The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About!landuse case.HP.616 W Main St.HPC025-00 CASE NUMBER PARCEL ID # CASE NAME PROJECT ADDRESS PLANNER CASE TYPE OWNER/APPLICANT REPRESENTATIVE DATE OF FINAL ACTION CITY COUNCIL ACTION PZ ACTION ADMIN ACTION BOA ACTION DATE CLOSED BY o HPC025-00 2735-124-44007 616 W. Main 51. Minor HPC 616 W. Main 51. Amy Guthrie Minor HPC W.R Mannclark 5ven Erik Alstrom 10/11/02 HPC Reso. 49-2000 Approved 6/17/02 J. Lindt '0 () n ( V/~ J f' fl . DEVELOPMENT ORDER of the City of Aspen Community Development Department This Development Order, hereinafter "Order", is hereby issued pursuant to Section 26.304.070, "Development Orders", and SectiOD 26.308.010, "Vested Property Rights", of the City of Aspen Municipal Code. This Order allows development of a site specific development plan pursuant to the provisions of the land use approvals, described herein. The effective date of this Order shall also be the initiation date of a three-year vested property right. The vested property right shall expire on the day after the, third anniversary of the effective date of this Order, unless a building permit is approved pursuant to Section 26.304.075, or unless an exemption, extension, reinstatement, or a revocation is issued by City Council pursuant to Section 26.308.010. After Expiration of vested property rights, this Order shall remain in full fore:: and effect, excluding any growth management allotments granted pursuant to Section 26.470, but shall be subject to any amendments to the Land Use Code adopted since the effective date of this Order. This Development Order is associated with the property noted below for the site specific development plan as described below. W,R. Manclark, 126 W. Francis St.. Aspen. CO 81611 Property Owner's Name, Mailing Address and telephone number Lots O-S. Block 24, City and Townsite of Aspen Legal Description and Street Address of Subject Property Minor HPC Approval Written Description of the Site Specific Plan and/or Attachment Describing Plan HPC Resolution # 49-2000 Land Use Approval(s) Received and Dates (Attach Final Ordinances or Resolutions) October 2 1. 2000 Effective Date of Development Order (Same as date of publication of notice of approval.) October 22, 2003 Expiration Date of Development Order (The extension, reinstatement, exemption from expiration and revocation may be pursued in accordance with Section 26.308,0 I 0 of the City of Aspen Municipal Code,) Issued this 21st day of October, 2000, by the City of Aspen Community e elopment Director. - cJ ie Ano Woods, Commum y Development Director J . (") tl PUBLIC NOTICE Of DEVELOPMENT APPROVAL Notice is hereby given to the general public of the approval of a site specific development plan, and the creation of a vested property right pursuant to the Land Use Code of the City of Aspen and Title 24, Article 68, Colorado Revised Statutes, pertaining to the following described property: Lots Q-S, Block 24, City and TOWDsite of Aspen, by resolution of the Historic Preservation Commission numbered 49, series of2000. For further information contact Julie Ann Woods, at the AspenlPitkin Community Development Dept. 130 S. Galena St, Aspen, Colorado (970) 920-5090. sf City of Aspen Account Publish in The Aspen Times on October 21, 2000 I ~."l , n n ATTACHMENT 1 ASPEN/PITKIN COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT City of Aspen Development Application Fee Policy The City of Aspen, pursuant to Ordinance 45 (Series of 1999), has established a fee structure for the processing ofland use applications. A flat fee or deposit is collected for land use applications based on the type of application submitted. Referral fees for other City departments reviewing the application will also be collected when necessary. One check including the deposit for Planning and referral agency fees must be submitted with each land use application, made payable to the AspenfPitkin Community Development Department. Applications will not be accepted for processing without the required application fee. I- A flat fee is collected by Community Development for Administrative Approvals which normally take a minimal and predictable amount of staff time to process. The fee is not refundable. A deposit is collected by Community Development when more extensive staff review is required, as hours are likely to vary substantially from one application to another. Actual staff time spent will be charged against the deposit. Several different staff members may charge their time spent 00 the