LLC - exceed those variations allowed undor Section 26,320.640(8*2), for detached existing exterior materials other than what has been speci fically approved herein SuzaÂ°~7/Reid, Chair accessory dwelling units, and may be removed without the approval ofstaffand monitor. 6. HPC staff and monitor must approve the type and location of all exterior lighting 2 Standard: The proposed development reflects and is consistent with the fixtures. ATTEST: character of the neighborhood of the parcel proposed for development. 7 There shall be no deviations from the extertor elevations as approved without first being reviewed and approved by HPC staff and monitor. 3. Standard: The proposed development enhances or does not detract from the 8. The applicant shall be required to provide the contractor with copies of the HPC 42Â«<f... ~.4(a-J- historic significance of designated historic structures located on Se parcel resolution applicable to this project. The contractor must submit a letter Kathy Str*kland, Chief Deputy Clerk proposed for development or on adjacent parcels. addressed to HPC staff as part of the building permit application indicating that all SHEET TITLE F kill li~ I li ll li ~li ~ Il I Illizi i lill m i Illi li I jil I 11/21/2001 le 13A D 0.00 SILVIA DAVIS 'ITKIN COUNTY 50 . 15 0/ 0 0 .0 461105 Page 1 of 3 Pâ€¢gâ€¢ 2 of 3 Pag, 3 / 3 1.#11,1,11~~111~1@#00 461105 461105 11/21/2001 10 13/ .b. Dhi~ D:TKI. Col,NTÂ¥ CO .1/ /3 . e le Himinummuiumi,IMMIRINIMHH 11/21/200 1 10 139 LAND USE Resolution No. 45 of 2001 Resolution No. 45 of 2001 Resolution No 45 of 2001 APPROVALS $ CITY MONUMENT SÂ¥1 4 CORNER BLOCK 64 10 20 (1)<HOR ZON'AL CONTROL A LEGEND AND NOTES BEAR NGS BASED ON FOUND CITY MONUMENTS AS SHOWN N Â·4â€¢5) 49-E O SE- SURVEY MONUMENT - 25947 SURVEÂ¥ CONTROL S UT,LITY BOX o i FENCE WOOD OR METAL TINE NFORMAT'ON FURNISHED BY P -KIN COUNTY l ITLE INC CASE NO PCT 2405 IW DA-ED MAÂ¥ 5 20,4 ZONED -R-6 H- SE-BACKS AS PER RESOULT ION â€¢45 SERIES OF 2002 NO .INGER N EFFEC' AS PER COA PLANNING EAST STORAGE PERGOLA PATIO, SPA CONC AND FENCES ENCROACH INTO 7 8,1/ 1 /1 Alf Â· ROW & AS SIOWN STRFLY / STREET 1]GHT 1 r.\-- 1 ; O MAIL---K 1 / BOX --*- - /if I 6 l / 1 % 1 S 759- -i_ 1 # 34-*~__-_- I li 1 1 1 1 1 1 I rÂ·- In i 1 43 r\---' 7 1 U POVCH B 11 1 3 + 22 1 + I 1 - 4 Ill . 1 1 iii/ 1 1 0, N 1 1 . 4 . Inr HOUSE / 1 It-' P i .101- 4 2 11 1 1 1 t 9 - Â· 1 1 '*, f HCOUSE f----i---2-9Jf-20-P--\-- .-+Ll I! e i . 81(,c, il S -- P/ic ,. 91 1 1 0, pÂ» .1-4--3TGRAGE J r=-2---J 1 f 1 1 1 Ej ! 4 1 20 - , 1 PERGOLA I -9, LL L I li PAT ;C, I j / / STONE 1 11 -31 ] , 7-41 1 ~ / 6/ % CERTIFICATION 1 11 f ~/ i~ / 204 1 -9 -\ ~ , 1 JOIN -10#ORTH HEREBY CER'IFY TO PAR LLC AND PITKIN COUNTY TÂ·TLE, iNC AND/OR dSÂ·GNS THA- 7/5 15 Ap 'IMAOVEMEN' SJRVEY NAT- AS DEFINED BY CRS 38-5 I- 0229 4 --9 41 L.4-_- 1 / AND THA- IT IS A MONJMENTED J.ND SURVEY SHOWING THE LOCATION OF ALL STRUCTURES, 1 1 /5 8-2 JTILITIES, ENCES HEDGES OR WALLS SITUATED ON THE DESCRIBED PARCEL AND WITWINÂ·Â·PIVE.@#END' 4-- 86UNDARIES O= SUCH PARCEL ANY CONIFLICT NG BOUNDARY EV;DENCE f ... 1 " OR '15 *MENTS, iND Ali EASEMENTS UNDEAGROUND UT'LIT ES, AND TUNNELS --' - DEsca i 44'jeÂ©VNTY -1 TLE, NC , COMMITMENT FOR -ITLE INSURANCE ~2*1 1 1- 4 ONC \ DATED<d S IGNEA:Â·13*G. i Kt.Â·,= 1 1 414#NfkwergÂ·Â· 45 25947 -r B u 'LI NO 2/ ' -Jt-b Z--i --- YE.L OW- -< 29036 -- , IMPROVEMENT SURVEY c e 'C ALLEY BLOC OC GRI'E' 4 65 LO- A AND THE ES-ERLY 4 I FEET OF LO' 8, BLOCK 65, C' 9 IND -OWNS -E OF ASPEN CON" % 3 486 SQ F- Â·/ 9 --1 PREURED BY - ASPEN SURVEY ENGINEERS INC 210 SOU.H G/LENIA STREET : / r. MONUMENT SW ASPEN. CO.ORADO BIÂ¢>t NOTICE ACCORDING TO COLOIDO .. YOU MUST C.INCE ANY LEGAL * -- CORNER BLOCK 65 ACTION ~SED UPON ANY DEFECT ON THIS PLAT WI THIN THREE Â¢EARS ~ PIONE/@â€¢x ( 3035 925 38 1 AFTER You FIR. DiscoyE' sucH DEFEcr I. NO EVEN- I. A.. ACT ION BASED UP014 ;NY DEFET J. huS PLI . COPMENCED MORE THAk TEN JOB DATE YEARS FROM THE DATE of THE CERT,Fi CA110â€¢1 SHOWN -REON THE 25 08 CeiTIFICATION IS Yol[ 1. NOT WET STAMPED ~!Th -HE SEA. OF THE - 4/ 14 40RTH GARMISCH STREET FORUM PHI 715 West Main Street Suite 204 Aspen, Colorado 81611 P 970279 4157 F 866 770 5585 Zoning Allowance & Project Summary 101 E Hallam St 101 E HALLAM HALLAM LLC ~poied Development *-- ~Single E~ily I Romodil/â€¢.ddition 101 E Hallam St .L."-1.-J.1-Illâ€ž,1/ .i,- . ' '' . Aspen, Colorado 81611 |27351247001 Zone District *8 Allowed ~1Proposed 4 t- Existing (Principal) dprincipal) Reference 10 10 10 26 710 04002 Rear-Pincipal 10 1010 26710040 D 3 4 (Setback Variance Res 4 (Setback Vanance Res Rear-Accessory .No 21998) 5 No 21998) I26.710.040.0.3. Side 5 5 5 96.710.040.04 0Distance between Bul'dings 5 5 ~~ ~26.710.040.0 9 - Corner Lot yes yes ~ ~ Sulvey ~pplemental Breakdown Info - Existing ' ' ~Required . p ~ Iprop... ,, I #9~ %11.~~1'2~6*f IR--nce INet Leasable/Comm SQ FT N/A N/A N/A ppen Space % WA Not Required for R-6 N/A p6 710 040 0.10 22 CONSULTANTS Not Required for 1-6 ~ - SURVEYOR Site Coverage N/A <6,000 sq ft N/A 26 710 040 0 7 -Â· Aspen Survey Engineers, Inc, On-Sde Parking 1 2 1 210 S Galena Street . i Aspen, Colorado 81611 1.and VAP*#umma,1 ' '~-~ J' ~ ~ Atd VI|Ii ~ ,~ G ~74' ~'Â· ~Referince (970) 925-3816 Land Â»2,362.500 Pitkin County Assessor aspensurveyors@gmail.com Improvements $340,000 CIVIL Pitkin County Assessor Total ~$2.702.500 Pitkin County Assessor TBO MECHANICAL Net Lot Area TBD 101 E Hallam St LRI'Ince 4 ~ne District Requirements Min Gross Lot Area (per R-6) ~6,000 Sq Ft , 3,000 Sq Ft for Histork Landmark Properties - _ . ~6 710 040 D 1 STRUCTURAL Min Net Lot Area (per R-6) ~4.500 Sq Ft, 3,000 Sq Ft for Histonc Lar~Imark Propoenies I26 710 040 D 2 TBD Lot Size Pe_r Survey M ... . Survey Reference ' 3 Reductions for area with slopes 0%-20% (100% of parcel area to be | included in Net Lot Area) ~N/A 26 575 020-1 Reductions for area with slopes 20%-30% (50% of parcel area to be Â»*- - -7 CONTRACTOR tincluded in Net L~Ma) p/A - 121575 020-1 ~keductions for area with slopes greater than 30% (0% of parcel area to be i Prvey ~~1 TBD Included in Net Lot Area) IN/A 26 575 020Â·-1 Total Area Reductions I i 10 Net Lot Area |3,486 Sq Ft ' ~ |Su,vey 7/2/2.4 DATE OF PUBLICATION Allowable Floor Area 101 E Hallam St Allowillo Floor Ama R-ma Per R-6 26 710 060 2,536.08 square feet (2.400 square feet of floor area. plus 28 square feet of floor ayea for each additional 100 square feet In SD 6/30/14 HPC CONCEPT. REV. Net Lot Area, up to a maximum of 3240 square feet) Unlque Approvals Reference PROJECT NO 1411 DRAWN BYÂ· KPT R-IncI V.an'll COPYRIGHT FORUM PHI LLC bmptio- Reference Garage Exemption First 250 sq n exempt: Next 250 sq ft to exclude 50% of area. An 26 575 020 D 7 2-005 15% of gross = 380 4 exempt 26 575 020 D 5 Z- Deck Exemption Front Forch Exempt = 52.50 square feet 005 & Z-006 Floor Ana Summary Existing Gross (Sq Ft) Existing Floor Area (Sq Ft) Proposed GroI (Sq Ft) Proposed Floor Area (Sq Ft) Referance Lower Level 1,747.50 53.15 Z-004 Garage (located on Main Level) 297.75 23.88 Z-005 SHEETTITLE Main Level 1,184.75 1,18475 1.17600 1,176 00 Z-005 Common Building 108.00 108.00 108.00 108.00 Z-005 Deck Area 460.25 000 400.00 0.00 Z-005 & Z-006 Upper Level 963.75 963 75 1,13725 1,13725 Z-006 Z-001 TOTAL 4 2,710.75 2,256.50 4,866.50 2,498.27 ZONING SUMMARY Residential Design Standards Unique Approvals & Vanances Residential Design Standards Compliance See Land Use Approvals for complete list of approved resolutions and/or admin approvals 101 E Hallam Street RDS Section Code Description Compliance De.criptin * Referenced Z Sheets - FORUM PHI A. Site Design 1. Building orientation. , The front facades of all principal structures shall be parallel to the street On corner lots. both This lot Is a corner lot and the existing street facing facades are parallel to theintersecting , Sur.rey street-facing facades must be parallel to the Intersecting streets On curvilinear streets, the , streets I front facade of all structures shall be parallel to the tangent of the midpoint of the arc of the ~ 1 street Parcels as outlined m Subsection 26 410 010 B 4 shall be exempt from this | requirement One (1) element,such as a bay window or dormer placed ata front corner of the building may be on a diagonal from the street if desired 1 715 West Main Street, Suite 204 2. Build-to lines. On parceIs or lots of less than fifteen thousand (15,000) square feet. at least sixty percent This lot :s a corner lot and more than 60% of the facade is wahin 5Â· of the minimum setback Z-003 (60%) of the front fagade shall be within five (5) feet of the minimum front yard setback line Aspen, Colorado 81611 On corner sites. this standard shall be met on the frontage with the longest block length P: 970.279.4157 F 866 770 5585 Porches may be used to meet the sixty percent (60%) standard 3. Fences. , Fences hedgerows and planter boxes shall not be more than forty-two (42) inches high The existing 3 ft wrought-iron fence is existing to remain 1 Z-003 measured from natural grade. in all areas forward of the front facade of the house Man-made 1 berms are prohibited in the front yard setback 101 E HALLAM B. Building Form 1. Secondary mass. All new single-family and duplex structures shall locate at least ten percent (10%) of their total ~ This Icyt contains an existing historic structure to remain that predates the RDS Survey ' HALLAM LLC square footage above grade in a mass which is completely detached from the principal 101 E Hallam St building or linked to it by a subordinate linking element This standard shall only apply to parcels w,thin the Aspen infill area pursuant to Subsection 26 410 010 B 2 Accessory Aspen, Colorado 81611 buildings such as garages, sheds and accessory dwelling units are examples of appropnate uses for the secondary mass A subordinate linking element for the purposes of linking a primary and secondary mass shall be at least ten (10) feet in length, not more than ten (10) feet in width, and with a plate height of not more than nine (9) feet Accessible outdoor space over the linking element (e g a deck),s permitted but may not be covered or enclosed Any railing for an accessible outdoor space over a linking element must be the minimum reasonably necessary to provide adequate safety and building code compliance and the railing must be 50% or more transparent C. Parking, Garages and 1. For all residential uses a) Parkng garages and carports shall be accessed from an alley or private road The proposed garage is accessed from the alley 2-003 Carports that have access from an alley or private road. the b) If the garage doors are visible from I street or aliey. then they shall be single-stall doors or The proposed garage door is a single stall door Z-202 following standards shall double-stall doors designed to appear like single-stall doors apply: c) 1/ the garage doors are not visible from a street or alley, the garage doors may be either The proposed garage door is a single stall door Z-202 single-stall or normal double-stall garage doors 2. For all residential uses , a) On the street facing facade(s), the width of the living area on the first floor shall be at least The garage ls accessed via an alley therefore this section does not apply, Z-003 that have access only from five (5) feet greater than the width of the garage or carport a public street, the CONSULTANTS following standards shall b) The front facade of the garage orthe front-most supporting column of a carport shall be set The3 garage is accessed via an alley therefore this section does not apply Z-003 be applyÂ· L back at least len (10) feet further from the street than the front-most wall of the house SURVEYOR - - Aspen Survey Engineers. Inc c) On lots of at least fifteen thousand (15,000) square feet in size, the garage or carport may The garage s accessed via an alley therefore this section does not apply Z-003 210 S Galena Street be forward of the front facade of the house only if the garage doors or carport entry are perpendicular to the street (side-loaded) Aspen, Colorado 81611 (970) 925-3816 aspensurveyors@gmall.com d) When the floor of a garage or carport is above or below the street level, the driveway cut The garage is accessed via an alley therefore this section does not apply Z-003 within the front yard setback shall not exceed two (2) feet in depth, measured from natural CIVIL grade TBD e) The vehicular entrance width of a garage or carport shall not be greater than twenty-four The garage is accessed via an alley therefore this section does not apply 2-003 (24)feet f) Ifthe garage doors are visible from a public street or alley then they shall be single-stall The garage is accessed via an alley therefore this section does not apply Z-003 ~ doors or double-sta~1 doors designed to appear like single-stall doors --- MECHANICAL D. Building Elements 1. Street oriented entrance All single-family homes and duplexes except as outlined in Subsection 26 410 010 8 4 shall The existing histonc house has a street-oriented entrance and a street facing principal window Z-201 TBO and principal window. have a street-oriented entrance and a street facing principal widow Multi-family units shall to remain have at least one (1 ) street-oriented entrance for every four (4) units and front unrts must have a street facing a princlpal window On corner lots, entnes and pincipal windows should face whichever street has a greater block length Thus standard shall be satisfied,Â¥ al of the following condrtions are met - STRUCTURAL a) The entry door shall face the street and be no more than ten (10) feet back from the front- The existing entry doortoremain is nomorethanten (10) feet back fromthefront most wall of Z-102 TBD most wall of the building Entry doors shall not be taller than eight (8) feet the building and ts not taller than eight (8) feet b) A covered entry porch of fifty (50 ) or more square feet, with a minimum depth of six (63 The existing histon/ front porch is greater than 50 square feet with a minimum depth of 6 feet 2-003& Z-102 feet. shall be part of the front facade Entry porches and can oples shall not be more than one (1 ) story in height c) A street-facing principa] window requires that a significant window or group of windows face The existing street-facing facades contain significant groups of windows 2-201 & Z-202 CONTRACTOR street TBD 2. First stol element. All residential buildings shall have a first story street facing element the width of which Thus lot contains an existing histonc structure to remain that predates the RDS Z-003 comprises at least twenty percent (20%) of the building's overall width and the depth of which is at least six (6 ) feet from the wall the first story element is projecting from Assuming that the first story element includes interior living space, the height of the first story elernent shall not exceed ten (10) feet, as measured to the plate height A first story element may be a porch or living space Accessible space (whether it Is a deck, porch or enclosed area) shall not be 7/2/014 DATE OF PUBLIITION allowed over the first story element. however, accessible space over the remaining first story elements on the front fagade shall not be precluded 3. Windows a) Street.facing windows shall not span through the area where a second floor level would The existing and proposed street-facing windows do not span through nine (9) and twelve (12) Z-201 & Z-202 typically exist which Is between nine (9) and twelve feet (12) above the finished first floor For feet above the finished first floor interior staircases this measurement w,11 be made fromthe first landing,f one exists A transom window above the main entry,s exempt from this standard 1 b) No more than one (1) non-orthogonal window shall be allowed on each facade of the , The existing historic contains one non-orthogonal windows to rdhÂ·lain All proposed windows ~ Z-201 & Z-202 building A single non-orthogonal widow ina gable end may be divided with millions and still 1 are orthogonal be considered one (1) non-odhogonal window The requirement shall only apply to Subsection i 26410 010 B 2 SD 6/30/14 HPC CONCEPT. REV. 4. Lightwells All areaways, lightwells and/or stairwells on the street-facing facade(s) 01 a building shall be ' The pfoposed lightwells are recessed behind the front-most wali of the building and are not Z-003 entirely recessed behind the front-most wall of the building , located on the street-facing facade - - PROJECT NO: 1411 E. Context 1. Materials. ~ a) The quahty of the exterior matenals and details and their application shall be cons,stent on The quality of the exter,or materials and their application is consistent on all sides of the Z.201 & Z-202 - all sides of the building DRAWN BY: KPT building ~ b) Materials shall be usedln ways that are true to their characteristics For instance slucco The use of materials is true to their characteristics Proposed materials will be approved at Z-201 & Z-202 which 6 a light or non-bearing material. shall not be used below a heavy material such as HPC Final Review COPYRIGHT FORUM PHI, LLC stone r c) Highly reflective surfaces shall not be used as extenor materials There are no proposed highly reflective materials Proposed materials wia be approved at Z-201 & Z-202 HPC Final Review 2. Inflection. The following standard must be met for parcels which are m thousand (63,000) square feet or This parcel is less than six thousand (6,000) square feet therefore this sect on does not apply Sulvey over and as outlined in Subsection 26 410 010 8 2 a> if a one-story building exists directly adjacent to the subject site, then the new construction This parcel is less than six thousand (6,000) square feet therefore this section does not apply Survey must step down to one-story In height along their common lot Ille If there are one-story buildings on both sides of the subject site the applicant may choose the side toward which to i Inflect SHEET TITLE A one-story building shall be dellned as follows A one story building shall mean a structure or This parcel is less than six thousand (6 000) square feet therefore this section does not apply Survey portion of a structure where there ls only one ( 1) floor of fully usable living space, at least twelve (12) feet wide across the street frontage This standard shall be met by providing a one story element which is also at least twelve (12) feet wide across the street frontage and one (1) story tall as far back along the common lot line as the adJacent Z-002 building Is ore (1 ) story RDS COMPLIANCE FORUM PHI E HALLAM STREET E HALL-AM STREET 715 West Main Street. Suite 204 Aspen. Colorado 81611 P 970 279 4157 F 866 770 5585 3-2Â» 101 E HALLAM HALLAM LLC 101 E Hallam St fjft~ ~~ U~~MY&---~- Aspen, Colorado 81611 1 \ \ .---- V- ---sE-f#ci~LINE.7\ A 3 ~Pe . SE 1<: 1 E 1 /1 1 ..1 <5' FRONT YARD SETBACK PER .-003 RDS /2 1 | . 5 -0. . 5'0 'SIDE YARd 1 -- ' SIDE YAR/ '1 5.-0 SIDE YARE SIDE lARE S*, i LINE OF LINE OF 1 1 ,EXTERIOR WALL -Nh, 1-1 ~ 1 'EXTERIOR WALL-=~ ~ ~ ' E----> CONSULTANTS 4-4<20 Lj/' 1 1 SURVEYOR 1% 1 Aspen Survey Engineers, Inc, -1 210 S Galena Street EXISTING 3FT WROUGHT-IRON 2 EXISTING FENCE | - : m FENCE TO REMAIN Aspen. Colorado 81611 PER Z-003 RDS A 3 . k TO REMAIN - 1 /121 . CK (970) 925-3816 aspensurveyors@gmail com a. E . CIVIL TBD 110 -0 | MECHANICAL TBD 1 4 NORTH OF LINE IS L./ -SEE ELEVATIONS EXISTING TO REMAIN ~~SRTTOHR~CFTL~~EE~AIN -~-- Z.201 &Z-202 STRUCTURAL SEE ELEVATIONS L TBD SHEETS Z-201 & Z-2~ Â» L PER Z-003 RDS D 4 .-0. 1 ~1_ TREE TOBIE REMOVED ~._ EGRESS LIGHTWELL T FOR EGRESS LIGHTWELL i '~ CONTRACTOR 1 1 TBD EXISTING FENCE TO REMAIN 1 1 1 PER Z-003 RDS A 3 .Ij EGRESS LIGHTWELL ...==- 1 PER Z-003 RDS D 4 9312Â« 7"lili DATE OF PUBLICATION Ilill-/dIIIIIIIIIL#- T =GI~--------~ z~- Â· '~.1- ACCESS b/Â¤ 9..:.- PER Z-003 Swi ,-./ ua- SD 6/30/14 HPC CONCEPT. REV RDS C.1. I = ff?. ALLEY d/3 1/Rob I ... , d . - 11. Ir. 1,6'h, PROJECT NO. 1411 ALLEY DRAWN BYÂ· KPT COPYRIGHT FORUM PHI. LLC SHEET TITLE 1 PROPOSED SITE PLAN 1/8" = 1'-0" 1X EXISTING SITE PLAN 1/8" = 1-0 Z-003 FLRI-1 N SITE PLAN 148 FRONT YARD alll LNOid LINE OF SETBAC N GARMISCH STREET 133819 HOSWAIBVS N SUBGRADE CALC LEGEND PROPERTY LINE 1.-75 Gq n ~ SUBGRADE WALLAREA FORUM PHI &? 202.75 sq ft 183.00 sq ft |_l EXPOSED WALLAREA 00 , 21'-4" 19'.3" . 19 ~~~7- 1. 2. 3. SETEACS LINE 715 West Main Street. Suite 204 , 91-4" . 4-0" r 12'-314.- ,, 4.