The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutLand Use Case.701 W Main St.0019.2005.AHPC---Ii _701 W Main St Major Concept & Variancni 273512446004 Case 0019.2005.AHPC 56 44 â€ž 4 , i</5 \ 6342 4 b jH 1 Ii-=--.Il-..I.=....1... .. City of Aspen Community Development Dept. CASE NUMBER 0019.2005.AHPC PARCEL ID NUMBER 2735-12-4-46-004 PROJECT ADDRESS 701 W MAIN ST PLANNER AMY GUTHRIE CASE DESCRIPTION MAJOR DEVELOPMENT; CONCEPTUAL AND VARIANCES REPRESENTATIVE MARSHALL&SUSAN OLSEN 925-3628 DATE OF FINAL ACTION 10/17/200: CLOSED BY Denise Driscoll GARFIELD & HECHT, P.C. Ms. Joyce Allgaier September 28,2005 Page 2 Thank you, in advance, for your consideration. Should you have any questions or require any additional information respecting this correspondence, please contact the undersigned. Respectfully, GARFI~LD *ECHI, PC. yhn D. Belkin TW:spb eC: Linda Wachner (via facsimile delivery) .. E d EE88'ON 11VSV8 1HDaH 013ld@VD Wdtlit 9008 088'des .. u Til 1 1- 6- -- I. 1 DIe Edit Eecord Way*ate Farm Reports Format Iab tielp Module Heip v 0 Wil.: iN M :> M .J .*~.~* . I Â·*24> , Â¥ $ 9 0 b !3 Clear 1 Conditions { Subfermit 1 Yaluation ~ Public Comment 1 Attachments Main ~ Routitig?Status } Arch/Erg } Paice!$ ~ Custom Fjelds } Fee; ~ Fee Summary j Actions ~ Routing Histofy , Petmit Type ~ahpc Â· 1Aspet,Hi. t:: r!,7 Land Ijse 2004 Pe,mit It |00192005AHPC Address ~701 W MAIN ST -~ Apt/S u,te f City ~ASPEN State lEd-3 Zp 181611 21 Petmit information r~-)A- -i. .- r.#E - Master Permit ~0003.2005AHPC Routing Queue ~ahpc Applied m 05/18/2005 { p'Olect I S tatus {pending Â»w~U, 3 DetÂ¢,iption ~MAJOR DEVELOPMENT. CONCEPTUAL AND VARIANCES Issued I Final ~ Submitted ~MARSHALLLSUSAN OLSEN 925Â·3628 Clock f:wÂ·,rvi,Ii Days F-7 Expi~es {65/13*66Â£ 1 -A FÂ°* Visible on the web? Permit 10- 1 34238 Owner Last Name [OLSEN q Filst Name |MARSHALL G & SUSAN A ,2030 N SEDGWICK UP>0< -- CHICAGO }L 60614 P- 4 - -3 9 3 -, 5 F.4 E ~ ~ - - - n i G E}14, 3.-4 If you try to provide an adequate breath sample but you are unable to, the BAT will make a note of it in the "Remarks" section of the form and immediately inform your supervisor. You will be directed by your supervisor to obtain an evaluation by a licensed physician. They physician will provide an opinion on whether or not a medical condition has prevented you from providing the breath sample. 8. Release of Results. The results of your alcohol test or tests will not be released to others unless you expressly authorize the release or unless required by law. For example, the City may release the results of your alcohol test/s to your next employer if you furnish the City a letter authorizing the release of the results. The City will not release test results unless you specifically request the release IN WRITING. The City may make the authorization for release of previous records a requirement for employment. B. Drug Testing Procedures. 1. Which Drugs. The required testing program is limited to five types of drugs: marijuana, cocaine, opiates, amphetamines, and phencyclidine. 2. Testing Conditions. All drug testing must be done from urine specimens collected under highly controlled conditions. Specimen collection procedures require a designated collection site; security for the collection site; chain of custody documentation; use of authorized personnel; privacy during collection; integrity and identity of the specimen; and transportation to the laboratory. 3. Certified Laboratories. Driver protection is built into the testing procedures. The only laboratories than can be used are those that have been properly certified. 4. Tests. After the urine specimen has been collected and forwarded to the laboratory, two tests may be performed. The initial test is the immunoassay test. This is a screening test to determine drug usage for the five classes of drugs. The second test is a confirmation test. 5. Initial Test. If the results of the initial test are negative, the testing laboratory will advise the City's Medical Review Officer (MRO) that the drug test for the driver was negative. No additional tests on the specimen will be done. 73 . 0 . -2. 0 1 D ' gÂ»1-20641.0, 09 /24 /0 U / 1 1 / 1 /1 ;; A A d-'J62Â«p Y l tu. Date: Cashier's Check Amount: 410 1 000Â·00 Bank: To: Attn: Historic Preservation Officer Check Number: City o f Aspen 130 S. Galena St. Aspen, CO 81611 Property Owner: Subject Property Street Address: 70 1 W , fls,21 St , Aspen, CO 81611 Subject Property Legal Address: 6,0 -19 14 42 C 125&9 4407 utt-Â¢235+ 2.'as>-A+ 4-- 0-1- Â·14 , 05(00# 11/ 0-1-l j -1-3 oututs Z 9 6-6- â€ž6 x The City of Aspen, as a condition of approval of certain land use approvals relating to the above referenced property, has required that the undersigned Owner of the above referenced property provide financial security to guarantee the performance of the following: 00 - 911-e IralotÂ».h.0 1-1 afl A- r.Â»L'll-â€¢ Fle#* Al=E. f&2*51(160-01 * a <2Â·21/1.24 of '2/DOE> . A copy of the relevant approvals is appended hereto as Exhibit "A" and by this referenced incorporated herein. The undersigned Owner of the above referenced property hereby provides a Cashier's Check made payable to the City of Aspen as, and for, the financial security required by said land use approvals. The City o f Aspen may deposit the Cashier' s Check in a non-interest bearing account of the City of Aspen. The City of Aspen may make withdrawals from said deposit at any time in its sole discretion upon notification by the City's Community Development Director to the City's Finance Director and to Owner that Owner has failed to perform one or more conditions of the land use approvals o f the City o f Aspen Historical Preservation Commission. Wlithin thirty (30) days of the ~2â‚¬06â‚¬FIR-ce of the work to be performed by Owner in accordance with the aEkege ferenced 1*(d u~g,*fyrovalf, the balance of Owner' s deposit, if any. shall be returned to Owrievideev~. thapf~Owner's balance is not the subject of litigation. 1\ C IPW- saved: 6/7/2005-281-G:\iolin\word\agr\HPC-Cashiers-Check.doc .. RESOLUTION OF THE ASPEN HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION GRANTING APPROVAL FOR ON-SITE RELOCATION AND SETBACK VARIANCES FOR THE PROPERTY LOCATED AT 701 W. MAIN STREET, LOTS H :ind I, LESS THE WEST 2.35 FEET OF LOT H, BLOCK 19, CITY AND TOWNSITE OF ASPEN, COLORADO RESOLUTION NO. 6, SERIES OF 2005 Parcel ID #:2735-124-46-004 WHEREAS, the applicants, Marshall and Susan Olsen, have requested On-Site Relocation and Setback Variances for the cabin located at 701 W. Main Street, Lots H and I, less the west 2.35 feet of Lot H, Block 19, City and Townsite of Aspen, Colorado; and WHEREAS, in order to approve relocation, according to Section 26.415.090.C, Relocation of a Designated Property, it must be determined that: 1. It is considered a non-contributing element of a historic district and its relocation will not affect the character of the historic district; ill: 2. It does not contribute to the overall character of the historic district or parcel on which it is located and its relocation will not have an adverse impact on the historic district or property; or 3. The owner has obtained a Certificate of Economic Hardship; gr 4. The relocation activity is demonstrated to be an acceptable preservation method given the character and integrity of the building, structure or object and its move will not adversely affect the integrity of the historic district in which it was originally located or diminish the historic, architectural or aesthetic relationships of adjacent designated properties; and Additionally. for approval to relocate all of the following criteria must be met: 1. It has been determined that the building, structure or object is capable of withstanding the physical impacts of relocation; and 2. An appropriate receiving site has been identified; and 3. An acceptuble plan luis been submitted providing for the safe relocation, repair and preservation of the building, structure or object including the provision of the necessary financial security; and WHEREAS, for approval of setback variances, the HPC must review the application, a staff analysis report and the evidence presented at a hearing to determine, per Section 26.415.110.C of the Municipal Code, that the setback variance: a. Is similar to the pattern, features and character of the historic property or district; and/or b. b. Enhances or mitigates an adverse impact to the historic significance or architectural character of the historic property, an adjoining designated historic property or historic district; and .. 3 4. WHEREAS, Amy Guthrie, in her staff report dated February 9, 2005, performed an analysis of the application based on the standards, and recommended the application be approved with conditions; and WHEREAS, at a regular meeting held on February 9,2005, the Historic Preservation Commission considered the application, found the application to meet the standards, and approved the application by a vote of 3 to 1. THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED: That the HPC approves the on-site relocation of the cabin located at 701 W. Main Street, Lots H and I. less the west 2.35 feet of Lot H, Block 19, City and Townsite of Aspen, Colorado, in addition to Setback Variances, with the following conditions: 1. On-site relocation of the cabin to Lot A (the corner lot) is approved. Relocation of this building onto a new foundation, and rehabilitation of the structure must be the first action that is taken to redevelop this property. It will not be acceptable to move the building and "mothball" it, in favor of undertaking construction on the vacant parcel. 2. The front yard setback for the historic cabin must be 10 feet. A sideyard setback variance has been approved to allow the cabin to be 1'6" from the east property line, in part to avoid a conflict between the cabin and the large spruce tree at the front of the site. If the spruce tree is removed before the relocation of the cabin, then the variance is no longer in effect. 3. A structural report demonstrating that the buildings can be moved and/or information about how the house will be stabilized from the housemover must be submitted with the building permit application. 4. A bond or letter of credit in the amount of $30,000 to insure the safe relocation of the structure must be submitted with the building permit application. 5. A relocation plan detailing how and where the building will be stored and protected during construction must be submitted with the building permit application. APPROVED BY THE COMMISSION nt its regular meeting on the 9th day of February, 2005. Approved as to Form: David Hoefer, Assistant City Attorney Approved as to Content: HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION Jeffrey Halferty, Chair ATTEST: Kathy Strickland, Chief Deputy Clerk Ae -,geÂ« A.* -*IV- ,-% 'N=h A,Wâ€žb &,Aex - 4=Tch Â·=AN w : " | u* | THE BACK OF THIS DOCUMENT HAS AN ARTIFICIAL WATERMARK PRINTED IN A SPECIAL WHITE INK. 1[- '2 . 'I,.7.7.1 ~;.121.Li ,tj;.1.2 Z;;t H~LO~~~OCUMENT ATA SMALL ANGLE TO SEE THIS SECURITY FEATURE. 938980552 A VECTRABANK 1650 South Colorado Blvd. â‚¬3.ORADO Denver, CO 80222 Â¢~ REMITTER 10-86/220 ~ *tÂ·, M41:h:.Hi ?L.L OLSEN *1 7. g. 07. 2:-105 ~ PAY TO THE *JO.(:13Â·.1 .CIO- *t ***CITY OF ASPEN*** ORDER OF F Â« 0,3 Ah DOLLARS (f 3/:t *THIRTY THOUSAND ,nd 90/100*** US Dollarq DRAWER: V O ADO, N.A. RA B~~ - r i 474 12 6602 1-0.Â·,1 1,7 In!,0-atpri Payment S #stems Inc. Englewno,1 ColorÂ·ila ~ B GRA.'N_~ MA State) PÂ·.iff*. NY. . I:0 2 2000868I:68* 24 1006 9 38980 SS2 1 47-1 .I M : I l =a tâ€¢12 1 1 : Mâ€¢4.( el : { â€¢1 I l t 1â€¢11 :14.1â€¢1 21 :tkl â€¢I â€¢1â€¢11 1 '14 2 I * â€¢1 ; MO [ ti =4-114â€¢] I â€¢], [el. M il l M I 4%1 21 â€¢ Â»4' 5â€¢1â€¢1 I : 14'/ 1.1 â€¢1,11 â€¢1:1 1 :14 .I Mâ€¢1 / 14=1% i =[â€¢11 ; I tâ€¢] 1:1 21â€¢1 : M â€¢ 1 â€¢1,' I N l l : l : l I I cl :1 9 4-* li <â€¢1 21 =I N I 1 ; 1 =1 ~ 11,1 9 ~ 1 ~ -70 .,ELE '12 Mm,p i 5 A 4 - 1 A L. 7'N.C.'25 4,1 '41,4... Â· , -0 h. 1 * 4 ... I 4*, r - 1. -- ;-.:-4 4 .%.119# b ./. 31 34*, 1Â¥1. 414 . --2 . A rilÂ·' 1 .* . . . t Â· r* P. j'. , , ify 4 A 44 :,4/4.Â· 7,7.- . 1,9/ 76. 18% 0 â€žr ~ 2 1.= + ' / #F .-t - , 1--.Ill rte ' ..4- F.Â» 6. 6.0 .: .L .7 . 4 7 e 4 ., ,; f b.r i 1.9,21/A.hâ€¢li *t .;r &1 1 r %' . 4 - f.\ 1 Z** -'.'.'- Ml.f / ~-, ' P -/ t.' C -410) *4 Vibl .4 1 4 1. . 4 EL-L 111' r f. 1 t * , k i /1 4 -/'ll'.liL # ..I- 1.-:'. 129 * 1 4 ~4 11â€¢/ 2 * -/4.9 St' . - Itlig. 2.ral'-46 41 '0- =' - I. ... , 2,1 ,.' t.,2 F . C . Â· ~45 i' - : w B. 4-4--' 3 J l : .i~, 1 .- 1 --1 I r ....1 / '. 3 1-,>t -B J fÂ¥Â· - *. . rd . I I h. e.. 1 'th ) d *. : - ' '. I 1 $ I .'4' "91 *1 1 - ~* W i -- - - ./Al. 21 Nk ; 4/ 14.1 . .A /2 0 5 5< 7- i. . -6 4 . I 01 5- 1 , 4 7-4* 1 .t Â·i .JÂ· 4* ~ 32 1 6 V 4.2.- ..4. , : 1 A 4 .17 f 4. 1 3 . â€¢mrk r. 4 i. . Â¢,4 ~ 1 - -- illilillir I -~/ ./ 4/TE"/ 47 ' ' Â· . bY 4* F Â·014 /1- ' , . t., 1 P 1*:6/41 4. A. r 9. i * i fli f:' 4 f , 4â‚¬30 : 4.e w '15Â£*4 4*A Â« A ..K â€¢* .. 'i , r ..rn. 4% ' ' I .i .4 7. P t. ~1 1 11.1 ; tt' 1 <- 4.beay 391, . *p I A I. f J i '/&41/4/ +* * 9.- 7<. 1 > r. .4,44, 1/:.. 1'.. .1, Â· 4 N . Â· '12 .p; 2 E -9- fr,1 9. 4 . 04.,19 ,~2Â·'t. ~Lb 11 ..2â€ž44 - t,Ear.W 2-4 81,1 1 4$ *146/40?2~ ~ . t 2~9.. e m N/E -,7. ." ,AU, Â·,~ Â· Cti . 11, Â¥- 1.7,16 ./ '. 1.- I 434Â£42*4624*9#2-f/: - ..'i' 46 WL:! .081 - . 9\ , , f V.#fifirt a. 144 . ..4 â‚¬ G. , - 24* . I *%964 i i i, /'-4-12,22.ft/444/y,F; , 21â€¢ 1 41 . ,Â»'' # I 4 1 - ' 41 .Â» y Paragon Reports PagÂ©Â·.*TYof 22 / 1 i http://ags.fnismls.com/Paragon/barch/PrintReports.aspx?pg=m ~ 2/27/2006 . 1 f j 32#-.c:~T - Â· 1.,4 Â·â€¢? f 9.... W L' '0 f ' .3:1' : . '. ' '4.IMI t I U f . . , P , . .-4 1, 47-6 ~2, , -Â» 'U 1 - 4 .* Â· f - t. * ' Â£29*FA r , 9WZ Â· 'Â· < i r Â»4 & + 1 # 2%. * IL 4.29 6% 3 1.4 + 11' U & .1~. I <4 ': . .0, .' 4.,7 . ..i< 1, ' lilli . ' V. . . A-=7Â¥ ' 4 . -- , -I ' ",1 . , .1, 4 , , U.. 1 4.4. , /*Al Â· --, 1 L 13- '- /;' Al#fli 4 -- 4 , 9 | 'g, 4 . 1. 4. 11 c . 4.Â· .14* I /6/ .9 f 04 . â‚¬ %: ' I . 4* '~ ' 11 ?Â·. 1 1 ,, la , ;.-4, . .1 3 ..41. d,11/7 --- 1 Â· 4, Â·4 6.-' ........ ./ ..~../ .: .6 * . 4. 21"e 02 4.4 . E . .~-- '., Â·Â·Â·:,4# 3 M.Â·liÂ«.t: I J . ,..f 'eN Vâ‚¬ 4 IM -' 1 - ...i-nj-m 1. . ...L:â‚¬33:h , , 444*,T . 7. .. :1,7 > Â¥ u =. r.,1 1 0 -5- ' - . 1 . re r I .... - r -- .1 -1 l I.+ ) .' Â·t %&/45 91 - I â‚¬ fal . 4 1/ .~fillillillitt* ../-5 ~ Â· . ~ ./ , 1 .' ... I,' I. ~ ~ / 3 t.Kâ‚¬Â· 344 . 11 '7~L h. SU' 9,Â· * . 4,4% / â€¢ f t 4 '51,3... â€¢- Â· ~ M 1 1/ 1.211#/21 3 % : 1. Ii, 1 ,~r ' I ... - ./ 61" *- AX ' 1, i 1 , Â¥V , , wr. D, ** 2% . . 6494:I n ' , , '.-ff.2 624 -7\ 1 2. 7.. 1 . - 17.04*14.11.' 1 14,6., wrT.fp. A ' i .9.ZIMI ; Â·Â· 1/ ./ i" ' . b 1*79 , 4>, 4 ./.9,Â·9Â· '4~ Â· i.._$tl '*f~ 4 .Ami *r. 1 '*Tr * 0. 14; i . 7293' -~~A. 2 ::>03: 4,j:j';>~4~2*"31Â»~i ,,,,lp'?*42*67*94#9Â£41#A'.21*~~ - '~ t p -/Lq,4-Me Be 44 -: f ..'I . .: Paragon Reports Page 10 of 22 ./f//3 http://ags.fnismls.com/Paragon/Search/PrintReports.aspx?pg=m 2/27/2006 1 1 3 >24 COF]624 I 1 24 E al -I--- -- --, r-- -- I.-- il- < 11 11 11 11 Revised Cabin anf House Site Plan *El lili Paragon Reports Page 4 of 6 1 http://ags.fnismls.com/Paragon/Search/PrintReports.aspx?pg=m 2/27/2006 May 30 06,02:00p Hunter Conlwdion .2207041864 p.2 I 0 t TRANSMITTAL To: h.92 l *5Â¢ CL Date: 60- 23 -04 Number: A-51- - +20 --67Â¥31 Pages including cover: 3 Re: (19.Fic CAÂ·61,4 - 4,72+ Â« AA 474 0 1-14 A"/ 17 Af-<#w N o<J ,~P-â‚¬- -8 03-f . -17uo -1*vÂ·Â·k 46, ~ f*w M 1-#f N.m- M een * 4 . -- WcF- Al eeÂ© -1-D dial- dip_ V.JINÂ©ovas 6 Atee-â‚¬0 â€¢ WE LODJuo A l 65â‚¬- 12:> AA AÂ»â‚¬F A.4.- 4-â‚¬ C,Ut ..40 cal S c.~ UJew-r 5(OE fo-**E . 1-*e' <:3/Â·46= -61.5 -n 44 CA-J <-4.0000 -9421Â£ -32653 huyr- M#Trda -Wrâ‚¬ 3*f \-â‚¬ 01:5 h.of z>-rke*- lÂ»CALÂ¢03-0 C-4 T+E <fLed>,4 A.V.4.0 bug- C AA< N or AA 41-Stl- 11-- 62 Er* N evO W i AL Ookls, 3) C Wa ULD Â£-c Fc- -1-0 15 0.,196 -1-*e â‚¬ik< 3-n N.4- 80rd(/0 D O-z>,2- 6Â¥eN. r 'Â«4 1-25> -ntt 6*9ASâ‚¬OnON A-- 2 o upLE Â£* fiF:- -11 7116 re-Â«:leÂ¢11 ~T+ls Wl UL- Al,LOA)-6 Jl; tr M 0/:22/0,4-L- 6 L. 94 1 &-vt,2- B.40.terl- -rl,FA,4 -1--46 ':p,â‚¬.-e~/~ OU 1 6.- L 2'u. 4 ern,co A- 6 03 " p rÂ©,2 - 04 T*15 S 1-9 L.E- - ts l/(tsY2Â¥ C,1- Arvksc UE +243 A+4 -6-9-ag:-A h/Â»NInt deÂ· ~606â‚¬ 1-5 d'IGTA14, 1-*0â€¢Avp / PAM-- 1131 County Rd. 106 Carbondale, Colorado 81623 HUNTER Cell file) 379-0274â€¢hunter@sopris.net (970) 704-1860 â€¢ Fax (970) 704-1864 CÂ©*1841 [EN] 078Â©[N] CONTRACTING â€¢ MANAGEMENT â€¢ DESIGN May 30 06,01 59p Hunter Const,uction ~07041864 p.1 .. TRANSMITTAL To: IV\02325*Aul- Date: 6030-06 Number: 6-96(/ / 731 Pages including cover: Â£7â‚¬ Re: , 1-tfa- - <SE- 445 4 4 . 1% /4030â‚¬0 h- 999<) 14ssres -1-0 -tÂ·etâ‚¬66 fchziet,, 10'awn Wil*- =15. 5eKer- -CD -tlp<2- l.-#tyr- Wâ‚¬:ec, 3-91-e We.ntea- 6,+01(n.0 1â€ž1.884,6 2.04Aâ‚¬- 5-7Â»404<2-0 *5 47 LA 4 ters , C L.-ad FA A-< A-E 6 Â¢41% 45 ae 4,-Ass ~~) --~te>/ feeÂ·â‚¬ *Cem.ef i Â¥'le-C.E- aF <51 l.â€¢'MS (00 Ur* o..1 *r1O 4194_FfS 4 [-Ue'O Ort. 1159 M# el-,r-40 71 4 0 C *Â«ro intâ‚¬- 1,lftebl- S <De- - Lf u.) i 04Â£20~US - A.....co lâ€¢J--r-0 1-tff- A.93+ -t- 6 â€¢ drA 466-de- eÂ·,4Â£>S _ c cmÂ«-,1 6[Fi S o< . - l/M 46Â¥riA<4 A- 4640 61,4 -7-4=-3/ 0-4:G./fv ,400. 3~ 01-HE wh 400.0.5 A.2-e- A-U- u.) 000 - le,d:.t-,~eÂ© uJH71-5- 1*ty J i uu- l:+ph,45' Se-*ee-66 -*- 640-0.-â€¢u,ABE AVO Meet- 1-*E e.124-Gy Â£20Â© E , D -FHE ?,2.UL-*- ul c.u>,423 *r- 1-Â¥tâ‚¬ 60rS#viNe Mk--E- At-*-2*07' dÂ¢-Deâ‚¬Lâ‚¬:0. * 44 9- WtÂ£,4.. W.WE z*934â‚¬3> 10,00â‚¬ faL --ntâ‚¬ Two Ofe'.4 - CALA-5 lÂ·.1 56 ffeÂ·O '1/S-r,11 GL- â€¢ We- rfâ€¢We-- A- Sot,stt- ,F==9=,2- 7Â¥ff- rl:-r OjazDC> C..54 e,LeC> LJ , N. 0-0 CrL 74â‚¬ 9379< u#kul. 4.6040 05< A- â‚¬TD#-6* Sif#&, -t-2 - -Â¢2-- HUNTER ceil 970) 379-0274 â€¢ hunter@sopris.net 1131 County Rd. 106 Carbondale, Colorado 81623 (970) 704-1860 â€¢ Fax (970) 704-1864 30 [NI Â©7 [ma ELE OF 8 Â© NI CONTRACTING â€¢ MANAGEMENT â€¢ DESIGN # f & 4 ly.JN~tr- -rz> Tr?Late- -td Wink A '15* W,61.DOW I ./ -" 5 AM E Of - 8 < NEW ~DOWS 10 0 / NEW ~000 & GLASS ~LOCAIED ~6~ kNTCH EXISHNG EXISTING METAl L.>/ ENEY DOOR ---7 \&*15ANG WNDOÂ« ~ INSULATED-GEASS7---1 /7-ROOF e MEL=3 /1 \\ i!1 CEDAR - ilf \ )SURE) 1/ i ll"lte'2*te.Le \ 14)000 - tksÂ¢Mtevq-3 CEDAR \ u w.*-02 o.r N / 1 1 - 4' SMOOTH CEDAR TRIM IOARDS ! BOARDS v V G u*jrl> / NEW WOOD BEVEL SIDING FOR STAIM 1 A --3 7 10EIrci~ EXPOSURE) \\ 4Â· -- .UL 1. -I- ijA - --*-1 F t Â£2~1%5# i 1 1 '~~ 91 E Ell-1 -2, hi == . '- _,1 -_1E j, ..=!.1 / - d #ar- fi*t - '' Lic,r- 1 /14,2"L , T/PLYWD - -Â«41?;wv,- 7~~ - I [I li -I --r .~ + - Â· I- - -----9-----4.-.A--- i 1-- 1 1-13. 1 7 -1 / 1 1 ,1 1.-1 JIP--! , 1 ''/~ ~ UN / 1% 7 1 LINE OF 1 ' 0 /4 Ll, DOSTINC GRADE ~ _14 t i 4 iÂ· > IEEST!Â£*MNDOW A , - 1/.001. 0 ' *REMAIN bâ€¢w e f ./ U IE ENRY -1-'>F L.- ]1 / -*... 1 Â¢9]448 631.48 'tÂ¥(146 I .0 .tz kay )N GRADE ddliAL CONCRETE GRADE BEAU f,1 T/WALL 1*39 tz=y, 5/co 10#yr NA:Y ff' WALK TO 9...4..' ~ 1 1 1 6 8 i AND PIER FOUNDATION r. i' +93'-6" (990'-10") 1 IDEWALK , ( 86 A *46 - 44 '(71/ It 1, U I i LINE OF FOUNDATION - .......... ... BEYOND 1~ ' 11'11 & #1 i â€¢h FINISHED r- ' '' 4-bit f -Â£1 9 +90'-4. May 30 06 ,02:00p Hunter Construction 97~7~64 May 30 06 02:00p Hunter Construction 9707041864 p.4 EISK Â£.. 11 1 -0 thoue ' Dode 1 1 1 - +104-0- ./.E f...i ,. 01...J. I.1 1â€žZI -- - 9-ASS DOCI â€¢ 19 'DIA/ .-li "M -= 10 11.-0 .1... CAMI [â€¢Smâ€¢ 2,0.4 913# *u SÂ®#(FI OC. . E.1- 31- (0-4/r */- FACE EXPOD,B ..O-G ..ED : 1 - EN , -=-0~-5 2 i To IEIC 1 1 2 9-,-==,-=-,-,-=,-4=ZIZ-Z--IZIZZZIZZEZZEZIZZZ=ZI--=:2-=--rr----=-rd L. :rm '~~Â£~ENT L-_-J EB REVISED EAST ELEVATION WITH NEW BASEMENT 74' = 1'#1.- - EYISâ„¢C <AL 200/ 3>00 1 M RKâ‚¬ Oeaa...~~-dS 4-fuÂ»~m El 3J 11 I. 0 0 0.- f 410.-0 U U 00 *,0 90= i â€¢TH 'El leo E/ST,IC WMCCVS AND um DOOR â€¢ TO 114- 4- â€¢EW DOOR TO m/GED opt-G R~Ft CE OEINIC iZZ,-u, 1 100â€¢4 Cto* 0/7[1 Si," FORt 0008 â€¢ EK,sm,G wwom To E : 5[AN, 1.-1/7 e. FAa EXP'}WINE) 000..C .ST,09[0 *- 4. DJEDâ€¢ CED' TRW OSTNO -Do,k BOA?GS '0 REMAI F Ill*â‚¬0 BASEâ€¢â‚¬I T L.... l.- - , DA,dul*Â£1 --t"lf'fi-Ihjr'E-- 1-1-L.Â·aldSâ€¢ LE& -to USE A 6-rhrl DAÂ·72 D 6 1--6 U -t-*t.L 12.trrfe,2-- -TE+&.1 17*F OAE: ULA) S 60 Lbil 7*u- -bac,2.- 4/6- FleeD <L -1/Ggivt Ca E8 REVISED EAST ELEVATION WITH NEW BASEMENT ' A 1/4- = 1Â·-0- irailif 0 . Page I of 2 Amy Guthrie From: Amy Guthrie Sent: Friday, June 23,2006 3:30 PM To: 'Patrick Hunter' Subject: RE: Cabin, windows, cutsheets I talked this over with the Chair. These windows are not what we expected based on the plan notation "new windows to match existing.' Because they were ordered we willlet it go. Amy Guthrie City of Aspen Historic Preservation Officer 130 S. Galena Street Aspen, CO 81611 (p) 970-429-2758 (f) 970-920-5439 www.aspenpitkin.com From: Patrick Hunter [mailto:hunter@sopris.net] Sent: Monday, June 19, 2006 1:21 PM To: Amy Guthrie Subject: Cabin, windows, cutsheets Amy, Here are some cutsheets 1 have pulled together from a catalog and from Weathershield's architectural service. The photo in the bottom left hand corner of the catalog page is exactly the product we are getting. Sorry for the confusion. If I had known, I would have ordered TDL. These windows should arrive any day now. They can not be returned. These windows are 6 lights, as you asked for. The plans show them as 4 lights. but then these windows are taller than shown on the plans. I ordered to match the size of the one existing window that we are replacing. These windows are casements (side hinged and crank out to open). The two existing gable windows were casements and the boarded over window on the east wall was a easement. The little corner window in the east wall of the shed was boarded over (no glass). All of the other original windows are fixed. The new basement windows are casements. The basement windows are Pella with interior grilles (same as the Coach House). The new Weathershield windows are all wood. The muntin bars which are wood, of course (and inside and out), are adhered to the glass with 3M double stick tape. The bars do not normally come off. The moulding patterns are just like the TDL mouldings. The exterior easing will be the same 1 x4 painted wood that was used on the house before. I checked the approval letter. Cut sheets were requested on the doors but not on the windows. 6/23/2006 I am sure this kind ofthing comes up from time to time. I really think there needs to be some general guidelines and/or a checklist of specific concerns of the Aspen HPC. Most of the local building departments have had something like that for years. Best regards, Pat Hunter 6/23/2006 Page 1 of 1 Amy Guthrie From: Amy Guthrie Sent: Friday, June 23,2006 3:36 PM To: 'Patrick Hunter' Subject: RE: Cabin Siding I talked this over with the Chair too. The clapboards have to be natural wood and they should be smoothe sawn. Thanks for checking. Amy Guthrie City of Aspen Historic Preservation Officer 130 S. Galena Street Aspen, CO 81611 (p) 970-429-2758 (f) 970-920-5439 www.aspenpitkin.com From: Patrick Hunter [mailto:hunter@sopris.net] Sent: Tuesday, June 20, 2006 4:13 PM To: Amy Guthrie Subject: Cabin Siding When Dirk and I went to l-IPC they approved "bevel" siding, also known as "clapboard". This is an overlaping board siding, typically tapered at the top. Since the plan is to paint the siding, you said later that we could use "paint grade". To further clarify, could you please email me back answers to these questions? I want to be sure that we are following the guidelines. 1. Does it matter if the siding is smooth or resawn or "wood grained"? 2. Can the siding be other than natural wood? 3. Can the siding be engineered wood (as in hardboard, a recycled product)? 4. Can the siding be a cement based such as Hardie Plank brand? Thank you, Pat Hunter 379-0274 6/23/2006 .* 1 2.I-- A~Â«.44Â·2+4L-U#.45'E.. - -U JAil.44..irr ' t , ,...111 - ..,I.f-~.t~~,1P..:f.,F--,Iyr&9LEf~ft-) 4~~i41}~~,~'~-~2*t T. ;,Â· -44 .4 14â‚¬. , fl.;.1 t.,4,1 - 1 -i--42 54'- ~ 2 .2-: -- 7, . - 7<CHE;~J~~ 701. r 0 01 F 00/ F (@11 \Â» of 7 -'~ Â«24-*. 43,414-*RU 3 - 0 h.4 f %,4.>-- . 1 13â€¢â€¢â€¢Â·.~2r544Â«--1/t~~~ --1 N.. Â·Â·Â·c.iÂ·:Â»i-"1.--4= - ~-c: 4- Â·Â·30 -- --, t---1 - -- -9 --az~ .W.544 3. 474~00 4 4- ...14=4 -46,2-t Â· + i.-' t 609Â£1 afroull ) â„¢ _i: t . -12 h Â· UE 4 6*-/ I Y -- - -<C.N,/.*J - ~" I 6â‚¬~'Â· :' --' I 43 1 66: 1 '11 1. , /- .7,444 :'1Â·.01"I<.4.1-4L: - . :1.... 2 Â¥ Â·*UTk~ k,.i~~' i:.44.L:Â· . | d-- +64 2 1.-43 - ./ -Â·rs....AS,EÂ».1- 46#34Â·.b? //~~ =3rf:-4Â· -t@~~Â· 7 A.'2*2*~ne*:r.# 42' b<BA .. - . :T- ; -3..i.- 7--Â°Â·â€ž33... 2- 2.:tie ~-- ~ ~Â»t~MeÂ«th Â·.2~55ptÂ·fe6.. I - -- I ---, dellilat- /%34/W/:Mitir.--- ..utÂ»Qi;' -4 2 , 9-0 ':f:tA- 1 -5 9. A- :*~**;01~ 'I~9 -*Â·ILed oac-f ,Â£_2242.1- -:*p.- .+ -- 3Â£#9 +Ji~-6** - - *527. z - .-Â»994-2.9,97.222.:NJ E '14 . - .Etyng- I- r .47.~~~ $* - 43 -- I : + Â·- Â·I . I ;.Â·COkÂ·.~~~Â».Â·...5*3.- â‚¬ i .,0 2 -'a6:Â·41:AhÂ·-/-;. bsE- h....3*e- 41 . - & .1//"frt -- 0 ---PIL - - 4 ./ W.- 2- I.P - 4%41 - - 2,&3 .er , 1-2 13961. I - 1 *CA. Â»+ Â· . ' -~ 4 -iâ‚¬AÂ·:Lit 1 - - el- -Cla?*fy- - .1- 2.~4.7= t-42 -2 2.