The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutLand Use Case.709 E Durant Ave.0061.2015.ASLUSKY HOTEL 0061.2015.ASLU Sky Hotel Amendment 2737 182 80 001 and 0065.2015.ASLU Sky Hotel Redevelop 2737 182 80 001 U f ' THE CITY OF ASPEN City of Aspen Community Development Department CASE NUMBER 0061.2015.ASLU PARCEL ID NUMBERS 2737 182 800 01 PROJECT ADDRESS 709 E DURANT AVE PLANNER JESSICA GARROW CASE DESCRIPTION SKY HOTEL AMENDMENT 1- 1 FOLDER REPRESENTATIVE SUNNYVANN DATE OF FINAL ACTION 07/09/15 CLOSED BY ANGELA SCOREY ON: 10/19/2015 00(01.20/5 RECEPT'-N#: 621405, 07/09/2015 at 11:14:21 , 1 OF 2, R $16.00 Doc Code APPROVAL Janice K. Vos Caudill, Pitkin County, CO NOTICE OF APPROVAL FOR ADMINISTRATIVE PLANNED DEVELOPMENT - PROJECT REVIEW AMENDMENT FOR THE PROPERTY LOCATED AT 709 E DURANT AVE (THE SKY HOTEL), CITY OF ASPEN, PITKIN COUNTY, COLORADO. Parcel ID: 2737-182-80-001 APPLICANT: Aspen Club Lodge Properties, LLC REPRESENTATIVE: Scott McHale, Rowland + Broughton Architects Sunny Vann, Vann Associates SUBJECT & SITE OF AMENDMENT: The Sky Hotel is zoned Lodge (L) and includes a Planned Development (PD) Overlay. The PD was approved in Ordinance 39, Series of 2014 as part of an application for redevelopment of the property. This is an administrative PD - Project Review Amendment to correct the setbacks included in Ordinance 39, Series of 2014. BACKGROUND AND PROJECT SUMMARY: The Sky Hotel received approval from City Council (Ordinance 39, Series 2014) on February 9, 2015 to redevelop the property with a new lodge. Part of the initial application included a request to vary the setbacks allowed in the Lodge zone district. In December of 2014, the applicant rescinded this request and provided updated drawings to illustrate that the building would meet the setbacks allowed in the Lodge zone district. While the drawings were updated. Exhibit A to the Ordinance was not. Exhibit A includes all of the approved dimensions for the project. Section 1 of Ordinance 39, Series 2014, states, in part, that "The dimensions shall be those outlined in Exhibit A. Minor variations may be approved subject to review by the Community Development Department." The applicant has requested that the Community Development Department approve a "minor variation" to the setbacks included in Ordinance 39's Exhibit A to ensure the approved dimensions match the approved drawings. The correct setbacks should be as follows: MINIMUM SETBACKS Above Grade East Side Yard, West Wing - 5 Feet East Side Yard, East Wing - 6.4 Feet West Side Yard - 5 Feet Below Grade East Side Yard, East Wing - 5 Feet East Side Yard, West Wing - 5 Feet All other setbacks - As included in Exhibit A to Ordinance 39, Series 2014 Sky Hotel, Ordinance 39 (Series 2014) Project Review Amendment Page 1 of 2 STAFF EVALUATION: The proposed building is identical to that approved by City Council in Ordinance 39, Series 2014. An administrative error resulted in Exhibit A not being updated to match the final approved drawings. This is a technical error that does not change the overall project or approval by City Council. The Ordinance provides the Community Development Department the ability to make minor modifications to the dimensional requirements administratively. In addition, the setbacks meet those allowed in the Lodge zone district. DECISION: The Community Development Director finds the proposed PD Amendment is consistent with the applicable review criteria and thereby, APPROVES the amendment. The revised setbacks are as follows: Above Grade - 10 ft Minimum Front Yard Setback (feet) Below Grade - 5 ft Above Grade, West Wing - 5 ft Minimum East Side Yard Setback (feet) Above Grade, East Wing -6.4 ft Below Grade - 5 ft Above Grade - 5 ft Minimum West Side Yard Setback (feet) Below Grade - 5 ft Above Grade - 5 ft Minimum Rear Yard Setback (feet) Below Grade - 5 ft APPROVED BY: 4/Â¥/ans Jennifer Ph4A Date / Community Development Deputy Director Sky Hotel, Ordinance 39 (Series 2014) Project Review Amendment Page 2 0 f 2 Page 1 of 1 *71541* Print Date: Janice K. Vos Caudill 7/9/2015 11:14:04 Pitkin Count> Transaction #: 71541 Clerk and Recorder AM Receipt #: Pending 530 East Main Street Aspen, CO 81611 (970) 429-2707 www.PitkinClerk.org Customer lili'ormation Transaction Information Payment Summary DateReceived: 07/09/2015 Source Code: Over the Counter Over the (ASPCIT) ASPEN CITY OF Q Code: Counter Total Fees $16.00 ATTN CITY CLERK Over the Total Payments $16.00 Return Code: Counter Trails Type: Recording Agent Ref Num: 1 Payments $16.00 f-LJ~(.fiECK 10240 1 Recorded Items BLI. (APPROVAL) APPROVAL ANY IY Pif Recording @ $11 for 1 pg and $5 for 2 or more 2 $16.00 pgs $ 1 Surcharge 0 Search Items 0 Miscellaneous Items file:///C:/Program%20Files/RecordingModule/default.htm 7/9/2015 RECEPTION#: 617367, 02/12/2015 at 11:07:35 AM, 4 OF 14, Janice K. Vos Caudill, .kin County, CO WHEREAS, the City Council finds that this Ordinance furthers and is necessary for the promotion of public health, safety, and wel fare. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ASPEN AS FOLLOWS: Section 1: Approvals Pursuant to the procedures and standards set forth in Title 26 0 f the Aspen Municipal Code, the City Council hereby grants the Sky Hotel Planned Development - Project Review approval, Subdivision approval, Final Timeshare approval, Growth Management approvals, Special Review approval, Conditional Use approval, and Conceptual Commercial Design approval, for a Site Specific Development Plan for the Sky Hotel Subdivision/PD, subject to the conditions of approval as listed herein. The dimensions shall be those as outlined in Exhibit A. Minor variations may be approved subject to review by the CommurATy Development Department. Th; CondItiGE-UERD-proval shall allow tor restaurant, retail, service, and ski locker uses. Section 2: Effectiveness of Ordinance 4, Series 2015 The Sky Hotel project shall be subject to the provisions of Ordinance 4, Series 2015. Section 3: Subsequent Reviews Pursuant to the procedures and standards set forth in Title 26 of the Aspen Municipal Code, the Applicant is required to obtain Final Commercial Design Review and Planned Development - Detail Review following approval of the reviews outlined herein. The applicant shall combine these applications, and they shall be made no later than one (1) year following approval of this Ordinance. Section 4: Timeshare Lodge Requirements A public rental requirement assuring that unused timeshare lodge rooms will be available to the general public. Such rental requirement shall be documented in the Sky Hotel Timeshare Documents and shall contain a provision that this requirement cannot be eliminated from the Condominium Declarations without approval from the City of Aspen City Council. Periodic audits, pursuant to Section 26.575.210, Lodge occupancy auditing, of the Land Use Code rnay be conducted. Section 5: Growth Management Allotments 5.1 Reconstruction Credits. Based on the existing Sky Hotel development, the Applicant is entitled to the following reconstruction credits, pursuant to Land Use Chapter 26.470. a. A total of 90 lodging bedrooms, equating to 180 lodge pillows, is credited toward the Project. b. A commercial reconstruction credit of 5,259 square feet of net leasable area is credited toward the Project. 5.2 Growth Management Allotments. The following growth management allotments are recommended to be granted to the Sky Hotel Project: a. 27 lodging bedrooms = 54 lodging pillows. Added to the reconstruction credits, the project represents 107 lodging bedrooms or 214 pillows, City Council Ordinance No. 39, Series 2014 Page 4 of 14 RECEPTION#: 617367, 02/12/2015 at 11:07:35 AM, 14 OF 14, Janice K. Vos Caudill tkin County, CO ATTeT: LIY~lli,~itttY*t ~ ATTACHMENTS: Exhibit A: Approved Dimensional Requirements Exhibit A: Approved Dimensional Requirements 104 units and 117 bedrooms in Lodge Units and Net Livable 56,509 sq ft net livable Commercial Net Leasable 3,480 sci ft net leasable Affordable Housing Units and Net Livable 2 units in 1,714 sq ft net livable Minimum Gross Lot Size (sq ft) 42,645 sq ft Minimum Net Lot Size (sq ft) 37,113 sq ft Minimum Net Lot Area per Free-Market dwelling unit 4,864 sq ft (sq ft) Minimum Lot Width (feet) 116 ft Minimum Front Yard Setback (feet) Above Grade - 10 ft Below Grade - 5 ft .9' ta i -Abave G-rade - 6.4 ft East Wing;(2.87 MT-' Minimum East Side Yard Setback (feet) -. : West Wing Below Grade - 10 ft : Minimum West Side Yard Setback (feet) Above Grade - 13 ft Below i?ade - 5 ft Minimum Rear Yard Setback (feet) Above Grade - 5 ft Below Gr~de - 5 ft Maximum Height (feet) 40 feet Maximum Height for mechanical 50 feet Public Amenity Space 11,798 sqft (27.6%) Lshould be Allowed Floor Area* Overall 91,552 sq ft (2.46:1)* 5', not 10' Lodge 72,781 sq ft (1.96:1) Commercial 3,460 sq ft (.09:1) Affordable Housing 1,876 sq ft (.05:1) Parking Garage: 54 Spaces Minimum Off-Street Parking Surface Spaces: 12.5 spaces for Aspen Alps Minimum Trash/Recycle Area 560 sq ft *Minor changes during PD - Detail Review ancFor building permit review may be approved such that they do not exceed those in the underlying zone district City Council Ordinance No. 39, Series 2014 Page 14 of 14 j \ 5 *CA j.e ths! r~-6. m Lz e DURANT AVENUE 31 ~ ~-/u-des, -_ rowland+broughton 7Mehop~im.l,e 16:./.st./.200 A1 \ 1 \ \ 411\\\\ aspe~,co 81611 denver cc 00202 D70.544.0006 0 303300.13730 /0.544.3473 ' S03.308.1375/ EL==A SIDEWALK - %-PROPER.%, r- 1 Ck,aull/, 11 -,1-7115 8..mljZflfl--------2./. , . L'it k, ~fLE' r~ = [QU'02*k-2.1 1,1 96. - 2 1 42%.f: CHATEAU CHATEAU ..91 -6 =mn METERS n h'11 STA .L DUMONT CHAUMONT (3 - STORY) (3-STORY) ON 60 +-1 1 ~~ Â£1 91ML1wL - 41( 4. ) 06.12.2014 ... U F >12 CONCEPTUALDESIGNAMEW APMCATION IC> 08.08.2014 The Exhibit A in APPLICANON' {P&2) CONCEPTU. DE.k~NE~~ Ordinance says = west setback is 13'-0" above E / -. CONCe#M .%** 09.05.2014 APPLICATION 3 (Paa 10.14.2014 ~/TRA.P'~1 APPL ICATION 4 {0&2, grade, however ~ O PLANNED.EVELOPMENT MID,Â£3r-=1 Â· L*x=J EXIST CHAU 0,5+ 1 3 0-1 APPLICAT1ONS ~COUNCI) 11.10.2014 drawings are -EL Ill *Es SALES ~|| Iz~ Â°~~ F -=m' % Â§ ~ANNEOOEVELOPMENT Ir I I I ASRV 12.03.2014 11 ' DIR +mÂ¥~ ALLEY technically )RY) In APPLICATIONG ~C.NCÂ© 12.29.2014 PLANNEDDEVELOPMENT k -m8.'INF , APPUC;AT~ON 7 (COUNCk, different T 1 3 'IN& ma St-182-*rt- ~~~--A Qi--tae--~SREf maafk@L~RA~~1,~P+LAidâ‚¬lt~~32,3~ kERRACE 1 TRI'KIDNE . hAETaAr/| /1/E REiANINU WALL'*Nitxb 24 Fill LODBY ~91 LIA[494-04-9 ., .~ lf_P OCOOF 11 -- rwERY 0/EN ABOVE, g , GLORY HOLE e I Elail : 1 BoRM Im T CONDOMINIUMS ~ 0 '' .1 {3-STORY) IL (080~EF-[70 79 1 this wall face .21212 5-- 4111,0 71 .1 FT â€¢PL .Eu OFFICES ... 11 e 4LFUÂ»---~ ' 71Â¥ is10'-10" from -77Ef- CORRIDOR : *rm V L SKY HOTEL prop line 11 30 - M ~IA'~03Â·1[rÂ·k ?E P.~F|IPL 1# Ab 1# ~4 Jf#z - -n - - ~the stair is ASPEN, CO 81611 709 E. DURANT AVENUE 5' from \\1 -19 - - #ae -11 ~ ' 1' PRIVATE Drop line - 6-"*L--7.-1---2/.IN. ' \ , P>Allk., W.EME"UN, _._. ' 41-' '. U,IAA' ~__ I ,=% 1 RESIDENCE 14 .k: ~//I SPEC~LEVENTSPACE \ 12 ~I--~ I (2-STORY) \\\\\ \ LJ I ---- '- P....17 1 1. ' * ; J 'Wr, this corner of the *PN -~is./ /3 - ONE WAY ALPS ACCESS/DRIVEWAY / V 1.0 1 rN garage entry in rt.. / t__1 1 ... R. only 5'-5" from -/ 21406 + /1 'El d. I / west prop line DWGF~_E: 420 '' ,â€¢448.n- ASPEN ALPS >g> SHEETTULE 74 7 21406_.2.10.'.9 N<42 + j (2 -STORY) , . Ki./h / BUILDING 100 PROPOSED LEVEL 1 \ 9296 1 FLOOR PLAN 9 7 L 1 ~-1 1 2 1 Fl/ PLAN TRUE A2.10 ,/ ' 4#2 / SCALE: 1/16-=1'-0- ~ -28'POSED 4 < 1 ~ LEVEL 1 FLOOR PLAN , 90 -- ( /.10 / SCALE: 1,1 r i 1.-r ==. ==- 74 SIDE# K ORRIDOR 3NPUU. ie DURANT AVENUE ,~hileriur~'u,O~.Ides,n ii,ie,-~049, rowland+broughton 764..m,ve 1530 U,ke st.,la - :ron=' ve= U70544.34731 38.Â®0.1375 / PROPERTYUNE 'Â·s...... k k :1/!8/15 ,"F~L'11*4Â·i--1 M ~*AS ILNOUI~//1 = 99- 4, RE.C.AO' 1~ 1 | 0 1 1 W--5 0 tv_.291-1 621. D ,#,5 L_j , -ECxfM. ~i*IF] M;. 6 -C ABOVE 0 05 1- 1 9 -p: 06.12.2014 CONCEPTUAL DEIGN.EVIEW APPLI~nON IP&a I , ROCIS 08.08.2014 CONCEPTUALDESIGNRE*W APPLICAT~/ 2.60 E R 1 MENS Sk t i 09.05.2014 1 m 514 CONCEPTUALDESIONREVIEW -- 12 WALKIN * & I WOMENS i: COOLERS APPLICATION-) 10.14.2014 F'- -3 49 CoNCEPTUAI DF61GNREVIEW |5' setbackl APPLICATION' (pv 11.10.2014 PLANNEDDEVE~OPMENT APPLICAION 5 (COUNCILI 2 =32 0- 12.03.2014 P~ANNED DEVELOPMENT $ UNEDFaUILDINGA@OVE 12.29.2014 APPLICATION# (COUNC. Met}u..CArnm v kn,w7 ......1 INF APPLICATION 7 {COUNCILI MANNEDDEVELOPMENT 11 45 -r= SHORINGWAil ki ' Mevm, t_ _____112_ '_ 1 _'_ 1 _t_ 92 _ '_ 1 _'_ f -E~~3rr72'_ 1 _'_ i _'_L_!_ '_ 1 _'_ 1 22 _ L ___1. _-_ L ELEv LOBSY 4 friffulit ENG -*1 1 1 OFFICE Q W g | 8.ANDEUPA. ING ./ \ otâ€¢NOEM,ARKING 1 S'ACES ./Ac Es WORK SHOP 54 TOTAL PARKING SKY HOTEL SPACES 1 from 709 E. DURANT AVENUE /1198111111111 I f--lEI property 5' setback 3 ASPEN. CO 81611 r-1 r--ip-,J---, LNEDFBULD~OABD~ i . I line &11 & ]F--f-' armÂ¥ SPAC GPA~K~NG,~CES 1-\-\I. 16- 71- T- F- 1 - 1 -\I- -10 -1-\1 -1 - 9 17\ i //1 %,1 1 \\\ 4\\\ SHOHINL. WALL '\PROPERTV LINE \ 1 i \ \ 1 1 1 6/ ,/ 0% 'L-f '11 1 44<353,/ PROJECTNO 21406 DWS FILE: 21408_.2.0001/ SHEET TITLE PROPOSED BASEMENT Ll FLOOR PLAN ~ ~ nPROPOSED NORâ„¢ NORTH A2.00 SCALE: 1/16Â·=1 â‚¬ PLAN TRUE ~ A2100 ~ ~S~Â·MENif~ DIOR PLAN aa 3292-:-r.EMEBE . DRINGÂ¥1,/11 SPRING STREET /1 DINGABOVE 133M1S TVNI9IMO Aya,NurÂ» 1Â£ A-44 -Eo @-M Â·-re Â·Â·gW-Â·Ua,0 DO b[Â· 20(5-Â· 656(4 VANN ASSOCIATES, LLC Planning Consultants RECEIVED June 23, 2015 UV 2 6 2015 HAND DELIVERED CITY OFASPEN COMMUNITY DEVELOPMEN1 Ms. Jessica Garrow Aspen Community Development Department 130 South Galena Street Aspen, CO 81611 Re: Sky Hotel/Approved Dimensional Requirements Dear Jessica: As we discussed, there are three scrivener's errors in Exhibit A: Approved Dimen- sional Requirements to Ordinance No. 39, Series of 2014. More specifically, the Above Grade East Side Yard Setback for the Hotel's West Wing; the Above Grade West Side Yard Setback; and the Below Grade East Side Yard Setback for its East and West Wings are incorrect. While the Level 1 and Basement Ll Floor Plans that were reviewed by the Communi- ty Development Department and approved by the City Council depict the correct setbacks, Exhibit A to the Ordinance apparently was not updated to reflect the ap- proved plans, and neither Scott McHale or I caught the errors. The correct setbacks, as depicted on the plans, are as follows. Minimum Setbacks Above Grade East Side Yard West Wing 5 Feet West Side Yard 5 Feet Below Grade East Side Yard East Wing 5 Feet West Wing 5 Feet Fortunately both Appendix A and Section 1 of the Ordinance permit COMDEV to approve minor variations in the Approved Dimensional Requirements. While the RO. Box 4827 Â· Basalt, Colorado 81621 Â· 970/925-6958 Â· Fax 970/920-9310 vannassociates@comcast.net Ms. Jessica Garrow 0 0 61Â· 206- -Ab LGI June 23, 2015 Page 2 above changes are more correctly considered scrivener's errors as opposed to varia- tions, it is my understanding that the City Attorney has indicated that Appendix A may be revised by COMDEV pursuant to this provision. Accordingly, I would appreciate it if you would revise Appendix A to reflect the corrected setbacks and rerecord Ordinance 39 with the Pitkin County Clerk and Recorder with appropriate notation as to the purpose of the rerecordation. Should you have any questions, or if I can be of any further assistance, please do not hesitate to call. Yours truly, VANN ASSOCIAIES, LLC 43* I. 10 4~#/k 426 fSun~ Vann -*9<Â· 215 r.. SV: CWV /4%421, Ce: John Sari)a Scott McHale Gideon Kaufman, Esq. d: \oldc\bus\city. Itr\]tr60814.jg3 *. I ... Angela Scorey 036 1,2015, *SUA Â·om: Jessica Garrow ent: Monday, June 29, 2015 11:01 AM To: Sunny Vann CC: Angela Scorey Subject: Sky Hotel Amendment fee Hi Sunny, Please submit a 1 hour deposit for $325 for the Sky Hotel Amendment. As soon as that check gets to Angie she can open the case and we'll process the amendment. Any hours over 1 will be charged at $325 an hour, though I don't expect it to take much more than an hour. Thanks, Jessica 7(8 9, 3)<xe20 4006 Jessica Garrow, AICP Long Range Planner Community Development Department City of Aspen 130 South Galena Street Aspen, CO 81611 70.429.2780 'ww.aspencommunityvision.com www.aspenpitkin.com Notice and Disclaimer: This message is intended only for the individual or entity to which it is addressed and may contain information that is confidential and exempt from disclosure pursuant to applicable law. If you are not the ntended recipient, please reply to the sender that you have received the message in error and then delete it. Further, the information or opinions contained in this email are advisory in nature only and are not binding on the City of Aspen. If applicable, the information and opinions contain in the email are based on current zoning, which is subject to change in the future, and upon factual representations that may or may not be accurate. The opinions and information contained herein do not create a legal or vested right or any claim of detrimental reliance. 6-7 107 d kect RECEIVED JUNBO ?015 CITY OF ASPEN 01MI,9..M~.VELOPMENT 1 5 0 LA 3-+ f L b r.01 THE CITY OF ASPEN City of Aspen Community Development Department CASE NUMBER 0065.2015.ASLU PARCEL ID NUMBERS 2737 182 800 01 PROJECT ADDRESS 709 E DURANT AVE PLANNER JESSICA GARROW CASE DESCRIPTION SKY HOTEL REDEVELOPMENT 1- 1 FOLDER REPRESENTATIVE SUNNYVANN DATE OF FINAL ACTION 09/02/15 CLOSED BY ANGELA SCOREY ON: 10/19/2015 00(05Â·2015 (DCO? 5, 70 5 / 66 j 90 9 8 0.~ 21,+- I 1 . RECEPTION#: 625587, 12/15/2015 at 10:55:04 AM, 1 OF 4, R $26.00 Doc Code APPROVAL ~ Janice K. Vos Caudill, Pitkin County, CO j NOTICE OF APPROVAL FOR INSUBSTANTIAL PLANNED DEVELOPMENT AMENDMENT FOR THE PROPERTY LOCATED AT 709 E DURANT AVE (THE SKY HOTEL), CITY OF ASPEN, PITKIN COUNTY, COLORADO. Parcel ID: 2737-182-80-001 APPLICANT: Aspen Club Lodge Properties, LLC REPRESENTATIVE: Sunny Vann, Vann Associates Scott McHale, Rowland + Broughton Architects SUBJECT & SITE OF AMENDMENT: The Sky Hotel is zoned Lodge (L) and includes a Planned Development (PD) Overlay. The PD was approved in Ordinance 39, Series of 2014 as part of an application for redevelopment of the property. Planned Development - Detail Review was approved by the Planning and Zoning Commission in Resolution 17, Series 2015. This is an Insubstantial Amendment to reconfigure internal spaces, refine the public amenity spaces, and make minor design changes to accommodate internal circulation and refined mechanical plans. BACKGROUND AND PROJECT SUMMARY: Since the Council and Planning & Zoning Commission approvals, the applicant has contracted with a new hotel operator. That operator has requested minor changes to the internal configuration of the property to meet their internal operating and functionality standards. The internal revisions include relocation of an elevator, changing how certain associated lodge spaces are used, and re-organization of some commercial and lodge spaces. The revisions will result in no changes to the approved dimensions. In addition, the applicant has continued to refine the public amenity plans for the second floor and roof-top spaces. The size ofthe public amenity spaces, as approved in P&Z Resolution 17, Series 2015, is unchanged. Certain elements are re-organized. This includes removing a roof-top spa and converting it to a fire pit, reconfiguring the roof-top pool, and rearranging planters. Certain changes to the landscaping are proposed. The project will be required to comply with all requirements of the Parks and Engineering Departments as it relates to stormwater management and tree mitigation. Finally, some minor design changes are proposed. This includes flipping a gable roof form along the south property line, and incorporating mechanical venting. The venting will be designed to be consistent with and blend in with the approved architecture. Additional railings, as required by the Building Code, are also proposed. EVALUATION: The proposed changes are consistent with the Sky Hotel approvals. They do not change the character or use ofthe property, and they do not change any ofthe project' s approved dimensions. Sky Hotel, Insubstantial Amendment Page 1 0 f 2 DECISION: The Community Development Director finds the proposed PD Amendment is consistent with the applicable review criteria and thereby, APPROVES the amendment, subject to the following conditions: 1. The Final PD Documents shall meet the requirements of Section 26.445.090(B), Documenting Final Planned Development Approval, and shall incorporate the changes approved herein. No extensidn on the original 180 day timeframe is approved herein. 2. The revised roof plans may impact the anticipated stormwater management plan approved through the Planned Development. The project must meet all applicable requirements related to stormwater, which shall be verified by the Engineering Department as part of Building Permit review. Additional documentation related to these requirements may be required during the review of the final approval documents (Plat and Agreement). APPROVED BY: 43< 9)- 1 11 ~\:b Jermiful r~tiC*11 Date / Communit*Development Deputy Director Attachments: Exhibit A - Staff Findings (not recorded) Exhibit B - Approved design changes Sky Hotel, Insubstantial Amendment Page 2 0 f 2 Exhibit A, Staff Findings 26.445.110. Amendments. Amendments to an approved Project Review or to an approved Detailed Review shall be reviewed according to the standards and procedures outline below. Amendments to Planned Unit Development and Specially Planned Area approvals (pre-Ordinance 36,2013, approvals) shall also proceed according to the standards and procedures outline below and the Coinmunity Development Director shall determine the type of procedure most-applicable to the requested amendment. A. Insubstantial Amendments. An insubstantial amendment to an approved Proj ect Review or an approved Detailed Review may be authorized by the Community Development Director. An insubstantial amendment shall meet the following criteria: 1. The request does not change the use or character of the development. Staff Findings: The proposed amendment changes the configuration of internal spaces, but has no impact on any of the approved dimensions. The internal revisions include relocation of an elevator, changing how certain associated lodge spaces are used, and a reorganization of some commercial and lodge spaces. Other changes include refinement to the rooftop and second level public amenity spaces. No changes to the approved dimensions are proposed. Stafffinds this criterion is met. 2. The request is consistent with the conditions and representations in the project's original approval, or otherwise represents an insubstantial change. Staff Findings: The proposed amendment is consistent with the original approval in that no dimensional changes are proposed and the uses remain the same. The minor reconfigurations are consistent with the approval. Stafffinds this criterion is met. 3. The request does not require granting a variation from the project's allowed use(s) and does not request an increase in the allowed height or floor area. Staff Findings: No changes to the approved dimensions or uses are proposed. Stafffinds this criterion is met. 4. Any proposed changes to the approved dimensional requirements are limited to a technical nature, respond to a design parameter that could not have been foreseen during the Project Review approval, are within dimensional tolerances stated in the Project Review, or otherwise represents an insubstantial change. Staff Findings: No changes to the approved dimensions are proposed. Stafffinds this criterion is niet. 5. An applicant may not apply for Detailed Review if an amendment is pending. Staff Findings: Detailed Review has been previously approved. Stafffinds this criterion is not applicable. ELE)/AnON ELEVATiONOF BIONOF MOST ROOFHE1GHTOVER ACTUKLROOF 110GHT W=AN LAa. FIN~SHEUGRADE MATLIFUL GRADE RESTRICTIME TOPOGRAPIÂ« OVERMOSTNESTRICTIVE 1 7947.9 78~Â·I N~TURAL 7D61' I - 574/"fm 2 794'.I 7947Â·1Â· PROPosED 7D81'Â· I ..1/ 7/.-I 79,7-1 PROPOGED 7-'Â·I W./ 4 7941'-7 7.:-1. PROPOSED 798r./ ... 5 793.-1 79.Â·'/ PROPOSED 78"-r 3.-r [ZN S â„¢3,Â·/ 79... ~lATUA. '00 r ... 7 79... 7937-,C' P~OPOSED 7077Â·I ... rowland+broughton --r f'ROPOSED 7,71Â·Â·r ... ~d,7-.*/*.Â£1,... e - ..Â·r NATv~ 7,7,Â·r 1Â·11Â· 1836~kill/2Go 79=Â·, 7.... PROPOSED 707.Â·r .-11. PEr d.,W..=ED.2 11 .... *Â·21. PROPOSED 7=iâ€¢Â·10Â· ... .3 30,1173. 12 79.-CÂ· 7.C.. -LAL 7977Â·/ 22.I 9705Â«34,3, 3Guo~13,5, I -iÂ·Â·10Â· M. r PROPOSED 7Â»7~Â·2 3â€¢'.I 7,41â€¢-r =Il PROPOSED 707Â·rÂ·. =.I 15 7./.1/ 7-'-r ....SED 7U~.I .r le . -Â·I 11,TU~AL 7071'-1, 27Â·I 17 ... i. 780Â·1,- PRUPOSED 707,-7- ... 1. 79Â¢+I -Â·r mse m.l ... MELE. / 7./.1, â€ž... NATURAL 707Â¥Â·r ./ ..Â·I ...7 NAIURAL WS.. ... Can- 21 1...10' 7.... NATURAL 7974.. ... Exterior mechanical coordination items 22 7.ber 7.1,+1, NAdU* 70â„¢Â·I W .Â· a ~er~.0~, 23 79,rÂ·C 7.... *.... 79.- I ..1 added. 24 - 25 79.-0 7DWÂ·/ NATUR~1 7./. r .- I - Mechanical vents and grilles will be 28 ?04.-,/ 7.'.. NAT~;RAL .r Relocated . 8,- recessed, painted to match adjacent elevator 2. a 790Â·4' w- 7-e ..0" 794~.te N~TURAL 798~+I .,1. materials. They will blend in with *-I NATURIL 7W1.* . 1 %.I =.7 adjacent areas. ~ 32 m,-r NATURAL 797,Â·/ ... 33 78(7.1- NATURAL 79BVÂ·/ ... 7.".1 NATURAL 70$'Â·11. ... 1 P-YEDTU~TCHANA= / . 18201* PDAMENOMENTDOC~ .EVATORMRRUN J IMREP#ME FIREP.ACE FLIES ---I laPOÂ·NTFROM // .....02 1 MECHVENUCHIMNEYRECESSED' ''-lapoll~FROMI ; FIRE'-ACE F.'LE FiREPKEFLUE-~ E..tt5323~~U ./7 EAVETO~DGE I Ni V Â» 1 % rd'.CONC DECK 1 --FIREPLACEFL~ \ .11. 7--11 =='.1 , 1.. 1*=F .1 . 1/ To CONC I , MI . i 1...1 Cy - . - .1 - -1./.4.-Il 7/ 9- '-1 Â· ~ Â· 1 1 - Â· 1 x -1 1 Â· 4 -93_79-_14_ - .'-- T O CONC 4 +1 0 % - -- - _1E,i"1 ! M -- 4 -1.424Â·-fld=-i-. i .!_cÂ· til i-fr~ kl 1 - M -----13- .- . - 1-=2 -1 +Pi= ---- -009"541 7 -1- 9 r..r Cort, . 5.- 20 i Â·â€¢,=====rEEESEM&,0.0 - -~-~- 5 3---_ r- -%.W-Y-1~.--â„¢~ - .TH...n .... 'Nim - Â»7==C=-1-- --Ra-4. DECOW-TRIM-- - RECE.ED'P/'78. TO . . Â· p RECESSE06OEâ„¢LEDTO _ ......CEN BE-to- - ....... p ....1Â£Â¥ELE'.tATION IRNIFRFC'~FO. ,......... 1 C 1 1 NORTH EXTERIOR ELEVATION AD,Â»DENT ALLEY (NORTH ELEVATION) DURANT AVE (NORTH ELEVATION) ey ./16 3,37â€¢ 1. - SKY HOTEL i ,Â·DORIERIS FZ:0:'NC DECK rl,2 POINfFHOÂ¥ i ! . 705 E DURANT AVE / EXCLLOE.FROM 2 -ELEVS.OND 3 =U* 1 0 1 1 / / .HT I ~-rOR,DGE //B(CU~6 I ASPEN./081611 ,~Â£pt,AEFWE . 1 I~ '~ -'~f/ i fT O COHC DECK / FIREPLACEPUUE g~ 1 9 - ="IL1 1 1--A- -/6.1,1 0 Â·i Â· i 1 TO. CONG. A X.m i 4 LEVE- ---- U " _ ----= -- Â·-lin-vr :-- -,T-TH ~ --gPLV--f-45,-1-.Wi42-ECIG~ I' ~T T Q CoNC I _ _U.EVELA_,L-, L PRO*C. NO 121'. T r Z . 2,405~ - I =U=Natz, ..[lil, ,-. F-'Â®_ .2-3 - ,-4 16 [13 I Ill i :ceÂ· 1-,= 11 it I.[ ti ' TOI= Mut--f --2 ----'Off-f,-1--t-*il_t -'* - 4 El-11 liliff .-=.7.1--1----- . - LIVEL. PAâ„¢)~AEA 111. T - ELEVATIONS TO CONC. Â¢ B.. O CON' Gâ€¢RI,GEENTRY SCALE: A~ indicatad - MAIN ENTMY / ......ST..../. L-wALLBOXAANTER(rrP,--' / \ ./.SED.PAINTE..0 - S. GUI[,RI. m9-----1 .EELGUA~DRA.-2 j PD4.1 i- MATCHA[UECE. _ C 2 1 WEST EXTERIOR ELEVATION Â£.0â€¢1/ SCALE_ 3./.bc- ~MECHANIU;NTAKE. .-I 2=-43.-2~~~r IN ELEVATioN ..EVAT,ONOF ELEVATIONOF .0. suRVEYO. ,-p LABEL FINISHEIGRADE NATIA'GRADE RESTRICTIVE ==OVER ==T=71=,VE VERACAnON 7942./ ...4 NATUR,IL 7051Â· I 38.. 2 7.1 I 7842Â·T PROPOSED 70â€ž.. r ..le 3 7942.0. 7.11,Â·r PROPOSED 7all~ I .-/ 4 7/1'.7- 7~*Â·' PROPOSED -1+Â·e .Â· 9 PeC POSED 70'.r 9-I rowland+broughton 0 79. / 7.... N~TURAL M.I .... d-ba-Mo,dpi~ 7937'.I PROPOSED 707.I ... 7,37Â·11' m.Â·/ PROPOSED .71'Â·. 33./ *=r d.r~r == reaDÂ»,I . 200 . 7.... NATUR. 7.?... ..11' 97054490000 m-'al 794,-I PROPOSED M.7 ..11- m.'34731 79. C 79Â¢.2.#C PROPOS.0 7081'Â·10~ ... 12 .... â€žâ€ž7-. NATURA~ 707Â·I .Â·/ 7/1Â·.1/ 704*Â·1~ PROPOSED 'unrÂ·I ... . 7941' I 79.'.. PNOPOSED 7~~Â·r 33 Â·Cr 15 78â‚¬n. M.7 PROP05ED 7glyÂ·/ ..r - 70.4'.I NAWRAL 707t'.e . I i, ige. 1/ 794,Â·11Â· PROPOSED 7.... .7 11 E.I 7944' I PROPOSED m.l ... â€¢â€¢l.INAI S l E/,9 / 76â‚¬- I. 7.4.-I M. L 7975+I StÂ·.2 Car,~afa 20 7,47-0- 79,~Â·I NATURAL 7-7 I ... 21 7g~ - 1/ 7De.2Â· NATUR m. I ... 22 7946 . NATJRAL 70*./ 31'. . 7914Â·Â·I NATUN =Â·I .Â· - Exterior mechanical coordination items m =1=r . 7,~-1/ 7D~Â·/ NATURAL =./ 3.- . 794~Â·1/ 79~Â·I NATURAL ~arÂ· It- .Â· added. Mirrored gable 0 794~ NATUR. =.C' ... 27 â€¢ 794,Â·/ NATURAL m. 0 .Â· - Mechanical vents and grilles will be 79Â¢3'-10- NATURAL my.r ... roof form. r NAnuL 7.Â·-il ..1 recessed, painted to match adjacent 31 794,1./ N*rUS~. --r ./ NATOR,1,1 7978./ 3, I materials. They will blend in with 1'-1 Â·â„¢Â©.... z 7~2.I NA.AAL 7981'Â·r ... 7.71... .M adjacent areas. M.I' POAAIEFaIE..C8 F.4~~E FLUE ~ . 0 1 1.1. 1 epo~PROM 1...ORIDOE %-JE I ' ./.INT.40/ . I~ 670,=GE j EAVE TO RIDGE-/ Â¤-reÂ·er/, i . ' i i. . Â·..rÂ·rrn __-Â«1OPOINTFROM .POINTFROM . - GU~RORAIL AREPUÂ£E \ . T. CONC / EAVETORIDGE EAVETORIDGE7 70 CONC ~â€¢A- .44'~_~__~Li-z=ce=.Al- FLUE- rrrrrY-YvY-Â¥LUE-7, %.1. l. 1- - -+ 4 1 ~-T'-LFNX--1*1 -1 -2/-*t- 44--_20Â¢1Â·29 -54/ 3-4 144Â«J. 1,2_ 7-1-_ 1_42 - b--7-71: -.- -' 121Â·, 7-/ Â·-- 7= ' mAÂ· ~--- 9 f.* 34 91 -4 Bj{ .34 12-440_4Â¢~_ 81=.2 -1-4 +2Â» I TOCONC 4 1 0 CONC -- -~6 , -F-1 ~f--i~L -T ~'- 1 734 f f-n * ,1-Â·rq - 771 - ,# ci --3 ,7,-1- ' - -1 . -1 N h-BATHFAMVEI,r,(rvi 1 T.ocoâ€¢c. . 'fel. 0 Ta CON' I RECES'ca./All I ] i LWc.&.6[â€¢*~4Ll/ l. TOMATCHADâ€¢Ca T 1 M. . RECESSED. LuAA-â€¢-J â€¢ . ...60/0#TCH ASPEN ALPS ACCESS~RIVEV~Y (SOUTH ELEVATiON) C 1 1 SOUTH EXTERIOR ELEVATION - SKY HOTEL =N - \ P042 / SC4.... r.cl - - , I 709/ DURANT AVE FELEVA70R NARIN 8- ~ : 1 TREUI&BEYOND --/EVA:TOR OVERRUN aEÂ¥OND 1 - ASPE' CO 81611 - .FIRE...FLUE - --..Clâ„¢NE~8EYON. -M..CEFLUE *TO CONC -__ -- ----- --- ----- -Â·â‚¬020,27 7= Â¢ : TO CONC. r . --Â·7. -*=iFÂ©#P '- - ' 'V,1!F- - --- --- --- 13:.N~ ' i:i. k . - ....cONt -_ 1 -b-EoNc PROJECTNCk t~HYL -______ __ 1 1 ________ _ .._-------1.----' 0 ------------.952ft-C t â€ž.o,/ , =53# i 1 -2 t SHEETTAE 4 2 PROPOSED EXTERIOR 1 ~ + SM.CY.09 ELEVATIONS r --** -----=======114------1-1 ---- - 6~-- --=-----1-- =Â©00 - ~ - As indicated T ~DW .11111~1-- t=%=ALLL==3=14--1.-1111 f MATCHADJACENT , 1 ./C.tJACE,/ DECO./.VETRUI. F BEON.......110,1 g ==42-77 ORIGINAL STREET fEAST ELEVAnol,0 RECESSED~PN~EDTO PD4.2 Â£. ADJ'CENT C-u-â€¢-uâ€¢ A ,/1 2.1 EAST EXTERLOR ELEVATION I.-3.Phif--1.-E. PD'.d SC~LE -â€¢M ?026.102Â·.aUEf 1 4 - 4 I I DEVELOPMENT ORDER ofthe City of Aspen Community Development Department This Development Order, hereinafter "Order", is hereby issued pursuant to Section 26.304.070, "Development Orders", and Section 26.308.010, "Vested Property Rights", of the City of Aspen Municipal Code. This Order allows development of a site specific development plan pursuant to the provisions of the land use approvals, described herein. The effective date of this Order shall also be the initiation date ofa five-year vested property right. The vested property right shall expire on the day after the fifth anniversary ofthe effective date of the original Development Order, unless a building permit is approved pursuant to Section 26.304.075, or unless an exemption, extension, reinstatement, or a revocation is issued by City Council pursuant to Section 26.308.010. After Expiration of vested property rights, this Order shall remain in full force and effect, excluding any growth management allotments granted pursuant to Section 26.470, but shall be subject to any amendments to the Land Use Code adopted since the effective date of this Order. This Development Order is associated with the property noted below for the site specific development plan as described below. Aspen Club Lodge Properties LLC. 1101 3 om Street. NW, Suite 150, Washington, DC 20007. (202) 625-7890. Property Owner's Name, Mailing Address and telephone number PARCEL I. Woodstone Inn Condominiums, according to the Condominium Map thereof filed March 11. 1983 in Plat Book 14 at Page 45 through 49, inclusive at Reception No. 248609 and as further defined and described in the Condominium Declaration for Woodstone Inn Condominiums recorded March 119 1983 in Book 441 at Page 814 at Reception No. 248608; PARCEL II, a non-exclusive easement and right-of-way for the purpose of ingress and egress over and across that certain parcel described in Long Form easement Agreement unrecorded, notice of which is given by Short Form Easement Agreement recorded April 25, 1977 in Book 327 at Page 777; and PARCEL III, Encroachment License Agreements for the purposes stated therein recorded September 3, 1976 in Book 316 at Page 232, April 30,1982 ' Book 425 at Page 907, in Book 425 at Page 913, in Book 425 at Page 919, and recorded November 13, 1985 in Book )8 at Page 909, County of Pitkin, State of Colorado. 709 E Durant Ave. Parcel ID 273718280001 Legal Description and Street Address of Subject Property The applicant has received approval to redevelop the property with a mixed-use lodge containing 117 lodge bedrooms in 104 lodge units, 3,480 sq ft of commercial net leasable space,2 affordable housing units, and a sub-grade parking garage with 54 space. Written Description of the Site Specific Plan and/or Attachment Describing Plan City of Aspen Planning and Zoning Commission Approval. Approval of PD - Detailed Review and Final Commercial Design Review. August 18, 2015. Resolution 17, Series of 2015. Administrative Approval, Approval of PD Amendment. July 7, 2015. recorded at Reception #621405. CitY of Aspen City Council Approval. Approval of PD - Project Review, Conditional Use Review, Special Review, Subdivision Review, Conceptual Commercial Design Review, Timeshare Review. and Lodge, Commercial, and Affordable Housing Growth Management Reviews, February 9. 2015, Ordinance 39, Series of 2015 Land Use Approvaks) Received and Dates (Attach Final Ordinances or Resolutions) August 27.2015 Effective Date of Development Order (Same as date of publication of notice of approval.) August 27, 2018 Expiration Date of Development Order (The extension, reinstatement, exemption from expiration and revocation Lay be pursued in accordance with Section 26.308.010 of the City of Aspen Municipal Code.) Issued this 27th dav of August, 2015, by the City of Aspen Community Development Director. Chr ~*nifer ~0~lan, Community Development Deputy Director U Â£ 4 AFFIDAVIT OF PUBLIC NOTICE REQUIRED BY SECTION 26.304.070 AND CHAPTER 26.306 ASPEN LAND USE CODE ADDRESS OF PROPERTY: '~~~râ‚¬4 rÂ»~ Rt?yov 2 60 5 - 929- Aspen, CO STATE OF COLORADO ) ) SS. County of Pitkin ) I, ,~44Â£~a~'t eb c 5'L-/7 (name, please print) being or representing an Applicant to the City of Aspen, Colorado, hereby personally certify that I have complied with the public notice requirements of Section 26.304.060 (E) or Section 26.306.010 (IE) of the Aspen Land Use Code in the following manner: Publication of notice: By the publication in the legal notice section of an. official paper or a paper of general circulation in the City of Aspen no later than fourteen (14) days after final approval of a site specific development plan. A copy of the publication is attached hereto. L Publication ofnotice: By the publication in the legal notice section of an official paper or a paper of general circulation in the City of Aspen no later than fifteen (15) days after an Interpretation has been rendered. A copy of the publication is attached hereto. .Al/\Nela <3>oc,----1 Signadire The foregoing "Affidavit of Notice" was acknowledged before me this 27 day of,*M,~ U,SP , 200.5 b~ .14,15 J â‚¬- /L--7 WITN-ESS MY HAND AND OFFICIAL SEAL My commission expires: 411Â©1147 fojÂ« Foo_d -RAGen* _ Notary Public ATTACHMENTS: - L KAREN REED PATTERSON NOTARY PUBLIC COPY OF THE PUBLICATION STATE OF COLORADO NOTARY ID #19964002767 My Commission Expires February 15, 2016 44 4 J PUBUC NOTICE Of DEVELOPMENT APPROVAL Notice is hereby given to the general public of the approval of a site specific development plan, and the creation of a vested property right pursuant to the Land Use Code of the City of Aspen and Title 24, Article 68, Colorado Revised Statutes, pertain- ing to the following legally described property: PARCEL 1, Woodstone Inn Condominiums, ac- cording to the Condominium Map thereof filed March 11,1983 in Plat Book 14 at Page 45 through 49, inclusive at Reception No. 248609 and as fur- ther defined and described in the Condominium Declaration for Woodstone Inn Condominiums re- corded March 11, 1983 in Book 441 at Page 814 at Reception No, 248608: PARCEL 11, a non-exclu sive easement and right-ot-way for the purpose of ingress and egress over and across that certain parcel described In Long Form easement Agree- 0 ment unrecorded, notice of which is given by Short Form Easement Agreement recorded April 25, 1977 in Book 327 at Page 777: and PARCEL Ill, Encroachment License Agreements for the pur- poses stated therein recorded September 3,1976 in Book 316 at Page 232, April 30, 1982 in Book 425 at Page 907, in Book 425 at Page 913, in Book 425 at Page 919, and recorded November 13, 1985 in Book 498 at Page 909, County of Pitkin, State of Colorado. The property is commonly known as 709 E Durant, the Sky Hotel. Parcel ID 273718280001, owned by Aspen Club Lodge Properties LLC, 1101 30th Street, NW, Suite 150, Washington, DC 20007. Approval has been given for Planned Development, Commercial Design, Review, and GMC)S for the redevelopment of the Timeshare, Subdivision, Conditional Use, Special 1 0085'37 ! Al 033il tÂ·1 rÂ« properly with a mixed-use lodge. City Council ap- proval was granted on February 9, 2015 through 1:919 79#7 Â· 1 Â· Ordinance 39, Series 2014. Planning & Zoning Commission approvai was granted on August 18, 2015 through P&Z Resolution 17, Series of 2015. i ~ For additional information contact Jessica Garrow, at the City of Aspen Community Development Dept. 130 S. Galena St, Aspen, Colorado (970) 429-2780, or Jessica.Garrow@cityofaspen.corn. plw:U#'Ae Aspen Times on August 27, 2015 RESOLUTION NO. 17 (SERIEK OF 2015) A RESOLUTION OF THE ASPEN PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION GRANTING FINAL COMMERCIAL DESIGN REVIEW APPROVAL, AND PLANNED DEVELOPMENT - DETAILED REVIEW APPROVAL, FOR A SITE SPECIFIC DEVELOPMENT PLAN FOR THE SKY HOTEL SUBDIVISION/PLANNED DEVELOPMENT LOCATED ON PROPERTY COMMONLY KNOWN AS 709 E DURANT AVENUE, CITY OF ASPEN, PITKIN COUNTY, COLORADO. Parcel ID: 2737-182-80-001 WHEREAS, the Community Development Department received an application for the Sky I Iotel Subdivision/PD (the Application) from Aspen Club Lodge Properties, LLC (Applicant), represented by Sunny Vann of Vann Associates for the following land use review approvals: â€¢ Planned Development - Project Review, pursuant to Land Use Code Chapter 26.445. â€¢ Timeshare Review. pursuant to Land Use Code Chapter 26.590. â€¢ Subdivision Review. pursuant to Land Use Code Chapter 26.480. â€¢ Growth Management Review - Replacement of Existing Commercial and Lodge Development, pursuant to Land Use Code Chapter 26.470. â€¢ Growth Management Review -Lodge Development, pursuant to Land Use Code Chapter 26.470. â€¢ Growth Management Review - New Free Market Residential Units. pursuant to Land Use Code Chapter 26.470. â€¢ Growth Management Review - Affordable Housing, pursuant to Land Use Code Chapter 26.470. â€¢ Special Review to establish Parking. pursuant to Land Use Code Chapter 26.430. â€¢ Conditional Use for commercial space. pursuant to Land Use Code Chapter 26.425. â€¢ Commercial Design Review. pursuant to Land Use Code Section 26.412; and. WHEREAS, all code citation references are to the City of Aspen Land Use Code in effect on the day of initial application - June 23,2014. as applicable to this Project; and. WHEREAS, the Application for the Sky Hotel Subdivision/PD initially proposed: â€¢ 102 hotel units with 102 keys and 103 bedrooms in 44.634 square feet o f net livable area. â€¢ 3,380 square feet of accessory commercial net leasable space. â€¢ 8 free-market residential units (plus 4 lock-offs) in 14.622 square feet o f net livable area. â€¢ 5 affordable housing units in 4,301 square feet of net livable area. â€¢ 83 parking spaces (70 of which are in an underground facility, and 13 of which are at-grade spaces dedicated to the Aspen Alps.): and. RECEPTION#: 622954, 09/02/2015 at Sky Hotel Planned Development & Commercial Design 02:57:07 PM, Planning and Zoning Commission 1 OF 9, R $51.00 Doc Code RESOLUTION Reso No. 17, Series 2015 Janice K. Vos Caudill, Pitkin County, CO Page 1 of 8 WHEREAS, the Community Developnient Department received referral comments from the Aspen Consolidated Sanitation District. City Engineering. Building Department, Fire Protection District, Environmental Health Department, Parks Department, Parking Department, Aspen/Pitkin County Housing Authority, Public Works Department, and the Transportation Department as a result of the Development Review Committee meeting: and, WHEREAS, pursuant to Section 26.470.040.C.7. Affordable Housing. of the Land Use Code, a recommendation from the Aspen/Pitkin County Housing Authority is required and a recommendation for approval by the board was provided at their July 16. 2014. regular meeting; and, WHEREAS, said referral agencies and the Aspen Community Development Department reviewed the proposed Application and recommended approval with conditions: and, WHEREAS, the Planning and Zoning Commission reviewed the Application at a duly noticed public hearing on September 16. 2014, and continued to October 7. 2014 and October 21. 2014, during which the recommendations of the Community Development Director and comments from the public were requested and heard by the Planning and Zoning Commission ; and, WHEREAS, in response to feedback from the public. Community Development staff. and the Planning and Zoning Commission on October 7. 2014, the Applicant revised the proposal to include: â€¢ 106 hotel units with 106 keys and 107 bedrooms in 47.092 square feet of net livable area. â€¢ 3,380 square feet of accessory commercial net leasable space. â€¢ 6 free-market residential units (plus 2 lock-offs) in 10.322 square feet of net livable area. â€¢ 5 affordable housing units in 4,301 square feet of net livable area. ' 83 parking spaces (70 of which are in an underground facility, and 13 of which are at-grade spaces dedicated to the Aspen Alps.): and. WHEREAS, during a duly noticed public hearing on October 21. 2014. the Planning and Zoning Commission approved Resolution 15. Series of 2014, by a four to one (4-1) vote recommending City Council approve the Sky Hotel Subdivision/PD Application and all necessary land use reviews, with conditions; and, WHEREAS. the City Council reviewed the Application at a duly noticed public hearing on December 1,2014. and continued to December 8, 2014, January 12, 2015, and February 9, 2015, during which the recommendations of the Community Development Director and comments from the public were requested and heard by the City Council; and, WHEREAS, in response to feedback from the public and City Council on December 1, 2014, the Applicant revised the proposal to include: â€¢ 104 hotel units, 104 keys and 117 bedrooms in 56,509 square feet of net livable area. Sky Hotel Planned Development & Commercial Design Planning and Zoning Commission Reso No. 17, Series 2015 Page 2 of 8 â€¢ 3.480 square feet of commercial net leasable space. â€¢ 2 affordable housing units in 1.714square feet of net livable area. â€¢ 66.5 parking spaces (54 of which are in an underground facility, and 12.5 of which are at-grade spaces dedicated to the Aspen Alps.): and, WHEREAS, during a public hearing on February 9. 2015, the Aspen City Council approved Ordinance No. 39, Series 2014, by a four to zero (4-0) vote, approving with conditions the Sky Hotel Subdivision and all necessary land use reviews: and, WHEREAS, the Community Development Department approved an Administrative Planned Development - Project Review Amendment (Reception No 621405) to correct certain setback requirements contained in Exhibit A to Ordinance 39 Series of2014; and WHEREAS. all required public noticing was provided as evidenced by an affidavit of public notice submitted to the record a public open house was provided by the applicant to meet the requirements of Land Use Code Section 26.304.035, and the public was provided a thorough and full review o f the proposed development; and, WHEREAS, during a duly noticed public hearing on August 18, 2015, the Planning and Zoning Commission approved Resolution 17, Series of 2015. by a six to zero (6-0) vote granting Final Commercial Design approval. and Planned Development - Detailed Review approval, with the recommended conditions of approval listed hereinafter. NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVEDBY THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF ASPEN, COLORADO THAT: Section 1: Approval Pursuant to the procedures and standards set forth in Title 26 of the Aspen Municipal Code. the Planning and Commission hereby grants the Sky Hotel Planned Development - Detailed Review approval and Final Commercial Design Review. subject to the conditions of approval as listed herein and as described in City Council Ordinance No. 39, Series of 2014. Section 2: Dimensions Dimensions were approved in Ordinance 39, Series 2015, and amended herein. The final approved dimensions are attached hereto as Exhibit A. As stated in Section 1 of Ordinance 39, Series 2015. minor variations may be approved subject to review by the Community Development Department. Section 3: Public Amenity Spaces A total of 11,367 sq ft of public amenity space shall be on the property. This is through a combination of at-grade. second floor deck, and rooftop deck spaces. These spaces shall meet all requirements of Ordinance 39, Series 2015. Section 4: Materials The materials as represented at the August 18,2015 P&Z meeting. and attached as Exhibit B. are approved. Sky Hotel Planned Development & Commercial Design Planning and Zoning Commission Reso No. 17, Series 2015 Page 3 of 8 1 Section 5: Subdivision/PD Plat and Agreement The Applicant shall submit a Subdivision/PD agreement (hereinafter "Agreement") that meets the requirements of the Land Use Code within 180 days of final approval. The 180 days shall commence upon the granting of Final Commercial Design and Planned Development - Detail Review approvals by the Planning & Zoning Commission. The recordation documents shall be submitted in accordance with the requirements of Section 26.490 Approval Documents of the Land Use Code. a. In accordance in Section 26.490.040. Approval Documents Content and Form, the following plans are required in the Approved Plan Set: 1. Final Commercial Design Review/ Architectural Character Plan. 2. Planned Development Detail Review Plans. 3. Public Amenity Plans. 4. Public Infrastructure Plan. 5. Final Transportation Impact Analysis (TIA). 6. Subdivision Plat. The subdivision plat shall show a non-exclusive easement for ingress and egress across the easterly portion of the Applicant's property between Durant Avenue and the alley in Block 107, for the use of Chateau Chaumont and Chateau DuMont condominiums, as well as show the parking area currently used by the Aspen Alps 100 Building located along the southerly portion of the Applicants property. b. In accordance with Section 26.490.050. Development Agreements, a Development Agreement shall be entered into with the City. c. In accordance with Section 26.490.060, Financial and Site Protection Requirements, the applicant shall provide a site protection guarantee and a site enhancement guarantee. d. In accordance with Section 26.490.070, Pedbrmance Guarantees, the following guarantees are required in an amount equal to 150% of the current estimated cost o f the improvement: 1. Landscape Guarantee. 2. Public Facilities and Public Infrastructure Guarantee. 3. Storm Water and Drainage Improvements Guarantee. The timeshare docs and condo map referenced e. and f., below, shall not be prepared until substantial completion of construction and should not be included in the 180 day deadline. They will be required prior to CO. e. In accordance with Section 26.590, Timeshare, the Applicant shall incorporate the requirements and restrictions of the City's Timeshare Regulations into the final timeshare instruments, including: 1. State requirements. 2. Owner occupancy limitations and disclosure of the public rental requirement, 3. Provisions for reserve funds for ongoing maintenance, 4. Prohibited practices and uses, Sky Hotel Planned Development & Commercial Design Planning and Zoning Commission Reso No. 17, Series 2015 Page 4 0 f 8 5. Limits on marketing techniques, 6. A prohibition against long-term storage of owner vehicles. and 7. Prohibitions on offering non-Aspen gifts within a marketing plan. f. A Condominium Map shall be competed for the development in accordance with Section 26.480.050(A). Condominiumization. The Condominium Map shall depict the non-exclusive easement described in Section 8.a.6. Section 6: Engineering Department The Applicants design shall be compliant with all sections of the City of Aspen Municipal Code, Title 21 and all construction and excavation standards published by the Engineering Department. 6.1. Sidewalks. All sidewalks shall meet minimum sidewalk width per Engineering requirements and shall be detached. The sidewalk along Durant as it ties into the east property shall be approved by the Engineering Department. The drop off area shall have an ADA accessible route which complies with ICC/ANSI Section 503. 6.2 Streets and Sight Triangles. South Spring Street must maintain minimum road width with the proposed hotel drop off area and median. A sight triangle analysis for the driveway access point demonstrating adequate visibility for vehicles is required at building permit. 6.3 Snow Storage. Snow is not permitted to shed off roofs onto neighboring properties. Any snow which sheds off roofs must remain onsite. 6.4 Excavation Stabilization. This section shall supersede Section 9.3 of Ordinance 39. Series 2015. Due to the proximity of the neighboring property and the excavation of the building, an excavation stabilization plan shall be submitted to the Engineering Department at building permit submittal. 6.5 Construction Management Plan. The Applicant shall work with the Engineering Department to ensure the final Construction Management Plan meets all City requirements. Section 7: Building Project shall meet adopted Building Code in place at the time of building permit submittal. The project shall be subject to the 2015 IECC Energy Code. Pursuant to Land Use Code Section 26.575.020(F)(3)(c), height is measured to the first layer of exterior sheathing or weatherproofing membrane. Any additional insulation and associated material finishes requirements imposed by the 2015 IECC Energy Code shall constitute "other veneer treatments" for the purposes of calculating height pursuant to Land Use Code Section 26.575.020(F)(3)(c). Section 8: Transportation The TIA report submitted with the application and dated July 9, 2015 is adopted. Section 9: Parks Sky Hotel Planned Development & Commercial Design Planning and Zoning Commission Reso No. 17, Series 2015 Page 5 of 8 The project shall comply with Title 13 of the Municipal Code. Planting of trees is not allowed in Bio-Retention ponds, nor can the location of these ponds affect the long term health o f any trees that are proposed. Tree species must be identified in the building permit and approved by the City Forester. The location of tree plantings shall be approved by the City Forester during the building permit review. Larger planting stripes or Silva cells along the northwest corner of the property and the pull out area on Spring Street are required. Planting areas that will allow trees to grow to maturity are required. Utilities shall be located away from tree plantings to the greatest extent practical. Alllandscaping shall be approved by the Parks Department at building permit. Section 10: Aspen Consolidated Sanitation District Requirements Permanent improvements are prohibited in sewer easements or right o f ways. Landscaping plans will require approval by ACSD where soft and hard landscaping may impact public ROW or easements to be dedicated to the district. The applicant has shown an 8- sanitary sewer service on their plans to serve this development. The applicant will be required to deposit funds with the District to install a manhole to accommodate the propose 8" sanitary sewer service. Ihe applicant must provide locations and sizing of interceptors to the District prior to the District approving service to this development. Glycol heating and snow melt systems must be designed to prohibit and discharge of glycol to any portion of the public and private sanitary sewer system. The glycol storage areas must have approved containment facilities. Section 11: Outdoor Lighting and Signage All outdoor lighting and all signage shall meet the requirements of the Aspen Municipal Code. This shall be verified at building permit review. Section 12: Vested Rights The development approvals granted herein shall constitute a site-specific development plan vested for a period of three (3) years from the date of issuance of a development order. However, any failure to abide by any of the terms and conditions attendant to this approval shall result in the forfeiture of said vested property rights. Unless othenvise exempted or extended, failure to properly record all plats and agreements required to be recorded, as specified herein, within 180 days of the effective date of the development order shall also result in the forfeiture of said vested property rights and shall render the development order void within the meaning of Section 26.104.050 (Void permits). Zoning that is not part of the approved site-specific development plan shall not result in the creation o f a vested property right. No later than fourteen (14) days following final approval of all requisite reviews necessary to obtain a development order as set forth in this Ordinance, the City Clerk shall cause to be published in a newspaper of general circulation within the jurisdictional boundaries of the City of Aspen. a notice advising the general public of the approval of a site specific development plan and creation of a vested property right pursuant to this Title. Such notice shall be substantially in the following form: Sky Hotel Planned Development & Commercial Design Planning and Zoning Commission Reso No. 17, Series 2015 Page 6 of 8 Notice is hereby given to the general public o f the approval o f a site specific development plan. and the creation of a vested property right, valid for a period of three (3) years, pursuant to the Land Use Code of the City of Aspen and Title 24. Article 68. Colorado Revised Statutes. pertaining to the following described property: 709 + Durant, Sky Hotel Subdirision/PD. City of Aspen. Colorado. Nothing in this approval shall exempt the development order from subsequent reviews and approvals required by this approval or the general rules. regulations and ordinances of the City of Aspen provided that such reviews and approvals are not inconsistent with this approval. The approval granted hereby shall be subject to all rights of referendum and judicial review: the period of time permitted by law for the exercise of such rights shall not begin to run until the date of publication of the notice of final development approval as required under Section 26.304.070(A). The rights of referendum shall be limited as set forth in the Colorado Constitution and the Aspen Home Rule Charter. Section 13: All material representations and commitments made by the Applicant pursuant to the development proposal approvals as herein awarded. whether in public hearing or documentation presented before the Community Development Department, the Planning and Zoning Commission. or the Aspen City Council are hereby incorporated in such plan development approvals and the same shall be complied with as if fully set forth herein. unless amended by other specific conditions or an authorized authority. Section 14: This Resolution shall not affect any existing litigation and shall not operate as an abatement of any action or proceeding now pending under or by virtue of the ordinances repealed or amended as herein provided. and the same shall be conducted and concluded under such prior ordinances. Section 15: If any section. subsection. sentence, clause. phrase. or portion of this Resolution is for any reason held invalid or unconstitutional in a court of competent jurisdiction. such portion shall be deemed a separate, distinct and independent provision and shall not affect the validity of the remaining portions thereof. FINALLY, adopted, passed and approved this 18th day of August, 2015. Approved as to form: Approved as to content: <james R True, City Attorney Ryan Walterschied, Chair Attest: U Et Cindy Klob, Records Manager Sky i lotel Planned Development & Commercial Design Planning and Zoning Commission Reso No. 17, Series 2015 Page 7 of 8 Attachments: Exhibit A: Approved Dimensional Requirements Exhibit B: Approved Materials Exhibit A: Approved Dimensional Requirements 104 units and 117 bedrooms in Lodge Units and Net Livable 56,509 sq ft net livable Commercial Net Leasable 3,480 sq ft net leasable Affordable Housing Units and Net Livable 2 units in 1,714 sq ft net livable Minimum Gross Lot Size (sq ft) 42,645 sq ft Minimum Net Lot Size (sq ft) (includes vacated right- 37,113 sq ft of-way) Minimum Lot Width (feet) 116 ft Above Grade - 10 ft Minimum Front Yard Setback (feet) Below Grade - 5 ft Above Grade, East Wing - 6.4 ft Minimum East Side Yard Setback (feet) Above Grade, West Wing - 5 ft Below Grade - 5 ft Above Grade - 5 ft Minimum West Side Yard Setback (feet) Below Grade - 5 ft Above Grade - 5 ft Minimum Rear Yard Setback (feet) Below Grade - 5 ft Maximum Height (feet) 40 feet Maximum Height for mechanical 50 feet Public Amenity Space 11,367 sq ft Allowed Floor Area Overall 86,403 sq ft (2.33:1)* Lodge 68,824 sq ft (1.85:1) Commercial 3,377 sq ft (.09:1) Affordable Housing 1,463 sq ft (.04:1) Non-Unit Space 12,739 sq ft (.34:1) Parking Garage: 54 Spaces Minimum Off-Street Parking Surface Spaces: 12.5 spaces for Aspen Alps Minimum Trash/Recycle Area 560 sq ft *Minor changes during building permit review may be approved such that they do not exceed those in the underlying zone district Sky Hotel Planned Development & Commercial Design Planning and Zoning Commission Reso No. 17, Series 2015 Page 8 of 8 r. 3 - rowland+broughbn U -- --,1.1 l Cl. 1-1 I y 1-1Â°+ 1 1 1 1 10&97> + Â£-2--**-â€ž+21 [1][BI15*ftÂ·-- 3 1----1.-1 Timm-TI O r=NE*mil=t==m~ r--1 , acc. 4 . ' L___1 gh .A o [n[I] EAM MER -egr>-v;;~dit miti~ iriii,FFiâ€ž.iri,11 ~o. lilli -> 11!Ul - --pROF ---1.it-- FE,rl=**i~~.-T-T-r- ----------- -'Di%-*- 40,4.. U . ....ne-â€ž , 1 LU Fi , I Col.= 07.14 26~ DETALM 1 E ..... rae== F m[B F - ~E19RumL_Ell=L-I-G'-lIlli 11#Zffr' 4,1-~ - N ~PLICA.2- - ........ 1 r HOR=.ALWOOD= 14â€¢ HOM,00,rt. =. /DING . VERTIC.4. WOOD I.. -co ITCNEVENEER METAL /00.0 .0/0./. t . 4" ./. -4,4- W~ 4 ikiP Â·Â· ~' 4 0/1 2 d':464 - 23' ,Â© j:~li~ 4 I Mbl SKY HOTEL 4 - .Rul 1,51"8/#//mS.J.. , r A........ 70*. O*~U~TAVE 1-lirâ€¢ - ... -~1 f>~g $ r 1 PROPOSED SKY ...27. HOTEL MATERIALS ICAL: Al --*. - PD4.3 Â« b RECEPTION#: 621405, 07/An/2015 at 11:14:21 AM, 1 OF 2, R $1 0 Janice K. Vos Caudill --tkin County, CO 9. NOTICE OF APPROVAL FOR ADMINISTRATIVE PLANNED DEVELOPMENT - PROJECT REVIEW AMENDMENT FOR THE PROPERTY LOCATED AT 709 E DURANT AVE (THE SKY HOTEL), CITY OF ASPEN, PITKIN COUNTY, COLORADO. Parcel ID: 2737-182-80-001 APPLICANT: Aspen Club Lodge Properties, LLC REPRESENTATIVE: Scott McHale, Rowland + Broughton Architects Sunny Vann, Vann Associates SUBJECT & SITE OF AMENDMENT: The Sky Hotel is zoned Lodge (L) and includes a Planned Development (PD) Overlay. The PD was approved in Ordinance 39, Series of 2014 as part of an application for redevelopment of the property. This is an administrative PD - Project Review Amendment to correct the setbacks included in Ordinance 39, Series of 2014. BACKGROUND AND PROJECT SUMMARY: The Sky Hotel received approval from City Council (Ordinance 39, Series 2014) on February 9, 2015 to redevelop the property with a new lodge. Part of the initial application included a request to vary the setbacks allowed in the Lodge zone district. In December of 2014, the applicant rescinded this request and provided updated drawings to illustrate that the building would meet the setbacks allowed in the Lodge zone district. While the drawings were updated, Exhibit A to the Ordinance was not. Exhibit A includes all of the approved dimensions for the project. Section 1 of Ordinance 39, Series 2014, states, in part, that "The dimensions shall be those outlined in Exhibit A. Minor variations may be approved subject to review by the Community Development Department." The applicant has requested that the Community Development Department approve a "minor variation" to the setbacks included in Ordinance 39's Exhibit A to ensure the approved dimensions match the approved drawings. The correct setbacks should be as follows: MINIMUM SETBACKS Above Grade East Side Yard, West Wing - 5 Feet East Side Yard, East Wing - 6.4 Feet West Side Yard - 5 Feet Below Grade East Side Yard, East Wing - 5 Feet East Side Yard, West Wing - 5 Feet All other setbacks - As included in Exhibit A to Ordinance 39, Series 2014 Sky Hotel, Ordinance 39 (Series 2014) Project Review Amendment Page I of2 RECEPTION#: 621405, 09/2015 at 11:14:21 AM, 2 OF 2, Janice K. Vos Caudil litkin County, CO STAFF EVALUATION: [he proposed building is identical to that approved by City Council in Ordinance 39, Series 2014. An administrative error resulted in Exhibit A not being updated to match the final approved drawings. This is a technical error that does not change the overall project or approval by City Council. The Ordinance provides the Community Development Department the ability to make minor modifications to the dimensional requirements administratively. In addition, the setbacks meet those allowed in the Lodge zone district. DECISION: The Community Development Director finds the proposed PD Amendment is consistent with the applicable review criteria and thereby, APPROVES the amendment. The revised setbacks are as follows: Above Grade - 10 ft 1 Minimum Front Yard Setback (feet) Below Grade - 5 ft Above Grade, West Wing - 5 ft Minimum East Side Yard Setback (feet) Above Grade, East Wing -6.4 ft Below Grade - 5 ft Above Grade - 5 ft Minimum West Side Yard Setback (feet) Below Grade - 5 ft Above G rade - 5 ft Minimum Rear Yard Setback (feet) Below Grade - 5 ft APPROVED BY: 66*40 7/4/1~5 Jennifer Ph410 Date / Community Development Deputy Director , Sky Hotel, Ordinance 39 (Series 2014) Project Review Amendment Page 2 of 2 RECEPTION#: 617367, 02/12/2015 at 11:07:35 AM, A 1 OF 14, R $76.00 Doc Code ORDINANCE Ordinance No. 39 ~ Janice K. Vos Caudill, Pitkin County, CO (SERIES OF 2014) AN ORDINANCE OF THE ASPEN CITY COUNCIL GRANTING CONCEPTUAL COMMERCIAL DESIGN REVIEW APPROVAL, CONDITIONAL USE APPROVAL, SPECIAL REVIEW APPROVAL, PLANNED DEVELOPMENT - PROJECT REVIEW APPROVAL, SUBDIVISION APPROVAL, TIMESHARE APPROVAL, AND GROWTH MANAGEMENT APPROVALS, FOR A SITE SPECIFIC DEVELOPMENT PLAN FOR THE SKY HOTEL SUBDIVISION/PLANNED DEVELOPMENT LOCATED ON PROPERTY COMMONLY KNOWN AS 709 E DURANT AVENUE, CITY OF ASPEN, PITKIN COUNTY, COLORADO. Parcel ID: 2737-182-80-001 WHEREAS, the Community Development Department received an application for the Sky Hotel Subdivision/PD (the Application) from Aspen Club Lodge Properties, LLC (Applicant), represented by Sunny Vann of Vann Associates for the following land use review approvals: â€¢ Planned Development - Project Review, pursuant to Land Use Code Chapter 26.445. â€¢ Timeshare Review, pursuant to Land Use Code Chapter 26.590. â€¢ Subdivision Review, pursuant to Land Use Code Chapter 26.480. â€¢ Growth Management Review - Replacement of Existing Commercial and Lodge Development, pursuant to Land Use Code Chapter 26.470. â€¢ Growth Management Review -Lodge Development, pursuant to Land Use Code Chapter 26.470. â€¢ Growth Management Review - New Free Market Residential Units, pursuant. to Land Use Code Chapter 26.470. â€¢ Growth Management Review - Affordable Housing, pursuant to Land Use Code Chapter 26.470. â€¢ Special Review to establish Parking, pursuant to Land Use Code Chapter 26.430. â€¢ Conditional Use for commercial space, pursuant to Land Use Code Chapter 26.425. â€¢ Commercial Design Review, pursuant to Land Use Code Section 26.412; and, WHEREAS, all code citation references are to the City of Aspen Land Use Code in effect on the day of initial application - June 23,2014, as applicable to this Project; and, WHEREAS, the Application for the Sky Hotel Subdivision/PD initially proposed: â€¢ 102 hotel units with 102 keys and 103 bedrooms in 44,634 square feet of net livable area. â€¢ 3,380 square feet of accessory commercial net leasable space. â€¢ 8 free-market residential units (plus 4 lock-offs) in 14,622 square feet of net livable area. â€¢ 5 affordable housing units in 4,301 square feet of net livable area. City Council Ordinance No. 39, Series 2014 Page 1 of 14 â€¢ 83 parking spaces (70 of which are in an underground facility, and 13 of which are at-grade spaces dedicated to the Aspen Alps.); and, WHEREAS, the Community Development Department received referral comments from the Aspen Consolidated Sanitation District, City Engineering, Building Department, Fire Protection District, Environmental Health Department, Parks Department, Parking Department, Aspen/Pitkin County Housing Authority, Public Works Department, and the Transportation Department as a result of the Development Review Committee meeting; and, WHEREAS, pursuant to Section 26.470.040.C.7, Affordable Housing, of the Land Use Code, a recommendation from the Aspen/Pitkin County Housing Authority is required and a recommendation for approval by the board was provided at their July 16,2014, regular meeting; and, WHEREAS, said referral agencies and the Aspen Community Development Department reviewed the proposed Application and recommended approval with conditions; and, WHEREAS, pursuant to Chapter 26.445 of the Land Use Code, Planned Development - Project Review approval may be granted by the City Council at a duly noticed public hearing after considering recommendations by the Planning and Zoning Commission, the Community Development Director, and relevant referral agencies; and, WHEREAS, pursuant to Chapter 26.480 of the Land Use Code, Subdivision approval may be granted by the City Council at a duly noticed public hearing after considering recommendations by the Planning and Zoning Commission, the Community Development Director, and relevant referral agencies; and, WHEREAS, pursuant to Chapter 26.590 of the Land Use Code, Final Timeshare approval may be granted by the City Council at a duly noticed public hearing after considering recommendations by the Planning and Zoning Commission, the Community Development Director, and relevant referral agencies; and, WHEREAS, pursuant to Chapter 26.304, Common Development Review Procedures, and Section 26.304.060.B.4, Modification of Review Procedures, all other necessary land use reviews, as identified herein, have been combined to be considered by the City Council at a duly noticed public hearing after considering recommendations by the Planning and Zoning Commission, the Community Development Director, and relevant referral agencies; and, WHEREAS, such combination of review procedures was done to ensure clarity of review, was accomplished with all required public noticing provided as evidenced by an affidavit of public noticing submitted to the record, and the public was provided a thorough and full review of the proposed development; and, WHEREAS, the Planning and Zoning Commission reviewed the Application at a duly noticed public hearing on September 16, 2014, and continued to October 7, 2014 and October 21, 2014, during which the recommendations of the Community Development Director and comments from the public were requested and heard by the Planning and Zoning Commission ; and, WHEREAS, in response to feedback from the public, Community Development staff, and the Planning and Zoning Commission on October 7, 2014, the Applicant revised the proposal to include: City Council Ordinance No. 39, Series 2014 Page 2 of ] 4 â€¢ 106 hotel units with 106 keys and 107 bedrooms in 47,092 square feet of net livable area. â€¢ 3,380 square feet of accessory commercial net leasable space. â€¢ 6 free-market residential units (plus 2 lock-offs) in 10,322 square feet of net livable area. â€¢ 5 affordable housing units in 4,301 square feet of net livable area. â€¢ 83 parking spaces (70 of which are in an underground facility, and 13 of which are at-grade spaces dedicated to the Aspen Alps.); and, WHEREAS, during a duly noticed public hearing on October 21, 2014, the Planning and Zoning Commission approved Resolution 15, Series of 2014, by a four to one (4-1) vote recommending City Council approve the Sky Hotel Subdivision/PD Application and all necessary land use reviews, with conditions; and, WHEREAS, on November 24,2014 the Aspen City Council approved Ordinance No. 39, Series 2014, on First Reading by a three to zero (3-0) vote; and, WHER-EAS, the City Council reviewed the Application at a duly noticed public hearing on December 1, 2014, and continued to December 8, 2014, January 12, 2015, and February 9, 2015, during which the recommendations of the Community Development Director and comments from the public were requested and heard by the City Council; and, WHEREAS, in response to feedback from the public and City Council on December 1, 2014, the Applicant revised the proposal to include: â€¢ 104 hotel units, 104 keys and 117 bedrooms in 56,509 square feet of net livable area. â€¢ 3,480 square feet of commercial net leasable space. â€¢ 2 affordable housing units in 1,714square feet of net livable area. â€¢ 66.5 parking spaces (54 of which are in an underground facility, and 12.5 of which are at-grade spaces dedicated to the Aspen Alps.); and, WHEREAS, during a public hearing on February 9, 2015, the Aspen City COUnCil approved Ordinance No. 39, Series 2014, by a four to zero (4-0) vote, approving with conditions the Sky Hotel Subdivision and all necessary land use reviews; and, WHEREAS, the Aspen City Council has reviewed and considered the development proposal under the applicable provisions of the Municipal Code as identified herein, has reviewed and considered the recommendation of the Planning and Zoning Commission, the Community Development Director, the applicable referral agencies, and has taken and considered public comment at a public hearing; and, WHEREAS, the City Council finds that the development proposal meets or exceeds all applicable development standards and that the approval of the development proposal, with conditions, is consistent with the goals and elements of the Aspen Area Community Plan; and, City Council Ordinance No. 39, Series 2014 Page 3 of 14 WHEREAS, the City Council finds that this Ordinance furthers and is necessary for the promotion of public health, safety, and welfare. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ASPEN AS FOLLOWS: Section 1: Approvals Pursuant to the procedures and standards set forth in Title 26 of the Aspen Municipal Code, the City Council hereby grants the Sky Hotel Planned Development - Project Review approval, Subdivision approval, Final Timeshare approval, Growth Management approvals, Special Review approval, Conditional Use approval, and Conceptual Commercial Design approval, for a Site Specific Development Plan for the Sky Hotel Subdivision/PD, subject to the conditions of approval as listed herein. The dimensions shall be those as outlined in Exhibit A. Minor variations may be approved subject to review by the Community Development Department. The Conditional Use approval shall allow for restaurant, retail, service, and ski locker uses. Section 2: Effectiveness of Ordinance 4, Series 2015 The Sky Hotel project shall be subject to the provisions of Ordinance 4, Series 2015. Section 3: Subsequent Reviews Pursuant to the procedures and standards set forth in Title 26 of the Aspen Municipal Code, the Applicant is required to obtain Final Commercial Design Review and Planned Development - Detail Review following approval of the reviews outlined herein. The applicant shall combine these applications, and they shall be made no later than one (1) year following approval of this ' Ordinance. Section 4: Timeshare Lodge Requirements A public rental requirement assuring that unused timeshare lodge rooms will be available to the general public. Such rental requirement shall be documented in the Sky Hotel Timeshare Documents and shall contain a provision that this requirement cannot be eliminated from the Condominium Declarations without approval from the City of Aspen City Council. Periodic audits, pursuant to Section 26.575.210, Lodge occupancy auditing, of the Land Use Code may be conducted. Section 5: Growth Management Allotments 5.1 Reconstruction Credits. Based on the existing Sky Hotel development, the Applicant is entitled to the following reconstruction credits, pursuant to Land Use Chapter 26.470. a. A total of 90 lodging bedroorns, equating to 180 lodge pillows, is credited toward the Project. b. A commercial reconstruction credit of 5,259 square feet of net leasable area is credited toward the Project. 5.2 Growth Management Allotments. The following growth management allotments are recommended to be granted to the Sky Hotel Project: a. 27 lodging bedrooms = 54 lodging pillows. Added to the reconstruction credits, the project represents 107 lodging bedrooms or 214 pillows. City Council Ordinance No. 39, Series 2014 Page 4 0 f 14 b. 2 units of affordable housing. Section 6: Affordable Housing 6.1 Mitigation Requirements. The project is proposed to include two (2) affordable housing rental units, including one (1) one-bedroom unit and one (1) two-bedroom unit. The mitigation required for the project is as follows: Lodge: Mitigate for the additional 27 lodge bedrooms @ 48.6% 27 lodge bedrooms * 0.6 FTEs = 16.2 FTEs generated 16.2 FTEs generated by lodge - 8 FTIE commercial credit = 8.2 FTEs generated 8.2 FTEs @ 48.6% mitigation = 3.98 FTEs required mitigation for lodge The proposed affordable housing units will provide housing for 4 FTEs, exceeding the mitigation requirement by 0.02 FTEs. 6.2 Affordable Housing Special Review. Special Review is granted for the finished floor level of the affordable housing units such that at least fifty percent (50%) of the finished floor of the units shall be located at or above finished grade. 6.3 Affordable Housing Conditions. The two (2) affordable housing units shall be deed restricted at Category 3, and shall meet the following conditions: a. The affordable housing units shall meet or exceed the minimum square footage for Category 3. b. The deed restriction shall be recorded for the affordable housing units prior to Certificate of Occupancy (CO) of the affordable housing units. The CO for the affordable housing units shall be issued at the same time or prior to the CO for the lodge, free-market residential units, and commercial space. c. All tenants shall be approved by APCHA prior to occupancy. d. Employees of the hotel shall be exempt from maximum assets and maximum income for the on-site units; however, the tenants shall not own any other property within the ownership exclusion zone and must work full time as defined in the APCHA Guidelines. e. Minimum occupancy shall be obtained for each unit, as defined in the APCHA Guidelines. f. The units shall not be vacant for longer than 45 days, unless APCHA notified as to why the unit has been left vacant. g. Washers and dryers shall be provided in each employee housing unit. h. Each affordable housing unit shall be assigned one parking space in the underground garage, and they shall not be the stacked spaced. City Council Ordinance No. 39, Series 2014 Page 5 of 14 i. The affordable housing units shall be rental units. The Condominium Declaration shall include language, to be reviewed and approved by APCHA, that should the affordable housing units become ownership units: a. They will be sold through the lottery system. b. The dues will be based on the assessed value of the deed-restricted units vs. the free-market unit as well as the square footage ofthe units; c. No common expenses will be charged to the deed-restricted owners, unless approved by APCHA. d. A separate HOA shall be created for the deed-restricted employee housing units. Section 7: Planned Development - Detail Review In addition to the general documents required as part of a Planned Development - Detail Review, the following items shall be required as part of the Application's Planned Development - Detail Review: a. An Outdoor I.ighting Plan, pursuant to section 26.575.150. b. An existing and proposed Landscaping Plan, identifying trees with diameters and values. c. A draft Construction Management Plan. d. A snow storage and snow shedding plan. Snow is not permitted to shed off roofs onto neighboring properties. Demonstrate that any snow which sheds off roofs will remain on-site. e. An updated and final Transportation Impact Analysis (TIA), including a monitoring plan. f. A final design plan for the Spring Street cul-de-sac and bump out, as outlined in Section 9.5 ofthis Ordinance. Section 8: Subdivision/PD Plat and Agreement The Applicant shall submit a Subdivision/PD agreement (hereinafter "Agreement") that meets the requirements of the Land Use Code within 180 days of final approval. The 180 days shall commence upon the granting of Final Commercial Design and Planned Development - Detail Review approvals by the Planning & Zoning Commission. The recordation documents shall be submitted in accordance with the requirements of Section 26.490 Approval Documents of the Land Use Code. a. In accordance in Section 26.490.040, Approval Documents Content and Form, the following plans are required in the Approved Plan Set: 1. Final Commercial Design Review/ Architectural Character Plan. 2. Planned Development Project and Detail Review Plans. 3. Public Amenity Plans. 4. Public Infrastructure Plan. 5. Final Transportation Impact Analysis (TIA), including a monitoring plan. 6. Subdivision Plat (the subdivision plat shall show a non-exclusive easement for ingress and egress across the easterly portion of the Applicant's property between Durant Avenue and the alley in Block 107, for the use of Chateau ' Chaumont and Chateau DuMont condominiums) b. In accordance with Section 26.490.050, Development Agreements, a Development Agreement shall be entered into with the City. City Council Ordinance No. 39, Series 20]4 Page 6 of 14 c. In accordance with Section 26.490.060, Financial and Site Protection Requirements, the applicant shall provide a site protection guarantee and a site enhancement guarantee. d. In accordance with Section 26.490.070, Performance Guarantees, the following guarantees are required in an amount equal to 150% of the current estimated cost of the improvement: 1. Landscape Guarantee. 2. Public Facilities and Public Infrastructure Guarantee. 3. Storm Water and Drainage Improvements Guarantee. The timeshare docs and condo map referenced e. and f., below, shall not be prepared until substantial completion of construction and should not be included in the 180 day deadline. They will be required prior to CO. e. In accordance with Section 26.590, Timeshare, the Applicant shall incorporate the requirements and restrictions of the City' s Timeshare Regulations into the final timeshare instruments, including: 1. State requirements, 2. Owner occupancy limitations and disclosure of the public rental requirement, 3. Provisions for reserve funds for ongoing maintenance, 4. Prohibited practices and uses, 5. Limits on marketing techniques, 6. A prohibition against long-term storage of owner vehicles, and 7. Prohibitions on offering non-Aspen gifts within a marketing plan. f. A Condominium Map shall be competed for the development in accordance with Section 26.480.050(A), Condominiumization. The Condominium Map shall depict the non-exclusive easement described in Section 8.a.6. Section 9: Engineering Department The Applicant's design shall be compliant with all sections of the City of Aspen Municipal Code, Title 21 and all construction and excavation standards published by the Engineering Department. 9.1 Drainage: The project shall meet the Urban Runoff Management Plan Requirements. A compliant drainage plan, including a 100-year mudflow analysis, must be submitted with a building permit application. A variance request will not be granted for exclusion of WCQV for Basin 8D. An inflow control mechanism could be proposed to limit the runoff that enters the BMP and allow any access runoff from offsite to bypass the structure. The vault access doors are proposed on the sidewalk at the hotel entrance. To improve the pedestrian experience, cover or hide the access lids or place them on the side of the sidewalk rather than the center. City Council Ordinance No. 39, Series 2014 Page 7 of 14 9.2 Sidewalk/Curb/Gutter: All sidewalk curb and gutter shall meet the Engineering Standards of City of Aspen Municipal Code Title 21. Pedestrian and vehicular traffic shall be distinguished in the alley. 9.3 Excavation Stabilization: Due to the proximity of the neighboring property and the excavation of the building, an excavation stabilization plan shall be submitted to the Engineering Department prior to building permit submittal. 9.4 CMP: a. The Construction Management Plan shall describe mitigation for parking, staging/encroachments, and truck traffic. b. The applicant will work with neighboring properties, including the Chateau Chaumont and Chateau Du Mont ("Neighbors") to obtain their input in the Construction Management Plan ("CMP") for the new Sky Hotel prior to presenting the CMP to the City of Aspen. The CMP will include the appointment of a specific construction team person as the contact for all Neighbors' questions and suggestions regarding the construction process. Neighbors desire uninterrupted access to the units and parking spaces within their condominiums. Applicant shall use good faith efforts to minimize interruptions for access for condominium owners and guests to the units and parking spaces within the condominiums. Applicant shall limit the most disruptive alley work directly in front of the Neighbors' condominium buildings to April 15 through June 15 and October 1 to November 20 of each year. The specific hours and details for access will be determined in the CMP. In recognition of the fact that the Neighbors' properties are immediately adjacent and very near the Sky Hotel, the CMP shall provide for real and significant noise and dust control measures. For example, watering exposed areas as reasonably necessary to suppress dust during all times of excavation, and the provision of physical sound barriers between the construction site and the Neighbors' properties to be erected prior to commencement of excavation and construction activities in order to mitigate sound impacts. These neighborhood agreements are intended to augment, rather than supersede City of Aspen construction regulations 9.5 Traffic Flow: The applicant shall address the cul-de-sac design and the Spring Street bump out as part of the Detail PD Review. The Spring Street cul-de-sac area and final design will require approval from Aspen Fire District, which may or may not require additional improvements to the cul-de-sac. The alley direction shall remain the same as today - entry from Durant and exit onto Original. Section 10: Fire Mitigation All codes adopted by the Aspen Fire Protection District shall be met. This includes but is not limited to access (International Fire Code (IFC), 2003 Edition,.Section 503), approved fire sprinkler and fire alarm systems (IFC, as amended, Section 903 and 907). The subgrade garage shall have adequate fire access. This shall be reviewed and approved by the Fire Marshall. Section 11: Parks Department City Council Ordinance No. 39, Series 2014 Page 8 of 14 Tree removal permits are required prior to issuance of a building permit for any demolition or significant site work. Mitigation for removals must be met by paying cash in lieu, planting on site, or a combination of both, pursuant to Chapter 13.20 of the City Municipal Code. Any plantings on the roof shall not qualify as mitigation. The applicant shall explore potential sites around the property to allow full maturation of trees. This shall be included as part of the PD Detail Review. A tree protection plan indicating the drip lines of each individual tree or groupings of trees remaining on site shall be included in the building pennit application for any demolition or significant site work. The plan shall indicate the location of protective zones for approval by the City Forester and prohibit excavation, storage of materials, storage of construction backfill, storage of equipment, and access over or through the zone by foot or vehicle. Section 12: Aspen Consolidated Sanitation District Requirements Service is contingent upon compliance with the District's rules, regulations, and specifications, which are on file at the District office. ACSD will review the approved Drainage plans to assure that clear water connections (roof, foundation, perimeter, patio drains) are not connected to the sanitary sewer system. On-site sanitary sewer utility plans require approval by ACSD. Permanent improvements are prohibited in sewer easements or right of ways. Landscaping plans will require approval by ACSD where soft and hard landscaping may impact public ROW or easements to be dedicated to the district. Old service lines must be excavated and abandoned at the main sanitary sewer line according to specific ACSD requirements and prior to micropiling. Soil nails are not allowed in rights of way. One tap is allowed for each building. Shared service line agreements may be required where more than one unit is served by a single service line. Below grade development may require installation of a pumping system. Above grade development shall flow by gravity. Plumbing plans for the pool and spa areas require approval of the drain size by the district. Glycol snowmelt and heating systems must have containment provisions and must preclude discharge to the public sanitary sewer system. Oil and Grease interceptors are required for all new and remodeled food processing establishments. Oil and Sand separators are required for public vehicle parking garages and vehicle maintenance facilities. Driveway entrance drains shall not be routed to ACSD's sanitary sewer infrastructure but rather be miligated in accordance with the City of Aspen's Urban Runoff Management Plan. Elevator shafts drains must flow thru Oil and Sand interceptor. Plans for interceptors, separators and containment facilities require submittal by the applicant and approval prior to a building permit application. Where additional development would produce flows that would exceed the planned reserve capacity of the existing system (collection system and or treatment system) an additional proportionate fee will be assessed to eliminate the downstream collection system or treatment City Council Ordinance No. 39, Series 2014 Page 9 of 14 capacity constraint. Additional proportionate fees would be collected over time from all development in the area of concern in order to fund the improvements needed. Where additional development would produce flows that would overwhelm the planned capacity o f the existing collection system and or treatment facility, the development will be assessed fees to cover the costs of replacing the entire portion of the system that would be overwhelmed. The District would fund the costs of constructing reserve capacity in the area of concern (only for the material cost difference for larger line). The Applicant shall furnish average and peak flows as well as service size prior to final design. The district will be able to respond with more specific comments and requirements once detailed building and utility plans are available. All ACSD total connection fees must be paid prior to the issuance of a building permit. Amendments to the above requirements agreed to in writing by the Applicant and the Aspen Consolidated Sanitation District shall supersede the sanitation requirements listed herein. Section 13: Environmental Health Department 13.1 Environmental Health Codes: The State of Colorado mandates specific mitigation requirements with regard to asbestos. Additionally, code requirements to be aware of when filing a building permit include: a prohibition on engine idling, regulation of fireplaces, fugitive dust requirements, noise abatement and pool designs. 13.2 Trash Requirements: The trash enclosures shall meet the minimum requirements outlined in Title 12. Prior to Detail PD Review, the Applicant shall identify the type of door to be installed on the trash enclosures for review and approval by the Environmental Health Department. Trash and deliveries shall be located off the Alley, as represented in plans presented to City Council. 13.3 Deliveries and Trash Removal: In the alley in Block 102, all deliveries and trash removal to and from the new Sky Hotel will occur between the hours of 8:00 a.m. and 7:00 p.m. except under the following circumstances: â€¢ Heavy snowfalls, acts of God, and force majeure â€¢ Food & Wine Classic, in which case, for 3 days prior to the event. these timelines may be exceeded to include the following hours: 7:00 a.m. to 10:00 p.m. â€¢ X-Games, in which case, for 3 days prior to the event these timelines may be exceeded to include the following hours: 7:00 a.m. to 10:00 p.m. â€¢ Christmas, in which case, for 3 days prior to Christmas Eve, these timelines may be exceeded to include the following hours: 7:00 a.m. to 10:00 p.m. â€¢ New Years, in which case, for 3 days prior to New Years' Eve, these timelines may be exceeded to include the following hours: 7:00 a.m. to 10:00 p.m. There shall be only two service doors at the delivery and trash removal area. Applicant shall schedule deliveries and trash removal at the Sky Hotel so that the alley in Block 102 is not unreasonably blocked by vehicles servicing the Sky Hotel, whether parked or waiting for other service vehicles to vacate the service bays. There shall be no unreasonable City Council Ordinance No. 39, Series 2014 Page 10 of 14 parking or idling of delivery or service vehicles in the access area between the alley in Block 102 and Durant Avenue on the Sky Hotel property adjacent to the Neighbors. The requirements o f Paragraph 13.3 shall take effect upon the issuance of the Final Certificate of Occupancy for the newly constructed Sky Hotel. 13.4 Noise Requirements: The Applicant shall be required to install a sound system to accommodate the acoustic needs for day-to-day operations as well as special events. Outside events are not permitted to bring in their own sound equipment, unless approved by the City through a Temporary Use Approval or a Special Events Permit. Noise levels shall meet City requirements at all times. The applicant shall explore an engineered solution that does not require .additional noise paneling. If an engineered solution is not achievable, removable transparent panels of no more than 4.5 feet in height (from the point of attachment) shall be permitted on the second floor and rooftop decks to help abate noise. These shall be removed within 24 hours following an event. In the event the removable panels are required for back-to-back events, they may be up for no longer than seven (7) continuous days. The Applicant shall meet with representative from the Community Development and Environmental Health Departments prior to submission of the main building permit to review the engineered solution options and evaluate the need for the noise panels referenced herein. The Sky Hotel will satisfy all of the time and decibel levels as required by the City regulations, as the same may be amended from time to time. Notwithstanding City Code limitations, the decibel level at the property line between the Sky Hotel and the Skegby Residence, as measured by the City of Aspen Enforcement Officer, shall not exceed 60 dB- A; and the decibel level at the property line between the Sky Hotel and the Neighbors shall not exceed 60 dB-A measured from the southwest corner of the Chateau Chaumont property line and the southwest corner of the 3rd floor courtyard balcony. In both cases such measurements shall be made using a sound level meter with the "A" weighting scale, set on "slow" response at any time there is activity on the roof top of the Sky Hotel. The noise level shall be assessed by taking numerous measurements over a number of minutes, and averaging those readings. The sound level meters must meet Type 2 specifications, according to ANSI S 1.4-2014 (or most current edition), and that sound level meter should be checked prior to measurements with a field calibrator. The noise measured must actually originate from the Sky Hotel. Any measurement must take into account and consider other background noises as required by the City code at the time of the event and measurement. All activity (except for the limited purposes of cleaning and removal of sound barriers) on the roof top areas of the Sky Hotel shall cease at the earlier of 10:00 p.m. or the time provided in the City regulations for the cessation of outdoor amplified music unless a Special Event Permit is obtained from the City by the Sky IIotel. There shall be no more than 15 Special Events per year for which Applicant or the Sky Hotel applies to the City for activity on the rooftop areas, and in no case shall Special Event activity on the roof top continue beyond 11:00 p.m. on any night. Provided, however, removal of sound barriers may be permitted to take place after the conclusion of any special event. Sound barriers will be limited to the areas shown on the plans dated January 26, 2015 submitted by the City Council Ordinance No. 39, Series 2014 Page 11 of 14 Applicant. The requirements of this section (Part 13.4) shall take effect upon the issuance ofthe Final Certificate of Occupancy for the newly constructed Sky Hotel. Section 14: Transportation Department The applicant shall implement the TDM and MMLOS mitigation measures, as outlined iii the application. CMP and TMP should be mindful of Rubey Park construction scheduled for spring- fall of 2015. Any closures/re-routes of Durant Street will need to be coordinated with this project. Regardless of construction date, closures/impacts to Durant Street should be limited and coordinated well in advance with RFTA and the public. An updated TIA is required at the PD- Detail Review and shall include a monitoring plan. Section 15: Parking 15.1 Fire Lane: The new cut-in loading zone on Spring shall continue to be a public loading zone for goods and passengers and the balance of Spring Street must remain a Fire Lane. 15.2 Required Parking: A total of fifty-four (54) spaces shall be provided in the sub-grade parking garage, seven (7) of which are stacked spaces. The project generated a requirement of forty-one (41) parking spaces. 15.3 Parking Garage Use: All spaces in the parking garage shall be limited to use by guests, tenants, and users of the Project, with the exception that up to thirteen (13) parking spaces in the parking garage may be made available to Chateau DuMont on a space available basis as determined by the Sky Hotel General Manager. Long-term car storage by any user of the garage shall be prohibited. 15.4 Affordable Housing Parking: Each affordable housing unit shall be assigned a parking space in the parking garage. These shall be located in a regular, non-stacked, parking space. Long-term storage of vehicles that are owned or used by the affordable housing tenants is permitted. Section 16: Water/Utilities Department The Applicant shall comply with the City of Aspen Water System Standards, with Title 25, and with the applicable standards of Title 8 (Water Conservation and Plumbing Advisory Code) of the Aspen Municipal Code, as required by the City of Aspen Water Department. All Water System Distribution standards in place at the time of building permit shall apply, and all tap fees will be assess per applicable codes and standards. Utility placement and design shall meet adopted City of Aspen standards. Section 17: Outdoor Lighting and Signage All outdoor lighting and all signage shall meet the requirements of the Aspen Municipal Code. Section 18: Public Amenity Spaces The Applicant has committed to providing a total of 12,408 sq ft of public amenity space (3,113 sq ft at grade, 1,553 sq ft on a second floor deck, and 7,742 sq ft on the roof top deck). These spaces shall be permanently accessible by the public through stairs and/or elevators. These spaces shall not be enclosed with temporary or permanent walls/windows or otherwise enclosed City Council Ordinance No. 39, Series 2014 Page 12 of 14 as interior conditioned space, with the exception of the noise barriers referenced in Section 13.3. Approved Public Amenity space on the roof shall be subject to a public access easement. Section 19: Building Department The Applicant shall meet all applicable building and accessibility codes in place at the time of building permit. The elevator accessing the roof is required to meet IBC accessibility requirements. The ground floor affordable housing units shall be provided with a compliant circulation path within the site that connects the units to the parking and the public right of way. Section 20: All material representations and commitments made by the Applicant pursuant to the development proposal approvals as herein awarded, whether in public hearing or documentation presented before the Planning and Zoning Commission or City Council, are hereby incorporated in such plan development approvals and the same shall be complied with as if fully set forth herein, unless amended by an authorized entity. Section 21: This Ordinance shall not affect any existing litigation and shall not operate as an abatement of any action or proceeding now pending under or by virtue of the ordinances repealed or amended as herein provided, and the same shall be conducted and concluded under such prior ordinances. Section 22: If any section, subsection, sentence, clause, phrase, or portion of this Ordinance is for any reason held invalid or unconstitutional in a court of competent jurisdiction, such portion shall be deemed a separate, distinct and independent provision and shall not affect the validity of the ' remaining portions thereof. INTRODUCED, READ AND ORDERED PUBLISIIED as provided by law, by the City Council of the City of Aspen on the 25th day ofNovember, 2014. (Stetren ~adrorÂ¢Nlayor *T#ST: BA k h \4Â»01 491Â« . Linda Manning, City Clerk FINALLY, adopted, passed ani approved this 9th day of February, 2015. APPROVED AS TO FORM: API*OVED Al Tb/cONTENT: ~ Ja:As R. True, City Attorney Steven Skaffron, MAyov C \j City Council OrJinance No, 39, Series 2014 Page 13 of 14 ATTEST: 044 4Â«1 Linda &,GnniTig, City Clerk ~ ATTACHMENTS: Exhibit A: Approved Dimensional Requirements Exhibit A: Approved Dimensional Requirements 104 units and 117 bedrooms in Lodge Units and Net Livable 56,509 sq ft net livable Commercial Net Leasable 3,480 sq ft net leasable Affordable Housing Units and Net Livable 2 units in 1,714 sq ft net livable Minimum Gross Lot Size (sq ft) 42,645 sq ft Minimum Net Lot Size (sq ft) 37,113 sq ft Minimum Net Lot Area per Free-Market dwelling unit 4,864 sq ft (sq ft) Minimum Lot Width (feet) 116 ft Minimum Front Yard Setback (feet) Above Grade - 10 ft Below Grade - 5 ft Above Grade - 6.4 ft East Wing; 2.8 ft Minimum East Side Yard Setback (feet) West Wi ng Below Grade - 10 ft Minimum West Side Yard Setback (feet) Above Grade - 13 ft Below Grade - 5 ft Minimum Rear Yard Setback (feet) Above Grade - 5 ft Below Grade - 5 ft Maximum Height (feet) 40 feet Maximum Height for mechanical 50 feet Public Amenity Space 11,798 sq ft (27.6%) Allowed Floor Area* Overall 91,552 sq ft (2.46:1)* Lodge 72,781 sq ft (1.96:1) Commercial 3,460 sq ft (.09:1) Affordable Housing 1,876 sq ft (.05:1) Parking Garage: 54 Spaces Minimum Off-Street Parking Surface Spaces: 12.5 spaces for Aspen Alps Minimum Trash/Recycle Area 560 sq ft *Minor changes during PD - Detail Review and/or building permit review may be approved such that they do not exceed those in the underlying zone district City Council Ordinance No. 39, Series 2014 Page 14 of 14 Ny(0\4 ?(68*TWD1 01 15/20\6 1 4 ->'4&Â£5:'2144:i...21 4 4 . 21" 4, ' A %* 2. 1 e 189 ze: 10 . 1% gRKA t 068 . ,1. 11. 61 3== . Â·./.I - ...:e 15-~r . 2.'L.. 1-or ~- l:Â· H SPRING & COOPER STREET PERSPECTIVE 4,-~:- 2 , 1.Â· - . 404 . ~1 r *ft.. r . 1 -I : 1 . 't' , '~3 43â€¢ '14~~ g '7 - . 4.19 4 .. 2 4-3 E . .11 u -161' rt + Â«zi.*~ t - r ..... 1.1,1 .. ...te<- j 4 mililillubbj;:11 2911"will ~-.1 -- MOUNTAIN CHALET - ASPEN. CO ZERMATT. SWITZERLAND _~ -*.F,~fS~mEtt~(,1~40~Â¥*~~f~ + 4 .174 67 2 .1 "OLIP AÂ·~F <47Â¢ 4 ..- 4 . ... J 7:Jift*f,il,%31 .41'..47**5 rei - .25 Ill~~~~~| ~k'6#8-~~30e1~~ 1 , i. r 1. 1 1 L . , ~41~ ~f ' Il'.~b*. 7, 1 f N J ill~ '-Esl -2 .bal . I k 11 I ii i i 1 . Â¥... Il]12'~~[itÂ·~Â· 14 - 1 L '11,1.... - m CHATEL FRANCE LECH. AUSTRIA SKI CHALET PRECEDENT IMAGES - 74' A 2. It . - I ILA . ' 0452 - - t: J*. , .e: 41 - rs G , ... .. - 42. NU ,- t. - 441 3 ./11 *6. e. 4 ' ,/~. 5 - -4- I i + --f ..C~- 9 1; Â· -I . - AC 8% . E-i. - n.6... .Ar~ DURANT & SOUTH SPRING ST - NORTHWEST VIEW Â·f " .in:Â»9%*b. 41--Ilr--- râ‚¬riff*K L. ..#.-/ 1 F:-2 4 li r. M EM-_eÂ·- Ill A,B. I 11 .1 n J....ad 91 _= â€ž - : 6#3 D. I. /:E ... . .142> h < ~ i. -0.74'AltÂ¥*Â¥5311/lisT 2%4 1 ---- lip..... =~.,i,~ lilli 4%-029#~ iÂ· ~ '1%: 7 - â€¢4 - C.72 . ,4 - Â· . . . I. - 1-t 0.- f.. .. .m . e.Â« t*I G.2..;7Â¥fla=*Lâ‚¬ - 4. 144- %'. -ic.2 6:= 1//m#Mr-- a --/,2-- 72â€ž - ip,1~1.........- " D. . - .7.% - -- 1- 4Â«*F,tizzli:r,321~-JA"83 1.> -7-2 WG=Â»z"t-- - 1 0- -- . 1 3/ iÂ©442-. ---- .--. V I !-mi~i,X/--4 - -#44' 2..E///-/~-~:-,1-.,'21 fi-wa' -i-- - -Ii-: ~-~~-â€¢â€¢1~g-74-4~%:I ~ 4, # 4 '.0. a 2.-A,7 . 4 - , 1 - ' Â£ 7- A ~ 12.,I . 0-24. ' ./i - .. -2 .~~..~~.L.r29~-0~~_ ~ .-:~ . .*,~ :. ~~. -.~ ..I- I - /3.-*.. . 44"7 5 GE .. 2 - #..=.W- 0'fEÂ»16/.06- Fl. -697.Lowig/4-4*557226=2#.ir 15&- lieÂ«1 . % k~A ~7=Z:. _-/2,5./--.'1=~~9~0 5 -1Â»â‚¬*.Â· '*7-2,0t=-= 2=1:j,99- -a.- Z._:--JT.~F -~ 7-'3 ~i ~-~I- -6~~for *42,+21- ~1Jy. itt -41 --Li~rL.f -3 4- 33--- -1... - SLin 4 -~-~'4*/jil-*:4_=twZ- -Â·f---I,4 -=Â·-:.,--c=Â·-51=7=9 --.9 - I . * -- 2 - r.i.* ACE"lo-,Iat-7.-3/3=-9-31=9**77**1~Fir---P~ .f-k --c- 7--1 -- -r.---â‚¬-1 4 W .C . ... 0 -I *4 . L - ...rk . . - 9 -0-* I *- . *. * . 9 -4 -1. . 2 - ..42. ---.1Â¢1~(f.Â«I- 1.+3- Â·Â· 1 - ... A . -/4 : i .r 4 4 J . I. t 14 - **744*. '1Â§'M==.- W... 5 1 v.-2 -= .... -8... D '14,4 â€¢ 1-4 4/ C !-95 g b 'L ../.Ii./.Ill""Ili//I/"Ili'll.415#./....Q<FIC~miligill - 14 . P 4- 'kj*bâ€¢ Â· 3:Ul':21.6 FWâ‚¬ Ill"22.- --JI'.8.i.zohw 6*-=a e *icA - -- - I -/Â·1* ~I.=j/:5*12:imma %11 1 4 7. 5/livfisa7 /2 -.P -0.- ff=.1, 0- lil- *~ I: 393 ~ c# 3.~ 2- -;143*-:pi i--~med,5**~rfÂ£90 m i -~14'Fr--4'"'~-- -1- - 'r- r. 1 )1.%, ifirmep-:.I-* : -*' -~.~'# M>*4,"p ' 41/a *~ 3,Â»tu 2- 2_ . ' . -i *- - - -29 ' 14.=./.p./t' ADA . A i k wl'f 44* 144'2 5 " ,. , ' .P. 4 I ' I .&/ â‚¬' 4 J & -1--ll- - ,- - I. I 8 - A ail- I. k Ak. a - I :/7 -=- 411 =*,@.*2.Z=.--*. : .â€ž==Ct'...+ ... ..1-- -1. 272/..6./.3.~8.~~.4....9.443 ==-=ME=l E 5,0 & ..An =Ah Â· - ....... m ==I= 17* 14 $ ... --/YA $ I. & 7. b-WI- *r'* & V C Â·=... .4 - --3014: y *53r.-;VE,s/Er=,.. - - --- 3~S-- 93222 r SC~*;~12.-- 1 Â·Â·=25~-NÂ·'mi.q,i..,rÂ·Â·%:,L 'S = Â·Â£2*- 40*6 - -r--â€¢at_-- - - -401% ,70:># 1*-*E- . 2':-:Tu =411 . 4*2~. ~ 44:Â·, 6.7 97~~7-7-Il-I--I.31 1 ~ -2'1 ... : ~ - Â·ti It~q r Â» , -"Ir//8/4 DA A .. A i. %81% B rE rowland+broughton ==M - a~~D' 1830~lal,~~L-Â®G m./0-0 ~03aOLT)730 I I /'44.0/0 070.2...314/1 301308 M' T~ELLIS Via"'",OU,m GLAâ€žGUARD.4 C-' 6 G~A-GUARO~1 m..4~0.491 1.-:-i r.4 1, 1 7 ---7 .1..~-21.1223*.d#:2% 7 0 CONC 1 ROOF OF(;. A A T.0 CONC. ' *Â·I T twrn .: r,-1.I,-43 1 mmrn 1 1 k.Â·1 TOCONC, 4 774s#6&14* TI 37 2-El :~ : ~ tillÂ· :.. 2 ~~ Toe i #2 I Rm n I 9-i~ -=y#~--qmfi#84$05- --~[f] UW&8#Wal 12 Fi~Â¢3{31 t.?22% 1 /9.4- T Levin 2 PAT,O 'REA pic,O- 7-co.5.CO5* .,2 4- TOCONC 07.14.2015 DETAILED REVIEW r.CONC . E : -101 [1 1 -1-1 1-1 .r rlÂ¢ râ‚¬-- [fl['1 [lm-----12--- Lcia*JiT-#12{ aULL: APPLICATION 13 920-; 91 mm ma -44 -46 i U[-3 11_1111,217nT L./I m GARAGEENTAY 8- HORIZONTAL WOOD SIDING 1/ HORIZONTAL WOOD SIOING e VERTICAL WOOD SIOING STUCCO STONE VENEER METAL ROOFING WOOD SLATS ~851 ~ . 4-- ~ ..:i li'llillilil'/ Ilillillil~Ilililill /17. 3.9./ EF-4 - Iii â€žAll .,1,1 .1 8*+.~li SKY HOTEL 4/09#*1 94Â»%. '10--02@3*@11,11 mal#010... 7ODE. DURANTAVE, *;112.5~/ ~ ASPEN. CO 81611 PROJECTNO ....60 GHEETTIT. PROPOSED SKY 1 HOTEL MATERIALS * SCALE. As indicated PD4.3 2,EMIL,81(t //>-517--Ri--7,-Shh\. SETBACKS: hut - , 11 AS SHOWN ON rE 4 ~ :~'i~ 33 ... -- PREVIOUS DOCS AND rowland-+broughton )' ' 1 F &4 7T **u.it!*.-./ *4d-en 1''I Elli~ :0 CLARIFIED PER 2>4~ nopkâ€¢n.~w~ 18]Â¤-iÂ® * - 200 =22 - .h / 1 i' . - L . 1.1 1.11 .7Â¤ K...=]00 363-308.â„¢3 0 â€¢~â€¢n catltii -Nac,02 ORDINANCE 39 emeâ€¢â€¢34731 301. MI liL Al NTER# 1 ri- - -t -=.LN<St,~ACK Â·FÂ·Â·Â·Â· i i#.â€¢ L 17.-j C #*E j r.LI<P ARaN*YOD.â‚¬26!COOE = <B! /'C' BE,BACK Co...~.m NEVÂ· 1 UE EPS DZ. I 1, 2 1 DUMONT IlÂ».O/ O*TEAU CHATEAU i...To~i, 07.14.2015 DETAILED 1 -Â·t - --WEir-1- REVIEW 1 1. -r APPICATION ECI) 1 1 EXIS}Int# &11=. 1 /2 w 1--RETA....Al G-A8OVE ORM .NE. 1 1 I.Â·orsET/*c' 9 1.3,Â·.eoi.,e...IrER,LESS...30"1,1.ET'ACK-1 UIT /-1--r- -- --T,na,ENGF,-g 2 , rÂ»1 r'FAQF W.1 11 T i DA A- L 1 .. DI / GLIZRY VIE CONCOMINIUMS *6*676'm- ~ESS 1 2 Â· STORY, I._:1 #.5 U 'B.K I2 1 TIE L.nTI Â· NELLHOTEL & I ~â€¢Â·STORÂ¥, / il i PRIVATE SKY HOTEL . .P- 1 RESIDENCE <1 ~ ST,mup:o __ ._. pfi ... .2.STOAY, Â·f~ An, 1 1 1 1 1,0.0.1, \ \ 1\ 01 1\ 1 1 VID" 1 ke E. CU~ANT AVE. / \ 1% K ......PS PAR*1Â»3 ,5 ASPEN,/081811 4 \9 4,3 1 \411 0 L J 21,2#SELLJilptlfYjEL 7,/ i Ilpeaâ€¢.â€¢ Il/ ASPEN ALPS BUILDING / .. ,2.STOR' Viler i / PROJEC7 NO> 0 , 0 / SHEETTDTLE -11 PROPOSED SITE PLAN SCALE 1,16"=1'll PD1.1 BIKE RACK _ --=== RELOCATION -aÂ¥ . R.O.W. EXISTING P.A. = 3,760 SF 15.6% rE IMPROVEMENTS 8TREETLEVELAm PREVIOUS P.A. ORD 39 = 11,798 SF 49.2% .30. SUBTOTAL 2~4 Cit PATIO PRESENT P.A. = 11,367 SF (-435) 47.4% 1 /2 SF â€¢575. TOTAL 1.7. ./. Ay'l, rowland+broughton NETLWAREA 2400,0 231, *v, 18~OW~ka" # * â€¢â€¢pâ€¢,1 . 816I 1 d,-f, co '002 P.A. BREAKDOWN: 07054â€¢ j,731 m.,06 /70, 970.544~0060 301,06.,37,0 STREETLEVEL: 3117 then, 3430 now (+313) f=17 SECOND LEVEL: 1553 then, 1362 now (-191) ROOF LEVEL: 7132 then, 6575 now (-557) 1 - DD level document refinement, coordination w/ - C.------ Iligrig//L,22/,OTO#*a#*ar U /1 - structure & consultants, more sloped roof area, reduced flat roof 4 - reconfiguration/reduction @ level 2 patio - large improvements in ROW CHATEAU CHATEAU Ii - 'ONT CHAUMONT 41Â·ST<Â»lfâ€¢ O.STOR' 1.- 12 m==4 03 EN 07.142015 DETAILED REVIEW I, SE 54, A n - 4%Â«/1 , 1 - E F --- - >545331 5 i I I - -Â£35*11 1 ILLE Â¥5/5951 1 1 -- 94 3 11,1 , PLANTER |FA~ -ER i 010*WAIK M 11 11 1Â» /*111 =- 11=-1 , GLORY HOLE Â»*2>22: 1 m 1 221 CONDOMNIU).AS H UTTLE HEEE:,1- ~ FP 1 SKY HOTEL 13-STOll, 1â‚¬LL HOTEL 14./70.Â¥, 657SSF 11141 r =*iw~~ '1 W 1 | PRIVATE 709 E. DURANT AVE. aN,TER 10*22=.1 1 OVER ROC,F 12>m=L-1 1 1 RESIDENCE ASPEN. CO 8161 1 1-e,~,3300*~,74<HA PROPOGED PUBLIC -JE*5/ RWA81 AMENIâ„¢ SPIE 1 21,IDLEVELPAnc <;Pt$*tft//It}lfi /I A - ~382. ' 862â„¢;Cill 1 4> tch.1 1 1. PROJECTNO 2,â€¢ouo I I ASPEN ALPS V ~WEETTInE BULDING C..OR'. R.O.W. Â¤ AMENITY SPACE PLAN PROPOSED PUBLIC 1 IMPROVEMENTS Â° , L-J 1.----1 L-W SCALE 1/16'- 1'. PD1.3b , /// ----- .=2.-912 - SOUTH SPRING $'*ET 4, 13971 e- N 9] 4 29. P.*Aill/'57"IN".RM. 6- 44*-1 73+6-'*t, 2 1. . 04 412.-tr * A -- . : 1- / 4 9 . . . I A . - 1 ; Mi .-4 I. *T , .r â‚¬ 4 . 24 4.. . I , ...**Â¥,1, 1 4~: - 341, -*23,4, 1 02.2 .2,1 .~~t.k>â€¢Al 44 .1 ' 8' k . tj,4. 4.. , 1 i-~*@Â»â€¢j=U=- ~_ 1 Â·,- 3 4 1 : 6&2.2 f * am 33. I. I . I .04 . . 1 1 + i,>TA ..4 - *t j d --IC 3 *a,3Â£l-# t . =i- I .. - 3/4 *I '~ ? }k kl 1 .... 1. 1 11 tt a y- - AL d fâ‚¬ - C. 442 :* i 39 f - ----------J-~~ 4 ' .. -Uff 0 . 8 -A Sjoff PrY# 91-01 firl~we 0-8 fflate; IaL[ 8/)0) 70 1 Fs- 1100 4.4,r e VI.A. MEMORANDUM TO: Aspen Planning and Zoning Commission FROM: Jessica Garrow, Long Range Planner THRU: Jennifer Phelan, Community Development Deputy Director RE: 709 E Durant - Planned Development Detailed Review, Final Commercial Resign Review Resolution No. , Series of 2015 MEETING DATE: August 18,2015 APPLICANT /OWNER: *RN.Â·A. ta,%Â¥*1-â€¢-AÂ· % 910.-gâ€¢r v...=M , 2 Aspen Club Lodge Properties, LLC REPRESENTATIVE: Sunny Vann, Vann Associates, LLC f. f*gu/"1 1.1 ' 5 f' e 4.8.-' *43.2 L 4.. I i ;Â· i>.1 7, LOCATION: .. 0 Â·Â· .,1; "42 - 709 E Durant Ave , Â· -,i' : _-41 f 6 1.'. 4 9 .1,1 : + CURRENT ZONING: I Lodge (L) Zone District - . .,* SUMMARY: The Applicant requests reviews to redevelop the existing Sky Hotel to include lodge, Photo: Sky Hotel building. commercial, and affordable housing uses. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends approval with conditions REOUEST OF THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION: The Applicant is requesting the following land use approvals from the Planning and Zoning Commission: â€¢ Final Commercial Design Review (Chapter 26.412, and the Commercial Design Guidelines) for construction of a mixed-use lodge building. (The Planning and Zoning Commission is the final review authoritY. â€¢ A Planned Development Detailed Review (Chapter 26.445) to refine a project's design and operational characteristics. (The Planning and Zoning Commission is the final Sky Hotel Planned Development- Detail Review & Final Commercial Design Review P&Z Meeting 8/18/15 Page 1 0 f 6 P4 IV.A. Recular Meeting Planning & Zoning Commission August 4,2015 Ms. Tygre moved to approve Resolution 16, Series 2015 approving final commercial design review for the project located at 308 S Hunter St. The motion was seconded by Mr. Mesirow. Mr. Walterscheid asked for a roll call: Mr. McNellis, yes; Mr. Mesirow, yes; Mr. Elliot, yes; Mr. Goode, yes; Ms. McNicholas, yes; Ms. Tygre, yes; Mr. Walterscheid, yes. The motion passed with a seven to zero (7-0) vote. Mr. Walterscheid then closed the public hearing. Mr. Goode asked Mr. Bendon when the Aspen Area Community Plan (AACP) would be updated. Mr. Bendon stated the current version was updated in 2012 and there are no current plans to update it. Mr. Goode asked if there was a different opinion of the AACP than what currently exists. Mr. Bendon stated it was difficult to reach consensus on contested issues which continue within certain areas. Mr. Bendon stated there is a big effort to update the land use code to more closely reflect the AACP. Mr. Bendon also stated they continue to work with Council to identify sections of code to update. Mr. Walterscheid then adjourned the meeting. Cindy Klob City Clerk's Office, Records Manager 11 1" 3 P3 VI.A. review authoritv for Detailed Review. City Council granted Project Review approval which established dimensional requirements for the project.) PREVIOUS APPROVALS: Planned Development Proiect Review Approval: The Planning and Zoning Commission reviewed the Sky Hotel's Planned Development Project Review and associated reviews in September and October of 2014. The Commission recommended four-to-one that Council approve the project. City Council reviewed and approved the Sky Hotel Planned Development Project Review and associated reviews by a vote of four-to-zero on February 9, 2015 via Ordinance 39, Scries 2014. The Council's approved Ordinance established all the dimensional and use requirements for the project. The Ordinance allows minor changes to dimensions to be reviewed and approved by the Planning and Zoning Commission and Community Development Staff. The approved project consists of 104 lodge units.ag.*117 lodge bedroomst, 3,480 sq ft qf commercial net leasable space, 2_affordable hotin=g units, and a sub=grade-parking.garage_of 54_ spaces. 12.5 surface parking spaces are- located adjacent to the Aspen Alps 100 building and serve as parking for that building. NQ_dimensional_variations were part of the final approved project. Administrative Amendment: In July 2015, staff and the Applicant realized the dimensional table included in Ordinance 39, Series 2014 did not include updated setbacks. The Applicant had initially requested different setbacks, but rescinded their request afGliTitial feedback from City Council. The project drawings were updated, but the dimensional table in the Ordinance was not. An administrative approval to correct that error was approved on July 7,2015. BACKGROUND: The Sky Hotel is located in the Lodge zone district at the south-east corner of Spring Street and Durant Avenue at 709 E Durant. The existing lodge is in the shape of an "L," wrapping around the alley. The property has been used as lodging since the 1 960s when the Glory Hole Lodge and restaurant occupied a portion of the site. The property was remodeled in the late 1 970s and the property was renamed the Woodstone Inn. In 1981 the lodge received approval to condominiumize, though no condominium units were ever sold - the lodge has remained in various single ownership interests throughout its history. In 1984 the lodge was purchased by Richard Butera and renamed the Aspen Club Lodge. The current owners have owned the property, now known as the Sky Hotel, since 2001. The owners filed an application for redevelopment in 2005, which was ultimately withdrawn. The property is not a typical set of townsite lots and blocks, and includes portions of vacated streets and an alley. In the 1960s, there were a number of street and alley vacations in the area, with other lands being dedicated to the City for right-of-way. The existing Spring Street, for instance, was conveyed to the City in 1961, and the original Spring Street right-of-way, which is part of the Sky Hotel property, was vacated in 1962. A portion of Ute Avenue is located on the property and was also vacated in 1962. In addition, there is a 1963 15-foot access easement on the Sky Hotel property granted to the Aspen Alps Condominiums. PROJECT SUMMARY: ' This includes 11 fractional lodge units, 10 bunk-style lodge units, and 83 traditional lodge units Sky Hotel Planned Development - Detail Review & Final Commercial Design Review P&Z Meeting 8/18/15 Page 2 0 f 6 P5 VI.A. The Applicant is proposing to redevelop the Sky Hotel, adding twelve (14) new lodge units, for a total of 104 lodge units, two (2) affordable housing units, and replacing 3.380 square feet of ' commercial space to the site. The Applicant is requesting some minor changes to the ~ dimensional requirements. These are listed below and outlined in Table 1. below. Floor Area: There are minor changes to the proposed floor area for the property that result in a decrease in the floor area of the building. This is due to aportion of the first floor being logted below gradg_which has the effect of decreasing the overall floor area calculation. This condition existed during the PD-Project Review, but was not carried forward into the floor area calculations. In addition, some refinements were made to the plans which resulted in minor decreases to the lodge and non-unit floor area numbers. There is an overall floor area reduction of 5,148 sq ft. Floor area for the commercial use changes slightly as a result of ski storage lockers in the basement. These were included in the original proposal, but were erroneously excluded from the commercial calculation. It should be noted that there are no changes to the commercial net leasable, affordable housing net livable, lodge net livable, or_lodge unit count. Public Amenitv: There are minor changes to the public amenity space in the project. The original calculations were done off of the gross lot size, and should have been done using the net lot size. Net lot size excludes portions of the lot that are in vacated rights-of-way. Using the correct calculation methodology, the approved project included 11,798 sq ft of public amenity space on the ground, second, and roof levels of the site. This equates to 49.2% of the site being designated as public amenity.2 The Applicant has refined the landscaping and public amenity plans for the property, including increasing the size of the pool and refining planter box layouts. In addition, the Applicant found a second level setback that was not properly calculated during Project Review. The project refinements have resulted in a decrease to the public amenity space by 43.Lsq ft. The proposed public amenity space is 11,367 sq ft, or 47.4%.3 Staff supports the change in public amenity, as the areas will be permanently accessible by the public and the amount far exceeds the lodge zone district's requirement of 25%. 2 Net lot area for the parcel is 24.001 sq ft (42,645 sq ft gross - 18,644 sq ft of vacated rights-of-way). 11,798 sq ft/24,001 sq ft = 49.2% 3 11,367 sq ft/24,001 sqft =47.4% Sky Hotel Planned Development - Detail Review & Final Commercial Design Review P&Z Meeting 8/18/15 Page 3 of 6 P6 VI.A. Table 1: Dimensional Data Approved Dimensional Requirements Amended Dimensions 104 units and 117 bedrooms in Lodge Units and Net Livable No Change 56,509 sq ft net livable Commercial Net Leasable 3,480 sq ft net leasable No Change Affordable Housing Units and Net Livable 2 units in 1,714 sq ft net livable No Change Minimum Gross Lot Size (sq ft) 42,645 sq ft No Change Minimum Net Lot Size (sq ft) (includes vacated right- 37,113 sq ft of-way) Minimum Lot Width (feet) 116 ft No Change Above Grade - 10 ft Minimum Front Yard Setback (feet) No Change Below Grade - 5 ft Above Grade, East Wing - 6.4 ft Minimum East Side Yard Setback (feet) Above Grade, West Wing - 5 ft No Change Below Grade -,fulk Â«Reet Above Grade - 5 ft Minimum West Side Yard Setback (feet) No Change Below Grade - 5 ft Above Grade - 5 ft Minimum Rear Yard Setback (feet) No Change Below Grade - 5 ft Maximum Height (feet) 40 feet No Change Maximum Height for mechanical 50 feet No Change 11,367 sq ft (47.4%) Public Amenity Space 11,798 sq ft (49.2%) (A reduction of 431 sq ft and 1.8%) Allowed Floor Area 86,403 sq ft (2.33:1) Overall 91,552 sq ft (2.46:1)* (Reduction of 5,148 sq ft) 68,824 sq ft (1.85:1) Lodge 72,781 sq ft (1.96:1) (Reduction of 3,957 sq ft) 3,377 sq ft (.09:1) Commercial 3,460 sq ft (.09:1) (Reduction of 83 sq ft) 1,463 sq ft (.04:1) Affordable Housing 1,876 sq ft (.05:1) (Reduction of 413 sq ft) 12,739 sq ft (.34:1) Non-Unit Space 13,435 sq ft (.36:1) (Reduction of 696) Parking Garage: 54 Spaces Minimum Off-Street Parking Surface Spaces: 12.5 spaces for Aspen No Change Alps Minimum Trash/Recycle Area 560 sq ft No Change STAFF COMMENTS: PLANNED DEVELOPMENT - DETAILED REVIEW: A Planned Development Review is required for the eleven (11) approved fractional lodge units. While Project Review focuses on the general Sky Hotel Planned Development - Detail Review & Final Commercial Design Review P&Z Meeting 8/18/15 Page 4 of 6 P7 VI.A. concept for the development and outlines underlying dimensional requirements, Detailed Review focuses on the comprehensive evaluation of the specific aspects of the development, including utility placement, and architectural materials. The project includes detailed landscaping, including approximately fifty-four (54) new street trees and 5,000 sq ft of perennial/shrub plantings. The Applicant is coordinating all plantings with the City Parks Department to ensure the new street-trees are located in such a way as to allow mature growth. In addition, the Applicant is working with the Parks and Engineering Departments to coordinate the use of silva cells. All exterior lighting and signage will meet City of Aspen requirements, and will be confirmed at Building Permit review. The building is located partially within the Yellow and Blue Mudflow zones. The applicant has addressed this through engineered site walls that will be reinforced to withstand both dynamic and static mud pressure, as well as through impact resistant glass. The project is required to provide pedestrian, bike, and transit facilities. The project has completed the required Transportation Impact Analysis (TIA), and is providing mitigation for approximately 25 new vehicle trips, when mitigation for just 5.3 is required. The project includes detached sidewalks, as well as additional landscaping, and improved crosswalks. Bike racksarepropged at the spring street Cut-de-sac, as well as at the corner of Spring and Dufant. A pedestrian path that was located between the Sky Hotel and the Glory Hole Condominiums has been removed. Finally, the project will include ''end of trip facilitieâ‚¬' including lockers and showers for staff members who bike to work. COMMERCIAL DESIGN: The property is located within the Commercial Character Area. The Applicant has proposed a design inspired by chalet architecture in Aspen and other mountain communities. The chalet design is particularly evident along Spring and Durant Streets with the sweeping roof forms. There are a number of other gable roof forms and flat roof forms along the alley elevation. The massing is the same as was approved in the ConciptuaL-RaiÂ©w. Minor chances, including adding an entry airlock, moving the main entry exterior ramp to the interior of the building, adding additional green roof/planters, adding additional storefront windows, and amending gable dormers to shed dot-mers. Staff supports all of the changes, as they are minor in nature and meet the applicable review criteria. The minor roof form changes do not impact the overall mass of the building, and act to create a more cohesive design. Staff supports the ramp relocation, as it ensures the sidewalks along Spring Street meet city requirements. In addition, staff supports the refined landscape plan, as it creates additional amenities for passersby such as benches, as well as additional green space on and around the building. The proposed materials include stone veneer cladding, wood siding, and stucco finishes. Roofing materials will consist of standing seam and corrugated metal. Stiff supports the proposed materials, with the exception of the stucco. Staff recommends that the wood s~ng replacethe_slucco. The stucco is located on the highest portions of the building, above the various forms of wood siding. $taff recommends that the wood siding be continued up to the Sky Hotel Planned Development- Detail Review & Final Commercial Design Review P&Z Meeting 8/18/15 Page 5 0 f 6 P8 VI.A. agfling.. The applicant has created a mock-up of the building, including materials that P&Z can visit prior to the meeting. The applicant will also bring sample materials to the meeting. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends the Commission approved the Sky Hotel Planned Development Detailed Review and Final Commercial Design Review, with conditions. PROPOSED MOTION: 1 move to approve a Planned Development Detailed Review and Final Commercial Design Review for the Sky Hotel, 709 E Durant, with conditions." Attachments: Exhibit A.1 - PD Review Criteria, Staff Findings Exhibit A.2 - Commercial Design Review Criteria, Staff Findings Exhibit B - Application Exhibit C - Supplemental Information from Applicant, received 8.12.15 Exhibit D - Ordinance 39, Series 2015 Exhibit E - DRC Comments Exhibit F - Public Comments Sky Hotel Planned Development - Detail Review & Final Commercial Design Review P&Z Meeting 8/18/15 Page 6 0 f 6 P9 VI.A. RESOLUTION NO. (SERIES OF 2015) A RESOLUTION OF THE ASPEN PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION GRANTING FINAL COMMERCIAL DESIGN REVIEW APPROVAL, AND PLANNED DEVELOPMENT - DETAILED REVIEW APPROVAL, FOR A SITE SPECIFIC DEVELOPMENT PLAN FOR THE SKY HOTEL SUBDIVISION/PLANNED DEVELOPMENT LOCATED ON PROPERTY COMMONLY KNOWN AS 709 E DURANT AVENUE, CITY OF ASPEN, PITKIN COUNTY, COLORADO. Parcel ID: 2737-182-80-001 WHEREAS, the Community Development Department received an application for the Sky Hotel Subdivision/P[)(the Application) from Aspen Club Lodge Properties, LLC (Applicant), represented by Sunny Vann of Vann Associates for the following land use review approvals: â€¢ Planned Development - Project Review, pursuant to Land Use Code Chapter 26.445. â€¢ Timeshare Review, pursuant to Land Use Code Chapter 26.590. â€¢ Subdivision Review, pursuant to Land Use Code Chapter 26.480. â€¢ Growth Management Review - Replacement of Existing Commercial and Lodge Development, pursuant to Land Use Code Chapter 26.470. â€¢ Growth Management Review -Lodge Development, pursuant to Land Use Code Chapter 26.470. â€¢ Growth Management Review - New Free Market Residential Units, pursuant to Land Use Code Chapter 26.470. â€¢ Growth Management Review - Affordable Housing, pursuant to Land Use Code Chapter 26.470. â€¢ Special Review to establish Parking, pursuant to Land Use Code Chapter 26.430. â€¢ Conditional Use for commercial space, pursuant to Land Use Code Chapter 26.425. â€¢ Commercial Design Review, pursuant to Land Use Code Section 26.412; and, WHEREAS, all code citation references are to the City of Aspen Land Use Code in effect on the day of initial application - June 23,2014, as applicable to this Project; and, WHEREAS, the Application for the Sky Hotel Subdivision/PD initially proposed: â€¢ 102 hotel units with 102 keys and 103 bedrooms in 44,634 square feet of net livable area. â€¢ 3,380 square feet of accessory commercial net leasable space. â€¢ 8 free-market residential units (plus 4 lock-offs) in 14,622 square feet of net livable area. â€¢ 5 affordable housing units in 4,301 square feet of net livable area. â€¢ 83 parking spaces (70 of which are in an underground facility, and 13 of which are at-grade spaces dedicated to the Aspen Alps.); and, Sky Hotel Planned Development & Commercial Design Planning and Zoning Commission Reso No. _, Series 2015 Page 1 of 8 P10 VI.A. WHEREAS, the Community Development Department received referral comments from the Aspen Consolidated Sanitation District. City Engineering, Building Department, Fire Protection District, Environmental Health Department, Parks Department, Parking Department. Aspen/Pitkin County Housing Authority, Public Works Department, and the Transportation Department as a result of the Development Review Committee meeting; and, WHEREAS, pursuant to Section 26.470.040.C.7, Affordable Housing, of the Land Use Code, a recommendation from tlie Aspen/Pitkin County Housing Authority is required and a recommendation for approval by the board was provided at their July 16,2014, regular meeting; and, WHEREAS, said referral agencies and the Aspen Community Development Department reviewed the proposed Application and recommended approval with conditions; and, WHEREAS, the Planning and Zoning Commission reviewed the Application at a duly noticed public hearing on September 16, 2014, and continued to October 7, 2014 and October 21, 2014, during which the recommendations of the Community Development Director and comments from the public were requested and heard by the Planning and Zoning Commission ; and, WHEREAS, in response to feedback from the public, Community Development staff, and the Planning and Zoning Commission on October 7, 2014, the Applicant revised the proposal to include: ' 106 hotel units with 106 keys and 107 bedrooms in 47,092 square feet of net livable area. . 3,380 square feet of accessory commercial net leasable space. â€¢ 6 free-market residential units (plus 2 lock-offs) in 10,322 square feet of net livable area. = 5 affordable housing units in 4,301 square feet of net livable area. ~ 83 parking spaces (70 of which are in an underground facility, and 13 of which are at-grade spaces dedicated to the Aspen Alps.); and, WHEREAS, during a duly noticed public hearing on October 21,2014, the Planning and Zoning Commission approved Resolution 15, Series of 2014, by a four to one (4-1) vote recommending City Council approve the Sky Hotel Subdivision/PD Application and all necessary land use reviews, with conditions; and, WHEREAS, the City Council reviewed the Application at a duly noticed public hearing on December 1, 2014, and continued to December 8, 2014, January 12, 2015, and February 9, 2015, during which the recommendations of the Community Development Director and comments from the public were requested and heard by the City Council; and, WHEREAS, in response to feedback from the public and City Council on December L 2014. the Applicant revised the proposal to include: â€¢ 104 hotel units, 104 keys and 117 bedrooms in 56,509 square feet of net livable area. Sky Hotel Planned Development & Commercial Design Planning and Zoning Commission Reso No. _, Series 2015 Page 2 of 8 Pll VI.A. â€¢ 3,480 square feet of commercial net leasable space. â€¢ 2 affordable housing units in 1,714square feet of net livable area. â€¢ 66.5 parking spaces (54 of which are in an underground facility, and 12.5 of which are at-grade spaces dedicated to the Aspen Alps.); and, WHEREAS, during a public hearing on February 9, 2015, the Aspen City Council approved Ordinance No. 39, Series 2014. by a four to zero (4-0) vote, approving with conditions the Sky Hotel Subdivision and all necessary land use reviews; and, WHEREAS, the Community Development Department approved an Administrative Planned Development - Project Review Amendrnent (Reception No 621405) to correct certain setback requirements contained in Exhibit A to Ordinance 39 Series of 2014; and WHEREAS. all required public noticing was provided as evidenced by an affidavit of public notice submitted to the record, a public open house was provided by the applicant to meet the requirements of Land Use Code Section 26.304.035, and the public was provided a thorough and full review of the proposed development; and, WHEREAS, during a duly noticed public hearing on ~ ~ ~~ , 2015, the Planning and Zoning Commission approved Resolution Ft Series of 2015, by a 67* to O 03 vote granting Final Commercial Design approval, and Planned Development - Detailed Review approval. with the recommended conditions of approval listed hereinafter. NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVEDBY THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF ASPEN, COLORADO THAT: Section 1: Approval Pursuant to the procedures and standards set forth in Title 26 of the Aspen Municipal Code, the Planning and Commission hereby grants the Sky Hotel Planned Development - Detailed Review approval and Final Commercial Design Review, subject to the conditions of approval as listed herein and as described in City Council Ordinance No. 39, Series of 2014. Section 2: Dimensions Dimensions were approved in Ordinance 39, Series 2015, and amended herein. The final approved dimensions are attached hereto as Exhibit A. As stated in Section 1 of Ordinance 39, Series 2015, minor variations may be approved subject to review by the Community Development Department. Section 3: Public Amenitv Spaces A total of 11,367 sq ft of public amenity space shall be on the property. This is through a combination of at-grade, second floor deck, and rooftop deck spaces. These spaces shall meet all requirements of Ordinance 39, Series 2015. Section 4: Materials The stucco is not approved and shall be replaced with the wood siding located below it on the proposed plans. , thotom/3 oppfovit co Impyy Sky Hotel Planned Development & Commercial Design Planning and Zoning Commission 0*RED) t 87 Reso No. _, Series 2015 Page 3 of 8 P12 VI.A. Section 5: Subdivision/PD Plat and Agreement The Applicant shall submit a Subdivision/PD agreement (hereinafter "Agreement") that meets the requirements of the Land Use Code within 180 days of final approval. The ] 80 days shall commence upon the granting of Final Commercial Design and Planned Development - Detail Review approvals by the Planning & Zoning Commission. The recordation documents shall be submitted in accordance with the requirements of Section 26.490 Approval Documents of the Land Use Code. a. In accordance in Section 26.490.040, Approval Documents Content and Form. the following plans are required in the Approved Plan Set: 1. Final Commercial Design Review/ Architectural Character Plan. 2. Planned Development Detail Review Plans. 3. Public Amenity Plans. 4. Public Infrastructure Plan. 5. Final Transportation Impact Analysis (TIA). 6. Subdivision Plat. The subdivision plat shall show a non-exclusive easement for ingress and egress across the easterly portion of the Applicant's property between Durant Avenue and the alley in Block 107, for the use of Chateau Chauniont and Chateau DuMont condominiums, as well as show the parking area currently used by the Aspen Alps 100 Building located along the southerly portion of the Applicant's property. b. In accordance with Section 26.490.050, Development Agreements, a Development Agreement shall be entered into with the City. c. In accordance with Section 26.490.060, Financial and Site Protection Requirements,the applicant shall provide a site protection guarantee and a site enhancement guarantee. d. In accordance with Section 26.490.070, Performance Guarantees, the following guarantees are required in an amount equal to 150% of the current estimated cost of the improvement: 1. Landscape Guarantee. 2. Public Facilities and Public Infrastructure Guarantee. 3. Storm Water and Drainage Improvements Guarantee. The timeshare docs and condo map referenced e. and f.. below, shall not be prepared until substantial completion of construction and should not be included in the 180 day deadline. They will be required prior to CO. e. In accordance with Section 26.590, Timeshare, the Applicant shall incorporate the requirements and restrictions of the City's Timeshare Regulations into the final timeshare instruments, including: 1. State requirements, 2. Owner occupancy limitations and disclosure of the public rental requirement, 3. Provisions for reserve funds for ongoing maintenance, 4. Prohibited practices and uses, Sky Hotel Planned Development & Commercial Design Planning and Zoning Commission Reso No. _, Series 2015 Page 4 of 8 P13 VI.A. 5. Limits on marketing techniques, 6. A prohibition against long-term storage of owner vehicles, and 7. Prohibitions on offering non-Aspen gifts within a marketing plan. f. A Condominium Map shall be competed for the development in accordance with Section 26.480.050(A), Condominiumization. The Condominium Map shall depict the non-exclusive easement described in Section 8.a.6. Section 6: Engineering Department The Applicant's design shall be compliant with all sections of the City of Aspen Municipal Code, Title 21 and all construction and excavation standards published by the Engineering Depaitment. 6.1. Sidewalks. All sidewalks shall meet minimum sidewalk width per Engineering requirements and shall be detached. The sidewalk along Durant as it ties into the east property shall be approved by the Engineering Department. The drop off area shall have an ADA accessible route which complies with ICC/ANSI Section 503. 6.2 Streets and Sight Triangles. South Spring Street must maintain minimum road width with the proposed hotel drop off area and median. A sight triangle analysis for the driveway access point demonstrating adequate visibility for vehicles is required at building permit. 6.3 Snow Storage. Snow is not permitted to shed off roofs onto neighboring properties. Any snow which sheds off roofs must remain onsite. 6.4 Excavation Stabilization. This section shall supersede Section 9.3 of Ordinance 39, Series 2015. Due to the proxiinity of the neighboring property and the excavation of the building, an excavation stabilization plan shall be submitted to the Engineering Department at building permit submittal. 0 6 am-p Section 7: Building Project shall meet adopted Building Code in place at the tillie of building permit submittal. The project shall be subject to the 2015 IECC Energy Code. Pursuant to Land Use Code Section 26.575.020(F)(3)(c), height is measured to the first layer of exterior sheathing or weatherproofing membrane. Any additional insulation and associated material finishes requirements imposed by the 2015 IECC Energy Code shall constitute "other veneer treatments" for the purposes of calculating height pursuant to Land Use Code Section 26.575.020(F)(3)(c). Section 8: Transportation The TIA report submitted with the application and dated July 9,2015 is adopted. Section 9: Parks The project shall comply with Title 13 of the Municipal Code. Planting of trees is not allowed in Bio-Retention ponds, nor can the location of these ponds affect the long term health of any trees that are proposed. Tree species must be identified in the building permit and approved by the City Forester. The location of tree plantings shall be approved by the City Forester during the Sky Hotel Planned Development & Commercial Design Planning and Zoning Commission Reso No. _, Series 2015 Page 5 of 8 P14 VI.A. building permit review. Larger planting stripes or Silva cells along the northwest corner of the property and the pull out area on Spring Street are required. Planting areas that will allow trees to grow to maturity are required. Utilities shall be located away from tree plantings to the greatest extent practical. All landscaping shall be approved by the Parks Department at building permit. Section 10: Aspen Consolidated Sanitation District Requirements Permanent improvements are prohibited in sewer easements or right of ways. Landscaping plans will require approval by ACSD where soft and hard landscaping may impact public ROW or easements to be dedicated to the district. The applicant has shown an 8" sanitary sewer service on their plans to serve this development. The applicant will be required to deposit funds with the District to install a manhole to accommodate the propose 8" sanitary sewer service. The applicant must provide locations and sizing of interceptors to the District prior to the District approving service to this development. Glycol heating and snow melt systems must be designed to prohibit and discharge of glycol to any portion of the public and private sanitary sewer system. The glycol storage areas must have approved containment facilities. Section 11: Outdoor Lighting and Signage All outdoor lighting and all signage shall meet the requirements of the Aspen Municipal Code. This shall be verified at building permit review. Section 12: Vested Rights The development approvals granted herein shall constitute a site-specific development plan vested for a period of three (3) years from the date of issuance of a development order. However, any failure to abide by any of the terms and conditions attendant to this approval shall result in the forfeiture of said vested property rights. Unless otherwise exempted or extended, failure to properly record all plats and agreements required to be recorded, as specified herein, within 180 days of the effective date of the development order shall also result in the forfeiture of said vested property rights and shall render the development order void within the meaning of Section 26.104.050 (Void permits). Zoning that is not part of the approved site-specific development plan shall not result in the creation o f a vested property right. No later than fourteen ( 14) days following final approval of all requisite reviews necessary to obtain a development order as set forth in this Ordinance, the City Clerk shall cause to be published in a newspaper of general circulation within the jurisdictional boundaries of the City of Aspen. a notice advising the general public of the approval of a site specific development plan and creation of a vested property right pursuant to this Title. Such notice shall be substantially in the following form: Notice is hereby given to the general public of the approval of a site specific development plan, and the creation of a vested property right, valid for a period of three (3) years, pursuant to the Land Use Sky Hotel Planned Development & Commercial Design Planning and Zoning Commission Reso No. _, Series 2015 Page 6 of 8 P15 VI.A. Code of the City of Aspen and Title 24, Article 68. Colorado Revised Statutes, pertaining to the following described property: 709 E Durant, Sky Hotel Subdivision/PD, City ofAspen, Colorado. Nothing in this approval shall exempt the development order from subsequent reviews and approvals required by this approval or the general rules, regulations and ordinances of the City of Aspen provided that such reviews and approvals are not inconsistent with this approval. The approval granted hereby shall be subject to all rights of referendum and judicial review; the period of time permitted by law for the exercise of such rights shall not begin to run until the date of publication of the notice of final development approval as required under Section 26.304.070(A). The rights of referendum shall be limited as set forth in the Colorado Constitution and the Aspen Home Rule Charter. Section 13: All material representations and commitments made by the Applicant pursuant to the development proposal approvals as herein awarded, whether in public hearing or documentation presented before the Community Development Department, the Planning and Zoning Commission, or the Aspen City Council are hereby incorporated in such plan development approvals and the same shall be complied with as if fully set forth herein, unless amended by other specific conditions or an authorized authority. Section 14: This Resolution shall not affect any existing litigation and shall not operate as an abatement of any action or proceeding now pending under or by virtue ofthe ordinances repealed or amended as herein provided, and the same shall be conducted and concluded under such prior ordinances. Section 15: If any section, subsection, sentence, clause, phrase, or portion of this Resolution is for any reason held invalid or unconstitutional in a court of competent jurisdiction, such portion shall be deemed a separate, distinct and independent provision and shall not affect the validity of the remaining portions thereof. FINALLY, adopted, passed and approved this day of ,2015. Approved as to form: Approved as to content: James R True, City Attorney Ryan Walterschied, Chair Attest: Cindy Klob, Records Manager Attachments: Sky Hotel Planned Development & Commercial Design Planning and Zoning Commission Reso No. _, Series 2015 Page 7 of 8 P16 VI.A. Exhibit A: Approved Dimensional Requirements Exhibit A: Approved Dimensional Requirements 104 units and 117 bedrooms in Lodge Units and Net Livable 56,509 sq ft net livable Commercial Net Leasable 3,480 sq ft net leasable Affordable Housing Units and Net Livable 2 units in 1,714 sq ft net livable Minimum Gross Lot Size (sq ft) 42,645 sq ft Minimum Net Lot Size (sq ft) (includes vacated right- 37,113 sq ft of-way) Minimum Lot Width (feet) 116 ft Above Grade - 10 ft Minimum Front Yard Setback (feet) Below Grade - 5 ft Above Grade, East Wing - 6.4 ft Minimum East Side Yard Setback (feet) Above Grade, West Wing - 5 ft Below Grade - 5 ft Above Grade - 5 ft Minimum West Side Yard Setback (feet) Below Grade - 5 ft Above Grade - 5 ft Minimum Rear Yard Setback (feet) Below Grade - 5 ft Maximum Height (feet) 40 feet Maximum Height for mechanical 50 feet Public Amenity Space 11,367 sq ft Allowed Floor Area Overall 86,403 sq ft (2.33:1)* Lodge 68,824 sq ft (1.85:1) Commercial 3,377 sq ft (.09:1) Affordable Housing 1,463 sq ft (.04:1) Non-Unit Space 12,739 sq ft (.34:1) Parking Garage: 54 Spaces Minimum Off-Street Parking Surface Spaces: 12.5 spaces for Aspen Alps Minimum Trash/Recycle Area 560 sq ft *Minor changes during building permit review may be approved such that they do not exceed those in the underlying zone district Sky Hotel Planned Development & Commercial Design Planning and Zoning Commission Reso No. _, Series 2015 Page 8 of 8 P17 VI.A. Exhibit A.1 - Planned Development Detailed Review Criteria 26.445.030.C Scope and Limitations of Detailed Review. Detailed Review shall be used to perfect and finalize detail aspects of the project within the parameters established during Project Review. Issues resolved during Project Review shall not be revisited or reconsidered as part of Detailed Review. (Also see amendment procedures - Section 26.445.110.) The approval of a Project Review and Detailed Review together constitute a Final Planned Development Approval. A Development Order shall be issued after Detailed Review approval and the period of statutory vested rights shall begin, subject to requirements of the Development Order regarding the submission and recording of certain documents, plats, plans, or agreements. 26.445.070. Detailed Review Standards. Detailed Review shall focus on the comprehensive evaluation of the specific aspects of the development, including utility placement, and architectural materials. Iii the review of a development application for Detailed Review, the Planning and Zoning Commission, or the Historic Preservation Commission as applicable, shall consider the following: A. Compliance with Project Review Approval. The proposed development, including all dimensions and uses, is consistent with the Project Review approval and adequately addresses conditions on the approval and direction received during the Project Review. Staff Response: Minor dimensional variations are proposed, as is permitted in the Project Review Approval (Ordinance 39, Series 2015). The dimensional changes are outlined in the table below. The changes are minor refinements that refect the further retinement of the project. The floor area calculations have decrease because some portions of the first level are located below grade. Minor changes to the public amenity space have occurred as the landscaping plan was further refined and an error in the initial Project Review calculation was discovered. Staff supports all the revised dimensions. Approved Dimensions Amended Dimensions 104 units and 117 bedrooms in Lodge Units and Net Livable No Change 56,509 sq ft net livable Commercial Net Leasable 3,480 sq ft net leasable No Change Affordable Housing Units and Net 2 units in 1,714 sq ft net livable Livable Minimum Gross Lot Size (sq ft) 42,645 sq ft No Change Minimum Net Lot Size (sq ft) (includes 37,113 sq ft vacated right-of-way) Minimum Lot Width (feet) 116 ft No Change Above Grade - 10 ft Minimum Front Yard Setback (feet) No Change Below Grade - 5 ft Sky Hotel PD - Detailed Review Exhibit A.1, PD Review Criteria Page 1 of 7 P18 VI.A. Above Grade, East Wing - 6.4 ft No Change Minimum East Side Yard Setback (feet) Above Grade, West Wing - 5 ft Below Grade - 5 ft Above Grade - 5 ft Minimum West Side Yard Setback (feet) No Change Below Grade - 5 ft Above Grade - 5 ft Minimum Rear Yard Setback (feet) No Change Below Grade - 5 ft Maximum Height (feet) 40 feet No Change Maximum Height for mechanical 50 feet No Change 11,367 sq ft (47.4%) Public Amenity Space 11,798 sq ft (49.2%) (A reduction of 431 sq ft and 1.8%) Allowed Floor Area 86,403 sq ft (2.33:1) Overall 91,552 sq ft (2.46:1) (Reduction of 5,148 sq ft) 68,824 sq ft (1.85:1) Lodge 72,781 sq ft (1.96:1) (Reduction of 3,957 sq ft) 3,377 sq ft (.09:1) Commercial 3,460 sq ft (.09:1) (Reduction of 83 sq ft) 1,463 sq ft (.04:1) Affordable Housing 1,876 sq ft (.05:1) (Reduction of 413 sq ft) 12,739 sq ft (.34:1) Non-Unit Space 13,435 sq ft (.36:1) (Reduction of 696) Parking Garage: 54 Spaces Minimum Off-Street Parking Surface Spaces: 12.5 spaces for No Change Aspen Alps Minimum Trash/Recycle Area 560 sq ft No Change The conditions of approval have been met as follows: 4 An Outdoor Lighting Plan, pursuant to section 26.575.150. Submitted and reviewed by Zoning Officer 4 An existing and proposed Landscaping Plan, identifying trees with diameters and values. Submitted and reviewed by Parks Department 4 A draft Construction Management Plan. Submitted and reviewed by Engineering Department 4 A snow storage and snow shedding plan. Snow is not permitted to shed off roofs onto neighboring properties. Demonstrate that any snow which sheds off roofs will remain on-site. Submitted and reviewed by Engineering and Building. 4 A completed Transportation Impact Analysis. Submitted and reviewed by Engineering and Transportation. 4 A final design plan for the Spring Street cul-de-sac and bump out. Submitted and reviewed by Engineering Department Sky Hotel PD - Detailed Review Exhibit A. 1, PD Review Criteria Page 2 of 7 P19 VI.A. B. Growth Management. The proposed development has received all required GMQS allotments, or is concurrently seeking allotments. Staff Response: The proposed project has received Growth Management allotments pursuant to Ordinance 39, Series 2015. C. Site Planning and Landscape Architecture. The site plan is compatible with the context and visual character of the area. In meeting this standard, the following criteria shall be used: 1. The landscape plan exhibits a well-designed treatment of exterior spaces, preserves existing significant vegetation, and provides an ample quantity and variety of ornamental plant species suitable for the Aspen area climate. Vegetation removal, protection, and restoration plans shall be acceptable to the Director of Parks and Open Space. Staff Response. All vegetation will be coordinated and approved by the Parks Department. The current landscape plan includes fifty-four streetscape trees and approximately 5,000 sq ft of perennial/shrub plantings. Additional plantings will be installed on the second floor and roof decks. The Applicant is coordinating all plantings with the City Parks Department to ensure the new street-trees are located in such a way as to allow mature growth. In addition, the Applicant is working with the Parks and Engineering Departments to coordinate the use of silva cells. The Parks Department provided a number of comments, which have been incorporated into the Resolution. 1. Tree species to be called out and approved by the City Forester. 2. Location of tree plantings to be approved in the jield by the City Forestry. (Must not be too close to building) 3. Larger planting strips on both the northwest corner ofproperty and pull out area on Spring Street or Silva cells would be required. 4. Plan on areas that can grow trees well into maturity. 