-0â€ž '' 24' 31.1 , Aspen, Colorado 81611 PÂ· 970 279 4157 F 866.770 5585 28.00 sq ft 28.00 sq ft 101 E HALLAM 225.25 sq R HALLAM LLC 21-4 512.25 sqft - 6- - - r Aspen, Colorado 81611 101 E Hallam St 53'-11 231-8" 4 5. 703.00 sq M O 2 2Â» 74'-0 6 3 CONSULTANTS P FAR PLAN LEGEND --- - SURVEYOR --- Aspen Survey Engineers. Inc 210 S Galena Street ~ COUNTABLE FLOOR AREA Aspen. Colorado 81611 (970) 925-3816 aspensurveyors@gmail com L_~ EXEMPT FRONT PORCH CIVIL TBD â‚¬>-- -----------------------------Â«D ~ EXEMPT DECK * 00 Existing Floor Area Calculations â€ž 101 E Hallam St ~ 50% EXEMPT -GARAGE MECHANICAL r ' ' 1 .- - TBD Existing Lower Level Floor Area Calculations W ~~~~~~~ 100% EEXXEEMMPPTT -- GGAARRAAGGEE ilower Level Gross Floor Ares (Sq Ft) 0.00 I ~awL,Â¥11(ofintiWIFIa~klamq Fq 0.00 6,-3_--_-_ -+--L-_-_-_---_......_......_-___@ Writ~6-. Floorâ€¢6~6,cuâ€¢-''Al"."PM 'f-Â·~%'t. 13,Â·1 1 1,747.50 sq ft STRUCTURAL TBD Lower Level Floor Area (Sq Ft) 000 Main Level Floor Area (Sq Ft) 1292.75 . Upper Level Floor Area (Sq Ft) 96375 ~ CONTRACTOR Deck/Porch Floor Area (Sq Ft) 0 00 6 Total Existing Floor Area (Sq Fl) 09Â·Â·. | 4 TBD (iÂ» -- -----4.1----Â· --VE- -1-----0 0 Proposed Floor Area Calculations i 7,2/014 DATE OF PUBLICATION 101 E Hallam St ~~_~~~~,~ i 1 1 p ..~11- fÂ·' '~14' - Propc)-d Lower Level Exposed Wall Calculations Low,r La,1Wailibel | Total Wall Area (Sq R) Expoled Wall Areal#,EL â‚¬Â»-- ----------P--------.- - Â«i) 1 ' 202.75 000 1 1 2 Â· 183.00 000 3 14.75 0.00 1 4 512 25 56 00 5 i 225 50 0 00 tu 1--1=== ?? 6 703.00 SD 6/30/14 HPC CONCEPT. REV. 0 00 ~verall Total Wall Area (Sq Ft) | 1,841.25 - - ~xposed Wall Area (Sq Ft) . 56.00 PROJECT NO: 1411 Â® DRAWN BY: KPT % of Exposed Wall (Sq Ft) (Expeed / I9tal) , | 3.04% 0 --2-------------1, 23'-81" ~ .&,U*,1Â· - iProposed Lower Level Floor Area Calculations COPYRIGHT FORUM PHI. LLC Lower Level Gross Floor Area (Sq Ft) 1.747 50 6/.F.Â· ~*M Level Eountable Floor Amp, Ft) le#c . 1 63.15 1.747.5 x 3.04% 1.*f 1 i ,Lower Level Floor Area (Sq Ft) 53.15 - 1 Main Level Floor Area ( Sq Ft) 1307 88 Upper Level Floor Area (Sq Ft) 113725 Deck/Porch Floor Area (Sq Ft) 000 SHEET TITLE Total Proposed Floor Area (Sq Ft) 1 0 (D Â© 00 PROPOSED LOWER LEVEL 3/16'1 = 1'-0 NO EXISTING LOWER LEVEL Z-004 1117-1 N FLOOR AREA 148 CALCULATIONS "96.9 PROPERTYLINE PROPERTY LINE FORUM PHI 00 9 0 0 01 9 0 SETEACB LINE SETBACK LINE 715 West Main Street. Suite 204 Aspen, Colorado 81611 P 970 279 4157 F: 866 770 5585 1 1 1 16*---: / 4- -6 pER~~~;CoT5 -7- ,~42~48>9 EXEMPT FRONT PORCH 101 E HALLAM /'%4M-iNW / h.. PER RDS 26 575 020 D 5 1%/1/ HALLAM LLC 101 E Hallam St â‚¬)- -L. . *,Â«2/ /4* iÂ·1'9252?M ' Aspen, Colorado 81611 6 6>- ..1 FAR PLAN LEGEND ~ hu 1 -77 1 11 1 ~ COUNTABLE FLOOR AREA 1 i|r ~ EXEMPT FRONT PORCH L-=22 , i F 394 ~~ EXEMPT DECK ~ LM =N 4 ~ 50% EXEMPT - GARAGE 1 L i _-1 E E ~ 100% EXEMPT - GARAGE ~ ---3 , Ir---7 111 izzz- [722-2 CONSULTANTS Iii i '16 2 SURVEYOR 1 tv -1 Aspen Survey Engineers, Inc, 210 S Galena Street Existing Floor Area Calculations Aspen, Colorado 81611 (970) 925-3816 101 E Hallam St I'[ aspensurveyors@gmail com fl i ~gisting Maint-evelfloo,Are,Calculation, tkfi*i ~-i~~~0**-i;: j A 'Â¥'Â·7.2%11'~ .' r,~ 2 .b "79 CIVIL Main Level Gross Floor Area (Sq F~ -_1184 75 (iÂ» 4//T ------------- ------ -1-0 (iÂ» 111.=//.u----5 -----Â«D TBD Common Bullding Gross Floor Area (Sq Ft) i 108 00 EXEMPT FRONT 1 1 1 PORCH PER R[}3 1 â€¢ 4 ' EXEMPT FRONT PORCH iMÂ® Level Countable Floor Area (Sq Ft) 1292.75 PER RDS 26.575.020.D.5 --3' 26 575 020 D5 ,~~~t ~~~ ~~ ' i - 11 1 ~4 Z 101.F# h F | MECHANICAL b*ting Deck,Porctfloor Area 9!glations .4, 4.22 J. - 4 , TBD Exempt per RDS 1 Front Porch Gross Floor Area (Sq Ft) 165 00 2.575 020 0 5 5 ,/>2~4 ' /2. 1 'filell billi Deck Gross Floor Area (Sq Ft)(Man & Upper Levels) 351 25 - ~1;401 gross = 3841-exempt ~~~= ~' . . ~~ '9 / 17 1 ' Qk-,------------- 1 ----~--Â«D (fÂ» - ~eck/Porch Countable Floor Area (Sqft) - 0.00 1 4 STRUCTURAL |rotalexistingfloo.Areacalculation. ': 64,Â· - 4 <3';;f ~ F-'~0,0Â·4" ' i. 0~69(â€ž -1 1 11 TBD 11 Lower Level Floor Area (Sq Ft) 0 00 1.176.00 sqft J 1,184.75 sq n | II Main Level Floor Area (Sq Ft) __ _ _ 1292.75 Upper Level Floor Area (Sq Ft) 963.75 -1...2=== CONTRACTOR Deck/Porch Floor Area (Sq Fl) 000 T ot/1 Existing Floor Area (Sq Fll 2,256.50 . ~ . '~~Lt: J ) TBD Ff'-- Â® 1 lili 50% E> EMPT PER 47.75 sq ft 26.575 )20.0 7 --~ L-/ *d 111 Proposed Floor Area Calculations - I 4 190.00 sq ft 101 E Hallam St EXISTING DECK 7/2/2014 DATE OF PUBLICATION , TO BE REMOVED ' ' N. ~roposed Main Level Floo,Area Calculations 44;iiÂ¢Ii<: - '' . ~~'- f Â·i: ~ 7.4,4 u f â‚¬1---------------- =I'..'i== - ~ - -Hi) â‚¬-------------- -1- . I. -----IB Main Level Gross Floor Area (Sq Ft) 108 00 100% EXEMPT PER 250.00 sq R 26.575.320.0 7 1 *ain Level Countable Floor Area (Sq Ft) 1284.00 . . n--- -3 1 >U; 1...'4. :Il :4 ~ <F LvA%Â·9 4~ Propoled Garage Flooribea Calculall* 1 Â· : 1./1 1 Garage Gross Floor Area (Sq Ft) - | 297.78 SD 6/30/14 HPC CONCEPT. REV. ---- 1 1 Garage Countable E!901 Area (Sq Ft) 23.88 26.757 020 D.7 1 .1 filge Countable Floor Area (Sq Ft) Â«Or C 1 2 - 231 2,1 1 - - . 1 hlm/*101 //J DRAWN BYÂ· KPT PROJECT NO: 1411 ~roposed Deckmorch Floor Area Calculations " 1 1 *I 1 1 Exempt per RDS 1I - Front Porch Gross Floor Area (Sq Ft) 1 165 00 26 575 020 05 ' ' COPYRIGHT FORUM PHI. LLC Deck Gross Floor Arga (Sq FU (Main & Upper Levels) 266 00 15% of gross = 380 4 exempt 1 108 00 sdi n 108 00 4 n ~ck/Porch Countille Flolr*- (Sq Ft; | O.00 , 1 0 1 1 1 1 1 1 ~rot@!Propo,ed FloorA- Calculations , /4 t .. 1 4- UL JÂ·fi 1 Lower Level Floor Area (Sq Ft) 5315 Main Level Floor Area (Sq Ft) 1307 88 Upper Level Floor Area (Sq Ft) 1137 25 Deck'Porch Floor Area (Sq Ft) 0 00 0 6 02 00 SHEET TITLE Metal Proposed Floor Area (Sq Ft) ' 2,498.27 -_ PROPOSED MAIN LEVEL FAR 3/16" = 1'-0" EXISTING MAIN LEVEL FAR 3/16" =1 -0 Z-005 QU----1 N FLOOR AREA 148 CALCULATIONS PROPERTY LINE PROPERTY LINE FORUM PHI 1 11 SETBACK LINE SETBACK LINE 715 West Main Street, Suite 204 Aspen. Colorado 81611 1 1 P: 970 279 4157 F 866 770 5585 1 Ill ~ 101 E HALLAM HALLAM LLC 101 E Hallam St (D- -- . 1 ---~- -KE) â‚¬>- --i - r.- i 7.7==--7 ------ -8 Aspen. Colorado 81611 AREA EXEMPT PER | | . AREA EXEMPT PER 26 575 050 D 3 FLOOR - 26.575 050.0 3 FLOOR 1 1 AREA <30Â· ' AREA <30 11 11 1 1 1 1 i [7== 5 1 3 -- 1 1 4, 14'- FAR PLAN LEGEND ~ COUNTABLE FLOOR AREA ~ EXEMPT FRONT PORCH - I CONSULTANTS __~ EXEMPT DECK - | SURVEYOR 0% EXEMPT - GARAGE ~ ~ , Ir' ~-~ 4 i Aspen Survey Engineers, Inc. 210 S Galena Street Aspen. Colorado 81611 (970) 925-3816 aspensurveyors@gmail com ~ 100% EXEMPT -GARAGE ~ _ 4,3 1 / 1, 1 963.75 *-1 b- i CIVIL < (D----4 --------- 1-------- ----~-Â«D 6--Â« -t----------p- TBD 1 1 . AREA EXEMPT PER Existing Floor Area Calculations 1.137.25 sci ft AREA EXEMPT PER . AREA <30" It - 26.575 050.0.3 FLOOR 101 E Hallam St --- 26.575.050.0.3 FLOOR |~_____ , ~, f MECHANICAL Axisting Upper Level Floor Area Calculations . .1 4 8/Â£48.4. . 1 11 1 1 - Â·MPPEÂ«vel Gross Floor Area (Sq Ft) 963.75 (ik-- ' 1Upper Livel Countable F!99r -139 Ft) ~ .4-, 4 Â· 963.75 Â·P ~~4~ 'fr.Y~%<t1~,4'-*Jr'.4 1 . 1 1 Ir-------.-- STRUCTURAL 1 11 TBD 1 1 1 -11 Front Porch Gross Floor Area (Sq Ft) 165.00 ~26 575 020 0.5 ' I 1 Deck Gross Floor Area (Sq Ft) 351 25 15% of gross = 380 4 exempt Re@/Porch Countable Floor Area (Sq Ft) | 0Â·00 1 1 | CONTRACTOR 0 1 ----+0 0 1 -----IB ~gtal Existing Floor kea C alculati.*&ttlf Â·Ld-lf. 9- iNÂ·i7.4 -' , TeD Lower Level Floor Area (Sq Ft} Â°Do L , Main LemI Floor Area (Sq Ft) 1292 75 1 - -- Upper Level Floor Area (Sq Ft) 96375 - 7/2/2014 DATE OF PUBLICATION Deck/Porch Floor Area (Sq Ft} 000 ' Total Existing Floor Area (Sq FÂ» -=: ~- ~3 213*m ' L,' h.-1 ~ (i>- ----------------- 11 1 1 1 1 Proposed Floor Area Calculations ~ 1 101 E Hallam St ~ | | ' I 266.00 sqft ~ Proposed Main Level Floor Area Calculations ~ ,~0~6 : 1 i , SD 6/30/14 HPC CONCEPT. REV Upper Level Gross Floor Area (Sq Ft) Â¤ ~ - DRAWN BY: KPT 1137 25 iUppm Level Countable Floor Area (Sq Ft) 4 1137.25 1 PROJECT NO: 1411 al 1 6-----, 0 *BeMd Deck/PofÂ® 2154Lkâ€¢â€¢ Calculations , .4. . ~~1+,1 Exempt per RDS | | Front Pofch Floor Area ( Sq Ft) 165.00 26 575 020 05 1 1 ~ COPYRIGHT FORUM PHI. LLC -1 - Deck Floor Area (Sq Ft) L 266 00 1596 of gross = 380 4 exempt | | p,ck/Porch Countable Flogr Area (Sq Fq | O.00 . ITotal Proposed Floo,Area Calculati~k, a ~ Lower Level Floor Area (Sq Ft) 53.15 _~_ 115 - _0 ' MÂ®-Level Floor Area (Sq Ft) 1307 88 j Upper Level Floor Area (Sq Ft) 1 i DecldPorch Floor Area (Sq Ft) ~ Â© SHEET TITLE |Total Proposed Floor Area (Sq Fl) 4: '~*Â· ~ " 2,498.27 - 00 PROPOSED UPPER LEVEL FAR 3/16"= 1'-0 EXISTING UPPER LEVEL FAR 3/16- = 1'-0" Z-006 4fL[-3 I m FLOOR AREA 148 16 U./ CALCULATIONS PROPERTY LINE FORUM PHI 0 01 + e0 SETBACK LINE 715 West Main Street. Suite 204 Aspen. Colorado 81611 P: 970 279 4157 F 866 770 5585 1 101 E HALLAM HALLAM LLC 101 E Hallam St C Aspen. Colorado 81611 I REC ROOM CONSULTANTS 1 --- - - - - SURVEYOR Aspen Survey Engineers, Inc 210 S Galina Street Aspen. Colorado 81611 (970) 925-3816 , aspensurveyors@gmail com , CIVIL TBD ZÂ·201 MECHANICAL ' TBD D ' TBD BEodOON ~1~~ STRUCTURAL 1 CONTRACTOR TBD â‚¬Â» i - - I Â«D 7/2/2014 DATE OF PUBLICATION 1 - Â«0 4- BECROOM SHOWER 4,]CE: BATH : CLOSE-P | SD 6/30/14 HPC CONCEPT. REV, [Q 1 1 PROJECT NO 1411 â‚¬>--- - A DRAWN BY: KPT COPYRIGHT FORUM PHI, LLC WALL LEGEND , --- 1 ~_| EXISTING WALLTO REMAIN ~ ~ EXISTING WALL TO BEE RE-SIDED ~ NEW WALL h SHEET TITLE O U U -KET 00 ri WALL TO DEMO Z-101 L-/ PROPOSED LOWER LEVEL 3/16" = 1 '-0 NO EXISTING LOWER LEVEL ELR-P-1 N FLOOR PLANS 148 9 47 9 PROPERTY LINE PROPERTY LINE FORUM PHI 9 9 0- 1 0 0Â® V SETBACK LINE SETBACK LINE 715 West Main Street. Su,te 204 Aspen. Colorado 81611 P 970 279 4157 FÂ· 866 770 5585 11 1 1 11 It r.. 1 t.-Â·6-- -~ 1 4 + 101 E HALLAM HALLAM LLC 2----- O ~ Aspen, Colorado 81611 101 E Hallam St -7 -1+-1 Cli re 1 1 1 1 1 6 1 ? I W= f /5 LIVI - 1 1 L---J lili 73- r-1 - C~I ~ LE- 1 1 14 1 1 M-- -- - | rE=~ ILL r--1 - - --- ,U L CONSULTANTS 1 -- 7 210 S Galena Street [~ ~~iÂ°IF1 1 1 f Aspen. Colorado 81611 1 Illill - 1 1 SURVEYOR Aspen Sulvey Engineers. Inc. (970) 925-3816 [3 aspensurmors@gmail com E31 CIVIL TBD -L' 1 L . ,th n ~ . lf---7 DIT|ING 11 / 2X / Ky=T .-5,7 7 1 0-1 1 1 1 N--- 1, MECHANICAL v v 44 v TBD 1 1 ---J : 1 Â® . .1.- =1- -- ~ - Â«i) r-- 1 ~------- 4 11.- =1LL41 NORTH OF LINE IS 1 FIE STRUCTURAL 1 16 KITCHEN EXISTING To REMAIN TBD PANTIn ~ 221 11 SEE ELEVATIONS 1 J Z-201 & Z-202 4 11 11==11 1 1 1 L 1 CONTRACTOR -A i | TBD 1 1 1 2% 1 if 1 DEMO- L- / k -3 1 DEMO - 'Ir 1 1 DATE OF PUBLICATION 1 LAUNDRY/MUDROO'~ 1 E- 1 ~ . ~~ ---- --GARMRE_ ___. | DEMO--4 -!. 1 0 11 1 1 ~ F.--I 11 1 I / 4/1 1 1 1 , SD 6/30/14 HPC CONCEPT. REV. 1 1 11 ,n -- -- 4[1-4 ~ 114 - PROJECT NO: 1411 0 1- 0 DRAWN BY: KPT [ 1 1 COPYRIGHT FORUM PHI LLC | COMM<N | I CtMM'bN WALL LEGEND , BUILDING , I BWILDING 1 1 11 1 L.J EXISTING WALL TO REMAIN | 1 1 RE-SIDED ~ NEW WALL A 63 00 -Tz=r - O SHEET TITLE 01 + 4 4 rl WALLTO DEMO PROPOSED MAIN LEVEL 3/16"= 1-0 EXISTING MAIN LEVEL 3/16" = 1 '-0 Z-102 9-En Im FLOOR PLANS N 148 16 \Jj PROPERTY LINE PROPERTY LINE FORUM PHI U 201 9 VU" 9 0 f Â® SETBACk LINE SETBACK LINE 715 West Main Street, Suite 204 11 Aspen, Colorado 81611 1 1 li I P 970 279 4157 F 866 770 5585 il ' 1 1 1 _ ' ~_- 101 E HALLAM 1 1 11 1 HALLAM LLC 101 E Hallam St O-- ~ e CH~443' ] Aspen, Colorado 81611 1 - 1 1 1 , .i--01 I < CLOSET ' 1 1 lili BEDROOM 1 11 1 - - i 1 1,7-== f ' 1<- 1 /7 K 1 1 r--t rjL SHOWERJ 'l Il \ A h ,~-~~:~ / BATH .% 0% EJ 1 l A Q 2 f I .1=122*1-12 LE=-t CONSULTANTS 11 J . SURVEYOR ~ SHOWER I ~C 1 U BRJ' 11 Aspen Survey Engineers, Inc. 210 S Galena Street Aspen. Colorado 81611 (970) 925-3816 b# mrve.ors@gmai~ com 1 \ 1/ 1 1 1 CIVIL 1 1 TBD - Â«i) (1Â»- --:- 1 \ ---4 -1- ---- Â«D h----- 1 1 1 / CLOSET tt ASTER BA-H el 41 1 11 i 2X ) Â·UEi7 MECHANICAL V ~ /,r__1 V TBD 1 --11 1Â«3 1>-- --i- ---------k-- >>Â»45; ------ Â«~~ 1 NORTH OF LINE IS | ~Â· STRUCTURAL ' CLOSET EXISTING TO REMAIN 1 11 TBD - SEE ELEVATIONS - Z-201 &Z-202 ' <33-~ ~TBD 11 1 . 1 1 CONTRACTOR 1 1 | |0 0--* r 1 411ASTER BEDROOM 1 ~<~ ~ -977-ra 7 2.2014 DATE OF PUBLICATION $ 11 \L- 1.-1 1 1 -1, 1 L DE'.0 1 -- --- --(0- " 11 1 1 li 1 ROOF DECK 1 , 1 , 1, 11 14 1 1, 11 1 1 SD 6/30/14 HPC CONCEPT. REV. 11" 1 11 1 1 1, I li PROJECT NO: 1411 DRAWN BY. KPT 1 1 1 1 1 - ' ' ' ~ ' COPYRIGHT FORUM PHI. LLC I I I I I 1 ~ ~- WALL LEGEND , 1 1 , 1 1 1 1 ~ EXISTING WALL TO REMAIN ~ ~ ~ ~ 1 1 1 1 |~1 EXISTING WAUTO BE 1__1 RE-SIDED , , ~ ~ NEWWALL 1 ~1 Â© 0 0 0 6 6021 SHEETTITLE 1 Ii-2021 ~ ~ F1 : 1 1 WALL TO DEMO : L-1 i PROPOSED UPPER LEVEL 3/16" = 1'-0" EXISTING UPPER LEVEL 3/16" = 1'-0" Z-103 1[lf---1 Im FLOOR PLANS N 148 16 U./ PROPERTY LINE PROPERTY LINE FORUM PHI Uj W 2-201 T O O U -' --201 G T AAN) V SETEACP LINE SETBACK LINE 715 West Main Street, Suite 204 , â€¢ Aspen. Colorado 81611 1 1 PÂ· 970279 4157 F 866 770 5585 EXISTING FLAT ROOF F SLOPED FOR DRAINAGE 1 1 101 E HALLAM i HALLAM LLC 101 E Hallam St ''' O (D- ' 8 Aspen, Colorado 81611 115131 [EGI- -{i7512 mi-ii~_ litik -Eifil EXISTING FOOF 12.12 I 1 TOREMAIN 12 12 12 12 11 U Â» 0 29 '1221 1 1 j ~ CONSULTANTS lia] ./,I [24 i 43 ./. Â®4 SURVEYOR ~ Aspen, Colorado 81611 Aspen Survey Engineers. Inc. 210 S Galena Street (970) 925-3816 aspensurveyors@gmail com 1 CIVIL -- 2--------------------1----- Â«i) 3,-I---0 TBD 1 1 41212L 412'2 L i L.-4 1212 -2, A </itir 1 2 202 UET/ .3.. .-3617 MECHANICAL -11 -LI TBD V V 0 0 1 0 NORTH OF LINE IS | STRUCTURAL EXISTING TO REMAIN 1 1 TBO SEE ELEVATIONS I Z-201&Z-202 LINE OF - I I * DEMO CONTRACTOR UPPER LEVEL Â·Â·Â·83] REFI- , I TBD 8 ---------- T 6 0 - 1 1 0 1 U NEW FLAT ROOF i 1 SLOPED FOR IRAINAGE DEMO--J DEMO----1 1 7 2/014 DATE OF PUBLICATION 'EE] 1 0- 0 0- 1 0 L_ ~o~F DECK SLOID 1 FOR DRAINAGE NEW ROOF DECK E- SLOPED FOR DRA]NAGE SD 6/30/14 HI'C CONCEPT. REV. EXISTING ROOF E- TO REMAIN PROJECT NO: 1411 (31-- - - - - --I - Â«3) DRAWN BY: KPT 41212 ' COPYRIGHT FORUM PHI. LLC 1 .1 ROOF LEGEND ' ' fril~ . b 1 ~ EXISTING ROOF TO REMAIN ' ~_] NEW METAL ROOF | 1 11 1 |__~ NEW ROOF DECK SHEET TITLE 0 0.44 8 0 0 00 4.4 16 ~~| ROOF TO DEMO PROPOSED ROOF PLAN 3/16" = 1'-0 EXISTING ROOF PLAN 3/16" = 1'-0 Z-104 ELRI--1 N ROOF PLAN 148 9 <> f FORUM PHI T 3 9 T T T Tr ff F SETBACKLINE@ SOUTH ELEV PROPERTY LINE @ | | R-6 HEIGHT LIMIT PROPERTY LINE @ .1 ' PROPERTY LINE @ 25 FEET NORTH ELEV NORTH ELEV =KINE @ !1 1 1 1 &1~ 1 1 _SETBACK LINE @ SETBACK LINE @ 715 West Main Street. Suite 204 b ETELEi --------- -7- jRIDGE ---'~ | | Ut RIDGE III 1 16 HEIGHT LIMIT Aspen, Colorado 81611 1 .. 1 -- - _,6- __ _ EAST ELEV NORTH ELEV ----- -L 1 -_81 1 1 I | SEEWEST ELEV I 25 FEET P 970 279 4157 F 866 770 5585 SICCI Z-202 FOR SHEET/Â·202 FOR , I HEIGHT 9 , 4,|10 1 1 1 13. 1/3 POINT FROM ~ HEIGHT ='/4-Â»..O RIDGE _ -1 1/3 POINT FROM-9// 1/3 POINT FROM ~ 1/3 POINT FROM A)/\1, 5 %11 1 x ~ ':et 1~ 4-1[ 1 Ia- i 1/3 POINT FROM -| EAVE TO RIDGE / / EAVE TO RIDGE EAVE TO RIDGE 1 1 '\~* EAVE TO RIDGE 11 11 1 1 1 17 ~*EAVE _10 poINT FROM | | | I EAVE TO RIDGE HALLAM LLC \\\49 4 I la POINT FROM 101 E HALLAM EAIETO RIOGE 1~3POINTFROM ~ 1Â« -1 | | | EAVETORIDGE 1 , EAVE TO RIDGE 101 E Hallam St I 1 /3 POINT FROM 4---1-- - - - - - --- -- i - - -[ - -a-- 1 TOP MOST PORTIO~' i i Aspen. Colorado 81611 .iRIDGE '1 TOP MOST PORTION _1 1 lit 56 / 1Â»111~ 1 - OF STRUCTURE .- --- . [~------OF STRUCTURE FLAT ROOF SLOPED | FOR DRAINAGE 2 64 **EAVE| 1'3 POINT FROM If? I I 6 6 1. E-FOR DRAINAGE TOP MOST PORTION EAVE TO RIDGE 1// \\1 ' EAVE TO â€¢ ~ OF STRUCTURE \ U \91 RIDGE | I 1 - 11 1 2 1 V 4 49 Ir-1 1 ill 1 1 1 11 1 11 1 9 i l l 1 1 F 1 1 11 1 11 1 1 1 1 1 lili 11 1 CONSULTANTS SURVEYOR Aspen Survey Engineers, Inc 210 S Galena Street Aspen. Colorado 81611 (970) 925-3816 aspensurveyors@gmail com CIVIL TBD MECHANICAL TBO EXISTING EAST ELEVATION 3/16" = 1'-0" 1X EXISTING NORTH ELEVATION 3/16" = 1'-0 STRUCTURAL f f C) LINE<-TION -1 1 T 19 .i, SOUTH ELEI TBD & RENOVATJON EXITING C?*UNEÂ¥ 9 I SETBACK LINE @ 1 PROJECTION TO REMAIN --m 1 PROPERTY LINE @_ 1| | | PROPOSED ,| | PER 26 575 020 FIA ~ | R.6 HEIGHT LIMIT PROPERTY LINE. _ _L _________ _1___________4-__F 1 PROPERTY LINE @ ADDIDTJON & IEXISTING TO , NORTH ELEV NORTH ELEV EAST ELEV ~1 ~ ~ 4- EXTER,OR | 1 REMAIN 4 3 FEET SETBACK LINE @ RENOVATION h SETBACK LINE @ SETBACK LINE @ EAST ELEV ' - - _ - - _* _ _ _ .C EAST ELEV NORTH ELEV--------- CONTRACTOR 1 1 ~RIDGE 1 1 ~ RIDGEE ; R-6 HEiGHT lIMIT 1 25 FEET TBD *=W EDJ 11 1 9 49<31[10. 1 | SHEETZ-202FOR 81 1[CT 2-202 FOR SEE WEST ELEV ~7251&SEAM ~ HEIGHT HEIGHT 13 TOP MOST PORTION _ 1 | ROOF || ~---=._-Da OF=STRUCTURE 1 1 1/3 POINT FROM _ 12,i / 1/3 POINT FROMP/2 I 1/3 POINT FROM 1 5 37 | 1/3 POINT FROM PROPOSED HORIZONTAL 6- D 12. i EAVETO RIDGE /~/' EAVE TO RIDGE -NXE EAVETO RIDGE ~ "272/1 1 ' EAVE TO RIDGE \ 7/ STAINEDCEDAR ~| 11. || TOP MOST PORTION ......................... ~ jl ':| ~<*EAVE ...1,3 POINT FROM | 1 1 I 1/3 POINT FROM 7'29014 DATE OF PUBUCATION EAVE TO RIDGE , OF STRUCTURE EAVE TO RIDGE 1/3 POINT FROM ] EAVETORIDGE I FY, 'f]Ilin 1 1/3 POINT FROM R-FDECKSLOPED EXISTING CEDAR It I 'm RIC]GEE |~ FOR DRAINAGE ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ SHINGLE A RIDGE j 1 1 1 1 1 i=9=111'h-3--r TOP MOST FORTI. FLAT ROOF SLOPED | | | [T---OFSTRUCTURE FOR DRAINAGE 1 LUUILJ. EXISTING CEDAR 1/3 POINT FROM | , U OFSTRUCTURE I ty d 8 ( 3 ul.1 1 ~-- FOR DRAINAGE TOP MOST PORTION i ~ 4 EAVE TO RIDGE J // " fr EAVE TO ~ll RIDGE 1/ 1 1 2-1 - 4 -- --- 1 1 N i: 4 11 FACADE i FICADE SD 6/30/14 HFC CONCEPT REV. 11=11 - 'r> EXISTING BRICK , EXISTING BRICK 11 I. |- 1 1 11 1 PROJECT NO: 1411 ' 1 ' DRAWN BY: KPT 1 1 1 11 1 It 1 EXISTING HISTORIC FRONT EXISTING STF EET-ORIENTED COPYRIGHT FORUM PHI. LLC | | PER Z-003|IDS Dl B PER ZÂ·003 ICS /38 ' | L PORCH T*REI~AIN I- PRINCIPAL WIN DOW TO REMAfN 1 1 1 11 1 111 11 1 EXISTINGSTREETÂ·OMIENTED 1 1 11 1 | 4 - 6Â·-8- ENTRANCE~ TO lEMAIN I PER '-003 RDS /1 I 1 1 1 11 1 1 1 1 1 11 1 , 11 l l 1 1 11 1 %11 11 1 1 1 11 1 9 11 1 1 - 1 1 1 ~1 1 1 ~ 1 1 1 1 SHEET TITLE 1 1 1 ,, 1 I till I Z-201 ELEVATIONS PROPOSED EAST ELEVATION 3/16" = 1'-0" 1 PROPOSED NORTH ELEVATION 3/16" = 1'-0" HEIGHTS FORUM PHI T itt? T ~ SETBACK LINE @ I 9 77 9 7 1 SET-CKLINE@ i ./ST Elli , SOUTH ELEV ' PROPERTY LINE @ PROPERTY LINE @ 1 | | | | '| 4 PROPERTY LINE @ 1/3 POINT FROM | | | | 5 vÂ£ST ELEV SOUTH ELEV -1 1 1 ~ EAVE TO RIDGE ~ |~ ~~~ SOU TH ELEV SETBACK LINE @ _- , SETBACK LINE @ , - - __ 1- - - i 715 West Main Street. Suite 204 WEST ELEV _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ I RIDGE 1 1 1 I 1 1 R-6 HEIGHT LIMIT S tHELEV -,---- ~ ~~-7-] 1~RIDGE I ' R. HEIGHT LIMIT Aspen. Colorado 81611 25 FEET 1/3 POINT FROM 5. ~ 6. 10 POINT FROM | 1 12 | SEE WEST ELEV | ~,/~~4 I 12 ,/ 25 FEET P 970.279.4157 F: 866 770.5585 3 4~VETOR~E~-~EAâ„¢'r ' SHEET ZÂ·202 ' ' | 1/3 POINT FROM 1/3 POINT FROM 1,3 Pol N T FROM 1/3 POINT FROM | 1 1 FOR HEIGHT w 13. EAVE TO RIDGE EAVE TO RIDGE ~ EAVE TO RIDGE ~ - - -131'Lu-- EAVE TO RIDGE 1/3 POINT FROM 7. 8 ' EAVE TO RIDGE 4 -19 1 1 1 1 1 1/POINTFROM 121 / - <'12 // '4. - . ,!2 1/3 POINT FROM i I 10 POINT FROM | 12#-8/ 4 L_1 1.17 111~ EAVE' 101 E HALLAM EAVE TO RIDGE 1 / \ \FEAVE To RIDGE EAVE TO RtDGE HALLAM LLC -tri~ 4 e ' 1/3 POINT FROM 1 101 E Hallam St EAvE TO Â»109 1 7--|AX I 1 Aspen. Colorado 81611 TOP MOST PORTION L 1/3 POINT FROM i i 7 2 L 1-7 jj ~RIDGE I OFSTRUCTURE 1 | EAVETORIDGE | 1 -1 -LIUE-iffl 1 -1111132,~1~ PORT~ON | OF STRUCTURE FLATROOFSLOPED u w -Â·1'71744 . ,___~411<leSTRUCTURE -/ li TOP MOST PORTION . I FOR DRAINAGE - A 1 | ~ 'O POINT FROM 15// \\le. 1/3 POINTFROM FLAT ROOF SLOPE' i ~-- EAVE TO RIDGE EAVE TO RIDGE EAVE TO RIDGE FOR DRAINAGE 1- I < 3,iM}f#] 44JFA~ir)I-- _- 1%~-16_,4- __ '_NT__RT _ 9 -01Â» 2 1 1 -1 r a e 6 E-Â§7 - â€¢E E | 1 un} _ 1,1.-lili..2 1 1 111 1 1 LL ., 2 - 0 : 1 1 11 6 I; 1 h 2, 11 111 4.1.