*EN].44 .. RESOLUTION OF THE ASPEN HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION RECOMMENDING APPROVAL OF AN APPLICATION FOR A HISTORIC LANDMARK LOT SPLIT, INCLUDING SUBDIVISION EXEMPTION AND GMQS EXEMPTION, GRANTING AN APPROVAL FOR A VARIANCE FROM THE MINIMUM LOT SIZE FOR A HISTORIC LANDMARK LOT SPLIT, AND GRANTING MAJOR DEVELOMENT (CONCEPTUAL) APPROVAL AND VARIANCES FOR A NEW RESIDENCE FOR THE PROPERTY LOCATED AT 701 W. MAIN STREET, LOTS H and I, LESS THE WEST 2.35 FEET OF LOT H, BLOCK 19, CITY AND TOWNSITE OF ASPEN, COLORADO RESOLUTION NO. 12, SERIES OF 2005 Parcel ID #:2735-124-46-004 WHEREAS, the applicants, Marshall and Susan Olsen, owners, represented by Dirk Danker, architect, have requested a Historic Landmark Lot Split, Major Development (Conceptual), and Variances for the property located at 701 W. Main Street, Lots H and I, less the west 2.35 feet of Lot H, Block 19, City and Townsite of Aspen, Colorado; and WHEREAS, in order to complete a Historic Landmark Lot Split, the applicant shall meet the following requirements of Aspen Municipal Code: Section 26.480.030(A)(2) and (4), Section 26.470.070(C), and Section 26.415.010(D.), which are as follows: 26.480.030(A)(2), Subdivision Exemptions, Lot Split The split of a lot for the purpose of the development of one detached single-family dwelling on a lot formed by a lot split granted subsequent to November 14, 1977, where all of the following conditions are met: a) The land is not located in a subdivision approved by either the Pitkin County Board of County Commissioners or the City Council, or the land is described as a metes and bounds parcel which has not been subdivided after the adoption of subdivision regulations by the City of Aspen on March 24, 1969; and b) No more than two (2) lots are created by the lot split, both lots conform to the requirements of the underlying zone district. Any lot for which development is proposed will mitigate for affordable housing pursuant to Section 26.100.040(A)(1)(c). c) The lot under consideration, or any part thereof, was not previously the subject of a subdivision exemption under the provisions of this chapter or a "lot split" exemption pursuant to Section 26.100.040(C)(1)(a); and d) A subdivision plat which meets the terms of this chapter, and conforms to the requirements of this title, is submitted and recorded in the office of the Pitkin County clerk and recorder after approval, indicating that no further subdivision may be granted for these lots nor will additional units be built without receipt of applicable approvals pursuant to this chapter and growth management allocation pursuant to Chapter 26.100. e) Recordation. The subdivision exemption agreement and plat shall be recorded in the office of the Pitkin County clerk and recorder. Failure on .. the part of the applicant to record the plat within one hundred eighty (180) days following approval by the City Council shall render the plat invalid and reconsideration of the plat by the City Council will be required for a showing of good cause. f) In the case where an existing single-family dwelling occupies a site which is eligible for a lot split, the dwelling need not be demolished prior to application for a lot split. g) Maximum potential buildout for the two (2) parcels created by a lot split shall not exceed three (3) units, which may be composed of a duplex and a single-family home; and 26.480.030(A)(4), Subdivision Exemptions, Historic Landmark Lot Split The split of a lot that is listed on the Aspen Inventory of Historic Landmark Sites and Structures for the development of one new single-family dwelling may receive a subdivision exemption if it meets the following standards: a. The original parcel shall be a minimum of six thousand (6,000) square feet in size and be located in the R-6, R-15, R-151 RMF, or O zone district. b. The total FAR for both residences shall be established by the size of the parcel and the zone district where the property is located. The total FAR for each lot shall be noted on the Subdivision Exemption Plat. In the Office zone district, the following shall apply to the calculation of maximum floor area for lots created through the historic landmark lot split. Note that the total FAR shall not be stated on the Subdivision Exemption Plat because the floor area will be affected by the use established on the property: If all buildings on what was the fathering parcel remain wholly residential in use, the maximum floor area will be as stated in the R-6 zone district. If any portion of a building on a lot created by the historic landmark lot split is in commercial/office use, then the allowed floor area for that lot shall be the floor area allowed for all uses other than residential in the zone district. If the adjacent parcel created by the lot split remains wholly in residential use, then the floor area on that parcel shall be limited to the maximum allowed on a lot of its size for residential use according to the R-6 standards. If there is commercialloffice use on both newly created lots, the maximum floor area for all uses other than residential in the zone district will be applied. c. The proposed development meets all dimensional requirements of the underlying zone district. The variances provided in Section 26.415.120(B)(1)(a),(b), and (c) are only permitted on the parcels that will contains a historic structure. The FAR bonus will be applied to the maximum FAR allowed on the original parcel; and 26.470.070(O, GMOS Exemption, Historic Landmark Lot Split The construction of each new single-family dwelling on a lot created through review and approval of an Historic Landmark Lot Split shall be exempt from the scoring and .. competition procedures. The exemption is to be approved by the Community Development Director, but is not to be deducted from the respective annual development allotments or from the development ceilings; and 26.415.010(D), Historic Landmark Lot Split A Historic Landmark Lot Split is a two step review, requiring a public hearing before HPC and before City Council; and WHEREAS, in order to authorize a variance from the dimensional requirements of Title 26, according to Section 26.314.040, Standards Applicable to Variances, the HPC must make a finding that the following three (3) circumstances exist: 1. The grant of variance will be generally consistent with the purposes, goals, objectives, and policies of the Aspen Area Community Plan and this Title; 2. The grant of variance is the minimum variance that will make possible the reasonable use of the parcel, building or structure; and 3. Literal interpretation and enforcement of the terms and provisions of this Title would deprive the applicant of rights commonly enjoyed by other parcels in the same zone district, and would cause the applicant unnecessary hardship or practical difficulty. In determining whether an applicant's rights would be deprived, tbe board shall consider whether either of the following conditions apply: a. There are special conditions and circumstances which are unique to the parcel, building or structure, which are not applicable to other parcels, structures or buildings in the same zone district and which do not result from the actions of the applicant; or b. Granting the variance will not confer upon the applicant any special privilege denied by the Aspen Area Community Plan and the terms of this Title to other parcels, buildings, or structures, in the same zone district; and WHEREAS, Section 26.415.070 of the Municipal Code states that "no building or structure shall be erected, constructed, enlarged, altered, repaired, relocated or improved involving a designated historic property or district until plans or sufficient information have been submitted to the Community Development Director and approved in accordance with the procedures established for their review;" and WHEREAS, for Conceptual Major Development Review, the HPC must review the application, a staff analysis report and the evidence presented at a hearing to determine the project's conformance with the City of Aspen Historic Preservation Design Guidelines per Section 26.415.070.D.3.b.2 and 3 of the Municipal Code and other applicable Code Sections. The HPC may approve, disapprove, approve with conditions or continue the application to obtain additional information necessary to make a decision to approve or deny; and WHEREAS, for approval of setback variances, the HPC must review the application, a staff analysis report and the evidence presented at a hearing to determine, per Section 26.415.110.C ofthe Municipal Code, that the setback variance: .. a. Is similar to the pattern, features and character of the historic property or district; and/or b. Enhances or mitigates an adverse impact to the historic significance or architectural character of the historic property, an adjoining designated historic property or historic district; and WHEREAS, for approval of a variance from the Residential Design Standards, HPC must review the application, a staff analysis report and the evidence presented at a hearing to determine, per Section 26.410.020.C of the Municipal Code, that the variance would: 1. Provide an appropriate design or pattern of development considering the context in which the development is proposed and the purpose of the particular standard. In evaluating the context as it is used in the criteria, the reviewing board may consider the relationship of the proposed development with adjacent structures, the immediate neighborhood setting, or a broader vicinity as the board feels is necessary to determine if the exception is warranted; or 2. Be clearly necessary for reasons of fairness related to unusual site specific constraints; and WHEREAS, Amy Guthrie, in her staff report dated March 23, 2005, performed an analysis of the application based on the standards, and recommended the application be approved with conditions; and WHEREAS, at a regular meeting held on March 23, 2005, the Historic Preservation Commission considered the application, found the application to meet the standards, and approved the application by a vote o f 6 to 0. THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED: That the HPC recommends Council approval of a Historic Landmark Lot Split 701 W. Main Street, Lots H and I, less the west 2.35 feet of Lot H, Block 19, City and Townsite of Aspen, Colorado, per the drawing labeled Lot Split Plan A, in addition to Demolition, On-site Relocation, and Variances, with the following conditions: 1. A subdivision plat and subdivision exemption agreement shall be reviewed and approved by the Community Development Department and recorded in the office of the Pitkin County Clerk and Recorder within one hundred eighty (180) days of final approval by City Council. Failure to record the plat and subdivision exemption agreement within the specified time limit shall render the plat invalid and reconsideration of the plat by City Council will be required for a showing of good cause. As a minimum, the subdivision plat shall: a. Meet the requirements of Section 26.480 of the Aspen Municipal Code; b. Contain a plat note stating that the lots contained therein shall be prohibited from further subdivision and any development of the lots will comply with the applicable provisions of the Land Use Code in effect at the time o f application; .. c. Contain a plat note stating that all new development on the lots will conform to the dimensional requirements of the Office zone district, except the variances approved by the HPC. d. Contain a plat note stating that the lot that does not contain the historic structure must be developed as a single family residence. e. Contain a plat note stating that the FAR on the two lots created by this lot split shall be based on the use of the buildings. The maximum FAR for each lot may be affected by applicable lot area reductions (i.e., slopes, access easements, etc.). The applicant shall verify with the City Zoning Officer the total allowable FAR on each lot, taking into account any and all applicable lot area reductions. The property shall be subdivided into two parcels, corner Lot A, which is 2,565 square feet in size, and interior Lot B, which is 3,200 square feet in size. 2. Sidewalk, Curb and Gutter - The site is located on Main Street, where pedestrian improvements are an important goal. The applicant must refer to the City Engineering Department for required Sidewalk, Curb, and Gutter requirements appropriate to this site. 3. HPC hereby grants a variance from the minimum required lot size for a Historic Landmark Lot Split, from 6,000 square feet to 5,765 square feet and the minimum lot width from 60 feet to 57.65 feet. In addition, HPC grants a variance from the minimum required lot size for one of the newly created parcels, from 3,000 square feet to 2,565 square feet and the minimum width from 30 feet to 25.65 feet. 4. HPC hereby allows the following setbacks for the proposed new building; 3 feet on the east sideyard, 3 feet on the west sideyard, and 2'6" along the alley. 5. HPC hereby grants variances from the following Residential Design Standards; "Build-to lines, " 6, Secondary Mass," and "Building Elements." 6. The approved design of the new building is as represented in "Option 2," March 23,2005. 7. An application for final review shall be submitted for review and approval by the HPC within one year of March 23, 2005 or the conceptual approval shall be considered null and void per Section 26.415.070.D.3.c.3 ofthe Municipal Code. APPROVED BY THE COMMISSION at its regular meeting on the 23rd day of March, 2005. Approved as to Form: David Hoefer, Assistant City Attorney Approved as to Content: HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION Jeffrey Halferty, Chair ATTEST: Kathy Strickland, Chief Deputy Clerk 0 lie. ' MEMORANDUM TO: Aspen Historic Preservation Commission -JA A- THRU: Joyce Allgaier. Deputy Community Development Director FROM: Amy Guthrie, Historic Preservation Officer RE: 701 W. Main Street- Historic Landmark Lot Split. Major Development (Conceptual), and Variances- Public Hearing DATE: March 23,2005 SUMMARY: The subject property is listed on the Aspei-1 Inventory of Historic Landmark Sites and Structures and contains two structures. a cabin and an outbuilding. Neither building exists on the 1904 Sanborne map. The year of construction for the cabin is 1935 according to the Assessor's office. This project has been discussed over the course of several meetings. HPC has granted approval for the demolition of the alley structure. and approval to move the cabin towards the northeast corner of the site. HPC has recommended that City Council approve a Historic Landmark Lot Split which creates a western lot of 2,765 square feet, and an eastern lot of 3,000 square feet. th Final review of the Lot Split is pending before Council on March 28 . Ata public hearing on February 9% the owner requested feedback on the idea of adjusting the location of the new lot line, which is part of tonight's evaluation. The new plan is to create a western lot of 2 565 square feet and an eastern lot of 3,200 square feet. As was the case with HPC's initial recommendation on the lot split. in order to pursue this redevelopment a variance from the minimum lot size for a Historic Landmark Lot Split is needed, because 701 W. Main Street is a non-conforming parcel. The second element of tonight's review is Conceptual approval of a new detached building behind the cabin. Setback variances are needed, along with some variances from the "Residential Design Standards." This project does not include an FAR bonus. Based on the previous board discussions. Staff recommends that the adjustment to the Historic Landmark Lot Split be supported. including the variances to the minimum lot size required for this subdivision. The review criteria are met and the Lot Split is a good tool for removing development pressure from a small building. Staff recommends that the applicant restudy the roof form and north facing decks on the new structure in order to gain Conceptual approval. APPLICANT: Marshall and Susan Olsen, owners, represented by Dirk Danker, architect. PARCEL ID: 2735-124-46-004. 1 .. ADDRESS: 701 W. Main Street, Lots H and 1. less the west 2.35 feet of Lot It Block 19, City and Townsite of Aspen, Colorado. ZONING: O, Office. HISTORIC LANDMARK LOT SPLIT In order to complete a Historic Landmark Lot Split. the applicant shall meet the following requirements of Aspen Land Use Code: Section 26.480.030(A)(2) and (4). Section 26.470.070(0. and Section 26.415.010(D.) 26.480.030(A)(2), SURD-sION EXEMPTIONS, LOT SPLIT The split o f a lot for the purpose o f the development of one detached single-family dwelling on a lot formed by a lot split granted subsequent to November 14,1977, where all of the following conditions are met: a) The land is not located in a subdivision approved by either the Pitkin County Board of county Commissioners or the City Council, or the land is described as a metes and bounds parcel which has not been subdivided after the adoption of subdivision regulations by the City of Aspen on March 24, 1969. This restriction shall not apply to properties listed oil the Aspen Inventory of Historic Landmark Sites and Structures; and Staff Finding: The property is part of the original townsite and has not been previously subdivided. Most of the Historic Landmark Lot Splits that HPC reviews occur in neighborhoods where residential development is the only option. Although this property is in the Office Zone district. a condition of approval will be required to make it clear that the development occurring on the vacant parcel at 701 W. Main Street must be a single family residence, unless a future code amendment lifts this restriction. The lot that contains the cabin can be developed as either residential or mixed- ilse. b) No more than two (2) lots are created by the lot split, both lots conform to the requirements of the underlying zone district. Any lot for which development is proposed will mitigate for a#ordable housing pursuant to Section 26.100.040(A)(1)(c). Staff Finding: The property is a non-conforming 5.765 square foot lot as a result of an adverse possession by the adjacent neighbor. This proposal will create one 3.200 square foot lot and one 2.565 square tbot lot. The minimum size required for a Historic Landmark Lot Split is 3,000 square feet so HPC will need to consider granting a variance. With regard to the requirements for affordable housing mitigation, Council has recently adopted new benefits for historic properties. pursuant to Section 26.420 of the Municipal Code. which states that mitigation will not be required for properties created through a historic landmark lot split. 2 .. c) The lot under consideration, or any part thereof, was not previously the subject of a subdivision exemption under the provisions of this chapter or a "lot split" exemption pursuant to Section 26.100.040(C)(1)(a); and Staff Finding: The land has not received a subdivision exemption or lot split exemption. d) A subdivision plat which meets the terms of this chapter, and conforms to the requirements of this title, is submitted and recorded in the office of the Pitkin County clerk and recorder ajter approval, indicating that no further subdivision may be granted for these lots nor will additional units be built without receipt of applicable approvals pursuant to this cliapter and growth management allocation pursuant to Chapter 26.100. Staff Finding: The subdivision plat shall be a condition of approval. It must be reviewed by the Community Development Department for approval and recordation within 180 days of final land use action. e) Recordation. The subdivision exemption agreement and plat shall be recorded iii the office of the Pitkin County clerk and recorder. Failure on the part of the applicant to record the plat within one hundred eighty (180) days .following approval by the City Council shall render the plat invalid and reconsideration of the plat by tile City Council will be required for a showing of good cause. Staff Finding: The subdivision exemption agreement shall be a condition of approval. D In the case where an existing single-family dwelling occupies a site which is eligible for a lot split, the dwelling need not be demolished prior to application for a lot split. Staff Finding: No dwelling will be demolished as part of this lot split. The outbuilding along the alley is proposed to be demolished. It is currently being occupied as a residence illegally. which must be corrected. g) Maximum potential buildout for the two (2) parcels created by a lot split shall not exceed three (3) units, which may be composed of a duplex and a single-family home. Staff Finding: The parcel currently contains a single family home. The proposal will add one new homesite. No more than two units in total can be created as part of this redevelopment based on the size of the lots. 3 .. 26.480.030(A)61), SUBDIVISION EXEMPTIONS, HISTORIC LANDMARK LOT SPLIT The split of a lot that is listed on the Aspen Inventory of Historic Landmark Sites and Structures for the development of one new single-family dwelling may receive a subdivision exemption if it meets the following standards: a. The original parcel shall be a minimum of six thousand (6,000) square feet in size and be located in the R-6, R-15, R-151 RMF, or O zone district. Staff Finding: The subject parcel is 5.765 square feet and is located in the Office Zone District. A variance is being requested in order to meet the minimum lot size stated above. b. The total FAR for both residences shall be established by the size of the parcel and the zone district where the property is located. The total FAR for each lot shall be noted on the Subdivision Exemption Plat. In the Office zone district, the following shall apply to the calculation of maximum floor area for lots created through the historic landmark lot split. Note that the total FAR shall not be stated on the Subdivision Exemption Plat because the floor area will be affected by the use established on the property: If all buildings on what was the fathering parcel remain wholly residential in use, the maximum floor area will be as stated in the R-6 zone district. If any portion of a building on a lot created by the historic landmark lot split is in commercial/office use, then the allowed floor area for that lot shall be the floor area allowed fur all uses other than residential in the zone district. If the adjacent parcel created by the lot split remains wholly in residential use, then the floor area on that parcel shall be limited to the maximum allowed on a lot of its size for residential use according to the It-6 standards. If there is commercial/office use on both newly created lots, the maximum floor area for all uses other than residential in the zone district will be applied. Staff Finding: The maximum floor area for the original parcel, containing a historical landmark in the Office zone, is 3.142 square feet. The applicant intends to develop the lot which contains the cabin as mixed use. therefore the FAR is indicated on the site plan as .75: 1. This note should actually be removed in case a future owner decides to develop the cabin as a residence which would have a different allowable tloor area. As stated above. the new lot must be developed as a residence. however no specific FAR should be indicated in case City codes are amended in the future. e. The proposed development meets all dimensional requirements of the underlying zone district. The variances provided in Section 26.415.120(B)(1)(a),(b), and (c) are only permitted on the parcels that will contain a historic structure. The FAR bonus will be added to the maximum FAR allowed on the original parcel. 4 .. Staff Finding: No variances can be granted for the vacant new lot under the HPC review criteria. VARIANCE FROM THE MINIMUM LOT SIZE REOUIREMENTS FOR A HISTORIC LANDMARK LOT SPLIT The applicant will need several variances related to lot size. The first is a variance from the minimum required size for the fathering parcel, which is 6.000 square feet. Due to the adverse possession. the lot is 5,765 square feet. The second variance is for the width of the fathering parcel, which is to be 60 feet, not 57.65 feet. Finally, a variance is needed related to the size of one of the newly created lots, which are meant to be at least 3,000 square feet each. One of the new lots will conform to the requirement. but the other will be 2,565 square feet and 25.65 feet wide. rather than 30 feet wide. In order to authorize a variance from the dimensional requirements of Iitle 26. the LIPC must make a finding that the following three (3) circumstances exist: 1. The grant of variance will be generally consistent with the purposes, goals, objectives, and policies of the Aspen Area Community Pian and this Title; Staff Finding: The AACP does support of the concept of more dense development and infill, and preservation of a variety of historic resources. 2. The grant of variance is the mininium variance that will make possible the reasonable use of the parcel, building or structure; and Staff Finding: Without the lot split. the "use by right" development options for the site are a single family house. which would entail an addition of approximately 2,400 square feet to the 684 square foot original cabin. or an office/mixed use development that would add some 3 700 square feet. HPC has found in the past the Historic Lot Split has worked well to satisfy their goals and the property owner' s. and it takes away the pressure to create out of scale additions on designated buildings. Because of this, staff finds that a variance will allow for the most reasonable and appropriate development scenario in light of the Citys Historic Preservation standards. 