The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutLand Use Case.17 Shady Ln.A112-01V N l It- \ 1/ IN-A V V | r 'ijÂ»ke Ale-iD) -11 100 2- S - , /Il/- 1vi~'-71 6 4...Ill,- COMMUNITY DEELO*MENT DEPARTMENT 130 South Galena Street , ~ ' Aspen, Colorado 81611 (970) 920-5090 City of Aspen Land Use: 1041 Deposit ) *6 On 1042 Flat Fee 1043 HPC 1046 Zoning and Sign Referral Fees: 1163 City Engineer 1*1:f n 1205 Environmental Health 1190 Housing Building Fees: 1071 Board of Appeals 1072 Building Permit 1073 Electrical Permit 1074 Energy Code Review f 1075 Mechanical Permit . 1076 Plan Check IL 1077 Plumbing Permit 9 1078 Reinspection ' 1079 Aspen Fire Other Fees: 1 1006 Copy ~ 1165 Renip Fee 1302 GIS Maps ~ 1303 GIS Fee ~ 1481 Housing Cash in Lieu ~_ 1383 Open Space Cash in Lieu F 1383 Park Dedication 1468 Parking Cash in Lieu Performance Deposit 1268 Public Right-of-way 1164 School District Land Ded. TOTAL / 8 E~03 NAME: ,-- /Â· ' 0 , ! '/1 ADDRESS/PROJECT: L. ~ PHONE: I CHECK# CASE/PERMIT#: # OF COPIES: DATE: INITIAL: CASE NUMBER A112-01 PARCEL ID # 2737-073-00010 CASE NAME Bell Residence Stream Margin Review PROJECT ADDRESS 17 Shady Lane PLANNER Fred Jarman CASE TYPE Stream Margin Review OWNER/APPLICANT Roaring Fork LLC. C/o Fred Smith REPRESENTATIVE Glenn Horn DATE OF FINAL ACTION CITY COUNCIL ACTION PZ ACTION ADMIN ACTION App. Withdrawn BOA ACTION DATE CLOSED 3/29/02 BY J. Lindt .. PARCEL ID:|2737-073-00010 - DATE RCVD: |11/21/01 - #COPIES:| CASE NO|A112-01 CASE NAME:~Bell Residence Stream Margin Review PLNR: 1 Flf e N I-F ,- - a vÂ·t PROJ ADDR:~ 17 Shady Lane CASE TYP:~Stream Margin Review STEPS:~ OWN/APP: Roaring Fork LLC. C ADR1300 Puppy Smith Stre C/S/Z: ~Aspen/CO/81611 PHN:~ REP:~Glenn Horn ADR:~215 S. Monarch St., st C/S/Z:IAspen/CO/81611 PHN~1925-6587 FEES DUE:~ 1205 D 180 E FEES RCVD:|1385 STAT: F REFERRALS~ REF:~ BY| DUE:~ MTG DATE REV BODY PH NOTICED 1 -/ | DATE OF FINAL ACTION:| CITY COUNCIL: REMARKS~ PZ: BOA: CLOSED: ~ *2*L BY: ~.-3-- l---1461 E DRAC: PLAT SUBMITD: ~ PLAT (BK,PG):~ ADMIN: \Al ;.121 d inu,/4 Stream Margin Review Standards: Regarding #3: 13 Trees are planned to be removed from the site. From attachment #13, it seems that some of the trees are outside the two envelopes. Does this comply with the standard? ESA Application Requirements: Regarding C.2.d: There does not seem to be a proposition of the construction techniques that will be used. Regarding C.3.a: Are the chimneys considered "rooftop equipment"? The elevation of the "mountain view plane" does not depict the chimneys of the proposed home. 2 95%4.3 E.J 4 \A , KJ g. We klws <24, Â·57-97 1/ e) - L â‚¬LÂ· 44 9 a f A Â£> I. 44_ .0.-c cLaâ‚¬5 49 cA- De 44~ A-> ev....r_lee.eâ‚¬ ibL_ 0 GC)iC35Â·.C i -Mc'c./A,S \6.-*.c Â«, C.-c_ s ic '72!râ€¢Â£56 "DIC .' C i ~ 1 \ 4 .F 11 L / 4- 9 , TUs c U.; \\ Â»ee , L Â«Pfau,_ ~ < 'L.. AL. Cc:v~ Dev Ot"C.~'ry-' \1 4 A-spen Consolidated Sanitation~~istrict Sy Kelly * Chairman John Keleher Paul Smith * T reas Frank Loushin Michael Kelly * Secy Bruce Matherly, Mgr February 11,2002 Fred Jarman Community Development 130 S, Galena Aspen, CO 81611 Re: 17 Shady Lane Stream Margin Review Dear Fred: The property located at 17 Shady Lane is currently served by Aspen Consolidated. The condition ofthe existing service line needs to be considered in order to determine if the service should be replaced. The applicant is encouraged to contact our line superintendent to help determine this. The location of new connections and the abandonment of existing service lines must be approved by our line superintendent, Tom Bracewell. The Landscaping Planting Plan (L 3-1) shows plantings on the District property that the applicant is proposing in order to create visual screen for the applicant' s property. We would like to have the proposed locations staked in order to evaluate the potential effect of the plantings upon our property, as well as the effect to the view plane from our property. Additional planting around the existing berm on our property will require sprint<ler improvements that must be included as part of the applicant' s costs. We would like the applicant to consider the addition of deciduous species as well as the coniferous species proposed. We would also like the city forester' s input on the suggested plantings, Please call ifyou have any questions. Sincerely, ,7 Bruce Matherly District Manager 565 N. Mill St.,Aspen, CO 81611 / (970)925-3601 / FAX (970) 925-2537 17 Shady Lane DRC Comments City of Aspen Natural Resource Management/Stephen Ellsperman/Brian Flynn 0 1. The City of Aspen is interested in obtaining a fisherman easement within the high water mark as outlined in the AACP an official Greenway Plan. The City has made this a requirement for multiple properties within the Roaring Fork Corridor at development periods. The fisherman corridor is becoming intact in many portions of the corridor throughout this particular area, making the river a true public resource. 2. The City of Aspen requires more information on the partially abandoned Harris Ditch as denoted on site plan Ll-1. Are there any current water rights holders on the ditch? Who controls the water access? Is the City a water right holder on the ditch? Will someone in the future utilize a ditch maintenance easement that will destroy restoration efforts? 3. There are no detailed design standards submitted for the stream margin protection barricades referenced in report. Where will this fencing be situated and by what means? How will this fencing "protect residual run-off an erosion"7 The City can provide specifications if needed. 4. Before any tree permits are issued for this project, pending approval, a follow up site visit needs to take place. The trees denoted on the report and site plan are indeed in declined condition and will most likely be approved for removal, however, preserving the root systems of other existing trees is of paramount importance and some of the construction and landscaping boundaries proposed will affect these sqme root zones. 5. Along with a stream margin barricade system, there also needs to be a upland native vegetation and tree protection fencing system installed. This will protect other areas on the property outside the stream margin from construction damage. There should be a location and standard for this fencing denoted on the plan. 6. The ecological report finding "no observed wetlands in the area" is misleading. There are jurisdictional wetlands within the area directly adjacent to the stream bed within the proposed restoration area. Although no proposed structures exist within a delineated wetland area, the restoration activities do. This work still needs to be identified as a project to the Sacramento District of the Corps of Engineers (Grand Junction). There is a "nationwide" administrative permit available for restoration activities which will preclude going forth with a full CofE 404 permit. 7. River Restoration Area General Comments The City of Aspen is excited by the prospect of having a portion of the Roaring Fork River Corridor restored during this project, yet has some concerns as to the process and the technical function of the design proposed. Riparian restoration is much more of a process than the planting of various plants within certain areas. It involves soil identification and management, studies of typical water flow (hydrogeomorphology), baseline botanical studies on existing herbaceous vegetation, identification of appropriate planting times, identification of appropriate planting methods, supplemental temporary irrigation requirements, temporary erosion control requirements, native seeding regimes for various of disturbed soil within the project. Most of these items are missing within the proposed plan. We realize that the applicant is making a wonderful effort to restore this portion of the river beyond what a normal redevelopment would include, vet we would require these above mentioned items before any final approval could be given for the project. We remain committed to assisting the applicant in any way possible including technical expertise and direction in order to propel the project towards approval. 8. Plant Material Comments Zone B (Ornamental) This portion of the landscape is reserved for obvious functional I dtr-LUL ornamental form than ecological restoration. In these cases we < 6,v/42 provide latitude to the LA to use different plant palettes to WL, .>L' . achieve the desired results. Oxeye Daisy is on the state registered noxious weed list. It is illegal to sell or plant in the state of Colorado. It must be removed from this list of plant materials. 9. Plant Material Comments Zone A Cornus sericea ... not Cornus stolonifera Mountain Nine Bark (P. opulifolis) is not native to this ~ ecotype. Nearest range is near Leadville - Prunus virginiana melanocarpa .. not Prunus virginiana - Ribes inerme .. (Wax Current) .. where it just says Ribes / - Symphoricarpos orephalus .. not Symphoricarpos alba (non- ~ Â©0 4* 1 j native) 0/2/2/ Again, these plants need to be placed on site within different hydrological zones. On the top of slope where this vegetation is proposed, permanent irrigation will need to be installed as these plant ~ materials are very hydric .. require a specification amount of moisture. ~ Larger plant materials existing on site have tapped into the water table. A blue spruce and a ponderosa pine have obvious initial water ~ requirements for establishment .. where do each of them fit into this ~ zone .. no real planting plan. 10. Plant Materials Comments Zone D and Zone E Each of these plant materials are native to this ecotype and will work well in certain configurations. The problem is their locations based upon the site plan will not work well as outlined. The Zone E plant materials have excellent survival potential .. yet for example S. acutus and S. pungens are found in submerged zones of still water at various depths. Although these plant materials are found along some portions of the riparian corridor, the ephemeral nature of the water precludes them in most areas. These plant materials would be extremely difficult to establish on this site. D. cespitosa is a much more tolerant wetland I 4 grammanoid which would be better to use in higher concentrations within this restoration plan. Rather than go into great detail about plant locations here .. City staff will assist in a follow up meeting about each individual plant chosen and appropriate locations and strategies. 11. Zone C Wildflower Sod Wildflower sod has been used with marginal success in the Aspen area. Invariably there are a few dominant plant materials which after a few years crowd out the weaker plant materials in the mix. This results in a monoculture of flowers in the landscape. Some of the individual plants within this wildflower sod are very aggressive and would not be appropriate along the river corridor. They are marked on the site plan comments. MEMORANDUM TO: Plans were routed to those departments checked-off below: City Engineer Zoning Officer Housing Director ............ Parks Department Aspen Fire Marshal ............. City Water Aspen Consolidated Sanitation District Building Department Environmental Health Electric Department Holy Cross Electric A Coold- City Attorney -f.li LAT<, i. ........... Streets Department Historic Preservation Officer 7 643 - Pitkin County Planning i. ........... County & City Disaster Coordinator FROM: Fred Jarman, Planner Community Development Department 130 S. Galena St.; Aspen, CO 81611 Phone-920.5102 Fax-920.5439 RE: 17 Shady Lane Stream Margin Review DATE: January 23,2002 DATE OF DRC MEETING: January 30,2002 REFERRAL SCHEDULE APPLICATION SENT OUT TO REFERRAL AGENCIES* January 23,2002 WRITTEN REFERRALS DUE February 11, 2002 Thank you, Fred m P. 1 1-04-1995 5:15AM FROM 44 C 1 4. / OU C- 2-/ 94/ I -- fkir LEGAL DESCRIPTION EXHIBIT "A" The following tract of land located in the NW'/1 SWK of Section 7,+Township 10 Soulh, Range 84 \Nest of the 6th PM. TRACT NO. 1 Beginning at Corner No 1, a pine post, whence the West 14 corner to Section 7, Township 10 South, Range 84 West of the 6th P.M., bears West 562.6 feet; U.S.L.M. Ute No. 4 bears S 28Â°04' E 3654.4 feet; ' thence East 376 teet thence South 200 feet : thence N 71Â°34' W 395.3 feet; I thence North 75 feet to place of beginning. Variation of 14Â°40' East. TRACT NO. 2 Beginnin4 at the Southeast Corner of tract described in Deed recoided in Book 49 at Page 12, Pitkin County Clerk and Recorder's Office (being also the Southeast Corner of Tract 1 above); thence South 125 fee!, more or less to the North Bank of the Roaring Fork River, thence Westerly along the North Bank of the Roaring Fork River 305 feet. more or less; thence North 150 feet, more or less, to the South line of said tract described in Book 49 at Pagâ‚¬ 12, Pitkin County Clerk and Recorder's OffiÂ« 1 thence S 71Â°34' E 341.3 feel lo the place ofbeginning. TRACT NO. 3 Beginning at a point whence the West 14 corner of Section 7, Township 10 South, Range 84 West of the fith P.M. bears North 200.0 feet, and West 938.6 feet, (the true point of triangular parcel of land more fully described as follows), thence Scutheastelly along the South right of way line of the County Road a distance of 300 feet to the intersection of said road with the North Bank of the Roaring Fork River; . 1 thence North'erly and Westerly along teh North Bank of the Roaring Fork River a distance o f 210.0 feet to the Southeast corner of that certain tract described in Book 49 at Page 57, Office of the Pitkin County Clerk and Recorder; thence North 125,0 feet to the point of beginning, being tile same property described upon Deed recorded in Book 177 at Page 128, Pilkin County Clerk and Recorder's Office. TRACT NO. 4 Beginning a,t a point whence the West M corner of Section 7, Township 10 South, Range 84 West of the 6th P.M, bears North' 175.06 feet and West 938.6 feet; thence S 44'29'24" E 159,10 feet, thence S 34Â°05'00" E 119,84 feet; thence S 52Â°30'00" W 52 feet more or less to the apparent mean high water line of the Rearing Fork River, thence N 32'06'24" W 258,90 feet, thence Notth 24.94 feet, Inore or less, to the point of beglonlng, EXCEPTING FROM THE ABOVE DESCRIBED PROPERTY THE FOLLOWING DESCRIBED PROPERTY: Beginning at a point whance the West 14 corner of Section 7, Township 10 South, Range 84 West of tile 6th P M. beats West 802.70 feet, thence East 63.49 feet; thence 58.48 feet along a curve to the left, whose radius is 153.33 feet, chord bears S 33Â°33'47" E 58,13 feet; thence S 44'29'24" E 57.48 Feet, ' thence South 85.62 feet to the point of beginning of Tract 3 as amended: thence N 44Â°29'24" W 11855 feet: thence 105.86 feet along a curve to the right whose radius is 213,33 feel, chord bears N 30Â°16'26" W 104.77 feet lo the point of beginning, ALSO EXCEPTING: Any portion of tile above described property lying and being within the D&RG railroad right of kvay C 7 16*19 1 r-4Â»3-6,) <PCâ‚¬ d.4-0, Fud L 1 6/914'ff 2 7Â» pÂ» 1 (10 1 k.)ba,-- G K.(1/,-4 /1- 1% MEMORANDUM TO: Fred Jarman, City Planner FROM: Sarah Oates, Zoning OfficerN-1 RE: 17 Shady Lane Stream Margin Review DATE: February 5,2002 17 Shady Lane is located in the R-30 PUD Zone District which has the following dimensional requirements: Setbacks: Front Yard - 25 feet Side Yard - 10 feet Rear -Yard - 15 feet As this is a corner lot, the applicant may chose which street the front yard is located on and the setback which aligns the other street is reduced by 1/3 of the front yard setback requirement. On the site and grading plan, L2-1, the applicant shows an architectural building envelope which does not accurately represent a building envelope or the setback requirements of the zone district. This lot is subject to setback requirements, and does not contain a designated building envelope, and therefore the applicant is subject to the Land Use Code requirements as it relates to development in a setback. The structure and landscape plans do appear to comply with the setback requirements, but this will be confirmed at the time of building permit submittal. The applicant will be required to submit a separate permit for the 6' high stone wall as required per the Land Use Code. Based on the information submitted by the applicant, the gross lot area is 93,653 square feet. After the exclusion of areas with a slope greater than 20% and the public right of way the net lot area is approximately 61,151 square feet, resulting in a permitted floor area for the parcel of 6823 square feet. Although the property is adjacent to the Roaring Fork River none of the property its appears to be within the high water line. Proposed floor area as well as lot area calculations will be verified when working drawings are submitted to the Building Department for building permit review. The drawings included in the application packet do not contain adequate detail for this level o f review. The applicant will be required to pay a Park Dedication Impact Fee for any additional bedrooms that are added. Also, the applicant will be required to pay cash-in-lieu or provide an ADU to obtain a GMQS exemption. Residential Design Standards Based on floor plans submitted to me in September 2001, the proposed dwelling unit met all of the required Residential Design Standards. At the time the floor plans were submitted there was a hand written note by the architect changing the front door entrance to the required 10' feet. Based on the application submitted for the Stream Margin Review and variance from the Residential Design Standards this has not been modified and will require a variance. Based on the floor plans submitted in September, the residence complies with the rest of the standards. Staff has allowed for a garage width of greater than 24' feet, as required in the Residential Design Standards, as the applicant is proposing a three car garage. During a meeting with the architect, staff made and interpretation that the third stall must be stepped back to break up the faga(le of the garage. Sufficient elevations have not been submitted for staff to determine compliance with all o f the Residential Design Standards. Compliance will be determined at the time of building permit submittal. Stream Margin Review Exterior lighting is required to meet Section 26.575.150 of the Land Use Code. Per the Section 26.575.150, the applicant is required to submit a lighting plan with the ESA review. Staff feels a lighting plan, with cut sheets, can be submitted at the time of building permit submittal. MEMORANDUM To: Joyce Ohlson, Deputy Director FROM: Fred Jarman, Planner F-6, App: l/U A l,ldeli-)4 RE: 17 Shady Lane Stream Margin Review / Residential Design Standard Variance DATE: February 19, 2002 -r -r. 1 - 111.11= #5 ' 527-â„¢-1.. 4 1 L"l' 5 k f 1 11 .2 , F., 12 . 6 1- let C 1 1 --~ r --7 144*i, f -flv v 1 'h LI- i~'. I "5*' m" 1/FI.,0 f *ff-1 1 710# 4 4, fiwilbil 1 1 1 **31 1 441. i VA,4/Fic 4-1 - flit,U 11 "9- 96,Â· i -Â¥Â»51 11: k b -4 -'*. -=Ill-fli~ I. ---- f t 'P, i 5< *4 b T: -1: 14 ~7- = :2: .C -- -- -- 1 - a 116 , J L 1 4- --1 1 1 '1:5, 4-1 .-IM'~/~ttl/4 11 <*L(EL -2,/ i - Aurr.- - 1-4*- - - - i.,â‚¬ -4- -& ./ I $ -P -r--t -- ~~- '6Â·~~~ O 1~1. _,- -6 M:m, 34-W .- , 1 '. -. - - -- -1 -11 it C Northeast view as seen from the footbridge on the Rio Grand Trail of tke - subject property. Applicant: Brad and Colleen Bell of Roaring Fork, LLC Representative: Davis Horn Inc. Zoning: R-30 PUD Lot Size: 93,653 sq. ft. Request Summary: The Applicant is requesting Stream Margin Review Approval and a variance from the Residential Design Standards for front door location. Staff Recommendation: > Staff recommends approval of the Stream Margin Review request with conditions, and > Staff recommends denial of the variance request from the Residential Design Standards. STAFF COMMENTS The Applicant is proposing to demolish an existing single-family dwelling built in 1958 and build a new single-family residence at a property known as 17 Shady Lane. Because this property is adjacent to the Roaring Fork River and its tributaries, it is subject to the City's Stream Margin Review provisions in the Land Use Code (hereinafter "Code"). In addition, the owner has produced a site-specific design for the proposed house that does not comply with one of the Code's Residential Design Standards regarding front door location. As a result, the Applicant has requested a variance from this standard. Staff has addressed these two requests in the text below. A. Stream Margin Review The Applicant has met all of the required standards regarding development in the Stream Margin with the exception of one standard regarding the provision of a required Administrative Nationwide Permit from the Sacramento District of the Army Corps of Engineers for restoration activity proposed for the water's edge. Staff has required the Applicant to acquire this permit and submit the permit to the Parks Department prior to the application for building permits. The Applicant is also proposing an extensive landscaping plan, which includes some regrading. These issues are discussed below. Landscape Plan As required by Stream Margin Review, the Applicant is required to submit a landscaping plan as well as establish a building envelope, which encloses the area where all development is to take place. While a building envelope has been established on the site plan, the Applicant also proposes considerable landscaping and limited restoration of a large portion of the site outside the building envelope. Staff has conducted a site visit with the Parks Department regarding this proposal, reviewed the proposed landscape plan, and is pleased with its restoration intent. The Parks Department approves of the proposed revegetation and restoration plan with a few modifications. The Parks Department also indicated that there would be certain tree removal mitigation required regarding the trees indicated on the site plan for "removal." They are also concerned with any disturbance in the riparian area closest to the riverbank. The Parks Department indicated, as is included as a condition of approval, that the Applicant shall obtain an administrative "Nationwide Permit" from the Sacramento District of the Army Corps of Engineers for any proposed vegetative reclamation occurring below the 100-year fiood plain. Further, the Parks Department will work with the Applicant throughout the project until its completion. Therefore, based on referral comments provided by the Parks Department following a site visit to the property, the Community Development Director has granted approval for the proposed plantings o f landscape materials outside o f the building envelope. Ultimately, the Parks and Community Development Departments recognize that the plan for this project and the wetland restoration is altogether an improvement to the current property. These improvements will be a benefit to the river corridor, the property, and the community as a whole. 2 Site Regrading As part of the site landscape plan, the Applicant proposes to regrade a small portion of the property. (See Site & Grading Plan, Sheet L2-1 in the plan set attached to this memorandum.) This sheet depicts current grade and proposed grade. The Applicant plans some regrading in an area just east of the proposed building envelope, which will result in an approximate 6-foot man-made berm on the property's edge. Berms are prohibited in the front yard setback pursuant to the Residential Design Standards (26.410.040(A)(3)). However, because the property is located on the corner of Shady Lane and Red Mountain Road, the Applicant may choose which street the front yard is located on and the setback, which aligns the other street, is reduced by 1/3 of the front yard setback, pursuant to Section 26.575.040(C) of the Code. As a result, for setback purposes, the Applicant has chosen Shady Lane as the front yard setback and is therefore allowed to have a berm as proposed in the side yard setback. The City Zoning Officer has confirmed this request and applicable referral comments have been included as Exhibit B to this memorandum.) B. Residential Design Standard Variance Request The Applicant has provided a design that meets all but one of the Residential Design Standards: front door location. As a result, the Applicant is seeking a variance from this standard. A brief discussion of the requested variance is as follows. Front Door Location The design standards require that the front door shall be no further than 10 feet back from % the front most wall of a house. (This is illustrated in the rendering to the right.) The Applicant has designed a house that has the front door situated 16' 6" back from the front most wall of the house, which requires a 6'6" t~3~ 1110~11~'pke .. 