Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutagenda.apz.20230620AGENDA ASPEN PLANNING & ZONING COMMISSION June 20, 2023 4:30 PM, Pearl Pass Meeting Room 3rd Floor, 427 Rio Grande Pl, Aspen I.ROLL CALL II.COMMENTS III.MINUTES IV.DECLARATION OF CONFLICT OF INTEREST V.PUBLIC HEARINGS V.A Lot 11 Callahan Subdivision | Stream Margin Review | Determination of Pre- Development Topography VI.OTHER BUSINESS VII.BOARD REPORTS VIII.ADJOURN Lot 11 Callahan Subdivision_Development Proposal_Memo_Stream Margin Review_P&Z.pdf Resolution No. X Series 2023_TBD Crystal Lake Road_Stream Margin Review_Historic Pre-Development Topography.pdf Exhibit A_Stream Margin Review Standards.pdf Exhibit B_P&Z Resolution No. 8, Series 2021_Stream Margin Review_TBD Crystal Lake Road.pdf Exhibit C_Application_COMBINED.pdf Exhibit D_Public Comments Received.pdf TYPICAL PROCEEDING FORMAT FOR ALL PUBLIC HEARINGS 1) Conflicts of Interest (handled at beginning of agenda) 2) Provide proof of legal notice (affidavit of notice for PH) 3) Staff presentation 4) Board questions and clarifications of staff 5) Applicant presentation 6) Board questions and clarifications of applicant 1 1 7) Public comments 8) Board questions and clarifications relating to public comments 9) Close public comment portion of bearing 10) Staff rebuttal/clarification of evidence presented by applicant and public comment 11) Applicant rebuttal/clarification End of fact finding. Deliberation by the commission commences. No further interaction between commission and staff, applicant or public 12) Chairperson identified the issues to be discussed among commissioners. 13) Discussion between commissioners* 14) Motion* *Make sure the discussion and motion includes what criteria are met or not met Revised January 9, 2021 2 2 Page | 1 MEMORANDUM TO: Aspen Planning & Zoning Commission FROM: Kevin Rayes, Senior Planner THRU: Amy Simon, Planning Director RE: Lot 11 Callahan Subdivision | Stream Margin Review | Determination of Pre-Development Topography MEETING DATE: June 20, 2023 Applicant: Callahan Crystal Lake LLC, an Indiana Limited Liability Company, c/o David Eskenazi, Operating Member, 10689 N. Pennsylvania St. #100 Indianapolis, IN 46280 Representative: Chris Bendon, Bendon Adams, 300 So. Spring St. #202, Aspen, CO 81611 Location: #TBD, Crystal Lake Road, Aspen, CO 81611, Legally described as Lot 11, Callahan Subdivision, recorded May 19, 1976, in plate books 5 at page 7 and first amendment thereto recorded August 17, 1977, in plat book 6 at page 16 and second amended plat recorded October 4, 1982, in plat book 13 at page 92. County of Pitkin. State of Colorado. Current Zoning: Moderate Density Residential (R-15) with a Planned Development (PD) overlay Summary: The subject lot is located within the Stream Margin Review area of the Roaring Fork River and is currently undeveloped. The Applicant requests approval of Stream Margin Review and a determination of pre- development topography to develop a single-family dwelling. Staff Recommendation: Staff recommends the Planning & Zoning Commission approve the request for Stream Margin Review and the proposed determination of pre-development topography to develop the site with a single-family dwelling, subject to the conditions in the attached resolution. Lot 11 Callahan Subdivision/PUD Figure 1: Subject Property Location 3 Page | 2 REQUEST OF THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION: The Applicant is requesting the following approval from the Planning and Zoning Commission: • Stream Margin Review: (Land Use Code Section 26.435.40): A property located within one hundred feet of the high-water line of the Roaring Fork River and its tributary streams, or within the Flood Hazard Area is considered an Environmentally Sensitive Area and is subject to heightened review for any development. The proposed scope of work triggers a one-step review from the Planning and Zoning Commission. The Planning and Zoning Commission is the final review body. • Pre-Development Grade: Pursuant to Land Use Code Section 26.575.020, Calculations & Measurements, in instances where the natural grade of a property has been affected by prior development activity, the Community Development Director may accept an estimation of pre-development topography prepared by a registered land surveyor or Civil Engineer. In conjunction with the request for Stream Margin Review, the Applicant seeks to memorialize an estimated pre-development topography. BACKGROUND: The Callahan Subdivision and Planned Development (PD) was approved in 1976. Lot 11 sits adjacent to the Roaring Fork River and is located within the Moderate Density Residential (R-15) zone district. The property is currently vacant with no previous development history. Given its proximity to the Roaring Fork River, a large portion of the lot is located within the Stream Margin Review area, which is considered environmentally sensitive and requires heightened review for any development proposed in the area. The City maintains a set of maps depicting properties that are located within the Stream Margin Review Area. From these maps, the Top-of-Slope of each property is identified based on the location of the 100-foot high water line of the river. The Land Use Code prohibits development (other than approved native vegetation planting) below the Top-of- Slope or within fifteen feet of the Top-of-Slope or the high-water line, whichever is most restrictive. This is intended to protect the existing riparian vegetation and bank stability. In 2021, the Planning & Zoning Commission granted Stream Margin Special Review to establish an alternative Top-of-Slope to better reflect onsite-conditions via Resolution #08, Series of 2021. (Figure 2, depicts the alternative top-of-slope that was approved by P&Z.) The request for Stream Margin Review and Special Review for an alternative Top-of-Slope were intended for due diligence purposes only. No development was proposed in the previous application. Stream Margin Review is required for any development that is proposed, which is the subject of this application. Figure 2: Alternative Top of Slop Approved via P&Z Resolution #08, Series 2021 100-ft. top of slope setback 4 Page | 3 PROJECT SUMMARY: The Applicant plans to improve the property with a single-family dwelling. Because the property is located within the Stream Margin Review Area, heightened review is required for the environmentally sensitive area. While undergoing due diligence and design, it was determined that portions of natural grade were manipulated to accommodate development of Crystal Lake Road to the north, a bike path to the west, a driveway associated with an adjacent property to the east, a primitive road on the subject property and an emergency spillway for Crystal Lake. Pursuant to Land Use Code Section 26.575.020, Calculations & Measurements, in instances where the natural grade of a property has been affected by prior development activity, the Community Development Director may accept an estimation of pre-development topography prepared by a registered land surveyor or Civil Engineer. In conjunction with the request for Stream Margin Review, the Applicant seeks to memorialize an estimated pre-development topography. STAFF COMMENTS: Staff finds that the application meets the Stream Margin Review Standards set forth in Land Use Code Section 26.435.040.C (Exhibit A). Normally when Stream Margin Review standards are met and no variations or Special Review is requested, Stream Margin Review can be processed administratively. However, this lot has never undergone development, and given the scope of work proposed, staff believes review from Planning & Zoning Commission is appropriate. As depicted in Figure 3, all improvements are located at least fifteen feet outside the top-of-slope that was previously approved by the Planning & Zoning Commission. While some vegetation will be removed a nd impacted as part of the development process, the Parks Department has included several conditions to preserve native vegetation and to ensure new landscaping complies with City standards. For example, a permit is required for any trees slated for removal, and only approved native vegetation is allowed within fifteen feet of the top -of-slope. As previously mentioned, natura l grade on certain areas of the property has been impacted by prior development activity. The Applicant requests a historic grade determination from P&Z to memorialize the topography prior to development activity. Upon review of the application, the Engineering Department agrees with the historic topography represented in the application. Some grading will be required to rectify the altered topography of the site and to accommodate the driveway and footprint of the home. All grading is limited to areas of the property located at least fifteen feet from the top -of-slope. As previously mentioned, this property has never been developed, which means basic infrastructure improvements Approved top-of-slope (P&Z Reso. #08-2021) Figure 3: Proposed Site Plan 5 Page | 4 and adjustments are needed. One such improvement consists of rerouting the outfall of Crystal Lake. The lake is currently piped to the northwest corner of Lot 11. From there, water pass through the lot towards the Roaring Fork River. Development of the property means piping the lake water across the lot is no longer feasible. The Applicant is working with the Engineering Department and the Aspen Club HOA to determine the best path forward. A condition of approval is included in the resolution to ensure this is adequately addressed prior to building permit. Lastly, it’s worth noting that the proposed dwelling does not infringe into the 45 -degree progressive height limit as required by code. RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends the Planning and Zoning Commission (P&Z) approve this application subject to the conditions included in the resolution. ATTACHMENTS: Resolution #___, Series of 2023 Exhibit A | Stream Margin Review Standards | Staff Findings Exhibit B | P&Z Resolution #08, Series 2021 Exhibit C | Application Exhibit D | Public Comments Received . Figure 4: Example of a home that does not infringe into the 45-degree progressive height limit Figure 5: Proposed Development does not infringe into 45-degree progress height limit 6 P&Z Resolution #XX, Series of 2023 Page 1 of 4 RESOLUTION # XX (SERIES OF 2023) A RESOLUTION OF THE ASPEN PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION APPROVING STREAM MARGIN REVIEW AND MEMORIALIZING A DETERMINATION OF HISTORIC PRE-DEVELOPMENT TOPOGRAPHY FOR THE PROPERTY LOCATED AT #TBD CRYSTAL LAKE ROAD, ASPEN, CO 81611 LEGALLY DESCRIBED AS LOT 11, CALLAHAN SUBDIVISION, RECORDED MAY 19, 1976 IN PLAT BOOK 4 AT PAGE 7 AND FIRST AMENDMENT THERETO RECORDED AUGUST 17, 1977 IN PLAT BOOK 6 AT PAGE 16 AND SECOND AMENDED PLAT RECORDED OCTOBER 4, 1982 IN PLAT BOOK 13 AT PAGE 92. COUNTY OF PITKIN, STATE OF COLORADO. Parcel No. 2737-181-32-011 WHEREAS, the Community Development Department received an application from Callahan Crystal Lake LLC, an Indiana Limited Liability Company, c/o David Eskenazi, Operating Member, 10689 N. Pennsylvania St. #100 Indianapolis, IN 46280 (Applicant), requesting approval for the following land use reviews: • Stream Margin Review pursuant to Land Use Code Section 26.435.040 • A determination of Historic Pre-Development Topography pursuant to Land Use Code Section 26.575.020.f.3.b WHEREAS, the Community Development Department Staff reviewed the application for compliance with the applicable review standards; and, WHEREAS, the Engineering, and Parks Departments provided referral comments to the Community Development Department; and, WHEREAS, upon review of the application, the applicable Land Use Code standards, and the alternative top of slope memorialized via P&Z Resolution #08, Series of 2021, the Community Development Director recommended approval of the request for Stream Margin Review and a determination of Historic Pre-Development Topography; and, WHEREAS, the City of Aspen Planning and Zoning Commission has reviewed and considered the development proposal under the applicable provisions of the Municipal Code as identified herein, has reviewed and considered the recommendation of the Community Development Director, and has taken and considered public comment at a duly noticed public hearing on June 20, 2023; and, 7 P&Z Resolution #XX, Series of 2023 Page 2 of 7 WHEREAS, the City of Aspen Planning and Zoning Commission finds that the development proposal meets the applicable review criteria and that the approval of the request is consistent with the goals and objectives of the Land Use Code; and, WHEREAS, the Planning and Zoning Commission approves Resolution #XX, Series of 2023, by a X to X (X-X) vote, granting approval of Stream Margin Review and a determination of Pre-Development Topography. NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED by the Aspen Planning and Zoning Commission: Section 1: Stream Margin Review: Pursuant to the procedures and standards set forth in Title 26 of the Aspen Municipal Code, t he Planning and Zoning Commission hereby approves a Stream Margin Review with the following conditions of approval: ❖ Parks: • At the time of building permit, a fence shall be erected along the top of slope setback line to keep all activity out of the area and to maintain the native condition. Any plantings shall be reviewed by the City Forester. • Any walls or excavation required within tree driplines shall require approval from the City Forester and may require air-spading of roots within tree driplines and tree trunk protection measures. • Remove path represented within the top-of-slope setback. No development other than approved native vegetation planting shall take place below the top of slope or within fifteen feet of the top of slope or highwater line, whichever is most restrictive. New plantings (including trees, shrubs, flowers, and grasses) outside of the designated building envelope on the river side shall be native riparian vegetation as approved per City Code Section 26.435.040 – C.8. • At the time of building permit, a tree removal permit shall be submitted for any trees proposed for removal. • Six (6) foot fence protection shall be installed at the driplines of all trees not designated for removal. No storage of material, equipment, nor any development activity shall be permitted within the tree protection fencing. • The seed mix and any broadcast of seed in the area between the river and the top of slope setback shall be reviewed by the City Forester. • Multi-stem trees shall not count towards offsetting mitigation. • All plantings within tree driplines and within the top of slope offset area shall require City Forester approval. Engineering: • The Crystal Lake Overflow Outlet Pipe shall be rerouted to the satisfaction of the City of Aspen Engineering Department prior to issuance of a building permit. ▪ The pipe shall not be located within any utility easements. ▪ The revised location of the pipe may need to be updated on a plat once constructed. • All easements should generally be clear of encumbrances (Mature trees, retaining walls, etc.) • Foundation drains shall not drain into stormwater drywells. 8 P&Z Resolution #XX, Series of 2023 Page 3 of 7 • No development, including stormwater and drainage infrastructure shall be permitted within the top-of-slope and top-of-slope setback. • At the time of building permit, the Applicant shall follow the requirements of a major development within the Urban Runoff Management Plan. ▪ The rain garden appears to come up towards foundation walls. The Applicant shall address concerns on how infiltration/detention will affect the foundation. • Current Engineering Standards and Utility Standards shall apply at the time of building permit. ▪ Mature trees shall not be placed over a water service line. Section 2: Determination of Historic Pre-Development Topography Pursuant to the procedures and standards set forth in Title 26 of the Aspen Municipal Code, the Planning and Zoning Commission hereby memorializes the historic pre-development topography represented in Exhibit A of this resolution. Section 3: Applicable Provisions This approval does not exempt the project from compliance with applicable zoning, building, or any other applicable code regulations within the City of Aspen’s Municipal Code. The Applicant must submit a building permit application demonstrating compliance with all applicable codes prior to any development on site. Section 4: Material Representations All material representations and commitments made by the Applicant pursuant to the development proposal approvals as herein awarded, whether in public hearing or documentation presented before the Planning and Zoning Commission, are hereby incorporated in such site development approvals and the same shall be complied with as if fully set forth herein, unless amended by an authorized entity. Section 5: Existing Litigation This resolution shall not affect any existing litigation and shall not operate as an abatement of any action or proceeding now pending under or by virtue of the ordinances repealed or amended as herein provided, and the same shall be conducted and concluded under such prior ordinances. Section 6: Severability If any section, subsection, sentence, clause, phrase, or portion of this resolution is for any reason held invalid or unconstitutional in a court of competent jurisdiction, such portion shall be deemed a separate, distinct and independent provision and shall not affect the validity of the remaining portions thereof. APPROVED by the Commission at its meeting on June 20, 2023. 9 P&Z Resolution #XX, Series of 2023 Page 4 of 7 APPROVED AS TO FORM: PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION: ________________________________ ______________________________ Katharine Johnson, Assistant City Attorney Teraissa McGovern, Chair ATTEST: ____________________________ Mike Sear, Deputy City Clerk 10 P&Z Resolution #XX, Series of 2023 Page 5 of 7 Exhibit A: Approved Historic Pre-Development Topography 11 P&Z Resolution #XX, Series of 2023 Page 6 of 7 Exhibit A: Approved Historic Pre-Development Topography 12 P&Z Resolution #XX, Series of 2023 Page 7 of 7 Exhibit A: Approved Historic Pre-Development Topography 13 Exhibit A Stream Margin Review Standards Staff Findings Page 1 of 3 26.435.040.C, Stream Margin Review Standards No development shall be permitted within the stream margin of the Roaring Fork River unless the Community Development Director makes a determination that the proposed development complies with all requirements set forth below: 1. It can be demonstrated that any proposed development which is in the Special Flood Hazard Area will not increase the base flood elevation on the parcel proposed for development. This shall be demonstrated by an engineering study prepared by a professional engineer registered to practice in the State which shows that the base flood elevation will not be raised, including, but not limited to, proposing mitigation techniques on or off -site which compensate for any base flood elevation increase caused by the development . Staff findings: When P&Z approved Resolution No. 8, Series 2021 the alterative top of slope that was memorialized is set back from Special Flood Zone X and Flood Zone AE. The land use code does not allow any development below the top of slope (towards the river) or 15-ft. setback from the top of slope. Any development proposed now or in the future shall comply with this standard ensuring that that b ase flood elevations will not be impacted. Staff finds this criterion to be met. 2. The adopted regulatory plans of the Open Space and Trails Board and the Roaring Fork River Greenway Plan are implemented in the proposed plan for development, to the greatest extent practicable. Areas of historic public use or access shall be dedicated via a recorded easement for public use. A fisherman's easement granting public fishing access within the high-water boundaries of the river course shall be granted via a recorded "Fisherman's Easement." Staff findings: The proposed development will not impact the Open Space and Trails Board and Roaring Fork River Greenway Plans. Staff finds this criterion to be met. 3. There is no vegetation removed or damaged or slope grade changes (cut or fill) made outside of a specifically defined building envelope. A building envelope shall be designated by this review and said envelope shall be designated by this review and said en velope shall be recorded on a plat pursuant to [Land Use Code Section26.435.040.f.1. Staff findings: When P&Z reviewed the application for an alternative top -of-slope in 2021, a building envelope was memorialized via Resolution #08, Series of 2021. No development is allowed below (riverside) of the established top of slope or fifteen ft. above the top -of- slope. The site plans and civil engineering plans sufficiently show that no development will occur within these areas. Staff finds this criterion to be me t. 4. The proposed development does not pollute or interfere with the natural changes of the river, stream or other tributary, including erosion and/or sedimentation during construction. Increased on-site drainage shall be accommodated within the parcel to prevent entry into the river or onto its banks. Pools or hot tubs cannot be drained outside of the designated building envelope. Staff findings: Several conditions of approval are included in the resolution requiring sufficient erosion control, sedimentation, and construction management practices. All 14 Exhibit A Stream Margin Review Standards Staff Findings Page 2 of 3 drainage from the building and other impervious surfaces will be directed to on -site stormwater infiltration and not directed towards the river. Staff finds this criterion to be met. 5. Written notice is given to the Colorado Water Conservation Board prior to any alteration or relocation of a water course and a copy of said notice is submitted to the Federal Emergency Management Agency. Staff findings: Alteration to the water course is not proposed within this application . Any future impacts or development will be subject to applicable reviews. Staff finds this criterion to be not applicable. 6. A guarantee is provided in the event a water course is altered or relocated, that applies to the developer and his heirs, successors and assigns that ensures that the flood carrying capacity on the parcel is not diminished . Staff findings: Alteration to the water course is not proposed as part of this application. Any future impacts to water courses are subject to applicable reviews. Staff finds this criterion to be not applicable. 