The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutLand Use Case.530 W Hallam St.0050.2014.AHPC0050.2014. AHPC 530 W HALLAM ST HPC RENOVATION/LOTSPLIT/ NEW RESIDENCE 2735 124 25 004 UE , 0Â»4)449 \ 98 X '00- Â¥9 r i 5 1\1 . U/%Â»53 PULAh)/D &43 1 Â» vu,/5.t 5 G-L /03 A f)- 3- 6/- -- .. THE CITY OF ASPEN City of Aspen Community Development Department CASE NUMBER: 0050.2014.AHPC PARCEL ID NUMBERS: 2735-124-25-004 PROJECT ADDRESS: 530 W HALLAM ST PLANNER: AMY SIMON LANDMARK LOT SPLIT/ HPC CASE DESCRIPTION: RENOVATION/ NEW RESIDENCE KIM RAYMOND FOR REPRESENTATIVE: 530 HALLAM, LLC ORDINANCE DATE OF FINAL ACTION: 6/22/2015 CLOSED BY: ROBERT GREGOR ON: 08/14/2015 .. 2139 -1 -24 - 1 9 - 0 0 4 0050 - 201 4 .45?C- 1 Elle Edit Record Navigate Fgrm Report Format Iab Help i @ 13 4 F ).1 4 A B _#49.r: 4 '64*71â€¢ ' ...m:!I ~ i#]03<23â€¢~ Di 4 > MO jilumpl ~24~~1010~ 1 .7 le@l*31,1Ill.949~1) *1 ~ Custom Fields Rolting Status Fee Summary Adions 'Routing Mistory I 3,21 -42.- --- 12=li. 2 i Permittype ~0 I v |Aspen Historic Land Use permrti~0050.2014-AHPC - - 1&11***%22 2 4*:-* ~ : Address~530 W HALLAM ST , 1 ~ C#lASPEN , ~. Stzte ICO .1 Zip 81611 - h i :Permit InformaboO~ . Master permit Routing queue aslu07 ~ Applied 10/30/2014 y r 1 Status pending Approved ~ Description APPLICATION FOR HPC RENOVATION/LOTSPLIT/NEW RESIDENCE 9/ Issued Â¥ ..r I. itlosed/Final Â·- . Submitted Clock ~ Days F-3 apires ~10/25/2015 2.I 1 Owner ~'a'Tr ~ azi~***i- 'im,F,~14* L last name 530 HALLAM, LLC 4 First name MARK FREDLAND. MGR 133 PROSPECTOR 4102 B 9 Phone ()Â· Address ASPEN CO 81611 Applicant Â® Owner is applicant? Il Contradoris applicant? Last name 530 HALLAM, LLC Â·Â·Â· First name MARK FRIEDLAND, MGR 133 PROSPECTOR r 4102 B t Phone IC ) 1 Cust # 129933 Â·Â·Â· | Addrpqq ASPEN CO 81611 t Lender Last name -Â· First name - Phone () - Address "AspenGold5 (serve(1 angelas E~ 1 of 1 *.: iL_* Â· Â·Â·/-- - *tj: 16-ra C u~TCM r.bmfo* 42-, 21 S~Â· 0 0 -PG~.*1% fcÂ»# l ~ 950 ' e 1-V + 3734\ 45. r Pl I D CP \0\30114 + " '+1' 'Â« Â»:2*fuÂ¢i?"Â°~PÂ«?'~" ~ 4~Â»'. -' ~'~-~~'~'/4 se,ON >10!noU xoqloo--1-1 ~ sdnoiD qg-1-1 10:18.9~AM, REC~ON#: 620986,06/25/2015 at ; 1 OF 3, R $21.00 Doc Code ORDINANCE 1 Janice K. Vos Caudill, Pitkin County, CO ORDINANCE #10 (Series of 2015) AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ASPEN, COLORADO APPROVING A HISTORIC LANDMARK LOT SPLIT FOR THE PROPERTY LOCATED AT 530 W. HALLAM, LOTS K, L, AND M, BLOCK 28, CITY AND TOWNSITE OF ASPEN, COLORADO PARCEL ID #2735-124-25-004 WHEREAS, the applicant, 530 Hallam, LLC, represented by Kim Raymond Architects, has requested a Historic Landmark Lot Split for the property located at 530 W. Hallam, Lots K, L, and M, Block 28,-City and Townsite of Aspen, Colorado; and WHEREAS, for City Council approval of a Historic Landmark Lot Split, the application shall meet the requirements of Municipal Code Section 26.480.060.B regarding Minor Subdivision; and WHEREAS, at their regular meeting on February 11, 2015, the Historic Preservation Commission considered the application, found the application was consistent with the review standards, and recommended City Council approval, with conditions, by a vote of 4 to 0; and WHEREAS, Amy Simon, Historic Preservation Officer, in her staff report to City Council, performed an analysis of the application, found that the review standards for Historic Landmark Lot Split are met, and recommended approval; and WHEREAS, the City Council finds that the proposal meets or exceeds all applicable development standards and that the approval of the development proposal is consistent with the goals and elements ofthe Aspen Area Community Plan; and, WHEREAS, the City Council finds that this Ordinance furthers and is necessary for the promotion of public health, safety, and welfare; and WHEREAS, Ordinance #10, Series of 2015, adopted by City Council on April 13'11,2015, and recorded in the records of the Pitkin County Clerk and Recorder at Reception #620536, is hereby superseded by this document, which establishes a new effective date. This action is taken to correct a public noticing error that affected the April 13~h hearing: and NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ASPEN, COLORADO, THAT: Section 1: Historic Landmark Lot Split Pursuant to the findings set forth in Section 1, above, the City Council does hereby grant a Historic Landmark Lot Split for 530 W. Hallam, Lots K, L, and M, Block 28, City and Townsite of Aspen, Colorado with the following conditions: 530 W. Hallam Ordinance #10, Series of 2015 , Page 1 of 3 .. 1. The Historic Lot Split Plat shall be reviewed and recorded in the office of the Pitkin County Clerk and Recorder, pursuant to Chapter 26.490 - Approval Documents. No subdivision agreement need be prepared or entered into between the applicant and the City. The Plat shall: a. Contain a plat note stating that no further subdivision may be granted for these lots nor will additional units be built without receipt of applicable approvals pursuant to the provisions of the Land Use Code in effect at the time of application; b. Contain a plat note stating that all new development on the lots will conform to the dimensional requirements of the zone district, except for any approved variances; and c. Be labeled to indicate that the maximum floor area allowed on Lot l,a 4,150 square foot lot containing the Victorian home, is 2,138 square feet and on Lot 2, a 4,850 square foot lot containing new home, is 2,442 square feet. Section 2: Severabilitv Ifany section, subsectior&, sentence, clause, phrase or portion ofthis ordinance is for any reason held invalid or unconstitutional in a court of competent jurisdiction, such portion shall be deemed a separate, distinct and independent provision and shall not affect the validity of the remaining portions thereof. Section 3: Existing Litigation This ordinance shall not have any effect on existing litigation and shall not operate as an abatement of any action or proceeding now pending under or by virtue of the ordinances amended as herein provided, and the same shall be construed and concluded under such prior ordinances. Section 4: Vested Rights The Land Use entitlements granted herein shall be vested for a period of three (3) years from the date of issuance of a development order. However, any failure to abide by any of the terms and conditions attendant to this approval shall result in the forfeiture of said vested property rights. Unless otherwise exempted or extended, failure to properly record all plats and agreements required to be recorded, as specified herein, within 180 days of the effective date of the development order shall also result in the forfeiture of said vested property rights and shall render the development order void within the meaning of Section 26.104.050 (Void permits). Zoning that is not part of the approved site-specific development plan shall not result in the creation of a vested property right. No later than fourteen (14) days following final approval of all requisite reviews necessary to obtain a development order as set forth in this Ordinance, including Final Major Development by the HPC, the City Clerk shall cause to be published in a newspaper of general circulation within the j urisdictional boundaries of the City of Aspen, a notice advising the general public of the approval of a site specific development plan and creation of a vested property right pursuant to this Title. Such notice shall be substantially in the following form: Notice is hereby given to the general public of the approval of a site specific development plan, and the creation of a vested property right, valid for a period of three (3) years, pursuant to the Land Use Code of the City of Aspen and Title 24, Article 68, Colorado Revised Statutes, pertaining to the 530 W. Hallam Ordinance #10, Series of 2015 Page 2 of 3 .. following described property: 530 W. Hallam, Lots K, L, and M, Block 28, City and Townsite of Aspen, Colorado. Nothing in this approval shall exempt the development order from subsequent reviews and approvals required by this approval of the general rules, regulations and ordinances or the City of Aspen provided that such reviews and approvals are not inconsistent with this approval. The approval granted hereby shall be subject to all rights of referendum and judicial review; the period of time permitted by law for the exercise of such rights shall not begin to run until the date of publication of the notice of final development approval as required under Section 26.304.070(A). The rights of referendum shall be limited as set forth in the Colorado Constitution and the Aspen Home Rule Charter. Section 5: Public Hearing A public hearing on the ordinance shall be held on the 22nd day of June, 2015, in the City Council Chambers, Aspen City Hall, Aspen, Colorado, fifteen (15) days prior to which hearing a public notice of the same was published in a newspaper of general circulation within the City of Aspen. INTRODUCED, READ AND ORDERED PUBLISHED as/pro4id#d by law, < the City Council ofthe City of Aspen on the 9th day of March, 2015. 11 10- Steven Skadrdi Mayor AT~~~ 11 ALAA.Ulol Linda Manning, City Clerk ~ FINALLY, adopted, passed ani~ approved this 22nd day offune~/20~15. ~ t~ /1 l Steven Slydron, Mayor ATTEST: Linda Manning, City Clerk~ APPROVED AS TO F(TAM: e 57=ZI---~ 0}Aes R. True, City Attorney 530 W. Hallam Ordinance #10, Series of 2015 Page 3 of 3 RECEPTION#: 6~36,06/08/2015 at 11:51:45 AM, l 1 OF 3, R $21.00 Doc Code ORDINANCE Janice K. Vos Caudill, Pitkin County, CO ORDINANCE #10 (Series of 2015) AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ASPEN, COLORADO APPROVING A HISTORIC LANDMARK LOT SPLIT FOR THE PROPERTY LOCATED AT 530 W. HALLAM, LOTS K, L, AND M, BLOCK 28, CITY AND TOWNSITE OF ASPEN, COLORADO PARCEL ID #: 2735-124-25-004 WHEREAS, the applicant, 530 Hallam, LLC, represented by Kim Raymond Architects, has requested a Historic Landmark Lot Split for the property located at 530 W. Hallam, Lots K, L, and M, Block 28, City and Townsite of Aspen, Colorado; and WHEREAS, for-City Council approval of a Historic Landmark Lot Split, the application shall meet the requirements of Municipal Code Section 26.480.060.B regarding Minor Subdivision; and WHEREAS, at their regular meeting on February 11, 2015, the Historic Preservation Commission considered the application, found the application was consistent with the review standards, and recommended City Council approval, with conditions, by a vote of 4 to 0; and WHEREAS, Amy Simon, Historic Preservation Officer, in her staff report to City Council, performed an analysis of the application, found that the review standards for Historic Landmark Lot Split are met, and recommended approval; and WHEREAS, the City Council finds that the proposal meets or exceeds all applicable development standards and that the approval of the development proposal is consistent with the goals and elements of the Aspen Area Community Plan; and, WHEREAS, the City Council finds that this Ordinance furthers and is necessary for the promotion o f public health, safety, and welfare. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ASPEN, COLORADO, THAT: Section 1: Historic Landmark Lot Split Pursuant to the findings set forth in Section 1, above, the City Council does hereby grant a Historic Landmark Lot Split for 530 W. Hallam, Lots K, L, and M, Block 28, City and Townsite of Aspen, Colorado with the following conditions: 1. The Historic Lot Split Plat shall be reviewed and recorded in the office of the Pitkin County Clerk and Recorder, pursuant to Chapter 26.490 - Approval Documents. No subdivision agreement need be prepared or entered into between the applicant and the City. The Plat shall: 530 W. Hallam Ordinance #10, Series of 2015 Page 1 of 3 .. a. Contain a plat note stating that no further subdivision may be granted for these lots nor will additional units be built without receipt of applicable approvals pursuant to the provisions ofthe Land Use Code in effect at the time of application; b. Contain a plat note stating that all new development on the lots will conform to the dimensional requirements of the zone district, except for any approved variances; and c. Be labeled to indicate that the maximum floor area allowed on Lot l,a 4,150 square foot lot containing the Victorian home, is 2,138 square feet and on Lot 2, a 4,850 square foot lot containing new home, is 2,442 square feet. Section 2: Severability If any section, subsection, sentence, clause, phrase or portion o f this ordinance is for any reason held invalid or unconstitutional in a court of competent jurisdiction, such portion shall be deemed a separate, distinct and independent provision and shall not affect the validity of the remaining portions thereof. Section 3: Existine Litigation This ordinance shall not have any effect on existing litigation and shall not operate as an abatement of any action or proceeding now pending under or.by virtue o f the ordinances amended as herein provided, and the same shall be construed and concluded under such prior ordinances, Section 4: Vested Rights The Land Use entitlements granted herein shall be vested for a period of three (3) years from the date of issuance of a development order. However, any failure to abide by any of the terms and conditions attendant to this approval shall result in the forfeiture of said vested property rights. Unless otherwise exempted or extended, failure to properly record all plats and agreements required to be recorded, as specified herein, within 180 days of the effective date of the development order shall also result in the forfeiture of said vested property rights and shall - render the development order void within the meaning o f Section 26.104.050 (Void permits). Zoning that is not part of the approved site-specific development plan shall not result in the creation of a vested property right. No later than fourteen (14) days following final approval of all requisite reviews necessary to obtain a development order as set forth in this Ordinance, including Final Major Development by the HPC, the City Clerk shall cause to be published in a newspaper of general circulation within the jurisdictional boundaries of the City of Aspen, a notice advising the general public of the approval of a site specific development plan and creation. of a vested property right pursuant to this Title. Such notice shall be substantially in the following form:, Notice is hereby given to the general public of the approval of a site specific development plan, and . the creation of a vested property right, valid for a period of three (3) years, pursuant to the Land Use Code of the City of Aspen and Title 24, Article 68, Colorado Revised Statutes, pertaining to the following described property: 530 W. Hallam, Lots K, L, and M, Block 28, City and Townsite of Aspen, Colorado. 530 W. Hallam - Ordinance #10, Series of 2015 Page 2 of 3 0 0 Nothing in this approval shall exempt the development order from subsequent reviews and approvals required by this approval of the general rules, regulations and ordinances or the City o f Aspen provided that such reviews and approvals are not inconsistent with this approval. The approval granted hereby shall be subject to all rights of referendum and judicial review; the period of time permitted by law for the exercise of such rights shall not begin to run until the date of publication of the notice of final development approval as required under Section 26.304.070(A). The rights of referendum shall be limited as set forth in the Colorado Constitution and the Aspen Home Rule Charter. Section 5: Public Hearing A public hearing on the ordinance shall be held on the 13th day of April, 2015, in the City Council Chambers, Aspen City Hall, Aspen, Colorado, fifteen (15) days prior to which hearing a public notice of the same was published in a newspaper of general circulation within the City of Aspen. INTRODUCED, READ AND ORDERED PUBLISHED af- prdvided by law, by the City Council of the City of Aspen on the 9th day of March,Â·2015, EL__l \ l / . 41~-/t, 173' Steven Skadr#, Mayor ATmEST: MOJ'U*kj\14 Linda Manning, City Clerk FINALLY, adopted, passed and approved this 13, day of Ar-l~ 2014. /'~ ~ 1 I Steven Skadron, Mfor ATFEST: 01MA "1.Â»111 tinda Manning, City Clerl~ APPROVED AS TO FORM: ~mes R. True, City Attorney 530 W. Hallam Ordinance #10, Series of 2015 Page 3 of 3 Ivivil, Ivial 94, Dv I U VVI ..... -VW 01/1 /fo .. 11050592 530 - Mjlt Ad Ticket #5 3 - 1/6 rj C 0 rcQ 90 Acct: 1013028 Name: Aspen (LEGALS) City of Phone: (970)920-5064 Address: 130 S Galena St E-Mail: ANGELA.SCOREY@CITY Client: Caller: Angela Scorey City: Aspen Receipt State: CO Zip: 81611 Ad Name: 11050592A Original Id: 0 Editions: 8ATI/8ATW/ Class: 0990 Start: 03/26/15 Stop: 03/26/15 Color: Issue 1 Copyline: 530 Hallam street lot split Rep: AT Legals PUBLIC NOTICE RE:530 W. HALLAM STREET- HISTORIC LANDMARK LOT SPLIT Lines: 25 NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN thal a public hearing Depth: 2.1 will be held on Monday, April 13,2015, at a meet- ing to begin at 5:00 p.m. before the Aspen City Columns: 1 Council, Council Chambers, City Hall, 130 S. Gale- na St., Aspen to con sider an application submitted Discount: 0.00 by 530 Hallam LLC, 0133 Prospector Lane, Sle. Commission: 0.00 4102B, Aspen, CO 81611, aftecting the pr~erly at, 530 W. Hallam, Lots K, L, and M, Block 8, City and Townsile 01 Aspen, Colorado, Parcel Net: 0.00 ID#2735-124-25-004. The applicant is requesting Tax: 0.00 approval to subdivide the lot for the construction of a new home. For further intorrnation, contact Amy Simon at the City 01 Aspen Community Develop- Total 12.65 ment Department, 130 S. Galena St., Aspen, CO, (970) 429-2758, amy.simon@cityolaspen.com Payment 0.00 s/ Steven Skadron, Mayor Aspen City Council Published in the Aspen Times on March 26,2015. (11050592) Ad shown is not actual print size .. MEMORANDUM TO: Mayor Skadron and City Council THRU: Chris Bendon, Community Development Director FROM: Amy Simon, Historic Preservation Officer RE: 530 W. Hallam Historic Landmark Lot Split, Second Reading of Ordinance #10, Series of 2015 DATE: June 22, 2015 SUMMARY: On April 13th, City Council adopted Ordinance #10, Series of 2015, allowing for a Historic Landmark Lot Split of 530 W. Hallam. Following the meeting, it was determined that the applicant had not completed their public notice requirements properly. A new second reading is being held, with new publication, posting and mailing provided. Council is asked to amend Ordinance #10, Series of 2015, to establish a revised effective date. The following memo and ordinance are otherwise identical to the April 13th packet. 530 W. Hallam is a Victorian era home with 1970s and 1980s additions to the east and rear. The applicant proposes to demolish the non-historic additions, move the house front and west, towards the corner, and add on. The lot is to be subdivided so that the open yard on the east side of the Victorian can be developed with a new home. The allowed floor area for the project is the same as would be permitted for a duplex or two detached houses on the property with no subdivision involved. 1--: I . 2 %91. 13, 'Affmt /11 "/f:LF'El. # e.ja 1,& I -/--171'A ,slt â‚¬= .rt,4.@,-,2 . .fle=7 1 -4 - :trIN: .c- ~'- w_ _ 04'P Top left: The house in approximately the 1950s. Top right: The house in 1980, with a one story addition that altered the original design. .* 1161 Left: The site is now inundated with trees that were planted in the - - right of way. The City Forester has reviewed the property and has indicated that two trees should be removed because of declining health and overcrowding. ?r .. APPLICANT: 530 Hallam, LLC, represented by Kim Raymond Architects. PARCEL ID: 2735-124-25-004. ADDRESS: 530 W. -Hallam, Lots K, L, and M, Block 28, City and Townsite of Aspen, Colorado. ZONING: R-6. HISTORIC LANDMARK LOT SPLIT The split of a lot that is a designated Ilistoric Landmark for the purpose of creating one additional development parcel shall be approved, approved with conditions, or denied by the City Council, pursuant to Section 26.480.030 - Procedures for Review, after a recommendation is provided by the Historic Preservation Commission pursuant to Section 26.415.110(A) Historic Landmark Lot Split, and according to the following standards: 1. The request complies with the requirements of Section 26.480.040, General Subdivision Review Standards. A. Guaranteed Access to a Public Way. All subdivided lots must have perpetual unobstructed legal vehicular access to a public way. A proposed subdivision shall not eliminate or obstruct legal vehicular access from a public way to an adjacent property. All streets in a Subdivision retained under private ownership shall be dedicated to public use to ensure adequate public and emergency access. Security/privacy gates across access points and driveways are prohibited. B. Alignment with Original Townsite Plat. The proposed lot lines shall approximate, to the extent practical, the platting of the Original Aspen Townsite, and additions thereto, as applicable to the subject land. Minor deviations from the original platting lines to accommodate significant features of the site may be approved. C. Zoning Conformance. All new lots shall conform to the requirements of the zone district in which the property is situated, including variations and variances approved pursuant to this Title. A single lot shall not be located in more than one zone district unless unique circumstances dictate. A rezoning application may be considered concurrently with subdivision review. D. Existing Structures, Uses, and Non-Conformities. A subdivision shall not create or increase the non-conformity of a use, structure or parcel. A rezoning application or other mechanism to correct the non-conforming nature of a use, structure, or parcel may be considered concurrently. 530 W. Hallam Page 2 0 f 4 .. In the case where an existing structure or use occupies a site eligible for subdivision, the structure need not be demolished and the use need not be discontinued prior to application for subdivision. If approval of a subdivision creates a non-conforming structure or use, including a structure spanning a parcel boundary, such structure or use may continue until recordation of the subdivision plat. Alternatively, the City may accept certain assurance that the non-conformities will be remedied after recordation of the subdivision plat. Such assurances shall be reflected in a development agreement or other legal mechanism acceptable to the City Attorney and may be time-bound or secured with a financial surety. 0 ' .1 Staff Response: The application, to split the lot into one 4,150 ~ square foot lot, containing a relocated Victorian home, and one All w 4,850 square foot lot, containing a new home, meets the criteria *2 above. According to the 1904 Sanborn Fire Insurance map at *1 7 right, there were two houses on the subject property in the dc jl 1- Victorian era. 2. The fathering parcel is listed in the Inventory of -3 32 1 Historic Sites and Structures. " .1 Staff Response: The parcel is listed on the Inventory of 7 Historic Sites and Structures. 4:cru 212.Câ€¢7 M ,fEF 337 3 3. No more than two lots are created by the Historic Landmark Lot Split. No more than one historic landmark lot split shall occur on any one fathering parcel. Staff Response: Two lots are created. 4. In residential zone districts, the allowable Floor Area for each new residential lot shall be established by allocating the total allowable Floor Area of the fathering parcel to each of the new lots such that no overall increase in Floor Area is achieved and no individual lot allows a Floor Area in excess of that allowed a similarly-sized lot in the same zone district. An equal distribution is not required. The allowable Floor Area for each new lot shall be noted on the Historic Lot Split Plat. Any Floor Area bonus already granted by the Historic Preservation Commission shall be allocated to each individual parcel and shall also be noted on the plat as a square footage bonus. If the properties remain eligible for a Floor Area bonus from the Historic Preservation Commission, the plat and subdivision agreement shall specify the manner in which this potential bonus shall be allocated to the two properties if received. In non-residential zones districts, the Floor Area shall be calculated according to the limitations of the zone district applied to each new lot as permitted for the use. 530 W. Hallam Page 3 of 4 -1%7 .. The total Floor Area shall not be stated on the plat because the floor area will be determined by the use established on each parcel. Staff Response: The allowable floor area on the fathering (existing) parcel is 4,080 square feet. The applicant proposes to split that, plus a 500 square foot floor area bonus granted by HPC, approximately 45% to the Victorian home and 55% to the new home. The floor area for the project is only about 700 square feet more than exists in the single family home on the site today. 5. The Historic Lot Split Plat shall be reviewed and recorded in the office of the Pitkin County Clerk and Recorder, pursuant to Chapter 26.490 - Approval Documents. No subdivision agreement need be prepared or entered into between the applicant and the City unless the Community Development Director determines such an agreement is necessary. Staff Response: The plat will be filed subsequent to historic landmark lot split approval by City Council. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff and HPC recommend Council support the proposed Historic Landmark Lot Split. RECOMMENDED MOTION: "I move to adopt Ordinance #10, Series of 2015." CITY MANAGER COMMENTS: EXHIBITS: Ordinance #10, Series of 2015 Exhibit A: Application 530 W. Hallam Page 4 0 f 4 .. ORDINANCE #10 (Series of 2015) AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ASPEN, COLORADO APPROVING A HISTORIC LANDMARK LOT SPLIT FOR THE PROPERTY LOCATED AT 530 W. HALLAM, LOTS K, L, AND M, BLOCK 28, CITY AND TOWNSITE OF ASPEN, COLORADO PARCEL ID #2735-124-25-004 WHEREAS, the applicant, 530 Hallam, LLC, represented by Kim Raymond Architects, has requested a Historic Landmark Lot Split for the property located at 530 W. Hallam, Lots K, L, and M, Block 28, City and Townsite of Aspen, Colorado; and WHEREAS, for City Council approval of a Historic Landmark Lot Split, the application shall meet the requirements of Municipal Code Section 26.480.060.B regarding Minor Subdivision; and WHEREAS, at their regular meeting on February 11, 2015, the Historic Preservation Commission considered the application, found the application was consistent with the review standards, and recommended City Council approval, with conditions, by a vote of 4 to 0; and WHEREAS, Amy Simon, Historic Preservation Officer, in her staff report to City Council, performed an analysis of the application, found that the review standards for Historic Landmark Lot Split are met, and recommended approval; and WHEREAS, the City Council finds that the proposal meets or exceeds all applicable development standards and that the approval of the development proposal is consistent with the goals and elements ofthe Aspen Area Community Plan; and. WHEREAS, the City Council finds that this Ordinance furthers and is necessary for the promotion of public health, safety, and welfare; and WHEREAS, Ordinance #10, Series of 2015. adopted by City Council on April 13% 2015, and recorded in the records of the Pitkin County Clerk and Recorder at Reception #620536, is hereby superseded by this document, which establishes a new effective date. This action is taken to correct a public noticing error that affected the April 13th hearing; and NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ASPEN, COLORADO, THAT: Section 1: Historic Landmark Lot Split Pursuant to the findings set forth in Section 1, above, the City Council does hereby grant a Historic Landmark Lot Split for 530 W. Hallam, Lots K, L, and M, Block 28, City and Townsite of Aspen, Colorado with the following conditions: 530 W. Hallam Ordinance #10, Series of 2015 Page 1 of 3 .. 1. The LIistoric Lot Split Plat shall be reviewed and recorded in the office of the Pitkin County Clerk and Recorder, pursuant to Chapter 26.490 - Approval Documents. No subdivision agreement need be prepared or entered into between the applicant and the City. The Plat shall: a. Contain a plat note stating that no further subdivision may be granted for these lots nor will additional units be built without receipt of applicable approvals pursuant to the provisions ofthe Land Use Code in effect at the time of application; b. Contain a plat note stating that all new development on the lots will conform to the dimensional requirements of the zone district, except for any approved variances; and e. Be labeled to indicate that the maximum floor area allowed on Lot l,a 4,150 square foot lot containing the Victorian home, is 2,138 square feet and on Lot 2, a 4,850 square foot lot containing new home, is 2,442 square feet. Section 2: Severabilitv If any section, subsection, sentence, clause, phrase or portion of this ordinance is for any reason held invalid or unconstitutional in a court of competent jurisdiction, such portion shall be deemed a separate, distinct and independent provision and shall not affect the validity of the remaining portions thereof. Section 3: Existing Litigation This ordinance shall not have any effect on existing litigation and shall not operate as an abatement of any action or proceeding now pending under or by virtue of the ordinances amended as herein provided, and the same shall be construed and concluded under such prior ordinances. Section 4: Vested Rights The Land Use entitlements granted herein shall be vested for a period of three (3) years from the date of issuance of a development order. However, any failure to abide by any of the terms and conditions attendant to this approval shall result in the forfeiture of said vested property rights. Unless otherwise exempted or extended, failure to properly record all plats and agreements required to be recorded, as specified herein, within 180 days of the effective date of the development order shall also result in the forfeiture of said vested property rights and shall render the development order void within the meaning of Section 26.104.050 (Void permits). Zoning that is not part of the approved site-specific development plan shall not result in the creation of a vested property right. No later than fourteen (14) days following final approval of all requisite reviews necessary to obtain a development order as set forth in this Ordinance, including Final Major Development by the IIPC, the City Clerk shall cause to be published in a newspaper of general circulation within the jurisdictional boundaries of the City of Aspen, a notice advising the general public of the approval of a site specific development plan and creation of a vested property right pursuant to this Title. Such notice shall be substantially in the following form: Notice is hereby given to the general public of the approval of a site specific development plan, and the creation of a vested property right, valid for a period of three (3) years, pursuant to the Land Use Code ofthe City of Aspen and Title 24, Article 68, Colorado Revised Statutes, pertaining to the 530 W. Hallam Ordinance #10, Series of 2015 Page 2 of 3 .. following described property: 530 W. Hallam, Lots K, L, and M, Block 28, City and Townsite of Aspen, Colorado. Nothing in this approval shall exempt the development order from subsequent reviews and approvals required by this approval of the general rules, regulations and ordinances or the City of Aspen provided that such reviews and approvals are not inconsistent with this approval. The approval granted hereby shall be subject to all rights of referendum and judicial review; the period of time permitted by law for the exercise of such rights shall not begin to run until the date of publication of the notice of final development approval as required under Section 26.304.070(A). The rights of referendum shall be limited as set forth in the Colorado Constitution and the Aspen Home Rule Charter. Section 5: Public Hearing A public hearing on the ordinance shall be held on the 22nd day of June, 2015, in the City Council Chambers, Aspen City Hall, Aspen, Colorado, fifteen (15) days prior to which hearing a public notice of the same was published in a newspaper of general circulation within the City of Aspen. INTRODUCED, READ AND ORDERED PUBLISHED as provided by law, by the City Council ofthe City of Aspen on the 9th day of March, 2015. Steven Skadron, Mayor ATTEST: Linda Manning, City Clerk FINALLY, adopted, passed and approved this day of ,2015. Steven Skadron, Mayor ATTEST: Kathryn Koch, City Clerk APPROVED AS TO FORM: James R. True, City Attorney 530 W. Hallam Ordinance #10, Series of 2015 Page 3 of 3 *0Â·2Â£,tlt .AffPc, ATTACHMENT 2 -LAND USE APPLICATION PROJECT: Name: 518 UALLAwn C LL.(L - q.idovAÂ·Â·lk// //,of 57(.107/ 6/ Location: Â£510 1/ 14/ALLAwi 457144 116.j 12â‚¬5 1,1Â£ncE. (indicate street address, lot & bfock nuviber, legal description where appropriate) Parcel ID # (REQUIRED) 2-143/3 - /,24Â·,29-0 8 cl APPLICANT: Name: 5-030 #ALCA+04 LLC'. * r/\Ave Ff,1 OPLA,13,Â· PMAF. Address: 01 33 71265-FreÂ·16'\2 492.2 1 LA STEY) â‚¬74, d Phone #: 910- 1180 REPRESENTATIVE: Name: 16*1 14*VF*lonry /4122-Mia-ECT-s, )Â»c, Addmss: (,)033 r/BAS-Feclk# - Sull-â‚¬-- 410'ZY'; 437Er? Phone #: 8 227 - 02-26 2-. TYPE OF APPLICATION: (please check all that apply): El GMQS Exemption El Conceptual PUD U Temporary Use O GMQS Allotment E] Final PUD (& PUD Amendment) C] Text/Map Amendment O Special Review D Subdivision U Conceptual SPA [3 ESA - 8040 Greenline, Stream 0 Subdivision Exemption (includes D Final SPA (& SPA Margin, Hallam Lake Bluff, condominiumization) Amendment) ;. Mountain View Plane O Commercial Design Review [~' Lot Split/F/1 5100*1 6 El Small Lodge Conversion/ Expansioti Rf Residential Design Variance Â¤ Lot Line Adjustment R Other: EÂ¥~>6-, ~ Conditional Use EXISTING CONDITIONS: (description of existing buildmgs, uses, pluvious approvals, etc.) 1/.p'14 lÂ£ FAyvILLf LI-/5'12Â¥~c- 1*51 ro'/LY) 60Â£ kd n,U pylflltil,LS *991-86]49 014 A LA.LOYMAÂ« 7(ligf-r Y App. 0-1- 19 732 PROPOSAL: (description of proposed buildings, uses, modifications, etc.) r At,toVAÂ·Â¥00Â· 4pelkfi C S-1*uo-ru 12:189Â£Â·J'no Kicipel. 4.09/1-/ani, PlÂ®vt W,510,0/c kikt-440,1,0,*1 e REA*,/ 6-6 -1 6961-f i Flitosipi.aLÂ¢-0 0491LLY trk-p,1 0- Have you attached the following? FEES DUE:$ 1Â£14 - 8 Pre-Application Conference Summary EZ[ Attachment #1, Signed Fee Agreement ~ Response to Attachment #3, Dimensional Requirements Form Response to Attachinent #4, Submittal Requirements- Including Written Responses to Review Standards ~ 3-D Model for large project All plans that are larger than 8,5" X 11" must be folded. A disk with an electric eopy of all written text (Microsoft Word Format) must be submitted as part of the application. Large scale projects should include An elecironic 3-D model. Your pre-application conference summary will indicate ifyou must submit a 3-D model. â€¢ .'1 .. IMPROVEMENT SURVEY PLAT Of , 530 W. HALLAM STREET SECTION 12, TOWNSHIP 10 SOUTH, RANGE 85 WEST OF THE 6th P.M. LOTS K, L & M, BLOCK 28 CITY & TOWNSITE OF ASPEN COUNTY OF PITKIN, STATE OF COLORADO 6*44~ 4651*~W| I SHEET 1/2 %/-:'Â·ft#NtÂ·ji#P:.//:.eL<..42; -6.Â·tÂ·.1 -'Â·44's-*-V.*7:....6 .s t I 4-.-i-C.W., r'...1 . -C. .1 C I VICINITY MAP PROPERTY DESCRIPTION ~LIJ[14-- == ...TION.0 522237 LOTS K. L. & U. 8Â«XI[ a O. #D TOWNS[TE OF .PEN /FOU~01~D.Ml~~MI!~t~~ML~râ€ž -,-1.' 5URVEY NOTE5 .T~O,~an..Ince.â€¢ / / I DA'OrrIELIWORK ..14Â·15.NOSEPTEMB.132014 Ae=&- El -I.-.. -1 -I.-U I ....FPREFARATION 1/LY.NOSEPTE'.8,1014 I 1, BAS,soyan.ING .8EARING.F...............THWISTCORMFP C~,CÂ»...al.rn- ....:â€¢'ll A /-- 0~ BLOCK 20 {MONUMENTED GY A 1 PIPE WITH AN UNNA~KED METAL CAM AND THE crre T, .1 Lor, souTH.......WRK'SADDITIONSUB/1/SION[MONUMENTEDWI'HAN' 5 / *BAA~THAN,UEGIBLECAp} 4} SA515 OF SUR.Â¥ 'OCUIENTS PER COU.. RECORDS} THE HISTORIC .NOMARk 1 ioi Rri.". w FRANCISSTREET SueD,VIWONE*EMPTION PLAT RECORDED / -%/. 1003~RECEPTe. NO .777{*. n]LIMPROVEM[NTANDTOPOG-HIC 2000.RECEPrIONNO u2863: THECON.OkILNIUMUAPO~Cl ARKSADDITION .CO~DED JU~Â¥â„¢1980/RECEPTIONNO.2154. TME;IRSTSUP. EMENâ„¢PLATTI â„¢ECONCOMINIUMMAPOFC~RISADOÂ¢rlONRECORDED~ANUARy 26 1981. 7.~Culm=Um' RECEPTION.0 13043,THEOFFICkMAFC*THEC,â„¢OF ASPEN PHEPARED@YGE 8uo,ANAN,DATE0DECEUSEHa1959. Clâ„¢OFASPENGPSCO~TROL MONUMENTAnoNMAPPREPAREDBYM~aNENGINE[RINGLLC. DATEDDECEM8Â£R 2 - '.t:::* -t.. 2009: VAR~CUS DOCUUENTS OF RECORD: ANO TH* ~OUND MONOMENTS.. ~OWN ..14.LT",W I THIS.IMY'IES'CTCONSn./.m/SEARCH...PRIS.GINEERING.U.(SE) TODETERMINEOWNERSHIPORE*MENTSOFRECORO 'Om.UNFOR/AnON REGARING EASEMEN"r ~GHTS OF WAY AND/OR TITLE 0' AECOAO, SE REUED UPON â„¢E AeOVESAIDPLAT~OESCRIBEDIN NOTÂ£4ANDâ„¢EnTUCOMM~MENTPREPAaEDBY PITKINCCUMâ„¢TITLE. INC,C~ENO PCI1412]W~H~EFFECTMOATEOF JUN 1111.ill'll pROPFR~ SHOWNHE~FON CONTO=INTERVALIONE[l,FOOT 1 m B~ISOFELEVATION:THE 28 TUM.*ICHIS BAsEDONANELEVATION OF 7720 SM'{NAVO 1-~ON THE NGS 5TATION~5Â·159",â„¢IS 1 f ' ..-.....'......-I./.---I'.......... SURVEYOR'SCERn FICATE I,...s ...........C..1. To..Alâ„¢ASPENHOUSEr/C.COLORADO / MITED'AN'mCOMPANÂ¥.INg'WOODULAND.I./LUU.I. lk. d THAT./.AN....MENTURVEYPW'.OEANED.C.R. Â§3851 10*/WD GRAMIIC SCALE â„¢AT FT IS A MONUMENrED ~ND SUR~Y SHOWING THE CURRENT LO~~ION OF ALL DESCRIGED PARCEL ANC WIâ„¢IN FM FEET OF All aOUNOARIES OF Sl~ PARCEL ANY CONF~TINGBOUNO~Â¥~DENCEO~*18LE ENCROAOIMENTS AND AUE~EM~TS PUIN,~SIBLEROADS. TRAUUTILITIEi FENCES lIEDGES ORWALLSyn,ATEDONTME AND AIGHTS OF WAy OF A PUBLIC OR PRIVATE NA~RE â„¢AT ARE Vt516U, OR -~ENT, 1 -h . 30 I DROf RECOROANOUNDERGROUNDU,lUT,Â£50ESCRIeEDINATI0NCOUN.mU.INC $ mINSURANCECASENO PCT24123W, OROâ„¢ER~OUNCES~SPECIFIEOC~THE SOPRIS ENGINEERING - LLC IMPROVEMEN~SURVE~PLA'. CIVIL IONJULIAN 15 â€¢ 502 MAIN STREET. SUITE A' 1====m CARBONDALE, COLORADO 81623 MARK S. 8EC~LER . #28643 (970) 704-0311 50.1.[SENG COM , 41!le .e ,â€¢ 1. - .. IMPROVEMENTSURVEYPLATOF 530 W. HALLAM STREET SECTION 12, TOWNSHIP 10 SOUTH, RANGE 85 WEST OF THE 6th P.M. LOTS K, L & M, BLOCK 28 CITY & TOWNSITE OF ASPEN COUNTY OF PITKIN, STATE OF COLORADO . 5HEET 2 OF 2 LOrt LOT' r LOTO REC NO. 477706 REC. NO 477706 GRAVE[ SURFACE I . B.5 28 ALLtÂ¥ I Ex,STINGCONDInONSLEGEND i . . 21'#7' RIGHT-OF WAY I . CArl ..,1, 1] ILitlRCe,i~~ 1 1- / -------=2== A .lilli 0 /'A'.,1. S.'0911 F C 7 14.f , CONIFEROU~ TREK dz Ill 1=L_I'l i . SINGLE FAM LY AAULTI LEVEL " -3 ~ 1- 6-3 WOOD FF AME HOUSE J G 1 1 - d t:=Â· n:l'~1~fiC Le 0.20'AC.+/-SLP/ytftlf<-< 1 1 + % r==tr'n=,~' -'7~~ M[.,0.Lcw I LOT N ' I. 23 /,0/ X,% r O 31 1.1*.. Â·Â· ~ Â· 9-3/Y~- ,-rn /1 1-4-, '19,1 14 A LOT K L(Pf L 1 I ,Â·CON,FERUM * C 0 1.-293,~ _ 51 \ C. 3 ' A-m//A~n'W 1111(21~z~~~ 3/4dgIA . ' 4 , NE. A ULtuy x HA1LAM STREET 74 38' RIGHT-OF WAY GRAPHIC SCALE */HAI SURFACE I IN .1, SOPRIS ENGINEERING-LLC L-h. 10/ CIVILCONSULTAN 3 502 MAIN STREET. SUITE Al CARBONDALE. COLORADO 81623 (970)704-0311 SOPRISENG@SOPRISENG COM 76.24 RIGHT OP WAY 5TH STREET y ASPHALT SURFACE ....09 17T 9 .. IT . ~ CON :RET~RFACE rrYP J /~T e I In-0-1 -- L WINDOW WELL 11111111]1111117 - 11 2 'P C .1111111111 'Elll J 1 0 h 149 1 . > e 14 1,58&54 ft r-, I 1 4~ 1 Iii SEALED OFF APPARENT E 2,2 4 4 eaft i 1 /1 .TAINING./1 --I BASEMENT OR CRAWLSPACE ,/ 1 '9:U-/--1-/- ~Â£/9 ACCESS/COAL CHUTE 1 2:JS#ra -" IX I *0â€¢.0-'.1--~-1-1* 1 4 r---I 11 1 11111mnr Â· ---1 A \ ' - z 0 -= 111['11[1 1 - 0 1 r.Â«, 9 U -- - 1 1%!KAIL--,-- - O 111111FU , 1 1 111 z 0 Mill' aft 1 2. O m< 0 0 .0 29 0' UPPER LEVELDEMO -a v,/Â·. I MAIN LEVEL DEMO I f 5Off aT l Â® 1 .TE ISSLE -- ~-0 1 0/El -EVEL .07 ING.U.E. I CALCJLATIONS. ~ ~ ~ , MAIN LEVEL EXISTIN/(22â€¢4Â·14/Â· 1 3/Â·el Â·20;-:ell 3/ 55~Â¢015=Â·18â€¢Â·133- 1...... I UPPER LIVEL EXITIN/(15/2.6. 1/44/F .)0 685.112Â·14579F. | 1:0/1:ING ExJ./.6 4/3./. 9- Ill@ 1111'lili:' Sail 1 .NOTED 0 8"8"d;-1Â®d = 111"IE; A 1.4 LOWER LEVEL DEMO .._ I.â€¢ . .NI 'Sl.O.1'H../. IAIÂ¥11VH 1332j.LSMV'tlVH 03-NldSÂ¥ 931Â¥0 0~30 .t- " 1- Wil --1-,M.* e. W I .$ I i - I - I \ 6%342*E:~3 & -- -,40 : -r f.-&4%Â£i~â€¢- â€¢ -- - il. - Â·Â·25-LE.91.Â·Â«1 - L ' - lit 1/1 im"~ - - TEâ‚¬' 621- - . - . 1 = r tlE-'. .1 Â£. ... Â¥ a h I * i ./- 1 # 1 1 1 22#.r1~ 0.1- 1 d Â¥L.. ) u U... / 4, -. . 1 11, Â¥5!/Zur--9 .. 10 FiFTH BTREET 7 -5 4 /6 / W .1 1 3 1 4c f ~ 5 ---4 a 1 T t__.,.4-1-Â·1 jmt----v -2- -1-214:1 E---- =, - t~71rR=;c 11 1 3 -- 1 : 1. r i Im 0 I 7) ~ I? Il Il __ E---./ Lj 1 1. 1 h M L~.~' m ALM'8â€¢6~LINd r _ &2Â«f k 1 ---- 1t n 1 1 11 1 11 ==72/ * i Ii Z ,*VlE.nel. 7 MZL 272.# - T_z_-__.17_7-7-7_1.- _ --0 -u- ...1-0 F. - t '~ ' 1 +LE 1 1.-- <8.1 61# 1 17 i Nt 1 luili d 1 Â· 1 42 71- -- R d MA , 9' _zi=:k: Xy 1 111 7 i. 1 .., VIL--- 11 r : Yht 4 99\ 0 -/ 6 530 W HALLAM 1, P g = ~ . . . F ... RZE VICTORIAN RENOVATION O I :,1% 530 W HALLAM STREET N 1 11 5 ASPEN, CO SITE PLAN - PROPOSED i www.Kir'Ralmon/Archltects.com te! 97O 925=2252 ornall kim.kral us 23.1/ .Â¥11/H LOT SIZE I 000 SF LOT SIZE 1 000 SF P .4 t" 5 I .: j. I 10111~ 1 _i_ Â»=:raaii-.FRE --1, 1- 8 0 m &22 11 1 01 01 1 0 - -- , 71 r a l- n I N ji: # 4 42 im CO Z 0 ----- 1.-0 --1---) 1 i 81 - --ID - - -0 li H g 1 2 i 530 W HALLAM ... VICTORIAN RENOVATION ~ A 530 W HALLAM STREET r ASPEN, CO EXISTING ELEVATIONS ; ' www.Kin'Ravinon/Architec:tÂ·..iÂ·i.in ' t.1970-925 2252 email kimenkrai.us O.e- L IL - .94 3 '~. DNI-LSIX3 1SV3 .c~...her.W. 1*2.â‚¬-1... C.lONSVI alcos 3-VC r: r ~5,-:1, m.*rA- 0 0% alâ‚¬ 4 c '~ |7] -01~~471 PU Ll,L' 8 9 j\Z\/-1:v.U --1- 8 1 -1 - 0 F !1[------ill m m T m 111 If~ 1 . lit '' 1 f" + '1'. 1 i D SET&,02â€¢;L +_1_2-2.2-1.-L Â»" PLIJÂ»_9 -- -_ ___ 0 6]3 ; I m '~jf <)[lillin-11 2.i 11 1 01. Mpit,J r K t:- -25 ye f:/ E n m Et] Ann n ? 1, ~ ..11=-0-Il 2-9-9-.---4 ) 1 Int 11 1. I.TBACK'll ,-' @ 0 aa G 4 P ual atil W 1 HI Â»il . e 1 0 0 'f I BEE#--- l.j~[-1--fl e .-~. ~ i'' i || V 530 W HALLAM VIM#U' - :*i U E-----1-1-74 VICTORIAN RENOVATION ~ A 5 1(j W HALLAM STREE i A ASPEN. CO 48119Fq K , PROPOSED FLOOR PLANS- VIC ,~1.1.1.11 Nrld 13A31 3ddn INOO2!038 46 13/ 31 EMO ........2 0 $6..0./.2-M 2:1 & 111 A * d 8 4111 e e 8 11 1 1171 1 e 93 -g I' ./ 9 11 0 f G 11 f- . 8 8 0 0 e e 44 /11 1,4- 148 1 ; RNIi I j 4 I p"W 0 530 W HALLAM S'-1." Sjewi M - - VICTORIAN RENOVATION hig!*t43:e C 'ti M~ 142 #i,; A g A ~,~' *liALLAMSHIfT - r ASPEN. CO 1- - SOUTH AND WEST EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS - VIC &*:i I I .NO- e DIA NOI1Â¥A313 1S3,V â€žaA,~â€¢v,G# LINK :r..1.1 e e e e 11 MEL EL; 14' ill O - 0 8 1 8 0 1 0, e L . 0 47"*9 530 W HALLAM 1,â€¢Id:Hi:# 5 M .Fl - - VICTORIAN RENOVATION il! 530 W HALLAM S T REET womt:i / I ' 4' ASPEN, CO NORTH AND EAST EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS - VIC c,WW DIA NOLLVT 313 1SVE NOI1Â¥/\313 HlhION OBT* ./ V... . All ./. - ./1 Neâ€¢. I ' TÂ»40~, Oal//SVI -05 22144 - I ., 0 1 E--7. -0813=~7-' + a - - - 91- 1.-tte -- c . 1:6 4 , 7, 1 / I T 1 ==r I ft i : : 1- 7 -]hal=J-=1 -F-;- I . -4- 1 1---- --Th cp wj'i 4 w i., ~i~t~i-IJI ,,~ 2.Â«,~ ,.~ ., .A - Â£ L---3 A C ./ 2. Ir. . 63 4/* E R C SE d# 3% NG i r U , r I 1, 70 .5 32-R >' 1. r Â· 4 3 J 0 (11 * ~ ]G,1 6, FEE| 1- ../ e ....1 1......1 , O [1 4 17312.- B e f L m H . : Â£ ninn n E , R . --lj~- 1, -kEEE]Irt -can~ B w , - 1, --7+ 3 t L...P-: ' 2 6 i I '|| m m râ‚¬ 0 ---T-- I I .44 : :IZZXS -1 U -11 r " fo 1. -7 JE 0 3 ; 0 + Â· 11- -7 m 1 . 71 J. 4 i M : 1 f- 13 7 24 1 i-FÂ« P i' 9- / 6 1, I /2 10 W Â» I 00 i . t., ~11 1 1 2 -1-__ , Aw ,Â£, ~~ ... 4 , râ€¢ ~Hi--2--5=2Â£_1Lit-| , Ld_ 910 ~ 530 W HALLAM VICTORIAN RENOVATION 530 W HA I. L AM b T REE T ,a,4~ 4 | '- F M.!12 :35 A- Al -= ASPEN. CO 41;ii* K i FAR CALCULATIONS - PROPOSED VICTORIAN 4!i!!NCE SNC)IlÂ¥-in v .u *3 13/.31 23MC-1 -921*gill ./. aaâ‚¬00/~c,-!viol .......1.5 ad.&.I li ./ .13~: '0 4 'FF " - 11 .M,01111 4 i 0 1 Ut -1 1 1 < #4 L" 111 0 1 - 1=1 3 Â« 0 510 Flifi ) 3 12 9 /,pt 1 11 1 1 , S r li i' 11 ~ '11 1 . U i NE m 1 , i 404 14 4 1 24339 17 4 H ft f\ i . 1 **11 1 01 00 16 li #41 4 1 159111:8~ ..3 BOW HALLAM VICTORIAN RENOVATION 3Am 530 WHALI AM STREE1 N ASPEN, CO 4419!64 K ' REVISED VICTORIAN, N/S STAIRS 3D VIEWS *Muh.%,AE@ Â·0-' - 14*11Â¥P P H.LS ENFOO ...1 p 1, M . 1.1/. 1 L G i 9% 9 9*41 c - 1 221 11 ~ Il I F* 7 12 1 4 EY UPWL Imi ~ r 1-9-=ri- i o F-.-iu 1.1 - * a 1 IM.22. 0 0 O *=1.1 . L L_| ----- & H.~f '' ..,f -L.." 13 9 I t' di r o -el- EM )2 1 Â£ 21 J A tfe -9 f IC==- . C Annn ' Affl~f~ --1 i : 1 1 [j' 1 T.; 1 x - 11 ......, I.'..-4 i:L3. m 1 - || n -2~ 1., 13 1 1 19) SET:/ITINE J , m I - 02 5 9 1 b ..9 11- f o -1 i liK . - :ME~ Ii.\J./ [14--11 1 T S pu 1 .- 0 1 1 1 0 =6=1 0 1 r ' 1 L .re . I./1 m ) I. m m r 1 1 Z *414:113' 530 W HALLAM 1 141 1 -------in VICTORIAN RENOVATION g b ..1 )WHALLAMST/81 i ASPEN. CO 4. A- -- '11Â®1 K i PROPOSED FLOOR PLAN - MODERN Whi 03'ON MOS Nyld 13A31 NI\41 Nt'ld 13A31 213/.401 4- 9Ugrsâ€¢'pâ€¢*". ; L-1-1 +H Hi irâ€žMMmB- 7. 31 0 0 e G Â® e 8 0 0 5 |l 0 0 _1 dl O Â» 701 Â° 1E-'71> O e \r=-7/ 0 e 40 0 0 7-1 = e O -1 9 530 W HALLAM .r. VICTORIAN RENOVATION Al'tii-: 1 i 530 W HALLAM STREET i.#W 1 ' ASPEN, CO Â¢1611 :1' -- SOUTH AND WEST ELEVATION -MOD 21.1.11 DIA NOI1VA31 HlnOS 00~N NO11VA313 193/A < e e 8 *11111%1114 - 11111111'11'1117/ 0 0 8 8 1 2 11 e e 0 [ 0 e 0 0 eli 0 LLiULUallU,1111111'11' d ~ ~ 0 Imm .... 530 W HALLAM 'ilit 1 ---------FYI VICTORIAN RENOVATION .. r 9,,11 5 530W HALLAM STREET ASPEN, CO 1.'11Â·"1111 . NORTH AND EAST ELEVATION - MOD imm K i 2==0.â€žr NOI1VA313 HlMON .. L.4 1 3 - 1 N = 1 1 28 64 ft 1:~ 1 ~:i -_2 2.111 s, ft 3*0Â§ 0*, : .... 1 Â· 7~T i E-14 1 @11 . 81 182~1 11qe,ft ... 11 Â· -1-Â·r.NEâ‚¬4â€ž -r-- ~ I , -Iâ€¢" 11 - I $ cH+Hi --- , ~ -- m-141.2,-~~~ ~~~ 1.Â·Â·~~~~~~~~, -Ill, 9 k 1Â®9 i 7-31â„¢ilifu - 11[al rH+Â¥44+44 22 11 _ b*e, *~_-1 . i , lilli 1 1 .1 L.1.Ill-! VI. i -it ~E,0 40!kâ€¢â€¢~Z~â€¢iâ€ž . Â·In â€¢L -1 1 - I .,2- ) Â·1 Mt. Â· i-. I *"al...---11 2-1-==m L=1 - ---3 - .= .*El - rjr-Ir . . I *.-L....,1 8 , 81 v 1 15 54 ft Ill 1 Rul: p_-j 4 2 I U L.--9 413 4 1.46.2 u , 111 , -EAL -2-- r~ 1-1 -9 p. ~ nu22212 1:i r 't,lit 4.21 OU J..... i = L il I 11 ' rE~~~~~~~ ~ 0 6*4 0 0 JO A LOWER LEVEL FAR-PROPOSED MAIN LE'VEL FAR- PRE 0.-El UPPER LEVEL FAR- PRLFOEED DATE |!Sa E 1 50Â·-TIC *.. t. - MODERN CALCULATIONS LOAE''Ell. :/0/3 2'-1/.:Il-%;. 124 SF MAIN -5 '. SR.68 '318/F u.mER./.5- 6/DIS . 10 9 INTERIC' PAR r'29 Scale 1 AS NOTÂ£/ ./INLE~/El 'ECKS FRONT POIC,4 14%$m -* . all ..... i. U 9 :E.....M' UPPER LEVEL DECKS lilliEXEMPT) ....6/ 547 *F (-315/XEMPTION; 2225F Al.2 TOT *PROPOBED'+ %Â·2Â·222Â· .434/0 INÂ¥11Â¥H M OES NOUVAON3kl NVIHODIA 133H1S MlllVH M 0Â£ 9 03 'N 3d SV Nhl3(IOIAI (]3SOdOWd - SNOI.1.Vln01Â¥3 743 t 8/.lii'l~r te---1...4/pb - 9.i - -W .2- -- 1~~ 1 AV r --' -Ii--./.* .. 2/ I. - La - ".4 r- 0 - J 1. 1~ #, m=-Iwir k. "6/1/.F'P#EAW . rwi'-I,-* #'*. I ./ -, 530 W HALLAM VICTORIAN RENOVATION 5.10 W HAL.LAM Slill 1 I ' ASPEN. CO Ng bilit i!/litimi K 1 STREETSCAPE ...'ll -3 ':':9 0 0 AFFIDAVIT OF PUBLIC NOTICE REQUIRED BY SECTION 26.304.060 (E),ASPEN LAND USE CODE ADDRESS OF PROPERTY: 9 40 UD,AA At_1- 46/1 br-r , Aspen, CO SCHEI*JLED PUBLIC HEARING DATE: i -)( A yl â‚¬- 9 C) A {1 , 20.15 STATE OF COLORADO ) ) SS. County of Pitkin ) 1, 14\ 04 1CA\/ >910 A *D (name, please print) being or representing an Applichnt to the City of Aspen, Colorado, hereby personally certify that I have complied with the public notice requirements of Section 26.304.060 (E) of the Aspen Land Use Code in the following manner: Publication of notice: By the publication in the legal notice section of an official paper or a paper of general circulation in the City of Aspen at least fifteen (15) days prior to the public hearing. A copy Of the publication is attached hereto. 