49* variance. Staff finds that this variance is 10, 1/4 requested due to a design preference and does . --9 not meet one of the three standards for which ~ ~ the Applicant would have to meet to justify the variance request. The standards are as follows: a) Yield greater compliance with the goals of the Aspen Area Community Plan; Staff finds that designing the main entrance door an additional 6'6" back from the front most wall of the house does not yield greater compliance with the goals of the AACP. The intent of this standard is to ensure that each residential building has street-facing architectural details and elements that provide human scale to the facade, enhance the walking experience, and reinforce local building traditions. By placing the door even further back from the street, Staff finds that this reduces rather than enhances the walking experience discussed in the intent. As such, the Residential Design Standards were drafted in part to further the goals of the AACP to ensure quality design as an important contribution to the community fabric. Staff finds this standard is not met. 3 b) More effectively address the issue or problem a given standard or provision responds to; or Staff finds that designing the main entrance door an additional 6'6" back from the standard does not more effectively address the issue or problem a given standard or provision responds to. In fact, this receded entrance design further diminishing the street- facing architectural details and elements, which are supposed to provide for a human scale to the facade, enhance the walking experience, and reinforce local building traditions. Staff finds this standard is not met. c) Be clearly necessary for reasons of fairness related to unusual site specific constraints; Through a Stream Margin Review, the Applicant is able to set a building envelope as well as choose which yard is the front yard because the property is on a corner. The site provides a considerable area for development back from the top of slope area. Staff finds that there are no site specific constrains that warrant a variance from this standard. The Applicant can easily design a front door that easily complies with this standard. Staff finds this standard is not met. STAFF RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends the Planning and Zoning Commission approve this Stream Margin Review with conditions listed in the resolution. Staff recommends the Planning and Zoning Commission deny the requested variance from the Residential Design Standards for failure to meet any one of the three standards. Please note, for your convenience, Staff drafted two separate resolutions (one for the Stream Margin Review and one for the requested variances from the Residential Design Standards). Therefore, separate votes are required for each resolution. RECOMMENDED MOTION FOR STREAM MARGIN REVIEW REOUEST "I move to approve Resolution No. , Series of 2002, approving a Stream Margin Review request for a property located at 17 Shady Lane, City of Aspen, Colorado. RECOMMENDED MOTION FOR STREAM MARGIN REVIEW REQUEST "I move to approve Resolution No. , Series of 2002, approving a variance from the front door location standards (26.410.040(D)(1)(a) of the Residential Design Standards for a property located at 17 Shady Lane, City of Aspen, Colorado. ATTACHMENTS Exhibit A -- Review Criteria & Staff Findings Exhibit B -- Zoning Officer Comments Exhibit C -- Parks Department Referral Comments Exhibit D -- Application 4 Stream Margin Review Resolution No. (SERIES OF 2002) RESOLUTION OF THE ASPEN PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION APPROVING A STREAM MARGIN REVIEW FOR A PROPERTY LOCATED AT 17 SHADY LANE, CITY OF ASPEN, PITKIN COUNTY, COLORADO. Parcel No. 2737-782-85-003/005 WHEREAS, the Community Development Department received an application from Brad and Colleen Bell of Roaring Fork, LLC, represented by Davis Horn Inc., requesting Stream Margin Review approval for a property located at 17 Shady Lane in the City of Aspen. WHEREAS, the applicant's property is an 93,653 sq. ft. lot located in the R-30 PUD Zone District and in an Environmentally Sensitive Area as defined by the Land Use Code; and WHEREAS, the Community Development Department Staff reviewed the Application for compliance with the Stream Margin Review Standards; and WHEREAS, the City Zoning Officer, the City Engineer, the Parks Department, Aspen Consolidated Sanitation District, and the City Fire Department reviewed the development proposal for 17 Shady Lane and provided written referral comments as a result of the Development Review Committee meeting; and WHEREAS, upon review of the application, referral comments, site visits, and the applicable Land Use Code standards, the Community Development Director recommended approval of the Steam Margin Review with conditions; and WHEREAS, the Aspen Planning and Zoning Commission has reviewed and considered the development proposal under the applicable provisions of the Municipal Code as identified herein, has reviewed and considered the recommendation of the Community Development Director, the applicable referral agencies, and has taken and considered public comment at a public hearing; and WHEREAS, the City of Aspen Planning and Zoning Commission finds that the development proposal meets or exceeds all applicable development standards and that the approval of the development proposal, with conditions, is consistent with the goals and elements ofthe Aspen Area Community Plan; and WHEREAS, the Planning and Zoning Commission approves the Stream Margin Review request, by a vote of to C - 3, and WHEREAS, the City of Aspen Planning and Zoning Commission finds that this Resolution furthers and is necessary for the promotion ofpublic health, safety, and welfare. NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED by the Commission: Section 1 Pursuant to the procedures and standards set forth in Title 26 of the Aspen Municipal Code, the Planning and Zoning Commission hereby approves the Stream Margin Review request for 17 Shady Lane with the following conditions: 1) The Applicant shall obtain a "Nationwide Permit" from the Sacramento District of the Army Corps of Engineers for any proposed restoration activities within the jurisdictional wetlands as identified by the City of Aspen Parks Department. The Applicant shall present this permit to the Parks Department prior to the application for building permits, any proposed landscaping work, and as a condition of the tree removal permit issuance. 2) The Applicant shall be required to submit a new landscaping plan to the City Parks Department that specifically depicts "barricades" that are intended to serve as barriers to protect run-off into the river during reconstruction. 3) The Applicant shall provide tree protection fencing in the form of Chain Link Panel Fencing around the drip line of all vegetation to be saved on site. The Applicant shall call the City Forester for an inspection of this fencing before any construction activities begin. No excavation, storage of materials, or any other use will occur within this zone during construction activities. 4) The Applicant shall place construction and silt protection fencing along the Stream Margin area for protection of the Roaring Fork River corridor before any construction activities are to begin. The Applicant shall submit a detailed riparian fencing plan detailing the protected area along the riverbank prior to the application of building permits. City Forester must be called for an inspection before any construction activities begin. 5) The Applicant shall submit a corrected plat prior to recordation for review to the Community Development Director indicating a corrected building envelope to reflect the city setback requirements for the non-riparian sides as defined by the City Zoning O ffi cer. In addition, the Applicant shall include a plat note on the final plat to be recorded that defines the "landscape building envelope" as "an area that shall only contain approved landscaping materials as reviewed and approved by the City Parks Department." Section 2 This resolution shall not effect any existing litigation and shall not operate as an abatement of any action or proceeding now pending under or by virtue of the ordinances repealed or amended as herein provided, and the same shall be conducted and concluded under such prior ordinances. Section 3 If any section, subsection, sentence, clause, phrase, or portion of this Resolution is for any reason held invalid or unconstitutional in a court of competent jurisdiction, such portion shall be deemed a separate, distinct and independent provision and shall not affect the validity of the remaining portions thereof. 6 Section 4 All material representations and commitments made by the Applicant pursuant to the development proposal approvals as herein awarded, whether in public hearing or documentation presented before the Planning and Zoning Commission, are hereby incorporated in such plan development approvals and the same shall be complied with as if fully set forth herein, unless amended by an authorized entity. APPROVED by the Commission at its regular meeting on February 19,2002. APPROVED AS TO FORM: PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION: City Attorney Jasmine Tygre, Chair ATTEST: Jackie Lothian, Deputy City Clerk 7 Variance from Residential Design Standards Resolution No. (SERIES OF 2002) RESOLUTION OF THE ASPEN PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION APPROVING RESIDENTIAL DESIGN STANDARD VARIANCE FOR SECTION 26.410.040(D)(1)(a), FRONT DOOR LOCATION, FOR A PROPERTY LOCATED AT 17 SHADY LANE, CITY OF ASPEN, PITKIN COUNTY, COLORADO. Parcel No. 2737-782-85-003/005 WHEREAS, the Community Development Department received an application from Brad and Colleen Bell of Roaring Fork, LLC, represented by Davis Horn Inc., seeking a variance from Residential Design Standard 26.410.040(D)(1)(a) Front Door Location for a property located at 17 Shady Lane in the City of Aspen. WHEREAS, the applicant's property is an 93,653 sq. ft. lot with an existing single- family residence and located in the R-30 PUD Zone District; and WHEREAS, Section 26.410.020(C) of the Aspen Municipal Code provides that if an application is found by Community Development Department Staff to be inconsistent with any item of the Residential Design Guidelines, the Applicant may either amend the application or appeal Staff's findings to the Design Review Appeal Committee (DRAC) pursuant to Chapter 26.222, Design Review Appeal Committee; and WHEREAS, pursuant to Chapter 26.410 and 26.212, the Planning and Zoning Commission has the authority to hear variances from the Residential Design Standards; and WHEREAS, all applications for appeal from the Residential Design Standards of Section 26.410.040 must meet one of the following review standards in order for the Planning and Zoning Commission to grant an exception, namely the proposal must: a) Yield greater compliance with the goals of the Aspen Area Community Plan; b) More effectively address the issue or problem a given standard or provision responds to; or d) Be clearly necessary for reasons of fairness related to unusual site specific constraints; WHEREAS, upon review of the application, referral comments, and the applicable Land Use Code standards, the Community Development Director finds the requested variance does not meet any one of the aforementioned standards and recommends denial of the requested variance from the Residential Design Standards; and WHEREAS, the Aspen Planning and Zoning Commission has reviewed and considered the development proposal under the applicable provisions of the Municipal Code as identified herein, has reviewed and considered the recommendation of the Community Development Director, the applicable referral agencies, and has taken and considered public comment at a public hearing; and WHEREAS, the City of Aspen Planning and Zoning Commission finds that the development proposal meets or exceeds all applicable development standards and that the 8 approval of the development proposal, with conditions, is consistent with the goals and elements ofthe Aspen Area Community Plan; and WHEREAS, during a duly noticed public hearing at a regular meeting on February 19,2002, the Planning and Zoning Commission approves a variance from Residential Design Standard 26.410.040(D)(1)(a) Front Door Location by a vote of to 03. WHEREAS, the City of Aspen Planning and Zoning Commission finds that this Resolution furthers and is necessary for the promotion ofpublic health, safety, and welfare. NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED by the Commission: Section 1 Pursuant to the procedures and standards set forth in Title 26 of the Aspen Municipal Code, the request for a variance from Residential Design Standard 26.410.040(D)(1)(a) Front Door Location is approved by the Planning and Zoning Commission. Section 2 All material representations and commitments made by the Applicant pursuant to the development proposal approvals as herein awarded, whether in public hearing or documentation presented before the Planning and Zoning Commission are hereby incorporated in such plan development approvals and the same shall be complied with as if fully set forth herein, unless amended by an authorized entity. Section 3 This resolution shall not effect any existing litigation and shall not operate as an abatement of any action or proceeding now pending under or by virtue o f the ordinances repealed or amended as herein provided, and the same shall be conducted and concluded under such prior ordinances. Section 4 If any section, subsection, sentence, clause, phrase, or portion of this resolution is for any reason held invalid or unconstitutional in a court of competent jurisdiction, such portion shall be deemed a separate, distinct and independent provision and shall not affect the validity of the remaining portions thereof. APPROVED by the Commission at its regular meeting on February 19, 2002. APPROVED AS TO FORM: PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION: City Attorney Jasmine Tygre, Chair ATTEST: Jackie Lothian, Deputy City Clerk 9 EXHIBIT A REVIEW CRITERIA & STAFF FINDINGS A. STREAM MARGIN REVIEW STANDARDS The proposed development is located within an environmentally sensitive area described as a Stream Margin and is subject to Stream Margin Review Standards. No development shall be permitted within the Stream Margin unless the Planning and Zoning Commission makes a determination that the proposed development complies with all requirements set forth below: 1. It can be demonstrated that any proposed development, which is in the Special Flood Hazard Area, will not increase the base flood elevation on the parcel proposed for development. This shall be demonstrated by an engineering study prepared by a professional engineer registered to practice in the State of Colorado which shows that the base flood elevation will not be raised, including, but not limited to, proposing mitigation techniques on or off-site which compensate for any base flood elevation increase caused by the development. Staff Finding Staff finds that the proposed development consists of a single family residence to be constructed entirely within an established building envelope which is located on a developable portion of the lot which is not located in the Special Flood Hazard Area and in no way will increase the base flood elevation on the parcel proposed for development. Staff finds this standard to be met. 2. The recommendations of the Aspen Area Community Plan: Parks/Recreation/Open Space/Trails Plan and the Roaring Fork River Greenway Plan are implemented in the proposed plan for development, to the greatest extent practicable. Areas of historic public use or access shall be dedicated via a recorded easement for public use. A fisherman's easement granting public fishing access within the high water boundaries of the river course shall be granted via a recorded "Fisherman's Easement." Staff Finding Staff finds that this proposal is directly consistent with Goal E "Protect and enhance the natural environment," in the Aspen Area Community Plan (AACP). Partly, the intent of the Parks, Open Space, and the Environment chapter of the AACP states, "preserve, enhance and restore the natural beauty of the environment of the Aspen area." Staff finds that the Applicant has proposed a restoration plan that includes restoring portions of the river bank with proper native plantings that will help shade and cool summer water temperatures as well as provide for protective habitat for certain aquatic species. The Parks Department has reviewed and commented on the proposed revegetation and restoration plans and is encourage by the Applicant's proposal. Staff finds this standard to be met. 3. There is no vegetation removed or damaged or slope grade changes (cut or fill) made outside of a specifically defined building envelope. A building envelope shall be designated by this review and said envelope shall be barricaded prior to issuance of any demolition, excavation or building permits. The barricades shall remain in place until the issuance of Certificates of Occupancy. Staff Finding The Applicant proposes to remove 13 trees from the property. During a site visit to the property, Staff from the Parks Department indicated that there will be some mitigation required for some trees proposed to be removed while others are in a very poor state of health and should be removed. The Applicant will have to apply for a tree removal permit for this activity prior to the application for building permits. The Applicant proposes 5 different zones of landscaping on the property. The first four zones, zones A through D, are proposed for the upland portions of the lot and the fifth zone specifically outlines three areas for "native bank restoration at the water's edge." The Parks Department has commented on the plan and believes the plan to be a good effort on the part of the Applicant and has only recommended minor changes to the plan regarding the location and types for species that would be more effective and the removal of some species that are invasive. Staff has required, as a condition of approval, the Applicant receive approval from the Parks Department on a "final landscaping plan" prior to the application for building pennits. Also, the Applicant shall be required to specifically depict "barricades" on the landscape plan that are intended to serve as barriers to protect run-off into the river during reconstruction. Staff has also required the Applicant shall provide tree protection fencing in the form of Chain Link Panel Fencing around the drip line of all vegetation to be saved on site. The Applicant shall call the City Forester for an inspection of this fencing before any construction activities begin. No excavation, storage of materials, or any other use will occur within this zone during construction activities. The Applicant proposes some minor regrading of the site outside of the building envelope in conjunction with the revegetation with appropriate species. Staff discussed this issue and felt the Applicant could expand the building envelope to contain the areas where regrading was to take place as part of the landscaping / restoration plan. However, Staff believes that establishing a "Landscape Building Envelope" which is defined to contain only landscaping and the proposed regrading that shall take place 15' back from the top of slope area and specifically approved by the Parks Department would be appropriate. 4. The proposed development does not pollute or interfere with the natural changes of the river, stream or other tributary, including erosion and/or sedimentation during construction. Increased on-site drainage shall be accommodated within the parcel to prevent entry into the river or onto its banks. Pools or hot tubs cannot be drained outside of the designated building envelope. Staff Finding The proposed development itself will not pollute or interfere with the natural changes of the river. The Applicant shall be required, as a condition of approval to place Construction and Silt Protection Fencing along the Stream Margin area for protection of the Roaring Fork River Corridor before any construction activities are to begin. The Applicant shall submit a detailed riparian fencing plan detailing the protected area along the riverbank prior to the application for building permits to the City Parks Department for review. City Forester must be called for an inspection before any construction activities begin. The Applicant acknowledges that pools or hot tubs cannot be drained outside of the designated building envelope. Staff finds this standard to be met. 11 5. Written notice is given to the Colorado Water Conservation Board prior to any alteration or relocation of a watercourse, and a copy of said notice is submitted to the Federal Emergency Management Agency. Staff Finding The Applicant is not proposing to alter the watercourse in any way. Staff finds this standard to be met. 6. A guarantee is provided in the event a watercourse is altered or relocated, that applies to the developer and his heirs, successors and assigns that ensures that the flood carrying capacity on the parcel is not diminished. Staff Finding The Applicant is not proposing to alter the watercourse in any way. All structural development will be restricted to the proposed building envelope and the proposed site revegetation plan and riparian enhancement will not alter the river's watercourse. Staff finds this standard to be met. 7. Copies are provided of all necessary federal and state permits relating to work within the one-hundred-year floodplain. Staff Finding Staff finds that as a result of the proposed bank restoration with native plantings at the water's edge, the Applicant shall be required to ascertain a "Nationwide Permit" from the Sacramento District of the Army Corps of Engineers for any proposed restoration activities within the jurisdictional wetlands as identified by the City of Aspen Parks Department. The Applicant shall present this permit to the Parks Department prior to the application for building permits and any proposed landscaping work, and as a condition of the tree removal permit issuance. Staff finds this standard to be met. 8. There is no development other than approved native vegetation planting taking place below the top of slope or within fifteen (15) feet of the top of slope or the high waterline, whichever is most restrictive. This is an effort to protect the existing riparian vegetation and bank stability. (See Figure "A" below for illustrative purposes). Staff Finding The Applicant is proposing native wetland plant enhancement below the top of slope. All other upland revegetation shall take place above the top of slope line depicted on the development plan. Staff finds this standard to be met. 9. All development outside the fifteen (15) foot setback from the top of slope does not exceed a height delineated by a line drawn at a forty-five (45) degree angle from ground level at the top of slope. Height shall be measured and determined by the Community Development Director using the definition for height set forth at Section 26.04.100 and method of calculating height set forth at Section 26.575.020 (See Figure "A" below for illustrative purposes). 12 Staff Finding The Applicant has designed a building envelope that is set 15 feet back from the top of slope that has been verified by the City Engineering Department. The applicant has also provided a "profile sheet" as shown by Attachment 9 in the Application plan set that shows the proposed house is located back from a line drawn at a forty-five (45) degree angle from ground level at the top of slope. Staff finds this standard to be met. 10. A landscape plan is submitted with all development applications. Such plan shall limit new plantings (including trees, shrubs, flowers, and grasses) outside of the designated building envelope on the river side to native riparian vegetation. Staff Finding The Applicant has provided a detailed landscape plan that shows where the upland revegetation and bank enhancement is to take place. The plan also provides detailed information regarding the species and location of the proposed plantings in five (5) "zones" as discussed earlier. The Parks Department has provided detailed comments, which are attached to this memorandum, and the Community Development Director has approved of this planting outside of the established building envelope. Staff has attached a series of conditions of approval ensuring that the Applicant shall conduct this restoration under the close supervision and direction of the Parks Department. Ultimately, the Parks and Community Development Departments recognize that the plan for this project and the wetland restoration is altogether an improvement to the current property. These improvements will be a benefit to the river corridor, the property, and the community as a whole. Staff finds this standard to be met. 11. All exterior lighting is low and downcast with no light(s) directed toward the river or located down the slope and shall be in compliance with section 26.575.150. Staff Finding The Applicant has committed to comply with the City of Aspen Outdoor Lighting Ordinance and that all exterior lighting is low and downcast with no light(s) directed toward the river or located down the slope. The City Zoning Officer has concluded that the Applicant may provide a lighting plan and cut sheets can be submitted at the time of building permit submittal. This has been included as a condition of approval. Staff finds this standard to be met. 12. Site sections drawn by a registered architect, landscape architect, or engineer are submitted showing all existing and proposed site elements, the top of slope, and pertinent elevations above sea level. Staff Finding The Applicant has provided site sections showing all existing and proposed site elements, the top of slope, and pertinent elevations above sea level. These are attached to the application in the plan sets. In addition, the City of Aspen Engineering Department has verified the top of slope for this property. Staff finds this standard to be met. 13 13. There has been accurate identification of wetlands and riparian zones. (Ord. No. 47- 1999, Â§3) Staff Finding The Applicant has provided a letter from Andrew Antipas Ecological & Environmental Consulting, LLC that concluded that upon a site visit to the property on November 7, 2001, that the proposed development was consistent with the Steam margin review criteria. This report further defined that the property had been somewhat cleared of historic understory and that all that was left on the upland portions o f the property included very mature and in some cases ailing cottonwood trees. The report indicated that no wetlands were observed in the project area. The Parks Department found that this comment was misleading, in that, there are jurisdictional wetlands in the area directly adjacent to the streambed within the proposed restoration area. Although no proposed structures exist within a delineated wetland area, the restoration activities do. As such, the Parks Department has required the Applicant to acquire an administrative "Nationwide Permit" form the Sacramento District of the Army Cops of Engineers. Staff finds that this standard to be met. B. RESIDENTIAL DESIGN STANDARDS The Applicant is proposing a design for the single-family structure that has the front door a full 16'6" back from the front most wall of the house. This conflicts with the Residential Design Standards. As such the Applicant has chosen to request a variance from the standard. In order to grant a variance from this standard, the Commission must find that the proposed design meets at least one ofthe following standards: A. Yield greater compliance with the goals of the Aspen Area Community Plan. B. More effectively address the issue or problem a given standard or provision responds to, or C. Be clearly necessary for reasons of fairness related to unusual site-specific constraints. Staff Comments The intent of the following building elements standards is to ensure that each residential building has street-facing architectural details and elements, which provide human scale to the facade, enhance the walking experience, and reinforce local building traditions. The Applicant's design on the single-family dwelling meets all the residential design standards except the following standard below, which is illustrated by the graphic to the right. a. The entry door shall face the street and be no more than ten feet (10') back from the frontmost MC wall of the building. Â«fÂ» Staff Finding: The Applicant is proposing a design that places the main entry door 16'6" back from the frontmost wall of the building as can be seen on "Attachment 8" in - ~~ the application that illustrates the main floor plan - v~- for the dwelling. As a result, the Applicant is requesting a 6'6" variance from this standard. 