3. Literal interpretation and enforcement of the terms and provisions of this Title would deprive the applicant Of rights commonly enjoyed by other parcels in the same zone district. and would cause the applicant unnecessary hardship or practical difficulty. In determining whether an applicant's rights would be deprived, the board shall consider whether either of the following conditions apply: a. There are special conditions and circumstances which are unique to the parcel, building or structure, which are not applicable to other parcels, structures or buildings in the sanie zone district and which do not result from the actions of the applicant; or 5 .. Staff Finding: As stated above, the property does have an unusual circumstance in that it became non-conforming through a property line dispute. The applicant is working with an existing building which cannot be modified in any significant way. Staff finds that this standard is met. b. Granting the variance will not confer upon the applicant any special privilege denied by the Aspen Area Community Plan and the terms of this Title to other parcels, buildings, or structures, in the same zone district; and Staff Finding: No additional FAR is accrued through the variance. only the right to divide it into two residences. This is a use that is generally allowed for historic properties in the zone district. Staff finds that this review standard is met. MAJOR DEVELOPMENT (CONCEPTUAL) The procedure for a Major Development Review, at the Conceptual level, is as follows. Staff reviews the submittal materials and prepares a report that analyzes tile project's conformance with the design guidelines and other applicable Lanel Use Code Sections. This report is transmitted to the HPC with relevant information on the proposed project and a recommendation to continue, approve, disapprove or approve with conditions and the reasons for the recommendation. The HPC will review the application, the sta# analysis report and the evidence presented at the hearing to determine the project's conformance with the City of Aspen Historic Preservation Design Guidelines. The HPC may approve, disapprove, approve with conditions, or continue the application to obtain additional information necessary to make a decision to approve or deny. Major Development is a two-step process requiring approval by the HPC of a Conceptual Development Plan, and then a Final Development Plan. Approval of a Conceptual Development Plan shall be binding upon HPC in regards to the location and form of the envelope of the structure(s) and/or addition(s) as depicted iii the Conceptual Plan application inchiding its height, scale, massing ami proportions. No changes will be made to this aspect of the proposed development by the HPC as part of their review of the Final Development Plan unless agreed to by the applicant. Staff Response: Recently, the 11PC has been contemplating new tools to analyze the appropriateness of proposals to alter historic structures. The following questions are likely to be the center of future discussions, and may be helpful for HPC to at least reference for this project (note that the questions do not serve as formal decision making criteria at this time): 1. Why is the property significant? 2. What are the key features of the property? 3. What is the character of the context? How sensitive is the context to changes? 4. How would the proposed work affect the property's integrity assessment score? 5. What is the potential for cumulative alterations that may affect the integrity of the property? 6 .. The property is significant as part of a relatively small group of remaining rustic style cottages built in Aspen from just before World War II into the 1960's. There were a number of such buildings constructed on Main Street in particular, most of which were tourist cabins. The historic building on this site is very modest in character. It is a simple rectangular building with one gable roof. There have been some alterations, including the enclosure of a porch at the front of the cabin. The existing asphalt siding may or may not be original. The context is the Main Street Historic District, which is sensitive to change. There are Victorian era buildings all around this site, as well as other pre-war cabins and ski lodges.It appears that Main Street has always had a diverse mix of building sizes and heights, evidenced by the combination of miner's cottages with Victorian mansions. There were 1 9th century commercial buildings like Mesa Store, and churches that have been torn down. The ski lodges obviously introduced larger structures, particularly as one moves closer to the Commercial Core. The proposal before HPC is related to a new structure behind the cabin. No work is specified for the cabin at this time. Design Guideline review Conceptual review focuses on the height, scale, massing and proportions of a proposal. A list of the design guidelines relevant to Conceptual Review is attached as "Exhibit A." Historic Landmark Lot Split is pending before City Council. The applicant must develop the interior lot as residential. but plans mixed use for the corner lot. This is very appropriate for the neighborhood. No addition is being proposed for the designated cabin which is admirable. L[PC has granted approval for its on-site relocation and setback variances. The proposed new building is separated from the cabin by approximately 12 feet. In plan form the footprint is fairly similar. The cabin is 684 square feet and the new unit is 1,260 square feet, plus a one car garage. Staff is somewhat uncomfortable with the difference in height between the two buildings. although the proposal is not dissimilar to what has received Conceptual approval at the Conner Cabins. downtown. The new building is pushed as far back to the alley as possible, and HPC would probably not want to see a lot less space between the structures on the lot. The applicant could potentially make better use of basement space and place the second bedroom there. however the program planned for the second and third floors could not likely be moved down to the ground level and still be efficient. Staff recommends that the design be restudied in order to create some elements which intlect to the height of the historic cabin. Specifically, this might include making the east-west ridge the dominant roof line. so that the roo f slopes down towards the front of the lot. The north and south facing gable ends could become dormer elements. The third level deck seems to emphasize the height of the north fawde and would ideally be eliminated. There is no space to locate it on the rear favade. Staff recommends that consideration be given to installing the hot tub on the second floor deck. even if that space were enlarged slightly. The applicable guidelines are: -7 .. 11.3 Construct a new building to appear similar in scale with the historic buildings on the parcel. u Subdivide larger masses into smaller "modules" that are similar in size to the historic buildings on the original site. 11.4 Design a front elevation to be similar in scale to the historic building. o The primary plane of the front should not appear taller than the historic structure. o The front should include a one-story element. such as a porch. 12.14 Design a new building to appear similar in scale to those seen traditionally in the district during the mining era. u Generally. a new building should be one to two stories in height. The HPC guidelines and the "Residential Design Standards" emphasize the importance of entry porches on Aspen homes. The proposed building has a canopy over the entry. but not a functional porch. This should be restudied. It may necessitate moving the entry to the north fagade given space constraints. 11.2 In a residential context, clearly define the primary entrance to a new building by using a front porch. u The front porch should be "functional.' in that it is used as a means of access to the entry. u A new porch should be similar in size and shape to those seen traditionally. u In some cases. the front door itself may be positioned perpendicular to the street; nonetheless. the entry should still be clearly defined with a walkway and porch that orients to the street. SETBACK VARIANCES 1-he application requests an east sideyard setback of 3' a west sideyard setback of 3 feet, and a rear yard setback of 2 6." The criteria for granting setback variances. per Section 26.415.110.C ofthe Municipal Code are as follows: HPC must make a finding that the setback variance: a. Is similar to the pattern, features and character of the historic property or district; and/or b. Enhances or mitigates an adverse impact to the historic significance or architectural character of the historic property, an adjoining designated historic property or historic district. Staff Finding: LIPC has discussed the minimum front yard setback for the historic cabin at length. The building has a long footprint. leaving relatively little space to construct a new detached building that provides some buffer space around the landmark. For this reason. it is appropriate that the new- building be pushed towards the rear lot line. 8 .. The sideyard setback variances are necessitated by the narrow lot width. The applicant is attempting to keep the width of the new building similar to that of the old cabin. which is appropriate. The variances do not affect adjacent properties to any great degree because they are located on street-facing yards and a sideyard which is internal to this project. RESIDENTIAL DESIGN STANDARDS The project requires variances to the Residential Design Standards related to "build-to lines." "secondary mass. and "building elements." All residential development must comply with the " following review standards or receive a variance based on a finding that: A. The proposed design yields greater compliance with the goals of the Aspen area Community Plan (AACP), or. B. The proposed design more effectively addresses the issue or problem a given standard or provision responds to: or, C. The proposed design is clearly necessary for reasons of fairness related to unusual site specific constraints. Standard: BUILD TO LINES. On parcels or lots of less than 15,000 square feet, at least 60% of the front figade shall be within 5 feet of the minimum front yard setback line. On corner sites. at least 60% of both street facades of the building shall be within 5 feet of the mimmum setback lines. Porches may be used meet the 60% standard. Standard: SECONDARY MASS. The intent o f the building form standards is to respect the scale of Aspen's historical homes by creating new homes which are more similar iii their massing, by promoting the development of accessory units off of the city alleys, and by preserving solar access. 1. All new structures shall locate at least ten (10) percent of their total square footage above grade in a mass which is completely detached from the principal building. or linked to it by a subordinate connecting element. Accessory buildings such as garages. sheds, and accessory dwelling units are appropriate uses for the secondary mass. A subordinate linking element for the purposes of secondary mass shall be defined as an element not less than six (6) feet in width and ten (10) feet in length with a plate height of not more than nine (9) feet. Standard: BUILDING ELEMENTS. Whe intent of the following building elements standards is to ensure that each residential building has street-facing architectural details and elements which provide human scale to the facade. enhance the walking experience, and reinforce local building traditions. 1. Street oriented entrance and principal window. All single-family homes, townhouses, and duplexes shall have a street-oriented entrance and a street facing principal window. In the case of 9 .. townhouses and accessory units facing courtyards or gardens, entries and principal windows should face those features. On corner lots, entries and principal windows should face whichever street has a greater block length. Multiple unit residential buildings shall have at least one street oriented entrance for every four (4) units, and front units must have a street-facing principal window. This standard shall be satisfied if all of the following conditions are met: a. The entry door shall face the street and be no more than ten feet (10'0") back from the frontmost wall ofthe building. Entry doors shall not be taller than eight feet. b. A covered entry porch of fifty (50) or more square feet, with a minimum depth of six feet (6'). shall be part of the front facade. Entry porches and canopies shall not be more than one story in height. c. A street-facing principal window requires that a significant window or group of windows face street. 2. First story element. All residential buildings shall have a first-story street-facing element the width of which comprises at least twenty (20) percent of the building's overall width and the depth of which is at least six (6) feet from the wall the first-story element is projecting from. Assuming that the first story element includes interior living space. the height of the first story element shall not exceed ten ( 10) feet. as measured to the plate height. A first-story element illay be a porch or living space. Accessible space (whether it is a deck, porch, or enclosed area) shall not be allowed over the first story element. however, accessible space over the remaining first story elements on the front favade shall not be precluded. Response: This is an alley house that cannot meet the "build-to line requirement." The building in itself is a "secondary mass' on the site, therefore staff finds that it is unnecessary to attempt to break it into two forms to meet the standard. It has a small footprint already. The architect has cliosen to orient the entry to the side street. rather than to Main Street. This allows some privacy from the commercial activity at the front of the lot. and is in keeping with the side door that exists into the historic cabin. Given the discussion above, it may be advisable to move the door to the north fagade to meet HPC design guidelines. Staff finds that it is appropriate to grant the necessary waivers from the "Residential Design Standards." DECISION MAKING OPTIONS: The HPC may: â€¢ approve the application, â€¢ approve the application with conditions, â€¢ disapprove the application, or â€¢ continue the application to a date certain to obtain additional information necessary to make a decision to approve or deny. 10 .. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that HPC grant the necessary variances for the Historic Landmark Lot Split and recommend Council approval for tile subdivision exemption. Staff is iii favor of the setback variances and "Residential Design Standards' that have beeii requested for this project. but restudy of the roof form, north facing decks and entry roof into the new residence are needed. The applicant may bring this information to show HPC' at the hearing. Reconiinended conditions of approval for the lot split remain as they were from the last recommendation. The oiily difference is the change in lot size. Exhibits: A. Relevant Design Guidelines B. Application U f~-1 6 0 2/ lf>~ ble leat)L UU i L 'A 22 1 2/9/0/ , Ill Lf~L + l O,Vt,%24 6- 0~7 7 vT JÂ» lA (J ~g Â©,0,1/1 ~- 404/ f aÂ« 11 .. "Exhibit B: Relevant Design Guidelines for 701 W. Main Street Major Development (Conceptual), Historic Landmark Lot Split, and Variances" 11.1 Orient the primary entrance of a new building to the street. 3 The building should be arranged parallel to the lot lines, maintaining the traditional grid pattern of the site. 11.2 In a residential context, clearly define the primary entrance to a new building by using a front porch. u The front porch should be "functional." in that it is used as a means of access to the entry. u A new porch should be similar in size and shape to those seen traditionally. o In sonic cases, the front door itself may be positioned perpendicular to the street: nonetheless. the entry should still be clearly defined with a walkway and porch that orients to the street. 11.3 Construct a new building to appear similar in scale with the historic buildings on the parcel. o Subdivide larger masses into smaller "modules" that are similar in size to the historic buildings on the original site. 11.4 Design a front elevation to be similar in scale to the historic building. u The primary plane of the front should not appear taller than the historic structure. u The front should include a one-story element, such as a porch. 11.5 Use building forms that are similar to those of the historic property. u They should not overwhelm the original iii scale. 11.6 Use roof forms that are similar to those seen traditionally in the block. 1 Sloping roofs such as gable and hip roofs are appropriate for primary roof forms. u Flat roofs should be used only iii areas where it is appropriate to the context. u On a residential structure. eave depths should be similar to those seen traditionally in the context. u Exotic building and roof forms that would detract from the visual continuity of the street are discouraged. These include geodesic domes and A-frames. 12.1 Respect historic settlement patterns. u Site a new building iii a way similar to historic buildings in the area. This includes consideration of building setbacks, entry orientation and open space. 12.6 Minimize the use of curb cuts along the street. o Provide auto access along an alley when feasible. i New curb cuts are not permitted. u Whenever possible. remove an existing curb cut. 12.8 Provide a front yard that is similar in depth to its neighbors. See the guidelines chapter: Lot and Streetscape Features. 12.9 Orient a new building in a manner that is similar to the orientation of buildings during the mining era, with the primary entrance facing the street. u The building should be oriented parallel to the lot lines maintaining the traditional grid pattern of the block. o A structure should appear to have one primary entrance that faces the street. The entrance to the structure should be at an appropriate residential scale and visible from the street. 12.10 When constructing a new building, locate it to fit within the range of yard dimensions seen in the block. u These include front yard . side yard and rear yard setbacks. 12 .. a In some areas. setbacks vary, but generally fall within an established range. A greater variety iii setbacks is inappropriate in this context. u Consider locating within the average range of setbacks along the block. 12.11 Keep the front setback of a new structure in line with the range of setbacks on the block seen historically during the mining era. 12.12 Maintain similar side yard setbacks of a new structure or an addition to those seen traditionally in the block during the mining era. 12.13 Locate a new secondary structure in a manner that is similar to those seen historically in the district. u Place it along the alley edge. 12.14 Design a new building to appear similar in scale to those seen traditionally in the district during the mining era. i Generally. a new building should be one to two stories in height. 12.15 On larger structures, subdivide larger masses into smaller "modules" that are similar in size to single family residences or Victorian era commercial buildings seen traditionally on Main Street. u Other, subordinate modules may be attached to the primary building form. i Each identifiable mass should have its own entrance. 13 I I ' I 09 4 h' inT Â«j ff GARAGE BDRM/STUDY 1~'-5" x 10'-2" 12'-0" x 10'-2" 02 M -2 --1-- U ) A-- 321> F â€¢ C )$ = 11 LI ------- ~ dn / N ENTRY Â© 4 5'-6" x 7'-0" 1 1 ~~ BATH 0 UP 8'~. x 5'-0" Fi 11 1 st FLOOR PLAN ~ ALLOWABLE FAR MIXED TOTAL AREA: 372 sf.ft. USE LOT 2,565 x .75 Condo Building = 1,260 sq.ft. 204 sf.ft. Garage Cabin = 684 sq.ft 372 sf.ft. Basement = 1,923.75 sq.ft. TOTAL AREA = 1,944 sq.ft. 1 1 1 1 1 NagleHartray[)ankerl<agan'VIcKafenney Condominium Plans 701 West Main Street ARCHITECTS. LTD. Aspen, Colorado 30 West Monroe Stmet Chic:ago, Illinois 60603 26 FERUARY 2005 T. 312.425.1000 F. 3 IZ425. IOOI SCALE. 1/4" = 1'-0 C hoor) ' UooL, KITCHEN 10'-2" x 9'-7 -- - --------[-73?1?13---41219-- ----- - dn UP 61_3 44 V - li L-127*4444%444414%*ENIâ‚¬4444ff~333 2 kimp;33>93133..Cl] 2nd FLOOR PLAN 444 sq.ft. 18.5 sq.ft. optional bay -- 1 1 1 1 1 NagleHartray[)ankerKaganMcKafenney Condominium Plans 701 West Main Street ARO-lITECTS, LTD, Aspen, Colorado 30 West Monroe Street OlicagO, ||linois 60603 26 FERUARY 2005 T. 3 1 1425. I 000 SCALE: 1/4" = 1'-0 F. 312425.1001 1-1--Ii.i 1 1 / 1 1/ 1 CL?SET / / - 5'-0" 4 15'4" 1 / /\ 1' U. 1 1 MBR _ 7 0 I I 1 A.. I \ 1 / 1 O.0 1 ' 1 0 1 \\ 1 // _ 1 DECK \1/ 1 \1/ 1 f f 1 0-1 /1\ ./1\\ 1 T-0' x 6'-10" /1\ 7 //IN \ \ \ 1 , . / \ 1 \ MBR / \ 1 / __J' 11'-6" k 15'-4" t--------- /1 1 \\ / 1 1 \ / 1 1 1\ 1 11 1 0 \ / 1 , 1 , \ i-1 I 3nd FLOOR PLAN 444 sq.ft. 1 1 1 1 1 NagleHartray[)ankerl<agar,Mel<ayPenney Condominium Plans 701 West Main Street ARCHRECTS, LTD. Aspen, Colorado 30 West Monroe Street Chicago, Illinois 60603 26 FERUARY 2005 T. 312.425.1000 SCALE. 1/4" = 1'-0" E 3 I 2.425. I 00 I b / ... 1 1 , EXISTING TREE-j'~ ~ LOT SPLIT LINE :s < 03 / 1 -4/ cul j C Â°le 1 1 1 \{ 4~ 4 28 I .4 ... 4 1 bt / 0 1 01 44 f F--3 J BORMI STUCY ---<: f- -fs f- -- /1CP /0-1 4 17Â·{r x 10-2Â· , 4/\- 2'V 1-n_,OU CD 1 1 CD 1 k PROPOSED 0 4-27 1 '7 0- RELOCATED ~cy 1.1 i .5 k EXIS+ING - CO 1 4 28 04 â€¢~ | STRUCTURE ~, bo'-0" Â° ~ 4 1 -Pe 11[IRCH ' i IiI /111 92h 1111.111 1 lilli . Â»0447 1 h 9124\ -Ill ..I ./- -I'll.- - Â«220â‚¬* 4 04 ' Â»fÂ»le 3-377,30 TÂ«nE 13-41 ------------0--1,1/-lufar f - - ~ 'bo ) 1 f ( .11 f r r o 00 92=o .[PActir ,-, %,6,> 04 L L 28 40 5 0 4 v ,=:pc-/ 1- Â»titifUL e eu / 2 - .%. --39 -,1, -4 â‚¬-23 6 LA (527 a rE&0 Â«43 ------- DITCH 9701 4 00 29 ----- 09.4-7 --- 44 Eck-1 k le O -- J) A-39 -d= 9 :.112. 319 /8 01 4 8 16 t~ 4494 4 :,44 // 6th Street ~ 9/22 9-92 nn atekkg %â€ž4221Â« -/--Â«jlÂ« 3 1-Â»ak 9=4 49,2 -u C~ 2 64-<~Â£ ulf %@FF fA-D~~ 2 1 \NU w fi rl rk 'A, \ V \uum' 91/ // ___-v]~44 2 16 u - YMNAURN 1 f -' v jt,KNNFÂ« 1,~1 11*4J 43#/ A kNW'//r// A Fly/UL * Â«94*trf y -1/hy \. fbEN n 44*Â«304 4:antÂ¥.04 1 F V. 49Â§*PM,1.f , /1 ENIâ„¢4- V 7,1/ , \493Â«,10/ 41.441*74 /0/ 44:.21*:ff ' 441Efi 1%7 1 1 0-j .,4 1 - e f 199Wy, P 3 *~44,0 Â«trr- - - -- hcu 1212%11.,50*E 5,Af 1 I " l'14 .Ikh@[Ii-i iÂ·q4ll il Iii H ' ""J '+T'fli THS< : 1111111111 7~1:2i C::-- - - - ------,--'....... '7 r 1- .IF:*Â· 80 0 Elli -3 ~ l~ || ~ AliRSTIKKE - - F el Â£ 1//11 ALLEY EAST - 6th STREET ELEVATION MAIN STREET SCALE: 1/8" = 1'-0" 1 1 1 1 1 NagleHartray[)ankerl<aganMcKayPenney 6th Street Condominium & Cabin Elevations 70 1 West Main Street ARCH[TECTS, LTD. 30 West Monroe Street Option 1 (Preferred Elevation) Aspen, Colorado Chicago, Illinois 60603 T. 3 I 2.425.1000 23 MARCH 2005 F. 312.425.1001 0 0 0 . - C=23 <249 CD 8 go P 0 6 0 cP 0 0 Cl 4 0.6 0 0 0 0 % C==0 -,<523 0 :. 0=16029-00 , C.6. 0 O 0 0.8 /00 0 0 0 00 u 1 \ P / \ 0 0127 Et=~ 4 . 0 0 0 0 0 cp 402-49) Bc=El stÂ©--r' ~ 1.I Col 9 \ % 2./ rce.1 05:L 6 1 QO 0 Ahâ‚¬y~Â·-1 0 1 \Kp o O / 1*Â©4 EDÂ® [El Â® -===EEEZE==U|_ ~ cp*) n e-- 0 l.Â»3 0 6--f_~ / 01 0 0 n : dEf . g ...21 /% =po iZES b-ZIAL- 0 0 cbs--j ..~=1-rL.1 Â«-11 4 U K 97 dIV 0 2* - Jr/- 11 P ,1 11- 1 44> V g. C= 0 THIRD FLOOR 4,_ & \L-21_All] O 00 0 2 vt 1-Ll.1-07 D 00(<-1- -El,-A 9594 L n, 41/ 0 d-EL Â° 4/t-Â¢ZÂ»en--3 lute 4 41% LYFâ‚¬4 1.- 1 In< inf' Ah ~ SECOND FLOOR El//15/8 dim Â«_ 39 --4 - 1- 0 R 0 FIRST FLOOR rud NORTH - MAIN STREET ELEVATION NORTH CONDOMINIUM ELEVATION r-J SCALE: 1/8" = 1'-0" 1 1 1 1 1 NagleHartrayDankerl<aganMcKayPenney Main Street Condominium & Cabin Elevations 70 1 West Main Street ARCH[TECTS, LTD. 30 West Monroe St,Â·eet Option 1 (Preferred Elevation) Aspen, Colorado Chicago, Illinois 60603 T. 31 2425.1000 23 MARCH 2005 F. 312.425.1001 8. 0 djo .. I 1 0 .1 3.6 1 \ EXISTING mEE-j' LOT SPLIT LINE n 9X Â«-41 (/1 -4- . ,-1- O l 6 2 /Kf f - 1 >e f .- 0 64 ---4----1, 'b 3 /gual 1 02 jes 4 L . 4 [~1 - -F- r,1, Al - f 41 j /1-Jy I- 1 41 4 C E-/ 04 1 iIi /1 4- \ ,Â»F f Â«--30 1--- i-$-K< -M 0 0 | BORM / SAICY l------------1 + 14/ % . ~ VA-y-2 ~ - C 79 4 i a: 93)2.091 b ~- N 17-01 10-2 \91 L 1 r , 4 111 LOCA*ION 1Â«Af PRCPOSED E 1 1 1 1.111 1 I rriETTT 1 7 0- RELOCATED ve Â·- rr'70' 1 1 4111 .8 , lt-r= 1 1 I Â»â„¢- /\ i, 1njug I k EXISTING >-===_L-Ll.ILLL - ILl==215' 4.-M STRUCTURE 1 1 /101 -9- 1 .1 4 . 110'-G r \J\,kgh) 1 (7 31 926 . 111 1 !1 11 - \.jer ,/ ..-.- - 77 1 MN'k . -24 ~ 14 2 ~ 23 al Y og O) 2 op ji 4__r = 3Â»1/ 1 0 FrA 4% 34% 10 'ce -1 9-2.5 c - 28.4 04 L - 9- 000(629-~~Zx30- - DITCH 44\-3 109 ---------------- 4/01.90 ---- dve' O : exb - u 01 4 8 16 Jt~ Â« v--3-W V. /9, 1 /\ -<-1 174-/ U 0 / 6th Street ~0 3 Â«41/2 90 n fl nn 11*W -<am'fisTY - U-3-1, Â«~~-Â«j--uu 4 *14*- \ 1.1231>f A 1 6Â«0 1/ /Laâ€¢ 7 n Ll--f Dâ‚¬IP?t ,-rn j I 43/, 99*or.-f- ha j (r 11 9'M 0 ~93kt>' L -- 1- 1\99 9 i~ uny,4 1 490-Ki~ Ai~*PEt O L] P+- 1/\*W /4'/ \4\A ' 1/ the - 4%34%41Â«2 4'*ADDhjk 1/9 ~ % 'ID.Â»0 / -XÂ»*Â¥01(//1/1 13NIF=t< 4*. 1*24: #L -L .UM/-41/ Tri TE -2 *Â°*~-.EF-'-1%-/ 1,44]05 0 1\ 1 3 44714$, 762 - 11-L*U~FdÂ· 1-3--chammaiw,Z I;III '-HII-titildlll.ll tl 'Illl#ll 1 111 11 H' 4-1-tr -1 1 11 ~ 44* -u-1-1-1 1 3-z - , EFF E E -3 1 1 Y F.Â»35 1 1 1 / 1 1 1 1 ALLEY EAST - 6th STREET ELEVATION MAIN STREET SCALE: 1/8" = 1'-0" 1 1 1 1 1 NagleHartrÂ·ayDankerKaganMcKayPenney 6th Street Condominium & Cabin Elevations 70 1 West Main Street ARCHITECTS, LTD. 30 West Monroe Street Chicago, Illinois 60603 Option 2 Aspen, Colorado T. 312.425.1000 23 MARCH 2005 F. 3 l 2.425. IOOI - HOND .... ay 13Â° C 980 8 22Â£5f 0 1 093.J 0 0 6 % <22â‚¬23 I=tr- 0-2 6 n 0Â° O 0 'tr...3 2 j 0 0 // ET- U G 0 -Cal Q 6--1 - ky 33 0 go <2 0 iD I .3.3 ..3< O 0 4/)<3 1/~ - M k 1 Â«907Â»1- a r 11 11 le-Â«91 11 /111'lili \%~ /35 i 0 THIRD FLOOR %2 A t.1 -& "50(9 0 - A 1 1 11 1 0 ~Â¤na U '21-*L o ..31%%1*49-3 15549% 20 4 fi 666 -486==_ ~ SECOND FLOOR 32Â« _ 210 0 r-- - I Q i 1 11-7-1-- 0 FIRST FLOOR r-~ r-~ - NORTH - MAIN STREET ELEVATION NCRTH ELEVATION SCALE: 1/8" = 1'-0" lilli / NagleHartrayDankerKaganMcKayPenney Main Street Condominium & Cabin Elevations 70 1 West Main Street ARCHn ECTS, LTD. 30 West Monroe Street Chicago, Illinois 60603 Option 2 Aspen, Colorado T. 312.425.1000 23 MARCH 2005 F. 312.425.1001 .... 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 / 1 1 CL@SET 1 1/ i | 5-e 1 15'-4" 1 / 1 MBR i 007-27-1 --T-----*----- -------- 1 /1\ 1 /1\ 1 // 1 / \ d. / 1 1 1 1 1 / \ *R 1 / \ 1 ----------- 4 11'-6"4(14'-8" 1 1 -.-2 i i'\ / 1 1 \ // 1 1 1 \\ \ L.--____ ___ __ __-_-- -__ ________.--__ _____ ___ _________ _J jnd-FLOOR PLAN 432 sq.ft. CT-F- r 1 (--7 GARAGE \ i BDRM/STU Y | | 18'-5' 1101-r ~ 12'-0" x 10'-2" 9-691-- LAX - 1 Of 1 00 .