5. Location of utilities to be awayfrom tree planting areas. Stafffinds this criterion is met. 2. Buildings and site grading provide simple, at-grade entrances and minimize extensive grade changes along building exteriors. The project meets or exceeds the requirements of the Americans with Disabilities Act and applicable requirements for emergency, maintenance, and service vehicle access. Adequate snow storage is accommodated. Staff Response: The project includes at-grade entrances, with the exception of the entrances along the alley. The Alley entrances are accessed by an ADA compliant ramp. Due to the natural grade changes along Spring Street, the main entry ramp that had been exterior has been moved to inside the building. This ensure adequate sidewalk widths along Spring Street. Snow storage areas are included on the site. Stajffinds this criterion is met. Sky Hotel PD - Detailed Review Exhibit A. 1, PD Review Criteria Page 3 of 7 P20 VI.A. 3. Energy efficiency or production features are integrated into the landscape in a manner that enhances the site. Staff Response: There are no energy production features proposed. Staff finds this criterion is not applicable. 4. All site lighting is proposed so as to prevent direct glare or hazardous interference of any kind to adjoining streets or lands. All exterior lighting shall comply with the City's outdoor lighting standards. Staff Response: The proposed lighting plan proposes a variety of lighting fixtures in many locations around the property. All outdoor lighting is required to meet the City's Outdoor Lighting Code. Verification will occur at building permit review. Staff jinds that this criterion is met. 5. Site drainage is accommodated for the proposed development in compliance with Title 29 - Engineering Design Standards and shall not negatively impact surrounding properties. Staff Response: Site drainage is in compliance with Title 29. The applicant has amended the drainage plans to comply with the City's requirements. Conformation of compliance -will be required at building permit. Sta#finds this criterion is met. D. Design Standards and Architecture. The proposed architectural details emphasize quality construction and design characteristics. In meeting this standard, the following criteria shall be used: 1. The project architecture provides for visual interest and incorporates present-day details and use of materials respectful of the community's past without attempting to mimic history. Staff Response: The proposed architecture, materials and details is appropriate for the Commercial Character area and fits in with the pattern of development in the neighborhood. The architecture is a product Of its own time with references to traditional developments through the chalet-inspired architecture. The design incorporates one, two, three, and four story elements, a variety of roof forms, as well as multiple balconies and decks. Staff finds this criterion is met. 2. Exterior materials are of a high quality, durability, and comply with applicable design standards, including those outlined in Chapter 26.410, Residential Design Standards. Chapter 26.412, Commercial Design Standards, and Chapter 26.415, Historic Preservation. Staff Response: The applicant proposes a combination of wood siding, natural patina metal panels, stone veneer, and stucco finishes. The roojing materials will consist of standing seam and corrugated metal. Stafffinds this criterion is met. 3. Building elitrances are sited or designed to minimize icing and snow shedding effects. Sky Hotel PD - Detailed Review Exhibit A. 1, PD Review Criteria Page 4 of 7 P21 VI.A. Staff Response: Building entrances have roof elements protecting the entrance from snow shedding. Stafffinds this criterion is met. 4. Energy efficiency or production features are integrated into structures in a manner that enhances the architecture. Staff Response: Energy efficiency features, such as solar panels, are not proposed as part of this project. Stafffinds this criterion is not applicable. 5. All structure lighting is proposed so as to prevent direct glare or hazardous interference of any kind to adjoining streets or lands. All exterior lighting shall comply with the City's outdoor lighting standards. Staff Response: All lighting will met the City of Aspen's Outdoor Lighting standards. The applicant submitted a preliminary plan for review. The Zoning Oficer will confirm compliance during the building permit review. Stafffinds this criterion is met. E. Common Parks, Open Space, Recreation Areas, or Facilities. If the proposed development includes common parks, open space, recreation areas, or common facilities, a proportionate, undivided interest is deeded in perpetuity to each lot or dwelling unit owner within the Planned Development. An adequate assurance through a Development Agreement for the permanent care and maintenance of open spaces, recreation areas, and shared facilities together with a prohibition against future development is required. Stajf Response: No common parks, open spaces, or other facilities are proposed as part of this development. The applicant has committed to keeping the rooftop deck permanently accessible to the public. This has also been incorporated as a condition in Ordinance 39, Series 2015. Staffjinds this criterion is not applicable. F. Pedestrian, bicycle & transit facilities. The development improves pedestrian, bicycle, and transit facilities. These facilities and improvements shall be prioritized over vehicular facilities and improvements. Any new vehicular access points minimize impacts on existing pedestrian, bicycle and transit facilities. Any specific designs, mitigation techniques, and implementation timelines as required during Project Review comply with the applicable requirements of the Project Review and as otherwise required in the Land Use Code. These plans shall provide sufficient detail to determine if the design or mitigation concept complies with the intent of the requirements and to determine any required cost estimating for surety requirements, but do not need to be detailed construction documents. Staff Response: The project has completed the required Transportation Impact Analysis (TIA), and is providing mitigationfor approximately 25 new vehicle trips, when mitigation.for just 5.3 is required. The project includes a number of MMLOS improvements the provide enhanced pedestrian and bike facilities. The project includes detached sidewalks, as well as additional Sky Hotel PD - Detailed Review Exhibit A. 1, PD Review Criteria Page 5 of 7 P22 VI.A. landscaping, and improved crosswalks. Bike racks are proposed at the spring street Cul-de-sac, as well as at the corner of Spring and Durant. A pedestrian path that was located between the Sky Hotel and the Glory Hole Condominiums has been removed. Finally, the project will include "end of trip Jacilities Including lockers and showers for staff members who bike to work. Transit improvements are not proposed due to the building's proximity to Rubey Park. Sta#Jinds this criterion is met. G. Engineering Design Standards. There has been accurate identification of engineering design and mitigation techniques necessary for development of the proposed subdivision to comply with the applicable requirements of Municipal Code Title 29 - Engineering Design Standards and the City of Aspen Urban Runoff Management Plan (URMP). Any specific designs, mitigation techniques, and implementation timelines as required during Project Review comply with the applicable requirements of Municipal Code Title 29 - Engineering Design Standards and the City of Aspen Urban Runoff Management Plan (URMP). These plans shall provide sufficient detail to determine if the design or mitigation concept complies with the intent of the requirements, but do not need to be detailed construction documents. Staff Response: The applicant has been working with the Engineering Department to conceptually comply with Municipal Code Title 29 and the URMP requirements. Engineering is comfortable moving forward with the conceptual proposal with the understanding that construction level documents are required at building permit. The building is located partially within the Yellow and Blue Mudjlow zones. The applicant has addressed this through engineered site walls that will be reinforced to withstand both dynamic and static mud pressure, as well as through impact resistant glass. Stajffinds this criterion is met. H. Public Infrastructure and Facilities. The proposed Planned Development shall upgrade public infrastructure and facilities necessary to serve the project. Improvements shall be at the sole costs of the developer. Any specific designs, mitigation techniques, and implementation timelines as required during Project Review comply with the applicable requirements of Municipal Code Title 29 - Engineering Design Standards and the City of Aspen Urban Runoff Management Plan (URMP). These plans shall provide sufficient detail to determine if the design or mitigation concept complies with the intent of the requirements, but do not need to be detailed construction documents. Staff Response: The applicant commits to upgrading public infrastructure as described in Ordinance 39, Series of 2015. Stajffinds this criterion is met. I. Phasing of development plan. If phasing of the development plan is proposed, each phase shall be designed to function as a complete development and shall not be reliant on subsequent phases. Phasing shall insulate, to the extent practical. occupants of initial phases from the construction of later phases. All necessary or proportionate improvements to public Sky Hotel PD - Detailed Review Exhibit A. 1, PD Review Criteria Page 6 of 7 P23 VI.A. facilities, payment of impact fees and fees-in-lieu, construction of any facilities to be used jointly by residents of the Planned Development, construction of any required affordable housing, and any mitigation measures shall be completed concurrent or prior to the respective impacts associated with the phase. Sta# Response: The applicant represents that the project will not be phased. Staff finds this criterion is not applicable. Sky Hotel PD - Detailed Review Exhibit A. 1, PD Review Criteria ' Page 7 of 7 P24 VI.A. Exhibit A.2 - Commercial Design Guidelines - Final Design Review Guidelines for the Commercial Character Area Commercial Character Area Design Objectives: These are key design objectives for the Commercial Area. The City must find that any new work will help to meet them: 1. Strengthen the sense of relatedness with the Commercial Core Historic District. Staff Findings: While the overall Commercial Character Area is adjacent to the Commercial Core Historic District, this property is not located adjacent to the Historic District. The proposal includes elements that relate to other buildings and architectural styles located at the base of Aspen Mountain, including the Chalet-style architecture. The uses relate to the uses seen in both character areas. Stafffinds this criterion is met. 2. Maintain a retail orientation. Staff Findings: Neither the existing or proposed development include a strictly retail component. Commercial spaces exist in the current building and are proposed to be replaced in the proposed building. These include restaurant spaces, a commercial kitchen, and a ski shop. Stafffinds this criterion is niet. 3. Promote creative, contemporary design. Designs should seek creative new solutions that convey the community's continuing interest in exploring innovations. At the same time, the fundamental principles of traditional design must be respected. This means that each project should strike a balance in the design variables that are presented in the following pages. Staff Findings: The proposed redevelopment is inspired by chalet-style architecture seen in Aspen, including at Mountain Chalet and the old Guido's building, as well as in other mountain resorts. The applicant has proposed a modern interpretation of the chalet, utilizing new materials, and emphasizing the roof form along the street elevations. The proposal includes traditional window styles seen throughout the community. Staff finds this criterion is met. 4. Encourage a well-defined street wall. The intent is to more clearly establish a strongly defined street wall, but with some greater variety than in the Commercial Core Historic District since the historic building edge is not as defined. A stronger street fagade definition should be achieved while at the same time recognizing the value of public dining and landscaped space. Staf Finding: As proposed the development will have a well-defined street wall oriented towards Spring and Durant that is accented with a Public Amenity space. Stalffinds this criterion is met. 5. Reflect the variety in building heights seen traditionally. It is important that a range and variation in building height and scale in the Commercial Area be Sky Hotel PD - Detailed Review Exhibit A.2, Commercial Design Review Criteria Page 1 of 5 P25 VI.A. recognized in future developments. Larger buildings should be varied in height and reflect original lot widths. Staff Findings: The Applicant proposes afour story building with various recessed areas and deck components to break up the mass of the building. Various elements of the building are one, two, three, and four stories. Different modules are created through the material treatment and the varying roof forms. During the PD-Project Review, the Applicant provided additional variation through reduction of the massing along the eastern wing to a three-story element, and by lowering the building to meet theforty (40) foot Lodge zone district height limit (approved through this Commercial Design Review). The project has essentially the same "L" shapedfootprint as the existing building. Stqfffinds this criterion is met. 6. Accommodate outdoor public spaces while establishing a clear definition to the street edge. Providing space in association with individual buildings remains important, but should be balanced with much greater building street presence and corner definition. Staff Findings: The existing public amenity space accents the established street wall that exists and is maintained. Staff.finds this criterion is met. 7. Promote variety in the street level experience. Display cases, architectural details and landscaping are among the design elements that should be used. Staff Findings: The applicant proposes variety in the project's street level experience with landscaped public amenity space, and building materials. Stafffinds this criterion is met. Sky Hotel PD - Detailed Review Exhibit A.2, Commercial Design Review Criteria Page 2 of 5 P26 VI.A. Commercial Character Area Final Review Design Guidelines Building Design and Articulation Staff Finding: As noted in the guidelines, form and scale of a building is further articulated by the expression of traditional lot widths, faqade articulation and street level character. The parcel is "L" shaped and encompasses a large area. The parcel itself is unique and not reflective of traditional 30 foot lot widths. The building includes a mix of one, two, three, and four story elements, as well as material and roofform changes. These help to create visual interest as well as create building modules that meet the Design Guidelines. In addition, the design is indicative of traditional lodging seen in other building also located south of Durant Street, including the Little Nell, St. Regis, Mountain Chalet, and Grand Hyatt. Staff.finds the following Guidelines are met 1.29 A new building shall reflect the traditional lot width (30ft.) as expressed by two or more of the following: â€¢ Variation in height at internal lot lines â€¢ Variation in the plane of the front faGade â€¢ Street facade composition â€¢ Variation in architectural detailing and materials to emphasize the building module 1.30 The detailed design of the building fal:ade should rellect the traditional scale and rhythm of the block. This should be achieved using: â€¢ The fenestration grouping â€¢ The modeling ofthe faced â€¢ The design framework for the first floor storefront â€¢ Variation in architectural detail/or the palette of faced materials 1.31 A building should reflect the architectural hierarchy and articulation inherent in the composition of the fa<a(le. â€¢ The design and definition of the traditionally tall first floor â€¢ The vertical proportions of the upper level fenestration pattern and ratio of solid wall to window area. 1.32 A building should reflect the three-dimensional characteristics of the street fafade in the strength and depth of modeling, fenestration and architectural detail. The building'sfirst floor contains a taller ceiling height than the other levels of the building, which is traditional of commercial and lodge buildings in Aspen. The upper level fenestration appropriately balances the solid to void ratio. The first floor has a ceiling height of l O feet 6 inches to 9 feet, while the upper floors have ceiling heights of 8 to 9 feet. The ceiling heights were reduced during the PD-Project Review in order to comply with the Lodge zone district's height limit of 40-feet. The building's third floor is consistent on all sides. The design approved by City Council includes a third floor that is flushwith the rest of the building, and includes varying roofforms. The varying roofforms, as well as the ceiling heights, act to minimize the appearance of the upper levels. Sky Hotel PD - Detailed Review Exhibit A.2, Commercial Design Review Criteria Page 3 of 5 P27 VI.A. The project does not contain any traditional street-level commercial spaces. The street level includes hotel rooms and associatedfunctions (lobby, check-in, etc). An airlock is incorporated into the entry. The roof has been designed to be a usable space. All mechanical equipment has been grouped and screened, and extensive landscaping is included in the design. The roof also incorporates green roof areas that are incorporated into the required drainage. Staiffinds the following Guidelines are met: 1.34 Maintain the distinction between the street level and upper floors. 1.35 A new building should be designed to maintain the stature of traditional street level frontage. 1.36 Minimize the appearance of a tall third floor. 1.37 The first floor faQade should be designed to concentrate interest on the first level, using the highest quality of design, detailing and materials. 1.39 Incorporate an airlock entry into the plan for all new structures 1.44 A large building should reflect the traditional lot width in form and variation of its roof. This should be achieved through the following: â€¢ Reflect the traditional lot width in the roof plane 1.45 The roofscape should be designed with the same design attention as the secondary elevations of the building. Stqfflinds the following Guidelines are not applicable: 1.33 Any new building shall be designed to maintain a minimum of 9 feet from floor to ceiling on all floors. 1.38 The retail entrance should be at sidewalk level. 1.40 Window area along the first floor shall be a minimum of 60% of exterior street facade area when facing a principal street(s). 1.41 Where appropriate a building shall be designed to maintain the character and transparency of the traditional street level retail. 1.42 Design of the first floor storefront should include particular attention to the following: â€¢ The basic elements and proportions of storefront design. â€¢ Depth and strength of modeling. â€¢ The palette of materials and finishes used in both the structural framework and the storefront window. â€¢ The concentration of architectural detail to ensure a rich visual experience. â€¢ The complementary use of signage and lettering to enhance the retail and downtown character. â€¢ The use of lighting to accentuate visual presence. 1.43 Retail frontage facing onto side courts or rear alleys should follow similar design principles to the street frontage adjusted for the scale of space Sky Hotel PD - Detailed Review Exhibit A.2, Commercial Design Review Criteria Page 4 of 5 P28 VI.A. Architectural Materials Staff Finding: The guidelines recommend that durable, quality materials be used in the development ofnew buildings and that "all facades of a building should reflect, complement and enhance the evolvingform and character ofthe center city." The materials include wood siding, stone veneer, and stucco finishes. A Staff supports the proposed materials, with the exception of the stucco. Stqffrecommends that the wood siding replace the stucco. The stucco is located on the highest portions of the building, above the various forms of wood siding. Staff recommends that the wood siding be continued up to the roof line. Stufffinds the following Guidelines are met: 1.46 High quality, durable materials should be employed. 1.47 Building materials should have these features: â€¢ Convey the quality and range of materials seen traditionally. â€¢ Reduce the perceived scale ofthe building and enhance visual interest if the fagade. â€¢ Covey a human scale. â€¢ Have proven durability and weathering characteristics within Aspen's climate. 1.48 A building or addition should reflect the quality and variation in material seen traditionally. 1.49 Where contemporary materials are use they shall be: â€¢ High quality durability and finish â€¢ Detailed to convey a human scale â€¢ Compatible with a traditional masonry palette Stafffinds the following Guidelines are not applicable: 1.50 Materials used for third floor accommodation setback from the street faÂ¢ade(s) should be more subdued than the primary facades. Paving and Landscaping Staff Finding: The guidelines encourage paving and landscaping that enhances the immediate setting of the project. In this case, the public amenity is adjacent to the street right of way, located in a second level deck, and located on the roof. Existing street trees are proposed to be maintained with no changes to the sidewalk as both meet city standards. The project's paving and landscaping complement the design and add important pedestrian amenities to the properly. Sta#jinds the following Guidelines are met: 1.51 Paving and landscaping should be designed to complement and enhance the immediate setting of the building area. Sky Hotel PD - Detailed Review Exhibit A.2, Commercial Design Review Criteria Page 5 0 f 5 P29 t VI.A. THE SKY HOTEL PLANNED DEVELOPMENT DETAILED REVIEW APPLICATION P30 DURANT STREET LEGEND r. Cf!,UN&'~C[ UL[10[7 - - - - PROPERTY UNE rowland+broughton E WIDTH MIN: kâ„¢AN./EMENT lic~#tatue / u- dasig,1 / 4,~e,10, dfs,gr; - Â· - Â· - 5' SETBACK 214 e ~Â»Â£â€¢.,fe 1030.I./.200 301308.13730 303.36~1375' - 190-0-1 01 ; 4% Lit \1 _bi11 - 11 Â· PROPER..4 NOTES 1 1 1 1 + 3 F--1 E-7 UNLESS Oâ„¢ERWiSE STATED ...... 1. LAYOUT DiMENSIONS ARE FROMâ„¢EBACK OFCURI U Â¤ IPEDESTRIABIREN*YALOY-~ B DESIGN; PEDESTRIAN-SCALED 4, 11 d PAVING.BOLLARDS. UGHTING , 3005sprlngst,su~~e~02 DUMONT 9704~9499 f 97042974990 CHATEAU aÂ®en, co ~1611 1. %0 ...SEME. 10.8' WIDE DRAINAGEAND va,rw luegiecll'oen corn BWIDTHMIN; -2: 1 - 18Â· WHIE PRIVATE. NON EXCLUSM - INGRESS/E'GRESSEASEMENT FOR CHATEAU CHAUMONT AND CHABU 07.14.15 DUMONT DETAILED REVIEW APPL[CAEON |LOCATION: --r-~ 6' WIDE DRAINAGE AND 1 1 ~ p....... UTILITY EASEMENT i) \ | IMAX 2% CROSS- C== 9 1 3 v I in / C ==U . 1= i j L * - JU 1_11= 1. 2 7 ~ 1 11- r L ~ 4-,4U.~ PUBLIC PEDESTRIAN EASEME.-Â·-Â·Â·- - ~ AUEY f I ]1 1 1 - | pROIRIUM PLANÂ·TER . 1 , 11 lEif- 4 1- 5 GLORY HOLE + , CONDOMINIUMS f.h %-3 li N"=1- 1 ,-- 1=1-r - -cr- -cr TED.7~~"~' SKY HOTEL 9 1 4 %=211 1(/ 1 ~ !. SLOPE ONALL ~7 ~- - /1 ASPEN,CO 81611 709 E. DURANT AVENU 4.1 1 1 -I--- PRIVATE RESIDENCE 5' SETBACK \ EXISTING ALPS PARKING F 1. . 1 PROPER. UNE F='ST--49Â» /2 7 - SLOPE ON ALL 217 -NORTH Â®ARAMP= *z ~ ~ PROJECTNO: ENHANCED PED '44 21406 /2 IACCESSPOINT, DWGFLE ~TYPIAL . ./ m BG L SERIES SKY HOTEL * ASPEN ALPS CONDOM~NIUMS SHEET TITLE STREET LEVEL |TOUAILE- LAYOUT PUAN ISITE PLAN E-3 Mi*96-1 PUaUCPEDEWRIAN Eâ€¢5EMENT SCALE: ~< L200 PRELIMINARY 52626 Â» NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION . - LABEL Fl~SHEOGRADE NATURALORADE RESTRICTIi,E TaPOGRAPInÂ· OVER MOST RESTRICTIVE VEA011~ < .-/ ELEVATION ELEVATIONOF ELEVANONOF MOST ROOF HEIGHT OVER ACRk ROOF HEIGHT SUI?VEYOR 1 7042.7 Tge-4Â· PROPOSED 7981/ ..le 2 7941'-9- 7942., PROPOSED 7981Â·.I 39-'/ 3 7941'-I 794.-1 PROPOSED 7981'Â·/ 39-5 79,11'./ 7043Â·I PROPOSED 7981'-/ .-5 5 79... 7@39'- I PROPOSED . Â» .-8 E223 Tg.9Â· 793~.8Â· NATURAL 7978-7 ..11- 7937.I 793r-1(7 PROPOSED Â¥Td/ ..5 . 7037'-11' M.I PROPOSED 7@71Â·.5 33-6 rowland+broi 2-Â«f 794~'- i 7943-1 pROPOSE 7975Â·, . , /--1 790~-I ... 98 -I 22-7 a,ch,Â»chr,0/A,ende,n/i 10 79.-3 79,lie.I PROPOSED 79.-7 23,le *ave. 18~blakeÂ«,Ii. 200 12 - 7047-10Â· N~TURAL 7973Â·5 30.5 11 79,/-0Â» 794.-2/I PROPOSED 79,1.-. .... â€¢seeâ€¢ co 8161 1 denve, co.202 3033081373/ 970544.34731 30130&13751 14 W. C PROPOSED *.I 33-I 7937 .- < *.*- ' -- 15 WOÂ· 7843-, PROPOSED 19?3.I 37.I . 794,f.2- NATURAL 7971'.. ... - ' 17 ?ge'll PROPOSED 7gle.r 39-I 1 kJ A V 18 79/7 7.1 ... PROPOSED 7101-I 32-4 i i 2 li f I F ' ,:19 19E. I 7815'./ NATURAL 797e.I 3,Â·.1Â· 1 - 5/7 __- ,"mawaw"JEEP 20 7.47-0 .sÂ·r NATURAL 7073.I ..7 . \~ -4,1. NATURALGRADEISINTERPOLATEDGRADE PER'-~~, 21 79,EÂ·1/ 7945Â·-1 NATURAL ..r Cc,la~- . 7.... 79,4.11Â· N~TURAL lg?5-7 ... /1 CMUSURVEY DOCUMENTS / 1 b. . 11, 23 ./.-I 7944:â€ž4Â» NATURAL 7Â§?3-9 Â·'' | 2. DORMERS MEET EXCLUSION 26.675.020. F~g. 1 24 - W.gr -TURAL 78DiÂ·-r 3r-10 / I LESS THAN 60% OF ROOF 1 1 4 25 794Â¢.1 7g,#Â· r NATURAL. 7981'-11Â· 37'- 10Â· n 7.2 ?'1 | 3.CHIMNEYS, FLUES, & VENTS ALLMEET EXCLUSION ~ 1 26 79.- 10Â· 780.11Â· NATURAL. 7g83'-I ... 445 >r 26.576.F.4.a 27 7@e-5Â· NATURAL 7981~-10" .-5 0 3 _ 4. ELEVATOR ENCLOSURE MEETS EXCLUSION 28 - 796.4 NATURAL 7087-I .8 2.m,FAL, 4 ~ | 6. ROOFTOP RAIUNGS MEETEXCLUSION 26.676.F.4.d ~ ,,1' m 7913-12 N,TURAL 7981'-le 38.11. 141 ----3 0 1 1 26.576.F.4.c / 29 7943.11 NATURAL 7983 - I ..11" | 6. MECH EQUIPMEETEXCLUSIONS 26.676.F.4.e 31 - 7912- . N~TURAL 1'35:-T ... 7. TRELUS. ROOFTOP AMENITIES (BAR. BUILT-INS.,,d 32 Ii-er NRTUR~L 1W8.I ..1 4- 00 321* .... 41 1.BBQ, FIREPITS, POOL, SPAS MEET EXCLUSIONS.' 33 7947-0- %AL *1Â·-I 30.7- ,,.<26.R.F.4.k , 14 7@43Â·-I NATLmAL 7971Â·.. ... E 1 32/i t)1.,1,190, t.-HITEAU--7Â£~---| CHATEAU ,-/ ,- DUMONT /-'' CHAUMONT -,/ , 0 3-STOR~/ 13-STORY~: + 4-2,0''ll ./7 E B Az j &41 /{ I ~ ~~ -'.1 .~aN \11 114 4 8 / / /4 1 1 111 1 541 _ - ---. 1 , . ul ' Â·t .V mÂ· 7 : Vbt - MECH& KiTCHEN EXHAUST /14 '"~: 2 preOSURE , ,, I 21 - 2 /r -f-74 -4*7 --2--1.-- - ,------- ------ 71.------h=-=-r-3,0--1------, ..r '1 ' i==. .:. ~E-EV,- .-g / -- 1 ./ 1 1 12 - - 1 I 1 Â£ a ' .' ./---- 'Â· 4-1=pl ' rn-- 1 ,/' CONDOMINIUMS | - ' 1-~LORY HOLE ~ ~ ROOF ~ I 7945 -190 3-STORY) | | -fi / /SEE ' 3 -r I 11'.1.11'.,1- / / 41. 11 THEUTTLE !11 07" 5- .~ ~ ~~<L~j~~~-k* ~ ~-. i~Ici. 1 Ill 1 1 NELL HOTEL i # 1. :/... LOUNGEDECK.I< 4-WORY) Â· 2. Â· . V. i' ~ ~ ~~~ , .~_- : ~7 1 7946 ~ TRELUG ALJOVE ' 1] ICI ~ 0 - ir r- SKY HOTEL '*200-=11~ -.. U li I /1 --- DEGIi.REA . - 70Â» , - lEI % '1 11960 1 ::11 -1 - 1 - -L= . 'd + 1 -9, 4, ' 709Â£.DU~NTAVE - - -1 ./1 .,Er ',;4-w- a-,ir=71 = 1 4.// 1 PRN~TE 7 F.Jey'l Â· Â·~F 1 .:i /~ 1| '''iESIDENCE | 1 | ASPEN,C081611 h -Li = 1 1 1,72 11 4/7 .'''- . 3Â·/1 ./1 -- ....:.1, .,C I - -4=4 /1 1 L-2 L. B 8 /Â¢, SEELEVE. -- ". - *4-- + -1---- 1__........1_____~k I / I. ii 86228a~QBIX2!8X / ,â‚¬Â»-----1 L- L----1 11.----< Â«.. - r,5 ~ ''~~ .:.... PROJECT NO / 21406.80 L-7- r=ir /Â»1 0 4 </ S-'~SPEN ALPS / BUILDING - / '2-STORY) SHEETTITLE LEGEND /7 12 .%K-* ,Â·4 1 - HEIGHT OVER t . I. 0 - FINISHED GRADE TOPOGRAPHY 1 / 0 | - NATURALGRADE | 6 i 14 (1 - / f ~ 21.1-HEIGHTOVERTOPOGRAPHYPLAN ~ ~ , Lit>' SCALE .#1/ H Â® / 1 -*<**Ii-7-/$ --.--1 EVEd 262MitILL:1 LODGE 0 8% 10011 SUBGRADE BASEMENTWALLEXPOSURE SFCALCULATIONS ~ a | 1380 SE (1335 NET ~ F.t 120.F COMMERCIAL fDOSE NET LEASABLE 9,3/. 10[XIE OSF NET LIVABIE - I ~. 13323SF 170Â®SE LODGE 11 1. SF NET U.ABLE . \ %*fir | 386 SF COMMERCIAL 34Â¢SFNETLEASABLE OSF RESIDENCES g ~; [S ~%2[ E!!I SIERM-L-- -1 OSF RESIDENCES SFNET LIVABLE . -IÂ· =Ll<zz~Â£4~-- Â°:1 ' t/i"il *~~~~ ' ;4 - Abll -1 k\\11\ -2 PERSUBGRADECALCULAâ„¢76'*EXPOSURE ./.1 9/ OSF 1,876 SF A.HUI 17/.NET UVABLE +2422! SF hÂ©4UNITgpACF:lie}'1 %12Â£ --- -1.122 11//2 1./.JIT SPACE,LUAH' ~ 33653.F TOTAL AR. --Ii' 25967 SF TOTAL.REA - - -~---I~Il &#Hame** rowland+broughton UNITSPACE (L) ' LODGE LEVEL' PERSUBGRADE CALCULATIONS = 789 SFFLODR AREA 1 = 20.255 FLOOR AREA 80*lore/Jibandes~~/inkudes,n 9312 SF 1588 SF(1454 NE- T ' -Â· --1. UNITSPACE(L) BELOWGRA[JETOTAL 1039.F BELOWGRADE TOTAL 1057 SF 234, hopkinsave 1830 ./' .0 0. .5EMENT 27â€¢3. BASEMENT 1,057 SF 0 Â® 1 - -*... 1 Â® (.SEMEN'COUNTEDAS 'TORY.ACE) 0.pen Â¢08~611 denli co~020. I LODGE 1 22 i '1 /~'A SPRING STREET OAEST ELEVATION) 970544347" 30330B 13751 ~ SOUTHWEST DIAGONAL 970 54-0 303Â®al'230 4 u 11&12 (1614 NEE 1 11 LODGE 1-.-di - I i} t) 20512 (1941 NET) UNITSPACE(L)-r----- - - O 222 A.H.U. 212 -7.-. r FmmnA - ' 991,-'-2/.5,/5~*AS, LEVEL 1 159 SF LEVEL 1 1,093SF COMM ~--- -_ ~ _ ~---1-2~0'_ Lf~ (D LODGE BASE),IENT 689 SF 8ASEMENT 2382SF 1114 '11111'1111111 BELOWGRADETOTAL 648 SF 8ELOWGRADETOTAL 3475SF Ccnsdlanls ~OSFNED~~ 0 =HN~IT I _ Â» SOU-~STDIAGONAL Â® ASPENALPS ACCESS (SOUTH ELEVATION) ~1 - F-------------7 --*~0~(81"ET) ~ 19139 SF ~ 4= UNITSPACEN afty>7/XÂ«$Â«//340*73 - 2212 LODGE *Wal E#*82%%82%%*%%%88%%8a Illilll/A . dia.2 LEVEL' 36DSF LEVELI OSF @ 1600 SF n. -M--- - -- (4010 NET) 8ASEMENT 945 SF BASEMENT 24. SF UNITSPACE (L) /4 BELOWGRACETOTAL 131]SF SELOWORADETOTAL 2446 SF Â© Â®aSE (344 NET) ~ ORIGINAL STREET (EAST ELEVATION) ~ ALLEY (NORTH ELEVATION) 46 PROPOSED BASEMENT LEVEL FLOOR AREA CALCULATION ~2 PROPOSED LEVEL ONE FLOOR AREA CALCULATION . '22 f /'/A Issue liu / Â·, 55551 - #09%22*882%2% 07 142015 DETAILED REVIEW NON-UNIT<UCLAH) 222 LEVEL' OSF LEVEL' LODGE BASEMENT 236 SF BASEMENT 1537 SF APPLICATION 8ELOWORACE TOTAL 236 SF BELGVGRADE TOTAL 1 647 SF 4422Â£ (405 NET) ~ LODGE ~h ALLEY (SOUTH ELEV) ~~3 ALLEY (SOUTH ELEV) 1262 LODGE 1.EMEL-2 = 14 017 0 (1214 NED 176]OSF .{]GE 13,568 SF NET LVABLE 1*.SE(1248 NED--3 ~ 24 000SF LODGE /%SFNET LIVABLE p.- 3.00.F COMMERC. 2903.F NET LEASABLE . I OSF COMMERCIAL SFNET LEASABLE OSF RESIDENCES SF NET LIVABLE NON-UNIT{UC/AH) RESIDENCES Sf NET LIVABLE - 1 DSF AHU SFNET'kABLE 237-Si= AHU SFNET UVABLE r k>777394 _ UNITSPACE(L) .2.2 NONÂ·l/T SPA' 11/6/Al - 4 - r. 1221.2 No'+IJNIT SPACE finAIii 1324 SF 23,795 GF TOTALAR. i._. 24,794 SF TC}TAB . 24/,06$5440$4440$44 - I LODGE I 22.2(3200 NET; 1 4 ~ ~ LEVEL 1 OSE 8ASEMENT 1,062 SE LODGE r BELOWGRADE TOTAL 1062SF 11 LODGE 26452(2442 MET) : ] COMM. Â® DURANT AVE. (NORTH ELEV.) te[GE r1 -.* l 13112(1282 NET) 2=2(1933 NED r-- -- t ,-- -08ZE(1940 NED . - LODGE UNIT SPACE IL) 1 . - LODGEUNIT LEVEL' 2 243 SF 1947. 87% 3026 SF (2793 NED 2272 , 1 TOTALWALLAR. ABOVEGRAD[ %ABOVEGRADE l NON-UNIT(UC/AH) NON-UNITAUCHAH) , 1 A BASEMENT 2743 SF OSF 0% 4 1 21711Â£ .ION-LINIT (UC/AH) ;t~ -- - i.' 11 2702Â£ iiESF- --t-- ----~ ~-- LEVELI OSF OSF WA (20[)DIET) B .' I . -4 1 . . BASEMENT 12B2 SF 225. 18% 2,11Â§Â£ 1 :4 1 ~-- :-3--Â· /;-1 LODGE LODGE ' | ' NON-UNIT(UCIAH) LEVEL' 574SF 415. ./ 1 1 , 1 41 689. OSF 0% 222 (786 NET) 1212-\ -: i LEVEL' 1985. 892.F 45% i In 222 LODGE (1334 NED ' -- D | 1 BASEMENT 2382 SF OSF 0% LODGEUNIT LEVEL 787 SF 410. 53% \4.- ' w *-8422Â£ (786 NET) . 4 ' L - - E UNIT SPACE (L) (2000 NET) LEVEL 1 2.040 SF 2040.F 100% 29-1* BASEMENT 94561: LODGE ill.Itt -T< - BASEMENT 2 446. 04 - EML_/-6 F ~~Â«*17 14XSE 1762 SF(1641 NET) ~- ~I ~SEMENT 236 SE D SE 0% - ~ LODGE 21Â§72(1979 NED LEVEL 1 0 SE 0 SF NIA LODGE UN]T G 2175 SF LEVEL 1 1130.F 1020 SF 9D. 3927 SF LODGE (2000 NET) BASEMENT 1537 SF OSF 0% TERRACE ~. ~ _ - H LEVEL 1 724SF 724 SF SKY HOTEL BASEMENT 10162 SF OSF 0% (3607 NET) 29722 (2737 NET) J % ABOVE GRADE AVERAGES LEVEL 1 - 9.483 SF TOTAL WALL AREA - 78% EXPOSED /7% PROPOSED LEVEL TWO FLOOR AREA CALCULATION ~ PROPOSEDLEVEL THREE FLOOR AREA CALCULATION BASEMENT -13 097 SF TOTAL WALL AREA - 2.38% EXPOSED t.j 1....0 ty 1. Â·40Â·D 709 E. DURANT AVE SUBGRADE AREA CALCULATIONS ASPEN CO 81611 LEVEL 1 25,967 Â· (.78) = 20,254 SF TO COUNT TO FLOOR AREA LODGE UNIT UM=d E=LE,21 BASEMENT. 33,653 - 500 = 33,153 SF BASEMENT â€¢ 2 0238) = 789 SF TO COUNT TO FLOOR AREA 18482Â£ \ t365OSF LODGE 12,937 SF NET LIVABLE OSF [0[*3E PER SECTION 26575.020 0 7 GARAGES & CARPORTS MIXED USE PROJECTS WITH RESIDENTIAL (1767 NED COMMERCIAL OSFNET LEASABLE OSF COM~ERCIAL 133 S NET LEASABLE UNITS, 250 SF OF GARAGE PER RESIDENCE IS EXCLUDED FROM FLOOR AREA CALCULATIONS. 0 8, RESIDENCES OSF NET OVABLE OSF RESIDENCES 1 oSF AHU OSFNET UVABLE OSF AH.U. PROJECT HAS (2) AH UNITS/RESIDENTIAL, THUS 500 SF EXCLUDED THEN PER SECTION iL121Â£ NOI+UNITSPACEILOAH} â€¢OSF 1404UNITSPACE 26 575 020 D 8, S UB<GRADE GA RAG ES, THE GARAGE EXEMIPTION IS TAKEN FROM THE TOTAL 16771 SF TOTALAH. -7 T TOTAL AREA GROSS BELOW-GRADE AREA PRIOR TO CALCULATING THE SUBGRADE EXEMPTION. 500 SF EXEMPT TAKEN FROM THE TOTAL SUB-GRADE GROSS SF) -1,131 -4 4 LODGE UNIT 11 h TERRACE ' b, 1 1 'r Â£2058 NED J LODGE UNIT ZIO-SE I 4,, Ll I + . , 2QÂ«SE (2023 NET) ELEVATOR- U I ~ PNOJECT NO EXEMPT 4 2140660 i LODGE UNIT FROM FAR ON " 2222 (2070 NED TOP FLOOR Avj NON.UNIT (UC/All) r--==k - 44Â·:~ 411-1.-tr k , =0 3 065 SF TERRACE . + COMM SHEETTITLE 2272 A %?-f : 1 L.,Jui,ziEU jÂ» 1 1 OSF LODGE UNIT i I LODGE UNIT 133 SF{NED + . 4,1 Â·Â· 4- d Cia 12 Â·_LE PROPOSED FLOOR -- :-1 AREA CALCULATIONS 1965 SF - 1 1 1764 SF 1- - 11 (1856 NET) (1629 NET) l SOLE U ..ati < 2 LODGE UNIT / - NON-UNIT (UCIAH) -- ~ 56&!i PDO.5 : 126/ (1534 NET, rih p RopoSED LEVEL FOUR FLOOR AREA CALCULATION ~h PROPOSEDROOF LEVEL FLOOR AREA CALCULATION . 5 Poe & r.,0, , Pl"' 1...D' - Â£#Ed [22-J DURANTAVE ~ 11 /4 4% \\ /2 /6 ./2 P X ' 0~ rowland+broi i: 4\ i LA#ip w \ Â·Â· q n k ' n n - --1 - 9 t_-1 - .....0/.r..../1 1830 tlake' 0 200 9 * S.* den.el co~0/2 30330813730 c-El ... . - 1 Â·Â· 9705443â€¢?31 30&308.1375" iii=Â« fl igÂ»9* 11 i Â·'rE ric. 4 1\11/ i :-22.-~~Â· -EASTA'%' AA /....3 X. 11 1 .5. BIKE ~CK :'Â· Â· ii i: oRrlÂ· Â·Â·.Â· Cen*. \L-&2%.WRACO[]E I- ~.# ' - . 1,Â·0~ SETBACK 46=91 9 - Â· - ld:_| I EXN _/ CHATEAU- CHATEAU DUMONT CHAUMONT 1 3-STORY) (3-STOR,1 :84 : 2 1 --Ind 5: 1.. ~ - >14 1=.e EÂ· -a I I : 81 r. F LI APPLICATION 07.14.2015 DETAILED t:i REVIEW -7- - --U , 77-9 r.tm EXE- PLNTR EXISTiNGDUMDI.rpAR# ! r , EXIS-UTI&ITY .~ i , - -, ~ %,/6#42,;,=(1 0 ' Â· 2 2 1 6 ALLEY EEC) ._i, I ..RETAININGWALL e..OVE DRIVE LANE E : / 1' , 1...OVEPLANTER LE.ST."'INGETBACK- ~| -HRAISFD,ir.- 0.-HRAmEDPLANTER -. __ _ ti [*~ ..30-HPLNTR ..I - 1 0.-I aL_ i ~*-JLL--JEZ'DEV~" 4 - 12;~M"N--N ---1 1=24/725 - 1 1 rpl* TR,â€¢SHCEUVERIES v.SITEVALL&PLANT.3 T EX' =331 3.3EHTOTALSTEPSFROM ' GLORYHOLE SIDEMU<TODRIVELANESURFACE, / CONDOMINIUMS . MAIN BUTOUÂ¥224 HINSET~CK LESS / gl 1 C ENTRYÂ£)<IT THAN-HINSETBACK- [3-STORY' _12" SETBACK THE UTTLE : 1 NELL HOTEL 1 -1 9 E (4-STORY 1 --34- 1 N ' 4--ru- 4-1 1 1 al- friFEL SKY HOTEL ', ~ PRIVATE 1 WN , 1 . Â· 4 2 j S.1. UP TO [=1 / I RESIDENCE ~ j 'C~l LOUNGE'DECK -- -- -- -1- - - - - '2-STORY) Il I:4 -,4'..27Â·r . - ''Â»c/ '' 3, '\ t 709 E. DURANTAVE. 31 1 0 ..--_-' LAN[}SCAPEAREA EXISTINE'ALPS 9* \ i ASPEN CO 81611 1 -j* 7%9 F <i '41; 44 /7 /i// j I \FU // f 0 '104,7 / --------- ---/ ' ALPS ACCESS/DRIVEWAY / ., vâ‚¬:(43-->74/ %1// 1% ..\\ r:,1~ 3-:.T/mi / BUILDING ~ ASPEN ALPS i 1. .- . 467 1 ..'. 1.-S'. 1 \ 472?30 ~ PR~ECT NO ' r 21â€¢406.60 I / C O / SHEETITLE 1 1 2 1 PROPOSED SITE PLAN \ ~~ 1~~~/L~~ 1 SCALE 1/18Â«=1'q _ PD1.1 li F AR& F. Â·11 ./4~LK Â£* t't'Ed PROPOSED PUBLIC AMENITY SPACE STREETLEVELAREA 343OSF SlaTOTAL 2ndLVLPATIO 1362 SF 221 %2? PUBLIC f?OOF DECK 6575 SF TOTAL 11367 SF .1AL (474%~ rowland+broughton NEILOTAREA 2400l sF arch-jure/urbeldes./in~gdawn 234ehq,kinsave . Nake 't sle 'l]0 a~pen .81511 denve, co 80202 970/4.0060 30330813730 970.5,14 3,173 303305,13751 PROPOSEOPUBLIC 6 4 -PROPOSED PUBLIC 1 ....:... 2,5753' 1 855 SF SIDE/A.1< le**4-44311<11/1111/1/111/1/ EkfittffidÂ»-4/_ff Ms- Aftif 1 2.2 ~ -_--Â·* i --1 1 1-'LUM 44 ' 3Â·tkÂ·PiwAN//xhx/AF,,----<~ >Â»Â«449 f ' CHATEAU CHATEAU - ULÂ¥ f DUMONT CHAUMONT dr. 1 1 A 9.1122~ 9-Will ~~~ ..STORY) 13.STORY, 15~UG ' 07.14.2015 DETAILED REVIEW APPLICATION 11 20 Â«I:3 1 1 =71 -: 01 - -/ 9 f '1 4 4 -2 =/ t / /\7 -ru_ \ POOL /br- = ' ALLEY 5/21 37Â·t~\824' \ %Au< N 'DEWALK A 41 -ill 11 1 11 PLANTER Al PLANTER jj 40;55*1 -dÂ·Â· 1 Â«09 1.c=:n = --~EZED ////////Ill EUV tzil@ 1-~' -~1~1,Â£*b/&1 GLORYHOLE 1 ==1 CONDOMINIUMS I li Â»Â«*4'~~>1%, ....... 2*,2112:Â· el}IHII IllILI i 91 [-1'f' 1 (3-STORY) 4[4443Â« THE LITTLE PROPOSEDPUBLIC-k â€ž, JI , / / / / / /iou.- 0~c~ mt// AMENITÂ¢SPACE f: -~~ pt.~~~ER *>63-*f~ - *1~ ENI 0- \ 1 E---~=t----- SKY HOTEL * 1- 1 NELL HOTEL :MAWDECK ' 1 510>RU -3 2 1 /.. \ m tal- 1 1 --l =. 6-11.:11 r.4-9. PRIVATE 709 E. DURANT AVE. 1-. in'E:111 -- - 2/ I c.comi \ 111 -1.-=N 1 RESIDENCE ASPEN, CO 81611 \ â€¢008===6#*77&7* U L-L, I. ' PROPOSE'Pus'IC 4492Â«r 1 1 *TYSPACE I 2NDLEVELPATiO 1.362. *V,4~.~317*24 FfÂ«*Em& 07427/00 . / ' ALPS ACCESS/DRIVEWAY Â«4 /%0 P /Â· / d PROJECT NO 21406.60 4 N / ASPEN ALPS V BUILDING '-STORÂ¥' SHEET 'TLE PROPOSED PUBLIC O AMENITY SPACE PLAN 0 SCALE 1/16Â»=1Â·# 2 1/ 1 -2 PD1.3b : 5 . I i lill P ARFA WALK SOUTHSPRINGSTRFFT /.4/1/\\1-5 DROPOFFAREA SIDEWALK StpEd -010 ~ rowland-â€¢broi I -*.Lki 1 I ki' I 234 e * ve 1830 blake * slÂ® 200 970344 34/i 3(0.308,13751 970.S44 00060 3033081373' ~peâ€¢ G081611 denvei.608020' _ Â» Pla.ICSIDevu< _ - PROPERTÂ¥Â·WN. Â· - CcomllÂ»nls ~ Â·Â· Â· th ,Â»LANDSCAPE AREA h # tr 6 J \ a.. lili SNOW STORAGE/SNOW SHEDDING NOTES 41 SNOISTORAGEAREA 11.- t. t; 1 ALL SLOPEDROOFAREAS 'DESIGITED SNOWEENCEAREASBELOWI'll RETAJNSNOVANITHSNCWFENCES AN[),CACUPS I,WEGUTIERADONGPOUTS ' fli TO COLLECT AND OISPERSE WATER HEAT TRACE.. . INSTALLED AT SPECIFIC 2 ALLFLATROOFS AN. PLANTERS./RETAINSNOWASDESIGNED AREASASDESIGNED 3 ALLDECKAREAS.VE!43.8.NOm..DREGIONS OTHER.REASNOT SNOWMELTED VEL BE MNNTAINED,SHOVELED INTO SNO.,1.TED REGIONS 5 SIDEWA.. DENDIED AT SNOWMELTED ARE U+SLAB TUBE RACIANT HEATING EXIT 6 Â· - COK'IECTED TO CENTRALSYSTEM CONTROLS FORTEMPANDMOISTURE 6 LANDSCAPEDAREASWILL ACTASSNOWSTORAGEAREAS fy-ti.. ' . CE . - - REVIEW 07.14.2015 DETAILED \ 6\ 4 {27 ., :I=t~-t Ms APPLICATION 1 6, i L - Ar. _L _2Â· 2.1 1$ r [CRE) 1 I __ JL'.-,1 1 ' /90'69.. IllÂ·5 i 4: j ALLEYPLOWED~NOW,INTAINEDASEXISTING EZED PROPERTY LINE </P~NTER SN~ST*EARe IL Â»e 1 E1 =40- Â·A Itc .tr f . . 1 8..-11-t- Â· HH & -1 Â» -4 6- * H - " -+ H; H'I 11 - EXIT IRASH/DEUVERIES EXIT i ..8/0 loe.K ''/ $ INOV,~ELTED)- I ./ \f.1 11 MNNENTRY 1 l\E,1 1-3 / .3 1 41: 1 % f]F SKY HOTEL id 1 Intl ; E==ik: 1 1- 1 / 78 E. DURANTAVE ~1 ENO,MaTED I ASPEN, CO 81611 i , AREA @ CARACE | i 4:1 #*MP- 1+ A /~/UIB LE*- ~t iti~~~ 8,46 4 6 ; i F T \ 4 \ -1 \\ j 1 1/1(41 /0 -- 2 ~ lnF Tr19 A*AA-NT.INEDAND~LOWED : BE \1 \ 1 CARAGE WIDS-1}FARFA B, 1 \ r ''r i t | I ENTRY DOWSTAGEAREA :! e ' ..A\. \\ 1 4 lilli -3 / I / \ '1 -1 //~'~y ."--21-=I- 7 - - 'I'*'RÂ¥Â¥0~- 1 1 1 ~z.~ _-' _.1_ L PUBLICSIDEV~LK 1 -3 M iSNOWMELTED)- 1 _ 4. ~,7 ----' /299 11 1 / PeECTNO S~MELTED)-. . 0 -, 1 - .4*1- / Of - t 21406.80 / ' SHEETTITLE 1 SNOW STORAGE & 0 Â· SNOWSHEDDING PLAN 7 ' FUN TRUE SCALE: 1/16" =1'-0" 7 -1 - 4014, -- 03 PD1.4 - ~7~ Il.4 - Levell Snow Storage Man -11.... â€ž.=1 .-97 1 blÂ©t.'LK ........... rowland+broughton Gte ...0 303.308.13730 ar-re//*anUM'n/,7.U... 234, h'pkw,5 ave I/ blake ~ 5!e 200 0'p,nco8// denve, Â£080202 070 S44347. 301~13751 STAFF 4 STAFF *4/41 ....Al O,21+49 , . , --m-F --L'It-tt-#buci-1 .,NCE w Consillmnh 1, b OERS CORRIDOR 2 . El= 13541;+47453/milri= rp--- I.'T_L-|| 1 'Â£'Ric ~ l_-1 0 U r 43 13; = i MEETING PRI'*,CrION "*m 07.14.2015 DETAILED ROOMS | SPACE REVIEW - 1 ' 9.3 APPUCATION r.r ' Uil! 0 i L r*M 'TC~ERT -1 i 4 1 L.1 Tin--g g . 1 0 IP ~~ 1 4 & n -~ 1 'ECH CE 0 -- 'gr' ...Â·SETBACK I."I.E.W.J. Upi 1 46- CHASE, :11,111,11'11,111'1 0 1111,16.4.,4,111'lltilll,fl'1.1111,11111'I'lili 4 0 - LUCKU<S ELEV. ' i ~ ~~li~~ *WA,1,2~~~~+ -117-17 r 1 Ftp * .~yeSETBACK OfaCE V i /1 4.TAC:ED 33TACKE) . R 11 |iN. 1[3 2{ B PAR INGSP.PES -1 1 (~R~E WTOTALPARKINGSPACES i ~ r ~ PARIONG I ' =. fl 01 i o JJYU . 0 - E-------------- SKY HOTEL . *Ill thit i., 1 1 r--t~ W. ACK-/W~ ~ U 5 0 -., O 709 E. DURANT AVE. ASPEN, CO 81611 4 11 8 6 6 1 1/r- 6\' J â€¢1:,1- 11 7 FAI #-mo.U.S ) 1 '~ \~RKING;PN~Ea Fri '' 1, t' '' *: :1 '~~ : ~ 4, 1 1 4 Q 1 0 - 9 5 ' ' Em'-p.m... 8 1 k % 1 7 2 .-----1 \ %'% ..0,0441. ' I \ ' ' \ # / i / 44\ I ./ 44 k . PROJECTNO 2tÂ®6/ V SHEETTiTLE BASEMENT Ll FLOOR PLAN PLAN TRLE NORTH NOPTH ~ 1 j PR.D-Basementl.1 Plan 02 SCALE:_1516Â· = 10' < PD2.0 : 40 ,f[)2.1~ SCALE lile= 1.0. 4 11'RE LD,Ed rowland-*broi ' 09 C<-P C -- 303.308.13751 97054400000 30330B,3nl 234'hop-,- 1830N,ke* Ile 200 5 -*11 den- c.80203 11 \\ *SIDEVALK i b 4 3 i: il 1 1 PlANTERS Cm.- 1 k Â¥-6 g_01*n 1--~==~--P = 1_lu|1[12] L= Elli = 8 #; / ; i i '~2_777 Â£52 sr~11 bÂ·-1, 91 ,Â· 5'-e SETBACK ' 4 &Â·-~-.rr.rnT~Ir-9 -I ---- -- - -LE ''Â·530 K\lj iNEN ~ p*/0111Â·-, Ijs .IR i \ 16 1***191)11:]r ELEC \\ 1=wÂ·aa,d Glmmil#,JI-; UTI-Ti ./. 1 779- g M 1 1 ur-7 Imp- 11â€¢ - CHATEAU: CHATEAU : --- i 1 1 DUMONT , CHAUMONT 3.STOR 1 (3-STORY} . u- &*dd-| F'84,1. 1 'g~ I U,P S i 1-8 41 Me" It~b9MtI -4 j t REVIEW 07.14.2015 DETAILED 5 i APPLICATION AA - 0 O, u E --- r 1 0 Ul 4===2 EXISTIN[1DUMCNTPARK]~4Â¢ . ~ 1 i ; 1 1 , r I 0% 1 1 1 5 .Li 1/ A fLES RS'im 1 I I L., UIX 1 ~ ofan ~ ~ g ALLEY 3-2 2 ' 6 --e -.- 5/SETRACK 9 '00"r"" T INN r-- 1 @ 1-1 RAMPON 9 P-VA,liT~ ' - 1--R=r- L--J 1 MT , i --- L ___ _,lke, 01111 1! 1/;71 027Â· -1111 -- ' 41.1 -1- -- 1 - * I= yfr'[1 6 5-3.1 ICIP d ocN [WÂ°-2-91 rÂ·4 1 GLORY HOLE 4, W-or LOSe( CO*OOMINIUMS 13-STORY) f=-1 ~ B.0,2 2.51 1 --M-- 64, f.1 2 L-*L.1 99 99 11 1 1 *R [1=2151 . 1~ Up PEP El OFFICES 4.1 & : . DE.rruâ€¢*111482% 46 ~ -- THE UTTLE t 1 6,7 LOUNGE ABOVE , COAR~OR E NELL HOTEL : 1 1 L RECEPnON -10 14&11&14&2 262 62 '- UIEOF SKY HOTEL 1. 44--dlc' = E [] 19[]IC -GE- --uuJE LODGE'i , 1;12 1 .F UNEN 603 dll- - U . /, - 1 h# 11 1-4, 7 61, PRIVATE 709 E. DURANT AVE. 2~= .- i./ 1 RESIDENCE ASPEN. CO 81611 -- (2-STORY, , -JJI~ 4--f-f fluit OTA-I'J - EVENT Ir=- E-----1 L----I 11 1 | 1 \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \4 \ \ i i/!/4Wkr ALPS ACCESS/DRIVEWAY /1 31 01 hi 4 , O.1 :0 0.42:*~9:~ 4#C ~ -= ~ ''9 a,EcT,0. 21406.60 NÂ¢ ' ASPENALPS V / STORY, BULDING / EWI.-.<-- iag s,EET nO - - / LEVEL 1 FLOOR PLAN 11 M Kalc~-1.:. / PLAN T# NONTH ~JORTH ' an a. 1 - 031 ..1 -Level 1 Plan 1/1.-1 4 f//4 \U \ P02.1 N SCALE lt16' = 1%(r sive'-1.ri-=m V i ~91-43*t gt,Ed 51OEWAiK -6~9 1 9 rowland+broughton 2Me h.ins@ve. 1./.le' stÂ® 200 -pe,% 0081511 -ver -8020. G705440006/ 303.308 1373 0 97054434731 303~06.13751 0..0,â„¢L. ./ 4 2 ReA /0 1 conahm: .â€ž Rb)1 4/Wy 9 1 DRIVETHRU f --- r" 10 #Itille Ir- ----" tw~ +01' SETBACK L _7 A J R , CHATEAU CHATEAU =8~ 19-:Ey=Fit- DUMONT CHAUMONT (3-STIRYI . . STORY, 1.10. /*44 ill I 07.14.2015 DETAILED REVIEW APPUCATION 21 qup' 9 Â© 0 0 r 11 0 9 9 4 8 I Olul Faor--r---l 6 ALLEY 12-r ' 14-0 -- [ UNT -. M.P.-' , 41 J ps k C r=y=Â·< AL- , 3~ ~ ROQF.ELOW Â·L =tn o L]Lug[J]LUCE~ ld'&[j'g-Wai T'Bor'h GLORY HOLE r .'C+EN CONDOMINIUMS ~ '-STIRYJ -1 =.1__c=F'SETRACK THE LITTLE 1 \._FPy NELL HOTEL CORRIDOR C 14-STORY, CEZZ=Z~ZJ IUTtn LOUNG. SKY HOTEL 1 RESIDENC ASPEN, CO 8161 MSET-* fIM@ *Bit (11Â»]Lfirr? 'FOK[j] 311>47[1 Ma]Lq 8. 4<j-~48~ :- i-*=Â·Â·Â·geÂ·*161@~~~: CE' PRIVATE 709 E.DURANT AVE. 9.1, A L.Â£Er/leAREA rd#*MT Â· -- -- !17 -.- - 1 -*-9 644 Â· ..ST-1 1 + rr-- . 6 M 7. r ~5 r 1 /.41"024 hs 13/1 Plk]P=,4,2 W ALPS ACCE 55/DRIVEWAY . a /N: /7 PRCUECT NO 21406.60 44. I V / p . I ASPEN ALPS V BUILDING {2-STORY; Stâ‚¬ETTITLE LEVEL 2 FLOOR PLAN 0 1 1-- *12 SCALE 1/16"â€¢1-0 ~ 6.1 0 El J.74. //4 4-r-' E---_I L-_~ PD2.2 7 /l//lj ROOFBEt-AmE 6*Ed Â£% rl# 0 00 rowlandkrol a.rh*cAn / *'Â¥n /; 23,1 c h.ns,w. 1830 tl*ke Â¤ Stet 200 : '910"081011 d.wÂ« com]02 970.544.34731 3033061375! 91 PRO- .1 n-- RCX F A- 12-7 -3~71 2-Gkjlka-lu I -5.Â£.. *TEL 13 = 1 O 0 14 27/1/ CHATEAU CHATEAU DUMONT CHAUMONT r' Ex-2 r~'Ve' A 0-STORY) I. STORY) 1-le 07.14.2015 DETAILED REVIEW APPUCATION ' 23Â·21/r . 4 V 1 -'I Â£666 DECK i m .0 6100. 1 2 0 3 115@SliMET/~ 1/- , <1 ~ E 81.LE- 0_Iml-1 1 2 , =CJ E . . -/2 1 123 pif UPÂ·SETI'K 0 - . I j /*I.LOW 1 7--RET - [I - ---pa- - lit'..:1 --- ON -~-i-Il'\ V // ELEV Â»:=,9= A El]% 1 GLORY HOLE O 4.9 1= L_k#-13- B' ..STOR~ .0 CONDOMINIUMS I SETBACK | 51 r;11 o ~ DECK 11'Uoll - -U.. THE LITTLE CORm{)OR NELL HOTEL 59.T. DELC 01-STORY' SKY HOTEL 11-- -1 DE r=-7 4 -- -- 1 UMT A U.L LI,rr Â© UNiT | u~T â‚¬,UMT lolt-Jr :.-OF*7 ft *]El & 9 1-3 L "nERFED @ IND U ge D + i S 1 11=g- CEN 1 PRIVATE 709 E. DURANT AVE. 1 RESIDENCE ASPEN. CO 81611 1 DECK 2-STORYI | ROOF BELOW | 1 6 U 0 218 1 1 ALPS ACCESS/DRIVEWAY 4/ / .444\\ ''/,7 X PRCAJECT NO 21Â«JUD 44Â¢, ASPEN ALPS BULDING f2. STOR'O S,EETTIn.E imCb12 LEVEL 3 FLOOR PLAN SCALE 1/le=1'e ~----11 1 JI -I---1 =r-- PD2.3 : 1.1,-PRE790 a SETBACK 23 09Ed rowland+broughton 23~ e hq,*1116 .ve 1=Nakel 'll 200 a,pen co816ll *rlver co80E2 070544*XZO Â®130013730 970544.731 *.308 1375 f k: 1 1.1,1 9 213 # LFI -dirt/ C I *.IS .- /5..TBACK 132 - 244 f eÂ»--4 k-- 27.91,7 . CHATEAU CHATEAU _~Mil- -' NE' f tjM:QOU Wâ€¢Â£24â€ž 23'C W DUMONT CHAUMONT 1 trÂ·-: A r .. I'.sTOR?Vi J-e 0-STO. 1 Sâ‚¬Ckl =Ill iIV jL(X]GE'FRAC]! C 1 07.14.2015 DETAILED 3 6~ Im REVIEW APPLICATION pcÂ». - E 0 2 1 1 81= r k 0 - - "2I %4/I-~M~ ' 1 _ZD: S.BAC* 9 : GOFF 2~JEG'| /7-7.-6 FGARAGE EXHAUST 0.0.rÂ¥.2 9 9. 24 - r.,1 - W.T - 6 Dead /2: 1/ 7.20 9, 9-=-111-21 0 . 11 0%~cr=*1 - -=lemn =T 1.11=21=/ r Ir+-,L==-=--9 1 "ir_ 3Â·112Â·-212- --1 / FE Â·=BELI==ED/17- - LOBBY b pood iN 1--116 [tzli )LI 11Â® -1 9 fia- I I|*~|| rM!#9~ 1, 12 1.W] IFFI ~11 22Â»-Â· I I$,r: CONDOMINIUMS ~ [3-STORY, r --712-5 GLORY HOLE 9 01 ** 1- LODGE,FR~CT oug-ma. ...9 ==0- ,--6'.SETBACK 6. 1 1 =1=11 -1,/ 15!ZFER"IN THE UTTLE 5 CORRIDOR 44 3 ~/ ~Q 1liM Ir,84 -- 5 ~ 0[C tE[3.-c NELL HOTEL (4-STO'RY) SKY HOTEL -i-r-u '0008FRACT. -1 -6.,-10 1 .....2 w CK~*15*1 *'.7 0 Yl 49 0 ...../.2*fill. -3 1 I - -1 - I PRIVATE 709 E.DURANT AVE. 1 RESIDENCE ASPEN, CO 81611 1 DECk 1 0[CK 1 1 -71 1--/-7- 1 0-5TORY, 1 1 TA 4 â€ž - | -0 1 9 0 0 E 1 ~,x~ ALPS ACCESS/DRIVEWAY PROJECTNO 21406.60 X44 V ..STORY ' ASPEN ALPS BUILDING SEETnTLE LEVEL 4 FLOOR PLAN 2 0 Ge-e~,4.44 SCALE 1/16 -1/ < 2 9 .f-NOw-JG 7 PD2.4 : 0 0...0, //5/1,/ / Â» 11 I 224 LgEd Or'Â»40-1 DECK Hi Ner,// I am 4 4 rowland+broi ' 2340. hq*,ns,- 18300!~e*..I, 200 i~en c,>81611 thnÂ·,el.. 80~02 970.....0 30330813730 970,5443~731 301]08.13151 I 1 .* Con'.. Â·71-A.G fuyimi~- TEMP TRANSPARENT 07.14.2015 DETAILE -id*T= 'rAIR: i' - DUMONT CHAUMONT CHATEAU CHATEAU - (3-STORY; (3-STORY) I. .. 2 -1 Mi REVIEW SQUID BARRIER, 18'-0'MAXHGTAFF) ZEZ - - A APPLICAION - POOL 0.'82 - r- IÂ£%15'â€¢ - TEMPTRÂ»ISPAREN | O 22 SOUND BARRIER, - --- 0.0Â·,AUHGTAFF, ELI 6 .0 ~ .t I- 2 u FL *CO ALL= 1 -0.OrNG ~ ~ ' """E.L.Â£15/'TBACK 5 d 44 ===- , ..12 I - 1 r/ECH.KITCIEN h/ .3 - - / FLUES CHNNEY ENCLOSURE 8 ' CI] ii Â·,, Â·, | 77.0* 1 -1! 1 I it 1 4142 9!~~ ~i;tziji~ gt i Mt. 1 1--,0 2 .1 ha. -L i GLORY HOLE --a-/117=\ .%-Wa CONDOMINIUMS A 1 1 1 1 - 1.10Â°0911-i=]llum-H~ 1 61.i - - t=====wei~ ~~~-ir=Â» 5.ACK O-r, 21 ..r L ------ v THE UTTIE 1 1 WH ~ (MWABLE 8'H> COIC I~ifh c= u.ui Li=~~~&Â®lili H NELL HOTEL ..STORY) . uu tr LOUK3' DECK AREA &TJ~~ J % 1 11 p E 1% ,-!!I'il j ARM . ILF--1- :TiF==r/,Al!11 E ==....4 SKY HOTEL ~ ~cr-o~ ~| I~ki Â° ~ ./-2- b S.(rsET~CK PRIVATE 709 E. DZEANT AVE. (2.STORY' 1 RESIDENCE ASPEN, CO 81611 : i.3Â·#ikIEr//ikz=2% . .'. 31,71--/IMIPT D- 11 1 Â· 9 4 + 9 Â¢rl < 19C Al PS ACCESS/ORIVEWAY 4/, ik<:22\: ...'/,2 40 PR(liECT NO 2140660 44 \.../ ~ ' ASPENALPS V BUIDING (2./To~nÂ·J LQi. SIEETTInE ROOF PLAN -| | SCALE: 1/16Â·=14 6~- PD2.5 m '.Age //9 17 flij, X A*WA .Â·05- L.t(N SETBAcK 00 WITH SPRING STAFFT 5/ SETBACK Ls-CK fil EGEd '' ELEVATION ELEVATIONOF ELEVATIONOF hIOST ROOFHEIGHTOVER ACTUALROOFHEIGHT SURVEYOR LABEL A~SHEDORADE NATURALGRACE RESTRICTIVE TOPOGRAM OVER MOST RESTHICTIVE VERIFICATION 1 7947 -7 7/7 -4 PROPOSED 7981'-(r ..10 2 7941 ./ 79~2 -V PROPOSED 7981'J 7942-1 PROPOSED 7981-/ 39-5 4 7941'.I 7947.1 PROPOSED 7981./ 39.5 5 ~38'. 11- 7939-1/ PROPOSED 7WE./ 39-5, 6 79--I 7938Â·.r NATURAL 7978 -7- 7 793.- I 7937Â·107 PROPOSED 7977 - I .5 8 793.- 11- 7939.I PROPOSED 7971.5 33.5' NATURAL m.7 rowland+broughton a,ch*Ue /.ba~ *./ *, des,~ 10 7938'-/ 79.-/ PROPOSED 7978'.y ./ 11 70... 7047-21/4" PROPOSED 7981Â·Â·lr ...Â· 234e~,~s@w 1030 tlal,est ile.200 12 7943-0- 7947-le NATURAL 7973 -5 30 -5 ,Â®~n ~081011 cnver â‚¬08020/ 870544.,0.0 303.306.1373 0 13 7941'.1/ 7943.1 PROPOSED 7g78-7 ..4Â· 970N4.3â€¢731 303.300.13751 14 7941Â·.5 7943.4 PROPOSED M..5 33-I 15 7940-1/ 794~-7- PROPOSED 7973 -5 32 -7 16 . 79â€ž-V NATURAL 7971-. 2.-I 17 7940-1/ 7943'-11- PROPOSED 797e-7- 35.7 18 7943.7 PROPOSED 797~-5 37-4 iaG22-1 ' 7945-11- 7945'-I NATURAL 1975-1 31'. 1 20 7947'.0Â» 7945.3 NATURAL 7973.5- 28.I 21 794.-1/ 7945'-1 NATURAL 7974 -4- . -3 - 1: 794,4/ NATURAL 7gE -7 31Â·-r Con.* 794,-4 NATURAL 1573.9 73.I 24 . 794ng" Wit 708'.7- 37.107 E71 ==L I . 7@E.. NATURAL 7881'-11- ... ILl- 1 26 78â‚¬.. 7943.11- NATURAL â„¢3-9' ... 27 794"-5 NATIAL 7981-le ..5- 28 7943-4 NATURAL 7987-I .-8 7943-le NATURAL 7983./ 30-11' 30 7843-11- NATURAL 7881-,CÂ» f 8--'. NATURAL 7982-3. .1. 32 793~-6 NATURAL 78-7Â» ..1 k=EZEL-_-1 2 79,Z./ NA~URAL 7981.I ..7 m43 - I NArURAL /971'- 10 ... ' .i-/ECH KITCHEN 19"Je FLUEs c,IMNEY 07.14.2015 DETAILED i FIREPLACEFLUE' .POINT FROM .ELEVATOR OVERRUN rFIREPLACE fLUE REVIEW / APPUCATION GABANAS BEYOND'EMP/MOVABLE I ' 1-VETORIDGE/ r--V)POINT FROM E 8 --p--1 --I- GLASS // EAVE TO RIDGE I .POINTFROM z~~zzzz:za =-=,2 1- 1 *LACEFLUE EAVETORIDGE-r,. rFIREPLACEFLUE /12 POINT FROM 'le- 14-1-JEL___1 2bbl z._MDGDd ' I rio CONC. DECK iL - +--~talk IMEL._ -0 - ...a L.Litil Ultil Nrm-~Â·Mt*rrr~m~ ./ . 131.-e = , :1. ,.-A.iNE././:Ah#,Fil - - #- --- -f31 -_1418-9 â€ž 04=,Get.m -rl, : ~ i. rilll f lilli 9 I W.Il-4% I I ,Â·1Â·11! 111 - mul mw Bm op AESHEEEN rA - -Â»-76.1.- .1 - - - _-Â¥1 -___-- -Ll-_1_Ul-*a~f- 16 31-3*1Â©4444#B B_ 1 Â· 1 +IT - _ . 1 0:4 4 112. 17 1 1 , m -1 1 1\) AEIF- : ~ ~ ~,fl.} ~ i .41 9Â·-lff-~ ~;"11 42~ l - fluD .Elm~ fIEI t]~~ 2,-Ea--2- L--! e J-; c~~ ~f#F~~ m - : tÂ·erâ‚¬ - -- . A~=I , j et< ' 4/&-4,- _i~_- -~ __~4 . , -' =ti~*/11 Ill *11= r g'-. r 'ri 11 78 om Wiet-m-Â·,4~: :' : 31 99 m 99 -4 p? '' ' I mril--gÂ·Z~ -741- 1 J J . 7.0 b W -11. 4 ..J 0.-------1 ------------Ci' P 11,255EDPAMIC]'2-u-1 eE.<0Â»11104 DRM -THR. TO CONC Ir/Ell p 9./. BEYONDALLE'/ELEVATION FOREGROUND ELEVATION ALLEY (NORTH ELEVATION) DURANT AVE. (NORTH ELEVATION) SIC( HOTEL < 1 j NORTH EXTERIOR ELEVATION i PDA.1 / SCALE y,Z= 1'2 709 E. DURANT AVE. ~ g ~ ASPEN, CO 81611 ~DORMER IS i EXCLUDEDER)41 . HEIGHt ~ ~,n POINTFROU rTO 001Â£.DECK rv2POINTFI?OM ,DORMERIS ' I A ....IONS-7 i ..10..9 / ;' EAVETORIDGE / EXCLUDED FROM 6 ~- 1 './. 3 / MEIGHT CALCUtATIONS / i F--n-7-- /0(458@~DRAIL r-Kw ' . I J j .L ~~q~ _ 3_ - -~ r r . 13// â€¢4-0Â®31F~-1 F.Mil,7,F-~a m,7171231393 TO. CONC. 11 m ..1 -igth,-Th i-,7 1 - -91=M=*-1 111 afl E.,1 2140660 PRaIECTND I z=~lilili TO.Â£ 1 1 E ? 0 3 El'*EE-=:-Rm -,Fi~'1Ng - -REL-: Miz=~-_ -=4-1- 'IniZ~ -_-_-_-_-_ LF,â‚¬L. 1 .I I - 11 = f- H. . . : 3 imr,7-1- 6 Il P f ~Â·l~Li LEVELQPATIOARTL '..14 d TO CONC i SHEET nTLE -~Ittl-i~2Â·LlÂ·' -:2Â· 2-11ft I r ~~. - - .- -___ _ .p~_- 3,~-9 | ELEVATIONS mih ; ,-7.11â‚¬Â·tr- . f' 1, L 1 ' k' 1 PROPOSED EXTERIOR T.O. CONC. J - ' -0.- 7 - 4 1 ~ SCALE As indiatec < glfl -=- 7--.23--RB-Ab %0 9 1 L.IL 1 0* _ 9 at#.1 1 PD4.1 : 7941'. V W. 7 1 , -441 -~----------------- MAIN ENTRY CARAGE ENTRY b ~STEXTERIORELEVATEL fP[4.1~/ SCALE 132Â»â€¢ 1Â·4 ELEVATION ELEVATIONOF ELEVATIONOF MOST ROOF HEIGHI OVER ACTUAL ROOF HEK]HT SAWIVEN'. lABEL Fl,~SIÂ·â‚¬[GRADE W,TURkGRADE BTNE -1[POGW,tl OVE:RDAS'RESâ„¢Câ„¢E < 1 7947-2 7943-4 PROPOSED 7901'-I 2 7941'Â·I 7@47Â·1 PROPOSED 7981'-I .-1/ 794'... 7942-r PROPOSED -~ " rl; 7941'.6 79'17-1 PROPOSED 7981'-I ... 5 7938'.1/ 793g.,tr PROPOSED 79.- I ..r 6 793... 7HN..8 NATURAL 7WS -7 7 7193#.7 ~37Â·. PROPOSED 7977-7 30-9 8 7937'-11 793~Â·6Â· PROPOSED 7971'-5 .-I 9 - 7/0. 107 W.TURAL 797~.I 30.7 rowland+broi 10 7838'-I M. PROPOSED 7gle-7 .-11Â· a,ch,Â»ctwe/,bandase.i 11 7947Â· I 7942Â·21. PROPOSED 7Mr-11Â· .- 1,Â· 234 e I,cp)~ ~ve 1030 El- M. - 200 12 7943 - I 7917Â·10' NATURAL 7973 - y .-5 ==2 Inve,Go 80202 13 7911'.1/ 79.Â· 1 PROPOSED 7976-/ 364 970.544.34?31 30130813751 14 7911'.5' 7./.4 PROPOSED m..9 33-I 15 7./.1/ 7943Â·r PROPOSED %-/ 37-r 16 - 794Â·r-I NAT~RAL 7971'-100 27- I 17 79Â«7-1/ 79(y-lr PROPOSED 787g-I 3.- S. 18 7.42.7 79â€ž.4. PROPOSED 797~.I Malimtillifirm 8 is,e.ie 7915Â·Â·I ,~IURAL 79Ug.I 31Â·Â· 1~ 20 794.- I 7945Â·. r N.. mÂ·/ 26Â·2Â· 21 79'...1/ 79,9-1 NITURAL 797~-" 20-r Con#. 22 79.-I 79~r-11' NtTURAL 79*7-7 31'-r 23 794.-I 7944.4 NATURAL 7973-5 29- 1 - 7343-7 NATURAL 7981-7' 37.. 25 79.- 17 7044. r NATURAL 7981'-lr 37'. 10- 26 79*V-le 7ge.11Â· NATAAL 790-ir .-10. 27 - 7943-5 NATURAL 7981'- 1(7 2 - 9 28 - 79..4 NATUR,~ =.I ..8 29 - 7843-1[ NATURAL 7983-/ ... 30 - 7,43Â·11' NATURAL 7001'.1(7 .Â·11* 31 - 7947 - 1[r NATURAL m.l ..5 32 - 7,30-e lul 707,-I ..1 .DS L.1 - u - 7943 - e NATURAL 7981'.7- 39-I 34 - 7/7.6 ~TlmAL 7971- . 25.e - 1 rll: POâ€¢T FROM â€¢ Â· 07.14.2015 DETAILED FIREPLACE FLUE-~ EAVE TO RIDGE *PLACE'UE--2 ' REVIEW 10 POIN[ F.. 1 Al/POINTFROM ~ APPLICATION ,~POINTFROM ...TEROM TRELLIS -fTE~P~OVA~k96,9/ g FIREPLACEFLUE / EAVETORIDGE-~ TA CONC -2 =76-444/ , p 4 ROCE .CK' il.1,7. ) - 0,/~Jf ' .- 1 - g 10. CONC. O. All'Li |..;:#IM .'T 1, 204- - 0,1 15'MFar.m.. 7= 4 , 4-6. 1 1 -/I Â·Â·Â·. , 11 131* I 5:- -_31 - 16* lim ~Â¥=4444}Pm *1-f -4~=T - . .1 -NAP .L# 121-3' I _Lil_ 1 -'im :, i:.:Il.Â·limE *1 Z 'I =Il# E=! 1 4 3*,c 1,9/ : :. 1 4 t, 2 2A ~1 L-99-1 1- 1-.ZE--1 --- ~f ,. . ., i ~ ' I ' Fl-*I'll' ' I , T.O. CONC. :3 2.p , =22 4. T:-71 1, i i ag- LE= f ... --ff -,171 971 71!-1 -- *1[3 - Elm g]71 1 711 Â· 81[" r Fll mi m-1 17 1 1 < T.0 CON. TO Col,IC . I 'F.1 1. LEVELI 5 , 'f 1./7 ASPEN ALPS ACCESSDRIVEWAY (SOUTH ELEVATION) ~ SOUTH EXTERIOR ELEVATION 23/ SCALE 302Â· = 1Â·-{r SKY HOTEL % 2 ' C 1 1 1 709 E. DURANT AVE. 1"PLACE FLUE 4 ASPEN, CO 81611 GENERATOREXHAUST/ TRELUS BEYOND /7 ELEVATORO~ERRLÂ»I ,/ECH aAS.... / - "- .FIREPLACEFLUE - T O GONG RooF OFC< F 4 Â· . 2Â»4-- _ - ROOFDECKA , 41 TO CONC. W. ,. 4 9 1 1 - S : 137.2 - 1 TO. CONC ./ Ar",7/.*1 EL . WW 1/7//72-=~py-LIN1rlilla- I "~121. 1- ,- till,iÂ£ T.&12& , 441:# M.' m - 128-Â¢ ' PR~ECTIO -/IN.# . & T.&0 4 '. t 21406.. 1 0 CONQ 1 A 4]Rnmm.mm#1 8181- 9~1 _110- IC= L.&10 $ h SHEET TITLE 12 .1 rf?mfc=... m---- PROPOSED EXTERIOR . mi~ E - Cl EB ELLEVATIONS T&*Mi ' FOREGROUNDELEVA# p . . SCALE: As indicated Bef,Â©ALLEYELEVATION ORIGINAL STREET (EAST ELEVATION) PD4.2 EAST EXTERIOR ELEVATION SCAtE 3!37 = 1'. i ...313*312 vnÂ·.IPâ„¢,1*r~t- fgal 9.9. , 9.3 r . 4 ?tte -....... =AtiÂ· 1 .b /&4' < 0 6* K 4,/4635 09:2 y.+4 ....- ..'AL 1 .â€¢ . , .12Â« ..7': JI - Alir '.t# Â«42* 1 t- Â¢284.- W.-''. '*.: x i.. ... a ' 1,): -4 i 24 - 1 92% ~ L. d-E--m=--m-*Veu~ . L I /Â£/pill I iÂ¥,ry&, . rn .r -~ t--Ste f 4- =14= 2..4,2- 4.,fleâ€¢~~ Â·-. -_4-0 ..,NÂ£1* -41Â£&, , f ' Â·,i' L-f 'al - .--igg~.23â‚¬/ir <1%1 4 4 -- , ...,Fl 3Â»et .. 424: 9 //'w - 1 .â‚¬ 9 k A-- A 8-, ...42*111(*Allilf 8 19/09-t . 1- 9 - 11,1 mill.: ..4. I ./ IM % - - --7.2"22 - 5...2,-,~~ % 0 1~~ - 11 -'1 K .-3 * "'* â‚¬ ~~ 441Â·47"WAM/.6 - 5Â¥ . te*L Ta-#igit fet'fli~.2 426.43 4 *Â·2 - 1/215'"7 6. 'ei- 7/2 ., *- i. .+ /24-23,-'' . ; i# ri = 12 *1 4/ . 2 e 1,13Â·, 1 $. p&-/ 9 44: M.*21 WA * ~<~.~v-25': QIâ‚¬-- 8 + W . D. $. I. . INTERPOLATED SITE TOPOGRAPHY SKY HOTEL 21-i -._) .f*Â·--*--~~ 149 Â·8 I .- , / / / I % Z -- / - _7936- ~ -- /7030' 9% ' , .1939Â£ ---7940-- / 1 /. es \ ./ f 1 2 --*==-tia*7.-7_7 -+ / 1 1 A -1 ,r \KIL/ 1 1 1. 1 1- 9..1 i 70,3 1 74/ f r / \\ f / ..4-7 .1 2../ ff-- J/644 / <Â·f /1 1 + 1 J 0 I // 1 D , % n====A i .t '\\\ I. I 'r-nIf /\ Arrr--1 .(i f 4l /-~i O /1' )11\\\-1/\\\\4464 14_3 f UÂ»-Li,84< 7213"=:=cinl~lrhill'[1 ' 12 ' k 1.1 1 1 :/1 - 1 1,2,4/ 1 1 0\ \ 1# / 11114-T = 0 3/ ...4 // / 10 1 .1 1, 11 6 / 94 _,J~Â£ 11 ~Â» C:'t.-L FL~J=.L Â· J Â· Tr=M / 1 1 Il~Illl 11 1, 1 1 /1 GRAPHIC SCALE / 4- / 6 // . 1 .NZAL / 0 /2 / // i {INFEET) 1./= 20 I LU_____1_1-21___2_2 4-\ L~- 1 1 1 JL i l I ' : . - 1 e l' / Â»7' ' 4 0 7 16 -1 I 1-- 79-9-1 -t--EL-UF- f 1~ 1 /2 6PRis ENGINEERING- LLC CIVIL CONSULTANTS 502 MAIN STREET, SUITE A3 â€¢r [1 *rMD~G~0,0LC~ADOL-'.ruw,NniN,LL~L CARBONDALE, COLORADO 81623/ .i-'Al"'A." (970) 704-0311 SOPRISENG@SOPRISEN~ e= DURANT STREET LEGEND -- -- PROPERTY UNE rowland +broughton a,0*Ii,re / *i? dÂ£5~Qn / interfor de5/i 234e~01*.m .30.'Ill &:E aspen Â¢0 916tl denve, c. 8020. \\\\ 970.-*60 203.]06.1373 c NOTES ,/p./.f 3034//1 1. LAYOUT DIMENS[ONS ARE FROM THE BACK OF CURB UNLESS OTHERWISE STATED. 2. REFER TO C./DRAWINGS FOR ALL EASEMENTS - 1 j 7-PROPERr~ Uity- AND SETBACKS Con&ul~in' bluegreen 300 s .... i/[e 2/ CHATEAU A>M. co 016/ 9/0429.7499: www.bluegreen@spen.coir 970,429,9499 ' DUMONT I - h Li j_J -7~2-2 ~'1 , ' i ~sue: 07.14.15 PLANNED DFVELOPMENT DETAILEDREVIEWAPPUCAnON -1[ 4 10 1 1 : :i) HJ U V~o~ 0 151_Ims%-El--- 1 ~_ -- U_) 1 ALLEY PROPERTY UNE l[_.i _~. ~. ~ _ PLANTER _-~I M]_-322._4,4 1 9Â»1 0 T 1 GLORYHOLE A FL 1 ti CONDOMINIUMS 8 L.: 4 u *1 'Â« e ---f L L n F- 1 n j If=-- L-1 r 3 1 1 - - 1 1- J L u SKY HOTEL - -1/1 7 -1 rcr-* -. r-0-1 - r-un,- r-07 -.-1.-Il - 1 - 709 E, DURANT AVENUE -hz/z.. 1 3 I '1 ' ASPEN, 00 81611 ~-,UL- PRIVATE RESIDENCE & - --M k. 1 : f Hj' 1 i L SL~ EXISTING'~LPS PAAING 4, \ ' \ p/PERTY /4 \ / ! f.- \ 27 ': 10' - Xk\~A 32Â¢Â« 1// 1. NORT+ I. -XV.\<F. // 4// r.....U- .--9--- --- - PROJECTN04 2140G Â· - SERIES SKY HOTEL.dig h f ASPEN ALPS CONDOMINIUMS : , STREET LEVEL . J , UYOUT PLAN i ' L_r m SCALE ~< 7- A i ----- 1 - -1 -- - -1 L200 - / 0 / b / T= 1 i PRELIMINARY ~ NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION ~ ' G.21' 4. 961 \ \ 8 -S~i' r "px'ADA-P ' / SITE IMPROVEMENTS LEGEND RCU~B, 7- 3/ r'Â°Â· / :~A Â» Â·. 2 Nr- .ISTINGEASEMENT -7 <p *~ 3Â·6 .' f~ APP=%'#15 K *,--. -* \--- .16â„¢GPACPERTYLDE f 1 1 -271 1 - OD - PROPOSE.......J~ Z ~ _, - ~i~ - 6'SETBACKh . BARRIERCURB& - GUTTER ./A Â»4333>J \93 - '.....STORMSEWER - ..PROPOSPO \~'/'flr'Â¢â€¢ Â·''~' ' ~~f- 0 " . i Â»49'NUE N 1 : 5717 ,&d"42'.B A ' 2/13,.1 .A 7. 4.11:%,1.,'.-- *. - \â€ž :.i~>.4.9.-R-\\ll.,3-'.2: t '4~ ..1 1 # - 2~~44~~~~~r-TZ - 4 9 : 1/,74Â« .4.- 1 PROPOSEDCONCITErAVEUENT i--*3-Â·.3*.imi PROPISED..EABLEPAVERS 1 8 ~900" H f # 0:..krab....Â».u. <p~Â°pâ„¢Â° ~Â°* - PRO~OSEC~-40 2 - r 5101.-Im} 3-CCÂ»=k-- 18~MIDEP9*.==. ~RÂ¥-lÂ·.,.Â·:,- 1 : r ./4 I ./ I. I A . 1.BIEGI~Â£1'EA~ME. 2 11. ~ORC-(AttAUC~W~k~WT 3 2 -Â· 'ROPOS.DPUaLIC . PLN PLAI --T<7-4/- ; d\; Â·' & Ipl 31[i 4-Â·- hNouriu,i,Aa.w - . -MWÂ· Â· Â·Â·-Â· - 'â€ž.- FROOE,nUNE -. 1 01, 11 11 F :,Al .1, SEAVICEEN,RANCE - / u 7 I ..Â·U- 1-1 ' lrWIDE'All/E M Z G 3.. -' Â· ' iÂ· -/.-Â·Â·Â·. 02'[UM.Nt W I . f pEDLSIR 1-6-~.4. Al CORHICOR ~1.RiDLANI)Â§CAp. AA.A 4 0- g E :al CH47EAU DUMONT " I. Â· - i' ~_ FO.*UT, , f - 0. .2/ M i . 82 '.Â· '/El'll. 2 Z -:-2 1 1 t C .1 i 1 - 91%&*26. 1 240 - L.18 :%8 -- .K i "19'ALL/46'751'1*[,11 , f~" ; , x.:ItT~'iEAE,i* 1 2 i cHAT ***NG 1. pÂ· - ., ' ~ ....T / 0 #W~i., ...Â· .. Â· Â· 1 0- . 01Â·Â·Â·.<Â·â€¢Â·Â·LI Â·â€¢6E~lit I il li k;m- ... , 1 ' EAU CHAUMONT , ..... . ...-'.%' Â·Â·,ah-....Aul:.AIRINIAJ. 1 / / 1 ~ * v :--. f,9. 1... 11 ! nw<i- 5---- --- 1 PICkull KNIKG& , Â¥40Â§[MCEAR[A L- S 3- ' '1~ 3.; !=3444 4 14 ... 2.. :; r SKY HOTEL i. ./11 tor Â· 120 < r. 1111 - 1.. .'f: $ \ 7 11 1-1 D.0.7Â«81 .1 9.Â·. . *=ONIND.U. ~ GAAG{ACCE~ PEOLSIHIAN , , 1/=/.5] L LIM~o tO 10Â· CA06SING ' . LANDS(AP[PLANMFOMROOFTOP I LAN.(Â»1./.AL wmeâ€¢4/i@Al PRDPOSED . 4 'A - 11' I.AD ADARAMP 5ECOND'.OOH \\ / 1 G IA[PERIOARâ‚¬HIT~OURA. f<\ / L.SC*'PlA.~011$[COND GLORY HOLE T (*]R rk.U 1,1.OVâ„¢ENTS) , PROPOIDCUMB /4 4 J CONDOMiNIUMS I .* 92\Â« AL~PW *'43-41 -,2 0 1 / I // 4tCUR~~~T~;-Ocum.,,Â·a, \ ..1. . I N-tz. ..... ... -1 -\ :,) #Â«lr ...- ~ / 11 1 . ,**j /,<*â€ž79, -- --073<1. *245~k~1~22... 7*... / 7 1 . 0. ADA RAMP 12 CENTERUNE~f1200~ADE EA541.~TAGG~[EMENTFOR CEN'QUNE011./i;E,~Sa~r .71<Q-'.--% 11..... I., 1. 9- r-, 9 D n. / PRIATEaOADWAY//GRE...55 .SNE.~ENT 1011 p.1.rAI ' L GRANI.... ROAaAÂ¥.GAL....GRAN[[OB' -- --'ll- -1 % 2 , 4 1 ' - $ tl 4 1 .r 1. 1 2 2: I 'iÂ· 1 1.Â· Â·- i i , 2114 M - , A U903<-h /\ IUS.0~0~WRR /N 4 W. f 1 i V / j Z Al,&-*/*9~11'/0 APEN A;25 OUNEI. NS' * -91.2690/.- .- 44-giL --- 11 16'4*wj"L~; 7 INOW"HOT. ~~ ~ GUPHICSCALE Z ' "w' li M.I[./&1~Â¥MOT[ , )-- N ~.â„¢ \ J f).31 / UK.32%. 777 :--,a- ...VENULP[DEST.ANCORRIOnl T # a \12 / 7 , LU ASPEN AIPS BUU,DING 100 1 4 :4 41Jl--\ -1 F.-9-9-- (INFEET) 2 :\ / ASPEN ALPS ----2-47&.E4-- m --1 PX-43'fi 1 nci = 20 IL (100 BLDI 3 -L -7 a. . -- 7-h - -3 to f PLAT BK. ZA PG. 304-308 5 .--- -7 -Â·27 0 Knowwhat'sbelow, DATE: -14-15 Callbef JOBNO. 14040 C~ i 2-LS~*SS BER];E 01 ~[1 C SHEET Cl IWI' NOI JAHiGNOO AS 0 >0910 Â· 011'9N ABC'aNDISBO V N na'3 602 Â£ l/7/LE /24 HOTEL 13=dhiLS N I A NOIS'/3~ 1N3IAIdO13A3(]3hI 131OH AMS NOLLVOInddV M3IA323 0311'V130 1N31NdO-13A30 03NNVÂ·Id 0: --m-=H?%.27 /294? l EXISTING & PROPOSED LEGEND to EXISTINGCO4~OJA - EkISTING.04-Oual,ITERV. 25 ~ - rn - EXISTING WATER.IN Z Â·V -.â€¢ - EXISTING SA'-ARY SEWERMAIN 6*16'INGELEC -ELE CABLE.GAS - 4 - 4 ,- 7 u- ' 9--i - Â·- - fâ€¢ - E*ls-Ill(3 ELEC TELE CABLE ------ - i Â·~ " ~ Â· - EÂ»STING TEEPHONE -,1 - - v. - EXISTiNG LNDERGROU. ELEC-AIC . '-- EXISTNGOVER~EADEL ECUMS -r i r ~ u - EXIS-:43 CABLE EXIST,46,1.MOPTS ---.i- EkISTINGIRRIGATIONPIPE i '7 --i - - E*,51!IGGTORMSEWER 2 5.1.N -/ *.*- *.-. - I , 'ACPERâ„¢UNE 'f; AISTING ELECTRIC.AE & I MATCIâ€¢ '7938. . 0 .511NG.AINAGE OR. WELL 0.-I ' 3,2 6, EXISTI........ I M ,~811 SCREâ‚¬k WA.. \ I.., 0% EXISTI..........0/ 0/ * TTOEXCEED' ~ EAIST'kIG LTRJâ„¢ MA.. 3 I 3 1. 1 'F. 4 ~i,â€žINSE,BACK J .!39..E p'.. Wi~SCAF[AR[A -0(19*. 4 - - .C EXIS-IND~VATE.* ~~IlC ll _ I Z.k-*) -. -%- - I -- ff EXISTI40 CLA8 STÂ¢X' 11 i/fl,1/ *69 -i. 7 - A M EXISTING GAS METER ~ Ff[ 7338.0 --% (Ir E EXISTINGELECTRICIAANSCORMER ~1-793@731\ J .9:. /L /If - I Els...LECTAIME-ER - - -N.-I-- -- 21 .I.....45 PEDESTAL ; m % 4 1 Il a 1,1.11" 11- i x: -.? Â· 11lt' i m I E........St/ < GL: tr:Nt..2.-20:~le=ff 'J k 8 .il.......T 5 1 R . E.TI. ST..1// EIS-INO 510.4 4 Z Â·. - /APPRO~MATELIMM 1 /frA ~'.7Â·/,iÂ·--: #. i ' TOBEDETERMINED U /0/>2 CIKEAU DUMONT C. OKASPEN OROPOSEDCONTOUR 62 > 3 'L 911.1.L"D. L 1,~RED~ANOSCAJEAREA~OR i Ii 8 U 1 1 ..:,446< 1 - uo - in - PROPOSEC ELEC TELE CABLE FeA 1 - 1 ~ 4 *Ari/*BIEN -- - - PROPOSEOSTCA~SEâ€¢a (4 - Â¥Â·t ~SLÂ·:.r "1 '~RC2] . '2 1. - loc-,9Â«}sr 741 F! 3 Â· ,-NA 1 J , - -- -9, - PAC)POSEDGAS - -i - â€¢- Pe'OSED mHO'JE F 47 /J . + g I - PliPOSEDJNDERGROUNDELECTRIC I I li , 1 111 B m,seDS-ORâ€¢,ET '4 4 44Â£ L...~e j ~ / / - -Â· - - 21;OPC)SED@IBE9OÂ°liC -OC 7/] lir ' .1 :p.. .-..- -1111 -- ' 1 -!01 - PROPOSEOW.OFOIST.'INCE f //1 /1 1 i .2 ~ 11 . it,:&.FlatÂ·Â· ' . Â· . PROPOSED.SPHALTPAVEMENT 1 '/ ,/- Â· 4 -/ / /91 , f Wr~ 6%ARk WND!61Â·,ISSHEET 1 -oc,/:' ' 'Â·.'Â·i~E'%2Â·,itiÂ·:9 .05. PE~.EABLE$'AVEAS 49-,'~. .ff ./' if~lff ~4 SKY HOTEL 709 E. DURAM A lOT: 41,336 W 4 N - - 0 4 I.:79&192 Z PROPOSEOLANDSCAI'ING ~794322 r, 4-Â«. 5 4- ....2,4. mE:7TH )- 102794240 .*4114.:-1-40 7 - Â«79/9, AUTAI,~. WAÂ£.10kUU m 79~0.31 , ...47.' -oc 794C 77 TOC-Jb3 , f ' 1 .... - I:' 1 I 10C 7940/~ ~794081'/ 7 : -'..-4453 t'' // 444 lu: 9 ... rot~N~EAFOR wATEHQUAL,r, TAWMEN, 1, 4 4 / ./,7. '*% 35. 4 CURBCUT'794. 10~)1' %4 L) g Torn.312 ~loc,9,8, Uf.Lit/1- . T,EREDLANek/)LAU 91 41 5 1 \/ 4 0 - 3 Af 1-4.5 4 -I .- -4 *=1 /1 3 .> /1 -Â· INTÂ¢P Ex *3,4 0. 1 % . â‚¬ 'r- -. 'hÂ·u,_ LI--72-'F-7) - S -tfu c. /- : 2*T 4. #'4.-- - Z - 4~ _ 1~ fy:@ -Â· GRAPHIC 5CALE /, el,â‚¬>-- .-, at L- / 262,256'21466661 1 <O 1/ \: t .2 4 f,1//14,>t '4 1 \ / 1, //It 1/ FEETI rf,04 / .,M .4 L 1 nci = 20 ft SPOT ELEVATION LEGEND SITE BENCHMARK ASPEN ALPS BUILDING 100 I \\ RA~~QO[[IEVATiON AN .....791195'INA..1988)ON THE W . 801%=80-TOMOFWALL D=EDGEOFASP-IALT Ng:12:32=751==*S : CD EX=E]OST&1~ ONâ„¢knREaRAND j ~PlASTÂ«APSTAMPULb #16]a . Z FFE=FINISMEDF-OCREEVA-1. MONUMEIAN..EPOiN-IN THE EAVER.Â¥BDUNDUY LINE, A~ C] 5.*HEREON FG = Fl/SRED GAA' 5 FL=FLOWLIE 11'=Hoh PINT (777 0 LP=LOWPOINT MATCH EX = MATCH EXIS~ING 0.11 . = Rld ELEVAT,ON TS: â€¢ 7.BACK OFC!.RB TCC=-OPOCCONCRETE Knowwhal'sbeloW. DRAINAGE [~RECTUIM AL Cal|before you dig. 1-/-"K lk.. 0,4 2-MM~ DA~ IÂ». DATE Â·Â·4.15 SPI/&// 7 .,-Toc790000 9&%/Uhre,Z,WW EXUIPLETOP/CONCRETE@1900... .r ID,GEÂ» un~Tis JOB No. -4049 SHEET 62 NOIDAMiSNOO 400 alvC /7/1 ilhl ~UDll '9Nlk]33 NI 1NBINdO-13A30321 131OH AMS CLUM:0*' NOILVOilddv AA3IA3M 03nlv13a 1N3INd013A30 (]ANNV VI.A. FHE L.IrTLE NEI P259 --ti :/ ---' CZEL_: /1 2 5 ' - - '' ' CONCEPTUAL POST DEVELOPMENT ONSITE PEAK RUNOFF RATES: Pit â€¢ r----- 6, * % - UÂ» /3 0 0 - - rix'.--I/-1-7-Kir7-El r-Wn-iT77-227-li/'-1 z DURANTAVENUE - L 10 1 1 {in/hi I i.crei ids, I i ID I kin/bri 1 1-1 1 16 r -:Il Il ' 37 2 , i 1 I 040 I 37; I 0 033 I 0048 I : 1 1 052 I 632 I 0.033 I Olou 1 2 1 086 I 372 1 - 03.--8-i/ L_3 1 091 1 6,32 1 0053 1 030' 1 'SRCÂ·1 lOCAnDWITHIN.ANDSC~ING ' M' I' W' - L 3 E 016 1 6.32 1 0(m 1 0033 J /~ MEA.m'WA-iRQUAL. I. | 4 T 058 |632 1 DOM T Ola 1 D U5â‚¬OP~[E 15~181EXâ€¢toREDI~ ' :- '. .. i.LCAL PR0P06E{,INLETANDWOAM 0102 1 0 255 5 | 074 1 632 1 o toi--rEirl /7 *FNI'ED,1 -4... . Â»m i PlPEGIZâ‚¬7%0NFIRMED ' ' P~(POSEDINA.h. / k 7 r PR!ORTO RUNDINGP(- ~ I 6 |057|3721--ing '/3 [ 6 T-62--TijiT--LiE-T-url -: UTOS'tQNFLIIMÂ£p / 5u"inAL - ~ L'-r.'-DVT-----a--3--ai-1 7 | 072 1 6.32 | COM-6-i' E PROR TO BU//*Â¢.. ./. Â®61,11. \ -==-4-=====-======-=--===================== ~ L_i_ 1 079 [-62 |01@~~T-YÂ£=-1 Il/ 1 (/75 1 372 1 0087 1 0242 I LE 1 0,81 1 6.32 1 0 087 4 0444 | m 1 0.74 1 632 1 0099 0461-1 I 1 074 1 172 1 0677 7-BiiT-1 1 to 1 0/Ti'/ -6-8.-7-'*--1 1 069 I 372 I 0072 ' 0186 1 1 11 1 075 1 6,i-1 06r-1--iii-1 i L 1 1 0.92 1 in [ 02-7-ibir-I 1 12 1--6*-1-ijiT--3~-1--82-1 - .-- i [ DI liET-iii-1--62--7--8ifii-1 | 13 1 0.52 | 632 | 0001-0,/3 '' ' ~ 12 .-a-T--TE-T-=..'mil1 | 14 | 072 1-alcoaom Â»4% 44?11# 11,~ Z . ~V" ~ i | 15 | 0.61 | 372 | 004--TiliEL| L=a__L_&*ZI**IZE**LZE#*L] o ----1 4~.~.94*~,~ON; :f ..r---i-7.-7 ...3~1...1.-j.1- 41 CHATEAU DUMONT CHATEAU CHAUMONT grO,C, CUD . 9%01<1 ENCEPTUALWATERQUNILIEATMENTSUMMARYTABLE 1 44/ 4/ 19 8 %" 1 1 1 L.L. 1./.Ll-LI...._.....L_1-3. TREATMENT LOCAnoN . - - -- -I ~&5Ah/~R=T 2 . IRCÂ·1 | 4 1.1-m/-3/.'/6/"Ill".FI'll. 1 964 4 1 L___L_-__L_-L_.....1~ ~i |1 -21 5 1-1 ./ 0 185 69 LAND5CAPING ALONG EAST'BET.E-1 4,\,\ 5 : S . 4 l.=:.2-, ..0.1 '4 1 Bll-CZE*ZEZILLLj*EndnEZ~ i UELL--=ML-_4-JEL,1-aa_4__-_CIL_-_L-.2__1_1892EINGMEAMMILIPPAID 1 3. 141 Â·MA Â·'111 : 2~ 2 . AÂ¥ 1 Â· 1 kELLÂ©_11-21,9-85%_01%L-1--/LANDÂ¥8Â£!NGARMM,IDEALEMBE:,6 1 BRO 61 15 1 2092_L 78% ! 0160 1 28 1/NICAPINGAREAWITOFAL'/ARKINGI 3 1,1 AC /9: ' F- El '-a, 7\191. 6;V,UNCE,GROUND.ND:ILTiR 7 4.21 .~â€¢.Â£'.1 | Â£ '.-tINI2 | -7- 1 ~ -~~1%. 01 ="1==ONVT'%~,Q EliILLOLLIÂ»ELÂ»*222222Â£}*EZEEinl.....~...... *1â„¢1"PA*KI~12O)4 V : 9. '|il. IT,MATEDDIMENION I F-E-[26.Mi72[-2X7-V-f-------'A..7WiiEE-n---*6"' M 1, " - 14. 8AgNS S.F. IMPERV DEPTH(in) 1 0) TREATMENTICAION 1 - EUTEZZE./cll-/.....'I'.......1 X, ~ . 9 ~4~'' I â€žSIN #. 1Â·#'r-. .:1~ .._ .L ._,. - tio,(~.1,~1./.Al-EL: 4- . 73>.>C... .J-- ...2. . GiGEORI/TiE-K/A-x-wl/nia*IpAMDsED g J .6 -,3 1 ~ / Â©14_MEL_.L*2Emt_REEL_U!1.-4__2!MELE!~ 1 i s..1 i 6 , 5205 74% 1 015 1 1/fLOWGRADEINALLIAL....51.EOFI 4 91 1 .; 203 *4 1 1 1 UELUL__-1-4-a-Li-L_=iL__1.-141&22Â£Ei****iii**] 1, 6 2 fl i - GLORY HOLE 1 1 I.'/:-Il_I._9.EL____L_lillie.8..........2 1 1 1 , 98 Ln LE_ --~ CONDOMINIUMS i,i , rl~JL - - --7 ST%MWATER.1/JATIONOESIGNILLUSTRATEOHER-!SC....AL. S0*G 'OCAT/4 1 .....8.-A.le 1 , i]BE,Dl,RAN[Aft ~ P "~ 42, 265 PROPOSED LEGEND r -- CONF-EWINA~ED PRIO;+ TO BLLiNH<1PERUIT *JK~TDi RA51N #9U 11 6 1 * 2,9 1 BASIM WATERQUA.,rr *~WiNT i E I FOR BAS,6 . r!BRED I ..OPOS. CO'OUR MXQUMC]WE GUDE .00- I.OPOSED..4-OURINTERVAL 1 1 'FFEQENÂ·/ I.>POSEDFLOWARRI A L I -1_ ~~ -0_f. /.9--- i. 1, ----- POSTOJEVELIPME.CR-U.IN '1 1 , ~94& I -* A- m- =1* PROPOSEDS-CRUSEWER ...:1- :.1... 1 - ' I &-- 1 ------ , I):1 ~2== /04 DES'43 /-- 2 #:t13 ; 1 :f:â€¢w - BASINN,8 ti'=UVTE-,-â€ž, -*- Â· -T \ 5-/7 Er 2.--., PROPOSECASPHALTPAW~ENT 1 23f \All ; 1JiÂ°ttlkÂ·Â·Â«eÂ·Â· - - - - : ~- d i,[L~ '... -Â·' Â·' ~ Â· PAcPosEocoNcRETEP.vEME. Z m ' /~IAM*Il'ViRS I t--L.1 ' --6-Abv-- -- 8%5319-'--VE. Â· 74' PLNurAI.DS-OR.~ 4O44bit *ch, \Emerizrr#-n=--...S.L.,1,-- PROPOSEOLA.SCA4NG 1 QUAL,r, I.'..1 LEXMGVAUE'PANAND EXISTING LEGEND / / ~relzETOICONFIRM[t - Li . .,M. ..7.-"--- 4~~~ L ~ Wv2UNDE~OLNJW~DfLTERTREATMEâ€¢~VA- - LPROVIDE REQ WATERQUA,llÂ¥,RrA-ME.:'%/29A , 1 10)12*45. ASPEN ALPS BUILDING 100 '' -=-"w:,IN,Coll'OUR - -/O- Â· E.ISTING./OURI.E.AL 81iC â€¢ LOCATEDWITHI~ ~ 84~T0'.Di,VAIER : 1 M QUAt......5 / -â€¢I'l ~ /\1 "0 .21.. 1, 1% nk' i GRAPHIC SCALE 4 Z . 7.14.5 (IN FEETI JOB NO ./0 1,n(h= 20 n SHEET /3 NOI-LOAMiSNOO Ag 02),31,43 3/VE] S-MUN I 'Dll '9Nlkl33NIDN3 SIU .CaNDISE<J 212*11Â£iEEÂ©8'AID 3AN3AV 1NVana -3 602 133Â¥19 NIVVI Ngld All-1VRO 831VAA -IVnld 3 THE LITTLE NELL HOTEL 1 Ae NOISIB 103fONd 1NBMIdO-13A303&I 1310H A>E 09Ed ME]IA33 031IV130 1N3IAIdO-13A30 03NNVld EXISTING & PROPOSED LEGEND -Mhâ‚¬/ ' - EXISTINne:)44Â»tIWIE#VAL -' EAIST]NGcoNrou' \ 2- 133 Â» , ,~ BUSTING SA,rAHYUWÂ·AMAJ,4 :56 Ek,STING WATERMtiq co,i~/STon/Mptier# % -c: - Â· -- EX.'%-EC -Â£LE CaLE GAS ~ ~ Â· Â· I. --- Â¢14 ---- E./TING El. -B' CULE ---â€¢Â·, ----w -- e,EnNOGAS 2 9 4.* Â§LOPE IOE'ANdlm# Z -'â€¢ - Iâ€¢- - E-TWGTELEP~ONE INÂ§ldiNE~5[OR~luilAININUI't~ P[ga}4~STANDAADS IN~[TMZET8 #< , ZEE--' 3> & -'7-'., r.<~e~~>Â·i-1 ------- - 44 -,r - EkISTING OVERHEAO ELECTRIC. -, ~-! ~ - EXIsliNGLNDERGROUNDELECTRIC - - - - EXISTINOCABLE ---i- 1-- 347- . - W% IZÂ»21[84=ir -- <*4-----2-X .., -ii: - - EXIS-INGFIBEAO>-rrc - 1.-*TN- I *- - r - -- - EXIS-INGST.~ SEWER , SE / 5J4' ' #'%& / / WRNWJINUE *- N ---------- EASEWENT 1 ..0 ; VII-24:0\ I..:A Xi 1.N\ 1,4I , 1,//4; j 4 2 4bl .:9''AÂ·9.38 -1- - - SEYBACK f Â·Â·' '<Â·9~-~i, 1 .. '--1 1(Hi G- PVC DUIN ~__ w---.132:xi - x- 49 ./INGELECTRICMA.CLE 1 1 ':> EXIS-ING [>RAI~GE C~Â¥.ELL =-1~ 2 ~,IDÂ·. fp~ EXWING SEWER~W~OE ''..... tÂ· 4:.:59 'A / / ,TAU..1 O EXISTING T./.46 4.*E Â· Â·,2.-'â€¢,.'Â· i "'Re'Pfi,Inioll././. V IS-4Â·K1~RE.E. %.. m 1*PLAT PI.~11- Fl~%1 KU~ Em~INGWATERVAL~E \ 92/ : 0 LANOKe! ADEAFOR 9 EXISTING{/SMETER 2' EXISTING'ECTRICT.:2.MER I .IST'â€¢10 ELECT.... T;IEATMENTIBRC .U .p Q ~.- . 9- â„¢ â„¢ 1 l , / Â·P ,1 " Â·3Jt OVEH~~()~VINLET i Â·Â· E.TI~TE~E~'ll[)I4-P;C28T4 O E./1.....St. / f J ' 2 / 1- 4 PRO,06ED PLJHLIC : ......EGILE./. " '4' 'h ' 0 "It i ~3 ..'-11-1 .<> r u.-O EX~STNG LIGHT POLE ' ~B JJ 9 ' 44 , C~ '-Aj 'Q ' 0 140: DRAINAGE . ,- - - v EkIST"li ~N 111 13 & 1,1 1/ f ,~A~D UTI~ITY [*Il. i rx K . .1.1/.S OAMI'ET 1 ,/'/1 -\ TOBEDETE:/IPED CCA ...ASPEN : Re , e Â·Â·. 0 0/ j / /4 /1.01 4, ./- PROK)SEDCONT...%. z Z IE ...... 1 IN ./POSE'COICUR . a I I ': KE .Â·. i' ,~~PlAT LL.10 592 - ]61)iLâ€¢ '-Pvc.HAIN'll PliSPOSEDSTORMGOtEP : aged L,1 11 NEC *laOONCU~ (Se[TOBrrONâ€žEkl[DPq,[)ft - -,-- PAO['05.DELEC.TUECABLE e h - - - - PROPOSEDGâ€¢S -> 1 I ILHLD./APE AR:A FOR .W 1 6, A 11-2. - i -- - - PRE)POSEDCABLE "' */KIJA~~.*...' - ~ _ -. - p~0~OSED JNCER{*0.NIC ELECTHÂ£ 0 : 7...1. r.- A 4 ' PY Â·Â·./. I 25' ~' ~ A~~u~ilÂ¥&AE F -- ---Â· ~ -- PROPOS. F~EROPTIC - UND.....WATE. j -I " ./. I'll.....VAU' ~ I :4 W mv 11 ~Ufl f T~&~FICRATE~tRENCH ,~ - - PROPOSED'lls/F DISTI.*.2 , ,~ DRAIN TO IN..... 1 , tAJ-1 i FR 1 --c-- 7 21*Ur M RATE) TRENCH j , m. c r-1,4 : 1 \// 1 JI'lit ;btl~ 6 ~CD~INPIPE ,, ~ DR~YTOâ„¢1~ACEPTONgTE ' ' 1 PROODSED CONCRE-E PAVE'ENI f fl # 1// A m./CON=IRMED .- ..O/ FORWAT-AQUA ITÂ¥ ..... .1 . il'1111 - , ' CÂ·:;.12:jÂ·-Â·:'Â· PROPOSED PE RME.. PAVERS ~[6i1KÂ·IMARK ., ,... hj i : Pill .'m.-. PROPOSEDlAN[CSCAPING a \ \: flyÂ·-Â·, SKY HITE tor.t 709 E.DURANTAVE 42.3369 -CtÂ« ' / I. NlvTP.NOIDIAIN~/4LACCI'l]Ol ./.' /0 .A,N 'C]NN+CTIOPOO&Â£0[INDERGAOIJ.-0 ' Â·11 *. VALIU OR ALIEKNAIE WAWER -%- --- I.- CO~NE"5.P'*-Â· I ' QUALITY'EAT....m LANDSCA/*'OR.VATER . ./'' '~3'*U~n ' ~1 j *AC 6~Wl Odg~LN m W.EATMINI , 1 \ t UND[RGAOUNDWATI /..y,6 , B..7 --m - ./. LNDERCROUNDWATER 1 \Ma 6 GLORY HOLE QUA~Ilf 'lt'IVAUT 13*lf'-DRAIN ' j Â·13.~:'. -/:-/ O1~E ~NDIN E~OR - .â€¢NDSUP[ICâ€¢ fÂ¢GWATER CONDOMINIUMS ..aANLA .*81AiMENi t.< ...rlill' " ' /\ ./24 W.*/*' *. F ~52~ioutCO~,iR~1[3 1 1 ' 1 1// D'I'~.IE'/"ia ' 4 \IsizE tO BE CON./.4..â€¢ I . Â·Â·~~ ._I ./. 0/(CRA~NAPE 1 WAI"QUALITYIREATMEN] \ i To U....... ' -4 --- &25-m 1 Â»77) A..p~10=NG'ERÂ¥Iri A/ / *.Â£/I I # ~Â·Â· / ,-i Â·,ip.IJÂ» '- 4. JA-21-.-Â·11 -in . - M. .....1Â¥P... \ \'i 5TANDARI . 1 4 - Â·14 ' * ,/ ,/ 61.UTR~,it9914Â»Rm PNV~91645 ' vIi 6 N - ---:."Ilit,ING .1 ...-#+-- , L .//3 l LU05(AP[AA'04;kfeR, ~ %//h...'ll --X' \- ~"IM1/ -Â· 0 ~%. - ---2=--E 164841, ~ 3%\ :f~=MT' -% Â£ .*-- -:izzz:E;r.J~~~~~~~ -- / / . . . -2>yk. TR:....UN , l. N ' M I 1 -942--2 - . / \11 7 9 1 \: 4, : , GRAPHICSCALE I Know whal'sbelow. IINFEETI Ca|| before you dig. DATE: --14-15 1 i. = 20 I c.,1 MugNESS DA.S k *.Jc liEDUCEDFOOSLBÂ»111. '6;4Â¢t'~6,'*,6 jitr jOB NO. Â·4040 wiw*Qi,nu-*s SHEET . NOI RELSNOO AS 02~0~90 aivc ....' Â·Ill '9NIW33NI A. CIENDISIO I SlNvl 3nN3AV INVMna -3 602 .t.%6 NOILVollddV M3IA3M 0311Y1-30 1NBINdO-3A30 03NNV- VI.A. THE IrTLE NEli HOTEL L9Ed Nols,Aa/ ON 1NBIAId013A36323 131OH AMS 18 N NÂ¥-Id 39VNIVMO . T GENERAL UTILITY NOTES < 1 [ 04 r~ACTOR TOCOORODIA-E .A40011.,ENT RELO:CAYION ANI}BUR....... .WIES - 1 1 C , '-RTHEUT.I...IDERS ..............ING: BEOCINQA. BA//LL WORK NECESSARÂ¥FORUTILITYRELOCATION T.~TILITY PROVIDENISTOPERFORI, ALLLINEWORK / All/ON[*16111.6//,t~ I- ----- 2 T. COMT.ACTORSHAIC./ADI'SCONSTRUCTIONOPE.TIONSWIT#T.E.ITS. 1 . / sc/*../ #./. 1 / r MAIN.R.A.All' 9 'I / p-K ' < -' '. i~ / m.*IANDAWN. ** I C 3 THEto~o,GCÂ¢UNDERGAOUNDUT,UnESHAVEBEEyPtorTE~8ASEDONU~LnY,~. LOaTES 0 0 ceW.-,EpacpER~OMIRM.I.S. Of- CONSTRUC-,0,l CONTRACTCR SÂ·,AU NO- CPERATE OUTS,CE -HS AREAW,-hdrT THE PRIOR -h ~~ 2 ' MAS /-Â·i. 4-1-#- 4 't / 2 X-,I.%. % - OROTHEq,NFORMATIONPROVIDED~Y JTILITYCOMPANiESANDACTUALAnDLO~nl~~mNS~E Z INSTANCES. DIESEUTIOTIES ASSMOWNMAYNOTREPRESENTACT~ALFIELDCONCnION~ ITISâ„¢E RESPONSIBILIT' OF THE CONTRACTOR TO COITACT ALL UTIUTY COMPANIES FOR FELD LOCATION. UTIUTIESPR,OR.CONSTRUCTICÂ»i / SERVKE ATTIE MAIN - LIABLE FORANY DAMAGES TO ORI,fTERRUP-,O,1 OF SERVICES CAUSEDBY â„¢ECONSTRUCâ„¢)4 ~t,Â·*i~- t~:-44~~,-'~ i ~ ~~ * - 4. Al JUUTIES 50. UNDE......OVE.......1/INEDINCO. NUOUSSERVICE ABANDON~,15* .1 . f .< ~RA{~Rl./00/ lic .-N 'IFI[D CLAY .... -- -\ 2 \\ -K T,AOUGHOJT THE ENT,~E CONSTRUCTI>, PE'CD. TIâ€¢E CONT.....0 BE RESPONS,aE AND -g#/IN- -- h ....ORTOCOOR....LUT.........THERESPECTMUTRI...Al PRI0RTOCONSTRUCT~04 1 Ill /NÂ«, :..1/1â€ž - ; >- - ./05LD+IL .PAH.E. '. A .4.-~ -1- -,; 19 -- & e...Al'WOAKSHALLBEINCOMPL~NCE#.Cli. OFASPEN.LESIREGLIiiaNS I , ./.1//PRNâ„¢.SPECIFI'llole O , // 734 40 jj ~; PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS NOTE: 7, 1 1 , ~/,2 e.4 2 4'': .: ) N% *. 41 44 1 ( /Ii , pu~lopic_ .w,;,.,4 -*.4LJ. #*-- *? l., 1 .BLICI~PR. EMWSSHAUGENCOMJL~NCE...ECTY.FASPENE*NEE-,STANCARDS ' 1,AN-*ki i~,Â£~,~RTHMPW v y ~ / ANDan'OFASPENROWSTAti,RDS PleUCIPRO~â„¢ENTs,NT}â‚¬Rowl,uSTMEETTHECrrS 4 4 CONSTRUCIONANDEXCA.noNST#.. p1Â· , *DEPR~ATE. NON EXCL~M * ' 7.Z~P | ~~4- LF ..\ '04 1.*c.,c.'.c ,. *M- , - - --- m H 2 CONT'ACT..0!113-Aa WATER SE.VIC=PERCITÂ¥(]FASPE,ISTAIR)ARCS *STRLCT,04 5,4't '' ' G~EWEGRESSI~EA,iNT * - --Â· ~' il .NOIS REQUIREDPRIOATOCOMMENCEMENTOFWORK PROPO~DAUU.K rORCHATEAU[HAUMON' .--,7 - )& . *--- h...i d J le'. 2114 : ANOCHArt"Ollm" .&Â·>': 0 Â· "Â£7 PER'wAT TcH-~, v.vt#J-2,~(1:,in-24 4#-*I- -- -4/, A s ' Au 1 A.......P-HS SEPAR/TONDISTANCES WATI'll.OR./.601....LBE / T 6 I r CONFI.....)RJI,~TEDW~Hh'LITY>40-EAPER I,AGREEME.5 . 0 PROPOS..'..... M IG .Â·' Al)1Â·9Â·7' Â· ~cas,-mi A>Â· A' r ,!I[NCH/EAS[M[,Ir -.- - P RAC~&1ANDARDS 9 f '~/f 53'' 'RNÂ¢R' ~.- ~~ â€ž.-r.. -, -Â· i '' 0 2. ALLU~ILITYLIKE8*NOORCenmTOam.01UE. T.SLITABLi--ER.~RnEMGOCKS,1 875== \, /\ /// 8 4.;e.20 < - - - . - UE.467- -- 'L Â·..~ .. 1 1 '.....li.â€¢I t' / U & 1,2'0. LSECLAS.6AGGREGATEBA~-ER. FO~86OO1.%.S.JITAall/11/rTE--E~1. ' ..... I. D........ ---\\ -'Â»' / '4 .STALL PER [minY P.(00ER SPECIA'Al./.BACI'. TRENCHES'll S.-AaE ONSITE AfPROnMAr'~D[An[)NOÂ£ ~' ~ h: VA FMOPOMODOOM[STKWATIâ€¢& '77- 'IR,Sl-P-Â£*41Â§,IMCI â„¢ 1 ....ELECTICTOBE!.TALiEDINSE'ARATETRENCHES SEWERSERVI[:ESTO'Al/Ell I~ETA-LNEW 1248'TIE&8~ ' i 1%*mIEOUNCA-ROOM :..Â·/7... 6 4 ./.H/Ol"]5%... 4 Â£ c.li.01.......Is-RUCTION..elun..........EONDISTANCES M.%/'- *Ull.fl~%MLNT -4 1 A~CEP186.BJI ANE.IMFAINED INSTAUWAR-:-APE OVER ALL JTLITi'LIS. C~KIEAU DUMONT REUOVBE~STINGGA&METER ' i, Â£39*V t, p.â€žs,~s arrENoTELEpwoN[ FIBEâ€¢ ~. I r, ' I: ELECTRIC-. j : 4 +A L.....kAGE / ......1.FROU......."/FEASEILE C./U~CATIONS'AY'"STALLEDIN ANOFIBEROPT,CSERE.CES AOUTE /c..6.,1 , P:â€¢â‚¬.r.9 Â·2 j [RA--LH ANDEL,Crl.vAUr MINIMUM CE,1-k 1...Im.*AN )[ABI < -*-tr/<~ f *9===---. sÂ£~~CN~2 7, '' Â· -i Â·' .:"l%~ 4. 919 - -- . 0 1 Â¤6E F. I' 111 p "[ W U 49 ,-. ~ ~~MOlORAINAOE ~~444- N4~4--1 'fy/ UTILITY PLAN LEGEND -, i ,/ t-/ANDUIILI!Â¥LAIMENT 3-Â·-7 ..CSE'WA-ERSENCE U 0 i Â®11 h u .I-:/ E -1 *N-r*.LEP,Â¢01.EAND , 1 Zilt -a' - - ......6 CHATEAU CHAUMONT I, Â· Â«-/.L,i 1 â‚¬ CA~~25*#NP(ACEO'*t ; - 1 - 1,1 - PROPOSEOUNDERCROUNDELECTRIC t f i. - Â·- p Ropos ED TELErHONE ASNE'YPERL,nuTÂ¥PRO~OERS / m - ,~ - PROPOSEDTELE CA8/ ELEC.'F~ER-RENCH j '#PROPO.DWATEAVALVE , ,' PROPosEDELEcm/TRA.FoRMER 1 1 2 ' i J..fe.I: 8 P.......EANOUT tor 4 "OSECSTORUI'E- 709 E. DURANT AVE 3 / 11 ' 1. 2.E.... - n 7 -222 . --- - (-42 - - \21 / :42,336/ ' , _.. ./TINGWATER'/IN :WY&* -i -â€¢â€¢ ---- EXall.*SEWERMAIN IMOVEEQUING ELECTRIC - - -- Â»44' t / V / - .Â£ -f. 9"""EXIST"40 ELEC -ELE CABLE GAS TAA+J~~~MER& ~4ETERP[~~OL' CRDS~EAERGÂ¥5 STANDAR(Z - 2 ~'Â« - - 'h / A .F 2 f,;Â« . - EXISTING ELEC -ELE CABLE 1 11 -Â· -- ~ - - Ekls,1,16're~E.01,5 PE'OVE'ING, CAS'/3/TAL P=~ COMCAW~L~ 4 ~ - EÂ»ST!.C]ERGAOI;*ID ..TRIC SECOND...ACE I -- EXISTING FI8ER OP-IC - - 1- , 1-7Â«.121 43 - 4 - Â·# - EXISTWGIRRIGATIONPPE --- Â·Â·Â·-Â·Â·Â·Â·-- EASEUENT 1 !41 GLORY HOLE i; Â· ----- PAOFE.Â¥U. ,â€¢ - .SETBACK 0 1 //1 1, - r. p 1 41' 1 1 . E./INK.ELEC~;4.1~~.E 9 1 9 # 1 O EXISTINOSEWERMANHOLE Ve 16.% \\\, *3LD r /(5,0 .-. 1./Ci./.Al i / ) Â¥ EXISTINGFI./IANT Z Elicr~csiala I 4. . \ 32*t... -3-t. >f Ex ISTINGWA-ERVALVE * EX~ENDIEWW,â€¢U 11 f lific L. ' ' .....:IME Ch,4- 1 / 4/ //PF 2 1 . ./ING'ECT.ICTAANS~... I ./ING...CUETER Et,STING'ELEPHC....TAL EXISTI. CATVPECITAL 'r k *\ Â·Â· -Â·:.*/4,1* -2 -, *, . - ..1- - 1 11* E % -/4.2â€¢ERCLEA'..' 0/>'lA \ ' . 6 AliNG-wrpor '6LOCATEE:.46'F.ly'.1 Ti 1*1 Ex~TNGSTORMI~ET Z DEP~TMEN*TUE*Al i !1 1-'; M#.4 ' 1 ula % WOSCAFEARIA......R 11 1 2/fil i b 4 \ 16,AL"WGAss,du.09.~ 5, ' \- .......GULAnONS 1.5,â€¢Li ' 8%'""ATFACE OF BulaG, 1 --1r---.)-- -, i.#W: 7 n L ASPENALPS BILDING 100 44 ;rf , SHALLOW UTILITY NOTES: Z , 1 4'24 1 Ill i 1 1 111#23 - u, 9 4 *% 4 \%- i D-i .AliS....COMPACTION'/1./.0./.S U. ~ 1 )' .gLE.-'/ 1.- 1 1 . 1; 111 7 1 - . - PROPOSED..AIrr SEWER. CE -7V Â· mri~ 11....RiG'ti/-1231 L L" i --- 11 -t : 1 th ; 1 1 Ul /' f 4PROPOSED'.ME'ERVALVE l -Â· -â€¢. - EXISâ„¢GSTORMSENER -Â·.: --1 - E./INGOVE,180.... 1 , Â¢b E.STINGOR.I..).IL : I j A ..<%.TER . -1 4 '0 1 il h\/ , E...GR'IRICI 9-1 40 f T 4 .--I I '00~=W'Wea ' I LU GRAPH C SCALE Know.hurs below. NY,wiw T Ca|!before you dig. <IN FEETI 0. a ..,1... DATE .15 1 nch = 20 ft Â¢â€¢41 2 M â€¢86 Â»S â€¢ ; JOB NO. '4040 SHEET . Cucd NOIIJAH SNOO Ag 03/ rME LITTLE NELL HOTEL Ae 03,40530 ~ SiNV11ASNO Vafla -3 602 BakiLS Nt, ]1VCJ Ag NOISIA- 'IS WN,9180 HlnOS INBINd013A303kl 131OH A>IS 1 -3-11 'SNIG33NIDN3 SINdos M3IA3U 0331V130 1N3P',IdO13A30 03NNVld 900 . SITEWORK GENERAL NOTES LAYOUT & MATERIALS NOTES PLANTING NOTES .0 - 1. THE GENERALCONTRACTOR SHALLBE RESPONSIBLEFORCOORDINATiNG ALLWORKBY 1HE 1. LAYOUT AND VER'. D'MENS]INS PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION. NOTIFY LANDSCAPE ARCHnECr OF ANY 1. PLANT MATERIAL ]S TO .HEALTHY SPECIMENS FREE FROM DiSEASE OR DAMAGE, AND !5 TO BE SUBCONTRACTORS. DISCREPANCIES. LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT TO REVIEW AND APPROVE All LAYOUTS CONTAINED [N THE MAiNTAINED IN EXCELLENT COND.ON WHILE ON THE )OBSITE LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT SHALL INSPECT CONSTRUCTION DOCUMENTS PRIORTO CONSTRUCION. PLANT MATERIAL UPON ARRIVAL TO JOBS[TE AND WILl REJECT PLANT MATERIAL THAT DOES NOT MEET rowland+broughton 2. CONTRACTOR SHALL VER[FY ALL CONDITIONS AT ]08 SITE AND NOTIFY LANDSCAPE ARCH~TECr AND THESTANDARDS DESCRIBEDWITH]N THE CONTRAC DOCUMENTS. A#aum/#ande*/,Nenordes. GENERAL CONTRACTOR OF DIMENSIONAL ERRORS, OMISSIONS OR DISCREPANCIES BEFORE BEGINNING 2. WR]TTEN DIMENSIONS SHALL TAKE PRECEDENCE OVER SCAZED DIMENSIONS. DO NOT SCALE 234 01,0.Ins ave 1830 b.-- 200 ANYWORK. DIMENSIONS FROM REDUCED DRAWINGS. 2. THE LANDSCAPE ARCHHLCT WILL PERIODICAL LY [NSPECT PLANT MATERIAL STOCKP.ED AND/OR PLANTED aspen.. 81611 d~ver ./202 ON SUE DURING THE COURSE OF CONSTRUCTION. PLANT MATERIAL NOT MEETING THE STANDARDS 970.544 9006 0 30330813730 3 CONTRACOR TO OBTAIN AU NECESSARY PLRMITS PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION. All CONTRACTORS MU5T 3. DiMENS.NS REFERRED TO AS WEQUAL" IN/CATE SPACING WHICH IS EQU]DEANT MEASURED TO THE CONâ„¢NED WmilN CONTRACT DOCUMENTS SHALL BE REPtACED AT NO COST TO THE OWNER. 970.544./731 Â®3,30&1375' COMPLY WITH PERM:T REQU[REMENTS, LOCAL STATE AND FEDERAL JURED]CnONS AND GOVERNING CEN'niRL]NES. BODIES/AGENCIES RULES AND REGULATIONS AND LAND USE APPROVAL COND[TIONS AT ALL TIMES. 3. PROVID[ MA[CH]NG 5,7[S ANID FORMS FOR [ACH PLANT OF IHE SAME SPECfES UNLESS OTHERWISE 4. MEASUREMENTS ARE TO â„¢E FINISHED FACE OF BUILDINGS, WALLS, OR OTHER FIXED./E INDICAILD. 4. WORK PERFORMED WITHOUT APPROVAL OF "OCAL. STATE AND FEDERAL JURID[CTIONS AND GOVERNING [MPROVEMENTS. DIMENSIONS TO CENTERUNES ARE IDENTIFIED AS SUCH. BODIES/AGENCIES AND/OR NOT IN COMPLIANCE WITH SPEC[F[CAnONS AND/OR DRAWINGS I5 SUBJEC 4. CONTUCTOR TO VERIFY ALL QUANT'NES. iN CASE OF D"CREPANCIES, GRAPHICAUY SHOWN TO REMOVAL AT CONTRACOR'S EXPENSE. 5. [NSTALL INTERSECINIG ELEMENTS AT 90-DEGREE ANGLES UNLESS OTHERWISE INDICATED, MA[NTAIN QUANT[nES SHALL TAKE PRECEDENCE. HORIZONTAL AUGNMENT OF ADJACENT ELEMENTS AS IND[CATED IN CONTRACT DOCUMENTS. 5. ALL WORK SILL CONFORM TO /11 APPROPRIATE AGENCNES. CONTRACTOR SHALL VER'FY LOCATION OF 5. ALL MATERIALS USED SHALL CONFORM TO THE GUIDELINES Â£5TABLISHED BY â„¢E CURRENT AMERICAN ALL EXISTING UTIOTIES, LINES AND STRUCTURES PR]OR TO EXCAVAT]ON OR TRENCHING. DAMAGE 6. THE CONTRACrOR SHALL PROVIDE A Full SCALE MOCKUP AND RECENE APPROVAL FROM THE LANDSCAPE STANDARDS I OR NURSERY SIOCK. PUBUSHED 8. THE AMERON ASSOCIATION OF NURSERYMEN SHALL BE REPAIRED BY THE CONTRACTOR AT NO COST TO THE OWNER. THE LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT ARCHITECT FOR ALL SYSTEMS 8EFORE SEGINfi]NG CONSTRUCION OF PAVEMENT Consullang ASSUMES NO RESPONS~BILITY FOR UTILITIES OR STRUCTURES NOT SHOWN ON THE DRAWINGS. 6. ALL PLANT MATERIAL SHALL BE .STALLED PLUMB AND PER THE SPEC;FiCATIONS CONTAINED WITHIN THE CONTRACTOR IS TO VERIf Y IllE EXACT LOCATION OF unLIT]ES PR[OR TO CONS [RUCNION AND NOTIFY 7. EXPANNON JOINTS SHALL BE PROVIDED WHI 1.WORK MFETS VERTICAL 51RUCTURES. SUCH AS CONTRACTDOCUMENTS ANYNECESSARYSTAK,NGAND/OROTHERSUPPORTSMATERIAU/METHODS mE ~ANDsc~PE ARCHITECT 01: ANY DISCREPANCIES, CONTRACTOR SHALL USE EXTREME CAuTION WHEN WALLSr CURBSr STEPS. AND OTHER HARD!,CAPE ELEMENTS. EXPANSION JOINTS SHALL ALSO BE SHALL 8E SUBMJITLD TO THE IANDSCAPE ARCHHECT FOR REV[El AND APPROVAL PRIOR TO WORKING OVER OR NEAR EXISTING GAS AND ELECTRICAL LINES, PROV[DEDATMATERNALCHANGES. EXPANS[ON JO]NTMATERLUS/METHODS SHAG eE SUBMITTEDTO INSTALLA110]N. THE LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT FOR REVIEW AND APPROVAL PRIOR TO 1NSTALLAT]ON. 6. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR RESEmNG All LAND MONUMENTS DISRUPTED BY 7. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL P.UNE EXISTING AND/OR NEW TREESONLY PER LANDSCAPEARCHITE. CONSTRUCTION ACT]VITIES OR NEGLIGENCE ON THE PART OF THE CONTRACTOR. RESETS SHALL .E 8. CONTROL)01. T5 SHOULD BE 5PACED NOGREATER THAN TEN (1% LINEAR FEET MAXIMUM, UNLESS DIRECTION 300 s ..g ~; "'e 202 PERFORMED UNDER THE SUPERVIS]ON OF A RfGISTERED LAND SURVEYOR AND MONUMENT RECORDS OTHERWISE SPECIFIED. EXPANSION JOINTS SHOULD BE SPACED NO GREATER THAN FORTY(40) LINEAR 970 429.7499 0 aspe~,co 81611 MUST BE FILED AS REQ"RED BY STATUTE FOR ALL MONUMENTS. FEET MAXIMIUM, UNIN 9 55 OTHERWEE SPEC] 1 11 D. CONTRACIOR SHAL L ADVi5E ON OTHER JOINT5.5 8. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL 5TAKE THE LOCAT[ONS OF ALL TREES AND B. SHRUBS FOR LANDSCAPE 970 4299499 f NEEDED TO MINIMIZE CRACKING. â„¢IS INFORMATION SHALL BE ...MITrED TO THE LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT REVIEW AND APPROVAL, PR1OR TO [NSTALLATiON wwN.bluegreeAaspen.c>m 7 A. CONS.RUCI.N ANO MATERIALS NOT SPEC[E~CALLY ADDRESSED ]N THE CONTRAMmENTS O. ~ mR RMEW ANAP~ '01'157'LwTID' ~~ blu SPECIFICATIONS SHALL BE IN ACCORDANCE W]TH LOCAL. STATE AND FEDERAL JURISDICTIONS AND 9. ALL ROOT-WRAPPING MATERIALS THAT ARE NOT /0-DEGRADABLE SHALL BE REMOVED FROM THE ROOT GOVERNING BODIES/AGENCIES STANDARDS. 9, CONTROL JOINTS SHU BE PROVIDED AS SPECI'ED IN THE CONTRACT DOCUMENTS. CONTROL JOINT BALL. ROOT BALLS SHALL BE FREE OF WEEDS. MATERIAL5r ~ETHODS AND RECOMMEND. 101'iS ON ADD[!IDNAL CONTROL ..S TO M[NIMIZE 8. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL TAKE ALL PRECAUTIONARY MEASURES NECESSARY TO PROTECT EXiSTING CUCKING SHALL BE SUBMITTED TO THE LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT FOR REVIEW AND APPROVAL. 10 SPECIFIED PLANT MATER]AL SIZES SHALL BE CONS]DERED MINIMUM SIZES. IMPROVEMENTS FROM DAMAGE AND AU SUCH IMPROVEMENTS AND STRUCTURES DAMAGED BY THE CONTRACTORS OPERATIONS SHALL BE REPAIRED OR RECONSTRUCTED SATEFACTORY TO THE 10. ALL STEPS SHALLHAVE FOURTEEN (14) INCH TREADS AND SIX (6) INCH RISERS, UNLESS OTHERWISE 11. FINISH GRADE OF PLANTING BEDS SHALL BE ONE (1) INCH SEOW ADJACENT FLATWORKr UNLESS LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT AT THE CONTRACTOR'S EXPENSE. SPECIFIED. SPECIFIED OTHER'[SE. Issue: 9. ALL BARR]CADING AND TEMPORARY TRAFFIC CONTROL DEVICES OR METHODS USED DURING 11. HOLD TOP OF WALLS AND FENCES LEVEL, UNLESS .THERVISE SPECIF[ED. 12 MULCH OR PLANT~NG BED DRESSING SHALL BE PLACED 'N ALL PLANTING AREAS AS SPECIFIED. MULCH OR 07.14.15 CONSTRUCTION SHALL BE IN ACCORDANCE WITH LOCAL STATE AND FEDERAL JUINSDICT~ONS AND PLANTING BED DRESSING SHALL NOT BE PLACED WNHIN SIX (6) INCHES OFTREEIRUNKS. MULCHING PLANNED DEVELOPMENT GOVERNING BODIES/AGENCIES STANDARDS. PROVIDE ADEQUATE IME FOR REViEW AND APPROVAL BY 12. CONTRACTOR 5. ALL NOT INSTALL WORK LOCATED ON TOP OF ARCHITECTURAL 5TRUCTURES W]THOUT SHOULD BEREPEATED ANNUALLY DURING THE AUTUMN TO A -HREE (3) 1NCH DEPT,i =DRMEWAPPUCATION THE ABOVE JURISDICT DNS PR]OR TO COMMENCEMENT, FIRST REVIEWING ARCHITECTURAL DRAWINGS. 13. ALL PLANT MATERIAL SHOWED RECENE AN ORGANIC FERTIUZER IN UM]TED APPUCATiON FOLOW.NG 10. THE LANDSCAPE ARCHrECT IS NOT RESPONSIBLE FOR THE CONSTRUCTION MEAN5. METHODSr 13. SAMPLES OF SPECIFIED MATERIALS SHALL BE SUBMITTED TO THE LANDSCAPE ARCH]TECT FOR REVIEW INSTALLAT~ON. TYPE AND APPUCATION RATE AND METHOD OF APPL]CATION TO BE SPECIFIED BY THE TECHNIQUES, SEQUENCES UTILIZED OR FOR SAFETY PRECAUTIONS OR PROBLEMS IN CONNECTION WITH AND APPROVAL PRiOR TO ORDER(NG ~OR JOB. CONTRACTOR ANDAPPROVED BYTHE LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT. TI IF WORK. THE LANDSCAPE ARCHITECr W]LL NOT [W RESPONSIBLL FOR THE CONTRACTOR S FAILURE TO CARRY OUT THE WORK lN ACCORDANCE WITH THE CONTRACT DOCUMENTS. CONTRAC DOCUMENTS 14. EXCESS FERTILIZER SHALL BE DISPOSED OF PROPERLY OFF.S.E. IT SHALL NOT BE DISPOSED OF IN INCLUDE THE CON5TRUCTION DOCUMENT DMWING SEUTECHN]CAL SPECIFICATIONS MANUAL/LAgS. STORM DRAINSAND/OR DRYWELLS. 11, CONTRACTOR TO VERIFY ALL QUANT1111 S. IN CASE OF ANY DISCREPANCIES, GRAPH]CALLY SHOWN 15. STOCKPILED PLANT MATERIAL TO BE PLACED lN THE SHADE AND PROPERLY HAND-WATERED UNTIL MATERiALQUANTITIES SHALLTAKE PRECEDENCE. PLAI,ITED 12, A SYSTEM OF DIAGRAMMATICSYMBOLS. HATCHES AND NOTATIONSIS USED IN THESE DRAWINGS. GRADING NOTES 16. MINI-NUGGET .PE DECORATIVE BARK MULCH WILL 85 USED TO RETURN NUTRINTS TO THE SOR REVIEW NOTAT1ONS CAREFULLY, NOTIFY LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT AND REQUEST CLARIFICATiON OF ANY REDUCE MAINTENANCE AND MINIM[ZE I VAPORATION FOR AREAS APPROxlMATE TO THE RES~DENCE. UNCLEAR NOTATION OR DISCREPANO PRIOR TO COMMENCING WORK. LARGER SHREDDED BARK MULCH mEL BE USED FOR STEEP AREAS SO SLOUGH1NG IS LESS UKELY TO i. vERIFY Ex"TING E....INS PRIOR TO STARING WORK. NOT.. .NOSCAPE ARCHITECT OF ANY OCCUR. 13. PROV[DE SLEEVES AS REQUIRED FOR DRAINAGE, IRR[GAT[ON AND ELECTRICAL LINES. IRRIGATION AND DISCREPANC[ES, EXISTINGAND PROPOSED GRADESARE BASED ON SURVEYDOCUMENTS PREPARED BY ELECTR[CAL SLEEVES Allie SUBSURFACE ORAiNAGE SYSTEMS SHALL BE CONSTRUCTED PR]OR TO PAvlNG SURVEYOR. 17. PRESERVE & PROTECT ALL EXISTING VEGETATION INDICATED TO REMAIN AT ALL TIMES AND WNDSCAPE WORK. UTILITY SLEEVES ARE REQU]RED IN ALL PLANT BEDS ISOLATED BY PAVEMENT OR ANY OTHER STRUCTURES+ 2. CONTRACTOR SHALL VERI. THE PLACEMENT OF FLATWORK PENETRATIONS TO ENSURE COORDINATION I. ALL VEG[TAT[ON PROPOSED FOR OUTSIDE THE BURD[NG ENVELOPE TO BE NATIVE UNLESS (THERWIE OF SURFACE FIXTURES, SUCH AS DRAINS AND L[GHTS. NOTI. GENERAL CON[RACTOR AND LANDSCAPE NOTED. PLANING THAT OCCURS OUTSIDE THE BUILDING ENVELOPE ]S FOR RESTORATION PURPOSES 14. SPECIAL CONSIDERATION 15 GIVEN TO THE DESIGN AND INN NDED RE. IONSH[P BETWEEN ARCH~TECT OF D1SCREPANIES PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION OF FLATWORK ONLY OR / SPECIFIC TO U.LITIES RESTORAION ARCH~ECTURE. PLANTiNGAREASAND PAVING SYSTEMS. PAVEMENT]OINT]NG,PAVERS,STONE FINISHES AND GRADES HAVE BEEN STRIC[LY COORDINATED iN THE CONTRACT DOCUMENTS. 3. THE CONTRACORSHAL REFER TO THE ARCHITECTURALDRAWINGSTI VERIFY FINISHED FLOOR 19 IX (6) INCH PLANT MIX SHALL BE PROVIDED FOR ALL LAWN, TURF, AND NATIVE PLANTING ZONES. 18 CONSTRUCTION OF THESE SYSTEMS SHALL BE STRICTLY COORDINATED. ELEVATIONS. THE GENERAL CONTRACOR AND LANDSCAPE ARCHrrECT SHALLBE NOTI'ED [F.ERE ARE INCH PLANT MIX SHALL BE PROVIDED FOR ALL PERENN[AL PLANTING BEDS UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED. ANY DISCREPANCIES PRiOR TO CONSTRUCTION. 15. VEH]CLES. EQUIPMENT' AND/OR MATERiALS SHALL NOT BE PARKED OR STORED I AREAS OF EXISTING VEGETATION, 1/CLUDING WITHIN THE DRIPUNE OF EXISTING TREES TO REM,UN. 4. THE CONTRACORSHALL REFER TO THE MECHAN'CAL DRAWINGS TO VERIFY DRAIN LOCATIONS OVER STRUCTURE. THE GENERAL CONTRACTOR AND LANDSCAPE ARCH]TECT 5 HALL BE NOTIFIED OF ANY 16. LANDSCAPE MATERIALS To BE STORED UNDER SECURED TARPS OR SHEETING TO PR07EC AGAINST DISCREPANCIES PRIOR To CONSTRUCTION. Â· SOIL EROSION CONTROL NOTES W[ND, RA~14, AND SNOW DAMAGE. 5. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL REFER TO THE CIVIL ENGINEERING DRAWINGS TO VERIFY UTI'll AND OTHER 1. PRIOR TO BEGINNING ANY EARTH CHANGEr THE CONTRACOR SHALL INSTALL AND MAINTA]N ALL SESC 17. CONSTRUCT]ON WASTE-iNCLUDING BUT NOT UM'TED TO PLANT MATERIAL, BUILDING MATER1ALSr DRAIN LOCATIONS. THE GENERAL CONTRACTOR AND LANDSCAPE ARCH[TECT SHALL BE NOTIFIED OF ANY MEASURES AS SHOWN ON THE CONTRACT DOCUMENTS AND AS REQUIRED BY ANY GOVERNING AGENCfES. DEMOLISHED MATERIALS, PACKAG]NG LEFTOVER PAINT AND CONCRETE SLURRY-SHOULD BE PROPERLY DISCREPANCIES PRIOR TO CONSTRUCT]ON REUSED, RECYCLED, DISPOSED OF LEGALLY OFF EE OR IN DESIGNATED WASH-OUT AREAS DETERM[NED 2. ALL SESC MEA5URES TO BE MAINTAINED DAILY. BY THE GENERAL CONTRACTOR 6. PROPOSED ELEVAT1ONS INDICATED ON DRAWINGS ARE ANISHED GRADE ELEVATIONS. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL DIRECT ROUGH GRADE WORK TO ALLOW FOR SUFFICIENT TOPSOIL AND OTHER 3. THE CONTRACTOR TO CONDUCT ALL EX.VATION, FILING. GRADING, AND CLEANUP OPERATIONS INA 18. RE.CLING AND TRASH BINS TO BE PROVIDED ON SrE. SEPARATE BINS FOR CARDBOARD, CO-M[NGLED, FINISHED CONDITIONS AS DESCRIBED IN THE CONTRAC DOCUMENTS. MANNER SUCH THAT SE'MENT, GENEUTED BY WfIND OR WATER IS NOT DISCHARGED INTO ANY STORM AND OTHER REC...UE/REUSAM MATER]ALS IDENTIFIED BY THE LOCAL JURISDICTION SHALL BE SEWER, DRAINAGE DITCH RIVER' LA. .R OR UNDER<GROUND UTILINY SYSTEM. STAGE WORK To SKY HOTEL MAINTAINED All. GINS TO [!E WIDLIFE-PROOf. 7. ALL FINISHED GRADES SHALL MEET AND BLEND SMOOTHLY WITH EXISTING GRADES AT THE PROJECT LIMIT. MINIMIZE THE AREA OF EXPOSED SOIL, THERE8Y REDUCING THE OPPORTUNITY FOR SOIL EROS[ON. 19. ON-SITE FUEL STORAGE FOR CONSTRUCTIN EQUIPMENT IS DISCOURAGED. CONSTRUCTION EQUIPMENT 4. WATER FROM TRENCHESAND OTHER EXCAVATIONT' BE PUMPED INTO A FILTRATION 8/G TO REMOVE USED ONSITE TO BE CHECKED REGULARLY TO ASSURE CONTAMINAnON CONCERNS FROM OILS AND 8. ALL FINISHED GRADES SHALL aE WITHOUr lOW SPOTS OR PXKETS, CONTRACTOR SHALL SET FLOW SEDiMENTS FROMTHEWATER. GRE,EES ARE ELIMINATED. NO TOXIC MATERIALS SHALL BE STORED ON-SITE. LIES ACCURATELY AND PROVIDE A MINIMUM OF TWO (2) PERCENT OR MAX]MUM OF IFTY (50) PERCENT, UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED+ 5. NORTH AMERICAN GREEN SC-10 OR EQUIVALENT EROSION CONTROL FABRIC [s REQUIRED ON All 20. GENERAL CONTRACOR TO KEEP ALL ITEMS ]MPLEMENTED BY LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT IN PROPER DISTURBED SLOPES GREATER THAN 3:1 UNTIL PROJECT AREA . REVEGErATED PER THE PLANT]NG PLAN. 709 E. DURANT AVENU WORKING ORDCR THROUGHOUT THE DUUTION 01 Mt PROJECT. 9. ALLFINISHED GRADES SHALL PRESENT 5MOOTH TRANSITIONS BETWEEN TOES AND TOPS OF SLOPES. ASPEN,CO 81611 6. PROVIDE POSITIVE DRA]NAGE AWAY FROM ALL STRUCTURES. 21. THE CONSTRUCTiON S[TE TO .E INSPECTED 0/ A MONTHLY BASIS BY LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT AND/OR 10. THE MAXIMUM SLOPE OF SOD TO BE 3:1 IN AREAS DESIGNATED AS - LAWN.- UNLESS OTHERWISE 4OTED. CIVIL ENGINEER TO ASSURE THAT THE 5[LT FENCE AND MUD TRACKING PAD ARE PROPERLY IN PLACE AND 7, CONTRACTOR TO PROVIDE ONSITE WATERING TO REDUCE FUGITIVE DIST LEAV]NG THE SITE DURING FUNCTION~NG A5 DES]GNED. 11. ALL MANHOLfS. VALVE SOXES, UTILITY BOXES AND PEDESTALS, AND OTHER APPURTENANCES SHALl BE CONSTRUCT]ON. ADJUSTED TO FINISH GRADE IN ACCORDANCE W]TH THE LOCAL. SLATE Al,D FEDERAL JURISDICTIONS 22. GREEN BUILD]NG PRACTICES SHALL BE EMPLOYED TO THE EXTENT FEASIBLE. SUCH PRACTICES INCLUDE: AND GOVERNING BODIE5/AGENCIES OR UTILITY RULESAND REGULATIONS, UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED. 8 50]L EROSION CONTROL MEASURES TO BE PROIDLD FOR ALL EXITING AND PROPOSED DRAINAGE CARPOOLING/VANIPOILING TO '08 SITE, MINIM] ZINIG MATERiALS PACKING BEFORE ARRIVAL TO JOB S]TEr STRUCTURES W]TH[N THE PROJECT UM[TS. REDUCING MATERIAL/RESOURCE INEFF/]ENC[ES BY COOR[)*AING WORK. 12. SOIL COMPACTION BENEATH PAVEMENTS, STEPS, WALLS AND LIGHT FOUNDATIONS SHAU BE 95% PROCTOR DENSITY M[NIMUM, UNLESS OTHERWISE SPECIFIED, 9, CONSTRUCTION STAGINGAND PHASING SHALL OCCUR, WHERE APPICAILE,TO MINIMIZE SOIL 23. IF SJTE WORK I DELAYED DUE TO ANY CIRCUMSTANCE; THE CONTRACTOR SHALL PROTEC PREPARED DISTURBANCE T[ME. PLANT BEDS FROM EROSION. 13. GRADING AND EXCAVATION WORK SHALL BE COMPLETED DURING DRY AND NON-FREEZING WEATHER CONDITIONS. 10 .51 MANAGEMENT PRACTICES (.Mps) SHALLBE ADJUSTED AS NEEDED TO MEET ANY OTHER UNFORESE[N 24. EXISTING TREES TO BE PRESERVED SHALL BEAR SAME RELATIONSHIP TO FINiSHED GRADE AS THEY BEAR CONDITIONS. TO PRE-CONSTRUCTION GRADE. 14. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL REMOVE AND STOCKPILE TOPSOil FOR REUSE ON-SITE. SOIL S./ BE SCREENED TO REMOVE ROCKS AND BOLLDERS. 11. THE GENERAL CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FOR INSTALL]NG A MUD TRACKING PAD/WASHING PAD AT 25. EX] STING TREES TO BE PRESERVED SHALL BE PROTEJED WITH STURDY, WEATHERPROOF FENCING AT A THE CONSTRUCT]ON ENTRANCES TO M]NlMIZE MUD DE1ACHMENT ~ROM TRUCK TIRES 1-1/2 INCH MINIMUM FOURM)rEETHEIGHTINSTALLEDNOCLOSER TOTHETREETRl,NKTHAN ITS DRIPUNE. THIS 15. IF STRUCTURAL SOIL IS FOUND ON-S]TEr THE CONTRACTOR SHALL REUSE. SCREENED ROCK TO BE PLACED ON M[RAF1 140-N FILTER FABRIC. ADDinONAL CLEAN GRAVEL TO BE FENCE SHAU BE MAINIAINED IN WORKING ORDER DURING ALL PHASES OF CONSTRUCT]ON MA]NTAIN ADDED THROUGHOUT THE DUR./N OF CONSTRUC]lON AS NEEDED. TREE PROTECTION ZONES FREE OF WEEDS AND TRASH. 16. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL PREVENT SOIL L05' TO Â¥ IND AND WATER EROSION. PRO JECT NO: 12. CONTRACTOR SHALL AB[DE BY THE LOCAL, STATE AND FEDERAL JURISDICTIONS AND GOVERNING 21406 26. NOWORKSHALLBECONDUCTE[>Wlâ„¢INTHED.PUNE UNLESSREVIEWEDANDAPPROVEDSYTHE . THE CONTRACTOR SHALL PROVIDE POS[TIVE DRAINAGE AWAY FROM AU STRUCTURES. 800]LIAGENCIES CONSTRUCTRON MANAGEMENT PLAN REQUIREMENTS. DWG FILE LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT. ALL WORK APPROVED WITHIN THE DRIPLINE SHALL BE COMPLETED BY HAND. BG L SERIES SKY HOTELd,g PROTECT ROOT SYSTEMS FROM PONDING [HODIN G OR Â£ *Ct SSIVE Wl 111NG 18. T HE GENERAL CONTRACTOR SHALL UNS IALL & MAINTAIN 1 EMPORARY DRAi NAGE DEVICES DUI NG 13, RESEED AS INDIATED IN SEED;NG NOTES. CONSTRUCT]ON 27. THEPROJECTUM"OFCONSTRUCTIONANDALLEXISTING'EGETATIONTOREMAINISTOBECLEARLY SHEETTITLE DEANED BY STURDY, WEATHERPROOP FENCING AT A MiNIMUM OF FOUR (4) FEET HIGH. 19. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL VERIFY Al CONTROL PONITS, FINISH FLOOR ELEVAI[ONS & PROP05ED SPOT NOTES ELEVATIONS WITH LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT PR~OR TO FORMWCRK INSTALLATION. 26. WATERPROOFING OF 5UBGRADE AND ODIER ARCH]TECTURAL SPACES BELOW AND/OR ADJACENT TO IMPROVEMENTS DESIGNED BY THE LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTE TO BEADEQUATELY DESIGNED AND DETAILED BY OTHERS TO PERMANENTLY REPEL ALL WATER SOURCES INCLUDING, BUT NOT UMUTED TO. PRECIPITATION, SNOW MELT. STORM WATER RUNOFF, GROUND WATER, IRR'GATIONr ROOF RUNOFFr GROUND WATERr AND PLUMBING LEAKS. SCALE: 29 STRUCTURAL DESiGN TO SUPPORT IMPROVEMENTS DES]GNED BY THE LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTAND LOCATED ABOVE, BELOW, AND/OR ADJACENT TO SUBGRADE AND OTHER ARCHITECTURAL SPACES ]S THE L001 - RESPONISIOILnY OF THE STRUCTURAL ENGINEER. THE STRUCTURAL DESIGN SHOULD BE ADEQUATELY DESIGNED TO SUPPORT ALL POSSIBLE LOADS INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO: BACKFIL' COMPACTION PLANT1NGS~ HARDSCAPES, RETAINING AND FREESTANDING SITE WALLSr AND CONSTRUCTION MATER~ALS/EQUIPMENT/ACTIVII #10 1- rowland+brc , i SEEDING NOTES IRRIGATION NOTES SITEWORK ABBREVIATIONS ara)~Wi/ufba,]design 234*M }830*/,1 .200 1 ALL NEWLY REGRADED SLOPES TO BE REVEGETATED IN THE FOLLOW]NG MANNER: 1. IRRIGATION PLAN IS CONCEPTUAL: FURTHER DESIGN TO BE COMPLETED BY IRRIGATION APPROX APPROXIMATE M[N MINIMUM ==6011 dar- co 60202 303.308.1~730 CONTRACTOR/DESIGNER. ARCH ARCHITECT MISC MISCELLANEOUS 970.644.34731 :103008.1375 f 2 MINIMUM SIX (6) INCHES OF TOPSOIL TO BE PLACED lN AREAS TO RECEIVE SEED: TOPSOIL TO BE GOOD AVG AVERAGE MTD MOUNTED CLEAN ORGAN[C 501(FREE OF WEEDSAND ROCKE. 2. ]RRIGATION SY5TEM SHALLOE DESIGNED TOCON5ERVE WATER TOTHE EXTENT POSSIBLE THROUGH THE .B BALLED AND BURLAP MTL METAL USE OF EFF]CIENT HEADS, MICROCUMATE-SPECIFIC ZONES AND A WEATHER AND MOISTURE K BOTTOM OF CURB NIC NOTIN CONTRACT 3. SEED MIXTURES AND FERT.ZER SHALLBE APPIED PER THE GOVERNING JURISDICTIONS' MONITORING CONTROL STATION. 9 BONOM OF FOOTING NO NUMBER REQUIREMENTS. . BENCHMARK NOM NOMINAL 1 ALL NEW TREES AND SHRUBS TO RECEIVE DRIP-r(PE IRRIGATION, 8W BOTTOMOFWAL. NTS NOTTOSCALE 4. ALL 5EED MU5T BE CERTIFIED WEED FREE. NO SEED CAN CONTAIN ANY SPEC]ES ON THE CITY COIN. BRG BRING OC ON CENTER OR STATE NOXIOUS WEED LISTS. SEED MIXES SHALL HAVE THE CERTIFIED SEED BLUE TAG OR SOURCE 4. ALL REVEGETATED AREAS TO RECEIVE SPRAY-TYPE ]RRIGAION FOR FIRST TWO GROWING SEASONS CL C'INTERIM OD OUTSIDE DIAMETER IDENT]FIED SEED (YELLOW TAG). ONLY SEED WnH A COMPLETE ANALYSIS LABEL ON THE BAG AND A MINIMUM. CAL CAUPER OP? OPPOSITE CURRENT GERMINATION TEST CONDUa ED 87 AN ACCREDITED LABORATORY WILL BE ACCEPTED. C. CAPACI. PA PLANTING AREA Con,ullan~ 5. AU PERENNIAL BEDS TO RECEIVE SPRAY...IRRIGATION. CHAM CHAMFER PAR PARALLEL 5. SEEDING SHALL OCCUR IN THE EARLY SPRING AND LATE FALL: SEEDING SHALL NOT BE DONE WHEN THE C[P CAST [N PLACE POB POINTOFBEGINN]NG GROUND IS FROZEN. FOR WARM SEASON SPECIES. SEED]NG ]N LATE SPRING OR EARLY SUMMER IS MORE 6 ALL SPRAY TYPE .RlGATIN TO BE DIRECTED AWAY FROM 5. UCTURES. O CONTROL JOIN 1 POC POINTOF CURVATURE L[KELY TO ACCOMPANY TEMPERATURES WARM ENOUGH TO SUPPORT GERMINATiON. SEED THE SITE AS CLR CLEARANCE PERF PERFORATED :22&~KAirtfp2%%'50,1,2,2,%:iU&%yÂ©in:2~1Z:22%,ffWON AND WEED 7. INSTALL SPRAY HEADS ALONG SIDEWALKS ON POP-UP RISERS. ::'I I'l'.'.A./ 7/ 252:TE.=ON bluegreen ACCOMPLISHED, SOILS SHALL NOT REMA1N UNPROTECTED. 8. LOCATE HEADS SOTHEYARE PROTECTED FROM TRAVEL AND DO NOTCAUSE WATER TO FALL ON PAVED, CONC CONCRETE PL PROPERTY LINE 300 5 spring st ~ulte 70~ 0 ap M.INRY, OR OTHER ARCHITECTURAL SURFACES. CONSTR CONSTRUCCON . PO]NT, P.NIT OF TANGENCY 970.429.7499 0 6. UNLESS OTHERWEE NOTED, HAND BROADCAST OF SEED SHALL BE USED ON AU SLOPES. INCLUDING CONT CONTINUOUS .C POLYVINYLCHLORiDE 970.429.949. THOSE THAT ARE STEEP (GREATER THAN 3:1), EXTREMELY RIC., REMOTE OR INACCEBBLE. SEED 9. ADJUST HEAD LOCATION IF SPRAY E DETRIMENTAL TO OR BLOCKED BY TREE, SHRUB OR STRUCTURE CONTR CONTRACOR PVMT PAVEMENT w-,.NuBgreenasoen.em RATE WILL VARY PER SEED MIXTURE SPECFIED. BROADCAST SEEDING REQUIRES DOUBLE CR TRIPLE THE MAINTAINING EVEN COVERAGE OF PLANTING AREAS. CU CUBIC PVR PAVER SEED]NG RATE OF DRILL SEEDING AND CAL[BRAT]ON OF SEEDING RATES / LE5S PREISE THAN 'll " CUBIC FEET QNTY QUANTIT'f DRILL SEEDING. SOILS TO BE RAKED OR HARROWED TO EUM[NATE CRUSTING BEFORE ACCEPTING 10. GENERAL CONTRACTOR TO COORDINATE SIZE AND LOCAT[ON Of SLAB PEN.W.. .R IRRIGATION DBL DOUBLE R RADIUS BROADCAST SEED. CARE SHALL 8E TAKEN TO ENSURE UN]FORM COVE.GE (EVEN SEED APPUCATION EQUIPMENT WITH MECHAN'CAL CONTRACTORS. DF DIRECTION OF FLOW' RECEP RECEPTACLE RATES) OVER THE AREA AND SEEDING SHAU NOT OCCUR DURING WINDY WEATHER. DEG DEGREE REF REFERENCE 11. INSTALL MAIN LINES TO SLOPE AT 1% MIN[MUM TO MANUAL DRAIN VALVES LOCATED AT LOW POINTS OF DEMO DEMOUSH, DEMOLITION REINF REINFORCED 7. HAND RAKE SEED INTO TOPSOI NO MORE THAN 3/4 'CH DEEP TO COVER. SOIL / SEED CONTACT IS MAIN SYSTEM. DTL DETA]L REM REMOVE CRI'CAL FOR GROWTH. DWG DRAW]NG REQD REQUIRED 166. 12. [N'TALL]/41NCH POLYETHYLENELATERALINES.SLOPEAT 1%/]N]MUM TOAUTOMAK DRAIN EA EACH REV REVIS]ON, REVISED 8. DRILL SEED]NG' WHEN INDICATED ON DRAWINGS' MAY BE APPROVED BY LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT ON VALVES LOCATED AT LOW POINTS OF LATERAL SYSTEMS. Ej EXPANNON JO]NT ROW RIGHT OFWAY 07.14.15 SLOPESOF3:10RFLATTER, BUT NOT 1NAREAS .EXTREMELYROC.5011. SEEDTOADEPTHOF 1/4 EL ELEVATION SAN SAN"ARY PLANNED DEVELOPMENT TO 1/2]NCH. DRILTUBESPACING SHOULDBE SIX {6)To SEVEN{7)[NCHES. SEEDINGSHOULD BE 11 TRENCHESTOBEOFSUFFICIENT DEPTITOPROVIDE 18[NCHESOFCOVEROVERITERALUNES ELEC ELECTRICAL SCH SCHEDULE DETAILEDREVIEWAPPUCATION CONDUCTED ALONG lHE SLOPES CONTOUR TO AVOID EROSION FROM WATER FLOWING DOWN DRILL SLEEVED LINES SHALL HAVE A 14]NIMUM COVER OF 24 INCHES. TRENCHES ARE TO BE OACKFILLED W~TH ENG ENGINEER " STORM DRAIN FURROWS. SEEDINGRATETO BE SIX (6)TOTEN (10) PURE LiVE SEED LBS PER ACRE. MATERIAL FREE OF ROCKS GREATER THAN 3/4 INCHE5 IN DIAMETER, EQ EQUAL SEC SECT]ON EQUIP EQU]PMENT 'F SQUARE FOOT(FEET) 9. HYDROSEEDING' WHEN INDICATED ON DRAW'NGS, SHALL BE SPRAYED ON A ROUGHENED SLOPE USING A 14, iNSTALL BACKFLOW PP.EVENTOR(S) IN /(}ORD114,AnON W[TH GENERAL CONTRACOR. BACKFLOW EST ESTIMATE SHT SHEET HYDROSEEDING MACH[NE AND SHALL eE USED TOREACH AREAS THATAREINACCESSIBLE BY BROADCAST PREVENTORS SHALL BE IN5TALLED PLUMB AND SQUARE WITH ADJACENT PAVEMENT EDGES OR EW EACH WAY S[M SIMILAR METHODS. USE TO BE LIMITED TO STEEPGREATER THAN 3:1),]NACCESS'LE 5LOPES IN AREAS WITH STRUCURES. COLOR, BLACK EXIST EXISTING SNT SEAL.ANT ADEQUATEAND DEPENDABLE MO]STURE DURINGTHE GROWING SEASON. HYDROMULCHING MUST OCCUR EXP EXPANSION, EXPOSED SPECS SPEC]F]CATIONS AS A SEPARATE PROCESS AFTER HYDROSE.... DO NOT M]X SEED AN' MULCH TOGETHER ]N ONE 15. CONTROL VALVE BOX AND HEAD 80. LOCATIONS TO BE APPROVED BY LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT PRIOR TO FFE ANISH FLOOR ELEVATION SQ SQUARE WATER APPWCATiON PROCESS AS THIS WIU PREVENT SEEDS FROM COMING ]NTO CONTACT W]111 THE INSTALLAT[ON. COLORJ BLACK. FG FIN[SHED GRADE STA 5TATI0N soic FIN FIN[S~' STD STANDARD 16 '112 FINAL LOCA 1 ]ON AND EXACT POSITION ING OF THE AUTOMAT]C CONTROLLER SHALL BE APPROVED BY FL FLOW INE 5TL STEEL 10. THE S]TE MUST BE MULCHED WITH WEED-FREE MULCH (HAY OR HYDROMULCH) AFTER SEEDING. THE OWNERS A HORZED REPRESENTATIVE OR GENERAL CONTRACTOR PRIOR TO iNSTALLATION. FOC FACE OF CONCRETE STRL STRUCTURAL FS FlNISHSURFACE SYM 5YMMETRICAL 11. HAY MULCH MUST BE WEED.FREE. HAY TO BE ~CRIMPE[y ]NTO THI SOIL SURFACI BY HAND ON STEE' 17. VALIE BOXES SHALL BE INSTALLED FLUSH W]TH FINISH GRADE AND AUGN VALVE 80XES WITH ADJACENT . FOOT T&B TOP AND BOTTOM SLOPE ON FLAT SURFACES A MODIFIED DISC PloW MAY BE UTILIZED TO JAM THE HAY STEMS INTO THE PAVEMENT EDGES OR STRUCTURE5, VALVE BOXES SHALL BE OF PLASTIC WITH BOLT DOWN LID. FTG FOOTING Te Top OF CURB SOIL TO REDUCE SURFACE WIND SPEEDS AND SOIL DESICCAION APPLY ATTME RATE DF 3,000 TO GA GAUGE TF TOP OF FOOTING Ir'ILIS PER ACRE(3360-4480!<G/~). ADDANORIANiC-BASEDTACK]FlERATTHEUTED,15'US 18 CONCEALALLIRRIGATION BOXES N PLANTING BEDS WHERE APPICABLE AND COVER W]TH MULCH. GAL GALVAN'ZED THK â„¢ICK PER ACRE 10 PREVENT EROS]ON. VALVE BOXES TO BE PLACED A MINIMUM OF 12 INCHES FROM AND PARALLEL TO CURBS AND WALKS. GC GENERAL CONTRAOOR TOPO TOPOGRAPHY GROUPED VALVES TO BE EQUALLY SPACED AND PARALLEL. COLOR, BLACK. GEN GENERAL TS TOP OFSTEP 12. HYDROMULCH MUST BE APPLIED SEPARATELY FOLLOW]NG SEED APPL[CATiON. DO NOT OVERSPRAY AS HORIZ HORIZONTAL TP TOPOFPAVEMENT/PAVER THE MAY RESULT I EROSION. AN ORGANIC TACKIFIER SHALL BE ADDED TO THE SLURRYTO ENHANCE 19. CONTRAJOR TOMAINTAIN A SET OF-AS-Bulll- DRAWINGS THROUGHOUTTHE COURSE OF HP HIGH POINT TW TOP OF WALL THE DURAS[LITYOFTHE APPL]ED MULCH COVER APPLYAT A RATE OF 30000 LBSPERACRE (3360 KG/HA). CONSTRUCTION, AND DELIVER THESE DRAWINGS TO OWNER S REPRESENTATIVE & LANDSCAPE HT HEIGHT TRAS TRANSFORMER ADD AN ORGANIC-BASED TACKIFIER AT THE RATE OF 150 LBS PER ACRE TO PREVENT EROSION. ARCHITEC UPON COMPUETION OF WORK, I IDE DJAMETER TR TOP Of RAMP iNV INVERT ELEVATION .9 TYPICAL 13. SEEDED AREAS SHALL BE MAINTAINED FREE OF WEEDS, THU5 ALLOWING THE DESIRED VEGETATION TO 20. EXCAVATIONS TO BE BACKFILLED TO 95% COMPACTIN, MINIMUM. CONTRACTOR TO REPAIR SETTLED m INCHES VAR VARIES THR:VE WITHOUT THE CROWDING TENDENC1ES OF AGGRESSIVE WEEDS. TRENCHED FOR ONE YEAR AFTER COMPLETION OF WORK. CONTRACTOR TO WARRANT THAT THE SYSTEM INCL INCLUDED VERT VERTICAL WIU BE FREE FROM DEFECE ]N MATERIAL AND WORKMANSH[P FOR A PERIOD OF ONE YEAR AFTER IRR IRRIGATION VEH VEHICLE COMPLETIONOFWORK. F JOINT VOL VOLUME LIN LINEAR ./ WiTH 21. EXERCISE EXTREME CARE IN EXCAVATINGAN'WORKING NEAR EXISTINGUTIL[TIESAND ]N EXISTING LAND LANDSCAPE W/0 WITHOUT TREE ROOT ZONES. VERIFY THE LOCATION AND COND]TION OF ALL UTIUT.. AND BE RESPONSIBLE FOR . LOW PO~NIT WT WEIGHT DAMAGE TO ALL UTILIT]E& DAMAGE CAUSED BY OR DURING THE PERFORMANCE OF WORK TO 8E LT LIGHT ./F WELDED WIN[ FABRIC REPAIRED AT NO ADDmONAL COST TO THE OWNER FIELD ADJUST SPR]NKLER LOCAT]ONS SO AS TO MATL MATERIAL .0 YARD AVOIDCONFICTS'/HUrILITIES(FIREHYDRANTS~TRA.SFORMERSr.C.). . MAX MAXIMUM ./8 MEMBRANE 22. FLUSH AND ADJUST SPRINKLER HEADS FOR OPTIMUM PERFORMANCE. THI SHALL INCLUDE THROTTLING .11 MAÂ·1~Â¢OLE THE FLOW CONTROL AT EACH VALVE TO OBTAIN THE OPTIMUM OPERATING PRESSURE FOR EACH SYSTEM. SKY HOTEL 23. IRRIGAT ION SYSTEM TO 8E COMPLETELY DRAINED TO PROTECT PIPE FROM BURSTING PR~OR TO FREEZING TEMPERATURESANNUALLY 24. PROVIDE SLEEVES AS REQUIRED FOR IRRIGAnON LINES. ]RRIGATION SYSTEMS SHALL BE CONSTRUCTED PRIOR TO PAVING AND LANDSCAPE WORK. 709 E. DURANT AVENUE ASPEN CO 81611 PROJECT NO: I.,6 DWG FILE, BG L SERIES SKY HOTELd.g ... - SHEETTITLE NOTES SCALE: L002 4 -- --te!2~52.- *9Ed $ .7 /3 DURANTSTREET LEGEND EX;ST]NG DEODUOUSTREE rowland+broughton ar)X....,1 design/ n~en..g,? EXN.GEVERGREEN TREE :im=6011 -H.m ,~ %\\ .-1 /Â·1 .., 303.30813730 234 0 hopk~, ave 18)m.M $02(Q 970.544./73 f d V |~ lk. L .1 411 1 - - C X TREE TO BE REMOVED 1/ #4 17' ,..rl .0,9:Â·' - u PROPE.'(NE ./ Â· 5'1 Â· 17-=UA 9-1 Â«=...441. ..11. r=.-r =F+441411 - i. n Â·4 Codan' 1 BO - 7,1 i 1 vin: POSITION t5'EDULE 7 t 1 ~3 (171 +444 .1*4 1,) 1. Â· ' ; 1 4 . REMOVE $514.96 aip..8!611 bluegreen 300 I ./.st . 202 CHATEAU : CHATEAU 2 a DEC REMOVE $1816.00 970.429.94991 DUMONT CHAUMONT 3 10.5 El REMOVE $3548.00 www.bluegreenaspen,com 0 9~4 9 ~W U. 1 4 1 DEC REMOVE 0 6 2.5Â· DEC REMOVE 0 5 3.V DEC REMOVE 0 J /$ ; 7 2.5' DEC REMOVE 0 8 U DEC REMOVE 0 " ' 9 10.5- El REMOVE $3548,40 10 e DEC REMOVE 0 07.14.15 REMOVE 0 i :12 P DEC REM VE 0 DETAILED REVIEWAPPICATION ~ PLANNED'EVELOPMFINT < ~ 1 1 13 10.5- EG REM IE $3548.40 14 26.5 DEC NON EXISTING 0 1 L 2Â·94-â€¢ * 1 1 15 24.5Â· DEC REM VE 0 1 1 ' 1 1 41-rÂ· 2 1 -177- 1 : 16 8 DEC REM VE 0 17 7.5- EG REM VE 0 4-11 , E 18 f DEC REM VE $11S8.66 E-r ' Â·-19 22Â» DEC REM VE $15577.54 1 1 1 t] 1 ~ L iff L -- - -fiff I U U 1 1 4- -FL I - 1 F----F--F 20 8.9 . REM IE 0 21 10- EG REM VE $3218.50 22 7Â· EG REM VE O / 13 6 1 /24 1 ALLEY 23 W EG REM IE $3218.50 Â·, 1 24 6 EG REM VE 0 25 5 . REM VE 0 .F .h 26 15" EG REM VE $7241.63 '._,ru- t-9 1-1Â¢r/tr ~ 28 6.5" EG REM IE O 29 9Â· DEC REI IE 0 30 8 DEC REM VE 0 31 I DEC OF ROPER. NOT APPLICABLE 32 9.5- DEC OF ROPERTY NOT APPLICABLE 69#r .~r, t dj , 4*ZL 2 r-9 Inl 1/.ff , ./.. ; GLORY HOLE 33 7.5~ EG . /1 0 .%". CONDOMINIUMS 34 9 EG RE VE 0 54- 35 2.5Â· EG RE VE 0 '' 14 4-1 - H 1-1 L 140 . 5.9 El RE VE 0 37 5" EG RE) ie O I - -~ U 38 4.5- EG W VE 0 b 39 4.5~ EG REI. VE 0 40 55 20 REâ€¢ VE 0 7 7-1Â» Er-1.-.f-[73/- 0-0-1,Â·- r-1-3-3.-n -ri-- : -- 217-7,-41 42 - EG 1186 VE 0 SKY HOTEL 41 5.F EG RD VE 0 7 43 10.5 EG REI, VE 0 h - - - 44 3 . REI . 0 .~ 1,% 45 11- EG REk VE 0 46 6' EG m VE 0 47 6.5" EG REIÂ· VE 0 0 PRIVATE 48 UNKNOWN EG RD VE ? 709 E. DURANT AVENUE RESIDENCE 49 15- El R. VE $7241.63 ASPEN, CO 81611 \; .91. ,.-- --=_-- 26-iri Ihlâ€¢Â·T,114-maLLyr77 ~491~\145 ,'--F?9- 50 5.5- DEC RD VE 0 ,>0 MA#& A,Adf/4 UZG 620*2\=p'M \ /4 1% \ DEC RE VE 52 15.5Â· . RE VE $7732.- 53 I EG RE,~uVE $8239.36 $3218.50 \ \ \ \ \ 3 1 \ \ \ \ TOTAL VALUE $66r632Â·93 ' PROPERTY UNE 4\~ /1.-11\\-s % \X 4 / 1~~1 NORTH 24-- PROJECT NO: - 2 1. 4 21406 1 :74, ~.4 f DWG FILE. 2 1 4 BG L SERIES Sin' HOTEL d. ' ASPEN ALPS CONDOMINIUMS SHEET TmE T L TREE MITIGATION PLAN ID _<- ~ SCALE:-~~ ' -- L100 - i / -~ / -*% N. ./ 32533-- PRELIMINARY iM.u'. n .. NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION . -- SOUT#I SPRING STREET 99/d LINE..i-~ i#., DURANT STREET LEGEND ~ ---- PROPERTY UNE rowland+brc I \\\ 234*avie 1830 bleke s[ sÂ·0 200 /---/@F=21\ \ \ \ arch,*clure/uÂ®aildemgn aspe~,co 8161~ \\\\ 970.U.3473 f 303.308.1375' 970.544.90060 303.308.1~73/ 1 ----41.\- 4- -\ \ NOTES 1, LAYOUT DIMENSIONS ARE FROM THE BACK OF CURB UNLESS OTHERWISE STATED. - 2+ REFER TO CIVIL DRAWINGS FOR AU EASEMENTS 9- T Â· PROPERn U:EN'- ANDSETBACKS * Consullant, 31 I I. I Li 300 s ~p.g st sul~- 202 bluegreen DUMONT 97042994991 CHATEAU L a.en . 81611 J : 970.429.7499 0 ~-,bluegrenspenÂ£om 11-1\.1 07.14.15 PLANNEDDEVELDPMENT DETAILEDREVIEWAPPICAION - 9.1- J[ , 33 vi ALLEY ILL PROPERTY UNE fy--- 'i km~_ 28-: 6- b PLANTER Tion L I - 1 -- U GLORYHOLE CONDOMINiUMS J 9 -3 4 - i 6=024 2 hf - E 1. El_,P- l_[L L LL--J ~L--0 -ir L 2 --- -7 7-3-/.''U-1-\. F-rT7.Â·- ful- r--Cri.79 TO-ly- 1-0 -7 - 7 ; SKY HOTEL f tq~ : - 1 PRIVATE RESIDENCE 709 E. DURANT AVENUE ASPEN CO 81611 ~ rT--- \\\ \ 2 \\ \ 4 ' ' \ PRMPERTY UAE \ : C li'T]NG'LPS PAR r \ \4 \\\\\\\9 \3\\1\ ,\\ mb 11 ' -ORTH 6(/ 4// Â·r b Â·~~ Nx ~...1.Â·. re---- - Â· ~ PROJECT NOÂ· t: h P.#1. / ; 8 i : DWG FILE. , B. L SERIES SKY HOTELdwg ' STREET LEVEL ASPEN ALPS CONDOMINIUMS i ~ SHEET~ f / LAYOUT PLAN 1 SCALE: 0 8 16 - - r 1 L 11 1 i 3 + t-- ..1 -M L200 / / 57:3--- PRELIMINARY 8 j NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION 2- = - 4 SOUTH SPRtNG STREET 99Zd DbRANT STREET LEGEND " "3~ 8ENCH INTEGRATED INTO - - - - PROPERTY 1 DIE .-. SCT[ WALL: LESSTHAN I Â£ I - - 1/4" MINUS EXPOSED a,d;decluJe i uJbail de~gn /,D~i;o. de&,0 rowland +broughton PROPOSED ACA RAMP K- 231291 I \, , 1 1234,hopkhsave 1830.ka 61 0200 [ 1, ON STREET ..r.I:1~J0 OTAU.5 u -Â·f ~Â· AGGREGATE CONCRETE XI* BIKE RACK: MOVABLE il,Â·ISED r[ANT[n,iISS SIC:= 3- ----' 1\ \ \ THAN 30-TALL aspe,1 2 81611 Cenâ€ž1 - 20~2 970.544 9006 0 .08// 0 PERVIOUS PAVERS- BOLLARD .0.4.3473' .,03,30&1375f 92[1 1 - -1- -) PROPOSED ADA RAMP .NOWMELT I ASPHALT - "GNAGE/.RANDING PROI)05[D ADA [~1,~r I 71 1 ' PROili SCRECNV.#L UE5S THAN 30 .r - 1 1.1 ~ = GRASS-CRETE RAISED PLAI'l< L- LES'THAN 30- TALL I M - T=-7- R AREA ...1./. AT GRADE PLANnNG SED TRANSITION F248 ROLL . m.N'* bluegreen f E 300&,Mng. iulte 2. CHATEAU aspen,~0 81611 \ DUMONT -,bluegreenaspen.em ...34\ 970429 94/1 '28*' L\--5 I . ' RAISED PLAN1ER FLUSH RICDON CUÂ® L J 1= 1.-.1 418-1 GRASSÂ·CRETEAREA 07.14.15 ROLLCURID : 4- 1 E H-Â·- 1 DETA~LED REVIEWAPPLICATION 9 kip 1 1 1- - M lk- U-- ~ , 1- ~ ~ 7- Ed ~ ~ 1 ] ~ ~- - i j I I - MEDIANICAL AIR Will _ 0, . 1:==1 1 - 97--3:i = CUR' CUT 8 9 GRATE 24.: DROP OFr PARK1NGAND IL ' ' i U 330 r-1 U immw VALET SERV~CE AREA : LL-4_1-11 , 1 - 4-- 14--0 j/-ic - mi- 5---1= - L - ALLEY aID L.-. L - PROPFR. 9 - - - 1 r=- -- PUNTER , r-i m 1-9,1 -1 11 \ 1 -*Ii -1 =22 -3 1 +7 + GLORY HOLE CONDOMINIUMS -rimA 1 1 8.It ET 1 =91. 19- 4 n LÂ·. . rl h ./1 rl h . r Ll--*--- 9---11 L j L--1 :-rcr.Â·- r-EL - ,-1 4, r]-3 ,-i ,-E r--TT*1 - _ - 4,1 : SKY HOTEL red-[116CCD tÂ·-41 --F 1 U-- --- PROPOS[D ADA RAL" A t .---1.,f r,//- 1 709 E. DURANT AVENU CONTINUATION Or PUGLIC ASPEN. CO 81611 \ 44\ SIDEWAI K TO SECOND 0*&- 1--W"= *'9 -=k;i I- p ===1~~ (( -mn- Ti~i-=-n ---M ---:r Ii-, -' -11 -R_IL= PRIVATE RESIDENCE FLOOR TERRACE/PUBUC ACCESS ta===%.1 MUL // f 1~Â¥ 1 3 Ag .7. i 4 PLANTING BED I /1 -1 ~ PROPER \ PROPOICD ADA RAI,r - 1 .f Â£ F.:+4-ic--- _1Â·Ow-__._.-,-..._._ _ : - NORTH - PROPOSED CURB CUT - ------ - -- / , PROJECTNO 1 PLANTING BED 4 I / W."INTERS: LESS 1 DWG FILE THAN 30Â» TALL : , BG i SERIES sriÂ· HOTEL.dwg i ASPEN ALPS CONDOMINIUMS / SHEET TRLE " PROPOS[6%'CAIWIr __ m STREETLEVEL 1 MATERIALS PLAN , 1 - / SCALE: Url< t -- : 4y I .;' L300 - 279230 Â» j \ r%. ' PRELIMINARY NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION A \ \ . 4 I Â» 1 Z9Ed a.RrYLiNE LEGEND SPACING SYMBOL ADDR. COMMONNAME DOTANICALNAME SIZE SPACING SYMBOL ABBR. COMMON NAME BOTANICAL.NAME SiZE TREES PERENmAL PLANTING ,UtEAS rowland+brc , i A Pt QUAKING AspEN POPULUS TREMULOIDES 16 PER PLAN a~*fu~ fuftai des,g,1 16 PER PIAN 234e~....al 1830 blake I. g200 LIÂ» 0. ORANGE YELLOW HUES 2000 5, 20Â· PER PLAN ORANGES AND LEMONS GAILLARDIA 4FANFARE BLAZE' . GAL 4 PLANTS' 100/ aspen. 81611 dan~0, co 80202 BLANKETFLOWER 970.5429Clo 303.3081971 0 Af AUTUMN BLAZE MAPLE ACER X FREEMAN]i AUTUMN 16' PER PLAN MOUNTAIN 8Ag<ET OF GOLD ALYSSUM MON'ANUM .GAL. 4 PLANTS" loOsf 970.544/73' 303.3(11375' BLAZE 18 PER PLAN 'MOUNTAIN GOLD' Y YELLOW HUE5 2000 sf 0 h SIENNAGLEN MAPLE ACER X FREEMANII SIENNA 14' PER PLAN - MOONSH[NEYARROW ACHILLEA MOONSHINE #1 GAL. 4 PLANTS / 100'f GLEN CUSION SPURGE LUPHORIA POLYCHROMA #1 GAL. 4 PLANTS" 100/ KANNAH CREEKSULPHUR ER]OGONUM UM8ELLATUM #1 GAL. 4 PLANTS / 100sf Pt ROCIO( MOUNTAIN ACER GRANDIDENTATUM 3.L. PER PLAN FLOWER KANNAH CREEK .I]S GLOWMAPLE ROCIOÂ· MOUNTAIN GLOW 5- CAL. PER PLAN C.1 Pac AUTUMN PURPLEASH FRAXINUS AMERICANA 3 CAL PER P# [2* Gv GROUNDCOVE. &VINES 2000 sf HOP VINE HUMULUS LUPULUS # 1 GAL. 4 PLANTS / 100.1 AUTUMN PURP' 5-CAL PER PLAN NEOMEXICANUS CREEPINGSPEEDWELL vERO.Ch WATERPERRN BLUE' #1 GAL. 4 P~Na 10Ds' 0 b~uegr~ WOOLLY THYME THYMUS PARECOX # 1 GAL. 4 PLANTS / 100.1 C Y Pal SPRING SNOW CRABAPPLE MALUS 'SPRING SNOW' 3 CAL. PER PLAN 300 s spring st sulle 202 PSEUDOLANUGINOSUS' ..nce ..1 5-CAL. PER PLAN 970,429.7499 0 970429.9499' e Pac NARROWLEAF COTTONWOOD POPULUS ANGUST[FOLIA 3- CAL. PER PLAN yâ„¢~,bluegieenaspeD{- 'CREEKSIDE 5- CAL PER PUN NOTE 1. PLANT SPECES, SIZE, SPAC[NG, AND QUANT[T]ES ARE SUBJECT To CHANGE SHRUBS RaG GREEN MOUND CURRANT R[BESALPINUM'GREEN .5 PER PLAN MOOND' 07.14.15 PLANNED DEVELOPMENT FaF TALL FERNLEAF BUCKTHORN FRANG:/ ALNUS FINE UNE #15 PER PlAN DETAILED REV]EWAPPLICAnON CsA ARCTIC ARE DOGWOOD CORNUS SERICEAARCTIC *15 PER PLAN FIRE CaB BUD'S YELLOW DOGWOOD CORNUS AL8A BUD S .5 PER PLAN YELLOW' IM BLOODTWIGDOGWOOD CORNUS SANGU]NEA '15 PER PLAN MIC>WINTER FIRE' GRASSES e Mss NARROW LEAF MISCANTHUSSINENS' #15 PER PLAN MADEN GRASS 'SARA.ANDE 5sP PRAIRIE BLUESUTTLE SCHJZACHYRIUM SCOPARIUM #15 PER PLAN BLUESTEM 'PRAIRIE BLUES' SILKY SPIKE MELIGRASS ME'. CIUATA .5 PER PLAN 0 .1 VAR/GATED TUFTEDHAIR DE.CHAMP'A CESPITISA 8&8 PER PLAN GRAS5 'NORTHERN UGHTS' PERENNIAL PLANTING AREA5 O-. DEEP BLUE HUES 2000 sf PERENN]AL 8ACHELOR CENTAUREA MONTANA #1 GAL 4 PLANTS" 10051 8U.ON TIGER PENSTEMON PENSTEMON MENSARUM -GAL 4 PLANTS" 10Osf DWARF BLUE LARKSPUR DELPHIN~UM GRAND]FLORUM #1 GAL 4 PLANTS/ 10'f SKY HOTEL SUMMER NIGHTS Ch. MID BLUE HUES 2000 sf BLUE FORTUNE HYSSOP AGASTACHE Â·BLUE FORTUNE' :1 GAL 4 PLAN.5/ 100/ DWARF BLUEFLAG IRIS ]R[5 SETOSAARTICA # 1 GAL 4 PLANTS / 100/ UTTLE TRUDY CATM~NT NEPETA X UTTLE TRUDY #1 GAL 4 PLANTS" 1000 709 E. DURANT AVENUE BLUE-MAGENTAHUES 2000 sf ASPEN, CO 81611 PURPLE GAYFEATHER L[ATRISSPICATA'FLOR;STANViOLET' #1GAL 4 PLANTS' 1[Osf MAY NIGHTSALVIA SALVIA NEMOROSA MAY NIGHT' # 1 GAL 4 PLANTS/ 100sf PURPLE ROCKCRESS AUBRIETA DELTOIDEA #1 GAL. 4 PLANTS/ 100/ PURPLE GEM M MAGENTA HUES 2000 sf ECHINACEA PURPUREAÂ·RUBY AQUiLEGIACAERULEA /1 GAL 4 PLANTS/ 100sf STAR' GALLERY INK LUPINE LUMNUS 'GALLERY PINK' #1 GAL. 4 PLANTS' 100/ Ek-MR MAGENTA RED HUES 2000 s' ROSE CAMPION LYCHNISCORONARIA #1 GAL 4 P.A.5/ 100sf 'ASTROSANGU[NEA PRAIRIE WINECUPS CALLIRHOEINVOLUCRATA . GAL 4 PLANTS/ 100/ RED VALERIAN CENTRANTHUSRUBER #1GAL. 4 PLANTS/ 100sf PROJECT NO 21406 R RED 11UES 2000 5, DWG FILE. BG L SERIES SICÂ¥ HOTELdÂ»g MALTESECROSS LYCHmS CHALCEDOmCA #1 GAL. 4 PLANT5 / 100.f RED BEEBALM MONARDA 'CAMBRIDGE SCARLEr ~1GAL, 4 P.NTS / 10Osf SHEETTITLE RED CORALBELLS HEUCHERA SANGUINEA #1 GAL 4 P.NTS / 10/f PLANTING LEGEND 'SPLENDENS ~- Ro RED OUNGE HUES 2000 sf @CO[*~S)NTBRETIA 0200[IMICIRBF//S. BRADSHAW' 01 @AL, 4 FWNT# / 100Â§f CAUFORN1A FUSCHIA .AUSCINERIA GARRETTI #1 GAL 4 PLANTS / 1005' SCALE: ORANGE CARPEr 0 ORANGE HUES 2000 g L400 -I ORANGE DAYL]LY HEM[ROCALUS FULVA #1 GAL 4 PLANT5/ 100sf GAY BUTTERFLY ASCL[PlS TuaEROSA .1 GAI 4P 00/ --A.-= ORANGE GLOBE MALLOW SPHAERALCEAMUNROANA -GAL 4 PRELIMINARY s NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION 0 0 0 CO DURANTSTREET LEGEND Ati* *t SYMBOL DESCRIPTION/NAME .r ES 0 .\\\\ TYP. EVERGREEN OR DECIDUOUSTREE archrlec~Li,v /Lifbandesign/ nj~i,o~ ~ese] rowland+broughton p\ W D[CIDUOUSTREE PLANTING 234 e ~* * 18)0.~e t[ &:0 2DC a.en.. 816,1 dem.8r . iÂ©202 Â«AA\\\\\ 970.54//0 303.~8.1.30 970544 34/' 303,300,13754 PERENNIAL PLANTING AREAS U V (0 (2(03 -L E HARDY PERENNIAL AREAS PROP.74. SHRUB PLANTING Co~ullanis NOTE bluegreen 1 PLAN] SECIa SUE 5~1~ AND QUINTE,8 AE ~mET TO MANGE ~ ~ ~pnDs~e~ CHATEAU 970.429,7499 0 .penr. AI611 970429.94991 DUMONT .w*.bluegreenaspen.com d f Wi'.4 P[R[NlliAL rLWITING f .it.J Z - F I.*I 1 : 07.14.15 : PLANNED DEVELOPMENT DETAILED REV]EWAPPL]CATION 4 1 ~* th-U 3 i,11 lu--%-3 4 ii< Il =q (279'Â·-' 'mi.)-ji I ---ri- -1 r JI ALLEY 1 6 u I Uk I 9% 1 PROPER. LINE -mp-mil tr-6<4-J li r ~ b ~ ---Ii - -fuLL Ff 6 - ~ 727- -LIt-0 - 7 I. .Â£/' 12:J, Yft {\ r -- e~ L J L - jr-[3--1.,- f~-I]-3 .- F)-7 - F-E[~'---7.- -010- SKY HOTEL '1 R 7 1 ~ ~ -- 1 709 E. DURANT AVENU ASPEN,CO81611 --9-0 Y,A k -4 6 ExITING ALPS PARKING ~ 4- ' p'~OPERTY LAIE U---- --- --- . 1~~1 NORTH I I :., 6/ EVERGREEN TREE PLANTING : ~ PROJECT I ~ 21406 /6 3 DWG FILE. , : BGLSERIESSK/HOTEL.**g ASPEN ALPS CONDOMINIUMS ~ STREET LEVEL / S.FET... PLANTING PLAN SCALE Uf~-< L401 - PRELIMINARY EÂ·EEEad NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION 1----7-F I -1.JAI:. -- ff Al *''v 31 LEGEND 9 f -- < SYMBOL DESCRIPTION/NAME TREES Â» rowland+brc I ./ - ard......rb/:des, 234 GhÂ®k. a. 1830 blake sl ,0 200 .In. co 816Ii denver. ca 80202 970.W.9006' 303.3081373 0 ti--LERâ‚¬=al- 9709434/f 303'30&//f PERENNIAL PLANTING AREAS HARDY PERENNIAL AREAS 1-1 .- --- i~=A~ POOL LOUNGE NOTE ~ Â® 1. PLANT SPECIES, SIZE, SPACING, AND QUANTITIES ARE SUBJECTO CHANGE bluegreen aipen,co ./1 970,429.7499 0 970.4299499f w~.bluegreenaspen,corn 1 =- ---- 07.14.15 MANNEDDEVELOPMENT DETA]LEDREVIEWAPPOCAnON --1 - --- UPPER ....E -2 - '' ili Al LE'a; U â€¢IL tl-fm' lit, :.2/' i 1-/--7- - - =Er- _P -En C 5. 25 >FR m=[[ :- - 1, TYP. DEC]DUOUS rREE O F7 SHALLOW SEDUM TRAY Can,uilanl& - BAR/LOUNGE A--4(Â«ib ~2. -- ~LZIILL_IL_ -- -' ~ ~ UPPER , LEVEL in RAP--6*5111 >=p~ri Â·Â«~ 1 SKY HOTEL 1 / / / 709 E. DURANT AVENUE 11 E ASPEN, CO 81611 / 1-- -1 L LOWER LEVEL ROOF TERRACE \ \ 11111,2- A,-A- 4-9+1 - NORTH 62 9 0 W, PROJECTND 7- 21406 '' Vt,~) LOUNGEUY OWGFILE. BG L SERIES Slet HOTELd.g /- \ I PLANTING PLAN , ROOF LEVEL / -I'll SCALE: 0 8 16 L401-R f SECOND FLOOR TERRACE PRELIMINARY it NOT FOR CONSTRUCTIOW OZEd LANDSCAPE GUARANTEE: THE GUARANTEE E TO COVER THE COST TO STABILIZE THE ENTIRE SITE W~TH DURANT VEGE TATION (FOR EXAMPLE, SHOULD THE PROJECT FAa FHROUGH, THE CITY HAS THE RESOURCES TO STREET STABkIZE THE WTE AND THE C;TrIS NOT LEFT WITH ANUNSTABLE, DIRT24 rowland+broughton a,dideâ‚¬m,F/uÂ·ba~deugn/ nh:noÂ·dew,7 -ff 234*hopk. 1830,1-.â€ž0 LEGEND aspen, co 81611 de,Ne, co 80202 976.%.9006 0 303,308 1,7- 303,30&1~754 FACE OFCURB SYMBOL MATERIAUPRODUCT AREA u,i,rr cosT 70-ALCOST ON-SITE. GRAS5 SEED 34,202. $150/SF $50,077 .OPIRTYLINE ANDTEMPORARY IRRIGATION ON-SITE, 6 ./0[L 34.202 SF $35/TON $6,470.10 Co.'llan' IN~'Er AS'HALT 2,845. $8/SF $22,760 PARKING bluegreen 014-SiTE, ASPHALT 1,800 SF $5/. $4400 ~ Mp- ALLEY CONNECTOR 070 429,7499 I aspenrce 8161 DUMONT | I- blu~re~n~In- CHATEAU 970429.9499' '40\ NOTES H. I : 1. ASSUMES EXISTINGBUILDING HAS BEEN REMOVEDIN-FULLANDROUG#RADINGIS INAPPROPRIATE 4 | CON['TION TO RECEIVE TOPS' L. 2. OFF-SITE ST.!L,ZATiON IS NOT;NCLUDED ]NTHIS GUARANTEE. PLEASE REFER TO PU8L]C FAC]LINESAND Issue: PUGLIC INFRASTRUCTURE GUARANTEE AND STORM WATER + DRANAGL GUARANTEE FOR ID[NTIONAL 07.14.15 1NFORMAilON. DETAiLED REVIEWAPPLICAT]O ---- * di Id Li i 12 3. LE I L--j 1 r- 1 1 1.- 1 1-] 1-1 -Â·- ALLEY PROPER. LINE 4 1 GLORYHOLE CONDOMINIUMS __ SKY HOTEL ASPEN. CO 81611 709 E. DURANT AVENU m E f f, J h 95 . I FACEOF CURE ' PROPERTY LINE ' f /0 - C-10=3Â»LE 0- rÂ« f ---- m p XY /-- -- 1~~ NORTH \ / 4 PROJECT NO: 21406 I. .te' DWG FILE, 1 . Id'I /:i &3 L SERIES sle~ HOTELd.g ' ASPEN ALPS CONDOMINIUMS ~ * SHEETTITLE .. f LANDSCAPE GUARANTEE PLAN \\ 1 ' i - 1 1 1 * -b PRELIMINARY ====/Ic, I NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION ---- SOUTH SPRING STREET LZEd RECEPTION#: 617367, 02/12/2015 at 11:07:35 AM, 1 OF 14, R $76.00 e K. Vos Caudill, .kin County, CO . , ..1.---- VI.A. 13-yl j I r ji l U Ordinance No. 39 (SERIES OF 2014) AN ORDINANCE OF THE ASPEN CITY COUNCIL GRANTING CONCEPTUAL COMMERCIAL DESIGN REVIEW APPROVAL, CONDITIONAL USE APPROVAL, SPECIAL REVIEW APPROVAL, PLANNED DEVELOPMENT - PROJECT REVIEW APPROVAL, SUBDIVISION APPROVAL, TIMESHARE APPROVAL, AND GROWTH MANAGEMENT APPROVALS, FOR A SITE SPECIFIC DEVELOPMENT PLAN FOR THE SKY HOTEL SUBDIVISION/PLANNED DEVELOPMENT LOCATED ON PROPERTY COMMONLY KNOWN AS 709 E DURANT AVENUE, CITY OF ASPEN, PITKIN COUNTY, COLORADO. Parcel ID: 2737-182-80-001 WHEREAS, the Community Development Department received an application for the Sky Hotel Subdivision/PD (the Application) from Aspen Club Lodge Properties, LLC (Applicant), represented by Sunny Vann of Vann Associates for the following land use review approvals: o Planned Development - Project Review, pursuant to Land Use Code Chapter 26.445. - Timeshare Review, pursuant to Land Use Code Chapter 26.590. â€¢ Subdivision Review, pursuant to Land Use Code Chapter 26.480. â€¢ Growth Management Review - Replacement of Existing Commercial and Lodge Development, pursuant to Land Use Code Chapter 26.470. â€¢ Growth Management Review -Lodge Development, pursuant to Land Use Code Chapter 26.470. e Growth Management Review - New Free Market Residential Units, pursuant to Land Use Code Chapter 26.470. â€¢ Growth Management Review - Affordable Housing, pursuant to Land Use Code Chapter 26.470. â€¢ Special Review to establish Parking, pursuant to Land Use Code Chapter 26.430. â€¢ Conditional Use for commercial space, pursuant to Land Use Code Chapter 26.425. - Commercial Design Review, pursuant to Land Use Code Section 26.412; and, U'HEREAS, all code citation references are to the City of Aspen Land Use Code in effect on the day of initial application - June 23,2014, as applicable to this Project; and, WHEREAS, the Application for the Sky Hotel Subdivision/PD initially proposed: â€¢ 102 hotel units with 102 keys and 103 bedrooms in 44,634 square feet of net livable area. â€¢ 3,380 square feet of accessory commercial net leasable space. - 8 free-market residential units (plus 4 lock-offs) in 14,622 square feet o f net livable area. â€¢ 5 affordable housing units in 4,301 square feet of net livable area. City Council Ordinance No. 39, Series 2014 Page lof 14 P272 RECEPTION#: 617367, 02/12/2n,5 at 11:07:35 AM, 2 OF 14, Janice K. Vos Caudill, Pit County, CO VI.A. â€¢ 83 parking spaces (70 of which are in an underground facility, and 13 of which are at-grade spaces dedicated to the Aspen Alps.); and, WHEREAS, the Community Development Department received referral comments from the Aspen Consolidated Sanitation District, City Engineering, Building Department, Fire Protection District, Environmental Health Department, Parks Department, Parking Department, Aspen/Pitkin County Housing Authority, Public Works Department, and the Transportation Department as a result of the Development Review Committee meeting; and, WHEREAS, pursuant to Section 26.470.040.C.7, Affordable Housing, of the Land Use Code, a recommendation from the Aspen/Pitkin County Housing Authority is required and a recommendation for approval by the board was provided at their July 16, 2014, regular meeting; and, WHEREAS, said referral agencies and the Aspen Community Development Department reviewed the proposed Application and recommended approval with conditions; and, WHEREAS, pursuant to Chapter 26.445 of the Land Use Code, Planned Development - Project Review approval may be granted by the City Council at a duly noticed public hearing after considering recommendations by the Planning and Zoning Commission, the Community Development Director, and relevant referral agencies; and, WHEREAS, pursuant to Chapter 26.480 of the Land Use Code, Subdivision approval may be granted by the City Council at a duly noticed public hearing after considering recommendations by the Planning and Zoning Commission, the Community Development Director, and relevant referral agencies; and, WHEREAS, pursuant to Chapter 26.590 of the Land Use Code, Final Timeshare approval may be granted by the City Council at a duly noticed public hearing after considering recommendations by the Planning and Zoning Commission, the Community Development Director, and relevant referral agencies; and, WHEREAS, pursuant to Chapter 26.304, Common Development Review Procedures, and Section 26.304.060.B.4, Modification of Review Procedures, all other necessary land use reviews, as identified herein, have been combined to be considered by the City Council at a duly noticed public hearing after considering recommendations by the Planning and Zoning Commission, the Community Development Director, and relevant referral agencies; and, WHEREAS, such combination of review procedures was done to ensure clarity of review, was accomplished with all required public noticing provided as evidenced by an affidavit of public noticing submitted to the record, and the public was provided a thorough and full review of the proposed development; and, WHEREAS, the Planning and Zoning Commission reviewed the Application at a duly noticed public hearing on September 16, 2014, and continued to October 7, 2014 and October 21, 2014, during which the recommendations of the Community Development Director and comments from the public were requested and heard by the Planning and Zoning Commission ; and, WHEREAS, in response to feedback from the public, Community Development staff, and the Planning and Zoning Commission on October 7, 2014, the Applicant revised the proposal to include: City Council Ordinance No. 39, Series 2014 Page 2 0 f 14 P273 RECEPTION#: 617367, 02/12/2015 at 11:07:35 AM, 3 OF 14, 1--- 4 -- K . Vos Caudill, P in County, CO VI.A. â€¢ 106 hotel units with 106 keys and 107 bedrooms in 47,092 square feet of net livable area. â€¢ 3,380 square feet of accessory commercial net leasable space. - 6 free-market residential units (plus 2 lock-offs) in 10,322 square feet of net livable area. â€¢ 5 affordable housing units in 4,301 square feet of net livable area. - 83 parking spaces (70 of which are in an underground facility, and 13 of which are at-grade spaces dedicated to the Aspen Alps.); and. WHEREAS, during a duly noticed public hearing on October 21,2014, the Planning and Zoning Commission approved Resolution 15, Series of 2014, by a four to one (4-1) vote recommending City Council approve the Sky Hotel Subdivision/PD Application and all necessary land use reviews, with conditions; and, WHEREAS, on November 24, 2014 the Aspen City Council approved Ordinance No. 39, Series 2014, on First Reading by a three to zero (3-0) vote; and, WHEREAS, the City Council reviewed the Application at a duly noticed public hearing on December 1, 2014, and continued to December 8, 2014, January 12, 2015, and February 9, 2015, during which the recommendations of the Community Development Director and comments from the public were requested and heard by the City Council; and, WHEREAS, in response to feedback from the public and City Council on December 1, 2014, the Applicant revised the proposal to include: â€¢ 104 hotel units, 104 keys and 117 bedrooms in 56,509 square feet of net livable area. â€¢ 3,480 square feet of commercial net leasable space. â€¢ 2 affordable housing units in 1,714square feet ofnet livable area. - 66.5 parking spaces (54 of which are in an underground facility, and 12.5 of which are at-grade spaces dedicated to the Aspen Alps.); and, PMHEREAS, during a public hearing on February 9, 2015, the Aspen City Council approved Ordinance No. 39, Series 2014, by a four to zero (4-0) vote, approving with conditions the Sky Hotel Subdivision and all necessary land use reviews; ands WHEREAS, the Aspen City Council has reviewed and considered the development proposal under the applicable provisions of the Municipal Code as identified herein, has reviewed and considered the recommendation of the Planning and Zoning Commission, the Community Development Director, the applicable referral agencies, and has taken and considered public comment at a public hearing; and, TNHEREAS, the City Council finds that the development proposal meets or exceeds all applicable development standards and that the approval of the development proposal, with conditions, is consistent with the goals and elements of the Aspen Area Community Plan; and, City Council Ordinance No. 39, Series 2014 Page 3 of 14 P274 RECEPTION#: 617367, 02/12/r---5 at 11:07:35 AM, 4 OF 14, Janice K. Vos Caudill, Pit County, CO VI.A. PVHEREAS, the City Council finds that this Ordinance furthers and is necessary for the promotion ofpublic health, safety, and welfare. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ASPEN AS FOLLOWS: Section 1: Approvals Pursuant to the procedures and standards set forth in Title 26 of the Aspen Municipal Code, the City Council hereby grants the Sky Hotel Planned Development - Project Review approval, Subdivision approval, Final Timeshare approval, Growth Management approvals, Special Review approval, Conditional Use approval, and Conceptual Commercial Design approval, for a Site Specific Development Plan for the Sky Hotel Subdivision/PD, subject to the conditions of approval as listed herein. The dimensions shall be those as outlined in Exhibit A. Minor variations may be approved subject to review by the Community Development Department. The Conditional IJse approval shall allow for restaurant, retail, service, and ski locker uses. Section 2: Effectiveness of Ordinance 4. Series 2015 The Sky Hotel project shall be subject to the provisions of Ordinance 4, Series 2015. Section 3: Subsequent Reviews Pursuant to the procedures and standards set forth in Title 26 of the Aspen Municipal Code, the Applicant is required to obtain Final Commercial Design Review and Planned Development - Detail Review following approval of the reviews outlined herein. The applicant shall combine these applications, and they shall be made no later than one (1) year following approval of this Ordinance. Section 4: Timeshare Lodge Requirements A public rental requirement assuring that unused timeshare lodge rooms will be available to the general public. Such rental requirement shall be documented in the Sky Hotel Timeshare Documents and shall contain a provision that this requirement cannot be eliminated from the Condominium Declarations without approval from the City of Aspen City Council. Periodic audits, pursuant to Section 26.575.210, Lodge occupancy auditing, of the Land Use Code may be conducted. Section S: Growth 1Management Allotments 5.1 Reconstruction Credits. Based on the existing Sky Hotel development, the Applicant is entitled to the following reconstruction credits, pursuant to Land Use Chapter 26.470. a. A total of 90 lodging bedrooms, equating to 180 lodge pillows, is credited toward the Project. b. A commercial reconstruction credit of 5,259 square feet of net leasable area is credited toward the Project. 5.2 Growth Management Allotments. The following growth management allotments are recommended to be granted to the Sky Hotel Project: a. 27 lodging bedrooms = 54 lodging pillows. Added to the reconstruction credits, the project represents 107 lodging bedrooms or 214 pillows. City Council Ordinance No. 39, Series 2014 Page 4 of 14 P275 RECEPTION#: 617367, 02/12/2015 at 11:07:35 AM, 5 OF 14, TM-4 -- K. Vos Caudill, P. Ln County, CO VI.A. b. 2 units of affordable housing. Section 6: Affordable Housing 6.1 Mitigation Requirements. The project is proposed to include two (2) affordable housing rental units, including one ( 1) one-bedroom unit and one ( 1) two-bedroom unit. The mitigation required for the project is as follows: Lodge: Mitigate for the additional 27 lodge bedrooms @ 48.6% 27 lodge bedrooms * 0.6 FTEs = 16.2 FTEs generated 16.2 FTEs generated by lodge - 8 FTE commercial credit = 8.2 FTEs generated 8.2 FTEs @ 48.6% mitigation == 3.98 FTEs required mitigation for lodge The proposed affordable housing units will provide housing for 4 FTEs, exceeding the mitigation requirement by 0.02 FTEs. 6.2 Affordable Housing Special Review. Special Review is granted for the finished tloor level of the affordable housing units such that at least fifty percent (50%) of the finished floor of the units shall be located at or above finished grade. 6.3 Affordable Housing Conditions. The two (2) affordable housing units shall be deed restricted at Category 3, and shall meet the following conditions: a. The affordable housing units shall meet or exceed the minimum square footage for Category 3. b. The deed restriction shall be recorded for the affordable housing units prior to Certificate of Occupancy (CO) of the aff-ordable housing units. The CO for the affordable housing units shall be issued at the same time or prior to the CO for the lodge, free-market residential units, and commercial space. c. All tenants shall be approved by APCHA prior to occupancy. d. Employees of the hotel shall be exempt from maximum assets and maximum income for the on-site units; however, the tenants shall not own any other property within the ownership exclusion zone and must work full time as defined in the APCHA Guidelines. e. Minimum occupancy shall be obtained for each units as defined in the APCHA Guidelines. f. The units shall not be vacant for longer than 45 days, unless APCHA notified as to why the unit has been left vacant. g. Washers and dryers shall be provided in each employee housing unit. h. Each affordable housing unit shall be assigned one parking space in the underground garage, and they shall not be the stacked spaced. City Council Ordinance No. 39, Series 2014 Page 5 of 14 P276 RECEPTION#: 617367, 02/12/~-15 at 11:07:35 AM, 6 OF 14, Janice K. Vos Caudill, Pit 1 County, CO VI.A. i. The affordable housing units shall be rental units. The Condominium Declaration shall include language, to be reviewed and approved by APCHA, that should the affordable housing units become ownership units: a. They will be sold through the lottery system. b. The dues will be based on the assessed value of the deed-restricted units vs. the free-market unit as well as the square footage ofthe units; c. No common expenses will be charged to the deed-restricted owners, unless approved by APCHA. d. A separate HOA shall be created for the deed-restricted employee housing units. Section 7: Planned Development - Detail Review In addition to the general documents required as part of a Planned Development - Detail Review, the following items shall be required as part of the Application's Planned Development - Detail Review: An Outdoor Lighting Plan, pursuant to section 26.575.150. An existing and proposed Landscaping Plan, identifying trees with diameters and values. A draft Construction Management Plan. A snow storage and snow shedding plan. Snow is not permitted to shed off roofs onto neighboring properties. Demonstrate that any snow which sheds off roofs will remain on-site. An updated and final Transportation Impact Analysis (TIA), including a monitoring plan. A final design plan for the Spring Street cul-de-sac and bump out, as outlined in Section 9.5 ofthis Ordinance. Section 8: Subdivision/PD Plat and Agreement The Applicant shall submit a Subdivision/PD agreement (hereinafter "Agreement") that meets the requirements of the Land Use Code within 180 days of final approval. The 180 days shall commence upon the granting of Final Commercial Design and Planned Development - Detail Review approvals by the Planning & Zoning Commission. The recordation documents shall be submitted in accordance with the requirements of Section 26.490 Approval Documents of the Land Use Code. a. In accordance in Section 26.490.040, Approval Documents Content and Form, the following plans are required in the Approved Plan Set: 1. Final Commercial Design Review/ Architectural Character Plan. 2. Planned Development Project and Detail Review Plans. 3. Public Amenity Plans. 4. Public Infrastructure Plan. 5. Final Transportation Impact Analysis (TIA), including a monitoring plan. 6. Subdivision Plat (the subdivision plat shall show a non-exclusive easement for ingress and egress across the easterly portion of the Applicant's property between Durant Avenue and the alley in Block 107, for the use of Chateau Chaumont and Chateau DuMont condominiums) b. In accordance with Section 26.490.050, Development Agreements, a Development Agreement shall be entered into with the City. City Council Ordinance No. 39, Series 2014 Page 6 of 14 P277 t-4 p 0.9 9.p RECEPTION#: 617367, 02/12/2015 at 11:07:35 AM, 7 OF 14, 1.-- 4 -- K. Vos Caudill, PY -n County, CO VI.A. c. In accordance with Section 26.490.060, Financial and Site Protection Requirements, the applicant shall provide a site protection guarantee and a site enhancement guarantee. d. In accordance with Section 26.490.070. Performance Guarantees, the following guarantees are required in an amount equal to 150% of the current estimated cost of the improvement: 1. Landscape Guarantee. 2. Public Facilities and Public Infrastructure Guarantee. 3. Storm Water and Drainage Improvements Guarantee. The timeshare docs and condo map referenced e. and f., below, shall not be prepared until substantial completion of construction and should not be included in the 180 day deadline. They will be required prior to CO. e. In accordance with Section 26.590, Timeshare, the Applicant shall incorporate the requirements and restrictions of the City's Timeshare Regulations into the final timeshare instruments, including: 1. State requirements, 2. Owner occupancy limitations and disclosure of the public rental requirement, 3. Provisions for reserve funds for ongoing maintenance, 4. Prohibited practices and uses, 5. Limits on marketing techniques, 6. A prohibition against long-term storage of owner vehicles, and 7. Prohibitions on offering non-Aspen gifts within a marketing plan. f. A Condominium Map shall be competed for the development in accordance with Section 26.480.050(A), Condominiumization. The Condominium Map shall depict the non-exclusive easement described in Section 8.a.6. Section 9: Engineering Department The Applicant's design shall be compliant with all sections of the City of Aspen Municipal Code, Title 21 and all construction and excavation standards published by the Engineering Department. 9.1 Drainage: The project shall meet the Urban Runoff Management Plan Requirements. A compliant drainage plan. including a 100-year mudflow analysis, must be submitted with a building permit application. A variance request will not be granted for exclusion of WCQV for Basin 8D. An inflow control mechanism could be proposed to limit the runoff that enters the BMP and allow any access runoff from offsite to bypass the structure. The vault access doors are proposed on the sidewalk at the hotel entrance. To improve the pedestrian experience, cover or hide the access lids or place them on the side of the sidewalk rather than the center. City Council Ordinance No. 39, Series 2014 Page 7 0 f 14 P278 RECEPTION#: 617367, 02/12/~A15 at 11:07:35 AM, 8 OF 14, Janice K. Vos Caudill, Pit County, CO VI.A. 9.2 Sidewalk/Curb/Gutter: All sidewalk curb and gutter shall meet the Engineering Standards of City of Aspen Municipal Code Title 21. Pedestrian and vehicular traffic shall be distinguished in the alley. 9.3 Excavation Stabilization: Due to the proximity of the neighboring property and the excavation of the building, an excavation stabilization plan shall be submitted to the Engineering Department prior to building permit submittal. 9.4 CMP: a. The Construction Management Plan shall describe mitigation for parking, staging/encroachments, and truck traffic. b. The applicant will work with neighboring properties, including the Chateau Chaumont and Chateau Du Mont ("Neighbors") to obtain their input in the Construction Management Plan ("CMP") for the new Sky Hotel prior to presenting the CMP to the City of Aspen. The CMP will include the appointment of a specific construction team person as the contact for all Neighbors' questions and suggestions regarding the construction process. Neighbors desire uninterrupted access to the units and parking spaces within their condominiums. Applicant shall use good faith efforts to minimize interruptions for access for condominium owners and guests to the units and parking spaces within the condominiums. Applicant shall limit the most disruptive alley work directly in front of the Neighbors' condominium buildings to April 15 through June 15 and October 1 to November 20 of each year. The specific hours and details for access will be determined in the CMP. In recognition of the fact that the Neighbors' properties are immediately adjacent and very near the Sky Hotel, the CMP shall provide for real and significant noise and dust control measures. For example, watering exposed areas as reasonably necessary to suppress dust during all times of excavation, and the provision of physical sound barriers between the construction site and the Neighbors' properties to be erected prior to commencement of excavation and construction activities in order to mitigate sound impacts. These neighborhood agreements are intended to augment, rather than supersede City of Aspen construction regulations 9.5 Traffic Flow: The applicant shall address the cut-de-sac design and the Spring Street bump out as part of the Detail PD Review. The Spring Street cul-de-sac area and final design will require approval from Aspen Fire District, which may or may not require additional improvements to the cul-de-sac. The alley direction shall remain the same as today - entry from Durant and exit onto Original. Section 10: Fire Mitigation All codes adopted by the Aspen Fire Protection District shall be met. This includes but is not limited to access (International Fire Code (IFC), 2003 Edition, Section 503), approved fire sprinkler and fire alarm systems (IFC, as amended, Section 903 and 907). The subgrade garage shall have adequate fire access. This shall be reviewed and approved by the Fire Marshall. Section 11: Parks Department City Council Ordinance No. 39, Series 2014 Page 8 of 14 P279 RECEPTION#: 617367, 02/12/2015 at 11:07:35 AM, 9 OF 14, K. Vos Caudill, PY _n County, CO VI.A. Tree removal permits are required prior to issuance of a building permit for any demolition or significant site work. Mitigation for removals must be met by paying cash in lieu, planting on site, or a combination of both, pursuant to Chapter 13.20 of the City Municipal Code. Any plantings on the roof shall not qualify as mitigation. The applicant shall explore potential sites around the property to allow full maturation of trees. This shall be included as part of the PD Detail Review. A tree protection plan indicating the drip lines of each individual tree or groupings of trees remaining on site shall be included in the building permit application for any demolition or significant site work. The plan shall indicate the location of protective zones for approval by the City Forester and prohibit excavation, storage of materials, storage of construction backfill, storage of equipment, and access over or through the zone by foot or vehicle. Section 12: Aspen Consolidated Sanitation District Requirements Service is contingent upon compliance with the District's rules, regulations, and specifications, which are on file at the District office. ACSD will review the approved Drainage plans to assure that clear water connections (roof, foundation, perimeter, patio drains) are not connected to the sanitary sewer system. On-site sanitary sewer utility plans require approval by ACSD. Permanent improvements are prohibited in sewer easements or right of ways. Landscaping plans will require approval by ACSD where soft and hard landscaping may impact public ROW or easements to be dedicated to the district. Old service lines must be excavated and abandoned at the main sanitary sewer line according to specific ACSD requirements and prior to micropiling. Soil nails are not allowed in rights of way. One tap is allowed for each building. Shared service line agreements may be required where more than one unit is served by a single service line. Below grade development may require installation of a pumping system. Above grade development shall flow by gravity. Plumbing plans for the pool and spa areas require approval of the drain size by the district. Glycol snowmelt and heating systems must have containment provisions and must preclude discharge to the public sanitary sewer system. Oil and Grease interceptors are required for all new and remodeled food processing establishments. Oil and Sand separators are required for public vehicle parking garages and vehicle maintenance facilities. Driveway entrance drains shall not be routed to ACSD's sanitary sewer infrastructure but rather be mitigated in accordance with the City of Aspen's Urban Runoff Management Plan. Elevator shafts drains must flow thru Oil and Sand interceptor. Plans for interceptors, separators and containment facilities require submittal by the applicant and approval prior to a building permit application. Where additional development would produce flows that would exceed the planned reserve capacity of the existing system (collection system and or treatment system) an additional proportionate fee will be assessed to eliminate the downstream collection system or treatment City Council Ordinance No. 39, Series 2014 Page 9 of 14 P280 RECEP1ION#: 617367, 02/12/'--15 at 11:07:35 AM, 10 OF 14, Janice K. Vos Caudill, Pit 1 County, CO VI.A. capacity constraint. Additional proportionate fees would be collected over time from all development in the area of concern in order to fund the improvements needed. Where additional development would produce flows that would overwhelm the planned capacity of the existing collection system and or treatment facility, the development will be assessed fees to cover the costs of replacing the entire portion of the system that would be overwhelmed. The District would fund the costs of constructing reserve capacity in the area of concern Conly for the material cost difference for larger line). The Applicant shall furnish average and peak flows as well as service size prior to final design. The district will be able to respond with more specific comments and requirements once detailed building and utility plans are available. All ACSD total connection fees must be paid prior to the issuance of a building permit. Amendments to the above requirements agreed to in writing by the Applicant and the Aspen Consolidated Sanitation District shall supersede the sanitation requirements listed herein. Section 13: Environmental Health Department 13.1 Environmental Health Codes: The State of Colorado mandates specific mitigation requirements with regard to asbestos. Additionally, code requirements to be aware of when filing a building permit include: a prohibition on engine idling, regulation of fireplaces, fugitive dust requirements, noise abatement and pool designs. 13.2 Trash Requirements: The trash enclosures shall meet the minimum requirements outlined in Title 12. Prior to Detail PD Review, the Applicant shall identify the type of door to be installed on the trash enclosures for review and approval by the Environmental Health Department. Trash and deliveries shall be located off the Alley, as represented in plans presented to City Council. 