14 4 52-"92 The intent of this standard is to ensure that each residential building has street-facing architectural details and elements, which provide human scale to the facade, enhance the walking experience, and reinforce local building traditions. Staff finds that since this house will be located on a very prominent trail, the "Rio Grand Trail", and Shady Lane, which serves as an access way from Red Mountain Road to the Rio Grand Trail, that this standard should be met so as to enhance the pedestrian experience. Staff finds the proposed design does not meet any one of the standards required for a variance to be granted. Staff has provided a response to those standards below. A. Yield greater compliance with the goals of the Aspen Area Community Plan; Staff Finding: Staff finds that designing the main entrance door an additional 6'6" back from the front most wall of the house does not yield greater compliance with the goals of the AACP. The intent of this standard is to ensure that each residential building has street-facing architectural details and elements that provide human scale to the facade, enhance the walking experience, and reinforce local building traditions. By placing the door even further back from the street, Staff finds that this reduces rather than enhances the walking experience discussed in the intent. As such, the Residential Design Standards were drafted, in part, to further the goals of the AACP to ensure quality design as an important contribution to the community fabric. Staff finds this standard is not met. B. More effectively address the issue or problem a given standard or provision responds to; or Staff Finding: Staff finds that designing the main entrance door an additional 6'6" back from the standard does not more effectively address the issue or problem a given standard or provision responds to. In fact, this receded entrance design further diminishing the street-facing architectural details and elements, which are supposed to provide for a human scale to the facade, enhance the walking experience, and reinforce local building traditions. Staff finds this standard is not met. C. Be clearly necessary for reasons of fairness related to unusual site specific constraints; Staff Finding: The property is located in an area of the Roaring Fork River and its tributary streams. As such, there are areas of the property that are simply not suitable for development, as they would most certainly impact an environmentally sensitive area. Even with these off-limit riparian areas, the site provides a considerable area for development back from the top of slope area. Staff finds that there are no site-specific constraints that warrant a variance from this standard that has required the design to incorporate a door 6'6" back from the standard. The Applicant can easily design a front door that complies with this standard. Staff finds this standard is not met. 15 4 Davis Hornlus. PLANNING & REAL ESTATE CONSULTING ------ November 20,2001 James Lindt Aspen Pitkin Community Development Department 130 South Galena Street Aspen, Colorado 81611 Re: Roaring Fork LLC Stream Margin Review Dear James: Davis Horn Incorporated represent Brad and Colleen Bell of Roaring Fork LLC (hereinafter referred to as "applicant"), the owners of a property at the corner of Shady Lane and Red Mountain Road in Aspen. The Bells intend to tear down the existing dwelling on the property and are seeking approval to build a new single family residence. This letter requests approval for Stream Margin Review and one Residential Design Review exemption for the proposed residence pursuant to Sections 26.435.040 and 26.222 ofthe Aspen Land Use Regulations. This letter describes the existing conditions on the subject property, the proposed development and demonstrates compliance with the applicable regulations in the land use code. Existing Conditions The subject site is located on the corner of Shady Lane and Red Mountain Road, the first left turn off Red Mountain Road after the Mill Street bridge. See the Vicinity Map in Attachment 1. The property is on the fringe of the urban area with several large lot suburban homes adjacent and nearby including the Rowland, Hines, Duncan and Friedberg residences. The Common Grounds co-housing complex is across Red Mountain Road to the north and the Aspen Consolidated Sanitation District employee housing project is to the south across the Roaring Fork River. Attachment 2 is an Existing Conditions survey of the subject site which shows the existing house to be demolished, topography, the 100 year floodplain, the mean high water line and the top of slope. The top of slope is defined by the Aspen Land Use Regulations and is based upon the drawing in Attachment 3 which was submitted to and approved by Richard Goulding, City of Aspen Project Engineer. Attachment 4 is Goulding's letter dated March 16, 2001 approving the location ofthe top of slope. Also shown on the Existing Conditions survey is the 15 foot setback from the approved top of slope and the 100 foot setback from the high water line. The area within the 100 foot setback from the high water line is the area pertinent in the Stream Margin Review. ALICE DAVIS, AICP I GLENN HORN, AICP 215 SOUTH MONARCH SL Â· SUITE 104 Â· ASPEN, COLORADO 81611 Â· 970/925-6587 Â· FAX: 970/925-5180 / . Attachment 5 is a slope analysis ofthe subject property. The drawing shows that ofthe total 93,653 square foot property, 26,870 square feet of the land contains slopes greater than 30% while 3,570 square feet contains slopes between 20% and 30%. The site is generally flat with the steeper areas on the peripheries of the property such as along the stream bank and the bank dropping down from Red Mountain Road and Shady Lane. Proposed Development The applicant proposes to demolish the existing home on the property and build a new single family residence. The new building and landscape improvements will be outside the 100 year flood plain. A picture of a model of the proposed house designed by Cottle Graybeal Yaw Architects is shown in Attachment 6. The northeast Entrance Elevation, the northwest Shady Lane Elevation and the southwest Rio Grande Bridge Elevation are given in Attachment 7. The main level floor plan is depicted in Attachment 8. A site section showing the progressive height has been met is given in Attachment 9 The following is a guide to the drawings by Design Workshop, Landscape Architects, found in Attachments 2, and 10 through 13. Attachment 2 - Existing Conditions; Attachment 10- Site and Grading Plan; Attachment 11- Landscaping Planting Plan: Attachment 12- Site Sections; and Attachment 13 - Site Mitigation. Stream Margin Review This section of the application demonstrates compliance with the Stream Margin Review requirements, Section 26.435.040 ofthe Aspen Land Use Regulations. Each ofthe standards appear in bold followed by the applicant's responses. 1. It can be demonstrated that any proposed development which is in the Special Flood Hazard Area will not increase the base nood elevation on the parcel proposed for development. This shall be demonstrated by an engineering study prepared by a professional engineer registered to practice in the State of Colorado which shows that the base flood elevation will not be raised, including, but not limited to, proposing mitigation techniques on or off-site which compensate for any base flood elevation increase caused by the development; There is no development proposed with the Special Flood Hazard Area, also known as the 100 year floodplain. The 100 year floodplain (Special Flood Hazard Area) is shown on 2 --r Attachment 2 and roughly follows the top ofbank. 2. The recommendations of the Aspen Area Community Plan: Parks/Recreation/Open Space/Trails Plan and the Roaring Fork Greenway Plan are implemented in the proposed plan for development, to the greatest extent practicable. Areas of historic public use or access shall be dedicated via a recorded easement for public use. A fisherman's easement granting public fishing access within the high water boundaries of the river course shall be granted via a recorded "Fisherman's Easement"; The Aspen Area Community Plan: Parks/Recreation/Open Space/Trails Plans show the existing trail located across the Roaring Fork River from the subject as part of the Rio Grande trail system. Trails and public trail access are excellent in and around the subject property. This land use application is consistent with the recommendations ofthe Roaring Fork Greenway Plan and landscaping will be consistent with the Plan recommendations. A Fisherman's Easement should not be necessary as the Roaring Fork River is heavily used and easily accessed at several different points nearby. 3. There is no vegetation removed or damaged or slope grade changes (cut or fill) made outside of a specifically defined envelope. A building envelope shall be designated by this review and said envelope shall be barricaded prior to the issuance of any demolition excavation or building permits. The barricades shall remain in place until the issuance of Certificates of Occupancy; As shown in Attachment 11, the Landscape Planting Plan, the applicant has designated an architectural building envelope within which all buildings will be located and a landscape building envelope where planting, grass and hardscape improvements will be located. Both envelopes are located out ofthe 100 year floodplain. The applicant will diligently protect the stream bank during construction. A barricade will be erected on the south side of the architectural and landscape building envelopes as they are depicted in Attachment 11. The barricade protecting the stream bank shall not be removed until a certificate of occupancy is issued for the project. No vegetation will be removed or damaged and no slope grade changes (cut or fill) will occur outside the two building envelopes. Zones "D", "E" and "F" on the Landscape Planting Plan are on the south side of the architectural and landscape building envelopes. Work in these zones will involve native wetland plant enhancement and will provide bank stabilization. There is no existing wetland vegetation within the building envelope and outside the building envelopes, only enhancement will occur. Attachment 13, Stream Margin Review Site Mitigation, illustrates the applicant's proposal to remove 13 existing trees. Only one ofthe thirteen trees is healthy. The other twelve are in decline and two of the twelve are in serious decline and are a safety hazard. Stephen Ellsperman of the City of Aspen Parks Department visited the subject site with 3 the applicant' s landscape architect and observed the cottonwood trees on the site and seemed to agree with their declining condition. 4. The proposed development does not pollute or interfere with the natural changes of the river, stream or other tributary, including erosion and or/sedimentation during construction. Increased on-site drainage shall be accommodated within the parcel to prevent entry into the river or onto its banks. Pools or hot tubs cannot be drained outside of the designated envelope; The proposed development is adequately setback from the river to avoid interference with the natural changes of the river. During construction, the barricade on the south side of the building envelope will be utilized to protect the river bank and river during construction. Any increased on-site drainage will be accommodated onsite to prevent entry into the river or onto its banks. Any pools or hot tubs will not be drained outside of the designated building envelope. 5. Written notice is given to the Colorado Water Conservation Board prior to any alteration or relocation of a water course, and a copy of said notice is submitted to the Federal Emergency Management Agency; There will not be any alteration of the water course. Therefore, the applicant has not notified the Colorado Water Conservation Board. 6. A guarantee is provided in the event a water course is altered or relocated, that applies to the developer and his heirs, successors and assigns that ensures that the flood carrying capacity on the parcel is not diminished; There is adequate room on the property to assure that the water course will not be altered or relocated by the applicant or heirs. All disturbance will be restricted to the designated building envelopes, therefore a guarantee is not needed. 7. Copies are provided of all necessary federal and state permits relating to work within the one hundred (100) year iloodplain; No work will be performed within the 100 year floodplain except for native wetland plant 43 / 9. enhancement. The applicant will obtain any federal or state permits if any are required and Al ri i copies will be provided. 8. There is no development other than approved native vegetation planting taking place below the top of the slope or within fifteen (15) feet of the top of the slope or the high waterline, whichever is most restrictive. This is an effort to protect the existing riparian vegetation and bank stability. (See Figure "A" below for illustrative purposes.); 4 No development other than native wetland plant enhancement will take place below the top of slope or within 15 feet of the top of slope. Please refer to Attachment 3, the map showing the top of slope approved by Richard Goulding of the City of Aspen Engineering Department and the mean high water line. Attachment 11 is the Landscape Planting Plan which shows the proposed landscaping in relation to the top of slope. 9. All development outside the fifteen (15) foot setback from the top of the slope does not exceed a height delineated by a line drawn at a forty-five (45) degree angle from ground level at the top of the slope. Height shall be measured and determined by the Community Development Director using the definition for height set forth at Section 26.104.100 and method of calculating height set forth at Section 26.575.020 (See Figure "A" below for illustrative purposes); Attachment 9 shows the required progressive height limit defined above. The proposed home, located outside the 15 foot setback from the approved top of slope, will not exceed the height delineated by the progressive height limit line. All new construction on the site will comply with this restriction. 10. A landscaping plan is submitted with all development applications. Such plan shall limit new plantings (including trees, shrubs, flowers and grasses) outside of the designated building envelope on the river side to native riparian vegetation; Attachment 11, the Landscape Planting Plan, shows the proposed vegetation to be planted in four different landscape zones. This Attachment includes the plantings' scientific name, common name, wetland status, height and other information on the various plants proposed. Briefly, Zone A includes bank upland restoration above the top of slope, Zone B includes ornamental native plants to be located around the home, Zone C includes a wildflower seed mix to be used in upland stream margins, Zone D includes bank wetland restoration below the top of slope, Zone E consists of bank restoration plants at the water's edge and Zone F consists ofa seed mix used in bank wetland areas. This Landscape Planting Plan is found in Attachment 11, but one color copy of the booklet with all this information is also included with the application. 11. All exterior lighting is low and downcast with no light(s) directed toward the river or located down the slope and shall be in compliance with Section 26.575.150; Exterior lighting will comply with this land use requirement. 12. Site sections drawn by a registered architect, landscape architect, or engineer are submitted showing all existing and proposed site elements, the top of the slope, and pertinent elevations above sea level; and Attachment 12 shows four site sections prepared by Design Workshop, the project's landscape architect. The sections show the existing and proposed site vegetation below 5 m , and above the top of slope. The only proposed vegetation below the top of slope is a small area at the top of the bank planned for native wetlands plantings intended to add to bank stability and some bank restoration at the water's edge (Zones D, E, and F in the Landscape Plantings Plan). Attachment 14 gives site sections by the project architect which show the water, 100 year foodplain, the top of slope and top of bank. These seven sections are identified on the survey by Aspen Survey Engineers in Attachment 3. 13. There has been accurate identification of wetlands and riparian zones. Attachment 15 is a November 14, 2001 report from Andrew Antipas ofEcological and Environmental Consulting Inc. Figure 1 in Antipas' report identifies the riparian zone. He observed no wetlands in the project area. He states in his report that the proposed improvements will not impact riparian vegetation or wetlands along the Roaring Fork River. The routine criteria as described in the Army Corps ofEngineers 1987 Delineation Manual was utilized by Antipas in his investigation. This 1987 manual used the three parameters ofvegetation, soils and hydrology to identify wetlands. Antipas states that there is a sharp topographic break which defines the top ofbank in the project area and also defines where the landscape yard ends and where the riparian vegetation begins. Historically, Antipas notes, the building envelopes may have been in the riparian zone, but all that remains of this plant community are mature cottonwood trees. It appears that the cottonwoods were thinned with the construction ofthe existing house built in 1958 when the riparian vegetation was replaced with turf grass. This thinning and understory removal occurred throughout the flatter portions ofthe property. Antipas found the steep riverbank to be left undisturbed except for the construction and maintenance of the Harris irrigation ditch. The construction of Red Mountain Road may have disturbed the north edge of the property as characterized by the uneven distribution of road fill. Residential Design Standards This section ofthe application addresses the Residential Design Standards in Section 26.410.040 ofthe Aspen Land Use Regulations. The owners' architect, Cottle Graybeal Yaw, has met with the Community Development Department several times and discussed the plans for the proposed single family residence in order to assure compliance with the Residential Design Standards. Attachment 21 is a Residential Design Checklist Notification of Approval from Sarah Oates ofthe Community Development Department verifying that the proposed plans have been found to be in compliance with all Design Standards. Although not indicated on the Residential Design Checklist, the owners' architect understood from Sarah Oates that a strict interpretation of the language in the Building Element Design Standard, Section 26.410.040(D)(1)(a), may in fact indicate that an exemption may be required. In order to ensure full compliance with this standard, the applicant is requesting the waiver, in case that exemption is necessary. Ifthe exemption is determined to not be necessary, this section ofthe land use application is not applicable and should be ignored. The pertinent Section 26.410.040(D)(1)(a) reads as follows: 6 4 "1. Street oriented entrance and principal window. All single-family homes, townhouses and duplexes shall have a street-oriented entrance and a street facing principal window. In the case of townhouses and accessory units facing courtyards or gardens, entries and principal windows should face those features. Corner lots, entries and principal windows should face whichever street has a greater block length. Multiple unit residential buildings shall have at least one street-oriented entrance for every four units, and front units must have a street- facing principal window. This standard shall be satisfied if all of the following conditions are met: a. The entry door shall face the street and be no more than ten feet (10'0") back from the frontmost wall of the building. Entry doors shall not be taller than eight feet." Items (b) and (c) under this Section (D)(1) have been found to be in full compliance. The plans for the proposed residence include an entry door that faces the street, but instead of being 10'0" back from the frontmost wall ofthe building, the entry door is 16' 6" back from the frontmost wall of the building. See Attachment 8, the floor plan for the main level which shows the entry's orientation to the frontmost wall ofthe building. The applicant is requesting an exemption to this one item under the Building Elements standard pursuant to Section 26-222 of the Aspen Land Use Regulations. This Section addresses appeals to the Residential Design Standards. Any appeal for an exemption to the Design Standards must identify why the exception would: (1) yield greater compliance with the goals of the AACP, and (2) more effectively address the issue or problem a given standard or provision responds to, or be clearly necessary for reasons of fairness due to unusual site specific constraints." As stated in the introduction to Residential Design Standard D, Building Elements: "The intent of the Building Element standard is to ensure than each residential use has street-facing architectural details and elements which provide a human scale to the facade, enhance the walking experience and reinforce local building traditions. The applicant's proposed plans meet all other items under this Building Element Standard and is more than consistent with the intent of the Standard. The home's front facade provides a very comfortable, human scale. The location ofthe Rio Grande Trail and access to the Trail via the adjacent Shady Lane contributes to a very desirable walking environment in and around the subject property. The adjacent Roaring Fork River brings activity and also contributes to this 7 pedestrian environment. Please refer to Attachment 7 which gives an entrance elevation, a Shady Lane elevation and a rear Rio Grande Bridge elevation ofthe proposed home. All elevations show the home's low key, human scale, particularly given the unique corner lot location. The property is visible from Red Mountain Road, Shady Lane and the active Rio Grande Trail. The entrance elevation shown in Attachment 7 shows a large welcoming porch framed by two strong architectural elements on either side, a stone structure on the right and a gable element on the left side ofthe frontal view. These two features were intentionally broken offfrom the main ridge line and turned 90 degrees to break down the building mass and provide a strong terminus for the front porch. The front porch is 6 feet deep and has a low profile, welcoming visitors. On the courtyard or entrance elevation under this very usable front porch, the entry door is set back less than 10 feet. This setback from the porch roof above continues for the full 40 feet ofthe front porch. This large, welcoming porch creates the human scale desired and fulfills the intent of the Design Standard. A variance is needed since the front door is not 10 feet from the frontmost wall as the standard requires, even though the frontmost wall is 30 feet away from the front door. The proposed 16'6" setback from the frontmost wall is far enough away from the entry door that the setback should be a non-issue; the intent of the standard has been met in the first 40 feet ofthe porch. The change in the setback creates a more people friendly outdoor sitting area for visiting and viewing outdoor activity. The design breaks down the scale of the home, creates a more human scale and pedestrian environment and a more livable, usable outdoor area. Therefore, the proposed design, with the one minor waiver, more effectively addresses the standards. The Design Standards were written to enhance the livability of homes in the Aspen Original Townsite, the West End and other similar block environments in Aspen. The subject is not in a city block location and is much larger with 93,653 square feet. The home's design covers a larger area than would be available in a city block lot, so different design techniques can be used that would not be available for smaller city lots. These techniques accomplish similar results, but in a different manner. For the subject residence, the ends of the long, frontal view ofthe home are framed by two strong architectural elements, which provide closure, creating a more usable outdoor living area at an understandable human scale. This technique would not be appropriate for a smaller lot where the design should maximize the open area instead of closing it offto create a more usable setting. The subject's unique large parcel allows for a longer more articulate building facade than the typical 25 or 50 foot wide city block lot. Due to the nature of the subject's large lot size and the overall character ofthe immediate neighborhood, this Building Element Design Standard is not applicable, yet its intent has been met. Arguably, the intent has been better accomplished with techniques more appropriate to the large lot size. The subject is on a corner lot and faces Red Mountain Road, the street with greater block length. In addition to the large front porch, there are two, low profile, one story porches on the rear of the home which can be seen from the Roaring Fork River, the Rio Grande Trail and Shady Lane. This adds to the human scale and pedestrian character ofthe home as it is viewed from the nearby Trail and River. This goes above and beyond the requirement for only the front facade to add to the human scale and pedestrian experience and yields a greater compliance with the Design Standard and the AACP. 8 The home is not a large, grand mansion oversized for the lot, but rather a very comfortable, inviting residence oriented toward its surroundings, creating the human scale and feel the Design Standard was intended to create. Although an exemption from item (D)(1)(a) is requested, the proposed design complies with all the other Building Element Design Standards, (D)(2) regarding windows, (D)(3) regarding a one story element, (D)(1)(b) which calls for a one story front porch with a minimum depth of 6 feet and (D)(1)(c) which requires a street facing principal window group to face the street. These more than meet the intent and purposes of the Building Element Design Standard. The applicant therefore requests an exception to this one aspect ofthe Building Element Design Standard, Item D( 1)(a) regarding the entry door being 10'0" back from the frontmost wall ofthe building. Granting a variance from this setback would not negatively impact the street oriented entrance of the home as a street oriented front facade is very well accomplished with the proposed design. By meeting the intent and purpose of the Building Element Design Standard through the home's architectural design, the proposed design very effectively complies with the goals ofthe AACP. As mentioned in the introduction to this review, ifthe exemption for this standard is not necessary, this section ofthe application is not applicable and should be ignored. Summary This letter and the attachments demonstrate compliance with the Aspen Land Use Regulations for Stream Margin Review and Residential Design Standard. The applicant is requesting approval for one Residential Design Standard waiver. The following lists the attachments included with this letter. One bound set of24" x 36" drawings is submitted, the size required by the Land Use Regulations. The other 14 copies ofthe bound drawings are 30" x 42" as this is the size and scale the architects typically use in their work. The bound drawings include Attachments 2,3,5,9, 10, 11, 12 & 13. Other drawing sizes are noted. 