- KITCHEN -------- I 10'-2" x 9'-7 n -'0 03 - 1 BATH ---- 81 .x 51-011 dn 1 .2 1 L= S i lili' 111 lilli 1 UP ' ' 1* Re 1 / ALLOWABLE 1 1st FLOOR PLAN f / 4 FAR MIXED TOTAL AREA: 372 sf.ft. USE LOT Condo Building = 1,236 sq.ft. 204 sf.ft. Garage 2,565 x .75 Cabin = 684 sq.ft 372 sf.ft. Basement = 1,923.75 sq.ft. TOTAL AREA = 1,920 sq.ft. 576 sf.ft. Building Footprint 2nd FLOOR PLAN 432 sq.ft. NagleHartrayDankeri<aganMcKayPenney Condominium Floor Plans 70 1 West Main Street ARCHITECTS, LTD. 30 West Monroe Street Option 1 Aspen, Colorado Chicago, Illinois 60603 T. 3 1 2425. I 000 23 MARCH 2005 F. 312.425.1001 Main Street 0 0 BASIS OF BEARING i f\\\\\\\\ S 75Â°09'11" E 270.02' DITCH --------------------------------____---___-_ 57.65' -- 15-~10 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 11 1 1 | ' 5-7'--7~36" | 1 Â« 32'-0" 1 < 251--11% 11 1 ij i 1 1 11 1 1 1 1 1 0 1 1 Zzi 1 0 1 1 1 1 11 11 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 101 1 1 1 -1 LOT'B' HISTORIC 1 1 0 cn 0 3,200 s.f. LOT 'A' 1* 1 1 1 1 2,565 st 1 1 1 1 1 101 ALLOWABLE ALLOWABLE 191 1 1 0 FAR SINGLE FAR MIXED O 1 FAM I LY LOT USE LOT 11 1 1 ~ | = 1,923.75 sq.ft. = 2,456 sq.ft. 2,565 x .75 ' 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 ! 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 H I I 1 0 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 5 J 1 =1 1 1 0 1 1 P 1 I H I 1 7 1 I m I I 1 1 1 1 1 1 BLOCK 19 1 | City of Aspeb 1 11 1 S 75Â°09'11" E 57.65' N,>,th 15710 1 Public Alley /0 SCALE: 1/8" 4 1'-0 lilli NagleHartrayDankerKaganMcKayPenney 701 WEST MAIN STREET HISTORIC LOT SPLIT PLAN ARCHITECTS, LTD. ASPEN, COLORADO Parcel ID: 2735-124-46-004 30 West Monroe Street 1 Chicago, Illinois 60603 1 MARCH 2005 Drawing 1 of 3 T. 312.425.1000 23 MARCH 2005 Revised F. 312,425.1001 6th Street N 14Â°50'49" E 100.00' Main Street 01 0 BASIS OF BEARING fh\\\\\\\\ S 75Â°09'11" E 270.02' DITCH -------------------------------__---__--____ 57.65' fi--------- _ _ur-u~_ _ Â¢ 1 \ - -9 L EXISTING FENCE j iii TO BE REMOVED .-- 1 9 ill -J 1 / 1 \ 0 \ / 1 \ \ 1 0 9 41 1 11 1 / 1 \ 1 571-71%11\\ Â«Ilt- \ / EXISTINe TREh 1 1 / 1 9 12611 ) i 1Â« 1 1 1 I i %\~ | | 25'--7'%'i ~ 1 321-0 n 1 11 - 1 1 1 \ 1 / \ 1 / \ 1 / r-----r----- 1 _-- 4 1 16.2' 111 / 1 1 1 1 1 1 / 1 1 I i 1 \ 1 1 1 P*TION 1 1 I1n - 94 T BE OCATED 1 1 \ \1 - E-----1-----4- ----- 1 1 1 I l l b r 1 1 1 1 1 --1 1 1 1 0'lliE STOil TIL I 1 1 1 1 1 1 HOUSE I 1 1141 i*iM tz 1 701' 1 1 1 1 I 1-1 - 1 1 11 1 1 111 1 1 1 >Ils ' XI NI 11 1 I i MIDOLE PORTION 1 1 11 1 1 TO 13E REL~CATED 1 1 1 EtÂ»~ 1 1 11 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 j 1 lot I 1 1 1 Il l 101 1 11 1 1 1 1 1 el I i 16 i I lot 11 1 1 1 1 1 1 sout[H POR-fION 1 L--__~___--________--- ----_____-__'---_---------1---i 1 TO BE REL.~ATED l 1 1 | | F- -------- - 1 li ' ~6.2' ' i i 6 1 1 1 1 :1 1 I I 11 1 1 EXISTINe FENCE 1 i E : N -1 TO BE REMOVED ~ ~- EXISTINe RENAE | 1 9 1 2 1 TO BE REMOVED, 1 -1 1 1 r- - 1 EXISTINe TREE \ 1 Mi , TO BE REMOVED i ' ' 1 i ; 14.0' 1 1 1 ; ICIn 1 1 WALK _ ~ BLOCK 19 1 x 1* - 4 2z~.0' Z E I City o(AspeÂ¢ : XISTINB SHED TO BE DEMOLISHED i I 1 / 1 1 1 1 1 2 1 387 _ - -4 1 S 75Â°09'11" E 57.65' N,ir!11 15710 1 Public Alley SCALE 1/8- = 1'-0 01 4 H lilli NagleHartrayDankerKaganMcKayPenney 701 WEST MAIN STREET HISTORIC DEMO & ARCHITECTS, LTD ASPEN, COLORADO RELOCATION PLAN 30 West Monroe Street Parcel ID: 2735-124-46-004 2 Chicago, Illinois 60603 T. 312.425.1000 1 MARCH 2005 Drawing 2 of 3 F. 312.425,1001 23 MARCH 2005 Revised hÂ»Â»Â»32Â»Â»Â»Â»Â»Â»Â»Â»Â»Â»Â»9Â«Â«4000Â»Â»Â»1 DITCH 6th Street L M ,,6*.09. f L S " E 100.00' Main Street <CO] 11\ BASIS OF BEARING ~ S 75Â°09'11" E 270.02' DITCH ---- 57.65' -- 11101 1 1 -1 7 1 L EXISTINe FENCE TO BE REMOVED/'- --,~ 111 '' 9 1 1 1 1 1 1 I I / 1 \ 10 Ill , , Â»1 1 9 1 1 1 i 1 1 (3\' | / EXISTINe TREEn / i 51'- 7% 4 1 C I i ' 32'-0" C) 5 25'-1'Â°40'~ ~~~ 1 , '' ly, 1 1 1 1 1 1 11 \ 1 16.2'. I 1 1 \ /i 1 : 1 1 1 1 1 1 - 1 1 1 -- -SbUTH-PARTION 1 | 1--Â· --- 1 1*BE RELOGATED ~ 1 1 1 1 b 2-1 1I lili 1 1 11 lili 01#E STOil Ill It 1 1 1 111 j 1 HOUSE I 14\1\ 1 1 1 70l' 1 I 1 1 1 1* 1 1 1 12 IN 1 -11 1 IZ 1 >!4 ~ 1 Ill 41 l r 1 MI ~ SKI 1 191 41 11 1 6 1 MilÂ®LE PORTION 1 1 TO ~E RELÂ®ATED 1 2%4\ , k.)1 lill 1 -1 11 1 /4 1 1 1 i,1 1 1 1 1 1 1 lei 1 1 1 1 1 15=)1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 . 11 il 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 O 1 1 Ial 11 1 0 1 1> I - L Im 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 i 1 1 SOUTH FOR-I'ION 1 1 1 TO {BE REL~GATED 1 L---------- WALK 1 1 1 1 1 - --------*il 1 1- 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 111 1 ' L 1 11 H 1 0 1 1 1I 1 1 - - 1 Tri Â«19Â« 1 131 1 1 1 811[~Nul=t 1 2161 1 1 | LD i -\ 1 1 1 111 1 1 1 -1 111 I I ~ F EXISTINe TREE \ 1 E \\4 MINI 1,1 ,' TO BE REMOVED \ 1- 1 1 _L ' BLOÂ« 19 / L - 1 kALK~tu~ --14 1 ' I 1 2, / 1 z I City o(Aspeb )<ISTIN~.~HEE~ . / 1-4 1 1 11 1 1 1 38.7' 1 /1 . 9 'Ch , ---W. I.--- I -UÂ»-4 -1 1 S 75Â°09'11" E 57.65' 01 Mill|1 15710 -1-69 Public Alley SCALE: 1/8" = 1'-0 a , lilli NagleHartrayDankerKaganMcKayPenney 701 WEST MAIN STREET HISTORIC DEMO, RELOCATION & ~ ARCHITECTS. LTD. ASPEN, COLORADO NEW CONDOMINIUM PLAN 30 West Monroe Street Parcel ID: 2735-124-46-004 Chicago, Illinois 60603 T. 312.425.1000 1 MARCH 2005 Drawing 3 of 3 F. 312.425.1001 23 MARCH 2005 Revised to>Â»Â»Â»2<XÂ«Â»Â»Â»94Â»Â»Â»00000Â»Â»1Â»40Â»2\11 DITCH 6th Street L M ..617.09017 L S Â°50'49" E 100.00' 01. 0 1 1 -0 L 00 1 8 -11,/1 - 1 i EXISTING TREE -/ \0. r. LOT SPLIT LINE n r -40 châ€¢ 0. --- ---__-_- -_1-- r o -I '-9.- /Â«Â«- r.r'~.- . 31 28 1 01/ 7 0 4/'lli-/ be, iff - : ~ 60'-,- - -i V U~: 0 1 0- 1 1 , 1~ L:69 I. 1 28 f 1 f 1 , I 1 12=9 BON /STUCY-- - c Â·-/ |' ' f V e 1 4.Ol 1 i i 0-Â»mit ni 12-0Â· x 12-2 , -~,- i- -Â· in-u ~ ~ f 1 9198 ca 3 U 1 1 i PRCPOSED A L :s ~5/ fpÂ· r 1 J L__ -=90' \04 1 ;, LOCATION i Â«J*â‚¬3.r' 1 . I Â° 131 / 1 1 0/Â«n /40 1 7 0- prLOCATED 1 X StiNG 02 1 (. \ C 4 1 STRUCTURE J- 020 1 , DO'-011 /1, p f K 0 3 0 40 < ~lll'll 11 ~ 11111111111~11111 1 -- LOY,VaTJ %]C1 'IhÂ· ~ 2 1 F \Jxt~.2 --~-- 3:-7 -.- - - I. 1 1 11 1 1. 1 -- 6 1 )6-, x -i - 2Ld 1 K a -14 cy, el b . .1 ry-~<.he 12â‚¬ :08 0~ 11//7 Â»946041/ f 06 ya )1 g W\ 0 I â‚¬ l.4450 h 't:21-~ h f 2 41 6 1 555 :4 <~ -7-Â»r-j Vi i - Â« - 1 i# 28. 0 0 0 3 2 -9~6 00 CP 69-43 ' 6-4 u-79 %9 EfÂ» 00 1,5 \49 91 -- - DITCH -IA -=--- - 1-Ill-1-1 --- -1 - - 1-6 _la R 1 01 4 8 16 J/$ v- W [46 4 0 Â»9 344 6th Street - 1-2 0 93 O 13/.4-1 / elf â‚¬11<El 3 Y. r_- O 9 m F-1 1 1 Â«~hast<10 6:53 *~r=aE- 1 k/ 29/V /tart , 3 -1/ i.&2,., L 2 r--32' 4 --L-,- L ,i~ j _, 0 - 442 -1.Er - 1-0 . f. 1 \ #1 /1 0 9 t.uy\' /11/ b ' /Â·MP , ILFIA , 4'PUL,1/ n.ff'- %3%220 r/.Â« 1 6=bu- * =*-2 p. TR,Â¥0 F \ 4 \ - 1 2 91Â«10 1 4 3 , 1-1 1 Â«24 9 < 7(1~ ''t'ill#~-1,07*p 1 >2 14380, U'J *41*F - tr==-2 -2-30~1-1---til__1 ~ 11-~tr= l~.,1- y 1 . Â»2Â«\,4-le=<a/, i i: /1/, -Â»14 1 1 %3~ ~Â«tsÂ«=- -FiM#111111utll'I 111 1 1 '.1 11'll 1 1111[1 \-1 - ! 41 --f ' 1 1 ---, Nl rthZ12~UM,V. i <9 --- -rnll- 1- \-9 2126% -4 1- 2 -fa .- 1 91 Ill 1 .I RSII[{MR ALLEY EAST - 6th STREET ELEVATION MAIN STREET SCALE: 1/8" = 1'-n" Nagle~artrayDankerKaganMcKayPenney 6th Street Condominium & Cabin Elevations 70 1 West Main Street ARCHrTECTS. LTD. 30 West Monroe Street ~ption 2_L Aspen, Colorado Chicago, Illinois 60603 T. 312.425.1000 23 MARCH 2005 F. 312.425.1001 FfeffERÂ«) 438-10 4 leeils u!ev\I .... 1 9,0# /r (j 2=16> <24 949/ Ck>O k 0%6 0 0 0 Cp = 00 62 eÂ° 00 6 0 00 C tÂ» 0 008 10 0 0 -2Ch ce~Â·-] 2 0 C 00 Wdly .0 0 0 dtri~&7 /4 0 0 00 0 ~#4 0 L , .3 =22 0 0 THIRD FLOOR 00 0 477 1 Air f 0 4-214 ur 1,1 1 ~ SECOND FLOOR 1 El Â® 121 2 5 - 9-1 1 ii =- 0 FIRST FLOOR I NORTH - MAIN STREET ELEVATION NC RTH ELEVATION SCALE: 1/8" = 1'-0" NagleHartray[Dankeri<aganM(KayPenney Main Street Condominium & Cabin Elevations 70 1 West Main Street ARCHITECTS, LTD. 30 West Monroe Street Chicago, Illinois 60603 Option 2 Aspen, Colorado T. 312.425.1000 23 MARCH 2005 F. 312.425.1001 0 SOO . r-mmIT--1 11- 1 ATTACHMENT 7 60-W AFFIDAVIT OF PUBLIC NOTICE REQUIRED BY SECTION 26.304.060 (E), ASPEN LAND USE CODE ADDRESS OF PROPERTY: 9 w 01/1~ i 513- , Aspen, CO SCHEDULED PUBLIC HEARING DATE: 1 LS>V , 6.70 , 20(6 STATE OF COLORADO ) County of Pitkin ) A I Vvlat/i Uff (23124 (name, please print) being or representing an Applicant to the City of Aspen, Colorado, hereby personally certify that I have complied with the public notice requirements of Section 26.304,060 (E) of the Aspen Land Use Code in the following manner 6/Publication of notice: By the publication in the legal notice section of an official paper or a paper of general circulation in the City of Aspen at least fifteen (15) days prior to the public hearing. A copy Ofthe publication is anached hereto. & Posting of notice: By posting of notice, which form was obtained from the Community Development Department, which was made of suitable, waterproof materials, which was not less than twenty-two (22) inches wide and twenty-six (26) inches high, and which was composed of letters not less than one inch in height. Said notice was posted at least fifteen (15) days prior to the public hearing and was continuously visible from the day of , 200 , to and including the date and time ofthe public hearing. A photograph of the posted notice (sign) is attached hereto. 6/44ailing of notice. -By the mailing of a notice obtained from the Community Development Department, which contains the information described in Section 26.304.060(E)(2) of the Aspen Land Use Code. At least fifteen (15) days prior to the public hearing, notice was hand delivered or mailed by first class postage prepaid U. S. mail to any federal agency, state, county, municipal government, school, service district or other governmental or quasi-governmental agency that owns property within three hundred (300) feet ofthe property subject to the development application. The names and addresses ofproperty owners shall be those on the current tax records of Pitkin County as they appeared no more than sixty (60) days prior to the date of the public hearing. A copy of the owners and governmental agencies so noticed is attached hereto. (continued on next page) . i, - .. Rezoning or text amendment. Whenever the official zoning district map is in any way to be changed or amended incidental to or as part of a general revision of this Title, or whenever the text of this Title is to be amended, whether such revision be made by repeal ofthis Title and enactment of a new land use regulation, or otherwise, the requirement of an accurate survey map or other sufficient legal description of, and the notice to and listing of names and addresses of owners of real property in the area of the proposed change shall be waived. However, the proposed zoning map has be,en available for public inspection in the planning agency during all busin0Â«ours for fifteen (15) days prior to the public hearing on su~ amendments~- t-Ii 01 Â»ignaturk The foregoing "Affidavit of Notice" was acknowledged before me this p Akday of F,-,b, ,1 <,,-Ul , 2001 by --7-6 c u sa- 03 4.12Â£ -21- WITNESS MY HAND AND OFFICIAL SEAL My commission expires: 1 ~1~Cpy r <-3 ajog 3 2_ /71Â»ox Notary Public Ullu ATTACHMENTS: %4%2100 Atv Cominission Expires f COPY OF THE PUBLICATION PHOTOGRAPH OF THE POSTED NOTICE (SIGN) LIST OF THE OWNERS AND GOVERNMENTAL AGENCIES NOTICED BY MAIL .. IAMLIN CONNIE E HANLE JEFFREY T HAYES MARY FAMILY PTNSP LTD 19 W MAIN ST #207 126 S 7TH ST PO BOX 497 PEN, CO 81611 ASPEN, CO 81611 ASPEN, CO 81612 HISPATEL CORP IERRICK DARBY HOOK BRADLEY K & PAMELA D C/O FINSER CORP B KEON 24 W HOPKINS ST 782C NORTH KALAHEO 550 BILTMORE WY ,SPEN, CO 80611 KAILUA, HI 96734 CORAL GABLES, FL 33134 IUNTINGTON TRUST CO NA TRUSTEE IGLEHART JIM IGLEHART JIM 70 COATES REID & WALDRON 610 W HALLAM ST 617 W MAIN ST 20 E HYMAN AVE ASPEN, CO 81611 ASPEN, CO 81611 ,SPEN, CO 81611 ENKINS JULIE N JEROME OFFICE ASPEN CO LLC JOHNSON STANFORD H 19 W MAIN ST #203 715 W MAIN ST #201 PO BOX 32102 ,SPEN, CO 81611 ASPEN, CO 81611 TUCSON, AZ 85751 KLEIN DEBBIE :ENT MARY SUE 1/2 KNIGHT GLENDA C A COLORADO CORPORATION 28 W HOPKINS AVE . 546 MCSKIMMING RD PO BOX 328 4SPEN, CO 81611 SNOWMASS, CO 81654 ASPEN, CO 81611 LARY LANCE R :OELLE ALICE KRAHE SHARON PRINCE ANNMARIE )0 BOX 2871 PO BOX 8615 719 W MAIN ST #301 BPEN, CO 81612 ASPEN, CO 81612 ASPEN, CO 81611 .ENIO TED LEVIN WILLIAM A LUU INVESTMENTS LLC 1/OANN LENIO 1 PENN PLAZA #725 435 E MAIN ST '37 W BLOOMFIELD NEW YORK, NY 10119 ASPEN, CO 81611 TOME, NY 13440 MAEWEST LLC .YLE ALEXANDER T MADSEN MARTHA W ATTN: DOROTHY A SHARP '19 W MAIN ST #204 608 W HOPKINS AVE APT 9 706 WEST MAIN \SPEN, CO 81611 ASPEN, CO 81611 ASPEN, CO 81611 AAHONY KAITILIN MANCLARK WILLIAM & DARLEEN TRUST MARCUS ANN H 70 W 74TH ST #809 313 E BAY FRONT 735 W BLEEKER ST JEW YORK, NY 10023 BALBOA ISLAND, CA 92662 ASPEN, CO 81611-1133 AARSHALL ELLEN M & THOMAS M MARTINEAU DANIEL J & AMY N S MAWICKE FREDERICK H 100 RIVERSIDE AVE 201 SOUTH 7TH ST 719 W MAIN #205 ASPEN, CO 81611 ASPEN, CO 81611 ASPEN, CO 81611 .. ;35 WEST BLEEKER LLC 715 W MAIN LLC ALLEN DOUGLAS P :/O NANCY SPEARS 715 W MAIN ST #101 403 LACET LN i O BOX 2630 ASPEN, CO 81611 ASPEN, CO 81611 ,SPEN, CO 81612 4SPEN/PITKIN COUNTY HOUSING BARBER EDGAR F BERR LLC UTHORITY PO BOX 9678 611 W MAIN ST 30 E MAIN ST #001 ASPEN, CO 81612 ASPEN, CO 81611 4SPEN, CO 81611 1LANCHARD NATALIE M 33% BODURTHA SUSAN M BRINKMEYER THOMAS K 00 N 8TH ST 719 W MAIN ST #206 PO BOX 9022 SPEN, CO 81611 ASPEN, CO 81611 ASPEN, CO 81612 CHRISTIAN SCIENCE SOCIETY IRYAN SHEILAH JUDITH BULICZ KEITH ASPEN/SNOWMASS INC '0 BOX 976 PO BOX 2826 734 W MAIN ST ,SPEN, CO 81612 ASPEN, CO 81612 ASPEN, CO 81611 :HRISTOPHER MARIDEE CITY OF ASPEN COSCARELLO ROBERT & ELIZABETH 830 E HAYWARD AVE #1 130 S GALENA ST 8435 FRANKLIN AVE 'HOENIX, AZ 85020-4414 ASPEN, CO 81611 LOS ANGELES, CA 90069-1502 CROCKETT E DAVID TRUSTEE :OULTER G LYNNIE DART ELIZABETH RODWELL CROCKETT ANN RAE TRUSTEE )O BOX L3 633 W MAIN ST 10898 MORA DR ,SPEN, CO 81612 ASPEN, CO 81611 LOS ALTOS HILLS, CA 94024 )UNSDON S MICHAELE END TERRY FELD ANNE S IORKENHAGEN DAVID A PO BOX 747 1700 PACIFIC AVE STE 4100 ;17 W MAIN ST #D ASPEN, CO 81612 DALLAS, TX 75201 BPEN, CO 81611-1619 -ISHER DONNA S FRANCIS TIMOTHY P & MARY VIRGINIA FREUND ROYAL ;05 W MAIN ST PENTHOUSE B 711 W BLEEKER 51 ROARING FORK DR 4SPEN, CO 81611 ASPEN, CO 81611 ASPEN, CO 81611 JAMARRA ANA M & JUAN C GIBSON ASPEN PROPERTIES LLC GOLDSMITH ELLEN )O BOX 9877 715 W MAIN ST STE #203 719 W MAIN ST #101 \SPEN, CO 81612 ASPEN, CO 81611 ASPEN, CO 81611 HAISFIELD MICHAEL DOUGLAS & LISA 3RUETER PAUL ERICH HAHN ELIZABETH EVANS YERKE '19 W MAIN ST #103 257 MOUNTAIN CT 616 W HOPKINS lSPEN, CO 81611 BASALT, CO 81621 ASPEN, CO 81611 .. ACDANIEL SHANNON B MEYER LAURA MEYER MARY ANNE 19 W MAIN ST #100 134 S 7TH ST PO BOX 11238 ,SPEN, CO 81611 ASPEN, CO 81611 ASPEN, CO 81612 OLSHAN BURTON D 1/2 AOUNTAIN RESCUE ASPEN INC NEVINS WENDY S OLSHAN KATHLEEN W 1/2 30 W MAIN ST 736 HOPKINS AVE 5408 OLD LEEDS RD ,SPEN, CO 81611 ASPEN, CO 81611 BIRMINGHAM, AL 35210 )NEIL BRIAN & SUZANNE P B HOLDINGS LLC PARKER GALE M ~ O BOX 199 725 W BLEEKER ST PO BOX 1490 -AVERNIER, FL 33070 ASPEN, CO 81611 ASPEN, CO 81612 'ATERSON CHARLES & FONDA PATRICK KEVIN PEARSON MARK M & LEES M ,00 W HOPKINS AVE 730 E DURANT AVE @200 702 W MAIN ST GPEN, CO 81611 ASPEN, CO 81611 ASPEN, CO 81611 LEED BRENT HAMPTON 67% REID BETSEY M REID SUZANNAH V K 00 N 8TH ST 59 FALLON DR PO BOX 10443 SPEN, CO 81611 NORTH HAVEN, CT 06473 ASPEN, CO 81612 BIO ASPEN PROPERTIES LLC RODRIGUEZ JOANN ROJAK JOHN ;05 W MAIN ST #002 PO BOX 2296 170 W 74TH ST #809 BPEN, CO 81611 ASPEN, CO 81612 NEW YORK, NY 10023 SHADOW MTN CORP STARFORD PROPERTIES NV lUSSO NICK A C/O FINSER CORP C/O KEON WILLIAM ~0 BOX 4743 550 BILTMORE WAX SUITE 900 550 BILTMORE WY 9TH FL \SPEN, CO 81612 CORAL GABLES, FL 33134-5779 CORAL GABLES, FL 33134 ;TIRLING WILLIAM SUTHERLAND ELIZABETH TAYLOR JOHN W 3/0 STIRLING HOMES INC 719 W MAIN ST #202 31050 W THOMPSON LN ;00 E MAIN ST #102 HARTLAND, WI 53029 ASPEN, CO 81611 4SPEN, CO 81611 HROM DOUGLAS H VALLEY MIA VERELLEN VIRGILE & CLAUDIA ;17 W MAIN ST 740 W HOPKINS AVE 449 E COOPER \SPEN, CO 81611 ASPEN, CO 81611 ASPEN, CO 81611 /IEIRA LINDA 50% INTEREST WABISZEWSKI SUSAN 1/2 WEIEN J ROBERT -IALL TERESA 50% INTEREST 728 W HOPKINS AVE 709 W MAIN ST ;05 W MAIN ST ASPEN, CO 81611 ASPEN, CO 81611 \SPEN, CO 81611 . . h .. WESTCHESTER INVESTMENTS INC VEST ALFRED P JR & LORALEE S WHITFIELD DONNAMARIE C C/O FINSER CORP 48416475 METAVANTE WAY 732 W HOPKINS AVE #A3 550 BILTMORE WAY SUITE 900 ;IOUX FALLS, SD 57186 ASPEN, CO 81611 CORAL GABLES, FL 33134-5779 VIDEN SHARI WINGSTONE TOY COMPANY LLC YOUNG DONALD L ~O BOX 4929 12 GREENBRIAR LN 617 W MAIN ST ,SPEN, CO 81612 PAOLI, PA 19301 ASPEN, CO 81611 'OUNG JENNIFER A YULE LEAH E & BRADLEY A 'O BOX 9492 130 S 7TH ST #B 2 4SPEN, CO 81612 ASPEN, CO 81611 56 ~ Public Notice Sunday, February 13, 2005 â€¢ Aspen Times Weekly PUBLIC NOTICE PUBUC NOTICE WHEREAS, the amendments herein relate z RE: 701 W. MAIN STREET HISTORIC LANDMARK COUNTY COURT, Pm(IN COUNTY, COLORADO to the following Sections of the Land Use Code, ! LOT SPLIT Case No. 02( 183 Title 26 of the Aspen Municipal Code: i NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that a public IN THE MATTER OF THE PETITION OF: 26.710.190 - Lodge Tourist Residential (LTR) hearing will be held on Monday, February 28, Brenda Gayle Brokamp, Parent/Petitioner Zone District page 2, 2005 at a meeting to begin at 5:00 p.m. before the for Minor Child: Dustin Joseph Keller, 26.710.200 - Commercial Lodge (CL) Zone Dis- Aspen City Council, City Council Chambers, City FOR A CHANGE OF NAME TO: Dustin Joseph Ket- trict page 5. Hall, 130 S. Galena St., Aspen. to consider an ap- Jer Brokamp 26.710.310 - Lodge Overlay (lit) Zone Dis- plication submitted by Marshall and Susan Olsen Public Notice is given that on September 4,2002, trict page 7, affecting the property located at 701 W. Main by an Order of the Court, Pitkin County, Colora- 26.710.320 - Lodge Preservation Overlay (LP) Street, Lots H and 1, less the westerly 2.35 feet of do, the following name was changed: Zone District page 9, Lot H, Block 19, City and Townsite of Aspen. The name of Dustin Joseph Keller, was changed 26.104.100 - Definition of -Lodge" Council is asked to grant a historic landmark lot to Dustin Joseph Keller Brokamp. page 10; and, split, Patrick Peterson, Clerk of Court WHEREAS, pursuant to Section 26,310, ap- For further information, contact Amy Guthrie at By /s/ Deputy Clerk plications to amend the text ot Title 26 of the Mu- the City of Aspen Community Development De- Published in The Aspen Times on February 13, nicipal Code shall be reviewed and recommend- partment, 130 S. Galena St. Aspen, CO, (970) 429- 20,27, 2005. (2369) ed for approval, approval with conditions, or de- 2758, amyg@ci.aspen.co.us. nial by the Community Development Director and s/Helen Kalin Klanderud, Mayor then by the Planning and Zoning Commission at a Aspen City Council public hearing. Final action shall be by City Court PUBLIC NOTICE Published in The Aspen Times on February 13, cil after reviewing and considering these recom- Aspen-Pitkin County Airport 2005. (2379) mendations; and, ARFF/SRE Facilitv + ..1.-aL :j,1 ... f.... PUBLIC NOTICE 24 Meetin, o n. i Meâ€¢ting Two DATEtle.cq~~4.j~ HI'C 3/23 TIME 5 PM 94 I r D pM 24 PLACE 130s Gdkna .i ** ... 41 PURPOSE 1. Council will Review a - Mijtoric Lot spart. 2. HPC -lo ge,it Co.eefttd = 4 a frtÂ°'A! I~ra new detod-1 krodure o. f" fâ‚¬â€¢* a nd The t. [f 0.1.*1 Vatianeel : A mricke for 11Â£*Tâ€¢rie L.+ spt,t QÂ°* 007. 52Â£5: A ReJokhoR of-â€¢'h,-4 Lot q.rec trom C,000%10 16,7&St. A {*at tr NinzB.m walh el:ed# Ly LOT-Sf':t frb* 36'40 25.45; A Redvebon .f Mon,â€¢.. l .t area *on 5004 Ao 2,544 - A variaâ€¢e nek+J 411 e get, 614 A'Dâ€¢9 Alâ‚¬1166<wk*26. Re.1.Aeâ€¢U! LS,74 96.4,6,6 0216< Â·661.$.L,4< SeÂ¢â€¢.aÂ£ar>'VWÂ©0(W,ne Eleâ€¢eâ€¢D, â‚¬c.st B.*e 3.et1.d< â‚¬ 1 4 t~stee a.riaÂ« Â«S'anci Rear tert bcâ€¢d< 04 33 Ve.er FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: THE CITY OF ASPEN PLANNING DEPARTMENT 130 S GALENA ST; ASPEN CO (970)920-5090 0 0 EXHIBIT ATTACHMENT 7 AFFIDAVIT OF PUBLIC NOTICE REQUIRED BY SECTION 26.304.060 (E), ASPEN LAND USE CODE ADDRESS OF PROPERTY: 79/ W /0614 , Aspen, CO SCHEDULED PUBLIC HEARING DATE: 3~ 131 03 ,200- STATE OF COLORADO ) ) SS. County of Pitkin ) I. ~Wk wuas l-t~ jl- (name, please print) being or representing all Applicant to the City of Aspen, Colorado. hereby personally certify that I have complied with the public notice requirements of Section 26.304.060 (E) of the Aspen Land Use Code iii the following manner: -'K-- Publication of notice: By the publication in the legal notice section of an official paper or a paper o f general circulation in the City of Aspen at least fifteen (15) days prior to the public hearing. A copy of the publication is attached hereto. Posting of notice: By posting o f notice, which form was obtained from the Community Development Department, which was made of suitable, waterproof materials, which was not less than twenty-two (22) inches wide i and twenty-six (26) inches high, and which was composed of letters not less than one inch in height. Said notice was posted at least fifteen (15) days prior to the public hearing and was continuously visible from the day of , 200 , to and including the date and time of the public hearing. A photograph ofthe posted notice (sign) is attached hereto. Mailing of notice. By the mailing of a notice obtained from the Community Development Department, which contains the information described in Section 26.304.060(E)(2) of the Aspen Land Use Code. At least fifteen (15) days prior to the public hearing. notice was hand delivered or mailed by first class postage prepaid U.S. mail to any federal agency, state, county, municipal government, school, service district or other governmental or quasi-governmental agency that owns property within three hundred (300) feet of the property subject to the development application. The names and addresses of property owners shall be those on the current tax records of Pitkin County as they appeared no mot-e than sixty (60) days prior to the date of the public hearing. A copy of the owners and governmental agencies so noticed is attached hereto. (continued on next page) 4 2 07. 2 2 .9 i d PUBLIC Nf)1'ICE 4 0 to 2 * NJ :. RE: 701 W. MAIN STREET.Â·â€¢HA.1()R 1)EVELOPMENT O tal . SPLITI C;MUS EXEMPTION, AND VARIANCES -0 ... O ~Â© (CC)NCEI'TUAL). HIST<)RIC LAN[)MARK LOT Q -3. 4.k ............,/ 4 0 2005 at a meetin.g to begin at 5:00 p.m. before the Am 44 X.f J... 2 u NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that a public ce c.2 1.k... .Â·' Â· U ~ ~ hearing will be held on Wednesday. March 23. Ucs M E ~ Council Chambers. City Hall. 1:U) S. Galena St. As- Aspen }listoric Preservation Commission, City n E~ pen, to consider an application submitted by 92 -O ul Z - located at 701 W. Main Street. Lots H and I. less Marshall and Sllsan ()!sen affecting the property < 4 k 9 9 the westerly 2.35 feet of Lot H. Block 19. City and l s--4 Townsite of ,Aspen. HI'C is asked ti) Rrai]Â£ Con- e A SO rn Vt 2 2 ceptual approval for a new detached structure on u M d * 0 4 K-4 the property. and to recommend an amendment to a historic landmark lot split that will be re- Et M EER \E ma~ viewed by City Council. The application includes tE 0 5,0 g g \.r~N '8 0 the lollowing variance requests related to the lot 8.E W C 4 12 e E E â€ž C Â¤ el) w E = * =4 split: a variance from the minimum lot width for a hy historic landmark lot split from 60 feet to 57.65 r .= E R .= 0.C . vic ~ 0 ~ 7$ feet. a reduction of the minimum lot area for a N % 1 -M 2 3 21 4 4 O 41 A mum width for a lot that is created by a hist(iric E j .34 9 B. % 2 j~ landmark lot split from 30 feet to 25.65 feet and a histolic landmark lot split from 6.000 square feet ~ to 5. 465 square feet. a variance from the mini- 4 ZteuRRE BA W reduction of the minimum size for a lot that is 4 created by a historic landmark lot split from â‚¬E - :3 x V 3.00() scium feet to 2,565 square feet. The appli- , >.t C cation includes the following variances related to %% JER . â€ž-, '-8 /6 0 N oo to the "Build-to line." "Secondary Mass." and U ..0 .4 4.6.- 0 a new residential building along the alley: a var- lance from Residential Design Standards related P ~ A % b 2 2 -9 3 01 'Building Elements." an east sideyard setback of 16." a west sicliÂ·yard setback 01 3 feet, and a rear M.-4 0 2 bao yard setback of (1 feet. â‚¬51 b ..2 :% %34 E For further ifif<irmati,)11, c(intact Amy Guthrie at â‚¬ 9 ., le UU- partinent. 130 S. Galena St.. Aspen, CO, (970) 429- the City of Aspen Community Development De- r Â¤ th ti~ Â»4 0 4 2758. amy;@ci.aspen.co.us. 02 u .2 o .Â·- u +J.=401-guitÂ©= s/Jeffrey Halferty + 9 c u 8.2 - *14 Chair, Aspen Historic Preservatum Commission CS C' 5 7.8 g Â·C t< 2 U Published iii The Aspen Times M March 6,2005. FC.=; .as .2 Ouzz bo *- (2466) 1,48 .C &)i:El 43 * 54.% C 6 9 44 b uptum A ... /\ ce OAW. CSâ€žD.C A 0 2 - 51)1 2 h 0 Â»O Rezoning or text amendment. Whenever the official zonin district map is in amended incidentf tf 012 22 general revision , whether such enactment of new land use or other ise the an a curate surve ma p or other p on o thee to and listing of ame s and proposed change shall OFFICIAL SEAL vit of N tice" v dged 1~fo)Uf>ttÂ¢L- day s~311 expires: ATTACHMENTS: ng on such am d EIHI 10 HdUIDOJOIId V SPIOININAO 3[HI AO ISIT ATTACHMENT 7 AFFIDAVIT OF PUBLIC NOTICE REQUIRED BY SECTION 26.304.060 (E), ASPEN LAND USE CODE ADDRESS OF PROPERTY: <30 / A 4 Â£6 0 '2~ , Aspen, CO el A A-,4 SCHEDULED PUBLIC HEARING DATE: 4-4/. 6073 , 200~ STATE OF COLORADO ) ) SS. Count, of Pitkin ) . 1 44*28 1 r ~4 - .