13.3 Deliveries and Trash Removal: In the alley in Block 102, all deliveries and trash removal to and from the new Sky Hotel will occur between the hours of 8:00 a.m. and 7:00 p.m. except under the following circumstances: â€¢ Heavy snowfalls, acts of God, and force majeure â€¢ Food & Wine Classic, in which case, for 3 days prior to the event, these timelines may be exceeded to include the following hours: 7:00 a.m. to 10:00 p.m. e X-Games, in which case, for 3 days prior to the event these timelines may be exceeded to include the following hours: 7:00 a.m. to 10:00 p.m. â€¢ Christmas, in which case, for 3 days prior to Christmas Eve, these timelines may be exceeded to include the following hours: 7:00 a.m. to 10:00 p.in. - New Years, in which case, for 3 days prior to New Years' Eve, these timelines may be exceeded to include the following hours: 7:00 a.m. to 10:00 p.in. There shall be only two service doors at the delivery and trash removal area. Applicant shall schedule deliveries and trash removal at the Sky Hotel so that the alley in Block 102 is not unreasonably blocked by vehicles servicing the Sky Hotel, whether parked or waiting for other service vehicles to vacate the service bays. There shall be no unreasonable City Council Ordinance No. 39, Series 2014 Page 10 of 14 P281 RECEPTION#: 617367, 02/12/2015 at 11:07:35 AM, 11 OF 14, 7--4 -- K. Vos Caudill, P. -n County, CO VI.A. parking or idling of delivery or service vehicles in the access area between the alley in Block 102 and Durant Avenue on the Sky Hotel property adjacent to the Neighbors. The requirements of Paragraph 13.3 shall take effect upon the issuance of the Final Certificate of Occupancy for the newly constructed Sky Hotel. 13.4 Noise Requirements: Tile Applicant shall be required to install a sound system to accommodate the acoustic needs for day-to-day operations as well as special events. Outside events are not permitted to bring in their own sound equipment, unless approved by the City through a Temporary Use Approval or a Special Events Permit. Noise levels shall meet City requirements at all times. The applicant shall explore an engineered solution that does not require additional noise paneling. If an engineered solution is not achievable, removable transparent panels o f no more than 4.5 feet in height (from the point of attachment) shall be permitted on the second floor and rooftop decks to help abate noise. These shall be removed within 24 hours following an event. In the event the removable panels are required for back-to-back events, they may be up for no longer than seven (7) continuous days. The Applicant shall meet with representative from the Community Development and Environmental Health Departments prior to submission of the main building permit to review the engineered solution options and evaluate the need for the noise panels referenced herein. The Sky Hotel will satisfy all of the time and decibel levels as required by the City regulations, as the same may be amended from time to time. Notwithstanding City Code limitations, the decibel level at the property line between the Sky Hotel and the Skegby Residence, as measured by the City of Aspen Enforcement Officer, shall not exceed 60 dB- A; and the decibel level at the property line between the Sky Hotel and the Neighbors shall not exceed 60 dB-A measured from the southwest corner of the Chateau Chaumont properly line and the southwest corner of the 3rd floor courtyard balcony. In both cases such measurements shall be made using a sound level meter with the "A" weighting scale, set on "slow" response at any time there is activity on the roof top of the Sky Hotel. The noise level shall be assessed by taking numerous measurements over a number of minutes, and averaging those readings. The sound level meters must meet Type 2 specifications, according to ANSI S 1.4-2014 (or most current edition), and that sound level meter should be checked prior to measurements with a field calibrator. The noise measured must actually originate from the Sky Hotel. Any measurement must take into account and consider other background noises as required by the City code at the time of the event and measurement. All activity (except for the limited purposes of cleaning and removal of sound barriers) on the roof top areas of the Sky Hotel shall cease at the earlier of 10:00 p.m. or the time provided in the City regulations for the eessation of outdoor amplified music unless a Special Event Permit is obtained from the City by the Sky Hotel. There shall be no more than 15 Special Events per year for which Applicant or the Sky Hotel applies to the City for activity on the rooftop areas, and in no case shall Special Event activity on the roof top continue beyond 11:00 p.m. on any night. Provided, however, removal of sound barriers may be permitted to take place after the conclusion of any special event. Sound barriers will be limited to the areas shown on the plans dated January 26, 2015 submitted by the City Council Ordinance No. 39, Series 2014 Page 11 of 14 P282 RECEPTION#: 617367, 02/12/ An 15 at 11:07:35 AM, 12 OF 14, Janice K. Vos Caudill, Pit . County, CO VI.A. Applicant. The requirements of this section (Part 13.4) shall take effect upon the issuance of the Final Certificate of Occupancy for the newly constructed Sky Hotel. Section 14: Transportation Department The applicant shall implement the TDM and MMLOS mitigation measures, as outlined in the application. CMP and TMP should be mindful of Rubey Park construction scheduled for spring- fall of 2015. Any closures/re-routes of Durant Street will need to be coordinated with this project. Regardless of construction date, closures/impacts to Durant Street should be limited and coordinated well in advance with RFTA and the public. An updated TIA is required at the PD- Detail Review and shall include a monitoring plan. Section 15: Parking 15.1 Fire Lane: The new cut-in loading zone on Spring shall continue to be a public loading zone for goods and passengers and the balance of Spring Street must remain a Fire Lane. 15.2 Required Parking: A total of fifty-four (54) spaces shall be provided in the sub-grade parking garage, seven (7) of which are stacked spaces. The proj ect generated a requirement of forty-one (41) parking spaces. 15.3 Parking Garage Use: All spaces in the parking garage shall be limited to use by guests, tenants, and users of the Project, with the exception that up to thirteen (13) parking spaces in the parking garage may be made available to Chateau DuMont on a space available basis as determined by the Sky Hotel General Manager. Long-term car storage by any user of the garage shall be prohibited. 15.4 Affordable Housing Parking: Each affordable housing unit shall be assigned a parking space in the parking garage. These shall be located in a regular, non-stacked, parking space. Long-term storage of vehicles that are owned or used by the affordable housing tenants is permitted. Section 16: Water/Utilities Department The Applicant shall comply with the City of Aspen Water System Standards, with Title 25, and with the applicable standards of Title 8 (Water Conservation and Plumbing Advisory Code) of the Aspen Municipal Code, as required by the City of Aspen Water Department. All Water System Distribution standards in place at the time of building permit shall apply, and all tap fees will be assess per applicable codes and standards. IJtility placement and design shall meet adopted City of Aspen standards. Section 17: Outdoor Lighting and Signage All outdoor lighting and all signage shall meet the requirements of the Aspen Municipal Code. Section 18: Public Amenity Spaces The Applicant has committed to providing a total of 12,408 sq ft of public amenity space (3,113 sq ft at grade, 1,553 sq ft on a second floor deck, and 7,742 sq ft on the roof top deck). These spaces shall be permanently accessible by the public through stairs and/or elevators. These spaces shall not be enclosed with temporary or permanent walls/windows or otherwise enclosed City Council Ordinance No. 39, Series 2014 Page 12 of 14 P283 RECEPTION#: 617367, 02/12/2015 at 11:07:35 AM, 13 OF 14 -r-- 4-- K. Vos Caudill, pi .n County, CO VI.A. as interior conditioned space, with the exception of the noise barriers referenced in Section 13.3. Approved Public Amenity space on the roof shall be subject to a public access easement. Section 19: Building Department The Applicant shall meet all applicable building and accessibility codes in place at the time of building permit. The elevator accessing the roof is required to meet IBC accessibility requirements. The ground floor affordable housing units shall be provided with a compliant circulation path within the site that connects the units to the parking and the public right o f way. Section 20: All material representations and commitments made by the Applicant pursuant to the development proposal approvals as herein awarded, whether in public hearing or documentation presented before the Planning and Zoning Commission or City Council, are hereby incorporated in such plan development approvals and the same shall be complied with as if fully set forth herein, unless amended by an authorized entity. Section 21: This Ordinance shall not affect any existing litigation and shall not operate as an abatement of any action or proceeding now pending under or by virtue of the ordinances repealed or amended as herein provided, and the same shall be conducted and concluded under such prior ordinances. Section 22: If any section, subsection, sentence, clause, phrase, or portion of this Ordinance is for any reason held invalid or unconstitutional in a court of competent j urisdiction, such portion shall be deemed a separate, distinct and independent provision and shall not affect the validity of the remaining portions thereof. INTRODUCED, READ AND ORDERED PUBLISHED as provided by law, by the City Council of the City of Aspen on the 25th day of November, 2014. - / lSteven ~idroIC-*Iayor ATTwST LiA;16'Manning. City Clerk FINALLY, adopted, passed ana approved this 9th day of February, 2015. I /1 APPROVED AS TO FORM: APPÂ¥OVED AST~/CONTENT: ~ 0#-U- JaWes R. True, City Attorney Steven S,*al<ron, Mivor / City Council OrJinance No. 39, Series 2014 Page 13 of 14 P284 RECEPTION#: 617367, 02/12/ ; A 15 at 11:07:35 AM, 14 OF 14, Janice K. Vos Caudill, Pit County, CO VI.A. ATTE~T: (115~1 ATTACHMENTS: Exhibit A: Approved Dimensional Requirements Exhibit A: Approved Dimensional Requirements 104 units and 117 bedrooms in Lodge Units and Net Livable 56,509 sq ft net livable Commercial Net Leasable 3,480 sq ft net leasable Affordable Housing Units and Net Livable 2 units in 1,714 sq ft net livable Minimum Gross Lot Size (sq ft) 42,645 sq ft Minimum Net Lot Size (sq ft) 37,113 sq ft Minimum Net Lot Area per Free-Market dwelling unit 4,864 sq ft (sci ft) Minimum Lot Width (feet) 116 ft Minimum Front Yard Setback (feet) Above Grade - 10 ft Below Grade - 5 ft Above Grade - 6.4 ft East Wing; 2.8 ft Minimum East Side Yard Setback (feet) West Wing Below Grade - 10 ft Minimum West Side Yard Setback (feet) Above Grade - 13 ft Below Grade - 5 ft Minimum Rear Yard Setback (feet) Above Grade - 5 ft Below Grade - 5 ft Maximum Height (feet) 40 feet Maximum Height for mechanical 50 feet Public Amenity Space 11,798 sq ft (27.6%) Allowed Floor Area* Overall 91,552 sq ft (2.46:1)* Lodge 72,781 sq ft (1.96:1) Commercial 3,460 sq ft (.09:1) Affordable Housing 1,876 sq ft (.05:1) Parking Garage: 54 Spaces Minimum Off-Street Parking Surface Spaces: 12.5 spaces for Aspen Alps Minimum Trash/Recycle Area 560 sq ft *Minor changes during PD - Detail Review and/or building permit review may be approved such that they do not exceed those in the underlying zone district City Council Ordinance No. 39, Series 2014 Page 14 of 14 P285 VI.A. Exhibit~: Skv Hotel DRC Comments, August 12,2015 Zoning 1. Please double check the Floor Area calculations: appears there is an error on the basement where the commercial space is counted twice 2. Table 1 sites a section of Code 26.575.020(D)(7) Garages and Carports for subgrade exemption; wrong section, please amend or explain. 3. Please review items in the setback to confirm meet all applicable setback requirements. 4. Height verification will require charts, interpolated grade survey and measurement from most restrictive grade. 5. Provide site plan with approved, and amended setbacks for each level of the structure. Provide a chart. 6. Outdoor lighting will be reviewed at Building permit. Parks 1. Tree species to be called out and approved by the City Forester. 2. Location of tree plantings to be approved in the field by the City Forester. (Must not be too close to building) 3. Larger planting strips on both the northwest corner of property and pull out area on Spring Street or Silva cells would be required. 4. Plan on areas that can grow trees well into maturity. 5. Location of utilities to be away from tree planting areas. Utilities 1. All 2014 water System Distribution standards will apply, all tap fees will be assessed per applicable codes and standards. Sanitation 1. Service is contingent upon compliance with the District's rules, regulations, and specifications, which are on file at the District office. 2. ACSD will review the approved Drainage plans to assure that clear water connections (roof, foundation, perimeter, patio drains) are not connected to the sanitary sewer system. 3. On-site utility plans require approval by ACSD. 4. Oil and Sand separators are required for parking garages and vehicle maintenance establishments. 5. Driveway entrance drains must drain to drywells. 6. Elevator shafts drains must flow thru 0/s interceptor 7. Oil and Grease interceptors (NOT traps) are required for all food processing establishment. Locations of food processing shall be identified priorto building permit. Even though the commercial space is tenet finish, interceptors will be required at this time if food processing establishments are anticipated for this project. ACSD will not approve service to food processing establishments retrofitted for this use by small undercounter TRAPS at a later date. 8. The applicant will have to provide locations and sizing of interceptors to the District prior to the District approving service to this development. Exhibit ~- Sky Hotel DRC Comments * Page 1 of 3 P286 VI.A. 9. Old service lines must be excavated and abandoned at the main sanitary sewer line according to specific ACSD requirements and prior to micropiling. Soil nails are not allowed in ROW. 10. The applicant has shown an 8" sanitary sewer service on their plans to serve this development. The developer will have to deposit funds with the District to install a manhole to accommodate the propose 8" sanitary sewer service. 11. Below grade development may require installation of a pumping system. Above grade development shall flow by gravity. 12. One tap is allowed for each building. Shared service line agreements may be required where more than one unit is served by a single service line. 13. Permanent improvements are prohibited in sewer easements or right of ways. Landscaping plans will require approval by ACSD where soft and hard landscaping may impact public ROW or easements to be dedicated to the district. 14. All ACSD fees must be paid prior to the issuance of a building permit. Peg in our office can develop an estimate forthis project once detailed plans have been made available to the district. 15. Where additional development would produce flows that would exceed the planned reserve capacity of the existing system (collection system and or treatment system) an additional proportionate fee will be assessed to eliminate the downstream collection system or treatment capacity constraint. Additional proportionate fees would be collected over time from all development in the area of concern in order to fund the improvements needed. 16. Where additional development would produce flows that would overwhelm the planned capacity of the existing collection system and or treatment facility, the development will be assessed fees to coverthe costs of replacing the entire portion of the system that would be overwhelmed. The District would fund the costs of constructing reserve capacity in the area of concern (only for the material cost difference for larger line). 17. Glycol heating and snow melt systems must be designed to prohibit and discharge of glycol to any portion of the public and private sanitary sewer system. The glycol storage areas must have approved containment facilities. 18. Sopris Engineering will furnish average and peak flows as well as service size priorto final design. 19. The district will be able to respond with more specific comments and requirements once detailed buildingand utility plans are available. Engineering These comments are not intended to be exclusive, but an initial response to the Detail Review project packet submitted for purpose of the DRC meeting. Refer to attached site plan for comment clarifications. 1. The sidewalk on Durant is attached with no buffer which does not meet COA Design standards. The sidewalk must be detached along the property, through the driveway and transition back to attached on the east side of the drive. 2. The drop off area is required to have an ADA ramp complies with ICC/ANSI section 503. Please revise. Exhibit,0- Sky Hotel DRC Comments Page 2 of 3 L/- P287 fie VI.A. 3. The valleypan along South Spring Street needs further vetting to determine the configuration at the median. As currently drawn, the valleypan will not function where it connects to the drop off median. 4. Demonstrate that South Spring St meets minimum road width with the sky Hotel drop off area and median. The following items can be resolved at building permit and serve as an advance notice for items the Engineering Department will be looking for. 1. The pervious pavers and median that make up the drop off and pick up area will require a permanent encroachment license. Maintenance will be the responsibility of the Sky Hotel. 2. Ramps are required to have wings with a 10:1 maximum slope. Ramps are only permitted to have side curbs if the fill area is landscaped. 3. Snow is not permitted to shed off roofs onto neighboring properties. Demonstrate that any snow which sheds off roofs will remain onsite. 4. Runoff along portions of the Block 107 Alley appears to drain toward the building. How will the building, specifically at stairway openings, be protected from this flow? At building permit provide a cross section at the stair opening within the alley, demonstrate that runoff will not be directed down the stairs. 5. Ensure inlets do not interfere with pedestrian ramps. Some inlets are forcing ramps to have side curbs instead of wings-the configuration should be done in a mannerto accommodate the inlet and ramp. If not feasible please demonstrate this at building permit. 6. Bioretention is only effective in areas that can promote positive growth and sustainability. Several proposed locations are adjacent to buildings or situated in areas that will receive limited sunlight. These should be reviewed for effectiveness, and considered as non-infiltration bioretention areas. There is still concern about how well plants will grow in BRC 7. 7. Consider the connection to the Ute Trail extension on the east side of the property. Could the orientation and location of the sidewalk and crosswalk be improved so pedestrians from Ute Trail continue on the sidewalk? This was not addressed in the updated submittal. 8. At building permit for both driveway access points provide a sight triangle analysis. Demonstrate that there is adequate visibility for vehicles. The stone wall on the northeast corner of the property may need to be removed as it limits visibility for vehicles in the alley. Exhibit~- Sky Hotel DRC Comments Page 3 of 3 P288 f jibit P VI.A. Chateau Dumont Condominium Association August 13, 2015 Aspen City Council This letter confirms that the Chateau Dumont HOA supported and remains in support of the application by Sky Hotel for a development approval as granted by the City of Aspen, Ordinance 39, adopted on February 9, 2015 as represented through its attorney, Michael C. Ireland on the night of adoption at the public hearing. Sincerely, 0-04' - ~'~~ James Valerio L-/ As VP for Chateau Dumont Condominium Board of Directors Aspen City Clerk RECEIVED AUG 1 3 2015 P289 (9< VI.A. 1< C KLEIN COTE EDWARDS CITRON LLC E C ATTORNEYS HERBERT S. KLEIN* hsk@kceclaw.com 101 SOUTH MILL STREET LANCE R. COTt, PC*â€¢ cote@kceclaw.com SUITE 200 JOSEPH E. EDWARDS, 111, PC* jee@kceclaw.com ASPEN, COLORADO 81611 KENNETH E. CITRON ... kcitron@kceclaw.com TELEPHONE: (970) 925-8700 MADHU B. KRISHNAMURTI mbk@kceclaw.com www.kceclaw.com 'also admitted in Hawaii **also admitted in California also admitted In New York and Massachusetts August 13, 2015 Via Email,iessica.garrow@citvofaspen.com Planning and Zoning Commission, City of Aspen c/o Jessica Garrow City o f Aspen Community Development Departnient 130 S. Galena Street, 3rd Floor Aspen, CO 81611 Re: Sky Hotel - Planned Development Detailed Review Application Dear Commissioners: As you probably recall, my office represents tlie Chateau Chauniont Condominium Â¢r' -- N Association ("CC"). My office previously represented but no longer represents Chateau Du Mont Condominium Association ("CD"). During the City Council's review ofthe Planned Development Project Review, Conceptual Commercial Design Review, GMQS Review for Lodging and Affordable Housing, Timeshare Review, Subdivision Review, Conditional Use Review, Special Review, and Right-Of-Way Vacation Ordinance Amendments application ("Project Review Application") filed by the Sky Hotel, the CC determined to remain "neutral" as to the Project Review Application and did not oppose (and is not now opposed to) the final building plans submitted by the Sky Hotel with the Project Review Application. For the reasons discussed below, CC is not neutral, and is, in fact, opposed to the Construction Management Plans ("CMP") which has been submitted as a part of the Sky Hotel Planned Development Detailed Review Application ("Detailed Review Application"). There are four separate problems with the CMP. While we understand that you are not generally tasked with review o f the details of CMPs because those plans are subject to review by the City Engineer, we believe you do have some authority in this circumstance because Ordinance 39 (Series of 2014) ("Ord. 39") (which approved the Project Review Application) specifically required the Sky Hotel to include a draft CMP in the Detailed Review Application for your consideration. See Ordinance 39-2014, Sections 7c and 9.4. While we do not expect that you will review any engineering-related details, some of the broad concepts discussed below are properly subject to your review. By way of context, this neighborhood is configured in an unusual manner because it involved multiple vacations of rights of way and because the sole access for most of the CC units P290 VI.A. Planning and Zoning Commission August 13, 2015 Page 2 (and for niost of the CD units) is from Dean Street (or the "Block 107 Alley," as it is labeled in the Detailed Review Application). While this is not ideal, it has been this way since the CC project was constructed and since the CC condominium map was recorded in 1971. Also, except for a very small underground garage, the only off-street parking for CC is four parallel spaces on CC property along the north side of Dean St. Dean Street is only 20 feet wide. As was acknowledged in prior public hearings by Sky Hotel representatives, the owners of units in CC have a prescriptive easement across Sky Hotel property between the existing Sky Hotel and the CD building from Durant Ave. to Dean St. ("Easement"). Attached is a copy of the proposed Sky Hotel Construction Management Site Logistics Plan that is Appendix B to the proposed CMP ("CMP Map"). The area of the Easement is highlighted iii yellow on the CMP Map. Historically, all vehicular traffic to Dean St. has traveled in a one-way manner from Durant Ave., across the Easement to Dean St. and then along Dean St. to Original St. The four problems with the Sky Hotel's draft CMP are access, the tower crane, traffic flow and the lack of a schedule. Each is discussed below. Access The CMP proposes to eliminate the right of CC unit owners and rental guests to use the Easement for access to or from Dean St. and to CC. Specifically, the CMP proposes that the City agree to allow the Sky Hotel to close off the western end of Dean St. where the Easement and Dean St. intersect so that the Sky Hotel can have exclusive use of this portion of the public right of way and all of the Easement. Tile portion of Dean St. that the Sky Hotel proposes to take exclusive control over is highlighted in pink on the CMP Map. The Sky Hotel proposes that construction and emergency vehicle traffic flow in the opposite direction from the historical traffic flow; in otlier words, from Original St., along Dean St., to the Easement and to Durant Ave, Further, the Sky Hotel proposes that non-emergency and non-construction traffic enter Dean St. from Original St., negotiate a turn-around (the location of which is not specified) and then exit Dean St. at Original St. In other words, the Sky Hotel proposes to turn most of Dean St. into a two-way traffic area. As mentioned above, Dean St. is 20-feet iii width and is the sole access for most of the CC and CD units. Pedestrian access must therefore be protected from and separated from the construction and other traffic proposed for Dean St. Tile draft CMP does not address pedestrian traffic on Dean St. (See Section 7, CMP). Regardless of this omission, it will be necessary for the Sky Hotel to construct a pedestrian walkway along Dean St. from Original St. to at least the CD courtyard and entrance area. Section 21.12.180 of the Municipal Code requires tlie City Engineer to protect the safety and welfare of the public and to conform to the Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices (MUTCD). In the context of temporary traffic controls, the MUTCD Section 68.01.2.E. states, "Bicyclists and pedestrians, including those witll disabilities, should be provided with access and reasonably safe passage through the TTC zone." (The "TTC zone" is the P291 VI.A. Planning and Zoning Commission August 13,2015 Page 3 "temporary traffic control zone.") Moreover, Ord 39 states that pedestrian and vehicular traffic "shall be distinguished" in the alley. "Reasonably safe passage" and prudent protection of the safety and welfare of pedestrian traffic within a narrow (20-foot wide) right of way where two- way traffic and construction traffic is proposed means that it will be necessary for the Sky Hotel to construct a pedestrian walkway from Original St. along Dean St. to the entry areas for CC and CD. I measured the width of the existing pedestrian access walkway existing today along Hunter between Hyman Ave, and the Block 95 alley; and that walkway is five feet, seven inches in width. Dean St. is 20 feet wide. Once a pedestrian walkway is constructed in Dean St., there will only be 14 feet, five inches available for the proposed two-way traffic - this is traffic for CC rental guests and owners, construction traffic, emergency vehicular traffic (potentially including fire trucks and ambulances), and commercial delivery traffic (e.g., Federal Express, UPS, taxi drop off of guests to CC or CD, and delivery or maintenance vehicles). Fourteen feet, five inches is not a sufficient width for two-way traffic of these types of vehicles and thus does not provide a reasonable access to CC i f free and unfettered use of the Easement is taken from CC as is proposed by sky Hotel. Colorado case law provides that a municipality may relocate, close or alter streets, alleys and rights of way so long as adjacent private property retains reasonable access. If the access is not reasonable or is substantially damaged, tlie municipality can relocate, close or alter the right of way only after just compensation to the land owner. In this case, there is no proposal to compensate CC for the taking ofthe Easement rights or the closure of the Dean St. as proposed by the Sky Hotel. Nor is there any proposal to compensate the owners of the CC small lodge -- apartments for what will undoubtedly be their very significant loss of income from their rental of such apartments, by granting a very significant benefit to the Sky Hotel. Consequently, approval of the Detail Review Application would constitute your approval of a proposed inverse condemnation of the current access to CC. This would be an abuse of your discretion. Tower Crane The CMP Map illustrates a "Tower Crane" in the corner of the "L" shaped construction site. In conversations with Sky Hotel representatives, CC objected to the swinging of the crane above the CC. Sky Hotel representatives indicated that the crane will swing over the CC but will be "unloaded" when it does so. The invasion of the airspace of another property owner witliout permission is a trespass and is against the law. The Sky Hotel has not sought and does not have permission of the CC Owners' Association or the individual owners of units within CC to trespass in CC airspace. Presumably, such permission has not yet been obtained from other adjacent land owners. It would be an abuse of your discretion to purport to grant an approval of a plan that indicates an intent to commit an illegal act. Traffic Flow Ord. 39, Section 9.5, "Traffic Flow" states, "The alley direction shall remain the same as today - entry from Durant and exit on Original." The CMP purports to completely close the entry from Durant Avenue and thereby completely shut down traffic over the easement from Durant k P292 VI.A. Planning and Zoning Commission August 13, 2015 Page 4 Avenue to the alley and the west end of the alley, and also to change the traffic flow on the eastern portion of the alley throughout the period of construction, which according to Sky Hotel representatives will likely be at least 20 months. This is in direct violation of Ord. 39. One of the criteria by which P&Z is required to review the Detailed Review Application is consistency with the Project Review approval. See Â§26.445.070A, Land Use Regulations. It would be an abuse of your discretion to approve a Detailed Review that proposes a CMP directly in violation of the Project Review approval. Schedule Because of the unique circumstances of the neighborhood, Ord. 39 requires that the Sky Hotel provide a draft CMP for your review. The City's CMP Requirements Manual requires a schedule and description of dates of construction. Under Title 21 of the Municipal Code, there are strict limits on the use of the City's rights of way at different times of the year. For example, the placement of pedestrian barricades within streets and alleys is prohibited from November 1 through March 31. This means that Dean St. must operate in a one-way fashion during this time period each year. Also, Ord. 39 provides that the most disruptive work in Dean St. (utility excavations) shall be limited to April 15 through Julie 15 and October 1 through November 20. In conversations witli Sky Hotel representatives, it has been asserted that the utility installation work in Dean St. will be performed from May tlirough July 3 of 2016. Without a schedule it is impossible to know whether the Sky Hotel's Detailed Review application complies with the requirements of Ord. 39. For the above reasons, we respectfully request that you deny the Detailed Review Application. Very truly youft KLEIN COTE EDWARDS CITRON LL( By: / - 1 T 1 JoseDLE. Edwards, III / 07 CC: Chateau Chauniont Board o f Directors Tricia Aragon, City Engineer John Sarpa Gideon Kaufman Sunny Vann Michael C. Ireland, attorney for Chateau Du Mom Owners' Association P293 ' Construction Gate #2Â· Exit / GENCRALITAI NOTES --9 Point (with fiagger) 1 r--, 2 tr Limit of Disturbance / ~ -_ ~/ E /- - Construction Fence with . Screening ... 42 3. f Â»ry-03 1.1. â€ž.- ' 1Â¥4. - .. . / PUBpÂ¢ DI'ROVEÂ¥[NTS NOTEÂ· / i 00Â»â€¢.w............-.- i MAT OR I â€¢02 Â· I. , ---*I--.--0- CO/Cret/ lm: - m SHALLOWUTH ITY NO Tr.. Waihout :&Y =27=- Ii. li ~- 3 ou.Auou,â€¢oc,DOG. 1 1 Dulnpt'.rs . \ =====delpro.low f t::1'5219 . -*-*-*-,- ~ rE. - --- - Construction Gate #1 - ~~ Â· mitâ„¢PEEB-ND if .'E 4 4 + * Job Toilet: . CM.,c.u cll.-0147 looce 21 0 Â· i Entry Point (with (!agger) ,, 11...11.70 - 101 4 i N job-,ra.u , ~_ Access into Chateau Â·h.,11 .- A Emergi. cy Egress/, : 4~,~~~ -'' -' / ' -, , re,nain open y a Wther n A AÂ«Â· a Gate Sn,â‚¬,44 --U...1 â€ž.,-, r - ............ '04~.Due,~rAW *V jÂ» 4 5 CON:W,LIAâ€¢.1 R.9 m 8 1 .......... 1 # ====J I ..1......0. / 1 Tower Crane ~ Turn.,round M--*w- ~ Location i ...,â„¢==1-- . ~, Entry Point ....n'. -~Miâ€ž..x . < Iwith flagger) 1 J /44.., Jut-- q .ORTH/(COMOOMÂ»011= . / i i .C..1,4'.6 535.2 - U / -- ..:1:1.f:.1 -. -.t --4-. , 1- ...1. ''.r- C .--- Â·Â·1 -1--, 1.â€¢ 1-- , 5.Conv.C.........0 --- ./.332,45 - .............r ~ Emeroency Egress/Aciess Gate l -1-k- -4 Z i . I. 5 ----- AS.%00 - At ~ ,â€¢Wil~ 1*40 9=2 -~: *XEGE Fence barrier wl/1 be adjusted , ~ . - for ROW work 05 needed @22 suilace paiatkdparunq tot ~ beturnedovertoowner | Sky Hotel approx 19 months into & 1.1 8 W m g con:tructton Construction Management Â° ~ Construction Parking is Off Site at Site Logistics Plan Snowmass Intercept Lot- Shuttle .U.4. 504 Â£ Service shall be provided by -*EM;~1Â£Â£Mij-6- Cm=Zâ€¢ H#selder forall Suby. Haselden Construction 4%â‚¬9=. ain-Lâ€¢Oilk)~ U.â€¢111,4 mâ€¢ir .:. . ' _1-9CiÂ¥~ t- 314.'Ir" ---:-6- ..'-:-:.4. -- p " 4.------ C -'--".'"'-*" AhfÂ¢N Ai )11'94.33,: 9.3 S'Â¥Ja S Nell,AbliSNOO *6/d JXHIBIT EL I 'cl Jessica Garrow R)&'(, Comoult- mk~Nit om: John Corcoran <john@aspenalps.com> .ent: Friday, August 14, 2015 9:19 AM To: Jessica Garrow Subject: Sky Hotel P&Z meeting Jessica, As you know, the Aspen Alps Condominium Association has been closely followingthe redevelopment application of the Sky Hotel. At this time, the Association has no objection to, and is generally supportive of, the application as has been presented thus far. This is separate from the Aspen Alps 100 building and any issues they may have regarding their parking areas, easements, etc. If you have any questions, or wish to discuss, please contact me on my cell phone 970-948-5153. Thanks. John John J. Corcoran, CMCA General Manager Aspen Alps Condominium Association r970) 925-7820 ww.aspenalps.com 1 EXHIBIT [-1 1 /72 5871/2 Grand Cascade Way NTurn Key Grand Junction, CO 81501 0 970-314-4888 -Consulting, LLC August 18, 2015 Jody Edwards Klein Cote, Edwards Citron LLC (Client) 101 South Mill Street, Ste 200 Aspen, CO 81611 Re: Chateau Chaumont Condo Access Evaluation (Aspen, CO) Sky Hotel - Planned Development Detailed Review Application Construction Management Plan Dear Jody: This letter provides technical support to your letter dated 8/13/15 to the City of Aspen Planning and Zoning Commission regarding the "Sky Hotel - Planned Development Detailed Review Application." Your letter provides a good description of the proposed Sky Construction Management Plan (CMP), so this letter does not include the CMP description. I reviewed the following documents as part of the CMP proposal evaluation: â€¢ Sky Hotel CMP, dated June 23, 2015, including "Construction Management Site Logistics Plan." â€¢ Your letter to Aspen Planning & Zoning Commission, dated 8/13/15 This Evaluation references the following federal, state, and local documents: 1. Aspen Municipal Code - Title 21 - Streets, Sidewalks and Other Public Places (Code) 2. TRB Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices (MUTCD) 3. AASHTO A Policy on Geometric Design of Highways and Streets (Green Book) 4. AASHTO Guide for the Planning, Design, and Operation of Pedestrian Facilities (Guide) Access .~1//3///A~~~A, -~ 0 W *411 The City owns a 20-ft wide right of way between the Sky Hotel ~~NliallfUMAA E and the Chateau Chaumont, and then there is approximately -- 7-ft of private property along the north side for parking. The i following image shows the existing access of the public alley . ..I.... (Dean Street) to/from S. Original Street. The width of the 3 :l~* 1 access (16-ft) is constrained by the building electric meters on 6 9-. 1- i the left and the utility pedestal on the right. The travel way is 16-ft on the east end of Dean Street, which is adequate for the ,-:-<*t#iM~ 1=.%Â» current one-way eastbound traffic flow. A::ti: Page 1 of 4 However, this width is not reasonable for the two-way traffic proposed in the CMP, including construction materials delivery vehicles. Per definitions in Code Section 21.04.010, a public right of way is devoted to public use, and an alley is a public way having less width than a street and designated for access to the rear of the buildings. In this case, the Chateau Chaurnont Lodge has units with primary and singular access to/from Dean Street. There is not any other access to other public right of way. As such, Dean Street must be allowed to accommodate all the various modes of travel that use it. Code Section 21.04.060 indicates that restrictive temporary construction within public right of way shall not occur without prior approval of the City Engineer. Code Section 21.12.120 states that street closures are not permitted, but lane closures could be allowed under the following conditions: â€¢ Traffic Control Plan implemented per the MUTCD â€¢ Hours of work in compliance with Title 18 and/or Title 8 Code Section 21.12.130 indicates that pedestrian barricades are required and allowed in alleys. Code Section 21.12.170 requires that construction activities allow passage of emergency vehicles. Code Section 21.12.350 states, "All work shall be performed in such a way as to cause minimum inconvenience and restriction to the public and both pedestrian and vehicular traffic." Code Section 21.26.020 provides complete street principals that ensure that transportation improvements are planned, designed, and constructed to encourage walking, bicycling, and transit usage while promoting safe operations for all users. There are technical requirements associated with the guiding principles stated in the Code. Green Book Section 4.3 indicates that vehicle lane widths range from 9-ft to 12-ft, with 12-ft as the predominant width. The 9-ft width is appropriate for low-volume roads in rural and residential areas. Guide Section 3.2.3 indicates that the minimum sidewalk width is 4-ft. Where sidewalks are less than 5-ft, then passing spaces of 5-ft should be provided to accommodate wheelchairs. MUTCD Chapter 6D states the following: â€¢ Pedestrians should not be led into conflicts with vehicles, equipment, and operations - or vehicles moving through or around the work site. â€¢ Pedestrians should be provided with a convenient and accessible path that replicates as nearly as practical the most desirable characteristics of the existing sidewalk. â€¢ Consideration should be made to separate pedestrian movements from both worksite activity and vehicular traffic â€¢ Minimum sidewalk width in work zone = 5-ft, with wheelchair passing spaces every 200-ft Therefore, the absolute minimum width of a two-way public travel way would be 22-ft (two 9-ft lanes + one 4-ft sidewalk), but this width leaves no room for shoulders, buffers between pedestrian and vehicle users, or extra width for construction trucks with wide loads or extended mirrors. The desirable minimum width would be 25-ft (two 10-ft lanes + one 5-ft sidewalk). There is neither the required right of way width nor the physical width at the east end of Dean Street to accommodate two-way vehicular traffic and pedestrians. It would not Page 2 of 4 I . be possible to provide this width by utility relocation. The meters on the south side of the alley are part of the building and cannot be moved. The pedestal on the north side could be relocated within Original Street right of way, but this would push it deeper into the alignment of the parking spaces on Dean Street. In summary, Dean Street is not wide enough to safely accommodate two-way vehicular traffic and a sidewalk. The CMP should be revised accordingly. In addition to width, there would be another constraint associated with the proposed vehicle turn-around area near Construction Gate #1. It is not clear if the turnaround would be flagger controlled or if it would be wide enough to accommodate vehicles that would use the alley. As a minimum, the CMP should address these questions with additional narrative on traffic control, and with vehicle turning diagrams shown in the space proposed. There is a high potential for "gridlock" in the alley if inbound vehicles get packed into the alley such that outbound vehicles do not have sufficient space to turn around and head out. In summary, the currently proposed CMP does not appear to be feasible in light of the federal, state, and local requirements associated with safe passage of vehicular and pedestrian traffic. Implementation of the CMP would adversely affect the Chateau Chaumont Lodge and its residents in terms of access and traffic flow Sincerely, Â·4 14 Barrie L. Hudson, P.E. ,Â¥O,:0â€¢â€¢â€¢0. <4,# President ehpjEIGH 42.Â®HX n N (Pt M ~ 0 35278 9} 88 Page 3 of 4 , CInÂ·truct,Bn Gateâ€¢2 - Extt f qt,q8342Tiwl,ri N Point Â»th fl.gger) ' 7--- . Limit of Disturbant, i ; . , Constiuction Fence with , I-. ---.--r-â€ž81-4------ @ 8 0 . Screening ' - ,- . 3 r-Â· -.+ -27..1. ig._.22*\1 i -3,<~ -.:2 i , 1#13*SA *NI -1 -# k + -5&91 %3.4.-29*:*27?ZLQ;/ ~2~1-5NM11/"Lk :---1 4~I- ,&--/ -I--........4- 1 11/:1 1 1 'W,VN - / \ -1. *./.- , 1 0 / A C H F Â· - 7 1 514.,1 e,mrn, rrY Nole - W..1,1â€¢,It ki.*A'*.J ' 6 fil , #11 1 1 / 0 1 it ==:=<99:3-~â€ž- -- 1 1-1 ."A'..'./lowTL-Â« == 1 6 i ifill riqi,91 4 1 C'REE._Inarzâ€¢ P] Fli N e */ LA/**64-- i i ijit " 11 0--Z--4. f -Al 211ZL.saLIUE . Contâ€¢rualon Gate F Â· i/ ' .,9 4~1 ' ~ t-&Â» , O..-Cll./7./.1 . L.1 . #L Â· 1 &Â« ; Entn, Point (with flagger] ~ / hfÂ· - 0.~.-_kk-Lrollt-' u~._ / / --I -~ I' --1 ft !111\ IL #42 3-%. , AÂ«*,I,ntÂ¢, Charâ€¢,Au .16,11 V 5 Cmâ€¢â€¢rm .ry LgreW --1- f j .I---,2 it to -Ir,CT.TJF.#jv,-'.-- f AÂ«-A Gate , --1~ 1 I re,na,nopen I ill 1 3 w d L 4. .Â·Â£ 1/ 9 / 40 # ...."292*4~ -M: .-4...... : PAC , f Tower Crane , E. 4, 1 Â»,2 -1 Location T.D . + Ent,v Point ....... 5.2.4.- 1 , I -Y -_ w - 1-ith flaqger) --------- .--a...1.- â€¢Cmi,",4 / 1< 8 f i 1 ==n 6,\ f / . , V-,4 ' =* --t.... â€¢-f---f-,4 a ......... ~ 5///Â¥/3,0lfUUMIN - â€ž---. 10-r,ent, Egeâ€ž#Acoâ€ž16- ~~--------~.- -'7~# \ 34 E..Ir hirri.wilit he adjuÂ·0,0 1 6 Â¢ 3 R -7 m o. 5 fo, ROW work di needed Â· ~ Sui fair pnr.ltel furkinq tot r 8 be turrled vrer to Owner ~ Sky Hotel ~ 3* 9 appr'.10 month. into I Conâ€¢Â·t. uct,â€¢Wâ€¢ Construction Management ' Construchon Parking is off F t Site LogistiCS Plan Snow,now. Intercept Lot Â· Shuttle -Mal[MAÂ·C Service t.hall be provided by ~ C.,_* Hasetdon for a SubÂ· Haselden Construction ' P:Cliond ty Unill 1Â¥nldED'100 r1 7.brr, 0,3 D Jo * 86ed EXHIBIT - FT~ 4Â¢icant ker-enifted Sle LAW OFFICES GIDEON I. KAUFMAN* TELEPHONE HAL S. DISHLER " OF (970) 925-8166 PATRICK D. MCALLISTER KAUFMAN, DISHLER & MCALLISTER, P.C. FACSIMILE (970) 925-1090 Â· ALSO ADMITTED IN MARYLAND Â·Â· ALSO ADMITTED IN TEXAS 315 EAST HYMAN AVENUE SUITE 305 ASPEN, COLORADO 81611 August 18, 2015 Via Email to Jessica.Garrow@cityofaspen.coin I Via Email to Jim.lrue@citvofaspen.coni c/o Jessica Garrow c/o Jim True City of Aspen Community Development Department I 130 S, Galena Street, 3rd Floor ~ Aspen, CO 81611 1 Re: Aspen Club Lodge Properties, LLC ("ACLP") response to letter from Chateau Chamont Condominium Association ("CC") regarding Planned Development Detailed Review application for the Sky Hotel (the "Application") Dear Jessica and Jim: As you know, we represent ACLP in connection with the above referenced matter. This letter is intended to address the issues raised in the August 13, 2015 letter from Joseph Edwards on behalf'of CC. CC raises four different areas of concern with ACLP's Construction Management Plan ("CMP"). Those concerns are: (a) Access to CC during the construction process and parking; (b) Encroachment into CC's airspace by a proposed tower crane to be used; (c) Traffic flow during construction in the Dean Alley; and (d) Concerns regarding the construction schedule. 1 ./ I. :A. - - --+ ' 4 ..4 , t, , General Comments First and foremost, detailed review of the CMP is not within the purview o f the Planning & Zoning Commission ("P&Z). It is and has always been within the purview ofthe City engineering department. Simply because the approving ordinance (39-2014) makes reference to the CMP does not change that. P&Z's authority with respect to a Detailed i Review Application is set forth in Code Â§26.445.070. To the extent that any of the issues , identified iii that section relate to CC's complaints, they would fall within Code Â§26.445.070(G)-Engineering Design Standards. That section provides that the plans * submitted comply with Title 29 ofthe Code, which contains the City's engineering design standards. A detailed review of those standards is conducted by the City Engineering Department. That section clearly provides that the plans submitted need only provide sufficient detail to determine ifthe design concepts comply with the intent ofthe I engineering standards, but do not need to be detailed construction plans. The City has confirmed that we have met Ordinance 39 requirements for the submittal of our draft CMP. ACLP believes that the plans submitted to date meet that requirement. The issues now raised by CC are well beyond the scope of P&Z's purview and are the kinds of issues that are commonly dealt with by the engineering department through the building permit ~ process when a more detailed CMP is submitted. Section 7 of Ordinance 39 Planned Development Detailed Review requires items to be included as part of the Planned Development, for example: (1) an existing and proposed Landscaping Plan, identifying trees with diameters and values; (2) a draft Construction Management Plan; (3) a snow storage and snow shedding plan. Snow is not permitted to shed off roofs onto neighboring properties. Demonstrate that any snow which sheds off roofs will remain on-site; (4) an updated and final Transportation Impact Analysis (TIA), including a monitoring plan; (5) a final design plan for the Spring Street cul-du-sac and bump out, as outlined in Section 9.5 ofthis Ordinance. All of these items are intended for review and approval by the appropriate City departments. The P&Z does not review landscape plans, snow storage, cul-du-sac design, or a draft ofthe Construction Management Plan. The clear intent was for the appropriate departments to have an opportunity to review these items so that when a building permit application is filed, the applicant will have already received the input from the appropriate department, so as to expedite the building permit process. The fact that the Construction Management Plan issues are reserved for the Engineering Department is supported by the existence of the Engineering Department Construction Management Manual which addresses the issues raised by Mr. Edwards in his August 13, 2015 letter. Second, CC repeatedly refers to Dean alley as Dean Street. The City has continually i confirmed that it is an alley and not a street. CC also asserts that ACLP has acknowledged that CC has a prescriptive easement for ingress and egress over our property. Both statements are untrue. The City has never treated Dean Street as a street and ACLP has never acknowledged a prescriptive easement. The only easement acknowledged is the 2 easement that ACLP has agreed to grant to CC upon completion of construction of the project. Access The issues raised by CC on access are the very kinds of issues that should be addressed, and are usually addressed by the engineering department and the fire department, not the P&Z. CC first argues that the historical flow of traffic through the Dean Alley will be altered during construction in a manner that is unreasonable. It is true that during construction, a portion ofthe alley will be closed and the east/west portion of the alley ' will be temporarily converted to two way traffic with a turnaround area. While that may cause some minor inconvenience to CC, it doesn't affect its' members access in any 1 material way. CC is the least impacted neighbor and uses the smallest amount of the alley for its access. CC fails to mention that there will also be personnel to direct traffic during construction activities. Likewise, a pedestrian walk way will be built that allows for safe and reasonable pedestrian access to CC owners and guests. CC's assertion that a reasonable walkway would be too large to allow safe vehicle passage in the remainder of the alley is pure speculation. These question of what is reasonable and what is safe should not be made by P&Z, but by the appropriate departments and agencies. Tower Crane CC also suggests that the project cannot be approved because a crane used during construction will encroach into CC's airspace. First, ACLP believes that construction can be accomplished without encroaching into CC's airspace. Moreover, this is an issues that is not for determination by the P&Z. It is, at most, a potential private property dispute. If and when such a dispute arises CC will have the opportunity to exercise its legal rights in the courts. Traffic Flow CC asserts that Section 9.5 ofthe approving ordinance requires that the direction of traffic in the alley shall remain the same as today--entry from Durant and exit on ' Original. There is no question that at the conclusion of the project that will be true, however that was never contemplated during construction and the record makes that clear. Everyone has been aware for some time that the traffic pattern would be changed during construction. In addition, Section 9 of Ordinance 39 Engineering Department, it contemplates engineering review for compliance with engineering standards. 3 ' Schedule ACLP can adhere to the schedule dates contained in the Ordinance. 1 In closing, we believe that, with the exception of the temporary closing of access through ~ the Sky Hotel property during construction, which is a private property rights matter, and a small section of the alley, which is a matter for the Engineering Department and Fire Department, neither are under the purview of the Planning and Zoning Commission. The I issues raised by Mr. Edwards in his letter of August 13, 2015 can be adequately addressed by our contractor, and will be reflected in our final construction management plan to be submitted with the project's building permit application. Jessica: Would you please distribute this letter to the Planning and Zoning Commission as I do not have their email addresses. Very truly yours, Kaufmam<IDifhler & McAllister, P.C. A Pro]Essierilll Corporation j By: / Af j Gic/y on aufinan 4 hy EXHIBIT E71 AFFIDAVIT OF PUBLIC NOTICE REQUIRED BY SECTION 26.304.060 (E),ASPEN LAND USE CODE ADDRESS OF PROPERTY 7-0 1 g DJ/Â«A f- ~ Ave l<ki I.131el ~ , Aspen, CO SCHEDULED PUBLIC HEARING DATE: 4*,29- 11? , 201~ STATE OF COLORADO ) ) SS. County of Pitkin ) I, A\Oe,/1 Ace,oc- (name, please print) being or representing an Applicant to the City of Aspen, Colorado, hereby personally certify that I have complied with the public notice requirements of Section 26.304.060 (E) of the Aspen Land Use Code in the following manner: >r' Publication of notice: By the publication in the legal notice section of an official paper or a paper of general circulation in the City of Aspen at least fifteen (15) days prior to the public hearing. A copy of the publication is attached hereto. Posting of notice: By posting of notice, which form was obtained from the Community Development Department, which was made of suitable, waterproof materials, which was not less than twenty-two (22) inches wide and twenty-six (26) inches high, and which was composed of letters not less than one inch in height. Said notice was posted at least fifteen (15) days prior to the public hearing on the day of , 20 , to and including the date and time of the public hearing. A photograph of the posted notice (sign) is attached hereto. Mailing of notice. By the mailing of a notice obtained from the Community Development Department, which contains the information described in Section 26.304.060(E)(2) of the Aspen Land Use Code. At least fifteen (15) days prior to the public hearing, notice was hand delivered or mailed by first class postage prepaid U.S. mail to all owners of property within three hundred (300) feet of the property subject to the development application. The names and addresses of property owners shall be those on the current tax records o f Pitkin County as they appeared no more than sixty (60) days prior to the date of the public hearing. A copy of the owners and governmental agencies so noticed is attached hereto. Neighborhood Outreach: Applicant attests that neighborhood outreach, summarized and attached, was conducted prior to the first public hearing as required in Section 26.304.035, Neighborhood Outreach. A copy of the neighborhood outreach summary, including the method of public notification and a copy of any documentation that was presented to the public is attached hereto. (continued on next page) U Mineral Estate Owner Notice. By fae certified mailing of notice, return receipt j requested, to affected mineral estate owners by at least thirty (30) days prior to the date scheduled for the initial public hearing on the application of development. The names and addresses of mineral estate owners shall be those on the current tax records of Pitkin County. At a minimum, Subdivisions, SPAs or PUDs that create more than one lot, new Planned Unit Developments, and new Specially Planned Areas, are subject to this notice requirement. Rezoning or text amendment. Whenever the official zoning district map is in any way to be changed or amended incidental to or as part of a general revision of this Title, or whenever the text o f this Title is to be amended, whether such revision be made by repeal of this Title and enactment of a new land use regulation, or otherwise, the requirement of an accurate survey map or other sufficient legal description of, and the notice to and listing of names and addresses of owners of real property in the area of the proposed change shall be waived. However, the proposed zoning map shall be available for public inspection in the planning agency during all business hours for fifteen (15) days prior to the public hearing on such amendments. ct i U- V ,#Jgnature The foregoing "Affidavit ofNotice" was acknowledged before me this,~Â£~~~ay ~~ of ~-1 1 1 , 20.16 by KAÂ» (m..tÂ¥ WITNESS MY HAND AND OFFICIAL SEAL L My commission expires: <k| 16 l 1 (p KAREN REED PATTERSON , , NOTARY PUBLIC STATE OF COLORADO 04/4 20,4 #R#441//99/ - NOTARY ID #19964002767 Notary Public My Commission Expires February 14 2016 _ 1 ' Â·Â· / ATTACHMENTS AS APPLICABLE: â€¢ COPY OF THE PUBLICATION â€¢ PHOTOGRAPH OF THE POSTED NOTICE (SIGN) â€¢ LIST OF THE OWNERS AND GOVERNMENTAL AGENCIES NOTICED BY MAIL â€¢ APPLICANT CERTIFICATION OF MINERAL ESTAE OWNERS NOTICE AS REQUIRED BY C.R.S. Â§24-65.5-103.3 L J J NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING RE: 709 E Durant Ave (Sky Hotel) Public Hearing: August 18,2015,4:30 PM Meeting Location: City Hall, Sister Cities Room 130 S. Gatena St., Aspen, CO 81611 Project Location: 709 E Durant Ave (Sky Hotel) ~ Legal Description: PID # 273718280001, Wood- / stone Inn Condominiums, according to the Condo. -- minium Map thereof filed March 11,1983 in Plat S Book 14 at Page 45 through 49, inclusive at Re- Applicant: Aspen Club Lodge Properties LLC, ception No. 248609 and as further defined and de- 1101 30th Street. NW, Suite 150. Washington, DC scribed in the Condominium Declaration for Wood- 20007 stone Inn Condominiums recorded March 11,1983 in Book 441 at Page 814 at Reception No 248608: More Information: For further information relat- together with a non-exclusive easement and right- ed to the project, contact Jessica Garrow at the of-way recorded in Book 327 at Page 777: and to- City of Aspen Community Development Depart- gether with Encroachment License Agreements re- ment, 130 S. Gatena St., Aspen, CO, (970) corded in Book 316 at Page 232, in Book 425 at 429.2780, Jessica.Garrow@cityofaspen.com. Page 907. in Book 425 at Page 913, in Book 425 at Page 919, and in Book 498 at Page 909 Published in the Aspen Times Weekly July 30, 2015. (11398435) Description: The applicant is proposng to rede A. velop the property with a mixed-use lodge building consisting of lodging, affordable housing, and commercial space. This is the final step in the land 42 use review process. Council review and approval was received on February 9, 2014 by Ordinance 39, Series 2015. Land Use Reviews Reg: Planned Development - Detail Review, Final Commercial Design Review Decision Making Body: Planning and Zoning Commission 4 . J J Ma,11 2,â€¢. ,Â·,DI-, - Â·All regular meeting items begin at 12:00 p.m.,or as soon thereafter as the conduct of business at- lows. Check agenda at htto://Ditkincountv.conVCalendar.aspx or call 920-5200 for meeting times for special meetings. Â·Copies of the full text of any resolution(s) and or- dinance(s) referred to are available during regular business hours (8:30 - 4:30) in the Clerk and Re- corder's office, 530 East Main Street, Suite 101, Aspen, Colorado 81611 or al httg:#DitkincountÂ¥.conVCalendar.@.50% NOTICE OF APPLICATIONS TO BE CONSID- 1 \ 1 ERED BY THE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT ~ DIRECTOR: RE:Hundertmark Activity Envelooe and Site L U AFFIDAVIT OF PUBLIC NOTICE REQUIRED BY SECTION 26.304.060 (E), ASPEN LAND USE CODE ADDRESS OF PROPERTY: -709 efir perÂ»Â»tr AVa . , Aspen, CO SCHEDULED PUBLIC HEARING DATE: /N-Â»iXT 12> STATE OF COLORADO ) ) SS. County of Pitkin ) 1 Â«:UU-f vÂ«/6/ (name, please print) being or representing an Applicant to the City of Aspen. Colorado, hereby personally certify that I have complied with the public notice requirements of Section 26.304.060 (E) of the Aspen Land Use Code in the following manner: Publication of notice: By the publication in the legal notice section of an official paper or a paper of general circulation in the City of Aspen at least fifteen (15) days prior to the public hearing. A copy of the publication is attached hereto. Posting of notice: By posting of notice, which form was obtained from the Community Development Department, which was made of suitable, waterproof materials. which was not less than twenty-two (22) inches wide and twenty-six (26) inches high, and which was composed of letters not less than one inch in height. Said notice was posted at least fifteen (15) days prior to the public hearing on the day of , 20 , to and including the date and time of the public hearing. A photograph of the posted notice (sign) is attached hereto. V~ Mailing of notice. By the mailing of a notice obtained from the Community Development Department, which contains the information described in Section 26.304.060(E)(2) of the Aspen Land Use Code. At least fifteen (15) days prior to the public hearing, notice was hand delivered or mailed by first class postage prepaid U.S. mail to all owners of property within three hundred (300) feet of the property subject to the development application. The names and addresses of property owners shall be those on the current tax records of Pitkin County as they appeared no more than sixty (60) days prior to the date of the public hearing. A copy of the owners and governmental agencies so noticed is attached hereto. Neighborhood Outreach: Applicant attests that neighborhood outreach, summarized and attached, was conducted prior to the first public hearing as required in Section 26.304.035, Neighborhood Outreach. A copy of the neighborhood outreach summary, including the method of public notification and a copy of any documentation that was presented to the public is attached hereto. (continued on next page) C Mineral Estate Owner Notice. By the certified mailing of notice, return receipt requested, to affected mineral estate owners by at least thirty (30) days prior to the date scheduled for the initial public hearing on the application of development. The names and addresses of mineral estate owners shall be those on the current tax records of Pitkin County. At a minimum, Subdivisions, SPAs or PUDs that create more than one lot, new Planned Unit Developments, and new Specially Planned Areas, are subject to this notice requirement. Rezoning or text amendment. Whenever the official zoning district map is in any way to be changed or amended incidental to or as part of a general revision of this Title, or whenever the text ofthis Title is to be amended, whether such revision be made by repeal of this Title and enactment of a new land use regulation, or otherwise, the requirement of an accurate survey map or other sufficient legal description of, and the notice to and listing of names and addresses of owners of real property in the area of the proposed change shall be waived. However, the proposed zoning map shall be available for public inspection in the planning agency during all business hours for fifteen (15) days prior te,the public hearing on such amendments. Signe*re~/6/ The *regoing "Affidavit of Notice" wa**cknowledged before me this (14 3 , 2045, by b U M Af VAM Fl WITNESS MY HAND AND OFFICIAL SEAL TARA L. NELSON NOTARY PUBLIC STATE OF COLORADO My commiD.ipp expires: 0117*11~19-0' NOTARY ID 20014030017 MY COMMISSION EXPIRES 09/26/2017 //tÂ»ll-Nel*MA Notary Public ATTACHMENTS AS APPLICABLE: â€¢ COPY OF THE PUBLICATION â€¢ PHOTOGRAPH OF THE POSTED NOTICE (SIGN) â€¢ LIST OF THE OWNERS AND GOVERNMENTAL AGENCIES NOTICED BY MAIL â€¢ APPLICANT CERTIFICATION OF MINERAL ESTAE OWNERS NOTICE AS REQUIRED BY C.R.S. Â§24-65.5-103.3 NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING RE: 709 E Durant Ave (Sky Hotel) l1lL CITY OF AspEN City of Aspen Public Hearing: August 18, 2015, 4:30 PM 130 S. Galena Street, Aspen, CO 81611 p: (970) 920.5000 Meeting Location: City Hall, Sister Cities Room f: (970) 920.5197 130 S. Galena St., Aspen, CO 81611 w: www.aspenpitkin.com Project Location: 709 E Durant Ave (Sky Hotel) Legal Description: PID # 273718280001, Woodstone Inn Condominiums, according to the Condominium Map thereof filed March 11, 1983 in Plat Book 14 at Page 45 through 49, inclusive at Reception No. 248609 and as further defined and described in the Condominium Declaration for Woodstone Inn Condominiums recorded March 11, 1983 in Book 441 at Page 814 at Reception No. 248608; together with a non-exclusive easement and right-of-way recorded in Book 327 at Page 777; and together with Encroachment License Agreements recorded in Book 316 at Page 232, in Book 425 at Page 907, in Book 425 at Page 913, in Book 425 at Page 919, and in Book 498 at Page 909 uescription: The applicant is proposing to redevelop the property with a mixed-use lodge building consisting of lodging, affordable housing, and commercial space. This is the final step in the land use review process. Council review and approval was received on February 9, 2014 by Ordinance 39, Series 2015. Land Use Reviews Requested: Planned Development - Detail Review, Final Commercial Design Review Decision Making Body: Planning and Zoning Commission Applicant: Aspen Club Lodge Properties LLC, 110130th Street, NW, Suite 150, Washington, DC 20007 More Information: For further information related to the project, contact Jessica Garrow at the City of Aspen Community Development Department, 130 S. Galena St., Aspen, CO, (970) 429.2780, Jessica.Garrow@cityofaspen.com. SARGENT ELIZABETH VAUSE FAMILY TRUST ANDINA SUPER LLC -- BOX 4450 3020 PLAZA DE MONTE PO BOX 1177 )EN, CO 816124450 LAS VEGAS, NV 89102 MANLY NSW AUSTRALIA 1655, SMALLPAGE LEASING LLC BANKS LIVING TRUST THOMAS VICTORIA 6316 HUMPHREYS ST PO BOX 242 835 E DURANT AVE #1 HARAHAN, LA 70123 MIDLAND, TX 79702 ASPEN, CO 81611 CHATEAU CHAUMONT 17/18 LLC MAKINEN MICHAEL & WINNIFRED B POLLOCK RANDALL LLC 7 MCCULLOUGH PL 851 UNIVERSITY AVE PO BOX 950 RYE, NY 10580 PALO ALTO, CA 94301 ASPEN, CO 81612 CAVES KAREN W HENDRICKS SIDNEY J & YOLANDE EVERHAi RUBY RICHARD L TRUST 1 BARRENGER CT 6614 LAKEVILLE RD 30150 TELEGRAPH RD STE 300 NEWPORT BEACH, CA 92660 PETALUMA, CA 94954-9256 BINGHAM FARMS, MI 48025 RANDALL WILLIAM C DDS SOUTHEAST HARBOR FARMS LLLP HE REINERT HOLDINGS CORP 10303 ORCHID LN 51 ARCH WAY 161 MAC LAREN ST PINE RIVER, MN 56474 CALISTOGA, CA 94515 OTTOWA ONTARIO CANADA K2P 0K8, CHEN LINDA P BELL NORMAN D KANN RONALD 215 E 79TH ST #4E 215 E 79TH ST #4E 217 OHARA MANOR DR NEWYORK, NY 10021 NEW YORK, NY 10075 PITTSBURGH, PA 15238 DENNIS IRREVOCABLE TRUST PON FAMILY ASPEN VALERIE ASPEN LLC 77 MONTEREY PINE 2633 RICHARDSON DR #10-D 150 E 69TH ST #20B NEW PORT COAST, CA 92657 CHARLOTTE, NC 28211 NEWYORK, NY 10021 SHELLIST MARTIN SHEPHERD BETH ANN SCHOETTLE SHARON 1707 1/2 POST OAK BLVD #262 11504 CANTON DR 17071/2 POST OAK BLVD #179 HOUSTON, TX 77056 STUDIO CITY, CA 91604 HOUSTON, TX 77056 FOXS LEGACY LLC LEBOVITS & MOSES CARMAN PETER 101 S MILL ST #200 10318 GLENBARR AVE 700 S UTE AVE #808 ASPEN, CO 81611 LOS ANGELES, CA 90064 ASPEN, CO 81611 NDMARK AMERICA INC CUB CLUB LLC ANDERSON ROBERT M & LOUISE E S UTE AVE 1212 AVENUE OF THE AMERICAS 1021 23RD ST ASPEN, CO 81611 NEW YORK, NY 10036 CHETEK, WI 54728 SANDIFER C W JR TRUST SANDIFER DICKSIE L TRUST COUCH CATHERINE ANNE -'0 LINDEN DR 240 LINDEN DR PO BOX 7744 JLDER, CO 80304 BOULDER, CO 80304 ASPEN, CO 81612 GEOLFA GROUP LLC CORDUROY CRUISERS LLC CHATEAU CHAUMONT CONDO ASSOC PO BOX 3131 710 E DURANT AVE 421 G AABC CINNAMINSON, NJ 08077 ASPEN, CO 81611 ASPEN, CO 81611 KARICK LLC ASPEN SQUARE VENTURES LLP DURANT AH LLC 730 E DURANT AVE 602 E COOPER #202 PO BOX 4068 ASPEN, CO 81611 ASPEN, CO 81611 ASPEN, CO 81612 K&W PROPERTIES INC ROGENESS FAMILY TRUST ECCHYMOSIS LLC 728 W CANAL ST 3046 COLONY DR 4802 E 2ND ST # 2 NEW SMYRNA BEACH, FL 32168 SAN ANTONIO, TX 78230 LONG BEACH, CA 90803 ROSS JOHN F FRANZ NORBERT ALEXANDER BARGE RENE TRUST 7600 CLAYTON RD KAISERHOFSTR 15 408 31 ST ST SAINT LOUIS, MO 63117 FRANKFURT 60313 GERMANY, NEWPORT BEACH, CA 92663 VARADY LOTHAR M & CHERYL G AWALL350 LLC GRUENEWALD DAVID F REVOCABLE LIVING 5036 MAUNALANI CIR 350 BLANCA AVE 63 ROBINWOOD DR HONOLULU, HI 96816 TAMPA, FL 33606 LITTLE ROCK, AR 72227 SHNEIDERMAN BEN A TRUST 50% PREECE JENNIFER J TRUST 50% CHAIKEN WILLIAM 7710 WOODMONTAVE#1112 7710 WOODMONT AVE #1112 2030 S OCEAN DR APT 1723 BETHESDA, MD 20814 BETHESDA, MD 20814 HALLANDALE BEACH, FL 33009-6614 SATKUNAS THOMAS P WATERS JOSEPH D & LESLIE T ABRAMSON FAMILY REV TRUST 0096 HOPI 450 S ORIGINAL ST #2 181 SOUTH AVE CARBONDALE, CO 81623 ASPEN, CO 816112073 ALAMO, CA 94507 SOPRIS VENTURES LLC ROSS JOHN F SKILKEN STEVE & LYNNE 18818 TELLER AVE #130 7600 CLAYTON RD 383 S THIRD ST IRVINE, CA 92612 ST LOUIS, MO 63117 COLUMBUS, OH 43215 --RSCH BLANCHE TRUST 50% BERSCH ELLEN TRUST 50% BERSCH BLANCHE TRUST 2 YOAKUM DR 9642 YOAKUM DR 9642 YOAKUM DR BEVERLY HILLS, CA 90210 BEVERLY HILLS, CA 90210 BEVERLY HILLS, CA 90210 DAY ARTHUR S BLISS ELIOT & ANN BOHMONT LLC --07 BAY SHORE RD 19130 SYLVAN ST 1010 WATHAM ST LASOTA, FL 34234 RESEDA, CA 91335 BROOKHAVEN 16 LEXINGTON, MA 024218061 LAMONT ADA J WALLEN-OSTERAA REV LIVING TRUST SEGUIN WILLIAM L & MARILYN A 133 E 80TH ST 36 OCEAN VISTA PO BOX 4274 NEW YORK, NY 10075 NEWPORT BEACH, CA 92660 ASPEN, CO 816124274 BRONSON RICHARD L TRUST 50% BRONSON BONNIE L TRUST 50% HUNKE CARLTON J LVG TRST 4510 NE DELAMAR PL 4510 NE DELAMAR PL 408 N 1ST ST #507 LEES SUMMIT, MO 64064 LEES SUMMIT, MO 64064 MINNEAPOLIS, MN 55401 MJM AMENDED & RESTATED TRUST 81611 INVESTMENTS LLC CALGI RAYMOND D 1776 SOUTH LN PO BOX 1376 134 TEWKESBURY RD NORTHBROOK, IL 60062 ASPEN, CO 81612 SCARSDALE, NY 10583 SUMMERGREEN LLC PARTRIDGE JAMES J & JEAN C WEIGAND 122 LLC 715 E DURANT AVE #8 361 N AWAHNEE RD 301 N MAIN ST #600 ASPEN, CO 81611 LAKE FOREST, IL 60045 WICHITA, KS 67202 MAVROVIC ERNA CLIFFORD MRS MARGARET JOAN EAGLE POINT PROPERTIES LLC 530 E 72ND ST APT 15-C 146 WILD TIGER RD PO BOX 1749 NEWYORK, NY 10021 BOULDER, CO 80302 ASPEN, CO 81612 BRENNAN ADRIENNE REV FAM TRUST NEPSA INVESTMENT GROUP PTY LTD LE CLAIRVAUX 5 LLC 919 GARDENIA \NY 185 SPRING ST 1501 ARDMORE BLVD STE 400 CORONA DEL MAR, CA 92625 MELBOURNE VICTORIA PITTSBURGH, PA 15221 AUSTRALIA 3000, WEIGAND JOHNATHAN R TRUST 11/11/2014 CRAFT LESTER R JR EATON HUGH M 111 128 S OAKWOOD PO BOX 127 700 S UTE AVE WICHITA, KS 67218 BASALT, CO 81621 ASPEN, CO 81611 WALDRON K BRENT & CONSTANCE K CHAMBERLAIN BEVERLY M TRST CHATFIELD CHARLTON H PO BOX 4900 3548 N BROOKHAVEN 12 CORRIGAN LN ASPEN, CO 81612 TUCSON, AZ 85718 GREENWICH, CT 06831 -''ERAMIE CAPITAL HOLDINGS LLC 21/22 CHERAMIE ALAN A 1/22 INT CITY MARKET INC BOX 805 139 CHERAMIE LN 1014 VINE ST 7TH FL GOLDEN MEADOW, LA 70357 GOLDEN MEADOW, LA 70357 CINCINNATI , OH 45202 UG VENTURES LLC MITCHELL PROPERTY TRUST ELLERON CHEMICALS CORP -- BOX 2538 1 SOUTH ST #6 LEVEL 4 2101 WAUKEGAN RD#210 'EN, CO 81612 ST GEORGE PRIVATE HOSPITAL BANNOCKBURN, IL 60015 KOGARAH NSW AUSTRALIA 2217, OLSON DOUG BOWERS BARBARA PETERSON CHRISPY & JAMES E 2601 W LAFAYETTE RD 2601 W LAFAYETTE RD 613 MANGROVE THICKET BLVD ORONO, MN 55331 ORONO , MN 55331 PONTE VEDRA BEACH, FL 320810747 GORDON LEONARD & ELLEN KANTOR GARY L DAMASO PAULA M TRUST 12204 GALESVILLE DR 2816 VISTA DEL SOL PO BOX 1225 GAITHERSBURG, MD 20878 LAS VEGAS, NV 89120 ASPEN, CO 81612 WEISS KATHY REV TRUST CORNELISSEN TOM SEELIG-BROWN BARBARA 1609 COUNTY ROAD 112 4753 N SHORE DR 18 HARVEST LN CARBONDALE,CO 81623 MOUND, MN 55364-9607 LONG VALLEY, NJ 07853 KRAJIAN RON BATES NATHANIEL B TRUST UNCAPHER BILL 617 E COOPER AVE #114 PO BOX 9909 PO BOX 2127 ASPEN, CO 81611 ASPEN, CO 81612 LA JOLLA, CA 92038 BAISCH BARBARA D FELLA HENRY J BECKER ERNEST & KATHLEEN TRUST PO BOX 2127 1174THST 8090 S DURANGO DR #115 LA JOLLA, CA 92038 MANHATTAN BEACH, CA 90266 LAS VEGAS, NV 89113 ASPEN SQUARE 410 LP SIMUNOVICH JOHN & BRIGID COLETT- MILL IRON INVESTMENTS LLC 1407 YONGE ST #200 PO BOX 47 PO BOX 64 TORONTO ONTARIO DROGHEDA IRELAND CO LOUTH, CARLISLE, MA 01741 M4T IY7 CANADA, SHOHET CAROLYN S SMALL RESTON LLC CLARENDON IV LLC PO BOX 64 7311 ARROWOOD RD 2034 N CLARK ST CARLISLE, MA 01741 BETHESDA, MA 20817 CHICAGO, IL 60614 CLARENDON LLC SCHNEIDER ROBERT C BOWERS ANN S TRUST PO BOX 177 3003 S ONG ST 1664 WAVERLEY STREET BONDI JUNCTION NSW 1355 AUSTRALIA, AMARILLO, TX 79109 PALO ALTO, CA 94301 INEY J WALKER & GILLIAN GRIFFITH N MICHELLE & C PERRY JR SHIRK JAMES A & LINDA S ALMERSTON VILLAS 663 FOREST BLVD PO BOX 1549 RATHMINES INDIANAPOLIS, IN 46240 BLOOMINGTON, IL 61702 DUBLIN 6 IRELAND, EPSTEIN ASPEN TRUST LATTERMAN EARL M QPRT IONTACH LLC 0 RITTENHOUSE SQ #8A 5000 5TH AVE APT 306 PO BOX 21176 LADELPHIA, PA 19103 PITTSBURGH, PA 152322150 CATONSVILLE, MD 21228 WEINBERG JUDD A TRUST CRAZY WOMAN INVESTMENTS LLC IACONO FAMILY INVESTMENTS LLC 401 N MICHIGAN AVE #3050 304 S YELLOWSTONE 5845 E PLACITA DE LA ZUERENCIA CHICAGO, IL 606115515 MONTANA, MT 59047 TUCSON, AZ 85750-1242 CCI-ASPEN I LP DURANT MALL PROP LLC GREWAL JASJIT SINGH 800 BRAZOS ST #600 39 MOUNTAIN LAUREL DR 1 ECHO CANYON RD AUSTIN, TX 78701 ASPEN, CO 81611 PAGOSA SPRINGS, CO 81147 LEINER MICHAEL & ROSE ANN VALERIO JAMES & LANETTE LIVINGSTON DAVID R PO BOX 11539 PO BOX 1376 7100 GLADYS DR SE ASPEN, CO 81612 ASPEN, CO 81612 GRAND RAPIDS, MI 49546 BRADLEY EDWARD JR JACOBY JON E M AJAX MTN INVESTMENTS LLC 263 80TH ST PO BOX 3417 1101 30TH ST NW#150 BROOKLYN, NY 11209 LITTLE ROCK, AR 72203 WASHINGTON, DC 20007 BARBATA LAURA ANDERSON 1/3 BARBATA ELENA ANDERSON 1/3 BARBATA KATHLEEN ANDERSON 1/3 1600 TEXAS ST #1504 2040 FRANKLIN ST#507 2040 FRANKLIN ST #507 FORT WORTH, TX 76102 SAN FRANSISCO, CA 94109 SAN FRANSISCO, CA 94109 ASHTON SQUARE LLC SHEA SARAH H TRUST POLAK-ASPEN LLC 9204 EMMOTT RD 655 BREA CANYON RD 2828 N COUNTRY CLUB ROAD # 105 HOUSTON, TX 77040 WALNUT, CA 91789 TUCSON, AZ 85716 PECK ANTHONY Z & PAULA RICE GLORY US LLC HOFFMAN FRANCIS P 9171 WILSHIRE BLVD #400 9826 WEST BROADVIEW DRIVE 7577 FOREST BEACH RD BEVERLY HILLS, CA 90210 BAY HARBOR, FL 33154 WATERVLIET, MI 49098-8304 LEINER MICHAEL ASPEN SKIING COMPANY LLC COMBO VENTURE LLC PO BOX 11539 PO BOX 1248 2828 N HARWOOD ST #1700 ASPEN, CO 81612 ASPEN, CO 81612 DALLAS, TX 75201 M REAL ESTATE LLC DAVIS FAMILY TRUST OTTO GERDAU CO 0 PEACHTREE ST NE #3100 PO BOX 1909 700 S UTE AVE ATLANTA, GA 30309 RANCHO SANTA FE, CA 92067 ASPEN, CO 81611 CITY OF ASPEN SOLOMON FAMILY LIMITED PARTNERSHIP WHITE SNOW TRAIL LLC '-0 S GALENA ST 9313 RAPLEY PRESERVE DR 9313 RAPLEY PRESERVE DR EN, CO 81611 POTOMAC, MD 20854 POTOMAC, MD 20854 RULY HOLDINGS PTY LTD EAST DURANT LLC ASPEN MOUNTAIN PARTNERS LLC PO BOX 2964 323 N PACIFIC COAST HWY 730 E DURANT AVE ASPEN, CO 81612 SOLANA BEACH, CA 920751130 ASPEN, CO 81611 AJAX INVESTMENTS LLC MT ASPEN LLC ROBINSON F GEORGE JR 730 E DURANT AVE 730 E DURANT AVE #Gl PO BOX 7906 ASPEN, CO 81611 ASPEN, CO 81611 ASPEN, CO 81612 MAYER WILLIAM E M & M INVESTMENTS BOUTON REV TRUST PO BOX 4462 679 BRUSH CREEK RD 1170 SACRAMENTO ST #11A ASPEN,CO 81612 ASPEN, CO 81611 SAN FRANCISCO, CA 941081967 GODFREY BRUCE FAM TRST 50% GODFREY LESLI L FAM TRST 50% CROCKETT RUFUS 195 RUSSELL RD 1041 S HIGH ST PO BOX 3837 PRINCETON, NJ 08540 DENVER, CO 80209 ASPEN, CO 81612 730 DURANT G12 LLC PERRY JAMES H & MARGERY DEUTZ RED FLOWER PROP CO PTNSHP 1233 EDLIN PL PO BOX 3382 575 MADISON AVE #1006 MINNEAPOLIS. MN 55416 ASPEN, CO 81612-3382 NEW YORK, NY 100222511 450 ORIGINAL CONDO ASSOC 730 EAST DURANT CONDO ASSOC 777 UTE AT THE ASPEN ALPS ASSOC COMMON AREA COMMON AREA COMMON AREA AJAX CONDO ASSOC ASPEN ALPS CONDO ASSOC UTE TRAIL TOWNHOUSES CONDO ASSOC COMMON AREA PO BOX 1128 COMMON AREA , ASPEN, CO 81612 , CHATEAU DU MONT CONDO ASSOC CLARENDON CONDO ASSOC ARROWHEAD CONDO ASSOC 715 E DURANT AVE COMMON AREA COMMON AREA ASPEN, CO 81611 625 S WEST END ST ASPEN, CO 81611 PEN SQUARE CONDO ASSOC BLD B ASPEN SQUARE CONDO ASSOC BLD A ASPEN TOWNHOMES EAST MMON AREA COMMON AREA COMMON AREA E COOPER AVE E COOPER AVE 835 E DURANT AVE ASPEN, CO 81611 ASPEN, CO 81611 ASPEN, CO 81611 DURANT MALL CONDO ASSOC GLORY HOLE CONDO ASSOC LE CLAIRVAUX TOWNHOUSES CONDO ASSC -00 DOLORES WAY #B COMMON AREA COMMON AREA 1BONDALE, CO 816232251 525 S ORIGINAL ST 803 E DURANT AVE ASPEN, CO 81611 ASPEN, CO 81611 ASPEN ALPS WEST CONDO ASSOC JONA HOLDINGS INC GADA 777 REV LIVING TRUST 40% COMMON AREA PO BOX 163 PO BOX 2061 700 UTE AVE TORONTO ONTARIO CANADA M5K1 H6, ASPEN, CO 81612 ASPEN, CO 81611 COMBO VENTURE LLC 60% 283 ASPEN LLC SHIFRIN GEORGE 2828 N HARWOOD ST #1700 4809 COLE AVE #347 PO BOX 3434 DALLAS, TX 75201 DALLAS, TX 75205 BASALT, CO 81621 SEAY GERALD R JOSHUA & CO EQUITUS CAPITAL LLC 320 TANGIER AVE 300 S HUNTER ST 720 E DURANT # E8 PALM BEACH, FL 334803518 ASPEN, CO 81611 ASPEN, CO 816112071 WILSON JOSEPH B UND 50% INT SAVITT STEVEN KUMAGAI GLORIA 39 MOUNTAIN LAUREL DR 332 WESTWOOD DR N 332 WESTWOOD DR ASPEN, CO 81611 GOLDEN VALLEY, MN 55422 GOLDEN VALLEY, MN 55422 DIBRELL CHARLES G JR & FRANCES ASPEN KOEPPEL LLC BECKER EQUITIES LLC 24 ADLER CIR 2627 S BAYSHORE DRIVE # 806 8090 S DURANGO DR #115 GALVESTON, TX 77551-5828 MIAMI, FL 33133 LAS VEGAS, NV 89113 DIRKES PETER R WEAST FAMILY TRUST ASPEN WINGS PARTNERSHIP 324 FOXWOOD LN 614 CALLE MONTERA 3481 SHORE DR MILL NECK, NY 11765 ESCONDIDO, CA 920257957 EXCELSIOR, MN 55331 R & R INVESTMENTS BONCZEK ROBERT R UNCAPHER BILL TRUSTEE 15238 OAK VALLEY RD PO BOX 2896 PO BOX 2127 RAMONA, CA 92065 CHAPEL HILL, NC 275152896 LA JOLLA, CA 92038 REICH MELVIN L TRUST 80% REICH DANIEL S TRUST 20% DALY CAROL Y REV TRUST 4609 SEASHORE DR 6 RINCON ST 617 E COOPER NEWPORT BEACH, CA 92663 IRVINE, CA 92702 ASPEN, CO 81611 VARADO-RIOS HECTOR AJAX SLOPESIDE LLC PECKHAM THOMAS C MIRA 151 CUERNAVACA 240 RAMSAY RD PO BOX 9766 MORELOS MEXICO 62499, DEERFIELD, IL 60015-3438 ASPEN, CO 81612 KELLER KURT E SPENCER DAVID B ROBINSON STEPHANIE T BOX 840 107 ASPEN MOUNTAIN RD UNIT 9 'EN, CO 81612 1217 ROYAL ST #1 ASPEN, CO 81611 NEW ORLEANS, LA 70116 TERMINELLO DENNIS J & KERRY L 213 ASPEN SQUARE LLC GILBERT GARY 656 RIDGEWAY 533 E HOPKINS AVE 1556 ROYAL BLVD WHITE PLAINS, NY 10605-4323 ASPEN, CO 81611 GLENDALE, CA 91207 HEMP SUZANNE LIV TRUST FLY MARIE N NEWHOUSE IRREV RE TRUST 15470 POMONA RD 10170 WEST HUTTON DR 5640 CHRISTMAS LAKE RD BROOKFIELD, WI 53005 SUN CITY, AZ 85351 EXCELSIOR, MN 55331 S & S REALTY PARTNERS LLC GOLDEN PANTHERS LLC GRINSPOON STEVEN REV TRUST 230 PARK AVE 32ND FL 78365 HWY 111 #415 10 BALDWIN CR NEW YORK, NY 10169 LA QUINTA, CA 92253 WESTON, MA 02493 FREITAS MICAH J JONA HOLDINGS INC PARADISE TRADING PTY LTD TRUSTEE PO BOX 10915 TORONTO DOMINION CENTRE TD BANK TOV PO BOX 7795 GOLD COAST MAIL CENTER ASPEN, CO 81612 66 WELLINGTON ST W#4400 PO BOX 163 BUNDALL QLO 4217 AUSTRALIA TORONTO ONTARIO M5K 1H6, , WELLS RICHARD AARON WEST ULLA CHRISTINA GRINSPOON JEFFREY REV TRUST PO BOX 4867 3042 TOLKIEN LN 2724 N LINCOLN AVE ASPEN, CO 81612 LAKE OSWEGO, OR 97034 CHICAGO, IL 60614 ASPEN SQUARE 305 LLC NEUMAYER CHARLES & DEBORAH SODERLING RONALD E TRUSTEE 6018 BLOSSOM ST 900 BRIDLEGATE LN 901 DOVE ST STE 270 HOUSTON, TX 77007 NORTHFIELD, IL 60093 NEWPORT BEACH, CA 92660-3038 MAYFAIR INVESTMENTS LLC SABLE LTD W PROPERTIES 11 LLC PO BOX 268 PO BOX 11005 4600 MARRIOTT DR, STE 400 RICHMOND VICTORIA 3121 ASPEN, CO 81612 RALEIGH, NC 27612 AUSTRALIA , GUILBEAU CAPITAL HOLDINGS LLC N S N ASSOCIATES INC NORDAN JOSH 151 CHERAMIE LN 11051 W ADDISON ST 433 PLAZA REAL #275 GOLDEN MEADOW, LA 70357 FRANKLIN PARK, IL 60131 BOCA RATON, FL 33432-3999 -RADY LOTHAR & CHERYL TRUST ABRAMSON LAWRENCE M SPAR CONSOLIDATED MINING & DEVELOPM 6 MAUNALANI CIR 2315 ESPANA REAL 2009 MARKET ST HONOLULU, HI 96816 WEST PALM BEACH, FL 33415 DENVER, CO 80205-2022 GADA 777 REVOCABLE LIVING TRUST BENNETT MARGARET A REV TRUST RIEDEL JOYCE L TRUST BOX 2061 55 BAYBROOK LN PO BOX 3006 'EN, CO 81612 OAK BROOK, IL 60523 EDWARDS, CO 81632-3006 HIRSH RICHARD G & CLAIRE R RUDD WAYNE MOEN DONNE & ELIZABETH FAM TRUST NASATIR MICHAEL & DELIGHT 132 PARK AVE 8 CABALLEROS RD 2115 MAIN STREET BASALT, CO 81621 ROLLING HILLS, CA 90274 SANTA MONICA, CA 90405 PLATINUM GLOBAL VENTURES LLC GLUCK SANFORD & CAROLE E ASP TRST WILSON LINDA J & DAVID P PO BOX 2896 176 E 71ST ST PO BOX 1343 CHAPEL HILL, NC 27515 NEW YORK, NY 10021 EDWARDS, CO 81632 MARELL SARAJANE ABRAMSON MAUTNER RICHARD & MARIANNE RONYRA REALTY NV 2315 ESPANA REAL 2660 PEACHTREE RD NW APT 25A/B 4425 BAYARD ST # 200 WEST PALM BEACH, FL 33415 ATLANTA, GA 30305 SAN DIEGO, CA 92109 POWDER 210 LLC BELSKY PETER KOEPPEL KEVIN F 400 E MAIN ST #2 9204 EMMOTT RD 2627 S BAYSHORE DRIVE # 806 ASPEN, CO 81611 HOUSTON, TX 77040-3328 MIAMI, FL 33133 MJM HOLDINGS 11 LLC CRICK NATHALIE J WELLS RICHARD A & SUSAN T TRUST 1701 GOLF RD 835 E DURANT AVE #2 100 N TRYON ST 47TH FLR TOWER 3 STE 203 ASPEN, CO 81611 CHARLOTTE, NC 28202 ROLLING MEADOWS, IL 60008 PORTE BROOKE MELTZER-BRENNAN PARTNERSHIP MASON JOSEPH & JENNIFER 3520 PADDOCK RD 700 UTE AVE 231 DOGWOOD LN WESTON, FL 33331 ASPEN, CO 81611 BERWYN, PA 19312 RUICCI JOSEPH ANGELO RHODES MARJORIE S LLC MORGAN LORI 21298 LAUREN LN 1401 AVOCADO AVE STE #901 25 IRENE CT FARMINGTON HILLS, MI 48335 NEWPORT BEACH, CA 92660 BROOMFIELD, CO 800201142 KUTINSKY BRIAN NEUMANN MICHAEL JEFFRIES FRANK W 111 & JANET ODLE 26480 NORMANDY RD 7381 MOHASNIC DR 500 HUNTINGTON DR FRANKLIN, MI 480251034 BLOOMFIELD HILLS, MI 48301 ANN ARBOR, MI 48104 A-GUIN JEFF W & MADALYN B TRUST V M W TRUST OF 1991 KOVACH MARY SUSAN E COOPER #412 301 N LAKE AVE STE 900 1422 N LASALLE DR #101 ASPEN, CO 81611 PASADENA, CA 91101 CHICAGO, IL 606106416 S&S 115 LLC SKEGBY HOLDINGS LTD THOMSON FAMILY LP --0 UTE AVE #115 533 E HOPKINS AVE PO BOX 5100 'EN, CO 81611 ASPEN, CO 81611 NEWPORT BCH, CA 92662 ASPEN MOUNTAIN CHALET LLC RAHLEK LTD AT BANK OF AMERICA WELSCH SUSAN FLEET TRUST GPO BOX 338 3903 BELLAIRE BLVD 101 N SPRING ST #201 DARWIN NORTHERN TERRITORY HOUSTON, TX 77025 ASPEN, CO 81611 AUSTRALIA 0801, RUKAVINA MAE C TRUST ASPEN SQUARE HOLDINGS LLC CMMM INVESTMENTS LLC 5640 KIPLING AVE 1216 TIMBERLAND DR 4937 HEARST ST #B MINNETONKA, MN 55345 MARIETTA, GA 30067 METAIRIE, LA 70001 BJHW IRREVOCABLE TRUST ASPEN VALLEY LAND TRUST SILVERSTEIN SAMUEL C & JO ANN 425 1ST ST #3705 320 MAIN ST #204 110 RIVERSIDE DR 9B SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94105 CARBONDALE, CO 81623 NEW YORK, NY 10024 RING BARRY S CARMAN PETER PARLETTE R BRUCE 50% INT 552 W OAKDALE AVE 700 UTE AVE #808 PARLETTE RICHARD S 50% CHICAGO, IL 60657 ASPEN, CO 81611 825 DEAN ST ASPEN, CO 81611 BURGESS JOHN K & ELIZABETH CARAS STACY LIV TRUST WEIGAND BROTHERS LLC 700 UTE AVE #202 PO BOX 266 150 N MARKET ASPEN , CO 81611 PALOS VERDES PENINSULA, CA 90274 WICHITA, KS 67202 BARROW MICHAEL E TRST ASPEN INVESTMENTS LLC ESPOSITO VINCENT A & JANET M TRUSTEE: 708 E 12TH PO BOX 3657 6276 VIA CANADA NORTH LITTLE ROCK, AR 72119 ASPEN, CO 81612 RANCHO PALOS VERDES, CA 90275 HELLER STEVEN B VGA ALPS LLC LETTS W JACKSON & JOYCE H 3668 NW COTTON PL 6625 ZUMIREZ DR 2700 W 63RD ST BEND, OR 97701 MALIBU, CA 90265 MISSION HILLS, KS 66208 PARIMAR LTD OF C/-PLP CONSULTANTS GLORY HOLE CONDOMINIUM ASSOC DILLON ROBERT JAY 111 TRUST FLAT 201 VICTORIA HOUSE 730 E DURANT AVE 649 LOCUST ST 15 MANOU KATRAKI ST ASPEN, CO 81611 WINNETKA, IL 60093 KITI LARNACA 7550 CYPRUS, ' ".RWIN DUFFY & RON REV TRUST J&L ASPEN LLC THOMPSON LINDA TRUST TENAYA DR 19330 CARRIGER RD 7140 S RIVIERA ST TIBURON, CA 94920 SONOMA, CA 95476 AURORA, CO 80016 MENEFEE SAMUEL P CHANG CC& ILING S WRIGHT TRUST BOX 5291 44E ESTORIL COURT 1412 ANTIQUA WAY ' ARLOTTESVILLE, VA 22905 55 GARDEN ROAD NEWPORT BEACH, CA 92660-4914 HONG KONG, FOXS LEGACY LLC SB H FAMILY 2 LLC SUMMERS AARON MARK 400 E MAIN ST 316 PFISTER DR PO BOX 2946 ASPEN, CO 81611 ASPEN, CO 81611 ASPEN, CO 81612 WALLING REBECCA DK LLC K L 77 CO INVESTMENTS LP 350 BLANCA AVE 21 SAN MARCO CT 3903 BELLAIRE BLVD TAMPA, FL 33606 PALM COAST, FL 32137 HOUSTON, TX 77025 STUDIO FIVE LLC NAGEY DAVID A & ELAINE TRAICOFF NAGEY TIBOR F PO BOX 1863 3 BEACH DR 3 BEACH DR ASPEN, CO 81612 SHERWOOD FOREST, MD 21405 SHERWOOD FOREST, MD 21405-9999 LANDL FAMILY TRUST NELSON FAMILY LIVING TRUST ONE THIRTEEN LLC 6 W RIDGE AVE 295 BARRINGTON LN 3330 SW 58TH ST PROSPECT HEIGHTS, IL 60070 ALAMO, CA 945071749 FORT LAUDERDALE, FL 33312 BLUE SKY TRUST VIEREGG ROBERT TODD TRUST RODRIGUEZ/FERNANDEZ FAMILY TRUST 1024 E HOPKINS #17 2221 WYNDANCE WAY 4020 ENSENADA AVE ASPEN, CO 81611 NORTHBROOK, IL 60062 MIAMI, FL 33133 HEFFNER KRISTIN A SARICK SAMUEL & ESTHER ALPS PARTNERS 700 S UTE AVE #102 95 BARBER GREEN RD PO BOX 703806 ASPEN, CO 81611 DON MILLS ONTARIO CANADA M3CE9, DALLAS, TX 75370-3806 GAINES SUSAN R 700 S UTE AVE ASPEN, CO 81611 AFFIDAVIT OF PUBLIC NOTICE REQUIRED BY SECTION 26.304.060 (E), ASPEN LAND USE CODE ADDRESS OF PROPERTY: 709 05. t,wRAâ‚¬T Avg.. , Aspen, CO SCHEDULED PUBLIC HEARING DATE: Aw gu ST- 1 8 '20/62 STATE OF COLORADO ) ) SS. County of Pitkin ) 1. A/,CK. M45$,4*w (Iiatne. please print) being or representing an Applicant to the City of Aspen. Colorado. hereby personally ceilify that I have complied with the public notice requirements of Section 26.304.060 (E) of tile Aspen Land Use Code in the following manner: Publication ofnotice: Bythe publication in the legal notice section of an official paper or a paper of general circulation iii the City of Aspen at least fifteen (15) days prior to the public hearing. .Â·1 com' qi the publicalion is attached hereto. X Posting of notice: By posting of notice. which form was obtained from the Community Development Department. which was inade of suitable. waterproof materials. which was not less than twenty-two (22) inches wide and twenty-six (26) inches high. and which was composed of letters not less than one inch in height. Said notice was posted at least fifteen ( 15) days prior to the public hearing on thelis'day of -IbLY . 201 1 to and including the date and time of the public hearing. A photograph of the posted notice (sign) is anached hereto. Alailing of notice. By the mailing of a notice obtained from the Community Development Department. which contains the information described in Section 26.304.060(E)(2) of the Aspen Land Use Code. At least fifteen ( 15) days prior to the public hearing. notice was hand delivered or mailed by first class postage prepaid U.S. mail to all owners of property within three hundred (300) feet of the property subject to the development application. The names and addresses of property owners shall be those on the current tax records of Pitkin Count>' as they appeared no more than sixty (60) days prior to the date of the public hearing. .4 copy ofthe owners and governmental agencies so noticed is amiched hereto. Neighborhood () ift re,ach: Applicant attests that neighborhood outreach. summarized and attached. was conducted prior to the first public hearing as required in Section 26.304.035. Neighborhood Outreach..4 copy of the neighborhood owieach summary. including the method of public notification and a copy (11 any documentation Omt was presented m the public is anached hereto. (continued on next page) I. . Mineral Estate Owner Notice. By the certified mailing of notice. return receipt requested. to affected mineral estate owners by at least thirty (30) days prior to the date scheduled for the initial public hearing on the application of development. The names and addresses of mineral estate owners shall be those on the current tax records of Pitkin County. At a minimum. Subdivisions. SPAs or PUDs that create more than one lot. new Planned Unit Developments, and new Specially Planned Areas, are subject to this notice requirement. Rezoning or text amendment. Whenever the official zoning district map is in any way to be changed or amended incidental to or as part of a general revision of this Title. or whenever the text of this Title is to be amended. whether such revision be made by repeal of this Title and enactment of a new land use regulation. or otherwise. the requirement of an accurate survey map or other sufficient legal description of. and the notice to and listing of names and addresses of owners of real property in the area of the proposed change shall be waived. However. the proposed zoning map shall be available for public inspection in the planning agency during all business hours for fifteen ( 15) davs prior to the public hearing on such amendments. Af-1 _f~- Signature The foregointz -Aflidavit of Notice- was acknowledged before me this i t~tay of Â·ARglkt. . 201*. by N-i 616 FIA-SSM"Jrd WITNESS MY IIAND AND OFFICIAL SEAL ANNE LINDGREN 1 NOTARY PUBLIC My commission expires: 12 2 1 20 \4- STATE OF COLORADO NOTARY ID 20094025132 | DECEMBER 21.2017 -1 ATTACHMENTS AS APPLICABLE: â€¢ COPY OF THE PUBLICATION â€¢ PHOTOGRAPH OF THE POSTED NOTICE (SIGN) â€¢ LIST OF THE OWNERS AND GOVERNMENTAL AGENCIES NOTICED BY MAIL â€¢ APPLICANT CERTIFICATION OF MINERAL ESTAE OWNERS NOTICE AS REQUIRED BY C.R.S. Â§24-65.5-103.3 . Â¥. 4 2 9 4. I PUBLIC N Date OncE .-Aiigust 18,2015 BlaCRUNAGÂ«City Ha// Sister Cities Meeting Rm Purpose: For P&Z to consider an application submitted by Aspen Club Lodge L.. k * Properties LLC, 1101 30th St, NW, Suite 150, Washington DC 20007, for ' this property (the Sky HoteO. The applicant requests Final Commercial Design Review, and P/anned Development Detail Review to + redevelop the property with a mixed-use lodge building consisting of lodging, affordable housing, and commercia/ uses. This is the fina/ step in the land use review process. Council review and . k. 2 approval was received on February 9, 2014 by Ordinance 4yte.Â· 39, Series 2015. For further information contact Aspen f .9 ~ Planning Dept. at 670-429-2780 i 2.2..Â·-r432 - I - , -2 4 ..' e. ' -ruâ‚¬k-2 4,=. lili i Z. -1-'.,40.l - . '.. Irt. . - ..k,k U## f * ' ~. 4 72- - -11. fÂ¢i Â·Â·6,5, ..... PUBLIC NOTICE *r Date: August 18, 2015 Time: 4:30pm 40- t. I .. Place: 130 S Galena, City Hall it Sister Cities Meeting Rm Purpose: For P&Z to consider an application submitted by Aspen Club Lodge Properties LLC, 1101 30th St, NW, Suite 150, Washington DC 20007, for this property (the Sky Hotel). The applicant requests Final Commercial Design Review, and Planned i j Development Detail Review to redevelop the property with a , mixed-use lodge building consisting of lodging, affordable housing, and commercial uses. This is the final step in the land use review process. Council review and approval was received on February 9, 2014 by Ordinance 39, Series 2015. For further information contact Aspen Planning Dept. at 970-429-2780. 3 44'h t Â® &r If'. , r ..nk. - .t : El i =4. r 5 Â¥ IÂ¥ 1 - I , r V. E- Imp- r +~ Â¥ Â·'4-u ~. 5,~s.1 : ' 44, . - I Â£ il' 9' id* 41Â·f~ ~h ~ fit < . . 4,%Â¥02., i -t , I. I. V.I./1,- lk:.: 2 7. 1 4.h4 4 -....f idal I 'WIC)"4~75 -9/2,/IM*Lâ€¢*0E-'tie~ - L 311*t i~** '~â€¢41- ~~ 42 ~ ~ ~ *%524â‚¬~P,11 t n . .}12 j>1*V- ~A..~.~~ffL ~ *4 4 . â€¢11111â€¢Il~ ACT ... : r j . C ../ / 4 ' '-, , I , , . #0.2 I - >*3,' ~t* 20* * t.~'1 + 1 f. . f,1., A~ . I .. wpL f ~ 4~4;rt, -17; ~ c- l. 8, 0124 Uill 1 4 4- â„¢ *- . . 4 4. yr .9 I - -- t. 14 - v . .49.2 1 ., . I. t.. 4. . 4091 Al %1. M *61 4 4 E ../.r h - - . i' 7/Mt/t i 4 F E LAI lt, fri~ f..Â£ 6 2-ff, ' 2 1 * .4 '11 .FA.?Il F 3 , 1 Â¥ n. .#lilli&'- ' . I A. 1* ...W #. L hâ€¢,1.I' 42 . 124 .4 .1 0 2 4.1 43â‚¬1. ='' '*2 2,4,4 - 1 /1/ ' 1* ' -13 . O - i , I.. I ~ ' : i *4 ... .? ... k 612 11 1 4 2 00.. .. + lt- 7/// E- , 11't.~e .m"64 -% 4 . i: I -i-##*Wii/44. f 2**/n...../. 1 1 4 1% , - ..1. 128.-, 1 ~9,1.*la vo ~ 4/93./Pelly/"Ill.- . p ir.il ' I - *-** /a#* 40;*<*7-: 7,1. . I ' p. **, 3%3-rfr-~2 A Â¥*t' 34. 1.â„¢4 N O .ire-6 4, $ , ,Â£ , , ES f r.wi//1/1/1,#. 449 * ' 7 f .0,*Â¥ .Â¥ '" 4 - r /,2 %462< . f â€¢ Â· 44 il-' 9,5 ' Ill,7.PIWIN~ '~ i~ IDL=taid.KIN/II'IIIIIIIA 0..4. --'*' 1.- r 1,â€¢ -4.9 1 ft'fl.,94..1,14 , 11->, 4, I . ...47. f 0,Â» 21.2(E.3,~ r I ... %-F i NiJ#/13- â€¢AM**p~Â»G?2Â·92 ' 371'll'.I- I 'i - 1 I * ARKING ' '* 3 7 AM .. I. lum A I ' I. . PAY TO PARK ..... 0. .. I THIS BLOCK ~ - ~ 471J. A 4 -Â·2.4. * - Â» . 9, i,/,awl'# 1, A 1 HOUR MAXIMUM 10 AMÂ·6 ?t? W-.-*tq"'r.* I 4 p, v *MS, -N---4 l ~T-~27 , .i t.h . â‚¬ STA' 1" if 7- '4 .. PARKB~PHONE , I 1-866-234Â·PARK /1 . - ' $<i,-Â·- ~ -3 + ... .1 .+ ' I . 27, (7275)~ 4 I t '. -:ilt n ANGLE PARKING ONLY , PUBLIC NOTICE ' NO PRKING 7 4 V 16 -7 ANYTIME ~ 8 2015 , Date: August 1 , . *52 f k 1 0 Â£ Place: 130 S Galena, City Hall Sister Cities_Meeting Rm , 51:rÂ·m .' - 1 3 1 %. -, For P&Z to consider an application . 2.: 1. ~~.th purpose: , 4% D /1 7 submitted by Aspen Club Lodge Properties LLC, 1101 30th St, NW, /*:/ 4 -, Suite 150, Washington DC 20007, for i .h . this property (the Sky Hotel). The ; applicant requests Final Commercial i Design Review, and Planned ' Development Detail Review to redevelop the property with a -Â·, mixed-use lodge building consisting f 14 of lodging, affordable housing, and commercial uses. This is the final step tri the land use review process. Council review and approval was received on ~ February 9, 2014 by Ordinance ' 2 39, Series 2015. For further information contact Aspen 7 Planning Dept. at 970-429-2780. 4, 1 NA, . 4 *r . Â¥ .â‚¬ ill P.9 1, . F Â£ b .Al .9 -- 13, ~ 6 I i % . 1 31 *0. ~ . 2 V" j 4 I ;, PUBLIC NOTICE - Mineral Rights RE: 709 E DURANT AVENUE (PARCEL ID 2737-182-80-001) - PLANNED DEVELOPMENT DETAIL REVIEW AND COMMERCIAL DESIGN REVIEW NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that a public hearing will be held on Tuesday, August 18, 2015, at a meeting to begin at 4:30 p.m. before the City of Aspen Planning and Zoning Commission, Sister Cities Meeting Room, City Hall, 130 S. Galena St., Aspen, to consider an application submitted by Aspen Club Lodge Properties LLC, 1101 30 NW, Suite 150, Washington, DC 20007, for th Street, the property located at 709 E Durant Ave (commonly known as the Sky Hotel), represented by Vann Associates, LLC. The applicant is proposing to redevelop the property with a mixed-use lodge building consisting of lodging, affordable housing, and commercial space. The applicant received approval for a Planned Development - Project Review and other associated reviews by City Council on February 9, 2015 by Ordinance 39, Series of 2014. The applicant is requesting the final required reviews for the project, consisting of: Planned Development - Detail Review, and Final Commercial Design Review. The property is legally described as Woodstone Inn Condominiums, according to the Condominium Map thereof filed March 11, 1983 in Plat Book 14 at Page 45 through 49, inclusive at Reception No. 248609 and as further defined and described in the Condominium Declaration for Woodstone Inn Condominiums recorded March 11, 1983 in Book 441 at Page 814 at Reception No. 248608: together with a non-exclusive easement and right-of-way recorded in Book 327 at Page 777; and together with Encroachment License Agreements recorded in Book 316 at Page 232, in Book 425 at Page 907, in Book 425 at Page 913, in Book 425 at Page 919, and in Book 498 at Page 909, all located in section 18, township 10 South, and range 84 West of the Sixth Principal Meridian. For further information, contact Jessica Garrow at the City of Aspen Community Development Department, 130 S. Galena St., Aspen, CO, (970) 429.2780, Jessica.Garrow@cityofaspen.com. Name and Address of Mineral Estate Owners sent notice in accordance with Colorado Revised Statute 24-65.5-103(a)(1): Spar Consolidated Mining & Development Care of: Steenrod, Schwartz & MeMinimee, LLP Attention: Marcie R. MeMinimee 2009 Market Street Denver, CO 80205 RECEIVED Edwin J. Smart Care of: Steenrod. Schwartz & MeMinimee, LLP JUL 2 0 2015 Attention: Marcie R. MeMinimee 2009 Market Street CITY Or A.aPEN couu' 'NITv DE.CLOPMENT Denver, CO 80205 External Media Located Here - -=44 12fy ~ M-008497 ~ 1 3 RMMI Rev j*1 thoot~ **2_%13270/133- 1.. INTERPOLATED SITE TOPOGRAPHY SKY HOTEL n.--f---n-ir=--3 1(-L-34 1 LE-- 1 OF Â·8 7935 7936 7938 / 7939 194' 7937 __-19'A 19/1 = /93~193~~~ ~ ~ + in . *-0- -- 1 LA 4 IE *J Â«*1 /'/1 / z 1939 1/1 . \ 1/ 1 1 1 1/ 1 1 1 1 11 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 / 'IL El 1 1 9221 M IU Ul ~~~7-u L-L 1-3---11,~ f/1 ~--*-21 F-Â»r 7945-- -21PJ 7 /021Â»97 -Oft\<tliff------- --- dIOn - 1j /1 Câ€¢ 19 9-2 i.=f---3:1==.1--1 1 1 -I L i 332 ./1 11 / 4% 6-- 1 - rl / 1 1 11111111 11 1 4- o j - ~ 54 U Â£ i M .,/0- Ta==JI . --2=100>PE-J - -J=i _31 1 L GRAPHICSCALE 4 / \\7 1 4/ . 1/,I.~/ ( IN FEET) 34\ \ AA> / 9 -/ 1.1 1 linch= 20 ft- . r.11 - -3 L 5 4 %#- I. 1 L -1 - --x - -- 1- --E 41 2 1 1-- ,- 1 A OPRIS ENGI EERING - LLC CIVIL CONSULTANTS 502 MAIN STREET, SUITE A3 NOTKI ACCORDING TOCOLORADOLAW'fOU MUST COMI.lENCE ANYLEGAL CARBONDALE, COLORADO 81623 ACION BASED UPON ANY DEFECr IN THI 5URVEÂ¥ W,THIN THREE Â¥EARS AFTER YOU FIRST DISCOVER SUCH DEFEC IN NO EVE,irr MAY ANY A.nON (970) 704-0311 SOPRISENG@SOPRISENG.COM 8*SED UPON ANY DEFEC IN TH S SURVEÂ¥ BE COMMENCED MORE THAN TE. vEARS FROM THE DATE OF CE,m. Al,0,1 51,OwN HEREON. 12/9/20~4 PROIEC# G:\2014\140'40\CIVIL\En~ Out*LAD 14019 EXCOND -e,pallted e,0$:~,1 Â«rade' re,sed.0,4 7937 Â¤ PROPOSEDADA RAMP / SITE IMPROVEMENTS LEGEND Of 9 SPILL CURB& --- r w -- GUTTER TYPE' n\\ (00 --- -- - -- -- -- -- -- - EXISTING EASEMENT tot' 1 - i-D m- PROPOSED UMITS OF DISTURBANCE EXISTING PROPERTY LINE 5 A LOD APPROXIMATE LIMITS - ' - 5â„¢ - 5' SETBACK ao - ./.URBANCE Z k too -.I<%%/- BARRIERCUR' I PROPosED I - * p# k. t. F GUTTER IYPL A - PROf'OSEDSTORM SEWER AaARAMP 0 _~~ DURANT AVENUE .... PROPOSED ASPHALT PAVEMENT _PROPOSED 3. 007 .\ 'CA-- / 1 ~ - 4/E - (4)0 STREET EAS-7 1 7 /-1- \ 4 '3 +4 -7- - ~ PARK' r i PROPOSED CONCRETE PAVEMENT 4 I . 7.i y 20.5' PROPOSED / -- 1 - i , PROPOSED PERMEABLE PAVERS ADA RAMP - N .r4 - PROPOSED ROW PROPOSED LANDSCAPING 00 --0<.Ip , 5.0 ADARAMP , 'ARRIERCURB& 9/ - I ' GUTTERÂ· -PE A I 8.0 EXIS'ING AIIACHED SIDEWALK 15 FIll PUBLICPEDESTRIAN Â· ' - LAILMEN! PLH IHIS PLAI 9 18,~r WIDE PRIVATE. NON-EXCLUSIVE R - Â»1 --1- f INGRESS/EGRE~SEASEMENT 1 lii i--'--/ f PER PLAT -U , k hOR CHATEAU CHAUMON' AND CHATEAU DUMONT -----21 46 n PROPOSEOPUBLIC ACCESS EASEMENT :2-4.2 1 1 5 0 WIDE DRAINAGE i. Â· ~ -ANDUmrrl i,5..m ~ ~ , PROPERTY LINE I ~ 2/ d SERVICE ENTRANCE 4 + 11.~ WIDE DRAINAGE ' / Â·AND U. LI'Y EASEMENT / 21-4 9 / J=W j k PER PLAT CHATEAU DUMONT CORRIDOR *- 20 : TIEREDLAND5CAPEAREA 1 :2' 1 1 -FOR WATER QUALITY 7 . 1 la Â§11 TREATMEN'f LL.1 8 e: Ell DROP [Â» PARKING AND ~ ~ 2 E VALETSERVICEAREA / , 1 EXNINGWALL / I- 6 - 50'Wl[*DRAINAGE INSIALLBOOARDSBETWEEN , ANDUTIU'YEASEMEN' DROP OFF/PICKUP PARKING & 1 PER PLA 1 ARLA~ SIDÂ¢NALK {TYP ) 8 7 ' j CHATEAU CHAUMONT 4 f MECHANICAL AIR INTAKE 24.51 EDGE 8 WITH GRATE OFASPHALT.0 - EDGE OF .PHALT 1 ' j ~1 -7 12 25- 1/ - platupPARKING' " 1 1 12 254.4.1 * 200 VALETSERVICE AREA 1 91 .1. -* MAIN ENTRANCE 'ely V --:--- ALLEYROW 4" ROLL OVER ClAU; ALONG ENTIRE LENGTH g|F PARKING I - L:,61 - --N BLOCK 1 TRASH - .8 Â»\-2 i \-1 - & LOADING SKY HOTEL 07 ALLEY ONÂ£ WAY DOCK AREA 709 E. DURANT AVE 4(/ ROW' ' LOT: 42,336 SF I. - - 4 h &1 - . 40 LANDSCAPING WAL CONERUL. ~ GATE,/DOOR CONTROLLED (REFER .ARCH[TECTURAL' - _ r- IMITED ro I DRAIN PAN F GARAGE ACCESS LANDSCAPE PLANS FOR ROOFTO. L LANDSCAPING WALL WTTHIN SETBAOt PEDESTRIAN I IMPROVEMENTS) CROSSING " UMrTED TO 30" WIH IN SETBACK sIX(7) STEPS PROPOSED 1\ f 11"TREAD ADA RAMP ~\1 # SECONDFLOOR 6"RISE '........82 I 11 IERRACE GLORY HOLE CONDOMINIUMS {RE-ERIOARCH,TECTURAL' LAND5CAPE PLANS FOR SECOND ~ c.0 jl ~.OORTERRACE IMPROVEMENTS) CUT ' 1-t Lut --- 1 1 11 1 ' PROPOSED i ~~ ADARAMP ~*~ ~ 41 0 Slk / / TIERED LANDSCAPE AREATO 2\Â» UX 4 . Â· ~ %1 BE USED FOR WATER \ BARRIER CURBIGUTTER TYPE A ~ 1 QUALTI TREATMENI *h - 422519 D- S' SETBACK PERCIASTANDARDS 10 1. p 2 ' IN JOlA 00:6.-9 . - -k.b 'I - - - ----iFRE~-TA. PROPERTY LINE PROPOSED _/ 6.0' CENTERLINE. 1200'WIDE ~ - / LU ADA RAMP / Nze-2- 4 ----- , 7 EASEMENT AGREEME. POR CENIERLINE (* 13 83' WIDE EASEMENT %Â·~- .... CO7 4- 5 K-X s i . i D \ PRIVATE ROADWAY/INGRESWEGRESS AGREEMENI ~OR PRNAIE / N 1 gel -- 2 j L GRANTED BY ASPEN ROADWAY/INGRESS/EGRESSGRANTEDBY 3 - ' ALPSOV.NERSTOHANS 8 OViTRUP ASPEN ALPSOWNERSTO HAI,15 B -- --*-J (NOW 5KÂ¥ HOTEL CANTRUP (NOW SKY HOTEL) 007 -1 BK 31 / PG ; N BK.327 PG 777 -- 2 80 & UTE AVENUE PEDEWRIAN CORRIDOR 6 91' ~~ ~~ ~ i ASPEN ALPS BUILDING 100 GRAPHIC SCALE (IN FEET) ASPEN ALPS (100 BLD) - linch= 20 ft. R * PLAT BK. ZA PG. 304-308 ---U,1 $ / \ PE CO \ 31 Know whatÂ·s beloW. DATE 7-14-15 Ca|| before you dig. JOB NO 14040 CALL 2-BUSINESS DAYS N ADIANCE BEORE foo 0!G GRADE. I DCAVATE # K IARKING OF UNDER230 SHEET Cl MEMBER U11U11ES NOI1OnkllSNOO 31Â¥0 Sly'INI 'Dll '9NlkE]INIDN Al 03N91920 -NVilnSNOoll AG 03>Â¢03HO AG NAAVHO 133H1S NIVKV SOUTH SPRING ST. rHE UTTLE NELL HOTEL 4Â¢4' ' , i ~-- Â£8&903 '=Illv NV-ld SlNEINBA EHO-VOL-(0 MO-+01 31VO /0 NOISIA3H 1N3INd013A303hI 131OH A>IS NOI1Â¥OllddÂ¥ M3IA3hl 031IV130 1N31Nd013A30 03NNVId '41, + - - iic --~'~ ~ L ~ / EXISTING & PROPOSED LEGEND ~42 ./ . I. EXETING WA.lER MAIN Z lEt I EXISTING CONTOUR %6 ISTING ELEC TELE. CABLE ./ Â£05 .: 74/ D. i 7900 EXISTING CONTOUR INTERVAL m m EXISTING SANITARY SEWER MAIN 0.7 -'00 > lo, 0 1 . 44 EX~STINGELED. TELE. CABLE GAS I EXSING UNDERGROUND ELECTRIC $ TYPE B SPILL CURB r , ADA RAMP '. O 4 - .4'A EX1STI NG GAS 't M I \ 1 U. C *in EXISTING TELEPHONE - I I al Â£ t b . m - rri / EXISTING OVERHEAD ELECTRIC 00? g. 1 0, ADA ;AMP _ 1 n m n EXISTING CABLE 4 41 -7 . \ . .' EXISTING FIBER OPTIC An 4 - /4 *â€ž EXISTING IRRIGATION PIPE i g p 3 4 14, / 4 i AN ----------- EASEMEN T i Â· . TYPE A CATCH CU~ + h N . EXISTING STORM SEWER h Â£-5- 'r. - SETBACK(5) *74,2 PROPERTY LINE 0 1 - + * *,t ... O g ' ~ -- Â·Â· 1 EXISTING ELECTRIC MANHOLE TYPE A ~ATCH CURB. Z # 2 .. EXISTHNG TELEPHONE M,Alilli -MATCH EX 7938 J. 1 EXISTING DRAINAGE DRY-WELL . ,-1 9 1-AL ~ *4~LMATCH EX 7938.12 4 -- ' EXISTINIG SEWER MANHOLE SCREENWAU- - - 01 10 EXCEED 30/ 2 a EXISTING UTILITY MANHOLE -4.4 n , K - WITHIN SET BACK ~ E)CITING FIRE HYDRANT /15Â· Â· 44 i r LANDSCAPE AREA TOC:7937,36Â· Â· N.Â«2 â€ž *s~ EXiSTING WATER VALVE 44 TOC.7938~38' (8 RC 1) I CL .~ - T. 3 Li f li .~. , 1 TOC 7938.59 ;7 - 5 4 Ari *41 ~ ExiSTING CURB STOP 1007938.73' - 4 EXGIll' GAS METER Â£6 FFE.7938.0 F *4 EXISTING ELECTRIC TRI!,NSFORMER 43 Â«; 4 & EXISTING ELECTRICMETER EXISTING TELEPHONE PEDESTAL ,2 8 4 56 EXISTING CAn/ PEDESTAL < 2 1 4 EXISTING SEWER CLEANOUT 8. 1 L-i.. f Wilf.jÂ·- 1 1 EXISTING LIGHT POLE In ID LANDSCAPE ISLAND./ --/< 41 #114- TOC 7938.84' , - EXISTING SIGN Z Z /2 Rou CURB AND cu. 7 / Allf #LE- - TOC 7938 84Â· - Â·. ~D- ,6 EXISTING STORM INLET LU o Â§@r- APPRQXIMATE LIM'. 00'15 2 hJ-Mi 2 U REE TBD TOSE DETERMINED COA CITY OF ASPEN CHATEAU DUMONT Ur [)15TURBA~CE 7*,Urf; FLUSH RIBBON CURe . - -- 290' - PROPOSED CONTOUR an - b j .: .7 -7900 - PROPOSED CONTOUR INTERVAL a. U L TIERED LANDSCAPE AREA FOR O - -1 , - 4.6, wATE,QUALITY,REATME,a --- - - PROPOSED SloRM SEWER 0- (aRC-2) - 80 - cru - PROPOSED ELEC, TELE CABLE. FIBER -- -w - #u - PROPOSED GAS TOC 7940.52' ~OC 7941 20' 0 . 7--21494 -,1 -T~ -i- PROPOSED TELEPHONE a ~ PROPOSED UNDERGROUND ELECTRIC , / / -7r6k - - _. - PROPOSED-ABLE 06. *,-4 L 0â€¢02 -. -I -Â· - PROPOSED FIBER OPTIC i PROPOSED SIORM INLET TOC 7941 18' /1.-7,7 I LOD I PROPOSED LIMITS OF DISTURBANCE FEE 7942 00' I PROPOSED ASPHALT PAVEMENT . 1 SI. BENCHMARK .1 40 SEENOTETHISSHEET - ... 0 Â¥,3 f fI P a !/ j i f '44 .4 4, PROPOSED CONCRETE PAVEMENT TOC 7941571 .1 vt...4.*. 9/---4.4 aft,---*' BLQ,E~-~_ . Â· Â· Â· Â· Â· ' PROPOSED PERMEABLE PAVERS SKY HOTEL IOC:/942.00 Â·4J Â·~Nh - - 4 ---- AUR, 40 Ill , - 40 4.; _ PROPOSED LANDSCAPING \ LOT: 42,336 SF k.,Â£5 1 TOC 7941 IF 1 ./1,- ., 0 4/ %.# --yole ----- / 4/ 1+PÂ·7943 22' Â·Â·Â·~ ~ ~~~~---- + - 0, Mal 7 STEP; WITH 2 2 8 + -1!. Â£ TocÂ·7942 40 , -4-,-.hh - I. a 41" â„¢EAO 7944 .RISE . - '~'ADA RAMP , * T 7- TOE ~42 45 I. TOC 7942 96' RETAINING - _~_ _-ff-;I WAL'30' MAX - Q r FFE 794083' r- TOC 7940.77' . TIC:794083' ae TOCÂ·7942 -3' . TOC:7940~77 SECOND FLOOR FFE 794083 TERRACE 2. TOW 7944 53 / 7- 1 2/ e - 7942.43' TIERED.ANDSCAPE AREA FOR '~ WATER QUAL]m TREATMENT -6. *C 4) f O l TOW 30 ' 41 : CURB CUT 7945 44' 3 + MATCH EX 7942 rt TOC 7943 33' Toe 7944.89' 3 /# 7 4 - f 1 *90,9\ - rÂ· 40 - 97 -au. 7- i TIERED LAND5CAPE AREA 1. 51 o / 9 reÂ©Â»*3 g- in _~ ~ (BRC-7) . fi I T. 'P 1 , -2--- 9 Â»j ..~ciax,g,, A ' 9 uy 2/60 ' '02990.75' A r 1-F-- Z A~~ 17*-~--______I-- 9-t 5 3 1. , 0 ~,~(t ~= 1 0" ,0 EOAq46.20' '07 01- - f I. 01-- G. MA~[CH EX,7944~~ i EOA HP:7946.33' - F FLIP,/946.21~ uA MATCH ./.7946.2'1 .. GO-2 -- - GRAPHICSCALE ,- . 14 +4..,12==-W M m... 2~Mifill'M<.I..~. -- CO, X - O *'~ ~4-- .' -- --- *1 ' k-Z MATCH Ex???Â·1 ~- < IN FEET ) ag - -~42.,cz;-Â·--li- 1 inch= zo ft MATCH EX.??? i Eli cO : 3 10 MATCH EX.77?ri I '64T-- ar ASPEN ALPS BUILDING 100 ~ ~ MATCH EX???'i -' - - 1 SPOT ELEVATION LEGEND SITE BENCHMARK Uj 44 N - BASIS OF ELEVATION AN ELEVATION Of 7911.98' (NAVD 1988} Ok THE BOW = BOTTOM OF WALL NGS STATION "0 159% PER THE 2009 CITY OF ASPEN GPS CONTROL EOA = EDGE OF ASPHALT SURVEY le!5 EM ABLISHED THE LOCA' SITE 8ENCHMARK OF 7940.72 EX = EXISTING GRADE ON THE #5 HEBAR AND 1 25 " PLASTIC CAP, STAMPED L 5 #16129. FFE = FINISHED FLOOR EEVATION MONUMENTING AN ANLE POINT H'il THE EASTERLY BOUNDARY LINE, . SHOWN HEREON FG = FINISHED GRADE FL = FLOW LINE HP = HIGH POINT LP = LOW POINT nI-rl MATCH EX = MATCH EXISTING Colll RIM = Ral ELEVATION -00 TBC = TOP BACK OF CURB Toe = TOP OF CONCRETE Know wilat's below. 2.0- DRAINAGE DIRECTION'SLOPE Cal| before you dig. %%1XXX:X.X.XX' SPOT ELEVATION -ET CAU 2-5.INESS ./.3 1/ I.VANCE DATE 7-14-45 BEFORE YOU DIG. GRADE. OR EXCAVA. , -FTIC:7900.00' FOR THE MARKING OF U']ERGROUND EXAMPLE TOP OF CONCRETE @ 7900 01 -* .E. EP UllL!1ES JOB NO 14040 SHEET (2 NOI.LOAM-LSNOO AS 03>103HD 3lÂ¥. SIVLLINI 711 '9Nlkl33NI Al OINDIS 30 3AN3AV SOUTH RING ST. 1-33B1S 3 9 ONIOVEID li 0-HZ (0 CLEO-*01-(Ot6) ~XVB THE LnTLE NELL HOTEL Elva Al NOISIABI 1N30Id013A303H 131OH A>IS N0I1V0I1ddV M3IA3ki 031IV130 1N3INd013A30 03NNÂ¥ld - /5 - L________._______, CONCEPTUAL POST DEVELOPMENT ONSITE PEAK RUNOFF RATES: 0 0 -i*im-T -2100 ~ I ~ AREA ~ i986-~ Z Â© DURANT AVENUE i~<,I/hrj(/0,/1(ds) LUE_-1__-almlELL_lairel-(Efi-J 105263200330107) 27 n _2-0.86_1-120053/lÂ£l L__2_891637_0053_2=302 8RC-1: LOCATED WEIHIN LAND5CAPINO 3~09237200850019 30.966.320Â£850.033~ AREAFOR REQ WATER QUAL'Y 40.4937700340.062 405863200340.125 TREATMENT FOR BASIN #14 ' (USE OF SILVA CELLS WIll BE EXPLOREDIN PROPOSED IhLET AND STORM LIWOE BIO-RETENTION MEDIA} 4 r....4.,4.1 5~06737201020255 50746.3201020.479 PIPE (SIZE TO BE CONFIRMED PRIOR TO BUILDING PERMIT 21_-0.57-372_0119_2253 6_0,656.320,1190.491 PROPOSED INLET AND STORM 6 - 4446 M SUBMITTAL) 70.6.37200340.083 70.726.3700740.156 PIPE (SIZE TOBECONFIRMED ct> ~ f - - - - -- -=-==--=-===--=------ ~ 8~ 0.73 ~ 372 ~ 0197 0.535 ~ 8 | 0.79 1 6.32 ~ 0.197 | 0.984 ] PRIOR TO BUILDING PERMIT SUMMITTAL) SA_225377_0081_222 _9A_O.81_631-0.9870.444 067 372 ! 0 099_ __3 0.246 ~ 1 -9B 1 0.74 1 9 322 ~ 0 099 0.461 ~ - _ ~~~~~~ |1211~_~L_11_4111_-Â®11-1--2-22_d It -14Â«2 27-1 =-01 0 072 =11-921_1-132_00720.343 - L.17092=377_2240011 ~ Lj' 1 8.Gl- 1 ~ 13 ID.40 ~ 372 1 0.001 I 0.002 I 1 13 I 0.52 1 6.32 ~ 0.001 I 923_I Z m i 014-065317-9-0260.964=14214-631_9-91_4-0120 1 ~- -- ---' 1 15061-112-93(!8012.-J L__12__L_-EL_LIE-1_192L_L--2-2~ 1 Â»<r--- ----7 551)51LVACELLSL0CATE~ON j ;- Â§4 CHATEAU DUN/IONT CHATEAU CHAUMONT SUBJEC PROPERTY AND dsED CONCEPTUAL-WATER-QUALITY-TREATMENT-SUMMARY-TABLE CORWATERQUALmTREATMENT | . 4- FOR BASIN #2 1 k .1.-/.& %12-1 - 3 T 411 .:, 7.'- TYL ORG.IOCATEDWITHIN ~WQ CONTRIBUTING AREA % WQCV | REQ. WQCV PROPOSED - /2 |/A L LANDSCAPING AREA TO PROVIDE 1- . 1 ~im ~ REQ. WATERQUALITYTREAâ„¢ENT ID'_ELL-aMEELÂ©_EmiL_1_11-~__.-EEMMEELLOCI BASIN#6 .-1* . . -- d FOR BASIN #5 F-- 1 1 LANDSCAPINGALONGNORTHSIDEOF /1 + 2 .- D. 1 14 I ARC-1 4 i 1491 | 64% I 0125 16 LU Frick I 7 1 111 Z= BUILDING NRe= L-Â§EL___-5_4464_84'4-0185_62__~_18Â®SCAPiNGALONGEAST-EREOLMIL (0 M U) LE : 1 SI - -1 9 Z Z .... BRÂ£4_10-110-89%_0205-57_LANDKAPLEARtA-Â»CHOFEATIO_J LU 10 2 Z r.- U1 : I 284./.1 71-k U 11 L=El____11 _314=1-_85%-_1____R.12L--_-_50 --1-&&!12EMiNE~22-ELRE&&2MEÂ® 1- .22: OL Li ~I! f SFV-1 UNDERGROUND SAND FILTER BRib-lL___-12E-,-18%0160ZL_pANDSCAP1NBAREAWESTREALESPARKING 51% .3 . r--7. .. .. - . C -#341 - TREATMENT VAULT TO PROVIDE REQ WATERQUALITYTREATMENTFOR BRC-7 ~ 8 8588 ' 88% 0 200 143 LANDSCAPING AREA EAST OF BUILDING & 1 Ul w,fi-;U ~-j :0'1'Â· ~''~5!N#2 1 -1- ' 2-- ---11~ -BASIN#6 ESTIMATED DIMENSION - - ~~ B f. 5.-:I 1 -E - .6-I.,C.... --~ JO'/ *4 5'll) --112-2-------- ---7 rGQ EiNG-| AREA T-E-1--wacv --1--wai--r PROPOSED 1 :0 4% i , BASIN. u. \ BLOCK 107 ALLEY 1 }1 2 -4. , r. A \-1 -~11 1 "~ i MRE 3 LOCA1EDWITHIN ROOt[OP WQ-CoNTRIBUTING 1- Am-%- WQCV REQ. WQCVI PROPOSED Â» .0 -TqltÂ·TOr:PRO'Â¢tetille: w~MMr .1.- - r., - r.~ - ./7 - Er. - C. - I. DEPTH (In) 1 - Â·1 QUALITÂ¢ TREATMENT FOR BSAIN #7 1+D BASIN S.F. IMPERV 1 (cf) TREATMENT LOCATION 'tr. 1 0[LOW GRADF IA ALLEY ALONG [AST SIC)[OF I i [-22__~ t.:t ~ 3774 ~ 90% 021 66 ~ LANDSCAPINGARIA W[STOFALFSPARKING 6 9-7 -:~] 1 ' GLORY HOLE LELL_L__LELL-ELIL-_litaLL_Lul_llaNDSCAPIAGAREAWESTOUESPARRItig : 2% 1 CONDOMINIUMS 1 4,/%6.:.. .1 L r=rtr---7--- ZE] ~ I NOTE ' 1*?h: PA~~iM , 705 E, Dl,ii.'ATA,02 STORMWATER MiTIGATION DESiGN ILLUSTRATED HEREIN IS CONCEPTUAL S~ZING. LOCATION AND TYPES OF ALL WATER QUALITY TREATMENT AND DRAINAGE INFRASTRUCTURE TO BE ~ /,t:42, :Â·36!,0 CONF~MED.INALIZED P.OR TO BUILDING PERMIT APPLICATION BASIN - i i j BRE- 7Â· VATHIN LANDSCAPING AREA 10 PROVIDE REQ PROPOSED LEGEND BASMUS WATER QUALITY TREATMEN1 FOR BASIN 18 TIERED TO - --- PROPOSED CONTOUR ACCOMM ODATE GRADE -7.0 - PROPOSED CONTOUR INTERVAL DIFFFRENTIAI i PROPOSED FLOW ARROW / ----- POST DEVELOPMENT DE*NAGE BASIN 1-f L--=~ ------ I - - - - PROPOSED STORM SEWER PROPOSED VA~ICE / 4,1-, BASIN#15 , _ 4Â·i A DESIGN PO]NT - -r--==---- --- Cr PROPOSED ASPHALT PAVEMENT / BASIN #lq _ BASiN till f ': 1 ' ht=t--*1%r====n J F# L PROPOSED CURB CUT ~ dr ' '-~ ~ ~ \ , PROPOSED CONCRETE PAVEMENT Z 0 2 4 \-13 1 irl)- --1...4.-0-WELL / BASIN #3 TO.MAL' 4 1- w /4 L ---- U.- I 3 p , ~ ~ PROPOSED PERMEABLE'AVERS I X f . 11 % BRC-STOPROVIDEWATER I * - I QUALITY pR_BASIN 11 EXISTING VALLEÂ¥ PAN AND I % 0 1 .8 3: UNnERGROUND SAND FILTER TREATME~T TRENCH DRAIN TO REMAIN PROPOSED LANDSCAPING -4. 0. -_-- 6-----huLTTOPROVIbEREQ.WATERQUAOTY -------------- - --------- - : 1 / , TREATMENT FOR BASIN # | I .*POSED INLETAND STORM Â·Â· - + ----- -10'*12'45'{D) - __ --_ -_ __ __ --- __ -----._._ - - --------- EXISTING LEGEND /PE (SIZE TO BE CONFIRMED , 5FVÂ·2 UNDERGROUND UND F![TER TREATMENT VAULT TO - -- E / PRIOR TO BUILDING PERMIT / PROVID[REQ WATERQUALITrTRIATMENTFORBASINIA EXISTING CONTOUR 5/BMITTAL) 10'*12'*4.5 DI ASPEN ALPS BUILDING 100 | 800 EXISTING CONTOUR INTERVAL a- B.4Â· LOCATED WITHI f , 4 - -D~- pNE,11. p,,ff' 4 BRC 6 TO PROVIDE WATER I LANDSCAPING AREA TO LANDSCAPE 'EA ; ./ALITY FOR... . . PROVIDED REI WATER , 1 , QUALIP TREATMENT FOR .. BASIN #10 - I I , >D , 1 ' 1 9 6 1- 7 ./ 1 - 6 0 GRAPHICSCALE DATE 7-14-15 (IN FEET) JOB NO '4040 1 inch = 20 ft. - SHEETC) NOI10AHISNOO AB 03>Â¢03HJ 31VO S1VllINI Ill '9Nlkl33 *8 03NDIS 30 VbIACI 3 60Z THE LITTLE NELL HOTEL *SS "0 X55 5 XSS Il Al NOISI/\3}] 103[Ohld 1N3IAId013A3038 131OH A>IS M31A3M 031!Â¥130 1N3Wd013A30 03NNV1d EXISTING & PROPO- LEGEND EXISTING CONTOUR 7900 EXISTING CONTOUR INTERVAL EX!STING WATER MAIN ~ .. E 2 EXISTING SANITARY SEWER MAIN CONNECT STORM PIPE Te ~ â€¢,-0 ./ce EXISTING ELEC. TELE, CABLE GAS ~ Z~-~... 4 EX!SnNEE. 1 3 8,/1,1 U .fÂ« L .. EXISTING ELEC TELE CABLE ric,0 2..... f 47 1 R b # * - EXISTING MS f; i 4.-,42. Z ~P #fl UN k;~p ~~ - ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ EASEMEN-1 TYPE 8 SPILL CURB. VALET LANV --* '72 59 I .i EXISTING UNDERGROUND ELECTRIC i t EXISTING TELEPHONE SLOPE TO PAN FLOWUY REMOVE EXUSTING '00 5Â§32,59 r 24Â« CMP IN~ Out N â€¢ 332 52' 0 60'13:( INSTAIL NEW STORM DRAIN INJ#T '9-, ilt. 1,! EXISINGOVERHEADELECTRIC *F' PER COASTANDARDS INLET SIZE TBD . ANDSTRUCTURE. n EXISTINICABLE RIMÂ·793706' es -24" Rcp Pill (IZE IP BE CONFIRMED ~ _ .- INWAU 40 1, i *me - INV *34.34' 4 EXISTING IRRIGATION PIPE ~ MWORTOBUILDINGPERMI) EXISTING FIBER OPTIC h:sliiL 201* 1 - m. EXISTING STORM SEWER I. %-'lili,0 --- h PiLET PER COKDMI eis,NOE EASEML~7~ 0- h 2 n,p PROPERTY LINE . . W. . CURE BOX 6.7936 47 -5 _ -9-1 - SETBACK (5') PVC INV I. RJM FLEV = 7936.95 IN/7933 38' 14 EXISTING ELECTRIC MANHOLE * . 6'PVCDRAIN / 4?I )/AGE I , DRAINCHASE - 3933.;C PIPE FOR BRO 1 84 - - EXISTING DRAINAGE DRY-WELL + . EXISTING SEWER MANHOLE OVE-j.OW INLET 2' WIDE .. STORMA,(AN'/E ..RE.WINLE ' EnSTING SEWER CLEANOUT R*WI-' - -_ /93640 15 C.Fill 'N W - 7933.94 24' CA'1N~~010/ iNV 14 r - 1~ EXISTING TELEPHONE MANHOLE *W.# ' 4 , .1.1 EXISTING UTILITY MANHOLE OUT I.':. '93â€¢* 15' R. PIPE(SIZE TO BE CONFIRME[F / EXISTING FIRE HYD~AM K~PA ALCUSEE PRIOR TGBU~DINGPERM:T 44 ,~4,4 EX[STING WATER VALVE 36i SILVA CEUS ~ ~ ~ ; EXITING CURB STOP *14 1 4 PUBLIC PEDESTRIAN _ Â· ./ 1-- EASEMENT PER IHIS PLAI 211 EXISTING GAS METER ' ~.. LANDSCAPE AREA FOR ' [r EXISTING ELECTRIC TRANSFORMER ' - WATER QUALITY " U . . TREAIMENT{BRC-1)'" .i 1" EXiSTING rELEPHONE PEDESTAL 1 i : ~OVERFLOW .LEÂ¥ '11! EXISTING CATV PEDESTAL BRC 2 P . PROPOSED PUBLIC f 2 6 F, ACCE 55 EASEMENT XE. EXISTING LIGHT POLE *i I 9 EXISTING SIGN 1 5.0 WIDE DULNAGE . S . 4 ZE. 1 ' IWIUTY [8'WAIT 4. mG~ EXISTINGSTORM INLET PERPLAT 4 4. I TBD TOBE DETERMINED 2 2. ~ 32 1 ~-2 - ~ REMOVE EXISTING DRm. L . COA CITY OF ASPEN 6 m z 3 8%* 11 1 WIll DRAINAGE -a71 - PROPOSED CONTOUR Z *Wii 7- 1 , AN. U..Â¥......1 -7900 - PROPOSED CONTOUR INTERVAL 2 PER PLAT V . 0 . :: 1.t LF "PVC DRAIN PIPE - PROPOSED STORM SEWER NOEX .... 2 Z h. - CHATEAU DUMONT FLUSH Rr98ON CURB ~ (SIZE TO BE CONFIRMED PRIOR - PROPOSED ELEC. TELE CABLE . / 11 TO BUILDING PERMIT - - % - au - PROPOSED GAS U / - r .:t 1,1 _~ orn â‚¬ TIERED LANDSCAPE AREA FOR - : -- m -,Â£ - PROPOSED TELEPHONE .' / WATERQUAL,TYTREATMENT # I CHATEAU CHAUMOI 2 .ORM MANHOLE I- Cu 2 ~ ~-Â· ~~ ~ PROPOSED UNDERGROUND ELECTRIC E. lONI 1. 1 PROPOSED CABLE . 1. , (.C-21 'r,... M ./. 5 0Â·WIDE DRAINAGE 8. CAP INV IN .-7932 30 . , 1 7 ' : + AND UTIUTY LASEME. -. -JC -. - PROPOSED FIBER OPTIC EMP IN~ IN 79~5.60 /. .,1 ~ J. , PER PLAT IM PROPOS E D ST O RM 1 NL E T Â¥ *NY34â€ž 51'' 1 t,l / UNDERGROUND WATER '9114 el cu*er QUALITY TREATMENT VAULI f ... (9.-11 - Loc - PROPOSED LIMITS OF DISTURBANCE DRAIN T'INTERCEPTOFFSITE PROPOSED ASPHALT PAVEMENT 440 *. 04%7. ALLEY RUNOFF 20* L.F TRAFFIC RATED TRENCH 24* LF. TRAFFIC RATED TRENCH 75* LF 6Â· PVC DRAiN PIPE , DIWN TO INTERCEPTONSITE Â· PROPOSED CONCRETE PAVEMENT $/Mp : *BLE PRJOR TO 8.BING PERMITI / / T ENT (SIZE TO BE CONFIRMED h ' RUNOFF FOR WATER QUALITY '936 2, 1.. I .. ' ~ Im ~ '~Q'~, '~:~ . -4 .-Â·" PROPOSEDPERMEABLEPAVERS SITE BENCHMARK *4 :di, i I. 1 944: 8~ ~07-lfF~. ~ r ----- - SEE NOTE THIS SHEET - .b .1.- 44 - le,-PROPOSED LANDSCAPING ion 709 E. DURANT AVE 42 336 SF ' 40 4 - 2 2 9 -1 -I CONDOMINIUMS 244/64~95&UEVP - / J CONNECT TO PROPOSED UNDERGROUND SAND - I.'ALL NEW TRENCI DRAI NIBE FORE ACCESS DOOR 14. L F /01 DRAIN - >93, 'g FILTER FREATMENT VALMT OR ALTERNATE WATER ----- k s . -I- 1.-- 0 /63; I QUALITY TREATM[IT 'AOLITÂ¥ LANDSCAPE AREA FOR WATER CONNIgPROPO5LD T .-!% â‚¬-- 7----*-411 R.*TORI PIPE TO / QUALITY TREATMENT EXISTING MANHOLE' n (BRC-6) W/OVERFLOW INLET RIM:7942.5/ 1 T UNDERGROUNDWAIER 1N\67935.89' 1 9 1 I QUAUTY TREATMENT VAULT BRC 7 / <:r , OVERFLOW ' - {SFVÂ·2) UNDERGROUNDWATER INLET / \ ------li QUAUTY TRE ATMENT VAULT : <.41 / 4 ..RHOWIN LINE ANDiNLEnFOR â€¢-1-% LANDSCAP[ ARLA ~OR WAN R I 2 8,-4 (SFV-3) GLORY HOLE Z 4 C i 1 /2 ' / 13* L Â£ 6" P.IRAN QUAEY TREATMEN1 LAND5CAPING ARLA (BRC 9 ./ OVERFLOW INLE1 f r , 7,1 DRAINAGE CURB CUT ' / TIERED LANDSCAPE AREA 'OR \ 301/Lf 24"RCP STORMPIPE i 1 5 , d f- 2-1 3 X~ 240* L F 8" PIC DRAIN PIPE h E-2~f - lf--,t < WAILR QUALITY IRLAi MLI, 1 %/9//OBLCON'IRMLD PRIOR< {SIZE 1/BECONFIRMED // I 1 / TOBUILDING PEKMIT) -- 4~ v - Â·~~ - PRIORTOBUILDINGPERMIT) (BRCÂ·7} /1 .(0 "80- , 1<.3 atÂ»- I - NNSTALL NEW STORM 4 64 , 2 + t.10 CONNE. ASPHALIr". '07 /-% ; Wr-71 ---- -~ *"N INLET PERCOA STANDARDS 'Â·4 00 PAN YONE. TYPEACURB -- 007-* " - \RIM:7942.87 r ./ 4 ~k., ' 60' & GUTTER PER COA STANDARDS p.: /936.45 VÂ« i J - - . PROT[. EXISTING -Zht.7-- - . %- LAN[)5CAPE 'hKA FOR WATER (g@.*0&/Al#*#IT ~/- 4 3 xh.~ ~~ / 1140ftl~UQ'Â¥140&**ipE - DRYWELL LU QUALITNREATMENT 4 PRIORTOeUILDING tri) -1-\ - 5 -NX iM/-41 i 44 *N- 00 ./Al .. - A . 1 PROTECT EXISTING TRENCH DRAIN --.- O -1 4 4 44 & loNi DRAIN PAN w Â»LU LU O GRAPHICSCALE lau. Know what's below. (IN FEET) Ca|| before you dig, DATE 7-14-15 1 inch = 20 ft. CAU 2-BUSINESS DAYS ~N â€¢DvANCE BEFORE rOU DIG. GRADE. OR ExCAVATE OB NO 14040 REDUCED FOR SWIMÂ·UAL- FOR THE WARK1NG OF UNDERGIROUND SHEET C4 NOIIOnkllSNOO 18 03>103H0 31VO SlÂ¥IliNI 'Ill '9Nlkl33 DN 3 SIbldÂ° S AI OBNDISID ~ /9 Nlima 133BL SOUTH SPRING 5T. ~lva Al NOISIA3h NOI1Â¥OllddV M3IA325 03llÂ¥130 1N3INd013A30 03NNV18 1N3IAId013A3CI3hI 131OH A>IS I. 0 1 CONTUCTOR TO COORDINATE ABANDONMENT RELOCATION AND BURIAL OF THE EXISTING UTILITIES ~ / GENERAL UTILITY NOTESÂ· + 41* -% .~H THE UTILITY PROVIDERS CONTRACTOR Te PROVIDE ALL TRENCHING. BEDDING. AND EACKFILL '4: *' - WORK NECESSARY :JOR LITILITY RELOCATION THE UTILITY PROVIDE RISTO PERF ORM ALL LINEWORK i.9 NECESSARY :e- DiP 4 M - -/AEXISTIN~'WATER 2 THE CONTRACTOR SHALL CONTAIN HIS CONSTRUCTION OPERATIONS WITHIN THE LIMITS OF 3 THE LOCKTIONS OF UNDERGROUND UT Ill T]ES HAVE BEEN PLOTTED BASED ON UTILITY MAPS LOCATES 00 ./ 4/ â€¢Si .. 2 'I' DEPARTMENTSTA,Â«DANI~ O 0 CONSTRUCTION CONTRACTOR SHALL NOT OPERATE OUTSIDE THIS AREA WITHOUT THE PRIOR - # . 41 $ SERVICE..E n - CONSENT OF THE PROPERTY OWNER(S) INVOLVED - MAIN PER COA WATER k .. 6 + - *0 4, m -- / RESPONSIBILITY OF THE CONTRACTOR TO CONTACT ALL UTILITY COMPANIES FOR FIELD LOCATION OF m OR OTHER INFORMATION PROVIDED BY UTILITY COMPANIES AND ACTUAL FIELD LOCATIONS IN SOME ~ - I. ./ Â£.44 *r~ INSTANCES THESE UTILITIES AS SHOWN MAY NOT REPRESENTACTUAL FIELDCONDITIONS IT IS THE 0 2 U TILITIES PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION 0 J 4 6. Cm/AP hÂ« / 5 CONTRACTOR TO COORDINATE ALL /ILITY LINEWORK WITH THE RESPECTNE UTILiTY COMPANY 4. *0 - - - .PROPOSED . yl, ~ Iâ‚¬ DIP DURANTAVENUE + ]* b. - EASEMENTY 4 ALL UTILITIES BOTH UNDERGROUND AND OVERHEAD SHALL BE MA NTAINED IN CONTINUOUS SERVICE Fur. . -4. '* . .- - 4 , VITRIF,ED aAÂ¥ PIPE SEWER . - LIABLE FOR ANY DAMAGES To OR INTERRUPTION OF SERVICES CAUSEDBY THE CONSTRUCTION RBANDON EXISTIN~# g THROUGHOU T THE ENTIRE CONStRUCT !014 PERIOD THE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE AND SERVICE AT THE MAIN Ir I . PER ACS' REGULATIONS ...1 Â·Dme 1.1 8 e f 'ppOOXIMATE LOCATION OF 4.f PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION p.ofbbil Ill DEPART.L.1 '47 I. 6 ALL SITE AND UTIUTY WORK SHALL BE IN COMPLIANCE WITH OTY OF ASPEN RULES & REGULATIONS i f 6 1 _ _' 2-< I. I *CONNEaloN ./ AND UTILITY PROVIDERS SPECIFICA TIONS PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS NOTE: '34 ..L 7, Â· J#/. 1 \ "#M - 1 PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS SHALL BE IN COMPLIANCE W'TH THE CITY OF ASPEN ENGINEERING STANDARDS r . -- -# I i . # 52 AND CITY OF ASPEN ROW STANDARDS PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS]Ni THE ROW MUST MEET THE CITY'S 2 -6/ * 4 CONSTRUCTION AND EXCAVATION STANDARDS T ...LC PECE'll'N / MEETING IS REQUJRED P~OR TO COMMENCEMENT OF WORK . ..4 4~RA -, -L---- .14#*VS+~ $*fi#%.1 4 I. 6: 180 WiDE PRIVATE. NON-EXCLUSIVE i 2 â€¢# M EASEMENTPERT/1. PIT 4 3 2 CONTRACTOR TO INSTALL WATER SERVICE PER CITY OF ASPEN STANDARDS A PRE-CONSTRUCTION IN(DRESS/EGRESS EASEMENT 4 4 449 FOR CHATEAU CHAIMONT X , 1 - ~ _ ~ ~C ~ ~ ~ ~~ ~~ ~ SHALLOW UTILITY NOTES: AND CHATEAU DUMONT -L PER PLAT 2 I. 1 ALL MINIMUM DEPTHS, SEPARATION DISTANCES, MATERIALS AND/OR USE OF CONDUIT SHALL BE I. J|~ ~ ~ PROPOSED PUBLIC 1 1 MOVE EXISTING CA8LE SERVICE FEED TO - % I . CONFIRMED AND COORDINATED WITH THE UTITY PROVIDER PER J-iLITY AGREEMENTS 0 0 APPROXIMATE LOCATION OF P 2 v $ 4 ACCESS EASEMENT 7 / L Lill LE NE. INTO PROPOSED UnUTY - 4 - PROPOSEDPVC~EWER SERVICE ./ PLE ACSDS[AND*05 n , 13 e i I / al,7 I RENCH/EASEMENT - - 4. * 1 ALL UTILITY LINES AND/OR CONDUITS TO BE BACKFILLED WITH SUITABLE MATERIAL FREE OF ROCKS >1 8' PVC BASED ON ESTIMATED '- jo 1/7 0 USE CLASS 6 AGGREGATE BASIE MATERIAL FOR BEDDING, AND.'OR SUITABLE ONSITE MATERIAL 1 11 11-J SO'VA..MIAGE : . I IS. I NSTALL PER UTILITY PROVIDER SPECIFICATIONS BACKFILL TRENCHES WITH SUITABLE ONSITE CONa PTUAL DESIGN PLH PLAT * 6 9 APPROXIMATE LOCATION OF 2# T /1 . AND UTILITY EA&'MENT 4 Â¥3. R .5 2 + MATERIALS MINIMUM~ COMPACTION 95% IN PAVED AREAS PROPOSED DOOMESTIC WATER & ~ : P - 4. FIRE 5UPPRE55ANT SEAvll 2 2 - 4 4 !415]ALLNEW 12~*8-TLE&8- n 4 4.4 14,# 3 GAS AND ELECTRIC TO BE INSTALLED IN SEPARATE TRENCHES SEWER SERVCES TO BE INSTALLED A + 44 e GATE VALVE PER CITY OF j COMBINED TRENCHES PER CONSTRUCTION FEASIBILITY AS LONG AS MINIMUM SEPARATION DISTANCES 2 4 42 I t<)' i .- 1 111Â·WIDEDRAINAGE ~ - - ./4 44 : MINIMUMIM 10Â· FROM WATER SERVICES AS FEASIBILE COMMUNCATIONS MAY BE INSTAUED IN 7-Iziu~ - AND Un LITY [ASEMEN, 4 ** AND DEPTHS OF BURY ARE MAINTAINED INSTALL WARNING TAPE OVERALL U-T,131-Y LiNES EZ ASPEN WATER DEPARTMENT 2 /22* . ELECTR}C. TELEPHONE. CABLE ' Â· 0 Â£~~Mt PER PLAT -t# 2 %TANDARD5 ANDFIBER OPTIC SERVICES ROUIL .L I UTILITY SERVICE MINIMUM DEPTH :E . 18.2 0 CHATEAU DUMONT INTERNALLY TO MECHANICAL ROOM - ' 1 -w L NEW 3 PHA5E HOLY CROSS ELECrRIC - - - 4 *. 2 WATER 70' Z -J ': TRANSFORMER AND ELECTRICVAULT 50, . REMOVE EXISTINGGAS METER / P â„¢ 1.1 4/ Â«L PEDESTALS. EXTENDTELEPHONE. FIBER - INSTALL N[W TELEPHONE AND CAB. -K SEWER W 0 LA .Lu ANDABANDON E.!STING ' M. - 4 2 3 2 . ELECTRIC CABLE TV 30~ 1.5 5 j # - .RVICE IN PLACE AS REQUIRE' 47, 1 OPTIC&CABLE SERVICESTONEW \\\ , .3/1 - PHOnt W CHATEAU CHAUMONT HOTEL AND TOCHATEAU DUMONI CAC 3/ U .09> Sa Sbe J - 1 ~â€¢a-- 0-/c.'efiun 5 0 WDE DRAINAGE UTILITY PLAN LEGEND 1 -4 2 =1 g g e T--0 4 7 AW<ND== I ,., ., .,, PROPOSEDWATERSERVICE O- Ul - .. -- ~ - PROPOSED SANITARY SEWER SERVICE 01 \ 1 .. PROPOSED GAS l,~) r f. ' r 1 0, E' :4 ABANDON EXISTING TELEPHONE AND CAal[ 5[RVIC[5 IN PLACE OR REMOVE - Fll - 0 ~ PROPOSED TELE, CABLE ELEC & FISER TRENCH -r n AS NECESSARY PER UTILITY PROVIDER'S - n - , - PROPOSED TELEPHONE ' 0 //-1 .- L -9 STANDARDS W -- .16 - U. - U. - PROPOSED UNDERGROUND ELiECTRIC A.ANDON EXISTING 1 ./ Â£ - , 1. 414 - /4 --'x - UTV - ~ - PROPOSED CABLE -ic -I- PROPOSED FIBER OPTKJ CAST IRON SEWER SERVI. . D ATTHE MAIN PERACS. 7 MOVE EXISTING CABLE SERVICE FEED _ _ _ _ _ FROPOSED $701â„¢ SEWER REGUNTINS / 2 TO LITTLE NELL [NTOPROPO5ED VIV CONDOMINIUMS $2 1 ., UITY TRENCH/EASEMENT * 0 2 % PROPOSED WATER VALVE - I. ELECTRIC ME'1Â¥R~'ER_HOLY --m--Â·~--7 :/ 2 1 4 i><0 PROPOSED GAS METER/VALVE ClÂ©SS./Im(*~5 5/ANDARD' i /,; I - j 1 -6 e GV PROPOSED ELECTRiC TRANSFORMER 7 R e t SKY HOTEL 8 ploposED SEWER CLEANOUT f 22 / i \ HM 40 . k I t.. X--~ 0 * , PROPOSED STORM INLET 709 E. DURANT AVE 2 e 0 2 - 0 . i we 2 33 2 I 'rc. - 9 . \ I I REMOVE TELEPHONE -NQ - -- - --- X. 1. EXISTING SANITARY SEWER MAIN . .* EXISTING WATER MAIN f /2 AND CAaLE SERVICE 5 : .7 5 4 WNK- N--N o- "r v~ rer - _ ~--~ A i. n. EXISING STORM SEWER REMOVE EXI. NG ELECTRIC *r-rr in. EXISTINGELEC TELE CABLE GAS 0 j TRANS,ORMER & METER PER HOLY -+C# A- EXISTINGELEC TELE CABLE CROSSENERGYSSTANDARDS \ 82&44- , r /7 2 0 / f EXISTING GAS 4 V: I EXISTING TELEPHONE 1 ) REMOVE EX,5TING CABLE PEDESTAL \ Aau "L ~ .J EXISTING UNDERGROUND ELECTRE F PERCOMCASTSTANDARD5 -1/ - ..\4 -1.. ...._F~Â»gu' 9 .., 4. k f: 11 - a n EXISTING CABLE ~ StiONDLEVILTERRACE , -U s <h. - b:<UÂ»3 w Â£'iÂ· EXISTINGFIBEROPTIC 1 ~A ~ 2 or EXISTING OVER-IEAD ELECTRIC in - EXISTINGIRRIGATION PIPE GLORY HOLE ---- - EASEMENT / X. . 441 \1 -13- , 5 PROPERTY L NE 113 - 5 - ST- - 5' SETBACK w Tfi : 2, 1. 11 1 8 - 1 4, f / / f EXISTING ELECTRIC MANHOLE 0.- 4 8 EXISTING DRAINAGE DRY WELL 1 -#- - 1 1 * *i~~~NG~0\XI CRO: EXISTING SEWER MIANHOLE \\\/ 442 1 % - I / 4 b. 9 ELE-EVAUU EXISTING FIRE HYDRANT Z L EXTLNDNE.3-PHA. Of /X W NEW TRANSFORMER k ~ ELECTRIC.RVICITO EXISTING WATER VALVE I. EXITWIGGASWETER i LOCATION EXISTINGELECTRICTRANSFORMER 7 . i) , - * L 91 . y. .-/ ---- ~ ~ C EXISTING ELECTRIC METER 1641 .-. %- .-. --j. If R % *% EXISTING TELEPHONE PEDESTAL EXISTING GAS SERVICE TO BE ABANDONED . 46 EXI. ING CATV PEDESTAL PUBLIC PEDESTRIAN - L I EXiSTING SEWER Ct EANOUT - EASLMENI PERIHISPLAI .3. : Lj.< - . & X t. 1 0 --- 1 -1 1 , f EXISTING LIGHT POLE EXISTING SIGN RELOCATE EXIST:NG ARE HYDRANT TO . Z \ L LANDS~PE AR.PERCOAWATER %- 441 \ - /Â£ m EXISTING STORM INLET ---- 1- I .4 DEPARTMENT.ANDARDS r WE Â· 10 INSTAI NEW GAS SERVICE TO BUIL-DrNG . L pER SAVRCE GAS REGULATIONS INSTALL 4 NEW G*& METER AT FACE OF BUILING 4 -- Im- . F ASPEN ALPS BUILDING 100 z D - 4%- f < 2 1 / 443 D 9/ 8 g 0 GRAPHICSCALE iNCJ<--T Know what's below. (IN FEET) Ca|| before you dig. DATE 7-14-15 CALL 2-BUSINESS DAYS IN ADVANCE 1 inch = 20 ft. MEMBER UTUnES JOB NO 14040 8EF0RE YOU DIG. GRADE OR .CAvATE FOR .E MARKING . UNDERGROUND SHEET C5 NOLOnkliSNOO Â£g9L8 31VO S,Vllill Al OINDIS3 n 3602. *8 03)103HO rHE LITTLE NELL HOTEL Â£&Â£01,0,(-COLS) XVJ Il /8 NOISIABI 1NBINd013A3038 1310H AMS M3IA3kI 031IV130 1N3Wd013A30 03NNV1d rÂ»j LANDSCAPE GUARANTEE: THIS GUARANTEE IS TO COVER THE COST TO STABILIZE THE ENTIRE SITE WrTH DURANT VEGETATION <FOR EXAMPLE, SHOULD THE PROJECT FALL THROUGH, THE CITY HAS THE RESOURCES TO rie STABILIZE THE SITE AND THE CITY IS NOT LEFT WITH AN UNSTABLE, DIRT LOT). STREET rowland+broughton architecture /uman design / inte#or design 234e hopkins ave 1830 blake st, ste 200 LEGEND aspen, co 81611 denver, co 80202 970544.9008 0 303.308.1373 0 970.544.3473f 303 308.1375 f FACE OF CURB SYMBOL MATERIAL/PRODUCT AREA UNIT COST TOTAL COST ~~ ON-SITE, GRASS SEED 34,202 SF $1.50/SF $50,077 PROPERTY LINE AND TEMPORARY --- IRRIGATION ON-SITE, 6" TOPSOIL 34,202 SF $35/TON $6,470.10 Consultants ---- = F ~ ~ ON-SITE, ASPHALT 2,845 SF $8/SF $22,760 PARKING bluegreen ALLEY CONNECTOR ON-SITE, ASPHALT 1,800 SF $8/SF $14,400 ~ 3~ s sÂ®ng s~ suite 202 970.429.7499 0 CHATEAU aspen, co 81611 970.429 9499 f DUMONT www.bluegreenaspen.com 1 NOTES 1. ASSUMES EXISTING BUILDING HAS BEEN REMOVED IN-FULL AND ROUGH GRADING IS IN APPROPRIATE ~ CONDIÂ·nON TO RECEIVE TOPSOIL. 2. OFF-SITE STABILIZATION IS NOT INCLUDED IN THIS GUARANTEE. PLEASE REFER TO PUBLIC FACILITIES AND Issue. PUBLIC INFRASTRUCTURE GUARANTEE AND STORM WATER + DRAINAGE GUARANTEE FOR ADDITIONAL 07.14.15 INFORMATION. DETAILED REVIEW APPUCATION 1 -----1 TIJ [1 1 1 I- - 3 -4 1-1 -1 1 1 1 ~13 _ i i 11--=- 7 -2 ALLEY PROPERTY LINE ==/ _-1 1 GLORY HOLE CONDOMINIUMS 1 SKY HOTEL 1 = 709 E. DURANT AVENUE I ASPEN, CO 81611 1 4--- 1 1 FACE OF CURB PROPERTY LINE <"<f #mA. 7.. -+ :- --- 1 ---- --1 - ----- 523 -- M NORTH PROJECT NO: -- 21406 DWG FILEÂ· BG L SERIES SKY HOTEL.dwg ASPEN ALPS CONDOMINIUMS ' SHEET TITLE 1 LANDSCAPE GUARANTEE PLAN SCALE: 0 8 16 7- 1 ne -I-) %,i~- rE. c~.T#I Â¤11 ne ~xua~N, I PRELIMINARY RIT,4,u col-[- Lâ€žv./Tv-â€ž *Inâ‚¬N a-ET~ NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION 1Â£U 1,01Â«1 CG~Y~-,6 -140â‚¬TO SITEWORK GENERAL NOTES LAYOUT & MATERIALS NOTES PLANTING NOTES r. 1. THE GENERAL CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR COORDINATING ALL WORK BY THE 1. LAYOUT AND VERIFY DIMENSIONS PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION. NOTIFY LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT OF ANY 1. PLANT MATERIAL IS TO BE HEALTHY SPECIMENS FREE FROM DISEASE OR DAMAGE, AND IS TO BE SUBCONTRACTORS. DISCREPANCIES. LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT TO REVIEW AND APPROVE ALL LAYOUTS CONTAINED IN THE MAINTAINED IN EXCELLENT CONDITION WHILE ON THE JOBSITE. LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT SHALL INSPECT CONSTRUCTION DOCUMENTS PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION. PLANT MATERIAL UPON ARRIVAL TO JOBSTTE AND WILL REJECT PLANT MATERIAL THAT DOES NOT MEET rowland+broughton 2. CONTRACTOR SHALL VERIFY ALL CONDITIONS AT JOB SITE AND NOTIFY LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT AND THE STANDARDS DESCRIBED WITHIN THE CONTRACT DOCUMENTS. archltecture / urban design / interior design GENERAL CONTRACTOR OF DIMENSIONAL ERRORS, OMISSIONS OR DISCREPANCIES BEFORE BEGINNING 2. WRITTEN DIMENSIONS SHALL TAKE PRECEDENCE OVER SCALED DIMENSIONS. DO NOT SCALE ANY WORK DIMENSIONS FROM REDUCED DRAWINGS. 2. THE LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT WILL PERIODICALLY INSPECT PLANT MATERIAL STOCKPILED AND/OR PLANTED 234 e hopkins ave 1830 blake st ste 200 ON SITE DURING â„¢E COURSE OF CONSTRUCTION. PLANT MATERIAL NOT MEETING THE STANDARDS 303.308.1373 0 denver. co 80202 3. CONTRACTOR TO OBTAIN ALL NECESSARY PERMITS PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION. ALL CONTRACTORS MUST 3. DIMENSIONS REFERRED TO AS "EQUAL" INDICATE SPACING WHICH IS EQUIDISTANT MEASURED TO THE CONTAINED WITHIN CONTRACT DOCUMENTS SHALL BE REPLACED AT NO COST TO THE OWNER. 970 5443473 f 303 308 1375 f COMPLY WITH PERMIT REQUIREMENTS, LOCAL, STATE AND FEDERAL JURISDICTIONS AND GOVERNING CENTERLINES. BODIES/AGENCIES RULES AND REGULATIONS AND LAND USE APPROVAL CONDITIONS AT ALL TIMES, 3. PROVIDE MATCHING SIZES AND FORMS FOR EACH PLANT OF THE SAME SPECIES UNLESS OTHERWISE 4. MEASUREMENTS ARE TO THE FINISHED FACE OF BUILDINGS, WALLS, OR OTHER FIXED SITE INDICATED. 4. WORK PERFORMED WITHOUT APPROVAL OF LOCAL, STATE AND FEDERAL JURISDICTIONS AND GOVERNING IMPROVEMENTS. DIMENSIONS TO CENTERLINES ARE IDENTIFIED AS SUCH. BODIES/AGENCIES AND/OR NOT IN COMPUANCE WITH SPECIFICATIONS AND/OR DRAWINGS I5 SUBJECT 4. CONTRACTOR TO VERIFY ALL QUANTITIES. IN CASE OF DISCREPANCIES, GRAPHICALLY SHOWN TO REMOVAL AT CONTRACTOR'S EXPENSE. 5. INSTALL_ INTERSECTING ELEMENTS AT 90-DEGREE ANGLES, UNLESS OTHERWISE INDICATED. MAINTAIN QUANTITIES SHALL TAKE PRECEDENCE. HORIZONTAL AUGNMENT OF ADJACENT ELEMENTS AS INDICATED IN CONTRACT DOCUMENTS. 5. ALL WORK SHALL CONFORM TO THE APPROPRIATE AGENCIES. CONTRACTOR SHALL VERIFY LOCATION OF 5. ALL MATERIALS USED SHALL CONFORM TO THE GUIDELINES ESTABLISHED BY THE CURRENT AMERICAN ALL EXISTING UTILITIES, LINES AND STRUCTURES PRIOR TO EXCAVATION OR TRENCHING. DAMAGE 6. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL PROVIDE A FULL-SCALE MOCKUP AND RECEIVE APPROVAL FROM THE LANDSCAPE STANDARDS FOR NURSERY STOCK, PUBLISHED BY THE AMERICAN ASSOCIATION OF NURSERYMEN. SHALL BE REPAIRED BY THE CONTRACTOR AT NO COST TO THE OWNER. THE LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT ARCHCTECT FOR ALL SYSTEMS BEFORE BEGINNING CONSTRUCTION OF PAVEMENT. Consultants ASSUMES NO RESPONSIBILITY FOR UTILITIES OR STRUCTURES NOT SHOWN ON THE DUWINGS. 6. ALL PLANT MATERIAL SHALL BE INSTALLED PLUMB AND PER THE SPECIFICATIONS CONTAINED WITHIN THE CONTRACTOR IS TO VERIFY THE EXACT LOCATION OF UTILITIES PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION AND NOTIFY 7. EXPANSION JOINTS SHALL BE PROVIDED WHERE FLATWORK MEETS VERTICAL STRUCTURES, SUCH AS CONTRACT DOCUMENTS. ANY NECESSARY STAKING AND/OR OTHER SUPPORTS MATERIALS/METHODS THE LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT OF ANY DISCREPANCIES. CONTRACTOR SHALL USE EXTREME CAUTION WHEN WALLS, CURBS, STEPS, AND OTHER HARDSCAPE ELEMENTS. EXPANSION JOINTS SHALL ALSO BE SHALL BE SUBMITTED TO THE LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT FOR REVIEW AND APPROVAL PRIOR TO WORKING OVER OR NEAR EXISTING GAS AND ELECTRICAL UNES. PROVIDED AT MATERIAL CHANGES. EXPANSION JOINT MATERIALS/METHODS SHALL BE SUBMITTED TO INSTALLATION. 6. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR RESETTING ALL LAND MONUMENTS DISRUPTED BY 7. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL PRUNE EXISTING AND/OR NEW TREES ONLY PER LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT bluegreen CONSTRUCTION ACTIVmES OR NEGLIGENCE ON THE PART OF THE CONTRACTOR. RESETS SHALL BE 8. CONTROL JOINTS SHOULD BE SPACED NO GREATER â„¢AN TEN ( 10) LINEAR FEET MAXIMUM, UNLESS DIRECTION. 300 s spring st, suite 202 aspen, co 81611 PERFORMED UNDER THE SUPERVISION OF A REGISTERED LAND SURVEYOR AND MONUMENT RECORDS OTHERWISE SPECIFIED. EXPANSION JOINTS SHOULD BE SPACED NO GREATER THAN FORTY (40) LINEAR 970.429.7499 0 MUST BE FILED AS REQUIRED BY STATUTE FOR ALL MONUMENTS. FEET MAXIMUM, UNLESS OTHERWISE SPECIFIED. CONTRACTOR SHALL ADVISE ON OTHER JOINTS AS 8. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL STAKE THE LOCATIONS OF ALL TREES AND B&B SHRUBS FOR LANDSCAPE NEEDED TO MINIMIZE CRACKING. THIS INFORMATION SHALL BE SUBMITTED TO THE LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT REVIEW AND APPROVAL, PRIOR TO INSTALLATION. www.bluegreenaspen.com 7. ALL CONSTRUCTION AND MATERIALS NOT SPECIFICALLY ADDRESSED IN THE CONTRACT DOCUMENTS OR ~~ ARCH~~~~FO~~~I~EW~AN~D~A~PP~~~~L~U~O~ ~9~~~=~1~' ~ 910 429 9499 f SPECIFICATIONS SHALL BE IN ACCORDANCE WrTH LOCAL, STATE AND FEDERAL JURISDICTIONS AND 9. ALL ROOT-WRAPPING MATERIALS THAT ARE NOT BIO-DEGRADABLE SHALL BE REMOVED FROM â„¢E ROOT GOVERNING BODIES/AGENCIES STANDARDS. 9. CONTROL JOINTS SHALL BE PROVIDED AS SPECIFIED IN THE CONTRACT DOCUMENTS. CONTROL JOINT BALL. ROOT BALLS SHALL BE FREE OF WEEDS. MATERIALS, METHODS AND RECOMMENDATIONS ON ADDrTIONAL CONTROL JOINTS TO MINIMIZE 8. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL TAKE ALL PRECAUTIONARY MEASURES NECESSARY TO PROTECT EXISTING CRACKING SHALL BE SUBMITTED TO THE LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT FOR REVIEW AND APPROVAL. 10. SPECIFIED PLANT MATERIAL SIZES SHALL BE CONSIDERED MINIMUM SIZES. IMPROVEMENTS FROM DAMAGE AND ALL SUCH IMPROVEMENTS AND STRUCTURES DAMAGED BY THE CONTRACTOR'S OPERATIONS SHALL BE REPAIRED OR RECONSTRUCTED SATISFACTORY TO THE 10. ALL STEPS SHALL HAVE FOURTEEN (14) INCH TREADS AND SIX (6) INCH RISERS, UNLESS OTHERWISE 11. FINISH GRADE OF PLANTING BEDS SHALL BE ONE (1) INCH BELOW ADJACENT FLATWORK, UNLESS LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT AT THE CONTRACTOR'S EXPENSE. SPECIFIED. SPECIFIED OTHERWISE. Issue. 9. ALL BARRICADING AND TEMPORARY TRAFFIC CONTROL DEVICES OR METHODS USED DURING 11. HOLD TOP OF WALLS AND FENCES LEVEL, UNLESS OTHERWISE SPECIFIED. 12. MULCH OR PLANTING BED DRESSING SHALL BE PLACED IN ALL PLANTING AREAS AS SPECIFIED. MULCH OR 07.14.15 CONSTRUCTION SHALL BE IN ACCORDANCE WrTH LOCAL, STATE AND FEDERAL JURISDICTIONS AND PLANTING BED DRESSING SHALL NOT BE PLACED WITHIN SIX (6) INCHES OF TREE TRUNKS. MULCHING PLANNED DEVELOPMENT GOVERNING BODIES/AGENCIES STANDARDS. PROVIDE ADEQUATE TIME FOR REVIEW AND APPROVAL BY 12. CONTRACTOR SHALL NOT INSTALL WORK LOCATED ON TOP OF ARCHITECTURAL STRUCTURES WITHOUT SHOULD BE REPEATED ANNUALLY DURING THE AUTUMN TO A THREE (3) INCH DEPTH. DETAILED REVIEW APPLICATION THE ABOVE JURISDICTIONS PRIOR TO COMMENCEMENT. FIRST REVIEWING ARCHITECTURAL DRAWINGS. 13. ALL PLANT MATERIAL SHOULD RECEIVE AN ORGANIC FERTILIZER IN LIMITED APPLICATION FOLLOWING 10, THE LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT IS NOT RESPONSIBLE FOR THE CONSTRUCTION MEANS, METHODS, 13. SAMPLES OF SPECIFIED MATERIALS SHALL BE SUBMITTED TO THE LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT FOR REVIEW INSTALLATION. TYPE AND APPLICATION RATE AND METHOD OF APPLICATION TO BE SPECIFIED BY THE TECHNIQUES, SEQUENCES UTIUZED OR FOR SAFETY PRECAUTIONS OR PROBLEMS IN CONNECTION WITH AND APPROVAL PRIOR TO ORDERING FOR JOB. CONTRACTOR AND APPROVED BY THE LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT. THE WORK. THE LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT WILL NOT BE RESPONSIBLE FOR THE CONTRACTOR'S FAILURE TO CARRY OUT THE WORK IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE CONTRACT DOCUMENTS. CONTRACT DOCUMENTS 14. EXCESS FERTILIZER SHALL BE DISPOSED OF PROPERLY OFF-SITE. IT SHALL NOT BE DISPOSED OF IN INCLUDE THE CONSTRUCTION DOCUMENT DRAWING SET/TECHNICAL SPECIFICATIONS MANUAL,/LASIS. STORM DRAINS AND/OR DRYWELLS. 11. CONTRACTOR TO VERIFY ALL QUANTITIES. IN CASE OF ANY DISCREPANCIES, GRAPHICALLY SHOWN 15. STOCKPILED PLANT MATERIAL TO BE PLACED IN THE SHADE AND PROPERLY HAND-WATERED UNTIL MATERIAL QUANTITIES SHALL TAKE PRECEDENCE. PLANTED. 12. A SYSTEM OF DIAGRAMMATIC SYMBOLS, HATCHES AND NOTATIONS IS USED IN THESE DRAWINGS, GRADING NOTES 16. MINI-NUGG ET TYPE DECORATIVE BARK MULCH WILL BE USED TO RETURN NUTRIENTS TO THE SOIL, REVIEW NOTATIONS CAREFULLY, NOTIFY LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT AND REQUEST CLARIFICATION OF ANY REDUCE MAINTENANCE AND MINIMIZE EVAPORATION FOR AREAS APPROXIMATE TO THE RESIDENCE. UNCLEAR NOTATION OR DISCREPANCY PRIOR TO COMMENCING WORK. LARGER SHREDDED BARK MULCH WILL BE USED FOR STEEP AREAS SO SLOUGHING IS LESS LIKELY TO 1. VERIFY EXISTING ELEVATIONS PRIOR TO STARTING WORK. NOTIFY LANDSOAPE ARCHITECT OF ANY OCCUR. 13. PROVIDE SLEEVES AS REQUIRED FOR DRAINAGE, IRRIGATION AND ELECTRICAL UNES. IRRIGATION AND DISCREPANCIES. EXISTING AND PROPOSED GRADES ARE BASED ON SURVEY DOCUMENTS PREPARED BY ELECTRICAL SLEEVES AND SUBSURFACE DUINAGE SYSTEMS SHALL BE CONSTRUCTED PRIOR TO PAVING SURVEYOR. 17. PRESERVE & PROTECT ALL EXISTING VEGETATION INDICATED TO REMAIN AT ALL TIMES. AND LANDSCAPE WORK. UTILITY SLEEVES ARE REQUIRED IN ALL PLANT BEDS ISOLATED BY PAVEMENT OR ANY OTHER STRUCTURES. 2. CONTRACTOR SHALL VERIFY THE PLACEMENT OF FLATWORK PENETRATIONS TO ENSURE COORDINATION 18. ALL VEGETATION PROPOSED FOR OUTSIDE THE BUILDING ENVELOPE TO BE NATIVE UNLESS OTHERWISE OF SURFACE FIXTURES, SUCH AS DRAINS AND LIGHTS. NOTIFY GENERAL CONTRACTOR AND LANDSCAPE NOTED. PLANTING THAT OCCURS OUTSIDE THE BUILDING ENVELOPE IS FOR RE5TORATION PURPOSES 14. SPECIAL CONSIDERATION IS GIVEN TO THE DESIGN AND INTENDED RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN ARCHITECT OF DISCREPANCIES PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION OF FLATWORK. ONLY OR IS SPECIFIC TO UTILITIES RESTORATION. ARCHITECTURE, PLANTING AREAS AND PAVING SYSTEMS. PAVEMENT JOINTING, PAVERS, STONE, FINISHES AND GRADES HAVE BEEN STRICTLY COORDINATED IN THE CONTRACT DOCUMENTS. 3. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL REFER TO THE ARCHITECTUUL DRAWINGS TO VERIFY FINISHED FLOOR 19. SIX (6) INCH PLANT MIX SHALL BE PROVIDED FOR ALL LAWN, TURF, AND NATIVE PLANTING ZONES. 18 CONSTRUCTION OF THESE SYSTEMS SHALL BE STRICTLY COORDINATED. ELEVATIONS. THE GENERAL CONTRACTOR AND LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT SHALL BE NOTIFIED IF THERE ARE INCH PLANT MIX SHALL BE PROVIDED FOR ALL PERENNIAL PLANTING BEDS UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED. ANY DISCREPANCIES PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION. 15. VEHICLES, EQUIPMENT, AND/OR MATERIALS SHALL NOT BE PARKED OR STORED IN AREAS OF EXISTING VEGETATION, INCLUDING WrIHIN THE DRIPLINE OF EXISTING TREES TO REMAIN. 4. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL REFER TO THE MECHANICAL DRAWINGS TO VERIFY DRAIN LOCATIONS OVER STRUCTURE. THE GENERAL CONTUCTOR AND LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT SHALL BE NOTIFIED OF ANY 16. LANDSCAPE MATERIALS TO BE STORED UNDER SECURED TARPS OR SHEETING TO PROTECT AGAINST DISCREPANCIES PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION. SOIL EROSION CONTROL NOTES WIND, RAIN, AND SNOW DAMAGE. 5. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL REFER TO THE CIVIL ENGINEERING DRAWINGS TO VERIFY UTILITY AND OTHER 17. CONSTRUCTION WASTE-INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO: PLANT MATERIAL, BUILDING MATERIALS, DRAIN LOCATIONS. THE GENERAL CONTUCTOR AND LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT SHALL BE NOTIFIED OF ANY 1. PRIOR TO BEGINNING ANY EARTH CHANGE, THE CONTRACTOR SHALL INSTALL AND MAINTAIN ALL SESC DEMOLISHED MATERIALS, PACKAGING, LEFTOVER PAINT AND CONCRETE SLURRY-SHOULD BE PROPERLY DISCREPANCIES PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION. MEASURES AS SHOWN ON THE CONTRACT DOCUMENTS AND AS REQUIRED BY ANY GOVERNING AGENCIES. REUSED, RECYCLED, DISPOSED OF LEGALLY OFF-SITE OR IN DESIGNATED WASH-OUT AREAS DETERMINED 2. ALL SESC MEASURES TO BE MAINTAINED DAILY. BY THE GENERAL CONTRACTOR. 6. PROPOSED ELEVATIONS INDICATED ON DRAWINGS ARE FINISHED GRADE ELEVATIONS. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL- DIRECT ROUGH GRADE WORK TO ALLOW FOR SUFFICIENT TOPSOIL AND OTHER 3. THE CONTRACTOR TO CONDUCT ALL- EXCAVATION, FILLING, GRADING, AND CLEANUP OPERATIONS IN A 18. RECYCLING AND TRASH BINS TO BE PROVIDED ON SITE. SEPARATE BINS FOR CARDBOARD, CO-MINGLED, FINISHED CONDmONS AS DESCRIBED IN THE CONTRACT DOCUMENTS. MANNER SUCH THAT SEDIMENT, GENERATED BY WIND OR WATER IS NOT DISCHARGED INTO ANY STORM AND OTHER RECYCLABLE/REUSABLE MATERIALS IDENTIFIED BY THE LOCAL JURISDICTION SHALL BE SEWER, DRAINAGE DrTCH, RIVER, LAKE, AIR, OR UNDERGROUND UTILITY SYSTEM. STAGE WORK To SKY HOTEL MAINTAINED. ALL BINS TO BE WILDLIFE-PROOF. 7. ALL FINISHED GRADES SHALL MEET AND BLEND SMOOTHLY WITH EXISTING GRADES AT THE PROJECT MINIMIZE THE AREA OF EXPOSED SOIL, THEREBY REDUCING THE OPPORTUNITY FOR SOIL EROSION. LIMIT. 19. ON-SITE FUEL STORAGE FOR CONSTRUCTION EQUIPMENT IS DISCOURAGED, CONSTRUCTION EQUIPMENT 4. WATER FROM TRENCHES AND OTHER EXCAVATION TO BE PUMPED INTO A FILTRATION BAG TO REMOVE USED ON SITE TO BE CHECKED REGULARLY TO ASSURE CONTAMINATION CONCERNS FROM OILS AND 8. ALL FINISHED GRADES SHALL BE WITHOUT LOW SPOTS OR POCKETS. CONTRACTOR SHAU SET FLOW SEDIMENTS FROM THE WATER. GREASES ARE ELIMINATED. NO TOXIC MATERIALS SHALL BE STORED ON-SITE. LINES ACCURATELY AND PROVIDE A MINIMUM OF TWO (2) PERCENT OR MAXIMUM OF FIFTY (50) PERCENT, UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED. 5. NORTH AMERICAN GREEN SC-150 OR EQUIVALENT EROSION CONTROL FABRIC IS REQUIRED ON AU 20. GENERAL CONTRACTOR TO KEEP ALL ITEMS IMPLEMENTED BY LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT IN PROPER DISTURBED SLOPES GREATER â„¢AN 3: 1 UNTIL PROJECT AREA IS REVEGETATED PER THE PLANTING PLAN. 709 E. DURANT AVENUE WORKING ORDER THROUGHOUT THE DURATION OF THE PROJECT. 9. ALL FINISHED GRADES SHALL- PRESENT SMOOTH TRANSITIONS BETWEEN TOES AND TOPS OF SLOPES. ASPEN, CO 81611 6. PROVIDE POSITIVE DRAINAGE AWAY FROM ALL STRUCTURES. 21. THE CONSTRUCTION SITE TO BE INSPECTED ON A MONTHLY BASIS BY LANDSCAPE ARCHTTECT AND/OR 10. THE MAXIMUM SLOPE OF SOD TO BE 3:1 IN AREAS DESIGNATED AS " LAWN," UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED. CIVIL ENGINEER TO ASSURE THAT THE SILT FENCE AND MUD TRACKING PAD ARE PROPERLY IN PLACE AND 7. CONTRACTOR TO PROVIDE ONSITE WATERING TO REDUCE FUGITIVE DUST LEAVING THE SITE DURING FUNCTIONING AS DESIGNED. 11. ALL MAN HOLES, VALVE BOXES, UTILITY BOXES AND PEDESTALS, AND OTHER APPURTENANCES SHALL BE CONSTRUCTION. ADJUSTED TO FINISH GRADE IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE LOCAL, STATE AND FEDERAL JURISDICTIONS 22. GREEN BUILDING PRACTICES SHALL BE EMPLOYED TO THE EXTENT FEASIBLE. SUCH PRACTICES INCLUDE: AND GOVERNING BODIES/AGENCIES OR UTILITY RULES AND REGULATIONS, UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED. 8. SOIL EROSION CONTROL MEASURES TO BE PROVIDED FOR ALL EXISTING AND PROPOSED DRAINAGE CARPOOLING/VANPOOLING TO JOB SITE, MINIMIZING MATERIALS PACKING BEFORE ARRIVAL TO 108 SITE, STRUCTURES WITHIN THE PROJECT- LIMITS. REDUCING MATERIAL/RESOURCE INEFFICIENCIES BY COORDINATING WORK. 12. SOIL COMPACTION BENEATH PAVEMENTS, STEPS, WALLS AND UGHT FOUNDATIONS SHALL BE 95% PROCTOR DENSITY MINIMUMI, UNLESS OTHERWISE SPECIFIED. 9. CONSTRUCTION STAGING AND PHASING SHALL OCCUR, WHERE APPLICABLE, TO MINIMIZE SOIL 23. IF SITE WORK IS DELAYED DUE TO ANY CIRCUMSTANCE; THE CONTRACTOR SHALL- PROTECT PREPARED DISTURBANCE TIME. PLANT BEDS FROM EROSION. 13. GRADING AND EXCAVATION WORK SHALL BE COMPLETED DURING DRY AND NON-FREEZING WEATHER CONDITIONS. 10. BEST MANAGEMENT PRACTICES (EMPs) SHALL BE ADJUSTED AS NEEDED TO MEET ANY OTHER UNFORESEEN 24. EXISTING TREES TO BE PRESERVED SHALL BEAR SAME RELATIONSHIP TO FINISHED GRADE AS THEY BEAR CONDITIONS. 14. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL REMOVE AND STOCKPILE TOPSOIL FOR REUSE ON-SITE. SOIL SHALL BE TO PRE-CONSTRUCTION GRADE. SCREENED TO REMOVE ROCKS AND SOULDERS. 11. THE GENERAL CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FOR INSTALLING A MUD TRACKING PAD/WASHING PAD AT 25. EXISTING TREES TO BE PRESERVED SHALL BE PROTECTED WITH STURDY, WEATHERPROOF FENCING AT A THE CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCES TO MINIMIZE MUD DETACHMENT FROM TRUCK TIRES. 1-1/2 INCH 15. IF STRUCTURAL SOIL IS FOUND ON-SITE, THE CONTRACTOR SHALL REUSE. SCREENED ROCK TO BE PLACED ON MIRAFI 140-N FILTER FABRIC. ADDmONAL CLEAN GRAVEL TO BE MINIMUM FOUR (4) FEET HEIGHT INSTALLED NO CLOSER TO THE TREE TRUNK THAN ITS DRIPLINE. THIS FENCE SHALL BE MAINTAINED IN WORKING ORDER DURING ALL PHASES OF CONSTRUCTION, MAINTAIN ADDED THROUGHOUT THE DURATION OF CONSTRUCTION AS NEEDED. 16. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL PREVENT SOIL LOSS TO WIND AND WATER EROSION. PROJECT NO TREE PROTECTION ZONES FREE OF WEEDS AND TRASH. 12. CONTRACTOR SHALL- ABIDE BY THE LOCAL, STATE AND FEDERAL JURISDICTIONS AND GOVERNING 21406 17. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL PROVIDE POSITIVE DRAINAGE AWAY FROM ALL STRUCTURES. BODIES/AGENCIES CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT PLAN REQUIREMENTS. DWG FILE' 26. NO WORK SHALL BE CONDUCTED WITHIN THE DRIPLINE, UNLESS REVIEWED AND APPROVED BY THE LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT. ALL WORK APPROVED WrTHIN THE DRIPLINE SHALL BE COMPLETED BY HAND. BG L SERIES SKY HOTEL.dwg PROTECT ROOT SYSTEMS FROM PONDING, ERODING, OR EXCESSIVE WETTING. 18. THE GENERAL CONTRACTOR SHALL INSTALL & MAINTAIN TEMPORARY DRAINAGE DEVICES DURING 13. RESEED AS INDICATED IN SEEDING NOTES. CONSTRUCTION. 27. THE PROJECT LIMIT OF CONSTRUCTION AND ALL EXISTING VEGETATION TO REMAIN IS TO BE CLEARLY SHEET TITLE DEFINED BY STURDY, WEATHERPROOF FENCING AT A MINIMUM OF FOUR (4) FEET HIGH. 19. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL VERIFY ALL CONTROL POINTS, FINISH FLOOR ELEVATIONS & PROPOSED SPOT NOTES ELEVATIONS WITH LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT PRIOR TO FORMWORK INSTALLATION. 28. WATERPROOFING OF SUBGRADE AND OTHER ARCHITECTURAL SPACES BELOW AND/OR ADJACENT TO IMPROVEMENTS DESIGNED BY THE LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT IS TO BE ADEQUATELY DESIGNED AND DETAILED BY OTHERS TO PERMANENTLY REPEL ALL WATER SOURCES INCLUDING, BUT NOT UMBED TO: PRECIPITATION, SNOW MELT, STORM WATER RUNOFF, GROUND WATER, IRRIGATION, ROOF RUNOFF, SCALE: GROUND WATER, AND PLUMBING LEAKS. 29. STRUCTURAL DESIGN TO SUPPORT IMPROVEMENTS DESIGNED BY THE LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT AND LOCATED ABOVE, BELOW, AND/OR ADJACENT TO SUBGRADE AND OTHER ARCHITECTURAL SPACES IS THE LOO1 RESPONSIBILITY OF THE STRUCTURAL ENGINEER. THE STRUCTURAL DESIGN SHOULD BE ADEQUATELY DESIGNED TO SUPPORT ALL- POSSIBLE LOADS INCLUDING, BUT NOT LIMITED TO: BACKFILL, COMPACTION, PLANTINGS, HARDSCAPES, RETAINING AND FREESTANDING SITE WALLS, AND CONSTRUCTION g:=A====7&;w---*~0 MATERIALS/EQUIPMENT/ACTIVITY. gEEm,~ 40 ~~T c* -- -TMOLITT~ -K~ f 1 ==r-0.-~5-=y-l- rIr rowland+broughton SEEDING NOTES IRRIGATION NOTES SITEWORK ABBREVIATIONS architectur. / urban destIn linterior de:gn 234 e hopkins ave 1830 blake st. ste 200 aspen. co 81611 denver. co 80202 1. ALL NEWLY REGRADED SLOPES TO BE REVEGETATED IN THE FOLLOWING MANNER: 1. IRRIGATION PLAN IS CONCEPTUAL; FURTHER DESIGN TO BE COMPLETED BY IRRIGATION APPROX APPROXIMATE MIN MINIMUM 970.5449006 0 303.308.1373 0 CONTRACTOR/DESIGNER. ARCH ARCHTTECT MISC MISCELLANEOUS 970544 3473f 303 308.1375 f 2. MINIMUM SIX (6) INCHES OF TOPSOIL TO BE PLACED IN AREAS TO RECEIVE SEED; TOPSOtL TO BE GOOD AVG AVERAGE MT[D MOUNTED CLEAN ORGANIC SOIL (FREE OF WEEDS AND ROCKS). 2. IRRIGATION SYSTEM SHALL BE DESIGNED TO CONSERVE WATER TO THE EXTENT POSSIBLE THROUGH THE B&B BALLED AND BURLAP Mll METAL USE OF EFFICIENT HEADS, MICROCLIMATE-SPECIFIC ZONES AND A WEATHER AND MOISTURE BC BOTTOM OF CURB NIC NOT IN CONTRACT 3. SEED MIXTURES AND FERTILIZER SHALL BE APPLIED PER THE GOVERNING JURISDICTIONS' MONITORING CONTROL STATION. BF BOTTOM OF FOOTING NO NUMBER REQUIREMENTS. BM BENCHMARK NOM NOMINAL 3. ALL NEW TREES AND SHRUBS TO RECEIVE DRIP-TYPE IRRIGATION. BW BOTTOM OF WAU NTS NOT TO SCALE 4. ALL SEED MUST BEE CERTIFIED WEED FREE. NO SEED CAN CONTAIN ANY SPECIES ON THE CITY, COUNâ„¢ BRG BEARING OC ON CENTER OR STATE NOXIOUS WEED LISTS. SEED MIXES SHALL HAVE THE CERTIFIED SEED BLUE TAG OR SOURCE 4. ALL REVEGETATED AREAS TO RECEIVE SPRAY-TYPEE IRRIGATION FOR FIRST TWO GROWING SEASONS CL CENTERLINE OD OUTSIDE DIAMETER IDENTIFIED SEED (YELLOW TAG). ONLY SEED WITH A COMPLETE ANALYSIS LABEL ON THE BAG AND A MINIMUM. CAL CALIPER OPP OPPOSITE CURRENT GERMINATION TEE CONDUCTED BY AN ACCREDITED LABORATORY WILL BE ACCEPTED. CAP CAPACITY PA PLANTINGAREA Consultants 5. ALL PERENNIAL BEDS TO RECEIVE SPRAY-TYPE IRRIGATION. CHAM CHAMFER PAR PARALLEL 5. SEEDING SHALL OCCUR IN THE EARLY SPRING AND LATE FALL; SEEDING SHALL NOT BE DONE WHEN THE CIP CAST IN PLACE POB POINT OF BEGINNING GROUND IS FROZEN. FOR WARM SEASON SPECIES, SEEDING IN LATE SPRING OR EARLY SUMMER IS MORE 6. ALL SPRAY TYPE IRRIGATION TO BE DIRECTED AWAY FROM STRUCTURES. CJ CONTROL JOINT POC POINT OF CURVATURE LIKELY TO ACCOMPANY TEMPERATURES WARM ENOUGH TO SUPPORT GERMINATION, SEED THE SITE AS CLR CLEARANCE PERF PERFORATED SOON AS FINAL GRADING AND TOPSOIL PLACEMENT HAVE OCCURRED TO MINIMIZE EROSION AND WEED 7. INSTALL SPRAY HEADS ALONG SIDEWALKS ON POP-UP RISERS. CO CLEAN OUT PED PEDESTRIAN bluegreen ESTABLISHMENT ON THE PROJECT. DURING PERIODS OF TIME WHEN SEEDING CANNOT BE COMP COMPACTED PI POINT OF INTERSECTION ACCOMPLISHED, SOILS SHAU NOT REMAIN UNPROTECTED. 8. LOCATE HEADS SO THEY ARE PROTECTED FROM TRAVEL AND DO NOT CAUSE WATER TO FALL ON PAVED, CONC CONCRETE PL PROPERTY UNE 300 s sping st. suite 202 MASONRY, OR OTHER ARCHITECTURAL SURFACES. CONSTR CONSTRUCTION PT POINT, POINT OF TANGENCY aspen, co 81611 970.429.7499 0 6. UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED, HAND BROADCAST OF SEED SHALL BE USED ON ALL SLOPES, INCLUDING CONT CONTINUOUS PVC POLYVINYL CHLORIDE 970.429.9499 f THOSE THAT ARE STEEP (GREATER THAN 3: 1), EXTREMELY ROCKY, REMOTE OR INACCESSIBLE. SEED 9. ADJUST HEAD LOCATION IF SPRAY IS DETRIMENTAL TO OR BLOCKED BY TREE, SHRUB, OR STRUCTURE, CONTR CONTRACTOR PVMT PAVEMENT ~ wiwÂ·bluegreenas~n ~m RATE WILL VARY PER SEED MIXTURE SPECIFIED. BROADCAST SEEDING REQUIRES DOUBLE OR TRIPLE THE MAINTAINING EVEN COVERAGE OF PLANTING AREAS. CU CUBIC PVR PAVER SEEDING RATE OF DRILL SEEDING, AND CALIBRATION OF SEEDING RATES IS LESS PRECISE THAN WITH CF CUBIC FEET QNTY QUANTITY DRILL- SEEDING. SOILS TO BE UKED OR HARROWED TO ELIMINATE CRUSTING BEFORE ACCEPTING 10. GENERAL CONTRACTOR TO COORDINATE SIZE AND LOCATION OF SLAB PENETRATIONS FOR IRRIGATION DBL DOUBLE R RADIUS BROADCAST SEED. CARE SHAU BE TAKEN TO ENSURE UNIFORM COVERAGE (EVEN SEED APPLICATION EQUIPMENT WITH MECHANICAL CONTRACTORS, DF DIRECTION OF FLOW RECEP RECEFTACLE RATES) OVER THE AREA, AND SEEDING SHALL NOT OCCUR DURING WINDY WEATHER. DEG DEGREE REF REFERENCE 11. INSTALL MAIN LINES TO SLOPE AT 1% MINIMUM TO MANUAL DRAIN VALVES LOCATED AT LOW POINTS OF DEMO DEMOLISH, DEMOLITION REINF REINFORCED 7. HAND RAKE SEED INTO TOPSOIL NO MORE THAN 3/4 INCH DEEP TO COVER. SOIL /SEED CONTACT IS MAIN SYSTEM. DTL DETAIL REM REMOVE CRmCAL FOR GROWTH. DWG DRAWING REQD REQUIRED Issue: 12. INSTALL 3/4 INCH POLYETHYLENE LATERAL LINES TO SLOPE AT 1% MINIMUM TO AUTOMATIC DRAIN EA EACH REV REVISION, REVISED 8. DRILL- SEEDING, WHEN INDICATED ON DRAWINGS, MAY BE APPROVED BY LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT ON VALVES LOCATED AT LOW POINTS OF LATERAL SYSTEMS. EJ EXPANSION JOINT ROW RIGHT OF WAY 07.14.15 SLOPES OF 3: 1 OR FLATTER, BUT NOT IN AREAS OF EXTREMELY ROCKY SOILS. SEED TO A DEPTH OF 1/4 EL ELEVATION SAN SANITARY PLANNED DEVELOPMENT TO 1/2 INCH. DRILL TUBE SPACING SHOULD BE SIX (6) TO SEVEN (7) INCHES. SEEDING SHOULD BE 13- TRENCHES TO BE OF SUFFICIENT DEPTH TO PROVIDE 18 INCHES OF COVER OVER LATERAL LINES. ELEC ELECTRICAL SCH SCHEDULE DETAILED REVIEW APPLICATION CONDUCTED ALONG THE SLOPE'S CONTOUR TO AVOID EROSION FROM WATER FLOWING DOWN DRILL SLEEVED LINES SHALL HAVE A MINIMUM COVER OF 24 INCHES. TRENCHES ARE TO BE BACKFILLED WITH ENG ENGINEER SD STORM DRAIN FURROWS. SEEDING RATE TO BE SIX (6) TO TEN (10) PURE LIVE SEED LBS PER ACRE. MATERIAL FREE OF ROCKS GREATER THAN 3/4 INCHES IN DIAMETER. EQ EQUAL SEC SECTION EQUIP EQUIPMENT SF SQUARE FOOT (FEET) 9. HYDROSEEDING, WHEN INDICATED ON DRAWINGS, SHALL BE SPRAYED ON A ROUGHENED SLOPE USING A 14. INSTALL BACKFLOW PREVENTOR(S) IN COORDINATION WITH GENERAL CONTRACTOR, BACKFLOW EST ESTIMATE SHT SHEET HYDROSEEDING MACHINE AND SHALL BE USED TO REACH AREAS THAT ARE INACCESSIBLE BY BROADCAST PREVENTORS SHALL BE INSTALLED PLUMB AND SQUARE WITH ADJACENT PAVEMENT EDGES OR EW EACH WAY SIM SIMILAR METHODS. USE TO BE LIMITED TO STEEP (GREATER THAN 3: 1), INACCESSIBLE SLOPES IN AREAS WITH STRUCTURES. COLOR, BLACK. EXIST EXISTING SNT SEALANT ADEQUATE AND DEPENDABLE MOISTURE DURING THE GROWING SEASON, HYDROMULCHING MUST OCCUR EXP EXPANSION, EXPOSED SPECS SPECIFICATIONS AS A SEPARATE PROCESS AFTER HYDROSEEDING. DO NOT MIX SEED AND MULCH TOGETHER IN ONE 15. CONTROL VALVE BOX AND HEAD BOX LOCATÂ·IONS TO BE APPROVED BY LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT PRIOR TO FFE FINISH FLOOR ELEVATION SQ SQUARE WATER APPLICATION PROCESS AS THIS WILL PREVENT SEEDS FROM COMING INTO CONTACT WITH THE INSTALLATION. COLOR, BLACK. FG FINISHED GRADE STA STATION SOIL. FIN FINISH STD STANDARD 16. THE FINAL LOCATION AND EXACT POSITIONING OF THE AUTOMATIC CONTROLLER SHALL BE APPROVED BY FL FLOW LINE STL STEEL 10. THE SITE MUST BE MULCHED WITH WEED-FREE MULCH (HAY OR HYDROMULCH} AFTER SEEDING. THE OWNERÂ·S AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE OR GENERAL CONTRACTOR PRIOR TO INSTALLATION. FOC FACE OF CONCRETE STRL STRUCTURAL FS FINISH SURFACE SYM SYMMETRICAL 11. HAY MULCH MUST BE WEED-FREE, HAY TO BE ~CRIMPED' INTO THE SOIL- SURFACE BY HAND ON STEEP 17. VALVE BOXES SHALL BE INSTALLED FLUSH WrTH FINISH GRADE AND AUGN VALVE BOXES WITH ADJACENT FT FOOT T&B TOP AND BOTTOM SLOPES. ON FLAT SURFACES A MODIFIED DISC PLOW MAY BE UTILIZED TO JAM THE HAY STEMS INTO THE PAVEMENT EDGES OR STRUCTURES. VALVE BOXES SHALL BE OF PLASTIC WITH BOLT DOWN UD, FTG FOOTING TC TOP OF CURB SOIL TO REDUCE SURFACE WIND SPEEDS AND SOIL DESICCATION. APPLY AT THE RATE OF 3,000 TO GA GAUGE TF TOP OF FOOTING 4,000 LBS PER ACRE (3360-4480 KG/HA). ADD AN ORGANIC-BASED TACKIFIER AT THE RATE OF 150 LBS 18. CONCEAL ALL IRRIGATION BOXES IN PLANTING BEDS WHERE APPUCABLE AND COVER WrTH MULCH. GAL GALVANIZED THK THICK PER ACRE TO PREVENT EROSION. VALVE BOXES TO BE PLACED A MINIMUM OF 12 INCHES FROM AND PARALLEL TO CURBS AND WALKS. GC GENERAL CONTRACTOR TOPO TOPOGRAPHY GROUPED VALVES TO BE EQUALLY SPACED AND PARALLEL. COLOR, BLACK. GEN GENERAL TS TOP OF STEP 12. HYDROMULCH MUST BE APPLIED SEPARATELY FOLLOWING SEED APPLICATION. DO NOT OVERSPRAY AS HORIZONTAL TOP OF PAVEMENT/PAVER HORIZ -rp THIS MAY RESULT IN EROSION. AN ORGANIC TACKIFIER SHALL BE ADDED TO THE SLURRY TO ENHANCE 19. CONTRACTOR TO MAINTAIN A SET OF "AS-BUILT" DRAWINGS THROUGHOUT â„¢E COURSE OF HP HIGH POINT TV,~ TOP OF WALL THE DURABILITY OF THE APPLIED MULCH COVER. APPLY AT A RATE OF 3,000 LBS PER ACRE (3360 KG/HA). CONSTRUCTION, AND DELIVER THESE DRAWINGS TO OWNER'S REPRESENTATIVE & LANDSCAPE HT HEIGHT TRAS TRANSFORMER ADD AN ORGANIC-BASED TACKIFIER AT THE RATE OF 150 LBS PER ACRE TO PREVENT EROSION, ARCHITECT UPON COMPLETION OF WORK. ID INSIDE DIAMETER TR TOP OF RAMP INV INVERT ELEVATION TYP TYPICAL 13. SEEDED AREAS SHALL BE MAINTAINED FREE OF WEEDS, THUS ALLOWING THE DESIRED VEGETATION TO 20. EXCAVATIONS TO BE BACKFILLED TO 95% COMPACTION, MINIMUM. CONTRACTOR TO REPAIR SETTLED IN INCHES VAR VARIES THRIVE WITHOUT THE CROWDING TENDENCIES OF AGGRESSIVE WEEDS. TRENCHED FOR ONE YEAR AFTER COMPLETION OF WORK. CONTRACTOR TO WARRANT THAT THE SYSTEM INCL INCLUDED VERT VERTICAL WILL BE FREE FROM DEFECTS IN MATERIAL AND WORKMANSHIP FOR A PERIOD OF ONE YEAR AFTER IRR IRRIGATION VEH VEHICLE COMPLETION OF WORK. JT JOINT VOL VOLUME LIN LINEAR w/ WITH 21. EXERCISE EXTREME CARE IN EXCAVATING AND WORKING NEAR EXISTING UTILIHES AND IN EXISTING LAND LANDSCAPE W/0 WITHOUT TREE ROOT ZONES. VERIFY THE LOCATION AND CONDITION OF ALL UTILITIES AND BE RESPONSIBLE FOR LP LOW POINT WT WEIGHT DAMAGE TO ALL- UTILITIES. DAMAGE CAUSED BY OR DURING THE PERFORMANCE OF WORK TO BE LT LIGHT WWF WELDED WIRE FABRIC REPAIRED AT NO ADDITIONAL COST TO THE OWNER. FIELD ADJUST SPRINKLER LOCATIONS SO AS TO MATL MATERIAL YD YARD AVOID CONFUCTS WITH UTILITIES (FIRE HYDRANTS, TRANSFORMERS, ETC.). MAX MAXIMUM MEMB MEMBRANE 22. FLUSH AND ADJUST SPRINKLER HEADS FOR OPTIMUM PERFORMANCE. THIS SHALL INCLUDE THROTTLING MH MANHOLE THE FLOW CONTROL AT EACH VALVE TO OBTAIN â„¢E OPTIMUM OPERATING PRESSURE FOR EACH SYSTEM. SKY HOTEL 23. IRRIGATION SYSTEM TO BE COMPLETELY DRAINED TO PROTECT PIPE FROM BURSTING PRIOR TO FREEZING TEMPERATURES ANNUALLY. 