case in addition to the case planner. Staff time is logged to the case and staff can provide a summary report of hours spent at the applicant's request. After the deposit has been expended, the applicant will be billed monthly based on actual staff hours. Applicants may accrue and be billed additional expenses for a planner's time spent on the case following any hearing or approvals, up until the applicant applies for a building permit. Current billings must be paid within 30 days or processing of the application will be suspended. If an applicant has previously failed to pay application fees as required, no new or additional applications will be accepted for processing until the outstanding fees are paid. In no case will Building Permits be issued until all costs associated with case processing have been paid. When the case planner determines that the case is completed (whether approved or not approved), the case is considered closed and any remaining balance from the deposit will be refunded to the applicant. ' Applications which require a deposit must include an Agreement for Payment of Development Application Fees. The Agreement establishes the applicant as being responsible for payment of all costs associated with processing the application. The Agreement must be signed by the party responsible for payment and submitted with the application and fee in order for a land use case to be opened. The current complete fee schedule for land use applications is listed on the reverse side. ~ tl n ASPENIPITKIN COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT Agreement for Payment of City of Aspen Development Application Fees CITY OF ASPEN (hereinafter CITY) and '\All L.~,.... M (hereinafter APPLICANT) AGREE AS FOLLOWS: 'R MA",'C.LA~K I. APPLICANT has submitted to CITY an application for (hereinafter, THE PROJECT). 2. APPLICANT understands and agrees that City of Aspen Otdinance No, 45 (Series of 1999) establishes a fee structure for Land Use applications and the payment of all processing fees is a condition precedent to a determination of application completeness, 3, APPLICANT and CITY agree that because of the size, nature or scope of the proposed project, it is not possible at this time, to ascertain the full extent of the COStS involved in processing the' application. APPLICANT and CITY further agree that it is in the interest of the panies that APPLICANT make payment of an initial deposit and to thereafter permit additional costs to be billed to APPLICANT on a monthly basis, APPLICANT agrees additional costs may accrue following their hearings and/or approvals. APPLICANT agrees he will be benefited by retaining greater cash liquidity and will make additional payments upon notification by the CITY when they are necessary as costs are incurred. CITY agrees it will be benefited through the greater certainty of recovering its full costs to process APPLICANT'S application, 4, CITY and APPLICANT further agree that it is impracticable for CITY staff to complete processing or ptesent sufficient information to the Planning Commission and/or City Council to enable the Planning Commission and/or City Council to make legally required findings for project consideration, unless current billings are paid in full prior to decision. 5, Therefore, APPLICANT agrees that in consideration of the CITY's waiver of its right to collect full fees prior to a determination of application completeness, APPLICANT shall pay an initial deposit in the amount of$ q.Ab~ which is for J. hours of Community Development staff time, and if actual recorded costs exceed the initial deposit, APPLICANT shall pay additional monthly billings to CITY to reimburse the CITY for the processing of the application mentioned above, including post approval review, Such periodic payments shall be made within 30 days of the billing date, APPLICANT further agrees that failure to pay such accrued costs shall be grounds for suspension of processing, and in no case will building permits be issued until all costs associated with case processing have been paid. CITY OF ASPEN APPLICANT B ~4- .J Julie Ann Woods Community Development Director BY:~#~?~~ Date: ' ;7 hi /o~ / / Mailing Address: g:lsu pportlformslagrpa yas.doc 12/27/99 /..2.~ ~ ~~ C:J6""~, & #~// (/"LJ 3/.3 ~ d,/: v.