7. Copies are provided of all necessary federal and state per mits relating to work within the 100-year flood plain. Staff findings: No work is proposed within the 100 -year floodplain. Any future work within the 100-year flood plain will trigger a subsequent stream margin review and require any applicable federal and state permits. Staff finds this criterion not applicable. 8. There is no development other than approved native vegetation planting taking place below the top of slope or within fifteen (15) feet of the top of slope or the high waterline, whichever is most restrictive. This is an effort to protect the existing riparian vegetation and bank stability. New plantings (including trees, shrubs, flowers and grasses) outside of the designated building envelope on the river side shall be native riparian vegetation as approved by the City. A landscape plan will be submitted with all development applications. The top of slope and 100 -year flood plain elevation of the Roaring Fork River shall be determined by the Stream Margin Map located in the Community Development Department and filed at the City Engineering Department . Staff findings: No development will be allowed within fifteen feet of the top -of-slope. Native vegetation may be permitted by the Parks Department at the time of building permit. Staff finds this criterion to be met. 15 Exhibit A Stream Margin Review Standards Staff Findings Page 3 of 3 9. All development outside the fifteen (15) foot setback from the top of slope does not exceed a height delineated by a line d rawn at a forty-five (45) degree angle from ground level at the top of slope. Height shall be measured and determined by the Community Development Director using the definition for height set forth at Section 26.04.100 and method of calculating height set forth at [Land Use Code Section 26.575.020 as shown in Figure "A"]. Staff findings: The proposed deign does not infringe into the 45-degree progressive height limit. The Applicant has provided sufficient documentation to demonstrate this. Staff finds this criterion not applicable. 10. All exterior lighting is low and downcast with no light(s) directed toward the river or located down the slope and shall be in compliance with [Land Use Code Section 26.575.150]. A lighting plan will be submitted with all development applications . Staff findings: A lighting plan is included in the application and meets the provisions of Land Use Code Section 26.575.150. All lighting is low, downcast, and directed away from the river. While the application identifies specifics fixtures and manufacturers, such specifications may change at the time of building permit subject to meeting all provisions of the lighting code. Staff finds this criterion to be met. 11. There has been accurate identification of wetlands and riparian zones. Staff findings: The wetland delineation report included in the application provides information on species and soil conditions. The report does not recommend changing the top-of-slope determination previously approved by P&Z. Staff finds this criterion to be met. 16 17 18 19 20 300 SO SPRING ST | 202 | ASPEN, CO 81611 970.925.2855 | BENDONADAMS.COM January 30, 2023 Amy Simon Planning Director City of Aspen 457 Rio Grande Place Aspen, CO 81611 RE: #tbd Crystal Lake Road; Lot 11, Callahan Subdivision Stream Margin Review Ms. Simon: Please accept this Stream Margin Review application for the vacant parcel along Crystal Lake Road. Lot 11 of the Callahan Subdivision is currently vacant and fronts the Roaring Fork River. The 1.1-acre parcel is zoned R-15 (Moderate-Density Residential) and allows for the development of one or two residences in an attached or detached configuration. The property received Special Review and Stream Margin Review approval by the City’s Planning and Zoning Commission to establish the top-of-slope. Approval documents are attached. The previous application was initiated by the previous owner in order to prepare the property for sale. The previous application did not include a design for the property, only analysis of the river setback. The image to the right shows the approved Stream Margin Map The property has since transacted and a design for a new home has been prepared. The new owner is submitting this application to complete the Stream Margin Review which is required before a building permit can be accepted by the City. 21 Lot 11 Callahan SMR Page 2 300 SO SPRING ST | 202 | ASPEN, CO 81611 970.925.2855 | BENDONADAMS.COM Background Lot 11 of the Callahan Subdivision was originally platted in 1976 with no connection to the Roaring Fork River. The map to the right is from the 1976 subdivision plat showing Lot 11 in yellow with no connection to the river. In 1982, the Second Amended Plat of the Callahan Subdivision was approved adding lands to the south of Lot 11. A portion of the added lands are within the Roaring Fork River. The map to the right is a snip of the 1982 amended plat highlighting the southern lands added to Lot 11. As part of the addition of the southern portion, there was an open space easement put in place affecting the southern half of the newly constituted Lot 11. The easement benefitted and burdened the owner of Lot 11. The easement was recently vacated. A “termination of declaration of protective covenants” was filed March 15, 2021, with the Pitkin County Clerk and Recorder (reception no. 674540). The southern half of the property is no longer limited to open space and can be developed. 22 Lot 11 Callahan SMR Page 3 300 SO SPRING ST | 202 | ASPEN, CO 81611 970.925.2855 | BENDONADAMS.COM The southern portion of the property is within the floodway, 100-year flood plain, and 500-year floodplain. Areas within the “floodway” will have moving water during a 100-year event. Areas within “Zone AE” will be inundated during a 100-year event. Areas within “Zone X” will be inundated during a 500-year event. The map to the right shows the three flood zones along the southern portion of the property. The property received Special Review and Stream Margin Review approval for the alternate top-of-slope. Planning and Zoning Commission Resolution No. 8, Series 2021, granted this approval (reception no. 678762). The Stream Margin Map was recorded September 27, 2021, as reception no. 680910. The map to the right is an exhibit to the P&Z Resolution No. 8, Series 2021. The map below is a snippet of the recorded map. Copies of the approval documents are attached to this application. 23 Lot 11 Callahan SMR Page 4 300 SO SPRING ST | 202 | ASPEN, CO 81611 970.925.2855 | BENDONADAMS.COM Pre-Development Grade A provision of the City’s Land Use Code allows the City to accept an estimate of “pre-development topography.” This is useful in areas where steep slopes exist on a site as the result of past human activities – for example a road cut or a pile of fill material. This process allows a property owner to not be “punished” by virtue of past site manipulation. The northern portions of this property have been manipulated to accommodate the development of Crystal Lake Road, a driveway for the property to the east, a bike path to the west, a primitive road into the property, and an emergency spillway for Crystal Lake. The prior activities created steep embankments. Rodney Kiser of True North Surveying has provided topographic analysis of the property along with 1-foot contours of an estimated pre-development condition. The map to the right highlights portions of the property affected by past development activity. Net Lot Area Based on the pre-development grade analysis, a slope analysis has been provided of the property. After accounting for areas under water and various grades, the property has a Net Lot Area of 43,267 square feet. Net Lot Area Slope Categories % counted towards Net Lot Area Area Total 0% - 20% 100% 42,602 sf 42,602 sf 20% - 30% 50% 1,530sf 765 sf 30% + 0% 166 sf 0 Under high water mark 0% 3,808sf 0 Net Lot Area = 43,367 sf 24 Lot 11 Callahan SMR Page 5 300 SO SPRING ST | 202 | ASPEN, CO 81611 970.925.2855 | BENDONADAMS.COM Floor Area Allowable Floor Area is calculated using the property’s net lot area as listed for the R-15 Zone District. Floor Area for this property is 6,202 square feet. Proposed Design The proposed design has been developed by Olson Kundig Architects, Design Workshop Landscape Architects, and SGM Engineering. Please see the attached exhibits for full plans. Several site sections have been provided along with 3-D diagrams to demonstrate compliance with the progressive height limit from the top-of- slope and the 25-foot limit of the R-15 Zone District. The project complies with the City’s Residential Design Standards as demonstrated in the attached RDS checklist. The vertical separation between Crystal Lake Road and the level of the property obviates a few of the standards. The 10-foot-plus separation is demonstrated on the current property survey, attached to this application. The driveway has been designed to accommodate required turning radii, emergency access, and the City’s slope limitations specified in section 4.1.4 of the City Engineering Standards. Maximum driveway slope is 10.5% with a 2% slope at the point the driveway connects to Crystal Lake Road. A condition of the Planning and Zoning Commission approval required a wetland delineation. This work has been completed and a report from SGM Engineering is attached to this application. Floor Area Net Lot Area category Single Family 15,000 – 50,000 4,500 square feet of floor area, plus 6 square feet of floor area for each additional 100 square feet in Net Lot Area up to a maximum of 6,600 square feet (28,367/100) x 6) = 1,702 Allowable FA = 6,202 sf 25 Lot 11 Callahan SMR Page 6 300 SO SPRING ST | 202 | ASPEN, CO 81611 970.925.2855 | BENDONADAMS.COM All development within 15 feet of the top-of-slope is limited to at- grade improvements and native species plantings. An exterior lighting plan from O- LLC is provided. All lights are downcast and compliant with City of Aspen lighting limitations. All plans submitted should be considered conceptual in nature and indicative of design intent. The plans illustrate compliance with the R-15 Zone District but are not meant to limit the property owner’s rights further than specified in the Land Use Code allowances in effect on the date of this submission. Applicant reserves the right to adjust interior plans, exterior materials, location and extent of fenestration, heights, parking layouts, landscape, and floor area, as long as such changes are in compliance with the R-15 Zone District, applicable provisions of the Stream Margin Review requirements, and applicable City regulations. This application responds to the Stream Margin Review criteria and the City’s Residential Design Standards. Responses to each review criterion are attached to this application as Exhibit 1 and an RDS checklist is attached as Exhibit 2. We believe this application contains the necessary information for a complete and competent review. Please let us know if additional information is needed. We look forward to your review and will make ourselves available for any questions or concerns you have. We can also arrange a site visit at your request. Kind Regards, Chris Bendon, AICP BendonAdams LLC 26 Lot 11 Callahan SMR Page 7 300 SO SPRING ST | 202 | ASPEN, CO 81611 970.925.2855 | BENDONADAMS.COM Exhibits: A 1. Review Criteria Responses 2. RDS Checklist 3. Wetland Delineation Report 4. Engineering Report 5. Site Improvement Survey 6. Pre-Development Grade Analysis 7. Civil Plans 8. Landscape Plans 9. Architecture Plans 10. Lighting Plans 11. Site Photos 12. Vicinity Map B 1. Application Form 2. A8Authorization Letter 3. Statement of Authority - 680700 4. Proof of Ownership 5. HOA Form 6. Agreement to Pay 7. Pre-application Conference Summary C 1. P&Z Resolution No. 8-2021 – 678762 2. Approved Stream Margin Map – 680910 27 Exhibit 1 Review Criteria 26.435.040.C Stream Margin Review standards. No development shall be permitted within the stream margin of the Roaring Fork River unless the Community Development Director makes a determination that the proposed development complies with all requirements set forth below: 1. It can be demonstrated that any proposed development which is in the Special Flood Hazard Area will not increase the base flood elevation on the parcel proposed for development. This shall be demonstrated by an engineering study prepared by a professional engineer registered to practice in the State which shows that the base flood elevation will not be raised, including, but not limited to, proposing mitigation techniques on or off-site which compensate for any base flood elevation increase caused by the development; and Response: No development will occur in the Special Flood Hazard Area and the base flood elevation will not be affected. This was demonstrated by the applicant and accepted by the City during the initial phase of Stream Margin Review on this property. 2. The adopted regulatory plans of the Open Space and Trails Board and the Roaring Fork River Greenway Plan are implemented in the proposed plan for development, to the greatest extent practicable. Areas of historic public use or access shall be dedicated via a recorded easement for public use. A fisherman's easement granting public fishing access within the high-water boundaries of the river course shall be granted via a recorded "Fisherman's Easement;" and Response: The Open Space and Trails Board does not have any adopted regulatory plans that affect this parcel. The Roaring Fork Greenway Plan does not appear to be effective or applicable. This plan is not referenced in the City of Aspen Municipal Code or the 2012 Aspen Area Community Plan. A search of City ordinances reflects that this plan was not adopted as a regulatory document and the plan does not appear on the City’s website. City staff have not been able to locate a copy of this plan. If a copy of the plan is located, the applicant will review regulatory aspects for applicability to this property. This response to this criterion was reviewed and accepted by the City during the initial phase of Stream Margin Review on this property. 3. There is no vegetation removed or damaged or slope grade changes (cut or fill) made outside of a specifically defined building envelope. A building envelope shall be designated by this review and said envelope shall be designated by this review and said envelope shall be recorded on a plat pursuant to Subsection 26.435.040(f)(1); and 28 Response: A building envelope was established during the initial phase of Stream Margin Review on this property and a map was recorded. The landscape plans and civil engineering plans associated with the specific design do not infringe on areas outside of the building envelope. 4. The proposed development does not pollute or interfere with the natural changes of the river, stream or other tributary, including erosion and/or sedimentation during construction. Increased on-site drainage shall be accommodated within the parcel to prevent entry into the river or onto its banks. Pools or hot tubs cannot be drained outside of the designated building envelope; and Response: Appropriate erosion control, sedimentation, and construction management practices will be used to protect the Roaring Fork River. All drainage from the building and hardscape areas will be directed to on-site stormwater infiltration and not directed towards the river. 5. Written notice is given to the Colorado Water Conservation Board prior to any alteration or relocation of a water course and a copy of said notice is submitted to the Federal Emergency Management Agency; and Response: Alteration of the water course is not proposed and is not anticipated to become an issue with actual construction. Notice will be provided if this changes. 6. A guarantee is provided in the event a water course is altered or relocated, that applies to the developer and his heirs, successors and assigns that ensures that the flood carrying capacity on the parcel is not diminished; and Response: Alteration of the water course is not proposed and is not anticipated to become an issue with actual construction. 7. Copies are provided of all necessary federal and state permits relating to work within the 100-year flood plain; and Response: No work is proposed within the 100-year floodplain. If work in the future is proposed, all Federal and State permits will be obtained. 8. There is no development other than approved native vegetation planting taking place below the top of slope or within fifteen (15) feet of the top of slope or the high waterline, whichever is most restrictive. This is an effort to protect the existing riparian vegetation and bank stability. New plantings (including trees, shrubs, flowers and grasses) outside of the 29 designated building envelope on the river side shall be native riparian vegetation as approved by the City. A landscape plan will be submitted with all development applications. The top of slope and 100-year flood plain elevation of the Roaring Fork River shall be determined by the Stream Margin Map located in the Community Development Department and filed at the City Engineering Department; and Response: The proposed design is pulled back from the top-of-slope and 15- foot setback requirement. Proposed improvements downslope of the 15-foot setback consist of at-grade landscape. All plantings proposed are native. A snippet of the landscape plan is shown below. Please see attached landscape plans for more detail. 9. All development outside the fifteen (15) foot setback from the top of slope does not exceed a height delineated by a line drawn at a forty-five (45) degree angle from ground level at the top of slope. Height shall be measured and determined by the Community Development Director using the definition for height set forth at Section 26.04.100 and method of calculating height set forth at Section 26.575.020 as shown in Figure "A"; and Response: The proposed design is compliant with the zone district height limitation and the progressive height limit from the top-of-slope. The top-of-slope varies across the property. Therefore, several sections and 3-D graphics of the proposed architecture have been provided. Additional sections and/or 3-D analysis can be provided upon request. A snippet of the architectural plan is shown below. Please see attached architectural plans for more detail. 30 10. All exterior lighting is low and downcast with no light(s) directed toward the river or located down the slope and shall be in compliance with Section 26.575.150. A lighting plan will be submitted with all development applications; and Response: A lighting plan prepared by a professional lighting designer O-LLC, in coordination with Olson Kundig and Design Workshop, is attached to this application. All site lighting is low and downcast in compliance with Section 26.575.150. Riverside lighting is not directed towards the river. The lighting plan includes specific manufacturer specifications. The applicant may need to switch manufacturers or exact specifications (for pricing, availability, or other factors). Alternate lighting will be substantially similar and compliant with City requirements in effect on the date of this submission. Please see attached lighting plan. 11. There has been accurate identification of wetlands and riparian zones. Response: Attached to this application is a wetland delineation report prepared by SGM Engineering. The report provides greater detail on species and soil conditions. The report does not recommend changing the top-of-slope determination previously made. 31 Residential Design Standards Administrative Compliance Review Applicant Checklist Standard Complies Alternative Compliance N/A Sheet #(s)/Notes B.1.Articulation of Building Mass (Non-flexible) B.2.Building Orientation (Flexible) B.3.Build-to Requirement (Flexible) B.4.One Story Element (Flexible) C.1.Garage Access (Non-flexible) C.2.Garage Placement (Non-flexible) C.3.Garage Dimensions (Flexible) Instructions: Please fill out the checklist below, marking whether the proposed design complies with the applicable standard as written or is requesting Alternative Compliance (only permitted for Flexible standards). Also include the sheet #(s) demonstrating the applicable standard. If a standard does not apply, please mark N/A and include in the Notes section why it does not apply. If Alternative Compliance is requested for a Flexible standard, include in the Notes section how the proposed design meets the intent of the standard(s). Additional sheets/graphics may be attached. Disclaimer: This application is only valid for the attached design. If any element of the design subject to Residential Design Standards changes prior to or during building permit review, the applicant shall be required to apply for a new Administrative Compliance Review. Address: Parcel ID: Zone District/PD: Representative: Email: Phone: Page 1 of 2 Exhibit A2 32 Standard Complies Alternative Compliance N/A Sheet #(s)/Notes C.4.Garage Door Design (Flexible) D.1.Entry Connection (Non-flexible) D.2.Door Height (Flexible) D.3.Entry Porch (Flexible) E.1.Principle Window (Flexible) E.2.Window Placement (Flexible) E.3.Nonorthogonal Window Limit (Flexible) E.4.Lightwell/Stairwell Location (Flexible) E.5.Materials (Flexible) Residential Design Standards Administrative Compliance Review Applicant Checklist Disclaimer: This application is only valid for the attached design. If any element of the design subject to Residential Design Standards changes prior to or during building permit review, the applicant shall be required to apply for a new Administrative Compliance Review. Page 2 of 2 33 Prepared for: BendonAdams 300 South Spring Street #202 Aspen, CO 81611 Prepared by: SGM, Inc. 259 Grand Avenue, Suite 200 Grand Junction, CO 81501 2021-190.001 September 21, 2022 www.sgm-inc.com Aquatic Resources Delineation Report Lot 11, Crystal Lake Drive Pitkin County, Colorado Exhibit A3 34 Wetland Delineation Report Lot 11 – Crystal Lake Drive September 2022 ii Table of Contents 1. PROJECT DESCRIPTION ................................................................................................................................. 3 2. PROJECT AREA DESCRIPTION ....................................................................................................................... 3 Landowner Contact Information ......................................................................................................... 4 3. WETLAND & WATERS DELINEATION ............................................................................................................ 7 Description of Desktop Review and Preliminary Area Evaluation ....................................................... 7 Site Hydrology ................................................................................................................................... 