24. PROVIDE SLEEVES AS REQUIRED FOR IRRIGATION LINES. IRRIGAnON SYSTEMS SHALL BE CONSTRUCTED PRIOR TO PAVING AND LANDSCAPE WORK. 709 E. DURANT AVENUE ASPEN, CO 81611 PROJECT NO 21406 DWG FILEÂ· BG L SERIES SKY HOTEL.d,vg SHEET TITLE NOTES SCALE. L002 ne â€žc~-U-* M).%y<=mCU101T I D-~ON ~(3~'U~~~~al l~~CÂ»E ~0Â«TECU ~ i yd 2!E~~1 k .*%=cÂ». ~â€¢wl'lwT-*Or,â‚¬*~2,.grE d /1 â€¢-11. Vil-,g 0.-(i câ€¢,-0 1 *El.!En Ky Hen 1_d.g DURANT STREET Vt' LEGEND . EXISTING DECIDUOUS TREE \\\ rowland+broughton archnecture / u.ban de.gn / interior design \\\ 234 ehopkinsave 1830 blake st ste 200 EXISTING EVERGREEN TREE aspan,co 81611 denver,co 80202 970.544.9006 0 303.308.1373 0 A '1 970.544 3473 f 303 308.1375 f ~~~~~ TREE TOBEREMOVED ~ .,22 1 ' ~ PROPE~IyEINE 4/ ef 1 - ~-4Tf) - -~11- - - Â» -Id. t Â· Consultants FE. Â· < <to, TREE DISPOSITION SCHEDULE - ~ # SPEC 'DBH' ACHON ASPEN VALUE bluegreen , 300 5 spring st, suite 202 1 1 1 3 L._ G . 1 4" EG REMOVE $514.96 aspen, co 81611 h \1-1 CHATEAU CHATEAU 2 7.5' DEC REMOVE $1816.00 970.429.9499 f 970.429.7499 0 DUMONT CHAUMONT 3 10.5Â· EG REMOVE $3548.00 * 4 1. DEC REMOVE 0 41 <1-7 4 5 3.5" DEC REMOVE 0 7 2.5" DEC REMOVE 0 6 2.5" DEC REMOVE 0 & 21 13 23/ (d-181 - 8 1.5 DEC REMOVE 0 9 10.5" EG REMOVE $3548.40 Issue. 10 6" DEC REMOVE 0 14 26.5" DEC NON-EXISTING 0 11 6" DEC REMOVE 0 07.14.15 PLANNED DEVELOPMENT 12 5' DEC REMOVE 0 DETAILED REVIEW APPLICATION 13 10.5 EG REMOVE $3548.40 - 15 24.5" DEC REMOVE 0 - , --2 16 5.5" DEC REMOVE 0 17 7.5' EG REMOVE 0 6'' - 186" DEC REMOVE $1158.66 : - '- ~ f U LI I 1 f --- - 1 11 ~ P 19 22 DEC REMOVE $15577.54 1- _-2. 3 [i /47' 9-- 64 20 8.5" EG REMOVE 0 22 7" EG REMOVE 0 1,M- 21 10. EG REMOVE $3218.50 23 10. EG REMOVE $3218.50 1 ALLEY 24 6" EG REMOVE 0 1 25 5" EG REMOVE 0 REMOVE 0 26 li EG REMOVE $7241.63 27 9.5 EG REMOVE 0 .b I' Â·,W ~ . 29 9 DEC REMOVE 0 ---<I-IU-;I- . 7 -9- Â¥.a- 1 rl- 30 8" DEC REMOVE 0 - 1 91 1 31 12" DEC OFF PROPERTY NOT APPLICABLE [-34*B f<CZC, 32 9.5" DEC OFF PROPERTY NOT APPLICABLE 33 7.5" EG REMOVE 0 I GLORY HOLE 1 34 9" EG REMOVE 0 CONDOMINIUMS 35 2.5" EG REMOVE 0 t 36 5.5" M REMOVE 0 37 9 EG REMOVE 0 A -, 1 39 4.5" EG REMOVE 0 38 4.5, EG REMOVE 0 40 5.5' EG REMOVE 0 1 e--[ rE--1 -/ 2 4 - f L -2 -d LI 2 - f U 2 - (3 - 41 5.5" EG REMOVE 0 42 EG REMOVE SKY HOTEL 7 0 1 43 10.5 EG REMOVE 0 44 3" EG REMOVE 0 L - : . 45 11' EG REMOVE 0 46 6. EG REMOVE 0 47 6.5 EG REMOVE 0 .2-K\ . ... 1 -- -- , 1 L., ~ PRIVATE 48 UNKNOWN EG REMOVE ? 709 E. DURANT AVENUE i RESIDENCE 49 15" EG REMOVE $7241.63 ASPEN, CO 81611 11 = it m lk= 1 4 50 5 5' DEC REMOVE 0 ~ ~ u /1* ~..L~@rt-- /Hj kj~ IfE] / 2 Q~~hS \\ \\\ 51 10" DEC REMOVE $3218.50 52 15.5' EG REMOVE $7732.45 53 ' DN â€¢ / i \ \ \ \ % \ EG REMOVE $8239.36 // f I TOTAL VALUE $66,632.93 PROPERTY LNE \ 9//0 --a I I lili NORâ„¢ PROJECT NO: h .3Â» 490 ,/9 BG L SERIES SKY HOTEL dig 21406 DWG FILE ASPEN ALPS CONDOMINIUMS SHEETTITLE TREE MITIGATION PLAN t SCALE: o 8 16 1 ------2 - Lloo PRELIMINARY I.:--.-W~&1.4 U .*EL-.63.-...&am-:&.- NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION DURANT 9 STREET LEGEND V - --- PROPERTY LINE \\\\ rowland+broughton architech./ / u,ban de/gn / intenor design 61\\\\ 234 e hopkins ave 1830 blake st. ste 200 \\\\ 970.544,90060 303.308.1373 0 L r\ \\\\ aspen,co 81611 denver, co 80202 NOTES 970.544 3473 1 303 308.1375 f 1. LAYOUT DIMENSIONS ARE FROM THE BACK OF CURB ~ UNLESS OTHERWISE STATED. 1 1 ' ..PROPERTY Ul~ 2. REFER TO CIVIL DRAWINGS FOR ALL EASEMENTS AND SETBACKS f i _1111.J Consultants - bluegreen 2(5 - 300 s spring st suite 202 1 25/en, co 81611 :43 tu 8 14 L 970.429.7499 0 CHATEAU 970.429,9499 f DUMONT www.bluegreenaspen.com d. #742 1 1 Issue. 4% r 1 07.14.15 F---71 , PLANNED DEVELopME,rr DETAILED REVIEW APPLICATION 12 :" t-Â· 2 18- LI luttl L ~122 L _F 1 1 A \U \\ ) 1 -JI ALLEY 1 1 1 -LIZ i .1 ElI , 233 .=7 1 PROPERTY LINE PLANTER ,-1 7 - 5 U - ~ 494~ - %~i 1 T- 1 [ GLORY HOLE CONDOMINIUMS 4%1 4.1 2- -f ~ t. Â· ~ -EED ,. k 21 -I~/,7 -4 El r' - 4 El 1 - 4 r 1 -, IT -Illk 1 1 2 --LL L ' 1 1 =-3 - 3 U & -f U 9 - f U L, -7 f LI i- FTI -- SKY HOTEL 5 (1 4 + -- lk=El---4L- 21 0 : I L ASPEN, CO 81611 j 709 E. DURANT AVENUE PRIVATE RESIDENCE 0 , I \ "//E'-12'.1.- E 'kI> % \ ~,4 ~ - X 1 < ~basnN1*Ps PARk~NG 1 \<1 ON \ 1 -4 / , \% '5\ \ \ 1 1 \F *1 1 1 W 11 PROPERTY LINE \ / r -- 2 /2 - 0 5 " - -- ~ NORTH P PROJECT NO: <47 21406 DWG FILE â‚¬ 8 BG L SERIES SKY HOTEL.dwg ~/ ASPEN ALPS CONDOMINIUMS / SHEET TITLE - STREET LEVEL LAYOUT PLAN '' SCALE: 0 8 16 / L200 PRELIMINARY NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION .Â£iuc*,1cc-r=nâ€¢.7-1-ru SOUTH SPRINGSTREET DURANT STREET LEGEND &0./0. BENCH INTEGRATED INTO ---- PROPERTY LINE ~[ZI' SITE WALL; LESS â„¢AN 30 rowland+broughton (41 ON STREET PARKING STALLS .~~~.,~. BIKE RACK; MOVABLE PROPOSED ADA RAMp, 022=27 1/4" MINUS EXPOSED archÂ¢tecture / urban design / interior design =221- AGGREGATE CONCRETE 1-=- 4- a V" U PROPOSED ADA UMP SNOWMELT â€¢ 234 e hopkins ave 1 830 blake st Gte 200 RAISED PLANTER; LESS - aspen, co 81611 denver. co 80202 \\4\\\ 970 544.90060 303.308.1373 0 THAN 30" TALL PERVIOUS PAVERS- 970 SU.3473f 303 308 1375 f BOLLARD PROPOSED .'DA 1~1Â·11' 1 -~--- - - -- --~ ~- - PROP~Gl ASPHALT SIGNAGE/BRANDING LESS THAN 30~ TA L 11= L 1 4 34- 1 - GRASS-CRETE RA~) 13; - AREA Consultants LESS THAN 30" TALL AT GRADE PLANTING DED 'r: - bluegreen T 0141- 1 El 4. . 300 s spnng st, suite 202 TRANSITION FFt* ROLL d _ J , 970.429.7499 0 CURBTO VERTICA'* B ~ ,._44,11 - - CHATEAU 970.429.9499 f T a- 81611 DUMONT www.bluegreenaspen.coin ROLL CURD 4 . - 1-2 i X.-21 [ Â· G I III-W.* FLUSH RIBBON CURt] 1 -li 0 -J Issue. 1 GRASS-CRETE AREA ~ 07.14,15 - ROLL CURD ril E -L- -9 j 3 El . = DETAILED REVIEW APPLICATION LANDSCAPE BUFFER 1 - 9--2 - 1 <2 1 1 *%1 - 1 - 1 1 EW; 2 - E Â»-1 (=91 - - - 1 1 .r >. - MECHANICAL AIR INTAKE WITH CURB CUT 1, - 11 i = GRATE /! 1 - 89 1 - DROP OFF PARKING AND /1 IN Â· 111 1 0 1.-1 ilÂ«j VALET SERVICE AREA .I...~-4- 1 =-2 1 1 4 1 3] 1 I Ikul JI 1 PEDESTRIAN WALKWAY P r 4 =0 . L~ PLANÂ·r~n 1 A . 1 -1 11 - Ib PLANTER c 04 li 1 ./.--I 1 1 4 1 r H: 4 1% GLORY HOLE CONDOMINIUMS 1 1. t-1.-6 L 1- ./ p j L 11 4, 1 L -1 -L n A-4 n 4--1 r r[ --==Il - r~7 =-1. 0-7.-.3 L.rt - 3 1_1 M - f L.1 61 - f 1-1 M - f--3 - - ~ - SKY HOTEL 00 4- PROPOSED ADA ILAMr 50 Â· 1 PLANTING DED 1 709 E. DURANT AVENUE 1,3Â» CONTINUATION OF PUBLIC E ASPEN, CO 81611 SIDEWALK TO SECOND E=i- ? - - 11 -- I -=-~~ - - TE-- - - 11 -- r -- P - -Ill_.~ Ii.j/LI- = .- PRIVATE RESIDENCE FLOOR TEREACE/PUBLIC Wpi ....1=2 ACCESS PEDESTRIAN CROSSING ' El 1 PLANTING DED / AL / PROPOSED ADA fuvÂ·ir 1 Ikk [5/ PROPERTY ONIE \ f PROPOSED ADA RAMP - -- m.2 ~ NORTH - PROPOSED CURB CUT PROJECT NO \ \ 00 PLANTING BED 21406 O DWG FILE RAISED -LANTERS; LESS ' ' THAN 30" TALL BG L SERIES SKY HOTEL,dwg i / ASPEN ALPS CONDOMINIUMS ' SHEET TITLE PROPOSED ADA RAMP ; STREET LEVEL / MATERIALS PLAN / : --- - --- ~/ SCALE: 0 8 16 L300 M.5*â„¢C.~C-A=,W.m.li.M 1 1 PRELIMINARY *al#Faliall//6 NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION ..U......*........ 4. PReE=L -p- 8Â·,wÂ¥,e,g--i,oaBo_câ€¢Â£~eLIERIE-*a-, LEGEND SYMBOL ABBR. COMMON NAME BOTANICAL NAME SIZE SPACING SYMBOL ABBR. COMMON NAME BOTANICAL NAME SIZE SPACING TREES PERENNIAL PLANLING AREAS 1/. rowland+broughton Pt QUAKING ASPEN POPULUS TREMULOIDES 16' PER PLAN arcMecture / urban dedgn / interior de. n ' El- Â°v ORANGE YELLOW HUES 2000 sf 18' PER PLAN 234 e hopkins ave 1830 blake st. ste 200 20' PER PLAN ORANGES AND LEMONS GAILLARDIA 'FANFARE BLAZE' #1 GAL. 4 PLANTS / 100sf aspen, co 81611 denver, co 80202 BLANKETFLOWER 970.544.9006 0 303.308.1373 0 0 970.544.3473 f 303.308,1375 f Af AUTUMN BLAZE MAPL_E ACER X FREEMANII AUTUMN 16' PER PLAN MOUNTAIN BASKET OF GOLD ALYSSUM MONTANUM #1 GAL. 4 PLANTS / 100sf BLAZE 18' PER PLAN 'MOUNTAIN GOLD' Y YELLOW HUES 2000 5f e Js SIENNA GLEN MAPLE ACER X FREEMANII SIENNA 14' PER PLAN MOONSHINE YARROW ACHILLEA MOONSHINE #1 GAL. 4 PLANTS / 100sf GLEN #1 GAL, 4 PLANTS / 100sf CUSHION SPURGE EUPHORBIA POLYCHROMA KANNAH CREEK SULPHUR ERIOGONUM UMBELLATUM #1 GAL. 4 PLANTS / 100sf Pt ROCKY MOUNTAIN ACER GRANDIDENTATUM 3" CAL. PER PLAN FLOWER KANNAH CREEK GLOW MAPLE ROCKY MOUNTAIN GLOW 5" CAL. PER PLAN Consultants 0 pac AUTUMN PURPLE ASH FRAXINUS AM ERICANA 3" CAL. PER PLAN ~ GV GROUNDCOVERS & VINES 2000 sf HOP VINE HUMULUS LUPULUS #1 GAL. 4 PLANTS / 100sf AUTUMN PURPLE 5" CAL. PER PLAN NEOMEXICANUS CREEPING SPEEDWELL VERONICA 'WATERPERRY BLUE' #1 GAL. 4 PlANTS / 100sf bluegreen 0 Pac SPRING SNOW CRABAPPLE MALUS 'SPRING SNOW' PER PLAN WOOLLY THYME THYMUS PARECOX #1 GAL. 4 PLATVTS / 1005f ~ 300 s ~Ang ,t. u 3" CAL. 'PSEUDOLANUGINOSUS aspen, co 81611 5" CAL. PER PLAN 970.429.7499 0 970.429.9499 f e www.bluegreenaspen.com PaC NARROWLEAF COTTONWOOD POPULUS ANGUSTIFOLIA 3" CAL. PER PLAN 'CREEKSIDE 5" CAL. PER PLAN NOTE 1. PLANT SPECIES, SIZE, SPACING, AND QUANTITIES ARE SUBJECT TO CHANGE SHRUBS Issue: RaG GREEN MOUND CURRANT RIBES ALPINUM 'GREEN #15 PER PLAN MOUND' 07.14.15 PLANNED DEVELOPMENT FaF TALL FERNLEAF BUCKTHORN FRANGULA ALNUS FINE LINE #15 PER PLAN DETAILED REVIEW APPLICATION CIA ARCTIC FIRE DOGWOOD CORNUS SERICEA ARCTIC #15 PER PLAN FIRE CaB BUD'S YELLOW DOGWOOD CORNUS ALBA 'BUD'S #5 PER PLAN YELLOW' CsM BLOODTWIG DOGWOOD CORNUS SANGUINEA #15 PER PLAN 'MIDWINTER FIRE' GRASSES MIS NARROW LEAF MISCANTHUS SINENSIS #15 PER PLAN MAIDEN GRASS 'SARABANDE S.P BLUESTEM 'PRAIRIE BLUES' PRAIRIE BLUES LITTLE SCHIZACHYRIUM SCOPARIUM #15 PER PLAN O Mc SILKY SPIKE MELIC GRASS MELICA CILIATA #15 PER PLAN 0 DcN VARIEGATED TUFTED HAIR DESCHAMPSIA CESPITOSA 8&8 PER PLAN GRASS 'NORTHERN LIGHTS' PERENNIAL PLANTING AREAS El_ De DEEP BLUE HUES 2000 sf PERENNIAL BACHELOR CENTAUREA MONTANA #1 GAL. 4 PLANTS / 100sf BUTTON TIGER PENSTEMON PENSTEMON MENSARUM #1 GAL. 4 PLANTS / 100sf DWARF BLUE LARKSPUR DELPHINIUM GRANDIFLORUM #1 GAL 4 PLANTS / 100sf SKY HOTEL 'SUMMER NIGHTS' El MB MID BLUE HUES 2000 sf 8LUE FORTUNE HYSSOP AGASTACHE 'BLUE FORTUNE' #1 GAL 4 PLANTS / 100sf DWARF BLUEFLAG IRIS IRIS SETOSA ARTICA #1 GAL. 4 PLANTS / 100sf LITTLE TRUDY CATMINT NEPETA X LITTLE TRUDY #1 GAL. 4 PLANTS / 100sf 709 E. DURANT AVENUE ASPEN, CO 81611 01- BM BLUE-MAGENTA HUES 2000 sf PURPLE GAYFEATHER LIATRIS SPICATA 'FLORISTAN VIOLET #1 GAL. 4 PLANTS / 100sf MAY NIGHT SALVIA SALVIA NEMOROSA 'MAY NIGHT # 1 GAL 4 PLANTS / 100sf PURPLE ROCKCRESS AUBRIETADELTOIDEA # 1 GAL 4 PLANTS / 100sf 'PURPLE GEM' M MAGENTA HUES 2000 sf ECHINACEA PURPUREA 'RUBY AQUILEGIA CAERULEA #1 GAL 4 PLANTS / 100sf STAR' GALLERY PINK LUPINE LUPINUS 'GALLERY PINK' #1 GAL 4 PLANTS / 100sf 0- MR MAGENTA RED HUES 2000 sf ROSE CAMPION LYCHNIS CORONARIA #1 GAL 4 PLANTS / 100sf 'ASTROSANGUINEA' PRAIRIEWINECUPS CALLIRHOE INVOLUCRATA #1 GAL. 4 PLANTS / 100sf PROJECT NO: REDVALERIAN CENTRANTHUS RUBER #1 GAL, 4 PLANTS / 100sf 21406 DWG FILE R RED HUES 2000 sf BG L SERIES SKY HOTEL.dwg MALTESE CROSS LYCHNIS CHALCEDONICA #1 GAG 4 PLANTS / 100sf RED BEE BALM MONARDA 'CAMBRIDGE SCARLET # 1 GAL 4 PLANTS / 100sf SHEETTITLE RED CORAL BELLS HEUCHERA SANGUINEA #1 GAL 4 PLANTS / 100sf PLANTING LEGEND 'SPLENDENS' ~- RO RED ORANGE HUES 2000 sT BUOIBRIHONTBRETIA G20&33111Â£a[U)1115. BRADSHAW' #1 GAL: 4 PLANTA / 10@Â§f CALIFORNIA FUSCHIA ZAUSCHNERIA GARRETTII #1 GAL. 4 PLANTS / 100sf SCALE: ORANGE CARPET r--1 0 ORANGE HUES 2000 sf L400 L...~ ORANGE DAYLILY HEMEROCALLIS FULVA #1 GAL, 4 PLANTS / 100sf GAY BUTTERFLY ASCLEPIS TUBEROSA # 1 GAL. 4 PLANTS / 100sf nÂ¢ --4-4~ml, * *) WTE. TA,20 - #rT M-â„¢ OF â„¢~A~.U~â€¢~~,~tâ„¢ E7L~Â£ A~ WI ORANGE GLOBE MALLOW SPHAERALCEA MUNROANA # 1 GAL 4 PLANTS / 100sf PRELIMINARY 0-:-7"--'.4--1mn" Â¤40~ -1~4 ~~0~r~r~ke Xe~ -k ~f-AUCO-CÂ»I,Amr<On-- NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION 0 0 0 00 DURANT STREET LEGEND -i.*05 SYMBOL DESCRIPTION/NAME TREES rowland+broughton TYP. EVERGREEN OR DECIDUOUS TREE amhnecrum / urban deign / interfordesign ' ' DECIDUOUS TREE PLANTING 234 e hopkins ave 1830 blake st. ste 200 aspen.co 81611 denver, co 80202 970.544.9006 0 303.308,1373 0 970.544.3473f 303 308.1375 f PERENNIAL PLANTING AREAS 1.1~72 47 1 41) C < ~~ HARDY PERENNIAL AREAS PROPER -t- -~---112-- 01 IRUD PLANTING Consultants 1 . NOTE - 1.PLANT SPECIES, SIZE, SPACING, AND QUANTITIES ARE SUBJECT TO CHANGE bluegreen LI 300 s spring st, suite 202 . *FL[12+ | CHATEAU 970.429.9499 f DUMO~ ~ asped co 81611 www.blegreer,aspen.corn 1 %74 1 970.429.7499 0 -J~1 P[RINNIAL PLANTING Issue: 07.14.15 PLANNED DEVELOPMENT DETAILED REVIEW APPLICATION 1 - 1 1 - Pi----% -. El ~ ~ f-Â«. Mi 2 T U u- 1==Cal F _117 1 F 1 -J 1 - i ALLEY 1-9 PROPERTY LINE . 6.- , . ' - Le[1 1-1[A i TI L 1 / i B h - 4 r-1 4 - 1 N -4 - 4 r L It , =,4, 1 1 .1 - P -low 1 -7 f u 1- r--[3 -- r- -1 1 U SKY HOTEL 0 0 9.<1 0 0 1.1,2.-,r - 0 1. 709 E, DURANT AVENUE 1 : 1 -1 ASPEN, CO 81611 -- 7- - 1 4-/r,4.7,/4 ./.T/L- ' \ \ EXISTING ALPS PARKING ~ \ \: \ f[~ -- , /- -C--L- - \ / NL' ~ <7. M PROPERTY LINE \ ..+4 10% . y: j ' 147 f i =m N-f PROJECT NO: a EVERGREEN TREE PLANTING 21406 8 WG FILE: BG L SERIES SKY HOTEL. dwg ASPEN ALPS CONDOMINIUMS SHEET TITLE STREET LEVEL PLANTING PLAN SCALE: 0 8 16 L401 PRELIMINARY =.*=67'----rjff~M== 0-- .-*./.CÂ«Â»ro...Ic...<Illy, --10.-Al .T- Al G,2,1~Â» L~. ~T-0,~ 4, Onâ‚¬A gWE~ *. 1 NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION SOUTH SPRING STREET- I- Mr,-/]rl[~~Dox:â€žVIOC~elld'SE-SKIÂ«Jl.-, glu lal :11.1 ilittl~ LAW OFFICES OF *les POs, KAUFMAN, DISHLER & McALLISTER 315 EAST HYMAN AVENUE, SUITE 305 840)*LE . ~. z U. ' -......- 1,N~FE.E 3 -/V ~PITNEY BOWES ASPEN, COLORADO 81611 E=Ef* 02 1P $ 006.735 iN'21;2'd,Z 0004641121 JUL 16 2015 7012 1010 0003 3457 9409 M~ MAILED FROM ZIPC0DE 81611 Cj-tj of Aspen Communihi Development AHn: Jessica Glarraid 1-4,$1 242'.ual . 130 5. Got ena 9. Aspe-n , 60 9 lo 1 1 210/LU NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING RE: 709 E Durant Ave (Sky Hotel) THE CITY OF AspEN City of Aspen Public Hearing: August 18, 2015, 4:30 PM 130 S. Galena Street, Aspen, CO 81611 p: (970) 920.5000 Meeting Location: City Hall, Sister Cities Room f: (970) 920.5197 130 S. Galena St., Aspen, CO 81611 w: www.aspenpitkin.com Project Location: 709 E Durant Ave (Sky Hotel) Legal Description: PID # 2737182~01, Woodstone Inn Condominiums, according to the Condominium map thereof filed March 11, 1983 in Plat Book 14 at Page 45 through 49,~ lusive at Reception No. 248609 and as further defined and described in the Condominium Declaration for Woodstone Inn Condominiums recorded March 11, 1983 in Book 441 at Page 814 at Reception No. 248608; together with a non-exclusive easement and right-of-way recorded in Book 327 at Page 777; and together with Encroachment License Agreements recorded in Book 316 at Page 232, in Book 425 at Page 907, in Book 425 at Page 913, in Book 425 at Page 919, and in Book 498 at Page 909 Description: The applicant is proposing to redevelop the property with a mixed-use lodge building consisting of lodging, affordable housing, and commercial space. This is the final step in the land use review process. Council review and approval was received on February 9, 2014 by Ordinance 39, Series 2015. and Use ~eviews Requested: Planned Development - Detail Review, Final Commercial Design Review Decision Making Body: Planning and Zoning Commission ~pplicant: Aspen Club Lodge Properties LLC, 110130th Street, NW, Suite 150, Washington, DC 20007 More Information: For further information related to the project, contact Jessica Garrow at the City of Aspen Community Development Department, 130 S. Galena St., Aspen, CO, (970) 429.2780, Jessica.Garrow@cityofaspen.com. GRAND JUNCTION CO 815 .... .....#.4 -â€žm'* --MMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT 31 JUL 201!S PM 1 7- Â·--~71/'~ ~ 130 SOUTH GALENA STREET ..1,0'Me'.-hru ASPEN, CO 81611 5 8 Iâ‚¬- 6 t_ G JZI5 NO STREET L009615(0008/12/15 iR DELIVERY R EXPIRED DRESSED A i 6000, . - 19/ 9- 8 541134 - 3 1 - 443 8 2â€¢ 51 Â·4 1 Â·1 4 '1.11 175i~1 ' Â· J '4 81612@4450 Â£r<TrirliC<Irk,&<Ii,flifir{Yjailibltfil"Ia,Â¥Â¥10'tle)%#butlfli '' 8i6 i2S4450 . i .4 4 .A .0, L V 414Â«,,**,â€žâ€žâ€ž00 GRAND JUNCTION CO 815 '0-- -'ll....--.**Ii-~...â€ž- -..# COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT 130 SOUTH GALENA STREET -----------2-~ ASPEN, CO 81611 31 JUL 2015 PM 1 T .0.ZE>%,ki.-4-*... ~ KELLER KURT E PO BOX 840 N I XI E 802 73 1009 0008/11/15 ASPEN, CO 816 RETURN TO SENDER ATTEMPTED - NOT KNOWN UNABLE TO FORWARD BE: 081611190230 *1979-02207-31- 40 0 $& Da@Ea,Â®2 1211!ilial#'ll/1/11111'2111/,Illilip,11111'11!lilw,11111111'ail!, 1 -- -/ 1 9 GRAND JUNCTION CO 815 COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT 130 SOUTH GALENA STREET 31 JUL 2015 PM 1 T .â€¢p#-4 ASPEN, CO 81611 ----I â€ž--'.-L /~ A A . ASPEN TOWNHOMES EAST COMMON AREA 835 E DURANT AVE NIXT E 802 7E 1009 8008/11/15 1 ASPEN, CO 81611 RETURN TO SENDER ATTEMPTED - NOT KNOWN UNABLE TO FORWARD BC: 81533399230 1 Â·1 97 9- 83 2 00-3 1 -40 I A:644*9% 40 2 1,1*j,/1,/,11/1/jiÂ·,#4,2,/112/111*,lil~"tillit~~/1~1(~ijl"*1~'1(j I -- __ - 4 -r--C ---9--r - - - - GRAND JUNCTION CO 815 ..........2. -/*/. I'~~~~~~~I...... COMM' INITv DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT .... 230 SOUTH GALENA STREET ...0#*%*.==*.#Filliviallili 31 li JI.PO'1.5 P M 1| ..0- **4-mt- ...t//////U'J///C/PU///u/~7/~~~~ ASPEN, CO 81611 ~fff LE CLAIRVAUX COMMON AREA NIXIE 802 7E 1009 0008/11/15 ATTEMPTED - NOT. KNOWN ASPEN. CO 8161 UNABLE TO FORWARD :1- 1974-82878-31-2ta ~ ~ B r': B 'i El 1 1 9 07 -8 8 "illifil,1111*#letrhhpiter'llicti"li,11%1Â£/ilit,11111,1,",1 -- GRAND JUNCTION CO 81.5 .,4, COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT - ..â€ž-I. 31 131 2015 P M 1 1 /-'-""4 130 SOUTH GALENA STREET ASPEN, CO 81611 11 f . 1, \ i GLORY HOLE CONDO ASSOC COMMON AREA NIXIE 802 7 E 1809 0088/11/15 525 S ORIGINAL ST RETURN TO SENDER ASPEN, CO 81611 ATTEMPTED - NOT KNOWN UNABLE TO FORWARD Brk Â£1513390732 *3979-27347-3-1-248 84*%1*91-?22 /1/'1/,11//11/li,/,11'11/1,/11/1/1111/1/111,1/1'11'/'11111/1111/1 GRAND JL.iii\iICTION CO 81.5 Â·Â·*'-'~NO-'-*~'0-'-* COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT ./-4- 3 -1 14..AL 201 5 PM 1 L. 130 SOUTH GALENA STREET ./ ASPEN, CO 81611 ,/4/43' -~~<&4 ~~~ 4.4 ROBINSON STEPH NT XIE 802 78 1009 0008/11/15 3 107 ASPEN MOUNG RETURN TO SENDER ASPEN, CO 81611 ATTEMPTED - NOT KNOWN UNABLE TO FORWARD BC.: 816113982-Rf, Â·7979-076â„¢.R-3-1-48 #116â‚¬111**h 99 2 11| /ill/11,11 !.1 ill /1 : 11* 1% Illi'll,tilit' litill i'lkilit.112'114:.Il GRAND JUNCTIuiv COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT 130 SOUTH GALENA STREET - 31 JUL 2015 PM 1 -I- 4**-*44 ASPEN, CO 81611 ~ -~~I>~ BARBATA LAURA ANDERSON 1/3 1600 TEXAS ST * FORT WORTH, T NIXIE 750 7E 1 0008/07/15 RETURN TO SENDER A .7- 9- r u n -rÂ· cÂ· râ€¢~ 50 r..r ), ru m.. 5 1 U. M r- Z L W - 3, W 1 1 9 ,Â¥ H Ou'll UNABLE TO FORWARD -- 76i02S3478 OL. 0101.41.e,2 2 -- 121; W -84*2 4 4 - 1 1- 040 1.ii'i-j.-i,illi.,%.1.tiIIUL.11 .1,111. 1 1 81611@1902 : ' 44,111':'Irt'*'*i'in,01':11,ili,ii,IA'lli,ils,11111,11 , COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT GRAND JUNCTION CO 815 - - 130 SOUTH GALENA STREET <-14*12 i.6//6,. 31 JUL 201!3 PM 1 T Â·123%~ ~~_-Â¢4 - ASPEN, CO 81611 S & S REALTY NIXIE 100 SE 1009 0008/06/15 230 PARK AVE RETURN TO SENDER NEW YORK, NN NOT DELIVERABLE AS ADDRESSED UNABLE TO FORWARD 8 C: 81611190230 *1979-04069-31-40 8 28?..24*tfA l|jii||i|ililillill|il|lliiiliilijill|iiti~|i'111111111111111111# i GRAND JUNCTION CO 8.1.:5 I.-*442*+ b......, COMMuNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT 130 SOUTH GALENA STREET 31 -ll J 1 2(31 5 PM 1. I SeÂ»-01~ ASPEN, CO 81611 ~~) BLOOMFIELD HI NEUMANN MICHAEL 7381 MOHASNIC DR NIXIE 482 5 C 1009 0008/10/15 1 RETuRN TO SENDER 11 NOT DELIVERABLE AS ADDRESSED V UNABLE TO FORWARD SC: 81611190230 *1979-02628-31-40 48:jol,1,1.NA~6.2 1t11:l1l111iil'l'1III1IIIII:1111111||111i,|11|1,11,|1,11||1,11111 NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING RE: 709 E Durant Ave (Sky Hotel) THE CITY OF ASPEN Public Hearing: August 18, 2015, 4:30 PM City of Aspen 130 S. Galena Street, Aspen, CO 81611 p: (970) 920.5000 Meeting Location: City Hall, Sister Cities Room f: (970) 920.5197 130 S. Galena St., Aspen, CO 81611 w: www.aspenpitkin.com Project Location: 709 E Durant Ave (Sky Hotel) Legal Description: ~ 273718280001, Woodstone Inn Condominiums, according to the Cmtdominium Map thereof filed March 11, 1983 in Plat Book l~age ~rough 49, inclusive at Reception No. 248609 and as furthe~ined and described in the Condominium Declaration for Woodstone Inn Condominiums recorded March 11, 1983 in Book 441 at Page 814 at Reception No. 248608; together with a non-exclusive easement and right-of-way recorded in Book 327 at Page 777; and together with Encroachment License Agreements recorded in Book 316 at Page 232, in Book 425 at Page 907, in Book 425 at Page 913, in Book 425 at Page 919, and in Book 498 at Page 909 Description: The applicant is proposing to redevelop the property with a mixed-use lodge building consisting of lodging, affordable housing, and commercial space. This is the final step in the land use review process. Council review and approval was received on February 9, 2014 by Ordinance 39, Series 2015. Land Use Reviews Requested: Planned Development - Detail Review, Final Commercial Design Review Decision Making Body: Planning and Zoning Commission Applicant: Aspen Club Lodge Properties LLC, 1101 30th Street, NW, Suite 150, Washington, DC 20007 More Information: For further information related to the project, contact Jessica Garrow at the City of Aspen Community Development Department, 130 S. Galena St., Aspen, CO, (970) 429.2780, Jessica.Garrow@cityofaspen.com. 41.'ll':"' I i COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT GRAND JUNCTION CO 8.15 Â·Â·'*'00="*~-*-- --~-----=-J 130 SOUTH GALENA STREET 31 -".7Â¥ 707 5 PM 1 1 ,4-0/*-eÂ·-'-- 1-0.04 ASPEN, CO 81611 CHERAMIE ALAN A 1/22 INT 139 CHERAMIE LN GOLDEN ME, N I XI E 708 5E 1009 0008/05/15 RETURN TO SENDER NO SUCH NUMSEM UNAZLE TO FORWARD SC: 81611190230 *1979-03694-31-40 8*61*1*172 1il1'l111llil11l1i1111,,1111,i1lll,11l,ll1llllllll11l1ll;1l1}1,1! ~------------------- LEGEND --.- SYMBOL DESCRIPTION/NAME TREES I rowland+broughton TYP. DECIDUOUS TREE architecture T urban design Anterior deman -244- 0 234 e hopkins ave 1830 blake st, ste 200 970.544.90060 303.308.1373 0 aspen, co 81611 dernier, co 80202 m -r I PERENNIAL PLANTING AREAS 970.544.3473f 303.308 1375 f LF- -74-UE[T- 83 1 1 PERENNIAL AREAS / 11 .'11 1 i - - Consultants - Y Il .vil I POOL LOUNGE N Il 1 SHALLOW SEDUM TRAY '94# 1 1 F 1 I 1. PLANT SPECIES, SIZE, SPACING, AND QUANTTTIES ARE SUBJECT TO CHANGE bluegreen I 300 s spring st, suite 202 aspen, co 81611 11 970.429.7499 0 970.429.9499 f www.bluegreenaspel.com 1-1 7- -1 1 H20 -1 07,14,15 Issue: 1 0 PLANNED DEVELOPMENT DETAILED REVIEW APPUCATION 1. /1 1 -------1. lilli 22= MIDDLE | ~ Iff L--11 1Â£--11 LEVEL 1 - =1-1 1 A-11 11 'Ir~.--/. 11 .- --- L - 1 -1 4-Â»1- E M . / 4 7 1 F o / r -- :11 (1 ( 1) 11 SPA LOUNGE OWNERS. Ir---Il K_>-' C i BAR/LOUNGE - Fl 120 SF LOUNGE H20 1 - F U r==L--1 1(7 h UPPER LEVEL | 1 0- 94 SF 1 40(1 1_ H20 1 - .1 --- - -- . Lt.[~11 1 1// -- . - - --4 1 -2 2 - 02~ Ill - ~~.1 11 41 1 -- 1 11,P- : '' - --------- - SKY HOTEL 1 1 / / 709 E DURANT AVENUE ~ ASPEN, CO 81611 / LOWER . - ft LEVEL - mh= 1 ROOF TERRACE 1-1 T J T. r - pu==ral L : 00 ~ NORTH PROJECT NO: NVERSATTD E-- 21406 DWG FILEÂ· ~ LOUNGE -1 BG L SERIES SKY HOTEL.dwg SHEET TI- / ROOFLEVEL PLANTING PLAN / SCALE: o 8 16 L401-R nE -0-Tnâ€¢, -ae-,1 *.Â»râ„¢Â»eu - VT I SECOND FLOOR TERRACE PRELIMINARY n, .~.~r, oc â€¢,0,â€¢Aâ€ž~1+mJ-mjâ€¢. AMoNÂ·r râ„¢.r,IM~~,ae. ==W-7-t==&'== -M CD- ~A~ ~TATUTC~f A~ DTHE~1 -~L~~D ~D{Ta i NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION -U-/C'll.I' ./-/.I 6%,-~ ~81[Â¥1Â«~,3-*Ullf~r=~80_0Â£~GLKEI~B*Yâ€ž]la_* DURANT r.- STREET LEGEND ADA RAMP] -- PROPERTY LINE rowland+broughton BVWDTH MIN: archnectum/urban design /inte#or des,1 MAX 2% CROSS-SLOPE 234 e hopkins ave 1830 blake st, ste 200 /1121 U ON ALL aspen,co 81611 denver, co 80202 1 970.544.90060 303.308.1373 0 '9ULB-OUT ~ NOTES 970.544.34731 303.308.1375f 1-1 \ 1-10-1 \ 1. LAYOUT DIMENSIONS ARE FROM THE BACK OF CURB , UNLESS OTHERWISE STATED. 2. REFER TO CIVIL DRAWINGS FOR ALL EASEMENTS /P-;1=-1 - - ~t~ I-~ --- 71- -P~9PERTY U ~- AND SETBACKS ~ f ~ tt - .p PA)NG BOLLARDS UGHT-~N - - Consultants 1 |BIKE RACKS I 1 J - m PEDESTRIAN-FRIENDLY ALLEY bluegreen - DESIGN PEDESTRIAN-SCALED - -~1 300 s spring st, suite 202 |L |ADA RAMP~ ~>~222\" j - -1 T>GUL/ CHATEAU aspen, co 81611 970.429.7499 0 rl M *Mi~-4- DUMONT www.bluegreenasper[.com 1 ~4 ~ 970 IM 9499 1 -- 64 8' WIDTH MIN. 1 P'=rn MAX 2% CROSS- , -* 1 ~ SLOPE ON ALL , 1 U i 4,- im, > -1 1 1 Issue: 8' WIDTH MINI E--4 07.14.15 1- ~ MAX 2% CROSS- E--1.0, 1 PLANNED DEVELOPMENT SLOPE ON ALL -1,14 . DETAILED REVIEW APPLICATION t'/ 120 1 9 5 1.- .1 4, i 0 -1[J 2 14-, rnÂ· : .r- . t-L 4191 2-- -- -2 211 --1-- -- -1 U 1 1 .1---_Ill ALLEY , ~BOLLARDSI 1, 1 1 #-5 lIN 1 ) 1/--- Â» - 1 1- J=P -7 1 1=Â«E[ ll#~=4912-41111Â«---2 - ---p:73- - - ---LiMJ 1-ill GLORY HOLE - 2-h i //3 CONDOMINIUMS 1 r- 4 r.1 4 - La.>L 4 r 4 9 IT 1- =1- 1 V.0- L L 1 1 1/7Â» , E L j JUrn,- f L_I 1 f L.~~~*7-07 LI 1 - f L 1 - rn --r ~ 357 LF t SKY HOTEL \\4 1 A# 1 1!Â¢21 8' WIDTH MINI 1 127 Â¢ - 268 LF 1 - MAX 2% CROSS- /Â»h SLOPE ON ALL ..9' UP 1 ' r_--= I ASPEN, CO 81611 709 E. DURANT AVENUE r ~ ~- 11 - - 11 -- . .Ii. I -i I"LILJ.I IUL- PRIVATE RESIDENCE 5' WIDTH MINI DN MAX 2% CROSS- SLOPE ' _~p 4-d- 140 PRbpERTY LINE \ 1 8' VWDTH MIN. ~ ' r- -1 MAX 2% CROSS- -- --- SLOPE ON ALL . --- f - 1 NORTH -- 9, r ENHANCED PED i < W , ADA RAMP = . 4 0 ' PROJECT NO: 21406 ACCESS POINT DWG FILE: \ TYPICAL X. BG L SERIES SKY HOTEEL.dwg \ 1 ASPEN ALPS CONDOMINIUMS SHEET TITLE STREET LEVEL TDM/MMLOS LAYOUT PLAN SITE PLAN i . Vy / |ADA RAMP| |BIKE RACKS F~ \ - SCALE: o 8 16 Ef L200 K % - / i / . / , 1 nE -g# m- .WW-- n- oux- I PRELIMINARY Â£,t-/ - %, r.-.- --lucc-Tâ€žOUT n, 1-*I 4% 1 i 1 /~ ~ NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION ELEVATION ELEVATION OF ATION OF MOST ROOF HEIGHT OVER ACTUAL ROOF HEIGHT RVEYOR LABEL FINISHED GRADE ATURAL GRADE RESTRICTIVE TOPOGRAPHY OVER MOST RESTRICTIVE RIFICATION 1 7942-7 7942' - 4 PROPOSED 7981' - 0 38 - 10" rE 2 7941Â·-9 7942-1 PROPOSED 7981'-7 39-10 3 7941Â· -7 7942.1 PROPOSED 7981'-0 39' - 5" 4 7941' -6 7942'-1 PROPOSED 7981./ 39' - 6" - / ' 5 7938 11 7939'-10" PROPOSED 7978Â· - r 39Â·- 8 ------------1 --- 6 7938' - 9" 7938-8 NATURAL 7978Â· -7- 39'-11" 7 7937' - 9" 7937Â· - 10- PROPOSED 7977' - 0" 39' - 5" ''' I'll 8 7937' - 11" 7939Â· - 5 PROPOSED 7971' - 5 33' - 6" rowland+broughton I , 9 - 7939' - 10" NATURAL 7978' - T 38'-9 a~ctutecture / urban design l irtenor des,gn . - 1//1 4 k I , ,--,-, fÂ« 1 10 7938'-3 7940- 0" PROPOSED 7978' + 7 39'-11 234 e hopkins ave 1830 blake st ste 200 - I . --1gy , 11 7942.0" 7942' - 21/4'Â· PROPOSED 7981'-11" 39'-11" aspen' co 81611 denver, co 80202 970 544 9006 0 303 3081373 0 12 7943' - 0 7942' - 10 NATURAL 7973'- 5" 30' - 5" , 970 544 3473 f 303 308 1375 f 13 7941' - 10 7943Â·-1 PROPOSED 7976-2 34 4 - 1 - _1-1 ---- 14 7941' - 5 7943' - 4' PROPOSED 7974' - 5 33'- 0 - =-1- 7/1 15 32-7 - -, 17 7940'-10 7943Â· - 11 PROPOSED 7976Â· - T' 35' - 9" 937 , - ---- ~ 794{r- 10' 7943' - T PROPOSED 7973-5 - 84-1 NATURAL 7971' - 10Â·Â· 27Â·- 8 __ 16 , 1,1 4 df , 18 7944-4 PROPOSED 7974Â· - 5 32Â· - 4 19 7946'-11 7945-6 NATURAL 7976Â·- T' 31'- 1 - I r--------7 -nr - -- . -* I~ 1 HEIGHTCALCULATION NOTES: , 20 7947'-0 7945' - 3 NATURAL 7973'-5 28' - 2" - F 21 7946 10Â» 7945'-1" NATURAL 7974' - 4" 29' - 3" Consulbit --- -- 22 7947-0 7944' - 11" NATURAL 7976- 2 31'-3 -1. NATURAL GRADE IS INTERPOLATED GRADE PER'- / I | /1 CIVIUSURVEY DOCUMENTS .'' 5/17 23 7947-0 7944' - 4" NATURAL 7973Â· -5 29'- 1 0 _ 1 4/' | 2. DORMERS MEET EXCLUSION 26.575.020.F.2.g, 24 7943'-9 NATURAL 7981' - T 37' - 10 Z'/17 1: 1--19- LESS THAN 50% OF ROOF ,/ 37' - 10 25 7946'-10 7944' - 1 NATURAL 7981'-11" '44 -2Â·/17 3. CHIMNEYS, FLUES, & VENTS ALL MEET EXCLUSION 26 7946 - 10 7943'-11 NATURAL 7983-9 39'-10 -------- ~'41 I 26.575.F.4.c ,/ 29 - 7943Â·-10 NATURAL 7983' - 9 39'-11" -- 26.575.F.4.a 27 - 7943-5 NATURAL 7981 -10 38- 5 // r 11 - 1- - - - 7-4*- 11 - 4, ELEVATOR ENCLOSURE MEETS EXCLUSION 28 7943' - 4" NATURAL 7982-0 38Â· - 8'Â· 9 I - ~-- ~ 5, ROOFTOP RAILINGS MEET EXCLUSION 26.575.F.4.d ,-, ' 30 - 7943-11 NATURAL 7981Â·-10' 38'-11 TAR - f 6. MECH EQUIP MEET EXCLUSIONS 26.575.F.4.e /' 31 - 7942 - 10 NATURAL 7982 - 3 39 5 7. TRELLIS, ROOFTOP AMENITIES (BAR, BUILT.INS,-,- ' 32 - 7939' - 6 NATURAL 7978 - 7 39' - 1" | | .BBQ, FIREPITS, POOL, SPAS MEET EXCLUSIONS/ 33 - 7942' - 0 NATURAL 7981 - T 39' - T --,/ 26.575.F.4.k 34 - 7943' -6 NATURAL 7971--10 28'- 4" 1 -' ~~- 088 , - CHATEAU . ~- CHATEAU ,/0 , c~ â‚¬2 ~ 1,- '196. , - 1 ./, / /' 11 , 1 DUMONT ,/ CHAUMONT /0 , (3 - STORY;,-' (3 - STORY),/ W %12,/''ll I . .00 <>1 / /11 > 111.4 - 2-/17 Â· ~ 7/12" --%' 1 11 -' == =1 9 , 0 - , - , 1/, '' , 1 POOL LOUNGE | I DECKAREA '' I , - -7942 -- - - -- - / .. 1 1 #5'Â·/17 -*LU 1 -) C===, 1 ./. , 1 1 //7 ~ allr L=4 1 a â€¢ I - - , I POOL. r Â¥ ALLâ‚¬Y ' t|I 1 1 ':4~~ ~ 04 -- MECH & KITCHEN EXHAUST /-,19 CHIMNEY ENCLOSURE , PROPERTY * ., ,-'' 3/ *. ----- ---------I---- ------- -------- ----------- , X US ELEV, - 1 0, ----- __1 61/ | 7~ - ~~~ 6,/ 4 -:- -11"1 - "111 1 1-ft C I i Ii *'17 3"/17 bill 1 - ' 1 EUN 11 6,1'lili_---r- 1 STAIRâ‚¬ 4 EQUIP I t|'11 - -+El-41.-- ---FP FLUE | -,/''GLORY HOLE |1 , 1 1, 7 1 17 / CONDOMINIUMS , 1 11 BENC IROOF 1- - ~ ~ 775=190' 1 (3- STORY) i ab. 1 SEE ,X 1 CABANAS 11 N i If i CHANGIN E - (MOV -8Â·H) ROOMS . + --V& - - THE LITTLE i j i (MOVABLE 'H) 77771 5 -ET'% 1 i ,-./7 1 1 NELL HOTEL â€ž LOUNGE DECK (4 -STORY) W TRELUS ABOVE E BENCH 1 -iqI. .2.27 - --ff- F -/ MT SKY HOTEL GENIE TOR--- i-~7 1 1 | A 19, 4.'., ' Â® SPA 51-~ i : DECKAREA E T 7,17 - -- 1 1 1 1 1*filljlll---_1 1 - ' I tl-i-1~. .~# ra-r_~. t tirJ- 7 1 17 - GUAR IL 1 19 1 HI22I4Â· 3 1 1 Â£ I ,/RESIDENCE I J ASPEN, CO 81611 ..PRIGATE | 709 E DURANT AVE. 4"/17 3"/1 -1113.- -SIAT- -- L --,-'' (2-STORY) -,1 4 L / 1/ 1 --,1 I)' 9 FOR WORE . .A- , ./ 1 / \\ / \ \ #1 <* ; 1-'.,190- -:14---=1Â»- -71- 1 -<--Ij 12) / ---------------I----------72-- ----------------- /- - 1.1 SEE 2 , -- < ~RMATI < , ' -'' ALPS ACCESS/DRIVEWAY / 3 6 I. /, ,- -- -1- -7 93 44\ ...4 -, I PROJECT NO - I , 0 0 - 10 2140660 N '- - 404 -' r... 9 .4/ , ' / ASPEN ALPS .%- BUILDING Â» / 304 4 / ,-'' (2-STORY) SHEET TITLE I , ---J , '' LEGEND --- HEIGHT OVER .Â»k r - I ,- - FINISHED GRADE TOPOGRAPHY 0 - , I , - 0 ------- NATURAL GRADE SCALE: 1 /16" = 1'-0" - , I I - f / / PLAN TRUE NORTH NORTH P - - 29-55,~NE---Â»~OUGH'06*0â€¢~ET~Eâ€¢.AB~-DE,~IN f Z1.1 - 89 ~ce'.c*lo~â€ž~.*E#Tâ‚¬â€žANCâ€ž~ECT-Eâ€¢~Um#.3~N 4 ( 1 j Zl.1 -HEIGHT OVER TOPOGRAPHY PLAN ~- 412/ SCALE 1 /16"=1'-0- *4-.T.E.Er 1 1 111 \\ 11 000F~linci SOUTH SPRING STREET MOPER. 7942 -7946 LODGE D BASEMENT Ll 78% LEVEL 1 SUB GRADE BASEMENT WALL EXPOSURE SF CALCULATIONS r. Â® % Â® 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 r 11 11 1 i 4 i1~ r1 1 1380 SF (1335 NET) --~ FACTOR 9312 SF LODGE 0 SF NET Li\/ABLE 0 SF RESIDENCES 0 SF NET LIVABLE UNIT SPACE (L) vki Alm- 44/ ill'r. OSF OSF RESIDENCES SF NET LIVABI 13,323 SF 17,080 SF LODGE 11,168 SF NET LIVABLE 120 SF COMMERCIAL 100 SF NET LEASABLE 301 SF 386 SF COMMERCIAL 344 SF NET LEASABLE 1 771'.'14.'~'~5--/ OSF AHU OSF NET LIVABLE 1,463 SF 1,876 SF AHU 1.714 SF NET LIVABLE + 24 221 SF NON-UNIT SPACE (L/g/AHI 303 SF +5168 SF + 6 625 SF NON-UNIT SPACF (1 /C/AH 1 33.653 SF TOTAL AREA 20 255 SF 25,967 SF TOTAL AREA rowland+broughton UNIT SPACE (L) LODGE r#/hkett PER SUBGRADE CALCULATIONS 78% EXPOSURE LEVEL 1 296 SF LEVEL 1 0 SF 9312 SF 1588 SF (1454 NET) UNIT SPACE (L) BELOW GRADE TOTAL 3,039 SF BELOWGRADE TOTAL 1,057 SF 234 e hopkins ave 1830 blake st ste 200 archttecture a u/an deign 4/enor design PER SUBGRADE CALCULATIONS = 789 SF FLOOR AREA = 20 255 FLOOR AREA BASEMENT 2743 SF BASEMENT 1,057 SF (BASEMENTCOUNTEDAS 2-STORYSPACE) aspen co 81611 denve~ co 80202 LODGE 89 SF , 1767 SF(1614 NET) - 970 544006 0 303 308 1373 0 /2\ SPRING STREET (WEST ELEVATION) /02\ SOUTHWEST DIAGONAL 970 544 3473 f 303 308 1375 f 49 497 LODGE 1 u././/1 %////////////////////12 2051 SF NON-UNIT (UC/AH) UNITSPACE(L)__....Â·-Â«21 'PSI (1941 NET) - 1 *.7 1 5082 SF A.H.U. 920%%%3 1%%%%%%%%%%%%*%%%*21 2788 SF 15*-I.=2 f:-4 1876 SF (1714 NET) LEVEL 1 159 SF LEVEL 1 Â· 1,093 SF -\14-WilillY/yffil/*llAU im#, BASEMENT 689 SF BASEMENT 2,382 SF COMM 120 SF(120 SF NET,11 1 BELOW GRADE TOTAL 848 SF BELOW GRADE TOTAL 3,475 SF Consultants ' ' NON UNIT Â· -UL42;8&2,422#222244aUL-1 LELÂ· 8 LODGE ~ SOUTHEAST DIAGONAL ~ ASPEN ALPS ACCESS (SOUTH ELEVATION) PARKING ~~ ~ ~ .. --~~t)EN / / (D (LJC/AH) 865 SF (814 NET) 6625 SF UNIT SPACE (L) 19139 SF , I-lip. 221 SF ~777777-7-~ . LODGE [2%%%%*51 V i / / / 1 h .; / i l ' / l,i ' l l / / /h i ll : / i l / / / / l l 1 / 4 O 1 70 \\Â«\---- 4428 SF LEVEL 1 368 SF LEVEL 1 OSF (4010 NET) BASEMENT 945 SF BASEMENT 2.446 SF UNIT SPACE (L) / 8EL0W GRADE TOTAL 1,313 SF BELOW GRADE TOTAL 2,446 SF -/ 1600 SF COMM Â© 386 SF (344 NET) ~ ORIGINAL STREET (EAST ELEVATION) ~ /'~\ ALLEY (NORTH ELEVATION) rih PROPOSED BASEMENT LEVEL FLOOR AREA CALCULATION r-Fh PROPOSED LEVEL ONE FLOOR AREA CALCULATION 1-r-~- Issue ezz' C /005 1 1 40 0 4 ./0 K 1 1 = C. 079 te@%8%%%%%%%%% 07.14 2015 DETAILED U REVIEW NON-UNIT (UC/AH) LEVEL 1 OSF LEVEL 1 110 SF APPLICATION BASEMENT 236 SF BASEMENT 1 537 SF 2212 LODGE BELOW GRADE TOTAL 236 SF BELOW GRADE TOTAL 1 647 SF 443 SF (405 NET) LODGE Â® ALLEY (SOUTH ELEV) ~ ALLEY (SOUTH ELEV) LEVEL 2 LODGE LEVEL 3 1346 SF (1214 NET) 17630 SF LODGE 13,568 SF NET LIVABLE 1368 SF (1248 NEU- Â« 24,000 SF LODGE 18,836 SF NET LIVABLE 3] 3,073 SF COMMERCIAL 2 903 SF NET LEASABLE 'j 1 1 OSF COMMERCIAL SF NET LEASABLE OSF RESIDENCES SF NET LIVABLE NON-UNIT (UC/AH) OSF RESIDENCES SF NET LIVABLE t UNIT SPACE (L) fae<Els..51--4- OSF AHU SF NET LIVABLE OSF AHU SF NET LlVABLE + 3 092 SF NON-UNIT SPACE (Ug/A#Â·9 2212 +794 SF NONUNIT SPACE (L/C/AHI 1324 SF 92'39'.Vijiii 23.795 SF TOTAL AREA 24794 SF TOTAL AREA '41 F///////////////////0 - LODGE LEVEL 1 OSF 3457 SF (3200 NET) BASEMENT 1,062 SF LODGE BELOWGRADE TOTAL 1,062 SF 2645 SF (2442 NET) LODGE " H j N1 COMM. LODGE ~ DURANT AVE. (NORTH ELEV.) 1311 SF(1262 NET) 207&.SE(1933 NET) 2082SFC1*DNE:\ '/li//ll?iN?////3 LODGE UNIT SPACE (L) ~~ 3026SE (2793 NET) 368/SE F --- - TOTAL WALL AREA ABOVE GRADE % ABOVE GRADE LODGE UNIT LEVEL 1 2,243 SF 1 947 SF 8756 A NON-UNIT (UC/AH) NON-UNIT (UC/AH) . BASEMENT 2 743 SF 0 SF 0% 2174 SF NIA 270 SF 298 SF 0- Â·Â·-- - LEVEL 1 0 SF OSF (2000 NET) B NON-UNIT (1-/C/AH) F:h / 1, -x- ~ BASEMENT 1,282 SF 225 SF 18% 2618 SF LODGE -// i//j//~~rji//ll// NON-UNIT (L/C/AH) LEVEL 1 574 SF 415 SF 72% C - ~~~4**49%3~ 832_SE (786 NET) 1435SE 259 SF BASEMENT 689 SF OSF 0% LEVEL 1 1,985 SF 892 SF 45% 1-kI.kEXÂ»" ' LODGE (1334 NET) , r/ltll 1 ' It 1,11}11 1.11 BASEMENT 2,382 SF OSF 0% D UNITSPACE(L) _.._ fflititit 118 SF 2047 SF BASEMENT 945 SF OSF 0. 111 ,~--~214- ..1,Â»,jf.~ UNITSPACE (L) .24~f//- LODGE UNIT LEVEL 1 787 SF 419 SF 53% 840 SF (786 NET) E 111119 11 (2000 NET) LEVEL 1 2,040 SF 2.040 SF 100% F BASEMENT 2,446 SF 0% 0% 1490 SF LODGE LEVEL 1 OSF OSF N/A 1762 SF(1641 NET) /~ 2167 SF (1979 NET) LODGE UNIT BASEMENT 235 SF 0 SF 0% - - - Â·-n G LODGE - 2175 SF LEVEL 1 1.130 SF 1,020 SF 90% - H TERRACE ,-,--Â·'~ v,~/ 3927 SF LODGE (2000 NET) BASEMENT 1,537 SF OSF 0% LEVEL 1 724 SF 724 SF 100% SKY HOTEL (3607 NET) 2972 SF (2737 NET) 1790 SF BASEMENT 1062 IF 0 SF 0% 0/0 ABOVE GRADE AVERAGES rih PROPOSED LEVEL TWO FLOOR AREA CALCULATION rih PROPOSED LEVEL THREE FLOOR AREA CALCULATION LEVEL 1 - 9,483 SF TOTAL WALL AREA - 78% EXPOSED 1 =40 0 BASEMENT - 13,097 SF TOTAL WALL AREA - 2 38% EXPOSED 709 E DURANT AVE SUBGRADE AREA CALCULATIONS ASPEN, CO 81611 LEVEL 1 25,967 * ( 78) = 20,254 SF TO COUNT TO FLOOR AREA BASEMENT: 33,653 - 500 = 33,153 SF BASEMENT * ( 0238) = 789 SF TO COUNT TO FLOOR AREA LODGE UNIT LEVEL 4 ROOF PLAN 1848 SF 0 SF LODGE (PER SECTION 26 575 020 D 7 GARAGES & CARPORTS, MIXED USE PROJECTS WITH RESIDENTIAL - 13,650 SF LODGE 12,937 SF NET LIVABLE (1767 NET) ------ osF COMMERCIAL 0 SF NET LEASABLE 0 SF COMMERCIAL 133 SF NET LEASABLE UNITS. 250 SF OF GARAGE PER RESIDENCE IS EXCLUDED FROM FLOOR AREA CALCULATIONS OSF RESIDENCES 0 SF NET LIVABLE 0 SF RESIDENCES OSF AHU 0 SF NET LIVABLE 0 SF AHU PROJECT HAS (2) AH UNITS/RESIDENTIAL THUS 500 SF EXCLUDED. THEN PER SECTION +3121 SF NON-UNIT SPACE (L/C/AHZ +oSF NON-UNIT SPACE 26.575.020.0.8, SUB-GRADE GARAGES, THE GARAGE EXEMPTION IS TAKEN FROM THE TOTAL 16,771 SF TOTAL AREA ~--- t~ -EFF TOTAL AREA GROSS BELOW-GRADE AREA PRIOR TO CALCULATING THE SUBGRADE EXEMPTION. 500 SF EXEMPT TAKEN FROM THE TOTAL SUB-GRADE GROSS SF) LODGE UNIT i TERRACE 2156 SF LODGE UNIT 7900 SF (2058 NET) /t 2044 SF (2023 NET) ELEVATOR- PROJECT NO EXEMPT 21406.60 LODGE UNIT FROM FAR ON 2239 SF (2070 NET) TOP FLOOR NON-UNIT (UC/AH) 22UE COMM TERRACE 3 065 SF LODGE UNIT - - LL- 0 SF PROPOSED FLOOR SHEET TITLE Ir LODGE UNIT 133 SF (NED [L K Â¥ 1965 9 AREA CALCULATIONS 11~~| SCALE: As indicated 1764 SF (1856 NET) - 1 (1629 NET) 1--J ~ LODGE UNIT ~*- *-- 9-- NON-UNIT (UC/AH) 1626 SF 56 SF PDO.5 (1534 NET) . 1 -.40 J' PZ< rih PROPOSED LEVEL FOUR FLOOR AREA CALCULATION ~ PROPOSED ROOF LEVEL FLOOR AREA CALCULATION C ..5 3 1Â·â€¢40 -0 Â£ P.Of 1 Â· =40â‚¬ a U U 39 fllia E .3.-EL EZZILL-J DURANTAV -*. - ~. 11 , 0- - 2-7=N*\9i \ / // 11 /3 ,% , ltd= rowland+broughton archtecture / urban des'gn//elor des;gl 1 l 82 234e hopkinsave 1830 blake st ste 200 ~ - 4 _ SIDEWALK - 9,1 PROPGRIÂ¥* 970 544 9006 0 303 308 1373 0 \6% 1 1. 1 ANISCAPE| aspen,Co 81611 denve, co 80202 A U- - I .1 1 970 544 3473 f 3033081375 1 F ] PLANTERS 1 1 {M 1 21 /MOVABLE J t' MIN CLR L,=:27 EAST SETBACK x 18'-00' / BIKE RACK "' 5 1.- % i -41% I \PI --ALL PLANTERS IN SETBACK T THRU 1 05 DRIVE Consultants ARE LESS THAN 30Â·Â· TO MEET CODE F <-5'-0" SETBACK 7 5 1 . 1 - 1. \ Ilun.ITÂ· Â· NEVJ / ILME-ERS t ELED XFRVIR EDFUÂ· . ..Â·< NEVN @Fl- UTILTY -, BO>ES CHATEAU CHATEAU . DUMONT CHAUMONT {3 -STORY) (3 -STORY) I 14 .* 11 Z I - 1% --, Â§ 1- P-Â·7Â· 9 Â· ..E - LL - 07.14 2015 DETAILED REVIEW MIN CLR E--1 0-1 Issue Ie.7-18-of ~fl I APPLICATION nZ 1 - --- --/---- . EXIST PLNTR . j \ - EXISTING DUMONT PARKING EXISTUTIL]TY 1 1 m ALLEY --rze-Â»e-/ I - - [I 2 1 9 Â· ' Â·Â· w 522 0 1. RETAINING WALL 6" ABOVE DRIVE LANE, -_1Â¥U.i:~ h : -cy' SETBACK ' 4 136 ABOVE PLANTER LESS THAN 30" IN SETBACK-1 PROPER~LINE T' ON \ EXIT .* Â·Â·~---p2SFI _ I ~ 1 | 30" H RAISED PLNTR k 4 30" H RAISED PLANTER ----â€¢ _-------22~2~.~*14-_30" H PLNTR-*.. FAME- L----Li___- 3'DEWALK ,__21 -- -- 14- ---- 1 1.- I u:%91-1--Mi=.td~ -- 1 RAMP DN 1 El -- TRASH/DELIVERIES 30Â·Â· SITE WALL & PLANTER 2% EXIT 3 36 H TOTAL STEPS FROM GLORY HOLE SIDEWALK TO DRIVE LANE SURFACE. / CONDOMINIUMS ENTRY/EXIT THAN 30' H IN SETBACK (3-STORY) -5 SETSACK MAIN BUT ONLY 2 24' H IN SETBACKLESS 1 I -t .111. - THE LITTLE - 3 NELL HOTEL . 0 . (4 - STORY) Â· z % 4 1 LI - 5Â·-0Â· SE-BACK- 1 up . PRIVATE SKY HOTEL RESIDENCE STAIR UP TO ~ 2-- 1-- -- ...4.--1 -- -- -- -H 1-1- . (2 - STORY) LOUNGE/DECK r----1 1 1! 1 UG STORd L---_ 1 LANDSCAPE AREA EXISTING ALPS PARKING ft A 1 VAULT I / 0 " - i . ... , PRFPERTY LINE f , U. 1 A e It ... 2 1 1 ALPS ACCESS/DRIVEWAY 4?30. I. 9. . dk F' v. *4 14*i 4 4i' / 4/ / ASPEN ALPS BUILDING (2-STORY) r _* 1/ PROJECT NO I 709 E DURANT AVE. \ ASPEN, CO 81611 \ r I 21406.60 ,. SHEET TITLE L J L J PROPOSED SITE PLAN SCALE 1/16" = + n,i PD1.1 /-7 7/Fle -. ./ LANDSCAPE ' ~ 1~NDSCA~E PRIVATE 'Â·fi , SOUTH SPRING STREET 1 PICK UP AREA * IyFA ~_ ~ 1 PROPERTYUNE 1 i SIDEWALK aN.*ladOM. SIDEWALK [3 0 Sr ~ SFH A PROPOSED PUBLIC AMENITY SPACE r. STREET LEVEL AREA 3,430 SF SUBTOTAL 2nd L.Vt PATIO 1 362 SF PUBLICROOFDECK 6 575 SF TOTAL 11 367 SF TOTAE<474%1 rowland+broughton NET LOT AREA 24,001 SF archttecture l urban des, A/enor des}gn PROPOSED PUBLIC 4 1 SIDEWALK 234 e hopkins ave 1830 blake st ste 200 aspen co 81611 denver co 80202 970 544 9006 0 303 308 1373 0 970 544 3473 f 303 308 1375 f -PROPOSED PUBLIC AMENITY SPACE AMENITY SPACE 2 575 SF 855 SF 1 1 / 11 1 1 / 11 1 1 It Id I N j 1 1 I i 4Â»Â»Â»02*Â»22-41% 1/ Consultan' 1 ----f 1 /4/Â» - I - -' 1 111111111 -~fl - ---I- 7% ,9/ / 79 /hOU. --1,7 CHATEAU CHATEAU DUMONT CHAUMONT , *~ (3 - STORY) (3Â·STORY) Issue 07 14.2015 DETAILED REVIEW APPLICATION ~1 1- po Â«~ 5% =77 5 P J fi to - 4 - POOL .Â· ALLEY - :1111 1 PROPERTYUNE I PLANTER | ~ | PLANTER 1 E-=3 1 SPA ~1 -' T/77 ELEV SIDEWALK DN SIDEWALK JU.Â·'777 h/ U '1 'lili, /iv' -p GLORY HOLE ~|, 1. Â· I ROOF 6=7:0519 L' p 05405122222 I 6-LE=fl - 1 CONDOMINIUMS (3 - STORY] ''-iL~Ir~ ||~~,fo-Eit*igi~ - T ./ r:== ==. GUARDRAIL F//4/ / E L THE LITTLE PROPOSED PUBLIC AMENITY SPACE NELL HOTEL ~{M-ffl//JU=LUM'#11/11/1111 1*J-*#mka 00 -ERJh // i-~ ill illil I 1 Ijttmll#/ I, I A 00 PUBLIC ROOF DECK 11 / j /\ 1 00 -1[13' (4 - STORY) 6575 SF CDC -- +'Â·-IH #eatenÂ«vpu 4/ 1 7 1 /YI-t-171-.,+,r,,-, -Â·[ lii 'A PLANTER v. ovER ROOF ~*3 SPA _- = 1 r l Ift r 1 0 1 , /L1 i>*i~' DDdb' ' r -TI \ /- 1 - --~-- PRIVATE 709 E DURANT AVE RESIDENCE ASPEN, CO 81611 - - L.j (2-STORY) ~~Â·,AN BLOGI,I' ""- ~' ' '' '<//.4 F-71177711 Â»4,7///M///74/fA/2%(A///%~ /AY//LOUNGEPATIO AREPT /#'A//\Â¥ A PROPOSED PUBLIC -JAIL*Â« l AMENITY SPACE 2ND LEVEL PATIO 1 362 SF r/yAL./9 / - PROPERTY LNE / A l, ALPS ACCESS/DRIVEWAY 1 1 .l 1 1% PROJECT NO 21406.60 / ASPEN ALPS BUILDING (2 - STORY) SHEET TITLE PROPOSED PUBLIC m AMENITY SPACE PLAN 0 a-J J L J L J SCALE 1/16'1=1'-0 L L-~ PD1.3b i ..IM + .......#T .CE'/4 '4, h NA Jut. 23 11 U LINE OF ROOF A OVE SOUTH SPRING STREET \4\- -% = DROPOFFAREA RAMP PROF'ERTYLINE SIDEWALK 1----- --%- rowland+broughton arch/'ecture/urban de""/ inf enor design 234 e hopkins ave 1830 blake st Gte 200 aspen, co 81611 denver co 80202 970 544 9006 0 303 3081373 0 ~ \ 970 5443473 f 303 308 1375 f if k A--j~-~ ' ft L PUBUC SIDEWALK Â· - /4 1 - 1-1 ILL-1 - ~ pROPERTY UNE f" ix h 11 -6 11 94R ". 4 - : 1 ( off 4 -1 I - -_ .--1,--1 -- 1 PLANTERS Consul/nts , 1:-ill\ ES 1 /1 W I FR 0 11 : 4- ~ -1 ~ LANDSCAPE AREA - SNOW STORAGE/SNOW SHEDDING NOTES: SNOW STORAGE AREA 1 1 - 0= 64 I & 2 1 p Z RETAIN SNOWWITH SNOWEENCES AND/OR CLIPS HAVE GUTTER & DOWNSPOUTS 1 Al SLOPED ROOF AREAS (DESIGNATED SNOWFENCE AREAS BELOW)V.'ILL Or- 1 02 1 1 f 4- 1.244% .0 TO COLLECT AND DISPERSE WATER, HEAT TRACE WILL BE INSTALLED AT SPECIFIC \ 2 ALL FLAT ROOFS AND PLANTERS WILL RETAIN SNOWAS DESIGNED 1% 1 E- fy li- i AREAS AS DESIGNED SNOWMELTED WILL BE MAINTAINED/SHOVELED ONTO SNOWMELTED REGIONS 4 ALL LODGE UNIT PRIVATE FLAT DECKS ILL HAVE SN-SLAB SNOV\,MELT 5 SJDEWALKS DENOTED AT SNOWMELTED ARE IN-SLAB TUBE RADIANT HEATING EXIT 8 4 <YT CONNECTED TO CENTRAL SYSTEM CONTROLS FOR TEMP AND MOISTURE 6 LANDSCAPED AREAS VUILL ACT AS SNOW STORAGE AREAS 47, Â¢Â·Â· Â· Â·'ar' ~ i Lil 07.14 2015 DETAILED r i "0 4 , 3..... -t to â‚¬ APPLICATION 3 ALL DECK AREAS HAVE IN-SLAB SNOVMELTED REGIONS, OTHER AREAS NOT J. Issue I '. - 2 - : REVIEW 7% It N P -1 T 7 1 f f-Li i=.73 , 1, :a.~C IL I.-tr.. 22* PROPERTÂ¥.IJNE #8 4/4 01.2 . _.-9 ALLEY PLOWED AND:MAINTAINED AS EXISTING PROPERTY LINE EXIT _4~ PLANTER SNOW STORAGE AREA ~ ~ PLANTER - .... 1,1 I %401'eve,4 Â·-Jk.*ID(24' ,~:~~.~~ D .,.gfiI/:--------~-'~:. E=:Â·~.Â·7'-----' J.~1-LE-LK.-- '-~-=:.=:"M8044**i:ELL'Nu~"'w'.-,npi:'~. M.UN~UÂ·27'- . .... L i -- HI--1 EXIT TRASH/DELIVERIES EXIT , PUBLIC SIDEWALK (SNOWMELTED) -1%%%" MAIN ENTRY 61 * L SKY HOTEL 1 14 11 1 1 1:1 11 1 1 . 709 E DURANTAVE. , ASPEN, CO 81611 SNOWMELTED 1 1-1- r-1~-1 __ ~-11--1 .-Ir--1 1â€ž1 1â€ž1 lili , 11 1 -1- -- f AREA@GARAGE I Â· - ..==Â»1 -1 0 RAMP - 9 i t. r-1 0\ .t EXISTING ALPS PARKING MAINTAINED AND PLOWED f: - -/ -%%0% tri t 4-0, ,Â·'' GARAGE ' LANDSCAPE AREA, kgRBRiN ENTRY lilli/ SNOW STORAGE AREA PROPERTY LINE . i PUBLIC SIDEWALK /1222*REAA Vi (SNOWMELTED) US /427 / y / 040 - -- A - PUBLIC STREET AF"1PaW.A.xWMJ 0*/,7 -_~ _ ~ETED) ~ lk. ..,4â‚¬v_. . ''RP 21406.60 0 7 ----4 PROJECT NO >L -4.64. ~ 1 -2,2. 9%1 1- SHEET TITLE -9242.1 - SNOW STORAGE & * SNOW SHEDDING 1 - / m PLAN PLAN TRUE L l n-1 1 NORTH NORTH SCALEÂ· 1/16"=1'-0 ( 1 ~ PD14- Level 1 Snow Storage Plan aa I' \Pol.4/ SCALE 1/16"=1'-0" PD1.4 f g TAINE P4OV,ED SIDEWALK 23311 iP Â¥3HV 3/VDSONV1 r. Un architecture / urban de/grn / 1/enor des,gn rowland+broughton 234e hopkins ave 1830#lakest ste 200 aspen co 81611 denver, co 80202 970 544 9006 0 303 308 1373 0 9705443473f 303 3081375 f PROPERTYLINE STAFF STAFF RR/SHWR J RRIHIR 5Â· SE,MACK 14-9" , Consult@* . 1 Â¤ 11 41 1 11 DIR HK Il El ~F~~~ C SAFE HR . 9 ~ BTAFF F1NANCE ~ 1~ -~ L~CKERS L~nlh~=111-u=h RECORDS |Â§ | 10 1 CORRIDOR ~ HFUIT VU ~SKP/LINEN ~ ~~ 44.- -5'-O" SETBACK LAUNDRY ' L-[1.1 Â· EMPLOYEEE ~ WOMEN'S U up#HHIR / Dil ING / ABOVE Lch j STAIR 1% 1 E-1 : 9 919'9191-1u 3 ' , ELECâ„¢IC . L -J ~ 0 3 61 0 ~ -7 WALK IN < COOLER _ 1 1-1110: . MEETING PRE-FUNCTION FITNESS ~ 07 14.2015 DETAILED ROOMS SPACE REVIEW :7 . APPLICATION 1 1 COOLING. 0 in 2_Ic] rrnv cot .0~2 , TOWER -*01 1 - r -- 1 3 -11 Â¤ 1 1 0 UIC REFAI~ 9 1 1 m R /1 1% 1 1 A M 5 : -LINEOFBUIDING-OVE Z [I] , g _|Â£~'-0Â· SETBACK o MECH/ELECAUTILITY ~ 1 pm.1 X SHORING WALL .1 F7-F-' 9% : --p E ~IELâ‚¬llgICHASE'21.11 11 1-1 1 1.111'i Jiii '01 1'1'i iii /'TAÂ·JEI'll''ll' '-1'1 ' '10'' '-VII 111 11.I 1111 - LOCIU=RS -21111,111111 11 b '' ' '[t'' ''~'''All'!111'1011'-1 11~ 111111 2 ELEV.- 1 2 1 2- 1 1 STAIR 2 /,1 1 LOBBY -liE 2 ' 1 EL,V 2~ Elm/ 3%2 - 6 _ -1,~ ~ 442-5' SETBACK 12.?Am!1NG SPEES i./.. 4 - ENG. 0 0 0. Ill 41 1 - OFFICE ,9 4 STACED 3 *TACKEJ 2 SFACES PAR~NG SP, CES a r - -MARKING: PAGES PARKING GARAGE 54 TOTAL- PARKING SPACES Â· â‚¬ i - - - - Â· SKY HOTEL '1 1 0 c - - 8 O 11-Af~~ . 5'-CY' SETBACK- B 15 PARTNG * --6EJ -r . 0 uP 0 0 0 41 ASPEN, CO 81611 709 E. DURANT AVE 'Fa h . . FficÂ».*c- r- 0 \ 1 \ â€¢1/ \ / \ %4 \ \ 1% \ \ CES ~ ~ ~,Â· ~FÂ·ARIâ€¢INGAPACES 9 \ \ \ pt/ \ t Xi ' ' " ' ExISTIN.ARKING .ao- 2 - 91 *Irc-~ 119 'â€¢k WORKSHOP / H - / /-1 / ;4 / 156. ~> *49 6 <4Â« PROJECT NO 21406.60 / / - LEGEND SHEET TITLE BASEMENT Ll FLOOR PLAN | PLAN TRUE NORTH NORTH SCALE: 1/16" = 1'-0" c El -MMER.wAR. ~ 1 ~ PD2.0 - Basement Ll Plan /.h ,) A ~.~ SCALE 1/16' = 1'4 aa PD2.0 m GARAGE i.)59 r.9 Tzy HT.-*VAT~IX.*.'Eh'~<.'-â‚¬-â„¢U[~}CU~NMW 7*:7/*7~;*IriS'Nlt/=#r. # 'Â¤~11:'=.411'41~:::CM='.*.Â· t? al-Or' SETBACK 0Â¢ 1=7- 69 3,4,1 0*. 104' ~ ,>lovelas ..0.,9 r. rowland+broughton rz.1/,Ch_ architecture /urban design //enor deslgn 234 e hopkins ave 1830 blake st gte 200 . aspen,/81611 denver. co 80202 970544 9006 0 303 308 r 373 0 970 544 3473 f 303 308 1375 f 27 SIDEWALK _ 4 -- Il | PLANTERS Al_I _:. 1 Consu*b 01 01 11 /0 1. 1 E , 01-?11 - LODGE 041 Crl LODGE DRIVE - UNIT L=.J Lr=-1 UNIT L-Â·-*I ~ BRU ~ r~ 1 / 1 >h 2 I f 4 1 â‚¬-9 1 E CI ,-5Â·-0Â·' SETBACK STIR /1 \N \M IL-EGEJILim)(- L -1---- - ~r& .1 -368*1IHIRIE- rE.IR 11 1/44\ 1 301 UNEN Mt?mm?1 ~-1-ITI_Irt ELEC XFRMR , UTILTf 11/ . Â§@F+&71!It~ â€ž1'~~1 ~ DN|fIFI BOXES -- u--, A- 4 @:fERL~_W i CHATEAU ---7 CHATEAU DUMONT ' CHAUMONT Â«04 z 0 Ul (3-STORn (3-STORY) ~NE ~02~RRIOO10.-21~ 11 F (B+IK)U Issue 07.14 2015 DETAILED ~ Jl 1.hm~~__1 FIM 9 REVIEW APPLICATION \ 1 0 ~it_ Ih...1} 1 11_2-,108~B*g-' |.,Juw !~ LP=:11J3 M --- 0-151 1 *1 0 k--2 f =F' w.'u luvuodGE--1 4 P 3 v UNIT 11 9 n )O W*ALM.CE-I- 1 [EZEJUNEJ -~=9 .06=11 /th ~ SALES E 3 EXISTING DUMONT PARKINCk ~ /P:),2 W - - RSVR 1 a. L 1 DIR. 1 1| SALES 1 OFFICE e ALLEY 9 r MNGR B H 9 5 1 -7/1 DN b 1 11 UNCERUmICNDI 'I' A:5Â·l,~ SETBACK J PROPERTY LINE r, DN PLANTER ---2 !*14- PLANTER_41 9 ' Aliii 1 GREASE VAWI T ~ .1 | SIDEWALK 9 ~ DNI RAMP ON 9 | SIDEWALK 4.r- /1 1 -- -- -- â€¢--1 LOBBY 1 0.1 U HOTEL L -~J Up I IL] TRASH # I GLORY HOLE % 4 ing Fl] [1[1*dE'ff d] 01 = _10 f--7 560 SF 61 1 02*1.-LE u k e CONDOMINIUMS LIRLR Dth LOBBY ~7 - r.=ill-- .*IÂ£3FI- LmaiLI[*0 -*; t.-3 -..,Cm.U 2 / ADU11 - (3-STORY) f ENTÂ¢Â¥ r-,/96/J 1 Il n / BDRM BORF--- ,<38Â·-5Â· SETBACK 9REIGHT' B.O.Hi , L 1 -1 A-JL_.2.,1 i' -1Â¤:1..â‚¬Ell PW#E N UP =a Opi ILY 1 ELEV 11 &7 &1 '|l F-,5 8 721 AID -1,9 1tt5JD hT -ly '~ 1114= ...1 AlujÂ©> R 4= r#Â£1*/RENHRUGHTU =L STAIR 2 -~~~ ~- * - Â£*ySTAIR TO 91! THE LITTLE 1 - 'U ~09' LOUNGE ABOVE CORRIDOR NELL HOTEL Â· ~ (4 - STORY) - . r,0.- LINE OF RECEPTION d Lfic &4 2.fid &204=U&~0~434Oli - E~=~L ~ I L LODG LODGE DG -7 WALL BELOW-1- SKY HOTEL FOUNDATION VEÂ®F - A SHOP ~1 5Â·-0Â·Â· SETBACK-. 4 00 an'~ f ~E El l~Pr [] LbiÂ¥ I] 196 [] UNCE [ ] 112â‚¬ I] 3 1 Ul--1 *) RESIDENCE ASPEN1 CO 81611 L_ PRIVATE 709 E DURANT AVE 1 11 1 , 11 1 111. ,"1 ,/1 (2-STORY) / SPECIAL EVENT \ SPACE 11-1--1 /\\5\\1 J .___-J ALPS P~KING B 1 1 2 \\ 4% i i i Ext \ 39Of'. 1 / /.\Â£7 \ \ \ I \ \E. \ \\I 11"11 -L j / 1 aTÂ¥~E 1 7 \ \\ ./00 /04,927 -- -- -- -- - - i / 1 f, 0 4rh:--0- ALPS ACCESS/DRIVEWAY , 00 / 4. X37* 6449 / 1 69 --hul / PROJECT NO. 4 - / 2140660 / \./ ASPEN ALPS 9 v (2-STORY) SHEETTITLE f- 1 BUILDING LEQENQ Fl HOTEOL~ / ~ LEVEL 1 FLOOR PLAN L.3 '- Â£ 0 i El ....spu.OMMONAM -- D PLAN TRUE 0) 2 0 COMMERCIALAREA NORTH NORTH SCALE: 1/16" =1'-0" MELy SCALE 1/16"= 1'-0" pa PD2.1 L _-1 ~ 1 ~ a.1- Levell Plan 1 ./5 2 9 Aâ€¢.*-Â»â„¢-4*,46Â»N.*TIoN'-ED-.I'DI]CU~MTIFTME Ii~ii.~til*210 fi *WIâ‚¬./6 Â«41, 1 SIDEWALK 0Â¢ -OPERTY LINE - --- - - IF==11 PROPERTY LINE ~ PICK UP AREA ~/ DROP OFF AREA '~' >1:091 r. rowland+broughton archhdure T urban deIgn h/enor design 234 e hopkins ave 1830 blake st ste 200 aspen 081611 denver. co 80202 970 544 9006 0 303 308 1373 0 970 544 3473 1 303 308 1375 f PROPER. UNE J + t. x I.1 92 N Consu#n' JII DECK 11 m 7215 Lb)* LODGE f 8'-2" UNIT . wr- 1911@ DRIVE THRU DECK i ~ <~'10" SETBACK 2.Â· _ F ~ ~ 2 1:M -1 <-- Â· DECK 017=174 -_-__- [2-1 LINEN P VAN+Â®1,1-, - .r rISTAIR *#44~ ~ ~. 77*RuMIl EA121*Fe W Fi -- Un-*- CHAUMONT CHATEAU CHATEAU DUMONT 13-STORY) (3 -STORY] Issue ' ,-L.-&1 14 120 07.14 2015 DETAILED REVIEW APPLICATION i| E [1-1 2i P= rl= LODGÂ¢ P M p 3 0-1 i + V to E-1 WDGE n r=- 2 LU I Il UNIK 1 1 UNIT / ~ ----- ---- 0 Â¥k 1 LODGL Ir-|11 1005 ~ N- Z v LE:~uNITILI Lull e 1 ~ ALLEY A W . 2 0 i 9 W --A APÂ·04 1 |, .-IW SETBACK . u. 9 r I 4 12Â·-3'Â· ==1*E==q 15;04 D ' LOOM PROPER. UNE T.1 o UNIT 28 :.5 1 ITT 0 -O 4 Th _ DECK 1 -3Â·-2" u DECKL . - DECK || . ~ |~|~||ROOFBELOW ~ ~ ~ --- -- 1 1 lu -al k ~ ELEJ--1~_ Ul ' L ~-4~=25 -1:.1 4 00 230 0 ~ LOBBY lq=0-1 0 94 ~ 5-71/7 L~z~:n |'~.O H U.\ 1. 01 GLORY HOLE 3 nlÂ° 8 ELEV 2 i W '-1-11 ~CHEN , 892 43-43 4-112~E ~71 :.*T 1* =11=Ld Lte-111-=P L.- LE~fl:*1* L jo DIE 11 DECK CONDOMINIUMS (3-STORY) V 1/ 94 -5 SETBACK 9 U g m >hl< fIR >Ed< 83 7-F-cu,ts f=t nj' f 1 FREIGHW ELEV ~ Q JU=kl|./12 - =NJ'==2Â¢=flult=bi~' - - Lmf)=dib THE LITTLE CORRIDOR 20: 1 NELL HOTEL ~ (4-STORY) C:0-1 LOUNGh, 900-0 al go[1]Â©~p 6- mfdorti,29&9Jili:21,111'izbiljiliZtilYriv 22~4 1 UNEN T 0 0 (2-STORY) 1 0\ 1..1 54, SETBACK_+ L*'IT Bl_1 UNIT A-w j 04!Lil-w i l tilIuT 1 11-3!!Ir L IU -3 Lt;EltL_1 1 LcIPPE Flri Lei*T T-LB'* r -1 i#63ET TifiNE >~ LOPGE ~1 ~ Lob@E r 1 Lo 12 91/2" 709 E DURANT AVE RESIDENCE ASPEN, CO 81611 LOUNGEPATIO AREA 1 UP ~2---4 PRIVATE A 4 9 - , RAISED 'L-y ~~-CRE~WALLON-r 2 0 ST.4.All/GREEN -r WAR,1 .1., 4 - (FN 1/ J ,* I / \ \~,t) '43,/ / P \ PROPER.UNE ..19 17\Y*~WIFI lili 1 : ALPS ACCESS/DRIVEWAY MUHEIGHT{4Â·~'Â·IM 6344/= / / tÂ« 3Â·-0" ROO'PARAPET 6 + .\ \M \0'' / e PROJECT NO 21406 60 / / ASPEN ALPS 144 V BUILDING LEGENQ (2-STORY) SHEET TITLE LEVEL 2 FLOOR PLAN C] 0 O 2-2.M --2=1 JLJL--1--- SCALE_ 1/16" =1'-0 PD2.2 i~.1 Â£K 1%2.5-.*0&=*#21;./5 / IFT--TQ*â€¢.usED-Tweu7-2-~*MEN 51% ======0722==S==ALL u~ &-&*~-â€¢*CTÂ·Ep.--1. 0,â„¢- t? -Â£52%Â·10~" SETBACK *DECK ROOF BEL.O~BOVE M 277 3111...CH. r. =yn rowland+broughton arc:hitecture / urban design / intenor design 234 e hopkins ave 1830 blake st ste 200 aspen. co 81611 denver co 80202 970 544 9006 0 303.308 1373 0 970 544 3473 f 303 308 1375 f -IL PROPERTY UNE I 2-1 4': '- ConsultantsÂ· L 11~-0. T-L*t-r-IMO 11#/ELF-rco j ~ROC F 6 LODGE UNIT 1-41 & ill _ 5.77 E ED_J ~ I -5'-0" SETBACK +4. 1~ UNEN 5 -=01] 1 Tr'J upG#11#4' - ~, 12-3 1 31*Â£311 8-b~i~eN IC] 0 .9==- = 2 Ill 27'-91/ / CHATEAU CHATEAU DUMONT CHAUMONT LODGE (3 - STORY) (3-STORY) Issue: r-nUNIT L._ U~-' U.1 Fil2==Tilg APPLICATION i| 07 14,2015 DETAILED REVIEW 16...k LR/o!â‚¬*4,1,,DECK D- Frrit/MI Ill - -1| LODGE ' AV Ul - 23Â·-2117 f=DA DECK r -- P -1 1- -6-3 - . - LODGEr-Â© {P[)43 & u.1 :E* ' 11[j 1{111 IF] Ull i 0 ---- 4 r- ~ I 9%1~01 16â€¢18 LaJ==19]61 1 : v x 2 a. 1 Ici E- U | : ALLEY 0 4 Flf- 2 fr- 7-1 1 1 I D .LODGE L ~ ~5Â·-0Â·Â· SETBACK '? .. PROPERTYLINE ~ . M . Â·L==t,NIT -0 ., 11'-7, I [-1 I r :L' DICK 1.21 1 L ,_v~DECKA,7 11----,4 -- ~ R'~F BELOW .-1L DECK i --rr 1,2,62= 1---1 *9be:*8 k 4 E -Â¢-1-14 06 04 p em gil urrw Â«ir#0 0~Li-~ <9- im &WY L GLORY HOLE 1 r--1/44. N#-7 Iii=â„¢] 161 .1 A .11 0 84 0./ti-Ir--1 CONDOMINIUMS DECK i~:*:~91 0*=Ifl MLEVATOM ' LOCK-OFF _|W U====U LOME/FRACTN~r- -|1. 0 | ' /7-5Â· SETBACK (3-STORY) E-y*BLEF-1 1--Lmi:IZII*Le ~J- .0,1 UP.--3 L.,3=1 9 Am L.& 4REIGH1 rtm==r-~,3--dcK Fia My]1 1 1 0 h . ST AIR 2 ,,AL-6*0.Al STORAGEN Er/AJ19/ L.--UL.14 6691,-LO W.ir THE LITTLE , le,1/ Ur==~ / I rn==r n C:p~r-lit=TEÂ©frIE='[am r CORRIDOR |~ LODGe CT. DECK f NELL HOTEL 8 (4 -STORY) 7~-07 r-~~| LÂ®GE/FRACT 11U Fl-i~~ 4 -CD UNIT UNIT â€¢ 91 UNIT / UNIT UNIT UNIT 1*15] UNIT 8 f 5'-CY' SETBACK--1 f. 1/ PRIVATE 709 E DURANT AVE 3'-11" M=â€¢=-=t='1-U iLL*' de --11 RESIDENCE ASPEN, CO 81611 DECK h -24 , CA.3 -EXI~1 -- I 4-/\-1 DECK DECK ~ DECK- - ~~ ~ - ROOF BELOW (2 - STORY) r F %m J* ' tria PROPER. LINE \ I , ALPS ACCESS/DRIVEWAY 0/ 44%~.:.' ,///If %0+ / ' .0. $. / /e PROJECT NO \ N // I 2140660 I \ \V/ / / ASPEN ALPS BUILDING LiQEGQ (2-STORY) SHEET TITLE 1 | HOTEL/LODGE LEVEL 3 FLOOR PLAN 13 O PUBLIC SPACE~COMMON AREA O 0 JLJL,_P-- PD2.3 SCALE: 1/16" = 1'-0" 1 0 ~RAGE 44, 4 *:Jr,5'22208:427.222,54:.'UZ: 'i-Ton,1,~A~-~0,~,i./0*4'14â€¢E-Â©Ge F c*Ii,Glert.â‚¬..I H 09 SETBACK 043 Rory PE'.9'Af DRIVEWAY PROPERâ„¢UNE DZECOK ' ~0 r. rowland+broughton PD" 8.,11 l archuted/re / urban design /,/enor des,gn 234 e hopkins ave 1830 blake st ste 200 aspen,cc}81611 denver, co 80202 970 544 90060 303 308 1373 0 9705443473f 303 308 1375 f 0 PROPERTY LINE . W (9 r*------ ------E-AO-------7-- 1 24 -4 - ---- -- --.2Â»Ga--- lf 1 - Consul~n. DECK | - e FF===m - 1 1/ 0-HANG ~ -- LODGE/FRACT~ 5'-0" SETBACK 1 1 - 1 1 UP 11 - | 12'.3 0 11 1 1 0 1 27-91/2 OCK FF CHATEAU CHATEAU A E i 7-8" 23-21/7 1 DUMONT CHAUMONT (3 - STORY) (3-STORY) DECK Issue 1 1 L 'Â»crt el* 1 1 -1 /=3 07.14 2015 DETAILED 1 REVIEW I i | tb . 3 8: 1 APPLICATION $ 1 1. P052 0 1 1 F ' I fODGENCT /6-3 /..E, 1 1 1 lu O 'J~ F V LU 1 1 131 11 , A rpo':1 1 w W P 1 1. ALLEY E CO 0, ' 17-3.- . FAIL 0 0 9 I Â·0Â·Â· SETBACK 9 D | ~ m* j., /1 rc9FF W GARAGE EXHAUST --------- N.------------------------------- 6 -O - ELEV 1 = r i -'1622- I.i==Il 0 7 ~ 1 I t! DN DECK 3 /17 3-/12" 1 N IT 111 - ELEV PO . 1 4 111 1! EQUIP ~~~ 1 LOBBY r 2/1 17 GLORY HOLE 11 3 PC]62 , W LiTFJ 091 U - 10-HANG 1 --I.. 1 1-31/7 CONDOMINIUMS 1 0 LOCK-OF LODGE/FRACT. LJ UP DN 1 (3-STORY) --- '-5" SETBACK | | ~R~STROOM ~ ELEV 1 Q J Â«- ri:7 8Â·-9 7/8 N ~ 1 0-HANG 6 M #REIGHt , 0 = - , 1. i 6 1. 0 PRIVATEE LOUNGE '07? -11 1 ,-1 - Li-Lkl,/ ~ RAISE~ c THE LITTLE gaa= 3 i 9/17 6 || i NELL HOTEL CORRIDOR MPU 00 4 [4-STORY) | O 0 15] - 11 r'=1Â£ =C .4,1 r 1 1 LO RACT. - - LODGE)FRACT. LODGE/FRACP-- 1 11 1 1 10.2 , ..... 0 7/17 I I I | | PRIVATE | 709 E DURANT AVE 3712Â· 1 1 RESIDENCE I ASPEN. CO 81611 3 - STORY) 1 DECK DECK DECK 1 1 1 1,1-5"6 11 1 1-7- 'W R b f 72 - -0 Ill I )0 .0 ALPS ACCESS/DRIVEWAY /1 40\ ///> O.di 04'\ \ / '7 104 - PROJECT NO ASPEN ALPS BUILDING - SHEET TITLE LEGEND (2-STORY) LEVEL 4 FLOOR PLAN 0 0 5 SCALE 1/16 " = 1'-0" UJ O .~|~|11|ERCIALAREA PD2.4 â‚¬K t: ~Â£*fEEIEELFEE 11 22 10'ISETBACK 3/4 ,-HANG 3Ndlk,LN34Okid r. rowland+broughton 4 d- mulm/si-/1/enordes/en 234 e hopkins ave 1830 blake st ste 200 aspen. co 81611 denver co 80202 970 544 9005 0 303 3081373 0 970 544 3473 f 303 308 1375 f PROPER. LINE Ir'r"ll Const!*n. 1'â‚¬" rfPELLQEZEZZL - s -,54-C+fA 3-- 3"'-E236EE''"'zz= -_21=En - ~4'-0Â·Â· SETBACK 21./. 1/1//4/Il.Il-ffL_) - -41, L - CHATEAU CHATEAU b -- DUMONT CHAUMONT - 31 (3 - STORY) (3-STORY) Issue - - - W.* 07.14 2015 DETAILED TEMP TRANSPARENT - 71 SOUND BARRIER 7 / 171-- 2 >1% (8'-0" MAX HGT AFF~ REVIEW i ......... "/17 22 APPLICATION POOL LOUNGE Illlt DECK AREA I TEMP TRANSPAREN- 1 4 r-EE_, SOUND BARRIER, _ (8L0Â·' M~ HGT AFF) ES" 1 121_ 7 , Â£- L 1-1 w WOOD 1;TEFS ALLEY - POOL H -~0-HANG 9 2 co r._,~ '15'-0" SETBACK 0 9 0 :Z PROPERTY LINE T.1 1 -MECH & KITCHEN :6 7 N 21 L / FLIES, CHIMNEY ENCLOSURE $ \.4 W - |ELEV ~ 1, P 1 114L 3 1 17-- |1||| I' - - GLORY HOLE EQUIP ~--1' 1 . i .STAIR - -- 9 4%'lili ./11 . - FÂ·Ix ,--,-,~Ii I,Â·, ~1 1 L CONDOMINIUMS -EE=-1 -r-2.1 1 ,.----AA;~ ,~ (3 - STORY) 6-3" GUARilF 11 Il I~ Â« F Â»3 4 = ,%41~BACK O-1-ANI~1+ 3 E | ~.__ I SEEUEVEL= PI AN FOR INFORMATIC i. : .lt 1 i I ROOF| CHANG N 2 +11 , LL ROOMS --E THE LITTLE (MOVABLES'14) 34*- 0 [2 NELL HOTEL *.%44Â£ 7 LOUNGEDECKAREA 00 (4-STORY) T 0 0 1-1 4 7 mc 5"/12 5Â·'/12Â·Â· 1 | ~ SKY HOTEL =2 1 RNSE~WPLATFORM- ~ 11 =64 101 [0 L ~ -- \ -7 2Â·Â· r 17' -33==n_ ~ SPA --0. fÂ« - <Ii- =Dy- 5-0Â·Â· SETBACK-h , . - 231[7110 Â£ 47 GUARDRAIL -- 2' / 1 FP FLUE FPFLU 1 111 41111111 La 1- \ 91 1 11 PRIVATE 709 E DURANT AVE 4/12' | I zt -3/7-Il it,1 lili' 1[-~-2Â»_t~f.5::"19*- -- RESIDENCE ASPEN, CO 81611 (2-STORY) -A~_3â‚¬Â· te I I 0-HANG -6 0 1 41 r r I I 6,+G \ I I ' ALPS ACCESS/DRIVEWAY / 7% /7 44 PROJECT NO 21406 60 4 .0 V / / ASPEN ALPS \<4 V BUILDING ~ ~ (2-STORY) SHEET TITLE LEGEND ROOF PLAN 0 ;4'Â·.~ PuBLICSPACECOMMONBEA 0 PLAN TRUE EIL An L NORTH NORTH SCALEÂ· 1/16" = 1'-0" 1 PD2.5 -FET-~r BE - m .A... L-_-1 \.PD:5/ SCALE J/16'Â· = 1Â·-0Â· PD2.5 e r * J:nuct, Â·in==52:11't I,H-i-T-Â·.aâ€¢Eliâ„¢Â«~T,â‚¬Pfrl!)/a#.4 magâ‚¬09.E.KFIE,6:-:=.' 5j IÂ°~ Â° SETBACK PROPERTY LINE 6 0 SOUTH SPRING STREET PROPERTY UNE E]N*4-0,4Â£ 3Nr,Aialad<]Bd t--4 4 t. JSJ.: 22. 0 . .. 1. . .. 1 1. r.*. 4 - J 2â€¢- . '. -e-, - .21 kil . .....AL-d< 4 274Â· 1. .14* . liti,4 4 .=aM-31.22- 5-- 1 46 Ap: IS/*Im .:4*/divkcâ€žtl~ -rr $ ... 1 -~ .~Â¢ 'li-ir/-291/ 8- -I :L .-. 41-14 I - . .--2. tar 4*11 .4 - 0%3% C' 11, ' 2'21-~~ 1. A #%49#- r . .4.4 3%*4 .7. T.. .. 1~.-T /*Â¥Â»,1--L 4-7 4.Â»23Â¢R~ - 0 - = 12%*fyi 42*=b,es 1:'. 6/42 ..91/5 31 2 -*#./14. 1 -- *44'//='.-- -- 2 $ y 'W" -A I * ,- A- 1 4 4 IXâ‚¬ 4,4=9 - -1 - -7,1 0#:22. .. e ::r- gt## ./ ..... I . 4 -4 .. . A .. .. r tÂ»t ---11--limr . - k ~tr . . 9,â€¢ -Â·ES@Â¥< r-14-23 - --- 1 - ill ~ 2441.f 1. . im-=mi.-1 , '6 43.2191./1 w. ePA ''.4, I -- )* e- I. . .bi:,2 -*ar 3- *-,2- d~ ' :r?- -4.2.: ---.-* -1 - --7 4 :L il~ll/4:IFTâ€ž ~u-x ~~1~~~ l â‚¬29 ,L=,f d lili 43< I. f - r_tt. = ..t?L- , 17 Â« ... ./ .. ELEVATION ELEVATION OF ONOF MOST ROOF HEIGHT OVER ACTUAL ROOF HEIGHT YOR LABEL FINISHEDGRADE L GRADE RESTRICTIVE TOPOGRAPHY OVER MOST RESTRICTIVE CATION 1 7942 2 7942'.4 PROPOSED 7981 '-0 38 - 10" rE 2 7941' - 9 7942'- 1" PROPOSED 7981 - T 39-10" 3 7941Â·- 7 7942' - 1" PROPOSED 7981 -0 39Â·-5 4 7941'-6" 7942' - 1 PROPOSED 7981Â· -0 39-6 5 7938'-11 7939' - 10 PROPOSED 7978 - T 39' - 8 6 7938' - 9' 7938-8 NATURAL 7978 - 7Â· 39- 11' 7 7937' - 9 7937' -10 PROPOSED 7977 - 0Â·Â· 39' - 5Â· 8 7937' - 11 7939' - 6" PROPOSED 7971'.5 33 - 6 9 7939'-1 0 NATURAL 7978 -7 38-9" rowland+broughton architecture /urban design /intenor deign 10 7938' - 3" 7940' - 0' PROPOSED 7978-2 .- 11 11 7942' - 0" 7942Â· -21/4 PROPOSED 7981'-11" 39Â·-11 234e hopkins ave 1830 blake st ste 200 aspen,co 81611 denver co 80202 12 7943' -0 7942'-10' NATURAL 7973Â· - 5" 30-5 970 544 9006 0 303 308 1373 0 13 7941'-10" 7943'-1" PROPOSED 7976-2 34 4 970 544 3473 f 303 308 1375 f 14 7941-5 7943' - 4 PROPOSED 7974-5 33 - 0' 15 7940Â· -10 7943' - 7 PROPOSED 7973Â·- 5 32'- 7" 16 7944' - 2" NATURAL 7971- 10 27 8 17 7940 -10 7943' -11 PROPOSED 7976' - 7 35- 9 18 7947-2 7944' - 4" PROPOSED 7974' - 5 32' - 4' 7945' - 6" NATURAL 7976 - 7" 31' - 1' 8Â·WIDE HORIZONTAL 20 7947 - 0 7945' -3 NATURAL 7973' - 5" 28'- 2" WOODSIONG 21 7946 - 10 7945 - 1 NATURAL 7974' - 4" 29' - 3 22 7947 - 0 7944 -11" NATURAL 7976 -7 31- 3 Consultants 14.DE HORIZONTAL WOOD *ING 23 7947 - 0 7944' -4 NATURAL 7973 -5 29' - 1" 24 - 7943-9 NATURAL 7981' - T 37' - 10 6Â·WIDEVERTICAL WOOD 51% 25 7946 - 10' 7944' -1 NATURAL 7981'-11" 37' - 10 26 7946-10 7943'-11" NATURAL 7983' - 9" 39' - 10" 27 - 7943' - 5' NATURAL 7981'-10" 38'- 5 28 7943 - 4Â· NATURAL 7982' - 0" 38 - 8' ~ 7943% 10 NATURAL 7983' - 9" 39-11" 30 7943 -11" NATURAL 7981' - 10'r 38' - 11" 31 7942 -10 NATURAL 7982-3" 39'- 5" 32 7939' - 6" NATURAL 7978-7 39'-1 | ~ ~~00 SLA~~ 33 7942 - 0 NATURAL 7981 - 7 39Â· - 7Â·Â· 34 7943-6 NATURAL 7971 -10 28' - 4 Issue -MECH KITCHEN FLUES CHIMNEY 07 142015 DETAILED REVIEW ~--ELEVATOR O~FIREPLACE FLUE , FIREPLACE FLUEn 1/2 POINT FROM APPLICATION CABANAS BEYOND (TEMP/MOVABLE 81 6 \ EAVE TO RIDGE-1 r-1/2 POINT FROM 1 1 GLASS / / EAVE TO RIDGE GUARDRAIL / FiREPLACE FLUE 1/2 POINT FROM EAVE TO RIDGE-~- GLASS GUARDRAIL - 4 FFIREPLACE FLUE -/=-1/2 POINT FROM ~~ T 0 CONC J .1 1 ROOF DECKA r-T o CONC DECK -/7 EAVETORIDGE-~ '7*= , - -1+7- - -12- /12 - ---- - - --- TO CONC T-r---'r-i*jr 7/9~..1-- , ~12 ~ 12 2 1/2 POINTFUM - - - ~55-GUARDU)[30-~ 4'9131 - 12'IX 12> 1 \ ., 2' C--1-_- _- :41 ~--~9.21~ _ ~ ROOF DECK B 4 4 4 \ EAVE TO RIDGE v _~ 137'-9" 7 : 2- -Â·. 31715 3" FF'* 1.~E] 3 --21- r-m--"Pletpr- 7mtr3 -n= r-~,- ------ ---/1 UU ~ 12' - M 121.i 124~.~rit--7 __- T w T 0 CONC 1 ... _ 4 6 Of - .~U-3-- ____id- ___ Â· - 8 1Â·3Â·tuj.t_*tEIFi --: 15Â· ~~_ 'r- 4_~~7 -- -, - - ~., N 5 5" V ..=r T 3 0, J 1 LEVEL IA_ - - --r--1----7 --r-- 1-v, ++-'-1 -*---- ._ TOCONC 1---LE..UU=Ul-,1 -3-- *=-1.1 LEVEL 48 1 J 1~el[ 411 %1 111 7- 1 ammIL=~21-~ -0 =11----- 18 El 1 1 E CtiÂ»+12*1 =*4 416. 1151 33 1 33 [8[8 k Â« -]bl~*-Â· -5-- -'' + 484 11 T O CONC , I -11*.Eh .1 i LEVEL 3A -- ----1 -~:,LE:L-=3= -_ __ -_ --- _--- -~~* 94 -473~SERLÂ«*17 3 i e --- -r U.-13/1 Trum Â»-0 ----------- TO CONC 6 1 1~--1"-173 /1. LEVEL.384- c, 10-5pi~-[- : -. ZE 118'-3" T r 6 03 2*dil]M flpi 13 [1*11*112*mlimU TIF] FIFf T] RE -Fflfr.6--f--. un -+R-41--ifiÂ·'1 2~i~in _~â„¢ 11 TO CONC I -E E 2A - 6 - 3(411 - '~---f~ - ~~- r 111-6' I , H .LL.=23+~I=449Â«%511 11 -1~~f~Ell T 0 CONC 1 1 J_ d LEVEL 28 1 J -1 . mi- ,-- - - ~ UP --E'----T--F- --- -i/W--7--T Â· e.== 4 %1 0 i--r-,--- =1~~ ~~_ ' 41 0 Â® - 9.= 31 3[3 32 33 i gil ~ N I ll TO CONC -- 14 . 11 li 39 -7 -99 9.17 13 ' 4 4 LEVEL lA 7 100-0" T 0 CONC -~r- -- P P P DRIVE -THRU LEVEL 1B RECESSEDPATIO~AL~AYBELOWALLEÂ¥ EMION --- P 97 -0 P -- BEYOND ALLEY ELEVATION FOREGROUND ELEVATION ALLEY (NORTH ELEVATION) DURANT AVE (NORTH ELEVATION) SKY HOTEL ~~ NORTH EXTERIOR ELEVATION 709 E DURANT AVE ASPEN, CO 81611 FDORMERIS / EXCLUDED FROM E HEIGHT & /1/POINTFROM /T O CONC DECK /1/2 POINT FROM /DC)RMER IS CALCULATIONS-~ g EAVE TO RIDGEn ~ EAVE TO RIDGE / HEIGHT / EXCLUDED FROM TRELL1S ,-TO CONC DECK ~ FIREPLACE FLUE / CALCULATIONS ~ /-1/2 POINT FROM \ / WE. /97*t'~F-mi;=l_ 1GLASS GUARDRAIL ~ FFIREPLACE FLUE /1 ~ EAVE TO RIDGE \ GLASS GUARDRAIL TO CONC I fl- __RPOLDECIA T 0 CONC 140 -gÂ· T / 1 ROOF DECK B - - - - - - 9*JL_-tI91EN_LL JIJI' b mmi 137Â¥ TO CONC CD _LEVEL 4A 131 -0 PROJECT NO | TO CONC' 21406 60 _LEMEL'IL 1 - - J- il-ill - 'LE' ~ ~ [ 1-' 128Â· 0" ~ ~ ~ CP lEi : [Fl =mr 1 11 f 6.3- --1-/19- BILLI 71[q / 7. .~ _ - LE Â® n-11 El-*-99 --- Em T 0 CONC ' -0 -- 1 +~ - -1 H*-fi ~ 0 _ .._m _2 --.- -.- - LEVEL IA & 121-3 TO CONC - 'ii ~ ~- - .' ...= R ).1.-'..._a._-g . W . : 1 LEVEL 3L LEVEL 2 PATIO AREA = SHEET TITLE 6, ~1~~'--1187- 4- 171 , PROPOSED EXTERIOR m m . 1 11 1 ' r M T 0 CONC ~- ~ 2 -' FIR- 4-1 / -6 rl - 9 --1-1HH --ti 1- :- 12,-i 1 -I- : f. 3. i El 11 - - LEVEL 24 ELEVATIONS 111-6 | TO CONC , MT-.T 42 d 1 LEVEL 28__ -- - ~ - - f 7--'r--1087 --- ---~ ----- =M'~ 4 SCALEÂ· As indicated 1 U 1 Em - -4429-imm--13-381--Â·L- mn' 1-416 11 1 - 1 â‚¬ 9 - - PD4.1 0 CONC LEVEL l A TO CONC 7941' - 0" 100'01 GARAGE ENTRY J J J LEVEL 1&_ - -_ ----- -------- ------- MAINENTRY 5Â¤7'TÂ»"~0-'D -%.i-0-0.-ND--t < 2 j WEST EXTERIOR ELEVATION ' H EAST PROPERn LINE aN!1*183doMdiS- NORTHPROPERTYLINE (inONO,IVA313 0 3Nll ..3/0...1/0. IONOk30!3Nrl.Maaad HlneS ELEVATION ELEVATION OF )N OF MOST ROOF HEIGHT OVER ACTUAL ROOF HEIGHT YOR LABEL FINISHEDGRADE GRADE RESTRICTIVE TOPOGRAPHY OVER MOST RESTRICTIVE ATION 1 7942'-2 794. - 4 PROPOSED 7981 - 0' 38 - 10" 2 7941' - 9" 7942Â·.1 PROPOSED 7981' - 7 39-10- - rE 3 7941' - 7" 7942-1 PROPOSED 7981' - 0 39'-5 4 7941'-6 7942' - 1 PROPOSED 7981'-0 39 -6 5 7938'-11" 7939'-10 PROPOSED 7978' - T 39Â·-8 6 7938-9 7938'- 8 NATURAL 7978 - T 39-11' 7 7937-9 7937-10 PROPOSED 7977 - 0' 39Â· - 5 8 7937' - 11" 7939Â· - 6 PROPOSED 7971'- 5 33-6 9 7939'-10 NATURAL 7978Â· - 7 38'-9 rowland+broughton architecture / urban design /1/enor des,gn 10 7938' - 3 7940' -0 PROPOSED 7978 - 2 39'-11Â·Â· 11 7942 0 7942 - 21/4" PROPOSED 7981 -11Â·Â· 39-11" 234 e hopkins ave 1830 blake st ste 200 aspen, co 81611 denver co 80202 12 7943' - 0 7942'-10" NATURAL 7973-5 30-5 970 544 9006 0 303 308 1373 0 13 7941-10' 7943' - 1" PROPOSED 7976' - 2 34-4 970 544 3473 f 303 308 1375 f 14 7941' - 5 7943' - 4 PROPOSED 7974-5 33- 0' 15 7940' -10 7943' - 7 PROPOSED 7973-5 32- T 16 7944' - 2" NATURAL 7971' -10 27Â·- 8 17 7940' -10 7943 - 11' PROPOSED 7976-7 35 - 9" 18 7942Â· -2 7944' - 4" PROPOSED 7974Â· - 5 32'- 4 MATERIALS LEGEND 19 7946'-11' 7945' - 6' NATURAL 7976'. T 31.1 03 0-WIDE HORIZONTAL 20 79474 - 0 7945 -3 NATURAL 7973' - 5 28'- 2" WOODS~OING 21 7946 -10 7945 -1 NATURAL 7974-4 29' - 3" ID 14" ~DE HORIONTAL 22 7947Â· - 0 7944'. 11Â·Â· NATURAL 7976' - 2 31'-3Â· Consultants WOOD SIDING 23 7947Â· - 0 7944 - 4' NATURAL 7973' - 5 29'- 1 ~ 6Â· wIDE VERTiou 24 7943Â· - 9 NATURAL 7981 ' - 7Â·Â· 37.10 WOOD SiDING NATURAL 7981'-11" 37'- 10 25 7946' - 10' 7944Â· - 1" 26 7946' - 10 7943'-11" NATURAL 7983'- 9" 39' - 10" 27 - 7943Â· - 5 NATURAL 7981'-10 38 - 5 28 - 7943 - 4 NATURAL 7982' - 0" 38'-8 STONE VENEER 29 - 7943 -10 NATURAL 7983' - 9" 39'-11 30 7943 - 11 NATURAL 7981Â·-10 38'-11" 31 7942-10 NATURAL 7982Â· - 3 39' - 5 32 7939' - 6" NATURAL 7978' - 7 39' - 1" * 1 0 WOOD SLATS 33 7942 . 0 NATURAL 7981'-7" 39' - 7" 34 7943'- 6 NATURAL 7971 -10' 28' - 4" Issue : y Ila POINT FROM Â» ~ 0714 2015 DETAILED FIREPLACE FLUE-~ FIREPLACEFLUE-~ I REVIEW ~ EAVE TO RIDGE APPLICATION -Rown= 1/2 POINTFROM ~ EAVE TO RIDGEA ~ ~ABANAS (TEMP/MOVABED> M T- ~M\\4, ~p ~T O CONC DECK FFIREPLACE FLUE 2 12 1/2 POINT FROM 1/2 POINT FROM GLASS GUARDRALL EAVE TO RIDGE EAVE TO RIDGE 17 TO CONC 2 C~-' - ~~ 12' 294- I ~3 T O CONC i_3-3Ff>13~131-0 - ~GUSSGUARDN~- - ---~~~ _ ROOF DECK A A . . . 1 ROOF DECK A _ ~ _ 17 - - 34.-G-- 4 140-9' 7 ' # ' 4 7 140'-9- 4/. 1 ------3 11 \LE 12 4 17 #9004 19[*W#] 1 i '11-11-- WTB=--3-'fli B-_Elm_t-- 1]9 21'111 !=PEFE J~I1~41'I._:Â£O.u rE,p 5"521--,--24: -2. M 22+ R 3 7 -=- ,~ 21-4- TO CONC 1 u ill: - .-Iiâ€ž4,1,=-4= - - , , ~3-I | --~~-3'4821 ~9~5 i-4-=9,16* t-e- 11 ' 1 LI I I]' ~ *f Uftflfr=gligiall- - . 6 LEVEL IA__ ~ 3 -11â‚¬i~ -*1- ----* ---13 --fil.--*--I.- - Fil - ~ -FS --- --0-1-- --E-- LEVELIA 1 . T 0 CONC Â¥ 131%0" ' = ._-1-III 0 = .1 ,-EEE ~ FIFI 133----E'ENU @PER, ~ Fll <PEEUPX,1 99 711 *-4-4- -mil 33=- m ' 0,4- 08 83-7 TO CONC LEVEL JA 1 . & 1 ~ 1~V~L 3/L , 4 - f: 2. :0---p = 1./:"99 98/2RY 1314" v T O CONC i i !~ 4 4 1 . 1 1 1+ 4 2 7 i. IME.~ * ' ' ..--je- --2+~ft- 1213"7 ~ 5~ 331 FIELI ' mm~ 9~-" [RE [8[R 2 7 MIL- 21 71@1 22 211 3 1 f- < ~21.1 .al[ 104-11,01 11 ' m .111 .01 1-Â·Â£I=1===-flirl~61=..... . - -6 '" 1 -1 31 -mmi-iq-Â» A GLASS GLASS I GLASS 1 - 1.5 Z~,1 L./.16*/ + T 0 CONC TO CONC . 1 -T - ~ ~ -~ :/ 2 LEVEL ZA 1 ' ~ 4 LEVEL 2, i =-TEl-:t. q.1-/09 UaL.119 - '3"ZEE!~~ th,2 tijep- 1--1 tri + : 1 1 7 1114 - ' -4Â£.1 L_ u 4-- .1 6 T f-1,- _ - 111'-6" f , Peril LE[-m mm mm mm 1-7 0113 pllm E[Im-- mor -33 1-1 '3]ECI -El[B r <N- -- - - -- - -4- - ' N 'N N TO CONC '.lill- -N HN ~N , 1 LEVEL 1 A N N TO CONC _LEVEL 1A 1 . . ------ ----------------------I-~-~----- 100-0" 7 . Â¥ 100'-011 ASPEN ALPS ACCESS/DRIVEWAY (SOUTH ELEVATION) ~ 1 ~ SOUTH EXTERIOR ELEVATION C P[)4.2/ SCALE 3/32" = 1'-0 SKY HOTEL 709 E DURANT AVE. FIREPLACE FLUE & GENERATOR EXHAUST7 TRELUS BEYOND ~ELEVATOR OVERRUN ~MECH ASPEN. CO 81611 ~FIREPLACE FLUE GLASS GUARDRAIL ~ - rn ]-ailyEV TO CONC 4 1%~JECKA ______ ~-- Â»ALL_. 4' - ~ ------- TOCONC ROOFDECKS 1 . . 137-9- 7 . 12' , TOCONC ~ ~- ~4' ~5 -r-~flil-lrn__ lef -7 ~3 Full 1 111*lt 'rpl ''TTIT'%1 E-Trlin = p-1 Â·Â·~irr 1. 71-1 itilÂ» i , - 2 1 # fI)[0/ 1 LEVEL-3.A- ----------- ------- 1 ---1~= PI*-1 - 1. 1.1,-Irth: TO CONC Â¥ 131'-or -2 m -1 -1 11 2 11 ; 1 4 /1 'f ' ' b : uumm _1 3 - _LEVEL 48 6 . "2:'i li -tf. Im m:,I.L --6 128 0 T TO CONC el LEVEL 3A t-=r r'11 13-U~ -- #1 WEEUEal [33 4 CD - ~ ~ TO CMC Â¥ 121'-3 271 1 m[Il .7-3 P] I AÂ«Ur-#14+*125 33 '-' i mm 0, --TEM" LEVEL 3B PROJECT NO _ _ _1 1* 3- --- - i 9 1 -' 1 118'-3 N CD 21406.60 TO CONC 1 LEVEL 2/ , r 1- -6.-=til LEVELZe 1 . SHEET TITLE Â¥ 111Â·-8-- -51:r-- - -p_~TE U 1 - Luit -01*t~41'M- -WÂ·~19~VI'#.i ba TO CONC 1 , 108.-61 7 --I - * 4 ..-'d-lt- f - i PROPOSED EXTERIOR 94.31 --EFFId*449* El [-1 Elt J[J ELEVATIONS -tru-7 1 - - dz=El,J --f TO CONC . 1 LEVEL lA _ _ _ _ _ _ 1 ------ - ---------- -------- --- - --- - TO CONC Â¥ 100Â·-oF- U. .1 '91 - LEV~/ ~8 ~ ~, ~ FOREGROUND ELEVATION -~7 - ~- --- ----~--~-----~- ---- - --- F~- SCALE As indicated BEYOND ALLEY ELEVATION .~~, ORIGINAL STREET (EAST ELEVATION) PD4.2 < 2 ~ EAST EXTERIOR ELEVATION SCALE 3/32"= 1-0 i 5.. ./Int 9 - ViESTPROPERTY"PE SOU~H PROPERTY LINE 31â€¢r AlM3dC)Md Iilk*JN 9 9. , 91-9 F-P, LANDSCAPE GUAIUNTEE: THIS GUARANTEE IS TO COVER THE COST TO STABILIZE THE ENTIRE STTE WITH N'Â»Â·** ;Â® 6 VEGETATION (FOR EXAMPLE, SHOULD THE PROJECT FALL THROUGH, THE CITY HAS THE RESOURCES TO DURANT STREET STABILIZE THE SITE AND THE CITY IS NOT LEFT WITH AN UNSTABLE, DIRT LOT). rowland+broughton architecture / urban de/gn / inte'or design 234 e hopkins ave3 1830 blake st, ste 200 aspen, cc 81611 denver. co 80202 LEGEND 970.544 3473 f 303 308 1375 f 970.544.9006c 303.308.1373 0 FACE OF CURB SYMBOL MATERIAL,/PRODUCT AREA UNIT COST TOTAL COST PROPERTY LINE U ON-SITE, GRASS SEED 34,202 SF $1.50/SF $50,077 AND TEMPORARY IRRIGATION ON-SITE, 6" TOPSOIL 34,202 SF $35/TON $6,470.10 Consultants 1 r ~~ ON-SITE, ASPHALT 2,845 SF $8/SF $22,760 ON-Srre, ASPHALT 1,800 SF $8/SF $14,400 ~ 300 s spAng ~ u PARKING bluegreen ALLEY CONNECTOR aspen, co 81611 970.429.7499 0 CHATEAU 970.429.9499 f DUMONT www.bluegreenaspen.com 1 NOTES 1. ASSUMES EXISTING BUILDING HAS BEEN REMOVED IN-FULL AND ROUGH GRADING IS IN APPROPRIATE CONDITION TO RECEIVE TOPSOIL. 2. OFF-SITE STABILIZATION IS NOT INCLUDED IN THIS GUARANTEE, PLEASE REFER TO PUBLIC FACILITIES AND ISSUE: PUBLIC INFRASTRUCTURE GUARANTEE AND STORM WATER + DRAINAGE GUARANTEE FOR ADDITIONAL 07.14.15 INFORMATION, DETAILED REVIEW APPLICATION 1 - -- -0 U f 1 1 1 1 4 1--- U _ 1 1 ALLEY 1 GLORY HOLE CONDOMINIUMS 11 1 SKY HOTEL = 709 E. DURANT AVENUE | ASPEN, CO 81611 --- -- ~PROPERTAIRiE -------~ I. - . ---- 15ia / ~ NORTH / 0 - DWG FILE: PROJECT NO: 05' 1 21406 40 101 BG L SERIES SKY HOTEL.dwg \ 'd>Of~ / 1 , ASPEN ALPS CONDOMINIUMS SHEET TITLE i LANDSCAPE GUARANTEE PLAN 1 Â£ \ 1 - i SCALE o 8 16 -- PRELIMINARY ===7--0- NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION K C KLEIN COTE EDWARDS CITRON LLC E C ATTORNEYS HERBERTS. KLEIN* hsk@kceclaw.com 101 SOUTH MILLSTREET LANCE R COTE PC'â€¢ cote@kceclaw.com SUITE 200 JOSEPH E. EDWARDS, 111, PC* jee@kceclaw.com ASPEN, COLORADO 81611 KENNETH E. CITRON ... kcitron@kceclaw.com TELEPHONE: (970)925-8700 MADHU B. KRISHNAMURTI mbk@kceclaw.com www.kceclaw.com *also admitted in Hawaii .. also admitted In California ... also admitted in New Yorkand Ma5sachusetts August 13,2015 Via Email iessica.garrow@citvofaspen.com Planning mid Zoning Commission, City of Aspen c/o Jessica Garrow City o f Aspen Community Development Department 130 S. Galena Street, 3rd Floor Aspen, CO 81611 Re: Sky Hotel - Planned Development Detailed Review Application Dear Commissioners: As you probably recall, my office represents the Chateau Chauniont Condominium Association ("CC"). My office previously represented but no longer represents Chateau Du Mont Condominium Association ("CD"). Duringthe City Council's review ofthe Planned Development Project Review, Conceptual Commercial Design Review, GMQS Review for Lodging and Affordable Housing, Timeshare Review, Subdivision Review, Conditional Use Review, Special Review, and Right-Of-Way Vacation Ordinance Amendments application ("Project Review Application") filed by the Sky Hotel, the CC determined to remain "neutral" as to the Project Review Application and did not oppose (and is not now opposed to) the final building plans submitted by the Sky Hotel with the Project Review Application. For tlie reasons discussed below, CC is not neutral, and is, in fact, opposed to the Construction Management Plans ("CMP") which has been submitted as a part of the Sky Hotel Planned Development Detailed Review Application ("Detailed Review Application"). There are four separate problems with the CMP. While we understand that you are not generally tasked with review of the details of CMPs because those plans are subject to review by the City Engineer, we believe you do have some authority in this circumstance because Ordinance 39 (Series of 2014) ("Ord. 39") (which approved the Project Review Application) specifically required the Sky Hotel to include a draft CMP in the Detailed Review Application for your consideration. See Ordinance 39-2014, Sections 7c and 9.4. While we do not expect that you will review any engineering-related details, some of the broad concepts discussed below are properly subject to your review. By way of context, this neighborhood is configured in an unusual manner because it involved multiple vacations of rights of way and because the sole access for most of the CC units . Planning and Zoning Commission August 13,2015 Page 2 (and for most of the CD units) is from Dean Street (or the "Block 107 Alley," as it is labeled in the Detailed Review Application). While this is not ideal, it has been this way since the CC project was constructed and since the CC condominium map was recorded in 1971. Also, except for a very small underground garage, the only off-street parking for CC is four parallel spaces on CC property along the north side of Dean St. Dean Street is only 20 feet wide. As was acknowledged in prior public hearings by Sky Hotel representatives, the owners of units iii CC have a prescriptive easement across Sky Hotel property between the existing Sky Hotel and the CD building from Durant Ave. to Dean St. ("Easement"). Attached is a copy of the proposed Sky Hotel Construction Management Site Logistics Plan that is Appendix B to the proposed CMP ("CMP Map"). The area of the Easement is highlighted in yellow on the CMP Map. Historically, all vehicular traffic to Dean St. has traveled in a one-way nianner from Durant Ave., across the Easement to Dean St. and then along Dean St. to Original St. The four problems with the Sky Hotel's draft CMP are access, the tower crane, traffic flow and the lack of a schedule. Each is discussed below. Access The CMP proposes to eliminate the right of CC init owners and rental guests to use the Easement for access to or from Dean St. and to CC. Specifically, the CMP proposes that the City agree to allow the Sky Hotel to close off the western end of Dean St. where the Easement and Dean St. intersect so that the Sky Hotel can have exclusive use of this portion of the public right of way and all of the Easement. The portion of Dean St. that the Sky Hotel proposes to take exclusive control over is highlighted in pink on the CMP Map. The Sky Hotel proposes that construction and emergency vehicle traffic flow in the opposite direction from the historical traffic flow; in other words, from Original St., along Dean St., to the Easement and to Durant Ave. Further, the Sky Hotel proposes that non-emergency and non-construction traffic enter Dean St. from Original St., negotiate a turn-around (the location of which is not specified) and then exit Dean St. at Original St. In otlier words, the Sky Hotel proposes to turn most of Dean St. into a two-way traffic area. As mentioned above, Dean St. is 20-feet in width and is the sole access for most of the CC and CD units. Pedestrian access must therefore be protected from and separated from the construction and other traffic proposed for Dean St. The draft CMP does not address pedestrian traffic on Dean St. (See Section 7, CMP). Regardless of this omission, it will be necessary for the Sky Hotel to construct a pedestrian walkway along Dean St. from Original St. to at least the CD courtyard and entrance area. Section 21.12.180 of the Municipal Code requires the City Engineer to protect the safety and welfare of the public and to conform to the Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices (MUTCD). In the context of temporary traffic controls, the MUTCD Section 6B.01.2.E. states, "Bicyclists and pedestrians, including those with disabilities, should be provided with access and reasonably safe passage through the TTC zone." (The "TTC zone" is the Planning and Zoning Commission August 13,2015 Page 3 "temporary traffic control zone.") Moreover, Ord 39 states that pedestrian and vehicular traffic "shall be distinguished" in the alley. "Reasonably safe passage" and prudent protection of the safety and welfare of pedestrian traffic within a narrow (20-foot wide) right of way where two- way traffic and construction traffic is proposed means that it will be necessary for the Sky Hotel to construct a pedestrian walkway from Original St. along Dean St. to the entry areas for CC and CD. I measured the width o f tlie existing pedestrian access walkway existing today along Hunter between Hyman Ave. and the Block 95 alley; and that walkway is five feet, seven inches in width. Dean St. is 20 feet wide. Once a pedestrian walkway is constructed in Dean St., there will only be 14 feet, five inches available for the proposed two-way traffic - this is traffic for CC rental guests and owners, construction traffic, emergency vehicular traffic (potentially including fire trucks and ambulances),ancl commercial delivery traffic (e.g., Federal Express, UPS, taxi drop off of guests to CC or CD, and delivery or maintenance vehicles). Fourteen feet, five inches is not a sufficient width for two-way traffic of these types of vehicles and thus does not provide a reasonable access to CC i f free and unfettered use of the Easement is taken from CC as is proposed by sky Hotel. Colorado case law provides that a municipality may relocate, close or alter streets, alleys and rights of way so long as adjacent private property retains reasonable access. If the access is not reasonable or is substantially damaged, the municipality can relocate, close or alter the right of way only after just compensation to the land owner. In this case, there is no proposal to compensate CC for the taking ofthe Easement rights or the closure of the Dean St. as proposed by the Sky Hotel. Nor is there any proposal to compensate the owners of the CC small lodge apartments for what will undoubtedly be their very significant loss of income from their rental of such apartments, by granting a very significant benefit to the Sky Hotel. Consequently, approval of the Detail Review Application would constitute your approval of a proposed inverse condemnation of the current access to CC. This would be an abuse of your discretion. Tower Crane Tlie CMP Map illustrates a "Tower Crane" in the corner of the "L" shaped construction site. In conversations with Sky Hotel representatives, CC objected to the swinging of the crane above the CC. Sky Hotel representatives indicated that the crane will swing over the CC but will be "unloaded" when it does so. The invasion of the airspace of another property owner without permission is a trespass and is against the law. The Sky Hotel has not sought and does not have permission of the CC Owners' Association or the individual owners of units within CC to trespass in CC airspace. Presumably, such permission has not yet been obtained from other adjacent land owners. It would be an abuse of your discretion to purport to grant an approval of a plan that indicates an intent to commit an illegal act. Traffic Flow Ord. 39, Section 9.5, "Traffic Flow" states, "The alley direction shall remain the same as today - entry from Durant and exit on Original." The CMP purports to completely close the entry from Durant Avenue and thereby completely shut down traffic over the easement from Durant Planning and Zoning Commission August 13,2015 Page 4 Avenue to the alley and the west end o f the alley, and also to change the traffic flow on the eastern portion of the alley throughout the period of construction, which according to Sky Hotel representatives willlikely be at least 20 months. This is in direct violation of Ord. 39. One ofthe criteria by which P&Z is required to review the Detailed Review Application is consistency with the Project Review approval. See Â§26.445.070A, Land Use Regulations. It would be an abuse of your discretion to approve a Detailed Review that proposes a CMP directly iii violation of the Project Review approval. Schedule Because of the unique circumstances of the neighborhood, Ord. 39 requires that the Sky Hotel provide a draft CMP for your review. The City's CMP Requirements Manual requires a schedule and description of dates of construction. Under Title 21 of the Municipal Code, there are strict limits on the use of the City's rights of way at different times of the year. For example, the placement of pedestrian barricades within streets and alleys is prohibited from November 1 through March 31. This means that Dean St. must operate iii a one-way fashion during this time period each year. Also, Ord. 39 provides that the most disruptive work in Dean St, (utility excavations) shall be limited to April 15 through Julie 15 and October 1 through November 20. In conversations with Sky Hotel representatives, it has been asserted that the utility installation work in Dean St. will be performed from May tlirough July 3 of 2016. Without a schedule it is impossible to know whether the Sky Hotel's Detailed Review application complies with the requirements of Ord. 39. For the above reasons, we respectfully request that you deny the Detailed Review Application. Very truly youts, KLEIN COTE EDWARDS CITRON LLC - -il Cric/, C,Cli.Icr- 2*Jt4*flf-> ~ Jose~i-J. Edwards, III / CC: Chateau Chauniont Board of Directors Tricia Aragon, City Engineer John Sarpa Gideon Kaufnian Sunny Vann Micliael C. Ireland, attorney for Chateau Du Mont Owners' Association Construction Gate #2 - Exit i / GEN[RAL,IN,TYNOTES - Point (with flagger) ~ w.-i.r...-i,(Â»Uâ€¢,Iffâ€¢..' '1(,â€¢ 2*.~vre,2Â¤timre'rt,r.U-9 : Limit of Disturbance / 0 3 2 .Â£ rr Construction Fence with -- ' ----*|---|-|--7-'.- 5 4 Screening \1 -"'-.,4 \ 0 ....Â£.t ...~.....4.-'....,1........â„¢~.WL'.4.,r.,0.....- 6,-- idi ''01.0 , .. / :' - Plme-ROVIMINTSNOTEÂ· - 1111.... - ' -Il---*0-_ __MI_____.-'I , i --- I 1881 LOW Unl lTv Norrs 1 ConÂ«ete k - -__- _- 1 W..th fiw im - -i Z or g /4?r '2783 A + Dulâ€¢,P-1 - 1 aRmE_M'EacÂ° 0 2 Ad 1 :=C-*.*b j --I--'ll- 1 U~ 1 19 27&:. i 1. 9 6192 E Job Tom:i Construction Gate #1 - UTUTIMANIFIF~ M . .. Â£ 1 f . 0-â„¢1 ouuÂ».0/1 ~006l 211 1 "Ait" Entry Point (with flogger) ~~~~ .. 11...4.0 --,7 ' -7\ " 1 :- i * 14,1 6 1*TÂ¢:Mer ': i ------- AaeÂ« Into Chartâ€¢au, 13.,11 [me,gencv Egresst i . - -- _ 0 -4;.4 E rem.,inopen 2 0 Acceu Gate 1 1 -" i ' t.,11, 6 r i 1 4/1 --] 1 ~ M. â€¢., â€¢ 1'=/*IM.I. j 1 Jr Crane ' Turn jiound~ .'i 1 - --- 6 :rf#%*bir...u -\. Location TOD ,â€ž1%-.-6.- -2-~-4< ~ Entry Point 4 -...I- 4 .271 -k , - ,---- - fwith flagger) ~ 1.~Ory MO. CONDO.~NIUMs Y Arc â€¢15â€¢,M < 4 / 2--- ---.......--. 1 5,(rC,1. MOLOING*-IliD -1â‚¬0 Drli MN â€¢]U>C ~ Emergenâ‚¬y Egre~WAIÂ©55 C.ate} . L h W 3 UJ - MMÂ· 1~Ift,$)IN i 2 . 0 9,2 Fencebarrier will be adju:trd 1 - -- ' I ..A. for ROW work as needed ~ : 5 61 ~Surfo~eparatlefparkinfl to~ f . be turned overta Owner , Sky Hotel *y Â¥2 1 approx 10 mor,th. into t.0 0 9 ron,t,1,&011 Construction Management Construction Parking k Off Site at Site Logistics Plan Snowmass Intercept Lot- Shuttle c...â€¢Ill ~Alt i Service shall be provided by *ALWAL--# "-222~ZÂ·* Maselder, forall Subs Haselden Construction IW,m, 04. 51â‚¬l' C i A. I. 1./. 1:ollor,Wls:,00 ' %347 lt,Prdna -9 j 0 OM? YÂ¥*1 0 - 0)117- /*(Pr) . Chateau Dumont Condominium Association August 13, 2015 Aspen City Council This letter confirms that the Chateau Dumont HOA supported and remains in support of the application by Sky Hotel for a development approval as granted by the City of Aspen, Ordinance 39, adopted on February 9, 2015 as represented through its attorney, Michael C. Ireland on the night of adoption at the public hearing. Sincerely, 9-\3~t--u < ~ James Valerie l~y~ As VP for Chateau Dumont Condominium Board of Directors Aspen City Clerk RECEIVED AUG 1 3 2015 MEMORANDUM TO: Jessica Garrow CC: Scott McHale, John Sarpa FROM: Sunny Vann, Vann Associates, LLC RE: Sky Hotel Detailed Review Application DATE: August 7, 2015 1. As a result of Jim Pomeroy' s comment number 5 in the Sky Hotel DRC Comments summary, Scott McHale has recalculated the project's basement floor area pursuant to Section 26.575.020.D.8. ("garages that are part of a subgrade area") of the Regula- tions. Based on the provisions of this section, 789 sq. ft. of the subgrade basement counts as floor area. 2. Sheet PDO.5, Proposed Floor Area Calculations, in Exhibit 2, Appendix B of the Detailed Review application depicts 219 sq. ft. of garage sub-grade floor area. This figure was excluded from both the Non-Unit and Cumulative floor areas depicted in Table 1, page 3, of the application. As a result, the project' s corrected non-unit floor area is 14,421 sq. ft. and its cumulative floor area is 92,116 sq. ft. 3. The approved Project Review application's cumulative floor area was 91,552 sq. ft. which included 254 sq. ft. of garage non-unit floor area. 4. When corrected pursuant to Section 26.575.020.D.8., the Project Review non-unit and cumulative floor areas total 13,970 sq. ft. and 92,087 sq. ft., respectively. 789 sq. ft. - 254 sq. ft. = 535 sq. ft. 13,435 sq. ft. + 535 sq. ft. = 13,970 sq. ft. 91,552 sq. ft. + 535 sq. ft. = 92,087 sq. ft. 5. With the corrected sub-grade calculations, the difference between the approved Project Review and Detailed Review application's cumulative floor areas is 29 sq. ft. d:\oldc\bus\notes\mem60814.112 1 -1 SPACE 00 0 n.2 /002 1-- .1.+ 1 +4 1 .p ... 0.-,~U., la/02,5 L'-jit-r~ 1, C.0/ L[Â©0. '1'...t'.AAE rE 11 +-- 1 y.+1+ 1 'i -/.a .20...,l-2 OUT -ACE [U 132 7-: -:~;tIMeÂ·~ aid â€¢pegle..'.& %+Me Â¥Z~!Wfu,= 2211Â£ -1424 - .2,4..t J'.. f UMTSPACE (L) . LODGE rowlandâ€¢broughton 92122 1~,2.11>- [r'--...1L.' -*- ----,p- 0 LOOGE w A 7 6 11Â£72-u'l cr 'tlP J '; LOO<le .4,â€ž,4'.. .1-,14â€¢ NONUMT (UCiAH) -1 61 Â® $12 - 0 22Â§11[ (1.1 NET} 1Â»1%3\1 lillillillit - 3 1 - 1 1 1 Ft.:Â°*1:. inillillillillik NON Um + |1Â·Â»+-rl*~Â·1--~+4+4+~+40~#AL " UM LODGE PARK~G MONq -Er - 11 ..1 UNIT SPACE 0.1 12295/ // 1 111~1 -i- -+IÂ· -411-1 -Fi-'-aliEW,â€¢NET; Mnat 4-4/ 1 * 1 "N .6422-1 221= 4,1 N-3 L//"E /LZÂ£ e -ED *s=41 1 1=.15 .061.1, le,2 644 NER ~ PROPOSED BASEMENT LEVEL FLOOR AREA CALCULAT~04 /Th PROPOSED lEVEL ONE FLOOR AMEâ€¢ CALCwAnON - 07'4 XC'/ DETARFD NON-UNIT..AH) APPLICATION REVIEW 2 1 LODGE 13UE (*05 NE-, LODGE 12/1/Et"a NE'.- -1 78 5- .* ...E Bul ORADEnASE~MT WALLE,Voll,â€¢LE SF CALCULATIONS t....ET) ./ UNIT SPACE {U 440.4_1 ~. in_of ...9 .....AE 22Â£ys.d. -*. f# 12112 1-,+IEW ~--4 L-ZZL 23-- i .31* mut .., 7..4 , T *r- ~impzamit LODGE 21122('20"CT) --4 1 J .I'. 4 -1 11 mo,i~Uce..13*2â€¢ 2*AlÂ·SE<2442 NET) -41 11 .0-4 LODGE ~ ~ LODGE 1,1 1:.Â·t'.1 J 1111-2Et,202 NE n 22Â¤Â·2Â£1'933 NET) Â»~a~ ~ Â® splks'REET mEIT ELEVA,loN) ~ SOUTHWEST DIAGONAL LON/ UNITwÂ£'(W 0 '.,;-* , T ERUE 079' NE 1) lan:E NON-U~ar a.,C'AH, NO*UNIr {WAH) 1 L--4 LODGE UNIT LOÂ©GE LOON UNIT 4 'l/# NONÂ·UMT (LOAH} MEBO. ug,Â£ 21&Â£ -Zi-Â»4+L 1--- 1--2-0"",-, 21112 '2000/ED ULILLI,- It,1 4 .uz ..O.4... ufA Mt' .0Â·Â·OR'=.f An. 'I. ' 11*21 LODGE Â© SOUTHEAST 01.00144 0 ASPEN ALPS ACCESS SCITH ELEVATION, 111.2 m&â€ž >'4+41' '14*~ij., j~,i 'ti,$"in ' Â·0 5 u,0000.r INT SPACE 04 L- 4 + , 1--1-, 245.,_.~1-'~ms#" im.2 LODGE Â» 122,21,-1 NET) Â»' 21!12 (1079 NET) .00(02 UNIT 3* LOCOE z=11Â£ ' e " 4- 't r m ~1 - - - M aelt ./.GE (,000 NETI ~37///Ltqid--T,i- 12-/m/:///,~. SKY HOTEL (Â»UNET} zinlf /737 â€¢En .-' WicÂ»Om. -V ./.CAAZZ* U.A Z 44 - /'TN ORIOINAL STREET ;E.3, â€žEVAnON, /'h AUEY iNORâ„¢ ELEVATION, ~Jh PROPCX1ED LELIL â„¢.O FLOOR HEA CALCUIT,ON r-Th PROPOSED LEVILâ„¢ REE FLOCR AREA CALCULAYIN U 7'De E. OURANT AVE .... CO./.1 LOOGE U. T lili lilli. Emit- WaFEZZZa IRM.2 \ .ted, I lÂ©Col /76' NET) :::i'-2 iii E= ....c~/IP,â€¢fl â€¢'/'S~ r il :5 = . ... ~ALLE,no,IME,El /71 Aurv,sOUTH ELEV) U CÂ»fe=123 , 1; Rif= LOOGE UNIT i , 3 ; 1.10 41 , TT... r - *E/////*L*- 212,2 1 4. 1.- 111 J -- ~ 1 h- L ..14 =422 All. 1 00 . C,OURANT AVE, (NORTH ElEV~ 1 ./W.'/10 NON-UNIT i'./.AH} 22.2.2 TERRACE , ~-~-- ~~~5~ - - - 87â€¢22SSFEJU'OGEOGAMAGEDOORÂ·WALL~1S0O78F~4~1.LAREA- 0238 OR 2 38% ...â€žIr SuaGRADE *REA CALCULATIONS m i .12 Ill 01 LODGE UbiT "6 t-Â·--Â·~~Â·i-- =Â»-El :AL= rit ,-31 &?#tfl. rn-v--~W- - .. 33.0.-500-3)1.6,6.8[.ENTÂ·9/381-7090FTOCOUNTTO/LOORAIE,4 PROPOSED FLOOR LOÂ©02 lÂ»*T 13]WINET, (PER SECTION 26575 0200.7 OARAGES & CARPORTS. MIXEDUSE PROJECTS ITHRES,DENT,AL AREA CALCULATIONS 1[ UNITS 280 SF OF GARAGE PER RESIDENCE IS EXCLUDED FROM FLOOR AREA CAiCULATION' 1 (185*NET) PROJECT HAS O)AH UNIT lâ€¢[SIDEN Ilil THU,3 Soo SF EXCLUDED THEN PER DECTION 1 f. 62--M---7- lauÂ£ MlINET I 28575020.08 SUBORADE OARAGES THE GARAOE EXEMPTION IS TAKEN FROM THE tOTAL #CALE W ""4'04- CROSS ILI//GRADE AREA PRICÂ« TO CALCULATING THE SUBGRACE EXEMPT)21, LOCGE LIT 4 L_.11 500 8, EXEMPT TME N FACU T HE TOTAL SUBORADE GROSS SE, 102 PDO.5 1 05>4 NET, .1 /7', PROPOIDLE,EL,OUI FLOCM AREACALCUITION /7% PROP"ED MOOF LEVE' 400* Aâ€¢EACICULATION 9--ft-,2.463# 11 U 1 --- -- ' ~ COMMERCIAL ENERGY EFFICIENCY 1 -4 0 i, 4 ~ tance or R-value of the msulatlng Inatenal Installed câ€žntlnu ance with the U-, F- and C:- facters in Tables (402.1.3 an 1 - Â·" 'i 1 Â· ously within or on tho below- grade exterior walls of the C402.1.4 and the maximum allowable fenestration areas iii , ~ building envelope required iIi accordaIlee with Table Section 4402.4.1. i ;1 C,402.1.3 shall extend to a depth of not tess than 10 feet (3048 A +B+CrD+Eâ‚¬ Zelo (Equation 4-2, .1... r mm) below the outside fitiished hiÂ·ound Jevel. orto the Ievel of 11Â¥41' the lowest floor of the conditioned space enclosed by tile where: ./ below grade wall, whicheveris less, Opaque swinging doors A = Sum ofthe (IJA Dif) valucs foreaclidistinct assembl) a; shall comply with Table C402.1.4 and opaque roll-op or slid- type of the building thermal envelope, other than slabs .9. ing doors shall comply with Table C402.1.3. on grade lind beloÂ·w-grade wails. . 1 C402.1.4 Assembly 0-factor, C-factor or F-factor-based UA Dif . lA Proposed - I LA Table. Mi method. Building thermal envele,re opaque assemblies UA Proposed = Proposed U-value Â· Area. intended to comply on an Assembly U-, C or F-factor basis Table 8402.1.4) Â· Area. UA Table = (U-factorfrom l'able (402.13 or ~3 i shallhave a U-, C- or F-factor not greater than thai sped fied in Table Â£402.1.4. Commercial buildings or portions of B = Sum of the (FL DIE) values for each distinct slab-on- / 11: comtnercial buildings enet.using Group R occurancies shall grade perimeter condition of the buitding thermal 9 use the U-, C-or F-factor from the "Group R" column of envelope. li l'able C402.1.4. Commercial buildings or portions of com- FL Dif = FL Proposed - FL Table ' - mercial buildings enclosing occupancies other than Group R shalluse the U-, C- or F-factor from Ibe "All other'- column F[. Proposed = Proposed F-value Â·Perimeter length. - of Teble (402. t.4. The C-factor for the bejow-grade exte- IiI. Table . (F-factor specified in Table (402.1.4) riot walls of the building envelope, as required in accor- Â· Perimeter length. dance with Table (402.1.4, sball extend to a depth o f 10 feet C = Sum of the (CA Dif) values for each distinct below- (3048 mm) below the outsidefinished groundlevel, orto the grade wall assembly type of the building thermal level ofthe lowest floor, whicheveris less. Opaque swinging envelope. ' doors shall comply with Table (402. I.4 and opaque roll-up CA Dif = CA Proposed -CA Table orsliding doors sliall comply with Tale C402.1.3. CA Proposed = Proposed CÂ·value Â· Airit. 1 (402.1.4.1 Thermal resistance of cold-formed steel CA Table = (Maximum allowable C-factor ~ walls. f/-factors of walls with cold-fomied steel studs specitied in Table (402.1.4) Â·Area. shall be permitted to be de[ennined in accordance with + 1 Equation 4-1 : Where the proposed vertical. glazing area is less than or U = 144+ (ER)] (Equation 4-1) tion (402.4,1, the value of D (Excess Vertical Glazing equal to the maxiinum vertical glazing area allowed by See- ' where: Value) sholl be zero. Otherwise: R, = The cumulative R-viue of tile walt components D = (IDA Â· UV) - (DA Â· Uwan), but not less than zero. iÂ· i along the path of tieat tran*fer, excluding Mic DA - (Proposed Vertical Glazing Area) - cavity insulation and steel studs. (Vertical Glazing Area allowed by ER = The effective R-value of the cavily insulation Section C4O2.4.1). with steel studs, UA Wall = Sum of tile (UA Proposed) values for each opaque assembly of the extetier TABLE C402.1.4.1 Â·i u EFFECTIVE R-VALUES FOR STEEL STUD WALL ASSEMBLIES walt. ; ~ NoM]NALI ikixawN I CAVITY ~ CORRECTI~ EFFECTWE ~ LIwn[L , Area-weighted average U-value of all STUD OF i R-VALUE FACTOR I R-VALLE(ER) 1 above-grade wall aq,emblies, | DEPTH FRAMING ~ (inches) ~ (ina.hes) | (insulat~ (F) _-i~~'y R-Vajue x Fui UAV = Sum of the (IjA Proposed) values for 1 6 -19_1296 1 738 1 each vertical glazing assembly. 3'4 | 16 r 1122 -ITs -1 IJV - UAV/total vedkal glazing area 1 ~--~13~~-0.55 I 715-1 . ' 2-1-1 -1-liunt-29*322*_22~ the skylight area allowed by Section (402.4.1. the value of E Where the proposed skylight area is less than or equal to 7.03 (Excess Skylight Value) shall be zero. Otherwise: L 1 L 16 _-44223*3-7332] E = rEA Â· us) - BA Â· upu, but not less than zero. ' 6 1 24 I__2_1-39 ME ~ F.A = (Proposed Skylight Area) _L_39 1 0.4~r- 9.03 (Allowable Skylight Area as specified I 1 16 l 2.5 -T Ejr-1--7.73 -1 in Section 24(>2.4.1). 1 8 2--243Â¤25110Â·38 122330--1 Uu . Area-weighted average U-value ofail i roof assemblies. ('402.1.5 Component performance alternative. Building UAS = Sum of the (UA Proposed)values for envelope values and fenestration are.as determined in accor each skylight assembly. I dance with Equation 4-2 shall be permitted in lieu of compli US = UAS/total skylight area. C-32 2015 INTERNATIONAL ENERGY CONSERVATION CODEÂ® ' COMMERCIAL ENERGY EFFICIENCY - - DE B 3 a 2.0 -2 8 43 3 3 11 22 21% f 2 0 97 2 1 4% y Ad A a 62 aa &*met d :M OB 1 4 & M Ad: M 0, 83 A ME? *. E:Â§ + 6 do 6368:63 8 CD M j 0% S k J ck ck b t a + N + g + Â·cs + M- P j %3 m 2 22 ZE 522,9 2 M + g 5- 1 27 14 3-04Â¤% 5 8 22 2 2 2; ok 02 8 5 @9= 3 22 SE =SEE 1 0 1 2 9 3 1 2 1 2 1 318 3 - 1-0, 4 M /4 2 05 & A & ok U b : 2 63 2 1% 64 49 43* 11 Z 4 M .4 04 01 0, M 8 U .-O + -8 + 10 : A = a g al li 6 2 1 1 2 = RE Wita ; i c 1 1% Ill '17 B 22 =E =22 2 4 = i a h - Â· N +'0 +.0 +Â·be ;543&*fil 1 11 RE. MM' 9 0 M X I I $ u I R; Â£ 12 8 68 63 696 Â¢ - 1 2 M M: @20< 42 04904 - 0, 1 ./ 01 3 - 9 1 13. 4 30 12 X 6 + 0 +06 2 32 â€¢ /06 I. 0'02 04 : 96 92 685 - 02 + a + 3 + 2 o & 12 m --111 E r4 2% 24/ A : 02 & ZeÂ· od a g 405 I - - co p 4 - 1 11 M - +5 00 m :323 di: P : 1 d & e E 9 - m Â¥ 13 R liE- 10 *i ; A 1 / 0, C;: 2 0~ L b. 02 2 +0 1 k 1:2 3.& lin P, 4 11 -2 & 4 1 -* t . F I F . 23 ! 1= 5/8 aia . z 2% = 3 Â£ 6 2 092 3 0 - S M l -13 ..5 +.8 + 2 0 07 29 049 z ~ Â¢2 9 14/Es C & 0, Al :02 02% 0,9/ d h Y El â€¢ 6-8 8 :: 8 02 m 1 % e ./ 2 ~ - 4 -t 3 4 2 M T A M / ,1 4 . m 82 I I M E - 2 5 1 - %93927*S-. 02 a N NI 5/ Â° R' ' . -0 N ./ d -1 G C -33 2015 INTERNATIONAL ENERGY CONSERVATION CODEÂ® OPAQUE THERMAL ENVELOPE INSULATION COMPONENT MINIMUM REQUIREMENTS, R-VALUE METHOD- ~ Allother | Group R All other ~ Group R All ether | Group R All other | Group R ~ All other ~ Groip R < All other ~ Group A ~8 other ~ UrouF P ~ -Alt A 62~ Insulation entrely R-2Dc-i R-25ci R-15ci -30:i i R-30ci R-3Dci R-35cÂ·i R-35ci R-33 R 35ei ~ IRIOE-2 1 30 J 2-1 10 15 0 A M 105 5 1-M 20; 61-ZI ~ JOJ 0 4 and other R=38 R. R-49 R49 R=49 R-49 R-49 i ' M :L *11 FL't-4 , fry'li ; 56 1"N ~ EL't-H | 51'Fl | St-'17- ~ SU!2Uf.'65noN LS k- 11 LS R.11 LS R-11 LS R-11 LS 15â‚¬cr R.15 fo R- 5 ~ NR NR | R-6 36 | 2-8.]d | R- Oci ~ m ~ R-:Dei ~ K 12.21 ~ K 12.501 J & 12.Sci 1 2-Mci | R-L6.76 | R-1 , 1 R-16 '<\Imoozuol *uoo [10 IsT Jo satpuT Et' pae KREOLUe.Â·. 1â‚¬9020 110 390110 30420 Z Â£ lu Pap,0.]2 X~lE?ued o paleo.leun 06 3 N..LA' 41, Below-grade wme ~ R | | R.7 ~ R.7.5ci ~ R--7.5ci | R-7.Sci | R- 1 1 R. 1 4 EXCEPT MARINE 5 AND MARINE 4 tÂ· I 2:OK) â€¢Tqi L m POI{12,0 JouEnd,fooo roloel-/7 241 ase 0 .... 410 'PIP./Ud .*, ITINS d RRJUds ~uu' scrly P./.410& S....t..J b uo e u .rotro/xe em mr,0 Admoo UNS snem @pul@-.Â£01@q '@PUS molog Ca squis palm[[ 4 : * pq â€ž,z ao,q .*Z 1 -q A I . 1/q i /1 '.quis Pal//H TABLE C402.1-3 Roofs Wa ! E low gra Ig ** 0 . X.i.nOnp/00 (lul.JI unmix'113 8 8[IMEN Sp.U')EUL] gl,T,0 j)@jILI 91 1003 0.5.0 4 spirad ozI ue:9 030(11 3<;U 51 1*fi.%1 {EUel= 4 2.IÂ©q . 2012 JDEpas 1009;0 10~4 0-Junbs iod spuood R.5.701' R-5. R 761 R-7.6 R 9.561 R 08 | NR R-30 | R 30 | 30 R-30 | R-30 1 R-30 | R-30' , =F lgf i./ 2of[Al/ goou opnpuF ?749 " "je 00'1111, 'LOU ;0 Jtkij .,e[[175 -wd,pu,Kd g SE-Not pele[r[Gat eq Iteq, SLUMS.Es enoj jeou Zows 7 CLIMA1 E ZONE framed aod 4 1 13 2234 sqets paluJtiCIA 01:04 20 mold:0697 ite/ aboweroof deck UQUE.501 Inoil COMMEACIAL ENERGY EFFICIENCY I. - -- 0 9 9 1 1 . -1 m h O d O D b 111 . 01 7, 0 @P * 22 f g f .i -5 9 fÂ¢1 111,1 11 '31 5 2 a : 9 2 W -, 5 43- 2 . 0* a' 0 2 x 1 -13-1 fii Al. I,ip# 0---2- 9/11Mly E 3-% 1 tie lili], V 0 ) . N 0 - 0 - 0 -6 m n ob E 331 ZE i D . I M 2. 1 8 6Â·1822 2 - 0'~"T'Â·"C 2 ON 3 & 9 0./..... I i _ 23-1 9 1 21 1 , â‚¬ iNHHAN I . 0 8 LL 0 1 . d I 3 m 11 k b UP.ON.f 0 [2 -6 / E . e C-34 2015 INTERNATIONAL ENERGY CONSERVATION CODEÂ® ~ All other Group R ~ All other ~ Group R ~ All otl~~~(;We~p ~ 11 other Group R cAllother ~ Group R ~ Allother < Group R Im'Oil | 550'0-n ~ Im 041 ~ 9500-n ~ goÂ·on ~ 490 -fl ~ +90-0-n ~ 17Â£00-n ~ W.0-0 -11 , 9Â£0Â·0-fl ~ 960-0-11 ~ 9Â£0 Oil ~ Â£80 0-1 ~ LOI 0-fl ~ JEE-011 ,ZE vide.~00 sf[1!,n uo uloisKS Ruippe,0 9[!7 Airprl~ox, 'uorlonns +00 241 pOpI.told '2010!UL:d @QUEL{s F X puiddv I-06 V 196 SV E.Og p....p.92.1274Â·1-y p....1/EJ-Â·7 qII5 p,1/21{Un /ql JO UOUBOI[ddu /qi Aq peian, ummop oQ UBHS SqETS 2311!24 IUS Ofqe; 291 Ut p>MENpm E.1O10Bj-j ;}B qi,2,~ 200ETIC]Illd/JO 00(IOF!Â·13 -J above roof deck U 0.039 U-0.039 80.039 ~ 50 039 C 0.039 U-0.032 U 0.032 U-0 032 U-0.028 U-0.028 U-,0.028 U-0.028 44 U-0035 U 0.0 5 U-0 035 ~U-00 5 U-0.035 If-Â·0 035 U 0 0.031 U-0 031 U-0.029 u.0029 U-0.029 U-0.029 U-0 027 U-0.0 7 U-0.027 ~ U 0..0 7 U-0.027 U-0.027 U-0, 27 3-0.027 021 ~ U-0.021 U.0 031 U-0.021 U-0.02] U-0.021 U-0.021 079 IT-0 079 ~ U-0 079 U-0.079 U 0 U-0.05 11-0.052 ~ U-0.052 U-0.052 U-0 052 U-0.052 U 0 052 U 0.039 U-0 052 00.039 framed U.0.077 L 0.077 U-0.077 TI-0064 U-0.064 U-0.0 U.Â·0.064 U-0.064 | U-0.064 U-0.064 U-0.057 U-0064 U-0-032 U-0.045 IJ-0 045 FEO- -fl ~ Â£Â£0Â·011 1 EEO 0-0 1 Â£60-0-fl l EED-Oil | EEGO-n | EGO 0-0 | EEO'O-fl | EED-0 n ~ Eâ‚¬0-0-0 1 Â£Â£00-Il EED 0-7 FEO 0 F â‚¬Eol}-51 -940Â·oil .990011 1 ~ 9 '01 59 0-,I < 55 0-3 85-0-.I 1 85'09 59'0-1 , 59'0-d ~ 59'0-d | 59-0 4 ~ OtÂ·{hi ~ 0Â£ 0-a ~ 06 thI | DL D-:I ~ 06 0-:1 | OL-0-Â·f ~ ,Sq.[9 P...Ii LE-0-fl 4 L 0-Ii ~~~f-FLI- 1 Leo-n | Lro-n | LEÂ·o-n g lyn ~ 19 O il ~ 19'D n | 19Â·0-fl ~ I 9-0-n | 19Â·0-0 ~ [9Â·0--0 1 [9Â·0-n ~ I9'011 ~ reinZoo #* ulog poi,CllqnS 10 01 pep[)13 gq 01 [>941[uipd aq Ili?[i~ uolern,UI En.CnINIUOO jO 211TBA-W JUJ. 1)011,U[JOCI 2(l ne'49 EgE,3 WLS V ql I 80 UE p.030U t. p.901 911+tâ‚¬92 UO p21<29 274-12 <141 OPAQUE THERMAL ENV S, U-FACTOR METHOD" 1 0 0-ti 1 01/0-3 0"0-:I ~ 55 0-:{ ~ 15 0-..I I /5-0-d ~ 1'& 0â‚¬ r *9'0 d tioul F Â©EL'0-d :ELÂ·Ou:{ ~ ,â‚¬L'0-:i ~ .ELÂ·0-U aEL 0-3 j .ELÂ·D-=1 6421~ pgwIFI Walls, below grade s.iool apei-/0-quIS goop enbedo Squrs 99]BON 10~ sluOUIa.Imba i .099 041 41 IM <TdwOO INIS SIP. 'Ped 110!09 'Op?.2 /*Otoq :ue squ!. %011'IC'/ [Ii'111000120-1 bm lou 92 /241 #Nosse 00 poseq an: S.ImoK[97 i)82 -4 '-3 @9041 Â·2 IUOUS <9 .19017 = 91 1[ion[=labi! 014 = MN tonty[Sui Nm2[HSV/ISNÂ¥ 11:04 .013.JU p. 9010*0 'SA.4Ll 4411,96â€ž1 'w/h 9I =10030,qu, jod punod I MA 881' - 3%; ma igd 37 xlpuadd V 1'06 VaNSI/HYZIHSWISNÂ¥ mog SIFInI? Copon.ascoo @ierd Uvul Sto [ low Nu,4210.# 1100 ZJ Â·'pn[/Ct T[P[IN i sloou CUMATEZONE 0-0.151 U-0.1 11-0.123 U.0.09 ~ U-0.090 [1-0.080 6-0 071 U-0.071 C-0.061 U.0.061 U 0 061 de wall' I C.J.MOL (1 140' ~C] 140 ~ 1.141 ~ 01.1467 ~ C-L.14(r I 00.119 ~ (-0.119 | C-0.119 ~ 00.119 ~ C-119 ~ C-0.1 19 | 00.092 | C-0.092 ~ CO.092 | C-0 092 med and uo.064 U-0.064 ~ U-0 064 U.0.064 0-0 064 U.0.0 ~ U 0.064 13-0.064 ~ 6-0.064 U-0.064 0 .031 U-0 051 U-0 051 U-0.051 U-0.036 U..0.036 Jo tuare aaE,Ins 1O0Lt Jo 104102 bs Jod spon 139 mqi,0 jod spinod o: I .8111 3.10!n 10. I JL[AJ,%1 TBUâ€žBUI atil 0124,# 2 .re OOBj.lns 1001,~ Jo 30,4 wr bs jac! spun COMMERCIAL ENERGY EFFICIENCY Â· Â· 4- C, (402 2 Specific building thermal envelope insulation C402.2.4 Floors. The thermal properties (component R- 2- 1-7 ~reqiuren,Ent, (Prescriptive). Insulation in b.ilding thermal values or assembly U-, C-or F-factors) of floor assemblies F- i /0-4,0 opaque assemblies shall comply with Sections over outdoor air or unconditioned space shall be as speci ~hÂ· > -Â£.4â€ž2 2.1 through C402.2.6 and Table (402.1.3. fied in Table 0102.1.3 01Â· C402.1.4 based on the construe- i,~ ,- Â£402.2.1 Multiple layers of continuous insulation tion materials used in the floor assembly. Floor framing A~ '~r hoa"L Where two or more layers of continuous insulation cavity insulation or structural slab insulation shall be 141' 1 J.-3 board are used in a construction assembly, the continuous installed to maintain permanent contact with.the underside boards shall be installed in accordance with of the subiloor decking or structural slabs. -; . (130;tion C303.2. Where the continuous insulation hoard Exceptions: rr 1 -1 frit_i,- IÂ·'s instructions do not address installation of I. The floor framing cavity insulation or structural p two or more layers, the edge joints between each layer of slab insulation sha[I be permitted to be in contact f . - continuous insulation bourds shall be staggered. with the top side of sheathing or continuous insu- C402.2.2 Roof assembly. 'rhe minimum thermal resis- lation installed on the bottom side of floor assem- tance (R-value) of the insulating material installed either blies where combined with insulation that meets G between tile roof framing or continuously on the roof or exceeds the minimum R-value in Table assembly shall be as specified in Table C402.1.3, based on 2402.1.4 for "Metal framed" or "Wood framed . construction materials used in the roof assembly. Skylight and other" values for "Walls, Above Grade" and curbs shall be insulated to the level of roofs with insula- extends from the bottom to the top of all pei'ime- 24 Lion entirely above deck or R-5, whichever is less. ter floor fraining or floor assembly members. I Exceptions: 2. Insulation applied to the underside of concrete 1. Continuously insulated roof assemblies where the floor slabs shall be permitted an airspace of not more than 1 inch (25 mm) where it turns up and is t .- thickness of insulation varies 1 inch (25 min) or in contact with the underside of the floor under [ess and where the area-weighted U- factor is i equivalent to the same assembly with the R-value walls associated with the building thermal enve- 4 lope. specified in Table C402.1.3. 2. Where tapered insulation is 11.sed with insulation C402.2.5 Slabs-on-gracie perimeter insulation. Where entirely above deck, the R-value where the insu the slab on grade is in contact with the ground, the mini- P latin thickness varies 1 inch (25 man) or less mum thermal remstance (R-value) of the insulation around from the niinimum thickness of tapered insula the perimeter of unheated or heated slab-on-grade floors tion shall comply with the R-value specified in designed in accordance with the R- value method of Sec- Table Â£402.1.3. tion C402.1.3 shall be as specified in Table C402.1.3. The insulation shall be placed on the outside of the foundation 3. Unit skylight curbs included as a component of a or on the inside of the foundation wall. 01'he insulation skylight listed and labeled in accordance with shall extend downward from the top of the slab for a mini- NFRC 100 shall not be required to be insulated. mum distance as shown in the table or to the top of tile I I insulation insralled on a suspended ceiling with remov- footing, whichever is less, or downward to at least the hot- able ceiling lites shall not be considered part of the mini- tom of the slab and then horizontally to the interior or mum thermal resistance of the roof insulation. exterior for the total distance shown in the table. Insulation extending away from the building Nhal be protected by C402.2.3 Thermal resistance of above-gracie walls. The pavement or by not less than of 10 inches (254 mIn) of minimum thermal resistance (R-value) of materials soil. installed in the wan cavity between framing members and continuously on the walls shall be as specified in Table Exception: Where the slab-on-grade floor is greater ('4()1 3, based on framing type and construction materials than 24 inches (61 min) below the finished extenor used in the wall assembly. The R-value of integral insula- grade, perinieter insulation is not required. tion installed in concrete masonry units shall not be used 4 402.2.6 Insulation of radiant heating systems. Radiant in determining compliance with Table C402.1.3. heating fwtem panels, and their associated components 'Mass walls" shall include walls: that are installed in interior or exterior assemblies shall be insulated with a minimum of R-3.5 (0.62 m'/K Â· W ) on all 1. Weighing not less than 35 psf (170 kg/And) of wall surfaces not facing the space being heated. Radiant heat- surfacearea. ing system panels that are installed in the budding thermal 2. Weighing not less than 25 psf (120 kg/ne) of wall envelope shall be separated froII, the exterior of tile build- surface area where the material weight is not more ing or unconditioned or exempt spaces by not less than the than 120 pef (1900 kg/m'). R-value of insulation installed in the opaque assembly in 3. I [aving a heatcapacity exceeding 7 Btu/ft"F (144 which they are installed or the assembly shall comply with cage/mz . K). Section C4()2.1.4. 4. Having a heat capacity exceeding 5 Btu/ft' Â· Â°F (103 Exception: Heated slabs on grade insulated in accor- dance with Section C402.2.5, kI/m,1 Â· K), where the material weight is not more than 120 pef (1900 kg/m'). 2015 INTERNAT]ONAL ENERGY CONSERVATION CODEÂ® C-35 -0. 1. 7:,9,4....0-5..:7,41%&~*AN C .3.~ %~MN#/NVM Exhi\04 b r--- 41 C 40 -tr I L 2 6 }1 3 3. 2 4,3 :4 r - ' .1 i 926.-1 ... 2 THE SKY HOTEL PLANNED DEVELOPMENT DETAILED REVIEW APPLICATION A PLANNED DEVELOPMENT DETAILED REVIEW APPLICATION FOR THE SKY HOTEL PROPERTY Submitted by: Aspen Club Lodge Properties, LLC c/o Northridge Capital, LLC 1101 30th. Street, NW, Suite 150 Washington, DC 20007 (202) 625-7890 JULY 1 5, 2015 Prepared by: VANN ASSOCIATES, LLC Planning Consultants P.O. Box 4827 Basalt, CO 81621 (970 925-6958 PROJECT CONSULTANTS OWNERS REPRESENTATIVE PLANNER John Sarpa Sunny Vann Sarpa Development Vann Associates, LLC 300 South Spring Street P.O. Box 4827 Aspen, CO 81611 Basalt, CO 81621 (970) 379-2595 (970) 925-6958 ARCHITECT ATTORNEY Scott McHale, Leed AP Gideon Kaufman, Esq. Rowland + Broughton Kaufman, Dishler & McAllister, P.C. 234 East Hopkins Avenue 315 East Hyman Avenue, Suite 305 Aspen, Co 81611 Aspen, CO 81611 (970) 544-9006 (970) 925-8166 f LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT SURVEYOR Valerie Yaw, ASLA Mark Beckler, L.S. BlueGreen Sopris Engineering, LLC 300 South Spring Street, Suite 202 502 Main Street, Suite A3 Aspen, CO 81611 Carbondale, CO 81623 (970) 429-7499 (970) 704-0311 CIVIL ENGINEER COMMUNICATIONS Jesse Swann, P.E. RJ Gallagher Sopris Engineering, LLC Forte International 502 Main Street, Suite A3 P.O. Box 8610 Carbondale, CO 81623 Aspen, CO 81612 (970) 704-0311 (970) 925-6958 ENVIRONMENTAL HAZARDS Peggy Bailey Tetra Tech 130 Ski Hill Road, Suite 140 Breckenridge, CO 80424 (720) 864-4589 1 TABLE OF CONTENTS Section Page I. INTRODUCTION 1 - 11. PROJECT REVISIONS 2 111. PROJECT REVIEW APPROVAL CONDITIONS 6 IV. REVIEW REQUIREMENTS 12 A. Planned Development 12 B. Commercial Design Review 18 APPENDIX A. Exhibit 1, Pre-Application Conference Summary Exhibit 2, Title Insurance Commitment Exhibit 3, Permission to Represent Exhibit 4, Land Use Application Form Exhibit 5, Dimensional Requirements Form Exhibit 6, Application Fee Agreement Exhibit 7, Homeowner Association Compliance Form Exhibit 8, List of Adjacent Property Owners B. Exhibit 1, Rowland + Broughton Memorandum Re: Architectural Revisions ii TABLE OF CONTENTS Section Page APPENDIX B. Exhibit 2, Draft Sky Hotel Subdivision/PD Plan Set Exhibit 3, City Council Ordinance No. 39, Series of 2014 Exhibit 4, COMDEV Notice of Approval Exhibit 5, Engineering Report C. Exhibit 1, Draft Sky Hotel Subdivision/PD Development Agreement Exhibit 2, Construction Management Plan Exhibit 3, Transportation Impact Analysis Exhibit 4, Fire Marshall E-Mail Exhibit 5, Trash/Delivery Areas Door Details iii 1. INTRODUCTION The following application requests Planned Development - Detailed Review approval for the demolition and replacement of the Sky Hotel, which is located at 709 East Durant Avenue in the City of Aspen (see Pre-Application Conference Summary, Exhibit 1, Appendix A, attached hereto). Final Commercial Design Review approval, and vested rights status for all approvals granted pursuant to this application and the prior Planned Development - Project Review application, are also requested. The application is submitted pursuant to Sections 26.412 and 26.445 of the Aspen Land Use Regulations (the "Regulations") by the owner of the property, Aspen Club Lodge Properties, LLC (hereinafter "Applicant"), a Delaware limited liability company (see Title Insurance Commitment, Exhibit 2, Appendix A). Permission for Vann - Associates, LLC, Planning Consultants, to represent the Applicant is attached as Exhibit 3, Appendix A. A land use application form, dimensional requirements form, application fee agreement, homeowner association compliance form, and a list of property owners located within three hundred feet of the project site are attached as Exhibits 4,5,6,7 and 8, respectively. The application is divided into four sections. Section I provides a brief introduction to the application while Section II discusses various revisions to the project that have occurred since the receipt of Planned Development - Project Review approval. Sections III and IV of the application address the proposed development's compliance with the conditions of Project Review approval and the Regulations' Detailed Review criteria. For the reviewer's convenience, all pertinent documents relating to the project (e.g., improvement survey, development agreement, engineering reports, etc.) are provided in the appendices to the application. 1 While the application is intended to address all relevant provisions of the Regula- tions, and to provide sufficient information to enable a thorough evaluation of the proposed development, questions may arise which require further information and/or clarification. The Applicant will provide such additional information as may be required in the course of the application's review. 11. PROJECT REVISIONS Various minor changes to the proposed hotel's architecture, dimensional requirements, site plan and landscaping, and civil engineering requirements have occurred since the receipt of Planned Development - Project Review approval. In general, these changes can be attributed to the development of more detailed floor plans and elevations, the requirements of various building codes, site plan and landscaping refinements, and further engineering analysis. The proposed development, however, is essentially the same as that which received Project Review approval. No changes to the project's basic development program (i.e., the number of lodge units, keys and bedrooms; commercial components; and affordable housing units) are proposed. The specific changes to the hotel' s floor plans and elevations are outlined in the attached Rowland + Broughton memorandum (see Exhibit 1, Appendix B). The revised plans and elevations referenced therein are contained in the Draft Sky Hotel Subdivi- sion/PD Plan Set (the "Draft Plan Set") attached hereto as Exhibit 2, Appendix B. Changes to the project's dimensional requirements are limited to minor revisions to the hotel' s various floor areas and proposed public amenity space. No changes to the hotel's lodge net livable area, its commercial net leasable area, or its affordable housing net livable area are proposed. Detailed floor area calculations for both the existing hotel and 4 ---~ 1 its proposed replacement are provided on Sheets PDO.5 and PDO.5e of the Draft Plan Set. The hotel's revised floor areas are summarized in Table 1 on the following page. 2 Table 1 REVISED FLOOR AREAS Sky Hotel Project Review Detailed Reviewl Floor Area Ratioz Lodge 72,781 72,360 1.95:1 Commercial 3,460 3,459 0.09:1 Affordable Housing 1,876 1,876 0.05:1 Non-Unit Space 13,435 13,632 0.37:1 Cumulative 91,552 91,327 2.46:1 1 The area of the hotel' s subgrade basement otherwise attributable to floor area is exempt from floor area calculations pursuant to Section 26.575.020.D.7. of the Regulations. 2 Based on a Net Lot Area of 37,113 square feet which includes the property's vacated right-of ways and excludes both the existing Aspen Alps access easement and the proposed Chateau Dumont/Chaumont access easement. As Sheets PD1.3b, PD1.3c and PD1.3d in the Draft Plan Set indicates, the hotel's proposed public amenity space totals 11,367 square feet, a decrease in the previously approved public amenity space of 431 square feet, or approximately 3.7 percent. The reduction can be attributed to the refinement of the hotel's site plan and rooftop amenity space, and to revisions to its second floor patio to reflect a required building setback that was overlooked at Project Review. The percentage of public amenity space, however, has increased from 27.6 percent to 47.4 percent. The approved percentage was erroneously calculated based on the property's Gross Lot Area. As Section 26.575.030 of the Regulations requires the exclusion of vacated right-of-ways from Gross Lot Area, the property's lot area for public amenity purposes is 24,001 square feet (i.e., 42,645 Sq. Ft. Gross Lot Area - 18,644 Sq. Ft. Vacated ROWs). The resulting percentage substantially exceeds the Lodge zone district' s minimum 25 percent requirement. 3 It should be noted that several of the hotel's setbacks were misstated in the Project Review application's approved dimensional requirements. While the floor plans that were reviewed by the Community Development Department ("COMDEV") and approved by the City Council depict the correct building setbacks, Exhibit A: Approved Dimensional Requirements to Ordinance No. 39, Series of 2014, apparently was not updated to reflect the approved plans (see Exhibit 3, Appendix B). As both Exhibit A and Section 1 of the Ordinance permit COMDEV to approve minor revisions to the approved dimensional requirements, an Administrative Planned Development - Project Review Amendment was approved to correct the errors. The corrected setbacks are contained in the Notice of Approval attached hereto as Exhibit 4, Appendix B. Changes to the hotel' s site plan and street level landscaping are limited to refinements to curbs, ramps, the vehicular pullout/valet area, the Aspen Alps 100 Building's parking area, the planter boxes, and plant layouts. In addition, the previously - proposed on-site north/south path between the hotel and the Glory Hole condominiums has been eliminated. Changes to the rooftop amenity areas include a minor enlargement of the swimming pool, and various refinements to the bar trellis, spas, ramps, planter boxes, and plant layouts. The various site plan and landscape revisions are provided on Sheets PD1.1, L200, L300, L400 and L.401 in the Draft Plan Set. Engineering Department comments and the changes to the hotel' s site plan and architecture have resulted in various revisions to Sopris Engineering's previously submitted Engineering Report and associated civil drawings. The revisions pertain primarily to the project's drainage and utility plans which have been updated to reflect current project conditions. The revision are discussed in detail in the attached Engineering Report (see Exhibit 5, Appendix C) and provided on Sheets C 1 through C5 of the Draft Plan Set. 4 As a result of ongoing discussions between the Applicant and the owners of the condominium units in the Aspen Alps 100 Building, several additional changes to the hotel's site plan, subgrade parking garage, and Level 1 Floor Plan may be required. More specifically, the discussions contemplate a reduction in the 100 Building's existing surface parking spaces located on the Sky property from 12.5 spaces to eleven spaces. The existing parking layout would also be reconfigured to include six angle spaces and five parallel spaces. In addition, the proposed subgrade garage would be expanded to include sixteen additional spaces for the use and benefit of the 100 Building's owners. The expansion of the garage would increase its parking from fifty-four spaces to seventy spaces. To facilitate pedestrian access to the new spaces, a linen area on the hotel' s ground floor would be reconfigured to include an exterior entry from the alley. The proposed revisions, which are referred to as "Option B", are provided on Sheets PD1.lb, L200b, L300b and L40lb in the Draft Plan Set. As Sheet PD2.Ob illustrates, twenty-two of the expanded garage's seventy spaces will be stacked. As the hotel's parking requirement is forty-one spaces (i.e., 32 replacement spaces + 7 new lodge spaces + 2 new affordable housing spaces), sufficient parking will be available in the expanded garage to meet applicable regulatory requirements. As Sheet PDO. 5b illustrates, the garage's parking non-unit space will increase from approximately 19,260 square feet to approximately 21,511 square feet. No increase in the hotel's floor area, however, will occur as the expanded parking area is located 100 percent below grade. Given the ongoing nature of the discussions the Applicant requests that Option B also be approved by the Planning and Zoning Commission so as to avoid the necessity of a Planned Development amendment in the event the discussions are successfully concluded. Only one parking scenario, however, will be provided on the plans to be recorded following the receipt of Planned Development - Detailed Review approval. 5 111. PROJECT REVIEW APPROVAL CONDITIONS Planned Development - Project Review approval for the redevelopment of the Sky Hotel was granted subject to conditions by the City Council on February 9, 2015 pursuant to Ordinance No. 39, Series of 2014. The Ordinance's specific approval conditions, and the Detailed Review application's compliance therewith, are summarized as follows. 1. Section 1: Approvals In addition to Planned Development - Project Review approval, Ordinance No. 39 granted Subdivision, Timeshare, Growth Management, Special Review, Conditional Use, and Conceptual Commercial Design Review approvals to the proposed development. This section of the Ordinance also specifically permits minor variations in the approved Project Review application' s dimensional requirements. 2. Section 2: Effectiveness of Ordinance 4, Series 2015 Ordinance No. 4 permits the inclusion of right-of-ways located within the Lodge zone district that were vacated prior to the adoption of Ordinance No. 11, Series of 1975, in the project site' s Net Lot Area. As a result, the vacated right-of-ways located within the project site have been included in its Net Lot Area for purposes of calculating the project's allowable floor areas. The property's resulting Net Lot Area is 37,113 square feet. 3. Section 3: Subsequent Reviews This condition requires the submission of a Planned Development - Detailed Review and Final Commercial Design Review application within one year of the receipt of Project Review approval. This application complies with this requirement. 6 4. Section 4: Timeshare Lodge Requirements This condition is addressed in Section 3.4(b) of the proposed Development Agreement (the "Agreement") which is attached as Exhibit 1, Appendix C. 5. Section 5: Growth Management Allotments The reconstruction credits and growth management allotments referenced in Sections 5.1 and 5.2 are addressed in Sections 3.2(a) and 3.2(b) of the Agreement. 6. Section 6: Affordable Housing The mitigation requirements, special review approval, and affordable housing conditions referenced in Sections 6.1, 6.2 and 6.3 are addressed in Sections 3.3(a), 3.3(b) and 3.3(c) of the Agreement. 7. Section 7: Planned Development - Detailed Review Outdoor lighting plans, Existing and Proposed Landscaping Plans, and Snow Storage and Shedding Plans, are contained in the Draft Plan Set and are provided as Sheets PD3.2, PD3.4c, PD3.5a and PD3.5b, respectively. A draft Construction Management Plan is attached hereto as Exhibit 2, Appendix C. An updated Transporta- tion Impact Analysis is attached as Exhibit 3, Appendix C. As Sheet PD1.1, Proposed Site Plan, in the Draft Plan Set illustrates, the Spring Street "bump out" has been removed. As discussed in Section 9.5, below, the Fire Marshall has reviewed the proposed Spring Street improvements and approved its existing cul-de-sac configuration. 8. Section 8: Subdivision/PD Plat and Agreement An Approved Plan Set will be submitted for recordation upon receipt of Planned Development - Detailed Review and Final Commercial Design Review approval. 7 The various required plans and a subdivision plat are included in the Draft Plan Set. Please note that the plat depicts a Chateau Dumont and Chateau Chaumont access easement. The effective date for this easement will be the date that the Sky Hotel receives a Certificate of Occupancy from the City of Aspen. A public access easement for the hotel' s second floor and rooftop public amenity space is also referenced on the plat, the specifics of which will be addressed in detail on the hotel's condominium map and in the associated condominium declaration. As noted previously, a draft Development Agreement is attached as Exhibit 1, Appendix C. The required Site Protection and Site Enhancement Guarantees referenced in Section 8.c. of the Ordinance are addressed in Sections 5.1(a) and 5.1(b) of the Agreement. The Performance guarantees required pursuant to Section 8.d. are addressed in Section 5.2 of the Agreement. The various requirements pertaining to the proposed development's timeshare documents contained in Sections 8.e. and 8.f. are addressed in Sections 3.4,3.4(a) and 3.4(c) of the Agreement. 9. Section 9: Engineering Department The requirement that the project comply with Title 21 of the Municipal Code is addressed in Section 3.6 of the Agreement. a) Section 9.1: Drainage. This condition is addressed in Section 3.6(a) of the Agreement. A Conceptual Grading and Drainage Plan is provided as Sheet C2 in the Draft Plan Set. b) Section 9.3: Excavation Stabilization. This condition is addressed in Section 3.6(b) of the Agreement. c) Section 9.4: Construction Management Plan. This condition is addressed in Section 3.6(d)(i) of the Agreement. A draft Construction Management 8 plan is attached hereto as Exhibit 2, Appendix C. A final Construction Management Plan meeting applicable Engineering Department requirements will be submitted with the Applicant's building permit submission. d) Section 9.5: Traffic Flow. The requirement that traffic flow within the alley remain as currently configured is addressed in Section 3.6(c) of the Agreement. As the Proposed Site Plan illustrates, the Spring Street bump out has been removed. The Fire Marshall has reviewed the Proposed Site Plan and has determined that no improvements in the Spring Street cud-de-sac area are required (see Exhibit 4, Appendix C). 10. Section 10: Fire Mitigation This condition is addressed in Section 3.13 of the Agreement. 11. Section 11: Parks Department The requirement that tree removal permits be obtained prior issuance of a building permit is addressed in Section 3.11(a) of the Agreement. The required tree protection plan is addressed in Section 3.11(b) of the Agreement. 12. Section 12: Aspen Consolidated Sanitation District Requirements The ACSD's requirements are addressed in Section 3.8of the Agreement. 13. Section 13: Environmental Health Department a) Section 13.1: Environmental Health Codes. This condition is addressed in Section 3.9(a) of the Agreement. b) Section 13.2: Trash Requirements. This condition is addressed in Section 3.9(b) of the Agreement. The location and size of the hotel's trash and 9 delivery areas remain unchanged from that which was approved at Project Review. Cut sheets depicting the type of doors to be installed at the hotel's trash and delivery areas are attached as Exhibit 5, Appendix C. c) Section 13.3: Deliveries and Trash Removal. The various requirements of this condition are addressed in Section 3.9(c) of the Agreement. As Sheet PD2.1 in the Draft Plan Set illustrates, the hotel's delivery and trash areas each contain only one overhead door. d) Section 13.4: Noise Requirements. The requirements of this condition are addressed in Section 3.12 of the Agreement. 14. Section 14: Transportation Department This condition is addressed in Section 3.10 of the Agreement. An updated Transportation Impact Analysis is attached as Exhibit 3, Appendix C. The TDM and MMLOS measures contained therein will be attached to the Agreement as Exhibit B prior to recordation. 15. Section 15: Parking a) Section 15.1: Fire Lane. Thehotel's required vehicular loading zone is depicted on the Proposed Site Plan. b) Section 15.2: Required Parking. This condition is addressed in Section 3.1(d) of the Agreement. As Sheet PD2.0, Basement Ll Floor Plan, of the Draft Plan Set illustrates, a total of 54 spaces are provided in the project's subgrade garage, seven o f which are stacked. c) Section 15.3: Parking Garage Use. This condition is addressed in Section 3.1(d) of the Agreement. 10 d) Section 15.4: Affordable Housing Parking. This condition is addressed in Section 3.1(d) of the Agreement. 16. Section 16: Water/Utilities Department This condition is addressed in Section 3.7 of the Agreement. A Conceptual Utility Plan is provided in the Draft Plan Set as Sheet C5. 17. Section 17: Outdoor Lighting and Signage This condition is addressed in Section 3.14 of the Agreement. Outdoor lighting plans are provided as Sheets PD3.2, PD3.4c, PD3.5a and PD3.5b in the Draft Plan Set. 18. Section 18: Public Amenity Spaces The requirements of this condition are addressed in Section 3.1(e) of the Agreement. The hotel's public amenity space calculations have been revised in connection with the further development and refinement of its site plan, floor plans and roof plan. As depicted on Sheets PD3. lb, PD3. le and PD3. ld of the Draft Plan Set, the hotel's revised public amenity areas contain a total of 11,367 square feet (i.e., 3,430 Sq. Ft. at grade; 1,362 Sq. Ft. on the second floor patio; and 6,575 Sq. Ft. on the rooftop deck). At approximately 47.4 percent, the Hotel's revised public amenity space substantially exceeds the Lodge zone district's minimum requirement of 25 percent. 19. Section 19: Building Department This condition is addressed in Section 3.5 of the Agreement. 20. Section 20: Material Representations This condition is addressed in Section 3.15 of the Agreement. 11 IV. REVIEW REQUIREMENTS A. Planned Development The Planned Development - Detailed Review standards, which are contained in Section 26.445.070 of the Regulations, and the proposed development's compliance therewith, are summarized below. 1. Compliance with Project Review Approval. The proposed development, including all dimensions and uses, is consistent with the Project Review approval and adequately addresses conditions on the approval and direction received during the Project Review. The proposed development is consistent with that which received Project Review approval. Minor changes to the hotel's architecture, dimensional requirements, site plan, landscaping and civil engineering requirements, however, have occurred as a result of the development of more detailed floor plans and elevations, the requirements of various building codes, site plan and landscaping refinements, and further engineering analysis. Compliance with the conditions of Project Review approval is addressed in Section III of this application. 2. Growth Management. The proposed development has received all required GMQS allotments or is currently seeking allotments. All required growth management allotments were granted in connection with the Project Review approval. 3. Site Planning and Landscape Architecture. The site plan is compatible with the context and visual character of the area. In meeting this standard, the following criteria shall be used: 12 a) The landscape plan exhibits a well-designed treatment of exterior spaces, preserves existing significant vegetation, and provides and ample quantity and variety of ornamental plat species suitable for the Aspen area climate. Vegetation removal, protection, and restoration plan shall be acceptable to the Director of Parks and Open Space. The proposed landscape plans exhibit a well-designed treatment of the hotel' s exterior spaces. The landscape plans also provide generous detail regarding the significant areas of plantings as well a thoughtful diversity of hardy/native plant species suitable for the Aspen area climate. It is anticipated that the proposed plant list will be refined prior to building permit submission and in coordination with the Parks Depart- ment. Aspen Tree Service has indicated that the majority of the property's existing trees were planted approximately thirty-five years ago and that, due to extensive hardscape conditions, existing plant material has reached its maximum potential. The overall health and condition of the majority of the existing trees is poor, and their replacement with more suitable species is highly recommended. All vegetation removal will be coordinated with the Parks Department and required permits will be obtained prior removal. As presently proposed, the hotel's streetscape will receive fifty-four new trees and approximately 5,000 square feet of perennial/shrub plantings. Forty-one trees and approximately 3,000 square feet of perennial/shrub plantings will be installed on the second floor patio and rooftop. b) Buildings and site grading provide simple, at-grade entrances and minimize extensive grade changes along building exteriors. The project meets or exceeds the requirements of the Americans with Disabilities Act and applicable requirements for emergency, maintenance, and service vehicle access, Adequate snow storage is accommodated. With the exception of the building' s east wing alley door and the affordable housing alley access doors, all entrances to the hotel are located at grade. The east wing's alley doors, however, abut an ADA compliant ramp. As Sheet PD 1.2, Site 13 Accessibility Plan, of the Draft Plan Set illustrates, all of the hotel's entrances and sidewalks are ADA/ANSI compliant. As the Snow Storage and Shedding Plans provided as Sheets PD1.4 and PD1.5 illustrate, adequate on-site snow storage will be provided. c) Energy efficiency or production features are integrated into the landscape in a manner than enhances the site. Energy efficient features within the hotel's landscaped areas are limited to outdoor lighting fixtures. d) All site lighting is proposed so as to prevent direct glare or hazardous interference of any kind to adjoining streets or lands. All exterior lighting shall comply with the City's outdoor lighting standards. All site lighting is proposed in a fashion to prevent glare or hazardous interference of any kind to adjoining streets or properties. Exterior lighting is strategically designed to integrate cohesively with site and architectural features such as benches, handrails, planters and walls. The approach supports the long-term integrity of the fixtures, keeping them clear of snow removal zones or other areas that may threaten their function. Exterior lighting is limited to key areas of pedestrian circulation and use. All exterior lighting will comply with the City's outdoor lighting standards. e) Site drainage is accommodated for the proposed development in compliance with Title 29 - Engineering Design Standards and shall not negatively impact surrounding properties. As discussed in the Engineering Report, the hotel's drainage plan has been designed to comply with applicable City requirements and to avoid adverse impacts to neighboring properties. As the report indicates, a small area located in the southeast corner of the property is located within a mapped "Blue" mudflow zone, and the eastern portion of the property lies with the "Yellow" zone. Pursuant to Chapter 7 of the City's Urban Runoff Management Plan CURMP"), projects that modify existing grades or 14 create additional obstructions in a Blue mudflow zone are required to conduct an analysis of the 100-year mudflow event to demonstrate that mudflow impacts to the project site and neighboring properties will be managed to the maximum extent feasible. As required by the URMP, a mudflow analysis was performed by Tetra tech to determine any design constraints for the proposed development. The analysis, which is attached as Exhibit E to the Engineering Report, concludes that the proposed development "will not cause increases in mud depths at offsite properties" and that the hotel can be "constructed in compliance with the City's mudflow regulations". Where required, the hotel's exterior walls will be reinforced and windows will contain impact resistant glass to withstand the dynamic and static mudflow pressures. 4. Design Standards and Architecture. The proposed architectural details emphasize quality construction and design characteristics. In meeting this standard, the following criteria shall be used: a) The project architecture provides for visual interest and incorporates present-day details and use of materials respectful of the community's past without attempting to mimic history. The proposed development is respectful of the community' s past without attempting to mimic history. The hotel' s architecture is a modern day translation and renaissance of the Mountain Chalet style that blends recognizable mountain vernacular with contemporary details. The Mountain Chalet style originated in the European Alps and various design iterations can be seen around the world as well as in many US ski resorts including Aspen. The design and articulation of the building incorporates one, two, three and four story forms; varied balconies; various roof forms; multiple facade shifts; and appropriate contextual materials and textures, all which help to create visual interest and blend the hotel into its surroundings. 15 Exterior materials are of a high quality, durability, and comply b) wit applicable design standards, including those outlined in Chapter 26.410, Residential Design Standards, Chapter 26.412, Commercial Design Standards, and Chapter 26.415, Historic Preservation. All building material are high quality, durable and appropriate for the budget and scale of the project. The hotel's siding will consist of stone veneer cladding; three types of wood siding (i.e., lx4 vertical wood siding, lx8 horizontal wood siding and 2x12 plank wood siding); natural patina metal panels; and stucco finishes. Roofing materials will consist of standing seam and corrugated metal with a durable gray finish. All building materials are consistent with the requirements of the City' s Commercial Design Standards. c) Building Entrances are sited or designed to minimize icing and snow shedding effects. All building entrances have been sited and designed to minimize icing and snow shedding. d) Energy efficiency or production features are integrated into structures in a manner that enhances the architecture. The hotel has been designed and will be constructed with environmentally sustainable materials. The building's support systems (i.e., mechanical, HVAC, plumbing, electrical, lighting and technology) will meet or exceed local and national energy efficiency codes and standards. e) All structure lighting is proposed so as to prevent direct glare or hazardous interference of any kind to adjoining streets or lands. All exterior lighting shall comply with the City's outdoor lighting standards. All exterior lighting has been designed to prevent direct glare and avoid adverse impacts to adjoining streets and neighboring properties. 16 - 5. Common Parks, Open Space, Recreation Areas or Facilities. This review standard does not apply as the proposed development does not contain common parks, open space, recreation areas or facilities for which an undivided interest will be deeded to owners of fractional ownership units. 6. Pedestrian, Bicycle and Transit Facilities. The development improves pedestrian, bicycle and transit facilities. These facilities and improvements shall be prioritized over vehicular facilities and improvements. Any new vehicular access points minimize impacts on existing pedestrian, bicycle and transit facilities. Pedestrian and bicycle improvements have been prioritized over vehicular facilities. Generous and continuous sidewalks with bike parking nooks are located throughout the streetscape and at convenient, user-friendly nodes. The parking garage entry is thoughtfully situated in complement with adjacent utility/loading docks so as to minimize vehicular/pedestrian conflicts. Valet parking will further reduce the potential for such conflicts. Crosswalks are clearly defined and encourage safe connections to adjacent sidewalks and trails. No transit facilities are proposed due to the hotel's close proximity to the City' s Rubey Park transit center. 7. Engineering Design Standards. There has been accurate identification of engineering design and mitigation techniques necessary for development of the proposed subdivision to comply with the applicable requirements of Municipal Code Title 29 - Engineering Design Standards and the City of Aspen Urban Runoff Managernent plan (URMP). As discussed in the attached Engineering Report, the proposed hotel has been designed in compliance with the applicable requirements of the City's engineering standards and its Urban Runoff Management Plan. 17 8. Public Infrastructure and Facilities. The proposed Planned Development shall upgrade public infrastructure and facilities necessary to serve the project. Improvements shall be at the sole cost of the developer. Ij All costs associated with the installation of the hotel's public infrastructure requirements will be borne by the Applicant. 9. Phasing of Development Plan. This review standard does not apply as phasing of the project is not proposed. \1 B. Commercial Design Review Conceptual Commercial design review approval was granted to the project in connection with the approval of the Applicant's Planned Development - Project Review application. The receipt of Final Commercial Design Review approval is subject to compliance with the applicable guidelines contained in the City's Commercial, Lodging and Historic District Objectives and Guidelines (the "Guidelines"). It should be noted, however, that the Guidelines apply primarily to commercial structures and not to lodge projects with limited or no streetfront commercial space. The applicable Final Commercial Design Review guidelines, and the proposed development's compliance therewith, are summarized below. 1. Building Design and Articulation a) Expression of Lot Widths 1.29 A new building shall reflect the traditional lot width (30 feet) as expressed by two or more of the following: â€¢ Variation in height at internal lot lines. â€¢ Variation in the plane of the front facade. - â€¢ Street facade composition. 18 â€¢ Variation in architectural detailing and materials to emphasize the building module. The proposed hotel's height varies at internal lot lines, and its facades contain numerous areas where there is a variation in plane (e.g., balconies, decks and steps in building facades). The hotel' s Durant and Spring Street facades have variations reflecting traditional lot widths, and its proposed building materials (i.e., stone veneer, three types of wood siding and stucco finishes) help to emphasize the building module. 1.30 The detailed design of the building facade should reflect the traditional scale and rhythm of the block. This should be achieved using all of the following: â€¢ The fenestration grouping. â€¢ The modeling of the facade. â€¢ The design framework for the first floor storefront. â€¢ Variation in architectural detail and/or the palette of facade materials. The project site is located in a unique area of the City that contains lodging structures that are atypical of structures in the downtown core. The hotel occupies the entire western portion of Block 107. The hotel's facades reflect similar scale and rhythm as the neighboring Little Nell Hotel, Chateau Dumont and Chateau Chaumont, Mountain Chalet Lodge and St Regis Hotel. The facades incorporate various fenestration groupings and modelings. The hotel's first floor storefront consist primarily of the hotel entrance which is located adjacent to Spring Street. The remaining ground floor facades contain smaller lodge room windows for privacy and energy efficiency, As discussed above, variations in architectural design and building materials have been incorporated in the hotel' s facades. 19 b) Facade Articulation 1.31 A building should reflectthe architectural hierarchy and articulation inherent in the composition of the street facade. The following should be addressed: â€¢ The design and definition of the traditionally tall first floor. â€¢ The vertical proportions of the upper level fenestration pattern and ratio of solid wall to window area. The hotel's first floor has a taller floor to floor height than its upper floors and window head heights of eight feet. The head height of its upper windows is seven feet. The Spring Street public entrance is glass storefront. The hotel's upper level fenestration has appropriate proportions of solid wall to windows that supports the traditional architectural hierarchy and articulation evident throughout the C ity ' s core. 1.32 A building should reflect the three-dimensional characteristics of the street facade in the strength and depth of modeling, fenestration and architectural detail. The proposed hotel's design reflect's the characteristics of its street facades in the strength and depth o f its modeling, fenestration and architectural detail. c) Floor Stature 1.33 Any new building shall be designed to maintain a minimum of 9 feet from floor to ceiling on all floors. 1 4 The hotel' s floor to floor heights were reduced in connection with its Planned Development - Project Review approval so as to comply with the Lodge zone district forty foot height limitation. The floor to floor height of the hotel's first ftoor is 11 feet 6 inches. The floor to floor height of its upper floors is 9 feet 9 inches. The 20 , building's structure consists of a post-tensioned concrete plate slab with concrete columns that minimizes structural depths. The hotel's main level floor to ceiling height varies from 10 feet 6 inches in taller areas to 9 feet in areas with dropped ceilings. Floor to ceiling heights on the hotel's upper floors vary from 8 to 9 feet. 1.34 Maintain the distinction between the street level and upper floors. â€¢ The first floor should be the tallest floor to floor height in the building. â€¢ The first floor of the primary facade should be predominantly transparent glass. â€¢ Upper floors should be perceived as being more opaque that the street level. Upper story windows should have a vertical emphasis. â€¢ Highly reflective or darkly tinted glass is inappropriate. â€¢ Express the traditional distinction in floor heights between street levels and upper levels through detailing. materials and fenestra- tion. The presence of a belt course is an important feature in this relationship. The hotel's first floor contains the building's highest floor to floor , height. The hotel's Spring Street entrance area is predominantly glass. The remainder of the primary facade contains smaller windows for guest privacy and energy efficiency. The hotel's upper floors have a traditional higher ratio of solid wall to glass and a vertical emphasis. No highly reflective or darkly tinted glass is proposed. The detailing, materials and fenestration of the hotel's facades help to express the traditional distinction in floor heights, and a belt course separates the first and second floors. 1.35 A new building should be designed to maintain the stature of traditional street level retail frontage. â€¢ This should be 13-15 feet in floor to floor height on the first floor. 1 â€¢ The minimum required first floor height must be maintained for at least the first 50 foot depth of the lot, and may only be dropped 21 to a lower height beyond that point for areas that are devoted to storage, circula- tion,offices, restaurant kitchens, or similar secondary uses. As discussed previously, a reduced first floor to floor height was approved at Project Review so as to maintain a maximum building height of forty feet. First floor ceilings heights are generally consistent with dropped ceiling heights in the hotel' s trash and delivery areas. 1.36 Minimize the appearance of a tall third floor. â€¢ Where a third floor's ceiling height is in excess of 12 feet, it should be set back a minimum of 15 feet from the street facade to reduce the apparent height. â€¢ Increase the parapet height to screen the visual impact of a tall top floor. â€¢ The design of a set back third floor shall be simpler in form, more subdued in modeling. detail and color than the primary facade. The hotel's third floor ceiling height is consistent on all street facades and measures less than twelve feet. The east wing's alley facade, however, has some third floor vaulted ceilings that reflect its articulated roofs. Sloped roof forms on the hotel' s upper level function as parapets and guardrails, and will help to screen rooftop activities. d) First Floor Character 1.37 The first floor facade should be designed to concentrate interest at the street level using the highest quality of design, detailing and materials. â€¢ A strong and distinctively designed retail framework for the first floor of the building. â€¢ An entryway designed to use the full height of the storefront. â€¢ A distinct change in the palette of materials used for the first floor design framework. 