//041 (name, please print) being or representing an A]*licant to the City of Aspen, Colorado, hereby personally certify that I have complied with the public notice requirements of Section 26.304.060 (E) of the Aspen Land Use Code in the following manner A / l/ Pubheation of}lotice: By the publication in the legal notice section of an official paper or a paper of general circulation in the City of Aspen at least fifteen (15) days prior to the public hearing. A copy of the publication is attached hereto. 0/ Posting of notice: By posting of notice, which form was obtained from the Community Development Department, which was made of suitable, waterproof materials, which was not less than twenty-two (22) inches wide and twenty-six (26) inches high, and which was composed of letters not less than one inch in height. Said notice was posted at least fifteen (15) days prior to the public hearing and was continuously visible from the day of , 200 , to and including the date and time of the public hearing. A photograph of the posted notice (sign) is attached hereto. Mailing of notice. -By the mailing of a notice obtained from the Community Development Department, which contains the information described in Section 26.304.060(E)(2) of the Aspen Land Use Code. At least fifteen (15) days prior to the public hearing, notice was hand delivered or mailed by first class postage prepaid U. S. mail to any federal agency, state, county, municipal government, school, service district or other governmental or quasi-governmental agency that owns property within three hundred (300) feet of the property subject to the development application. The names and addresses of property owners shall be those on the current tax records of Pitkin County as they appeared no more than sixty (60) days prior to the date of the public hearing. A copy of the owners and governmental agencies so noticed is attached hereto. (continued on next page) .. Rezoning or text amendment. Whenever the official zoning district map is in any way to be changed or amended incidental to or as part of a general revision of this Title, or whenever the text of this Title is to be amended, whether such revision be made by repeal ofthis Title and enactment of a new land use regulation, or otherwise, the requirement of an accurate survey map or other sufficient legal description of, and the notice to and listing of names and addresses of owners of real property in the area ofthe proposed change shall be waived. However, the proposed zoning map has been available for public inspection in the planning agency during all birsiness hours for fifteen (15) days prior to the public hearing 16h such amendydnts. 0 Sighature The foregoing "Affidavit ofNotice" was acknowledged before me this / 4Â®day Of 014% 1 < i./1 1 .* , 200.3 by -79,~496. /Tleal- -2.- WITNESS MY HAND AND OFFICIAL SEAL My commission expires: 7~ 7103 9> lfYÂ«Uk-- ~~1-NO~Y.\ Notary Public ,,Â·filIUUx ATTACHMENTS: COPY OF THE PUBLICATION Mv Commission Expires I PHOTOGRAPH OF THE POSTED NOTICE (SIGN) LIST OF THE OWNERS AND GOVERNMENTAL AGENCIES NOTICED BY MAIL .. AMLIN CONNIE E HANLE JEFFREY T HAYES MARY FAMILY PTNSP LTD 19 W MAIN ST #207 126 S 7TH ST PO BOX 497 SPEN, CO 81611 ASPEN, CO 81611 ASPEN, CO 81612 HISPATEL CORP ERRICK DARBY HOOK BRADLEY K & PAMELA D C/O FINSER CORP B KEON 24 W HOPKINS ST 782C NORTH KALAHEO 550 BILTMORE WY SPEN, CO 80611 KAILUA, HI 96734 CORAL GABLES, FL 33134 UNTINGTON TRUST CO NA TRUSTEE IGLEHART JIM IGLEHART JIM /O COATES REID & WALDRON 20 E HYMAN AVE 610 W HALLAM ST 617 W MAIN ST ASPEN, CO 81611 ASPEN, CO 81611 SPEN, CO 81611 ENKINS JULIE N JEROME OFFICE ASPEN CO LLC JOHNSON STANFORD H 19 W MAIN ST #203 715 W MAIN ST #201 PO BOX 32102 SPEN, CO 81611 ASPEN, CO 81611 TUCSON, AZ 85751 KLEIN DEBBIE ENT MARY SUE 1/2 KNIGHT GLENDA C A COLORADO CORPORATION 28 W HOPKINS AVE . 546 MCSKIMMING RD PO BOX 328 SPEN, CO 81611 SNOWMASS, CO 81654 ASPEN, CO 81611 LARY LANCE R DELLE ALICE KRAHE SHARON PRINCE ANNMARIE D BOX 2871 PO BOX 8615 719 W MAIN ST #301 3PEN, CO 81612 ASPEN, CO 81612 ASPEN, CO 81611 ENIO TED LEVIN WILLIAM A LUU INVESTMENTS LLC 'O ANN LENIO 435 E MAIN ST 1 PENN PLAZA #725 17 W BLOOMFIELD ASPEN, CO 81611 NEW YORK, NY 10119 DME, NY 13440 MAEWEST LLC 'LE ALEXANDER T MADSEN MARTHA W ATTN: DOROTHY A SHARP 9 W MAIN ST #204 608 W HOPKINS AVE APT 9 706 WEST MAIN 3PEN, CO 81611 ASPEN, CO 81611 ASPEN, CO 81611 AHONY KAITILIN MANCLARK WILLIAM & DARLEEN TRUST MARCUS ANN H '0 W 74TH ST #809 313 E BAY FRONT 735 W BLEEKER ST EW YORK, NY 10023 BALBOA ISLAND, CA 92662 ASPEN, CO 81611-1133 ARSHALL ELLEN M & THOMAS M MARTINEAU DANIEL J & AMY N S MAWICKE FREDERICK H )0 RIVERSIDE AVE 201 SOUTH 7TH ST 719 W MAIN #205 3PEN, CO 81611 ASPEN, CO 81611 ASPEN, CO 81611 .. 4CDANIEL SHANNON B MEYER LAURA MEYER MARY ANNE 19 W MAIN ST #100 134 S 7TH ST PO BOX 11238 ,SPEN, CO 81611 ASPEN, CO 81611 ASPEN, CO 81612 OLSHAN BURTON D 1/2 IOUNTAIN RESCUE ASPEN INC NEVINS WENDY S OLSHAN KATHLEEN W 1/2 30 W MAIN ST 736 HOPKINS AVE 5408 OLD LEEDS RD SPEN, CO 81611 ASPEN, CO 81611 BIRMINGHAM, AL 35210 iNEIL BRIAN & SUZANNE P B HOLDINGS LLC PARKER GALE M O BOX 199 725 W BLEEKER ST PO BOX 1490 AVERNIER, FL 33070 ASPEN, CO 81611 ASPEN, CO 81612 ATERSON CHARLES & FONDA PATRICK KEVIN PEARSON MARK M & LEES M )0 W HOPKINS AVE 730 E DURANT AVE @200 702 W MAIN ST SPEN, CO 81611 ASPEN, CO 81611 ASPEN, CO 81611 EED BRENT HAMPTON 67% REID BETSEY M REID SUZANNAH V K )0 N 8TH ST 59 FALLON DR PO BOX 10443 SPEN, CO 81611 NORTH HAVEN, CT 06473 ASPEN, CO 81612 ENO ASPEN PROPERTIES LLC RODRIGUEZ JOANN ROJAK JOHN )5 W MAIN ST #002 PO BOX 2296 170 W 74TH ST #809 3PEN, CO 81611 ASPEN, CO 81612 NEW YORK, NY 10023 SHADOW MTN CORP STARFORD PROPERTIES NV JSSO NICK A C/O FINSER CORP C/O KEON WILLIAM ) BOX 4743 550 BILTMORE WAX SUITE 900 550 BILTMORE WY 9TH FL SPEN, CO 81612 CORAL GABLES, FL 33134-5779 CORAL GABLES, FL 33134 -IRLING WILLIAM TAYLOR JOHN W SUTHERLAND ELIZABETH O STIRLING HOMES INC 31050 W THOMPSON LN 719 W MAIN ST #202 0 E MAIN ST #102 HARTLAND, WI 53029 ASPEN, CO 81611 ;PEN, CO 81611 IROM DOUGLAS H VALLEY MIA VERELLEN VIRGILE & CLAUDIA 7 W MAIN ST 740 W HOPKINS AVE 449 E COOPER ;PEN, CO 81611 ASPEN, CO 81611 ASPEN, CO 81611 EIRA LINDA 50% INTEREST WABISZEWSKI SUSAN 1 /2 WEIEN J ROBERT 4LL TERESA 50% INTEREST 728 W HOPKINS AVE 709 W MAIN ST 5 W MAIN ST ASPEN, CO 81611 ASPEN, CO 81611 ;PEN, CO 81611 .. 35 WEST BLEEKER LLC ALLEN DOUGLAS P 715 W MAIN LLC :/O NANCY SPEARS 403 LACET LN 715 W MAIN ST #101 ' O BOX 2630 ASPEN, CO 81611 ASPEN, CO 81611 SPEN, CO 81612 SPEN/PITKIN COUNTY HOUSING BARBER EDGAR F BERR LLC UTHORITY 611 W MAIN ST PO BOX 9678 30 E MAIN ST #001 ASPEN, CO 81611 ASPEN, CO 81612 SPEN, CO 81611 LANCHARD NATALIE M 33% BODURTHA SUSAN M BRINKMEYER THOMAS K )0 N 81-1-1 ST 719 W MAIN ST #206 PO BOX 9022 SPEN, CO 81611 ASPEN, CO 81611 ASPEN, CO 81612 CHRISTIAN SCIENCE SOCIETY RYAN SHEILAH JUDITH BULICZ KEITH ASPEN/SNOWMASS INC O BOX 976 PO BOX 2826 734 W MAIN ST SPEN, CO 81612 ASPEN, CO 81612 ASPEN, CO 81611 HRISTOPHER MARIDEE CITY OF ASPEN COSCARELLO ROBERT & ELIZABETH 330 E HAYWARD AVE #1 130 S GALENA ST 8435 FRANKLIN AVE -IOENIX, AZ 85020-4414 ASPEN, CO 81611 LOS ANGELES, CA 90069-1502 CROCKETT E DAVID TRUSTEE OULTER G LYNNIE DART ELIZABETH RODWELL CROCKETT ANN RAE TRUSTEE D BOX L3 633 W MAIN ST 10898 MORA DR 3PEN, CO 81612 ASPEN, CO 81611 LOS ALTOS HILLS, CA 94024 JNSDON S MICHAELE FELD ANNE S END TERRY ORKENHAGEN DAVID A PO BOX 747 1700 PACIFIC AVE STE 4100 7 W MAIN ST #D ASPEN, CO 81612 DALLAS, TX 75201 3PEN, CO 81611-1619 SHER DONNA S FRANCIS TIMOTHY P & MARY VIRGINIA FREUND ROYAL )5 W MAIN ST PENTHOUSE B 711 W BLEEKER 51 ROARING FORK DR 3PEN, CO 81611 ASPEN, CO 81611 ASPEN, CO 81611 4MARRA ANA M & JUAN C GIBSON ASPEN PROPERTIES LLC GOLDSMITH ELLEN ) BOX 9877 715 W MAIN ST STE #203 719 W MAIN ST #101 3PEN, CO 81612 ASPEN, CO 81611 ASPEN, CO 81611 HAISFIELD MICHAEL DOUGLAS & LISA RUETER PAUL ERICH HAHN ELIZABETH EVANS YERKE 9 W MAIN ST #103 257 MOUNTAIN CT 616 W HOPKINS 3PEN, CO 81611 BASALT, CO 81621 ASPEN, CO 81611 .. VEST ALFRED P JR & LORALEE S WHITFIELD DONNAMARIE C WESTCHESTER INVESTMENTS INC C/O FINSER CORP 8416475 METAVANTE WAY 732 W HOPKINS AVE #A3 ;IOUX FALLS, SD 57186 ASPEN, CO 81611 550 BILTMORE WAY SUITE 900 CORAL GABLES, FL 33134-5779 ADEN SHARI WINGSTONE TOY COMPANY LLC YOUNG DONALD L O BOX 4929 12 GREENBRIAR LN 617 W MAIN ST SPEN, CO 81612 PAOLI, PA 19301 ASPEN, CO 81611 OUNG JENNIFER A YULE LEAH E & BRADLEY A O BOX 9492 130 S 7TH ST#B 2 SPEN, CO 81612 ASPEN, CO 81611 56 ~ Public Notice Sunday, February 13, 2005 â€¢ Aspen Times Weekw PUBUC NOTICE PUBUC NOTICE WHEREAS, the amendments herein relate L RE: 701 W MAIN STREET HISTORIC LANDMARK COUNTY COURT, PITKIN COUNTY, COLORADO to the following Sections of the Land Use Code. f LOT SPUT Case No. 02C183 Title 26 of the Aspen Municipal Code: , NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that a public IN THE MATTER OF THE PETmON OF: 26.710.190 - Lodge Tourist Residential *TR) hearing will be held on Monday, February 28. Brenda Gayle Brokamp, Parent/Petitioner Zone District page 2. 2005 at a meeting to begin at 5:00 p.m. before the for Minor Child: Dustin Joseph Keller, 26.710.200 - Commercial Lodge (CL) Zone Dis- Aspen City Councit, CIty Council Chambers, City FOR A CHANGE OF NAME TO: Dustin Joseph KelÂ· trict page 5, Hall, 130 S. Galena St., Aspen, to consider an ap- ler Brokamp 26.710.310 - Lodge Overlay (LO) Zone Dis- plication submitted by Marshall and Susan Olsen Public Notice is given that on September 4,2002, trict page 7, affecting the property located at 701 W. Main by an Order of the Court. Pitkin County, Colora- 26.710.320 - Lodge Preservation Overlay (LP) Street, Lots H and 1, less tile westerly 235 feet of do, the following name was changed: Zone District page 9, Lot H, Block 19, City and Townsite of Aspen. The name of Dustin Joseph Keller, was changed 26.104.100 - Definition of Â·Lodge" Council is asked to grant a historic landmark lot to Dustin Joseph Keller Brokamp. split. Patrick Peterson, Clerk of Court WHEREAS, pursuant to Section 26.310. apÂ· page 10; and, For further information, contact Amy Guthrie at By /s/ Deputy Clerk pilcations to amend the text of Title 26 of the Mu. the City of Aspen Community Development De- Published in The Aspen Times on February 13, nicipal Code shall be reviewed and recommend- partment, 130 S. Galena St., Aspen, CO, (970) 429- 20,27,2005. (2369) ed for approval, approval with conditions, or de- 2758, amyg@ci.aspen.co.us. nial by the Community Development Djrector and s/Helen Kajin Klanderud, Mayor then by the Planning and Zoning Commission at a Aspen City Council PUBUC NOTICE public hearing. Final action shall be by City Coun- Published in The Aspen Times on February 13, cil after reviewing and considering these recom- 2005. (2379) mendations; and, AspenÂ·Pltkin County Airport ARFF/SRE Fac11[tv 4 5....12 tÂ¥*, 1 00*12 1141 44+0; I.& i. PUBLIC NOTICE 24 )leetin, ons ' Meating Two DATE Co.ri,Pa<%â€¢e~ H PC 3/23 r TINIE 5 pM 4 5 F i City Hall . W PLACE 130 s G alena h. #t -* 6/ 1 PURPOSE 1. Couned will Review a 04:...Â·,%:i Â· 0.*2 Mijtoric Let Sparr. 2. HPC 4Â© ge,it c..e.04 Aff"ME lara Oew detoc~ed Stroctore o. p.. fâ‚¬q>, ond -Ille *6110..45 meiance: : A vartgsee foriliftâ€¢rie 67+ Spl.Y *0. 00-4, 5105: ARâ‚¬4=Kd ofÂ»â€¢,me. lot- grec Pro~ &.ooof4-zo 6,76<~. A rqoat IAâ€¢ Min,149â€¢ willh erâ‚¬ded Ly |Offflit Â·f+0 â€¢ 30'+025-4â‚¬I A Redâ€¢ebon .f M.nâ€¢*e. l,+ area *am 5000% 10 2,5431. A variant te}o:ted -6112 h n Wee 94 AID,9 Alâ‚¬~,6.iArtaed+Cal Cdâ€¢*4*]i#.1 ,11:$14 96464** Gaf.b< 464.0.0&.LÂ·â€¢12 9.c..4%,pMes. 50((oF,1,9 61â‚¬â€¢elÂ¢$, 6.51- 96. 301-~d< 4 r e- ke#tstd?â€¢f 440'14' My mt #w Set 60<k'<>4 32> reer FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: THE CITY OF ASPEN PLANNING DEPARTMENT 130 S GALINA ST: ASPEN CO (970>920Â·5090 Â¥ .1. M- , 7 .. ATTACHMENT 7 AFFIDAVIT OF PUBLIC NOTICE REQUIRED BY SECTION 26.304.060 (E), ASPEN LAND USE CODE ADDRESS OF PROPERTY: 70 C li l /91 c i 91 , Aspen, CO SCHEDULED PUBLIC HEARING DATE: ,200 751Â» 1.06 1 I STATE OF COLORADO ) ) SS. County of Pitkin ) 15 - 3 62(Girco â‚¬- L.-1\U~Of f (name, please print) being or representing an Applicant to the City of Aspen, Colorado, hereby personally certify that I have complied with the public notice requirements of Section 26.304.060 (E) of the Aspen Land Use Code in the following manner: ~ Publication of notice: By the publication in the legal notice section of an official paper or a paper of general circulation in the City of Aspen at least fifteen Il 5) days prior to the public hearing. A copy of the publication is attached hereto. Posting Ofnotice: By posting of notice, which form was obtained from the Community Development Department, which was made of suitable, waterproo f materials, which was not less than twenty-two (22) inches wide and twenty-six (26) inches high, and which was composed of letters not less than one inch in height. Said notice was posted at least fifteen (15) days prior to the public hearing and was continuously visible from the day of , 200 , to and including the date and time of the public hearing. A photograph of the posted notice (sign) is attached hereto. Mailing of notice. By the mailing of a notice obtained from the Community Development Department, which contains the information described in Section 26.304.060(E)(2) of the Aspen Land Use Code. At least fifteen (15) dAys prior to the public hearing, notice was hand delivered or mailed by first class postage prepaid U.S. mail to any federal agency, state, county, municipal government, school. service district or other governmental or quasi-governmental agency that owns property within three hundred (300) feet o f the property subject to the development application. The names and addresses of property owners shall be those on the current tax records of Pitkin County as they appeared no more than sixty (60) days prior to the date of the public hearing. A copy of the owners and governmental agencies so noticed is attached hereto. (continued on next page) .. Rezoning or text amendment. Whenever the official zoning district map is in any way to- be changed or amended incidental to or as part of a general revision o f this Title, or whenever the text of this Title is to be amended, whether such revision be made by repeal o f this Title and enactment of a new land use regulation, or otherwise, the requirement of an accurate survey map or other sufficient legal description of, and the notice to and listing of names and addresses of owners of real property in the area of the proposed change shall be waived. However, the proposed zoning map has been available for public inspection in the planning agency during all business hours for fifteen (15) days prior to the public hearing on such amendments. f 0 1 /0 11 ~6'i,tO--47~14(_ bsignature 1 Th<fareaoing "Affidavit of Notice" was acknowledged before nK t]#is ) 2~ day of 4-vb , 2003 by EN-x_,~ k.17-h cjd-7 56 ~ Public Notice Sl WITNESS MY HAND AND OFFICIAL SEAL PUBLIC NOTICE RE: 7()1 W MAIN STREET HISTORIC LANDMARK LOT SPLIT My commission expires: <DA- N<)TICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that a public hearing will be held on Monday. February 28, A .Â· 1---13 K â‚¬:: 001:Â·RY pulth 20()5 at a meeting to begin at 5:00 p.m. before the Aspen City Council, City Council Chambers, City Hall, 130 S. Galena St,. Aspen, to consider an ap- . plication submitted by Marshall and Susan Olsen Notary Public S i S/Â· HAH E affecting the property located at 701 W. Main Street, Lots H and 1. less the westerly 2.35 feet of hi.. CATES ..6 O Lot H, Block 19, City and Townsite 01 Aspen. . .2 0 Council is asked to grant a historic landmark lot VÂ·Â·*, Â· split. ...;..ky For further information, contact Amy Guthrie at . ,-4 the City of Aspen Community Development De- ~4 7 CO\>' partment, 130 S. Galena St.. Aspen, CO, (970) 429- i k 2758. amyg@ci.aspen.co.us. s/He.en Kalin Klanderud, Mayor Aspen City Council ATTACHMENTS: Published in The Aspen Times on February 13, 2005,(2379) COPY OF THE PUBLICATION PHOTOGRAPH OF THE POSTED NOTICE (SIGN) LIST OF THE OWNERS AND GOVERNMENTAL AGENCIES NOTICED BY MAIL .. DEVELOPMENT ORDER ofthe City of Aspen Community Development Department This Development Order, hereinafter "Order", is hereby issued pursuant to Section 26.304.070, "Development Orders", and Section 26.308.010, "Vested Property Rights", of the City of Aspen Municipal Code. This Order allows development of a site specific development plan pursuant to the provisions of the land use approvals, described herein. The effective date of this Order shall also be the initiation date of a three-year vested property right. The vested property right shall expire on the day after the third anniversary of the effective date of this Order, unless a building permit is approved pursuant to Section 26.304.075, or unless an exemption, extension, reinstatement, or a revocation is issued by City Council pursuant to Section 26.308.010. After Expiration of vested property rights, this Order shall remain in full force and effect, excluding any growth management allotments granted pursuant to Section 26.470, but shall be subject to any amendments to the Land Use Code adopted since the effective date of this Order. This Development Order is associated with the property noted below for the site specific development plan as described below. Marshall and Susan Olsen, P.O. Box 12228, Aspen, CO 81612,925-3628. Property Owner's Name, Mailing Address and telephone number 701 W. Main Street, Lots H and 1, less the west 2.35 feet of Lot H. Block 19, City and Townsite of Aspen. Colorado Legal Description and Street Address of Subject Property HPC has approved plans for an on-site relocation of an existing cabin. along with a setback variance. Written Description of the Site Specific Plan and/or Attachment Describing Plan Approved per Resolution #6. Series of 2005. passed on February 9.2005. Land Use Approval(s) Received and Dates (Attach Final Ordinances or Resolutions) Februarv 20,2005 Effective Date of Development Order (Same as date ofpublication of notice of approval.) February 20.2008 Expiration Date of Development Order (The extension, reinstatement, exemption from expiration and revocation may be pursued in accordance with Section 26.308.010 of the City of Aspen Municipal Code.) Issumdathis 204 day of February, 2005, by the City of Aspen Community Development Director. UNY\ M_, Chris Bendon, Community Development Director FE.- 1 . ORNIN;3 AND DAVID HILI_ ~ FAX NO. : 970 923 6677 ~an. 13 2005 01:35PM Pl ,= .tOM : J %11 *10 I.IND 15.010 1 9 HiLL /Ax NO. 1970 923 0877 Jon. 113 33(35 let: 241Â·t ; Post-irÂ® Fax Note 7671 Dere '26/6-&86â€¢ / TO Z>~Â·LÂ·Â£-4- Frortl~ A Â· Co-/Dept. 67 co. 6/ Phone # 42-9 -/1 0 + Phone # 92-3 -6677 '* 0 9 2-5- -21-60 ~ Faic # }hil'&49 4 2005 it. A. d.11.1. fil*,io p.swâ€¢-n O.W. ALTUWPItkka Co.:=hy Devol... Dept iso SÂ· 831=m k 2-COMI, CO 0161 1 tto: 7811 15,sE Mi~ St DZ (my: junui U & 089*0â€¢01 40â€¢44 ti December 1. 200~ - the,adent.ned authmize a Und use Â®05Â£2609 0 be,-02*illib,Mar-D 0. 010., a lu. A 0110â€¢. Ho,-715 4Nh'Closh,B 64 flp' 6.*=* 11 aeâ€¢ 40.0/0/d 64& J.lit/py 14. 11'05, thitt tliÂ« aut,/31,//tkm i. whilirmwn -eGAa -2. Anma =d Siman Bailey .. RESOLUTION OF THE ASPEN HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION GRANTING APPROVAL FOR ON-SITE RELOCATION AND SETBACK VARIANCES FOR THE PROPERTY LOCATED AT 701 W. MAIN STREET, LOTS H and I, LESS THE WEST 2.35 FEET OF LOT H, BLOCK 19, CITY AND TOWNSITE OF ASPEN, COLORADO RESOLUTION NO. 6, SERIES OF 2005 Parcel ID #:2735-124-46-004 WHEREAS, the applicants, Marshall and Susan Olsen. have requested On-Site Relocation and Setback Variances for the cabin located at 701 W. Main Street. Lots H and L less the west 2.35 feet of Lot H, Block 19. City and Townsite of Aspen. Colorado. aiid WHEREAS, in order to approve relocation, according to Section 26.415.090.C, Relocation of a Designated Property, it must be determined that: 1. It is considered a non-contributing element of a historic district and its relocation will not affect the character of the historic district; gr 2. It does not contribute to the overall character of the historic district or parcel on which it is located and its relocation will not have an adverse impact on the historic district or property; or 3. The owner has obtained a Certificate of Economic Hardship; 11[ 4. The relocation activity is demonstrated to be an acceptable preservation method given the character and integrity of the building, structure or object and its move will not adversely affect the integrity of the historic district in which it was originally located or diminish the historic, architectural or aesthetic relationships of adjacent designated properties; and Additionally. for approval to relocate all of the following criteria must be met: 1. It has been determined that the building, structure or object is capable of withstanding the physical impacts of relocation; and 2. An appropriate receiving site has been identified; and 3. An acceptable plan has been submitted providing for the safe relocation, repair and preservation of the building, structure or object including the provision of the necessary financial security; and WHEREAS, for approval of setback variances, the HPC must review the application. a staff analysis report and the evidence presented at a hearing to determine. per Section 26.415.110.C of the Municipal Code. that the setback variance: a. Is similar to the pattern. features and character of the historic property or district. and/or b. b. Enhances or mitigates an adverse impact to the historic significance or architectural character of the historic property. an adjoining designated historic property or historic district; and .. WHEREAS, Amy Guthrie. in her staff report dated February 9.2005. performed an analysis of the application based on the standards, and recommended the application be approved with conditions; and WIIEREAS, at a regular meeting held on February 9,2005, the Historic Preservation Commission considered the application. found the application to meet the standards. and approved the application by a vote of 3 to 1. THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED: That the H PC approves the on-site relocation of the cabin located at 701 W. Main Street. Lots H and L less the west 2.35 feet of Lot H, Block 19. City and Townsite of Aspen, Colorado. in addition to Setback Variances. with the following conditions: 1. On-site relocation of the cabin to Lot A (the corner lot) is approved. Relocation of this building onto a new foundation, and rehabilitation of the structure must be the first action that is taken to redevelop this property. It will not be acceptable to move the building and -mothball" it. in favor of undertaking construction on the vacant parcel. 9 . The front yard setback for the historic cabin must be 10 feet. A sideyard setback variance has been approved to allow the cabin to be 1'6" from the east property line. iii part to avoid a conflict between the cabin and the large spruce tree at the front of the site. If the spruce tree is removed before the relocation of the cabin. then the variance iS 110 longer iii effect. 3. A structural report demonstrating that the buildings can be moved and/or information about how the house will be stabilized from the housemover illust be submitted with the building permit application. 4. A bond or letter of credit in the amount of $30,000 to insure the safe relocation of the structure must be submitted with the building permit application. 5. A relocation plan detailing how and where the building will be stored and protected during construction must be submitted with the building permit application. APPROVED BY THE COMMISSION at its regular meeting on the 9th day of February, 2005. Approved as to Form: David Hoefer, Assistant City Attorney Approved as to Content: HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION Jeffrey Halferty, Chair ATTEST: Kathy Strickland, Chief Deputy Clerk . .. *' D i E-P The choice for external features of the cabin Page 1 '-*.4:fgtlo-, Â£-l Through our research at the Pitkin County assessor's office, the Aspen Historical Society and Internet sources for the US Census records, we believe the building was constructed sometime before 1910. The Assessor's records show the lot was homesteaded on 8/17/07 by J. M. Courner. The next record which was found at the assessor's office shows the sale of the lot by Kobey Clothing and Shoe C. to Mr. Peterson in 1909. There is no record of construction but a cabin must have been erected on the lot because the 1910 census at the Historical Society shows that the Peterson family was living at 701 W. Main Street. The 1920 census also shows that Linnea Peterson was recorded as the head of the family, living in the cabin. Also recorded are her children, residing at 701 Main Street. The information from the internet corroborates that found in the Pitkin County assessor's office as well as the Aspen Historical Society that a cabin existed at 701 Main Street. Although we could not locate a document to record the sale from the Petersons to a Mr. Herman Nelson, the record indicates that the property was taken by the City of Aspen for tax arrears in 1932. In 1948 Mr. Herman Nelson purchased the property from the city of Aspen for back taxes. In 19511 Mr. Nelson sold the property to Mr. Ray Nelson. Sometime during the period the Nelsons owned the property, we believe that the front and rear additions were added and the Asphalt siding added. This history of the cabin shows the original exterior was not covered with Asphalt siding. From this history and the events that transpired from 1907, it is our conclusion that the original structure was built sometime between 1907 and the time the Peterson family moved in. It is obvious that the original structure had some other kind of outside siding rather than the current asphalt siding since the attached articles indicate Asphalt siding was not available at the time the cabin was originally constructed. We know from examining the building interior after removing the plasterboard that there were two subsequent additions, the front room and the lean-to in the rear. .. Page 2 The current asphalt siding covered all three parts of the house and was obviously installed at the same time, possibly in 1948 or after by Mr. Nelson when this type of siding was available (see attached articles by Asphalt siding manufacturers). We have attached photos representative of types of siding used at the time the cabin was constructed. These are horizontal clapboard or vertical board and baton. The Historical Preservation Policies, Criteria and Design Guidelines, page 8 states: "Preserve original building materials and features. We believe this dictates that either Clapboard or Board and Baton siding should be used. Page 17, paragraph 4, states: "During the quiet years (1900 to 1930) homes were vacant, stores empty and the grand architecture of the commercial and residential blocks entered a long stage of deterioration and neglect. Entire blocks were barren without a single occupied house and buildings stood as bare skeletons, the victims of salvaging for materials, fire and vandalism." We believe that during the quiet years, the Peterson family left the cabin and while it was vacant, whatever siding had been on the outside was removed and stolen. Page 55 of the guidelines shows typical historic siding materials as wood stone and brick. There is no mention of Asphalt siding. Wooden choices include shingle, ship-lap clapboard and board and batten wooden siding types. On Page 59, the guidelines state: "Consider removing inappropriate covering materials, such as Asphalt siding." Considering the above facts, we propose any type of wooden siding that HPC would propose. Mastic History Page 1 of 2 0 .1 Ute MasticÂ®Advantage . 