10 Results within Investigation Area ...................................................................................................... 10 Roaring Fork River (R3UBH) ................................................................................................ 10 Palustrine Emergent Wetlands (PEM) ................................................................................ 10 Palustrine Scrub-Shrub Wetlands (PSS) .............................................................................. 10 4. REFERENCES ............................................................................................................................................... 13 List of Figures Figure 1: Project Location ................................................................................................................................. 5 Figure 2: Topographic Map ............................................................................................................................... 6 Figure 3: National Wetland Indicator Map ....................................................................................................... 8 Figure 4: SSURGO Soils Map ............................................................................................................................. 9 Figure 5: Delineated Aquatic Resources ......................................................................................................... 12 List of Tables Table 1. Summary of Waters of the U.S. and Wetlands and Nexus in Investigation Area ............................ 11 List of Appendices APPENDIX A: WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORMS ................................................................................ 14 35 Wetland Delineation Report Lot 11 – Crystal Lake Drive September 2022 3 1. PROJECT DESCRIPTION To determine regulatory authority over the aquatic resources located on Lot 11 of the Callahan Subdivision, in Pitkin County, Colorado (parcel ID (Figure 1), a delineation of wetlands and Waters of the US (WoUS) was conducted in accordance with the USACE 1987 Wetland Delineation Manual and the Western Mountains regional supplement. The site assessment included the entire parcel, and adjacent lands to show wetland and water trajectories (the “Investigation Area”). There is approximately 0.09 acres of non-wetland WoUS within the subject parcel (associated with the Ordinary High Water Mark [OHWM] of the Roaring Fork River), and a total of 0.23 acres of jurisdictional wetlands. Wetland hydrology is derived from waters in the Roaring Fork, but also shallow ground waters associated with the geomorphology of the parcel. 2. PROJECT AREA DESCRIPTION The Investigation Area is located on the northern banks of the Roaring Fork River. The majority of the parcel is dominated by cobble likely derived from coarse alluvium derived from metamorphic rock. Upland vegetation is comprised of aspen woodlands, upland shrubs, grasses and forbs. At the southeastern end of the parcel the alluvium drops down into lower areas dominated by sedges and willows, with abundant evidence of saturation from groundwater sources. At the very southern end of the parcel the topography drops again, down to the Roaring Fork River. Wetlands are dominated by beaked sedge (Carex utriculata), water sedge (C. aquatilis), Nebraska sedge (C. nebrascensis), arctic rush (Juncus arcticus), mountain willow (Salix monticola) and Drummond’s willow (S. drummondiana). Other species were observed in lower quantities (see Appendix A). Using data from the nearest weather station (Aspen), recorded temperatures for the reporting period (1899 to 1979) range from an average low of 6 degrees Fahrenheit (˚F) in January to an average high of 79˚F in July. Average annual precipitation of 19.31 inches consists primarily of springtime rain and snow, and summertime thunderstorms (Western Regional Climate Center [WRCC] 2022). Upland conditions Wetland conditions 36 Wetland Delineation Report Lot 11 – Crystal Lake Drive September 2022 4 Landowner Contact Information This assessment covers the following parcels. Parcel(s) Owner Parcel IDs Parcel Physical Addresses North Clove N V 1333 South Miami Ave. #100 Miami, FL 33130 273718132011 TBD 37 Wetland Delineation Report Lot 11 – Crystal Lake Drive September 2022 5 Figure 1: Project Location 38 Wetland Delineation Report Lot 11 – Crystal Lake Drive September 2022 6 Figure 2: Topographic Map 39 Wetland Delineation Report Lot 11 – Crystal Lake Drive September 2022 7 3. WETLAND & WATERS DELINEATION SGM delineated all potential jurisdictional wetlands and WoUS in the Investigation Area on September 8, 2022 by SGM’s Senior Ecologist Eric Petterson, a certified wetland delineator. The wetlands and waters investigations were conducted using the Routine Determination Method set forth in the USACE Wetland Delineation Manual (USACE 1987); the Regional Supplement to the Corps of Engineers Wetland Delineation Manual: Western Mountains, Valleys, and Coast Region (Version 2.0; USACE 2010); and the guidance document “Information Needed for Jurisdictional Determinations - US Army Corps of Engineers.” Description of Desktop Review and Preliminary Area Evaluation SGM obtained and reviewed maps, aerial photos, and soil map unit descriptions of the project area. Upon completion of the pre-field work, the investigation area was traversed on foot. All WoUS and potential wetland areas were evaluated within the parcel at the time of the investigation. The goal was to evaluate all WoUS and wetlands that could be affected by development. SGM reviewed the National Wetlands Inventory (NWI) which indicated the presence of one wetland/waters types within the Investigation Area, which is associated with the Roaring Fork River: • R3UBH (Riverine, Upper Perennial, Unconsolidated Bottom, Permanently Flooded) o This feature is associated with the perennial channel of Surface Creek. The type and extent of the riverine habitat was generally confirmed based on the field investigation, although the NWI did not call out the wetlands located on the parcel (which is common). See Figure 3: National Wetland Indicator Map, and Figure 4: Delineated Wetlands to compare NWI mapping to the field delineation. In evaluating potential wetlands, SGM (a) assessed vegetation, soil, and hydrologic characteristics to identify areas meeting the wetland identification criteria and (b) marked the wetland boundaries. The boundary of each wetland was mapped with sub-meter GPS where indicators of wetland vegetation, hydric soil, and wetland hydrology are present. Adjacent uplands are distinguished from wetlands by lack of soil saturation, lack of hydric soil indicators and/or the presence of upland plant species. Vegetation, soils, and hydrology data were recorded for sample plots established on both sides of the wetland boundary (Appendix A: Wetland Determination Data Forms). 40 Wetland Delineation Report Lot 11 – Crystal Lake Drive September 2022 8 Figure 3: National Wetland Indicator Map 41 Wetland Delineation Report Lot 11 – Crystal Lake Drive September 2022 9 Figure 4: SSURGO Soils Map 42 Wetland Delineation Report Lot 11 – Crystal Lake Drive September 2022 10 Site Hydrology Hydrology within the Investigation Area was associated with shallow groundwaters (seeps) on the eastern side of the parcel, and then with surface waters in the Roaring Fork River. Results within Investigation Area Delineations occurred on September 9, 2022, and wetland boundaries were clear and easily definable. A wetland delineation map (Figure 4) depicts the Investigation Area, the wetland boundaries, and the location of all aquatic resources noted during the survey. Two (2) Wetland Determination Data Form (WWDF) points were established during the survey to clarify and support the wetland boundary delineations, and the data forms are included in Appendix A. Roaring Fork River (R3UBH) The Roaring Fork River is typed by NWI as R3UBH (Riverine, Upper Perennial, Unconsolidated Bottom, Permanently Flooded), and site investigations confirm these characterizations. The river has a combination of good wetland fringes, and some areas with steep cutbanks (and no wetlands). The ordinary high water mark (OHWM) was delineated as the boundary for this non-wetland WoUS feature. Palustrine Emergent Wetlands (PEM) Vegetation: The majority of wetlands were determined to be Palustrine, Emergent wetlands (PEM). Vegetation is dominated by beaked sedge (Carex utriculata - OBL), water sedge (C. aquatilis - OBL), Nebraska sedge (C. nebrascensis - OBL), and arctic rush (Juncus arcticus - FACW). Soils: Soils are very dark, and had very high organic content consistent with histosols (A2), soils in the wetlands also had Hydrogen Sulfide (A4) odors. Soils are mapped by the NRCS as Mine loam, 12 to 25 percent slopes (non-hydric). Hydrology: At the time of the investigation, wetland areas were saturated with a dry season water table. Palustrine Scrub-Shrub Wetlands (PSS) Vegetation: These wetlands were dominated by mountain willow (Salix monticola - FACW) and Drummond’s willow (S. drummondiana - FACW), with a similar understory as PEM wetlands. 43 Wetland Delineation Report Lot 11 – Crystal Lake Drive September 2022 11 Soils: A soil pit was not dug in the PSS wetlands. Soils are mapped by the NRCS as Mine loam, 12 to 25 percent slopes (non-hydric). Hydrology: At the time of the investigation, wetland areas were saturated. The Roaring Fork River was running well and provided hydrology to adjacent wetlands. A number of seeps were observed on the banks, above the OHWM. Table 1. Summary of Waters of the U.S. and Wetlands and Nexus in Investigation Area Name Size (acres) Flow Frequency Flows to Proximity Wetlands PEM Wetlands 0.15 Perennial Roaring Fork River Adjacent & Abutting PSS Wetlands 0.08 Perennial Roaring Fork River Adjacent & Abutting Wetlands Total 0.23 acres Waters of the U.S. R3UBH (Roaring Fork River) 0.09 Perennial Colorado River Tributary Wetlands & WoUS Total 0.32 acres 44 Wetland Delineation Report Lot 11 – Crystal Lake Drive September 2022 12 Figure 5: Delineated Aquatic Resources 45 Wetland Delineation Report Lot 11 – Crystal Lake Drive September 2022 13 4. REFERENCES Lichvar, R.W., D.L. Banks, W.N. Kirchner, and N.C. Melvin. 2016. The National Wetland Plant List: 2016 wetland ratings; Mountain Valleys Regional Wetland Plant List. Phytoneuron 2016-30: 1-17. Published 28 April 2016. ISSN 2153 733X Natural Resource Conservation Service. 2017. National Resource Conservation Service (NRCS). 2018. Web Soil Survey. Available at: https://www.nrcs.usda.gov/wps/portal/nrcs/detail/soils/survey/?cid=nrcs142p2_053627 United States Army Corps of Engineers (USACE), Environmental Laboratory. 1987. Corps of Engineers Wetland Delineation Manual. Wetlands Research Program Technical Report Y-87-1. United States Army Corps of Engineers. 2010. Environmental Laboratory, Regional Supplement to the Corps of Engineers Wetland Delineation Manual: Western Mountains, Valleys, and Coast Region (V.2, ERDC/EL TR-10-3). US Army Engineer Research and Development Center. Vicksburg, MS. USACE. 2005. Regulatory Guidance Letter No. 05-05. Ordinary High Water Mark Identification. December 7, 2005. Western Regional Climate Center. 2022. Regional Climate Summaries. Available at: http://www.wrcc.dri.edu/. Accessed September 2022. 46 Wetland Delineation Report Lot 11 – Crystal Lake Drive September 2022 14 APPENDIX A: WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORMS 47 Wetland Delineation Report Lot 11 – Crystal Lake Drive September 2022 15 48 Wetland Delineation Report Lot 11 – Crystal Lake Drive September 2022 16 49 Wetland Delineation Report Lot 11 – Crystal Lake Drive September 2022 17 50 Wetland Delineation Report Lot 11 – Crystal Lake Drive September 2022 18 51 Wetland Delineation Report Lot 11 – Crystal Lake Drive September 2022 19 52 www.sgm-inc.com GLENWOOD SPRINGS 118 West Sixth St, Suite 200 | Glenwood Springs, CO 81601 | 970.945.1004 January 30, 2023 Chris Bendon www.bendonadams.com 300 So. Spring St. #202 Aspen, CO 81611 (o) 970.925.2855 RE: 1439 Crystal Lake Road, aka Lot 11 Callahan Subdiv, Pitco Parcel ID 273718132011 – Land Use Engineering Memorandum Dear Chris: This report addresses an overview of Civil Engineering aspects of a residential development of the above parcel. This site is an unoccupied parcel off of Crystal Lake road approximately 300 feet west of Highway 82. Occupied residential parcels are to the west and, across the street, to the north. Farther north is Crystal Lake itself, the outfall of which impact this parcel. To the east is another residential parcel that is in the County (the City limit is immediately adjacent to the east side of the parcel in question. To the south and cutting through the very southern end of the property is the Roaring Fork River. This report is to indicate the applicant’s approach to comply or, if circumstances warrant, vary from Pitkin County code sections 7-20-10 through 30 and the engineering elements of 7-30. At this point we see no reason for variance requests due to any site-engineering related issue. This assessment is for feasibility and to determine if there are any obvious hurdles, administratively or technically, from the development of this site for a new SFR. Driveway & Access The site is currently accessed via a dirt path off from the pedestrian trail from the adjacent Lot 13. This would not be continued, with a direct connection from Crystal Lake Road. Adding to this necessity is the fact that the overflow outfall pipe from Crystal Lake, an 18” pipe, empties into this parcel near the northwest corner, under the most ideal spot for driveway access. That pipe will need to extend, with supporting calculations, and assurances of the continued route of overflow to the south and into a catch basin. The overflow route would then be piped from the catch basin around the west side of the proposed building footprint and past the desired building area. That pipe is damaged and crushed and would need to be inspected before extension to determine the appropriate connection method. Ensuring this overflow is maintained and in good shape should be considered by the potential lot owner so debris does not inadvertently move or cause other damage to the drainage path through Lot 11. Exhibit A4 53 www.sgm-inc.com Page | 2 Grading & Drainage The existing overflow path from Crystal Lake goes through Lot 11, entering at the northwest corner, crossing and curving southward prior to the east property boundary. In order to properly convey the outflow volume, a pipe run of 54 feet to the south is required, the run would end at a catch basin where the flows would then enter another 18” pipe and extend 222 feet south along the west side of the building footprint where flows would then daylight and flow to the Roaring Fork River. Following, it is also reasonable that the existing flowpath for the outflow will be utilized to collect uphill runoff and will be convey south along the east side of the building footprint through vegetated swales prior to entering the Roaring Fork. The south end of the parcel, between the designated setbacks and floodplain areas, a shallow detention system will be needed to handle the site runoff due to the proximity to the creek. This system would be designed to satisfy the CoA URMP criteria. The south end of the parcel is impacted by the floodplain Zone X and AE and is shown on the and shown on the stream margin map. Slopes The vast majority of the site is at 30% or less slope. Some notable area at the north end of the parcel are steeper than 30% and would appear to have been associated with the lake outfall construction and associated access roads. To continue the outfall pipe around the likely home site would entail constructing and filling to some degree on that slope to cover the outfall pipe and protect the house. Water and Sewer Water and Sewer existing in the Crystal Lake ROW and would appear to be accessible through typical construction methods. It is possible some or all of a proposed house would need an ejector pump for sewer, but that is not an uncommon circumstance with readily available appurtenances for internal plumbing. A fire hydrant is to the northeast of this parcel, across the road. Electric, Phone, Communications Power and communications are along the north side of CLR and appear to be accessible for typical service needs. Gas Gas is available along the south side of CLR and appears accessible near the trailhead. River and Stream Corridors and Wetlands– provided by Eric Petterson 54 www.sgm-inc.com Page | 3 The parcel is somewhat constrained by a top-of-slope and 15-foot setback from the top-of-bank of the Roaring Fork River, as well as wetlands. On February 23, 2021, SGM environmental staff delineated the top of bank of the river. The top of bank was delineated based on topographic benching, indicating of high flow events, as well as a wrack-line (which consisted of entrained vegetation in willows, which is also indicative of high-flow events). The map recorded at reception no. 680910 shows the top-of-slope as well as the city-approved 15-foot setback. Wetlands are extensive at the southern and eastern sides of the parcel. SGM prepared an Aquatic Resources Delineation Report in late 2022, prior to the current snow cover. The analysis comports with the prior top- of-slope mapping and is consistent with the City’s river protection standards. Traffic Impact The typical single-family residential uses are not anticipated to change traffic loading along CLR. We would recommend landscaping be kept below typical vehicular visibility levels at the driveway as the pedestrian trail is to the immediate west of the site. Conclusion We trust this report is sufficient for the applicant’s review of feasibility on the parcel. There is no obvious reason or significant difficulty in developing this site. Please feel free to contact us if we may provide further information or clarification. Very Truly Yours, Rick L Barth, P.E., Senior Engineer Civil Services Sector SGM Attachments / Associated reports: Top of bank 55 500 8021.620 LS9184 5088021.620 LS9184 E E S SDYH G FOUND MAG NAIL & ALUMINUM TAG NO IDENTIFICATION IN PAVEMENT SET MAG NAIL & 1-1/2"ALUMINUM TAG TNC PLS38215 IN PAVEMENT SITE BENCH MARK SET REBAR & 1-1/4" ORANGE PLASTIC CAP TNC PLS38215 ELEVATION: 8014.92 FOUND NO. 5 REBAR & 1-1/4" YELLOW PLASTIC CAP TRI-CO LS12707 65.5' WITNESS CORNER FOUND NO. 5 REBAR & 1-1/4" YELLOW PLASTIC CAP ALPINE LS9184 53.7' WITNESS CORNER FOUND NO. 5 REBAR & 1-1/4" YELLOW PLASTIC CAP ALPINE LS9184 FOUND NO. 5 REBAR & 1-1/4" YELLOW PLASTIC CAP TRI-CO LS12707 FOUND NO. 6 REBAR & 3-1/4" ALUMINUM CAP STAMPED MS890/MS612 BLM 1954 (COR. 1 RIVERSIDE PLACER MS NO. 3905) FOUND NO. 6 REBAR & 3-1/4" ALUMINUM CAP STAMPED MS6120 COR 2 BLM 1954 3.0' BETWEEN CAPSCONCRETESTONE RETAINING WALL EDGE OF GRAVEL EDGE OF GRAVEL PAVED PEDESTRIAN PATH PAVED ROADWAY CRYSTAL LAKE OVERFLOW OUTLET PIPE PER PLAT BOOK 6 AT PAGE 18 FL O W L I N E L=89.75' R=375.00' CB=N84°45'04"E CH=89.55' L=21.21' R=375.00' CB=N79°36'36"E CH=21.21'(BASIS OF BEARINGS)S00°14'00"W 456.89'PLAT=457.24'229.76'227.13'S89°03'26"W 70.00' PLAT=N89°46'00"WN31°54 '08 "W 74 .69 'PLAT=N32°27 '17 "W 74 .05 'PLAT=N00°14'00"EN00°11'30'E 382.62'103.54'213.74'ROARING FORKRIVERWAT E R S E D G E JUL Y 2 0 2 0 LOT 11 1.104± ACRES 48,106± SQ.FT. LOT 13 OWNER ASPEN CLUB LOT 12 OWNER CG CRYSTAL LAKES HOLINGS LLC LOT 5 STILLWATER RANCH OWNER JOHN BURGESS LOT 6 STILLWATER RANCH OWNER GERSON TRUSTN15°17'23"W 965.17'(TIE)S85°34'02"E 1174.12 ' ( T I E ) CITY OF ASPEN 2009 GPS MONUMENT #18 CITY OF ASPEN 2009 GPS MONUMENT #19 FL O O D Z O N E A E FL O O D W A Y FL O O D Z O N E A E FL O O D Z O N E A E FL O O D Z O N E X FLOOD ZONE AE BASED FLOOD ELEVATION 7993 FLOO D Z O N E X FLOOD ZONE AE AREA WITHIN FLOODWAY SPECIAL FLOOD ZONE X AREA OF 0.2% ANNUAL CHANCE OF FLOOD GRAVEL TURNOUT 8 0 2 0 8 0 1 58020 8 0 1 5 8 0 1 0 80 0 5 8005 800080 0 4 8000 799579908002800580108015 80121 23 4 6 5 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 25 30 24 26 27 29 28 33 38 36 35 37 34 31 32 39 40 41 42 43 4445 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 54 53 55 56 5758 59 60 61 62 63 64 6566 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124125 126 CRYSTAL LAKE ROAD (24' PRIVATE R I G H T - O F - W A Y ) 5' WIDE UTILITY EASEMENT PLAT BOOK 5 PAGE 7 5' WIDE UTILITY EASEMENT PLAT BOOK 5 PAGE 7 5' WIDE UTILITY EASEMENT PLAT BOOK 5 PAGE 7 10' REAR SETBACK 5' ACCESSORY BUILDING SETBACK10' SIDE SETBACK10' SIDE SETBACK30' ACCESSORY SETBACK 25' SETBACK REAR YARD SETBACK LINE (EFFECTIVELY SUPERSEDED BY OPEN SPACE BOUNDARY AND STREAM MARGIN SETBACK LINES AS APPLICABLE 10' WIDE UTILITY EASEMENT PLAT BOOK 13 PAGE 92 10' WIDE UTILITY EASEMENT PLAT BOOK 13 PAGE 92 10' WIDE UTILITY EASEMENT PLAT BOOK 13 PAGE 92 TOP O F S L O P E RECE P T I O N N O. 6 8 0 9 1 0 WATER LINE SEWER LINE TELEPHONE LINE GAS LINE UNDERGROUND ELECTRIC LINE TELEPHONE PEDESTAL DYH S FIRE HYDRANT SANITARY MANHOLE ELECTRICAL TRANSFORMER ELECTRICAL METER LEGEND E WATER VALVE BOX VICINITY MAP SURVEYOR 'S CERTIFICATION SURVEY NOTES: LOT 11 - CALLAHAN SUBDIVISION SECTION 18, TOWNSHIP 10 SOUTH, RANGE 84 WEST OF THE 6TH PM COUNTY OF PITKIN, STATE OF COLORADO IMPROVEMENT & TOPOGRAPHIC SURVEY TRUE NORTH COLORADO LLC. A LAND SURVEYING AND MAPPING COMPANY P.O. BOX 614 - 386 MAIN STREET UNIT 3 NEW CASTLE, COLORADO 81647 (970) 984-0474 www.truenorthcolorado.com PROJECT NO: 2020-240 DATE: December 15, 2022 DRAWN RPK SURVEYED DJB SHEET 1 OF 1 TRUENORTH A LAND SURVEYING AND MAPPING COMPANY 20' 10'40' SCALE: 1" = 20' N FURNISHED PROPERTY DESCRIPTION: 0 TREE TYPE SIZE DRIP TREE CHART NOTICE: ACCORDING TO COLORADO LAW YOU MUST COMMENCE ANY LEGAL ACTION BASED UPON ANY DEFECT IN THIS SURVEY WITHIN THREE YEARS AFTER YOU FIRST DISCOVER SUCH DEFECT. IN NO EVENT MAY ANY ACTION BASED UPON ANY DEFECT IN THIS SURVEY BE COMMENCED MORE THAN TEN YEARS FROM THE DATE OF CERTIFICATION SHOWN HEREON. 