22 â€¢ The depth and strength of the modeling of elements and details. The hotel' s entry storefront incorporates full height floor to ceiling glass and is designed to embrace the traditional retail framework. The hotel's stone veneer base is intended to emphasize a distinctive first floor and to architecturally ground the building. Large format textured wood plank siding is also used on the ground floor to provide a distinctive change in the palette of building materials. 1.38 The retail entrance should be at the sidewalk level. â€¢ All entrances shall be ADA compliant. â€¢ On sloping sites the retail frontage should be as close to a level entrance as possible. All building entrances are located at grade at sidewalk level and are ADA compliant. The hotel's entry storefront is essentially level. 1.39 Incorporate an airlock entry into the plan for all new structures. â€¢ An airlock entry that projects forward of the primary facade at the sidewalk is inappropriate. â€¢ Adding temporary entries during winter season detracts from the character of the historic district. â€¢ Using a temporary vinyl or fabric airlock to provided protection from winter weather is not permitted. The hotel entrance contains an entry airlock. 1.40 Window area along the first floor shall be a minimum of 60 percent of exterior street facade area when facing principal streets. The hotel's ground floor window area is less than 60 percent due to the streetfront lodge rooms' smaller windows. Window area, however, is maximized at the Spring Street hotel entrance. 23 1.41 Where appropriate a building shall be designed to maintain the character/transparency of the traditional street level retail frontage. The hotel does not contain traditional street level retail frontage. The hotel's entrance, however, incorporates the character and transparency of such spaces. 1.42 Design of the first floor storefront should include particular attention to the following: â€¢ The basic elements and proportions of storefront design. â€¢ Depth and strength of modeling. â€¢ The palette of materials and finishes used in both the structural framework and the storefront window. â€¢ The concentration of architectural detail to ensure a rich visual experience. â€¢ The complementary use of signage and lettering to enhance the retail and downtown character. â€¢ The use of lighting to accentuate visual presence. The Hotel's Spring Street facade contains the basic elements, proportions and details found throughout the immediate neighborhood and downtown that enhance the visual experience. Appropriate signage will be installed that complies with applicable regulations and is complementary with the neighborhoods character. The - effective use of lighting will enhance the hotel' s visual presence and comply with the City's outdoor lighting regulations. e) Side and Rear Facades 1.43 Retail frontage facing onto side courts or rear alleys should follow similar design principles to the street frontage, adjusted for the scale of the space. 24 â€¢ It should be designed with a similar attention to architectural articulation, detail and materials. â€¢ These should have a richness of detail that is inviting to users. The hotel's second floor outdoor patio is similar in design to its Spring Street entrance with large storefront glazing with operable doors that open to the adjacent indoor lounge. f) Roofscape 1.44 A larger building should reflect the traditional lot width in the form and variation of its roof. This should be achieved through the following: â€¢ A set back of the top floor from the front facade. â€¢ Reflect the traditional lot width in the roof plane. The hotel' s roof consists of a mixture of sloping roof forms with dormers that enhances the architectural character of the building. These forms also lend themselves to the City's traditional lot widths and help break down the mass and scale o f the building. Some o f the roof forms are setback with variations that create visual interest and blend in with neighboring buildings. 1.45 The roofscape should be designed with the same design attention as the secondary elevations of the building. â€¢ Group and screen mechanical units from view. â€¢ Locate mechanical equipment to the rear of the roof area. â€¢ Position, articulate and design rooftop enclosures or structures to reflect the modulation and character of the building. â€¢ Use materials which complement the design of the building facades. â€¢ Design roof garden areas to be unobtrusive from the street. 25 â€¢ Use green roof design best practices where feasible. The hotel's mechanical equipment is grouped and screened to the extent feasible. Main mechanical vents and flues have been located primarily in the alley and at the rear portion of the building. The hotel' s rooftop structures have been designed to reflect there use and contribute to the building's modulation and character. The building' s grey metal roofing materials compliment the exterior facade materials. The rooftop planter/garden areas are designed to enhance the hotel's visual presence from the street and the rooftop public amenity experience. The rooftop incorporate green roof areas that are incorporated in the hotel' s drainage design. 2. Architectural Materials 1.46 High quality, durable materials should be employed. â€¢ The palette of materials should be specified, including samples of materials as required. All building materials are high quality, durable and appropriate for the design, budget and scale of the project. The hotel's siding will consist of stone veneer cladding; three types of wood siding (i.e., lx4 vertical wood siding, lx8 horizontal wood siding and 2x12 plan wood siding); natural patina metal panels; and stucco finishes. Roofing materials will consist of standing seam and corrugated metal with a durable gray finish. 1.47 Building materials should have these features: â€¢ Convey the quality and range of materials seen traditionally. â€¢ Reduce the perceived scale of the building and enhance visual interest of the facade. â€¢ Convey a human scale. â€¢ Have proven durability and weathering characteristics. 26 The hotel' s building materials reflect the quality and range of materials traditionally used in the City's downtown, reduce the perceived scale of the building and enhance its visual interest, covey a human scale, and have proven durability and weathering characteristics within the City' s climate. 1.48 A building or additions should reflect the quality and variation in materials seen traditionally. The hotel' s building materials re fleet the quality and variation traditionally used in buildings in the City' s downtown. 1.49 Where contemporary materials are used they shall be: â€¢ High quality in durability and finish. â€¢ Detailed to convey a human scale. â€¢ Compatible with a traditional masonry palette. All building materials are durable and of high quality, designed for commercial use and low maintenance, convey a human scale, and are compatible with a traditional masonry palette. 1.50 Materials used for third floor accommodation set back from the street facade(s) should be more subdued than the primary facades. This criteria is not applicable. g) Paving and Landscaping 1.51 Paving and Landscaping should be designed to complement and enhance the immediate setting of the building and area. The hotel's proposed hardscape and landscaping complement and enhance the visual appearance of the immediate site area. 27 A Legal Tabs Co. 1-800-322-3022 Recycled ~~ Stock # DOA-5-S APPENDIX A 1 1 Legal Tabs Co. 1-800-322-3022 Â© Stock#DO-10-S EXHIBIT CITY OF ASPEN PRE-APPLICATION CONFERENCE SUMMARY . LANNER: Jessica Garrow, 429.2780 DATE: July 3, 2015 PROJECT: 709 E Durant, Sky Hotel Redevelopment OWNER: Aspen Club Lodge Properties, LLC REPRESENTATIVE: Sunny Vann REQUEST: Planned Development - Detail Review; Commercial Design Final Review DESCRIPTION: The owner of the Sky Hotel, located at 709 E Durant, received approvals from City Council to redevelop the property with an updated lodge (Ordinance 39, Series 2014). Following a Planned Development - Project Review approval from City Council, a Detail Review is required. This is a new application and is reviewed by the Planning & Zoning Commission. The purpose of the Detail Review is to finalize all of the details of the project, including final landscaping, drainage, and materials. Below are links to the Land Use Application form and Land Use Code for your convenience: Land Use App: http://www.aspenpitkin.com/Portals/0/docs/City/Comdev/Apps%20and%20Fees/2013%20land%20use%20app%20form. p Â§!f Land Use Code: http:#www.aspenpitkin.com/Departments/Community-Development/Planning-and-Zoning/Title-26-Land-Use-Code/ Commercial, Lodging and Historic District Design Objectives and Guidelines: ttp://www.aspenpitkin.com/Departments/Community-DevelopmenUPIanning-and-Zoning/Current-Planning/ Relevant Land Use Code Section(s): 26.304 Common Development Review Procedures, including Neighborhood Outreach 26.412 Commercial Design Review 26.445 Planned Development 26.575.020 Calculations and Measurements 26.710.190 Lodge zone district Review by: Staff for completeness Review agencies for compliance Planning and Zoning Commission Commercial Design Reviews, and Planned Development - Detail Review, Public Hearing: Yes, at Planning and Zoning Commission Neighborhood Outreach: Required Prior to first Public Hearing Planning Fees: $4,550 for 14 hours of staff time. Any unbilled portion of this deposit will be refunded at the conclusion of the case. Additional staff hours, if needed, will be billed at $325 per hour. ASLU Planned Development 709 E Durant Parcel ID: 2437-18-280-001 1 Referrals: Parks @ $975 each Engineering @ $265 per hour . otal Deposit: $5,790 To apply, submit the following information: Il Completed Land Use Application and signed fee agreement. O Pre-application Conference Summary (this document). O Total deposit for review of the application. Il Street address and legal description of the parcel on which development is proposed to occur, consisting of a current (no older than 6 months) certificate from a title insurance company, an ownership and encumbrance report, or attorney licensed to practice in the State of Colorado, listing the names of all owners of the property, and all mortgages, judgments, liens, easements, contracts and agreements affecting the parcel, and demonstrating the owner's right to apply for the Development Application. Il Applicant's name, address and telephone number in a letter signed by the applicant that states the name, address and telephone number of the representative authorized to act on behalf of the applicant. 0 A site improvement survey (no older than a year from submittal) including topography and vegetation showing the current status of the parcel certified by a registered land surveyor by licensed in the State of Colorado. Il HOA Compliance form (Attached) 0 Documentation showing the proposal meets all Transportation Mitigation Requirements as outlined in the City's Transportation Impact Analysis Guidelines and Mitigation Tool, available online at: http://www.aspenpitkin.com/Departments/Community-Development/Planning-and-Zoning/Recent-Code- Amendments/. A copy of the tool showing trips generated and the chosen mitigation measures should be included with the application. O A written description of the proposal and an explanation in written, graphic, or model form of how the proposed development complies with the review standards relevant to the development application. 1 Il Written responses to all review criteria. Il An 81/2" by 11"vicinity map locating the parcel within the City of Aspen. O -11 Copies of the complete application packet and, if applicable, associated drawings O List of adjacent property owners within 300' for public hearing 0 A digital copy of the application provided in pdf file format. 0 A sketch up model will be required for the public hearing. 2 Disclaimer: he foregoing summary is advisory in nature only and is not binding on the City. The summary is based on current .oning, which is subject to change in the future, and upon factual representations that may or may not be accurate. The summary does not create a legal or vested right. 3 2 0% Legal Tabs Co 1-800-322-3022 * Stock# DO-10-S EXHIBIT 3 g PROFORMA TITLE REPORT SCHEDULE A 1. Effective Date: June 9, 2015 at 8:00 AM Case No. PCT23970W3 2. Policy or Policies to be issued: Proposed Insured: PROFORMA 3. Title to the FEE SIMPLE estate or interest in the land described or referred to in this Commitment is at the effective date hereof vested in: ASPEN CLUB LODGE PROPERTIES, LLC, A DELAWARE LIMITED LIABILITY COMPANY 4. The land referred to in this Commitment is situated in the County of PITKIN State of COLORADO and is described as follows: See Attached Exhibit "A" PITKIN COUNTY TITLE, INC. 601 E. HOPKINS, ASPEN, CO. 81611 970-925-1766 Phone/970-925-6527 Fax 877-217-3158 Toll Free AUTHORIZED AGENT Countersigned: 0 4 4)0~- EXHIBIT "A" LEGAL DESCRIPTION PARCELI WOODSTONE INN CONDOMINIUMS, according to the Condominium Map thereof filed March 11,1983 in Plat Book 14 at Page 45 through 49, inclusive, at Reception No. 248609 and as further defined and described in the Condominium Declaration for Woodstone Inn Condominiums recorded March 11, 1983 in Book 441 at Page 814 at Reception No. 248608. PARCEL 11 A non-exclusive easement and right-of-way for the purpose of ingress and egress over and across that certain parcel described in Long Form Easement Agreement unrecorded, notice of which is given by Short Form Easement Agreement recorded April 25, 1977 in Book 327 at Page 777. PARCEL 111 Encroachment License Agreements for the purposes stated therein recorded September 3, 1976 in Book 316 at Page 232, April 30, 1982 in Book 425 at Page 907, in Book 425 at Page 913, in Book 425 at Page 919 and recorded November 13, 1985 in Book 498 at Page 909. SCHEDULE B - SECTION 1 REQUIREMENTS THIS REPORT IS FURNISHED FOR INFORMATIONAL PURPOSES ONLY, IT IS NOT A CONTRACT TO ISSUE TITLE INSURANCE AND SHALL NOT BE CONSTRUED AS SUCH. IN THE EVENT A PROPOSED INSURED IS NAMED THE COMPANY HEREBY RESERVES THE RIGHT TO MAKE ADDITIONAL REQUIREMENTS AND/OR EXCEPTIONS AS DEEMED NECESSARY. THE RECIPIENT OF THIS INFORMATIONAL REPORT HEREBY AGREES THAT THE COMPANY HAS ISSUED THIS REPORT BY THEIR REQUEST AND ALTHOUGH WE BELIEVE ALL INFORMATION CONTAINED HEREIN IS ACCURATE AND CORRECT, THE COMPANY SHALL NOT BE CHARGED WITH ANY FINANCIAL LIABILITY SHOULD THAT PROVE TO BE INCORRECT AND THE COMPANY IS NOT OBLIGATED TO ISSUE ANY POLICIES OF TITLE INSURANCE 1. A current survey, certified by a Registered Colorado Land Sun/eyor must be delivered to, approved and retained by the Company 2. Release by the Public Trustee of the, Deed of Trust from . ASPEN CLUB LODGE PROPERTIES, LLC, A DELAWARE LIMITED LIABILITY COMPANY to the Public Trustee of the County of PITKIN for the use of : HARTFORD LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY original amount : $15,000,000.00 dated : April 2,2007 recorded : April 2,2007 reception no. 536167 Assignment of Rents and Leases given in connection with the above Deed of Trust recorded April 3,2007 as Reception No. 536168. Modification Agreement changing various terms of the Deed of Trust above was recorded May 1, 2012 as Reception No. 588687. Duly acknowledged Assignment of the Deed of Trust recorded January 16, 2013 as Reception No. 596209 assigning the Deed of Trust to MASSACHUSETTS MUTUAL LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY. 3. Termination Statement for Financing Statement from ASPEN CLUB LODGE PROPERTIES, LLC, debtor(s) to HARTFORD LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY, secured party, filed on April 3,2007 as Reception No. 536169, continuation recorded October 19, 2011 as Reception No. 583683.. (Continued) SCHEDULE B - SECTION 1 REQUIREMENTS - Continued 4. Release by the Public Trustee of the, Deed of Trust from : ASPEN CLUB LODGE PROPERTIES, LLC, A DELAWARE LIMITED LIABILITY COMPANY to the Public Trustee of the County of PITKIN for the use of : REDWOOD COMMERCIAL MORTGAGE CORPORATION original amount : $16,000,000.00 dated : February 5, 2013 recorded : February 7,2013 reception no. : 596820 Assignment of Rents and Leases given in connection with the above Deed of Trust recorded February 7, 2013 as Reception No. 596821. Consent, Subordination, Non-Disturbance and Attornment Agreement recorded February 7, 2013 as Reception No. 596822. Duly acknowledged Assignment of the Deed of Trust recorded March 22, 2013 as Reception No. 597977 assigning the Deed of Trust to WELLS FARGO BANK, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, AS TRUSTEE FOR THE REGISTERED HOLDERS OF J.P. MORGAN CHASE COMMERCIAL MORTGAGE SECURITIES TRUST 2013-C10. 5. Termination Statement for Financing Statement from ASPEN CLUB LODGE PROPERTIES, LLC, debtor(s) to REDWOOD COMMERCIAL MORTGAGE CORPORATION, secured party, filed on February 7, 2013 as Reception No. 596823, Assignment of the Financing Statement recorded March 22, 2013 as Reception No. 597979 assigning the Financing Statement to WELLS FARGO BANK, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, AS TRUSTEE FOR THE REGISTERED HOLDERS OF J.P. MORGAN CHASE COMMERCIAL MORTGAGE SECURITIES TRUST 2013-C10.. 6. Copy of the Registration duly stamped by the Secretary of State of the State of DELAWARE evidencing registration of ASPEN CLUB LODGE PROPERTIES, LLC and Statement of Authority and a copy of the Operating Agreement of ASPEN CLUB LODGE PROPERTIES, LLC evidencing the names and addresses of the Members and/or Managers authorized to act on behalf of said Limited Liability Company. 7. Duly executed and acknowledged Deed, From : ASPEN CLUB LODGE PROPERTIES, LLC, A DELAWARE LIMITED LIABILITY COMPANY To :PROFORMA 8. Evidence satisfactory to the Company that the Real Estate Transfer Tax as established by Ordinance No. 20 (Series of 1979) and Ordinance No. 13 (Series of 1990) has been paid or exempted. 9. Certificate of nonforeign status executed by the transferor(s). (This instrument is not required to be recorded) 10. Completion of Form DR 1083 regarding the withholding of Colorado Tax on the sale by certain persons, corporations and firms selling Real Property in the State of Colorado. (This instrument is not required to be recorded) 11. Evidence satisfactory to the Company that the Declaration of Sale, Notice to County Assessor as required by H.B. 1288 has been complied with. (This instrument is not required to be recorded, but must be delivered to and retained by the Assessors Office in the County in which the property is situated) SCHEDULE B SECTION 2 EXCEFTIONS The policy or policies to be issued will contain exceptions to the following unless the same are disposed of to the satisfaction of the Company: 1. Rights or claims of parties in possession not shown by the public records. 2. Easements, or claims of easements, not shown by the public records. 3. Discrepancies, conflicts in boundary lines, shortage in area, encroachments, any facts which a correct survey and inspection of the premises would disclose and which are not shown by the public records. 4. Any lien, or right to a lien, for services, labor, or material heretofore or hereafter furnished, imposed by law and not shown by the public records. 5. Defects, liens, encumbrances, adverse claims or other matters, if any, created, first appearing in the public records or attaching subsequent to the effective date hereof but prior to the date the proposed insured acquires of record for value the estate or interest or mortgage thereon covered by this Commitment. 6. Taxes due and payable; and any tax, special assessment, charge or lien imposed for water or sewer service or for any other special taxing district. 7. Reservations and exceptions as set forth in the Deed from the City of Aspen recorded in Book 59 at Page 242 and 482 providing as follows: "That no title shall be hereby acquired to any mine of gold, silver, cinnabar or copper or to any valid mining claim or possession held under existing laws". 8. Mineral rights as set forth in Deeds recorded May 13, 1891 in Book 92 at Page 104 and June 10, 1891 in Book 98 at Page 497. 9. Terms, conditions, provisions, obligations and all matters as set forth in Ordinance No. 12, Series of 1961 by City of Aspen recorded February 16, 1962 in Book 196 at Page 521. 10. Terms, conditions, provisions and obligations as set forth in Encroachment License Agreements recorded September 3, 1976 in Book 316 at Page 232, April 30, 1982 in Book 425 at Page 907, Book 425 at Page 913, Book 425 at Page 919 and November 13, 1985 in Book 498 at Page 909. 11. Terms, conditions, provisions and obligations as set forth in Agreement recorded March 15, 1977 in Book 325 at Page 939. 12. Terms, conditions, provisions and obligations as set forth in Short Form Easement Agreement recorded April 25,1977 in Book 327 at Page 777. 13. Terms, conditions, provisions and obligations as set forth in Parking Lot Lease recorded March 11,1983 in Book 441 at Page 803. 14. Terms, conditions, obligations and all matters as set forth in Statement of Exception from the Full Subdivision Process recorded March 11, 1983 in Book 441 at Page 811 15. Terms, conditions, provisions, obligations, easements, restrictions and assessments as set forth in the Condominium Declaration for Woodstone Inn Condominium recorded March 11, 1983 in Book 441 at Page 814, and Designation of Successor recorded September 25, 1985 in Book 495 at Page 698, deleting therefrom any restrictions indicating preference, limitation or discrimination based on race, color, religion, sex, handicap, familial status or national origin. 16. Easements, rights of way and all matters as disclosed on Plat of subject property recorded March 11, 1983 in Plat Book 14 at Page 45. 17. Terms, conditions, provisions and obligations as set forth in Agreement recorded April 10,1985 in Book 484 at Page 444. (Continued) SCHEDULE B SECTION 2 EXCEPTIONS - (Continued) 18. Terms, conditions, provisions and obligations as set forth in Statement of Variances recorded February 12, 1988 in Book 556 at Page 886, March 30, 1988 in Book 559 at Page 909 and March 30, 1988 in Book 559 at Page 911. 19. Terms, conditions, provisions, obligations and all matters as set forth in Resolution of the Aspen Planning and Zoning Commission recorded November 20, 2014 as Reception No. 615545 as Resolution No. 15-2014. 20. Terms, conditions, provisions and obligations as set forth in Notice of Approval recorded December 23, 2014 as Reception No. 616244 21. Terms, conditions, provisions, obligations and all matters as set forth in Ordinance No. 39, Series of 2014 by Aspen City Council recorded February 12, 2015 as Reception No. 617367. ' 22. Terms, conditions, provisions and obligations as set forth in Notice of Approval recorded July 9,2015 as Reception No. 621405 3 f y Legal Tabs Co 1-800-322-3022 Â© Stock#DO-10-S EXHIBIT a June 12, 2014 Ms. Jessica Garrow Community Development Department 130 South Galena Street Aspen, Colorado 81611 Re: Permission to Represent Dear Ms. Garrow: Please consider this letter authorization for Sunny Vann of Vann Associates, LLC, Planning Consultants, to represent us in the processing of our application for the redevelopment of the Sky Hotel. Mr. Vann is hereby authorized to act on our behalf with respect to all matters reasonably pertaining to the aforementioned application. Should you have any questions, or if we can be of any further assistance, please do not hesitate to call. -Yours truly, ASPEN CLUB LODGE PROPERTIES, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company By: Northridge Capital, LLC, 2 its Manager David W. JacksonSEres*nt d:\oidc\bus\city.ltriltr60814.jgl j 1 4 0.- i Legal Tabs Co. 1-800-322-3022 1* Stock#DO-10-S EXHIBIT 4 ATTACHMENT 2 -LAND USE APPLICATION JECT: Name: 4#<W +Tac- 1<21,r-,evety~rH 61-rr Location: 76>9 46-7- râ„¢277,9.47- 44 e . (Indicate street address, lot & block number, legal description where appropriate) Parcel ID # (REQUIRED) 7,737/868(3<*34 APPLICANT: ~ Name -4*.aÂ« 043/C~ 03,2#*0 ,/78922rlÂ»66~ 6.6:Le Address: do /4617}4111 7*e cAFÂ¥-T+. dic //29 riera g Phone #: U\,4, 9>rre /* , CV*3 42*-72(3Â° REPRESENTATIVE: Name: 40-1 LK *94#- 1.\AHhl AfAZAÂ«Td- aâ‚¬ 4-Â¢-0 Address: r.al rusz +827 , t546*Jr: CO egab ' Phone #: 9561 49125 TYPE OF APPLICATION: (please check all that apply): 1 GMQS Exemption E ponceptual PUD El Temporary Use C GMQS Allotment [9' Final PUD (& PUD Amendment) El Text/Map Amendment 3 Special Review U Subdivision U Conceptual SPA 3 ESA -8040 Greenline, Stream U Subdivision Exemption (includes U Final SPA (& SPA Margin, Hallam Lake Bluff, condominiumization) Amendment) Mountain View Plane 9-Commercial Design Review U Lot Split U Small Lodge Conversion/ Expansion U Residential Design Variance U Lot Line Adjustment E Other: U Conditional Use EXISTING CONDITIONS: (description ofexisting buildings, uses, previous approvals, etc.) Â£mee ArrucÂ«-r'41 PROPOSAL: (description ofproposed buildings, uses, modifications, etc.) 4,/3/3 ,Â·APALKL.ty /604 Have ou attached the following? FEES DUE: $1~ 7te> - ' F-'Â·jji~-Application Conference Summary [ ~ttachment #1, Signed Fee Agreement L 11$:sponse to Attachment #3, Dimensional Requirements Form [2'Response to Attachment #4, Submittal Requirements- Including Written Responses to Review Standards E 3-D Model for large project plans that are larger than 8.5" X 11" must be folded. A disk with an electric copy of all written text crosoft Word Format) must be submitted as part of the application. Large scale projects should include an electronic 3-D model. Your pre-application conference summary will indicate ifyou must submit a 3-D model. F 5 i Legal Tabs Co. 1-800-322-3022 @ Stock#DO-10-S EXHIBIT [7-1 ATTACHMENT 3 DIMENSIONAL REQUIREMENTS FORM Project. â€¢4/Â¥ i //237~ /gde/'210'254Â£y-t-HEH7- Applicant: 'M=ma,4 64-324'% c-53'0125 f trgr~trrheS,CZA- Location: 789 eÂ«ST- r-><NT#,4-r 25 Zone District: 4-â€ž429-06*a Lot Size: 4-t, 449 Lot Area: 6~ ArruokrleN (for the purposes o f calculating Floor Area, Lot Area may be reduced for areas within the high water mark, easements, and steep slopes. Please refer to the definition of Lot Area in the Municipal Code.) Commercial net leasable: Existing: ff~Z.09 Proposed: 2; 9,&46 Number of residential units: Existing: 0 Proposed: Number of bedrooms: Existing: Proposed: 27 Proposed % of demolition (Historic properties only): DIMENSIONS: 4=EZE Â«rpcacÂ«ne,4 Floor Area: Existing.- Allowable: Proposed: Principal bldg. height: Existing: Allowable: Proposed: Access. bldg. height: Existing: Allowable: Proposed: On-Site parking: Existing: Required: Proposed: % Site coverage: Existing: Required: Proposed: % Open Space: Existing: Required: Proposed: Front Setback: Existing. Required: Proposed: Rear Setback: Existing. Required: Proposed: Combined F/R: Existing: Required: Proposed: Side Setback: Existing: Required: Proposed. Side Setback: Existing: Required: Proposed: Combined Sides: Existing.- Required: Proposed. Distance Between Existing Required: Proposed. Buildings Existing non-conformities or encroachments: Variations requested: '4~ '427Â£/qf/6#4 6 ' ~ Legal Tabs Co. 1-800-322-3022 Â© Stock#DO-10-S COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT Agreement to Pay Application Fees An agreement between the City of Aspen ("City") and Prope.gy Aspen Club Lodge Properties, LLC Phone No.: (202) 625-7890 Owner ("1) Email: johnsarpa@johnsarpa.com Address of Billin9 Aspen Club Lodge Properties, LLC Property: 709 East Durant Avenue Address: c/o Northridge Capital, LLC (subject of (send bills here) 1101 30th Street. NW, Suite 150 application) Washington, DC 20007 I understand that the City has adopted, via Ordinance No. , Series of 2011, review fees for Land Use applications and the payment of these fees is a condition precedent to determining application completeness. I understand that as the property owner that I am responsible for paying all fees for this development application. For flat fees and referral fees: I agree to pay the following fees for the services indicated. I understand that these flat fees are non-refundable. 975 Parks 0 Select Dept $, flat fee for . $. flat fee for 0 Select Review $ flat fee for Select Dept 0 $ flat fee for For deposit cases only: The City and I understand that because of the size, nature or scope of the proposed project, it is not possible at this time to know the full extent or total costs involved in processing the application. 1 understand that additional costs over and above the deposit may accrue. I understand and agree that it is impracticable for City staff to complete processing, review, and presentation of sufficient information to enable legally required findings to be made for project consideration, unless invoices are paid in full. The City and I understand and agree that invoices mailed by the City to the above listed billing address and not returned to the City shall be considered by the City as being received by me. I agree to remit payment within 30 days of presentation of an invoice by the City for such services. I have read, understood, and agree to the Land Use Review Fee Policy including consequences for non-payment. I agree to pay the following initial deposit amounts for the specified hours of staff time. I understand that payment of a deposit does not render an application complete or compliant with approval criteria. If actual recorded costs exceed the initial deposit, I agree to pay additional monthly billings to the City to reimburse the City for the processing of my application at the hourly rates hereinafter stated. $4,550 14 deposit for hours of Community Development Department staff time. Additional time above the deposit amount will be billed at $325 per hour. $265 1 deposit for hours of Engineering Department staff time. Additional time above the deposit amount will be billed at $265 per hour. City of Aspen: Property Owner: *beak} 011:rb Ler>te rnÂ©reryÂ·,66 Chris Bendon Community Development Director Name: ~L~-_._ .-3-<.1 - Title: ~9(2125/13 PAT City Use: 5790 Fees Due: $ Received: $ January. 2013 City 01'Aspen 1130 S. Galega St. 1 (970) 920-5090 7 Legal Tabs Co. 1-800-322-3022 * Stock#DO-10-S EXHIBIT 11 7 COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT Homeowner Association Compliance Policy All land use applications within the City of Aspen are required to include a Homeowner Association Compliance Form (this form) certifying the scope of work included in the land use application complies with all applicable covenants and homeowner association policies, The certification must be signed bv the propertv owner or Attorney representing the Droperlv owner. Property Name: ASPEN CLUB LODGE PROPERTIES, LLC Owner ("17: Email: Phone No.: Address of Property: 709 E. DURANT AVENUE, ASPEN, COLORADO, 81611 (subject of application) I certify as follows: (pick one) Â® This property is not subject to a homeowners association or othor form of private covenoat There is a 1982 Condominium Declaration and Map U This property is subject to a homeowners association or private covenant and the improvements proposed in this land use application do not require approval by the homeowners association or covenant beneficiary, El This property is subject to a homeowners association or private covenant and the improvements proposed in this land use applicalion have been approved by the homeowners association or covenant beneficiary. Evidence of approval is attached, I understand this policy and I understand the City of Aspen does not interpret, enforce, or manage the applicability, meaning or effect of private covenants or homeowner association rules or bylaws. I understand that this document is a public document. Owner signature: date: Owner printed name: or, /7 _z ~,Atd ~ate: 6~/Off/fl Attorney signature: f Â»44 14(,AN,j 5 - Attorney printed name: . Vt Ol ) 8 Legal Tabs Co. 1-800-322-3022 Â© Stock#DO-10-S EXHIBIT CE] DURANT AH LLC SARGENT ELIZABETH VAUSE FAMILY TRU BOX 4068 PO BOX 4450 3020 PLAZA DE MON ASPEN, CO 81612 ASPEN, CO 816124450 LAS VEGAS, NV 89102 ANDINA SUPER LLC SMALLPAGE LEASING LLC BANKS LIVING TRUST PO BOX 1177 6316 HUMPHREYS ST PO BOX 242 MANLY NSW AUSTRALIA 1655, HARAHAN, LA 70123 MIDLAND, TX 79702 THOMAS VICTORIA BLUE SKY TRUST ASPEN MOUNTAIN CHALET LLC 835 E DURANT AVE #1 1024 E HOPKINS #17 GPO BOX 338 ASPEN, CO 81611 ASPEN, CO 81611 DARWIN NORTHERN TERRITORY AUSTRALIA 0801, VIEREGG ROBERT TODD TRUST MAKINEN MICHAEL & WINNIFRED B CHATEAU CHAUMONT 17/18 LLC 2221 WYNDANCE WAY 851 UNIVERSITY AVE 7 MCCULLOUGH PL NORTHBROOK, IL 60062 PALO ALTO, CA 94301 RYE, NY 10580 POLLOCK RANDALL LLC CAVES KAREN W HENDRICKS SIDNEY J & YOLANDE EVERHAI PO BOX 950 1 BARRENGER CT 6614 LAKEVILLE RD ASPEN, CO 81612 NEWPORT BEACH, CA 92660 PETALUMA, CA 94954-9256 RUBY RICHARD L TRUST RANDALL WILLIAM C DDS SOUTHEAST HARBOR FARMS LLLP 30150 TELEGRAPH RD STE 300 10303 ORCHID LN 51 ARCH WAY BINGHAM FARMS, MI 48025 PINE RIVER, MN 56474 CALISTOGA, CA 94515 HE REINERT HOLDINGS CORP CHEN LINDA P BELL NORMAN D 161 MAC LAREN ST 215 E 79TH ST #4E 215 E 79TH ST #4E OTTOWA ONTARIO NEW YORK, NY 10021 NEW YORK, NY 10075 CANADA K2P 0K8, RODRIGUEZ/FERNANDEZ FAMILY TRUST HEFFNER KRISTIN A SARICK SAMUEL & ESTHER 4020 ENSENADA AVE 700 S UTE AVE #102 95 BARBER GREEN RD MIAMI, FL 33133 ASPEN, CO 81611 DON MILLS ONTARIO CANADA M3CE9, ALPS PARTNERS GAINES SUSAN R ABRAMSON FAMILY REV TRUST PO BOX 703806 700 S UTE AVE 181 SOUTH AVE DALLAS, TX 75370-3806 ASPEN, CO 81611 ALAMO, CA 94507 PRIS VENTURES LLC ROSS JOHN F SKILKEN STEVE & LYNNE 8818 TELLER AVE #130 7600 CLAYTON RD 383 S THIRD ST IRVINE, CA 92612 ST LOUIS, MO 63117 COLUMBUS, OH 43215 BERSCH BLANCHE TRUST 50% BERSCH ELLEN TRUST 50% BERSCH BLANCHE TRUST ,2 YOAKUM DR 9642 YOAKUM DR 9642 YOAKUM DR wEVERLY HILLS, CA 90210 BEVERLY HILLS, CA 90210 BEVERLY HILLS, CA 90210 DAY ARTHUR S BLISS ELIOT & ANN BOHMONT LLC 3007 BAY SHORE RD 19130 SYLVAN ST 1010 WATHAM ST SARASOTA, FL 34234 RESEDA, CA 91335 BROOKHAVEN 16 LEXINGTON, MA 024218061 LAMONT ADA J DENNIS IRREVOCABLE TRUST PON FAMILY ASPEN 133 E 80TH ST 77 MONTEREY PINE 2633 RICHARDSON DR #10-D NEW YORK, NY 10075 NEW PORT COAST, CA 92657 CHARLOTTE, NC 28211 VALERIE ASPEN LLC SHELLIST MARTIN SHEPHERD BETH ANN 150 E 69TH ST #20B 1707 1/2 POST OAK BLVD #262 11504 CANTON DR NEW YORK, NY 10021 HOUSTON, TX 77056 STUDIO CITY, CA 91604 SCHOETTLE SHARON FOXS LEGACY LLC WALLEN-OSTERAA REV LIVING TRUST 1707 1/2 POST OAK BLVD #179 101 S MILL ST #200 36 OCEAN VISTA HOUSTON, TX 77056 ASPEN, CO 81611 NEWPORT BEACH, CA 92660 SEGUIN WILLIAM L & MARILYN A BRONSON RICHARD L TRUST 50% BRONSON BONNIE L TRUST 50% ' PO BOX 4274 4510 NE DELAMAR PL 4510 NE DELAMAR PL ASPEN, CO 816124274 LEES SUMMIT, MO 64064 LEES SUMMIT, MO 64064 HUNKE CARLTON J LVG TRST MJM AMENDED & RESTATED TRUST 81611 INVESTMENTS LLC 408 N 1ST ST #507 1776 SOUTH LN PO BOX 1376 MINNEAPOLIS, MN 55401 NORTHBROOK, IL 60062 ASPEN, CO 81612 CALGI RAYMOND D KANN RONALD K & W PROPERTIES INC 134 TEWKESBURY RD 217 OHARA MANOR DR 728 W CANAL ST SCARSDALE, NY 10583 PITTSBURGH, PA 15238 NEW SMYRNA BEACH, FL 32168 ROGENESS FAMILY TRUST ECCHYMOSIS LLC ROSS JOHN F 3046 COLONY DR 4802 E 2ND ST # 2 7600 CLAYTON RD SAN ANTONIO, TX 78230 LONG BEACH, CA 90803 SAINT LOUIS, MO 63117 ANZ NORBERT ALEXANDER BARGE RENE TRUST VARADY LOTHAR M & CHERYL G ISERHOFSTR 15 408 31ST ST 5036 MAUNALANI CIR FRANKFURT 60313 GERMANY, NEWPORT BEACH, CA 92663 HONOLULU, HI 96816 AWALL350 LLC GRUENEWALD DAVID F REVOCABLE LIVING SHNEIDERMAN BEN A TRUST 50% ) BLANCA AVE 63 ROBINWOOD DR 7710 WOODMONTAVE#1112 , AMPA, FL 33606 LITTLE ROCK, AR 72227 BETHESDA, MD 20814 PREECE JENNIFER J TRUST 50% CHAIKEN WILLIAM SATKUNAS THOMAS P 7710 WOODMONT AVE#1112 2030 S OCEAN DR APT 1723 0096 HOPI BETHESDA, MD 20814 HALLANDALE BEACH, FL 33009-6614 CARBONDALE, CO 81623 WATERS JOSEPH D & LESLIE T SUMMERGREEN LLC PARTRIDGE JAMES J & JEAN C 450 S ORIGINAL ST #2 715 E DURANT AVE #8 361 N AWAHNEE RD ASPEN, CO 816112073 ASPEN, CO 81611 LAKE FOREST, IL 60045 WEIGAND 122 LLC MAVROVIC ERNA IACONO FAMILY INVESTMENTS LLC 301 N MAI N ST #600 530 E 72ND ST APT 15-C 5845 E PLACITA DE LA ZUERENCIA WICHITA, KS 67202 NEWYORK, NY 10021 TUCSON, AZ 85750-1242 CCI-ASPEN I LP DURANT MALL PROP LLC GREWAL JASJIT SINGH 800 BRAZOS ST #600 39 MOUNTAIN LAUREL DR 1 ECHO CANYON RD AUSTIN, TX 78701 ASPEN, CO 81611 PAGOSA SPRINGS, CO 81147 LEINER MICHAEL & ROSE ANN VALERIO JAMES & LANETTE LIVINGSTON DAVID R PO BOX 11539 PO BOX 1376 7100 GLADYS DR SE ASPEN, CO 81612 ASPEN, CO 81612 GRAND RAPIDS, MI 49546 BRADLEY EDWARD JR JACOBY JON E M 283 ASPEN LLC 263 80TH ST PO BOX 3417 4809 COLE AVE #347 , BROOKLYN, NY 11209 LITTLE ROCK, AR 72203 DALLAS, TX 75205 SHIFRIN GEORGE LEINER MICHAEL EAST DURANT LLC PO BOX 3434 PO BOX 11539 323 N PACIFIC COAST HWY BASALT, CO 81621 ASPEN, CO 81612 SOL-ANA BEACH, CA 920751130 SEAY GERALD R HOFFMAN FRANCIS P JOSHUA & CO 320 TANGIER AVE 7577 FOREST BEACH RD 300 S HUNTER ST PALM BEACH, FL 334803518 WATERVLIET, MI 49098-8304 ASPEN, CO 81611 UITUS CAPITAL LLC WILSON JOSEPH B UND 50% INT AJAX SLOPESIDE LLC 0 E DURANT # E8 39 MOUNTAIN LAUREL DR 240 RAMSAY RD ASPEN, CO 816112071 ASPEN, CO 81611 DEERFIELD, IL 60015-3438 PECKHAM THOMAS C KELLER KURT E SPENCER DAVID B BOX 9766 PO BOX 840 ASPEN, CO 81612 ASPEN, CO 81612 1217 ROYAL ST #1 N EW ORLEANS, LA 70116 ROBINSON STEPHANIE T SHEA SARAH H TRUST POLAK-ASPEN LLC 107 ASPEN MOUNTAIN RD UNIT 9 655 BREA CANYON RD 2828 N COUNTRY CLUB ROAD # 105 ASPEN, CO 81611 WALNUT, CA 91789 TUCSON, AZ 85716 PECK ANTHONY Z & PAULA RICE GLORY US LLC SPAR CONSOLIDATED MINING & DEVELOPM 9171 WILSHIRE BLVD #400 9826 WEST BROADVIEW DRIVE 2009 MARKET ST i BEVERLY HILLS, CA 90210 BAY HARBOR, FL 33154 DENVER, CO 80205-2022 GADA 777 REVOCABLE LIVING TRUST COMBO VENTURE LLC ASPEN SKIING COMPANY LLC PO BOX 2061 2828 N HARWOOD ST #1700 PO BOX 1248 ASPEN, CO 81612 DALLAS, TX 75201 ASPEN, CO 81612 ASPEN VALLEY LAND TRUST CITY OF ASPEN SOLOMON FAMILY LIMITED PARTNERSHIP 320 MAIN ST #204 130 S GALENA ST 9313 RAPLEY PRESERVE DR CARBONDALE, CO 81623 ASPEN, CO 81611 POTOMAC, MD 20854 WHITE SNOW TRAIL LLC RULY HOLDINGS PTY LTD ASPEN MOUNTAIN PARTNERS LLC 9313 RAPLEY PRESERVE DR PO BOX 2964 730 E DURANT AVE POTOMAC, MD 20854 ASPEN, CO 81612 ASPEN, CO 81611 AJAX INVESTMENTS LLC ROBINSON F GEORGE JR MAYER WILLIAM E 730 E DURANT AVE PO BOX 7906 PO BOX 4462 ASPEN, CO 81611 ASPEN, CO 81612 ASPEN , CO 81612 M & M INVESTMENTS BOUTON REV TRUST GODFREY BRUCE FAM TRST 50% 679 BRUSH CREEK RD 1170 SACRAMENTO ST #11A 195 RUSSELL RD ASPEN, CO 81611 SAN FRANCISCO, CA 941081967 PRINCETON, NJ 08540 GODFREY LESLI L FAM TRST 50% CROCKETT RUFUS 730 DURANTG12 LLC 1041 S HIGH ST PO BOX 3837 1233 EDLIN PL DENVER, CO 80209 ASPEN, CO 81612 MINNEAPOLIS, MN 55416 RRY JAMES H & MARGERY DEUTZ RED FLOWER PROP CO PTNSHP 450 ORIGINAL CONDO ASSOC O BOX 3382 575 MADISON AVE #1006 COMMON AREA ASPEN, CO 81612-3382 NEWYORK, NY 100222511 , 730 EAST DURANT CONDO ASSOC 777 UTE AT THE ASPEN ALPS ASSOC AJAX CONDO ASSOC MMON AREA COMMON AREA COMMON AREA ASPEN ALPS CONDO ASSOC UTE TRAIL TOWNHOUSES CONDO ASSOC CHATEAU CHAUMONT CONDO ASSOC PO BOX 1128 COMMON AREA 421 G AABC ASPEN, CO 81612 , ASPEN, CO 81611 CHATEAU DU MONT CONDO ASSOC CLARENDON CONDO ASSOC ARROWHEAD CONDO ASSOC 715 E DURANT AVE COMMON AREA COMMON AREA ASPEN, CO 81611 625 S WEST END ST ASPEN, CO 81611 ASPEN SQUARE CONDO ASSOC BLD B ASPEN SQUARE CONDO ASSOC BLD A ASPEN TOWNHOMES EAST COMMON AREA COMMON AREA COMMON AREA E COOPER AVE E COOPER AVE 835 E DURANT AVE ASPEN, CO 81611 ASPEN, CO 81611 ASPEN, CO 81611 DURANT MALL CONDO ASSOC GLORY HOLE CONDO ASSOC LE CLAIRVAUX TOWNHOUSES CONDO ASS( 1000 DOLORES WAY #B COMMON AREA COMMON AREA CARBONDALE, CO 816232251 525 S ORIGINAL ST 803 E DURANT AVE ASPEN, CO 81611 ASPEN, CO 81611 ASPEN ALPS WEST CONDO ASSOC JONA HOLDINGS INC GADA 777 REV LIVING TRUST 40% COMMON AREA PO BOX 163 PO BOX 2061 700 UTE AVE TORONTO ONTARIO CANADA M5K1 H6, ASPEN, CO 81612 ASPEN, CO 81611 COMBO VENTURE LLC 60% WALDRON K BRENT & CONSTANCE K CHAMBERLAIN BEVERLY M TRST 2828 N HARWOOD ST #1700 PO BOX 4900 3548 N BROOKHAVEN DALLAS, TX 75201 ASPEN, CO 81612 TUCSON, AZ 85718 CHATFIELD CHARLTON H CHERAMIE CAPITAL HOLDINGS LLC 21/22 CHERAMIE ALAN A 1/22 INT 12 CORRIGAN LN PO BOX 805 139 CHERAMIE LN GREENWICH, CT 06831 GOLDEN MEADOW LA 70357 GOLDEN MEADOW, LA 70357 CITY MARKET INC UG VENTURES LLC MITCHELL PROPERTY TRUST 1014 VINE ST 7TH FL PO BOX 2538 1 SOUTH ST #6 LEVEL 4 CINCINNATI, OH 45202 ASPEN, CO 81612 ST GEORGE PRIVATE HOSPITAL KOGARAHNSW AUSTRALIA 2217, LERON CHEMICALS CORP OLSON DOUG BOWERS BARBARA 01 WAUKEGAN RD #210 2601 W LAFAYETTE RD 2601 W LAFAYETTE RD BANNOCKBURN, IL 60015 ORONO, MN 55331 ORONO, MN 55331 PETERSON CHRISPY & JAMES E CLIFFORD MRS MARGARET JOAN EAGLE POINT PROPERTIES LLC MANGROVE THICKET BLVD 146 WILD TIGER RD PO BOX 1749 r-ONTE VEDRA BEACH, FL 320810747 BOULDER, CO 80302 ASPEN, CO 81612 BRENNAN ADRIENNE REV FAM TRUST NEPSA INVESTMENT GROUP PTY LTD ASPEN SQUARE 410 LP 919 GARDENIA WY 185 SPRING ST 1407 YONGE ST #200 CORONA DEL MAR, CA 92625 MELBOURNE VICTORIA TORONTO ONTARIO AUSTRALIA 3000, M4T IY7 CANADA, ASPEN WINGS PARTNERSHIP R & R INVESTMENTS BONCZEK ROBERT R 3481 SHORE DR 15238 OAK VALLEY RD PO BOX 2896 EXCELSIOR, MN 55331 RAMONA, CA 92065 CHAPEL HILL, NC 275152896 UNCAPHER BILL TRUSTEE REICH MELVIN L TRUST 80% REICH DANIEL S TRUST 20% PO BOX 2127 4609 SEASHORE DR 6 RINCON ST ' LA JOLLA, CA 92038 NEWPORT BEACH, CA 92663 IRVINE, CA 92702 DALY CAROL Y REV TRUST ALVARADO-RIOS HECTOR GORDON LEONARD & ELLEN 617 E COOPER PALMIRA 151 CUERNAVACA 12204 GALESVILLE DR ASPEN, CO 81611 MORELOS MEXICO 62499, GAITHERSBURG, MD 20878 KANTOR GARY L DAMASO PAULA M TRUST WEISS KATHY REV TRUST 2816 VISTA DEL SOL PO BOX 1225 1609 COUNTY ROAD 112 LAS VEGAS, NV 89120 ASPEN, CO 81612 CARBONDALE, CO 81623 LE CLAIRVAUX 5 LLC WEIGAND JOHNATHAN R TRUST 11/11/2014 CRAFT LESTER R JR 1501 ARDMORE BLVD STE 400 128 S OAKWOOD PO BOX 127 PITTSBURGH, PA 15221 WICHITA, KS 67218 BASALT, CO 81621 CORNELISSEN TOM SEELIG-BROWN BARBARA KRAJIAN RON 4753 N SHORE DR 18 HARVEST LN 617 E COOPER AVE #114 MOUND, MN 55364-9607 LONG VALLEY, NJ 07853 ASPEN, CO 81611 BATES NATHANIEL B TRUST UNCAPHER BILL BAISCH BARBARA D PO BOX 9909 PO BOX 2127 PO BOX 2127 ASPEN, CO 81612 LA JOLLA, CA 92038 LA JOLLA, CA 92038 LLA HENRY J BECKER ERNEST & KATHLEEN TRUST SIMUNOVICH JOHN & BRIGID COLETT- 7 4TH ST 8090 S DURANGO DR #115 PO BOX 47 MANHATTAN BEACH, CA 90266 LAS VEGAS, NV 89113 DROGHEDA IRELAND CO LOUTH, MILL IRON INVESTMENTS LLC SHOHET CAROLYN S SMALL RESTON LLC BOX 64 PO BOX 64 7311 ARROWOOD RD vARLISLE, MA 01741 CARLISLE, MA 01741 BETHESDA, MA 20817 CLARENDON IV LLC CLARENDON LLC SCHNEIDER ROBERT C 2034 N CLARK ST PO BOX 177 3003 S ONG ST CHICAGO, IL 60614 BONDI JUNCTION NSW 1355 AUSTRALIA, AMARILLO, TX 79109 BOWERS ANN S TRUST RAINEY J WALKER & GILLIAN GRIFFITH N MICHELLE & C PERRY JR 1664 WAVERLEY STREET 2 PALMERSTON VILLAS 663 FOREST BLVD PALO ALTO, CA 94301 RATHMINES INDIANAPOLIS, IN 46240 DUBLIN 6 IRELAND, SHIRK JAMES A & LINDA S EPSTEIN ASPEN TRUST LATTERMAN EARL M QPRT PO BOX 1549 1900 RITTENHOUSE SQ #8A 5000 5TH AVE APT 306 BLOOMINGTON, IL 61702 PHILADELPHIA, PA 19103 PITTSBURGH, PA 152322150 IONTACH LLC WEINBERG JUDD A TRUST CRAZY WOMAN INVESTMENTS LLC PO BOX 21176 401 N MICHIGAN AVE #3050 304 S YELLOWSTONE CATONSVILLE, MD 21228 CHICAGO, IL 606115515 MONTANA, MT 59047 SAVITT STEVEN KUMAGAI GLORIA DIBRELL CHARLES G JR & FRANCES 332 WESTWOOD DR N 332 WESTWOOD DR 24 ADLER CIR GOLDEN VALLEY, MN 55422 GOLDEN VALLEY, MN 55422 GALVESTON, TX 77551-5828 ASPEN KOEPPEL LLC BECKER EQUITIES LLC DIRKES PETER R 2627 S BAYSHORE DRIVE # 806 8090 S DURANGO DR#115 324 FOXWOOD LN ' MIAMI, FL 33133 LAS VEGAS, NV 89113 MILL NECK, NY 11765 AJAX MTN INVESTMENTS LLC WEAST FAMILY TRUST TERMINELLO DENNIS J & KERRY L 1101 30TH ST NW #150 614 CALLE MONTERA 656 RIDGEWAY WASHINGTON, DC 20007 ESCONDIDO, CA 920257957 WHITE PLAINS, NY 10605-4323 213 ASPEN SQUARE LLC BARBATA LAURA ANDERSON 1/3 BARBATA ELENA ANDERSON 1/3 533 E HOPKINS AVE 1600 TEXAS ST #1504 2040 FRANKLIN ST #507 ASPEN, CO 81611 FORT WORTH, TX 76102 SAN FRANSISCO, CA 94109 RBATA KATHLEEN ANDERSON 1/3 ASHTON SQUARE LLC GILBERT GARY 40 FRANKLIN ST #507 9204 EMMOTT RD 1556 ROYAL BLVD SAN FRANSISCO, CA 94109 HOUSTON, TX 77040 GLENDALE, CA 91207 HEMP SUZANNE LIV TRUST FLY MARIE N NEWHOUSE IRREV RE TRUST 470 POMONA RD 10170 WEST HUTTON DR 5640 CHRISTMAS LAKE RD wROOKFIELD, Wl 53005 SUN CITY, AZ 85351 EXCELSIOR, MN 55331 S & S REALTY PARTNERS LLC GOLDEN PANTHERS LLC GRINSPOON STEVEN REV TRUST 230 PARK AVE 32ND FL 78365 HWY 111 #415 10 BALDWIN CR NEWYORK, NY 10169 LA QUINTA, CA 92253 WESTON, MA 02493 FREITAS MICAH J JONA HOLDINGS INC PARADISE TRADING PTY LTD TRUSTEE PO BOX 10915 TORONTO DOMINION CENTRE TD BANK TOY PO BOX 7795 GOLD COAST MAIL CENTER ASPEN, CO 81612 66 WELLINGTON ST W#4400 PO BOX 163 BUNDALL QLO 4217 AUSTRALIA TORONTO ONTARIO M5K 1H6, , WELLS RICHARD AARON WEST ULLA CHRISTINA GRINSPOON JEFFREY REV TRUST PO BOX 4867 3042 TOLKIEN LN 2724 N LINCOLN AVE ASPEN, CO 81612 LAKE OSWEGO, OR 97034 CHICAGO, IL 60614 ASPEN SQUARE 305 LLC NEUMAYER CHARLES & DEBORAH MAYFAIR INVESTMENTS LLC 6018 BLOSSOM ST 900 BRIDLEGATE LN PO BOX 268 HOUSTON, TX 77007 NORTHFIELD, IL 60093 RICHMOND VICTORIA 3121 AUSTRALIA, SABLE LTD W PROPERTIES 11 LLC GUILBEAU CAPITAL HOLDINGS LLC PO BOX 11005 4600 MARRIOTT DR, STE 400 151 CHERAMIE LN ASPEN, CO 81612 RALEIGH, NC 27612 GOLDEN MEADOW, LA 70357 SODERLING RONALD E TRUSTEE GEOLFA GROUP LLC N S N ASSOCIATES INC 901 DOVE ST STE 270 PO BOX 3131 11051 WADDISON ST NEWPORT BEACH, CA 92660-3038 CINNAMINSON, NJ 08077 FRANKLIN PARK, IL 60131 NORDANJOSH VARADY LOTHAR & CHERYL TRUST BENNETT MARGARET A REV TRUST 433 PLAZA REAL #275 5036 MAUNALANI CIR 55 BAYBROOK LN BOCA RATON, FL 33432-3999 HONOLULU, HI 96816 OAK BROOK, IL 60523 RIEDEL JOYCE L TRUST HIRSH RICHARD G & CLAIRE R RUDD WAYNE PO BOX 3006 NASATIR MICHAEL & DELIGHT 132 PARK AVE EDWARDS, CO 81632-3006 2115 MAIN STREET BASALT, CO 81621 SANTA MONICA, CA 90405 EN DONNE & ELIZABETH FAM TRUST PLATINUM GLOBAL VENTURES LLC GLUCK SANFORD & CAROLE E ASP TRST CABALLEROS RD PO BOX 2896 176 E 71 ST ST ROLLING HILLS, CA 90274 CHAPEL HILL, NC 27515 NEW YORK, NY 10021 WILSON LINDA J & DAVID P KOEPPEL KEVIN F MJM HOLDINGS 11 LLC i BOX 1343 2627 S BAYSHORE DRIVE # 806 1701 GOLF RD WARDS, CO 81632 MIAMI, FL 33133 TOWER 3 STE 203 ROLLING MEADOWS, IL 60008 CRICK NATHALIE J WELLS RICHARD A & SUSAN T TRUST PORTE BROOKE 835 E DURANT AVE #2 100 N TRYON ST 47TH FLR 3520 PADDOCK RD ASPEN, CO 81611 CHARLOTTE, NC 28202 WESTON, FL 33331 ABRAMSON LAWRENCE M BJHW IRREVOCABLE TRUST MORGAN LORI 2315 ESPANA REAL 425 1ST ST #3705 25 IRENE CT WEST PALM BEACH, FL 33415 SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94105 BROOMFIELD, CO 800201142 KUTINSKY BRIAN NEUMANN MICHAEL JEFFRIES FRANK W 111& JANET ODLE 26480 NORMANDY RD 7381 MOHASNIC DR 500 HUNTINGTON DR FRANKLIN, MI 480251034 BLOOMFIELD HILLS, MI 48301 ANN ARBOR, MI 48104 SEGUIN JEFF W & MADALYN B TRUST V M W TRUST OF 1991 KOVACH MARY SUSAN 617 E COOPER #412 301 N LAKE AVE STE 900 1422 N LASALLE DR #101 ASPEN, CO 81611 PASADENA, CA 91101 CHICAGO, IL 606106416 MARELL SARAJANE ABRAMSON MAUTNER RICHARD & MARIANNE RONYRA REALTY NV 2315 ESPANA REAL 2660 PEACHTREE RD NWAPT 25A/B 4425 BAYARD ST # 200 WEST PALM BEACH, FL 33415 ATLANTA, GA 30305 SAN DIEGO, CA 92109 POWDER 210 LLC BELSKY PETER NAM REAL ESTATE LLC 400 E MAIN ST #2 9204 EMMOTT RD 1230 PEACHTREE ST NE #3100 ASPEN, CO 81611 HOUSTON, TX 77040-3328 ATLANTA, GA 30309 DAVIS FAMILY TRUST OTTO GERDAU CO EATON HUGH M 11[ PO BOX 1909 700 S UTE AVE 700 S UTE AVE RANCHO SANTA FE, CA 92067 ASPEN, CO 81611 ASPEN, CO 81611 i RAHLEK LTD AT BANK OF AMERICA WELSCH SUSAN FLEET TRUST RUKAVINA MAE C TRUST 3903 BELLAIRE BLVD 101 N SPRING ST #201 5640 KIPLING AVE HOUSTON, TX 77025 ASPEN, CO 81611 MINNETONKA, MN 55345 -'PEN SQUARE HOLDINGS LLC CMMM INVESTMENTS LLC MELTZER-BRENNAN PARTNERSHIP 16 TIMBERLAND DR 4937 HEARST ST #B 700 UTE AVE MARIETTA, GA 30067 METAIRIE, LA 70001 ASPEN, CO 81611 MASON JOSEPH & JENNIFER RUICCI JOSEPH ANGELO RHODES MARJORIE S LLC 1 DOGWOOD LN 21298 LAUREN LN 1401 AVOCADO AVE STE #901 â€žERWYN, PA 19312 FARMINGTON HILLS, MI 48335 NEWPORT BEACH, CA 92660 SILVERSTEIN SAMUEL C & JO ANN RING BARRY S CARMAN PETER 110 RIVERSIDE DR 9B 552 W OAKDALE AVE 700 UTE AVE #808 NEW YORK, NY 10024 CHICAGO, IL 60657 ASPEN, CO 81611 PARLETTE R BRUCE 50% INT BURGESS JOHN K & ELIZABETH CARAS STACY LIV TRUST PARLETTE RICHARD S 50% 700 UTE AVE #202 PO BOX 266 , 825 DEAN ST ASPEN , CO 81611 PALOS VERDES PENINSULA, CA 90274 ASPEN, CO 81611 WEIGAND BROTHERS LLC BARROW MICHAEL E TRST ASPEN INVESTMENTS LLC 150 N MARKET 708 E 12TH PO BOX 3657 ' WICHITA, KS 67202 NORTH LITTLE ROCK, AR 72119 ASPEN, CO 81612 ESPOSITO VINCENT A & JANET M TRUSTEE: S&S 115 LLC SKEGBY HOLDINGS LTD 6276 VIA CANADA 700 UTE AVE #115 533 E HOPKINS AVE RANCHO PALOS VERDES, CA 90275 ASPEN, CO 81611 ASPEN, CO 81611 THOMSON FAMILY LP LEBOVITS & MOSES CARMAN PETER PO BOX 5100 10318 GLENBARR AVE 700 S UTE AVE #808 NEWPORT BCH, CA 92662 LOS ANGELES, CA 90064 ASPEN, CO 81611 LANDMARK AMERICA INC CUB CLUB LLC PARIMAR LTD OF CAPLP CONSULTANTS 700 S UTE AVE 1212 AVENUE OF THE AMERICAS FLAT 201 VICTORIA HOUSE , ASPEN, CO 81611 NEW YORK, NY 10036 15 MANOU KATRAKI ST KITI LARNACA 7550 CYPRUS, GLORY HOLE CONDOMINIUM ASSOC DILLON ROB ERT JAY 111 TRU ST HURWIN DUFFY & RON REV TRUST 730 E DURANT AVE 649 LOCUST ST 558 TENAYA DR ASPEN, CO 81611 WINNETKA, IL 60093 TIBURON, CA 94920 J&L ASPEN LLC THOMPSON LINDA TRUST MENEFEE SAMUEL P 19330 CARRIGER RD 7140 S RIVIERA ST PO BOX 5291 SONOMA, CA 95476 AURORA, CO 80016 CHARLOTTESVILLE, VA 22905 H FAMILY 2 LLC SUMMERS AARON MARK WALLING REBECCA 6 PFISTER DR PO BOX 2946 350 BLANCA AVE ASPEN, CO 81611 ASPEN, CO 81612 TAMPA, FL 33606 DK LLC HELLER STEVEN B VGA ALPS LLC SAN MARCO CT 3668 NW COTTON PL 6625 ZUMIREZ DR rALM COAST, FL 32137 BEND, OR 97701 MALIBU, CA 90265 LETTS W JACKSON & JOYCE H ANDERSON ROBERT M & LOUISE E SANDIFER C W JR TRUST ' 2700 W 63RD ST 1021 23RD ST 240 LINDEN DR MISSION HILLS, KS 66208 CHETEK, WI 54728 BOULDER, CO 80304 SANDIFER DICKSIE L TRUST COUCH CATHERINE ANNE CORDUROY CRUISERS LLC 240 LINDEN DR PO BOX 7744 710 E DURANT AVE BOULDER, CO 80304 ASPEN, CO 81612 ASPEN, CO 81611 KARICK LLC ASPEN SQUARE VENTURES LLP K L 77 CO INVESTMENTS LP 730 E DURANT AVE 602 E COOPER #202 3903 BELLAIRE BLVD ASPEN, CO 81611 ASPEN, CO 81611 HOUSTON, TX 77025 STUDIO FIVE LLC NAGEY DAVID A & ELAINE TRAICOFF NAGEY TIBOR F PO BOX 1863 3 BEACH DR 3 BEACH DR ASPEN, CO 81612 SHERWOOD FOREST, MD 21405 SHERWOOD FOREST, MD 21405-9999 LANDL FAMILY TRUST CHANG CC& ILING S WRIGHT TRUST 6 W RIDGE AVE 44E ESTORIL COURT 1412 ANTIQUA WAY PROSPECT HEIGHTS, IL 60070 55 GARDEN ROAD NEWPORT BEACH, CA 92660-4914 HONG KONG, FOXS LEGACY LLC NELSON FAMILY LIVING TRUST ONE THIRTEEN LLC 400 E MAIN ST 295 BARRINGTON LN 3330 SW 58TH ST ASPEN, CO 81611 ALAMO, CA 945071749 FORT LAUDERDALE, FL 33312 APPENDIX B 4 B Legal Tabs Co. 1-800-322-3022 Recycled ~ Stock # DOA-5-S 1 Legal Tabs Co. 1-800-322-3022 Â© Stock#DO-10-S r-EXHIBIT Wa~Eâ‚¬*62 k.. aspen 234 e hopkins ave, aspen co- denver 1830 blake st, ste 200, denver co 80202 + t 303 308 13 visit www.rowlandbroughton.corn rowland+broughton architecture / urban design / interior design MEMORANDUM Project: 21406 - Sky Hotel Subject: Revisions since Ordinance 39 Date: 14 July 2015 Revisions Ordinance 39 docs and new docs: The below is a summary of various revisions to the Detailed Review documents as we have progressed through approximately 50% of the Design Development Phase per Architectural phases of documentation. Arch Drawings: - AO.5, Proposed Floor Area calculation revisions as shown. The building was detailed more and through coordination with consultants there were some minor shifts in layouts as shown - PD1.3b, revised Public Amenity square footage numbers per building/site design revisions, was 3,113 sf, now 3,430 sf. The addition is due to site/landscape revisions adding more Public Amenity Space. - PD1.3(,revised Public Amenity square footage numbers per building design revisions, was 1,553 sf, now 1,362 sf. The reduction was due to coordination of the setback "notch" that was missed previously. - PD1.3d revised Public Amenity square footage numbers on roof top per building design revisions/coordination with structure & roofs, was 7,132 sf, now 6,575 sf. Total Public Amenity revised was 11,798 sf, now 11,367 sf. The lot area used was revised, from 38,913 sf to 24,001 sf as we should have taken out the area of vacated Right of Ways from the total lot area. - PD2-0, minor revisions interior, no exterior revisions (new intake vent chase shown) - PD2-1 Main entry exterior ramp moved to interior due to sidewalk width requirements. Stair 1 and stair 2 exterior halls now interior space per code/function Minor exterior wall revisions due to veneer thickness and setback rules Entry airlock added updated Civil and Landscape site information on backgrounds - PD2-2 o revision to exterior lounge area deck: reduced size, 5' setback created a setback "notch" that was nor coordinated properly. o Minor wall revisions due to coordination and setback - PD2-3, minor wall revisions due to coordination and setbacks - PD2-4, added more green roof/planters on outdoor private deck - PD2-5 o Added more green rooUplanters o Slight layout revisions per structural roof coordination o North wing, east dormer of Lodge/Fract Unit 3 revised from gable to shed dormer (see elevation) Page 1 of 2 00000 rowland+broughton architecture / urban design / interior design o Added rigid exterior roof insulation per 2015 IBC, details and assembly build up revised, revised height calculations per coordination. All in compliance. - PD4-1 o West Elevation- some window revisions per coordination. Added more storefront windows and fenestration design details. o North Elevation-more roof deck detail/guardrails shown o More detailed deck articulation. - PD4-2 o South Elevation - some minor gable roof/dormer revisions due to structural coordination, revised from 4:12 to 3:12 as shown. Added East wing 3rd level deck upper spa mech room east end, mirrors the alley north side stair tower. o East Elevation - Upper unit north wing dormer revised from gable to shed roof, some window & door revisions per coordination. - PD6-1 o Renderings updated per all revisions. Mudflow Report responses: - Walls will be reinforced to withstand the dynamic and static mud pressure of the mudflows that may occur around the building. - Windows will have impact resistant glass and rated to accommodate the dynamic and static mud pressures. Page 2 of 2 2 Legal Tabs Co. 1-800-322-3022 Recycled ~ Stock # DO-10-S DRAFT SKY HOTEL SUBDIVISION / PD PLAN SET ~ rE rowland+broughton PROJECT IMAGES PROJECT DIRECTORY archRecture/urban deign/tntenor design 234 e hop/ns ave 1830 blake st ste. 200 AV(EXTERIOR)Â· XSSENTIALS aspen,co 81611 denvef.co 80202 OV,NER REP JOHN SARPA DEVELOPMENT CIVIL ENGINEER. SOPRIS ENGINEERING 970 544 9006 0 303 3081373 0 300 SOUTH SPRING ST, SUITE 200 502 MAIN ST, SUITE A-3 109 AABC 970 544 3473 f 303 308 1375 f ASPEN. CO 81611 CARBONDALE. CO 81623 ASPEN, CO 81611 PHONE' 202625 7890 PHONE 970.704 0311 PHONE 970 9251700 CONTACT: CONTACTS CONTACT JOHN SARPA MARK BECKLER DAMON ROTH john@phnsarpa corn mbeckler@sopriseng corn 970948 B985 c:eli 970 379.2595 JESSE SWANN, PE damon roth@xssentials com j..mn'@soplise. com SKY HOTELÂ· THE SKY HOTEL ACOUSTIC/SOUNDÂ· D L. ADAMS 709 E DURANT AVE SURVEYOR SOPRIS ENGINEERING 1536 OGDEN ST ASPEN. CO 81611 502 MAIN ST , SUITE A-3 DENVER, CO 80218 PHONE 9709256760 CARBONDALE, CO 81623 PHONE: 3034551900 Consultants. v.wa.skyhotel com PHONE: 970 704 0311 CONTACT CONTACT CONTACTS DAVID MANLEY COREY ENLOE (GENERAL MANAGER) MARK BECKLER dmanley@dlaa com corey enloe @theskyhotelcom mbeclder@sopnseng com MICK BARNHARDT JESSE SWANN, PE mbamha rdt@claa com jswann@sopriseng com ARCHITECT: ROVAAND+BROUGHTON ARCHITECTURE AND URBAN DESIGN GEOTECHNICAL CTLTHOMPSON WATERPROOFING BCIE 234 E HOPKINS STREET ENGINEER 234 CENTER DRIVE 1520 WEST CANAL COURT, ST 240 ASPEN,CO 81611 GLENWOOD SPRINGS. CO 81601 LITTLETON, CO 80120 PHONE, 970 5449006 PHONE, 970 945 2809 PHONE, 303 350.1000 FAX 970 544 3473 FAX: 970 945.7411 CONTACT CONTACTS LINDA MCGOWAN, PE, AIA SCOTT MCHALE linda@building-c-e.com scott@rowlandbro ughton com LANDSCAPE BLUE GREEN,LLC CHRIS DUNBAR, PE direct 970 429 8712 ARCHITECTÂ· 300 S SPRING STREET, SUITE 202 DELVON NEMECHEK ASPEN, CO 81611 delvon@/dandbroughton com PHONE 970 429.7499 POOL CONSULT. WATER DESIGN, INC. CONTACTS. 5047 S GALENA DRIVE direct 970 429 8711 NICK MASSMANN VALERIEALEXANDER MURRAY, UT 84123 nick massmann@rowlandbroughton. com valerie@bluegreenaspen com PHONE: 801.261.4009 Plot DateÂ· 7/13/2015 5 0512 PM direct 970 429 8709 SHERISANZONE CONTACT sheri@bluegreenaspen com JIM REDMAN COMMUNICATIONS FORTE INTERNATIONAL CHRISTINE SHINE 07.14.2015 DETAILED PO BOX 8610 chri/tine@bluegreenaspencom CODE CONSULTÂ· COLORADO CODE CONSULTING, LLC ASPEN, CO 81612 KATIE TABOR 4610 S. WRITER, STE 150 REVIEW -fortein~ma~onal net DENVER, CO 80237 APPLICATION btie@blegreenaspen corn CONTACT PHONE. 303 693 0630 STRUCTURAL KL&A CONTACT RJ GALLAGHER ENGINEER 1717 WASHINGTON AVE, ST 100 STEVE THOMAS 970379 0150 GOLDEN, CO 80401 .@forteintern.8onal.net PHONEÂ· 303 384.9910 - /SOILS PO BOX 1659 MUDFLOW TETRATECH CONTACT: PRECONSTRUCTION HASELDEN CONSTRUCTION BRANT LAHNERT CONSULTANTÂ· 130 SK] HILL RD, SUITE 140 CONTRACTOR 6950 S. POTOMAC ST blahnert@kiaa com BRECKINRIDGE. CO 80424 CENTENNIAL, CO 80112 PHONEÂ· 720-864-4589 PHONE 303728 3717 MEP/LIGHTINGÂ· BEAUDIN GANZE CONSULTING CONTACTS ENGINEERS CONTACT PEGGY BAILEY BYRON HASELDEN 22 CHAPEL PLACE. UNIT AC-201 byronhaselden@haselden com AVON. CO 81620 cell 303 880.3147 PHONE 970.949 6108 VIEW FROM DUFU\NT AVE. GREG CONGER CONTACTSÂ· gregconger@haselden.com DAN KOELIKER. PE GARY MANCHESTER djkoeliker@bgde com gilmanchester@haselden com MARK SACCONI, PE (PM) ROB SNELLING masacconi@bgde com robinelling@haselden com ERIN L PASOLD, PE (MECHANICAL) elpasold@bgde com PLANNER. VANN ASSOCIATES PLANNING CONSULTANTS TIA NORD, LC PO BOX 4827 ERIC RUBOTTOM. PE (LIGHTING) BASALT, CO 81621 elrubottor@bgde com -Â·-- - -Â· - PHONE 970 925 6958 CONTACT SUNNYVANN vannassogates@corcast ret SHEETINDEX P[)01 COVER SHEET, DRAWING LIST AND PROJECT DIRECTORY PDZO.4.1 SURVEY SHEET 1 PDZ042 SURVEY SHEET 2 PDZO.43 SURVEY SHEET 3 Cl CONCEPTUAL SITE IMPROVEMENTS PLAN C2 CONCEPTUAL GRADING & DRAINAGE PLAN C3 CONCEPTUAL WATER QUALITY PLAN 04 DRAINAGE PLAN C5 CONCEPTUAL UTiLITY PLAN SKY HOTEL L001 NOTES L002 NOTES L100 TREE MITIGATION PLAN L 200 STREET LEVEL LAYOUT PLAN L200B STREET LEVEL LAYOUT PLAN - OPTIONS , L300 STREET LEVEL MATERIALS PLAN 709 E. DURANT AVE. L300B STREET LEVEL MATERIALS PLAN - OPTION B ASPEN, CO 81611 L400 PLANTING LEGEND L401 STREET LEVEL PLANTING PLAN L401B STREET LEVEL PLANTING PLAN - OPTION B - ROOF LEVEL PLANTJNG PLAN 1 1 P[)0.5 PROPOSED FLOOR AREA CALCULATIONS - PDO 'b PROPOSED FLOOR AREA CALCULATIONS - OPTION B PDO.58 EXISTING FLOOR AREA CALCULATIONS - P01 1 PROPOSED SITE PLAN PD12 PD1.1b PROPOSED SITE PLAN - OPTION B SITE ACCESSILBILITY PLAN PD1 3a EXISTING PUBLIC AMENITY SPACE PLAN P01.3b PROPOSED PUBLIC AMENITY SPACE PLAN PD1 3c PROPOSED PUBLIC AMENITY SPACE PLAN PD1 3d PROPOSED PUBLIC AMENITY SPACE PLAN PD1 4 SNOWSTORAGE & SNOW SHEDDING PLAN VIEW FROM UTE AVE. PD2 0 BASEMENT Ll FLOOR PLAN PD1 5 SNOW STORAGE & SNOW SHEDDING PLAN PDZ. Ob BASEMENT Ll FLOOR PLAN - OPTION B PROJECT NO P[}2.1 LEVEL 1 FLOOR PLAN 21406.60 PD2.lb LEVEL 1 FLOOR PLAN - OPTION B PD22 LEVEL 2 FLOOR PLAN /02.3 LEVEL 3 FLOOR PLAN PD24 LEVEL 4 FLOOR PLAN SHEET TITLE: PD2.5 ROOF PLAN P65.2 SITE LIGHTING PLAN COVER SHEET, PD3.4c PRIVATE LOUNGE LIGHTING PLAN PD3.5a POOL LOUNGE UGHTING PLAN DRAWING LIST AND PD3.5b BAR & LOUNGE DECK LIGHTING PLAN PD4.1 PROPOSED EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS PROJECT DIRECTORY PD42 PROPOSED EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS SCALE 12" = 1'-0 PD43 PROPOSED SKY HOTEL MATERIALS PD51 PROPOSED BUILDING SECT]ONS PD5 2 PROPOSED BUILDING SECTIONS PÂ®1 RENDERINGVIEWS PDO.1 PD6 2 RENDERING VIEWS PD63 RENDERINGVIEWS )rT -1.-> - e=UnMTONA~=~â„¢:Tv~ AND vUA~ OES1=~1 Pazo.50 PD PLATT SHEET 1 W.m.1*0 -sÂ»,3Â·940UGâ€¢{CÂ»,Am,~r~El-v*E.â€žOUR:fw.[EW W PDZO.5.1 PD PLATT SHEET 2 - )-Ill=.5.-.0./RESEN?vE.%Â£r...,1.* C L.â€žfil~.ri,e-#eg 61,~.ge,T0AL.,00*,1,01 IMPROVEMENT SURVEY PLAT WITH TOPOGRAPHY OF: WOODSTONE INN CONDOMINIUMS A PARCEL OF LAND SITUATED IN THE NWh OF SECTION 18 TOWNSHIP 10 SOUTH, RANGE 84 WEST OF THE 6th P.M. hÂ·A Â· Â·*d 8,1.1 CITY OF ASPEN, COUNTY OF PITKIN, STATE OF COLORADO SHEET 1 OF 3 VICINITY MAP, CONTROLLING MONUMENTATION, PROPERTY DESCRIPTION, NOTES AND CERTIFICATES PROPERTY DESCRIPTION 4 9- < (FROM TITLE COMMITMENT PREPARED BY PITKIN COUNTYTITLE, INC. UNDERCASE 4AL '/ 4...):9/4~Irit.45<41_ . NO. PCT23970W3, DATED JUNE 9,2015) , 10 l-~m' A.'Liajlpit'EliNT##44 t ~ . Â·-Ii -nt; -:i fÂ·<,f23i~ -.~Â«3-:{:3 fik f: fl j~~.~:}Â·*.~;i ~ - Â·i~Â·i~i ~ -rl I'~'*....j~~Â·'i ~i PARCELI WOODSTONE INN CON DO MINIUMS, ACCORDING TO THE CONDOMINIUM MAP : ' 1* b- THEREOF FILED MARCH 11, 1983 IN PLAT BOOK 14 AT PAGE 45 THROUGH 49 INCLUSIVE, AT RECEPTION NO. 248609 AND ASFURTHERDEFINED AND DESCRIBEDIN 1 THECONDOMINIUMDECLARATION FORWOODSTONE INN CONDOMINIUMS RECORDED MARCH 11,1983 IN BOOK 441 AT PAGE 814 AT RECEPTION NO, 248608. *vill~~illlll~ l , -/"'.../I&L â€¢1..sall./1114*le --0 -1 <,El - - . f 4.4 4 .r PARCEL 11 A NON-EXCLUSIVE EASEMENT AND RIGHT-OF-WAY FORTHE PURPOSEOF INGRESS ANDEGRESS OVERANDACROSSTHATCERTAIN PARCELDESCRIBEDINLONG FORM lip'| ~;~ ~ "' it** | EASEMENTAGREEMENT UNRECORDED, NOTICEOF WHICH IS GIVEN BY SHORT FORM 1 < EASEMENT AGREEMENT RECORDED APR!1 25, 1977 IN BOOK 327 AT PAGE 777. 1.h ....f, 1 J Â»1 1 I PARCEL 111 ~ ~L~y144*oL-2~* 1/6* .9.-4.HA*#44 -' 9 4 1 -4/trt/~" --I:~ 4. r ENCROACHMENT LICENSE AGREEMENTS FORTHE PURPOSES STATED THEREIN Â· m~ 2009 MARNI CONROLSURVEY Â£~ , '...,A r'pb **IDALL 2 i - . -' -7~ A RECORDED SEPTEMBER 3, 1976 IN BOOK 316 BAT PAGE 232, APRIL 30, 1982 IN BOOK Â»*Â¥ L 425 AT PAGE 907, IN BOOK 425 AT PAGE 913, IN B00K 425 AT PAGE 919, AND 4 1 k. i 01*+LOT@ ~ I ' 'i i ...:jÂ·:-.;Â·Â·Â·I.\ 1 i,-7. 71Â·.k. . rial#44. RECORDED NOVEMBER 13, 1985 IN BOOK 498 AT PAGE 909. 04..,021. *-Â·\ 1 I--- *-- Â¥'3. : a f r mt 106 DUGS - F PLAT 81(Â· 1,P 1~/Fi'.1 UT'll I - I E- A .....:95 / 1 Wolf CONDOM.085 REI #134986 . r<h. r SCALE: 1"=2000 VICINITY MAP .*W . .//hid~ , -7 7. I ... 2. 4 . E -AWMiAR#ND i J k-~*~.J' 9--f' 4 7 IR SHEET INDEX - . 11'ru., /12 Lurt- j .i:11 6 LOrl ~~/0/./ - r.,â€¢ i t t.a)- SURVEY NOTES SHEETI , VICINITY MAP, CONTROLLING MONUMENTATION, 19 sm.MENDED,~cr . . â„¢ ~7-- : :, 9 '44 -I.,4.Â§= I , 1) DATEOF SURVEY: MARCH - MAY 2014; UPDATE PERCITY REQUIREMENTS JULY 2015 f T- PROPERTY DESCRIPTIONS, NOTES AND I- L.mU NELL SUBDIV,51(I PROJECTBENCHARK J CHATEAU DUM.60* ' - -Â«.c - * CERTIFICATES -4,16 - .- ,:4 / UN-pÂ·K. N:~:/9,50 & 4 REI #133329 p Â·- ~ ~-k 1 *EG.Clom GPS.1 s. WE5!ENDSTREET Allit DURANUVE. 2) DATE OF PREPARATION: APRIL- MAY 2014; UPDATED JULY 2015 SHEETZ . EXTERIOR BOUNDARY ANDTITLE EXCEPTIONS ~ ~A â€¢ â€¢ : -9-*=.*.-/pa V. LJ :Â· 7~10.72' 1 '34 .1 , ---7--1 -- ~ . e= . , FOUND P.IC NAIL 3) BASIS OF BEARING: A BEARINGOF S 74Â°14'07'Â·E BETWEEN CITY OF ASPEN GPS CONTROL MONUMENTS GPS-2 l.. SHEET 3 . .. EXISTING CONDITIONS AND TOPOGRAPHY . I PEA 2009 MAION C[,mol.Suml~ Â¢r,* j PR~NG ~ ~ LL . ~ATEAU CI~UMONT LODGE ANDSHINEE -* AND GPS-1, BOTH BRAS5 CAPS SET IN MONUMENT BOXES ATTHE APPROXIMATE INTERSECTIONS OF S.SALENA ST ROW NitieWS- 4 ANDE. DURANTAVE. AND S. WEST END ST. ANDE. DURANT AVE., RESPECTIVELY. THIS BASIS OF BEARING IS 4.- ~ 1-- ~ 0-1...&~ .'~ ' Â·.*~ i Â·- 4~ - , 2 i CONSISTENTWITHTHEMODIFIEDSTATEPLANECOORDINATESYSTEMACCORDINGTOTHEGPSCONTROL REC. *133420 6 i /-Mb.W 4,0, UNO P.K-NAIL , .5 -2 . 4,< SHINER 1 1 B. 1 Â· BEARS~77-lh' - ' '4 ' 44.1.NAILAND *4 *' -040 *t eNDSI'INER L 1 .1.98 DESCRIPTIONS FOR ALL PROPE RTIES SHOWN HEREON HAVE BEEN ROTATED TO BECONSISTENTWITH THIS BASIS OF /Â¥- 6 , 4. N 94 MONUMENTATION MAP PREPARED BY MARGIN ENGINEERING, DATED DECEMBER 12, 2009 (REV. 2010). THE h ' A - Itil + 1 BEARING Â£ i '6Â· 1~, ILLE lati,-2, h . :' I # 2 2 1 6 2 1*-â€¢UL ' FOUND .S REBARAND -' 41* 177=18'E :+901,0* ~1~ Â· Â· f,2,0. %9~?Tt~*~7Wiu-Gs R . "7* IREEr 21#L k -7 9 4) BASIS OF SURVEY: THE OFFICIAL MAP OF THECITY OF ASPEN, PREPARED BY G.E. BUCHANAN, DATED 1959; VARIOUS MAPS OF UTE ADDITION; THE MAPOF THE SOUTH ANNEXATION TO THE CITY OFASPEN; THE MAPOF 2 .b ASPEN ALPS; THE CONDOMINIUM MAPOF ASPEN ALPS WEST; THE GPS CONTROLMONUMENTATION MAP w 9.--__ 2- FOLK NNLAND SHINER . FOUND #5 REBARAND PREPARED BY MARCIN ENGINEERING, DATED DECEMBER 12, 2009 (REV. 2010); THE ALTAJACSM LAND TITLE SURVEY Li,2031 2- 1-url OF WOODSTONE INN CONDOMINIUMS PREPARED BY ASPEN SURVEY ENGINEERS DATED FEBRUARY 25,2004; THE . -- -LS *28643 . _ 1.25Â» PLASnCCAP 1 EME. e r FOUNDE.'AKE J.' 2 = FOINg P.K NAJL " --- L.S./6129 -4 CONDOMINIUM MAP FOR THE WOODSTONE INN CONDOMINIUMS (REC. #248609); THE FIRST AMENDED PLAT OF ~ V.*. ~~~~Fl ~ * r# 8 :.:SliÂ§NEi~1-s. ~~* . LITTLE NELLSUBDIVISION: THECONDOMINIUMMAPOFTHE DURANTMALL; THEPLATOFCHATEAU DUMONT 1//79. 4 LODGE; THE CONDOMINIUM MAP OF ASPEN SQUARE; THE PLAT OF CHATEAU CHAUMONT LODGE; THE MAP OF GLORY HOLE CONDOMINIUMS; VARIOUS DOCUMENTS OF RECORD, AND THE FOUND MONUMENTS. AS SHOWN. 5) BASIS OF ELEVATION: AN ELEVATION OF 7911.98' (NAVD 1988) ON THE NGS STATION -Cl-159", PERTHE 2009 CITY FOUNDIREBARANP-5.4,5*NVALLEY_ 0. OF ASPEN GPS CONTROL SURVEY, THIS ESTABLISHED THE LOCALS[TE BENCHMARKOF 7940.72' ON THE#5 REBAR ...... LANDIRUSY Ll'20351 M. 282'9935 , ..#'PA E; 3:'1**** 2 #-1 #ty' y" 41' AND 1.25" PLASTICCAP, STAMPED L.S.#16129, MONUMENTING AN ANLE POINT IN THE EASTERLY BOUNDARY UNE, . t.- -#l, 1 i 3 0 1,1 AS SHOWN HEREON. - * ~ 6) THIS SURVEY DOES NOT CONSTITUTE ATITLE SEARCH BY SOPRIS ENGINEERING, LLC (SE)TO DETERMINE Lim]51 ~ aPEN ALPS (BEND , I .1 '1 1/ It OWNERSHIP OR EASEMENTS OF RECORD. FOR ALL INFORMATJON REGARDING EASEMENTS, RIGHTS OF WAY - y p ' Â· FooND As l- '.4- J - - -%,4.6 / 4 r AND/OR TITLE OF RECORD, SE RELIED UPON THEi TITLE COMMITMENT PREPARED BY PITKIN COUNTY TITLE, INC., Fl,a,~~. . 114** LC ILLEGIBLE + .,4 /../PLAT.1/2/Po.304-308 FOUND #5 REBAR AND T .: A l.I FIAST1' CAP U 1%,91 - 1,Â· 10 3 - ~ ~ UNDER CASINO. PCT23970W3, DATED JUNE 9,2015, AND THE ABOVE SAID PLATS AND MAPS DESCRIBED IN NOTE 4. S# h ' * 'A: Â£ , L 5 116129 ' â€¢ 7) THE LOCATIONS OF UNDERGROUND UTILITIES HAVE BEEN PLOTTED BASED ON UTILITY MAPS, IS THE RESPONSIBILITY OF THE CONTRACTOR TO CONTACT ALL UTILITY COMPANIES FOR FIELD LOCATION OF - RUNg#'8Alt ANO CONSTRUCTION/DESIGN PLANS, OTHER INFORMATION PROVIDED BY UTILITY COMPANIES AND ACTUAL FIELD LOCATIONS IN SOME INSTANCES. THESE UTILITIES, AS SHOWN, MAY NOT REPRESENT ACTUAL FIELD CONDITIONS. IT t * - I.,~ UTILITIES PRIORTO CONSTRUCTION, - Vit;> .1 8) ALL RECORDING INFORMATION REFERENCED HEREIN IS PERTHE PITKIN COUNTY CLERKAND RECORDER'S OFFICE, ..7 0 i , . . Ft UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED. 9 3=' ..,- 4, 9) THELINEAR UNIT USEDIN THEPREPARATIONOF THIS PLAT IS THEU.S. SURVEY FOOT ASDEFINEDBYTHEUNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE, NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF STANDARDS AND TECHNOLOGY, ...r..1 SURVEYOR'S CERTIFICATE 1, MARK S. BE( KLER, HEREBY CERTIFY TO ASPEN CLUB LODGE PROPERTIES, LLC AND PITKIN COUNTY TITLE, INC., THAT THIS IS AN "IMPROVEMENT SURVEY PLAT" AS DEFINED BY C. R.S. Â§38-51-102(9), AND THAT FT #5 A MONUMENTED LAND SURVEY SHOWING THE CURRENT LOCATION OF ALL STRUCTURES. VISIBLE ROADS, TRAILS, UTILITIES, FENCES, ORWALLS SITUATEDON THE DESCRIBEDPARCELAND WITHIN FIVE FEET OF ALL BOUNDARIES OFSUCH PARCEL, ANY CONFLICTING BOUNDARY EVIDENCE ORVISIBLE ENCROACHMENTS, AND ALL EASEMENTS AND RIGHTS OF WAY OF A GRAPHIC SCALE PUBLICOR PRIVATE NATURE THAT ARE VISIBLE, OR APPARENT, OR OF RECORD AND DESCRIBED IN THE PROPERIY INFORMATION BINDERS REFERENCED IN SURVEY NOTE 6 ABOVE, OR OTHER SOURCES AS SPECIFIED ON THE 200 IMPROVEMENT SURVEY PLAT. ERROR OF CLOSURE IS LESS THAN 1/15,000. [ IN FEET ) 1 inch=50 ft. MARKS. BECKLER L.S.#28643 SOPRIS ENGINEERING- LLC CIVILCONSULTANTS 502 MAIN STREET, SUITE A3 +E ACCORDING 70 COLORADO LAW YOU Mve CO&!MEr,ICE,ANy LEGA~ |~ ACTION BASED UPON ANY DEFECT iN THSSURVEY WITHIN THREE YEARS CARBONDALE, COLORADO 81623 AFTER'fou ARST DscovERsucHDEFECT INNOEVEN[ MAYANYACTION ~SED UPON ANY DEFE. IN T.5 SURVEY BE COMMENCED MORE THAN TEN YEARS FROM Tr E DATE OF CERTIFICATION S.JIN HEREON (970) 704-0311 14019.01 CL 07/13/2015 G \2014\laC19\SURVEY DWG56'JRVEY PLOTS\240~9_ISP_PUD DWG IMPROVEMENT SURVEY PLAT WITH TOPOGRAPHY OF: WOODSTONE INN CONDOMINIUMS A PARCEL OF LAND SITUATED IN THE NWh OF SECTION 18 TOWNSHIP 10 SOUTH, RANGE 84 WEST OF THE 6th P.M. CITY OF ASPEN, COUNTY OF PITKIN, STATE OF COLORADO SHEET 2 OF 3 EXTERIOR BOUNDARY AND TITLE EXCEPTIONS ASPEN SQUARE CONDOMINIUMS REC.#133472 / POLLACK RANDALL LLC 1 LOTKâ€¢W~LOTL / 1 BLK 106 ~ FOUND #5 REBAR AND 1.E CAP LS.#20151 GPS-2 4 ---J 5. GALENA STREETAND E. DURANTAVE " - PER 2009 MARC IN CONROL SURVEY DURANT MAU L FOUND P.K. NAIL AND SHINER PLATBK. 425.565 4- - - --i.fi2r 8.52!/6129125 t._ ~ LS. #19598 \ 4- 138101Â· \ 1351.21' Miy S 74Â·1800" E 0% LOT A 'ENCROACHMEN(AGREEMENT LOTE FOUND #5 REBAR AND 1.25~ CAP aR.42/06.90, L.5.Â»20151 1 n T C Â£07Â» ~_ff t RO~ENUE 5 At 116.29' ZopE. LOT' lore ~ - _~* 4- / vii /Â£4 FIRSÂ·TAMENDED MATOF â€¢ 4 .~ p 3 FOUND #5 .M AND 1.25~ CAP LITTLE NEILL SUBDIVISION cu:G , LS.#20151 REC.#510202 5131" ~~& *235 GP5-1 4 L ) 0 - - v PER 2009 MARciN coNRoi suavEY - 44 5.WESTEND'TREETANDE DURANTAVE. P.AL B , â‚¬ 1 ' '447 .r g toi .2 CHATEAU DUMONT LODGE REI #133329 G, m y PROJECT BENCHMARK 4 81 FOUND P.K. NAIL ANC) SHINER LS. 16129 (ASE) (4 i LOTD 3 . u'.V Lora, to,-4, BK,316 PG.232 ;.Q%%~~ 2 88 t. (-17 LS. 019-iÂ«. CHATEAU CHAUMONT LODGE FOUND P.K. WLAND SHINER - . REC #133420 AREA OF ENCROACHMENT 2 N 74 *18'00. ~ inÂ» - CERTIFICATE FOR CANOPY AND <vy. . h. d CP.,7-,9 :.. FLAGPOLES EX,ENDING t,!TO ROW ...L N 30.00' J LOT r: 427.- FOUND P.K. NAIL AND SHINER & F bly C AREAOF ENCROACHMENT -r,4 LS. ILLEGIBLE 1- 02 - AnifflE'[I FOR AWNING EXTENDING 4 -1 : INTO ROW -u, NL f LfÂ»98 PG.gog 4 WOODSTONE INN CONDOMINIUMS 2 0 3 3 AIDMNER .* 8LOCK 1 7 All.Er REC.#248609 Â¥' FOUND /.K. NAIL 42,645 W.I.i & 1-Â·"1959/ 0.979 acrest F~,IMBEARS /77~16+6"W, 2.30' a- ENCROACHMENT AGREEMENT FOR CANOPY EXrENDING INTO ALLEYWAY t.k S 7 *18'00' E 190.001 < t .44 Or) BK.425 PG.913 C /*1 8 F 0 0 4-0 It,1.,~4,1 ~Â©7*~H .#16129 . FOUND NS REBAR AND . Gi Â¢5, i U --FOUND#5 REBAR AND 1.25. CAP PLA5TICCAP LS.#20151 ENCROACHMENT AGREEMENT FOR 940 Av, FOUNDAION AND RETAINING WALLS Â£'- V f .1 0 BK.425 PG.919 : 4 2.7,. FOUND PK NAIL AND SHINER - 001 \ LS.#28843 C Url/ a FOUND REBAR AND CAP FOUND 3 WITNESS CORNER S.#ILLEGIBLE PK NAIL AND SHINER GLORY HOLE CONDOMINIUMS PÂ» Â« t CDT O en T' L S.#28643 LOT F REC#15498G 4.' UTE AVENUE ROW 4. 7.03 515Â·42'00" . 1099.9 fWIDTH VARIES~ --6.42 0 , NAILANDSHINER ' JAc N 74*18'00" W FOUND N5 REBAR 262.78 IBE#11 FOUND #5 REBARAND 1.25~ CAP ASPEN VALLEY LAND TRUST LS.#20151 BK. 282 PG,935 0. .1 / \-CEN,12=1 - - 40 t'*tee EASEMENTAGREEMENT FOR PRIVATE SKEGBY HOLDINGS UMITED FOUND P.X. NAR- AND ~WINER ROADWAY/INGRES/EGRESSGUNTED REC#382365 ~ ~ FOUND #5 REIAM AND 1.25 8YASPEN AIM OWNERS TO HANS B. LSÂ·/6129 CANTRUP (NOW Sly HOTEL) FOUND#5 REBAR AND 1.29- CA FOUNO P.K. NAIL AND SHINER 81827 PG.777 PLASTIC CAP LS.#20151 LS. ILLEGIBLE er\ r PORTION OF UTE tr i AVENUE VACATED I - ORDINANCE NO. 3, SERIES OF 1962 CENTERUNE<*13,83'WIDE -. EASEMENT AGREEMENT FOR PRIVATE 77 0 ASPEN ALPS ROADWAY/INGRESS/EGRIS GRANTED N /0 9Â¥ ASPEN ALP5 OWNERS TO HANS B. (1(OBLD) CANTRUP (NOW SKY HOTEL) ASPEN ALPS WEgr LL PLAT BK. ZA PG. 304-308 PLAT all 3 PG. 26 BK.327 PG.777 t '3Â«N GRAPHICSCALE #**& T /-49*-i 120 FOUND #5 REBAR AND 1.Z5" Pl ASTICCAP 1. ILLEGIBLE (IN FEET) 1 inch =30 ft SOPRIS ENGINEERING - LLC CIVIL CONSULTANTS 502 MAIN STREET, SUITE A3 NOTICE ACCORDING TO COLORADO .W YOU MUST COMMENCE ANY LEGAL ACTION BASEDUPON ANY DEFECT IN THIS SURVEY WITHIN THREE YEARS CARBONDALE, COLORADO 81623 AFTERYOUA;5TDISCOVERSUCHDEFECT iNNOEvENMANYACKON eASEDuPON ANY DEFECT IN THS SUIMÂ¥ BE COMMENCED~RE THA~ TEN YEAR~ FROM THF DAM Of i-FRT,ArATION 5HDWN HEREON (970) 704-0311 1401901 CL 07/13/2015 G \2014\14019\SURVEY DWG5\SUAVEI PUJ'5.14019_!SP_PUDDWC 'ue"Il'. ' 00r M .00.ZÂ¥.St S / 0%% . - - li IMPROVEMENT SURVEY PLAT WITH TOPOGRAPHY OF: WOODSTONE INN CONDOMINIUMS A PARCEL OF LAND SITUATED IN THE NWh OF SECTION 18 I TOWNSHIP 10 SOUTH, RANGE 84 WEST OF THE 6th P.M. CITY OF ASPEN, COUNTY OF PITKIN, STATE OF COLORADO SHEET 3 OF 3 EXISTING CONDITIONS AND TOPOGRAPHY 1 CONâ‚¬RETE SIDEWALK , 9 IL .\4 L---1.-1 FOUND P. K. NAIL ~ i n n 0- LME-.~ ' 1 -_- . ANDSHINER CONCRETE SIDEWALK -E-E-t - ' - EXISTING CONDITIONS LEGEND NIANHOLE 2 1 1 117 7 i - RIM ELEV. = 7936.~9' __-- 2-54 -E E -6 -E -=ILE -2 --- 2 --- 2 -E -72 -~ E -2 .... -t IRR -- 9 - IRR ---_n---rum-,035-='l~ - iMR - 14' ,~0.4 071~/Ilp ~ - 1. *%-2- IRR ~ IRA -- IRR -- IRR ---Ii- IRR - IRA - LRR --~ill iRR #TTI~8 - 24- INV. Dq 5W. 7932.59' e W~ CATV PEDESTAL / 24Â· CMP~Nv. OUTN ~ 7932.52' , i /z m TELEPHONE PEDESTAL / 1936zz ~ RRIGATION MANHOLE1937 m] ELECTRIC METER RIM.ELE,E:67936.29' ---1938 -f-=2.9351~ f# ~ I _---lrCMPINV~ IN E â€¢7931.91' 8 ELECTRICTRANSFORMER 15"CMPINV. OUT W =7931.84' , 8 SEWER CLEANOUT -W-W t:-1.-I _w-- 1 - 2..InÂ»rt-92,-.*F~---~~ - Aft - <5 . I.---Ii.--IN --1-Ii W . - w -4-L_.jw -4.1~ v Â® SEWERMANHOLE r-SEWERMANHOU#08 9 CURB STOP ASPHALT SURFACE ' - 7939 '- - 1"r-W -W W RIMELEV.=7938.58 8" PVC (OR CLAY?, INÂ¥, IN E . 7932.28' DC WATER VALVE --20-19 , 167t S -Â«>40*r~ 5-&5- 5 - S- 5- 5------ 5(~ r PVC (OR ClAY?) iNV, OUT W -7931,47' W, WATER HYDRANT 5- 5 -- 5 - S - 5- S- 5- S- S M GAS METER 0 9\ 11 1/ EWOREELEÂ¥.=7436+30' 1, P .1 \- 5 1-=1--f.I~ 5 -1 Â© ELECTRIC MANHOLE 6=Ast,771 - E r-e#_i---7 . .ALIP,M.#fb*Â«=' - ,, --1-'-I--Ill-li-' - ' ' .L, t . -. -. -, ----*==i-7=lI-LLIZZLIZZLIZLT-EL-7=1-7-2-LI-=LT-22-IZ-21 FOUND #5 REBAGEN| 0 4 x i L. f,40FLZET-321-JUICIZIZE=Ir,22-'--'-'-'-1,-20 1- -- W (TINCRETES,DEWALK Â® WATER MANHOLE i, 1 A--4 -- E 'Ier,2 , 1#629' -k- t- trÂ·11 l - - L 1 0 TELEPHONE MANHOLE CLIMB BOX -0-- i, ~| ~ <dk @ DRYWELL 6' PVC I - St:-17' 41"~ . 4 M, ~Ii 1-2 PLANTER 'iramrr-~--' rÂ·--=--4 E-1 IM ELEV.77*E~ il 1 / \ ~,1.-, SHED r~ m M FLOWLINE EUV,. 7941.60Â· 2 UTILITY MANHOLE 6 PVC JNV. IN SE=7940.13 15"CMPINV. UTE=7934.0/ / r GUY WIRE sro.M HOLE~ cr PLAN R ~ ~ _ 1|L ~ 6~ PIC INÂ¥, 0(I NW = 79419,11 1 1 , 1 - - ./ POWER POLE W R[Milâ‚¬V.=79 70' - ~ SILTED \ ~ | 1 1 19 ell Alll ~~~~ n~â€žWORT~Il ~ ~~~f T 2.-1 LIGHT POLE ~5Â·IMP~IN-Â·79< i SIGN Â»Â· 0*m.INS=7933.00 c - UNDERGROUND CABLE TV 24Â· CMP '4* OUT N = INACCESSIBLk\ r - UNDERGROUNDTELEPHONE 'n - 8 j 1/ 0 --E -E - UNDERGROUND ELECTRIC PlurrER 11 g -5 - SEWER LINE 1 1 'F ;111 ASPHALT SURFAC~\ki u --- WATER LINE 1 ,1 - 2 '11 4 91 â€¢ -Ug-ug- GAS LINE 3 - Fo - UNDERGROUND FIBER OPTICS 1|1 -0-0- CHAINLINK FENCE THREE -STORYWOOD FUME CONSTRUCTION . f WIâ„¢ STONE ./RIOR 4 I -0-0 - WOODEN FENCE i 6 5 -I-x- WIRE FENCE 8-WOODCOLUMNâ„¢p. - 4 . 2 * -iÂ·* I.I; c k ~ : ; iÂ·4.- OVERHANG â„¢P < 0 .~ BOULDER 1 |, SHINER TRA;H WINDOW WINDOW ~ ruPPERIEVELDECKS(STACKED]TYPÂ· ~~|~ ~Nj~71.oc)' til~L_aJ l-J 1-1. 1 7 1-Ely 1 LEI DECIDUOUS TREE , i-t 5 4 9 : L //. FFOUNOr ft B.t=g=;:RNAIL--42 C 7 4, CONIFEROUS TREE T- T --- T .lill T -/F T-T -- 7 //-1. g < Ll. ILIEGIBLE 1 : I --11 Â·21126.ZiL-~*~59-t~ -1 -E_~2 90/ 1-- e -1.7-;-Â«rt--F- Ll_ irORAMMANHOL.Ex,~--1 J . | 2 1-- r~=4===2. , ,*9" S,Vtl#*E 190.00' ~5~:nh - LS. #161h--- Ug - U T- RIM ELEV. 1 7936.60' Plt\~ 1 1 -0- GAS REGULATOR | 1 Â·Â·Â·Â·-' Â· Â·Â· Â· - -fe'IX' i E- . 41 4-1-3 1 1,i\-Â«Â« 94t <$ 12. IMP JNV. IN W = 7932.30' j/~ 3 -~'ZI~- GA5 SERVICE j 24" CMP INV IN S = 7934.90' 4/I - 5 24" CMP INV OUT N = 7934.88' ~ , 1 99Â«\Vre--1- OECK 1---' 1 DECK Mb' 9-0 01.- 1- Â·rf li--'-_72-111 11 1,0.31=. . 11 r - SIC~ HOTEL. 1 414 U CURB80X 4if~ 34 . - 14 6 709 EAST DURANT . t,11 RIM ELEV. 275*El TWO AND THREEÂ·VORÂ¥ WOOD FRAME CONSTRUCTION L ITINEWALL(FULL HEIGHT)TYP. in li I 9 INV. OUT = INACCCESSIBi.E WITH 5TONE EXTERIOR ~ L UPPER LEVEL DECKS (STACKED) TYP. SUMP = 7936.22. 19.492 sq.ft.* L ROOF OVERHANG TIP, 1-/1 1 - Url CATVSERVICE-E 10 1/ TWO -5TORY WOOD FRAME CON5TRUCTION 1 1 .1. WITH 5T0NE EXTERIR r STONE WALL TELEPHONE SERVICE -/Â©8 |HI 1.~ -~ 3 11.1 /- -F= U. 1 4 {FUU HEIGHT) in] /GIVEL I 1 4 TIMBER TRUSS GASSERVICE-~~_.IM - ~; 0 = VI 1 1 GRAPHICSCALE I /PWOODCOLUMNTYP- n -EN. 1 FE _Li - )*1 i j ,- WINDOW WAI ~1 ~ SLAi~S Â®|#< | ~OV~~ED WA+KWAY | DECK ' | DECK I DECK ~ j .~ 4 DECK CO.~ERED WALKWAY I F=911 :1 mil 1 -\40 - / rmy 1,#0# .~1 2 {INFEET) SrORM MANHOLE l RIM ELEV.. 7942.W POOL DECK E / FFOUND).0'WITNESS a-> linch =NO ft 24- CMP INV. IN = 7935.89' + / /5ZZ*-1 CORNER CONCRETE SURFACE ~ ~ /OIL / 1 4 1 --60 / -1 24 IMP INV. OUT - 7935.79' 0 P K. NAIL AND SHINER U. ASPHA~SURFACE / MA >M :f ": < &~ .7 - 364944Â«49 ./ 1 1 #28643 av/., =-1---22-1 ntlub 1 1 A l *09 3;BN - , , UN--_ \ 4 flug - 11& UM - UM -----_ ah ~ 4 Â»86im,1~652â„¢ir- 11& 41_341-r- 1.25- PlASTICCAP - -- -- - --LS.#1612* -- _- --*_j . 7/ L T SEWER MANHd[E 41*4 N 7 1 \ lf\Â»tx. -LE<*f 132_-2 -__2Â»___ __,-0_11_-2__-- -- RIM ELEV..7 -LAND/ 3 83 1/ W liu 1 1 / 1 / /11.- FOUND P.K. NAILAND INV.IN PRIVATE) 32.51' 7934.77' E w.4 9 1 7*Â« //- 29[ 1 SHINERLS#28643 0-94-fii i ~ = 793178' .6 ~ LI 73'32'49Â· W XgLE NX Of 2 7 1.-- i ./ 91 SWMERLÂ©~*US I Â· ~ 4 2% AN<\, hi< 1 1 SOPRIS ENGINEERING - LLC CIVILCONSULTANTS 502 MAIN STREET, SUITE A3 NOT. ACCORINGTOCCLCRADOLAWYOUMUSTCOMMENCEAN,4EGAL ACT:ON 8~ED UPON ANY DECE(7 IN -HIS SURVEY ./MIN â„¢REE YEARS CARBONDALE, COLORADO 81623 AFTERYOug,AST.,528vERSuCHDEFECT INNOEVENTMAY'-ACION ~SED UPON ANY DEFEC-,N THIS SuRVEÂ¥ 8E COMMENCED MORE -HAN TEN 'ARS 'ROM -HE DATE OPCERT ACATION SIOWN HEREON (970) 704-0311 1401901 .07/13/2015 G.2014.019'.SURVE./WIS.:RVEÂ¥.LOT/14.19_,SP_/UDDWG -'- Z 2 V - -2 PROP05ED ADA RAMP - 1 SITE IMPROVEMENTS LEGEND SPILLCURal -- - -- GUTTERÂ· TYPE B <00 -3 -- - ~ VI - - - -- -Â·- - - - - EXISTiNG EASEMENT (02 - - : < EXISn NG PROPERTY UNE loo APPROXIMATE LIli. -.-. . - 5Â· SETBACK --f .-I : Â£00 - OF ..URBANCE - - . 4 --.. = PROPOSED LIMITS OF DISTURBANCE - ~ PROPOSED STORM SEWER -. ~PROPOSED ' CÂ© r- 80.4 t? VENUE - - PROPOSED . 4 '0 AOA MAMP - -- Ii' .0- -~ \4 ~ - ' Â· ~ PROPOSED ASPHALT PAVEMENT CR,â€¢IG-E AÂ· (41 ON STREET-r EASEMENT'-1 .r - ,~ PROPOSED CONCRETE PAVEMENT 4 PARIONG 5TAILS ~ 20/ PROPO5ED GUTTERÂ· TYPE A BARRIERCURB & -- $ 4 plopOSED PERMEABLE PAVERS ADA RAMP -- RAISEDCURB -*fl PLANTER ISLAND â€¢ 75 0 PROPOSED LANDSCAPING , g 3 + PROPOSED ROW 1 BARRIER CURB & ~ 6 j --* ADA RAMP . X EXI-ING ATTACIED ' GUTTER- TYPEA r F SIDEWALK (SÂ·Fri, ' . 18 0'WIDE - 2 PRIVATE, NONÂ·EXCLUSIVE ..4 Â» k' 1 .7 , INGRIS/EGRESs EAIMENT FOR CHATEAU CHAUMINT F I-/AND CHATEAU DUMONT .14' 1 /7 1 e PER PLAT - - U 4 1.-Â· 9 319 f 5 0' W. DRAINAGE % 2 j .t 73:f-- , AND.BUT'I....War~ 1 - 1 PERP. ' PROPERTY LINE - ; P..1. 89 Â¤ 53= CHATEAU DUMONT PEDESTRJAN SERVICEENTRANCE / EASEMENT , I _' ./ 10.8' WIDE DRAINAGE PERTHIS PLAT 3' MIN ; Al D l.rrILITY EAS El E NT CHATEAU CHAUMONT lit- b.1 PEDESTR[AN PER PLAT 1 B-Â· li CORRIDOR - L i ?1 l fl -~ TERED LANDBCAPE AREA I i .23;3-1 :# 4 4, FCR WATER QUALg-f * 2 5 E-* 1 / 4 0 9 '2%07 - .1 12 L.1.-1 8, ~3@2 ' CONCRETE O 1 7 *-f TIATMENT / DRAIN PAN ..It g.4 Ff -: ' fi DROP OFF PARKING AND . = % m u 8 - Â£.. if j , VALETSERVICEAREA E)(5TING WALL 2 2 5 :. 1 1. . 6.0' WIDE DRAINAGE & u 007 :-It~~- , , P , AND UTILI. EASEMENT O 2-3 2 U 2094' PER PLAT PROPOSED~ ~' If f 2- .1 ADA RAMP MECHANICAL AIR INTAKE i f- -- 1 , p WITH GRATE : ' E-1 --- ~-~>ciÂ· 1 1 2 1 +A .1/ C 4 11 0 ~ J MA[N ENTRANCE - ..2, I ....794186 j~ 1 709 E. DURANT AVE 4/ ----F-t-4 20.0 ALLE. ROW 1 / 3-1 11 1 40 SKY HOTEL DOCK AREA BLOCK 107 ALLEY / , ft-* r .4, ' - 40 0, T Â£ BEGIN DERED WALL .. DUE TO} 30'~ LIMIT ROW' LOT: 42,336 SF W.IN S.BACK - nERED 9 1 1 122'ZZW . LANDSCAPING'NAIL GATE//00. CONTROLLED /ING s, UM.E. TO 30 (REFERTOARCHITECTURAL & - LIMITED TO 30- GARAGE ACCESS LANDSCAPE PLANS FO. ROOFTOP ..WITHIN 5ET8ACK LANDSCAPING WALL PEDESTRIAN .- IMPROVEMENTS) WITHIN SETBACK 51X (6)STEP 5 PROPOSED .930*3 :. 7 'ISE ~ ~ 11 TREAD ADA RAMP 4 ~beD*- 5 ECON'/00. I -4*132 TERRACE LANDSCAPE PLANS FOR SECOND ~ ~ - (REFER TO ARCHITECTURAL & GLORY HOLE LOOR TERRACE IMPROVEMENT') _~ PROPOSEDCURB 17=1 -1 CONDOMINIUMS I. - -.*. { 11 1 - PROPOSED -Al'.1 -44< ) 1 ~ ~p~ ~~ S'.* IA , O ADA RAMP VO, ; 2 BEUSEDFORWATER 1 # -- nERED LAND5[APE AREA TO QUALITY TREAâ„¢ENT BARRJER CURB & GUT-rER- r,PE A ' , PER COA STANOAR. 007 -4.4- or- 7 \\72 5: f/\// CENTERUNE OF 12.00' WIDE -%-V - r.- M/*WEL .'-12, 0 --00.- ./4 1 ~R~EMEN~AD~~GREE~/EGRE5S -- - , u PROPERTY LINE 01 PROPOSED 60 GRANTED BY ASPEN Col<k- \\ - AOA RAMP -2. 1 '0 ALP&OWNERS TO HANS 8, CANâ„¢UP - 1 (NOW SKY HOTEL) - - t 1% . - BK,327 PG 777 CENTERLINE OF 13.830 WIDE EASEMENT 3% \-5 Z ~ AGREEMENT FOR PRIVATE / 77- Â°m .-4 ROADWAY/INGRESS/EGRESS GRANTED BY 3 I ~ ASPEN ALPSOWNERSTOHAM. , GRAPHIC SCALE CANTRUP INOW SKY HOTELI - 01 i B. 3279/777 20 .,r- UTE AVENUE PEDE 5TRIAN CORRIDOR. 6.91' J 9 - -tiÂ·-:LK ASPEN ALPS BUILDING 100 ( IN FEET ) ASPEN ALPS 1 inch = 20 f. - (100 BLD) 1 - PLAT BK. ZA PG. 304-308 \ \ 1 Know whars below. DATE 7-14-15 Ca|| before you dig. JOB NO 14040 CALL 2-8U/NESS DAYS IN ADVANCE WAT#-MU#57 SHEET Cl MEMBER lmUNE5 AbllSNOO Al 03133HD 31Â¥(] 91VllIN I Dll '9 1N3IAId 13A303hI 131OH AMS Ag 03NE)1930 1 52-N 3ANBAV 1NVMACI '3 602 Ae NMVHO Nyld SlN3IAI3AObldFJI 31IS THE LITTLE NELL HOTEL 31VO AW NOISIA38 NO[1Â¥Ollddy M3IA3H (]3llÂ¥13(1 1N30,Id013A3(] (]3NN\fld 6 1 01 EXISTING & PROPOSED LEGEND m2g 1 2## ~ : " lili EXiSTING CONTOUR 8 IL. '4 7900 EXISTING CONTOUR INTERVAL 02 r '06 -- -Â· EXISTING WATER MAIN 13'00 -- . 1 - EXISTING SANITARY SEWER MAIN to/ .' - -- -- EXISTING ELEC TELE CAILE GAS /(PE 8 5.1, CURB ' EXISTING ELE.,TELE CABLE Â£00 EXISTING GAS : -- -EXISTING TELEPHONE - - EXISTING UNDERGROUND ELECTRIC , 1- - EXISTING CASLE - Co? 2. 4 02 .... -- (' 1 2 . / -Â£00 EXISTING OVERHEAD ELECTRIC DURANTAVENUE /__ - -- EXISTING FIBER OPTIC EXISTING IRRIGATION PIPE TYPE A CATCH CURD,f i EXISTING STORM SEWER I --------- EXISTING EASEMENT 2Â· WIDE EXITING PROPERTY LINE POW 2 0' 8 i : DRAIN CHASE EXISTING ELECTRIC MANHOLE Tri AFATCH CURB : 2 - 4 '2#ls - -- "11 - SETBACK (5Â·I =221 0 MATCH EX 7938.04 u EXISTING DRAINAGE DRY .WELL EXISTING SEWER MANHOLE *TOW 3 4, 0 Â·i EXISTING TELEPHONE MANHOLE 3 0 ~MATCH EX:79381. EXISTING UTILITY MANHOLE Y + -- ./.SCAPE AREA . - . EXISTING FIRE HYDRANT IBRC 1) $ TOC..7 5/ , .~ EXISTING WATER VALVE 1 1- TOC: 7938 85' TOC:7938.58Â· TOC:7938.71 #*9 -, / / EXISTING GAS METER EXISTING CURB STOP 099 f FE.7938 0 EX]STING ELECTRIC TRANSFORMER IE EXISTING ELECTRIC METER (n 09 1 -. P .'11 ' _ ' EXISTING TELEPHONE PEDESTAL Z g EXISTING CATV PEDESTAL <.: 5 tvo- EXISTING SEWER CLEANOUT EXISTING LIGHT POLE 0 3 5: TOC:7938.. '.L ,~ Lg H EXISTING SIGN Z Z Ed / LANDSCAPE ISLAND . , TIC:7938.84 EXISTING STORM INLET LU 0 29 .i . TBD TO 8E DETERMINED U .02' 0 APPR*IMATE L.fTS CHATEAU DUMONT k T. URIANCE ' imi COA CITY OF ASPEN TYPE 8 SPILL CUR8 VALET LANE 0 % 2% 2 \# U / 0 7901- PROPOSED CONTOUR SLOPE TO PAN FLOWLINE 0- : f -'.I - PROPOSED CONTOUR INTERVAL ' 1 LW 2 Lu .. . TIERED IANDS. APE AREA FOR O b WATER QUALI Y TREATMENT / PROPOSED STORM SEWER (0 - U. , I (BRE-2) - - i, Â· - PROPOSEDELEC TELE CABLE FIBER Ok 2 4-Odd ScÂ· :21 :, Toe 7940.82' TOC.7941.20 - -- - - PROPOSED GAS 4 - - I - pROPOSED TELEPHONE -0.- PROPOSED LIMITS OF DISTURBANCE t 1 0/2 2 0 ~~~~ PROPOSED UNDERGROUND ELECTRIC 2 - -- - PROPOSED CABLE ADA RAP 34' '94'Â»~~CL~ . 4 % 0 .1 - - - PROPOSED FIBER OPTIC - PROPOSED STORM HIET 1 1 1 -1 FEE 7942 00 3 . 03. TOI 7941.37 / 1 =1 PROPOSED ASPHAL T PAVEMENT I l -1. . 0. . , _ -I % SITE BENCHMARK ~EE NOTE THIS SHEET . r.' U M 1396 Â·mi, r. PROPOSED COIJCRETE PAVEMENT TOC:7941 86' FFE.7940 83 is 9-. EDA 794321 - L 2 036 - 1- PROPOSED PERMEAXE PAVERS BLOCK 107 2 1 - 0 70( 7941.86 TOC,7942.00 41112 â€ž ALLEY ~ --Â·Â·Â·--Â·Â·.~..~ ~ ~_ _ SKY HOTEL 709 E DURANT AVE LOT: 42,336 SF PROPOSED LANDSCAPING TOC:7942.07' -421 WALL 30" M.- , - -&2043.961'-x. BOA 7944.11 IP 7943,22' 6 STEPS'ATTH 0 4 U TOC:7942.40' 3 2Â°' -0 01///9 '4, 41 ' TREAD --r *m"IN@ / ---#'RAMP - 1 * --' TOC:7942 45' TOC:7942.96' 6 \ r RISE N EDA=7944.1:*-, ADA RAMP FFE:7940.83' EOA 7944.31 9 .-1 4* TOC:7940+75' . 07 ' TIC:7942.13' , r{3325 TOC:7940.83' TOCÂ·7940.75 5 ECOND FlOOR , FFE:7940.83' TERRACE f <94. 2 34 TIEREDLANDSCAPE AREA FOH TOC:7942.43' ,< TOW'7944.53 00 WATER QUALITY TREATMENT - - -2 - 1 ;1, 4 4, e 4 CURB CUT:7945.440 0 .-41 1 6 MYCH EX:7942.64 TOCÂ·7943.33 lot-79-4-89' ~ '_ k I~ - --- - .325 3 F TIERED LANDSCAPE AREAT - (ER[ 71 4 1 9 TOW*Â° I 0 .9- :/ - - e MATCH EX.7943.0'* . < . T $ * 4.. 06 ,/ .1 <f '07 - ' 3 / TOC 7944.75' 6 / w. -_ MATCH EX:7946,1'I 1- 2946 - DoÂ·~ f 4,0, O - - - 0/ i 1 ' i Or///// EDA HP:7946.33' -- _. 0, 4 -- FLi~Â»621: _ f.- \ MATCH Ex,7944.0,1 07 MATCH EX:7946.24 K - - GRAPHIC SCALE / 00, 9,7945 00' - f MATCH EX:'?)'i ( IN FEET ) MATCHEX:?Â»4 1 inch = io ft. - go' MATCH EX:Â»74 - ASPEN ALP5 BUILDING 100 MATCH EX:???'y * -- SPOT ELEVATION LEGEND SITE BENCHMARK 8Ags OF ELEVATION: AN ELEVATION OF 7911 98 (NAVD 1988)ON THE BOW = BOTTOM OF WALL NGS STATION 'Q-1591% PER THE 2009 CITY OF ASPEN G. CONTROL EOA = EDGE OF ASPHALT SURVEY. THIS ESTABLISHED THE LOCAL SITE BENCHMARK OF 7940 72' Ex = EXISTING GRADE ON THE #5 REBAR AND 1 25" PLASTIC CAP, STAMPED L.S #16129, FFE = FINISHED FLOOR ELEVATION MONUMENT1NG AN ANLE POINT l N THE EASTERLY BOUNDARY LINE AS SHOWN HEREON FG= FINISHEDGRADE FL = FLOW LINE HP = HIGH POINT LP = LOW POINT Cd-n MATCH EX = MATCH EXISTING {â€¢111. RIM =RIM ELEVATION TBC = TOP BACK OF CURB TOC = TOP OF CONCRETE 2.05 Know what's beloW. DRAINAGE DIRECTIONSLOPE - Cal|before you dig. -6/X:XXX.XX' SPOT ELEVATION .r CAU 2-/SINE5S DA. [N ADVANCE DATE 7-14-15 y--TIC:7900.00' M=AH-= EXAMPLE TOP OF CONCRETE @ 790000Â· = -â‚¬pt ~E}â€¢leER UT,UnES JOB NO 14040 SHEET C2 1SNO0 Ag 03)133HO 31VO 91Â¥IlINI '311 'DNIW33NI Al DENE)1930 ~ 3AN3AV 1NVblna '3 602 AS NMVID OUTHSPRING ST. 4 r ' CLE~COO~~ID) 31V0 AG NOISiA38 ON 1N30Id013A303hI 131OH AMS NV-Id 1ObllNOO NOISOMB 19 DNIaÂ¥hID N011Â¥OllddV /63IA323 0313130 1N31Nd013A30 03NNV1d 12 5 r-----_- --- CONCEPTUAL POST DEVELOPMENT ONSITE PEAK RUNOFF RATES: < LL Le 2Â§ b BASIN C10 I AREA Q10 BASIN Cloo I AREA Q100 Z --- DURANT AVENUE -- - ID lin/hr) (acre) (cfs) ID (in/hi (acre) (cfs) ... - 470 PIPE ~SIZETO BE CONFIRMED PROI?OSED INLET AND 5TORM 1 0.40 3.72 0033 0.048 1 0.52 6.32 0.033 0.107 ~ PRICRTO BUILDING PERMIT 2 0.86 3.72 0 053 0,168 2 0.91 6.32 0.053 0 302 0.005 6.32 0005 0.033 SUB~lITTAL 6.32 0.125 3 092 3.72 0.019 3 0.96 BRC-1: LOCATED WITHIN LANDSCAPINGAREAFORREQ. 4 0.49 3.72 0.034 0.062 4 0.58 0.034 L â€¢â€¢s,â€¢ 13 WATER QUALI/ TREATMENT -h<' ~ - \L_y - v. Â· 1 ~ FOR 8.SIN .4 4'V . .7 e. ..'\ PERMEAILE PAVERS 5 0.67 3.72 0102 0.255 5 0 74 632 0.102 0.479 A o I / 6 0.57 3.72 0119 0.253 6 0.65 6.32 0119 0.491 : PROPOSED INLETAND STORM A A PIPE (5'ZE TOBECONFLE:MED ,1 ifloc~:. . . InlrÂ·.1 - 7 0.65 3.72 0 034 0.083 7 0.72 6.32 0.034 0 156 0 PRIORTIBUILDINGPERMET ~'NE 9 - - - -= = - -- - -=- --- - - - - - -- --- - 8 0.73 3.72 0197 0.535 8 0.79 6.32 0.197 0984 SUBM-al Â·_I \ _LIT..2/ ./. Pl % 073 3 71 00& 0 242 9A 0.31 6.32 0087 0444 10 0077 -- --- --- - - 98 067 3.72 0 099 0.246 98 0.74 6,32 0.099 0.461 / T ....1 11 Â£-i- ~| BASIN #5 M~. W E-- 074 3.72 0.077 012.2 10 0.80 6,32 0.390 Z 11 0.69 3.72 0.072 0136 11 0.75 632 0.072 0,343 iÂ· Â£1-ji I - 12 0.92 3.72 0.003 0 011 12 0.96 6.32 0.003 0.020 4-1 11 8ASIN #4 I 13 0.40 3.72 0.001 0.002 13 0.52 6.32 0.001 0.003 :14 0.65 3.72 0 026 0.064 14 0 72 632 0.026 0.120 1--- 15 061 3.72 0 048 0.109 15 068 6.32 0.048 0.206 (SS-11 SILVA CE_L 5 LOÂ¢ATE~,ON /1 12_ 1r--- CHATEAU CHAUMONT CHATEAU DUMONT SUBJECIPROFERIAND OSED -- CONCEPTUAL WATER QUALITY TREATMENT SUMMARY TABLE: 441 FOR WATER QUA~11, TREATMENT : . p v- ]IL . FOR BASIN #2 2, 6.-Â·.Â·'1 j 0 , 1 , BRI-2Â· LOCATED WITHIN WQCV REQ WQCV PROPOSED ./ WQ CONTRIBUTING AREA % -3 2.1 1 LANDSCAPINGAREATOPROVIDE A REQ WATER QUAUTY TREATMENT I.D. BASIN S.F. IMPERV DEPTH (in) (cf) TREATMENT LOCATION Z - BASIN #6 I. C. m -1 - -h..N- 7-; 1 FORBASIN#5 -- - LANDSCAPINGALONGNORTHSIDEOF BRC-1 4 1491 54% 0125 16 5 mo: .....11 . 8UILDING D.9 3 146 1 BRC-2 5 4464 849h 0 185 69 LANDSCAPING ALONGEAST SIDEOF SITE O uo ZZ h BRE-3 7 1492 31% 0 120 22 ROOF TOP PLANTER LU 0 5/Fh BRC-5 11 3149 85% 0.190 50 LANDSCAPINGAREA WESTOF ALPS PARKING 2 4 &- 55, 1 X ~ 'F '1 BRC-4 10 3362 89% 0 205 57 LANDSCAPING AREA SOU-H OF PATIO U (Noel 7.45 i 1 ~,9 SP/-1: UNDERGROUND SAND FILTER 2092 7* 0160 28 LANDSCAPING AREA WEST OF ALPS PARKING 1 5 < u. BROS 15 Â·4 TREATMENTVAULTTO PROVIDE REI. k-Af r--7. . i Â· 4.u_ WATER QUALITY TREATMENT FOR 8RC-7 8 2588 38% 0.200 143 LANDSCAPINGAREA EASTOFBUILDING U 8.ASIN #1: . . PERMEABLE PAVERS --0 - c .Â· 1 . 1-~ --- - |1Â· BASIN#6 WITHINPARKINGZONE |, .;Â·''p -2 1 7 1- -----=----- -~ 10:12'.4.5'(DJ w CONTRIBUTING ~ AREA % 4- -- 1 ---. LI. 11 ~ ESTiMATED DIMENSION: ~ *QCV WQCV PROPOSED J I -3 1.0 BASINS 1 S.F IMPERV DEPTH lin) 16) TREATMENT LOCATION 1~# 4-------------=------1------ S 55-1 2 | 2288 971 0.250 48 WITHIN SILVA CELL GROW MEDIA 1 ! BASIN #9,0, ELE s BLOCK 107 ALLEY BRC-3. LOCATED WITHIN ROOFTOP , WQ CONTRIBUTING AREA % .QKN REQ. WQCV PROPOSED {70 - m ---7-"UPLA,/perrO,PRO,!Or'MIEUWRT'er- m - m 1--- m QUAUT,TREATMENT FOR ISAIN #7 %- I.D. BASIN S.F. IMPERV DEPTH (in) (cY) TREATMENT LOCATION -11 9 BtLOW GRADE INALLEV ALONG EAST SIDE OF /4 r--t--7--11_4-j' ' ' SFV-1 6 5205 74% 0.15 65 BUILDING t. JLLLI .. .. JL.4,/.I - 1 BASIN 411 , - SFV-2 9A 3774 1 0.21 66 LANDSCAING AREA 'WESTOF ALPS PARKING Â°12 GLORY HOLE SFI-3 98 4298 84% 0.185 66 LANDSCAPING AREA '*EST OF ALPS PARKING CONDOMINIUMS ~ ~i- --~Y HOTEL STORMWATER MJT]GATIONDESIGN ILLUSTRATED HERE]h I CONCEPTUAL SIZIhIG LOCATION PARTOFBASIN#:~~ 709 E. DURANT AVE r- LOT: 42,336 SF ----- 11 AND TYPES OF ALL WATER QUALITY TREATMENT AND DRAINAGE INFRASTRUCTURE TO BE CONFIRMED~FINALIZED PRIOR TO BUILDiNG PERMIT APPL CATI.' BRC-7 WITHIN LANDSCAPING PROPOSED LEGEND /Â· BASIN #98 BASIN #8 WATER QUALITY TREATMENT , il FOR BASIN #8 TIERED TO I -11 -tr ACCOMMODATE GRADE -79/- PROPOSEDCONTOURINTERVAL DIFFERENT'Al 1. 7 - , L 1 AREA TO PROVIDE REG. PROPOSED COrITOUR -2/r * PROPOSED FLOW ARROW 0 U j 1 ----- POST DEVELOPMENT DRAINAGE BASI~1 --. 1 | i rn u#= 1.- PROPOSED STORM SEWER PR0P059=5--U- L-- BASIN #15 1 1 --- -- - 1 1 - A o~SIGN POINT .4 \2<L /- nlp'' 1 ---25-- / 8A5IN #10 : PROPOSED CURB CUT k N#11 PROPOSED A3PHALT FAVEME~ IT BASIN #3 . /0 TOREMAIN Â· '\ 1 PROPOSEDCONCRETE PAVEMENT Z PERMEABLE PAVERS ISTTNG OR'AVELL El -- Ill 1Â£ Â· ;PROPOSED PERMEABLEPAVERS LI BRO 5 TO PROVIDE WATER 72-777=~ QUAUTÂ¥ FOR BA5IN 11 L EXISTINGVAlLEYPANAND 9 1 SEV* UNDERGROUND SAND ALTER TREATMENT TREN(;H DRAIN TO REMAIN PROPOSED LANDSCAPING 1-- VAULTTO PROVibE REa. WATER QUAUTY . TREATMENT FOR BA511'1 #98 j .. PROPOSEC INLET AND STORM 10'xlb/+ID) / PIPEISIZETO,ECONFIRMED __--~ EXISTING LEGEND Z SFV-2 UNDERGROUND SAND FILTER TREATMENT VAULT TO < i PRIOR TC BUILDING PERMIT PROVIDE RE[1 WATER QUALITY TREATMEMT FOR BASIN NA EXISTING CONTOUR -j SUBMITT.1 10//A.5'(01 ASPEN ALPS BUILDING 100 7Cr,o - -- BASIN 14 ~ EXISTING CONTOUR INTERVAL [1- BRC 4. LOCATED WITHIN /1\ )L- PERMEABLE PAVERS & BRCÂ·6 TO PROVIDE WATER LANDSCAPING AREA TO / A / LANDSCAPE AREA QUALITY FOR BASIN 15 - PROVIDED REQ. WATER -/ ~\ QUALiTY TREATMENT FOR BASIN #10 ..2*27- % EC f LU % _1 <C D 8 5 0 GRAPHIC SCALE 1 DATE 7-14-15 1 IN FEET ) .108 NO 14040 1!nch = 20 ft. SHEET C3 NOUOAMiSNOO Eggig 1 27/J 2 Â° Ali 0349193(3 ~ BAN,AÂ¥ iNÂ¥800 3 I NMVIO Al 03>~33HD 'Dll 'DNIN33NID EKEO-*01-(01 THE LITTLE NELL HOTEL 3190 18 INOISIA3~j de'Wadr- - Hdo S 133rOEId 1N3Vyd013A303B 131OH A>IS Millal 0311Â¥130 1N3Vyd013A30 (]3NNV1d EXISTING & PROPOSED LEGEND EXISTING CONTOUR 6 , 790' - ExlS TNG CONTOUR INTERVAL -y 1 -- - - EXISTING WATER MAIN M 1- 1 0 EXISTING SANITARY SEWER MAIN CONNECTSTORMPIPETO -7 - - EXISTING ELEC TELE CABLE GAS 425 EXISTING MAMIE ~ , 4 % INVÂ·793254 .A'. RIM:793629' . 41 r , N - --- EXISTING ELEC TELE. CABLE rn k- M. - - EXISTING GAS 003 TYPE B SPILL CURB VALET LAN, . - EXISTING TELEPHONE ZZ 1 SLOPE TO PAN FLOWLIVE REMOVEE]liT- - 1 hi - /1 9 c - IN~TALL NEW STORM DRAIN INLET CURB INtETS u '84 --- -- EXISTING UNDERGROUND ELECTRIC 8 AND 5TRUCTURE - EXITING OVERHEAD ELECTRIC PER COA STANDARDS INLET SIZE TBD RIM. 7937.06' - ~ INSTALL 40 LF i EXISTING CABLE INV 7934 34' Â· ~ 6-3" ROP PIPE (SIZE TO BE CONFIRMED'Â°1 - ~ PRIOR TO BUILDING PERMITI ,4 - EXISTING IRRIGATION PIPE EXISTING FIBER OPTIC EXISTING STORM SEWER -- -PROPOSED -* , . + C OURANTA VENUE 49 - ----- j~- -- - EXIST!/G EASEMENT EASEME.7 1/ i x -7 : 2 -, ' .. r , ~ - g -1- â€¢â€¢ - SETBACK i. '04, AÂ«U EXISTING PROPERTY LINE 9 INSTALL NEW 5TORM DRAIN / EXISTING ELECTRIC MANHOLE 'r,A' 70'. RJM:793647' - 2 W[DE , IZE TB D . _ EXISTING DRAINAGE DRY WELL !NET PERCOA STANDARDS / INV 7933.38 . DRAIN CHASE EXISTING TELEPHONE MANHOLE EXISTING SEWER MANHOLE ......,4, 6/t Â· ~ INSTALL 50 U + f 'qu ' EXISTING UTILITY MANHOLE 4 - ly Rop p,PE (SIZE TO BÂ£ CONFIRME[I Ucif / PROF TO BUILDING PERMI EXISTING FIRE HYDRANT 1.1 362 .VA CE11% ,. 10' i 9 6' Plt "AR '8~S 1~ EM|snrG ELECTRIC TIANSFORMER PIPE FOR BRE 1 EXISTING WATERVALVE 41 OVERFUOW INLET EX,STING CURB STOP DRAINAGE ~ EXISTING GAS METER ' Af 1 2 LANDICAPE AREA FOR l . 1 ORIuo,â€ž m~u ' ~ U - BIC 2 2 EXISTING CATV PEDESTAL WATER QUALITY -STING ELECTRIC METER TREATMENT{BRE 1) m " 3 EX]STING TELEPHONE PEDESTAL ' 9 IRM-OWN ~14\33 - EXISTING SEWER CLEAMOIT _ EXISTING LIGHT POLE - 5 0 WIDE DAAINAGE , EXISTING SIGN . PUBtIC ILL - e REMOVE EXISTING DRYWEI COA CITY OF ASPEN AND Ur,Un EASEMENT a EXISTINGSTORM INLET E 3 Â»9 c I. ~1 4 PER PlAT TBD TO BE DETERMINED , PEDESTRIAN 7901 - PROPOSED CONTOUR O LA C)/31 5 3 5093 i ' 14 PER TH!5 PLAT PER PLAT losÂ·WIDE DRAINAGE EASEMENT PR#05EOPERMEAELE ANDITIUY EASEMENT -7900.-I--I PROPOSED CONTOUR INTERVAL Z Z %<.Â° PAVER' 2,6. 1/ LLJ O Â§90 CHATEAU DUMONT CHATEAU CHAUMO TrpE .SPILLCURB VALET.NE 1602 LF 12 PVC DRAIN PIPE , PROPOSED STORM SEWER SLOPE TO PAN FLOWLINE M W =@SE (SZE'OBECONFIRMED.mOR - - - PROPOSED Eli TELE CABLE T(} ..ING PERMIT) - - - - PROPOSED GAS 02 - 0 TIERED .AN/5CAPE AREA FOR - - -- - PROPOSED TELEPHONE 1 W WATER QUALITY TREATMENT O (88.-4 ---- PPOPOSED UNDERGROUND ELECTRIC - - - - PROPOSED CABLE (/) - 60' WIDE DRAINU,GE i , 0 ./DITILITY EAGEMENT - PROPOSED FISER OPTIC , .,,,.1 ' 7 y PER PLAT E PROPOSED STORM INLET ADARAM f . 4. (SEV U , - - PROPOSED LIMITS OF DISTURBANCE UNDERGROUNOWATER QUALITY TREATMENT VAULT 20* L.P. TRAFFIC RATED TRENCH - DRAIN TO INTERCEPT OFâ„¢TE PROPOSED ASPHALT PAvEMENT ALLEY RUNOFF IL 24* LF. TRAFFIC RATED TRENCH -. 75* LF. 6' PVC DRAIN PIPE - DRAIN TO INTERCEPT ONITE PROPOSED CONCRETE PAVEMENT [SIZE TO BE CONFIRMED r RUNOFF FOR WATER QUALITY 1 PRIOR TOBUILDING PERMIT} NT SITE BENCHMARK + PROPOSED PERMEABLE PAVERS VE NOTE THIS SHEET 1 1 -:- PROPOSED LANDSCAPING il j 5KY HOTEL BLOCK 107 ALLEY 709 E. DURANT AVE 1 - + -f; 1 LOT: 42,336 SF 1 -4 --- - ' I...- b I. INSTALL NEW TRENCH DRAIN DEFORf ACCE55 DOOR 140* LF SLOT DRAIN I ' 4:' , CONNECT TO PROPOSED UNDERGROUND SAND FILTER TREATMENT VAULT OR ALTERNATE WATER CONNECT PROPOSED LANDSCAPE AREA FOR WATER Q"ALITY TREATMENT FACIlITY --- RCPSTORMP.T.1 QUALITY TREATMENT ' EXISTING MANHOLE, n / -FF :i~:-2 (BRC-61 ./ OVERFLOW INLET RIM:7942 54, 11//:7935 8* QUALITY TREATMENT VAULT / I: Dir UNDERGROUND WATER i W.â‚¬ 7 (SFV 2) j OVERFLOW / \ \--r- QUALITY TREATMENT VAULT ~ 4 41 ~ ri UNDERGROUND WATER 1Nl ET GLORY HOLE 9 8RC 4 13#L F .PVCJ DRAIN [5. 3] OVERFLOW IN' CONDOMINIUMS (BAC-5) W/OVERFLOW INLET LINE AND INLETS FOR N LANDSCAPE AREA FOR WATER i LANDSCAPING AREA - - , QUALITY TREATMENT 1 / ORAINA(GECURBCUT \ 30,4, 24-REP'TORM PIPE ~ , 2401 . 8" PVC DRAIN ?IPE TIERED LANDSCAPE AREA FOR . WATER QUALITY TREATMENT ls,ZE to BE CONARMED PRion - MIZE TO BE CONFIRMED )~ ~ TO BUILDIN(. PERMIT) ~' ~ _ _ PRIOR TO BUILDING PERMITI # ' 188Â«. 71 /9 . P. TALL NEW STORM / .2 1 - V CONNECT ASPHALT ~721- thKA]N IN LE. PER f OA -- 9- . - STANDARDS Â· ~ ..2 - 14&CrNEUY TYPE A CURB -- 1/24KA ./. 1 -1. I.Â»/ /// & GUTTER PE!13*52NDARDS - - - .._PROTECT EX15TING I \ , lu,85(APE AkA FOR WATER N . 1409 "12~ PVC DRAIN PIPE -1- - DRY.FIL - - (5#ZE TO BE CONARMED - - --. * N ""T\TREATMENT , 'PRIOR TO BUILDING OM - 1 - 1 +BRE 21) -- PROTECT EXISTING 1- - Â» 1 --3 34 & CONG DRAIN PAN -- . I - GRADHIC SCALE fail 0.. . 9/ ~~~~I~ Know whafs below. [ IN FEET ] Cal| before you dig. DATE 7-14-15 1* h = 20 ft. C~L 2-~SNESS DA~ IN ADVANCE JOB NO 14040 SEFORE YOU ... -ADE OR EXCIVATE FOR UIE ).,ARKING OF UNDER~OUND ~EMBER UnUTnE5 SHEET C4 31-V] 91\/IlINI 'Dll 'DNI 18 (]3NDI 930 1 3AN3AV 1NVHAD '3 602 I 03>103HO 8 NMVIC] SOUTHSPRING THE LITTLE NELL HOTEL 31Â¥0 18 NOISIA321 1N3IAId013A303M 131OH AMS NY-Id 39Â¥NIVEIC] N011.VOI-Iddv MBIA38 03llÂ¥130 1N3INd013A30 03NNYId ~ ~ ~/ GENERAL UTILITY NOTES: 1 CINTRACTOR TO COOF'iNATE ABANDONMENT RELOCATION AND BURIAL OF THE EXISTING UTILITIES -* / MTH THE LnLITY PROVIDERS CONTRACTOR TO PROVIDEALL TRENCHING BEDaNG. ANDBACKFILL ~ i L - WORK NECESSARY FOR UTILI/9 RELOCATION THE UTILITY PROVIDER IS TO PERFORM ALL LINEWORK 0 -- ~ 1 tZS-1 - - MF Mi ~ 1 ABANDON EXITHib WATER . THE CONTP ACTOR SHALL CONTAIN HIS CONSTRUCTION OPEBno,is WITHIN THE LIMITS OF CONSTRUCTION CONTRACTOR SHALLNOT OPERATE OUTSIDE THIS AREA FITHOUT THE PRIOR â€ž, 5ERVICE ATIHE - 11 - MA N .A. - CONSENT OF THE PROPERTY OWNERSI 'INVOLVED DEPARTMENTSTANDARDS - ~ r 1- 25 3 THE LICAT DNS OF UNDERGROUND UTILIDES HAVE BEEN PLOTTED .ASED ON UTILITY MAPS. LOCATES 4 089 ,- f J Ntt/t i 1 ~ - OR OTHER MFORMATION PROVIDED BY UTILITY COMPANIES AND ACTUAL FIELD LOCATIONS IN SOME ~NSTANCE S THESE Un UTIES AS SHOWN MAY NOT REPRESENT ACTUAL FIELD CONDITIONS 'iS THE / RES.0.31,1/. OF â„¢E CONTRACTOR TO CONTACT ALL UTILITY COMPANIES FOR FIELD LOCATION OF - <PROP.ED -- . 1 I M , D. 0. m - 8 DURANTAVENUE UT,UnES PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION CRN'.GE -- E..7 7 2 - 4 ALL UTIUIES BOTH UNDERGROUND AND OVERHEAD SHALL BE MAINTAINED IN CONTINUOUS SERVICE ABANDON EXISTING . THROUGHOUT THE ENTIRE CONSTRUCTION PERIOD THE CONTRACTOR SHALL SE RESPONSIBLE AND ~ - VITRIFIED CLAY PIPE SEWER 'i .AILE FOR ANY DAMAGES TO. OR INTERRUPION OF SERVICES CAUSED SY THE CONSTRUCTION - ' - SERVICEATTMEMAN 7 - , - - / 5 CONTRACTOR TO COORDINATE ALL UTILITY LINEWORK WITH THE RESPECTIVE UTILITY COMPANY Â· PERACSDREGULATION' PROPO5ED FIRE DEPARTMENT Â·1, 4 Or-337 -'_ , -~ y. 7 ECTI ~ ~ ANDUTILITYPROVIDERSSPECIFICATIONS - 1 -=In C - APPROXIMATE LOCATION 0, I o PRIOR TO CONISTRUCTION 6 ALL SITE AND UTILITY WORK SHALL BE 1!1 COMPLIANCE WITH CITY OF ASPEN RULES & REGULATIONS 3 i -7 ~~ .1 3 I .1 -1\ ./ I. ' . PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS NOTE: 1 -: PU8L1C IMPROVEMENTS SHALL IE N COMPLIANCE WITH THE CITY OF ASPEN ENGINEERING STANDARDS 1 : AND CITY OF ASPEN ROW STANDARDS PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS IN THE ROW MUST MEET THE CIPÂ·S *., ' Â» CONSTRUCTION AND EXCAVATION STANDARDS 8,1 'l z 18 0 WIDE 1 /Â» .-1 1 ~ PRIVATE NONÂ·Â£.CLUIVE , /â‚¬f ---- 1 i I . 4 1/GRE5WEGRESS EASEMENT u 2 CONTRACTOR TO INSTALL WATER SERVICE PER CITY OF ASPEN STANDARDS A PRE COrISTRUCT10/ MEETiNG 18 REOURED PRIOR TO COMMENCEMENT OF WORK 4. F / ,\ \ / FOR CHATEAU CHIUMONT AND CHATEAU D.MONT .i --' SHALLOW UTILITY NOTES: APPROXIMATE LOCATION OF 1 ALL MINIMUM DEPTHS SEPARATION DISTANCES MATERIALS ANOOR USE OF CONDUIT SHALL BE PROPOSED PVC SEWER SERVICE , N 1 ' PER PLAT / ~1._ Nt~72~Iklplsto'uÂ·no~ --- - ~1 CONFIRME,JANOCCORDINATEDWITHTHEUTILITY PROVIDERPERUTILITYAGREEMENTS PER AC 50 5TANOARDS 1 ' r 1 1.NCM R.EM 8'L PVC 8/5ED ON ./MATED \ 2 ALL U. UTÂ· LINES AND,OR CONDUITS TO BE BACKFILLED WITH SUITABLE MATERIAL FREE OF ROCKS .1 CONCEPTUAL DESIGN 1 ~ 50' WIDE DRAINAGE - - , 92- I USE CLASS 6 AGGREGATE BASE MATERIAL FOR SE[DING ANDOR SUITABLE ONSITE MATERIAL AND UTILITY EASEMENT INSTALL PER UTILITY PROVIDER SPECIFICATIONS BACKFILL TRENCHES WITH SUITABLE ONSITE APPROXIMATE LOCATION OF \ R *1 PER PMT - MATERIALE MINIMUM COMPACTION 950 M PAVED AREAS PROPOSED DOOMESTIC WATER & \ FIRESUPPAE.AN,5ERVICE 1 PUBLIC ~~ - I INÂ·;TALL NEW 12-*8 TEE L8- n ~ i ' 3 GAS AND ELECTRIC TO BE INSTALLED IN SEPARATE TRENCHES SEWER SERVICES TO BE INSTALLED A # GATE VALVE PER CITY OF \ k t' /.f .7. PEDESTRIAN f /'1 /- - 1 MINIMUMIM 10 FROM WATER SERVICESAS FEASIBILE COMMUNCATIONS MAY BE INSTALLED IN EASEMENT J .8 WIDE DRA]NAGE COMBINED TRENCHES PER CONSTRUCTION FEASIBILITY AS LONG AS MINIMUM SEPARATION DISTANCES e ff ASPEN WATER DEPARTMENT \ X , PERTHIS PLAT ELECTRIC, TELEPHONE. CABLE / ,Â· j PER PLAT - AND DEPTHS OF BURY ARE MAINTAINED INSTALL WARNING TAPE OVER ALL UTILITY LINES AND UTILITY EASEMENT ., CHATEAU CHAUMONT O STANDARDS 1 1I . 1 1 1 AND FIBER OPT,r SERVICES ROUTE 5 ./ iii...' 1 INTERNALLY TO MECHANICAL ROOM NEW 3 PHASE HOtÂ¥ CROSS ELECTRIC - CHATEAU DUMONT 2/ REMOVE EXISTING GAS METER i / 9 - TRANSFORMER AND ELECTRIC VAULT UTILITY SERVICE MINIMUM DEPTH i Â£1'11 x.'.......6,%=A.â€ž'E. 1 - ...El------------- --7 9 5 :229 I AND ABANDON EXISTING -1 1 ELECTR,C Â·Â· --Â·----Â·------4 I LA CO LU . 17 E SERVICE IN PLACE As REQUIRED Y ~ f i pâ‚¬/ ~11 ownc & CABLE SERVICES TO NEW CABLE TVÂ·Â·Â·Â· .---Â·-Â·----3 0 z %:2: HOTEL AND TO CHATEAU DUMONT ~ PHONE-Â·Â·-Â·- --------3 0 0 :EFS T.* 1 1 11 -~ g: U I OSI 1. ff- 7144 6 0 WIDE DRAINAGE UTILITY PLAN LEGEND . 2 61: 2 , -0 1 '4 E-Â·-Â·AND UT,tiTY EASEMENT 1 > I / - 0 PROPOSED WATER SERVICE 0- U 1 J 1 PER PLAT - -/ - PROPOSED SANITARY SEWER SERVICE O - -. - PROPOSED GAS (.0 - ABANDON EXISTING TELEPHONE AND CABLE 5ERVICES IN PLACE OR REMOVE - Â£-'; -Â·Â·Â·Â·Â·Â·Â·Â·Â·Â·Â·Â·Â·Â·Â·Â·Â·Â·Â·Â·Â·Â·Â·Â·Â·- ~Tr, - PROPOSED TELE CABLE ELEC & FIBER TRENCH / -~? AS NECE55ARY PER UTILJTY PROVIDER 5 - in - Â· - PROPOSED TELEPHONE ANDARD ~ - ' -1' - PROPOSED UNDERGROUND ELECTRIC , MANDON EXISTING 1 - - i, - PROPOSED CABLE CAST IRON SEWER SERVICE N \11 -,-,- PROPOSED FIBER OPTIC ATTHEMA1NPERAC50 MOVEEXISTINGCAeLE SERVICE FEED 1 . == - - - - PROPOSED STORM SEWER REGULATIONS 3 TO LITTLE NE. INTO PROPOSED K UTILITYTRENCH/EASEMENT ; ABANDON..% 49/ __ i D PROPOSEDELECTRiCTRANSFORMER (4 R PIROPOS E D WATER VALVE 81.ECTRIC METER PER HolY --64r-â€¢f T .ERGYÂ·5 STANDARDS / / ~5' '~ i ><1 PROPOSED GAS METERVALVE m /IM / -a.. ' 0 SKY HOTEL - - \ 2 8 PRoPOSED SEWER CLE ANOUT 709 E. DURANT AVE LOT: 42,336 SF PROPOSED STORM INLET ,. ~ EXISTING WATERMA. J i - 1// - 1 3 REMOVE TELEPHONE ANDCABLE SERVICES â‚¬-=2242 - - ----- EXISTING..ARY SEWER MAIN EXISTING STORM SEWEQ ~ REMOVE EXISTING ELECTRIC TRANSFORMER & METER PER HOLY EXISTNG ELEC TELE CABLE Z - EXISTING ELEC TELE CABLE GAS CROSSENERGGSTANDARDS O EXISTING GAS 03 5 , REMOVE EXI5TING CABl E PEDESTAL EXISTING TELEPHONE W PER COMCAST STANDARD 5 kni -------1 7061 1 2 - EXISTH'G UNDERGROUND ELECTRIC EXISTING OVERHEAD ELECTRIC EXISTING CABLE SECOND LEVEL TERRACE EXISTING FIBER OPTIC 1 6 -,- - EXISTING IRRIGATION PIPE GLORY HOLE CONDOMINIUMS - 1 - --------- EXiSTING EASEMENT i .. _ _ I.- 53..... EXISTING PROPERTY LIlli 2 Â·7 ~ J Â· 42 - 2 L EXISTING ELECTRIC MINHOLE 1 t. -- --- * 49 11 y--- -- EX[STING DRANAGE DRY WELL 0 ~/7 -3% 2 1.-2,3->37< , ELECTRIC VAULT EXISTING FIRE HYDRAIT Z O 1 \ .....lou cao. EXITING SEWER MANHOLE L ~XIEND NEW 3.P>jA . \ L..2\il~ 1 ' ELECTRIC 5ERVICE TO NE-TRANFORMER ' EXISTING WATER VALVE LOCATION EXISTING GAS METER EXISTiNG ELECTRIC TRANSFORMER li- L -1 ; I ir-*r~k 1 / - - 'i EXIST'. ELECTRIC METER - lk~--f-1Â«Â»i 1 / / EXISTING TELEPHONE PEDESTAL - TO BE ABANDONED EXISTING CATV PEDEGTAL 1-Â·l---# , -Fis EXISTINGLIGHTPOLE d - EXISTInG SEWER CLEANOUT RELOCATE EX]STiNG FIRE HYDRANT TO * E XI ST1 NG S TORM I NLE T Z LANDSCAPE AREA PER COA WATER EXISTING 'Gli LU 3 DEPARTMENT .ANDAR/5 L D 0 i , IN.All NEW GAS SERVICE TO BUILDING ~ -1- : PER SOURCE 60,5 REGULATIO. LISTAUL 1-- 34 m> NEW GA' METER AT FACE O~ Bull'ING -- ASPEN ALPS BUILDING 100 - . I /-- r rdTI 1911 GRAPHIC SCALE 22524/116.IIILilli--mr Know whatÂ·s below. Call before you dig. (IN FEET) DATE 7-14-15 C~11 2-BUSNESS DAYS N ADvANCE 1 inch = 20 n 0EFORE YOU DIC GRADE~ CR EXCAVATE FOR THE /%KiNG OF UNDERGROUHD SIZE REDUCED FOR SUBMITTAL JOB NO 14040 11[MeEN UTUTIES SHEET C5 31Â¥0 91VllINI Dll 'DNIB33NIDN 3 A9 O3933HO AD DENDIS30 51NV AÂ¥ 1NVEInG '3 602 48 NMVIO 1Illln 1Vnld30NOD 1N3INd013A303M 131OH AMS AA31Alhl 0311Â¥130 1NBINd013/\30 03NNÂ¥ld SITEWORK GENERAL NOTES LAYOUT & MATERIALS NOTES PLANTING NOTES 6 1. THE GENERAL CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR COORDINATING ALL WORK BY THE 1. LAYOUT AND VERIFY DIMENSIONS PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION. NOTIFY LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT OF ANY 1. PLANT MATERIAL IS TO BE HEALTHY SPECIMENS FREE FROM DISEASE OR DAMAGE, AND IS TO BE SUBCONTRACTORS. DISCREPANCIES. LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT TO REVIEW AND APPROVE ALL- LAYOUTS CONTAINED IN THE MAINTAINED IN EXCELLENT CONDmON WHILE ON THE JOBSITE. LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT SHALL- INSPECT CONSTRUCTION DOCUMENTS PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION. PLANT MATERIAL UPON ARRIVAL TO JOSSITE AND WILL REJECT PLANT MATERLAL THAT DOES NOT MEET rowland+broughton 2. CONTRACTOR SHALL VERIF'( ALL CONDmONS AT JOB SITE AND NOTIFY LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT AND THE STANDARDS DESCRIBED WITHIN THE CONTRACT DOCUMENTS. ar*tedum / urban dealgn / Inte/or de/ga GENERAL CONTRACTOR OF DIMENSIONAL ERRORS, OMISSIONS OR DISCREPANCIES BEFORE BEGINNING 2. WRITTEN DIMENSIONS SHALL TAKE PRECEDENCE OVER SCALED DIMENSIONS. DO NOT SCALE ANY WORK. DIMENSIONS FROM REDUCED DUWINGS. 2. THE LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT WILL PERIODICALLY INSPECT PLANT MATERIAL STOCKPILED AND/OR PLANTED 234 e hopkins ave 1830 blake st. ste 200 ON SITE DURING THE COURSE OF CONSTRUCTION. PLANT MATERIAL NOT MEETING THE STANDARDS aspen, co 81611 denver, co 80202 970.544.900â‚¬3 0 303.308.13730 3. CONTRACTOR TO OBTAIN ALL NECESSARY PERMITS PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION. ALL CONTRACTORS MUST 3. DIMENSIONS REFERRED TO AS "EQUAL" INDICATE SPACING WHICH IS EQUIDISTANT MEASURED TO THE CONTAINED WITHIN CONTRACT DOCUMENTS SHALL BE REPLACED AT NO COST TO THE OWNER, 970.SU.3473 f 303.308.1375 f COMPLY WIâ„¢ PERMIT REQUIREMENTS, LOCAL, STATE AND FEDERAL. JURISDICTIONS AND GOVERNING CENTERLINES. BODIES/AGENCIES RULES AND REGULATIONS AND LAND USE APPROVAL CONDITIONS AT ALL TIMES. 3. PROVIDE MATCHING SIZES AND FORMS FOR EACH PLANT OF THE SAME SPECIES UNLESS OTHERWISE 4. MEASUREMENTS ARE TO THE FINISHED FACE OF BUILDINGS, WALLS, OR OTHER FIXED SITE INDICATED. 4. WORK PERFORMED WITHOUT APPROVAL OF LOCAL, STATE AND FEDERAL JURISDICTIONS AND GOVERNING IMPROVEMENTS. DIMENSIONS TO CENTERLINES ARE IDENTIFIED AS SUCH. BODIES/AGENCIES AND/OR NOT IN COMPLIANCE WITH SPECIFICATIONS AND/OR DRAWINGS IS SUBJECT 4. CONTRACTOR TO VERIFY ALL QUANTITIES. IN CASE OF DISCREPANCIES, GRAPHICALLY SHOWN TO REMOVAL AT CONTRACTOR'S EXPENSE. 5. INSTALL_ INTERSECTING ELEMENTS AT 90-DEGREE ANGLES, UNLESS OTHERWISE INDICATED. MAINTAIN QUANTITIES SHALL TAKE PRECEDENCE. HORIZONTAL ALIGNMENT OF ADJACENT ELEMENTS AS INDICATED IN CONTRACT- DOCUMENTS. 5. ALL WORK SHALL CONFORM TO THE APPROPRIATE AGENCIES. CONTRACTOR SHALL- VERIFY LOCATION OF 5, ALL MATERIALS USED SHALL CONFORM TO THI GUIDELINES ESTABLISHED BY THE CURRENT AMERICAN ALL EXISTING UTILITIES, LINES AND STRUCTURES PRIOR TO EXCAVATION OR TRENCHING. DAMAGE 6. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL PROVIDE A FULL-SCALE MOCKUP AND RECEIVE APPROVAL FROM THE LANDSCAPE STANDARDS FOR NURSERY STOCK, PUBLISHED BY THE AMERICAN ASSOCIATION OF NURSERYMEN. SHALL BE REPAIRED BY THE CONTRACTOR AT NO COST TO THE OWNER. THE LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT ARCHITECT FOR ALL SYSTEMS BEFORE BEGINNING CONSTRUCTION OF PAVEMENT. Consultants ASSUMES NO RESPONSIBILITY FOR UTILITIES OR 5TRUCTURES NOT SHOWN ON THE DUWINGS. 6. ALL PLANT MATERIAL SHALL BE INSTALLED PLUMB AND PER THE SPECIFICATIONS CONTAINED WITHIN THE CONTRACTOR IS TO VERIFY THE EXACT LOCATION OF UTILITIES PRIOR TO CON5TRUCTION AND NOTIFY 7. EXPANSION JOINTS SHALL BE PROVIDED WHERE FLATWORK MEETS VERTICAL 5TRUCTURES, SUCH AS CONTRACT DOCUMENTS. ANY NECESSARY STAKING AND/OR OTHER SUPPORTS MATERIALS/METÂ·HODS THE LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT OF ANY DISCREPANCIES. CONTRACTOR SHALL USE EXTREME CAUTION WHEN WALLS, CURSE STEPS, AND OTHER HARDSCAPE ELEMENTS. EXPANSION JOINTS SHALL ALSO BE SHALL BE SUBMITTED TO THE LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT FOR REVIEW AND APPROVAL PRIOR TO 1 WORKING OVER OR NEAR EXISTING GAS AND ELECTRICAL LINES. PROVIDED AT MATERIAL CHANGES. EXPANSION JOINT MATERIALS/METHODS SHALL BE SUBMITTED TO INSTALLATION. 6. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR RESETTING ALL LAND MONUMENTS DISRUPTED BY THE LANDSCAPE ARCHITEC FOR REVIEW AND APPROVAL PRIOR TO INSTALLATION. 7. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL PRUNE EXISTING AND/OR NEW TREES ONLY PER LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT bluegreen CONSTRUCTION ACTIVmES OR NEGLIGENCE ON THE PART OF â„¢E CONTRACTOR. RESETS SHALL BE 8. CONTROL JOINTS SHOULD BE SPACED NO GREATER THAN TEN (10) LINEAR FEET MAXIMUM, UNLESS DIRECTION. 300 s spring st, suite 202 aspen, co 81611 PERFORMED UNDER THE SUPERVISION OF A REGISTERED LAND SURVEYOR AND MONUMENT RECORDS OTHERWISE SPECIFIED. EXPANSION JOINTS SHOULD BE SPACED NO GREATER â„¢AN FORTY (40) LINEAR 970.429.7499 0 MUST BE FILED AS REQUIRED BY STATUTE FOR ALL MONUMENTS. FEET MAXIMUM, UNLESS OTHERWISE SPECIFIED. CONTUCTOR SHALL ADVISE ON OTHER JOINTS AS 8. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL STAKE THE LOCATIONS OF ALL TREES AND 8&8 SHRUBS FOR LANDSCAPE 970.429.9499 r NEEDED TO MINIMIZE CRACKING. THIS INFORMATION SHALL BE SUBMITTED TO THE LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT RBIEW AND APP~4 PRIOR E INSTAUA17(N. fali,n.corn 7. ALL CONSTRUCTION AND MATERIALS NOT SPECIFICALLY ADDRESSED IN THE CONTRACT DOCUMENTS OR ARCHITECT FOR REVIEW AND APPROVAL PRIOR TO INSTALLATION. SPECIFICATIONS SHALL BE IN ACCORDANCE WIâ„¢ LOCAL, STATE AND FEDERAL JURISDICTIONS AND 9. ALL ROOT-WRAPPING MATERIALS THAT ARE NOT BIO-DEGRADABLE SHALL BE REMOVED FROM THE ROOT GOVERNING BODIES/AGENCIES STANDARDS. 9. CONTROL JOINTS SHALL BE PROVIDED AS SPECIFIED IN â„¢E CONTRACT DOCUMENTS. CONTROL JOINT BALL ROOT BALLS SHALL BE FREE OF WEEDS. MATERIALS, METHODS AND RECOMMENDATIONS ON ADDrTIONAL CONTROL JOINTS TO MINIMIZE 8. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL TAKE ALL. PRECAUTIONARY MEASURES NECESSARY TO PROTECT EXISTING CRACKING SHALL BE SUBMITTED TO THE LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT FOR REVIEW AND APPROVAL 10. SPECIFIED PLANT MATERIAL SIZES SHALL BE C:ONSIDERED MINIMUM SIZES. IMPROVEMENTS FROM DAMAGE AND ALL SUCH IMPROVEMENTS AND STRUCTURES DAMAGED BY THE CONTRACTOR'S OPERATIONS SHALL BE REPAIRED OR RECONSTRUCTED SATISFACTORY TO THE 10. AU STEPS SHALL HAVE FOURTEEN (14) INCH TREADS AND SIX (6) INCH RISERS, UNLESS OTHERWISE 11. FINISH GRADE OF PLANTING BEDS SHALL BE ONE (1) INCH BELOW ADJACENT FLATWORK, UNLESS LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT AT THE CONTRACTOR'S EXPENSE. SPECIFIED. SPECIFIED OTHERWISE. Issue: 9. ALL BARRICADING AND TEMPORARY TRAFFIC CONTROL DEVICES OR METHODS USED DURING 11. HOLD TOP OF WALLS AND FENCES LEVEL, UNLESS OTHERWISE SPECIFIED. 12. MULCH OR PLANTING BED DRESSING SHAU BE PLACED IN ALL PLANTING AREAS AS SPECIFIED. MULCH OR 07.14.15 CONSTRUCTION SHALL BE IN ACCORDANCE WITH LOCAL, STATE AND FEDERAL JURISDICTIONS AND PLANTING BED DRESSING SHALL NOT BE PLACED WITHIN SIX (6) INCHES OF TREE TRUNKS. MULCHING PLANNED DEVELOPMENT GOVERNING BODIES/AGENCIES STANDARDS. PROVIDE ADEQUATE TIME FOR REVIEW AND APPROVAL BY 12. CONTRACTOR SHALL NOT INSTALL WORK LOCATED ON TOP OF ARCHTTECTURAL STRUCTURES WITHOUT SHOULD BE REPEATED ANNUALLY DURING THE AUTUMN TO A THREE (3) INCH DEFTH. DETAILED REVIEW APPUCATION THE ABOVE JURISDICTIONS PRIOR TO COMMENCEMENT. FIRST REVIEWING ARCHITECTURAL DRAWINGS. 13. ALL PLANT MATERIAL SHOULD RECEIVE AN ORGANIC FERTILIZER IN LIMITED APPLICATION FOLLOWING I 10 THE LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT IS NOT RESPONSIBLE FOR THE CONSTRUCTION MEANS, METHODS, 13. SAMPLES OF SPECIFIED MATERIALS SHALL BE SUBMITTED TO THE LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT FOR REVIEW INSTALLATION. TYPE AND APPLICATION RATE AND METHOD OF APPLICATION TO BE SPECIFIED BY THE TECHNIQUES, SEQUENCES UTIUZED OR FOR SAFETY PRECAUTIONS OR PROBLEMS IN CONNECTION WITH AND APPROVAL PRIOR TO ORDERING FOR JOB. CONTRACTOR AND APPROVED BY THE LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT. THE WORK. THE LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT WILL NOT BE RESPONSIBLE FOR THE CONTRACTOR'S FAILURE TO CARRY OUT THE WORK IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE CONTRACT DOCUMENTS. CONTRACT DOCUMENTS 14. EXCESS FERTIUZER SHALL BE DISPOSED OF PROPERLY OFF-SITE. IT SHALL NOT BE DISPOSED OF IN INCLUDE THE CONSTRUCTION DOCUMENT DRAWING SET/TECHNICAL SPECIFICATIONS MANUAL/LASIS. STORM DRAINS AND/OR DRYWELLS. 11. CONTRACTOR TO VERIFY ALL QUANTITIES. IN CASE OF ANY DISCREPANCIES, GRAPHICALLY SHOWN 15. STOCKPILED PLANT MATERIAL TO BE PLACED IN THE SHADE AND PROPERLY HAND-WATERED UNTIL MATERIAL QUANTITIES SHAU TAKE PRECEDENCE. PLANTED. ' 12. A SYSTEM OF DIAGRAMMAT1C SYMBOLS, HATCHES AND NOTATIONS IS USED IN THESE DRAWINGS. GRADING NOTES 16 MINI-NUGGET TYPE DECORATIVE BARK MULCH WILL BE USED TO RETURN NUTRIENTS TO THE SOIL, REVIEW NOTATIONS CAREFULLY, NOTIFY LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT AND REQUEST CLARIFICATION OF ANY REDUCE MAINTENANCE AND MINIMIZE EVAPORATION FOR AREAS APPROXIMATE TO THE RESIDENCE. UNCLE,AR NOTATION OR DISCREPANCY PRIOR TO COMMENCING WORK. LARGER SHREDDED BARK MULCH WIU BE USED FOR 5TEEP AREAS SO SLOUGHING IS LESS LIKELY TO 1. VERIFY EXI5TING ELEVATIONS PRIOR TO STARTING WORK. NOTIFY LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT OF ANY OCCUR. DISCREPANCIES. EXISTING AND PROPOSED GRADES ARE BASED ON SURVEY DOCUMENTS PREPARED BY 13. PROVIDE SLEEVES AS REQUIRED FOR DRAINAGE, IRRIGATION AND ELECTRICAL LINES. IRRIGATION AND ELECTRICAL SLEEVES AND SUBSURFACE DRAINAGE 5Y5TEMS SHALL BE CONSTRUCTED PRIOR TO PAVING SURVEYOR. 17. PRESERVE & PROTECT ALL EXISTING VEGETATION INDICATED TO REMAIN AT ALL TIMES. AND LANDSCAPE WORK. UTILITY SLEEVES ARE REQUIRED IN ALL PLANT BEDS ISOLATED BY PAVEMENT OR ANY OTHER STRUCTURES. 2. CONTRACTOR SHALL VERIFY THE PLACEMENT OF FLATWORK PENETRATIONS TO ENSURE COORDINATION 18. ALL VEGETATION PROPOSED FOR OUTSIDE THE BUILDING ENVELOPE TO BE NATIVE UNLESS OTHERWISE OF SURFACE FIXTURES, SUCH AS DRAINS AND LIGHTS. NOTIFY GENERAL CONTRACTOR AND LANDSCAPE NOTED. PLANTING THAT OCCURS OUTSIDE THE BUILDING ENVELOPE IS FOR RESTORATION PURPOSES 14. SPECIAL CONSIDERATION IS GIVEN TO THE DESIGN AND INTENDED RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN ARCHITECT OF DISCREPANCIES PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION OF FLATWORK. ONLY OR IS SPECIFIC TO UTILITIES RESTORATION. ARCHITECTURE, PLANTING AREAS AND PAVING SYSTEMS. PAVEMENT JOINTING, PAVERS, STONE, FINISHES AND GRADES HAVE BEEN STRICTLY COORDINATED IN THE CONTRACT DOCUMENTS. 3. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL REFER TO THE ARCHITECTURAL DPAWINGS TO VERIFY FINISHED FLOOR 19. SIX (6) INCH PLANT MIX SHALL BE PROVIDED FOR ALL LAWN, TURF, AND NATIVE PLANTING ZONES. 18 CONSTRUCTION OF THESE SYSTEMS SHALL BE STRICTLY COORDINATED. ELEVATIONS. THE GENERAL CONTRACTOR AND LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT SHALL BE NOTIFIED IF THERE ARE INCH PLANT MIX SHALL BE PROVIDED FOR ALL PERENNIAL PLANTING BEDS UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED. ANY DISCREPANCIES PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION. 15. VEHICLES, EQUIPMENT, AND/OR MATERIALS SHALL NOT BE PARKED OR STORED IN AREAS OF EXISTING VEGETATION, INCLUDING WITHIN THE DRIPLINE OF EXISTING TREES TO REMAIN. 4. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL REFER TO THE MECHANICAL DRAWINGS TO VERIFY DRAIN LOCATIONS OVER STRUCTURE. THE GENERAL CONTRACTOR AND LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT SHALL BE NOTIFIED OF ANY 16. DISCREPANCIES PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION. SOIL EROSION CONTROL NOTES LANDSCAPE MATERIALS TO BE STORED UNDER SECURED TARPS OR SHEETING TO PROTECT AGAINST WIND, RAIN, AND SNOW DAMAGE. 5. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL REFER TO THE CIVIL ENGINEERING DRAWINGS TO VERIFY UTILITY AND OTHER 1. PRIOR TO BEGINNING ANY EARTH CHANGE, THE CONTRACTOR SHALL- INSTALL AND MAINTAIN ALL SESC 17. CONSTRUCTION WASTE-INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO: PLANT MATERIAL, BUILDING MATERIALS, DRAIN LOCATIONS. THE GENERAL CONTRACTOR AND LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT SHALL BE NOTIFIED OF ANY MEASURES AS SHOWN ON THE CONTRACT DOCUMENTS AND AS REQUIRED BY ANY GOVERNING AGENCIES. DEMOLISHED MATERIALS, PACKAGING, LEFTOVER PAINT AND CONCRETE SLURRY-SHOULD BE PROPERLY DISCREPANCIES PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION. REUSED, RECYCLED, DISPOSED OF LEGALLY OFF-SITE OR IN DESIGNATED WASH-OUT AREAS DETERMINED 2. ALL SESC MEASURES TO BE MAINTAINED DAILY. BY THE GENERAL CONTRACTOR. 6. PROPOSED Elm/ATIONS INDICATED ON DRAWINGS ARE FINISHED GRADE ELEVATIONS. THE i CONTRACTOR SHALL DIRECT ROUGH GRADE WORK TO ALLOW FOR SUFFICIENT TOPSOIL AND OTHER 3. THE CONTUCTOR TO CONDUCT ALL EXCAVATION, FILLING, GRADING, AND CLEANUP OPERATIONS IN A FINISHED CONDITIONS AS DESCRIBED IN THE CONTRACT DOCUMENTS. 18. RECYCLING AND TMSH BINS TO BE PROVIDED ON SITE. SEPARATE SINS FOR CARDBOARD, CO-MINGLED, MANNER SUCH THAT SEDIMENT, GENERATED Bv WIND OR WATER IS NOT DISCHARGED INTO ANY STORM AND OTHER RECYCLABLE/REUSABLE MATERIALS IDENTIFIED BY THE LOCAL JURISDICTION SHALL BE SEWER, DRAINAGE DITCH, RIVER, LAKE, AIR, CR UNDERGROUND UTILITY SYSTEM. 5TAGE WORK To SKY HOTEL MAINTAINED, ALL SINS TO BE WILDUFE-PROOF. 7. ALL FINISHED GRADES SHALL MEET AND BLEND SMOOTHLY WITH EXISTING GRADES AT THE PROJECT MINIMIZE THE AREA OF EXPOSED SOIL, THERESY REDUCING THE OPPORTUNITY FOR SOIL EROSION. , LIMIT. 19. ON-SITE FUEL STORAGE FOR CONSTRUCTION EQUIPMENT IS DISCOURAGED. CONSTRUCTION EQUIPMENT- 4. WATER FROM TRENCHES AND OTHER EXCAVATION TO BE PUMPED INTO A FILTRATION BAG TO REMOVE 8. ALL FINISHED GRADES SHALL BE WITHOUT LOW SPOTS OR POCKETS. CONTRACTOR SHAU SET FLOW USED ON SITE TO BE CHECKED REGULARLY TO ASSURE CONTAMINATION CONCERNS FROM OILS AND SEDIMENTS FROM THE WATER. GREASES ARE ELIMINATED. NO TOXIC MATERIALS SHALL BE STORED ON-SITE. UNES ACCURATELY AND PROVIDE A MINIMUM OF TWO (2) PERCENT OR MAXIMUM OF FIFTY (50) PERCENT, UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED. 5. NORTH AMERICAN GREEN SC-150 OR EQUIVALENT EROSION CONTROL FABRIC IS REQUIRED ON ALL 20. GENERAL CONTRACTOR TO KEEP ALL ITEMS IMPLEMENTED BY LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT IN PROPER DISTURBED SLOPES GREATER â„¢AN 3: 1 UNTIL PROJECT AREA IS REVEGETATED PER THE PLANTING PLAN. 709 E. DURANT AVENUE WORKING ORDER THROUGHOUT THE DURATION OF â„¢E PROJECT. 9. ALL FINISHED GRADES SHAU PRESENT SMOOTH TRANSITIONS BETWEEN TOES AND TOPS OF SLOPES. ASPEN, CO 81611 6. PROVIDE POSITIVE DRAINAGE AWAY FROM ALL STRUCTURES. 21. THE CON5TRUCTION SITE TO BE INSPECTED ON A MONTHLY BASIS BY LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT AND/OR 10. THE MAXIMUM SLOPE OF SOD TO BE 3: 1 IN AREAS DESIGNATED AS " LAWN," UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED. CIVIL ENGINEER TO ASSURE THAT THE SILT FENCE AND MUD TRACKING PAD ARE PROPERLY IN PLACE AND 7. CONTRACTOR TO PROVIDE ONSITE WATERING TO REDUCE FLIGmVE DUST LEAVING THE SITE DURING , FUNCTIONING AS DESIGNED. 11. ALL MANHOLES, VALVE BOXES, UTILITY BOXES AND PEDESTALS, AND OTHER APPURTENANCES SHALL BE CONSTRUCTION. ADJUSTED TO FINISH GRADE IN ACCORDANCE WrTH THE LOCAL, STATE AND FEDERAL JURISDICTIONS 22. GREEN BUILDING PRACTICES SHALL BE EMPLOYED TO â„¢E EXTENT FEASIBLE, SUCH PRACTICES INCLUDE: 8. SOIL EROSION CONTROL MEASURES TO BE PROVIDED FOR ALL EXI5TING AND PROPOSED DRAINAGE AND GOVERNING BODIES/AGENCIES OR UTILITY RULES AND REGULATIONS, UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED. CARPOOLING/VANPOOLING TO JOB SITE, MINIMIZING MATERIALS PACKING BEFORE ARRIVAL TO JOB SITE, STRUCTURES WITHIN THE PROJECT LIMITS. 12. SOIL COMPACTION BENEATH PAVEMENTS, STEPS, WALLS AND UGHT FOUNDATIONS SHALL BE 95% REDUCING MATERIAL/RESOURCE INEFFICIENCIES BY COORDINA,11NG WORK, PROCTOR DENSITY MINIMUM, UNLESS OTHERWISE SPECIFIED. 9. CONSTRUCTION STAGING AND PHASING SHALL OCCUR, WHERE APPLICABLE, TO MINIMIZE SOIL 23. IF SITE WORK IS DELAYED DUE TO ANY CIRCUMSTANCE; THE CONTRACTOR SHALL PROTECT PREPARED DISTURBANCE TIME. PLANT BEDS FROM EROSION. 13. GRADING AND EXCAVATION WORK SHALL BE COMPLETED DURING DRY AND NON-FREEZING WEATHER CONDITIONS. 10. BEST MANAGEMENT PRACTICES (BMFs) SHALL BE ADJUSTED AS NEEDED TO MEET ANY OTHER UNFORESEEN 24. EXISTING TREES TO BE PRESERVED SHALL BEAR SAME RELATIONSHIP TO FINISHED GRADE AS â„¢EY BEAR CONDnlONS. TO PRE-CONSTRUCTION GRADE. 14. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL REMOVE AND STOCKPILE TOPSOIL FOR REUSE ON-SITE. SOIL SHALL BE SCREENED TO REMOVE ROCKS AND BOULDERS. 11. THE GENERAL CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FOR INSTALLING A MUD TRACKING PAD/WASHING PAD AT 25. EXISTING TREES TO BE PRESERVED SHALL BE PROTECTED WITH STURDY, WEATHERPROOF FENCING AT A THE CONSTRUCnON ENTRANCES TO MINIMIZE MUD DETACHMENT FROM TRUCK TIRES, 1-1/2 INCH MINIMUM FOUR (4) FEET HEIGHT INSTALLED NO CLOSER 70 THE TREE TRUNK THAN ITS DRIPLINE. THIS 15. IF STRUCTURAL SOIL IS FOUND ON-SITE, THE CONTRACTOR SHALL REUSE. SCREENED ROCK TO BE PLACED ON MIRAFI 140-N FILTER FABRIC. ADDmONAL CLEAN GRAVEL TO BE TREE PROTECTION ZONES FREE OF WEEDS AND TRASH. 16. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL PREVENT SOIL LOSS TO WIND AND WATER EROSION. PROJECT NO: FENCE SHAU BE MAINTAINED IN WORKING ORDER DURING ALL- PHASES OF CONSTRUCTION. MAINTAIN ADDED THROUGHOUT THE DURATION OF CONSTRUCTION AS NEEDED. 12. CONTUCTOR SHALL ABIDE BY THE LOCAL, STATE AND FEDERAL JURISDICTIONS AND GOVERNING 21406 17 THE CONTRACTOR SHALL PROVIDE POSITIVE DRAINAGE AWAY FROM ALL STRUCTURES. BODIES/AGENCIES CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT PLAN REQUIREMENTS. DWG FILEÂ· 26. NO WORK SHALL BE CONDUCTED WITHIN THE DRIPUNE, UNLESS REVIEWED AND APPROVED BY THE BG L SERIES SKY HOTEL.dwg LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT. All WORK APPROVED WrTHIN THE DRIPUNE SHALL BE COMPLETED BY HAND. 18. THE GENERAL CONTUCTOR SHALL INSTALL & MAINTAIN TEMPOURY DRAINAGE DEVICES DURING 13. RESEED AS INDICATED IN SEEDING NOTES. PROTECT ROOT SYSTEMS FROM PONDING, ERODING, OR EXCESSIVE WETTING. CONSTRUCTION. SHEET TITLE 27 THE PROJECT LIMIT OF CONSTRUCTION AND ALL EXISTING VEGETATION TO REMAIN IS TO BE CLEARLY THE CONTRACTOR SHALL VERIFY ALL CONTROL POINTS, FINISH FLOOR ELEVATIONS & PROPOSED SPOT NOTES 19. DEFINED BY STURDY, WEATHERPROOF FENCING AT A MINIMUM OF FOUR (4) FEET HIGH. Elm/ATIONS WITH LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT PRIOR TO FORMWORK INSTALLATION. 28. WATERPROOFING OF SUBGRADE AND OTHER ARCHITECTURAL SPACES BELOW AND/OR ADJACENT TO IMPROVEMENTS DESIGNED BY THE LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT IS TO BE ADEQUATELY DESIGNED AND 1 DETAILED BY OTHERS TO PERMANENTLY REPEL ALL WATER SOURCES INCLUDING, BUT NOT UNITED TO: PRECIPITATION, SNOW MELT, STORM WATER RUNOFF, GROUND WATER, IRRIGATION, ROOF RUNOFF, SCALE. Â£ GROUND WATER, AND PLUMBING LEAKS. 29. STRUCTURAL DESIGN TO SUPPORT IMPROVEMENTS DESIGNED BY THE LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT AND LOO1 LOCATED ABOVE, BELOW, AND/OR ADJACENT TO SUBGRADE AND OTHER ARCHITECTURAL SPACES IS â„¢E RESPONSIBILITY OF THE STRUCTURAL ENGINEER. THE STRUCTURAL DESIGN SHOULD 8E ADEQUATELY 1 DESIGNED TO SUPPORT ALL POSSIBLE LOADS INCLUDING, BUT NOT LIMITED TO: BACKFILL, COMPACTION, *-rÂ¤, ---i. Â£**T-eD C* n- 0=u- I PLANTINGS, HARDSCAPES. RETAINING AND FREESTANDING SITE WALLS, AND CONSTRUCTION n- -r-~Gu.-*aÂ¤lu-.114â€¢C,â€¢TE.-- 4 MATERIALS/EQUIPMENT/ACTIVITY. ot=* IK~P.~TC~T~---1~~~~7'*aFrT- rowland+broughton SEEDING NOTES IRRIGATION NOTES SITEWORK ABBREVIATIONS arct,Recture / urban dedgn l interior demgn 234 e hopkins ave 1830 blake st ste 200 aspen, co 81611 denver, co 80202 1. ALL NEWLY REGRADED SLOPES TO BE REVEGETATED IN THE FOLLOWING MANNER: 1. IRRIGATION PLAN IS CONCEPTUAL; FURTHER DESIGN TO BE COMPLETED BY IRRIGATION APPROX APPROXIMATE MIN MINIMUM 970.544.9006 0 303.308.1373 0 CONTRACTOR/DESIGNER. ARCH ARCHITECT MISC MISCELLANEOUS 970.544.3473 1 303.300.1375 f 2, MINIMUM SIX (6) INCHES OF TOPSOIL TO BE PLACED IN AREAS TO RECEIVE SEED; TOPSOIL TO BE GOOD AVG AVERAGE MTD MOUNTED CLEAN ORGANIC SOIL (FREE OF WEEDS AND ROCKS), 2. IRRIGATION SYSTEM SHALL BE DESIGNED TO CONSERVE WATER TO â„¢E EXTENT POSSIBLE THROUGH THE B&B BALLED AND BURLAP MTL METAL USE OF EFFICIENT HEADS, MICROCLIMATE-SPECIFIC ZONES AND A WEATHER AND MOI5TURE BC BOTTOM OF CURB NIC NOT IN CONTRACT 3. SEED MIXTURES AND FERTILIZER SHALL BE APPLIED PER THE GOVERNING JURISDICTIONS' MONITORING CONTROL STARON. BF BOTTOM OF FOOTING NO NUMBER i , REQUIREMENTS, BM BENCHMARK NOM NOMINAL 3. ALL NEW TREES AND SHRUBS TO RECEIVE DRIP-TYPE IRRIGATION. BW BOTTOM OF WALL NTS NOT TO SCALE 4. ALL SEED MUST BE CERTIFIED WEED FREE. NO SEED CAN CONTAIN ANY SPECIES ON THE CITY, COUNTY BRG BEARING OC ON CENTER OR STATE NOXIOUS WEED LISTS. SEED MIXES SHALL HAVE THE CERTIFIED SEED BLUE TAG OR SOURCE 4. ALL REVEGETATED AREAS TO RECEIVE SPRAY-TYPE IRRIGATION FOR FIRST TWO GROWING SEASONS CL CENTERLINE OD OUTSIDE DIAMETER IDENTIFIED SEED (YELLOW TAG). ONLY SEED WITH A COMPLETE ANALYSIS LABEL ON THE BAG AND A MINIMUM. CAL CALIPER OPP OPPOSITE CURRENT GERMINATION TEST CONDUCTED BY AN ACCREDITED LABORATORY WILL BE ACCEPTED. CAP CAPACITY PA PLANTINGAREA Consultalts 5. ALL PERENNIAL BEDS TO RECEIVE SPRAY-TYPE IRRIGATION. CHAM CHAMFER PAR PAULLEL 5. SEEDING SHALL- OCCUR IN THE EARLY SPRING AND LATE FAU; SEEDING SHALL NOT BE DONE WHEN THE CIP CAST IN PLACE POB POINT OF BEGINNING GROUND IS FROZEN. FOR WARM SEASON SPECIES, SEEDING IN LATE SPRING OR EARLY SUMMER IS MORE 6. ALL SPRAY TYPE IRRIGATION TO BE DIRECTED AWAY FROM STRUCTURES. C] CONTROL JOINT POC POINT OF CURVATURE UKELY TO ACCOMPANY TEMPERATURES WARM ENOUGH TO SUPPORT GERMINATION. SEED THE SITE AS CLR CLEARANCE PERF PERFORATED SOON AS FINAL GRADING AND TOPSOIL PLACEMENT HAVE OCCURRED TO MINIMIZE EROSION AND WEED 7. INSTALL SPRAY HEADS ALONG SIDEWALKS ON POP-UP RISERS. CO CLEAN OUT PED PEDESTRIAN ESTABUSHMENT ON THE PROJECT. DURING PERIODS OF TIME WHEN SEEDING CANNOT BE COMP COMPACTED PI POINT OF INTERSECTION bluegreen ACCOMPLISHED, SOILS SHALL NOT REMAIN UNPROTECTED. 8. LOCATE HEADS SO THEY ARE PROTECTED FROM TRAVEL AND DO NOT CAUSE WATER TO FALL ON PAVED, CONC CONCRETE PL PROPERTY LINE 300 s sp/ng st,suite 202 MASONRY, OR OTHER ARCHITECTURAL SURFACES. CONSTR CONSTRUCTION FT POINT, POINT OF TANGENCY aspen, co 81611 970.429.7499 0 6. UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED, HAND BROADCAST OF SEED SHALL BE USED ON ALL SLOPES, INCLUDING CONT CONTINUOUS PVC POLYVINYL CHLORIDE 970.429.9499 f THOSE THAT ARE 5TEEP (GREATER â„¢AN 3:1),EXTREMELY ROCKY, REMOTE OR INACCESSIBLE. SEED 9. ADJUST HEAD LOCATION IF SPRAY IS DETRIMENTAL TO OR BLOCKED BY TREE, SHRUB, OR STRUCTURE, CONTR CONTRACTOR PVMT PAVEMENT ~ *aspen com UTE WILL VARY PER SEED MIXTURE SPECIFIED. BROADCAST SEEDING REQUIRES DOUBLE OR TRIPLE THE MAINTAINING EVEN COVERAGE OF PLANTING AREAS. CU CUBIC PVR PAVER SEEDING RATE OF DRIU SEEDING, AND CALIBRATION OF SEEDING RATES IS LESS PRECISE THAN WITH CF CUBIC FEET QNTY QUANTITY DRILL SEEDING. SOILS TO BE RAKED OR HARROWED TO ELIMINATE CRUSTING BEFORE ACCEPTING 10. GENERAL CONTRACTOR TO COORDINATE SIZE AND LOCATION OF SLAB PENETUTIONS FOR IRRIGATION DBL DOUBLE R RADIUS BROADCAST SEED. CARE SHALL BE TAKEN TO ENSURE UNIFORM COVEUGE (EVEN SEED APPLICATION EQUIPMENT WITH MECHANICAL CONTRACTORS. DF DIRECTION OF FLOW RECEP RECEPTACLE RATE5) OVER THE AREA, AND SEEDING SHALL NOT OCCUR DURING WINDY WEATHER. DEG DEGREE REF REFERENCE 11. INSTALL MAIN LINES TO SLOPE AT 1% MINIMUM TO MANUAL DRAIN VALVES LOCATED AT LOW POINTS OF DEMO DEMOUSH, DEMOLrTION REINF REINFORCED 7. HAND UKE SEED INTO TOPSOIL NO MORE THAN 3/4 INCH DEEP TO COVER. SOIL / SEED CONTACT IS MAIN SYSTEM. DTL DETAIL REM REMOVE CRITICAL FOR GROWTH. DWG DRAWING REQD REQUIRED 18Sue: 12. INSTALL 3/4 INCH POLYETHYLENE LATERAL LINES TO SLOPE AT 1% MINIMUM TO AUTOMATIC DRAIN EA EACH REV REVISION, REVISED 8. DRILL SEEDING, WHEN INDICATED ON DRAWINGS, MAY BE APPROVED BY LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT ON VALVES LOCATED AT LOW POINTS OF LATERAL SYSTEMS. El EXPANSION JOINT ROW RIGHT OF WAY 07.14.15 SLOPES OF 3:1 OR FLATTER, BUT NOT IN AREAS OF EXTREMELY ROCKY SOILS. SEED TO A DEFâ„¢ OF 1/4 EL ELEVATION SAN SANrTARY PLANNED DEVELOPMENT TO 1/2 INCH. DRILL TUBE SPACING SHOULD BE SIX (6) TO SEVEN (7) INCHES. SEEDING SHOULD BE 13. TRENCHES TO BE OF SUFFICIENT DEPTH TO PROVIDE 18 INCHES OF COVER OVER LATERAL LINES, El-EC ELECTRICAL SCH SCHEDULE DETAILED REVIEW APPLICATION CONDUCTED ALONG THE SLOPE'S CONTOUR TO AVOID EROSION FROM WATER FLOWING DOWN DRILL SLEEVED LINES SHALL HAVE A MINIMUM COVER OF 24 INCHES. TRENCHES ARE TO BE BACKFILLED WITH ENG ENGINEER SD STORM DRAIN FURROWS. SEEDING RATE TO BE SIX (6) TO TEN (10) PURE UVE SEED LBS PER ACRE. MATERIAL FREE OF ROCKS GREATER THAN 3/4 INCHES IN DIAMETER. EQ EQUAL SEC SECTION EQUIP EQUIPMENT SF SQUARE FOOT (FEET) 9. HYDROSEEDING, WHEN INDICATED ON DRAWINGS, SHALL BE SPRAYED ON A ROUGHENED SLOPE USING A 14. IN5TALL BACKFLOW PREVENTOR(S) IN COORDINATION WITF GENERAL CONTRACTOR. BACKFLOW EST E5TIMATE SHT SHEET HYDROSEEDING MACHINE AND SHALL BE USED TO REACH AREAS THAT ARE INACCESSIBLE BY BROADCAST PREVENTORS SHALL BE INSTALLED PLUMB AND SQUARE WIT-I ADJACENT PAVEMENT EDGES OR EW EACH WAY SIM SIMILAR METHODS. USE TO BE LIMITED TO STEEP (GREATER THAN 3:1), INACCESSIBLE SLOPES IN AREAS WrTH 5TRUCTURES. COLOR, BLACK. EXIST EXISTING SNT SEALANT ADEQUATE AND DEPENDABLE MOISTURE DURING THE GROWING SEASON. HYDROMULCHING MUST OCCUR EXP EXPANSION, EXPOSED SPECS SPECIFICATIONS AS A SEPARATE PROCESS AFrER HYDROSEEDING. DO NOT MIX SEED AND MULCH TOGETHER IN ONE 15. CONTROL VALVE BOX AND HEAD BOX LOCATIONS TO BE APPROVED BY LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT PRIOR TO FFE FINISH FLOOR ELEVATION SQ SQUARE WATER APPLICATION PROCESS AS THIS WILL PREVENT SEEDS FROM COMING INTO CONTACT WITH THE INSTALLATION. COLOR, BLACK. FG FINISHED GRADE STA STATION SOIL. FIN FINISH STD STANDARD 16. THE FINAL LOCATION AND EXACT PosmONING OF THE AUTOMATIC CONTROLLER SHALL BE APPROVED BY FL FLOW UNE STL 5TEEL 10, THE SITE MUST BE MULCHED WITH WEED-FREE MULCH (HAY OR HYDROMULCH) AFTER SEEDING. THE OWNER'S AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE OR GENERAL CONTRACTOR PRIOR TO INSTALLATION. FOC FACE OF CONCRETE 5TRL STRUCTURAL FS FINISH SURFACE SYM SYMMETRICAL 11. HAY MULCH MUST BE WEED-FREE. HAY TO BE -CRIMPED" INTO THE SOIL SURFACE BY HAND ON STEEP 17. VALVE BOXES SHALL BE INSTALLED FLUSH WITH FINISH GRADE AND ALIGN VALVE BOXES WITH ADJACENT FT FOOT T&13 TOP AND BOTTOM SLOPES. ON FLAT SURFACES A MODIFIED DISC PLOW MAY BE UTILIZED TO JAM THE HAY STEMS INTO THE PAVEMENT EDGES OR 5TRUCTURES. VALVE BOXES SHALL BE OF PLASTIC WITH BOLT DOWN LID, FTG FOOTING TC TOP OF CURB SOIL TO REDUCE SURFACE WIND SPEEDS AND SOIL DESICCATION. APPLY ATTHE UTE OF 3,000 TO GA GAUGE TF TOP OF FOOTING 4,000 LBS PER ACRE (3360-4480 KG/HA}. ADD AN ORGANIC-BASED TACKIFIER AT THE RATE OF 150 LBS 18. CONCEAL ALL IRRIGATION BOXES IN PLANTING BEDS WHERE APPLICABLE AND COVER WrI-H MULCH. GAL GALVANIZED THK THICK PER ACRE TO PREVENT EROSION. VALVE BOXES TO BE PLACED A MINIMUM OF 12 INCHES FROM AND PARALLEL TO CURBS AND WALKS. GC GENERAL CONTRACTOR TOPO TOPOGRAPHY GROUPED VALVES TO BE EQUALLY SPACED AND PAULLEL COLOR, BLACK. GEN GENERAL TS TOP OF 5TEP 12. HYDROMULCH MUST BE APPLIED SEPARATELY FOLLOWING SEED APPLICATION. DO NOT OVERSPUY AS HORIZONTAL HORIZ TP TOP OF PAVEMENT/PAVER THIS MAY RESULT IN EROSION. AN ORGANIC TACKIFIER SHAUL BE ADDED TO THE SLURRY TO ENHANCE 19. CONTRACTOR TO MAINTAIN A SET OF "AS-BUILT" DRAWINGS THROUGHOUT THE COURSE OF Â¥tp HIGH POINT TW TOP OF WALL THE DURABILITY OF THE APPLIED MULCH COVER. APPLY AT A RATE OF 3,000 LBS PER ACRE (3360 KG/HA). CONSTRUCTION, AND DELIVER THESE DRAWINGS TO OWNER'S REPRESENTATIVE & LANDSCAPE HT HEIGHT TRAS TRANSFORMER ADD AN ORGANIC-BASED TACKIFIER AT â„¢E RATE OF 150 LBS PER ACRE TO PREVENT EROSION, INV INVERT ELEVATION TYP TYPICAL ARCHITECT UPON COMPLETION OF WORK. ID INSIDE DIAMETER TR TOP OF RAMP 20. EXCAVATIONS TO BE BACKFILLED TO 95% COMPACTION, MINIMUM. CONTRACTOR TO REPAIR SETTLED IN INCHES VAR VARIES 1-3, SEEDED AREAS SHALL BE MAINTAINED FREE OF WEEDS, â„¢US ALLOWING THE DESIRED VEGETATION TO THRIVE WITHOUT THE CROWDING TENDENCIES OF AGGRESSIVE WEEDS. TRENCHED FOR ONE YEAR AFTER COMPLETION OF WORK. CONTRACTOR TO WARRANT THAT THE SYSTEM INCL INCLUDED VERT VERTICAL WILL BE FREE FROM DEFECTS IN MATERIAL AND WORKMANSHIP FOR A PERIOD OF ONE YEAR AFTER IRR IRRIGATION VEH VEHICLE VOL VOLUME COMPLETION OF WORK. JT JOINT UN UNEAR w/ WITH 21. EXERCISE EXTREME CARE IN EXCAVATING AND WORKING NEAR EXISTING UTILITIES AND IN EXISTING LAND LANDSCAPE W/0 WITHOUT TREE ROOT ZONES. VERIFY THE LOCATION AND CONDITION OF ALL UTILFIES AND BE RESPONSIBLE FOR LP LOW POINT wr WEIGHT DAMAGE TO ALL UTILITIES, DAMAGE CAUSED BY OR DURIN(; THE PERFORMANCE OF WORK TO BE LT UGHT WWF WELDED WIRE FABRIC REPAIRED AT NO ADDITIONAL COST TO THE OWNER. FIELD ADJUST SPRINKLER LOCATIONS SO AS TO MATL MATERIAL YD YARD AVOID CONFLICTS WrTH UTILITIES (FIRE HYDRANTS, TRANSFORMERS, ETC.). MAX MAXIMUM MEMB MEMBRANE 22. FLUSH AND ADJUST SPRINKLER HEADS FOR OPTIMUM PERFORMANCE. THIS SHALL INCLUDE TÂ·HROTTLING MH MANHOLE THE FLOW CONTROL AT EACH VALVE TO OBTAIN THE OPTIMIJM OPERATING PRESSURE FOR EACH SYSTEM. SKY HOTEL 23. IRRIGATION SYSTEM TO BE COMPLETELY DUINED TO PROTECT PIPE FROM BURSTING PRIOR TO FREEZING TEMPERATURES ANNUAUY. 24. PROVIDE SLEEVES AS REQUIRED FOR IRRIGATION UNES. IRRIGATION SYSTEMS SHALL BE CONSTRUCTED PRIOR TO PAVING AND LANDSCAPE WORK. 709 E. DURANT AVENUE ASPEN, CO 81611 PROJECT NO: 21406 DWG FILE: BG L SERIES SKY HOTEL,dwg SHEET TITLE NOTES SCALE: L002 3 -C- *0 lell- -râ„¢7 Cul.A-0 - T-Milf'-Ir- n~ -- ~wA,IcÂ·e=-*1.- -0 1- DURANT STREET LEGEND . EXISTING DECIDUOUS TREE \\\ arthitecturB / urban design / Interfor design rowland+broughton 234 e hopkins ave 1830 blake st, ste 200 EXISTING EVERGREEN TREE 970.544.90080 303.308.1373 0 970.544.3473f 303.308.1375 f aspen. co 81611 denver, co 80202 - ~ ~~'1 TREE TO BE REMOVED lj PROPER-Y 1~INE nA LL j I 1/4 - -w'gzuÂ·_ Consultants i.gf (091 Ll TREE DISPOSITION SCHEDULE _ # SPEC'CBH' ACEON ASPEN VALUE bluegreen 1 Â·Â·Oh 1 LI 1 4. EG REMOVE $477.28 afpen, co 81611 1 I - ml CHATEAU CHATEAU 2 7.5" DEC REMOVE $1677.94 970.429.9499 f 970.429.7499 a A 1 -1_22Â£- DUMONT CHAUMONT 3 10.9 EG REMOVE $3288.76 ~ www bluegreenamen.com 4 1' DEC REMOVE 0 300 s spriolg st, suite 202 IN 1 : Â£- q._7- 5 3.52 DEC REMOVE 0 6 2,5' DEC REMOVE 0 7 2.5- DEC REMOVE 0 8 1.5' DEC REMOVE 0 9 10.5" EG REMOVE $3288.76 Issue: 10 6. DEC REMOVE 0 07.14.15 11 6 DEC REMOVE 0 PLANNED DEVELOPMENT 12 5" DEC REMOVE 0 DETAILED REVIEW APPLICATION 13 105" M REMOVE $3288.76 14 26.5" DEC NON-EXISTING 0 Â· J L - .--1 ) m 15 24.5" DEC REMOVE 0 - DEC REMOVE 0 17 7.5" EG REMOVE 0 = 18 6" DEC REMOVE $1073.88 - - AL 1 1 1 11 - 19 22" DEC REMOVE $14437.72 0 1 4:,2.51 20 8.5" EG REMOVE 0 1 - "40 . ---- .1.4 ~ 0 D 1 1 1 21 10" EG REMOVE $2983.00 11 .ill 1 1 ] 1 22 7" EG REMOVE 0 1 ALLEY 23 10/ EG REMOVE $2983.00 24 6. EG REMOVE 0 25 9 EG REMOVE 0 Mfy< 1- 4.~.1 .12\= cm 26 19 EG REMOVE $6711.75 REMOVE 0 ili- . 29 9" DEC REMOVE 0 41 Di , -- 28 6.5" EG REMOVE 0 ' - 2 281 . 217' lili 4. De 1 ['1 DEC OFF PROPERTY NOT APPUCABLE , 30 8. DEC REMOVE 0 9., DEC OFF PROPERTY NOT APPLICABLE 32 33 7.5" EG REMOVE 0 GLORY HOLE CONDOMINIUMS 34 T EG REMOVE 0 1.2- 5.5" EG REMOVE 0 ta h I 35 2.5Â· EG REMOVE 0 1 1 36 37 5. EG REMOVE 0 1 J#< ' I r-- r- 38 4.5~ ES REMOVE 0 r -7 11 39 4.5- EG REMOVE 0 miri 40 5.5. EG REMOVE o -' i' 6- / 1,1.:i L- r-N" -----~ 41 5.5 EG REMOVE 0 - - 42 7. EG IREMOVE 0 SKY HOTEL 10.5' EG REMOVE 0 43 44 3" EG REMOVE 0 45 11" EG REMOVE 0 46 6" EG REMOVE 0 _ 47 6.55Â· m REMOVE 0 Â·.-4 . t.....t~ X-, 417 1 / 45k>fit \ PRIVATE 48 UNKNOWN EG REMOVE 7 709 E. DURANT AVENUE RESIDENCE 49 15" EG REMOVE $6711.75 ASPEN, CO 81611 - *ap..4/.17<4--- (t'@~-/I 1~,m,fâ‚¬7 l -PÂ», sh-,am ~ ,l ~mA*- -mZ"E~ 50 5.5 DEC REMOVE o 1 :1 \N 51 10" DEC REMOVE $2983.00 ,#000;10--- 1~'1 ./.pl#Lk?..L / 43 52 15.5" EG REMOVE $7166.66 0 1 '1\ , U \ 53 16" EG REMOVE $7636.48 |L TOTAL VALUE $64708.74 /4 / cut (Â«1 ' Â·027 / / r-------*------------4---*--- __-----_---------_- PROPERTY LINE i Y~ 3....4// 1 -a Z// f H NORTH PROJECT NO: 21406 . ./1196 DWG FILE BG L SERIES SKY HOTEL.dig <-7 ASPEN ALPS CONDOMINIUMS SHEET TITLE TREE MITIGATION PLAN i SCALE: o 8 16 L100 1~ PRELIMINARY Ct-,i â€žopâ€žT , Tâ€ž,-1,-ahrinÂ»1.~ - w~40.~1+041 â„¢, pR~,#. u NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION SOUT-H SPRING STREET- 5 7 DURANT STREET LEGEND DRAINAGE EASEMENT ---- PROPERTY LINE rowland+broughton PUBLIC PEDESTRIAN EASEMENT architactur~ / urban design / intenor design NOTES 234e hopidns ave 1830 blakest. â€¢te 200 aspen, co 81611 denver, co 80202 970.544.9006 0 303.308.1373 0 970.544 3473 f 303 308.1375 f 1. LAYO'JT DIMENSIONS ARE FROM THE BACK OF CURB UNLESS OTHERWISE STATED. PROPERTY LI VB L- -- -- /r 3 W Et - 1 1 i--MUJIT k g Consultants ~PW~E ~~~I~~~ AND bluegreer, ILI 1 J 300 s spring st, suite 202 970.429.9499 r 970.429.7499 0 CHATEAU aspen, cc 81611 - DUMONT www.bluegreenaspen.corn 10.8' WIDE DRAINAGE AND U r L UTILrTY EASEMENT F N r 1 4 1 i C 3 Issue: 111. - 18' WIDE PRIVATE, NON-EXCLUSIVE INGRESS/EGRESS EASEMENT FOR 07.14.15 DETAILED REVIEW APPLICATION AL 1 i CHATEAU CHAUMONT AND CHATEAU PLANNED DEVELOPMENT DUMONT VE 6' WIDE DRAINAGE AND UTILITY EASEMENT 0 1 11 -1 = 4 j =13 \ \ 3 2 4 1 6-- 1 U ; 1 11 ' 1 1 4 2 61-:1 1 E-7 1 1 1 ' 1 1 L 1 - PUBUC PEDESTRIAN EASEMENT ALLEY 1 I -T- Â· -1 1 - t L_- __-__-__--__ __ PROPER-FLINE - 2 1,11 =4 1 FI ~4 , - _ f b -r- 1 -- --- ---- -- ---0- I= ' ~ GLORY HOLE CONDOMINIUMS 1 - 1. 4 1 - T n r -- 1- F-3 . - 1 2 1 '1 --1 1.1 LU 2.-3 ---:1.-, - L_. L---= SKY HOTEL i i 709 E. DURANT AVENUE ASPEN, CO 81611 ........ -riw- I...'- J PRIVATE RESIDENCE -0/ 11-1 Z \ EXISTING ALPS PARKING - PROPERTY LINE 4- 813 IIUII NORTH PROJECT NO: 21406 DWG FILE: BG L SERIES SKY HOTEL.dwg ASPEN ALPS CONDOMINIUMS SHEETTITLE STREET LEVEL LAYOUT PLAN SCALE: o 8 16 PUBLIC PEDESTRIAN EASEMENT L200 ln, - * re,0, -ENT tâ„¢.A-0 C* r- DOCU,C,T I ,~ -:,01,0, ~-.u,Â»m-*Cr~- A,0 -I PRELIMINARY 04-p. 40Â»-TE, ri--1,~~.â„¢J.1- -u.-Ir~,1â„¢Gui Ii. ,~Cl- NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION SOUTH SPRING STREET DURANT STREET LEGEND DUINAGE EASEMENT - Â·- - - PROPERTY LINE rowland+broughton archhcture / urban design / intenor design ' ~ PUBLIC PEDESTRIAN EASEMENT /-ki' 970.544.9006 0 303.308.1373 0 234 e hopkins ave 1830 blake st ste 200 aspen,co 81611 denver, co 80202 970.544.34731 303.308.1375 f NOTES 1. LAYOUT DIMENSIONS ARE FROM THE BACK OF CURB -- UNLESS OTHERWISE STATED. _P~OPERTY U 4 / , 0 1 1 Consultants WIDE DRAINAGE AIWD ~ bluegreen UTILITY EASEM ENT \1 idl 1 3 ,~ 113 1 -r 4% - ty/ CHATEAU aspen, co 81611 300 s spring st, suite 202 970.429.7499 0 970.429.9499 f DUMONT www.bluegreer,"pen.com 10.8' WIDE DRAINAGE AND UTILITY EASEMENT 1 p. 1 1 m I i 18' WIDE PRIVATE. NON-EXCLUSIVE Issue: INGRESS/EGRESS EASEMENT FOR 07.14.15 d CHATEAU CHAUMONT AND CHATEAU JIll DUMONT PLANNED DEVELOPMENT DETAILED REVIEW APPLICATION 6' WIDE DRAINAGE ANC 1 V . UTILITY EASEMENT , 3 L - --3 C . 1 11 - i'; 11 1/-/..-J)I 111 ili PUBLIC PEDESTRIAN EASEMENT 1 = 1 ~ -~ I ~ ~ ALLEY 111 / 1--a PROPERTY LINE PLANTER 2 . A .... I ==M GLORY HOLE 1 ./ hi r i - 1-1 4 , 1 CONDOMINIUMS 041 L..1 --, A1 4 311 Elli 1, i IND , 1 -1 En E-3 r - 1 E 1 r -- '1 - - EN-' - . L_1 --'L_IL-'ULE '- 'r--Ell -- SKY HOTEL 00 -g F 709 E. DURANT AVENUE ASPEN, CO 81611 1 \ ..../*..= -.-~--V.E..I 3/'l'.1 -I. ....'- .3 ---:==.-2 -.r-7= .... ~-1~~ PRIVATE RESIDENCE 6 I \ \4 YA T \C/ \I 2 ~rl- 4 16=_] - - - 2- -- - J -11Â£= - _ -p ' ' PROPERTY LINE Ll 0. 0 83 42. 0 -L I NORTH 414/7 CIa PROJECT NO: 21406 DWG FILE: \ .4.4.i BG L SERIES SKY HOTEL.dwg - ..1 SHEET TITLE ASPEN ALPS CONDOMINIUMS STREET LEVEL LAYOUT PLAN - OPTION B SCALE: 0 8 16 PUBUC PEDESTRIAN EASEMENT i LZOOB T}1 --*1,Â£- NTEMT CUT-~8 41, n- OC.1/WI PRELIMINARY -%*,m/-2--M-#m-- -Tâ€¢Â»Â£.u=01-:,1.1.-mrâ€¢â€¢-ImED~-~ra 4 NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION i! SOUTH SPRING STREET DURANT STREET LEGEND ( t) ON STREET PARKING STALLS OIl<[ PACK BENCH INTEGRATED INTO ---- PROPERTY LINE C SITE WALL PERVIOUS PAVERS - SNOWMELT rowland+broughton archnectum / urban design /interior deen PROPOSED ADA RAMT - - - CINCH INTEGRATED INTO SITE WALL 1/4- MINUS EXPOSED BIKE RACK pRoposE-li~ m- 303.308.13751 /Â»/1 4 AGGREGATE CONCRETE *it 234 e hopkins ave 1830 blake st,ste 200 RAISED PLANTER 970.S44.9006 0 303.308.1373 0 =%\RAISED CURE PLANTER ISLAND ampen. co 81611 denver, co 80202 PERVIOUS PAVERS- BOLLARD SNOWMELT 11 1 PROPOSED ADA RAMP tra-Â»J PROPOSED ADA R.AMP SIGNAGE/BRANDING PROP'Fl*Y NE ASPHALT SCREEN W*L RAISED PLANTER GRASS-CRETE AREA Consultants -1 L U BENCI, -~1~-eLANTING DID bluegreen 1 4-1 300 s spring st, suite 202 aspen. co 81611 - 5TREEr TM. TYr . ~ 970.429.7499 0 CHATEAU 970.429.9499 f k.\ DUMONT www.bluegreenaspen.com RAISED PLANTER NÂ« I Issue: .hE LANDSCAPE BUFFER - GRASS-CRETE AREA 07.14.15 4\ 3 DETAILED REVIEW APPUCATION 11 1 4 BOLLARD ~ ~ z j [ 1 ~ a ill E]-] E - = 17- 0 . 1 - 1 1 04 - 1 1 MECHANICAL AIR INTAKE WITH - GRATE - - DROP OFF PARKING AND ' | - - h r VAL-ET SERVICE AREA 11 i LU U I =- j 1 - .1 -- 11 1 1 K I k I--J 1 1 PEDE5TRIAN WALKWAY ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ALLEY PERVIOUS PAVERS 1 TIERED LANDSCAPE WAU SNOWMELT - _pROPERTY Ng_ 1 PLANTER LM PLâ€¢ prrun i I PROPOSED ADA RAMr L 1 2-r T T ....... ....9.- ...... -7* .=..-# 4=-- CONDOMINUMS FIr 1 -4. GLORY HOLE 4 [ 3 8-4 A I -1/ lili rj... r I--1 I ri iF 1 11 / ,1 .--7 11 '-1 2 . 17 i n- TIERED PLANTING AREA USED FOR WATER QUALITY TREATMENT 1 IL--.11.----- ~!L --- =-7 .Â·t -- -- 1 - i-/ SKY HOTEL 1Â· MINUS EXPOSED AGGREGATE CONCRETE V ] f PROPOSED ADA RArdr 709 E. DURANT AVENUE CONTINUATION OF PUBLIC ASPEN, CO 81611 SIDEWALK TO SECOND PRIVATE RESIDENCE FLOOR TERRACE/PUBLIC ~=1.,-*-2 Pt- 1- l - - - ----- - - I -1 - I ACCESS PEDESTRIAN CROSSING . EXISTING ALPS PARKING \ 1 -6 PROPOSED ADA RAMP (44 -1 " r j \44\\ PROPOSED ADA RAMP PROPERTY ONE BENCH - PROPOSED CURB CUT V),- PROJECT NO: I NORTH BICYCLE PACKING ~ v, 1: ~ 5* DWG FILE: AT-GRADE PLANTING BED 21406 PERVIOUS FAVCRS SNOWMELT 14\ 1 $ 4 RAISED PLANTERS BG L SERIES SKY HOTEL.dwg i" MINUS tAPUbtu AGGREGATE CONCRETE ASPEN ALPS CONDOMINIUMS SHEET TITLE PROPOSED ADA RAMP STREET LEVEL MATERIALS PLAN . SCALE: o 8 16 L300 PRELIMINARY - -M. n,Â» **#-. u~ED -â„¢WT ne -CM NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION 6,*--I---0--4... I -L .1 ..11 DURANT STREET- LEGEND (4) ON STREET PARKING STALLS BENCH INTEGRATED INTO OIl<[ RACK - - - - PROPERTY LINE 'C~7 SITE WALL PIR.VIOUS PAVER5 - SNOWMELT rowland+broughton PROPOSED ADA RAtÂ·lr ~-.*-- 0[PICH INTEGRATED INTO SITE WALL 1/4" MINUS EXPOSED Â· BIKE RACK architecture / urban design / interior design AGGREGATE CONCRETE 4 4 0 - - 1830 blake st, ste 200 ~~ RAISED CURB PLANTER ISLAND PERVIOUS PAVERS- BOLLARD 970.544.3473f 303 308.1375 f aspen, co 81611 denver, co 80202 MISID PLANTER 970.544.90060 303.308.1373 0 , SNOWMELT â€¢ PROPOSED ADA ~ r PROPOSED ADA RAMP j - PROPOSED ADA RAMP ASPHALT SIGNAGE/BRANDING PROP EÂ¢TY ~INE SCREEN WALL Fl- 1 2 29 -_ Consultants .. AREA RAISED PlANTER GRASS-CRETE DENCH : n 3/8" MINUS COMPACTED -~A+--tLANTING OCD i ' bluegreen 300 5 spring st, suite 202 1 4_ I C aspen, co 81611 STREET T*. rl,PJ | 970.429.7499 0 DUMONT wiw. bluegreenaspen.corn CHATEAU 970.429.9499 f 0 RAISED PLANTER 4, . - EJ- 1 1 -Icq l' Issue LANDSCAPE BUFFER GRASS-CRETE AREA 07.14.15 JE 1 DETAILED REVIEW APPUCATION BOLLARD r -Iii-4 l." 91 0 h' 1 JA NE 0 . u #8 Z - ~ ~~1 - MECHANICAL AIR INTAKE WITH GRATE Nrop oFF rAtuaNG AND " *4 - f - VALET SERVICE AREA | | 1 1 I | 229 1 1 1 1 1 i 13 1 I 1-1 111 PEDESTRIAN WALKWAY -0 1 I 1 L.2 PERVIOUS PA'.'CRS SNOWMELT ALLEY TIERED LANDSCAPE WAU 17Â» ~43. ---- -IR- ---- -; - - --2-- 4-pippiarigivf-- PROPOSED ADA RAMP f.- - 1 2~ 1 71..,rro. 1 1 F Â®=1 1 1 r ..... 'r .... - ... ---r -:!-4 -1 GLORY HOLE CONDOMINIUMS UE 0 i /4 ''.1 1 7 r '' 1 -- 1 1Â§ *-/ 1 r - TIERED PLANTINC AREA USED FOR WATER QUALITY "REATMENT - 1 1 4 - SKY HOTEL - 1" MINUS EXPOSED AGGREGATE CONCRETE PROPOSED ADARAMP -- --3~1,1 1 709 E. DURANT AVENUE N 4 CONTINUATION OF PUBLIC ASPEN, CO 81611 SIDEWALK TO SECOND <.&... ....== i =='I- --.= 2 â„¢Ga~/I ---= -I-= -..% -*./. 1,10: 6.. :~ ...... I- FLOOR TERRACE/PUBUC A ESS 12 141~1 - - PRIVATE RESIDENCE - -n PEDESTRIAC: CROOSING ~ ~~~~'~, ~ .'f1 1 1 Et *Y % 1 11 PROPOSED ADA RAMT bl , 111 \X/1,\1 '.7---/ \. 1 4-----0 1 -62 _---_-_--__ 1L1_ ---N ._1 PROPERTY UNE PROPOSED ADA RAMP 9 NORTH BENCH X\2\\22*rif,1 # BICYCLE PARKING - i' MINUS COMPACTED AGGREGATE PATH #3,- PROJECT NO: (3) PROPOSED DIAGONAL PARKING SPACES (3) PROPOSED DIAGONAL PARKING SPACES 21406 PERVIOUS PAVERS Â· SNOWMELT 44 AT-GRADE PLANTING BED (0) PROPOSED PARALLEL PARKING SPACES DWG FILE: BG L SERIES SKY HOTEL,dwg .1/OFf RAID[D rLANT[RS ~" MINUS ti/ubtu 1 AGGREGATE CONCRETE ASPEN ALPS CONDOMINIUMS SHEET TITLE PROPOSED ADA RAMP STREET LEVEL MATERIALS PLAN - OPTION B SCALE: 0 8 16 L300B ne -â‚¬,- .- 0,1,-MMEn :,Â¢ â„¢~ 0~1.~= m PRELIMINARY 7---5---Dum:,1--~-_ NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION -TN~.U G~- LU, ITArUT~~f ~1~ Cr~- 1~*~~D -,fa *Ill./7-r-1.- N mÂ¥"E-*#DiJOL/k*N=LYIU.-9 - 1.-1. W- LEGEND SYMBOL ABBR. COMMON NAME BOTANICAL NAME SIZE SPACING SYMBOL ABBR. COMMON NAME BOTANICAL NAME SIZE SPACING TREES PERENNIAL PLANTING AREAS rowland+broughton amMedum/urban design /litedo, des,ign 0-OY ORANGE YELLOW HUES 2000 sf . Pt QUAKING ASPEN POPULUS TREMULOIDES 16' PER PLAN 234 e hopkins ave 1630 blake st, ste 200 18' PER PLAN ORANGES AND LEMONS GAILLARDIA 'FANFARE BLAZE' #1 GAL. 4 PLANTS / 100sf aspen,co 81611 denver, co aC202 BLANKETFLOWER 970.544.90060 303.308.1373 0 20 PER PLAN 970.544.3473, 303.308.1375 f MOUNTAIN BASKET OF GOLD ALYSSUM MONTANUM #1 GAL. 4 PLANTS / 100sf Af AUTUMN BLAZE MAPLE ACER X FREEMANII AUTUMN 16' PER PLAN 'MOUNTAIN GOLD' BLAZE 18' PER PtAN Y YELLOW HUES 2000 sf MOONSHINE YARROW ACHILLEA MOONSHINE #1 GAL 4 PLANTS / 100sf Js SIENNA GLEN MAPLE ACER X FREEMANII SIENNA 14' PER PLAN #1 GAL, 4 PLANTS / 1005f CUSHION SPURGE EUPHORBIA POLYCHROMA GLEN KANNAH CREEK SULPHUR ERIOGONUM UMBELLATUM #1 GAL. 4 PLANTS / 100sf FLOWER KANNAH CREEK Pt ROCKY MOUNTAIN ACER GRANDIDENTATUM 3" CAL. PER PLAN Consultants GLOW MAPLE ROCKY MOUNTAIN GLOW 5" CAL PER PLAN ~__ GV GROUNDCOVERS & VINES 2000 sf HOPVINE HUMULUS LUPULUS #1 GAL. 4 PLANTS / 10]Osf O Pac AUTUMN PURPLE ASH FUXINUS AMERICANA 3" CAL. PER PLAN NEOMEXIGNUS AUTUMN PURPLE 5" CAL. PER PLAN CREEPING SPEEDWELL VERONICA 'WATERPERRY BLUE' #1 GAL. 4 PLANTS / 100sf WOOLLY THYME THYMUS PARECOX #1 GAL 4 PLANTS / 100sf 300 s spring st, suite 202 0 'PSEUDOLANUGINOSUS' aspen, co 81611 PaC SPRING SNOW CRABAPPLE MALUS 'SPRING SNOW' 3" CAL PER PLAN 970.429.7499 0 970.429.9499 f 5" CAL. PER PLAN www.bluegreenaspen.com NOTE SHRUBS 1. PLANT SPECIES, SIZE, SPACING, AND QUANTITIES ARE SUBJECT TO CHANGE RaG GREEN MOUND CURRANT RIBES ALPINUM 'GREEN #15 PER PLAN MOUND' Issue: 07.14.15 Faf TALL FERNLEAF BUCKTHORN FRANGULA ALNUS FINE UNE #15 PER PLAN PLANNED DEVELOPMENT DETAILED REVIEW APPUCATION CsA ARCTIC FIRE DOGWOOD CORNUS SERICEA ARCTIC #15 PER PLAN FIRE CaB BUD'S YELLOW DOGWOOD CORNUS ALBA 'BUD'S #5 PER PLAN YELLOW' CsM BLOODTWIG DOGWOOD CORNUS SANGUINEA #15 PER PLAN 'MIDWINTER FIRE' GRASSES i MIS NARROW LEAF MISCANTHUS SINENSIS #15 PER PLAN MAIDEN GRASS 'SARABANDE' e Ss, PRAIRIE BLUES LITTLE SCHIZACHYRIUM SCOPARIUM #15 PER PLAN BLUESTEM 'PRAIRIE BLUES' O Mc SILKY SPIKE MELIC GRASS MELICA CILIATA #15 PER PLAN DCN VARIEGATED TUFTED HAIR DESCHAMPSIA CESPITOSA B&!3 PER PLAN GRASS 'NORTHERN LIGHTS' PERENNIAL PLANTING AREAS 0-- OB DEEP BLUE HUES 2000 sf PERENNIAL BACHELOR CENTAUREA MONTANA # 1 GAL 4 PLANTS / 100sf BUTTON TIGER PENSTEMON PENSTEMON MENSARUM # 1 GAL 4 PLANTS / 100sf DWARF BLUE LARKSPUR DELPHINIUM GRANDIFLORUM # 1 GAL 4 PLANTS / 100sf 'SUMMER NIGHTS' SKY HOTEL Li~- Ma MID BLUE HUES 2000 sf BLUE FORTUNE HYSSOP AGASTACHE 'BLUE FORTUNE' # 1 GAL 4 PLANTS / 100sf DWARF BLUEFLAG IRIS IRIS SETOSA ARTICA # 1 GAL 4 PLANTS / 100sf LITTLE TRUDY CATMINT NEPETA X LITTLE TRUDY # 1 GAL 4 PLANTS / 100sf 709 E. DURANT AVENUE ILL~ BM BLUE-MAGENTA HUES 2000 sf ASPEN, CO 81611 PURPLE GAYFEATHER LIATRIS SPICATA 'FLORI5TAN VIOLET' #1 GAL 4 PLANTS / 100sf MAY NIGHT SALVIA SALVIA NEMOROSA'MAY NIGHT #1 GAL. 4 PLANTS / 100sf PURPLE ROCKCRESS AUBRIETADELTOIDEA #1 GAL 4 PLANTS / 100sf 'PURPLE GEM' M MAGENTA HUES 2000 sf ECHINACEA PURPUREA 'RUBY AQUILEGIA CAERULEA #1 GAL 4 PLANTS / 100sf STAR' GALLERY PINK LUPINE LUPINUS 'GALLERY PINK' #1 GAL. 4 PLANTS / 100sf 01- MR MAGENTA RED HUES 2000 sf ROSE CAMPION LYCHNIS CORONARIA # 1 GAL 4 PLANTS / 100sf 'ASTROSANGUINEA' PRAIRIEWINECUPS CALLIRHOE INVOLUCRATA # 1 GAL 4 PLANTS / 100sf RED VALERIAN CENTRANTHUS RUBER # 1 GAL 4 PLANTS / 100sf PROJECT NO: R RED HUES 2000 sf 21406 DWG FILE: MALTESE CROSS LYCHNIS CHALCEDONICA #1 GAL 4 PLANTS / 100sf SG L SERIES SO HOTEL.dwg RED BEE BALM MONARDA 'CAMBRIDGE SCARLET' #1 GAL 4 PLANTS / 100sf RED CORAL BELLS HEUCHERA SANGUINEA #1 GAL 4 PLANTS / 100sf SHEET TITLE 'SPLENDENS' PLANTING LEGEND EL~ Ro RED ORANGE HUES 2000 sf LUCIFER MONTBRETIA CROCOSMIA 'LUCIFER' #1 GAL 4 PLANTS / 100sf RED AVENS GEUM CHILOENSE 'MRS. BRADSHAW' #1 GAL 4 PLANTS / 100sf CALIFORNIA FLISCHIA ZAUSCHNERIA GARRETTII #1 GAL 4 PLANTS / loosf SCALE: ORANGE CARPET 0 ORANGE HUES 2000 sf L400 - ORANGE DAYLILY HEMEROCALLIS FULVA # 1 GAL 4 PLANTS / 100sf GAY BUTTERFLY ASCLEPIS TUBEROSA # 1 GAL 4 PLANTS / 100sf ne .,r]-rn, .