4 Posting of notice: By posting of notice, which form was obtained from the /' Community Development Department, which was made of suitable, waterproof materials, which was not less than twenty-two (22) inches wide and twenty-six (26) inches high, and which was composed of letters not less than one inch in height. Said notice ras posted at least fifteen (15) days prior to the public hearing on the 4 day of Â£)41 01, 42- , 20 fb, to and including the date and time of the public hearing. A photograph of the posted notice (sign) is attached hereto. ~ Mailing of notice. By the mailing of a notice obtained from the Community c Development Department, which contains the information described in Section 26.304.060(E)(2) of the Aspen Land Use Code. At least fifteen (15) days prior to the public hearing, notice was hand delivered or mailed by first class postage prepaid U.S. mail to all owners of property within three hundred (300) feet of the property subject to the development application. The names and addresses of property owners shall be those on the current tax records of Pitkin County as they appeared no more than sixty (60) days prior to the date of the public hearing. A copy of the owners and governmental agencies so noticed is attached hereto. Neighborhood Outreach: Applicant attests that neighborhood outreach, summarized and attached, was conducted prior to the first public hearing as required in Section 26.304.035, Neighborhood Outreach. A copy of the neighborhood outreach summary, including the method of public notification and a copy of any documentation that was presented to the public is attached hereto. (continued on next page) .. Mineral Estate Owner Notice. By the certified mailing of notice, return receipt requested, to affected mineral estate owners by at least thirty (30) days prior to the date scheduled for the initial public hearing on the application of development. The names and addresses of mineral estate owners shall be those on the current tax records of Pitkin County. At a minimum, Subdivisions, SPAs or PUDs that create more than one lot, new Planned Unit Developments, and new Specially Planned Areas, are subject to this notice requirement. Rezoning or text amendment. Whenever the official zoning district map is in any way to be changed or amended incidental to or as part of a general revision of this Title, or whenever the text of this Title is to be amended, whether such revision be made by repeal of this Title and enactment of a new land use regulation, or otherwise, the requirement of an accurate survey map or other sufficient legal description of, and the notice to and listing of names and addresses of owners of real property in the area of the proposed change shall be waived. However, the proposed zoning map shall be available for public inspection in the planning agency during all business hours for fifteen (15) days prior to the public hearing on such amendments. *.-<//Brit pÂ«-Â·~Â· - Signature The foregoing "Affidavit of Notice" was acknowkdged before,ne this ~41ay of ]UAt io.19, by itÂ¢71 faif 10114 WITNESS MY HAND AND OFFICIAL SEAL KRISTIN PRIDE NOTARY PUBLIC 1 7/ 30//96 Â£ STATE OF COLORADO My commission expires: ~ NOTARY ID #20064029379 My Commission Expires July 30, 2018 4%44/404 Njjta* Public ATTACHMENTS AS APPLICABLE: â€¢ COPY OF THE PUBLICATION â€¢ PHOTOGRAPH OF THE POSTED NOTICE (SIGN) â€¢ LIST OF THE OWNERS AND GOVERNMENTAL AGENCIES NOTICED BY MAIL â€¢ APPLICANT CERTIFICATION OF MINERAL ESTAE OWNERS NOTICE AS REQUIRED BY C.R.S. Â§24-65.5-103.3 r .4,6 joi; 4/*2 -7:,2 .=Et W f'-#' r PUBLIC NOTIC= u Date: Monday, June 22,2015 6 -1 -5 Time: 5:00 p.m. Place: 130 S. Galena St., Aspen City Hall.Council Chamber r Â« Purpose: CoungÂ¢yvill consideraappplication r-u.4:â€¢,i Â· .Â· 0 \ , i '51 'J * rf, - ' f...lic.lebr'll::kill<Ler ~7 " I-:* + .Â· P . 4, U,k,11'*:. 2 2. r - 444,- -4. i 73 : 1/ .b ' - 44 PUBLIC NOnCE 2 #'1.46 4Â£1. 1.. a.- , 0. I U 4 -91. W. . . 3Â· AN :* d/m. 292-- a.l= f.1 t f ' Â· 1 fi ' 1 I * . 44 t: ....&14 4 "--DE â€¢ ....r' : 1...4 'EÂ»:Â· r,/% 2 . ' 318 FOURTH STREET LTD -323 N FIFTH ST LLC 501 WEST HALLAM LLC PO BOX 445 555 KATIE PARK LN PO BOX 3389 HOUSTON, TX 77001 SNOWMASS, CO 81654 VAIL, CO 81658 601 W HALLAM LLC 602 WEST HALLAM LLC 624 WEST FRANCIS LLC 121 S GALENA ST #203 17130 AVE LE RIVAGE 0133 PROSPECTOR RD #4102 B ASPEN, CO 81611 BOCA RATON, FL 33496 ASPEN, CO 81611 ASPEN HISTORICAL SOCIETY BLA[CH JANET S TRUST BLAICH ROBERT I TRUST 620 W BLEEKER ST 319 N FOURTH ST 319 N FOURTH ST ASPEN, CO 81611 ASPEN, CO 81611 ASPEN, CO 81611 BLUE MAGPIE LLC CITY OF ASPEN COLLETT JOHN & VIRGINIA C PO BOX 1268 130 S GALENA ST 1111 METROPOLITAN AVE #700 ASPEN, CO 81612 ASPEN, CO 81611 CHARLOTTE, NC 28204 COOK ROBERT C & MARSHA N DH HALLAM LLC EGGLESTON ROBERT H JR & TRACY H 621 W FRANCIS ST 2711 CENTERVILLE RD #400 434 W HALLAM ASPEN, CO 81611 WILMINGTON, DE 19808 ASPEN, CO 81611 FISCHER SISTIE GLENN SALLY RAE HENRY KRISTEN 442 W BLEEKER 504 W HALLAM AVE 525 W HALLAM ST ASPEN, CO 81611 ASPEN, CO 81611 ASPEN, CO 81611-1246 HILLMAN DORA B TRUST HILLMAN TATNALL L REV TRUST JONES STEPHEN M TRUST V 504 W BLEEKER 504 W BLEEKER ST 807 LAS CIMAS PKWY #370 ASPEN, CO 81611 ASPEN, CO 81611 AUSTIN, TX 78746 KAFRISSEN ARTHUR & CAROLE KEY R BRILL & ELIZABETH R LAWSON MICHELLE R 310 N 6TH ST 715 W MAIN #304 106 S MILL ST STE 202 ASPEN, CO 81611 ASPEN, CO 81611 ASPEN, CO 81611 LEVINE THEODORE A TRUST MAGGOS LAURA P MCCAUSLAND LINDA REV TRUST 425 E 58TH ST #25H 317 NORTH 4TH ST 609 W FRANCIS ST NEW YORK, NY 10022 ASPEN, CO 81611 ASPEN, CO 81611 MINERS CABIN LLC MOSS CHARLES B JR MUSSELMAN JAMES & JULIANNE 403 ALEXANDER RD 1530 BROADWAY 8401 N CENTRAL EXPRESSWAY #400 LENOIR CITY, TN 37772 NEWYORK, NY 10036 DALLAS, TX 75225 NATIONWIDE THEATRES CORP -DXLEY DEBBY M 50% 9 <LEY JOHN C TRUSTEE 50% 120 N ROBERTSON BLVD 1300 WILLIAMS TOWER I 1437 S BOULDER AVE #770 LOS ANGELES, CA 90048 TULSA, OK 74103 TULSA, OK 74119 PACIFIC DEVELOPMENT GROUP LLC PDT PARTNERS LLC PURPLE MAGPIE LLC C/O SALLY TISCHER 601 E HYMAN AVE PO BOX 1268 PO BOX 1804 ASPEN, CO 81611 ASPEN, CO 81612 HEALDSBRUG, CA 95448 SHAFROTH ASPEN HOUSE LLC SHELBY LLC SWANSON LUCIA TRUST 3367 SUNSHINE CANYON DR 1201 WILLIAMS ST #6 425 E 58TH ST #25H BOULDER, CO 80302 DENVER, CO 80218 NEW YORK, NY 10022 TISCHLER SALLY MANAGEMENT TRUST URIPIS LLC VES TRUST 50% PO BOX 1804 600 W FRANCIS SWEENEY JOHN F TRUST 50% HEALDSBURG, CA 95448 ASPEN, CO 81611 1260 IVANHOE ST DENVER, CO 80220 WARE NINA COULTER LIV TRUST WHITE MAGPIE LLC WILKE LIVING TRUST 13021 KING ARTHUR SPUR PO BOX 1268 626 W FRANCIS SAINT LOUSI, MO 68146 ASPEN, CO 81612 ASPEN, CO 81611 WOGAN WENDY 533 W FRANCIS ASPEN, CO 81611 ~,Fl~ ~ c 0 0 AFFIDAVIT OF PUBLIC NOTICE REQUIRED BY SECTION 26.304.060 (E), ASPEN LAND USE CODE ADDRESS OF PROPERTY: 6'30 00 - A.LLIC A-6/,A- th- - 49 C , Aspen, CO SCHEDULED PUBLIC HEARING DATE: Â£1cyÂ·,Â©cui Jw1A7l @. 5: rin , 20(5- STATE OF COLORADO ) ) SS. County of Pitkin ) I, 4-72~ %6-n (name, please print) being or representing an Applicant to the City of Aspen, Colorado, hereby personally certify that I have complied with the public notice requirements of Section 26.304.060 (E) of the Aspen Land Use Code in the following manner: (/'Publication of notice: By the publication in the legal notice section of an official paper or a paper of general circulation in the City of Aspen at least fifteen (15) days prior to the public hearing. A copy of the publication is attached hereto. Posting of notice: By posting of notice, which form was obtained from the Community Development Department, which was made of suitable, waterproof materials, which was not less than twenty-two (22) inches wide and twenty-six (26) inches high, and which was composed of letters not less than one inch in height. Said notice was posted at least fifteen (15) days prior to the public hearing on the day of , 20 , to and including the date and time of the public hearing. A photograph of the posted notice (sign) is attached hereto. Mailing of notice. By the mailing of a notice obtained from the Community Development Department, which contains the information described in Section 26.304.060(E)(2) of the Aspen Land Use Code. At least fifteen (15) days prior to the public hearing, notice was hand delivered or mailed by first class postage 1 r prepaid U.S. mail to all owners of property within three hundred (300) feet of the IN' property subject to the development application. The names and addresses of 4 ' property owners shall be those on the current tax records of Pitkin County as they appeared no more than sixty (60) days prior to the date of the public hearing. A copy of the owners and governmental agencies so noticed is attached hereto. Neighborhood Outreach: Applicant attests that neighborhood outreach, summarized and attached, was conducted prior to the first public hearing as required in Section 26.304.035, Neighborhood Outreach. A copy of the neighborhood outreach summary, including the method of public notification and a copy of any documentation that was presented to the public is attached hereto. (continued on next page) .. Mineral Estate Owner Notice. By the certified mailing of notice, return receipt requested, to affected mineral estate owners by at least thirty (30) days prior to the date scheduled for the initial public hearing on the application of development. The names and addresses of mineral estate owners shall be those on the current tax records of Pitkin County. At a minimum, Subdivisions, SPAs or PUDs that create more than one lot, new Planned Unit Developments, and new Specially Planned Areas, are subject to this notice requirement. Rezoning or text amendment. Whenever the official zoning district map is in any way to be changed or amended incidental to or as part of a general revision o f this Title, or whenever the text o f this Title is to be amended, whether such revision be made by repeal of this Title and enactment of a new land use regulation, or otherwise, the requirement of an accurate survey map or other sufficient legal description of, and the notice to and listing of names and addresses of owners of real property in the area of the proposed change shall be waived. However, the proposed zoning map shall be available for public inspection in the planning agency during all business hours for fifteen (15) days prior to the public hearing on such amendments. Signatife The foregoing "Affidavit of Notice" was acknowledged before me this 9 day of..jw,-.e- , 20/5, by :Angâ‚¬-4. Sc_=Â»--c--7 PUBLIC NOTICE RE:530 W. HALLAM STREET- HISTORIC LANDMARK LOT SPLIT NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that a public hearing WITNESS MY HAND AND OFFICIAL SEAL will be held on Monday, June 22, 2015, at a meet- ing to begin at 5:00 p.m. before the Aspen City Council Council Chambers, City Hall, 130 S. Gale- na St., Aspen to consider an application submitted by 530 Hallam LLC, 0133 Prospector Lane, Ste. My commission expires: Clile Â£ 1 92 41028, Aspen, CO 81611, affecting the property at 530 W. Hallam, Lots K, L, and M, Block 28, City and Townsite of Aspen, Colorado, Parcel ID#2735-124-25-004. The applicant is requesting approval to subdivide the lot for the construction of tuta 2Â£04 Prtl--O,/94 - a new home. For further information, contact Amy Simon at the City of Aspen Community Develop- Notary Public ment Department, 130 S. Gatena St., Aspen, CO, L (970) 429-2758, amy.simon @cityofaspen.com. KAREN REED PATTERSON s/ Steven Skadron, Mayor NOTARY PUBLIC Aspen City Council STATE OF COLORADO Published in the Aspen Times on June 4, 2015 (11238698) NOTARY ID #19964002767 29~ ACD"' Ii..â€ž- ATTACHMENTS AS APPLICABLE: My Commission Expres February 15, 2016 â€¢ COPY OF THE PUBLICATION â€¢ PHOTOGRAPH OF THE POSTED NOTICE (SIGN) â€¢ LIST OF THE OWNERS AND GOVERNMENTAL AGENCIES NOTICED BY MAIL â€¢ APPLICANT CERTIFICATION OF MINERAL ESTAE OWNERS NOTICE AS REQUIRED BY C.R.S. Â§24-65.5-103.3 .. MEMORANDUM TO: Mayor Skadron and City Council THRU: Chris Bendon, Community Development Director FROM: Amy Simon, Historic Preservation Officer RE: 530 W. Hallam Historic Landmark Lot Split, Second Reading of Ordinance #10, Series of 2015 DATE: April 13,2015 SUMMARY: 530 W. Hallam is a Victorian era home with 1970s and 1980s additions to the east and rear. The applicant proposes to demolish the non-historic additions, move the house front and west, towards the corner, and add on. The lot is to be subdivided so that the open yard on the east side of the Victorian can be developed with a new home. The allowed floor area for the project is the same as would be permitted for a duplex or two detached houses on the property with no subdivision involved. b Kti . 92#= ie~ 43 -- ; 4. 1- - --- 4 --/%3h..&~ ~90& 'lilli ...e -illi--' --U.. I- . I D... 8- Top left: The house in approximately the '. f# *4 vaM. 1~ 0,1 1950s. i . I I 4 v...3 Top right: The house in 1980, with a one 4 2. 5 f story addition that altered the original 1 ''. '. &-Â¥. ' design. A-r i 4-Al e Â·Â° . . ~ Left: The site is now inundated with trees Â·1 that were planted in the right of way. The V. f# City Forester has reviewed the property and 4 - r . â€¢ - has indicated that two trees should be . t .: s..6Â·3.2.=*46- removed because of declining health and overcrowding. .. APPLICANT: 530 Hallam, LLC, represented by Kim Raymond Architects. PARCEL ID: 2735-124-25-004. ADDRESS: 530 W. Hallam, Lots K, L, and M, Block 28, City and Townsite of Aspen, Colorado. ZONING: R-6. HISTORIC LANDMARK LOT SPLIT The split of a lot that is a designated Historic Landmark for the purpose of creating one additional development parcel shall be approved. approved with conditions, or denied by the City Council, pursuant to Section 26.480.030 - Procedures for Review, after a recommendation is provided by the flistoric Preservation Commission pursuant to Section 26.415.110(A) Historic Landmark Lot Split, and according to the following standards: 1. The request complies with the requirements of Section 26.480.040, General Subdivision Review Standards. A. Guaranteed Access to a Public Way. All subdivided lots must have perpetual unobstructed legal vehicular access to a public way. A proposed subdivision shall not eliminate or obstruct legal vehicular access from a public way to an adjacent property. All streets in a Subdivision retained under private ownership shall be dedicated to public use to ensure adequate public and emergency access. Security/privacy gates across access points and driveways are prohibited. B. Alignment with Original Townsite Plat. The proposed lot lines shall approximate, to the extent practical. the platting of the Original Aspen lownsite, and additions thereto, as applicable to the subject land. Minor deviations from the original platting lines to accommodate significant features of the site may be approved. C. Zoning Conformance. All new lots shall conform to the requirements of the zone district in which the property is situated, including variations and variances approved pursuant to this Title. A single lot shall not be located in more than one zone district unless unique circumstances dictate. A rezoning application may be considered concurrently with subdivision review. D. Existing Structures, Uses, and Non-Conformities. A subdivision shall not create or increase the non-conformity of a use, structure or parcel. A rezoning application or other mechanism to correct the non-conforming nature of a use, structure, or parcel may be considered concurrently. 530 W. Hallam Page 2 of4 .. In the case where an existing structure or use occupies a site eligible for subdivision, the structure need not be demolished and the use need not be discontinued prior to application for subdivision. If approval of a subdivision creates a non-conforming structure or use, including a structure spanning a parcel boundary, such structure or use may continue until recordation of the subdivision plat. Alternatively, the City may accept certain assurance that the non-conformities will be remedied after recordation of the subdivision plat. Such assurances shall be reflected in a development agreement or other legal mechanism acceptable to the City Attorney and may be time-bound or secured with a financial surety. b 12 4 i, ./ Staff Response: The application, to split the lot into one 4,150 M 1 square foot lot, containing a relocated Victorian home, and one N K 1 L 1 /6/ 4,850 square foot lot, containing a new home, meets the criteria ' above. According to the 1904 Sanborn Fire Insurance map at , ~ ~~-~~ right, there were two houses on the subject property iii the J , Victorian era. wl r - 2. The fathering parcel is listed in the Inventory of 4 Â· Historic Sites and Structures. 2 1 1 7,2 Staff Response: The parcel is listed on the Inventory of 7 Historic Sites and Structures. 4 524 5,2 90 32 dEf 24 : 3. No more than two lots are created by the Historic Landmark Lot Split. No more than one historic landmark lot split shall occur on any one fathering parcel. Staff Response: Two lots are created. 4. In residential zone districts, the allowable Floor Area for each new residential lot shall be established by allocating the total allowable Floor Area of the fathering parcel to each of the new lots such that no overall increase in Floor Area is achieved and no individual lot allows a Floor Area in excess of that allowed a similarly-sized lot in the same zone district. An equal distribution is not required. The allowable Floor Area for each new lot shall be noted on the Historic Lot Split Plat. Any Floor Area bonus already granted by the Historic Preservation Commission shall be allocated to each individual parcel and shall also be noted on the plat as a square footage bonus. If the properties remain eligible for a Floor Area bonus from the Historic Preservation Commission, the plat and subdivision agreement shall specify the manner in which this potential bonus shall be allocated to the two properties if received. In non-residential zones districts, the Floor Area shall be calculated according to the limitations of the zone district applied to each new lot as permitted for the use. 530 W. Hallam Page 3 0 f 4 .. The total Floor Area shall not be stated on the plat because the floor area will be determined by the use established on each parcel. Staff Response: The allowable floor area on the fathering (existing) parcel is 4,080 square feet. The applicant proposes to split that, plus a 500 square foot floor area bonus granted by HPC, approximately 45% to the Victorian home and 55% to the new home. The floor area for the project is only about 700 square feet more than exists in the single family home on the site today. 5. The Historic Lot Split Plat shall be reviewed and recorded in the office of the Pitkin County Clerk and Recorder, pursuant to Chapter 26.490 - Approval Documents. No subdivision agreement need be prepared or entered into between the applicant and the City unless the Community Development Director determines such an agreement is necessary. Staff Response: The plat will be filed subsequent to historic landmark lot split approval by City Council. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff and HPC recommend Council support the proposed Historic Landmark Lot Split. RECOMMENDED MOTION: "I move to adopt Ordinance #10, Series of 2015." CITY MANAGER COMMENTS: EXHIBITS: Ordinance #10, Series of 2015 Exhibit A: Application 530 W. Hallam Page 4 0 f 4 .. ORDINANCE #10 (Series of 2015) AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ASPEN, COLORADO APPROVING A HISTORIC LANDMARK LOT SPLIT FOR THE PROPERTY LOCATED AT 530 W. HALLAM, LOTS K, L, AND M, BLOCK 28, CITY AND TOWNSITE OF ASPEN, COLORADO PARCEL ID #: 2735-124-25-004 WHEREAS, the applicant. 530 Hallam. LLC, represented by Kim Raymond Architects, has requested a Historic Landmark Lot Split for the property located at 530 W. Hallam, Lots K, L, and M, Block 28, City and Townsite of Aspen, Colorado; and WHEREAS, for City Council approval of a Ilistoric Landmark Lot Split, the application shall meet the requirements of Municipal Code Section 26.480.060.B regarding Minor Subdivision; and WHEREAS, at their regular meeting on February 11, 2015, the Historic Preservation Commission considered the application, found the application was consistent with the review standards, and recommended City Council approval, with conditions, by a vote of 4 to 0: and WHEREAS, Amy Simon, Historic Preservation Officer, in her staff report to City Council, performed an analysis of the application, found that the review standards for Historic Landmark Lot Split are met. and recommended approval; and WHEREAS, the City Council finds that the proposal meets or exceeds all applicable development standards and that the approval of the development proposal is consistent with the goals and elements of the Aspen Area Community Plan; and, WHEREAS, the City Council finds that this Ordinance furthers and is necessary for the promotion of public health, safety, and welfare. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ASPEN, COLORADO, THAT: Section 1: Historic Landmark Lot Split Pursuant to the findings set forth in Section 1, above, the City Council does hereby grant a Historic Landmark Lot Split for 530 W. Hallam, Lots K, L, and M, Block 28, City and Townsite of Aspen, Colorado with the following conditions: 1. The Historic Lot Split Plat shall be reviewed and recorded in the office of the Pitkin County Clerk and Recorder, pursuant to Chapter 26.490 - Approval Documents. No subdivision agreement need be prepared or entered into between the applicant and the City. The Plat shall: 530 W. Hallam Ordinance #10, Series of 2015 - Page 1 of 3 .. a. Contain a plat note stating that no further subdivision may be granted for these lots nor will additional units be built without receipt of applicable approvals pursuant to the provisions of the Land Use Code in effect at the time of application; b. Contain a plat note stating that all new development on the lots will conform to the dimensional requirements o f the zone district, except for any approved variances; and c. Be labeled to indicate that the maximum floor area allowed on Lot 1, a 4,150 square foot lot containing the Victorian home, is 2,138 square feet and on Lot 2, a 4,850 square foot lot containing new home, is 2,442 square feet. Section 2: Severability If any section, subsection, sentence, clause, phrase or portion o f this ordinance is for any reason held invalid or unconstitutional in a court of competent jurisdiction, such portion shall be deemed a separate. distinct and independent provision and shall not affect the validity of the remaining portions thereof. Section 3: Existing Litigation This ordinance shall not have any effect on existing litigation and shall not operate as an abatement of any action or proceeding now pending under or by virtue of the ordinances amended as herein provided, and the same shall be construed and concluded under such prior ordinances. Section 4: Vested Rights The Land Use entitlements granted herein shall be vested for a period of three (3) years from the date of issuance of a development order. However, any failure to abide by any of the terms and conditions attendant to this approval shall result in the forfeiture of said vested property rights. Unless otherwise exempted or extended, failure to properly record all plats and agreements required to be recorded, as specified herein, within 180 days of the effective date of the development order shall also result in the forfeiture of said vested property rights and shall render the development order void within the meaning of Section 26.104.050 (Void permits). Zoning that is not part of the approved site-specific development plan shall not result in the creation of a vested property right. No later than fourteen (14) days following final approval of all requisite reviews necessary to obtain a development order as set forth iii this Ordinance, including Final Major Development by the I IPC, the City Clerk shall cause to be published in a newspaper of general circulation within the jurisdictional boundaries of the City of Aspen, a notice advising the general public of the approval of a site specific development plan and creation of a vested property right pursuant to this Title. Such notice shall be substantially in the following form: Notice is hereby given to the general public of the approval of a site specific development plan, and the creation of a vested property right. valid for a period of three (3) years, pursuant to the Land Use Code of the City of Aspen and Title 24, Article 68. Colorado Revised Statutes, pertaining to the following described property: 530 W. Hallam, Lots K, L, and M, Block 28, City and Townsite of Aspen, Colorado. 530 W. Hallam Ordinance #10, Series of 2015 Page 2 of 3 .. Nothing in this approval shall exempt the development order from subsequent reviews and approvals required by this approval of the general rules, regulations and ordinances or the City of Aspen provided that such reviews and approvals are not inconsistent with this approval. The approval granted hereby shall be subject to all rights of referendum and judicial review; the period of time permitted by law for the exercise of such rights shall not begin to run until the date of publication of the notice of final development approval as required under Section 26.304.070(A). The rights of referendum shall be limited as set forth in the Colorado Constitution and the Aspen Home Rule Charter. Section 5: Public Hearing A public hearing on the ordinance shall be held on the 13th day of April, 2015, in the City Council Chambers, Aspen City Hall, Aspen, Colorado, fifteen (15) days prior to which hearing a public notice of the same was published in a newspaper of general circulation within the City of Aspen. INTRODUCED, READ AND ORDERED PUBLISHED as provided by law, by the City Council of the City of Aspen on the 9th day of March, 2015. Steven Skadron. Mayor ATTEST: Linda Manning. City Clerk FINALLY, adopted, passed and approved this day of .2015. Steven Skadron, Mayor ATTEST: Kathryn Koch, City Clerk APPROVED AS TO FORM: James R. True, City Attorney 530 W. Hallam Ordinance #10, Series of 2015 Page 3 of 3 'Lo Â· 249Â£ 4. Atifc' ATTACHMENT 2 -LAND USE APPLICATION PROJECT: Name: 5'3~, UALLAÂ»n L LL(L - â‚¬f-.AbvA-1-tug //,0-f 59(.107- &/ Location: 57,0 1014/JLLAW? 40*4,1 nA.-) 12â‚¬5 1 17Â£nct (Indicate street address, lot & block nu~nber, legal description where appropriate) Parcel ID # (REQUIRED) 2-7 5 9 - 424- 2 5- 06 2-l APPLICANT: Name: 5-30 1-1Â·Al-.0,4,11, LLA uft*12.-C FF,lf:PLAY-ip, pplaF. Address: 0133 '212697*CIE 7 47>El!Â£ LA S'FEK) â‚¬742 d Phone #: 920- 11 50 REPRESENTATIVE: Name 1.< i Yvi 12/4.N)FFAn n ry /412 CA 1-12 651~9, ) h 6 Address: (,i'33 9>BrdyealkÂ¥.- Sull--E-- 4/0-2>(' 1 43'FEn .Phone #: 1 24 - 7,39 2- TYPE OF APPLICATION: (please check all that apply): C] GMQS Exemption E] Conceptual PUD ~ Temporary Use U GMQS Allotment E] Final PUD (& PUD Amendment) U l'ext/Map Amendment E Special Review U Subdivision U Conceptual SPA D ESA -8040 Greenline, Stream E] Subdivision Exemption (includes ~ Final SPA (& SPA Margin, Hallam Lake Bluff, condominiumization) Amendment) Mountain View Plane El Commercial Design Review [@' Lot Split/N; 5-rbpi C E Small Lodge Conversion/ Expansion Ef Residential Design Variance U Lot Line Adjustment R Other: HRO ~ Conditional Use EXISTING CONDmONS: (description of existing buildings, uses, previous approvals, etc.) f>i,04 Lf. FA,41169 61-1501*L 13Â¢St ;57/Lp, Of, ki ji Fl,U)+7 fpiLLS **Flito )4 5 Bid A LAvt,OYMM-icÂ· 7,?4-T y r~(tp. 0-1- 19 73 PROPOSAL: (description of proposed buildings, uses, modifications, etc.) Ae,mA/*Â·TA 41540)6 5,1-Bucrl'G Â·Â¢ej'22-kno Kekleprl- 4171)11-/ar,3, JtÂ®v/ZÂ· WI 570,010 luÂ»q-40211,6,1 2 RE#%/ 661 6961<f 3 ng.t,y;,w.(al.Â¢-Â· fiftÂ»~t..I \A-01 lE- Have you attached the following? FEESDUE: $ 1Â£14 - IN Pre-Application Conference Summary E[ Attachment #1, Signed Fee Agreenient ~~ Response to Attachment #3, Dimensional Requirements Form Response to Attachment #4, Submittal Requirenients- Including Written Responses to Review Standards I~ 3-D Model for large project All plans thatare larger than 8.5" X ll"must be folded. A disk with an eleâ‚¬tric copy ofall written text (Microsoft Word Format) must be submitted as part of the application. Large scale projects should include an electronic 3-D model. Your pre-application conference summary will indicate ifyou must submit a 3-D model. .. â„¢1 -- - - - 11 'PROVEME'..R. PLAT Of 530 W. HALLAM STREET SECTION 12, TOWNSHIP 10 SOUTH, RANGE 85 WEST OF THE 6th P.M. LOTS K, L & M, BLOCK 28 CITY & TOWNSITE OF ASPEN COUNTY OF PITKIN, STATE OF COLORADO SHEET 1 OF 2 294,5Â»'* 1.70:-*"44.44 VICINITÂ¥ MAP m'~â€¢ic- T:&.UW..VI'ir&'*.7â€žUN..0H.0,/'- 1 ,/1 1/1, I ..i~, KI .I. L.r. ./Â·. Wn= PROPERTY DESCRIPTION ....10//0 5/237, I 1/ FOUNoIlo~~a~~Di~~RUO .*#- {IL.~.'......L'*..e.,~, 'n.,r, 'ee SURVEY NOTES IT- 1..:.: EF / irâ€ž,9.r / 1 0/TE'Frlâ‚¬~WORK ..14Â·15/.DIPTE...3 .14 '1:31: / 2 DATEOFPÂ«tp#ON ./ANDS....Noll 8 + 3, 8..OF'.ING A 'ARING.F.80'414 F.'WEENTIESOUTIWITCOHNER A . ==r . 0, 0 ... 50UTHEASTCORNER#ARK'SADD,rIONWBOM%,ONIMONUMENTED~T,IAND ~ 0+ 'OCK 28 (MONUMeNT ED aY A 1 ' PIPE WITH AN UNUARKED NETAL CAP) AND TH' RE8AA WrIANILLEGIeLECAP) 4, 8~,SOFS.R.YIDOCUIE'ISPÂ£RCOUN./CORDS, â„¢EHITORICLANDMARK .T SPLIT AT S33 W 'RANCI STREET SU00!VISION EXEMPTION PLAT RECO.. jANUARY 24.2003 AS RL.[PnONNO 4777CG. T}IL IMPROVEMENTANDTOPOGRAPIIIC SURVOOF LOTS A. 8. ANDC. 'OCK 28 ORIGINAL .PEN TOWNSITE DEPOSITED MAÂ¥ I. n .i- '==,&/7.=' RECEPTIONNO 230437. THE OFFICIALUAPO;THE CITYOf ASPEN. PREPA~EOUYG E 1000 ~RECEFTION NO Â«,863 â„¢ECON[*)Altl,IUM UAPOF[LARICS ADDITION T}liCON'IMINIUM MAPOF.LANK5 ADDITION .CORIED'AN./.26 1981. .CORDED JULV 18 1950ASRkCipTIONNO 22'5432. r,(ti,RS, Supp~MiNTA - 0 S.Unt- 1 - - 8UCHANAN DATEDDECEMe. 15. 1959: CrTY. A5PEN OPSCONTROX MONUMENTAnONMAPPREPAREO6Â¥M~C]NENCINEERINGUC DATEDDECEMBER' 2009 VA~IOUS= NISO~RECOAD ~NDIHt~OUNOMONUUÂ£NTS 0OWN I TMISSUR....'IOTCONS....Tr.........50,".GINEENING.~LC{SE, TOOFTER'INEOWN..IP. E.E.ENTS'FRECORD FOR AU INFORUATION ./.INGE~EMENT~ RIGHTS oF w.*0/[Â»1 mit .......RtutoupoN rit 1 ....Al........le. DIN .0/ 4........ COM'.MENT PRE.... r ====1 2014 Plâ„¢NCOUNT,TrTU.INC.CA5ENO PCT24113WMTHANEFFECTMOATEOF JUL,10 6, 8.,SOFEIVATION TH.009/1. OPASPENMARCINCONTRILDATUI.1 WH,(IIi ir n i 11 ~ 1 i 11 1 ~AaDONAN ELEVAnONOF 7720- INAVD 1988IONTHi NGSSTAnON->159Â« nil PROOUCED A LOCU ITI ./.MARI~ AT â„¢E SOWâ„¢WEST CORNER . THE SUBJECT -OP.. SHO# ..l CONTOU. ...Al ISON'll.OT SURVEYOR'SCERTIFICATE IMARKS,0ECKLE. HE.....1.70/1/FROTH...HOUS' ICACOLOUDO ......r. COMPANÂ¥: ASPE.5TA~W~IrrIW-m#m'VT~r[-ir GRAPHIC SCALE THATâ„¢,3,5.-IMPROVE.ENTSU-IP./.DEANEDS.I"....{9L AN. . TIATIT..MON"IENTED.NOSINVEÂ¥.O.NG THECURRENTLOCATION'FAU I.~TURES,WATERCOURWS WATERFEATURESAND/OR//IES.FIATER,F~OOD UIN 'SIS~EROADS TUI. UTKITIES ~ENCES HE~ES ORWA~LSSITUATEDONTHE 11'FEET' DE5CM]e,O,ANCa AND W!â„¢IN FM FEET OR ALLBOUNDA,IES Of SWCH PARCEL ANY CONFUSING nOUNOANY EVIDENCE OR VISIBLf ENCROACHM,NIS AND AUEA56Mt,(TS ANDRIGHTSOF WAÂ¥0FAPU8Llcoll PmVATE NATUAETHA~AREVISIULE. ORAPPAANT OROFRECOADANOUNDERGROONOUT,UTIESOESCRIBEDÂ»,PITKINMUNTy TAE iNCÂ·i SOPRIS ENGINEERING -LLC TITLEINSURANCECASENO PCT~1~~WOROTHEASOURCESASSPEOFIECONTHE IMPROVEMEN~5URVEÂ¥PUT CiVMLCONSUL IANI 502 MA!/ STREET, SUM AB -. -IWI ./.K ISECK" . â€¢28643 CARBONDALE COLORADO 81623 (9703 704 0311 SOPRISENG@SOPR'ENG COM .~.L1L~~0 .f~â€¢ 4 M f Â¢44 .. --- 1&11190Â·.EMEIT SUR.EY PLAT OF 530 W. HALLAM STREET SECTION 12, TOWNSHIP 10 SOUTH, RANGE 85 WEST OF THE 6th P.M. LOTS K, L & M, BLOCK 28 CITY & TOWNSITE OF ASPEN COUNTY OF PITKIN, STATE OF COLORADO SHEET 2 OF] LOT' LOT 2 LOTD REC NO 477706 REC. NO.477706 .%./.Â· :Â·.9/5.4:/.-19-Â« EXISTING CONDITIONS LEGEND ' .1 I I ' 2ib7' RIGHT OF WAY , I. I I CATVPÂ·Â©el. 1 I _~_bLL___ MAVE[SURFA . .....PED.-A .,~ *<i*C~C.U.-ILG~Â£0' --.-3: ..94 -0 _ L. 18&. ,~r~O ~~FÂ»~,M~ C 2- C GA~,LU. . - 427- + 0 0-0- /0*;ENCE 45 *.'-,1 -41'...1-J - L 1 Ohi.=.E' ~ SINGLE FAM LY MULTI LEVEL -1 i WOOD FF AME HOUSE . Jxt-'U 1 '' 530* 1ALLAM ST. -,-4~ - __,11_ Ji- a,000 .Q. pr 0/ .~'-lh z- | "L ja~-9 C-n" 0.20' AC. +/-c~0Â£~(**~~ - N /T /rm 11'- . I\\ 2,0- *iumrn. LOTN =j 4731 i / =n.h~ 1 - -*4 tÂ»"1 1 10&21 A LOT K ; I ./' ct~*ous b ,-CO mOJ' rh.1 6 (,59 EAUOUS - I r u ' 11 B LI -791,- L'**&%*,I =2777: HALLAM STREET 74.38' RIGHT OF WAY GRA.ICSCALE ASPHALTSURFACE <C-%~ I.)- 4,#95&2~-~ lilli SOPRISENGINEERING-LLC UVILLONSUCTINT- 502 MAIN STREET. SUITE A3 I CARBONDALE' COL0RADO 816Z3 (970) 704 0311 5/PRIENG@SOPRI"NICOl on noT 5T1I5TRFET ASPHALT SURFACE 76.24' RGHT OF WA .. 1...' U CON :RET~~)RFACE (TYP.1 - O 0 l U ______1 W In# -/Â· B -- El lt, 21 -1. lÂ®mmi - ml Umm 4 . _- 4--<D I . r WINDOWWELL 911.,HA 14 4 i f illl-Â» 1,5 4 scift . 1 1 11 \ /1 If lili â‚¬ 1 - 1 1 1 2,2'94 saft ". ./RAM/4 SEALED OFF APPARENT ~ -- # ---I- - .B- *'11 TIF AFTAINING.'11 f BASEMENT OR CRAWLSPAC' ACCESS/COAL CHUTE , Diffs 1 1 -11 2 .Elltl__~~_:I . ~ r---I . .1 - 111-1 .- A , / ] i la ~=2â‚¬ -lili Ill[ 1- p - '711111 ,[IZ_-4 t - e .'4 I ,milili I 0 6 29 0 ~ UPPER LEVEL DEMO MAIN LEVEL DEMO e DATE |SAL 5p'- 6- -0.El LE ill NOT NC~UPS' IN CALCULA~rIONS 4.,4/45. E~<,81"02"Â· 1â€¢lÂ· i"Â·".20).""SF CE'/18/Â·1~4Â·13~ 44. 11~ %1111 UPPE~ a8'/EL Ell//1//fl'llâ€¢/22.1./.IF 0% 685â€¢712â€¢ 4573. |||lilli 1 Q -0-A_ExerN6 Els-/6 4330/F -MO 313,9/ ~ 2443 3F /33-6 -1246 ZOE<; I] 111 =*Id .- _Illl'111 A 1.4 LOWER LEVEL DEMO ril nT 1 C'NOI//AVU 1//1,1 INVTIVH M OES ILLVAON3H NVIHOIDIA 1 3 3 Il S INV 11V H M OES 00'N 3dSV SO1VO OF\I30 ,* ~00 * U1... . 1 -ili'Evilli/*all/, -- 2-- - . -m 1314 *fa,Ar + 7 i â€¢3 /* 7.--2- - 6- N Il , -- - lip 1*1 1:.Vi.~.~ 1_ - _ -. - w 045-,a -. - - a 11 -* 2--- I - . Iz j . Â¢**01 -2.7-ky d I 1 f' i - I i Vi::'.16 li 1 1 A . t~41'}1 + /1/TH STREET 2 4 9 1 c A L 4Â«91 Â·~ ' %2 rl< _lu 1 I r F------7 1: 1 1- i : 1 -- , 1,-11 1/ I R 1 -Ii---0 , 111 1 2 18 1 11 mmE 1/ 1 0} i =- Â«1-9 - 1. 1 9.---- ' 1, -/P'lfi-_0 .. #14Â¢3~ 1 ----- ~ .-V) I *-/ ,111Â· %%.U 4 UL--1 14Â»-tfu I f1 i Â» 11 530 W HALLAM . VICTORIAN RENOVATION A - 53D W HALLAM STREET ASPEN. CO SITE PLAN - PROPOSED tol l/0-925-2252 einall kirnâ‚¬,1.1.11 uh www Kirn "vrn,inc/ArrÂ·hitects coin ALLEY LOT SIZE (1,060 9 NÂ¥ld 3116 12~ILS Ml-1Â¥H I.T .zE q 0/0 9 0]1ONS.| Â·dns 11 f 4 1 48 d dA I 4 H I . :Ii 1 r--- I Nf Igi - -0 00 1-6 - 3 -r - f d ME i I .0 W . 51 : rn ---1,&*=--Thl i: E; i t) wr~ . @.E 2% 3 -- .., -m .X 8~ ;2 H R. 195 0 COM_jb d*68 ; Ll.'--Â«f {--- Iblit rjalk.i C] mul It . 11&im#IlllIkME- !1IlllIlllIlllIlllIlll. Ill~Il~G - imill==- - - I. t i T 1,~m=mturet=~== W I to- 1: *40 [J]Jm~~IT - R il H : i' 53 8\U dg i I 530 W HALLAM il 1-- n. 2 = 1 1 0 W -A:m VICTORIAN RENOVATION 2 3 530 W HALLAM STREET ASPEN, cO ..' WW,rw Irrn/ayrnondArchitects coin EXISTING ELEVATIONS . .1 97{)Â·925-2252 ernall kirn@kral.us C!(15-400R~A<L~k SNUSIXE 1SV3 I 0~0 .,IF%W Il~*2 9 0 0 80 C '1 IL - ]F--11Ogl 0 0 E- X I .INC>0..dEâ€¢U I 61.- 2 725ilii////7 '1' r ILLY â‚¬ -11-1~ â‚¬ ri" 1 tilt-----1.17 0 0 91 IF ~1 17~ ~~r~ ~,~LEU .UÂ·,L " L '7 7 0 00 : -O - WPOF & 8 0 -b 6 et 1 A en mn n dll? U SETBACK.INe & I. . / 0% Ae <b- -4> e 7 f M ~ ~ E 9 e ->4 e 7 ' 9 4 1 e III EMP Ok46[22'--_-4 e Ifl [=-3 1/ 1 530 W HALLAM VICTORIAN RENOVATION 53(}WIIALLAMblttl I I 2 ASPEN. CO PROPOSED FLOOR PLANS- VIC Â®481!4 K 1 29.'Di. 3/A3 U3/601 ~ze -MON / DRI- /1 1 y M 9 8 MS T 111 1 Di i iii 60 .1 irr . ..P e 0 It-- 0 0 4 MI : e e 1 0 1 -4 T= ILL 8 0 0 .Fi 0 5 lu 59%121 1 . 1 - 92 1 232i &2 2.t:4 4.,89Â¥ 1 : 9*1 9 it 'LE 124 .6 4 9 Â¤ 530 W HALLAM ic=.r m . UNI------Zti 2- m fillill VICTORIAN RENOVATION W WHALLAM ST REL I ASPEN. CO Â®~M . r. illiqliaij . i SOUTH AND WEST EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS - VIC :!:1,~I,i~i DIA NOilVA313 193.7 = 1 11 -i 1IHI Mi I n e e 11 24 1 Â·Â· rp 4 D, h 1 +Z 4 U ':; g F 16 /O - le" 4 4 411 h Â© e 11 0 L e 8 1 8 2-EEEEEEIEJ~*13*> 91% 14 1~ :1 9. 0 : 0 1 0 . I -, 530 W HALLAM V.~" li:i VICTORIAN RENOVATION uilili~:i ' I . "rf 530 W HALLAM t>TREEl = Â®fFic 2 t ' ASPEN, CO 94,11â€ž;0 . 1- -- dÂ¥â€¢11111#Ii K i NORTH AND EAST EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS - VIC DIA NOI1VT,3-13 1SV3 NO11\-A313 Hluo .. U â‚¬ 00 1 1=* *- 1 .1 -7 J u 1 F=tz ~ -2/-~1 1 1 J 1. I - 823â€¢47< = ",4 1. .+I~... 1- 11 E 11 le . e-#*.I- 2- 2262- |1 1__1 00 1 971 , 1 11, Â£22.2 \ 1: =- --4 ... 1 1, râ€žIM...1 7-r -. tWitl-L 1/111â€¢111 Â·Â· - -24Â»-2 U 1 1 1 11 1 1 , IiI 11 1 11,1 , 1 1 1 -- ~J IN I I 1 -Il ,-4.- ~irÂ©Tw 1. 1 f:=L LL=:1 - i " 1 1 1, 1 -1 1 L.-1 1 56,Qf ; 2398#ft | 11 f M 15 I.: ! 1 1 1 - ' - fILI~~~'225 s~~94'. 1 .'~" 1 Ly-1.7 ' 1 4 - 21[9~ 1 / i --Iâ€¢ -CE.-2../ '41Â©*Â¢4 IIi I :lili Ii'<12#4)94 4 ~27| : L.Ilj Jk,143 8 ft e ./ ~~~- 7,845.qft 4 - 0 , tknit-X Irlt AL o , DATE 1#E MAIN LE /3 . Fl:-- 2 29. UPPER LEVEL FAR- PRO-'uSED .150 'W 1,~Â·CS-1,~1]â€¢4 LOWER LEVEL FAR- PROF'"- VICTORIAN CALCULATIONS 0~ER -EvE GROSS 1 9 12 SF h 5 69"Â· 101 SF MA.uGEL *SSe (54â€¢Â·835) , 22. IF uPPER.5 /EL GROSS 62:eF INTERIOR FAR 1/5/6/ ./1/LIVEL CESKIÂ· .11=. FRIÂ·NTFOR/l 43%,bEMPT) UPPER LEli- 2./.8 1 10 'F (Ex//PL 6/RASE 55/ 9F 6315 EXElf'TION; 120 SF Al.1 -0-LL PRO..BED FAR 1.5/1/0Â· . 13/ SF NOIiVAON 3B NVIHOLDIA INV-11VH AA OES 03 'N 3dSM 1 -13HLS 1Â·,IlllVH M 01]9 NVIZIO.1.DIA 0390dOMd - SNOI1Vln01Â¥0 MV=I .. -r: ... -rill'~~ .-1. - 1 j,1 - 11 1223~ e 1. - -94/2,4111.1/~--;'# ...rm,m=,2...= 1.5~22 k:-././*--:'-: 5TH AVE VIER +2//O I -i- Z - O 54 : $ 1 ii-1 -9-2~7- 22 3.-: 1 : 2 4 - - ,-: -- & un , 4 1 ~rr,;""'Iii. DATE l ISSLE - - | HFC E SBUr - i; -- -B--1 jilililil."A 1 v:R.Ed-~ 7.20\ /A._uny 3 5 0 1-0 11KEâ‚¬ ./ GORNER. OF 5-H 4 HALLAMÂ· . Â· -cÂ· AV 9.2 IA Cle SMIV-19 9/N 'NVIMOJOIA 03SIA3hl e U - r FL Dll F jit :'=14-- R-12 e 1----710 19 Uft - I /11: ' - E 0 0 53 li = P.-----1 N 2 4-- 1 - e e *=41 0 0 . 11 1 lili 'M -~ 1ZZ- 1 0 *L " i D o n o 4 C 4 2 _i EizE = E A z 1 '. Ir>Â£=..1 Annn 0Â©4 : ~ rt li~ I m I} I 11 ~ 111 1. L=---. 8 /1 M' P-- --c.J . 1.9 1 ] | S..3/'ILINE 1 \ T n .1 1 0 J . P.OPERTILINE 1 -'1 n " 1 0 e U -147 - Ebal; ' 11 8 211 It 1 =6-=61 0 530 W HALLAM - **FUM# Illlllli Illlllll I~~~~~ ~ ~ ~~ ~~~~~~ VICTORIAN RENOVATION " 3 "4*' ' 530 W HALLAM STREET IÂ¢*ii 8.. 6- 1- 1 ASPEN, CO 83FAm K 4 PROPOSED FLOOR P_AN - MODERN ,-:,i." .., C 310/. I 012)S NÂ¥ld 13A31 83ddn N'fl 3 13 A3 1 WINN Nvld 13A31 5536/ 01 4- WM-22â€¢L/04. ST'~,18 Ib REMAIN. F.OSS.CE n 3'S.| 3'Â¥C 81 1 1 0 0 e G 112 e e 8 8 4\ m-J 0 0 11 1 O CD - Iliji e e lit _ . 10 1 11 L e e e . e U 2 530 W HALLAM { i: Bii: I ____-_-- A F j VICTORIAN RENOVATION 4 â€¢: m UL- 1 ... .. !% 530 WHALLAMSTREET 21 1 1 lili[- 1/ 1-1~ k, i.: ASPEN, CO m:!i A- - *hh, , KI SOUTH AND WEST ELEVATION -MOD PNHU Â·Â· DIA NOUV,4313 HlnOS 00/7 NO11.VA313 193AA 0310/Me'S =11.2 0 0 1111111111111111~~>- 0 0 -11 Â® U - 0 0 e L / 0 0 e â€¢a~ CD 0 0 , yW 530 W HALLAM 477' jf: VICTORIAN RENOVATION 62 , ., 1| g ~ ~ 530 W HALLAM STREET @NE A- W -' ' ASPEN. CO NORTH AND EAST ELEVATION - MOD 7,"~~' ; NOILVAB 13 H MON 00 * Â¤31ONSVI .= L , i./. . 4, C=1 -==- 1 . ~- 11 28 54 ft ...7. Ill . 1 - 2111Â£<ft -/.13 Il ~ 1 1 -1.- 7-1 1 lili 189 1 19.qft REQe /1--M i ~ -- __ __..#11 - - r=7-71-7-n- m . tv ]0 'W \ 1 1....11,1 . 4 k 1,9 ]Befili-f ,.Â·gi .1 I rH+A++H Fin 1 12-1 i â‚¬222 - Llt*W.W. I ~~ '3 1 : ~- - ~ -1 i -MT,inâ„¢ Â·Â· ; ll Iiiâ€žâ€ž, 1 +1 ilin ZL~ I ~ 1~ ----U-1-1-LULU $ L-- = - U-' -- T n-in de I . 8 2Uch' ' 1 7 5 sqft Ibla al' i 6 / 14, 4e ~ L L L .11 V .U 1 0.1 --1- 1 1.46 2 14 f 6 IBI ~' ~ : ; t~]El f l -1 2-= IpÂ£a [Â·1 .-5 - :lili 1. - m @ 2 - ---37- ... 1,1, mif ~LU~ f go -A. [~V:.am.4. i l. CD 0 I 4 0 OVVER LEVEL FAR- PROPOSED MAIN LE v E R LEVEL FARÂ·Â· 1 MODERN CALCULATIONS .DAE'K LE VEL :R,0Â£6 2111 le (~ 5J ?6) - I./SF M.14 LE VEL 'ROSS 1 318 IF uPPER k. /E- GROSS 11/g INTERIOR I< ~2TDS= *IN LEVEu SECK' FRON'/0/0.4 Â·JeSF(ExeMPT) ILI ./9.-.4 % g E./.*97/ u-ER -EVE- 3...3 1 62 'F'ExEMIT) ........... '-3/5 EXEMPnON) 2226F TOTAL -O POSED FAR O a 84 9 Â· f L /f f 54" 4 1 74 --U Jht: : -21 I/'I1*32 2 ........LJL/tur '. 1 1 1 IllilgjljSjINIQ ~f.4. 11-[r 1,1. + 41< h 2 1 L. .1 1 - 1 , I l. 1 0 6,/...A.:. ,&6~ 1., & I Q '11441-~ , If.- 1 42.AP-: 4 h - - 530 W HAL LAM VICTORIAN RENOVATION 'doWMAMAMSTIA, I J ' 0. " 3 i ASPEN. co STREETSCAPE 23Â£ W iIi 3 ~~Ell 31Â¥0 0 0 AFFIDAVIT OF PUBLIC NOTICE REQUIRED BY SECTION 26.304.060 (E), ASPEN LAND USE CODE ADDRESS OF PROPERTY: 530 W. H46-nA 9 , Aspen, CO SCHEDULED PUBLIC HEARING DATE: Akwar) A-p-Al ts @ 5: oofvrl , 2015. STATE OF COLORADO ) ) SS. County of Pitkin ) 1, Av~24' i Â©Cerâ‚¬-A-~ (name, please print) being or representing an Applicant to the City of Aspen, Colorado, hereby personally certify that I have complied with the public notice requirements of Section 26.304.060 (E) of the Aspen Land Use Code in the following manner: / Publication of notice: By the publication in the legal notice section of an official paper or a paper of general circulation in the City of Aspen at least fifteen (15) days prior to the public hearing. A copy of the publication is attached hereto. Posting of notice: By posting of notice, which form was obtained from the Community Development Department, which was made of suitable, waterproof materials, which was not less than twenty-two (22) inches wide and twenty-six (26) inches high, and which was composed of letters not less than one inch in height. Said notice was posted at least fifteen (15) days prior to the public hearing on the day of , 20 , to and including the date and time of the public hearing. A photograph of the posted notice (sign) is attached hereto. Mailing of notice. By the mailing of a notice obtained from the Community Development Department, which contains the information described in Section 26.304.060(E)(2) of the Aspen Land Use Code. At least fifteen (15) days prior to the public hearing, notice was hand delivered or mailed by first class postage prepaid U.S. mail to all owners of property within three hundred (300) feet of the property subject to the development application. The names and addresses of property owners shall be those on the current tax records of Pitkin County as they appeared no more than sixty (60) days prior to the date of the public hearing. A copy of the owners and governmental agencies so noticed is attached hereto. Neighborhood Outreach: Applicant attests that neighborhood outreach, summarized and attached, was conducted prior to the first public hearing as required in Section 26.304.035, Neighborhood Outreach. A coPy Of tile neighborhood outreach summary, including the method of public notification and a copy of any documentation that was presented to the public is attached hereto. (continued on next page) .. Mineral Estate Owner Notice. By the certified mailing of notice, return receipt requested, to affected mineral estate owners by at least thirty (30) days prior to the date scheduled for the initial public hearing on the application of development. The names and addresses of mineral estate owners shall be those on the current tax records of Pitkin County. At a minimum, Subdivisions, SPAs or PUDs that create more than one lot, new Planned Unit Developments, and new Specially Planned Areas, are subject to this notice requirement. Rezoning or text amendment. Whenever the official zoning district map is in any way to be changed or amended incidental to or as part o f a general revision o f this Title, or whenever the text of this Title is to be amended, whether such revision be made by repeal of this Title and enactment of a new land use regulation, or otherwise, the requirement of an accurate survey map or other sufficient legal description of, and the notice to and listing of names and addresses of owners of real property in the area of the proposed change shall be waived. However, the proposed zoning map shall be available for public inspection in the planning agency during all business hours for fifteen (15) days prior to the public hearing on such amendments. Signature The foregoing "Affidavit ofNotice" was acknowledged before me this 26 day of HMt , 20LE, by .4-112+6-, Sc=Â·Â·Â·-0-~-~ PUBLIC NOTICE RE:530 W. HALLAM STREET- HISTORIC LANDMARK LOT SPUT NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that a public hearing WITNESS MY HAND AND OFFICIAL SEAL will be held on Monday, April 13, 2015, at a meet- ing to begin at 5:00 p.m. before the Aspen City Council, Council Chambers, City Hall, 130 S. Gale- na St., Aspen to consider an application submitted by 530 Hallam LLC, 0133 Prospector Lane, Ste My commission expires: 10 ~ 30 ~ a 41028, Aspen, CO 81611, affecting the property at 530 W. Hallam, Lots K, L and M, Block 28, City and Townsite of Aspen, Colorado, Parcel , ID#2735-124-25-004. The applicant is requesting approval to subdivide the lot for the construction of '3212,71 n , e L . D ki , 1-0 <i a new home. For further information, contact Amy Simon at the City of Aspen Community Develop- Notary Public ment Department, 130 S. Galena St., Aspen, CO, (970) 429-2758, amy.simon @cityofaspen.com. s/ Steven Skadron, Mayor BONNIE L. SMILES Aspen City Council ri83322* 22228p*~:*:*2:31.â€¢+Wi - Published in the Aspen Tirnes on March 26,2015. (11050592) STATE OF COLOR/l,i,(. NOTARY PUBLK -- Le=COM~EXPIRES 09102(CR 30 ..01 -1 __ATTACHMENTS AS APPLICABLE: m NOTARY ID 20056038 2,4,i â€¢ COPY OF THE PUBLICATION 228-209*emp. Â·:, glÂ·Â·r â€¢ PHOTOGRAPH OF THE POSTED NOTICE (SIGN) â€¢ LIST OF THE OWNERS AND GOVERNMENTAL AGENCIES NOTICED BY MAIL â€¢ APPLICANT CERTIFICATION OF MINERAL ESTAE OWNERS NOTICE AS REQUIRED BY C.R.S. Â§24-65.5-103.3 .. MEMORANDUM TO: Mayor Skadron and City Council THRU: Chris Bendon, Community Development Director FROM: Amy Simon, Historic Preservation Officer RE: First Reading of Ordinance #10, Series of 2015- 530 W. Hallam Historic Landmark Lot Split DATE: March 9, 2015 SUMMARY: 530 W. Hallam is a Victorian era home with 1970s and 1980s additions to the east and rear. The applicant proposes to demolish the non-historic additions, move the house front and west, towards the corner, and add on. The lot is to be subdivided so that the open yard on the east side of the Victorian can be developed with a new home. The allowed floor area for the project is the same as would be permitted for a duplex or two detached houses on the property with no subdivision involved. *.U 3.-91 *..4 =Et..../- ...%4 . â€¢â€¢ -14 - Y tsls.e, .. .. 6 94.1 . 4, -1....1 ... + Top left: The house in approximately the .' 4. 1 . 1950s. . 3' j . .r 0 -: # Top right: The house in 1980, with a one P fltÂ· Â·.Â· ' t. lip + , ; story addition that altered the original design. I â„¢' 1 , Â·Â·i Left: The site is now inundated with trees . h. that were planted in the right of way. The â€¢ t.. City Forester has reviewed the property and 'r .. K . has indicated that two trees should be removed because of declining health and :.7----,v.--Â·.7...Â£25*0~~~1~,~<~~~ overcrowding. ,-VÂ·~4-&.8#<Vf~- .. APPLICANT: 530 Hallam, LLC, represented by Kim Raymond Architects. PARCEL ID: 2735-124-25-004. ADDRESS: 530 W. Hallam, Lots K, L, and M, Block 28, City and Townsite of Aspen, Colorado. ZONING: R-6. HISTORIC LANDMARK LOT SPLIT The split of a lot that is a designated Historic Landmark for the purpose of creating one additional development parcel shall be approved, approved with conditions, or denied by the City Council, pursuant to Section 26.480.030 - Procedures for Review, after a recommendation is provided by the Historic Preservation Commission pursuant to Section 26.415.110(A) Historic Landmark Lot Split, and according to the following standards: 1. The request complies with the requirements of Section 26.480.040, General Subdivision Review Standards. A. Guaranteed Access to a Public Way. All subdivided lots must have perpetual unobstructed legal vehicular access to a public way. A proposed subdivision shall not eliminate or obstruct legal vehicular access from a public way to an adjacent property. All streets in a Subdivision retained under private ownership shall be dedicated to public use to ensure adequate public and emergency access. Security/privacy gates across access points and driveways are prohibited. B. Alignment with Original Townsite Plat. The proposed lot lines shall approximate, to the extent practical, the platting of the Original Aspen Townsite, and additions thereto, as applicable to the subject land. Minor deviations from the original platting lines to accommodate significant features of the site may be approved. C. Zoning Conformance. All new lots shall conform to the requirements of the zone district in which the property is situated, including variations and variances approved pursuant to this Title. A single lot shall not be located in more than one zone district unless unique circumstances dictate. A rezoning application may be considered concurrently with subdivision review. D. Existing Structures, Uses, and Non-Conformities. A subdivision shall not create or increase the non-conformity of a use, structure or parcel. A rezoning application or other mechanism to correct the non-conforming nature of a use, structure, or parcel may be considered concurrently. 