- 1 1 1 11 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 p ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~~ ~~ ~ CONSULTANTS SURVEYOR Aspen Survey Engineers, Inc 210 S Galena Street Aspen, Colorado 81611 (970) 925-3816 aspensurveyors@gmail com CIVIL TBD MECHANICAL TBD 4X EXISTING WEST ELEVATION 3/16" = 1'+07 3X EXISTING SOUTH ELEVATION 3/16" = 1'-0" STRUCTURAL 1 9 T 9 9 f T f ff f Y TBD SETBACK LINE @ i LINE OF ADDITION WEST ELEV SOUTH ELEV | b RENOVATION | | _PROPERTY LINE @ PROPERTI LINE @_p | | | | | PROPERTY LINE @ 1 1 11 PROPOSED WEST ELEV SOUTH ELEV ~- SOUTH ELEV SETBACK LINE @ 1 + EXISTING TO ADDIDTION 8 -~ SETBACKLINE @ WEST ELEV 1 REMAIN .i. EXTERIOR SOUTH ELEV ~ CONTRACTOR 7 ---- - 1 1 1 ~ RIDGE I RENOVATION I I ~ R-6 HEIGHT LIMIT 1 XiI 1 1 1 1 1~ R-6 HEIGHT LIMIT 25 FEET 25 FEET TBD 1/3 POINT FROM _ 5. /'. \ 6 _ 1/3 POINT FROM | | SEE WEST ELEV | EAVE TO RIDGE _n/6 \ 1~4 EAVE TO RIDGE SHEET Z-202 PROPOSED ~ 1/3 POINT FROM - 901 34 PROPOSED 1 1 HORIZONTAL 6- 1 1 1 PROPOSED FOR HEIGHT STANDING SEAM 1/3 POINTFROM .;Â·r~~i-,1.,r NEAM EXISTING CEDAR ~ EAVE TO RIDGE ~ - EAVE TO RIDGE | ROOF 1/3 POINT FROM 3_ 79 1 1 ROOF SHINGLE , EAVETO RIDGE PROPOSED 1 3 4 1 1,&041,2 1/3 POINT FROM I -HORIZONTAL 6 1 i'F' | ~ 1 STAINED CEDAR 1 /3 POINT FROM 12F' . .7, .5. EAVE TO RIDGE 1 / -EAVE TO RIDGE | EAVE TO RIDGE . 7/2/2014 DATE OF PUBUCATION /: i , 7/.\ 1/3 POINT FROM ~ ~ ~ | - 4 ~ bl EXSTING CEDAR I -r - -1.- 7 f 3---- STAINED CEDAR 1 /3 POINT PROMVI 8 1 EAVE TO RIDGE SHAKE I " 4 | 18 POINT FROM 1 1 EAVE TO RIDGE l TOP MOST PORTION 1/3 POINT FROM 1 1 1 -JRIDGE 1 OF STRUCTURE ir-71 EAVE TO RIDGE OFSTRUCTURE 1 11 1 -1 La E I .3 POINT FROM TOP MOST PORTION FLAT ROOF SLOPED * . ____20Â»>El:JIÂ«Irt 1 1 EAVE TO RIDGE FOR DRAINAGE - 1/3 POINT FROM FLAT ROOF SLOPED 1 1 16. 14- ---Â·Â·Â·Â·-Â·Â· 4lk'OF STRUCTURE .~ - - 2 2 4 ~ ~ EAVE TO RIDGE ' ' FOR DRAINAGE --- U, 2,= 2 1 T14 I 1 1 - - - -1- T - - -' -- + - 5/ 73 11% 9 2 r 1 - 1 ' I. 1 1 1 116 111 1 6 1 1 111 . 11 EXISTING BRICK SD 6/30/14 HPC CONCEPT REV FACADE I ~imilit= I ~ p PROJECT NO: 1411 1 I R+ M I 11 9 '-1 I a ./ k 1 2. 1 1 1 I Illl~Il,HII PWUW, I 1 11 1 _ ~ ~ ' DRAWN BY: KPT L EXISTING STREETÂ·ORIENTED EXISTING STREET ORIENTED 8/ 3 ..1 1 1 11 I COPYRIGHT FORUM PHI, LLC PRINCIPAL WINDCAAS TO REMAIN L- 6'-r ENTRAMDE TO REMAIN GARAGE ~, PER Z-003 RDS O3B PER Z-003 ICS D 1 PER Z-003 RDS C 1 1 1 1 1 1 11 1 1 1 lilli 1 | 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 SHEET TITLE 1 1 1 1 1 1 lili 1 Z-202 ELEVATIONS 4 PROPOSED WEST ELEVATION 3/16" = 1'-0" 3 PROPOSED SOUTH ELEVATION 3/16" = 1'-0" HEIGHTS PROPERTY LINE PROPERTY LINE FORUM PHI O 01â‚¬> te OV-'00 SETEACR LINE SETBACK LINE 715 West Main Street Suite 204 i Aspen, Colorado 81611 1 1 P 970 279 4157 F 866 770 5585 I EXISTING FLAT ROOF FLOPED FOR DRAINAGE 1 , 101 E HALLAM L 91-9 i HALLAM LLC ' 101 E Hallam St â‚¬>- ' 8 â‚¬)- -- O Aspen, Colorado 81611 2. 11 2. 11 15'Â· 'Â· -9 Ii- 15'-| I 15'- .4.--0 ~- 15 1,/ -FGs-1 Fa-61- ' FFU}* 16 5 4 1 -Eal 2. 1 7~1 2 3.4 -{WiT31 1 4 -{ 761 EXISTING ROOF 412 qi r TO REMAIN LU) 4. r'1212r 1.4 4-1 0/7-1 16 -t . F TO RD AIN I EXISTI,G CHIMNEY 1-7 r-18'- C Â·, 18'-1 0 . 1 ..... ----- -~ 5. , II U H1 0 [fijid E 5 /11 110. lEil' 1 1 1 , CONSULTANTS <//8 6 r~ 6. 9. 175731-, , , , Aspen Survey Engineers, Inc 18Â·1{ 1 SURVEYOR 18-11 9.1 210 S Galena Street Aspen. Colorado 81611 r 1 (970) 925-3816 aspensulveyors@gmail.com 1 CIVIL â‚¬Â»- 1 0 16':I,4.1.n TBD 1 1 4.--1 7 1212 ' 7 42-0 ' 1 16 :. + n 8. r[77. /h ,-542 ./.h U-'ll .E,7 .'ll/ 8 r41212M 1 T..i MECHANICAL v 16Â·Â·! '- 17 V te . 4- tdyk V TBD 1 1 â‚¬)- 1 1 ---- -qi) el-.- .-------- ---=----- ---1-----~-Iic, 1 | - - | ~ - - - -141RTH oF Lit - , | STRUCTURAL i EXISTING TO i 1 TBD SEE ELEVATK 2-201 & Z-202 18 -4- 7 1 LINE OF _~ 12. 13. i , DEMO CONTRACTOR ' UPPER LEVEL TBD 0 1 8 L NEW FLAT RooF SLIPED FOR ORAINAGE DEMO --1 | | DEMO - 1 1 7'22014 DATE OF PUBLICATION 20'-1- J L_-_________.4- 14.9Â·-5 ~7 | 13 LtiZE] 1 1 1 0 0- 1 6 U ROOF DECK SLOID 1 FOR DRA)IKE ~ NEW ROOF DECK , F SLOPED FOR DRAINAM 1 1 14 5 , SD 6/30/14 HPC CONCEPT. REV. 9-51,0. I EXISTING ROOF ~ TO REMAIN PRCUECT NO: 1411 DRAWN BY: KPT 9Â·-0 v- ..1 7111 15. lEE] ~ COPYRIGHT FORUM PHI. LLC 9-0 34..11 - _1__ _---- 16 r--m , 16 r- i 01212I 11132111 ~ 9'-0.-110---~~~~~~1 1 11 1 1 O 000 0 0 0 00 U-2021 SHEET TITLE PROPOSED ROOF TOPOGRAPHY 3/16 1'-0" EXISTING ROOF TOPOGRAPHY 3/16" = 1'-0" Z-203 U]-1 1 N HEIGHTS OVER 148 16 ~ TOPOGRAPHY FORUM PHI 715 West Main Street. Suite 204 Aspen. Colorado 81611 P. 970.279.4157 F 866 770 5585 101 E HALLAM HALLAM LLC 101 E Hallam St Aspen. Colorado 81611 4 4.64 Â»2.*992*4 E I./1 ff/-4./Â¥ ='Â·ts:3528, 4- 1% 1 -. I. ' V . \ N 4 I J / //1 +Vid , I~~ CONSULTANTS V- 1 SURVEYOR i V. 0 --1 1 J ~4 1 95 _~ - 210 S Galena Street Aspen Sur,ey Engineers, Inc. 74 (970) 925-3816 C3[1~ 4 ' '~ <4 . v" -30,~ M#4* , CIVIL aspensurveyors@gmail.com Â¢62EFXM . 1 . TBD 7 *90507 \ i 4.1 J .. - - MECHANICAL --11 - I 1#fllE-i Tf.[Afmiili~Elilii_%i-7[Amff'*IllfR3*11---~-+P-1---- ~ ~ TBD F STRUCTURAL TBD 1 1 - i...2.... CONTRACTOR TBD PROPOSED WEST FACADE REV PROPOSED SOUTH FACADE REV Ceh:afy\31 7,2/2014 DATE OF PUBLICATION m , / 990, 1 k V~- w UÂ» %11 v -. 1 J-CD, /11/ 1 ty,F-DI.v 91 4 P 17 1 AK,â€¢â‚¬,P , I. .evwq ' Mul,%.4/ 3% 1 1% . â€¢ VEL , C. '9*.--m19- ./ ~ ~ ir \1 14 -Na T.ZRE.:30,6/1/0 4, -4.-, .- ---. --, 4 1 4.54-* A:Â· FIR-11,Vrdlit h i SD 6/30/14 HPC CONCEPT, REV. vt,~ ILS'/gr,01 71,$159*46)14%#19'fr'#FiA LV /9,/934-~10;Â· lic"24 V 4 4 DRAWN BY: KPT 11~ - e . PROJECT NO. 1411 =Pykrs>n:fl 1 441 W"*WH#LER+- -- COPYRIGHT FORUM PHI, LLC - --1 4 - --- ---- - Â· 3Â» Â·- -Wi TEiE@ 4Â»-3~111 3 T.I./..... - 4 - - -1---3~929#21 *2*42% N MI j i il - -- -7.-Â· - aft W \ d Mt -7.1 6.-- 1 111Immilll 1 1 SHEET TITLE Z-204 - -- -- -- -- - PROPOSED PROPOSED EAST FACADE PROPOSED NORTH FACADE REV FACADES .. I. ... 1 I , 0 , * I % Lip , r, :,0. ~: '.11*it , 19 ': 4-le'' ....., 4 A. - ./..... ; P ./ ./ I ' Mi~e ./. 1 / *, AL .. $3 ,f I.* * ,re'-~~Â· F *1 F Â·/Â· , ,.. . 1 M 42 62# 9 4~ . ' 7. r. I R I . .. 4,9 f 1 491.1 Y ... 1 , ..6 4 '' Â·y . *. . , 2, Â» 1 -:A *,2. I f'. t. . f 1 0 A//F - , P 4 9 I 1 \U, it 4 C F..t K 4 . +119 ./. 1,- '. 0 . - . 0- . , I . i ... 1 -. .- I.- . . ... Asm' Â· *4,~Â·:*:.ht,1.~i.F., 1 'k./1.'. . 4 , 'tfÂ· h 4 't~ "4 40. 1 .â€¢1 . ~ Â».4. 19#F-:IP . Â·. 4 '414*jÂ¢yl . 4. il, , I.'r. .2 ' . (127:..;-Â¢Â·<:*- - 4. AM*,Mar U# .94"06'444 Jj-Â·3~"tg#-I''Â·p-1.0,"Pf.r f.kl;449':, ~~...1~%03= 4,1--4.--tillg Â£0* WÂ·.'. ' ~ Â·'~2~1 ~Ii.,-~..:'44~~74*,VfD 2.-/ 4 _* 4.- 1 ~ ~~'~Â· ' u 0 Â·tfÂ· 02Â·s.p,%1,)+~4' s h, 1 51-..- 4.. M~&-68 %:...EVK#*TR 4 --9 +F/:/14 el. 1 :5 ' '4---W.. 41'Â·6 Â·11'41'Â·' '-~'~' **' Â·s.92#340#ALL C 4F ! Â·Â·- '4 - 1 .2 !.4 'F*i c '17>1 ,+fiET:WI~~y; 4 1 2 z Â· fi~ L.ve . .1 ./07/ * 'f I.- . - .-m ..f. - 87:y 9%. I. 7. E; Im-4.d-i---*WrA Y f ii i0* dih AW /1 â„¢R - 2- ~ j 0 : i , , I-- I./FR A 0 1 *Â«- - ~4 - a - 7 ////~~~1~~/7 - Â· 8 rul m - - ~ . 1,11 1 J. 14@. 1. 4 6.11 '". -9 -"* ---- 44& 1Â· â€¢iIi' '' .Â« ii .1.; Â§2'tÂ¢~ ~tif ,t, /,â€¢ ,?.: .r- ../ 1Â·-..1 41 Â·,ttltitbi t"r.,2: i i?: br: i , - ./.443*5*01.1,9:rill/fi 1 1-.< A tz= ~. p .1&. /.4- . . - *n*:-. ...:. -r e . . - . 1 - - 1 1 - . . . 11.- I ,- 1 I. , ,,. tt ..1. 4 1 t ...5 ' ' I ' . 4 i' /. . 9 k.'f '/.. .,Â·. - I -- - ' Ff 1 t#.24/ .Â¥:el â‚¬72.., . u. i - & 44.44 4, - 4 & I I. I * tr . 1 ... .4.9.7/12:~ivmeL. W&,EL,<28**AL,& :424.Z,imilill.-i-if./1&,e~Vft.4- ret . ..:- bÂ¥' -' 'I 4 1 J... I .,5 P,vtÂ· .' .- : 2 -E -I'l ' .1 - . 21 + - P .*:545*er-Â·f. ' j 4- - .'Â·4-* t,+ . '24*.,>Â»F> . 44 ... ::-7.....dfu . -~ .tr...<r;4'. '.tÂ¢/ 1,7 Tr. ./.- 1/ I ' /8 .. ile 4/M/9*2140/K.Ke'. *.... 46 9..il. 07.jee Â·Â·.-c' " / 21': .. .W -J ..1, - - . h 117 .~ ,-. . U. .- a . 4. 1 -t i -. 'Fl, --. <~2 - ..f: L..2 -7, - .1 : I - - .1 : - - : . 0 - .. SHEET INDEX r i. r. 2 C"R COVER LAND USE APPROVALS t LAND USE APPROVALS LAND USE APPROVALS : SURVEY ZOOP ZONI NG SUMMAR 2 1.9~'ANJAUDG*WWkÂ·,1-,2106 002 RDS z. COMPLIANCE 2-003 SiTE PLAN 715 West Mairi Street. Suite 204 Z-004 FLOOR AREA CALCULATIONS Aspen: Colorado 8161 1 P 970.279.4157 F 866 770 5585 ZÂ·005 FLOOR AREA CALCULATIONS 2.-OOS FLOOR AREA CALCULATIONS Z 101 FLOOR PLANS Z 102 FLOOR PLANS 101 E HALLAM 2 103 FLOOR PLANS HALLAM LLC ZÂ·104 ROOFÂ· PLAN 101 E Hallam St Z 201 ELEVATIONS HEIGHTS Aspen, Colorado 81611 : -i mâ€¢.A-rv-+Â·r ' 1.Ii-,L_}-re 2..02. r......i i...0 noei Â·:Â·. Z 203 HEIGHTS OVER TOPOGRAPHY 2 204 PROPOSED FACADES 2 205 STREETSCAPE 31 14 ..7 1&#. 1 1-rx;,2 L F - 3 17# r: i jin:(.:pr. - ~~1~~- .< 4. 6 4 \. /3 CONSULTANTS 4 4 r %Â©- Â£ P . SURVEYOR ---r~ Â· I .4 4 ' ''hlk< 1 1~ 1 e F.. 11 31*2 A , f,- . . ~ *. f k'Mit, , L Â·Â»,. . . Aspen, Colorado 8'611 <2,4* I G.&2 4,/ 4 410. r, 't 44' 210 S Gaiona Street ' 2.013 1- 33, . . 1. 04;~f ..f ..4*Â·*': >,* .A 3~ '4 f, '14:~--Â» - f - uspf.7 C .r.k .1~rÂ© t -2 4- 1 4 / f Aspen Survey-En{J~Tied-m. 2 4 Â»t ' C>''Ii-5 /12412â‚¬ MA:*.7. i. '. - %-7'T jti . U i/ Â·' 1~ Z K 4 . ..1 . A Â» a....Surle:Of:*g Y.i!.Com 7 F 14 1 1.- 0 *-'~0&~/LOU (970) 925-3816 , +:44 - 3Â»lk ~4 j 9 4~~A<~<~~~ 1 0!VIL Â» ' 9 . ;%i. 14 /4* . 1~ .) 14 , IE , 1% ur Â· 1 - 1 , 1 2 h \. , $6'.3 Â· "'-' '9~ 4 , 12< i Â·. a 4 tw,1 t *Â· TBD . I Â« 4 , 4 8,ir :*. , 1. Â· ' , 4( 4 . ' ' i PLÂ· i. i 2 t /4 .. r Â£ Â¢1/4 407 le , ff'849.49>Â· i... /0,%/0.KI'N Ti 44 Â«9 10Â»1 /. MECHANICAL 1% P ' f I 71Â¥â‚¬2.49 0 - 1, 16 + . -Â·-. Fili we-*.* i: Â· 1 2,j~'~'..1 1~ 140â€ž44 4. 1 r *yu I '.14 ..... STRUCTURAL 11< a -1 -0./..r .4 4 Â·-- f . Â·VI 2, I . , f .i :gil I * * :... - ]41 .Â£1 - D 1 9 , .2 i 'lt . I /4 W...4 * Ili 'Â· - ~â‚¬ Â·" ~ ~ Â·'*~'~Â· Â· '/ ,izzu ~~ idÂ¥. I. 7-~.15 : ' 5 . . i r . 4."9Â¥fp , .1 .Â·:2<:* V ~ '1: Me~ ..31f 1/ ~ hiT ';;~ TBD i ( M - ~1441 'Â· Â· fÂ» Â·' "- ... ibitli CONTRACTOR N 9 '3 41 k I I: 11 i 1 ;i 1 - :Â·~ Â·.~ j 1 ... i . il:1' ..a L 6 I - d Â· 9,23/231Â·Â· DATE 2. P/ill/ON -2774 : . , 1 '. <Â· -*%42 8 1 -1 0,1 r . % 2 -L I ./11 1 1: 111 & 4 1 01" 11 j I I lili 1 - 1 111 .*Ill 1,/4 1 --- ....I-1-4t-*61 -11'1Â£ "42 Al f '* 9 1 -- .i Ill"h ililit~uu "'Ill'1*1611.. 4.---6. =E rzrzsrEZÂ· >/ Se , 4 : â€¢ 14 ~ HPL .LUNCEPT RIV PROJECT NO. 1411 DRAWN BY. KPT COPYRIGHT FORUM PHI. LLC SCOPE OF WORK The remodel of the main and upper nor- historic levels of a landmarked historic residence and addli On of a subgrade basement level and garage wrth roof deck 101 E HALLAM SHEET TITL E 101 E Hallam Street, Aspen, Colorado, 81611 Z-CVR HPC CONCEPTUAL REVIEW COVER E- t....T' . f. N.6 , C .WU Â« i '4. 1 I i ss, Â·: i'#-Â· '.: Â·: b ." ? ES{53.9-*33! -- -, %. b 0,51 . ..AÂ»,Â»a~,0. Â· ,4;Â·Ab i .Â·,EÂ·Â·I 715 West Main Street. Suite 204 Aspen, Colorado 81611 P. 970.279.4157 F: 866 770 5565 101 E HALLAM HALLAM LLC 101 E Hallam St Aspen, Colorado 81611 CONSULTANTS SURVEYOR AspenÂ·.Â· :, y Engineers ific 210 S G.VId Stleel Aspen Colorado 81611 (970) 925-3816 aspensurveyors@gl:il.coin CIVIL TBD MECHANICAL TBD RESOLUTION NO.Q~. Series of 1998 SncU.ga_2. Conditions upon Which Variance is Granted. 3. The grant of variance will be generally conaigtant with A RESOLUTION oF THE BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT OF THE CITY OF ASPEN the purposes, goals. objectives, and policiee of the The variance granted by Section 2, above, ia specifically GRANTING A VARIANCE WITH CONDITIONS IN CASE NUMBER 98-3 Aspen Area Camprehensive Plan and Chapter 24 of the conditioned upon and subject to the following conditions: RELATING TO PROPERTIES IN THE CITY OF ASPEN WITH STREET ADDRESSES Aspen Municipal Code. STRUCTURAL 1. No balcony or similar improvement shall be permitted TBD OF 101 EAST HALLAM STREET AND 105 EAST HALLAM STREET, ASPEN. COLORADO AMID LEGAL DESCRIPTIONS OF LOT A AND THE WESTERLY 4. The grant of variance in the minimum variance that within the east aide yard setback. 4.96 FEET OF LOT B. BLOCK 65; AND THE EAST 25.14 FEET OF LOT B AND will make posgible the reaeonable uae of the parcel, THE WEST B FEET OF LOT C. BLOCK 65, CITY AND TOWNSITE OF ASPEN, building or structure. 2. Unleam vested ae part of a development plan purouant to Section 24-6-207 of the Aspen Municipal Code, the variance granted 5. The literal interpretation and enforcement of the herein shall automatically expire after twelve (12) months from CONTRACTOR WHEREAS, Mr. Donald Krumm and Mr. Alan Bush have made the date of approval unlesâ€¢ development has bien commenced as terms of Chapter 24 of the Aspen Municipal Code TBD would deprive the applicant of rights eammonly enjoyed evidenced by the issuance of a building permit, or an extension application, dated April 1, 1998 to the Board of Adjustment for a by other parcele in the game zone district, and would granted by the Board in which can the variance ehall expire at variance from the dimensional requirements of Chapter 24 of the cause the applicant unnece=0ary hardship or practical the end of the extension. difficulty. In determining that the applicantle rights Aspen Municipal Code, and would be deprived absent a variance, the Board 3. Applicant shall, prior to filing an application for a building permit, cause to be recorded with the Clerk and 0 21201+ DATE Or PJECCATION considered certain special conditione and circum- WHEREAS. this matter came on for hearing before the Board of stances which are unique to the parcel, building or Recorderâ€¢a Office of Pitkin County a copy of thi, resolution. structure, which are not applicable to other parcels, Adjustment on April 30, 1998 and after full deliberations and structures or buildings in the same zone district and INTRODUCED, READ AND ADOPTED by the Board of Adjustment which do not result from the actions of the applicant; of the City of Aspen on 914 7th day qi May, 1998 to Wit: consideration of the evidence and teatimony presented. <FUEN. ... -. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT OF The existing non-conforming location of the historic ChairÂ·person shed. which Nans both properties, coabined with the non- THE CITY OF ASPEN, COLORADO: conforming lot width of the properties, significutly I, the undersigned duly appointed and acting Deputy constrainâ€¢ the area available for development. City Clerk do certify that the foregoing ig a true and accurate copy of that resolution adopted by the Board of Adjustment of the Sectign_1. Findings of Fact. SD i 9.Zy14 HPC CONCEPT FRE 4 Ball.Lgn_2. Var lance Granted. City of Aspen, Colorado. at a meeting held on the day hereinabove stated. The Board of Adjustment makes the following findings of following variance from the terme of Chapter 24 of the Aspen Deputy City Clerk PROJECT NO 1411 fact: The Board of Adjustment does hereby grant the applicant the dek. f.uu_ 1. A development application for a variance was initiated Municipal Code: DRAWN BY. 1<PT by: Mr.Donald Krumm and Mr. Alan Bush for properties Approved as to content: COP\'RIGHT CoaJM PHI llc. with /treet addre/â€¢03 of 101 Ea/t Hallam Street and 105 Zaet A four foot rear yard and a five foot side yard setback -0 14 - Hallam Street, Aepen, Colorado. variance at both 101 East Hallam and 105 East Hallam to allow for the expansion of an existing shed by 4 1/2 feet to the west of the 2. Notice of the propowed variance has bean provided to existing wwt wall of gaid shed. Assistant City Attorney surrounding property owners in accordance with Section 24-6 205 (E) (4) b) of the Aspen Municipal Code. Evidence of .uch notice is on file with the City Clerk. Abh.R ~j:~ 1 1111111'111111111111'11111111!111111111111111111111111 424379 11/11/1-8 09:28A RESOLUTI DAVIS SILVI 1 L 424379 11/11/1998 09:20A RESOLUTI DAVIS SILVA - 424379 11/11/1998 09:264 RESOLUT! DAVIS SILVI 2 of 3 R 16.00 0 0.00 N 0.00 PIn(IN COUNTY CO 3 of 3 R 16.00 0 0.00 N 0.00 PITKIN COUNTY CO 1 of 3 R 18.00 0 0.00 N 0.00 PITKIN COUNTY co i SHEET TITLE Resolution No 2 of 1998 Resolution No 2 of 1998 Resoluton No 2 of 1998 LAND USE APPROVALS ORDINANCE NO. 16 (SERIES OF 2001) C Designer. The structure is a significant work of an architect 0, designer . : whose individual work has influenced the character of Aspen. 1. AN ORDINANCE OF THE ASPEN CITY COUNCIL GRANTING APPROVAL Migion k Pursuant to the findings set forth in Section 1, above. the City Council does FOR LANDMARK DESIGNATION OF 101 E. HALLAM STREET, LOT A AND D. Neighboihood Character. The suucture or site is a significant component of hereby designate as an Historic Landmark 101 E Hallam Street Lot A and the west 4.86 ~ . lÂ·HE wEST 4,86 FEET OF LOT B, BLOCK 65. CITY AND TOWNSITE OF an historicall) significant neighborhood and the preservation of the structure or feet of Lot B. Block 65, City and Townsite of Aspen, without conditions ASPEN site is important for the maintenance of that neighborhood chardÂ©ter. Â¥: Section 3: If any section. subsection. sentence, clause. phrase or portion of this Parcel Identification No. 2735-124-37-Of)1 E. Communit, Character. The structure or site is cnt,cal to the preservation of ordinance is for any reason held invalid or unconstitutional by any court of competent 1he character o f the Aspen community because of its relationship in terms of Si7;3. junsdiction. such provision and such holding shall no, affect the validity of the remaining location and architectural similarity to other structures or sites of historical or portions thereof. *,6. .121': .iiAA.S.-Â·Â·:..:. WHEREAS. the applicants, Jim and Patricia Gorman. represented by Mary A Avjian architectural importance: and Architects. have requested landmark designation for the property at 101 E. Hal}am Street, Section 4: This Ordinance shall not affect any existing litigation and shall not operate as I,ot A and the west 4.86 feet of Lot B. Block 65. City and Townsite of Aspen: and WHEREAS, the Aspen City Council has reviewed and considered the Landmark an abatement of any action or proceeding now pending under or by virtue of the 715 West Main Street Suite 204 Designation. has reviewed and considered those recommendations made by the ordinances repealed or amended as herein provided, and the same shall be conducted and Aspen, Colorado 81611 P 970.279.4157 F 866 770 5585 WHEREAS, pursuant to Section 26,420.020. requests for landmark designation shall be Community Development Department. the Historic Preservation Commission, and the concluded under such prior ordinances reviewed and recommended for approval, approval with conditions. or disapproval b> the Planning and Zoning Commigion. and has taken and considered public comment at a Community Development Director. by the HPC, and by the Planning and Zoning public hearing. and Swwn_& A public hearing on the Ordinance was held on the 14th day of May, 2001 at Commission at a public hearing, and then approved, apprnved Mth conditions, or 5+00 P.M. in the City Council Chamben, Aspen City Hall, Aspen Colorado, fifteen (15) disapproved at a public hearing bi' the City Council. and WHEREAS, the City Council finds that the Landmark Designation meets or exceeds all days pnor to which hearing a public notice of the same was published once in a applicable development standards of the above referenced Municipal Code sections, and newspaper of general circulation within the City of Aspen. 101 E HALLAM HALLAM LLC WHEREAS, the Community Development Director performed an analysis of the application based on the standards. found favorably for the application. and WHEREAS, the applicant requems, and Council hereby approves a one-time $2,000 INTRODUCED, READ AND ORDERED PUBLISHED as provided by law, by the 101 E Hallam St recommended approval of landmark designation: and landnlark grant pursuant to Section 26.420.0.10. if available in this fiscal year: and City Council of the City of Aspen on the 23rd day of April. 2001. Aspen, Colorado 81611 WHEREAS, the Aspen Historic Presenatiun Commission reviewed and recommended WHEREAS, the City Council finds that this Ordinance furthers and is necessary for the I approval â€žf landmark designation by a vote of 5-l on Apri] 11 2001 ; alid public health, safely and welfare, 4*( 4.4,13~-- WHEREAS, the Aspen Planning and Zoning Commission reviewed and recommended NOW, THEREFORE. BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE { Rachel E. Richards, !*For approval of landmark designation by a vote of 5 to 0 on April 17,2001; and CITY OF ASPEN, COLORADO, THAT: WHEREAS, all applications for Historic Landmark Designation shall meet two or more Section t: Pursuant to Section 26.420.020 of the Municipal Code. the City Council of the following Standards for Designation of Section 26.420.010 in order for Council to finds as follows in regard to the Historic Landmark Designation and Grant Request: 7Â«x.