~ ne-- -râ„¢T Co,frA,er] rÂ», n- 0*]aul-wr. ORANGE GLOBE MALLOW SPHAERALCEA MUNROANA # 1 GAL 4 PLANTS / 100sf PRELIMINARY NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION 00000 - -* Ck-~_GA~P~la L ~Ak~ =C~ HOiEL- DURANT STREET- LEGEND SYMBOL DESCRIPTION/NAME TREES rowland+broughton TYP. EVERGREEN OR DECIDUOUS TREE architecture / u,ban design / interior de/gl 0 DECIDUOUS TREE PLANTING 234 e hopkins ave 1830 blake at ste 200 ampen,co 81811 denver. CO 80202 970.544.90060 303.308.1373 0 ~ PERENNIAL PLANTING AREAS 970.544.3473f 301308.1375 f 2 HARDY PERENNIAL AREAS PROPER.rY <GF f L D(-4 I * SIIRUB PLANTING Consultants NOTE 1, PUNT SPECIES, SIZE. S~CING. AND ~ES ARE SUBJECT TO CHANGE bluegreen 3 Cl / _ 300 s spring st, suite 202 970.429.7499 0 .- .-' CHATEAU aspen, co 81611 970.429.9499 f F' 1 < , DUMONT www.bluegreenaspen.com r[RCNNIAL PLANTING - j li' J 42) --- 1 . 41 11 1.- 07.14.15 A k 1 1 PLANNED DEVELOPMENT DETAILED REVIEW APPUCATION dr 1 . 11.1 - 1 1 dE : LJ *- 1 1 LI E- -1 --r 1 1 1-- F i 1 .2--- 1 ! ]- 1 -1-*.~ j i 1 ALLEY 7 5-= ...li". .,Mâ€ž-4â€ž- -- . .... -1 1-- 1- 1 7 1 : - =tir - E 1 ' i / I 1 1337 -1 1__1 <-'21-'Ld L - 2---T- 1 l -g - 0 - SKY HOTEL , A-:27 _ 709 E. DURANT AVENUE ASPEN, CO 81611 WI X2* rupro- ././.- i] - '-I'- -- --.-- - - + 19 9 ~ ji)~~ m ~ ~~ ,< <t,\ EXISTING ALPS PARKING ~\ \ \/4 PROPERTY LINE m '(PÂ·Â·4 -~~24.0 I NORTH 2, EVERGREEN TREE PLANTING 21406 PROJECT NO: DWG FILE: aG L SERIES SKY HOTEL.dwg ASPEN ALPS CONDOMINIUMS SHEETTITLE STREET LEVEL PLANTING PLAN SCALE: o 8 16 L401 Tne -* * #-FW1* C- n- nr.2:1~J~-NT - PRELIMINARY 0.-CD, I.-I. I,--...... U.LU-1,-JJYTI'.LO- NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION ~1-T- SOUTH SPRING STREET DURANT STREET LEGEND 1 DESCRIPTION/NAME TREES rowland+broughton \\\\ TYP. EVERGREEN OR DECIDUOUS TREE arth,tictum / urban design / interior daign 0 DECIDUOUS TREE PLANTING 234 e hopk#ns ave 1830 blake M. ste 200 970.544.1477 303.308.1375 f PERENNIAL PLANTING AREAS aspen,co 81811 dimer. co 80202 970.S44.9006 0 303.308.1373 0 HARDY PERENNIAL AREAS PROPERfY LINE 4 -E h ~221 4 rD<4 01 Illuo PLANTING ~ .45 Consultants If Nifl) C NOTE 1 J_I 1 MUNT SPEam, SIZE, S~CNG, AND QbANTITIES ARE SUWEa TO CHANGE ~ bluegal 300 s 5prIng st, 5uite 202 aspen, co 81611 970.429.7499 0 CHATEAU 4 1-11 . - DUMONT www.bluegreenaspen.com 970.429.9499 f 1 ./ r[RENNIAL PLANTING 1 . A ff & 4 - 11 1 1 1 -ue: 3 El .DETAILED REVIEW APPLICATION 07.14.15 PLANNED DEVELOPMENT W OF NE 131 r . /CO 11 1 i'10 1 1 111 '1111 3 9 --... f. 1 I i 11 Il t- 4-02)i 1 1 177Â»-1 1 1 1 U 1.-Â· i 1 1 i ~-4-4_ 1 ALLEY PROPERTY UNE 0. 1*-1 ,-i 1 --- i LI 1 1%'E ll 1/1 !1 1 1 4 / f--1 1 r r---- 1 r- -lr- - F[3-7 -'u/-JLJ 2-1 ' - '' 22 ' -- '--3- -- AL SKY HOTEL 0e 1 -2 1 1 - 709 E, DURANTAVENUE =.=..1, -m- =--- __=.*= .=-= 1-.- -*M. ASPEN, CO 81611 A .,1.1 r.31(Â»914 00 (91(-foo 00 64Â» 1 4-- 4 I \ 4%13 Ozy j LA PROPERTY UNE 'L I NORTH PROJECT NO: 21406 / 6 EVERGREEN TREE PLANTING ' DWG FILE: \ BG L SERIES SKY HOTEL.dwg ASPEN ALPS CONDOMINIUMS SHEET TITLE ' STREET LEVEL PLANTING PLAN - OPTION B SCALE: 0 -8-- -16 L401B ne 1-:- 4~. --= C~~* - -Zl-I PRELIMINARY T- -C-r~ C~ ROâ€¢~U,16â€¢-LAJ-TEÂ»1 -C~Urn- A~ ~a- NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION SOUTH SPRING STREET p-. m umrÂ¥ â€¢.-u ..,-,0-~0 ..U..1 leâ€¢Â£.nlly.~>na - ----------- LEGEND SYMBOL DESCRIPTION/NAME TREES I rowland+broughton architecture i urban d"gn i interior deign 0 TYP. DECIOUOUS TREE 234 e hopkins ave 1830 blake st, sta 200 PLANTING aspen, co 81611 denver. CO 80202 970.544.9006 0 303.308.1373 0 970.544.3473f 303.308.1375f 1 ROOFTOP DECIDUOUS TREE PERENNIAL PLANTING AREAS uv Ip=2.-lf. 11111'll I i [3] HARDY PERENNIAL AREAS 1/-#. h 36# PooL LOUNGE I UL' \ 7 IALLOW SEDUM TRAY Consultants f I NOTE | 1. PLANT SPECIES, SIZE, SPACING, AND QUANTITIES ARE SUBJECT TO CHANGE bluegreen ROOFFOP PERENNIAL i pa.AN=TING ~ 300 5 ~ng s~ sul~ 202 /Spen, co 81611 970.429.7499 0 970.429.9499 f www.bluegreer,aspen.com 1 1 1 H20 Issue: 620 SF - 07.14.15 ROOFTOP SHRUB PLANTING PLANNED DEVELOPMENT DETAILED REVIEW APPUCATION 7 -fu 1 r- - - 1 'xl Fxl UPPER MIDDLE 14=1 ILE LEVEL LEVEL -- 1 -2 - - - i --1 1 1 tr ===71,- , m - -A - C A - IL-, K <). )@lEi -_ -1 111 ( C )111 1-2--4 - I i - -- 1 -Eug =====i 12 6 C 91) 9 - SPA LOUNGE <Â»4 OWNERS' 120 SE LOUNGE H20 f 4 ~A== BAR/LOUNGE 0 E-' I - 1 UPPER H2O 1 LEVEL 1 | El | 94SF I afFIR_tc<) I SHALLOW SEDUM TRAY SI IALLOW SEDUM TRAY ~ 0 1-- - lill- - - ---- - - Ill'.-I - --Il-0 - -.Ill.-Il ------------ SKY HOTEL -I 00 / / 709 E. DURANT AVENUE ~ ASPEN, CO 81611 I - LOWER LEVEL ROOF TERRACE WITIr , 1 IIUII NORTH L /07 PROJECT NO: 17 - - 21Qh DWG FILE. BG L SERIES SKY HOTEL.dwg I - ------ - - SHEET TITLE / ROOF LEVEL PLANTING PLAN / SCALE: 0 8 16 L401-R SECOND FLOOR TERRACE PRELIMINARY .6-.. 110 8-T c, rl- -9~~All- 1-Â¥ - U-/ -i}Â«ail TI. ...C. NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION 1 2.--1~1 + :/F UNIT SPACE {L) 82.@E OD LODGE BASEMENTL1 LEMEL' 1376 SF (1335 NET~~* 17.080 SF LODGE 11.168 SF NET LIVABLE rk 9,312 IF LODGE 0 SF NET LIVABLE 120/F COMMERCIAL 100 SF NET LEASABLE 386 SF COMMERCIAL 344 IF NET LEASABLE - OSF RESIDENCES 0 SF NET LIVABLE UNIT SPACE (L) oSF RESIDENCES SFNET LIVABLE 0/F AH' 0 SF NET LIVA8LE 1.876 SF AHU 1714 SF NET LIVABLE --- +24 221 IF NON-UNIT SPACE 303 SF + 6 625 SF NONÂ·UNIT SPACE -0-35-2 -1 33,653 SF TOTAL AREA 25.967 SF TOTALAREA rowland+broughton UNIT SPACE (L) LODGE : ..10 1 a,chilaclure/urban de~,gn//teriordesi. 9312 SF 1586 SF (1454 NET(7---- -/ 1 -3 Â® 1--<- 1 234 e hopkins ave 1830 blake st ste. 200 aspe/,co 81611 denver' co 80202 ~ 5 LODGE 4 1 970 544 9006 0 303 3081373 0 970 544 34731 303.308.1375' â‚¬ 1766 SF (1614 NET) - ' 1 LODGE 2088 SF NON-UNIT -: Â· - Â·i 1--1 Rd @ t / 24*/Â®1 (1941 NET) 'Â® UNIT SPACE {L),4-Â» L--6 5081 SF -- -Â· -- - 1 ' AH.U. 2697 SF 1876 SF 1 COMM .2 - ,- (1714 NET) ConsultantsÂ· 120 SF(120 SF NET) J .7 LODGE - --- I PARKING ~F' NON UNIT SPACE I rrid---------- - ,-~-- ,/ 865 SF (814 NET) 19260 SF 6625 SF ! . - - UNIT SPACE {L) 282 SF LODGE @ 4428 sf- (4010 NET) UNIT SPACE (1) / COMM 1600 SF 386 SF (344 NET) plotlate: 7/13/20154Â·19:49 PM ~Ph PROPOSED BASEMENT LEVEL FLOOR AREA CALCULATION riph PROPOSED LEVEL ONE FLOOR AREA CALCULATION Ismul l ..0, ) 1-â€¢40Â·I 07.14.2015 DETAILED .-I NON-UNIT REVIEW APPLICATION 222 SF LODGE 426 SF (405 NET) LODGE /1 LODGE 1322 SF LEVEL3 SUB GRADE BASEMENT WALL EXPOSURE SF CALCULATIONS (1214 NED 17.630 SF LODGE 13,568 SF NET UVABLE 1264-2(1248 NET)- \ 24000 SF LODGE 18,836 SF NET LIVABLE 3.073 SF COMMERCIAL 2.903 SF NET LEASABLE OSF COMMERCIAL SFNET LEASAIE OSF RESIDENCES SF NET Li VAILE NON-UNIT o SF RESIDENCES SF NET LIVABLE UNIT SPACE (L) 4- ~ :' | osF AHU SF NET LJVABLE ./2* â€¢79/SF NON-UNIT SPACE + 3092 SF NON-UNIT SPACE 237 SF OSF AHU SF NET LIVABLE 1345 SF 23,795 SF TOTAL AREA 24 794 SF TOTAL AREA LODGE 4/47 Â·,Â·,Â· ,thÂ· ,4347 Â»/21/,19'.1 ..,t.//a + 3455 SF (3200 NET) -- _.4 i ~ ~ ,..1 â€ž,A V Rt:%%%:%%4 LODGE 2645 SF (2442 NET) . LODGE BELOW GRADE AREA. 2.743 IF BELOW GRADE AREA 829 SF -.1 1 COMM. LODGE 1311 SF(1262 NET) 20722(1933 NET) -1- 1 - SPRING STREET (WEST ELEVATION) -) SOUTHWEST DIAGONAL 2082 61 (1940 NET) Â· 7- b LODGE UNIT SPACE (u . l-- r LODGE UNIT 4 LA j (82 ]4 1 r r-- 3026-SE (2793 NET) miSE NON-UNIT NON-UNIT 270 SF 298 SF 7--- 1 - 3 2175 SF -, 7--h - -;--~ (2000 NED NON UNIT SPACE E~-/t. - 1=0**j*#21 , LODGE LODGE UNIT , - i NON-UNIT 0%28*%24 2 1%%%8%%%**%%*%88%28%8%84 2600 SF 010199%1 833 SF (786 NET) 1424 9 _ BELOW GRADEAREA: 690 SF BELOW GRADE AREA 2.382 SF 259 SF - 1 r - --- - LODGE UNIT - SOUTHEAST DIAGONAL ~ ASPEN ALPS ACCESS (SOUTH ELEVATION) _ LODGE (1334 NET) UNIT SPACE (L) - t-'7~ I'~ 'Bil i L =1- 840 SF (786 NET) C Â· TO ->- -11 I IIT I 11 lili (97 27 118 SF : ~]j 1-u ..Liiii : 1 UNITSPACE(L) UBBE-En 2047 SF p 1 1.--1 COMM - 1492 SF LODGE --7 1762 SF(1641 NET) /V LODGE UNIT f F 2166 SF (1979 NET) LODGE 2175 SF TERRACE ,/ \V\,/ 3927 SF LODGE (2000 NET) Wme#*11113'-0 #%00000000%%8%8%8%*1 SKY HOTEL 1790 SF (3607 NET) 2983 SF (2737 NET) ~ BELOW GRADE AREA 945 SF 8ELOUGRADEAREA 2.446 SF Â® ORIGINAL STREET (EAST ELEVATION) ALLEY (NORTH ELEVATION) rn PROPOSED LEVEL TWO FLOOR AREA CALCULATION ra PROPOSED LEVEL THREE FLOOR AREA CALCULATION < POD 5, ...... 709 E. DURANT AVE .-I ASPEN, CO 81611 LODGE UNIT 3-/ I ROOF PLAN te:%*%%%88*8%88% 1848 SF 13.650 SF LODGE 12.937 IF NET LIVABLE OSF LODGE BELOVA'GRADE AREA 1.537 SF (1767 NET) \ _F-----m_ OSF COMMERCIAL 0 SF NET LEASABLE OSF COMMERCIAL 133 SF NET LEASABLE 1 , o SF RESIDENCES 0 SF NET LIVA8LE OSF RESIDENCES CS' AHW 0 SF NET LIVABLE CSF AHU Â® ALLEY (SOUTH ELE\9 Â® ALLEY (SOUTH ELEV) +0/F NON-UNIT SPACF 4 --4 +3121 IF NON-UNIT @PAC& 16.771 SF TOTALAREA OSF TOTAL AREA LODGE UNIT TERRACE 0%%%*%%%/4 1 3'-Cr 0 2152 SF -2 1 1 LODGE UNIT 7900 SF 8ELOW GRADE AREA 1,255 SF '1 3 2044 SF ~ DURANT AVE. (NORTH ELEV.) (2023 NET) ELEVATOR- PROJECT NOÂ· EXEMPT Â« F : 1--4 LODGE UNIT FROM FAR ON -7X j 2140660 2243 SF (2070 NET) TOP FLOOR NON-UNIT SPACE --'- 4- --- SUBGRADE AREA CALCULATIONS 3121 SF SHEETTIT LE: TERRACE 87 SF EXPOSED GARAGE DOOR/ 13.097 SFWALLAREA = .0066 OR .66% 2892 SF o SF PROPOSED FLOOR COMM ' 1 33,653 - 500 - 33,153 SF BASEMENT * ( 0066) = 219 SF LODGE UNIT 133 SF (NET) (PER SECTION 26.575.020.D.8, RESIDENTIAL (AHU) UNITS, 250 SF SUBÂ·GRADE AREA CALCULATIONS 1969 SF 4Â«1-9- LODGE UNIT GARAGE EXEMPT PER UNIT, THUS 500 SF EXEMPT TAKEN FROM THE TOTAL 1768 SF (1856 NET) SUE-GRADE GROSS SF) (1629 NET) SCALE: As indicated j LODGE UNIT ~ 1626 SF PDO.5 4 (1534 NET) 4 /73 PROPOSED LEVEL FOUR FLOOR AREA CALCULATION rA PROPOSED ROOF LEVEL FLOOR AREA CALCULATION 122'AU'r'# - -Â·I l ./05 ) 1Â· u ... a 0 UNIT SPACE (L) BASEMENT Ll iliE LEEVEL 1 LODGE --- 17 NSF LODGE 11,168 SF NET LIVABLE 1',1 120 SF COMMERCIAL 100 SF NET LEASABLE 1376 SF {1335 NETIE /-1 9.2 IF LODGE OSF NET UVA8. Â·-- 388 SF COMMERCIAL 344 SF NET LEASABLE OSF RESIDENCES OSF NET LIVABLE OSF RESIDENCES SF NET L[VABLE OSF AHU 0 SF NET LIVABLE 1.878 IF AHU 1.714 SF NET LIVABLE 2 . | + 26592 /F NON.UNIT SPACE UNIT SPACE (LI 1_k_] 11 tilia,~ NON-UNITSPACE @~ 25,967 IF TOTAL AREA UNIT SPACE (L) Â· 35.904 SF TOTAL AREA SE -214 - L rowland+broughton . 9312 SF Â· Â· ' ' r--- 8rchitecture / urban design /inte~ier de~ign -, LODGE 0 234 0 hopkins ave 1830 blake st 5/ 200 12&-2 41454 NET-1- - -~ ~ aspen. 81611 dinver. co 80202 970544 9006 0 303 30813730 LODGE 970544.3473 1 303,30813751 ..El;f @ 1766 SF Â£ 1614 NET) 7 LODGE NON-UNIT 0 2088Â· SF 0941 NETI 5081 SF UNIT SPACE (LI ----- 6 | L.~= 1 AHU COMM 22Z.2 ~ ~= -r. 7-12' 1876 SE 120 SF(120 SF NET) - (1714 NER 4 0 : ,. 45Â·4 ./. Consult,nts: ==5'. LODGE PARKING 4--4---- -il.--.-I..- - ~73--_L- .-~___2E2E (814 NED NON UNIT SPACE 21511 SF 22&.SE ' UNITr SPACE IU 4 p.1.j - .Â· z=.SE ---- ~Â· LODGE 2 4 .1 EME :4010 NER UNIT SPACJ (u. / 1665 SF COMM 386 SF (344 NET) Plot Dati, 7/1)20154:19Â·52 PM rih PROPOSED BASEMENT LEVEL FLOOR AREA CALCULATION /1-h PROPOSED LEVEL ONE FLOOR AREA CALCULATION issue Pga~b) râ€¢Â«7Â·I fel'/ 1Â·Â·10- 07.142015 DETAILED NON-UNIT .-I REVIEW 222 SF ' - 1 LODGE APPLICATION 426 SF (405 NET) LODGE LEVEL 2 LODGE ~ - LEMEL.1 1322 ST . - 1~ - SUBGRADE BASEMENTWALLEXPOSURE SFCALCULATIONS 136.4 SF {1248 NET) ~h- {1214 NET) 1763/SP LODGE 13.568 SF NET LIVABLE 24.0]0 SF LODGE 15,836 IF NET LIVABLE 7 0, 41 3.073 SF COMMERCIAL 2 903 SF NET LEASABLE NON-UNIT %*47/507> /ae OSF COMMERCIAL SF NET LEASABLE OSF RESIDENCES SF NET .VAILE OSF RESIDENCES SF NET LIVABLE UNIT SPACE (L) OSF AHU sF NET LivABLE 237 SF OSF AHU SF NET LIVABLE 1345 ST . I ,/ Â»:-' . 3 092 SE NON-UNIT SPACE b'*t 1.Zil.2 NON-UNIT SPACE i r C:Â· -7 .-,4 23,795 SF TOTALAREA LODGE -â€žâ€ž-7-1 24,734 SF TOTALAREA EÂ«Â«45,3 FUÂ».ftÂ»*9%93/44*920* t 1 1 2miE Ii.1-AE?7-- 4 l I t' LODGE Â· f 21212442 NET) i Â» ~ f , I LODGE /17.09<â‚¬ AGE' 82. 9 COMM. . 1 1 â‚¬2/7... -.44/6 "" 2 ..1 9. LODGE ~ ill. L 1--~-'-- -----~-1311-~4126?NED =zile(1933 NED - Â® SPRING STREET INEST ELEVATION, Â® SOUTHWEST DIAGONAL 4- f 2082 SF {640 NET) ' LODGE UNIT SPACE (L) 20262 92793 NET) 3710 SF NON-UNIT LODGE UNT - 216 SM NON UNITSPACE FU-*-,Â·~Â·/3 -~Lf~ I .4 7=u-Â·Â«M 270 SF (2000 NET, *294% -4., NON-UNIT 2600 SF .>'.1-- ' --. 1~E UNIT I. 1 /' I 7.' -,4â€¢13+ 451 gÂ·) 2, GE_r.Â·4 ./AZâ‚¬ â€¢REA 2 *2 9 'fl 84-~ W~PS NET) 1.137ir-- 1 1 l ~~ ~ H -rd-- -Tf~lifinllfI-fiINRUIffflffJ-imvf~I-rt, 11334 NET) '1Â·~---11 -- LLILLi- 2047 SF LODGE UNIT /'~\ ASPEN ALPS ACCESS ISOUTH ELEVATION) ~ SOUTHEAST DIAGONAL 118 SF Â· , , 4 , 20CO NE-n .- '4>.. l~---Â·f._ UNIT SPACE (L) 1- *T 4- ' . 4.-. COMM .. -~ 3 11222 LODGE / / LODGE UNIT 1762 SF{1641 NET) ~ - 2166 SE i 1979 NET) i LODGE 2175 SF {2000 HET) TER889â‚¬ .- _- 3927 ST LODGE 1790 SF (3607 NET) 2983 SF {2737 NET, 'EL VICâ€¢/CE ./. 4,5 57 'Elt-'Ad/"/41â‚¬51 74>.3P SKY HOTEL /--3 ORIGINAL STREET [EAST ELEVAT-p-Nt ~ ALLEY ANORT" ELEVATION) /Th PROPOSED LEVEL TWO FLOOR AREA CALCULATION /73 PROPOSEDLEVEL THREE FLOOR AREA CALCULATION C-) / 0.-Ct / &Ill 709 E DURANT AVE. LODGE UNIT ASPEN, CO 81611 It#3 1,"' Wiliiii/iij'ill//Difill/lim. LEVEL 4 ROOF PLAN Mâ€¢T'.Â·: 0<40â‚¬ AJqfÂ·a â€¢ /0.- 9 13.650 SF LODGE 12.937 SF NET LIVABLE 0 SF LODGE 12 -ALLg_{spy-ry El:EY? ~ALLE-Y-GOUTH ELEY) OSF COMMERCIAL 0 SF NET LEASABLE OS' COMMERCIAL 133 SF NET LEASABLE o SF RESIDENCES 0 SF NET LIVABLE OSF RESIDENCES OSF AHU OSF NET LIVABLE OSF AHU +3121 SF NON-UNIT SPACE .92 NON-UNIT SPACE 16.771 SF TOTAL AREA OSF TOTAL AREA LODGE UNIT V-li 94//Â«49/5/A -4u TERFU~CE 'ly",5777777>77-177' -+ 2152 SF P. .1 7900 SF 9+ i '~'4 â€¢12Ar,F â€¢Fal ' 7Â·, . - -r LODGE UNIT - 2212 ~ DURANT AVE ;NORTH ELEV ) 12023 NET) ELEVATOR ~ ...2 EXEMPT -*. 1 LODGE UNIT FROM FAR ON kx 40 2243 SF (2070 NET) TOP FLOOR 1 4 PROJECT NO NONUMT SPACE TERRACE 21406 60 3 121 SF 7 ---, 292_Â§E COMM LODGE UNIT 1 71, L-Â·--~j- -F 0 SF SUBGRADE AREA CALCULATIONS 87 SF EXPOSED GARAGE DOOR/ 13,097 SF WALL AREA = .0066 OR .66% .... 3 - - -- - --.- 33.653 - 500 = 33.153 SFBASEMENT*(.0066)=219 SF LODGE UN,r 133 SF (NET-, (1856 NED 45' 3 1 :*.f..9 _ - - - -- ~ F 1768 SF PROPOSED FLOOR SHEET TITLE. (1629 NET) (PER SECTION 26.575.020.D.8, RESIDENTIAL (AHU) UNITS, 250 SF SUB-GRADE AREA CALCULATIONS GARAGE EXEMPT PER UNIT, THUS 500 SF EXEMPT TAKEN FROM THE TOTAL LED~-E UNIT -~- SUB-GRADE GROSS SF) - OPTION B 152Â§.2 PDO.5b (1534 NET) SCALE: 1Â·' = 40'-0 /-2\ PROPOSED LEVELFOUR FLOOR AREA CALCULATION /Th PROPOSED ROOF LEVEL FLOOR AREA CALCULATION , C ..1 1...4 r #.2 - - ..e....1 / '.147 12 401 ~MutliTAMA,&400~eNT ~ EX.r==A.A. 166.1 ' 11Er I 70,4 -r 1 2= W UN - SPACE (L) LODGE -- sp22-7 FLOOR Lilli 931 SF 3,037 'F 18 1 n.- r d.i -* Un I .P .///ii rowland+broughton m SF BASEMENT Ll LODGE - 12Â»1, LEVEL 1 LEÂ· fl' F~GE 1521 4f/ .F ./.F (Al NF WI. archR~ctwe / urban destn / interlo, design 5.564 SF LODGE o SF NET LIVABLE 2753 SF 13617 SF LODCE 0 SF NET LIVABLE .115 g 1-4 5, .1 .1 ~, -r .1 '2 ~, r. ' 234 ehopkinsave 1830.ke st le 200 aspe/,co 81611 denver. co 80202 1,261 SF COMMERCIAL- 1.184 SF NET LEASABLE 1.904 SF COMMERCIAL- 1,818 SF NET LEASABLE 970 544 3473 f 303.308 1375 ' .r 7,602 Gr~t~q/ 4 â€¢,F L ~, 7 r,. Gf ~2~_L 970 544 9006 0 303,30513730 +2.231 2 Â·NON-UNIT SPACE +3 570 2 â€¢NON-UNIT SPACE d . 1) r 9~56 SF FLOOR AREA 19,091 SF FLOOR AREA 30 5F~ 4 ] 4. - MEE EXEMPT - i-U 1~4- 2=2 0 052 omitted lodge | iâ€¢,44,~ Â·.51 -i 12 ST 45096 crl â€¢ 11, W| r.1. ..r. r 'F 1 4 2 . \J] lili I. 104 SF added trash 112 - PARKING 5 222 SF L OF ......., .: 12 6. In'11111111]11 1 LODGE 1...53 ad.*R 6,452 IF COME ROO/AREA frorAL UNfLAREA . RASEMEND TonAL t:DE Â® 11111'q 'Ir - NON-UNIT -- - UNIT SPACE (WC) SPACE (L) 532 SF 287 SF -I'll ./.i ;2PI EXTERIOR STAIR Const,Mants: UNIT TOWERS ~56-\ ' v.,p=A_1.-~ / %.2 Ic) : 356% SPACE (L) 707,14 823 SF CO'11'MGAL FLOON AREA rECTAL UNTANEA Â· BASS*//77 1.599 SF \\M / 'I--WL.Ed,1 / -------- I -Â·- UNIT COMM LOBSY ./Â·I ""/AREÂ·. /k . - ..SEACE{L} 1,904 SF 1-jIT#Pti VAYMN] / 3516 sp 1.818 SFENET) COMM - L.1 -.F"F 1.261 SF *go*Will FLOOR AMEA {TOTAL MONALÂ»m AREA - SASE~END Tor,L 1.184 SF(NET) , -D --1 -nTAI .11 Â» 1/ ~up 4 Â·6 4 4, 1624 'Â·F Â© NON-UNIT EXTERIOR STAIR rorAL SPACE (UC) CATIOO,ny 3,570 SF TOWERS ---1-n,r'.P-&MnT- ROOM 874% 01)=3120 SF omitted 1-7 | IREA EXPOSURE AREA -UNCT 126%(C)=450'F 104 SF UNIT e @ SPACE (L) FAINT:k,r' 11+6 ARE I 45006 -4 -0 825 'F r .479 &/ . L I Â«Â· r., AE ...... S. f V. 4, DIA ./4 SPACE (L) 994 SF Plot Date. 7/13/2015 4 19'53 PM 593 SF UNIT- 72--S,4&&21 ---Â· ' 1.ill.5 - ,~fâ€¢,-IAL]=Â£14ECH 1.... Qi-k=Â¥-- iti -384.~T=t ~ 07.14.2015 DETAILED REVIEW APPLICATION LODGE - LODGE - 3.037 SF - 1037 SF LEVL2 LEYEL.3 12.590 SF LODCC o SF NET LIVABLE 7,602 SF LODGE 0 SFNET LIVABLE LODGE 3050 SF \ 6~5#W Vi 2.528 SF COMMERCIAL- 2,257 SF NET LEASABLE OSF COMMERCIAL- 0 SF NET LEASABLE 3050 SF +1 454 RE Â·NON-UNIT SPACE 22 2 Â·NON-UNIT E,PACE 7,602 SF FLOOR AREA 16,572 SF FLOOR AREA LimE omitted lodge ..in:Joil 104 SF COMM D.SE 1,046 SF 161 1 962 SF (NET) _ : NOT EXPOSED NOT EXPOSED UNIT AREA 1955 SF AREA 382 SF NON.UNIT LODGe"'" SPACE (L) Y/////////////////////////f//5///////88*8*Sm25*//g f, MUMA SPACE(UC) 2.750 SF 1.515 SF -ImID 1,454 SF 87 486 (L) = 1,271 SF - EXTERIOR STAIR Â® SOUT'H SPRING STREET (WEST ELEVATION) (~ SOUTH DIAGONAL 126% (C)=1835/ - TOWERS ~ - 1.1-it~ NOTEXPOSED NOT EXPOSED NOT EXPOSED B L_~-7L_rl--0-LI-L_J AREA 585 SF AREA 546 SF AREA 747 SF EXEMPT 1.388/F ~ ~ ~ EAST WALLS ~ SOUTH WALLS ~ EAST WALLS ommed COMM - 104 SF EXTER}OR STAIR 1,482 SF NOT EXPOSED NOT EXPOSED GARAGE DOOR TOWERS 1,295 SF (NET) AREA 375 SF AREA 894 SF EXPOSED AREA 144 SF *-Ii.' -I. Â® NORTH WALLS 0 EAST WALLS SKY HOTEL NOT EXPOSED ..3.4.,lilli â€ž2'. AREA 568 SF Â® NORTH WALLS 709 E. DURANT AVE. ASPEN. CO 81611 144 SF EXPOSED GARAGE DOOR / 6.196 SF WALL AREA = 023 OR 2 3% 9.056 SF BASEMENT ( 023) = 208 SE EQ221,8il d--~_r__3 OSF LODGE OSF NET LIVABLE 0 SF COMMERCIAL- 0 SFNETLEASABLE EXIST SUB GRADE BASEMENT WALL EXPOSURE SF CALCULATIONS 1 22 2 Â·NON-UNIT SPACE ] 0 SF FLOOR AREA 1 PROJECTNO 2140660 LEGEND LODGE "41:"4 . - COMMERICAL SHEET TITLE: EXISTING FLOOR t_~-1-UI~| RESIDENCE ..~ AFFORDABLE HOUSING A-- AREA CALCULATIONS OPEN TO BELOW >< SCALEÂ· 1-=50'-0 NON.UNIT SPACE (SHARED USE) EXEMPTIONS PDO.5e ' PEDESTRIAN AMENI. - DURANTAVE - :AM K * A - t# . 1 . Ill f. Â· -- - ~ mrchlectur..bal design t inter,or ri-ign 234 e hopkins ave 1830 blak, st ste 200 ___ rowland+broughton aspen. co 81611 denvef. co 80202 , r I. i_' u 2-1 2'- r-,1- t. .---t.. ...~2-7-,3 -'1 2 -2-~-2-'--Â·'~oUnua' 12222- -4 -____ M # 'I 970 544 9006 0 30310813730 970 544 3473 f 30330813751 FI-- &-8,77Â·0--~---"l~CAPE L 9I: . ' c, fl 1 PLAN TERS' SD 1 | PLANTERS J'. '. 1 -- M. 1.-or l- M - i MIN CIR -211 I I. U -. 4 5 3.- ,J I , 0-1 TO - 1 1,5 1:.2 I I-3. WRE 4 -: --- - - --- IN\\ & ~ [ h bl. I Consultants: \ 11 i rE r-- ----- -- xÂ·iff-ir -f] /1 - IS 11 UTILTY ' CHATEAU XFPMR , ' EXIT LL/ NEW I Be . 5 7 CHATEAU fE-Kif~L DUMONT CHAUMONT Â· Â· /31 (3 - STORY] (3 - STORE rrÂ· p 11.:.---,1-- It~ Â· -*I~--Â· 5 *ir .1..1.1.-:---~ 1- 41 - 1 1 - - <I 2 - â€¢ ,}fi i MÂ· /3 :6-/*~ 3 _ j X.- 1 8. 42.---- 4 Plot Date 7/13/2015 4 20 00 PM 43 i 3 n... Issue, ' ~i--124..1.5- 1 07.14,2015 DETAILED DE F = 18 -0~ _ r=i . 6 REVIEW 4 1 1184. MIN CLR 1 i 47 F J iÂ·~ F 3 = APPLICATION Â· T.-I Â· LUI- - F.,.EXIST PUNTR IF i ......Lâ„¢ i EXISTINGDUMONTPARKING i 'CELD -Ill.=- 0 1-71- : ..: -=3 It , 1, ---- - ---- -- - - 1.---...2.4.-1 z CE E-@22- T IF-0.1 r ~ ALLEY I 610 1 EAST SETBACK V'EST WING .1.- , I . 2-11 _ 15 4 ./1 I-/: ~~~ i PRgERTÂ¥/PE DN -4- g EXIT LfÂ·_ .--~- -1.Em:=1Â·~i-.3-'tp~%22 j RAISEDPLANTER :Â· ADA -2 : 1 ~44 1 - PLANTER- 1 1 1 11Â£-RAMp ., -.- ... 1 H Ig-*@*0 z EXIT TRASH/DELIVERIES EXIT 1 EAST IE- BACK EAST /ING GLORY HOLE CONDOMINIUMS F- NDE-Â·,a MAIN ENTRY / O -STORY) 1 :1 4'Â·..Â·2: - Â·'T , 1/.i --D.....Ill 0 -- 1-*b.:ter~ THE LITTLE ~1, 2 NELL HOTEL ~| | 5 ~ ,~ : i (4 Â· STORY) 1, 1 'A I I ' 1 1 SKY HOTEL - - PRIVATE i I 1 +All RESIDENCE iÂ· ' -1Â©6~:S STAIR UP TO , ...1 -- -- -- -- -- -- -- (2 - STORY] IEST SETBAC U.ouNGE/DECK 707 f 7-1 42 \03\ /4 k i / 709 E. DURANT AVE irA, â€ž L ASPEN~ CO 8161l A- E Â· -- -~ L. i 1 1 ---C Â·~ 1_ - 9 te>ftiou qÂ« /?I . of' .rj ALPS ACCESS/DRIVEWAY f, Â·33 ~0Â· 394 -1 : . if rfe -. 9- Â·Â·Â·Â·71*wf V ASPEN ALPS BUILDING (z - STORY] PROJECT NO "--Â· :Re,f 21406.60 SHEET TITLE PROPOSED SITE PLAN SCALE: 1/16 =1-0 PD1.1 LANDSCAP 00 DURANTAVE CEFULL .2 - rowland+broughton - -- architecea f u,ban de,ign/intenor design 2]4 i hopkins ave 1/3/blake st st. 200 134 aspen. co 81611 dm.,co 80202 970 S44 9006 0 303 308 13730 970 544 3473 f 303 3081375 1 44 9.1 il~ --' i '\ 51 31 1-1 01 !-3 r]1~7-'Â·-~2Â· A-.-'"---9.-,.~ . .--Z=---=r--- f~ lili Il Ild[ 1 , 1.--Â· . b., l' ----------, ~ r : ,} . ) 1$ 11.- ~. PLANTERS ~ , 4 4 ...1 .. 11 11 '1,1 lili 1111 1. Consultanti 12 M. 1.-0Â· tr= 1 1111 *1 MIN CLR 11 I V I -a DRIVEJ- = 1 2 TH.u S. Â·Il - -9.--4 9 31'Â·Â· / 2> 1 NEW i 11:rt.ir, \~2 1 ~@Fds ._ __ _ ELEC 1 ~ XURMR | / 1 %9 1. END k ... I L . -1 N-Mit - - -- - CHATEAU I < CHATEAU IiI 7 -- p.r ; i DUMONT CHAUMONT plot Date: 7/1372015 4.20.14 PM (3-S-ORY) 1 (3 - STORY) 5 2-1041- 1 1 1 07142015 DETAILED 1 -<81- I REVIEW I â€¢ lfÂ· 1 -1.31 . APPLICATION 1 1..... 21 1 .E 1 . 1110 1 0 -- Ir=lk :; , F -1 -P -1 - j -1 MIN CLR 1 d i i m ./ .:-- Ul - --__ ~ i EXIST PLNTR CE . EXISTING OUMONT PARKING /- ~ " Â· U. ~ Â·- 1 i EXIST UTILITY 0 : Â· - 0 1 -r El' 1-1 .1- -1 5 -- I -- - - ALLEY : 1 1... 2 - VT[44 .- ~1 :I Â· ~- 6 14 1 _u 4 11: mt w- - . Â§3 - Â·Â· BOAES I C--- 0 li I - -11 1 Z lili I EAST SET I,CK /Â·EST WING ..Ji, Min- ON /1 I 0 i- 0 EXIT -43.-4 Â·.:Â· Â·Â·Â· Â· ,<UNDERSROUND[ 7 - gâ€žÂ· -# m 4.- -__ _~_. --3Â»zp."Â· k,2.1-1 1- E-PLA'-32*2 : L.-- GR//SL VAN, 7~.....Â· b!G - - RAISFD #LANTER Â·_;.AMP Â· 1- ~~~1 di . - 1, - Â·Â· - SIDEWALK-1/-[Nl RAMPON 5IDEWALâ€¢ 21' /' '~ -1, - 1. 6 1 1 -- -- -- -- -- ....6- _ _ Â· _rÂ·",--rÂ·-1==~--r---m=:n:==~- w L.=E=.=01 2= 6'-5~ EXIT TRASHDELIVERIES EXIT EAST SE- BACK EAST Â·'VING | 972.- - f . GLORY HOLE CONDOMINIUMS 5 (3 Â· STORY) 11 4 -4 MAIN ENTRY P ' I ' a. ..4 1 Â· S , Â· 1 0 17.-7-2.Â·01 E 1 Â· THE LITTLE li - 1 NELL HOTEL (4-STORY) r, , 1. 1-g ~ L-- SKY HOTEL J i. I 1..1 f..t..VyÂ¢1.0 PRIVATE 709 E. DURANT AVE. RESIDENCE ASPEN, CO 81611 ;3' 0- kâ‚¬~ ~ STIR UP TO , ...1.--1 -r1 ,-1.-4 -- -- -- -- r-r--1 1--1. (2 - STORY) WEST SETBACK~Â·bOUNGE/DECK L __ 1 \7 1 le; PARKIÂ¥G 1 ALPS PARKING \ ~ (3 qAGONAV , (3 DIAGONAL) r - - E Â« 11 . ' @r -- --L.. .- 1 .L --- 1 11.-. ALrS PARKING ~5 PARAL,EL) \ 1 .... - 1?rQI'* ALPS ACCESS/DRIVEWAY -- li.-7-+ w r NS- - - -Â· Â·r- ~ - Â·â€¢e.~ :v I H Â«*.pow / .5 Â«GUI69~ :# -.:~ / ..... -0 fe>52,/-~be#. - ( PROJECT NO 21406.60 ASPEN ALPS *~~\4-' t:.61~61'<4M.74, 0 BUILDING SHEET TITLE {2 STORY) PROPOSED SITE PLAN 0 -OPTION B L. L SCALE..1/16 = 11-0. PD1.lb - iF OVelE I 3/3H , r--ANSI COMPLIANT RAMP/CURB CUT rowland+broughton le'l, / echaecture/ urban daE:gn / tnte,10, de,ign 234 e hopkins ave 1830 blake 51 st, 200 ANSI COMPLIANT RAMP/CURB CUT--1 1-1 970 544 9006 0 303 308 13730 1 1 - ..1 r--C]TY PEDESTRIAN f\ -pen . 81611 dem.e~, co 80202 970 544 347. 303308 1375 1 1 ~ WALKWAY t4==1 lifÂ·2429>*%Â·%*72Â·5>X<Â·Â»RÂ·1*XWN<ZN~i~fR 1 -- 'F Â·-27 '-Â¥ 1 - - -Er -7-T-2 --t . / 1.9 I J Â· + i 2% Consullam 1 1 i - -i 1 - 1 ACCESSIBLE EXIT Plot Date 7/13/2015 4 20:20 PM 155.I ACCESSIBLE ROUTE TO 07.14.2015 DETAILED / PUBLIC WAY REVIEW APPLICATION MIN ACCESSIBLE ROUTE FROM PUBL[C WAY TO BUILDING ~ ~~----~ ~ ~~~~~ ACCESSIBLE ROUTE T ENTRANCE r PUBLIC WAY ANSI COMPLIANT- RAMP/CURB CUT ~*~ EXIT - ExIT EXIT ACCESSIB-E ENTRY/EXI- ' 1 : SKY HOTEL ENTER 709 E. DURANT AVE. , ASPEN, CO 81611 ADA RAMP/FLUSH LANDING CONTINUATION OF PUBLIC . ' SIDEWALK TO SECOND FLOOR ~ i' ." it= 1.--l' 1 1,~ / ,_1-2 <r f N TERRACE/PUBLIC ACCESS :-r 11Â«111Â«111 11 7/.3/] ( .1 9 (9 42 5 1,\ \\ \\ \\ \ i i \\\ 1 \1\fif k \\Â»- ADA RAMP/FLUSH LANDING--Â·~-~ZIE~[ :.4 / \ - 2/ 1/0 ANSI COMPLIANT RAMP/CURB CUT U % 11 PROJECT NO 2140/60 DESIGNATED PEDESTRIAN > WALKWAY ~ I " SHEET TITLE SITE ACCESSILBILITY PLAN ANSI COMPLIANT RAMP/CURB CUT PLAN TRUE , I NORTH NORTH 08 ALE: 1/16" =1'-0 < 1 ~ P01.2 -Site Accessibility Plan ~01.2) SCALE 1..= 1-0 PD1.2 . 1 â‚¬'/rÂ·'i '7:1 r 1 - i~,1 111 . y Fl FISTING PUBLIC Ar,ENITY SPACf 1.536 st DURANT AVENUE 297 I 690 sf 1.2373f Uki 3,760/TOTAL (15 6%) rowland+broughton 1\\\\ archftecee / urt,an detign / interior dies@gn 234e hopkins ave 1830 blake st ste 200 11\11\ aspen,co 81611 denver, co 80202 970 544 9006 0 303 30813730 :\\\\\ 970.544 3473 f 303 308 1375 f 11\\11 PROPERTY LiNE ~ -9-1 - - --- 'P-~ as~-1 21. EXISTING PUBLIC /24 - Consultants AMENITY SPACE - - 1.53:ESP / =1 / Â» .EN' ~ _ =- DUMONT CHAUMONT \9 -9 - CHATEAU CHATEAU 9* P - - (3 -STORY) (3-STORY) Piot Date. 7/13~2015 4 20.22 PM A I ls,ue LLI Ul 07.14 2015 DETAILED REVIEW EXISTING PUBLIC APPLICATION AMEN'11*seACE - CL U) 01// r -1 . : 1 Â· LITTLE + = NELL I *-41 4=-2 ' HOTEL E_EXISTINGPUBUC ~ ~\ D f -x ALLEY AMENITY SPACE (4-STORY) 297 SF I. 4. -, PROPERILINE / I. I. I. \ 1 1 /-0.--1. 1---- . 1 3 ----- LÂ»-4 GLORY HOLE i___1 l---1 1__-3 --=1 Il Il 1 1 1 CONDOMINIUMS 1 1- 0 -STORY) IE EXISTING SKY HCMEL IE --- L---- 709 E. DURANT AVE SKY HOTEL 1--- L I IM .1 l_-1 / , PRIVATE ASPEN. CO 81611 lit - -- 1----1-------------11 N . L.... 01â€¢9!64 4. , RESIDENCE Â¥ ILL-///0//Aluaâ€ž,0/I,~, IPOOLPARD / 2 EXISTINGPUBLIC r~--=="' U El/ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ 1 \ \ r2 - STORY) AMENITY SPACE -Â·T - -- â€¢ 1,237 SF "opp ity 1 INF i \ 4% 13 1 1 1 \U ~~ f ADJ GRADS 1) \ \ \ 11 1\ 1\ I \ \ 1 \\\ ! 1 11,/ /0 crrh\\I//. ALPS ACCESS/DRIVEWAY ,rd -= k- Â·~' 00, ~'~ ~~ //61 ~..p>==,1*=dirE[-fEEzloi*=iÂ»===412<~ttlilllimi-~224*4~L_- i'lmr // PROJECT NOÂ· 9 9-6 b 6 1 U '00 Â° .4:3</1. / j ASPEN ALPS 1 â‚¬3===6 0/ ; / 21406 60 ij j Jig (2 - STORY) BUILDING 100 '041/6- EXISTING PUBLIC AMENITY SPACE PLAN | \ I ' 1/ /4 -. SHEET TITLE. , //1\ , f 6 PLAN TRUE SCALE: _1/16"= 1'-0 ------_-<~~~1~ AMENiT'7 ACE ~ ~ PD1.3a - 13 . PROPOSE.D PUBLIC AMENITY SPACE ,!r STREET LE'uEL AREA 3.430 S F_TCTAL rowland+broughton afc.eces; u,ban 664..eno, design >:SP==1.-Â»41 4-_1 234 e hopkins ave 183/blak' st ste 200 .~\ 7 1 970 544 9006 0 303 3081]730 %\ asp0~.co 81611 dâ€¢r,ver, co 80202 1 ' - \ \41 970544 3473 f 303 305 1375 f PROPOSED PUBLIC IL__5 -PROPOSED pUBLIC AMENITYSPACE ' .--2/1 1-1=-- - -__- -_.-...._------ AMEN]TY SPACE Y, w 2,575 SF - 1 -- --7, T/- / 855 SF -- SIDEWALK ' --441444,i- Mii,-17;1-t j i i. ti'i-ti-- 1 - -2%499/22Â«/2/5 Consultants: 1 f m U -R 9 - 18 l . 10 .3 4111 1 -7 4.i \ i DUMONT CHAUMONT Plot Date 7/13/20154:20.23 PM rb - 15 4 07.14,2015 DETAILED CHA1'EAU CHATEAU (3 - STORY] , . s./In Issue. r.2 = Â·-1 / L REVIEW ' APPLICATION W Ii. //41 - In 0 r/9 1 1- 7 2 1% P J 1 1 1 V,-4 1 - -OFERTYUMe I 1 PLANTER 1 FBI | PLANTER ! h, ., 0 SIDEWALK ON' 1 SIDEKII - -- -- -- -- -- -- ---rn-r~'Il .--*--' Â»*Â»- GLORY HOLE /3. STOR' ' CONDOMIN juMs 4 3 THE LITTLE ~i i NELL HOTEL :/1. . 9 (4.STORn ~ SKY HOTEL PRIVATE 709 E. DURANT AVE RESIDENCE ASPEN, CO 81611 -- (2 - STORY) â‚¬ I I b H~,mrful. 1 ALPS ACCESS/DRIVEWAY ff /2/ PROJECT NO ' 21406 60 Â« I. 1 7 1\\0 ./ Â»lt. '- ser \ 1 ASPEN ALPS -7-1 9 BUILDING - - 4 (2 - STORY) SHEETTITLE PROPOSED PUBLIC O AMENITY SPACE PLAN SCALE. 1/16" = 1-0" 0-JLJL_-7 PD1.3b E. SOUTH SPRING STREET \".0..r:71.8-. *-7 149 '' 4 .4,'- ~2 PROPOSED PUBLIC AMENITY SPACE STREET LEVEL AREA : 11 1 .r i. 1 - 1,1, 3,430 SF SLB TOTAL 2nd LVL PA-10 1,362 SF 4.792 SF TOTAL rowland+broughton architecture / u,t an design / int.ier design 234 0, hopkins ave 1830/lake st. ste, 200 aspen. co81611 deliver. co 80202 97054490060 303.308 13730 970 544.3473 f 303 308 1375 f PRO,EMTYLI~ DECK ~| 1 DECK â€¢E- U j Consul~nts: 0 - DRIVE THRU I E- -la I 1 CHATEAU CHATEAU === DUMONT CHAUMONT Plat Date 7/13/2015 4:20:24 PM (3-STORY) (3 -STIR'O 07 14.2015 DETAILED - P. 31% REVIEW APPLICATION LE En I I E | ALLEY 1 ROOFIELOW 2 DECK. JL_._ DECK I F GLORY HOLE CONDOMINIUMS (3 - STORY) THE LITTLE - NELL HOTEL I li 0 -STIR',0 ~~ SKY HOTEL z_nxr~~6-~ PRIVATE 709 E. DURANT AVE RESIDENCE ASPEN, CO 81611 - - -- -- I -- --Â· 1 /72 .. ZIKa Ilti-u4j%F_~_-223 DECK- n 4-'DECK 1 (2 - STORY) , /7 //*21 PROPOSED PUBLIC AMEN]TYSPACE 210 LEVEL PADO A 1.362 IF PMOP91â„¢UNE f 1 ALPS ACCESS/DRIVEWAY /3 /Ct. - W -~ 1 1. / PROJECT NO: \ 1 21406 60 Ntt I / ASPEN ALPS V BUILDING (2 Â· STORY) SHEETTITLE PROPOSED PUBLIC AMENITY SPACE PLAN _IL-JL_]1__1- SCALE. 1/16" =1'-0" PD1.3c ~NatcÂ·11'J, El'323121..1 PROPâ‚¬Ilr~UNE SOUTH SPRING STREET 00 PROPOSED PUBLIC AMENITY SPACE 2 2/14/. STREET LEVEL AREA 3.430 IF SUB TOTAL 2nd L.Vt PArlo 1,362 SF PUBLIC ROOF DECK 6,575 SF Tâ€¢.TAL 11.357/1 -OTAÂ£111/QI rowland+broughton NET LOT A REA: 24,001 SF architeege //&/ de. ign/ trt.. das:gn 234 8 hopki~, ave 1830 blake st ./ 200 aspen,co 81611 denver. co 80202 970 544 9006 0 30] 308 13730 970 544 347. 303 300 13751 PROPERTYLI. Consultan' /11 04*EL]=UIL Â«=7-1-2 CiIATEAU CHATEAU DUMONT CHAUMONT P!0( Date 7/1/2015 4Â·20.26 PM [3 ISTOR'O (3 - STORY) 0714.2015 DETAILED /0 -y 1 2-9 ** 32 1 41 1 PE En E *91 42 2=Ely=-I 11/POOL LOUNGE / O 5- U REVIEW - ~~IECKINV~/ 1110: APPLICATION !1 111 lili -1//4 42 *22:1 -- ALLEY POOL _ I ---- ::53%%3 ~ope*TruME -'2/Z.,LAL ---- -- Illj~ 331 25544 IS-I -4---- -462~ 1 1119 1 ////// ~\824 -- -- Ny== 2=27 e i' 7//:I- Lfi_.. GLORY HOLE CONDOMINIUMS 1 PER* 1=210,9rr4551Z! Â·8 1 Â·'ImÂ· -53Â»10307 --1~~ 1 -1--1 1 (3 - STORY) 1. Fil/1.i G~ARDRAI).M=_I /1 1 1"/V///1 - . THE LITTLE PROPOSED PUBLIC AMENITY SPACE ~1 PLANTER 1/// 11 11 00 LoiNGAECK AREA / / 00 NELL HOTEL PUBLIC ROOF DECK 02 0 g j ----\ (4 - STORY) 8,575 SF 00 SKY HOTEL =au h / H // I .//////IR - - - 1 PLANTER ---------------Â» i r ,-Ill-las*226,718 Â· 1 2 -F~/~0>954 OVERROOF ~~ SPA !1 PRIVATE 709 E. DURANT AVE. 1 '024-91 -- ------ - -- . Fl==-1------. -\ 1 1 - RESIDENCE ASPEN, CO 81611 (2-STORU / ALPS ACCESS/DRIVEWAY 44> 2 Uke\ - le PROJECT NO , 2140660 \/ \2 \ . ASPEN ALPS re v BUILDING (2 -STORN) SHEET TITLE PROPOSED PUBLIC AMENITY SPACE PLAN SCALE. 1/16" =1'.0 7 -111- J L J L J L. 1-7 PD1.3d OtaRoop SOUTH SPRING STREET PROPER. UNE 3,Ir, Al:Ado. LIZE= . rowland+broughton 234 ehopkin~ave 1530 blak~ ,t ste 200 V 4. /7....23.-7--23Â»V.1 1 1 \ 1 970 544 9006 0 30330813730 970 544 3473 f 303 308 1375 1 demer. co 80202 4 -- 1,1 '-/ ...----- - I---------- ------ Â·---------- -..~ ~& - --- --g 1 i 111 111.4 6 1 IT'â€¢-1 1 ~ . ~~ PLC, ITER '~ -- t PLANTERS Consultants -- A 11Â« I P-* i L\- - 2 11 -11 â‚¬ Â·.2-LANDSCAPE AREA - SNOW STORAGE AREA ~~ ~ ~ ~ SNOW STORAGE/SNOW SHEDDING NOTES: 1 ,-- j --,-;Â·.,r I - --m- - 1 ALL SLOPED ROOF AREAS {DESIGNATED SNOWFENCE AREAS BELOMWILL Ar |1 111 RETAIN SNOW WITH SNOWFENCES AN/OR CLIPS HAVE GUTTER & DOWNSPOW I I 1 - 4- Fel & L = AREAS AS DESIGNED 41 9 ' . 3 ALL DECK AREAS HAVE IN-SLAB SNOWMELTED REGIONS OTHER AREAS NOT 111-Â·Â·~ 3 u, E UTiLITY u 2 ALL FLAT ROOFS AND PLANTERS WILLIETA]N SNOW AS DESIGNED. SNOWM ELTED W4LL SE MAINTAINED/SHOVE LE D ONTO SNOWMELTED REGIONS 4. ALL LODGE UNIT PRIVATE FLAT DECKS WILL HAVE IN.SLAB SNOWMELT 5 SIDEWALKS DENOTED AT SNOWMELTED ARE IN-SLAB TUBE RADIANT HEATING 1 . 0/ - NK .5 1 CONNECTED TO CENTRAL SYSTEM, CONTROLS FOR TEMPANDMOISTURE 6. LANDSCAPED AREAS WILL ACT AS SNOW STORAGE AREAS -- 17, ~ Plot Date.7/1/2015420.35 PM 1 1 11, 'E71 m REVIEW ' ' Â«mhitectue / urban design / ~tanor 6652gn .1 . â‚¬ .a-" Ii.y~ER j'Â· -f 1 / 1 4 W '* - ---------- 1 1 <.1 0 02 11 Z TO COLLECT AND DISPENSE WATER, HEAT TRACE WILL BE INSTALLED AT SPECH'IC tg-7 _ -_ ~~ ~ . CLUSNER , : ],sue 07.14.2015 DETAILED 1 /_z: .: t APPLICATION - *- + & 1 i 31-i.= -- - ~. PROPERTY LINE . --Ii- - 1-L .i- -r=-I N--I L ~ r ~. ALLEY PLOWED~NO MANTAINEDAS EX]SING | JJ I PROPERTY LINE ..~"F>3*i PLANTER, SNOW STORAGE AREA PLANTER E*51 --y '7-'./. Vt#+H+++811 / 1-/ i l~Â·l i .tU -t t.Lun Ull i .dmtmm f n J J 11'-4 111-411 -' EXIT TRAS/DELIVERIES EXIT PUBLIC SIDEWALK /1 4929 (SNOWMELTED) ~.1 fr-33 / MAIN ENTRY 1 11 49* i 11- ~-j 54~ 4 1 9,/b E- -- r,,7///0, 1:= I L SKY HOTEL 11 9 1 709 E. DURANT AVE. / ASPEN, CO 81611 SNOWMELTED 1 - -1.-4 - 1 --1.-- -- -- H- -- -- ;; _4 --1--1 ---, AREA----Â·Â·.........~~~~0 s p/..fl EXISTING ALPS PARKING MAINTAINED AND PLOWED LA Q r \2 4 Nul GARAGE SNOWSTORAGEAREA : 9 \0 4 LANDSCAPE AREA. Â· F-Â« ENTRY t- \\ U.--: i l ' ~ ~~ ~~~_ - -- -- - - PROPERTY LiNE 7/ /91-1 -- - - #4* l * 14Â¥ X 9.9-L--2?41-hoth\.''f/ /,7, PROJECT NO 62 ..5....C ... I 2140660 SHEETTITLE -- SNOW STORAGE & 0 SNOW SHEDDING I/ 1. 1 1,[ 11'J " 1=W==11 ,-Oil I 1 3 tii jlit V/ o PLAN PLAN TRUE NORTH NORTH SCALE: 1/16" = 1'-0" L J L ~ r 1 ) POL Levell Snow Storage Plan ma SCALE 1/15- = 1-0 PD1.4 ,â‚¬29,0 $3 LANDSCAPE ARFA ,'f .1-,; i ,[ WALK Â·Â· . ; i j IEE] Â· Â· vawv 3dfg'DSONV1 rowland+broughton archancture/urbmn design/inDerier design 2348 hopkinsave. 1830'lakest ste 200 aspenice 81611 denver.co 80202 970544 90OG o 30330813730 970 544 3473 f 303.305 1375 f PROPERIY UNE **41 E-LEES--22-*PE-*904524 ConsullintiÂ· t.fl 23---3---:EE--7 ----- - SNOWSTORAGE/SNOWSHEDDING NOTES 1 ALL SLOPED ROOF AREAS (DESONATED SNONFENCE AREAS BELII4Bj1Lk RETAIN SNOW WITH SNOWFENCES AND)/OR CLLPS HAVE GUTTER & DOWNSPOUTS E " 1 7 Ill - TO COLLECT AND DISPERSE WATER HEAT TRACE WILL BE INSTALLED AT SPEC FIC L- f ~i_- |FVME ~- AREAS AS DESIGNED 2 ALL FLAT ROOFS AND PLANTERS W~LL RETAiN SNOW AS DESIGNED 3 ALL DECK AREAS HAVE INÂ·3~AB SNOWMELTED REGIONS. OTHER AREAS NOT SNOWMELTED WILLIE MAINTANEDBHOVELED ONTO SNOWMELTED REGIONS .t tr-1-Â·~. -/ 4 ALL LODGE UNIT PRIVATE FLAT DECKS WELL HAVE IN -SLAB SNOWMELT Z M Plot Dale 7/1~2015 4.20.37 PM 92 / w Issue: 07.14.2015 DETAILED REVIEW APPLICATION 4** 9 0 7-2 p n F J 1. 1 1 PROPERTY LINE -- LI- /1 SNOWMELTED AREA AS SHOWN WITH CROSS HATCH PATTERN, -IZUâ€žÂ· POOL . - . --~1_ / ~ OTHER DECK AREAS NOT SNOWMELTEDWILL BE SHOVELED INT' SNOWMELTLw....wÂ·u I ./. 1-551 PROPFRTY 1 INF ~~â„¢~U'PE--f/ UZ--7 SPA - ' ELEV I "718 ~ I 1 188& 1 \ 9Â»0 - 1 ;7 lili - ....11 ~./.~~~~~//~ -7 1;E~ '1 I -ILJ- Mir/0 + i-1 , I RAISED DEC-rEE l.--.r.,. 9Â·,t.L M!1 n 1 1 Immr- 4 E Mi l w -- 411 '1 - -Cr - unÂ· d F"""1| 'iÂ· S. / L---- .Â« -ju E-1 4'-1-~ ~179 ~11 1 E-~ 4~ L' ~| ~- ~1_~ ~ ~ ~-_ SKY HOTEL ~*42 -f -1 1-- 1 I--2-=-11 0 -, I f-Z-27=I--I [ cÂ¢* ri~3 95 9 G--11 L...1- 49Â»d r--71[vl[ .. 1 - 11. r.- \1 4 - lili E--1 -- ==gall'lill';1111111;0.4~11; 1 ; 7 26'J~ '14%11 709 E. DURANT AVE. ASPEN, CO 81611 24*23-5- 2,9*i**Gl-a-- -j-EE_in~--,~4~90%01*1~~6-- V//X .A 2 -2=222-_ - Â· . A PROPERâ„¢ LINE / 904,3 Ce ef 1 AF PROJECT NO 21406.50 / / 1 V SHEETTITLE: SNOW STORAGE & m SNOW SHEDDING u PLAN 1 PLAN TRUE NORTH NORTH SCALE: 1/16Â·Â· = 1-0" ( 1 j p015- Roof Level Snow and Shedding plan ma PD1.5 ~PD1.5/ SCALE .. ..1 -0 L /'r,â‚¬ ,â€¢ Â·7.n I U. .. ..1 - k PROPERTY LINE râ€¢ rowland+broughton architecture lutban deign / inâ„¢,ior dBSign .S , 234 e hopkins ave 1830 blakest ste 200 aspe'.co 81611 der,vel. co 80202 970 544 9006 0 303 30813730 970544 3473 f 303 308 1375 ' PROPEE~UNE 4 STAFF STAFF ,- --- -h~ -- -/R.'SFiWI RR'SHWR- - 3:-sm.a- -- - --'-L --- --n I i 149" IIi lilli 11 FINANCE FINANCE ~ ~ - ~ ' Consu ants STAFF 11 . ]I 'IDIR. H. I OFFICES SAFE HR '20 ~ WCKERS LIWLIh__11[h RECORDS |~~ CORRIDOR h U HIUrr ~ ~ LAUNDRY lili I IM-MI 1 2 HSKP/LINEN 2_ ~ -= 9m O WOMEN'S EMP.OYEE VII uptÂ®11#% D'ING -47MJR;4- ~ ST*Rl; E-1/ 0 10101010~. ~ 1 A-J TV ~ COOLER 1 Issue MEETING 1 PRE.FUNCTION Plot Date- 7/13/2015 4.20.38 PM 07.14,2015 DETAILED ROOMS spAc E i REVIEW APPLICATION M'~t,-13 COOLINC 0 P.62 TOWER m .- 1| MECHANICAL I . m - v i C ~1 q E MICH , 5-32 044 5 -0, MECH/ELEC/UTILIY titfjl *1[i|El-Â·=I, ,li,,i,l,,ltll'111 1,111111 1.91'e,2.,1.1 1-1-1-1 11 1-1 11111111111111111111 1 LOCKERS ~ ~ 1 ~111111111111 1111111111111111 1111111111111 It WIll 111,111 37 -3 1 !-12-1 =4 ELEV. Â· 1 ' '- STAIR 2 1 -7 E l 13NCES 1 1 IT 1 0 .3 - 1 -3/. / v =1 1 1 1 , E Â· Â· 2-11 3 STACKED a F +ARKING: PACES 1/PAC' PNGV PARLING SICES PARKING 1 f~~ pANGE~ GARAGE 54 TOTAL PARKING SPACES 1 ~ SKY HOTEL 1 C " ll' 1 -1 1 1 1 1 15 PAR INC IP-,CES . i 1 L:J i 709 E. DURANT AVE. UP 91 1 13 ASPEN, CO 81611 -131+41=Ma ,%'7 /.6. F --- ---4-~'Â·-h 11 51Â«08 Â¢GWALL ~-- I l \ \ \ 11\ \ \ ~ PARKIN 3 SPACE S 'f \ \ \ EXIS.N.PARKING'.oVE 'g \ .<3*100 1 /4 ) Lh \ ' 'l' ' ' '' ~~-4.E 1 \ 43%4 1//#19 / 04Â·,-1 44~\40/-Â»> U..,& PROJECT NO: 21406.60 / V SHEET TITLE LEGEND 1-1 ,Â®GE BASEMENT Ll FLOOR PLAN O PuaLICS,ACeCOMMONA~EA i PLAN TRUE ~ COMMERCIAL..EA NORTH NORTH SCALE: 1/16" = 1'-0" < 1 ~ PD2.0 - Basement Ll Plan na CO CPD2.01 SCALE 1/16-it'-0- PD2.0 O *%. 81 V i. 5 k I WI H ~ )#-- ij ABO~ Dul 10~NG~W*EL ~ -1 38!IUMadO~id ~u-i.*.-â€¢ ~*iattsâ€¢a.=â€¢Taâ€¢ rowland+broughton .'. in architecture / urban design / interior design '05, TPâ„¢ y .PDS 1 1 234 e hopkins ave, 1830 blake st ste.200 aspen. co 81611 denver. co 80202 T 970544 9006 0 303.3081373 0 070 914 3473 f 303.308 1375 f PAOPERTY LINE E--- ~ -- -I~~~Rgf~WIR- Â·- ------ --~0<VeLL- ---- -- ' 1 14-9 ConsultantsÂ· I:= bU40..:ES FINANCE =1&: . 7-7 - RECORDS CORRIDOR ..1 1 HR/IT ~~ ~ LAUNDRY I ~ ~_ ~ HSKPaLINEN d EMP.OYEE El wo~EN'S UL'P#lwwl 4 0-_t-r-::wm 01 -O - Â·Â·bur*r- o lolololoil 52 j STAIR 1~ I 67 TV ~~ _J -7 WALK IN Plot Date 7/13/2015 4.2039 PM ~// COOLER | Issue. MEETING 1 PRE-FUNCTION FITNESS | 07.14.2015 DETAILED ROOMS SPACE REVIEW APPLICATION ~ MENS <1 IFCOOLINC 61-101 0 TOWER 'er=, M -. || MECHANICAL - 1 11 :All ELECTRICAL 1 - 1-IE] te,y & ~ Â¢ %: 8 - WoÂ· L 'FE'ITT- V 1% 11 r-.INEOF'UILDING'804 _19-1 MECH/ELE/UTILITY --7 F .---------- --------A ------------Â·-----------9/ 41----1--- --El PROPER~ U. SNOINGWALL . i A.h ~ El.Al~11111111|1111|1111 1/111111 1Â©,1-,â€¢11'11'11'11'111'111'111 lilli ' 1 L--1 -; ------------------ -------72*Ef:-------------------- #11111111111 11111111111~111 1 il 111111 11111{1 1 111 11Â¢11 1 ELEV. - STAIR 2 LOBBY | +LEÂ·+ El ~ ~/ a ELN. I !1 1 1. I 1 1 6if 11*==i , 1 OFACE v I 8 TANI EM E TANIER ' 5 f 14'KING e FACES 1 SPA.1 /fl PARK]NG PARING SP,â€¢CES 3,1 1 - I = 1 jv~ ~*El i GARAGE 70 TOTAL PAR/NG SPACES SKY HOTEL -1 J 30 TANDE,1 PARK qG SPAC ES 'SPACE 709 E. DURANT AVE. UP UNE.-OWA*. ASPEN. CO 81611 U -3 1 41 .*ERAT~ \ 1 / 1 U 5 PIRKING ~ PARKJIGSPADIS P 11 . ./In-- - 11_-2 1\' W h ~X, WORKSHF/ ~ 'A / //0.- - --- . ./.E..._ '' _ - I- _ \ e i i i '' -~41' LIN~ \DAÂ»...phil Nk:.1,// Â«eâ‚¬z--.0-.905#~ \~ 04 2730.1/0 PROJECT NOÂ· -43%=es>* 21406.60 /0/ SHEET TiTLE: LEGEND BASEMENT Ll FLOOR I~ a;MUC SPAC.COMMON AREA PLAN - OPTION B | NORTH NORTH 0 CO-*AREA PLAN TRUE PDZ.OB - Basement Ll Plan - Option B 82 SCALE: 1/16" -1-0" S SCALE 1/157= 1-0' PD2.Ob S m FOR H INC' ~ A A - PDS 1 0i ~2 5-0' , NEOPBUELING 311/11.d OW. 6-4â€¢ C==n 'f/4 L--~ -- -zz~ rowland+broughton architecture / urban design/int'ior de~gn 1 7 EL, 9/M 3 1\ V 234 e. hopkinsave. 1830 biake st. ste. 200 aspen. co 81611 denverco 80202 6 .19\\ ..LE.,92-'29\ 970 544 90060 303 308.13730 Â£~2 970.544.3473 f 303 308 1375 f li 14 ~~'00 0 00 0 3,43*f-Â·'-Â·-Â«9--9.-i-2 --Â·2-r.... 'Itn ConsuHantsÂ· 1 1/X \ lita=.1 1' 314 . L I .2 -111 1 ,Â« 4 ------F/AJE 1. KINTERs 1 ~U v ,%< 11}1 I #-~ 0.1 ijial 1 #4.1-1-1] =E [ill[El L= ELI 3 DRIVE THRU / r---' . 1. 0.-1 - 1 / 1 (F : tifip 42~ 6--I E ICS-4 5Â°13 I X\ 1 14 1574-1.-2 1 ~ lEN ~ ~-ff~--j~~ \ /11 k in-, . /.9 FRMIL- ====-==3:igwr v Â©g Wlle |~/11 HALL U' 11 pall-Eb CHATEAU CHATEAU --- --0 E-1 fr 7 456 31Â«Ent...1Â· DUMONT CHAUMONT Plot Date: 7/13~2015 4:20.53 PM \ / \4 - ,=tu--- 7.-. L--IUGE lk/. CARR= Issue: LODGE (3-STORY) (3 - STORY] 7 1 1Â«1 0 6 urrr BUNK) ~~ ~ @ 07.142015 DETAILED - 1- - e i APPLICATION 4.44 7 , I knan E-71 Crl .: 1 14 REVIEW \ 1 , .1 102 -- ~~U i Â»3--~ - * __ ~ ~ ~ ==11 ./02, 0 73 gif ...1 L 241 - F -1 - UNIT 1-=#INE ETT173' 6 11 I EXISTING DUMONT PARKING 1 1 Ililli 1.-,1 A.... GE It,NUI nÂ©Â«32 111,7=:*,In, 9 1 sALES ~ 1~1 -1 --rM-.2#, L :1 .11. 9 r// OFFICE kiEli*E 1 ALLEY 1120 V 31 Rsva 23:*= ~ Il 0 . :1 â€ž11 SALES \â€ž, E ./PER.INE IN râ€ž_ 4-- 4-7.-1 -h -~M 1 ----2---1Â¢UNUEIÂ·IGNOUNDI---Â·.-'--7-. '1.- , 1,-1.'' ...~.it ,~2 -., " -~ 1,.â€ž. -. %.L.'.~. , 2.-, -1~â€ž-1 -. .-% ~27=rtic L .1 11Â°"fASFVAI,IT'| 'Â·-2 Â·~,- --5-1- - . -- - - ~PIANTER-----94Â·~13tk--PLANTER-- 1 Â·1~--Â·-7 -,7.-SIDEWA-KÂ· ~- '36,7-UCR.U,IP-ON. 7-- -s- --- -7----Er- --Eâ€ž- -1--- SIDEWALKE-1 9 -Â·- --7--~7- ai . .1 11,1 Â· 11 1%. '1 ' _ )4:-<4-~ ' DN.~~~L GLORY HOLE | J-~ ~~~ 0'~ LO/Y 1 V VV 2 56:Sllr-21-1 LS'EI I-309 - 2 '8ULL -i)-.10 (B~~~|â„¢~~~" f /9 |Â£40/1 - (3 -STORY) 42) -__CznD ' r-__1 - 80RM ~57 1 CHEW .1 ON UP CONDOMINIUMS ADU' BORM 14.-I /1 11 1 7-Elr FOFF=u p- a --- 41 -11 1 ILY ~ELEV. 1| OFFICES e_--k, 3221 - A Mi,1 9/Â» &/Lai#gj STIR 2 THE LITTLE f Â· - : t.2- 6@~ LOUNGE ABOVE CORRIDOR NELL HOTEL ./-.. (4 - STORY] LINEOF 42~' ~Â· Â· ~' RECEPTION & '112 e--0 CE 3/ .. M CE D C~ __J W I ~ SKY HOTEL FOUNDATION -~- 2-2 L W 6& 4:2 , ' ' U WALL BELOW-0 SKI Lf [715 [f] Luf L EV [-] 147 [-1 'ti-P J 'Il rl LODGE LODGE LODGE LODGE LODGE m -- I.- hc 1 130 1 odip n [ILIk <*131 -4EE u U D [CE Â» L PRIVATE | 709 E DURANT AVE. RESIDENCE i ASPEN, CO 81611 41 1 SPECIAL (2Â· STIRE Â·Â· EVENT - o (f~.ffÂ©- ir)(30 n .d~le.imÂ· i SPACE iff ff / 03 \24\ EXISTI!~LF~'r' 1--al , \ ,/ n ----1 - ' # 1 *P=.UNE \ 1 1 \ i \ \ i'-1-1. ... 9 1 - 9 1 1 ALPS ACCESS/DRIVEWAY 0-- t. // /- 00 / PROJECT NO: / 21406.60 ASPEN ALPS BUILDING LEGEND .$'. fy.- -58 1 (2 - STORn / SHEET TITLE: -- / / LEVEL 1 FLOOR PLAN .,0 /0 / i PLAN TRUE i > NORTH SCALE: 1/16" = 1'-0' 1 - PDZ. 1 - Level 1 Plan PD2.1 SCALE' 1/16- = 1-0- 12 12 PD2.1 6 0 GARAGE $ C ~PDâ€¢2/ Â£1~ 1 V p \ R Url - 2& 11 1 31Â¢rlliked//4 UZZE: râ€¢ ~ rowland+broughton -a U a,chaacture /urban design/~nterior design ...1/ 'Po,1/ 234 e hopkin5 ave. 1830 blake st ste 200 aspen. co 81611 denver, co 80202 970 544 9006 0 303 308 1373 0 970 544 3473 f 303 308 1375 f fl 1 Â« ~ 0 @[1 [1[I J D--~----~9 1 bl ; 6 -4- 11 1 .1. iÂ»%2- 1 ConsultantsÂ· . 1. OW!Â£0 . 3: r LODGE [fflill*-1 LODGE U R : O DRIVE V / . Id : -1 4-M UNIT L~.,~ ~~.= UNIT 4 21 , 120/21-m= 5 2 1.1 L. 3% su,~/1 Â«\\ 1 1 . 1-1\C '1 Mr-Dliu U. - 1- LINEN 1[-nyx \42/ 9 44: 2St " - 3.Eur- 0 1.5 1[h=* 6!18,1.1-3110: f 9-1 y ~U '-ML 10'Qhmp] p.18~ T . 11- 3/30*ES C |~| AH LODGE CHATEAU, CHATEAU - A -t_-21.9- DUMONT | CHAUMONT Plot Date. 7/13/20154:21.08 PM $4 . 07.14.2015 DETAILED 1 in--7-~t. ~~E ~~RRIDO~ M f 0 - STORY) 1 (3 - STORY) 1 LODGE Issue. 1 -- -7- -~ ill-' Â£ ME!!f L_@% REVIEW -W>- * 963 =UNCC 00,1 11/ r-11 1-Il v~| ~~R'[rl--_ . 1 =1==11&--7.1224 APPLICATION UL= =3 PD52 Â¢,UP 9 023 M lidÂ«J -1 J V - - ~TWI "0 -- Â£7 , p J N-w - 1/M - 111 1 1[ 11; 1 1 1 1 1 1 CE EXISTNG DUMONT PARKING 1, I i i , ~ I 1 0 2 11 1 L L - 1 Z ---- - 1 SALES Lla ) Â· I DlR, B 2 - -- 1 .1 ALLEY V.y 1 2 #Ah - - -- 212 491=5 ~ PROPERTYLLNE DN R - WIJ~,EEJET--IL_~~%%91!~22#9-7-'-~3"-iryÂ·- Â·Â·.-Â· -- - -- -3.2 . ..~-- -----p,Kivii?Azzl----1~<-LiI~~1 11airlll .. _ _ ~~ ELEVII ~ AV/fr li [ 4=qÂ· -- ~Â· --Â· â€ž-- Â·--Â· Â·- 6'Â·,.hÂ·ADi.k ~- - - " = --' 0111 - -1-,PDN --- 1- .... 7- ............. - -!Â· Cy-SIDEWALK. .f-/1_ ---# _j_~, 1 , I oN ON RAMP i ula<f-LUZmn Â·Â· Â·Â· -2-3 -- 22-LLI "- 1 -" - - N ..Â· T 7 .,9,~ -~ B ~~Y -=~< r./Z: 7-~.IRL & LOSBY ~ELEVZ~ ~ U LAJ 1 560" r 3-1 '1*F-FE-twl 1 1 48'Â¥'139* Caul,<1 f=-/0~~ i *7 7 9ADU< F. CONDOMINIUMS ENT 25911 1 WOLL_~L__d -r u~L_L~=-r, BORM I 2-41 4 GLORY HOLE (3 - STORY) V I -- 0 'w===4 %=i| B.O.H. Ey-]130 L-JL_....7 .....L- -1- --1=11 U.2//1/3 I BORM 1 / CHEF/FS EF mil r - 1 1~~-: A,CÂ£ ---J 1 - .-- ' 7 7 1*1 K ilf 7 51 q 7 MUSC~~ tULf OFFICES ~ ' 1 .-*f- 6*03. To THE LITTLE L~i~LisTA,Rz ~27 LOUNGEABOVE NELL HOTEL CORRIDOR (4. STOR'o : f- 1 'f= ~- 1 RECEPTION D ,-. C-D .D CP D C t- LINE OF M FOUNDATIONI "-I W 42 2 9 2 9 29_-4 SKY HOTEL 2-- WALL BELOW-- W.. & _ SKI E . LODGE LODGE LODGE LODGE LODGE LODGE LODGE LODGE . t3(-: -Efub ~~ . I a r~-Â¥ -um n udtio 0 Unia 1330 1---1 Itini L \- ,/3 ' U n 1 / PRIVATE 709 E. DURANT AVE. UL-1 ep 0 .O ito 4447 18 ED L._i [CE f V L ,1 8 1/ RESIDENCE ASPEN, CO 81611 SPECIAL (2 - STORY) EVENT t===:5 SPACE - ~ '.; ~-j~ 1 ~ li :, ~--r. . . Â· LANDSÂ»Q.88Â£* ' .1, \ i L ~ JW~PARKIRG ~ j ALPS PARKINg Nk . / ~ ALPS PARKING ~--3 1%0 :./.M 1- 1 }- J 4 ALPS ACCESS/DRIVEWAY .. C 1 ----1 / / .1 .7, PROJECT NOÂ· 2140660 / ASPEN ALPS ~ 0-sm n SHEETTITLEÂ· BUILDING LEGEND - m HOTEL'LODGE LEVEL 1 FLOOR PLAN ~ J - OPTION B 1 0 1 m -ACkAR~ 1 U--1 --1 1--/, PD2.1 b SCALE: 1/16" = 1'-0" El.AR.. 14+ h 0 1 - h V / 3 b 1 /1 / 7- -'866&~Alij - }R 32 if +Â© 1 '1 SIDEWALK~. L 1 '' ~ \ P p.0.6. ui~ ~ .JP AREA t'-'Er\' 1 PROP..INE Â»Miâ€žal.FW rowland+broughton 1 1 archaecture /urban design /inte,ior d=ign "sy 234 e hopkins ave. 1830 blake st ste 200 aspen. co 81611 denver co 80202 970 544 9006 0 303308,1373 0 970544.3473f 303 308 1375 f PROPE,m,~LIME DECK Consultants: DRIVE THRU LINE. â‚¬ *-2 1,4/#111116 J I A [srm#mMP 1 CHATEAU CHATEAU DUMONT CHAUMONT Plot Date 7/13/20154:21.15 PM 0 Â· STORY) (3 - STORY) Issue 07,14.2015 DETAILED REVIEW APPLICATION 113 *1% "WEIGI Itil=re 1 r.05 2, - r--m ir.-04 *-A~L t - U.-al 4 I o o _,6. P 7 p -1 & I 151[3'Elull 10|r~~ 1 I r|TEER'unll INB#Ilir'I 1 +69 Â£ 1= = - - 9 1 ~ ALLEY V 85 I _.~ZZZAÂ£221 f"f' r-1 i 8 1 =, 4 712.2 1 PROPERTY'NE co - rÂ·-1 4*'ELEVUL_Lf Â®11Â»11___ -- -- -- ~~ DECK . ~ onÂ·~no ' 47~ DECK i J 1 -=-a a ' L 1][1 E[] Fl ['El *10 r[JOR~ I] tod/ h'BE~~Ls< 1 1 /402 1 ELEV 2 KITCHEN ~ *7 1-9 L J L=I 2* LU LL=- __~UfÂ»ki-_1Acs GLORY HOLE E i LOIWE CONDOMINIUMS -1-4. 1 \/ 12 21 (3 - STORY) T F?m f T 2131LNE FT ~~1~3 ~AZI THE LITTLE ==mr --- ,=me==W -69 Mt 901=k16/ 1=62# u==&' ~ NELL HOTEL CORRIDOR (4 - STIR'O SKY HOTEL UNEN 3Â¤12@1 EN'Et r ~11-0-22'21211=21;uu-&23~17~Lihi I L 16 PRIVATE 709 E DURANT AVE. 01010,01 0 RESIDENCE ASPEN, CO 81611 -- -- -- -- Â·739 9â‚¬523*1 LOUNGE/PATIO AREA ..STIR'l Â» 111 621.FEEEJ A RIBED ~ ~ I -SCREENWALLON STONEVALLIGRE. WALL / \ -1*%Â§., I>g~,f, / PROPERTYLINE 1 ' ALPS ACCESS/DRIVEWAY &/00,/Al~ET 4. 182*J /8 44\ 19$, .47 \ le PROJECT NO: 2140660 \/ \1% ~ / ASPEN ALPS BUILDING LEGEND 9-STORY) SHEETTITLE LEVEL 2 FLOOR PLAN O '*'~EL'Loo,~~ 0 -'PACE,COM-AREA 1 Ii-EA 7 -d ~~--2 1 1 SCALE: 1/16" =1-0' < DABLE HOUSING 1 L__-0- PD2.2 1 L U ~KAGE TE~-7 1 V 13 - - - -6-1._.2'17- - 4 U OOF BELp.,OVE 00 PHOPEIIT"UNE EN[1Al~adC}~,i rowland+broughton #T architecture/uman design /#,terior desfgn 234e hopkinsave. 1830 blake st ste 200 aspen. co 81611 denver, co 80202 970544 90060 303308.13730 970 544 3473 f 303308.13751 PMOFERTYUPâ‚¬ 11 DECK LODGE ROCF REVIE Il UNIT 7.../ CORRIDOR 1121 h:ria flll ' 11 11'Al fEd"/4 CHATEAU CHATEAU -7 ===EOHal DUMONT CHAUMONT Plot Date: 7/13/2015 4Â·21Â·19 PM I LID)69 - D-M -1149Â¤Ee 4111 (3 STORn (3 -STORY) Issue. crnUNIT L- .O */ 58 07.14.2015 DETAILED lei ' F.111 APPLICATION ADECK ~ ~0 6=-41â€¢16-4 Ill.1 9 6-11 0 /W, E ;i L____k/1] - LobGO.'71- A./M/1- ' ..CE'Ir P P 3 3 rn. o i i 117~71 m .BE 6 -O 040*via,MI r,A r=11. .O ~ m : i ~191*Wl: O/6.1 ALLEY - 82:11 r<1 n i 2 -3 U.Â«1 .OPERTY'NE 8 0 - fEL.*1 1 1 DECK | t DEBE ~ ~ .2 - ROOF BELOW ELE' |L- .lk,-1 e'" U.h==Ull LOBBY < UNIT ~ if talul GLORY HOLE - St i. FL3Etill,UidEFIC d,~~-3-13@31!4~Lt LIE j CONDOMINIUMS rrbid .Ll-LIJB - r- - 10 --r' 1 -STORn e NED,< P~;~~ 1 MLEVATop~ . Â£ 12 M L | STOR< EIGH 13110 681141. , r *1#19:t~u 1 1[*721-EJ'EfiT=NO [1'Boof-- I THE LITTLE CORRIDOR LODGEJFR~T.'- ~ DEC NELLHOTEL (4 - STORY) # 10 It L SKY HOTEL fy ~ ~~= ~ ~ 1.F#,4-Azk,>Fq 4,4.4,6Fq dr.~- ~g~e~r..~,~ ~~~~~~~k~1 8 4-1,11.rif,JIFT///VILF%3/pri=Fl,7 '=FÂ£=9 .=Â·:~~~1-i, I - i,-..#Illrr-1 UNIT .24 / 217-===9 m m.~-Â·~~~~...a 00 CP/ 011 Do 00 cio ~ *11 @11 --- 1-(3 .9 9,-Ilk.f:%-"-,0=gL 1 - - RESIDENCE ASPEN, CO 81611 PRIVATE 709 E. DURANT AVE. 1 --' 4/Â£1 -,=,#r-- --. '~77-Uu'-7T-7 Â»---=:=Â°=/..CEL...=11-~11 L ~ DECK DECK 4-/ U.> DECK'--' U 1 22=11 L--11. DECK (2 - STORN? r =-7ras ~ | ROOF BELOW- , ALPS ACCESS/DRIVEWAY 4% /2 i // PROJECT NOÂ· \ / 21406.60 / ASPEN ALPS BUILDING (2 - STORY] SHEETTITLE LEGEND HOTELfLODGE LEVEL 3 FLOOR PLAN 0 puauc SPACE,CC]-,ION AREA 0 22/ING 7-_ -1 [_~ J SCALE: 1/16" = 1'-0" IJI---11_7 PD2.3 GARAGE V. V - [A R -ROOF BILOW--Â· PMOPER.WME 3NflklledOWd 00000 r. rowland+broughton .U archRecture / urban des~gn/interio( design / 5/1/ VD51/ 234 a hopkins ave, 183[blake st. ste, 200 aspen,co 81611 denver,co/0202 970.5449006 0 303 3081373 0 970.5443473 f 303 308 1375 f PROPEXTYL!. DECK Consultants: 10 -1 BE{OW 0 Â®IF+ - - 1 1-51 -W. BEL | EZZI} = 1 LODGE/FRACTN--~ - I i 1 D 0 1-/1 1 1 1 00 | CHATEAU CHATEAU ~ 0 DUMONT CHAUMONT Plot Date: 7/13/2015 4 21:27 PM 1 EF1,91 Issue 1 1=31 IMP 1 LODGE/FRACB [ :124 i (3 -STORY] (3-ST n | | 07.14.2015 DETAILED , 1 REVIEW APPLICATION 1 I to . 0 01 I \ U _G bw arlot | 1 LODGEIFRACT. 6 0_ptl 0. 6Â» E 1 21 'th m Â§11 . 11 11 = ALLEY T FAAL 1003 L__ PROPERT78. 8 ' -----------------------------------------7------------------3 - CIO RESTR ELEV 1 1 DECK i iIi,:.'!,ililli. Â·/12Â· -3-/12Â·Z~~ZZZ-Â·,41' I - ELEV. . CZZIOn 11 l i l l i 0 n i l i l i 1 1 DN 5~/12~ 1 LOBBY -7/12 GLORY HOLE ~ 1 11 CONDOMINIUMS | 6 67 A53 ELEV 2 rE-- i i 0-STORY) -r-------r::1 L LODGE/FRACT ~ PO LEQUI P DMIN'| 1 1 I'V 1 1-mt L = 1 0 RESTROOM ---1. 1 8 3 ria '-4 5/89 16'C 1 - PRIVATE LOUNGE I~ iII _, MISE[} W D 5~/12~ lili: 11 1% THE LITTLE m CORRIDOR PU i 0 -- ' 111 C 11 NELL HOTEL : 00 14- (4 - STORn 1 1 00 - SKY HOTEL 1 1 6 12] 00 E-----r=-3-----] 1 - - LODGE/FRACT. LODGE'FRACe w ,Col 1- r .O 1 1 1 1, 01 [L] 035 1, [Ji 1 1 Col 1[=]1 . 1 RESIDENCE ~ 1 ASPEN. CO 81611 | PRIVATE i | 709 E DURANT AVE, DECK DECK DECK _.- | (2 -STORM | DECK 1 1 1 PROPERTYUNE / ALPS ACCESS/DRIVEWAY J Nx /2 1/0 i/.0 PROJECT NO: 2140660 \/ Nt v BUILDING --- ASPEN ALPS (2-STCR~O SHEET TITLEÂ· LEGEND LEVEL 4 FLOOR PLAN 0 z 1 0 SCALE. 1/16" = 1'-0" 5 0 &~0-8~HOUS~G PD2.4 1 O GAUGE r.,7 c=mas'fu T- U ELEVATION ELEVATION OF ELEVATIONOF ELEVATION OF MOST ROOF HEIHT OVER ACTUAL ROOF HEIGHT LABEL EXISTING GRADE PROPOSED GRADE INTERPOLATED GRADE RESTRICTIVE TOPOGRAPHY OVER MOST RESTRICTIVE 1 7342Â·-1 7942'-31/2- PROPOSED 798.-111/2- 38'-101/ 2 - 7941' -9 7942'-1 PROPOSED 7981Â·-7 39-10 rE 3 7941'-71/4- 7942' - 1 PROPOSED 7981Â·- Dll- 39'.5 4 - 7941'Â·61/ 7942'-1 1/4/ PROPOSED 7981'. Dll 39'. 6" 5 7938' - 101/2' 7939-91/2- PROPOSED 7978Â·- r 39'-8/ 5 - 7938-9 79. -71/ INTERPOLIED 7978'- r 39Â·- 111/2 1 - 793/-9 7937. 9 3/4 PROPOSED 797.-0 39' - 5 8 7937' -0 793TÂ·101/2Â» - EXISTING 7971'-41/4~ 34'.41/4~ rowland+broughton g - - 793.-9 3/4 INTERPOLA'ED 7978Â· -7 38'- 91/4" / ' ' i.-1 arch,tecture /urban design/ interi~ destgn f W W 10 7938Â·-3- 7940Â·.0 PROPOSED 7/78'Â· 2 39'- 17 11 - 7942' Â· 0 7942Â· - 2 1/4 PROPOSED 7981*-1 39- 11" 234 ehopkinsave. 1830 b~ake st ste. 200 aspen. co 81611 denver co 80202 12 7944-1 7942Â·Â·111/4 PROPOSED 7973'-5 30 - 5 N 970 544 9006 0 30330813730 13 7944-31/ 7941'-101/2 PROPOSED 797.-2 1/ 34'Â· 4 3/4 070 544 3473 f 303 308 1375 f 14 7943Â· - 111/4 7941Â·-51/4 PROPOSED 7974'-S /4 33' - 0 . 7943 - 11 1/4" 7940'-10- - PROPOSED 7973' - 5 32-T 16 - 7944'.1 1/2 INTERPOLÂ©ED 7971'-10 27.8 1/2" 17 7944' Â· 3 3/4 7940'-10- - PROPOSED 7976'.71/2- 39 - 9 1/r PROPE.rl'Â¥LINE 18 7944' - 9 1/4~ 7940'-10 PROPOSED 7974'Â· 53/4 33-7 3/4 19 7947 - 4 3" 7946'-111/2- PROPOSED 7976'-7 1/4- 29'-7 3/4 20 7947Â· . 0 3/4 7946'-111/2- PROPOSED 7973-5 .- 51/2~ - 1 21 7946 -113/4 79463'-101/4 PROPOSED 7974- 41/4 27.8 - 5-/12- 22 794.-4 1/2 794'-0 PROPOSED 7976Â· - 21/4 29'- 21/4~ Co~sultanlsÂ· 1 1 23 794T. 0 794.-0 EXISTING 7973-5 26'-S | ~ 7981Â·-111/2 I _____5N 12 24 1 - 7943 - 81/2 INTERPOLATED 7981'~ r 3T.101/2~ 25 7946 . 8 1/4 7946 -101/4- EX]STING 35'Â·IllÂ» -/12 /2 36'-11- 25 7947' Â· 0 794.-10- - PROPOSED 7983'-9 1 27 7943' - 5 1/ INTERPOLATED 7981'- 10 38'-41/2Â» 1 28 - - 7943 - 4 3/4 INTERPOLATED 7982 01/2 38Â·-73/4" 29 - - 7943' Â· 1 Or INTERPOLATED 7983' - 9 39'-11" 30 - - 7943' -I INTERPOLATED 7981'- I 38'-11" 1 -EN'.0.'611111. IZEZZIZEZEZZZz ~ 31 7942Â· 10 1/ INTERPOLAIED 7982.3 1/2~ 39'-5 1 r- 1 -1 1. 88 7 d t=3 - CHATEAU CHATEAU | | DUMONT - 1 0 0 - 0 -STORY) (3 - STORY) === Mb ' CHAUMOI\IT PÂ»t Sale: 7/13/2015 4.21:34 PM Issue 07 14.2015 DETAILED 1 REVIEW APPLICATION 2Â·/12Â· 2 m 2~/12' ~21 1 1 1 -- m 2=* 1 1 POOL LOUNGE - - --- - - DECK AREA _ |~ Po, 2 N., c=&60 12 1 1 - 1 7 6 ' =gRE---- El i c 5 E & 1- FOOL: 1 ALLEY V 2 4 PRO~ENTÂ·r UNE 1 1- I Et.EV - /- 1 1 ? 1111-1 1 ADI LIDGE' DN 2- |41 ill 1 1..,1 , 11~11'111'1~11 11 lili - 1 1 1 1 L.J L..1 El// EQUIP 11111!1 |um||'|~'~'~'~'''~'~'~116.11 211 Ell' zi' 4%1119-qr -- u*MM,#I = 1 1 GLORY HOLE | FTTT171 ECIEIC] ' ' R -2... CONDOMINIUMS 1 1 lili 11111111 1ROOF 11 D 1 1 1 ROOF 1 1 1 i 1 (3 -STORN) " )3 7-1 lili 1 : 1 BENCH , 311 1 1 SEE LEVEL 4 FLOOR Il ROOFI |0|- CABANAS 1 9 EL113 6*N I- 1,12 [E] (MOVABLE-8'11) ~ -- --. dil IN" 4 1 9 fit (MOVABLE 8'10 THE LITTLE 1117 111: NELL HOTEL _ys -t 010 l--m (4 - STORY) -' Flhz aAR W/ LOUNGE DECK AREA OIC mc 2 141 441---,M=~| ~ ~-------------~ SKY HOTEL FP -36-1 -rE-1 ,-74 BENCH iU -01â‚¬- / 00 - - , CO 0- 1 1 BARDEMAREA. RAISEDWD PLATFORM --- --- - 1 *04 8 . 973 - - - -- 1 1 -0 =222/12â€¢ I I | PRIVATE | 709 E. DURANTAVE. 1 1.11 i4111111111%-N 1111 1 '3- / 1 - - , i; 1 billi lilli 11 1/1114*41 -7 1 1 RESIDENCE I ASPEN. CO 81611 1 3-'12 Li#~H|/|i h -3.2 1 .z-Â« Illhi 1 (2.STORY) 4-/12-_. ~ - 1 1 1 1 1 PROPIERTY UNE , ALPS ACCESS/DRIVEWAY 4:\ 410\ // PROJECT NO: 21406.60 / . ASPEN ALPS Nt v BUILDING - LEGEND [2 - STORM SHEET TITLEÂ· O HOTEL'LODGE ROOF PLAN El I~ PUBL. SPACe.CIMMON AREA z PLAN TRUE NORTH NORTH SCALE: 1/16" = 1'-0" O COMMER'~LAREA -82 PD2.5 ~ 1 AFFO~c.eLEHOUSING 1 PD2 5- 00 - LE /8 -1:/ L_1 PEFâ‚¬"~ 1 H PAIr,/1,15,~o,iu.TIDNÂ¥~EEÂ£/â„¢2-4)eN 5*1*31.9231311:- i. LOOK~REA- I MATERIALS LEGEND i 1 1 'WI......l . Al ..iM 1=11 ~OODS,0.0 -0-Iii 11:1 'w,OEVERâ„¢X .. - rowland+broughton arch*ect-/ urban design / ir*erior design 2340 hopkinsave 1 630 blak, st # 200 1954 .*veÂ¢E. aspm- 81611 denver. co 80202 970 544 9006 0 303308 1373 0 970 S44 3473 f 303.308.13751 U]111 -TALâ€¢00' Z 1 1? 1 *000 S~TS 1/2 POINT FROM CHIMNEY ELEVATOR OVERRUN CABANAS BEYOND (TEMP/MOVABLE 8Â·) g EAVE TO RIDGEn r . l r I L 42 POINT FROM EAVE TO RIDGE 1/2 POINT FROM T O CONC. EAVE TO RIDGE-T-X ConsultantsÂ· -/INTEROM 47lir===========*========4'' --- ROOFOEgill A _2=b._. -_-- r-T.O.CONC. DECK -/7 EAVE To RIDGE-1 .4*342~ 7981.7- ARF--- - ---- -~jIZErmu~DR:1571-2~77-.a"A#- T O CONC \12Â· 3~x.. .21. 1 EAVETORIDGE-1 ROOF DECK B 1 J / 12Â·--- _7 Nwer 1 15- 1 /.31:r - -1 Bf.H- 12' ..... ._ f.1- 4 7971'-10- - - -7 . -~ Â»Â· +EZEEZZEUT T 0 CONC ~~~ ' ~ ' _ _ LEMEL 4B 1 7968Â·.la T ~ 1 - 10 - 7-0- RE--0- Â»=9--6 01 1 r 8 0-1 TO CONC. , b - - ~ U =fÂ® LEVEL ]A_ 1 T.O.CONC 7962'-1- -= , % 1 L. - ---- : LE.1-38 4 4 . , I [Im, RI]~M [fl[Q 1 ~ 11H ---~ 1Â¢1[%1~ - r - .59'-I 3 E 1 -rifi 1 03 ttv 1 9 Toe"C ~ _ 3 rr~IttF # 1.71 3 Plot Date. 7/1 3/2015 4 21Â·39 PM f 1 -M ! - T O CONC - - -1 --- -- - - LEVEL28 4 41 1 Issu. | W - 7Â§39'-4- r 07,14.2015 DETAILED rr-1 --4 .1~3 0.-77 EBEEI mm Bm am -h)/ REVIEW / O li'..' APPLICATION T 0 CONC . 8 *Â»ME#< EIES : B E + 1 ~al LEVEL.lA 11 LU P 7940'-10Â· -~ P P 'P DRIVE -THRU ~ ~'~' TO CONC RECESSED P.,1OM*uoâ€¢,AÂ¥ 86~OW AUEr ELÂ®VAT,gN ~ , i , _ L EMEL 1 8 1 J J 7937-iy - BEYOND ALLEY ELEVATION FOREGROUND ELEVATION TO. CONC BASEMENIk" - 7926Â·.10 T 0 CONC BASEMEINI,18 1 7923Â·-1. 7 ' ALLEY (NORTH ELEVATION) DURANT AVE. (NORTH ELEVATION) f 1 1 NORTH EXTERIOR ELEVATION SCALE 3/3/ n 0- PO. .' T T >i t LOORMERIS / EXCLUDED FROM j I HEIGHT Q rl/2 POINT FROM 40 CONC DECK ./2 POINT FROM .DORMERIS . i. CALCULATIONS-~ . PRO RIOGE1 / EAVE TO RIDGE / EXCLUDED FROM w HEIGHT Z :0 FTO CONC DECK ~ SKY HOTEL TILLIS / CALCULATIONS I /12 POINT FROM / - -O.I.U.U.lj_1_1-14Â·- ~GLASS GUARDRAIL ~ i J EAVE TO RIDGE 1 IiI Il 1 1 , r--r--1 I TO. CONC T.0 CONC fl~ 5 1- --------.-.-.--- -EggliECKA 1 J .1 7981.-7. 7 pr -t---1-*-M?ytgKL - -- -1- - --_ 1[1 - 1 1- - - 5. cp-T ' , 709 E. DURANT AVE. 1,i -- RIER.~ FRFR-k=-cd ASPEN, CO 81611 %0% 0.- 1 cn TO CONC 1 1#vEL,A 1 J TO lONi ~ 7971'Â·10 T r r... 1. - 4 1 LEVEL/8 El[[1 j z j RE - FFIFI FIFI - -90*1[{1- - ~ -- -___ ____ _-___-- 7*.1 T O CONC LEVEL 3A m T O CONC . m LEVEL 38 795&F-1Â· '-' ' 7-|i 'I Ill I 1 - .- LEVEL 2 PATIOAREA I It â‚¬1, 1 I BEE] - - 994Â«2- Eld *,- J - ---- --- 11 1 1 T O CONC LU LEVELZA _i-/-_~_-- Er- 7952Â·Â·4Â· LEVEL,L _ _ ~ 7949 -4 1/ I / I 1 . L~ 1 ..1 3 1 ./ 1 - ~0 CONG PROJECT NO: ----- ------------- Lgv Ll A 2140660 TO CONC ERB 4 794Cy-10" LEVEL 'L__ __ _ _________ GARAGE ENTRY 7ErÂ·tg- ---ill---- M/N ENTRY SHEET TITLE: TO CONC PROPOSED EXTERIOR BASEMENT LlA 1 J T O CONC 7926// ELEVATIONS BASEMENT 1:121 ----------- --- - ---- - --- - ---------- ------------ --4.--ip----.1---1----- -------------- 7923'-10Â· SCALE: As indicatedl PD4.1 ~ ~ WEST EXTERIOR ELEVATION ==râ€¢Â·=*.=t= P041mal--,-/ WT 1/ EASTPROPENTYLNE g,nAill@.KC.Â¥dl~NA 14' 0 11' 6 9 9' 9 9Â· 9Â·.9- -6.6 .5. .9 L On Â· . .N .... NOAâ„¢ P./.E'/* 40'-9 14'Â·0' 11'6 M8LLfL!&2.Lf#132 1 rvi,!OE ),OR,ZONFAL i' .0. MORIZONTA rE vi~OOSLCÂ»,G 1.-23 -S~Â»16 rowland+broughton arc/tactie / IM des,//interior deign 234, hopkinsav~, 1830 blake st ste 200 aspen, co 01611 der,ver, co 80202 970.54490060 303 308.13730 970 544 3473 f 303 308 1375 f 1% rl/2 POINT FROM 1/ I EAVE TO RIDGE-A _â€ž-1/2 POINT FROM : 1/2 POINT FROM CHIMNEY ~ EAVE TO RIDGE-k CASANAS (rEMP'/MOVABLE 8Â·~~ EAVE To RIDGE 1 1 / ,-TO CONC DECK Fl/2 POINT FROM 1/2 POINT FROM GLA S GUA DRAIL Â£[b-â€žÂ·-i ~ EAVE TO RIDGE-N~ EAvE TO RID.El T.O CONC 1 =-~4;4=rt;==-R~r_5~LIZINELIZILLEEZILLIZE' Consultarm: TO, CONC &~~Ege__ __ Â«-_12112--- -- - -- 6---- -Â·- - --2 ----- -- - ---- - ----- -7--~~i~-7 - -4-1- - _ _ Re-FOECKA 1 4 4 - - GLASS GUARDRAi L 12-----ENt.---~ 7981Â·-7- T F r..W. 3. 1\ 1 1 2-'755= 2 .... 2--1- -1 2<3Â«1112- T O CONC -5- LEVEL 4,L - - - -'- _~\7 -* - -=.7.~/.pir LEVEL 4' 1 J 797 T'.10- Â· - ' -- , - rTTrfi~-3.71- 1 4 .14 16 T 0 CONC LEVEL 3A_ _ a - 1 | LEVELI - 2_ 1- T O CONC -1 3 '- - 7962Â·-1 7962'-1~ . I . ---- --- - .-- -â€ž.9- .1 ./ . I * 1 --- Â§ E . - ---Â· - -- 1--ill k | , GLA S ~ 'G S |-1 IS T.O CONC -- TO CONC Plet DataÂ· 7/13/2015 4:21:44 PM 1 - LEVEL 2A - . t -U -- - - issue: 7952'/ mm - . 07 142015 DETAILED REVIEW P APPLICATION 7 0 CONC LEVEL 1A 794/Â·1 C- T O CONC TO CONC 8ASiMENT WA BASEMENT LlA Ii-- ilin-&* il- -*I---- -I--~- *- ill.LI -- -9--I --W1-~-; 7926'-10. ASPEN ALPS ACCESS/DR)VEWAY (SOUTH ELEVATION) < 1 j SOUTH EXTERIOR ELEVATION lp04,2/ SCALE 3/32- Â¤ 1'-{r M % 1 1 X TRELLIS BEYOND ELEVATOR OVERRUN 4 GLASS GUARD)RAIL Â·--V-Llar_U'.64 SKY HOTEL _CITI L-__10 1 -_~ ..1-~ ' T O. CONC ROOILIECKA 7981Â·.r M TO. CONC ROOF DECK . 1 J ' 7978Â·-7- 7 . 709 E. DURANT AVE. 1/ 1/ 1 1 11' ASPEN, CO 81611 r.0 CONC | LEVELÂ» _ _ 4 .5~~~r-TUTT~'__. ~ F~-fÂ·.- frfri[~Ili[3_~ ;- ~ ' '1 -TE[90-1 1 6 6-4 1 . rl! TO CONC 7971'-10- I LEVEL.8 -- i TO CONC Â«=--===Â»-Â«- ------E 1_1-EW-12/ M E 7968'-10- . D, LEVELIA --- -- 1 --- 7962'.1 - 4 1* . ak T O CONC _LEVEL 38 -] m + 7959'-1 TO CONC i - LEVEL 2A - ------ ---i- -P--- - -: % ~ --LE_u | i -3 -'ty j.:<:2 mm i ~ 7952'-4" f TO CON' --- _ _ _ _ _ _ _LEVEL 28 7949'-4- TOCONC ~31 6#;FRA Â·.MA-; -am---* 4 - : mm i - PROJECTNO: Ull-1 1 T O CONC LEVEL 1A 21400.80 LEVEL 18 FOREGROUND ELEVATION ----------------- r- - 7937-10 BEYOND ALLEY ELEVATION 6 SHEET TITLE ORIGINAL STREET (EAST ELEVATION) 3 T 0 CONC PROPOSED EXTERIOR BASEMJENT Ll A I - Il--u.~-1---Il--I --I.i---.--I ---- TO lONi ELEVATIONS 7926Â·-10Â· BASEMUNT Ll 8 & SCALE: As indicated PD4.2 li < 2 ~ EAST EXTERIOR ELEVATION 1. 904.ZLIGALEI.,<1-3~ .2 - Ir. 21.- -' - -16 /7-EFET WEMPMOP.TÂ¥UNE 14Â·Â·0Â· 11/ 9.9. 97 40Â·9' â€¢6Â·,0/ â€¢0.. SC]Uâ„¢PMOP.TY,NE 14'/ 11'/ 9Â·.9- 9+93- â€¢6Â·.0/ MATERIALS LEGEND M 8 WIDEHORIONTAL ~ WOOSIDING 1.-WIDEHOR'./AL WOOD SIOING râ€¢ ~ WODOING 'WIDEVERTICAL rowland+broughton architecture/urban des,/inten. design I rrONEVENEER 234Â®.hopkinsave 1830 'lake :L ste. 200 aspen,co 81611 dernrei. co 80202 9705449006 0 3033[}813730 '11~1111 M.ALAODFO, 970 544 3473 f 30330813751 1~1 WOODSLATS TRELLIS --21_-- 01- rer Consultams: T O CONC -fa-- -3 r.... 1 ' ' 1 T O. CONC J ' E ~44 Lf"&12 _ _11_ _j__1~~-4~-ff$-'_21-1777~_ 1_ _ __~__ _____ _ -7-,Iii ROOF DECKA 1 1 .00,016.8 - .~- -1r- - ---- < 1- fr,Til Irrr!'1 --11 T-75?rp ~ T O CONC o i - 7971.1/ T O CONC. 3- 1 LEVELâ€¢8 -- - --- - 1 -1"72To- I [[1[[I ~ __El@__ M %_=-*Â«I-lti ;m49*Hili~ Â«p~l =11=' _ __ ______------ T O CONC LEVEL IA ~ 7962'-1" T O CONC Plot Date 7/13/2015 4.21 46 PM 1 LEVEL 38 LEVEL 2 PATIOAREA T--7Â§.. Â¤ 1 12[]L[JIL-1--K| ic~Uist'I ~ ~ i 1 I~ L~1 9 ~_1-_Il Llj.. ' T 0 CONC. 07.14.2015 DETAILED Issue: *EVELIA 1 REVIEW TO CONC '58 0 2 ~33108" id {E=_22:5~~~~Tlk ff-vÂ¢Â· 1-,===r===-1- - 1 LEVEL 28_ 7952Â·-4- T APPLICATION T--7., - mr -nly [: 015 ~ F - 2-1-- -- Ela-~~-Elm- Â·- - 60- --EFfRIPmrn -i a~11_L_ ----- --1----------- =9 - 1 u 'UNL. TO.CONC 1 LEVEMB . . -f-. - - - . - - - - -------MAINENTRY -+-7937Â·-10'- GARAGE ENTRY 8" HORIZONTAL WOOD SIDING 14" HORIZONTAL WOOD SIDING 6" VERTICAL WOOD SIDING STUCCO STONE VENEER METAL ROOFING WOOD SLATS 1....1.-, 1 - 0 -Ii-*- -93:.-I- ./.1 Mi:1&49*%**I 'lir-/~Flfg. --1 W ~ 447*// - Ap m M. SKY HOTEL i***i#* ~U:Â·i'-Â©w/// 709 E. DURANT AVE ASPEN, CO 81611 =:11~ #+' 320 : lff'-71 ~ PROJECT NO: 2140660 SHEET TITLE: PROPOSED SKY HOTEL MATERIALS SCALE: As indicated PD4.3 Â°of'-M-=i*K -_ 2*.*--(*Ti co#.WZÂ¢.fIT~,ETO ,i rowland+broughton archit-ure / urban d-0/ inta,ior./. 234 a hopkins ave 1830blkeststa 200 a~p~n,co 81611 ~lenver, co 80202 970 544 9006 0 303308,13730 970 544 3473 f 3033081375f Consultants: TO CONC Rogf DECK A 7981Â·.7" - - _- P.NTER 2/4 PRIVATE ROOF DECK AREA ~ PLANTER T 0 CONC r. 2 Â·.7 :.~b â‚¬. . .- - - - - ---*AM Â¢ U I ' U LODGE'FRACT CORRIDOR LODGE/FRACT 8 -, 9 T O CONC LEVELy. 1, 6 1-1 - --- - -7967-1- 7 -6 CORRIDOR LODGE - 1 . LODGE w N UNIT / UNIT I TO CONC plot Date: 7/13/2015 421 48 PM 51 11Â¤ ____ .LEVEL 2A *,~ _ 7952'=r 15Sue ALLEY CORRIDOR Lo[GE - 07.14.2015 DETAILED LODGE / UNIT ALLEY 4 REVIEW f 1 9-ir UNIT K (BUNK) _ U APPLICATION T 0 CONC _LEVâ‚¬LlA i . 1 1. ': 1 7940Â·-10- f 11 1 STORAGE 9 1 i L GARAGE R: LOCKERS : TO CONC 1 3 -SEMENI.611-.Lâ€¢/ 7926Â·Â·lor T 1---4 -1 EL 1 < 1 ~ Building Section (Alps/Alley) SCALE /32 .1-0 SKY HOTEL lili 111 T.0 CONC I ~ I ~ 709 E.DURANTAVE i ROOF DECK A .~ ., TOCONC EE?Â· _________ -RFF-ECKa 1 , â€¢ LODGE/FRACT 7978'-7" 'F ' ~ ASPEN, CO 81611 4 :: TO CONC 61 LODGE/FRACT 6 LODGE/FRACT -1 1 LEVEL 4A 2 1 7 TO CONC 7971Â·-10 X , 7968Â·Â·10 1 6 LODGE/FRACT. LODGE LODGE .U 2. 11 7 UNIT UNIT N . LODGE LODGE LODGE LODGE LODGE LOOGE LODGE â€¢ TO CON' a UNIT UNIT UNIT UN{T UNIT UNIT LiNEN UNIT ' ,,,--_-_---_ - __KEVEL.38 06 â€¢6 T O CONC r 11 7959-1- r ., 4 + LOUNGE M LODGE LODGE LODGE LODGE LODGE LODGE LODGE N - LINEN Uln' r TO CONC aiD UNIT UNIT UNIT UNIT UNIT UNIT LEVEL 2A Â£311 . . 4 i J--.- -- ------ -- TO CONC _______- _LEVEL 28 06 . ./11 b s~ 6 2 Z SPACE 6 6 LOBBY ENTRY SALES LODGE LODGE LODGE LODGE LODGE 6 6 . PROJECT NO T C CONC : GM DIR UNIT UNIT UNIT UNIT LiNEN UNIT - r - 21406/0 LEVEL 1A I .--TO CONC _LEvEL 1 8 1 . . | | . i--71 - - 793T-10- F ' ' 1 -1-.1171 SHEET TITLEÂ· t el al PARKING WOMEN'S STAFF b '~"1 1 TO CON' I, MEETING b HRAT t 01 GARAGE MECH/ELEC/UTiLITY ROOMS 2 RR LOCKERS 5 ; I li - PROPOSED BUILDING &Â¥r \ 01 ----- :IIi T.O CONC SECTIONS 4 10 - - - - - - - BASEMENT Ll B A % i 7923'-1 Or 7 - 21 1 SCALE: 3/32" = 1'-0" ~ 2 ~ Building Section (Durant Ave/Alps Alley) PD5.1 439 SCALE. 3/32 . 1'4 r<NTM "ms .7- ,LO : ~Â£ _ ~Aa.-30â‚¬P:'Â·1Â· .6-.8 ... ' 0. .6-,6 ' .63 6 INIOHS -6 .6 .6.6 ..6 rowland+broughton arch. cee//*Idel. J%nteno, design .4 I hopkins av, 1830).Il. st ste 200 aspe'.co 81611 d,AÂ¥-,co 8C202 970 544 90'06 0 303308 13730 970 544.3473 1 303 308 1375 ' Consu~nts: T O. CONC. 1 ROOFDEQ<B 1 LODGE/FRACT CORRIDOR : LODGE.'FRACT K ) 3: 291 11 T 0 CONC 1 LEVELIB_ ------L U U 1-- LODGE CORRIDOR l~~TE p ~ ~ UNIT cn TO CONC Plot Date /13/2015 4:21Â·49 PM 1 LEVELDL ----- Issue: T 7959'-1- _L u u 07.14.2015 DETAILED LODGE LODGE LOUNGE UNIT UNIT ~ T 0. CONC ~ ~ ~ REVIEW APPLICATION 1 LEvE,28_______ PRIVATE ACCESS ILV-1 U U -1-HRU-WAY LODGE LODGE b CORRIDOR E--1 UNIT uNIT J n SOUTH SPRING STREET T O CONC - -1 1 LE'EL 18_ 1,2 : 1 : COOLING b MEN'S PRE-FUNCT]ON MEETING 4/1,1@ TOWER 0 RR SPACE ROOMS D / 3 1% li TO CONC :4 1 BASEMENTL,B _ T-yainÂ· 1 Â· | 1 -= STEPPEDSTRUCTURE. ~ NO EXPOSURE < 1 ~ Building Section (Spnng SUDIÂ·nont) ~POS.2j/ SCALE /32 = 1Â·-0- ~44*42 -,21 -*..,:. L , ,'E**11,'f?Â·,Â·MÂ·JI r H --PL . 0. CONC SKY HOTEL ~-------1-------2----74---------------__---=~ ~ I LODGE/FRZ' 6 LODGE/FRACT 5 ELE. 2 DORRID:R 4 6 T O CONC p.Â·riÂ·Â·d - -- - _LEVEL 4A 1 m 709 E. DURANTAVE. - 7971.10. f % ASPEN, CO 81611 LODGE/FRACT. LODGE/FRACT LODGE LODGE LODGE LODGE LODGE ELEV ELEVATOR LODGE ir 10 UNIT UNIT u~,-r UNIT UNIT LOBBY 2 DORRIDO UNIT : STIR 2 9 T O CONC ====1 - 1.EVEL ]A 6 . 7962'-1- 7 . LODGE LODGE LODGE LODGE LODGE LODGE LODGE LODGE LODGE ELEV. m UNIT UNIT STAIR 2 UNIT UNIT UNIT UNIT UNIT UNIT UNIT KITCHEN LOBBY ELEV 2 6 T I lONi -EVEL ZA 4 .1 7952-4- T ~BUNK' (BUNK) UNIT UNIT UNIT i LOBBY LODGE LODGE HOTEL ADU 1 ADU 2 UNIT UNIT LODGE LODGE LODGE TRASH BORM STAIR 2 80RM ~ HIJI-11-1 BOH SOUTH SPRING STREET N TO CONC --------- - 7940-lor f - 1 --, AVA 1/ . I ~ PROJECT NO ELEV 21406 60 ~I OEINF~CE ~ r STAIR 2 LOBBY ELEV 2 i _ BASEMENT Ll A 1 , L. TO CONC f - 7926Â·-10- f ' SHEET TITLE C- 1 1 -0 STEPPED .Rl~31/ PROPOSED BUILDING NO EXPOSURE SECTIONS ' SCALE. 3/32= 1'-0 ~ 2 ~ Building Section (Glory Hole/2 pring St) - B \ PD5.2 1 SCALE 3/32 4'/ PD5.2 & I -1 .EE. 'I n*.-I'llk. " 2 4 _1*._.Ze. =â„¢M- â€¢6Â·,0/ r ,ry. 5. fÂ©.3 .. .. ....... e.%./...3. . s h - =4-- 7.93 . I. a AL Â»L~ . lid A â‚¬..9, â€¢â€¢4&1~ j./9 * . . ...9 ;24: =2--1 /' fill,4 .,6//A .CE; - 6. I I . */. , .441:] ,-:-Â·k -CW#& 14 1 ~14 7;11#laf'-~ _~~ : ;4, - 2621 ft ./-61/ -I # r' 1.. 'it-0,~i.~-,il:.â„¢c. .'.: r â‚¬ . I. a. . . 12 I '. 121 ....i .1- 12 44*1 1 .+Parht A * AA Â£@t & -- i.4 ...4 #M lf#a# /7 .7.'97 /11- -14 2*-1. A I /4 1 - 1 1 ... - 9% 0 - 4 -r A- , -."-lili.~ 42 -*- . '777.Â¥*3 , 1- 94 . 1 3 410.,EV:-I.. ' r li â‚¬39 337~9~~ 0-- ' i .Â· . 1 3â‚¬ t.'I . ' D .. A : 0 .- .. -,2 1 1 99 + 1 4 - 1 f 1 1------1 .Sty 4,â„¢21..2 4 - -12Â¤ i & . â€¢354"~Â°'.3 6*40- { . 'Â·' leâ„¢124, I '4Â», I I - ./ ta 1 IR ... I .1 , .,Â¥4'62 1 â€¢ . .. k ,414 --Mi~ -- 11 , e- .4 66,68,0 ..p- . 4.I-*I - - , cy .*p....... fl *= : i ... 24*11 - - -... .- 6 I - :ee r - 6 1 p â‚¬â‚¬4:- 4 94#11â‚¬9 1 t. .. --.. Vt. -: . ...25 3. 1 Â·1+ * I. 3%4=â‚¬ 1 * 33 ... ./. .- ....... .. Affr / 6 - ./ 11, &*di ' 10 97.1 I ;8:14* k -- A -'01 .Â·, .iÂ·jOUSÂ« 4247/ 4 3 * 1 , 4 --:0 -1~---61 * -3 2 . r. _ 0 ../.41L= Â£4 . P k 1165/=ial."priÂ·-ill _ 64 alukRUE.ki 0 1 WEI'/9/ -2 . *rir 0.-4 39Â«10 . e . I. 4/ - e -57 &.'.7.'-#*~4-~1=9472fbm=s~'~L 9 . -I:.1-22:%"a C.~- - -I ::142:3*44+ 1.-, 54 t :/ 1 12"17. + .2 - . . 1.1 ... .4. -- - J. t . --2 -- -. ... /4/1 1 9 L..0 .4 T. ' - .Â¥tÂ¢: -- . 7. *. 7. - I I /4. I r.*= ~ 194. 4 4 3 - 1 + * ,- - r #:#4 -. 4--143Â¢19/2: 1 7 44' 4 ---1 . /L ./ E ... 0 4.11 ./ .4% $ 2. --I---~ -- sor/:PLE,/ fl-%1Al.14 . 19% . 1.2=Â»,43 4*.6 54 J *i * 1 ./.Ii- 44'I/,1, ju*%,A-,2 E .:- j.. i.'E 1,Â¢4*0*0 '09* ./%lilli.r* 71 1 : 40 - 1. . - jN~--2: i p. S >6 - t.-% 1. ;-'' )7~+L . D. - 111 $.i jr 11â€¢â€¢/ 13C ~ f ~ :~ '1, . * 41 - -3. 1 --~ 6 F. ,==di.'-D#M- 1 . . I. 0 - 4 --- le/+Uf-fi**fit 4.fcâ€ž, r -&/1 ./2-t..21'W,1.r t' 1 -Â§ 1.1 I . 1 7-D. '' ==La- , -t I '.- . - - -=22-2 ' 1 I. -ir Il--.0-Â£..-i - 3 :y -7... .-* 1 .... -Mn 9 '1 I. - ... ... 0. . Â· 1, . V 5 - 1.Â· . k .. - t 1,+ ..2.$* 0. i-J.- â‚¬ V ,. - 4% 0 *Pâ‚¬Fr -4-4 -i-- ==7 :0123242 9 'r 1.al-.= I= I 04 - .7 -1 ....#.. 22tZna Â»0..0 4 7/ 4 . = *d i' 44~ ~ 2â€ž*2.1!I 1 E _2267J22--i_i*~29' i,4 7ft*Â» P-< -,1 A ' 11IÂ·Â·miâ„¢ 4,;Prt i*3%47 5*2 em ir *12â‚¬44/ 1~ 72=Vt d>Â» ' 52 â€¢ = y= 41: -12 * -2- 1* .- i - 94Â£321%4< & .*- 4*4 /62% . i I - 12W--*$--4..abiAZE,ih 1â‚¬,- I- ~'s. I ./ - * x.- - -'â‚¬t 3- , 1 ... 9 -Il.../.... 4 2 7 * 721 F , 1 1. 7 . 43#MiV ' '2~ ' f. : 1.1.23 . CIN. 1- Â·Â· , .1 .. r 1 6.. r, . .. L LL . ..7 40,3 %, :i/. . I . . 1 ~ - ' *â‚¬ , .3, ......9 :8 i . . L= &. 1- I tw , .4.6 i 1 el * . -- irÂ¥ . 1 . 6 i. I 0% t I -' e NE 3 fiÂ»f91 - â€¢ 1â€¢â€¢ : Imi"* 1 't 1 1 . --a -- ./ - I . . - ,- '2*=--7/'IM.& / , *Ay I . ...9 - ~,r'f #99/,le'Y,trlitg,9., 13 * 7.6 .,3 391.-4 d ! 1 -. 1 ..: 27 -2 L - 1, ..-= Â·Â· 2 . I ./ '0. 1-----il:. e.46- Â·Â· i A. t--1.1--1 ' Le- L ... 44.13 74, 1 T 4 'm .4 .1 1 .2-L ~a f 1. , 1 1 1>. 1 02/.1 1, . -S. â€¢ 0, I./1,/9./.- 1 - 1 1 - 1 - .,01,73 1 ; -11 r '6* kiÂ· .. 1 -- , ...(ilillilililiplillilil//IlA ! r .1 9.1 ---7/- 2 49 5 -1, 1 0 5 d -~--ilt-- - ~- i 1 . OJ-i ) I ii: . M ---4# 4*4 1... ... . 2 ... V 4* . 1 7 y 17' d . 12$&14' 2%42:14:j~Â·, b.- I.&'44..Let. 21- "C~'07 .=iÂ·,r. -r .: . . .. A .. Ill 1(I iu~ 0 - FINAL PLAT OF: SKY HOTEL SUBDIVISION/PD A PARCEL OF LAND SITUATED IN THE NWh OF SECTION 18 - - -- 9 l TOWNSHIP 10 SOUTH, RANGE 84 WEST OF THE 6th P.M. CITY OF ASPEN, COUNTY OF PITKIN, STATE OF COLORADO 1 2/. )'TRI- 2-PAnt k ': 1,4 ..i ,~1Â·ci A-_E~"~Â»74.. \,1 CERTIFICATE OF OWNERSHIP AND DEDICATION: SHEET 1 OF 2 VICINITY MAP, CONTROLLING MONUMENTATION, PROPERTY DESCRIPTION, EXISTING EASEMENTS AND ENCUMBRANCES, NOTES AND CERTIFICATES 4>-1 ~-1-1-1 I 1 KNOWALL MEN BY THESE PRESEIVTLTITHEUNDERSIGNED,BEINGTHEREPRESENTATIVEOF 7 "Â·. h. 72-'-2.'Iii.'1 9.'11,%19' ...6.- Cul",1's .2. fi=71.,1, ZKJ--~ 0 1 -- 2-TH+.:-....*.. . THE OWNERS OF THE FOLLOWING DE5CRIBED REAL PROPERTY SITUATED IN THE CITY OF ASPEN, PITKIN COUNTY, COLORADO, TO W[T: -924.1 : ' -,t. -2-'. t -77&446:.It- PROPERTY DESCRIPTION UÂ« i 10 \ (FROM TITLE COMMITMENT REFERENCED IN SURVEY NOTE 5 HEREON) (11. .....C ..1 I'lk j - V.'11 PARCELI GPS 2 WOODSTONE INN CONDOMENIUMS, ACCORDING TO THE CONDOMINIUM MAP THEREOF FILED S. GALENA 5TREET AND E. DURANT AVE. 71. .,4 I -- , MARCH 11.1983 IN PLAT BOOK 14 AT PAGE 45 THROUGH 49 INCLUSIVE, AT RECEPTION NO. / PER 2009 MARCIN CONROL SURVEY i ~0133477 / , I 41 -1 - POUACK RANDAUJ / ./ Â· p. f 1 -- --- --C < 248609 AND AS FURTHER DEFINED AND DESCRIBED IN THE CONDOM INIUM DECLARATION FOR WOODSTONE INN CONDOMINIUMS RECORDED MARCH 11, 1983 IN BOOK 441 AT PAGE 814 AT lour / i 1 DURANT MALL ~ 3 RECEPTION NO. 248608. MAT SK. 4 PG. 565 '.. RE I I , .. ..C lei %. . - . yIll' 1\ , 'i 2 4 ' 111 L l 1 1. ..'/ ./\1 4 1 1 Ill FOUND #5 REBAR AND --1 . /1, I. . 1.25" CAP 4%~FÂ»%243.e PARCEL It LS.#20)151 - 32.1'23.. / l-FOUNDP.K. N|AIAND i +.3(:111'.- W.-- E 138101 A NON-EXCLUSIVE EASEMENT AND RIGHT-OF-WAY FOR THE PURPOSE OF INGRESS AND EGRESS - ' 1/ SHINER / 1 l 1 OVER AND ACROSS THAT CERTAIN PARCEL DESCRIBED IN LONG FORM EASEMENT AGREEMENT UNRECORDED, NOTICE OF WHICH 15 GIVEN BY SHORT FORM EASEMENT AGREEMENT RECORDED i - 13#19598~ ~ , '-m TLE PARCEL 111 TO BE VACATED /THIS P ENCROACHMENT AGREEMENT Â£425 4.907 --- ----- -Ps.0. -1 - APRIL 25, 1977 IN BOOK 327 AT PAGE 777. ' i .,7 2 1 FOUND#5''i~I'~I~ **46/44134ly- -Â·2. #Wip'< 1 F , ---1 1-'.1- PARCEL 111 ENCROACHMENT UCENSE AGREEMENTS FOR THE PURPOSES STATED THEREIN RECORDED EOUND~~ril ~ ~ Â£Â°;-{~ 404 ~jig ~ b ZÂ¢- j ;V HÂ°-~E=1Vt~ON/4 -~ ~ - 7 \ -24/447 // 1 1 , 97-Gâ€ž..1, a 1 -14 -'. . ... 1 -1 1 17= - .. $ 1.25. CA 3 S 74~18 1 .0 1 4.2 - / 4 . SEPTEMBER 3, 1976 IN BOOK 316 AT PAGE 232, APRIL 30, 1982 IN BOOK 425 AT PAGE 907, IN . 11629 BOOK 425 AT PAGE 913, IN BOOK 425 AT PAGE 919, AND RECORDED NOVEMBER 13, 1985 IN BOOK 2.W.. 498 AT PAGE 909. (ALLTO BE VACATED BY THIS PLAT) - fie-- . 1.25~ IP 5 1 (FORMERLY WOODSTONE INN DOES HEREBY PLAT THE SUBJECT PROPERTY AS LOT 1, SKY HOTEL SUBDIVISION/PD, AS DEPICTED LS-#2Q151 , CONDOMINIUMS " )1 1 , ta - Alli ~ BLOCK 112 . I . . \ 377 0'12" AND DESCRIBED HEREON; AND DOES HEREBY VACATE ALL EXISTING ENCROACHMENT , 1/13 69 i ~/ REI #248609) ~ 8 _622-ff- %4 --I- CERTIFICATES AND UCENSE AGREEMENTS, AS SHOWN ON SHEET 1 OF THIS PLAT; AND DOES ~ LOT /B - --EIRST AMENDED PIAT 0 f ~ 4 HEREBY DEDICATE AND ESTABLISH SURFACE AND SUBSURFACE EASEMENTS OVER AND UPON THE ~ DiTIBINEIk~UBDIVIS~A ~ 5 35~ 1 for 1 RATEAU DUMONT LODGE VICINITY MAP AREAS DESCRIBED AND DEPICTED ON SHEET 2 OF THIS PLAT AS "DRAINAGE EASEMENT, "PUBUC ~ REC#510 GPS-1 SCALE: 1"=2000' REC. #133329 ~m --1-* S. WESTEND S-[REE'AND E DURANT AVE. SURVEY NOTES ACCESS EASEMENT," "DRAINAGE AND UTILITY EASEMENT" AND 'NON-EXCLUSIVE EASEMENT FOR :101 08 / FOUND P.K. NAIL 41 AND SHINER ~ ~ tila~lore J PER 2009 MARCIN CONROL SURVEY INGRESS. EGRESS AND EMERGENCY ACCESS. FOR THE PURPOSES SO DESIGNATED ~ Â£07.t , aLLA L.S. 16129 1 1 Mr# V' AIDSHINE ~4-/4/01~0. ~~llp~~~~~~~i.AGG~~MAI~I~E :/,/TH~UCHA MONT LODGE K Â·07 Â£ \ FOUNDfÂ·K. NAIL 1) DATE OF FIELD WORK: MARCH - MAY 2014. UPDATED PER CITY REQUIREMENTS JULY 2015 EXECUTED THIS DAY OF , A.D., 2015. Â£074 AR~OFENCR ACHMENT LS. #i95984 - * Bl<.425. ,f~ ~4Â»9_413,420 1 2) DATE OF PREPARATION: MAY - JULY 2015 LECEFWITE FOR 6/OPY'/9 4 FLAG#bLES glIND[,6 INTO ROW ~ ~ f/// 4 PARCE,111- TO BE VACATE[> BY FOUND/1 NE 5 Â£ 04 1 - - 1-1115 : ANb SHINER \ LO 3) BASIS OF BEARING: A BEARING OF S 74'14'07" E BETWEEN CITY OF ASPEN GPS CONTROL MONUMENTS GPS-2 AND GPS-1. ASPEN CLUB LODGE PROPERTIES, LLC, A DELAWARE LIMITED LIABILITY COMPANY / 1, ~K#Gpa.232 - ~ 2 ~ FOUND P.K. NAILAND U.Ilih98 BOTH BRASS CAPS SET IN MONL,MENT BOXES AT THE APPROXIMATE INTERSECTIONS oF S. GALINA ST. AND E. DURANT AVE. AREA OF ENt,0*CHMEI~IT/ ~ ~ SHINER ~ 1 4. ~ AND S. WEST END ST.AND E. DURANTAVE., RESPECTIVELY. THIS BASIS OF BEARING IS CONSISTENT WITH THE MODIFIED STATE ~AGREEMEI'Â¥ ~oR AwNING ~ 4;;1 'I. L / , lie*' :% ...# / MEAN N77-15'~, 2 30' L.S iLLEGIBLE EXTEND,NG INTO ROW fpj' 4Â· Â· Â· < F EN(EftoACI~ME~ 1 1 I S. FOUND#5 REBARAND M.498 Pd.90 4~ : AGREEMEN~ FOR , , PLANE COORDINATE 5Y5TEM ACCORDING TO THE GPS CONTROL MONUMENTATION MAP PREPARED BY MARCIN , BLOCK 107 ALLEY BY: 1.25" CAP ENGINEERING, DATED DECEMBER 12, 2009 (REV. 2010). THE DESCRIPTIONS FOR ALL PROPERTIES SHOWN HEREON HAVE BEEN FOUND)#5 REBARAND {TITLE PARCEL Ill. ALL I r r / FOUNDAnON AND FOUND PK NAIL AND sHIdll 4 ~ (,j' ~ ' 20.0 ,ITS .5 #ILLEGIBLE WA Â¥ED BY THI P ) '67 1 RErAININGWAUS LS.#28643 6 , 0 1 ROTATED TO BE CONSISTENT WITH THIS BASIS OF BEARING. 125 CAP 8/425 PG.919 ' Tâ‚¬UND Y WITNESS CORNER 1 - j ' LS.#20151 (TITLE PARCEL"Â· To PK NAIL,*NONINNEH r J 'FOUND #5 REBAA AND 4) BASIS OF SURVEY: THE OFFICIAL MAP OF THE CITY OF ASPEN, PREPARED BY G.E. BUCHANAN, DATED 1959; VARIOU5 MAPS STATE OF COLORADO} ~...Lk_ BE VACATED 8,THIS ,5 23. 1128643 - /1 'fO,;â€ž 4 /1.25Â· PLAShICAP Gm / ~,i' 4,~ l, t.'Y / / ~11/ OF UTE ADDITION; THE MAP OF THE SOUTH ANNEXATION TO THE CITY OF ASPEN; THE MAP OF ASPEN ALPS RECORDED }SS. A - PLAT) / LS.W16129 ~ 8 JANUARY 8, 1964 (REC. #116906):THE GPS CONTROL MONUMENTATION MAP PREPARED BY MARCIN ENGINEERING, DATED COUNTY OF PITKIN } FOUND REBAR AND CAP 1 GLORY '6LE LS. #ILLEGIBLE DECEMBER 12, 2009 (REV. 2010); THE ALTA/ACSM LAND TITLE SURVEY OF WOODSTONE INN PREPARED BY ASPEN SURVEY J & 44.6 CONDOMIN~UMS - / / ./ 207-,v/ 202-0~ LOTA- 2,~~170 22-- . 0 f Re- ENGINEERS DATED JANUARY, 2013 UNDER JOB NO. 15335DDD; THE CONDOMINIUM MAP FOR THE WOODSTONE INN UTE AVENUE $#Â·:I. ':4 515'4 , # / ;3 =:29=%.L /-------- #510202); THE CONDOMINIUM MAP OF THE DURANT MALL RECORDED FEBRUARY 6, 1976(REC #181398); THE PLAT OF ~ 8 i REC.#154986 ;/ u,oUND P K NAIL CONDOMINIUMS (REC. #248609; THE FIRST AMENDED PLAT OF LITTLE NELL SUBDIVISION RECORDED MAY 17, 2005 (REC. THE FOREGOING INSTRUMENT WAS ACKNOWLEDGED BEFORE METHIS DAY OF (WIDTH VARIES) 46'P *9 6Â· '01 GAT 3 4 N 74 16'00 ,2015,BY AS OF FOUND #5 REBAR AND ASPENVALLEY P\- CHATEAU DUMONT LODGE RECORDED DECEMBER 19, 1968 (REC. #133329); THE CONDOMINIUM MAP OF ASPEN SQUARE ASPEN CLUB LODGE PROPERTIES, LLC 1.25"CAP LAND TRU5T LS.#20151 BK 282 PG~935 FOUND P.K NAIL 4.44' L N 739Ai'w '40, , 1 RECORDED DECEMBER 20, 1968 (REC. #133472); THE PLAT OF CHATEAU CHAUMONT LODGE RECORDED DECEMBER 16, 1968 26278' - *:fs (REC. #133420}; THE MAP OF GLORY HOLE CONDOMINIUMS RECORDED OCTOBER 31, 1972 (REC #154986); THE VARIOUS D SHIN~*dy CENTERUNEOF 12.OO WIDEEASEMENT -~9' 9 REC *3~Z365 WITNESS MY HAND AND OFFICIAL SEAL AGREEMENT FOR PRIVATE f .1 DOCUMENTS OF RECORD, AND THE FOUND MONUMENTS, AS SHOWN. FOUNDIREBAR AND MY COMMISSION EXPIRES 1,29 CAP ROADWAY/INGRESS/EGRESS GRANTED BY ~ ---- A5PEN ALP5 OWNERS TO HANS B. CANTRUP 5) THIS SURVEY DOES NOT CONSTITUTE A TITLE SEARCH BY SOPRIS ENGINEERING, LLC (SE) TO DETERMINE OWNERSHIP OR LS.#20151 FOUND P.K. NAIL .=ry (NOWSKYHOTEU S All / / EASEMENTS OF RECORD. FOR ALL INFORMATION REGARDING EASEMENTS, RIGHTS OF WAY AND/OR TITLE OF RECORD, SE ANDSHINER P 6. 8'327 PG.m . b LS. ItiEGIBLE pO D#5 REBARAND :,5 / RELIED UPON THE TITLE COMMITMENT PREPARED BY PITKi N COUNTY TiTLE, INC., UNDER CASE NO. PCT23970W3, DATED JUNE LOT 1 1 5 PLASTICCAP 9, 2015, AND THE ABOVE SAID FLATS AND MAPS DESCRIBED IN NOTE 4. NOTARY PUBLIC ASPEN UPS PUD/5UBDIVISION S #16129 r. I LOTZ -- L Â» 6) ALL RECORDING INFORMATION REFERENCED HEREIN IS PER THE Pm<IN COUNTY CLERK AND RECORDER S OFFICE, UNLESS ADDRESS REC.#619227 FOUND #5 REBAR 2 7 FOUND #5 REBARAND -----1.... ASPEN ALPS PUD/Sum*ION er INTERLINE OF 13,83' WIDCEASE NT {BENT) / 1.25" PLASTIC CAP 1 '" OTHERWISE NOTED. (ASPEN ALPS WEST) fs- ROADWA ESS/EGRES G ED 7) THE LINEAR UNIT USED IN THE PREPARATION OF THIS PLAT IS THE U.S. SURVEY FOOT AS DEFINED BY THE UNITED STATES REI.#619227 .ENT FOR PRIVATE L.S. ILLEGIBLE fri BY ASPEN ALPS 0 TOI NS 8. DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE, NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF STANDARDS AND TECHNOLOGY. CANTRUP (NOW SKY HOTEL B~327 PG.777 TITLE CERTIFICATE CITY ENG]NEER'S REVIEW THE UNDERSIGNED, A DULY-AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE OF PITKIN COUNTYTITLE COMPANY, INC., THIS FINAL PLAT OF SKY HOTEI SUBDIVISION/PD WAS REVIEWED FOR THE DEPICTION OF THE ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT REGISTERED TO DO BUSINESS IN PITKIN COUNTY, COLORADO, DOES HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THE SURVEY REQUIREMENTS THIS DAY OF ,2015. PERSONS LISTED AS OWNERS ON THIS MAP DO HOLD FEE SIMPLE TITLE TO THE REAL PROPERTY PLAT NOTES: DESCRIBED HEREIN, FREE AND CLEAR OF ALL UENS AND ENCUMBRANCES EXCEPT THOSE LISTED ON THE TITLE COMMITMENT ISSUED BY PITKIN COUNTY TrrLE, INC., UNDER CASE NO. PCT23970W3, 1) SKY HOTEL SUBDIVISION/PD HAS BEEN APPROVED PURSUANT TO THE PROVISIONS CONTAINED IN CITY ENGINEER DATEDJUNE 9,2015. ORDINANCE NO. 39 (5ERIES OF 2014), AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF ASPEN CITY COUNCIL GRANTING PLANNED DEVELOPMENT-PROJECT REVIEW APPROVAL FOR THE SKY HOTEL SUBDIVISION/PLANNED ALTHOUGH WE BELIEVE THE FACTS STATED ON THIS PLAT ARE TRUE, THIS CERTIFICATE IS NOT TO BE DEVELOPMENT, RECORDED FEBRUARY 12, 2015 AT RECEPTION NO. 617367; PURSUANT TO THE PROVISIONS CONSTRUED AS AN ABSTRACT OF TITLE, NOR AN OPINION OF TITLE, NOR A GUARANTY OF TITLE, AND CONTAINED IN RESOLUTION NO. - (SERIES OF -, A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF ASPEN PLANNING COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT APPROVAL IT IS UNDERSTOOD AND AGREED THAT PITKIN COUNTY TITLE, INC., NEITHER ASSUMES NOR WILL BE AND ZONING COMMISSION GRANTING PLANNED DEVELOPMENT-DETAILED REVIEW APPROVAL FOR THE SKY CHARGED WITH ANY FINANCIAL OBUGATION OR LIABILITY WHATSOEVER ON ANY STATEMENT HOTELSUBDIVISION/PLANNED DEVELOPMENT, RECORDED , 2015 AT RECEPTION NO. THIS FINAL PLAT OF SKY HOTEL SUBDIVISION/PD IS APPROVED BY THE CITY OF ASPEN COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENTTHIS CONTAINED HEREIN. - AS FURTHER DESCRIBED IN THE SKY HOTEL SUBDIVISION/PD DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT, DAY OF ,2015. RECORDED AT RECEPTION NO. . AND THE SKY HOTEL SUBDIVISION/PD APPROVED ASPEN CITY COUNCIL APPROVAL DEVELOPMENT PLAN SET, RECORDED AT RECEPTION NO. BY: DATE ,2015. THIS FINAL PLAT OF SKY HOTEL SUBDIVISION/PD IS APPROVED BY THE CITY OF ASPEN CiIY COUNCIL DIRECTOR 2) THE PUBLIC ACCESS EASEMENTS GRANTED BY THIS PLAT ARE INTENDED TO BE OVER AND ACROSS THE THIS DAY OF ,2015. SIDEWALKS AND STAIRWAYS TO BE CONSTRUCTED WITHIN LOT 1, SKY HOTEL, AS SHOWN ON SHEET 2 OF ADDRESS: STATE OF COLORADO ) THIS PLAT. PUBLIC ACCESS EASEMENTS WILL BE MORE SPECIFICALLY DESCRIBED AT THE TIME OF )SS CONDOMINIUMIZATION OF THE STY HOTEL SURVEYOR'SCERTIFICATE COUNTY OF PrrKIN ) MAYOR, STEVE SKADRON 3) KY HOTEL SUBDIVISION/PD ANTICIPATES ADDITIONAL PUBLIC AREAS WITHIN THE HOTEL BUILDING, FOR 1, MARK 5, BECKLER, A PROFESSIONAL LAND SURVEYOR LICENSED IN THE STATE OF COLORADO, HEREBY CERTIFY THAT IN THE TITLE CERTIFICATE WAS ACKNOWLEDGED BEFORE ME THIS DAY OF WHICH EASEMENTS WILL BE GRANTED, DEPICTED AND DESCRIBED AT THE TIME OF CONDOMINIUMIZATION A SURVEY OF THE HEREIN DESCRIBED PROPERTY WAS PERFORMED UNDER MY SUPERVISION AND DIRECTION, IN ACCORDANCE WITH COLORADO REVISED STATUTES 1973, TITLE 38, ARTICLE 51, AS AMENDED FROM TIME TO TIME, AND THAT THIS FINAL PLAT OF ASPEN ALPS SUB[MVISION/PD ACCURATELY AND SUBSTANTIALLY DEPICTS SAID SURVEY. ,2015, BY AS TITLE OFFICER OF OF THE SKY HOTEL 4) THE EFFECTIVE DATE OF THE "18.00' WIDE NON-EXCLU5IVE INGRESS/EGRESS EASEMENT FOR CHATEAU THE CONTROL SURVEY PRECISION IS GREATER THAN 1/15,000. RECORDED EASEMENTS, RIGHTS-OF-WAY AND RESTRICTIONS WITNESS MY HAND AND OFFICIAL SEAL CHAUMONT AND CHATEAU DUMONT AND EMERGENCY ACCESS EASEMENT," SHOWN ON SHEET 2 OF THIS ARE THO5E SET FORTH IN THE PROPERTY INFORMATION BINDERS REFERENCED IN SURVEY NOTE 5 HEREON. PLAT, SHALL BE THE DATE THAT THE SKY HOTEL RECEIVES A CERTIFICATE OF OCCUPANCY FROM THE CITY OF GRAPHIC SCALE ASPEN. '.~1.14.-..~M NOTARY PUBUC MARK S. BECKLER, PLS #28643 (IN FEET 1 linch=50 ft CLERK AND RECORDER'S ACCEPTANCE THIS FINAL PLAT OF SKY HOTEL SUBDIVISION/PD IS ACCEPTED FOR FILING IN THE OFFICE OF THE CLERK AND RECORDER OF SOPRIS ENGINEERING - LLC PITKIN COUNTY, COLORADO THIS DAY OF , 2015 IN PLAT BOOK - AT PAGE -, AS RECEPTION NO. CIVIL CONSULTANTS 502 MAIN STREET, SUITE A3 NonCE: ACCORD:NG TO COLORADO LAW YOU MUST COMMENCE ANY LEGAL PITKIN COUNT'f CLERK AND RECORDER ACTION B.UEDUPONANYDEFECTINTHISSURvrrwm,INâ„¢REEYEARS CARBONDALE, COLORADO 81623 AFTER YOU FIRST DISCOVER 5UCH DEFECT. IN NO EVENT MAY ANY ACnON BIASED UPON ANY DEFECT IN â„¢5 5URVEY BE COMMENCED MORE THAN TEN . 22:%2:ZkLQ@gzz22RR~::~~:~ FINAL PLAT OF: SKY HOTEL SUBDIVISION/PD A PARCEL OF LAND SITUATED IN THE NWh OF SECTION 18 TOWNSHIP 10 SOUTH, RANGE 84 WEST OF THE 6th P.M. GPS-2 S GALENA STREET AND E. DURANT AVE CITY OF ASPEN, COUNTY OF PITKIN, STATE OF COLORADO PER 2009 MARaN CONROL SURvEY 1 SHEET 2 OF 2 -,5,1.9~Â£25&231-113C E ~411- EXTERIOR BOUNDARY AND EASEMENTS DEDICATED BY THIS PLAT ~- -Â·- 3ES,FE~ ffty SHEET NOTES \ - 1) THE PUBLIC ACCESS EASEMENTS DEPICTED WITH THE FOLLOWING HATCH: - FO~I~~:E~~ - 1 DRAINAGE EASEMENT -- -1 1 DEDICATED BYTHISPLAT - I.#201/ 4.50' - - ARE GRANTED BY THIS PLAT SUBJECT TO PLAT NOTE 2, SHEET 1. NiP-227Â·W 23.52 GRANTED PER â„¢15 IAT \ PUBLICACCESS EUEMENT ---- .-- [SEE PLAT NOTE 2, SHEET 1) - L -' $74'10'DON 11619 & 1 / 18*71 - , Eli Â· U~)Â» f?95' \* 0(4lle 1 14\1 4 RO,VIENUE LO/1 Al-'â€¢TEA,1 ESS/EGRESS EASEMENT Y -it' D m -- I -6. FIRSTAMENDED PLATOF o PROPOSED BUILDING UTTLE NEU SUBDIVISION ~ FOOTPRINT AT E.10101 ' i (SEE -4144 4 f~ S. WEIrEND STREET AND E OURANTAVE SPR,VI~ , / 1 ~V PER 2009 MARCIN CONROL SURVEY & GROUND LEVEL 40@MEEr PLAT NOTE 4. SHE/13 k 1 , 'r PUBIC ACCE5S EASEMENT # _~1~ i ...tiet , {SEE PLAT NOTE 2. SHEET 1] l 5 4it i ~ ~ +24 221*E '4/NAGE CHATEAU IMONT LODGE ' , REC#133329 i i & f PER 7,&#9.* 3 il ill 142 5 - 5 00' WIDE D FOUND P 1 + i i ANDefer E:24 , It. N/L AND â„¢15 PLAT 1 %4 1 ' ' REC #133420 ' CHATEAU CHAUMONT LODGE LS 15129 Â« f , i / ".00. 1 / ' 6%1I ; & 30.00, / FOUND P 1 1 .Not,Ze LS ttlEGIBLE BLOCK 107 S 74'18'00- E 20-~' ~Ller - 8 *. NAIL LOT 1 .19/98 ,/ SKY HOTEL SUBDIVISION/PD - u 4 42,645 sq.fe - - * / 0.979 acrest PROPOSED BUILDING - PER THIS PLAT FOOTPRINT AT -- . 4., â€¢s,~ER, 7OUND PK MAIL ANDSHINEK 7 GROUND LEVEL U,nt:*# LS #28643 FOUND 3 WITNE55CORNER PK NAIL AND SHINER U.~28643 2 *-/5 GLORY HOLE CONDOMINIUMS REC#154986 Â·tx,~ 2 - -- 1 f ; I. I. ad 7/.2 S 15'42'00Â» W 6.42' 262.78' 5. ORIGINAL 5TREET .0,1, PUBLIC ACCESS EASEM ENT - 9% GINTED PER THIS PLAT - (SEE PLAT NOTE 2, SHEET 1) - ~CENTERUNEOF 12.00'WIDE EASEMENT AGREEMENT FOR PRIVATE - 1 FOUND P.K. INLAND ROADWAY/INGRESS/EGRESS GRANTED . SKEGBY HOLDINGS UMITED BY ASPEN ALPS OWNERS TO HANS 8, 0 Â· REC I382365 N 74 18'00 SHINERLS.#16129 - CANTRUP{NOW Sle, HOTEL) NI 227 PG.777 -9 - *.* - GRAPHIC SCALE LOT 1 80 LOT 2 \ 2~~~0~~M~~~~ ASPENALPS PUD/SUBDIVISION ASPEN ALPS PUD/SUBDIVISION (100 BLD) (ASPEN ALPS WEST) 4 REC. #619227 $*fip - \ *444, REC #619227 (IN FEET) CENTERUNE OF 13.83' WIDE FOUND #5 REBAR AND 47 EASEMENTAGREEMENT FOR PRIVATE -fl.25Â· linch.20 ft. ROADWAY/INGRESS/EGRESS GRANTED BY ASPEN ALPS OWNERS m HANS B. CANTRUP (NOW SKY HOTEL) BK.327 PG.777 SOPRIS ENGINEERING - LLC CIVIL CONSULTANTS 502 MAIN STREET, SUITE A3 NOTICE: ACCORDING TO COLORADO LAW YOU MUST COMMENCE Alin' LEGAL ACTION BASEDUPON ANY DEFECT . T.155URVEY WmliNâ„¢REEYEARS CARBONDALE, COLORADO 81623 AFTER YOU '1115Â·r D,5CCVER 5uc]4 OEFECT. 1. No EVENT MAY ANY ACTION ~ED uPON ANÂ¥ DEFECT iN â„¢Is .RV~ SE COMMENCED MORE â„¢~ TEN YEARS FROM â„¢E DATE OF CE#FiCAnON SHCWN HEREON. (970) 704-0311 14019.01 Cl 07/13/2015 S:\2014\14019'URVE, DWGS'URVEY PLOTS\14019_PLAT.DWG 3 4 11 f 3 ' Legal Tabs Co. 1-800-322-3022 @ Stock # DO-10-S RECEPTION#: 617367, 02 ' 0/2015 at 11:07:35 AM, 1 OF 14, R $--.00 Janice K. Vos Caudi- ?itkin County, CO EXHIBIT Ordinance No. 39 (SERIES OF 2014) AN ORDINANCE OF THE ASPEN CITY COUNCIL GRANTING CONCEPTUAL COMMERCIAL DESIGN REVIEW APPROVAL, CONDITIONAL USE APPROVAL, SPECIAL REVIEW APPROVAL, PLANNED DEVELOPMENT - PROJECT REVIEW APPROVAL, SUBDIVISION APPROVAL, TIMESHARE APPROVAL, AND GROWTH , MANAGEMENT APPROVALS, FOR A SITE SPECIFIC DEVELOPMENT PLAN FOR THE SKY HOTEL SUBDIVISION/PLANNED DEVELOPMENT LOCATED ON PROPERTY COMMONLY KNOWN AS 709 E DURANT AVENUE, CITY OF ASPEN, PITKIN COUNTY, COLORADO. Parcel ID: 2737-182-80-001 WHEREAS, the Community Development Department received an application for the Sky Hotel Subdivision/PD (the Application) from Aspen Club Lodge Properties, LLC I (Applicant), represented by Sunny Vann of Vann Associates for the following land use review approvals: â€¢ Planned Development - Project Review, pursuant to Land Use Code Chapter 26.445. â€¢ Timeshare Review, pursuant to Land Use Code Chapter 26.590. â€¢ Subdivision Review, pursuant to Land Use Code Chapter 26.480. â€¢ Growth Management Review - Replacement of Existing Commercial and Lodge Development, pursuant to Land Use Code Chapter 26.470. â€¢ Growth Management Review -Lodge Development, pursuant to Land Use Code Chapter 26.470. â€¢ Growth Management Review - New Free Market Residential Units, pursuant to Land Use Code Chapter 26.470. â€¢ Growth Management Review - Affordable Housing, pursuant to Land Use Code Chapter 26.470. â€¢ Special Review to establish Parking, pursuant to Land Use Code Chapter 26.430. â€¢ Conditional Use for commercial space, pursuant to Land Use Code Chapter 26.425. â€¢ Commercial Design Review, pursuant to Land Use Code Section 26.412; and, WHEREAS, all code citation references are to the City of Aspen Land Use Code in effect on the day of initial application- June 23,2014, as applicable to this Project; and, WHEREAS, the Application for the Sky Hotel Subdivision/PD initially proposed: â€¢ 102 hotel units with 102 keys and 103 bedrooms in 44,634 square feet of net livable area. â€¢ 3,380 square feet of accessory commercial net leasable space. â€¢ 8 free-market residential units (plus 4 lock-offs) in 14,622 square feet of net livable area. â€¢ 5 affordable housing units in 4,301 square feet of net livable area. City Council Ordinance No. 39, Series 2014 Page 1 of 14 RECEPTION#: 617367, 02~ -/2015 at 11:07:35 AM, 2 OF 14, Janice K. Vos Caudill, kin County, CO â€¢ 83 parking spaces (70 of which are in an underground facility, and 13 of which are at-grade spaces dedicated to the Aspen Alps.); and, WHEREAS, the Community Development Department received referral cornments from the Aspen Consolidated Sanitation District, City Engineering, Building Department Fire Protection District, Environmental Health Department, Parks Department, Parking Department, Aspen/Pitkin County Housing Authority, Public Works Department, and the Transportation Department as a result of the Development Review Committee meeting; and, WHEREAS, pursuant to Section 26.470.040.C.7, Affordable Housing, of the Land Use Code, a recommendation from the Aspen/Pitkin County Housing Authority is required and a recommendation for approval by the board was provided at their July 16, 2014, regular meeting; and, WHEREAS, said referral agencies and the Aspen Community Development Department reviewed the proposed Application and recommended approval with conditions; and, WHEREAS, pursuant to Chapter 26.445 of the Land Use Code, Planned Development - Project Review approval may be granted by the City Council at a duly noticed public hearing after considering recommendations by the Planning and Zoning Commission, the Community Development Director, and relevant referral agencies; and, WHEREAS, pursuant to Chapter 26.480 of the Land Use Code, Subdivision approval may be granted by the City Council at a duly noticed public hearing after considering recommendations by the Planning and Zoning Commission, the Community Development Director, and relevant referral agencies; and, WHEREAS, pursuant to Chapter 26.590 of the Land Use Code, Final Timeshare approval may be granted by the City Council at a duly noticed public hearing after considering recommendations by the Planning and Zoning Commission, the Coinmunity Development Director, and relevant referral agencies; and, WHEREAS, pursuant to Chapter 26.304, Common Development Review Procedures, and Section 26.304.060.B.4, Modification of Review Procedures, all other necessary land use reviews, as identified herein, have been combined to be considered by the City Council at a duly noticed public hearing after considering recommendations by the Planning and Zoning Commission, the Community Development Director, and relevant referral agencies; and, WHEREAS, such combination of review procedures was done to ensure clarity of review, was accomplished with all required public noticing provided as evidenced by an affidavit of public noticing submitted to the record, and the public was provided a thorough and full review of the proposed development; and, WHEREAS, the Planning and Zoning Commission reviewed the Application at a duly noticed public hearing on September 16, 2014, and continued to October 7, 2014 and October 21, 2014, during which the recommendations of the Community Development Director and comments from the public were requested and heard by the Planning and Zoning Commission ; and, WHEREAS, in response to feedback from the public, Community Development staff, and the Planning and Zoning Commission on October 7, 2014, the Applicant revised the proposal to include: City Council Ordinance No. 39, Series 2014 Page 2 of 14 RECEPTION#: 617367, 02 /2015 at 11:07:35 AM, 3 OF 14, Janice K. Vos Caudill, lin County, CO â€¢ 106 hotel units with 106 keys and 107 bedrooms in 47,092 square feet of net livable area. â€¢ 3,380 square feet of accessory commercial net leasable space. â€¢ 6 free-market residential units (plus 2 lock-offs) in 10,322 square feet of net livable area. â€¢ 5 affordable housing units in 4,301 square feet of net livable area. â€¢ 83 parking spaces (70 of which are in an underground facility, and 13 of which are at-grade spaces dedicated to the Aspen Alps.); and, WHEREAS, during a duly noticed public hearing on October 21, 2014, the Planning and Zoning Commission approved Resolution 15, Series of 2014, by a four to one (4-1) vote recommending City Council approve the Sky Hotel Subdivision/PD Application and all , necessary land use reviews, with conditions; and, WHEREAS, on November 24, 2014 the Aspen City Council approved Ordinance No. 39, Series 2014, on First Reading by a three to zero (3-0) vote; and, WHEREAS, the City Council reviewed the Application at a duly noticed public hearing on December 1, 2014, and continued to December 8,2014, January 12,2015, and February 9, 2015, during which the recommendations of the Community Development Director and comments from the public were requested and heard by the City Council; and, WHEREAS, in response to feedback from the public and City Council on December 1, 2014, the Applicant revised the proposal to include: â€¢ 104 hotel units, 104 keys and 117 bedrooms in 56,509 square feet of net livable area. â€¢ 3,480 square feet of commercial net leasable space. â€¢ 2 affordable housing units in 1,714square feet ofnet livable area. â€¢ 66.5 parking spaces (54 of which are in an underground facility, and 12.5 of which are at-grade spaces dedicated to the Aspen Alps.); and, WHEREAS, during a public hearing on February 9, 2015, the Aspen City Council approved Ordinance No. 39, Series 2014, by a four to zero (4-0) vote, approving with conditions the Sky Hotel Subdivision and all necessary land use reviews; and, WHEREAS, the Aspen City Council has reviewed and considered the development proposal under the applicable provisions of the Municipal Code as identified herein, has reviewed and considered the recommendation of the Planning and Zoning Commission, the Community Development Director, the applicable referral agencies, and has taken and considered public comment at a public hearing; and, WIIEREAS, the City Council finds that the development proposal meets or exceeds all applicable development standards and that the approval of the development proposal, with conditions, is consistent with the goals and elements of the Aspen Area Con~munity Plan; and, City Council Ordinance No. 39, Series 2014 Page 3 of 14 RECEPTION#: 617367, 02'--/2015 at 11:07:35 AM, 4 OF 14, Janice K. Vos Caudill tkin County, CO WHEREAS, the City Council finds that this Ordinance furthers and is necessary for the promotion of public health, safety, and welfare. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ASPEN AS FOLLOWS: Section 1: Approvals Pursuant to the procedures and standards set forth in Title 26 of the Aspen Municipal Code, the City Council hereby grants the Sky Hotel Planned Development - Proj ect Review approval, Subdivision approval, Final Timeshare approval, Growth Management approvals, Special Review approval, Conditional Use approval, and Conceptual Commercial Design approval, for a Site Specific Development Plan for the Sky Hotel Subdivision/PD, subject to the conditions of approval as listed herein. The dimensions shall be those as outlined in Exhibit A. Minor variations may be approved subject to review by the Community Development Department. The Conditional Use approval shall allow for restaurant, retail, service, and ski locker uses. Section 2: Effectiveness of Ordinance 4. Series 2015 The Sky Hotel project shall be subject to the provisions of Ordinance 4, Series 2015. Section 3: Subsequent Reviews Pursuant to the procedures and standards set forth in Title 26 of the Aspen Municipal Code, the Applicant is required to obtain Final Commercial Design Review and Plarmed Development - Detail Review following approval of the reviews outlined herein. The applicant shall combine these applications, and they shall be made no later than one (1) year following approval of this Ordinance. Section 4: Timeshare Lodge Requirements A public rental requirement assuring that unused timeshare lodge rooms will be available to the general public. Such rental requirement shall be documented in the Sky Hotel Timeshare Documents and shall contain a provision that this requirement cannot be eliminated from the Condominium Declarations without approval from the City of Aspen City Council. Periodic "' audits, pursuant to Section 26.575.210, Lodge occupancy auditing, of the 1-.and Use Code may be conducted. Section 5: Growth Management Allotments 5.1 Reconstruction Credits. Based on the existing Sky Hotel development, the Applicant is entitled to the following reconstruction credits, pursuant to Land Use Chapter 26.470. - a. A total of 90 lodging bedrooms, equating to 180 lodge pillows, is credited toward the Project. b. A commercial reconstruction credit of 5,259 square feet of net leasable area is credited toward the Project. 5.2 Growth Management Allotments. The following growth management allotments are recommended to be granted to the Sky Hotel Project: a. 27 lodging bedrooms = 54 lodging pillows. Added to the reconstruction credits, the project represents 107 lodging bedrooms or 214 pillows, r City Council Ordinance No. 39, Series 2014 Page 4 of 14 RECEPTION#: 617367, 02" 72015 at 11:07:35 AM, 5 OF 14, Janice K. Vos Caudill, ckin County, CO b. 2 units of affordable housing. Section 6: Affordable Housing 6.1 Mitigation Requirements. The project is proposed to include two (2) affordable housing rental units, including one (1) one-bedroom unit and one (1) two-bedroom unit. The mitigation required for the project is as follows: Lodwe: Mitigate for the additional 27 lodge bedrooms @ 48.6% 27 lodge bedrooms * 0.6 FTEs = 16.2 FTEs generated 16.2 FTEs generated by lodge - 8 FTE commercial credit = 8.2 FTEs generated 8.2 FTEs @ 48.6% mitigation = 3.98 FTEs required mitigation for lodge ' The proposed affordable housing units will provide housing for 4 FTEs, exceeding the mitigation requirement by 0.02 FTEs. 6.2 Affordable Housing Special Review. Special Review is granted for the finished floor level of the affordable housing units such that at least fifty percent (50%) of the finished fioor of the units shall be located at or above finished grade. 6.3 Affordable Housing Conditions. The two (2) affordable housing units shall be deed restricted - at Category 3, and shall meet the following conditions: a. The affordable housing units shall meet or exceed the minimum square footage for Category 3. b. The deed restriction shall be recorded for the affordable housing units prior to Certificate of Occupancy (CO) of the affordable housing units. The CO for the affordable housing units shall be issued at the same time or prior to the CO for the lodge, free-market residential units, and commercial space. c. All tenants shall be approved by APCHA prior to occupancy. d. Employees of the hotel shall be exempt from maximum assets and maximum income for the on-site units; however, the tenants shall not own any other property within the ownership exclusion zone and must work full time as defined in the APCHA Guidelines. e. Minimum occupancy shall be obtained for each unit, as defined in the APCHA Guidelines. f. The units shall not be vacant for longer than 45 days, unless APCHA notified as to why the unit has been left vacant. g. Washers and dryers shall be provided in each employee housing unit. h. Each affordable housing unit shall be assigned one parking space in the underground garage, and they shall not be the stacked spaced. City Council Ordinance No. 39, Series 2014 Page 5 of 14 RECEPTION#: 617367, 02'--/2015 at 11:07:35 AM, 6 OF 14, Janice K. Vos Caudill tkin County, CO i. The affordable housing units shall be rental units. The Condominium Declaration shall include language, to be reviewed and approved by APCHA, that should the affordable housing units become ownership units: a. They will be sold through the lottery system. b. The dues will be based on the assessed value of the deed-restricted units vs. the free-market unit as well as the square footage of the units; c. No common expenses will be charged to the deed-restricted owners, unless approved by APCHA. d. A separate HOA shall be created for the deed-restricted employee housing units. Section 7: Planned Development - Detail Review In addition to the general docuinents required as part of a Planned Development - Detail Review, , the following items shall be required as part of the Application's Planned Development - Detail Review: a. An Outdoor Lighting Plan, pursuant to section 26.575.150. b. An existing and proposed Landscaping Plan, identifying trees with diameters and values. c. A draft Construction Management Plan. d. A snow storage and snow shedding plan. Snow is not permitted to shed off roofs onto neighboring properties. Demonstrate that any snow which sheds off roofs will remain on-site. e, An updated and final Transportation Impact Analysis (TIA), including a monitoring plan. f. A final design plan for the Spring Street cul-de-sac and bump out, as outlined in Section 9.5 ofthis Ordinance. Section 8: Subdivision/PD Plat and Agreement The Applicant shall submit a Subdivision/PD agreement (hereinafter "Agreement") that meets the requirements of the Land Use Code within 180 days of final approval. The 180 days shall commence upon the granting of Final Commercial Design and Planned Development - Detail Review approvals by the Planning & Zoning Commission. The recordation documents shall be submitted in accordance with the requirements of Section 26.490 Approval Documents of the Land Use Code. a. In accordance in Section 26.490.040, Approval Documents Content and Form, the ) following plans are required in the Approved Plan Set: 1. Final Commercial Design Review/ Architectural Character Plan. 2. Planned Development Project and Detail Review Plans. 3. Public Amenity Plans. 4. Public Infrastructure Plan. 5. Final Transportation Impact Analysis (TIA), including a monitoring plan. 6. Subdivision Plat (the subdivision plat shall show a non-exclusive easement for ingress and egress across the easterly portion of the Applicant's property between Durant Avenue and the alley in Block 107, for the use of Chateau Chaumont and Chateau DuMont condominiums) b. In accordance with Section 26.490.050, Development Agreements, a Development Agreement shall be entered into with the City. City Council Ordinance No. 39, Series 2014 Page 6 of 14 RECEPTION#: 617367, 02" /2015 at 11:07:35 AM, 7 OF 14, Janice K. Vos Caudill, ikin County, CO c. In accordance with Section16.490.060. Financial and Site Protection Requirements, the applicant shall provide a site protection guarantee and a site enhancement guarantee. d. In accordance with Section 26.490,070, Pedbrmance Guarantees, the following guarantees are required in an amount equal to 150% of the current estimated cost of the improvement: 1. Landscape Guarantee. 2. Public Facilities and Public Infrastructure Guarantee. 3. Storm Water and Drainage Improvements Guarantee. The timeshare docs and condo map referenced e. and f., below, shall not be prepared until substantial completion of construction and should not be included in the 180 day deadline. They will be required prior to CO. e. In accordance with Section 26.590, Timeshare, the Applicant shall incorporate the requirements and restrictions of the City's Timeshare Regulations into the final timeshare instruments, including: 1. State requirements, 2. Owner occupancy limitations and disclosure of the public rental requirement, 3. Provisions for reserve funds for ongoing maintenance, 4. Prohibited practices and uses, 5. Limits on marketing techniques, 6. A prohibition against long-term storage of owner vehicles, and 7. Prohibitions on offering non-Aspen gifts within a marketing plan. f. A Condominium Map shall be competed for the development in accordance with Section 26.480.050(A), Condominiumization. The Condominium Map shall depict the non-exclusive easement described in Section 8.a.6. Section 9: Engineering Department The Applicant's design shall be compliant with all sections of the City of Aspen Municipal Code, Title 21 and all construction and excavation standards published by the Engineering Department. 9.1 Drainage: The project shall meet the Urban Runoff Management Plan Requirements. A compliant drainage plan, including a 100-year mudflow analysis, must be submitted with a building permit application. A variance request will not be granted for exclusion of WCQV for Basin 8D. An inflow control mechanism could be proposed to limit the runoffthat enters the BMP and allow any access runoff from offsite to bypass the structure. The vault access doors are proposed on the sidewalk at the hotel entrance. To improve the pedestrian ' experience, cover or hide the access lids or place them on the side of the sidewalk rather than the center. City Council Ordinance No. 39, Series 20 14 Page 7 of 14 RECEPTION#: 617367, 0~'-'-/2015 at 11:07:35 AM, 8 OF 14, Janice K. Vos Caudill tkin County, CO 9.2 Sidewalk/Curb/Gutter: All sidewalk curb and gutter shall meet the Engineering Standards of City of Aspen Municipal Code Title 21. Pedestrian and vehicular traffic shall be distinguished in the alley. 9.3 Excavation Stabilization: Due to the proximity of the neighboring property and the excavation of the building, an excavation stabilization plan shall be submitted to the Engineering Department prior to building permit submittal. 9.4 CMP: a, The Construction Management Plan shall describe mitigation for parking, staging/encroachments, and truck traffic. b. The applicant will work with neighboring properties, including the Chateau Chaumont and Chateau Du Mont ("Neighbors") to obtain their input in the Construction Management Plan ("CMP") for the new Sky Hotel prior to presenting the CMP to the City of Aspen. The CMP will include the appointment of a specific construction team person as the contact for all Neighbors' questions and suggestions regarding the construction process. Neighbors desire uninterrupted access to the units and parking spaces within their condominiums. Applicant shall use good faith efforts to minimize interruptions for access for condominium owners and guests to the units and parking spaces within the condominiums. Applicant shall limit the most disruptive alley work directly in front of the Neighbors' condominium buildings to April 15 through June 15 and October 1 to November 20 of each year. The specific hours and details for access will be determined in the CMP. In recognition of the fact that the Neighbors' properties are immediately adjacent and very near the Sky Hotel, the CMP shall provide for real and significant noise and dust control measures. For example, , watering exposed areas as reasonably necessary to suppress dust during all times of excavation, and the provision of physical sound barriers between the construction site and the Neighbors' properties to be erected prior to commencement of excavation and construction activities in order to mitigate sound impacts. These neighborhood agreements are intended to augment, rather than supersede City of Aspen construction regulations 9.5 Traffic Flow: The applicant shall address the cut-de-sac design and the Spring Street bump out as part of the Detail PD Review. The Spring Street cul-de-sac area and final design will require approval from Aspen Fire District, which may or may not require additional improvements to the cul-de-sac. The alley direction shall remain the same as today - entry from Durant and exit onto Original. Section 10: Fire Mitigation All codes adopted by the Aspen Fire Protection District shall be met. This includes but is not limited to access (International Fire Code (IFC), 2003 Edition, Section 503), approved fire sprinkler and fire alarm systems (IFC, as amended, Section 903 and 907). The subgrade garage shall have adequate fire access. This shall be reviewed and approved by the Fire Marshall. Section 11: Parks Department City Council Ordinance No. 39, Series 2014 Page 8 of 14 RECEPTION#: 617367, 02 /2015 at 11:07:35 AM, 9 OF 14, Janice K. Vos Caudill, tkin County, CO Tree removal permits are required prior to issuance of a building permit for any demolition or significant site work. Mitigation for removals must be met by paying cash in lieu, planting on site, or a combination of both, pursuant to Chapter 13.20 of the City Municipal Code. Any plantings on the roof shall not qualify as mitigation. The applicant shall explore potential sites around the property to allow full maturation of trees. This shall be included as part of the PD Detail Review. A tree protection plan indicating the drip lines of each individual tree or groupings of trees remaining on site shall be included in the building permit application for any demolition or significant site work. The plan shall indicate the location of protective zones for approval by the City Forester and prohibit excavation, storage of materials, storage of construction backfill, 2 storage of equipment, and access over or through the zone by foot or vehicle. Section 12: Aspen Consolidated Sanitation District Requirements Service is contingent upon compliance with the District's rules, regulations, and specifications, which are on file at the District office. ACSD will review the approved Drainage plans to assure that clear water connections (roof, foundation, perimeter, patio drains) are not connected to the sanitary sewer system. On-site sanitary sewer utility plans require approval by ACSD. Permanent improvements are prohibited in sewer easements or right of ways. Landscaping plans will require approval by ACSD where soft and hard landscaping may impact public ROW or easements to be dedicated to the district. Old service lines must be excavated and abandoned at the main sanitary sewer line according to specific ACSD requirements and prior to micropiling. Soil nails are not allowed in rights of way. One tap is allowed for each building. Shared service line agreements may be required where more than one unit is served by a single service line. Below grade development may require installation of a pumping system. Above grade development shall flow by gravity. Plumbing plans for the pool and spa areas require approval of the drain size by the district. Glycol snowmelt and heating systems must have containment provisions and must preclude discharge to the public sanitary sewer system. Oil and Grease interceptors are required for all new and remodeled food processing establishments. Oil and Sand separators are required for public vehicle parking garages and vehicle maintenance facilities. Driveway entrance drains shall not be routed to ACSD's sanitary sewer infrastructure but rather be mitigated in accordance with the City of Aspen's Urban Runoff Management Plan. Elevator shafts drains must flow thru Oil and Sand interceptor. Plans for interceptors, separators and containment facilities require submittal by the applicant and approval prior to a building permit application. Where additional development would produce flows that would exceed the planned reserve capacity of the existing system (collection system and or treatment system) an additional proportionate fee will be assessed to eliminate the downstream collection system or treatment City Council Ordinance No. 39, Series 2014 Page 9 of 14 RECEPTION#: 617367, 02 /2015 at 11:07:35 AM, 10 OF 14, Janice K. Vos Caudill, kin County, CO capacity constraint. Additional proportionate fees would be collected over time from all development in the area of concern in order to fund the improvements needed. Where additional development would produce flows that would overwhelm the planned capacity of the existing collection system and or treatment facility, the development will be assessed fees to cover the costs of replacing the entire portion of the system that would be overwhelmed. The District would fund the costs of constructing reserve capacity in the area of concern (only for the material cost difference for larger line). The Applicant shall furnish average and peak flows as well as service size prior to final design. The district will be able to respond with more specific comments and requirements once detailed building and utility plans are available. All ACSD total connection fees must be paid prior to the issuance of a building permit. Amendments to the above requirements agreed to in writing by the Applicant and the Aspen Consolidated Sanitation District shall supersede the sanitation requirements listed herein. Section 13: Environmental Health Department 13.1 Environmental Health Codes: The State of Colorado mandates specific mitigation requirements with regard to asbestos. Additionally, code requirements to be aware of when filing a building permit include: a prohibition on engine idling, regulation of fireplaces, fugitive dust requirements, noise abatement and pool designs. 13.2 Trash Requirements: The trash enclosures shall meet the minimum requirements outlined in Title 12. Prior to Detail PD Review, the Applicant shall identify the type of door to be installed on the trash enclosures for review and approval by the Environmental Health Department. Trash and deliveries shall be located off the Alley, as represented in plans _ presented to City Council. 13.3 Deliveries and Trash Removal: In the alley in Block 102, all deliveries and trash removal to and from the new Sky Hotel will occur between the hours of 8:00 a.m. and 7:00 p.m. except under the following circumstances: â€¢ Heavy snowfalls, acts of God, and force majeure â€¢ Food & Wine Classic, in which case, for 3 days prior to the event, these timelines may be exceeded to include the following hours: 7:00 a.m. to 10:00 p.m. â€¢ X-Games, in which case, for 3 days prior to the event these timelines may be exceeded to include the following hours: 7:00 a.m. to 10:00 p.m. â€¢ Christmas, in which case, for 3 days prior to Christmas Eve, these timelines may be exceeded to include the following hours: 7:00 a.m. to 10:00 p.m. â€¢ New Years, in which case, for 3 days prior to New Years' Eve, these timelines may be exceeded to include the following hours: 7:00 a.m. to 10:00 p.m. There shall be only two service doors at the delivery and trash removal area. Applicant shall schedule deliveries and trash removal at the Sky Hotel so that the alley in Block 102 is not unreasonably blocked by vehicles servicing the Sky Hotel, whether parked or waiting for other service vehicles to vacate the service bays. There shall be no unreasonable City Council Ordinance No. 39, Series 2014 Page ]O of 14 RECEPTION#: 617367, 02'--/2015 at 11:07:35 AM, 11 OF 14, Janice K. Vos Caudill tkin County, CO parking or idling of delivery or service vehicles in the access area between the alley in Block 102 and Durant Avenue on the Sky Hotel property adjacent to the Neighbors. The requirements of Paragraph 13.3 shall take effect upon the issuance of the Final Certificate of Occupancy for the newly constructed Sky Hotel. 13.4 Noise Reauirements: The Applicant shall be required to install a sound system to accommodate the acoustic needs for day-to-day operations as well as special events. Outside events are not permitted to bring in their own sound equipment, unless approved by the City through a Temporary Use Approval or a Special Events Pennit. Noise levels shall meet City requirements at all times. The applicant shall explore an engineered solution that does not require additional noise paneling. If an engineered solution is not achievable, removable transparent panels of no more than 4.5 feet in height (from the point of attachment) shall be permitted on the second floor and rooftop decks to help abate noise. These shall be removed within 24 hours following an event. In the event the removable panels are required for back-to-back events, they may be up for no longer than seven (7) continuous days. The Applicant shall meet with representative from the Community Development and Environmental Health Departments prior to submission of the main building permit to review the engineered solution options and evaluate the need for the noise panels referenced herein. The Sky Hotel will satisfy all of the time and decibel levels as required by the City regulations, as the same may be amended from time to time. Notwithstanding City Code limitations, the decibeI level at the property Iine between the Sky Hotel and the Skegby Residence, as measured by the City of Aspen Enforcement Officer, shall not exceed 60 dB- A; and the decibel level at the property line between the Sky Hotel and the Neighbors shall not exceed 60 dB-A measured from the southwest corner of the Chateau Chaumont property line and the southwest comer of the 3rd floor courtyard balcony. In both cases such measurements shall be made using a sound level meter with the "A" weighting scale, set on "slow" response at any time there is activity on the roof top of the Sky Hotel. The noise level shall be assessed by taking numerous measurements over a number of minutes, and averaging those readings. The sound level meters must meet Type 2 specifications, according to ANSI S 1.4-2014 (or most current edition), and that sound level meter should be checked prior to measurements with a field calibrator. The noise measured must actually originate from the Sky Hotel. Any measurement must take into account and consider other background noises as required by the City code at the time of the event and measurement. All activity (except for the limited purposes of cleaning and removal of sound barriers) on the roof top areas of the Sky Hotel shall cease at the earlier of 10:00 pm or the time provided in the City regulations for the cessation of outdoor amplified music unless a Special Event Permit is obtained from the City by the Sky Hotel. There shall be no more than 15 Special Events per year for which Applicant or the Sky Hotel applies to the City for activity on the rooftop areas, and in no case shall Special Event activity on the roof top continue beyond 11:00 p.m. on any night. Provided, however, removal of sound barriers may be permitted to take place after the conclusion of any special event. Sound barriers will be limited to the areas shown on the plans dated January 26, 2015 submitted by the City Council L Ordinance No. 39, Series 2014 Page 11 of 14 RECEPTION#: 617367, 02'-'-/2015 at 11:07:35 AM, 12 OF 14, Janice K. Vos Caudill tkin County, CO Applicant. The requirements of this section (Part 13.4) shall take effect upon the issuance of the Final Certificate of Occupancy for the newly constructed Sky Hotel. Section 14: Transportation Department The applicant shall implement the TDM and MMLOS mitigation measures, as outlined in the application. CMP and TMP should be mindful of Rubey Park construction scheduled for spring- fall of 2015. Any closures/re-routes of Durant Street will need to be coordinated with this project. Regardless of construction date, closures/impacts to Durant Street should be limited and coordinated well in advance with RFTA and the public. An updated TIA is required at the PD- Detail Review and shall include a monitoring plan. Section 15: Parking 15.1 Fire Lane: The new cut-in loading zone on Spring shall continue to be a public loading zone ' for goods and passengers and the balance of Spring Street must remain a Fire Lane. 15.2 Required Parking: A total of fifty-four (54) spaces shall be provided in the sub-grade parking garage, seven (7) of which are stacked spaces. The project generated a requirement of forty-one (41) parking spaces. 15.3 Parking Garage Use: All spaces in the parking garage shall be limited to use by guests, tenants, and users of the Project. with the exception that up to thirteen (13) parking spaces in the parking garage may be made available to Chateau DuMont on a space available basis as determined by the Sky Hotel General Manager. Long-term car storage by any user of the garage shall be prohibited, 15.4 Affordable Housing Parking: Each affordable housing unit shall be assigned a parking space in the parking garage. These shall be located in a regular, non-stacked, parking space. Long-term storage of vehicles that are owned or used by the affordable housing tenants is permitted. Section 16: Water/Utilities Department The Applicant shall comply with the City of Aspen Water System Standards, with Title 25, and with the applicable standards of Title 8 (Water Conservation and Plumbing Advisory Code) of the Aspen Municipal Code, as required by the City of Aspen Water Department. All Water System Distribution standards in place at the time of building pemit shall apply, and all tap fees will be assess per applicable codes and standards. Utility placement and design shall meet adopted City of Aspen standards. Section 17: Outdoor Lighting and Signage All outdoor lighting and all signage shall meet the requirements ofthe Aspen Municipal Code. Section 18: Public Amenitv Spaces The Applicant has committed to providing a total of 12,408 sq ft of public amenity space (3,113 sq ft at grade, 1,553 sq ft on a second floor deck, and 7,742 sq ft on the roof top deck). These spaces shall be permanently accessible by the public through stairs and/or elevators. These spaces shall not be enclosed with temporary or permanent walls/windows or otherwise enclosed City Council Ordinance No. 39, Series 2014 Page 12 of 14 RECEPTION#: 617367, 02/ '2015 at 11:07:35 AM, 13 OF 14, Janice K. Vos Caudill, lin County, CO as interior conditioned space, with the exception of the noise barriers referenced in Section 13.3. Approved Public Amenity space on the roof shall be subject to a public access easement. Section 19: Building Department The Applicant shall meet all applicable building and accessibility codes in place at the time of building permit. The elevator accessing the roof is required to meet IBC accessibility requirements. The ground floor affordable housing units shall be provided with a compliant circulation path within the site that connects the units to the parking and the public right of way. Section 20: All material representations and commitments made by the Applicant pursuant to the development proposal approvals as herein awarded, whether in public hearing or documentation presented before the Planning and Zoning Commission or City Council, are hereby incorporated in such plan development approvals and the same shall be complied with as if fully set forth herein, unless amended by an authorized entity. Section 21: This Ordinance shall not affect any existing litigation and shall not operate as an abatement of any action or proceeding now pending under or by virtue of the ordinances repealed or amended as herein provided, and the same shall be conducted and concluded under such prior ordinances. Section 22: If any section, subsection, sentence, clause, phrase, or portion of this Ordinance is for any reason held invalid or unconstitutional in a court of competent jurisdiction, such portion shall be deemed a separate, distinct and independent provision and shall not affect the validity of the remaining portions thereof. INTRODUCED, READ AND ORDERED PUBLISHED as provided by law, by the City Council of the City of Aspen on the 25th day of November, 2014. -- ~244,/4- (Steven ~~ron Mayor 4r#ST: kA * (Vlk,h Aultl.* LMAa Manning, City Clerk FINALLY, adopted, passed anki approved this 9th day of February, 2015. ' APPROVED AS TO FORM: ApPWOVED 4 Tgyâ‚¬Â°Trf : ( 0-$.ZE~--- - Jades R. True, City Attorney Steven Skarlron, MYor City Council t Or~inance No. 39, Series 2014 Page 13 of 14 RECEPTION#: 617367, 02 /2015 at 11:07:35 AM, 14 OF 14, Janice K. Vos Caudill tkin County, CO ATTEST: Clt(Lg,~C~~~h~ ~ ATTACHMENTS: Exhibit A: Approved Dimensional Requirements Exhibit A: Approved Dimensional Requirements 104 units and 117 bedrooms in Lodge Units and Net livable 56,509 sq ft net livable Commercial Net Leasable 3,480 sq ft net leasable Affordable Housing Units and Net Livable 2 units in 1,714 sq ft net livable Minimum Gross Lot Size (sq ft) 42,645 sq ft Minimum Net Lot Size (sci ft) 37,113 sq ft Minimum Net Lot Area per Free-Market dwelling unit 4,864 sq ft (sq ft) Minimum Lot Width (feet) 116 ft Minimum Front Yard Setback (feet) Above Grade - 10 ft Below Grade - 5 ft Above Grade - 6.4 ft East Wing; 2.8 ft Minimum East Side Yard Setback (feet) West Wing Below Grade - 10 ft Minimum West Side Yard Setback (feet) Above Grade - 13 ft Below Grade - 5 ft Minimum Rear Yard Setback (feet) Above Grade - 5 ft Below Grade - 5 ft Maximum Height (feet) 40 feet Maximum Height for mechanical 50 feet Public Amenity Space 11,798 sq ft (27.6%) Allowed Floor Area* Overall 91,552 sq ft (2.46:1}* Lodge 72,781 sq ft (1.96:1) Commercial 3,460 sq ft (.09:1) Affordable Housing 1,876 sq ft (.05:1) Parking Garage: 54 Spaces Minimum Off-Street Parking Surface Spaces: 12.5 spaces for Aspen Alps Minimum Trash/Recycle Area 560 sq ft *Minor changes during PD - Detail Review and/or building permit review may be approved such that they do not exceed those in the underlying zone district City Council Ordinance No. 39, Series 2014 Page 14 of 14 j j 9 4 Legal Tabs Co. 1-800-322-3022 Â© Stock#DO-10-S 5 t , -1 Legal Tabs Co. 1-800-322-3022 * Stock#DO-10-S RECEPTI : 621405, 07/09/2015 at 11:14:21 AM, 1 OF 2, R $16.00 Doc Codel Janice K. Vos Caudill, Pitkil~ 1 4 NOTICE OF APPROVAL FOR ADMINISTRATIVE PLANNED DEVELOPMENT - PROJECT REVIEW AMENDMENT FOR THE PROPERTY LOCATED AT 709 E DURANT AVE (THE SKY HOTEL), CITY OF ASPEN, PITKIN COUNTY, COLORADO. Parcel ID: 2737-182-80-001 APPLICANT: Aspen Club Lodge Properties, LLC REPRESENTATIVE: Scott McHale, Rowland + Broughton Architects Sunny Vann, Vann Associates SUBJECT & SITE OF AMENDMENT: The Sky Hotel is zoned Lodge (L) and includes a Planned Development (PD) Overlay. The PD was approved in Ordinance 39, Series of 2014 as part of an application for redevelopment of the property. '1 his is an administrative PD - Project ) Review Amendment to correct the setbacks included in Ordinance 39, Series o f 2014. BACKGROUND AND PROJECT SUMMARY: The Sky Hotel received approval fioom City Council (Ordinance 39, Series 2014) on February 9,2015 to redevelop the property with a new lodge. Part ofthe initial application included a request to vary the setbacks allowed in the Lodge zone district. ln December of 2014, the applicant rescinded this request and provided updated drawings to illustrate that the building would ineet the setbacks allowed in the Lodge zone district, While the drawings were updated, Exhibit A to the Ordinance was not. Exhibit A includes all of the approved dimensions for the project. Section 1 of Ordinance 39, Series 2014, states, in part, that "The dimensions shall be those outlined in Exhibit A. Minor variations may be approved subject to review by the Community Development Department," The applicant has requested that the Community Development Department approve a "minor variation" to the setbacks included in Ordinance 39's Exhibit A to ensure the approved dimensions match the approved drawings. The correct setbacks should be as follows: MINIMUM SETBACKS Above Grade East Side Yard, West Wing - 5 Feet East Side Yard, East Wing - 6.4 Feet West Side Yard - 5 Feet Below Grade East Side Yard, East Wing - 5 Feet East Side Yard, West Wing - 5 Feet All other setbacks - As included in Exhibit A to Ordinance 39, Series 2014 Sky Hotel, Ordinance 39 (Series 2014) Project Review Amendment Page 1 of 2 STAFF EVALUATION: The proposed building is ideiitical to tliat approved by City Council in Ordinance 39, Series 2014. An administrative error resulted in Exhibit A not being updated to match the final approved drawings. This is a technical error that does not change the overall project or approval by City Council. The Ordinance provides the Community Development Department the ability to make minor modifications to the dimensional requirements administratively. In addition, the setbacks meet those allowed in the Lodge zone district. DECISION: The Community Development Director finds the proposed PD Amendment is consistent with the applicable review criteria and thereby, APPROVES the amendment. The revised setbacks are as follows: Above Grade - 10 ft Minimum Front Yard Setback (feet) Below Grade - 5 ft Above Grade, West Wing - 5 ft Minimum East Side Yard Setback (feet) Above Grade, East Wing-6.4 ft Below Grade - 5 ft Above Grade - 5 ft Minimum West Side Yard Setback (feet) Below Grade - 5 ft Above G rade - 5 ft Minimum Rear Yard Setback (feet) Below Grade - 5 ft APPROVED BY: -9/fao Jennifer Philph Date / Community Development Deputy Director Sky Hotel. Ordinance 39 (Series 2014) Project Review Amenclment Page 2 0 f 2 Sunny Vann rom: Jesse Swann <jswann@sopriseng.com> Sent: Thursday, July 09, 2015 10:58 AM To: Valerie Alexander Yaw CC: Audrey McLaughlin; Scott McHale; vannassociates@comcast.net Subject: Re: sky hotel I clarification request I will take out all onsite improvements from our guarantee. Yes, $8/sf will be sufficient for the installation of a broom finished concrete sidewalk. Also, I spoke with Yancy and he felt that $1.5/sf would cover the cost of seeding and temporary irrigation. I will follow up with our revised guarantees. Regards, Jesse K. Swann, P.E. Project Manager Sopris Engineering, LLC 970-704-0311 rom: "Valerie Alexander Yaw" <valerie@bluegreenaspen.com> o: "Jesse Swann" <jswann@sopriseng.com> Cc: "Audrey Mclaughlin" <audrey@bluegreenaspen.com>, "Scott McHale" <scott@rowlandbroughton.com>, vannassociates@comcast.net Sent: Thursday, July 9, 2015 9:07:06 AM Subject: RE: sky hotel I clarification request Thanks Jesse Audrey and I considered this yesterday as well. We thought that there was adequate space (though not 8') from face of proposed curb to property line (5.5') that the City would be able to install a sidewalk via the bond monies as they see fit. If you think this is 'pushing it' we will hold the value of the proposed sidewalk in our guarantee value to honor the assumptions. It looks like the concrete sidewalk value is $8/SF if we should carry that portion.. Val val yaw I asia I pia I leedAP bluegreen , 300 south spring street I suite 202 aspen. colorado 81611 t 970 429 7499 I f 970 429 9499 toll free 877 429 7499 ~ww.blue@reenaspen.com 1 EXHIBIT Sky Hotel Redevelopment-Planned Deveiopment Detailed Review Engineering Report for Sky Hotel Redevelopment Planned Development Detailed Review Submitted To: City of Aspen i Engineering Department 517 E. Hopkins St. Aspen, CO 81611 Prepared by: Sopris Engineering, LLC 502 Main Street Suite A3 Carbondale, Colorado 81623 SE Project Number: 14040 July 14,2015 b /1 ; Â·;*Suxxx~Q 4 <:0 ..... 