~ ~~~~ ,?.;2 c; 6 Z-- I (l (') ASPEN/PITKIN COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT 2000 LAND USE APPLICATION FEES CA TEGORY HOURS DEPOSIT Major '* Minor Staff Approvals Flat Fee 12 $~O -6 [~v ~ VI ocJ Vs ') 2,310.00 1,1SS.0tl 480.00 Exempt HPC Minor HPC Significant HPC <1000 sq. ft. Significant HPC >1000 sq, ft. Demolition, Partial Demolition, Relocation :j.. Referral Fees - Environmental Health Major Minor Referral Fees - Housing Major Minor Referral Fees - City Engineer Major Minor Hourly Rate FLAT FEE 265.00 65,00 480.00 1155.00 2310,00 2310,00 330.00 170.00 330.00 170.00 330,00 170,00 195.00 n () ....... MEMORANDUM TO: Aspen Historic Preservation Commission Julie Ann Woods, Community Development Director ON Joyce Ohlson, Deputy Planning Director , : ~ , THRU: FROM: Amy Guthrie, Historic Preservation Officer RE: 616 W. Main Street- Minor Review, Public Hearing DATE: October 11, 2000 SUMMARY: This property contains a miner's cottage and an outbuilding, both of which were moved from the other side of the street. The site is landmark designated and located within the Main Street Historic District. The applicant requests HPC approval to alter a roof line on the historic house and to install a new window in the historic outbuilding, which has been remodeled to serve as an ADU. These requests, as well as some other minor chaoges to the structures, were brought before HPC in September, 1999. The board asked for further study and better drawings for the roof and window change, which have been submitted for this meeting. APPLICANT: William Manclark, owner. LOCATION: 616 W. Main Street, LotN, Block 24, City and Townsite of Aspen. ZONING: The property is zoned "0, Office," and is a designated historic landmark. MINOR DEVELOPMENT No approval for any development in the "H," Historic Overlay District, or involving historic landmarks shall be graoted unless the Historic Preservation Commission finds that all of the following staodards (Section 26.415.01O.B.4) are met: a. The proposed development is compatible in general design, scale, site plan, massing and volume with designated historic structures located on the parcel and with development on adjacent parcels when the subject site is in an "H," Historic Overlay District, or is adjacent to an historic landmark. For historic landmarks where proposed development would extend into front yard, side yard and rear yard setbacks, extend into the minimum distance between buildings on the lot, exceed the allowed floor area by up to five hundred (500) square feet, or exceed the allowed site coverage by up to five (5) percent, the n " Historic Preservation Commission may grant necessary variances after making a finding that such variation is more compatible in character with the historic landmark and the neighborhood than would be development in accord with dimensional requirements. In no event shall variations pursuant to this Section exceed those variations allowed under Section 26.520.040(B)(2), for detached accessory dwelling units. Response: The historic house has the typical floor plan for the miner's cottages, including a kitchen addition at the rear of the building with a low pitched shed roof. The applicant requests HPC approval to overframe the kitchen roof so that it lands higher on the back of the east west running gable, to improve drainage. ,. Staff has concerns with altering the roof shape of a historic portion of the building, however, proper drainage is important to the long term preservation of the structure. If the roof is to be reconstructed, staff recommends that the point at which the new slope hits the back of the cross gable is as low as possible (perhaps much lower than the midpoint) and that such an alteration only be approved if a cricket and gutter, or some other improvement to the drainage, is not adequate. In regard to the proposal to add an egress window to the ADU, staff does not support the request for two reasons. First, staff and HPC were opposed to cutting through the eaveline of the original structure when this was discussed in 1999. Secondly, the loft that has been constructed on the barn was not meant to be a sleeping area, therefore it had to meet UBC requirements for light and air, but not the same exiting requirements of a bedroom. If the egress window is added, it seems to encourage the idea that this is a second bedroom. This is inappropriate because already there are no on site parking spaces and extra bedrooms could increase the occupancy of the building. Further, park dedication fees, which are calculated based on the number of bedrooms on the property, only accounted for one bedroom in the ADU. While the applicant argues that someone could fall asleep in the loft space, and he is concerned with liability in case of a fire, the