-.2Ue grant approval, namely: 1. The applicant's submission is complete and sufficient to afford review and '. Kathryn SÂ£*och, City Clerk A. Hi,terical Imponance: The structure or site is a principal or secondary evaluanon for approval i and, Cal 'b structure or site commonly identified or associated with a person or event of historical significance to the cultural. social. or political higtory of Aspen. the 2. The landmark designation is appropriate. fi nding that standards A (histoncal APPROVED AS TO FORM: State of Colorado. or the tjnited States, importance). B (architectural importance), D (neighbodood character) and E (community character) of Section 26.420.010 are met; and B. Architecturaj Impor,ance. The structure or site refiects an architectural Style f 'ill CONSULTANTS that is unique, distinct w of traditional Aspen character. or the s[ructure or site 3. The properly is eligible for. and the applicant shall receive a $2,000 landmark 2- SURVEYOR embodies the distinguishing characteristics of a significant or unique architectural designation grant. if funds are available in this fiscal year. John'Worchter, city Astorney Aspen Survey Eng ers Inc type (based on building form or use), or specimen. 2 20 S Galena Street Aspen. Colorado 81611 (970) 925-3816 1111111111111111!11111111111111111111111111111111111111 1 .11111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111 aspensurveyots@gl.il lin 465762 06/2'5/2001 11,210 ORDINANC DAVIS SILVI 4S5762 06/25/2001 11:21A ORDINANC DAVIS SILVA 2 of 4 R 20.00 D 0.00 N 0.00 PITKIN COUNTY CO 111111111111111111 Ill'11111111111111111 11111111 lili lili 1 of 4 R 20.00 0 0.00 N e.00 PITKIN COUNTY CO CIVIL 465762 06/25/2001 11:218 ORDINANC DAVIS SILVI 3 of 4 R 20.00 D e 00 N 0 00 PITKIN COUNTY Co TBD Resolution No 16 of 2001 Resolution No 16 of 2001 Resolution No 16 of 2001 MECHANICAL- TBD STRUCTURAL TBD FINALLY, adopted, passed and approved this 14th day of May, 2001. =76/44<5~ CONTRACTOR TED ;achel E. Richards, M~or I.-1ug.*-0 1 4 2320:- CATE Â·C: UE..ICAÂ·10' , Kathryn S. *h, City Clerk G plarl/1./'asperehpaca5estiandnwk/101/.ord SO 9/23/14 HPC CONCEPT REV PROJECT NO 1.1 M DRAWN BY: KPT COPYRIGHT FORUM PHI Ll C. 11'Im!111111'jillmill'1111!111111!111111'u 11,11111 455762 06/25/2001 11:21A ORDINANC DAVIS SILVI 4 of 4 R 20.00 0 0 00 N 0.00 PITKIN COUNTY CO SHEETTITLE LAND USE Resolutor No 16 of 2001 APPROVALS =:' m .:I::: I.Vr .... RESOLUTION OF THE ASPEN PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION .AÂ·. APPROVING AN APPLICATION FOR HISTORIC LANDMARK DESIGNATION FOR THE PROPFRTÂ¥ LOCATED AT 101 E, HALLAM D. Neighborhood Character. The structure or site is a significant component oi STREET, LOT A AND THE WEST 4.86 FEET OF LOT B, CITY AND an historically significant neighborhood and the preservation of the structure or TOWNSITE OF ASPEN. COI.ORADO site is important for the mamenance of that neighborhocid character. 644â‚¬~ 1 t. PARCEL ID#2735.124â€ž37-001 E. Communio, Characier. The structure or site is critical to the preservation of UU.+ (Â·95 - : 4 the character of the Aspen community because 01 its relationship in terms of size7 location and architectural similarity to other structures or sites of historical or RESOLUTION NO. 17, SERIES OF 201 1 alÂ·chitectural i,â€žportance: and .t 36.:Â· ....2.%61Â£ aL# WHEREAS, the applicants, Jim and Patricia Gorman, have requested Historic Landmark WHEREAS, during a duly noliced public hearkng on April 17.200 1. the Aspen Planning Designation for the property located at 101 E. Hallam Street Lot A and the west 4.86 ket and Zoning Commission considered the recommendation made by the Community 715 West Main Street. Suite 204 of Lot B. Block 65. City and Townsite of Aspen. Colorado. The property is currently Development Director and HIC, took und considered public testimony and Asper, Colorado 81611 listed on the "Inventory of Historic Sites and Structures"Â· and recommended. by a vote of 5 to 0, that City Council approve landmark designation P 970.2794157 F 866 770 5585 finding,hat standards A.B. D and E are met. WHEREAS, pursuant to Section 26.420.020.requests for landmark designation shall be reviewed and recommended for approval, approval with conditions. or disapproval by the NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED: Community Development Director. hy the HPC, and by the Planning and Zoning Commission at a public heanng, and then approved. approved with conditions. or That the Planning and Zoning Conmlission recommends Council approve landmark 101 E HALLAM disapproved Br a public hearing by the City Council. and designation fo, 101 E. Hallam Streel. Lot A and the west 4.86 feet of Lot B. Block 65. HALLAM LLC City and Townsite of Aspen. Colorado 101 E Hallam St WHEREAS, the Community Development Director performed an analysis of the Aspen. Colorado 81611 application based on the standards. found favorably for the application. and APPROVED by the Commission at its regular meeting on April 17.200 1. recommended approval of Landmark designation: and WHEREAS, the Aspen Hisloric Preservation Commission reviewed and recommended APPROVED AS TO FORM: PLANNING AND ZONING approval of landmaik designation by a vote of 5-1 on April 11,2001. and COMMISSION: WHEREAS, all applications for Historic Landmark Designalion shall meet two or more r--3 1 i of the following Standards foI lkâ€žgnation of Section 26.420.010 in order for P&Z to -&**ill f Robert inaich. Chair grant approval namely: A Hism,ical Imporiance: l'he structure or site isa principal or secondar> structure or site commonly identified or associated with a person or event of historical significance to the cultural, social, or political history of Aspen. the ATTEST: State of Colorado, or the Unitcd States. H. Architectural lmponance. The structure or site reflects an architectural style 1 %08#1 64/ that is unique. distinct or of traditional Aspen character. or the structure or site CONSULTANTS embodies the distinguiching characteristics of a significant or unique architectural r ie Lothian, Deputy City Clerk type (based on building form m use). or specimen SURVEYOR A en Survey Engineers in 2 0 S G/]ena Street C, De.wigner. The structure is a significant work of an architect or designer Aspen.Colizaao 81611 whose individual work has influenced the character of Aspen (970) 925-3816 aspensurveyors@ginal! coin 1111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111 111111111111 1111111111111111111111111111111111111111111 CIVIL Â· 455768 06/25/2001 11:24A RESOLUTI DAVIS SILVI 455768 06/25/2001 11:249 RESOLUT] DAVIS SILY] TBD 1 of 2 R 10.00 D 0.00 N 0.00 PITKIN COUNTY CO 2 of 2 R 10.00 0 0.00 N 0.00 PITKIN COUNTY CO Resolution No 17 of 2001 Resoluton No 17 of 2001 MECHANICAL TBD 4. Standard: The proposed development enhances or does not diminish from the conditions of approval are known and understood and must meet with the Historic architectural character or integrity of a designated historic structure or part RESOLUTION OF THE ASPEN HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION thereof; and Preservation Officer prior to applying for the building permit. APPROVING AN APPLICATION FOR FINAL DEVELOPMENT AND 9. The General Contractor and/or Superintendent shall be required to obtain a STRUCTURAL VARIANCES FOR THE PROPERTY LOCATED AT 101 E. HALLAM STREET, WHEREAS, Amy Guthrie, in her /aff report dated October 10,2001, performed an specialty license m historic preservation pnor to rcceivlng a building permit. TBD LOT A AND THE WEST 4.86 FEET OF LOT B, AND 105 E. HALI.AM STREET, analysis of the application based on the standards, and recommended approval of the 10. The applicant shall provide a plan for the active protection and shoring of the shed THE EAST 25.14 FEET OF LOT B AND THE WEST 8 FEET OF LOT C, BLOCK on 1.05 E. Hallam. This plan. as well as thorough documentation o f the existing 65, CITY AND TOWNS]TE OF ASPEN, COLORADO project; Ind shed, including photographs and measured drawings, will be required prior to issuance of building pemlit, WHEREAS, at their regular meeting on October 10, 2001, the Historic Preservation PARCEL ID#2735-12+37-001& 2735-124-37-002 l l. The applicant shall provide the City with a written agreement between themselves Commission considered the application, found the application to meet the standards and and the owner of 105 E. Hallam Street describing that measures that will be taken CONTRACTOR to be consistent with the "City of Aspen Historic Presen'anon Design Guidehnes" and RESOLUTION #45, SERIES OF 2001 to protect the hal f of the shed that it is hoped can be preserved, and the manner in TBD approved the application by a vote of 4 to 2. which any damage that may occur shall be corrected. WHEREAS, the applicants, Jim and Patncia Gorman, represented by Mary Holley, have NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED: requested Final Development approval and Vanances for the property located at 101 E. Hallam Street, Lot A and the west 4.86 feet of Lot B, and 105 E. Hallam Street, the east That Flnal Development and Vanances for the property located at 101 E. Hallam Street, ~mf-1///2-.'-L_. 222Â·I. I . 25.14 feet of Lot B and the west 8 fbet of Lot C. Block 65. City and Townsite of Aspen. Lot A and the west 4,86 feet of Lot B, Block 65, City and Townsite of Aspen and 105 E. W ._Â·F PULLICATIioN r The properties have both been listed on the 'Inventory of Historic Sites and Structures", Hailam Street, the east 25.14 feet of Lot B and the west 8 feet of Lot C Block 65. City and APPROVED BY THE COMMISSION at its regular meeting on the toth day of m and October, 2001. Townsite of Aspen be approved with the following conditions: WHEREAS, all development in an "H," Historic Overlay District or development 1. The HPC has granted the following variances: a.5 footwest side yard vanance for involving a historic landmark must meet all four Development Review Standards of the existing house, a 5 foot east side yard variance to build in the locanon of the Section 26,72.010(D) of the Aspen Land Use Code in order for HPC to grant approval, existing shed. a 3.5 foot west sideyard variance for new construction (the linking namely: front and rear yard setback vanance, a 5 foot rear yard setback variance, and Approved u to Form: - ""-- element), a 5,5 foot combined sideyard setback variance, a 9.4 foot combined 1. Standard: The proposed development is compatible in general design, massing waiver of one parking space. and volume, scale and site plan with designated historic structures located on the 2. The HPC hereby grants the following variances for the shed on 105 E. Hallam parcel and with development on adjacent parcels when the subject site is in a "H," L J=' 'Â·-L-1.Â» i Street, m the event that the board agrees that it must be reconstructed due to Didl Hoefer, Assistant â‚¬ity Attorney SD ' 9/23/14 HPC CON,,1 : e RF\/ Historic Overlay Distnet or Ls adjacent to an Historic Landmark. For historic conditions that cannot be forseen at this time: a rear ywrd setback variance of 5 feet landmarks where proposed development would extend into front yard, sk/yard and and a west sideyard setback variance of 5 feet to allow it to be rebuilt In its current rear yard setbacks. extend into the minimum distance between buildings on the lot, location. - exceed the allowed floor arca by up to five hundred (500) square feet, or exceed the 3. information on all venting locations and meter locations shall be provided for PROJECT NO 1411 Approved as to content: HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION allowed :ite covered by up to five (5) percent, HPC may grant necessary variances review and approval by staffand monitor when the information is available. DRAWN BY. 1<PT after making a finding that such variation is mire compatible in character with Lhs 4, Submit a demolition plan, as part of thÂ© building perÂ·mit plan set. indicating historic landmark and the neighborhood than would be development in accord with exactly what areas o f the shed are to be removed. dimensional requirements. In no event shall variations pursuant to this Section 5. No elements are lu bc added to the historic house that did not previously exist. No COPYRIGHT FORUM PH. LLC exceed thosc variations allowed under Section 26.520.040(BXZ), for dctached existing exterior materials other than what has been specifically approved herein accessory dwelling units, and may be removed wilhoIt the approval of staff and monitor. 6, HPC staff and monitor must approve the type and location of all extenor lighting 2. Standard: The proposed development reflects and is consistenl with the fixtures. ATTEST: character of the neighborhood oftheparcel proposed for development. 7, There shall be no deviations from the extenor clevations as approved without first 1 , being reviewed and approved by HPC staft- and monitor. 3. Standard: The proposed development enhances or does not detract from the 8. The applicant shall be required to provide the contractor with copies of the HPC 41.<-c.. VE.4- 6-1- historic significance of designated historic structures located on the parcel resolution appllcable to this project. The contractor must submit a letter Kathy Strickland, Chief Deputy Clerk proposed for development iron adjacent parcels. addressed to HPC staff as part of the building permit application indicating that all SHEET TITLE 11/21/2001 10 13,A 461105 ~ #1111~ I'll'll N 111~1 MI'll'111~11~ ~I lilli l mt~ 461105 P.9, 1 of 3 S]LV!. *S PT~~IN COUN~, CO R 15.00 D 0,00 Pâ€¢gâ€¢. 2 of 3 ./.[0 DAVi~ ...'/ C.:./ c. . 15 ./ . 0 06 ./.2001 10:13A IM BI 1111 lill i * 1 1111 P.g. 3 of 3 11/2,2/01 10:lia -- ... DA.5 .1TKIN COITY . . lilli ..... 461105 LAND USE Resolution No 45 of 2001 Resolution No 45 of 2001 Resolubon No 45 of 2001 APPROVALS / CITY MOWNâ‚¬ll SW *, CORNER BLOCK 64 10 20 ~k_teR'ZONTAL CONTROL N Â° A LEGEND AND NOTES BEARINGS BASED ON FOUND CITY MONUMENTS AS SHOWN N 14Â°53 49-E SET SURVEY MONUMENT 25947 SURVEY CONTROL UTILITY BOX g c FENCE WOOD OR METAL TITLE INFORM/TION FURNISHED BY PITKIN COUNTY TITLE INC CASE NO. PCT24O51W DATED MAY 5 2014 ZONED. -R-64 11' SETBACKS AS PER RESOL-ION â€¢45 SERIES OF 200 NO LONGER IN EFFECT AS PER CGA PL/,NNING EMS'l STORAGE PERIOLI, PATIO. SPA. CONC ,44[) FENCES ENCROCil INTO HAILAM ROW 6 " SHOWN STREET NIa PCr 1213122__ I STREET LIGPT 1 1-\ /052\-- l f 1 r- 4 1 1 r-----d ) 1- 1 ~Offc' ' /, R f gil 0 lip llÂ» , HOUSE L ~ -101- / 4 2 # 1 1 1 /87 / Ial 1 1 r --91 312Â»\\- 1/Â»9 0 4, ~ HOUSE Riel * i -% _ 1(rio -Z 11 21 r----L~ ,~~RAG:L L~ f il El 07Â»J 7 % - 1 1 1 1 ,-- 1 1 7 1 1 11 ht- i PATBO J Ill , 1 1 f W PAT 10 90 / /k / CERTIFICATION 1 cole 1 --- L 1 SLAB --71- -) 51-1 f 1 JOHN HOWORTH HERFENY CER1 IFY TO PARK LLC AND PITKIN COUN'Y TTLE, INC AND/OR I ty AND THA+ IT IS A MONUMENTED LIND SLRVEY SHOWING THE LOOTiON OF ALL STRUCTURES, 4 AWGNS TWA' TH S IS AN ' IMPROVEMENT SURVEY PLAT AS DEFINED BY CRS 38-51-102Â£9 DATED~.1~1+.4. Â·Â·- *,S,BLE UTILITIES, FENCE' HEDGES OR WALLS SITHTED ON THE DESCRIBED PARCEL AND F 5 60.p ' 2 WTHIN.*IVE FIi.*F b.l 86UNDARIEL OF SUCH PARCEL INY CONFLICTING BOUNDARY EVIDENCE /1 OR VIBIBLAII#r rÂ»*INTS INC ALL EASEMENTS, UNDEAGROUND UT LITIES AND TUNNELS 013 LK / Nx / . 06/'. ~ DESCRI~07'IN,1 1~1<li.Â·4.1 TY -ITLE, INC COMMITMENT FOR 'ITLE INSURANCE / SI GN~tÂ».lk'-1.3.L 25947 * LOING % - Â»-- Et- -2.\\-1 i - 2 vE/3r---- 29030- ;' IMPROVEMENT SURVEY dll.EY CONTAINING 3.486 SO FT ./. -0 6 W C - ---*- j 0A Bl.OCK BRAVEL 65 LOT A AND THE WES-ERLÂ¥ 4 86 FEET OF LOT B J BLOCK 85. CITY AND TOWNITE OF ASPEk 4 - PREPARED BY j \ ASPEN SJRVEÂ¥ ENGINEERS, INC 2 0 SOLÂ» GAL" STREET / C Tr MONUMENT Sw ASFEN, COLORADO 8 i,>1 /: CORNEr BLOCK 65 ACCORD 4. T. COLOR.0 .. rou MJM COMMENCE ANÂ¥ L./t ACTION BASED trON ANÂ¥ DEFECT ON â„¢]S PLAT WITiaN â„¢REE YEARS }- -- PHON.2/ W [303 3 925-3816 AFTER You FIRSÂ¥ DISCOVER SUCH DE~EC- l. I EvENT I. ANY ACT ON - mASED UP- ANV DEFECT IN TH!8 P. BE Co.!ENCED MORE THAN TE,Â· DATE JOB YEARS FRV T- DATE OF THE CERTIFICATION %.I HEREON THE 17!Fr CATION 15 W) C / NOT *Er 51-PED WIT. T. SEAL OF THE BlmÂ¥EYOR .,4 25 808 FORTH GARMISCH 9?REET 90Â» L 715 West Main Street. Suite 204 Aspen, Colorado 81611 P 970.279 4157 F 866 770 5585 Zoning Allowance & Project Summary 101 E Hallam St 101 E HALLAM HALLAM LLC Proposed Development lSingle Fam,iy 1 Remodel/Addibon 101 E Hallam St - Aspen, Colorado 81611 PaMet # 127351247001 Zone District IR# Allowed * Ipropo,ed Setbacks i Principal) Reference ExISEIng # .C 1Â·4' llc R" -Principal m ' ' 0 Valance Re: 4 9 Â·Â·Â·r'Â·.Â·i: 06ce Res It' ~-. ~I_ wes .'Â·, Iyes Supplemental Breakdown Info bist,ng ]Required ~Proposed Reference Â·.et Leasatle/Co n. Su FT INiA _.1,A _ NIA CONSULTANTS 4.: Â· Â·Â·Â· 3 foÂ· R-6 SURVEYOR - -flo .Â·. Cl - /: ft MA As#46-5679-ey EigineeTE.-1% r lfÂ· Â· ar.Ing 210 S Galâ‚¬:na Stieet Aspen. Colorado 81611 Land Value Summary Actual Value (970) 925-3816 Relerence . ind1 - 1Â·.I Â· Â· 4. I~!y A"se:ssor .spensurveyofs@ginail coin Improvements ~340 000 11, Â· :. '.inty Abbessur ---- CIVIL. To!al |$2 7/: ..Wl , Â· 1â€¢:in Lounty Ass..Mor_ TBD MECHANICAL Net Lot Area TBD 101 E Hallam St Zone District RequÂ·rements Wede'eni.e t Mli; LÂ·'ss Lot Area (per R f ~6 000 Si ft , 3.000 Sa Ft for h:storic Laram 1 - r.11:;,e ..1 .3.-| -STRUCTURAL Min Net Lot A ea (per R.E 4 500 Sq Ft 3 000 Sq Ft for Histor:c Lan<MÂ· 1 P[opoerties TBD 2L 100440[~2_ _._~ Lot Size Per Survey Reference Â·Â·Â· 'i 'r Â·. Â·.abbe 'r.. 2.Â·' Â·-Â· 020 1 21. l/ | CONTRACTOR iÂ·~..3:<-Neti/,AÂ·. -Â· ' ~ 0 020Â· 1 TBD Â·' 1 - -:1 area . L 1:.Â·allilliÂ»lulÂ·<-/. Net Lot Are b /%:It:'Cl Survey :: 1 Â©2320 Â· DATECE:PUBLICATION Allowable Floor Area - --- - - - 101 E Hallam St - Allowable Floor Area Reference Per R-6 26 710060 2,536.08 square feet (2 400 square feet of floor area, Plus 28 square feet of floor area for each addrtional 100 square feet In SD 9/23/14 HPC CONCEPT REV Net Lot Area, up to a maximum of 3,240 square feet) Unique Approvals Reference PROJECT NO. 1411 DRAWN BY KPT Vanances |Reference COPYRIGHT FORUM PHi. LLC Exemptions Reference First 250 sq ft exempt, Next 250 sq R to exclude 50% of area, Garage Exemption Areas above 375 sq ft have no exclusions 26 575 020 D 7 Z-005 15% of gross = 380 4 exempt 26 575 020 D 5 Deck Exemption Front Porch Exempt = 52 50 square feet Z-005 &Z-006 Floor Area Summary Existing Gross (Sq Ft) Existing Flom Area (Sq Ft) Proposed Gross (Sq Ft) Proposed Floor Area (Sq Ft) Reference Lower level 1.652.50 38.92 Z-004 SHEET TITLE ~ Garage (located on Main Level) 282.00 16.00 2-005 Main Level 1,18475 1,18475 1176 00 1,17600 Z-005 Common Building 108.00 108.00 108.00 108.00 Z-005 Deck Area 460.25 000 400 00 000 Z-005 & Z-006 Upper Level 963.75 963.75 1 137.25 1.13725 2-008 Z-001 TOTAL 2.715.75 2.256.50 4.755.75 2.476.17 ZONING SUMMARY : - 1.-- Resident'al Design Standards Unique Approvals & Variances Residential Design Standards Compliance i ~ iÂ· ~~Â·): i;4Â§:E *34 See Land Use Approvals for complete lisl of approved resolutions and/or admin approvals 101 E Hallam Street , *8:: /...: ~11 RDS Sectioi, Code Description Compliance Description Referenced Z Sheets A Site Design 1. Building orientation. 11 Â· -4 ?le, 2 E. r r pal structures shaN be parallel to the stieet On coiref IcÂ·ts both Thus lot :s a corn/ mot afid the ex sing sÂ·.reet facing facades are parallel to the intersect ng Survey - 1 Â·Â·Â· A..6121% ,-Â·:. Â·' . Â· Â·: Â·. :Â·Â· Â· r -t be paralleito the intersectng skeets On curviline/Â·streets the streets â€¢ures shallbe parallel to the tangent Olthe midpoint 01 the arÂ¢ ofihe / 'iÂ·Â· 0Â·tealâ€¢,0-Af 5-- Â·,.Â·E asoutlinedir.Subsection 2641001084$,4,31: Deexemptfron thts Te : Â· One (1} elen:ent sc'as a bay ve' liw or dormer. placed al a Nont come: of the 6 .m Â· 1 - De on a dagonal fromthe st[eet if desired 715 West Main Street. Suite 204 2 Build-to lines. Â· Â·Â·Â· WÂ· Â·,4. 1. Â·t. .,Â·Â· irÂ· ' IÂ· Â·it.,ousand(1500(]su: iÂ·Â·Â·feel atleastsÂ·xty Re'cent Thisiotil/ cornâ‚¬.r lotand morerhan 80%. ofthefacade is,Mitin 5'ofthe minimums/tback Z-003 P ! , â€¢Itnin f.ve (5) feet of the nÂ· .nimum tront yard setback Me Aspen, Colorado 81611 30 COine . 1 .Â· . 4 Â·Â· ' P! the ma on the frontage Nth the longest bRock length P 970.2.79.4157 F. 866 770 5585 PaTches may be used to meet trie si)rty pe[/ent (60%, standard 3. Fences. s 7Â· : -Â·Â· Â·~gerows and plantrÂ· 00,:es "/ .