70 years of innovative ideas â€¢ Created Inselbrick asphalt siding, the i 1930s maintenance siding product t -=F & r 2Za solutions. 1940s . Continued to search for low-maintenai â€¢ Began manufacturing aluminum sidint Mastic's 1932 introduction of â€¢ Created the first woodgrain aluminum Inselbrick, the first low-maintenance â€¢ Developed the Z4ine clip-on system fi exterior, laid the groundwork for 1950s siding - the forerunner of today's syste Mastic's development of vinyl siding. â€¢ Began developing vinyl siding. â€¢ Introduced the revolutionary T-lokÂ® pi - 1960s which enhanced the strength and stabi siding. â€¢ In 1969, introduced the T-lok vinyl pa Barkwood K. â€¢ Created DuranylÂ®, a proprietary comp, 1970s process that produces a more durable, 40- â€¢ Added the extra sun-fading resistance 1980s resin, manufactured by GE Plastics. â€¢ Introduced new colors and styles. â€¢ Pioneered the development of Dutch li Generations of Contractors have recommended Mastic, in part, because and cedar-look sidings. of continual product improvements like â€¢ Introduced QUEST:'Series ' premium the widely copied T-lokÂ® system. 199OS setting new standards for toughness an â€¢ T-lok Barkwood i reaches its 30th yeai the industry's most recognized and pot 01-]li.b _ â€¢ Mastic continues to develop and imprc r..m'.0. V.... S"".0 2000s siding technology and products to meâ‚¬ and desires of a new generation of Am homeowners. â€¢ Created new, dark QUEST3 Series' cc f / Ll rich, contemporary look: Sawmill, Rec ll 19 3 Pine Needle. - â€¢ Developed C arvedwood., Series, avail finishes - textured cedar and smoothly and a wide array of profiles and colors â€¢ Mastic nows offers Cedar Discoverr'-' > shingle look product with none of the http://www.mastic.com/advantagehistory.asp 08/22/2005 EDCO Page 1 of 1 .. 8-41112111411-a Home E Our Company i Products i Edcoat Coil Coating i Dealer Locator i Contact U5 The History of Edco Products, Inc. In 1946, the American dream was alive and flourishing. World War II had ended, and tlie future was full of liope and opportunity. As people began to rebuild their lives, Arthur O. Edwards began to build a business to help a A prospering population realize their dreams for new homes. AiI0IIIA Edwards 1)egan manufacturing insulated asphalt siding with his father and brother. It was the right product at the ~ right time - the siding was economical and very easy to ~ maintain. In fact, it was this very siding that helped Vt. pioneer the concept of "virtually maintenance-free" to the , housing industry. Sales soared along with the post-war home construction boom, and EDCO Products, Inc. was born. 7~ Based in Hopkins, Minnesota, EDCO Products, Inc.'s mission was simple: provide customers with the best products available. Today, EDCO is tile largest producer of ....,-Â¥.1 residential steel siding in the country, with an expanded line of prefinished exterior building products to serve both ~ residential and commercial markets. After almost six decades of business, EDCO hasn't lost sight of its original mission. Iii everything we do, we remain committed to craftsmanship, innovation and excellence. Read more al)out Out Philosophy Back to Oili Company Creating Permanent Exteriors Since 1946 Home I Our Company I Products I Edcoat Coil Coating I Dealer Locator I Contact Us 61.2003 Edco Products. All Rights Reserved. Legal Disclaimer. http://www. edcoproducts.com/company/history.asp 08/22/2005 ~ Page l of 2 SITE 5EAROI IKeywords... m, ANNUALREPORT&ACTION PLAN fREE E-NEWSLETTER STAFF DIRECTORY FAQ5 RELATED LIm(5 SITE MAP HOME V/,zo.39!22.44 IF) 2,0:Dfm]:Do:taN>0:8:[E 0Â·32(3031**1:;WEU\Jeft mktmil,mlijmillm 1 O112liNOim@iidiN I gy}j]Â§3111batkgima I litg!1*11~jime~d~hiÂ» 1 [AEOZIOEm I @*hlilliqB,2~Ilim9i:&[ililIZI~1 HIbTORIC PROPERilt National Register of Historic Places I .4,1,Â·t , 1 '"i:- i N Â· 1: Il' :.:': !-:,1<'. r .i A:i,~' NATIONAL REGISTER OF HISTORIC PLACES ASPHALT ROOFING MATERIALS 3 National Register 01 Historic Places M How to Get a Pt operty Listed F~ 1 Coniposition roofing materials using I Artificial Sidinq Policy I fabrics covered with pine tar or sand 51 Residential Siding Materials in Arkansas 521 7 42'. were in use on the East Coast by the m Survey & Documentation L.-1 '62 .u>. 18405. This form was later improved M Search Arkansas National Register Listings ~t=:rtu through coatings of asphalt and tale, CS Nalional Regisler Nonlinalion rolf Ti -- - sandi powdered limestone or gravel to 1 Determination of tligibllity Fol-Ins ~ add color and endurance. Modern Â® FI-equently Asked Questions Asphalt hexagonal roofing Ehingles were formed from shingles were used Â® Related i inks as alternative wal/ units of felt saturated with asphalt, a coverings jn gable bitumen produced from refined ends and dormers. petroleurn, anc! colored ruirieral or ceramic greticles. Shingles cut from rolls in 8" X 12 1/2" shapes made their appearance in 1903 in rectangular and hexagonal fot rns. The Prepared Roofing Manufacturers Association was formed in 1911 to dvance the sales of asphalt products ~ and to improve upon thern while widening the market.[60] While asphalt was not yet sweeping the nation as a wall covering in the early twentieth century, there were mui-rnurings among the construction industry about applying it as siding in remodeling jobs. Architect Charles G. Peker wrote in a 1918 issue of American Builder that chipped slate asphalt roll roofing could be used as a substitutte for stucco in the gable end of a house, creating a half-timbered effect. It also served as an inf;tilating covering when nailed over drafty wooden drop siding. r611 Hexagonal and rectangular asphalt shingles marketed nationwide as wall covering did not appear until 1929. Those shingles can still be spied on sidewalls of dormers oron outbuildings in rural areas of Arkansast howeve[ such cove,ings could have been roofing shingles applied pre-1929. Perhaps as a sign of the times asphalt was primarily offered as a renovation material that eliminated the need to paint wooden siding. Rooting ..rÂ¥ 1 companies were left with a glut of material when tile Depression forestalled new [12~j construction, so they augmented their manufacturer's lines witt; offerings that catered to the current building market and offered the look of traditional materials < at a lower price. Johns-Manville and Certain-teed Products Company offered a strip shingle with a 2-1/2" exposure and 9-1/2" length in imitation of brick in 1931. Each 3 '44 - th-, strip shingle was divided into individual "bricks" available in red, buff or gray Garages and featuring "mortar" lines in white, brown or black. Falix brick was the prevailing outbuildings would asphalt siding style during the 19305. Mastic Corporation repoited that 100% of its sometimes be sheathed .I...imli~~. sales in 1935 were in the brick design maiketed as panels called in rectangular asphalt fah==974+ .terÂ«Â·,; T:; : Inselbric, but wall shingles were still inarketed in a var-iety of shingles. 1 ~ patterns and colors such as rectangular, hexagonal and #i~ pyrainidal in green, tan and blended.-621 li~~~~~~-.~~- In 1940 Sears, Roebuck & Company catalogues offered brick-type insulating panels in 14" X 43" units, five bricks high and four-point (hexagonal) asphalt siding in brown Asphalt strip shingles in imitation tone, red tone, jade green and tile red. Advances in the production of roll roofing of brick hit the introduced heated rollers that pressed detailed pattei ns into market in the early granulated surfaces, making it possible to offer relied asphalt brick siding in the early file://C:\DOCUME-1\ADMINI-1\LOCALS-1\Temp\QALIFYFA.htm 8/2/2005 ~ Page 2 of 2 1930s. 1940s.[63.1 By 1941 Sears invited customers to "make old houses - look new" by applying Honor Bi!t Brick Roll Type =iding iii 32" X 43' sections, which was offered iii addition to the four brick double lap siding - marketed by - T the company beginning circa 1937. To lend a finished look to the job accessory strips for inside and outside corners, edge trim and soldier courses were available. By 1943 - Â·6 they included 32" X 43' asphalt rolls of irregulaily coursed "ashldr 16/Millid stone" (also known as Inselstone) in gray.,641 The 1954 Sears Rolled asphalt brici catalogue introduced a new insulating stone design called "Ranch siding was made Stone", featuring elongated multi-colored asphalt units resetnbling possible through the cut-sandstone in irregular courses on 15" X 48" panels. Color introduction of -- selections were gray/green and crab orchard. [65] Ill 1966 the heated rollers that - Sears, Roebuck catalogue featitred "Random Stone" as a new skiing pressed patterns Asphalt roils that product. This was very similar to Ranch Stone but it included into the surface. imitated irregular courses of cut stone randomly placed raked shapes in iniitation of,vit-e-cut bricks among the multi-colored could be purchased units. Random Stone consisted of wood fiber insulation board itupregnated with bitumen by the early 19405. at-\C thickly overlaid with mineral-stabilized asphait on the weathet side and 5,11 faced with mineral granules for color. Color ranges became rather elaborate in comparison to earlier asphall siding choices. The color selections were referred to as "Holiday," which v,as brown and light gi-ay with coral highlights and beige mortar, 'Riviera," consisting of shades of gray with occasional coral and gray mortal- and "Ldkeside," displaying green overtones with harmonizing gray and beige morter.-06] I -n ... . - Â·-7---/Z~UD-â€¢ .le=i==Er The popular 19505 look of cut Mid-15605 Random Stone was sandstone could be achieved similar to Ranch Stone but it through the inexpensive featured a wire-cut brick shape apphtation of Ranch Stone among the "courses" of stone asphalt siding shapes. 1 :1 i Historic Properties ! Preservation Services I Main Street Arkansas I Tours, Events & Workshops I Publications Frequently Asked Questions I Archaeology & Section 106 Review I Annual Report & Action Plan Free E-Newsletter ! Staff Directory ! Related Links I Site Map I Site Search I Home ARKANSAS HISTORIC PRESERVATION PROGRAM 1500 Tower Building, 323 Center Street - Little Rock, Arkansas 72201 Phone: (501) 324-9880 - Fax: ( 501) 324-9184 - E-Mail: int. arkanseS:)re-Â·--Â·.'ation.org ilaa= EX= A 1,â€¢mt pvag- A- 42/16# D'ID--â€¢â€¢ OIl}EWEFERE E ' â‚¬11 ,'Uk=-26 14~5â€¢415 ...... Copyright Â·C,2004 Arkansas Historic Preservation Program - Web Services by Aristotle V,lei; Detign. file://C:\DOCUME-1\ADMINI-1\LOCALS-l\Temp\QALIFYFA.htm 8/2/2005 W,ba _2 -- 2 -- . CA*Â· v.r' Russell C~mp's Photo Archive ~ To Table of Contents EARL, LAS ANIMAS, COLORADO Picture #191 Photo Date: 04/15/1931 Const. Date: 01/01/1881 Mile Post: 618.4 Railroad: AT&SF P. :2 , it 1 Description: Earl, Colorado Section house 18' x 30'two story board and batten built 1881 photographed April 15, 193 1 it-- - , Russell Crump's Photo Archive To Table of Contents COLORADO SPRINGS, EL PASO, COLORADO 4: - 'r. ' 4 ./7...Im"/8#9 62% Picture #284 Photo Date: , 1 - I.'A -â€ž 05/07/1931 Const. Date: Y dr 01/01/1888 *Ill:' Mile Post: 663.2 s t Railroad: 4 7 '. 7..h . AT&SF i I I. 1 . aff 1.11 1 T .1 5 4 4 1.â€¢ 5 Description: Colorado Springs, Colorado section house single story 28' x 31' built 1888 photo May 7, 1931 /IL.Z-/--. ,~ -...... -p-/1- / T Russell C~iip's -/:h Photo Archive ~ To Table of Contents COLORADO SPRINGS, EL PASO, COLORADO ,~ Picture #268 Photo Date: *4'39.43..r ;,t - f ... 5/7/193 1 r. Const. Date: $ 01/01/1892 Mile Post: 74 9 Railroad: AT&SF /7 El#:I . 4-Â¢f 0:' 3 ~ Description: Colorado Springs, Colorado Switch Shanty 16' x 20' wood built 1892 photographed May 7, 1931 i .- - Wb -1.- Russell Crump's Photo Archive To Table of Contents BREED, EL PASO, COLORADO i :./ 1Â¥Â£*,4 ''.Â·' 1% i .... + I '4 â‚¬ - . â€¢i.' i Fle , ri. 9 7. 1 * . re@F. 0.... 1[ 4 -4. 2. 1,/ Picture #305 '111Â¥ . i Â¢* F . Photo Date: 4 - r 05/07/1931 1.1~4 ; ~*tiM- . Const. Date: j . 01/01/1888 4 Mile Post: 0 - 669.2 LE - 1 Railroad: ./4 - AT&SF 4 IF Ancestry.com - Global Search Results Page 1 of 2 0 . , *cdtn'.com Welcome. marshall I Log Out IUpgrade I MM-83 Discover Your Family Story Home My Ancestry Search Records Family Trees Message Boards Learning Center Sho Census Results matching your search for Linnea Peterson in Colorado during 1865 All Records > Census Viewlrâ€ž Narrow your search Match Name Event BUIate, --~~.-Quality **** Linnea Peterson Birth: abt 1865 - Sweden - All Records Residence: 1920 - Aspen, Pitkin, Colorado <St---$ Source: Census - 1920 United States Federal Census/ â€¢ 1930 United States *** Linnea Peterson Birth: abt 1880 Federal Census Residence: 1930 - Colorado Springs, El Paso, Colora, Source: Census - 1930 United States Federal Census â€¢ 1900 United States Federal Census *** Linnea Peterson Birth: abt 1911 â€¢ 1920 United States Pesidence: 1930 - Grand Junction, Mesa, Colorado Federal Census Source: Census - 1930 United States Federal Census â€¢ 1910 United States Federal Census Linnea Peterson Birth: 1875 - Sweden â€¢ 1880 United States Residence: 1900 - Clcero, Cook, Illinois Federal Census Other: 1896 Source: Census - 1900 United Statei Federal Census â€¢ 1870 United States Federal Census *** Carl O Peterson Birth: abt 1884 - Sweden ~ â€¢ Iowa State Census, 1895 Residence: 1930 - Colorado Springs, El Paso, Colora, Source: Census - 1930 United States Federal Census â€¢ Nebraska State Census 1885 1 *** Erland I Peterson Birth: abt 1863 - Sweden ' â€¢ 1860 United States Residence: 1920 - Denver, Denver, Colorado Federal Census Source: Census - 1920 United States Federal Census â€¢ Iowa State Census 1885 *** Frank L Peterson Birth: abt 1863 - Michigan Resi Jenee : 1920 - Precinct 18, Otero, Colorado * Pennsylvania 1910 Source: Census - 1920 United States FederÂ·al Genius Miracode Index See more... *** LE_ Peterson Birth: abt 1866 - Denmark Residence: 1920 - Penrose, Fremont, Colorado Source: Census - 1920 United States Federal Census |--'4 Did You Know? 1 1829 Peterson soldiers *** Linnea Peterson Birth: Iowa served in the Union Residence: Pitkin army in the Civil War. Source: Census - Colorado State Census, 1Â£85 Click to learn more >> *** P L Peterson Btrth: 1870 - Sweden Residence: 1900 - Anaconda, Teller, Colorado Other: 1889 Source: Census - 1900 United States Federal Census Viewin, Results per page FEE[ http://search.ancestry.com/cgi-bin/sse.dll?gsfn=linneakgsln=Peterson&gsby=1865&gsbc... 08/22/2005 Ancestry.com - 1920 United States Federal Census Page 1 of 3 .. Ancdtry.com Welcome, marshall 1 Log Out I Upgrade 1 Mv A, Discover Your Family Story Home My Ancestry Search Records Family Trees Message Boards Learning Center Sho 1920 United States Federal Census records matching your search for Peterson All Records > Census > 1920 United States Federal Census > Individual View Â« List of Matches Â« Previous Mate Personal Information Census Image What to do ne: Name: Unnea Peterson ..7.-- - 2-15/4 :21 E-mail iniag Age: 55 years 1* Save Person Estimated birth year: abt 1865 ,Â· Â·.T :--7 - Birthplace: Sweden 9 Comments e Race: White ak 4.-1-N:,1 4 - . . : . 1 KE- 1522.-Â£* 1 1 Â£6' View printer Home in 1920: Aspen, Pitkin, Colorado Home owned: \Â«w Image Lâ€¢ vievy_original image Sex: View Image Tip: View blank 1920 census Marital status: View Image form (PDF 101<) Year of immigration: View Dna_ge Able to read & write: View Image Roll: T625_169 Page: 12A ED: 137 Image: 666 Â« Previous Mate | Refine your search of the 1920 United States Federal Census Search lips le Ranked Search Exact Search Enter as much information as possible for best results: ~Peterson First Name Last Name Residence ~Colorado Z] ]pitkin ~aspen State County Township v Show Advanced Search Options ,i Search ** Unlocking Secrets in the 1920 U.S. Census ~ This database will detail those persons (heads of household) enumerated in the 1920 Unitec L_ , Federal Census, the Fourteenth Census of the United States. In addition, the names of thos .1-1.- households listed on the population schedule are linked to the actual images of the 1920 Fe Census, copied from the National Archives and Records Administration microfilm, T625,2,0 The 1920 indexes have been completed for all fifty US states including American Somoa, G http://search.ancestry.com/cgi-bin/sse.dll?indiv=1&gsfn==&gstn=Peterson&f13=Colorado... 08/22/2005 itt. fendus' Ancestry.com - 1920 United States Federal Census Page 1 of 3 .. Ancewry.com Welcome, marshall I Log Out I Upgrade I My At - Discover Your Family Story Home My Ancestry Search Records Family Trees Message Boards Learning Center Sho 1920 United States Federal Census records matching your search for Peterson All Records > Census > 1920 United States Federal Census > Individual View Â« List_of_Matches Â« Previous Matc Personal Information Census Image What to done Name: John E Peterson :~1 E-mail imag Age: 52 years Estimated birth year: abt 1868 [* Save Person Birthplace: Norway L. .Â· -4-Â»- -4--94 R *1 Comments 2 .--- Race: White L~LU. :.u*LU-Uuâ€¢&*Â£ Home in 1920: Aspen, Pitkin, Colorado _ al View printer Home owned: View Image - View original image Sex: View Image Tip: View blank 1920 census Marital status: View Image form (PDF 1OK) Year of immigration: View Image Able to read & write: View Image Roll: T625_169 Page: 5A ED: 137 Image: 652 Â« Previous Matc Refine your search of the 1920 United States Federal Census Search Tips (~ Ranked Search Exact Search Enter as much information as possible for best results: ~Peterson First Name Last Name Residence ~Colorado -11 ~pitkin laspen State County Township v Show Advanced Search Options : - Search ~] Unlocking Secrets in the 1920 U.S. Census his database will detail those persons (heads of household) enumerated in the 1920 Unitec ederal Census, the Fourteenth Census of the United States. In addition, the names of thos i,ouseholds listed on the population schedule are linked to the actual images of the 1920 Fe Census, copied from the National Archives and Records Administration microfilm, T625,2,0 The 1920 indexes have been completed for all fifty US states including American Somoa, Gi http.//search.ancestry.com/cgi-bin/sse.dll?indiv==1&gsfu=&gsln=Peterson&:f13=Colorado.. 08/22/2005 19. Ancestry.com - 1920 United States Federal Census Page 1 of 1 .. Search Results Provided By l'he No. 1 Source for Family History OnlineAn*com August 22,2005 Database: 1920 United States Federal Census 10:25 AM Match Name Home In 1920 Estimated Birthplace Race Quality (City,County,State) Birth Year I ** Peterson, Jennie M Aspen, Pitkin, Colorado abt 1876 Sweden White ** Peters--nt Jolln A Aspen, Pitkin, Colorado abt 1873 Sweden White ** Peterson, John E Aspen, Pitkin, Colorado abt 1868 Norway White ** Peterson, Linnea Aspen, Pitkin, Colorado abt 1865 Sweden White ** Peterson, Oscar Aspen, Pitkin, Colorado abt 1884 Sweden White ** Peterson, Undine Aspen, Pitkin, Colorado abt 1875 Sweden White ** Peters-9-n Denver, Denver, Colorado Not Stated White ** Peterion Denver, Denver, Colorado Not Stated White Pueblo, Pueblo, Colorado Peterson abt 1890 Not Stated White ** Peterson, A Denver, Denver, Colorado Not Stated White Source Information: Ancestry.com. 1920 United States Federal Census. [database on-line] Provo, UT: Ancestry.com, 2001-. Indexed by Ancestry.com from microfilmed schedules of the 1920 U.S. Federal Decennial Census.1920 United States Federal Census. [database online] Prove, UT: Ancestry.com, 2001. Data imaged from National Archives and Records Administration. 1920 Federal Population Census. T625,2,076 rolls. Washington, D.C.: National Archives and Records Administration. << Return to Results Screen http://search.ancestry.com/cgi-bin/sse.dll?gsfn=&gsln==Peterson&f 13=Colorado&f4=pitki... 08/22/2005 DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE-UREAU OF THE CENSUS . Im, Int -~ D.TRICT No.-_dE_ 1 Ste, Na ~J- Colom (741 FOURTEENTH CENSUS OF THE UNITED STATES 1920--POPULATIO42 le ~anâ€ži.Al= DImacT No_.6*-_1-__/ 2,.A TO-StÂ«/ 011 0â„¢1* 01,151011 OF , uÂ·Â·-Â·Â· - Al'.,+ + ... '. i . ._, Flâ€¢t or â€¢co~oum puct __.__,~P ,/ 6,1 f,Â·. NAME OF INS=UnON ' 6/79 9 1- - . . 1920 - -1.4â€¢mk -... + ENUMERATO~ ENtIOATED BÂ¥ ME ON RE ..273. ~ De OF L --a ..= ....... - ..1- .1,=..â€ž4 -rlilli min.rv â€¢i, I.. T.,urt . 1 11 . . 1 --i- ..r,In- 1'~11 ji i 1~ iii ~1 D ~!~is il li -- -- it leae*~*8 1 ; 11 1!11 1 4 - - .--- ...- .-- ...... ...... -7-1.-'71 7 ---7 -- ---0-- 77 71. â€ž .,â€ž. 6 0. . -1- - - I n . M . W ... 1 1 4 - __..â€ž - .i'Â·Â·.,â€¢/ --2lr.- ~ F.~ 2('_b/ . 1 - .,1 1 '. f- , . .AL,l - -- + 2 6. 7. 919- 0,+ h 79 - 4*.-. **4-:' -0 6' 444.0,*--- .i,44...~. 0.. K 4 *'I 3.4 7 4 l + _41,..._ ' cÂ·4. 3 .-' LE.Q.Lf.OAe,/m 0 :i . . tâ€¢ WH, 4 â€¢' UL....Â£9., ..1-1. -- F -4--~Â·.â€¢.-Â·. .JaaÂ·'--,--Â· --- Â· -~U ~576----- '.'- ...iâ€¢'> - , It A -- -' I . :or 1.3 4 4 V L - - :, -'ir :44 1. 9.3 - â€ž fro . i |4.41- fk.,r " 1 L - 64*MA - 194 " â‚¬4/ 4 - . 4. 2 ':2,1-'.4 -- - 6 -- _ 3, -424â€¢--- - -1.6 1 1. .1 -fl.1 1- 7- Ij.:"'At. h-., .....0 /'.$....6.. â€¢. ';G k . 19 - -=03%11 - Ed.f- f. :.t Y ...14.. , ... .J- . 32,1.7 +CS,U...Â·i> -......_-* ~-LUU_........._----- .- --I. ~L-- .* A .0 W â€¢ '. 1 P.4- '..lr ' -----. . -I AL.. M - 1 -7-- 1...A Ih ./ 7. ./ . . I. ~ -I- - ..... . , 1 . . . r I. ..... f - - . Â· 1.6.-_'_ ~ 27 8-0, F L.JZM. I.fALÂ·.44 -164 ' n'Cy,th_... - - A.3,--16,_b.r . ..~..,Jut.:Et _- --b/'6~4'~lf -.- el-UL.0 .. 1,% a 4 *43:'1'.2. al:.14 4 6 3' 2 -k 1. 4. 4 .. .. -1. 1 :'....., i47ZnJ-- â‚¬ 7- Ct Z z. . i _ . __mr-z- 262. . - ..,4 - _- __i . 4..,- t. 1 1 1 fjlp,r ,â€¢ ...0,~~,4.turAM.- 16., Â·.-c .. 2 21"" 222.6/4/ -4 7- -_CÂ»- . 4-, 4 -44"i'--_ _ â€ž'1.4-2 .- -r-U- + 4 4- 1.... u .2 A ,Â· *r.' U... U,1/6 .0 9 --=r-==-.24,u#li-__-1,Â£--- li M-4â€¢'.4 + _ 1. 11.41 24 ./ .r ..â€¢.-4. .,4 -Ul 1 . 1 21-1--42. . L '41.â€¢ I t. .--. 4, 17" A, ":241.4.2412* 1.--'' 8-4<41-,ke 4_- , 0 0 I. IR ... 1 p.:.1 1: Â£;.6.4.- aU~....,,_LLL=0 4.6Â£,1Â· 64'ix-- . -%4* 37.1 1 14 64 I..Â·,......3 - ~_..uIA.L---L& - e/34/ t.44.1- t. â€¢/76 7,% , u 14*rÂ·,a. JU.4.. 1 0 - -- 44,-40 â€¢ -4 , .... u - - 1,-: D.6 1 c ./4-4 ' 0 4, i,b 1 *a '6.3 lA 1 1 ' 4 (1.- 4----1 6 - . . n . , I. " I. . 1 2Â£14,,2=:,10,Lw -6-' -3-7-1&12.281/-1.- ... A>--Lâ‚¬ , L , '11Â¥UUU:123: r .3 0664Â·,0% 1 <9 94 6 0 (o v-~u?Â©7 R.f-(rfluj 1 743 Â¢2,A 7 0 ve eled-~ (3> 4/ L ct- _zih.k FOURTEENTH CENSUS OF THE UNRED STATES: 1820IPOPULAT-104 45 4.-,u.no. rÂ».....AUL-1 -_ /2, A ,~,â€ž.,sets O.â„¢CT NO-~--i *câ€ž= /7-I ~ . Câ€ž P.,4- 4 'tiur cm f 41&9 1/0/ 00 1,6,1,0,//4 Er/AIATED ly Co, Di .2 04Â¥ O, C ... = . 34.,AL. ./. -U"- - I.-= "---, *.-* .....â€ž 4/.--9.1 6 11 1-1 U 0 1 1 pi i -- 23.= 11!1 i 'li '11 4 kit,i D 11 -=" -- 1. - - ----- 1 12Â£/ 1//21,2 I - . Â» t. i ,a.a:v#j.L' 2' i --- . , J i -i 44'' 9 1. ..h. .... .... . ' 1% d + â€¢1-6,- Â· t . 4.4. e.,â€¢,6... 0-Iw.I:: ---i--4 :-~,Id- I.-~-4-- .SLI J.*,I~Li p~ . 1 - - 'L - .06â€¢ - .I' 42 4 +W - " 9- 34 4...4- ...6~., _ ...- 341+6 . *,4.-- 0...1,Â£;, I.0 t. .... 6.. ".....) ..,./ -'. -....... I,i I â€¢~ 41-Â·I -2, b-Â·. 1- I..'pr . 7_2..A - - I .1.. - 'I â€¢ â€¢ â€¢LO-. M.4 0 - H.-24 At,- -- r ,11-4 9.-I.... *. 7 â€¢Â·-t_-2 dz tÂ·. u --= -- .9.... .....7 -6..... 1â€¢ 1 ..... ...... .....,- 14, V- - 6.-'*-... 1 0 0112 . .. . 1- . 1.- I . r ' t: 27 .--- 'A, 4 ' ..4 ..04.-1.- . I ?.42: Lj. #- + ./- ....... ...- . 9.--- .....1. ./rr - $' 3 : ./ I --- I I. , .. 4 ... . ...... -r .4 4- 5 .Â· 7 r,21 A 3 â€¢ =21Â·X *- ., -â€¢â€¢-4 Gr '22+G - . . ---- ----6 . , C .â€¢ .â€¢ â€¢.~~ j Â£Â·.Â·4~8. 5 4 6.-,Z..1,.~..im-Jâ€¢- 6 E ...r-4 1... . 4 4, - 1, - -2- 12'2 ,22 A " : G -â€¢t-. - i...._ _ __ . --p -- W . .2 y.7.- <Â·Â·,- 22.-- .t -I- .&-7 44 :244 ,.- u ~Â·. :21.161'~I-- ..1.-/1. *._1-__-Cd.1â€¢64'k #.p-Â£61 -..*pt#---L#L-F:'4~. ' A bBâ€¢ _ -'. i,-es - ..t.1 --- --4- A-*.. '9 ~k- */'Â£/0/:_ * /". . f f.,17 3 lit-. 5.*.-* . ..U.. . " ..4., --,.- . : 9 --35411 -02 0 '1 -p.& U-I_ft:?;_41 -___42 7 - .I-,>*-lzz Il Â· f J. >44 4 - Â·4,_ _-- AA\0 1 3 L/ ' -L_ 0 09â‚¬ 9-3 Pry,1449,38.2.- M=:= i ;. 3...â€ž.- r; 111. i,rk.2 .. 3- E -2 7 f .' 61 12_..512.,t.'%â€¢i'UÂ£,231 0 .% . 6 --7 -*in=-- 419+57.tri&/116:Ji 5 /<6"/I/.-Al/01/Li ALL:'. h,:UZZL.LeÂ£ AL,Al,. . . ,-/4..<_ " 4 /,1-i Ir --.