1. Location/Site Vicinity Map (8.5" x 11"); 2. Existing Conditions Plan (11" x 17"; 30" x 42" and one copy at 24" x 36"); 3. Survey prepared by Aspen Survey Engineers (11 " x 17", 30" x 42" and one at 24" x 36"); 4. Letter dated March 16, 2001 from Richard Goulding approving the location ofthe top of slope pursuant to the drawing in Attachment 2; 5. Slope analysis prepared by Aspen Survey Engineers (11" x 17", 30" x 42" and one copy at 24" x 36"), 9 6. Picture of the model ofthe proposed home by Cottle Graybeal Yaw, Architects; (8.5"x 11"); 7. Entrance (NE), Shady Lane (NW) and Rio Grande Bridge (Rear) Elevations ofthe proposed home (11" x 17"); 8. Main level floor plan for the proposed home (11" x 17"); 9. Site Section showing Progressive Height Limit (11" x 17", 30"x 42" & one copy at 24" x 36"); 10. DWI Drawing: Site and Grading Plan; (11" x 17"; 30" x 42" and one copy at 24" x 36"); 11. DWI Drawing: Landscape Planting Plan; (11" x 17'; 30" x 42" and one copy at 24" x 36"); 12. DWI Drawing: Site Sections; (11" x 17"; 30" x 42" and one copy at 24" x 36"); 13. DWI Drawing: Site Mitigation; (11" x 17"; 30" x 42" and one copy at 24" x 36"), 14. Site Sections by Cottle Graybeal Yaw Architects (11" x 17"); 15. Andy Antipas, Ecological and Environmental Consultant's Report on the identification of the riparian and wetland areas on the subject property; 16. Agreement for Payment of Fees; 17. Authorization Letter from Roaring Fork LLC (Brad and Colleen Bell), Property Owners; 18. Proof of ownership (Title Commitment); 19. Pre-application conference summary sheet; 20. List of property owners located within 300 feet of the subject for public notice; 21. Residential Design Checklist Notification of Approval from Community Development Department indicating the proposed plans compliance with the Design Standards; and 22. Bound Color Copy of the Plant Species List (1 copy) 10 Please contact Davis Horn Incorporated if anything needs to be clarified or ifyou need any additional information. Sincerely, DAVIS HORN INCORPORATED GLENN HOLV AICP 11 .i 4 1 ATTACHMENT G . . 1, I 4 4% * , I. --- p:. El *--Â·U-in _26.~.*47- 40 1 l. Â¢ -2'. - 1 - 1 -- -- .Â· 1.. ..1 91 . + 4,~ -- L , 4/ W. i..., 464 f ' .+ a . 0 ./ I -: * t:Mt- * f 'Â· . . + 41%E.zÂ·zX,21$+,~#:r d.1,0~ \41'., ....- Â·'< 7' CrY'.1 9.;'12.f#16 *> â€¢Â·4;r . .. 1 4.,9,0:*ba 4-4=29 - . v . 1.::..,6, . # 1,1.440,4 . . ..1 .r A 4.# 3-3-LA - . I ./ 42.....:1 . .1*$.4.72.?1. . I . . 44*Uitt. +Lii ' ./2.0...04 .6. /':fjg// .- .* Ul ...... VE.Â·. .LE . Strearr/Margin Review ATTACHMENT .1 November 13, 2001 Location Map ,/52% )Halia:A : <0 : Vzia-tr 11, 1 0 999. 7 fjÂ¢0.-P/4 NO -ff -- < =-2 0 . - *ELAMiminment?. : r, 2-. jjet lt ' Â«> " tt -12 5tudies .it~3 i:, I -,t ti: 9, D.. 12Â· 19,1- 2 *< --AZhitZO'thd. 2-- Â¢iblji:-&63: t~~~ .r . 2. F: 0. k . i * '. r I. I I * 11.12 - . a . 11,4 â€¢ â€¢ 1,0 . 14 9 't*.1 6114;ker St . 6 r < Â· f Bfeeker k * *ifi-4 43*- 't ' 0 , ...11,1 ...:I). 1 6,3 - ;3.3,.Cle ; 4,3.96", 01%.4.- t= -- . H -maft Av ~ iviÂ·- 019 j> ttlit 205 -*90.. 401: ts.t.3- iii, .- 4 --- - 't .FÂ·:?5514 ' U - '. .--- 730'C- J 7.117' *, 7- 'C.06*flkA 112-IL~ift* fi Â»9 ~ =r=~- f>ni ~ ILI~-7~'< 1-~ 03-790~2 Paegcke Park, 4 i.,E . ' . ./ '._...46114IIAI' Koch Â¢*Â§;#444~il4~ i 74 * --,~- L <-.~if ~:.:..f- -35 /661 - L 42 t.. - 7...de 1/-4- - 5 1+ . r U.1 Landscape Architectune Â· Lard Planning Urban Design . Tourism Planning Atbuque,q,te Â· $Â· Denve Â· Jack,on Sdo Pa,do Â· hi Fe. rempe, LakÂ® rIhoe . 5/ 120 East Main Street Aspen, Colorado 81611 (970>-925-8354 Facsimile (970) 920-1387 WWW DESIGN W OR K SH OP CO M TRAIL 9FT WIDE ' POBTRACT NO 1 ' f ' . ..40 STONE 1 4Â»\ I J / u. i f. 6 / FOUNDATION MI~~ 5 \1 V 3 11 1 2/ i 1 1 N / //77,// , -' 7-1 -5 \Â£ 1 \ \ , , 6'/ / -,-,-9Â»Â«Â» Itkf=%- 1 7/3 4: <-% \ Â¥ , + i /\ //,2,3 * * 1 0iÂ« 9, ,-, 1 - / I V MO~Â»4 - 1 - / ,/2 2 - - =-1 . 4 9066.\4-4\.6 4 $..../.:.::2 \ . 'I ..<I X 1 UN \ , 7.00 // b . TRANS,411@R *-4-- - - iÂ·-,Ir- 93~ 1 EASEMTNT , 7841- - ---t-/ I M - ./ --\ \ \\ N PAVEMENT / / -~Â»0~-4f ff>. f 9 EDGE OF RIPARIAN - kX '/I l VEGETATION \ /4 I / 1 i . 6/ r q h. \ \ i . -/ 31 23 #./50-- . 4 \ \1\ / 1 /1,1 i .\ !.2 ,Â£ .x EXHOUSE ;~\ 1 . ' , n - I zI 81 1 7--,I ' .r /1: 2 h 1 - , " , 7. O 5 M ##- r<&;i . i L ir p dll \ _ 2 : -Â· AL* 4/1' 1 14 I.0+'~- *' F--, / 1-4 -vt i .\ , 9 - 11. --1 6 / i j '00/ ATTACHMENT 2 4> 7- EDGE OF RIPAR,AN 14 %-3 *.5.,1/525%~<.2/123%\ --Â»4 --I.jt~ 1~ ROARING FORK RIVER \ ho\12*k:>. 10 i 51 1 J -6 Â» I #424% - u--b -1 I6./ VEGETAT.. 0 \ \ \.\ 10Â»919-/,nottlf Â«7-7 <.1 1. i l. \ \\91 1\\ j <10.SerA - --73 1,~ '\N / --%'f*# Â·34# n \ 1,471 CONC CURB N 1 j -4 94%65\ i / 5---- r.2.,21,.,:, -BIKEPAT-fL-_~ \-- 40 1/ DITCHfA:fit.< A : h\\4\ft:2' ~ WÂ·':Trd ISSUE DATE N<y*r...5 2001 ..\ REV:IONI / / ROARING FORK RIVER # x-1421>Â« , 199<ffi.,4 ~ -_#-- ~'15__ DESCRIPTION 11- 4>43*.i 1 - h.\\1~ 1 -li- \ i \\ 4 -\-1~32+4-3 . 1\\\\\\41Â« 1\ 3 3 1 910Â«4>4 h -- / 1 li - / / 44Â»44./ 2 ./ DAA?,IN ~ REVEWED --~---W Stream Margin \\ Xt Review NOTES: 1) TOPOGRAPHY PREPARED BY ASPEN PROJECT NUNBER: 2748 SURVEY ENGINEERS. TOP OF SLOPE IS BASED UPON DRAWINGS SUBMIUED TO AND APPROVED BY RICHARD GOULDING, Existing CITY OF ASPEN PROJECT ENGINEER ON Conditions 3/16/01. 2) EDGE OR RIPARIAN VEGETATION SHEET NUI'*R DEUNEATED BY ANDREW ANTIPAS. SEE REPORT INCLUDED IN THE LANDUSE Ll -1 X \\\ APPLICATION. Â©COPY.,fâ€ž. DES'(21**Ill"00 N.' Â® N . H Â¥d./Â·INGO 011 >lkl03 DN 00Â¥hl0103'NEdSV aN MO' lili / LEGEND AND NOTES -~ 4 3. a b . 1. ?~9,24Â·90-: ~~ ~1<Â·~~4: r-- Â°~Ll* ANGLE RMlUS Â· 4 CH#RO .' CHORD BEARING ~ ~ . ..;. 28'75 51 2'3 33 los. Â· 194.77' S 30-16 26'E 'b...: ,~- 1 Â·/11+ 0 2-1 .- .11*51 14- :53.33 51:48 58.13 N 33Â°33Â· 47'1 3 \ ~ RED MOUNTAIN ~ ~ FOUND OR SET SURVEY MONUMENT IS DESCRIBED ~ - P.O.B.TRACT NO 1 0 30 60 POB RED MOUNTAIN ROAD R.0 W. A SURVEY CONTROL POINT - 9/ 50 F \1 1 2 FOOT CONTOURS HUNTER CREEK 4%911 4 3 a I A 2015. MONUMENTS 112 AND 111 N 0943 01 W IGR!D BEARING) WEST 5652.6 ~ EAST 376 A BEARING ARE GEODETIC 8ASED ON CITY/COUNTY GPS. .1 \Ilt k5947 1... O UTILITY 80X WEST /4 CORNERAECTION 7, TOWNSHIP 10 SOUTH, RANGE \\ /T. 1954 8 L.M. BRASS CAP ~ ~~~23~6 W \ / 63 4 - 3,663 5 F 84 WEST OF THE I+H PM. TRACT NO 1 <f'*4I ~lft <\1~Â» 1 - 1 , ~/ Fortr' 01 *1 94 1 0 r /1// 2/ f L l MANHOLE - 1 \ 4"2< E --- --h L \1~~ ----- - EASEMENT BK 370, )43 AND # 378. PÂ¢ d., ./ irruu! 2-\> i 0 JillrY POLE ~ 4-49 ~~\7\ 7830 BRASS CAP 1 + 38/ ' 4%7 -t> l' 0 Z .\'\ T'E EOR NARRIS DITCH IS DOES NoT Fir i \90<1.L:t\ , J // i 'hy/20 kc.:#2 ~fi - 1.,> 4 \\ //// e /\le'l I -/ ''1 TITLE :NFORMAT'ON PROV DED BT 1<301 4, DXN:62(05: TRANSFORMER EASEMENT PITKIN COUNTY HTLE; INC -/ 41 378, PG. 965 , DR>41 fi Â» .\4\ DATED. OCTOBER 6, 2000 CASE NO PCTi 5608L + i fi:* NK : \ 036 39 / .- CITY OF ASPEN DEPITMENT OF ENGINEERING MAP ~ - .--- -~ .~ -- CALLS N.1 BOOK 49 At PAGE 21 1 11 t. 9]1* 7.Fo ; -99 --z/ / . 9 1- - '/ 66'~ ~ \/ / a , ~l PAYEMENT / ~ TREE 6Â· OR GREATER LOT IS COVERED W TH TREES NOT & i TREES LOCATED PARKi NG L 0*___ _ -/~ thsâ‚¬./// / ~'* ~~El ~ LOCATIONS NEED TO AE F IELD VERFIED BEFORE CONSTRUCTION - --- -0 - -- TOP oF SL OPE WATERU. i NG u L O 0. 'UTiL/BES -- Â£#f ?7 . 04 g T ATTACHMENT- 3 ; 01 SET 100 YEAR CLOOD POIN AND FLOODWAY DIGITIZED SA >18.0 J - .//9 - . \-.O zzl- _ 1~2 / . 4\ C , Ot t \ 5.-4 'ak Mt p 0.8 TRACT NO. 4 J 03 1 U.,2 \ /0: t.1 HOUSE .4 , \7 FLOOR 7850 I ~ \ 00 ./R *1000) PLAIN r Et- CER71FICATÂ·ON OYERHANG NIELD SURVEYED DURING -,PAC-1* , Z~11 AND IS ACCURATE THE UNDERSIGNED STATES THAT jHE PROPERTY DESCR BED HEREON WIS BASED ON THE F i El D E Â¥ 1 DENCE AS SHOWN J WD THAT THERE ARE NO P m \ /0.1 F-.. DISCREPANCIES oF RECORD, BOUNDARY LIAE CONFICTS, ENCROACHMENTS, /1 \ 9 ./T ? 1- =62612*1 / 0 EISEr ENTS OR RIGHTS OF WAY IN FIELD EVIDENCE OR KNOWN '0 ME, EXCEPT AS HEREON SHOWN UNDERGROUND UTILITIES I,TH NO ABOVEGROUND L L /3 APPUR'ENANCES, AND DOCUMENTS OF RECORD NOT SUPPLiED TO THE . 1 SURVE'.OR 'RE 1 Â«IP,qill./IN 'SURVEY I S VO ID UNLESS WET STAMPED ,~~- POB TRic:T I,O ~ ANQ/3 -f~ '1|~~ It 916 DATF~~0*10* . 1 \ WITH THE SEAL & tt(E t(1999.5 BELOW N '07,1 1 40.01~1. Pyi,djs"'.- 3 - 3,1 . 4 -mila :\0 -FLOODWAY - El Â·fle = -\ taj/'blho -ij \ 1% 13 0 7 1 -r- - 4 C \ r.- TOP 0( / * 1 - co, - L.Gr _TOP (Fl - _ 3 , ' , J '24 1 1% Z. 0 SLOPE 1 2 4>0 ~SLOPE#~*--1 i; 11 07<z.7 /42-,04Â£33=21 / -\ Â£ 1 4%30 'j~~ i ~~~~422 t. ~<~~~~ 3~~Â¢; ~L._ 1\ 1 STREAN MARG IN REV IEW SURVEY .* W A: p. , BUTTERMILK . 049 42, 722166. 4.46.4,trtÂ»Z----* i. ' .. OF 1 47 J. \ ..1-\ THE FOLL.OWING TR.ETS OF LAND LOCATED liN SECTION 7Â· TOWNSHIP 10 SOUTH, --\ - 429.4 1 L.<L - ---1-DO Â©A A,.:\.1 RANGE 84 WEI OP THE 66 PR,NCIPI. MERIDIAN DESCRIAED AS FOLLOWSÂ· , :RACT NO ] 1- W -\ i N ..Go\'.4% \ 9 DEG:kINING AT CORMIER NO 1 A PINE POST WHENCE THE WEST 1/4 CORNER TO SECTION 7, TOWNSHIP 10 SOUTH, RINGE 64 WEST OF THE 6Â·h P M , BEARS WEST 552.6 FEETÂ· U S L.M. UTE NO 4 BEARS S 28Â°04 E 3654 d REE w 4 THENCE SOUTH 200 FEET. THENCE EAST 376 FEET: THENCE N 7iÂ°34 W 395 3 FEET THENCE NORTH 75 FEET; 30 THE P,.ACE OF BEGINNING VARIE ON OF 14'40 E. \ ~ DIVED B KE DITH 1 RACT NO 2 BEGINNING THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF A 'RACT DESCRIBED IN DEED RECORDED IN BCOK 49 Af PAGE 12, PITK N COUNTY CLERK AND RECORDER S OFFICE C BEING ALSO THE SOUTHE/T CORNER 09 TRACT 1 ABOVE 1 THENCE SOUTH .25 FEET MORE OR LESS TO THE NORTH BANK THE ROARING FORK RIVER THENCE WESTERLY ALONG THE NORm BANK OF THE ROAR I NG FORK R I YER 305 FEET MORE OR LESS 41Â« \\0\\ \\\4 1 14 FENCE NORTH 150 FEET MORE OR LESS TO THE SOUTH LiNE OF SAID TRACT DESCR BED , BOOK 49 AT PAGE 12, PITKIN COUNTY CLERK AMID RECORDER S OFFICE THENCE SOUTH 71 34 E 341.3 FEET TO THE PLACE OF BEGINNING 6 896\ 4 4 TRACT NO 3 0 . BEGÂ·NNING AT 4 POINT WHENCE THE WEI :/4 CORNER OF SECTION 7, TOWNSHIP 10 SOUTH: RANGE 84 WEST OF THE lih PM, REIFS NORTH 200.00 FEET i ,â€¢.NO WEST 938 6 FEET (THE TRUE POINT OF TRIANGULAR PARCEL MORE FULLY DESCRIBEb AS FOLLOWS) Â· 100 'PR 1-2.00 PL' THEN63 SOUTHEASTERLY ALONG THE SOUTH RIGHT OF WAY L NE OF THE COUNTY AND FLOODWAY :-1.\Off ROAD A DISTANCE OF 300 FEET TO THE ENTERSECTION oF SAID ROAD WITH THE NORTH BANK OF THE WIR I NG F OR K R 1 VE R . THENCE NORTHERLY AND WESTERLY ALONG THE NOR 1 H B ANK OF THE ROA R I NG F ORK IÂ¢ER A DISTANCE 210 0 FEET TO THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF THAT CERTAIN TRACT DESCR BED IN BOOK 49 AT PAGE 57, OFFICE OF THE PITK N COUNTY CLERK Â»iD RECORDER THENCE NORTH 125 0 FEET :0 THE POINT OF BEGIN!4!NG, BEING THE SAME PROPERTY DESCR VED UPON DEED RECORDED IN BOOK 177 / PAGE 128, PITKIN COUNTY CLERK AND RECORDERS OliCE TRACT NO 4 . ~ BEGINNING Al A POINT WHENCE THE WEST 1/4 CORNER OF SECTION 7 TOWNSHi P 10 SOUTH; RANGE 84 WEST OF THE 616 P 4 BEARS NORTH 175.06 FEEf, AND WEST 938.6 FEET, THENCE S 44Â°29 24 9 159.10 FEET THENCE S 34Â°05 00Â·E 119.84 FEET. THENCE S 52Â°30-00-W 52 FEET MORE OR LESS 'O THE IPARENT MEAN HIGH WATER LINE OF THE ROARJNG FORK RIVER SHADOW MOUNT"N THENCE NORTH 32Â°06 24- WEST 258.90 FEE:. THENCE 24 9 FEEl MORE OA LESS IO THE POINT OF BEGINNING EXCEMING FROM THE 40Â¥E DESCRiBED PROPERTY THE FOLLOWING DESCRIBED PROPEITY 8EGINNING AT A POINT WHENCE -HE WEST 1/4 CORNER OF SEGION 7, TOWNSHIP 10 SOUTH, RANGE 84 WEST OF THE 6,h P M BEARS WEST 802 70 FEET, THENCt E+ST 63.49 FEET THENCE 58 48 FEET ZONG K CURVE To T/F LEFT WHOSE RAD'Us 1 153 33 FEEL CHORD A S P E N MC G N D 1 N 8EARS S 33*33 47Â·E 58.13 FEET: THENCE S 44-29 24-6 57.48 FEET THENCE SOUTH 85.62 FEET TO -HE POINT OF: 8EGINNING OF TRACT 3 *ENDED. THENCE N 44Â°29Â·24-W 118.55 FEET, THENCE 105.86 FEET ALONG A cURv E To ThE RIGHT WHOSE RADE 8 213.33 FEET, CHORD BE/RS N 3/Â°16 26 W !04.77 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING li CONTAIN,NG 93,6%3 SO Fl /- INDEPENDENCE PASS \ . .. .r; ,. ~ PREPARED BY ty. '.3 ASMEN SURVEY ENG.INEERS, t,Ng'. 2-'~ t.-ty 210 SOUTH MENA STREET . '- -=i,Â· fi.:1 ASPEN, COLORADO 81611 t. Â· fâ‚¬ 1~Â·Q.~ ~Â·Â·!-'-~~.Â· ~~ MP~*ili,41..,.,.~62&44Â£- m.. Fac. 11. DATE.. THEÂ·IERTIFICATEON.,40.Â» li~~17& PHONE/FAX 970; 925-38%' . t j~3 DATE JOB â€¢ - : ' . im,g,.... 4 1610 IF ......#. Ilâ„¢ T. stâ€¢L . T. SHEET 1 OF 2 3/01 260926 I .t-* , 2~:e3: - _ .- +- Hlyd 39 68 ONeD -- 1Â¥"4 91-69 . ATTACHMENT ~ - If.Sly<Al/2//1.979 EÂ¢3?.14.- :-46 1 THE CITY OF ASPEN 01120 March 19,2001 To whom it may concern, The line defining the top o f slope at 17 Shady Lane on the drawings submitted to me bn March 16, 2001 drawn by Aspen Survey Engineer Inc is an accurate representation o f the top o f slope as defined by the City of Aspen Engineering Departnient. We recognize that the property has two different levels and that one is represented by Section F and G with the other being represented by B, C, D and E. The Engineering Department has retained a copyof these drawings. 4-- Richard Goulding, Project Engineer 130 SOUTH GALENA STREET Â· ASPEN, COLORADO 81611-1975 PHONE 970.920.5000 Â· FAx 970,920,5197 Printed on Recycled Paper I. I A ~4 I DELTA ANGLEE RAD 4 WORD CHORD BEARING ~ 28â€¢25Â·51 213.33 105.86~ 104.77 S 30Â°16Â·26'E 21*51 14 153 i3 58.48 58.13 N 33Â°33 47 W LEGEND AND NOTES I FOUND OR SET SURVEY MONUMENT AS DESCRIBED 1 -30 ,~50-1 P 08 TRACT NO 1 r- 9 0.8 RED MOUNTAIN ROAD R O.W. 8 SURVEY CONTROL POINT 0 30 60 1 / 447 -N,376 5. 6 D UTILITY BOX , , , #k< Â«~419 r : BEARING ARE GEODETIC BASED ON CITY/COUNTY G.P.S. MONUMENTS 112 AND 111 N OSÂ°43Â·01-W IGRID BEARING) WEST 562.6 1 , 1 EAST 376 4 . 9' , 0 --,7. U 63 49 \ ; gl/*82031 1 - 3,663 S I ./ \ \\ 1 20:51 ~WES~0~'6~P.~ 7, ' ~\I \~ TRACT NO .1 / 'I.-IL 0 \ Illm TOWNSHI P 10 SOUTH v RANGE 1~ ' MANHOL E 1954 B.L M BRASS CAP / *f Lf 20 9Â¢WER AND ~G~ ~ / zz-~4~ *P \2 -,2, ./1 - 12-+ A-1+-1.,9 1 \[1\ 4 0 UTILITY POLE EASEMENT BKI Â£1.-4 AND *tK 378,~ BRASS CAP TIE FOR HARRIS DITCH IS DOES NO[ FiT :1 2 3 1/6,7Mfi~~~~~' *242 1 1%9. _\ rel 1.tt,41'to \ ~ TITLE INFORMATION PROÂ¥!DED BYÂ· 7"ji ~ A <1~~~~~~61 ~\\', / 1 DITED: OCTOBER 6, MOO %909> W. 7%4#7\ CASE NO PCT 15608l PITKIN COUNTY TITLE, iNC. SPORMER EASEMENT PG 965 , A 4 Â·5'0/' , DRAE - 4,1 IY f 4 0 --- - --- 7 , SET ' INZED 'r.1 1 31 1 - - 9.37 Z 4 / * 1'~ T?50 1 CALLS IN [ 1 BOOK 49 IT PAGE 21 .ir / / PAVEMENT 1 1> / 9~,2 \ PARKING \// 0 e WATERL{NE . % U?b) 1 / / 3 4 ~ t ~- -- -8- 0- OVERHEAD UTILIT,ES----0~:0 6,- / f (411=1 1 7850 4 ATTACHMENT 5 9 0 I 0 ~OUSE 8\I \ 4Â·Â· ~ PO-B-TRACT No. 4 ~ -40! ' 1 42. 1 11* \ ./ 1 1 y L OVERIWe 9184 CERT!FICATION Ul Iii- PATIO __J'' f /.0\ \Ii /.I \ \ THE UNDERSIGNED STATES THAT THE PROPERTY DESCRIED HEREIN WAS ALUM F,ELD SURVEYED DURING $-T 2000 AND 1 S ACCUR,â€¢TE 1 P.01 TRACT NO. 2 ANq/3 94 EASEMENTS OR RIGHTS OF NAY IN FIELD EV DENCE OR KNO~IN TO ME \/ BASED ON THE F TELD EVIDENCE AS SHOWN, AND fHAT THERE ARE NO DISCREPANCIES OF RECORD, BOUNDARY L INE CONFLICTS, ENCROâ€¢CHMENTS , N N ,i ". EXCEPT As HEREON SHOWN UNDERGROUND UTILITIES WITH NO ABOVE~ROUND \6 / 1 6\. APPURTENANCES, AN[k De,~pENTS DE RECORD NOT SUPPileo To THE L\ -- .6.4 2 ~. d ~ ON~o W I TH THE SEAL Â· Cr :PE SUR,0Â¥OR BELOW SURVEYOR ARE EXCEPTi; 741 s SURVEY 1 S VOID UNLESS WET 51 IMFED \* 2 :2+T JOÂ«24' 2*-1 3 = 4 L -6. u. \ \ O < %\.. ? DATE~.alatup EfÂ·1 . r~,4., Tr- 4-- 0=- N.,&~. ~---YJAZ#R&'072 : (/\ . LU- 4&487 , \- 3 t.r----:' +0% *144- -1- 1- _ t j , L \+ 1\1 IMPROVEMENT SURVEY 44/44 P . 1 . , -,- 0. r I =4 - -043.- F .-1 -1-73Â§.4.-d \ \ \\ 044.- 4%,1 6-U- : . -r--~ _ 1-4,-12- T 1 Â· THE FOLLOWING TRACTS OF LAND LOCATED IN SECUION 7 TOWNSHIP 10 SOUTH RANGE 84 WEST OF THE 6/ PRINCIPAL MERIDIAN DESCRI~ED .AS FOLLOWS 4/ pre . A*,=117 - -U 1- 1=,-M-,2-AtÂ·1 7 TRACT NO . 1 BEGINNING AT CORNER NO 1 , PINE Po)51 WHENCE THE WEST 1/4 CORMIER TO SECT ON 7, \ 7* 1 FE 11 43-41- 'R . .- i ~ TOWNSHIP 10 SOUTH, RANGE ~4 WEST OF THE 6,5 P.M , BEARS WEST 562 6 FEET. USLM UTE No 4 BEARS S 28~04 E 3654 4 FEET THENCE EAST 376 FEET tnft _ I JrÂ·-1~ ,.... i . I . 44Â· 1 THENCE SOUTH 200 FEET THENCE N 71-34-1 395 3 FEET THENCE NORTH 75 FEET, TO THE PLACE OF BEGINNING VAR!*T ON OF 14-40 E. 1 ..402~11.111'142.- .... ' , PAVED 8Â¢KE PATH fRACT NO. 2 SLOPES GREATER THAN 30% 29)875 s. At '04 BEGINNING â„¢E SOUTHEAST CORNER OF A TRICT DESCRIBED IN DEED RECORDED IN BOOK 49 AT PAGE 12, FITKIN COUNTY CLERK AND RECORDER S OFFICE ( BEING ALSO THE SOUTHEAST CORNER Of TRACT 1 ABOVE)Â· THENCE SOUTH 125 FEET MORE OR LESS TO THE NORTH BANK THE ROAR ING FORK R IVER \ 'ffÂ· 3 -'ikÂ·. Â· 1 11 Â·Â·Â·L Â·~~ 1. C Z.~_ -1' / ~ . \Je\ THEM#CE WESTERLY koNG THE NORTH BANK oF THE Ro~Ri NG FORK R:VER 305 FEE7 MORE OR LESS w : % - 7..1 1 1. \,t\ BOOK 49 AT PAGE 12, Pl TKI COUNTY CLERK AND RECORDER S OFFICE: THENCE NORTH ISO FEET MORE OR LESS TO THE SOUTH LINE OF SAID TRACT DESCRIBED THENCE SOUTH 71 34 E 341 3 FEET TO THE PLACE OF BEGINNING \ ..iÂ·-61:ll -it ./: TRACT NO 3 111. 2 BEGINNING IT A PO,2 WHENCE THE REST 1/4 CORNER OF SECTION 7, TOWNSM,/ 10 SLOPES BETWEEN 20-30% 3,570 69. /Ck -tk , SOUTH RANGE 84 WEST OF THE 6,h P M BEARS NORTH 200.80 FEET AND WEST 938 6 FEET Â· t THE TRUE POINT OF TR IANGULAR PARCEL MORE FULLY DESCRI BE6 AS FOLLOWS) THENdE SOUTHEASTERLY,I,LONG THE SOUTH RIGHT OF WAY LINE OF THE COUNTY ROAD A DISTANCE OF 300 FEET TO THE INTERSECTION OF SAID ROAD WITH THE NORTH BANK OF THE ROARiNG FORK RIVER. THENCE NORTHERLY AND WESTERLY ILONG THE NORTH BANK OF THE ROIRING FORK RiVER A DISTANCE 210 0 FEET TO THE SOLIThEAST CORNER OF THAT CERTA IN MACT DESCR IBED IN 'BOOK 49 IT PAGE 57, OFFICE OF THE PI TK IN COUNTY CLERK AND RECORDER- THENCE NORTH 125.0 FEET TO THE PINT OF BEGINNING BEING THE SAME PROPERTY DESCR1@ED UPON DEED RECORDED IN BOOK 177 AT PIGE <28, PiTKIN COUNTY CLERK AND RECORDERS OFFICE. TRACT NO 4 BEGINNING AT I POINT WHENCE THE WEST 1/4 CORNER OF SECTION 7 TOWNSHIP 10 SOUTH, RANGE 84 WEST OF THE 6,h P.M j BEARS NORTH 175.06 FEEf, AND WEST 938 6 FEE[, THENCE S 44Â°29 24-E 159 10 FEET: THENCE 5 34Â°05 00-E 119.84 FEET: THENCE 5 52'30 00-W 52 FEET MORE OR LESS TO THE APPARENT MEAN HIGH WATER LINE OF THE ROAR ING FORK RIVER: THENCE NORTH 32Â°06 24- WEST 258 90 FEET: THENCE 24 9 FEET MORE OR LESS TO THE PO'NT OF BEGINNING EXCEPTING FROM THE ABOVE DESCRIBED PROPERTY THE FOLLOWING DESCRIBED PROPERTY BEGINNING IT A POINT WHENCE THE WEST /4 CORNER Of SECTION 74 TOWNSHIP 10 SOUTH, RANGE 84 WEST OF THE 6, h PM, BEARS WEST 302 70 FEE, , THENCE EAST 63.49 FEET THENCE 58,48 FEET ALONG I CURVE TO THE LEFT WHOSE RAD IUS I S 153.33 FEET : CHORD BMRS S 33Â·33Â·47-E 58 13 FEETÂ· THENCE S 44'29 24-Â£ 57.48 FEET: THENCE SOUTH 85.62 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING OF TRACT 3 AMENDED: THENCE N 44'29 24-* 118.55 FEETÂ· THENCE 105.86 FEET ALONG A CURVE TO THE R IGHT WHOSE Wlus iS 213.33 FEET, CHORD BEARS N 30'16 26-1 104 77 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINN]NG CONTAINING 93,653 SO. FT. â€¢/ PREPARED BY ASÂ°EN SURVEY ENGINEERS, INC. 210 SOUTH GALENA STREET ASPEN, COLOR,00 61611 , %;P~5&*IÂ°*i:>-/CB M PHONE/FAX (9709 925-3816 DATE J08 -Ft:mulru,PV:7 2.. #,7.49 :T. '*. 8.1.... 10/00 26092A -- -* IlÂ¥6 3111 G Dio' 031/1/0-v: 1 At Oid INÂ¥ 0 ---- X I. .A''m'- - - 4| LI ' -----=/2 ---------===-~----===~-<~~~ - u~EAd~â€¢th ~&6.- .f ,~,; .1 . , ~il *Ri '41, f.' M 'E~.~. -~ ' 2//.r451#0%~ !1 !'~1~1111]HU~tiÂ·j')i f li.' 1.i !11 -TWU/41251-:~1412.5///, ~'.~45'/0- I.,1.Ii.li~: i- -.11*111 190~ell'~11 J~~:=03~~/.~ -/~i~~1 1 Vt ,Â·.iu =-jb-*31 -L-&2262'.,I 11 11-'Cll 11% II E.M-- -.Ii- -4- -i~, -'lrlorru =u=Mt---* 611~ I r .t-VE[ --ir -1,- IriT 7 7, 1,- M I .22--/1 .2-1Â· . -, a - '111 1,9 11.1.- , :7 -==-6 /1.A -- - 1 1.1.1. . 11.*161 11 . ' lili 1 , m =1.1 11 601/ 6. + -'-7.-96:*1- 1 --1 /7 40*Li -.1-4.A 1 1. L- L.li.. .....9/: ..1 lill/- - 1..1. - 'Ed li ill|~|21 lit #<ai~L~3-6,â€¢r ..,6, 11 m.- lili.... E .1 1 'fi'.1 F"l rt-*,-r#-, Â¥-Imuti \4#114 44~i 1.Fl:,wilttll'Â·illulp 1 4~i,|~-- -4,119#*auti#rtillill)1144:24~y\tiAi:41 :111~ 1.411*:- \9,1111't I , -- f 1- trvt. iv~Â·114 - - -1-Â· -'' - ~ 1' Â· 'U>- .Â·'1-Â· Â·, A,|W ,41 4:I[I 1:1 .11.1::It.,I '' , - ., --.\ - ..,/r =Ch .I~ 1. @ir =-3- J.Mul.00*:~k=*Al 1.VI-- 14-119:Ae'lillim) Mill"~ 1 ialli:illillilililillillillililill:"Ill"'ll"Ill'lill.liANI 'll 11'llillillillill:ilip~"bilo-- - .. d-,a - li - 6;- im -4--Ijill=q#~|= :'*.T--~4*Q~ 4 9 ...Am , 17= '-c,OMi#Qi;.g-ifiiillimISE,11".9,:2,1,1 :'St-i ~4~,t:,/- '- ~~;~~U~ C~ZL-~1-JN'~~417 _~~ -- 5....4.=L B $ Â·, -&-0 53,â€¢ - G. %2191 -9- .=r, ......ill'll'll................"'-'1 20-Ill Â·i, -2-74--,--,rielil.â€ž--lN** .Q. -, 44/<'Ii'I::::i. Fil ,-- -I--Ill.-I.- i.*11-ililil ~,1..1!Fe~N- El"du ./*1.1.1-1.1 =/./.' *i//1/,/lf-! 1/.1../.ilit"/1//1//R /"/i'imilli////1/Fii c --- - 1.9-1 -i:- -- - .2:ja - - Â£ . - 15102 i . - ~-l zijl~},itllit, al.t'I 1-j .Li,61....11/11 - ivs'.7.--,#p~--fl i)ilitlil. f tr . - ./ I.- j 9 ... 4 - ....1 ....1 -, 14=51:'.1 f .-1allj , 1 1Â· 8, Â·.1. litâ€¢â€¢ i L \,men- d .PE b ., , 1, 1 .1" 1;, I . 1 .1 '*i P.--7.4 - -- h - 0 11 1, i ;#B/.Imt '.1- ./0 0/7. 62.1< . 11.'Irmi lin [0*him 1%#$ i-1. --- - - yid//8/7/ir-13."Allin/// h D -- --J~'~449542>f~32.4 -~ - 1 . 16 ~.*AY*1*,LIB *4111/111*. *i 1 ---- -*.--i *1~ 1~~1 ~ &1Â£1 0. 1 1 - I . . 11 -t= 1- ,/All Jill:.i 1/4 Mel,1 lial- ~ --24 ~1498 2 . - .1............ ~ ~ ui~ -t&674-i,C~1.,~fa5~,~&<,~A2:~~~,~29dj - ;:~'ll.='-I'-92. .2,"'1~ ---'.fi'' i ->CÂ»= iU,El~b:2*1*AE[~1~Ili /, .1 3,31il - -10 â€ž- -- ..1 -1111.1.111 i~'ll.=1-~~1.-1. i J*-*-11....gEN' 1~,17 ...Ii//=-1 -z.I jiâ‚¬i01Â¢11**Imillii ~~Ar. Jililill]09 ji;3;p&4111111 193,Iil~:tl?11[Illfltliti,Il;Itiolli\;iff .3;11#11}1)_*11Â¤1*Â¢F. Â¢itilltlil 11111~1~11~1~1~Ijilliij*t = -, I I .6.- f ~Â»=12 -ah, 4=~ . ...... .,7.51%9=, .681.... "!il.,f 1*111'2 jg';illi.. =- =U m~ - .1,1!.9.19= 1. 1....=m.lia..1.*--1.1!~ t 9 1.Zrd"- I - L .-. . 1 . - A . .A : A . A. . 1 Â¢ f... 1 GUEST BATHROOM ~- ~~ .-~ - - -~- - = = ~ ~ . - L BUNK ' q ROOM ' ~ f 'Â·Â·i Â· . 1 e. P' 1 - - f- 'j /-1 1 .:i L ro GUEST 1 i : GUEST PORCH T ~ GARBAGE STORAGE , l l BEDROOM 1 GUEST - 3 , .A .-- j " 1 BATHROOM '' 2, 1 1.4 -Irt r I 1 -4%14. If j 4 3 I :$ HALL STUDY a.,._..,... J L 1 "% 1 0 11 L LL 1 POWDER ROOM ~ 1 -0 1 L..:i Tr : ~Â·-" LIVING ROOM 'r-t /' /~ COAT } ~ ~~ h ROOM i} :,Â· 22' It ! LL 1 1 SUN 1 - r.4 i _L__ ROOM ~ |~ Â· .11 1 jaLE Ilt ENTRY ~ FRONT 1 -â€ž j " PORCH j bÂ·Â· uyÂ·- fi : f'â‚¬ r n 11 L IC Â·11 STAIR UP..............0....--4 [- 1 N JI A Â· U : --1-/A k .4 13 f I DINING ROOM ~ 1 r. L.j 1 " M U Â·Â· - t-9 . R '1 - PORCH Â·~ laTCHEN , rn ..., 1 =1 1 . -I Iii 1 :11 1 FAMILY ... . 1, 1 48 1: A 1 1 ROOM. Â»11 18 : 1 1 D j 2% 7. 1. fl i 1.. ldll 1 -Â· ..il ' - I ..1 i -1- 49-7 49-7~~--.- i 4 ..- ~...... ..... k. ..../L:51h =~-- Â· I i DESK PANTRY :%.al . 1 . I.-*.- I.