- be mole tnan Forty-tv,0 ~4/' " '436 hiÂ·y Th e ex:gi g 3 M wrought 1 Ton fence ls existlng to ,eman 2-003 Â·Â·Â· â€¢:/1, d from natural grack iriallart uÂ·Â· ~vi ,/rd cf the? Iront facaae of Â·he howse MeÂ· -made De Â·Â·:s ae prohibited in the fiont yaw/setback 101 E HALLAM B. Building Form 1. Secondary mass. All newsingle family and dilplex strucluies shall locate at leastteri percerd 1Â·Â· . i Â·it :Â· i Â·!, -hu: iot conta ns an ex 'Â·Â·Â·. t nist 'Â·2 structufe to remain that predatet 1 e RDS Survey HALLAM LLC square footage at)ove grade i, 3 mass which is completely deta:"Al '-7- :,1 :Â·Â· build p G linked to :t b, a su_. na,A hnking elere Â·int Thisstern. Â· :Â· 2 Â· . ... Â·Â·Â·L 101 E Hallam St Farcels with,nthe Aspen,rÂ·' Â· , i "11<Â·S Aspen. Colorado 81611 bulk*:gs s.Â¢n as garageÂ¢ Â· 1 , li, â€ž Â·Â· son Â· - s. 1. r r Â·-/ -Â·.' Opr,ate uses toi the secondatv mas. r/: Â·:Â· irÂ·/la primary and secondary mass 1-=!' beat least te length Â· feetir wd!4 and:.,16., .Iâ€¢- Il' frlot .(16 ) fer ... .1 .1 1 ! Â· Â·Â· i.Â·161 over the lining ele r, i â€¢ â€¢ :. rinitl railing foranacce,r.r ,-1] io,iat ~.erali' g. m Â·Â·Â·â€žÂ·..urn ...soriably nece= .- Â·. 1~ I a. - i I r se. und bulk e . 06. Â·30' ,-inae and tri iailing must be 5050 01 more transparm C. Parking, Garagesand 1. For ail residential uses : a) Parking. garages and carpolls shan be accessed flom ar, amey ot private road The proposed garage s accessea from the alley 2.003 Carports that have access from an alley of private road. the t.] I f the garage tools are visdble from a street or /NeÂ·y theri they shall be .!ngle-staH dOOTI Or The ploposed garage doof is a single stall docr Z-202 following standards shall co .tieÂ·stall.... desgned to appear like 'ir,gle-stall doors apply: c if the garage docs are nct vis:Ne from a stree' or a ey tne garage doors may le either The proposed garage doo' is a single stall door 2-202 ing e stan or non": dout' e.staiÂ· ga-age doors 2. Fo~ all residential uses a) On the street faceÂ·g facade<s; the ,Â·ilth of tne Ir:Â·:rig area on the fi,st f'oor shall beat least. The garage is accessed vidi an alley therefore this section does not appl: Z-003 that have access only ffom hÂ·ve (54 feet gfeater tr:anthe w:dth of the garage or ca'port a pubilic streâ‚¬t. the -- CONSULTANTS following standards shall , b) The fret facade of the garage or the fron.-most supportÂ·ng column ora carport shall be set The garage is accessed via an alley therefore this iectlon does not apply ZÂ·003 be apply. back at east ten (103 fee:Â· fuither fforn the s:reel than .he front-most wal! cd the house SURVFYOR AÂ·.,en . Â· i.- y Eng.bers. 46 c) On lots of at least f.keen thoosand (15.000) square teet a size, the garage of carport may The gaiage is accessed via an alley theefore this sel. does not apply 7-003 210 S G. . a Street be for.vafd of the front facaae Of the house on y if the garage doors or carport en:ry are Aspen. Colorado 81311 perperidicular / the street (side-!oaded (970) 925-3816 aspensurvey.'@gmai] coin d) When the 'loof of a garage or carport is above er be:ow the street level the dr evay cut The gatage is accessed via an alley the:efore thi seebon does not apply Z-003 Â¥,thin the Â¢:091 yard setback shall not exceed le (2 j feet :n depth measured from natu fai CIVIL g.de TBD Z-003 â€¢. --Â· .Â·.Â· Icul' entrance *. j. of a garage or ca port Inal rot be greater tnan twentv-:ou: The garage is accesseci vi an alley therefore this section does not apply f) Ifthe garage doors are visible from a pÂ·:bhe street or alley trlen they siu'i De single sta r The garage :s accessed via an alley therefore this sect] on does not apply 2-003 dcor: or dotibleÂ·stall doors def,gned to appear like s,ngleÂ·sta doors MECHANICAL- D Building Elements 1 Street oriented entrance AlÂ· Â·. ':,Â·~.:Â·.Â·Â·,~:Â· Â·Â·tÂ·..Â·Â·Â·*(Â·,Â·Â· eeat ..tri,1, 1.:;0:!.â€¢ I: .1,Â·11Â·Â·:Â·Â·;Â·,Â·i,Â·,1 lhâ‚¬ c. Â·Â·:ing fii'.:.Â· â€ž ti~.-iÂ·,= has a street opented ent,ance aim a stieet facing pincipal midow 2-201 'TE[5 and principal window. W to rer, airi ha:z at le=_' Â·Â· :' ,ented eaÂ·=Â·Â·Â·'., 1Â·Â·prv:.iur,4, u: I..,rÂ·Â·Â·(rl...:Â·::,Â·Â·.:UC, have a /:reet fai, , )/ i ! Â·'lldow On (t Â·Â· Â· 1 08 , I les and prin.,Il l Â· ./. 9 -rull face Â£!cnever street has a g .ater block iengtr This stendard shah bes/ded if all oftne following <orid:tions are..t - -- Â· Â·Â· --- ------- STRUCTURAL /1 1 heer,lry door -' .a. 11 ad ber'Dinoret .5 â€¢Â·Â·I' ': fr-Â·r,9-: fic:'. Â·Â·.3 TreÂ·.Â· The existng f !17 dÂ· -x â€¢, ipi'Â·.,io . Â·Â· Â· r:Â·.)râ‚¬ " 17 ten (10) feet backlrorn the: front most wall of 2-102 TBD mosit wah ofthe bimu ng Ealry a. " shall no' !4 1/!i: ' an tight l), 'Â· Â· : the buitang and is not t/He Â·nan eÂ·.:-Â· (83 fee[ M A Â·.Â·Â· Â·Â·Â·ed eÂ·..,7 po/hi N filk Â· 31 or . aor. sqi. Â·'Â·i.. Â·.Â·Â· Â· r .Â· Â· cÂ· L. -,3) The ex.Ibng histor c front pÂ¢//1 16 gieater than 50 square feet #th a minimir depth (,[ 6 feet 2-003 & 2-102 feet ve. be part of the front facade Entry Porche s arld canow Es :hall not De no e t .8 one !1 k t.tory in heighl c) A 61.reâ‚¬.i-fac.ng pri,~Cipal v,i';dow le(1:JileS that a signif :301 w ndow (1 g'CÂ·up of vi ndows face The exjsting stieet.Â·41Â¢:ng facades contan significant g:oups c! wlitdows 2-201 & 2-202 CONTRACTOR street T'BD 2. First story element AN residential builcings sna have a f rs: storÂ¥ streetÂ·facing ele,Â·-: --- Â· -i 'Â· 4Â·1 . This lot conta;ns an e*isting hustoric structu~e to remain that predates the RDS Z-003 comprises at lesÂ·ttmnh:Â·Â·Â·Â·,nt (20'4) <)f lie bil,= DÂ·:7Â·Â· Â· Ise,ieasÂ·.511(6]fee'â€¢Â·-11Â· Â·allthefirstsr.Â·Â·,Â·.Â·'i- .Â· Â·.Â· -..."Â·â€žÂ·~;tile first story element lic . n s -â€¢,Â·90[ 1 Ving spau, 1 Â·-â‚¬ 9-' : -: '1-1- 2,Â·.Â·Â·Â·â€ž " :Â· -- si ial| riot exceed ten (1(,lei.Â· 1. ledÂ· -edto thEÂ· Plate 1, Â·Â· Â·Â· - 7 3 6.. : â‚¬ a poir h or living space Access,Â·Â· e space (wrÂ·rÂ·ner it :s a dec Â· 1 Â·. nclosea / iall not De 320Â·Â·Â· DATECFPUSLICATION allowed overthet, gor/elum' v Â· accâ€¢ -:be s#th,-ovel the .mwin first story elements on the f ont fa*aide s' . ot be pitu uded 3. Windows. a SH=I facing wr,di/ 5Â»:all not spari througn the area where a seÂ¢and fl >011Â·pvei would The ex,Ming and wel):sed st/et-facing mndows (50 rict span thrcugh 91'Ie (9, and twel 3 9 1 1 &2 typic.. . cÂ·, Â·1 which is be:weer, r:ine (93 and twelve feet (121 above thâ‚¬ firnshed D.ist Noe, FOf fret above the Linisned ftrst floor interie 9-Es th?measurement wi! be made ! r 'Â· - ,Â·At laâ€¢ 1 89 4 orÂ·te ex s s A TEansom â€¢M 'dow above the ma:ri EÂ·,it:g Â·s xempt __ ___- -- -- from this sta ja d b, 1 riore than one (1 J non-orthogonal window shall be allowed on each facade of the The existing historic contains one norrorthogora 9/160'.vs to remar} All proposed windows ZÂ·201 & Z.202 buii .Â·Â· A Â· GA non orthogonal window iri a gable end may t)â‚¬Â· divided v.tth niumons and st:Il a!â‚¬1 0!thogonal be cor~ 3-ve! orle (10 non-ortnogonal v.indow The requirement shaN oniy appiy to Subsect on 26 41. i 52 SD 9/23/14 HPC CONCEPT REV. 4. Lightwells. A]l areaways Â· ghtwells and'or Sta f\â€¢/|13 on the street-facing facadefs, 01 a building shall be The pic Â·:.Â·., ' i Â·.,u.. 1- ' Â· rE. sed behi: d the front most vA~!1 of the budding arid are not 2-003 ent,rely recessed behind the f ont-most wall of the bulidir.g located or -, Â·. streetÂ·:a~.Â·,g facade PROJECT NO. 1411 E Context 1. Materials. a) T te q. a ity of the e)(term' nlatenal& and deb Is anatheqi applicatron sha/be consistend on The quali, of the extÂ·wor mateÂ·als ar:6 their application is cons.teni or al s.des of t",A 2-201 & Z 202 al! sides of the builling boildling DRAWN BY: KpÂ·lÂ· b] Maleria:s snal! be used in waÂ¥st.hataretrue tothe,r characteristles For instancestucco The use cirÂ· =.12,:- : is tÂ·.,e to thai. charactenstics Proposed matenall will tieE approwed at Z-201 &Z-202 *nti is a light of non braning maleÂ·nai, shan. not be used below a fÂ·eavy material such as HPC Final ki .Â·r . COPYRIGHT FORUM PHI. Ll.C SiGnE c) H gbly re lective surfaces 5:had not be Lised as exterili matenals There are no rroposed highly refied ve matenals Proposed materials .01! be approved at Z-El & Z-202 HPO F,na Re, eu 2, Inflection. The fol o'Mng standard must be met toi parces whion are sa thousanc 23,000 square teet or This DarceÂ· s less tnan six thousand (6.000; Square feet theretore thE section does not apply Survey over and aq maried in Subsdtion 26 410 010 8 2 aill a/leÂ·s:(01'bullding â‚¬ xists dileÂ¢tly ad/acent tothe subjece *L.1 new constÂ·ucticri This parce. :s less than sly thousarid (6,000) squae feet thâ‚¬qâ‚¬t<He this section doeEÂ· ret apply Suivey muslstep down,0 ont-'for' 81 he ghialong their common re one-stoÂ·y builangs on both sides of the s:it,ject site the app,cant may choose . 3 toward wh ch to InflÂ·. SHEET TITLE A one-stoty buddirin shall bâ‚¬Â· definâ‚¬Â·d a P.' f billiÂ· .alimeari I e ./._. I o This Fared is ess tran six thousand (6.000) squareleet thereferethis sectier. (10â‚¬:5 neÂ· apply Survey ponion of a Stf:Mure whe,/ there is c . usable Ilv:ng space at least twelve (12) fet w'' 3: 4,5 ': 4 , nont,ge This â€ž1 .4 -:11 t Ibet by provie.g e one ston elerner, ch is also at lea twe ve ( 12) feet w e Z-002 stree. 1Tontage and)ne{1)st)17 tall a.,arbark /10:191 cominon Â·otlirea< t ~ build:ag is one il) story RDS COMPLIANCE IR#2 t E HALLAM STREET E HALLAM STREET 715 West Main Street. Suite 204 Aspen. Colorado 81611 <- P 970.279.4157 F. 866 770 5585 V) ' 1.1,44//1 1 - 54 101 E HALLAM -5 <. 9 1-0Lk# 1Â«-Â«-2-- 'll ' \ t.,4,1-'152 J '1~24 1 * 1 <1 tlli il~i~~4Â¥f'f \ - 1 - ~7~~ '>$~F~OPE~Et-rY_~INE HALLAM LLC 1 ~\ ~1 ~ 4-2 2&1 4/ ~' TA' - 101 E Hallam St Aspen, Colorado 81611 7'-7' PROPERTLLINE \ Â·C -Â· i -W - ,44 /30'Â·,-(..02-t>c ~ ~ ~' t i k.f...p... 1 1 A~J - , M 191 > 1 > --- bl - U 77 7--Â· 1 ~ 9 1 7 +1 4. 1 --22 4 0-1-4 1-n 4 3 1.-r-7 Â» ' 1 At j \\ 4+1 K\Ov 47 I '1 2 c, 1 '3 i. - ./. Â»40 SETS.ACIOCINE] 1 SETBAqi' ONE I 4 .' PRONTYARD&'TBACK ; * IT EFt 2-003 IDS /2 i r, Â· H'34 4 422'Gf.f 1 50 12*94.5 001 V 5 - 1 1 -9.~-1-11 4 tr-Fjj . Â»'4,49-10 LINE OF --2,>'F V I -Â« i uNE of '1.--70-ff-14"3 EXTERIOR WAL.LAN' / T\._\ . EXTERIOR gyir 1 )04 1 1-\ 1 -CONSULTANTS Yu '//1 j 1 ~,IT--7 ] SURVE.YOR 1._CÂ·_20 2,1 111 :/i : Ly 1 . 111 3. 10 Z Aspen Suivey-EKg-iiiâ‚¬;em'-i-Ti-E 210 S Galena Street EXISTING 3FT WROUGHT-IRON I Â» FE . >1 FENCE TO REMAIN -I - 84 : TO REMAIN $ (970) 925-3816 - EXISTING FENCE ~ , I Aspen, Colorado 81611 PER 2-003 RDS A 3 \N - : 0 1- m CD 0 5 6 aspensurveyols@gmail com 9 5 2 1 CIVIL LU . J TBD MECHANICAL _ . ~ t ~ i TED #1 ' 1 < 3 0 0 - 1,1Â·< ,%0" NORI,1 OF LINE EXTERIOR \ HISTORIC WALLSTOREMAIN*/7 53.-7 7 ---1--------- 42419'4.*, I i STRUCTURAL SEE ELEVATIONS hz\) 3*t-,th,Wy l), 2Â©J ! l.4... 4*ESS LIGHTWELL 1 1 6 +'1 4 41,1 2 2 i | E-1-IL" .\1 19Lf--40 1-aD SHEETSZ-201 & 2-20<) .~ 'Fai*j#y#Slpf: V.j,, 'Â· ( 1~R Z Q03 RDS D 4 . E f ~~~~ 4%6~ 140-11,i- ,>...~>i .. I ' 't ~1 -3502 9- >'./-10. LaÂ»11%39-<Xt< L Â» TED CONTRACTOR 7~ - j 6 73>tiâ‚¬BNG FENCE TO REMAIN ' 31 2 ' ., -7,/P. 1 t 4 1\P J'ER Z.003 RDS A.3. , , , i .1 11 Â·' -1 3/4~!Alk 9-7 1 1 1 .1 --4,) ~ ~ ( ,~f; ~ Ll 1--1 1 ; EGRESS LIGHTWELL ' ~1 'll 4-: i - PER Z-003 RDS D.4 ' 0,=120'.Â· DATE OF PUBUCATION rE-12~.YVULÂ«2 ' 5 - ---48 0 4-4Â· r- 1 + 92 i j 5 1 Ila 1 6 + g*U..0.2 1 11 1 - --m 1 ' ii :1.-4.1 1 75C {11%* 75 CARAd. I beel ACCC58 -i 44 < -1.Â«L f l 4.3 94 PER Z-[,03 -; E , 41 -4.-1 : SD 9/23'14 HPC CONCEPT REV RDS C 1 '~7 ~Â·~.-3 ~~ . ~ ~ ~ * '3/'.42/ 2 + \ c f,_ fj 1,- - PROJECT NO: 1411 07 Â·- - - -<LI ALLEY 4- 3 DRAWN BY. KPT ALLEY COPYRIGHT FORUM PHI. LLC SHEET TITLE 1 PROPOSED SITE PLAN 1/8- = 1'-0 1X EXISTING SITE PLAN 1'8": 1.0 Z-003 N FULP--1 1 Clh SITE PLAN 1 4 8 16 Uj N GARMISCH STREET N GARMISCH STREET ./V-â‚¬2-- SUBGRADE CALC LEGEND ' PROPERTY LINE 1'.75 3.q It ~ SUBGPADE WALLAREA 202.75 sq It 347.50 sq 11 G (2 ~ EXPOSED WALLAREA ff 1 1 10 61 4 I 36-7 .. 1 2 9 1 ' i 1 SETBACK LINE E 715 West Main Street. Suite 204 9'-10" ~. 3 0" . 12'4 ; 3 0' ~ 2-3 , Aspen, Colorado 81611 P 970.279.4157 F 866 770 5585 1 11 1 1 zÂ· 7 i ~ 1 11 1 I 101 E HALLAM 225.25 sq ft HALLAM LLC 21'-4'.1 1 289.75 34 1 - | 101 E Hallam St - ; Aspen, Colorado 81611 . . I . - . b , 30 -6 , 1 23-8,2 -.. > 4 5 b 703 00 sq tt 1. i f 1 1 740 6 1 Ir====j 1 F i i f : - 4 -CONSULTANTS FAR PLAN LEGEND ~ ~:~ SURVEYOR 11 -- - - ----~ . i ~ â€¢ Aspen Suivey Engineers. Inc 210 S Galena Stleet ~ COUNTABLE FLOOR AREA i . Aspen, Colorado 81611 aspensurveyors@ginall corT, (970) 925-3816 ~ EXEMPT FRONT PORCH ' CIVIL TED ~_] EXEMPT' DECK 1 Existing Floor Area Calculations 11 1! h 101 E Hallam St ~ 50Â°6 EXEMPT GARAGE | MECHANICAL 1 1' TED Ex,stinp L-{}-9 Lelel Floor Area Calcu latio...............-- ~ 100% EXEMPT- GARAGE , 1 Lower Level Gross Floo Area (Sq /1 Lower Level Countable Floor Nea (Sq Ft} ! 0100 , - ... ...... - ......... :- -- ....: ..... ........... ... ... -- -- -- - ..... :i -r- STRUCTURAL i Â·,1 ., Existing Floor Area Calculations 1 652 X :1.-1 : . Â· 4.Eil c .1 1.. ,Â·,Â· Are; {50 Fh 0 00 â‚¬Â· . i Level Floor Ale/ (SQ Ft. 12- #75 Upr.el Level Floot Area (Sq Ft) 95375 Delith>orch Floor Area (Sl Ft) 0 00 1 1 1 m .--1-i : iii, &, Total Existing Ftoor Area (Sq Ft) 2,256,50 I:' Â·Â· ~ 1 ~ , P; : CONTRACTOR TBD ~2---, ~ b , t.- t 1 i. 1! ~. 1-- : 1 11 ~-:-- ~ Â£1~6 4- Proposed Floor Area Calculations ' ' i : Â· 6 9,23 201 Â·1 DATE OF PUBUCATION 101 E Hallam St , 611 1 1: m Proposed Lower Leve! Exposed Wall Catculations , . , , 1- RE,71 â‚¬ LoweT LeÂ·Â·ei VVI, label -Total Wall Area (Sq Ft) Exposed Wall Afea (Sq Ft) ~3~ --'--:=::EN:=:.=Efi ----tiff--r-- -Â·- - Â·Â·Â·-- -- --~~-C?* Pl-- Â«f) 1 202.75 0 00 . '' ' % 1 1; 1 p-J 2 347.50 000 3 14.75 000 :1 ! 4 289.75 42 00 5 225.50 0.00 : :' 1 ~ SD | 9/23/14 HPC CONCEPT REV 6 703.00 0 00 Overan Total Wit Area (Sq Ft) 1,783.25 Exposed Wall Area (Sq Ft) 42.00 PROJECT NO. 1411 Iâ€¢Iâ€¢â€¢â€¢â€¢â€¢â€¢â€¢â€¢â€¢~â€¢~â€¢â€¢â€¢â€¢â€¢â€¢â€¢â€¢â€¢â€¢â€¢â€¢â€¢â€¢â€¢â€¢â€¢â€¢â€¢uâ€¢â€¢â€¢â€¢â€¢â€¢â€¢â€¢â€¢â€¢â€¢â€¢â€¢ â€¢â€¢â€¢â€¢â€¢-â€¢â€¢â€¢â€¢â€¢â€¢â€¢â€¢u,â€¢â€¢Â·Â· % of Expcmed Wall {Sq Ft) (Exposed / Total) 2.36% (11 -Â·Â·"Â·Â·Â· Â·Â· Â· Â·Â·Â·Â· ------ --Â·Â·--Â·Â·Â·Â·Â·Â·------------- DRAWN BYA APT (3 26-9: 1 :1 Proposed Lower Level Floor Area Calculations 5 COPYRIGHT FORUM PH!, LLC Lower Level Gross Floor Area (Sq Ft) 1,652 50 Lower Level Countable Floor Area (Sq Ft) 38.92 1,652.5 X 2.36% Total Proposed Floor Area Calcutations Lower Level Floor Area (Sq Ft) 38.92 Â· : Main Level Floor Area (Sq Ft) 1300.00 I i Upper Level Floor Area (Sq Ft) 1137 25 i Deck/Porch Floor Area (Sq Ft) 0 00 - 1 SHEET TITLE Total Proposed Floor Area {Sq Ft) 2.476.17 Â© Ca (.9 UJ PROPOSED LOWER LEVEL 3/15"= 1'Â·0" NED EXISTING LOWERLEVEL Z-004 E-Lflf-1 N FLOOR AREA 148 CALCULATIONS PROPERTY LINE PROPERTY ONE 0 CD(3) 1'3 A <) FYA () (E) f f T ..11, f SETJACK LINE I I SETBACK LINE 715 West Main Street. Suite 204 1 1 Aspen. Colorado 81611 P 970.279 4157 F. 866 770 5585 1 Ill 11 III I i 1 EXEMPT FRONT PORCH , 1 EXEMPT FRONT PORCH | 101 E HALLAM | PEER RDS 226 575 020 D 5 -177 64 441 5 ~ PER RDS 26 575.020 D 5-' â€¢' 6,4 25 go 1 HALLAM LLC 101 E Hallam St 9. - ---- 1 tEl- T Â· Â· . -r- Aspen, Colorado 81611 FAR PLAN LEGEND ----- Â·Â·'-L--13**32Â£1~fa E L_.-: ...... 1-=,1 j....; ............% -1- 0 1: 1 ;i , 4 L__1 COUNTABLE FLOOR AREA i - Â· Â· 1 | | F . ..i : :A ~ EXEMPT FRONT PORCH , R ./ r--'.14 : 1 , 1 i 1 17 \9 - 0..... - 4 11- -1 1 '1 -.......... ~ EXEMPT DECK | | Lit ; 4.i_JÂ· --Â·: 1 1 1.7 : ~~ 50% EXEMPT Â·Â· GARAGEE . 11545 1- 1 IK= 1 ~_~_~ 100% EXEMPT-GARAGE ' r.-1 1 1 j E , ON L 41 1 1.11 - Aspen Survey Engineers. inc , ~ .. ~ . CONSULTANTS 2 i WI.- SURVEYOR Existing Floor Area Calculations ~ 0 - 1 210 S Salena Stieet Aspen, Colorado 81611 i (970) 925-3816 101 E Hallam St ii it: aspensurveÂ¥.sfogIT,al| COIT, CIVIL, Existing 'Â·18.': i.evel Floor Area Calculations t-- - ~ ... ...........~-......u..~ ..': ' : & 1184 75 Er- , , n TRD 1 1 V 1 11 W I lion Bi Â·. ..g Gross Cloor Area {Sci Ft) ~ 108 DO EXEMPT FRON" 1 EXEMPT FRONT PORCH L U! PORCH PER RES lulaÂ·n LeÂ·.Â·e~ Countable Floor Area {Sq Ft} 1292.75 PER RDS 26 575.020.0.5 -- ,' Â· , , A.... 26 575 020 D 5 - MECHANICAL **,sting peÂ«Porch Floof Area Calculations ~ 101 00 â€¢., D , / ' fÂ·Â·Â·Â·Â·Â· TBD ! lempt per Ti d Â· r.4 : 1Â·Â·9---- I ' 1 riÂ·-Â·-r' .-, 1./ i.r:Â· AÂ·tÂ·A (Sq Fl C'rÂ·K J nga mo 'Â· i.-,ri, U,in & Upper LeÂ· T ~ 1,55 00 351 T If Â·Â· Â·Li giess = 380 4 exempt . Â· . Deck/Forch C.lÂ·./!able Floor Area (SIA Fl) , O,00 1,-Z,~â€ž.mâ€ž-,-4 + .. ..... ... .- p:.. 1- I .... .. ......1 ..... .- - - -......... - Â«8) (EÂ»- -1- ..4 - ....... .1 .- Â· u STRUCTURAL Total Exist:i:, F iue, ~Â·.Â·.1 C.Kilbtions ~ TBD L 9." i eve, r:,3 1, AÂ· ea (So Ft 0 00 1,176.00 sq R I 1 1 vscs:,21 K ! M 10 Â· :,1 11 ,â€¢Â· wP.Â·.- Floc : .1 .9 (S< Ft; 0 00 . ::: 1 1 1 1 1 :2 , Â· Â· N CONTRACTOR Total Existing Floor Area (Sq Ft) 2256.50 11 .7 1:~ TBD 112 1 al .â€¢ 32.00.64 ft 50% EXEMPT PER 1 26.572.020 D 7 r ~- -~ i~ 9 1 1 Proposed Floor Area Calculations ~ 9/120 DATE OF PUSLICATIION 190.00 sql H , 10 1,3 1 101 E Hallam St EXISTING DECK | '~ Â·Â·Â·-Â·Â·Â·Â·Â·Â·-Â·Â· Â·- - ~ . TO BE REMOVED , i X i - P,oposed Main Level Floor Afea Calculations i ~ f.9 ) FICy --- - ~ (6) Ma n Level Gross Floor Area (Sq Ft) 1176 00 Common Building Gross Floor Area (Sq Ft) 108.00 100% EXEMPT PEE . 250.0O sq ft | L--''~ 1 -- - --- -- 26.57t.020 D 7 Main Level Countable Floor Area {Sq Ft) 1284.00 F - % 7. 71 1 1 1 / Pioposed Ga,age Floor Area Calculations Garage Gross Floor Area (Sq Ft) 282.00 , r. , . : SD 1 9.23/14 HPS CONCEP- M.Â· . Garage Countatie Floor Area (Sc Ft) 16 00 26 757 020 D 7 / \ 1 Garage Â©*unttable Floor Area (Sq Ft) 16.00 ''ll 1 /LU PROJECT NO. 1411 tyÂ»--- Â· i ti .. .... e DRAWN BY. KPT Proposad Deck/Porch Floor Area Calculations Exempt per RDS 11 1 . COPYRIGHT FORUM PHI LLC Front Porch Gross Floor Area (Sq Ft) 165.75 26 575 020 D5 : Deck Gross Floor Area (Sq Ft) (Main & Upper Levels) 250.25 15% of gross = 380 4 exempt ~ | 10~00 41 1 J' 1 I loe 1,-1 5 . E Deck/Porch Countable Floor Area (Sq Ft} 0.00 Total Proposed Flown Area Calculations - Lower Level Floor Area (Sq It) 3892 Main Level Floor Area (Sq Ft) 1300.00 || || | I 11 Upper Level F.I Area (Sq Ft) 113725 (4) 51 Deck/Porch Floo<Area (Sq Ft) 0 00 { 1 1 1 SHEET TITLE Total Proposed Floor Mea (Sq Ft) 2,476.17 0 0 22 4-7 \-/ L PROPOSED MAIN LEVEL FAR 116 - 1-0 EXISTING MAIN L.EVEL FAR 3/16" = 1--0 Z-005 12_7 1 : N FLOORAREA 1 4 8 16 CALCULATIONS PROPERTY UNE PROPERTY ONE ~ O 0 G 0 0 (63 0)â‚¬) 41 1 - .u JT ++ 11 SETBACH LINE i SETIACK LINE 715 West Mairi Street. Suite 204 i , Aspen, Colorado 81611 1 1 P 970.279.4157 F. 866 770 5565 11 1 1 101 E HALLAM HALLAM LLC 101 E Hallam St 8.#. ' .' 4-- 1 1 1.... - .................................. Â·Â·-Â·-Â·Â·;-~Â·-..~ .... .............. .. v Aspen, Colorado 81611 Ul AREA EXEMPT PER , AREA EXEMPT PER - -26 575 050 D.3 FLOOR - - 26 575 050 0 3 FLOOR 1. 1 AREA <30' AREA <30 1 - 1 kl FAR PLAN LEGEND i 1 51 K ' INn Ld COUNTABLE FLOORAREA u=Â·uÂ·- Ill . 1 . P Â·Ii L_~ EXEMPT FRONT PORCH -In: -- I . ' -1- T : : e 1 CONSULTANTS 71 1 ~ EXEMPT DECK 4 i - SURVEYOR Aspen Suivey Engineers. InG ~ 50% EXEMPT-GARAGE 1,1:' ~ 1 210 S Galena Street .. Aspen, Colorado 81â‚¬,11 1- /,4.3 Â· 7.14 r-T . ,--9 [ (970) 925-3816 I. I ~ 10096 EXEMPT GARAGE Â· : , . ~ 11 asponsurvevois@ginaii coin | 903 :t Mift 1 4 1 CIVIL TBD 43 n.j i ; ;~ ! A REA EXEMPT PER Existing Floor Area Calculations 1 1 I ..11'i I AREA EXEMPT PER !i Â· AREA <30 101 E Hallam St â€¢- 29 575 050 D 3 FLOOR , {--*.... * i . 1 MECHANICAL AREA:30" Â·--Â· TBO +â€žÂ· - 26 575.050 D 3 FLOOR 2 1 ~ Existing lipper Level Floor Area Calculation Â·. I:'Â«Â·r I. 1.'Af Gre . rloor Ar/ 59 i m '. 5 1 1 : rh 1 1~ k Upper Level Countab{e Floor Area (Sq Ft) 963?5 (E-- - --..; Â·Â· -Â·Â· Â·Â·Â· Â·Â· Â·Â·Â·Â·Â·Â·Â· Â·Â·~Â·Â·Â·Â·Â·Â· Â· Â·Â·Â·Â·Â·Â· Â·Â·.:.Â· Â·Â·Â·Â·Â·Â· Â·~ Â·Â· Â·Â·Â·Â·Â·Â·Â· Â·Â·- -Â· Â·--~--% CO--Â· Â· ------ -- Â·'~-" -' Â·-Â· '~~ ~' ""' - ~'~' '~" --"' '- ~ -'--~ ---- -~ -- - --~ ~ ~<2~> : Â·Â·Â·Â· Â·Â·Â·Â·Â·Â·Â·Â·Â·Â· Â·Â·Â·Â·Â·Â· Â·Â· Â·Â·----- iÂ·~ ' - STRUCTURAL 1 . TeD s#Deck;P.>,ch;!aor ArepOIrÂ·.c~a~,e,ns X ' ' ..1 3 ~1 1 ' T E xerry''r-QIs 1 1 1rt J 1 ,Iii c -- Ic"h Gross C:.Â·?r All:' .. f Â·' i 1,5500 . -:7 :' R- --- :: I . IÂ·Â·Â· Â· Â·--Â·uss Floor Area Â·Sq In |, 351 25 "Â·Â· of gross = 380 4 exempt . Â· i 1 2 ;ecK/Porch Countable Floor Asa (Sq Ft) ' 0.00 ' ' 1 8 161.25'qft . CONTRACTOR i Â· i i Â· Â· TBD 1 1 -hi 1 - ........... Total Existing Floo~ Area Calculations 0- 1 4 - ~--*. -- ------- -- ~-- i - - --- -- -- - - - --- !-1 - - ~ - -Â© (1.- I -- -. 