=--i- I. *(21: s n .. L 9 3-0 0 anÂ»>4 -. 7Â£â€¢ :.'J 12 Â£At...4.*c. a/.*0..i'n 0 , I A- -0 -4-* - 0 4 7/ t 1, IL - ...;..-- ........... I. 11.1. L GÂ« 43 70 1 w 21 cu,Â« .. MEMORANDUM TO: Aspen Historic Preservation Commission JAA THRU: Joyce Allgaier, Deputy Community Development Director FROM: Amy Guthrie. Historic Preservation Officer RE: 701 W. Main Street, On-Site Relocation and Setback Variances- Public Hearing DATE: February 9,2005 SUMMARY: The subject property is listed on the Aspen Inventory of Historic Landmark Sites and Structures and contains two buildings, a cabin and a shed along the alley. Neither building exists on the 1904 Sanborne map. The year of construction on record with the Assessor' s office is 1935. 11PC has granted approval for the demolition of the alley structure, and approval to move the cabin towards the northeast corner of the site. HPC has recommended that City Council approve a Historic Landmark Lot Split which creates a western lot of 2,765 square feet, and an eastern lot of 3,000 square feet. Final review of the Lot Split is pending before Council. Since HPC's last discussion, the property has been sold. The new owner would like to adjust the position of the relocated cabin and to receive approval for setback variances. Following that determination. the owner would like to seek a few minutes of board feedback about plans for new construction on the property, and a possible adjustment of the lot split line. At this point they are focused on beginning construction on the cabin as soon as possible. Please note that the application includes a request to demolish the rear portion of the historic cabin, which has been taken off of the table. Staff recommends that HPC grant front yard and sideyard setback variances for the historic cabin as part of its on-site relocation. APPLICANT: Marshall and Susan Olsen, owners. PARCEL ID: 2735-124-46-004. ADDRESS: 701 W. Main Street, Lots H and I, less the west 2.35 feet of Lot H. Block 19, City and Townsite of Aspen. Colorado. ZONING: O. Office. 1 .. ON-SITE RELOCATION The intent of the Historic Preservation ordinance is to preserve designated historic buildings in their original locations as much of their significance is embodied in their setting and physical relationship to their surroundings as well as their association with events and people with ties to particular site. However. it is recognized that occasionally the relocation of a building may be appropriate as it provides an alternative to demolition or because it only has a limited impact on the attributes that make it significant. 26.415.090.C Standards for the Relocation of Designated Properties Relocation for a building, structure or object will be approved if it is determined that it meets any one of the following standards: 1. It is considered a non-contributing element of a historic district and its relocation will not affect the character of the historic district; gl: 2. It does not contribute to the overall character of the historic district or parcel on which it is located and its relocation will not have an adverse impact on the historic district or property; gr 3. The owner has obtained a Certificate of Economic Hardship; 21: 4. The relocation activity is demonstrated to be an acceptable preservation method given the character and integrity of the building, structure or object and its move will not adversely affect the integrity of the historic district in which it was originally located or diminish the historic, architectural or aesthetic relationships of adjacent designated properties; and Additionally, for approval to relocate all of the following criteria must be met: 1. It has been determined that the building, structure or object is capable of withstanding the physical impacts of relocation; and 2. An appropriate receiving site has been identified; and 3. An acceptable plan has been submitted providing for the safe relocation, repair and preservation of the building, structure or object including the provision of the necessary financial security. Staff Response: HPC has already endorsed the concept of relocating this cabin to the northeast corner of the site. This was found to be more appropriate than other possible locations because it maintains the building's public exposure on two sides, and positions it prominently on the lot. In addition, the northeast corner is thought to be the best location to facilitate rehabilitation of the building for commercial use. ideally as a detached structure. Based on the guideline below, staff continues to support the on-site relocation of this building. The standard assurances that the building will be moved safely are included as conditions of approval. 9.1 Proposals to relocate a building will be considered on a case-by-ease basis. u In general, relocation has less of an impact on individual landmark structures than those in a historic district. ci It must be demonstrated that relocation is the best preservation alternative. i Rehabilitation of a historic building must occur as a first phase of any improvements. 2 .. ci A relocated building must be carefully rehabilitated to retain original architectural details and materials. u Before a building is moved. a plan must be in place to secure the structure and provide a new foundation. utilities. and to restore the house. u The design of a new structure on the site should be in accordance with the guidelines for new construction. J In general. moving a building to an entirely different site or neighborhood is not approved. SETBACK VARIANCES The approved location for the cabin is represented in "Exhibit C." The owner at that time proposed to set the cabin 15 feet back from Main Street (10 feet is required). and 7 feet from the east sideyard (6.33 feet is required for a corner lot). No variances were needed. The new owner intends to rehabilitate the cabin for use as an art studio, and to construct a detached residential unit behind it, along the alley. Front and sideyard setback variances are proposed. The criteria for granting setback variances, per Section 26.415.110.C of the Municipal Code are as follows: HPC must make a finding that the setback variance: a. Is similar to the pattern, features and character of the historic property or district; and/or b. Enhances or mitigates an adverse impact to the historic significance or architectural character of the historic property, an adjoining designated historic property or historic district. Staff Finding: Staff has provided a GIS map of the immediate neighborhood to indicate the surrounding setback patterns. Although there is some variety. most buildings at this end of Main Street have a meaningfully sized front yard as a important feature, with side yards and rear yards appearing to be of somewhat less significance in terms of creating a sense of open space. The guidelines below all discuss the importance of respecting the Main Street front yard setback patterns when relocating a historic building. 9.4 Site the structure in a position similar to its historic orientation. u It should face the same direction and have a relatively similar setback. u It may not, for example, be moved to the rear of the parcel to accommodate a new building in front of it. 12.1 Respect historic settlement patterns. (Main Street Historic District) o Site a new building in a way similar to historic buildings in the area. This includes consideration of building setbacks. entry orientation and open space. 3 .. 12.8 Provide a front yard that is similar in depth to its neighbors. 12.9 Orient a new building in a manner that is similar to the orientation of buildings during the mining era, with the primary entrance facing the street. The building should be oriented parallel to the lot lines, maintaining the traditional grid pattern of the block. o A structure should appear to have one primary entrance that faces the street. The entrance to the structure should be at an appropriate residential scale and visible from the street. Currently, the cabin has a deep setback of 24 feet, as it is nearly centered in the lot. The Victorian to the west is approximately 12-13' from the front lot line. Staff recommends that. at the least. the building be allowed to sit on the front yard setback line. Even with the cabin this far forward on the lot, the board will need to consider allowing a waiver of the rear yard setback in order to afford some space between the 42' long historic structure and the proposed alley structure. The rear yard setback required for the alley house is 15'.but it is proposed to be more like 5 ' on the attached worksession plans, which indicate 18 feet remaining between the historic cabin and new construction. Staff recommends that LIPC grant a variance to allow the front yard setback for the cabin to be in the 8 -10' range in order to be compatible with the surroundiiig neighborhood. while providing some flexibility for the redevelopment of the site. A five foot front yard setback as requested may not be enough, but in general the project is going in a positive direction since a significant portion of the new corner lot is being left undeveloped or developed only with a one story structure, which will be a benefit to the mix of building scales on Main Street. With regard to the sideyard setback. the applicant is showing 10 feet on the west sideyard, and 1 -6" on the east, or street-facing sideyard. A larger west sideyard may be appropriate to provide some usable outdoor space around the building. and also to buffer it from the new, taller house that will be built next door. There is also some benefit to keeping the cabin away from the large tree on the northwest corner of the site. Staff is somewhat concerned with this very minimal east sideyard setback. however the adjacent right-of-way will give the impression of more open space around the cabin. DECISION MAKING OPTIONS: The HPC may: â€¢ approve the application, â€¢ approve the application with conditions, â€¢ disapprove the application, or â€¢ continue the application to a date certain to obtain additional information necessary to make a decision to approve or deny. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that HPC work with the applicant to determine an appropriate front yard setback of the cabin, which may be as little as 5' based on the public notice that has been issued. Staff recommends that HPC approve a setback of as little as 1'6" on the east sideyard. As part of the approval to relocate the cabin. the following conditions should be adopted. 4 .. 1. On-site relocation of the cabin to Lot A (the corner lot) is approved. Relocation of this building onto a new foundation, and rehabilitation of the structure must be the first action that is taken to redevelop this property. It will not be acceptable to move the building and "mothball" it, in favor of undertaking construction on the vacant parcel. 2. A structural report demonstrating that the buildings can be moved and/or information about how the houses will be stabilized from the housemover must be submitted with the building permit application. 3. A bond or letter of credit in the amount of $30,000 to insure the safe relocation of the structures must be submitted with the building permit application. 4. A relocation plan detailing how and where the buildings will be stored and protected during construction must be submitted with the building permit application. Exhibits: A. Relevant Design Guidelines B. GIS map of neighborhood C. Previously approved cabin location D. Application E. Worksession drawings 5 .. "Exhibit A: Relevant Design Guidelines for 701 W. Main Street Relocation and Variances" 9.1 Proposals to relocate a building will be considered on a case-by-case basis. m In general, relocation has less of an impact on individual landmark structures than those in a historic district. o It must be demonstrated that relocation is the best preservation alternative. o Rehabilitation of a historic building must occur as a first phase o f any improvements. u A relocated building must be carefully rehabilitated to retain original architectural details and materials. u Before a building is moved, a plan must be in place to secure the structure and provide a new foundation, utilities, and to restore the house. u The design of a new structure on the site should be in accordance with the guidelines for new construction. u In general. moving a building to an entirely different site or neighborhood is not approved. 9.2 Moving an existing building that contributes to the character of a historic district should be avoided. u The significance of a building and the character of its setting will be considered. u In general, relocating a contributing building in a district requires greater sensitivity than moving an individually-listed structure because the relative positioning of it reflects patterns of development. including spacing of side yards and front setbacks. that relate to other historic structures in the area. 9.3 If relocation is deemed appropriate by the HPC, a structure must remain within the boundaries of its historic parcel. 3 If a historic building straddles two lots, then it may be shifted to sit entirely on one of the lots. Both lots shall remain landmarked properties. 9.4 Site the structure in a position similar to its historic orientation. u It should face the same direction and have a relatively similar setback. u It may not, for example, be moved to the rear of the parcel to accommodate a new building in front of it. 12.1 Respect historic settlement patterns. (Main Street Historic District) u Site a new building in a way similar to historic buildings in the area. This includes consideration of building setbacks, entry orientation and open space. 12.8 Provide a front yard that is similar in depth to its neighbors. (MSHD ,See the guidelines chapter- Lot and Xii'eetscape Features. 12.9 Orient a new building in a manner that is similar to the orientation of buildings during the mining era, with the primary entrance facing the street. (MSHD) u The building should be oriented parallel to the lot lines, maintaining the traditional grid pattern of the block. u A structure should appear to have one primary entrance that faces the street. The entrance to the structure should be at an appropriate residential scale and visible from the street. 6 .. -1 3 ATTACHMENT 7 AFFIDAVIT OF PUBLIC NOTICE REQUIRED BY SECTION 26.304.060 (E), ASPEN LAND USE CODE ADDRESS OF PROPERTY: 701 9-)# 3,10 ,<0 61 , Aspen, CO SCHEDULED PUBLIC HEARING DATE: -1-j 9 ~09 , 200_ 1 -t STATE OF COLORADO ) ) SS. County of Pitkin ) I, Â«Jb U/( lâ‚¬ 15 1 6- C i-.-f (name. please print) being or representing an Applicant to the City of Aspen, Colorado, hereby personally certify that I have complied with the public notice requirements of Section 26.304.060 (E) of the Aspen Land Use Code in the following manner: -A~ Publication of notice: BY the publication in the legal notice section of an official paper or a paper of general circulation in the City of Aspen at least fifteen (15) days prior to the public hearing. A copy'of the publication is attached hereto. Posting of notice: By posting of notice, which form was obtained from the Community Development Department, which was made of suitable. waterproo f materials, which was not less than twenty-two (22) inches wide and twenty-six (26) inches high, and which was composed of letters not less than one inch in height. Said notice was posted at least fifteen (15) days prior to the public hearing and was continuously visible from the _ day of , 200 , to and including the date and time of the public hearing. A photograph of the posted notice (sign) is attached hereto. Mailing of notice. By the mailing of a notice obtained from the Community Development Department, which contains the information described in S,:ction 26.304.060(E)(2) of the Aspen Land Use Code. At least fifteen (15) days prior to the public hearing, notice was hand delivered or mailed by first class postage . prepaid U.S. mail to any federal agency, state. county, municipal government, school, service district or other governmental or quasi-governmental agency that owns property within three hundred (300) feet ofthe property subject to the development application. The names and addresses ofproperty owners shall be those on the current tax records of Pitkin County as they appeared no more than sixty (60) days prior to the date of the public hearing. A copy of the owners and governmental agencies so n.oticed is attached hereto. (continued on next page) .. Rezoning or text amendment. Whenever the official zoning district map is in any way to be changed or amended incidental to or as part of a general revision o f this Title, or whenever the text of this Title is to be amended, whether such revision be made by repeal of this Title and enactment of a new land use regulation. or otherwise. the requirement of an accurate survey map or other sufficient legal description of, and the notice to and listing o f names and addresses o f owners o f real property in the area o f the proposed change shall be waived. However, the proposed zoning map has been available for public inspection in the planning agency during all business hours for fifteen (15) days prior to the public hearing on such amendments. 44/.6/1Â«F-/4-0.-2349 Ut Signature The foregoing "Affidavit of Notice" was acknowledged before me t]19Â·Â·21 day of - , 2005 by UNÂ»-CS 61 -yÂ«* PUBLIC NOTICE RE: 701 W. MAIN STREET - DEMOUTION, RELOCATION AND VARIA,.CES NOTICE lS HEREBY GIVEN that a public hearing WITNESS MY HAND AND OFFICIAL SEAL will be held on Wednesday. February 9,2005 at a meeting to begin at 5:00 p.m. before the Aspen Historic Preservation Â°ommission, City Council Chambers, City Hall, 130 S. Galena St.. Aspen. to My commission eopires: 9/3211 -Â», consider an application submitted by Marshall and Susan Olsen. affecting the property located at 701 W. Main Street. Lots H and 1, less the west- St__31 erly 2.35 feet o[ Lot H. Block 19. City and Town- site of Aspen. HPC is asked to grant approval to Notary Public - "Efffi,Y iPUB<// demolish a portion of the existing cabin and to dr 4, U O / relocate it on the site. The application Inclu(les the following variance requests for the relocated g k i .. cabin: an east side yard setback variance of up to 5 feet and a front yard setback variance of up to 5 61 : _ E S J Il,Â·%,H Â·: /0 For further information, r intact Amy Guthrie at 10\Ok ....r the City of Aspen Community Development De 0/<TcS .: O partment. 130 S. Galena St. Aspen, CO, (970) 429- 2758. amyg@ci.aspen.co.us. ~1 24= C O s/Jeffrey Halferty Chair, Aspen Historic Preservation Commission ATTACHMENTS: Published in The Aspen Times on January 23, 2005,(2320) - COPY OF THE PUBLICATION PHOTOGRAPH OF THE POSTED NOTICE (SIGN) LIST OF THE OWNERS AND GOVERNMENTAL AGENCIES NOTICED BY MAIL t, .. r.an==/ i l.5 4.26Â·j I -- Wod i /1-C=M - ~ 1 .0,-re r ul u ~'lPo ~_~_~j~ l*~* 000 CD -d 06 0 0- 0 0 cP d> 1<3-7 021[90 D OCul *09 . Li: I - Unrooo 0 - C: 0 .... 0 07 1 0 - . 03 UL-3 4 Â¤â‚¬ R -/ 53 ~ 9 're Â£27 1 7// 0 -16**64 0 701 West Main Street Aspen, Colorado =hil--In 1 't f Cul -7 & I * t..'r..b, ~ L ' 2 *%/ 4 @ f Â·14 2- ? , t'.4 41.-4 .re- 9.7 1 7-. 1 h t. 9 49 : t: , ' I.,9 1 YL ./ * j ./ 4 J 444/2... 1- 4 .4 4 41,~ 4. .%; 4 $9 +AME~ - 71//A + 5,4 dv:/0-47. .l.bjh rlÂ®,1 - /. 1.nzrq 1, t, S I. 0 1 1, I I 441-,$," ' 3f Â¢./ t i - .f -0 4 . - I /4 + , . 0 .i 4 :,1." 2, ~ - 9/Â¥ 1 i I I .4,Â¥ ... . 0 . 'I . A 'i. .r i , 4 i. r/4.f'j y . 4, f 1 4, 4-,4 ; / . 4.20 1.41 62'.. 1. , 14 * . ?. f. .t ~.4,7 Er-* . Adillill"00",0/ I r I 9 A , , r ./4 - :AL,tre . h , L. . I. r..4 I. --- 4 4 3\ \ 1 ji f , . 1 0. 11 1' -1/MELE- 4 4 -- 1. p â€¢Ft ' A 45 . - 4 9*r r~~,~ AFFIDAVIT OF PUBLIC NOTICE ~~ " C- REQUIRED BY SECTION 26.304.060 (E), ASPEN LAND USE CO10 7"41ilg.- 1 ADDRESS OF PROPERTY: 9 0 / M 2 * 9 reef- , Aspen, CO SCHEDULED PUBLIC HEARING DATES-~~ 9, , 200..1 STATE OF COLORADO ) ) SS. Counti of Pitkin ) 1 ~ 8-111 ~l / 4/, 0,(3Â« F\ (nanie. please print) being or representing an Applicant to the City of Aspen, Colorado. hereby personally certify that I have complied with the public notice requirements of Section 26.304.060 (E) of the Aspen Land Use Code in the following manner: Publication ofnotice: Bl the publication in the legal notice section of an official paper or a paper of general circulation in the City of Aspen at least fifteen (15) days prior to the. public hearing. A copy of the publication is attached hereto. 1 Posting of notice: By posting of notice. which form was obtained from the Community Development Department. which was made of suitable~ waterproof materials, which was not less than twenty-two (22) inches wide and twenty-six (26) inches high, and which was composed of letters not less than one inch in height. Said notice was posted in a conspicuous place on the subject properly at least fifteen (15) days prior to the public hearino and was continuously visible from the day of . 2005~ to and including the date and time of the public hearing. A photograph of the posted notice (sign) is attached hereto. \,~ Mailing of notice. By the mailing of a notice obtained from the Community - Development Department. which contains the information described in Section 26.304.060(E)(2) of the Aspen Land Use Code. At least-fifteen (15) days prior to the public hearing. notice was hand delivered or mailed by first class. postage prepaid U.S. mail to all owners of property within three hundred (300) feet of the property subject to the development application, and. at least fifteen (15) days prior to the public hearing. notice was hand delivered or mailed by first class postage prepaid U.S. mail to any federal agency. state, county, municipal government, school, service district or other governmental or quasi-governmental agency that owiis property within three hundred (300) feet of the property subject to the development application. The names and addresses of property owners shall be those on the current tax records of Pitkin County as they appeared no more than sixty (60) days prior to the date of the public hearing. A copy off he 011'/741 3 and governmental agencies so noticed is attached hereto. (continued on next page) 0 0 Rezoning or text amendment. Whenever the official zoning district map is in any way to be changed or amended incidental to or as part of a general revision of this Title. or whenever the text of this Title is to be amended. whether such revision be made by repeal of this Title and enactment of a new land use regulation. or otherwise. the requirement of an accurate survey map or other sufficient legal description of. and the notice to and listing of names and addresses of owners of real property in the area of the proposed change shall be waived. However. the proposed zoning map has been available for public inspection iii the planning agency during all~*Â§Tl*is hours for fifteen (15) days prior to the public hearing &2 uch amendiptnt/n \1 i / 11 r U (1 -,>-mer!'84ure j The foregoing "Affidavit of Notice was acknowledged before me this / 9 day of d fi Bj VA R y , 2005. by WITNESS MY HAND AND OFFICIAL SEAL My commission expires: /- 29 Â· 7 007 A K 1 W (c-9 Notary Public / P.--/....i-W-iun-- TODD A. LAY- NOTARY PUBUC State of Colorado My ComrriGi-36-*Pii@-s-TEE# ATTACHMENTS: COPY OF THE PUBLICATION PHOTOGRAPH OF THE POSTED NOTICE (SIGN) LIST OF THE OWNERS AND GOVERNMENTAL AGENCIES NOTICED BY MAIL .I MAIN STREET ~ RACK OF Ct IRA 0 -1 0 7), DITCH BASIS OF BEARINGS S 75009'11"E 270.02' .1 --42 15170 . --t.----i --I 57.65' -------- 7 -9 9 1 1 ' 5-'-7 12/16" 0 1 , 1 EXST'e k ~n<-TREE f~124 k~~LlilÂ®f''t-lypyfi c\4 .411-1-176- 1-"PIT' T.. '1 mtt-*9944*4 -oâ€ž: 11 1 - \ 1 1 r------- 1 +L , A. i 1-1-24-4 1 1,6.2 r eM-,ilf.-e ' 74*dr,-1 I I th-2=i~~26*his 1 ~NORTH POE.TION N~ri -,LEE'i~ 1 0 ~rO Â·BE RELOOATE~.0,e'i~~~Â·~,F$~itÂ»Â¥0*fr=-1.. 4 1 mim &, ' tt@t. -2 ! 2 Li=' -. - 1 1 0 Â¢ CD I - I U50Â»1,44-kili I 3~'bi ~'2,8-flp .Â· li,-,q# 1 r. Z .1 j 1 293512 11"F#,94 - Â·F:j>IL,-431 g:RY 171181734,-4.17-1-Ill -t-1 I-'gm 1 41Â· (2 4 i HOUSE *It-11*94,11-#PI-J"d CD 1 1*10 70\ IX-12 1 :' ...F- 1 --121Â¥l ~11-1 L,1-,0.1 C IL' 11 ; * 1 CN ' 1 IMIPPLE fORTFON 4--111 F -1. r= 1 0 ITO BE R~LOS,ATED ~63~~~r<â‚¬',2'hltÂ©,-4;# 1 t.~420*LE.!211,1.-4~141 lij~ 1 i ~*4-1.94â‚¬ill~110'#2* 1 1 1 441>1*!.16+1414 1 1 1 1 1 I SOUTH PgRTION --t-3 i 0 I r 1 L--- -1 16.2 1 j 20.5 - H ,F 1 - 0 1 1 FENCE ~ 1 - -TO BE REMOVED E FENCE | TO DE REMOVED - 1 , - r Z \1 Ell 50'-O" 27-7 0/le" EXIST'6 TREE | TO BE REMOVED E--14-0----3 1 1 1 1 -n 1 | WALK | 4 1 -1 , 24.0 21 1 1% L- SHED -1 SHED |- IN TOBI DEMOLISHED -- ,1 BLOCK 1\9 1 38.7 - 65_ Cit# Of Aspen -34 +3 35710 .ALLEY S 75009'11"E 57 65' - 1 1 / 1 HISTORIC MIXED USE DEMO. -/ t JAKE VIDKERY ARCHITECTS T AND RELOCATION PLAN - A 12-20-04 70 1 JAIEST MAIN ST. 45-EN COLORADO , 003 EAST MAIN ST 1 D siteDM-RLOD-A!20804_fv ASPEN CO Slell (114 925-3660 1333 03 --i- 0 3-1VDS ,00 OOL Mâ€ž6+,090+ 1 S 6th-, STREET , 9 E 100.00' 6th Street Bitch Relocated Existing ' b ~ Structure 100.00' I i -----I--I--- il 51-Oil, hi , . 1 1 1 CD I I 1 1 1 f~ 42.2' 1 col - --% --~--~ ----------------- 1>h I hi 1 CD lf) % 21 1 0 1 3! 1 1 1 1 \ 1 1 Cabin Relocation Site Plan 1 1 1 1 1 70 1 West Main Street NagleHartray[)ankerKaganMcKayPenney Aspen, Colorado ARCHITECTS, LTD. 30 West Monroe Slreet Nor.1 1-+-1- 14 JANUARY 2005 Chicago, Illinois 60603 Â£/ T, 3 1 2.425. 