- L -__ 4 1 1 1 , MUD 0 ''. ROOM 0 2. t: , BREAKFAST k: 1 1 I| C ' ROOM POWDER! i .1 . . : lili 11 1 1 -/1 , P.I. , GARAGE-- , ; i 91331IHOMV LAVA 1Â¥3Â£[AVMD GI1LLOD NV1d 13A31 NIVI/\1 30N3GIS3kI 1138 ATTACHMENT % . COTTLE GRAYBEAL YAW 15' TOS SETBACK- STREAM MARGIN arcbitects PROGRESSIVE REVIEW 228 Midland Avenue HEIGHT LIMIT P.0 Box 529 BASALT, CO 81621 r tel 970 927.4925 TOP OF SLOPE 510 East Hyman 2 fax 970.927.8578 . ASPEN. CO 81611 tel 970.925.2868 fax 970.925.2877 | P.O. 80* 3507 PROPOSED 107 North Fir Street DEVELOPMENT TELLURIDE. CO 81435 tel 970.728.3037 fax 970 728 3236 P.O. Box 6337 37347 US Highway #6 i Suite 200 5/ ~ tel 970.748.1516 ~ AVON, CO 81620 -56 fax 970.748 1518 ' aspen@cgy/ rchitects com -- - 48 BELL t le - 44 RESIDENCE - -- -- -- _ 38' i 3.11' ! \--4.-T 'Â·Â·.LÂ·...~ ...Â· 32' STREAM MARGIN REVIEW BUILDING SECTION SCALE 1/8 = 1Â·-07 ATTACHMENT 9 .- 6% ' , i .44>.:Wmi' i \ / /7/ 3 1 /5 0 1 j \ 2\12 / 44%\,\ \1 \\\ i '-- 1/// j 4/1/1 1 . 3 17 SHADY LAN \ 4 ,- - 16 11 \\\ \\ 1 111-.-11 1 ASPEN, 1 /55(1' / 2~\~\ , -Look\ -' / COLORADO \\4 ,i1/ . Ati~ .1/7 2 9 ~~ 422%2333*Y Dr, 2 ~~ f It \\ 4.\6 Â£ 6%? FILE: STREAMMARGIN DWG 9Â». 3--/ %4 DATE 11/14/01 DRAWN BY: JD CHECKED BY: JD ISSUE. PROGRESS 04 it? tif 'Â· 0. HOUSE ' X 74. 4 '' \A\\E j=t ..... 1% REVISIONS: ....IUV Â· 7~iiÂ· . 111 D %. . 't> /15' TOS SETBACKÂ·- /4 4 3 -5% X le'.,,. / STREAM MARGIN.* ,/1*/ 'tkf'\ . 1 1 73- \1. /-1--99?414> 11 1 4 4 1 1 , 1 51 \ ROARING Gl ..2,5-J::32 94:262---- \0\\ I polk N . %- #Â«24_ EFT*:1:46 1 */431> 1 -\lif~Tâ‚¬Z Â»JAZE*A r~~~ \\\ STREAM MARGIN REVIEW \ ..An \\0 STREAM MARGIN REVIEW SITE MAP 414. 1\ \Al \\ 0\ \ \\\ \ A" Il'. SCALE 1/32~ =r' 4/*5#46'. SMR 2 0 1 @ 1 1 @ 1 Â® 1 0 1 0 1 Â® 1 1 1 0 0 DESIGNWORKSHOP Lands,ape Architecture Â· Land Planning Urban Design â€¢ Tourism Planning ./.u.....Â»el. De/rer...... 2, R.......â€¢ Tempe â€¢.4 7040.. e' 3 1 1 IT-L-TWIDE 120 East Main Street Aspen, Colorado 81511 (970*925-8354 ~ ,~/, Facsimile (970) 920-1387 WW IDE./......8/0 P.COM \ 1 \. 4 .-I 1 \ , ' 1 Â· OLD SÂ·roNE ~ 1 - 1 ,# < FOUNDATION ' \ , 1 / a , ti<.'f . * 2' STONE WALL im W 1 . 1 0/ h /f. -..EWAY 2 3 LA @ L f 9 ~_-F . i.:6 . 1 . 10 \ \ . 41> . /1 l ' 0 \ -6-/-- -* 42 -,bf/ke35217-4\\>'.:- - . 6,5 1 \,t 1.14 \ isj ~u-___-1--_-=-23*FSE>- ./4933-. , I 'dz'Al ..42 \. 40 R i ....ING STONES A -2 - --1Â»-Uit'-fEO- 5 59. 1 /3 - / 6/ -4 ;A" \ ' I -- r , . Y/' i \ 1 \ -1 \\ -0 i /--4--77Â«---I**2*,9300-- ht-~.3.' 7 4 /\ /4 63--1 \ -1 L, F / - //-4 '95 \ \ --TR Â·r Â»- ARCelnECTURAL BUILDING ENVELOPE ,Â·PrP J ~ .. b--2> 12< - I :\ Â».4,9 ~:f~~%1-~ 1. -1.-k *FFE 7*05 :, i . n. i, 1.25/ r---f .1 / -4,111 -1 \ h \ t' ~A~/SCAPE BILDING ENVELOPE m.p) 2. I - h * 4, 1-''F#' ~~4 u -- 4. 1 / 8 \ % 1--h a ' 1 , I 'C \1 i k -%/ /IX. KN \1 62 ~~ ': ' v? 4>.7 52.t \ Oz 1, \ 7. , - / 1.' 0\ 1 0 U t.>*5~ .-1. K .4 - 0- \ \.- / f ''Â¥~ ~ / Â»I \' 31 1 4 1 \ - Ir",ro LL f jo ./ 1 .\ I ~G' , - p/ \ 4 \ N \ \ 1 , . , - 1% 7943 /. 1 +-\ N \ 3,7Wl.41 a -i w - 5 FIRE PIT \ *S,TONE TERRACE 1 \ 3 % 11. . m 49 I. .0 -444-zÂ» 2 ~ 4 O a L Â· y,-219*- 'Ak' 4 \40 rL .. / i , 45 - - . t- 4 '/ * A ~ / 1 ,Â·Â· ~.4+24 \3E& I - O - 41> \36 ROARING FORK RIVER O 4,6,00 - .... . ... 9.-- \Ai:izek 9 ,' 2 LT=-0->-r-:0612Â·,4. - Â·Â·~ $ j t \\ 4-:I' .--141- t.,2,<bi,<zi-- LANDSCAPE eUILDING ENVELOPE m.) 1 ATTACHMENT 1 0 ... --*-- L 0 - \-9--4-- , .\ . \ EX!STNGE[>GEOFRIPARWI - Â· j = I -"- - 7_ - - /4 i I -8 VEGETATION - 4 T - *Â»- . I - $ 3 *424 M A. ~ / U- , 1~ 1 - . 1 -3 ..1 1 13%4* 14:134 C-----------) 49 . \. 4 4/2 1 - I I \11-220 - I + .3 1 I , 'h ) , 44* - Â·:Â· 1. ' 2:* 'CONC CURB Â·I \ % 4 P 1 7-hURf,fER \ 3 \ N ~1\ 1 I \\\. & I ROARING FORK RIVER . V BIKE PATH - ..\ . 20 40 \ I ./ .\ 11 1 \1.... , g I ... \ iSEJE WEÂ· -5 REAS:ONS i i ... 9\ : j \\\ Â¥_ DATE DESCRiPDON \ '' 1. 1 / 1.1 N ./ \U-tf// -- \\ 4 9 NI' - 1 1 \11 / r - - I / \\ 0 DRAWN - REVEWED- . 11 - BUILDING ENVELOPE - Sk.41TAnoN'iSTRUPROPERTY --~ 9, *- --- 1 Stream Margin 1 - The defined building envelope is divided Into each of the foDowing Review 1 - 8reas ARCHITECTURAL BUILDING ENVELOPE Contains bulk!ing and ~~ hardscape. and terraces LANDSCAPE ENVELOPE: Contains grading and other landscape features 143\ PROjECT 'UNBER 2748 Site & i e A t ition Grading Plan 0 1 foll\-7 3: L2-1 1 4 1 1 1 ty, 1 $ 1 0 1 - 1 1 0 1 0 MON ... C 009801 ~ +" #.' ~'- 390Â®~ ... - H.ly'ill ROJECTS_A-88/ Res,dence*[) CAD\OW-BELL- Sheet-Stream Margln Review dvi,g Q i * i * Â®00 ZONE B - Ornamental Plants: DESIGNWORKSHOP ' ZONE C - Wildflower sod mix to be used in upland stnam margin: A..r - - Dcape Archa,cture â€¢ Land manning * '9Â¥-4Wt i -r[*imi :ig 4''k, "ll'I-~,Igi,gâ€¢ ,:Il ~El,-ilu ADI Fil-- 1-1,4- ItLJ & I.rkillÂ¥; 131Nfl---j~~Â£~~~~~t Urbin Design â€¢ Tourisrn Planning 1,"11111 r 1 KF I ~ In. itill- - 4 - - -- - . 1,0.-/0 â€¢ .ma Fe â€¢ Te~,pe Â· LaR, 7... Foil -' I r,lir z .' -6 I - ...Â· ./â€¢Â·â‚¬. I- -=.- .l .*,eâ„¢......,. De.......,0/ 1 0 1 --ill. - 1 -1 - 120 East Main Street Yclk,/Emn. Summel Shelter . Sun- Aral, alpjna While Re:k Cre45 (970*925-8354 i Acerglibrum Rockyhlounm Maple PAC 5-25 I 5.600- 10500Â· Aspen. Colorado 81611 1': Cyrnc Shade Facsimile (970) 920-1387 NIATNE PLVITS r. ZONEB ORNAMENTALAND WW WDESIGN.ORKS'OPCOM . Aquilegia Â¢0Â¢rul Colorado Columblne FAC.W Blue/Whi. Summer 1-3 n None . Stin 7.000Â·12.500+ Auc*b,ge}ovi~ ./. Aster Raccm, A,ter Aspcrula edorala Sweet #ajff Ble, Early Summe, 05.Ift Food l'I Sun- 4.(Â«,Â·R.500Â· p,amflroida Whi 'Pland Aster , f Lupt- *ntu. 5,]ky LOF'Oe BlueAVhie. Su~n]ncr iD , ft Nope Ful) Sun 5.ODD.1 3.000' I Bily a m,Ati.i.Ti.i~ Dist,t !.!Int./M (Gllium odoratum) Floâ€¢ler Shidc .ranium .C U Pink/Lavender Su~imel . Sun ,/ce,ful'us Pranc Asier 1.2/ Food 5.3(09,4(xy i#Â· A,ta Cy,ne h. 44:-râ‚¬ :01"... %\ , ..1-/'91#74 -At : ENVELOPE RkÂ·emc r'r --/144Â«AÂ«ff'\4 ./ ' 1 :t ZONE C. NATIVE - A r- LANDSCAPE BultDING Mohonil repem Ore,on Gnape Holly Â¥ellow. Spring- 0.5-! 5 I Ix>d .-Fuli ..50& 10.(MID' ~ Campani./*paula Tuss.k Bellnower 1 +I. WILDFLOWER./ \ :: ~~ZON~A ~Tr~ ,_**fl#efpw.cAkILÂ· /,/4 E'A~Ei.~â€ž5 Raceme Summer Sun ' -- 1--4 4.J-7----=C:=4='Af510 -29@ReÂ£..:LE~&,Se/U< 03Â¥9>Â§~ 4 / : - - p.,:hysmna Mountain L.ver Folia"/h/b . Full 3.4 I ; ChÂ¢,ranthu. altion/ Si...sn W.'fle-er \ 1 - 1.-1~-1 1-~J ..9Â£5~Â¥*'rf~ 4 l F zoâ€¢e c NATIVE .u-OFLOWEA MX lum .& r .min,Ics / 1 -= 2~4--t.42 -:-Â·.Â·~C-,its,3':,. :. /\ r- ZONE A -DVE UPLAND PLANT Corymb Sun 1 Chrysanihemum \1 Phy,ocarpus Mountain NinebArk FAC.U While. Sum,ner 37/ Food. Shelter PI Full 4.800 9.900Â· muil'.D Shasu Daisy 1 1 RESTonATION opolifo],us i 4 - ..e-,7 ..C ,..71.A... 2. ->iÂ·.-L'f'-Â·ACPÂ·Â·V~ 'L/% / // RESTOR~nON(TOPROVIDEBANK / / Â»' ZONE o: NATrvE w/n-0 PLANT Polcm<Â»,iurn caeruleum locobâ€¢s L.adder FAC Powder Blic. brly Summ 1 -2 ft None 14 Sun 6.(]00Â·10.000+ I CO'Opsis laneel/ umÂ·leafcd -reopsis i , F-1.3234.4ic,j >Â·I<Â·,8Â·:4.-*%>6Â«yip.,s~t Xt, sÂ»o~,0,~ 3 Cvme i 1 - 1 1 ti. -1 -1, 7 2 \ Poleolillah=ic= Shrubby Yellow, Sunun~ 2-4 / Full Sun 7.000-10.DocÂ· ~ Diinthos Ultoids &*nks C) 1 \ Cinqu/oil Flower 1 . -11 4 0 . \\ Rubusparviflor. Thi mi)let.m E.C Whi,e~ Summer 3.7 ft Food . lin 7.000.101000 ~ Echiuaccapulpurea purp' cooenower ~ ... Spring Cyme Spira. Vanhoune Spirea OBL White. 7-10/ Food Ful] Sun 4.000-7.5{JO' Engeron specious . Asren Daisy vaohoultei Flour I 0,~eye Dilisy Whie 0/ \ Rudbeckia him Black-eyed Susan AT WATERÂ·S EDGE ~mt>Â©24241\ \ BANI< RESTO~TION -- 6.- 0 - - . I FF :A _ leucalilÂ»urn Sal,ia farin~cea Biue Sage \ Aower Early Summer 1-2 fi Full Sun i---------- 0 \ ZONE D - Bank we land kstontion (Be ow top of slope): i Percnnial tllillar{lia %-I. .- 4/2-ILSâ€¢lt:1.'Â£1 j \L rÂ·li.'ly**:2Â· ~~M!*49Â· 44%4 67#&4 -7 15Â¢~99;,7 vt#*P't't' 'w/, LL 'Â·'Ni;AmWâ€¢*i' -Â·E'Â·;Â£*9<'r'Â· ,Â· .WF.T;:. 118;9/98'd24 -- -- 1' '7 -00ri.'tr-Â·v~â€ž.7 Â·.. Â·Â·Â·i Gailla,diaantis,mi. l 1 BANK RESTORATION th. \. ZONEE'F NATIVE -7.Â· Blue Fla, 1 #3 \ l,9Â«7--6. : 11*te 7,Â·'<+C,-I~"KWAV%, 1~'~a: . -' Â·' ' Alnus enu,folia ThinÂ·Wilder FAC.W Red'.wn, Summci to'Oft Food. .-Full 5.000 10.0(JO' Upilius argenieus Z Win S~Â·03!121 Sua Shrwy Evening I Fun sun 430/3.0(/ ./Invoic **** 2 Anâ„¢mwi.//num Rnsey Pussion FAE Pink, Early Summer 3 in-1 fi N(me Fal,age D Pope 4 Corni stolen/en RedÂ·Osie, Dor,â„¢d FAC.W White. Sp,inpÂ· 3-10 fi Food . Sun 4 (00-10.000' Papâ€¢va nudkaute lectal' [3OLORADO -UE SPRUCE YO BEE Cyme Summer Shade - i SpringÂ· . Pen,/mon /ncit, ROcky Mamiain '-, PLANTEDONSUIITAT~ON'~STRICT . (3'.,..\4\ I - _/ .RM WIâ„¢ SANITATION DISTRICT 1./ .s mi.'ne./ Rocky Mounuin los OBL Blet Sunir.ier 0 5-1,7 I None Full Sul 3.500-,0.000 1 7~U D3aR[Pir.4 Raceme Besi from bulb, ;UnCUS MliCUS Sahic kush FAC.W BrowrVBbck. /3 3-4 R Food. Full Sun boo ll Doo k *la cornui. Jehnn> jump up Pan,cle Shette, Silly Golde'le , jÂ·21>. =p----- , Juncusce'llus Colof@Jo Rusb FAC.W 1/gh, Brown. nia 3 1./.7 8 /mi[cd Food. Full Sun 5.000Â·11.500+ . - ' paincle Shelter Unicera Twinber,y FAC.U Plnk/While Late Spling 3-5 ft Shell.Â·r ShadeÂ· 7....!12.) - involucral Honey,uckle Rac'me . Sun 1 \4\ Ribes aurcurn Goldin CurT* PAC.W Yellow. .mer 3.8 ft 'For/ M Sun 4,000Â·8.000Â· &- Spnne \\ \44 ATTACHMENT // Rou, woods,i W.ods Ro- FAC Pink. 1.57 I ...F//1 . Ful Sun 3.300 jo 500 : C>lne Summer Populus an/itifolia NarrowÂ·Leaf FAC Cltamy While. 'pring 25-65 ft Shellc, . Full Sun ./.8 5(1/ 1 ....wood Calkin i t 1 0 1 ZONE A - Bank upland restriration (About top of slope) | ZONE E - Bank restoration at water's edge: DRAWING KEY .=wi' :*Aâ€žp +* ,.. *63: i ILY unr: - '--- - - 1 -LIEi ITI, 11 - li'ET -1 lfI-1 l~E.- - _ - 24 1=4 E ..1 - -- - - - ' 1/11- 19111, FFTME LIF11 11-1 0 linl llÂ·+ I lt}IT 111=t,tll,h 1 --1. 11+ , IrriiÂ·H r riÂ¥- 1-4,-Â·rl - -,1=1-iF 11Â£14)11-51,WillÂ¥ 1Â¥ff nlili~ 'Miqi-iÂ· 1-1+qTG-4 1 -T# r.14 1 01 11% U . 48 -- 2 - i"-11EI ll 1 - : - 1 - - -f-tr' 1 3111:11* .=*1 -Lirt O: .. ~trin-IJ= . - -~ ZONE A: NATIVE UPLAND PLANT RESTORATION = -â€¢t=@2 t- . I-' -= r . : 1-Elâ‚¬ 1 + L-_21 - . - 4 - E911.71 Ametarchic, Mountain FAC.l ./. Spring 3 1, fl F// P,-Full 5,00/10.000' Berulaglanchdosa Boe Birch OBI. C~ean,y Whi[c. 1 =ilÂ¢ Soninkr 1-Â·1 f, Food /-/11 7.0/11.400Â· ....0 Sen ice.ny Racm Sheltri gui Catki, Shcle' NORâ„¢ 0 10 20 . EEKLI ZONE & ORNAMENTAL AND NATIVE PLANTS SponÂ¥Â· SpIke I Corn/, sle;enifera Rtd Os,er Do?/0Â»1 FACW Whiic, 3Â·10 ft Fwd ShadeÂ· 4.000-10,000' Care, aqualihs ...Sedge OBL Green/Black .a 0 3-3 ft 111Â»3 Fult Sun 6,00./.500 Cyme Pt Sun ISSUE DATE Ne-mhâ€¢,r 5 7001 i ./.15 Â£ Dr>opler, S (06Â»00 Mak 1-5.8 3 11 Shellcr . Sun- Carli utricula/ Beaked Sed@e OBL .,1/In>wn. I. 1.-1 I leÂ©d Full Sum 6 5 00 11 000Â· # DATE DESCRIPTION GEE] ZONE C: NATIVE WILDFLOWER MIX fil,iÂ·mas Shade Spike Phy,-rpus .~un.inN'nebark FAr U While. Summe. 3.7 fi FOK/. .-11. 4,800.9.900Â· DechamB T,ifted Ha,4~ass OBt. Yellow/ Con] Sea,on' 2-3 I ./. .Â·Ful (Â«114,000 - - Op.1/0111,3 Con':nb Shelter Sul ...... Brown. Sun - , 1 ~ ZONE D. NATIVE WETLAND PLANT ENHANCEMENT , Picea ./.il (010.11 Blue S,CKe FAe- 10!ile Spn. /10011 Food. Full Sun 61"en:ni hyemale Ommon Scolling Rusli .C.W Spring 3.3 I None ShideÂ· 5.01Â»-8.50(JÂ· 1.2 %~irnl:.r ./= .lue. Full Sun Pine, per~eresa Pt,nder./ Pine ~ellri~/Red She]ter Full Sun 5~ooIl.000~ .crtensia liliati Strells,de,/piX OBL. SulnmeT .3 I '006 . Sum 5.50/11000 50Â·10'oft FAC.W Panicl '1.0 Bluebells EarlY Fali 1 -' * 1 ZONEE&F: NATIVE BANK RESTORATION AT WATER'S Pills ...... ...Chern FACC WI:,le. Spnng 5 3rJ f Foot[ .Â·Full 4 500Â·10.000Â· ...M/col. R:ky Mountal Wiliow C,-m, White 5pling 5 [lf, ... Full Sun 5300 1// L___*Â· .1 EDGE Shelter Sul C.kin R*eine hrly Sunimet DRAWN REVIEWEr Seigs anitus Populus N.Inâ€¢w Ld PAC I .In.... Spn. 2~65 I Sheiter P, Full 6,000-8.500' (Sehoenoplcclui .stern Bulrush OBL Bruâ€¢n. n/: 3 ID h Food Ful! Sun 3.300 11 500 , Iii'us.folia Colt-d Glkin Sun .... Unnbel 25-50/ . sun 5,ODD [O.000' ~Schoenopleelus (Â·ommon ThreÂ¢square Se..'lle" Stream Margin Pâ€¢>Pulus (>Jaking A~pen FAC Cream' ' hile Spring Fral OBL lcd/B.... ./ .4 fi Poor FÂ»d Flitt Sun 3,;00 8.5.Â· ite,m,loide, Calkin Sheller Comp~Panicle Pugen,) .bel Goo~m Green IMI 34 D Food . Sun 2.500Â·',000' Review Suinmer Roil lood .'*s Rose ./ P. ~pfing- 2 7 ft 91)". Fd h Full Sun 3.500-10.500' PROJECT NUMBER 274 ,./. SUN= Sali' (lit,Inniâ€¢>ndsWÂ·illâ€žu FAC./ Breuni'BIW SprIng 7 20 I Fo(â€¢1 Full Sun 6 000 1 1 000' druinmfinjian. Ca(kin Landscape 0 Symphon/86/ f @bus 5,inwben) FAC.C Whi... Surn}ner 2-5 fi FcÂ©d Shade 'Â»7* , Planting Plan Fkue, Full Sun L3-1 SHEETNUMBEn (JB.L.Obli,-,FAC Â· f.<'1Â¢An. I .Uf,W L'â€¢.1.1d , ~Ell e 01,4,â€¢ic. FAC = Facukri, ~~ W - WeÂ·11:nd U ~ lipland S * OaÂ¥80100'NadSV aNÂ¥1 AOVHS 1 ~5/ 4. 1 1- 1 . DESIGNWORKSHOI Urban De+gn â€¢ Tourism Planning Landscape Architectum Â· Land Plannin ./.que ...pen â€¢lilli â€¢ ./.0,1 5.0 Paul - Swo Fe Â· Tempt. L=k, Te~oe . Fo, 120 East Main Street Aspen, Colorado 81611 (970>-925-8354 0- PROPOSED RESIDENCE Facsimile (970) 920-1387 PROF'OSEDGRADE W.WIE SIGNWORKSHO P./0 EXISTING COTTONWOODS TO ---~ ,3Â»ga_~ 4 17 REMAIN .\ yr EXIS-rING GRADE 1/ 1 80--E -< 5 - 1 U - . 1 1[ f + 7949.83 YFI0 1 . 03~ -- - 4\;\\\01 v. 14\1/+-At-14Â«tuL.~&Lit404142DQi#dgial ' 13< 5,7 4 "In. !41 -.11 - ''1' tm'-**2424.694Â·. NÂ«~ --vi .Â» 4 4 W /\ I 1 VA.'. /12; - . Â·Â·Â· . t~L Â»02&Â¢~a,pwrifaria 1 .Â·:Â·.t- ~1?~.-:-/*4*#34,4-~#+~'YVM/ P - -4f.2 3 ~--1.4<11. 1.1.-16.11-:~,1 f.<--11- 11-2.411.-4...1.:-2 -. 90~Â·.12~ij~.,(~-~.11~4.--Â·:43~-~ilâ‚¬~9.bi<-~:Â·Â·Jf,Â·-Â·. .-...,-. :~.%. ::;~Â·f?.f:~Â·..>Â· ~i~;~{-~ :)-:i..4444-~t~-~ittf~-Â·~ffit<fifttlt-:,4., f'i~23%1*13 @ . ... 1 - . -%. - 7 9Â·;'Â·Â·Â·.t.2.1.03Â·â‚¬Â·Â·.........:Â·hz:-73Â£2>.('COn'*0%-4 rÂ© SITE SECTION A ORIGINAL SCALE yle'=140- U- --POSEDRESIDENCE d E-Va~eb..... EXIST<GRADE MEETS ~ PROPOSED GRADE 4FFE 79505 - . u. 4 Autdift --u-_ EXISTING GRADE & , -U m 5.- / \4Â¢L Iffv ,-* 4/9--- - V 15$&,bel?,14 * 4 _11 1 . 1 /01.6 0. M.ve . : T= m.:E:..-ION-OR.Att' Â· / ATTACHMENT / 1 i ! Â® 1. 1 i< 1 | a . 1 1. . 1 , . 1 . - . 1 11 . 1 - 12 - . ... .: / b ,6,0.r ' Â® SITE SECTION B 1 - EVERGREENPLANTNG 47. i - EXISTINGGRADEMEETS 140 4 r PROPOSED GRAIE EXISTINGGRADEMEETS &- PROPOSED GRADE , ~ 41* 'AÂ¥'60,2,~*91/ ~-- RED UOUrrAIN ROAD * 1 . H:|. AxailÂ©Â·VT<f--f,*t* , ' r , 14.-1- ~ 9 2 :8..Ah.La/--W - . . 7-'-2~ 1, WL .--- ISSUE DATE: November 9 ?001 # DATE DESCRIPTION .. . , REVISIONS 1 I I '1 , 1- Jf - ' . 1 - 585 4 -}h 1,11 -z>-\=.w'- / . . Â· ~--:,42,â€¢sT,46~pIE '-. ..~Â· - :~~ . 'Â·'Â· 1,Â·2'Â·1;7-2.,fÂ·:il'.Â·, . 1 1- .1 . .. . ..~.'.,~~..,- : EX]STING PONDEROSA PINE - 70 REMAN *24011. ~/tw.~. --:Of... h ..... DRAWN RE'AEWED Stream Margin Review PROJECT NUMBER 2740 - -- .1 ....... . 1. . .. , ':1:.1 .:. .. , 1 1 - Â· 1. 2Â· Site 5 e 7/ . Sections 1 Â§ Â® SITE SECTION C SHEET Nt-ER C}R!<3~NALSCALE ./isÂ·=1-7 L4-1 1 2 1 - 1 0 1 k. 1-1 3 1 1 1 '6 * 2 8 Occâ€¢Â·â€¢Â·râ€¢Â·or.G-- â€¢ .c ue,N Hlew. te 30N30IS3k1 1138 1138 N331100 9 G OaVBO100'N3dSV 3NV1 ADVHS F:\PROJECTS A.L,lell Residence\D. CAO,DWÂ·BellÂ·Mode#-Seclk,ni.dwg 0, laiÂ®1 DESIGNWORKSHOP Urban Dislgn â€¢ Tourism Plinning Landscape Architecture Â· Land Planning 4 w 4//4",0,0 . -419". D"wtÂ· jack,/R 5ae Pmdo â€¢ 90* hâ€¢ T-pe . LA' Tahoe . Vail 120 East Main Street Aspen, Colorado 81611 (970*925-8354 Facsimile (970) 920Â·-1387 WWWDESIGNWORKS~OPco~ - \ 1Â« \ 1 1 1 \ f .71 J \\.iÂ¢ r \ \ 0Â· -37 0 1 >10 -71/ 2Â»Â« //1 /1/ 1 :U \ - ill -1 %-3 -1 i i li 0 + %01 - -9. \ - - /,0 -A />4 - A T.Q N \ <99:04%-CA \ 0 2 irt 91 ~- ARCHITECTUR \ I. '4.'b: .Trill: I--A.A LL \ BU~DING ENVELOPE -(13 i Wi Z 4 -- - - Ill . s 2 4**vit Â· 9 \\ 41\ 1 -\ 1---\ P~ - lA i -d#fl - -- / ,- C 1<43 -x' A Of \ 57 \ 19Â»0*094' f 2 y.'M V~-- . Â«/ A / ' rwi, ~ 9-_iii-Vt'.732<bil J <c \ L - 434 1 e 0 \ - 1'4949-C< 1 -Â· 1, 1 9 4, \ t \ I I j.t, -- 1 1, := t.,5,= . % ./ f \ \ / \lap>l 1 1 1 ' . /71 \ /. %41 1 -',:45'<ift P~1 4%4//06 -- , 9 1 Â»71 \ 1 14 xi--Jf~426~Z.-Â·tft.Lw-ra*HEA~10<2 :-4# ' Â£ - t 1 / 1 - - - - ATTACHMENT j 3 1- , I -d \ -%. --4 0 13.1 Â¥ - r 4 \ 1 . I. d \. I. -EXISTING VIAN , N / VEGETATION EDGE ~ 1 4 v L_~--n 144 A V i \ / -C 4--V---~ \ I I EN<op' 1 - . / ..li \ 4 ... \ '\ A-- 1 1 1 49 >ke 1 i N\\ \ 4 aF-271 423 *x % 4 J>14-u~_- , \ 1 V. , .2,\ h i NORâ„¢ 0 0 20 40 ISSUE DATF Now,mi:e. S. 2001 \ 1 â€¢ REVIS/ONS I # DATE OESCRF.ON \ il\*\\ N -- DRAWING KEY \ 1 1 42 , -- I ~ Existing Healtly Tree Remo- 1 Total L ,/ '. . \ 6 - ~ Existing Tree in Decune Removed 12 Total (2 or the 12 are in C' ~ severe decline and are a safety hazzard) \ 3 OR.* REVEWED \\\IÂ» 12 -2~/~23<] Ensting Hardscape/ Grass Within 100Â· Setback Â· 17.575 SF Stream Margin Review Proposed Hardscapel Grass Within 100' Setback- 8.700 SF Hardscape/ Grass area has been reduced by 8 875 S F PROJECTNUMBER 27~ Existing Grade and Vegetation to Remain,nthis area Natw Plant revegetation and restoralion to occur ir, selected areas as \ Site shown on the planting plan 26,800 SF Total 1 3 Mitigation 0 i R S....... L5-1 \ 00Â¥hl0100'NBdSÂ¥ 3NV1 AGVHS F./ROJECTS_AÂ·LI/ Res,denceD CAD\DW-BELL-SiTE ANALYSIS dwg .. ATTACHMENT 1 4 Â§ 8 7950 7970 : 02 7960 7940 2 / --~/- WA~R 7930 7950 w / SECTION F . // 1 = 10' 0 / & 7940 Â£ m - *-$ WATER 7930 SECTION A 1 - 10 8 7950 33 g8 F h 7970 2 2~ 2 -m 7940 7960 W "im ~ 7930 M e//// SECTION G 1 - 10 M 7950 --0/-- 5 // 88 M ~ e 7940 / 7960 7/ -- 7950 7930 SECTION B 1 = 10 , 7940 / -Toi 7930 SECTION D 1 - 10 "5 25 5 4 -5 0 2 (1 7960 7950 2 6 3 05:5/ em ,r- 7950 - 7940 2 11 --- -32Â»55 5/ @// 7940 7930 WATERi / -- SECTION E 1 ill' 7930 SECTION C NOTE: ALL SECTIONS LOOKING DOWNSTREAM 1 = 10 P~P~D Ef ASPEN SURVEY ENGINEERS, INC. M SOUTH ....I .TREET ~SPEN. C. 0 8411 PHONE/FAX (.70) gil-3816 SHEET 2 OF 2 DATE .6 2/01 28(Z FLOD PUUN NI'rid 0013 NlrId 0013 r.. Andrew Antipas /<.i,/ 47&_ Ecological & Environmental Consulting, LLC . ATTACHMENT 11/14/01 Alice Davis Davis Horn, Inc. 215 S. Monarch Suite 104 Aspen, CO 81611 Reference: Bell Residence Stream Margin Review Red Mountain Road, Aspen Dear Ms. Davis, On November 7, 2001 I visited the Bell Residence at the intersection of Red Mountain Road and Shady Lane in Aspen, Colorado. A light rain was falling and temperatures were in the 50's. The proposed project is to construct a new home on this site. Photos of the project area are attached to this letter. Determination I have reviewed Aspen City Planning Code Section 26.68.040, and this project is consistent with the Stream Margin regulations. This project will not impact riparian vegetation or wetlands along the Roaring Fork River. There is a sharp topographic break, which defines the top of bank for the Roaring Fork River in the project area (Figure 1 and Photo 1). This topographic break also defines where the landscaped yard ends and where the riparian vegetation begins. Historically, the project area would have fallen within the riparian zone of the Roaring Fork River. However, all that remains of this plant community are mature cottonwood trees. It appears that the cottonwoods were thinned when the existing house was built, and the riparian understory vegetation was replaced with turf grass (Photo 2 and 3). This thinning and understory removal occurred throughout the flatter portions of the property. The steep riverbank appears to be left relatively undisturbed. However, the construction and maintenance of the Harris irrigation ditch, which parallels the river, have also caused regular disturbance within the riparian zone. The construction of Red Mountain Road appears to have disturbed the north edge of the property. The uneven distribution of road fill characterizes this portion of the property (Photo 4). 0285 Crystal Circle, Carbondale, CO 81623 970-963-8297 aantipas@sopris.net Wetland Investigation No wetlands were observed in the project area. The routine criteria as described in the Army Corps of Engineers 1987 Delineation Manual was utilized for the investigation. The 1987 manual utilizes the three parameters of vegetation, soils, and hydrology to identify wetlands. No hydrologic indicators were observed and no hydric soil was present. Cottonwood trees can and do occur in wetlands, but this site is well drained. The river and Harris ditch are providing the moisture necessary to support the cottonwoods. Thank you for the opportunity to provide ecological consulting services. If you have any additional questions, please do not hesitate to call. Very truly yours, 444% Andrew Antipas < 1. 1 . 1 V DESIGNWORKS![OP Landacap, ArchllectuÂ·, , L.Jnd Plannin' Urban Design . reurlim Plaimino |'Â·I'll'4'~ â€¢ 1"v. Â· J.â€¢14:. â€¢ 4, /,1 TRâ€¢. 9, ' 4. I 120 East F.â€¢gin Stmet Aspen. Colorado 8161 1 (970)-925Â·8354 Facsimile (970) 920- 1387 : .*.....OLOSTONE . ~ ....... Â·,A~EAVAiâ€ž~-6 Â·Â·-Â· *gN.49 444 ., Â·VATE,1 .'AL'.E . -'.NZ ... 7 't 425#4 -- . I . L Â·oÂ°*~,ILE.:>- sY\pp ,*-1-,1 -171 2/ SEWER. u m 4. , / ~...9,4*~ M..9Â¢ ... .. Irr /// .-rn -6 \\\ 4. / ...1 \. / I .1 \ 1 . . - rÂ»3/,0 o L ilw.siaRMER -74.Â· \ - 1 1 1 -EEL--ZE. 1 4. : 's. _ Se--*-1- to \ ~ 1 P'VE"ENT C ...3 *4.' * I . I ... A \ -1 *.-* ---- *---<-. \ I. \ I . _Â·PI /0. :.0 E . I.--1 \ ..1. Â«11 \ 7 r-- 10. No EL \ I I ./00/,0, 1 . 80/ ~EHâ€žE.Ao .Tule J- . ... \ .' Alif, I --// . '... ..., 1 1 -,Â»lart. ci . ..0. \ \ I 2. ~71Â£'ty' 1 0 41.- :7 I M kiLE 1. .1 e . -- ..#4*/ 1 . -- \ \ LIli 2~ rhÂ»Val. Â· - , 4 <'' *OPi 7 0 ' '. 1Â»GE...02-1\0.4/ &21?'r'.'. 7.. -" ..~ >.2:<~,.;~ *~t*9; 129/ \ / 9.....h \ -1 A a: 0 3/ ' 4/.'1 01-2983/ orÂ·~ .* :Acyt#*A .*;44 7 4-. 0 - ' 'le .--05 \ ...24(,1 . 1. 12 - :â‚¬066 '7~{*99*: - \ ,Â»...1)' ....ID ( ..4. , 0 4* I. i .. CLEAr.OUT 'â€¢'ArD'th I - - I- &CAP /4. \ % .4. H , -r - A . \ 1- - -i- --J . .. / . ,-7.7 1 ' Riparian Zone -. - 0,0. 1 1 - I 4% tfIGH Â·.YA TER 7 .- 1 +M I r<L I- -I .\..!. 9% / I . 7 9% \7 - 0 0 \ -9.- -1. 7.41:Â· U 81, ~Â» - I lr....Ir}. *Â·4 -2 . i -x :// 94 '34 ROARING FORK RIVERÂ· , r , Â·3-n . 94. 1 \.h g51<% \ 0. 2 ./. I ~ 1 M..1Â·ty.* - Â«6.. Â·i> ~ :. --- l . *â€¢ â€ž.\4 / *â€¢-Â·@2- \ - ~ I ~i iiÂ·Â·Â·f.- 7>Â·.;-2J?*~2..ffflit. - 'j- ~~ ~ ~ ~~~~~~~~~f~-CI,,i . ~ Roaring Fork River --*. Â·Â·Â·6 4 Â· ; ... 04. Â« iÂ·-Â·4 Â«4 + Lu v r a.4.0 . 4 - r -.=.1-JÂ»t 1 '% ./ ' . 4- #.. I.* :,-\9 -+1 - -- - - --~- - -- .,., ~,1~ / ..61 thi f~- 1 '- ~%. gÂ·: . -' 6, 1 \ - \ b . wk- \ ' - \ \ . 4 ...3,P!,IC,l:tr,i:R . 9 ~. .34. 3%....2\ 4. . .2 6. 6 â€¢... 4 ' \ .. i>rt.... o \ ... \ I 4.-ls.'.S # PATE DiSCRIPTIC' \ \*.3 Harris Ditch \- I.%\ . , .,;,6>-....1 .' 44 I . \,\ ,< , \ -- .......U~*t %211,: ./fl 1, "00 - - / ----- --- 1 . / \ - - . - '/ E.%FO i / .. CQA.'.N - / _ p,- 1 Stream Margin Review - Existing Conditions \ , a / , Figure 1 1 1 , 1 1 9 1 9 3ON30IS 1138 1138 N331 06Â¥U0100 'N3d SV 3NV1 ADVHS F /HOJECTS A-L'13. Rewdcroy.L) CADDW BELL Sheet-Sweanâ€¢ Ma,wn Rt,view dâ€¢g \ i â‚¬ ./ f 1 1. . 4 i , 1 1/1. ' 1 41 , 1 1 141. < -r - .- - .2 - 221'9Â·45NqLg,Â·tu,*, ~ -1 - . A.,4.5*9/45*7$-9,6 -- k 1 Â» f 4 7.1,1.- 269Â». 'Ze.. Photo 1. Looking west at the top of bank, which defines the boundary between the riparian vegetation and the landscaped yard. .r Â£ - , I + 1 L Ii, 1 ./. t_- 7 - - 2- â‚¬ 4%,fâ‚¬ i *=,2 1 '-44: Â· 4~4;~~~~Â«44448.~.â‚¬Ik-; ~ li~ r'â‚¬ I - 1 Photo 2. L,ooking sotitli from the .6Olltheast corner of the house. 4 9.,1.0! bit, di .0 1 '. ,4 1 + i f .3- -2 4 .1 ... . E - 2.- 0 U 1 1 1 7 - - I ../Fgalgadpt Â·'6 UV" ./ I. N.2 '- k,~.._-73%'Â£V,Jit~~Â£- - A7Â»1514: - 4&1%2A--1: 4-tÂ·IÂ© 72. --,t.2~3.-" i -42.1:f.~1 -,lj?f~ 32'.92 - 1 --C -tÂ« 1=1* ../.4 t- Photo 3. Looking east. Note the northeast corner of the existing house and the mowed turf grass. It j . / 4. l. ,/ 1 t 81 11 1 M :I- 1 - ripe - 2 - 4 1,-. UJ. u D 1Â· . rE 4 --4 . ~ ~- 74-2 - . -'iâ€¢fE# Â· .,1 -â‚¬ i Photo 4. Looking north towards Red Mountain Road. The ptioto illtistrates lile clisturbed natilre of this area Lls a result of the construction of the roadway. ATTACHMENT A . - ASPEN/PrrICIN COMMUNITY DEVEUDPMENT OEPARTMENT Mille- for r....1 ofâ‚¬:ley er A... D.,lop-,11 4,4,11,â€¢tion Fees CITY OF ASPEN (-iu- CrrY) .d _800[104-fbck-LU- (Brid +44Â£171 80{ ~) 0,Crein*fU, APPLICANT) AGREE AS Fol.Lows. J 1. APPLICANTh. sub.ilted:o CRY.napplicatlon f. , 01&1.â€¢br. TimpAO,ECn-atimm marj 1 n 2Â£v,du) -- 0 APPLICANT u.dersiattd; Rad agreâ€¢, tal City of Aspen Onli,1.,ce No 49 (Seric. of }001) citablishes â€¢ fbi nructur, fo, Land Use oppliÂ¢21]ons ind th, payinent ofall proces,ing fus 15 3 condition Precident 10 0 le"Wininal/" Of."plk/MOR Cilit'.8/U 1 APPLICANT md CITY 44, 0.1 beerne of Llic *IM, nant,0 w sgopi of the proposed projoct. R 5 not posible u this time 10 21Â¢18*in *C filll Imar of th. cow inpolved in p.,visin, 0,8 â€¢p,licalion. APPLICANT und CrrY !6:lher ..re. tlwt it i: m thÂ¢ intemt of the partiu Th* APPLICANT make psyment of In blial dep** Id I *miear Ponâ€¢lt addrtion.1 com to k bilid W APPLICANT en D molidly b-8. APPLICANT *p- addiliesâ€¢1 20-moyaccruc following their hoaring; ind/w .,oval.. APPLICANT apees hi â€¢11! be benefited by rmimim; Drit= ca,h liquidiry and will mike *dirional paymints Upm, 110{1f-ion by the CITY whâ€¢,1 Ihey up Mell-y - Costs uo ingurred CJ rY a,tres ir â€¢411 be ben.fitcd Arough the grtate, cemjmy of recovenâ€¢; its full coots lo Fwin APPUCANTS opplication 4. CrrY - APPLICANT former apee thâ€¢ 11 is imp,acticable for CITY *11 00 oompl- Pensing or pribitt .mciall in,brmation to The Pleming Commit,ion â€¢naor City Council:o Mable b IN;nnint Commi:sion and/Or Cky COWnÂ¢11 to mike 14*Ity Â¢eqwired finding: for project considult,on. unles, curftnt billings =C,-4 i. Cull,iof- billm. 3. Tbaref=. APM.!CANT *grecs thot in considetion of 04 CITY'% wihir of ng nIM 10 COUIC[ full fkS Prior B . dt9F'*-hon of appllition complcion,m, APPLICANT :130 J] poy na ink lal doposit in thÂ¢ mount of S 1 3fg' whishis fbr - 6, hours of Communily Developmem *ff limc, and if ectull meorded -sts 're':A *0 6.,1ial do.it, ApiirleART shall pay odditional monthly Wninl, 10 CITY 10 Mimbum thÂ« C]TY ro, 111Â¢ p,94*13,01 of th, applkation mentionwd ebovc. incloding pon opproval r:vicw Such periodic pipal- 0,11 bim~ wlihin )O days of *â€¢ biUitic dott AN].ICANT {Ubhc, Â¥ocs thal fhikire to ply woh crued cestâ€¢ â€¢hall b. 0-:140 for,w.,In- of pr-,6,g, and in no cale will building pir:nit. A. illutd Until all CO,lf 11*OCiated with cue Pooce:*10: have bcâ‚¬n p.d * 1 105 Plannim CITY OF ASPEN . - J ,-- ArrLIC.., Roarin- Fork, Li-C n. 7Â»e AL < ind k. Jyl 4 24% 294 510.thw ag'Â«t -(br 614* CORMI J.. Alm W..h 641 1 C-m-Hy D-â€¢lopment Dly.rt,r / Dâ€¢â€¢:U 11-1 -01 Marting Address. An B 17(0 - -300 Puppy Smith *imE En.uppe'tvorm,WIrply..dot SuiÂ·k. 103 1 2/27/99 43/#4 UO' 8 '10,1 ANACHMENT /7 Rearing Fork LLC Bradley â€¢nd Colleen Bell c/o Fred Smith, Authorized Representative P.MB 276 300 Puppy Smith Street, Suite 203 Aspen, Colorado 81611 November 6,2001 James Lindi Aspen Pitkin Canty Development Department 130 South Galena Street Aspen, CO 81611 RE: Authonzation Letter for a Stream Margin Review 1.and Use Application: The Bell Residence on Shady l ane, Aspen CO. Dear James: As the representative of the owners of the subject property located on the corner of Shady Lane and Red Mountain Road, 1 authorize Davis Horn Incorporatcd to submit a land use application on behalf ofthe owners, Raaring Fork LLC, Brad and Colleen Bell, and to represent the owners in the land use review process Davis Horn Inc. is located at 215 South Monarch Street Suite 104 in Aspen and can bc reached by phone at (970) 923-6587. [can be reached at (970) 922-9188. Please call ifyou have any questions. Thank you S Ct \1 l ~--tr (- PYLU- GAN FrA Xmith 1 . L. w . C~ - U 1.....