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 ASPEN ASPEN ASPEN ASPEN ASPEN ASPEN ASPEN ASPEN ASPEN ASPEN ASPEN ASPEN ASPENASPEN ASPEN 20' 18' 20' 18' 16' 16' 16' 22' 20' 16' 18' 16' 18' 16' 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 ASPEN ASPEN ASPEN ASPEN ASPEN ASPEN ASPEN ASPEN ASPEN ASPEN ASPEN ASPEN ASPEN ASPEN ASPEN ASPEN ASPEN ASPEN ASPEN ASPEN ASPEN ASPEN ASPEN ASPEN ASPENASPEN ASPEN 16' 22' 18' 20' 16' 16' 14' 20' 28' 16' 28' 28' 20' 14' 22' 32' 16' 20' 30' 24' 26' 16' 14' 14' 14' 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 ASPEN ASPEN ASPEN ASPEN ASPEN ASPEN CONIFEROUS ASPEN ASPEN CONIFEROUS CONIFEROUS CONIFERUOS CONIFEROUS ASPEN ASPEN ASPEN ASPEN ASPEN ASPEN ASPEN ASPEN ASPEN ASPEN ASPEN ASPENASPEN ASPEN 16' 30' 18' 18' 14' 10' 22' 18' 12' 12' 12' 10' 30' 36' 28' 26' 26' 24' 18' 32' 28' 20' 30' 20' 34' 6" 5" 5" 4" 4" 4" 6" 6" 4" 5" 4" 5" 4" 4" 7" 7" 5" 4" 5" 5" 5/4" 9" 5" 8" 8" 6" 6" 8" 5" 7" 9" 6" 8" 4" 4" 4" 5" 4" 4" 7/4" 5" 5" 4" 5" 9" 5" 11" 4" 5" 5" 4" 10" 9" 9" 8" 7" 4" 8" 9" 6" 8" 5" 11" TREE TYPE SIZE DRIP TREE CHART 1 2 10" 18' 6" 20' CONIFEROUS 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 ASPEN 6/4" 20'ASPEN 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 ASPEN ASPEN ASPEN ASPEN ASPEN ASPEN ASPEN ASPEN ASPEN ASPEN ASPEN ASPEN ASPEN ASPEN ASPEN ASPEN ASPEN ASPEN ASPEN ASPEN ASPEN ASPEN ASPEN ASPEN ASPEN ASPEN ASPEN ASPEN ASPEN ASPEN ASPEN ASPEN ASPEN ASPEN ASPEN ASPEN ASPEN ASPEN ASPEN ASPEN ASPEN ASPEN ASPEN ASPEN ASPEN ASPEN ASPEN ASPEN ASPEN ASPEN ASPEN ASPEN ASPEN ASPEN ASPEN ASPEN ASPEN ASPEN ASPEN ASPEN 16' 20' 16' 18' 20' 24' 24' 22' 26' 24' 20' 28' 22' 28' 26' 16' 24' 30' 26' 20'20' 24' 16' 16' 18' 32' 24' 22' 30' 30' 28' 20' 20' 26' 24' 20' 20' 20'30' 24' 24' 20' 24' 16' 16' 28' 20' 24' 16' 28' 30' 16' 30' 16' 22' 20' 26' 28' 28' 26' 16' 26' 6" 7" 5" 6" 7" 10" 8" 7" 8" 6" 5" 9" 7" 7" 7" 4" 8" 9" 8" 6" 7" 4" 4" 6" 8" 5" 5" 10" 9" 8" 5" 5" 7" 6" 5" 5" 9" 6" 6" 5" 6" 4" 4" 7" 5" 6" 4" 9" 9" 4" 9" 4" 7" 7" 9" 8" 9" 7" 4" 8" SLOPE LEGEND 0% TO 20% (36,939± SQ.FT.) (EXCLUDES AREA BELOW HIGH WATER LINE) (3,808± SQ.FT.) 20% TO 30% (2,630± SQ.FT.) 30% & GREATER (4,729± SQ.FT.) SCALE: 1" = 800'HIGHWAY NO . 82 CRYSTAL LAKE ROAD WESTVIEW DRIVE LUPINE DR IVE CITY OF ASPEN ROARI N G F ORK RIVERPROPERTY ZONING MODERATE-DENSITY RESIDENTIAL (R-15) CITY OF ASPEN LAND USE CODE: 26.710.050 SETBACKS: FRONT YARD: A. RESDIENTIAL DWELLINGS: 25 FEET B. ACCESSORY BUILDINGS AND ALL OTHER BUILDINGS: 30 FEET SIDE YARD: 10 FEET REAR YARD: A. PRINCIPAL BUILDING: 10 FEET B. ACCESSORY BUILDINGS: 5 FEET MAXIMUM HEIGHT: 25 FEET Exhibit A5 56 S SDYH FOUND MAG NAIL & ALUMINUM TAG NO IDENTIFICATION IN PAVEMENT SET MAG NAIL & 1-1/2"ALUMINUM TAG TNC PLS38215 IN PAVEMENT SITE BENCH MARK SET REBAR & 1-1/4" ORANGE PLASTIC CAP TNC PLS38215 ELEVATION: 8014.92 FOUND NO. 5 REBAR & 1-1/4" YELLOW PLASTIC CAP TRI-CO LS12707 65.5' WITNESS CORNER FOUND NO. 5 REBAR & 1-1/4" YELLOW PLASTIC CAP ALPINE LS9184 53.7' WITNESS CORNER FOUND NO. 5 REBAR & 1-1/4" YELLOW PLASTIC CAP ALPINE LS9184 FOUND NO. 5 REBAR & 1-1/4" YELLOW PLASTIC CAP TRI-CO LS12707 FOUND NO. 6 REBAR & 3-1/4" ALUMINUM CAP STAMPED MS890/MS612 BLM 1954 (COR. 1 RIVERSIDE PLACER MS NO. 3905) FOUND NO. 6 REBAR & 3-1/4" ALUMINUM CAP STAMPED MS6120 COR 2 BLM 1954 3.0' BETWEEN CAPSCONCRETESTONE RETAINING WALL EDGE OF GRAVEL EDGE OF GRAVEL PAVED PEDESTRIAN PATH PAVED ROADWAY CRYSTAL LAKE OVERFLOW OUTLET PIPE PER PLAT BOOK 6 AT PAGE 18 FL O W L I N E L=89.75' R=375.00' CB=N84°45'04"E CH=89.55' L=21.21' R=375.00' CB=N79°36'36"E CH=21.21'(BASIS OF BEARINGS)S00°14'00"W 456.89'PLAT=457.24'229.76'227.13'S89°03'26"W 70.00' PLAT=N89°46'00"WN31°54 '08 "W 74 .69 'PLAT=N32°27 '17 "W 74 .05 'PLAT=N00°14'00"EN00°11'30'E 382.62'103.54'213.74'ROARING FORKRIVERWAT E R S E D G E JUL Y 2 0 2 0 LOT 11 1.104± ACRES 48,106± SQ.FT. LOT 13 OWNER ASPEN CLUB LOT 12 OWNER CG CRYSTAL LAKES HOLINGS LLC LOT 5 STILLWATER RANCH OWNER JOHN BURGESS LOT 6 STILLWATER RANCH OWNER GERSON TRUSTN15°17'23"W 965.17'(TIE)S85°34'02"E 1174.12 ' ( T I E ) CITY OF ASPEN 2009 GPS MONUMENT #18 CITY OF ASPEN 2009 GPS MONUMENT #19 FL O O D Z O N E A E FL O O D W A Y FL O O D Z O N E A E FL O O D Z O N E A E FL O O D Z O N E X FLOOD ZONE AE BASED FLOOD ELEVATION 7993 FLOO D Z O N E X FLOOD ZONE AE AREA WITHIN FLOODWAY SPECIAL FLOOD ZONE X AREA OF 0.2% ANNUAL CHANCE OF FLOOD GRAVEL TURNOUT CRYSTAL LAKE ROAD (24' PRIVATE R I G H T - O F - W A Y ) 5' WIDE UTILITY EASEMENT PLAT BOOK 5 PAGE 7 5' WIDE UTILITY EASEMENT PLAT BOOK 5 PAGE 7 5' WIDE UTILITY EASEMENT PLAT BOOK 5 PAGE 7 10' REAR SETBACK 5' ACCESSORY BUILDING SETBACK10' SIDE SETBACK10' SIDE SETBACK30' ACCESSORY SETBACK 25' SETBACK REAR YARD SETBACK LINE (EFFECTIVELY SUPERSEDED BY OPEN SPACE BOUNDARY AND STREAM MARGIN SETBACK LINES AS APPLICABLE 10' WIDE UTILITY EASEMENT PLAT BOOK 13 PAGE 92 10' WIDE UTILITY EASEMENT PLAT BOOK 13 PAGE 92 10' WIDE UTILITY EASEMENT PLAT BOOK 13 PAGE 92 TOP O F S L O P E RECE P T I O N N O. 6 8 0 9 1 0 800 6 800 7 80098010 8008 8005 8004 80038004 800 2 800 1 8 0 0 0 7 9 9 9 7 9 9 8 80 0 1 800280018000 7999 79987997799679957994 7993 7992 7991 7990 79907989799 1 VICINITY MAP LOT 11 - CALLAHAN SUBDIVISION SECTION 18, TOWNSHIP 10 SOUTH, RANGE 84 WEST OF THE 6TH PM COUNTY OF PITKIN, STATE OF COLORADO HISTORIC TOPOGRAPHIC MAP TRUE NORTH COLORADO LLC. A LAND SURVEYING AND MAPPING COMPANY P.O. BOX 614 - 386 MAIN STREET UNIT 3 NEW CASTLE, COLORADO 81647 (970) 984-0474 www.truenorthcolorado.com PROJECT NO: 2023-111 DATE: January 19, 2023 DRAWN RPK SURVEYED DJB SHEET 1 OF 1 TRUENORTH A LAND SURVEYING AND MAPPING COMPANY 20' 10'40' SCALE: 1" = 20' N PROPERTY DESCRIPTION: 0 NOTICE: ACCORDING TO COLORADO LAW YOU MUST COMMENCE ANY LEGAL ACTION BASED UPON ANY DEFECT IN THIS SURVEY WITHIN THREE YEARS AFTER YOU FIRST DISCOVER SUCH DEFECT. IN NO EVENT MAY ANY ACTION BASED UPON ANY DEFECT IN THIS SURVEY BE COMMENCED MORE THAN TEN YEARS FROM THE DATE OF CERTIFICATION SHOWN HEREON. SLOPE LEGEND 0% TO 20% (42,602± SQ.FT.) (EXCLUDES AREA BELOW HIGH WATER LINE) (3,808± SQ.FT.) 20% TO 30% (1,530± SQ.FT.) 30% & GREATER (166± SQ.FT.) SCALE: 1" = 800'HIGHWAY NO . 82 CRYSTAL LAKE ROAD WESTVIEW DRIVE LUPINE DR IVE CITY OF ASPEN ROARI N G F ORK RIVERNOTES: SURVEYOR 'S STATEMENT I, RODNEY P. KISER, DO HEREBY STATE THAT THIS HISTORIC TOPOGRAPHIC MAP WAS PREPARED BY TRUE NORTH COLORADO, LLC. FOR 1417 CRYSTAL LAKE LLC THAT THIS MAP WAS PREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY SUPERVISION AND RESPONSIBLE CHARGE AND THAT IT IS TRUE AND CORRECT TO THE BEST OF MY BELIEF AND KNOWLEDGE. SITE PREDEVELOPMENT Exhibit A6 57 S SDYH FOUND MAG NAIL & ALUMINUM TAG NO IDENTIFICATION IN PAVEMENT SET MAG NAIL & 1-1/2"ALUMINUM TAG TNC PLS38215 IN PAVEMENT SITE BENCH MARK SET REBAR & 1-1/4" ORANGE PLASTIC CAP TNC PLS38215 ELEVATION: 8014.92 FOUND NO. 5 REBAR & 1-1/4" YELLOW PLASTIC CAP TRI-CO LS12707 65.5' WITNESS CORNER FOUND NO. 5 REBAR & 1-1/4" YELLOW PLASTIC CAP ALPINE LS9184 53.7' WITNESS CORNER FOUND NO. 5 REBAR & 1-1/4" YELLOW PLASTIC CAP ALPINE LS9184 FOUND NO. 5 REBAR & 1-1/4" YELLOW PLASTIC CAP TRI-CO LS12707 FOUND NO. 6 REBAR & 3-1/4" ALUMINUM CAP STAMPED MS890/MS612 BLM 1954 (COR. 1 RIVERSIDE PLACER MS NO. 3905) FOUND NO. 6 REBAR & 3-1/4" ALUMINUM CAP STAMPED MS6120 COR 2 BLM 1954 3.0' BETWEEN CAPSCONCRETESTONE RETAINING WALL EDGE OF GRAVEL EDGE OF GRAVEL PAVED PEDESTRIAN PATH PAVED ROADWAY CRYSTAL LAKE OVERFLOW OUTLET PIPE PER PLAT BOOK 6 AT PAGE 18 FL O W L I N E L=89.75' R=375.00' CB=N84°45'04"E CH=89.55' L=21.21' R=375.00' CB=N79°36'36"E CH=21.21'(BASIS OF BEARINGS)S00°14'00"W 456.89'PLAT=457.24'229.76'227.13'S89°03'26"W 70.00' PLAT=N89°46'00"WN31°54 '08 "W 74 .69 'PLAT=N32°27 '17 "W 74 .05 'PLAT=N00°14'00"EN00°11'30'E 382.62'103.54'213.74'ROARING FORKRIVERWAT E R S E D G E JUL Y 2 0 2 0 LOT 11 1.104± ACRES 48,106± SQ.FT. LOT 13 OWNER ASPEN CLUB LOT 12 OWNER CG CRYSTAL LAKES HOLINGS LLC LOT 5 STILLWATER RANCH OWNER JOHN BURGESS LOT 6 STILLWATER RANCH OWNER GERSON TRUSTN15°17'23"W 965.17'(TIE)S85°34'02"E 1174.1 2 ' ( T I E ) CITY OF ASPEN 2009 GPS MONUMENT #18 CITY OF ASPEN 2009 GPS MONUMENT #19 FL O O D Z O N E A E FL O O D W A Y FL O O D Z O N E A E FL O O D Z O N E A E FL O O D Z O N E X FLOOD ZONE AE BASED FLOOD ELEVATION 7993 FLOO D Z O N E X FLOOD ZONE AE AREA WITHIN FLOODWAY SPECIAL FLOOD ZONE X AREA OF 0.2% ANNUAL CHANCE OF FLOOD GRAVEL TURNOUT CRYSTAL LAKE ROAD (24' PRIVATE RI G H T - O F - W A Y ) 5' WIDE UTILITY EASEMENT PLAT BOOK 5 PAGE 7 5' WIDE UTILITY EASEMENT PLAT BOOK 5 PAGE 7 5' WIDE UTILITY EASEMENT PLAT BOOK 5 PAGE 7 10' REAR SETBACK 5' ACCESSORY BUILDING SETBACK10' SIDE SETBACK10' SIDE SETBACK30' ACCESSORY SETBACK 25' SETBACK REAR YARD SETBACK LINE (EFFECTIVELY SUPERSEDED BY OPEN SPACE BOUNDARY AND STREAM MARGIN SETBACK LINES AS APPLICABLE 10' WIDE UTILITY EASEMENT PLAT BOOK 13 PAGE 92 10' WIDE UTILITY EASEMENT PLAT BOOK 13 PAGE 92 10' WIDE UTILITY EASEMENT PLAT BOOK 13 PAGE 92 TOP O F S L O P E RECE P T I O N N O. 6 8 0 9 1 0 800 6 800 7 80098010 8008 8005 8004 80038004 800 2 800 1 8 0 0 0 7 9 9 9 7 9 9 8 80 0 1 800280018000 7999 79987997799679957994 7993 7992 7991 7990 79907989799 1 AREA OF DISTURBANCE DEVELOPMENT OF CRYSTAL LAKE ROAD, PEDESTAL PATH, DRAINAGE OUTFALL, PIONEER DRIVEWAY, AND WESTERLY NEIGHBOR'S DRIVEWAY VICINITY MAP LOT 11 - CALLAHAN SUBDIVISION SECTION 18, TOWNSHIP 10 SOUTH, RANGE 84 WEST OF THE 6TH PM COUNTY OF PITKIN, STATE OF COLORADO HISTORIC TOPOGRAPHIC MAP TRUE NORTH COLORADO LLC. A LAND SURVEYING AND MAPPING COMPANY P.O. BOX 614 - 386 MAIN STREET UNIT 3 NEW CASTLE, COLORADO 81647 (970) 984-0474 www.truenorthcolorado.com PROJECT NO: 2023-111 DATE: January 19, 2023 DRAWN RPK SURVEYED DJB SHEET 1 OF 1 TRUENORTH A LAND SURVEYING AND MAPPING COMPANY 20' 10'40' SCALE: 1" = 20' N PROPERTY DESCRIPTION: 0 NOTICE: ACCORDING TO COLORADO LAW YOU MUST COMMENCE ANY LEGAL ACTION BASED UPON ANY DEFECT IN THIS SURVEY WITHIN THREE YEARS AFTER YOU FIRST DISCOVER SUCH DEFECT. IN NO EVENT MAY ANY ACTION BASED UPON ANY DEFECT IN THIS SURVEY BE COMMENCED MORE THAN TEN YEARS FROM THE DATE OF CERTIFICATION SHOWN HEREON. SCALE: 1" = 800'HIGHWAY NO . 82 CRYSTAL LAKE ROAD WESTVIEW DRIVE LUPINE DR IVE CITY OF ASPEN ROARI N G F ORK RIVERNOTES: SURVEYOR 'S STATEMENT I, RODNEY P. KISER, DO HEREBY STATE THAT THIS HISTORIC TOPOGRAPHIC MAP WAS PREPARED BY TRUE NORTH COLORADO, LLC. FOR 1417 CRYSTAL LAKE LLC THAT THIS MAP WAS PREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY SUPERVISION AND RESPONSIBLE CHARGE AND THAT IT IS TRUE AND CORRECT TO THE BEST OF MY BELIEF AND KNOWLEDGE. SITE 58 S SDYH FOUND MAG NAIL & ALUMINUM TAG NO IDENTIFICATION IN PAVEMENT SET MAG NAIL & 1-1/2"ALUMINUM TAG TNC PLS38215 IN PAVEMENT SITE BENCH MARK SET REBAR & 1-1/4" ORANGE PLASTIC CAP TNC PLS38215 ELEVATION: 8014.92 FOUND NO. 5 REBAR & 1-1/4" YELLOW PLASTIC CAP TRI-CO LS12707 65.5' WITNESS CORNER FOUND NO. 5 REBAR & 1-1/4" YELLOW PLASTIC CAP ALPINE LS9184 53.7' WITNESS CORNER FOUND NO. 5 REBAR & 1-1/4" YELLOW PLASTIC CAP ALPINE LS9184 FOUND NO. 5 REBAR & 1-1/4" YELLOW PLASTIC CAP TRI-CO LS12707 FOUND NO. 6 REBAR & 3-1/4" ALUMINUM CAP STAMPED MS890/MS612 BLM 1954 (COR. 1 RIVERSIDE PLACER MS NO. 3905) FOUND NO. 6 REBAR & 3-1/4" ALUMINUM CAP STAMPED MS6120 COR 2 BLM 1954 3.0' BETWEEN CAPSCONCRETESTONE RETAINING WALL EDGE OF GRAVEL EDGE OF GRAVEL PAVED PEDESTRIAN PATH PAVED ROADWAY CRYSTAL LAKE OVERFLOW OUTLET PIPE PER PLAT BOOK 6 AT PAGE 18 FL O W L I N E L=89.75' R=375.00' CB=N84°45'04"E CH=89.55' L=21.21' R=375.00' CB=N79°36'36"E CH=21.21'(BASIS OF BEARINGS)S00°14'00"W 456.89'PLAT=457.24'229.76'227.13'S89°03'26"W 70.00' PLAT=N89°46'00"WN31°54 '08 "W 74 .69 'PLAT=N32°27 '17 "W 74 .05 'PLAT=N00°14'00"EN00°11'30'E 382.62'103.54'213.74'ROARING FORKRIVERWAT E R S E D G E JUL Y 2 0 2 0 LOT 11 1.104± ACRES 48,106± SQ.FT. LOT 13 OWNER ASPEN CLUB LOT 12 OWNER CG CRYSTAL LAKES HOLINGS LLC LOT 5 STILLWATER RANCH OWNER JOHN BURGESS LOT 6 STILLWATER RANCH OWNER GERSON TRUSTN15°17'23"W 965.17'(TIE)S85°34'02"E 1174.1 2 ' ( T I E ) CITY OF ASPEN 2009 GPS MONUMENT #18 CITY OF ASPEN 2009 GPS MONUMENT #19 FL O O D Z O N E A E FL O O D W A Y FL O O D Z O N E A E FL O O D Z O N E A E FL O O D Z O N E X FLOOD ZONE AE BASED FLOOD ELEVATION 7993 FLOO D Z O N E X FLOOD ZONE AE AREA WITHIN FLOODWAY SPECIAL FLOOD ZONE X AREA OF 0.2% ANNUAL CHANCE OF FLOOD GRAVEL TURNOUT CRYSTAL LAKE ROAD (24' PRIVATE RI G H T - O F - W A Y ) 5' WIDE UTILITY EASEMENT PLAT BOOK 5 PAGE 7 5' WIDE UTILITY EASEMENT PLAT BOOK 5 PAGE 7 5' WIDE UTILITY EASEMENT PLAT BOOK 5 PAGE 7 10' REAR SETBACK 5' ACCESSORY BUILDING SETBACK10' SIDE SETBACK10' SIDE SETBACK30' ACCESSORY SETBACK 25' SETBACK REAR YARD SETBACK LINE (EFFECTIVELY SUPERSEDED BY OPEN SPACE BOUNDARY AND STREAM MARGIN SETBACK LINES AS APPLICABLE 10' WIDE UTILITY EASEMENT PLAT BOOK 13 PAGE 92 10' WIDE UTILITY EASEMENT PLAT BOOK 13 PAGE 92 10' WIDE UTILITY EASEMENT PLAT BOOK 13 PAGE 92 TOP O F S L O P E RECE P T I O N N O. 6 8 0 9 1 0 800 6 800 7 80098010 8008 8005 8004 80038004 800 2 800 1 8 0 0 0 7 9 9 9 7 9 9 8 80 0 1 800280018000 7999 79987997799679957994 7993 7992 7991 7990 79907989799 1 VICINITY MAP LOT 11 - CALLAHAN SUBDIVISION SECTION 18, TOWNSHIP 10 SOUTH, RANGE 84 WEST OF THE 6TH PM COUNTY OF PITKIN, STATE OF COLORADO HISTORIC TOPOGRAPHIC MAP TRUE NORTH COLORADO LLC. A LAND SURVEYING AND MAPPING COMPANY P.O. BOX 614 - 386 MAIN STREET UNIT 3 NEW CASTLE, COLORADO 81647 (970) 984-0474 www.truenorthcolorado.com PROJECT NO: 2023-111 DATE: January 19, 2023 DRAWN RPK SURVEYED DJB SHEET 1 OF 1 TRUENORTH A LAND SURVEYING AND MAPPING COMPANY 20' 10'40' SCALE: 1" = 20' N PROPERTY DESCRIPTION: 0 NOTICE: ACCORDING TO COLORADO LAW YOU MUST COMMENCE ANY LEGAL ACTION BASED UPON ANY DEFECT IN THIS SURVEY WITHIN THREE YEARS AFTER YOU FIRST DISCOVER SUCH DEFECT. IN NO EVENT MAY ANY ACTION BASED UPON ANY DEFECT IN THIS SURVEY BE COMMENCED MORE THAN TEN YEARS FROM THE DATE OF CERTIFICATION SHOWN HEREON. SCALE: 1" = 800'HIGHWAY NO . 82 CRYSTAL LAKE ROAD WESTVIEW DRIVE LUPINE DR IVE CITY OF ASPEN ROARI N G F ORK RIVERNOTES: SURVEYOR 'S STATEMENT I, RODNEY P. KISER, DO HEREBY STATE THAT THIS HISTORIC TOPOGRAPHIC MAP WAS PREPARED BY TRUE NORTH COLORADO, LLC. FOR 1417 CRYSTAL LAKE LLC THAT THIS MAP WAS PREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY SUPERVISION AND RESPONSIBLE CHARGE AND THAT IT IS TRUE AND CORRECT TO THE BEST OF MY BELIEF AND KNOWLEDGE. SITE 59 Graphic ScaleIn Feet: 1" = 30'0153060Revision#Dwg No.Job No.Drawn by:Print Date:File:PE:QC:2022-467XXXXXXCrystalLake-SiteXX118 West Sixth Street, Suite 200 Glenwood Springs, CO 81601 970.945.1004 www.sgm-inc.com Date By:Of :Project Milestone: XPRELIMINARY NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION PITKIN COUNTY, CO 1417 CRYSTAL LAKE ROADTitle:Exhibit A760 Graphic ScaleIn Feet: 1" = 30'0153060Revision#Dwg No.Job No.Drawn by:Print Date:File:PE:QC:2022-467MHEXXRLBCrystalLake-ECPRLB118 West Sixth Street, Suite 200 Glenwood Springs, CO 81601 970.945.1004 www.sgm-inc.com Date By:Of :Project Milestone: XPRELIMINARY NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION Pitkin County, CO 1417 Crystal Lake RoadTitle:61 16141210080604131109070503+ 00.50201009999+00.5+99.25030200010203990001BS 00.5TW 03.5 0199989796959493929190LPTS 02.52%TS 1.5BS 0.5TS 00.1BS 99.54%+ 00.5+ 99.5SSHYD G802080158020801580108005800580008004800079957990 8002800580108015 8012 UP DN BBQPAPAPA PAPAPAPAPAC DATE#DESCRIPTION ISSUE DATE: SHEET NUMBER REVIEWED: PROJECT NUMBER: DRAWN: 1 REVISIONS 6905 2 3 4 5 6 7 A B C E ESKENAZI RESIDENCELOT 11, CALLAHAN SUBDIVISION C O P Y R I G H T D E S I G N W O R K S H O P, I N C. STREAM MARGIN REVIEW F 8 9 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 W W W . D E S I G N W O R K S H O P . C O M Dec 13, 2022 - 2:14pmC:\Users\DBagnasco\appdata\local\temp\AcPublish_26112\dw-6905-Stream Margin Review.dwgSITE PLAN L1-1 DESIGN WORKSHOP Landscape Architecture · Land Planning Urban Design · Tourism Planning Asheville · Aspen · Austin · Chicago · Denver · Dubai Houston · Lake Tahoe · Los Angeles · Shanghai 120 East Main Street (970) 925-8354 (970) 920-1387 Aspen, Colorado 81611 NORTH 0 ORIGINAL SCALE: 10 20 40 1"=20'-00"ASPEN, COLORADO, 81611PROPOSED RESIDENCE DECIDUOUS TREE TO REMAIN APPROVED TOP OF SLOPETOP OF SLOPE SETBACK PATIO EVERGREEN TREE TO REMAIN 10' SIDE SETBACK PROPERTY LINE 5' UTILITY EASEMENT 10' SIDE SETBACK PROPERTY LINE 5' UTILITY EASEMENT PROPOSED DRIVEWAY PROPOSED AUTOCOURT EXISTING CONTOUR PROPOSED CONTOUR PROPOSED BOULDER RETAINING WALLCRYSTAL LAKE ROAD12/20/2022 CW DB ROA RI N G F O R K RI V E R JUL Y 2 0 2 0 HI G H W A T E R LI N E PROPOSED STONE PAVING, TYP. ROOF OVERHANG, TYP. SPA PA 15'-0"R3UBH - ROARING FORK RIVER (PSS) PALUSTRINE SCRUB-SHRUB WETLANDS FLOOD ZONE AEFLOOD ZONE XFLOOD ZONE AE BASED FLOOD ELEVATION 7993 SPECIAL FLOOD ZONE X AREA OF 0.2% ANNUAL CHANCE OF FLOOD FLOOD ZONE AE FLOODWAYFLOOD ZONE AEFLOOD ZONE AE WITHIN FLOODWAY (PEM) PALUSTRINE EMERGENT WETLANDS PROPOSED GRAVEL PATH Exhibit A8 62 16141210080604131109070503+ 00.50201009999+00.5+99.25030200010203990001BS 00.5TW 03.5 0199989796959493929190LPTS 02.52%TS 1.5BS 0.5TS 00.1BS 99.54%+ 00.5+ 99.55008021.620LS91845088021.620LS9184EESSHYD G802080158020801580108005800580008004800079957990 8002800580108015 8012 UP DN ? ALIGN ALIGN ALIGN 2 2 4 4 3 3 1 1 E E G G D D F F A A B B C C BBQPAPAPA PAPAPAPAPAC DATE#DESCRIPTION ISSUE DATE: SHEET NUMBER REVIEWED: PROJECT NUMBER: DRAWN: 1 REVISIONS 6905 2 3 4 5 6 7 A B C E ESKENAZI RESIDENCELOT 11, CALLAHAN SUBDIVISION C O P Y R I G H T D E S I G N W O R K S H O P, I N C. STREAM MARGIN REVIEW F 8 9 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 W W W . D E S I G N W O R K S H O P . C O M Dec 13, 2022 - 2:14pmC:\Users\DBagnasco\appdata\local\temp\AcPublish_26112\dw-6905-Stream Margin Review.dwgPLANTING PLAN L1-2 DESIGN WORKSHOP Landscape Architecture · Land Planning Urban Design · Tourism Planning Asheville · Aspen · Austin · Chicago · Denver · Dubai Houston · Lake Tahoe · Los Angeles · Shanghai 120 East Main Street (970) 925-8354 (970) 920-1387 Aspen, Colorado 81611 NORTH 0 ORIGINAL SCALE: 10 20 40 1"=20'-00"ASPEN, COLORADO, 8161112/20/2022 CW DB NATIVE RE-VEGETATION THIMBLEBERRY WOODS ROSE PITKIN COUNTY NATIVE MIX & COMMON LUPINE SIZE: SEED SPACING: 8-12 LBS/ACRE AREA: 8,500 SF DWARF SUMAC NO MOW FESCUE MALE FERN ROCKY MOUNTAIN COLUMBINE SIZE:5 GALLON SPACING: 24” O.C. QTY: 310 SIZE:5 GALLON SPACING: 24” O.C. QTY: 115 SIZE:5 GALLON SPACING: 24” O.C. QTY: 210 SIZE:SOD SPACING: N/A AREA:575 SQ FT SIZE: 5 GALLON SPACING: 12” O.C. QTY: 250 SIZE: 1 GALLON SPACING: 18” O.C. QTY: 15 PONDEROSA PINE SIZE: 12-18' HT QTY: 1 QUAKING ASPEN SINGLE STEM SIZE: 4-6" CAL SPACING: 6-12' O.C. QTY: 22 R3UBH - ROARING FORK RIVER (PSS) PALUSTRINE SCRUB-SHRUB WETLANDS (PEM) PALUSTRINE EMERGENT WETLANDS PROPOSED RESIDENCE DECIDUOUS TREE TO REMAIN APPROVED TOP OF SLOPETOP OF SLOPE SETBACK PATIO EVERGREEN TREE TO REMAIN 10' SIDE SETBACK PROPERTY LINE 5' UTILITY EASEMENT 10' SIDE SETBACK PROPERTY LINE 5' UTILITY EASEMENT PROPOSED DRIVEWAY PROPOSED AUTOCOURT EXISTING CONTOUR PROPOSED CONTOUR PROPOSED BOULDER RETAINING WALLCRYSTAL LAKE ROADROA RI N G F O R K RI V E R JUL Y 2 0 2 0 HI G H W A T E R LI N E PROPOSED STONE PAVING, TYP. ROOF OVERHANG, TYP. SPA PA FLOOD ZONE AEFLOOD ZONE XFLOOD ZONE AE FLOODWAYFLOOD ZONE AEPROPOSED GRAVEL PATH QUAKING ASPEN MULTI STEM SIZE: 4-6" CAL SPACING: 6-12' O.C. QTY: 22 63 CRYSTAL LAKE RD ROARI NG FORK RI VERA P P R O V E D T O P O F S L O P E T O P O F S L O P E S E T B A C K10' SIDE YARD SETBACK10' SIDE YARD SETBACK25 ' P RI N CI PA L B U I L D IN G S E T B A C K 3 0' A CC E SS OR Y SE T B A C K PROPERTY LINEPROPERTY LINEPAVED PEDESTRIAN PATHPROPOSED SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENCE LOT 11 1.104 (+/-) ACRES 48,106 (+/-) SQ. FT.15' -0" 10'-0" 10'-0" 1 A 11'-9" A1.10 3 sheet: title: checked by: drawn by: project manager: principal architect:project:revisions: job no.: stamp/seal: SITE PLAN A1.00 21140 JB EL EAST ASPEN RESIDENCENOT FOR CONSTRUCTION 11/23/2022 STREAM MARGIN REVIEW SET NK Lot 11, Callahan Subdivision Pitkin County, Colorado, USASCALE: 1" = 20'-0" 1 SITE PLAN GENERAL NOTES 1.SITE MAIN LEVEL: FFE 8000'-6" = ARCHITECTURAL: FFE 100'-0" 2. SITE UTILITIES SHOWN FOR CONCEPT ONLY. FINAL LAYOUT SHALL BE DESIGNED AND DOCUMENTED BY CONTRACTOR AND LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT. ARCHITECT TO REVIEW AND APPROVE LOCATIONS AT BUILDING. 3.REFERENCE LANDSCAPE DRAWINGS FOR ALL LANDSCAPE WORK. 4.REFERENCE CIVIL DRAWINGS FOR ALL CIVIL WORK. no.: date: description: N 10' 20'40'0' Exhibit A9 64 26.575.020.(c): NET LOT AREA CITY OF ASPEN MEDIUM-DENSITY (R-15) ZONE DISTRICT NET LOT AREA PER 1.19.23 KISER HISTORIC TOPOGRAPHIC MAP = 43,367 SF SLOPE CATEGORIES % COUNTED TOWARDS NET LOT AREA AREA TOTAL 0% -20% 20% -30% 30% + UNDER HIGH WATER MARK NET LOT AREA = 100% 50% 0% 0% 42,602 SF 1,530 SF 166 SF 3, 808 SF 43,367 SF 42,602 SF 765 SF 0 0 26.710.050: ALLOWABLE FLOOR AREA ("FA") PER R-15 ZONE DISTRICT NET LOT AREA 15,000 -50,000 SF CALCULATION 4,500 SQUARE FEET OF FLOOR AREA, PLUS 6 SQUARE FEET OF FLOOR AREA FOR EACH ADDITIONAL 100 SQUARE FEET IN NET LOT AREA UP TO A MAXIMUM OF 6,600 SQUARE FEET 4,500 + ((28,367/100) x 6) = 4,500 + 1,702 ALLOWABLE FA 6,202 SF CALCULATION 6,202 SF X 15% 26.575.020.(d)(5): ALLOWABLE FLOOR AREA FOR DECKS, BALCONIES, ETC. ALLOWABLE FA 930 SF 26.575.020.(d): MEASUREMENT OF FLOOR AREA NOTE: FLOOR AREA IS MEASURED FROM EXTERIOR FACE OF FRAMING PER 26.575.020.(d). OWNER RESERVES THE RIGHT TO UTILIZE ALLOWABLE FLOOR AREA. EXEMPTION = 6,202 SF ALLOWED 2 2 4 4 3 3 1 1 E E G G D D F F A A B B C C 4,180 SF MAIN LEVEL 858 SF DECK - EXEMPTED FRONT PORCH - EXEMPTED CANOPY7'-8"CANOPY ABOVE 6'-0" CANOPY ABOVE 10'-6" DECK ABOVE 14'-4" 375 SF GARAGE AREA - EXEMPTED 284 SF GARAGE AREA PATIO - EXEMPTED FLOOR AREA TYPES LEGEND CONDITIONED SPACE DECK/PORCH - EXEMPTED GARAGE GARAGE - EXEMPTED PATIO PATIO - EXEMPTED PATIO - EXEMPTED200 SF PATIO 2 2 4 4 3 3 1 1 E E G G D D F F A A B B C C LOWER LEVEL - EXEMPTED CRAWL SPACE - EXEMPTED FLOOR AREA TYPES LEGEND CONDITIONED SPACE CRAWL SPACE NOTE: CRAWL SPACE TO BE 5'-6" OR LESS IN HEIGHT. NOTE: LOWER LEVEL AREA TO BE FULLY SUBGRADE. 2 2 4 4 3 3 1 1 E E G G D D F F A A B B C C 1,537 SF UPPER LEVEL STAIR AREA -EXEMPTED ELEVATOR AREA - EXEMPTED 76 SF DECK - EXEMPTED FLOOR AREA TYPES LEGEND CONDITIONED SPACE DECK/PORCH - EXEMPTED VERTICAL CIRCULATION sheet: title: checked by: drawn by: project manager: principal architect:project:revisions: job no.: stamp/seal: CODE AND ZONING COMPLIANCE - FLOOR AREA G0.01 21140 JB EL EAST ASPEN RESIDENCENOT FOR CONSTRUCTION 11/23/2022 STREAM MARGIN REVIEW SET NK LOT 11, CALLAHAN SUBDIVISION PITKIN COUNTY, CO, USAno.: date: description: SCALE: 3/32" = 1'-0" 2 MAIN LEVEL AREA PLAN SCALE: 3/32" = 1'-0" 1 LOWER LEVEL AREA PLAN SCALE: 3/32" = 1'-0" 3 UPPER LEVEL AREA PLAN EXEMPTED FLOOR AREA 00 LOWER LEVEL LOWER LEVEL - EXEMPTED 26.575.020.(d)(9) CRAWL SPACE - EXEMPTED 26.575.020.(d)(4) 01 MAIN LEVEL DECK - EXEMPTED 26.575.020.(d)(5) FRONT PORCH - EXEMPTED 26.575.010.(d)(6) GARAGE AREA - EXEMPTED 26.575.020.(d)(8) PATIO - EXEMPTED 26.575.020.(d)(7) PATIO - EXEMPTED 26.575.020.(d)(7) 02 UPPER LEVEL STAIR AREA - EXEMPTED 26.575.020.(d)(3) ELEVATOR AREA - EXEMPTED 26.575.020.(d)(3) DECK - EXEMPTED 26.575.020.