same issue could present itself in any other room of any house where the regulations for bedroom egress don't have to be met. Staff therefore does not support the new window on the historic carriage house. If the applicant wishes to make an alteration to any of the windows that are already existing on the east and west sides of the loft, for instance to make them casement windows so that they would be easier to escape through, the HPC could review that request. b. The proposed development reflects and is consistent with the character of the neighborhood of the parcel proposed for development. Response: The proposed changes would not affect the character of the neighborhood. c. The proposed development enhances or does not detract from the historic significance of designated historic structures located on the parcel proposed for development or adjacent parcels. 2 I n " Response: The proposal would not affect the significance of the miner's cottage as an example of a 19th century home, or the bam as a 19th century outbuilding. d. The proposed development enhances or does not diminish or detract from the architectural character and integrity of a designated historic structure or part thereof. Response: Staff is concemed that the proposed alterations may diminish the architectural integrity of both buildings. In the case of the roof change on the house, some alteration that addresses drainage issues but preserves the original design of the structure should be worked out. Staff does not see a similar solution for the carriage house. The "pop-top" roof was a significant compromise to the: character of the building in and of itself, and it might not have been approved at all had other implications, such as the request for this new window, been represented at that time. I- ALTERNATIVES: The HPC may consider any of the following alternatives: · Approve the application as submitted. · Approve the application with conditions to be met prior to issuance of a building permit. · Table action to allow the applicant further time for restudy. recommendations should be offered.) (Specific · Deny approval finding that the application does not meet the Development Review Standards. RECOMMENDATION AND RECOMMENDED MOTION: Staff recommends that the applicant and HPC discuss the most minimal alteration that can be made to the kitchen roof, which effectively addresses the drainage problem. Staff recommends that the HPC deny the request to add a new window to the carriage house as proposed. An alteration to an existing window on the east or west sides of the loft could be proposed to HPC. Exhibits: A. Staff memo dated October II, 2000. B. Application. 3 n (') ALSTROMGROUP ECOLOGICAL ARCHITECTURE POST OFFICE BOX 551 ASPEN, COLORADO 81612 432 TWINING FLATS ROAD, WOODY CREEK, COLORADO 970 925 1745 / 970 925 4576 fax I I I 25 AUGUST 2000 I Amy Guthrie, Historic Preservation Officer CITY OF ASPEN / COMMUNITY DEVELOPMET City Hall 130 South Galena Aspen, Colorado 81611 HPC MINOR DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION Dr. William Mannclark 616 West Main Aspen, Colorado 81611 I- Dear Amy, I Attached are two copies of an HPC Minor Development application for the above residence. We need approval for a roof modification for adequate drainage of the historic house and for the addition of an egress opening (door or casement window) for the ADU unit. ~~7 Sven Enk Alstrom AlA B~LH~t~ 1S n f') ATTACHMENT 1 LAND USE APPLICATION FORM (indicate street address, lot and block number or metes and bounds description) or--FJ~ . 3. Present ZOning~ '20;.;..e::; 4. Lot size 3DOO.s~, FT 1. Project name 2. Project location 5. Applicant's name, address and phone number :tR. WR IY\MNC/~ /z!(J W' r-;;2.A/\JC/ '-, , '1 ';2qJ :3 Z '2S: 0 6, Representative's name, address, and phone number. e 'I. s~A1.1 ) t=:5 8/ fp /? ~-:;25 Ir1S FAV c;25 4'57//7 7, Type of application (check all tliat a Iy): r y- '(-' Conditional Use Special Review 8040 Greenline Stream Margin Subdivision GMQS allotment View Plane Lot Split/Lot Line Adjustment Conceptual SPA _ Conceptual HPC Final SPA Final HPC Conceptual PUD :x. Minor HPC Final PUD L"'" Relocation HPC Text/Map Amend. .'><:' Historic Landmark GMQS exemption ,r- "Demo/Partial Demo Condominiumization_ Design Review Appeal Committee 8, Description of existing uses (number and type of existing structures, approximate sq. ft., number of bedrooms, any previous5Provals granted ~C property) f2/!..siJ'>.f:JA)77/r? ~ 77AJn TF<U(:,7U ~ Y ~~ '; ~#5Yff-/5srbVL~ / R. AnD EEJP0.