530 W. Hallam Page 2 of 4 .. In the case where an existing structure or use occupies a site eligible for subdivision. the structure need not be demolished and the use need not be discontinued prior to application for subdivision. If approval of a subdivision creates a non-conforming structure or use, including a structure spanning a parcel boundary, such structure or use may continue until recordation of the subdivision plat. Alternatively, the City may accept certain assurance that the non-conformities will be remedied after recordation of the subdivision plat. Such assurances shall be reflected in a development agreement or other legal mechanism acceptable to the City Attorney and may be time-bound or secured with a financial surety. M KN ..1 Staff Response: The application, to split the lot into one 4,150 1 -I-J square foot lot, containing a relocated Victorian home, and one ~ A ~ C. M 4,850 square foot lot, containing a new home, meets the criteria ' ~ above. According to the 1904 Sanborn Fire Insurance map at , right, there were two houses on the subject property in the ~ ~ Victorian era. : 8 J 2. The fathering parcel is listed in the Inventory of I ~ 42 0 Historic Sites and Structures. 1 7.4 Staff Response: The parcel is listed on the Inventory of 11 Historic Sites and Structures. 4 224 332247 32 52 530 3 3. No more than two lots are created by the Historic Landmark Lot Split. No more than one historic landmark lot split shall occur on any one fathering parcel. Staff Response: Two lots are created. 4. In residential zone districts, the allowable Floor Area for each new residential lot shall be established by allocating the total allowable Floor Area of the fathering parcel to each of the new lots such that no overall increase in Floor Area is achieved and no individual lot allows a Floor Area in excess of that allowed a similarly-sized lot in the same zone district. An equal distribution is not required. The allowable Floor Area for each new lot shall be noted on the Historic Lot Split Plat. Any Floor Area bonus already granted by the Historic Preservation Commission shall be allocated to each individual parcel and shall also be noted on the plat as a square footage bonus. If the properties remain eligible for a Floor Area bonus from the Historic Preservation Commission, the plat and subdivision agreement shall specify the manner in which this potential bonus shall be allocated to the two properties if received. In non-residential zones districts, the Floor Area shall be calculated according to the limitations of the zone district applied to each new lot as permitted for the use. 530 W. Hallam Page 3 of 4 i .. The total Floor Area shall not be stated on the plat because the floor area will be determined by the use established on each parcel. Staff Response: The allowable floor area on the fathering (existing) parcel is 4,080 square feet. The applicant proposes to split that, plus a 500 square foot tloor area bonus granted by HPC, approximately 45% to the Victorian home and 55% to the new home. The floor area for the project is only about 700 square feet more than exists in the single family home on the site today. 5. The Historic Lot Split Plat shall be reviewed and recorded in the o ffice of the Pitkin County Clerk and Recorder, pursuant to Chapter 26.490 - Approval Documents. No subdivision agreement need be prepared or entered into between the applicant and the City unless the Community Development Director determines such an agreement is necessary. Staff Response: The plat will be filed subsequent to historic landmark lot split approval by City Council. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff and LIPC recommend Council support the proposed Historic Landmark Lot Split. RECOMMENDED MOTION: "1 move to read Ordinance #10, Series of 2015." CITY MANAGER COMMENTS: EXHIBITS: Ordinance #10, Series of 2015 Exhibit A: Application 530 W. Hallam Page 4 0 f 4 .. ORDINANCE #10 (Series of 2015) AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ASPEN, COLORADO APPROVING A HISTORIC LANDMARK LOT SPLIT FOR THE PROPERTY LOCATED AT 530 W. HALLAM, LOTS K, L, AND M, BLOCK 28, CITY AND TOWNSITE OF ASPEN, COLORADO PARCEL ID #: 2735-124-25-004 WHEREAS, the applicant, 530 Hallam, LLC, represented by Kim Raymond Architects, has requested a Historic Landmark Lot Split for the property located at 530 W. Hallam, Lots K, L, and M, Block 28, City and Townsite ofAspen, Colorado; and WHEREAS, for City Council approval of a Historic Landmark Lot Split, the application shall meet the requirements of Municipal Code Section 26.480.060.B regarding Minor Subdivision; and WHEREAS, at their regular meeting on February 11, 2015, the Ilistoric Preservation Commission considered the application, found the application was consistent with the review standards, and recommended City Council approval, with conditions, by a vote of 4 to 0; and WHEREAS, Amy Simon, Historic Preservation Officer, in her staff report to City Council, performed an analysis of the application, found that the review standards for Historic Landmark Lot Split are met, and recommended approval; and WHEREAS, the City Council finds that the proposal meets or exceeds all applicable development standards and that the approval of the development proposal is consistent with the goals and elements o f the Aspen Area Community Plan; and, WHEREAS, the City Council finds that this Ordinance furthers and is necessary for the promotion of public health, safety, and welfare. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ASPEN, COLORADO, THAT: Section 1: Historic Landmark Lot Split Pursuant to the findings set forth in Section 1, above, the City Council does hereby grant a Historic Landmark Lot Split for 530 W. Hallam, Lots K, L, and M, Block 28, City and Townsite o f Aspen, Colorado with the following conditions: 1. The Historic Lot Split Plat shall be reviewed and recorded in the office of the Pitkin County Clerk and Recorder, pursuant to Chapter 26.490 - Approval Documents. No subdivision agreement need be prepared or entered into between the applicant and the City. The Plat shall: 530 W. Hallam Ordinance #10, Series of 2015 Page 1 of 3 .. a. Contain a plat note stating that no further subdivision may be granted for these lots nor will additional units be built without receipt of applicable approvals pursuant to the provisions of the Land Use Code in effect at the time of application; b. Contain a plat note stating that all new development on the lots will conform to the dimensional requirements of the zone district, except for any approved variances: and c. Be labeled to indicate that the maximum floor area allowed on Lot 1,a 4,150 square foot lot containing the Victorian home. is 2,138 square feet and on Lot 2, a 4,850 square foot lot containing new home, is 2,442 square feet. Section 2: Severability If any section, subsection, sentence, clause, phrase or portion of this ordinance is for any reason held invalid or unconstitutional in a court of competent jurisdiction, such portion shall be deemed a separate, distinct and independent provision and shall not affect the validity of the remaining portions thereof. Section 3: Existing Litigation This ordinance shall not have any effect on existing litigation and shall not operate as an abatement of any action or proceeding now pending under or by virtue of the ordinances amended as herein provided, and the same shall be construed and concluded under such prior ordinances. Section 4: Vested Rights The Land Use entitlements granted herein shall be vested for a period of three (3) years from the date of issuance of a development order. However, any failure to abide by any o f the terms and conditions attendant to this approval shall result in the forfeiture of said vested property rights. Unless otherwise exempted or extended, failure to properly record all plats and agreements required to be recorded, as specified herein, within 180 days of the effective date of the development order shall also result in the forfeiture of said vested property rights and shall render the development order void within the meaning of Section 26.104.050 (Void permits). Zoning that is not part of the approved site-specific development plan shall not result in the creation of a vested property right. No later than fourteen (14) days following final approval o f all requisite reviews necessary to obtain a development order as set forth in this Ordinance, including Final Major Development by the HPC, the City Clerk shall cause to be published in a newspaper of general circulation within the jurisdictional boundaries of the City of Aspen, a notice advising the general public of the approval of a site specific development plan and creation of a vested property right pursuant to this Title. Such notice shall be substantially in the following form: Notice is hereby given to the general public of the approval of a site specific development plan, and the creation of a vested property right, valid for a period of three (3) years, pursuant to the Land Use Code of the City of Aspen and Title 24, Article 68, Colorado Revised Statutes, pertaining to the following described property: 530 W. Hallam, Lots K, L, and M, Block 28, City and Townsite of Aspen, Colorado. 530 W. Hallam Ordinance #10, Series of 2015 Page 2 of 3 .. Nothing in this approval shall exempt the development order from subsequent reviews and approvals required by this approval of the general rules, regulations and ordinances or the City of Aspen provided that such reviews and approvals are not inconsistent with this approval. 1 he approval granted hereby shall be subject to all rights of referendum and judicial review; the period of time permitted by law for the exercise of such rights shall not begin to run until the date of publication of the notice of final development approval as required under Section 26.304.070(A). The rights of referendum shall be limited as set forth in the Colorado Constitution and the Aspen Home Rule Charter. Section 5: Public Hearing A public hearing on the ordinance shall be held on the 13th day of April, 2015, in the City Council Chambers, Aspen City Hall, Aspen, Colorado, fifteen (15) days prior to which hearing a public notice o f the same was published in a newspaper of general circulation within the City of Aspen. INTRODUCED, READ AND ORDERED PUBLISHED as provided by law, by the City Council of the City of Aspen on the 9th day of March, 2015. Steven Skadron, Mayor ATTEST: Linda Manning, City Clerk FINALLY, adopted, passed and approved this day of , 2015. Steven Skadron, Mayor ATTEST: Kathryn Koch, City Clerk APPROVED AS TO FORM: James R. True, City Attorney 530 W. Hallam Ordinance #10, Series of 2015 Page 3 of 3 .. 0650 Â· 2014 .ki\?g ATTACHMENT 2 -LAND USE APPLICATION PROJECr: Name: 536 lrIALLAwn c LL(L - Â«-AbvA'EM,/7 /41~ 59(.1Â« 0/ Locatioii: 53(30 14,16(-Awl Aâ‚¬*44 nfiAj 145 1 :piE,ncE (Indicate street address, lot & bfock nutpber, legal description where appropriate) Parcel ID # (REQUIRED) 2-7.39 - /674Â· 25-064 APPLICANT: Name: 5-030 14ALCAL-/1, l-Le. 14412.6 fÂ¥.1 fPL,4 r, 9/ 0'16 7- Address: 01 33 71266-F~ECTE'~2 4/tkN %,A-s-TE Y) â‚¬749 4 Phone #: 910- 11.Ao REPRESENTATIVE: Name: j,<1 Fn 12-Â»ly>2.rint) Aizck-\14â‚¬C-FS; )p-.0 Address: (,133 clFAÂ«Â¢63Â«16- Su!11Â£- 416â‚¬9 1 43*En -phone #: 4 2â‚¬ - 7.26 2 TYPE OF APPLICATION: (please check all that apply): 0 GMQS Exemption El Conceptual PUD U Temporary Use U GMQS Allotment Â£ Final PUD (& PUD Amendment) [3 Text/Map Amendment E Special Review U Subdivision U Conceptual SPA D ESA- 8040 Greenline, Stream El Subdivision Exemption (includes E| Final SPA (& SPA Maigin, Hallam Lake Bluff, condoininiumization) Amendment) Mountain View Plane O Commercial Design Review [@' Lot Splittft, 5-ropt 6 El Small Lodge Conversion/ Expansion Ef Residential Design Variance El Lot Line Adjustment W Other: RY>O ~ Conditional Use EXISTING CONDITIONS: (description of existing buildings, uses, previous approvals, etc.) 41,04 6Â£ FA.PILLy 14-1572Â¥~c 1*St ry#' AL ki/ Fi/LI,4,7 1/jiLLS *19,1020)* 5 ed A LA vt,0,04Â« 7494(4 Y AN. 0-1- 19 71 PROPOSAL: (description ofproposed buildings, uses, modifications, etc.) UnoVAÂ·'701Â· 4(51AF) 6 5-1*ucrrw 12Â£.j 92-pno KicipeT 41)17,1-/an,t Pl.Â©vit WI'$70,210 Ju.Â»q -,40>91,0,q e REAÂ·KÂ·,~/ l.-01- S>1761-0-f f }01 Â£Â·loâ‚¬}p~.a LE-Â· Filw~LLâ‚¬ 1,-6-Pyl JE- Have you attached the following? FEES DUE: $__ t.Â£14 -- 8 Pre-Application Conference Summary fg Attachment #1, Signed Fee Agreement E-~ Response to Attachment #3, Dimensional Requirements Form C I Response to Attachment #4, Submittal Requirements- Including Written Responses to Review Standards 1~_f 3-D Model for large project All plans that are larger than 8.5" X 11"must be folded. A disk with an electric copy of all written text (Microsoft Word Format) must be submitted as part of the application. Large seale projects should include an electronic 3-D model. Your pre-application conference summary wilt indicate ifyou must submit a 3-D model. IMPROVEMENT SURVEY PLAT OF: 530 W. HALLAM STREET SECTION 12, TOWNSHIP 10 SOUTH, RANGE 85 WEST OF THE 6th P.M. LOTS K, L & M, BLOCK 28 CITY & TOWNSITE OF ASPEN , 1 4 - 4 5., 6 L COUNTY OF PITKIN, STATE OF COLORADO SHEET 1 OF 2 r 14~3;1=1 tit 5.15IP-~~ty> c.,tt~Â·,~ Eut f VIC'/Y MAP $(â€¢i. r. = L.1 LOT 2 PROPERTY DESCRIPTION RFC . 477706 RLC. NO 4~7706 wto j LOTS ClAR. A#T) .IC.0 '30.,7 ( RECEPTION NO. 5222371 LOTS K. L & M, BLOCK 28, Cl. AND TOWNSITE OF ASPEN d INNPNO ~Nl~~NO(AP n rlt.UNI>1,0,~u,AnPLAmLOP'/*32 / B[ARS...31-W]39 MMCORNER 40 L 1 brIOUNUNO~MinA-%,DLECAP lou"ho ~i-&11110-ECAP L GU/L Sumâ€¢{1 ~ S 75'0911 ~ 04*, /h SURVEY NOTES FTNO.REMAM' LASnCCAP / /- .\4,17' -=% 4â„¢Â¢TRFFT 5TH STMFFT 1) DATE OF FIELD WORK JULY 14 Â· 15 AND SEPTEM.R 23. 2014 A,PHAU SUR,ACE Ady .. / AtPHAI.,RFArf 2, DATE OF PREPARATION: JULY AND SEPTEMBER. 2014. MGHTOF WAÂ¥ 3) BASIS OF BEARING: A BEARING OF N80'41'42"E BE1WEEN THE SOUTHWEST CORNER "/ APOI~.1,10, ~NO 9 OF BLOCK 28(MONUMENTEDBY A 1 PIPE WITH AN UNMARKEDMETALCAP) AND THE / bl,L. PHANÂ¢1' LO r LO. 10'., ~07....fl .0 toi LO-l .TR (OTS 5OUTHEAST CORNER OF CLARK'S ADDITION SUBDIV,SION (MONUMENTED WITH A NO. 5 / REBARWITH AN ILLEGIBLECAP) 4) BASIS OF 5URVEY (DOCUMENTS PER COUNTY RECORDS) THE HISTORIC LANDMAR. 16 8 /// LOT SPLIT AT 533 W FRANCIS STREET 5UBDIVISION EXEMPTION PLAT RECORDED JANUARY 24. 2003 AS RECEPTION NO. 477706; THE IMPROVEMENT AND TOPOGRAPHIC SURVEY OF LOTS A, B, AND C, SLOCK 28 ORIGINAL ASPEN TOWNSITE DEPOSITED MAY 1, 7S~0941~.4 ./// 2000 AS RECEPTION NO 442863; THE CONDOMINIUM MAP OF CLARK'S ADDITION RECORDED JULY 18, 1980 AS RECEPTION NO. 225432: THE FIRST SUPPLEMENTAL PLAT TO Cl'YOFASPENCONTROL /~OuND{~1GI~1[IrÂ¥,L(XKC~,a, . '6.0 1,-W 270 CO -, THE CONDOMINIUM MAP OF CLARKS ADDITION RECORDED JANUARY 26, 1981 AS MONUMENTNO 20 RECEPTION NO 230437, THE OFFICIAL MAP OF THE CITY OF ASPEN, PREPARED BY G.E. 7â„¢&FRANCIS 1-PIMW~Ul,MA=#g BUCHANAN, DATED DECEMBER 15, 1959; CITY OF ASPEN GPS CONTROL MONUMENTATION MAP PREPARED BY MARCIN ENGINEERING LLC, DATED DECEMBER 2 I,AL,All,-ILIFT I I ~111/1 Â·WAY 2009; VARIOUS DOCUMENTS OF RECORD; AND THE FOUND MONUMENT5, AS SHOWN. A,1.11/1 5(MI:,Ack 5) THI SURVEY DOES NOT CONST'WIE A TITLE SEARCH BY SOPRIS ENGINEERING, LLC TO DETERMINE OWNERSHIP OR EASEMENTS OF RECORD. FOR ALL INFORMATION REGARDING EASEMENTS RIGHT5 OF WAY AND/OA TITLE OF RECORD, SE RELIED UPON ABOVE SAID PLATS DESCRIBED IN NOTE 4 AND THE TITLE COMMITMENT PREPARED BY ,-Â·- rOUNDORIO,hAL rr Y.OCkCOR- PITKIN COUNTY TITLE, INC, CASE NO PCr24123W WITH AN EFFECTIVE DATE OF JULY 10. / l'P. W.IMâ€¢'KEDÂ¥â‚¬-â€¢(.P 2014 1 8,-00 20,1 PROPERTY, SHOWN HEREON CONTOUR INTERVAL IS ONE (1) FOOT. 1 rfill 1 04 1 6) BASIS OF ELEVATION: THE 2009 CITY OF ASPEN MARCIN CONTROL DATUM, WHICH 15 BASED ON AN ELEVATION OF 7720.88' {NAV[ 1988) ON THE NGS STATION -S-159-,THIS PRODUCED A LOCAL SITE BENCHMARK AT THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF THE SU8JECT SURVEYOR'S CERTIFICATE 1, MARK S. BECKLER. HEREBY CERTIFY TO SHAFROTH ASPEN HOUSE LLC A COLORADO LIMITED LIABILITY COMPANY; ASPEN'TAmWO~IrrXND-FmKTNEOUmV'rl'r[ETNE THAT THIS IS AN "iMPROVEMENT SURVEY PLAT" AS DEFINED BY C.R.5.4 38Â·51-102(9Â£ AND GRAPHIC SCALE THAT IT ISA MONUMENTED LAND SURVEY SHOWING THE CURRENT LOCATION OF ALL I . STRUCTURES. WATER COURSES, WATER FEATURES AND/OR BODIES OF WATER, FLOOD ~ PLAIN, VISIBLE ROADS, TRAILS, UTILITIES. FENCES. HEDGES, OR WALLS SITUATED ON THE DESCRIBED PARCEL AND WITHIN FIVE FEET OF ALL BOUNDARIES OF SUCH PARCEL, ANY AND RIGHTS OF WAY OF A PUBLIC OR PRIVATE NATURE THAT ARE VISIBLE. OR APPARENT, CONFLICTING BOUNDARY EVIDENCE OR VISIBLE ENCROACHMENTS, AND.l EASEMENTS OR OF RECORD AND UNDERGROUND UTILITIES DESCRIBED IN PITKIN COUNTY TITLE. INC.'. SOPRIS ENGINEERING-LLC TinE I. RANCE CA5Â£ NO PCT24123W. OR OTHER SOURCES AS SPECIFIED ON THE IMPROVEMENT SURVEY P.T. CIVILCONSULTANTS 502 MAIN STREET, SUITE A3 h oT C E ACrn~Â£)01,; TO COLOUDO LAw a. -ST CE].ate,[1,14, Li(* CARBONDALE. COLORADO 81623 MARK 5. BECKLER LS #28643 (970) 704-0311 SOPRISENG@SOPRISENG.COM IMPROVEMENT SURVEY PLAT OF: 530 W. HALLAM STREET SECTION 12, TOWNSHIP 10 SOUTH, RANGE 85 WEST OF THE 6th P.M. LOTS K, L & M, BLOCK 28 CITY & TOWNSITE OF ASPEN COUNTY OF PITKIN, STATE OF COLORADO SHEET 2 OF 2 LOT 1 LOT 2 LOT D REC. NO. 477706 REC NO. 477706 . .-0~~END I 44 6 , 46 . BLOO< 28 ALL'tY , Â·La ' 4 , 21.b?' RIGHT-OF-WAY , .' CATVPEDESTAL 1 A </ I I GRAVE[ SURF~(fE . TELEPHONE PEDESTAL *b SFTâ€ž0 5 RFnAR. PLASTICCAP . ELECTRICIETER m , WIT/1/WORIFIL GASME-TER 979Â¤09'11" F 9 ar 4 UÂ» L' ./3 1410 -0-0- WOODEN FENCE t.3 DECIOUOUSTREE CON 'Mfi~*P 1 CONIFEROUS TREE SINGLE FAM LY MULTI LEVEL ~, WOOD M AME MOUSE ---(4 1 E~EOFVEGETATION j |i 73 U.i-5.Fol 4%17. _...2#3 0 Â° 0 -/-9 8 9 r //1 - -1 % 1 D V"4 -. .......T 'Je 2,11~ -Aleluli . LOT N 'AgMFi,T OR (MwI~PAf f 6 1 1 \ 23 7' CON[1 ER.0.5 23 1-4 A 6, 55 - 311"CONIF[RUOUS gsa - B 01 c k 1 r.,. W r /'0 48./. ' I. 11 15 ~ 0 i \42 290 1 i . r ryÂ·~\n -19' 4 2 243"CONIFERUOUS .PER Â«4< i 443'Ce!11'RUOUS Y 4 LOT K \ iâ‚¬f-ttzz@&1~i~ ' X.AA' 7 \-,2>, I '1 1.-V \ 30 00 I 1202'CON"HUOUSÂ« T 7/1 4 r rk Ly ~OU~OOK,GINALCITY BLOÂ«CORNER L._/ i"pip'w/UNMARKED./.CAP PROJECT BENCHMARK EkEVAT~ON.79:} 09 HALLAM STREET 74.38' RIGHT-OF-WAY GRAPHISCALE -N,2 ASPHALTSURFACE lili..1 SOPRIS ENGINEERING-LLC 1.h= 10. CIVILLONSULTANTS 502 MAIN STREET, SUITE A3 Acc,/ING To c{) cR*,0 LAw~Ou 1,1.5. COMMBNCE ,~ ~IGAL nt'r U.7./2,&*/211 CARBONDALE, COLORADO 81623 (970) 704-0311 SOPRISENG@SOPRISENG.COM 5TH ST ~ 76.24' RIGHT-OEWAY ASPHALTSURFACE 14.8' n 6 CON CRETÂ®RFACE (TYP.) -~ 1 - -- L HE |||l| | | -'ll| I.6 a . - WINDOW WELL. TiÂ» I IIi liE f ]E li fifity ~ 2.4' - 0 1 *. 1. IQC -31 21 ~ J HI !~20 1.4 ' 1%41/ 1~582 saft ~-~ 1 11 1 1 - SEALED OFF APPARENT [-4 2,2 4 4 saft 1 ~ BASEMENT OR CRAWLSPACE PECFICAT~6 ~N=*=4.20 171*ommg=rt= ~p,mGIT al /1 =711='<Â°-2,; ACCESS/COAL CHUTE RAW TIE RFTAINING WAH / min:VÂ°=====402 ' clk--' I r-r 1 , r cr-T... - . 6, 1 W -!. - .... - 1 ..3 eclf 1 -Â¥-r- , 11= ha to r- le & 41 ft i [dl=-Â·TE 1 J - - Z 8 1 9 I 1 < LU It ~~ E I ~138 Sq tt 2 z 3 â€¢ B/4 , 1.-0' I <C 0 , 9 9 22 1.0 0 7 111111111 29.0 UPPER LEVEL DEMO 62 ** = W 0 MAIN LEVEL DEMO SCALE 3,1.= 11 0- e A DATE ISSUE 8 4 SCH'WIC LOPAER LEVEL NOT INCLUDED IN CALCULAT]ONS < 5 3'- 6 MAIN LEVEL EXISTING (22 94.148+138+86 +20).2626 SF DEMO 752,1134â€¢138- 16745/ UPPER LEVEL EXISTINe (1532 + 62)1644 SF DEMO 685+172-145-ISF TOTAL EXISTING EXISTING 433O5F DEMO 31 31SF l~l j lf:) 1 11!ll !11 k Scale AS NOTED 2,43 SF/38 -le -72% DEMO E-c k t=â€¢: I' .li m -1')7 , i'~: 1111~1~ ~| - - 7 1 ~oT wN'r o,r i. i, i . I. i,ils n....i: i./ 1 .1 ?11 1 111 1111 i 1J A 1.4 1 LOWER LEVEL DEMO SCA[. m ./ , I..."'n 1 rl T L h 00 'NadSV 133hI1S \IÂ¥11Â¥H M 0â‚¬9 60190 0~30 i 3Â» 1-+ .11[M.,11.:IM - - , m . 4.-2 2.- - AVES,Vill".I~fldid"fi ' I Mull'h : - - 2,-- uÂ· -J < I--i + --i~ -- 7 , - - --:En- _.â€¢r--*-GAINÂ»-7-â€ž-.. â€ž- -.Il -'- 4 -: - -26=t:FVÂ·u.~c= . --2 ie,rit z.Â»- 3 1 0. . . 0. - T -- - - 11. le, Im' 1 11.**,5 +-- - - - -6 ' F '0 40--.** . _ ... . LI- 71=6= 4*. ;I Â»m--- -- . 1 r =~ .1 -E= .. - - II# ,). j iii=. -.- - - - 1 1=r -- H./M...... MA, AU- . .. l. 0 . . D 46 Rf - - 1 ....F,0 . lih 2 , lili 1 E# - ... A . D . ....it 51 1 10 FIFTH STREET r Â»84: 0. 4 .. / m . il , 1- L /dr J ' f.f- i. 1 1[ L 1 / 1 PeO~OSFED Â·Â·Eâ€¢N 1 1 ......â„¢ lINE 3--i I I.-1 I ' 333*4 1 D. 1 444, 1 . j 6-4-4.-1 L 3.-5.- i â‚¬11 1 , . 1,11 (1 1 f 601-/ -1 -7 --- O-Finv--1 -----u~~ r 4 r ....CIT-#142 â‚¬ m le r.O .@t 530 W HALL-AM 3 Z rr VICTORIAN RENOVATION :1m A~ N A . E ASPEN, CO 530 W HALLAM STREET b Ut: A -- W,;2}E. wv~.Kirn,RaymondArchitects.com SITE PLAN - PROPOSED 40*thu 970-925-2252 email kim@krai.us 90.~T NÂ¥ld 31IS 211 91(49/ ALLEY LOT SIZE: q,000 SF 133119 INÂ¥11Â¥H 3Ni-16.2.1.0/ mi~OvellÂ®NUG a~~1 eN '1,0 *h NIÂ¥,4 2~Ilâ‚¬h LGIX LOT BIZE: 4,000 SF D JM, â€¢ge a . ..:'59â€žZi:ful,# TO~e.Â·rAN~PEMO.04(ED : c E.0 T -- .0. rM:â€ž.,C>0211'.01. T T 02/.*Wl-O.8-Al ....... . 1 4 ! Em 1. 1 4---ETERTInmmunnfL_.--~ N EX!9'â„¢.MASCAANpsÂ£15.1~ 4=1 111'11 11%Â¢"*&11 11'11'11 r-[---r' ~~779~E;rmini*611111111|111111|111 N ExeT,Ncs)â€¢LINC>DAT,KMTMAI' 4.uqui*11--Ill 1111111 Iml~fff(4~1 11 EN*1118dn*EENÂ» .OFFIT ....MAIN -2 EX!671\S=*SCI~ ~ND >N U.1-1111111111IA, -- MM Ed EX,3TINe AOOD SID Ne 2 6 AND â„¢IM -0 REMAIN Eli P =B I)(>n ./ig-2 EXSTINeINOODSâ‚¬MN6â€¢-Nilx42804 -3-- T,MT#1/ ' i TRIMTOREMAIN I . Câ‚¬SKGâ€¢15 mELAS /*W-/S *1,0 11- *IN) 6. THEal DRA~,40& % PECIFICA-IONS *RE Foâ€¢tiCâ€¢Â¥ .I E,(ISTIN6,NOOPF20NT[/00/ - H / NANSOMAMPFRONTPO~GI--T sly=u=:=Â°r==m â„¢1,'DETILITO:MAI WEST EXISTING 9 SE:PREE A rEITI. or " SCALE 1/8- = Z 0 EE 11 0 46 8 =M.I. T T f T Dz i APOITION T. . A[Â»70}NTÂ©le w,5-0%1/0[77<>â€¢*Tool )15,120|De~./~SHe ~ | I D-9Uim I | < i 0 - ' | Ex:KEENM.L.'DP ! I cO CI= 9 TOBE~PLAGED.Â©ZI~n ' 1 A Ln ...INGS.* \ ~UU{tvt==:,k exier,Ne ,~60 A AH' SOFFITT#MAIN 1 Ex!9-ING eALCONÂ¥ exISTI#=%hf #4 ~0~RE,aVED 1 70 REMAIN = EXISTIN'.000 3101/6 WIRD,1 T. REWAiN - 1 kill p. --n - 0 0 Exis-IN6 UT,LmES TO DATE ISSLE 8*eneut:IES: --. aE RELODA./ rell L . bC.H... IG 1 ~lo :I.e-VE- 010 BE IKELaCATED 1 2â‚¬2Â·' ..SUE.-A ~BULOft*0/ , COA-/MUTE 1 EAST EXISTING SCALE 1/8- â€¢ M Scale AS NOTED 1, 'llE .OVE DÂ».,ENSION GOES liEEN WHGU] 0,1 REO JCED A 1.3 21/1 'la !4.-/.pUOU. SNOI1VA313 DNIiSIX3 OLDIA 133MI1S DNV11Â¥H M 0â‚¬5 724Â«58-5YteL.*5 .LA'll/-4/ 0 0 03 9 *D_ 1 It . . Il--Il IN] Ill Et] |=r F.MITV ' U ---[r-- 11 [1=n /7 LDÂ«- / - /0/3/lilitetyl 111Â·j & 1 '_Apik) Â»~ a=_ -f - 4 li 9, â‚¬ i ------13-11 [I] [i] FU IF ~ |~| ~ L â€ž '-,2 .1,7 # .... 1 - 7.-' W. SETBACK LINE . *' .1 e e F 01 . in + . -J 44 M I -0 5 & , 2 2 1~ 1 \: 1 f / le 111 it- [f- 1 1 . I 1 ix 1 r , I . ' 001 f h:=4,--IE 0~ i - r-[1 [ f 5-22 . Â· r.=1 14 9 1[22"- 111 L--- --ir i ' Ir--mr ; ZEÂ°lb. t) 'Un n n "- 11 -41 li || 4 26 ub 1 10 1 , q 1. 6 ~F-13: sk-titiJ 1 @ SETBACK LINE @ 0 80 e -0 r '1â€¢ I -9 F- 09 0 ~ , Iii i: e , . -1 .\t\\ 110 0 8 m Z I 22= T irr'ZTI , 0,Â·'Â· =~-0Â·e r 0 -Ef: 44 :p GAL-ba--7 111 Ill i f 'tz B 530 W HALLAM m:*m~'P~*3 i P r~'r.3..f f mgo : 213â€¢1 m . *Ri VICTORIAN RENOVATION 5 + sow HALLAM STREET 100 n 0 ASPEN. CO WMmal . e~~1121~t~~g ~ K i PROPOSED FLOOR PLANS- VIC ~ 9**:::qa'5 ''G' 3. I i .k, 1, ./.' 4 ... 31Â¥DS .[r,1 $.0.Â¥ 31VDS 13A31 NIVIN 13A31 bl3 MO1 SETBA 6/R/6//PRDI/ .....1 ..1 .... Â·IWOS Nyld 13A31 BEddn RXP~ChÂ·CIEHAMOee_.O.4 25. P.3 JF 4 e &Â§1 jil 6/ â€¢89 33; W *28 5 5~.6 A 0 -11 <411 e e 1 1.1 1 OIl <14 e Â® 1 1 CO 1 111212118*111 4 -lattmmtmt*-1 Ili11121111JI~],111[~ / 2.2 - = 0 70 I L'' aal 0 0 111%211@11 7 9 'G Gz e 61 / : :4 I ; 4' 1 ,b :" g , m ; 1. 2 7.-1..,.Â· 6, 1 U < 1 '14 e . P &2 3 ./ I i - 1~ Col ~30> 1 1 lf--1 8 8 0 8 I- -J ' 'lim cl @ @ - 4-1 =1- ~ 1 1-U Ce'igi 1 . 2 NU gÂ¥/2 8-19&52 1 2 -12 4 9. Ppi e * g A: G 8 :52/ . TWFF I i I 530 W HALL/\M im-â€¢lic: :g: Eem VICTORIAN RENOVATION 5 1 530 W HALLAM STREET >Er:/ 0 + 04 ASPEN, CO 201;12Â§122!; Ki 1221:11.#==; SOUTH AND WEST EXTERIOR ELEViLONS - VIC TICEW,&/5 *A ') 9.25 .- >ri ' tin 'il kin'Uiki.i, i, .. 7.6-COL- ~Er.,NOOP~ 1 DIA NOI1VA313 1S3M Â® Â® 0 1 0410 0 ./9Â»46 5,4AKE - I / / i . I ~En - STANDING Ell:#8143/ P 4,-NEr ~R % -or' e*le'Hee~~m~ 3 ME-AL.~00/ -O U 0 0 Rep,ACED Â£/ CLAISA~'1000 0 S.......... 8.rer--0,~- 5MOO'H ~NOOD 510:W DEMCM,TOUe El CI].GLASS ANP STEEL u:L Exle-1-51[MHeAND I -~16/ ~0~5â€¢O.IN 11 1 1 't Â® Â® 0 @ 0 NORTH ELEVATION EAST ELEVATION VIC SCALE 3'16 SCALE ..6- - "/ . .1 1.. e, 0 1.14 ..6 , 92'f '.-1/2 0 Â® Â® 0 0 Â® m Â® Â® -~Et . .1 1 *â€ž,40*Tr 2 - I"lM~I' tf:-2 il 1 10 Y]111 er--01 l~ b N 4 i.740 . i . Â·.L@ ./.Al. . 1/2 - 1 -r--Ir-1 al YE 1 J I -/ -__ r: 1.: . 11 1 21-1 I 1 H Z 1__1 63- 2 __ Melt./.6 Magge '..1=â‚¬- f_3: , 1; 2,- .... I ~ TOPLÂ¥ 1 P .=/ ILI OFNHiNG ./.S .......Fli, .. .LANS 'mULU 1'~~LÂ°UNM, U ~0 SHALL -rnâ€¢+11 - U~60 ONANÂ¥ 0 -p %4(2,~ M~AVI,t=,mmaT 2 'UnA-~ .. 2Â·e:#:9&9;4%â€žt,Z'N 8 262&KI 1 Â© __ 7 .| 0 1=!IMN Ll Â© 2&=9 I 9- 0 2:*E EZI F U pO 56q ~ f 2 23 3 97 ft ~ r---- 1 ...Â· .. i,/ i Â·. ; I . ..0 el,a=Ur 7 [AiEE~â„¢- 1.-:a r.- I = Frit ~ " ~'p ~~| ; ~05 sa FO- ~ 2 31 \ M Â· P+LE_-1-1 = " \ G \ 11 *VI'll . TV IMM* ..=67....2,= 1 1 , OPEN TO ..07, Â© 'I Crh \ mang G I Ir- , Â® Â® f YmMTtr~*TL -? W.dll/ It-1 1 1 . '111 .,2 ULJ_.1,1 __., 1 '5â€¢ -1 1 V --1 / \ ----- 2 1-Â« 1 1 ~ ~ 11Â»~43 E,q ft -m*.2, ./R.121 0 ' 1 e- i \.Â»--- /1 1,845 560 ft 4 1-2 8 4 I .... . I , 0 22 01 Â® . 0 e Â® 0 0 e DATE ISSUE MAIN LEVEL FAR- PROPOSED UPPER LEVEL FAR- PROPOSED .CH[*T 2.'' HPCSUB.I.AL SC.1 E ?716Â· , 10 SCAiE 3/B-= 1Â·~Â· LOWER LEVEL FAR- PROPOSED VICTORIAN CALCULATIONS SCALE 3418. â€¢ 14- LOFIER LEVEL GROSS 1912 SF (X 5 6%) - 101 SF MAN LEVEL 6~OSS (5 44+835) 122 9 SF UPPER LEVEL GROSS 622 SF INTERIOR FAR 1 958 9% ScaJe AS NOTED MAIN LEVEL DECKS: IF 11' 4/VE I.E..il ." FEONT PORCH 43 SF (EXEMPT) *â€¢, I. *li.,Â·Aw- UEAS- - luch l i r&/ L ~ Â£r. .i.AiEb UPPER LEVEL DECKS 1 40 SF (EXEMPT) GARAGE 555 68 (-375 EXEMPTION) 1 BO 5. Al.1 TOTAL PROPOSED FAR 1458+180. 2 138 SF INÂ¥11 VH M OES 133Â¥19 INV11Â¥H M 0â‚¬6 00 'N3dSV NOI-LVAON3kl NV]MODIA 1 .â€¢'Ill J A i i oI NVINO~ OBSOdObld - SNOI1Vln01VO ZIV:I j-- . 0 LLUU*k-- 1 - . 1 1 1 - *=I'-',T ., riâ€ž 1-. C'-JU.L%%-I :. Wâ„¢R, - KEDEREY %*23-...... :22..11,0 /7119.N - P- ~231- . 5TH AVE VIER 1:22'.BO . /14 - - ~ 2,0 al-- - 1- 4 Â·.6 - .1~ . 947 - r-7 1-1. p E- r- =i,=21~*. JI 9 1.mi= A B DE 1-- - 1- 11 -r. f=*f DATE ISSUE 1.1 R < ~ Â·251' HPÂ¢ SUB~ITTAL - SLHE<I - â‚¬ 2-â€žIl -I===maaE- Scale: AS NOTED DIRECT VIEN HALLAM -00 1 â€¢ il' *r.' D,;Ek.,4 poh u'lu. ON. INCI 4 etel %Huke CÂ·r 1~11 rL CORNER OF ETH 4 HALLAM.. iÂ·-0- AV 9.2 SM3IA~SUIV-LS S/N 'NVINO.LOIA C]3SIA3k3 1*Aff fl "IM 'Fr, 'p i Â»a 4 1# Â¢11 INV11VH M OES NOI1VAON3H NVIk]Ol.JIA 133hI1S VtÂ¥11Â¥H M 0â‚¬6 00'N3dSV . 0 I rÂ«-9 V 1 $ 4 0 EXISTING TREE ' 3 0 71 1 TO REMAIN. IF POSSIBLE ~ - -6 0 ./ 4 4 w /II//E AeRON / PRihMI . ..,t 1/2. .,// 91. - I .|1.1. I /1/1 I ........PATIARASE 4 r. 0 0 - 3 + 0 2 f FAMIL-ROOM .' .-16 .=A*~*.-mt | - * . - :1:~510:5 C: #ME'*22,5 .6 F 336,_*,- - ..~. 6./.SE =*2-ul T. COVEIKE' 9| Ni2/2'--I *MiNAL - 0, ~I.L Ill~ECT PHMI~ 10 CO~WCNCE~Ni e woÂ»~ 22E&22 1 . T......8 =1- , r 0 1 /6 CJ' A/V Ea'-MeNT 0 1110 RJ*%#/8.1 -....... MECHANICAL r 1 .4, r 1 1/.17 , I. 3 - U sr,â„¢* Â©4 1 ..11 1,1 r 7 1 11 ~ Â® 4 - Ilnen - MASTeRSUITE F -1-, 1~ UTTTV liD"/ -- ,Â«Ill 'ill Lit,04 1 '. ~0 PV . 1 11 lili 1,11 1 1 ~.1 & *%" 1 - : Ms.t-1 | | '18#1111- i; E*= .... C e 1 1111111'f 1 1 14 1 L LilluL,14 / 6 < H 1 4 .Â·.,v . 2 Ll,11-IL,14 i.. 6. ..1/1 115 1 1 1~1 HÂ·H+Â·11 -2 I.r.....~58~'-I ' 1- 11: 1 11 11,1111111 - 30 mu..... U= P -- - 6-p 1 01 1 1, 31'.1 ; z.[ r-1 ri r-1 2 - fl Â®4 - Â© ' C 21 'Er,/00.4 : M LJUU 4 KI CHEN 6 +AW.... ... 58; * 1 h ./4 1, Ir 1 - -7 4 7221 + 1 I =OOM 2 . | _32] .â€ž'.,C.,~0.L... , . a 0.....0..T.p'74 41 c-'35'7~ --7 - -/ill .5 [ir:f 7AH- 2 DATE ISSUE ILK U E '~lt SCHE~Tl{Z -- HeSUBUITTAL CEQELIZ-W 1 / '1 L 1 1. ...41 '9 + .1-,1 -1. LOWER LEVEL PLAN MAIN LEVEL PLAN UPPER LEVEL PLAN Scale: . AS NOTED sc,ir 3'16Â·= 1.4, SCALE -6Â¢= 14Â¥ SCI E .6- Â·Â· 1'Â·(r 16 A.OVE ...... c<,Es M '-â€¢â€¢,GE. I.@ Iw le&,) M 1 1),L'111![7!%L, h SÂ£.2 LJ<.1 bl3aOIAI - NÂ¥ld h3001=1 039060}ld 1VH M OES NOU A NEN NVIHODIA 33M1S 04Â¥11VH M 0â‚¬S 00'NESV 0 Â® mÂ© Â® 0 0 @ Â® Â® ll-lm' ~' ~â€ž...... 41 1 /7/ 1162Â·x G.-U--/12_21~ ]900 -0 IM*/LEVel FLÂ¥ 0 Â® eÂ© Â® 0 0 @ Â® Â® WEST ELEVATION MOD SOUTH ELEVATION VIC 5CAL' 3'1. I V. SCALE /16 ,â‚¬ Sâ‚¬ a @ F-- 0111111111111111111 3 9 0 8 i @ ImmlimmmIF 211111 C23 1 ~ 11 . 8 8 6 .-'I 2 6 -- @.1 e [-1 Â® - - ~11111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111'Ell- '1110 9 - e t= * 9 --11,111,111,1,1,1,1,11 111111111"1 1 0 ... Â¥;E 530 W HALL-AM ... HAE VICTORIAN RENOVATION Â£;m 530 W HALLAM STREET ASPEN, CO 'Gr 4.4 ti Neâ€¢-21 k i NORTH AND EAST ELEVATION -A . ~ 'A~~~~SL~ ~{) 9>5 2 4 1 ,/in.,il kiinnoki'u Li NOI1VA313 H18 0001 NOI1VA3 12/129LO~ED>~00* ~ P.. I .... L LO*-.. Ar 'ARâ€¢ 2 ../ .'' / , ''' a ,/"O - IND 3- e .1 | ./.1...... I I 2 8 94 ft 2.88.2 8 I i .T . :2~ 2,11154ft ' - '4/Sap. ' 2'' " I ./.6.0 -â€¢~,t [ 11 f 2 -====In L --. 1 --:Â·:,-1 n 4 M 11 .~ 9 -,0-1 :Illi 1 4/ i 111 -e.7 11 -........ K ...., --ir 71Â¢Isqft 1/ I - Me/NANICAL - 1 2 Magal 1- . 1 "04"/ IN tÂ·'i'' U 1--31 - :1 $ I Le, ./. Â® r- - - Â·rurrrÂ·rn ; r- 4-;iN[[IÂ¢ - " i! Il Â® Em / -7' . =sll 'iÂ¥%-- _2-1 1 . -,1 IIi 11,11'11'11 L.__11-111.1-1 Lu ...~ D blmal 1 1 , â€ž gaff 4 -.- ~ ret Ir-3 1 - T,.1011, 0-23 i 1 11 GIl i '' 1-1-1 I I - Il ' ' rÂ·11 +1-tÂ·f +Ff 1 6,1 L ..,1,1.1,.1.14 ,Â· : , L 1,1,11,1,1 ' ' ' ------- L= 111111,1, , 1 1 1 1 1, Irl r 11 m. I: AL':':"Eg.......A 1 1 - ITION' ..D W le.!GK i ..â€¢. 5/. p.0/ /14 'C 1 01 1 1,4 . , - 1 1 11 * .1/.7 1.-J,râ‚¬___-j-4 214 . . i Iâ€¢ A l Wl I Imill ./ITTE' PE'MIss,oN > - nnA 8 9 i 8 | 175 saft . 14 1 . - i)8ia--E , ti; I Ezemeatq Â© .C a 04 , Â© uuu 2-Â« - Ati AN' POINIOU' : U 2 W C 1,462 94 f: 1 4 1 , L.... 0 1- 1 \.I- 10 - - n 1 :- % 9 1 / - -33-3- 1.1 01 1 'tr-= i LIVING 1 1 7 L-1 5/LEr 111 t ......9.5. I. I @ Â®. Â© 4 I 2, 1,2- , 1,2. ,_ne I 'Â·9~ & ..0 0 0 0 0 6 0 0 44 44 LOWER LEVEL FAR- PROPOSED MAIN LEVEL FAR- PROPOSED UPPER LEVEL FAR-PROPOSED DATE ISSUE SCNE 1113 Â· 1.-0Â· SCALE )'TON 1.- 1 SCH'MAnc SCÂ·Al F ... 1'/ HICS..UITTAL MODERN CALCULATIONS LOWER LEVEL MOSS 2177 SFCX 5.196)- 124 SF MAIN LEVEL GROSS 1/7/SF UPPE* LEVEL 69055 110 SF INTERIOR FAR 2212SF ScaI AS NOTED MAIN LEVEL DECKS: = FRONT PORCH 1 46 SF CEXEMPT) U *Ul l. ... i !* .... ....ul DEES BOK PORCH <4 22 SF (EXEMPT) I. * A~*dO *..AVE UPPER LEVEL DECKS 1 6. SF CEXEMPT) eARA<35 54 7 SF (-315 EXEMPTION) 222 SF Al.2 TOTAL PROPOSED FAIK 2212+212- 2434 SF 2. 0 INV11VH M OES NOI1VAON 3H NVIHODIA 13381S INV-l IVH M 0â‚¬6 00 'NadSM Nh130~ 390d0Z:Id - SNOIiÂ¥lf 101Â¥0 hIVzl ~Af, f 1 f . It. . 41&217:Er-7 - if 1 90864'' 1.~; â„¢C 74- lw-di'~~. .\ ht 0.0,!P:.71 -- --lri.LL<' : T,VAF' 4 'M i - 1 1,~~, ; 1 .7,A ...... 6 - 4 k ..1 l 717 - 2/7-- 1 i k .....m 'Ili~~~ - .. M . imER /-- //9/"1.am#Fmqum,9 N 3Â£ A;f.?/41 <f miw.Â£ 1 1.9.1~,4 2 N f.,2 IL liki ", 1 14 ' < 1 .CiA I .* #:* tr", w %52%@Aill-8 I I G liE 530 W HALLAM _ 3 9. - VICTORIAN RENOVATION p:El=gle E 530 W HALLAM STREET Â«Â» IN . Rb 8 -- ASPEN, CO riw STREETSCAPE -rgM/2 - uÂ°- g.n: ,~ al ki r . Cl~ICATIONS laE .. A RESOLUTION OF THE ASPEN HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION (HPC) GRANTING CONCEPTUAL MAJOR DEVELOPMENT, ON-SITE RELOCATION, AND VARIANCE APPROVAL, AND RECOMMENDING HISTORIC LANDMARK LOT SPLIT APPROVAL FOR THE PROPERTY LOCATED AT 530 W. HALLAM, LOTS K, L, AND M, BLOCK 28, CITY AND TOWNSITE OF ASPEN, COLORADO RESOLUTION #8, SERIES OF 2015 PARCEL ID: 2735-124-25-004 WIIEREAS, the applicant, 530 Hallam, LLC, represented by Kim Raymond Architects, has requested HPC approval for Conceptual Major Development, On-Site Relocation, Variances and a Historic Landmark Lot Split for the property located at 530 W. Hallam, Lots K, L, and M, Block 28, City and Townsite of Aspen, Colorado; and WHEREAS, Section 26.415.070 of the Municipal Code states that "no building or structure shall be erected, constructed, enlarged, altered, repaired, relocated or improved involving a designated historic property or district until plans or sufficient information have been submitted to the Community Development Director and approved in accordance with the procedures established for their review;" and WHEREAS, for Conceptual Major Development Review, the HPC must review the application, a staff analysis report and the evidence presented at a hearing to determine the project's conformance with the City of Aspen Historic Preservation Design Guidelines per Section 26.415.070.D.3.b.2 and 3 of the Municipal Code and other applicable Code Sections. The HPC may approve, disapprove, approve with conditions or continue the application to obtain additional information necessary to make a decision to approve or deny; and WHEREAS, in order to receive approval for Relocation, the application shall meet the requirements of Aspen Municipal Code Section 26.415.090.C, Relocation of a Designated Property; and WHEREAS, in order to receive approval for a floor area bonus, the application shall meet the requirements of Aspen Municipal Code Section 26.415.110.F; and WHEREAS, the HPC may approve setback variances according to Section 26.415.110.C.1.a, Variances; and WHEREAS, the HPC may approve variances to the Residential Design Standards according to Section 26.410.020.D; and WHEREAS, in order to complete a Historic Landmark Lot Split, the application shall meet the requirements of Aspen Municipal Code Section 26.480.030. HPC makes a recommendation to City Council; and RECEPTION#: 617735, 03/02/2015 at , 03:32:57 PM, 1 OF 2, R $16.00 Doc Code RESOLUTION ' I-IPC Resolution #8, Series of 2015 Janice K. Vos Caudill, Pitkin County, CO Page 1 of 2 i 1 -- .. WHEREAS, HPC reviewed the project on January 28, 2015 and February 11, 2015. HPC considered the application, the staff memo and public comments, and found the proposal consistent with the review standards and granted approval with conditions by a vote o f 4 to 0. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED: That HPC hereby grants Conceptual Major Development, On-Site Relocation, and Variance approval, and recommends City Council approve a Historic Landmark Lot Split, for the property located at 530 W. Hallam, Lots K, L, and M, Block 28, City and Townsite of Aspen, Colorado with the following conditions: 1, LIPC hereby grants a 500 square foot floor area bonus, 2. HPC hereby allows a 5' rear setback at the basement level living space on the west lot, and a 0' rear yard setback at the basement level on the east lot, instead of the required 10.' HPC hereby allows a 10' combined sideyard on the east lot instead of the required 11.' 3. HPC hereby grants a waiver from the Residential Design Standards related to Secondary Mass, Building Elements and Build-to line. 4, For the temporary relocation of the Victorian house during basement excavation, the owner must provide a $30,000 letter of credit, cashier's check, or other form acceptable to the City Attorney to insure the safe relocation of the house. A relocation plan detailing how and where the building will be stored and protected during construction must be submitted with the building permit application, and the applicant shall include documentation of the existing elevation of the home and the relationship of the foundation to grade in the building permit application. 5. For Final review, the architect is to create a 6-8" recess of the west fai:ade of the area labeled "master bath" on the second story of the addition to the Victorian. 6. A development application for a Final Development Plan shall be submitted within one (1) year of February 11,2015, the date of approval of a Conceptual Development Plan. Failure to file such an application within this time period shall render null and void the approval of the Conceptual Development Plan. The Historic Preservation Commission may, at its sole discretion and for good cause shown, grant a one-time extension of the expiration date for a Conceptual Development Plan approval for up to six (6) months provided a written request for extension is received no less than thirty (30) days prior to the expiration date. APPROVED BY THE COMMISSION at its regular meeting on the 11th day of February, 2015. Annrdved asho Form: ~-1 A â‚¬ved s/to Content: KA-e- c>L_--- 424Wt--I 1 in, Assistant City Attorney Willis Pember, Chair A A--2 (jÂ»-0 Kathy StrickMAd, Chief Deputy Clerk HPC Resolution #8, Series of 2015 Page 2 of 2 1, . 0 .. MEMORANDUM TO: Mayor Skadron and Aspen City Council FROM: Amy Simon, Historic Preservation Officer RE: Notice of HPC approval of Conceptual Major Development, On-site relocation, and Variances for 530 W. Hallam Street, HPC Resolution #8, Series of 2015 DATE: February 23,2015 BACKGROUND: On February 11. 2015, the Historic Preservation Commission approved Conceptual Major Development Review, On-site Relocation and Variances, and recommended City Council approval of a Historic Landmark Lot Split, for the property located at 530 W. Hallam Street. This 9.000 square foot lot is allowed a single family home or two ~ detached units. Because the property is landmarked, the owner ~ '- 4 can subdivide the lot so that the Victorian is on one half of the 1. .4 411* site, and a new house is on the other half. L .A -iÂ·; The Victorian has two additions that are proposed to be ~W Â·- ~ removed, and the house will be restored as much as possible *f - back to the design shown in the photo to the right. The Victorian t 1 --- - S - will be shifted forward on the site, with an addition placed to the - -- 1 U .3 4 rear. A new house will be built to the west. 1- 1 i , 1- - I. ...- HPC approvedafloorareabonus and minor setback variances to f-4 -:.-Â« I-----2 __-,ij-h'-:--,1'1= .4 - allow the project, along with variances to three Residential 42-04Ihri.- i ... r.-3.. fy*:Niff-Qi. 4 Design Standards which were difficult to fully meet due to the ~01* -1 - z design of the historic house and the presence of some large trees on the property and in the adjacent right of way. Drawings representing the Conceptual approval are attached as Exhibit A. Conceptual review is mass, scale and site plan only. The next review step will be Council consideration of the lot split request at an upcoming hearing. 11PC Final design review of materials, windows, landscape and lighting will follow. The HPC Resolution and Minutes are attached as Exhibits B and C, respectively. The board approved the project by a 4-0 vote. PROCEDURE: This is not a public hearing and no staff or applicant presentation will be made at the February 23rd Council meeting. If you have any questions about the project, please contact the staff planner, Amy Simon, 429-2758 or amy.simon@cityofaspen.com. Pursuant to Section 26.412.040(B), City Council has the option of exercising the Call Up provisions outlined in Section 26.412.040(B) within 15 days o f notification on the regular agenda. For this application, City Council may vote to Call Up the project at their February 23rd or March 9th meeting. If City Council does not exercise the Call Up provision, the HPC Resolution shall stand. ATTACHMENTS: Exhibit A: Conceptual Design Exhibit B: Draft HPC Resolution #8, Series of 2015 Exhibit C: Draft HPC minutes from February 11,2015 IMPROVEMENTSURVEY PLAT OF: 530 W. HALLAM STREET 0 SECTION 12, TOWNSHIP 10 SOUTH, RANGE 85 WEST OF THE 6th PIM. R LOTS K, L & M, BLOCK 28 CITY & TOWNSITE OF ASPEN : COUNTY OF PITKIN, 5TATE OF COLORADO ~ SHEET 2 OF 2 LOT 1 LOT 2 LOT 0 1 REC. NO. 477706 REC. NO.477706 1.- 6 .. - . BLO& 28 AZL~ . ' EXI~ING CONMONSLEGEND ~ 2147 RIGHT-01-WAY a : â€¢ ID CAT, P.eyfAL . ' GRAVE(_ SURF#CE . rafrl,CHZ...YAL %130"1 -WIM/1 -L-- -Â»2=-32- ,-4/Â»4 =f-2 u 2,.] . ELECT/[METIA I ...:In 575 M'lir'F / 91 On'r I F 1.~31 -0-0- RE]NrEN[1 - â€¢-O - Wooot,4 ~O,cr - Â»~77 ~- CONI'~~CU;TM~E U .UOUSTREE CD,c,r,i.n...4- L . I. G.% .' -153 J to El)~~0~,gliDI'll f WOOD PFAME HOUSE Â£ SINGLE FAMILY MULTI LEVEL_ 4 . < Al,-22-1 530 W. HALL_AM ST. N Mb/1 ,.. 0,207 AC, */-lil/fsh'l~ 2 1 4-_ 1 IL.2-0.9,000 -O. Fl-. +6=r-pÂ»ilt< T//Hal- .zigtD ! f' 1 . 14.1 \ 1.L I.- 4 i . \\ -4 ll.Â·:L~ []LK-K*,ILI,T r :' 46, iAL,g~lÂ¢NUiC Illi,~ill.Cl~WtgW ~ LOTN L k. S.1 .*=.I 0 1.-rF, [524I1~12- 1 el. Xk.- 11.1*â‚¬OMIFEAUCU~ r 1~4.thka 1 " 4 Ntt:h E -ili,BEAPILL'#; *u--- \ 1 40-0 9/.I -1 ~ Frb ~. -p 40 LID -1. )\~ LOT K ~L~L F > Â« 4 i ~0 ..Â¢ 2,11' . ,~91 di# Ljj.1-aRISMCC~ 1 (C .71<,1 r.-,Iggh - : UO-1â€¢â€¢LoTâ€ž~c~co- Vit rip,â€¢NUMM,~COMrT,Le- PRO>Jtagul[]Ill'~I 11â‚¬r,~TIâ€¢~~,1.. hALLAM STREET 74.38' RIGHT-OF-WAY GRAPH]CSCALE ASPHALT SURFACE ..rT) SOPRIS ENGINEERING- LLC lill= 10.- CIVIL CONSULTANTS 502 MAIN STREET, SUITE A3 CARBONDALE, COLORADO 81623 4970) 704Â·031150PRISENG@SOPRISENG.COM Â¤,Pâ€ž1=%/I'llâ„¢I.Ul,~U ' ~'10'49' w ' - - -- .,1 1, I N '1 f Â» "0 Â¥ -- ... 1~ a,>~71ka, 'top - -et=22 .61/~~~-<2947*4 _-- - - 0. . . --239Â»4992561_ 4-31- - - ./4 I - Ul- AY. -- .-il.. - lT. ,:,2'iiiill2-, Alllkmli. 73-' 2 -- - - -42- a. - > #Mill i-l '97, In Â« 1 - - - - --Il.--- IiI 1 - .... ..I- ..... rÂ¥- 1 ,~ , -1 0 - /- 1~.B .. .. m .I"=' 1 Il~'-Â·- - -- 1 i Ilmill'. 4 t_ - C El -.:7--I -r- .. 1 -- .. ..:Ilial. .-- Â¢Â» --3 ..~ Â£ -'.'ll -,-""'' -- 6 JAmih ' . 4Â¥Mt ~ .i./1, 1<*: â€¢â€¢I.'-Hm -// 1.1 3.=1 12 1 1 1 11... .W... â€¢mE=IZZ -- f .. A . . 1 n U N FIFTH STREET d .~ 19 i 0 1 FIA IE -91) i I I r UJ I SETSACK_Ne pâ€¢zop-E:PNE. Pe.EVâ„¢ LINE 1-1~7 0 1 .- -- --- --- -/ Â·-Â·-Â·- 1-------r 1 -- 1 i r-Â·1 ' .-------; - 11 411 9 - Â» - =---------- ------ ----7 --------5 4-- 1 -1 8 4 - 2 1. - 17 $ 11 ./0Â£'Evy .INC c. -miat y Trw. 3.2 ..X 530 W HALLAM 4 Ve O @1% men VICTORIAN RENOVATION 530 W HALLAM STREET 42 .1 A ASPEN, CO / 1 SITE PLAN - PROPOSED i;fii ,1~KirnRaymondArchitects.corn 2-:,5 ~0-925-2252 ernail kirng>krai.us ag O. SNIi . , F.O.FITILI ALLEY NÂ¥ld 31IS NIÂ¥,N] -alÂ«Â« I 133UG INÂ¥11Â¥H flhole.Lag -- NIVrlg21 =1 .AOÂ¥02-1 â‚¬Nlig ~~alÂ¢N:16!x LOT SIZE: 1,000 SF LOT SIZE: 4,000 SF rla~RV.11,91,1 il. v Wee Jo U~i,JI,$ & It IM - I. . E 3 144-0~1Â¢1â€¢X~â„¢2â€¢ roe, Oeâ€¢â€¢0!6â€¢â€¢el./E~~I relm'Ice,Â·c'is,4ee fl ? T 1 1 1 ..al=ZÂ¥=1% 1 1 1 '0.EMA. rk' JA 1 N 18 EXI6'09Â£'429" 1 Pl N TD.2* -11 Blbllillill'11&38-m,Ya#i#- e*timsâ€¢â€¢sci.K N -1[HIE[[fitill.Ililliv'111111 - SJPITTO-*.4 iia e*-T-e~06~Ne P I ~~INOT.1......... EMIFINIEIFIEETI.~-AL-- e,eTINS â€žÂ»,pon 4 - P TRIMTOREMAIN [IU=-,m~1-,Inll,~1~ ~=~~-~~- 1 1 . MAIN-EVELâ€¢L. mill ~EIaEEEU~ 1~ || 1| 1 U='dilifilimildilill.i.li.~lillilillilli////3/////////I 21*2 WUMWIR/fj . 1.11. 11=6 T~ANSOL~ANPFRONT~OR)--r- â„¢16Â·02TN.9 TO -*I WEST EXISTING 9-194:5 7""frl:=ru (4/0 .GUI/416 A. /'AU UE .*LI SCALE 1/Â· = :. Z 0 6 lim 5 61& <EIGO T T T T .72./LIDWED :EE. i (IV-- 4 *I W 32 2 [1 e~IS-1,166~EENMETALROOF 3 A W rOSea1*â€¢6~ | 62 STANDINeÂ®~AM \ 1 EXIeTING,AS) /ND 1 I I I A > -16â„¢6 OMD (DHIMNE' - - 1 1 4 8 i r ...!- To REâ€ž.1,4 f *!F!% EBALOCNV ExaT,46 r,INDO),1 rR:M -CefREâ€¢,0,â‚¬2 1 ............. It â€¢4D mIM TO ReMAIN , ~ .@43 S.MITTAL 82 RELOGATED --11----1~ 1 11 c B i -i A 1 - U El EyS'ING 1.9UrES Â¥0 [)ATE SIDE 11 imi.1,1&*.im 1 'fu ' L - M HriIATIC EX,ST & 1 --- W..API COIL ./.irl EAST EXISTING SCALE 1/ 1 -O' Scale AS NOTED 400}T *Â»URE ONb INCH (' ) -W eN.HGED . HEDJn' AÂ»tr,~IUALLL,91Â£:lt.Jlk,Lkh A 1.3 ..Mor 24/1, In- IM@LU!>1 1!eu~a SNOI1VA313 DNI1SIX3 O. Spal!43..puoul V-11VH M 0â‚¬9 C]FENKB58=.-I e Â©De E 3 6-- f ... - -0 11 I lulm 1.,CA.~, -7 11 0 2211 'A r u i i L =F]F I 'rq i a ) -- IC - i 1 D I i - -1 li /3 li â‚¬ ,â€¢LINDOrl 4- r SETBACK LINE . h 1 1 1 1 , 1. , 2 1 0 e B ' ht Â® f - 1 0 7 11 2%/m n , % , 0 [-1-1 1 -: In . E- ann n 1 0 1 '\ O . 1 , 0 .1 i lu' 010 , 1 [88) 1 Mit 1 4 â‚¬01' n~â€¢ â€¢i'**in :, 161-1 n n [1 T SETBACK LINE 0 068 e ~ Eli I i P E--1] 1 la iii e 37 - 1?1~ L-4101 13% i , 1 5 CE K;, I ' m .pn i t HE25-1 Oref--t]--~~I--_-L e 0 1:1 + 121 0 1- Ht; i g=: 530 W HALLAM f"S}*UPR FilEâ€¢ P i. : -0 284 EME "4&4 le VICTORIAN RENOVATION w N Mici N z 1 04, HE HAK? M 8 1 M 530 W HALLAM STREET ~1.2 - ASPEN, CO :Â¢.2,~ 1% ~. I U. I I PROPOSED FLOOR PLANS-VIC ~ BIRE 16 :w ivrl,(),iclarch 1 .1~ t. ' ..1 r, 2 ".. '1,41 1 i k -..: '1109 ./.' =.9,1 .4 .(N ..9,t-nos NV1d 13A31 NIVIN NOOMa38/M 13A31 &13/U\01 SETBA<K LINE Â® 6*2,1,DE APRON / DRIVE+1 NV1d 13A31 *13ddn sri... M<13~ 01 Na.,O )~~.DL Lila i:â€¢22 9-6-01.i ~ DIA - SNOI-~13 hIOIh!31X3 1S3M CINV HlnOS 00 'NadSV NOI1VAON3kl NVIMODIA 2&4 , 1 RW M 0 .. r: ' a < r- W . 282: 1332119 INV-11VH M 0â‚¬6 . 11 1/9.7 :%% mage '':=r E 1 05 >1 k INÂ¥11Â¥H M OES 3 :2'.. d 0 - G G 29 9 /b 5% I :%*gg = 1 4:Â§08 e> 16.5 9 artsB2 1-1 /- e Â© 414 r. 1 0 0 8 8 r le \ LI 0 11- 1 â‚¬ CZ ' 2 NS h + : 9~ 2 O *% 4 9 An 0,1 1 0 f 2Â» 42 ---5 2. m Â¥ E? i 12 1 5 8 G) G rÂ®maiumlil. e e 51 1 e 291 0 0 111 4 22& 1 111 Â£ 5 h 60& *2 m: 022 * 99, RECONBâ„¢( DIA NOilVA313 1S3M .- 1.gic avos 11 1_731I 8 11111111 0 & I 11~-1 !11111111111111 r.[-EX 0 0 e. e f 44 OP mi â€žau 1% 2~4~ IZ I, Â»-- 20*@1; amit 1.<\ \\ @ C 4/ 6 â€¢'-11 1/4Â· 1 1 0 8 2 - 8 1 11 - . #3 44 1.. 'N . 4 Rd " 0 0 lo e 530 W HALLAM 7.%.8 1- =*M~n IMPA VICTORIAN RENOVATION ..C ita . . w M 4 c*m . ~. n : ip ~~ig/"i.i:~ -- 530 W HALLAM STREET F : 2 - ASPEN, CO hd~9Ed K i NORTH AND EAST EXTERIOR ELEV~NS - VIC E#*122:2 ,:I~.wiRag.~~.i,~~In, ,"te,t il kirii' .A =.9- 31Â¥09 .0-,t =.96,Â£ 3.39 DIA NOI1VA313 1SV3 NOI1VA313 HlhION I. C.IwNEÂ¥ I. 42*r'241~ ASS INDIT.EL INC.STANPIN. _cr'll../. 1 09 4-* l. I 'I it'rl--.Ck-/11 d..T U /2 Ar I f ' i fill li i 1#11/ 1 1 4 LI 1 1 Ill 1.11 - 111 'J :I ' 1 - 0 I ==I 4-Â» -- L.1- Â· 1 1 1 le , i' 1 p. 4 4 . // L I 11 ~\ 1; 1 i *1 4 1 D 1 4 j ~ 11 42 Li 11 * j }1~ 4 1 4, 1 530 W HALL-AM J>!24%i' 1 ne= 4 i < imill : VICTORIAN RENOVATION 352 6& P. 530 W HALLAM STREET 2 M=*22@11** 1 K. ASPEN, CO 44~:85;n REVISED VICTORIAN, N/S STAIRS~VIEWS "111'51~ 70 925 1 .in, H i':,k iÂ©)9417::I,~ Kin,R iviliriridArÂ·line. h, ri,in â€ž0-It - 1,2/â‚¬ WV-11Â¥H MEIIA 103&!ICI 5TH AVE VIER 0-1, - -11Â¥11Â¥H P H.LG 30 33NhIOO t 1 .E_ .Â· .1 Â· 11. 4 f -r . 4- 4- 6 m " R Z L 2&25 r -1 P 'REE*: 1 9 $ 1, ; 0 + 12 9- Â¢ C [J| | VW- U U Â· . 0' ica mil 11/1'\1 TÂ¥~Al 2 -lk--- a 'INPOIN ./.0/ e E=- 1=7 1 0 i 1 1 Tift._CLUL-- ~' 0 ~ ~ !1 18 3. N f. 4-32= - .-- 1 j e _-1 i C 21 In] Ijc 1 2 $*p - 1 /1â‚¬ ....... 1 - I L u ~ L 12 Aft ~- 11 2 -. 5 11. g t- ser/Ack LINE A. J.... , 61 n $ ClÂ·J~ '-- 3 r 0: â€ž/ 2. 4. .2 --h~ -4. A./1 rn mir PROPERTY LINE 7-1/7 9 1/~ff 1 .1,2. f e 0 I 7 UPLX]lk- i I I 1- M I lin 16=LL .....05 - 1 .1 9 le a EEIE EE *= W ~i~t - fil 0- 510 Â® 2 2. K "ts/lf<1.22 530 W HALLAM ~ 1 E VICTORIAN RENOVATION tn r- 181 1 2 1 1 hf Z i 1 530 W HALLAM STREET ASPEN, CO Hfwmm . - PROPOSED FLOOR PLAN - MODER~ ~|1}it ~ kirnR/yinonciA, 1,!lects i / k linej. 1 * .WE 31Â¥06 #' = ~9UE 31/DE .0-,1 =:.WE 31Â¥~ NV1d 13A31 M3ddn NV1d 13A31 NIVIN NÂ¥ld 13A31 hl3M01 ' L I _~ C ~007,~lae L...... Irr . 1 ..4 ........ VEâ‚¬ED 11 1 , k_/ r O .0 7 1 eARA65,73?N/p/* LOFNER 'OOF AT 'ARLASE HS.C..11.0.1.1 Q I Allka 91 a.. SS ..Le-CE:L ~ W~ â‚¬ JU Pâ€¢4~1Â£3 1~,~AT1(1NB 0 0 Â©Â© 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 r A ./3 cl'..Flm JÂ»\ \ /A, --. 4 ______1*WEE=~[_cÂ»Ll=I Dr==/JL==N--1-1_1_ _ /1 - .0/ 0 C.=UM=.1 _t_ j --1 Â® Â® eÂ© 0 0 0 0 0 e WEST ELEVATION MOD SOUTH ELEVATION VIC SCALE ./ . 1'/ SCALE /10-â€¢ 0 @ 11 1 LI,11111111 | ~ IllilliLILJI~ ~1 0 - 0 2 111111111111---~111'~fl ] 0 0 f 1~ e e Z 0 0 0 I 4m 1-1 . 4111 11111~1111111111111111111111111- 0- e - O - mi Z e mi ii e m e -- 11 1 111111111 -1 e 1- 0 0 14' 530 W HALLAM UN 39 - El:0 8~El C . VICTORIAN RENOVATION il'El =331 Â£ â€¢E ll m 530 W HALLAM STREET A i !11 1Â§ 2* 64#0*@ 12*Z~ 1- -- 6, ASPEN, CO Iii i Ki NORTH AND EAST ELEVATION - MQ~ 1& Mf'i,LE - !94 â€¢' .1 *#hN.KimR/yinon,!Architectâ‚¬. 