(d)(5) TOTAL FAR 01 MAIN LEVEL PATIO 200 SF GARAGE AREA 284 SF MAIN LEVEL 4,180 SF 4,665 SF 02 UPPER LEVEL UPPER LEVEL 1,537 SF 1,537 SF TOTAL FAR 6,202 SF 65 TOP OF SLOPE 45 DEGREE PROGRESSIVE HEIGHT LIMIT TOP OF SLOPE 45 DEGREE PROGRESSIVE HEIGHT LIMIT 1 G A A P P R O V E D T O P O F S L O P E T O P O F S L O P E S E T B A C K 15' -0"10' SIDE YARD SETBACKPROPERTY LINE10'-0"10' SIDE YARD SETBACKPROPERTY LINE10'-0" 7,999'-2 3/8" TOPO (EX.) ∆= PROPOSED - EXISTING ∴ ∆= 24'-6 5/8" ∆= BUILDING -TOPO ∴ ∆= 23'-6 5/8" 8,023'-3 3/8" BUILDING 7,999'-8 3/4" TOPO (EX.) 8,021'-8 3/4" BUILDING 8,000'-9 1/4" TOPO (EX.) ∆= BUILDING -TOPO ∴ ∆= 20'-11 1/2" 8,021'-0" BUILDING 8,001'-7 7/8" TOPO (EX.) ∆= BUILDING -TOPO ∴ ∆= 19'-4 1/8" ∆= BUILDING -TOPO ∴ ∆= 22'-8 3/8" 8,012'-0" BUILDING ∆= BUILDING -TOPO ∴ ∆= 11'-6" 8,000'-6" TOPO (PROP.) 8,000'-6" TOPO (PROP.) 8,000'-6" TOPO (PROP.) 8,012'-0" BUILDING (EX.) ∆= BUILDING -TOPO ∴ ∆= 11'-6" 8,023'-3 3/8" BUILDING 8,000'-3" TOPO (EX.) ∆= BUILDING -TOPO ∴ ∆= 23'-0 3/8" 8,023'-9" BUILDING 8,023'-9" BUILDING 7,999'-6 3/4" TOPO (EX.) ∆= BUILDING -TOPO ∴ ∆= 24'-2 1/4" 8,013'-6" BUILDING 8,000'-6" TOPO (PROP.) ∆= BUILDING -TOPO ∴ ∆= 13'-0" 8,013'-6" BUILDING ∆= BUILDING -TOPO ∴ ∆= 13'-0" 8,012'-0" BUILDING 7,999'-6 5/8" TOPO (EX.) ∆= BUILDING -TOPO ∴ ∆= 12'-5 3/8" 8,012'-0" BUILDING 7,998'-5 1/2" TOPO (EX.) ∆= BUILDING -TOPO ∴ ∆= 13'-6 1/2" 8,012'-0" BUILDING 7,999'-2 7/8" TOPO (EX.) ∆= BUILDING -TOPO ∴ ∆= 12'-9 1/8" 8,013'-6" BUILDING 8,000'-6" TOPO (PROP.) ∆= BUILDING -TOPO ∴ ∆= 13'-0" 8,022'-10 3/8" BUILDING8,022'-10 3/8" BUILDING 8,000'-6" TOPO (PROP.) ∆= BUILDING -TOPO ∴ ∆= 22'-8 3/8"A1.111A1.112A1.11334'-7"16'-9"4'-11"10'-1"19'-2"5'-4"1 5'- 0 " 15'-0" 8,000'-6" TOPO (EX.) sheet: title: checked by: drawn by: project manager: principal architect:project:revisions: job no.: stamp/seal: CODE AND ZONING COMPLIANCE - HEIGHT, SETBACKS A1.10 21140 JB EL EAST ASPEN RESIDENCENOT FOR CONSTRUCTION 11/23/2022 STREAM MARGIN REVIEW SET NK Lot 11, Callahan Subdivision Pitkin County, Colorado, USAno.: date: description: SCALE: 2 SE AXONOMETRIC - PROPOSED SCALE: 1 SW AXONOMETRIC - PROPOSED N 4' 8' 16'0"SCALE: 1/8" = 1'-0" 3 ENLARGED SITE PLAN - BUILDING HEIGHT COMPLIANCE DIAGRAM GENERAL NOTES BUILDING HEIGHT CALCULATIONS / CODE COMPLIANCE 1.THE SPOT ELEVATION SYMBOL SHOWN ABOVE INDICATES THE BUILDING HIGH POINT ELEVATION TAKEN FROM THE SURFACE OF THE ROOF INCLUSIVE OF THE FIRST LAYER OF EXTERIOR SHEATHING BUT EXCLUDING EXTERIOR SURFACE TREATMENTS. 2.THE SPOT ELEVATION SYMBOL SHOWN ABOVE INDICATES THE TOPOGRAPHICAL ELEVATION OF EXISTING (SUFFIX "(EX.)") GRADE OR PROPOSED (SUFFIX "(PROP.)") GRADE, APPLYING WHICHEVER VALUE IS LESSER, WHERE EITHER THE EXTERIOR PERIMETER OF THE BUILDING MEETS GRADE OR IN THE EVENT THAT THE BUILDING DOES NOT MEET GRADE (I.E., CANOPIES), THE ELEVATION OF THE POINT DIRECTLY BELOW THE PROPOSED OBJECT. 3.FOR THE PURPOSE OF SHOWING COMPLIANCE TO HEIGHT RESTRICTIONS, THE FOLLOWING FORMULA IS USED TO DEFINE THE CHANGE IN HEIGHT FROM EXISTING OR PROPOSED GRADE TO THE PROPOSED BUILDING ELEVATION: ∆= BUILDING -TOPO, WHERE "BUILDING" IS THE VALUE SHOWN WITH NOTE #1 ABOVE AND "TOPO" IS THE VALUE SHOWN WITH NOTE #2 ABOVE. XX'-XX" BUILDING XX'-XX" TOPO (EX./PROP.) NTS NTS 66 100'-0" MAIN LEVEL F.F. 111'-0" UPPER LEVEL F.F. 90'-0" LOWER LEVEL F.F. G A 45° PRIMARY BED BAR GRATE WALKOUT DECK PRIMARY SUITE HALL DININGOUTDOOR DINING ENTRY HALL POWDER GARAGE SEASONAL STORAGE LOWER HALL45 DEGREE PROGRESSIVE HEIGHT LIMITTOP OF SLOPETOP OF SLOPE SETBACK2 5 ' MA X HEI G HT 25' MAX HEIGHTROARING FORK RIVER(JULY 2020 HIGH WATER LINE)16'-9"34'-7" SEASONAL STORAGE 100'-0" MAIN LEVEL F.F. 111'-0" UPPER LEVEL F.F. 90'-0" LOWER LEVEL F.F. G A TOP OF SLOPETOP OF SLOPE SETBACK10'-1" 4'-11" 45°45 DEGREE PROGRESSIVE HEIGHT LIMITOFFICE / DEN MECH./ ELEC. 100'-0" MAIN LEVEL F.F. 111'-0" UPPER LEVEL F.F. 95'-6" CRAWL SPACE LEVEL G A GUEST BEDROOM GUEST BEDROOM GUEST BEDROOM BUNKS SEMI-CONDITIONED CRAWLSPACE SEMI-CONDITIONED CRAWLSPACE SEMI-CONDITIONED CRAWLSPACE SEMI-CONDITIONED CRAWLSPACETOP OF SLOPETOP OF SLOPE SETBACK5'-4" 19'-2" 45°45 DEGREE PROGRESSIVE HEIGHT LIMITsheet: title: checked by: drawn by: project manager: principal architect:project:revisions: job no.: stamp/seal: SITE SECTIONS A1.11 21140 JB EL EAST ASPEN RESIDENCENOT FOR CONSTRUCTION 11/23/2022 STREAM MARGIN REVIEW SET NK Lot 11, Callahan Subdivision Pitkin County, Colorado, USAno.: date: description: SCALE: 1/8" = 1'-0" 1 SITE SECTION 1 SCALE: 1/8" = 1'-0" 2 SITE SECTION 2 SCALE: 1/8" = 1'-0" 3 SITE SECTION 3 4' 8' 16'0" 4' 8' 16'0" 4' 8' 16'0" 67 UP A3.02 2 A3.00 1 A3.00 2 A3.02 1 MECH./ ELEC. 004 A3.01 3 A3.01 2 2 2 4 4 3 3 1 1 E E G G D D F F A3.01 1 A A B B ELEVATOR STAIR 100-B 26'-0"33'-0"24'-0"83'-0"16'-6"33'-6"16'-0"24'-0"24'-0" C C 63'-6" 68'-6"5'-0" SEASONAL STORAGE 002 A3.102A4.002A4.001A3.10 3 W1a LOWER HALL 001 003.1 001.1002.1 W1aW1a W1a W1a W1a W1 W1 W1 W1 SEMI-CONDITIONED CRAWLSPACE 005 95'-6" F1 F1F1 F2 F2 SEASONAL STORAGE 003 004.1 005.1 90'-0" 90'-0" ACCESS HATCH sheet: title: checked by: drawn by: project manager: principal architect:project:revisions: job no.: stamp/seal: LOWER LEVEL FLOOR PLAN A2.00 21140 JB EL EAST ASPEN RESIDENCENOT FOR CONSTRUCTION 11/23/2022 STREAM MARGIN REVIEW SET NK Lot 11, Callahan Subdivision Pitkin County, Colorado, USASCALE: 1/4" = 1'-0" 1 LOWER LEVEL PLAN N2' 4' 8'0" GENERAL NOTES 1.SITE MAIN LEVEL: FFE 8000'-6" = ARCHITECTURAL: FFE 100'-0" 2. SITE UTILITIES SHOWN FOR CONCEPT ONLY. FINAL LAYOUT SHALL BE DESIGNED AND DOCUMENTED BY CONTRACTOR AND LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT. ARCHITECT TO REVIEW AND APPROVE LOCATIONS AT BUILDING. 3.REFERENCE LANDSCAPE DRAWINGS FOR ALL LANDSCAPE WORK. 4.REFERENCE CIVIL DRAWINGS FOR ALL CIVIL WORK. 90°PROJECT NORTHno.: date: description: 68 UP DN A3.02 2 A3.00 1 A3.00 2 A3.02 1 GUEST BEDROOM 111 GUEST BATH 111-A A3.01 3 A3.01 2 A P P ROV E D T OP OF S L OP E T OP OF S L OP E S E T B A CK 10' SIDE YARD SETBACK 10' SIDE YARD SETBACK A3.10 1 2 2 4 4 3 3 1 1 E E 26'-0"33'-0"24'-0"83'-0"G G 16'-6"10'-0"23'-6"16'-0"24'-0"24'-0"14'-0" D D F F A3.01 1 PRINCIPAL ENTRANCE LOCKERLOCKERART STAIR A A B B 90'-0" LINE OF DECK ABOVE LINE OF ROOF ABOVELINE OF ROOF ABOVE LINE OF ROOF ABOVE LINE OFROOF ABOVELINE OF STEEL CANOPY ABOVEART ELEVATOR HANG-DRY LAUNDRY / MUDROOM 103 POWDER 102 MECH. CHASE ENTRY HALL 101 ENTRY 100 GARAGE 104 STORAGE CLOSETS BUNKS 114 LINE OF STEEL CANOPY ABOVE WALKWAY OUTDOOR LIVING GUEST BATH 114-A W D 100'-0" C C OFFICE / DEN 109 LIVING 108 DINING 107 KITCHEN 106 PANTRY 105 CHASE STORAGE ISLANDW D ø 60" REF DOG WASH GUEST HALL 110 GUEST BEDROOM 113 GUEST BEDROOM 112 GUEST BATH 113-A GUEST BATH 112-A A3.102ø 60" WET BAR SLIDERSLIDERART SUSPENDED GAS F.P.A4.002A4.001A3.10 3 F4 F4 F4 102.1 F4103.1103.2 F3FD 104.1 104.2 104.4 100.2100.1F5 F5 100'-0" 106.1 105.1CHASE 107.1108.1109.2109.1 109.3109.4F5-A F5-A EXTENT OF F5-A ASSEMBLY EXTENT OF F5 ASSEMBLY F5-A 100'-0"F5-A 111-A.1 111.1112.1 112-A.1 F5-A F6-AF7-A F6-A F7-A F5-AF5-A F6-A F6-A F6-A F7-A F5-A 113-A.1 113.1114.1114.2 114.A.1 114.A.2 16'-6"17'-9"17'-9"16'-6"5'-0"CLR4'-0"W2 W2 W2 W2 W2 W2 W2 W3 W2 W2-A W2 W2 W2W2-A 104.3 3'-3"4'-9" A8.00 5 68'-6" EGRESS WINDOW EGRESS WINDOW EGRESS WINDOW EGRESS WINDOW 4'-9" BBQ FD 1/8" / 12" MIN1/8" / 12" MIN1/8" / 12" MIN 1/8" / 12" MIN 1/8" / 12" MIN1/8" / 12" MIN1/8" / 12" MIN1/8" / 12" MIN DESK REF REF.FREEZE OUTDOOR DINING 106-A A5.01 1 A5.03 1 A5.03 x sheet: title: checked by: drawn by: project manager: principal architect:project:revisions: job no.: stamp/seal: MAIN LEVEL FLOOR PLAN A2.10 21140 JB EL EAST ASPEN RESIDENCENOT FOR CONSTRUCTION 11/23/2022 STREAM MARGIN REVIEW SET NK Lot 11, Callahan Subdivision Pitkin County, Colorado, USASCALE: 1/4" = 1'-0" 1 MAIN LEVEL PLAN N2' 4' 8'0" GENERAL NOTES 1.SITE MAIN LEVEL: FFE 8000'-6" = ARCHITECTURAL: FFE 100'-0" 2. SITE UTILITIES SHOWN FOR CONCEPT ONLY. FINAL LAYOUT SHALL BE DESIGNED AND DOCUMENTED BY CONTRACTOR AND LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT. ARCHITECT TO REVIEW AND APPROVE LOCATIONS AT BUILDING. 3.REFERENCE LANDSCAPE DRAWINGS FOR ALL LANDSCAPE WORK. 4.REFERENCE CIVIL DRAWINGS FOR ALL CIVIL WORK. 90°PROJECT NORTHno.: date: description: 69 DN ALIGN ALIGN ALIGN ALIGN A3.02 2 A3.00 1 A3.00 2 A3.02 1 A3.01 3 A3.01 2 A3.10 1 2 2 4 4 3 3 1 1 E E G G D D F F PRIMARY CLOSET 202 PRIMARY BED 203 BAR GRATE WALKOUT DECK 204 PRIMARY BATH 201 OUTDOOR SHOWER 201-E A3.01 1 A A B B 16'-6"10'-0"23'-6"16'-0"24'-0"24'-0" 64'-0"26'-0"33'-0"24'-0"83'-0"LINE OF ROOF ABOVE LINE OF ROOF ABOVEELEVATOR C C BENCH CHASE A3.102STK W/D SUSPENDED GAS F.P.A4.002A4.001A3.10 3 W2 W2 W2 W2 W3 F6 F7 F7-B F6-B STAIR WC 201-A WC 201-B SHOWER 201-C200.1201.1EXTENT OF F6 ASSEMBLY EXTENT OF F6 ASSEMBLY PRIMARY SUITE HALL 200 111'-0"201.3201.2 EXTENT OF F5-B ASSEMBLY EXTENT OF F5 ASSEMBLY EXTENT OF F5-B ASSEMBLYEXTENT OF F5 ASSEMBLY F5b F5b 111'-0"203.1203.2202.2 202.1 201.4PRIMARY SUITE HALL 200 A8.00 1 A8.003A8.007A8.00 6 4'-1"4'-1"A5.05 1 sheet: title: checked by: drawn by: project manager: principal architect:project:revisions: job no.: stamp/seal: UPPER LEVEL FLOOR PLAN A2.20 21140 JB EL EAST ASPEN RESIDENCENOT FOR CONSTRUCTION 11/23/2022 STREAM MARGIN REVIEW SET NK Lot 11, Callahan Subdivision Pitkin County, Colorado, USASCALE: 1/4" = 1'-0" 1 UPPER LEVEL PLAN 2' 4' 8'0"NGENERAL NOTES 1.SITE MAIN LEVEL: FFE 8000'-6" = ARCHITECTURAL: FFE 100'-0" 2. SITE UTILITIES SHOWN FOR CONCEPT ONLY. FINAL LAYOUT SHALL BE DESIGNED AND DOCUMENTED BY CONTRACTOR AND LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT. ARCHITECT TO REVIEW AND APPROVE LOCATIONS AT BUILDING. 3.REFERENCE LANDSCAPE DRAWINGS FOR ALL LANDSCAPE WORK. 4.REFERENCE CIVIL DRAWINGS FOR ALL CIVIL WORK. 90°PROJECT NORTHno.: date: description: 70 100'-0" MAIN LEVEL F.F. 111'-0" UPPER LEVEL F.F. 243 1 25' MAX HEIGHT WOOD SIDING, SILVERED, TYP. PAINTED STEEL CANOPY PAINTED STEEL SIDING 100'-0" MAIN LEVEL F.F. 111'-0" UPPER LEVEL F.F. 119'-0" UPPER LEVEL CLERESTORY E GDFABC 25' MAX HEIGHT WOOD SIDING, SILVERED, TYP. PAINTED STEEL CANOPY FRAMING PER STRUCTURAL PAINTING STEEL SIDING PAINTED STEEL FRAMING PER STRUCTURAL, TYP. PERFORATED PAINTED STEEL SIDING PAINTED STEEL CHIMNEY THERMALLY BROKEN STEEL WINDOWS, TYP. TERRACE PER LANDSCAPE sheet: title: checked by: drawn by: project manager: principal architect:project:revisions: job no.: stamp/seal: EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS A3.00 21140 JB EL EAST ASPEN RESIDENCENOT FOR CONSTRUCTION 11/23/2022 STREAM MARGIN REVIEW SET NK Lot 11, Callahan Subdivision Pitkin County, Colorado, USASCALE: 1/4" = 1'-0" 2 NORTH ELEVATION SCALE: 1/4" = 1'-0" 1 WEST ELEVATION 2' 4' 8'0" 2' 4' 8'0" no.: date: description: 71 100'-0" MAIN LEVEL F.F. 113'-0" GREAT ROOM T.O. ROOF 23 25' MAX HEIGHT PAINTED STEEL FASCIA PAINTED STEEL SIDING PAINTED STEEL CHIMNEY THERMALLY BROKEN STEEL WINDOWS, TYP. 100'-0" MAIN LEVEL F.F. 113'-0" GREAT ROOM T.O. ROOF ED FBC 25' MAX HEIGHT WOOD SIDING, SILVERED, TYP. THERMALLY BROKEN STEEL WINDOWS, TYP. 100'-0" MAIN LEVEL F.F. 111'-0" UPPER LEVEL F.F. 119'-0" UPPER LEVEL CLERESTORY EG DF ABC 25' MAX HEIGHT WOOD SIDING, SILVERED, TYP. PAINTED STEEL CANOPY FRAMING PER STRUCTURAL PAINTED STEEL SIDING PAINTED STEEL FRAMING PER STRUCTURAL, TYP. PAINTED STEEL CHIMNEY THERMALLY BROKEN STEEL WINDOWS, TYP. TERRACE PER LANDSCAPE, TYP. sheet: title: checked by: drawn by: project manager: principal architect:project:revisions: job no.: stamp/seal: EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS A3.01 21140 JB EL EAST ASPEN RESIDENCENOT FOR CONSTRUCTION 11/23/2022 STREAM MARGIN REVIEW SET NK Lot 11, Callahan Subdivision Pitkin County, Colorado, USASCALE: 1/4" = 1'-0" 2 EXTERIOR ELEVATION - COURTYARD SOUTH SCALE: 1/4" = 1'-0" 3 EXTERIOR ELEVATION - COURTYARD EAST SCALE: 1/4" = 1'-0" 1 EXTERIOR ELEVATION - COURTYARD WEST 2' 4' 8'0" 2' 4' 8'0"2' 4' 8'0" no.: date: description: 72 100'-0" MAIN LEVEL F.F. 111'-0" UPPER LEVEL F.F. 119'-0" UPPER LEVEL CLERESTORY EG DF ABC 25' MAX HEIGHT WOOD SIDING, SILVERED, TYP. THERMALLY BROKEN STEEL WINDOWS, TYP. 100'-0" MAIN LEVEL F.F. 111'-0" UPPER LEVEL F.F. 2 431 25' MAX HEIGHT WOOD SIDING, SILVERED, TYP. PAINTED STEEL FASCIA PAINTED STEEL FRAMING PER STRUCTURAL, TYP. THERMALLY BROKEN STEEL WINDOWS, TYP. SLIDER SLIDER PAINTED STEEL CHIMNEY sheet: title: checked by: drawn by: project manager: principal architect:project:revisions: job no.: stamp/seal: EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS A3.02 21140 JB EL EAST ASPEN RESIDENCENOT FOR CONSTRUCTION 11/23/2022 STREAM MARGIN REVIEW SET NK Lot 11, Callahan Subdivision Pitkin County, Colorado, USASCALE: 1/4" = 1'-0" 1 EAST ELEVATION SCALE: 1/4" = 1'-0" 2 SOUTH ELEVATION 2' 4' 8'0" 2' 4' 8'0" no.: date: description: 73 100'-0" MAIN LEVEL F.F. 111'-0" UPPER LEVEL F.F. 90'-0" LOWER LEVEL F.F. E GDFABC LAUNDRY / MUDROOM 103 GARAGE 104 STAIR 100-B STAIR 100-B ENTRY 100 PRIMARY BATH 201 PRIMARY CLOSET 202 PRIMARY BED 203 KITCHEN 106 25' MAX HEIGHT SEASONAL STORAGE 002 A4.01 2 A4.01 3 8'-6"9'-6"8'-6"SEASONAL STORAGE 003 100'-0" MAIN LEVEL F.F. 111'-0" UPPER LEVEL F.F. 90'-0" LOWER LEVEL F.F. 95'-6" CRAWL SPACE LEVEL 2 431 MECH./ ELEC. 004 LIVING 108 DINING 107 KITCHEN 106 PANTRY 105 PRIMARY BATH 201 GUEST BEDROOM 111 A4.00 3 25' MAX HEIGHT SEMI-CONDITIONED CRAWLSPACE 00511'-6"GUEST HALL 11010'-10"9'-6"9'-6"SEASONAL STORAGE 003 100'-0" MAIN LEVEL F.F. 90'-0" LOWER LEVEL F.F. 113'-0" GREAT ROOM T.O. ROOF E F A4.01 1 DINING 107 25' MAX HEIGHT MECH./ ELEC. 004 sheet: title: checked by: drawn by: project manager: principal architect:project:revisions: job no.: stamp/seal: BUILDING SECTIONS A3.10 21140 JB EL EAST ASPEN RESIDENCENOT FOR CONSTRUCTION 11/23/2022 STREAM MARGIN REVIEW SET NK Lot 11, Callahan Subdivision Pitkin County, Colorado, USA2' 4' 8'0"SCALE: 1/4" = 1'-0" 1 N-S BUILDING SECTION SCALE: 1/4" = 1'-0" 2 E-W BUILDING SECTION 2' 4' 8'0"2' 4' 8'0"SCALE: 1/4" = 1'-0" 3 SECTION THROUGH GREAT ROOM no.: date: description: 74 16141210080604131109070503+ 00.50201009999+00.5+99.25030200010203990001BS 00.5TW 03.5 0199989796959493929190LPTS 02.52%TS 1.5BS 0.5TS 00.1BS 99.54%+ 00.5+ 99.5SSHYD G802080158020801580108005800580008004800079957990 8002800580108015 8012 UP DN BBQPAPAPA PAPAPAPAPAC DATE#DESCRIPTION ISSUE DATE: SHEET NUMBER REVIEWED: PROJECT NUMBER: DRAWN: 1 REVISIONS 6905 2 3 4 5 6 7 A B C E ESKENAZI RESIDENCELOT 11, CALLAHAN SUBDIVISION C O P Y R I G H T D E S I G N W O R K S H O P, I N C. STREAM MARGIN REVIEW F 8 9 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 W W W . D E S I G N W O R K S H O P . C O M Dec 06, 2022 - 11:13pmC:\Users\DBagnasco\appdata\local\temp\AcPublish_21756\dw-6905-Stream Margin Review.dwgSITE PLAN L1-1 DESIGN WORKSHOP Landscape Architecture · Land Planning Urban Design · Tourism Planning Asheville · Aspen · Austin · Chicago · Denver · Dubai Houston · Lake Tahoe · Los Angeles · Shanghai 120 East Main Street (970) 925-8354 (970) 920-1387 Aspen, Colorado 81611 NORTH 0 ORIGINAL SCALE: 10 20 40 1"=20'-00"ASPEN, COLORADO, 81611PROPOSED RESIDENCE DECIDUOUS TREE TO REMAIN APPROVED TOP OF SLOPETOP OF SLOPE SETBACK PATIO EVERGREEN TREE TO REMAIN 10' SIDE SETBACK PROPERTY LINE 5' UTILITY EASEMENT 10' SIDE SETBACK PROPERTY LINE 5' UTILITY EASEMENT PROPOSED DRIVEWAY PROPOSED AUTOCOURT EXISTING CONTOUR PROPOSED CONTOUR PROPOSED BOULDER RETAINING WALLCRYSTAL LAKE ROAD11/21/2022 CW DB ROA RI N G F O R K RI V E R JUL Y 2 0 2 0 HI G H W A T E R LI N E PROPOSED STONE PAVING, TYP. ROOF OVERHANG, TYP. SPA PA 15'-0"R3UBH - ROARING FORK RIVER (PSS) PALUSTRINE SCRUB-SHRUB WETLANDS FLOOD ZONE AEFLOOD ZONE XFLOOD ZONE AE BASED FLOOD ELEVATION 7993 SPECIAL FLOOD ZONE X AREA OF 0.2% ANNUAL CHANCE OF FLOOD FLOOD ZONE AE FLOODWAYFLOOD ZONE AEFLOOD ZONE AE WITHIN FLOODWAY (PEM) PALUSTRINE EMERGENT WETLANDS PROPOSED GRAVEL PATH FIXTURE SPECIFICATIONS ARE INDICATIVE AND MAY BE ADJUD WITH SIMILAR SPECIFICATIONS Exhibit A10 75 C DATE#DESCRIPTION ISSUE DATE: SHEET NUMBER REVIEWED: PROJECT NUMBER: DRAWN: REVISIONS 6905ESKENAZI RESIDENCELOT 11, CALLAHAN SUBDIVISION C O P Y R I G H T D E S I G N W O R K S H O P, I N C. STREAM MARGIN REVIEW W W W . D E S I G N W O R K S H O P . C O M Dec 06, 2022 - 11:13pmC:\Users\DBagnasco\appdata\local\temp\AcPublish_21756\dw-6905-Stream Margin Review.dwgSITE PLAN L1-1 DESIGN WORKSHOP Landscape Architecture · Land Planning Urban Design · Tourism Planning Asheville · Aspen · Austin · Chicago · Denver · Dubai Houston · Lake Tahoe · Los Angeles · Shanghai 120 East Main Street (970) 925-8354 (970) 920-1387 Aspen, Colorado 81611 ASPEN, COLORADO, 8161111/21/2022 CW DB GHOST SQUARE - HORIZONTAL Project : Type:SPECIFICATION SHEET Page: 1 of 6 Due to continuous improvements, the information herein may be changed without notice 9320 Boul. St-Laurent, suite 100, Montréal (Québec) Canada H2N 1N7, P.: 514.523.1339 F.: 514.525.6107 www.sistemalux.com JP - R4 Last update: August 12, 2022 Unique lighting system for wall recessed lighting in exterior applications. The system consists of a series of concrete forming boxes designed to create a cavity in the wall during the concrete forming process. The resulting void in the wall houses the LED light module, which is concealed from view. Designed for low mounting heights with downward asymmetric light distribution. Low luminance with light source regressed inside the luminaire and shielded from all viewing angles Luminaire characteristic: Power input: 4W to 12W Lumens: up to 551lm (for 3000K, 80CRI) Luminaire efficacy: Up to 60lm/W Source: White LED module (LM-80) 3000K: 80CRI, 4000K: 80CRI. Lumen maintenance: 70% of initial lumens at 50 000 hours (L70) (LM79). Optic: Downward Asymmetric Material: Body: Die-cast Diffuser: Toughened glass Recessed housing: Polypropylene Mounting: Wall recessed cast in concrete. Supplied with a two part housing installation kit, anchor screws, bolts, locking system and adhesive template to ensure perfect alignment when installing. Connections to be done inside the back box. Electrical: See remote power supply options on page 3. Finish: Concrete Weight: 1.8 lbs (0.8 kg) to 3.97 lbs (1.8 kg). Warranty: 5 year limited warranty Rating: IP65, IK06 Certification: cULus listed for Wet location EXTERIOR LIGHTING SPECIFICATIONS EL0-1 Application An LED bollard with shielded asymmetric light distribution. Designed for effective lighting of landscapes, pathways, and open spaces. The fully shielded design provides visual comfort while illuminating ground surfaces. Provided with mounting system that allows the luminaire to be adjusted independent of anchor bolt orientation. Materials Luminaire housing constructed of die-cast and extruded marine grade, copper free (≤ 0.3% copper content) A360.0 aluminum alloy Clear safety glass Reflector made of pure anodized aluminum High temperature silicone gasket Mechanically captive stainless steel fasteners Mounting plate constructed of heavy cast aluminum NRTL listed to North American Standards, suitable for wet locations Protection class IP 65 Weight: 14.5 lbs Electrical Operating voltage 120-277V AC Minimum start temperature -30° C Maximum ambient temperature 90° C LED module wattage 11.6 W System wattage 14.5 W Controllability 0-10V Color rendering index Ra > 80 Luminaire lumens 1475 lumens (4000K) LED service life (L70) 60,000 hours LED color temperature 4000K - Product number + K4 (EXPRESS) 3500K - Product number + K35 3000K - Product number + K3 (EXPRESS) 2700K - Product number + K27 Wildlife friendly amber LED - Optional Luminaire is optionally available with a narrow bandwidth, amber LED source (585-600nm) approved by the FWC. This light output is suggested for use within close proximity to sea turtle nesting and hatching habitats. Electrical and control information may vary from standard luminaire. LED module wattage 17.6 W (Amber) System wattage 22.0W (Amber) Luminaire lumens 574 lumens (Amber) BEGA can supply you with suitable LED replacement modules for up to 20 years after the purchase of LED luminaires - see website for details Finish All BEGA standard finishes are matte, textured polyester poywder coat with minimum 3 mil thickness. Available colors Black (BLK) White (WHT) RAL: Bronze (BRZ) Silver (SLV) CUS: Shielded LED bollard - asymmetric BEGA 1000 BEGA Way, Carpinteria, CA 93013 (805) 684-0533 info@bega-us.com Due to the dynamic nature of lighting products and the associated technologies, luminaire data on this sheet is subject to change at the discretion of BEGA North America. For the most current technical data, please refer to bega-us.com © copyright BEGA 2018 Updated 10/20/20 Type: BEGA Product: Project: Modified: Shielded LED bollard · asymmetric LED A B Anchorage 99 058 11.6 W 7 1⁄2 39 3⁄8 79 817 A A B B A Mounting Accessories 79817 Anchorage Kit 70895 Direct burial anchorage Available options FSC Fusing AMB Amber LED FPRO Factory Programmed Reduced output EMPK Integral Emergency Battery Pack AWB Asymmetric Wide Beam See individual accessory spec sheet for details. X01 FULLY SHIELDED RECESSED DOWNLIGHT 2700K CCT X02 FULLY SHIELDED BOLLARD 2700K CCT X03 FULLY SHIELDED POLE TOP LUMINAIRE ON LOW WOODEN POLE 2700K CCT X04 FULLY SHIELDED WALL RECESSED STEP LIGHT 3000K CCT 7 ©2021 Tech Lighting, L.L.C. All rights reserved. The Tech Lighting logo is a registered trademark of Tech Lighting. Tech Lighting reserves the right to change specifications for product improvements without notification. ELEMENT™ 3" LED ADJUSTABLE DOWNLIGHT Description: 3" LED Module 60° Beam - 0° Tilt, 80 CRI, 3000K Model: E3 Citizen LED Input Power (Watts): 18.4 Input Power Factor: 0.98 Absolute Luminous Flux (Lumens): 1536 Lumen Efficacy (Lumens per Watt): 83.5 Description: 3" LED Module 40° Beam - 0° Tilt, 80 CRI, 3000K Model: E3 Citizen LED Input Power (Watts): 16.9 Input Power Factor: 0.98 Absolute Luminous Flux (Lumens): 1774 Lumen Efficacy (Lumens per Watt): 104.6 Output difference between CCTs ~ 5%, CRIs ~ 15%. ANGLE 0°45°90° 0°3230 3230 3230 5°3107 3126 3159 10°2824 2830 2871 15°2415 2407 2463 20°1863 1866 1937 25°1111 1125 1128 30°490 521 479 35°221 232 205 40°115 114 110 45°65 64 59 50°30 38 22 55°14 22 11 60°6 9 4 65°1 3 1 70°1 1 1 75°1 1 1 80°0 0 0 85°0 0 0 90°0 0 0 ANGLE 0°45°90° 0°2305 2305 2305 5°2313 2298 2268 10°2295 2248 2155 15°2219 2116 1938 20°1964 1876 1714 25°1548 1544 1330 30°1113 1176 1013 35°749 835 704 40°450 511 428 45°230 283 221 50°94 140 91 55°38 69 35 60°18 31 16 65°8 13 6 70°0 4 0 75°0 0 0 80°0 0 0 85°0 0 0 90°0 0 0 PHOTOMETRICS 1.7’ 3.3’ 5’ 6.7’ 0 4’ 6.7’ 8.3’ 1118fc 297fc 129fc 72fc 47fc 0 550 1100 1650 2200 2750 3300 90˚ 80˚ 70˚ 60˚ 50˚ 40˚30˚20˚10˚0˚ 0˚ 0˚45˚ 90˚45˚ 90˚ 0 396 791 1187 1584 1979 2375 90˚ 80˚ 70˚ 60˚ 50˚ 40˚30˚20˚10˚0˚ 0˚ 0˚45˚ 90˚45˚ 90˚ 2’ 4’ 6’ 0 4.1’ 8.1’ 8’ 576fc 144fc 64fc 36fc 1 ©2021 Tech Lighting, L.L.C. All rights reserved. The Tech Lighting logo is a registered trademark of Tech Lighting. Tech Lighting reserves the right to change specifications for product improvements without notification. ELEMENT™ 3" LED ADJUSTABLE DOWNLIGHT The ELEMENT 3" Next Generation Adjustable recessed downlight features full adjustability with lockable, tool-free, hot aiming. ELEMENT’s patented high/low lamp positioning allows the LED to be positioned closer to the aperture for maximum light output and efficiency or higher in the ceiling to minimize glare and flash on the trim. Options include premium Warm Dimming, Tunable White, Xicato and Xicato Artist Series LED modules. Trim options include Flanged or Flangeless and Flangeless in Wood Ceiling. • Housing reduced by 60% • Tool-free aiming/locking: 0-40° tilt, 361° rotation • Patented high/low lamp positioning • 2-step standard • Standard phase dimming down to 1% • Trims reflector options • Solite Soft Focus lens option LUMEN MULTIPLIER (CRI/CCT) CCT 80 CRI MULTIPLIER 90 CRI MULTIPLIER 2700K 0.95 0.80 3000K 1.00 0.85 3500K 1.05 0.90 Lumen output will vary by CCT and CRI. See photometric charts for output information. SPECIFICATIONS STATIC WHITE XICATO WARM DIM TUNABLE WHITE HIGH OUTPUT LOW OUTPUT STANDARD SERIES ARTIST SERIES HIGH OUTPUT LOW OUTPUT HIGH OUTPUT (5000K) HIGH OUTPUT (4000K) DELIVERED LUMENS 1800/1450 1319/1124 1129 945 1300 900 1272 1150 WATTS 17 12 15 15 17 12 18 18 EFFICACY 106/85 110/94 75 63 76 75 72 64 CRI 80+/90+80+95+90+90+ CBCP 10° - 19,414 | 18° - 5,848 25° - 5,416 | 40° - 3,230 60° - 2,305 21º - 3,184 | 43º - 2,733 | 60º - 1,014 18º - N/A | 25º - N/A | 40º - 1,622 | 60° - N/A CCT OPTIONS 2700K, 3000K or 3500K 2700K, 3000K or 3500K3 3000K - 1800K 5000K - 2700K 4000K - 1800K COLOR CONSISTENCY 2-step 1 X 2-step 3-step 2-step VOLTAGE 120V or 277V DIMMING1 Standard phase and 0-10V dimming (down to 1%) | Lutron Hi-lume EcoSystem (down to 0.1%) Lutron Hi-lume 2-Wire (down to 1%) | eldoLED 0-10V or Dali (down to 0.1%) eldoLED 0-10V or Dali (down to 0.1%) POWER SUPPLY Constant current driver with +.9 power factor and +80% efficiency OPTICS Field changeable: 10°, 18°, 25°, 40°, 60° TIR Field changeable: 21°, 43°, 60° Reflector Field changeable: 18°, 25°, 40°, 60° TIR ADJUSTABILITY Lockable, hot-aiming 0-40° tilt, 361° rotation, high/low lamp positioning, 45° collar rotation CEILING APPEARANCE Flanged, Flangeless or Flangeless in Wood Ceiling CEILING THICKNESS Flanged: Up to 2-1/2" Flangeless: No ceiling thickness limitations Flangeless in Wood Ceiling: 1/2" to 2" Note: Thicker ceilings impact light cutoff CEILING APERTURE 3-7/8 " ceiling cutout HOUSING IC Airtight, Non-IC Airtight, Chicago Plenum. IC suitable up to R60 spray foam insulation. Sauna/Steam-room use available only with combination of H Shower trim, LO Low Output housing, and I IC housing rating. CONSTRUCTION Housing: Heavy-Gauge, Cold-Rolled Steel Trim: Die-Cast Aluminum FINISH Housing: Black Powder Coat Trim: Antique Bronze, Black, Satin Nickel, White (paintable) GENERAL LISTING ETL listed. Damp listed. Shower version Wet listed. CALIFORNIA TITLE 24 Registered CEC Appliance Database. Can be used to comply with CEC 2019 Title 24 part 6 (JA8-2016, JA8-2019) (for 90 CRI versions). L70 50,000 hours min WARRANTY2 5 years Data in chart reflect 3000K/80 CRI values unless noted. Custom Output/Custom RAL/Custom CCT available, Contact Quotes Department Ordering grids available on page 2. Accepts two optical controls and an optional trim-mounted lens. 1See ELEMENT-Lighting.com for dimmer compatibility. 