-<:""S nmR -rn A:~ CUR/2MJT (JJINlJJf)J ~~S 'D[) NfJT T VBG 10, Jiave you completed and attached the following? DF2&NINb OF X' Attachment 1- Land use application form AT U~ T v Attachment 2- Dimensional requirements form 2?J X 24- 1/ \...0'" Response to Attachment 3 ~~ \/ Response to Attachment 4 II ~ ~ I/~/ \~ <:. ',/ ~ W/fIlJ::::(;()J..) n tl ATTACHMENT 2 DIMENSIONAL REQUIREMENTS FORM Applicant: Address: Zone district: Lot size: Existing FAR: Allowable FAR: Proposed FAR: Existing net leasable (commercial): Proposed net leasable (commercial): Existing % of site coverage: Proposed % of site coverage: Existing % of open space: ~ ~ Proposed % of open space: ___ Existing maximum height: Principal bldq: NO~H-~Accesory bldq: /ol([) CI'fm&e- Proposed max, height: Principal bldq: Accessory bldq: Proposed % of demolition: ~' . I , A !J Existing number of bedrooms: -ro;<:::/ c. / / A-DU & .JTlUYMfA Proposed number of bedrooms: 0 c-HM~ :<. ft)7"'A-'L-- Existing on-site parking spaces: oN-e-. On-site parking spaces required: 0 ~ t{J/L-i.J//'i}y., IYVtNc ~~ t{J ~ST m.,f7N rYPP'LJL.... ~OO ~* tiT, . OJ S ,r=T. Setbacks Existing: Front: No {;tt:1r1J&e. Rear: Combined Front/rear: Side: Side: Combined Sides: MinimumJr,~ui~~~J.a? Front: ~nnr;>V Rear: Combined Front/rear: Side: Side: Combined Sides: Proposed: Front: N0 C~ Rear: Combined Front/rear: Side: Side: Combined Sides: e (HPC has the ability to vary the following requirements: setbacks, distance between buildings, FAR bonus of up to 500 sq,ft" site coverage variance up to 5%, height variations under the cottage infill program, parking waivers for residential uses in the R-6, R.15, RMF, CC, and 0 zone districts) n (") 18 ~Conln!Ullity'Pag8s :~ i.:";,,' -,~H~ <oUSW1:STl'9'M '::;""'. Aspen Street lvfnp ." '" '" ~"- ------~ <. ,-- I:: i~ /~ /' / Aspe West ii . . ""-P~~ Le C.~TI.N ,-.. Ii HPC MINOR DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION august 25, 2000 Dr. William ManncLark 616 West Main Aspen, Colorado 81611 ATTACHMENT 4: 4. WRITTEN DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSAL ITEM ONE: We are requesting a roof replacement of a low sloped Existing roof which is causing significant drainage problems For the Historic Residence. We are requesting to revise the roof as shown in sketch SK1 dated august 25, 2000. See also attached xerox of photos & previous application. ITEM TWO: We are requesting to provide adequate egress from the Upper level of an existing recent detached ADU. The current windows do not meet requirements specifically For egress. Mr. ManncLark rents out the ADU and we are requesting To add a small door on the alley side with a guardrail Similar to another "carriage house ADU" in the west end. We do have foreseeability of harm and legal issues with Regard to the existing second level. Mr. ManncLark is Currently renting out the ADU and has a tenant occupying The upper level. See also attached xerox of phots & previous application. We are requesting to add a small door & guardrail as shown In sketch SK2 dated august 25, 2000. ~' IYJ .A;A.fJ::;UrF<-K 2- .EX" TI NO F<.'OCJF / T-MV\ FLAT n. O/W, F<.OOF , ' IJ.)(!, ~I}e, S T TO 1m S P-OO F /\f:::,OUT uP !J5. '1-; s T 6A:13lfL.--.. N~Tff TO DR7't1;\J Ov-e,RF~ J /2 W)('( 51.- OF> / AJ -6 TO Tf/1S ~, I of- I n IY\A:1V/IJc ~I'(R:K 2- (") ~s ) r~ ..l.c.. ., ~..."T ~-- - J l .......: " .. ~~:'::::"---"S~"'.s, -- .......... - ........---......: ",", ~'.--:::.~<'<>"'--"'~ ~---~"~.~ --~". -- """"- ..... ~-------~:-':.....".:: -======-~----:::~~-:- /T--MY\ -mJO,' ~ ~ue~T A1J (5/1\16 cf.., ') E(F:0 S ":::> /;tJ11V:!:5'O N Sf MIL- ~ To l3,.fZ,GOw :t::oU13~ WINDOW, f n e){J ~T F~ R,OOi'""' I IRcoFl [1"0 f';E~A 11'1 '/ I... , /1' """ I I () / j j Ifl ~ 1l::F< I G H'DU'VB -TN6'5T E'L..E\lATION - ~ANCLAf<l< Re=PLAC~ Y'J J$!D1'l'6 'TO ,~......,...-....,.J.. ::::"" I~"';' lV-r-\IVt, ..-~,c.....; I eEL- oN ~ltr;N& ~INC:O~ So/ FASClf ~BLE .A~\;~ S!JIN6' "liD RS'iv~N 01 D 01 NT ::).(.1 T S!Clj~ FOR.CH f U?lt'.o N. rv1AIN &/2.'6/ '200'0 $ f:.cr'lC H- ONE o (') S Ee e:,,:x',A,~e A4010 AxeD G ce:::rH N D MIL. 5i I'k:SL.C ADD ']..1- 011,><- 31_(..111 r+ C?--,~ M5'.lT 2L Q...'\ I;:: DA, Ii ~'--,~~V'1;- 1.~I- c"OGl') -AL-L-EY Vim / ADU )v1A\JCL.AR~. & 10 N I ~,AJ N o/'2'S> / '2000 -~=~-"SKETcrl TWO ! n n .. ~~~ ~~ht('ntit or-~~~ J~#~~' ~~~~~~,I/~ ~~ /0 ~ .5.5"1 ~ ~ ?/~/;- ~?c) ?,.2S-/ /7/:5- , 9',zs- - ~D1't tAf'~t.J( ~ ~ ~~~r'~e~~~~~ ~~ ~ ~/(/, >. ~t1'f~~ ~~,~ &. /7 5f,tMO L~~~~ ~-// //'~~41~tPf1 /02~ ,r:/t'. ~ 1'H-"';'./ c:P)b~~ ~ jY6// t7L- 3/3~~~~ ~~~~f"U~2--1 ?~.? ?"..z 3 OA?3 i I I I