1000 SCALE 1/16" = 19' F. 312.425.1001 IVICin Street .. Susan and Marshall G. Olsen 800 Mill Street P.O. Box 12228 Aspen CO, 81612 925-3628 701 Main Street - Key Issues Application supplement - Written Discription The lot split line has already been agreed to be a line dividing the existing lot into two lots, lot A and lot B, where the line creates a width of lot B of 30 feet and lot A of 27.65 feet. What are the setback rules for lot A. We would like the cottage moved to the front corner of the lot with the side setback on the East side being 1.5 feet and the front setback being 5 feet. A drawing accompanies this description. Since our proposed use of the cottage is to change it into an art center, a gallery at the front and studio space in the rear, it makes sense for the lot to be close to the sidewalk on Main St. Out intention is to build a 2 bedroom apartment at the rear of the lot. Are the setback rules for the front applicable to the rear, where the apartment will be? In addition, what are the setback rules for the West side of the apartment. A drawing accompanies this description. Depending on the setback requirements, we may ask for the lot line to be moved in order to create a narrower lot for the cottage and apartment giving a larger dimension to Lot B in order to accommodate a reasonable size single family home. We would propose either a 32 foot lot or a 34 foot lot, depending on the variations of setbacks on lot A.. Drawings of these proposals accompany this request. 1- i-~7>(1 j / 6 Lty -E .. â‚¬1, l , A 4-1.4. C =_r- -i.144 - -- -33 if fi 1 -1 1 11/ i 1, . '41 if i k /* 2,-I' I ...a 1&91 1 -1 y .!f 1 -,1. af, W j j f + Â·i \â€¢ 4 89 * f 4, 1 1 -di k 'Uvit i I-- i 1 ...,4 .: 1 /g- Â·r--:. , c-, F I <1 1 1 k - i +. . .fit Li 1 - ....Z . + -* 3--04 lu./ -:r 1 1 4*Eâ‚¬ 1 :. rÂ¥ . Â»1-- ? t:~ > i 1 1,1 - UM 4*=E~ 3* i M 41 T===Ee.*==EN, 4. / : -1.-4,-0 I P. Â¥ , 1.- P *.n#% 14 '19 -0 C 9,0 --41. - -- ~ ,~ 4(-5 ~-~li 60:-it kj-â‚¬IJ#*9T C *- L 2 i 27 1 ~.:'f. 41? 1 i /4 .f i 1 . h i ... 117 1 1 1 , f /E- Ill- 9, I 1 Â«97 >U r ..4/ , ** + :.....:I, ' ~ ~TaI . ..1 tv > A . 1 7 -0 -* PUBLIC NOTICE .*W-7-97* . . 79Â¥54 . L. ~ 3: ...2 7 DATE teh. 9, 2005 i- 7-e-,v TIME 5 p. m. PLACE 9,47 LIA It 130 Ch PURPOSE cle wd Vt' D n AE Re. r v + 1 <69<4 6 0 4 rA Cak; 4 \*br iniges 404 91- bach an -Front ana EAd â‚¬ i â‚¬1Â¢29 I. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT; THE CITY OF ASPEN PLANNING DEPARTMENT 130 S GALENA ST, ASPEN CO (970)920Â·5090 ' 7 . * t:Â¥ Falir. 4 . . i , 21}=HU:,4 J , . 14 ..9.1, , ' 41 . ..Uke" i': 121:t, -~i~~.j.j~ Â» , ..1, '41 I . '' i P .2:1,8,~.Adg.,tr 'L.~,~7 t.., D,77 k . .t . 1 ..0*J, .... 1 1 k./2/ '.4 ro~.~,2,7/ I T A 44 + '450 . .2~. 1 Â©B . r: 29 1 3 .1 f.1, .. 7 Â· U.'r"-6 4, A 1 -Â·)*41 ...... --L -7 - 3.-All" . I./*.*Ir.- , . D I . Ii-). 1 4./. -4./' .~4~ m:a,rt*;,â€¢ 4 'i 11* PUBLIC NOTICE ~ -- - 1/9/1./.* -: *M132. DATE f=L9#2QQL .. 1 1.# 7#. ~ 1 ..4. TIME ///4;*PirÂ· Â· '2' v/ f. 5 9. m. -i .... 4 PLACE 04Â®ill,ng-Gak, ~~"*2~51=~ PURPOSE - -L , il__1 , rd Q-, /...4,/..4 rhk.. *f, in,re, fo, 4.thark: I. 4 6-,ret ar,A Kn<1 Â£./rJ,=, I ..f ImE - iMEW,'Em:05#8: - 1. - t - 1.2., , I' 6.... I.~- '4Â¥ f. â€¢ EXHIBIT 0 1 ,5 WEST BLEEKER LLC 715 W MAIN LLC ALLEN DOUGLAS P ~ â‚¬'I )r- (g q , o q ~ O NANCY SPEARS 715 W MAIN ST #101 403 LACET LN O BOX 2630 ASPEN, CO 81611 IL...........-/ ASPEN, CO 81611 3PEN, CO 81612 3PEN/PITKIN COUNTY HOUSING BARBER EDGAR F BERR LLC JTHORITY 611 W MAIN ST PO BOX 9678 IO E MAIN ST #001 ASPEN, CO 81611 ASPEN, CO 81612 SPEN, CO 81611 _ANCHARD NATALIE M 33% BODURTHA SUSAN M BRINKMEYER THOMAS K )0 N 8TH ST 719 W MAIN ST #206 PO BOX 9022 3PEN, CO 81611 ASPEN, CO 81611 ASPEN, CO 81612 CHRISTIAN SCIENCE SOCIETY RYAN SHEILAH JUDITH BULICZ KEITH ASPEN/SNOWMASS INC 0 BOX 976 PO BOX 2826 734 W MAIN ST SPEN, CO 81612 ASPEN, CO 81612 ASPEN, CO 81611 HRISTOPHER MARIDEE CITY OF ASPEN COSCARELLO ROBERT & ELIZABETH 330 E HAYWARD AVE #1 130 S GALENA ST 8435 FRANKLIN AVE HOENIX, AZ 85020-4414 ASPEN, CO 81611 LOS ANGELES, CA 90069-1502 CROCKETT E DAVID TRUSTEE OULTER G LYNNIE DART ELIZABETH RODWELL CROCKETT ANN RAE TRUSTEE O BOX L3 633 W MAIN ST 10898 MORA DR SPEN, CO 81612 ASPEN, CO 81611 LOS ALTOS HILLS, CA 94024 UNSDON S MICHAELE END TERRY FELD ANNE S ORKENHAGEN DAVID A 1700 PACIFIC AVE STE 4100 PO BOX 747 17 W MAIN ST #D DALLAS, TX 75201 ASPEN, CO 81612 SPEN, CO 81611-1619 ISHER DONNA S FRANCIS TIMOTHY P & MARY VIRGINIA FREUND ROYAL 05 W MAIN ST PENTHOUSE B 711 W BLEEKER 51 ROARING FORK DR SPEN, CO 81611 ASPEN, CO 81611 ASPEN, CO 81611 ;AMARRA ANA M & JUAN C GIBSON ASPEN PROPERTIES LLC GOLDSMITH ELLEN 'O BOX 9877 715 W MAIN ST STE #203 719 W MAIN ST #101 *SPEN, CO 81612 ASPEN, CO 81611 ASPEN, CO 81611 HAISFIELD MICHAEL DOUGLAS & LISA ;RUETER PAUL ERICH HAHN ELIZABETH EVANS YERKE '19 W MAIN ST #103 257 MOUNTAIN CT 616 W HOPKINS 4SPEN, CO 81611 BASALT, CO 81621 ASPEN, CO 81611 AMLIN CONNIE E HANLE JEFFREY T HAYES MARY FAMILY PTNSP LTD 19 W MAIN ST #207 126 S 7TH ST PO BOX 497 3PEN, CO 81611 ASPEN, CO 81611 ASPEN, CO 81612 HISPATEL CORP ERRICK DARBY HOOK BRADLEY K & PAMELA D C/O FINSER CORP B KEON M W HOPKINS ST 782C NORTH KALAHEO 550 BILTMORE WY SPEN, CO 80611 KAILUA, HI 96734 CORAL GABLES, FL 33134 UNTINGTON TRUST CO NA TRUSTEE IGLEHART JIM IGLEHART JIM /O COATES REID & WALDRON 20 E HYMAN AVE 610 W HALLAM ST 617 W MAIN ST ASPEN, CO 81611 ASPEN, CO 81611 SPEN, CO 81611 ENKINS JULIE N JEROME OFFICE ASPEN CO LLC JOHNSON STANFORD H 19 W MAIN ST #203 715 W MAIN ST #201 PO BOX 32102 SPEN, CO 81611 ASPEN, CO 81611 TUCSON, AZ 85751 KLEIN DEBBIE ENT MARY SUE 1/2 KNIGHT GLENDA C A COLORADO CORPORATION 28 W HOPKINS AVE . 546 MCSKIMMING RD PO BOX 328 SPEN, CO 81611 SNOWMASS, CO 81654 ASPEN, CO 81611 LARY LANCE R OELLE ALICE KRAHE SHARON PRINCE ANNMARIE O BOX 2871 PO BOX 8615 719 W MAIN ST #301 SPEN, CO 81612 ASPEN, CO 81612 ASPEN, CO 81611 ENIO TED LEVIN WILLIAM A LUU INVESTMENTS LLC :/0 ANN LENIO 1 PENN PLAZA #725 435 E MAIN ST 37 W BLOOMFIELD ASPEN, CO 81611 NEW YORK, NY 10119 tOME, NY 13440 MAEWEST LLC .YLE ALEXANDER T MADSEN MARTHA W ATTN: DOROTHY A SHARP '19 W MAIN ST #204 608 W HOPKINS AVE APT 9 706 WEST MAIN 4SPEN, CO 81611 ASPEN, CO 81611 ASPEN, CO 81611 AAHONY KAITILIN MANCLARK WILLIAM & DARLEEN TRUST MARCUS ANN H 170 W 74TH ST #809 313 E BAY FRONT 735 W BLEEKER ST 4EW YORK, NY 10023 BALBOAISLAND, CA 92662 ASPEN, CO 81611-1133 MARSHALL ELLEN M & THOMAS M MARTINEAU DANIEL J & AMY N S MAWICKE FREDERICK H 300 RIVERSIDE AVE 201 SOUTH 7TH ST 719 W MAIN #205 ASPEN, CO 81611 ASPEN, CO 81611 ASPEN, CO 81611 .. ICDANIEL SHANNON B MEYER LAURA MEYER MARY ANNE 19 W MAIN ST #100 134 S 7TH ST PO BOX 11238 SPEN, CO 81611 ASPEN, CO 81611 ASPEN, CO 81612 OLSHAN BURTON D 1/2 IOUNTAIN RESCUE ASPEN INC NEVINS WENDY S OLSHAN KATHLEEN W 1/2 30 W MAIN ST 736 HOPKINS AVE 5408 OLD LEEDS RD SPEN, CO 81611 ASPEN, CO 81611 BIRMINGHAM, AL 35210 )NEIL BRIAN & SUZANNE P B HOLDINGS LLC PARKER GALE M ' O BOX 199 725 W BLEEKER ST PO BOX 1490 AVERNIER, FL 33070 ASPEN, CO 81611 ASPEN, CO 81612 'ATERSON CHARLES & FONDA PATRICK KEVIN PEARSON MARK M & LEES M 00 W HOPKINS AVE 730 E DURANT AVE @200 702 W MAIN ST ,SPEN, CO 81611 ASPEN, CO 81611 ASPEN, CO 81611 ZEED BRENT HAMPTON 67% REID BETSEY M REID SUZANNAH V K 00 N 8TH ST 59 FALLON DR PO BOX 10443 BPEN, CO 81611 NORTH HAVEN, CT 06473 ASPEN, CO 81612 AENO ASPEN PROPERTIES LLC RODRIGUEZ JOANN ROJAK JOHN ;05 W MAIN ST #002 PO BOX 2296 170 W 74TH ST #809 \SPEN, CO 81611 ASPEN, CO 81612 NEW YORK, NY 10023 SHADOW MTN CORP STARFORD PROPERTIES NV RUSSO NICK A C/O FINSER CORP C/O KEON WILLIAM )0 BOX 4743 550 BILTMORE WAX SUITE 900 550 BILTMORE WY 9TH FL \SPEN, CO 81612 CORAL GABLES, FL 33134-5779 CORAL GABLES, FL 33134 3TIRLING WILLIAM TAYLOR JOHN W SUTHERLAND ELIZABETH 3/O STIRLING HOMES INC 31050 W THOMPSON LN 719 W MAIN ST #202 300 E MAIN ST #102 HARTLAND, WI 53029 ASPEN, CO 81611 \SPEN, CO 81611 FHROM DOUGLAS H VALLEY MIA VERELLEN VIRGILE & CLAUDIA 317 W MAIN ST 740 W HOPKINS AVE 449 E COOPER 4SPEN, CO 81611 ASPEN, CO 81611 ASPEN, CO 81611 REIRA LINDA 50% INTEREST WABISZEWSKI SUSAN 1/2 WEIEN J ROBERT -IALL TERESA 50% INTEREST 728 W HOPKINS AVE 709 W MAIN ST 305 W MAIN ST ASPEN, CO 81611 ASPEN, CO 81611 ASPEN, CO 81611 ;, 24 .. WESTCHESTER INVESTMENTS INC /EST ALFRED P JR & LORALEE S WHITFIELD DONNAMARIE C C/O FINSER CORP 9416475 METAVANTE WAY 732 W HOPKINS AVE #A3 550 BILTMORE WAY SUITE 900 IOUX FALLS, SD 57186 ASPEN, CO 81611 CORAL GABLES, FL 33134-5779 /IDEN SHARI WINGSTONE TOY COMPANY LLC YOUNG DONALD L O BOX 4929 12 GREENBRIAR LN 617 W MAIN ST SPEN, CO 81612 PAOLI, PA 19301 ASPEN, CO 81611 OUNG JENNIFER A YULE LEAH E & BRADLEY A O BOX 9492 130 S 7TH ST#B 2 SPEN, CO 81612 ASPEN, CO 81611 SOLD DUPLEX /MULTI-LOT AS-N Aspen Board QWEALTORSÂ® Sold Vol: 1/1/2005 to 3/31/200 4 1 ML# 51400 Sold $144,9~~ COA \9 lit-1 4 1 11 -1 0 \ mck>7 14' 1 Sold Listings l./ 0. 0., 11$.3,1 :IN.... . . .1 .., . : /1 M raÂ« 1 ho Sub New Castle 0-4 C C b Ad TBD Broken Arrow New Castle j Legal Lot 9, Block E County Garf - Duplex/Multi-Lot Own Lohse Exc Right To Sell #Ac 0.36 Zn R2 Comp 3% BB/3% TB 11 SAc All Asn$ TBD 7 HSF Far Spec None 0lob \2_ GO LSF Faces Rett Frn Tx $945.00 Acc PX Grz TxYr 2003 Use MF Cap Util Res 12- 4% 5 <34â‚¬313% Aspen Survey San Cl, SW Lot CL, GC, VW GrzRgt Wtr Cl Amn PR, PE WtrÂ·Rut Gas AV, NG Extr CA, CM Wtr Elec Cl Disc MnR NO Irrq NO Crop Duplex lot in Lakota Canyon Ranch. Corner lot w/views! Town of N. Castle tap fees paid for both units. Also, town recreation fee SOf Non-Member Office SAg NON-MEMBER, AGENT 4 $136.900 03/04/05 D 112 CASH SIsP Kent Lohse 876-8768 Ofc Aspen Land & Homes SIR - Aspe 963-4536 Sign Y r i ML# 51593 Sold $1,385.000 ..? 1 IIi . *., I %. Â·: Â· Â·., Â·, ,; , .Â· (' / i 1 t 11 : - 1 1 1-lf , 71'. , 41 LD , Sub West End Ad 701 W Main Street Aspen LeGal H & I, Bl. 19 County Pitk '. t. Own Anson Exc Right To Sell i ./. ' 34 #Ac 0.13 Zn O Comp 3% TB, 3% BB $Ac All Asn$ 0 $, / j r HSF 700 Far Y Spec 0 LSF 5765 Faces NE Rett AS Frn East TX 2794.40 Acc PX, TC 1 Grz TxYr 2004 Use MF Cap Util Res 1 BA, CE, RG 4.-- WtrRit N Gas NG Extr FE, OB Survey N San AS Lot CL GrzRgt N Wtr AS Amn Wtr Elec HC Disc MnR Irrq Crop This property is in the process of historic lot split. Opportunity ~ i to redevelop and keep existing historic cabin. SOf Resort Quest Realty Aspen LLC SAg Nehasil Doualas j $1.200,000 01/24/05 D 55 CASH 4,9 Â¢Â· } SIsP Janine Hill 923-6677 1 Ofc Aspen Land & Homes Highlands 920-6775 ISiqn ~7 mh 04 / 1 Sold Listings 1. 1 Duplex/Multi-Lot Beyond Boundary 48 INFORMATION HEREIN DEEMED RELIABLE BUT NOT GUARANTEED 1 2 .. Aspen City Council 130 South Galena Street Aspen, Colo Re: 701 West Main Street Proposed Development . 14 February Meeting 07 February 2005 Dear Mayor and Council; My name is Rob Weien. Mary Lael<ner and I are the residents and owners o f the historic cabin immediately to the west of the proposed 701 West Main Street redevelopment. Throughout the past summer we have been actively involved in the HPC review ofÂ·the proposed property improvements to the east. At the start o f the appeal process our input was solicited by the applicant's representatives and the Board. However, as the summer wore on and meetings were cancelled and rescheduled, we found ourselves limited in opportunity to comment on the applicant's request for variances and adjustments. It was at the City Council meeting of January 10 that we first learned of the applicant's final requests to Council. We have since been noticed, as of last week, that the project has been amended further and that, in fact, has a new owner. Many o f the requested variances and adjustments before you will have an impact on the usability of our home at 709 where we have lived since 1989. Because of the extent of the proposed building area and massing, as well as the extent o f the excavation described, but not sketched by the applicant's designer, we urge the Council to be clear on what is being requested. We have the following concerns and/or areas o f the proposal(s) we would like clarified: 1) Hardship - It's unclear to us what the applicant' s hardship entails that would allow a lot split request to begin in the first place. 2) Existing Blue Spruce Tree - Initially, the design we were given by the applicant's designer showed the large, healthy blue spruce tree, located to the front o f the lot, to remain. The proposed structure adj acent to our home was to be set back to the south of the tree and the existing cabin was to be relocated to the east, adj acent to this tree. The cu.rrent design and description o f the work apparently include the removal of this tree. Such a loss will definitely increase the noise level within our home as well as add to the cooling demand in the summer months. Even more importantly, the loss of such a majestic tree, located at the City's entrance, will impact all that drive or walk by. Is the removal o f this tree part o f the request before you? 3) With all due respect to the findings of the HPC, the historical value of this small cabin, in our opinion, is really its representation of a 'typical' small home on a small out-lying city lot, indicative perhaps of our simpler rural past. This one historical attribute will be lost if it now becomes one o f several buildings clustered together on its minimum size, existing lot. 4) The request for ' extra' building area, we are assuming, is not counting any area not included in a 'full' basement. The former applicant's designer told us that his plan was to excavate the lot to 10 foot below existing grade and, that by City regulations, .. this area would not count in the over-all build-out. When this 'additional' area is included in the final product, it's difficult, in our opinion, to support a request for ' extra' area. While we are fully supportive o f an improvement o f the neighboring property, we also believe any considered lot split subdivision plat should indicate the final lot sizes and dimensions. The lot use should be clari fied and defined as well, so that a later variance by HPC or P and Z is not solicited. In addition, both parcels should be as close to the minimum lot size of 3,000 SF as possible and so configured that neither lot is allowed to 'bulk lip' to a greater size. In closing, we respectfully request that the Council.take the time, even in this minor development, to be clear as to the work proposed. At this time we are not sure what is in fact proposed and don't believe the Council has the information available to reach a sound and fair finding. Respectfully submitted, 0 Rd~Deien (Â»6 lo.~- Mfy Lackner /1/17 A,GL .. le , 1-1 0 - L#(Lt E-h EyuLA- 8 .. Dimensional Requirements Form (Item #10 on the submittal requirements key. Not necessary for :111~W*Â°jects.) Project: 7 0 i (440.T ~ 8, i Lof A Le crj-- kedi-b Applicant: Project Location: Zone District: Lot Size: Lot Area: (For the purposes of calculating Floor Area, Lot Area may be reduced for areas within the high water mark. easements, and steep slopes. Please refer to the definition of Lot Area iii the Municipal Code.) Commercial net leasable: Existbig. Proposed: Number of residential units: Existing.' Proposed: Number of bedrooms: Existilig. Proposed: Proposed % of demolition: DIMENSIONS: (write n/a where no requirement exists in the zone district) Floor Area: Existing: Allowable: Proposed: He i Ght Principal Bldg.: Existing.' Allowable: Proposed: Accessory Bldg.. Existing: Allowable: Proposed: On-Site parking: Existing.~ Required: Proposed: % Site coverage: Existing: Required: Proposed: Â°/0 Open Space: Existing.' Required: Proposed: 4-Front Setback: Existing. Â£41- Requked: ~ D' Proposed: f> ' L,Rear Setback: Existing~ A16- Required: Proposed Combined Front/Rear: Indicate N. S. E, W Existing.- Required: Proposed: L.-Side Setback: Â£~ Existing. h~ Required. Proposed: J.-Cb V Side Setback: CJ Existing: A,/>(1 Required- Proposed: /0/1 *,eÂ· Combined Sides: ExMAng: Required: Proposed: Distance between Existing.' Required: Proposed: buildings: Existing non:conformities or enc -oachinents and note if encroaghment liceiises have been issued: St X ek 7 F , . jov~ 7 tyL.143 6'-10*4 i,,na ; 94'L-4-DF Oupâ‚¬2_ 4Â· -0,4- e.ce,Â·t, b 1 0/Variations requbsted (identify the exactr,ariagges npeded): /, 1. .1 4-al/<le 50â‚¬ Coff.0-e>4 6-?tr 6 4-%*+C rÂ¥1...40(it. A'g/c-d)\K- ~ FEES DUE: $ . General Information Please check the appropriate boxes below and submit this page along withyour application. This infbrmation 11'ill help us review your plans and, ifnecessary, coordinate with other agencies thal niay be involved. YES NO Does the work you are planning include exterior work; including additions, demolitions, new construction. remodeling, rehabilitation or restoration? L,~cls Does the work you are planning include interior work; including remodeling. rehabilitation, or 1-estoration? ~ 62 4 Do you plan other future changes or improvements that could be reviewed at this tinie? 4 23 In addition to City of Aspen approval for a Certificate of Appropriateness or No -Negative Effect and a building permit. are you seeking to meet the Secretary of the Interior's Scandal-ds fur Rehabililation or restoration of a National Register of Historic Places property in order to qualify for state or federal tax credits? rJ O Ifyes are you seeking federal rehabilitation investment tax credits in conjunction with this project? (Only income producing properties listed on the National Register are eligible. Owner-occupied residential properties are not.) If yes. are you seeking the Colorado State Income Tax Credit for Historical Preservation? Please check all City of Aspen Historic Preservation Benefits which you plan to use: Rehabilitation Loan Fund Conservation Easement Program 06hnensional Variances Increased Density 0-listoric Landmark Lot Split 1/*aiver of Park Dedication Fees C.onditional Uses Exemption from Growth Management Quota System VTax Credits .. CITY OF ASPEN COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT Agreement for Pavment of Citv gf +Spen De~elopment Application Fees CITY OF ASPEN (hereinafter CITY) and Motikwit Â« 9-)Ack /1 (hereinafter APPLICANT) AGREE AS FOLLOWS: l. 0APPLICANI has submigal to CITY,an,pplication for /7 A. ~efabi# , 61 evn â‚¬ 07- (24\ ca-* Valia,n,Le><l (hereinafter. THE PROJECT). 2. APPLICANT understands and agrees that City of Aspen 01-dinance No. 57 (Series of 2000) establishes a fee structure for Â·Land Use applications and the payment of all processing fees is a condition iii-ecedent to a determination of application completeness. APPLICANT and CITY agree that because of the size. nature or scope of the proposed project it is not possible at this time to ascertain the full extent of the costs involved in processing the application. APPLICANT and CITY further agree that it is in the interest of the parties that APPLICANT make payment of an initial deposit and to thereafter permit additional costs to be billed to APPLICANT on a monthly basis. APPLICANT agrees additional costs niay accrue following t]1eir hearings and/or approvals. APPLICANT agrees he will be benefited by retaining greater cash liquidity and will make additional payments upon notification by the CITY when they are necessary as costs are incurred. CITY agrees it will be benefited through the greater certainty of recovering its full costs to process APPLICANT'S application. 4. CITY and APPLICANT further agree that it is impracticable for CITY staff to complete processing or present sufficient information to the Planning Commission and/or City Council to enable the Planning Commission and/or City Council to make legally required findings for project consideration, unless current billings are paid in full prior to decision. 5. Therefore, APPLICANT agrees that in consideration of the CITYs waiver of its right to collect full fees prior to a determination of application completeness, APPLICANT shall pay an initial deposit in the amount of $ ' 1*,1,00 which is for kÂ·% hours of Community Development staff time. and if actual recorded costs exceed the initial deposit. APPLICANT shall pay additional monthly billings to CITY to reiinburse the CITY for the processing of the application mentioned above, including post approval review at a rate of $205.00 per planner hour over the initial deposit. Such periodic payments shall be made within 30 days of the billingdate. APPLICANT further agrees that failure to pay such accrued costs shall be grounds for suspension of processjp*and in no case will building permits be issued until all costs associated with case processing hav#/6een paid- WV f CITY OF ASPEN APPLICA#gf /R-4._ Q 4\ Ut By: .Julie Ann Woods 81.X-~~-1< ,7~--f* . Community Development Director Date: 9 1*Â£ / ck Mailing Address: A f 0. L i A / 3- 3-3- 2- 1 1- h ADA A 00 Stj (DrÂ» g:\support\forms\agrpayas.doc 1/10/01 RETAIN FOR PERMANENT RECORD EXHIBIT L./.- zfc)-ID g Main Street ~ LUL- L 0 0 BASIS OF BEARING f\\\\\\\\\ S 75Â°09'11" E 270.02' DITCH 57.65' --- 15~10 -------------- _________-__-___-~ 1 i: i 1 li l: 9 11 1 i 57'-7%" 0 30'-O" 27'-794 A 1 1 ~1 1 1 1 1 1 ~1 1 il li li i i i i : I 1 1 11 1 ~1 1 1Z 1 1 LOT'B' HISTORIC ~ 2 1: 3,000 s.f. LOT'A' i -i 1 i 1 2,765 s.f. 1 1 1- 101 ALLOWABLE ALLOWABLE ' 0 1 O 1 lei 1 1. 0 8 FAR SINGLE FAR MIXED 9 4 1 1 FAM I LY LOT USE LOT a 1 1 1 = 2,400 sq.ft. 2,765 x .75 1 = 2,073.75 sq.ft. 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 H I I I \ 1-n \ 1 1 1 1 5 1 1 -1 I I W 1 1 1 p 1 1 1 1 -1 1 r- 1 1 1 r-11 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 9 BLOCK 19 i City ofAspeh , I: --- S 75Â°09'11" E 57.65' 15710 1 Public Alley SCALE: 1/8" = 1'-0' 01 4 8 16 lilli NagleHartrayDankerKaganMcKayPenney 701 WEST MAIN STREET HISTORIC LOT SPLIT PLAN ARCHITECTS, LTD. ASPEN, COLORADO 1 30 West Monroe Street Chicago, Illinois 60603 7 FEBRUARY 2005 Drawing 1 of 4 T. 312.425 F~ 9 . DITCH 6th Street M â€ž6t,09.* L S Â°50'49" E Main Street BASIS OF BEARING ~ S 75Â°09'11" E 270.02' -- - ----- - ------ DITCH - --- ------ ----- - -- - -- --- -- --- -- 57.65' *- - -- - 1 9 101 f =f=---- 1 L EXIST\NO FENCE t/--,--- - ---t --- 1 1 - LA. 111 TO BE REMOVED ~,/' 111 , 1.:1 \ 1 / 1 1 1 1 / \1 I 11 / I f EXISTINe TRE B 1 *1 1 1 C\11 1 57'-7%" 1 0 5 1 < 1 1 't Lt 30'_~ 6 27'-7%",1 I il 1 1 , 1 1 1 / il /\ 1 I 16.2' .: I 1 1 1 4 111 \ 1 1 . - 1/1 1 1 2 --------1---__-___sbul-4-FORTION 1 n TÂ¢ Bl RELOCATED ~~~ ~ ~ ~ ~ b r -1 1 L-U 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 OVE SJORY 1 1 1 1 11 HOUGE I 1 79 Jl 1 I 1 rip' 6 2: 1 1 1 "i 1 1 1 01 M 1-: IZ N ' 41 '32 1 MIDDLE |PORTION ' DECK i 1.1 1 1 1 TO ~313 *LOCATED ~ rt-1 (2 1 I l ' s -----____u lEi 1 I : 1 1 1 1 1 1 '01 11 ' lei 1 1 11 1 0 1 1 t< Q 1 1 1 1 + 1 1 1 111 1 ' SOU][H PIORTION 1 1 1 TO BE RELOCATED ~ WALK -_---L--1 1 r--- 1 1 ------ --- 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 6.2,1 1 L-----------A------ - 20.5'- 1 1 1 1: 1 1 1iJ HI I I -: 1 EXETING PENCE 3~ I. E 1 -1 TO BE REMOVED ~ ~ ~ ~- EXE-1-INe FENDE 112 1 I I LD 1 TO BE REMOVEN 1 -1 1 ~ ~ ~ TO BE REMOVED i 2 11 EXISTINe TREE \ 1 m 1 1 1 1 1 1 14,0' r----- -------- ------------------__-__ _1[0 ~ BLOCK 19 c-- - i ~ G WALK 1 / 1 1 24.0' / 1 - 3 1 City of Aspeh 1 1 1 11 X15-TINe SHED TO BE DEMOLISHED 1 1 1 1 i 38.7' 1 - -2 S 75Â°09'11" E 57.65' No/h 15710 A . Public Alley SCALE: 1/8" = 1'-0" A-/ 16C/3 - ~ lilli NagleHartrayDankerKaganMcKayPenney 701 WEST MAIN STREET HISTORIC DEMO & ARCHITECTS, LTD. ASPEN, COLORADO RELOCATION PLAN B -2 30 West Monroe Street Chicago, Illinois 60603 7 FEBRUARY 2005 Drawing 2 of 4 T. 312.425 .. , DITCH -- --- - ---- ---- - - --- ----- bin :street ' E 100.00' - Main Street O 0 BASIS OF BEARING S 75Â°09'11" E 270.02' -------------- DITCH ------ --------------------- ---------- ----- __ 57.65' 1 = I - - - -I~i - ---9 - - I*~-7 EXISTING FENCE -r--- gil 1 TO BE REMOVED/--- f U, 1 1 1 ~1 1; / 11 11 r \ 6,1 1 1 1 11 1 1 1 1 / 1 \ 1 1 11'll ki 1 f EXISTING TREh 1 9 1 57'--1%" 1 01 1 1 ), oli 1 1 1 ' 30'-0" 27'-7%1 | 1 1 1 1 / 1 il 1 / 1 1 1 1 1 1 :16.2' 1 /1 1 1 I I 1 / 1 1 / 1 1 1 1 - I 1 1 -/, 1 ' ---------- -1-_---__---_5+TI{-PORTION ' 1 1 1 1 1 f 1 1 1 TÂ¢) BE RELOCATED ,I' 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 r------ -1--1------------1 1 1 I b E-1 li Il l Ill L- 1 d, 04 4ORY j 11 1 1 qi 1 1 1 1 1 HOUEE 1 - 1 1 lifll N\~\ 1 M I_. i 17111 1 I 1 1 1 1 ~ lA, i Iz '<i" 1 NI N I ial 1 1 "1 . 1 0 0 CA 1 1 Crl 1 9 11 MIDOLE PORTION 1 DECK =-10 I Al 1 oil fE I 1 TO ~E *LOCATED 1 t' 9 1 1 2------2 If' 1 1-11 lo: 1 '' 10 O 101 1 1 IM 1 1. 1 1 1 1-JI 10 0 Q 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 ' 1 Boul[H FloRTION --1 I 11 J TO BE RELOCATED ~ I 1 1 1 1 1144\< < I I Â«thy------- , X 1- U V I 1 1 1 L---------- ------~%1~1 1,1 1,44/*11 1 11 16.21 k 1 1 1 P~ 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 H ti~ 1 2 5 1 1 1 1 IN 4144Â« 1 1 r- 1 \U.,1 1 1 TÂ®\.1?ENCE Â« 1 0 1 --1 \~,VED 1 1 ~ ~ ~ EXISTING RENAE 1 7 1 1 w 1 TO BE REMOVER 1 1 413 1 1 4 11 r It Z ' 1 | F EXISTING TREE \ ' 1 lik TOBIE REMOVED 1 1 J 1 1 16 1 1 WALK) 1 to--9 ' BLOCK 19 -9- -1 .\\ \ ~ | 24.0' Ii' 61 1 City ofAspeb / 1 1 11 IN XISTING SHEErTUBE-DEFEETERED i I ' 11 / 1 1 38.7' 1 157~ S 75Â°09'11" E 57.65' Public Alley 01 4 8 16/ SCALE: 1/8" = 1'-00 lilli 3 NagleHartrayDankerKaganMcKayPenney 701 WEST MAIN STREET HISTORIC DEMO & ARCHITECTS, LTD. ASPEN, COLORADO RELOCATION PLAN B 30 West Monroe Street Chicago, Illinois 60603 7 FEBRUARY 2005 Drawing 3 of 4 T. 312.425.MIIA ------ DITCH --------------------- 6th Street - Main Street 0 0 BASIS OF BEARING S 75Â°09'11" E 270.02' DITCH --------------- ------ -------- Ill-Ii-Iill'll Ii- ~ITZ-%------ 5 --'--7--F-- I 1,13 1 -~1 1 6 t. 1 .Â« ~ 11-611 1 1 72-0 -LOCATION- i PROPOSED | ' ' OF RELOCATED ' 1 EXISTING STRUCTURE i 20'_0" 5'-4" 0 * f _00-- *. 30'-0" 1 27'-796" 0 G 2 00 1 1 1 1 f 1 1 --0-101 f F L ---0 1 -1 l 1 1 1 1 1 PROPOSED LOCATION i i OF NEW ' SINGLE FAMILY 1 1 1 1 HOUSE i i 1 1 1 1 1 r---1 .--- 1 1 :: 1 1 1 1 1 111 11 1 1,1 1 Xi' 1 1 1 / 1 1 1 1 / 1 1 / 1 -\ i / 1 . \ i . 1 \ / 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 PROPOSED i LobATION OK N~w 1 1 CONDOM|M UM ,wthi~ 1 1/\ 1 1 1 / - 1 I . 1 /\ / 1 1 1 1 1 1 1/ \1 1 1 1 1 1 4 If 83 31-(j" Eng ~ Norlh 0 1 4 8 16 /0 SCALE: 1/8- = 1'-0" lilli NagleHartrayDankerKaganMcKayPenney 701 WEST MAIN STREET HISTORIC DEMO & ARCHITECTS, LTD. ASPEN, COLORADO RELOCATION PLAN B 30 West Monroe Street Chicago, Illinois 60603 7 FEBRUARY 2005 Drawing 4 of 4 T 312.425~ DITCH 6th Street