1/ p > Hblf #r D ....c:t Nje Â· 410<A ~%06Â·/ f krk# V 2/7 28377 j ~ It%11/. , 7 1%6 :10744f Â·446â‚¬1'NAL $$6 %44,41- Sky Hotel Redevelopment-Planned Development Detailed Review July 14, 2015 Table of Contents A. Purpose of Report 7 B. Backgroundâ€ž 2 C. Project Summary 9 D. Application Updates 2 E, Site Utilities 3 F. Drainage Analysis 5 G. Existing and Proposed Acceqq 14 H. Performance Guaranteeg 15 I. Conclusion 15 J, Attachmentq 16 Sky Hotel Redevelopment-Planned Development Detailed Review July 14, 2015 A. Purpose of Report This Engineering Report has been prepared in support of a Planned Development Detailed Review Application for the proposed redevelopment of the Sky Hotel located at 709 East Durant Avenue. The information within this report presents our summary of the engineering analysis and findings associated with serving the redevelopment with the required utilities as well as providing stormwater mitigation per the requirements outlined within the City's Urban Runoff Management Plan (URMP) as well as address comments and site revisions that have occurred during the Project Review phase. Detailed civil drawings have been included with ' this report for illustrative support of this document. B. Background The subject property lies within the Lodge Zone District and includes City Lots A, K, L, M, N, O, P and part of lot Q of Block 107 and portions of Lots I and S of City Block 102. The property also includes a portion of vacated South Spring Street right-of-way. The existing building was constructed in 1956 and remodeled in 1980. Currently the Sky Hotel consists of a 3 story building that includes 90 lodge units, lounge, restaurant, retail space and underground parking structure. An existing fifteen (15) foot ingress and egress access easement (Book 202/Page 343) lies along the southern property boundary and benefits the Aspen Alps Condominium Association. There are some parking spaces located within this easement that are utilized by the Aspen Alps Condominium Association. Additionally, an existing (13.83) foot roadway, ingress and egress f granted by Aspen Alps exists along the southern property line for the benefit of the Sky Hotel (Book 327/Page 777). No other easements were identified on the recent ALTA Survey. C. Project Summary The proposed project is currently seeking approval for Planned Development Detailed Review, Growth Management Quota System (GMQS) Exemption, a Growth Management Allocation, Subdivision, Timeshare, Special Review and Conditional Use approvals. The relevant approvals will facilitate the redevelopment of the - property to accommodate the proposed multistory structure comprised of short term lodge, fractional ownership and affordable housing units. Additional improvements include a below grade parking structure, second floor terrace and rooftop deck and entertainment area. This report outlines the utility and stormwater infrastructure required to support the service requirements for these improvements. D. Application Updates The Planned Development Detailed Review application currently submitted has a few differences from the original Project Review application due to minor building modifications and City staff comments. The original developed drainage basin delineation has been updated to reflect building changes such as: ridgeline adjustments, lowering of the east wing, and lower level basement modifications. However, the original drainage mitigation concepts remain the same and the proposed water quality treatment BMPs are consistent with the requirements of the URMP. Additionally, the Site Plan has been updated to relocate the proposed valet drop off parking onsite rather than encroaching into the right of way as originally presented in the Project Review Application. Lastly, the Utility Plan has been updated to provide a plan consistent with the City's requirements of locating service pedestals within the subject property. New service pedestals will be relocated onsite and existing services will be removed from shared pedestals within the Block 107 alley. SOPRIS ENGINEERING ' liC civil consultants 502 Main Street Suite A3 Carbondale Colorado 81623 (970)704-0311 Fax:(970)704-0313 21Page Sky Hotel Redevelopment-Planned Development Detailed Review July 14, 2015 E. Site Utilities Coordination with the various utility providers has taken place to verify layouts, routing and feasibility of serving the proposed improvements. This section describes our findings. Preliminary utility plans have been included within the attached civil drawings for illustrative support. Finalized designs will be submitted when a Building Permit Application is pursued. (a) Water Service & Fire Flow Analysis The City of Aspen Water Department is the provider of potable water for the subject property. Currently the Hotel is served by a ductile iron pipe (DIP) service tap off the existing main that runs down the south side of Durant Avenue. The size of the existing service line will be confirmed prior to Building Permit, though it is our understanding that it is 6" cast iron pipe and not adequately sized to meet the fire flow requirements of current building standards. As such, the line is to be abandoned at the main in accordance with City of Aspen (COA) Water Department standards. A new 8" service tap is currently proposed off the 12" potable water main that runs down the eastern side of South Spring Street and in line with the proposed mechanical room for combined domestic and fire flow. Final ' design of the service line will be coordinated with Water Department staff based on anticipated building program demands and fire sprinkler suppression requirements. ' The historic water consumption of the existing Sky Hotel property has averaged approximately 330,000 gallons per month over the past five years. While the proposed development is increasing the available lodge and adding affordable housing units, new building code requirements will likely result in significant water use reduction on a per unit basis. Therefore, impacts to the City's water and ACSD wastewater facilities are anticipated to be minimal. Final fixture counts and resulting consumptive demands will be determined by the Mechanical Engineer and coordinated with City staff prior to pursuing Building Permit Application. Preliminary estimates from the ME anticipates a 6" water line will to meet the potable water needs of the Hotel, which will be branched off the 8" within the mechanical room. Once inside the building, the 8" water service will be branched off to provide , standby service for an internal fire suppression system. SE anticipates the existing Sky Hotel predates any significant contribution to the COA tap fee program for water service. As such, tap connection fees will likely be required for the proposed redevelopment project. Fire Protection Analysis There is an existing fire hydrant located in the southwest corner of the subject property near the intersection of South Spring Street and Ute Avenue. This hydrant will be relocated slightly to accommodate a proposed landscaping bed and widened sidewalk. Additionally, a secondary existing hydrant is located at the northeast corner of the Durant Avenue and Original Street intersection (approximately 238 feet from the subject property). Based on discussions with Aspen Fire District no additional hydrants or main line extensions are anticipated to serve the proposed development. In addition, Aspen Fire District has suggested that the Fire Department Connection be located along the , north side of the building for accessing from Durant Avenue. SOPRIS ENGINEERING Â· LLC civil consultants 502 Main Street Suite A3 Carbondale Colorado 81623 (970)704-0311 Fax:(970)704-0313 31Page Sky Hotel Redevelopment-Planned Development Detailed Review July 14, 2015 (b) Sanitary Sewer Aspen Consolidated Sanitation District (ACSD) is the supplier of sanitary sewer service to the subject property and surrounding area. There are two existing service connections that are outdated and inconsistent with current District standards. A 4" vitrified clay pipe in Durant Avenue approximately 7 feet west of the existing water service and a 4" cast iron pipe service approximately 150 feet south of the Durant Avenue/ South Spring Street intersection. Both of these existing services will require excavation and abandonment at the main sanitary sewer line in accordance with ACSD requirements. A new service connection compliant to current ACSD regulations is proposed off of Spring Street and in-line with the mechanical room, with 10 feet minimum horizontal separation from the proposed water service. The final size of the service line will be coordinated with ACSD staff and will be based on anticipated daily average and peak flows generated from the proposed improvements, Finalized anticipated flows were not available during preparation of this report, but initial analysis anticipates an 8" service will be required. In addition to the new service line, a new grease trap system will be required to handle waste flows from the proposed kitchen. Basement level fixtures will drain to a subsurface vault and will be pumped to the sanitary sewer service. Vault and pump sizes are to be provided by the Mechanical Engineer. Underground parking and elevator drains will be routed to a sand/oil separator prior to discharge to the sanitary sewer system. This will also require a pumping system prior to discharge to the District's sanitary sewer. Based on discussions with ACSD staff there are no records of the Sky Hotel previously paying tap fees; therefore tap fees will be required as part of the redevelopment and will be due at the time of - Building Permit issuance. (c) Shallow Utilities Shallow utilities serving the existing Sky Hotel property include electric, cable, fiber optic and telephone. The information provided within this section includes utility locates obtained during the 1 J improvement survey as well as discussions with the individual utility providers. Utility easements have been provided on the Final Plat to allow the individual providers access to their respective services and pedestals as necessary. Holy Cross Energy currently serves the subject property via a transformer located adjacent to the Sky ' Hotel and south of Alley Block 107. Redevelopment of the subject property includes removing this existing transformer and installing a new 3-phase transformer along the eastern property line adjacent to Chateau Dumont. Service conduits will be routed in the center of the alley and fed from an existing splice vault located in South Original Street near the intersection of Alley Block 107, within the City's right-of-way. Comcast Cable service is currently provided via a pedestal located at the southwest corner of the Chateau Dumont Lodge. This pedestal also serves the Chateaus Dumont and Chaumont with an amplifier to provide service to the Little Nell. With this project, the Sky Hotel proposes removing cable service from this pedestal and placing a new service pedestal located on site. Secondary service will be extended to the new pedestal from an existing cabinet near the intersection of the Block 107 Alley SOPRIS ENGINEERING Â· LLC civil consultants 502 Main Street Suite A3 Carbondale Colorado 81623 (970)704-0311 Fax:(970)704-0313 41Page Sky Hotel Redevelopment-Planned Development Detailed Review July 14, 2015 and South Original Street. The cable pedestal in front of Chateau Dumont will remain, maintaining service to the existing clients with no service interruption expected. Fiber optic service will also be extended to the new Sky Hotel from the newly constructed pedestal. Century Link Telephone service is currently provided via a pedestal located at the southwest comer of the Chateau Dumont Lodge. Similar to cable service this pedestal also serves the Chateau Dumont and Chateau Chaumont Lodges. Century Link fiber optic service is not currently being provided to the Sky Hotel. However service can be extended from a fiber vault located within Original Street and - would require placement of additional conduit within the electric service trench for possible future use. The existing service pedestal is to remain, and Sky Hotel will relocate its service to a new pedestal onsite adjacent to the proposed transformer. Source Gas currently provides gas service to the Hotel from the gas main that runs along the east side of South Spring Street. The proposed improvements provide a mechanical room at basement level directly adjacent to the existing service connection. As a result, exterior relocation of this gas service and meter is anticipated to be relocated to the south side of the proposed structure. Final routing within the structure will be determined by the mechanical engineer prior to Building Permit Application. f I With the exception of the City Water Department, will serve letters from all utility providers are included as attachments to this report. Further coordination and refining pedestal, transformer and service alignments may occur as the project progresses into final design. A more detailed utility plan will be prepared in support of the Planned Development Detailed Review with a final plan being submitted when a Building Permit Application is pursued. F. Drainage Analysis (a) Introduction The intent of this Section is to provide background drainage information of the subject property, describe the existing onsite and offsite drainage conditions as well as to provide stormwater mitigation solutions, with a strong emphasis on water quality treatment, per the requirements outlined within the City's URMP. Final details, construction documents and drainage report will be submitted with any future Building Permit Application. (b) Background & Overview The subject property falls within System 1 as described within the Surface Drainage Master Plan (SDMP) for the City of Aspen, dated November 2001 prepared by WRC Engineering, Inc. Based on this report this System appears to have capacity to convey a runoff event with a magnitude between a 10-year and 50-year storm event however it also indicates that the combined capacity of the street and storm sewer along Cooper Street and Spring Street appears to have sufficient capacity to convey the 100-year runoff event based on previously adopted NON\ Atlas Il rainfall intensity data. The recently adopted NOAA Atlas 14 Volume 8 rainfall data provides a reduction of rainfall intensities for the City of Aspen of 35% and 28% for the 10-yr and SOPRIS ENSINEERINg e LLC civil consultants 502 Main Street Suite A3 Carbondale Colorado 81623 (970)704-0311 Fax:(970) 704-0313 51Page Sky Hotel Redevelopment-Planned Development Detailed Review July 14, 2015 100-yr 1 hr storm events respectively. Accordingly, excess capacity is available within System 1 of the SDMP compared to original Project Review submittal. The overarching approach of the design team is to provide additional structures that reduce the overall impervious area of the existing site and to incorporate surface water quality treatment of stormwater wherever possible; thereby reducing the development impacts on the City's storm sewer system and enhancing stormwater runoff that ultimately enters the Roaring Fork River. According to FEMA Flood Insurance Rate Map panel number 08097C0204C with effective date of June 4, the property falls entirely within the Zone X flood hazard area, refer to Attachment A. FEMA designates Zone X as areas outside the 0.2% (500 year storm) annual chance floodplain. Referring to Attachment B, it appears that a small portion of the southeast corner of the site falls within the "Blue" mudflow zone and portions of the eastern property falls within the "Yellow" mudflow zone. As detailed within Chapter 7 of the URMP, projects that will modify existing grades or create additional obstructions in a blue mudflow zone will require a 100-year mudflow analysis to demonstrate that the proposed development will manage mudflow impacts to the site and neighboring properties to the maximum extent possible. As required by the URMP a mudflow analysis was performed by Tetra Tech in order to determine any design constraints for the proposed development. The report indicates that the proposed development 'will not cause increases in mud depths at offsite properties" and the development can be "constructed in compliance with the City's mudflow regulations". A copy of this report can be found in Attachment F of this report. (c) Existing Onsite and Offsite Drainage Conditions The subject property encompasses approximately 42,336 square feet which includes approximately 39,100 square feet of impervious area to include patios, decks and asphalt paving. An analysis of the existing conditions survey and information gathered during multiple site investigations produced no evidence of large scale drainage structures for detention or water quality improvements for the majority of the existing property. This produces a 92% impervious site resulting in immediate conveyance of stormwater into the City's right-of- way, without the benefit of water quality treatment or detention of peak flow events. Despite this lack of onsite stormwater infrastructure no evidence of flooding was observed during the several site visits. Primary stormwater runoff from the roof currently flows directly to the City's right of way through numerous identified downspouts. Overall conveyance is towards Durant Avenue via curb/gutter along Spring Street and/or the existing inverted crown within the alley between the Sky Hotel and Chateaus Dumont and Chaumont buildings. Two existing drywells were noted within the property, but neither receives a large contributory area. The first is located within the driveway between the subject property and the Aspen Alps (Building 100). The Sky's contributory flow to this drywell is limited to portions of the roof drainage as well as surface runoff from a few , parking spaces along the southern property line. The second drywell falls within the driveway located between the Sky Hotel and the Chateaus Dumont Lodge. It appears to be receiving surface runoff from the driveway and potentially portions of the Sky Hotel's roof. The drywell within the existing Block 107 alley will need to be SOPRIS ENGINEERING ' liC civil consultants 502 Main Street Suite A3 Carbondale Colorado 81623 (970)704-0311 Fax:(970)704-0313 61Page Sky Hotel Redevelopment-Planned Development Detailed Review July 14, 2015 removed to accommodate the underground parking structure. The drywell between the Sky and Aspen Alps will remain to treat runoff from the Aspen Alps trench drain along the southern property line. Offsite stormwater runoff is generally diverted around the subject property via curb/gutter along Spring Street as well as a narrow trench drain lying between Aspen Alps (Building 100) and the Sky Hotel. Flows intercepted by Spring Street's gutter system are directed to an existing curb inlet located at the southeast corner of Durant Avenue and Spring Street intersection, This inlet is connected to the City's storm sewer system which is identified as System 1 within the previously mentioned City's Surface Drainage Master Plan. The trench drain located between the Sky Hotel and Aspen Alps property is connected to one of the previously mentioned dry wells. These existing systems appear to be adequately mitigating offsite runoff as no evidence of flooding was observed during the several site visits. - (d) Drainage Mitigation Summary Since the entire site is anticipated to be disturbed during the construction of the improvements it will be classified as a "Major Design" (> 1,000 sf of disturbance & disturbance greater than 25% of the total lot area) as described within the City URMP. A project with this type of classification is required to provide water quality treatment and onsite stormwater detention for the entire site. However, detention is not required for this project since it is directly connected to the City's stormwater infrastructure. The drainage design outlined within this report contemplates the incorporation of several stormwater mitigation facilities for treatment of stormwater runoff. Each of these post development drainage strategies are outlined below and are illustrated on Sheet C3. Low Impact Design: Low impact design is a stormwater management strategy that aims to control stormwater at the source by promoting infiltration, evaporation, filtering and detain runoff close to its source. The Low Impact Design techniques that have been incorporated into the conceptual drainage design of this project include green roofs, bioretention cells, Silva cells, permeable pavers and sedimentation/filtration vaults. Each of these techniques will contribute to decreased peak runoff rates and volumes of stormwater exiting the site and entering the City's storm sewer system. Furthermore, these strategies will provide water quality treatment of stormwater which will enhance the quality of rain water exiting the site and entering the City's storm system Develop Basins: Locations of the individual onsite developed basins as well as a brief description of their surface cover are presented below. The developed onsite basins are also visually represented on Sheet C3: Basin 1 encompasses the contributory areas from the proposed valet parking along the west side of the property and a portion of the attached sidewalk fronting South Spring Street. Basin 1 is comprised of impervious materials such as concrete sidewalk and permeable pavers. The permeable pavers proposed within the pickup/drop off aisles (PP-1) provide WQCV treatment for the contributory basin. Basin 2 encompasses the contributory areas from the roof along the western portion of the building as well as a portion of the attached sidewalk along the east side of South Spring Street. Basin 2 is comprised of impervious materials such as concrete sidewalk and traditional roof. Small landscape areas within the basin helps reduce the overall impervious areas. SOPRIS ENGINEERING Â· LLC civil consultants 502 Main Street Suite A3 Carbondale Colorado 81623 (970)704-0311 Fax:(970)704-0313 71Page Sky Hotel Redevelopment-Planned Development Detailed Review July 14, 2015 Gutters and downspouts will be used to ensure runoff flows are routed to the Silva cells (SS-1) beneath the proposed sidewalk and located on the subject property. Basin 3 is a small basin at the entrance to the lower level parking garage. The proposed basin is comprised of permeable pavers (PP-4) which will double as the WQCV treatment strategy for the contributory runoff associated with this basin. Basin 4 consists of roof drainage and exterior landscaping planters at the northwest corner of the site. Runoff will be conveyed to a bio retention cell (BRC-1) contained within the elevated planters for WQCV treatment. Basin 5 consists of roof drainage from the northeast portion of the building as well as the onsite hardscape within the access drive aisle located east of the north wing of the proposed structure. Roof gutters, downspouts and surface sheet flow will convey runoff to a landscape strip along the eastern edge of the property for WQCV treatment (BRC-2) Basin 6 encompasses the tributary area from the northern portion of the roof top terrace drainage. Additionally included are the ground level hardscape and planters along the northern portion of the building fronting the existing alley. Roof gutters, downspouts, and drain pipes will convey runoff to a subsurface sedimentation/filtration vault within the alley (SFV-1) Basin 7 encompasses the tributary area from a portion of the roof top terrace drainage. It consists primarily of flat and pitched traditional roofs as well as elevated planters, a pool and a spa. Roof gutters and downspouts will convey runoff to an elevated roof top planter within the east wing roof terrace (BRC-3) for WQCV treatment, , Basin 8 encompasses the tributary area from the pitched and flat roofs associated with the East Wing terrace of the proposed building. It consists primarily of flat and pitched traditional roofs as well as elevated planters and a spa. Roof gutters and downspouts will convey runoff to a ground level landscape bed (BRC-7) along the eastern edge of the property for WQCV treatment. This landscape area will likely be tiered to accommodate the grade differential from north to south. Basin 9A encompasses the tributary roof drainage from the northeast portion of the roof top patio. The basin consists of elevated planters, green roofs, flat traditional roofs as well as a pool/spa area. Roof gutters, downspouts and surface drains will convey runoff to a subgrade sedimentation/filtration vault (SFV-2) located in the landscaping area adjacent to the Aspen Alps parking for WQCV treatment. Basin 9B encompasses the tributary roof drainage from the central portion of the roof top patio. The basin consists of elevated planters, flat traditional roof as well as a spa area. Roof gutters, downspouts and surface drains flow will convey runoff to a subgrade sedimentation/filtration vault (SFV-3) located in the landscaping area adjacent to the Aspen Alps parking for WQCV treatment. SOPRIS ENUINEERING Â· LLC civil consultants 502 Main Street Suite A3 Carbondale Colorado 81623 (970)704-0311 Fax:(970)704-0313 81Page Sky Hotel Redevelopment-Planned Development Detailed Review July 14, 2015 Basin 10 encompasses the tributary drainage from the second level terrace on the south side of the site, as well as a portion of the entrance canopy roof drainage. The basin consists of L.k elevated planters, flat and pitched traditional roof as well as a spa area. Terrace drains, gutters and downspouts will convey runoff to a bioretention cell (BRC-4) located in the landscaping area on the south side of the site fronting the South Spring Street "cul-de-sac" for WQCV treatment. Basin 11 encompasses the tributary drainage from the diagonal parking within the Aspen Alps alley between the proposed structure and the existing trench drain. The basin consists of asphalt paving and vegetated landscaping on the west end of the basin. Sheet and concentrated gutter flow will convey runoff through a curb cut to an at grade bioretention cell (BRC-5) located in the landscaping area adjacent to the west end of the Aspen Alps parking for WQCV treatment. A potential parking configuration currently under negotiations between the Sky Hotel and Aspen Alps 100 Building as depicted on Sheet PD1.1B of the architectural plans and Plan Option B of the landscaping plans respectively may be pursued as alternative to what is illustrated on the attached civil drawings. This revised parking scheme realigns the asphalt cover within the basin, however the overall perviousness of the basin has been increased through expanded landscape areas compared to existing conditions. As a result, SE feels there is ample room to provide a water quality treatment BMP consistent with the requirements of the URMP if this option is pursued. Basin 12 encompasses the tributary drainage from a small bulbout within the sidewalk near the entrance to the lower level parking garage. The basin consists of impervious concrete sidewalk. Given the location of the basin, site constraints and proper positive drainage will result in the project to request a variance from the WQCV treatment requirement for this basin. Further explanation of the variance request can be found in the next section of the report. Basin 13 encompasses the tributary drainage from a small area a north end of the project, beneath the proposed bicycle parking. The basin consists of permeable paving drive surface that additionally serve as the WQCV treatment strategy (PP-2) for this basin. Basin 14 encompasses the tributary drainage from a small area just east of the proposed second level terrace. The basin consists of elevated landscaping planters as well as permeable pavers. The permeable pavers proposed within the basin will provide the required WQCV treatment (PP-3) Basin 15 encompasses the tributary drainage from a portion of the pitched roof drainage on the south side of the structure, fronting the Aspen Alps alley. The basin consists of traditional pitched roofs and vegetated landscaping on the southwest portion of the basin. Roof gutters and downspouts will convey surface drainage to a bioretention cell (BRC-6) located in the landscaping area near the west end of the Aspen Alps parking for WQCV treatment. A potential parking configuration currently under negotiations between the Sky Hotel and Aspen Alps 100 Building as depicted on Sheet PD1.1B of the architectural plans and Plan Option B of the landscaping plans may be pursued as an alternative to what is illustrated on the SOPRIS ENEINEERING ' lLC civil consultants 502 Main Street Suite A3 Carbondale Colorado 81623 (970)704-0311 Fax:(970)704-0313 91Page Sky Hotel Redevelopment-Planned Development Detailed Review July 14, 2015 attached civil drawings. This revised parking scheme realigns the asphalt cover within the basin, however the overall imperviousness of the basin has been increased through expanded landscape areas compared to existing conditions. As a result, SE feels there is ample room to provide a water quality treatment BMP consistent with the requirements of the URMP. Water Quality Treatment: Water quality treatment is required for all projects that disturb more than 200 square feet. The overall goal of the water quality treatment requirements is to protect receiving waters including the Roaring Fork River, Maroon Creek, Castle Creek and tributaries to these water ways. The treatment is provided by strategically incorporating stormwater Best Management Practices into the project's stormwater infrastructure that are capable of providing full water quality treatment for up to the 80th percentile runoff event which corresponds to the volume of runoff generated from a storm event with a magnitude falling between a 6-month and 1-year. The water quality capture volume associated with these more common storm events is directly correlated to the amount of impervious area within a contributing drainage basin. The conceptual integration of the proposed water quality treatment BMPs are discussed below and illustrated on the attached plans. Bio-retention Cells are depressed landscaping areas designed to capture and filter or infiltrate the water quality capture volume from a contributing drainage basin. The conceptual water quality drainage basins for the proposed improvements have been laid out based on the current building design to determine if proposed receiving landscaping areas/bio-retention cells are adequate in providing the required treatment volume. Since the majority of these treatment areas will fall above and/or adjacent to structures they will require an impermeable liner and underdrain system. The underdrain systems will be connected to the City's storm sewer system via existing or proposed inlet structures. In addition, overflow inlets will likely be provided within each of the proposed bio-retention cells to provide conveyance of storm events that exceed the provided water quality treatment volumes. Bioretention is the proposed water quality treatment BMP for Basins 4,5,7,8, 10, 11 and 15. Please see Table 1 for anticipated WQCVs for the respective BRCs. â€¢ BRC-1: is located within the proposed raised planting area along the west and northwest portion of the proposed structure. This area will receive runoff from Basin 4 and will be sized to accommodate the resultant water quality capture volume. Gutters and downspouts will be used to ensure runoff flows are routed to this bio-retention planter area. Overflow drains will be installed to convey larger storm events directly to the City's stormwater system within Durant Avenue. â€¢ BRC-2: is proposed along the east side of the previously vacated Spring Street right- of-way. This treatment area will receive runoff from Basin 5 and will be sized to provide the water quality capture volume. Overflow drains will be installed to convey larger storm events to the City's stormwater system via a newly constructed storm sewer along the eastern edge of the property. â€¢ BRC-3: is contained within an elevated planter at rooftop level near the eastern portion of the proposed structure. This treatment area will receive runoff from the adjacent Basin 7 and will accommodate the water quality capture volume required. SOPRIS ENGINEERING ' lLC civil consultants 502 Main Street Suite A3 Carbondale Colorado 81623 (970)704-0311 Fax:(970)704-0313 10IPage Sky Hotel Redevelopment-Planned Development Detailed Review July 14, 2015 Overflow inlets will connect to the building's roof drain system and convey larger storm events directly to the City's stormwater collections system. â€¢ BRC-4: is contained within an elevated planter on the south side of the site adjacent to the second floor terrace. This treatment area will receive runoff from the adjacent Basin 10 and will accommodate the water quality capture volume required. Overflow drains will convey larger storm events to a newly constructed storm inlet within the S. Spring Street curb and gutter. â€¢ BRC-5: is an at grade rain garden contained within the proposed landscape area directly adjacent to the existing Aspen Alps diagonal parking. A curb cut will be installed within the proposed curb and gutter to convey runoff from Basin 11. The proposed BRC will be sized to accommodate the anticipated water quality capture volume and will provide an additional 3" of freeboard. Overflow drains will be installed to convey larger storm events to the City's storm sewer system through an onsite storm collection pipe along the Aspen Alps alley. Final alignment and depth of the proposed BRC may change slightly based on the proposed parking realignment depicted on Sheet PD1.1B of the architectural plans and Plan Option B of the landscaping plans. However a cursory review of the proposed parking changes observed ample room onsite to provide WQ treatment through a BRC. â€¢ BRC-6: is an at grade rain garden contained within the proposed landscape area near the existing Aspen Alps diagonal parking. Roof gutters and downspouts will be utilized to convey drainage from Basin 15 above to the proposed BRC. The BRC will be sized to accommodate the anticipated water quality capture volume and will provide an additional 3" of freeboard. Overflow drains will be installed to convey larger storm events to the City's storm sewer system through an onsite storm collection pipe along the Aspen Alps alley. Final alignment and depth of the proposed BRC may change slightly based on the proposed parking realignment depicted on Sheet PD1.1B of the architectural plans and Plan Option B of the landscaping plans. However a cursory review of the proposed parking changes observed ample room onsite to provide WQ treatment through a BRC. â€¢ BRC-7: is a landscape area in the alley, separating the east side of the building and the Glory Hole condominiums. Due to location and site topography, this BRC will likely be tiered and may not support plant growth. Xeriscaping may be utilized in this areas and will be finalized prior to Building Permit. The BRC will be sized to accommodate the water quality capture volume with overflow drains connected to the ' City's Stormwater system in the Block 107 alley. Subsurface Sedimentation/Filtration Vaults and/or alternative underground treatment facilities are required given the challenges associated with routing some of the proposed below grade spaces and roof areas to an at grade bio-retention landscape area. Preliminary design of the proposed sedimentation/filtration vaults indicate gravity discharge to the City's stormwater system is feasible from the proposed locations. Should design constraints change prior to Sâ€¢Pills ENBINEERING Â· LLC civil consultants 502 Main Street Suite A3 Carbondale Colorado 81623 (970)704-0311 Fax:(970)704-0313 11IPage Sky Hotel Redevelopment-Planned Development Detailed Review July 14, 2015 Building Permit, a pumped system may be required given the limited space available for potential relocations. The locations and a conceptual schematic detail of this proposed subsurface sedimentation treatment vault has been provided on the attached drawings and tables below. Subsurface sedimentation/filtration vaults are the proposed water quality treatment BMP for Basins 6,9A and 9B. Please see Table 1 for anticipated WQCVs for the respective SFVs. â€¢ SFV-1 is proposed within the previously vacated Spring Street ROW and will sit directly on top of the basement roof structure below. Roof gutters and downspouts will be utilized to convey runoff from Basin 6 above. Treated runoff will be conveyed to the City's stormwater system through an onsite storm sewer along the eastern property line constructed as part of this project. The proposed vault is sized to accommodate the anticipated water quality capture volume and will comply with the requirements of Section 8.5.4.1 of the URMP. â€¢ SFV-2 is proposed within the proposed landscaping area adjacent to the Aspen Alps diagonal parking and will sit directly on the basement roof structure below. Roof drains, gutters and downspouts will be utilized to convey runoff from rooftop Basin 9A and will be sized to accommodate the anticipated water quality capture volume required. Treated runoff will be conveyed to the City's stormwater system through an onsite storm sewer along the southern property line constructed as part of this project. The will comply with the requirements of Section 8.5.4.1 of the URMP. â€¢ SFV-3 is proposed within the proposed landscaping area adjacent to the Aspen Alps diagonal parking and will sit directly on the basement roof structure below. Roof drains, gutters and downspouts will be utilized to convey runoff from rooftop Basin 9B and will be sized to accommodate the anticipated water quality capture volume required. Treated runoff will be conveyed to the City's stormwater system through an onsite storm sewer along the southern property line constructed as part of this project. The will comply with the requirements of Section 8.5.4.1 of the URMP Permeable Pavers are proposed for a portion of this project where surface runoff cannot be otherwise treated through alternative LID treatment train options prior to discharge to the City's stormwater system. This type of BMP is comprised of a layer of concrete pavers separated by joints filled with small stones. Water enters the joints between solid concrete pavers and flows through an open graded base; i.e. crushed stone layers with no small or fine particles. The void spaces among the crushed stones store water and infiltrate it back into the soil subgrade or to an underdrain as proposed with this project. The conceptual design of the permeable pavers was based on the design criteria as outlined within Section 8.5.1.4 of the City's URMP. Effective impervious areas were based on the assumption that underdrains will be required given the close proximity to proposed structures. Underdrains are anticipated to be routed to the Silva cells near the northwest portion of the site or directly to the City's stormwater collection system. Final locations and design of the permeable pavers will be provided prior to building permit application. The installation of all permeable pavers shall SOPRIS ENSINEERING Â· LLC civil consultants 502 Main Street Suite A3 Carbondale Colorado 81623 (970)704-0311 Fax:(970)704-0313 12IPage Sky Hotel Redevelopment-Planned Development Detailed Review July 14, 2015 comply with the specifications provided by Interlocking Concrete Pavement Institute (ICPI). Permeable pavers are the proposed water quality treatment BMP for Basins 1, 3,13 and 14. â€¢ PP-1: permeable pavers are proposed to provide the anticipated 12 CF of water quality capture volume for Basin 1. The pavers are proposed to be installed within the off street parking area for valet drop-off. An underdrain will be installed to convey filtered runoff to the City's stormwater collection system within South Spring Street. â€¢ PP-2: permeable pavers are proposed to provide the anticipated 0.4 CF of water quality capture volume for Basin 13. The pavers are proposed to be installed beneath the bicycle parking on the north side of the structure adjacent to the Durant Avenue attached parking. An underdrain will be installed to convey filtered runoff to the City's stormwater collection system within Durant Avenue. â€¢ PP-3: permeable pavers are proposed to provide the 3 CF of water quality capture volume generated within Basin 14. The pavers will be installed beneath stair landing to the second level terrace as well as the proposed bicycle parking on the south side of the site. An underdrain will be installed to convey filtered runoff to the City's storm sewer system through an onsite storm collection pipe along the Aspen Alps alley. â€¢ PP-4: permeable pavers are proposed to provide the 2 CF of water quality capture volume generated within Basin 3. The pavers will be installed at the entrance to the below grade parking garage. An underdrain system will be included and will route flows to the adjacent Silva cells. Silva Cells are a modular block system used to support sidewalks. The blocks are filled with a high-quality, uncompacted soil media that supports tree growth. This type of system also provides an opportunity to treat stormwater runoff through a process of absorption, evapotranspiration and stormwater detention. This project has integrated this system into the stormwater mitigation design by routing stormwater runoff through the array of Silva Cells proposed along the southern edge of the plaza thereby providing water quality treatment for a small sliver of onsite impervious area as well as the majority of the southern walk along the north side of Durant and within the City's ROW. Silva cells are the proposed water quality treatment BMP for Basin 2. â€¢ SS-1: is a group of Silva cells constructed onsite beneath the attached sidewalk along the east side of South Spring Street. These cells will be designed to accommodate the approximately 48 CF of water quality capture volume for Basin 2. SOPRIS ENGINEERING Â· LLC civil consultants 502 Main Street Suite A3 Carbondale Colorado 81623 (970)7040311 Fax:(970)704-0313 13IPage Sky Hotel Redevelopment-Planned Development Detailed Review July 14, 2015 Table 1: Conceptual Water Quality Treatment Summary WQ CONTRIBUMNG AREA % WQCV REQ. WQCV PROPOSED I.D. BASIN S.F. IMPERV DEPTH (in) (cf) TREATMENT LOCATION LANDSCAPING ALONGNORTH SIDEOF BRC-1 4 1491 64% 0.125 16 BUILDING BRC-2 5 4464 84% 0.185 69 L.ANDSCAPING ALONG EAST SIDE OF SITE BRC-3 7 1492 82% 0.180 22 ROOF TOP PLANTER BRC-4 10 3362 89% 0.205 57 LANDSCAPING AREA SOUTH OF PATIO BRC-5 11 3149 85% 0.190 50 LANDSCAPING AREA WEST OF ALPS PARKING BRC-6 15 2092 78% 0.160 28 LANDSCAPING AREA WEST OF ALPS PARKING BRC-7 8 8588 88% 0.200 143 LANDSCAPINGAREA EASTOF BUILDING WQ CONTRIBUTING AREA % WQCV REQ. WQCV PROPOSED I.D. BASI N S.F. IMPERV DEPTH (in) (cf) TREATMENT LOCATION BELOW GRADE IN ALLEY ALONG EAST SIDE OF SFV-1 6 5205 74% 0.15 65 BUILDING SFV-2 9A 3774 90% 0.21 66 LANDSCAPING AREA WEST OF ALPS PARKING SFV-3 9B 4298 84% 0.185 66 LANDSCAPING AREA WEST OF ALPS PARKING WQ CONTRIBUTING AREA % WQCV WQCV PROPOSED I.D. BASINS S.F. IMPERV DEPTH (in) (cf) TREATMENT LOCATION SS-1 2 2288 97% 0.250 48 WITHIN SILVA CELL GROW MEDIA Water Quality Variance Request is proposed for the small Basin-12 as previously mentioned above. The primary challenge associated with providing water quality treatment for this basin has to do with the sidewalk grades required to provide positive drainage and the basin's proximity to the right of way. Basin 12 is approximately 146 square feet and produces approximately 0.011 and 0.20 CFS to the City's ROW. Given the development's overall increased pervious areas compared to the existing site and the minimal direct runoff, SE believes a variance from the required 3 CF of WQCV treatment is justified. - Offsite Drainage Improvements: Various offsite drainage improvements are proposed to facilitate the proposed improvements. For example, the proposed bulb-out and improvements located along the south side of Durant Avenue will create several low points that will require inlets and curb chases to capture and route collected flows to the City's storm system. A bulbout at Durant Avenue will require removal of an existing inlet. New inlets are proposed as replacements. One inlet is proposed in the flowline of S. Spring Street to intercept flows before the intersection of Durant Avenue. Two additional inlets are proposed on the south side of Durant Avenue within the diagonal parking to replace the existing curb inlets removed with the bulbout construction. Similarly, a trench drain is proposed along the west end of Alley Block 107 to reduce offsite flows from entering Basin-5's treatment area located along the eastern property line. Offsite drainage infrastructure is illustrated on the attached drawings, The locations, sizes and design of these offsite drainage improvements will be finalized prior to pursuing a Building Permit Application. G. Existing and Proposed Access The existing parking structure entrance lies on the east side of the building and is accessed from Durant Avenue. Departing traffic is routed to Original Street via the one-way Alley Block 107. The main entrance to SOPRIS ENGINEERING ' ILLC civil consultants 502 Main Street Suite A3 Carbondale Colorado 81623 (970)704-0311 Fax:(970)704-0313 141Page Sky Hotel Redevelopment-Planned Development Detailed Review July 14, 2015 the Sky Hotel; however is located off Spring Street. This requires valet service to drop lodging residence off along Spring Street, turn around at the dead-end and then travel north along Spring Street, turn right onto Durant and then turn right to access the parking structure. This creates additional traffic as well as several unnecessary turning movements. The improvements associated with the redevelopment of the Sky Hotel includes a drop off area along the west side of Spring Street which will provide direct access to the proposed parking structure entrance; thereby eliminating the need for additional turning movements within Spring Street's dead-end. This will require an off street parking pullout in the opposite direction of traffic flow located within the subject property. This circulation concept has been presented and approved with City Engineering Staff. Delivery vehicles will maintain historic circulation patterns, via an access to the site from Durant Avenue and continue through the existing one way alley to South Original Street. Fire protection turning movements can be accommodated through the Block 107 alley as well as the South Spring Street 'cul-de-sac". H. Performance Guarantees Per Section 26.490.070 of the Land Use code performance guarantees have been prepared for this project. A copy of the Public Facilities and Public Infrastructure Guarantee, the Storm Water and Drainage Improvement Guarantee and associated exhibits can be found in Appendix D of this report. The Public Facilities and Public Infrastructure Guarantee provides bonding to assure all utility and infrastructure improvements associated with the project that benefit the public will be constructed should the development halt after construction has commenced. Similarly the Stormwater and Drainage Improvement Guarantee provides bonding for all onsite and offsite stormwater improvements should the development halt after construction has commenced. A 15% contingency has been added to each to accommodate market fluctuations, inflation and the conceptual level of design. Appendix D includes plans and cost estimates in support of these performance guarantees. 1. Conclusion The improvements proposed under the Sky Hotel Redevelopment Planned Development Detailed Review are consistent with current underlying zoning and provide improvements to the amenities currently available at the subject property. Utility routing required to serve the redevelopment have been coordinated and schematically presented on the attached civil documents. Any and all required easements will be provided to the appropriate utility providers at the time of final plat. In regards to stormwater mitigation, the reduction in overall impervious areas and incorporating water quality treatment volumes throughout the property will reduce impacts on the City's stormwater system meeting the intent of the City's URMP. The redevelopment will also improve traffic flow along Spring Street, Durant Avenue and Alley Block 107 by locating the underground parking entrance to the southern end of Spring Street; thereby eliminating unnecessary travel distances and redundant travel paths along Spring Street and Durant Avenue. Lastly, additional drainage, grading and site utility information has been provided in support of the Planned Development Detailed Review submittal. Per recent discussions with City Engineering Staff, final site grading, utility routing and proposed stormwater infrastructure will be i provided during Building Permit Application. SOPRIS ENGINEERING Â·LLC civil consultants 502 Main Street Suite A3 Carbondale Colorado 81623 (970)704-0311 Fax:(970)704-0313 15IPage Sky Hotel Redevelopment-Planned Development Detailed Review July 14, 2015 J. Attachments A. Flood Insurance Rate Map 08097C0204 C B. City of Aspen Mudflow Zone Map C. Will Serve Letters D. Planned Development Detailed Review Civil Drawings E "Sky Hote/ Mudflow Analysis", Tetra Tech; June 25,2015 F. Urban Drainage Runoff Spreadsheets G. Performance Guarantees SOPRIS ENGINEERING Â· LLC civil consultants 502 Main Street Suite A3 Carbondale Colorado 81623 (970)704-0311 Fax:(970)704-0313 161Page ATTACHMENT A FLOOD RATE INSURANCE MAP 0 ZONE X Â» - 3-Â»so 1 q APPROXIMA-rE SCALE IN FEET ~ L~~00tbridge 500 0 500 Â«71 9.2-Â«11\\ +-1 E---1 1-1 7856 '6: I ~~ 7954 7861 - 2+:hil h.' ' Â« ..4-* I.. 7866 ~ ZONE A[ 1 t. I ,., -Â·-. Â·'., . G~Â§~Â·:,? Â·Â·.'~ \ 99â‚¬ \, 1 , ROARING ~RK RIVER-4 \ NATIONAL FLOOD INSURANCE PROGRAM i EH Â» 94 /0,>5> A; N R 1\4~~~~~35.--- -Ctti~--3 1 iFoorbridge ' ~ 9--U:% 9,22-f >-2*GO / 4 " CITY OF ASPEN--i ZON E X /f J \ FIRM /X 90\ . Â»2Â« -1 L 080143 ~~*-bZ. 4 y Foorbridge *~ 4 #/4 FLOOD INSURANCE RATE MAP 9\-I 7898 -Â«*-1.~f~79,05 ~4 PITKIN COUNTY, e ZOE K \C ~/ /ZONE X ~/ ~7885 7 < COLORADO AND IrÂ»-j L EJ 1 -- "I'Â·9'. y /h /1------- -23- INCORPORATED AREAS le :, 0 04 --- /O 12 Â· 0 . , ...7 7913 \ -2-222--i'' ~ ~ 7892 '06 1 4 - ~141.-r PANEL 204 OF 325 3/ tru l 7894 .1: 4~---A-k*~*-- Footbridge '<79171 UR~Â©-1 141 k -It~n--4 - -;133,/~~(7921 \~ b fispjr e . ir, --1/7 t-aget/Nt:11 CONTAINS: ~Â»1944 j 3 f-21--HE R 15L -NUMBER_- E!125 SUFFIX COMMUNITY COMAi UNITY PANEL i Â· ~ 7926 4 1411 1 161 2 3044Â»\- ASPEN. CITY OF. ..080143 ..0204...i..C ~~ ~ PITIOId COUNTY. , - --- 61 '9 CAECE-9 i MNCIAPORATEOAREAS. ..080287. .0204 . ..C U f . 14Â·n ----ely: 6 -.9- 7936 1'.,1. f -7931 a .~ ~j~ --- EQUA. I 2-- 1 â‚¬10 /- f -N \) 1-1 1 .+ 2 000000000&0 r\\ L. -A ve A - 1 l-02.'1uE\7938 <., 1 4 AX \0 + 08097C0204 C - . 1 le' . 0 Z EFFECTIVE DATE: 10~ -21-- ER ' ;. ZONE AE ,*281/ JUNE 4,1987 ~--7946 1\ c I Il M:..' A . '.4. 1\ 7951 a . AL \ xcz:sy Attachment A ' ~~ Federal Emergency Management Agency 913/ \\6 1 \\ \ A * 4 X~\V ,~' ZONE X ~ CITY OF ASPEN ES 46//\ This is an official cApy of a portion of the above referenced nood map. It 1 1- 7 080143 / was extracted using F-MIT On-Line. This map does not reflect changes 7956 3 ~ or amendments which may have been made subsequent to the date on the / ~~ title block. For the latest product information about National Flood Insurance # LRIVERSI~~~ 1 - 1 ( L , Program lood maps checkthe FEMA Flood Map Store at www. msc.ferne. gov JOINSPANEL 0203 ATTACHMENT B CITY MUDFLOWZONE MAP 8 LNEPIHOVL.V (iÂ¥.I-/0~030noa~) 0,0. 'oN eor Â·UuE =4Mlt I1333 Ni) P Pocrgo 314)93!Hang Alladold -1.33[8nS 30 dn-AA019 3NOZ MoldonIN \ \\ \ \ i % *C##-FE LL_ -i| =ELLJ 1.1-- 13 2 .......8 501.... .t 4 1 1 ''B e. ,Â». 2,~z ~01,[ 0.1,Â·, 3!,lu alÂ¥,1~ro~4. RÂ·*6Â»xI - ON353=T 771 -11 -1- / 1- \91 4 /1- -1 ~ ~-7 1 j[Â», 44494\ linnal '] 60' \- 1N3 WdO13A3O3U 0350dOHd 13[OHIS 1 1 24 -X\\ ",ni,17:6:Â°' 1 ~jj~ LE~~~2~~2426*~t_~123=Â£23rll=~~~~ 1-11 1 74 1 6 n ---- --L_ ---2 -'--31: h==2==*UD-11 6 -1 1 , -- I# ,1 --Rim UL ----------------------1- . -1 1 1 0-11 f-h 04! N*-8 f 1 1., C ..uoz-UPâ€¢.1.Da.,0410"l.-61~ =IF E 1 li i 6 44 1 11 . 01, 1,1, 41 1 1 I 3Â¥Â§ 8 rn Mi 14 , 11 9 1-1~. 1 4 7 I 1 ; 1 /1- If It 1/+76 4 - - IC! 1 36 \ , 1 1~, ~ 7 13 1 "IP<i 4 i *ff 4_.*15 ' - 121-=El ' 1']r~ ~ '92,4 942 Z -,1 1 -- 41,9,41 1,Ali'Mft:i 111 ,Â·rk'L ... ....1-1-4 111 1 P-lt . - ,-3421=U=2.~1''3 ~ 19- - ,12' N ,;~ = --- A-Â·-Â· 1- i-,Ir,unir-i =r- - , 4â€¢, Â·Â·r ..,1, 1 H 11 1-il \ \ \ Â»P L . Af Apljo, Â·943â‚¬E#42 4124**BOQ- 3fl/3AVLNnl/0 1, 100-Mali=. -1-Â· Z $Â» r--r--1 O 1-- V -Â¥-,J U- - U I &-=2 Ca-Â·24ee; .,Â·. & -12 -- - L:-. ~jAM-W-r =,99 h --0--4,741 -.ate y 0 A93':TAW; 9~Â·*.*14#4~y/j<. .1 -Pl 1'--:1411.-i--il== -4,12; 4-,1.3.FY- I.~af-~44 YJ~-A-F/-~4 -4--L. Z 1 4'1N -4430, 8 -d ,; li 01 Ag N~,WN' S3NOZ MO-13 GAIN NIV1NAOIN N3dSV 8 IN31"IHOÂ¥.LLV Ae e.91530 ~ Sl 00Â¥80100 'NBdSV 30 Allo . INBINdo-13/\3(138 13.LOH A>IS . 3.?ili i.:L i i p THE #ENELLHOTEL S18,0 5 (DZE) m UTH SPRING ST. ORHISNOO . ca,0360 ~100[100[10[4 AhIVNIV,11 3Hd ATTACHMENT C WILL SERVE LETTERS @omcast June 2, 2014 John Sarpa c/o Rowland and Broughton 234 E Hopkins Ave Aspen, Colorado 81611 RE: Sky Hotel Aspen, Colorado Please accept this letter as confirmation that Comcast of Colorado has the ability to provide cable service to the captioned location. The provision of service is contingent upon successful negotiations of an Agreement between the developer and Comcast Cable Communications, Inc. Should you require additional information, please contact Michael Johnson. I can be reached at (970) 930-4713. Sincerely, Michael Johnson Construction/Engineering Comcast Cable Communications This letter is not intended to give rise to binding obligations for either party. Any contractual relationship between the parties will be the result of formal negotiations and will only become effective upon execution of the contract by representatives of the parties authorized to enter into such agreements. During any negotiations, each party will bear its own costs and will not be responsible for any costs or expenses of the other party, unless separately agreed to in writing 3799 HIGHWAY 82 Â· P. O. BOX 2150 GLENWOOD SPRINGS, COLORADO 81602 (970) 945-5491 Â· FAX (970) 945-4081 June 2, 2014 Mr. John Sarpa c/o Rowland and Broughton 234 E. Hopkins Avenue Aspen, CO 81611 RE: Sky Hotel Redevelopment @ 709 East Durant Avenue Dear Mr. Sarpa: The above mentioned development is within the certificated service area of Holy Cross Energy. Holy Cross Energy has existing power facilities located on or near the above mentioned project. These existing facilities have adequate capacity to provide electric power to the development, subject to the tariffs, rules and regulations on file. Any power line enlargements, relocations, and new extensions necessary to deliver adequate power to and within the development will be undertaken by Holy Cross Energy upon completion of appropriate contractual agreements and subject to necessary governmental approvals. Please advise when you wish to proceed with the development of the electric system for this project. Sincerely, /.<- HOLY CROSS ENERGY - Â«44] 0 Vv Jeffrey A. Franke, Engineering Department ifranke@holvcross.com (970) 947-5416 JAF:vw Franke\Sarpa A Touchstone Energy Cooperative 42 1 ;Ctfh = 6 *"t~01â‚¬3 Gas June 3, 2014 From: Todd Ellsworth SourceGas 0096 County Rd. 160 Glenwood Springs, CO 81601 970-928-0407 To: John Sarpa do Rowland and Broughton 234 E. Hopkins Avenue Aspen CO 81611 RE: Sky Hotel Redevelopment Aspen, CO Dear John: The above mentioned development is within the certificated service area of SourceGas. SourceGas has existing natural gas facilities located on or near the above mentioned project At this time it appears that these existing facilities have adequate capacity to provide natural gas service to your project, subject to the tariffs, rules and regulations on file. Any upgrading of our facilities necessary to deliver adequate service to and within the development will be undertaken by SourceGas upon completion of appropriate contractual agreements and subject to necessary governmental approvals. Please contact us with any questions regarding this project, and with a timeline of when you would like to proceed with your project. Sincerely, aut& 'Em" * + 1 11 Todd Ellsworth < Field Coordinator .? 1 2/7 - 04 Centurylink- Stronger Connectedâ„¢ 06/02/2014 Attn: John Sarpa Rowland and Broughton 234 E. Hopkins Ave Aspen, CO. 81611 Re: Sky Hotel Redevelopment Qwest Corporation d/b/a CenturyLink QC will provide telephone facilities to Sky Hotel Redevelopment as defined by the current PUC Tariffs. Jason Sharpe Engineer 11 (Field Operations) 970-328-8290 Aspen Consolidated Sanitation District Michael Kelly â€¢ Chair Stoney Davis John Keleher â€¢ Vice Chair Joe Zanin Roy Holloway â€¢ Sec/Treas Bruce Matherly â€¢ Mgr June 11, 2014 John Sarpa c/ o Rowland and Broughton 234 E. Hopkins Avenue Aspen CO 81611 RE: Sky Hotel Redevelopment John, The Aspen Consolidated Sanitation District currently has sufficient wastewater collection and treatment capacity to serve this project. Service is contingent upon compliance with the district's rules, regulations, and specifications, which are on file at the District office. There are downstream constraints in the Districts Outfall line that will be corrected through a system of proportionate impact fees. Once detailed plans are made available to the district, we will be able to comment specifically about this proposed project. Sactrey, / f~ Thomas R. Bracewell Collection Systems Superintendent CC Bruce Matherly, ACSD District Manager 565 N. Mill St..Aspen. CO 81611 /(970)925-3601 /FAX (970)925-2537 ATTACHMENT D CIVIL PLANNED DEVELOPMENT DETAILED REVIEW DRAWINGS 12 1/~63:'16 - , ker.2 , 4 8Â«60 ~ 1 SITE IMPROVEMENTS LEGEND 8 1 1 1 c5 /:=S=%:22 < J . Â°el 71'Â· Twt. I r 6~,op,Â¤.=E h /9 , - - 0227-~~- -,0 - '111.0.011"BOF[1~1'imi Z W-# } .N. %': i 1 + - -/ 6, -9 7/ =5: -7.-- C.A.ek...=,Ef:.AÂ·Â·:'1 'â€¢opâ„¢D -Le'A- I ". LeI\= --' â€¢RO#0$ ./ ADARAI.F /3 3 1 *Jit , 1 j I - -4#<3-- -- - 6 \ # \ i j ......MEA.I. /<t./ 1/ - --27Â«ki-N 1 l i t.. -6 =EF ..W /7 1 . -%- - -4~.kup- ACCE5S; 9.u U 1,Â·==1 f j 1\~ 4 t.i - 02*UN 1 0 i mu --6 E8%2 -W CHATEAU CHA1EAUCHAUM0IT .,1 1 r l i â€ž 9, Â·t f==- *#* _ IN a:; ~ DRAI' PAN " a.. C ; r Z L-* 4 4* == ,/wuu.,.a j ). f-* a 41# 4 .# . ~1 1 1 - '. lili [S-Â·1 1>:-- 1 -- 1 1 % LL 4 6 i i <Â· b' f.ff Â·, Â· /==f .... <W 1/1.1 //.:, . 1 / /4- 1< a r: '. 0...4 SKY HOTEL 709 E DURANTAVE 42 336/ *- --- 1.e 6,1~O00~Cowlua,iD I 7 -- ./.MT.A....Ut.I 2 4.- 1=24. 7 1#MAN&*=* ~,PRO~),EN14 #... w,Yll,1 gTA.a . ~ S'KIG,m,$ - I .... 4 - ....... GlORy H , 42\ i ux,Ti,ual-noi. pao,o!,Dal~ CONDOMINIUMS ~ ./r \-- ~1 i '2411 8= l~. - 1 .%A.,- 9 x,7 ~, rfi Â·Â· ~ R ... , *- 6==0 " 1 1 r . .. 1 \ 1 0. 74 k ......... / - EW.E.,0/11-OW 1 i 4 2 -m-/ io,Ar.mnil.~-*LD I ' ./- ..2. *.3 1, //14:0-- - 24-9,14.k 1 / f-- \ , MERI 411-C' E...1...Fo~ .mi, 11 0*-UA,EW,fr - Â» /\ INATE'AD....mO~ AO~Wl=t= 1-7- Â£ i t i~ ' GiUPHICSCALE a",mâ€ž7 1~_311.m r<'S. f 1 AS. Al,PS BUiLDiNG 100 (IN'EETJ ASPENA.5 (looBLA REOUCE"CHS.'.fAL -- -- -7 / PLATBK...04Â·308 , ? Th ' r.- i 1 S 12=. E Â·14-16 14040 C1 NOUÂ°71SN03 ..... iljo .1/10~ 711 'DNIN33NIDN 3 flkldÂ° S 18O~elsgo 1 9.LNÂ¥11(SNO]lIAID | 3n,3/AÂ¥ 1NVAIAO -360 1N3rld013/\30361 1310H Â»IS NOUÂ¥0rlddÂ¥ME!,92! Gll'GO iN34d013,A30 03NNÂ¥-Id NY-ld SlN3113AOMdINI 3-US P ME . k Â¥= 0 0-21*5 EXISTING & PROPOSED LEGEND : Vt i - 1 1 - Â»4- i f -8 j t, '6>131 ----7/ - -- Â·-74~' -- - EXIGY*;00,~TO~~re-L 0 E~STDIG CO~TM LFÂ° r.d._. ~~~ 43%22 5.333 --Â·Â·---q - Â· - --- EASâ„¢G WAT~-~1 3 --- l Â£~s-*6 -t-a,.~,a, --- 7 4-- - 5*-<-4< F 1 ) - -2. 2- - .- Â· -- Â· -- Â· - -- 2*iTI,0GtS -1- - ---- -- .~511.10.*TELE. c~12 -I l:- X - - -- --- Ejrn.K;LD",g-Â«)U.. 1--Â·Â· --Â· --- EmT.'OVE'/4.f LE... ~1 ~7 3~p E*IMT AVENUE . - -- -Â·- i -- Â·Â· - ./TW,flaeRCPT,C 1 ---1 j'///4,Â·,F~p Â·Â·I,3. c -#- r.42/.+I - - -- - -- ..... - V- f 3X 3%- ---- 1 .....-- '. ...... m.....â„¢,p. - -- E.48tD~~URM-,Â·Â£14 Dal,El*.YLDr 8 ...... - - 4 r ......... 101 ..NG DRAINâ€¢DE [*6â€¢nl 6 4, ' 40- 5151,~C /-1(*2 Now 1 n~ST-GTE~EmOEeeaJ~ 1 E.J...Uâ„¢..... â€¢Â·Â· UNOkâ€¢MW 1 0 TT E.ST~'.110-1 I. ' .1// I ~ ~ ~ i.' B#."WA..Rve ...... TOC~93* $3/q Toc.imir Â· Â· --- ~ 2='T~GO.~56,E'TER 4 1 1 i ' 1. '. ~ 00$' - . 2- k:' '*<.0*,1--8 lel Exi~TÂ»*1,1~â„¢PECESTA~ 4//9 I li Al!~20 41 04 -Â» I 8 2.....2-ac-,on /91 k .'.4 4 K'/4 -3 '1 TO["38. ,....4 44, f CHATEAU 1,~~9LL,U~VAUTWa ~ Â·Z ' ~, 10:- 1- '08,0'.1-= $60~TO~AN,Dwkki 0041QW .* CEYCFABPCH 12.5 /.Al, m50~f~~AFO,~ , r Wâ€¢Ii'W,%1...... 1 -,OSED,gW./.ER T~C: ,*. lili & / / 1 6 'F,+79.1. . i i It +1 : N l...... loc,9.1.4 -4 2 Kaeâ‚¬&..'I/'':.2 p-,~.*â€¢â€¢a,Â£PA- 22&12i,Â·i:.'â€¢31 44fy '- th-7 94Â¥ HOTEL .......*ING 709 E. 00.Nr AVE X. i :I'; li' 1 Â·... - LOT. 4,12.336. LK ..40/7/â€¢W -Â·-Â·Â·Â·,MA#,11 1,â€¢ 711/1 Ut =A f .If U. T=: TOC 79,1 ge m 7,40.03Â· loA ..14.- 10<7940.76' *40. 118Â· Toclo I To~ '... / I . :/ '6/5 ' M94143' fl."40'r / 1 1 4,0, 14'., SECONDROO* . TlÂ».a : 1 < 1 1 f A "E~EDL~~0~~CAN~Lâ€¢fall V f WArM#IVT~ATUIr %- ... . 9 I, I CUA'~UT 7~6.44' 1 : 6~941 1 TO~~*43)3 â„¢RiDLA,g*~An.4,~ + / ..f .44 0 I St : # -i 1 .4-- X/ ,% MATCHE- 1 . i / -.1 \ 4 &&8 = 15 Â· 4 Â·- W A 1 - ,4 40 = Â°Fi. .1 ..: /32222 4.- -5 /47 ....3 .,-7. 4 2 ~ Im, 0 --- , G HA PHIC SCALE 2 ~ 4,1 I , i . . - / , 58 '*ISÂ£OGTORM.I: 1 ...â€¢r -- . #,f 4. , - Â»lr U . - ~ '01'L,91,0, / i / - 21 -17 1 I. J. 1 44fc,â€¢.i~.â€¢%- . / Ilic..#J --h 1 (INFE. lienâ€¢ 20 I WAf-%.1'. --- w---__ hÂ« 1 4-\ ASPEN AIM 80}LDING 100 , .1 0. /\ --1-7 .- M.,01'N... -- 1 - SPOT ELEVATION LEGEND SITE BENCHMARK WMATi<*1: AN E(EvATÂ»ho# rn] 11908}DPI ~HE 6OW-Bt~OW./.L EOAâ€¢EDGEOFA'FHAL~ 392.Eli32323*1 *2 EXâ€¢E~XiST~IGGRAD~ FFEâ€¢F.........Al/ :M'.1~V'-1,-riNT-E-TE" -N-UNE.A, : F.â€¢AN..E FLâ€¢ROW'I LPâ€¢LOWPO'. WATCH EX â€¢.TCH EXISTING R~.1/RA~E[EVA.N TBCâ€¢Te?PBACKOFC- TOCâ€¢TOPOFCONCREIE ***C!~SLOPE .UE Know *ari below. Ca||before,oudlg. SPOTELEVAnON - Gom,â€ži* .TE: .14-16 mIFLE:70..cON.EleÂ®'.... -r 114.1 .I*'. JOB NO 14640 %- /2 NOILOON[SNOO " 34Â¥0 Mi- Dll 'DNIH33NI9N 3 StkidO 5 A.1...0 [HEUTTLE NELLHOTU *803,9-10 [ S.iNÂ¥11 nSNOE)1;A]0 | 3nN3AÂ¥1NVhlna 3 1N3Ad013A303hI 1310 NÂ¥ld 1OMINOO NOISOH3 9 9Nlan!9 NOLLÂ¥0118dy M3,AGN EllÂ¥130 1NENd013A30 03NNÂ¥ld - - -F J 1 CONCEPTUAL POST DEVELOPMENT ONSITE PEAK RUNOFF RATES: i. 00 BAg. Clo 1 1 ARÂ£A .0 aUIN Cim 1 1 AREA aloo Z ;. DURANT AVENUE 1 0 1 1 41,UMi (-1 I id,1 1 1 10 1 1.nn,11 i./,1 1 ./ 414~1 AND ST* LILL-a-.T,2 I 00.3 1 W I 1 I 052 I 6. I D.3 I 01. I P,FibU~TGaECON#~UD Li_1 0.66 | 3.71 | 0.0. I 0.168 I CL---iZIZiÂ¥__I-~â€¢T--_.g, I a. 1 5.1~,ITTAâ€ž 1 3 | 092 1 171 | Oll | 0.019 | | 3 | ~96 | 612 | a~05 | 0013 | -1--T o ig-T--I. - I - 0.6~ - 1 -ai-_] E â€¢-di-1 6ii T Uidii__L-&12-3 5Â·--%*521==ny \1_r.9 Lwin FOâ€¢-- /31 -/ - AN A PURM'...PAitAi 5 ! 06' ! in ! 0102 '255 4 1 5 ! 0.7. ! 632 r oIl I 0.42_ 3*600 -gri i 1 11 2<./Ch : - Li_L_ELLALL_liL-_1-81Ld 'll'.-Il'j ' Ili~-1:JI ....51./. 7 | 065 I /71 I O.034 | 0063 I =~~~~~_--= u' rti=â€ž=U-i-,_~-z - ;~~- - #_--_ - : - -__ - n - T 1- w- 5 CLEI_g.73 -I-~172_L_---g.~L-__1__-85 L_-1 1 0,m- Ls,9.E_1_0*-3 | 98 | 067 | 172 0099 | /246 | | 91 | 0.74 6/ 1 0/99--1-'ll L. 1 075 1.17 1 0.7 | 0242 ~ 1 . 1 ./ I G. 1 'CS, 1 0- 1 ?Frrr- --= & G LE_]Ja_1 m ! Â°m ! a- 1 1_-1_L-9:E- 1-&.--Im ! .= 1 r--- , 11 1 00 I 372 1 0/72 1 /]86 1 i n I 075 I 632 i ./71 I /343 I -. 372 .In |_0.2.--1 1 1, 1 352 1 62 1 0001. L '003 1 M 1- 11 . ---- Â·- ----- -------Â·----Â·----Â·-Â·. 'i ---Â· Â·--Â·------- ---------------- L_u_L_'91-3,2__29__1__Â£:EM_1 L.1 1 096 1 611 0,=3 1 '020 1 6 : 3 t j'-0---.- FT--- 1 Â· Â· ... 1 11 1 111 \--------7 1.15 1 0.61 1121-_ML-L_81-I I 15 I W l 6.12 1,_-92L_LAZE__I o U .-ALL_&11__EL_1_-82_1 Al/ | 0.72 | 6 12 1 o.6 1 0120 1 , B 2 E .'f~ -':L:.04.,4..... --i ~4 )' CHATEAU DUMONT CHATEAU CHAUIN CONCEPTUAL WATER QUALITY mEATMENT SUMMARY TABLE: .Â· :&==al.2 . JLA.,iÂ·*- *44 1 '.Hi' Â¥ 2 1... ,- + ; , icÂ·, Loc....1,4. rli--Tmmi=r-imT-'-W.Q....'ll.WI.'I WIOSO,PKNG ARLAIO PROV,00 ILÂ£01 welou,~Lirfâ„¢fAâ„¢iNT ... 1 BASIN 1 , , EMPERV / DEPTH'Ir' n,EAâ„¢ENT LOCAnON 1 4 1 9 - .... 10:41 E#'ZIZZE*IZEZIZZIEEZZIEZZIZEEREREEEGjREE] FOR ~44'6 - - --1 Â» ~ 1 .[1 71:11 .C 12 4 1491 606 0125 ~ 16 I LAND,CAPINGALONGNORrHS,DEOF ~~ 1 1 1 1 1 1 LEÂ«ICILZE!=*ZE=fil==Ii*Z=ZIEZE=liZE*Af*i#REEGEHERE' E 5 BUILDING 1 1 I .0 I I T .49 I 85% I 0 190 1 so 1 LANDSCAPING AUA WEST O~ ALPS PARKING I r-- Â· .. 9-~ E TV.ILT 0.01 Â· 1 L...2-1-_L-1.-82Â£1._.l__,Ra-_1_1. L...REM!.22.22/INE.2 [ 11 0.51". 0 - ' Â· j....5101 WQ CONâ„¢BUrING AREA | I wacv | WIC' PROPOSED (1/) I Â©41 1 , Â»ANNeA . - 221-L__L__-L-2L1_,22L1_._-Im..'.Il'....'....%'I 6,CCK 107M1Â£Â¥ i f Vi' 1 ...'1>t I W. CON.IMING| mi I .(r,1 RE' WQCV PnOPOSED 1 LE'-7.-4''iUMELL--EmaL_4....l...2!ELEd!2!~ IJJ'Â·/$Ill li 1---ti--t---4-4-- -9.-9------ - BUOWGRADE IN AUEYA~ONGEA~ SIDECP 1 -1 . 1 1 1 74% 0.15 1 65 Rd i MAI. 1 L,Mil---RA__L=iZZL-L-EL-1~ 1 1 1 1 BUUDING 4 - SFV 3 96 4298 84. 0/5 66 ...Se.ING A. A We OF ALPS PARKING |~41Â·, Li ~ ~ CONDOMIN!UMS - L i ' :'1 ; r-:6~Em------1 33] 87<*?u-,Til~LNm~Tle~(Illoplki~T=i#EPTUA- SU~NO 1Â«A~,ON 1 6,1 Ll 11 01 '41'CFI-IN.U .709E DURAN'FAVE .--- 6,Â«) rÂ¥pÂ·ES OF.~ wATER O.ki#â„¢EAâ„¢EifT #tD DIWIâ€¢,GE I.*RA810IUCTURE TO BE 1 LOT: 42,3369 9â€¢314 098 I .CÂ·ri.I'WIDSC-I $ im A Ii'11':1141 , I AREA....1./. PROPOSED LEGEND I i .....1!0..O - PROP/6.0 CON~OL. I I~ I ' IIi'' 'i 'r 79~ 0~MODArtâ‚¬.~APE - PI~)POSED,D,eDUA~~m~ 8 I== PleOS'DAM'Re' u 7 -=411 ----- POGTCIVE,OPME.1Ea-1 11-41 47 D h'-Â· 1 1-- ---( 11â€¢,/ 9- -.â€¢â€¢â€¢ .i~O31/'TC-gl'rE~ 1 ...4.J. --- ------ 0'd -) 111=--- -- - --3 0 -- --EEL Â·- --2-2Â·r-- U... 42,-1 - /- 1 .\6 / L - Â· 31 ' 4. nAg,4,10 17* 1 n,16 ywiti ~113~ ~ pos,oc C~ / T 'MAIN =========E===SU 6 1 1 . :.3% QUA...UNNU L m*wiâ€¢.AND 1 0 _-*Iwi-0~0~D...........T â„¢EN WN To.IMAIN ...Pal.......u'll jvt - _02 ..rm,dÂ¢,.i,$,u.4.--_.____- - I. -I TILE*'MiNT-*ASIN- - - -- - -- --- - 3 -671.7 --~POL-_rt_ / > p.posid...4.0, EXISTELEGEND 5 } ./.1.UNDURGILOUND,A...u...........0 PRCÂ¥IDEO ILia WATIR *E=WATEnOUAU~TR~T-FO=- E~lrfÂ»,G=* -~**=1' *T â€¢~~~ * r~ 264Â· ~4 K%%* W 1 1 1~,Ir*45{DI ASPEN ALPS BUILDING 100 t. -- - E.~TINQCD'TOL.~fT. ....a.-1~ 2/ \ . QUAWy TI,WMENIFOR . - - 4 8 CC 2 1 3 / 1 1 / 11 0 GRAPHIC SCALE .... (INFEET) ,(*3 hiO 14040 'In/â€¢ I Il REQUIDâ€¢CR,â€¢4... SHEET I NOIOnkliSNOO * s. -3-11 '9Nlh133NI 103rOkid IN)AldO3A3033 131OH A>IS .0,10'm -ERVITER--5-rl 3AN3AV1NÂ¥hIA .e,04(om) THE LITTLE NEIHOTEL -1/GIN Calv.130 1N3V,Id013A30 (3Nlf~ld EX]STING & PROPOSED LEGEND 1;~5â„¢0=W -,I- --Â· 2.ET-cx=*T~A...k I.TE J 2.-- 2.2 =.I'/i~.-- ~~ -+-- E;*,TI,0.ECT,1Â£. C~L W ------- ----- Â· ---- 145â„¢IGGUe.YE,ACA~Â£ 021- N- - Â·- ~ ---Â·- i - U.E.-)L~Â«).Cer. ",OvEkâ€¢15,1,~G a0 Z 11,514*1.WiTO--1~rÂ· ANO.TRIUC-Â£ . ~~ .â€ž--<uwbul.-Â£7~- Â· . i .... . - ....C'EU -----In ------ - -i. 1%+OVEAIâ‚¬AOEifCâ„¢C -*h_ . KX _ _- . -__ . --- - 0*sT,~UÂ¥*C.tTKÂ»IP~â‚¬ - ---,i --- -- t...F./.12 \-2 .1 - Mill _ ----- p-Â· Ins..STÂ¢*W./.R Â· -f,11 -0. -- -- --- ----- ..g. : 1,&..' coÂ£~~ECNUE .. I. , 1-' r *, f#L -. t- Â· ~IN mU -- E E~TDIGELEC~C~u*,OU F O.0,10*.UT l'WIL* . i.sr,00~.Â»â€¢. cm.. /?; I .*.Itâ‚¬k~MO...ae ..4 1. .....4 .....CCI"..0 9 ' Â·Â·r , ...Au'llâ€¢ - - -~ 4 'll....HYDRA~ V . 1 7 )61.4..U~ 'C .~â„¢CM.RIAL. PÂ·< #Il. WW,#r PER,I~.LA~ I E-'...Ue 57~ R. E.I.T.,SW... 1 I ............ 1 1 â„¢':125'Lut[ .0. ~-- TOR/~.-_Â» - - . EaTIL ..Fi-...AL I Entâ„¢,1.Tv.CESâ„¢ Acclit~A4MI â€¢~~ ; -Â· 4.. / 0â€¢,Nu.w,u, - 9.N. & Em......CUA)Â£,UT 1 1- eC Â£*21...C- Pcx.~ , , Wle' 0.-'.1 . '**MR!,1112ET B i i ' 2 11 lfÂ¥.... # = n~=:SMâ€žf -- =ReerfEI~.. P ' .............U ClriCAS,EN 28 Iwi ...- p.loni...../.-4 1 044, 1 1 - yi inl Mika-vurw, , ,-. ...Â·1 /J601 Ell,-f pp~]po,ED,Trnâ€¢,Ise.4.m EAU DUMOI CHATEAU CHAUMI /914. f A.!Or~11WM~i -8. i :f ; k --/ I ilti.?. 1 2- 11 , - . '#.:IM- 1 ~) , H *-4/ -â€ž I---Â·Â·* 'i--. -I P~rc6~D-eAD~:r,C f tÂ·l i. *Er'Â¢~1 Â· ' 8 --- ' UNDE....WAI' m. IRAFFIC.HOTNE# ' 3 ' .- - I .i. fF / ,/ / L.- - ..3 ' I -I ........Of F.Ii / r ORA.....E~TON'. RONOP..WATE...1/ i? 0 | L_. kimp:#F~Famw.-2-0An~ePAVEAS ., i z , / /.9 :Â¥: 1 2 l, : 1 4 4Â·:, -/ ....OLA.a(~WÂ«; If.Â£ i l SKÂ¥ HOTE p. 07:42.32. -- -- 1 -5Â· ...%-aci i 709 E.OURA / 1 ..1,1 --11 140,. 1(DTOUN 1 . w .*CTOPROPOID./'GR.... F~TIR TUATMEUT WUT OR Aili-IM' 1 P cluu,rÂ¥,Rul,al,NE]un L#I'.Al'mA./WAIER 'VAUTIrl.AT-I 71== P'Il ''/1 A *,9 ~NID~.ROU~*/ au.UIYT~Aâ„¢Uff VAUU 11 1 I ...1 1-0 * - OUUITYTILAAIMINI~AUL I,ORYHOLE Lir~ 4 . =246* W.DOM'Ul.15 Ulâ€¢ -]*011 U,Â®SCAPEA....... 111 q - lif,3 / *Hr..-* . 0,1[in./.6...... \10..:.....â€žle. !,- , . -/ - XI ..â€žm'- /......I- B I ./.-- / L*8~15TORM I , 01,1.4 1.,1 PUL COA \ SIAND,4~ t#. . .-':.r.<*_.Lti~ C-'-- - --- i ,& .~~,: \..... 9â€ž0?M V .\I ..-WEL' I. C .1 r Â»-Â«37- 1 \ /4 2, , - Ul N. 1 1/ , 2 Z GRAPHIC SCALE luu . (INFEET) Cal|bofor,youdle. DATE: .14-16 linch= 20 n REDUCED'ORS.1.TAL es/Fi= JOB No. 14040 SHEET . NOUORMISNOO ...m ..ro S.11.1 Â·311 '9Nl)133NI9N 3 SladÂ° S 1N3rld013A303hl 1310H.DIS ABC]-51530 i SiNÂ¥11(19NOD lIA[) | anN3AÂ¥1NninCl'3 60Â£ "4Â£ UTTLE NELLMOTEi EIE~Ol-(O.Â· 'EM,0.J NOUVorkiN ua,gu GI3llÂ¥13(1 1N3rldO-13/GO (13NNÂ¥ld GENERAL UTILITY NOTES: , corTRArT{:Â»,70./W-ATE.AENT../0=ATID' ...... C,./ EAilll6 ~Uâ„¢S wa,411Â«,n,17Â¥,RO,~DEFa CQ,~Rd,CTC,WOPINJOEAUTREHCÂ»* l A,CO~Â·acal M r.1- Imvile ,& IP F.- N, l,ngÂ¥ - 2 -/ ge= - 25 % h. J ....,0.WI'l. f *I -,1rfr- ---~ / . MAINM~C~~WER ~~ - f DEFA,~14"i ~T'...=--h . - ~ I -LOCA*...2.1/I'll'.IT*'#..PlOTTEDa.,SCOON......,11Â¤c~B ~ ~ - -Or"a,a.101,-0,1*5"UTUTÂ¥.Â£,1-4.5-...F.......... Z oURANI - /0,8/ Na AWÂ¥.Md,CE, TO. ) 1. J,TIO,1 1..e/,CES CA,-ee. 4CT~ - -._ ~-AQ#Il. ' 4~-% i,o,tioc;c,arn= I c~â„¢.Cl'OR//Coo~*aTIA'Ln~nul,I.o,4n,mlâ„¢EF~apecm,~Ir'll'-Il Â¥ & g:-Â¢110.1 - . 4 i / / PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS NOTE: 'A i ~eal,clpAS,EN=.A,Â©~1~)S, p,EUÂ¢.MC)*WS,NT,â‚¬~Â¥-ST.mETT}ECr'r, ,~29,*11,5 1~c,-Eo pl,cl* Toct-EÂ»StuE,~c, il,Uâ€ž. 1 i _-2 b- .,1 2 -f -. tlfi,.# --2277'. 1 ./9 .SHALLOW UTILIU NOTES: AND CliAlE..... --- â€¢0205,DE~~,C ~ 1,L-â„¢Â·C -Â»7--1 fz--- -. 1 . 1 iÂ·*=9~= \ A '/ l 5 1 6-'47 1/ ,j ! ~ ....tNÂ»** .-'%64 f 'le....8/huGiE......WI-./..........4.-Ill... . /"Il 0,0,Â©ioce-mcw-1 ' / J.A--- p===2 \ r / i N ~- C f i Z~*~MU~UN;~~~ZZ~*~5-s ,â€¢â€¢,2.*115&~ i /'; ' -.LAT CHATEAU CttATEAU CHAUMONT I,*rEA-ario~,~tw,c.iL#,cot l :U ; :- 1 .,I ' 0,5,- ,xâ€ž-â„¢pl~*.Hs'. -, m:~* -00â€ž,- A ' U . ti / OPT.c.CA~U,-Cisioli,W / / \ ~ 1. C~01.ETU~ /1-0 9,411â‚¬JIL.*~~Al'i,A" hk \\ 00*lip - 'i , M.h & ; 1 ----- f UnLITY PLAN LEGEND 9 0, I li E 1 , Z , 2 -' - i......... ...CS~'~M~WSE~ERSE~~ 0 4 1-+Wt f AIANDONE~STINGIEU~gENO ' 0 1. 1 -~ -- - F..08!./. M j .........FL..... 1 J A~~a/&SMÂ¥~IlullnY-ObÂ«**3 ----- . ---Â·- - ------- P~~OSEDTELD9O* / 1-4 -. -' - I.;I.ED *HO~TIC M .*.uM.mN. i 1 ~In UnurY,~EMCIE,!.2-1,1 -:-- - t- PIKJFCÂ»EOSTC~-SEÂ¥,re ,iwere -481 - -i? ---,- H 'AcpOSEDGA-#ALVE L' 1 f 11 4 8 SKY ./.El . 11:' ili 2/ P -. /9/id' A i LOT+42.3369 -- - - --64-*L- I / 8.4 4 L H .Il ~..:.. t L -Il 'El ' d ---- ~- --- EJU...0/* RE,*CMeaSTINaEUCrniC ...:.-Â»Â«22-4- .4-- --2/-%---99.-\{4 l p 4 1 fi .. . "9â„¢GDTO,W.%11Â£" - 6~1811,0ELEC.TELE, CAA.,Â£1~5 1,1*WO...........Ly ...... Â· Â·Â·- . -- i;,0111CELECTELE. c,AE 8 c,0~,141*Gr'IN,1.1.; -- ,m/,0 ./ - Â·Â·- Â·-Â·- - El*/W-:. r .1 i i .......~1.R-.... - -- 2)2~,4001,0~EADe= -- --- -- - WT=.. --- j i/f1-/ GLORYHOLE -- -- mE.... 1 i .:/Â»Ad. 5 ...h , ri j };!,1 f . y Ge 2/.Â£C-#~.Om-EU IM f ' ........ 37 Eâ€¢â€¢DIg'i.*.* I In,NONE. 1â€žâ€¢.f 0 ~-WA.I.". X -= - .,/ r : 111 2 '79:~ '4 : ragÂ·, ....1 I .r_ - - P, e,e~~-- t.2 + 3 U m N- I. I "lin 1 1 .4 ~J e~5,DIGELECM,CnweÂ©,4~R â€¢1 ....TnE,1Â£,1,~p'... ,O a. An,1~x>,4,D . 'M........ . /-4 f r J 0 8%â„¢GUEWERC.NM Â¢ I \ .1 1 -- . .AG..LIGI~POLU . I al - 1 -Cy--k 1/ R Fi-d i in -rr /4/IN, GION . Ii,J,7~6.01Â«,1,LE' It 1 Â·Â· - - 5% 7-â„¢- ASPEN _ *)**,TunT--- 1-_ ; 1 .M ' Il~ ALPS BUIGING 100 -,1 D I I %-7-----* r---- - . 7+.#.-i--. - -h .tw-Â·' ./ ia ..3 , & 5 0 GRAPHIC SCALE a Kno:327 (IN FEET) Ca|| beloreyou dig. SUEREDUCÂ£DFORSLB,!TAL 140'10 1 Inch â€¢ i. I .A~E: 4+16 44//ES. 6HE- CS NOI1OnaLSNOO 31*] SmliNI 711 'SNIN)3NIDN Ag"".0 .EUTTINE1LHO [ SiNÂ¥11 f'ISNOD 11Al] | 1.N~na '3 60L 1N3rld013A303 I -1310H.DIS M31A3W Ci3-~130 1N31Nd013A30 03NNÂ¥ld ATTACHMENT E URBAN DRAINAGE RUNOFF SPREADSHEETS CALCULATION OF A PEAK RUNOFF USING RATIONAL METHOD Project Title: Sky Hotel Catchment ID: Basin 1 1. Catchment Hydrologic Data Catchment ID = 1 Area = 0.033 Acres Percent Imperviousness = 50.00 % NRCS Soil Type = B A, B, C, or D - Il. Rainfall Information I (inch/hr) = Cl * Pl /((2 + Td)AC3 Design Storm Return Period, Tr = 100 years (input return period for design storm) Cl = 35.60 (input the value of Cl) 02= 6.60 (input the value of C2) C3= 0.852 (input the value of C3) Pl= 0.47 inches (input one-hr precipitation--see Sheet "Design Info") 111. Analysis of Flow Time (Time of Concentration) for a Catchment Runoff Coefficient, C = 0.52 Overide Runoff Coefficient, C = (enter an overide C value if desired, or leave blank to accept calculated C.) 5-yr. Runoff Coefficient, C-5 = 0.35 Overide 5-yr. Runoff Coefficient, C = (enter an overide C-5 value if desired, or leave blank to accept calculated C-5.) Illustration overland LEQUill Reach 1 11(M ./ Reach 2 + U Beginni. FlunÂ· Directiun /cfr- eu6 / Catehment --''Reach 3 Boundia NRCS Land Heavy Tillage/ Short Nearty Grassed Paved Areas & Type Meadow Field Pasture/ Bare Swales/ Shallow Paved Swales Lawns Ground Waterways (Sheet Flow) Conveyance 2.5 5 7 10 15 20 Calculations: Reach Slope ~ Length ~ 5-yr NRCS Flow Flow 1 ID S L Runoff Convey- Velocity Time Coeff ance V Tf ft/ft ft (-5 fps minutes input input output input output output Overland 0.35 N/A 0.00 0.00 2 3 4 5 Sum 0 Computed Tc = 0.00 Regional Tc = 10.00 User-Entered Tc = 5.00 IV. Peak Runoff Prediction Rainfall Intensity at Computed Tc, 1 = inch/hr Peak Flowrate, Qp = cfs Rainfall Intensity at Regional Tc, 1 = inch/hr Peak Flowrate, Qp = cfs Rainfall Intensity at User-Defined Tc, 1 = 2.07 inch/hr Peak Flowrate, Qp = 0.04 cfs BASIN1-100yr.xls, Tc and PeakQ 7/6/2015, 10:21 AM Y CALCULATION OF A PEAK RUNOFF USING RATIONAL METHOD Project Title: Sky Hotel Catchment ID: Basin 2 1. Catchment Hydrologic Data Catchment ID = 2 Area = 0.053 Acres Percent Imperviousness 97.00 % NRCS Soil Type = B A, B, C, or D Il. Rainfall Information I (inch/hr) = Cl * Pl /((2 + Td)AC3 Design Storm Return Period, Tr = 10 years (input return period for design storm) Cl = 35.60 (input the value of Cl) 02= 6.60 (input the value of C2) (3= 0.852 (input the value of C3) Pl= 0.47 inches (input one-hr precipitation--see Sheet "Design Info") Ill. Analysis of Flow Time (Time of Concentration) for a Catchment Runoff Coefficient, C = 0.86 Overide Runoff Coefficient, C = (enter an overide C value if desired, or leave blank to accept calculated C.) 5-yr. Runoff Coefficient, C-5 = 0.84 1Â» Overide 5-yr. Runoff Coefficient, C = (enter an overide C-5 value if desired, or leave blank to accept calcu[ated C-5.) Illustration - -0-lerl-a T LEGEND /- Reach 1 flow j - Reach 2 + O B*ming ---0,1 Fl(,w Direction Â·Â·-~each.3 Catchment Boundary NRCS Land Heavy Tillage/ Short Nearly Grassed Paved Areas & Type Meadow Field Pasture/ Bare Swales/ Shallow Paved Swales Lawns Ground Waterways (Sheet Flow) Conveyance 2.5 5 7 10 15 20 Calculations: Reach | Slope Length 5-yr NRCS Flow Flow b ID S L Runoff Convey- Velocity Time Coeff ance V Tf un ft C-5 fps minutes input input output input output output Overland 0.84 N/A 0.00 0.00 1 1 I 2 1 -. 3 4 1 5 Sum 0 Computed Tc = 0.00 Regional Tc = 10.00 User-Entered Tc = 5.00 IV. Peak Runoff Prediction Rainfall Intensity at Computed Tc, I = inch/hr Peak Flowrate, Qp = efs Rainfall Intensity at Regional Tc, I = inch/hr Peak Flowrate, Qp = efs Rainfall Intensity at User-Defined Tc, 1 = 2.07 inch/hr Peak Flowrate, Qp = 0.09 ofs l BASIN2-1 Oyr.xls, Tc and PeakQ 7/6/2015, 10:21 AM CALCULATION OF A PEAK RUNOFF USING RATIONAL METHOD Project Title: Sky Hotel Catchment ID: Basin 2 1. Catchment Hydrologic Data Catchment ID = 2 Area = 0.053 Acres Percent Imperviousness = 97.00 % NRCS Soil Type = B A, B, C, or D Il. Rainfall Information I (inch/hr) = Cl * Pl ,((2 + Td)~(3 Design Storm Return Period, Tr = 100 years (input return period for design storm) Cl = 35.60 (input the value of Cl) C2= 6.60 (input the value of 02) C3= 0.852 (input the value of C3) Pl= 0.47 inches (input one-hr precipitation--see Sheet "Design Info") 111. Analysis of Flow Time (Time of Concentration) for a Catchment Runoff Coefficient, C = 0.91 - Overide Runoff Coefficient, C = (enter an overide C value if desired, or leave blank to accept calculated C.) 5-yr. Runoff Coefficient, C-5 = 0.84 Overide 5-yr. Runoff Coefficient, C = (enter an overide C-5 value if desired, or leave blank to accept calculated C-5.) Illustration 73 -_----_~Dt- -oUr-land Y LEGEND / ReAh 1 flev Reach 2 5 O Beginning -' -/U El-Â· Dimetion 27% Catchment '-' Reach 3 Boundary NRCS Land Heavy Tillage/ Short Nearly Grassed Paved Areas & Type Meadow Field Pasture/ Bare Swales/ Shallow Paved Swales Lawns Ground Waterways (Sheet Flow) Conveyance 2.5 5 7 10 15 20 Calculations: Reach Slope Length | 5-yr NRCS Flow Flow ID S L Runoff Convey- Velocity Time Coeff ance V Tf ft/ft ft C-5 fps minutes input input output input output output Overland 0.84 N/A 0.00 0.00 I 1 1 2 3 4 5 Sum 0 Computed Tc = 0.00 Regional Tc = 10.00 User-Entered Tc = 5.00 IV. Peak Runoff Prediction Rainfall Intensity at Computed Tc, 1 = inch/hr Peak Flowrate, Qp = efs Rainfall Intensity at Regional Tc, 1 = inch/hr Peak Flowrate, Qp = cfs Rainfall Intensity at User-Defined Tc, 1 = 2.07 inch/hr Peak Flowrate, Qp = 0.10 efs BASIN2-100yr.xls, Tc and PeakQ 7/6/2015,10:22 AM CALCULATION OF A PEAK RUNOFF USING RATIONAL METHOD Project Title: Sky Hotel Catchment ID: Basin 3 1. Catchment Hydrologic Data Catchment ID = 3 Area = 0.005 Acres 1-7 Percent Imperviousness = 100.00 % NRCS Soil Type = B A, B, C, or D ll. Rainfall Information I (inch/hr) = Cl * Pl /((2 + Td)AC3 1 Design Storm Return Period, Tr = 10 years (input return period for design storm) Cl = 35.60 (input the value of Cl) C2= 6.60 (input the value of C2) C3= 0.852 (input the value of C3) Pl= 0.47 inches (input one-hr precipitation--see Sheet "Design Info") 111. Analysis of Flow Time (Time of Concentration) for a Catchment Runoff Coefficient: C = 0.92 Overide Runoff Coefficient, C = (enter an overide C value if desired, or leave blank to accept calculated C.) 5-yr. Runoff Coefficient, C-5 = 0.90 Overide 5-yr. Runoff Coefficient, C = (enter an overide C-5 value if desired, or leave blank to accept calculated C-5.) Illustration - overland LEGEND /- bach 1 fl~nv - Reach 2 * O Beginning F[mv Directinn Catchment / Reach 3 Boundau ~lk NRCS Land Heavy Tillage/ Short Nearly Grassed Paved Areas & Type Meadow Field Pasture/ Bare Swales/ Shallow Paved Swales Lawns Ground Waterways (Sheet Flow) Conveyance 2.5 5 7 10 15 20 Calculations: Reach Slope Length 5-yr NRCS Flow Flow ID S L Runoff Convey- Velocity Time Coeff ance V Tf ft/ft ft C-5 fps minutes input input output input output output Overland 0.90 N/A 0.00 0.00 1 2 3 4 5 Sum 0 Computed Tc == 0.00 Regional Tc = 10.00 User-Entered Tc = 5.00 IV. Peak Runoff Prediction Rainfall Intensity at Computed Tc, I = inch/hr Peak Flowrate, Qp = cfs Rainfall Intensity at Regional Tc, 1 = inch/hr Peak Flowrate, Qp = cfs Rainfall Intensity al User-Defined Tc, I = 2.07 inch/hr Peak Flowrate, Qp = 0.01 cfs BASIN3-10yr.xls, Tc and PeakQ 7/6/2015, 10:22 AM - CALCULATION OF A PEAK RUNOFF USING RATIONAL METHOD Project Title: Sky Hotel Catchment ID: Basin 3 'r. 2 1. Catchment Hydrologic Data Catchment ID = 3 Area = 0.005 Acres Percent Imperviousness = 100.00 % NRCS Soil Type = B A, B, C, or D Il. Rainfall Information I (inch/hr) = Cl * Pl /(C2 + Td)AC3 Design Storm Return Period, Tr = 100 years (input return period for design storm) Cl = 35.60 (input the value of Cl ) (2= 6.60 (input the value of (2) C3= 0.852 (input the value of C3) Pl= 0.47 inches (input one-hr precipitation--see Sheet "Design Info") Ill. Analysis of Flow Time (Time of Concentration) for a Catchment Runoff Coefficient, C = 0.96 Overide Runoff Coefficient, C = (enter an overide C value if desired, or leave blank to accept calculated C.) 5-yr. Runoff Coefficient. C-5 = 0.90 Overide 5-yr. Runoff Coefficient, C = (enter an overide C-5 value if desired, or leave blank to accept calculated C-5.) Illustration overland LEGEND / Reach 1 flm' Reach 2 .f O Beginning Flow Direction Catchment + Reach 3 Boundar,Â· A, NRCS Land Heavy Tillage/ Short Nearly Grassed Paved Areas & Type Meadow Field Pasture/ Bare Swales/ Shallow Paved Swales Lawns Ground Waterways (Sheet Flow) Conveyance 2.5 5 7 10 15 20 Calculations: Reach ' Slope Length 5-yr NRCS ' Flow Flow ID S L Runoff Convey- Velocity Time Coeff ance V Ti ft/ft ft C-5 fps minutes input input output input output output Overland 0.90 N/A 0.00 0.00 1 1 2 3 1 4 5 Sum 0 Computed Tc = 0.00 Regional Tc = 10.00 User-Entered Tc = 5.00 IV. Peak Runoff Prediction Rainfall Intensity at Computed Tc, 1 = inch/hr Peak Flowrate, Qp = cfs Rainfall Intensity at Regional Tc, I = inch/hr Peak Flowrate, Qp = efs Rainfall Intensity at User-Defined Tc, I = 2.07 inch/hr Peak Flowrate, Qp = 0.01 efs BASIN3-100yr.xls, Tc and PeakQ 7/6/2015, 10:23 AM CALCULATION OF A PEAK RUNOFF USING RATIONAL METHOD Project Title: Sky Hotel Catchment ID: Basin 4 1. Catchment Hydrologic Data Catchment ID = 4 Area = 0.034 Acres , Percent Impervioustless = 64.00 % NRCS Soil Type = B A, B, C, or D Il. Rainfall Information I (inch/hr) = Cl * Pl /((2 + Td)AC3 Design Storm Return Period, Tr = 10 years (input return period for design storm) Cl = 35.60 (input the value of Cl) C2= 6.60 (input the value of 02) C3= 0.852 (input the value of C3) Pl= 0.47 inches (input one-hr precipitation--see Sheet "Design Info") 111. Analysis of Flow Time (Time of Concentration) for a Catchment Runoff Coefficient, C = 0.49 Overide Runoff Coefficient, C = center an overide C value if desired, or leave blank to accept calculated C.) 5-yr. Runoff Coefficient, C-5 = 0.44 Overide 5-yr. Runoff Coefficient, C = (enter an overide C-5 value if desired, or leave blank to accept calculated C-5.) Illustration overland LEGEND /T- Reach 1 flm' O Beginning Re~licf F[= Direction ' Catchmint /*-Reach 3 Bounder,r ' NRCSLand Heavy Tillage/ Short Nearly Grassed Paved Areas & Type Meadow Field Pasture/ Bare Swates/ Shallow Paved Swates Lawns Ground Waterways (Sheet Flow) Conveyance 2.5 5 7 10 15 20 Calculations: Reach Length 5-yr NRCS Flow Flow ' Slope ID S L Runoff Convey- Velocity Time Coeff ance V Tf ft/ft ft C-5 fps minutes input input output input output output Overland 0.44 N/A 1 0.00 0.00 1 I 2 1 1 3 11 4 1 1 1 5 1 Sum 0 Computed Tc = 0.00 r--Â·, Regional Tc = 10.00 User-Entered Tc = 5.00 IV. Peak Runoff Prediction Rainfall Intensity at Computed Tc, 1 = inch/hr Peak Flowrate, Qp = cfs ' Rainfall Intensity at Regional Tc, 1 = inch/hr Peak Flowrate, Qp = cfs Rainfall Intensity at User-Defined Tc, I = 2.07 inch/hr Peak Flowrate, Qp = 0.03 cfs j BASIN4-10yr.xls, Tc and PeakQ 7/6/2015, 10:23 AM CALCULATION OF A PEAK RUNOFF USING RATIONAL METHOD Project Title: Sky Hotel Catchment ID: Basin 4 1. Catchment Hydrologic Data Catchment ID = 4 Area = 0.034 Acres Percent Imperviousness = 64.00 % NRCS Soil Type = B A, B, C, or D 11. Rainfall Information I (inch/hr) = Cl * Pl /((2 + Td)\(3 - - Design Storm Return Period, Tr = 100 years (input return period for design storm) Cl = 35.60 (input the value of Cl) C2= 6.60 (input the value of C2) 03= 0.852 (input the value of C3) Pl= 0.47 inches (input one-hr precipitation--see Sheet "Design Info") 111. Analysis of Flow Time (Time of Concentration) for a Catchment Runoff Coefficient, C = 0.58 Overide Runoff Coefficient, C = (enter an overide C value if desired, or leave blank to accept calculated C.) 5-yr. Runoff Coefficient, C-5 = 0.44 Overide 5-yr. Runoff Coefficient, C = (enter an overide C-5 value if desired, or leave blank to accept calculated C-5.) Illustration Dic ------ Ah mrerland ' LEGEND / Rearh 1 nt.v Reach 2 --~ O Beginning _1) Flow Di~dirn t=Reach 3 Boundger Catchment A. NRCS Land Heavy Tillage/ Short Nearly Grassed Paved Areas & Type Meadow Field Pasture/ Bare Swales/ Shallow Paved Swales Lawns Ground Waterways (Sheet Flow) Conveyance 2.5 5 7 10 15 20 Calculations: Reach Slope Length 5-yr NRCS Flow Flow ID S L Runoff Convey- Velocity Time Coeff ance V Tf flift ft C-5 fps minutes input input output input output output Overland 0.44 N/A 0.00 0.00 1 2 3 4 5 Sum 0 Computed Tc = 0.00 Regional Tc = 10.00 User-Entered Tc = 5.00 IV. Peak Runoff Prediction Rainfall Intensity at Computed Tc, I = inch/hr Peak Flowrate, Qp = cfs Rainfall Intensity at Regional Tc, 1 = inch/hr Peak Flowrate, Qp = cfs Rainfall Intensity at User-Defined Tc, 1 = 2.07 inch/hr Peak Flowrate, Qp = 0.04 efs 41 BASIN4-100yr.xls, Tc and PeakQ 7/6/2015, 10:29 AM CALCULATION OF A PEAK RUNOFF USING RATIONAL METHOD Project Title: Sky Hotel Catchment ID: Basin 5 1. Catchment Hydrologic Data Catchment ID = 5 Area = 0.102 Acres Percent Imperviousness = 84.00 % NRCS Soil Type = B A, B, C, or D Il. Rainfall Information I (inch/hr) = Cl * Pl /((2 + Td)â€ž(3 Design Storm Return Period, Tr = 10 years (input return period for design storm) Cl = 35.60 (input the value of Cl) , C2= 6.60 (input the value of C2) 03= 0.852 (input the value of C3) Pl= 0.47 inches (input one-hr precipitation--see Sheet "Design Info") Ill. Analysis of Flow Time (Time of Concentration) for a Catchment Runoff Coefficient, C = 0.67 Overide Runoff Coefficient, C = (enter an overide C value if desired, or leave blank to accept calculated C.) 5-yr. Runoff Coefficient, C-5 = 0.64 Overide 5-yr. Runoff Coefficient, C = (enter an overide C-5 value if desired, or leave blank to accept calculated C-5.) Illustration LEGEND Reach l O Beginning d 3 / Catchment '' Reach 3 Boundary NRCS Land Heavy Tillage/ Short Nearly Grassed Paved Areas & Type Meadow Field Pasture/ Bare Swales/ Shallow Paved Swales Lawns Ground Waterways (Sheet Flow) Conveyance 2.5 5 7 10 15 20 Calculations: Reach Slope Length 5-yr NRCS Flow Flow ID S L Runoff Convey- Velocity Time Coeff ance V 11 ft/ft ft C-5 fps minutes input input output input output output Overland 0.64 N/A 0.00 0.00 1 2 3 4 5 Sum 0 Computed Tc = 0.00 Regional Tc = 10.00 User-Entered Tc = 5.00 IV. Peak Runoff Prediction Rainfall Intensity at Computed Tc, I = inch/hr Peak Flowrate, Qp = cfs Rainfall Intensity at Regional Tc, 1 = inch/hr Peak Flowrate, Qp = cfs Rainfall Intensity at User-Defined Tc, 1 = 2.07 inch/hr Peak Flowrate, Qp = 0.14 cfs BASIN5-10yr.xls, Tc and PeakQ 7/6/2015: 10:30 AM -3 CALCULATION OF A PEAK RUNOFF USING RATIONAL METHOD Project Title: Sky Hotel Catchment ID: Basin 5 1. Catchment Hydrologic Data Catchment ID = 5 Area = 0.102 Acres ' Percent Imperviousness = 84.00 % NRCS Soil Type = B A, B, C, or D ll. Rainfall Information I (inch/hr) = Cl * Pl /((2 + Td)AC3 Design Storm Return Period, Tr = 100 years (input return period for design storm) Cl = 35.60 (input the value of Cl) C2= 6.60 (input the value of C2) C3= 0.852 (input the value of C3) Pl= 0.47 inches (input one-hr precipitation--see Sheet "Design Info") Ill. Analysis of Flow Time (Time of Concentration) for a Catchment Runoff Coefficient, C = 0.74 Overide Runoff Coefficient, C = (enter an overide C value if desired, or leave blank to accept calculated C.) 5-yr. Runoff Coefficient, C-5 = 0.64 Overide 5-yr. Runoff Coefficient, C = (enter an overide C-5 value if desired, or leave blank to accept calculated C-5.) Illustration LEGEND Rearh 1 ne / Reach 2 j O Begimling -fo Flmr Dilection rt-- Catchment -< Reach 3 Boundaar NRCS Land Heavy Tillage/ Short Nearly Grassed Paved Areas & Type Meadow Field Pasture/ Bare Swales/ Shallow Paved Swales Lawns Ground Waterways (Sheet Flow) Conveyance 2.5 5 7 10 15 20 Calculations: ~ Reach Slope ' Length 5-yr NRCS Flow Flow ID S L Runoff Convey- Velocity Time Coeff ance V Tf ft/ft ft C-5 fps minutes input input output input output output Overland 0.64 N/A 0.00 0.00 1 2 3 4 1 5 Sum 0 Computed Tc = 0.00 Regional Tc = 10.00 User-Entered Tc = 5.00 ]V. Peak Runoff Prediction Rainfall Intensity at Computed Tc, 1 = inch/hr Peak Flowrate, Qp = cfs + Peak Flowrate, Qp = Rainfall Intensity at Regional Tc, 1 = inch/hr cfs Rainfall Intensity at User-Defined Tc, 1 = 2.07 inch/hr Peak Flowrate, Qp = 0.16 efs BASIN5-100yr.xls, Tc and PeakQ 7/6/2015: 10Â·30 AM -~ CALCULATION OF A PEAK RUNOFF USING RATIONAL METHOD Project Title: Sky Hotel Catchment ID: Basin 6 1. Catchment Hydrologic Data Catchment ID = 6 Area = 0.119 Acres Percent Imperviousness = 74.00 % NRCS Soil Type = B A, B, C, or D ll. Rainfall Information I (inch/hr) = Cl * Pl /(C2 + Td)AC3 10 years (input return period for design storm) Design Storm Return Period. Tr = Cl = 35.60 (input the value of Cl) C2= 6.60 (input the value of C2) C3= 0.852 (input the value of C3) Pl= 0.47 inches (input one-hr precipitation--see Sheet "Design Info") Ill. Analysis of Flow Time (Time of Concentration) for a Catchment Runoff Coefficient, C = 0.57 Overide Runoff Coefficient, C = Center an overide C value if desired, or leave blank to accept calculated C.) 5-yr. Runoff Coefficient, C-5 = 0.53 Overide 5-yr. Runoff Coefficient, C = (enter an overide C-5 value if desired, or leave blank to accept calculated C-5.) Illustration - .Â·-~ch 1 overland ~ LEGEND flmv /~ Reachl g ~ O Begilming 1 Fl~n' Dirertion $ 1 / Calc}unent '--Reach 3 Boundar, 15 NRCS Land Heavy Tillage/ Short Nearly Grassed Paved Areas & Type Meadow Field Pasture/ Bare Swales/ Shallow Paved Swales Lawns Ground Waterways (Sheet Flow) Conveyance 2.5 5 7 10 15 20 Calculations: Reach Slope Length ' 5-yr ' NRCS Flow Flow ID S L Runoff Convey- Velocity Time Coeff ance V Tf ft/ft ft C-5 fps minutes input input output ' input output output Overland 0.53 N/A 0.00 0.00 1 1 2 3 4 5 Sum 0 Computed Tc = 0.00 Regional Tc = 10.00 User-Entered Tc = 5.00 IV. Peak Runoff Prediction Rainfall Intensity at Computed Tc, 1 = inch/hr Peak Flowrate, Qp = cfs Rainfall Intensity at Regional Tc, I = inch/hr Peak Flowrate, Qp = cfs Rainfall Intensity at User-Defined Tc, 1 = 2.07 inch/hr Peak Flowrate, Qp = 0.14 efs BASIN6-10yr.xls, Tc and PeakQ 7/6/2015,10:30 AM CALCULATION OF A PEAK RUNOFF USING RATIONAL METHOD Project Title: Sky Hotel Catchment ID: Basin 6 1. Catchment Hydrologic Data Catchment ID = 6 Area = 0.119 Acres Percent Imperviousness = 74.00 % NRCS Soil Type = B A, B, C, or D ll. Rainfall Information I (inch/hr) = Cl * Pl /((2 + Td)AC3 Design Storm Return Period, Tr = 100 years (input return period for design storm) Cl = 35.60 (input the value of Cl) C2= 6.60 (input the value of C2) 03= 0.852 (input the value of C3) Pl= 0.47 inches (input one-hr precipitation--see Sheet "Design Info") Ill. Analysis of Flow Time (Time of Concentration) for a Catchment Runoff Coefficient, C = 0.65 Overide Runoff Coefficient, C = (enter an overide C value if desired, or leave blank to accept calculated C.) 5-yr. Runoff Coefficient, C-5 = 0.53 Overide 5-yr. Runoff Coefficient, C = (enter an overide C-5 value if desired, or leave blank to accept calculated C-5.) Illustration overland T LEGEND :' Reach 1 finv i - ~00<- Reach 2 -*~ % O Beginning -L) Elm Dimction 1 Catchment /Reach 3 Boundary Ar NRCS Land Heavy Tillage/ Short Nearly Grassed Paved Areas & Type Meadow Field Pasture/ Bare Swales/ Shallow Paved Swales Lawns Ground Waterways (Sheet Flow) Conveyance 2.5 5 7 10 15 20 Calculations: Reach Slope Length 5-yr NRCS Flow Flow ID S L Runoff Convey- Velocity Time Coeff ance V Tf ft/ft ft C-5 fps minutes input input output input output output Overland 0.53 N/A 0.00 0.00 1 2 3 4 5 Sum 0 Computed Tc = 0.00 Regional Tc = 10.00 User-Entered Tc = 5.00 IV. Peak Runoff Prediction Rainfall Intensity at Computed Tc, 1 = inch/hr Peak Flowrate, Qp = cfs Rainfall Intensity at Regional Te, 1 = inch/hr Peak Flowrate, Qp = cfs Rainfall Intensity at User-Defined Te, 1 = 2.07 inch/hr Peak Flowrate, Qp = 0.16 cfs BASIN6-100yr.xls, Tc and PeakQ 7/6/2015, 10:31 AM CALCULATION OF A PEAK RUNOFF USING RATIONAL METHOD Project Title: Sky Hotel Catchment ID: Basin 7 1. Catchment Hydrologic Data Catchment ID = 7 - Area = 0.034 Acres 1 Percent Imperviousness = 82.00 % NRCS Soil Type = B A, B, C, or D ll. Rainfall Information I (inch/hr) = Cl * Pl /(C2 + Td)AC3 Design Storm Return Period, Tr = 10 years (input return period for design storm) Cl = 35.60 (input the value of Cl) 02= 6.60 (input the value of C2) C3= 0.852 (input the value of C3) Pl= 0.47 inches (input one-hr precipitation--see Sheet "Design Info") 111. Analysis of Flow Time (Time of Concentration) for a Catchment Runoff Coefficient, C = 0.65 Overide Runoff Coefficient, C = (enter an overide C value if desired, or leave blank to accept calculated C.) 5-yr. Runoff Coefficient, C-5 = 0.62 Overide 5-yr. Runoff Coefficient, C = Center an overide C-5 value if desired, or leave blank to accept calculated C-5.) Illustration 1 --__--CY--22ALL; c 14 I LEGEND Rewhl J fl,m i (381<,li,idlig Reach 2 ~r --- U. Flm Direction ,Â·U Catchment Â·r Reach 3 Boundar, bi- NRCS Land Heavy Tillage/ Short Nearly Grassed Paved Areas & Type Meadow Field Pasture/ Bare Swales/ Shallow Paved Swales Lawns Ground Waterways (Sheet Flow) Conveyance 2.5 5 7 10 15 20 1 NRCS 1 Flow Flow Calculations: Reach Slope Length 5-yr ID S L Runoff Convey- Velocity Time Coeff ance V Tf fuft ft 0-5 fps minutes input input output input output output j Overland 0.62 N/A 0.00 0.00 1 2 3 4 5 Sum 0 Computed Tc = 0.00 Regional Tc = 10.00 User-Entered Tc = 5.00 IV. Peak Runoff Prediction Rainfall Intensity at Computed Tc, I = inch/hr Peak Flowrate, Qp = efs Rainfall Intensity at Regional Tc, 1 = inch/hr Peak Flowrate, Qp = cfs A Rainfall Intensity at User-Defined Tc, 1 = 2.07 inch/hi Peak Flowrate, Qp = 0.05 ofs -3 BASIN7-10yr.xds, Tc and PeakQ 7/6/2015, 10:31 AM CALCULATION OF A PEAK RUNOFF USING RATIONAL METHOD Project Title: Sky Hotel Catchment ID: Basin 7 1. Catchment Hydrologic Data Catchment ID = 7 Area = 0.034 Acres Percent Imperviousness = 82.00 % NRCS Soil Type = B A, B, C, or D Il. Rainfall Information I (inch/hr) = Cl * Pl /((2 + Toi)AC3 Design Storm Return Period, Tr = 100 years (input return period for design storm) Cl = 35.60 (input the value of Cl) C2= 6.60 (input the value of 02) C3= 0.852 (input the value of 03) Pl= 0.47 inches (input one-hr precipitation--see Sheet "Design Info") 111. Analysis of Flow Time (Time of Concentration) for a Catchment 1 ' Runoff Coefficient, C = 0.72 Overide Runoff Coefficient, C = (enter an overide C value if desired, or leave blank to accept calculated C.) 5-yr. Runoff Coefficient, C-5 = 0.62 Overide 5-yr. Runoff Coefficient, C = (enter an overide C-5 value if desired, or leave blank to accept calculated C-5.) Illustration everland LEGEND * Reach 1 n" r.---, Reach 2 k LJ Begimling Elm' Direction --0/ Catchment / Reach 3 Boundary A- ' NRCS Land Heavy Tillage/ Short Nearly Grassed Paved Areas & Type Meadow Field Pasture/ Bare Swales/ Shallow Paved Swales Lawns Ground Waterways (Sheet Flow) Conveyance 2.5 5 7 10 15 20 Calculations: Reach Slope Length 5-yr NRCS Flow Flow ID S L Runoff Convey- Velocity Time Coeff ance V Tf ft/ft ft C-5 fps minutes input input output input output output Overland 0.62 N/A 0.00 0.00 1 2 3 4 5 Sum 0 Computed Tc = 0.00 Regional Tc = 10.00 User-Entered Tc = 5.00 IV. Peak Runoff Prediction Rainfall Intensity at Computed Tc, 1 = inch/hr Peak Flowrate, Qp = efs Rainfall Intensity at Regional Tc, 1 = inch/hr Peak Flowrate, Qp = cfs Rainfall Intensity at User-Defined Tc, 1 = 2.07 inch/hr Peak Flowrate, Qp = 0.05 cfs BASIN7-100yr.xls, Tc and PeakQ 7/6/2015,10:32 AM CALCULATION OF A PEAK RUNOFF USING RATIONAL METHOD Project Title: Sky Hotel Catchment ID: Basin 8 1. Catchment Hydrologic Data Catchment ID = 8 Area = 0.197 Acres Percent Imperviousness = 88.00 % NRCS Soil Type = B A, B, C, or D Il. Rainfall Information I (inch/hr) = Cl * Pl /((2 + Td)AC3 Design Storm Return Period, Tr = 10 years (input return period for design storm) Cl = 35.60 (input the value of Cl) C2= 6.60 (input the value of C2) 03= 0.852 (input the value of C3) Pl= 0.47 inches (input one-hr precipitation--see Sheet "Design Info") 111. Analysis of Flow Time (Time of Concentration) for a Catchment Runoff Coefficient, C = 0.73 Overide Runoff Coefficient, C = (enter an overide C value if desired, or leave blank to accept calculated C.) 5-yr. Runoff Coefficient, C-5 = 0.70 Overide 5-yr. Runoff Coefficient, C = (enter an overide C-5 value if desired, or leave blank to accept calculated C-5-) Illustration orerland LEGEND /--b~hl flmir - Reach 2 ,Â¥ O Beginning __--CD Fl,nv Direction Catchment / Reach 3 Boundar!, 15 NRCS Land Heavy Tillage/ Short Nearly Grassed Paved Areas & Type Meadow Field Pasture/ Bare Swales/ Shallow Paved Swales Lawns Ground Waterways (Sheet Flow) Conveyance 2.5 5 7 10 15 20 Calculations: ' Reach ~ Slope ~ Length ~ 5-yr NRCS Flow Flow ID S L Runoff Convey- Velocity Time Coeff ance V Tf ft/ft ft C-5 fps minutes input input output input output output Overland 0.70 N/A 0.00 0.00 1 2 3 4 5 Sum 0 Computed Tc = 0.00 Regional Tc = 10.00 User-Entered Tc = 5.00 IV. Peak Runoff Prediction Rainfall Intensity at Computed Tc, 1 = inch/hr Peak Flowrate, Qp = cfs Rainfall Intensity at Regional Tc, 1 = inch/hr Peak Flowrate, Qp = cfs Rainfall Intensity at User-Defined Tc, 1 = 2.07 inch/hr Peak Flowrate, Qp = 0.30 cfs BASIN8-10yr.xls, Tc and PeakQ 7/6/2015. 10:33 AM CALCULATION OF A PEAK RUNOFF USING RATIONAL METHOD Project Title: Sky Hotel Catchment ID: Basin 8 I. Catchment Hydrologic Data Catchment ID = 8 Area = 0.197 Acres Percent Imperviousness = 88.00 % NRCS Soil Type = B A, B, C, or D Il. Rainfall Information I (inch/hr) = Cl * Pl /(C2 + Td)AC3 Design Storm Return Period, Tr = 100 years (input return period for design storm) Cl = 35.60 (input the value of Cl) 02= 6.60 (input the value of C2) C3= 0.852 (input the value of C3) Pl= 0.47 inches (input one-hr precipitation--see Sheet "Design Info") 111. Analysis of Flow Time (Time of Concentration) for a Catchment Runoff Coefficient, C = 0.79 Overide Runoff Coefficient, C = (enter an overide C value if desired, or leave blank to accept calculated C.) 5-yr. Runoff Coefficient, C-5 = 0.70 Overide 5-yr. Runoff Coefficient, C = (enter an overide C-5 value if desired, or leave blank to accept calculated C-5.) Illustration ~ ' ,=1 - -- -- r.4 Ul -< overland LEGEND Rearh l flmv Reach 2 -44 CD Beginiding U Fl-Â· Direaion J / Catchment ' Reach j Bounâ‚¬lan ! NRCS Land Heavy Tillage/ Short Nearly Grassed Paved Areas & Type Meadow Field Pasture/ Bare Swales/ Shallow Paved Swates Lawns Ground Waterways (Sheet Flow) Conveyance 2.5 5 7 10 15 20 Calculations: Reach ' Slope " Length ' 5-yr NRCS 1 Flow Flow ID S L Runoff Convey- Velocity Time Coeff ance V Tf ft/ft ft C-5 fps minutes input input output input output output Overland 0.70 N/A 0.00 0.00 1 1 2 3 1 4 5 Sum 0 Computed Tc = 0.00 Regional Tc = 10.00 User-Entered Tc = 5.00 IV. Peak Runoff Prediction Rainfall Intensity at Computed Tc, 1 = inch/hr Peak Flowrate, Qp = cfs Rainfall Intensity at Regional Tc, 1 = inch/hr Peak Flowrate, Qp = cfs Rainfall Intensity at User-Defined Tc, I = 2.07 inch/hr Peak Flowrate, Qp = 0.32 cfs BASIN8-100yr.xls, Tc and PeakQ 7/6/2015,10:33 AM CALCULATION OF A PEAK RUNOFF USING RATIONAL METHOD Project Title: Sky Hotel Catchment ID: Basin 9A 1. Catchment Hydrologic Data Catchment ID = 9A Area = 0.087 Acres Percent Imperviousness = 90.00 % NRCS Soil Type = B A, B, C, or D 11. Rainfall Information I (inch/hr) = Cl * Pl /(C2 + Td)AC3 Design Storm Return Period, Tr = 10 years (input return period for design storm) Cl = 35.60 (input the value of Cl) C2= 6.60 (input the value of C2) C3= 0.852 (input the value of 03) Pl= 0.47 inches (input one-hr precipitation--see Sheet "Design Info") 111. Analysis of Flow Time (Time of Concentration) for a Catchment Runoff Coefficient, C = 0.75 Overide Runoff Coefficient, C = Center an overide C value if desired, or leave blank to accept calculated C.) 5-yr. Runoff Coefficient, C-5 = 0.73 Overide 5-yr. Runoff Coefficient, C = (enter an overide C-5 value if desired, or leave blank to accept calculated C-5.) Illustration Â«3Â»Â»LEGEND O Begilming JO Flow Direction Catchment r Reach 3 Boundar,~ 9 NRCS Land Heavy Tillage/ Short Nearly Grassed Paved Areas & Type Meadow Field Pasture/ Bare Swates/ Shallow Paved Swales Lawns Ground Waterways (Sheet Flow) Conveyance 2.5 5 7 10 15 20 Calculations: Reach Slope Length 5-yr NRCS Flow Flow ID S L Runoff Convey- Velocity Time Coeff ance V Tf Wit ft C-5 fps minutes input input output input output Output Overland 0.73 N/A 0.00 0.00 1 2 3 4 5 Sum 0 Computed Tc = 0.00 Regional Tc = 10.00 User-Entered Tc = 5.00 IV. Peak Runoff Prediction Rainfall Intensity at Computed Tc, 1 = inch/hr Peak Flowrate, Qp = cfs Rainfall Intensity at Regional Tc, I = inch/hr Peak Flowrate, Qp = cfs Rainfall Intensity at User-Defined Tc, 1 = 2.07 inch/hr Peak Flowrate, Qp = 0.14 efs BASIN9A-loyr.xls, Tc and PeakQ 7/6/2015, 10:33 AM CALCULATION OF A PEAK RUNOFF USING RATIONAL METHOD Project Title: Sky Hotel Catchment ID: Basin 9A 1. Catchment Hydrologic Data Catchment ID = 9A Area = 0.087 Acres i Percent Imperviousness = 90.00 % NRCS Soil Type = B A, B, C, or D ll. Rainfall Information I (inch/hr) = Cl * Pl /((2 + Td)AC3 Design Storm Return Period, Tr = 100 years (input return period for design storm) Cl = 35.60 (input the value of Cl) C2= 6.60 (input the value of C2) C3= 0.852 (input the value of 03) Pl= 0.47 inches (input one-hr precipitation--see Sheet "Design Info") 111. Analysis of Flow Time (Time of Concentration) for a Catchment 1 Runoff Coefficient, C = 0.81 Overide Runoff Coefficient, C = (enter an overide C value if desired, or leave blank to accept calculated C.) 5-yr. Runoff Coefficient, C-5 = 0.73 Overide 5-yr. Runoff Coefficient, C = (enter an overide C-5 value if desired, or leave blank to accept calculated C-5.) Illustration -- -- overland T LEGEND / Reach 1 / Reach 2 ff 10Â»~ Flm; Diiection .-CP Fl- Catch.*ent Boundar,Â· NRCS Land Heavy Tillage/ Short Nearly Grassed Paved Areas & Type Meadow Field Pasture/ Bare Swales/ Shallow Paved Swales Lawns Ground Waterways (Sheet Flow) Conveyance 2.5 5 7 10 15 20 Calculations: Reach Slope Length 5-yr NRCS Flow Flow ID S L Runoff Convey- Velocity Time Coeff ance V Tf ftnt ft C-5 fps minutes input input output input output Output Overland 0.73 N/A 0.00 0.00 1 2 3 4 5 Sum 0 Computed Tc = 0.00 Regional Tc = 10.00 User-Entered Te = 5.00 IV. Peak Runoff Prediction Rainfall Intensity at Computed Tc, 1 inch/hr Peak Flowrate, Qp = cfs 1 Rainfall Intensity at Regional Tc, 1 = inch/hr Peak Flowrate, Qp = cfs Rainfall Intensity at User-Defined Tc, I = 2.07 inch/hr Peak Flowrate, Qp = 0.15 efs BASIN9A-100yr.xls, Tc and PeakQ 7/6/2015, 10:34 AM CALCULATION OF A PEAK RUNOFF USING RATIONAL METHOD Project Title: Sky Hotel Catchment ID: Basin 9B 1. Catchment Hydrologic Data Catchment ID = 9B Area = 0.099 Acres Percent Imperviousness = 84.00 % NRCS Soil Type = B A, B, C, or D Il. Rainfall Information I (inch/hr) = Cl * Pl /(C2 + Td)AC3 Design Storm Return Period, Tr = 10 years (input return period for design storm) Cl = 35.60 (input the value of Cl) C2= 6.60 (input the value of (2) C3= 0.852 (input the value of C3) Pl= 0.47 inches (input one-hr precipitation--see Sheet "Design Info") 111. Analysis of Flow Time (Time of Concentration) for a Catchment ' ' Runoff Coefficient, C = 0.67 Overide Runoff Coefficient, C = (enter an overide C value if desired, or leave blank to accept calculated C.) 5-yr. Runoff Coefficient, C-5 = 0.64 Overide 5-yr. Runoff Coefficient, C = Center an overide C-5 value if desired, or leave blank to accept calculated C-5.) Illustration ----U- orerland LEGEND / Reach 1 ilenv LI~~ Reatif (,2 Beginning Flow Direction 207- 4 3 1 Calchnuant ''-Reach 3 Boundar,Â· NRCS Land Heavy Tillage/ Short Nearly Grassed Paved Areas & Type Meadow Field Pasture/ Bare Swales/ Shallow Paved Swales Lawns Ground Waterways (Sheet Flow) Conveyance 2.5 5 7 10 15 20 Calculations: Reach Slope Length 5-yr NRCS Flow Flow ID S L Runoff Convey- Velocity Time Coeff ance V Tf ft/ft ft 0-5 fps minutes input input output input output output Overland 0.64 N/A 0.00 0.00 1 2 3 4 5 Sum 0 Computed Tc = 0.00 Regional Tc = 10.00 User-Entered Tc = 5.00 IV. Peak Runoff Prediction Rainfall Intensity at Computed Tc, 1 = inch/hr Peak Flowrate, Qp = cfs ' Rainfall Intensity at Regional Tc, 1 = inch/hr Peak Flowrate, Qp = cfs Rainfall Intensity at User-Defined Tc, 1 = 2.07 inch/hr Peak Flowrate, Qp = 0.14 cfs -- BASIN9B-10yr.xls, Tc and PeakQ 7/6/2015: 10:34 AM CALCULATION OF A PEAK RUNOFF USING RATIONAL METHOD Project Title: Sky Hotel Catchment ID: Basin 9B 1. Catchment Hydrologic Data Catchment ID = 9B Area = 0.099 Acres Percent Imperviousness = 84.00 % NRCS Soil Type = B A, B, C, or D [[. Rainfall Information I (inch/hr) = Cl * Pl /((2 + Td)AC3 - Design Storm Return Period, Tr = 100 years (input return period for design storm) Cl = 35.60 (input the value of Cl) C2= 6.60 (input the value of C2) C3= 0.852 (input the value of C3) Pl= 0.47 inches (input one-hr precipitation--see Sheet "Design Info") 111. Analysis of Flow Time (Time of Concentration) for a Catchment Runoff Coefficient, C = 0.74 Overide Runoff Coefficient, C = (enter an overide C value if desired, or leave blank to accept calculated C.) 5-yr. Runoff Coefficient, C-5 = 0.64 Overide 5-yr. Runoff Coefficient, C = (enter an overide C-5 value if desired, or leave blank to accept calculated C-5.) 1 Illustration / It--- -- -=ru overlan d j LEGEND -- <0111 flow i ~ O Begimling /00- Ueackl<* Fl-Â· Direction LReach 3 Catchment Boun(la- Tillage/ Nearly Grassed NRCS Land Heavy Short Paved Areas & Type Meadow Field Pasture/ Bare Swales/ Shallow Paved Swales Lawns Ground Waterways (Sheet Flow) Conveyance 2.5 5 7 10 15 20 Calculations: Reach Slope Length 5-yr NRCS Flow Flow ID S L Runoff Convey- Velocity Time Coeff ance V Tf ft/ft ft C-5 fps minutes input input output input output output Overland 0.64 N/A 0.00 0.00 1 2 3 4 5 Sum 0 Computed Tc = 0.00 Regional Tc = 10.00 User-Entered Tc = 5.00 IV. Peak Runoff Prediction Rainfall Intensity at Computed Tc, I = inch/hr Peak Flowrate, Qp = cfs Rainfall Intensity at Regional Tc, 1 = inch/hr Peak Flowrate, Qp = cfs Peak Flowrate, Qp = 0.15 ofs Rainfall Intensity at User-Defined Tc, I = 2.07 inch/hr BASIN9B-100yr.xls, Tc and PeakQ 7/6/2015, 10:35 AM CALCULATION OF A PEAK RUNOFF USING RATIONAL METHOD Project Title: Sky Hotel Catchment ID: Basin 10 1. Catchment Hydrologic Data Catchment ID = 10 Area = 0.077 Acres Percent Imperviousness = 89.00 % NRCS Soil Type = B A, B, C, or D Il. Rainfall Information I (inch/hr) = Cl * Pl /((2 + Td)AC3 Design Storm Return Period, Tr = 10 years (input return period for design storm) Cl = 35.60 (input the value of Cl) C2= 6.60 (input the value of C2) i C3= 0.852 (input the value of 03) Pl= 0.47 inches (input one-hr precipitation--see Sheet "Design Info") Ill. Analysis of Flow Time (Time of Concentration) for a Catchment ' Runoff Coefficient, C = 0.74 Overide Runoff Coefficient, C = (enter an overide C value if desired, or leave blank to accept calculated C.) 5-yr. Runoff Coefficient, C-5 = 0.71 Overide 5-yr. Runoff Coefficient, C = (enter an overide C-5 value if desired, or leave blank to accept calculated C-5.) Illustration ozerland j~ LEGEND F- Reach 1 fle / n Reach 2 + U Beginning UJ FlonÂ· Dimaion tf- Catchment Boundary &5- NRCS Land Heavy Tjilage/ Short Nearly Grassed Paved Areas & Type Meadow Field Pasture/ Bare Swales/ Shallow Paved Swales Lawns Ground Waterways (Sheet Flow) Conveyance 2.5 5 7 10 15 20 Calculations: Reach Slope Length 5-yr NRCS Flow Flow ID S L Runoff Convey- Velocity Time Coeff ance V Tf ft/ft ft C-5 fps minutes input input output input output output Overland 0.71 N/A 0.00 0.00 1 2 3 4 5 Sum 0 Computed Tc = 0.00 Regional Tc = 10.00 4 User-Entered Tc = 5.00 IV. Peak Runoff Prediction Rainfall Intensity at Computed Tc, 1 = inch/hr Peak Flowrate, Qp = cfs Rainfall Intensity at Regional Tc, 1 = inch/hr Peak Flowrate, Qp = cfs 4 Rainfall Intensity at User-Defined Tc, 1 = 2.07 inch/hr Peak Flowrate, Qp = 0.12 cfs BASIN10-10yr.xls, Tc and PeakQ 7/6/2015, 10:35 AM CALCULATION OF A PEAK RUNOFF USING RATIONAL METHOD Project Title: Sky Hotel Catchment ID: Basin 10 1. Catchment Hydrologic Data Catchment ID = 10 Area = 0.077 Acres Percent Imperviousness = 89.00 % NRCS Soil Type = B A, B, C,or D Il. Rainfall Information I (inch/hr) = Cl * Pl /(C2 + Td)AC3 Design Storm Return Period, Tr = 100 years (input return period for design storm) Cl = 35.60 (input the value of Cl) C2= 6.60 (input the value of 02) C3= 0.852 (input the value of C3) A Pl= 0.47 inches (input one-hr precipitation--see Sheet "Design Info") 111. Analysis of Flow Time (Time of Concentration) for a Catchment Runoff Coefficient, C = 0.80 Overide Runoff Coefficient, C = (enter an overide C value if desired, or leave blank to accept calculated C.) 5-yr. Runoff Coefficient, C-5 = 0.71 Overide 5-yr. Runoff Coefficient, C = (enter an overide C-5 value if desired, or leave blank to accept calculated C-5.) Illustration .,/---'---55f--~~--m,erlm-* LEGEND / Reach 1 flm,p I ~ O Beginning t ./y- -:3==333"~tiOn 1 - Catchment Â£21-Reach 3 Boundary NRCS Land Heavy Tillage/ Short Nearly Grassed Paved Areas & w Type Meadow Field Pastu re/ Bare Swales/ Shallow Paved Swales Lawns Ground Waterways (Sheet Flow) Conveyance 2.5 5 7 10 15 20 Calculations: Reach ~ Slope ~ Length 5-yr NHCS Flow Flow ' ID S L Runoff Convey- Velocity Time Coeff ance V Tf ft/ft ft C-5 fps minutes input input output input output output Overland 0.71 N/A 0.00 0.00 1 2 1 3 1 4 5 Sum 0 Computed Tc = 0.00 Regional Tc = 10.00 User-Entered Tc = 5.00 IV. Peak Runoff Prediction Rainfall Intensity at Computed Tc, I = inch/hr Peak Flowrate, Qp = cfs Rainfall Intensity at Regional Tc, 1 = inch/hr Peak Flowrate, Qp = cfs Rainfall Intensity at User-Defined Tc, 1 = 2.07 inch/hr Peak Flowrate, Qp = 0.13 cfs BASIN10-100yr.xls, Tc and PeakQ 7/6/2015, 10:36 AM CALCULATION OF A PEAK RUNOFF USING RATIONAL METHOD Project Title: Sky Hotel Catchment ID: Basin 11 1. Catchment Hydrologic Data Catchment ID = 11 Area = 0.072 Acres Percent Imperviousness = 85.00 % NRCS Soil Type = BA,B,C,orD Il. Rainfall Information I (inch/hr) = Cl * Pl /((2 + Td)AC3 Design Storm Return Period, Tr = 10 years (input return period for design storm) Cl = 35.60 (input the value of Cl) C2= 6.60 (input the value of C2) 03= 0.852 (input the value of C3) Pl= 0.47 inches (input one-hr precipitation-see Sheet "Design Info") Ill. Analysis of Flow Time (Time of Concentration) for a Catchment Runoff Coefficient, C = 0.69 Overide Runoff Coefficient, C = Center an overide C value if desired, or leave blank to accept calculated C.) 5-yr. Runoff Coefficient, C-5 = 0.66 Overide 5-yr. Runoff Coefficient, C = (enter an overide C-5 value if desired, or leave blank to accept calculated C-5.) Illustration overhmA # LEGEND 1 Rearh 1 flav C Beginning Reach 2 Y 30 Flmy Dimction & Cateba.ent = Reach 3 Boundary NRCS Land Heavy Tillage/ Short Nearly Grassed Paved Areas & Type Meadow Field Pasture/ Bare Swales/ Shallow Paved Swales Lawns Ground Waterways (Sheet Flow) Conveyance 2.5 5 7 10 15 20 Calculations: Reach ~ Slope ' Length ' 5-yr NRCS Flow Flow ' ID S L Runoff Convey- Velocity Time Coe# ance V Tf ft/ft ft C-5 fps minutes input input output input output output Overland 0.66 N/A 0.00 0.00 1 2 i 3 4 5 Sum 0 Computed Tc 2 0.00 t Regional Tc = 10.00 User-Entered Tc = 5.00 IV. Peak Runoff Prediction Rainfall Intensity at Computed Tc, 1 = inch/hr Peak Flowrate, Qp = cfs Rainfall Intensity at Regional Tc, 1 = inch/hr Peak Flowrate, Qp = cfs , Rainfall Intensity at User-Defined Tc, 1 = 2.07 inch/hr Peak Flowrate, Qp = 0.10 cfs -4 BASIN11-10yr.xls, Tc and PeakQ 7/6/2015,10:36 AM CALCULATION OF A PEAK RUNOFF USING RATIONAL METHOD Project Title: Sky Hotel Catchment ID: Basin 11 1. Catchment Hydrologic Data Catchment ID = 11 Area = 0.072 Acres 1 Percent Imperviousness = 85.00 % NRCS Soil Type = B A, B, C, or D ll. Rainfall Information I (inch/hr) = Cl * Pl /((2 + Td)AC3 Design Storm Return Period, Tr = 100 years (input return period for design storm) Cl = 35.60 (input the value of Cl) C2= 6.60 (input the value of C2) 03= 0.852 (input the value of C3) Pl= 0.47 inches (input one-hr precipitation--see Sheet "Design Info") Ill. Analysis of Flow Time (Time of Concentration) for a Catchment Runoff Coefficient, C = 0.75 Overide Runoff Coefficient, C = (enter an overide C value if desired, or leave blank to accept calculated C.) 5-yr. Runoff Coefficient, C-5 = 0.66 Overide 5-yr. Runoff Coefficient, C = (enter an overide C-5 value if desired, or leave blank to accept calculated C-5.) Illustration overland LEGEND Reach 1 flmv Reach 2 ~* O BeÂ¢Â£ming 1-J Flmv Direction Catchment / Reach 3 Boundar,Â· '12.- NRCS Land Heavy Tillage/ Short Nearly Grassed Paved Areas & Type Meadow Field Pasture/ Bare Swales/ Shallow Paved Swales Lawns Ground Waterways (Sheet Flow) Conveyance 2.5 5 7 10 15 20 Calculations: Reach Slope Length 5-yr NRCS Flow Flow - ID S L Runoff Convey- Velocity Time Coeff ance V Tf ft/ft ft C-5 fps minutes input input output input output output Overland 0.66 N/A 0.00 0.00 1 2 3 4 5 Sum 0 Computed Tc = 0.00 0 Regional Tc = 10.00 User-Entered Tc = 5.00 IV. Peak Runoff Prediction Rainfall Intensity at Computed Tc, 1 = inch/hr Peak Flowrate, Qp = cfs Rainfall Intensity at Regional Tc, I = inch/hr Peak Flowrate, Qp = cfs Rainfall Intensity at User-Defined Tc, 1 = 2.07 inch/hr Peak Flowrate, Qp = 0.11 cfs BASIN11 -100yr.xls, Tc and PeakQ 7/6/2015, 10:36 AM CALCULATION OF A PEAK RUNOFF USING RATIONAL METHOD - Sky Hotel Project Title: Catchment ID: Basin 12 1. Catchment Hydrologic Data Catchment ID = 12 Area = 0.003 Acres J Percent Imperviousness = 100.00 % NRCS Soil Type = B A, B, C, or D l[. Rainfall Information I (inch/hr) = Cl * Pl /((2 + Td)AC3 - - Design Storm Return Period, Tr = 10 years (input return period for design storm) Cl = 35.60 (input the value of Cl) 02= 6.60 (input the value of C2) C3= 0.852 (input the value of C3) Pl= 0.47 inches (input one-hr precipitation--see Sheet "Design Info") 111. Analysis of Flow Time (Time of Concentration) for a Catchment Runoff Coefficient, C = 0.92 Overide Runoff Coefficient, C = (enter an overide C value if desired, or leave blank to accept calculated C.) 5-yr. Runoff Coefficient, C-5 = 0.90 Overide 5-yr. Runoff Coefficient, C = (enter an overide C-5 value if desired, or leave blank to accept calculated C-5.) illustration ,_1~.------Â«h overland ~ LEGEND / Reach 1 flmy 1 / O Beginning Reach 2 ~-Â¢ Flav Direition A 4. i Catchment 4 Reach 3 Boundar,Â· Af NRCS Land Heavy Tillage/ Short Nearly Grassed Paved Areas & Type Meadow Field Pasture/ Bare Swales/ Shallow Paved Swales Lawns Ground Waterways (Sheet Flow) Conveyance 2.5 5 7 10 15 20 Calculations: Reach Slope Length 5-yr NRCS Flow Flow ID S L Runoff Convey- Velocity Time Coeff ance V Tf i fUn ft C-5 fps minutes input input output input output output Overland 0.90 N/A 0.00 0.00 1 2 1 3 4 5 Sum 0 Computed Tc = 0.00 Regional Tc = 10.00 User-Entered Tc = 5.00 IV. Peak Runoff Prediction Rainfall Intensity at Computed Tc, I = inch/hr Peak Flowrate, Qp = cfs Rainfall Intensity at Regional Tc, 1 = inch/hr Peak Flowrate, Qp = cfs Rainfall Intensity at User-Defined Tc, 1 = 2.07 inch/hr Peak Flowrate, Qp = 0.01 cfs BASIN12-10yr.xls, Tc and PeakQ 7/6/2015,10:37 AM CALCULATION OF A PEAK RUNOFF USING RATIONAL METHOD Project Title: Sky Hotel Catchment ID: Basin 12 1. Catchment Hydrologic Data Catchment ID = 12 Area = 0.003 Acres Percent Imperviousr'less = 100.00 % NRCS Soil Type = B A, B, C, or D ll. Rainfall Information I (inch/hr) = Cl * Pl /(C2 + Td)AC3 Design Storm Return Period, Tr = 100 years (input return period for design storm) Cl = 35.60 (input the value of Cl) C2= 6.60 (input the value of C2) C3= 0.852 (input the value of C3) & l 0.47 inches (input one-hr precipitation--see Sheet "Design Info") 111. Analysis of Flow Time (Time of Concentration) for a Catchment Runoff Coefficient, C = 0.96 Overide Runoff Coefficient, C fenter an overide C value if desired, or leave blank to accept calculated C.) 5-yr. Runoff Coefficient, C-5 = 0.90 Overide 5-yr. Runoff Coefficient, C = (enter an overide C-5 value if desired, or leave blank to accept calculated C-5.) Illustration overland ~ LEGEND e Reah l flmv ] / Â© Be:,11,91.1,2 Reach ~~f Flcw Direction 1 ---0 +---- 1 / Catchment -Reach 3 Boundar, NRCS Land Heavy Tillage/ Short Nearly Grassed Paved Areas & Type Meadow Field Pasture/ Bare Swales/ Shallow Paved Swales Lawns Ground Waterways (Sheet Flow) Conveyance 2.5 5 7 10 15 20 Calculations: Reach Slope Length 5-yr NRCS Flow Flow ' ID S L Runoff Convey- Velocity Time Coeff ance V Tf ft/ft ft C-5 fps minutes input input output input output output Overland 0.90 N/A 0.00 0.00 1 2 3 4 5 Sum 0 Computed Tc = 0.00 Regional Tc = 10.00 User-Entered Tc = 5.00 IV. Peak Runoff Prediction Rainfall Intensity at Computed Tc, 1 = inch/hr Peak Flowrate, Qp = efs Rainfall Intensity at Regional Tc, I = inch/hr Peak Flowrate, Qp = cfs Rainfall Intensity at User-Defined Tc, 1 - 2.07 inch/hr Peak Flowrate, Qp = 0.01 cfs BASIN12-100yr.xls, Tc and PeakQ 7/6/2015,10:37 AM CALCULATION OF A PEAK RUNOFF USING RATIONAL METHOD Project Title: Sky Hotel Catchment ID: Basin 13 1. Catchment Hydrologic Data Catchment ID = 13 Area = 0.001 Acres Percent Imperviousness = 50.00 % NRCS Soil Type = B A, B, C, or D Il. Rainfall Information I (inch/hr) = Cl * Pl /((2 + Td)\(3 Design Storm Return Period, Tr = 10 years (input return period for design storm) Cl = 35.60 (input the value of Cl) C2= 6.60 (input the value of C2) C3= 0.852 (input the value of C3) Pl= 0.47 inches (input one-hr precipitation--see Sheet "Design Info") Ill. Analysis of Flow Time Crime of Concentration) for a Catchment Runoff Coefficient, C = 0.40 Overide Runoff Coefficient, C = Center an overide C value if desired, or leave blank to accept calculated C.) 5-yr. Runoff Coefficient, C-5 = 0.35 Overide 5-yr. Runoff Coefficient, C = (enter an overide C-5 value if desired, or leave blank to accept calculated C-5.) Illustration W. __ty-----n V ---- merland $ LEGEND '/ Reach 1 fl,m 1- i -< (23 Beginning i/*~ Reach 2 ~ / -/0' Flew Direr.tion /-tur Catchment /Reach 3 Boundaer ' NRCS Land Heavy Tillage/ Short Nearly Grassed Paved Areas & Type Meadow Field Pasture/ Bare Swales/ Shallow Paved Swales Lawns Ground Waterways (Sheet Flow) Conveyance 2.5 5 7 10 15 20 Calculations: Reach Slope Length 5-yr NRCS Flow Flow , ID S L Runoff Convey- Velocity Time Coeff ance V Tf ft/ft ft C-5 fps minutes input input output input output output Overland 0.35 N/A 0.00 0.00 1 2 3 4 5 Sum 0 Computed Tc = 0.00 Regional Tc = 10.00 User-Entered Tc = 5.00 IV. Peak Runoff Prediction Rainfall Intensity at Computed Tc, 1 = inch/hr Peak Flowrate, Qp = cfs Rainfall Intensity at Regional Tc, 1 = inch/hr Peak Flowrate, Qp = cfs Rainfall Intensity at User-Defined Tc, 1 = 2.07 inch/hr Peak Flowrate, Qp = 0.00 efs BASIN13-10yr.xls, Tc and PeakQ 7/6/2015,10:38 AM CALCULATION OF A PEAK RUNOFF USING RATIONAL METHOD Project Title: Sky Hotel Catchment ID: Basin 13 1. Catchment Hydrologic Data Catchment ID = 13 Area = 0.001 Acres Percent Imperviousness = 50.00 % NRCS Soil Type = B A, B, C, or D ll. Rainfall Information I (inch/hr) = Cl * Pl /((2 + Td)AC3 Design Storm Return Period, Tr = 100 years (input return period for design storm) Cl = 35.60 (input the value of Cl) C2= 6.60 (input the value of C2) C3= 0.852 (input the value of C3) Pl= 0.47 inches (input one-hr precipitation--see Sheet "Design Info") Ill. Analysis of Flow Time (Time of Concentration) for a Catchment Runoff Coefficient, C = 0.52 Overide Runoff Coefficient, C = fenter an overide C value if desired, or leave blank to accept calculated C.) 5-yr. Runoff Coefficient, C-5 = 0.35 Overide 5-yr. Runoff Coefficient, C = (enter an overide C-5 value if desired, or leave blank to accept calculated C-5.) Illustration 0~Iland ~ LEGEND Reach l flmv f 0 n.o~,rat Reach 2 A- _-0 Flow Direction Catchment / Reach 3 Boundary NRCS Land Heavy Tillage/ Short Nearly Grassed Paved Areas & Type Meadow Field Pasture/ Bare Swales/ Shallow Paved Swales Lawns Ground Waterways (Sheet Flow) Conveyance 2.5 5 7 10 15 20 Caiculations: Reach Slope Length 5-yr NRCS Flow Flow i_.1 ID S L Runoff Convey- Velocity Time Coeff ance V Tf ft/ft ft C-5 fps minutes input jnput output input output output Overland 0.35 N/A 0.00 0.00 1 2 3 4 5 Sum 0 Computed Tc = 0.00 Regional Tc = 10.00 User-Entered Tc = 5.00 IV. Peak Runoff Prediction Rainfall Intensity at Computed Tc, 1 = inch/hr Peak Flowrate, Qp = cfs Rainfall Intensity at Regional Tc, 1 = inch/hr Peak Flowrate, Qp = cfs Rainfall Intensity at User-Defined Tc, 1 = 2.07 inch/hr Peak Flowrate, Qp = 0.00 cfs BASIN13-100yr.xls, Tc and PeakQ 7/6/2015, 10:38 AM CALCULATION OF A PEAK RUNOFF USING RATIONAL METHOD 1, Project Title: Sky Hotel Catchment ID: Basin 14 1. Catchment Hydrologic Data Catchment ID = 14 Area = 0.026 Acres Percent Imperviousness = 82.00 % NRCS Soil Type = B A, B, C, or D ll. Rainfall Information I (inch/hr) = Cl * Pl /((2 + Td)'(3 Design Storm Return Period, Tr = 10 years (input return period for design storm) Cl = 35.60 (input the value of Cl) 02= 6.60 (input the value of C2) C3= 0.852 (input the value of C3) Pl= 0.47 inches (input one-hr precipitation--see Sheet "Design Info") 111. Analysis of Flow Time (Time of Concentration) for a Catchment Runoff Coefficient, C = 0.65 Overide Runoff Coefficient, C = (enter an overide C value if desired, or leave blank to accept calculated C.) 5-yr. Runoff Coefficient, C-5 = 0.62 Overide 5-yr. Runoff Coefficient, C = (enter an overide C-5 value if desired, or leave blank to accept calculated C-5.) Illustration overland 1 LEGEND /--11 01-7 23*EZZR le=Ud / Â»47- -- 4- 1 1/ Catch:rnent E Reach 3 Boundar}' NRCS Land Heavy Tillage/ Short Nearly Grassed Paved Areas & Type Meadow Field Pasture/ Bare Swales/ Shallow Paved Swales Lawns Ground Waterways (Sheet Flow) Conveyance 2.5 5 7 10 15 20 i Calculations: Reach Slope Length 5-yr NRCS I Flow Flow ID S L Runoff Convey- Velocity Time Coeff ance V 11 ft/ft ft C-5 fps minutes input input output input output output Overland 0.62 N/A 0.00 0.00 1 2 --- 3 4 5 Sum 0 Computed Tc = 0.00 Regional Tc = 10.00 ~ 1 User-Entered Tc = 5.00 IV. Peak Runoff Prediction Rainfall Intensity at Computed Tc, 1 = inch/hr Peak Flowrate, Qp = cfs Rainfall Intensity at Regional Tc, 1 = inch/hr Peak Flowrate, Qp = cfs Rainfall Intensity at User-Defined Tc, 1 = 2.07 inch/hr Peak Flowrate, Qp = 0.04 cfs BASIN14-10yr.xls, Tc and PeakQ 7/6/2015,10:38 AM CALCULATION OF A PEAK RUNOFF USING RATIONAL METHOD Project Title: Sky Hotel Catchment ID: Basin 14 1. Catchment Hydrologic Data Catchment ID = 14 Area = 0.026 Acres Percent Imperviousness = 82.00 % NRCS Soil Type = B A, B, C, or D Il. Rainfall Information I (inch/hr) = Cl * Pl 1((32 + Td)AC3 Design Storm Return Period, Tr = 100 years (input return period for design storm) Cl = 35.60 (input the value of Cl) C2= 6.60 (input the value of C2) C3= 0.852 (input the value of C3) Pl= 0.47 inches (input one-hr precipitation--see Sheet "Design Info") 111. Analysis of Flow Time (Time of Concentration) for a Catchment Runoff Coefficient, C = 0.72 Overide Runoff Coefficient, C = Center an overide C value if desired, or leave blank to accept calculated C.) 5-yr. Runoff Coefficient, C-5 = 0.62 Overide 5-yr. Runoff Coefficient, C = (enter an overide C-5 value if desired, or leave blank to accept calculated C-5.) Illustration overland LEGEND f ReMbl fle i- Reach 2 j; O Begim:ing Flmv Dimction //or- - i #/ Catch:nient / Reach 3 Boundary NRCS Land Heavy Tillage/ Short Nearly Grassed Paved Areas & Type Meadow Field Pasture/ Bare Swales/ Shallow Paved Swales Lawns Ground Waterways (Sheet Flow) Conveyance 2.5 5 7 10 15 20 Calculations: Reach Slope Length 5-yr NRCS Flow Flow ' ID S L Runoff Convey- Velocity Time Coeff ance V Tf fun ft C-5 fps minutes input input output input output output Overland 0.62 N/A 0.00 0.00 1 2 3 4 5 Sum 0 Computed Tc = 000 Regional Tc = 10.00 1 User-Entered Tc = 5.00 IV. Peak Runoff Prediction Rainfall Intensity at Computed Tc, 1 = inch/hr Peak Flowrate, Qp = cfs Rainfall Intensity at Regional Tc, 1 = inch/hr Peak Flowrate, Qp = cfs i i Rainfall Intensity at User-Defined Tc, 1 = 2.07 inch/hr Peak Flowrate, Qp = 0.04 cfs BASIN14-100yr.xls, Tc and PeakQ 7/6/2015, 10:39 AM CALCULATION OF A PEAK RUNOFF USING RATIONAL METHOD Project Title: Sky Hotel Catchment ID: Basin 15 1. Catchment Hydrologic Data Catchment ID = 15 Area = 0.048 Acres Percent Imperviousness = 78.00 % NRCS Soil Type = B A, B, C, or D Il. Rainfall Information I (inch/hr) = Cl * Pl /((2 + Td)AC3 Design Storm Return Period, Tr = 10 years (input return period for design storm) Cl = 35.60 (input the value of Cl) C2= 6.60 (input the value of C2) C3= 0.852 (input the value of C3) Pl= 0.47 inches (input one-hr precipitation--see Sheet "Design Info") Ill. Analysis of Flow Time (Time of Concentration) for a Catchment Runoff Coefficient, C = 0.61 Overide Runoff Coefficient, C = (enter an overide C value if desired, or leave blank to accept calculated C.) 5-yr. Runoff Coefficent, C-5 0.57 Overide 5-yr. Runoff Coefficient, C = (enter an overide C-5 value if desired, or leave blank to accept calculated C-5.) Illustration overland I LEGEND ~/~--721rh 1 11,m Reach 2 -4 O Regmning ----0 Flmir Direction Catchnkent k Reach 3 Boundar, ' NRCS Land Heavy Tillage/ Short Nearly Grassed Paved Areas & Type Meadow Field Pasture/ Bare Swales/ Shallow Paved Swales Lawns Ground Waterways (Sheet Flow) Conveyance 2.5 5 7 10 15 20 Calculations: Reach ' Slope ' Length 5-yr NRCS Flow Flow ' ID S L Runoff Convey- Velocity Time Coeff ance V Tf ft/ft ft C-5 fps minutes input input output input output output Overland 0.57 N/A 0.00 0.00 1 2 3 4 5 Sum 0 Computed Tc = 0.00 Regional Tc = 10.00 User-Entered Tc = 5.00 IV. Peak Runoff Prediction Rainfall Intensity at Computed Tc, 1 = inch/hr Peak Flowrate, Op = efs Rainfall Intensity at Regional Tc, 1 = inch/hr Peak Flowrate, Qp = cfs Rainfall Intensity at User-Defined Tc, 1 = 2.07 i ich/hr Peak Flowrate, Qp = 0.06 cfs BASIN15-10yr.xls: Tc and PeakQ 7/6/2015, 10:39 AM CALCULATION OF A PEAK RUNOFF USING RATIONAL METHOD Project Title: Sky Hotel Catchment ID: Basin 15 1. Catchment Hydrologic Data Catchment ID = 15 Area = 0.048 Acres Percent Imperviousness = 78.00 % NRCS Soil Type = B A, B, G, or D Il. Rainfall Information I (inch/hr) = Cl * Pl /(C2 + Td)~C3 Design Storm Return Period, Tr = 100 years (input return period for design storm) Cl = 35.60 (input the value of Cl) 02= 6.60 (input the value of C2) C3= 0.852 (input the value of C3) Pl= 0.47 iaches (input one-hr precipitation--see Sheet "Design Info") 111. Analysis of Flow Time (Time of Concentration) for a Catchment Runoff Coefficient, C = 0.68 Overide Runoff Coefficient, C = (enter an overide C value if desired, or leave blank to accept calculated C.) 5-yr. Runoff Coefficient, C-5 = 0.57 Overide 5-yr. Runoff Coefficient: C = (enter an overide C-5 value if desired, or leave blank to accept calculated C-5.) Illustration overland < LEGEND Rearh I flmv f - Reach Z ,4 1 0 Beginning FlÂ£,w Dinxtion ' Catchment C Reach 3 Boundary NRCS Land Heavy Tillage/ Short Nearly Grassed Paved Areas & Type Meadow Field Pasture/ Bare Swales/ Shallow Paved Swales Lawns Ground Waterways (Sheet Flow) Conveyance 2.5 5 7 10 15 20 Calculations: Reach Slope ' Length 5-yr NRCS Flow Flow ' IDS L Runoff Convey- Velocity Time CoeM ance V Tf ft/ft ft C-5 fps minutes input input output input output output Overland 0.57 N/A 0.00 0.00 1 2 1 3 4 5 Sum 0 Computed Tc = 0.00 Regional Tc = 10.00 User-Entered Tc = 5.00 IV. Peak Runoff Prediction Rainfall Intensity at Computed Tc, I = inch/hr Peak Flowrate, Qp = cfs Rainfall Intensity at Regional Tc, 1 = inch/hr Peak Flowrate, Qp = cfs Rainfall Intensity at User-Defined Tc, 1 = 2.07 inch/hr Peak Flowrate, Qp = 0.07 cfs BASIN15-100yr.xls, Tc and PeakQ 7/6/2015, 10:40 AM CALCULATION OF A PEAK RUNOFF USING RATIONAL METHOD Project Title: Sky Hotel Catchment ID: Basin 1 1. Catchment Hydrologic Data Catchment ID = 1 Area = 0.033 Acres Percent Imperviousness = 50.00 % NRCS Soil Type = B A, B, C, or D Il. Rainfall Information I (inch/hr) = Cl * Pl /((2 + Td)AC3 Design Storm Return Period, Tr = 10 years (input return period for design storm) Cl = 35.60 (input the value of Cl) C2= 6.60 (input the value of C2) C3= 0.852 (input the value of (3) Pl= 0.47 inches (input one-hr precipitation--see Sheet "Design Into") Ill. Analysis of Flow Time (Time of Concentration) for a Catchment 1 Runoff Coefficient, C = 0.40 Overide Runoff Coefficient, C = (enter an overide C value if desired, or leave blank to accept calculated C.) 5-yr. Runoff Coefficient, C-5 = 0.35 Overide 5-yr. Runoff Coefficient, C = (enter an overide C-5 value if desired, or leave blank to accept calculated C-5.) Illustration r----<Ck -o~er~nd ~ LEGEND / Reach l flmv ....h. L.J Beginning Fl,mÂ· Dilir,ion f Catch,nent Reach 3 Boundar,r NRCS Land Heavy Tillage/ Short Nearly Grassed Paved Areas & Type Meadow Field Pasture/ Bare Swales/ Shallow Paved Swales Lawns Ground Waterways (Sheet Flow) Conveyance 2.5 5 7 10 15 20 Calculations: Reach I Slope Â· Length 5-yr NRCS Flow Flow ' ID S L Runoff Convey- Velocity Time Coeff ance V 11 ft/ft ft C-5 fps minutes input input output input output output ' Overland 0.35 N/A 0.00 0.00 1 2 3 4 5 Sum 0 Computed Tc = 0.00 Regional Tc = 10.00 User-Entered Tc = 5.00 [V. Peak Runoff Prediction Rainfall Intensity at Computed Tc, 1 = inch/hr Peak Flowrate, Qp = cfs Rainfall Intensity at Regional Tc, 1 = inch/hr Peak Flowrate, Qp = cfs Rainfall Intensity at User-Defined Tc, 1 = 2.07 inch/hr Peak Flowrate, Qp = 0.03 efs BASIN1-10yr.xls, Tc and PeakQ 7/6/2015, 10:17 AM ATTACHMENT F SKY HOTEL MUDFLOWANALYSIS Sky Hotel Mudflow Analysis Prepared for: Sarpa Development 300 S. Spring Street Aspen, Colorado 81611 Prepared by: ~| TETRATECH Tetra Tech P.O. Box 1659 130 Ski Hill Road, Suite 140 Breckenridge, Colorado 80424 June 25, 2015 Sky Hotel Mudflow Analysis June 25, 2015 TABLE OF CONTENTS 1 INTRODUCTION 1 2 MUDFLOW MODELING 1 2.1 Mudflow Characterization and Processes......................................................................... 3 3 FLO-2D Modeling 6 3.1 City of Aspen Official FLO-2D Model 3.2 Duplicate Model 6 3.3 Existing Conditions Model ..7 3.3.1 Clearwater Hydrographs . 7 3.3.2 Mudflow Hydrographs 3.3.3 Other Input Data Files 10 3.3.4 Existing Conditions Model Results 10 3.4 Project Conditions Morial 13 3.4.1 Project Conditions Model Results .13 4 RECOMMENDATIONS 16 5 SUMMARY AND CONCLUSIONS. 16 6 REFERENCE 17 ATTACHMENT 1: Annotated Site Plan ATTACHMENT 2: FLO-2D Model Files (Disc) (under separate cover) i Sky Hotel Mudflow Analysis June 25, 2015 LIST OF FIGURES Figure 1. Vicinity map. 2 Figure 2. Location of the project in relation to the City of Aspen Mudflow Zones................ 2 Figure 3. Classification of hyperconcentrated sediment flows (modified from FLO-2D Manual, 2013) 5 Figure 4. Predicted maximum mudflow depth for the 100-year peak flow event. Figure ES-7 from the City of Aspen Drainage Master Plan (2001)................................. 7 Figure 5. Typical sediment concentration hydrographs...................................................... 9 Figure 6. Existing conditions mudflow contours 12 Figure 7. Predicted mudflows depth and design depths under project conditions in the vicinity of the Sky Hotel. ______--------â€ž------...14 Figure 8. Difference in maximum mud depth between project and existing conditions inthe vicinity of the Sky Hotel............................................................................15 LIST OF TABLES Table 1. Mudflow Behavior as a Function of Sediment Concentration (FLO-2D manual, 2013). 3 Table 2. Comparison of the predicted peak flows for the 100-year, 2-hour rainfall event for the Drainage Master Plan and CHUP Version 1.4.4............................. 8 Table 3. FLO-2D Input Parameters used in the Existing and Project conditions models..............................................................................--.-Â·-Â·Â·Â·Â·Â·Â·Â·Â·Â·Â·Â·Â·Â·Â·Â·Â·Â·Â·Â·Â·Â·Â·Â·Â·-Â·Â·11 ii Sky Hotel Mudflow Analysis June 25, 2015 1 INTRODUCTION This report summarizes the procedures and results of the mudflow analysis prepared for the Sky Hotel, located at 709 East Durant Street in Aspen, Colorado (Figure 1). The proposed project includes a major renovation of the existing structure which will add additional lodging and affordable housing units. The proposed building footprint will be similar to the existing hotel with the exception of one small triangular shaped addition on the southwest corner of the building, and a slightly wider structure along the north-south leg of the building. The site plan was provided by Rowland + Broughton. A copy of the proposed site plan is included as Attachment A, annotated with the existing building footprint superimposed to show the minor footprint changes. Two-dimensional (FLO-2D) mudflow modeling was conducted to: (1) determine the impacts of the proposed development on mudflow depths at offsite properties and (2) estimate the mudflow depths within the proposed development. The FLO-2D Pro model and output (FLO-2D) was used to develop mitigation recommendations for the project. 2 MUDFLOW MODELING The City of Aspen Mudflow Regulations apply to all new development and re-development projects within the blue or yellow mudflow zones, as shown on Figure 7.1, Chapter 7-Mudflow Analysis, of the City's Urban Runoff Management Plan, dated April 2010 (Mudflow Regulations). The proposed project is located within yellow and blue zones, and therefore, a mudflow analysis is required to demonstrate that the project does not increase mudflow depths on down-fan properties (Figure 2) (Note: Figure 2 is not to scale, nor intended to be used for analysis and modeling). The following steps for analysis recommended in the City's Mudflow Regulations are: 1. Create a duplicate of the City of Aspen's official FLO-2D mudflow model and run the model over the 100-year, 2-hour rainfall hydrograph. This model is referred to as the Duplicate model. 2. Compare the predided mudflow depths from the Duplicate model with the depths shown in the City's 2001 Drainage Master Plan to demonstrate compatibility and consistency between the models. 3. The City's official FLO-2D mudflow model has a grid comprised of elements of 100-feet in size; this grid is considered too coarse to properly assess changes in building footprints. The City supports Tetra Tech's recommendation of developing a new model with 25-foot elements to represent the site-specific existing conditions. This model is referred to as the existing conditions model. 4. Modify the existing conditions model to reflect the project conditions and run the model over the 100-year, 2-hour rainfall hydrograph. This model is referred to as the Project Conditions model. 5. Compare the differences in mud surface elevations predicted by the existing and project conditions models to evaluate down-fan impacts. If necessary, develop recommendations to mitigate offsite impacts insuring project conditions do not exceed existing conditions on down- fan properties. 6. Determine the mud depths at the proposed buildings and develop recommendations for mudflow impact and loading forces for structural design. Provide grading recommendations where beneficial for reducing mudflow impacts. 1 Sky Hotel Mudflow Analysis June 25, 2015 2-- - 4% Off - r 1~ = Â¤4 1 1 5 f , = 4 ' ' 1â€¢U;, * CD K ,; I 1 <C W SMUGGLER ST PO $ E W . 4 >1/ FRANOE 57 w HAL LIM sT 0 W BLEEKER ST G/81 M ASPEN 04 In 1 W HOPKINS AVE = 9 41. 4 Skv Hotel Il E HOPKINS Â¥E ~_ E DURANT 1 s 44-4, 1 *) E Coope- 1 %,h - 9. u Pioneer .7 Gulch , ' ''. Spar e Aspen ' tx 1 _Gulch $ Grove Cem Â· , O - 6 . & Ute Cem '. '' -. Vallejo Gutch â‚¬- r_ Figure 1. Vicinity map. -.07, -Kl 0 c L 1 1 14------1 4%3-4 331 -f-1I-14-rp-l'.1-1 ... 1.,7 f 9 7 41 - .- r *Ati 1=:4~â€žr . hskyl .- 1 i L.1-9-U -4 r. 7 1 - 71095. f-.Tr''LÂ·--4 7 - TE 0 - -_ - -~ . p .. A |' .~~ 4 ' 4 i -_ r~~_~ ~lot~*1 - t. 7-~, 3 1 1 -~ 3 ,,Jo ,,> 130 1 1: ---"I -. - #r - 1 k-le- . - 1 / ./1+â€¢Aâ€¢ A Â· ./ Li ' ilik 46....a - 1 1 1 liu . J. -1 .Â·d~W 11 1 . 3 *-3.; i C-F-Zil -1!1111 ./ 1 -3 1- . .94, f \IN li~ i' 1 11 ilut'. 40#4( ' ' I 14,///'/#./; Â· ~ 2 ,'..494,z,f~ 3, ,,.%-~-: i , ff.[f. Â¥' 4 9,4 1 9 '9 -Â·1 3.111:jl.i,Jmq:.ii. c 1 .. ,\-- ~ut!111?1!Mfi ~'fittÂ·'N~ 44* Figure 2. Location of the project in relation to the City of Aspen Mudflow Zones. 2 Sky Hotel Mudflow Analysis June 25,2015 2.1 Mudflow Characterization and Processes Hyperconcentrated sediment flows (mudflows and mud floods) are part of a continuum in the "physics of flowing water and sediment movement that ranges from clear water flow to mass wasting processes (landslides)" (SLA and O'Brien, 1989). In general, the sediment transport characteristics in the continuum range from suspended and bed-load transport in water floods to mass wasting in landslide events. The National Research Council Committee (NRC, 1982) proposed four categories to delineate this continuum: water floods, mud floods, mudflows, and landslides (Table 1). The bounds of each of these categories can be approximated based on the fluid properties, and in particular by the sediment concentration (by volume) of the fluid (Figure 3).The sediment concentration of fluid is defined as the ratio of the sediment volume to the water volume and is given by: CV = Volume of Sediment / (Volume of Water + Volume of Sediment) The continuum indicates that water floods are mostly comprised of water with some sediment (low concentration of sediment), whereas, landslides are mostly comprised of bulk sediment with some water (high concentration of sediment). The concentration of the sediment is an important component in determining the physical processes that govern the behavior of the fluid-sediment mixture in each of these categories. For example, the flow characteristics of a mud flood are dominated by the turbulent and viscous forces within the fluid matrix, whereas, movement of a landslide is dominated by the dispersive stresses and particle friction. This study focuses on the sediment transport characteristics of the mud flood and mudflow categories; however a brief description of the sediment transport characteristics of the water floods and landsliding events is presented for the purpose of describing the bounding categories. Table 1. Mudflow Behavior as a Function of Sediment Concentration (FLO-2D manual, 2013). Sediment Concentration Event Flow Characteristics by Volume by Weight 0.65 - 0.80 0.83 - 0.91 Will not flow; failure by block sliding Landslide Block sliding failure with internal deformation 0.55 - 0.65 0.76 - 0.83 during the slide; slow creep prior to failure Flow evident; slow creep sustained mudflow; plastic deformation under its own weight; 0.48 - 0.55 0.72 - 0.76 cohesive; will not spread on level surface Mudflow Flow spreading on level surface; cohesive 0.45 - 0.48 0.69 - 0.72 flow; some mixing Flow mixes easily; shows fluid properties in deformation; spreads on horizontal surface but maintains an inclined fluid surface; large 0.40 - 0.45 0.65 - 0.69 particle (boulder) setting; waves appear but dissipate rapidly Marked settling of gravels and cobbles; Mud Flood 0.35 - 0.40 0.59 - 0.65 spreading nearly complete on horizontal 3 Sky Hotel Mudflow Analysis June 25, 2015 Table 1. Mudflow Behavior as a Function of Sediment Concentration (FLO-2D manual, 29-19) Sediment Concentration Event Flow Characteristics by Volume by Weig ht surface; liquid surface with two fluid phases appears; waves travel on surface Separation of water on surface; waves travel easily; most sand and gravel has settled out 0.30 - 0.35 0.54 - 0.59 and moves as bed load Distinct wave action; fluid surface; all particles resting on bed in quiescent fluid 0.20 - 0.30 0.41 - 0.54 condition Water flood with conventional suspended Water Flood < 0.20 < 0.41 load and bed load Flood flows generally have sediment concentrations of less than 20-percent (by volume). They are essentially water floods with high bed load and suspended loads where the bed load may be affected by the high concentration of suspended load (i.e., fine sediment - wash load). The sediment transport characteristics of water floods are modeled using conventional bed-load and suspended load formulas and methodologies. Landslides generally have sediment concentrations greater than 55 percent (by volume) and are considered as bulk solid movement as opposed to fluid motion. Landslides may range from slow moving earth flow and creeping soil masses to rapid rotation or slippage failures. Hyper-concentrated sediment flows are defined as flood events with sediment concentrations that range between approximately 20 and 55 percent by volume, however, the sediment concentration for a given event is generally considered to be between 20 and 45 percent (O'Brien, 2004). The fine sediment concentration (silt, clay and fine sands in the fluid matrix) controls the properties of the fluid, including, viscosity, density, and yield stress. Mudflows are non-Newtonian and they have much higher viscosities and densities compared to water flows. These properties result in mudflows having significantly slower velocities compared to water floods on the same slope. The fine sediments increase the density of the fluid matrix, which increases the buoyancy of sediments thereby creating conditions that allow gravel to boulder-sized material to be transported near the flow surface by mudflows. The yield stress is a measure of the internal fluid resistance to flow and affects both the initiation and cessation of flows. For the purposes of this report, all hyper-concentrated sediment flows (mud floods and mudflows) will be referred to as mudflows. The sediment matrix of a hyper-concentrated flow is non-homogeneous and the sediment properties change significantly as they flow down steep watershed channels or across 4 Sky Hotel Mudflow Analysis June 25, 2015 alluvial fans. As the mudflow moves over the alluvial fan, dewatering of the fluid matrix can occur by infiltration and escapement to the surface. This may further increase the concentration of the hyper-concentrated sediment flows and alter the transport characteristics of the flow. "Almost all hyper-concentrated sediment flows are fully turbulent, unsteady and non-uniform, and are characterized by surging, flow cessation, blockage, and roll waves" (SLA and O'Brien, 1989). During a mudflow event, the average sediment concentration over the duration of the hydrograph generally ranges between 20 and 35 percent by volume with peak concentrations approaching 45 percent (Table 1 and Figure 3). Most watersheds with a history of mudflow events will eventually develop a sediment supply in the channel bed such that even relatively small rainfall-runoff storms may generate mudflow surges. In general, mudflows have a distinct pattern of flood evolution. Initially, clear water flows from the basin rainfall-runoff may arrive at the fan apex. This may be followed by a surge - or frontal wave of mud and debris (40- to 50-percent concentration by volume). When the peak arrives, the average sediment concentration generally decreases to the range of 30 to 40 percent by volume. On the falling limb of the hydrograph, the sediment concentration decreases due to the reduced availability of sediment, however, surges of higher sediment concentration may occur. 1.0 111111111 0.9 - - -. 0.8 - 0.7 - - 0.6 - 0.5 - 40 - 0.4 - ~Transition Zone 0.3 - - /2 0.2 - Le /2 0.1 -/ - 0.0 / 1 1 1 lili 1 1 0.0 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.6 0.7 0.8 09 1.0 Concentration by Volume (Cv) Figure 3. Classification of hyperconcentrated sediment flows (modified from FLO- 20 Manual, 2013) 5 Concentration by Weight (Cw) ' Sky Hotel Mudflow Analysis June 25, 2015 3 FLO-2D MODELING The FLO-2D hydraulic model is recommended by the City of Aspen to simulate mudflows. Please refer to the City's Mudflow Regulations for a discussion on the parameters and operation of the FLO-2D program. FLO-2D is a 2-dimensional (2-D) hydraulic model that was developed to perform both clear-water and hyper-concentrated sediment flow-routing in channels and/or on alluvial fans with an unconfined flow path. The model utilizes a volume conservation scheme to simulate both sub-critical and super-critical flows in the channel or floodplains, as well as flows exiting from the channel to the floodplain and vice versa. Overland flow is modeled using a 2-D diffusive wave approximation of the momentum equation and the channel flow is modeled 1-dimensionally using the momentum equation. A central difference routing scheme with eight potential flow directions is used to simulate the progression of the floodwave hydrograph over a system of square grids. The FLO-2D model contains several components that are used to represent and model the complex topography and processes, including: channel-floodplain flow exchange, loss of storage due to buildings, flow obstructions, simulation of hydraulic structures, simulation of street flow and simulation of hyper-concentrated sediment flows (mudflows). Hyper- concentrated sediment flow is simulated by the FLO-2D model using a quadratic rheological model that includes viscous stress, yield stress, turbulence, and dispersive stress terms as a function of sediment concentration. FLO-2D does not have the ability to model unsteady phenomena such as surging. It also assumes a rigid boundary, and therefore, does not model aggradation or scour. 3.1 City of Aspen Official FLO-2D Model The Cities official FLO-2D model was developed by WRC, Inc. forthe City of Aspen's 2001 Drainage Master Plan (Drainage Master Plan). The Drainage Master Plan shows the mudflow depths for the 100-year event in 2-foot contour intervals (Figure 4). In the vicinity - of the Sky Hotel (highlighted in pink), the 2-foot depth contour runs north-south through the east portion of the existing building and the 4-foot depth contour is located just east of the southeast corner of the existing building. Interpolating between these depths indicates that the mud flow depths are less than 2 feet at the north and west faces of the building and slightly less than 4 feet at the southeast corner of the building. 3.2 Duplicate Model The City's Mudflow regulations require a duplicate model be developed using the official FLO-2D input files developed by WRC, Inc. for the Drainage Master Plan. Many of the input files were not available from the City or their consultants, WRC, for this west portion of Aspen. Thus, it was not possible to develop a duplicate model. On previous projects conducted by Tetra Tech within the east portion of Aspen, such as Top of Mill, Lift 1 Neighborhood and South Aspen projects, the duplicate models with 100- foot elements predicted very similar mudflow extents and depths compared to the Drainage Master Plan. Although the model output were not exactly the same, it is Tetra Tech's opinion that the duplicate models from previous analyses sufficiently demonstrates that the Drainage Master Plan models can be reproduced, and will predict similar flow patterns and depths, thereby demonstrating compatibility and consistency between the Drainage Master Plan and current version of FLO-2D. 6 - Sky Hotel Mudflow Analysis June 25, 2015 164#*47**w*x 1 Jm o weu , 7~Er-*>fi_r 0 9020 \Al / & 6 .4 -, 27* 4,0 0 a @=>,~j $4 . 7.Vapâ€¢-0-9. . <\.1-4 C AS#Y,/ 6 ,#53 09 â‚¬47 , 9 0 - i 2<- . ..\ j ///C:4 1 r708>23 :,Â· 2-7 313 1/ ter.\ *4370,0 8 ; 0 - id h /0 9.23 42Â¥ 1 .49,4 ' 0 . Â£/ h A 0 -0/1 .91 24* U -L,r-,4 1 10 Calct! N lit ' /1 2 N KY' 1"///i 0 . 0: )40/34*467$5 O 6 Â· / 01 5402 4 ,- 00 & liffilifgioi:*A, 4-- ; ; , r . 4:$16"94535430** 0 7 44**.5 Â¢ 81 0 j Sky Hotel .. - 7/ /#f/bwf,4,4 2 *~ 7 m:>434Â£:ij~m18 F y Â»Â« 42973/ QU f C]t 3*A jh 4 /1 2295 , 4/"f,> 1' 440 --.CU,LES'I lillil '1 9 Â»ist:~ a..3; <-1 0,-1 21//162.*2 Figure 4. Predicted maximum mudflow depth for the 100-year peak flow event. Figure ES-7 from the City of Aspen Drainage Master Plan (2001). 3.3 Existing Conditions Model An existing conditions FLO-2D model was developed to evaluate the debris flow inundation in the vicinity of the Sky Hotel. The model is based on a 25-foot grid size and contains 54,298 elements. The Grid Developer System (GDS), which is part of the FLO-2D model, was used to assign elevations to each of the grid elements using the 2012 LiDAR mapping provided by the - City of Aspen GIS department. The City's GIS files are based on NGVD29 datum, and the site plan uses the NAVD88 datum. The conversion from NGVD29 to NAVD88 is 5.31 feet. 3.3.1 Clearwater Hydrographs Rainfall runoff hydrographs (commonly referred to as the clearwater hydrographs) developed for the Drainage Master Plan were developed by WRC Engineering, Inc. using the Colorado Unit Hydrograph Procedure (CUHP). The 2001 runoff hydrographs were not available for this project and therefore, new runoff hydrographs were developed using a similar methodology to the 2001 analyses. The 2001 analysis applied a rainfall value of 1.63 inches for the 100-year, 1-hour rainfall event based on the NOAA Atlas 14. The 100-year, 2-hour rainfall was calculated by multiplying the 1-hour event by 1.16 to obtain a rainfall of 1.89 inches for the 2-year event. The resulting 100-year, 2-hour hydrograph was then computed using CHUP. The recently updated NOAA rainfall estimates (Atlas 14, Volume 8, Version 2) for the 100- year, 1-hour rainfall depth is 1.27 inches. Because the new rainfall values and corresponding mud-flow depths have not yet been adopted by the City, the 2001 precipitation depths are used to develop the runoff hydrographs for this project. 7 Sky Hotel Mudflow Analysis June 25, 2015 The hydrology for the Drainage Master Plan was developed using a DOS based version of CHUP. For this project, the runoff hydrographs were computed using the newer Excel spreadsheet version of CHUP (Version 1.4.4) and the hydrologic basin parameters detailed in the Drainage Master Plan. The following methodology was used to develop inflow hydrographs for the FLO-2D model. 1. The tributary sub-basins to the Sky Hotel were identified and are referenced using the Drainage Master Plan naming conventions; they includes subbasins 5,6,9,11,13, 14, 15, 16, 20, 22, 23 and 24. 2. The sub-basin parameters listed in the Drainage Master Plan were used to develop the flow hydrographs using CUHP Version 1.4.4. Input parameters are taken directly from the Drainage Master Plan and include: Precipitation depths o Pervious Detention Basin Area o Impervious Detention Basin Length o Initial Infiltration Rate Centroid Length o Horton's Decay Coefficient Impervious Area o Final Infiltration Rate Slope 3. The predicted flow hydrographs were distributed across a series of inflow elements in the FLO-2D model to represent an appropriate flow conveyance from each subbasin. Due to changes in the CUHP methodology, the peak flows predicted by the CHUP Version 1.4.4.computes vary slightly compared to the Drainage Master Plan (Table 2). Table 2. Comparison of the predicted peak flows for the 100-year, 2-hour rainfall event for the Drainage Master Plan and CHUP Version 1.4.4. CUHP Flow Summary CUHP Version Basin Drainage Master 1.4.4 Plan 5 43 22 6 80 45 9 75 35 11 81 95 13 47 22 14 73 67 15 11 5 16 111 94 20 85 39 22 86 84 - 23 224 225 24 87 81 3.3.2 Mudflow Hydrographs The clear-water inflow hydrograph is input to the FLO-2D model at a specified elements near the head of the debris fans. The clearwater hydrograph is then bulked with sediment 8 000000 Sky Hotel ~ Mudflow Analysis June 25, 2015 using a developed sediment concentration (by volume, Cv) hydrograph to represent the mudflow hydrograph. The total volume of the water and sediment in a mudflow can be determined by multiplying the clearwater volume by the bulking factor, where the bulking factor is defined by: BF = 1/(1 - Cv) For example, a sediment concentration of 10 percent (Cv=0.10) creates a bulking factor of 1.11, indicating the flood volume is 11 percent greater than if the flood was considered to be only water. The sediment concentration hydrograph was developed to represent the likely variation in sediment concentration throughout the storm hydrograph based on previous studies and recommendations provided in the FLO-2D manual. The developed sediment concentration hydrographs have characteristics similar to the typical hydrograph presented in (Figure 5). 50 0.50 --Water 45 0.45 -Sedinient - - Sediment Concentration 40 0.40 Or- I % 0.35 0 30 0.30 1 / 25 ' 025 1 \ \ 20 -----1 ------ ------------------ 0.20 15 0.15 5 0.05 0 0.00 0 20 40 60 80 100 120 140 160 180 200 Time (min) Figure 5. Typical sediment concentration hydrographs. 9 Discharge (cf uo!le.Ilileolloo welll! 1]es Sky Hotel Mudflow Analysis June 25, 2015 Characteristics of sediment concentrations that are shown on Figure 5 and considered in this analysis for Sky Hotel include the following: 1. The initial rising limb and the last part of the recessional limbs of the hydrographs have a sediment concentration of 20 percent, which corresponds to the minimum concentration for a mudflow. 2. The steep rising limb of the hydrograph is bulked to a maximum concentration of 45 percent to simulate the frontal wave of the mudflow. The peak of the sediment concentration hydrograph occurs 6 minutes before the peak of the clearwater hydrograph. 3. The sediment concentration at the peak of the clearwater hydrograph is less than the peak sediment concentration in order to simulate water dilution. 3.3.3 Other Input Data Files Width reduction factors (WRFs) and area reduction factors (ARFs) are assigned to the FLO-2D grid elements to represent the blockage of flow paths and reduction in storage that predominantly occurs due to the presence of buildings. Width reduction factors are applied to represent the blockage of flow through the side of an element, while ARFs represent the loss of floodplain storage volume due to the buildings. For example, a wall might obstruct 40 percent of the flow width of a grid element side and a building could cover 75 percent of the same grid element. The ARFs and WRFs were computed using ArcGIS by overlaying the building outlines on the FLO-2D grid. A roughness value of 0.085 was applied to the model grid to represent all areas except the streets. Street elements are assigned to the FLO-2D model to represent the elevation and roughness characteristics of the street. Street elements typically have different conveyance and storage properties compared to the floodplain elements. Street elements are important as they act as conduits for conveying flood flows and have the ability to store sediment. Street widths and elevations were measured from the aerial photographs and the 2012 mapping. The curb height was set at 0.5 feet for the streets that were observed to have a curb and gutter. A Manning's n-value of 0.020 was assigned to the street elements and the Froude numbers were limited to 1.5 in the FLO-2D model. A summary of the FLO-2D input values are listed in Table 3. 3.3.4 Existing Conditions Model Results The predicted maximum mudflow depths in the vicinity of the Sky Hotel vary from 0.5 feet to 1.8 feet along the northwest faces of the building (Durant and South Spring Street) to 3.9 feet on the southeast corner of the building (Figure 6). These depths are similar in extent and magnitude to the depths shown on the Drainage Master Plan. The mudflow travels from the south to the north along a natural flow path located to the east of the Sky Hotel. Mudflow typically reaches the hotel site by moving laterally along the alleys from the main flow path. There is little direct mudflow impact on the Sky Hotel. 10 Sky Hotel Mudflow Analysis June 25, 2015 Table 3. FLO-2D Input Parameters used in the Existing and Project conditions models. FLO-2D Value Parameter System English i Number of Grid Elements 59,928 Element Size 25 feet % Area Reduction (due to natural obstructions) 10 percent Manning's n Overland Roughness Value 0.085 Max. Allowable Overland Froude Number 0.90 Street Width 16.5 feet Street Curb Height 0.5 feet Manning's n Street Roughness Value 0.02 Maximum Allowable Street Froude Number 1.7 - Storm Hydrograph Length 2 hours Storm Hydrograph Increment 0.1 hours Sediment Concentration 0.2 to 0.45 11 Sky Hotel Mudflow Analysis June 25, 2015 442+ * Mj 4 4. th 5 1 1.19 * 0.7.14 31 911> , . 0 0. 7 , 2 # . t . Â« - *I *~ IÂ·L ''%*- :' 4.. .. 2 L . 44 :iT ... . - I Etan,4 ,.. ,. I 4 10 42 4 r . . t 4 13 1 0 4 .. 2 I -4 - SKy 6,074 r . 1 0 . ... /2 4 Sky Hotel Maximum Mudflow |0~| TETRATECH 100-yr Event Existing Conditions e - Existing Contours NOT TO SCALE Figure 6. Existing conditions mudflow contours. 12 ;S leu!5!10 .3 4, 4, D. Sky Hotel Mudflow Analysis June 25, 2015 3.4 Project Conditions Model The proposed project conditions model was developed by modifying the Existing model to reflect the changes in the building footprint and some minor grading along the exterior edges of the building. The proposed project footprint is mostly the same as the existing building, except for and additional small triangular shaped area measuring approximately 45 feet wide by 60 feet at the southeast corner of the building and a slightly wider building width running north-south parallel to Spring Street. The ARF factors in the model were modified to reflect the building modifications. No other changes were made to the input files. The model was run over the 100-year, 2-hour inflow hydrograph (Figure 7). 3.4.1 Project Conditions Model Results The project conditions model predicts both increases and decreases in mudflow depths of approximately 0.2 feet in the vicinity of the building (Figures 8 and 9). Increases are only shown on the Figure 8. Slightly higher increases occur near the north entrance and at the southeast corner adjacent to the triangular addition. The model predicts that the area of depth increase is confined within the property boundaries and that the proposed development will not cause increases in mud depths at offsite properties; this is an expected result, since the Existing and Project footprints are very similar. 13 Sky Hotel Mudflow Analysis June 25, 2015 P % I - " .9.- f.- I f... . , 64 n . E F 1/ . 65 -I I. f . J'M4 2 I. Â¥ --- 4.:/ ' -%. I I. i .. 2 1 .4 E. 64,-entÂ«ve.-7---=. .Â»r 1, 1 , 4 f . 10) ... P. 2 1 -,1* . .. D 0 - 0 , + I I I . ALâ€ž 1 I .5 r-*42 ~ ' D / 4 39, :* I. ....... e 4 St. 44 f * VÂ· 1 41 0 ' SKY HOTEL lit .. 4 2Â· 7.L b '4 1 H - ... ..6.-eirm.9 Â¥ Final Final ly- =1 4 &4~ -- -- . proposed proposed 1 1 - grade grade , Design 6 Point NAVD 88 NGVD 29 Mud depth Freeboard depths A 7937.8 7932.5 1.3 1 2.3 B -7937.9--- 7932.6 ._L_ 7942 7936.7 2.0 ll3 --_ D___ 7944.5 7939.2 26 ~_ 1 _j _. 3.6 _ .4 E 7945.6 _ _ 7940.3 -_. 2.6 - __ _ .1__ -- i-_ 3-6 F 7946.8 7941.5 2.6 1 3.6 G ._ 4946.2 4940.9 11 1 1 .2.1 H 7945.2 7939.9 1.1 1 I 2.1 1 7942.8 7937.5 ' 1.8 1 2.8 J 7941.7 7936.4 1.7 1 - 27 k Sky Hotel Maximum Mudflow ~~~ TETRATECH 100-yr Event Projected Conditions e - Project Conditions NOT TO SCALE Figure 7. Predicted mudflows depth and design depths under project conditions in the vicinity of the Sky Hotel. 14 Sky Hotel Mudflow Analysis June 25, 2015 -I . 7 E. Durant Ave. '44 . tÂ·, A . Ir 4 . J. .4 3-*D .. .â€¢ , 41 0 - -- . . 05 0 , I. 1 , 4 0.2' b. I r t â€¢ ' 0 '34>AL .A T y , 0 1 . SKY HOTEL . --1. 02/*791 1 -'-' 1 11 0.2' h 0% ... . 0 - Sky Hotel Maximum Mudflow ~~ TETRATECH 100-yr Event e Difference - Difference Contours NOT TO SCALE Figure 8. Difference in maximum mud depth between project and existing conditions in the vicinity of the Sky Hotel. 15 Sky Hotel Mudflow Analysis June 25, 2015 4 RECOMMENDATIONS The predicted maximum mudflow depths for the 100-year, 2-hour peak flow event are detailed at 10 locations in the vicinity of the project (Figure 8). The design depth is the predicted mudflow depth plus a freeboard depth. Building penetrations such as a windows or doors should be set at or above the design depth. A minimum of 3 feet of freeboard is typically recommended for all walls that will have direct impact forces from mudflow and debris. In the case of the Sky Hotel, however, most of the building is impacted by mud flows moving laterally from the east or is in the shadow of up-fan buildings; therefore, a 1-foot freeboard is recommended. If the design depth cannot be achieved, then impact resistant glass could be considered for windows with the capabilities to withstand the required static and dynamic forces as discussed below. In the case of doors and garage doors, two conditions should be considered if the design depth cannot be achieved. First, the door should be designed for static and dynamic loading and include provisions for seepage, and secondly, there should be an alternative exit for people to leave the building. At the underground parking garage accessed at location '1' (Figure 8), it is likely that vehicles will not be able to leave the underground garage until the mud is removed from the garage door. There are two types of loading conditions that should be considered for mudflow at the Sky Hotel: flow momentum (dynamic) loading and post (static) flow loading. For design recommendations, we defer to the loading criteria provided in the City of Aspen Mudflow Regulations, Chapter 7. Impact loading or direct impacts at the Sky Hotel from debris such as boulders, are unlikely because the South Alps building located uphill of the Sky Hotel blocks a significant amount of mudflow. Furthermore the largest mud depths are caused by flows backing up, or flows moving laterally towards the east side of the hotel. 5 SUMMARY AND CONCLUSIONS A 2-dimensional mudflow analysis was conducted to evaluate the impacts of the Sky Hotel renovation. The analysis followed procedures outlined in the City of Aspen Mudflow Regulations. The mudflow modeling was conducted using FLO-2D for existing and project conditions. The FLO-2D model output indicates that the majority of mudflow reaches the hotel site by moving laterally into the alleys above and below the hotel. There is little direct mudflow impact on the Sky Hotel. Model results indicate the project can be constructed in compliance with the City's mudflow regulations. Specifically, the proposed development will not cause increases in mud depths at offsite properties, and the construction of the building will be designed for mudflow depths ranging between 1.8 to 3.5 feet, including freeboard. 16 Sky Hotel Mudflow Analysis June 25, 2015 6 REFERENCE FLO-2D, 2014. Pro. FLO-2D Software, Inc., Nutrioso, AZ. National Research Council, 1982. "Selecting a methodology for delineating mudslide hazard areas for the National Flood Insurance Program." National Academy of Sciences report by the advisory Board on the Built Environment, Washington, D.C. O'Brien, J.S., 2004. Simulating Mudflow Guidelines. Guidelines provided with FLO-2D model. O'Brien, J.S., and Lenzotti & Fullerton Consulting Engineers, Inc., 1989. Flood Hazard Delineation on Alluvial Fans and Urban Floodplains. Urban Drainage and Flood Control District, 2005. User Manual - Colorado Urban Hydrograph Procedure Excel-Based Computer Program (CHHP2005). 39 p. 17 #=/6Â£4 1 11 - Â·.......I-I.'-r,av r ?4 lim' 1Â¥ - . ==.....UU.... li . Wi 11 = == ' Â¥:4 flâ€¢ 1 '1 1 4 i it . 1, d lip! 1 i 9,6 Â· .. 1 r: 1 JÂ»11--1---' 6."JJ -1 - 1 ./.11 11 1- -JIt I fi///~/ Approximate FootprintÂ· b. rl 1 -] ..t I - Existing Building ,.7 --* Ji I 1 1 11 7 4 ' -1 1 I-L. 1.jA j;.L.-.1 ----L- -â€¢-â€¢-â€¢F ,Â·:18-4111Â£7111 ;41..'4-4-1â€¢.iÂ·:-:Â·:; :i:4 I .i:.4.1 "m::2-111:11!-F 't \ I f /1.-11&:Fli: IÂ·Â·;Hi Â·:Â·i' 1Â·1{!;qt;4-:11- i..--.,f-r-i-Â·I...3 :1â€ži.:.:4Â£Lit#,-il. ,/, r 45' 1lt'+*!:~ -~tÂ·Iri:-:I)3;~**4H~ \I~ LJ ./ 1 1 - -- ..- - 1 -- . Tv.,ICâ€¢er,~4t rti~% ~21 t. ar:.I Addition k. rul. -[.,a...4~ I Ba'.... .14â€¢Ut=...l..%. PREUMINARY NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION Mudflow Analysis June 25, 2015 Sky Hotel Attachment 1- Site Plan 8L ATTACHMENT G SKY HOTEL PERFORMANCE GUARANTEES N , 7, ' 44Â«0Â·' i PUBLIC FACILITIES & PUBLIC INFRASTRUCTURE GUARANTEE Z 'Awl"'1~*S 1- , : 91 +99&93 ITEM MANTI.UNI-4 UNITCOST COST SITE IMPROVEMENTS LEGEND O %1ie~0*IU- 8 ABANDONENSâ„¢GWATERSERVICE 1 M $ MOD. S 1 50000 t*g ABAND<~aâ„¢GSEWERSERVICE 2 EA 1 $ 1500 OD S 300000 -- Â·-- - -- ---- --- tal:,IDrr [:1 : -:.2... !,OVEE....CABLESERVICE 1 ts I S 1./00 S 1500 00 m,opier,LME > :Â· t:287':,-lit-p-*- :ck----- . _ REMOVEANDRELOCATE Emâ„¢G:. XYDRANT 1 LSIS ]50000 $ 3500. -1 - 0Â«01Â·0550-rS.0,VU.~4Â¤ B~~ /.- - Â· .-- / 0--Il-~E~CIA-I. ' .1.%& - RE'OVE'ID.RE_NSTALLL/g~TE~9 1 -- 3 E. -3- , 50.00 S 300000 L~ r ~.1 - pROPOS~0~01*M.WER 8 r M*rnA-ni &*h.=X- - % AEMOVEAND/%*STREETS~N i 6 EA | S 50000 6 300000 -- REMOVECAPE>~S..9'SERV.ES .LS $ 900: S 1 800.00 I -- - - -11 ..O.0-TPA~Mell x~~-.1 f-~ ~--Â·76%-1 Ol/44/Vr4'6Vt,4 iNSTALLGASSERVICELNE 36 LF I $ 4000 3 140000 4. E~â€¢Sf64*r) -- -4Â· - -- .44/ 4 -7-2331 -- -ISTALLNEW..... SERVICEW,G V 1...ST.LOCKSAND MEGALUGS 5 OCO 00 S .:STALLNEW' SEWER......(PICS'.28 7500 $ 2 250 [:0 - - ---- I 2 t?li 2000 S 10 000 Do e ~ , Â· ' Â·4=2 u Â· TRENCHJNG wr}Â¢I ALLEY I GLITT~R. TmA ;NSTA~NEWTELEPHONESERViCE'*EY , 37Â©, LF H 500 S 1 850.00 UTILITY LEGEND ~ ISTALL NEWCABLESERViCENAUEY UffOC,LE ls_-_ -1.1 __25OJ~ -I-/ 4. '.A, CLASS 6 AG*EGATE BASE COURSE I, UNDERAU ASPHAUANDSÂ©EWALK PAVEWENTS, 1 165 CY IS MOO S P~101â€¢!5-0 -~-- U.SfALLNEwiFLEC~CSERV,672FY --- -- ---- -- - ---- - 1 2% LF |S IBOO $ 7 11000 -- - d - pRapoul....senÂ«:E ~L *P 1 6 E. 15 80000 S 45]000 -In - PROPOSED .S CROSSWALKFAVEMEN1/APO<NGS =- 7 Afe:h#X I ...% COPJCÂ·aETE SOEWALKS 5000 S 3 75000 --I -* - PRopoll....ROL....IC & TRUNC~ED[Â©MES ~ *54: 1500 5 285000 -â€¢ -1. - PROPOSGO TELEAâ€¢01* '3 +SCI,Pu.,0~~.u, ' ~HWIE*MWEA _ 4176 SF |S BOO S 33.400 00 -, _. _ P*C*'OSED W. 456 LF |S 42.00 5 m.. -# -Â· - PROPOSEDFÂ»eA i nA ACM 'W.. . " 1. c i ./ MDI .*lE, NON ./$!VE / 1 / V -Â£ ~â„¢ .PEACATUICURB 42.00 5 1,8000 \ %/ , fl / -4-2 f 1 7.71 500â‚¬ SFIS 800 S 46448 DO D El IS 1 250 00 S looDODD 0 p,~,p~8EDWAIEAV~LVE ' PER PLAT -- - . CALPERIREES 4 Ekis U APPRoa.WW*]MOF h 25Â·CAU'ERTAEES 60000 S 2 400 00 M PROPOSEDWwki P-0-OP.St~ER..V. ~ Â· 2 i. p fi 822573:#~. SEEDNG AND) TEUPORARÂ¥ IRSCON 1400 S F 1$ 150 S 360000 pRce...EleCT<T~WWO-11 9 -- PERACS'STANDI. 9 r PVC BASEDOM MTIWED 1 SUB-TOTAL S 18452300 CONCEPTUA..1/N - MOBLIZATION 1LSI$ 7 50000 5 7 500 00 A~PRa~IATitOCATÂ¥]NOF 13 I 6 ~ ; / F. i / f 8 p.posâ€¢Â¤.#RCUANOUT -mSIDDOOI,4.TKWA1.I i â€žs~,:&1 .o,in.cr.c TRAFFIC CONTROL , 1 LS 'S 1050000 S 1050000 ,~, PR~o~u~TOAMDÂ«*T * 9 /2 0 TM~~ORMER ANDE.Câ„¢...r CONSTRUCTION SURVEYS OBSERVATION TES.iNG & A&%.S I ILS|: 1000000 S 1000000 ----Â· --- ---- EX~TINGV,t-* GATEVA~v, P,Rar.OF ~ \. ? ' / . r. 1.01.-GE NDUT,U,YEAMMENr SUB-TOTI S 212 52300 ------Â·~ ---Â· ~ - -- Ens-GOANI;ARYSEAWâ„¢-I : 3 08.$1 ASPENWAT{~0~~~ ~* ;~~ P~9 / / / IN~AuIliw Il~MONEANOCA- z z .4/2 EUCTRIC.IE~PHOHE.CUI / 15% CONTINGENCY S 31 578 . . .-11 AND,mUD,T,rSERÂ¥ICES ROU' HATEAU DUMONT m./,1/10,AU~,ArkRDOU E j# ! ~ tc~/0 W....,â€ž0',' .'.I TOTAL | $ 241,401 45 --Â·+ --' - ~ISTWAELEC IELE,C~BLE,G~S ~ a &8=5 OPTIC'.al/Me N294 -- Â· i ----- -- EXI.*ELED Te. CAILE =ego, 12. 'f, 1,1 1 --- Â·, --- ~Â·Â· Â· Â· ---- EXITINQ TiUMO46 Bi a I j " i 1 ....t...,lu,NIal, : l -- Ens*MiCDÂ¢ I -Â«/1/' Â·Â· -- 1!f 11 1 ' flâ€¢r,. 3 GUAAVIP+AN#. sm.MIATB -â„¢aut.luttw=e ' ~1 - EX,STWOF,~FOPTIC 5.1 i-- *: led . d ,; / f . 0........... 10*--- 1 lit CHATEAU CHAUMONT ---- PlaPERTY'â‚¬ / t 1 1 10, I I i _ I I if I I CAS#/wt!12~V. I , ./MINAB -7 / - 9 MOVIDaTINGC~USERmFEED + i Inlk./. b f . 1 1 kfi: 1 1 * '~81%*-*1 4 *INDC' B,6,< Â£ 1 7 1 /1 111 . G)~ST,G-184 K. %Wl*$ -/. -1 - 7- -A ........A~0~6 5. 1 % ; Â£*1<...TER Li .inliNO D~ON'Â·.U fi EXISTING b.- I U.ING./.TRIC-'I 709 ~~@pTEL --142.-134. 'MITIVE fl Nf 2/ i U .I.*CA..... & ; 6*ISTW~SEWEACU~NOUT LOT- 42,3369 ILEA~OVE~k~DHON~ --1-- -,1 2 -,%%.-~3<- 5 Elsâ„¢0 610RN Wl ANDCAn,25Â£,lvel 1 111 j ' 1 Â»57 1'4 :-4. V 1 1 REÂ¥Ovil=111.GEUCTIK rlkA~0*6,ER 0,klITER ~ER HO~ 31 *?2 N~ . 4 1 "16â€žn,* -Â·~ ~ 1 t. 2 Â¢9 C*~11-A~~M . / 0,4/ / , , fÂ« 2 %\..-- T[...2 1-1.- 11 .MOWE16*WIPEDESTAi , / . BCOMCLST 5TAND,â€¢ADS I 7 1 I ./ f 1 j // 9--1-(-/-4- GLORÂ¥H W 1 1,If CONDOMIM~IS / 4- l / c I ,..O.0 . , - '6 4.. / U- 9 ElaSTIâ€ž60,SURm - -.Â£ Â·4 1 J \2\< Â·1 -* =' 1/ \ ------- - -It . /. ,-,464â€ž ' 2 b-Â©, ,-2- \Â·12~ % - I ~:~~ ,â‚¬269 -L- - T P,Arlas- 7 . 4,46\ J . n , UXATION --7--- Â·- 71 - . ,-4, rÂ£29., - W~ ~:*b- . _ , -,101'U'. 1/TAuNfw6.-VUIO~LINDING , L I.'ll"'WN PER./WW...no....Au -/\ lut, i4 j.:j ':f f .......RAT F....Â£~NG I AGeEEMENTFOR PRWATE 'IloCATTE~~TIN~0~~AW+TO 1 / 11 ./ t *%7,'~ .CAN,/Am)/'TER J I It i ; Â·jl , . M DE,Allâ„¢ENriT#* 1 .:. 4, .Q ...~ - u.-u, piaÂ£,r- coAR~ CANI~UP,PO==Â»2/VAL/SLILL-- --------- - <Â»re v (L. \ . -- --PR-- N. NT- T'Z: . ,.~0 GRAPHIC SCALE T \\/\ 7 .F f .i/ (INFEETI U) , 1 \ ..- - r 1.7 If REDL,C.FORSL-nk 1911 DATE: 7-14Â·16 Ca||befor, you di~ JOE NO. 14040 V/272= SHEET EX~IBIT .03/40153. .....0 THEUTTLE NELL HOTâ‚¬l '15 1VNIEI~ 1N3 A303 1310 33.LNVAdÂ¥n9 3hln100241 nl=INI 9 93Ull10Â¥=1 Onarld 3~N~~ 1N~10'3 Nollvollddv M31A33 0311Â¥130 1N3INd013/\30 G3NNÂ¥ld SITE IMPROVEMENTS LEGEND -29' / -- *-- - - - --' - -- - m'~40 BASEMENT t:28 #SH 4 4, .44<1 _, -.rÂ« - ,*TallÂ¢K - .0 - PROPOSED"TS"sul.NCE Z f '161;m:' A k.. 4 4 PROPOSED STO!Ul 'WEI Â·-- -- Exisiwos..Sel,EA d~;21122imils:&- ~ -4'u -* - Ff, -.?4 JL,11 -- ..~GE#W- 12 -.u) l. 7 --3. *~9*- -z>,r~~~'< -- 3- W :8 0. -Â·Â».Â·:,~0 ~~~AVENUE - Â· ----. , - -ITEM 1 QUAN ITY 1 UNrr 1 u,lir cOST | COST OFFSITE {ROW)DRAINAGE II.MOVEMENTS i % e._ i *'.*/04. D * a - I .kw'All.*..6.-/â€¢ . e . 1 .IS 60 OD 1, 3,000 00 - .4. 4 4. 11* r -TAUNAWiT#'# /| LF 15 n.00 IS 5 250 DO . WTPERCOAS~~C~e I -Ce-- \ 24'â€¢7 I I E. 15 .0.0015 1200000 1 ; ~ ...... 1 2 00AINC#St 9% C04Â£NWOLE 2 EA 1 5 3 000 001 5 ./. ON ITE DRAINAGE IMPROVEMENTS .*M ITE M ~QUANTITYI UNIT 1 UNHCOST COST ROW, N .... M DRA... , 240 i LF M . Do 1 12 U00 00 I ./ ST*t 36 39AN FIFE . 1 LE IS ./ 3 4 410 DO 1 44 1 0 h 149.90 5 7 D20 PQ 12 PVC SU? 36 DRA~ PIPE I 300 1 . IS $501 1 1050010 2- , DIU,1*E I. TRANFICPAETRENCHDR414 $ WI- 1 -==A - - %..- ADASLCTDRAIN ./ 1 .' |5 90:Â® S 12500 00 (9 ,,> . 1 .........'..' , T .~' AREANET 11 I B. I ' 1 200.00 $ 13200 Do 4X 1 9 Il~' i. 1- 0-g,- - , ' -~ - u'auv.t-â€¢LBVAULi 3 1 EA I S 25.000,00 5 75 DCO CO 9 - ; OVEAflo,VM S.VIC'ul,[n.iEST-Kni ./ | . |S 17.00 5 2.535.00 - , .. | 92 | 5 35.00 S 63 6. Do 3, , Â· 8....411)*EA Â·6 I...1.WRA~E UNER '4. i x & Imi i '' -- --'Â·4Â·CK . .......'P.... S.VACEUS. BKIE./.IN | 2/ | LF |S 3D 00 5 7 800 00 ' te-- coNNES,).To CilÂ·,/TOausÂ¥/El | 3 | Ek |S 2 0// $ 610.00 j lilli #71. Â·b . 1//Le,moli I L. |5 7 too 00 5 7500 00 ........1- 1 I Is Is 9000x 3 2 5 3 5 i.......... SUalCUL $ 27B,815 00 .44 -I CONSTAJCDCNI S.VEYS CBSER.'AIN TESTNG .ASaul~LIS , 1 .5 :5 1. 000. 1 If 000 00 1 :f -\Wl{ rf[,5,1,CURB.VAUTLA)* 0 TEAU DOMONT , / i 1,(Â£P . SU i TOPANF.W.. 1,/C"1/9,0 5 41 /2225 {A TOTAL $324637.25 liEREDW*t*CA~EÂ»kA~OB ~ ~ ~ -~ ' // 'Â· U i I j ./--9*Â· 1 1 4 f . ~ UICAW + ,f-~h G Â· ~1 i '71 1.4.-. 1 & ' f 77 lu,UP ..)...r , , CHATEAU CHAUMONT ri 1 2-24 tw~., 1 1 1 i 1 1 -6 ar.1 , // 1 7"LF 6'PVCOU~14FIP~ ..10.'0~,a,4/ 2 & i i , < L 1 1 1 s,rEUN~*ILI4RK r ; liwolirlÂ«WET i . -1 1 Â£ I ':, 4 1 Â·,1 1 -/1 - r -1- j BLOCK 107 ALLEY SKY HOTEL \ 709 E. OURANTAVE ij d 4 ; *tifu- 1 - *. M.RAT. lRINDÂ¢ 7. LOT: 42.3369 - ::m j ===A= -h <. f > 1.,Â·E Â§1/1 1 ~NEAâ„¢ENT r - t'! -11.t. =*===Mi *0~0 .-I ---N -173---1 44\ 8 , /1. J %......*'ll/).4/ATI LANDSCAMAAEA~ORWATER ClL,AurTTRE,lkiEI,$0,C,UrY QUAUT...TMENT *TWG~HOE,-1 , 108Â¢Â·e w/uvlRFLOW IN,K u*iAGNOUNDWAT" QUAUI........ , 0\ 2 OUAUTITALAT-NTVAUT % & 1\1 ... UNDERGAO'.WATER GLORY HOU ........1/ h ..Â·I U 1.f- N- CONDOMINIUMS I.AN~&CAPINGal,EAI Â»% =1 :mle t '4O~LF,Â§-PV~o~Wil~ t 30~LFWAC~STO-101 ~512ETOIECONARM*D WAtt~O~,11, IMEAT~E,~r ~ %, -- /1 1 U.AUNEÂ¥,1- , \~ SrANDAnDS ,/ill....... 4/,Â»k. // E 1 14.7.,r .&# \1-".6 V ' - 1 9 * ~ ~RAPHIC 5CA~ ~ W E % LAN050,~AAeH*WATE,k/ Â«FrICitlz~~;~~~~ ~ ~~ ~~ ~~~~~~ OUAU!~iMA-1Â« I 1 :'0' TO â€¢u,u~iâ€ž-* 1 ~al,c-4J *' , , f , I . 11.FEETI .cd.Z.*9~-1 - ---- . ..: 1 ..... 2 E t\/ REOUCLOFOAS...T. P 1'' ~; - f ---------Â·EL=Â»4'*31. 2%:@ 4%PEN ALP5 BUILDING 100 .