2Visit ELEMENT-Lighting.com for specific warranty limitations and details. 33500K Xicato module not available for Artist series. SHOWN IN FLANGELESS BEVEL SQUARE UPDATED 7/2/21 3 ©2021 Tech Lighting, L.L.C. All rights reserved. The Tech Lighting logo is a registered trademark of Tech Lighting. Tech Lighting reserves the right to change specifications for product improvements without notification. ELEMENT™ 3" LED ADJUSTABLE DOWNLIGHT IC AIRTIGHT / NON-IC AIRTIGHT / CHICAGO PLENUM EMERGENCY BATTERY (NON-IC AIRTIGHT / CHICAGO PLENUM) HOUSING 20.5" 521 mm 10.6" 269 mm11.5" 292 mm 6" 152 mm 9.5" 241 mm 12.5" 318 mm 5.2" 132 mm 4" 102 mm COLLAR HEIGHT 0.75" (19 MM) (SEE INSTRUCTIONS FOR CEILING THICKNESS < 0.75") COLLAR HEIGHT 0.75" (19 MM) (SEE INSTRUCTIONS FOR CEILING THICKNESS < 0.75") TRIMS ROUND BEVEL SQUARE BEVELROUND BEVEL ROUND FLATROUND FLAT SQUARE BEVEL SQUARE FLATSQUARE FLAT ROUND WALL WASH SQUARE WALL WASH ROUND WALL WASH SQUARE WALL WASH FLANGED FLANGELESS 3.2" 81 mm 43 mm 1.7" 3.2" 81 mm 43 mm 1.7" 3.2" 81 mm 43 mm 1.7" 43 mm 1.7" 4.3" 10 9 mm 3.2" 81 mm 43 mm 1.7" 4.3" 109 mm 43 mm 1.7" 43 mm 1.7" 4.3" 109 mm 3.2" 81 mm 4.3" 109 mm 43 mm 1.7" 3.2" 81 mm 3.2" 81 mm 69 mm 2.7" 4.3" 109 mm 69 mm 2.7" 3.2" 81 mm ROUND BEVEL (ANTIQUE BRONZE) ROUND FLAT (ANTIQUE BRONZE) 3.2" 81 mm 43 mm 1.7" 3.2" 81 mm 43 mm 1.7" 3.2" 81 mm 43 mm 1.7" 3.2" 81 mm 43 mm 1.7" FINISH ANTIQUEBRONZE BLACK SATIN NICKEL WHITE(PAINTABLE) SQUARE BEVEL (SATIN NICKEL) SQUARE FLAT (SATIN NICKEL) FLANGELESS IN WOOD CEILING ROUND WALL WASH (ANTIQUE BRONZE) SQUARE WALL WASH (SATIN NICKEL) 3.2" 81 mm 69 mm 2.7" 53 mm 2.1" 3.2" 81 mm 4.3" 109 mm 3.2" 81 mm 53 mm 2.1" 3.2" 81 mm 53 mm 2.1" LENS OPTION SHOWN WITH AND WITHOUT A LENS (SQUARE FLANGED BEVEL) SHOWN WITH AND WITHOUT A LENS (ROUND FLANGELESS BEVEL) Application BEGA wooden poles soften the built environment by using natural materials of the highest quality. Compatible with pole top luminaires that slip fit 3in. O.D. tenon. Materials Glue-laminated, Scots pine hardwood (<10% sapwood) All timber sourced from FSC or PEFC sustainably managed forests, minimum 80 year growth and 250mm diameter trees Fumigation and anti-termite treated Water based wood stain High-temperature glue used for lamination Base and anchorage constructed of steel 316 grade stainless steel screws CE Certified, certificate 0679-CPR-0473 Weight: 42 lbs. Wood Finish All poles are finished smooth with three coats of wood stain to both color and protect the wood, optionally available with a brushed finish. BEGA can supply you with wood stain for maintenance up to 20 years after purchase. Available colors Brume Chestnut Tyrol Pine Ferrare Oak Copper Rustic (brushed) Light Mineral Dark Mineral Original Mineral Metal Finish All BEGA standard paint finishes are matte, textured polyester powder coat with minimum 3 mil thickness. Available colors Black (BLK) Bronze (BRZ) Silver (SLV) RAL: CUS: Disclaimer BEGA North America warrants the specific anchor bolts and pole combination according to the product number(s) and description(s) indicated on this submittal sheet. Structural changes to the pole requested by the customer, including changes to pole length, may affect the compatibility of the anchor bolts and corresponding poles. BEGA North America is not responsible for the incompatibility of the anchor bolts and poles resulting from such structural changes without review by the BEGA North America engineering department. This includes, but is not limited to, any labor charges, charges for replacement materials and shipping. Wooden pole - Round tapered Note: Data above assumes grade level installation and a maximum luminaire weight of 50 lbs. BEGA 1000 BEGA Way, Carpinteria, CA 93013 (805) 684-0533 info@bega-us.com Due to the dynamic nature of lighting products and the associated technologies, luminaire data on this sheet is subject to change at the discretion of BEGA North America. For the most current technical data, please refer to bega-us.com © copyright BEGA 2018 Updated 06/06/19 Type: BEGA Product: Project: Modified: Luminaire: Luminaire EPA: Wooden pole · Round tapered H a b c d1 d 2 Anchorage 98 500 122 3 393⁄8 15 3 4 1⁄2 79 826 Pole wind load rating MPH 70 80 90 100 120 EPA 25.3 19.1 14.7 11.6 7.6 a d2 Round Tapered Squa d2 H d1 b c d1 Type: BEGA Product: Project: Voltage: Color: Options: Modified: Surface washers · asymmetrical light distribution Pole mounted · asymetrical Lamp A B C Anchorage 99 868 15.6W LED 10 1⁄4 981⁄2 121⁄2 79 818 Post construction: One piece extruded aluminum, 1⁄8" wall thickness internally welded to a die-cast base plate cover. Enclosure: One piece die-cast aluminum housing connected to the post/pole by a two piece, die-cast aluminum knuckle. The knuckle has infinite adjustability from 0° to 90° and is secured by one stainless steel fastener. Fully gasketed using a one piece molded high temperature silicone gasket and provided with a pure anodized matte aluminum reflector. Molded 1⁄4" thick etched tempered glass secured by a one piece die-cast aluminum frame secured to the housing with four stainless steel captive fasteners. Die castings are marine grade, copper free (≤ 0.3% copper content) A360.0 aluminum alloy. Electrical: 15.6W LED luminaire, 18 total system watts, -30°C start temperature. Integral 120V through 277V electronic LED driver, 0-10V dimming. LED module(s) are available from factory for easy replacement. Standard LED color temperature is 3000K with an 85 CRI. Available in 4000K (85 CRI); add suffix K4 to order. Anchor base: Pole Mount; Mounts to #79818 anchorage kit (supplied). Finish: All BEGA standard finishes are polyester powder coat with minimum 3 mil thickness. Available in four standard BEGA colors: Black (BLK); White (WHT); Bronze (BRZ); Silver (SLV). To specify, add appropriate suffix to catalog number. Custom colors supplied on special order. CSA certified to U.S. and Canadian standards, suitable for wet locations. Protection class IP65 Weight: 34.3 lbs. EPA (Effective projection area): 0.81 sq. ft. Luminaire Lumens: 1754 B C C A B A BEGA 1000 BEGA Way, Carpinteria, CA 93013 (805) 684-0533 FAX (805) 566 -9474 www .bega -us .com ©copyright BEGA 2019 Updated 01/19 GHOST SQUARE - HORIZONTAL Project : Type:SPECIFICATION SHEET Page: 5 of 6 Due to continuous improvements, the information herein may be changed without notice 9320 Boul. St-Laurent, suite 100, Montréal (Québec) Canada H2N 1N7, P.: 514.523.1339 F.: 514.525.6107 www.sistemalux.com JP - R4 Last update: August 12, 2022 PHOTOMETRIC DATA Visit sistemalux.com for complete photometric data. GHOST SQUARE SMALL Asymmetric (3000K, 80 CRI) CCT (K) CRI OPTIC 3000K LOAD (W) 4W80 LUMENS (lm) 240 EFFICACY (lm / W) 60 MAX CANDELA (cd) MODEL 113Asymmetric SGHO-SQS-830 *USE MULTIPLIER TABLE FOR OTHER CCT AND CRI OUTPUT DATA 90° 50° 70° 30° 10° 20 40 60 80 100 120 -0° H -90° H CD 0 5 fc 2 fc 0.5 fc Mounting Height: 2ft Grid scale: 1:2ft0,25 fc 1 fc 0 1 2 3 4 1 2 3 4 3 2 1 0 1 2 3 4 CCT options CRI options Multiplier 300K 80CRI 1 4000K 80CRI 1.08 GHOST SQUARE MEDIUM Asymmetric (3000K, 80 CRI) CCT (K) CRI OPTIC 3000K LOAD (W) 6W80 LUMENS (lm) 269 EFFICACY (lm / W) 44 MAX CANDELA (cd) MODEL 119Asymmetric SGHO-SQM-830 *USE MULTIPLIER TABLE FOR OTHER CCT AND CRI OUTPUT DATA 90° 50° 70° 30° 10° 20 40 60 80 100 120 -0° H -90° H CD 0 5 fc 2 fc 0.5 fc Mounting Height: 2ft Grid scale: 1:2ft0,25 fc 1 fc 0 1 2 3 4 1 2 3 4 3 2 1 0 1 2 3 4 CCT options CRI options Multiplier 300K 80CRI 1 4000K 80CRI 1.08 76 C DATE#DESCRIPTION ISSUE DATE: SHEET NUMBER REVIEWED: PROJECT NUMBER: DRAWN: REVISIONS 6905ESKENAZI RESIDENCELOT 11, CALLAHAN SUBDIVISION C O P Y R I G H T D E S I G N W O R K S H O P, I N C. STREAM MARGIN REVIEW W W W . D E S I G N W O R K S H O P . C O M Dec 06, 2022 - 11:13pmC:\Users\DBagnasco\appdata\local\temp\AcPublish_21756\dw-6905-Stream Margin Review.dwgSITE PLAN L1-1 DESIGN WORKSHOP Landscape Architecture · Land Planning Urban Design · Tourism Planning Asheville · Aspen · Austin · Chicago · Denver · Dubai Houston · Lake Tahoe · Los Angeles · Shanghai 120 East Main Street (970) 925-8354 (970) 920-1387 Aspen, Colorado 81611 ASPEN, COLORADO, 8161111/21/2022 CW DB X05 FULLY SHIELDED TREE MOUNTED CYLINDER DOWNLIGHT 2700K CCT Application This LED wall mounted luminaire has light output in one direction. Arranged individually or in groups, it is a great design element for a host of lighting applications. Downward orientation only. Materials Luminaire housing and constructed of die-cast marine grade, copper free (≤ 0.3% copper content) A360.0 aluminum alloy Matte safety glass High temperature silicone gasket Mechanically captive stainless steel fasteners NRTL listed to North American Standards, suitable for wet locations Protection class IP 65 Weight: 3.1 lbs Electrical Operating voltage     120-277V AC Minimum start temperature   -20° C LED module wattage   7.7 W System wattage     10 W  Controllability     0-10V dimmable Color rendering index   Ra > 80 Luminaire lumens     464 lumens (3000K) LED service life (L70)   60,000 hours LED color temperature  4000K - Product number + K4 (EXPRESS)  3500K - Product number + K35  3000K - Product number + K3 (EXPRESS)  2700K - Product number + K27  Amber - Product number + AMB Wildlife friendly amber LED - Optional Luminaire is optionally available with a narrow bandwidth, amber LED source (585-600nm) approved by the FWC. This light output is suggested  for use within close proximity to sea turtle nesting and hatching habitats.  Electrical and control information may vary from standard luminaire. LED module wattage   6.0 W (Amber) System wattage     10.3 W (Amber) Luminaire lumens     101 lumens (Amber) BEGA can supply you with suitable LED replacement modules for up to 20 years after the purchase of LED luminaires - see website for details Finish All BEGA standard finishes are matte, textured polyester powder coat with  minimum 3 mil thickness. Available colors  Black (BLK)   White (WHT)  RAL:   Bronze (BRZ)    Silver (SLV)  CUS: LED wall luminaire - light output on one side BEGA 1000 BEGA Way, Carpinteria, CA 93013 (805) 684-0533 info@bega-us.com Due to the dynamic nature of lighting products and the associated technologies, luminaire data on this sheet is subject to change at the discretion of BEGA North America. For the most current technical data, please refer to bega-us.com © copyright BEGA 2018 Updated 03/19/19 Type: BEGA Product: Project: Modified: LED wall luminaire · light output on one side LED A B C 22 359 7.7 W 8 1⁄2 4 3⁄8 4 A B C SMALLER SIZE, MORE FLEXIBILITY Up to eight inches shorter than our previous models, HydroCool™ lights are only 4½" (6W) or 5½" (12W and 24W) in length to fit even the narrowest walls for ultimate design flexibility. MULTI-COLOR AND WHITE LIGHT OPTIONS Color options for use with all major automation systems. In addition to Daylight White (5000K), Warm White (2700K) lights provide incandescent- like lighting and meet Dark Sky Community requirements. Technical Details INCLUDED ACCESSORIES Every light includes a construction cover, robust installation tool and white and gray cosmetic trim rings. P-Series White Cosmetic Trim Ring Gray Cosmetic Trim Ring Construction Cover H-Series Jandy® WaterColors S-Series Warm White Daylight White USA Jandy.com | 1.800.822.7933 Canada Jandy.ca | 1.888.647.4004 ©2018 Zodiac Pool Systems LLC. ZODIAC® is a registered trademark of Zodiac International, S.A.S.U., used under license. All other trademarks used herein are the property of their respective owners. 3367 Installation Tool WATTAGE SELECTOR GUIDE POOL FINISH ILLUMINATION DISTANCE RECOMMENDED POWER Color Lights n n n n White Lights n n (Watts) Light Up to 12 ft Up to 16 ft 6 12 – 20 ft 16 – 24 ft 12 20 ft +24 ft +24 Medium Up to 10 ft Up to 14 ft 6 10 – 16 ft 14 – 22 ft 12 16 ft +22 ft +24 Dark Up to 8 ft Up to 12 ft 6 8 – 12 ft 12 – 20 ft 12 12 ft +20 ft +24 Visit Jandy.com for part numbers and full list of available models Previous ModelsNew HydroCool Light 9 IN. X06 IN-POOL RECESSED LUMINAIRE 2700K CCT X07 FULLY SHIELDED WALL MOUNTED LUMINAIRE 2700K CCT EXTERIOR LIGHTING SPECIFICATIONS EL0-2 BEACHSIDE LIGHTING • 800-405-6732 • www.BeachsideLighting.com • Made in Hawaii, USA L-011-H 01/2022 Project By Date For ordering purposes, please specify (example: L-011-H―5W-NFL-27―TDM2-72―HL1) Fixture Accessory(ies) L-011-H Lamp TDM2 Mounting Accessory (optional) MOUNTING EXAMPLE: TDM2 strapped to tree branch 4.2" [10.6cm] Ø2.4" [6.0cm] 5.2" [13.1cm] IP 66CSA Listed, file # 19003010 year fixture warranty3 year warranty for MR16 lamps Weight: 1.3 lbs / 0.6 kg Finish: Unfinished is standard; no specification required. The fixture will weather to a natural patina. The patina process is natural with brass and copper. Rate of patina and eventual color is dependent upon climate and proximity to the ocean. Thus, Beachside does not guarantee any specific appearance. Lamps __ FR __ HL1 __ KP __ PR __ RT __ SL 12 Volts AC/DC. Remote transformer required. Tempered soda lime glass. All brass components. 0.140” [3.6mm] thick brass housing. The L-011-H is a cylindrical, hanging downlight made from solid brass. Construction Lens Voltage Mounting Accessories Frosted lens Honeycomb louver, 1/8” [3mm] thick Extended snoot Prismatic spread lens Rectilinear lens Solite lens Optical Accessories Mounting Supplied with 20” stainless steel cable, 36” lead wire, and 1/2” male fitting for mounting accessory. Or the cable can be removed and the fixture hung directly by its loop. __ CMK __ TDM1 __ TDM2-__ __ TDM2SS-__ __ TDM3-HANG __ TDM4-HANG __ TMJB-__ __ TMJBX Catenary cable mounting kit Brass tree/deck mount with stainless steel screws Brass tree mount with nylon strap (48, 72, or 96”) Brass tree mount with stainless steel strap (48, 72, or 96”) Brass low-profile deck/wall mount—for hanging fixtures Brass low-profile tree mount with notch for wire—for hanging fixtures Brass tree-mounted junction box, single fixture mount, stainless steel strap (48, 72, or 96”) Brass tree-mounted junction box, single fixture mount, stainless steel screws GU5.3 MR16 LED • Amber (1500K), Warm White (2700K/3000K) Most lamps dim to less than 20%. See lamp manufacturer’s transformer/dimmer compatibility chart. 320 lm 320 lm 320 lm 320 lm 320 lm 600 lm 630 lm 630 lm __ 5W-A-NFL AMBER (1500K) __ 5W-SP-27 __ 5W-NFL-27 __ 5W-FL-27 __ 5W-FL/60-27 __ 5W-WFL-27 15° spot 25° narrow flood 40° flood 60° flood 100° wide flood 5 Watt Cree chipset Soraa chipset 8 Watts __ 7W-FL/60-27 60° flood __ 8W-SP-27 __ 8W-NFL-27 __ 8W-FL-27 10° spot 25° narrow flood 36° flood Cree chipset 5 Watts Lumiled chipset7 Watts 2700K 3000K __ 5W-SP-30 __ 5W-NFL-30 __ 5W-FL-30 __ 5W-FL/60-30 __ 5W-WFL-30 __ 7W-FL/60-30 __ 8W-SP-30 __ 8W-NFL-30 __ 8W-FL-30 483 lm 25° narrow flood 83 lm 85+ CRI 85+ CRI 85+ CRI 85+ CRI 85+ CRI 90 CRI 90 CRI 90 CRI 90+ CRI SUITABLE FOR INDOOR USE (halogen 20W max) L-011-H L-011-H with KP accessory 77 Crystal Lake RoadexisƟ ng conditions aspen | coloradoExhibit A1178 Exhibit A12 #tbd Crystal Lake Road Lot 11; Callahan Subdivision – Vicinity Map 79 City of Aspen|130 S. Galena St.|(970) 920 5090 April 2020 LAND USE APPLICATION APPLICANT: REPRESENTIVATIVE: Description: Existing and Proposed Conditions Review: Administrative or Board Review Required Land Use Review(s): Growth Management Quota System (GMQS) required fields: Net Leasable square footage Lodge Pillows Free Market dwelling units Affordable Housing dwelling units Essential Public Facility square footage Have you included the following? FEES DUE: $ Pre-Application Conference Summary Signed Fee Agreement HOA Compliance form All items listed in checklist on PreApplication Conference Summary Name: Address: Phone#: email: Address: Phone #: email: Name: Project Name and Address: Parcel ID # (REQUIRED) #tbd Crystal Lake Road; Aspen, CO 81611 2737-181-32-011 Callahan Crystal Lake LLC, an Indiana limited liability company 10689 N Pennsylvania St #100 Indianapolis, IN 46280 dneskenazi@sandordev.com BendonAdams 300So. Spring St. #202; Aspen, CO 81611 970.925.2855 Chris@BendonAdams.com Existing 1.1 ac. vacant lot. Proposed development of a single- family home na na na na 1 (existing dev. right) x x x x $1,625 (admin) or $3,575 (P&Z) 317.258.0759 Exhibit B1CITY OF ASPEN COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT 80 Exhibit B2 81 Exhibit B3 82 83 Land Title Guarantee Company Customer Distribution PREVENT FRAUD - Please remember to call a member of our closing team when initiating a wire transfer or providing wiring instructions. Order Number:Q62014835 Date: 12/07/2022 Property Address:CRYSTAL LAKE RD, ASPEN, CO 81611 PLEASE CONTACT YOUR CLOSER OR CLOSER'S ASSISTANT FOR WIRE TRANSFER INSTRUCTIONS For Closing Assistance For Title Assistance Land Title Roaring Fork Valley Title Team 533 E HOPKINS #102 ASPEN, CO 81611 (970) 927-0405 (Work) (970) 925-0610 (Work Fax) valleyresponse@ltgc.com Seller/Owner CALLAHAN CRYSTAL LAKE LLC Delivered via: No Commitment Delivery Agent for Seller BENDONADAMS Attention: CHRIS BENDON 300 S SPRING STREET SUITE 202 ASPEN, CO 81611 (970) 925-2855 (Work) chris@bendonadams.com Delivered via: Electronic Mail Exhibit B4 84 Land Title Guarantee Company Estimate of Title Fees Order Number:Q62014835 Date: 12/07/2022 Property Address:CRYSTAL LAKE RD, ASPEN, CO 81611 Parties: CALLAHAN CRYSTAL LAKE LLC, AN INDIANA LIMITED LIABILITY COMPANY Visit Land Title's Website at www.ltgc.com for directions to any of our offices. Estimate of Title insurance Fees "TBD" Commitment $265.00 Total $265.00 If Land Title Guarantee Company will be closing this transaction, the fees listed above will be collected at closing. Thank you for your order! Note: The documents linked in this commitment should be reviewed carefully. These documents, such as covenants conditions and restrictions, may affect the title, ownership and use of the property. You may wish to engage legal assistance in order to fully understand and be aware of the implications of the effect of these documents on your property. Chain of Title Documents: Pitkin county recorded 09/20/2021 under reception no. 680703 Plat Map(s): Pitkin county recorded 05/19/1976 at book 5 page 7 Pitkin county recorded 08/19/1977 at book 6 page 16 Pitkin county recorded 10/04/1982 at book 13 page 92 85 Copyright 2006-2022 American Land Title Association. All rights reserved. The use of this Form is restricted to ALTA licensees and ALTA members in good standing as of the date of use. All other uses are prohibited. Reprinted under license from the American Land Title Association. Property Address: CRYSTAL LAKE RD, ASPEN, CO 81611 1.Effective Date: 11/23/2022 at 5:00 P.M. 2.Policy to be Issued and Proposed Insured: "TBD" Commitment Proposed Insured: $0.00 3.The estate or interest in the land described or referred to in this Commitment and covered herein is: A FEE SIMPLE 4.Title to the estate or interest covered herein is at the effective date hereof vested in: CALLAHAN CRYSTAL LAKE LLC, AN INDIANA LIMITED LIABILITY COMPANY 5.The Land referred to in this Commitment is described as follows: LOT 11,​ CALLAHAN SUBDIVISION,​ ACCORDING TO THE SECOND AMENDED PLAT RECORDED OCTOBER 4, 1982 IN PLAT BOOK 13 AT PAGE 92 AS RECEPTION NO. 244589.​ COUNTY OF PITKIN,​ STATE OF COLORADO. ALTA COMMITMENT Old Republic National Title Insurance Company Schedule A Order Number:Q62014835 86 ALTA COMMITMENT Old Republic National Title Insurance Company Schedule B, Part I (Requirements) Order Number: Q62014835 All of the following Requirements must be met: This proposed Insured must notify the Company in writing of the name of any party not referred to in this Commitment who will obtain an interest in the Land or who will make a loan on the Land. The Company may then make additional Requirements or Exceptions. Pay the agreed amount for the estate or interest to be insured. Pay the premiums, fees, and charges for the Policy to the Company. Documents satisfactory to the Company that convey the Title or create the Mortgage to be insured, or both, must be properly authorized, executed, delivered, and recorded in the Public Records. THIS COMMITMENT IS FOR INFORMATION ONLY, AND NO POLICY WILL BE ISSUED PURSUANT HERETO. 