-j......'1..'31'Ii..71-E-----.' .'-Tmr. --_ .1.-r n T. 1-1.-1 ,=.*i- --- ~SSLIED BY OWNER'S POLICY OF TITLE INSURANCE 1 Im~a'er41tleInsumnce @pgatilm PIDLICY NUMBER A 15-025963q ATTACHMENT- j g SUBJECT TO THE EXCLUSIONS FROM COVERAGE, THE EXCEPTIONS FROM COVERAGE CONTAINED IN SCHEDULE B AND THE CONDITIONS AND STIPULATIONS, LAWYERS TITLE INSURANGg CORPORATION, a Virginia corporation. herein called the Company, Insures, as of Date of Policy shown In Schedule A again:t losa or damage, not exceeding the Amount of Irtsurance stated In Schedule A, sustained or Incurred by the Insured by reason of Title to the estate or interest described In Schedule A being vested other than as stated therein; Any defect In or lien or encumbrance on the title; unrnamotabillty ofthe title; Lack of a right of access to and from tile land. The Company will also pay the costs, attorneys' fees and expenses incurred in defenie of the title, as insured, tut only to the extent provided In the Conditions and Supulatlons. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, LAWYERS TITLE INSURANCE CORPORATION has Caused Its corporate name and Seal to be hereunto artixed by its duly authorized omcers, the Policy to become valid when aountersigned by an authorized omcer or agent of tre Company. LAWYERS TITLE INSURANCE CORPORATION ./5257*~~ Atte AL.Dlj.Jr- {f<$â‚¬iiA} 7,'* 1925 ~#2/ By: Secretary 44 +-_ President <may EXCLUSIONS FROM COVERAGE The following miners are expressly excluded from the coverage of this policy and the Company will r,ot pay loss or damage, costs, attorneye' fees or expenses which arise by reason of: 1, (a) Any law, ordinance or governmental regulation (including but not limited to building and zorting laws, ordinarices, or regulations) restricting, regulatlng, prohibiting or relating to (D the occupancy, use, ar enjoyment of the land; (Ii) the character, dlmensions or location of any Improvement now or hereafter erected on the lanct (111) a sepamtion In ownership or a change In the dknimions or area of the land or any parcel of which the land Is or was a part; or (Iv> environmental protection. or the effect of any violation of these- laws. ordinances or governmental regulptions, except ro me extent that a nollce of the enforcement thereof or a notice of a clefect. lien or encumbrance resulting from a violation ocalleged violation affecting the land has bean recorded In the public records at Pate of Poli:y. (b) Any governmental police power not excluded by (a) above, except to the mdent that a notice of the e,xercise thereof or a notice of a defect lien or encumbrance resulting from a violation or alleged violation affectlng the land has been recortled In the public records at Date of Policy, 2. 8Ights of eminent domain unless notice of the exerolte thereof has been recorded in the public records at Oate of Policy, but not aclualng from coverage any taking which has occurred prior to Date of Policy which would be binding on #16 rights of a purchaser for vatue wIthout knowledge. 3. Defects, lions, encwmbrances, adverse claims or other matters: (a) created. sulfered, aesumed or agreed to by the Insured claimant; *) not known to the Company, not recorded in the public records at Date of Policy, but known to the Insured claimant and not disclosed In writing to the Company by the Insured claimant prlor to the date the Insured claimant became an Insured under this policy: (c) resulting In no loss or damage to the Insured daimant; (d) attaching or created subeequent to Date of Policy; or (e) resulting In loss or damage which would not have been sustalned If the insured claimant had paid value for the estate or interest Insured by this policy. 4. Any claim. which arises out of the transaction vestlng In the Insured the estate or Interest Insured by this pobcy, by reason of the operation of ~ federal bankruptcy, slate Insolver,cy. or Wmllar creditors' rights laws that Is based on: (a) the transaction creating me estate or interest Insured by this policy being deemed a fraudulent conveyarrce or fraudulent transfer or (b) the tmnsaction creating the estate or Interest insured by this pollcy being deemed a preferential transter except where the Preferentlal transfer results from the failure: (i) to timely record the instrument of transfer; or (Il) of such recomation to Impart notice to a purchaser for value or a judgment or lien creditor. NM 1 PA 10 Cover ALTA Owner'S Policy (10-17-92) Valid only 11 Schedulee A and B are attached Form 1190-74A ORIGINAL p.$0Nr inn)ULE A-OWNER'S POLICY , CASE NUMBER DATE OF POLICY AMOUNT OF INSURANCE POUCY NUMBER PCT15608L2 January 9, 2001 @ 12:22 PM $5,800,000.00 A75-0259639 1. NAME OF INSURED: ROARING FORK I LLC 2. THE ESTATE OR INTEREST IN THE LAND HEREIN AND WHICH IS COVERED BY THIS POLICY IS: IN FEE SIMPLE 3. THE ESTATE OR INTEREST REFERRED TO HEREIN IS AT DATE OF POLICY VESFED IN: ROAR1 NG FORK 1 LLC 4. THE LAND REFERRED TO IN THIS POLICY IS SITUATED IN THE COUNTY OF PITKINT STATE OF COLORADO AND IS DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: See Attached Exhibit 17\" PITKIN COUNTY TmE, INC 601 E HOPKINS AVE. ASPEN, COLORADO 81611 (970) 925-1766/ (970-925-6527 FAX THE POLICY NUMBER SHOWN ON THIS SCHEDULE MUST AGREE WITH THE PREPRINTED NUMBER CiN TME COVER SHEET. 4 . EXHIBIT "A" LEGAL DESCRIPTION The following tract of land located in the NWK SW]4 of Section 7, Township 10 South, Range 84 West of the 6th P.M. TRACT NO. 1 Beginning at Comer No, 1, a pine post, whence the West y comer to Section 7, Township 10 South, Range 04 West of the 6th P.M., bears West 562.6 feet; U.S.L.M. Ute No, 4 bears S 28*04' E 3654.4 feet; thence East 376 feet thence South 200 feet; thence N 71'34' W 396.3 feet; thence North 75 feet to place of beginning. Variation of 14Â°40' East. TRACT NO. 2 Beginning at the Southeast Comer of tract described in Deed recorded in Book 49 at Page 12, Pitkin County Clerk and Recorders Office (being also the Southeast Corner of Tract 1 above); mence South 125 feet, more or less to the North Bank of the Roarlog Fork River; thence Westerly along the North Bank of the Roaring Fork River 305 feet, more or less; thence North 150 feet, more or less. to the South line of said tract described in Book 49 at Page 12. Pitkin County Clerk and Recorder's Office; thence S 71'34' E 341.3 feet to the place of beginning. TRACT NO. 3 Beginning at a point whence the West 14 comer of Section 7, TownstÂ® 10 South, Range 84 West of the 6th P.M. bears North 200.0 feet, and West 938,6 feet, (the true point of triangular parcel of land more fully detscribed as follows); thence Southeasterly along the South right of way line of the County Road a distance of 300 feet to the intersection of said road with the North Bank of the Roaring Fork RlveG thence Northerly and Westerly 4Iong teh North Bank of the RoaMng Fork River a distance 0910.0 feet to the Southeast corner of that certain tract described in Book 49 at Page 57, Office of the Pitkin County Clerk and Recorder; thence North 125.0 feet to the point of beginning, being the same property described upon Deed recorded in Book 177 at Page 128, Pitkin County Clerk and Recordefs Office. TRACT NO. 4 Beginning at a point whence the West >4 comer of Section 7, Township 10 South, Range 84 'Nest of the 60 RM, bears North 175.06 feet and West 938.6 feet thence S 44Â°29'24" E 159.10 feet thence S 34Â°05'00" E 119.84 feet; thence S 52Â°30'00" W 52 feet more or less to the apparent mean high water line of the Roaring Fork River; thence N 32Â°06'24" W 258,90 feet; thence North 24.94 feet, more or less, to the point of beginning. (Continued) 1 .... 1 ./1 1 . ... ./ EXCE?TING F,ROM THE ABOVE [ RIBED PROPERTY THE FOLLOWING C 11BED PROPERTY: Beginning at a point whence the West y. corner of Section 7, Township 10 South, Range 84 West of the 6th P.M. bears West 802.70 feet , thence East 63.49 feet: thence 58.48 feet along a curve to the left, whose radius is 153.33 feet cl'lord beats S 33Â°33'47" E 58.13 feet, thence S 44Â°29'24" E 57.48 feet thence South 85.62 feet to the point of beginning of Tract 3 as amended; thence N 44Â°29'24" W 118.55 feet: thence 105.86 feet along a curve to the rlght, whose radius is 213.33 feet, chord bears N 30Â°16'26" W 104.77 feet to the point of beginning. ALSO EXCEPTING: Any portion of the above described property lying and being within the DARG railroad right of way. 1 ..1 1 I ./, w SCHEDULE B-OWNERS CASE NUMBER DATE OF POLICY POLIC'i NUMBER PCT15608U January 9, 2001 @ 12:22 PM A75Â·0259639 THIS POLICY DOES NOT INSURE AGAINST LOSS OR DAMAGE BY REASON OF THE FOLLOWING: 1. Rights or claims of parties in possession not shown by the public records. 2. Easements, or claims of easements, not shown by the public records. 3. Discrepancies, conflicts in boundary lines, shortage In area, encroachments, any facts which a correct survey and inspection of the premises would disclose and which are not shown by the public records. 4. Any lien, or right to a lien, for services, labor, or material heretofore or hereafter furniq hed, imposed by law and not shown by the public records. 5. Water rights. claims or title to water. 6. Taxes for the year 2001 not yet due or payable. 7. Right of the proprietor of a vein or lode to extract or remove his ore therefrom, should the same be found to penetrate or Intersect the premises hereby granted as reserved in United States Pattint recorded June 8, 1888 in Book 55 at Page 2. 8. Easement for Private Road and County Road as shown on Plat recorded in Ditch Book 2A at Page 315. 9. Easement and right of way for the Harris Ditch, as it may affect the subject property as set forth in instrument recorded January 17, 1972 in Book 260 at Page 818. 10. Easement and right of way granted to Aspen Metropolitan Sanitation District in Instrument recorded September 26, 1979 in Book 376 at Page 414. 11. Easement and right of way for an electric transmisslqn or distribution line or system, As granted to Holy Cross r Electric Association, Inc., In Instrument recorded November 8, 1979 in 8ook 378 at Page 965. 12. Easement and right of way to install, construct, repair, maintain and operate a water line and appurtenances as set forth in instrument recorded May 1, 1989 in Book 591 at Page 422 as amended by instruments recorded October 12, 1990 in Book 632 at Page 50 and December 10, 1992 in Book 697 at Page 319. 13. Any portion of the subject property lying within tile D&RG Railroad right of way. 14. Any question, dispute or adverse claim as to any loss or gain of land as a result of any change in the river bed location by other than natural causes, or alteration through accretion, reliction, erosion or avulsion of the center thread, bank, channel or flow of waters in the Roaring Fork River lying within subject land; and any question as to the location of such center thread, bed, bank, bed or channel as a legal description nlonument or marker for the purposes of describing or locating subject lands. NOTE: There are no documents In me land records of the Office of the Clerk and Recorder of Pitkin County, Colorado accurately locating past or present location(s) of the center thread, bank, bed, or channel of the above River or indicating any alterations of the same as from time to time may have occured. AND Any rights, interest or easements in favor of the riparian owners, the State of Colorado, The United States of America, or the general public, which exist. have existed, or are claimed to exist in and over the waters and present and past bed and banks of the Roaring Fork River. EXCEPTIONS NUMBERED 1,2,3 AND 4 ARE HEREBY OMITTED. n..metral=117 enton" *Ar ....LJ'.IrilicitÂ¥11411 1 '-I/.1.41Â¥1 11....-- ATTACHED TO AND MADE A PART OF LAWYERS TITLE INSURANCE CORPORATION POLICY NO. A75-0259639 PCT15608L2 The company hereby insures the insured against loss or damage which the insured shall sustain by reason of damage to existing improvements, including lawns, shrubbery or 1:rees, resulting from the exercise of any right to use the surface or subsurface of said land for the extraction or development of minerals or for any other purpose shown as a reservation or exception'in Schedule B. The total liability of the Company under said policy and any endorsements therein shall not exceed, in the aggregate. the face amount of said policy and costs which the Company is obligated under the conditions and stipulations thereof to pay. This endorsement is made a part of said policy and is subject to the schedules, conditions and stipulations therein, except as modified by the provisions hereof. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Company has caused this endorsement to be signed and sealed as of December 30, 1899 12:00 AM to be valid when countersigned by an authorized officer or agent of the Company, all in accordance with its By-Laws. ISSUED AT PITKIN COUNTY TITLE, INC, 601 E. HOPKINS AVE., ASPEN, COLORADO 81611. COUNTERSIGNED: ~fIfY k-j\1343&/4 AUTHORIZED 01'FICER OR AGENT ENDORSEMENT FORM 103.1 AITACHED TO AND MADE A PART OF LAWYERS TITLE INSURANCE CORPORATION POLICY NO. A75-0259639 PCT15608L2 The Company hereby insures against loss or damage which the Insured Shall sustain; as a result of any exercise of the right of use or maintenance of the easement referred to in paragraph ~ 9 of Schedule B or through said land. This endorsement is made a part of the policy or commitment and is subject to all the terms and provisions thereof and of any prior endorsements thereto, Except to the exter,t expressly stated, it neither modifies any of the terms and provisions of the policy or commitment and pMor endorsements or increase the face amount thereof. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Company has caused this Endorsement to be signed and sealed, to be valid when countersigned by an authorized officer or agent of the Company, all in accordance with its By-Laws. ISSUED AT PITKIN COUNTY TITLE, INC. 601 E. HOPKINS AVE., ASPEN ,COLORADO 81611 COUNTERSIGNED: AlaiN<14noill AUTHORIZED OFFICER OR AGENT th, J L CITY OF ASPEN ATTACHMENT Iq PRE-APPLICATION CONFERENCE SUMMARY PLANNER: James Lindt, 920.5104 DATE: 1 1.1-01 PROJECT: 17 Shady Lane Slrcam Margin Review, Residential Design Standard Variance for front door to be located further than 10 feet back from frontmast faede. REPRESENTA'1'IVE Glenn Horn and Alice Davis OWNF.R: TYPE OF APPLICATION: One Step - Planning and Zoning Commission DESCRIPTION: Preliminary Top of Slope has been reviewed by City Engineering. Residential Design Standard were reviewed with applicant. Preliminary design necessitates a variance from the standard that requires the front door to be within 10 feet from the frontmost wall of the structure. The property has two street frontages. The property should be designed with Shady Lane as the front yard and Red Mountain road as the side yard for purposes of setbacks and residential design standards. Only one curb cut is allowed per building site. GMQS Exemption is required by either providing an ADU or paying the cash-in-lieu fcc for the additional FAR. Land Use Code Section(s) 26.435.040 Stream Margin Review 26.520 Accessory Dwelling Units if ADU is included in design application. 26.410 Residential Design Standards 26.304 Development Review Procedures Review by: Staff for completeness, DRC for technical considerations, CD Director for recommendation on Stream Margin and design Standard Variances, P&Z for Stream Margin approval and any requested Residential Design Variances Public Hearing: Yes for Design Standard Variance. Referral Agencies: Engineering, Parks Planning Fees: Planning Deposit Minor ($1,205 for 6 hours) Referral Agency Fees: Engineering, Minor ($180) Total Deposit: $1,385 (additional hours are billed at a rate of $205/hour) To apply, submit the following information: 1. Proofofownership. 2. Signed fee agreement. 3. Applicant's name, address and telephone number in a letter signed by the applicant which states the name, address and telephone number of the representative authorized to act on behalf of the applicant, 4. Street address and legal description of the parcel on which development is proposed to occur, consisting of a current certificate from a title insurance company, or attorney licensed to practice in the State of Colorado, listing the names ofall owners ofthe property, and alt mortgages, judgments, liens, easements, contracts and agreements affecting the parcel, and demonstrating the owner's right to apply for the Development Application. 5. Total deposit for review ofthe application. 6, 15 Copies of the complete application packet and maps. 7. An 8 1/2- by 11" vicinity map locating the parcel within the City of Aspen. 8. Site improvement survey including topography and vegetation showing the current status, including all easements and vacated rights of way, ofthe parcel certified by a registered land surveyor, licensed in the state of Colorado. FN . 9. A written description ofthe proposal and an explanation in written, graphic, or model form of how the proposed development complies with the review standards relevant to the development application. Please include existing conditions as well as proposed. 10. Proposed illustrative site plan showing top-of-slope, building envelope, and proposed development with signature lines for Engineering and Com. Dev. to become a recorded document attached to P&Z resolution. 1 1. Site Section drawing showing approximate top of slope and 45 degree line from thal point showing compliance with progressive height limit. Disclaimer: The foregoing summary is advi.50ry in nature only and is not binding on the City. The summary is based on current zoning, which is subject to change in the futurÂ·c, and upon factual representations that may or may not be accurate. The summary does not create a legal or vested right. â‚¬ ATTACHMENT 20 State of Colorado ) ) SS AFFIDAVIT OF JANET RACZAK County of Pitkin ) I, JANET RACZAK, Affiant, being of lawful age and duly sworn upon my oath, do depose and state as follows: 1. OnNovember 5,2001, I visited the Aspen/Pitkin County GIS Office to obtain the records of land and property owners within 300 feet ofthe subject property for use in the public noticing process and who are to receive the Oliphant/Roaring Fork LLC/Bell land use application public notice. 2. Based on my research an updated to the most current list was provided to Davis Horn, Incorporated on behalfoftheir client for use in the public noticing process and a copy ofthat list is hereby submitted to the Pitkin County Community Development Office. 3. I made a good faith effort to obtain an accurate list ofthe names and addresses ofthe land owners within 300 feet ofthe subject parcel (see Exhibit "A"). FURTHER, AFFIÂ£IT SAYETH NOT. 01'u.- f. fil,Â£#L /47~81 ~let L. Raczak I)ate The foregoing instrument was acknowledged and signed before me on // / 7 ,2001 by Janet L. Raczak. WITNESS my hand and official seal. My commission expires: 82 ~7 ~002 ~~~091~ (SEAL) NOTARY PUBLIC fz - - ASPEN CENTER FOR ENVIRONMENTAL - ADRIANCE FRANKLIN III P ASPEN CONSOLIDATED SANITATION STUDIES ) f 55 LONE PINE RD #87 565 N MILL ST 100 PUPPY SMITH ST ASPEN, CO 81611 ASPEN, CO 81611 ASPEN, CO 81611 3ALDWIN JOHN F JR BEKLIK ROYA BELL ANTHONY R 30 BOX 2972 414 INDEPENDENCE PL PO BOX 449 A.SPEN, CO 81612-2972 ASPEN, CO 81611 ASPEN, CO 81612 BIRRFELDER BRIGITTE T BONDS MICHAEL STEPHEN & ELArNE 3IELFIELD LAURENCE H LONE PINE APTS JOHNSON 3 11 INDEPENDENCE PL 0155 LONE PINE RD A-8 310 INDEPENDENCE PL \SPEN, CO 81611 ASPEN, CO 81611 ASPEN, CO 81611 3OUGHTON WILLIAM REID BOWMAN JON R & JILL T BRADY SUSAN L 3OUGHTON JACQUELINE LEE 620 INDEPENDENCE PL PO BOX 4372 [02 INDEPENDENCE PL ASPEN, CO 81611 ASPEN, CO 81612 \SPEN, CO 81611 3RUNSWOLD KIRK W BUESCH THOMAS A CHURCH KRISTEEN 113 INDEPENDENCE PL 206 INDEPENDENCE PL 0155 LONE PINE RD UNIT D4 \SPEN, CO 81611 ASPEN, CO 81611 ASPEN, CO 81611 DALY GLENN A JITY OF ASPEN COULOMBE RICHARD DALY CAROL CENTER 30 S GALENA ST 0155 LONE PINE RD UNIT B-8 0155 LONE PINE RD C-11 RIVER BLUFF TH \SPEN, CO 81611 ASPEN, CO 81611 ASPEN, CO 81611 )E CAMPO RICHARD L & SUSAN K DETURRIS MONICA ELLIOT BLAIR S ;09 INDEPENDENCE PL PO BOX 944 0155 LONE PINE RD A-11 \SPEN, CO 81611 ASPEN, CO 81612 ASPEN, CO 81611 FRANKLIN DAVID MICHAEL & ETHERIDGE MARY KATHERINE FARSON ELIZABETH L MICHELLE ~O BOX 1462 PO BOX 10602 207 INDEPENDENCE PL \SPEN, CO 81612 ASPEN, CO 81612 ASPEN, CO 81611 GINSBERG JEROME D TRIEDBERG KAREN P 50% INT GARZOLI DIANNE L C/O LANSCO CORP 'O BOX 8747 104 INDEPENDENCE PL 575 LEXINGTON AVE STE 1600 \SPEN, CO 81612 ASPEN, CO 81611 NEW YORK, NY 10022 JINSBURG FRANCES GODWIN GAYLE A GOLDSTEIN DEBRA 'O BOX 9961 PO BOX 10776 155 LONE PINE RD APT A18 tSPEN, CO 81612 ASPEN, CO 81612 ASPEN, CO 81611-3281 Extt' 8 IT '/A " . 1 GOSHORN MARCIA L - GUFFEY JAMES R GUILTINAN JOHN F JR TRUSTEE 5Â·16 INDEPENDENCE PL PO BOX 2158 12 RUE DEAUVILLE ASPEN, CO 81611 ASPEN, CO 81612 NEWPORT BEACH, CA 92660 HAGGERTY BEATRICE M HALL JO-ANN HANLE GREGORY L & CYNDY REID 308 INDEPENDENCE CT 103 [NDEPENDENCE PL 0155 LONE PINE RD #A19 ASPEN, CO 81611 ASPEN, CO 81611 ASPEN, CO 81611 HINES GERALD D HIPP CHRISTINE A HOLMSTEDT MONIKA C/O DUGDALE MARIAN 621 INDEPENDENCE PL PO BOX 1141 2800 POST OAK BLVD ASPEN, CO 81611 ASPEN, CO 81612 HOUSTON, TX 77065-6100 INGRAM PAULINE E IRELAND MICHAEL C KASPAR ALEXANDER GARRETT 0155 LONE PINE RD A-3 225 N MILL ST #203 PO BOX 12061 ASPEN, CO 81611 ASPEN, CO 81611 ASPEN, CO 81612 KIRCH MARK A KIRSHEN VITASHKA LANGLEY ROBERT A&S DARNELL 412 INDEPENDENCE PL 0155 LONE PINE RE) A-5 PO BOX 8885 ASPEN, CO 81611 ASPEN, CO 81611 ASPEN, CO 81612 LASSER JASON M MAC DONALD SHIRLEY M & PAUL V MCCLINTON MICHELE 155 LONE PINE RD #Al 0155 LONE PINE RD A-2 618 INDEPENDENCE PL ASPEN, CO 81611-1537 ASPEN, CO 81611 ASPEN, CO 81611 NORRIS BARBARA L ODEN & CO ODEN & COMPANY PO BOX 1629 PO BOX 660 PO BOX 660 ASPEN, CO 81612 ASPEN, CO 81612 ASPEN, CO 81612 DDEN ENTERPRISES PEGOLOTTI DELLA J PARKS CAROL DDEN NANCY C/O VICKERY JACK H 200 NEWBURY ST PO BOX 660 PO BOX 12360 BOSTON, MA 02116 ASPEN, CO 81612 ASPEN, CO 81612 PERLMUTTER JAMES ROBERT PITKIN COUNTY PITT MURRAY C )155 LONE PINE RD #A-10 530 E MAIN ST STE 302 2000 TOWNCENTER STE 1350 ASPEN, CO 81611 ASPEN, CO 81611 SOUTHFIELD, MI 48075 ROARING FORK I LLC ROARING FORK I LLC RUBEY WM & RBT BERING KAREN E 2/0 BURT BOWEN BOWEN & BOWEN C/O BURT BOWEN BOWEN & BOWEN RUBEY 1/4 340 QUAIL RIDGE DR 240 QUAIL RIDGE DR 2121 SAGE RD STE 150 WESTMONT, IL 60559 WESTMONT, IL 60559 HOUSTON, TX 77056 ... I SCHULTZ RESIDENCE TRUST SHAMIE SAM SHERMAN RICHARD 3849 PASEO DEL CAN[PO 26111 W 14 MILE RD STE LL4 0155 LONE PINE RD B-3 PALOS VERDES ESTATES, CA 90274 FRANKLIN, MI 48025 ASPEN, CO 81611 STARN STANLEY JOSEPH SLADDIN MICHAEL DAVID SMITH DIANE W/ PLATEK RIVER BLUFF TOW-NHOMES C-7 205 INDEPENDENCE PL 0155 LONE PINE RD UNIT A-17 155 LONE PINE RD ASPEN, CO 816 I 1 ASPEN, CO 81611 ASPEN, CO 81611 SYNERGY PARTNERSHIP (50%) AND STEVENS TIMOTHY STRAKA VIRGINIA C ROSTAD EILEEN (50%) 0155 LONE PINE RD #A- I 2 0155 LONE PINE RD A-15 601 E HOPKINS AVE STE 103 ASPEN, CO 81611 ASPEN, CO 81611 ASPEN, CO 81611 TRISH HEATHER M UBRACH OLLIE VOORHIES THOMAS 155 LONE PINE RD #A4 PO BOX 11223 PO BOX 619 ASPEN, CO 8 I 611 ASPEN, CO 81612 ASPEN, CO 81612 WILLOUGHBY PONDS TRUST WABISZEWSKI KATY WEDUM JOHN R 110 NORTH WACKER DR PO BOX 943 101 INDEPENDENCE PL SUITE 330 ASPEN, CO 81612 ASPEN, CO 81611 CHICAGO, IL 60606 /4 ./ u. ./1 I ./ P Â· 8 ATTACHMENI_ K#.Ak JAA}t ga y # 11 I t-_1 RESIDiw~JiAl.1145251#1, CWECKLIST NOTIFICATION OF APPROVAI A- RESIDEITIAL DESIGN STANDARDS MET; The project located at ~ i~ S)~Ag 'L,Â·Â» * has been reviewed by the City planning staff and has been found to be in compliance with the "Residential Design Standards" as adopted by Ordinance 20, Series of 1999. 4,47 Planning St&&Â· B. DESIGN REVIEW APPEAL BOARD REVIEW COMPLETED: The project locuted at- hag been revievred by the Design Review Appeal Committee and has been found to be in compliance wilh the "Rt:sidential Design Standards" as adopted by Ordinance 20, 3 eries of 1999, with the exception of the standards related to which have been wived. Conditions of approval were - or were not made iy the Design Review Appeal Board. If conditions apply, the meeting minutes are attach :d. Planning Staff THE ATTACHED REDUCED SIZEDRAWINGS, INITIALIZED BY THE PLANFING STAFF MEMBER ASSIGNED TO THE CASH, REPRESENT THE PROPOSAL TRAT HAS BEEN APPROVEI) AS DESCRIBED ABOVE ANY VARIANTIONS FROMTHESS PLANS WILL REQUIRE HE-REVIEW. 44 efpr,/Vi< (14 ifi . 2,72- el-Â£4Â£14: 54.4 22*aA Hiti...14 PLANT SPECIES LIST BELL RESIDENCE STREAM MARGIN REVIEW SUBMISSION NOVEMBER 5, 2001 . 8./1 49 / L *X. A ... 4 - & 14 .. 4. V 4, / * 1 4 4 (C,~A: 4. I ke % \54-L 90.#. -I'*. 7.# .141 /1 h. 6â€¢ y X # ft... , f ly=.. . - . 1 ~' *tt: *~ - \t \ 2 6.4 13' I #49;FT'*RAl~:.4 - 35 ~ =T~ .rp-11. 2 1. 37 v.4274444%-1+Kk,'76Â· . .M..1=Unk Â¥y / 1 osi> a..31*41%427~ 7,0, , #*/4/051/../..~""/ .4. I .i T &0170/W, 344. . 1 2, 9 = ---.#74Â£%- " WF'Â· -*i,9.t'LArb 6 4 0 - -41 - 1.- -- .1 441 ,-0-771 * 1'Â·-' -'-4 /:.*44 7. 4 '* 0 4 29 * 99 5 . I. -I~~I-.I- r, 04% 0 /#ilty,41. 2 41. 