4-(,in 7Â¥-_|rÂ¢8 nS OdH , DOW . POINT OF L =.9/' 3./.S 1,1.111 e'.11 .. A RESOLUTION OF THE ASPEN HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION (HPC) GRANTING CONCEPTUAL MAJOR DEVELOPMENT, ON-SITE RELOCATION, AND VARIANCE APPROVAL, AND RECOMMENDING HISTORIC LANDMARK LOT SPLIT APPROVAL FOR THE PROPERTY LOCATED AT 530 W. HALLAM, LOTS K, L, AND M, BLOCK 28, CITY AND TOWNSITE OF ASPEN, COLORADO RESOLUTION #8, SERIES OF 2015 PARCEL ID: 2735-124-25-004 WHEREAS, the applicant, 530 Hallam, LLC, represented by Kim Raymond Architects, has requested HPC approval for Conceptual Major Development, On-Site Relocation, Variances and a 1-listoric Landmark Lot Split for the property located at 530 W. Hallam, Lots K, L, and M, Block 28, City and Townsite of Aspen, Colorado; and WHEREAS, Section 26.415.070 of the Municipal Code states that "no building or structure shall be erected, constructed, enlarged, altered, repaired, relocated or improved involving a designated historic property or district until plans or sufficient information have been submitted to the Community Development Director and approved in accordance with the procedures established for their review;" and WHEREAS, for Conceptual Major Development Review, the HPC must review the application, a staff analysis report and the evidence presented at a hearing to determine the project's conformance with the City of Aspen Historic Preservation Design Guidelines per Section 26.415.070.D.3.b.2 and 3 of the Municipal Code and other applicable Code Sections. The HPC may approve, disapprove. approve with conditions or continue the application to obtain additional information necessary to make a decision to approve or deny; and WHEREAS, in order to receive approval for Relocation, the application shall meet the requirements of Aspen Municipal Code Section 26.415.090.C, Relocation of a Designated Property; and WHEREAS, in order to receive approval for a floor area bonus, the application shall meet the requirements of Aspen Municipal Code Section 26.415.110.F; and WHEREAS, the 11PC may approve setback variances according to Section 26.415.110.C.1.a. Variances; and WHEREAS, the 111?C may approve variances to the Residential Design Standards according to Section 26.410.020.D; and WHEREAS, in order to complete a Historic Landmark Lot Split, the application shall meet the requirements of Aspen Municipal Code Section 26.480.030. HPC makes a recommendation to City Council; and 1-IPC Resolution #8, Series of 2015 Page 1 0 f 2 .. WHEREAS, HPC reviewed the project on January 28, 2015 and February 11, 2015. HPC considered the application, the staff memo and public comments, and found the proposal consistent with the review standards and granted approval with conditions by a vote of 4 to 0. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED: That 1-1PC hereby grants Conceptual Major Development, On-Site Relocation, and Variance approval, and recommends City Council approve a Historic Landmark Lot Split, for the property located at 530 W. Hallam, Lots K, L, and M, Block 28, City and Townsite of Aspen, Colorado with the following conditions: l. HPC hereby grants a 500 square foot floor area bonus. 2. 1IPC hereby allows a5' rear setback at the basement level living space on the west lot, and aO' rear yard setback at the basement level on the east lot, instead of the required 10.' HPC hereby allows a 10' combined sideyard on the east lot instead of the required 11.' 3. 11PC hereby grants a waiver from the Residential Design Standards related to Secondary Mass, Building Elements and Build-to line. 4. For the temporary relocation of the Victorian house during basement excavation, the owner must provide a $30,000 letter of credit, cashier' s check, or other form acceptable to the City Attorney to insure the safe relocation of the house. A relocation plan detailing how and where the building will be stored and protected during construction must be submitted with the building permit application, and the applicant shall include documentation of the existing elevation of the home and the relationship of the foundation to grade in the building permit application. 5. For Final review. the architect is to create a 6-8" recess of the west faqade of the area labeled "master bath" on the second story of the addition to the Victorian. 6. A development application for a Final Development Plan shall be submitted within one (1) year of February 11,2015, the date of approval of a Conceptual Development Plan. Failure to file such an application within this time period shall render null and void the approval of the Conceptual Development Plan. The Historic Preservation Commission may, at its sole discretion and for good cause shown, grant a one-time extension of the expiration date for a Conceptual Development Plan approval for up to six (6) months provided a written request for extension is received no less than thirty (30) days prior to the expiration date. APPROVED BY THE COMMISSION at its regular meeting on the 11th day of February, 2015. Approved as to Form: Approved as to Content: Debbie Quinn, Assistant City Attorney Willis Pember, Chair ATTEST: Kathy Strickland, Chief Deputy Clerk H PC Resolution #8, Series of 2015 Page 2 of 2 .. MEMORANDUM TO: Aspen Historic Preservation Commission FROM: Amy Simon, Historic Preservation Officer RE: 530 W. Hallam-Conceptual Major Development, On-Site Relocation, Historic Landmark Lot Split and Variances, CONTINUED PUBLIC HEARING DATE: February 11, 2015 SUMMARY: 530 W. Hallam is a Victorian era home with 1970; and 1980s additions to the east and rear. The applicant proposes to demolish the non-historic additions to the house and move it towards the front and west. The lot is to be subdivided so that the open yard on the east side of the Victorian can be developed with a new home. A floor area bonus, setback variances, and Residential Design Standards variances are requested. HPC discussed this project on January 28th and continued it for restudy. In particular, the architect was asked to look at the front fai;ade of the proposed new house and a staircase element on the Victorian. The garage on the proposed new home was to be redesigned to meet the rear setback requirement. Staff and the applicant were asked to get clarification from the Parks Department as to which of the large conifers in front of this house could possibly be removed. Attached are drawings which staff finds address all of the HPC's direction. Staff recommends approval with conditions outlined in the attached Resolution. APPLICANT: 530 Hallam, LLC, represented by Kim Raymond Architects. PARCEL ID: 2735-124-25-004. ADDRESS: 530 W. Hallam, Lots K, L, and M, Block 28, City and Townsite of Aspen, Colorado. ZONING: R-6. CONCEPTUAL MAJOR DEVELOPMENT The procedure for a Major Development Review, at the Conceptual level, is as follows. Staff reviews the submittal materials and prepares a report that analyzes HPC Review 2.11.2015 530 W. Hallam Page I of 14 .. the project's conformance with the design guidelines and other applicable Land Use Code Sections. This report is transmitted to the HPC with relevant information on the proposed project and a recommendation to continue, approve, disapprove or approve with conditions and the reasons for the recommendation. The HPC will review the application, the staff analysis report and the evidence presented at the hearing to determine the project's conformance with the City of Aspen Historic Preservation Design Guidelines. The HPC may approve, disapprove, approve with conditions, or continue the application to obtain additional information necessary to make a decision to approve or deny. Major Development is a two-step process requiring approval by the HPC of a Conceptual Development Plan, and then a Final Development Plan. Approval of a Conceptual Development Plan shall be binding upon HPC in regards to the location and form of the envelope of the structure(s) and/or addition(s) as depicted in the Conceptual Plan application including its height, scale, massing and proportions. No changes will be made to this aspect of the proposed development by the HPC as part of their review of the Final Development Plan unless agreed to by the applicant. Staff Response: Conceptual review focuses on the N ir * e# *4 I height, scale, massing and proportions of a proposal. ~1 U--'Â·, i A list of the relevant HPC design guidelines is E K ic i /' ' i attached as "Exhibit A." ' 11 t The property being reviewed by HPC is Lots K. L, fl 2 and M, seen onthe 1904 Sanborne map at right. The ~ 1 1 11 11 :04t ' home that was located on Lot M was demolished at 9 4-1 4 -~ M . 44 1 tal an unknown date. 1 a; 1 1 1 * =./py :dZ ..~ .~ -. -1- - .-y 4 3 The Victorian has been expanded 1 1 Lill , lilli!!U!1111. 7 43 in two directions; towards the alley . 27-9 - A-=4 $ .;..~,1 and towards the east. The photo at le left shows the original design. though 6 + ift :.1- 92--QIZI~-- b/40,;.+ in a deteriorated condition, in about - 'R the 1950s. A photo on the next page - 1 -- - '" shows the home in 1980, followed by - 1Â© pâ€ž- â€ž a current photo, illustrating how the *.( L j house has become significantly 6 - - : ~ ;Â« hidden from view by large trees. 4- .. - .//f /6.2. i'lilil. ' HPC Review 2.11.2015 530 W. Hallam Page 2 of 14 MI 7 zix I 12 - Â· 4.- 20 V . 4 .3. 11 11 %. ..t . + I PA â€¢â€¢t. . -- 1.. 4............. J.1/./. .... 7 +* I x./%:I, .. 1 1 I -I. % -- Ta .-I 9*/4*0Â·4 4 .*2%%39:59, ,it *~ ~ 146'll"'11/1/Il:Imilligi I ... 4.2 'Ir 4.9.4,/IN.lawl r *â€¢41 7.Â« - a I * Ret ..3 112 8/12"%0/"I"I vÂ¢20*3 , .42 -- 14+~i,40Et?4 1 * ' 4 -- 4 11 424 f>' ..4 . 1 . 4.1 * . 4- ' ir' 4,;,â€¢0* Â¥..k 0 6 36,1 . ...>le M. ' ..9 4' ..11% 1 -309 ~ ~ iâ‚¬ - ''c y -"/5 .1 I. I r' :>14' 1. 1 9.*61,1 y,/2 . C 1 ./ . C .1.':42>. /:,Â·f i .ctÂ·, h . r i , -1 -74 -1 , >f -- 41 1 1/X . I 1- 1 /./ 24 L Vi. 1/ â‚¬ 1 1 1 1 I - 4 -4 V f. y HPC Review 2.11.2015 530 W. Hallam Page 3 of 14 .. Staff finds that the proposed project represents a successful preservation approach for this Victorian. Historic landmark lot splits have proven to be an effective way to reduce the size of additions to historic resources by transferring most of the square footage into a detached new building. The applicant is proposing significant restoration of the Victorian. Removing the two additions is in itsel f is very important to re-establishing the original form o f the building, which has become very muddled. In terms of the addition to the Victorian, staff finds that all of the design guidelines are met. The addition is distanced from the back of the Victorian with a one story connector. Overall, the form of the addition is simple and related to the historic house. The proposed new house must draw references from the Victorian, but not copy it. The architect has re-worked the design so that the front part of the new house is a single story living space with gable roof forms and proportions that are similar to the architecture of the Victorian period, but distinguished with a flat roofed entry, and modern detailing. The proposed building is simple and pushed well back on the site because of the legacy tree that must be preserved. In terms of site plan, staff finds that the proposal is appropriate. The Victorian is on a slightly smaller lot than the new house, with less floor area assigned to it. which is the goal of the lot split. Setback requirements are met except for minor exceptions, addressed below. The required parking is provided on the site. The City Forester has performed ;- additional ...ak assessment of the trees r F /- T.+T tti , bordering the site and will A-]r f 1 '1,4 1 47 4/ , recommend two be removed; 1 l r:,1 1 one on each frontage, as - : 1 ' ,,Â·~ iÂ·'i .-2-1~~-i~. indicated to the right. These =41â€ž:=* 4- r,â€¢0 1,--L trees, which are on City right- i 1- of-way, are overcrowded and q F . 0 / 8 0 1 1 4- show signs of illness and 9 ~---*J i stress. These tree removals 9 - will dramatically improve the .1% Pal public visibility of this historic house. AN..al.. ... -U.. 1 9 1 1 ...3~.Ffil - -. t- f~ 'LÂ¢ 'f - 4%. - 4-Â»1 4 '.t J )1 *f.- b 74-".46. .. FLOOR AREA BONUS In selected circumstances, the HPC may grant up to five hundred (500) additional square feet of allowable floor area for projects involving designated historic properties. To be considered for the bonus, it must be demonstrated that: a. The design ofthe project meets all applicable design guidelines; b. The historic building is the key element o f the property and the addition is incorporated in a manner that maintains the visual integrity of the historic building; c. The work restores the existing portion of the building to its historic appearance; d. The new construction is reflective o f the proportional patterns found in the historic building's form, materials or openings; e. The construction materials are of the highest quality; f. An appropriate transition defines the old and new portions of the building; g. The project retains a historic outbuilding: and/or h. Notable historic site and landscape features are retained. Staff Response: Staff finds that this project is appropriate for a floor area bonus because of the benefits of the lot split. All original features of the house will be preserved. In addition, the applicant will re-roof the Victorian with wood shingles, reconstruct the chimney to the original design, re-use the existing foundation stones as a veneer and ensure the new stone foundation matches the height and character of the existing, reconstruct a missing original double hung window on the ground floor of the south fagade, and match the porch trim to what can be seen in the photo. SETBACK VARIANCES In granting a variance, the HPC must make a finding that such a variance: a. Is similar to the pattern, features and character of the historic property or districts and/or b. Enhances or mitigates an adverse impact to the historic significance or architectural character of the historic property, an adjoining designated historic property or historic district. Staff Response: The project meets all setback variances, except that the basement level of both houses requires a 10' setback, not a 5' setback as drawn for the Victorian, and a 0' setback as drawn for the new house. This has no effect that is seen by the public. The new house is 1' shy of the required combined sideyard setback requirement, providing 10' instead of 11.' HPC Review 2.11.2015 530 W. Hallam Page 5 of 14 .. Staff supports the variances as a preservation incentive. ON-SITE RELOCATION 26.415.090.C. Standards for the relocation of designated properties. Relocation for a building, structure or object will be approved if it is determined that it meets any one of the following standards: 1. It is considered a noncontributing element of a historic district and its relocation will not affect the character of the historic district; or 2. It does not contribute to the overall character of the historic district or parcel on which it is located and its relocation will not have an adverse impact on the Historic District or property; or 3. The owner has obtained a certificate of economic hardship; or 4. The relocation activity is demonstrated to be an acceptable preservation method given the character and integrity of the building, structure or object and its move will not adversely affect the integrity of the Historic District in which it was originally located or diminish the historic, architectural or aesthetic relationships of adjacent designated properties; and Additionally, for approval to relocate all of the following criteria must be met: 1. It has been determined that the building, structure or object is capable of withstanding the physical impacts of relocation; 2. An appropriate receiving site has been identified; and 3. An acceptable plan has been submitted providing for the safe relocation, repair and preservation of the building, structure or object including the provision of the necessary financial security. Staff Response: Staff finds that the forward and westward relocation of the house meets Criterion 4 above, in that the move helps to distance the historic resource from the new construction. The move is not insignificant as the house will be placed 15' in front of the location and just over 5' west. The only other historic resource on this blockface is at the opposite end of the block. It is a miner's cottage that has not been moved and is about 10' back from the front lot line. As part of a building permit review, the applicant will be required to submit the standard assurances that relocation will proceed with care. HPC Review 2.11.2015 530 W. Hallam Page 6 0 f 14 .. HISTORIC LANDMARK LOT SPLIT The split of a lot that is a designated Historic Landmark for the purpose of creating one additional development parcel shall be approved, approved with conditions, or denied by the City Council, pursuant to Section 26.480.030 - Procedures for Review, after a recommendation is provided by the Historic Preservation Commission pursuant to Section 26.415.110(A) Historic Landmark Lot Split, and according to the following standards: 1. The request complies with the requirements of Section 26.480.040, General Subdivision Review Standards. A. Guaranteed Access to a Public Way. All subdivided lots must have perpetual unobstructed legal vehicular access to a public way. A proposed subdivision shall not eliminate or obstruct legal vehicular access from a public way to an adjacent property. All streets in a Subdivision retained under private ownership shall be dedicated to public use to ensure adequate public and emergency access. Security/privacy gates across access points and driveways are prohibited. B. Alignment with Original Townsite Plat. The proposed lot lines shall approximate, to the extent practical, the platting of the Original Aspen Townsite, and additions thereto, as applicable to the subject land. Minor deviations from the original platting lines to accommodate significant features of the site may be approved. C. Zoning Conformance. All new lots shall conform to the requirements of the zone district in which the property is situated, including variations and variances approved pursuant to this Title. A single lot shall not be located in more than one zone district unless unique circumstances dictate. A rezoning application may be considered concurrently with subdivision review. D. Existing Structures, Uses, and Non-Conformities. A subdivision shall not create or increase the non-conformity of a use, structure or parcel. A rezoning application or other mechanism to correct the non-conforming nature of a use, structure, or parcel may be considered concurrently. In the case where an existing structure or use occupies a site eligible for subdivision, the structure need not be demolished and the use need not be discontinued prior to application for subdivision. If approval of a subdivision creates a non-conforming structure or use, including a structure spanning a parcel boundary. such structure or use may continue until recordation of the subdivision plat. Alternatively, the City may accept certain assurance that the non-conformities will be remedied after recordation of the subdivision plat. Such assurances shall be reflected in a development agreement HPC Review 2.11.2015 530 W. Hallam Page 7 0 f 14 .. or other legal mechanism acceptable to the City Attorney and may be time-bound or secured with a financial surety. Staff Response: The application, to split the lot into one 4.200 square foot lot, containing a relocated Victorian home. and one 4,800 square foot lot, containing a new home. meets the criteria above. 2. The fathering parcel is listed in the Inventory of Historic Sites and Structures. Staff Response: The parcel is listed on the Inventory of Historic Sites and Structures. 3. No more than two lots are created by the Historic Landmark Lot Split. No more than one historic landmark lot split shall occur on any one fathering parcel. Staff Response: Two lots are created. 4. In residential zone districts, the allowable Floor Area for each new residential lot shall be established by allocating the total allowable Floor Area of the fathering parcel to each of the new lots such that no overall increase in Floor Area is achieved and no individual lot allows a Floor Area in excess of that allowed a similarly-sized lot in the same zone district. An equal distribution is not required. The allowable Floor Area for each new lot shall be noted on the Historic Lot Split Plat. Any Floor Area bonus already granted by the Historic Preservation Commission shall be allocated to each individual parcel and shall also be noted on the plat as a square footage bonus. If the properties remain eligible for a Floor Area bonus from the Historic Preservation Commission. the plat and subdivision agreement shall specify the manner in which this potential bonus shall be allocated to the two properties if received. In non-residential zones districts. the Floor Area shall be calculated according to the limitations o f the zone district applied to each new lot as permitted for the use. The total Floor Area shall not be stated on the plat because the floor area will be determined by the use established on each parcel. Staff Response: The allowable floor area on the fathering (existing) parcel is 4,080 square feet. The applicant proposes to split that, plus a requested 500 square foot floor area bonus, between the Victorian home (2,138 square feet of floor area) and the new home (2,434 square feet of floor area). 5. The Historic Lot Split Plat shall be reviewed and recorded in the office of the Pitkin County Clerk and Recorder. pursuant to Chapter 26.490 - Approval Documents. No subdivision agreement need be prepared or entered into between the applicant and the City unless the Community Development Director determines such an agreement is necessary. Staff Response: The plat will be filed subsequent to historic landmark lot split approval by City Council. HPC Review 2.1 1.2015 530 W. Hallam Page 8 of 14 .. RESIDENTIAL DESIGN STANDARDS The project does not comply with the Secondary Mass design standard on the new home. The link between the primary and secondary mass is wider than the 10' that is allowed. The existing single-family home (the Victorian) is exempt since it is not new. The standard says: Secondary mass. All new single- family and duplex structures shall locate at least ten percent (10%) of their total square footage above grade in a mass which is completely detached from the principal building or linked to it by a subordinate linking element. This standard shall only apply to parcels within the Aspen infill area pursuant to Subsection 26.410.010.B.2. Accessory buildings such as garages, sheds and accessory dwelling units are examples of appropriate uses for the secondary mass. A subordinate linking element for the purposes of linking a primary and secondary mass shall be at least ten (10) feet in length, not more than ten (10) feet in width, and with a plate height of not more than nine (9) feet. Accessible outdoor space over the linking element (e.g. a deck) is permitted but may not be covered or enclosed. Any railing for an accessible outdoor space over a linking element must be the minimum reasonably necessary to provide adequate safety and building code compliance and the railing must be 50% or more transparent. The project does not comply with the Building Element standard on the Victorian, which says: A covered entry porch of fifty (50) or more square feet, with a minimum depth of six (6') feet, shall be part of the front facade. Entry porches and canopies shall not be more than one (1) story in height. The project does not meet the Build-to-line standard. which requires 60% of the front fa~ade o f both buildings to be within 5' of the front setback line and 60% of the Victorian to be within 5' of the setback line along 5th Street. In order to grant variances, HPC must find that the proposal will: a) Provide an appropriate design or pattern of development considering the context in which the development is proposed and purpose of the particular standard. In evaluating the context as it is used in the criteria, the reviewing board may consider the relationship of the proposed development with adjacent structures, HPC Review 2.11.2015 530 W. Hallam Page 9 of 14 .. the immediate neighborhood setting. or a broader vicinity as the board feels is necessary to determine if the exception is warranted; or, b) Be clearly necessary for reasons of fairness related to unusual site-specific constraints. Staff Response: Staff recommends the variances be granted. Secondary Mass Staff accepts the applicant's argument that the lot with the new home is constrained by the large tree at the front of the site. The project needs to push back to avoid damaging the tree. therefore providing a detached Secondary Mass, or a narrow linking element, is less feasible than in other circumstances. Building Elements The feature that does not comply, the front porch on the Victorian, is a historic feature that should not be altered from the original design. Build-to line The Victorian has an irregular footprint at the front and cannot be redesigned to meet this standard. The new home cannot be moved further forward on the site because of trees. The project as represented also requires a variance related to the glazing shown on the front of the new house. Window design is reviewed at Final and will be addressed at that time. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends HPC grant Conceptual Major Development, On-Site Relocation, Historic Landmark Lot Split and Variances with the following conditions: 1. I-IPC hereby grants a 500 square foot floor area bonus. 2. HPC hereby allows a 5' rear setback at the basement level living space on the west lot, and a 0' rear yard setback at the basement level on the east lot, instead of the required 10.' I-IPC hereby allows a 10' combined sideyard on the east lot instead of the required 11.' 3. HPC hereby grants a waiver from the Residential Design Standards related to Secondary Mass, Building Elements and Build-to line. 4. For the temporary relocation of the Victorian house during basement excavation, the owner must provide a $30,000 letter of credit, cashier's check, or other form acceptable to the City Attorney to insure the safe relocation of the house. A relocation plan detailing how and where the building will be stored and protected during construction must be submitted with the building permit application, and the applicant shall include documentation of the existing elevation of the home and the relationship of the foundation to grade in the building permit application. 5. A development application for a Final Development Plan shall be submitted within one (1) year of February 11, 2015, the date of approval ofa Conceptual Development Plan. Failure to file such an application within this time period shall render null and HPC Review 2.11.2015 530 W. Hallam Page 10 of 14 .. void the approval of the Conceptual Development Plan. The Historic Preservation Commission may, at its sole discretion and for good cause shown, grant a one-time extension of the expiration date for a Conceptual Development Plan approval for up to six (6) months provided a written request for extension is received no less than thirty (30) days prior to the expiration date. EXHIBITS: Resolution #_, Series of 2015 Exhibit A: Design Guidelines Exhibit B: Application Exhibit A: Relevant HPC Design Guidelines for 530 W. Hallam, Conceptual review For the Victorian 9.1 Proposals to relocate a building will be considered on a case-by-case basis. In general, relocation has less of an impact on individual landmark structures than those in a historic district. It must be demonstrated that relocation is the best preservation alternative. Rehabilitation of a historic building must occur as a first phase of any improvements. A relocated building must be carefully rehabilitated to retain original architectural details and materials. u Before a building is moved, a plan must be in place to secure the structure and provide a new foundation, utilities, and to restore the house. u The design of a new structure on the site should be in accordance with the guidelines for new construction. u In general, moving a building to an entirely different site or neighborhood is not approved. 4 Site the structure in a position similar to its historic orientation. It should face the same direction and have a relatively similar setback. It may not. for example, be moved to the rear of the parcel to accommodate a new building in front o f it. 9.6 When rebuilding a foundation, locate the structure at its approximate historic elevation above grade. o Raising the building slightly above its original elevation is acceptable. However, lifting it substantially above the ground level is inappropriate. o Changing the historic elevation is discouraged, unless it can be demonstrated that it enhances the resource. 9.7 A lightwell may be used to permit light into below-grade living space. 1-{PC Review 2.11.2015 530 W, Hallam Page 11 of 14 0 0 >Â© 000 0 .. In general, a lightwell is prohibited on a wall that faces a street (per the Residential Design Standards). The size of a lightwell should be minimized. A lightwell that is used as a walkout space may be used only in limited situations and will be considered on a case-by-case basis. lf a walkout space is feasible, it should be surrounded by a simple fence or rail. 10.2 A more recent addition that is not historically significant may be removed. 10.3 Design a new addition such that one's ability to interpret the historic character of the primary building is maintained. u A new addition that creates an appearance inconsistent with the historic character of the primary building is inappropriate. u An addition that seeks to imply an earlier period than that of the primary building also is inappropriate. 1 An addition that seeks to imply an inaccurate variation of the primary building's historic style should be avoided. 3 An addition that covers historically significant features is inappropriate. 10.4 Design a new addition to be recognized as a product of its own time. zi An addition should be made distinguishable from the historic building, while also remaining visually compatible with these earlier features. 01 A change in setbacks of the addition from the historic building, a subtle change in material or a differentiation between historic, and more current styles are all techniques that may be considered to help define a change from old to new construction. 10.6 Design an addition to be compatible in size and scale with the main building. 01 An addition that is lower than or similar to the height of the primary building is preferred. 10.7 If it is necessary to design an addition that is taller than a historic building, set it back substantially from significant facades and use a "connector" to link it to the historic building. c] A 1 -story connector is preferred. u The connector should be a minimum of 10 feet long between the addition and the primary building. o The connector also should be proportional to the primary building. 10.8 Place an addition at the rear of a building or set it back from the front to minimize the visual impact on the historic structure and to allow the original proportions and character to remain prominent. 1 Locating an addition at the front of a structure is inappropriate. a Additional floor area may also be located under the building in a basement which will not alter the exterior mass of a building. HPC Review 2.11.2015 530 W, Hallam Page 12 of 14 00 0 .. u Set back an addition from primary facades in order to allow the original proportions and character to remain prominent. A minimum setback of 10 feet on primary structures is recommended. 10.9 Roof forms should be similar to those of the historic building. Typically, gable, hip and shed roofs are appropriate. Flat roofs are generally inappropriate for additions on residential structures with sloped roofs. 10.10 Design an addition to a historic structure such that it will not destroy or obscure historically important architectural features. o For example, loss or alteration of architectural details, corniees and eavelines should be avoided. For the New House: Building Orientation 11.1 Orient the primary entrance of a new building to the street. o rhe building should be arranged parallel to the lot lines, maintaining the traditional grid pattern of the site. 11.2 In a residential context, clearly define the primary entrance to a new building by using a front poreh. 3 The front porch should be "functional," in that it is used as a means of access to the entry. o A new porch should be similar in size and shape to those seen traditionally. o In some cases, the front door itself may be positioned perpendicular to the street; nonetheless, the entry should still be clearly defined with a walkway and porch that orients to the street. 11.3 Construct a new building to appear similar in scale with the historic buildings on the parcel. o Subdivide larger masses into smaller "modules" that are similar in size to the historic buildings on the original site. 11.4 Design a front elevation to be similar in scale to the historic building. The primary plane o f the front should not appear taller than the historic structure. The front should include a one-story element, such as a porch. 11.5 Use building forms that are similar to those of the historic property. u They should not overwhelm the original in scale. 11.6 Use roof forms that are similar to those seen traditionally in the block. o Sloping roofs such as gable and hip roofs are appropriate for primary roof forms. HPC Review 2.11.2015 530 W. Hallam Page 13 of 14 EC 00 .. Flat roofs should be used only in areas where it is appropriate to the context. On a residential structure, eave depths should be similar to those seen traditionally in the context. ci Exotic building and roof forms that would detract from the visual continuity of the street are discouraged. These include geodesic domes and A-frames. 11.10 The imitation of older historic styles is discouraged. This blurs the distinction between old and new buildings. Ilighly complex and ornately detailed revival styles that were not a part of Aspen's history are especially discouraged on historic sites. HPC Review 2.11.2015 530 W. Hallam Page 14 of 14 UC 00 0 . ... February 2, 2015 Amy Simon City of Aspen Community Development Department 130 S Galena Street, 3rd Floor Aspen, CO 81611 RE: 530 W Hallam Ave Summary Letter, Revised Aspen, Colorado Parcel ID: 273512425004 Dear Amy, Thank you for your knowledge and direction regarding this property and the process required to renovate the historic structure and to do the lot split for a new residence. The following information will address the changes made to both the Historic home and the proposed new home since the Conceptual Review on Jan. 28, 2015. This property is located in the R-6, Medium density, residential zone district. 49 _25 - / , -Ir '44.11 &-G % P. . *1 543#Er - -t : * == . 1 3.1 ' 90. 802 E. Cooper Avenue, Suite 4 I Aspen, Colorado I 81611 I 970.925.2252 fet .. 26.410.040 Residential Design Standards A. Site design After meeting with the City Forester, we were asked to move the Victorian back towards the East by at least a foot to place it further from the trees along Fifth Street. We did adjust it, so it is now being moved 5'-3" to the West, rather than 6'-5". This affects the required frontage dimension that applies to the West side of this building because it is on a corner lot. This places the Victorian 6'-0 from the setback line at the rear of the original building and 9'-3 3/4" at the narrower, front portion. The linking element is 13'-2 14" from the setback. This exposed 7'-3" ofthe rear of the original structure. Thus we need a variance from this design standard; so we can save the trees. This puts all of the construction a minimum of 5' from the drip line of these trees. The proposed home on the newly created lot to the east will be set back 30'-0" from the front property line, starting construction at the line of the existing wall of the front addition (that we are removing) to ensure the safety of the legacy tree. Pushing the new home back this far on the lot, requires a variance from the design standard of having the front door within 5' of the front setback line. The benefit of this, beyond saving the large tree, is that it sets the Historic resource 18'-0" in front of the new home; making the Victorian the prominent structure on the property. B.1. Building Form The Victorian will have a single story element that is 16'-10", linking it to the new addition at the rear. The stair element, which was a big concern to both staff and the members of the HPC; has been moved to the East side of the building so as not to be a dominate feature on the west or street facing side of the building. The single story element continues past the stair element to the north so the two-story element has a break in the faÂ¢ade facing the street. The windows have also been simplified in this stair element, eliminating all windows that face the street, in response to a comment about too much light from this element being a distraction from the historic resource. The roof of the addition has been simplified further, with the pure gable form being the dominant feature of this element of the building. Small areas of flat roof are used for the stair element and over the rear of the upper level to be subordinate to this gable form. No dormers are visible from Hallam street on the addition. The front fagade of the new home has been redesigned to lower the gable roof over the living room. The gable form has been emphasized by walls that frame the windows on this fagade and connect to the roof overhang, making the gable form the primary element of this home. The pitch of the roof is the same as the Victorian at 12/12; but the spring point is much lower on new home. 802 E. Cooper Avenue, Suite 4 I Aspen, Colorado I 81611 I 970.925.2252 .. The new home has been re-designed to pull the garage off the alley, to be within our 5"-0 setback; in response to the strong feelings of the neighbors and the HPC. The secondary mass of the new home has a single story element that is 12'-4" from the gable of the living room. The roof of this rear element is also a very simple gable with small areas of flat roof being subordinate. With all the confinements on this property from the large trees and the legacy that will be saved, we are asking for a few setback and design guideline variances. D3.a We are seeking a variance from the "no window zone" between 9'-12' in the new home. Since the gable form is obviously not a two story element and is very shielded from the street (and the sun) from the legacy tree, we are trying to get as much light as possible into the building. The design of mostly glass in this element gives the simple gable form a modern twist without fighting for attention with the Victorian. The new home is also 30' from the street, being less dominate structure on the lot. EZ. Inflection. There are two story homes on both sides of this property, though the one to the West is across the street. The house directly adjacent to the new home is the largest on the block with most of it's two story mass on the front setback line. The new home on our property is a single story element at the front, with the gable being shorter than the Victorian, but not so short as to be dwarfed by the home to the East. Neighborhood characteristics: Photos of the neighboring houses have been added to your packet. There are mostly two story homes on the block. The homes to the immediate east and west are both two story; the flat roof house, two doors to the east is also two story. The alley that we use for access, has two story buildings along it; two of the homes directly behind our lot have two story buildings. Across the street, there are two story homes and another flat roofed home and a small miners cottage. We feel like the proposed homes on our lot fit very well in this diverse neighborhood. Thank you for yourtime and consideration of this project. We look forward to working with the HPC again. Sincerely, Kim Raymond, Principal Kim Raymond Architects, Inc 802 E. Cooper Avenue, Suite 4 I Aspen, Colorado I 81611 1 970.925.2252 - I .."6%91*A, rd-0 b.er -r - - ACL 1 1*#*- I!~ml~~2'jib,L - - ., 241'- . + 4/0//2,M/49/ 1. -CLEÂ¢ b- - 1'1521 1/...ji. â„¢i62 , E..10+ .- *p.41< 6 f h - 0.....34 .4 *t- Zip- .. - - . ..3-In. Ir - -- - 1. ---17 1 .% - - 1 - Y ...m\ \ - --0-471- - --Ill- ---- W. - -- 6 -- -- L11 2-#til'liall- . .....ak 7/1.1.k /- .11 -- - mairmz..C- - 0 .1/iri1mlill' ./luil::,2---:I,-S-/Ille .. .2 2 - .- I . 0. ~-ADAâ‚¬=7 1-Uâ€ž ...35.- . - ..I Al - > ..I-X...F=in ,-Rl I 4 - - Vt - - -- - - -- ,= 1, 0 'i & t . 0. .. ~ 51,1 - â‚¬ -- -1 - . h..2442.Â·=z=.m =- . 0 . ...1 ..St : 1 0121 1' ~ -- . 0 9 . I - -" .1,1 -9 ....1- . .. . . 1,+ - .. --- - :7 1 - t I .-- - i,ir- -'-- I ./... miaill -....S- lili. 4 -il - 1. E lill 1 . . . , 21,1 - . A - A . ... .. 1, .... V) J f0 LOT SIZE: 9,000 SF I ALLEY LOT SIZE: 9,000 SF E O / / ExeÂ·r,Ne Â·râ€¢RE Xh ,4/ TOREMAIN 1~ POSâ„¢45 FROFERT~ LIN' Â· u G 4 N 6........0./ 0/1....1 .AR.I. A-IN ./.1,n.Al 0 Ul ecT//8 LINE Â® 1 Â® SNeâ‚¬.K LINE >N E N 1 . -4 ., 'J 1 .r- m F- . Z (XI g, 8/ 1 1111111 Ebl 1 1 -,-2-1.- 58 1 ,- Ill//I' 2 6 E f L- f- _------- -WJN~~~_~ :Ill'llrill//. 3 R 1 1 1 E- - 3- | 3 f C~Â¥0-1 , IUM --0110 ~IllyECTS % All 'F,%1(6~ IrEA' APRANCE-4â„¢ AND PLANS INDICATED BY ~HESE DRAWINGS AND SPECIFICA.IONS ./E TIE PRO. E. T. AND AND S)~LL NEITHERBE USEDCÂ», ANÂ¥01,â‚¬. WO,1/ n **TwevER *,*, WRIT-, PERMISSION ICA BE USEDSÂ¥ B.nHER PERSON,0.4 ANY USE WRITTEN 0-ENSIONS S-L TN(E PRECEDENCE , -.......1.-.-.- 4 -Â«E) OVER 5CALEO D-NSIONS AND SHALL GE VERIFED | | AT Dâ‚¬ SITE ANÂ¥ DIMENSIC- DICREPANCY r -- ARCH,TECT PRIOR Â¥O /01-ENCE, ENT OF.CRK SMALL BE -OUGIT TO â„¢E ATTE.I. OF â„¢E I i ~ Ll,luL,lb 1 11,11111/ lit-' EXISTINI TREE TOREMAN . Â£ EM 1/ -IliW -47-- E 11 1 1 li cl~ i i - i Â£ EXÂ·ST + 6 TREE TO BE ...9 4 1 1 12 F = MC 'ED PE' 6 71-- i 1 1 m -2 12 m r . 1 4 i I I 3 -- --~....::~S- 1% rJE r \) 1 = i i L EXISTIN' TREE IL.-1 1 iF I POICâ€¢. I ' 1 1 --3..MAIN - 1 .....CK LINE 1 $ E- 1 9*/CALINE~ -I -- 1 1 4 ~ 5'-0 â€¢ fÂ« tâ€¢ ,1 OPERTÂ·r LINE v~l/v C + R (' 8 14 SCHEMATIC DATE ISSUE EXISTINÂ® TREE EX STING LEGICÂ·Y- TREE TO REMAIN EXISTIN' .... 1 26 15 HPC SUBM1TTAL TORCMAIN ./ 0 9 '7 : / ExISTiNG TREE To BE //7 . 702 BE REMO p ,MI, REMOVED PER CITY ~f~~RES-r~/ ' rA ExiSTNe Tâ€¢ZEE , TOREMAil 64Â»r Scale AS NOTED HALLAM STREET r ./E +CUE DIMENSION DOES NOT MEASURE ONE INCH '1'i EUCTLÂ¥ THS DRAWING VAL HAVE BEEN ENLARGED OR REDUCEO 5./TrNG ALL LABELE' SCALES 2 SITE PLAN 1'8 - 1'.0 A 0.2 Pblted On 28 15 u.,03Â·sjoal!4=uvpu 0390dONd -NÂ¥ld 31IS FIFTH STREET aN!1 42--~-I IAIV11VH M OES NOIiVAON 3kl NVIHODIA 13381S INV--11Â¥H M 0Â£9 00'N3dSV 0 . . EE <liTIOITO'El-/'Sll/ 8 -A =C~C-15-E=~'=â€¢EW~~ Ta RE'â€¢14:EMOL Sâ€¢â‚¬3 1, @j ITT T T p-1.14". -cm.IMis-,10 0 E 1 ZE .U f = -----------4------------- -----------+ 1 Ex'STING BRICK CHIMNEÂ·r -emi TO REMAIN-~----~ -0 w C ., - *All Illd 1,12~ 111111111 P-r--9 11 GR#3,~3,<Iv~Ull lilli lEi lillil ExISTING FASCIA AND SOFFI- EN TOREMAIN 1111_11111111 0/&11 11*A 11111111 L---1------------L-JUUJUJUL-_-_-_-__- exaTING PASceâ€¢ AND > N SOFFIT TO REMAIN (O 1 E.STING.IN.O. TRITO.EMAIN --IMWArd.IM-I Illillillillillillillilll Ill Illillillillilll 1 'PPER -E,L PLY 14--1'AmeRIBiildiiiiiii.LiifiLliiLiLLVALTiiiiiiiii.11 8% . .% '~ 6 ANI TRIM TO .EMA N EXISTING â€¢'NOOP SIP'h16 AND ]1 8 al I~iElli~ Bl B â„¢ TegEMAN . -3- >Cm EXISTINS I,NOO~ ZBB 0 ./1,1 TORE.Arl/9 Al L DFA,;44 Im' AARANGED,FNTE AND P,ANS IND~CATED h THESE DRAWINGS AND SPECIFICATtoNS ARE THE PMO~ERTY AND EXIST NG .000 -O'E33.- --*<- li / 1 COPY'ORT OF KIM RAYMOND ARCHIECTS ./ TRAN.O. AND FRONT 'CRI. --t -1, i i Â·Â·ORÂ·Eveâ€¢FOTHERPEASONâ€¢â€¢00** AND Sl,UL NE,ThE. DE USED 0. ANY In ER WORK TRMPETAILITORMAN WHATSOEVER WITHO. WRITTEN PERMISSION WIDUE,1 0~IENSIONS SH,ILL TNâ‚¬ PNECEDE,KDE WEST EXISTING AT THE SITE ANY DIMENSIONA' DISCREPANCY OVER SCALED 0-ENSIONS AND SHALL BE VER'FED SHALL BE BROUGMT TO TME ....10. OF THE ARCHrnECT PRIOR TO CO-ENCE,EN, OF WORK SCALE 1/8- = 1Â·-0 /1~CE~TURÂ¥ .-ET T T T ./CITIDI TO BE â€¢pliTION .... Â·es-olic.1 AcceÂ· >. Te BE ~ DEâ€¢â€¢Oileâ€¢â€¢El IN/Lleâ€¢â€¢Er ~ 'NO Imâ€¢Â·'ll~1*Ev.D.le-MU EXSTING GREEN META. *COF 1 TO BE RE-LAGIC ,Â·Tâ€¢ Z NO i I STING NG SEAM ~ 1 1 LATZ ' --54- I/,rih E.16/1/6 'All!/ AND 1]117111111111.Jigjm===' SOFFITTOREMAN~~~-nTTTTT1TTTTTTT-i-EP>/ \>â€¢. 1111111 I Eller:/65.-CON' EXIST.6.IN.O. T. M 00- TOBE REWÂ©/ED TO REMAÂ·N rn-T-rT-T, 1 | lillia .00.3.Ne ANC TRIM TO ....iN ~ , EXISTIN' UTILITIES TO L_______11 i -t- 1 1L__1 EXIST]Ne SIDE -OR// 55 e..O"rED -----~ 1'26'15 .FC SUBMITTAL le 1 Â¥1 B -BE~EM =- 1 1 E O EXISTINe Wril;TISS TO DATE ISSUE SE RE.OCATEP 1|1 i 9 814 SCHEMATIC E.,STING | 2 1 60//CHUTE - BU-<HEAD / EAST EXISTING SCALE 1/8" = 1'0- Scale AS NOTED . THE -0 Â·E Il/ENS,ON DOES NOT MEASURE ONE iNCH ilÂ·, EXACnY THS DRAWING WILL HAv E BEEN ENUARGED O. REDUCED I ECTING .. .....SCALES A 1.3 PIHed On 20 15 sn- SNOI1VA313 DNI1SIX3 INV11VH M ES NOI1VAON 3kl NVIHODIA 133hI1S INÂ¥11Â¥1-1 M 089 00'N3dSV .... . GARAGE APRON / PRIVEINAY~ i U W W SETBA<& LINE Â® E------------------1 1 1 .r- =3 k 1 1 1 --, I , , i tki _1 -------t----- ROOF .............. ~ SE ..11- 1 1 1 - - 1 1 - 1 1 1 -- 1 61*&M&22M,1111 H : - ~ . 18 11 | I #t. -Â£'.#") Vi, I~ E ' - - lk==2~11 - ' Ici_ _______________ _Â»J .......or./ 2 1 IL 1 ' ' CLEAM d 4 -AMENOLOSURE r' LA RoeTE~-1 -b CN .. - ...A.2 ~ I .5 1/2 > N BEOR/ob/J 1 1 26 LL_1,1--2--' ~r-~ 4 - 13 ... - C 6- A E -3.. 1 - 41 . LAU DRY Z 4 1 1 | |' p ~ - - i,-1 l ) 2 * NErrHER BE USED 0, ANY ODER VOâ„¢ 1 1 1 00 All DES!,6 I.AS ARRANGEUENTS U. PLANS ~2"f INDIC.,0 B. THESE DRAWINGS AND I N MASTER SUITE ~ SPECIFICATIONS ARE TME PROPERTY AND * / 1 ././-7 OF KIM .........ECTS ./ I~ -t ' 2 m . MUPROOM ~ ' NOROEUSED"ANÂ·r OTHERPERSONMANYUSE /~ECHANICAL ,â€¢ WHATSOEVER WITHOUT WAÂ¢TTE' PERMISSION -3-2_/EZI__ - WRITTEN laâ‚¬NSIONS SMALL TAKE PRECEDEDÂ£E OVER SCALED D~ENS,C,S AND Sâ€¢â€¢ALL RE,iâ‚¬/FED s-226 81..... AT THE S,IE ANY DIMENS~C~AL -CRE..Â¥ DE'Or - ' . I SHALL I -OUG,6 TO â„¢E ..Em'. OF â„¢E 1 -1-7 ARCHnECT PRIOR TO IC-ENCE&,EN1 OF WC~K 1 CO#122 1- cd.i-Lul 1 '4344 11444 14 -7-~1 ~~ I f Â·Â·' - , 1 111'11 1 0 1 1 1 1 1 1 &: 1~-1=== Â·~i~' ~- r--' 8 -~ J ) 1 7 1 8- 8 CLOSET 1Â© KITCHEN k f qi; 21 | PECK E EDROOM 3 r 91 - 9 -9 j E 1-1- 1 -11 ~= Ill -- 7-,2 3 I 11 Â£ I1 ,/ ,. TO ..4- - L- 9.. I -li-11 BATH 3 - . I. A...12 Tre D _EL \ FP E J 3 1/2 5.0 51/2-/. 1 4..5 - V - 1 L_-1 - -i 1 f //1 - DININ' 1. 1 5 Â· - 1 L J p C-thâ€¢TPASOVE ~ FAMILY ROOM TV LIVING ADD STEEL AND AOÂ¢>C OPEN TO BELOR/ @ n 4 Â® 1-- 30 *.2 G : i l 1 - / a ==~ - \ Â·IÂ·&:|P~- REIR= -1 : I ..8-43/4 . DRE~SER ,/-4 8/4 . r + t . - 1 2 --r-~- ull - all- 1 2 Wl 3 , 3 -0 -_li~_=I : /1 .' 2 / 0 1 BEDROOM 2 | 1Â£ . 61 1 01 ZI PORCH -+-it 1 DATE ISSUE 1 L // f 7 /,t~~0rft----- ~-- / tn : 8 4 SCHEMATIC FRONT PORCH Ul Â« ~\/ff\--,24--7-1-I-3 2. E HIC SUBMITTAL mil D L V UNe<,CxTrR~V- 1 --1124 - -1 - _ ._ _ _02LL//p/.n- - - 1- 2.-0 m I. SR,;BACK LINE@) ~ - LOWER LEVEL W/BEDROOM MAIN LEVEL PLAN UPPER LEVEL PLAN SCALE 3/16 1 0 SCALE 3 16Â· = 0 SCALE :r16 = 1-0 Scale AS NOTED i. T HE ABO. DIMEN.ON DOE NOT MEASURE ONE INCH W EXACTLY WS C~Mi~ING Vi'ILL ,4*v E BEEN EN~ARGED OR REDucEr ACrE'-1*A~i LAaE EDÂ«â€¢,FÂ© V ..ed On 20 15 ll! l) D- S 1|VI,vp.Ol DIA -SNÂ¥ld BOO-I:I 0390dOhld FLOAT!46 RS STEEL STAIRS INV11VH M OES NOI1VAON3kl NVIHODIA 13381S INV-11Â¥H M 0Â£9 00 'N3dSV aNI-I >IÂ·3991 l - 11 -1 _Ii'..11.11111111-1 '~!111'11'1111 11 11 11 -1111111[1-1 0 11 Id 1 --11 1111 11 @ @ I lilli 11-1 1 3.... 74@19 111 4 0 0 l 25 m > x I . 9 . m I fi y:=27 Â¥2: i:Â¢=5 118 23 C5 WER,La:i M: - :80:2 UNCE Ek : I ....2 - 11'r-11 Ill- 1 1 U f ~---- -.1 \\ \ 9 III [ 1-] 11 1-1 f 1 ,1 14' 1 41 , 8-111Â£*Ll e i knal L 0 8 -L - L , b // 0 U /11 ./. :: A. :& 9/5 :* Ba :Mr :3 Ig :6 2 8: 8 : 0 1 8 0 F a T rn r~ Z AA J . 2:,0 1 . 4 99:Â£ t 530 W HALLAM &9*ut.. Â»15Â£92'fl- M < 4* p VICTORIAN RENOVATION Hdg/Ld.: W EAN 5 30: . A- 530 W HALLAM STREET : %1~128:'"mu - ASPEN. CO 43.;p.8:Ri:., */340.4 . 