87 This commitment does not republish any covenants, condition, restriction, or limitation contained in any document referred to in this commitment to the extent that the specific covenant, conditions, restriction, or limitation violates state or federal law based on race, color, religion, sex, sexual orientation, gender identity, handicap, familial status, or national origin. 1.Any facts, rights, interests, or claims thereof, not shown by the Public Records but that could be ascertained by an inspection of the Land or that may be asserted by persons in possession of the Land. 2.Easements, liens or encumbrances, or claims thereof, not shown by the Public Records. 3.Any encroachment, encumbrance, violation, variation, or adverse circumstance affecting the Title that would be disclosed by an accurate and complete land survey of the Land and not shown by the Public Records. 4.Any lien, or right to a lien, for services, labor or material heretofore or hereafter furnished, imposed by law and not shown by the Public Records. 5.Defects, liens, encumbrances, adverse claims or other matters, if any, created, first appearing in the public records or attaching subsequent to the effective date hereof but prior to the date of the proposed insured acquires of record for value the estate or interest or mortgage thereon covered by this Commitment. 6.(a) Taxes or assessments that are not shown as existing liens by the records of any taxing authority that levies taxes or assessments on real property or by the Public Records; (b) proceedings by a public agency that may result in taxes or assessments, or notices of such proceedings, whether or not shown by the records of such agency or by the Public Records. 7.(a) Unpatented mining claims; (b) reservations or exceptions in patents or in Acts authorizing the issuance thereof; (c) water rights, claims or title to water. 8.RIGHT OF THE PROPRIETOR OF A VEIN OR LODE TO EXTRACT AND REMOVE HIS ORE THEREFROM, SHOULD THE SAME BE FOUND TO PENETRATE OR INTERSECT THE PREMISES HEREBY GRANTED, AND A RIGHT OF WAY FOR DITCHES OR CANALS CONSTRUCTED BY THE AUTHORITY OF THE UNITED STATES, AS RESERVED IN UNITED STATES PATENT RECORDED JUNE 17, 1894 IN BOOK 175 AT PAGE 246. 9.TERMS, CONDITIONS, PROVISIONS AND OBLIGATIONS OF RIGHT OF WAY FOR PIPELINE FLUME, DITCH OR WATERWAY AS SET FORTH IN INSTRUMENT RECORDED JANUARY 30, 1893 IN BOOK 93 AT PAGE 527. 10.TERMS, CONDITIONS, PROVISIONS AND OBLIGATIONS OF EASEMENT FOR A TRAIL RECORDED SEPTEMBER 25, 1975 IN BOOK 303 AT PAGE 452 AND AS MODIFIED BY INSTRUMENT RECORDED JULY 29, 1977 IN BOOK 332 AT PAGE 540. 11.EASEMENTS, CONDITIONS, COVENANTS, RESTRICTIONS, RESERVATIONS AND NOTES ON THE PLAT OF CALLAHAN SUBDIVISION RECORDED MAY 19, 1976 IN PLAT BOOK 5 AT PAGE 7 AND FIRST AMENDMENT THERETO RECORDED AUGUST 17, 1977 IN PLAT BOOK 6 AT PAGE 16 AND SECOND AMENDMENT THERETO RECORDED OCTOBER 4, 1982 IN PLAT BOOK 13 AT PAGE 92. ALTA COMMITMENT Old Republic National Title Insurance Company Schedule B, Part II (Exceptions) Order Number: Q62014835 88 12.TERMS, CONDITIONS, PROVISIONS AND OBLIGATIONS AS SET FORTH IN SUBDIVISION AND PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT FOR CALLAHAN SUBDIVISION RECORDED MAY 19, 1976 IN BOOK 312 AT PAGE 110 AND NOTICE RECORDED APRIL 29, 1977 IN BOOK 328 AT PAGE 79. 13.TERMS, CONDITIONS, PROVISIONS AND OBLIGATIONS OF EASEMENT AGREEMENT RECORDED MAY 19, 1976 IN BOOK 312 AT PAGE 158 AND MUTUAL INDEMNITY AGREEMENT RECORDED MAY 19, 1976 IN BOOK 312 AT PAGE 165. 14.TERMS, CONDITIONS, PROVISIONS AND OBLIGATIONS OF RECIPROCAL EASEMENT GRANT RECORDED MAY 19, 1976 IN BOOK 312 AT PAGE 196. 15.TERMS, CONDITIONS, PROVISIONS AND OBLIGATIONS OF ORDINANCE FROM THE CITY OF ASPEN, NO. 43, SERIES OF 1982 RECORDED OCTOBER 4, 1982 IN BOOK 433 AT PAGE 561. 16.TERMS, CONDITIONS, PROVISIONS AND OBLIGATIONS OF ORDINANCE FROM THE CITY OF ASPEN, NO. 44, SERIES OF 1982 RECORDED OCTOBER 4, 1982 IN BOOK 433 AT PAGE 566. 17.TERMS, CONDITIONS, PROVISIONS AND OBLIGATIONS OF VACATION OF EASEMENT RECORDED OCTOBER 15, 1982 IN BOOK 434 AT PAGE 66. 18.TERMS, CONDITIONS, PROVISIONS AND OBLIGATIONS OF RESTRICTION RECORDED OCTOBER 15, 1982 IN BOOK 434 AT PAGE 68. 19.TERMS, CONDITIONS, PROVISIONS AND OBLIGATIONS AS SET FORTH IN RESOLUTION NO. 08, SERIES OF 2021 OF THE ASPEN PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION RECORDED JULY 23, 2021 AS RECEPTION NO. 678762. 20.ANY QUESTION, DISPUTE OR ADVERSE CLAIMS AS TO ANY LOSS OR GAIN OF LAND AS A RESULT OF ANY CHANGE IN THE RIVER BED LOCATION BY NATURAL OR OTHER THAN NATURAL CAUSES, OR ALTERATION THROUGH ANY CAUSE, NATURAL OR UNNATURAL, OF THE CENTER THREAD, BANK, CHANNEL OR FLOW OF WATERS IN THE ROARING FORK RIVER LYING WITHIN SUBJECT LAND; AND ANY QUESTION AS TO THE LOCATION OF SUCH CENTER THREAD, BED, BANK OR CHANNEL AS A LEGAL DESCRIPTION MONUMENT OR MARKER FOR PURPOSES OF DESCRIBING OR LOCATING SUBJECT LANDS. 21.ANY RIGHTS, INTERESTS OR EASEMENTS IN FAVOR OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, THE STATE OF COLORADO, OR THE PUBLIC, WHICH EXIST OR ARE CLAIMED TO EXIST IN AND OVER THE PAST AND PRESENT BED, BANKS OR WATERS OF ROARING FORK RIVER. 22.CLAIMS OF RIGHT, TITLE AND/OR INTEREST IN THE PROPERTY BETWEEN THE BOUNDARY LINE AND THE FENCE AS DEPICTED ON THE SURVEY PREPARED BY TRUE NORTH COLORADO, JOB NO. 2020- 240 WHETHER SAID CLAIMS ARISE BY ABANDONMENT, ADVERSE POSSESSION OR OTHER MEANS. SAID DOCUMENT STORE AS OUR ESI 39832609 23.ANY FACTS, RIGHTS, INTERESTS OR CLAIMS WHICH MAY EXIST OR ARISE BY REASON OF THE FOLLOWING FACTS SHOWN ON IMPROVEMENT AND TOPOGRAPHIC SURVEY CERTIFIED JULY 11, 2020 AND REVISED JUNE 29, 2021 PREPARED BY TRUE NORTH COLORADO LLC, JOB NO. 2020-240, OUR ESI 39832609: LOCATION OF GAS AND UNDERGROUND UTILITY LINES ALTA COMMITMENT Old Republic National Title Insurance Company Schedule B, Part II (Exceptions) Order Number: Q62014835 89 24.EASEMENTS, NOTES, RIGHTS OF WAY AND ALL MATTERS AS SHOWN ON STREAM MARGIN MAP RECORDED SEPTEMBER 27, 2021 IN PLAT BOOK 131 AT PAGE 40. ALTA COMMITMENT Old Republic National Title Insurance Company Schedule B, Part II (Exceptions) Order Number: Q62014835 90 LAND TITLE GUARANTEE COMPANY DISCLOSURE STATEMENTS Note: Pursuant to CRS 10-11-122, notice is hereby given that: Note: Effective September 1, 1997, CRS 30-10-406 requires that all documents received for recording or filing in the clerk and recorder's office shall contain a top margin of at least one inch and a left, right and bottom margin of at least one half of an inch. The clerk and recorder may refuse to record or file any document that does not conform, except that, the requirement for the top margin shall not apply to documents using forms on which space is provided for recording or filing information at the top margin of the document. Note: Colorado Division of Insurance Regulations 8-1-2 requires that "Every title entity shall be responsible for all matters which appear of record prior to the time of recording whenever the title entity conducts the closing and is responsible for recording or filing of legal documents resulting from the transaction which was closed". Provided that Land Title Guarantee Company conducts the closing of the insured transaction and is responsible for recording the legal documents from the transaction, exception number 5 will not appear on the Owner's Title Policy and the Lenders Policy when issued. Note: Affirmative mechanic's lien protection for the Owner may be available (typically by deletion of Exception no. 4 of Schedule B, Section 2 of the Commitment from the Owner's Policy to be issued) upon compliance with the following conditions: No coverage will be given under any circumstances for labor or material for which the insured has contracted for or agreed to pay. The Subject real property may be located in a special taxing district.(A) A certificate of taxes due listing each taxing jurisdiction will be obtained from the county treasurer of the county in which the real property is located or that county treasurer's authorized agent unless the proposed insured provides written instructions to the contrary. (for an Owner's Policy of Title Insurance pertaining to a sale of residential real property). (B) The information regarding special districts and the boundaries of such districts may be obtained from the Board of County Commissioners, the County Clerk and Recorder, or the County Assessor. (C) The land described in Schedule A of this commitment must be a single family residence which includes a condominium or townhouse unit. (A) No labor or materials have been furnished by mechanics or material-men for purposes of construction on the land described in Schedule A of this Commitment within the past 6 months. (B) The Company must receive an appropriate affidavit indemnifying the Company against un-filed mechanic's and material-men's liens. (C) The Company must receive payment of the appropriate premium.(D) If there has been construction, improvements or major repairs undertaken on the property to be purchased within six months prior to the Date of Commitment, the requirements to obtain coverage for unrecorded liens will include: disclosure of certain construction information; financial information as to the seller, the builder and or the contractor; payment of the appropriate premium fully executed Indemnity Agreements satisfactory to the company, and, any additional requirements as may be necessary after an examination of the aforesaid information by the Company. (E) 91 Note: Pursuant to CRS 10-11-123, notice is hereby given: This notice applies to owner's policy commitments disclosing that a mineral estate has been severed from the surface estate, in Schedule B-2. Note: Pursuant to CRS 10-1-128(6)(a), It is unlawful to knowingly provide false, incomplete, or misleading facts or information to an insurance company for the purpose of defrauding or attempting to defraud the company. Penalties may include imprisonment, fines, denial of insurance, and civil damages. Any insurance company or agent of an insurance company who knowingly provides false, incomplete, or misleading facts or information to a policyholder or claimant for the purpose of defrauding or attempting to defraud the policyholder or claimant with regard to a settlement or award payable from insurance proceeds shall be reported to the Colorado Division of Insurance within the Department of Regulatory Agencies. Note: Pursuant to Colorado Division of Insurance Regulations 8-1-3, notice is hereby given of the availability of a closing protection letter for the lender, purchaser, lessee or seller in connection with this transaction. Note: Pursuant to CRS 10-1-11(4)(a)(1), Colorado notaries may remotely notarize real estate deeds and other documents using real-time audio-video communication technology. You may choose not to use remote notarization for any document. That there is recorded evidence that a mineral estate has been severed, leased, or otherwise conveyed from the surface estate and that there is substantial likelihood that a third party holds some or all interest in oil, gas, other minerals, or geothermal energy in the property; and (A) That such mineral estate may include the right to enter and use the property without the surface owner's permission. (B) 92 JOINT NOTICE OF PRIVACY POLICY OF LAND TITLE GUARANTEE COMPANY, LAND TITLE GUARANTEE COMPANY OF SUMMIT COUNTY LAND TITLE INSURANCE CORPORATION AND OLD REPUBLIC NATIONAL TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY This Statement is provided to you as a customer of Land Title Guarantee Company as agent for Land Title Insurance Corporation and Old Republic National Title Insurance Company. We want you to know that we recognize and respect your privacy expectations and the requirements of federal and state privacy laws. Information security is one of our highest priorities. We recognize that maintaining your trust and confidence is the bedrock of our business. We maintain and regularly review internal and external safeguards against unauthorized access to your non-public personal information ("Personal Information"). In the course of our business, we may collect Personal Information about you from: applications or other forms we receive from you, including communications sent through TMX, our web-based transaction management system; your transactions with, or from the services being performed by us, our affiliates, or others; a consumer reporting agency, if such information is provided to us in connection with your transaction; and The public records maintained by governmental entities that we obtain either directly from those entities, or from our affiliates and non-affiliates. Our policies regarding the protection of the confidentiality and security of your Personal Information are as follows: We restrict access to all Personal Information about you to those employees who need to know that information in order to provide products and services to you. We may share your Personal Information with affiliated contractors or service providers who provide services in the course of our business, but only to the extent necessary for these providers to perform their services and to provide these services to you as may be required by your transaction. We maintain physical, electronic and procedural safeguards that comply with federal standards to protect your Personal Information from unauthorized access or intrusion. Employees who violate our strict policies and procedures regarding privacy are subject to disciplinary action. We regularly assess security standards and procedures to protect against unauthorized access to Personal Information. WE DO NOT DISCLOSE ANY PERSONAL INFORMATION ABOUT YOU WITH ANYONE FOR ANY PURPOSE THAT IS NOT STATED ABOVE OR PERMITTED BY LAW. Consistent with applicable privacy laws, there are some situations in which Personal Information may be disclosed. We may disclose your Personal Information when you direct or give us permission; when we are required by law to do so, for example, if we are served a subpoena; or when we suspect fraudulent or criminal activities. We also may disclose your Personal Information when otherwise permitted by applicable privacy laws such as, for example, when disclosure is needed to enforce our rights arising out of any agreement, transaction or relationship with you. Our policy regarding dispute resolution is as follows: Any controversy or claim arising out of or relating to our privacy policy, or the breach thereof, shall be settled by arbitration in accordance with the rules of the American Arbitration Association, and judgment upon the award rendered by the arbitrator(s) may be entered in any court having jurisdiction thereof. 93 Commitment For Title Insurance Issued by Old Republic National Title Insurance Company NOTICE IMPORTANT—READ CAREFULLY: THIS COMMITMENT IS AN OFFER TO ISSUE ONE OR MORE TITLE INSURANCE POLICIES. ALL CLAIMS OR REMEDIES SOUGHT AGAINST THE COMPANY INVOLVING THE CONTENT OF THIS COMMITMENT OR THE POLICY MUST BE BASED SOLELY IN CONTRACT. THIS COMMITMENT IS NOT AN ABSTRACT OF TITLE, REPORT OF THE CONDITION OF TITLE, LEGAL OPINION, OPINION OF TITLE, OR OTHER REPRESENTATION OF THE STATUS OF TITLE. THE PROCEDURES USED BY THE COMPANY TO DETERMINE INSURABILITY OF THE TITLE, INCLUDING ANY SEARCH AND EXAMINATION, ARE PROPRIETARY TO THE COMPANY, WERE PERFORMED SOLELY FOR THE BENEFIT OF THE COMPANY, AND CREATE NO EXTRACONTRACTUAL LIABILITY TO ANY PERSON, INCLUDING A PROPOSED INSURED. THE COMPANY’S OBLIGATION UNDER THIS COMMITMENT IS TO ISSUE A POLICY TO A PROPOSED INSURED IDENTIFIED IN SCHEDULE A IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE TERMS AND PROVISIONS OF THIS COMMITMENT. THE COMPANY HAS NO LIABILITY OR OBLIGATION INVOLVING THE CONTENT OF THIS COMMITMENT TO ANY OTHER PERSON. . COMMITMENT TO ISSUE POLICY Subject to the Notice; Schedule B, Part I—Requirements; Schedule B, Part II—Exceptions; and the Commitment Conditions, Old Republic National Title Insurance Company, a Minnesota corporation (the “Company”), commits to issue the Policy according to the terms and provisions of this Commitment. This Commitment is effective as of the Commitment Date shown in Schedule A for each Policy described in Schedule A, only when the Company has entered in Schedule A both the specified dollar amount as the Proposed Policy Amount and the name of the Proposed Insured. If all of the Schedule B, Part I—Requirements have not been met within 6 months after the Commitment Date, this Commitment terminates and the Company’s liability and obligation end. COMMITMENT CONDITIONS 1. DEFINITIONS 2. If all of the Schedule B, Part I—Requirements have not been met within the time period specified in the Commitment to Issue Policy, Commitment terminates and the Company’s liability and obligation end. 3. The Company’s liability and obligation is limited by and this Commitment is not valid without: 4. COMPANY’S RIGHT TO AMEND The Company may amend this Commitment at any time. If the Company amends this Commitment to add a defect, lien, encumbrance, adverse claim, or other matter recorded in the Public Records prior to the Commitment Date, any liability of the Company is limited by Commitment Condition 5. The Company shall not be liable for any other amendment to this Commitment. 5. LIMITATIONS OF LIABILITY i. comply with the Schedule B, Part I—Requirements; ii. eliminate, with the Company’s written consent, any Schedule B, Part II—Exceptions; or iii. acquire the Title or create the Mortgage covered by this Commitment. “Knowledge” or “Known”: Actual or imputed knowledge, but not constructive notice imparted by the Public Records.(a) “Land”: The land described in Schedule A and affixed improvements that by law constitute real property. The term “Land” does not include any property beyond the lines of the area described in Schedule A, nor any right, title, interest, estate, or easement in abutting streets, roads, avenues, alleys, lanes, ways, or waterways, but this does not modify or limit the extent that a right of access to and from the Land is to be insured by the Policy. (b) “Mortgage”: A mortgage, deed of trust, or other security instrument, including one evidenced by electronic means authorized by law.(c) “Policy”: Each contract of title insurance, in a form adopted by the American Land Title Association, issued or to be issued by the Company pursuant to this Commitment. (d) “Proposed Insured”: Each person identified in Schedule A as the Proposed Insured of each Policy to be issued pursuant to this Commitment.(e) “Proposed Policy Amount”: Each dollar amount specified in Schedule A as the Proposed Policy Amount of each Policy to be issued pursuant to this Commitment. (f) “Public Records”: Records established under state statutes at the Commitment Date for the purpose of imparting constructive notice of matters relating to real property to purchasers for value and without Knowledge. (g) “Title”: The estate or interest described in Schedule A.(h) the Notice;(a) the Commitment to Issue Policy;(b) the Commitment Conditions;(c) Schedule A;(d) Schedule B, Part I—Requirements; and(e) Schedule B, Part II—Exceptions; and(f) a counter-signature by the Company or its issuing agent that may be in electronic form.(g) The Company’s liability under Commitment Condition 4 is limited to the Proposed Insured’s actual expense incurred in the interval between the Company’s delivery to the Proposed Insured of the Commitment and the delivery of the amended Commitment, resulting from the Proposed Insured’s good faith reliance to: (a) The Company shall not be liable under Commitment Condition 5(a) if the Proposed Insured requested the amendment or had Knowledge of the matter and did not notify the Company about it in writing. (b) The Company will only have liability under Commitment Condition 4 if the Proposed Insured would not have incurred the expense had the Commitment included the added matter when the Commitment was first delivered to the Proposed Insured. (c) The Company’s liability shall not exceed the lesser of the Proposed Insured’s actual expense incurred in good faith and described in Commitment Conditions 5(a)(i) through 5(a)(iii) or the Proposed Policy Amount. (d) The Company shall not be liable for the content of the Transaction Identification Data, if any.(e) 94 6. LIABILITY OF THE COMPANY MUST BE BASED ON THIS COMMITMENT 7. IF THIS COMMITMENT HAS BEEN ISSUED BY AN ISSUING AGENT The issuing agent is the Company’s agent only for the limited purpose of issuing title insurance commitments and policies. The issuing agent is not the Company’s agent for the purpose of providing closing or settlement services. 8. PRO-FORMA POLICY The Company may provide, at the request of a Proposed Insured, a pro-forma policy illustrating the coverage that the Company may provide. A pro-forma policy neither reflects the status of Title at the time that the pro-forma policy is delivered to a Proposed Insured, nor is it a commitment to insure. 9. ARBITRATION The Policy contains an arbitration clause. All arbitrable matters when the Proposed Policy Amount is $2,000,000 or less shall be arbitrated at the option of either the Company or the Proposed Insured as the exclusive remedy of the parties. A Proposed Insured may review a copy of the arbitration rules at http://www.alta.org/arbitration. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, Land Title Insurance Corporation has caused its corporate name and seal to be affixed by its duly authorized officers on the date shown in Schedule A to be valid when countersigned by a validating officer or other authorized signatory. Issued by: Land Title Guarantee Company 3033 East First Avenue Suite 600 Denver, Colorado 80206 303-321-1880 Craig B. Rants, Senior Vice President This page is only a part of a 2016 ALTA® Commitment for Title Insurance issued by Old Republic National Title Insurance Company. This Commitment is not valid without the Notice; the Commitment to Issue Policy; the Commitment Conditions; Schedule A; Schedule B, Part I—Requirements; and Schedule B, Part II —Exceptions; and a counter-signature by the Company or its issuing agent that may be in electronic form. Copyright 2006-2016 American Land Title Association. All rights reserved. The use of this Form (or any derivative thereof) is restricted to ALTA licensees and ALTA members in good standing as of the date of use. All other uses are prohibited. Reprinted under license from the American Land Title Association. In no event shall the Company be obligated to issue the Policy referred to in this Commitment unless all of the Schedule B, Part I—Requirements have been met to the satisfaction of the Company. (f) In any event, the Company’s liability is limited by the terms and provisions of the Policy.