43': 04Kt~'*8+JE*4L 'ENâ€¢X /'.a - 1 A ' 9 11 i tÂ»i . j: .r 21 Ntt r. ... ....1 -P....2 1401 . r.avEr 10.- ' /,11 1% 41*, 1 4 Â·1(i 7 17 " ., gf)7Â£ irt. 22;4'ziw Ya 43,19 .- L :0 11 .L e,21. I 1...AL e -4~4 j Uqt #VIÂ· 10.- 1 1 1-93 ' 1 U. , 1.14 i ~tlf 3 v ' <E,trxft:Â·Xy,TK~- -p.r 4~iwk_lb=M~iÂ¥2: aM'W Â¢2 ~ 1 j 11 1 . mr.q.Â·.BM-. x.*,I.**,ir i 47 , *&.yok' 4.121~L./ ~ J.. â€žI .4* 1 .â‚¬.664 .7,42 ---* 33*N** -Â«'.?U*py'- Â¥.V twgirie~k - 2.=.cw'* 7 94.:j:5:. '.'.h...11 .*-,1, ,-.â€¢'drat# . 238. KEQJ/Va.'1:2 I ZONE A-Bank upland restoration (above top of slope): ~ SCIENTIFIC WET- INFLORES- 4/ I NAME COMMON NAME LAND CENCE FLOWERING HEIGHT WILDLIFE LIGHT ELEVATION J.Ji...hy....9. '1.7/i6&33Â¥,Vr. - Pa STATUS COLOR, SEASON BENEFITS tti~~E~~' ~ ...7 .tr Fispv.#~1~e*ea # *71 i TYPE .~7, 4- ceâ€¢*a F -*,Se. Amelanchier Mountain FAC,U White, Spring 3-13 ft Food, Pt-Full 580040 801 ~ alnifolia Serviceberry Raceme Shelter Sun Â£ - *11 -42. /4 J 1 .4 Cornus stolonifera Red-Osier Dogwood FAC,W White, Spring- 3-10 ft Food Shade- 4,000-10,000' Cyme Summer Pt Sun . ....5.Gr.-1 | Dryopteris Colorado Male Fern 3 ft Shelter Pt Sun- b#.1#/4,7W1=f filix-mas Shade - ..Â·*~ 44F7718'O/Â£/61Â· 1 -a I h#......././&1..#wa/'*...... -Ae ...44.Ve .: 1/UT ,Â»4 9/166//.Wel 44 /4 5 ;Wit -t#u: - Physocarpus Mountain Ninebark FAC,U White, Summer 3-7 ft Food, Pt-Full 4,800-9,900' %14=#9 :331â€ž,7â€ž-,=* . 4.- PWAN=f- opulifolius Corymb Shelter Sun ...INX::Â·as,3.32 . ./.Fli. *trall' ' Picea pugens Colorado Blue Spruce FAC Foliage Spring- 30-100 ft Food, Full Sun Summer Shelter -prpl- 97 â‚¬ r - Pinus ponderosa Ponderosa Pine Ye~(Zzed, Spring 50-100 ft Shelter Full Sun 5,000-9,000' .t ly. 7.2183 li, -0 | Prunus virginiana Choke Cherry FAC,U White, Spring- 5-30 ft Food, Pt-Full 4,500-10,000' _Tgrverik - f<M,4>.19* 4 ;4. . Â¥'r..2'<"r. '34';4'1 Raceme Early Summer Shelter Sun 7514264'.6~.~tkÂ¢ e ,- 4 40 #3*1~43Â¢1.. 7/Ty"'% 2.3 .r . .7 141> 7, .. Populus Narrow-Leaf FAC,W Creamy White, Spring 25-65 ft Shelter Pt-Full 6,000-8,500' VA.- 4#friy, '28 r.... -: ~, angustifolia Cottonwood Catkin Sun r:,22-~~4219(>7.:, 14 9*4 -tz j ~ -)9: 3 Populus Quaking Aspen FAC Creamy White, Spring 25-50 ft Food, Pt Sun 5,000-10,000' tremuloides Catkin Shelter ~~=~ P.MefeSS#1*Mile# r. It, F.JI Ribes Gooseberry Green Spring- 3-4 ft Food Pt Sun Dlgl #Igq'LBN101Â¥542~-MÂ· pil lfÂ¥Nt ~P~!2 M*i' 1 Ii,72/ix// 50",sm#4Â£#9/.-41*/4:j/'Ir' W 1 '1; 1 **MVE#/Fal.ik&9/ "9 1011 Summer - . 4 er '1- 140 Rosa woodsii Woods Rose FAC Pink, Spring- 2-7 ft Poor, Food Pt-Full Sun 3,500-10,500' Cyme Summer ~1 Salix Drummond's Willow FAC,W Brown/Black, Spring 7-20 ft Food Full Sun 6,000-11,000' drummondiana Catkin 4 :' â‚¬ teÂ·t LE= i TJ 215 *4 4Â» i: *k'c ~ *E ' : 4~i' 1, ~,t 4 , 1- 74.i *ift*22.J. ~Â·lati Symphoricarpos albus Snowberry FAC,U White/Pink, Summer 2-5 ft Food Shade- 5,500-7,500' b? bilifu-1 f 1- %*F- Flower Full Sun 41 -C , *â€¢,~~*fi~ '.0.P, Imapt .1 6 - * b 11 AA: Al . idâ€¢UP:* .~ 77 4 Â» :*910*k < & c. Si . i ./.Alm Wetland Status: 1/4 j:'0~- 7,1 3 ~Ary OBL = Obligate, FAC = Facultative, W = Wetland, U = Upland - ~ 1,4 ;-* /2, :. ZONE D - Bank wetland restoration (below top of slope): .4.43 -26/61+3 1.-14**20!f L.,e SCIENTIFIC WET- INFLORES- NAME COMMON NAME LAND CENCE FLOWERING HEIGHT WILDLIFE LIGHT ELEVATION 15*Â¥Â¥'+%S'"4*b'4/ STATUS COLOR, SEASON BENEFITS . #At TYPE 4,64 *trgi. K f qÂ¢rs 4 C i 4~44& .UF#t'* Alnus tenuifolia Thin-leafAIder FAC,W Red/Brown, Summer to 30 ft Food, Pt-Full 5,000-10,000' - -.-2 .--:4,24â€¢ 3,1 4%.9 9 -/:9//4. Catkin Shelter Sun .... Antennaria alpinum Rosey Pussytoes FAC Pink, Early Summer 3 in-1 ft None Full Sun 4,000-8,000' / /4. Foliage I 1/,dri Chi.F/#..- :19,1 . 4--P--4*ir.1 * r< ' Cornus stolonifera Red-Osier Dogwood FAC,W White, Spring- 3-10 ft Food Pt Sun- 4,000-10,000' Cyme Summer Shade Spring- Paa-*0 1 Iris missouriensis Rocky Mountain Iris OBL Blue, Summer 0.5-1.7 ft None Full Sun 3,500-10,000' .,2,/ Raceme Best from bulbs â€¢ Â¥-â€¢nÂ·111 u~-- I Juncus articus Baltic Rush FAC,W Brown/Black, n/a 3-4 ft Food, Full Sun 3,500-11,000' 1Ail,flit[MY/1 , - I h 4....4. U. Panicle Shelter 11-jep/1/Â£7 w *>06 114.Â·1\'6#$~â€¢â€¢â€¢W-' . 4 11, 4.-.jfRE Â¢4; IL,4>D>4 122/ liVII:â€¢A-'imal....m Juncus confusus Colorado Rush FAC,W Light Brown, n/a 3 in-1.7 ft Limited Food, Full Sun 5,000-11,500' $ "M'â€¢ f.\1 ./.i, 1. /60. 9 4.0. I. > Panicle Shelter -In'Kil/96/4 . 7.. ..YE - - I'.4 ..4 , 1 - .--,1.k.*, ./* '*<. Ar.*'*. Â¥ ..stris *F':3...... Â£ ' -A&19*441:93 k. 1,Â· . Lonicera Twinberry FAC,U Pink/White, Late Spring 3-5 ft Sheker Shade- 7,000-11,500' -81'.1~4>70,Â·-4 'ip;. '~Â· Â·--Bdijtvy &*c: involucrata Honeysuckle Raceme Pt Sun . , .:3/'T.. i :2 0'**' ~-Pt-J.~.64.. /+ -~... Ribes aureum Golden Currant FAC,W Summer 3-8 ft Food Pt Sun 4,000-8,000' " 4.4 Yellow, Raceme ' .4. + Rosa woodsii Woods Rose FAC Pink, 1.5-7 ft Poor, Food Pt-Full Sun 3,500-10,500' Spring- Cyme Summer ... --3- &.. ....ria- Populus angustifolia Narrow-Leaf FAC Creamy White, Spring 25-65 ft Shelter Pt-Full Sun 5,000-8,500' L -=2= 9.71%/7 Cottonwood Catkin 4*,~R Wetland Status: OBL = Obligate, FAC = Facultative, W = Wetland, U = Upland I ZONE E - Bank restoration at water's edge: 3*tr ./ tr.â€¢p:., F SCIENTIFIC WET- INFLORES- w...* 00 1 NAME COMMON NAME LAND CENCE FLOWERING HEIGHT WILDLIFE LIGHT ELEVATION STATUS COLOR, SEASON BENEFITS :k inal:.2,40/4 1 TYPE ..0:*4~.2=>R * ,_- . - * A"18Â».9. 4119â€¢.' 1* I 'lli Betula glandulosa Bog Birch OBL Creamy White, Late Summer 1-4 ft Food, Pt-Full 7,500-11,400' Catkin Shelter Sun 6 R V-71', ''-'0'-9 I fl |FO IL C 'L /4 i u" Carex aquatilis Water Sedge OBL Green/Black, n/a 0.5-3 ft Food Full Sun 6,000-11,500' 1 ~ l lit. -4/4'/d - -1 â€¢ .1 4 94'1.- D' f *11011 Spike A 1 JAil lm~* 1 ' >'14- ' 4 9, - 7 F lâ€¢ RE I gglizE Light Brown, n/a 1-4 ft Food Full Sun 6,500-11,000' 1/'? 0 Carex utriculata Beaked Sedge OBL Sp,ke F :4071* G 1,19 V /1 , A /1 Rl 1 - Â¥1 *,1 1 4 .2 1 m:1 i 41 1 *Â¥,11 1 Dechampsia Tufted Hairgrass OBL Yellow/ Cool Seasons 2-3 ft Food Pt-Full 7,000-14,000' al.3 I'll li ;1 1/60 cespitosa Brown, Sun < 6 6114 #~ */ti~-*l~ATI Particle ~ Equisetum hyemale Common Scouring Rush FAC,W Spring 2-3 ft None Shade- 5,000-8,500' n/a Full Sun Blue, Pt Sun 5,500-13,000' Mertensia ciliata Streamside Alpine OBL, Summer- to 3 ft Food 1 Bluebells FAC,W Panicle Early Fall 1 Salix monticola Rocky Mountain Willow OBL Creamy White, Spring 5-13 ft Food Full Sun 5,700-11,500' Catkin 1 ' Scirpus acutus 1 (Schoenoplectus Hardstem Bulrush OBL Brown, n/a 3-10 ft Food Full Sun 3,500-8,500' 4.7 ~1Â»4 0-7-/6.imiltip ;63 Lau~~331 Umbel 1912>,~i :lwit %,p . W.---.. -/--- -4 acutus) Scirpus pungens Red/Brown, n/a 1-4 ft Poor Food Full Sun 3,500-8,500' -rkib- v 1Â£ Ardan f.,Ii.--r--b,~w,., ~ (Schoenoplectus Common Threesquare OBL Compact Panicle . 77.. 1. / V. 1 pugens) t. t , 11 fyi'.1- le.Uft# 4-4/Ark | Wetland Status: OBL = Obligate, FAC = Facultative, W = Wetland, U = Upland I ZONE B - Ornamental Native Plants: , SCIENTIFIC WET- INFLORES- .,4.4.11 '..t,Â·.,-1 'fill. l.1 r. 1,4 11 IiÂ·,jt.925*0~* Â·"~<* 1~1. 10,~t;. ~ I NAME COMMON NAME STATVS g= FL~:lwgi G HEIGHT Wkil;lU LIGHT ELEVATION ihililizill"", I .96*t*4%1441 '44 f 11.~t.6 .0,t, 9~eit</3 4.12Â·11'71*V:P~4.Wil/g 1 TYPE 413Â· ~<Rti 6,3*74 .1Â¥;3 2Mm~ I. Acer glabrum Rocky Mountain Maple FAC Yellow/Green, Summer 5-25 ft Shelter Pt Sun- 5,000-10,soo, ~ F~ - ill/LaIl~1 1 73.91 W I 'F r Cyme Shade A A '4.iT .1/ Aquilegia coerulea Colorado Columbine FAC,W Blue/White, Summer 1-3 ft None Pt Sun 7,000-12,500' ~ + 1 Raceme . 0. 1~3- ",0 --4 I *48 8 1,719 Asperula odorata Sweet Woodruff White, Early Summer 0.5-lft Food Pt Sun- 4,000-8,500' ~ (Galium odoratum) Flower Shade 1 Geranium Sticky Geranium FAC,U Pink/Lavender Summer- 1-4 ft Food Pt Sun 5,300-9,400' / -ro 4â€¢'. 411,1,-*CMB , 4 7 J viscosisimun Cyme Fall 1 934 309Â»43 Lupinus argentus Silky Lupine Blue/White, Summer to 3 ft None Full Sun 5,000-11,000' i | -4*akf-- 0-7.71 Â·2 *flf 4,2-4.99 4-:3 ./ .1...: t<.1,//0:FIR.0. ,/4.1 9/1/k1Qi 74~34Â· ' i Raceme f...1 1 | Mahonia repens Oregon Grape Holly Yellow, Spring- 0.5-1.5 ft Food Pt-Full 5,500-10,000' .--=... .--114*4IBIIE 1 94 Â·Â· c ,Â·t 4. 16*4%9 .Â·4 Cht ./ Â· h. 1- . 1 Raceme Summer Sun 426: ZEÂ· 4 '0 -I ... 7 ty ..â€¢:Ill-/Ig.... d!.*% 1 Â· e.* tr,Â·.* Â» - | Pachystima Mountain Lover Foliage/Shrub 2-4 ft Pt-Full 2% , - ..$ L ./. /.:1.44 4 1/9 I i : ., ...:. \KÂ· myrsinites Sum 1 Physocarpus Mountain Ninebark FAC,U White, Summer 3-7 ft Food, Shelter Pt-Full 4,800-9,900' C 4 opulifolius Corymb Sun + L ~ Polemonium caeruleum Jacob's Ladder FAC Powder Blue, Early Summer 1-3 ft None Pt Sun 6,000-10,000' -1 Xek, 0, + . 4 Cyme 6/4 1 | Yellow, Summer 2-4 ft Full Sun 7,000-10,000' Potentilla fruticosa Shrubby 1 Cinquefoil Flower r 741=- , | Rubus parviflorus Thimbleberry FAC White, Summer 3-7 ft Food Pt Sun 7,000-10,000' .. 24% Cyme Spiraea Spring Full Sun 4,000-7,500' 1 Vanhoutte Spirea OBL White, 7-10 ft Food ., ..2744â€žG;* . i"f 5%'I.",4/FL 4- k vanhouttei 01*#m995:710** 9 Flower (non-native) ,#-'ll 'illi##i \ F Wetland Status: Vâ‚¬'.D +1/7% ~6: r:'4#O,LaRRA OBL = Obligate, FAC = Facultative, W = Wetland, U = Upland I ZONE C - Wildflower seed mix to be used in upland stream margin: SCIENTIFIC WET- INFLORES- NAME COMMON NAME LAND CENCE FLOWERING HEIGHT WILDLIFE LIGHT ELEVATION STATUS COLOR, SEASON BENEFITS TYPE Agropyron smithii Western Wheatgrass Blue/Green, Cool Seasons 1-1.5 ft Food Ful Sun Foliage/Spike Agropyron Slender Wheatgrass Green, Cool Seasons 1.5-3 ft Food 41 + 44%. : Mt?g trachycaulum Foliage i 954'LU/Â©8 Artemisia Prairie Sage Silver, Late Summer 2-4 ft Food Full Sun 3,000-11,000' 1,1~Ja. ludoviciana Flower/Foliage . .9,4.1 *G Bouteloua gracilis Blue Grama Tan, Warm Seasons 3 in-1.5 ft Food Full Sun 3,000-8,500' * i.... 1 Foliage , 0% 4 VIAY /4 12 * '.E & -i''C 1,6 0. :.4 # ~ 297 Chrysopsis Hairy Golden Aster Summer 0.5-1 ft Pt-Full 144# ' 11- Yellow, villosa Flower Sun -r" ant *. Vt - Cleome serrulata Rocky Mountain Pink, Mid-Late 2-5 ft Bee Plant Flower Summer Sun Elymus cinereus Basin Wild Rye OBL Light Green, Cool Seasons 3-5 ft Food Full Sun Foliage eÂ¥ 11#~~alle:li11352*Aug.< .'4.2 Erigeron speciosus Aspen Daisy OBL Blue/Lavender, Summer 1.5-2 ft Pt-Full *4211 ////////9/, 9~ 4 .24 3% ' ///3#//L/2////4-5 Flower Sun 1 Fi.,6.Â£'.... ,r Erigonum Sulfur Flowered Yellow/Orange, Summer- 0.5-1 ft Poor Pt-Full 5,000-10,500' - umbellatum Buckwheat Umbel Fall Sun j.;,4/44-,4,~4:11 .+U > Q 14 A Festuca thurberi Thurber's Fescue Light Brown, Cool Seasons 1-3 ft Food Shade- 6,500-12,000' Panicle Full Sun rrÂ·L:'4~Â·urÂ· /till,4126 f . Gaillardia aristata Perennial OBL Yellow/Red, Summer- 1-1.5 ft None Full Sun Below 7,000' Fr'G~k* 46 ./ 26 Blanketflower Flower Fall - .,4 Ar. -6.-07-j~ Flf#/440 Geranium Sticky FAC,U Pink/Lavender, Summer- 1-4 ft Food Pt Sun 5,300-9,400' 1$444% S#/fo 'Cjpfi#*35/. Â£1 + ' A -1. t Â· 1- viscosissimum Geranium Cyme Fall -1//4,#* 1 ~1; / veÂ«. . 2 1, 1 94 1. I ST.y.4 Ckly .iilt...J.= 7- Wetland Status: OBL = Obligate, FAC = Facultative, W = Wetland, U = Upland ../7 + 1 I ZONE C - Wildnower seed mix to be used in upland stream margin: cont. - -2 -224 f:grjeil:"31:44*t>'44:91*). LJ I Ill I SCIENTIFIC WET- INFLORES- ~ -4.9*4,9r ~4#*4%)OW i NAME COMMON NAME LAND CENCE FLOWERING HEIGHT WILDLIFE LIGHT ELEVATION . 7 Â·,i.2 Â·p 319*47 R#litt + ;k,33;15% Â· STATUS COLOR, SEASON BENEFITS .ht; Sit,Ine..â€ž./ s .. F., tam/722*rÂ·ff.7 *#14.AÂ·114Â¢%924 i TYPE 0 *?4 b.)~ 42< , . 2 1-k -1:~ .a. r'Q'4#'Ai,U+~-0 1# :04*71 , /0..3:*f~:+.Wa:j:(Up#*PH)*9%44 . 427 *ts*'.5,43Â¢* 95*Â»tÂ· | Blue Flax Blue, Early Summer 1-2 ft None Full Sun 4,500-9,500' . ke .11;(74%44:*Arl 143$1Â¥ : ~â€ž g eW â€¢~44~$|ic '~. ~#.~M,9 4 'L.,4 Linum perenne rE S . 0 . u # i - ciâ€¢3Â·)24~''i-~ 4 *,6 '3,30; 4 6*ircd. ~ Flower eb:r:â€ž 1,.,4 ., = / , '. 9.,": . , ....84.-/1 49â€¢70 v. lewisii k â€¢ 4 , 1,4,2 1:Ji': m 41*J,994*40 I :. I . Â· 99.-1 " 1 b . ' '~ :9Â·'diI ;~ A .' . r Z 'A. 5"4 4:'2'2. Silky Lupine OBL Blue/White, Summer to 3 ft None Full Sun 5,000-11,000' .* I , 42.2='&7...LIT-I=-* : 4 214 'Â©' ff ' 'XÂ¢ 4.Nts.,4 j , 1~Â«, 4 1 Lupinus argenteus .: 6. *Â©.4- 4.- â€¢14f t f .. 4 . ' >11[~~1< I â‚¬4<t i.*y? fi.4Â·~ Raceme An/vt'ke ' 0- '* 411 21.4 43 1. C - -Il- r-Â·> ~ 1 1 4.1 1-at i. ..1 .4. t.? i.4.P Atle 4,16 4.. ~ Oryzopsis hymenoides Indian Rice Grass Green, Cool Seasons 1-2 ft Food Full Sun 2,000-9,000' b. .. 7 /' /6 / 4: 7 t LittÂ» ./. 1 4 r , Foliage ~ViIÂ· p ,.. . 1 Showy Locoweed Pink, Early Summer 0.5-1 ft Oxytropis lambertii ,-1.Arl-.M I Flower | Rocky Mountain OBL Blue/Purple, Early Summer to 3 ft Food Pt-Full 6,000-11,000' ,(**9, Jâ€žWil .li,% 27 Penstemon strictus Penstemon Cyme Sun pe- , 9 - 0 1 Sandberg's Bluegrass Medium Green, Cool Seasons 1-1.5 ft Food Full Sun 2,000-4,000' Poa secunda 20*i~ Foliage *----= - 1 4 1 1 .liVY/Wl./.1.9,Fil Showy Goldeneye Yellow, Late Summer 1.5-3 ft Pt-Full : ~ Viguiera multiflora ... , 1 =2- //Ill. II.*jlllhill ....'-I.-i- 3 Flower Sun ~ ZONE F - Seed mix to be used in bank wetland areas: D, P. 4.2 ' .~6.4 L. 1 42 /1 SCIENTIFIC WET- INFLORES- FLOWERING HEIGHT WILDLIFE LIGHT ELEVATION i 6.: . l. . NAME COMMON NAME LAND CENCE SEASON BENEFITS STATUS COLOR, TYPE ' i. I r. I r#..4 Agrostis scabra Ticklegrass OBL Foliage Cool Seasons 1-1.5 ft Food Pt-Full 1 Sun .Â» Â¥ 4 P f | Beckmannia Beckmann's Sloughgrass Foliage Annual Cool 1.5-3 ft 0 % ~ syzigachne Seasons U. ..4. Brom us ciliatus Fringed Bromegrass Panicle Cool Seasons 2-4 ft 1,3.5 .8 . Calamagrostis Blue Joint Reed Grass OBL Green/Purple, Cool Seasons 3-5 ft Food Pt Sun 5,000-11,000' I canadensis FAC,W Foliage/Panicle ~ Wetland Status: OBL = Obligate, FAC = Facultative, W = Wetland, U = Upland .. ~17Â·44, A.... f 1 1.. ZONE F - Seed mix to be used in bank wetland areas: cont. SCIENTIFIC WET- INFLORES- 1 NAME COMMON NAME LAND CENCE FLOWERING HEIGHT WILDLIFE LIGHT ELEVATION ...,4 STATUS COLOR, SEASON BENEFITS TYPE 1 1... wnÂ¥#Y | Nebraska Sedge OBL Brown, Cool Seasons 1-4 ft Food Full Sun A _. 06/WQAâ€¢ 1 ' . J /hi.12/2 ..1.-4 - Carex nebrascencis ' Foliage/Spike <62914/Como:U .AG 1 Dechampsia Tufted Hairgrass OBL Yellow/ Cool Seasons 2-3 ft Food Pt-Full 7,000-14,000' 3-.51*/h-AR.<hi,> Brown, Sun '._>7'.1 /ve -* cespitosa '.44*:4~/7 Panicle 424" 41...24//, p 0 ~ Eleocharis palustris Creeping Spikerush OBL Brown, Cool Seasons 3 in-2 ft Poor Food Full Sun 3,400-10,700' :/.972(4*354* Foliage/Spikelet ' barÂ»Â¥' Elymus canadensis Canada Wild Rye OBL Red/Brown, Cool Seasons 3-4 ft Food Full Sun Foliage f ?hu-14 V 1-r; 1431.j. tr I 1, liF A Hordeum Meadow Barley Foliage Cool Seasons 1.5-2 ft brachyantherum 1-11.4 g Spring- 0.5-1.5ft None Full Sun 3,500-10,000' I Iris missouriensis Rocky Mountain Iris OBL Blue, Summer Raceme . r. 1 /1/".f L :,A~ b 2 j Best from bulbs ~ Juncus ensifolius Dagger Leaf Rush FAC,W Bunch Rush 1-1.5 ft Food Pt-Full Sun Juncus longistylis Meadow Longstyle FAC,W Purple/Brown, Cool Seasons 0.5-2 ft Food Pt-Full 4,500-10,000' 1 Rush Panicle Sun | Oenothera villosa Prairie Primrose FAC Yellow, Summer 1.5-3 ft Flower 1 Poa ampla Big Bluegrass OBL Cool Seasons 1-2 ft Food Pt-Full Sun 1 Ed.. Poa palustris Fowl Bluegrass FAC,W Light Brown, Cool Seasons 1-2 ft Food Pt-Full 4,500-10,000' 14 k. S.,.1 Panicle Sun 1 64 44 1 71/1 ... 9 Scripus microcarpus Small Flowered OBL Purple/Brown, Cool Seasons 2-5 ft Shelter Full Sun 4,500-8,000' 4.Ili2miliali : 1 Bulrush Cyme F .P- | Sidalcea neomexicana New Mexican Pink, Early-Mid 2-3 ft Full Sun .At.'I.'llit d.s Checkermallow Flower Summer r Wetland Status: ~ OBL = Obligate, FAC = Facultative, W = Wetland, U = Upland 0 1. @ 1 w 1 f 1-1 1 .. DESIGNWORKSHOP Landscape Architecture . Land Planning j ' Urban Design . Tourism Planning Albuquerque â€¢ Aspen â€¢ Denver â€¢ Jackson ' Sao Paulo â€¢ Santa Fe â€¢ Tempe â€¢ Lake Tahoe â€¢ rail 120 East Main Street e Aspen, Colorado 81611 (970)-925-8354 \\\ Facsimile (970) 920-1387 1 - iii WW W.D ESIGNWORKSHO P.C OM 1 1 6 1\ 1 3 Â£ '~TRAIL 9FT WIDE \ \\ - - 2 - - _ - * -7 ;/ P.O.B.TRACT NO .1 40,l3 i/\ 1 13 i ~~--7 1 1 /OLD STONE ~/ FOUNDATION \ i 4 ,-h ' At . 0 1.- 1 0 -4 < Â·Â·~ Â·~~~ 1 5 11 CL~ X \ 3 1 006 1 \ 1 2 1 i Sesse,friti:Z'~2/- --7 1\ N j. j 94\ \ I \ 0, 044\ \\1 \ I -Ve I \ *.4 \ 4 44 1 01 Â© / / 7 1 \ 1 J / 1 *,St.,3~ \\ . ~2 e) - TRANSF~RMER ~ ~'â€¢,L~ -~// ~ 9 1 -ESfyfNT /- 0 7840 9 -rL- 1 \ \ 5 \ PAVEMENT \ \ \ '1 ~0001 \/ I 0 C \. 4 / h \\ \ -- .4 /1 \ Oz EDGE OF RIPARIAN ~3 9.'.f-,1 -/ 7 //---)1 N . \ON \ 1,1. VEGETATION *-\ \ $ 3- \ ..*.--.4~ 3 < \ . il- - I.K m-- Il- p-- -I+ 1 \ r \ -- U \ 1 -- BOX, 1 - -<* L- 1% 9 Z ANG X \ 1 1 ' 1, ir â‚¬25<4*:4. ~ Â·Â·' ' 1.11 1 k-/. 1 ~7850 - C ; 1 2 .0 I / Â»41 1 L --- \ t L- 1% t - C.2 f, *3. \ - \-- 11 1 1 1 1 Z i 1'1 i 1 I 1 -% - EX. HOUSE ~ 4 f / \ ' ripÂ· /3 1 , 1 7 4 It 1 \ zi 1 ~jl J - . j 4 ~* I c--1Â£ z. 1 \\ \ /7/ 1 16 4<-7.\ 1/ : 7 \ : 2 ///---M ...\ 6 \ f Â«\0 <C 3 4 . 31\ i \ 1 \ C -- 1 1 1 1 \-- , 1 \ 10 - 111 1 \ 11 L._ _--- J 1~ h.\ " j ---12 \ 1 2 81 , 1- /=_-1 -\ AL M. AP h Â«Â« t \\\1' , 4 E U 4113â‚¬1 -1/ 1 40 /*- 07 <~~-Â·-Â·JY# .1 * A A 40 Al K 1 1 + \ 1 // - j X - .>i 1 /7 %4 1 1 ' 1 4..- .*fe,- IC I I \ 9 836 -- , 1 TOP OF S PE / 41 <4\ 1 0\ \ \.4 \4 /~ // %\ % 0,1 Â© 1.14\ 2\ 9/ :t, ,...~ 15/, 7. HARms 1 - 0% ./. .j \ \ 1 1 i 4-1 \\\ \ 1 461 \4 e 1\ i \ ., 63-7-- <be t. 01 1/ -- \ 9 \1\ ..*. .+ , ..r- --- g -, , / - 0 0 11 ..r, 9:X \14 \----- 2 c /1- . h \ A 1 1 \ r ROARING FORK RIVER -tr-ER 4124-N~#~ ~~~ A v 4 .7 - 2 101 0 , . .../1 //,--4....h * ~ / \;~-- EDGE ORIPARIAN mo A00 l / Â°-l VEGETA)ON ATTACHMENT 2 0 \--\ .0 6 im\ \N#- 0 9 1 \ ge \44 1 \ \ 0- \ . 41 700' -1 1 1 1% / /4 1 00 \ lee/ \ 44141 \\ 6 1 1 \I \\ Nes!/ 7 700 1 14* 1 1 4 7 -- 1 \ 61\ ## 00 1 02; \ ~ BIKE PATH -1 f Â«44 n \\ \CONC CURB ~ NORTH O 10 20 40 \ m EL I 1 1 GA~ ~~-~ ~ ~ ISSUE DATE: November 5,2001 DITCH/RIVE \ REVISIONS 1 14\///// # DATE DESCRIPTION Xiii\\11 \ \\ 1 - ROARING FORK RIVER \\\> 1 \11\\\\\ \\\ ~lf~uLV , \\ \ \ 1 A I. 4 1 - 4 \\\\\ \ \ d b;*A,1 - 01'11;01\\11, \~ DRAWN: REVIEWED: c, Stream Margin Review NOTES: - 1) TOPOGRAPHY PREPARED BY ASPEN PROJECT NUMBER: 2748 ~ SURVEY ENGINEERS. TOP OF SLOPE IS BASED UPON DRAWINGS SUBMITTED TO AND APPROVED BY RICHARD GOULDING, Existing CITY OF ASPEN PROJECT ENGINEER ON Conditions 0 0 / 1, \ 1 1 \ 0 1 1 - \%14, \ - /\\\ 9 3/16/01. 2) EDGE OR RIPARIAN VEGETATION SHEET NUMBER DELINEATED BY ANDREW ANTIPAS. SEE 2 REPORT INCLUDED IN THE LANDUSE Ll-1 58 APPLICATION. - Â©COPYRIGHIDESIGNWORKSHOP. INC. - ~AA-ON'E)'ki 9 'Ct 00Â¥80103 3dSV 3NV1 ADVHS TS_A-L\Bell Residence\D. CAD\DW-BELL-Sheet-Stream Margin Review.dwg 001 - 9:57am * 1 . CURVE DELTA ANGLE RADIUS ARC CHORD CHORD BEARING h~&4 . 01/ ir . Cl 28Â°25'51' 213.33' 105.86 104.77' S 30Â°16'26'E C 2 21'51'14- 153.33 58.48' 58.13 N 33Â°33'47-W LEGEND AND NOTES 1' -30' 7 3JJÂ· ~ ~ RED MOUNTAIN FOUND OR SET SURVEY MONUMENT AS DESCRIBED 50- 50 - P.O.B.TRACT NO . 1 0 30 60 P.O.B. RED MOUNTAIN ROAD R.O.W. .. a 2 FOOT CONTOURS ~:7 SURVEY CONTROL POINT 0 HUNTER CREEK WEST 562.6 EAST 376 20151 MONUMENTS 112 AND 111 N 05Â°43'01 W (GRID BEARING) BEARING ARE GEODETIC BASED ON CITY/COUNTY G.P.S. I - 5947 ~2376 63,49 7 i C <12,1 -- (144,\, \ ~\ 4~- 3,663 S.F. ./ WEST 1/4 CORNER SECTION 7, ~ V AL[) STON~ ~~~~ ~ ~ TOWNSH \P 10 SOUTH j 'RANGE ~ ~ / f<~ ~ ~ 84 WEST OF THE 6+H P.M. TRACT NO L / 111 11 0 0 MANHOLE O UTILITY BOX 1954 B.L.M. BRASS CAP ~ 1 \\ / ///7// / j ,~ FO'yrIO-1 4111!l/,0'rl 6 c.. ic i Frt. '0000' 0 UTILITY POLE \ 2% ~WERAND/~C~10 1 / -,A ~/ *.0 //Em ~ 2\ ~Io :~ EASEMENT BK. 37#,/RA ~414 ~ \ ~ 7830 /)NA> i 43- / /:F,V// ill' ./.U \ AND~SK. 378 , td. 9W ~ BRASS CAP t 1 // / .4- X:P < li %\ CO 4\ 2 TIE FOR HARRIS DITCH IS DOES NOT FIT -A\\\/ /)11 99 // \<40 / l i \\4\ / Xiii X '14 + TITLE INFORMATION PROVIDED BY: //// , Ati '1 ok d~ ' \NA.\ \ \~0*1 f \ * TRANSFORMER EASEMENT DR E *. 378/ PG. 965 / to\\7> PITKIN COUNTY TITLE, INC, SET-* /- \ .-I CASE NO. PCT 15608L V. + / N \74,ka' DATED: OCTOBER 6, 2000 1 L -=Ent'45 4.07%93- '034 , ON 36.39 /L _ 1 . 4. I L---%// CALLS IN [ 1 BOOK 49 AT PAGE 21 1 8 91Â£ cot re 0 ) 78 ---- 1% %/ M~3 ~,~~ /43 SET 100 YEAR FLOOD PLAIN AND FLOODWAY DIGITIZED 00 1 056. Z 4 .0 0 CITY OF ASPEN DEPARTMENT OF ENGINEERING MAP 9. \\\ / \1&42 \73 \121 9 PAVEMENT PARKING L LOCATIONS NEED TO ~E FIELD VERFIED BEFORE CONSTRUCTION ff: TREE 6- OR GREATER LOT IS COVERED WITH TREES NOT ALL TREES LOCATED -------.----- TOP OF SLOPE -0 iNATERL 0 2 - 31 ///i i lf) N _ ~LY ~ UTILITtES o OV 2 9 . I. 8 - 1.2 / f <6 01 .0 5,% ar In 0 /850 c 49 r 2 Â¥ it-9 1 -17717- V. O !Mt \ HOUSE 51 1 -4 \ P.O.B.TRACT NO. 4 1 0.1 \ 100 YEAR FLOOD PLAIN - -- \ FLOOR 7850.1 ~ ~T~ ~~ ~ 24,0 / CERTIFICATION Z 6 e T "NIA r - O , /07 ~ THE UNDERS IGNED STATES THAT THE PROPERTY DESCRIBED HEREON WAS . 9-/ 2 >S F . OVERHANG 6 3/ \\\ Ab AJECVB/494-0/ki o._a.L.--1 1 9/4/ # 1 F I ELD SURVEYED DUR I NG M UL.r- 1-4 Zgul AND IS ACCURATE 1~ 3 r m L =-li EASEMENTS OR RIGHTS OF WAY IN FIELD EVIDENCE OR KNOWN TO ME .i Hcm? \ le >/1<9 C DI SCREPANC I ES OF RECORD, BOUNDARY L I ~E CONFLICTS / ENCROACHMENTS, BASED ON THE FIELD EVIDENCE AS SHOWN AND ~HAT THERE ARE NO m ALUM. 1 CAP,;10( 44~ EXCEPT AS HEREON SHOWN. UNDERGROUND UTILITIES WITH NO ABOVEdiROUND 1 ./ / 3 :/.7<- e APPURTENANCES, AND DOCUMENTS OF RECORD NOT SUPPLIED TO THE Q ~ ~ P.O.8. TRACT NO f AND/1 1 ~ '4~ 40 1 -% 1% WITH THE SEAL *F OR BELOW. SURVEYOR ARE EXC@~'?REDIR/#UN S SURVEY I S VO I D UNLESS WET STAMPED 9% 4% e.0/0,1 :6>% t. - N :k / / DATED. ..3 tr#~9323 4. 102Â·: 45& 6 - 1 U . ,; 4 0 <, 1.- 140 04,0,90 59*,11, - C ..Uvil.. I 2 ~ L FLOODWAY 4>14/ 2 /--- 9 i .O <1Ja)Â¥v*,-11. J ,Â©iÂ·<pa JOHN/Pll HOEM' pla#3750*&3 1 h..44 \. 0 >*4_44-- 1 - A-\.. 1, .rp U *L'....1. :. . ..,the 10 -4 i 00 h \ Â»74 666 TOP OF\1 - ~ TOP OF .:-\%. vin> 14 ME~~ HIGH 7~ 4 64441, 2%.1 *4721 4% -* --*~-~~< 03 t-*- O SLOPE N--r> - -tiies-Unil L , CO 9.-- c 42.4 LAti 42 AWACINENT- 3 -C' 0 :CA ,3, m . '67*mnultuWSÂ¢* 50 49 61_OPE ~ '~~---0~ 1 j 0 + â‚¬ 04 Â° 40 5, \\ ~/1 \ 'Â°Q E 14 1 -Â£ 44<Ne -k.+21235 5\4 \\ 1 -- 1 < 'RACh Na 4 0 \3 42 -7/ 4 \// -\\ 1% 0\-1,>--DO \ BUTTERM I LK 1 1 .. 0<x - SliIN..t )Â«PR>~TOI~ LJ-l-i~--- 5 Â©\ 46 4Â« STREAM MARSIN REVIEW SURVEY ~ .L 17,%-- -- __.~ 4 SET OF THE FOLLOWING TRACTS OF LAND LOCATED IN SECTION 7, TOWNSHIP 10 SOUTH, RANGE 84 WEST OF THE 6th PRINCIPAL MERIDIAN DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: e \ - Q.Â» 2~---Ear-17Â·2 90.7.\ 9\ i - ./ \ 7/1/24*\/76, /\\ TRACT NO 1 ' jr- \\\ 6 + 9 BEGINNING AT CORNER NO. 1, A PINE POST WHENCE THE WEST 1/4 CORNER TO SECTION 7, TOWNSHIP 10 SOUTH; RANGE 84 WEST OF THE 6th P.M., BEARS WEST 562.6 FEET: U.S.L.M. \\\\\\\\ 1 BEARS S 28Â°04'E 3654.4 FEET: UTE NO. 4 THENCE EAST 376 FEET: 1 / //63// / / 6/ 1 THENCE NORTH 75 FEET, TO THE PLACE OF BEGINNING. VARIATION OF 14Â°40'E. THENCE N 71Â°34'W 395.3 FEET: ' 9 \ \\\\ \ THENCE SOUTH 200 FEET: \ Â»,Nk 9 1% 1 21'~ 1 1\Ii % . \ PAVED BIKE PATH TRACT NO. 2 57(0.112 -7 39 \\ \\\\\\ \ \ C\\ BEGINNING THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF A TRACT DESCRIBED IN DEED RECORDED IN - SOUTHEAST CORNER OF TRACT 1 ABOVE): BOOK 49 AT PAGE 12, PITKIN COUNTY CLERK AND RECORDER'S OFFICE C BEING ALSO THE THENCE SOUTH 125 FEET MORE OR LESS TO THE NORTH BANK THE ROARING FORK RIVER: -95 3 -1)\ ,,2>1*Witbri ~4 THENCE WESTERLY ALONG THE NORTH BANK OF THE ROARING FORK RIVER 305 FEET ~ BOOK 49 AT PAGE 124 PITKIN COUNTY CLERK AND RECORDER S OFFICE: - MORE OR LESS: - THENCE NORTH 150 FEET MORE OR LESS TO THE SOUTH LINE OF SAID TRACT DESCRIBED 94Â«.0,0.2.14 THENCE SOUTH 71 34 E 341.3 FEET TO THE PLACE OF BEGINNING. 0Â· ,-Â· -~ TRACT NO. 3 BEGINNING AT A POINT WHENCE THE WEST 1/4 CORNER OF SECTION 7, TOWNSHIP 10 SOUTH; RANGE 84 WEST OF THE 6th P.M., BEARS NORTH 200.00 FEET, AND WEST 938.6 1.2 \\ 64> .10\\ FEET,(THE TRUE POINT OF TRIANGULAR PARCEL MORE FULLY DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS): AND FLOODWAY ROAD A DISTANCE OF 300 FEET TO THE INTERSECTION OF SAID ROAD WITH THE NORTH 100 YEAR FLOOD PLAIN_/ THENCE SOUTHEASTERLY ALONG THE SOUTH RIGHT OF WAY LINE OF THE COUNTY 66\\ 7 BANK OF THE ROAR I NG FORK RIVER : I THENCE NORTHERLY AND WESTERLY ALONG THE NORTH BANK OF THE ROAR I NG FORK 1 -- - 444 - RIVER A DISTANCE 210.0 FEET TO THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF THAT CERTAIN TRACT -- DESCRIBED IN BOOK 49 AT PAGE 57, OFFICE OF THE P I TK IN COUNTY CLERK AND - RECORDER: THENCE NORTH 125.0 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING BEING THE SAME PROPERTY - DESCRIBED UPON DEED RECORDED IN BOOK 177 AT PAGE ~28, PITKIN COUNTY CLERK r - AND RECORDERS OFFICE. TRACT NO. 4 BEGINNING AT A POINT WHENCE THE WEST 1/4 CORNER OF SECTION 7, TOWNSHIP 10 SOUTH, RANGE 84 WEST OF THE 6th P.M.1 BEARS NORTH 175.06 FEET; AND WEST 938.6 FEET, THENCE S 44Â°29'24-E 159.10 FEET: SHADOW MOUNTAIN THENCE S 34Â°05 00-E 119.84 FEET: THENCE S 52Â°30-00-W 52 FEET MORE OR LESS TO THE APPARENT MEAN HIGH WATER LINE OF THE ROARING FORK RIVER: THENCE NORTH 32Â°06'24 WEST 258.90 FEET: THENCE 24.9 FEET MORE OR LESS TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING. EXCEPTING FROM THE ABOVE DESCRIBED PROPERTY THE FOLLOWING DESCRIBED -f- PROPERTY BEGINNING AT A POINT WHENCE THE WEST 1/4 CORNER OF SECTION 7, TOWNSHIP 10 THENCE 58.48 FEET ALONG A CURVE TO THE LEFT WHOSE RADIUS IS 153.33 FEET, CHORD SOUTH, RANGE 84 WEST OF THE 6th P.M.j BEARS WEST 802.70 FEET, THENCE EAST 63.49 FEET: ASPEN MOUNTAIN BEARS S 33Â°33'47-E 58.13 FEET: - THENCE SOUTH 85.62 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING OF TRACT 3 AMENDED: THENCE S 44Â°29'24-E 57.48 FEET: THENCE N 44029.24-W 118.55 FEET: THENCE 105.86 FEET ALONG A CURVE TO THE RIGHT WHOSE RADIUS IS 213.33 FEET, CHORD BEARS N 30Â°16'26-W 104.77 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING. INDEPENDENCE PASS \ CONTAINING 93,653 SO. FT. ./- PREPARED BY ASPEN SURVEY ENGINEERS, INC.. 210 SOUTH GALENA STREET NOTICE: ACCORDING TO COLORADO LAW YOU MUST COMMENCE ANY LEGAL ACTI.ON BASED UPON ANY DEFECT- ON THIS PLAT WITHIN THREE YEARS PHONE/FAX (970) 925-3816 ASPEN, COLORADO 81611 AFTER YOU FIRST DISCOVER SUCH DEFECT. IN NO EVENT MAY ANY ACTION BASED UPON ANY DEFECT IN THIS PLAT BE COMMENCED MORE THAN TEN YEARS FROM THE DATE OF THE CERTIFICATION SHOWN HEREON. THE DATE JOB CERTIFICATION IS VOID IF NOT WET STAMPED WITH THE SEAL oF THE SURVEYOR. SHEET 1 OF 2 3/01 26092G - 390 1 MEI -- - - 1. \ CURVE DELTA ANGLE RADIUS ARC CHORD CHORD BEARING ~ Cl 28Â°25'51 213-.33 105.86 104.77 S 30Â°16'26-E C 2 21051 14 153.33 58.48 58.13 N 33Â°33'47-W / 1 \ LEGEND AND NOTES 1 Â·./ k FOUND OR SET SURVEY MONUMENT AS DESCRIBED \ 1 --30' 1. 