1- -- 23%:213213*r K 1 NORTH AND EAST EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS - VIC E FEHNINEâ‚¬ 717723 21 -S U 4. ' PT:2 .I 3 "~411,1-.11' 2711 Câ€ž122 :,", ..,Â·, DIA NOI1Â¥/\313 19Â¥3 NOI1VA313 HlhION U. 21 1969 . 11 /3: R I '04 6 1/4 -10/ 0 I.Z 969 00/ 1 nle dia Q* 93* i dw' 00 6 r e U 1 lilli 111 1 e '4 iaL. \ \ e ' 1~ il 4 49 + e Nba \ \ i: --r- tti~ ~ i ttlti [1' g: Ull 1 i.1-1-1,/1/ 0 ./ 'TTT-Ir.-TIn:~'1TTT 0,5 - 11! 1! 1 9 I =1 If==111 09 0 _3 6 GA 24 8 <D K 4 _c I R i 4 2 1 5 2 88 9 0 P Â® & 6 __~ _21[z 13) 3/.4 ~~ ' C . g f 0 i. i OlD A d :m 3 M gR ) 84 67 : qi 1-11 ~11 11=1 1 1 i 1- 1 8 11 1 8 0 0 i. r. 0,~ 7% ! 6--41-10.=1 . 1 7\ 1 1 -21 \ 11 ~ liLli 1- 1 -=01 1 1/r// lN @ 1 @ 9/ ' r j bL=' F --1 T Â£ . } rn U... 2#Yili 1 , 28& 4452 *Â£35" 1 8 1 ' 0"; 0#ia 2 :OG r , 71 :pi Me< 19 1 -A ~# 7 94 :2, ai20& 1 86 i NA :' Ll g 1,1 : m 5 fa Ir, O: 9 8 1.*lA 530 W HALLAM r.21&91:11=1 ... m A~Â·*~2%2~9%~.3 80& VICTORIAN RENOVATION 530 W HALLAM STREET 1 5.'iM:14 . i- ASPEN, CO 4.Hz/48:5 A~ t 1 ... :*Mi*0,3~it; K 1 EamoNâ€¢*3252- ww w. Kit-nRay nioric] A M hitect..corn SOUTH AND WEST EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS - VIC '45E1?%3*5.: lei 9/0-92Â»22 42 ernail kirrieokrai.,ic. NE. CH~Mut Im.13+3 NI- 0 DIA NOI1VA313 1S3M 031.ON SV aieos ~THE BF US DO A 8 1/2-I;/ 5Â·/ 3 '/2~Il W.1/2 . , -A r--- 1 r-- -----Ii----- . L- ROOF OVE........0/ ~. /. 1 . 1 . - 1 0 ./ 01-21 1 - Er LEI_lL_.IL ' 1 1 ' 1- 11 Fi U STCAMÂ®MOr: 1, I 8, 5,ASS .~60?k-2 ~ Al 1 3 0 .Al'- r : I 552.ft .-1 1 623 54RT 33- T i GARAeE BEDROOM 4 . /~-4/ */ ' I b 213 1. 4. 1-- ---- r.-g 1 1 _14 9.- 1 .. . T O SLAC men~ ry - " Â· id--8 ZI LAUNPRÂ¥ If - Pm G i. 1 1 - 1 1. f\-3 0[ F n n - | MASTER SUITE ~MEGMANIGAL 2 WOROOM Â§ I I - 2 1..... ' C P.Â·r 1 I .--,r , ......0- 1 4-3 _1 1 ./ '=LIEâ€¢ .L- 1 - BE 'liP-9 1 /1 1 - 1 1/ 1 !DI INDICATED BY THESE DRAWINGS AND 4444 Al ( DESIG< 1[Â¥Al ARRANGF-N. AND PIAN. 1111lili 11 Agi | ~|k i*446' SPECIFICATIONS ARE THE PROPERTY AND MI â‚¬ UP' 11'11~1~ , 11 11 11 COPY'OMT OF KI' RAYMOND ARCHIECTS 'il ' 1 I lill'1111 111 AND ./LINErTHERSE USED ON ANY OTHER WOR,~ NOR eE USEDBVA~ OTHERPERSON ~OR uUSE WHATSOE'i'EN WITHOUT Vi~RITTEN PEMMISSION OVER SCALED DIMENSICÂ»,S AND DIALL I VERIAED -1 [2 . 'C,1 ARCHIECT ROR TO CC-â‚¬N/EMENT OF Im' AT ./ SITE ANY DIUENSIONAL DISCREPANCY .h 'Rt'fTEN g~ENSIONS SMÂ»1. TAME PRECEDENCE F' LA 1 11 1 1 SH~L BE 88* TO â„¢f ATTE~10~ OF â„¢E 1 CLOSET 1-- -11 1 KITCHEN ~R= --4-' 1 ' : 813 DECK /6312 4- E EEPROOM 9 ~ A ~5695,~ 0 23394 ft 0 L 0,2-/ 5 ~~2~ 4.4-1Â¥ 2-'Â¤~-0 I . -/ s./1 J==f - - 8. -0 ~ ~ BATH 5 0 ~ 1 - 51'2Â» 24-' D/4 1-3 I i 695 51_fl -- 3 3 1/~, 1/'*Or 2 3 j ' L DI~[Ne_-1 ~ . FAMILÂ¥ ROOM ~ . ope. To.,ove -<il**,1-,1~0---r- TV LIVING *,Â¥ze.AND-000 OPEN -0 BELOA ~ ~BATH 2 G -liu"el. VOLU.le id) 6 ACÂ·40-CMED-* OR PE~~O~-0/ 6. 4/'.I'//-1 .1/ ..- -In- -Uaâ€¢MMet.* T O PÂ·. Â¥ "2-8-- 2!IRY 4 i i =1 I BEDROOM 2 . 1 ....11 1 1/17_ 5 1/2:F..1 .T - - - - - ...ER ENT'-ROOF I I I L 43 sqft - <.~~3:+ 0 4- ~ 42: 0 4-- 3 e. 1/4 1,845 94 ft Â¢ Â¢ 0 ....'42 , .AUL 'BOVE 22-0' 4 -- 9 Â·8'4 SCHEMA"' DATE ISSUE MAIN LEVEL FAR- PROPOSED UPPER LEVEL FAR- PROPOSED HPC SUB/l.AL 1, Al F 1 4 ' f SCALE 3/16' = 1 -O LOWER LEVEL FAR- PROPOSED SEA.5 3 le Â· r VICTORIAN CALCULATIONS LOMER LEVEL GROSS 1 912 SF (X 5696) - 101 SF MAIN LEVEL GROSS (59 4+635) 1229 SF UPPER LEVEL eROSS 6 22 5F INTERIOR FAR 1 4 58 SF Scale AS NOTED MAIN LEVEL DECKS: F THE ABOVE DIMENS'ON DOE FRONT PORCH 43 SF(EXEMPT) NOT MEASURE ONE INCH i EXACTCY T119 DRAWING V,MU HAvE 8EEN ENLARGED OR REDUCEr AC./-1-A_L LARE.%.CA E. UPPER LEVEL DECKS 1 90 SF (EXEMPT) GARAeE 555 EF (-315 EXEMPTION) 180 SF A 1.1 TOTAL PROPOSED FAR 1 q 58+150- 2138 SF P.,led On 26'15 51-1'll,_1>1(li'll.11>1 Ilell-1 77-91 6 ()/f) 1 1 rEEL STAIRS FF IndTV INV11VH M OES NOI1VAON3kl NVIWODIA 133hI1S INÂ¥11Â¥H M OES 00'N3dSV 1.-'.I / 2=2222 U 0- ... I 92%7:2 NVIMOJOIA 0390dOEId - SNOI1Vln01Â¥0 BÂ¥:I .... . C rc â€¢4 .7 C.1 ./ --- --,0.~ PEA -1- Il OFS,Gl ,#AS ARRAN~MEN. AND PLANS 1 1- EICATED BY THESE 01@AWINGS AND SPECIFICATIONS ARE THE PROPERrÂ·r AND COPY./. 0. KM RAYMOND ....ECTS INC A,ID S~LL NE'MER. USED ON ANY In ER WORK Nom DE USEDBÂ¥ A~ OTHERPERSON ~OR ANÂ¥ uSE -MmIOUt -InEN PE-ISSION W~UfYEN 0-NSIONS SMALL TAKE PRECEDENCE AT TI 'TE ANY DUENSICâ€¢,AL -CREPANCÂ¥ Sâ€¢,ALL 82 8~0~ff TO â„¢E ArrE,nO. OF TWE ARCH,rECT -OR To CC-,ENCE'IT OF.Â©RK 1..= 4 h#AMMZmr---*--*L. &-- - 5TH AVE VIEFY 1:24.80 OVE'SC~LEDD-ENS,(Â»IS*.DS,tâ€¢aBEVER,FED I /0 -r- 1,--'-- - L - - ~ "~ ------~ DATE ISSUE 5194 W - - ir.=a= . b â€¢ 1 8 4 SCHEMATIC - ' t- 3 - --1 - . - 1 --- i I - 9.: -* Â· 20 Â· f HI>C SUBMITTAL I --- Scale AS NOTED DIRECT VIEFY HALLAM 3/8" = 1 '-0 c ./E ABCME ./.ENSION DOE. 40~ MEASURE ONE INCH /1 EAACTI TIS CR*,~ING WILL HAVE 1 .EEN ENLARGED OR REOUCE' -fm . ~AEE. En 7 Al Fr CORNER OF 5TH 4 HALLAMâ€ž . 1'-0" AV 9.2 Pblied .i 2/3/15 't '1~ wi, 4, r, r " \ 1 KI ..1>~CÂ®LUI>~ p ES ZZ-SE 6Â· 0/ 6 ial SMBIA 0Â£ SMIV.LS S/N 'NVIBO10IA D3SIA3B ' 03-513 -'|Ii| '\/IJ.JOLL,Ae>-lilli>!-A/\AAA/\ '41*f â€ž1 'r 'Fr, 'p . a "*44 Â¢ INV11VH M OES NOUV/\ON3H NVIHODIA 0 11 j 133819 INÂ¥11VH M 0Â£9 00'N3dSV /Â«-9 v 1-1 6 4 0 C EXISTING TR~ 0 TO REMAIN, IF POSSIBLE -.~ r 0 . 0 : 0 0 - 3 GARAGE APRON / DRINEAAâ€¢f â€¢ k ..C Â· 1.-10 1/2 ....... + 226 2 I /1,2 /6 6-51// I ...ER ROOF AT GARAeE ISETBACK LINE 1 - 7- â‚¬ 0 - 1 1 r - 1 1 - 1 Ik F FAMIL- ROOM , ~< 1- 'r 01 1 12 4~ ------ 1~ ---------- -~ 6"ASE 2-3 1 COVEREP 4 ' PORCH ' ,Â·. I. I_/e 14 1 -- 1- . I .% A/V E/Ul/MINT 2 -Et. 11 â€¢ETBAR | - |%â€¢ 1 ADS-ED 9-*991 1 IN r 1 5 1 ENC.O.U.E A - 1] â€¢ MUD22â‚¬K Â§ ~ < MECHANICAL ~,--~ - LAUNDRY ~1 W - ~ ' STORAGE 1- M 11 1 5 2. U 1.-'. 8 777,4 1.-0 (B--- 1 1 E-lfl Â® 01 ~_ F 0 9 1*1 + 0 Fv[!Ill i s - \ -K-~9~~7- MASTER SwITE ... Se - TO .... r,-L 1 1. 1 1 T-T- E[o 1 lilli I ./.DER /1 0 1- 1 01â€¢ T r LILLL! LI.ld ~m"al ./.6/1 r- --I Z Illilli , F" 2.- 19 f.?.'. ~ 1 1 5% - . I -1 1 1 .. Â£*98 ~AL AT sr.- 5, |I| 0 109 Q 1- #31 I O BUTLERS 11 Ill,111 I h 26- . 5./ 1/2 .1' : 3Â¥ . .1 I rull+UÂ·Â·~lf DECK 1-ANTRY f 1 11111111 9 - - L Illu Elly t Illili'11 1 - 11111111 r _11% 1 - * OFFICE - a Z IBIL â€¢clonro,ep,-e. , - I lilli lilli-- V.Er ..4(7 -In IN ~ 1 61 i -8 5 :-0 -5,/21-14 I l gi EDROO. 4 1 Â© r 1 1~ I 1 Uuu xi-CHEN a.-- I ~ 8,4- H AND POIDER ~ ~ DINING f - 7 118'lib 11 . 1 - 1 rl 1 1 . 1 -1 *lESSER Tv~,ALLT_~ ILL J*:Â» 1 . P - 1- 19 - 1 2 ./I....LASS BER.00' ~ I~ il~I ~ - TO --~ .....,0...... 33-3 b f=71 LIVIN6 ~-----~ BEDROOM 2 f : ENTI* 2 - | U U ~ Â© FRONT- FORCH ~ ~ 11-7 -1 rht-1 1 J. E---ruch - 1-1 1 IL-4-_-1 F |/ 6-'034 r 3 + 1 31-1 1 3/4 1-'1 ..Ul -1. LOWER LEVEL PLAN MAIN LEVEL PLAN UPPER LEVEL PLAN SCALE 316 SCALE 3 le = 1 l SCALE ' tb' i Lily L./ 4/ 3Nll Alh13,3Ohial 41, HIJMUDDLL, 14 lieu-,a r c, 7 7 -C. r (6- { 1/ i. 1 0 1 :2294*'882: ll, 03 - 577/ 11 4 D-I vp l.1 â‚¬)ll,/U'>1,1 Il>I /VÂ·\ /V'.//\ M~ii,i 9 CIOIN- NOUVA313 163M ONV HlAOS 1 N 544.20# 3 ZIED*zE:'ENE ==:â€¢=06",4 00 'N3dSV -, E-4 (N Illillillilimill illillillillill Illillillillill .5:202*2:. : 1 3 Z . io!.. ' 2/..*~..~~~.~.~~.4 --- E H *Sdil M. 4 133hI1S ]AIV11Â¥H M 0Â£9 3 s NOI-LVAONBM NVIHOLDIA MAN ~ ~ ~a-~ I m U. ..4 5 52*@222=94 INV11Â¥H AA OES cm f um g 2 +A :8zâ€¢,rE9_.i- - i - /7/'-I . e e 0 0 e e 0 - Z 0 LU - -1 LL| : I e e 1- b 1 IT D I OW U) : @ 71 lili 1 1 11 0 0 2 1 @ @ . 0 - @ I' 9-, ..42 / 1 G 0 - @ lu '1 I lu r 4 G 8 8 Wn#XMAES OOIN NOI1VA313 163M Al,=4-13'll R 'E /f- ./Â¥ .0- .9~ F 31VOS 9 0 â€¢ il 1111111 7 1 /. lo -tÂ« 111111 0 0 1 lilli IiI 1111,1 loll :E U J Pt . Â® 8 0 e e \11111111~111111111111111-L ff[1111111~1111111111111111- e e 0 - 0 x 4 0 - e 1 - i i .g.= 1111111mill 0 e -2-1/ U ./4/I-&2Ooz Crn~~~ 1, 530 W HALLAM ./::1-4;..0-J -merr I . m 4..â€¢282*ii:2 D I.: & VICTORIAN RENOVATION R Omek.22.*â€ž2 9 '6529 - ES.== a Â»*m Et:**:b.. lill:goes; . G. T C 1 @DI :..isip. 15:-' u w WN j Rehiq:V & =K 530 W HALLAM STREET 20*1.92c,-AL .WII in-- Â£11 Nd ASPEN. CO LAile!/,Ii: lili o.:Ell %9*Unty' K 1 Â¥4*6â€¢14-Â·Â· NORTH AND EAST ELEVATION - MOD 4.5~W~ tel 9/0-921,-2252 email kirrieÂ»krai.â€ž5 21.*:5*-NÂ· wv,/Vv killi|-t, 1Â¥11 1, 11 11|Ar, hliects.corn NOI1VA313 HlkION COIN NOI1VA313 1SV3 IM LO~NER ROOF AT GAR 0 0 0 I , 1 -0 I T.. 0/4- I I H. 1/2. .2-5 ' I . I . - 1 - I 1 r L 1 FAM!LY ROOM , . ---- fu-1 - 1-22-2-0-- - 7 11 2 2 8 sq FE L --24 . h I GARASE 4 f Â· 22Â·-5 1 i 2,11 -7 4 ft 222m .j , Tee- 54. L : 1 I -- 1 1 f E A/V EQUIPMENT || ~ e< ~ |~ INETBAR ~ m mN~LOSUREAT |1 11 9 sqft -1. r.6 %1 -- -3 6 1.Cm 68-m Jr' 1.11 1 1 1 - - MECHANICAL r m 1/2.. 1 1 12'-1, 5 '72... 1 1 -0- %. STORAGE; . [1 1 - I E- '22!~ . 1 L~Â» --1,1)Â«-d P ' B I MASTER SUITE - 2 4 in B 'P a ./ I 1'-1 11 I 1.11 i, m 11 1, rrTITY 1 1111,1 - -J i r 0.- 140 r \ h 0 -w- 01 ~ mm}10 02- ~,0..0.- L -i l.... - ./ 11 -- [3 1 11 1 1.'lilli - 22.21'15' . 1&=51 ,--Im-----1 -1 1 S 1 111111'11 - 1, 11 lili 3 . T O 'L'B - 11~ 2,111 r -------il- - . = 1 r 1 I+ ~ ~ ' *3 BUTLER'S 4 - - (L=| \ 5- Ll- _ 111111 Ilk .0.- 4/ , 5-3 1/2* , : I 1 PANT<I k PEGI' . Ir 1 I h - lili 1111,1 / AL L DESIG< lr~AS *AANGF-/Tl; ANDPI AN. L -11-1.LLULL- 1 ~ ~ ,l ""Il"Il -1 -1. 1 oFFICE 7 - - H I ' INDICATED BY ~HESE DRAWINGS AND COP'fRGMT OF K,M RAYMOND ARCHITECTS IC SPECIFÂ¢CATIONS ARE .ME PROPERTY AID e . 1<41 h f WHATSOEVER WITHOUT WRITIEN PER-SS,ON .Au|+ OF A-,1426 i AN. 8-1 NE'HER BE USED C,4 ANY Oâ„¢El WORK : ' - 4 ~RIUSEDBYA~OTHERPERSONFO~ANVUSE WRITTEN DÂ»ENSIONS SHAU TAKE PRECEDENCE I. I .. -- 1,~. 1/4. ~ . 1 KIL Â·P I Z 1 - CÂ«01 Hnn OVER SCALED) D-ENSOIS AND SMALL BE VER,FED Â·rÂ· + AT T- SITE ANY /1-Nsa. DISCREPANCY , _ 511.1 - BAOUGMY TO â„¢E A.E.K. OF â„¢E 175 sqft ARCH,rECT -OR TO CO-ENCE,IEN, OF WORK I k "+1 [+1 ffi BEDROOM 4 ~ - - - h # DINING - 11 C LI LJ_ld ~ r - 4 KrCHEN r - I BA-HAND PONDER ~ 1 1 8-3/4- I Â·3 1 462 94 f. 711 0 Pfl--1 4 --- 9 C 6.essU~~~--1 - 45 ...0... I .. 1= e i AG.nu~,Inpl~Al, : K m I - O./. -~e~,â€¢.RAÂ·rE-&- 40 1.'0 ./.-= 1. 92 UVING I h BEDROOM 2 : 1 BEDROOM 3 L__-3 Â· 6 1 T -- 5 7, L ? 1 8' , i L 7 El L Ir. - 2 ' Re r-05%â€¢* - r ~ n rÂ«Â«7 ' 1 -1 01- 1 1 2 ..... q 2 54 ft 01 t (bu (* 3 1/. 22.-1 1/22 . 1/2.. 13-â€¢ 1/4 3 1/2 22 8 ~5 99/4 * I I , 44 44 LOWER LEVEL FAR- PROPOSED MAIN LEVEL FAR- PROPOSED UPPER LEVEL FAR- PROPOSED DATE ISSUE SCALE .1 16 z 9,Â·814 SCHEMA,IC SCALE 3/16 1.0 .( SCALE $ M 0 ./ IF>C SUBMITTAL MODERN CALCULATIONS LOAER LEVEL GROSS 21 -1 7 SF M 5 796)- 124 SF MAIN LEVEL GROSS 1318SF UPPER LEVEL GROSS 110 SF INTERIOR FAR 2212 SF Scale AS NOTED . MAIN LEVEL DECKS: 2/i/,9,9,Â£ FRONT PORCH 146 SF (EXEMPT) ir TIE ABOVE DIMENSION DIC NOT MEASURE ONE INCH <Â· BOK FORCH <4 22 SF (EXEMPT) ExACT. T~S CRâ€¢WING WILL HA. F 8EEN ENLARGED OR REDUCEE AVAL -ABE. FPSEA,FI UPPER LEVEL DECKS 162SF (EXEMPT) GARAGE 5 q 7 SF (-315 EXEMPTION) 222 SF Al.2 TOTAL PROPOSED FAR 2212+222- 2434 SF Pblled . 2315 ,m, ~.~ >~'lili VI'l" 1 Nhl3C]OIAI OBSOdOWd - SNOI1Vln01VO hIV=I â€¢,1~'Ity'J>~(Li)lilIM liel-110 E r <476 {)/6 1. eE'.4 9-9, 11.r--1' IAIV11VH M OES NOI1VAON3H NVIHO-DIA 133hI1S INÂ¥11Â¥H M 089 00 N3dSV . /1/4 12-/1/4 Th L 0. . Il I k r -h 5, I ......../LE*War. 1-Iill.Ir-il \ - 1/'lligill'll'll'll'll'll'llilimilt 6 0 U 1 4.. 3 3 ............../../"'?!213'll'll'lill'll' - \1,1.2 7, .; .r-, -71 I - I I 1 ..:i 1 16 1 I. k I k 4.1 , ....in 1 1-il . ~ k I~ = -0 I .1 1 12}-.51~ , , I-- 1 -t MIF,SI{1*5 -%-- me ~ 1.1!1211,Â·1.7,~ r.*Â·ok~'',94 0 ~ litild-7 -= 7 ' I I 1 .t .. 1. , ... :Ir~:,h 9 N j -- 0 - 6 0 :%:111Â§8Â§5#f grn:22 9 :.: 530 W HALLAM il"/*:~|/Il./ / I , ' -7-- , . 1, .. I.'i i 'i . 3~Mmll~ -- i, 124+5 046 I . Â» %00 VICTORIAN RENOVATION ..~~*m==Im=m g/= -- Mill'jilifit 0 â€¢ OVE: 9 80*9.59=:=4 AWII i F 530 W HALLAM STREET #:2*.:44% A U.2 5 m Ing.4 0 A--8=3.9 Â°.0/ 424 - ASPEN, CO uy#z~28â€¢- 11// -- 225*~0,21@14 K 1 1 701/1.al:.: STREETSCAPE tâ‚¬,1 9/() 925- 2252 ernall ki,-7101)krÂ·.al .li. 2."Mailâ€¢::i vvwvu lÂ·.â€ž11-4.ry'liâ€ž,in|Alâ‚¬ hit,u tÂ·'.â‚¬ rn,1 IK) Pallqd 0 0 IVIC. MEMORANDUM TO: Aspen Historic Preservation Commission FROM: Amy Simon, Historic Preservation Officer RE: 530 W. Hallam-Conceptual Major Development, On-Site Relocation, Historic Landmark Lot Split and Variances, PUBLIC HEARING DATE: January 28,2015 SUMMARY: 530 W. Hallam is a Victorian era home with 1970s and 1980s additions to the east and rear. The applicant proposes to demolish the non-historic additions to the house and move it towards the front and west. The lot is to be subdivided so that the open yard on the east side of the Victorian can be developed with a new home. A floor area bonus, setback variances, and Residential Design Standards variances are requested. APPLICANT: 530 Hallam, LLC, represented by Kim Raymond Architects. PARCEL ID: 2735-124-25-004. ADDRESS: 530 W. Hallam, Lots K, L, and M, Block 28, City and Townsite of Aspen, Colorado. ZONING: R-6. CONCEPTUAL MAJOR DEVELOPMENT The procedure for a Major Development Review, at the Conceptual level, is as follows. Staff reviews the submittal materials and prepares a report that analyzes the project's conformance with the design guidelines and other applicable Land Use Code Sections. This report is transmitted to the HPC with relevant information on the proposed project and a recommendation to continue, approve, disapprove or approve with conditions and the reasons for the recommendation. The HPC will review the application, the staff analysis report and the evidence presented at the hearing to determine the project's conformance with the City of Aspen Historic Preservation Design Guidelines. The HPC may approve, disapprove, approve with conditions, or continue the application to obtain additional information necessary to make a decision to approve or deny. HPC Review 1.28.2015 530 W. Hallani Page 1 of 13 P97 IV.C. Major Development is a two-step process requiring approval by the HPC of a Conceptual Development Plan, and then a Final Development Plan. Approval of a Conceptual Development Plan shall be binding upon HPC in regards to the location and form of the envelope of the structure(s) and/or addition(s) as depicted in the Conceptual Plan application including its height, scale, massing and proportions. No changes will be made to this aspect of the proposed development by the HPC as part of their review of the Final Development Plan unless agreed to by the applicant. Staff Response: Conceptual review focuses on the height, :. / 11 scale, massing and proportions of a proposal. A list of %~ Al-J -- the relevant HPC design guidelines is attached as "Exhibit '0 K ~ 6. M 11. j The property being reviewed by HPC is Lots K, L, and M, seen on the 1904 Sanborne map at right. The home that was located on Lot M was demolished at an unknown date. G 3 1, Ci The Victorian has been expanded in two directions; ts towards the alley and towards the east. The photo below 25~ ~ shows the original design, though in a deteriorated condition, in about the 1950s. The photo on the next page Â£4 22 .09 32 52 324 5 shows the home in 1980, followed by a current photo, illustrating how the house has become significantly hidden from view by large trees. "6:9,906'30~;94 v.':In' 1 Mil../.--1.Fi-104 :VA 14 % -'k7 7 - / 6.:71 4 h .,M Vt .4, 4,33444-4 t-----2 ''-fyi. 1-4 .: c: f.:97% 1- * . 1.-,r.;414.2;r-...4-2. --. PON '2Â·4Â».4 - ~;*5 ' I . VE..1.1.3. --,-221%Ef==~.. :219>i.. ; 1/'Â·i. . 4'23. . - 1 04 1 .- 0,9 - ilk' c. - 9, 6.~ 5 M -- - ~ 40Â·46. vâ€¢ , I k 9. - - I' ...1 Xy..: ... :*-'*Psi~,1-7*.r : r I I =dil/#WA + 1.?. ~; 4032'- . 3 0.,i -%4-Â·0~ji.Â·i :-~ M &.*~*241Â¢;-::.0(Â·333%Â·47 f . . irt L ':,1' HPC Review 1.28.2015 . 530 W. Hallam Page 2 0 f 13 P98 Al/Cal ===212/*Ae///)*--.*---/7 ..... -2 111 921 Â£ a. 1- ... 4 1,9 - ..4 - -1,2 - 4. 2: . *'r#i C<:41 . - .. -. f . 37 f t. 4 ' 4 1 ' 9 . 1, r:/40 - . Â£ f#.1 J -'.>A ' , 96 # . ,->.r 99 2 Â« ~ I ' : 7%3 U. . + 41 + * .,203% 1 3 4 . y':70 I. *A Â¥* I . ..9 . . 9- ..6 . .. -* f ' 1,;11*Â·.iy; ..2 951 4.76 .itz.K - I . '''I 6 *J. . , ..14 14, . .Â·, 4 ' - - :7:- ~ ' ~2~ ' . ' -1*.511+ . 72.' , *V~Â£ ''.fÂ· 0*64*~f~ 4 li,Wa , I . 110 Lif..A , ,..9 1 1. 4Â«f- : 4 -Â» /9 -Â·-,rf 45..2- rt,t U'.4/ , d ' - , f . 1 ..91* . e../.I , ~?lrki'-'4 , .. . A r e - . 4.. . r Â· A,- A. I. .~f'~. ~tc'.. '.rr... t,Â· 3 &'4 1,70,:~P.~ 847. 1 6â€¢. ~.,1 :'..1 - MAT#24Â·.4 L.41 ,-~e .,-' .. HPC Review 1.28.2015 530 W. Hallam Page 3 of 13 P99 IV.C. Overall, staff finds that the proposed project represents a successful preservation approach for this Victorian. Historic landmark lot splits have proven to be an effective way to reduce the size of additions to historic resources by transferring most of the square footage into a detached new building. With regard to the work proposed on the Victorian, staff recommends that some additional restoration actions be taken, which will be described under the f[oor area bonus criteria. The historic photo shown on the previous page was not available when the application was initially prepared. In terms of the addition to the Victorian, staff finds that guidelines 10.6 and 10.9 are not adequately met at this time. The two story portion of the proposed addition is distanced from the Victorian by a generous (20') long connecting link, however a roof extension over a staircase diminishes the separation and should be restudied to decrease the visual impact. This roof form does screen some of the activity of a deck that sits behind (east) of it. Staff recommends a restudy of the pair of dormers on the south faga(le of the addition. In elevation, that area o f the roof appears complex behind the Victorian, and the dormers are located lower on the roof plane than one on the north facing roof, somewhat out of character with the simple profile of the Victorian. The applicant is electing to remove some of the existing upper floor living space in the Victorian, thereby moving that square footage into new mass on the site. This could be problematic, but staff does not find that the Victorian is being overwhelmed with the size of the addition to be built behind it. The upper floor plate height in this historic house is quite low, making the livability of second floor space limited, without altering the house with new dormers. A dimension line shown on the new rear addition suggests that it might be over the 25' height limit, measured to a specific point on the rake of the roof. The architect must confirm that the height limit is met. The proposed new house must draw references from the Victorian, but not copy it. Staff has a few scale and form concerns per guideline 11.4, related only to the front portion of the new house. There is no upper floor living space in the front form, however the plate height equals the Victorian and the roof ridge is higher than the historic building. The gable end is also wider than the Victorian. The gable has a deeper eave on the front than other areas of the project. The porch on the new house projects out from the fag(le, rather than being inset like the Victorian. Staff recommends some of these elements be more closely tied to the characteristics of the Victorian to create better compatibility between the buildings. In terms of site plan, staff finds that the proposal is generally appropriate. The Victorian is on a slightly smaller lot than the new house,- with less floor area assigned to it, which is HPC Review 1.28.2015 530 W. Hallam Page 4 of 13 P100 0 0 the goal of the lot split. Setback requirements are met (except at the rear of the basement, to be addressed below.) The required parking is provided on the site. There are very substantial trees along the south edge of the site. One, directly in front of the new house, is very large even in the 1980 photo on the previous page. Others may be more recent plantings. The applicant represents that the street trees will be preserved, however the new house is within the dripline of the oldest tree. The applicant has not consulted with the City Forester to make sure that the positioning of the houses in this plan is allowable, nor has the Forester assessed whether the trees are all healthy. Staff has concerns with the impact of the trees on the public visibility of the historic resource. Consultation with the Forester is necessary. Combined with minor design restudies mentioned in this memo, staff recommends the application be continued. FLOOR AREA BONUS In selected circumstances, the HPC may grant up to five hundred (500) additional square feet of allowable floor area for projects involving designated historic properties. To be considered for the bonus, it must be demonstrated that: a. The design of the project meets all applicable design guidelines; b. The historic building is the key element of the property and the addition is incorporated in a manner that maintains the visual integrity of the historic building; c. The work restores the existing portion of the building to its historic appearance; d. The new construction is reflective of the proportional patterns found iii the historic building's form, materials or openings; e. The construction materials are of the highest quality; f. An appropriate transition defines the old and new portions o f the building; g. The project retains a historic outbuilding; and/or h. Notable historic site and landscape features are retained. Staff Response: Staff finds that this project is appropriate for a floor area bonus because of the benefits of the lot split. Staff does recommend that the elevations of the Victorian be amended to clarify the following restoration work that is currently not represented, but can be seen in the historic photo: roof the Victorian with wood shingles, reconstruct the chimney to the original design, re-use the existing foundation stones as a veneer and ensure the new stone foundation matches the height and character of the existing, reconstruct a missing original double hung window on the ground floor of the south faga(le, and match the porch trim to what can be seen in the photo. The calculations provided in the application indicate a floor area bonus of approximately 450 square feet is needed. HPC Review 1.28.2015 530 W. Hallam Page 5 0 f 13 P101 IV.C. SETBACK VARIANCES In granting a variance, the HPC must make a finding that such a variance: a. Is similar to the pattern, features and character of the historic property or district; and/or b. Enhances or mitigates an adverse impact to the historic significance or architectural character of the historic property, an adjoining designated historic property or historic district. Sta ff Response: The proj ect meets all setback variances, except that the basement requires a 10', not a 5' setback as drawn. This has no effect that is seen by the public. Staff supports the variance as a preservation incentive if it is desired by the applicant. ON-SITE RELOCATION 26.415.090.C. Standards for the relocation of designated properties. Relocation for a building, structure or object will be approved if it is determined that it meets any one of the following standards: 1. It is considered a noncontributing element of a historic district and its relocation will not affect the character of the historic district; or 2. It does not contribute to the overall character of the historic district or parcel on which it is located and its relocation will not have an adverse impact on the Historic District or property; or 3. The owner has obtained a certificate of economic hardship; or 4. The relocation activity is demonstrated to be an acceptable preservation method given the character and integrity of the building, structure or object and its move will not adversely affect the integrity of the Historic District in which it was originally located or diminish the historic, architectural or aesthetic relationships of adjacent designated properties; and Additionally, for approval to relocate all of the following criteria must be met: 1. It has been determined that the building, structure or object is capable of withstanding the physical impacts of relocation; 2. An appropriate receiving site has been identified; and HPC Review 1.28.2015 530 W. Hallam Page 6 of 13 P102 3. An acceptable plan has been submitted providing for the safe relocation, repair and preservation of the building, structure or object including the provision of the necessary financial security. Staff Response: Staff finds that the forward and westward relocation of the house meets Criterion 4 above, in that the move helps to distance the historic resource from the new construction. The move is not insignificant as the house will be placed 15' in front of the location and 6' west. The only other historic resource on this blockface is at the opposite end of the block. It is a miner's cottage that has not been moved and is about 10' back from the front lot line. As part of a building permit review, the applicant will be required to submit the standard assurances that relocation will proceed with care. HISTORIC LANDMARK LoT SPLIT The split of a lot that is a designated Historic Landmark for the purpose of creating one additional development parcel shall be approved, approved with conditions, or denied by the City Council, pursuant to Section 26.480.030 - Procedures for Review, after a recommendation is provided by the Historic Preservation Commission pursuant to Section 26.415.110(A) Historic Landmark Lot Split, and according to the following standards: 1. The request complies with the requirements of Section 26.480.040, General Subdivision Review Standards. A. Guaranteed Access to a Public Way. All subdivided lots must have perpetual unobstructed legal vehicular access to a public way. A proposed subdivision shall not eliminate or obstruct legal vehicular access from a public way to an adjacent property. All streets in a Subdivision retained under private ownership shall be dedicated to public use to ensure adequate public and emergency access. Security/privacy gates across access points and driveways are prohibited. B. Alignment with Original Townsite Plat. The proposed lot lines shall approximate, to the extent practical, the platting of the Original Aspen Townsite, and additions thereto, as applicable to the subject land. Minor deviations from the original platting lines to accommodate significant features of the site may be approved. C. Zoning Conformance. All new lots shall conform to the requirements of the zone district in which the property is situated, including variations and variances approved pursuant to this Title. A single lot shall not be located in more than one zone district unless unique circumstances dictate. A rezoning application may be considered concurrently with subdivisionreview. HPC Review 1.28.2015 530 W. Hallam Page 7 0 f 13 P103 IV.C. D. Existing Structures, Uses, and Non-Conformities. A subdivision shall not create or increase the non-conformity of a use, structure or parcel. A rezoning application or other mechanism to correct the non-conforming nature of a use, structure, or parcel may be considered concurrently. In the case where an existing structure or use occupies a site eligible for subdivision, the structure need not be demolished and the use need not be discontinued prior to application for subdivision. If approval o f a subdivision creates a non-conforming structure or use, including a structure spanning a parcel boundary, such structure or use may continue until recordation of the subdivision plat. Alternatively, the City may accept certain assurance that the non-conformities will be remedied after recordation of the subdivision plat. Such assurances shall be reflected in a development agreement or other legal mechanism acceptable to the City Attorney and may be time-bound or secured with a financial surety. Staff Response: The application, to split the lot into one 4,200 square foot lot, containing a relocated Victorian home, and one 4,800 square foot lot, containing a new home, meets the criteria above. 2. The fathering parcel is listed in the Inventory of Historic Sites and Structures. Staff Response: The parcel is listed on the Inventory of Historic Sites and Structures. 3. No more than two lots are created by the Historic Landmark Lot Split. No more than one historic landmark lot split shall occur on any one fathering parcel. Staff Response: Two lots are created. 4. In residential zone districts, the allowable Floor Area for each new residential lot shall be established by allocating the total allowable Floor Area of the fathering parcel to each of the new lots such that no overall increase in Floor Area is achieved and no individual lot allows a Floor Area in excess of that allowed a similarly-sized lot in the same zone district. An equal distribution is not required. The allowable Floor Area for each new lot shall be noted on the Historic Lot Split Plat. Any Floor Area bonus already granted by the Historic Preservation Commission shall be allocated to each individual parcel and shall also be noted on the plat as a square footage bonus. If the properties remain eligible for a Floor Area bonus from the Historic Preservation Commission, the plat and subdivision agreement shall specify the manner in which this potential bonus shall be allocated to the two properties if received. In non-residential zones districts, the Floor Area shall be calculated according to the limitations of the zone district applied to each new lot as permitted for the use. HPC Review 1.28.2015 530 W. Hallam Page 8 of 13 P104 IV.C. The total Floor Area shall not be stated on the plat because the floor area will be determined by the use established on each parcel. Staff Response: The allowable floor area on the fathering (existing) parcel is 4,080 square feet. The applicant proposes to split that, plus a requested approximately 450 square foot floor area bonus, between the Victorian home (2,075 square feet of floor area) and the new home (2,441 square feet of floor area). 5. The Historic Lot Split Plat shall be reviewed and recorded in the office of the Pitkin County Clerk and Recorder, pursuant to Chapter 26.490 - Approval Documents. No subdivision agreement need be prepared or entered into between the applicant and the City unless the Community Development Director determines such an agreement is necessary. Staff Response: The plat will be filed subsequent to historic landmark lot split approval by City Council. RESIDENTIAL DESIGN STANDARDS The project does not comply with the Secondary Mass design standard on the new home. The link between the primary and secondary mass is 15'3" wide. The maximum is 10.' The existing single-family home (the Victorian) is exempt since it is not new. The standard says: Secondary mass. All new single-family and duplex structures shall locate at least ten percent (10%) of their total square footage above grade in a mass which is completely detached from the principal building or linked to it by a subordinate linking element. This standard shall only apply to parcels within the Aspen infill area pursuant to Subsection 26.410.010.B.2. Accessory buildings such as garages, sheds and accessory dwelling units are examples of appropriate uses for the secondary mass. A subordinate linking element for the purposes of linking a primary and secondary mass shall be at least ten (10) feet in length, not more than ten (10) feet in width, and with a plate height of not more than nine (9) feet. Accessible outdoor space over the linking element (e.g. a deck) is permitted but may not be covered or enclosed. Any railing for an accessible outdoor space over a linking element must be the minimum reasonably necessary to provide adequate safety and building code compliance and the railing must be 50% or more transparent. The project does not comply with the Building Element standard on the Victorian, which says: HPC Review 1.28.2015 530 W. Hallain Page 9 of 13 P105 IV.C. A covered entry porch of fifty (50) or more square feet, with a minimum depth of six (6') feet, shall be part of the front facade. Entry porches and canopies shall not be more than one (1) story in height. The project does not meet the Build-to-line standard, which requires 60% of the front fagade of both buildings to be within 5' of the front setback line. In order to grant variances, HPC must find that the proposal will: a) Provide an appropriate design or pattern of development considering the context in which the development is proposed and purpose of the particular standard. In evaluating the context as it is used in the criteria, the reviewing board may consider the relationship of the proposed development with adjacent structures, the immediate neighborhood setting, or a broader vicinity as the board feels is necessary to determine if the exception is warranted; or, b) Be clearly necessary for reasons of fairness related to unusual site-specific constraints. Staff Response: Staff recommends the variances be granted. Secondary Mass Staff accepts the applicant's argument that the lot with the new home is constrained by the large tree at the front of the site. The project needs to push back to avoid damaging the tree, therefore providing a detached Secondary Mass, or a narrow linking element, is less feasible than in other circumstances. Building Elements The feature that does not comply, the front porch on the Victorian, is a historic feature that should not be altered from the original design. Build-to line The Victorian has an irregular footprint at the front and cannot be redesigned to meet this standard. The new home cannot be moved further forward on the site because of trees. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends HPC continue the project in order to restudy the design issues described in the memo and to consult with the City Forester. EXHIBITS: Exhibit A: Design Guidelines Exhibit B: Application HPC Review 1.28.2015 530 W. Hallam Page 10 0 f 13 P106 IV.C. Exhibit A: Relevant HPC Design Guidelines for 530 W. Hallam, Conceptual review For the Victorian 9.1 Proposals to relocate a building will be considered on a case-by-case basis. In general, relocation has less of an impact on individual landmark structures than those in a historic district. It must be demonstrated that relocation is the best preservation alternative. Rehabilitation of a historic building must occur as a first phase of any improvements. A relocated building must be carefully rehabilitated to retain original architectural details and materials. o Before a building is moved, a plan must be in place to secure the structure and provide a new foundation, utilities, and to restore the house. u The design of a new structure on the site should be in accordance with the guidelines for new construction. o In general, moving a building to an entirely different site or neighborhood is not approved. 4 Site the structure in a position similar to its historic orientation. It should face the same direction and have a relatively similar setback. It may not, for example, be moved to the rear of the parcel to accommodate a new building in front of it. 9.6 When rebuilding a foundation, locate the structure at its approximate historic elevation above grade. o Raising the building slightly above its original elevation is acceptable. However, lifting it substantially above the ground level is inappropriate. u Changing the historic elevation is discouraged, unless it can be demonstrated that it enhances the resource. 9.7 A lightwell may be used to permit light into below-grade living space. Iii general, a lightwell is prohibited on a wall that faces a street (per the Residential Design Standards). The size of a lightwell should be minimized. A lightwell that is used as a walkout space may be used only in limited situations and will be considered on a case-by-case basis. If a walkout space is feasible, it should be surrounded by a simple fence or rail. 10.2 A more recent addition that is not historically significant may be removed. 10.3 Design a new addition such that one's ability to interpret the historic character of the primary building is maintained. o A new addition that creates an appearance inconsistent with the historic character of the primary building is inappropriate. o An addition that seeks to imply an earlier period than that of the primary building also is inappropriate. HPC Review 1.28.2015 530 W. Hallam Page 11 of 13 P107 LE C 0 0 9 000 0 IV.C. o An addition that seeks to imply an inaccurate variation of the primary building's historic style should be avoided. o An addition that covers historically significant features is inappropriate. 10.4 Design a new addition to be recognized as a product of its own time. u All addition should be made distinguishable from the historic building, while also remaining visually compatible with these earlier features. o A change in setbacks of the addition from the historic building, a subtle change in material or a differentiation between historic, and more current styles are all techniques that may be considered to help define a change from old to new construction. 10.6 Design an addition to be compatible in size and scale with the main building. o An addition that is lower than or similar to the height of the primary building is preferred. 10.7 If it is necessary to design an addition that is taller than a historic building, set it back substantially from significant facades and use a "connectbr" to link it to the historic building. u A 1 -story connector is preferred. u The connector should be a minimum of 10 feet long between the addition and the primary building. u The connector also should be proportional to the primary building. 10.8 Place an addition at the rear of a building or set it back from the front to minimize the visual impact on the historic structure and to allow the original proportions and character to remain prominent. u Locating an addition at the front of a structure is inappropriate. u Additional floor area may also be located under the building in a basement which will not alter the exterior mass of a building. o Set back an addition from primary facades in order to allow the original proportions and character to remain prominent. A minimum setback of 10 feet on primary structures is recommended. 10.9 Roof forms should be similar to those of the historic buildino. b Typically, gable, hip and shed roofs are appropriate. Flat roofs are generally inappropriate for additions on residential structures with sloped roofs. 10.10 Design an addition to a historic structure such that it will not destroy or obscure historically important architectural features. o For example, loss or alteration of architectural details, comices and eavelines should be avoided. HPC Review 1.28.2015 530 W. Hallam Page 12 0 f 13 P108 U 0 0 0 For the New House: Building Orientation 11.1 Orient the primary entrance of a new building to the street. u The building should be arranged parallel to the lot lines, maintaining the traditional grid pattern ofthe site. 11.2 In a residential context, clearly define the primary entrance to a new building by using a front porch. The front porch should be "functional," in that it is used as a means of access to the entry. A new porch should be similar in size and shape to those seen traditionally. In some cases, the front door itself may be positioned perpendicular to the street; nonetheless, the entry should still be clearly defined with a walkway and porch that orients to the street. 11.3 Construct a new building to appear similar in scale with the historic buildings on the parcel. u Subdivide larger masses into smaller "modules" that are similar in size to the historic buildings on the original site. 11.4 Design a front elevation to be similar in scale to the historic building. The primary plane of the front should not appear taller than the historic structure. The front should include a one-story element, such as a porch. 11.5 Use building forms that are similar to those of the historic properly. u They should not overwhelm the original in scale. 11.6 Use roof forms that are similar to those seen traditionally in the block. Sloping roofs such as gable and hip roofs are appropriate for primary roo f forms. Flat roofs should be used only in areas where it is appropriate to the context. On a residential structure, eave depths should be similar to those seen traditionally in the context. o Exotic building and roof forms that would detract from the visual continuity of the street are discouraged. These include geodesic domes and A-frames. 11.10 The imitation of older historic styles is discouraged. This blurs the distinction between old and new buildings. Highly complex and ornately detailed revival styles that were not a part of Aspen's history are especially discouraged on historic sites. HPC Review 1.28.2015 530 W. Hallam Page 13 0 f 13 P109 00 000 00 LE C IV.C. *50 Â·2244. At\-ec, ATTACHMENT 2 -LAND USE APPLICATION PROJECT: Natne: 936 UALLA-wn i LL.(L - Â¢F,-46VAÂ·12817 ~41' 59(.1Â« 0/ Location: 5 -30 W 14 Â£A LLAM? A-6'~f-t'Â·.~ naj 12â‚¬5 j pitncE (Indicate street address, lot & btock nuoiben legal description where appropriate) Parcel ID # (REQUIRED) 2-1159 - /.24-,479- 006.I APPLICANT: Name: 5-030 14Al-64,11, LLA Â£ -14412,6 191 EPL,4 n lp, ppla 7- Address: 0/33 71269'PreTAT?- 4'tArdÂ¢ w.Ms-TEY) 97* U Phone #: 910 -11 8 0 REPRESENTATIVE: Name: 1.6 *1 12/4,+91.0 ne /4126-Al-TE el- 9, h.1 0 Address: o I '33 9>06520(51&Â¥-- Su l-11Â£- 41 01 y ; 43 7Â£F-7 Phone #: 0 24 - 7-24 2- TYPE OF APPLICATION: (please check all that apply): [3 GMQS Exemption El Conceptual PUD [3 Temporary Use U GMQS Allotment [I] Final PUD (& PUD Amendment) Â¤ Text/Map Amendment O Special Review U Subdivision El Conceptual SPA [3 ESA - 8040 Greenline, Stream [3 Subdivision Exemption (includes Â¤ Final SPA (& SPA Margin, Hallam Lake Bluff, condominiumization) Amendment) Mountain View Plane O Commercial Design Review [@' Lot Split,/W, 5-topt C' U Small Lodge Conversion/ Expansion @~ Residential Design Variance gl Lot Line Adjustment W Other: R"ec- [3 Conditional Use EXISTING CONDITIONS: (description ofexisting buildings, uses, pivvious approvals, etc.) 4!,0~8 Â£-Â£ FAMILy 141512Â¥,c. 12-19,7/Â£'F' Ot ki/ Plilt'741-fiLLS *99,130;*5 01\1 A LA,vt,ovviA#16 7(l-444 Y r,itp. 0-1- 19 7,3 PROPOSAL: (description ofproposed buildings, uses, modifications, etc.) U,*(51/A-*17Â£- 4/51kf:) C SÂ«fLUCrli~i '225~17 12-020 4Â¢CIZM 7- 41)911-/ons, Plt;6â€¢u'/ZÂ· ld'370,010 114#4 -440,4,0,1 2 REA* / 661- 6961'F f }l itosipt.al-0. filp,116./ 1,6-Pyl 6. Have you attached the following? / FEES DUE: $__ 11 14 - 8 Pre-Application Conference Summary E[ Attachment #1, Signed Fee Agreement ~~' Response to Attachment #3, Dimensional Requirements Form Response to Attachment #4, Submittal Requirenients- Including Written Responses to Review Standards [~ 3-D Model for large project All plans thatarelarger than 8.5" X ll"must be folded. A disk with an electric copy ofallwritten text OVIierosoft Word Format) must be submitted as pait of the application. Large scale projects should indude an elâ‚¬etronic 3-D model. Your pre-application conference summary will indicate if you must submit a 3-D model. P110 *50Â· 2Â©lit - 14Â® ATTACHMENT 2-LAND USE APPLICATION PROJECT: Name: 538 UALLA-wn t LL(L - *26VA-'178 77 /41'.S'Ft.11-- / Location: 510 0 14aLLAw7 A Â«fl\\ n;Ek) 12Â¥55 117'nit (Indicate street address, lot & bfock nuoiber, legal description where appropriate) Parcel ID # (REQUIRED) 2-7:93 - 1.24.25-664 APPLICANT: Name: 9030 14-Al--CAL,1, l-Le_ 6 -1&#Ave Fyiept,4 r} 9, Fway_ Address: 0 1 33 '2126 S'FECTE 'jl 4214 Â¢- L A S-TE )9 â‚¬74' 4 Phone #: 910 - 11 A o REPRESENTATIVE: Name: 1.Gn 1ZAÂ«Flon U AfZCM)-1Â¥01-9, 1,0 Address: 0 133 r-20 65*eclk- Sull-E- 410-Zy ; 437Â£,7 Phone #: 8 2â‚¬ - 7.26- 2- TYPE OF APPLICATION: (please check all that apply): GMQS Exemption Â£ Conceptual PUD U Temporary Use GMQS Allotment U Final PUD (& PUD Amendment) D Text/Map Amendment Special Review U Subdivision D Conceptual SPA ESA - 8040 Greenline, Stream U Subdivision Exemption (includes D Final SPA (& SPA Margin, Hallam Lake Bluff, condominiumization) Amendment) Mountain View Plane U Commercial Design Review INF Lot Split ~,41151-6*1 C Â£ Small Lodge Conversion/ Expansion E~ Residential Design Variance E Lot Line Adjustment Â¥ Other: EFC- ~ Conditional Use EXISTING CONDITIONS: (description of existing buildings, uses, previous approvals, etc.) StALÂ£ f*.11Â£-9 14!572,0.0 1*51 0%41(Â£ ~1/ Mi, p,74'US *19/190.Fl, 5 od A LA no *IM-10 70.44-f y r~*p. 7- l9 7-51 PROPOSAL: (description of proposed buildings, uses, modifications, etc.) Umn/*le- 4/5-lkfic, SÂ«flue--riA CE-~172-J,no RECLM'l- 4,PP/1-,ans, nÂ®ve WISTOW'C- U,â€¢4 -Av,5/ i 4,6,Â·, e RE#10/l-6 -1- 69(-4-1- /' n ttoâ‚¬Ip,-al-0- f94.pic.q 1,6-p,16 Have you attached the following? FEESDUE: $ 1 Â£14 - 8 Pre-Application Conference Summary 0 Attachment #1, Signed Fee Agreement g - Response to Attachment #3, Dimensional Requirements Form 8f Response to Attachment #4, Submittal Requirements- Including Written Responses to Review Standards 3-D Model for large project All plans that are larger than 8.5" X 11" must be fol(led. A disk with an electric copy of all written text (Microsoft Word Format) must be submitted as part of the application. Large scale projects should include an electronic 3-D model. Your pre-application conference summary will indicate ifyou must submit a 3-D model. UDED .. ATTACHMENT 3 DIMENSIONAL REQUIREMENTS FORM Project: kÂ¢FlovA-nE- 1,-hS-To(tic- 14*M ti- /Ls'fls'Pr!-r 4;,â‚¬.1.1 14-ouie- Applicant: 9 6 6 14 4 LL 4- wl , L Le- Location: 930 14/ALLA+rt Â£ As r'Â£41 Zone District: O - 62 Lot Size: 900 0 Lot Area: 9000 (for the purposes of calculating Floor Area, Lot Area may be reduced for areas within the high water mark, easements, and steep slopes. Please refer to the definition of Lot Area in the Municipal Code.) Commercial net leasable: * ~~Existing: Proposed: Number o f residential units: Existing: Proposed: 'L Number of bedrooms: Existing: 1 Proposed: VI C-ro,2-14.,1 ~ '~ 4 Proposed % of demolition (Historic properties only): -7 7.9 70 ALL '1-*PrT 15 Yls Pl -At 5-1-Gfi c G td -7-W,2.Â·Bu ILD'4. 2516fAL DIMENSIONS: 1, cr. 2 *to'PIE#*1 769Â£ Floor Area: Existing.- Allowable: Proposed: Principal bldg. height: Existing: 3113Â¥~Allowable: 49 LO Proposed: 311 35/~ a 41. Co Access. bldg. height: Existing: J 1 ,/4 Allowable: proposed: 71 (A On-Site parking: Existing: .FA- Required: 2~ proposed: 1 2 % Site coverage: Existing: Required:___j~_Ci~Â¢46~roposed: % Open Space: Existing: Required. Â¥10 KEQKProposed: Front Setback: Existing: 226-9 Required: 1.0 Proposed- J S LI 0 1 4 L 1 Q S Lu 6aic,9-2 â‚¬L 2" 9 L 11 4WnsÂ· Rear Setback: Existing: 1 ~' ?) Required: ln'-G Lly,p~roposed: 1 1 49' 11'-1.J l.-llv-,41 Combined F/R: Existing: Requked: h lA Proposedz -_ b u-} Side SÂ©tback: Existing: 101-0 Required: 43[0 Proposed: Er; 6'/4 -11_6'74 â‚¬ SideSÂ©tback: Existing: 912 Required: 51-0 Proposed. EllilÂ»1*41.41/4" CorrhmedSides: Existing: a,9- 2 Required: l D'-0 Proposed: ~ 4.15 \ 12\- idli //10 Distance Between Existing /2 ~04 Requiri_-!: Proposed: _____ Buildings c>U Â£ SUILE>InG, obl E.Acl4 L.01- Existing non-conformities or encroachments: y A A h f- Variations requested: 11.C> 14 rk ,;F Yl 5 1 6, ,AL VA<Â£44.- i ,=1Â£,1 0Â¥KE. KE WA Â¢Â£ 6-YfED. .. October 14, 2014 Sara Adams City of Aspen Community Development Department 130 S Galena Street, 3rd Floor Aspen, CO 81611 RE: 530 W Hallam Ave Summary Letter Aspen, Colorado Parcel ID: 273512425004 Dear Sara, Thank you for your time and knowledge regarding this property and the process required to renovate the historic structure and to do the lot split for a new residence. The following information will address the Sections of the Land Use Application Manual and the Land Use Code as outlined in your letter from the pre-application conference summary dated 8.26.14. This property is located in the R-6, Medium density, residential zone district. 1. . ,4 t. I 44 I I 9. /6--_ .t~ 1 4 at --2,5 1 . . m. I ... 14 802 E. Cooper Avenue, Suite 4 I Aspen, Colorado I 81611 I 970.925.2252 .. RELEVANT LAND USE CODE SECTIONS SECTION 26.304 - Application 1. Please see attached letter of authorization from 530 Hallam, LLC, a Colorado limited liability corporation, granting Kim Raymond Architects, Inc authority to act on their behalf throughout this process. 2. Please see the attached Vicinity Map with a legal description and directions to the property. 