2 - 12//1 FIOOr,A~a 21~/FR - Id 0 00 J Â©per Level Fiuu. Â·Â·. f 1 1Sq Ft) 95379 1 11 11 L 1 205 f 1 i-9- -T i---- Deck/Poren Floor Al. ..qf,\ 000 - 9 23 20'Â·Â· DATE OF PUBLICATION Total Existing Floor Ayea <Sq Ft) 2,256.50 04Â·< 96 - â‚¬ 1 - 34 203 207 201 Proposed Floor Area Calculations : i 1 1 101 E Hallam St It 250 25 59 # 1 + Proposed Main Level Floor Area Calculations ' SO 9,23/14 HPC CONCEPT REV Upper Level Gross Floor Area (Sq Ft) 1137.25 1 I I 1 - Upper Level Countable Floor Area (Sq Ft) 1137.25 I PROJECTNIO. 141 31- DRAWN BY: KPT Proposed Deck/Porch Floor Area Calculations 1 1 Exempt per RDS Front Porch Floor Area (Sq Ft) 165.75 26 575.020.05 1 1 1 ~ COPYRIGHT FORUM PHI LLC I i Deck Floor Area (Sq Ft) 25000 15% of gross = 380 4 exempt 1 1 1 Deckleorch Countable Floor Area (Sq Ft) 0.00 Total Proposed Floor Area Calculations 1 Lower Level Floor Area (Sq Ft) 38 92 1 1 1| Matn Level Floor Area (Sq Ft) 1300 00 Upper Level Floor Area (Sq Ft) 1137.25 Deck/Porch Floor Area (Sq Ft) 000 Total Proposed Floor Area (Sq Ft) . 1 1 - SHEET TITLE O 0 G 0 (733 x., L LP .9 PROPOSED UPPER LEVEL FAR 3/16 - 1-0 EXISTING UPPER LEVEL FAR 3'16"= 110 Z-006 UU--7 la N FLOOR AREA 14 8 M \.1/ CALCULATIONS PROPERTY LINF i ~ Â·./. Â·/ -" ~: Â·I Â· 'Â· '. f'~ Â· 9 00 44 42) 23 25-4; V . â€ž.. 4 ~ 0..*/4 tÂ·,.111*/8211 12'-71,2 1'-7- 9'-2 1 1'-1140 , 2 SETEACY LINE , 715 West Main Street. Suite 204 Aspen, Colorado 8161 1 P. 970.279.4157 F: 866 770 5Â£Â·85 101 E HALLAM HALLAM LLC 101 E Hallam St 6- --1 -EvÂ·-h Â·Â·Â·Â·~~h Aspen. Colorado 81611 1 STORAGE 009 .1 1- .. \ MECH 1~r Â¤~ 011 l, UP -1-f CONSULTANTS REC ROOM SURVEYOR r-TOPEY If PWDR w Â· Â·Â·Â· Â· 'h v g E./Â· :lers iric 1 ::Â· : L./ :,a Street , Aw, Co,orado 81611 (9/01 925-3816 'spensurveyors@ginai! coin i m Â· CIVIL 13> u, *--~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~-1-- -- ~t (33 TBD 6 1; 1 4/.1 e Nly MECHANICAL fBb (D; STRUCTURAL 1 TeD -"1 1 11 211 6 BE[ROOM ~~-] CONTRACTOR T'ED RACION Â·~EE@J=.=~Â·.1 Â·315 / , 014 (3 d:.1 â€¢,cr i -1 (D C 11 | n V I , 13ATH ' e 4- ... CLOSET 9 9 2320 DATE OF PUBCCATION # -12 '. 1 0,7 E- BEDROOM CLOSETÂ·.~ -21-2} C ID BATH A 4 1 0 /7 04 SD 9/23'4 i HPC CONCEPT REV I - :0 j 1 ---- -a- - -: 0 PROJECT NO: 1411 DRAWN BY. KP'l COPYRIGHT FORUM PH! l.1 C WALL LEGEND ~ E EXISTING WALLTO REMAIN : E EXISTING WALL TO BE RE-SIDED ~~ NEW WALL. Â· SHEET TITLE . O 0 4) 46 0 6 ri VVALL TO DEMO Z-101 PROPOSED LOWER LEVEL 3~'16" m 1'Â·C NO EXISTING LOWER LEVEL EL[lf--1 N 1 4 8 16 FLOOR PLANS .,LEE .,6-,OZ PROPERTY LiNE PROPERTY UNE 9 6, .9 Gh (i) 1 44/ 10 T I T 12'-7~" 1Â·-f 19-- 1.11 f i . 12'-7'Â° 1-7". L 9-2" 1'-11"' . SETEACR LINE SETBACK UNE 715 West Main Stree[ Suite 204 Aspen. Colorado 81611 11 1 P 970 279 4157 F 866 770 5585 - -1-----fil-il 11 .0-2-72 9-3 1-345 I 101 E HALLAM 1 1 11 11 11 1 1 HALLAM LLC â‚¬*11 1.- 4 1. ................. - .._... _.~ ......... ....... . -,--_.. - _ .-A elk h_M'~~-i -e Â·Â· --Â·Â·Â· - -Â·-Â· - -Â·Â·Â·Â·Â· Â· - Â·Â·Â·Â·Â· Â·Â·Â·Â·-Â·Â· - Â·-Â·Â·Â·Â·Â·Â·4 F ~ 101 E Hallam St Aspen. Colorado 81611 1 1 -- -:g .1-d 4 11 1 175, ,-2-F 1 + UVING lot -- 1 - $ ; HI -+35 IN -1 r---1 ,/-- ~ ukÂ·---I*e : ' 1 L-- CONSULTANTS 1 T-] E 1 Y-r 114 --2- P SURVEYOR Aspen Sur,ey ErginJelÂ¥ InE 1 ~413 i E 1 1 1 7 210 S Galena Stleet Aspen Colorado 81611 ' aspensurveyofs@?ginail coli r-1 P~DR 11{) It 111 4 K 3 - CIVIL L.........._ 1 , 1 L 1----- Il---- TBD 1!: 24# 1 ---L ' 11 DIFING ! ' 11 0 6===P.= .31 1 ,â‚¬ i Ir=Â«-4 1 11 0 644 2 1 I | < |~ -' ' 10. MECHANICAL El[ 4 4 ' 3 U -) ---2 i 1 h { 1 - 1 . /1 'F- -- 1 EXTERIOR VJALLS ~~ STRUCTURAL 1-7 NORTH OF LINE IS 1 ~ 0-,X 1 426=q.1/-,--hi 1 ---- -_1 1 KITCHEN U _~ EXISTING TO REMAIN i~ :, i Â»f I{ P' ' 11 TBD L' 1 1 1 i p 7=ill 103 - PANTRY SEE ELEVATIONS . 11 11 11 10 ~ I#~| ~11 104 i Z-201 & 2Â·202 <0 1.: 111 b P -Ell*Â» - : TrÂ·-1 --.- 1 L - -61 / 1 1 i TBD r'.Ch 3-7= 1Â· 1-1'___- _t_;~_ --_ _ -p-j .... 1 11 ". lADON t P./ DEMO- L -- e --j 1Â« 1 11 DEMO---~ ~ 923231Â· .rEOFFÂ·JELICAn LLAUNDRY,MUDROOM~ | 100 U 10 I 3 ! 1 1 4 3 !1 4 DEMO --9\ I , 1 Lj M. i F- -Â· 7 i ' BO' 1:1 --- 1--- r 1 L 4 (970) 925-3816 -n 1, 11 '+ b . TBD il It 1 - 1 1 , CONTRACTOR r 1 1 ./: 14 9 11 SD 9/21/14 HPC CONCEPT. REV. 100 ~ 50 1 1 1 --- 1.-~ 'EELâ€ž----_ PROJECT NO. 1411 LFÂ»Â» -Il -l Al DRAWN BY. KPT 1 I dll 1 -' Â®MMON COPYRIGHT FORUM PHI. LLC COMMbN I WALL LEGEND BUILDING ~ i ~| BUILDING 1 11 ~_~~_~ EXISTING WALL TO REMAIN J 1 1 1 11 ~ EXISTING WALL TO BE 1 1 1 11 1 RESIDED I ~_~ NEW WALL Ch (i) 4.3 SHEETTITLE 4-2 (12 (2. 133> ll.; ~ 22 U U -9-=T il WALLTODEMO PROPOSED MAIN LEVEL 3/16" = 1'.0 EXISTING MAIN LEVEL 3/16 = 1-0 Z-102 77-1 I m FLOOR PLANS N 1 4 8 16 U) 28'-4 12'4" ~-2.1 ' PROPERTY LINE %:1....'..' ,Â·.;/ PROPERTY LINE fÂ·Â· Â·:~ Â·Â·'. '*: 1 : @) CO +44 01 ) (T. -.-.... 25'11' T V 1 1 1 1 1 1 12'-7' 1-7'~ -, 9-217 1Â·-11~Â£' . , 1 SETWACK LINE , SETBACK LINE 715 West Main Street. Suite 204 i i Â· , Aspen, Colorado 81611 1 P. 970.279 4157 F. 866 770 5585 1 1 1 1 i 1 1 1 , 101 E HALLAM ,1 , | ' HALLAM LLC 11 1 1 4, 101 E Hallam St 11 . 1 " 1, V -/, Aspen, Colorado 81611 1 1 1 It <,2 1 1 ' 4 CLOSET 1 BEDROOM, r 1 ==-I ' LE=== r 12.7, 1 1 ' 1/ 6 4 4 , ~i. r.,t:, 210 t..:f~1 1 [- M BATH VOW**b--A=~j -1-= 42 1 1 L . 0,24 11 f 1 11 liLi . 1 1 1,--/1 ' CONSULTANTS 91 1 -7- i 9 Lili ~ SHOWER . 2 ;0 S (1 i i i, , 3tieet SURVEYOR Ati Â·n';.4 Â·v,:ig:Ilâ‚¬f:,5 18'C Aspen, C.-, orado 81611 (970) 925-3816 ~ ~_ : / <-====-S 7/----1 11 V , ~/ 1 8 asperisurveyors@gmail coin It -2 1 1, 1 ---' 2-2,4 1 1 -CIVIL. 1 TBD -~1 h--2-3 Â«i) 11 -0-731 / CLOSET j | 111 Iii MASTER BATH ~" 20 11 12 --fisty---- MECHANICAL ' I j : r ! n -1 ' 3 + 4 - 7,6#- -JZ:-1722__~ e- ---1--------- ....... >4...........4 .------i: 1 ,-2 CLOSET | 1 0 EXTERIOR WALLS NORTH OF LINE IS | , 11 STRUCTURAL --1------9 22Â· I 11 TRD - - - EXISTINGTO REMAIN - 71 . SEE ELEVATIONS Z 201 & Z.202 1 11 UIb-Cp-CE. 1 I E - 2 CONTRACTOR 1 11IWI~ J i JBD 11Â·Â· Â· Â·Â·Â·~C'''t'.~Â·- ------ --- ----- - --- --- --D of -- - --1-~~ , #1 ---Â· ....... . .-- ..-. __ ._ii> 1 jl 4,/, 1 1 I DEMO-'~ L UASTER BEDROOM , 7 | 1 234 ~ 1 200 , ./.0Â·Â·Â· lATEDFPUBLICATÂ·104 i ; LINE Of | i ~A~E ~ 1_../.0 1 u IJ. , 1-1---~-- v (RH LfiA ... / 204 . 203 202 204 ' 1 1 11 11 I ' . SO 9,2.Â·Â·14 i HPC CONCEPT REV ~ ROOF DECK 11 1 1 Â· PROJECT NO: 1411 Et---- DRAWN BY. APT COPYRIGHT FORUM PHI LLC 11 1 11 - WALL LEGEND i E 1 i 11 ~ EXISTING WAi-LTO REMAIN El RE &IDED | TING WALLTO BE ~ | | i Lij NEW WALL. SHEET TITL. E 1 ]1 16 r.36) 434 .-'..... 0 00 17 0 6) ~| WALLTO DEMO PROPOSED UPPER LEVEL EXISTING UPPER LEVEL. 3/16 = 1Â·-0" Z-103 3/16" = 1Â·ID}' 1[U----1 1 <14 FLOOR PLANS N 148 _ -eÂ«3 10'-81.7 R.....C L .39'A PROPERTY LINE PROPERTY LINEE :.I:.b ./ i li U - rly . ...,4 (4) (5) IT\ rE>~ 5) 0 .4. ?%41 % 1 1 1 ***#8 Z :Â· a SETEAC, 1 INF i SETBACK UNE I 715 \,Vest Main Street. Suite 204 , , Aspen, Colorado 81611 1 11 P 970.279 4157 F. 866 770 5585 EXISTING FEAT ROOF 1 L 1 ELOPE D FAR DRA:NAGE 101 E HALLAM HALLAM LLC 1 1, 101 E Hallam St 5..... - -.... --- -I -..<D < -' --- - ---- - -- Â·Â· -Â· -Â·Â·- Â·---- -Â·-Â·Â· - -Â·-Â·â‚¬F) - Aspen, Colorado 81611 ' ' -1-NFIB ~-ily- i -212] i It 41 ...7 tly '2k - -~&51!NOFOOF : U~ TO REMA.1, 1 11 1 11 illuy 6 / 1 $ 11 r /2 LE-Er / \ \4 / / CONSULTANTS 1 1 4 SURVEYOR A ..t.n Guive LÂ·Â·Â·uÂ·:,ters. Inc 210 S Galena .-1, eel Aspen. Colorado 81611 (970) 925-3816 aspensurveyors@ginail coin . CIVIL TBD 4 A 9,24 Ati M . . 2/ . - 1 + TBD 49 -/ MECHANICAL 0 -2 -- W-1 (8)-1...................~~..4Â·(D 1 ---- EXTERIOR WALLS I STRUCTURAL i NORTH OF LINE IS TBD 1.... EXISTING TO REMAIN i IZWROOC SEE ELEVATIONS 1 |1 1 'r sLOPED FOR DRAINAGE Z 201 & Z 202 1 1 j LiNE OF 2 , - DEMO CONTRACTOR : Uâ€¢PER LEVEL 1 ' .Â·~fip] FiI.1- TB D 11 11 1 (51 ".. ... ...- --- -- .....- - -i) : W $ - 111 - 1 1 -- , 0,21'20'Â·: DATE D. PUBLICATION 1 1 1 -- !.2 \ 1 1 : (El (0 ' LROD. DEcKs~o,~r i i FOR DRA..AGE ~ 1 1 1 ~ NEW RO?OF DECK ~ I SLOPED FOR DRAINAGE 1 1 1 1 SD 9/23/14 HPC CONCEPT. REV |' 1 ' 10 REMAIN ~ PROJECT NO: 1411 1 1 EXES]INGROOF 1 - (fÂ« i.1- - -t- - Â«-t â‚¬4-- - -' DRAWN BY: APT 1 11 1 COPYRIGHT FORUM PHI LLC ROOF LEGEND 6221 1 1 1 1 4[9 1 ~ EXISTING ROOF TO REMAIN 1 1 1 1 U NEW METAL ROOF | 11 1 /~ I : SHEET TITLE ~__~ NEW ROOF DECK O ne Zix 1 L-1 11 r r (-4 Ar. 3 4~ 32 6 i 1 ROOF TO DEMO PROPOSED ROOF PLAN 3/16"= 1'.0 EXISTING ROOF PLAN 316 , 1 -0 Z-104 N 1 : ROOF PLAN 1 4 8 16 ~ ----- r A G: (13(3 68 11 13@5 e Â® f F 1 T T YI T 17 1 '/E'BAIK LINE @ ; ~. 1 1 442~< | 1 S.l;TIll El P . 252Â·1Â¥A *0.4;*0Â·Â·&1 PROPERTY LINE @ 11 1 1 ..6 HEIGHT LIMIT PROPERTY LINE@ 1 1 , ~ Â· PROPERTY LINE @ EAETELEV -4 t NORTH ELEV 'K L.INE @ _ _~ _. ~ ~ SETEACk LINE @ SETBACK LiNE @ 26 FEET :TZ: 7.. -_.... - '.--- l - ....% i --.. ... i -..I ..... -. _--... .... - - -~.. 715 West Main Street. Suite 204 I i 1 - R.6 HEIGHT LIMIT Aspen, Colorado 8 tâ‚¬1 1 -~RIDGE SEE WEST El.Ev i ~ ~ -25 FEE. T P 970.279.4157 F. 866 770 5585 1 1 11 1 1 1 SH./ . 202 FOR 9 /~ 18 ' 01 |ECZ-20 FOR ' I ' HEIGHT 1 1 13. 1.IMON-FROM 4 \\P 1,3 POIN I FROM | 1,3 POINT FROM i C 1 d~ .brf). 1 5 *1 18 PoiN. FROM EAVETO RICOL -3 5/ hy \~ ' EAVE TO RIOGE EAVE TO RIDGE ' 1 \ 1 EAVETORIDGE | 11 l ' 1 1 .OPOINT FROM 101 E HALLAM \\ 2,1 1 1 EAVE TO RIDGE HALLAM LLC I ik*EAVE -g'ZArAY , 1/3 PONT FROM 1'3 FKMNIFROM 1 1 I ~l... --__ _- __ ..._ -1.... -- -{Â·Â· I Â·Â·- - I fi~Ilit[1]~ IÂ·-- -~- 1 1'1 & / i E.AVE ToRIDGE 101 E Hallam St fAe TO RiDGE : '1 1 1 1 | / 1 4 Aspen. Colorado 81611 ~. RIDGE q TO' MOST PORTION * 1 ~ | . OFSTRL;CTi,9Â£ 17~11:jii , i:,1 , ,I- IL 1. ' 1 El- -OF 3TRUCTURC TOO MOST FOR-1014 i ,,su- ~ P . 14 1 *AM- |~ 1/3 POINT RCÂ©?DECKSLOPED__1[i:,Â·~i i 11~t' - _ FLAT /07 SLOPED 1 /0/ DRAINAGE 1 1. 1 t .4)*EAVE1 1,j POINT FROM 16// ~ FROM. FOR DPA NAGE - | 1 r 'FOR DRAÂ»NAGE TOP MOST PORT CN . ; I '[ 1.:~ ' 1-_2 i LjÂ·~ETO ROGE ~ 7/ LIVE TO . i ' i OF STRUCTURE Â¢, 4 .DGE ' --- Â·Â· Â·Â· I I . Â·Â·Â·Â·Â·Â·Â·Â·Â·3=------~'~ ~~~~~~~~~~~~~ ~ 1~FeE:43 1 1 11 r l , i ' - a 1 l: til' :i-t ~ IL.H,W wp M 1 0 1 I 1 1 1- 1 1 1 1 11 : ' |i 1 1 11 1 1 CONSULTANTS SURVEYOR Aspe.n SirÂ·.Â· Eng fiee'.finE 210 S Gakiia Street Aspen, Colora<jo 81611 (970) 9253816 aspensurveyois@ginall coin CIVIL TBD MECHANICAL TBD 2X EXISTING EAST ELEVATION 3,16" = 1'Â·0 1X EXISTING NORTH ELEVATION 3/16" = 1'-0 STRUCTURAL m 0% 99 T ..E of ADDITiON ~ 1 1 IJ 1 & RENOVATION EXISTING CHIMNEY I | â€¢ | 1 GETSACK -INE * SOUTH ELEV PROJECION 7.0 B.M./m PROPEl[YLINE@ 1| t | PROPO'iED 1 1 PE>2657502 5 .A | ADD:Di ION & ' E)<TER:]R i R-6 HEIGHT.MIT PROPERTÂ¥ L:IE e I | | | | 1 PRO'-7- .INF @ EAST ELEV |Â· 2 NORTH ELEV T NOR .â€¢ SETBACK 1.11.2 @ + RENO)VATiON i , REMAIN . 1 .-6 HF riT LIM:T EKIEkiop | j EXISVINGTO -4- Â· 1| i...----- ..- -7 .9...-..--.----.*..._ EAG: ELEN ' 25 t~_ ~ CONTRACTOR st: I ' .'; D '' 1 i W J i /11 1 1 1 7 PO,Nl FROM F! AT ROOF SLOPED SEE V.EST El EV EAVETOR.GE n FORDRAINAGE 0 1"1 ' 110 ~ . SHEET 2-202 FOR PROFOSED --w- 13 TOP MOST PORTION 1 1 1 | ~ | 1 b | Yb 1. STANDING SEAN HEIGHT , Er .1.....AKE POOF ~--0/STRUCil;$2' mi 1 ~ ..1.j// 1.J F.-~ 1 PPOPOSED ~i 1'3 POiNT FROM 14 // 1,3 POINT FROM 0 7 w..8 | j__g '9 5 17.- SHIÂ· Â· r . # 1 EAVE TO RIDGE -1 / EAVE TO RIDGE rf I EAVE TO RIDGE. ~ 1--Â· u ..10Â»ja HOR,ZONTAl 6: ., 1 , -----L -44 -- 1 1 1 / \4.4 - 6 I --_.2-47 -- sl.kiNED(LED,AR , 123 POINT FROM 11 SIDING 4 TOPMO,STPORTÂ·ON b<*EAVE -ic,1 Â·. . ., ~ 1'3 PO:NT FROM 9,23201Â·: DATE Of PUSLIAT1Â¢ON EAVE % IDDGE 1 ...TRUCTURE - 7 11 i, FAÂ·.7 10Â· /Â·t.6.Â· 1/3 POiNT FROM .......SE -- i ROOF DIECK SECOFED ~ FOR DRAINAGE -1 \,~t 1 - i-]I IFf,fil-~- li : I 11* / : EXISTING CEDAR ' S'iNGLE FLAT ROOF 6LOPED _ 1 11 1 11 - 1 TOP MOST PORTION FOR DRAHNAGE ' 1/3 PC:,INT PROM 167>' /~ li Fim : ~ 1 7 1 , 1 1 R 111 ; FOR DRA:NAGE -rop MosT PoR TION T -'-t - '- 'r I ..- uzz=rt FLAT Roof 5.OPED r 4 1 ~| r - ' EXISTING CEDAR EAVE TO RIDE.E -// . 8 k N Â· OF STRUCTURE 1 , Â·Â· ' I r ~ ~ ~-~ SHAÂ· E \El ..05 4 i .4 1' Â· I 1 - , 11 3% 1 4. 1 1 1 FACACE i Fl' ~ {Elt. 1 1 . EXISTING BRICK .. , L-11 1 , 1 1 , 4---A? , 111 111 . so 9,22141HPC CONCEPT REV 1,1 , FACADE 111 11 i Illi!111 lili: 1 liltiI [111111 1 1 W 1 11"1 1, T 4 1 1 PROJECT NO: 14 M | |215; M 1'111"': Fil '~--Â·]Â·Â·Â·~:' ~. ~, DRAWN BY KPT T EXISTING|HÂ·"Lic FRONT 1 1 EXISTING SIGÂ·FET-0/ENTED COPYRIGHT FORUM PHI. LLC 11 li 111 1 1 L- FORCH T* HE,1/\IN L- PRING;5',4 W,30* rO REMA*. I PER Z..3 RDS :1 B PC R Z 003 RU 0 3 B ' :!t li 111 1 DIS1 NGSTREETÂ·ORENTED I~~ -6-8"ENTRANCqTOUEMAIN 1 1 1 1 1Â· PERZOOBRIS/1 1 1 1 1 111 1 111 1 11 1 1~ 11 1 1 1 .1 1 11 1 11 11 1 1-- -1-~ --- 1 ' 1 :1 1 -------------' I '. 1 1 1 1 SHEETTITLE 1 1 ~ 1 1 1 1 11 1 Z-201 ELEVATIONS 2 PROPOSED EAST ELEVATIONI 3/le= 1-0/ 1 PROPOSED NORTH ELEVATION 3/16 1'Â·0 HEIGHTS il) 6.'A (7 (,0 T f Â® 1 7 1 1 6.3.1 I TI IT f 11 I SET8ACk L:NE @ , SO 'TH El EV *1..... i r PROPERâ„¢Lit,E@_i | 1 2 PROPERTY LINE * PROPERTY:LNE @ T SOUTH E.EV S~18ACKLINE@ _, | 1 --FROM F EA~. LTD RICOE I ~I I.EST Elli -. 715 West Main Street. Suite 204 -L HED~- LIMiT SOUTH ELEV -- - - , ; * RIDGE R-6 HEIGHT LIMIT Aspen, ColoiÂ·ado 8161 1 25 FEET 1< 1 12A.N t~ 25 FEET P. 970.279.4157 F 866 770 5585 | 12 SHEET 2-2. 231*2- ,Â·r~- /~76. 9 gulun SEE WES [ ELF. V ~ 1/3 PONT FROA111,Â·BPOIN- FROM -4-1.2 r+--=iN~ 1,6 POINT FROM |51_,,ok , 1/ PONT FROM FOP HEIGHT 111 / | EAVE TO R]DGE -1 i ~ EAVE TO RrOGE 1 - - -4 - -8- EAVE TO RIDGE EAVE TO RIDGE 3.4, - -t/le -Ii|4 Â·,- -i~ 1 7 .8 1 1 1 1,3 POINT FROM ~ 1-,r 'â€¢. FRO,Â·1 Fr> 8 \ 11 11-91~EAVE 101 E HALLAM , - ; ' 1,5 POIN- FROM , A 1 1 1 / I I- ' I . HALLAM LLC \J 1,1 ITI F>\ 1 432<. 4-EAVEI..., L-- 1 1.14/ EAVE To ACOE EAVE TO RIC</ '0 MINT FRCM Ter- -1 7- 101 E Hallam Sl ~Â«lit=Â»21; LI]i! . Aspen, Colorado 81611 TOP /06 r poRTION | | TOP; MOST PORTION IM , ~ laed' A=1 : ' 1 1 _iRIDGE 1 1 1 1-1 7. 3 POINT IICI OF STRUCTURE - 1 1:1.!14 11.1.1 'I!]Illillit ;ii 1 E-7 /4 d illi, 1:, : 'R~:LAFâ‚¬Â·+2~=N':my:,48"i;Â· 0 , 1 Â· F- EAVE TO RIDGE OF STRUCTURE 1Â·3 POINT FROM 15/ / \ 44 1|Â·I Â·Â·. URE FOR DRAINAGE 1 1 1 EAvE TO RIDGE -1// i Â· EAvt-TO Â· L<GL *29*~ t h,k~ :1....r. 11 1 1,1.!...1....1....11.: .Ul - ~ 16-'' ~4-_ 1 _ _ - 1, i 1 1-1 b : - p 20, \ I 1,1, ebr F. s 111 ! .__. /4/ %14 ; .1 4- M .1 1/== |' t rilll 1 3 I -1 -- T i I- f- 1 =11 . 11 . 1 1. 4 1 1! 1.- tl i! 1 [1?11 11 11. :11 01 1:* 11Â«1 1:-03 '[ i q ~ fl , a l 04 1 1, 1 1-=1 1 1 1 1 111 1 1!Ilit !1, " J mil 1 1Â» i l'J JLL L=,1 i i,'~i A- i ' I.'1,! 1 .1 14 1. 1 L -1-J i 11 1 1 11 ~ 1 1 1 1 CONSULTANTS SURVFYOR As' i eurvey E:,c:neers, Ine 210 S Gai,Dia Stieel Aspen, Colorado 81611 (970) 925-3816 aspensurveyofs@gina,!.coiT) CIVIL TBD MECHANICAL TBD 4X EXISTING WEST ELEVATION 3/16"= 1'-0" 3X EXISTING SOUTH ELEVATION 3/16.= 1% 0 STRUCTURAL 9 (0 0 0 m 39 9 9 TBD f i seÂ·reACK LINE @ V : f il , LINE'FADDITION MI ELE' Â· 1 4 3- ~-~ PROPERTY LINE @ I ./0.--- INE@ 1 & RE.....N PROPERTY.INE@ - 1 1, Su. .., SETBACK LINE I EXTERIOR : PROPOSED x ,/57 ELE' SOUTH ELiev i li WALLS A.D.TION & 2 26-8.....2 @ 1 1 .ESTELE.V ~ EXIS ~ 1'01 E;.1-ERIOR SOUTâ‚¬ ELEV ~ ~~ " ' "~~~ CONTRACTOR 1 | ~ RIC)GE REMAIN 1 RENOVATION , -T - - RI NE]GHT LIAIWT ~ I 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 4.!6 HEIGHT LIMIT 25 FEET 25 FEE' TBD - 1 1 1 I SEE WEST ELE. i !1 SHED 6202 PROPOSED PR(Â»OSF.D Sl AND:NO -I- ..4.---- -_ L_ STAN.iNG.EAM SEAM ROOM FOR HEIGH 1 EXISTING CEDAR EAVE TOI.DGE 1 3 POINT FRODI 1.J POINT FROM . : 1 3 PO!IT FROM ~ 1 ~ 11~r-~ L ~ F EAV=TO RIDGE | 1 EAVETO RIDGE I Rom SHiNGLE 3. 4 Â»11 I |7.-8 1 1 PROPOSED HORIZONTAL ' 1~ I HORPONTAL C 1,3 POINT FROM rft/h<% . ./ , A i ll. 1.6 POINT FROM 6- STAINEDÂ·CEDAR SIGNG 1~ POINT FROM E STAINEDIEDAR ~M~ 1 .12/\.1. 1 SLD:NEO 9,23/201Â· DATE OF PUBLICATIIDN EAVE-fORIFT. EAVE TORIDGE 1/ j . i //f 1731 IF=Il ..31 U-'Avi.TORIDGE kpi:~ 1 -1, 111 L '41/7 1---~ - -.: I 7-11F-1- 1 I~ | 1 || __' DIST:NG 'HAKE Le L N JI la 1 i.il i V i 2 1 1 7 2 111 1 .11 EXPFTIN(GCEDAP - rt----=* -1.7 --2-2---~-- Tr- *-T--**b 1 ./.0 1,3 POINT FROM SHINGLE #~ 41 . 1 Of S FRUCTURE ~, 11 L 1 - 4 1 ROM . - i EAV'E TO RIDGE 7 1RIDGE 11 11% Iii 11 i -,01 , I TOP MOST PORTION I Â¢ 1 " ~ i roP MOST POR TIC,N 111 11Â· Â·Â·Â·- . H - L IC REIGE :6 POINT FRUM *5/=UPED _L- - 1 t - 4- OF .STRUCTURE g .: Â·1: : ..tÂ· :.8 , i 1 1,3 'INT FRC _TOPMOSTPORTION-_ -I./=1.. I 2/-' ~ \,~16 1~FON-FRow FLAT ROOF SLOPF. D 041. jr 1-t=-1.-(~--=~E: 1 ' 1 -6 1 , r-~- - EAVE: To /100 1 1 -LER Â·- -FS,RUCE'-RE 9=--=r - -- 159' \~~AVE TO RUDGE FOR DRAINAGE T ! E A & , Ill : W i L=j] 1 #5~G BRLCK 1-Eli . 1 1 1 PROPOSED ~ ~~L ~~ 4 Iii ~91 Â·I. 1 6.1 1 | HORIZONTALE f 4 :~ _-~' . I.- ~ 1 1 /I 1 + ~| ' ~t SD 9/23/14 HPC CONCEPT REV '00211 5 ;~'/ i ~ STAINED CEDAR 1 *1 . 11 .... i r-7, 1 ' 1[.411 { 11. i lit 1-2, 1 ~Ill----1 -:=-:-:1~174([210 -~ n " PROJECT NO: 1411 1 1 I il:h 'li 1 1 Ill ~:1 lt, DRAWN BY. KPT - 1 I i 1 '-_8-' . 11 1 1 1 11 EXISTING STREET-OR:ENTED EXISTINiC El'REET-ORIENTED 1 ~ COPYRIGHT FORUM PHI LLC - PRilciPAL \UNDOO'Â£ 10 R EMAIN i LS 8Â·EN [RANG'. TO R EMAIN i ~ GAR AGE ~ I | PER 2 -*3 IDS ., 3 B PER Z-003 Rbs D 1 i PER Z â‚¬)03 R.3 C 1 11 1 1-----1 i i . 1 1 , il I â€ž SHEET TITLE Z-202 4 PROPOSED WEST ELEVATION 3/16 = 10' 3 PROPOSED SOUTH ELEVATION 3/16" = 1-0 ELEVATIONS HEIGHTS PROPERTY LINE PROPERTY LINE f) (3 , 3 <1. 01 43 715 West Main Street. Suite 204 64*JA.,WhiiNAÂ·.2Â·: AÂ·, SETEjACY LINE | | | SETEACK LINE Aspen, Colorado 81â‚¬11 P. 970.279 4157 FÂ· 866 770 5585 1 EXISTING FLAT POOF F ..OPED FOR DRAINAGE 4-9 1 1. 1 1 101 E HALLAM A HALLAM LLC E E 101 E Hallam St (f>..... Aspen. Colorado 81611 ie-~ .--+ 2 11. 0- 15'. . 15 2 11 ' -3923 --- FiÂ·~- ' 1 -Â·ELE 2 16 3 '-9 : \ ; 4.1 - -EfEl 8 0- EX;STING FOCI= 13.24 Ll'212/ P----.-- .0 REMAIN ' 11 fii'f EXISTI~ G CH Mt EY 1 - 1 TOÂ· REK AN 18 C 1-2< id 111, 4Â®1 5 \ [_1 10. 117 1 / 715 j/ 1 16-ff CONSULTANTS LE] 1 9 :El}lj 9 a SURVEYOR 1 - . Aspen Sup i v LI, iÂ·IiÂ·Â·ers Int ld-,9 A 7 1 .Â·Â·Â· .. 11 ,e.~g '> ~ I 4 - -4-:- ... 1 Aspen, Colorado 81611 < _ I r.-18Â·19' 210 S Gak !,a Stit:.1 (970) 925-3816 i i aspensurvevors@ginall coin | ii 1 | CIVIL - TRD 164.--73\ I 16Â·$ J4 1 I 1. 41 11' 7 4 7' 121 I -fu li 1 Ch 1 & rEF-IFf Ath 4 Oncy MECHANICAL 16Â·%- 1Â¢/ ty :16'4-*':1-/ Ve 1 17 TBD - IIi 1 1 49.- ~_ EXTERIOR WALLS NORTH OF LINE IS i | 1: STRUCTURAL TBD EXISTiNG TO REMAIN T NEW ROOF SEE ELEVATIONS ,~ SLOPED FOR DRAINAs[ : 2-201 & 2-202 1 8.13 ' i i 1 11 11 1 1 ~ 1 LiNE OF 1 , | 12 13.~ i i -Â·--Â·Â·--Â·Â·Â·-Â·Â·Â·Â· Â·Â· DEMO CONTRACTOR i UPPER i EVED TBD 1 1.---- 1 . 1 1 1/-10-3 > 19.9.4-0 t DEMOÂ·--Â·I ' DEMO-Â·--_23 -1 9 23,20.-1 [ATE Of PUELICATION 20'.1 ~/ 1 I 13 ttig I ' 14 04Â·Â·Â·Â·Â·El 1 --"~----- -- I '1 n I r. (R- _ -4- tri .., . 1 ~ L_ROOF DECK SU>PEr FOR DlAiNAGE 1 1 r ber#:RmINAGE L 14 SD 9Â·'. -;1" 1-" 2 CONCEPT REV ./ 4 EXIEING IICI PROJECT NO: 1411 , r'~~ TO REMAIN 1 1 . Il DRAWN BY: KPT R.Â·-4 1 M 15 l[jiE] ' COPYRIGHT FORUM PHI. LLC 16 rn 1 16 , ili'-12] 1 1%19 1 9..0 3,4. U - i -1. L- 11 0 /~n'.1 44 O SHEET TITLE (4 2 e ') Lic, 19 PROPOSED ROOF TOPOGRAPHY 3.16 - 1 -0 EXISTING ROOF TOPOGRAPHY 3/16" = 1'Â· 0 Z-203 7_7-3 Im N HEIGHTS OVER 148 16 41/ TOPOGRAPHY t 715 West MIr: Striet Suite 204 Aspen, Colorado 81611 P 970 279.4157 F 866 770 5585 101 E HALLAM HALLAM LLC 101 E Hallam St Aspen, Colorado 81611 4 A . 1 f -; 1- GE#-- I Â· ' 9,Â·'4. 1 -J Â£ ver-Â· '/ '../1'lf'.741 ... 1,-- I. ....:..1.. 1Â»4?,4. 45 9 5. 1 ' 4/ CI I Uv il . 1 . I CONSULTANTS L. 2~.I.1 .' Â·'42 â€¢.5 ...*,11..:44.*,1. 1, . . 1.-~ -vt..-- ~--'it./615: :-><~ *119 - /Â«Â£..3~ ir //0 210 S Galena Stteet .SURMEYOR Waia $ Aspen Survey Eng,Uers.iii'(I , Aspen, Colorado 81611 (970) 925-3816 aspensurveyofs@ginall com f' .:, t.- - 412; '6 --' . g - TBD 41 lili .M> 1 ' I Â· , . 1 -4 11 . 2 11; U b Â·7 Â·, 7 MI94.. ' 7 7 :21>T_ -I-~ -- 1 f..... u 1 -6 4 !. 6 4 1 -1 4 .....c_ Ell Ir-=u_. ~ _ 1 9 5 --9 1 i Â·Â·~ â€¢ -- --- -- MECHANICAL Â¥Â£.L-:-r----445r=>c --r,Â·;â€¢Â·:+*Drub~-4.Â·:44.41Â·:u=.=rf-.1.cÂ·-c,-cÂ·.ca.m i.~Â·clÂ£4;*4' . .- -- -1.-- : 11 TBD 1. c I.Â·6,1, 1~! ~T,I 'rd .; ' ItÂ·~41.-. L ., '. '4-_ i iL-Ud;1 -lite 44.-%. , ./ 1/ il,I.:':.1.:1 1 i F ....,1 UN.: i 4 , . . i STRUCTURAL :TBD ~* ==- CONTRACTOR TBD PROPOSED WEST FACADE REV PROPOSED SOUTH FACADE REV W . rt).idi -".Â§ a ..Â·AFf i Â¥ 0 N 23201 : DATE OF PUBLICATION - . 21,9.- ....../ '11 1 1 V ...F 1 , 1 :7 b , -- Â·Â· , -f 0. - 14, 2.1 I ka . 1 .) .1 ' c '. . :. 9Â·f Â·1. f., so ~ 9.43/14 ~ "HPC CONCEPT REV Â· 4' Â· PROJECT NO: 1411 I :'- I 7â€žhi ... 