#t=- * r- S KnoÂ¥/ whar, bolOW. DATE: 7.1/16 Ca|| bifm youdig. JOBNO. 14040 Clu 2-.=.MI *# 11696-t==F SHEET EXHIBIT .-,1 ir,irTri NOI~ 1.SNOO O-7LE NEU},om Elunlonbl-19Â¥HdNI N IS:=10 9 31ISNO 1NBINd013AE!03!H 131 3ANBAV 1NnInG 1N31â€¢!d013A30 G3NNYÂ·ld C Legal Tabs Co 1-800-322-3022 Recycled ~ Stock # DOA-5-S APPENDIX C 1 1.l\ ~ ' Legal Tabs Co 1-800-322-3022 * Stock#DO-10-S EXHIBIT 1-71 SKY HOTEL SUBDIVISION/PD DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT THIS SKY HOTEL DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT (the"Agreement") is made and entered into this of 2015 by and between THE CITY OF ASPEN, COLORADO, a municipal corporation (hereinafter referred to as "City"), and ASPEN CLUB LODGE PROPERTIES, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company (hereinafter referred to as "ACLP"). WITNESS E TH: WHEREAS, ACLP has submitted to the City an application for Planned Development - Detailed Review approval (the "Application") for that certain property in the City of Aspen, Colorado more particularly described on Exhibit A attached hereto and a made a part hereof by this reference (the "Property"), which Application requests the approval and recordation of an Approved Plan Set documenting the design, layout and configuration o f the proposed development (the "Approved Plan Set"); and the approval, execution and recordation of a Final Plat of the Sky Hotel Subdivision/Planned Development (the "Final Plat"); and WHEREAS, City has fully considered the Application, the Approved Plan Set, the Final Plat, the proposed development and improvement o f the Property, and the effects o f the proposed development and improvement of said Property on adjoining or neighboring properties and property owners; and WHEREAS, City has approved the Application and in connection therewith has imposed certain conditions and requirements in connection with its approval and recordation of the Approved Plan Set and its approval, execution and recordation of the Final Plat, such matters being necessary to protect, promote and enhance the public safety, health and welfare; and WHEREAS, ACLP is willing to acknowledge, accept, abide by and faithfully perform 11 the conditions and requirements imposed by City in approving the Application, the Approved Plan Set, and the Final Plat; and WHEREAS, pursuant to Section 26.490.060.B., Site Protection Guarantee, and Section 26.490.060.C., Site Enhancement Guarantee, of Title 26, Land Use Regulations, of the Aspen Municipal Code ( the "Regulations"), City is entitled to certain financial guarantees to ensure recovery of the Property and surrounding grounds to a safe and visually acceptable condition, and the installation of public improvements on or adjacent to the Property in the event of a work stoppage, and ACLP is prepared to provide such guarantees as hereinafter set forth; and ' WHEREAS, pursuant to Section 26.490.070.A. 1., Landscape Guarantee; Section 26.490.070.A.7., Public Facilities and Public Infrastructure Guarantee; and Section 26.490.070.8., Storm Water and Drainage Improvements Guarantee, of the Regulations, City is entitled to certain financial guarantees to ensure (i) that the required landscaping is implemented and maintained, (ii) that required public facilities are installed and (iii) the successful Page 1 of 23 implementation of required storm water and drainage infrastructure, and ACLP is prepared to provide such guarantees as hereinafter set forth; and WHEREAS, contemporaneously with the execution and recording of this Agreement, City and ACLP have recorded the Approved Plan Set as Reception No. and City and ACLP have executed and recorded the Final Plat in Plat Book at Page as Reception No. , both in the Office of the Clerk and Recorder of Pitkin County, Colorado. NOW, THEREFORE, for and in consideration of the forgoing provisions, the mutual covenants and agreements herein contained, the approval of the Application and approval and acceptance of the Approved Plan Set and the approval, execution and acceptance of the Final - Plat for recordation by the City, and for other good and valuable considerations, the receipt and sufficiency of which are hereby acknowledged, the parties hereto agree as follows: ARTICLE I PURPOSE AND EFFECT OF DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT 1.1 Purpose. The purpose of this Agreement is to set forth the complete and comprehensive understanding and agreement of the parties hereto with respect to the development of a new, replacement hotel for the existing Sky Hotel (the "Project") containing lodge, fractional ownership and affordable housing units; associated commercial uses; and a subgrade parking garage ("Subgrade Garage") on the Property, and to enumerate all terms and conditions under which such development may occur. 1.2 Effect on Prior Instruments and Approvals. It is the express intent and agreement of the parties that this Agreement, together with the Approved Plan Set and Final Plat, shall operate to vacate, terminate, and supersede all inconsistent terms and provisions of those certain previously recorded agreements, land use approvals, and plats as they may affect the Property, as more specifically defined and described in Article VII, below (collectively, the "Prior Instruments and Approvals"). City and ACLP agree to cooperate in the execution and recording of such further documents (if any) as may be determined in the future to be appropriate to evidence the vacation, termination, and superseding of any such inconsistent terms and provisions of said Prior Instruments and Approvals as they may affect the Property; provided, however, that the absence of any such execution and recording of such further documents shall in no way be construed to adversely affect, diminish or negate the vacation, termination, and superseding of any and all ofthe Prior Instruments. Furthermore, in the event of any inconsistency between the provisions ofthe land use approvals described in Section 2.1 below and the provisions of said Prior Instruments and Approvals, the provisions of the Approvals described in Section 2.1 below shall govern and control. ARTICLE II LAND USE APPROVALS 2.1 Approval Actions. The following land use approvals (the "Approvals") have been granted to ACLP for the development of the Property: (a) City Council Ordinance No 39, Series of 2014, approved October 21,2014 and recorded February 12,2015 as Reception No. 617367 granted (i) Planned Development - Page 2 of 23 Proj ect Review approval, (ii) Subdivision approval, (iii) Timeshare approval, (iv) Conceptual Commercial Design Review approval, (v) Conditional Use approval, (vi) Special Review approval, and (vii) Growth Management allotments for the Project's Site Specific Development Plan. (b) The Notice of Approval issued by the Aspen Community Development Department ("COM DEV") on July 7, 2015 July 9, 2015 at Reception Number 621405 of the Real Estate Records ofthe Clerk and Recorder of Pitkin County, Colorado, approving an Administrative Planned Development - Project Review Amendment to correct certain setbacks 4 included in Exhibit A to Ordinance 39 Series of 2014 (c) Planning and Zoning Commission Resolution No. , Series of2015, approved , 2015 and recorded , 2015 as Reception No. granted Planned Development - Detailed Review approval and Final Commercial Design Review approval for the Project. (d) The Development Order ("Development Order") for the above-described Approvals was issued by COMDEV on , 2015, with an effective date of ,2015. 2.2 Development Orders Control. The provisions ofthe above-described Approvals, including the Development Order, are incorporated herein and made a part of this Agreement. To the extent that matters addressed in such Approvals, including the Development Order, are also addressed in this Agreement, the provisions of the Approvals and the Development Order shall control. 2.3 Dimensional Requirements. Exhibit A to Ordinance No. 39, Series of 2014, established and approved the following dimensional requirements for the Project. * (a) Minimum Gross Lot Area 42,645 Sq. Ft. (b) Minimum Net Lot Area 37,113 Sq. Ft. (c) Minimum Lot Width 116 Feet (d) Minimum Front Yard Setback Above Grade 10 Feet Below Grade 5 Feet (e) Minimum East Side Yard Setback Above Grade East Wing 6.4 feet West Wing 5 feet Below Grade East Wing 5 feet West Wing 5 feet Page 3 of 23 (f) Minimum West Side Yard Setback Above Grade 13 Feet Below Grade 5 Feet (g) Minimum Rear Yard Setback Above Grade 5 Feet Below Grade 5 Feet (h) Maximum Height 40 Feet (i) Public Amenity Space 11,367 Sq. Ft. 0) Allowable Floor Area 91,327 Sq. Ft. Lodge 72,360 Sq. Ft. Commercial 3,459 Sq. Ft. Affordable Housing 1,876 Sq. Ft. Non Unit 13,632 Sq. Ft. (k) Allowable Commercial Net Leasable Area 3,480 Sq. Ft. (1) Minimum Off-Street Parking Parking Garage 54 Spaces Aspen Alps Surface Spaces 12.5 Spaces (in) Minimum Trash/Recycle Area 560 Sq. Ft. * Note: Minor changes to the Project's dimensional requirements may be approved by COMDEV provided that the resulting floor areas do not exceed that which is permitted in the Lodge zone district. 2.4 Vested Rights. Under the Development Order, the right to undertake and complete the development and use of the Property pursuant to the terms and conditions o f the Approved Plan Set for the Property is vested until , 2018, and shall not be altered, impaired, diminished or delayed by any subsequent zoning or land use action that is prohibited by Section 24-68-105(1) ofthe Colorado Revised Statutes ("CRS"). In accordance with the requirements of CRS Section 24-68-103(b), a properly noticed public hearing concerning the establishment of such vested rights for the Property was conducted on , 2015. As authorized by CRS Section 24-68-102(4)(a), City and ACLP agree that the Site Specific Development Plan for the Property consists of and includes, but is not limited to, the number, permitted size, and configuration of the Project's lodge units, fractional ownership units, affordable housing units, and parking spaces; the size and configuration of its associated commercial spaces and other areas of the Project; all matters set forth in the various Approvals referenced in Section 2.1 above; the Approved Plan Set recorded as Reception No. and the Final Plat recorded as Reception No. , all in the Office of the Clerk and Recorder of Pitkin County, Colorado; this Agreement; and all other documents recorded Page 4 of 23 concurrent herewith. For purposes of this Section 2.4, this Agreement shall be considered a "development agreement" as that term is used in CRS Section 24-68-104(2). ARTICLE III DEVELOPMENT REQUIREMENTS AND RESTRICTIONS 3.1 Project Components. The Project approved pursuant to the Approvals referenced in Section 2.1 above consists of the following principal components: (a) Lodge/Fractional Ownership Units. The Project will contain eighty- eight (88) lodge units and eleven (11) fractional ownership units. The lodge units will be configured as eighty-two (82) standard units and six (6) bunk rooms. The lodge units will contain eighty-eight (88) bedrooms and eighty-eight (88) keys. The fractional ownership units will consist of four (4) two-bedroom units and seven (7) three-bedroom units. The fractional ownership units will contain twenty-nine (29) bedrooms, of which five (5) bedrooms will be , designed as 'lock-offs", and sixteen (16) keys. Pursuant to Section 26.470.100.A. 1., Employee Generation, ofthe Regulations, the fractional ownership units' lock-offbedrooms are considered separate lodge units for regulatory purposes. As a result, the Project will contain a total of one hundred and four (104) lodge units containing a total of one hundred and four (104) keys and one hundred and seventeen (117) bedrooms. The Project's lodge/fractional ownership units will contain a total net livable area of approximately 56,509 square feet and are limited to a maximum allowable floor area of approximately 72,781 square feet. Minor changes to the Project's allowable lodge/fractional ownership floor area may be approved by COMDEV provided that the resulting floor area does not exceed that which is permitted in the Lodge zone district. (b) Commercial Net Leasable Area. The Project's commercial components will include a bar and lounge, a kitchen, a ski shop, public ski lockers, and a rooftop bar. These components are limited to a total net leasable area of 3,480 square feet and to a maximum allowable floor area of approximately 3,460 square feet. Minor changes to the Project' s allowable commercial floor area may be approved by COMDEV provided that the resulting commercial floor area does not exceed that which is permitted in the Lodge zone district. (c) Affordable Housing Units. The Project will contain one (1) one- bedroom unit and one (1) two-bedroom unit. The one-bedroom unit will contain a minimum of 750 square feet of net livable area. The two-bedroom unit will contain a minimum of 950 square feet of net livable area. The Project's affordable housing component is limited to a maximum allowable floor area of approximately 1,876 square feet of floor area. Minor changes to the Project's allowable affordable housing floor area may be approved by COMDEV provided that the resulting lodge affordable housing floor area does not exceed that which is permitted in the Lodge zone district. (d) Parking. The Project will contain fifty-four (54) off-street parking spaces in its Subgrade Garage, seven (7) of which are permitted to be stacked spaces. An additional 12.5 surface spaces will be provided for the use and benefit of the Aspen Alps 100 Building. All parking spaces in the Subgrade Garage shall be limited to the use of lodge guests, fractional ownership unit owners, affordable housing unit tenants, and users of the Project on space available basis; provided, that a maximum of thirteen (13) spaces may be made available to the 1 4 Page 5 of 23 owners of condominium units in Chateau DuMont on a space available basis as determined by the new Sky Hotel's General Manager. Each of the two affordable housing units shall be assigned a standard, non-stacked parking space in the Subgrade Garage. Long-term car parking by any user of the Subgrade Garage shall be prohibited provided that the parking of vehicles that are owned or used by the affordable housing tenants is permitted. (e) Public Amenitv Spaces. The Project will contain a total of 11,367 square feet of public amenity space, 3,430 square feet at street level, 1,367 square feet on the Project's second floor outdoor deck, and 6,575 square feet on its rooftop deck. These spaces shall remain permanently accessible to the general public via stairs and/or elevators. These spaces shall not be enclosed with temporary or permanent walls or windows, or otherwise enclosed as interior conditioned space, with the exception of the noise barriers referenced in Section 3.12, below. The rooftop public amenity space shall be subject to a public access easement, said easement to be referenced on the Final Plat. The public access easement shall be subject to the new Sky Hotel's reasonable rules and regulations governing its use by the public. 3.2 Growth Management Allotments. (a) Reconstruction Credits. Based on the existing Sky Hotel development, the Project is entitled to the following reconstruction credits pursuant to Section 26.470.040.6., Remodeling or Replacement of Existing Commercial or Lodge Development, of the Regulations: (i) A total of ninety (90) lodge bedrooms equating to one hundred and eighty (180) lodge pillows; and (ii) A commercial reconstruction credit of 5,259 square feet of net leasable area. (b) Growth Management Allotments. The following growth management allotments have been granted to the Project: (i) Twenty-seven (27) lodge bedrooms equating to fifty-four (54) lodge pillows; and 2 (ii) Two (2) affordable housing units. 3.3 Affordable Housing. (a) Mitigation Requirements. The Community Development Department - has determined that the Project will require the mitigation of 3.98 Full-Time Equivalent employees ("FTEs"). As set forth in Section 3.1(c) above, the Project will contain one (1) one- bedroom unit and one (1) two-bedroom unit which are credited with housing four (4) FTEs. (b) Special Review. Special Review approval was granted pursuant to - Ordinance 39, Series of 2015, to allow a maximum of fifty (50) percent of the finished floor of the affordable housing units to be located below finished grade. (c) Affordable Housing Conditions. The Project's two affordable housing units shall be deed restricted to the Aspen/Pitkin County Housing Authority's ("APCHA") Category 3 income and occupancy guidelines, and shall meet the following conditions: Page 6 of 23 (i) The affordable housing units shall meet or exceed the minimum - net livable area requirements for Category 3 units; (ii) The deed restriction for the affordable housing units shall be recorded prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy ("CO") for the units. The CO for the affordable housing units shall be issued at the same time or prior to the CO for the lodge units and associated commercial space; (iii) All tenants shall be approved by APCHA prior to occupancy; (iv) Employees ofthe Project residing within the on-site affordable housing units shall be exempt from APCHA's maximum asset and income limitations provided, however, that such tenants work full time and do not own any other property within APCHA' s ownership exclusion zone, both as defined in the APCHA Guidelines; (v) Minimum occupancy requirements shall be maintained for each unit as defined in the APCHA Guidelines; (Vi) The units shall not remain vacant for more than forty-five (45) days unless APCHA is notified as to why a unit has been left vacant; (vii) A washer and dryer shall be provided in each affordable housing unit; (viii) Each affordable housing unit shall be assigned one (1) parking space in the Subgrade Garage. The parking spaces shall not be stacked; and (ix) The affordable housing units shall be rental units. The Project's Condominium Declaration shall contain language, to be reviewed and approved by APCHA, that in the event the units become ownership units: â€¢ They will be sold through the lottery system; â€¢ The dues will be based on the assessed value of the deed restricted units versus the fractional ownership units as well as the square footage ofthe units; â€¢ No common expenses will be charged to the deed restricted owners unless approved by APCHA; and â€¢ A separate homeowners association shall be created for the deed restricted affordable housing units. 3.4 Condominium Declaration and Map/Timeshare Documents. The Project's fractional ownership units will be condominiumized and sold pursuant to a fractional ownership plan to be defined and described in the Condominium Declaration for the Project (the "Declaration") to be recorded in the Office of the Clerk and Recorder of Pitkin County, Colorado contemporaneously with the recording of the Condominium Map therefor. The Condominium Declaration and Condominium Map, and the Project's Timeshare Documents, shall be submitted to COMDEV for review and approval upon substantial completion of construction and prior to issuance of a CO for the Project. Page 7 of 23 (a) The Condominium Map shall comply with the provisions of Section 26.480.050.A., Condominiumization, of the Regulations. The Condominium Map shall depict a non-exclusive easement for ingress and egress across the easterly portion of the Property between Durant Avenue and the alley in Block 107 for the use and benefit of the Chateau Chaumont and Chateau DuMont Condominiums. (b) The Project's Timeshare Documents shall contain a requirement assuring that unused fractional ownership units will be available for rent to the general public, and that the rental requirement cannot be eliminated from the Declaration without the approval of the City Council. Periodic audits, pursuant to Section 26.575.210, Lodge Occupancy Auditing, ofthe Regulations may be conducted by the City. (c) The applicable requirements and restrictions of Section 26.590, Timeshare Development, ofthe Regulations, shall be incorporated in the Project's Timeshare Documents. The requirements and restrictions shall include, but are not limited to: (i) State requirements; (ii) Owner occupancy limitations and disclosure of the public rental requirement described in Section 3.4(b) above; (iii) Provisions for reserve funds for ongoing maintenance; (iv) Prohibited practices and uses; (v) Limits on marketing techniques; (vi) A prohibition against long-term parking of owners' vehicles; and (vii) A prohibition of offering non-Aspen gifts within a marketing plan. 3.5 Construction in Accordance with Building Codes and Plans. Construction of the Project, and all its component parts, shall be accomplished in substantial compliance with adopted City building and accessibility codes in effect at the time a Building Permit application is submitted, and with the Approved Plan Set. The elevator access to the Project's rooftop amenities shall meet International Building Code accessibility requirements. The ground floor affordable housing units shall be provided with a compliant circulation path within the Property that connects the units to the Subgrade Garage and the public right-of-way. 3.6 Engineering Department Requirements. The Project shall comply with all sections of Title 21, Streets, Sidewalks and Other Public Places, of the Aspen Municipal Code, and all construction and excavation standards published by the Engineering Department. (a) Drainage. The Project shall meet the requirements of the City's Urban , Runoff Management Plan. A compliant drainage plan, including a 100-year mudflow analysis, shall be submitted with the building permit application for the Project. (b) Excavation Stabilization. Due to the Project's proximity to neighboring properties, an excavation stabilization plan shall be submitted to the Engineering Department prior to building permit submittal. Page 8 of 23 (c) Traffic Flow. Traffic flow in the adjacent alley in Block 107 shall remain as currently signed with entry from Durant Avenue and exit onto Original Street. Pedestrian traffic within the alley shall be distinguished from vehicular traffic. (d) Construction Management Plan. (i) The building permit application for the Project shall include a Construction Management Plan ("CMP") for review and approval by the Engineering Department. The CMP shall comply with all construction management requirements in effect at the time of building permit submittal, and shall address, at a minimum, noise, construction traffic and parking management, construction staging, and fugitive dust control. (ii) ACLP shall work with neighboring properties, including the Chateau Chaumont and Chateau DuMont ("Neighbors"), to obtain their input in the preparation of the CMP prior to its submittal to the City. The CMP shall include the appointment of a specific construction team person as contact for all questions and suggestions by Neighbors regarding the construction process. Neighbors desire uninterrupted access to the units and parking spaces within their condominiums. ACLP shall use good faith efforts to minimize interruption for access for condominium owners and guests to the units and parking spaces within the condominiums. ACLP shalllimit the most disruptive alley work directly in front of the Neighbors' condominium buildings to April 15 through June 15 and October 1 through November 20 of each year. The specific hours and details for access shall be determined in the CMP. In recognition of the fact that the Neighbors' properties are immediately adjacent and very near the Project, the CMP shall provide for real and significant noise and dust control measures. For example, watering exposed areas as reasonably necessary to suppress dust during all times of excavation, and the provision of physical sound barriers between the construction site and the Neighbors' properties to be erected prior to commencement of excavation and construction activities in order to mitigate sound impacts. These neighborhood measures are intended to augment rather than supersede City of Aspen construction regulations. 3.7 Water Department Requirements. The project shall comply with the City's Water System Standards, with Title 25, Utilities, and the applicable requirements of Title 8, Buildings and Building Regulations, of the Aspen Muncipal Code, as required by the Water Department. All water System Distribution Standards in place at the time of building permit submittal shall apply, and all tap fees will be assessed per applicable codes and standards. 3.8 Aspen Consolidated Sanitation District Requirements. Sanitary sewer service is contingent upon compliance with the Aspen Consolidated Sanitation District's ("ACSD") rules, regulations and specifications which are on file at the ACSD office. (a) ACSD shall review the Project's approved drainage plans to assure that no clear water connections, including roof, foundation, perimeter and patio drains, are made to the sanitary sewer system. (b) On-site sanitary sewer utility plans require ACSD approval. Permanent improvements are prohibited in sewer easements or right-of-ways. Landscaping plans will require ACSD approval where soft and hard landscaping may impact public right-of-ways or easements to be dedicated to the District. Page 9 of 23 (c) Old services lines must be excavated and abandoned at the main sanitary sewer line in accordance with specific ACSD requirements and prior to micropiling. Soil nails are prohibited in right-of-ways. One tap is allowed for each building. Shared service line agreements may be required where more than one unit is served by a single service line. (d) Below grade development may require installation of a pumping system. Above grade development shall flow by gravity. (e) Plumbing plans for pool and spa areas require ACSD approval of the drain - size. Glycol snowmelt and heating systems must have containment provisions and must preclude discharge to the public sanitary sewer system. (f) Oil and grease interceptors are required for all new and remodeled food processing establishments. Oil and sand separators are required for public vehicle parking garages and vehicle maintenance facilities. Driveway entrance drains shall not be routed to ACSD's sanitary sewer system but shall be mitigated in accordance with the City's Urban Runoff Management Plan. Elevator shaft drains must flow thru oil and sand interceptors. Plans for interceptors, separators and containment facilities require ACSD review and approval prior to building permit submittal. (g) Where additional development would produce flows that would exceed the planned reserve capacity of the existing system (collection system and/or treatment system), an additional proportionate fee will be assessed to eliminate the downstream collection system or treatment capacity constraint. Additional proportionate fees would be collected over time from all development in the area of concern to fund the needed improvements. (h) Where additional development would produce flows that would overwhelm the planned capacity of the existing collection system and/or treatment facility, the development will be assessed fees to cover the cost of replacing the entire portion ofthe system that would be overwhelmed. ACSD would fund the cost of constructing reserve capacity in the area of concern (only for the material cost difference for large line). (i) ACLP shall provide average and peak flow data as well as service size prior to final design. ACSD will be able to respond with more specific comments and requirements once detailed building and utility plans are available. All ACSD total connection fees must be paid prior to issuance of a building permit. 0) Amendments to the above requirements agreed to in writing by ACLP and ACSD shall supersede the sanitation requirements listed above. 3.9 Environmental Health Department Requirements. (a) Environmental Health Codes. The State of Colorado mandates specific mitigation requirements with regard to asbestos. Additional code requirements to be aware of when filing a building permit include (i) a prohibition against engine idling, (ii) regulation of fireplaces, (iii) fugitive dust requirements, (iv) noise abatement, and (v) pool design. Page 10 of 23 (b) Trash Requirements. The Project's trash enclosures shall meet the minimum requirements outlined in Title 12, Solid Waste, of the Aspen Municipal Code. Trash removal and deliveries shall be provided from the alley in Block 107 as depicted on the Approved Plan Set. (c) Deliveries and Trash Removal. All deliveries and trash removal to and from the Project shall occur between the hours of 8:00 AM and 7:00 PM except under the following circumstances: (i) Heavy snowfalls, acts of God, and force majeure; (ii) Food & Wine, in which case, for three (3) days prior to the event, the above timelines may be exceeded to include the following hours: 7:00 AM to 10:00 PM; (iii) X-Games, in which case, for three (3) days prior to the event, the above timelines may be exceeded to include the following hours: 7:00 AM to 10:00 PM; (iv) Christmas, in which case, for three (3) days prior to Christmas Eve, the above timelines may be exceeded to include the following hours: 7:00 AM to 10:00 PM; and (v) New Years, in which case, for three (3) days prior to New Year's Eve, the above timelines may be exceeded to include the following hours: 7:00 AM to 10:00 PM. ACLP shall schedule deliveries and trash removal so that the Alley in Block 107 is not unreasonably blocked by service vehicles, whether parked or waiting for other service vehicles to vacate the service bays. There shall be no unreasonable parking or idling of delivery or service vehicles in the access easement area between Durant Avenue and the Alley in Block 107. The requirements of Section 3.9(c) above shall take effect upon the issuance of a final and unconditional CO for the Project. 3.10 Transportation Department Requirements. ACLP shall implement the TDM and MMLOS measures contained in the Transportation Impact Analysis attached hereto as Exhibit B. 3.11 Parks Department Requirements. (a) Tree removal permits are required prior to issuance of a building permit for any demolition or significant site work. Mitigation for tree removal shall be met by a cash- in-lieu payment, by on-site plantings, or a combination ofboth as provided for in Title 13, Chapter 13.20, Tree Removal Permits, of the Aspen Municipal Code. Rooftop plantings shall not qualify as mitigation. (b) A tree protection plan depicting the drip lines of each individual tree or group of trees which is to remain on the Property shall be included in the building permit submittal for any demolition or significant site work. The plan shall depict the location of tree protection zones which shall be approved by the City Forester. The plan shall prohibit excavation; the storage of building materials, construction and equipment; and access over or through the protection zones by foot or vehicles. Page 11 of 23 3.12 Noise Requirements. (a) ACLP shall install a sound system to accommodate the acoustic needs of day-to-day operations as well as special events. Outside events shall be prohibited from bringing in their own sound equipment, unless approved by the City through a Temporary Use Approval or Special Event Permit. Noise levels shall meet City requirements at all times. ACLP shall explore an engineered solution that does not require additional sound barriers. If an engineered solution is not achievable, removable transparent panels of no more than four and one-half (4.5) feet in height (measured from the point of attachment) shall be permitted on the new Sky Hotel' s second floor and rooftop decks to help abate noise. The panels shall be removed within 24 hours following an event. In the event the removable panels are required for back-to-back events, they may be up for no longer than seven (7) continuous days. ACLP shall meet with representatives from the COMDEV and the City's Environmental Health Department prior to submission ofthe main building permit for the Project to review engineered solution options and evaluate the need for the noise barriers referenced herein. (b) The new Sky Hotel shall comply with all of the time and decibel levels requirements contained in Title 18, Noise Abatement, as the same may be amended from time to time. Notwithstanding the limitations of Title 18, the decibel level at the property line between the new Sky Hotel and the adjacent real property legally described in deed recorded as Reception Number 382365 of the Real Estate Records of the Clerk and Recorder of Pitkin County, Colorado, as measured by the City' s Enforcement Officer, shall not exceed sixty (60) - dB-A; and the decibel level at the property line between the new Sky hotel and Neighbors shall not exceed sixty (60) dB-A measured from the southwest corner of the Chateau Chaumont property Line and the southwest corner o f the third floor courtyard balcony of the Chateau Chaumont condominium In both cases, such measurements shall be made using a sound level meter with the "A" weighted scale, set on "Slow" response at any there is activity on the rooftop of the new Sky Hotel. The noise level shall be assessed by taking numerous measurements over a number of minutes, and averaging the readings. The sound level meters must meet Type 2 specifications, according to ANSI S 1.4-2014 (or most current edition), and the sound level meter should be checked prior to measurements with a field calibrator. The noise measured must actually originate from the new Sky Hotel. Any measurement shall take into account and consider other background noises as required by Title 18 at the time of the event and measurement. (c) All activity (except for the limited purposes of cleaning and removal of sound barriers) on the roof top areas of the new Sky Hotel shall cease at the earlier of 10:00 p.m. or the time or the time provided in City's regulations for the cessation of outdoor amplified music unless a Special Event Permit is obtained from the City by the new Sky Hotel. There shall be no more than fifteen (15) Special Events per year for which ACLP or the new Sky Hotel applies to the City for activity on the roof top areas, and in no case shall Special Event activity on the roof top continue beyond 11:00 p.m. on any night. Provided, however, removal of sound barriers may be permitted to take place after the conclusion of any Special Event. Sound barriers will be limited to the areas on the Approved Plan Set. The requirements of this Section 3.12 shall take effect upon the issuance of the Final and Unconditional CO for the new Sky Hotel. 3.13 Fire Mitigation. The Project shall comply with all codes adopted by the Aspen Fire Protection District. This includes, but is not limited to, access (International Fire Code, 2003 Page 12 of 23 Edition, Section 503), approved fire sprinkler, and fire alarm systems (International Fire Code, as amended, Sections 903 and 907). The Subgrade Garage shall have adequate fire access which shall be reviewed and approved by the City's Fire Marshall. 3.14 Outdoor Lighting and Signage. All outdoor lighting shall meet the requirements of Section 26.575.150, Outdoor Lighting, of the Regulations. 3.15 Material Representations. All material representations and commitments made by ACLP in connection with the Project's development approvals contained or referenced herein, whether made in public hearings or in documentation presented before the Aspen Planning and Zoning Commission or the Aspen City Council, are hereby expressly incorporated in said Project's development approvals and such representations and commitments shall be complied with by ACLP as if fully set forth herein, unless amended by an authorized entity. 3.16 School Land Dedication Fee. Before a building permit is issued for the Project, ACLP shall pay to City a cash payment in lieu of school land dedication for the Project' s two affordable housing units in an amount to be determined at building permit issuance based on the regulations in effect at that time. 3.17 Park Development Impact Fee. Before a building permit is issued for the Project, ACLP shall pay to City a Park Development Impact Fee, for the Project's lodge and affordable housing components in an amount to be determined at building permit issuance based on the regulations in effect at that time. No impact fee is required for the Project's net leasable commercial square footage as no net new commercial square footage is proposed. 3.18 Air Oualitv Impact Fee. Before a building permit is issued for the Project, ACLP shall pay to City an Air Quality Impact Fee in an amount to be determined at building permit issuance based on the regulations in effect at that time. No impact fee is required for the Project's net leasable commercial square footage as no net new commercial square footage is proposed. 3.19 Effectiveness of Ordinance No. 4, Series of 2015. The Project shall be subject to the provisions of Ordinance No. 4, Series of 2015. ARTICLE IV PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS 4.1 Prior to issuance of a final CO for the Project, ACLP shall accomplish certain public improvements, all as depicted on the recorded Approved Plan Set, including the following: (a) Landscape Improvements. See Exhibit C attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference. (b) Public Infrastructure Improvements. See Exhibit D attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference. (c) Storm Water and Drainage Improvements. See Exhibit E attached - hereto and incorporated herein by this reference. Page 13 of 23 ARTICLE V FINANCIAL ASSURANCES 5.1 Site Protection/Enhancements Requirements. (a) Site Protection Guarantee. Before the issuance of a Building Permit for the Project, ACLP shall deposit with Pitkin County Title, Inc. ("Escrow Agent") the sum of $ in the form of cash or wired funds (the "Escrow Funds") and will execute an Escrow Agreement and Instructions with the Escrow Agent which recites as follows: In the event construction work on the Project shall cease for 90 days or longer ("Work Stoppage") prior to a final inspection by the City of the work authorized by a foundation/structural frame permit and cessation of such construction work continues for a period of one hundred twenty (120) days after notice from the City to ACLP specifying the subject work in reasonable detail, or if such Work Stoppage cannot reasonably be cured within such one hundred twenty (120) day period and ACLP fails to commence and proceed diligently to cure such Work Stoppage within a reasonable time period, then the City, in its reasonable discretion, may draw upon the Escrow Funds from time to time as needed for the purposes of improving the appearance of any construction work not already completed and if reasonably necessary, protecting and securing the Project site and improvements from damage by the elements and/or from trespass by unauthorized persons and for purposes of improving the Project site to a safe condition such that it does not become an attractive nuisance or otherwise pose a threat to neighbors or other persons. The City shall use commercially reasonable efforts to not adversely impact the operation of, or access to the Project. The Escrow Funds or any remaining balance thereof shall be returned to ACLP upon completion by the City of a final inspection of the work authorized by the Foundation/Structural Frame Permit on the Project; provided, however, that the Community Development Director shall promptly authorize partial releases, in increments of no less than 25% ofthe original surety, ofthe Site Protection Guarantee as portions of the Proj ect protection, security, and safety are reduced. The City shall be a named party to the Escrow Agreement with the express right and authority to enforce the same from time to time. (b) Site Enhancement Guarantee. Before the issuance of a Building Permit for the Project, ACLP shall deposit with Pitkin County Title, Inc. ("Escrow Agent") the sum of $ in the form of cash or wired funds (the "Escrow Funds") and will execute an Escrow Agreement and Instructions with the Escrow Agent which recites as follows: In the event construction work on the Project shall cease for 90 days or longer ("Work Stoppage") prior to a final inspection by the City of the work authorized by any permit or phase of permit for the Project and cessation of such construction work continues for a period of one hundred twenty (120) days after notice from the City to ACLP specifying the subject work in reasonable detail, or if such Work Stoppage cannot reasonably be cured within such one hundred twenty (120) day period and ACLP fails to commence and proceed diligently to cure such Work Stoppage within a reasonable time period, then the Page 14 of 23 City, in its reasonable discretion, may draw upon the Escrow Funds from time to time as needed for the purposes of improving the appearance of any construction work not already completed on the Project site and for installing any public improvements on or adjacent to the Project site. The City shall use commercially reasonable discretion with respect to the manner or improving the appearance of construction work in progress as well as determining the public improvements to be installed. The City shall use commercially reasonable efforts to not adversely impact the operation of, or access to the Project. The Escrow Funds or any remaining balance thereof shall be returned to ACLP upon completion by the City of a final inspection ofthe work authorized by the Foundation/Structural Frame Permit on the Project; provided, however, that the Community Development Director shall promptly authorize partial releases, in increments of no less than 25% of the original surety, of the Site Enhancement Guarantee as portions of the Project pertaining to its appearance, or the installing any public improvements on or adjacent to the Project are substantially performed. The City shall be a named party to the Escrow Agreement with the express right and authority to enforce the same from time to time. 5.2 Performance Guarantees. 5.2.1 Public Improvements. a. Public Improvements Itemized. (i) Landscape Improvements are itemized on Exhibit C attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference. (ii) Public Infrastructure Improvements are itemized on Exhibit D attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference. (iii) Storm Water and Drainage Improvements are itemized on Exhibit E attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference. b. Security for Improvements. Simultaneously with the full execution by the City and ACLP of this Agreement, ACLP shall deposit with Pitkin County Title, Inc ("Escrow Agent") cash funds in the total amount of $ ("Escrow Funds") as security for the completion of the Public Improvements ("Improvements") itemized on Exhibits C, D & E attached hereto. It is further agreed that Escrow Funds described above shall constitute the total of all security required for all the Improvements which ACLP is required to perform. For purposes hereof"Substantially Complete" or "Substantial Completion" shall mean that the City has inspected the Improvements and has reasonably determined that they are Substantially Complete in compliance with applicable specifications and has issued a Certificate of Substantial Completion or similarly intended form of approval. Subject to provisions below in section 5.2.1 (c) including, without limitation, partial release provisions, the Escrow Funds representing the cost of part or all ofthe Improvements (as itemized on Exhibit C, D, or E) which are Substantially Complete shall be immediately released to ACLP. Ifthere is any balance remaining in the Escrow Funds after all partial releases and all Improvements t are Substantially Complete, all such remaining funds shall be promptly released to ACLP upon delivery of written notice to Escrow Agent by ACLP directing such delivery. Page 15 of 23 c. Escrow Release Provisions. Upon delivery by ACLP of written notice that the Improvements or any part or parts thereof are complete and ready for inspection ("Request for Inspection") along with a showing of the value of the Improvements or part(s) thereof completed, the City will, within 14 days, inspect the Improvements identified in the Request for Inspection, to determine whether or not such Improvements are Substantially Complete. If the City finds that the Improvements identified in the Request for Inspection are Substantially Complete, the City shall, within 7 days, deliver a written Certificate of Substantial Completion to ACLP and Escrow Agent. Upon receipt of a Certificate of Substantial Completion for Improvements identified in the Request for Inspection, the Escrow Agent shall immediately release to ACLP the total itemized amount (Per Exhibit C, D, or E) corresponding to all Improvements which the City has certified as Substantially Complete. Pursuant to Section 26.445.070(C)(4) of the Land Use Code, ten percent (10%) ofthe value o f the Improvement(s) set forth in the City's Certification of Substantial Completion shall be retained by the Escrow Agent. After any and all partial releases, and once all remaining Improvements, if any, are Substantially Complete, the 10% retained shall be immediately released by Escrow Agent to ACLP. If the cost to Substantially Complete the Improvements, or part(s) thereof is less than the corresponding amount itemized in each of Exhibits C, D & E attached hereto, if and the City certifies that such Improvements, or part (s) thereof are Substantially Complete, the Escrow Agent shall immediately release to ACLP the total itemized amount (Per Exhibit C, D, or E) corresponding to all Improvements which the City has certified as Substantially Complete minus the 10% required to be withheld pursuant to Section 26.445.070(C)(4) ofthe Land Use Code. If the City finds that all or a portion of the Improvements identified in the Request for Inspection are not Substantially Complete, the City shall furnish a letter of potential deficiencies to ACLP and Escrow Agent within fourteen (14) days of such finding. Any such letter of potential deficiencies shall specify which Improvements identified in the Request for Inspection are potentially deficient. If a letter o f potential deficiencies is issued which specifies a portion of the Improvements identified in the Request for Inspection as potentially deficient, then all Improvements identified in such Request for Inspection which are not specified as being potentially deficient shall automatically be deemed Substantially Complete without requirement of any further action. ACLP need only provide written notice to Escrow Agent with a copy to the City that the Improvements not specified in the letter of potential deficiencies are Substantially Complete. Such notice to Escrow Agent shall be deemed the equivalent of a Certificate of Substantial Completion from the City and upon receipt of such notice, Escrow Agent is authorized to immediately release to ACLP the total itemized amount (Per Exhibit C, D, or E) corresponding to all Improvements which the City has certified as Substantially Complete minus the 10% withholding as per Section 26.445.070(C)(4) of the Land Use Code. If no letter of potential deficiency is furnished within the said fourteen (14) day period, all Improvements identified in the Request for Inspection shall automatically be deemed Substantially Complete without requirement of any further action. ACLP need only provide written notice to Escrow Agent, with a copy to the City that no letter of potential deficiency was provided as required hereunder. Such notice to Escrow Agent shall be deemed the equivalent of a Certificate of Substantial Completion from the City and upon receipt of such notice, Escrow Agent is Page 16 of 23 authorized to promptly release to ACLP the total itemized amount (Per Exhibit C, D, or E) corresponding to all Improvements which the City has certified as Substantially Complete minus the 10% withholding as per Section 26.445.070(C)(4) ofthe Land Use Code With respect to any Improvements identified in the Request for Inspection that are specified as potentially deficient in a letter o f potential deficiencies as provided hereunder, ACLP shall have a reasonable period oftime to cure any such potential deficiencies. After performing cure measures, ACLP shall submit to the City a Request for Inspection, along with a showing of the cost of the Improvements completed. The City will, within 14 days, inspect the Improvements previously identified as potentially deficient to determine whether or not such Improvements have been made Substantially Complete. If the City reasonably finds that the Improvements previously identified as potentially deficient have been made Substantially Complete, the City shall, within 7 days, deliver a Certificate of Substantial Completion to ACLP and Escrow Agent. In such event, Escrow Agent shall release to ACLP within 5 days, the total itemized amount (Per Exhibit C, D, or E) corresponding to all Improvements which the City has certified as Substantially Complete minus the 10% withholding as per Section 26.445.070(C)(4) of the Land Use Code. If the City fails to respond to ACLP Request for Inspection regarding cure measures taken as to previously identified potentially deficient Improvements within such 7 day period, all such Improvements identified in the Request for Inspection shall automatically be deemed Substantially Complete. ACLP need only provide written notice to Escrow Agent, with a copy to the City that no letter of potential deficiency was provided as required hereunder. Such notice to Escrow Agent shall be deemed the equivalent of a Certificate of Substantial Completion from the City and upon receipt of such notice, Escrow Agent is authorized to promptly release to ACLP the total itemized amount (Per Exhibit C, D, or E) corresponding to all Improvements which the City has certified as Substantially Complete minus the 10% withholding as per Section 26.445.070(C)(4) ofthe Land Use Code. If the City reasonably finds that the Improvements previously identified as potentially deficient have not been made Substantially Complete then City and ACLP shall have 14 days after the date of the City' s finding, to reach written resolution regarding the Improvements determined by the City to be potentially deficient. If ACLP and the City are not able to reach resolution within such 14 day period then the City and ACLP agree to submit the dispute to the Board of Appeals and Examiners ofthe City of Aspen (hereinafter referred to as "Board"). The Board shall base its decision upon substantial evidence presented. The Board's finding would be subject to review pursuant to C.R.C.P. Rule 106(a)(4) in accordance with the laws ofthe State of Colorado. If ACLP has not applied to the District Court for review of the determination of the Board within that time set forth pursuant to C.R.C.P. 106(a)(4) and has not obtained a Certificate of Substantial Completion City regarding the potentially deficient Improvements within such time or such additional time as may be reasonably needed by ACLP under the circumstances, the City may cause the potentially deficient Improvements to be Substantially Complete and the costs of making the potentially deficient Improvements Substantially Complete shall be paid from the Escrow Funds; provided, however, that in so doing, the City's expenses shall be commercially reasonable. Ifthe City's costs are less than the itemized amounts for such Improvements (Per Exhibit C, D or E) the difference remaining shall be promptly paid to ACLP. Page 17 of 23 If the Board finds that the City's determination was correct, then ACLP shall have the right to take such corrective action as may be reasonably necessary to correct the Improvements found by the Board to be potentially deficient. Upon completion of such corrective action, ACLP will submit to the City a Request for Inspection. If the City determines that Improvements found by the Board to be potentially deficient have been made Substantially Complete then the City shall, within 7 days, deliver a Certificate of Substantial Completion to ACLP and Escrow Agent. In such event, Escrow Agent shall release to ACLP within five (5) days, the total itemized amount (Per Exhibit C, D, or E) corresponding to all Improvements which the City has certified as Substantially Complete minus the 10% withholding as per Section 26.445.070(C)(4) of the Land Use Code.. If the City determines that Improvements found by the Board to be potentially deficient remain potentially deficient then the City may cause such potentially deficient Improvements to be Substantially Complete and the costs of making such potentially deficient Improvements Substantially Complete shall be paid from the Escrow Funds; provided, however, that in so doing, the City's expenses shall be commercially reasonable. If the City's costs are less than the itemized amounts for such Improvements (Per Exhibit C, D or E) the difference remaining shall be promptly paid to ACLP. In the event the Board finds in favor of ACLP, then the Improvements in issue shall automatically be deemed Substantially Complete without requirement o f any further action. ACLP need only provide written notice to Escrow Agent, with a copy to the City that the Board found in favor of ACLP. Such notice to Escrow Agent shall be deemed the equivalent of a Certificate of Substantial Completion from the Board. Upon receipt of such notice, Escrow Agent is authorized to immediately release to ACLP the total itemized amount (Per Exhibit C, D, or E) corresponding to all Improvements which the City has certified as Substantially Complete minus the 10% withholding as per Section 26.445.070(C)(4) ofthe Land Use Code. If there are delays in performance hereunder due to abnormal adverse weather conditions, acts of God, casualties or any causes beyond the control of ACLP or the City, or by other causes which reasonably would justify delay, then the affected time period or deadline shall be extended for a reasonable period of time, as may be agreed upon by the parties. No agreement to extend may be unreasonably withheld or delayed. It is the express understanding of the parties that compliance with the procedure set forth in Article VI below pertaining to the procedure for default and amendment of this Agreement shall be required with respect to the enforcement and implementation of the financial assurances and guarantees to be provided by ACLP as set forth above; provided, however that all procedures and requirements of this Article V shall be exhausted by the City before any action under Article VI below is taken by the City with regard to matters pertaining to this Article V. ARTICLE VI NON-COMPLIANCE AND REQUEST FOR AMENDMENTS OR EXTENSIONS In the event that the City determines that ACLP is not acting in substantial compliance with the terms of this Agreement, the City shall notify ACLP in writing specifying the alleged non-compliance and asking that ACLP remedy the alleged non- compliance within such reasonable time as the City may determine, but not less than 30 days. If the City determines that ACLP has not complied within such time, the City may issue and serve upon ACLP a written order specifying the alleged non-compliance Page 18 of 23 and requiring ACLP to remedy the same within thirty (30) days. Within twenty (20) days of the receipt of such order, ACLP may file with the City Council either a notice advising the City that it is in compliance or a written request to determine any one or both of the following matters: (a) Whether the alleged non-compliance exists or did exist, or (b) Whether a variance, extension of time or amendment to this Agreement should be granted with respect to any such non-compliance which is determined to exist. Upon the receipt of such request, the City shall promptly schedule a meeting of the parties to consider the matters set forth in the order of non-compliance. The meeting of the parties shall be convened and conducted pursuant to the procedures normally established by the City. If the City determines that a non-compliance exists which has not been remedied, it may issue such orders as may be appropriate, including the imposition of daily fines until such non-compliance has been remedied, the withholding of permits and/or certificate of occupancy, as applicable; provided, however, no order shall terminate any land use approval. The City may also grant such variances, extensions of time or amendments to this Agreement as it may deem appropriate under the circumstances. In addition to the foregoing, ACLP may, on its own initiative, petition the City for a variance, an amendment to this Agreement or an extension of one or more of the time periods required for performance hereunder. The City may grant such variances, amendments to this Agreement, or extensions of time as it may deem appropriate under the circumstances. The parties expressly acknowledge and agree that the City shall not unreasonably refuse to extend the time periods for performance hereunder if ACLP demonstrates that the reasons for the delay(s) which necessitate said extension(s) result from acts of God or other events beyond the reasonable control of ACLP, despite good faith efforts on its part to perform in a timely manner. ARTICLE VII PRIOR INSTRUMENTS AND APPROVALS 7.1 Prior Instruments and Approvals. a. Encroachment License between City o f Aspen and the Captain's Anchorage Inc., book 316 at page 232. b. Encroachment License Agreement between City of Aspen and Cantrup, book 425 at page 907. c. Encroachment License Agreement between City of Aspen and Cantrup, book 425 at page 913. d. Encroachment License Agreement between City of Aspen and Cantrup, book 425 at page 919. Page 19 of 23 e. Encroachment Agreement between City of Aspen and Richard Butera, book 498 at page 909. f. Agreement between the Glory Hole owners and the City of Aspen, book 325, page 939. g. Parking lot lease between Cantrup, Resort Hotel Development Inc., ("Resort") and Woodstone Inn Associates Inc, book 441, page 811. h. Statement of Exception From the Full Subdivision Process for the purpose of condominiumization recorded in book 441 at page 811. i. Condominium Declaration for the Woodstone Inn recorded in book 441 at page 814 j. Condominium Map ofthe subject property in plat book 14 at page 45. k. Agreement between the City of Aspen and Woodstone Associates, book 484 at 444. 1. Statement of Variances, book 556 at page 866, book 559 at page 909, and book 559 at page 911. m. Any and all agreements, approvals, ordinances, resolutions, and similar instruments not specifically listed above (recorded or unrecorded) which could be construed to adversely affect, negate, or otherwise diminish the Approved Plan Set, Final Plat, this Agreement, any amendments to any of the foregoing, and any and all agreements or instruments made or given in connection with any of the foregoing. ARTICLE VIII GENERAL PROVISIONS 8.1 The provisions hereof shall be binding upon and inure to the benefit of ACLP and City and their respective successors and assigns. 8.2 This Agreement shall be subj ect to and construed in accordance with the laws of the State of Colorado. 8.3 If any of the provisions of this Agreement or any paragraph, sentence, clause, phrase, word, or section or the application thereof in any circumstance is invalidated, such invalidity shall not affect the validity of the remainder of this Agreement, and the application of any such provision, paragraph, sentence, clause, phrase, word, or section in any other circumstance shall not be affected thereby. 8.4 This Agreement and the exhibits attached hereto contain the entire understanding between the parties hereto with respect to the transactions contemplated hereunder. ACLP, its successors or assigns, may, on its own initiative, petition the City Council for an amendment to this Agreement or for an extension of one or more of the time periods required for performance hereunder. The City Council shall not unreasonably deny such petition for amendment or extension after considering all Page 20 of 23 appropriate circumstances. Any such amendments or extensions of time shall only become effective upon the execution by all parties hereto that are affected by the proposed amendment. 8.5 Numerical and title headings contained in this Agreement are for convenience only, and shall not be deemed determinative of the substance contained herein. As used herein, where the context requires, the use of the singular shall include the plural and the use of any gender shall include all genders. 8.6 Upon execution of this Agreement by all parties hereto, City agrees to approve and execute the Final Plat and to approve the Approved Plan Set and to accept the same for recordation in the Office of the Clerk and Recorder of Pitkin County, Colorado, upon payment of the recordation fees by ACLP. 8.7 Notices to be given to the parties to this Agreement shall be considered to be given if hand delivered or if deposited in the United States Mail to the parties by certified mail, return receipt requested, or when sent via facsimile transmission, at the addresses indicated below, or such other addresses as may be substituted upon written notice by the parties or their successors or assigns: CITY: City of Aspen City Manager 130 South Galena Street Aspen, CO 81611 (Fax No. ) ACLP: Aspen Club Lodge Properties, LLC c/o Northridge Capital, LLC 1101 30the Street, NW, Suite 150 Washington, DC 20007 (Fax No. ) With Copy to: 8.8 This Agreement may be executed in counterparts, in which case all such counterparts together shall constitute one and the same instrument which is binding on all of the parties thereto, notwithstanding that all of the parties are not signatory to the original or the same counterpart. Facsimile and email signatures shall be treated as original signatures hereon. 8.9 The terms, conditions, provisions and obligations herein contained shall be deemed covenants that run with and burden the Property and any and all owners Page 21 of 23 thereof or interests therein, their respective successors, grantees or assigns, and further shall inure to the benefit of and be specifically enforceable by or against the parties hereto, their respective successors, grantees or assigns. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have hereunto set their hands and seals as of the day and year first above written. CITY: CITY OF ASPEN, COLORADO, a Colorado municipal corporation By: Steve Skadron, Mayor Attest: City Clerk APPROVED AS TO FORM: James True, City Attorney ACLP: ASPEN CLUB LODGE PROPERTIES, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company By: STATE OF COLORADO ) ) SS. COUNTY OF PITKIN ) The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this day of , 2015, by Steve Skadron as Mayor and as City Clerk of the City of Aspen, Colorado, a municipal corporation. Witness my hand and official seal. My commission expires: Notary Public Page 22 of 23 STATE OF COLORADO ) ) SS. COUNTY OF ) The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this day of ,2015, by as of Aspen Club Lodge Properties, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company. Witness my hand and official seal. My commission expires: Notary Public Page 23 of 23 EXHIBIT "A" LEGAL DESCRIPTION PARCELI WOODSTONE INN CONDOMINIUMS, according to the Condominium Map thereof filed March 11, 1983 in Plat Book 14 at Page 45 through 49, inclusive, at Reception No. 248609 and as further defined and described in the Condominium Declaration for Woodstone Inn Condominiums recorded March 11, 1983 in Book 441 at Page 814 at Reception No. 248608. PARCELII A non-exclusive easement and right-of-way for the purpose of ingress and egress over and across that certain parcel described in Long Form Easement Agreement unrecorded, notice of which is given by Short Form Easement Agreement recorded April 25, 1977 in Book 327 at Page 777. PARCEL 111 Encroachment License Agreements for the purposes stated therein recorded September 3, 1976 in Book 316 at Page 232, April 30,1982 in Book 425 at Page 907, in Book 425 at Page 913, in Book 425 at Page 919 and recorded November 13, 1985 in Book 498 at Page 909. 2 ~. Legal Tabs Co. 1-800-322-3022 * Stock # DO-10-S EXHIBIT 7 1/ HASELDEN - .A CONSTRUCTION Sky Hotel Aspen, CO Construction Management Plan (CMP) June 23, 2015 PERMIT SUBMITTAL TABLE OF CONTENTS Page 1.0 GENERAL 3 1.1 PURPOSE 1.2 APPLICABILITY 1.3 DEFINITIONS AND TERMS 1.4 REFERENCES 2.0 PROJECT INTRODUCTION 5 2.1 DISTURBANCE AREA 2.2 LOCATION 2.3 DESCRIPTION 3.0 PROJECT DOCUMENTATION 6 3.1 PERMITS/ OTHER DOCUMENTS 3.2 PUBLIC NOTIFICATION 3.3 PROJECT SIGN 3.4 CONTACT DESIGNATION 4.0 PROJECT IMPLEMENTATION 8 4.1 DATES OF CONSTRUCTION 4.2 HOURS OF CONSTRUCTION 4.3 SEQUENCE (PHASING) OF CONSTRUCTION 4.4 ADJOINING PROPERTY OWNERS 4.5 PROJECT FENCING 4.6 PUBLIC HEALTH AND WELFARE 4.7 NATURAL ENVIRONMENT 5.0 PARKING MANAGEMENT 10 5.1 PARKING MANAGEMENT FORM 5.2 EMERGENCY VEHICLE MANAGEMENT ACCESS AND ORDINANCE 35 5.3 CONSTRUCTION PARKING DETAILS 5.4 STAGING AREAS 5.5 CONSTRUCTION TRAILER, MATERIALS STORAGE, AND WASTE MANAGEMENT 6.0 TRAFFIC CONTROL 12 6.1 GENERAL 6.2 HAUL ROUTES 6.3 ONSITE VEHICLE LIMITATIONS 6.4 DELIVERY REQUIREMENTS 1 V. HASELDEN .A CONSTRUCTION - 6.5 TRAFFIC CONTROL PLAN Sky Hotel Aspen, CO Construction Management Plan (CMP) TABLE OF CONTENTS - Continued 7.0 PEDESTRIAN PROTECTION 14 7.1 GENERAL 8.0 SEDIMENT AND EROSION CONTROL NOT APPLICABLE 14 9.0 FUGITIVE DUST CONTROL NOT APPLICABLE 14 10.0 EMISSIONS NOT APPLICABLE 14 11.0 NOISE SUPRESSION 15 11.1 GENERAL 11.2 NOISE SUPPRESSION PLAN 11.3 SPECIFIC RESTRICTIONS RELATED TO MANUFACTURING ONSITE 12.0 ENFORCEMENT 17 12.1 CONSTRUCTION MITIGATION OFFICER 12.2 CORRECTIVE ACTION 12.3 INSPECTION REPORTS APPENDICES APPENDIX A - PROJECT SIGN SAMPLE / SIGN PERMIT APPLICATION APPENDIX B - SITE LOGISTICS PLAN APPENDIX C - PROJECT SCHEDULE APPENDIX G - NOISE SUPPRESSION APPENDIX H - CITY OF ASPEN ORDINANCE 35 APPENDIX J- ASPEN MUNICIPAL CODE 21.04.060 - PEDESTRIAN PROTECTION APPENDIX L - CITY OF ASPEN ROW AND ENCROACHMENT PERMIT REQUESTS 2 v / HASELDEN .A A CONSTRUCTION 1.0 GENERAL 1.1 PURPOSE The purpose of this construction management plan is to provide a consistent policy under which certain physical aspects of construction management will be implemented on the Sky Hotel Project. Success of this Construction Management Plan not only depends on the systems and controls instituted by this plan, but on the leadership and commitment of workers, constructors, and suppliers. The goal of the Project is to institute a program that promotes the desired results by all workers, contractors, and suppliers. This plan is premised on the idea that it is better to support correct actions than to focus on correcting improper actions. 1.2 APPLICABILITY This construction management plan shall govern the construction of Sky Hotel. 1.3 DEFINITIONS AND TERMS Construction Management Plan - The Construction Management Plan is a combination of diagrams, documents, drawings, and specifications that clearly define the steps that will be taken to demonstrate how the impacts to the Adjacent Property Owners, neighbors, Aspen residents and visitors will be minimized. This plan will demonstrate how the impacts associated with this project will be proactively managed. Herein described as CMP throughout the remainder of this policy, this Construction Management Plan is a living document and will be updated as necessary according to site conditions and phasing plans. Any updates and/or changes will be communicated to the City of Aspen Engineering Department in writing. A copy of the approved CMP will be kept and maintained onsite at all times. Construction Mitigation Officer- An appointed employee of the City of Aspen whose charge is to ensure that all aspects of the Construction Management Plan are followed, and to further ensure that the impacts associated with construction activities associated with this project are the least necessary to accomplish the project. Disturbance Area- A portion of land where the topsoil or native soils have been removed for the purposes of construction (development) Best Management Practices (BMP's)- Schedules of activities, prohibitions of practices, maintenance procedures, and other management practices to prevent or reduce the pollution of waters of the state. BMP's also include treatment requirements, operating procedures, and practices to control site runoff, spillages or leaks, waste disposal, or drainage from material storage. 3 7 / HASELDEN .A CONSTRUCTION Tree Dripline and Protection Zone - Use the longest branch of the tree as a radius from the center of the tree and make a circle. The circle is then defined as the dripline - and thus is the tree protection zone. Final Stabilization- The uniform vegetative cover has been established with density of at least 70 percent of pre-disturbed levels. 1.4 REFERENCES A, City of Aspen Policy 205-Right of Way Permit Requirements. B. City of Aspen Policy 204-A Revocable Encroachment License Application C. City of Aspen Construction and Mitigation Standards for Work in the Public Right of Way D. City of Aspen Municipal Code Titles 13, 21, and 26. E. City of Aspen Ordinance 35. F. Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices for Streets and Highways- 2003 Edition. G. Colorado Department of Public Safety General Permit Part IBC H. Colorado Department of Transportation M&S Construction Standards 1. Colorado Department of Public Health and Environment- Air Pollution Control Division 4 7 / HASELDEN *A CONSTRUCTION 2.0 PROJECT INTRODUCTION 2.1 DISTURBANCE AREA This project consists of demolition of the existing hotel and construction of a new hotel.. The overall SF footprint of the project is approx. 36,000 SF. 2.2 LOCATION The project is located at 709 East Durant Ave., on the corner of South Spring Street and Durant Avenue. 2.3 DESCRIPTION i The Sky Hotel project consists of a complete rebuild of a new Hotel. 3.0 PROJECT DOCUMENTATION 3.1 PERMITS / OTHER DOCUMENTATION Haselden Construction will maintain all applicable local, state and federal licenses and permits that apply to this project. 3.1.1 The building permit will be applied for and paid by the Developer of the Project. 3.1.2 The following permits will be applied for by Haselden Construction: Right of Way Permits (as required), Revocable Encroachment License , Temporary Sign permit 3.2 PUBLIC NOTIFICATIONS 3.2.1 The following procedures will be utilitized for public notification 3.2.1.1 Initial Public Notification Update - The first public notification will occur no later than 10 days prior to the start of construction. This notification will be sent out to adjacent property owners. The update will include the following items: 1. Project Phasing 2. Overall Project Schedule 3. Site Logistics / Safety 4. Traffic and /or pedestrian control measures and how they will be utilized during the construction of the project to protect the adjacent properties and pedestrians. 5. Dust Control 6. Noise Suppression 7. Date and Location of Preconstruction Meeting indicated below 5 7 / HASELDEN CONSTRUCTION 3.2.1.2 Communication of Issues During Construction from Adjacent Neighbors and Residents. In order to proactively address any concerns during the construction phases, Haselden Construction will provide a designated representative that each point of contact for the neighbor groups can contact if a concern arises. A phone # and email address will be made available to contact this representative. The Haselden Representative will then communicate in a timely manner with the point of contact for each neighbor group. 3.2.1.3 Prior Notification of Operations That May Affect Adjacent Neighbors and Residents. If a construction operation will affect the adjacent property owners, HCL will provide prior notification via email. These notifications will be related to construction activity that may affect them outside the normal everyday construction activities (i.e. noise related activities, etc) These notices will be emailed out 48 hours prior to the start of any of these operations 3.3 PROJECT SIGN A project sign will be constructed and posted per City of Aspen requirements. The sign will be posted in a location where it is readable from the street or driveway and will meet the City Municipal Code 26.510.030B4. Haselden will obtain all permits as required by the City of Aspen for project signage. 3.4 CONTACT DESIGNATION Haselden Construction - Preconstruction Manager - Gary Manchester (303) 728-3812 Haselden Site Superintendent- Dan Nelson - (970) 309-2623 State Certified Safety Officer- (Thomas White) (303) 681-4870 State Certified Erosion Control Representative - Michael Gurule - (303) 483-8990 Emergency Contact Info - 911 31 4.0 PROJECT IMPLEMENTATION 4.1 DATES OF CONSTRUCTION The project is currently scheduled to start in April/May 2016 and will be complete by December of 2017. A preliminary project schedule has been included in Appendix C of this document. 6 7 / HASELDEN .A CONSTRUCTION 4.2 HOURS OF CONSTRUCTION Construction hours will be limited to 7:30 am to 5:30 pm M-F and 9 am to 5 pm on Saturdays during the following seasons: Memorial Day through Labor Day and November 15 through March 31. No construction is permitted on Sundays, 4th of July, Memorial Day and Labor Day weekends, Thanksgiving Day, Christmas Day and New Years Day. Construction hours during off season from April 1 through day before Memorial Day, and day after Labor day to November 14 will be 7:30 am - 7pm Monday through Friday and from 9am - 5pm on Saturdays. No exterior construction will be permitted on Sundays. During Presidents Day and during Christmas week (Dec 26-Dec 31): --Projects located in the Central Resort Area (CRA) are not permitted to work on exterior elements, however interior work may be permitted with prior approval. This includes Sky Hotel During Food and Wine Festival in June (Friday thru Saturday): --Projects located within the CRA are not permitted to work, which includes Sky Hotel. It is Haselden's intent to work inside the building past the hours listed above if necessary, but any work after these ours will be non-noise generating activities and will not impact adjacent properties. Haselden may submit a work plan for approval to work 24 hours a day for interior work from the City of Aspen Engineering Department during the offseason. Any variance of the above hours will be reviewed two (2) working days, in advance and approved by the City of Aspen. 4.3 SEQUENCE (PHASING) OF CONSTRUCTION This project has been designed to facilitate its development in a single delivery. Specific milestone dates are shown in the project schedule under Appendix C. 4.4 ADJOINING PROPERTIES / SHORING OF EXCAVATION Unless shown as part of the work in the Construction Documents, no excavation shall take place close enough to a property line to endanger any adjacent pubic street, sidewalk, alley, or other public or private property or easement. If any such work needs to take place, all excavation work shall be properly supported and shored to protect from any damage that might occur due to the construction activity. 4.5 PROJECT FENCING 7 V / HASELDEN .A CONSTRUCTION Construction fencing and barriers will be utilized around the perimeter of the project to protect pedestrians and adjacent property owners from any work that may occur on the outside of the building. Fencing may be constructed of acoustical sound blankets to achieve allowable dB levels at the property line. Fencing shall be constructed of 6' high chain link fence with green mesh as visual barriers at gated areas. Safety signage will be installed at the entrance gates indicating safety rules and check in procedures. The fencing outline is shown on the Site Logistics Plan. 4.6 PUBLIC HEALTH AND WELFARE Public Health and Welfare is an important concern of Haselden Construction. Haselden Construction pledges not to compromise the safety of our employees, subcontractors, or the public to achieve any operational or business objective during the construction of the Sky Hotel. Our aim is to prevent all accidents and injuries. Each Superintendent has the responsibility to recognize and avoid unsafe situations and acts. Haselden Construction expects the entire construction management team to ensure safe and healthful working conditions, to instruct employees in safe practices and inform workers and public of any work place hazards. All employees are expected to work in a manner, which safeguards themselves and the public, and participate in the improvement of work conditions and work practices in order to reduce hazards at all Haselden Construction work sites. FIRE HYDRANT ACCESS/SAFETY - Access to the fire hydrants will be kept clear, after installation and final testing. If necessary, concrete barriers will be utilized to protect and maintain access to fire hydrants at all times. Emergency response phone numbers will be posted on the site, in the job trailer and as required by city codes. Fire suppression equipment and first aid equipment will be on-site, in the site construction office and on- site, in appropriate areas. Individual hand held fire extinguishers will be located, as required, at the areas under construction. Early and ongoing communication with the Aspen Fire Department will be critical to maintain a clear understanding of construction plan. 4.7 NATURAL ENVIRONMENT 4.7.1 Environmental procedures will be implemented on this project to ensure compliance with EPA (Environmental Protection Agency), CDOT (Colorado Department of Transportation), and City of Aspen requirements for construction site storm water run-off. 4.7.2 Site clearing and excavation will be conducted in a manner to reduce the impact on local ecosystems. 4.7.3 Construction BMP's as indicated on the plans will be placed, and maintained to protect the existing environment. 4.7.4 All hazardous materials will be disposed of or treated as per the requirements of the manufacturers recommendations, 8 7 / HASELDEN .A CONSTRUCTION 4.7.5 Concrete washout pits will be placed and maintained as indicated on the plans. 4.7.6 On site fueling of equipment will be conducted in a designated area to prevent accidental spillage or contamination around the site. 4.7.7 Machinery used on the project will abide by the City of Aspen noise abatement standards and per Section 11- NOISE SUPPRESSION below. 5.0 PARKING MANAGEMENT 5.1 PARKING MANAGEMENT Shuttling of employees will be utilized for this project. All construction related parking for managers required on site will be located within the boundaries of the project fencing. 5.2 EMERGENCY VEHICLE ACCESS AND ORDINANCE 35 The emergency vehicle route will be kept open at all times for vehicle access and will follow Ordinance 35 by the City of Aspen. 5.3 CONSTRUCTION PARKING DETAILS Shuttling of employees will be required for this project. Shuttle vans will transport workers to the jobsite from the Interceptor Lot located that Highway 82 and Snowmass Road. 5.4 STAGING AREAS Area for staging is limited on this project site. Deliveries will be managed on a Just in Time delivery basis. Staging and storage will be within the footprint of the building as needed not to impede construction and will only be in the Block 107 Alley that is within the project fence boundary and as to not impede flow or create a safety issue with access and egress. 5.5 CONSTRUCTION TRAILER, MATERIALS STORAGE, AND WASTE MANAGEMENT 5.5.1 Our plan is to maintain a small construction office in the Block 107 Alley. Temporary utilities such as gas, power and water will utilize existing hotel services and temporary toilet facilities will be located in the same alley way and is shown on the site logistics plan. 5.5.2 Haselden Construction takes great pride in maintaining a clean well organized construction site. Haselden Construction will monitor the site on a daily basis to 9 r / HASELDEN CONSTRUCTION ensure that construction materials, debris, litter, and trash will be picked up on a continual basis and secured and /or placed in the appropriate receptacle. Construction debris that migrates outside of the project boundary will be collected immediately and the perimeter of the site will be policed daily. A clean site inside and outside of the project boundary promotes safety and productivity which are two of our most valued commodities. 5.5.3 Haselden Construction will take the lead with regard to diverting construction debris from landfills. Haselden will coordinate waste management including separate roll-off containers as required to meet or exceed the City of Aspen recycling requirements outlined below. 5.5.4 Haselden will meet or exceed the recycling as required by the City of Aspen Listed Below: 5.5.4.1 Both conventional and construction related debris will be required to be recycled, according to this document and City of Aspen Municipal Code (26.575.060) 5.5.4.2 Project site conventional recycling of co-mingled materials (plastics #1- #7, tin, aluminum, and glass), and cardboard will have an assigned space/area and will separated on-site during the project. These materials may not be disposed of in the trash. 5.5.4.3 During demolition phases of this project, careful deconstruction will allow for proper sorting, recycling and salvaging. 5.5.4.4 Scrap metals will be sorted and kept separate on-site and will have an assigned space/area. 5.5.4.5 Field inspections will occur throughout the permit process. If sorting of materials is not occurring onsite, other means of verification will provided to City of Aspen as deemed appropriate. - 5.5.4.6 Per municipal code, any dumpster or other trash receptacle that is used for food refuse will be constructed in such a manner as to render it bear 5.5.5 Haselden Construction also intends to recycle wood, metal, cardboard (in 20-30 yard roll off dumpster containers). 5.5.6 Bear proof containers will be used for all food and drink trash during necessary seasons, per City of Aspen. 5.5.7 Concrete and asphalt will be recycled on site or locally if crushing equipment is available in the valley. 5.5.8 Tree branches and small diameter trees will be recycled into mulch for tree _ protection and dust mitigation. 10 7 / HASELDEN .A CONSTRUCTION 5.5.9 Any topsoil onsite will be stockpiled and recycled to new landscape beds or sod areas. 5.5.10 Hazardous material spill cleanup kits will be located at several areas around the site. 6.0 TRAFFIC CONTROL 6.1 GENERAL The traffic control operations will be managed by the designated certified traffic control supervisor. Certified traffic control personnel shall be employed by the Contractor and shall be used as necessary. All traffic control personnel shall be equipped with a radio and appropriate flagging/signage equipment. The traffic control personnel will coordinate the entering and exiting of delivery trucks with buses and pedestrian traffic. Temporary Encroachment Licenses will be obtained for work as required from The City of Aspen. 6.2 HAUL ROUTES Construction related traffic to the Sky Hotel Jobsite will flow from Highway 82/Main Street, to South Aspen Street, to East Durant Avenue to jobsite. This route is consistent with the Official Heavy Haul Route Map per City of Aspen. 6.3 ONSITE VEHICLE LIMITATIONS On site construction related traffic shall consist of company vehicles, shuttle vans, delivery vehicles, and construction related equipment. 6.4 DELIVERY REQUIREMENTS Traffic control for the deliveries to Sky Hotel will be coordinated with the City of Aspen as required. There will be a designated traffic control person located at the entrance and exit gates as shown on the site logistics plan to coordinate deliveries and pedestrian traffic. Delivery drivers shall contact HCL's Superintendent a minimum of two (2) business days prior to a delivery, to coordinate the delivery and unloading process. Deliveries will only be allowed through this area between 7:30 A.M. and 4:00 P.M. In addition, delivery trucks will not be allowed to park along the alley or any adjacent streets near the jobsite. 11 7 / HASELDEN .A CONSTRUCTION If trucks arrive early, they will be required to park and wait down valley at a designated location depending on truck size until their designated delivery time. Delivery drivers must report to the designated traffic control person before entering site. Failure of delivery drivers to coordinate deliveries with HCL's designated representative may result in the delivery being set away and rescheduled. Delivery Vehicles and all onsite vehicles will not be allowed to idle for more than five (5) minutes and will be required to comply as per the City of Aspen Municipal Code (13.08.110). 7.0 PEDESTRIAN PROTECTION 7.1 GENERAL The site will have construction fencing placed adjacent to active roads, sidewalks, alley ways, or existing buildings to provide a separation barrier between construction activities and the pedestrian traffic. The fence will be relocated and movable, as required to protect the public from the construction area. 7.1.1 Temporary protection will be utilized if work is required outside of the building. Encroachment permits will be obtained for any work that affects the sidewalks around the perimeter of the building. 7.1.2 Temporary signage, traffic cones, and orange fencing will be used to direct both pedestrian and vehicle traffic. A pedestrian traffic control flagman will be posted at the construction entrance to coordinate pedestrian and vehicle traffic flow. It is anticipated traffic would be intermittently stopped at different times during construction activities to facilitate material deliveries. 7.1.3 Pedestrian Safety devices shall follow the requirements of city code 21.04.060, MUTCD chapter 6D, the Americans with Disability Act, and IBC Chapter 33. 7.1.4 Haselden Construction will install warning signs informing the public of construction activity around the perimeter of the jobsite. 7.1.5 Construction workers shall be limited to working within the limits of the construction site. Construction workers will not be allowed outside of limits unless required for construction purposes. 7.1.6 The site will be secured and locked during non-working hours and trespassers will be subject to prosecution for trespassing. 7.1.7 All visitors to the jobsite must check in at the jobsite trailer in the Block 107 Alley. Proper attire and orientation will be required for any visitor to walk the jobsite. This site will not be open to the public unless it is coordinated with a Sky Hotel Representative who in turn will coordinate a visit with Haselden Construction. 12 7 / HASELDEN .A CONSTRUCTION Timing and access of visits will be determined at a later date in coordination with Hotel Jerome Personnel. 8.0 SEDIMENT AND EROSION CONTROL - Not applicable under 1 acre 9.0 FUGITIVE DUST CONTROL - 9.1 An Air Pollution Emission Notice and Permit is not required from the State. 9.2 Fugitive Dust Control Measures for Sky Hotel: 9.2.1 Wetting of the disturbed soil areas will be required during dry conditions or as directed by the Construction Mitigation Officer. Onsite water source or water truck will be utilized. 9.2.2 Vehicle speeds within the site will be limited 5 MPH 10.0 EMISSIONS - NOT APPLICABLE 11 NOISE SUPPRESSION 11.0 GENERAL Every reasonable effort will be made to minimize the noise impact of construction activities. Noise limits for construction activities is 80 decibels measured at the property line of the construction site. The current 80 dB level will be evaluated to ensure compliance with the updated noise standards as outlined in the City's CMP requirements manual issued in April 2015. All construction equipment shall be adequately muffled and maintained to minimize project noise. 11.1 NOISE SUPPRESSION PLAN 11.1.1 All activities that generate noise in excess of 80 decibels at the property line will require a noise suppression plan and will be restricted between 7:30 am and 5 pm Monday through Saturday. Mitigation measures will include instituting a proactive program to ensure compliance with the City of Aspen. The following measures will be utilized to mitigate noise as required" 11.1.1.1 Notification of neighbors within two hundred fifty (250) feet of the project will occur to inform them of the kinds of equipment, projected variation of noise levels during a typical construction days. Notification will be done in writing and be done seven (7) days prior to the starting time of the project. 11.1.1.2 Equipment will be operated in accordance with manufacturer's specifications and with all standard manufacturers' mufflers and noise-reducing equipment in use and in properly operating condition. 13 7 / HASELDEN .A CONSTRUCTION 11.1.1.3 Notices will be posted to inform workers, including sub contractors, about the basic noise requirements, as well as specific noise restrictions, to the project. This will also be communicated to subcontractors during weekly subcontractor meetings at the jobsite. 11.1.1.4 The use of stereos on site will not be allowed. 11.1.1.5 Acoustical blankets will be used to keep noisy activities such as brick cutters or jackhammers within allowable dB limits. 11.1.1.6 Noisy equipment such as cement mixers for masonry operations will be placed on the site to maximize the distance from neighboring houses and/or rotate location so as to not impact just one neighbor. 11.1.1.7 All equipment will be properly maintained, with special attention to mufflers and other noise control devices. 11.1.1.8 Between work periods, builders will be required by city ordinance to shut down machines such as backhoes, bobcats, loaders and generators. 11.1.1.9 When dropping materials from a height-for example, into or out of a truck, or when loading or unloading scaffolding, chute or side baffles will be used to minimize noise disturbance. 11.1.2 Haselden Construction will conduct base line and periodic testing of activities on site for compliance of 80 db at the site boundaries. Haselden will utilize a hand held device to monitor readings. These readings will be tracked in a log book for reference. 11.2 SPECIFIC RESTRICTIONS RELATED TO MANUFACTURING ON SITE 11.2.1 No onsite manufacturing will be completed onsite 12 ENFORCEMENT 12.1 CONSTRUCTION MITIGATION OFFICER The City of Aspen Mitigation Officer will be assigned to the Sky Hotel project. The City Construction Mitigation Officer will conduct random site visits to determine if the project is following approved Plan and City requirements. The Officer is not intended to take the place of the City of Aspen Building Inspector. 14 7 / HASELDEN ~ CONSTRUCTION 12.2 CORRECTIVE ACTION 1. The first corrective action is a verbal warning and explanation of the violation with a timeframe for compliance. Haselden Construction will issue a non compliance notification to any subcontractor in connection with the violation. 2. The second notice from the City of Aspen will be a written warning or correction notice with timeframe for compliance. Haselden Construction will require a written response from the subcontractor involved as to the corrective measures and timeframe for compliance. 3. The third and final notice is a "Stop Work Order" (Red Tag). If a stop work order is issued, no more work can be completed until the violation is corrected. Haselden Construction will notify the subcontractor involved of non-performance requirements as stated in the subcontract agreement. 12.3 INSPECTION REPORTS The Construction Mitigation Officer will complete construction inspection reports. All reports are public and will be kept in the City Engineering Asset Management Department. Sky Hotel Construction Management Plan 15 V. HASELDEN .A CONSTRUCTION APPENDIX A - PROJECT SIGN SAMPLE Sky Hotel Construction Management Plan 16 V. HASELDEN .A CONSTRUCTION APPENDIX B -SITE LOGISTICS PLAN Sky Hotel Construction Management Plan 17 0 ---- C---- 41Uzzp~ - 1 \ P o i n t ( w i t h fl a g g e r ) / WITH 1 HE UTILITY PROVIDERS CONTRACTOR TO PROVIDE ALL TRENCHING BIDDING, AND BACKFILL *Â·Pa --- -// Construction Gate #2 - Exit / GENERAL UTILITY NOTES: 1 CONmACTOR TO COORDINATE ABANDONMENT. RELOCATON, AND BURIAL OF THE EXISTING UnLITIES t - '11Â£ ---- I. Lit.: -\\ 1 .1 WORK NECESSARY FOR UT,LITY RELOCATION. THE UT]Ur, PROVIDER IS TO PERFORM ALL UNEWORK ~ FNv Hy Sw - F - M p _~:_~~r --N--- 4795- AV ._ *I: M 1-- 9 NECE:SARY lili Ch,20 ~*Epi 24 '42*771 IA, P!3&2:d'WATEB , 140\\\\ 2 8 7932.29 . IL=_ rE- Limit of Disturbance / "- 4-- 1 .FO . I ICIFAq)4}LE CONSENT OF THE PROPERTY OWNERCS) INVOLVED k- E 2. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL CONTAIN HI S CONSTRUCTION OPERATIONS WITHIN THE LiMI TS OF Construction Fence with -- 3 1 I.-TL .P \\ 30>42:~:7=29--Â«- ~ CONS'RUCTION CONTRACTOR SHALL NOT OPERATE OUTSIDE THIS AREA WITHOUT THE PRIOR 3 THE LOCATIONS OF UNDERGROUND UnUIES HAVE BEEN PLOTTED BASED ON UTHUTY MAPS, LOCATES O 0 Screening , PROPOSED FIRE DEPA ENT RESPONSIBILTI OF THE CONTRACTOR TO CONTACT ALL UTILITY COMPANIES FOR FIELD LOCATION OF -- OR OMER INFORMAT]ON PROVIDED BY UTIUTY COMPANTES AND ACTUAL FIELD LOCATIONS IN SOME I APPROXIMATE LOCATIO'OF - ./ INSTANCES THESE UI UIES, AS SHOWN MAY NOT REPRESENT ACTUAL FIELD CONDITIONS. IT iS THE ZZ UTIU TES PRICOR TO CONSTRUCTION 4. AU. UTIUTIES. BOTH UNDERGROUND AND OVERHEAD. SHALL BE MAINTAINED IN CONTINUOUS SERVICE THROUGHOUT THE ENnRE CONSTRUCTION PERJOD THE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE AND 15 LIABLE FOR ANY DAMAGES TO OR INTERRUPTION OF, SERVICES CAUSED BY THE CONSTRUCTION. 6~,~Pt-/&1, *j"A .1~;0~ ff ,/ PUBLIC.IMPROVEMENTS NOTE: PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION .w . : I/2 â‚¬/ b 4.- ~fo# i.~,1,5-4*41- \ \/ --------- 4-1 v = 793633' 5 CONT'ACTOR TO COORDI NATE ALL UTILITY UNEWORK WITH THE RESPECTIVE UTILITY COMPANY -ya-- - P -2 | --Â« %~c,wp#Mr,& f ~ f ti/ ~ T. 3 --- -4.46... Â¥942-4. .4 -\--- - 4. 6 1,4 041/ /Ar' # .-. -< * ift- + - *LtÂ·i - -- . 6 ALL S:rE AND UT1UTY WORK SHALL BE IN COMPUANCE WITH CITY OF ASPEN RULES & REGULATIONS \\\ ~ , Uff,=!4~4~ ~ ~ ~ 4 - - *34 - - Â·Â·-7 -2 7 I. 0 w / 1 PUBLIA IMPROVEMEn SHALL BE IN COMPLIANCE WiTH THE CITY OF ASPEN ENGINEERING STANDARDS \ jill | 522 22' -314- I,4 4<-- CONS'RUCTION AND EXCAVADON STANDARDS. PLAT OF - . L - .4 -- 41 - -N --- - - - 1 N DVISION .~. 6' - ' ABANDON EXISTING Â£ . - 202 ' -4 + I - MEETNG IS REQUIRED PRIOR TO COMMENCEMENT OF WORK r I r /' i , Â· 7 VITRIFIED CLAY PIPE SEWER SERVICEATTHEMAIN *44 0,Â·..: k - PER ACSD REGUtATIONS -x---4, -- - j :I f ~- l concrete 417 % - r ~hmÂ©~-- - ~ ~ ' j ~'Re~/._ 1 ALL- MiNMUM DEPTHS. SEPARATION DISTANCES, MATERIALS ANC)~OR USE OF CONDUIT SHALL BE ----*,~74,- f SHALLOWUTILITY NOTES: /4 V -- APPROXIMATE LOCATION OF . 4 3-0 2- 2 2 *- x kil, 1/Â·0 USE CLASS 6 AGGREGATE BASE MATERiAL FOR BEDDiNG, AND/OR SUITABLE ONSITE MATERIAL R PROPOSED PVC SEWER SERVICE J / 2 0 5 2 , 5 j, 2 ALL UTIUTÂ¢ LINES ANC)/OR CONDUJTS TO BE BACKFILLED WITH SUi TABLE MATERIAL FREE OF ROCKS >1 INSTAUL PER UTILITY PROVIDER SPEIFICATONS. BACKFILL TRENCHES WITH SUITABLE ONSITE PERACS"TANDAR. /*02/ /;'.7- , -- .Â© -/ MATE*IALS MINIMUM COMPACTION 95/ IN PAVED AREAS -<420- A.7, .24 ---\ 6" PVC BASED ON ESTIMATED 7, CONCEPTUAL DES~GN, T Iy 42*fl; 75- 3 GAS AND ELECTRIC TO BE INSTALLED IN SEPARATE TRENCHES SEWER SERVICES TO BE INSTALLED A I 4 24 0 ELECTRIC, TELEPHONE, CABLE ~--c~ _, V.. .--- - - f MINIMUMIM 1[ FROM WATER SERViCES AS FEASIBILE. COMMUNICATIONS MAY BE INSTALLED IN APPOXIMA-TE LOCATION OF ' ' / AND FIBER OPTIC SERVICES. ROUTE ' -4 CHATEAU DUMONT LODGE -- AND DEPTHS OF BURY ARE MAINTAINED. INSTALL WARNING TAPE OVER ALL UnLII LINES Z g COMBINED TRENCHES PER CONSTRUCTION FEASIBUTI AS LONG AS MINIMUM SEPARAnON DISTANCES 2 . l - 1 , AND L.mITY PROVIDERS SPEC,FlCATIONS. ' '4 / 1 . VS 1 1 AND CITY OF ASPEN ROW STANDARDS PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS IN THE ROW MUST MEET THE CITYÂ·S 2 CONT'ACTOR TO INSTALL WAER SERVICE PER /1. OF ASPEN STANDARDS A PRE-CONSTRUCTION Â¥ I .. 3- %'/ 07 - I f -- Sâ€¢ i CONFIRMED AND COORDINATED WTH THE UTILITY PROVIDER PER Un LIT, AGREEMENTS 14 - -4 2/ P --44 - W-*- ' F AMZNM~t;iMW / V ~ / / ie 2 / 21 ~ /7 f . - 41 ~NSTALL NEW 12"*4" TEEAND A u '. UT]LITY SERVICE MI NI MUM DEPTH ~ Dumpsters --1 LU < 3 4.' GATE VALVE PER CITY OF /~ ~,~,r + Z Z .2-. & ASPEN WATER DEPARâ„¢ENT , ~ *... -~ 1 / INSTALL NEW TELEPHONE ANDCABLE SEWER---5 0 WATER 70 STANDARDS.~ , / - --â€¢4_- -- 4,-7.C * 3 ts PVC Hie CHATEAU CHAUMONT. PEDESTALS. EXTENDTELEPHONE, FIBER x- 44 ELECTRI-- 0 O 0 4 1 EXTEND EXISTING GAS SERVICE / i J. ~ ~' / i - j kIOTELANDTOCHATEAUDUMONT ~I ~: PHONE---3 C ' // OPTIC & CABLE SERVICES TO NEW CABLE TV 3.0 ;-/ / C,Â·C 3.(3 INE INIQ MECHANICAL ROOM ~ Ex :~ 1/, r Â· i / 5 1.1.1 9 E m&14*&*27.6 METER' f'' -r-*- '' ' -'I Job Toilets ----\---Â»949 --1 1 -MASÂ·/U f 6- L /Se / -. f Construction Gate #1 - / 1 UTILITY PLAN LEGEND - u . LL *.. CA*/I' 4 - .464- 4 PROPOSED WATER VALVE I CHATEAU CHAUMONT LODGE .~ ..~ ... PROPOSEDWATER SERVICE U ATTHEVA+iftakÂ·'D 7-\J f c r m L- Entry Point (with flagger) / REC.#133420 91 - -â€ž m -w - - PROPOSED SANITARY SEWER SERVICE ':_J_Â·Â·Â·Hor.5. ' , _ _ . i ' f Â· - PROPOSED GAS 1 1 W I -. -la - PROPOSED UNDERGROUND ELECTRIC 0/< 3 / 'll - T PROPOSED TELEPHONE 1 4 I '1 ~- 2 Job Trailer e .--0- - i f-~ --- ~~ |~'â€¢Â· 0~4::9~2' ff f /-/- ~~/ ~9.1-2 1 1 1 1 j PROPOSED CABLE / 2 . i -M) -0 - PROPOSED FIBER OPTIC &02Â§6&/ 2 4 1.1 z L 1 1 ~ ~ t I--1--4 Emergency Eg ress/ /.*Nob~Ex,50*/- 422 -- PRO80SED STORM SEWER I '' --atm 7 . k W/* 7 IN - f Access into Chateau shall Â£21 OF- 11 IS l 11: 11 UbÂ©\ - ~4 PROPOSED GAS METERVALVE - / EL//TRIC METW 6 , ~ - -'t * --Ii*-IL -#t/Al- - , 0 III ~1 PROPOSED ELECTRIC TRANSFORMER remain open VE Â¥ M ' 4 Access Gate ,/''-,t> - 7 Â«OJp~~LP-~~--r----w, --- f ov ~ PROPOSED STORM INLET 1 1 1 4 I 7, 9 - 19Â· |! PBOPOSED SENER C.ENO31 SKY HOTEL 709 E. 14 1 LOT AVE . -- -1, DURANT Sk '1 1 ' * 2, - 1. 1%1 1 2/ EXISTING WATER MAIN 42,336 SF 1 .. ./ 'cr J , I REMOVE TELEPHONE j ANDCABLE SERVICES 1 1=2=nuj ' ->2.4,.43zbt 9-4 Â»-/2 / 13 ,-1- . -Â«70 ~ Â»9149Â«__ -Â·,1,â€¢ -,11â€¢ - EXISTING ELEC, TELE. CABLE. GAS "MOVE EXISTING ELECTRIC - . r -. - EXISTING ELEC. TELE, CABLE 1 . ---- -- =22:42946.22 -2- 9-9 01 M . f - i - - - Â·N - EXISTING TELEPHONE TRANSFORMERANDMETER 2122> A / 1 9 \--\ 1 0 1 ' f d - n. - Â·Â·. - EXISTING SANITARY SEWER MAIN -4 -,1 - EXISTING STORM SEWER 1 '51 1 : TA -Â·,Â·-Â·I-~Â·-Â·- EnSâ„¢GGAS 0 j,-1'.,Iii# ' 8- 1 4 Tower Crane Turnaround ~--221 -â€ž -â€¢' -â€ž - EXISTINGUNDERGROUNDELECTRIC 22Â· ~k--k-- REMOVE EXITING CABLE PEIESTAL . I 9---2 1--17 -4-- ~ ~if~~ 1~ Entry Point Location TBD - m. - i,u - EXISTING OVERHEAD ELECTRIC ~~-t..072-*-~-*. ~ Â· 9 1.-'- Â· I # ,Â£; 4 -9-1 Â«22 42. C r -__ .., nyâ€¢- 0ISTING FIBER OPTIC , - EXISTING CABLE mm i r i 1 1 \JECOb:LIEVEL#[RRAILE. - - -7 2 - --3Â» - - ---~-Â«77*4.2=260uArkE- (with flagger) -------- EXISTINGIRRIGATION.PE GLORY HOLE . I.P.... y --7-- 2':*497# EXISTING PROPERTY LINE '41 - r f NE-1 --------- EXISTING EASEMENT 11 CONDOMINIUMS 2-0. . / 1 48/_ 1 1 5 - I. - 5. SETBACK GLORY HOLE CONDOMINIUMS b - - --Or--- - , '22.Ct>+abc #BIT. . .Â·9 , - F;6 ' .*f 0 1 E EXISTING ELECTRIC MANHOLE ) r: / 1 51 EXISINGSEWERMANHOLE t.- ,-# Â¥, 1/1 1 ? . 3 5 4 + / REC. #154986 0 1 / v. EXIS-nNG DRAINAGE DRY-WELL ' 0 11 -,74--J - ~ 1 v 1/4 Â£ PU EXTEND NEW 3-PHASE ~.~ EXISTING WATER VALVE -; 1 73 EXISTING FIRE HYDFWIT 3 f J f d k:wcti:ire 1 C li 12, Y , hÂ»-2- f :.... 2---7 .. ~/* '/ / ELECTRICSERVICETO A EXISTING GAS METER t NEWTRANSFORMER , MIll il f /1 LOCATION . EXISTING ELECTRIC TRANSFORMER t - D EXISTING ELECTRIC METER 4 2 44'l - - - -- - fib ,- :1 f m EXISTING TELEPHONE PEDESTAL .. 1/ ' I EXISTING GAS SERVICE D EXISnNG CATV PEDESTAL liIILI ehf-22..21,~12/2222~2 +Â· /-Z *-4#..Z ....21 .. - EXISING SIGN 1\ ij!,rot- , 1 m 1 TO BE ABANDONED .e 79\Fil C, EXISTi NG SEWER C:LEANOUT EXIS ING LIGHT POLE /- I. .. -1 -- 1\ i EX'Sn NG STORM INLET e; Â·i. \ SKEGBY HOLDINGSLIMITED,Â·~ . 1 ~j'01 ,/ 1* y; ./ REC.#382365 7 ~ ~/ 1 ,< Emergency Egress/Access Gate w .-4 2 71 k e . - 1 4 1. 44 1 4-- -3 r ---%- - -- -- 3 .. 2 \ 1 : 1 111 - ) -''!91/ 1 .A 1 ASPEN i \ i f fi/971 2 i/h 4 4./ .' --- 4 l 4 2 1 2L-. 3(fr*A-2'ilt:*--*_-*- S 'Â·â€ž~~~ *3-1 i H %#2 ALPS BUILDING 100 l - /1 L > Â« J Fence barrier will beadjusted i 1 1 111 V Â« r--_ . -- 0 69 / ''/ry 2 - 40/ LUZ D ODD i for ROW work as needed Surface parallel parking to WOM beturned overto Owner Sky Hotel *0)2 approx 10 months into co K o t construction Construction Management Â° Grn Construction Parking is Off Site at Site Logistics Plan GRAPHIC SCALE Snowmass Intercept Lot - Shuttle 80 Service shall be provided by Know what's below. --4 Ca|| before you dig, Haselden for all Subs Haselden Construction ( IN FEET) DATE 6-19-15 1 inch= 20 ft CALL 2-BUSINE5S DAYS IN ;,DVANCE B:of-~:21,3*#%,&~5&22 SIZE REDUCED FOR SUBMITTAL JOB NO 14040 MD,rBER ./UIES SHEET (4 ABVNIWI13hld 31Â¥0 91VllINI *Dll 'DNIH fiEldÂ° S M 03>103HS *9 03NDISED ~ 3nN3AV AS NAWN(] 133819 91 TLE N E LEO-DOL-(O V NOISI/\38 Ila %09 V. HASELDEN *A CONSTRUCTION APPENDIX C - PROJECT SCHEDULE Sky Hotel Construction Management Plan 18 v / HASELDEN .A CONSTRUCTION APPENDIX G - NOISE SUPPRESSION Sky Hotel Construction Management Plan 19 V. HASELDEN .A CONSTRUCTION APPENDIX H - ORDINANCE 35 Sky Hotel Construction Management Plan 20 V. HASELDEN .A CONSTRUCTION APPENDIX J - ASPEN MUNICIPAL CODE 21.04.060 - PEDESTRIAN PROTECTION Sky Hotel Construction Management Plan 21 V. HASELDEN .A CONSTRUCTION APPENDIX L - CITY OF ASPEN ROW AND ENCROACHMENT PERMIT REQUESTS 22 3 t Legal Tabs Co. 1-800-322-3022 * Stock#DO-10-S Ill Trip Generation Instructions: IMPORTANT: Turn on Macros: In order for code to run correctly the security settings need to be altered. Click "File" and then click "Excel Options." In the "Trust Center" category, click "Trust Center Settings", and then click the "Macro Settings" category. Beneath "Macro Settings" select "Enable all Macros." Sheet 1. Trip Generation: Enterthe project's square footage and/or unitcounts under Proposed Land Use. The ' ' numbers should reflect the net change in land use between existing and proposed conditions. Sheet 2. MMLOS: Answer Yes, No, or Not Applicable under each of the Pedestrian, Bike and Transit sections. Points are only awarded for proposed and confirmed aspects of the project. 4 Sheet 3. TDM: Choose the mitigation measures that are appropriate for your project. Sheet 4. Summary and Narrative: Review the summary of the project's mitigated trips and provide a narrative which explains the measures selected forthe project. Click on "Generate Narrative" and individually explain each measure that was chosen and how it enhances the site or mitigates vehicletraffic. Ensure each selected measure make sense Helpful Hints: 1. Refer tothe Transportation Impact Analysis Guidelines forinformation on the use of this tool. 2, Refer to TIA Frentientlv Ag kpr-1 (1 i ipâ‚¬tinng fnr A nuick overview, 2, Hover over rec Ifanspo[tation_Impact Analysis iation on individual measures. 3. Proposed TIA Frequently Asked Questions be new and/or an improvement of existing conditions. A project will not receive credit for measuresalready in place. Proposed TDM or MMLOS measures should also make sense in the = input = calculation DATE: 7/9/2015 PROJECT NAME: Sky Hotel PROJECT ADDRESS: 709 East Durant Avenue Aspen, CO APPLICANT CONTACT INFORMATION: Aspen Club Lodge Properties c/o Northridge Capital, LLC 1101 30th Street, NW, Suite 150 NAME, COMPANY, Washington, DC 20007 1.202.625.7890 ADDRESS, PHONE, EMAIL Minor Development - Inside the Roundabout Is this a major or minor project? Minor Major Development - Outside the Roundabout Net New Trips Generated Units/Square Feet of AM Peak-Hoir PM Peak-Hour Proposed Land Use the Proposed Project Entering Exiting Total Entering Exiting Total Commercial (sf) 0.0 sf 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Free-Market Housing (Units) O Units O.00 O.00 0.00 O.00 O.00 O.00 Affordable Housing (Units) 2 Units 0.72 0.78 1.50 0.98 0.80 1.78 Lodging (Units) 14 Units 2.00 1.51 3.50 2.26 2.08 4.34 Essential Public Facility (sf) 0.0 sf O.00 O.00 O.00 O.00 O.00 0.00 TOTAL NEW TRIPS 2.72 2.29 4.80 3.24 2.88 5.26 *For mixed-use (at least two of the established land uses) sites, a 4% reduction for AM Peak-Hourand a 14% reduction for PM Peak- Hour is applied to - the trip generation. ASSUMPTIONS ASPEN TRIPGENERATION AM Peak Averagâ‚¬ PM Peak Aver:ge Land Use Trip Rate %Entering %Exiting Trip Rate %Entering %Exiting Commercial 2.27 0.69 0.31 4.14 0.4 0.6 ~ t Free-Market Housing 0.67 0.29 0.71 0.82 0.56 0.44 0.75 0.48 0.52 0.89 0.55 0.45 Affordable Housing Lodging 0.25 0.57 0.43 0.31 0.52 0.48 Essential Public Facility 0.86 0.62 0.38 1.66 0.4 0.6 tabbies' â‚¬%:ArpÂ· MMLOS Input Page Instructions: Answer Yes, No, or Not Applicable to each measure under the Pedestrian, Bike and Transit sections. = i nput = calculation Category Sub. Site Plan Question Answer Points Does the project propose a detached sidewalk where an attached sidewalk currently exists? Does the proposed sidewalk and buffer Yes 5 meet standard minimum widths as well? ; -p Is the proposed effective sidewalk width greater than the standard 0 minimum width? Is proposed landscape buffer greater than the standard minimum width? 0 Subtotal 5 j .j Does the project propose a detached sidewalk on an adjacent block? Does the proposed sidewalk and buffer meet standard minimum 0 Widths? 1 ~~) Is the proposed effective sidewalk width on an adjacent block greater 0 than the standard minimum width? Is the proposed landscape buffer on an adjacent block greater than 0 the standard minimum width? Subtotal 0 -- . Are slopes between back of curb and sidewalk equal to or less than 15 1 Yes 0 5%? 9 6 , Are curbs equal to (or less than) 6 inches? Yes 0 Is new landscaping proposed that improves the pedestrian Yes 5 experience? 7 , Does the project propose an improved crosswalk? Yes 5 Subtotal 10 Are existing driveways removed from the street? 0 Is pedestrian and/or vehicle visibility unchanged by new structure or Yes 0 column? -Â£Â·, Is the grade (where pedestrians cross) on cross-slope of driveway 2% Yes 0 - or less? Does the project propose enhanced pedestrian access points? Yes 5 Does the project propose enhanced pedestrian or bicyclist interaction 0 with vehicles at driveway areas? Subtotal 5 C 9.1 Is the project's pedestrian directness factor less than 1.5? Yes 0 Is the project's pedestrian directness factor between 1 and 1.2? 0 Is the project proposing an off site improvement that results in a 0 pedestrian directness factor below 1.2?* Are traffic calming features proposed that are part of an approved 0 plan (speed humps, rapid flash)?* Subtotal 0 Are additional minor improvements proposed which benefit the pedestrian experience and have been agreed upon with City of Aspen 0 staff? Are additional major improvements proposed which benefit the pedestrian experience and have been agreed upon with City of Aspen 0 staff? Traffic Calming and Driveways, Parking, and Sidewalk Condition Sidewalk Condition Pedestrian Network Access Considerations on Adjacent Blocks on Project Frontage Proposed Pedestrian Routes Pedestrians Additional Improvements 53Â¥KE;iiiii#FR#Ef#ifii#Â®i#â‚¬23h- Category Sub. Question Answer Points Is a new bicycle path being implemented with City approved design? 0 Do new bike paths allow access without crossing a street or 0 driveway? Is there proposed landscaping, striping, or signage improvements to 0 an existing bicycle path? Does the project propose additional minor bicycle improvements 0 - which have been agreed upon with City of Aspen staff? Does the project propose additional major bicycle improvements 0 which have been agreed upon with City of Aspen staff? Subtotal 0 Is the project providing bicycle parking? Yes 5 Subtotal 5 t.iL==..2~:lmitâ€¢Ir-1-IdÂ¢-lullibf4.ALWia.,Â·11~41 2r~~ Category Sub. Question Answer Points 1 ,; Is seating/bench proposed? 0 2 , Isa trash receptacle proposed? 0 3 3 Is transit system information (signage) proposed? 0 4 3 Is shelter/shade proposed? 0 5 ) Is enhanced pedestrian-scale lighting proposed? 0 Is real-time transit information proposed? 0 6 1 Is bicycle parking/storage proposed specifically for bus stop use? 0 Are ADA improvements proposed? 0 Subtotal 0 Is a bus pull-out proposed at an existing stop? 0 Is relocation of a bus stop to improve transit accessibility or roadway 0 operations proposed? -- Is a new bus stop proposed (with minimum of two basic amenities)? 0 Subtotal 0 Enhanced Bicycle Modifications to Existing Bicycle Transit Bicycles Amenities Parking Paths Basic Amenities TDM Input Page '*: LAJ#i': .1 3/ le - k- I- .-I -- - t.,D . ,. 1 =tÂ¥ '49 i.~ ./le~mar- ./.Â£4 4/E.'# - -L:â€¢.aÂ·*,;A,u~- . fh.bulbyÂ·Â©.: instructionsTDM: Choose the mitigation measures that are appropriate for your project. Proposed TDM or MMLOS measures should be new and/or an improvement of existing conditions. A project will not receive credit for measures already in place. Proposed TIM or MMLOS measures should also make sense in the contextof project location and future use. Categor, Yes 10.(X}56 Sub. Anma Question Strategy VMT Reductions Will an onsite ammenities strategy be implemented? Onsite Servicing Which onsite ammenities wiil be implemented? Hotel with Retail Servicing Wili a shared shuttle service strategy be impiemented? What is the degree of implementation? 0.00% Shared Shuttle Service What is the company size? What percentage of customers are eligible? Nonmotorized Zones IWill a nonmotorized zones strategy be implemented? 1 0.00% Strategy VMT Category Sub. Question Answer Reductions will a network expansion stragtegy be implemented? Netwo rk Expansion What is the percentage increase of tramit network coverage? 0.00% What is the existing transit mode share as a % of total daily trips? Will a service frequency/speed strategy be implemented? Service Frequency/Speed What is the percentage reduction in headways (increase in frequency)? 0.00% What is the exiling transit mode share as a % of total daily trips? What is the level of impiementation? WIlla transit access improvement strategy be limplemented? O.Do% Transit Access Improvement What is the extent of access improvemen/? Intercept Lot IwiN an intercept lot strategy be implemented? | 0Â·00% Strategy VMT CategorÂ¥ Sub. Question Answer Reductions will there be participation In TOP? O.00% Participation in TOP What percentage c>f emptovees are eligible? is a transit fare subsidy strategy implemented? 0.00% Transit Fare Subsidy What percentage of employees are elig'ble? What is the amount of transit subsidy per passenger {daily equivalent)? 1 1, an employee parking cash-out strategy being implemented? 0.00% Employee Parking Cash-Out What percentage of employees are eligible? Is a workplace parking pricing strategy implemented? Workplace Parking Pricing what Is the daily parking charge? 0.00% 'What percentage of employees are subject to priced parking? Isa compressed work week5 strategy implemented? Compressed Work Weeks What percentage of employees are participating? 0.00% What is the workweekschedule? Is an employer sponsered shuttle program implemented? Employer Sponsored Vanpool What is the employer size? O.00% What percentage of employees are eligible? Isa carpoll mitching strategy implemented? 0.00% Carpool Matching What percentage of employees are eligble? Is carshare participation being implemented? Carshare Program How many employee memberships have been purchased, 0.0096 What percentage of employees are eligble? Is a bikeshare program participation being implemented? Bikeshare Program How many memberships have been purchased? O.00% What percentage of employees/guests are eligbie? Is an end of trip facilities strategy being implemented? Yes End of Trip Facilities What is the degree of implementation? High 3.50% What is the emp over .ize? Small Isa self-funded emergency ride home strategy being implemented? 0,00% Self-funded Emergency Ride Home What percentage of employees are eligible? 15 a carpool/vanpoll priority parking strategy being implemented? Carpool/Vanpool Priority Parking what M the employer size? 0,00% What number of parking spots are available for the program? Is a private employer shuttle strategy being implemented? Private Employer Shuttle What is the employer size? 0.00% What percentage of employees are eligible? Trip Reduction Marketing/Incentive Is a trip reduction marketing/Incentive program implemented? 0~00% Program What percentage of employees/guests are eligible? U-Ill----l....L. _ 9 ~d~E~ 11,1-kÂ·L~,4--I=. ImmrAZeÂ¥<g*>IMI"In"WM./0/Immn*Al/*EFF# .,Â· Â·:"ALmgmlaur#/*I'-%ill-Eagr ***7 1.22% work trips represents o mixed-used ite (S F Bay Areo Travet Survey). See Assumptions Tab for moredetoil Transit System Improvements Neighborhood/Site Enhanceminu Strategle, Commute Trip Reduction prograr,15 Strategks 5trategies Summary and Narrative: DATE: 7/9/2015 PROJECT NAME: Sky Hotel PROJECT ADDRESS: 709 East Durant Street Aspen, CO APPLICANT CONTACT ' r INFORMATION: Aspen Club Lodge Properties c/o Northridge Capital, LLC 1101 30th Street, NW, Suite 150 Washington, DC 20007 1.202.625.7890 NAME, COMPANY, ADDRESS, PHONE, EMAIL SUMMARY Trip Generation Trip Mitigation NET TRIPS TO BE Peak Hour Max Trips Generated MMLOS \ TDM Total Trips Mitigated- MITIGATED PM 5.3 25 0.56 25.56 0.00 Narrative: Click on the "Generate Narrative" Button to the right. Respond to each of the following prompts in the space provided. Each response should cover the following: 1. Explain the selected measure. 2. Call out where the measure is located. 3. Demonstrate how the selected measure is appropriateto enhance the project site and reduce traffic impacts. 4. Explain the Enforcement and Financing Plan for the selected measure. 5. Explain the scheduling and implementation responsibility of the mitigation measure. 6. Attach any additional information and a site map to the narrative report. Project Description In the space below provide a description of the proposed project. The Project Applicant proposes to demolish and replace the existing Sky Hotel with a mixed-use, hotel structure. The existing hotel contains a total of 90 lodging units, approximately 5,259 SF of commercial net leasable area, and a 13 car subgrade parking garage. The proposed hotel will result in 2 new affordable housing units and 14 new lodging units. MMLOS In the space provided call out the effective sidewalk width and the percentage of the site which meets or exceeds the minimum standard width. Explain the site constraints for areas which do not meet the minimum width. All sidewalks are a minimum width of 8 feet. The effective width is not always 8 feet (ie. when the sidewalk abuts the building). In the space provided desicribe what new landscaping is proposed and how the proposed landscaping plan enhances the pedestrian experience. This measure is only applicable to large scale projects and requires more extensive landscaping then a few plantings or lawn area. The project shall establish extensive landscaping which significantly benefits the site and improves the pedestrian comfort and experience. The site plan and streetscape are organized to create an inviting pedestrian environment includinggenerous, clearly defined sidewalks that connect meaningfully to the neighborhood and provide clear, safe circulation. The streetscape achieves a plaza-like character through the use of high-quality materials, terraced and vegetated seat walls, pedestrian-scaled paving, seating areas, bike racks, ski racks and similar. These features combine to create a truly dynamic pedestrian experience that is equally artful, environmentally sustainable, and functional, with particular attention given by the design team to make the streetscape, lobby and portals to the pool terraces above feel public and inviting. The planting pockets, planters and terraces create a diversity of buffers and are scaled to respond to the adjacent character of Aspen Mountain, creating a green environment that ovtenrIc frnm thA mn,intiin inrl intn tho riwir frinomc nf tho rihi Thocm r,11ntince mitiont= ri,ne,ff nrai,irl= ch:rling nf hirrler:ne foitilroc nffor , rlixiorcihi nf i,ki,$:1 hi,ffpre in nmohhnre Explain the proposed improved crosswatk and how this improvement benefits the pedestian experience and the site as a whole. An improved crosswalk includes measures such as incorporating a corner bulb out or defining a crosswalk path with colored concrete. Simply re-striping a crosswalk will not recieve credit. This measure must be pre-approved by City staff. A significant portion of the alley is completely reconceived, changing it from an asphalt, car-intensive environment to a primarily pedestrian through-court with pedestrian paving, ram gardens and more. It remains utilitarian in nature while providing access for emergency and service vehicles and limited residential parking only. The adverse impacts of service and parking are mitigated creating an attractive open space amenity. Additionally, a significant streetscape enhancement and corner sidewalk bulb-out is included at the northwest corner f of the project including detached sidewalk, street tree, ada ramps and pedestrian paving. ~ Describe the enhanced pedestrian access point(s). This measure is to improve pedestrian access to the site from the ROW. It includes adding additional access points which prevent pedestrians and bicyclists from crossing a street, improvements to the project's ADA ramps in the ROW, and improvements to existing access points. Multiple ada-compliant access points are provided throughout the project and streetscape, and are proposed where they previously did not exist. Include any additional information that pertains to the MMLOS plan in the space provided below. Enter Text Here TDM The project proposes onsite amenities. Describe the combination of amenities below. Providing a combination of creative onsite amenities reduces the need for SOV trips , throughout the day. Services within the development that will reduce the need for auto trips include grocery, restaurant, recreation rental, dry cleaning, child care, bicycle repair stations, etc. A combination of amenities is required. ski lockers, ski shop, bar/caf@ on roof(s) Explain the proposed end of trip facilities strategy below. The provision of convenient facilities for pedestrians and cyclists encourages these types of alternative modes, thus reducing SOV trips. Non-residential projects may provide facilities such as showers, secure bicycle lockers, personal lockers, changing spaces, etc. showers, lockers Include any additional information that pertains to the TDM pian in the space provided below. Enter Text Here MMLOS Site Plan Requirements Include the following on a site plan. Clearly call out and label each measure. Attach the site plan to the TIA submittal. Sidewalk Width and Buffer Width Slopes Between Back of Curb and Sidewalk Landscape Plan Crosswalk Improvement(s) 2% Slope at Pedestrian Driveway Crossings Enhanced Pedestrian Access Point Pedestrian Directness Factor {See callout number 9 on the MMLOS sheet for an example) Bicycle Parking Enforcement and Financing Provide an overview of the Enforcement and Financing plan for the proposed transportation mitigation measures. A Public Facilities + Public Infrastructure Financial Guarantee is included within the Sky Hotel Subdivision/PD Development Agreement. Scheduling and Implementation Responsibility of Mitigation Measures Provide an overview of the scheduling and implementation responsibility for the proposed transportation mitigation measures. Please refer to the Construction Management Plan, included as an exhibit in this application. Monitoring and Reporting Provide a monitoring and reporting plan. Refer to page 17 in the Transportation Analysis Guidelines for a list of monitoring plan requirements. Components of a Monitoring and Reporting Plan should include (1) Assessment of compliance with guidelines, (2) Results and effectiveness of implemented measures, (3) Identification of additional strategies, and (4) Surveys and other supporting data. Not applicable; as the mitigation measures are primarily hardscape and will be implemetned per plan and confirmed upon issuance of Certificate of Occupancy. We anticipate no ' further monitoring will be required. Summary and Narrative: DATE: 7/9/2015 1 PROJECT NAME: Sky Hotel PROJECT ADDRESS: 709 East Durant Street Aspen, CO APPLICANT CONTACT INFORMATION: Aspen Club Lodge Properties c/o Northridge Capital LLC 1101 30th Street, NW, Suite 150 Washington, DC 20007 1.202.625.7890 NAME, COMPANY, ADDRESS, PHONE, EMAIL SUMMARY Trip Generation Trip Mitigation NET TRIPS TO BE Peak Hour Max Trips Generated MMLOS TDM Total Trips Mitigated MITIGATED PM 5.3 25 0.56 25.56 0.00 Narrative: Click on the "Generate Narrative" Button to the right. Respond to each of the following prompts in the space provided. Each response should cover the following: 1. Explain the selected measure. 2. Call out where the measure is located. 3. Demonstrate how the selected measure is appropriate to enhance the project site and reduce traffic impacts. 4. Explain the Enforcement and Financing Plan for the selected measure. 5. Explain the scheduling and implementation responsibility of the mitigation measure. 6. Attach any additional information and a site map to the narrative report. Project Description In the space below provide a description of the proposed project. The Project Applicant proposes to demolish and replace the existing Sky Hotel with a mixed-use, hotel structure. The existing hotel contains a total of 90 lodging units, approximately 5,259 SF of commercial net leasable area, and a 13 car subgrade parking garage. The proposed hotel will result in 2 new affordable housing units and 14 new lodging units. MMLOS In the space provided call out the effective sidewalk width and the percentage of the site which meets or exceeds the minimum standard width. Explain the site constraints for - areas which do not meet the minimum width. All sidewalks are a minimum width of 8 feet. The effective width is not always 8 feet (ie. when the sidewalk abuts the building). In the space provided desicribe what new landscaping is proposed and how the proposed landscaping plan enhances the pedestrian experience. This measure is only applicable to large scale projects and requires more extensive landscaping then a few plantings or lawn area. The project shall establish extensive landscaping which significantly benefits the site and improves the pedestrian comfort and experience. The site plan and streetscape are organized to create an inviting pedestrian environment including generous, clearly defined sidewalks that connect meaningfully to the neighborhood and provide clear, safe circulation. The streetscape achieves a plaza-like character through the use of high-quality materials, terraced and vegetated seat walls, pedestrian-scaled paving, seating areas, bike racks, ski racks and similar. These features combine to create a truly dynamic pedestrian experience that is equally artful, environmentally sustainable, and functional, with particular attention given by the design team to make the streetscape, lobby and portals to the pool terraces above feel public and inviting. The planting pockets, planters and terraces create a diversity of buffers and are scaled to respond to the adjacent character of Aspen Mountain, creating a green environment that pitanrIc frnm tho ma,int:in in,-1 intn tho rivir frinomc nf tho rihi Thpic nlintinac r-nitioitp rimnff nrnvirle charling nf hArrl,r:no foilirm, nffor A rliworcihi nf wicilit hliffore tn noichhirc Explain the proposed improved crosswalk and how this improvement benefits the pedestian experience and the site as a whole. An improved crosswalk includes measures such as incorporating a corner bulb out or defining a crosswalk path with colored concrete. Simply re-striping a crosswalk will not recieve credit. This measure must be pre-approved by City staff. A significant portion of the alley is completely reconceived, changing it from an asphalt, car-intensive environment to a primarily pedestrian through-court with pedestrian paving, rain gardens and more. It remains utilitarian in nature while providing access for emergency and service vehicles and limited residential parking only. The adverse impacts of service and parking are mitigated creating an attractive open space amenity. Additionally, a significant streetscape enhancement and corner sidewalk bulb-out is included at the northwest corner of the project including detached sidewalk, street tree, ada ramps and pedestrian paving. Describe the enhanced pedestrian access point(s). This measure is to improve pedestrian access to the site from the ROW. It includes adding additional access points which prevent pedestrians and bicyclists from crossing a street, improvements to the project's ADA ramps in the ROW, and improvements to existing access points. Multiple ada-compliant access points are provided throughout the project and streetscape, and are proposed where they previously did not exist. Include any additional information that pertains to the MMLOS plan in the space provided below. Enter Text Here TDM The project proposes onsite amenities. Describe the combination of amenities below. Providing a combination of creative onsite amenities reduces the need for SOV trips throughout the day. Services within the development that will reduce the need for auto trips include grocery, restaurant, recreation rental, dry cleaning, child care, bicycle repair stations, etc. A combination of amenities is required. ski lockers, ski shop, bar/cafa on roof(s) Explain the proposed end of trip facilities strategy below. The provision of convenient facilities for pedestrians and cyclists encourages these types of alternative modes, thus reducing SOV trips. Non-residential projects may provide facilities such as showers, secure bicycle lockers, personal lockers, changing spaces, etc. showers, lockers Include any additional information that pertains to the TDM plan in the space provided below. Enter Text Here MMLOS Site Plan Requirements Include the following on a site plan. Clearly call out and label each measure. Attach the site plan to the TIA submittal. Sidewalk Width and Buffer Width Slopes Between 8ack of Curb and Sidewalk Landscape Plan Crosswalk Improvement (s) 2% Slope at Pedestrian Driveway Crossings Enhanced Pedestrian Access Point Pedestrian Directness Factor (See callout number 9 on the MMLOS sheet for an example) Bicycle Parking Enforcement and Financing Provide an overview of the Enforcement and Financing plan for the proposed transportation mitigation measures. A Public Facilities + Public Infrastructure Financial Guarantee is included within the Sky Hotel Subdivision/PD Development Agreement. Scheduling and Implementation Responsibility of Mitigation Measures Provide an overview of the scheduling and implementation responsibility for the proposed transportation mitigation measures. Please refer to the Construction Management plan, included as an exhibit in this application. Monitoring and Reporting Provide a monitoring and reporting plan. Refer to page 17 in the Transportation Analysis Guidelines for a list of monitoring plan requirements. Components of a Monitoring and Reporting Plan should include (1) Assessment of compliance with guidelines, {2) Results and effectiveness of implemented measures, (3) Identification of additional strategies, and (4) Surveys and other supporting data. Not applicable; as the mitigation measures are primarily hardscape and will be implemetned per plan and confirmed upon issuance of Certificate of Occupancy. We anticipate no I further monitoring will be required. 'Lj i 1 DURANT 5TREET LEGEND [EEmE] 7rM eASEMENT rowland+broughtort , AWIDTHMIN. 3TRIAN EASEMENT -u~/uN~ de.~/fnfanud.I <'+~~12TE3-~~ ~~ |MAX,ICROSS-SLOPE -Â·, - Â·Â·- 5' SETBACK 234*IÂ»pkJ,ie~ ~830W,k,il i~â€¢200 9-43-JUE.3114, L 22_, upon,â‚¬c *1 demucÂ¢0 80202 970544 .. D 003.30~1373 0 " 1 Â·14%&~21 1 1\ (11 @7064484.' *.la. f NOTES _1_ 949~ -1-1- t .'SET,ACK- 29. 7 E 1 1 1, LAYOUT DIMENSIONSAR"ROM THE *CKOFCURB 44. 6 v t _ UNLESEOTHERWISESTATED, COD,-4 P DESTRIAN.FRIENDLYALLEY = D S GN PE~STR~ SCA~O 0 - ~4 fÂ©. ' / 41 .1--,1 -er k il P VI~'G,80.LARDS LIGHTING 300-Ul= CHATEAU 970.429,74990 a,pen,â‚¬0 8!611 970.429.9499' DUMONT www.bluegreellaspen.com 8Â· WIDTHi l .A- - TY ~SEMENT , _- 10.8' W]DE DRAINAGE AND MAX 2% CROSS- - SLOPEONALÂ·IÂ· | ~E - 4 0=1 21 fi~Â·.;i~ Â·- - 18 WIDE PRivAI. NON-E<CLUS[VE 1/FA ;54 ;19--- 1 i| CHATEAUCHAUMONTAN[>CHATEAU MNGRES5/EGRESS EASEMENT FOR 07.14.15 DUMONT PLANNEDOEVELOPMENT WIDTH <6' IN THIS ~ }Ar~ --- DETAEEDREVIEWAPPL~CAT]ON UTILITY EASEMENT MAX 2% CROSS- 1 -- 11 SLOPE ON ALL | | (Ed D-11 9 ' 'lit 4 - pu BLIC PEDESTRIAN EASEMENT . IM -_11 - - 1% i.- 7- -. ALLEY ~ ~. ~ - 0730 1 PROPERTY LINE '4 0+3=, 2 tral-~1 PLANTER r- gG/1 ~32-==â‚¬-r" Ek â€ž 021 1-01 - 1 LEI I 0, â€¢~,iro KF~36=m' L_J O 1 ~ W-$75p7).Tr-1 I ~- L:' |t --J tl--J 1 1 1 - 111 GLORYHOLE CONDOMINIUMS i o GÂ·r-21 .IC ,_,_,yu7..JÂ·~__rL,Â£6-PC<1.-_.,ru~..â€ž--B--J1.11 W 357 LF , ....1 - 'Gn,~:-~-y-rn~~-1\-FT]--7-3 '~~, I -- SKY HOTEL 00 1 1 /1 1 18Â· wIDTH MIN: 11[ 268 IF A MAX 2% CROSSÂ· M Â·i -Â·-- EL - 0 . 1 . 1 ASPEN.CO61611 %*114 OL 10 0 709 E. DURANT AVENUE PRIVATE RESIDENCe irm<- - /4 Al I \ 1 / s,rele / / / / & 4 't cj *"47-*|5 WIDTH MIN: i 1-2 5 9,~,1~ i~ 1~ ~XISTIN~FLPSPA~NG 1 Fl~~J 11~ SLOPE \\\ \F)\ \\\- ilek - I'l '// - ') 1, 1 ,, ~~PROPERâ„¢ UNE * \ \ \ \ Â»- - ., l / If 8Â·WIDTH|MIN~ A--~FA L~L .ff~ 0 w-1 Fri .... MAX 2% CROSS- r\\f SLOPE ON ALL i. I --9-- -NORTH ADA RAMP = ~--~ :26 DWGFILE PROJECTNO 'C-CEDPED )~_-_ . I ACCESS POINT, j 21406 .PICAL >4<F-z _34__All Bel~ERIESS~HOTELd. .-Â·1733~ ASPEN ALPSCONDOMINIUMS SHEETTITLE I.Â£=&-/ 1 1 STREET LEVEL Iii>MiI-Wbal LAYOUT PLAN ['ITE PLAN | \ i ~GAmP] @RE/CKS ~ / PUBLIC PE*STR~AN EASEMENT 1 .-1 ~ SCALE: 5~2-â€ž - L l--4 -4 0---L- __|- r-1 -- ;- n L___[33 L200 - / - // N / , 14 PRELIM ARY ....W...B.K.---*eÂ»V- i ' 1 NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION SOUTH SPRING: , 4 Legal Tabs Co. 1-800-322-3022 Â© Stock#DO-10-S - EXHIBIT Sunny Vann E-1 Fronn: Jesse Swann <jswann@sopriseng.com> Sent: Thursday, February 05, 2015 3:49 PM - To: John Sarpa; Sunny Vann CC: Scott McHale Subject: Fwd: Sky Redevelopment Hello John and Sunny, As Scott mentioned in an earlier email we met with Aspen Fire earlier this morning and the meeting went well. Here is Brian's response to my summary of the meeting minutes I provided him via email. Regards, Jesse K. Swann, P.E. Project Manager Sopris Engineering, LLC 970-704-0311 - From: "Brian Nichols" <brian.nichols@aspenfire.com> To: "Jesse Swann" <iswann@sopriseng.com> Cc: "Scott McHale" <scott@rowlandbroughton.com> Sent: Thursday, February 5, 2015 4:04:19 PM Subject: Re: Sky Redevelopment Excellent summary, thanks, Brian On Thu, Feb 5, 2015 at 3:09 PM, Jesse Swann <iswann@soprisena.com> wrote: Brian, Thanks for meeting with Scott and I to discuss the Sky Hotel. Below I have provided a brief summary of key points based on my understanding of the meeting: 1. In general, you perceived the reduction in building heights, elimination ofthe bulb-out along Spring Street and improvements within Dean Street Alley as positive design revisions. 2. The Dean Street alley improvements will provide additional horizontal clearances for fire trucks as compared to what exists today. 3. Vertical clearance requirements are 13.5' but you would like to request a minimum clearance of 14' to account for potential snow buildup. 4. The improvements within the Spring Street/Ute Avenue "cul-de-sac", as illustrated on the attachment, do not further impede fire truck turning movements as compared to existing conditions. 5. We should consider placing "No Parking" signs along the north curb line of the Ute Avenue/Spring Street turn around area (refer to attachment for clarification). 6. You mentioned that as long as we can demonstrate that the proposed improvements do not further impede fire truck turning movements that we will not be required to perform additional improvements. 1 attachment) although as long as we don't further restrict this area with obstructions/improvements you will accept it as an "as-is" condition. 8. The design team will provide you with final drawings for your review and approval prior to building permit - Please let me know if you don't agree with my synopsis and/or would like to add additional information. Thanks again for taking the time to discuss this project with us. Regards, Jesse K. Swann, P.E. Project Manager Sopris Engineering, LLC 970-704-0311 Brian Nichols Fire Marshal Aspen Fire Protection District 420 E. Hopkins Aspen, CO 81611 brian.nichols@aspenfire.com 970-925-5532 "The signficantproblems weface cannot be solved at the same level of thinking we were at when we created them." - Albert Einstein Please don't print this e-mail unless you really need to. Under Colorado's Open Records Act (CORA), all e-mails sent by or to us on this District-owned e-mail account may be subject to public disclosure. PRIVACY NOTICE -- This electronic message transmission contains information from the Aspen Fire Protection District that may be confidential or privileged. If you are not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution, or copying of this communication is prohibited. If you have received this communication in error, please notify us immediately, and please delete the original message. -- Scanned by Postini -- aspenfire.com -- 2 1 1 Z 11 0 g .~IDA~M' T- K.- X0(li \2 =7\ / Llearrncc ' 3' ' Â·3[ 1 2, 1 11 DMn,00â‚¬TACM' / 5UBDIV151ON , 4â€ž~ ill -i0= 1 r 1 AD..... ..A DED PLAT OF / 510202 / . .1- 0 7 - ,~0,{ir. LINâ‚¬ / .in./.1.1.. 7/ CHATEAU DUMONT tODGE * REC. #133329 VAR .. 1 t., I - M.A '# h u,,o,c..wa.u 11,1 ..1' 1 44 1 64 ARLA.... 1 0 ,â„¢r,pAWA~,0,[,ta I All./. . ....0â€ž... 11 11 ..K,1,0.,0 a L. 4-- SITE IMPROVEMENTS LEGEND : iNt 1 1 & AU!Â¥- HJ C # / I. 0./.....E 1 1/Â»t. .. --- rCEâ„¢CK ' e.t,V., .~ '-1-- 4/0/2#*.-* I ./Dtri./wil 1/ ItleA~laWAI -ir...ir 1 ; It W,rHINS!1~4Â£1~ . i '00'Te, - iD.k,Mi,w.IM % S#.1.Im wicÂ»,a 11."C, . 4- f A g 5 k Well~â€¢0 ~IBrian Nichols hos concerns 4.----f~i - *# . __ i---,--'-*------4 Ans# =Â¥V -# .â€ž2'.1 WrCHet' 1)*11{, , pilh this exisling bu'b-out but , r .5- *G'. 4'/-3 -1 \4241:.*\ N liell thal as long as wa don'[ -1 /. # , - *w,c,*rs *-- N ** . L â€¢ 8 .ON-,e.wili - ~ -- ' i,c.~i-.i --- ~ ~00 SKEGBY HOLD ER Milher con,IiÂ·Il this area vn,11 -----Â·--- c =-O,1 lura 5 REC.# improvements Â·.ve will d 1,0 '4 4 u,~[04-=*"-*'tut'~ON -' 4 '/'In//'.OU/11Â·//A ~ghligaterl to remove 11 :~ince 11 .t-,> '1"0.....0. - \~c, '~~Grion Nichols - GRAPHICSCALE is an existing condition --7 -- T "*EE requested Illnt url [C./W.W.M./.W '0~ - . ~COP,Side i placi,Yg "No =A-â€¢/INaâ€¢:swoâ€¢,m.w{D#*u 11...1 i rarking" signs olon[J .U:'.0," -- 1 I.hâ€¢ I h OE #,is cuib to prevenl UJ g further conaction r.- DATE FEB 5, 2015 Cal| biforl you dig, JOBNO. 14010 'Â»2?L:*B SHEET Cl MOB lON AMVNI#13Hd -OTI '9Nl~33NIDN3 SlydÂ° S .LNBINd01 3hl 131OH A>IS Â£ 51.NvilnENOD liAD I 4Â¥ld S S 1ValdE]ONOO NOIS301Â¥AldEDNOO 5 Legal Tabs Co. 1-800-322-3022 ~ Stock#DO-10-S 0 . .. EXHIBIT . 1 4 - -- -1 .-1 .: 1 -11 - g. 1 .... Ii,~>a-~h--111 ---11 i , 11. P I -Â·- â€¢.- 1 -1--- 9243--~,:g _f~Z~'1~~..z:Â·~,;-~-4-II.i:t~:"dÂ· , 4...r 71, -1 1 Â· AU - <,9-~ ...2*jT.-=- *:-:2 2- U.----â‚¬--5 '- -,Â·0 f:- .1*..irli~'.*57----/-22/75Â·2Â¥f.71/:-#I,-- 1.â‚¬Â·EA .-i -..f..I.J.-:~ 4..1.".5.41.1-1:..4. 4.~,9.-2 ,-,':~''f ~4:yeatÂ«144*f~*t-N=t,j~y. --rfeÂ·L .- 1404/44 :.9Â· ~~'~t'~~09Â·'-Â·~~''~~~~~~~&(b)Â·40#15-.- =-~E.-az'.*141 392 Â¥ --- - b.-*,7â€¢4Â·* 1 1/KEFT- 28Â·fi*#*IE+944* 21800.U- -- - :-Â· =arier=}, = 3 .â€¢ 4 404 -- 1 --33 1- - id -/--*--I ' -*...I' -ML'. 11 i f ..L"/I - 1 620 . 1 , - Â·. ,Â· , . '4 i. . -6.- g:.-G- - . 1 /.- :>.,6 . -1. - : : Li' I ./-#.m -1 jb..'- I P . - I - 4 .1 . / .4 . 4 -- - _W 1% 1. i., .,i . ~i. l, I~ r ~I 1 9 610 ... 1 -1 - .-_ / .1 M-.â€ž-.0-â€žI-â€ž-#â‚¬91'll//9"""1/'*'/W.*./'*Mit.ff#*,4.114*/'"*f"/*I+/*/I.-Iet'i'SA -mil*maim#*444'~TF, .1 " :> - . t.:a .1,10'L.,01-fle'.11-; 'b'* S 1 .. . --I. ...- -... ... Standard Features At a Glance Max. standard width 30'4" (9246 mm) The 610 and 620 Series. The Ult Max. standard height 28' (8534 mm) Curtain 22 ga. galvanized steel up to 18'4" (4674 mm) width When your project calls for a rolling service door lit . (41 43.0 1* liti 20 ga. galvanized steel up to 25'4" (7722 mm) width that is as strong and durable as it is handsome f 4%4 1,49,1 1%{ r 2 947 't 24 ga. galvanized steel up to 15'4" (4877 mm) width and versatile, the 610 and StormtiteTM 620 Series - 3:i] A N*~ 93 flE * y#40 zÂ¥ b Â£ 41 1*11 fiet 18 ga. galvanized steel up to 30' (9144 mm) width are up to the task. Available to fit openings up to . Sil@443*4 1% y idit t~ 30'4" by 28' (9246 mm by 8534 mm), these doors Slat profile Curved, type C-187 (610 Series) Flat type F-265 are fabricated of 18- to 24-gauge galvanized steel (620 Series) (depending upon door width), and can withstand m:~L 1''~"'" '"r .-' <L'~ Finish Gray, tan, brown or white wind loads up to 20 psÂ£ Intel-locking slab with L; r ~' T I. 16 Hood 24 ga. galvanized steel endlocks ensure a tight fit while minimizing FJ.?1111.7"' L , J L 9.- , ' lateral movement. I."I' n/ r Wind load 20 psf IL,Â·Â· 1,i,',' i,i' T"ii'LI'|'i Standard mounting Face of wall .P- I 1 , 1 1 Design versatility is afforded by the widest array Operation Manual push-up up to 84 ftz.Â·(7804 mmD or 12' x 7' of options in the industry, including a selection 11 n. 11 - -~-FTFâ€ž-1 (3658 mm x 2134 mm) of slat profiles; curtain materials, finishes and .16- .r Â· 1 1. Chain hoist over 84 ff. (7804 mmO or 12' x 7' colors; electric operation, and special features .1 1 .1,11.i (3658 mm x 2134 mm) for unique applications. Each of our rolling S'.AL' Â·" Â·'. - .. .. L Standard springs 20,000 cycle service doors is computer-designed for precise 11â€ž 1 .1 r . 1.1 Ty }f. 11 11111'fl,111111,11.. fitting of components, simpler installation, lower Mw 'Tr~.,â€¢â€ž 1, 1,-â€ž11.:11/Â·. Weatherseals Bottom bar astragal (Series 610/620) maintenance costs and trouble-free operation for EN-2.-22,JA. 41 bul Guides and hood baffle (Series 620) life. The result is a door tough enough to perform Guides Primed steel exceptionally well in demanding industrial m bar Extruded aluminum w/weatherseal to 15'4" (4877 mm) environments - and handsome enough to meet Back-to-back steel angles w/weatherseal > 15'41 (4877 mm) exacting aesthetic requirements. Lock Interior slide bolt on push-up Chain keeper on chain hoist The 610 Series. The Best-Selling Door of Our Warranty 24-month limited; Rolling Steel Line. 3 years/20,000 cycles limited on Overhead Door The 610 Series is a perennial best-seller for good door and operator system reason. Its standard features exceed the norm for quality, and a myriad of options allows true customization. Options The 610 is built with a standard galvanized steel curtain, or an optional stainless steel or aluminum curtain. The standard â€¢ Electric operator (RHXÂ®, RSXÂ®, RMXÂ®) or crank operation curtain slat is the attractive C-187 profile up to 15'4" (4877 Â· Bottom sensing edge, sloping bottom bar mm) wide, and C-275 is standard over 15'4" (4877 mm). The â€¢ Galvanized steel bottom bar angles and guides C-275 and flat F-265 slats are available with perforation or Â· Between-jamb mounting fenestration options for air and light infiltration. Finishes Â· Stainless steel or aluminum slats range from 197 standard powder-coat colors or matched to Â· High-usage package high-wind load option (FBC, TDI, DADE)* your specification (optional) for steel slats, to No. 2b or No. â€¢ Cylinder lock 4 mill finishes for stainless slats, clear- or bronze anodized â€¢ Exhaust ports finishes for aluminum curtains. A host of other options Â· Flat slat profile option (610 Series) - including motor operation, pass doors, exhaust ports, â€¢ Perforated 18-gauge steel slats with 1/16" (2 mm) diameter holes on between-jambs mounting, cylinder locks and special usage 3/32" (2 mm) centers packages - allow the 610 to be adapted to any environment. â€¢ Fenestrated slats with uniformly spaced openings of 5/8" x 311 (16 mm x 76 mm) or 1" x 10" (mm x mm) on Â£265 slat only The StormtiteTM 620 Series. An Airtight Solution for , PowderGuardâ„¢ premium powder coat paint finish in 197 standard Heavy-Duty Applications. colors, or color-matched to specification The Stormtiteâ„¢ 620 Series is an ideal choice for keeping â€¢ PowderGuard TM Zinc and PowderGuardâ„¢ Weathered finishes climate-controlled air in and the elements out. Like the 610 â€¢ Special application doors: Series, the Stormtiteâ„¢ 620 offers the option of a steel, stainless - Oversized doors to 1500 ft: (139.4 mp steel or aluminum curtain in an array of finishes and colors. Combination doors with grilles and/or with full or partial standard, For enhanced thermal efficiency, the 620 is furnished with erforated or fenestrated slab flat slat profiles only, as well as weatherstripping on the - park-resistant doors, Craneway doors, Pass doors exterior side of the guides, on the bottom bar and a hood baffle. Additional weatherseals are available as options on the * FBC - Florida Building Code; TDI - Texas Department of Insurance; interior side of the guides and hood lintel. DADE - Miami-Dade Building Code Compliance Office .r : ..,R.:.f =:;Â¢tpeÂ·Ret,er?-3:F>nH F :22Â£4~.. ;*fEr' ~ ElÂ·&0 ././.Ir-:â€¢~;Â»t .F ... Â·1 -â€¢I â‚¬~I Â· .9 Â·' ' : ' ' ' ~~~Rolling ServiceDoor Systems -' -- SERIES 610 620 nate Door for Strength, Versatility and Good Looks. ....,IÂ· Series 610 C-187 Slat F-265 Slat FE-265 Slat 26, 2 58 1 7/32Â·-1 - L C - C-275 Stat C-600 Slat 1- 22-2 4 13/8Â·-{ 7/8 ~ * . Series 620 F-265 Slat Â· - ------ 25/8 4,4, . --- - -- - ...... - L C <P . , Installation and Service: Overhead Door Company of Longview Finish Details Standard Polyester Base Coat: Two-coat system with poiyester based top coat. PowderGuardâ„¢ Premium Weather resistant polyester powder coat available in 197 colors; custom color match and Powder Coat: EZ Clean treatment options available. See Tiger Drylae RAL Colors* brochure for color selection. PowderGuardâ„¢ Zinc Finish: Zinc enriched powder coat provides excellent corrosion protection that outperforms both hot dipped and cold galvanized steel. Color selection from 197 powder coat colors; custom color match also available. PowderGuardâ„¢ Industrial textured powder coat provides a thicker, more scratch resistant coat for added Weathered Finish: product protection. *Powde,Guard- Premium Powder Coat colors are Tiger Drylac' or similar. Special Doors for Special Applications. Low Maintenance, Maximum Field Serviceability. For special applications requiring herculean size and strength, The 610 and 620 Series are built for long-lasting service with ' consider the 610 Series door with C-600 slats. This non-insulated, low maintenance requirements. Steel guides, brackets and hood oversized door fits openings up to a maximum 1500 square feet enhance door life. Steel curtains are factory-finished with a rust- (139.4 mt), in widths up to 70' (21,336 mm) and heights up to inhibited roll coating process that incorporates a baked-on primer 30'4" (9246 mm). The curtain is crafted with 6" x 1 3/8" (152 mm and polyester top coat to eliminate field painting and improve 35 mm) curved, 18, 16 or 14-gauge steel slats for unparalleled finish life. Aluminum slats are offered with mill or anodized ength and durability. A variety of other special usage packages finishes for-long-lasting good looks. (Stainless steel in mill finish e also available for the 610 and 620 Series, from high-cycle and #2B or brushed #4). Overhead Door commercial operators are high-wind load to combination, spark-resistant and craneway built to meet the exacting specification of our rolling service doors doors. to provide precise and reliable door operation for years to come. For additional information, or special project requirements, consult your Overhead Door Distributor or the Overhead Door Architecturat Design Manual. , The Original, Innovative Choice for Unequalled Quality and Service Overhead Door Corporation pioneered the upward-acting door industry, inventing the first upward- acting door in 1921 and the first electric door operator in 1926. Today, we continue to be the industry leader through the strength of our product innovation, superior craftsmanship and outstanding customer support, underscoring a legacy of quality, expertise and integrity. That's why design and construction professionals specify Overhead Door Corporation products more often than any other brand. The Overhead Door Red Ribbon is a mark of quality that also reflects the pride we take in the people who support our products. Our family of over 400 Overhead Door Distributors across the country not only share our name and logo, but also our commitment to excellence. Your Overhead Door Distributor will work with you in a consultative role to ensure that product selections achieve your design and application requirements - in addition to offering expert installation, professional field service and ongoing maintenance. From project design and manufacturing to installation and service, the Overhead Door Red Ribbon is your guarantee of genuine quality and turnkey service excellence. Together with our distributors, we offer comprehensive technical information and resource materials to support your project, including: â€¢ Architectural Design Manual - a comprehensive guide to selecting, specifying and detailing all commercial and industrial Overhead Door products can be found at www.OverheadDoor.corn/ADM/base.html â€¢ Operation & Maintenance Manual - detailed product information, customized for your project, to ensure reliable, long-life door system operation Â· Custom application and technical assistance through ordering plants' customer service and technical services respectively â€¢ Visit our Architect's Corner at www.OverheadDoor.com - ././prMFÂ· FLE--/77111/I .V '~ ' - Ct. 1*Â·=C-Â·,-~,1, -, . -- 1 -,16 Fle#. 1 i:Â·ff#@ ~ 14*lim -Ill-iqi- . .EZZEI -Â· -2 r le~ ~ 7 z z= 1.9, ./51I/3/151 : #tr- Advanced Rolling Steel Door Thermacore Sectional Doors RolIing & Side Folang Rot/ing Service Doors Commercial Operators RapidSIaf Security Grdies & Closures Today, Overhead Door Corporation - along with our Horton Automatics division, for automated pedestrian entrances - is recognized as the leading, single-source manufacturer of integrated door and operator systems for commercial, industrial and residential applications. With multiple manufacturing locations throughout the United States, a state-of-the-art TREQ (resting, Reliability, Engineering, and Quality) Center for design and engineering, and a national network of authorized Overhead Door Distributors, our capabilities are leading-edge and our field service and technical support second to none. Built best and backed best, Overhead Door is the industry's leading choice for quality that shows and lasts. To talk with the Overhead Door Distributor nearest you, call 1-800-929-DOOR. Overhead Door Corporation 1/iki<W*7933//9/.3:i,4 2501 S. State Hwy 121 Bus., Suite 200 .â‚¬01~m--~~--)+4./ D Lewisville, Texas 75067 )Â® 1-800-929-DOOR INDUSTRY LEADING COMMERCIAL & INDUSTRIAL SOLUTIONS www.OverheadDoor.com The Overhead Door Corporation family of quality commercial and industrial products includes The Genuine. The Original. Hotton A part of Sanwa Holdings Corporation Â©2013 Overhead Door Corporation Overhead Door, Thermacore, RHX, RSX, Fire Sentinet, RapidSIat and the Ribbon logo are registered trademarks of and CDX is a trademark of Overhead Door Corporation. Knock & Lock is a registered trademark of Kenneth E Nachreinen A# other trademarks are property of their rightful owners. Constent with our policy of continuing product :mprovement, we reserve the right to change product specifications without notice or obligation. C900-103 1.5M 1/13 JAR THE CITY OF ASPEN Land Use Application Determination of Completeness Date: July 17.2015 Dear City o f Aspen Land Use Review Applicant, We have received your land use application for 709 E Durant - Planned Development - Detail Review and Commercial Design Final Review and have reviewed it for completeness. 01 Your Land Use Application is incomplete: Please submit the following missing submission items so that we may begin reviewing your application. No review hearings will be scheduled until all of the submission contents listed above have been submitted and are to the satisfaction of the City o f Aspen Planner reviewing the land use application. 4 Your Land Use Application is complete: If there are not missing items listed above, then your application has been deemed complete. Please submit the following to begin the land use review process. 1) Digital pdf o f the application. Other submission items may be requested throughout the review process as deemed necessary by the Community Development Department. Please contact me at 429-2780 if you have any questions. TFank You, A (' 6.Â·U U UN,/ 9 fnflu- < J*sica GarrowJ iong Range Planner \Vity of Aspen, Community Development Department For Office Use Only Qualifying Applications: Mineral Rights Notice Required New PD Yes No Subdivision, or PD (creating more than 1 additional lot) GMQS Allotments Residential Affordable Housing Yes No Commercial E.P.F. Lodging 2-161- \9 -2 -30 -00\ 00*5 Â· 20816& LM 2 1 Permits.11.1~ file Edit Record Navigate Fgrm Reports Format Iab Help Ii@3*)41/411 Igge -@ 9 3 3 +13'3% a , 4.0 1 ~ ~Custom Fields IRogting Status |Fee Summary ;Actions |Routing ilistory 1 Pennit type ~ m Aspen Land Use Per,nit # 0065.2015.ASLU . 1*4.. Â· Ii:: Â¢Â·'4: Address 709 E DURANTAVE Ap#Suite City ASPEN State Fco.i Zip 81611 1/'/4/*/1-....1?mJEFU-Â·:R' Pennit Information , ..'... Â· 9.'.t;Gr, FSFF.110lm-MA Â· .77-/ 1.. '0'.:.r..i.,B'/filillâ€žFlm! *M..MEFÂ·': Master permit Routing queue aslu 15 Applle[ 01/15/2015 9 .1 -t*:A':r~''M?.0 4*2 Projed **' Status Pending Approved ..i ..4 4 .:1 429 w Description APPLICAT1ON FOR SKY HOTEL REDEVELOPMENT Issued 91 411 @6 i Closed/Rnal 1%@i i ~ Submitted SUNNY VANN 925 6958 Clock ~ Days El Expires 01/09/2016 ~ Submited via v i Owner Last name ASPEN CLUB LODGE PROF First name 1000 POTOMAC ST NW 150 Phone (202) 625-7890 Address WASHINGTON DC MD 20007 f i Applicant U Owner is applicant? El Contractoris applicant? Last name SKY HOTEL , First name 709 E DURANT ~IJJI, ASPEN CO 81611 Phone (970) 925-6760 Cust # 25]96 -" Address Email *2& ' p Lender ! - Last name First name Phone C) - Address |AspenGold5 (server angelas ~'1 of 1 Okylf gr le (0 9 WOK,1 4 9-50 . 04 -F 40'8 8%/4 l eicEN SP!.no~ ~ xoqlool| | sdno.10 qul ~~212211.u~'=%14Â£2~2*liliu4=~i.L~~--_ ~ ~ ,~ 4' 47'4, 1141 39