3. Attached, please find the Disclosure of Ownership in the form of the Title Insurance conveying the property to 530 Hallam, LLC. 4. See number 2 above. 5. Please see attached Site Plan depicting the proposed changes to the existing landscape and building footprint; including the lot split. 6. Please see the site improvement survey of the property located at 530 W Hallam. 7. Please see below, the description and summary of all requested information pertaining to the Land Use Code sections in regard to the proposed development. Additionally, please find a copy of the Pre-application Conference Summary sheet, attached at the end of this packet of information. This application package includes all requested documents as outlined in the pre-application conference summary dated August 26, 2014. Section 26.410 - Residential Design Standards Section 26.410.10 - Applicability 26.410.010 General A. The purpose of these standards is to preserve established neighborhood scale and character, while not determining architectural style. The intention of the development of this historic property is to renovate the existing home to it's original style, extend the one story addition towards the back of the lot and create a second dwelling as a duplex at the rear of the lot with garages facing the alley. Reviewing the history of this building and using the Sanborn & Sons Mapping of 1904, the two story Victorian was situated on the center of two of the three city lots which currently make up this parcel; Lots K and L. In 1904, Lot M had another small home. Both homes had small outbuildings on the alley. At some point the small building on Lot M was demolished (or disappeared in some other fashion) both small out buildings have been removed. Throughout the years to follow, the home was added onto in several phases. The original stone foundation can still be seen on the west side of the building. Comparing the Sanborn & Sons Map to the current home, a section of the home that was in existence in 1904 was removed and a newer, larger addition was put on the house. The footprint on the Sanborn & Sons Map shows the back part of the house jogging in on the east and west about 2'-0 before the walls were built to the north. 802 E. Cooper Avenue, Suite 4 I Aspen, Colorado I 81611 I 970.925.2252 .. Since this section of the original home has already been removed and we have no documentation of it beyond the footprint, we are restoring and renovating the section of the home that we can distinguish from the original foundation. All the other additions will be removed and we will use photos and family history to help us bring this building back to it's original appearance. We are working around the very large spruce/pine trees located on the lot; which dictate where we can relocate the existing home and how far back we need to build the new structure to not damage the trees along Hallam Street; thus we will be incorporating the garages into the buildings, as we do not have the physical space to make them detached structures. Both garages will be accessed from the alley. B.2 The proposed development will be two single family residences and are within the Aspen infill area; thus all the residential design standards shall apply. C. We are seeking a development order from the HPC showing that the Residential Design Standards have been met for the restoration of the historic home and for the home on the newly created lot. City Council will review the historic lot split. 26.410.020 Procedures for Review A. A pre-application conference was held between Amy Simon and Kim Raymond regarding this project. This letter addresses the issues outlined in the letter sent by Sara Adams dated August 26, 2014. D. Please see Section 26.410.40 for the details of the specific design standard variances that will be requested of the HPC and City Council for the completion of this project. There are no dimensional variances being sought. The variances being sought are a subordinate link that is more than 10'-0 wide on each house and the new house will not be able to have 60% of the front fagade within 15'-0" of the front property line. 26.410.040 Residential Design Standards A. Site design 1. The existing house is located on a corner parcel of a city block comprised of three original City blocks. The front fa,ade of the existing structure will remain parallel to the street. It is currently 26'-9" from the property line and straddles the two westerly lots of the parcel. The house is set much further back than the other houses on the street. The additions to the historic building have expanded to include Lot M, the more easterly lot in the front, and stretched back to 14'-8" of the rear property line, on all three lots. We are proposing moving the existing historic house (minus all the additions) forward 12'-1" to have a front yard setback of 13'-0"; and moving it to the west 6'-5" to within 9'-5" of the west property line. This places the historic building more in the center of the new lot that will be created for it after the proposed lot split. We are being conscientious to keep the construction out of the drip lines of the trees along 6th St. The new home on the newly created lot to the east will be set back 14'-10" from the front property line, starting construction back as far as possible to work around the 802 E. Cooper Avenue, Suite 4 1 Aspen, Colorado 1 81611 1 970.925.2252 .. existing spruce trees. This home will also be close to centered on it's lot and the front fa,ade will be parallel to the street. 2. The proposed moving of the Victorian home will place the front fa,ade of the building 3'-0" from the front yard setback line; well within the required 5'-0 of the front yard setback; bringing it into compliance with this more modern standard with 63% of the front fa,ade, not including the porch. The porch roof puts the entire front fa,ade within this 5'-0" range from the front setback. As for being on a corner lot, this frontage dimension applies to the west side of the Victorian as well. 58% of the west fa,ade is within five feet of the 5'-0" side yard setback line. Due to the shape of the existing Victorian that cannot change, and the fact that we are working to save the evergreen trees on 6th Street, we are just 2% shy of meeting this criteria of 60% frontage being within 5'-0" of the side yard set back. We are asking for a variance for this 2%. The front porch of the new home is 4'-10" from the front yard setback line, meeting this standard in dimension from the property line; but the porch is not 60% of the front fa,ade, only 43.6%. We have pushed the building back as far as possible to save the large spruce tree in the front yard. The front fa,ade is setback the 6'-0 depth of the front porch, and still this tree will have to be trimmed at the edge. We are asking for a variance for this 11.4% that we are short. 3. There are no proposed fences, hedgerows or berms for the project. B.1. Building Form 1. Secondary Mass; The Victorian and the new, Modern home both have a secondary mass beyond the required 10% minimum of the total floor area behind the subordinate link. The appropriate use for this secondary mass is a garage, which both homes have in the secondary mass. 2. Subordinate linking element: The Victorian and the Modern home both have a a subordinate link which have a plate of 9'-0; are a minimum 10'-0" in length, and both links will have some portion of them used as decks; which will have glass railings, 100% transparent. Please see plans and elevations. The link on the Victorian is 17'-6" wide; and the link at the Modern home is 15'-3". We are asking for a variance from the 10'-0 width aspect of this design standard. The link at the Victorian is set 5'-0" back from the west rear corner of the renovated original home and 2'-10 M" from the east rear corner to make a very obvious distinction between the old and new construction and make the back corners of the historic building visible. We will be re-creating these back corners as part of our renovation, as both were removed during some previous remodels. The link on the Modern home is set back from the front portion of the building 9'-5" 802 E. Cooper Avenue, Suite 4 I Aspen, Colorado I 81611 I 970.925.2252 .. on the west and 5'-3"on the east to make a distinct, subordinate element in the building. The houses are both pushed back from the front yard because of the large trees that we are striving to save during this construction, so we need a bit more space in the link; thus the request for the link to exceed the 10'-0 width. C. Parking, garages and carpons 1. This property does have an alley and both of the double stall garage doors are accessed directly from the alley. D. Building Elements 1. Street Oriented entrance and principal window. The property sits on a corner lot with the historic house facing Hallam Street as it was built originally. This historic building has a front door at the entry porch, which is less than 10' back from the front facade. The Modern residence, on the proposed lot, has a front door, and primary windows that also face Hallam and on the front fa,ade. Dl.a The entry doors on both homes are in the front fa,ade of their respective buildings, facing Hallam and are no more than 8'-0 tall. Dl.b Front porches: Both units have covered, front porches that are one story. The historic home, after the renovation to bring it back to it's original appearance, will have a porch that is 5'-3" deep and be 42 sq. ft; doesn't quite meet the 6'-0 depth requirement, but is historic. The front porch on the Modern home will have a 6'-0 deep porch that is 93 sq ft. Dl.c The Victorian home has a historic windows in a "bay" shaped element at the front fa,ade, next to the entry porch; which is the principal window. The Modern home has a combination of large windows that are the principle windows. D2. One Story Element: The historic building meets this standard, when renovated back to it's original condition as mentioned above. The porch is 36% of the front fagade. The historic roof starts as one story, but continues to slope up to the second story. The part of the porch under the short roof will be removed as it is part of the non-historic addition that will be removed before the house is relocated. Â§6'Jâ€ž 21 1 01 -2~t"~ . A ...tzl'.AL. %4 7 0 , 7/4 7 -T- 9 802 E. Cooper Avenue, Suite 4 I Aspen, Colorado I 81611 I 970.925.2252 .. The Modern home has a one story element in the form of the front porch that is 6'-0 deep and is 44% of the front fa,ade. D3.a Street facing windows shall not span between 9-12' above the main floor or where a floor may typically be located. There are no windows in this "no window zone"in either of the homes on the property. D3.b There are no non-orthogonal appearing windows in either of the buildings. D4. All the light wells, for both units, are located behind the front fagades of the each of the respective buildings. E. Context 1. Materials. El.a All of the existing materials on the historic house will be cleaned up and repaired as necessary to maintain the historic character of the existing building; the materials on the new portion of this home will be the same color palette with similar scale materials to blend, but be differentiated from the historic. The proposed new materials on the modern home will flow around the building in a consistent manner, with very few materials or color changes. El.b The palette of materials will be different than the historic building; but will be true to their natural characteristics with heavy materials at the bottom of walls. El.c Highly reflective materials will not be used anywhere on this project. E2. Inflection. Both of the resulting lots created by the proposed lot split will be less than 6000 sq ft; thus this criteria does not apply to either house. Section 26.415 - Historic Preservation Section 26.415.070 - Development involving designated historic property or property within a historic district. Section 26.415.07OD Certificate of appropriateness for major development Dl. This development meets all the criteria for being a major development: a. it is building a new structure in the historic district b. it is altering more than 3 elements of the existing building in the restoration work of the Victorian and adding an addition to the back. c. it is expanding the floor area by more than 250 sq. ft. D2. This project does not need any additional Land Use approvals. 03. Please see section 26.304 above for the general application information. The attached drawings shall include all listed drawings and requirements, including conceptual materials, and 3D renderings of the project. See Section 26.410 above to see how the project complies with the residential design standards; see Section 26.415.110 for a detailed summary of the variances being requested. We will comply with the posting and mailing of public notices prior to any/all meetings to complete this process. Section 26.415.080 - Demolition of Designated Properties Al. This application to the HPC seeking approval to renovate and remodel a historic resource, gain a historic lot split and build a new home on the newly created lot, includes the request to demolish the non historic parts of the existing building that have been added over the years. We will renovate the historic home back to is original appearance and put an addition on the back. 802 E. Cooper Avenue, Suite 4 I Aspen, Colorado I 81611 I 970.925.2252 .. A2. Please see above for general information in Section 26.304. A2b. Using the Sanborn and Sons Maps, it is evident that the original structure has been enlarged. The attached photo shows the line where the original foundation ends and new construction methods begin. Please see attached Map also. W -u34 ~7 - 1./I.--Il-=.Ir. , 3 . .. 1 -Â· ~011 -- - 91 r .2 0 B. 1 - $-- - --1 -- i h h .: -I 1 .4. It is from this point back that we will do the demolition. In the front of the house, from the section of roof that is only one story to the east will be removed. See photo above. The portion of the original structure that is still intact, is only 23% of the existing building. We will deconstruct as much of the building as possible to re-use or re- purpose the materials. A3. We ask that this demolition request be reviewed with the rest of this project by the HPC, so it will be included in the posting and mailings. A4. The additions to the original structure meet the following criteria or the standards for demolition: c) the structure cannot practically be moved to another appropriate location in Aspen; it is not worth the expense to move it and d) it has no historic significance making it worthy of being moved. It is evident from the photos that the additions are of more modern construction. There are files in the building department showing building permit applications in the past 30 years. Additional Criteria: a) The large additions, behind and to the east of the historic home, have no significance to the parcel or the Historic district as it was constructed decades after the original home; it's removal will not be a loss to the community at large or the historic parcel. 802 E. Cooper Avenue, Suite 4 I Aspen, Colorado I 81611 I 970.925.2252 1-- }1 1111111 1111Illl!!l~Il U,1.P>54~ .. b) The integrity of the Historic parcel and Historic District will not be adversely affected by the removal of the additions. The important and significant historic resource is the home facing Hallam Avenue. c) Demolishing these additions will have no bearing on the historic preservation of the area; it is the house that has significance and it will be renovated and restored to it's original appearance; with more of the original house being visible than can be seen now with the addition. B. We are not seeking a certificate of economic hardship. Section 26.415.090 - Relocation of Designated Historic Properties Al. Please see above for general information in Section 26.304. A2. The existing structure has been very well cared for over the years and is in excellent structural shape to withstand the relocation. The original home will be moved, after all the non-historic additions have been removed, using the technology and practices that are typical of this type of work; being done by a reputable contractor with a history of successful house movings. The move will also be overseen by the structural engineerthat will outline all required bracing and shoring for the move. A3. The entire original structure will be lifted and shifted forward and to the west. For the construction of the proposed basement, the building will be left on the temporary structure that suspends it above the ground high enough to allow needed excavation and construction of a new foundation and basement level of the new structure. The proposed plan for this building is to move it forward on the existing lot far enough that there can be a substantial single story element between the historic resource and the addition of a modern element at the rear of the lot and still meet the 5'-0" rear yard setback. The new location of the home is largely determined by the existing trees on the lot that are being preserved duringthis project and to allow for the addition to the rear; all while staying completely within the setbacks. A4. Once put back on the new foundation, the home will be completely renovated to it's original appearance with new plumbing and electrical systems, any damage done to the building will be repaired and the new addition will be incorporated. A5-9. N/A This house will remain on the original lot. B. Procedures for the Review of Relocation Request. The applicant asks that this request be reviewed with the rest of this package as it is a major development, pursuant to Section 26.304.060.B. The consolidation of all requests will be the most efficient use of time for the members of the HPC, Staff and City Council. Thank you. 802 E. Cooper Avenue, Suite 4 I Aspen, Colorado I 81611 I 970.925.2252 .. C. Standards for the Relocation of Designated Properties The relocation of this building meets criteria 4) The relocation is an acceptable preservation method given the character and integrity of the structure. Additionally, the move will not adversely affect the integrity of the Historic District or diminish the historic, architectural or aesthetic relationships to adjacent properties. The relocation is very minor, allowing for more separation between the historic resource and the proposed addition and the new home proposed on the newly created lot to the east. Additional Criteria: 1. The building is capable of being lifted and shifted onto the new foundation; the structural integrity of the existing building is completely intact. 2. The building is not being relocated to another site. 3. There will be a structural engineer involved in the planning and the physical lifting and shifting of this building. The details of the shoring and bracing will be specified by this engineer and coordinated with the house mover to take all precautions available to protect and stabilize the building during the move. D. Procedures for Considering Request for Relocation of Properties under Consideration for Designation. N/A; this property is already on the Aspen Inventory of Historic Landmark Sites and Structures. Section 26.415.110 Benefits Pursuant to this section of the Land Use Code, the applicant is seeking certain benefits being offered by the City of Aspen to encourage good preservation practices; taking advantage of the preservation tools that were developed to help owners, in response to the tight historic preservation controls legislated by the City. A. Historic Landmark Lot Split The code allows for properties on the Aspen Inventory of Historic Landmark Sites and Structures to be exempt from the subdivision and GMQS requirements allowing owners to create a second dwelling unit on the designated property that contains the historic resource and/or to create a completely new lot through a historic lot split. We are requesting the benefit of creating a new lot through Section 26.470.060 of the Land Use Code. Section 26.470.060.2 Allows for the development of a new single family home on a newly created parcel that originated from a historically landmarked parcel. Along with the benefit of creating a new lot and new home, comes the requirement to provide for affordable housing. This project will go with option 6 for a single family home. 6) Providing a Certificate of Affordable Housing Credit as mitigation, pursuant to Section 26.540.060 Authority of the Certificate, commensurate with the net increase of square footage, according to Aspen/Pitkin County Housing Authority Guidelines, as amended. This section also states that no affordable housing mitigation shall be required as a result of the addition to the historic resource on the original lot. 802 E. Cooper Avenue, Suite 4 1 Aspen, Colorado 1 81611 1 970.925.2252 .. B. Increased Density This project is not increasing density on one lot; rather we are seeking to create two lots from one large one with one single family home on each lot. Cl. Variances The applicant does not seek any dimensional variances for either of the homes on the two lots. Please see Attachment 3 of the Historic Preservation Land Use Application. The variances being sought are deviations from the residential design standards. As described above, both homes have subordinate linking elements that are wider than the allowed 10'-0. As stated, we are striving to save the large trees on the front of the lot and stay within our setbacks in every direction, so we have been compressed. The links meet the 9'0 plate height and minimum length of 10'-0; but the Victorian link is 17'-6 wide and the Modern link is 15'-3 wide. We feel that both linking elements meet the intent of the design standard in that they are both set in from the plane of the walls of the primary elements of the houses, truly being a link between two other building elements. On the Victorian home, the link was designed into the building to expose (and rebuild/re-create) the back walls of the original home; addingto the value of the renovation that is planned forthis home. The other design standard that is not met to the letter or dimension of the code, is the 60% frontage of the west facade of the Victorian being within 5'0 of the side yard setback line. Due to the large trees on 6~h Street, we have held the house further from the side yard to protect these trees. We ask that the HPC excuse us from meeting this standard to the full 60%; we have 58%. Cla. We feel that the small variances from the residential design standards is in keeping with the pattern and characteristics of the historic district by leaving the Victorian a bit more centered on the lot and creating a significant distinction between the historic and new construction. D. Parking We are not seeking a parking variance, we are providing 4 spaces. E. Conditional Uses We are not seeking a conditional use. F. Floor Area Bonus: We are asking that the HPC grant the 500 sq. ft. bonus to this project. 1. Please consider the following: a) The Victorian meets all of the residential design standards except for the width of the linking element and the amount of frontage of the west fa,ade of the house to the side yard. We feel that the intent of these standards are met but not to the full dimension; both elements are the result of working around the existing large trees. b) The Victorian is the key element of the property, remaining on the corner lot 802 E. Cooper Avenue, Suite 4 1 Aspen, Colorado 1 81611 1 970.925.2252 .. and the design is respectful to original home by having the addition be more narrow than the original structure and keeping the new second story roof shorter than the Victorian roof, making it subordinate to the original home both in width and height. c) Using photos and the Sanborn and Son's Maps, we are restoring what remains of the original building to it's historic appearance, even rebuilding portions of the structure that have been demolished. d) The new addition is reflective of the historic building's proportional patterns in form, material and openings. The addition has a main gable ridge running in the same direction as the main ridge of the historic building; incorporates running a portion of the main ridge lower than the eave line for a secondary purpose (the Victorian covered the front porch this way; the addition covers the stairs to the new second story in the same fashion); the openings in the addition are tall and narrow, reflecting the double hung windows in the Victorian; and there will be wood siding on the addition. e) The construction materials for the renovation and the new construction will be of the highest quality available. f) The linking element is set back 5'-0 from the west fa,ade of the original building and will be mostly glazing, making for a distinct and almost transparent transition from original to new. g) There are no historic outbuildings to retain on this property. h) The large trees on both Hallam and 6th St. are being saved. From the size of some of them, the must be historic! F2. As outlined above, we feel that we are meeting all of the criteria to be considered for the 500 sq. ft. bonus to the greatest extent possible and feasible while saving the trees. This project demonstrates exemplary preservation practices. G. Exemption from GMQS requirements. Please see below for response to Section 26.470.060.1. H. Waiver of Impact Fees. As offered by the HPC as an incentive/reward for good preservation practices, we would like the fees outlined in Section 26.610.100, the Parks Development Fee and the TDM/Air Quality Fee to be waived for the new home and the Victorian pursuant to Section 26.600.030 Exemptions for homes on the Aspen Inventory of Historic Landmarked Sites and Structures. We are not seeking any further fee waivers. 0. Building codes. The International Building Code (IBC) provides for flexibility in its application to historic structures. In addition to the IBC, the City has adopted the International Existing Building Code (IEBC) to assist owners in making repairs in a manner that minimizes intrusion into the historic structure. We are asking for this code to be available to us as we get into the renovation and addition to the Victorian. 802 E. Cooper Avenue, Suite 4 1 Aspen, Colorado 1 81611 1 970.925.2252 .. Section 26.470.060.1 - GMQS; Single family development on historic landmark properties. Please see response above under Section 26.415.110 Benefits where this is addressed. Section 26.480.060.B - Historic Landmark Lot Split 1. Pursuant to Section 26.480.030 General Subdivision Review Standards, this project complies with the requirements of meetings, mailings and postings. Further, pursuant to Section 26.480.040, General Subdivision Review Standards will be met as follows: A. Guaranteed Access to a Public Way. Both resulting lots from the proposed lot split shall have perpetual, unobstructed vehicular access via the alley. B. Alignment with Original Townsite Plat. The proposed lot lines will remain in alignment with the original Townsite Plat, merely creating one new parallel boundary, running in the north/south direction to divide one lot into two lots. C. Zoning Conformance. Both new homes will conform to all of the zoning requirements of the R-6 zone district. D. Existing Structures, Uses and Non-Conformities. There are no non- conformities on the lot that is being split; thus no increase to such shall occur. 2. The fathering parcel, 530 W Hallam, is listed on the Historic Sites and Structures Inventory. 3. The original lot is being split in two, creating only one new lot. 4. The floor area for both homes will come from the R-6 Zone District allowance for a duplex on a 9000 sq. ft. parcel. This FAR allowance is 4080 sq. ft. With the obtainment of the HPC floor area bonus, the allowable FAR to be divided between the two residences is 4580 sq ft. Section 26.515 Off-Street Parking Section 26.515.030 requires two off-street parking space per dwelling unit. Each of the homes will have two car garages. These garages will meet the dimensional requirements of 8'-6" x 18'-0" and be 9'-0 tall for each space. The garages are located on the alley. Section 26.575.020 - Calculations and Measurements. Please see attached Floor Area Ratio Calculations. These calculations were made in accordance with the regulations and rules of this section and Section 26.710.040 R-6 medium Density Zone District. The Floor Area for this parcel is 4080 sq. ft. for a duplex on a 9000 sq. ft. lot, plus the requested floor area bonus of 500 sq. ft. = 4580 sq. ft. of allowable FAR; if the bonus is granted. The current measurements and calculations per this section have been used in the calculation of floor area for the building, including the subgrade space; and the Site 802 E. Cooper Avenue, Suite 4 1 Aspen, Colorado 1 81611 1 970.925.2252 .. plan addresses the front, rear and side yard setbacks. The elevations show compliance with the height limitations as described herein. Please see attached drawings for the FAR Calculations, Site plan and Exterior Building Elevations. The changes to the existing building and all new construction complies with the definitions, requirements and limitations as outlined in this section. Section 26.600 - Impact Fees and Dedications Section 26.600.030 Exemptions. The Victorian, being listed on the Inventory of Historic Sites and structures is exempt from the Parks and TDM fees. The Modern home, although being on a lot that was fathered from a Historic Landmarked Site is not exempt. We are asking for a waiver of these fees for the Modern home pursuant to Section 26.415.110 Benefits. Section 26.710 - R-6 Zone District; Medium Density Please see the Application form, dimensional requirements for a summary of the dimensional requirements or allowances and the proposed measurement. Please see the attached Site Plan, for compliance with setbacks. All changes or additions to the parcel and the new lot will be in compliance with the setback requirements as outlined for R-6. Please see Attached Floor Area Calculations that demonstrate that this project is in compliance with the FAR regulations for R-6. In Summary, the proposed development of this property, including moving, renovating and putting an addition on the historic resource; creating a new lot by means of a lot split; and building a new home on the new lot; comply with all requirements, allowances, limitations and restrictions as outlined in Title 26 of the Land Use Code as described above. This includes the request for small design standard variance and benefits as offered by the City and the Historic Preservation Commission to projects that are demonstrating excellence in preservation efforts to save our historic resources and the heritage of Aspen. We feel that this project meets all of the criteria and design standard intentions to be an outstanding Historic Preservation project. Thank you for your time and consideration of this project. We look forward to working with the HPC on this project. Sincerely, Kim Raymond, Principal Kim Raymond Architects, Inc 802 E. Cooper Avenue, Suite 4 I Aspen, Colorado I 81611 I 970.925.2252 .. HISTORIC PRESERVATION GUIDELINES The following is in response to the guidelines outlined for Conceptual approval in regard to the Historic Resource. 7.1 Preserve the original form of a roof. a. The proposed renovation and addition is designed around preserving the original design of the home; including keeping the original roof. We will eliminate all of the past additions and renovations. The original roof is being maintained and repaired. In response to the historic roof, the new roof over the addition will have a ridge that runs the same direction as the main ridge of the original; extending a small portion of the roof down to cover the stairs coming up from the link. This is the same way the historic front porch is constructed; a continuation of the main, upper roof. b. The detail of the roof eave and fascia will be restored to the original detail. The new fascia and trim pieces shall be new lumber, milled to match the existing. 7.2 Preserve the original eave depth a. The depth of the existing roof overhang will be maintained at the entire existing building. 7.3 Minimize the visual impacts of skylights and other rooftop devices. a. There are no skylights or roof top devices of any sort proposed for the Victorian. 8.3 Avoid attaching a garage or carport to the primary structure The tradition of adding garages to the rear of the site as a separate structure is being followed with the addition of the garage to the Victorian by means of a link off the back of the original Victorian building; to be accessed from the alley. This garage will have a second story with a footprint that is smaller than the garage off of the alley. 8.4 A garage door should be compatible with the character of the historic structure a. The garage will be a new, separate structure from the original; there will be no garage doors on the historic structure. b. There will be overhead doors in the new garage. The materials will be compatible with the new section of building and complimentary in scale to the existing. The garage doors will not bee seen from any public view plane at the same time as the front fagade of the original building. The garage door will have a small frame and dividers to be in scale with the historic building and will have frosted glass panels. 9.1 Proposals to relocate a building will be considered on a case-by-case basis. a. The historic home is not located within a historic district. This home was originally constructed in the center of two city blocks and set back further from the street than the other homes on the block and the adjacent home on the lot across Fifth street. Moving the home forward on the lot will bring it more in line with the front facades of the rest of the block, according to the Sanborn and Sons maps and the homes that are in existence today. Moving it to be more centered on one city lot, will be similar to the way smaller homes were historically located. Thus the impact on the historic district is very negligible and the historic home is renovated. b. This home, with all of the additions that have been added to it over the decades, spans three city lots. The best way for this house to be preserved and renovated to it's historic appearance, is move it to the one lot on the corner to allow for the construction .. of another home on the remaining two lots. If the home is not moved, the old additions will remain and be altered and added onto. This will not bring the home back to it's historic appearance facing Hallam or 5th streets. The proposed design will reveal the historic rear corners of the home adding an addition with a subordinate link; the new rear addition is much more in line with the current Historic guidelines. Additionally, the proposed home on the newly created lot will also have a smaller, front element; with a gabled roof facing the street. This will show respect to the historic home and provide a 'transitional' sized home between the historic Victorian and the newer, more massive existing home to the east. c. The first step to rehabilitation of this home is to remove all of the additions to the original structure. Using the Sanborn and Sons Maps, we have determined what is historic and of significance and what is not. We will remove all that is not historic. We do not know what the original back portion of the house looks like, but we are using the same dimensions of the back element shown on the maps for the new linking element. d. The home will be completely braced and shored, with all the additions removed before the lifting and moving begins. The house will be moved by an experienced and insured house mover. When placed on the new foundation, we will place red sandstone veneer on the new concrete foundation in only the locations of the original foundation. The other siding and trim details will be repaired/replaced as needed to bring the home back to it's historic appearance. e. We will work with the structural engineer and the professional house mover to have a complete plan in place to lift, move and place on a new foundation at the time we submit for a building permit. This will include having the utilities moved to the new location, ready to be hooked up. f. The proposed new construction will be more modern, but still have the same mass and elements as the historic structure. It will be complimentary to the Victorian, and meetall the design guidelines required. g. The home will be moved to the west and north only leaving it on the same property. 9.4 Site the structure in a position similar to its historic orientation. The house is being moved to the west 12'-0 to put it more centered on one city lot; it will still face Hallam street. Moving it forward a few feet will actually put it in more in line with the typical front yard setback of that time. This house was built further back on the lot than most homes in the neighborhood by a few feet. 9.6 When rebuilding a foundation, locate the structure at its approximate historic elevation above grade. The relocated home will be placed within inches of it's original elevation above grade. The existing home has two steps up to the front door; it will have two similar steps after the move. The difference will be that the home will be set on a solid, level foundation, making the entry level floor all the same elevation; unlike the existing. 9.7 A lightwell may be used to permit light into below-grade living space. There will be lightwells allowing the light, ventilation and egress from the sub grade space per the life safety codes of the IRC. These wells will be of minimum size, will not face Hallam street and will not provide for walk out space. There will, however be a .. couple lightwells on the Fifth St facing fagade; but held back from the entry or Hallam Street fagade, reducing their visibility from the entry fagade. 10.1 Preserve an older addition that has achieved historic significance in it's own right This property has numerous additions to the historic home; none of which are historic or have any relevance to Aspen's history or historically active architects. 10.2 A more recent addition that is not historically significant may be removed. We are planning on removing the additions to the rear and east of the historic building. The house will be renovated to it's original appearance, to the best of our ability from photos and the Sanborn & Sons Maps. 10.3. Design a new addition such that one's ability to interpret the historic character of the primary building is maintained a. The new addition to this structure will be consistent with the original Victorian in material selection, mass and form. The new siding material will be wood siding that is similar to the scale of the original siding, but milled to a different profile and will be the same color as the original building to tie it together. b. The new addition will not imply an earlier time period, trying to be like the original Victorian; rather it will be complimentary. The design uses the same roof pitches and scale of building in the addition, but different details to be in step with contemporary design elements of today. c. The addition is intentionally complimentary to the original Victorian, while also being clearly a newer addition. The new link will be mostly glass, a complete departure from the historic materials and details; but subordinate by the use of 'light' materials. d. The link will be attached to the original house in such a waythat a substantial section of the rear corner of the building will be visible form both sides of the link. The removal of the non-historic additions will allow us to reveal the original rear ofthe home; which will need to be rebuilt as part of the renovation work. 10.4 Design a new addition to be recognized as a product of its own time a. The proposed addition will be of the 'transitional' genre of architecture that is being incorporated in the Aspen area at this time, with clean lines and few materials. This genre is very compatible with the simple forms and lack of ornamentation of the Victorian with it's simple lines and minimal detail. It will be contemporary but not have that stark modern look; a very compatible, yet distinct combination of architectural styles. b. The wood siding on the new building will be primarily vertical, and a bit narrower than the horizontal wood siding of the original building. The color will be complimentary or the same. The foundation at the new portion will be concrete, which will be in contrast to the stone that will be replaced on the foundation of the historic section of the building after it is relocated to a new foundation. 10.6 Design an addition to be compatible in size and scale with the main building The addition, although being two stories, will be lower than the peak of the ridge of the historic two story home and will maintain the same small scale dormers as the historic resource. The historic home is actually over the current height limit; the new addition will be in compliance. .. 10.7 If it is necessary to design an addition that is taller than a historic building set it back substantially from the significant facades and use a "connector" to link it to the historic building a. The proposed single story, low profile 'link' between the existing structure and the proposed addition will create the needed separation to allow the new addition to be two stories also, (though shorter)without being a distraction to the original home. b. The single story link is over 15 feet long on the east side and 10' long with a steep roof coming down to it on the west. The steep roof coming from the ridge of the new gable roof is similar to the steep roof originating from the ridge on the historic home to cover the front porch. This section of roof will be narrow, only covering the stairs to the new upper level at the rear. c. The historic home is a two story Victorian with a steep gable roof. The roof over most of the link will be flat, with a plate height of 9'-0; making it very subordinate and meeting this criteria. 10.8 Place an addition at the rear of a building or set it back from the front to minimize the visual impact on the historic structure and to allow the original proportions and character to remain prominent. a The proposed addition is going to be placed at the rear of the home, connected by a single story link that will expose the rear corners of the historic home. b. There will be a new basement under both the existing and new portions of the building. c. The historic structure, with the addition that faces Hallam removed, will allow the original proportions and character of the home to be seen once again. The addition behind the link is also narrow, so it won't over shadow the historic structure; rather it will be of a similar scale and proportion. 10.9 Roof forms should be similar to those of the historic building. a. The new roof is also a gable with the same slope as the original. The dormers will be small to be in character with the proportions of the historic resource and also the same slope. b. The only area of flat roofs on the proposed addition will be at the link and a small section of roof facing the alley. This allows the gable on the new roof to be the same, smaller proportion, to be complimentary to the historic roof. 10.10 Design an addition to a historic structure such that it will not destroy or obscure historically important architectural features The historic home will be rehabilitated to it's historic appearance by removing all of the additionsto the original building. The same simple trim and details will be restored to the entire structure. The proposed linking element will be constructed to reveal the rear corners of the historic home on both the east and west sides; and the entire east side of the primary residence will be revealed again when the front addition is removed. .. For the new house: 11.1 Orient the primary entrance of the new building to the street. The entrance to the new home will face Hallam Street and will the building will be parallel to the lot lines; typical of the traditional grid pattern of the neighborhood. 11.2 In a residential context, clearly define the primary entrance to the new building by using a front porch. The new home will have a front porch that is similar is size and scale to the one on the adjacent Victorian. The front door will face the street and there will be a walk way leading to the entry porch from the street. 11.3 Construct a new building to appear similar in scale with the historic buildings on the parcel. The new building will be only one story at the front of the lot, which is different than the historic, two story Victorian. The new home will have a similar, though shorter, front module; making the scale and proportions of the two buildings similar. The new home will also have a subordinate link with more mass at the back of the residence. 11.4 Design a front elevation to be similar in scale to the historic building. The front facade on the new building is actually shorter than the historic Victorian. The roof on the west side of the new building, adjacent to the Victorian, will be a gable to reflect the genre of the historic building, but will be a one story element; the east side of this roof will be flat, giving a nod to the more modern architecture of today. The front porch on the new home is similar in size to the historic porch. 11.5 Use building forms that are similar to the historic property. The new home will have narrower building elements and gable roofs. The links will be flat on both buildings and similar in size. The garages on both homes will face the alley and will have a living space above with gable roofs with small sections of the new roofs being flat. 11.6 Use roof forms that are similar to those seen traditionally in the block. Of course, the Victorian will maintain the steep gable roof as the primary form and the roof on the addition behind it will also have the same steep gable with a long sloping element similarto the element of the front gable that creates the existing front porch. The new residence proposed on the newly created lot will also have a steep gable as the primary roof element facing the street; this gable will be adjacent to the historic building. The front porch will have a flat roof at a similar proportion to the historic entry porches. This flat roof will carry along the eastern side of the front element of the house, being very subsidiary to the gable. In this way, we are using the gable as the primary root and using the flat roof as a way to distinguish this as a newer home. The rear element of the home will also have a combination of a primary gable with smaller sections of flat roof. The eaves and overhangs will remain the same on the Victorian and it's new addition will have eave depths and overhangs that are compatible as projected from the gable ends. The overhangs on the addition will be cut back to nothing to distinguish the new .. gable from the historic. The new residence will have eaves and overhangs treated in the same fashion. There are no exotic roof forms on these homes. 11.10 The imitation of older historic styles is discouraged. The design of the new residence is compatible with the Victorian, by virtue of using the steep gables; yet distinct in the way there are minimal details that will make it obvious it is of a later time period. This holds true for the addition to the Victorian as well. In Summary, we are happy to be restoring this historic home to its original appearance, as we appreciate the quality and character of this very well preserved and unique two story Victorian property. The design of the renovation and addition took into account all of the Historic Preservation guidelines to minimize any impact to the historic resource, making the rehabilitation complete. Thank you for your help and consideration of our permit. We feel that the proposed design meets the intent of all of the criteria, as outlined in the code, for both the Historic and Residential Design Standards. Sincerely, Kim Raymond, Principal Kim Raymond Architects, Inc IMPROVEMENI SURVEY PLAI OF: 530 W. HALLAM STREET SECTION 12, TOWNSHIP 10 SOUTH, RANGE 85 WEST OF THE 6th P.M. 92<,1.