50 -1~ 0 50 - P.O.B.TRACT NO 1 0 30 60 P.O.B. RED MOUNTAIN ROAD R.O.W. A SURVEY CONTROL PO INT j \Â«946 11 \ BEARING ARE GEODETIC BASED ON CITY/COUNTY G.P,S. \ 8 \P WEST 562.6 EAST 376 ' ' ~ 1 ~\~39Â«-99 4111-- 20151 MONUMENTS 112 AND 111 N 05Â°43 01-W (GRID BEARING) ~ 947 72376 ~ - 3,663 S.F. ./- h ~ \ 63.49 C ~1$1' 1 j.,pmi --- WEST 1/4 CORNER SECTION 7, 1 - O UTILITY BOX ~ TOWNSH IP 10 SOUTH, RANGE ~I, 84 WEST OF THE 6,H P.M. l TRACT NO 1 / / L \ '9~*LD STOJk~ ~ MANHOLE 1954 B.L.M. BRASS CAP ~. ~ ~~~~i,ME)/0 < 0 UTILITY POLE 'ROUNDATIO - i j I \ ' 20' ~WER AND \\ ./ //k .1~ 1>1\ 88 144 2 ~ EASEMENT BK. 4 \\ \ BRASS CAP â‚¬ .4. AND SK. 378 434.- - 74- \ 1 / 21'9*2832*al 4 ,\ SO . 9 9 r. \1 1 1 - "~ ~~~ TITLE INFORMATION PROVIDED BY: / /// (5 93 . twr--4#- 9 \ TIE FOR HARRIS DITCH IS DOES NOT FIT 1 SFORMER EASEMENT LK'Â§49-2 DR E PG. 965 CASE NO. PCT 15608L PITKIN COUNTY TITLE, INC. f -/ 1# ,4/ / 4 '711 )#730/1 DATED: OCTOBER 6, 2000 C 71Â°36 39 W 989 .4/ 939 7 L/\ / j 4 5]Â£*. reo , ~ CALLS IN [ ] BOOK 49 AT PAGE 21 'LS SET \ 9 -/fI- 631 , (-,-,~ *2~~I PAVEMENT PARK*NG 1 1 ' WATERLINE E < OVERHEAD UT ILITIES 2 / 4 // 3 CAR rho t\ PORT 1 2 . CP-/ 4 7850 Pl 1 2... .... - 44\ 00 OUSE ~ \. P.O.B.TRACT NO. 4 G (\ 9 .7 24.0 0 1 5 OVERHANG 9184 r OUT ? PATIO - CERTIFICATION ( THE UNDERSIGNED STATES THAT THE PROPERTY DESCRIBED HEREON WAS Â·:~it:Â· .Â·EC.''~rh ALUM. ~ FIELD SURVEYED DURING ncr- ,7000 AND IS ACCURATE %k~~l~~~~~~;~ s DISCREPANCIES OF RECOR), BOUNDARY LI~IE CONFLICTS, ENCROACHMENTS, BASED ON THE F I ELD EV 1)ENCE AS SHOWN AND THAT THERE ARE NO P.O.B. TRACT NO. 2 AND/3 i EASEMENTS OR RIGHTS OF WAY IN FIELD EVIDENCE OR KNOWN TO ME EXCEPT AS HEREON SHOWN. UNDERGROUND UT ILITIES WITH NO ABOVE&ROUND .10 1 14. #/4 1<A ' 0 APPURTENANCES , AND iÂ·DQ~MENTS OF RECORD NOT SUPPLIED TO THE L \ 1 1 4,4 ~ it SURVEYOR ARE EXCEP)140 SURVEY IS VOID UNLESS WET STAMPED \ ~ WITH THE SEAK...OF THE.OÂ¢U*.R BELOW, \ 1,4 CID -Ex k . 1\3 1 444% JOHN/,1 l HOWORTH Pâ‚¬42.5?.~*59 07..0 90 ST"I O 19120 i..9 ATTACHMENT 5 0 '4 1. : 1 , # ,r?*' C#* Â· ,-9 / - < i %00 , 1 46 1 40 \ IMPROVEMENT SURVEY SET ' '1, OF FoRk ~~ ~ RANGE 84 WEST OF THE 6th PRINCIPAL MERIDIAN DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: THE FOLLOWING TRACTS OF LAND LOCATED IN SECTION 7, TOWNSHIP 10 SOUTH, RIVER j TRACT NO 1 40 1 51 BEGINNING AT CORNER NO. 1, A PINE POST WHENCE THE WEST 1/4 CORNER TO SECTION 7, \ TOWNSHIP 10 SOUTH, RANGE 84 WEST OF THE 6,11 P.M., BEARS WEST 562.6 FEET: U,S.L.M. BEARS S 28Â°04'E 3654,4 FEET: '~ UTE NO. 4 THENCE SOUTH 200 FEET: THENCE EAST 376 FEET: THENCE N 71'34.W 395.3 FEET: THENCE NORTH 75 FEET, TO THE PLACE OF BEGINNING. VARIATION OF 14.40.E. SLOPES GREATER THAN 30% r s.. A- *4 \- \4\ \' \ PAVED BIKE PATH P. \ TRACT NO. 2 BEGINNING THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF A TRACT DESCRIBED IN DEED RECORDED IN SOUTHEAST CORNER OF TRACT 1 ABOVE): BOOK 49 AT PAGE 12, PITKIN COUNTY CLERK AND RECORDER'S OFFICE C BEING ALSO THE THENCE SOUTH 125 FEET MORE OR LESS TO THE NORTH BANK THE ROARING FORK RIVER: THENCE WESTERLY ALONG THE NORTH BANK OF THE ROARING FORK RIVER 305 FEET MORE OR LESS: THENCE NORTH 150 FEET MORE OR LESS TO THE SOUTH LINE OF SAID TRACT DESCRIBED L \,14> THENCE SOUTH 71 34 E 341.3 FEET TO THE PLACE OF BEG INNING BOOK 49 AT PAGE 12, PITKIN COUNTY CLERK AND RECORDER'S OFFICE: 1 TRACT NO. 3 A A-J BEGINNING AT A POINT WHENCE THE WEST 1/4 CORNER OF SECTION 7, TOWNSHIP 10 SLOPES BETWEEN 20-30% 3 570 8,- Pr.,- / SOUTH, RANGE 84 WEST OF THE 6th P.M BEARS NORTH 200.00 FEET AND WEST 938.6 FEET,!THE TRUE POINT OF TRIANGULAR PARCEL MORE FULLY DESCRIBE6 AS FOLLOWS); ROAD A DISTANCE OF 300 FEET TO THE INTERSECTION OF SAID ROAD WITH THE NORTH 11\\ THENCE SOUTHEASTERLY ALONG THE SOUTH RIGHT OF WAY LINE OF THE COUNTY BANK OF THE ROARING FORK RIVER: THENCE NORTHERLY AND WESTERLY ALONG THE NORTH BANK OF THE ROARING FORK \ RIVER A DISTANCE 210.0 FEET TO THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF THAT CERTAIN TRACT DESCRIBED IN BOOK 49 AT PAGE 57, OFFICE OF THE PITKIN COUNTY CLERK AND RECORDER: *4 DESCRIBED UPON DEED RECORDED IN BOOK 177 AT PAGE <28, PITK;N COUNTY CLERK THENCE NORTH 125.0 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING BEING THE SAME PROPERTY -- AND RECORDERS OFFICE. TRACT NO. 4 , ~ BEGINNING AT A POINT WHENCE THE WEST 1/4 CORNER OF SECT ION 7 TOWNSHIP 10 SOUTH, RANGE 84 WEST OF THE 6th P.M., BEARS NORTH 175.06 FEE~, AND WEST 938.6 FEET, THENCE S 44Â°29 24-E 159.10 FEET: THENCE S 34Â°05'00'E 119.84 FEET: THENCE S 52Â°30'00'W 52 FEET MORE OR LESS TO THE APPARENT MEAN HIGH WATER LINE OF THE ROARING FORK RIVER: THENCE NORTH 32Â°06'24- WEST 258.90 FEET: THENCE 24.9 FEET MORE OR LESS TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING. EXCEPTING FROM THE ABOVE DESCRIBED PROPERTY THE FOLLOWING DESCRIBED PROPERTY BEGINNING AT A POINT WHENCE THE WEST 1/4 CORNER OF SECTION 7, TOWNSHIP 10 SOUTH, RANGE 84 WEST OF THE 6th P.M., BEARS WEST 802.70 FEET, THENCE EAST 63.49 FEET: THENCE 58.48 FEET ALONG A CURVE TO THE LEFT WHOSE RADIUS IS 153.33 FEET, CHORD BEARS S 33Â°33'47-E 58.13 FEET: THENCE S 44Â°29 24-E 57.48 FEET: THENCE SOUTH 85.62 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING OF TRACT 3 AMENDED: THENCE N 44Â°29 24-W 118.55 FEET: THENCE 105.86 FEET ALONG A CURVE TO THE RIGHT WHOSE RADIUS IS 213.33 FEET, CHORD BEARS N 30Â°16 26-W 104.77 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING. CONTAINING 93,653 SQ. FT. ./- PREPARED BY ASPEN SURVEY ENGINEERS, INC. 210 SOUTH GALENA STREET NOTICE: ACCORDING TO COLORADO LAW YOU MUST COMMENCE ANY LEGAL ACTION BASED UPON ANY DEFECT ON THIS PLAT WITHIN THREE YEARS PHONE/FAX (9701 925-3816 - ASPEN, COLORADO 81611 AFTER YOU F I RST DI SCOVER SUCH DEFECT. i N NO EVENT MAY ANY ACTION YEARS FROM THE DATE oF THE CERTIFICATION SHOWN HEREON. THE BASED UPON ANY DEFECT IN THIS PLAT BE COMIENCNED MORE THAN TEN CERTIFICATION IS VOID IP NOT WET STAMPED WITH THE SEAL OF THE 10/00 26092A SURVEYOR. DATE JOB - HiVd 3>118 'ONOO- '911 9 0 - 1 /1 /9. 59 ~1001 0 - â€¢,S' 1 3.05.54,1 09:.69 30Â¥BS OVO~l{Vyi i COTTLE n 0 GRAYBEAL 6 YAW 15' TOS SETBACK- STREAM MARGIN arcbitects 3~ PROGRESSIVE REVIEW ' P.O. Box 529 HEI~LIMIT 228 Midland Avenue BASALT, CO 81621 tel 970.927.4925 fax 970.927.8578 TOP OF SLOPE 510 East Hyman \ ASPEN, CO 81611 tel 970.925.2868 fax 970.925.2877 P.O. Box 3507 PROPOSED 107 North Fir Street DEVELOPMENT . | tel 970.728.303 TELLURIDE, CO 81435 fax 970.728.3236 P.O. Box 6337 37347 USHighway#6 Suite 200 1\\\ AVON, CO 81620 38 tel 970.748.1516 36 fax 970.748.1518 \1 aspen@cgyarchitects.com 1 54' 32 - 50 48 BELL 46 ~* RESIDENCE 42' 40' 38' 36 - - 34 32' STREAM MARGIN REVIEW BUILDING SECTION SCALE 1/8" = 1'-0 ~ ATTACHMENT ~ 1 (6, 1. 01- // ; 4#4\\ *1 2 1 ///// \ \\ / \03 f \ 1/4// 1 17 SHADY LAN / / 47 / 1 L 1 \\ \ Ililli / ~7 <31 14 dic h\ \ 11 1141 1 1 Ck- - - /1 *k~L,4 - \1\ \ 7830 1 '/'/Jift < / r \-// j 11 \A.f \\ ASPEN, Ii- . 01 â€ž 1 I /.- f~~ 4~ -4~~\< / 1 //// A COLORADO / c 1%,04~021 L <~.\\\ \ -\\\\\\ \\il / /Jjt; 14:0% \\>40\A Â¢ 3 \<4 \03* i I bil \_ /FJAI __ CHECKED BY: JD f &_ r. / FILE: STREAMMARGI N.DWG < f,4-.'LZZZ ZE 5 5Â· 3,-r 1 -X 1 1 DATE: 11/14/01 \3 71:Wt, f~ \///0/-27 f// ," 11'~460 DRAWN BY: JD 1 \14 - - A 0 / * / /\ ISSUE: PROGRESS 4 . 101 REVISIONS: 0 ) AL 4 1,,AÂ« \,TE--1 61/ /4 0 9 \\ 100 YEAR FLOOD PLAIN 4 3 i 7 -*Ir. 6 #80 - .50 \\1 V-<%&ty-- firp 0 ~ i//1 9 1/1 1 / 11/*AN#lmIP \ 1\) 1 / \ \3-1 lu Â· 2 2-'\ 11\ /15' TOS SETBACK- / STREAM MARGIN.*%. . % / REVIEW 1* /11 - *4 14 4 0 k>4.1;11. 2.172 - - ..., w-3 9% // // -12.4 44.1 O .Â© -2-- /-0- . 494. 1 Â°*. KiD i * 5 e, .4 ~ FLOODWAY / Th -- C \0 - - -4 Â»Ad. 2-~ . /\ \11// \9 L-- 5 i TOP OFL , 1 TOP OF // % SLOPE 4 14 SLOPE ~ <) 1 1 C 9 gl \-19334*4444 1~\ *--5/ \3 2 % ~ ZÂ»433134%3*1'6 '/~ ~ \ ROARING 01 , I. - 2 43Â»trlf 62Â«44, SET ~1 WI Â· 'ey <30/ 01--4-Izz-zz_%4000#,/a,>i / \ A <\ =ls,ZI:*#r'/Â©iliÂ» h \6 \\>.\4\\\\\\le\>\\22 \ , \\ \ \ 3.\\\\\,\r<> \3\\\ 14. STREAM \N\ \ V ' I \\\ 6 i \\\\ 96 MARGIN PAVED BIKE PATH REVIEW 91 -& \19\11\\\0\\0\\ SCALE: VARIES STREAM MARGIN REVIEW SITE MAP .d SCALE 1/32" = 1'-0" , 1 . SMR , Ra<Â»6\ .4 P, It. , too YEAR FLOOD PLAIN ~ AND FLOODWAY 6 \\ ' Â© COPYRIGHT - 200 1 COTTLE GRA YBEAL YAW ARCHITECT' ~:~,<00,6 MMON CPOUNC - â„¢ G1@l@1@1Â®1Â®lÂ®lÂ®1Â®lÂ®lÂ© DESIGNWORKSHOP Urban Design . Tourism Planning Landscape Architecture â€¢ Land Planning 1 Albuquerque . Aspenâ€¢Denverâ€¢Jackson , Sao Paulo . Santa Fe . Tempe â€¢ Lake Tahoe . Vail ~ ~TRAIL 9FT WIDE 94941 ~ 120 East Main Street Aspen, Colorado 81611 (970)-925-8354 2 . 1 P.O.B.TRAg 119.1 ---------------- ----=-6---9 Facsimile (970) 920-1387 f r /21// f .94(.,l 4 \ t WWW.DESIGNWORKSHOP.COM \ / 719// / 1 // j ) ' 1 \ 1 \ /OLD STONE \, \00\* 1 ( ~11 ./' . \ A '11 ~ 1 1 - \ 44(J' ' I Â· ' Aurm \ 1 f FOUNDATION \ 1311111 / \ L. / , T o- VIâ‚¬, ~, --'' I 'l .- & ..7, i i ' c'' 1 f.ft.tk \ 1 1,/ I \\ 1 fi 17* 4 up+ 4 WALL ' , |~ 2' STONE WALL DRIVEWAY 6'HT. STONE Â©r~ < 47 / \ BUILDING WALL 1 , \ 461 00 1 4 / I 45 44 Â· 1\. 1 00 2 CO . . / N \ i\\\ 1 \ 0 0 ", 1- - --I-N - . .~ - ..$- -9 K - =- ../ 43 I~#60 / -4./// / \ / 1 / +44 ' t . \12 /2,301/// 4..- ) X i .1 \ .S \ V.t,â‚¬00 0 9/2/<11 < h f 16 \ \ 1%16 / ///9 / 3 - 1 --54 1 3 10 STE ING STONES Â·./ , . -~ M I >â‚¬ I m LCH PATH h \ / '. 4 - \ 2 - 0 --//- 4 / N \ / 41... r 1 1 21 1 - / A .1 TRA,FV #- ity . 11/ / /7 , 0 44% L <L- -*-- *I'l \ / j-- -1 / 1 < 11 A. tkir i, 4 , - j Â·t~ 52 1 ~ ' ~Â· Â«-~ /'l ARCHITECTURAL BUILDING ENVELOPE (TYP.) . .A RFE 49.5 BO .- , il Â«42/ 00 /frs--ZE-Â»ZÂ« 27Â» 22 3-4!30 ./~FFE'79%0.5 i ~~-r--2- .r i. i l ...' -- Â·33 ' --Al- w- = .19 \ LANDSCAPE BUILDING ENVELOPE (TYP) 41 0 , 0 0 . V\ A \21\1' 4.4 , 1 I . 1 1->r .d --~5.62 4, 1 . i i. \\\I ;11 'll 9\ 78 f 1 g \ + lili'' , 5,90 .1. 1 1 1 i .. .. \ i // 1 ~ 4 0-/-- : 1 , 6 B EX SE 4 FFE 79 0.5 n //1 49 'k \ 1.1- li :6 1 , 0 1,50.83 0 ./\ \\1 Ar - '' i ') 11 \ 5083 *FFE 51.0 1. 1 11, .4, \Of\1 1 4 / i \ *111 /1 / 1 . I . . 1 10 .1 ..33 \â€ž \ 1 + -- t/,-," 60 - I ./ I SO.83 \ ~ 59 SPA, 1 ~Â· STONETERRACE 7/.4 \ IfildMÂ· 97/ 1 1, i 7 + 1 & ~ yj ~,y,~Â· r 21, @ TOS SETBACK 15 - / Â· ' < 1 1 FIRE PIT 1 1 Â»â€¢ c .4 ~ ........0. I , ' LOW STONE 44 80 ' / 1 A.\ '131 -1 \1 * 61 m 00 ,~ WALL (TYP,) 1 Â·Â· r-*. TOP OF, St . E . ~ '4 0 i f \% 4 4 0 ~ 54 J .1 0 6 + .406 4 / -410.63 14%,0 + . -/ \â‚¬ MEAN HIGH Â» i ARCHITECTURAL BUILDING - - C C tri -' 40. ,%9 ENVELOPE -9:I- h . Â· -70< \.Pit%3 -./. $ i % C C K - 4.1*~ <â€ž Â· \ \\ /* \ 1-4- 1Â«6 6 + 11 1% ROARING FORK RIVER 5 \ --- E --LE .j I *.-I-/4,- 784\ \32 11,\ 10 \ -- ./ 4 1 10 ' 63 ~ \ 4 LANDSCAPE BUILDING ENVELOPE (TYP) 0 ' 10.3 \ - ~ - ~- -- --0 0&. . ./0. -.' / k \.%.'?.,AL\~ \\. t Â® EXISTING EDGE OF RIPARiAN 01 (A \ / 91-1 1-t---1-, V - 0 VEGETATION 1 ATTACHMENT j D Â© - 61, \01 . ta6 .... 0 N Â· \ - 1 0,/ 700, \ 0 .: 3 \ 0% .........4- . \ 9 \ 1 I il - REN.EVIEW 1 . 1\ ./74 ; t Â£ : 1 ' 1 1 â€¢ 4. ~ . . f :I ''I.'1 .:/:~I...3:' '1 '\ \ 1 . 1 - X \ ./\ DITCH/RIVER \ '.\ ~ I h 1\.\ El] EL 1 1 1 ROARING FORK RIVER \\X \ i \ BIKE PATH ' , "'Â£~1<~'.(~~~ NORTH 0 10 20 40 ISSUE DATE: November 5,2001 0 REVISIONS 1 # DATE DESCRIPTION tz, 1 ~7 494,1 ... t\%. ..:\ \\Itt. \ 42 1 -- \3 \ 0 ..... - - \\.4 - 4 0 1 DRAWNÂ· 0 REVIEWED: ../ BUILDING ENVELOPE ' - SANITATION DISTRICTPROPERTY - 1/ \ Stream Margin The defined building envelope is divided into each of the following 1 Review areas: _ ARCHITECTURAL BUILDING ENVELOPE: Contains building and ~ hardscape, and terraces. PROJECT NUMBER: 2748 LANDSCAPE ENVELOPE: Contains grading and other landscape 1 features. \ Site & 1 . Grading Plan 1 ~ SHEET NUMBER % L2-1 0 1 Â® 1 @ 1 Â® 1 Â® 1 Â® 1 Â® 1 Â® Â® 1 0 1 0 1 OCOPYRIGHT D ESIGNWORKS H OP, INC. -----~ 04%L 00Â¥10100'NadSÂ¥ aNÂ¥1 AaÂ¥HS 100 YEAR FLOOD PLAIN F:\PROJECTS 11 Residence\D. CAD\DW-BELL-Sheet-Stream Margin Review.dwg ZONE C - Witdflower sod mix to be used in upland stream margin: DESIGNWORKSHOP ZONE B - Ornamental Plants: Landscape Architecture â€¢ Land Planning SCIENTIFIC WET- tNFLORF,4- SCIENTIFIC Urban Design . Tourism Planning NAME COMMON NAME LANI) & ENCE FLOWERING HEIGHT WILDLIFE LIGHT ELEVATION NAME COMMON NAME >41'A'l'LIS (24'LOR, SEASON BENEFITS Albuquerqueâ€¢ Aspenâ€¢Denverâ€¢Jackson Sao Patdo â€¢ Santa Fe â€¢ Tempe â€¢ Lake Tahoe â€¢ Vail : TiED 120 East Main Street \ Aspen, Colorado 81611 Acer glabrum Rocky Mountain Maple FAC Yellow/Green, Summer 5-25 ft Shelter Pt Sun- 5,000-10,500' Arabis alpina White Rock Cress (970)-925-8354 Cyme Shade ZONE B: ORNAMENTAL AND Facsimile (970) 920-1387 NATIVE PLANTS Aquilegia coerulea Colorado Columbine FAC Blue/White, Summer 1-3 ft Pt Sun 7,000-12,500' ,W None Aster bigerovii Purple Aster WWW.D ESIGNWORKSHO P.COM Raceme Aster Aspenlia odorata Sweet Woodruff White, Early Summer 0.5-lft Food Pt Sun- 4,000-8,500' ptamflcoides White Upland Aster Flower Shade s (Galium odoratum) % Blue/ Aster Geranium Geranium FAC,U Pink/Lavender Summer- 1-2 ft Food Pt Sun 5,300-9,400' tanacetifolius Prarie Aster ~ Bailey a multivariate Desert Marigold Cyme Fall 1 - ARCHITECTURAL BUILDING Lupinus argentus Silky Lupine Blue/White, Suminer to 3 ft None Full Sun 5,000-11,000' / ENVELOPE Raceine LANDSCAPE BUILDING Spring- 0.5-1.5 ft Food Pt-Full 5,500-10,000' Campanula caepatica Tussock Bellflower MS / -9. 49.. Mahonia repens Oregon Grape Holly Yellow, Sun t ZONE C NATIVE - :/f, ; A+0/V-I"* 1 /N 'ke.,.24Â«..>. 1 Raceme Summer : . WILDFLOWER MIX \ ENVELOPE 1 \ ZONE A: NATIVE n 1 -I. i./iiIA,q'miri#$$*/- /042/ 4,3.* /4:*34tri#' . Pachystima Mountain Lover Foliage/Shrub 2-4 ft Pt-Full Cheiranthus allionii Siberian Wallflower UPLAND PLANT .-X.,ar- Â·- RESTORATION ---1~ ---3L,,-0;W#~~ a iN&*ll .R--- "-- ~ - ----- --- ------ Sum ZONE C: NATIVE WILDFLOWER MIX myrsinites Chrysanthemum \ Physocarpus Mountain Ninebark FAC,U White, Summer 3-7 ft Food, Shelter Pt-Full 4,800-9,900' maximum Shasta Daisy \ 2/ 1 ZONE A; NATIVE UPLAND PLANT opulifolius Con/n-tb 1 -- - --7 ..1 M---' 16: .. fh i b -4 Sun RESTORATION 3=4-- F - I *- TBAÂ· *A..UUÂ· I'#- E Â»----- I r \ Â· 1 Â·44*q 91 . - 1. VÂ¢\ /Â¢ 14> 9. ZONE D: NATIVE WETLAND PLANT PAC 1-2 ft None Pt Sun 6,000-10,000' ' - RESTORATION (TO PROVIDE BANK Coreopsis lancelot Lance-leafed Coreopsis ~ ~ ~ ~ Polemonium caeruleum Jacob's Ladder Powder Blue, Early Surnnier ~IU~* ' Cyme , 4 1 1\ ~ Potentilla fruticosa Shrubby Yellow, ~ Summer 2-4 ft Full Sun 7,000-10,000 Dianthus deltoids Maiden Pinks \ Cknquefoil Flower YAL 1,1,8 94 0,y .. +4Â»U~- *::;ffÂ©Â¥' , -,1. \ Rubus parviflorus Thimbleberry FAC Summer 3-7 ft Food Pt Sun 7,000-10,000' White, Echinacea purpurea Purple Coneflower Cvme Food Full Sun 4,000-7.500' Aspen Daisy * Vanhoutte Spirea OBL 7-10 ft Eligeron specious & i:,--- ' Af 1 \ White, ~~ 11 - 1 vanhouttei -\ Flower ~ Spiraea -2-4-f44Â¥1Â·Â· 0 2-~3*rzo,1 -p \ Rudbeckia hirta Black-eyed Susan 2 j ZONE E& F: NATIVE #. *:4/4.' Â· . . 0 Oxeye Daisy White. BIue Sage 1 BANK RESTORATIONÂ»14*f" - .+ + . +-;''.-.\2~P~~41*. --~T,1." 1 \ ..... ~ Chrysanthemum Flower 4 Early Summer 1-2 ft Full Sun ATWATER'S EDGE 1% ~- 7~:~4 4-,2~-2,4 .--~~-~<~-9 *4~.--3 - ~~ ~ ~ leucanthenium Gaillardia antistatie Perennid Gaillardia I - .1 \ Salvia farinacea ..iljhz. Zike, - -=6-~-~4 \ ZONE D -Bank wetland restoration (Below top of slope): 0 - It. 4 \ \ SCIENTIFIC WE'1'- 1*Fl (IRF,4- : ~~~ NAME COMMON NAME LAND , EN(-'E FLOWERING HEINHT Wil DLIFF UGHT ELEVATION < STATUS â‚¬(11-OR, HEA~(IN BENt F iTt: Blue Flax : -,4 Linum perenne lewisii ~~L- ZONE E & F: NATIVE ' 2/2 -Â· - 1 \ ~ , BANK RESTORATION - t.i.2 $, 't Â«3.- 4 X \ T=j pli \ I. 4. -r Silko Lupine - AT WATER'S EDGE 11 \ - 1 9% 4 7 \ Lupinus argenteus ' i Alnus tenuifolia Thin-leaf Alder FAC,W Red/Brown, Summer to 30 ft Food, Pt-Full 5,000-10,000' Oenothera speciosa Catkin Showy Evening -4 . i 4, Nx P Cornus stolonifera Red-Omer Dogwood FAC,W White, 3-10 ft Pt Sun- 4,000-10,000' Poppy 4.4< Shelter Sun Foliage -to 0' ~ < ~\ Antennaria alpinum Rosey Pussytoes FAC Pink, Early Summer 3 in-1 ft None Full Sun 4,000-8,000' Prinlrose /9/0 -J \41 1 1 \ i \ 4 '% \ Papaver nudicaule Iceland 11. '. Cyrne Summer Shade Spring- Food 0\ 1. 4% 1 / COLORADO BLUE SPRUCE TO BEE Spring- Penstemon strictus | Rocky Mountain ~ Blue, None Full Sun 3,500-10,000' Penstemon S_j PLANTED ON SANITATION DISTRICT x< Iris missouriensis Rocky Mountain Ins OBL Summer 0.5-1.7 ft \ Raceme Best from bulbs BERM WITH SANITATION DISTRICT \, Â·.*F.,112 r \ . APPROVAL 4 p{294' ; 1 ' viola cornuta Johnny jump-up .1 Juncus articus Baltic Rush FAC,W Brown/Black, wa 3-4 ft Food, Fulll Sun 3,500-11,000' I - Paricle Shelter \\ I . I Viguiera multi-flora Showy Goldeneye 0 Juncus confusus Colorado Rush FAC,W Light Brown, Wa 3 in- 1.7 ft Limited Food, Full Sun 5,000-11,500' 7/ 1 Panicle Shelter I Lonicera FAC,U Pink/White, Late Spring Twinberry Pt Sun 3-5 ft Shelter Shade- 7,000-11,500' \.. 1 involucrata Honeysuckle Raceme \ , Ribes aureum Golden Currant FAC,W Yellow, Summer 3-8 ft Food Pt Sun 4,000-8,000' I \ I Raceme 1 \ Rosa woodsii Woods Rose FAC Pink, Spring- 1.5-7 ft Poor, Food Pt-Full Sun 3,500-10,500' Cyme Summer , ~ populus angustifolia Narrow-Leaf FAC Creamy White, Spring 25-65 ft Shelter Pt-Full Sun 5,000-8,500' , Cottonwood Catkin 1 \ \ e 0 \ ATTACHMENT _ -LL - , ZONE E - Bank restoration at water's edge: ZONE A-Bank upland restoration (Above top of slope): DRAWING KEY SC]ENTIFIC REL Apl I)HEN- ~ ' SciENT#Te WET- I#Fl AmiN- NAME COMMON NAME LAND C ENCE FLOWERING HEIGHT WILDLIFE LIGHT ELEVKnON ~ NAAIE COMMON NAME LAND 1 ENCE FLOWERING HEIGHT WILDLIFE LIGHT ~ELEVATION STA'f [ IS CY )LOR SEAS{)N BENEFITS STATUS l'{ II 4 IR, SEASON BRNEFITN ' i ZONE A: NATIVE UPLAND PLANT RESTORATION Tlrk | T1PF ET] n Amelanchier Mountain FAC,U White. Spring 3-13 ft Food, , Pt-Full 5,000-10,000' Betula glandulosa Bog Birch OBL Creamy White, Late Summer 1-4 ft Food, Pt-Full 7,500-11,400' alnifolia NORTH 0 10 20 40 Serviceberry Raceme Shelter Sun Shelter Sun Catkin kÂ·Â·Â· rÂ·Â·.Â·7 2 ZONE B: ORNAMENTAL AND NATIVE PLANTS White, Spring- Full Sun 6,000-11,500' Cornus stolonifera Red-Osier Dogwood FAC,W 3-10 ft Food Shade- 4,000-10,000' Carex aquatilis Water Sedge OBL Green/Black, n/a 0.5-3 ft Food ISSUE DATE: November 5, 2001 Cyme Summer Pt Sun Spike REVISIONS Dryopteris Colorado Male Fern 3 ft Shelter Pt Sun- Carex utriculata Beaked Sedge OBL Light Brown, Wa 1-4 ft Food Full Sun 6,500-11,000' # DATE DESCRIPTION ZONE C: NATIVE WILDFLOWER MIX filix-mas Shade Spike Yellow/ 2-3 ft Food Pt-Full 7,000-14,000' Physocarpus Mountain Ninebark FAC,U White, Summer 3-7 ft Food, Pt-Full 4,800-9.900' ~ Dechampsia Tufted Hairgrass OBL Brown, Sun Cool Seasons oputifolius Corymb Shelter Sun cespitosa Pal]#10 4*,*00,98,' ZONE D: NATIVE WETLAND PLANT ENHANCEMENT Picea pugens Colorado Blue Spruce FAC Foliage 30-100 ft Food, Full Sun < Equisetum hyemale Common Scouting Rush FAC,W 2-3 ft None Shade- 5,000-8,500' - Spling- - Spring ?%'.9:.3 3' Â·.*SU: nla Summer Shelter Full Sun Spring Shelter Full Sun 5,000-9,000' ~ Mertensia ciliata Streamside Alpine OBL, Blue, Summer- to 3 ft Food Pt Sun 5,500-13,000' Pinus ponderosa Ponderosa Pine Yellow/Red, 50-100 ft Flower Bluebells FAC,W Panicle Early Fall - Spring- Shelter ~ Catkin , + *+ * + ZONE E & F: NATIVE BANK RESTORATION AT WATER'S Choke Cherry FAC,U White, 5-30 ft Food, Pt-Full 4,500-10,000' Salix monticola Rocky Mountain Willow OBL Creamy White, Spring 5-13 ft Food Full Sun 5,700-11,500' DRAWN: REVIEWED: Prunus virginiana Sun +, + 2 EDGE Raceme Early Summer Scirpus acutus I Populus Narrow-Leaf FAC,W Creamy White, Spring 25-65 ft Shelter Pt-Full 6,000-8,500' (Schoenoplectus Hardstem Bulrush OBL Brown, rda 3-10 ft Food Full Sun 3,500-8,500' mbel Stream Margir angustifoIia Cottonwood Catkin Sun ' acutus) ! Scirpus pungens Redmrown, nia 1-4 ft PoolÂ· Food Full Sun 3,500-8,500' Review Populus Quaking Aspen FAC Creamy White, Spling 25-50 ft Food, Pt Sun 5,000-10,000' ~ (Schoenoplectus Common Threesquare OBL tremuloides Catkin Shelter Compact Panicle pugens) , - Ribes Gooseberry Green Spring- 3-4 ft Food Pt Sun 2,500-8,000' 1 Summer PROJECT NUMBER: 2748 Rosa woodsii Woods Rose FAC Pink, Spring- 2-7 ft Poor, Food Pt-Fuil Sun 3,500-10,500' ~ 1 Cyme Summer Landscape Salix Drummond's Willow FAC,W Brown/Black, Spring 7-20 ft Food Full Sun 6,000-11,000' drummondiana Catkin Symphoricarpos albus SnowbenÂ·y FAC,U White/Pink, Summer 2-5 ft Food Shade- j~~*~~~~ ~ * Planting Plan Flower Full Sun SHEET NUMBER OBL=Obligate, FAC=Facultative. W =Wetland, U =Upland OBL = Obligate, PAC = Facultative, W = Wetland, U = Upland L3-1 Wetland Status: Wetland Status: 1 0 | Â® | ~ | Â® | Â® | Â® | 0 | Â® Â® | 0 1 * Â©COPYRIGHTIESIGNWORKSHOP, INC. Â§E 1% 00~0103'NadSV CAD\DW-BELL-Sheet-Stream Margin Review~dwg 1 & W = 4, DESIGNWORKSHO Landscape Architecture â€¢ Land Planni Urban Design â€¢ Tourism Planning Albuquerqueâ€¢ Aspenâ€¢ Denverâ€¢Jackson Sao Paulo â€¢ Santa Fe â€¢ Tempe â€¢ Lake Tahoe â€¢ V Â® Aspen, Colorado 81611 120 East Main Street (970)-925-8354 Facsimile (970) 920-1387 1 WWW DESIGN WORKSHOPCC Â»Â«-110 PROPOSED RESIDENCE PROPOSED GRADE f Â»Vt T EXISTING COTTONWOODS TO EXISTING GRADE REMAIN 24 < A#*67 ~Ift * FFE 7949 , 6 kh. -4 7949.83 EXISTING GRADE C V t> B . .40 4 1 *1.111 .-. 7945 9 .-/ M j ' I '31 , /4,\ 4,VA L, 4 4110>yla Y 34) 56/39 1~~Ff i ~i - 1 *09 4 LUE"- 4 ti VA 3Â«y, r A /Â» y ky yÂ«Â·ix 11~*44#hy~(9~~4'696;F.LH<LI~(023 324%=-7 --, - 1-2231- ... - , ZONIA Native , ZONE B Omamental and ~ OUTDOOR COVERED ..0. ~, ZONE E&F Native ripartan plant ~ EXISTING VEGETATION TO REMAIN < uptand plant ,' TURF GRASS , Native Plants 1 restoration at naters edge i . restoration TERRACE 1 - .1 W ' - . - ' 1 ' 0 IZ . 2 , , ~ 1,el 10 12 , 1. /7\ SITE SECTION A ORIGINAL SCALE 3/16%=1'-0" '~/ PROPOSED RESIDENCE E- PROPOSED GRADE EXISTING GRADE MEETS - PROPOSED GRADE ~ i $ FFE 7950 5 \ &2Â»C,-*920Â£4TW 7948 --1 1 EXISTING GRADE drt. 11,?5}/ . 14$5**104-~1,71---- - RO 19*01/IRUE.E.-b.#.Â®c-, tly .te-' 1 ZONE D Native ' WELL ~~~ ~ EXISTING VEGETATION TO REMAIN wetiand plant ,' TURF GRASS ,' IRREGULAR FL .~TONESTAIRS , LIGHT : restor,Don . O - . , , i ..il t= 0 . I I . ATTACHMENT 1 2. '2 'L ' ./ ' 0 4 6 k /93 SITE SECTION B ~ &I ~ ORIGINAL SCALE 3/16â€¢=1'-0" 14 4& i - EVERGREEN PLANTING EXISTING GRADE MEETS PROPOSED GRADE EXISTING GRADE MEETS PROPOSED GRADE 7.2, RED MOUNTAIN ROAD 1'124411\ 11 1 - 47'149'*#fl~~Mj.44*aer. , 1 ?A> 4 3. U \ /141 y , f â€ž / : 0 h 0,9 1 Â»122/te:L.:Wjer,i lit .1- 'r/ ISSUE DATE November 5,2001 REVISIONS 1 -- # DATE DESCRIPTION L-- EXISTING GRADE ' 1 /42/ ly ./ , 1 i EXISTING PONDEROSAPINE 4 2 TO REMAIN *741 @ -Â« 3\/t.t ' '4% EXISTING VEGETATION , DRAWN REVIEWED TO REMAIN ~ ZONE A- Native uoland plant restoration - 1 , I:, - 1 1/lf ' . - I '- r ' Stream Margi f 9 /1 4 1 936%~' â€¢I ' 4 : ' ' 3%. ~ ' ' 2'~ , Review - 7937+ 0 1 ' ' i ~ ' ' - PROJECT NUMBER 2748 1, ZONE D Native wetland , , ~ , , EXISTING VEGETATION AND GRADE TO REMAIN , i plant restoration 1 ' ' Site IZE Sections I. 12* . - . --4 I SHEET NUMBER /33 SITE SECTION C 88 ORIGINAL SCALE 3/16â€¢=1Â·-01' L4-1 LL L Â® 0 Â© Â©COPYRIGHTIESIGNWORKSHOPINC 1 1138 N331100 9 00Â¥klO1O0'NadSÂ¥ EINÂ¥1 Aa 30N3GIS3kI 1138 ECTS_A-L\Bell Residence\D CAD\DW-Bell-Model-Sections dwg 2001 - 11 31 am 1 1 8 0 DESIGNWORKSHOP Landscape Architecture . Land Planning Urban Design Â· Tourism Planning I I Albuquerque â€¢ Aspenâ€¢ Denve, â€¢ Jackson Sao Paulo â€¢ Santa Fe â€¢ Tempe â€¢Lake Tahoe â€¢ Vail . 120 East Main Street Aspen, Colorado 81611 (970)-925-8354 Facsimile (970) 920-1387 WWW,DESIGN W ORKSHOP.COM -- ------------- -'---.--*-*--.------------1 \ >O-1 ---- 4 / I \19 0 1 1 lf<11-1111-1 htl- \< 2 / \ \ 7.t\:r 4â€¢ Â»eULS.... 1. --3 < 1 I ... I . r//0.f \ 0 ./6, : 40 -00â€¢Â»Â« . n /10\ I .1 0 1\0< 1 1 ///5,00 / 0 4 74 1\\ - 4 .1 0 1 -7 /5/0 <44 e . e L.I'*:5\%.dz %59.11% .. 1- AN 0 /7 Â« \/ rf . ./4 F /. 1 *- \ LItÂ· tr' Â·1 4 - 3- /m - ARCHITECTURAL- ~ \ 1 C BUILDING ENVELOPE ~ . 6Â°.., - --11 ~ 0 0.0.\/ ... :~ A -0 - P YVPFFE 79164 Â· - \ 1 1 1 4 3 i 0 :\ / +xI ... 1 /-14> 9 v )1- 0. 7850 - 0 0. 00 ' .A,\ @ t 1. 1... .5 .f' 13 1 \ 1 i , 1 f..... 4 V.1 & a .\ i \ A J ..i >F'-'~Fj 0.- .9 0 A . 1\ \ i 49//A \1 \ \ 1 142 ,Â·-4-- f 0 Â·./..... /f//07 1 0,0 f 1 \ - R.... . \.--- I A \ / Â»44 -. -' ./Â£\Â· Â·Â· Â·....j>':Â·Â· ,Â· 1Â·Â·:4:Â·Â·Â·:~ -%Â·,- -. \ Â·--Il I \ Â·Â· 1 \ L 1 06- i Â·f. %---- \ r-4- 0 04 ---- --4--- 94 9 \\ i - -".6 ....-.. \ -- 1% 0, 1 4 0,4 1 \ . EXISTING RIPARIAN N : 9. #447' 1.+24 2.-it--41Â·411 ~ - AX \ VEGETATION EDGE N ATTACHMENT 13 \74 1\42 \ \ - 1#-42*: '07.FAr 0 LANDSCAPE BUILDING ~ 1 - - 7 - ENVELOPE ~ \ ..., 'r : f~ 0 *62Â«41___ , % ....... -:-,-,- . - 7. N 'K \ 7 \ 1 . . . . 4 1,0 X 0. f..t: \46 ' 0 i 1 , i 25 1 1 N-)\ \1 -- ~~ Â· ~\ NORTH 0 10 20 40 1 4* i \ , ...6.#' , \\ 1 \ * \ ISSUE DATE: November 5,2001 O 0 0-..0 F 110)/.i i-_i_ DATE DESCRIPTION 1 ' ~ \-47.-- \ REVISIONS 0.1 1 i. \A / - DRAWING KEY t : h CAAnAAA- ..: 14 3 /\/%/\/\/\/\/ Existing Healthy Tree Removed: 1 Total \ )000000 h , \ 0 -- - \ - -- % , \. r \ - 4 h ,% 1% 1 i Existing Tree in Decline Removed: 12 Total (2 of the 12 are in ~ . \4X /1\ .. . 1% , .. 14 1 - 0 , severe decline and are a safety hazzard) %\ ~ DRAWN: REVIEWED: . ' 3, 0 -/. 1 Stream Margin u Existing Hardscape/ Grass Within 100' Setback : 17,575 SF i Â· * ~ ~ v Review *4~55 Proposed Hardscape/ Grass Within 100' Setback: 8,700 SF. ,'II!. Hardscape/ Grass area has been reduced by 8,875 SF. PROJECT NUMBER: 2748 Existing Grade and Vegetation to Remain in this area. Native Plant revegetation and restoration to occur in selected areas as , Site shown on the planting plan: 26,800 SF Total Mitigation 6 B ' SHEET NUMBER 8 2 ' ' 12 ~- , 1 L5-1 LL 0 1 @ 1 *OPYRIGHT DESIGNWORKSHOP, INC 00Â¥kl0100'NadSÂ¥ 3NV1 AaVHS _A-L\Bell Residence\D. CAD\DW-BELL-SITE ANALYSIS.dwg - 12:30pm