(g) Only a Proposed Insured identified in Schedule A, and no other person, may make a claim under this Commitment.(a) Any claim must be based in contract and must be restricted solely to the terms and provisions of this Commitment.(b) Until the Policy is issued, this Commitment, as last revised, is the exclusive and entire agreement between the parties with respect to the subject matter of this Commitment and supersedes all prior commitment negotiations, representations, and proposals of any kind, whether written or oral, express or implied, relating to the subject matter of this Commitment. (c) The deletion or modification of any Schedule B, Part II—Exception does not constitute an agreement or obligation to provide coverage beyond the terms and provisions of this Commitment or the Policy. (d) Any amendment or endorsement to this Commitment must be in writing and authenticated by a person authorized by the Company.(e) When the Policy is issued, all liability and obligation under this Commitment will end and the Company’s only liability will be under the Policy.(f) 95 Exhibit B5 96 Exhibit B6 97 98 99 Page | 1 PRE-APPLICATION CONFERENCE SUMMARY DATE: September 21, 2022 PLANNER: Kevin Rayes | kevin.rayes@cityofaspen.com | 970.429.2797 PROJECT NAME AND ADDRESS: Callahan Subdivision Lot 11 |Stream Margin Review PARCEL ID# 2737-181-32-011 REPRESENTATIVE: Chris Bendon| Bendon Adams | chris@bendonadams.com DESCRIPTION: The subject property is an undeveloped platted lot located off Crystal Lake Drive, and within the Moderate Density Residential (R-15) zone district. Because of its proximity to the Roaring Fork River, a large portion of the lot is located within the Stream Margin Review Area. The Planning and Zoning Commission recently approved Resolution No. 8, Series of 2021 which established an alternative top of slope via Special Review. A Stream Margin Map was subsequently recorded to memorialize the top of slope (Reception No. 680910). The applicant is interested in developing the lot. Pursuant to Land Use Code Section 26.435.040, any development that occurs within one hundred feet from the high-water line of the Roaring Fork River is subject to Stream Margin Review. At the time of writing this pre-application, no representations have been made to staff regarding the size, configuration, or footprint of the proposed development. The type of review (administrative or board-level) shall be determined by staff when an application is submitted containing plans, drawings and other details related to the development. The application may be processed administratively if the Community Development Director determines that the proposed development complies with the Stream Margin Review Standards. If the standards are not met, the application shall be subject to review by the Planning and Zoning Commission for Special Review. Stream Margin Review Standards (Land Use Code Section 26.435.040.c): 1.It can be demonstrated that any proposed development which is in the Special Flood Hazard Area will not increase the base flood elevation on the parcel proposed for development. This shall be demonstrated by an engineering study prepared by a professional engineer registered to practice in the State which shows that the base flood elevation will not be raised, including, but not limited to, proposing mitigation techniques on or off-site which compensate for any base flood elevation increase caused by the development; and 2.The adopted regulatory plans of the Open Space and Trails Board and the Roaring Fork River Greenway Plan are implemented in the proposed plan for development, to the greatest extent practicable. Areas of historic public use or access shall be dedicated via a recorded easement for public use. A fisherman's easement granting public fishing access within the high water boundaries of the river course shall be granted via a recorded "Fisherman's Easement;" and 3.There is no vegetation removed or damaged or slope grade changes (cut or fill) made outside of a specifically defined building envelope. A building envelope shall be designated by this review and said envelope shall be designated by this review and said envelope shall be recorded on a plat pursuant to Subsection 26.435.040(f)(1); and 4.The proposed development does not pollute or interfere with the natural changes of the river, stream or other tributary, including erosion and/or sedimentation during construction. Increased on-site drainage shall be accommodated within the parcel to prevent entry into the river or onto its banks. Pools or hot tubs cannot be drained outside of the designated building envelope; and 5.Written notice is given to the Colorado Water Conservation Board prior to any alteration or relocation of a water course and a copy of said notice is submitted to the Federal Emergency Management Agency; and Exhibit B7 100 Page | 2 6. A guarantee is provided in the event a water course is altered or relocated, that applies to the developer and his heirs, successors and assigns that ensures that the flood carrying capacity on the parcel is not diminished; and 7. Copies are provided of all necessary federal and state permits relating to work within the 100 -year flood plain; and 8. There is no development other than approved native vegetation planting taking place below the top of slope or within fifteen (15) feet of the top of slope or the high waterline, whichever is most restrictive. This is an effort to protect the existing riparian vegetation and bank stability. New plantings (including trees, shrubs, flowers and grasses) outside of the designated building envelope on the river side shall be native riparian vegetation as approved by the City. A landscape plan will be submitted with all development applications. The top of slope and 100-year flood plain elevation of the Roaring Fork River shall be determined by the Stream Margin Map located in the Community Development Department and filed at the City Engineering Department; and 9. All development outside the fifteen (15) foot setback from the top of slope does not exceed a height delineated by a line drawn at a forty-five (45) degree angle from ground level at the top of slope. Height shall be measured and determined by the Community Development Director using the definition for height set forth at Section 26.04.100 and method of calculating height set forth at Section 26.575.020 as shown in Figure "A"; and 10. All exterior lighting is low and downcast with no light(s) directed toward the river or located down the slope and shall be in compliance wit h Section 26.575.150 . A lighting plan will be submitted with all development applications; and 11. There has been accurate identification of wetlands and riparian zones. RELEVANT LAND USE CODE SECTIONS: Section Number Section Title 26.212 Planning and Zoning Commission 26.304 Common Development Review Procedures 26.435.040 Stream Margin Review 26.710.050 Moderate Density Residential (R-15) For your convenience – links to the Land Use Application and the Land Use Code are below: Land Use Application | Land Use Code REVIEW BY: Community Development staff for complete application and content PUBLIC HEARING: Planning & Zoning Commission (If Special Review is required) PLANNING FEES: If admin. review- $1,300 deposit for 4 hours of staff time If P&Z review- $3,250 deposit for 10 hours of staff time (Additional or less hours will be billed or refunded at a rate of $325 per hour) REFERRAL FEES: Engineering - $325 for one hour of review time. (Additional or less hours will be billed or refunded at a rate of $325 per hour) TOTAL DEPOSIT: If admin. review - $1,625 If P&Z review - $3,575 101 Page | 3 APPLICATION CHECKLIST – PLEASE EMAIL APPLICATION TO: KEVIN.RAYES@CITYOFASPEN.COM  Completed Land Use Application and signed Fee Agreement.  HOA Compliance form (Attached to Application)  Pre-application Conference Summary (this document).  An 8 ½” by 11” vicinity map locating the parcel within the City of Aspen  Street address and legal description of the parcel on which development is proposed to occur, consisting of a current (no older than 6 months) certificate from a title insurance company, an ownership and encumbrance report, or attorney licensed to practice in the State of Colorado, listing the names of all owners of the property, and all mortgages, judgments, liens, easements, contracts and agreements affecting the parcel, and demonstrating the owner’s right to apply for the Development Application. The purpose of this requirement is to show that the Applicant has the authority to apply for a Land Use Case.  Applicant’s name, address and phone number, within a letter signed by the applicant stating the name, address and phone number of the representative authorized to act on behalf of the applicant  A written description of the proposal and an explanation in written, graphic, or model form of how the proposed development complies with the review standards relevant to the development application.  Drawings/renderings of the proposed development.  A recent site improvement survey (no older than 1 year)  A site plan showing property lines and existing and proposed features relevant to the temporary use and its relationship to uses and structures in the immediate vicinity. Once the copy is deemed complete by staff, the following items will then need to be submitted:  Total fee for review of the application. Disclaimer: The foregoing summary is advisory in nature only and is not binding on the City. The summary is based on current zoning, which is subject to change in the future, and upon factual representations that may or may not be accurate. The summary does not create a legal or vested right. 102 Exhibit C1 103 104 105 106 Exhibit C2107 300 SO SPRING ST | 202 | ASPEN, CO 81611 970.925.2855 | BENDONADAMS.COM June 5, 2023 Kevin Rayes Senior Planner City of Aspen 427 Rio Grande Pl. Aspen, CO 81611 RE: Supplemental Information #tbd Crystal Lake Road; Lot 11, Callahan Subdivision Stream Margin Review Mr. Rayes: Please accept this supplemental information regarding the Stream Margin Review application for the vacant parcel along Crystal Lake Road. You requested we respond to comments provided by City Parks and City Engineering departments. Response to Parks Department. All comments provided by the Parks Department on March 31st are acceptable. The applicant team did discuss the pathway planned within 15 feet of the top-of-slope with Parks department staff. Parks indicated acceptance of a soft-surface pathway. In response to the comments and follow-up discussion, the attached drawing specifies a 2.5-foot-wide permeable soft-surface pathway made of crusher fines. See Exhibit A8.1, attached. Response to Engineering Department. The Engineering Department had a series of comments, four of which required responses prior to the public hearing with the Planning and Zoning Commission. 1. The owners of Crystal Lake – Aspen Club Group, Inc. – have agreed to relocate the outfall pipe off the Eskenazi property. See letter attached as Exhibit A4.1. This should address the remaining questions regarding use of the perimeter easements and platting needs. 2. The perimeter easements are clear of encumbrances, trees, walls, etc. See updated civil plan attached as Exhibit A7.1. 3. The civil plans have been amended and foundation drains are not connected to the stormwater drywells. See updated civil plan attached as Exhibit A7.1. 108 Lot 11 Callahan SMR Page 2 300 SO SPRING ST | 202 | ASPEN, CO 81611 970.925.2855 | BENDONADAMS.COM 4. The civil plans have been updated to prohibit development within the top-of-slope setback. See updated civil plan attached as Exhibit A7.1. We can provide greater detail or answer additional questions that come up during the City’s review. Kind Regards, Chris Bendon, AICP BendonAdams LLC Exhibits: A 1. Review Criteria Responses 2. RDS Checklist 3. Wetland Delineation Report 4. Engineering Report 4.1 Letter from Aspen Club Group 5. Site Improvement Survey 6. Pre-Development Grade Analysis 7. Civil Plans 7.1 Update Civil Plan 8. Landscape Plans 8.1 Updated Landscape Plan 9. Architecture Plans 10. Lighting Plans 11. Site Photos 12. Vicinity Map B 1. Application Form 2. A8Authorization Letter 3. Statement of Authority - 680700 4. Proof of Ownership 5. HOA Form 6. Agreement to Pay 7. Pre-application Conference Summary C 1. P&Z Resolution No. 8-2021 – 678762 2. Approved Stream Margin Map – 680910 109 Aspen Club Group Inc. May 31, 2023 Chris Bendon BendonAdams 300 So. Spring St. #202 Aspen, CO 81611 Re: Eskenazi (vacant) Parcel on Crystal Lake Road Mr. Bendon, On behalf of the Board of Directors of the Aspen Club Group HOA, please accept this letter as confirming our intent to relocate and reroute the Crystal lake outfall so that it no longer utilizes the Eskenazi property located on Crystal Lake Road. The outfall for Crystal Lake is currently piped to the northwest corner of the Eskenazi property. From there, waters pass through the Eskenazi property towards the Roaring Fork River. With the vacant property slated for development, a different routing of the outfall is necessary. We have reviewed a preliminary concept drawing, attached, prepared by SGM Engineering and are generally amenable to this new routing. Much more detail will need to be developed prior to implementing a new outfall route. We anticipate this work being coordinated with the Eskenazi development schedule so as to minimize construction impacts. We look forward to continuing to work in good faith with you and the Eskenazi design team regarding moving the lake outfall. Please reach out if we can provide further clarity to the design team or to the City of Aspen. Regards, Ben Wolff General Manager & HOA Manager for Aspen Club Group Frias Properties of Aspen 730 E Durant Ave. Aspen, CO 81611 970-429-2435 Direct ben@friasproperties.com Exhibit A4.1 110 EM GM T E ES SHYDG8020801580208015801080058005 800080 0 4 8000 79957990800280058010 80158012Graphic ScaleIn Feet: 1" = 20'0102040Revision#Dwg No.Job No.Drawn by:Print Date:File:PE:QC:2022-467MHEXXRLBCrystalLake-UtilityRLB118 West Sixth Street, Suite 200 Glenwood Springs, CO 81601 970.945.1004 www.sgm-inc.com Date By:Of :Project Milestone: XPRELIMINARY NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION PITKIN COUNTY, CO 1417 CRYSTAL LAKE ROADTitle:THREADEDCAPWHEN LOCATED IN UN-PAVEDAREAS, THE CLEAN-OUTSHALL TERMINATE 3" BELOWFINISHED GRADE45° PVC ELBOWCOMPACTEDCLASS 6WHEN LOCATED IN PAVEDAREAS, INSTALL ROAD SECTIONUP TO EDGE OF PIPE &COMPACT TO SPECIFICATIONSUPPER 24" OF THEVERTICAL RISER SHALL BECAST OR DUCTILE IRON4" PVCSEWER LINE, SEEPLAN FOR SIZESCALE: NTSFLOW TO MAINFLOW45° PVC WYEOR ELBOW111 EM GM T Graphic ScaleIn Feet: 1" = 20'0102040Revision#Dwg No.Job No.Drawn by:Print Date:File:PE:QC:2022-467XXXXXXCrystalLake-SiteXX118 West Sixth Street, Suite 200 Glenwood Springs, CO 81601 970.945.1004 www.sgm-inc.com Date By:Of :Project Milestone: XPRELIMINARY NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION PITKIN COUNTY, CO 1417 CRYSTAL LAKE ROADTitle:Exhibit A7.1112 16141210080604131109070503+ 00.50201009999+00.5+99.25030200010203990001BS 00.5TW 03.5 0199989796959493929190LPTS 02.52%TS 1.5BS 0.5TS 00.1BS 99.54%+ 00.5+ 99.5SSHYD G802080158020801580108005800580008004800079957990 8002800580108015 8012 UP DN BBQPAPAPA PAPAPAPAPAC DATE#DESCRIPTION ISSUE DATE: SHEET NUMBER REVIEWED: PROJECT NUMBER: DRAWN: 1 REVISIONS 6905 2 3 4 5 6 7 A B C E ESKENAZI RESIDENCELOT 11, CALLAHAN SUBDIVISION C O P Y R I G H T D E S I G N W O R K S H O P, I N C. STREAM MARGIN REVIEW F 8 9 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 W W W . D E S I G N W O R K S H O P . C O M Dec 13, 2022 - 2:14pmC:\Users\DBagnasco\appdata\local\temp\AcPublish_26112\dw-6905-Stream Margin Review.dwgSITE PLAN L1-1 DESIGN WORKSHOP Landscape Architecture · Land Planning Urban Design · Tourism Planning Asheville · Aspen · Austin · Chicago · Denver · Dubai Houston · Lake Tahoe · Los Angeles · Shanghai 120 East Main Street (970) 925-8354 (970) 920-1387 Aspen, Colorado 81611 NORTH 0 ORIGINAL SCALE: 10 20 40 1"=20'-00"ASPEN, COLORADO, 81611PROPOSED RESIDENCE DECIDUOUS TREE TO REMAIN APPROVED TOP OF SLOPETOP OF SLOPE SETBACK PATIO EVERGREEN TREE TO REMAIN 10' SIDE SETBACK PROPERTY LINE 5' UTILITY EASEMENT 10' SIDE SETBACK PROPERTY LINE 5' UTILITY EASEMENT PROPOSED DRIVEWAY PROPOSED AUTOCOURT EXISTING CONTOUR PROPOSED CONTOUR PROPOSED BOULDER RETAINING WALLCRYSTAL LAKE ROAD12/20/2022 CW DB ROA RI N G F O R K RI V E R JUL Y 2 0 2 0 HI G H W A T E R LI N E PROPOSED STONE PAVING, TYP. ROOF OVERHANG, TYP. SPA PA 15'-0"R3UBH - ROARING FORK RIVER (PSS) PALUSTRINE SCRUB-SHRUB WETLANDS FLOOD ZONE AEFLOOD ZONE XFLOOD ZONE AE BASED FLOOD ELEVATION 7993 SPECIAL FLOOD ZONE X AREA OF 0.2% ANNUAL CHANCE OF FLOOD FLOOD ZONE AE FLOODWAYFLOOD ZONE AEFLOOD ZONE AE WITHIN FLOODWAY (PEM) PALUSTRINE EMERGENT WETLANDS PROPOSED GRAVEL PATH PROPERTY LINE 5' UTILITY EASEMENT 10' SIDE SETBACK 2.5' PERMEABLE CRUSHER FINES PATH Exhibit A8.1 113 16141210080604131109070503+ 00.50201009999+00.5+99.25030200010203990001BS 00.5TW 03.5 0199989796959493929190LPTS 02.52%TS 1.5BS 0.5TS 00.1BS 99.54%+ 00.5+ 99.55008021.620LS91845088021.620LS9184EESSHYD G802080158020801580108005800580008004800079957990 8002800580108015 8012 UP DN ? ALIGN ALIGN ALIGN 2 2 4 4 3 3 1 1 E E G G D D F F A A B B C C BBQPAPAPA PAPAPAPAPAC DATE#DESCRIPTION ISSUE DATE: SHEET NUMBER REVIEWED: PROJECT NUMBER: DRAWN: 1 REVISIONS 6905 2 3 4 5 6 7 A B C E ESKENAZI RESIDENCELOT 11, CALLAHAN SUBDIVISION C O P Y R I G H T D E S I G N W O R K S H O P, I N C. STREAM MARGIN REVIEW F 8 9 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 W W W . D E S I G N W O R K S H O P . C O M Dec 13, 2022 - 2:14pmC:\Users\DBagnasco\appdata\local\temp\AcPublish_26112\dw-6905-Stream Margin Review.dwgPLANTING PLAN L1-2 DESIGN WORKSHOP Landscape Architecture · Land Planning Urban Design · Tourism Planning Asheville · Aspen · Austin · Chicago · Denver · Dubai Houston · Lake Tahoe · Los Angeles · Shanghai 120 East Main Street (970) 925-8354 (970) 920-1387 Aspen, Colorado 81611 NORTH 0 ORIGINAL SCALE: 10 20 40 1"=20'-00"ASPEN, COLORADO, 8161112/20/2022 CW DB NATIVE RE-VEGETATION THIMBLEBERRY WOODS ROSE PITKIN COUNTY NATIVE MIX & COMMON LUPINE SIZE: SEED SPACING: 8-12 LBS/ACRE AREA: 8,500 SF DWARF SUMAC NO MOW FESCUE MALE FERN ROCKY MOUNTAIN COLUMBINE SIZE:5 GALLON SPACING: 24” O.C. QTY: 310 SIZE:5 GALLON SPACING: 24” O.C. QTY: 115 SIZE:5 GALLON SPACING: 24” O.C. QTY: 210 SIZE:SOD SPACING: N/A AREA:575 SQ FT SIZE: 5 GALLON SPACING: 12” O.C. QTY: 250 SIZE: 1 GALLON SPACING: 18” O.C. QTY: 15 PONDEROSA PINE SIZE: 12-18' HT QTY: 1 QUAKING ASPEN SINGLE STEM SIZE: 4-6" CAL SPACING: 6-12' O.C. QTY: 22 R3UBH - ROARING FORK RIVER (PSS) PALUSTRINE SCRUB-SHRUB WETLANDS (PEM) PALUSTRINE EMERGENT WETLANDS PROPOSED RESIDENCE DECIDUOUS TREE TO REMAIN APPROVED TOP OF SLOPETOP OF SLOPE SETBACK PATIO EVERGREEN TREE TO REMAIN 10' SIDE SETBACK PROPERTY LINE 5' UTILITY EASEMENT 10' SIDE SETBACK PROPERTY LINE 5' UTILITY EASEMENT PROPOSED DRIVEWAY PROPOSED AUTOCOURT EXISTING CONTOUR PROPOSED CONTOUR PROPOSED BOULDER RETAINING WALLCRYSTAL LAKE ROADROA RI N G F O R K RI V E R JUL Y 2 0 2 0 HI G H W A T E R LI N E PROPOSED STONE PAVING, TYP. ROOF OVERHANG, TYP. SPA PA FLOOD ZONE AEFLOOD ZONE XFLOOD ZONE AE FLOODWAYFLOOD ZONE AEPROPOSED GRAVEL PATH QUAKING ASPEN MULTI STEM SIZE: 4-6" CAL SPACING: 6-12' O.C. QTY: 22 2.5' PERMEABLE CRUSHER FINES PATH 114 EM GM T Graphic ScaleIn Feet: 1" = 20'0102040Revision#Dwg No.Job No.Drawn by:Print Date:File:PE:QC:2022-467XXXXXXCrystalLake-SiteXX118 West Sixth Street, Suite 200 Glenwood Springs, CO 81601 970.945.1004 www.sgm-inc.com Date By:Of :Project Milestone: XPRELIMINARY NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION PITKIN COUNTY, CO 1417 CRYSTAL LAKE ROADTitle:115 From:Matthew Brown To:Kevin Rayes; Peggy Zilbermann Subject:Fwd: Lot 11 Date:Wednesday, June 7, 2023 10:09:34 PM Hi Kevin, I shared information with the owner of 1444 Crystal Lake Road, Peggy Zilbermann, and she wishes to add her name to the email I sent you yesterday. I have updated the email below for Peggy to be included and she is cc'ed. I will try to be at the hearing for Lot 11 but in case I am not please share this email if possible during the approval process and/or public commentary. If there is anything further that I need to do please let me know. Thank you. Hello, I am the owner and full-time resident of 1440 Crystal Lake Road and along with the owners of 1444 Crystal Lake Road our homes exist directly across the street from Lot 11 of the Callahan subdivision. We support the application submitted by Lot 11 albeit with two requests. We seek clarification on the Planting Plan sheet number L 1-2. If we've misread the planting plan we apologize but it appears to us that there is no proposed tree retention nor replacement tree plantings on the uphill northwest area of Lot 11 which directly faces our properties and Crystal Lake Road itself. Attached is a photo of Lot 11 taken 6/5/2023 from 1440 Crystal Lake Road. As you can see Lot 11 is currently a thriving and mature Aspen grove with a few evergreens and it appears the proposed planting plan calls for the existing grove to be replaced with male ferns and thimbleberry. Male ferms and thimbleberry will provide little screening of the subject property and in our opinions inadequately replace the beauty of the existing Aspen tree grove and this area's historic forestation. We feel it would be more responsible stewardship of this property to provide for a partial replacement of trees that are found in abundance on and around the site today. The application does reflect a considerable number of Aspen trees to be being planted on the other sides of Lot 11 that face neighboring homes. While we understand Lot 11's proposed driveway will necessitate the removal of many of these mature trees there seems to be a sizable area uphill of the driveway that can maintain trees. Landscape screening is also neighborhood appropriate as this is the norm for other single family properties that exist on Crystal Lake Road now and this section of Crystal Lake Road sees a large number of pedestrians, bikers, drivers as it connects the road to highway 82 as well as to the East Aspen trail and the path to downtown. My other request is to get a sense of the scope and timing of the Utility work that is to occur as it may impact our properties. We wish the new neighbors a speedy construction and look forward to meeting them. Sincerely, Morgan and Matt Brown and Peggy and Mark Zilbermann 116 117