1%; ./ /.. . . ./ *4. vt 1 1 151 11-1 9: ~I,â€žfr- .' '4*fl, V 2 DRAWN BY KPT ~--------./.:- --- --- --- - -- ----- U,-L 1 ... i ..2.4 1 - 0,144 Cirt..1 '335 (f..it'.:.'::4/ AmIDVE517L1-T- FORUM PHI. LLC : ' ..... 1 ..... L 010 Â·4.44'....Â· ~ ' '--, 'r 11 1 lililit mi illititi~irr~,64 7.- :m62Â· ' ~ ,~ *. 11% W.*' I b - Â·Â·Â·4~1-!,ki:~tÂ·-'ff--;t.~:i,I,1.ji;l~ijdn-:i:*Â·ir.,lrÂ¢i rHÂ· 1.1 :1 1,- 1 -4â‚¬4...IL 14.2 1 '7 / 8-41 - /: /1 - SHEETTITLE '*FwmHMAJFVLGALWURIP f -- 1 ; - -- ~ 9 4.4,4.4.=.4+4 E- '1.#intlilL,du:a,id 11. f lilli; Iril " -i Z-204 PROPOSED PROPOSED EAST FACADE PROPOSED NORTH FACADE REV FACADES .rvt ;: /. '' ~ i 7 1 + 3 me Am G T T T 11 T T T *- k 1 1 1 lili 1 715 West Man Streel Suite 204 i , Aspen, Colorado 81611 i Â· P 970 279.4157 F. 866 770 5585 1 1 1 4 1 1 1 11 1 1 1 1 11.Off\\ 111 11 1 1 It / 1 1 1 11 1 11 1 21/ 12,~ /4 1 1 101 E HALLAM 1 1 . 1 11 1 /A 1 1 HALLAM LLC ~ /21/ 1~17 1 111 101 E Hanam St i 1 1 Aspen, Colorado 81611 1 - - - 11 I 4 111 i 4.i, 1 .1 1.--] 1 1 / 1 / 1 1 1 10] 1 ~ - ' Lf:;.111 x 3 1 1 1 11 [ 1 ........ ...44-'... in Â«Â·n : 1 1 0 04 ffÂ·-~Â»933.4 if i 1 i b .1 A j 4/ 11 . 41 1 . 1 11=1 , Â®n: 1 1 1 1 1 Illlili Ill.-; -=JL i , 11 CONSULTANTS SURVEYOR Asier SurveÂ·. 2.- Â·i.,L'ers mo I i | | 210SSalena Stlâ€¢...1 1 1 1 1 1 1 Aspen. Colorado 81611 (970) 925-3816 . Iii aspensurveyots@ginaii.com 1 1 1 1 1 1 11 CIVIL i i 1 1 , 1 11 11 1 TBD 1 1 1 1 1 11 11 1 MECHANICAL TBD 2X EXISTING EAST ELEVATION 1X EXISTING NORTH ELEVATION 3'16 = 1-0 1 -U STRUCTURAL _ - 9 - af fi FIA {00) LD) l F 2 - 4'' 1 TeD T T LINE 0, ADDITION _ _ -1 T 1 , SDI ITH E~E / ~ BETBACK Lilli @ & RENOVATHDN | PROPOSED | EXTE.RMOR | | PROPERTYINE@ * | | 2 PROPE,1/LINE@ AD D D'!ION & r./.3 NORTH ELEI 1 r NORTH ELEv EXTERIOR |1 EXISTINGTO -* ; SETBACKLINE@ SETBACK LINE @ ___ . & lili CONTRACTOR SETBACK I INE @ RENOVATION 1 REMAiN FAST ELEV 2 EAST ELEV NORTH ELEV ilt 1 1 1 11 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 TBD 11 11 I /1 1 PROPOSED ~ . ~ , ~ * l i EXISTING SHAKE 11 1 VE,Ii , 1 Â·' 1 ST.AND:NMEAM . r , 91% 1 1 1 1 .C ~. 1 2 I L___ __ i v t i : 1 Â· SH~NGLE: >/2 1 1 1 1 Â» 11 1 -11 hÂ«-9 E 1 1 1 1 A. 1. 1 92320'. DATE Cf PUS:CATION PROPOSED 2 /,1 I.N{j-i '\1 1 I -i HORÂ·ZO~~ lkâ‚¬ I I .9/ -06]11 \ 1 - ~ 1 SHINGLE ADR DRAINAGE STA!NED CEDAR , EXISTING CEDAR ROOF DECK SLOPED 11 FOR IRA NAGE - | FLAT ROOF SLOPE[ Â·Â·Â· FLAT ROOF 5,OPED 11 1. I I EXIS.INGCED'V 7~ FOR DRArNAGE 0-1 11 Imi 1| .t~ 18 I.,1:E '' ' ELIII I ./ --52; 1 , MI[TIVT. _ _ _ EXIST!1.0 BRICK . -11 1 10 EXiSriNG BRICK Luj ~ 64 1 F *Fr~4 -u FACADE SD bi'30./14 HPC CONCEPT rqt\/ .,111111 t lE=--f~-Ill--1-m -6 ! PROJECT NO. 1411 Il I I DRAWN BY. KPT - : 14 - : COPYRIGHT FORUM PHI LLC i; 1 11 1 1 lili 1 11 1 ~1 1 1 1 1 11 1 1 1 11 1 1 1 1 11 ]1 . 11 1 ~ 11 1 el : 1~ 1 1 1 1,1 1 El Yll t 1 1 i 1 Lil 11 1 1 lili 1 L---- ~1 1 1 11 1 1 1 1 1 ' SHEET TITLE I 1 1 :11 1 Ill 1 Z-201B ELEVATIONS 2 PROPOSED EAST ELEVATION 3'16-= 1'-0 1 PROPOSED NORTH ELEVATION 3/16" = 1-0 OPTION 2 - - rn (3) (0, ~ D.)(c~ il. C I liÂ·~ 4>Q2 <IJ (5) 1 - 4 T ! 1 11,11 1 T 1 ~ 1 715 West Mair, Street. Suite 204 11 1 ~ 1 Aspen, Colorado 8 i611 P 9;0.279.4157 F. 866 770 5585 1 1 1 1 / 1 1 /41 1 1 -% / 4 1 1 1 1 I .00â‚¬Â».. Ik I l\, 4. '4 IL-'11 Ll.,-4 111=Ga= 1 1 101 E HALLAM r/ 1 6~ 1 1 1 1 ' , HALLAM LLC L rÂ·-M / 1 -7-1=| . .4 11 1 r,1 1 101 E Hallam St 1 .1 1 61-.-4 1 Illili E- 21 11-, 11 1 1 411 4 Aspen, Colorado 81611 /117/ 1 1 mi 23!1 1 [rrt]:, ' ' Ill.PLU-i , 11 -111 11 1-1 1 /1 . ' , -54/ 13 ' 1 r' 1 i I 1 f I V , r-.$- 1 .-; 1 1 1- ~ -- -. 4 1 ~ . 1 117--'r- 1 i 1 0 1 1 _111 - ' I~,' Iii i ! I ler,i: ~ I i J il I J 1 11:j!.19 66*ak 1 E 1 , 1 LI 1 11 -1 1 111 91 1 L . 1. 1 1 1 ... -111--dIL Ir-k- i 1, 1 1 11 1: 1 1111 1 11 1 _ CONSULTANTS 1 1 1 11 SURVEYOR 1 1 Aspeh @u-'94 Eng:Aeâ‚¬:i:. Irit- 1 | 210 S Galina Stieet 1 1 1 Aspen, Colorado 81611 ' | | || CIVIL aspensurveyors@gmail com (970) 925-3816 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 ' ' 1 1 TBD 1 ~ 1 1 lili MECHANICAL TBD 4X EXISTING WEIST ELEVATION 3~16Â·Â· = 1 -0" 3X EXISTING SOUTH ELEVATION 3/16 1Â·-0 '71 7-I STRUCTURAL e CD (Â© a G) CA (Â©03 9 1 41- TBD 1 1 1 SETBACK liNE @ ~ T T .~ SETBACK L:NE @ WES'~ ELEv ' SOUTH ELE' P'2OPER-TY LÂ·NE '0 i I I I - pRoPERTY ,NE @ PROPERT~tINE@ 1-louTHELE' DROPOSED 3 .49 ELE: SOUâ„¢.Ey' i SETBACK LINE @ _ EXISTING Tr Â· 7 "iON I : SE BACK LINE @ WEST ELEV I "Â· N _ A ,Ji ~ -- -- Â·CONTRACTOR 1 1 1 /f~ 1 11 1 SOUTH ELEV 1 1 : 4 - i F NC"ATION TBD 1 4 + 11 11 1 11 . PROPOSED ' ' PROPOSED STANDÂ·NG ROOF ' STANDiNG SEAM - 2 114._334 1 . 1 1 .//1 4*, 1 1 SEAM ROOF 1 1 i 1 0----=gÂ« 1 1 \3. 1 9 21201Â·: DATE Or PUBLICATE)N ;j 's I i_ SHINGLE ROOF I i PROPOSED ~ PROK)SED +IOR DDNTAL CEDAR SIDÂ·NG 1-9 :1 2Â·1~ 1 E-1 I . ..~- --~L:4 k | Il | - I || 1 0 F.Nf~NG BiliCK Â·Â· - 6- sTAINED CEDAR lie NG HORCONTA:. 6 EXISTINGCEDAP , 1 14 sHINGIE I Jae=16 | 11 1 1 11 1 1 4 " 2 - Ip,1 1.1 /7 , 1 1.----4---U -1-=t.. 1 1 -1 1 1 5/ 1--7 1 73 1 PROPOGED [1, 11 )1 1 1-1.. 9 1 1 1 : EXISTING BRICK - -) FACADE --- - ----- - ! 5 11; 1 r ; 1 rm 1 111 i '-111 HORIZONTAL 0 1 1 SD 6/30â€¢'14 | HPC CONCEPT REV |YI 1 i L ~ LIli L==[ STAINED CEDAR ~ ~ , ~ 4 ' 1 lit 1 I 11-i.tiliti 1 1 1 . 0111!!Ullf f I i i ! 1,07hrnn"r 1 - 1 / 1 1 1 Â· Â· PROJECT NO: 1411 1 #.1 lilli! 11Â£ DRAWNI BY. KPT COPYRIGHT FORUM PHI LLC 1 1 11 1 1 1 1 1 11 1 IIi: 1 1 1 1 SHEET TITLE Z-202B ELEVATIONS 4 PROPOSED MJEST ELEVATIO'. PROPOSED SOUTH ELEVATION 3/16-= 1'-0 3/16 = 1-0" 3 OPTION 2 t.l_ 715 West Mair, Street Suite 204 Aspen, Colorado 81611 P 970.279 4157 F. 866 770 5'85 101 E HALLAM HALLAM LLC 101 E Hailam St Aspen. Colorado 81611 ./ p i L. 3% 33-t. 4~ i.aity/f .i /91 1.-r .. ~' 47,Â· j:Â·' ditly 4. 23 5.44-.-rv 2 1--44Â»I. , 43*f 'r 4/ ' 9 ' ' : *- ~Â·~ 4. . :. Â· Â· . 4 2.4.4....69+ .* 1....... 3% . I I ' - '. , f.' : & I. r -s:: 39% 443414:9) CONSULTANTS 7 i,1 SURVEYOR 16 ./11.K.UV .:%10 .*' . ..... ES 4 /Â»,4. . 1 : * , ' 'Â· i 2 14 117 .,3;11 4 '.0 .Â· --.- / ..09':/. /1/' /' . ~ Â·41 1% -11:1...41.)-1.v: 'lly/ ~!*f..1. Asp<jn Suiey/ng,â€ž45. Inc t-7 x., A.Â¥'~rl.444,44 44'1.' ...9 .Â· .Â· '' '. ~ w . im:13@*. 210 S Galena Street 7,. 1 3,9..4 Â·~ ~ 0- 9 P . Aspen. Colorado 8161 1 I *60 4 ),~L~Â·1 3.-,~,j,~7~0,- 204*~ . 1Ul~ |~~~ : 2 -1 't ~2*'',1 4. .i~' h:.~~' :-, Â·~'; _Â·a~."* ~ ~ - - ~~ (970 925-3816 i , 2: :/Â· .95 aspensurveyo,s@ginali com ./. V . I- I / 1 ~ . I ~: ~ I.~| ~~& 2!2.t... 1 '49 :. ...-412994tle'>i,FIA q I. , CIVIL | .142 . 3*1 4.--14) tv. ... g'Z. . TBD <4* 3' * 4"52~<2Â£/Q I Tel 254â€ž181 4 Â¥ iÂ· 77413=/0 * .: \ 914 i 1 1 .Â·- F I U . % 1 /d,4,(~~ ~~ -- - - - 0 ~\\ JIL 'BA i: '1 - *1 !1: 11.1, -- MECHANICAL i i Â· TED i.i_ ILL lin h /, .IFT,....., ,/,Il . -Ii,-L 1 1 1 -1.-6-111Â¥1 -=**3.-<01 tin.iq--I=,-4 k - - 4 - "'Â·1 p STRUCTURAL .- 1 TBD CONTRACTOR TBD PROPOSED WEST FACADE OPT' 2 PROPOSED SOUTH FACADE OPT 2 CL r : 4 --Â·Â·1 - 7 ' 0 0' -5 ..Â· 1 12. Â· 31 7 %>1' Â· 75Â·j :.4 ,- DATE Cr PUBUCATION . I t .....: 1 1 4.4 Â«t:Â· ' t' Â· ' . .. h - . 1 Itt 1- 11Â·24.- i. N , /Â· 8 ~b 4*.440 ... : 8 .V. U /,9.-' -1. 'f "0 Â· "i Â· N - it . '61 4, ;el'.14-1'*..~j.3.. 31: . : HPCOONCE.'- P ./ -~- .Â·:,flizi}Â«421 ss 6/30/14 : PROJECT NO 1411 IL' ./ I :/ .4 .' -. '- â€ž *,4:,r.Â£* 42 , ,,"2..'. *.-Â·. ....... I . DRAWN BY KPT a Â· 1 1 ./ : COPYRIGHT FORUM PH: LLC, .. ..14 7 .Â·P Â· .... . Â· I,Ii,1. i..~Â·m~ ..:.. I .4 L..~ ~~JI]12 ' .:.11%-4 ?16.. 19 '' ..tr -I.., ... . i -,le, + - 1 .lk..9.tihi 4.f 1/// F lf.., r t.2 Zij,9 <2., ,~4 h- _... 2- --_Jid-2 -_-1!EL!:'.}*iN,rd!.Ii-';..tâ€¢L!' 14' *01,1,31!,1 ,_1 , 11 1111_2â€¢_-;,'I_u I.ii,u ' iill[~ 21 A L 3:1'77ZKKNMNMENg#+FÂ·. 1 1., *.MU. 1 . ,-- I b Um*et*,Â·4.4~i....p.inÂ·.,1:;Li;:ti~i.;.;iÂ·.ilikf' H 1 'ti921ih " , 1~.Pw=a~~~~4.1~ ~4=6-101 , SHEET TITLE / 442 k.-i.44':;.id~4,Â·;i;,1,4",1",...4 "'B 121:j.Â·,ijwiliti#j j.?t~!!t 0,*t:"ttift41!jil~~:'il.1~1~;;4Â·.c- Z-203B PROPOSED PROPOSED EAST FACADE OPT 2 PROPOSED NORTH FACADE OPT 2 FACADES OPTION 2 rn f ~ T r r @) (30 (0 t F i i 1 1 1 11 1 1 1 : 11 715 West Main Street. Suite 204 ~ Aspen, Colorado 81611 P 970 279.4157 12 866 770 5585 11 1 l~ .,A<* 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 11 11 1 1 1 1 1 101 E HALLAM 'A. 4- Fl d il 1 / 1 | HALLAM LLC 1 1 1, it I .1 101 E Hallam St E 1 / 1 ' g vi Ell-'1 W 1 1 11 Aspen. Colorado 81611 E - ' " ' 41 1 11 ILl_ _Li 9 - 1 23 1 .1 - - - --7.4=7 - -- ----......4 iIi;~1 i...!lt 1 '1 ' 1 10 k' 'j 1 9 Ot E 01 1 1 114 01. 11 1 + i. 2=E~ m 1 1 1 ; : i,., ! : Â·1'Ji , 1 1 1 1 1 1 11 Â· i ~ CONSULTANTS i , I 1 1 i SURVEYOR A.ten Surve? LiÂ·, Â·Â·.rs inc 210 S Galena L'Â·eei | I Aspen. Colorado 81611 , (970) 925-3816 as'ensurveyls@g:Tiail coin CIVIL 1 1 I I 1 1 1 TED 1 1 1 1 11 11 : MECHANICAL TBD 2X EXISTING EAST ELEVATION 3,16' = 1'Â·0' 1X EXISTING NORTH ELEVATION 3/16" = 1,-0 STRUCTURAL G) 9) 60"00'TKN _9 (2)(2 91) TeD T Â· 1 SETBAcI LIE O T SOUTH ELEV 1 1 I PROPOSED 1 | EXTER!08 1 | 1 9.OPER- Â¥ LINE @ 1 i PIROPERTf LINE * PROPE.Y LINE@ ; .... T NORTH "EV lilliTION & , ..ALLS lORri ELE' 1 1 1 CAST ELEV EXTER,OR I | EXISTING TO 1 1 i:ittu'NE @ 1 1 1 | RENOVATION REMAIN I _ _ | 1 SETBACK L;NE @ SETBACK LINE @ ~- EAST ELEV - NORTHELEV , CONTRACTOR 1 1 11 1 1 It .1 110.6 I i I 11 1 -41 4 1 I il I | | '1 1 / ~ ] 1 ! i EXISTINGSHAKE . i i SHINGLE Roof 11 1 PROADIED ~ 1 1 STANDING.,EAM -Â· -- | 1 1 11 14 0 1 RCÂ©F 1 1 1 1 11 â‚¬ 212.Â·Â·: DATE C. PUBLICATION E PROPOSED 1 t - 1 HORIZONLM. 6 ' I - : EX:SING./.AR - S FINED CEDAR t 11 1 R.L.i- "~CK SLOPED FLA ROE)1- 'L'OPED EXIS--ING CE'412 SHAr E 1 11 1 1 11 .~~~nEE~Ii i,Ii!%1 1 A f /112\ 4 1 11.111.1, 7 ; 3j , I. -4. ' 1 1 1 1 j : U L] ' .~ _ EX~STING BRICK ~ ; 0 rf I -----2 952-, 812101â‚¬ Â· 1 FACADE SD ~ 690Â·14 HPC CONCEPT. REV U , Hii: :i.2 i .i PROJECTNO. 1411 1 1 -- 4- DRAWN BY. KPT 1 1 11 11 1 1 1 11 1 1 1 COPYRIGHT FORUM PHI. LLC 1 1 1 111 1 11 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 11 1 11 1 11 1 1 1 1 1 1 I il 1 11 1 11 1 1 : 111 1 11 1 1 1 lili 1 1 El 11 1 I j 4 : L--9 1] 11 , - 1 --2 11 1 11 I i 11 1 1 1 11 1 11 141 SHEET TITLE : 1 1 :1 1 1 11 11 1 Z-201C ELEVATIONS : 2 PROPOSED EAST ELEVATION PROPOSED NORTH ELEVATiON 3'16" = 1'-0 3/16" = 11-0" 1 OPTION 3 -- ' 4 t 0) m (6) :0~4 0 li) aip 1 - 1 1 ' IT 1 11 715 West Main Street Suite 204 1 I I I , 1 1 Aspen, Colorado 81611 1 7/1 1 1 1 1 P 970 279.4157 F 868 770 5585 1 101 E HALLAM 1 - 2 bmv i '31~ mi A. f F * 7-3 1--N 1 1 7 HALLAM LLC 1 1- 1'' 71 1 -==1 h 1.,fl- +9111=1 1 1 11-UN i L 101 E Hallam St Aspen. Colorado 81611 I '2 Ill I ~ 1 51 4/ / 1 1.- r{ 11 F.rol i .1 lib i 1 1 /14 4- 'I]~ i_; -'r ,/1U,2'~ !1 i 1 111144 111 - 11 1,- 111. 11 1 11 1 1 1 ! L_ I . I , i ~ .1 f=- = , 1 11 | | 1~ / 1 = !El 11 11 1 ili 1 1 6~!ii. li -:-, I i I u j i i. [-Li Ill i M 5 1 1 , %0 1 1 I ~ lim i H I Ill IU. , I' 1 ,!111.Il' Ill,111Â· i 1 1 Â· I i 11 , t__s.t_/1, i ~ ' 1 1 1 1 1 11 ~ CONSULTANTS i 1 lili SURVEYOR Aa, in Su,vey-iÂ·Â·~:11â€¢Â·Â·Â·: . Inc 1 1 1 1 1 1 i 1 1 210 S Galâ‚¬,1 01",d 1 1 I I I 1 1 Aspen, Colorado 81611 (970) 925-3816 aspensuiveyois@gmall coil 1 | | ' | |||| CIVIL 1 1 4 ' 1 1 1 1 1 TBD 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 lili MECHANICAL TBD 4X EXISTING WEST ELEVATION 3/1â‚¬1 - 1'.0 3X EXISTING SOUTH ELEVATION 3/16 = 1-0 STRUCTURAL 9 - T A - (71 63 A (19 5,) re TeD ./ --, 1.- V T 111 T f ;[_ .._ ... 3Â£16>ACI<~192@ ~I -A 1. @ LINE'FADDEION - -WIES' ELE: 1 1 t. RENCIATior, l , /*08. L NE e . 11 . PROPEN ~ LINE @ SiETBACk LINE @ EXTFn OR | PR -OSED : SOUTH ELIV ~ Sw. .â€¢ LÂ·..../ 1 -" ULS-i ELE' SETBACK LINE @ CONTRACTOR UEST ELEV , 6/6 2 4 -Â·.IN SOUTH ELEV I ~D 1 R, IN 1 RENOVAT C>N 1 1 Â·1 : fl I qdUL) I f ' 4 4 ~ Ili 14 : 71 --=- -}14 1 1 . PROPOSED STAND NG SEAM ROOF STANDi NG SEAM 9,21201Â·Â· DATEOF~UELIOUDON 13111 Eli A IDCI i Ill.....1 1 '11 ~ ~ ~ 46<5*pr < --*IC~J:21-i EXIST'/SHAKEE - SHINGLE ROO. EXISTING CEDAP PROPOSED HORk>.ON[At e Â·Â·Â·Â· SHiNGLE 1 lilli, 1 6' STAIND CEDAR SO:NG CEDAR /1/.NG rf / I .1 11 1 N lf'~ 4 E---':b'~riniCK 1 11 1 = 1 1 Â« 11: 1 EXISTING BRICK ~ r | :r==~ 1 1 r--I.... -- ... -2.- ------- 1 1 |~-7 1 FACADE PROK,SEE 11 --Â·Â·Â·Â·Â·Â·Â·Â·Â·Â·Â·Â·Â·Â·Â·Â·Â·Â·Â·Â·Â·Â·Â·Â·Â·Â·Â·Â·Â·Â·Â·Â·Â·Â·Â·Â·Â·-_ [=L1 1 10/12/NTAL I -- 1 1 I j i i 1 40 - -4230/14 Hpc CONCEPT REV Bil STAINED CEDAR , ~ , 1 4 1 ' 1 1 1 1 ]*11 :1 1 &=2 11 1 14 A-Efi ~' ' 4_Il 1 6/26 PROJECT NO. 1411 11 1 11 1 1 DRAWN BY: KPT 1 1 1 11 1 COPYRIGHT FORUM PHi. LLC 1 1 11 11 1 1 11 1 1 1 1 11 : 1 1 1 1 lIli 1 1 1 1 1 1 ~ 1| 1 1 1 1 SHEET TITLE 1 E it 11 11 Z-202C ELEVATIONS 4 PROPOSED WEST ELEVATiON PROPOSED SOUTH ELEVATION 3/16" - 1' 0" 3:16Â» = 1'-0" 3 OPTION 3 1. I . 715 West Main Street. Suite 204 Aspen, Colorado 81611 P 970.279.4157 F. 866 770 5585 101 E HALLAM HALLAM LLC 101 E Hallam St Aspen. Colorado 81611 1 I. fil)rl/ - :Â· Ak.:t .314-1 7,- " 7- '. .'..'*-'4 64 ..rÂ· t LX; , 1,4 .54 5 C.73* Â·33-2,-:... i : Â· F.-Â£Ui,t.. - 1.....; -34 22*~ Â·:>- ut - -' -~;:4"." *~'&44*r.yl<.T.V: 1 UA Â·iÂ· CONSULTANTS i.: ' hh)/r 1 -A ' }4,7. SURVEYOR Â¥ k M Aspen Guivey Engineers. Inc 210 S Gatena Street .*. -br,.~~~.2~. f.144#.~VX~6,2+ *-.;4 -f ri 2 ... ' rn ;.. :4 ,.f~k ;5?Le'.It.j-11'ta*Â·'.' :f....:4... 2.7. P.). . ~ 0 1.1 Aspen. Colo,ado 81611 ': f 2,-0 4 9 4~' _~ t ''~~- 4-â€¢=LEM*t#h=y-'=-Â·trÂ·Â·tÂ·-Â·, p-' ' (970) 925-3816 5Â·31 0Â·j.,541,14 , 4'W' T...Mih,/ ~ E.Â·bl~ U,4 aspensurveyls@ginall coli 1 0.1/1 + 1. CIVIL 4-<" rl:i _*..~23-11;,12.- Â·Â· i.l..,1~ TBD Â· - 1 4 .... 11 , -1% . f.4. 1./. I '42. . - . v - Â·Â· 8, 4; 4,1 -.4 .... 4 il,1/imb-*treÂ·1~011 9l1 '1 - - ]Â£ 1 Lt b 16. rf T al =Appit = 2 --21 7 -92= nurs --Â·Â· 1, - '~ MECHANICAL 11 1 31 :..-1.- 'j' Â· 1 Â· 1. TeD tsÂ·~ik.4.1 .-49-liÂ·/47) -6-1,71 - â€žu- P - ri,- f- *tr ,-4 i#- r---,-~i -li 1.- , 'I / 1 -91 ', hai.11.. 1 1.1~ , .: H 1 111.1 â€žL...~L-- i - 11 , 1 ~ 21 i . .9 -U 1 4r ,Â·Â·.9,Â·..1Â·i - - 13 . 1 ' Â·. .t,itillit ' 1 STRUCTURAL TBD CONTRACTOR TBD PROPOSED W'-ST FACADE OPT 3 PROPOSED SOUTH FACADE OPT 3 5.i- . Y. . , . %. - .1 6 , A ~.. 1 ' -+42,4 '4 .....~Â·-Â·/ . Â¥ # ~4~ '0.. I I I' -: . . ... I ...0 9,2120. DATE Of ./.CATION 1... . Â· 3 . 1 i 4, ,/ -2.1. , ~ -- .,4 t ...Â· 7.4 10' â‚¬9 ' 9.5 2.7.6 . .*1Â·Â· I '1,1 Â·/ ' '4 < (.-, Â·Â· ' Al- :t ' . 16 2.> .Â· Â·. I. ~ Â·' Â·1Â¥'~-4. SD 630/14 ~HPC CONCEPT REV 1. Aric/, < 6 .-01krO J :Â·24 Â£ r,- 1 4 202.1 1. ,!. 44':4 151 I f=Af : i .., 2/*-2,31.~4*. . 4/ /a/-1--Â·' F.,1/ SIÂ·'~: 9Â·.--- 1 a . / . , . m.'*11,1 10; J; *'~ ~ t ;. 5 4,0 is,M*14fi jm ' Â·1.~0>{ :9, , ..r .=...==..=------ I r 'Â·'.. -11 t.~1 - /Ma . - -1,21 PROJECT NO 1411 42 . Â· Â·Â·'92~Â¥.Mi ~C *~ ' â€¢P~Â·' v p - F ' i -'*C-1-:iei:;4 -14 -t ,.'. DRAWNBY: APT ..2 N I -V 'i COPYRIGHT iti?.Bitâ‚¬41 EE D.F 1--M. 11 -111 1 1/W' Et -Â·J~ .: I- -W 1 i r FORUM PHI L LC 1.... IM.Â·1 Wif .11.r ), I. 9 i~R r 4 Â· . Â· --'~~~~ 4- 1 " Ilk -1- 94.f fil.*i-~ P: 1: -4 1Â£;14~Ch.~W7,-Â·4*64Â·iR;:Ci29~~w46;~,2,- , , i~Â·.â€ž~41.,*.,Â·.,~4-3.,IM O, r.t~*~;'~-g~- ~~~- - â€žâ€žâ€ž _-it'5}f~ 1.Â·50. Â·r, ~Â·iÂ·.'.. ~- ~ fA . 4 - 4 â€ž - T 1 J Lb'-41 02~ kn,517'~1&*~~ I~29'% b-=.~..-.I .4 2 12.1 . P 'i Â·Ii' Â· ~ tri :,lil ---' ' ; Pf !.|9;lt,I~:, 1~: '14 1. p;; , :. 4?11. j:,1,"11#bri,~~ ,.,:,14,- Ly ]I :~ .~~i 9/mkÂ»gn- ~~-_t ~=---4- . - f H ~3*T" p,i TE t#11Â£llituul'-7 7if 1 â€ž - 1 . SHEET TITLE. j *- L ~; iÂ·,:m.. 11#f,1)'tjfit,~'.Ihifit!Â§' d##1:i.. ..W;1~Â· A __ Z-203C PROPOSED PROPOSED EAST FACADE OPT 3 PROPOSED NORTH FACADE OPT 3 FACADES OPTION 3 715 West Mam Street. Suite 204 Aspen, Colorado 81611 P 970.279.4157 F. 866 770 5585 f - -9//Fir -;'.'Â·. .< -1 1 2 -14 :f- ' 9 1-1 4.1 -4 1 7 ~ .A - 1 â€¢4 1 1.- 1 1 I H & 0./. . 101 E HALLAM 4 1 , HALLAM LLC Â· * 11 -Ell , + 4 1 . ' 77 lr~~ iml 9 - 9 * 3 f I -$ 1 + 101 E Hallam St Â» Aspen, Colorado 81611 I V /'** F Z#* , 3% -0 4 0 . . 11 . ./ 1 - --- 9 - --M 2. -4 - 11 .1 , - ... 5 R ' Ir 1 + T / 1 .1 1 1. 1 0- 4 t!44 r- 1 1 * f v 44- &4 _ i,7 ,11 1 9 - 4 12 1 '. g kie=Cki '1, - -9 1 -: 1,1 1 ' 4 *1 T 4 I -1-4 1 : i -)- fla -ij$,+I ~ 14-ul- U _ ' ''fet Â£16Â£8"4*1 +Li-k .Ui , 0..1/ 4 -+ 1 114 - I -- - 1 , _ ~ 1.- - 4 I CONSULTANTS SURVEYOR ALpen SU,Vt'y ~Â· ' i:Â·I",3 !" 210 S Galina St,ext 105 E HALLAM STREET 103 E HALLAM STREET lei E HALLAM STREET (PROJECT SITE) HISTORIC HOUSE - MIRROR OF HISTORIC PORT'ION OF PROJECT SITE Aspen. Colorado 81611 (970) 925-3816 + r - * CIVIL C'Â·lri, , aspensurveyofs@gmail co,Ti TBO _ p 4 p . 11 1 41 , 1 , / > 1 + I : 6 1 i -Wt 6% MECHANICAL L + : + 391'11.1 1 1905 1 . . I J . 4- 111 1 - ... 1 1- 1 I I Fi -* 0 ' â€¢ STRUCTURAL I 4 â€¢ 1 * I 1 - 70 111 1 E X. ..4 - - - 1 ' ' - - 4% 1 it i 11 : -1 1 11 - .1.' ' *- 1 -1 - 44 ' . + 1 1- 1 -L 1 1. .. 44 1 r I t.. ... - 4 6 + r . i . * CONTRACTOR 1 .1 TBD 4-1 1171 . 4. . 1 - S . M r.6 t./ 1- I 92322'4 DATECIPUBLICATON w- 4%6:*24%*" ~1 4. f .-Â¥b ....4, :.. . 101 E HALLAM STREET (PROJECT SITE) 101 E HALLAM STREET (PROJECT SITE) 101 E HALLAM STREET (PROJECT SITE) 101 E HALLAM STREET (PROJECT Si TE) INTERSEC'TION OF HALLAM & N GARMISPH STREET , all r '1 ' | ~ - | 16111 & . 1 1 1 . 4 4-71 1- 1 1 - I /1 1, , 1-1- 1 SD 9 2- :4 HI'C CONCEPT REV 4 L 9 <4#1 I .1 .1 1 i,_r ' '' 41?15 1 - 1 L ' 1 - L 1 , lilli. * , PROJECT NO 1411 * KPT /.4, ..., 4 1 - 4 1 r r , 14, 1 COPYRIGHT FORUM PHE L LO 4 P - 1 1/1 1 t- 1 12 .1 CL =4. 1 16. 1 - 1 1 111 1 F . . 1, 1 1 1 . 07- 4 - ' *4-1 1,1, .1.F'N 1 + 11 1 . -- Â£ 4 4 , -prit - *Mt ' '.2' 41. i. , la:V Aligt 12,11. 0 7 1 1:al.: 1.1- -- - LE V '1 '.52 - 1 - -*r-+I / "01' '/I ,, . .. 1 SHEET TITLE lit - / ,Â¢,m' ,Â· Af/, ,.2 It ]~le Z-205 14-1 1 1.4-411,12 .141 - -1.1.1 1 4 - . 0/t,Â· hau:. 2 ALLEY BEHIND PROJECT SITE 1 DO E BLEAKER STREET 100 E BLEAKER STREET 100 E BLEAKER STREET HiSTORIC HOUSE WITH NEW ADDITION HISTORIC HOUSE VMTH NEWADDITION HISTORIC HOUSE WITH NEW ADDITION STREETSCAPE ' L-77 ES - .ga .i . 009 % 2014.Al+Pc_ ATTACHMENT 2 - Historic Preservation Land Use ApplicatioilÂ» c - CLE'VI:r i- 1,61 JUN 2 3 2014 PROJECT: CE 101 E Hallam ''7)'* y' -447Â¥ or~,27'-C Â· Name: Location: 101 E Hallam Street Aspen, CO 81611 CITY AND TOWNSITE OF ASPEN Block: 65 Lot: A&W 4.86' OF LOT B (indicate street address. lot & block number or inetes and bounds description ofproperty) Parcel ID # (REQUIRED) 273512437001 APPLICANT: Name: Hallam LLC Address: 715 W Main Street, Ste 204, Aspen CO 81611 Phone #: 970-279-4109 Fax#: E-mail: swilson@forumphi.com REPRESENTATIVE: Name: Steev Wilson Address: 715 W Main Street, Ste 204, Aspen CO 81611 Phone #: 970-279-4109 Fax#: E- Ii,a il: swilson@forumphi.com TYPE OF APPLICATION: (please check all that apply): Ed Historic Designation 11 Relocation (temporary. on 2 Certificate of No Negative Effect E1 or off-site) 2 Certificate of Appropriateness 01 Demolition (total demolition) -Minor Historic Development ~1 Historic Landmark Lot Split -Major Historic Development -Conceptual Historic Development -Final Historic Development -Substantial Amendment EXISTING CONDITIONS: (description of existing buildings. uses, previous approvals. etc.) Single family historic structure originally constructed in 1888 with previous non-historic upper level and roof addition. PROPOSAL: (description of proposed buildings, uses. modifications, etc.) Proposed addition with subordinate linking element and new basement under both historic and proposed. 1-he existing historic structure will be lett in place and underpinned Aspen Historic Preservation Land Use Application Requirements. Updated: May 29,2007 0.00 CONSENT AND AUTHORIZATION TO REPRESENT JAMES AND PATRICIA GORMAN 101 E HALLAM STREET ASPEN, CO 81611 July I, 20 I 4 City of Aspen Community Developrnent Deparlmen] 130 South Galena Street 3"- Floor Aspen. Colorado 8 I 611 101 E Hallam Streel Dear Director, This lettershall serve as my approval for Hallam LLC (represented by Forum Phi) to apply for and submit land use applications, building permit applications, and subsequent documentation for the property at 101 E Hallam Street. I authorize Forum Phi to subrnit, represent and obtain materials on the behalf of the owner of 101 E Hallarn. 