-Â·-â€¢'Â· . ..7(2> 1 4 : ', â€ž - 'mp LOTS K, L & M, BLOCK 28 CITY & TOWNSITE OF ASPEN Â·'Â·' fu.MU# Â·'h-D. Â· rek\'4Â·â€žL-i COUNTY OF PITKIN, STATE OF COLORADO elli<ZE,Millali SHEET 1 OF 2 ,'A . Â· * 2~@*RC 1 6 Pull ' 2 Pal, j I. I $. - 1 .Zb. . '..:t . f 546:,rÂ·r :Â·Â·..,Nny.791-Â·: VICINITY MAP tCAL! 2 â€¢ XOC m (01, PROPERTY DESCRIPTION Aic 10 4~7416 ~C NO 477706 ,<.0 =D UARK~AOOInON 1 RECEPTION NO 522237} I LOTS K. L I M BLOCK 28, CITY AND TOWNSITE OF ASPEN ,auâ€ž0â€ž0 ~~teâ€¢â€¢Â·â€¢OC~P n ,-~*11,0,K-*0.*g ri -3 \ -- rouNOM .I...lusllcaP I ' 1,16. , 08 1 L 9406# . L #i- &.W'WG~'{Ap 7~ 07 MIOWT CI WA~ *%%'1!InA~&~116-,t~Â«-- 0-.UlÂ¥ 60Â¢6 4 GRAWL 5umm . S.*.-E '70.= , 3 SURVEY NOTES ETNMBAR/%TICCAP / / 59Â¢m,T- 1) DATE OF FIELD WORK J.Â¥ 14 15 AND SEPTEMBER 23, 2014 76 2. MIGH[Â·01 WAr rk., //// ,T,~TR~fT ~b 6~ RIGHT 01 WA~ ASPHA~W~ACT /, . DATE OF PREPARATION: JULYAND SEPTEMBER. 2014 3) BASIS OF BEARING: A BEARINGOF N80*41'42~E BETWEEN THE SOUTHWESTCORNER CfTYOf A~PENCONT< OF BLOCK 28 (MONUMENTED BY A 1" PIPE WITH AN UNMARKEDMETAL CAP) AND THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF CLARK 5 ADDITION SUBDIVISION (MONUMENTED WITH A NO 5 iMONU- NO 9 LOT K ~01' LOT~ A 4- *m LO'. m e' .. REBAR WITH AN ILLEGIBLE CAP) 971,1 1 //1.- 4) BASIS OF SURVEY IDOCUMENTS PER COUNTY RECORDS): THE HISTORIC LANDMARK LOT SPLIT AT 533 W FRANCIS STREET SUBDIVIgON EXEMPTION PLAT RECORDED 1 ... I " 2"e JANUARÂ¥24,2003.RECEPTION NO. 477706; T. IMPROVEMENT AND TOPOGRAPHIC SURVEY OF LOTS A. B. AND C .OCK 28 ORIGINAL ASPEN TOWNSITE DEPOSITED MAY 1 2000 AS RECEPTION NO 442863; THE CONDOMINIUM MAP OF CLARK'S ADDITION RECORDED JULY 18.1980 AS RECEPTION NO 225432, THE FIRST SUPPLEMENTAL PLAT TO THE CONOOMINIUM MAP OF CLARKS ADOITION RECORDED JANUARY 26. 1981 AS "IA.ENCONTR(X B#w MONUMENT Id~ I RECEPTION NO. 230437; THE OFFICIAL MAP OF THE CITY OF ASPEN. PREPARED BY G.E "DI.FRANCI& 1 'PE W'UNMARKÂ£/ M..{Â» BUCHANAN. DATED DECEMBER 15. 1959; CITY OF ASPEN GPS CONTROL HAL,AM./EFT MONUMENTATION MAP PREPARED eY MARCIN ENGINEERING.C DATED DECEMBER 2 ,~ â€ž lucHT 0**A~ 2009; VARIOUS DOCUMENTS OF RECORD; AND THE FOUND MONUMENTS, AS SHOWN. 5) THIS SURVEY DOES NOT CONSTITUTE A TITLE SEARCH BY SOPRIS ENGINE ERING. LLC ~SE) TO DETERMINE OWNERSHIP OR EASEMENTS OF RECORD FOR All INFORMATION REGARDING EASEMENTS, RIGHTS OF WAY AND/OR TITLE OF RECORD. SE RELIED UPON THE ABOVE SAID PLATS DeCRIBED IN NOTE 4 ANO THE TlnE COMMITMENT PREPARED BY PITKIN COUNTY TITLE, INC., CASE NO. PCT24123W WITH AN EFFECTIVE DATEDF JULY 10 2014 6/ 8.~IS OF E 'VATION, THE 2009 CITY OF ASPEN MARCIN CONTROL DATUM, WHICH 15 B..00*-13 BASED ON AN ELEVATION OF 7720 88' (NAVD 1988) ON THE NGS STAT1ON 5-159. THIS PRODUCED A LOCAL SITE BENCHMARK AT THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF THE SUBJECT . 09 PROPERTY, SHOWN HEREON CONTOUR INTERVAL IS ONE Ill FOOT. 1%\, i SURVEYOR'S CERTIFICATE 1. MARK 5 BECKLER. HEREBY CERTIFY TO SHAFROTH ASPEN HOUSE, LLC A CO~ORâ‚¬% LIMITED LIABILITY COMPANY, ASPENSTARWOOD .C AND PITKIN COUNTY TITLE. INC.. THAT THISISAN "IMPROVEMENT SURVEY PLAT" AS DEFINED EY C.R S Â§ 38-51 102(91 AND GRAPHIC SCALE THAT IT IS A MONUMENTED LAND SURVEY SHOWING THE CURRENT LOCATION OF ALL STRUCURES. WATER COURSES, WATER FEATURES AND/OR BODIES OF WATER. FLOOD PLAIN VISIBLE ROAD~. TRAILS, UTIUTIES. FENCES. HEOGES, OR WAL.'TUATED ON THE DESCRI8ED PARCEL AND WITHIN FIVE FEET OF ALL BOUNDARIES OF SUCH PARCEL ANY {IN.,1 CONFUCTiNG BOUNDARY EVIDENCE OR VISIBLE ENCROACHMENTS, ANO ALL EASEMENTN 1 i.ch = 30 ft AND RIGHTS OF WAY OF A PUBLIC OR PRIVATE NATURE THAT ARE VISIBLE, OR APPARE Ni OR OF RECORD AND UNDERGROUND UTILITIES /"CRIBED,N 'TKIN COUNTY TITLE, INr % TITLE 11,15URANCE CASE NO PC24123W, OR OTHER SOURCES AS SPECIFIED ON THE SOPRIS ENGINEERING - LLC IMPROVEMENT SURVEY PLAT. CIVIL CONSULTANTS 502 MAIN STREET, SUITE A3 *&9=#U==.'Ir-'(. CARBONDALE, COLORADO 81623 MARK 5. BECKLER L S. #28643 (970) 704-0311 SOPRISENG@SOPRISENG COM - al -,L --- -- . 31 - IMPROVEMENT SURVEY PLA[ Ol 530 W. HALLAM STREET SECTION 12, TOWNSHIP 10 SOUTH, RANGE 85 WEST OF THE 6th P.M. LOTS K, L & M, BLOCK 28 CITY & TOWNSITE OF ASPEN COUNTY OF PITKIN, STATE OF COLORADO SHEET 2 OF 2 LOT 1 REC. NO. 477706 REC. NO. 477706 1 9 . BLOCk 28 ALLEY ~ I . I EXISTING CONDITIONS LEGEND 2147' RIGHT-OF-WAY . 4 ' A O CAN,[DESTAL â€¢ GRAVEL SURF#CE 3. -'.O 6 R./.1.....Ap . 2.641 . ELECTRICMETER W~N[D %- 4 MASTICCAP 1 .T/.5SCOR.H 9 7209'11 F 0 m.2- 4 - 4.Â·, -0 -0- IRONaNCE 1- K UN.#~LAMm. 4 1 -0-.- WOOD61~ FENC[ Tâ€¢,-b.mi I Â«-1-,1 1 /1 / fl . DECIDUOUSTR. CON[/ROUSTREE 9 . 11 L'.~19 / ) % "U SINGLE FAMILY MULTI LEVEL ..~ (~ EÂ¤GE"VEGE - W,NOOWW.11 ~ WOOD FRAME HOUSE j, ,~- < i i " T 530 W, HALLAM ST. o,_20' E _. 1 |â€ž_all_,8,000 Sa. FT, +/- %. m . ,> bl,4 1 A 0.207 AC. +/-24>01Â«R/ ' . u u N\\ .00 // / 411 4 R , D t-3. lA ,Â·Â·Â·- ~LAUDOHAPPAI,01 I Â»\ t | /-1 8./.,Ir//CleÂ»*.A~i . .. 6,! TIF RFWNIM ). AC[LS&/iOALCHurl LOT N - 13 7' CONF...5 5 > 31 1~ cONIFERUous Y, f.5~ 0 W Â«/14= *,Â« u : 9%14-< 1 1 11Â»Â«-: giN:*Noffn a /00' 3 f*4#441, ' fr 1 lu b<\- 1 4 : 0 1(-11 a-3 44 1,1 f A LOT K LOTt 1 > \ ,- WOT St- 243-CONIFERUOUS ' 44 3- Cttiuous Y r \ th )4 75Â·0'11,1 W k 202~CONIFERUOUS I I b ~ (C'_.9000 - <66,034~.'LI,~ "'./.PIA$.... ./.bla. 0 4 E 7 62* *w 4 23 3 coN,EERUOub / 5 ' \tu- Cifitj#944Â£ it - F11 ~n , t __s,IRAI,NfnÂ¥11 1 Pâ€¢PE .,ul.*AM,t01,41& c- ,MOJEC, BEI.CI,~AAK HFVAf,Oh â€¢7911.19 HALLAM STREET 21 -M- *2 74.38' RIGHT-OF-WAY GRAPHIC SCALE ASPHALTSURFACE 4_- 1 49242.4 [ IN FEETI SOPRIS ENGINEERING - LLC linih= 10 ft CIVILCONSULTANTS 502 MAIN STREET, SUITE A3 ACTO~JeA~OUe Ap,Â¥D,Cr=u,M~, iNTHPEEnÂ»1 CARBONDALE, COLORADO 81623 (970) 704-0311 SOPRISENG@SOPRISENG.COM 00.001 M i.61,05.*I 5 5TH STREET ~ 76.24' RIGHT-OF-W Y 14 8 CONFRET*RFACE (TYP ) - 0 0 U ti U,1 Icl .--- WINDOW WELL -4 T - 885 sa ft E ~ Z.Â» 1~ft---Mr- ZE 20soft~ -0.. 2 i: 7- -7-7 / Al -14 1,5 8 2 eqft /2/ 1 % 11 // if --J - SEALED OFF APPARENT 2,2 9 4 saft ~ BASEMENT OR CRAWLSPACE - %*PIE %519:EEKE ACCESS/COAL CHUTE RAII TIF RFTAINING WAII / 1 2 ......Â£ ..n .UNS'.4 ...RE#<. / P=Â«-1 r---1 -r -M-- +I Cum'- LA li 14.5 9.-fl F... -784 ea ftl 2~- -----J 1 % 13 8 sitt 2 3-4 5/â‚¬ -0 m LA 29.0 1 Sâ„¢E ./. I N UPPER LEVEL DEMO MAIN LEVEL DEMO O 0 DATE ISSUE SCHEWIC 50-6 LOKER LEVEL NOT INCLUDED IN CALCULATIONS. MAIN LEVEL EXISTINO (22 94â€¢148â€¢ 1 3 8,8 6 â€¢20)â€¢265 6 SF PEMO 152 +784â€¢136 1 614 SF UPPER LEVEL EXIST,NG (1582 Â· 62) 1 644 SF DEMO 655â€¢172.1451SF_ - -el, TOTAL EXISTING EXISTINe 433OSF DEMO 3181 SF 11-101'-3 - Scale AS NOTED 2 4 939F /381 8 -722% DEMO A ===a==3 L.N.,6 /7,6, :36'L BAA L, 1,Â£ .Ir* *AVE 22 Al.4 LOWER LEVEL DEMO SCALE ./ 1332319 FIV-11Â¥H M 06 NOI-LVAON3bl NVIWOr)IA OO'N3dSÂ¥' S01Â¥0 On30 . Â¥AÂ¥, 1 v r .~D~~ MY .Â» 1 = 11,114 - . .,1/1 Â¥7 ,4 -- 6,1," 0 1 1%4..4...A - 8,1... -/ 4. 11 /e> . 9/ Ull- J 19. .--1/==1- ...1-... . . i ==6 -0,// 43#W~ -- - = /1 -&... '11 . .9 7 .1.-E vi . i 4 / M â€¢ Sh - 0 --- . h .. . . A 4 / â€¢ 2*Â·h 1 - . r j P/: Â·:Â· t~ â€¢tk'.St Â».,7,11 -â‚¬ , .4-AE .. . 1,1 .' @4~ 1/ Â·i - .. '.I .. - 4,1 ~ - . ..23... - '44'M:." ~'.*il7 .. .. 1-AC TbAL A . .. A . 'illi~ilillitit .... . LOT SIZE: 9,000 SF ALLEY LOT SIZE: 9,000 SF ........ INE ....id g G,1 Ex STNG TREE ~ 6- N 0 - 5 U HeE -<1'L -cyEMAIN IF VIBLE V Oul (21*â€¢*aF ...Gh. - -79 Erv LINE- f KI .5-*5./. -INE m 14 N W Z 1 -% :-P J â‚¬9 1 1 - , 1 /11 1 1 -- 11\ ' 1-n- 1 -- , Ul It 7 0/9 U C. Al-7 /1 j -- 25; L.-1 - - - - - _ -. - - - - - - -222 1 -r 4 n M I ,Cla. Al i OFS,GhS I.AS ARRINGFUENTS AND PLA.d 3 1 == INDICATED BY THESE DRAWINGS AND | SPECIACATION' A.E THE PROPERTY AND CCPYmGHT OF KIM ~InOID> ARCHITECTS ~C 1Â·-6 1 , 4 / )) | WMATSOEVER WITIIOUT WRITYEN PER-SSION ) 'CRIUSED.V.*OTHERPEASONIP#YISE //-1==- -1-11 - 1 AT TIE SITE ANY .-ENSIONAL DISCREPANCÂ¥ WmTTEN D-ENSIONS S,~11 TAME PRECEDENCE I | S~IALL M BROUGM'r TO TME ArfEN'r,CÂ»~ OF n,E /-2>0 , 67 0 i -t , , mi_11-11 71 ' AACH~ECT-ORTOCCM-/CE*/TOCWCRK 1 r.+1 19-2 1 .H++1484 -'-- i 1- E-1 1 1111111111 15 L Ilu.L!16 8.2 +2- I 1 lili lilli l t Vip 1/ k kfi~-0 14-G . 1 L 8 -3 3/4- 1 -r- U 1 1 1 1 ExISTÂ·No Â·./.9 -2-6 3/4 -1 64 TS REMA ' 1 0 1 74 241 w 1 1 \U. 0<~k- 111= I .Â«,211 Â»fr-/ 1 Â¥- ===- L Â»Â» ------Â©Â»j~- r~ED Xly 1-/ 1 . 12 11 0 .-- 13 N . ./ p E--0 J - 4 * a j'll~ 11% \|/ 10 11 0Â§(12/ 35'-1 1/2 v /li F~047 -0*2,41,1 1/ 30 r 1 1%Â£*-~4Â·12//fr.NOT.ES 1< 1 \>4 4 - W U Kia---3_ _ L f -,0- -- ---1 TO p.,LIN I ' SET/Al.- NE - - - 20- -8-44- 1.â‚¬241*5> -0--- r. 1 \bET-BACK 61'* ijd -_j- -J 5 -0 . 5-0.~1 1 R 4 \1 3, HAU -+OPECY - 7 -TA- 9 9 81 SCHE'All' 9 1 Op=9-~ -NC 4 42; co \4X /97 DATE ISSUE A-j TO~EMAN Â« 0 1/ I ExeT'/6 TREE Z j EA Exella ..SE TO.EMA'N t C TO BE REMOp,* - LAC- \<\~~~~.3 . 7 tt EXIST:Ne TIEES Â»/1 tru TO~EMAIN 6' / EXIST+16 TREE# . ~ ) TO REMAIN -#* 655 10 > Scale AS NOTED #21 HALLAM STREET : THE ABO. li'ENS ON DOES NOT MEASURE ONE 'NCH "'i E.ACTLY THS -â€¢WING M. I.v E BEEN ENLARGEr Og AEDUCEC 2 SITE PLAN 1/8 1.-0. A 0.2 Pblled On 1 15 15 S n-le-,>1Â© LU!M l! 0390dONd - NV1d 318 ndArchitects.corn OSE. 4 -12Â£12%%%a SIXTH STREET 3.1 /1/3/0// VllVH M OES NOI1VAON3kl NVIHODIA SET@-1 1 19 INÂ¥11Â¥H M OES 00'N3dSV 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2.1 ] 11 1 L.----- -- -41 1 . r ll --1- - n - Rk 1--9 ----- - -1- ...1 L - ,=21 1 --- - -1- 2 2133 1 1532 54 ft =I: 9 20 94 ft R 62 sci ft 0 0 1 3,\ 1 Â¥ 1 , - 32 2,2 4 4 90, ft 7-1 1 INDICATED BY THESE DAAWINGS AND SPECIFICATIONS ARE THE PROPERTY AND C..GHT OF KIM ..... ....ECTS K AND * NErf HER BE USED CÂ», ANY Onâ‚¬R VIK)RK NOR CE USED'Â¥ A* OTHER PERSON:OR ANY USE WHATSOE~ER WITHOUT WR,TTEN PER=15SION ImTTBENSIONS SH,4-L TUE PRECEDENCE AT THE SITE ANID-*IAL 015//PANCY . FT--91_ 1 11 SMAL. aE -0%,e To â„¢E Irre.,C~ of â„¢E 1 k-:. -Â® :. 148 54, ft -1--- ,< 0 1 -J--1.1 , 8 esq ft ~2.25, 1.-0 -- 00 4 0 MAIN LEVEL FAR- EXISTING UPPER LEVEL FAR- EXISTING SCALE 3 le = 1 -0 SCALE 3 165- = t'-0Â· LOFNER LEVEL GROSS 101 SF 04596 - 11.7 SF) MAIN LEVEL SROSS 2244 SF 6 0 UPPER LEVEL 6Ross 1582 SF MAIN LEVEL DECKS: DATE ISSUE FRONT PORCHES (EXEMPT) 20+86 106 SF 50-6 , H Â·4 .IHEMATIC COVERED PECK AT SIDE 148 SF f UPPER LEVEL DECKS 62 SF 1 E-- --1 1 LOAER LEVEL BASEMENT PERIMETER; 4- --r' 1 i T TOTAL EXISTING FAR 1-1.-7+2244+1582-3893.-ISF 2(50'-6)+2(14-3 1/2")- 124'-7 r - - if-Â·-4 BASEMENT HE!6HT- 81-0 1 -1- U L /--4 BASEMENT RALLS AREA . 1 036.1 Sa FT FAMILY ROOM .- -1 - .-1 1.LI- -1 LOVVER BEDROOM 1'-10"f r -1- Â»[ --- ...0/ Scale AS NOTED LOKER LEVEL BASEMENT EXPOSED: L | 1 MELL L.525 .Ilill,lizgi= 1'-10)+2-3 1/29.4-4 1/2" ~1 70-1 scift , THE *Bov E Di'ENSION DOE MINDOM RELL EXPOSED HEIeHT - 6'-O NOT MEASURE ONE INCH i BASEMENT RALLS EXPOSED - 26 Sa. FT z~ 1 mxACTLY TIS DRAWING WILL ~AvE BEEN ENLARGED OR REDUCfr %;ECT)NG ALL LABELED SCALE. S EXPOSED 26 Sa FT / 1096.-1 TOTAL - 2.596 EXPOSED A 1.0 LOWER LEVEL FAR- EXISTING SCALE 3 16Â· - 1 C P.led Or 1 Â· 5, I 1, I r 17 LL] O ' Â·130 JI,17'Vplic)Il 9NllSIXEl - SNOU.Vln01Â¥0 hIV=I 11'le-'Mull.Ul>1 Ilell.10 752' INV11VH M OES NOI1VAON3kl NVIHODIA 133hl19 INÂ¥11Â¥H M 0Â£9 00'N3dSV E/L â‚¬-.t, L 11 1 1 1 . I. 16 MOD MOP VIC 0 0 07 ,"ri. 1 EBBR E 52 52 sq ft 33 2 sqft 3 3 5 sq ft 252 sqft 7 8 . 2 3 4 5 4 3 2 1 9 8 7 SOUTH ELEVATION FAR NORTH ELEVATION FAR 'IRA /1 *.C. b AN 1 1 1 . 1 ..4-T OF KIM #-D 'Ir~.INS ./ 6#f FICATIONS ARE tâ€¢,E pqopERT, r.l) S# Nâ‚¬fr,â€¢EAB' USE. 04 'WOTHER ~JR' Â·~OR BE USED.YANÂ¥ OTIERPE'%4/0# AN, li~[ 6/17 N 'll.4510/ /(A.. TAKE ./ECE'El ./\\ J~ SC~LED [IMENSICNIAND SMALL BE VE# ./ ERICâ€¢ er- A- T.' SITE ANY Dil,IENS'ONA [MSCRrPAâ€¢4 .ell." Â«9 . Â·14 RE ./O,-.ir TO ./ A..... IF I â€¢ITTCT [.. C. IFIC-1,14'4. A 4***2:.4 7 TODE r.. INC 146 9) .P I 6-X B - 6.â€¢b ...... t__fiÂ» B 8 00 Il 34 sq ft 36 54 ft 34 54 ft 3 4 54 ft 763 sqft 748 saft D C A D I B A EAST ELEVATION VIC FAR EAST ELEVATION MOD FAR SLA, f VIC BSMT TOTAL AREA 252+252+763+ 163 -2030 EXPOSED VIC 34+36+33 - 103 103/2030- 0.05 FACTOR 0- ...hi E. ST 4 MOD BSMT TOTAL AREA ~ 332+335+748+815 - 2230 DATE ISSUE ~ EXPOSED VIC.34+34+33 - 101 101/2230-0.045 FACTOR 00 8 8 3 esq ft ~ 8 15 sqft 7639â‚¬ft 33 sqft -L 1 1 1 1 E--1 1 1 Scale AS NOTFD I. A.O. DIMENSION ./. NO' MEASURE INE INCH i' EXACTLY T.. m..,% I. HAVE E B ENLARGED OF REC..E r.71/ 4.-ABLEDS'IEC (9 8 Â® A C D WEST ELEVATION MOD FAR WEST ELEVATION VIC FAR 1.1 a +Nl I ll'(' ) '1 '.)*1~1 ''VP.'3Ll' SNOI1VA313 0390dONd - SNOI1Â¥1A01Â¥0 hIV=I 111 H'-1>1(al),L'IM Illfillo 2'42 INÂ¥11Â¥H AA OES NOI1VAON 3kl NVIMODIA 133h]19 INVTIVH M 0Â£9 00 'N)dSV - _ _----~~~ 0 0 0 8 (31 6 1 7 1% = 1 F.2 -2. 2 1- r 1 - -2 , 6 -=7- 7-5 --- - c.1~ 6 ---- -- -1 11 1: 11 .OOPO~ERâ€¢â€¢ANG 'EL.O. :. 1 , / 11 A \ LLIC<~-] 1 1 1 .~11 1:-L \ , -M- , F==i'-7-- . Â¥ 4 4--- ----- ... --.-.-- J 1 4~- ' 1 F~EE STAN.D. 1 ' U il Le==11 r....../. 1% 1 I ........60*'ll h 1 1- . ' I BIB M ft . -- 0 C. -Â· 9 ~16 549 94 - r -11&=4.-1. . 1 It z K -. 5 1 /2'....:4 1 --- - - BEDROOM 4 b &31 - 1 ./1.1 1 1 /1/ 1 2 Â»\1 . Â¥ 7 '- LI__ r=--{F-3 -1_I f =- 1 : h ' 21 4-1 , 1 MECHANICAL f. 1 IASTER SUITE 4.- -NPRY -1- 11 - NI -J : m 1, 20-6 43:. t. 11731 Iâ€ž1 Mul #9 - ' ~'ELI_ TV r -r 31==e-J,L i. 71-ZIZÂ« ON CLOSET ~ 86.. 9//1 - I IH . - - PECK 1- -1- 2 1 r-L_, aU_L C---LJ-*- 1 2 2 3 LiLLI-7 1=2=11 i I - 1- J KET*HEN Â¢ Â¢ m -71-- E- - 1- U 1%Â»=i 243 eqft - & I -0 1 Al alli t -t j (-4~ 1,=EL I N i ,/1 t44 01 9.21 - fiT 1 RKI e - 1 (9 - BEDROOM 3 -4 K - -ARKERÂ©RAWINGNUMBER.R, <MAR~ER[RAWIN.NU-ER_R: _LI .MARKER..WING'lleER_Il â€¢MARKERSIEETNUMBER. R â€¢LISHEE....ER'. 1 -IN KER SHEEâ„¢UMIR. Râ€¢ - 531 947't - ~1 34-,, - - --- I ] r - -- 1/U/â€¢ --*14Â£6. 4 1635 94 ft 1 11â€ž L .-- 12 -Â¢ r 5 1/21.- r-L-iÂ» .2 / 4. .Flr, C NIblR 2 - F 4MI .Â·r ROOM -O- 1 â€¢ I.%.I .......LOC~ 1 TV 6193* Aeo â€¢IrreRE~n-,rta == â„¢U~*elili.... --R~a lf;. 2 [~t .~11 24.0.W - f =*-ORATED'. 0- liA 2 ---*M /1â„¢ E- . .4 -U* -L--222- 12 .TI ./.A S " If. 2 + 4 ID) T! -1-- 1Â·- I - < |~ ageâ‚¬OM-2 ~ 1 1 6 ~- 1 1 W 9' I <D) 40 6 ' I ill .=3422*. _11Â£4/ 1265â‚¬ft _ &-31 - I' 6 4, ~ \ MATINS AREA - OFFICE/STUDY ,-3*0,4 ....R E,4â„¢/ROOF 4 esq ft EMDRI'll/NUMBet_R> ~* AR....1......_R> . '4*KER'.WINGNUMBER R> i . "â€¢-/â‚¬/BRA~@GNOMBER Re .WINGNUM.E._R. - --â€¢*AlÂ·!Â·,IRIF4,4h"JIBER A #RKERSHEr.UMBE~_R,/f v 4 . 1. <1. ARKERSHEETNUMBER.R> I *RKERS~EETNUMBER_0 P -L- La / ~| Â«ARKERSHECNuMDER_Râ€¢ SHEETNUI,li_0|1 -. I '+ E-~1.. Al'ERS'EEâ„¢UMBER R. 1.841 saft 4 4 h P _ 'IC 1- 1 â„¢ARKE~DRAWINGNUMBERÂ» + ~ .p u , 4.,~20.Ed-0. -A-~MI)RAWINGNI 4%.. - .-IKE:HUNA.IN*UMBERÂ» .MARKERSHEET./.81(~1 <MARKERSHEETNUMBIRFA ~ <MARKERSHEETNUUeÂ¢RFA .. 0 .Le 0 U ' 1-21/2 , MAIN LEVEL FAR- PROPOSED UPPER LEVEL FAR- PROPOSED CC A: E Â·41, SCALE 3'16Â·' = - Â·0 LOWER LEVEL FAR- PROPOSED VICTORIAN CALCULATIONS SCA.E 3 16 LOFNER LEVEL eROSS 1 841 SF (X 5%) - q 2 SF MAIN LEVEL 6ROSS (531+635) 11 66 SF UPPER LEVEL GROSS (549+ 126) 615 SF INTERIOR FAR 1 933 SF MAIN LEVEL DECKS FRONT PORCH 43 SF(EXEMPT) UPPER LEVEL DECKS 245SF (EXEMPT) GARAGE 5 20 SF (-375 EXEMPTION) 145 SF TOTAL PROPOSED FAR 1 933+145- 2015 SF ~T. T T. 1 1 1,1 ~~r#lk LÂ· '-; 1 FF andl-4 NOOK KE66 I 0 0 0 6 0 0 06 0 0 :15 2'0 51/40 6-5~.. ,(9 - 0 9 9 03 0 9-0 3 1 '. 1 0 -/ 1 1 LOAER N OOp AT GARAGE --~. W I 1 1 - N h 1 ZIN MEDIA VOCM - - -- GARAGE -al : :,CI) 1-'-' '' 7 ~~'~ ~ ~"~"I- GOVEREP Â· 0 4 L ............ -- 072J ./.LOSUR' AM S -79-- --f ,1 11 3C ... .&13 . 47.1.1 : - -N AN EQUPMENT | | 1 CABINETS ' \- fa==fl . rE-,Â·--Il MASTER SUITE ~ 3 N 0 I ...TS .... 1 '9' I :/ F.\1 1 T 1 U-LAUND. 1 4 (16 i 3 -71 ..0-1 11 . 114.10 .1-MAR 'LAS' MECHANICAL ,< rn MUD ROOM 1 1 - STORIel ' 1, - - e.,054.1 - N 4*11 mENCH 'V Â® 1%=17 a -11-1 65 0 , 1/11111/ Â· ' F- 1 Kifjljt 7 nALL , r & h,14 111.1.~ ' rHHÂ«14+4-1 'EE10â€ž4 4- e -. 22828 1 ' r-Heit Al - -j ......0 BE *OWTSME L+211mb .7~--143 i , - nesr,~ 1- -RAIrÂ£-40 -OPLANS I L 1111 1 I ll f l 1â€ž n A It'I 11111111, 111111111! INDICATED BÂ¥ THESE DRAW~NGS AND p ""1-4 ~ " 1 BUTLER'S .CPYRIGHT OF KIM RAYMOND ARCHITECTS IC 3 PANTRYÂ· ~ 6 8 0 5â‚¬ ft I ~ AND SH,LL NErrHER BE USED ON ANY OTHER WORK F -1 3 -2 ANÂ¥ DIMENSIONAL DISCRE... NC~ BE UGEDBYANÂ·r OTHER PERSONFOR ANÂ¥USE e. 2. DECLK ' OVER SCALED DÂ»â‚¬gIONS AN[) S~ALLSE VERIFIED ' WITTEN ...SIONS SHUL TAKE PRECEDENCE 14 - I I ARCHITECT-ORTC,co-â‚¬NCE-NTOâ€¢WORK -A:7 218 9.q, ft _-1 I I -- - 1 I liLi 1/2 .1/.... 1.-4 0/4. . i~r 1 IIci./ i I j Ze) It ART.... 0~2. 1 L FAM ROOM J ---7 .25â€¢ li BEDROOM 4 .4 1-1 7 ~ 7 v 1~ 6-1 i 9 9 I - ) . 1 U [33 Ft] ~ i U L CE 1 I ~6-Il AND,0,41;PER ........ ' 1 5 -IÂ· 3 11, 4 9 *1/ â€¢ 1 2/41 â€ž Â·r k t-- - I 1 1 BEDROOM 2 ~ BEDROOM 9 2 0....-ATED.# 1 . F A UVINS 11 1 0 * 1 - ~-14 F 913 1 hit/1 C t h 1 - 1 .. --1 1 111'111 1// i 1 I M T 1 11 - . 1 I WHATIOEVE' WITHOUT WRITTEN PERISSION 1 C 17 -- 0 1 - 1 L 1 - ~ @ DINING ~ 1 1 - i- 2 1~47 1 1 * 970 - 0 , 1 Â® 1: 0 i -1-@-1@*=.*a--1-1 8, 2 1=1 ta Â· ENIfil le'ROM i - 1,464 sq ft ~ ...f 4 5 64 ft 1 In 5-â€¢ 1/4- *5 1,2 14-Â·* 1/2- 5 1,'~2~â€ž 1.-4 1/1. 5 2'- 2,300 54 ft I Â® 1 00 0 0 6 0 3 6 6 LOWER LEVEL FAR- PROPOSED MAIN LEVEL FAR- PROPOSED UPPER LEVEL FAR- PROPOSED DATE ISSUE 1 8 4 SCHEMATIC SCALE VIE = 1 0 SCALE 3 -6 St.ALE /'e z -9 MODERN CALCULATIONS LOREE LEVEL GROSS 2300 SF (X 4 596) - 103.5SF MAIN LEVEL GROSS 1456SF UPPER LEVEL GROSS 680 SF INTERIOR FAR 2239.5SF Scale AS NOTED MAIN LEVEL DECKS: . THE ABOVE DIMENSION DOE. FRONT PORCH 45 SF(EXEMPT) NOT MEASURE ONE INCH (â€¢-, EXACTLY ..S */ING I. HA. E BEEN ENLARGED OR REDUCED AFFECTINGALL .BELE'SCALES UPPER LEVEL PECKS 21 8 SF (EXEMPT) GARAeE 5-17 eF (-315 EXEMPTION) 202 SF Al.2 TOTAL PROPOSED FAR 2239 5+202 - 2441.5 SF Pkille J 'i' FF' and TV INV11VH AA OES NOILVAON3kl NVIHODIA 13381S INÂ¥11Â¥H M 0â‚¬9 00 'N3dSV Nhl3aOIAI 0390dOk:Id -SNOI1Â¥ln01Â¥0 MV=I . . . 0 .S Em ....10/ f c.'1~19Â·rolic eMICI ADDITION TC BE =EvaiSâ€¢â€¢Er|-c â€¢EMAil rCUMAI~|CEMO~eâ€¢412 8 ~ 9 99 8 DEMOUSâ€¢â€¢Em|-2 V*14 1 i i | i -TO'EMAIN ErSTING BRICK OMMNEÂ¥ i 16; EXISTING 8,1" 6,â€¢iMNEY 1/ ks' TO~EMAN -LILLILÂ«LILLLE~ ~ >0/ il 1 1 STANDING SEAM E N ExISTING e~EEN METI- ROOF ~ ~ TO BE REPLACED AITH ZING EXS/10 9%,/ ANDSOFFIT 1 1 1 -6//=.---..... 1 | 2/1/TING FAS' A ./. - *7 'OFFIT TO ./HALN E'<IST~NMINCOr,Tâ€¢,MTOâ€¢EMA~--It~~ A'Ap - 0:9 111 1-/% ....'-1111 Ill 11111111111111111 1>.-\]111111111111111 - UPPER LEVE. PLY I ExIST+16 .000 SIP[Ne 9 6 *D TRiM UP 'EMA~N - EM <h ExÂ·STING nOID /1/Ne ANO ]EmE)mb*g~Â« O 1 El ExiSTING AIND/ri TRIM TO REMAIN T.!M TO.EMAINE;~ET----1!1~ 0~!9!00~~4;22221 1 /1 .SIGNS ICE. I. ANGEMENTS AND PtANS INDICATED BY YHESE DRAWINGS AND SPECIFICATIONS ARE TIE PROPERTÂ¥ AND ax'Te,/ /000 F.om"E/3.E __---- COPY'GHT OF KI' RAYMOND ....ECTS IC RANSOM ANC) FRONT PaCH - 1 AND S,k' NErâ„¢ERBE USED 0, ANY ODE'-. â„¢ M PETA LS TO'EMA:N NOR BE UGED 8Â¥ A~ 0â„¢ER PERSON ..*USE WHATSOEVER WITHO- WRITTEN PER..ON WRITTEN O.ENSIONS SHALL TAKE PRECEDENCE SOUTH EXISTING WEST EXISTING OvER SCALEDDÂ»+ENSICÂ»~SAND SH,â€¢,1-LeE~â‚¬mFED AT THE SITE SHALL SE BROUG,47 TO THE KnEWT,06 OF â„¢E ARCH~ECTPAORTOCC-â‚¬NCE~NTOFW- SCALE 1/8 1'-0 SCALE 1/ 1Â·.0- %,pÂ©.m~â€¢'-~.- - 9 + 9 9 ...... -oIl .â€¢leT O%1 â€¢O=1Â·rio~ Tc mi ' DE.&16-ED , 1 W&*r/|52-JL!$25 1 . I ExISTINGGREENMETA. *030# 1 TOBEREPLACE[PNITH ZNG 1 1.91 1 - ST"O Ne SEAM BER ~ Exigi6396.A â€¢NO 1 I'lllIlill I...41Â©r- EXSTINICM, CHIMNEY- - 1 18 IF 90"TTO REMAIN -/441**41*ELABL E~!ST 46 .iNpon TRIM TO BE REMOVED 001- EXISTING BALCONâ€¢f E./T /6 ~400/ 5.1/6 1 ......TO ./MAN 1 1 ..STINISIDE..... Ex STING /LITIES TO ~ i El , TOEBE~EMOVED-- ~ I~ O - EXISTINI UTILIT:ES TO DATE ISSUE 1 BE im.OCITED 9 18Â·14 SCHEMATIC 1 i EXISTING I I , - BUL<HEAD / 1 COALCAUTE NORTH EXISTING EAST EXISTING SCALE 1/8 1'-0 SCALE 1/8~ 1.0 Scale AS NOTED F T.E +O,E 'IMENS'ON DOES NOT MEASURE ONE INCH ilÂ· EXACTLY TIS DRAWING V,MLL HAv E BEEN ENLARGED O. REDUCED A~ECTING.1 LABELEOSCALES A 1.3 *tted 0,1 11515 INV11VH M OES NOI1VAON 3kl NVIHO.DIA 13381S INV-11Â¥H M OES 00 'N3dSV SNOI1VA313 9NI1SIX3 . 35'4 3/4 60 004 0 1 L- MEDIA ROCM A/V EQUIPMENT'-I I f 1 CABINETS |â€¢~ LAUNDRY U MES.HANICAL ~/1 1 34,4,1 STORAGE - 2 0 &-I 7-11 EF-111.1 1 6 11\\111, r- -r-:11 Ntttl~-) 5- 10 3/4' - -i'Vid i - ' aj. L 1. I. i. 1- f. I 10 / 231- ~ L :ii:ii,i FROSTE' OL.-61 i i i il Fi T ~> 1,11,11111 - 1 k:*9Â»2 I SLASS RAILIT ST// 0 9,4/)*~ \ 3 li , CE==3=- . =4 j fo .0 14-4 1/2 3 1/2~â€ž 13'-4 1/4 3 1/2 'n FAMILY ROOM BEDROOM 4 , ibl m ct~ ~ f t, 5'-5 1/4 1 - ~ ~ BATH AND FORDER |PRESGE R ~PE 4â‚¬I. 6. 9 //2\11 1 11 K V MILL I 1 9 Ra BEDROOM 2 IL K ' g Ld 7 BEDROOM s 1 0 9 4 & . KIKI -1-1 r-C__1 [_3 -1 2 :/ 44/ ./ i,- 1 CLpX/*AEâ‚¬ 0,;r./0.8, .U 3 1/2 ~ 5'-4 1/4 ,~3 1/2 14-4 1/2 31/4 13'-4 1/4 3 1 /2~ 8 35-5 348 (B' 0 . 0 , C %!2/9 Z , 001 = I :892 * â‚¬ Â» 530 W HALLAM 4- m - m ULA 9 8 Fs VICTORIAN RENOVATION 191 0.- al' 1 liqu li.'Urim Ivillillillilill -EÂ¥~m Â¥1 N 530 W HALLAM STREET zc . -- .WII +59 Â¤ 8 2,90..190"0. . 1./. ./-- A -8 2.~ ASPEN, CO NgENUHZ LOWER LEVEL FLOOR PLAN-MOD I2905g%"kR tel 970-925-2252 email kim@krai.us til.idild J,Lw.KimRaymondArchitects.com ././ l *-,b ffÂ» C/~ â‚¬ .tÂ·/Gb-.G 1 :/1 Gff ../â‚¬ en# 'f.=/ G -EnÂ¢f ...â‚¬ 1.-' ffÂ· 2/~ E 78'-3 1/2 .l -.02 Fp and-TY Â»14*Bl~ 1-IV. Al 1Â¥os 0313@trl TIV 9,â€¢,]13b WO 039BVIN' .SOEVER WITHOUr WRI ARRANGE JAÂ¥/ 1 . 9/r/l 0 0 9 1/2 21 -5 1/2. (/IR 5 1/ff) 6-5 1/2 f~-5 -- /j L- 0 4 P // 1 1 1 GARAGE =Ig COVERED ~ POROH Ul %9 1 0 . i -1 I F ' 1 SPORTSGEAR I STORAGE MUD ROOM 'i- 8 Â¢ 1 1 1 4,1 -* 366< 1 dil 1 1 , & - I: - POADER [ L _1_I 1 I_! LI -1 W - 11 11'lit/ 0 --------- 11-1 lilli.1 1 J J U.1 26 :2:7 :O - 0< F *A~ OF AP-L ANCEE -0 IR-.ALL FLFFE- 14 E m 402 g N KI-AMEN . i 0 -8 qi h -[I-EF 4 B A- , 15-9 $ r 1 3'-b- U C Al. E-Foll' 6./.*r- 9 p/-JAA-mc, st-1 1 = ' 2/-111,7 4 1 1 LIVING . r r--1 - - L Â·Â· 7 ENTRY PORCH 0 2 0 0 5 . .... I CIO .0 I Â» 530 W HALLAM 8*2%%!1095*~ 2 M 0 82 VICTORIAN RENOVATION 4:1113!1'Z i i: Al N 530 W HALLAM STREET 11;Â¥ 42,11 -- 0 R Ir/2 0 121/08=R': -- a~~~a*A zg K 1 1 ===61 1 0 0 Si:g ASPEN, CO :,90-=':90.0 1- 04-/r !264$44Â·D www.KimRaymondArchitects.com MAIN LEVEL FLOOR PLAN - MOD 7~~~Rigk tel 970-925-2252 email kim@krai.us WINIP- L I i. ./.d C3Dwv-N ITECT P~OR TOI S3,VOS C3136Â¥1 Uâ€¢ 5 10'-6 1/4- 5 1/2 w< 5 ~ /2.f., e 1 OFSIGNS I. A.F ARRAIN-I NS TH ROPEli 0 8 48 8 8 : n LOFNER 9-OOF AT GARAGE 21'-5 1/2 7 1 - 1- -- FROSTED 6.40 ENCLOSURE All 1 ~ /1 39"-~ 4.4 5,2 < 51/2Â·~Â£[ 11-1 -/7- 9 1/7, 18-3/4 1.-7 MASTER SUITE 4/ D O GLE*RSLASE ENKLOS DRE F 9Aor,ER FP BENCI TV 11 " 1- 8 'i\Ililli' = FIREBOX TO BE ON OUTSCE OF /ALL I drl 1.1.11 ? l 1 U L 11 1 1-1 .1 1 U 11111111 01 1 11'111'11 DECK . - 0 0 2 0 0 5 e . a@=00111*31, â‚¬ 0 R p# 42*Ag:E. cp 1> 530 W HALLAM : M M.ih . r ZIEJ 0 0 5 0 VICTORIAN RENOVATION N i m # AWII M *26 m M 530 W HALLAM STREET 4 =tz U CD 14. ASPEN, CO VT- %#1' K I 2ZiL 42,2 ./-- UPPER LEVEL FLOOR PLAN -MOD .:60/9*IREER tel 970-925-2252 email kim@krai.us 14111233H www.KimRaymondArchitects.com 5 1// if '-,1- 5 1/2-ff I . ' JO ./.018 00}38 40 03/Â¥VlN I ARRINGF- a 3 NO~d & 1, . 00 000 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 FLAT 1 ROOF 1 1 1 1 r-----4-------------- ------------1--1 --------------------------- 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 --- 1 1 1 el 1 1 1 1 1 Â¥ 1 8 FLAT ROOF FLAT ROOF FLAT ~ /12 12 12Â·12/r ROOF 00 000 . Â» -& 0 . O 530 W HALLAM 111 81113 I 0,02./.... 43 * 4 : .m 2 m 50 VICTORIAN RENOVATION %%%*13112=: i!1Â§12!@2%0 1 5 *g*Imi .- .i AWII N 11:1111% i m 2 530 W HALLAM STREET 6:/ 0 N .EM ASPEN, CO /'ll i- ROOF PLAN - MOD .#4,000. tel 970-925-2252 email kim@krai.us www.KimRaymondArchitects.com 21â€¢806*2â€¢ZE NITTEN 41 9/ 6 3/ Pallqd 1Â¥JS 03139.1 Â¥ t;Nii.03:uÂ¥ Il OF*NS Â¢(*. AMRANGFI* ]3WI yO 039 1,11â€¢Â·13 0 ?. 4%34 =PT DO- - -----------1 1 . f . 34 11 . \ li lli 1 111 /~1 ~ I il~ ~ 1111 111 1 1 11121 i'11/1--- 9/ 1 -3 =fTE'~----11-J~11 123~'~i|' fl- - 14 0 (01- " 11 11,1 IM' lili 11 1 -1 0 1. b --9 (ZÂ» -3 00- - W) t- .4 / (3)- - . 530 W HALLAM 2Ier- i F i Hiwi N -2.Zi n & b VICTORIAN RENOVATION .Be4O4&~ 1 I m==Se .S â‚¬ 530 W HALLAM STREET P...... 0 ASPEN, CO SOUTH AND WEST ELEVATION -MOD 14?jj* K 1 * 543,2 www.KirnRaymondArchitects.corn a_ .,4555 tel 9/0-925-2252 ernail kit-n@krai.us .09 " 9WF 31VDS .0 " - .91â‚¬ 31VDS NOI1VA313 HlnOS CIOIN NOI1VA313 1S3M r===TI BASS: 31Va CO>-- lili 11 - J =1 X -0 ... 4 .It, 1 k i./.'I 'r ia= - ' 23 2 Ill 111 1111-111 . (3Â» -1 1 Id liLi 11 > 1 1 11~11 11 lilli 11 3 1 LL 0Â»-Â» ----6 1 -8 . GÂ»- 1 1 11,11 1 1-1 ~ 4 ~ ff---I--3 - kj - k 111 9- 1 . (3Â» -1 III CEÂ»-- 4 5 r rE T k-- 1 i jb W HALLA~M 1.11 1 1 1 87& U 9%029mp~it A,~ -0 0/8 G VICTORIAN RENOVATION p .:Pa 20~:# Fi : '..25:2.4 m ..fiT -Â£5~ Â·'- u -I 530 W HALLAM STREET K 1 55*'/EURgot limlillill : -- #Ef: ASPEN, CO 4/21963%55 /'ll a- te~EE#i:11. www.KimRayrnondArchitects.corn NORTH AND EAST ELEVATION - MOD i34834~KiiÂ£ tel 9/0-925-2252 email kil-nâ‚¬ukrai.us NOI1VA313 H.LMON DOIN NOI1VA313 1SV3 . . . 0 . N Lit') N N *32 N 0.1 M O 9 3 + 4 | | | | F INDICATED BÂ¥ THESE DRAWINGS AND 29 -41/2 Al 1 nESIG. ICE. ARRANGEMENTS AN.3 'ANS SPECIFICATIONS ARE TIE PROPERTY AND c...GHT O. I. ..... ....... IC 1 | | AND S,*t ...... USED./ANY O./. WORK N~ BE USED BÂ¥ AN~ OTHER PIERSON FOR ANY USE 1 1 1 1 v.MATSC>EvER wITâ€¢,0- w,â€¢irTE' PER-ssioN WR,TTEN {*ENSIONS SMAL' TUE PRECEDE,Â«DE OVER SC,~ED Oaâ‚¬~SICNS AND 5â€¢,AU DE ./FIED 1 | AT THE 'TE ANY D-ENSIONAL -CREPANCÂ¥ Â· ARCIrrECTPRICRTIC..ENCE-ITC>FIC,1/ C~ 24'-8' 1 1 1 W I 11 11 11 1 111 1111 lili 11 111 111] 1 1111111 111 111111 lill i 11 11 ., 1 11]1111]111 lilli lilli 1 .1 111 11 111'1111111.111111111.11 11 dilll I I lili 111 11 1111'11 1 :,i; 111 1 lilli 111 lili 1 1 1 11 1 I ]I'lllII'Illl lillII Il I Ill' Ill Ililil .Ill ' I H Il I I 11! 11111 1 1 11 11 li li 1111 1111 l illi ll 11 1' 111 lilli 111 k i:lili 11 1 111111!11 1 1 L-III'/ \\ 21'- Â¥ /.I' _]L_1111 IL_H 11. Il l ili Il lip I lll 1111Ill lili 11 11 lill i : 111 lilliÂ·li l i 11 El'111111 1 11 1 II Il Il N - T I III- I I Hil ii li ii 1 Unll Il I HIll I I]MIl I El H.' 0!iN C! I I Ill] Il N Il I T 111[1111.1 1 I lilil: tl 1111 11 11 lili 11 MIll 111) 111 1 111 11 1 11111111'll 1111 \ 1 1.7 liliN! 11,1111/1. 11111111 111 - 1 1.]Ill :I Il'Ill[ IlillI Ill 1 VUL' 2'd Â®i'JI'li!|I'i~' I~ 1 1 11 1 1 11 4 11 H 32 1 66.1111!34'lf'%%yL-%41#dedVI~L J .1 4 2 1 T j UW ] 11'J,J - 3 . Uh'i]21[luU-~41*IP 1],L - - IJ j]! iÂ·,iil Ill MIHI HUIL II lil i Ill NHHI lili HIll 1 lili 11~Illiliâ€žirlitri ill:.11-ITIFY'---14-]blullitirriVIPHIVIL/ -111'IVI 11 1 111'1 FIT fl. - 1 1 * MASTER \ CLOSET BEDROOM 3 1 -" I - 11 1- 2 UPPER LEVEL LIVING DINING 6AR.AeE ROOM ROOM 11 1 -,=42=4 :,2- = C*f \ 1 - 0.1 0.0 5 i -2 11 1 ~1 - f~ 1 - - C-O IL) 1 MAINLEVEL 4440 1 MAIN LEVEL 9#11 4444} 1 - 9 i / lili # / 1 j :, Ill/# hir BEDROOM 2 _a FAMILY ROOM / MEDIA ROOM 11 1f ' i 1 - ' DATE ISSUE 11-\ V./ -3 LOAER LEVEL ~ I 9 811 SCHEMA 1 LORER LEVEL V) AM-SECTION 1/4" = 1'-0" Scale AS NOTED r THE MOVE /'61Elilli DIES NOT MEASURE ONE INCH ilÂ·, EXACTU, THIS C,â„¢VING WILL HAVE BEEN ENtARGED OR REDUCEr A.rECTING ALL ./.ELED SCALES AM 3.5 Pblled Or 11515 LUOD-Sloal!43-ivpUOLLI/leuLU snÂ·ie-IMÂ©LUIM lieu, a DOIN - NOI1339 NOI1VAON 3kl NVIH 011 A INÂ¥11VH M OES 13381S INÂ¥11Â¥H M O 00'N3dSV 26'- 11 1 /4~ f 3 1&*CLE 5'-6 3 1/ 13'-1 8.(f) 3 1 i: 1<4 ---1 0 9: N.,1 \ 1 d. /0 â‚¬ I â‚¬34 /1 - LE' 142 \ Cl 1 3 4 El El. Â·Â·r- -- b -1.2~*057-Er ILA.: 3 ~ AT INC - BEDROOM ~ 9 Id 11 4 KI W =13 1 - MECHANIgAL 't , LAUNDRY 2 2 / juli 1 - 11 1.1 1 7 1--1 CLOSET tud- 9 -- 4*f1..:zzj J - 00~ . Â¥Â¥ I 1.1 Il 0/ BEDROOM 3 -- <MARKERDRAWINGNUMBER R> x~ <MARKERSHEETNUMBER R, 22 -=2 - + 3 1/2 ,* 1 2Â·-0' 5 5 1/2- Â·. ./ 1 9-1/2Â· ~~.93 1/2- /....// 2 : Q- FAMI-Â¥ ROOM / \144 ~D ~~Â»Itt_R [j IT= M =ESSER P 4 m BEDROOM 2 1 MVINGNUMBeft- R> ~ ,/ 1 MBER R> -A .bÂ·-4 3/4-4 /1 Ill Â·HEETNUMBER_RA ~ // / \ ~ <LARKERSHEETNUM~ER R> 8'-1/4 <MARKE=kINAWINGNUMIBER R> 4 <MARKERSHEETNUMBER001 :1:61 0 .0 4:*Hfug:Â§22 = u 1 0:8/2 9 . > 530 W HALLAM 2/Im // I IC:/1.- . m r iii! 1 , 5.9... 0 1 0 VICTORIAN RENOVATION m - ~895'"%922~i~ 331,244- A 23%5 0 3 i M -- AWII 0 18*ti . a 123:*.1,0-=8 530 W HALLAM STREET . 2:00.Eigigo@ ASPEN, CO El .*.1.....E .... -- 990.1.12:P=:2 K I LOWER LEVEL FLOOR PLAN- VIC tel 970-925-2252 email kim(Wkrai.us www.KimRaymondArchitects.corn ['tg MOCNI ffÂ·C/1 6 w SS ENCLOSED r. T. T, T--T -T. 1 -1,-1 = T+1 THE 1 .//1 6-.IC 03138 11Vâ„¢,1 m 00 0 -=1 L- 9 0 / - 1 1 / 1 f---- 1 17Â»J Lu'lles â€¢UN[-lowure j MUI:~ ROOM / .Nce 1 | .....9 â€¢NI I -1 - PORDER :t ~ '.-- 'TA-.4.e - - - KITCHEN -- 11 = n 13-6 - AL = <44R~ER[,RAWINE NUMBER R Â· ~RKE RSHEE-NUMBER R 11 3/41~-f 1 - r 5 1/2., 24-5 3/4 5 1/2".. In FF - -CL E 3~ 41 10 I D NING.1 1 0/IN TO A.OVE -- REMOVE ExtÂ·INe ra</ 1 1 TV LIVING , ADD INTENUESTING 6--EEL ~ -i .....ES i N vOLUME AS C ETC,+SIC SLASS CR' ERFORâ€¢-ED 9-L \ 37 ---EUCIT- 9/4 3... i I ./ OFF= LE / S.U.I â€¢EOVE E 4TRY SEâ€¢'INC AREA 1 -- /0 1 /7\ (63 , 1 1 _ 51/224 5 1/2-, 0 F DRCH 0,=al ine AREA - 1-El-1 1 E-31 1., -C- 4*IRKER]RAWINGNUMBR R> -ly--r-+ARMERDRAn4NGNLMBER R> Â»AARKERSHEETNUMBER R> ~ % ~ c4 ARKERSHEETNUMBER R> T Â«11-224/~2 05 - LINE Or C.<TE"R 1 Â·'MA DFUWINGNUIN<R R > 3 3[A r'*1-1- 40~lE <MARKERSHEETNUMB~914 U 1:' 43. r : 9 FA"041 .//02"59Â·1/2 E 530 W HALLAM m 13 : m E..g=*C,%2:0 %%EÂ¥Â§*~*2Â¥Z* 5 0 VICTORIAN RENOVATION 112Â§18'int:. N :mit 05 /54 A~ ' 530 W HALLAM STREET Â¥%*%*2*%;It~ ~ m,0 apg)...ma 4 m.9.-'ll. - 0.-8 ASPEN, CO â€¢2.ZE,SER MAIN LEVEL FLOOR PLAN- VIC Â§:Ii! ~~i~di cm,:2=c:=11,1'~~unUCT.us 22'-4 3/4 31'-4 3/4 4'-1 3/4~ 5 1/2,~, 24*-2 Li & ILJ1Mn U- r ELI 1., 1 2-ff UU -MI S 31,0Sa3138~11Â¥DN:10. E T. PROPERTY eGO 0 EOOF OVERIANG BELOA 1.-fl 1 :F=q' 11 -il / â€¢ ' I~ ....... i........A- /2 1- 1 FREE STAIÂ¢L Ne 1 n 1 Tue 0. I STEAM 9/0/ER '. 1 0 l 14 O < CLEAR ~ SLASS ENCLOD'JEE 3 r 4 0 r - 11 Â¥ 5 1/2~ . E'-0" , 1 0- GIl Ill re VIASTER SUITE Â· rl 20-6 1/7 - . -O 910â‚¬06*6 Fl~EP.AGE.. TV 152 11Â« PECK .//, --4 E=-E= Qi / -- F= ==- / 1 1 1 -4:3-Â» har 1 / 1 <MARKERDRA~ONGNUMBER RÂ·Â· | <MARKERSHEETNUMBER Ri 1 - ILâ€¢59 3: EL./L OFFICE/ STUPÂ¥ L/r ER ENTRY ROOFI ARKERDRAWINGNUMBER R> - r-4 ARMERBRAWINGNUMBER R> -li :MARKERSHEETNUMBER R> <A ARKERSHEETNUMBER R> LMAHAINURAWINbAJMBER R, 0 0 <MARKERSHEETNUMBgR9~4 k 1,=8.- r ........0.-2 530 w HALLAM E..EÂ§ - 00:. co g VICTORIAN RENOVATION 8.!el./...2 231 3 *meÂ¥*2*mifil . m.:ize.2.-' AWII 530 W HALLAM STREET r,/02 0 N Â§i~~ ASPEN, CO 11// -- 9901./.0-1...5 UPPER LEVEL FLOOR & ROOF PLAN - VIC .â€¢M.- CO,n tel 970-925-2252 email kim@krai.us ~';Bidlis: wv./w.Kin-,RayrnondArchitects.corn ::i .// 1 L-1 L r Err W'En. tu veâ€¢,MI S31Â¥DS (]3139Â¥1 m (Il ]11Â¥rl]HIS n 9. 6 0 0 Illit- FLAT FLAT ROOF ROOF . 11|IL eli Â»31Â« / 1 . / 1 \ .FLAT / ROOF I 1 1 <MARKERDRA~NGNUMBER R> | <MARI<ERSHEEÂ¥~UMBER R> 91% / A--- C Rielblith~OOF - ff- / \ + l . / ' 2 12 -61.2- V.1.F 1DRAWINGNUMBER R> , i. â€ž, .,#..., 4.-Â·,v-, â€ž.-â€ž.u,-w-,1 R> CERSHEETNUMBER R> 4ARKERSHEETNUMBER R> <MARKERDRAWINGNUI~BER R> G 1.1.Â·.ni:Ir:011[[Tric BERgqi :TZ 71 0 2 0 99// i 530 W HALLAM 3*22**Â§ag= f M #14*182% NA</<,1 8 0 VICTORIAN RENOVATION 4400,4 N 2% 2=g~=esm==2 a 11 3 M 530 W HALLAM STREET *Ge=L"6.22 -- A1IIII ~ ASPEN, CO ESNE:Izi* 53 K , www.KimRaymondArchitects.com ROOF PLAN- VIC **3:89%~Zigi tel 970-925-2252 email kim@~krai.us Plotted Or; 1 15 15 S VOS /3139.1 "/9/44..... J 30)nOgy WO C]39,!rING 7 .ONIMVBo L- - 11 1 1 ~ 111111 O 11 11 -+ rA 1 11 111 â€žâ€žEF T" " 1 -:1 ~> L.Z." - b : 4 -I AZ .:*W :W 8885 :15 32 -1 I 0,1 : 3 q: 0: AZ : U m ..0, Ki *3 p 'ZON' Z. ./.7 Lr**1 =FIllIJ r Â· f Â« @Â» 1 ~ ~ lilli ~ I T ff/// I UJU 1 11.11 1- iff 6_61__11 19' I 111! r J 1 - 122]1 1\< \ 1 1,1 ;111\\ lilli ~1~ >\4\ 11 193 1 11 1 L // 1 1 11 1 1// 11 -1 r 2/r- ~--- --- - :P :4 1. UP I 4% 11, -r :* 40. 1,1 26 :6 & 8 64 =1 1 12 4-4 3,6Â·Â· B z 9 0 530 W HALLAM m w R VICTORIAN RENOVATION 41* 5 1/f = im ..... DIA -1 530 W HALLAM STREET -71Â£ ..... i . 4:%20 2 D2 -Ill holv. -1 3#IA ASPEN, CO .... 5.1 2/23*1 12* 2::22 K i NORTH AND EAST EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS - VIC ~ tel 9/0-925-2252 ernail kim@krai Ed. www.Kin-,RayrnondArchitects.corn .i} .L Â·9 Ljâ‚¬ 31\09 40: = '91 DIA NOI1VA313 1SÂ¥3 NOIiVA313 Hlk:I, E /Â·ST O ! 1 0 AND . . . 0 . J EE Rk J% OF "C C (11 og EN >7 &A EM ja 8 8 f f 1-1 . /.RA +GFU[ .r- A. I Al 1 9 1 + Al THES' r,AA,WI â€¢f Al -*~101,3 Al PI~OP F I ' AN' M .faBOSED{WA~Â¥0, .A js[De. I. ITIERPEâ€¢qsoN:., ... ~ jr ' :EVER 'T+10/T WRIT .. ... N -ENSIONS 3. TA r W%O- ID . NE~21NCETAN~Ne r ./Ir .... Cy SFAM ./OF ~ Ex~sT.6 5-1* 1 1-lili-Ii / 0 --F-1 :>-NE- Ta REMA:N i /314 Ex,ST,46 BRiC.Ic % 00Â«1 ~ 111 -rr IEÂ»,Al â€¢003 91.Na ~ ___ \ I ,~,COC LrtÂ·_-[ DE-4 ~ BUTT JOINT .MOOTâ€ž .\ b;STIN. **/ ANC / l 11 CHNNEY TO REMAN E.STING ..... M-%M j-Â£-'H ....000 lili'-E - ~7 -1 - PETA L TOREMAN \\ - 1111 -0 I -d_Â«1 .U>fEN- 'OUSIANS-I 1\\ I . ---- P. -111 2 1 ..JJ e_.Es ANDeTEE- ./../.IJ QAIL - )jm-E~-EvE---Â· 1 UPPE"E VEL PL 7 /' Z ED- 11 -- 1 , 0. 1 0 ./ ---= U h=== 1 ==- ---1*..9 - - -- - 7 -- 101 0 _ 1 *1.-IL,C. --- ~ -- ill ] )-diÂ·'f..- - I- 4 _-1222_2.Zz~~~~a-/ --------Â¥ta.-.PU==2=22=2=Eltzi E.1.-ING STONE 'OUNIA-iON-OBE QEBUILT'OMATOâ€¢4 EX!/-1/6 3,4"EvE' PLY 9./ qq 2 . 1 43 1 1 1 SOUTH ELEVATION WEST ELEVATION VIC SCALE 316Â·' = lLC' SCALE 316' a 1Â·.0' DATE ISSUE S' ale AS NOTED I MO.'E DIMENSION DÂ¢L 1/.T MEASUAE ONE INCH 1 ..ACTLY THIS DRAWING .Li HAvi PiEN ENLARIED 06 RE DU ~ Er Er-INO All ..LED' IES AV 3.10 '4 1-,VIou DIA - SNOI1VA313 MOIN31)(El 193M CINV HlAOS INV11VH AA OES NOI1VAON33 NVIHODIA 00'N3dSV 133H1S INV11VH M 0Â£9 2 3'- 1 0- 25Â·-5 3/4 1 44 1 Â·lifl~ Â·41\\ -3 ' ; .~*~Â» 44 0 U - 44 1 41 1- . 1 4% 001 0-7-7 4% Ill- '31/ 111 ~ ~ 1, ' **En -ICI 11 /#- r i Â· U1 -1-:4 1 1 9L -013 Nt m 11 44:>1*Â«< pa~n 1-* !11111 11 12%< Nkak"* 1 41=93/ 8) S E 530 W HALLAM 47"Ate - VICTORIAN RENOVATION . m illiiii? . #m.:2 6 0 i.15 0 f: m 530 W HALLAM STREET .- .WII &%232 0 ASPEN, CO 5:itte@*TE* 1111*20*Zi:; d'A /'ll -- ht.:49*' K I SECTION VIC ~~OmZ)g,olou. tel 970-925-2252 email kirÂ·TÂ·Â·1([0)krai.us www.KimRaymondArchitects.com NOI1O39 -AV lON SV ale'US .... . LOT SIZE. 9,000 SF ALLEÂ¥ LOT SIZE: 9,000 SF T T 9.-drot -1. P~OPE~Â·Pr.IN' . r--2. 1 1 /. r E: ST~â„¢ge : N l A I Â· 7 i -c fEMAN. 1/ PO,SiBLE ~2 'Ae. A-0~ Â· p...nAÂ·â€¢Â·~ M I 64'AGE ...09 32.MT.1 0 Lr 22-5 1/2 se...cr LINE ~ -h-es,DW -6-__---1-I-U--2------1 8 EN ==2 - .1 U >N 1 1 F=. ~ 4, 1 1 11 1 - f.-4 1 M i : 11 1 -- 2 11 e. 1 .1 1 i H i : 1 Eli 1 '., 1 22 7 1,9 1 9 al 1 411 1 1 11 INDICATED .Â¥ THESE DRAWINGS AND 11 11 ' 2 'clq. All DESIG,6 4.- ARRANGED.,ENTS AND PLANS 'PECIFICATIOâ€¢(S ARE 7- PROPERTY AND C..Gft OF K. R.Â¥MONO ./MIECTS ./ 6-31/3~ 9 If - T AND SI~UNEr,HER. WEED- ANY OT,~ER Â¥Â¥.ORK d | I- ' i /1 WRITTEN D~â‚¬NSIONS 81-L W~ PRECEDEhâ‚¬E 0 ' i i ~ | 5 OVER SCALED D-/IMS AN. S-1 GE 4-e 1 7 ARCHrTECT PRIOR TOCC~-ENCEMENT OFWORK AT THE SITE ANY DIMENSIONAL DISCREPANCY , s. Â·/2.rj;:s/4 31 2 | SHAL.L ZE BROUGHT TO â„¢E A'rTEhrTIC]h OP â„¢E 2 3/4'.Â·-+--,2122 ' h Â· ' ' """"" . 1 1 -L-=ZE 1 1 1 1 - 5 , m. a- 1 LI 1 1 1 El 11 J-Â·15Â·/â€¢- - 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1. 5-1 5-1 1 1 Â£ I ./1....O i.... ~ , 1 1 TO REMA: 1 , ' 1 1 1 1 1 1 3/.- i 11 L 1 1 J 1 f , _ _ 1 1 1 .... ./. elli ' 1%1 1 ~-Â·l/' 1 -1 -52 Eli ie *71 1 4 1 1/ . 1 |Te'. 5 LO lot==Ne b W->4\ ~ 4 bg EX'SING TREE # 7 , E r 01 \ 4 ! 3 / / TO V.AN 1 1 SETBACK.INE -ruatx - SETSACK .INE 0. 431-7 5-0 9 4 ,. . 44/ft -i #Mi .- 1 3 V -V D DATE ISSUE 29 401 9,I81â€¢ SCHEMATIC EX/T1N6 TREE /~~~ ExleT'NG â„¢EE 9. , 70 15 MIC SUBM 'AL 1 1 OUN T. em â€¢EMON<ED EXIST!/6 TREES , . 4231/1 P 4 /41 -ro'EMAIN 9 Ex'ST~Ne TRE~5-'F 430 /1 TO REMAIN - 0 Scale AS NOTED - HALLAM STREET rF THE ABOVE ./MENSION DOES NOT MEASURE ONE INCH /1Â·' EXACTer THIS ORAWING WILL HAVE BEEN ENLARGED OR MEDUCED AF.CTiNG ALL LABELE'SCALES 2 SITE PLAN 1 '8- = 1Â·.0- A 0.2 Pbned On 1/2615 200-0 ndArchitects.com snÂ·le-1>1Â©LU!>1 lietua 0390dONd-NÂ¥ld 31IS SIXTH STREET 3Nil *ih,3&21/ NOI1VAON3kl NVIH INV11VH M OE 133hI1S INÂ¥11VH R--Â¥ LINIE~~ BACKL NE I 00'N3dS 0 0 . 0 0 0 11 4 11 1 1 1 11 11 . 1 1 ' r--3 0 U 75=tp' - -- / i-Â£'~11 1 - - I. P -1- H U 1,5825Glft EVEÂ©*I 14 1 IP... r - 62 sq ft 0 -- 1 0 1 5Z - l 1 EN Z 31 1 1 1 - = 3 r- 4-3 2,2 94 sci ft ./ OFSIGNS I.AS ANAAN{*M~,TS; AND PLANN INDICATED ./ THESE DRAWINGS All ./.CIFICATIONS ARE TIE PROPE. TY AND C..GHT OF KIM RAYMOND ./MITECTS 'C AND 8--~ NEITHER. USED CÂ», ANÂ¥~4DER WOR~ NOA 88 USEDBY ANÂ¥ OTHER ~ERSON ~08 ANÂ¥ USE WHA.80EVER WITHOUT WRITTEN PERMISSION ./.EN D-/SIONS 9,wl TAKE PRECEDEg OVER ACALED D-ENSIONS AND SHAL, 85 VER,FED AT T. SITE ANY DIMENSICÂ»/4 DISCREPANCY ARCHIrECTPRIORTC,CO~ENCE~NTOFWORK 1 R.S.& -Â® i< 148 57 ft Z. 4-3 â‚¬33, 1 9><:8Â·~~~:.1 1 8 esq ft {kt}i[i:Â§54 , 5:RtRE <Â«Â·>X'*:i ,1. j-JUI~-~22-:I.?ZaÂ· j 13 -9.- , 8 0 0 0 MAIN LEVEL FAR- EXISTING UPPER LEVEL FAR- EXISTING SCALE 3'16 = 1 n SCALE 3 1â‚¬Â· - Â· Â·O LOMER LEVEL eROSS 101 SF (*2.596 - 11.-1 SF) MIAIN LEVEL dROSS 22 q4 SF 0 0 UPPER LEVEL GROSS 1582 SF DATE ISSUE MAIN LEVEL DECKS: FRONT PORCHES (EXEMPT) 20+86 106 SE , 50'-6' 98Â·4 SCHEMATI COVERED DECK AT SIDE 148 SF 26 I HPC SUBMITTAL UPPER LEVEL DECKS 62 SE ~ - r -- -- -- 7 t r- - 7 LOFNER LEVEL BASEMENT PERIMETER: TOTAL EXISTING FAR 11.7+2294+15 52 -38 93.7 SF 2(50'-6)+2(14-3 1/29= 12Â¢1'-7" 1 33:%=19 BASEMENT HEOHT - B'-0' 1'- 10" BASEMENT AALLS AREAâ€¢ 1036.7 SaFT FAMILY ROOM 4 3 - :-1 -la.1- U LOWER BEDROOM . 4 LOAER LEVEL BASEMENT EXPOSED: 1 L -1- 1 1 .1/00/ Scale AS NOTED Â»(ELL 1 L 312 11 4--r = --- ~ 101 54 ft -_-______ 14 1'-10)+2-3 1/29 -4'-4 1/2 ANDOR RELL EXPOSED HEIGHT - 6'-0" Not MEASURE ONE INCH (Â·Â· I h. 11204 DulENSION DOED BASEMENT IAIALLE EXPOSED - 26 Sa FT AEEN ENLARGED O. REDUCE[ EXACTLY mS DRAWING WILL HAv E AcFECT!~ALL ~A.hEISCALES EXPOSED 26 Sa FT / 1036.1 TOTAL . 2.5% EXPOSED A 1.0 LOWER LEVEL FAR- EXISTING SCALE 3 16Â· = 1 -0 Plotted On 1/26~ 15 611Â·le-1>~gi>LU C GZ'6-0Â£6 lol 9NllSIX3 - SNOIiÂ¥1A 1Â¥0 BV=I IAIV11VH M OES NOI.LVAON3kl NVIHO.DIA 133hI1S INV-11Â¥H M 089 03 'N)dSÂ¥ ,,C/l â‚¬-,t~i .... 11 212 1 MOD 1 MOD 1 A Â£12 1 Ir<, â‚¬1Â» 000 11*1 UÂ«fo =Â»rE I - 6i MUddull#91(-41 - I7T ~.i 1 1 1 1 1 ./.*.,4.- / 11 1 1 1 2 4 0 sq ft 37 6 eq f t 382 57 ft 2 40 54 ft 5 N 00 Â®Â® @ Â® 00 GÂ®Â® Â®00Â©0 0 0 SOUTH ELEVATION FAR NORTH ELEVATION FAR 4 -1 4 \ 3 I[)1/ATE[ ni DRAWâ€¢N GS AN[J . C " 1(Â·Ail<mb AR tiÂ·LF PROPERTÂ¥ ANC i.(Pâ„¢GHt OF KIM *ND ARCHrrECTS INC ANDS# ./HERBE USEDONA~YOâ„¢ERwOR' . NOR. U.Dall./.THEAPERSON'ORAN,USE . .....VER W.HOUT W.1./. PER'ISS.N I , m". D-/SJOIS SH.' TAKE .RECEDE-E . ' - .....1/NS AND S.ALL ....1.I A' 'UMENSI(>4/ DS'RE'AN'. '11' A"TENTION 'r . - 1 .M r---1 - =24449 - 1 I R I ------ 17=91 I 1 ~M 1 E=] C=EE171 1 0 1 823 94 ft ~ 42 54 ft ~ 44 54 ft ~ 42 sq ft 42 sci ft ~ 104 sq ft e Â© we Â® Â® EAST ELEVATION VIC FAR EAST ELEVATION MOD FAR VIC. BSMT TOTAL AREA 9 4 - 4 1-t _p 1 7 7--#-Hurk=r .1 L-1 0 0 290+2qO+823-831 = 2240 0 7 A EXPOSED VIC 40.42+44- 126 -- 126/2240.O.056 FACTOR CZE==2221Â¢Â«2Â» ,/Ae. ./. 1- 14=Q==~I~ fÂ«MT-~~ MOP BSMT TOTAL AREA R 49% IUI~--r-1[33~il I . 4 ..EMIC 876-382.704-109 - 2176 DATE ISSUE ' 4Â· " 'PC SUBM TIll 27 I .- I. EXPOSED MODS 42+42+42 - imrliti I tq*ImlEl'LI 3111Â«_0==j 12 6/21 -7 6 -0.057 FACTOR 126 --7-#Z~~7~~~T~~~r~----~â‚¬~~~~~:~EEUZE~-1 1 4:M~1 1 8 31 54 ft 1 11 2- 70 9~ sq f t ~ 41- ~ 1 Ul Scale AS NOTED !F THE .OVE ....IN ./ Â· NOT MEASURE ONE INCH <' EXACTLY TIS DRAWING WILL HAvl BEEN ENLARGED OF REDUCr W Â© e Â© Â® .CrEC'â€¢45 ALL LAaELED Sf AL EC WEST ELEVATION MOD FAR WEST ELEVATION VIC FAR 1.1 a PkilleÂ¢ 0 1,26 15 INÂ¥11Â¥H M OES NOI-LVAON 3kl NVIHODIA 133hI1S INÂ¥-11Â¥H M 089 00'N3dSV 11. 7 7 -97(1-0/ A l, SNOI1VA313 aEISOdOhid - SNOI1Vln01Â¥0 hIV:I 0 0 0 B 1,2-# 5 -I' 3 1.- 1 1/2. e G -EEEr/ .: . F=T 1 -OVER- O ~r-< 1 4 1 . 1 1 .RE=:1 - 1- 1.---~----, . I. I t./.'ll-.9..'I t--- 51 2-- FRE' STAHL*11, 6 1 --al i J.TU, lil 1 Dr _ -.. r~..1 'TEAM *.m Â¤ 11 1 . I ./AeD/NGU>~~2 i CLEAA 41 F .55 M I 7 622 64,~~ -2=fÂ¢:70.11 K *ARAGE r-Gr Â·Â· 1 BEPROOM 4 521 1 4.* 24 1 +- - 0 -1. 1 ----- L f -4 ju I TO 5-/8- .- 1 8670Â· 1,1 1 01 1.9[LU I LAUNPRY i r~ 00 4 cN FE C -1 f %*Y CA MASTER SMTE ; 1 0 - m / 2.-07 . 0 I Ul ' MECHANICAL Z MUD ROOM -32.-Â¥ -.....2 0 - > 1 -- 4 Tv 1 /2. I 7/1 2 1 r- - --1--1\ UTTTrl , r lilli-i m +:14 1 {14=N POrN[PER , L 11 11_111 1 2 UP 12 L i '11' I rM * I I COP,R,GHT OF KIM RAYMOND ARCHrrECTS ,[C /11it,tII *m 'lA 24*5 ANO S--L NEITHER BE UEED 04 ANY OTHER WORK p ' r-H +A-Wl : .~ OESIC.- 1(~A< ARRA~r4~4â„¢ AND MANS rlittittti Â· ,â€¢DICATED B. THESE DRAWINGS AND 5PECIFÂ¢CATIONS ARE THE PROPERTÂ¥ AND lilli 1 -J 61. -//0/ 1 1 111111111 -,-=449.6~44'1661-z--ic=0 ./.EN D-/SIONS S~~L TAKE PRECEDENCE C .~TBOEVER WITHO- WRITTEN PERMISSION -9! F L- OVEN SCAIED D-45~eNS AND SMAU aE Â¥EmFED 11 AT T. ANÂ¥ /11,(ENSICNAL DISCREPANCY 6 51.ALL . /OUGIT TO â„¢E ...... OF â„¢E *f ARCHnECT~-ORTOC-NCE-aCAVORK , 19057ft hi PATIO & 1 1 BEDROOM 3 . 1 lo PL ~ 5 014 94 f t _ ~ 5-3 I 10.9.%/9- I 7-=- 7 3(1 ./ 9871$ & 1 5 1/2- I 2.-5/4 1: â€ž I 635 sqft 1---- s â€žr,9. 134. __LWâ€¢,49 = r-1 Pint , 2 121 1-11 - \ 2-4 1 .1 I l FAMILÂ¥ ROOM OpeN To A.OVE 1 ===#Ast TV LIVING OPEN -0 BELOR D \ BATH 2 1-4 r ---â„¢U,8-//c,4-2 aCHE>.- 1 D OR--OmAT~ 076 I.. 3 -/ 4#/:... ,L ./4./. 114&291 :7 1 rE r 1 ~ BEDROOM 2 - 1 I _ reet LQIâ€¢LER ENTR- ... . -;.-Fbi 4 3 54 ft 0 -0 - - 2 y,Â·".Ii' 4 --171 1 2 sq ft 2 0 - 9 Fsl ~ MAU'$2 , ./.Cr , DATE ISSUE MAIN LEVEL FAR- PROPOSED UPPER LEVEL FAR- PROPOSED SCHEMATIC t HIC SUBMITTAL 'CALE 316 1 0 SCALE 3Â·167 = 1 'Â· LOWER LEVEL FAR- PROPOSED VICTORIAN CALCULATIONS SCALE 3 le 1.0 LOFNER LEVEL GROSS 1 4 12 SF (X 5.696) - 101 SF MAIN LEVEL eROSS (5 q 4+635) 12 2 q SF UPPER LEVEL GROSS 622 SF INTERIOR FAR 1 9 58 SF Scale AS NOTED MAIN LEVEL DECKS: 1, iHE ABOVE DIMENSION ./EL FRONT PORCH 43 SF (EXEMPT) NOT MEASURE ONE INCH , EXACTI TIS DRAWING WI" HAVE BEEN ENLARGED OR ..DUCE. A~~ECT]4GALL LABhED SCALES UPPER LEVEL DECKS 1 90 SF (EXEMPT) GARAGE 555 EF (-375 EXEMPTION) 1 80 SF - A 1.1 TOTAL PROPOSED FAR 1455+180- 2138 SF Pbtled On 1/26/15 .lAi-/ LUOD-9134)114 ,IVI-JUOL NVINO10IA 0390dOk:Id - SNOI1Vln01Â¥0 hIV:I lei>lgi)Lul>I Ilet-LID /SE 1,00. T INV11VH M OES NOI=LVAON 3kl NVIHODIA 133hI1S INÂ¥11Â¥H M 089 .INDO' 4 | Â·_1 U 00 'N3dSÂ¥ 91*u=. .... . (C /3.-1.....Elâ€¢16~all/ ,Â«STO~/1 APPITION Â·ro mE L )*Cl-CREMâ€¢14 TO~EMAIN~PH#= i 1Â® Â® 0 0 Ao'ITION-Cat~â€¢â€¢ls'*IC U 9 D~MCLISâ€¢â€¢Er~-I eMAI' I r 1 .- EXISTINI IR;CK CHIMNEÂ¥ TO fEMAIN C EXSTIN6 .ASCiA AND SOFFIT TO.EMAN El- /ffÂ«\ ./1/TING ..... INC ~ C%.E 2E SOFFIT TO RE./IN .I EXISTING'INCO,4 /'M TO gEMA!/ Em 0 UPPER LEVEL PLY W. 10. EXISTIN6 '4000 SIDING Ill ge 0 00 61] , /% M.-1. - 8 8 BBB -El- ElST- ExeTINe r,OOD SÂ©INSANED I ANO TRIM TO ~EMAIN TIM TO'UEMAÂ·N A ~2%% â„¢IM TO'EM'IN MIN_Elâ‚¬_P.Â·r Â® 1- - 9- P- iÂ®_ 771 Â· 1- lili L - All 'FRIGN!; IrVAS ARRANGFMFI,Irq AND PLANS INDICA1ED BY THESE ORAWINGS AND 1 1 11 1 SPECIFICATIONS ARE THE PROPERTY AND EXIST.............pl **1 COPY'GIT OF K,/ RAY... ..HITECTS INC TRANSOH ANE) mRONT PO~5â€¢4 AND) SHI,LLNErâ„¢ERBE 'SED ON ANÂ¥OTHER WORK NOR BE USED>BÂ¥ INV Oâ„¢ERPEASON IP ANV USE MI. PETA]LS TO V*IN WMATSOEVER WITHOUT WRITTEN PERMISSION *ITTEN 0-/SIOIS SMALL TAKE PRECEDENCE SOUTH EXISTING WEST EXISTING OVER SCALÂ£D D-/S). AND SMALL 81 VERIFID AT WE AN' D-NSI*. DISCREPANCÂ¥ SM~LL 82 8~OUG+11 ro â„¢f ATTE,mOh OF â„¢E ARCHmECT P~OR TO CCM-â„¢CEMENT OF WCQI( /(Alt 1 ~8Â· = 1-0 SCALE 1,8 = 1 -O % le//Lr.Â¥ Â® 0 0 0 6,0~ic â€¢Col'lo~ .C I. DE.O. 16â€¢â€¢es 0.-0.1~-ES EX,STIN' 6.EEN META- ~DOP TO BE RE/.ACE; NITâ€¢ Z NO 1 l I STANDINeSEAM 1 Fi L EXISTING â€¢*961* "0 JA. EXS'.6 ..u ./1/NEÂ¥ ---- _ -- ~ J 90.T TO REMA N LLS- 1 _ EXJST:NG BALIONÂ¥ EAST,46 /INCOIN TRIM TOREMAIN r -Nx 6600 TO BE ZE/OVED E xIST ING WOOD 91[7 Ne , Â· ANOT.IMT......IN //256111 --f - 5*IST.hieSIP. EXIST:22;~531:S - - - = 8 El @710 =~IMÂ® 1 0 TOBE REMOVED-\ X EXISTINI UTLITIES To DATE ISSUE BE HLOCATED 9 8 4 SCHEMATIC HPI SUBMITTA' - E.ISTING 1 1 L BUL<HEAD / COAL CHUTE NORTH EXISTING EAST EXISTING SCALE 1,8 1-0 SCALE 18' = 1'-0 Scale AS NOTED If THE ABOVE DIMENSION "4 NOT MEASURE ONE INCH (Â·Â·> EXACT'. THIS OR~.INKS WILL HAVE BEEN El'ARGED OR REDUCE. â€¢CCEC'lu.ELEDSCALES A 1.3 Pbtled On 1~26/15 LUOD'S SNOI1VA313 9NllSIX3 NOI1~NUJ tz~I.ll A 133h11S INV-1-1VH M 089 00'N3dSV R , 4 7 $ 6 en 01 8 ..4 - 0 1 4.< S rig hâ€¢ --im ) --1 I 11 1 , R mO Iz m 10 0 9/'"'* 04't--ri- i m m Ill - -Lt 3> . r JK - -- 42 --- r=-9 9 1 , ~.1 - lill- â€¢ 1 R~ LAMC 10-1 1 0 - *Ii 530 W HALLAM .2: m.me'.am. - 8 0 =a U 9 im VICTORIAN RENOVATION *339Â¥029=2~Z - O !:12% 1 5 , 5 *:Â¥22:ZEZ~~2 v - .WII 0%=!swis 9.f..... M. r - G -1 530 W HALLAM STREET 3.3_2 ASPEN, CO An,Imil /2/lill A- i~9~~"Ii;it K i www p.inlaâ„¢rnondAr-el-litects.com 3-D VIEWS X2~0&9&1*~ t el 9 /0- %32 5 -225 2 e mail k i rn 0-1-1 k ra 1 - i i Â·. Sd0133hll 3N 1311Â¥ AAN *311Â¥ â€ž.0Â·.L =.9MD 31VOS CORNER TREETOP VIEW 133hllS 3 H1 NA/\00 1'01-1.anS Od' S. ch: ' ... 1-1 1 .*,01/r .-Ill' I I b C 2 2 -5 1 : ,0 _bf . 1-4,04â€¢ m i 4 LOKER ROG- AT GAZASE 1 3 1 f ~- 0-- 92--2-2-t--- I 1 r . FAMILYROOM . ~~ ~~~~~2211/ 23 97 ft h I 3 *SE h 1 *-3 =211 C 0 1 3 12= 7 +167- 5.1.6 4*/1=tr T U r \ r In ..1/2--f !_1 12.-cr '.1.-7 i. 2=11 1 1 7 = A/V EQUIâ„¢tNT RET 84 11 - [===1 1 : ''-- '~ A ~ ~ ~ l l ~ ENCLO.~e Ar Al E r~~~_ ' a=41 MASTER SUITE ....: 4 6,4- LAUNPRY J Â¢ J I I 1-10\ . MECHANICAL 1 MUD ROOM , I CNCLOSURE 11 1 + Il j CLEAM *LA- RremAR 4 5 " || N 2 =11-1 1,6[ 3 1 W 11 - ee- â„¢ " ---- - --- 2~- - - -17 f= rn I In 8 / 34 -1, 11,â€¢111111 -- 1 84 - I Iâ€¢ l 1 I 11 8 >Al 1 1 ~ Il -LI lit 1 1.11 -- ieâ€¢ox To Be ONOUTSÂ©E I Il '\20 lidl I 1 1 m 11 'iril| 11' '" r. 7-,1,Uttti/--91 4 -'ALL LED / -- 2 I r-H +2 4. 44 1 i' 1 AH+H+41 Ll,1 U L, 114' Lit...1 1,4 2 1 1111111% Cj i U - 11*1111111 1111111111 1 1111111 1101 -7 9 = E _.70 SL~. FIL / R 6 . 39-3-- 1 1 1 ~ 110 94 ft 2&96 2 b . r i: 0 .PECIP,CATION 8 ARE THâ€¢ PROP E~ITÂ¥ AND All DFSIGNE 1.* ARRAâ€¢,Gn,FNT,; AND PIAN' AN. 5~~LL NEIDHE~ BE USED - ANÂ¥ O'DER WORM 01 . : ./.10/iw.... ~ ~ COPY./. OF KIM ..... ....ECIS IC NOR DE USEDeÂ¥ Awf Oâ„¢ERPEASONÂ®00? ANÂ¥USE WHATSOEVER WITHOUT ImTTEN PERMISSION g|E|| 4 -RSCALEDD-ENSIONS->SllÂ»Al-~-ED WRI.EN -NS,ONS M. TAKE *ECEDEIE /1/1 M k . THE SITE ANY /11.,ENS,ONAL DISCREPANCÂ¥ & 1 11 a SH.' nE BROUGH'r TO THE ATTE,rIO. Of â„¢E ART -66 ~ ~ ARCHTECTPRIOR TOCC-ENCEIENT"WORK 2 - A-1 T.-9 [-1 r r, 1< C 1 ~L _ BEDROOM 4 ~ KI-CHEN T i BA-H ANDFOADER -3 ~ I|| DININd ~ 11 t. B.Â· Â¥ 2 L Al â€že,~M 1 1 C 1 111 i 1 /. 1 7 14 11 1 BEPROOM 2 : 1] BEDROOM 9 ~ -â€¢=Fo"'reo *n- 1#1* I - 0 1 , ad 1 11 -fif 7- 2 /1 1 i - / 91.. - . T Â¢ 61_ ENTRr 1 4 r=-33-0 r 11 th , I FUEÂ»1 8 'h rucon 11 4 - LjNE C FRON D" D i 1 B 411111 ' L lIl I_Il' 1 4' M ~ MAI!Â© E--j 27 3 - 1 1 R OFFICE . I , . -11 62 sq ft . INDICATED b THESE DRAWINGS AND , I It 1 Â¢ A ENTRY PO'CH 1149qft 1,318 sci ft 3 1/2- 22.1 Â·/2 9 17# 13.4,/4 3 )/2 J~J~ I I I I 2,1 7 legft 44 44 LOWER LEVEL FAR- PROPOSED MAIN LEVEL FAR- PROPOSED UPPER LEVEL FAR- PROPOSED DATE ISSUE 1 8 Â·4 SCHEMATIC SCALE 3/16' = 1 -0' SCALE 3 16Â· = 1 SCALE 3 16Â· = 0Â· HPC SUBMITTAL MODERN CALCULATIONS LOAER LEVEL SROSS 217 7 SF (X 5 796)- 124 SF MAIN LEVEL GROSS 1373SF UPPER LEVEL GROSS 710 SF INTERIOR FAR 22 1 2 SF Scale AS NOTED MAIN LEVEL DECKS: 2.:;,a:"E FRONT PORCH 1465F (EXEMPT) ;r THE ABOVE /1/ENSION DIES NOT MEASURE ONE INCH / BOK PORCH <4 22 SF (EXEMPT) EXACTCr WS DRAWING V,ILL lt,UE eEâ‚¬N ENLARGED OR REDUCED .CRE'-IWALL~BhEOSCALH UPPER LEVEL DECKS 162SF (EXEMPT) BARAeE 5915F (-315 EXEMPTION) 2 2 2 SF Al.2 TOTAL PROPOSED) FAR 2212+222- 2434 SF Pkolled On 1'26/15 2 03 1/2' - bri-le-'MaÂ© 11'IM 111?Ul a S 26 0/6 1/1 lÂ·/ 1/4 ./ INÂ¥11VH M OES NOI1VAON 3H NVIHODIA 133hI1S INV11Â¥14 M 0Â£9 00'N3dSV 1 01 p U O lA-~ 1 2Â·.6 1/4 Nk:130OIAI 0390dOhld - SNOI1Vln01VO hIV=I 0 . 36'- 1 40 004 1$-101 0 f 01-6 : 7#VE ~0 111 1.1 - 7 FAMIL ROOM . 4 A/V EQUIPMENT A j -1// 1 RET BAR |â€¢~ LAUNPRY U MECHANICAL / STORAGE rr- , liFT-11 1 11 11 Â® 11\\11,1,1 r--Til# rt' 1 IT 6'-9 1/2- , 1 61 1.1.11. f I. 7 L 111 12 L' 1 U Â©*TEP GLASS, ~ IIAT â€¢Ir. lili"111 .1/1 8 1 12 ~L ||24 ' -i 4- 45=41 1 M TO SLAB ::fv l i ./ aq--04 13 lai 1 N 1 G m 11 0 1 1 El----- L---- - ... 6- - .=4. OFFICE - 1 4 0 : 5 3 1/211,_/ 13'-4 1 /4 3 1/21:, 1 --+ led 'm- 2 BEDROOM 4 2 , BA-H AND POADER U f 63/4 . CLE" GLAS' \ h 1 aRIERSER TV *a i\\\\--~ 1 BEDROOM 2 4 1 BEDROOM 3 11% m 9 1 ,-- gill Zlill CIXI 1-r 11 9.