1 hereby authorize Steev Wilson and Forum Phi to perforrn and submit docuinents telatea to planning, Building Permil Application, ot to gain building file information on our behalf for the Droiect located at ]01 E Hallarn, They may roprosent us during theappica'Non review and approval processes. They nlay act on our behalf, may sign on our behalf all applications apel permits, and any documents iequired or ancillary thereto. Steev Wilson, Partner, AIA Forum Phi Architecture 715 W Main Street, Ste 204 Aspen. CO 8161 1 Sincefely â‚¬ Patricia Gorman Dote / CONSENT AND AUTHORIZATION TO REPRESENT HALLAM LLC 101 E HALLAM STREET ASPEN, CO 81611 June 4, 2014 City of Aspen Community Development Department 130 South Galena Street, 3rd Floor Aspen, Colorado 81611 101 E Hallam Street, Aspen, CO 81611 Dear Director, This letter shall serve as my approval for Forum Phi Architecture to submit, represent and obtain materials on my behalf. Hallam LLC hereby authorizes Steev Wilson and Forum Phi to submit Land Use Applications and Building Permit Application and documentation on my behalf for the project located at 101 E Hallam Street. They may represent me during the application review and approval processes, They may act on my behalf, may sign on my behalf all applications and permits, and any documents required or ancillary thereto. Steev Wilson, Partner, AIA Forum Phi Architecture 715 W Main Street, Ste 204 Aspen, CO 81611 Sincerely, (0, up , 1(-f HallarrAlC ' C Date 0031Â· 20 V .1 . COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT .. JUN 2 0 2014 Agreement to Pay Application Fees CITY OF ASPEN An agreement between the City of Aspen ('City") and An,viu,In, ne, p- ,PMENT Property Steev Wilson Phone No. 970-279-4109 Owner CID: on behalf of Hallam LLC EmailÂ· swilson@forumphi.com Address of Billing 715 W Main St., Ste 204 Property: 101 E Hallam Street Address. (subject of Aspen, CO 81611 Aspen, CO 81611 (send bills here) application) I understand that the City has adopted, via Ordinance No. , Series of 2011, review fees for Land Use applications and the payment of these fees is a condition precedent to determining application completeness. I understand that as the property owner that I am responsible for paying all fees for this development application. For flat fees and referral fees: I agree to pay the following fees for the services indicated. I understand that these flat fees are non-refundable. $ flat fee for $ flat fee for $ flat fee for $ flat fee for For deposit cases only: The City and I understand that because of the size, nature or scope of the proposed project, it is not possible at this time to know the full extent or total costs involved in processing the application. 1 understand that additional costs over and above the deposit may accrue. I understand and agree that it is impracticable for City staff to complete processing, review, and presentation of sufficient information to enable legally required findings to be made for project consideration, unless invoices are paid in full. The City and I understand and agree that invoices mailed by the City to the above listed billing address and not returned to the City shall be considered by the City as being received by me. I agree to remit payment within 30 days of presentation of an invoice by the City for such services. I have read, understood, and agree to the Land Use Review Fee Policy including consequences for non-payment. I agree to pay the following initial deposit amounts for the specified hours of staff time. I understand that payment of a deposit does not render an application complete or compliant with approval criteria. If actual recorded costs exceed the initial deposit, I agree to pay additional monthly billings to the City to reimburse the City for the processing of my application at the hourly rates hereinafter stated. $ 1,950 deposit for 6 hours of Community Development Department staff time. Additional time above the deposit amount will be billed at $315 per hour. $ deposit for hours of Engineering Department staff time. Additional time above the deposit amount will be billed at $265 per hour. City of Aspen: Property Owner: Chris Bendon Community Development Director Name KT.FIEV LOILLÂ©A) City Use: Title. Acr, ITECr / tioâ‚¬0Â£& ASS-ST- Fees Due: $ 1,950 Received: $ November, 2011 City of Aspen 1 130 S. Galena St. I (970) 920-5090 ' General Information Please check the appropriate boxes below and submit this page along with your application. This inÂ®rmation will help us review your plans and, ifnecessary, coordinate with other agencies thal may be involved. YES NO X El Does the work you are planning include exterior work; including additions, demolitions, new construction. remodeling, rehabilitation or restoration? U Does the work you are planning include interior work including remodeling, rehabilitation, or restoration? X Do you plan other future changes or improvements that could be reviewed at this time? 0 x In addition to City of Aspen approval for a Certificate of Appropriateness or No Negative Effect and a building permit, are you seeking to meet the Secretarv of the Interior's Standard*s.for Rehabilitation or restoration of a National Register of Historic Places property in order to qualify for state or federal tax credits? 0 03 If yes, are you seeking federal rehabilitation investment tax credits in conjunction with this project? (Only income producing properties listed on the National Register are eligible. Owner-occupied residential properties are not.) E E If yes, are you seeking the Colorado State Income Tax Credit for I listorical Preservation? Please check all City of Aspen Historic Preservation Benefits which you plan to use: L Rehabilitation Loan Fund L Conservation Easement Program ki Dimensional Variances U Increased Density d Historic Landmark Lot Split U Waiver of Park Dedication Fees LL Conditional Uses Ed Exemption from Growth Management Quota System C Tax Credits Aspen Historic Preservation Land Use Application Requirements. Updated: May 29,2007 ti: /, '4,4'*/,, ,Â· ARCHITIC: URE :INTERIORS I PLANN:NG FORRUMPH:.COMÂ· 1/ M.,1 .... ;.t 4. TO: Chris Bendon, Community Development Director FROM: Forum Phi RE: 101 E Hallam DATE: June 23, 2014 Dear Director, Forum Phi requests your approval of an HPC Land Use Appl cation based on the "temporary relocation" standards for a historic structure located at 101 E Hallam Street. The subject property is listed on the Aspen Inventory of Historic Landmark Sites and Structures. The single-family residence was previously remodeled with a non-historic addition in 1972. There will be a substantial subgrade/basement addition underneath the historic structure which will cause it to be temporarily shored in place. The existing non-historic main and upper level additions will be remodeled, in addition to a new garage located directly off the alley. The Land Use Application for Relocation as this is the best application for underpinning has been completed per the City of Aspen Community Development Department's Historic Preservation Application Package. Sincerely, Steev Wilson, AIA , . Â·-.# . 4Â¥'4 , 1 } --=Â»93.Â»; At.t.E, .hil R-30/ 1 'tht %7' ' -' -. 1.1 1 If '' , 1 , Al ' 1 9 " 1 ! 1, B SA 1- 2 ---Â·. i' Lif T# 2212 PUD / 1 1 Â·.' DRAINAGE - .9.--J-hL-t.gel,19.4(.1, El .,. ~ ~ ~ ~~ ~ ~ 1 . * . Â·Â·... i , / i: I - ,- li//....~ W.-- 7-Uil--irk/**211Â¢q. C;7 2 t' f /24= R-6 . , , f' 1 :... 1 1., -22 -4 j ' '. -I , Â· -M 1 , 11 -Q - .- -Or'â‚¬9 :0 - NE ./. Â·2 ' 4. 1 1 I -Â·CEÂ« , * 1 lâ„¢~ *Â·i. *9 - Â»2-4 2 1 ' S Â·Â·Â·Â· --4 i ....~ ' -- pz * Â·Â· I Â· . . -- ' 4~ A. L '41.1 ', i li -1.14= P ---t =14-3 -2 / N li -1 .t i .1 r .... j[ I.=437 ~ Â·I N.. ':11. .1- Â»1%.. i i -. Se, 7 --7 4 . t. LP PUD Â»Â·'~UL ' Y' -1 9./ . Â· 2.,Ek~ j 'i' --_-2-'-"i* ,2"-~-~-,rt-:- . ~ ,;DPAINgRA?S tr . -- ' -- ~ CC f h.. i ~ --' Â· -~--11 ~tfÂ· --_~ ~ t 41'' ' --- ....'0 0- %- C.1 :; . :DE f ' 69>Â·t- :"'6,~ R~MFM-., . -Â· Â¥ f AH)AV-09-009-1 Midn-dod pioqa, el Jet,AN 10010@51,43 f ap sues Â®09&5 Â®A83AV weqefi al zastii;fl LUOD'itâ‚¬>Ae<AA/,AAA ap uue â‚¬unipell el e zatidey Jeted ? se/pe, sellenble Â¥ 111 WEST FRANCIS LLC 120 EAST MAIN PARTNERS LLC BRADY WILLIAM JB Ill 28 ROCK RIDGE AVE 120 E MAIN ST 14671 FIELDSTONE OR GREENWICH, CT 06831 ASPEN, CO 81611 SARATOGA, CA 95070 BROCKWAY LEXIE CITY OF ASPEN COLLINS CINDA REV TRUST 7714 FISHER ISLAND DR 130 S GALENA ST 42 PARK LN FISHER ISLAND, FL 331094966 ASPEN, CO 81611 MINNEAPOLIS, MN 55416 CRAWFORD RANDALL & ABIGAIL DOMINGUE FAMILY TRUST DTJ LEGACY PROPERTIES LLC 124 N GARMISCH ST PO BOX 2293 202 W 19TH ST ASPEN. CO 81611 WINTER PARK, FL 32790 EL DORADO, AR 71730 ERWIN GREGORY D GARCIA STEVEN J GARM#SCH LODGING LLC PO BOX 4470 120 N GARMISCH 110 W MAIN ST BASALT. CO 81621 ASPEN, CO 81611 ASPEN, CO 81611 GSW FAMILY INV LP HENRY FREDERICK B TRUST HOGUET CONSTANCE M 1320 HUNSICKER RD 100 W HALL,Â©AM ST 333 E 68TH ST LANCASTER. PA 17601 ASPEN, CO 81611 NEWYORK, NY 10065 JAMMB LLC JOHNSON RICHARD & MONTAE IMBT KRUMM DONALD PAUL REV TRUST 500 S DIXIE HWY STE 201 6820 BRADBURY PO BOX 874 CORAL GABLES, FL 33146 DALLAS, TX 75230 ASPEN, CO 81612 LANDIS CAROLYN MOUNTAIN STATE PROPERTIES LLC PARDUBA JIRI 128 N GARMiSCH ST 715 10TH ST SOUTH 116 N GARMISCH ST ASPEN. CO 81611 NAPLES, FL 34102 ASPEN. CO 81612 PENN PAUL E & SUSAN W RODNEY JOHN W ROSE BRANDON 3830 E 79TH ST 8536 N GOLF DR 625 MT HOPE RD INDIANAPOLIS. IN 46260-3457 PARADISE VALLEY, AZ 85253 WHARTON, NJ 07885 SARDY HOUSE NEW LLC SPEARS NANCY M WOLKENMUTH EDWARD F JR & STEELE 240 CRANDON BLVD #167 PO BOX 2630 JULIANNE BELL REV TRUST KEY BISCAYNE, FL 33149 ASPEN, CO 81612 121 W BLEEKER ST ASPEN, CO 81611 ZATS JULIE 118 N GARMISCH ASPEN, CO 81611 T r--3 ~ iN,%3683 dn-dod asodxa - ,@ded Pead ~ 03>09'~~:. ialelfittli31* t#,CA.Aw 05(13 i @091,5 Â®AkINAV ~*1 i o j aul' 6uote pues . i siegel Â®1082 Asea ATTORNEYS TITLE INSURANCE AGENCY OF ASPEN, LLC 715 WEST MAIN STREET, SUITE 202 ASPEN, COLORADO 81611 OWNERSHIP & ENCUMBRANCE REPORT This report is based on a search made of documents affecting the record title to the property described hereinafter, searched by legal description and by the names of the grantor or grantee. Consequently, the information as to record owner is taken from the most recent recorded Vesting Deed, and the information as to existing encumbrances reflects those documents of record which specifically described the subject property by legal description or which refer to the owner of the property which are filed by name only and do not include the legal description of the property. No information is furnished relative to easements, covenants, conditions and restrictions. This report does include the results of a search under the names of the property owner(s) in the general index. Liability of Attorneys Title Insurance Agency of Aspen, LLC under this Ownership and Encumbrance Report is limited to the fee received. Effective Date: June 25,2014 Property Address: 101 East Hallam Street, Aspen, Colorado. Schedule No: R000798 Parcel No: 273512437001 Taxes: Taxes for the year 2013 have been paid in full in the amount of: $7,065.20. Taxes for 2014 are not yet due or payable. Legal Description: Lot A and the Westerly 4.86 feet of Lot B, Block 65, City and Townsite of Aspen, Pitkin County, Colorado. Record Owner: Patricia Gorman The following liens were found affecting the subject property: Deed of Trust from James J. Gorman and Patricia Gorman to the Public Trustee of Pitkin County for the benefit of UBS Bank USA, to secure an indebtedness in the principal sum of $1,000,000.00, dated February 7,2012, and recorded April 2, 2012, as Reception No. 587904 Attorney; Title Insurance Agency of Aspen, LLC 1 . By: WiWer Van AlstiqÂ£) Authorized Agent TELEPHONE (970) 925-7328 A ~ A FACSIMILE (970) 925-7348 CITY OF ASPEN PRE-APPLICATION CONFERENCE SUMMARY PLANNER: Amy Simon, (970) 429-2758 DATE: 5.20.14 PROJECT: 101 E. Hallam REPRESENTATIVE: Steev Wilson, Forum Phi DESCRIPTION: 101 E. Hallam is listed on the Aspen Inventory of Historic Landmark Sites and Structures. The lot is approximately 3,486 square feet in size and is zoned R-6. The maximum allowable floor area is approximately 2,536 square feet. A possible new purchaser would like to maximize floor area on the site, excavating a basement and constructing a new addition at the rear of the original house. Due to site constraints, a request to demolish a historic shed along the alley might be made. The shed straddles a property line, so work on this structure might affect the adjacent property owner. The project is likely to include requests for setback variances, a floor area bonus, and a possible reduction of on- site parking requirements to one space rather than two. HPC has the authority to consider variances if they allow for better placement of the new construction relative to the historic building. A floor area bonus of up to 500 square feet can be granted for an outstanding preservation effort. A preliminary worksession is required prior to any hearing for any bonus request. Using historic maps and some older photographs, it has become apparent that the roof of the original building has been demolished in the past and replaced with a gable form and dormers that are not original. The original front porch has also been removed and replaced. HPC would likely seek full restoration of the design of the building in order to grant the bonus. The house to the east appears to be a mirror image of the original design at 101 E. Hallam. Demolition of the shed along the alley may be in conflict with the award of bonus floor area, however it may be an acceptable trade-off considering other restoration potential. HPC will conduct a Temporary Relocation review if needed to ensure that the excavation technique for a basement below the Victorian is carefully planned. Design review for any proposed new construction or restoration work will be according to the Historic Preservation Design Guidelines and the Residential Design Standards. The review is a two-step process, with a Conceptual application (mass, site plan, etc.) and a Final application (materials, landscape, lighting.) The purchaser may have unused floor area available to be converted into Transferable Development Rights. Creation of TDRs is reviewed by City Council. The property currently has some features that encroach onto the public right of way along Garmisch Street, a fence and a gazebo. These features must be removed or can be granted temporary encroachment licenses if deemed appropriate by the City of Aspen Engineering Department. Land Use Code Section(s) 26.304 Common Development Review Procedures 26.410 Residential Design Standards 26.415.070.D Certificate of appropriateness for Major development 26.415.080 Demolition of designated historic properties or properties within a historic district 26.415.090 Relocation of designated historic properties. 26.415.110 Benefits 1 RE"m' 26.415.110 Benefits 26.535 Transferrable Development Rights Cl-rv JUN 2 3 2014 26.575.020 Calculations and Measurements CORAdd U h 26.710 R-6 Zone District . 4,1 1//7,29124'4:F Land Use Code (including all code sections cited above): http://www.aspenpitkin. com/Departments/Community-Development/Planning-and-Zoning/Title-26-Land-Use- Code/ HPC Design Guidelines: http.//www.aspenpitkin.com/Depa rtments/Com mun ity-Development/H istoric-Preservation/H istoric-Properties/ HPC application: http.//www.aspenpitkin.com/Portals/0/docs/City/Comdev/Apps%20and%20Fees/2011%20HistoricÂ°/020Land %20Use%20App%20Form.pdf Land Use application: http://www. aspen pitkin.com/Portals/0/docs/Citv/Comdev/Apps%20and%20Fees/2013%20landÂ°/020useÂ°/020app %20form.pdf Review by: Staff for complete application HPC for major development and bonuses City Council for TDRs Public Hearing: Yes, at HPC and Council Second Reading Planning Fees: $1,950 for 6 billable hours (additional or less billable hours are at $325 per hour) at Conceptual application $1,950 for 6 billable hours (additional or less billable hours are at $325 per hour) at Final application $1,300 for 4 billable hours (additional or less billable hours are at $325 per hour) at TDR application Referral Agency Fees: $0 Total Deposit: $1,950 at Conceptual $1,950 at Final $1,300 at TDR application Total Number of Application Copies: 12 at Conceptual and Final, 12 for Council To apply, please submit 1 copy at each submission of: D Signed fee agreement with payment. 0 Applicant's name, address and telephone number in a letter signed by the applicant which states the name, address and telephone number of the representative authorized to act on behalf of the applicant. 0 Street address and legal description of the parcel on which development is proposed to occur Il Disclosure of ownership, consisting of a current certificate from a title insurance company, or attorney licensed to practice in the State of Colorado, listing the names of all owners of the property, and all mortgages, judgments, liens, easements, contracts and agreements affecting the parcel, and demonstrating the owner's right to apply for the Development Application. Il List of adjacent property owners within 300' for public hearing. m Pre-application Conference Summary. m Prior approvals. And 12 copies at Conceptual and Final of: O Completed HPC Land Use application. El An 8 1/2" by 11" vicinity map locating the parcel within the City of Aspen. Il Site improvement survey including topography and vegetation showing the current status, including all easements and vacated rights of way, of the parcel certified by a registered land surveyor, licensed in the state of Colorado. m Scaled drawings of all proposed structure(s) or addition(s) depicting their form, including their height, massing, scale, proportions and roof plan; and the primary features of all elevations. At Final review, provide a lighting plan and landscape plan. m Preliminary selection of primary building materials to be used in construction represented by samples and/or photographs at Conceptual. Final material selections to be provided at Final review. Il Supplemental materials to provide a visual description of the context surrounding the designated historic property or historic district including at least one (1) of the following: diagrams, maps, photographs, models or streetscape elevations. 0 A written description of the proposal and an explanation of how the proposed development, and any requested variances or bonuses, complies with the review standards and design guidelines relevant to the application. El Verification that the proposal complies with Chapter 26.410, Residential design standards or a written request for a variance from any standard that is not being met. Â£ A signed permission letter from the current property owner of 105 E. Hallam regarding potential alterations to the portion of the shed on the applicant's property. And 12 copies at TDR application of: m Completed Land Use Application. El An 8 1/2" x 11" vicinity map locating the subject parcel within the City of Aspen. m A site improvement survey of the sending site depicting existing natural and man-made features and all legal easements and restrictions 0 Existing and proposed elevations and site plan. Il Existing and proposed floor area calculations. Il A written description of the proposal and an explanation in written, graphic, or model form of how the proposed development complies with the review standards relevant to the development application. 0 A notarized affidavit from the sending site property owner signifying acknowledgment of the following: o A deed restriction will permanently encumber the sending site and restrict that property's development rights to below that allowed by right by zoning according to the number of historic TDR certificates established from that sending site. o For each certificate of development right issued by the City for the par-ticular sending site, that property shall be allowed two hundred and fifty (250) square feet less of floor area, as permitted according to the property's zoning, as amended. o The sending site property owner shall have no authority over the manner in which the certificate of development right is used by subsequent owners of the historic TDR certificate. D Proposed TDR deed restriction for the sending site. Applicants are advised that building plans will be required to meet the International Building Code as adopted by the City of Aspen, the Federal Fair Housing Act, and CRS 9.5.112. Please make sure that your application submittal addresses these building-related and accessibility regulations. You may contact the Building Department at 920-5090 for additional information. Disclaimer: The foregoing summary is advisory in nature only and is not binding on the City. The summary is based on current zoning, which is subject to change in the future, and upon factual representations that may or may not be accurate. The summary does not create a legal or vested right.