-1 A . L rt__1 L.3, ;0~ 1 @ 1 '0 rl 3 1 . 2~5~ 22'-1 1/2 3 1/2.14 13'-4 1/4 3 1/2-,~ --0 Â® 0 0 @ MERQI K -U ......$0:.2 29 * : 530 W HALLAM , p.*e 6 - m g /15"DE :%:i - bm & *em VICTORIAN RENOVATION 111*1**2 : N : iif z Ki: .9%494 - -- .WII li 530 W HALLAM STREET 3./0 0 - -- . 94 - ASPEN, CO .=2%*5=50 m ~~~ K-I LOWER LEVEL FLOOR PLAN-MOD tel 9/0-925-2252 pr-nail kirn@mkral.uh ~91~@1%;ijt www.KimRayrriondArchitects.corn 20"'ob;IzzzE 15.-3 1/4- ., 26Â·-0 1/7 11-6 1/4 42/1 1 .,/â‚¬-,9 fte/q Â¢ , i tile/ 1 G 11,/ 1 ,-â‚¬ 1 .en *f ..,en. ff.rn â‚¬ 12'-6 1/4 10'-11 1/4 DESK -OSTEP 'LASE MOONI 1-lilli SL /9/1 5'0 Pollold le. 11Â¥-Il MO 030~Â¥1N3 09Â¥3 ARDMIrECT MhORTOCO~â‚¬N t[Â¥A~ ARRANG-F ECIFIC IONS AR THE OPERTÂ¥ . 0 . . . f .ti ~ o, -,95 f ../6 4-,S ~ .t,/1 b-,92 ~ 4 6 0 INg .// 1 I -L 2(* f f f .// 1 4 -11 1 f f 8 -8 3 i ~ 9 3 L,.71 .9 -.bl ' n S I & i DESIG- IrEAS ARRANGEMEâ€¢Â·fs AND PLANS 0 INDICATED SY THESE ORAWI'GS AND L-__11 L - 161 ~ car,IGHT - KIM WID ...rrECTS .,c SPECIFICATIONS ARE â„¢E PROPERTY AND 10-462 4- 4 4 1 AND S-iNE,THERBE USED (Â»4 ANYOT,â‚¬R Â¥IK)RK I -/1 WHATSOEVER WITHOUT WRmEN PERMISSION . I). USEDBYA-OT#RPERSONFORA,r,uaE M ./TTEN ..IONS SMALL .~Â£ PRECEDENCE 0 4 7-- M . Â® AT TME SITE ANY DI12./.AL DaCREPI/Â¥ 11- 1 . I 31 m 6 \ L _1 - m OVER SCALED D-ENSIONS AND SHALL I VEGFED ~ z -CHITECT P.OR TOCC~aE.....OF.CRK Z I W . tul , ~ 0: 11.-1 2 r (p# % 3 71 I _ 4 - 7 UuuÂ«/ d /O I J \ / 1 101 4 1.1 / L_ 08 5 W- ~ 13'!9.0 1.lk/1 CasoloN, 66<le L G / 1 - e - e , 1 Ill ==Vt 1 3 16 /< 1 1 % - .1 - 9.A-M.5-'2-a r m 01 0 j 1 --1--1 tn, Z / 3 \ 1 I \1 m r, - I e 6 L f.1- - 01 k â‚¬ a G â‚¬1 @ ' ,/9 6-â‚¬ 9 10. 1 E| H _ % e 1 1,---,1 -Â« 1 8 M - + .*/G b-.4 1 64' & g .*/1 b-.01 11.5/ 1 G .2/1 4-19 '~ .0-.b ~~ .2/tb-,G ~.2/l 0-,9 'fic~, G .0-.9 1 9 DATE ISSUE 4 4 SCHEMA. HPC SUBMITTAL Scale AS NOTED 1/ DIE ABOVE /1/ENSION DOE_ NO~ MEASURE ONE INCH Â·Â· ExACTEÂ¥ DIS CR*NING Vi'ILL HA.E BEEN ENLARGED OR REDUCE. A~ECTINGALLLAB.GOSCALES AM 2.5 P ulted OIl 1,2(*15 JO 3Nll L U C ) ' 1 ' G l i cu l l.~ O 1 V 1 ) 2, ) 51 A CIOIN -NÂ¥ld BOO-I=I 13A31 NIVIN ,(1'le-IMA)u'liM Ilell-I,) 7 c, 2' 7 -SE h ()/6 ,..5 1/21 , 6.-5 1/2- .//9 L-,bt IN91-1VH M OES NOI1VAON3kl NVIHO13IA 133hI1S INÂ¥11Â¥H M 089 00'N3dSV COVERED 0 . 0 0 0 0 0 LOAER ROO~ AT GARAGE 22-51/2 I I .1 1 1 1 - I FROSTCD *LASS * C]E ENCLOSURE AT .1 5 - 12'-9 3 1/y.. 1 quo \ \ ./-7 MASTER SUITE O ) CLEA,#Skess | ENCLOSURUT | Mb.ER ./. CEn. PP 1 BENCH TV 11 1,1. 1 Â® "1\\1111, FIREBOX TO BE ON OUTSIDE iii v T C PLÂ¥ OF /ALL 7 Tim ti 1., i I r-1-1.~1-1.7:li- 1.-0 110.-3--LI L _LI 1 '-1 . L' 1.~'22 / 11 11111,[ .1/11 1 lili'11' Ull! t~ DECK Â© . @ 0 0 @ 0 0 .:76: 0 UV-90# 530 W HALLAM M-apts#a - 0 I m 'AC< **m VICTORIAN RENOVATION 8321*164 7% ..1- .WII Mgg 11 3 ~ - 530 W HALLAM STREET Mil&"141 . .... -- C) ASPEN, CO e:**1518 a KI 12!illi,31! w,A/w.KinR.,vt,iciricIA,chitects.corn UPPER LEVEL FLOOR PLAN -MOD .:5012Â§3'gil tel 970-92%-2252 ernail kirn@Dkral.Le, 0'- 9 1/2 *-6 3/4 15'-1/4-7 5 1/2'" 1-1/2 5 1/@ff 5 11 3/.* f 1~ E ~TANP<~ livs-lio~- WV'/3 143 RE T PROPER. 0 0 0 0 0 . --------------------- 1 1 1 FLAT ROOF ~ ---------------------------- rl H 0 e Â® FLAT ROOF FLAT ROOF FLAT *#1_2: 1.2- ----1- 12Â·12 ROOF @ . 0 0 0 0 0 0 ,â€¢ cP m. .- 0 R:go: 1 m:92*CiR:2 3:221 1 530 W HALLAM =2123@Bilp 1. M = figil Â£89. & **m VICTORIAN RENOVATION :h'04/1 "02= g Elm *â€¢&86:.5:. .- .WII N ./8- 11.0 m n 530 W HALLAM STREET ilÂ¥*~imi::1 fk I lilli 0 " ASPEN, CO 4~-340:=* ~ /9*38 +4hp.. -- 2/0 I: K 1 www- 1< in,RaynionciA rehitects.col -1 ROOF PLAN - MOD ~.EME*3*15% tel 9/0-925-2252 email kirn@kral.,1 Pbtled On 1 '26/15 ISN 3~'110 ARCHITE -CRTOCC-ENCE~NIOFWCRI All DEM 8 0 8 ' +C Rt dri 1.7 .r I : t m in r m r r g 0 - 0 8 8 25 -07 .... '' ILJ' 1 4- ~11%\ ~ lilli ~~ 1 .-I.I-. -I'- t> 1 01 Â® . ----1 I'' ' 1 1 11' 1 1 11 11 @ @ 1 lillillilli "1111 1 , ~23 f /4 @ 11~ @ 0 2.-I k e III'll'lili 111111111111 Ki>\ 1 e Â«NK e e .t . =1 9 - e 8 11- 0 I - 1 0 - e . mi * 0 Â·Â·U >'lili a 1 i010, 530 W HALLAM -48*Su Z 33/.& VICTORIAN RENOVATION 9 : C "im .- .WII 9:*:5 530 W HALLAM STREET 31*~*2*Â§*~ -- 9% X ASPEN. CO %3PiR08. 2 5/9....204 104 K SOUTH AND WEST ELEVATION -MOD 121**13*ES: wvv\/V I<[IMM,ivt,~c)11<1Af, 11,tectÂ·. 1 0/In EMAPKIÂ¥*MÂ·' tel 9/0-92Â»2252 ernail kirrielikrat ii. i Â£ 119-De 1, / 3-3VOS NOI1VA313 HlnOS 00nl NOI1VA313 1S3M 44*7 1 0 @ @ -i 1 OF 2 0 ~ 11111 111111 0 /11101- 11\1 23 ~ -1~- 0 0 24 -* 2 0 - e 0 0 l 1 111 . 0 m e m - 4 e - e 1 lilli e 1 e - 17-1,0111 'll LI~1 -2/ HA; 2 01 E .VI'l I. .... 5:9=, - - 1 m I Cr - jill':53,9 9 I o ul VICTORIAN RENOVATION r I CO 1:~ES>me==- - mid m g Pic 2-<'gs*k:zow k 'Arn 23%;U,sh"t~A: -- .WII e,imig.i... 530 W HALLAM STREET SE,E*-26*==* . I 2 -1190.11 W 'EM ASPEN, CO 1- ./-- 5/06_.Z;k:.1 NORTH AND EAST ELEVATION - MOD www- K i 111 1-lay ni ond A rch it ect s .corn tel 9/0-925-22!52 ernall kir-nâ‚¬Dkral.ll,. J.. = 19,1 31V)S NOI1Â¥A313 HlhION DOIN NOI1VA313 1SV3 i:3,76:::...OF tty 20'-11 1/' f 5 1/b-* 5'-6 3 1/2 15'- 1 4 mil 0.,4 I -/:r 1 C .1 w OV :9 3 * l.%.: : /1 LE-10 2 N =tz 8 'l R r, I 011 - .LE=NOSTE[ ILâ€¢63 AT,â€¢IC BEDROOM 4~ 2Â§ wil)' A - Ct 1 903 LAUNPRY INI /~MECHANICAL F - jr F- 3 1 1 A - / 1 962*ET 4 W Â£ 11-4 11 P J :T Â© W L KI i .21-11 . glail W KIR BEDROOM 3 ... M T O SLAB % 8 1-O L.LE]/ \ RAIM--2 [3 h \ / 3 1/2 ,< 1 3'-0. 5 51/2'-, 1 0-1/2 [3Â·731/= 01- u- FAMILY ROOM 4 Â® ED~BATH2L1 5 aut Xv' DREEISER r 4= 13 BEDROOM 2 L A 2% 1/4- /1:JIN 27 1 0 t 8 1 1-2 1/2Â· ~ 4 Â® 22-0 ~ e . 474: Fj 530 W HALLAM 44:*=*8 ' < lim & rmE' Ist e VICTORIAN RENOVATION Mi<Eig561*" . 5.22 1 :im Iii!/ilil d ..il AWII E 8 530 W HALLAM STREET - ASPEN, CO 11:*Ies=: .... i- 7/2 -58...:& K i www.Ki in RayrnondArchitects. c.or-n LOWER LEVEL FLOOR PLAN- VIC *~8209*0â€¢*si tel 9/C)-925-2252 er-nail kirn @Dkrai.il., 1-13Ivt f Â·*, e-' ft t/1 Â¢ .t,/ 1 01 -gig RS 91'EEL STAIRS LING GLASS ENCLOSED 10-1 1/4 f ~INDOINnELL~ â€¢0 03 . 26 . /. I pellqd 1. IONS RE â„¢E PROP-T 0 0 0 9 , -p // 1 1 / &0 1 1 ---J GARAGE 1 T.O. SLAB r 100Â·-O 21 4> ....002//*.E MUD ROOM I I :~9 ANC 1 11 ~1~1~1!~rl \1 1-1 1 1 ...TR rIALL OÂ· APPL ANCES POADER ' I rl-7.1' 17 ~ 1 - .- 0 IR- L I Il 1 LI L I 1 4 up 1 lillir 1 - KITCHEN PATIO 11 B h , 5-3 11-3 2' 108_/LI,--- 1,~ r - 5 1/2,, 14'-5 3/4 5 1/2-., 1 FP - JrL 4 --3 -3 A- /-2!MINâ‚¬11 L -11 OPENTO ./OVE - REMOVE EXISÂ·'146 FLO<â„¢ 1 1 TV LIVING , AC>DINTERESTINGS-EEL ~ _L_---- ....SES IN VOLUME Â® ACID ETCHED SLASS OR PERFORâ€¢TED S. 1- -CMT. 1 /. TO. FLY 97 100'-C ENTRÂ¥ rt 13'-01 51/2",, PORCH 1 I 1 LNE 'r EXTEROR y 4 .ALL./PIE , / 2/ 1 0 0 2 4 0 gij--2 ~0 f:iN Â® - 530 W HALLAM EN':. & am% VICTORIAN RENOVATION im/ge#%225 %11/3 4 i. %44 m 0,3.294 .- ..il .WII :im -=- m pi 530 W HALLAM STREET dilÂ·ill -- lor/Z ASPEN, CO 3 Ili "A:P MAIN LEVEL FLOOR PLAN- VIC g,S.i=,3a www. K i 11 7 R ay tno n ci A rch l tect s .corn 411;*Mii tel 970-925- 2252 prnail kirnmakrai.uÂ· 5 1/2 /aff 1 :SA, 1/ 1 3 /33' rrECTP~ORTOCCM~ENCEME Al ( DFRIG< '7 :RA- A 10 8 RE THE PROPERT 0 0 0 ROOF OVERHANG BELOA ~ FREE STA~-Ne 1 TUB ' ' 1 5/2/0 6/0/18/ 1 11 ~ ~ ~ *LASS ENCLOSURE CLEAR 0 r - 1 0 51/2-., 4 . U [4] Tn-2-6~~11 u---1 1: 1. 00 1 MASTER SUITE 22'-0- 6/9 0 . A mLÂ¥ &6:&47 11 42 TV - 1 - . 1= 7-- 11\\ CL 7 Til,wrÂ·tw I d-1-11,1 1 1 - L -1_i i u i -4 PECK lilli 1 Y 9 f I OPEN TO BELOO!/ @ -off k 7. / 1 / I fill I Â® Â® U:=6- 50 ; 0 E 901 1024:gu I 1 1~y k F Am . 530 W HALLAM m 0.-Â» & ....0 Pil;&62: f A VICTORIAN RENOVATION 2*%: 530 W HALLAM STREET lpFIrnÂ» -- A- A . 38 Â¥Â®3082Â£it - J- ASPEN, CO 1./. ill,- ;8. o 40'il@6133:, K UPPER LEVEL FLOOR & ROOF PLAN - VIC , dameâ€¢ 242* tel 9.70-925-2252 ernall kir-r,Cakral.,1 . www.1<iii-,Itay,-noridArchitects.corn 3HS' u. <TECTPR,ORTOCOD-ENC . 0 0 0 ZE)25E. FLAT FLAT ROOF ROOF ~1212 1214 4 .... Ill u. 73 /1 FLAT DECK ROOF BELOn 1. ORIGINAL ROOF 016 PLANEÂ· REPLACE MITH CLASS A / ~--- FIRE-RETAROANT f WOOD SHING!,re ~ 1~ER HFC / ~ 21% 1> /jfll @ . 12 12,/ 4\F VIF m -A V â‚¬ 0 0 * . %~%92*i>8;~E 8 12 2 530 W HALLAM . e 4 2 %Â§81 VICTORIAN RENOVATION i gol m z %%m 11./ N 5%*ME W 9 530 W HALLAM STREET U*25 M m M 2"02 1, El .il. AWII W ~/8 I ASPEN, CO 0,90-190% . ./-- 6*..S ~~H~4, K 1 *08* A 4 ",30 ROOF PLAN- VIC ~00Â§2**45% tel 9/0-925-2252 ornail kimâ‚¬Dkrai.,19 www.Ki in Ray nionc]Arc.hitects .corn 9,92/n '00 pe/,cld 039Â¥V~ 3 N339 31VO AR A-4â„¢ r : 3\-1 1 11111111 1 0 1111.- 1-1= -~ - 0 1. 2 Â£1 1 i 111'~inll . 0 0 1-/1 [ 29--0 2( T m m I 22 Ill-/ O -4 & r./.z . O 63 ..12/ 09 :g :% lirmi dij 9 1: cul,mm -,in; 4% ZI lilli /0/' 7. i IiriF-017 9 ----- I . NA 44\ 1 ~ Â»r b @ 1/ 1 lillil lilli.1 r f 4/ UW lilli 4 6'-11 1/4. 6 2 1 1223 \ Â«3223\ ~ & 0 0 1 - l 1 11-1 . J _r fi #S iar M U, -4 26 82 Z I 0 81 40 0 0 m 8 e r I . rn I -O 530 W HALLAM ~0:01Â£223~51 m.. 4*m VICTORIAN RENOVATION .2,2/=2qi.- el T c :*m 5 R 530 W HALLAM STREET 1-:S=.im: .2 7. C 920@ . .... ./-- A ASPEN. CO 95-S 5.L . 40*1 903'1'@iiig K 1 NORTH AND EAST EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS - VIC ,9~~Emt*~<~, www.Kirri Ravt-nondArchitects.corn 2*5&Â¥252: tâ‚¬.19/0-925-2252 ernail kir,-,@1-Jkrai.lts DIA NOI.LVA313 19Â¥3 NOI1VA313 HlhION DETAIL 5.~IN ANPIN' 21 Hi dz 8 152 8 Cal Ag* :82 .4 21/ 'i# lit &.P 6 009 6% < < I if: Ac# m . 1 . r 11111111111 , :, , â€ž :u 11 1'.~~-~-A G e 11 1 li 111-11-1, 0 It- i ~--_11 I Ill'PIE *EI Â° ' I grE-~---TT-31 11111111'111'Ii,Ff'/>7 0// MY i I 2/5 3 1:IT "P r r T|li | -~v----'~~ 14'EE' 1 0 0 .I Â« 0 0 0 -l-1-13-11 4 Gis <R 8 I. I Â» 43 4 3 . 52 ~2#9-4=IQ_m.jc_~_ li -- i Â® | r, *3 9 N C U) n -1 m Cr- m ' Il 1 11-1 ' 5 Z 0 3 2--7 .12/. 0 6 . +ArAL_, AJ Â« lil 1 2% 1#l @ Jiff @ UJ Â»- 4- aay ':2: B g 222 @gis 928.2. r r :mi F Z I Z I I . m...0 I Imi&: u.5 u < 4 5 3 6 G -'. 4:-12<2%65 530 W HALLAM 343&,+23%. ~ f=& 5,48~65i~~o CO VICTORIAN RENOVATION :11"lim~-I UY/~*asuR -- A- E C 530 W HALLAM STREET 43 ASPEN, CO All/ -- r HU,Â§02 & *%*t K 1 SOUTH AND WEST EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS - VIC 219*WV" ' www.Ki,AR:,yinondArchitectÂ·. corn 13.EM&Â¥*RE: Ipl 9/0-925-22'52 erna it kirnâ‚¬r,)1<ral i i. 3ASS, 31 , 9' r 31'~3ts NOI1VA313 HlnOS NE. ZINCITAN./6 672Â¢T Â·Â© Dal.d u ..INGAULABELEDSCUES %* 80 039- N 3 43 3 ITECT-OR . IGNA -1FAR ARRA.I. .... . J Em 8k 32 . CO E 7 =-L 9-i-- =- 1---- J=i.'* -*/-*- 31[667 li t 20 ""&74 -ar L/'1=mr- . -+Jrl ------ -- - .L IESIGNS IDEAS AR-NGEMENTSAND PLANS INDICATED 8Â¥ ~HESE DRAWINGS AND SPECIFICATrONS ARE THE PROPERTY ANO @ 1 COPYRIGHT OF KIM RAYMOND ARCHITECTS INC AND) SHALL NEITHER BE USED ONANYOTHER 'ORK NOR BE USED BY ANY OTHER PERSON FORAN'r USE WHATEER .THOUT IRINEN PERMISSION URITTEN DIMENSIONS S-Ll TAKE PRECEDENCE OVER SCALED DIMENSIONS AND SHALL BE VER]/ED S.ALL BE BROUGHT TO THE ATTENTION O. TIE AT THE SITE ANY DIMENSIONAL DISCREPANCY ARCHITLer PRK),R TOCOMMENCEh,6NT OF .ORK 5TH AVE VIEW 3/8" = 1'-0" F. . 4 % . -r --~/- e - 1, .. Ill - 1.2 4. i .. ..: I. v U ...FA----~4.6,~~91...........9 \- - ./ *alli Zill//8/5/ $// \ 1,6 0 . 471 1 â€ž.....2mz -Ei-71 - . .1-VI.-Â«., . -~ --- --- - ' DATE ISSUE - --I--98-....-lin- .al 9/18/14 SCHEMATIC 1/26/15 HPC SUBM]TTAL . --11 - R . 11 -i-- 11 - ScaleÂ· AS NOTED DIRECT VIEW HALLAM 3/8" 1' 0" ~~~ IF ThE ABOVE DIMENSION DIES - NOT BuRE ONE JhIC~ (iv BEEN ENLARGED OR REDUCED EXACTLY. â„¢IS DRAWING WILL HAVE AFFECnNGALLLABELEDSCALES CORNER OF 5TH & HALLAM 3/8" = 1'-0" AV 9.2 Plotted Ori 127/15 !6=)-jviuZ05110 SMBIA CIE SUIV-LS S/N 'NVINO]-OIA a3SIA3hl 1 11 't INÂ¥11Â¥H M ES NOIJMAON3kl N7O10'A 133hllS INÂ¥11VH M 0Â£9 00 'N3dSV 0 0 0 0 0 -4 --J L 4.0 / + -0- /,9 2 1///2 1 1 / 1 I. ./ ROOF OVERHANG BELOW M Z.G. 4 1- / 1 k. /0. / 1 / 1 -- - r %--1 =C 1 / - FREE STANCF 3 . V % . L 3 TuB ~ U- .0 , CLEAR ' ' STEAM SHOWER ~ At' 0 .r 1 . 0 0 Oc Rj G,ASS ENCLOSURE JO --0 Â· 11 D | _th~RbsTED GLASS . GARAGE 7 F , 1 ATIC * V: BEDROOM 4 1 =w 0 ---------m----Ul Z, i 61 1 -= > 7 C A 14 1 1 100'-0- I 74 1 ~ A 0 TO. SLAB Lt 11 2--1 7 Ill--1 1 1/11 .00 - 1 . BE 3 FIFT-Il I H * CUBBIES || 33 4 LAUNDRY C.U-E I MASTER SUITE - r O INDICATED BY THESE DRAWINGS AND 22'4Â» SPECIFICATIONS ARE TME PROPERTY AND MUD ROOM COPYRIGHT OF IUM RAYMO~ ARCIÂ«TECTS INC, A~ SHA,1 NEITHER AE USED ON ANY OTHER WORK ECHANICAL X U, GAS MT.O. ru v NOR eE USED BÂ¥ ANY OTHER PERSON FOR AMY USE FIREPLACE.4 U 110'-2 .R[TTE' 0110ENSIONS S)~ALL TAKE PRECEDENCE .YHATSOEVER WITHOUT WRITTEN PERMISS$ON 7 ........0 1 1'-7" STEEL SURROUND OVER SCALED 01*NSIONSAN' SI~L BE VE~FIED | BENCH v TV AT THE ~TE. ANY /~MENSIONU DISCREPANCY - 1 11 -Er--- 1-- 1 -ZE.~ SHALL aE BROUG}IT TO THE ATTENTION OF THE 1 - I ARC~TEC[ PRJORTOCO-ENCE* -L__ ~ POWDER . UP DN CLOSET 1244 - ial ~=gk= R lul | DECK CE m r--1 /1.1 & 1 1 , 1 r-.- .7 --7- 7:=:=En PANTRY V,rAL OFAPPLL_NCES C Z 3/2%1--i - LJ -1 -Cle n N Â© -7 -1- KITCHEN - 1 L._. 1 3 4 CO 1 L._.3 1 u R .2 13~16--2. 8 1 LI 393 e 00 & E PA'no ~ ~00-6 BEDROOM 3 - 8: Z E k LU . 41 - El , ' r. I 6-8 1/2 15411/2 .2'-10 3/4- I PI 1 T.O. SLAB - ---4 :t= 1 r-- - 3 r 89-0 51/2--, 24'-5 3/4- 51/2",, BATH 3 m ,- ,Â· FP - -EL 31,2- ., 13Â·-4" - | - I. , /7 1 2 2 -1 10 ~ I 21*~91 .1 F OPEN TO ABOVE FAMILY ROOM | RE.ovE ExisTING Floom -1-T- UYING ADD INTERESTING STEEL W OPEN TO BELOW -- TRUSSES IN VOLUME DATE ISSUE -1-1 ~ BATH 2 5 G SCHEMATIC @ LJD \~ | ACID ETCHED GLASS ..5 HPC SUBMITTAL @ OR PERFORATED STL + =1403 -~ 1 &| r. T.O. PLY ENTRY , 30-8 3/4" . , - DRESSER - i ./ 100'-O. 2 4= . i J b 1 01 - | 5 1/2 ,, 13'-0 i 51/2- " BEDROOM 2 | Â· Scale: AS NOTED 1 z PORCH LOWER ENTRY ROOF ~ L IF THE ABI'E DIMENSION DIES BEEN ENLARGED CR WEDUCED NOT ~â€¢EASURE ONE !NCH [ E.CrLY THIS DRAWING WI. *" 1 + h AFIECTING.L LABLED SCALES /1 8'-1/4 ~ , 8 \ I 6% P.ill.q . LOWER LEVELFLOORBLAN 1/4" 'JÂ·,6 '-oÂ· MAIN LEVEL FLOOR 5LAN WALL ABWA 1/4" = 1'-O" Â® UP FER LE v#-11 Â®/4" = 1'-0" 0 AV 9.3 LINE OF EXTERIOR ~ Eg Plotted On 12715 STORAGE EL STAIRS 5'-6' ASS ENCL ED V VH M ES NOI1VAON3kl NÂ¥(70-'DIA 3hl19 INÂ¥11VH M 089 00'N3dSV MIV-LS S/N aBSIABM M @Nld 2313 NVINO.LOIA a3SIA3h1 . r---~,a'z-~ w: ~1/719- i 6 ~ AN 1 3 20-0 AFFIDAVIT OF PUBLIC NOTICE REQUIRED BY SECTION 26.304.060 (E), ASPEN LAND USE CODE ADDRESS OF PROPERTY: 4 30 W 1-\ALL*-7 , Aspen, CO SCHEDULED PUBLIC HEARING DATE: JA A. 1 6 , 2015 STATE OF COLORADO ) ) SS. County of Pitkin ) 1, /61 Â»1 12/~/ PHOnp (name, please print) being or representing an Applicant to t e City of Aspen, Colorado, hereby personally certify that 1 have complied with the public notice requirements of Section 26.304.060 (E) ofthe Aspen Land Use Code in the following manner: Publication of notice: By the publication in the legal notice section of an official paper or a paper of general circulation in the City of Aspen at least fifteen (15) days prior to the public hearing. A copy of the publication is attached hereto. ~ Posting of notice: By posting of notice, which form was obtained from the Community Development Department, which was made of suitable, waterproof materials, which was not less than twenty-two (22) inches wide and twenty-six (26) inches high, and which was composed of letters not less than one inch in height. Said notice was posted at least fifteen (15) days prior to the public hearing on the /7 day of ..3 4-1/~1 , 20 , to and including the date and time ofthepublichearing. Aphotographoftheposted notice (sign) is attached hereto. ~ Mailing of notice. By the mailing of a notice obtained from the Community Development Department, which contains the information described in Section 26.304.060(E)(2) of the Aspen Land Use Code. At least fifteen (15) days prior to the public hearing, notice was hand delivered or mailed by first class postage prepaid U.S. mail to all owners of property within three hundred (300) feet of the property subject to the development application. The names and addresses of property owners shall be those on the current tax records of Pitkin County as they appeared no more than sixty (60) days prior to the date of the public hearing. A copy of the owners and governmental agencies so noticed is attached hereto. Neighborhood Outreach: Applicant attests that neighborhood outreach, summarized and attached, was conducted prior to the first public hearing as required in Section 26.304.035, Neighborhood Outreach. A copy of the neighborhood outreach summary, including the method of public notification and a copy of any documentation that was presented to the public is attached hereto. Ccontinued on next page) .. J A~4 1 9 2015 Mineral Estate Owner Notice. By the certified mailing of notice, return receipt requested, to affected mineral estate owners by at least thirty (30) days prior to the date scheduled for the initial public hearing on the application of development. The names and addresses of mineral estate owners shall be those on the current tax records of Pitkin County. At a minimum, Subdivisions, SPAs or PUDs that create more than one lot, new Planned Unit Developments, and new Specially Planned Areas. are subject to this notice requirement. Rezoning or text amendment. Whenever the official zoning district map is in any way to be changed or amended incidental to or as part of a general revision of this Title, or whenever the text of this Title is to be amended, whether such revision be made by repeal of this Title and enactment of a new land use regulation, or otherwise, the requirement of an accurate survey map or other sufficient legal description of, and the notice to and listing of names and addresses of owners of real property in the area of the proposed change shall be waived. However, the proposed zoning map shall be available for public inspection in the planning agency during all business hours for fifteen (15) days prior to the public hearing on such amendments. 4----~ c 7~~~hO, 0 Signatifre The foregoing "Affidavit of Notice" was acknowledged before ipe this I V diy , 20~ by K.Un RAN m ond | TERESA HUFFAKER HIRSCH 1 WITNESS MY HAND AND OFFICIAL SEAL NOTARY PUBUC STATE OF COLORADO A . Notary ID 20094021159 Myj clommission exbires: 1,Â· ,/1 1 I I Ill-9 ~ My EmEEM- 07/01/2017 1 r-- --- C '\3-Qi.,6.4 *iW Hiytj 146Gry'Public " Gl~ j ATTACHMENTS AS APPLICABLE: â€¢ COPY OF THE PUBLICATION â€¢ PHOTOGRAPH OF THE POSTED NOTICE (SIGN) â€¢ LIST OF THE OWNERS AND GOVERNMENTAL AGENCIES NOTICED BY MAIL â€¢ APPLICANT CERTIFICATION OF MINERAL ESTAE OWNERS NOTICE AS REQUIRED BY CRS Â§24-65.5-103.3 . 1 RECE JAN 1 b , CITY Of. 6 PUBLIC NOTICE Date: Wed., Jan. 28, 2015 Time 19:00 pÂ·m. Place: 130 S. Galena St., Aspen City Hll. Council Chambels Purpose: HPC will consider an application by 530 Hallam LLC, 0133 Prospector Lane, Ste. 4102B, Aspen, CO 81611, affecting this property. Applicant req_uefts apprpval to renovate and reposition_the historic structure_pn the_sitq, &_to_Sub-djvide th? lot fqr_tile _ construction_oftnew home_Aetback,_ floor-area_& design yarianges will_be._~ rgyteweÂ¢._C-ontact A*pern-Pla_ofÂ®g_ Deptat_970-429-2758. Fe, r 4*.*u.'!p W. 'Er/7.4 ' t #42?1,0 . . t 11.1. .24* .,-4 h.2 ..A .*%1'FLflf,L-, ai.d 1"9/I".* - : - 4||."10/"#W;1 :1.-, .... 4 pd ~ & U. I 94 40 t. ..Al.*tril *th2&.. p l.. 1 I,PÂ·:11 i.... iR'. â€¢4.2./* . -.Ul, .*.'14; U,NÂ»10Â· MN#Wuw'34,4, il =- I. 119/0/ Uâ€¢*0â€¢ 9/1/ ./ .'/ 1//ill, *~.' .--./E Iiodind Apimflm *./.0 45-: .40 1 " ' - -4 4 0-*Ki I OR I 'Dnd ./.Ill .u'll - 0 "r."IÂ»-p ....I-,/1 1 1 30llON Ol-18nd b k .......9,%-, y 0 U.K 2-2,44. . - - 16p I *-- 975*/F 7-"..p7/.4 - - 4.I -1 Crl I-. ~'~ - 0 1 Â» O Â°O 0~.: / , . f/./ - 1 6 \ \ fi ~ 1.1. ~ //---1- 42,4 - 2=1*,21=UU-=~ A. C. I , I. I. .1- r *-, 1 ... --L.....L.....L...L ./-/ / 318 FOURTH STREET LTD 323 N FIFTH ST LLC -501 WEST HALL-AM LLC PO BOX 445 555 KATIE PARK LN PO BOX 3389 HOUSTON, TX 77001 SNOWMASS, CO 81654 VAIL, CO 81658 601 W HALLAM LLC 602 WEST HALLAM LLC 624 WEST FRANCIS LLC 121 S GALENA ST #203 17130 AVE LE RIVAGE 0133 PROSPECTOR RD #4102 B ASPEN, CO 81611 BOCA RATON, FL 33496 ASPEN, CO 81611 ASPEN HISTORICAL SOCIETY BLAICH JANET S TRUST BLAICH ROBERT I TRUST 620 W BLEEKER ST 319 N FOURTH ST 319 N FOURTH ST ASPEN, CO 81611 ASPEN, CO 81611 ASPEN, CO 81611 BLUE MAGPIE LLC CITY OF ASPEN COLLETT JOHN & VIRGINIA C PO BOX 1268 130 S GALENA ST 1111 METROPOLITAN AVE #700 ASPEN, CO 81612 ASPEN, CO 81611 CHARLOTTE, NC 28204 COOK ROBERT C & MARSHA N DH HALLAM LLC EGGLESTON ROBERT H JR & TRACY H 621 W FRANCIS ST 2711 CENTERVILLE RD #400 434 W HALLAM ASPEN, CO 81611 WILMINGTON, DE 19808 ASPEN, CO 81611 FISCHER SISTIE GLENN SALLY RAE HENRY KRISTEN 442 W BLEEKER 504 W HALLAM AVE 525 W HALLAM ST ASPEN, CO 81611 ASPEN, CO 81611 ASPEN, CO 81611-1246 HILLMAN DORA B TRUST HILLMAN TATNALL L REV TRUST JONES STEPHEN M TRUST V 504 W BLEEKER 504 W BLEEKER ST 807 LAS CIMAS PKWY #370 ASPEN, CO 81611 ASPEN, CO 81611 AUSTIN, TX 78746 KAFRISSEN ARTHUR & CAROLE KEY R BRILL & ELIZABETH R LAWSON MICHELLE R 310 N 6TH ST 715 W MAIN #304 106 S MILL ST STE 202 ASPEN, CO 81611 ASPEN, CO 81611 ASPEN, CO 81611 LEVINE THEODORE A TRUST MAGGOS LAURA P MCCAUSLAND LINDA REV TRUST 425 E 58TH ST #25H 317 NORTH 4TH ST 609 W FRANCIS ST NEW YORK, NY 10022 ASPEN, CO 81611 ASPEN, CO 81611 MINERS CABIN LLC MOSS CHARLES B JR MUSSELMAN JAMES & JULIANNE 403 ALEXANDER RD 1530 BROADWAY 8401 N CENTRAL EXPRESSWAY #400 LENOIR CITY, TN 37772 NEW YORK, NY 10036 DALLAS, TX 75225 NATIONWIDE THEATRES CORP OXLEY DEBBY M 50% -6XLEY JOHN C TRUSTEE 50% 120 N ROBERTSON BLVD 1300 WILLIAMS TOWER I 1437 S BOULDER AVE #770 LOS ANGELES, CA 90048 TULSA, OK 74103 TULSA, OK 74119 PACIFIC DEVELOPMENT GROUP LLC PDT PARTNERS LLC PURPLE MAGPIE LLC C/O SALLY TISCHER 601 E HYMAN AVE PO BOX 1268 PO BOX 1804 ASPEN, CO 81611 ASPEN, CO 81612 HEALDSBRUG, CA 95448 SHAFROTH ASPEN HOUSE LLC SHELBY LLC SWANSON LUCIA TRUST 3367 SUNSHINE CANYON DR 1201 WILLIAMS ST #6 425 E 58TH ST #25H BOULDER, CO 80302 DENVER, CO 80218 NEW YORK, NY 10022 TISCHLER SALLY MANAGEMENT TRUST URIPIS LLC VES TRUST 50% PO BOX 1804 600 W FRANCIS SWEENEY JOHN F TRUST 50% HEALDSBURG, CA 95448 ASPEN, CO 81611 1260 IVANHOE ST DENVER, CO 80220 WARE NINA COULTER LIV TRUST WHITE MAGPIE LLC WILKE LIVING TRUST 13021 KING ARTHUR SPUR PO BOX 1268 626 W FRANCIS SAINT LOUSI, MO 68146 ASPEN, CO 81612 ASPEN, CO 81611 WOGAN WENDY 533 W FRANCIS ASPEN, CO 81611 0 . AFFIDAVIT OF PUBLIC NOTICE REQUIRED BY SECTION 26.304.060 (E), ASPEN LAND USE CODE ADDRESS OF PROPERTY: Â£80 w . th,UMM 9- , Aspen, CO SCHEDULED PUBLIC HEARING DATE: [A} ed < 6â€ž11 23 0R 5 ; 001'rn '10 j S- STATE OF COLORADO ) ) SS. County of Pitkin ) I, . 4*6-elk 66 - (name, please print) being or repfesenting an Applicant to the City of Aspen, Colorado, hereby personally certify that I have complied with the public notice requirements of Section 26.304.060 (E) of the Aspen Land Use Code in the following manner: Publication of notice: By the publication in the legal notice section of an official paper or a paper of general circulation in the City of Aspen at least fifteen (15) days prior to the public hearing. A copy of the publication is attached hereto. Posting of notice: By posting of notice, which form was obtained from the Community Development Department, which was made of suitable, waterproof materials, which was not less than twenty-two (22) inches wide and twenty-six (26) inches high, and which was composed of letters not less than one inch in height. Said notice was posted at least fifteen (15) days prior to the public heaing on the day of , 20 , to and including the date and time of the public hearing. A photograph of the posted notice (sign) is attached hereto. Mailing of notice. By the mailing of a notice obtained from the Community Development Department, which contains the information described in Section 26.304.060(E)(2) of the Aspen Land Use Code. At least fifteen (15) days prior to the public hearing, notice was hand delivered or mailed by first class postage prepaid U.S. mail to all owners of property within three hundred (300) feet of the 1 4 C : i. Property subject to the development application. The names and addresses of , proberty owners shall be those on the current tax records of Pitkin County as they ' appeared no more than sixty (60) days prior to the date of the public hearing. A ' copy of tile owners and governmental agencies so noticed is attached hereto. Neighborhood Outreach: Applicant attests that neighborhood outreach, summarized and attached, was conducted prior to the first public hearing as required in Section 26.304.035, Neighborhood Outreach. A copy of the neighborhood outreach sunimary, including the method of public notification and a copy ofany documentation that was presented to the public is attached hereto. (continued on next page) .. Mineral Estate Owner Notice. By the certified mailing of notice, return receipt requested, to affected mineral estate owners by at least thirty (30) days prior to the date scheduled for the initial public hearing on the application of development. The names and addresses of mineral estate owners shall be those on the current tax records of Pitkin County. At a minimum, Subdivisions, SPAs or PUDs that create more than one lot, new Planned Unit Developments, and new Specially Planned Areas, are subject to this notice requirement. Rezoning or text amendment. Whenever the official zoning district map is in any way to be changed or amended incidental to or as part o f a general revision o f this Title, or whenever the text o f this Title is to be amended, whether such revision be made by repeal of this Title and enactment of a new land use regulation, or otherwise, the requirement of an accurate survey map or other sufficient legal description of, and the notice to and listing of names and addresses of owners of real property in the area of the proposed change shall be waived. However, the proposed zoning map shall be available for public inspection in the planning agency during all business hours for fifteen (15) days prior to the public hearing on such amendments. Signature The foregoing "Affidavit of Notice" was acknowledged before me this %- day of .Â¢.U,Â«n , 2011, by .4.-r-7 Â£Â£01 - Sc-cÂ»-Â·Â·u--~ WITNESS MY HAND AND OFFICIAL SEAL My commission expires: 14 LE_-~ 1 l~ ~69 1.n 012 FAI~le,~~~~~0~ Notary Public KAREN REED PATTERSON NOTARY PUBLIC STATE OF COLORADO NOTARY ID #19964002767 ATTACHMENTS AS APPLICABLE: My Commission Expffs February 15, 2016 â€¢ COPY OF THE PUBLICATION â€¢ PHOTOGRAPH OF THE POSTED NOTICE (SIGN) â€¢ LIST OF THE OWNERS AND GOVERNMENTAL AGENCIES NOTICED BY MAIL â€¢ APPLICANT CERTIFICATION OF MINERAL ESTAE OWNERS NOTICE AS REQUIRED BY C.R.S. Â§24-65.5-103.3 PUBLIC NOnCE RE:530 W. HALLAM STREET- CONCEPTUAL MAJOR DEVELOPMENT, ON-SITE RELOCA- TION, HISTORIC LANDMARK LOT SPLIT AND VARIANCES NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that a public hearing will be held on Wednesday, January 28, 2015, at a meeting to begin at 5:00 p.m. before the Aspen Historic Preservation Commission, in Council Chambers, City Hall, 130 S. Galena St., Aspen to consider an application submitted by 530 Hallam LLC, 0133 Prospector Lane, Ste. 41028, Aspen, CO 81611. affecting the property at 530 W. Hallam, Lots K, L, and M, Block 28, City and Townsite of Aspen, Colorado, Parcel ID#2735-124Â·25-004. The applicant is requesting approval to renovate and reposition the historic structure on the site, and to subdivide the lot for the construction of a new home. Setback, floor area and design variances will be reviewed. For further information, contact Amy Simon at the City of Aspen Community De- velopment Department, 130 S. Galena St., Aspen, CO, (970) 429-2758, amy.simon @cityofaspen.com. S/Willis Pember Chair, Aspen Historic Preservation Commission Published in the Aspen Times on January 8, 2015 (10851293) .. ~r, ..S~.01.-4. 4 #Mi..#.15.7- 688 :i : milillilia,illpth#Rial#/1: Sh.; 0.44/: j. 9%*Be,/ 4.-:4 -161 -- 4~Â·'Â»4 4 .*. 45,9.4: I li X... Jusy. 1 / -I,-1 *~+ 1- / - g== -3~ N , .- , / . -- .Rh'>Uk.L h / - 1, - 4.24.6: T~~U;t, ,~2*11 -16'Fll - 1 7.64 t. 1-Â»1' - -f-Wm 1 .2 Iii ~ ..,5 ~p.. 9 ~ . 11.11 .. . 1.- ...... ... ' X:/1 , .1 Â· - Â¢77Â».99, ..ai , - 4. Ert â‚¬~.4.- 4, . .43, r''k Â· . . . ' 10 11 r , b tivei f , /4.-1 - ..O -- - d Â· 75 .- "-4- ie--27=~Inni-- - A p /47 #64 - ~' . - 1. 74 - 1 J.rUL rtialls. - Â« 9 , 1 4,1 ' 41(. 4/.1 4 - 4 3 r a Â· Â¥11 ..Â° -& 732&,* 3=Eftil A . - *42 -. <,--:--Ma 4 -/41-Lt.~Mi . ..t G '..t -2 -"F*t .- i,-ta..4 -49/43 -* 2 , '/ 81 9 - tÂ·>.r~~ -Â·Â·rd*cji:10â€žbt.Ny . , ~~~@~k.11Â·t.,;t:Le.. ,li~p'Â· 'Â·' *C k u e 1 4*k. 99*1 .4, I Â· .%<b~ f . 4.-â‚¬Â¢6273. - Ir, - =-1 - 3*910-, -r- 4 f Â· ' *&251~0.4. N - -*iyÂ«c.=2---*21'.fÂ·t,t'ell),11- 3.1,Â·)fl,-tit.te Xm =- - r,1 - 4 , Â© fu toi 0,326 f O. 1 V j .6 '1 1 j. , J. V -1.- /i.i 45, 4.,- .. RECEIVED OCT 1 5 2014 530 Hallam LLC CITY OF ASPEN c/o Aspen Starwood LLC COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT 0133 Prospector Rd. Suite 4102B Aspen, CO 81611/ aspenstarwood@gmail.corn September 15, 2014 City of Aspen Community Development Department 130 South Galena Street, Third Floor Aspen, CO 81611 Re: Authorization to Represent Dear Sir or Madam: 530 Hallam LLC, a Colorado limited liability company ("530 Hallam") is in the process of purchasing that certain real property located at the street address of 530 West Hallam Street, Aspen, CO 81611 (the "Property"). Aspen Starwood LLC is the Manager of 530 Hallam, whose phone number is 920-1280. We have authorized Kim of Kim Raymond Architects, Inc. to act as our representative with respect to all applications to be made with the City of Aspen (and its departments and agencies) regarding the Property. If you have any questions, please feel free to contact Kim at her office, located at 0133 Prospector Rd. Suite 4102X, Aspen, CO 81611 Very truly yours, 530 Hallam LLC A Colorado limited liability company Executed by its Manager, Aspen Starwood LLC Markf;udiand, Manager of Aspen Starwood LLC .. Aspen Starwood LLC 0133 Prospector Road, #4102B Aspen CO 81611 October 28, 2014 Amy Guthrie Aspen Historic Preservation Commission 130 South Galena Street Aspen, CO 81611 Re: 530 West Hallam Dear Amy: I am the Manager of Aspen Starwood LLC, which entity is the Manager of 530 Hallam LLC, a Colorado limited liability company that is under contract to purchase the property located at 530 Hpild-Beet Hallam, Aspen CO 81611. I'm writing to provide you with the consent of the undersigned owner to allow 530 Hallam LLC to process a land use application regarding the subject property. All costs and expenses associated with any such land use application shall be paid by 530 Hallam LLC and any such land use application shall be contingent upon the closing by 530 Hallam LLC of the purchase of the subject property. Very truly yours, Mark Friedland The undersigned owner of the subject property hereby agrees to allow contract purchaser 530 Hallam LLC to process a land use applications with the City of Aspen as described above. SHAFROTH ASPEN HOUSE LLC A Colorado limited liability company 514+) al j A'(AU,C i Sydney Maty, Managing iMember Date: October 2-, 2014 0 .- ALTA Commitment For Title Insurance VVESTCOR 1@dIA LAND TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY AUTHORIZED AGENT: PITKIN COUNTY TITLE, INC. 601 E. HOPKINS AVE. 3mFLOOR ASPEN, COLORADO 81611 970-925-1766-PHONE 970-925-6527-FAX 877-217-3158-TOLL FREE E-MAIL ADDRESS: TITLE MATTERS: CLOSING MATTERS: Tom Twitchell - (tomt@sopris.net) TJ Davis - (tjd@sopris.net) Nola Warnecke (nola@sopris.net) Joy Higens - (joy@sopris.net) Issued By ~ WESTCOR /a LAND TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY Home Office: 201 N New York Avenue, Suite 200 Winter Park, FL 32789 Telephone (407) 629-5842 .. ~<WESTCOR LAND TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY ALTA Commitment Form (6-17-06) COMMITMENT FOR TITLE INSURANCE ISSUED BY WESTCOR LAND TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY Westcor Land Title Insurance Company, a California Corporation,("Company"),for a valuable consideration, hereby commits to issue its policy or policies of title insurance, as identified in Schedule A, in favor of the Proposed Insured named in Schedule A, as owner or mortgagee of the estate or interest covered hereby in the land described or referred to in Schedule A, upon payment of the premiums and charges and compliance with the Requirements: all subject to the provisions of Schedule A and B and to the Conditions of this Commitment. This Commitment shall be effective only when the identity ofthe Proposed Insured and the amount of the policy or policies committed for have been inserted in Schedule A hereof by the Company. All liability and obligations under this Commitment shall cease and terminate within six (6) months after the Effective Date or when the policy or policies committed for shall issue, whichever first occurs, provided that the failure to issue such policy or policies is not the fault of the Company. The Company will provide a sample of the policy form upon request. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, WESTCOR LAND TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY has caused its corporate name and seal to be hereunto affixed and these presents to be signed infacsimile under authority ofits by-laws on the date shown in Schedule A. issued By: WESTCOR LAND TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY 014%133*. By: /40**5 00#24,4 N., *'CFÂ¢ Weitcnr #B, 1-Ind Title # m, jA-e>,ident ~:6 1.-nic 10,4 % 6. Comp,ny %" *h-*19.,9 Attest: dfo- Clk-4 A. - /' _filte,La-,fi <0,4-123.-,Â·b Secretary Countersigned: Authorized Signature CO 1045 * * Pitkin County Title, Inc. 601 E. Hopkins #3 Aspen, CO 81611 .. CONDITIONS AND STIPULATIONS 1. The term "mortgage", when used herein, shall include deed of trust, trust deed or other security instrument. 2. If the Proposed Insured has or acquires actual knowledge of any defect, lien, encumbrance, adverse claim or other matter affecting the estate or interest or mortgage thereon covered by this Commitment other than those shown in Schedule B hereof, and shall fail to disclose such knowledge to the Company in writing, the Company shall be relieved from liability for any loss or damage resulting from any act of reliance hereon to the extent the Company is prejudiced by failure to so disclose such knowledge. If the Proposed Insured shall disclose such knowledge to the Company, or if the Company otherwise acquires actual knowledge of any such defect, lien or encumbrance, adverse claim or other matter, the Company at its option may amend Schedule B of this Commitment accordingly, but such amendment shall not relieve the Company from liability previously incurred pursuant to paragraph 3 of these Conditions and Stipulations. 3. Liability of the Company under this Commitment shall be only to the named Proposed Insured and such parties included under the definition of Insured in the form of policy or policies committed for and only for actual loss incurred in reliance hereon in undertaking in good faith (a) to comply with the requirements hereof, or (b) to eliminate exceptions shown in Schedule B, or (c) to acquire or create the estate or interest or mortgage thereon covered by this Commitment In no event shall such liability exceed the amount stated in Schedule A for the policy or policies committed for and such liability is subject to the insuring provisions and Conditions and Stipulations and the Exclusions from Coverage of the form of policy or policies committed for in favor of the Proposed Insured which are hereby incorporated by reference and are made a part of this Commitment except as expressly modified herein. 4. This Commitment is a contract to issue one or more title insurance policies and is not an abstract of title or a report of the condition of title. Any action or actions or rights of action that the Proposed Insured may have or may bring against the Company arising out of the status of the title to the estate or interest or the status o f the mortgage thereon covered by this Commitment must be based on and are subject to the provisions of this Commitment. 5. The policy to be issued contains an arbitration clause. All arbitrable matters when the Amount of Insurance is $2,000,000.00 or less shall be arbitrated at the option ofeither the Company or the Insured as the exclusive remedy of the parties. You may review a copy of the arbitration rules at http:Uwww.alta.org. e . COMMITMENT FOR TITLE INSURANCE SCHEDULE A 1. Effective Date: August 11, 2014 at 8:00 AM Case No. PCT24123W2 2. Policy or Policies to be issued: (a) ALTA Owner's Policy-(6/17/06) Amount$ 6,000,000.00 Premium$ 10,010.00 Proposed Insured: Rate: Standard 530 HALLAM LLC, A COLORADO LIMITED LIABILITY COMPANY (b) ALTA Loan Policy-(6/17/06) Amount$ 0.00 Premium$ 0.00 Proposed Insured: Rate: (c) ALTA Loan Policy-(6/17/06) Amount$ Premium$ Proposed Insured: Rate: 3. Title to the FEE SIMPLE estate or interest in the land described or referred to in this Commitment is at the effective date hereof vested in: SHAFROTH ASPEN HOUSE LLC, A COLORADO LIMITED LIABILITY COMPANY 4. The land referred to in this Commitment is situated in the County of PITKIN State of COLORADO and is described as follows: LOTS K, L AND M, BLOCK 28, CITY AND TOWNSITE OF ASPEN PITKIN COUNT'Y TITLE, INC. Schedule A-PG.1 601 E. HOPKINS, ASPEN, CO. 81611 This Commitment is invalid 970-925-1766 Phone/970-925-6527 Fax unless the Insuring 877-217-3158 Toll Free Provisions and Schedules A and B are attached. AUTHORIZED AGENT Countersigned: /--K4 ro.7-, dA-'W V . . PARCEL ID# 2 3 75- 12425-004 LOT K,L,M BLOCK 28 , i ~ ;17,31.1 . ....f 'Dr -# di ~. 0 E 1- Â·Â· HE Ch,rrlÂ· s ' Ap:, 1 o Ll.,Â· In,3-, B.41Â·. m 182 1 3 2 ItÂ·... i. fri Ski Held a * 530 W Hallam St Asoe i : 11"fad:> 1,2.,ire' 29 11- 1 1 -11. 1 Ski LangllÂ·il )e;,15 Ill M LU 54 4,1 . 73 A':trÂ·, Mst:iiiÂ·al boaety , us post olf,"e ... 05 #0 GE o 11,(-kDryIl'I' e LE:' 0 140-1 Mark 4'ZZ MrKI,Ir, 9 11Â·Â·. â€¢ 0/ A-Â·pen Day c.Â·:a ard pharro J < LU HeÂ·-11'>.Â· ate Ar.ne'l li Â· , e SK, Biler Â· A'ziwi - - - < 5 0 82 - 0 &# LlÂ· - I 1.- < Â· 4 Tyrotpar I odge AsueÂ·, Mountain .04(se - . It'ttel Asoet . .. 11Â·, , 7. I he Ii,n,h-ick - O 8 - Molly Glow,Â· 1.,fige - (,) 1 87, Carts Pharmary m 14 4 '1 , - U.) Matn Street ilat,4 1..Â·re Ar . Hakery & 1-:ale Aubrigr IleÂ·,orÂ· SI Mor,12 _odge 4. Pae,scke Park Ma:Â·L.litÂ·a A..Del B'Pwi J 12 k. .. A.:ir' Ice Car(len V.1 Whitri.,-1 111* ProlrI'llb It .1Â¥ Plotted On: 10/14/14 EGEE-Grb-OLb dVIN AlINIOIA .. CITY OF ASPEN PRE-APPLICATION CONFERENCE SUMMARY PLANNER: Sara Adams, 970/429-2778 DATE: 8/26/14 PROJECT: 530 West Hallam Street REPRESENTATIVE: Kim Raymond, 970/925-2252 ,BEQUEST: Historic Lot Split, Major Historic Development, RDS, Demolition 14//. i 1 1,2 ' .935 i>/\0 - 14 DESCRIPTION: The potential applicant Is interested in removing non-historic additions to restore the landmark to a single family home, splitting the lot, and constructing a new single family home on the newly created vacant lot for the property located at 530 W. Hallam Street. The subject property is a 9,000 square feet lot and is zoned R-6, medium density residential. Major Historic Development review is required for the design of the historic home and its restoration, and for the design of the new home. Residential Design Standards (RDS) are required to be met on both properties. The applicant has indicated that driveway access will be provided from the alley. HPC has the authority to grant variances from certain dimensional requirements and from the RDS. Demolition of the non-historic additions and the 500 sf FAR Bonus are reviewed by the HPC. City Council reviews the proposed historic lot split. No more than 2 lots may be created through the historic lot split process. The FAR for each lot is allocated based on the FAR of the fathering 9,000 square feet parcel. If the applicant seeks the FAR Bonus, then that is allocated to each lot during the historic lot split process. Below are links to the Land Use Application form and Land Use Code for your convenience: Land Use App: http://www.aspenpitkin.com/Portals/0/docs/City/ComdeWApps%20and%20Fees/2013%20land%20use%20app%20form.p df Land Use Code: http://www.aspenpitkin.com/Departments/Community-DevelopmentiPlanning-and-Zoninq/Title-26-Land-Use-Code/ Relevant Land Use Code Section(s): 26.304 Common Development Review Procedures 26.410 Residential Design Standards 26.415.070 Development involving historic properties 26.415.080 Demolition 26.415.110 Benefits 26.470.060.1 GMQS - single family and duplex development on historic landmark propetties 26.480.060.B Historic Landmark Lot Split 26.515 Parking 26.575.020 Calculations and Measurements 26.600 Impact Fees and Dedications 26.710.040 R-6 Zone District Review by: Staff for completeness AHPC Major HPC and Historic Lot Split 530 W. Hallam 2735-124-25-004 1 .. Review agencies for compliance HPC and City Council Public Hearing: Yes, HPC and City Council Neighborhood Outreach: Yes, prior to first HPC hearing Planning Fees: FOR HPC REVIEW: $1,950 for 6 hours of staff time. SEPARATE APPLICATION REQUIRED FOR CITY COUNCIL REVIEW FOR COUNCIL REVIEW: $3,250 for 10 hours of staff time. Any unbilled portion of this deposit will be refunded at the conclusion of the case. Additional staff hours, if needed, will be billed at $325 per hour. Referrals: Engineering @ $265/hour Total Deposit: $2215 To apply, submit the following information: ~K 0"Completed Land Use Application and signed fee agreement. Of Pre-application Conference Summary(this document). 4Street address and legal description of the parcel on which development is proposed to occur, consisting of a current (no older than 6 months) certificate from a title insurance company, an ownership and encumbrance report, or attorney licensed to practice in the State of Colorado, listing the names of all owners of the property, and all mortgages, judgments, liens, easements, contracts and agreements affecting the parcel, and demonstrating the owner's right to apply for the Development Application. ~Applicant's name, address and telephone number in a letter signed by the applicant that states the name, address and telephone number of the representative authorized to act on behalf of the applicant. 0 A site improvement survey (no older than a year from submittal) including topography and vegetation showing the current status of the parcel certified by a registered land surveyor by licensed in the State of Colorado. 00'AOA Compliance form (Attached) 1 , [3 Documentation showing the proposal meets all Transportation Mitigation Requirements as outlined in the City's Transportation Impact Analysis Guidelines and Mitigation Tool, available online at: http://www.aspenpitkin.com/Departments/Community-Development/Planning-and-Zoning/Recent-Code- Amendments/. A copy of the tool showing trips generated and the chosen mitigation measures should be included with the application. (1 f- i O A written description of the proposal and an explanation in written, graphic, or model form of how the proposed development complies with the review standards relevant to the development application and relevant land use approvals associated with the property. O Written responses to all review criteria. 2 .. O An 8 1/2" by 11" vicinity map locating the parcel within the City of Aspen. El 1 Complete Copy. If the copy is deemed complete by staff, the following items will then need to be submitted: 0 12 Copies of the complete application packet and, if applicable, associated drawings. O Total deposit for review of the application. O A digital copy of the application provided in pdf file format. Disclaimer: The foregoing summary is advisory in nature only and is not binding on the City. The summary is based on current zoning, which is subject to change in the future, and upon factual representations that may or may not be accurate. The summary does not create a legal or vested right. 3 00.-20(4.Aftfo COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT Agreement to Pay Application Fees An agreement between the City of Aspen ("City") and Property 530 W Hallam, llc Phone NoÂ· 970-920-1280 Owner ("1"): Email- aspenstarwood@gmail.com Address of 530 W Hallam Billing 530 Hallam, llc Property Aspen, CO 81611 Address: % Aspen Starwood (subject of (send bills here) 0133 Prospector Lane application) Aspen, CO 81611 I understand that the City has adopted, via Ordinance No. , Series of 2011, review fees for Land Use applications and the payment of these fees is a condition precedent to determining application completeness. I understand that as the property owner that I am responsible for paying all fees for this development application. For flat fees and referral fees: I agree to pay the following fees for the services indicated. I understand that these flat fees are non-refundable. 0 Select Dept 0 Select Dept $ flat fee for . $- flat fee for _ 0 Select Dept 0 Select Review $ flat fee for . $ flat fee for For deposit cases only: The City and I understand that because of the size, nature or scope of the proposed project, it is not possible at this time to know the full extent or total costs involved in processing the application, 1 understand that additional costs over and above the deposit may accrue. I understand and agree that it is impracticable for City staff to complete processing, review, and presentation of sufficient information to enable legally required findings to be made for project consideration, unless invoices are paid in full. The City and I understand and agree that invoices mailed by the City to the above listed billing address and not returned to the City shall be considered by the City as being received by me. I agree to remit payment within 30 days of presentation of an invoice by the City for such services. I have read, understood, and agree to the Land Use Review Fee Policy including consequences for non-payment. I agree to pay the following initial deposit amounts for the specified hours of staff time. I understand that payment of a deposit does not render an application complete or compliant with approval criteria. If actual recorded costs exceed the initial deposit, I agree to pay additional monthly billings to the City to reimburse the City for the processing of my application at the hourly rates hereinafter stated. 1950.00 6 $ deposit for hours of Community Development Department staff time. Additional time above the deposit amount will be billed at $325 per hour. 265.00 1 $ deposit for hours of Engineering Department staff time. Additional time above the deposit amount will be billed at $265 per hour. City of Aspen: Property Owner: - Chris Bendon Community Development Director Name: 4536 14 A U,41*01, LLC Title: MAâ‚¬, le- FA 00 LAÂ¥-r[-7 1 Kyle, it City Use: O Fees Due: $ Received: $ January. 2013 Cit> of Aspen I 130 S. Galena St. i (970) 920-5090 .. COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT Homeowner Association Compliance Policy All land use applications within the City of Aspen are required to include a Homeowner Association Compliance Form (this form) certifying the scope of work included in the land use application complies with all applicable covenants and horneowner association policies. The certification must be signed by the provetty owner or A#omey representing the property owner. Name: Property Owner 510 WALLAÂ»-t LLC- ('1"): Email: AS'FE/Â·45-7-Allk)0012 â‚¬ Phone Non 920 - 128 O an; Adt_ , f.6 1,-rl Address of 9 30 L,J 1-1/ALLA ,Â·A Property: (subject of AS Â¥7Â£,AL CO application) I certify as follows: (pick one) 94 This property is not subject to a homeowners association or other form of private covenant. U This property is subject to a homeowners association or private covenant and the improvements proposed in this land use application do not require approval by the homeowners association or covenant beneficiary. El This property is subject to a homeowners association or private covenant and the improvements proposed in this land use application have been approved by the homeowners association or covenant beneficiary. Evidence of approval is attached. I understand this policy and I understand the City of Aspen does not interpret, enforce, or manage the applicability, meaning or effect of private covenants or homeowner association rules or bylaws. I understand that this document is a public document. Owner signature: ~ -_~~-ate: 10Â·13Â·14 Owner printed name: MAY-K, Fy-1Â£-PLA+1121 ,/1612-0. or, Attorney signature: date: Attorney printed name: