Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutagenda.hpc.20230712AGENDA ASPEN HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION July 12, 2023 4:30 PM, City Council Chambers - 3rd Floor 427 Rio Grande Place Aspen, CO 81611 I.ROLL CALL II.MINUTES III.PUBLIC COMMENTS IV.COMMISSIONER MEMBER COMMENTS V.DISCLOSURE OF CONFLICT OF INTEREST VI.PROJECT MONITORING VII.STAFF COMMENTS VIII.CERTIFICATE OF NO NEGATIVE EFFECT ISSUED IX.CALL UP REPORTS X.SUBMIT PUBLIC NOTICE FOR AGENDA ITEMS XI.OLD BUSINESS XII.NEW BUSINESS XII.AResolution #__, Series of 2023, 630 West Main Street - Minor Development, Growth Management, Planned Development and Conditional Use Memo_630 W Main St.pdf Resolution #__, Series 2023.pdf Exhibit A_Historic Preservation Guidelines Criteria_Staff Findings.pdf Exhibit B_Growth Management Quota System Staff Findings.pdf Exhibit C_Planned Development Staff Findings.pdf Exhibit D_Conditional Use Staff Findings.pdf Exhibit E_Application.pdf Exhibit F_Referral Comments.pdf 1 1 XII.BResolution #___, Series of 2023_420 E. Durant Avenue, Rubey Park Transit Center - Minor PD Amendment, Minor HP Development, Commercial Design Review XIII.ADJOURN XIV.NEXT RESOLUTION NUMBER Final Memo_420 E Durant Avenue_Minor HP_PD_Commercial Design.pdf Resolution #___, Series 2023_420 E Durant Avenue.pdf Exhibit A_420 E Durant Ave_ Amendment to Detailed Review Approval Criteria_Staff Findings.pdf Exhibit B_420 E Durant Ave_Commercial Design Review Criteria.pdf Exhibit C_Application_Rubey Park Electrifcation Land Use Packet.pdf TYPICAL PROCEEDING FORMAT FOR ALL PUBLIC HEARINGS (1 Hour, 10 Minutes for each Major Agenda Item) 1. Declaration of Conflicts of Interest (at beginning of agenda) 2. Presentation of proof of legal notice (at beginning of agenda) 3. Applicant presentation (20 minutes) 4. Board questions and clarifications of applicant (5 minutes) 5. Staff presentation (5 minutes) 6. Board questions and clarifications of staff (5 minutes) 7. Public comments (5 minutes total, or 3 minutes/ person or as determined by the Chair) 8. Close public comment portion of hearing 9. Applicant rebuttal/clarification (5 minutes) 10. Staff rebuttal/clarification (5 minutes) End of fact finding. Chairperson identifies the issues to be discussed. 11. Deliberation by the commission and findings based on criteria commences. No further input from applicant or staff unless invited by the Chair. Staff may ask to be recognized if there is a factual error to be corrected. If the item is to be continued, the Chair may provide a summary of areas to be restudied at their discretion, but the applicant is not to re-start discussion of the case or the board’s direction. (20 minutes) 12. Motion Updated: November 15, 2021 2 2 Page 1 of 6 427 Rio Grande Place, Aspen, CO 81611 | cityofaspen.com MEMORANDUM TO: Aspen Historic Preservation Commission THROUGH: Amy Simon, Planning Director FROM: Kirsten Armstrong, Principal Planner Historic Preservation Haley Hart, Long-Range Planner MEETING DATE: July 12, 2023 RE: 630 West Main Street – Minor Development, Growth Management, Planned Development and Conditional Use, PUBLIC HEARING APPLICANT /OWNER: The City of Aspen, 427 Rio Grande Place REPRESENTATIVE: Jennifer Phelan, Development Manager, City of Aspen Asset Management LOCATION: Street Address: 630 W. Main Street Legal Description: Lot M, Block 24, City and Townsite of Aspen Parcel Identification Number: 2735-124-44-855 CURRENT ZONING & USE Public; Government Office/Essential Public Facility PROPOSED ZONING & USE: Public; Affordable Housing SUMMARY: 630 W. Main Street is a landmarked property owned by the City of Aspen containing an AspenModern, ca. 1966, Pan Abode building originally constructed to house Mountain Rescue Aspen. Currently, 630 W. Main Street is the home to the City of Aspen Special Events and Transportation teams. The applicant proposes to convert the building into an affordable housing duplex. Exterior improvements include changes to the fenestration on the non-historic addition, installation of gutters and exterior lighting, repair of an existing entry roof on the non- historic addition, and construction of an accessible walkway along the southwest side of the parcel. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends approval of the application with conditions identified in the attached resolution. Figure 1. Site Location – 630 W. Main Street 630 3 Page 2 of 6 427 Rio Grande Place, Aspen, CO 81611 | cityofaspen.com BACKGROUND: The property at 630 W. Main Street is an Essential Public Use Facility because of its public service function. The building is landmarked as an AspenModern Pan Abode kit building with a historic association to the founding of Mountain Rescue Aspen which used the site as its headquarters until the non-profit relocated to the AABC in 2014, after which the City of Aspen took occupancy of the property. 630 W. Main Street is additionally located within the Main Street Historic District. Along with the Pan Abode, an emergency siren atop a metal pole rises above the building on the northeast corner of the property. Per the Architectural Inventory Form, it is likely that the siren is also from the 1960s and contributes to the historic integrity of the site. In 1989, City Council approved Ordinance #34, Series of 1989, and the property was rezoned from Office, now classified as Mixed Use, to Public (PUB), to ensure that Mountain Rescue Aspen operated as a permitted use, and to allow the organization a much-needed expansion of meeting and equipment storage space in the form of an 1,145 square foot addition. The non-historic expansion was memorialized through dimensional requirements that were established for the site through a Planned Development approval by the Planning and Zoning Commission in 1989. HPC meeting minutes dated June 14, 1989, also document the approval for the addition. Clapboard siding was applied to the east and west elevations of the original Pan Abode building, likely at the same time the rear addition was constructed. After the AspenModern program was established and Pan Abodes were recognized as a significant building type representing Aspen’s postwar development, the property was landmarked in 2017 via Ordinance #9, Series of 2017. Below are a 1980 photograph (left, City of Aspen files) and a 2023 photograph (right, site visit). Although alterations have been made including the painting of the originally stained log, application of standing seam metal roofing, replacement of the windows, application of clapboard on the east and west elevations, and the addition to the rear, 630 W. Main Street retains a sufficient level of historic integrity to convey its significance as a kit building, and for its association with the history of Mountain Rescue Aspen. REQUEST OF HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION (HPC): HPC shall consider the following sections from Title 26 as related to this application: Figure 3. 1980 Photograph of 630 W. Main Street (City of Aspen Files). Figure 2. 2023 Photograph of 630 W. Main Street (Site Visit, 2023). 4 Page 3 of 6 427 Rio Grande Place, Aspen, CO 81611 | cityofaspen.com • Minor Development (Section 26.415.070.C) for alterations to the exterior features of the structure and site. • Growth Management Quota System (GMQS) General Review Standards (Section 26.470.080) for compliance with Aspen Pitkin County Housing Authority (APCHA) standards and development conformance. • Planned Development (PD) Minor Amendment to a Detailed Review approval (Section 26.445.110) for amendments to memorialize updated dimensional standards. • Conditional Use (Section 26.425.040) as the conversion to 100% Affordable Housing requires a change in use and conditional use approval. HPC is the final review authority, however the scope of this application is subject to Notice of Call- Up at City Council. PROJECT SUMMARY: The Applicant proposes to convert the existing Pan Abode, currently used as city offices, to an affordable housing duplex to be owned and operated by the City. It will be 100 percent voluntary affordable housing, for the purposes of housing City of Aspen staff, and will comply with APCHA guidelines as set forth in the conditions of approval. The applicant requests updates to dimensional requirements including setbacks to memorialize the existing conditions and height to accommodate mechanical equipment on the east side of the site. Additionally, one off-street parking per unit is proposed to be included in the PD amendment. Exterior updates proposed for the subject property include the construction of a new concrete walkway connecting the existing front walkway to an entrance to the rear unit on the west elevation; installation of new light fixtures at the entrances on the west elevation and at the garage door on the north elevation; removal and replacement of windows on the non-historic addition; repair of an existing entry gable on the west elevation of the non-historic addition; and installation of K-style painted gutters. Non-historic clapboard siding on the east and west elevations of the historic Pan Abode will be removed per Design Guidelines 2.1 and 2.6. STAFF COMMENTS: Exhibits A, B, C, and D identify the review criteria and design guidelines to be considered for this application. Section 26.415.070.C, Historic Preservation Minor Development In general staff finds that the Historic Preservation Design Guidelines are met, with conditions related to the topics addressed below. Landscaping: Staff is concerned that maintenance of the proposed walkway in the winter may lead to piling snow against the west side of the Pan Abode. It is recommended that a snow storage plan be developed, perhaps including signage directing residents to push shoveled snow to the northwest and southwest corners of the site. As a condition of approval, and also to help mitigate the impact of piled or melting snow on the historic structure, a 1 ft wide maintenance border filled with gravel is required around the perimeter of the Pan Abode. 5 Page 4 of 6 427 Rio Grande Place, Aspen, CO 81611 | cityofaspen.com Original Finish: Changes to the exterior will be minor, and removal of the non-historic clapboard siding on the historic resource will comply with Historic Preservation Guideline 2.6. A preservation plan, to be approved by staff and monitor, will need to be in place for the removal of the non-historic clapboard and the repair/restoration of the original material underneath. The original stained wood has been previously painted. Staff provided a comment to the applicant suggesting that the finish be taken back to a stain, but it was indicated that this is outside the scope of their project. Staff further suggested a color scheme sympathetic to the original wood, with the addition differentiated in a darker color in order for it to recede. No conditions will be placed regarding this as paint color is outside the purview of review, however staff does view this as a meaningful and achievable improvement to the reading of the historic resource vs. the addition and asks that the applicant reconsider the proposal to paint the addition green, which would appear to call new attention to it. Mechanical/Utilitarian Features: Provided plans have not included detailed information regarding meters, vents, flues, or roof snow retention. Further, while a location for a strobe is indicated on plans, the FDC hookup is not included on the most up to date plan set. A review of detailed plans is required to ensure these systems are not visually incompatible with the historic structure and its surrounding district. New penetrations through the walls of the historic resource for vents and flues would be considered inappropriate. Proposed meters, vents, and flues should prioritize placement on the non-historic addition. Snow clips, of a finish that blends with the existing roof, are recommended by staff. As these items are updated, they will require staff and monitor review. Rain Garden: Improvements to stormwater management are required by the Engineering Department. A rain garden is proposed at the front of the site as a 6 ft by 4 ft area at a 1 ft depression into the ground with a larger 12 ft by 10 ft area sloping into it. A bioswale seed mix, which is typically a mix of unmowed grasses and wildflowers is proposed to be planted in the rain garden. As the rain garden must be located in the front yard due to site constraints, Staff recommends that the rain garden be restudied in order to lessen the appearance of a basin in the landscape and the visual impact to the historic resource. The final design must be reviewed and approved by staff and monitor prior to submittal for building permit. Section 26.470.080, GMQS General Review Standards The proposed project scope is to change the existing Pan Abode from an Essential Public Facility development category to the Residential - Affordable Housing development category. For change of use, there is no annual limit for residential affordable housing development type. This is in recognition of the high priority placed on the development of affordable housing to meet community needs. As 100 percent voluntary affordable housing, the project does not need to mitigate for employee generation. The units will be part of the City of Aspen’s pool of housing for its own employees. The applicant will comply with all APCHA guidelines. 6 Page 5 of 6 427 Rio Grande Place, Aspen, CO 81611 | cityofaspen.com Section 26.445.110, PD Minor Amendment to a Detailed Review approval The proposed application requests updates to the PD to ensure that the alterations to physical characteristics and use of the site are compliant. In 1989 the Aspen City Council approved Ordinance No. 34, Series of 1989, and the property was rezoned from Office, now classified as Mixed Use, to Public (PUB). At the time, the rezoning to PUB included a requirement to set dimensional requirements per Section 5-220.D of the Aspen Land Use Regulations through establishing a PD. The PD has not been amended since its creation in 1989. The applicant requests to change the dimensional requirements for the side yard setback and rear yard setback to better reflect existing conditions based on an updated survey. The applicant requests a change from a 5 ft to a 4.5 ft side yard setback and a change from a 9 ft to an 8 ft rear yard setback. The addition of the dimensional standard of 6-ft in height for mechanical equipment on the east side of the non-historic addition is proposed to be memorialized for the inclusion of a mini-split for the duplex. The applicant will screen the mechanical equipment using a 6 ft fence. The approval of the mechanical equipment may be accommodated within the site-specific dimensional allowances set by the PD and staff and monitor may approve the final design and location of the equipment. The 1989 PD approved parking for two vehicles, two snow mobiles, a trailer in the garage, and an on-street parking space was designated for Mountain Rescue’s third vehicle. By converting the use to a duplex, and by amending the PD to update dimensional requirements, the applicant proposes the PD be amended for on-site parking to be one space (1) per unit, accommodated in the garage. Site-specific dimensions, such as parking and setbacks, may be granted through the PD amendment. Due to the limited distance between the garage and alley property line, the provision of tandem parking, as it was approved for Aspen Mountain Rescue in 1989, is not feasible. Additionally, multi-family development in this vicinity is permitted a parking ratio of one parking space per unit, which is the same as what is being requested. The location: close to transit, walkable to downtown, and with easy access to the city’s trail system provides great multi-modal options to get around town. Both the multi-modal opportunities and parking ratio for multi- family development provide a reasonable basis to grant the parking request of one off- street parking space per dwelling unit for this site-specific development. The applicant proposes the following dimensional requirements as part of the Minor Amendment to the PD Detailed Review: Dimensional Standards for 630 W Main St Current: Proposed: Minimum lot size: 3,000 sq ft 3,000 sq ft Minimum lot area per dwelling unit: N/A N/A Minimum lot width: 30 ft 30 ft Minimum front yard setback: 19 ft 19 ft Minimum rear yard setback: 9 ft 8 ft 7 Page 6 of 6 427 Rio Grande Place, Aspen, CO 81611 | cityofaspen.com Minimum side yard setback: 5 ft 4.5 ft Maximum height for mechanical equipment in east side yard: N/A 6 ft Maximum height: 20 ft 20 ft Minimum distance between principal and accessory building: N/A N/A Percent of open space required for building site: N/A N/A External floor area ratio: 0.75:1, 2,250 sq.ft 0.75:1, 2,250 sq. ft. Internal floor area ratio: N/A N/A Parking: Two snow mobiles, one trailer, three vehicles One parking spot per unit Table 1: Dimensional Standards for 630 W. Main St. Staff finds that amending the PD to memorialize current conditions and requested future development is appropriate and meets the review criteria in Section 26.445.070 - Detailed Review Standards. Section 26.425.040, Conditional Use The Public zone district allows affordable housing as a conditional use. The applicant’s site plan is compatible with the context and visual character of the area. The subject property is surrounded by the Mixed-Use zone district which runs along Main Street. Across the alley, the properties are located within a residential zone district, R-6. Residential uses surround the subject property. REFERRAL COMMENTS: In preparation for this review, staff referred the application to the Parks Department, Engineering Department, and APCHA. Each had comments that affect HPC’s decisions. Comments that need to be carried forward as conditions of approval are found in the Resolution. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends the Historic Preservation Commission approve this application with conditions, for the conversion of an Essential Public Facility to Affordable Housing. ATTACHMENTS: Resolution #__, Series of 2023 Exhibit A – Historic Preservation Design Guidelines Staff Findings Exhibit B – Growth Management Quota System Staff Findings Exhibit C – Planned Development Staff Findings Exhibit D – Conditional Use Staff Findings Exhibit E – Application Exhibit F – Referral Comments 8 HPC Resolution # __, Series of 2023 Page 1 of 5 RESOLUTION #__ (SERIES OF 2023) A RESOLUTION OF THE ASPEN HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION (HPC) GRANTING MINOR DEVELOPMENT, GROWTH MANAGEMENT QUOTA SYSTEM, PLANNED DEVELOPMENT MINOR AMENDMENT AND CONDITIONAL USE REVIEW FOR THE PROPERTY LOCATED AT 630 WEST MAIN STREET, LOT M, BLOCK 24, CITY AND TOWNSITE OF ASPEN, COLORADO PARCEL ID: 2735-124-44-855 WHEREAS, the applicant, The City of Aspen, 427 Rio Grande Place, represented by Jennifer Phelan, Development Manager, City of Aspen Asset Management, has requested HPC approval for Minor Development, Growth Management, Planned Development Minor Amendment and Conditional Use to create a deed restricted affordable housing duplex residence at the property located at 630 West Main Street, Lot M, Block 24, City and Townsite of Aspen, Colorado; and WHEREAS, Section 26.415.070 of the Municipal Code states that “no building or structure shall be erected, constructed, enlarged, altered, repaired, relocated or improved involving a designated historic property or district until plans or sufficient information have been submitted to the Community Development Director and approved in accordance with the procedures established for their review;” and WHEREAS, for Minor Development Review, the HPC must review the application, a staff analysis report and the evidence presented at a hearing to determine the project’s conformance with the City of Aspen Historic Preservation Design Guidelines per Section 26.415.070.C of the Municipal Code and other applicable Code Sections. The HPC may approve, disapprove, approve with conditions or continue the application to obtain additional information necessary to make a decision to approve or deny; and WHEREAS, for approval of the Growth Management Quota System, the application shall meet the requirements of Aspen Municipal Code Section 26.470.080, Growth Management Quota System General Review Standards; and WHEREAS, for approval of Planned Development Amendments, the application shall meet the requirements of Aspen Municipal Code Section 26.445.110, Planned Development Minor Amendment to a Detailed Review approval; and WHEREAS, for approval of Conditional Use, the application shall meet the requirements of Aspen Municipal Code Section 26.425.040, Standards applicable to all conditional uses; and WHEREAS, as a historic landmark, the site is exempt from Residential Design Standards review; and WHEREAS, Community Development Department staff reviewed the application for compliance with applicable review standards and recommended approval with conditions; and 9 HPC Resolution # __, Series of 2023 Page 2 of 5 WHEREAS, HPC reviewed the project on July 12, 2023. HPC considered the application, the staff memo and public comment, and found the proposal consistent with the review standards and granted approval as proposed by a vote of __ to __. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED: Section 1: Approval That HPC hereby approves Minor Development, Growth Management Quota System, Planned Development Minor Amendment and Conditional Use review for 630 West Main Street with the following conditions: 1. If the existing non-historic windows on the historic resource are determined to need replacement, window specs are to be provided for review and approval by staff and monitor prior to submittal for building permit. Historic photographs must be consulted, and windows must match the originals in material and configuration. 2. Restudy the rain garden feature at the front of the site to lessen the maximum depth and the visual impact to the historic resource, and/or consider other options for stormwater management that decrease the size of the front garden. Detailed plans must be reviewed and approved by staff and monitor prior to building permit application. Clarification is needed on the mature height of plantings in the bioswale seed mix. 3. Approval of Fire Department Connection (FDC) hookup location requires review and approval by staff and monitor prior to building permit submittal. Strobe is to have a white casing. 4. The emergency siren located on the northeast corner of the parcel is to be preserved in place. 5. A snow retention plan, preferably using snow clips rather than rails, will be reviewed and approved by staff and monitor prior to building permit application. 6. If there is no intention to return the Pan Abode to its historic material finish of stain, the applicant is asked to consider a paint scheme more sympathetic to the original wood coloring, with the addition differentiated by a darker color in order to highlight the historic resource. 7. Applicant must submit a preservation plan for non-historic clapboard removal and restoration/repair, as needed, of existing original material on east and west elevations of the historic resource for staff and monitor review and approval prior to submittal for building permit. 8. A 1 ft gravel filled maintenance border is required along the perimeter of the historic resource to distance irrigation and plant material from the building. Prior to building permit submission, a plan must be in place and approved by the staff and monitor to deter snow buildup along the historic resource. 9. The proposed concrete sidewalk leading down the southwest side of the structure must comply with the 1 ft gravel filled maintenance border per condition number eight (8). The concrete sidewalk design must eliminate excavation of subgrade soil within spruce dripline, with a possible floating detail to be reviewed and approved by the Parks Department and staff and monitor prior to building permit. 10. The apple tree in the right-of-way will be removed by the City of Aspen due to bear nuisance. The City of Aspen will replant two street trees of a species identified by the Parks Department. The street trees are to be planted 15 ft on center, consistent with the pattern on Main Street. 10 HPC Resolution # __, Series of 2023 Page 3 of 5 11. Irrigation is required to be installed in the front yard to the back of the curb including irrigation for the two new street trees per Section 21.20.050. - Property owner responsible for maintenance of landscaping in adjoining right-of-way. 12. The following dimensional standards are approved through a Minor PD Amendment: 4.5- ft side yard setback, 8-ft rear yard setback, 6-ft in height for the allowance of mechanical equipment on the east side yard, and parking ratio of one on-site space per unit. All dimensional standards are memorialized as follows: 13. Exterior mechanical equipment shall be located adjacent to the non-historic addition only. Any changes to mechanical equipment and screening must be reviewed and approved by staff and monitor prior to submittal for building permit. 14. The applicant must provide plans and elevations of the types and locations of new vents, flues, and meters for review and approval by staff and monitor prior to permit application. Vents and flues on the exterior of the building are to be placed on the addition to the extent possible and are to avoid creating new penetrations on the walls of the historic resource. Roof vents on the historic resource are generally acceptable. New vents and flues should be minimized, carefully placed, and painted a dark color in order to recede from view. 15. A deed restriction shall be recorded on the property allowing for the units to be either rental or ownership units with up to a RO designation. 16. All potential buyers/tenants shall be approved as a qualified Pitkin County employee prior to entering into a contract to purchase or signing a lease as a tenant. 17. Each unit must contain a closet in the bedrooms as specified in the APCHA Regulations, contain a full kitchen as well as accommodate for a washer and dryer. 18. Each unit will have access to one parking space located within the garage. 19. Minimum occupancy requirements – one person per bedroom – as defined in the APCHA Regulations, must be met. Dimensional Standards for 630 West Main Street Minimum lot size: 3,000 square feet Minimum lot area per dwelling unit: N/A Minimum lot width: 30 feet Minimum front yard setback: 19 feet Minimum rear yard setback: 8 feet Minimum side yard setback: 4.5 feet Maximum height for mechanical equipment in east side yard: 6 feet Maximum height: 20 feet Minimum distance between principal and accessory building: N/A Percent of open space required for building site: N/A External floor area ratio: 0.75:1, 2,250 square feet Internal floor area ratio: N/A Parking: One parking spot per unit 11 HPC Resolution # __, Series of 2023 Page 4 of 5 20. The City of Aspen shall have the flexibility to change the deed restriction categories between 1-4 or Resident Occupied at will, based on the occupancy of the tenant/owner. Section 2: Material Representations All material representations and commitments made by the Applicant pursuant to the development proposal approvals as herein awarded, whether in public hearing or documentation presented before the Community Development Department, the Historic Preservation Commission, or the Aspen City Council are hereby incorporated in such plan development approvals and the same shall be complied with as if fully set forth herein, unless amended by other specific conditions or an authorized authority. Section 3: Existing Litigation This Resolution shall not affect any existing litigation and shall not operate as an abatement of any action or proceeding now pending under or by virtue of the ordinances repealed or amended as herein provided, and the same shall be conducted and concluded under such prior ordinances. Section 4: Severability If any section, subsection, sentence, clause, phrase, or portion of this Resolution is for any reason held invalid or unconstitutional in a court of competent jurisdiction, such portion shall be deemed a separate, distinct and independent provision and shall not affect the validity of the remaining portions thereof. Section 5: Vested Rights The development approvals granted herein shall constitute a site-specific development plan vested for a period of three (3) years from the date of issuance of a development order. However, any failure to abide by any of the terms and conditions attendant to this approval shall result in the forfeiture of said vested property rights. Unless otherwise exempted or extended, failure to properly record all plats and agreements required to be recorded, as specified herein, within 180 days of the effective date of the development order shall also result in the forfeiture of said vested property rights and shall render the development order void within the meaning of Section 26.104.050 (Void permits). Zoning that is not part of the approved site-specific development plan shall not result in the creation of a vested property right. No later than fourteen (14) days following final approval of all requisite reviews necessary to obtain a development order as set forth in this Ordinance, the City Clerk shall cause to be published in a newspaper of general circulation within the jurisdictional boundaries of the City of Aspen, a notice advising the general public of the approval of a site specific development plan and creation of a vested property right pursuant to this Title. Such notice shall be substantially in the following form: Notice is hereby given to the general public of the approval of a site specific development plan, and the creation of a vested property right, valid for a period of three (3) years, pursuant to the Land Use Code of the City of Aspen and Title 24, Article 68, Colorado Revised Statutes, pertaining to the following described property: 630 West Main Street. Nothing in this approval shall exempt the development order from subsequent reviews and approvals required by this approval of the general rules, regulations and ordinances or the City of Aspen provided that such reviews and approvals are not inconsistent with this approval. 12 HPC Resolution # __, Series of 2023 Page 5 of 5 The approval granted hereby shall be subject to all rights of referendum and judicial review; the period of time permitted by law for the exercise of such rights shall not begin to run until the date of publication of the notice of final development approval as required under Section 26.304.070(A). The rights of referendum shall be limited as set forth in the Colorado Constitution and the Aspen Home Rule Charter. APPROVED BY THE COMMISSION at its regular meeting on the 12th day of July, 2023. Approved as to Form: Approved as to Content: ________________________________ ________________________________ Katharine Johnson, Assistant City Attorney Kara Thompson, Chair ATTEST: ________________________________ Mike Sear, Deputy City Clerk 13 Exhibit A Minor Development Historic Preservation Design Guidelines Staff Findings 1 Staff responses begin on page 5 of this exhibit, following a list of applicable guidelines. 26.415.070. Development involving designated historic property or property within a historic district. No building, structure or landscape shall be erected, constructed, enlarged, altered, repaired, relocated or improved involving a designated historic property or a property located within a Historic District until plans or sufficient information have been submitted to the Community Development Director and approved in accordance with the procedures established for their review. An application for a building permit cannot be submitted without a development order. 14 Exhibit A Minor Development Historic Preservation Design Guidelines Staff Findings 2 26.415.070.C Minor Development 3. The procedures for the review of minor development projects are as follows: b) Staff shall review the submittal material and prepare a report that analyzes the project’s conformance with the design guidelines and other applicable Land Use Code sections. This report will be transmitted to the HPC with relevant information on the proposed project and a recommendation to approve, disapprove or approve with conditions and the reasons for the recommendation. The HPC will review the application, the report and the evidence presented at the hearing to determine the project’s conformance with the City Historic Preservation Design Guidelines. c) The HPC shall approve, disapprove, approve with conditions or continue the application to obtain additional information necessary to make a decision to approve or deny. If the application is approved, the HPC shall issue a certificate of appropriateness and the Community Development Director shall issue a development order. Relevant Historic Preservation Design Guidelines: 1.5 Maintain the historic hierarchy of spaces. • Reflect the established progression of public to private spaces from the public sidewalk to a semi-public walkway, to a semi private entry feature, to private spaces. 1.6 Provide a simple walkway running perpendicular from the street to the front entry on residential projects. • Meandering walkways are not allowed, except where it is needed to avoid a tree or is typical of the period of significance. • Use paving materials that are similar to those used historically for the building style and install them in the manner that they would have been used historically. For example, on an Aspen Victorian landmark, set flagstone pavers in sand, rather than in concrete. Light grey concrete, brick or red sandstone are appropriate private walkway materials for most landmarks. • The width of a new entry sidewalk should generally be three feet or less for residential properties. A wider sidewalk may be appropriate for an AspenModern property. 1.8 Consider stormwater quality needs early in the design process. • When included in the initial planning for a project, stormwater quality facilities can be better integrated into the proposal. All landscape plans presented for HPC review must include at least a preliminary representation of the stormwater design. A more detailed design must be reviewed and approved by Planning and Engineering prior to building permit submittal. • Site designs and stormwater management should provide positive drainage away from the historic landmark, preserve the use of natural drainage and treatment systems of the 15 Exhibit A Minor Development Historic Preservation Design Guidelines Staff Findings 3 site, reduce the generation of additional stormwater runoff, and increase infiltration into the ground. Stormwater facilities and conveyances located in front of a landmark should have minimal visual impact when viewed from the public right of way. • Refer to City Engineering for additional guidance and requirements. 1.24 Preserve historically significant landscapes with few or no alterations. • An analysis of the historic landscape and an assessment of the current condition of the landscape should be done before the beginning of any project. • The key features of the historic landscape and its overall design intent must be preserved. 1.25 New development on these sites should respect the historic design of the landscape and its built features. • Do not add features that damage the integrity of the historic landscape. • Maintain the existing pattern of setbacks and siting of structures. • Maintain the historic relationship of the built landscape to natural features on the site. • All additions to these landscapes must be clearly identifiable as recent work. • New artwork must be subordinate to the designed landscape in terms of placement, height, material, and overall appearance. Place new art away from significant landscape features. • Avoid installing utility trenches in cultural landscapes if possible. 1.26 Preserve the historic circulation system. • Minimize the impact of new vehicular circulation. • Minimize the visual impact of new parking. • Maintain the separation of pedestrian and vehicle which occurred historically. 1.27 Preserve and maintain significant landscaping on site. • Protect established vegetation during any construction. • If any tree or shrub needs to be removed, replace it with the same or similar species. • New planting should be of a species used historically or a similar species. • Maintain and preserve any gardens and/or ornamental planting on the site. • Maintain and preserve any historic landscape elements. 2.1 Preserve original building materials. • Do not remove siding that is in good condition or that can be repaired in place. • Masonry features that define the overall historic character, such as walls, cornices, pediments, steps and foundations, should be preserved. • Avoid rebuilding a major portion of an exterior wall that could be repaired in place. Reconstruction may result in a building which no longer retains its historic integrity. • Original AspenModern materials may be replaced in kind if it has been determined that the weathering detracts from the original design intent or philosophy. 2.2 The finish of materials should be as it would have existed historically. 16 Exhibit A Minor Development Historic Preservation Design Guidelines Staff Findings 4 • Masonry naturally has a water-protective layer to protect it from the elements. Brick or stone that was not historically painted shall not be painted. • If masonry that was not painted historically was given a coat of paint at some more recent time, consider removing it, using appropriate methods. • Wood should be painted, stained or natural, as appropriate to the style and history of the building. 2.6 Remove layers that cover the original material. • Once the non-historic siding is removed, repair the original, underlying material. 3.3 Match a replacement window to the original in its design. • If the original is double-hung, then the replacement window must also be double-hung. If the sash has divided lights, match that characteristic as well. 3.5 Preserve the size and proportion of a historic window opening. • Changing the window opening is not permitted. • Consider restoring an original window opening that was enclosed in the past. 3.6 Match, as closely as possible, the profile of the sash and its components to that of the original window. • A historic window often has a complex profile. Within the window’s casing, the sash steps back to the plane of the glazing (glass) in several increments. These increments, which individually only measure in eighths or quarters of inches, are important details. They distinguish the actual window from the surrounding plane of the wall. • The historic profile on AspenModern properties is typically minimal. 7.4 New vents should be minimized, carefully, placed and painted a dark color. • Direct vents for fireplaces are generally not permitted to be added on historic structures. • Locate vents on non-street facing facades. • Use historic chimneys as chases for new flues when possible. 7.10 Design gutters so that their visibility on the structure is minimized to the extent possible. • Downspouts should be placed in locations that are not visible from the street if possible, or in locations that do not obscure architectural detailing on the building. • The material used for the gutters should be in character with the style of the building. 12.3 Exterior light fixtures should be simple in character. • The design of a new fixture should be appropriate in form, finish, and scale with the structure. 17 Exhibit A Minor Development Historic Preservation Design Guidelines Staff Findings 5 • New fixtures should not reflect a different period of history than that of the affected building or be associated with a different architectural style. • Lighting should be placed in a manner that is consistent with the period of the building and should not provide a level of illumination that is out of character. • One light adjacent to each entry is appropriate on an Aspen Victorian residential structure. A recessed fixture, surface mounted light, pendant or sconce will be considered if suited to the building type or style. • On commercial structures and AspenModern properties, recessed lights and concealed lights are often most appropriate. 12.4 Minimize the visual impacts of utilitarian areas, such as mechanical equipment and trash storage. • Place mechanical equipment on the ground where it can be screened. • Mechanical equipment may only be mounted on a building on an alley façade. • Rooftop mechanical equipment or vents must be grouped together to minimize their visual impact. Where rooftop units are visible, it may be appropriate to provide screening with materials that are compatible with those of the building itself. Use the smallest, low profile units available for the purpose. • Window air conditioning units are not allowed. • Minimize the visual impacts of utility connections and service boxes. Group them in a discrete location. Use pedestals, when possible, rather than mounting on a historic building. • Paint mechanical equipment in a neutral color to minimize their appearance by blending with their backgrounds. • In general, mechanical equipment should be vented through the roof, rather than a wall, in a manner that has the least visual impact possible. • Avoid surface mounted conduit on historic structures. Staff Findings: Guidelines applicable to this level of review address Site Planning and Landscape, Building Materials, Windows, Roofs, Architectural Lighting, and Mechanical Equipment. Design Guideline 1.6 addresses new walkways on residential projects. A new walkway is proposed to wrap around the building on the southwest corner to provide access to the rear unit. There are two considerations to be addressed in the location of this walkway. First, a spruce is located on the southwest corner of the parcel and in order to protect the tree, the walkway must involve minimal excavation and must be a “floating” walk, where the slab rests on gravel, or another detail to be approved by Parks. In addition, staff is concerned that shoveling the walkway may lead to piling snow against the west side of the Pan Abode. It is recommended that a snow storage plan be developed, perhaps including signage directing residents to push shoveled snow to the northwest and southwest corners of 18 Exhibit A Minor Development Historic Preservation Design Guidelines Staff Findings 6 the site. As a standard condition of approval, and also to help mitigate the impact of piled or melting snow on the historic structure, a 1’ wide maintenance border filled with gravel is required around the perimeter of the Pan Abode. These topics are included as conditions of approval. Design Guideline 1.8 addresses stormwater mitigation. The applicant will need to continue working with all relevant City Departments to ensure that all requirements are met for this site regarding stormwater management. The applicant has provided details on the plans indicating a rain garden on the east half of the south, street facing, yard. The rain garden will consist of a 6’ by 4’ area at a full 1’ depression into the ground with a larger 12’ by 10’ area sloping into it. A bioswale seed mix is proposed to be planted in the rain garden. Staff recommends that the rain garden be restudied in order to lessen the maximum depth and the visual impact to the historic resource. Staff further suggests other actions on the site to manage stormwater and reduce the size of the rain garden, such as using permeable floating pavers for the proposed concrete walkway or including retention and treatment. Detailed plans providing context will be reviewed by staff and monitor prior to permit application. Design Guidelines 1.24, 1.25, and 1.27 address historically significant landscape features. Located on the northeast corner of the subject property is a tall metal pole atop which rests a circa 1960 emergency siren, indicated in the 630 W Main Street Architectural Inventory Form as a Darley Model 5 siren manufactured by the W. S. Darley Company of Chicago. This emergency siren is a significant historic object associated with the subject property and the Mountain Rescue Aspen efforts once housed at the subject property. It is currently non- functional, but this does not affect its association with the subject property. Staff recommends that the emergency siren be preserved in place. A condition of approval to preserve the emergency siren is included in the resolution. Design Guidelines 2.1 and 2.6 address the preservation of original materials and the removal of non-historic layers covering original material. Clapboard siding was applied to the east and west elevations of the historic Pan-Abode structure at an unknown date, likely around the time the rear addition was constructed in the 1980s. The applicant is proposing to remove the non- historic siding. Staff supports the restoration of the original material. As a condition, staff recommends a preservation plan be provided for review and approval by staff and monitor to address removal of non-historic clapboard siding and restoration/repair of original log. Design Guideline 2.2 addresses material finishes. The original stained wood has been previously painted. Staff provided a comment to the applicant suggesting taking the finish back to a stain, but it was indicated that this is outside the scope of their project. Staff further suggested a color scheme sympathetic to the original wood, with the addition differentiated in a darker color, in order for it to recede. No conditions will be placed regarding this as paint color is outside the purview of review, however staff does view this as a meaningful and achievable improvement to the reading of the historic resource vs. the addition and asks that 19 Exhibit A Minor Development Historic Preservation Design Guidelines Staff Findings 7 the applicant reconsider the proposal to paint the addition green, which would appear to call new attention to it. Design Guidelines 3.3, 3.5, and 3.6 address replacement windows. All of the windows on the historic resource appear to be replacements. The two windows on the east elevation were replaced in 2015; the front windows were modified from fixed frame to incorporating a casement on each side after 1975; and approved plans from 1989 indicate that the current fixed frame wire glass window was part of the 1989 addition updates. Currently windows on the historic resource are not proposed to be repaired or replaced. However, if glazing on the windows is found to be beyond repair staff recommends that historic photographs be consulted, and replacement windows match the original in material and configuration. Metal clad wood windows are not appropriate for replacement. Staff recommends that, if necessary, the applicant submits window specs for replacement windows on the historic resource to be approved by staff and monitor. Design Guideline 7.4 addresses vents and flues. The applicant has not provided information addressing vents or flues. Staff recommends that if new vents and flues are required that proposed locations avoid creating new penetrations on the walls of the historic resource. Staff recommends new penetrations occur on the non-historic addition, or if necessary, or on the roof of the historic resource. New vents and flues should be minimized, carefully placed, and painted a dark color in order to recede from view. Staff further recommends as a condition of approval that the applicant provide plans and elevations of the types and locations of new vents and flues for review and approval by staff and monitor prior to permit application. Design Guideline 7.10 addresses gutters. The proposed gutters are a K-style gutter and are to be painted to match the proposed trim color. The location of downspouts is proposed at the intersection of the historic resource and the addition, which will not obscure any architectural detailing on the historic resource. Staff finds that Design Guideline 7.10 is met and that the gutter proposal is considered appropriate by staff. Design Guideline 12.3 addresses exterior light fixtures. The proposed light fixtures are simple in character and are considered appropriate by staff. Design Guideline 12.4 addresses utilitarian areas/features. Meters: Although locations have not been provided on plans, the applicant has indicated in correspondence that the gas meter will be located on the east elevation of the addition, the water meter will be in the crawl space, and the electric meter will be located to the north side of the entry on the west elevation of the addition. The applicant has indicated that there are no plans to attach necessary meters to the historic building. Staff recommends locations be approved by staff and monitor prior to permit application. 20 Exhibit A Minor Development Historic Preservation Design Guidelines Staff Findings 8 Strobe and FDC Hookup: A strobe is indicated on the plan set on the east side of the front south, street facing elevation. Plans do not indicate the FDC hookup location. Staff finds that the proposed location for the strobe is sensitively placed. Staff further recommends that the strobe casing be white, to reduce contrast with the painted walls. Heat pumps: Two heat pumps are proposed to be mounted on the west elevation of the non-historic addition. They are not able to be placed on the alley side due to space constraints. The plans propose a 6’ wood slat fence with gate to screen the heat pumps from view from the south. The fence and gate are placed at the addition and the wood slat is sympathetic to the material of the resource. Staff finds that the placement and screening on the non-historic addition minimizes the impact of the heat pumps. Roof Snow Clips: A snow retention plan is required for the metal roofing, along areas where walkways are present. Staff has indicated to the applicant that snow clips of a color sympathetic to the current roofing are preferred. The snow retention plan will be reviewed by staff and monitor prior to permit application. Staff finds all relevant criterion to be met and recommends approval with conditions as listed in the resolution. 21 Exhibit B Growth Management Quota System Review Staff Findings 1 Growth Management Quota System. The HPC may approve, approve with conditions or deny and application for Growth Management Review based on the review criteria applicable to the specific type of development per Sec. 26.470.080. - General review standards. Sec. 26.470.080. - General review standards. A. Sufficient Allotments. Per Section 26.470.080.a, Sufficient growth management allotments are available to accommodate the proposed development, pursuant to Subsection 26.470.040(b). Applications for multi-year development allotment, pursuant to Paragraph 26.470.110(a) shall be required to meet this standard for the growth management years from which the allotments are requested. Staff Finding: The project scope is to change use from an Essential Public Facility development category to the Residential - Affordable Housing development category. For change of use, there is no annual limit for residential affordable housing development type. Staff finds this criterion to be met. B. Development Conformance. The proposed development conforms to the requirements and limitations of this Title, of the zone district or a site-specific development plan, any adopted regulatory master plan, as well as any previous approvals, including the Conceptual Historic Preservation Commission approval, the Conceptual Commercial Design Review approval and the Planned Development - Project Review approval, as applicable. Staff Finding: There are no proposed changes to the existing structure and it is currently in compliance with most of the 1989 PD approvals. Applicant is requesting amendment of side yard setbacks to memorialize the existing condition and a site-specific approval for one on-site parking space per unit as part of this application. Side yard setbacks as approved in the 1989 PD were memorialized as 5 feet. Applicant wishes to amend the side yard setback to 4.5 feet to better reflect existing conditions. Additionally, applicant proposed to amend dimensional standards to include a 6-foot heigh allowance on the east side to accommodate mechanical equipment. No site-specific development plans were part of the PD process when established. Staff finds this criterion to be met with the approved dimensional requirements represented in the chart included in the resolution. C. Public Infrastructure and Facilities. The proposed development shall upgrade public infrastructure and facilities necessary to serve the project. Improvements shall be at the sole costs of the developer. Public infrastructure includes, but is not limited to, water 22 Exhibit B Growth Management Quota System Review Staff Findings 2 supply, sewage treatment, energy and communication utilities, drainage control, fire and police protection, solid waste disposal, parking and road and transit services. Staff Finding: The project contains existing infrastructure, and any new infrastructure needs, such as new utility taps for the site, will comply with city standards. Staff finds this criterion to be met. D. Affordable Housing Mitigation. Affordable housing units that are being provided absent a requirement ("voluntary units") may be deed-restricted at any level of affordability, including residential occupied (RO). Staff Finding: As voluntary affordable housing, the project does not need to mitigate for employee generation. The applicant has the right to determine the category for the units. Staff finds this criterion to be met. E. Unless otherwise exempted in this Chapter, when a change in use between development categories is proposed, the employee mitigation shall be based on the use the development is converting to. For instance, if a commercial space is being converted to lodge units, the mitigation shall be based on the requirements for lodge space. Staff Finding: As voluntary affordable housing, the project does not need to mitigate for employee generation. This standard is not applicable. F. For free-market residential development, affordable housing net livable area shall be provided in an amount equal to at least thirty percent (30%) of the additional free-market residential net livable area. Staff Finding: The project does not include free-market residential development. This standard is not applicable. G. For essential public facility development, mitigation shall be determined based on Section 26.470.110(d). Staff Finding: The project does not include the development of new essential public facility space and does not need to mitigate for employee generation. 23 Exhibit B Growth Management Quota System Review Staff Findings 3 This standard is not applicable. H. For all affordable housing units that are being provided as mitigation pursuant to this Chapter or for the creation of a Certificate of Affordable Housing Credit pursuant to Chapter 26.540, or for any other reason: a.The proposed units comply with the Guidelines of the Aspen/Pitkin County Housing Authority, as amended. b.Required affordable housing may be provided through a mix of methods outlined in this Chapter, including newly built units, buy down units, certificates of affordable housing credit, or cash-in-lieu. c.Affordable housing that is in the form of newly built units or buy-down units shall be located on the same parcel as the proposed development or located off-site within the City limits. Units outside the City limits may be accepted as mitigation by the City Council, pursuant to Section 26.470.110(b). When off-site units within City limits are proposed, all requisite approvals shall be obtained prior to approval of the growth management application. d.Affordable housing mitigation in the form of a Certificate of Affordable Housing Credit, pursuant to Chapter 26.540, shall be extinguished pursuant to Section 26.540.120, Extinguishment and Re-Issuance of a Certificate, utilizing the calculations in Section 26.470.050(f), Employee/Square Footage Conversion. e.If the total mitigation requirement for a project is less than .25 FTEs, a cash-in- lieu payment may be made by right. If the total mitigation requirement for a project is .25 or more FTEs, a cash-in-lieu payment shall require City Council approval, pursuant to Section 26.470.110(c). f.Affordable housing units shall be approved pursuant to Paragraph 26.470.100(d), Affordable housing, and be restricted to a Category 4 rate as defined in the Aspen/Pitkin County Housing Authority Guidelines, as amended. An applicant may choose to provide mitigation units at a lower category designation. g.Each unit provided shall be designed such that the finished floor level of fifty percent (50%) or more of the unit's net livable area is at or above natural or finished grade, whichever is higher. This dimensional requirement may be varied through Special Review, Pursuant to Chapter 26.430. Staff Finding: Although the project is not being developed as mitigation or for the creation of housing credits, the applicant will comply with all APCHA guidelines. Before a Certificate of Occupancy is granted for the project, the applicant will work with APCHA to deed restrict each unit at the category deemed appropriate. Staff finds this criterion to be met with conditions included in the resolution. 24 Exhibit B Growth Management Quota System Review Staff Findings 4 Sec. 26.470.100. - Planning and zoning commission applications. The following types of development shall be approved, approved with conditions or denied by the Planning and Zoning Commission, pursuant to Section 26.470.060, Procedures for review, and the criteria for each type of development described below. Except as noted, all growth management applications shall comply with the general requirements of Section 26.470.080. Except as noted, the following types of growth management approvals shall be deducted from the annual development allotments. Approvals apply cumulatively. A. Change in use. A change in use of an existing property, structure or portions of an existing structure between the development categories identified in Section 26.470.020 (irrespective of direction), for which a certificate of occupancy has been issued and which is intended to be reused, shall be approved, approved with conditions or denied by the Planning and Zoning Commission based on the general requirements outlined in Section 26.470.080. No more than one (1) free-market residential unit may be created through the change-in-use. Staff Finding: The Public zone district allows affordable housing as a Conditional Use, which will be a change of use from Essential Public Facility to affordable housing. The subject property is surrounded by the Mixed-Use zone district on the east and west sides of the building as well as across Main Street. Across the alley, the properties are located within a residential zone district, R-6. Residential uses surround the subject property. Staff finds the proposed residential use to be consistent with surrounding uses, and affordable housing is consistent with the quasi- governmental uses of the Public zone district. Staff Finds this criterion to be met. C. Affordable Housing. The development of affordable housing that does not qualify for administrative review and approval under the criteria established in Section 26.470.090(c), shall be approved, approved with conditions, or denied by the Planning and Zoning Commission based on the general requirements outlined in Section 26.470.080, and all other applicable review criteria of this Title. If the affordable housing project is located in a historic district or on a historically designated property, the Historic Preservation Commission is the review body for this review. Additionally, the following shall apply to all affordable housing development: (1)The proposed units shall be deed-restricted as "for sale" units and transferred to qualified purchasers according to the Aspen Pitkin County Housing Authority Regulations. The developer of the project may be entitled to select the first purchasers, subject to the aforementioned qualifications, pursuant to the Aspen Pitkin County Housing Authority Regulations. The deed restriction shall authorize the Aspen Pitkin County Housing Authority or the City to own the unit and rent it to qualified renters as defined in the Aspen Pitkin County Housing Authority Regulations, as amended. 25 Exhibit B Growth Management Quota System Review Staff Findings 5 (2)The proposed units may be rental units, including but not limited to rental units owned by an employer, government or quasi-government institution, or non-profit organization if a legal instrument in a form acceptable to the City Attorney ensures permanent affordability of the units. The City encourages affordable housing associated for lodge development to be rental units associated with the lodge operation and contributing to the long-term viability of the lodge. (3)A combination of "for sale" and rental units is permitted. Staff Finding: APCHA provided referral comments for this review. A deed restriction shall be recorded on the property allow for each of the two units to be either rental or ownership units. All potential buyers/tenants of the units must get approval as a qualified Pitkin County employee through APCHA and units shall be designated between Category 1 and RO. Staff finds this criterion to be met with conditions included in the resolution. 26 Exhibit C Planned Development Project Review Staff Findings 1 26.445.110.D. Minor Amendment to a Project Review approval. An amendment found by the Community Development Director to be generally consistent with the allowances and limitations of a Project Review approval or which otherwise represents an insubstantial change but which does not meet the established thresholds for an insubstantial amendment, may be approved, approved with conditions or denied by the City Council. 26.445.050. Project Review Standards. The Project Review shall focus on the general concept for the development and shall outline any dimensional requirements that vary from those allowed in the underlying zone district. The burden shall rest upon an applicant to show the reasonableness of the development application and its conformity to the standards and procedures of this Chapter and this Title. The underlying zone district designation shall be used as a guide, but not an absolute limitation, to the dimensions which may be considered during the development review process. Any dimensional variations allowed shall be specified in the ordinance granting Project Approval. In the review of a development application for a Project Review, the Planning and Zoning Commission or the Historic Preservation Commission, as applicable, and City Council shall consider the following: A. Compliance with Adopted Regulatory Plans. The proposed development complies with applicable adopted regulatory plans. Staff Finding: The applicant is in compliance with adopted regulatory plans. 630 W. Main Street is a one-story log kit building Pan Abode constructed in 1965-1966 for meeting and training space, along with a 1989-1990 addition for equipment storage use by Mountain Rescue Aspen. The property is owned by the City of Aspen and is a historic landmark designated property. In 1989 the Aspen City Council approved Ordinance No. 34, Series of 1989, and the property was rezoned from Office, now classified as Mixed Use, to Public (PUB), to ensure that Mountain Rescue operated as a permitted use and that an expansion of 1,145 square feet was possible. Per HPC meeting minutes from June 14, 1989, the HPC approved this change of use and addition. A change of use from Public/essential Facility to Affordable Housing is appropriate and allowed per underlying zoning. The PUB zone, by its nature, is scattered throughout the community, surrounded by residential, commercial and lodge land uses. The neighborhood in the vicinity of the subject property includes both residential and commercial uses of varying intensities. A multifamily structure is found immediately to the west of the property, while the rest of the block consists of older, one-story residences. The applicant' s proposal of a residential duplex is in keeping with this diverse neighborhood and is an appropriate use for the property. Staff finds the change in use is consistent with those uses in the vicinity of the site. No dimensional changes to the building are proposed as a part of this request. Staff finds this criterion to be met. B. Development Suitability. The proposed Planned Development prohibits development on land unsuitable for development because of natural or man-made hazards affecting the property, including flooding, mudflow, debris flow, fault ruptures, landslides, rock or soil creep, rock falls, rock slides, mining activity including mine waste deposit, avalanche or snowslide areas, slopes in excess of 30%, and any other natural or man-made hazard or condition that could harm the health, safety, or welfare 27 Exhibit C Planned Development Project Review Staff Findings 2 of the community. Affected areas may be accepted as suitable for development if adequate mitigation techniques acceptable to the City Engineer are proposed in compliance with Title 29 – Engineering Design Standards. Conceptual plans for mitigation techniques may be accepted for this standard. The City Engineer may require specific designs, mitigation techniques, and implementation timelines be defined as part of the Detailed Review and documented within a Development Agreement. Staff Finding: No new buildings are proposed. Staff finds this criterion is not applicable. C. Site Planning. The site plan is compatible with the context and visual character of the area. In meeting this standard, the following criteria shall be used: 1. The site plan responds to the site’s natural characteristics and physical constraints such as steep slopes, vegetation, waterways, and any natural or man-made hazards and allows development to blend in with or enhance said features. 2. The project preserves important geologic features, mature vegetation, and structures or features of the site that have historic, cultural, visual, or ecological importance or contribute to the identity of the town. 3. Buildings are oriented to public streets and are sited to reflect the neighborhood context. Buildings and access ways are arranged to allow effective emergency, maintenance, and service vehicle access. Staff Finding: No new buildings are proposed, and historic resources will be preserved in order to continue contributions towards the identity of the city. Staff finds this criterion is met. D. Dimensions. All dimensions, including density, mass, and height shall be established during the Project Review. A development application may request variations to any dimensional requirement of this Title. In meeting this standard, consideration shall be given to the following criteria: 1. There exists a significant community goal to be achieved through such variations. 2. The proposed dimensions represent a character suitable for and indicative of the primary uses of the project. 3. The project is compatible with or enhances the cohesiveness or distinctive identity of the neighborhood and surrounding development patterns, including the scale and massing of nearby historical or cultural resources. 4. The number of off-street parking spaces shall be established based on the probable number of cars to be operated by those using the proposed development and the nature of the proposed uses. The availability of public transit and other transportation facilities, including those for pedestrian access and/or the commitment to utilize automobile 28 Exhibit C Planned Development Project Review Staff Findings 3 disincentive techniques in the proposed development, and the potential for joint use of common parking may be considered when establishing a parking requirement. 5. The Project Review approval, at City Council’s discretion, may include specific allowances for dimensional flexibility between Project Review and Detailed Review. Changes shall be subject to the amendment procedures of Section 26.445.110 – Amendments. Staff Finding: The project is proposing one hundred (100) percent affordable housing. One hundred percent affordable housing development is a high priority and meets community needs. This development is consistent with the residential uses surrounding the project location and is suitable for redevelopment as an affordable housing duplex. In 1989 the Aspen City Council approved Ordinance No. 34, Series of 1989, and the property was rezoned from Office, now classified as Mixed Use, to Public (PUB), to ensure that Mountain Rescue operated as a permitted use and that an expansion of 1,145 square feet was possible. At the time, the rezoning to PUB included a requirement to set dimensional requirements per Section 5-220.D of the Aspen Land Use Regulations through establishing a Planned Development (PD). The following dimensional requirements were established for this site in 1989 and have not been amended since: Minimum lot size: 3,000 sq. ft. Minimum lot area per dwelling unit: not applicable Minimum lot width: 30 ft. Minimum front yard setback: 19 ft. Minimum rear yard setback: 9 ft. Minimum side yard setback: 5 ft. Maximum height: 20 ft. Minimum distance between principal and accessory building: not applicable Percent of open space required for building site: no requirement External floor area ratio: 0. 75: 1 Internal floor area ratio: no requirement. These requirements were based on the most stringent requirements based on the surrounding Office zone district, now Mixed Use zone district. Some changes to setback’s were approved to accommodate the storage and equipment for rescue operations. The applicant requests to change the dimensional requirements for the side yard setback and rear yard setback to better reflex existing conditions based on an updated survey. The applicant requests a change from a 5 ft to a 4.5 ft side yard setback and a change from a 9 ft to an 8 ft rear yard setback. The addition of the dimensional standard of 6-ft in height for mechanical equipment on the east side of the non-historic addition is proposed to be memorialized for the inclusion of a mini-split for the duplex. The applicant will screen the mechanical equipment using a 6 ft fence. The applicant proposes the following dimensional requirements as part of the Minor Amendment to the PD Detailed Review: Minimum lot size: 3,000 sq. ft. Minimum lot area per dwelling unit: not applicable Minimum lot width: 30 ft. Minimum front yard setback: 19 ft. 29 Exhibit C Planned Development Project Review Staff Findings 4 Minimum rear yard setback: 8 ft. Minimum side yard setback: 4.5 ft. Maximum height for mechanical equipment on east side yard: 6 ft. Maximum height: 20 ft. Minimum distance between principal and accessory building: not applicable Percent of open space required for building site: no requirement External floor area ratio: 0. 75: 1 Internal floor area ratio: no requirement. The applicant is not proposing expansion of interior floor area, therefore there will be no changes to the size of the structure. The update to dimensional requirements reflects a more accurate account of the existing structure and setbacks and the changes are intended to best reflect the on-site condition. The PD approved parking for two vehicles, two snow mobiles and a trailer in the garage while an on-street parking space was designated for Mountain Rescue’s third vehicle in 1989. By converting the use to a duplex, and by amending the PD to update dimensional requirements, the applicant proposes PD amendments also account for parking in that the inclusion of on-site specific parking to be one (1) per unit. Site-specific dimensions, such as parking and setbacks, may be granted through the PD. The existing garage can accommodate two vehicles, one for each unit. Due to the limited distance between the garage and alley property line, the provision of tandem parking, as it was approved for Aspen Mountain Rescue in 1989, is not feasible. Additionally, multi-family development in this vicinity is permitted a parking ratio of one parking space per unit, which is the same as what is being requested. The location: close to transit, walkable to downtown, and with easy access to the city’s trail system provides great multi-modal options to get around town. Both the multi- modal opportunities and parking ratio for multi-family development provide a reasonable basis to grant the parking request of one off-street parking space per dwelling unit for this site-specific development. Staff finds this criterion is met with conditions included in the resolution. E. Design Standards. The design of the proposed development is compatible with the context and visual character of the area. In meeting this standard, the following criteria shall be used: 1. The design complies with applicable design standards, including those outlined in Chapter 26.410, Residential Design Standards, Chapter 26.412, Commercial Design Standards, and Chapter 26.415, Historic Preservation. 2. The proposed materials are compatible with those called for in any applicable design standards, as well as those typically seen in the immediate vicinity. Exterior materials are finalized during Detailed Review, but review boards may set forth certain expectations or conditions related to architectural character and exterior materials during Project Review. Staff Finding: The proposed application is exempt from Residential Design Standards and is subject to compliance with the Historic Preservation Design Guidelines. No new exterior materials are proposed, and architectural character shall remain as is currently. 30 Exhibit C Planned Development Project Review Staff Findings 5 Staff finds this criterion is met with conditions included in the resolution. F. Pedestrian, bicycle & transit facilities. The development improves pedestrian, bicycle, and transit facilities. These facilities and improvements shall be prioritized over vehicular facilities and improvements. Any vehicular access points, or curb cuts, minimize impacts on existing or proposed pedestrian, bicycle, and transit facilities. The City may require specific designs, mitigation techniques, and implementation timelines be defined as part of the Detailed Review and documented within a Development Agreement. Staff Finding: The development is existing with already located bicycle parking and is adjacent to a public transit facility. These standards are not applicable. G. Engineering Design Standards. There has been accurate identification of engineering design and mitigation techniques necessary for development of the project to comply with the applicable requirements of Municipal Code Title 29 – Engineering Design Standards and the City of Aspen Urban Runoff Management Plan (URMP) and Water Efficient Landscape Ordinance. The City Engineer may require specific designs, mitigation techniques, and implementation timelines be defined and documented within a Development Agreement. Staff Finding: Landscape updates include 1-foot depth of grading on the south, street-facing façade of the property for the use of a rain garden to meet stormwater management standards under Title 29. The addition of a concrete sidewalk on the south and west side of the structure will be added 1- foot from the resource. Parks has approved the possibility of a floating sidewalk to avoid the dripline from the pine in the SW corner of the property. Changes to landscape design and final design may be approved by staff and monitor and set as a condition of approval. Staff finds this criterion is met with conditions included in the resolution. H. Public Infrastructure and Facilities. The proposed Planned Development shall upgrade public infrastructure and facilities necessary to serve the project. Improvements shall be at the sole costs of the developer. The City Engineer may require specific designs, mitigation techniques, and implementation timelines be defined as part of the Detailed Review and documented within a Development Agreement. Staff Finding: The City Park’s Department provided referral comments for this review and has agreed to remove one apple tree within the right-of-way adjacent to the property and to plant two new trees for which the city will install an irrigation system to maintain watering. Staff finds this criterion to be met with conditions included in the resolution. I. Access and Circulation. The proposed development shall have perpetual unobstructed legal vehicular access to a public way. A proposed Planned Development shall not eliminate or obstruct legal access from a public way to an adjacent property. All streets in a Planned Development retained under private ownership shall be dedicated to public use to ensure 31 Exhibit C Planned Development Project Review Staff Findings 6 adequate public and emergency access. Security/privacy gates across access points and driveways are prohibited. Staff Finding: The 1989 PD approved parking for two vehicles, two snow mobiles and a trailer in the garage while an on-street parking space was designated for Mountain Rescue’s third vehicle in 1989. By converting the use to a duplex, and by amending the PD to update dimensional requirements, the applicant proposes PD amendments also account for parking in that the inclusion of on-site specific parking to be one (1) per unit. Site-specific dimensions, such as parking, height, and setbacks, may be granted through the PD. The existing garage can accommodate two vehicles, one for each unit. Due to the limited distance between the garage and alley property line, the provision of tandem parking, as it was approved for Aspen Mountain Rescue in 1989, is not feasible. Additionally, multi-family development in this vicinity is permitted a parking ratio of one parking space per unit, which is the same as what is being requested. The location: close to transit, walkable to downtown, and with easy access to the city’s trail system provides great multi-modal options to get around town. Both the multi-modal opportunities and parking ratio for multi-family development provide a reasonable basis to grant the parking request of one off-street parking space per dwelling unit for this site-specific development. Staff finds this criterion is met with conditions included in the resolution. 32 Exhibit D Conditional Use Review Staff Findings 1 Conditional Use. When considering a development application for a conditional use, the Historic Preservation Commission shall consider whether all of the following standards are met, as applicable. 26.425.040. Standards applicable to all conditional uses. A. The conditional use is consistent with the intent of the Zone District in which it is proposed to be located and complies with all other applicable requirements of this Title. Staff Finding: The Public zone district allows affordable housing as a conditional use. The subject property is surrounded by the Mixed-Use zone district on the east and west sides of the building as well as across Main Street. Across the alley, the properties are located within a residential zone district, R-6. Residential uses surround the subject property. Staff finds the proposed residential use to be consistent with surrounding uses, and affordable housing is consistent with the quasi- governmental uses of the Public zone district. Staff finds this criterion to be met. B. The conditional use is compatible with the mix of development in the immediate vicinity of the parcel in terms of density, height, bulk, architecture, landscaping, and open space, as well as with any applicable adopted regulatory master plan. Staff Finding: The building’s density, height, and bulk is not being changed. The main component of the project is an interior remodel and minor changes to fenestration. Landscape updates include an accessible walkway on the west side of the building and a rain garden on the front, street-facing lawn, to meet stormwater management needs per Title 29. The existing structure has been in place since the late eighties and has historically been considered compatible with other development in the area and meets the standard. There is no master plan for the parcel. Staff finds this criterion to be met. C. The conditional use is consistent and compatible with the character of the immediate vicinity of the parcel proposed for development and surrounding land uses and enhances the mixture of complimentary uses and activities in the immediate vicinity of the parcel proposed for development. Staff Finding: The building mass and scale are unchanged and residential uses surround this site. Using this site residentially as a duplex is consistent and compatible with surrounding character and uses, meeting the standard. Staff finds this criterion to be met. D. The location, size, design and operating characteristics of the proposed conditional use minimizes adverse effects, including visual impacts, impacts on pedestrian and vehicular circulation, parking, trash, service delivery, noise, vibrations and odor on surrounding properties; and 33 Exhibit D Conditional Use Review Staff Findings 2 Staff Finding: Three bedrooms are proposed between the two dwelling units, minimizing the potential number of occupants of the units. The property will accommodate two parking spaces with alley access, one for each unit, minimizing the impacts on the neighborhood. The location is close to transit, walkable to downtown and provides easy access to the city’s trail system. Multi-modal options for getting around town are very accessible at this location on Main Street. Additionally, trash services will be maintained in the garage minimizing visual impacts. Overall, the remodel will minimize adverse effects on surrounding properties. Staff finds this criterion to be met. E. There are adequate public facilities and services to serve the conditional use including but not limited to roads, potable water, sewer, solid waste, parks, police, fire protection, emergency medical services, hospital and medical services, drainage systems and schools; and Staff Finding: Updated fire protection, specifically fire department connection (FDC) hook-up and strobe will be integrated into the updates. This location shall be determined and submitted at building permit. Otherwise, the existing building is currently served with adequate public facilities. Staff Finds this criterion to be met. F. The applicant commits to supply affordable housing to meet the incremental need for increased employees generated by the conditional use. Staff Finding: The proposal is to create voluntary affordable housing and does not generate employees. This standard is not applicable. G. The Community Development Director may recommend and the Planning and Zoning Commission may impose such conditions on a conditional use that are necessary to maintain the integrity of the City's Zone Districts and to ensure the conditional use complies this Chapter and this Title; is compatible with surrounding land uses; and is served by adequate public facilities. This includes, but is not limited to, imposing conditions on size, bulk, location, open space, landscaping, buffering, lighting, signage, off-street parking and other similar design features, the construction of public facilities to serve the conditional use and limitations on the operating characteristics, hours of operation and duration of the conditional use. Staff Finding: As an existing building since 1966, the structure has fit within the neighborhood in its current condition for over fifty years. The change in use to residential will include the provision of off-street parking, meet the adequate trash storage, and utility upgrades for the new use. Staff Finds this criterion to be met. 34 Page 1 | 5 Capital Asset Department March 31, 2023 Ms. Amy Simon Community Development Department City of Aspen 130 S. Galena St. Aspen, Co 81611 RE: 630 W. Main Street – Development of Affordable Housing Dear Ms. Simon: Please accept this application for a Certificate of Appropriateness for Minor Development and other associated land use reviews, as well as combining and consolidation of development applications, to convert the existing building known as 630 W. Main Street into two affordable housing units. The resulting duplex will add affordable housing stock to the city’s inventory, increasing its ability to house its employees. The building is currently used to house city offices and is considered an Essential Public Facility. Due to the proposed conversion of the offices into affordable housing, a number of land use reviews are being requested for approval. Background: 630 W. Main Street sits on a 3,000 sq. ft. lot with residential neighbors located on either side of the property. A pedestrian sidewalk fronts the property and RFTA bus service is frequent, with an outbound stop on the block face. Hyman Ave. provides the nearest designated bike route in the summer. 630 W. Main Street is located within the Main Street Historic District and is a designated landmark. Prior to housing city offices the building was home to Mountain Rescue. The original structure is a Pan Abode, a log kit building, an architectural style identified under the Aspen Modern preservation program. 35 Page 2 | 5 The original Pan Abode is a one-story structure approximately 20 ft. by 30 ft. at the front with a 20 ft. by 42 ½ ft., two story addition at the rear. The kit building was constructed for Mountain Rescue in 1965- 1966 and the addition was built in 1989-1990. In 1989 the property was rezoned from Office (now Mixed- Use) to Public (PUB), ensuring that Mountain Rescue operated as a permitted use. Most of Main Street is zoned Mixed Use (MU), allowing for a mix of commercial and residential uses. As part of the application from the eighties, a rear addition was approved through the Planned Development process and dimensional standards were approved for the project (Table 1 below). Today, all dimensions associated with a project in the PUB zone district are set by the adoption of a ‘Final Planned Development’ and affordable housing is a Conditional Use within the zone district. Table 1: 1989 PD Dimensional Requirements Standard Dimension Minimum Lot Size 3,000 sq. ft. Minimum Lot Width 30 ft. Minimum Front Yard Setback 19 ft. Side Yard Setback 5 ft. Rear Yard Setback 9 ft. Maximum Height 20 ft. Floor Area Ratio .75:1 or 2,250 sq. ft. Parking was proposed to be four spaces, “intended to accommodate the operation’s three vehicles, two snow mobiles and trailer.” Mountain Rescue’s application noted one space was along Main Street, so two vehicles were accommodated in the garage. This is confirmed by meeting minutes of the Planning and Zoning Commission (May 16, 1989). Proposal: The Applicant is proposing to convert the space within the existing shell of the building into an affordable housing duplex. The Pan Abode will house a one-bedroom dwelling and a small portion of the rear addition will be incorporated into the unit to accommodate a closet and stackable washer/dryer. The second unit will have access from the rear addition’s existing side door on the west side of the property. The bulk of the unit will be on the second story, above the garage and is proposed to contain two bedrooms. Both units will share use of the garage, with each having a dedicated off-street parking stall. Minimal changes to the exterior of the building are planned, with only changes to the fenestration on the addition (removal, addition and reconfiguration of windows) and the installation of gutters being proposed on the building to better handle drainage. With regard to the yard and landscape, an exterior, accessible route is required and is proposed on the west side of the property. The front lawn area is proposed to be maintained. Land Use Approvals Requested: To develop the proposed deed restricted duplex within the existing shell of the building, multiple land use approvals are requested: • Conditional Use approval to allow the development of affordable housing in the Public zone district. • Amendment to the Planned Development allowing for the reconfirmation of the dimensional standards of the project, as necessary, and requesting the parking standard be set at one off- street parking space per dwelling unit. 36 Page 3 | 5 • Growth Management for the development of two affordable housing units and a Change in Use from an Essential Public Facility to Residential – affordable housing. • Certificate of Appropriateness for Minor Development as a landmarked structure. Granting of a Conditional Use is required in the Public zone district to allow for the development of affordable housing. The intent of Conditional Use review is to allow for land uses “which are generally compatible with the other permitted uses in a Zone District, but may require individual review” of aspects of the specific use proposed. The request is to allow an affordable housing duplex in the Public zone district. The subject lot is surrounded by residential uses on either side and across the alley in the form of multi-family development, two detached residences and single-family homes. The existing shell of the building is proposed to be maintained and the interior converted into a duplex, so the building footprint and mass will be the same as it has been since the late 1980s. The residential use is ‘compatible with the surrounding mix of development in the immediate vicinity’ and ‘minimizes adverse effects’ on the neighborhood by proposing two, modestly sized dwelling units that will maintain the existing mass of the building and provide on-site parking for each dwelling. Applicant is confident the Conditional Use standards are met to allow for affordable housing at this site. The Public Zone district requires any development to be memorialized in a site-specific approval via a Planned Development. This occurred in 1989 with a land use application to rezone the subject property from Office (now Mixed-Use) to Public and included the review of the rear addition to the Pan Abode. As noted in Table 1, the dimensions were set based on the proposed redevelopment and the parking needs of Mountain Rescue. The parking was approved in 1989 to accommodate two vehicles, two snow mobiles and trailer in the garage while an on-street parking space was designated for Mountain Rescue’s third vehicle. With the survey of the property (Exhibit 3), some minor changes to the 1989 approved dimensions are necessary to account for existing conditions. The applicant requests: • a variation of the parking ratio through Planned Development review to accommodate the residential use. Specifically, applicant requests a parking ratio of one off-street parking space per dwelling unit; and, • amendment of the side and rear yard setbacks to reflect existing conditions, per Table 2, below. Table 2: Proposed PD Dimensional Requirements Standard 1989 Dimension 2023 Proposed Dimension Minimum Lot Size 3,000 sq. ft. No change Minimum Lot Width 30 ft. No change Minimum Front Yard Setback 19 ft. No change Side Yard Setback 5 ft. 4.5 feet Rear Yard Setback 9 ft. 8 feet Maximum Height 20 ft. 20 feet Floor Area Ratio .75:1 or 2,250 sq. ft. No change Parking See Table 1 one off-street parking space per dwelling unit 37 Page 4 | 5 Currently, the parking requirement for a duplex is one parking space per bedroom or a maximum of two parking spaces per unit. With three bedrooms proposed between the two units, the land use code requires a total of three off-street parking spaces. However, site-specific dimensions may be granted through the Planned Development. The proposed duplex provides two, modestly sized affordable housing units within the existing structure. The existing garage can accommodate two vehicles, one for each unit. Due to the limited distance between the garage and alley property line, the provision of tandem parking is not feasible. The location: close to transit, walkable to downtown, and with easy access to the city’s trail system provides great multi-modal options to get around town. Additionally, multi-family development in this vicinity is permitted a parking ratio of one parking space per unit, which is the same as what is being requested. Both the multi-modal opportunities and parking ratio for multi-family development provide a reasonable basis to grant the parking request of one off- street parking space per dwelling unit for this site-specific development. The provision of affordable housing is a ‘significant community goal’ and the granting of the parking variation assists in the development of the housing. Applicant believes the requested parking ratio can be justified based on the ‘availability of public transit and other transportation facilities, including those for pedestrian access’ nearby and believes the other dimensional requests are inconsequential in nature, reflecting existing conditions. Regarding the Growth Management Quota System, the conversion of the building into a duplex requires approval of a Change in Use from the Essential Public Facility development category to the Residential- Affordable Housing development category. Additionally, the development of Affordable Housing is reviewed under certain criteria. As voluntary affordable housing units, no mitigation for employee generation is required. There are some standards associated with the development of affordable housing that discuss requirements for the type (for sale or rental) and design of the unit. As government owned housing, the units can be deed restricted at any income category and may be for-sale or rent. The income category deed restriction is proposed to be fluid and dependent on what APCHA income category the proposed occupant meets prior to occupancy of the unit and will be either for sale or rental depending on the city’s needs at the time of occupancy. Each unit is required to have ‘the finished floor level of fifty (50) percent or more of the unit's net livable area is at or above natural or finished grade’ and both units meet this standard. The one bedroom unit is proposed at 518 sq. ft. of net livable area, while the second story unit is proposed at 939 sq. ft.. The Pan Abode meets APCHA’s minimum square footage requirement for a studio (500 sq. ft.) rather than a 1-bedroom, housing 1.25 Full Time Equivalents (FTEs), while the two-bedroom unit exceeds 1 the size requirement of 900 sq. ft., housing 2.25 FTEs. A total of 3.5 FTEs are housed by this project. Both units will include the required appliances such as a washer and dryer and will share use of the garage. Both units meet the design and operational criteria for the development of voluntary affordable housing by a governmental entity. As a historically designated structure, the application requires the granting of a Certificate of Appropriateness for Minor Development. There are limited changes proposed to the existing building. The scope of work on the exterior of the building and within the yard include: adding gutters to the 1 A portion of the ground level entry of the 2-bedroom unit may be redesigned as dedicated storage within the shared garage for the 1-bedroom unit. In no case will the net livable sq. ft. of the 2-bedroom be less than 900 sq. ft.. 38 Page 5 | 5 building (including the Pan Abode), installing new, additional fenestration to the rear addition and modifying the configuration of certain existing windows. An accessible walkway will be added along the western side of the building. Only the addition of, and modification to, windows on the rear addition are applicable to the Residential Design Standards. Regarding window modification, two sets of new windows are proposed on the upper story of the rear addition on the eastern facade, one window on the ground floor of the rear addition is removed and a set of new windows is added on the second story of the addition’s west façade. The existing full-length windows on the alley are replaced with windows that are shorter and wider. No non- orthogonal windows are proposed. The required accessible walkway, to be located along the west property line, is proposed to be simple in design and is required per building code. The open, grass covered front yard is to be maintained. By focusing mainly on the remodel of the interior of the structure, the historic development pattern is maintained, original building materials are preserved, as well as the Pan Abode’s original architectural features such as the porch, roof form and eave depth. Applicant believes the proposed scope meets the historic preservation guidelines. It is important to note that recent changes to the land use code have been implemented to encourage the development of affordable housing. The conversion of the building to housing is completely voluntary and will provide additional, deed restricted units that will be occupied by year-round occupants and assists with housing the local workforce. Additional square footage is not being developed on the site as the existing footprint is being reconfigured and will have no changed massing impacts to adjacent neighbors or the streetscape. The new, modestly sized units, while creating new housing inventory, will also accommodate off-street parking and includes easy access to multi-modal travel modes. Applicant respectively requests approval of Conditional Use, Planned Development, Growth Management, and Certificate of Appropriateness for Minor Development land use reviews to convert the building into affordable housing. Sincerely, Jen Phelan Jennifer Phelan Development Manager Attachments: Exhibit 1. Review criteria Exhibit 2. Plan set Exhibit 3. Survey Exhibit 4. General land use packet Exhibit 5. Pre-application summary Exhibit 6. Fee waiver form Exhibit 7. Internal funds transfer form 39 EXHIBIT 1: Review Criteria Chapter 26.425: Conditional Use (Sec. 26.425.040. - Standards applicable to all conditional uses) When considering a development application for a conditional use, the Planning and Zoning Commission shall consider whether all of the following standards are met, as applicable. (a) The conditional use is consistent with the intent of the Zone District in which it is proposed to be located and complies with all other applicable requirements of this Title; and Applicant response: The Public zone district allows affordable housing as a conditional use. The subject property is surrounded by the Mixed-Use zone district on the east and west sides of the building as well as across Main Street. Across the alley, the properties are located within a residential zone district. Residential uses surround the subject property. Applicant believes the proposed residential use is consistent with surrounding uses and affordable housing, in particular, meets the quasi-governmental uses of the zone district. (b) The conditional use is compatible with the mix of development in the immediate vicinity of the parcel in terms of density, height, bulk, architecture, landscaping, and open space, as well as with any applicable adopted regulatory master plan. Applicant response: The building’s mass is not being changed. Some minor changes to the rear addition, such as fenestration changes, are proposed. The main component of the project is an interior remodel. An accessible route will be added on the west side of the building. The existing condition has been in place since the late eighties and has historically been considered compatible with other development in the area and meets the standard. (c) The conditional use is consistent and compatible with the character of the immediate vicinity of the parcel proposed for development and surrounding land uses and enhances the mixture of complimentary uses and activities in the immediate vicinity of the parcel proposed for development; and Applicant response: Like the review criteria above, the building mass and scale are unchanged and residential uses surround this site. Using this site residentially as a duplex is consistent and compatible with surrounding character and uses, meeting the standard. (d) The location, size, design and operating characteristics of the proposed conditional use minimizes adverse effects, including visual impacts, impacts on pedestrian and vehicular circulation, parking, trash, service delivery, noise, vibrations and odor on surrounding properties; and Applicant response: Three bedrooms are proposed between the two dwelling units, minimizing the potential number of occupants of the units. The property will accommodate two parking spaces with alley access, one for each unit, minimizing the impacts on the neighborhood. The location is close to transit, walkable to downtown and provides easy access to the city’s trail system. Multi-modal options for getting around town are very accessible at this location on Main Street. Additionally, trash services will be maintained in the garage minimizing visual impacts. Overall, the remodel will minimize adverse effects on surrounding properties. 40 EXHIBIT 1: Review Criteria (e) There are adequate public facilities and services to serve the conditional use including but not limited to roads, potable water, sewer, solid waste, parks, police, fire protection, emergency medical services, hospital and medical services, drainage systems and schools; and Applicant response: The existing building is currently served with adequate public facilities. Any upgrades in utilities will occur with the remodel as necessary, meeting the standard. (f) The applicant commits to supply affordable housing to meet the incremental need for increased employees generated by the conditional use; and Applicant response: The proposal is to create voluntary affordable housing and does not generate employees. This standard is not applicable to the request. (g) The Community Development Director may recommend and the Planning and Zoning Commission may impose such conditions on a conditional use that are necessary to maintain the integrity of the City's Zone Districts and to ensure the conditional use complies this Chapter and this Title; is compatible with surrounding land uses; and is served by adequate public facilities. This includes, but is not limited to, imposing conditions on size, bulk, location, open space, landscaping, buffering, lighting, signage, off-street parking and other similar design features, the construction of public facilities to serve the conditional use and limitations on the operating characteristics, hours of operation and duration of the conditional use. Applicant response: As an existing building, the structure has fit within the neighborhood in its current condition for over thirty years. The change in use to residential will include the provision of off-street parking, meet the outdoor lighting standard, provide adequate trash storage, and utility upgrades for the building. Chapter 26.445: Planned Development (Sec. 26.445.110. - Amendments. Planned Development) (e) Minor Amendment to a Detailed Review approval. An amendment found by the Community Development Director consistent with a Project Review approval and to be generally consistent with the allowances and limitations of a Detailed Review approval, or which otherwise represents an insubstantial change, but which does not meet the established thresholds for an insubstantial amendment, may be approved, approved with conditions or denied by the Planning and Zoning Commission or the Historic Preservation Commission as applicable, pursuant to 26.445.040(b)(3) - Step Three. Sec. 26.445.050. – Project Review Standards (specific to off-street parking). (d) Dimensions. All dimensions, including density, mass, and height shall be established during the Project Review. A development application may request variations to any dimensional requirement of this Title. In meeting this standard, consideration shall be given to the following criteria: (1) There exists a significant community goal to be achieved through such variations. Applicant response: Applicant is requesting establishment of a site-specific approval that memorializes the existing conditions regarding setbacks and allow a variation of the off-street parking requirement for this project. The parking request is for one off-street parking space per dwelling unit, which will require a total of two parking spaces for the project, rather than the existing requirement of one space per bedroom or a maximum of two parking spaces per unit. 41 EXHIBIT 1: Review Criteria The provision of affordable housing is a significant goal for the community and this project remodels an existing structure, providing both benefits and some limitations with the redevelopment. Providing deed restricted affordable housing meets this standard. (2) The proposed dimensions represent a character suitable for and indicative of the primary uses of the project. Applicant response: The proposed duplex provides two, modest affordable housing units (+500 sq. ft. and +900 sq. ft. in net livable area). Besides memorializing the existing dimensional condition of the structure, the parking ratio of one space per unit provides a parking standard that is generally applicable to any multi-family project on Main Street, such as the adjacent building just west of the Main St. cabin. (3) The project is compatible with or enhances the cohesiveness or distinctive identity of the neighborhood and surrounding development patterns, including the scale and massing of nearby historical or cultural resources. Applicant response: Applicant is requesting establishment of a site-specific approval that memorializes the existing conditions regarding setbacks. The building, in its current form, has existed for over thirty years with a scale that is compatible with development on Main Street, meeting the review standard. (4) The number of off-street parking spaces shall be established based on the probable number of cars to be operated by those using the proposed development and the nature of the proposed uses. The availability of public transit and other transportation facilities, including those for pedestrian access and/or the commitment to utilize automobile disincentive techniques in the proposed development, and the potential for joint use of common parking may be considered when establishing a parking requirement. Applicant response: The proposed duplex provides two, modestly sized affordable housing units within the existing structure. The existing garage can accommodate two vehicles, one for each unit. Due to the limited distance between the garage and alley property line, the provision of additional tandem parking is not feasible. The location: close to transit, walkable to downtown, and with easy access to the city’s trail system provides great multi-modal options to get around town. Additionally multi-family development in this vicinity is permitted a one parking space to unit ratio, regardless of the number of bedrooms. Both the multi-modal opportunities and parking ratio of multi-family development provide a reasonable basis to grant the parking request of one off-street parking space per dwelling unit for this site-specific development. (5) The Project Review approval, at City Council's discretion, may include specific allowances for dimensional flexibility between Project Review and Detailed Review. Changes shall be subject to the amendment procedures of Section 26.445.110—Amendments. Applicant response: The review criterion is not applicable to the project. Sec. 26.445.070. - Detailed Review Standards. Detailed Review shall focus on the comprehensive evaluation of the specific aspects of the development, including utility placement, and architectural materials. In the review of a development 42 EXHIBIT 1: Review Criteria application for Detailed Review, the Planning and Zoning Commission, or the Historic Preservation Commission as applicable, shall consider the following: (a) Compliance with Project Review Approval. The proposed development, including all dimensions and uses, is consistent with the Project Review approval and adequately addresses conditions on the approval and direction received during the Project Review. Applicant response: As a property located in the Public zone district, any development is memorialized by a Planned Development set through the review process. In 1989, a consolidated Planned Development (PD) and associated land use reviews were approved for the 3,000 sq. ft. lot. The approval granted a rezoning of the property from Office (now Mixed Use) to the Public zone district ensuring that the Mountain Rescue operation became a permitted use and granted the request to expand it through an addition to the building. The PD, per historic staff memos, approved the following dimensions for the expansion: Table 1: PD Dimensional Requirements Minimum Lot Size 3,000 sq. ft. Minimum Lot Width 30 ft. Minimum Front Yard Setback 19 ft. Side Yard Setback 5 ft. Rear Yard Setback 9 ft. Maximum Height 20 ft. Floor Area Ratio .75:1 or 2,250 sq. ft. Parking was proposed to be four spaces, “intended to accommodate the operation’s three vehicles, two snow mobiles and trailer.” Mountain Rescue’s application noted one space was along Main Street, so two vehicles were accommodated in the garage. This is confirmed by meeting minutes of the Planning and Zoning Commission (May 16, 1989). Applicant proposes memorializing the as-built condition on the site which varies slightly from the 1989 approval and to set a site-specific off-street parking ratio for the new duplex development. (b) Growth Management. The proposed development has received all required GMQS allotments, or is concurrently seeking allotments. Applicant response: There is no yearly limitation in affordable housing allotments. (c) Site Planning and Landscape Architecture. The site plan is compatible with the context and visual character of the area. In meeting this standard, the following criteria shall be used: (1) The landscape plan exhibits a well-designed treatment of exterior spaces, preserves existing significant vegetation, and provides an ample quantity and variety of ornamental plant species suitable for the Aspen area climate. Vegetation removal, protection, and restoration plans shall be acceptable to the Director of Parks and Open Space. Applicant response: Minimal changes are proposed to the landscape, most being hardscape changes, as an accessible route will need to be installed along the western boundary of the 43 EXHIBIT 1: Review Criteria property. The existing front yard is anticipated to be maintained in its current condition as a grass lawn. (2) Buildings and site grading provide simple, at-grade entrances and minimize extensive grade changes along building exteriors. The project meets or exceeds the requirements of the Americans with Disabilities Act and applicable requirements for emergency, maintenance, and service vehicle access. Adequate snow storage is accommodated. Applicant response: The entrances to each unit are at grade and an accessible route is being proposed along the western property boundary, there are no extensive grade changes proposed. Some on-site snow storage is available along the front, rear and side of the building, and snow is currently removed from the site when necessary. (3) Energy efficiency or production features are integrated into the landscape in a manner that enhances the site. Applicant response: No energy production is proposed on the site. (4) All site lighting is proposed so as to prevent direct glare or hazardous interference of any kind to adjoining streets or lands. All exterior lighting shall comply with the City's outdoor lighting standards. Applicant response: Minimal exterior building lighting is proposed and will comply with the city’s outdoor lighting standards. (5) Site drainage is accommodated for the proposed development in compliance with Title 29— Engineering Design Standards and shall not negatively impact surrounding properties. Applicant response: With the proposed remodel, site drainage will be improved from its current condition and gain Engineering dept. approval. (d) Design Standards and Architecture. The proposed architectural details emphasize quality construction and design characteristics. In meeting this standard, the following criteria shall be used: (1) The project architecture provides for visual interest and incorporates present-day details and use of materials respectful of the community's past without attempting to mimic history. Applicant response: The building is AspenModern designated with a Pan Abode facing Main Street and a newer addition on the rear. The kit house was constructed in the late 60s and the rear addition was built in the late 80s. No material changes are proposed to the Pan Abode and only fenestration changes are proposed on the addition. (2) Exterior materials are of a high quality, durability, and comply with applicable design standards, including those outlined in Chapter 26.410, Residential Design Standards, Chapter 26.412, Commercial Design Standards, and Chapter 26.415, Historic Preservation. 44 EXHIBIT 1: Review Criteria Applicant response: As noted above, no changes are proposed to the main exterior materials of the building. Windows are proposed to be metal clad, where modified on the addition. (3) Building entrances are sited or designed to minimize icing and snow shedding effects. Applicant response: The Pan Abode has a covered front entry porch which will provide access into one of the dwelling units and the existing side entry to the rear addition has a small covered entry, which will be the primary entrance to the second dwelling unit, meeting the standard. (4) Energy efficiency or production features are integrated into structures in a manner that enhances the architecture. Applicant response: No energy production is proposed on the building. (5) All structure lighting is proposed so as to prevent direct glare or hazardous interference of any kind to adjoining streets or lands. All exterior lighting shall comply with the City's outdoor lighting standards. Applicant response: Minimal exterior building lighting is proposed and will comply with the city’s outdoor lighting standards. (e) Common Parks, Open Space, Recreation Areas, or Facilities. If the proposed development includes common parks, open space, recreation areas, or common facilities, a proportionate, undivided interest is deeded in perpetuity to each lot or dwelling unit owner within the Planned Development. An adequate assurance through a Development Agreement for the permanent care and maintenance of open spaces, recreation areas, and shared facilities together with a prohibition against future development is required. Applicant response: No common parks, open space or recreation areas are provided. This criterion is not applicable. (f) Pedestrian, bicycle & transit facilities. The development improves pedestrian, bicycle, and transit facilities. These facilities and improvements shall be prioritized over vehicular facilities and improvements. Any new vehicular access points minimize impacts on existing pedestrian, bicycle and transit facilities. Any specific designs, mitigation techniques, and implementation timelines as required during Project Review comply with the applicable requirements of the Project Review and as otherwise required in the Land Use Code. These plans shall provide sufficient detail to determine if the design or mitigation concept complies with the intent of the requirements and to determine any required cost estimating for surety requirements, but do not need to be detailed construction documents. Applicant response: No new access to the site is proposed. (g) Engineering Design Standards. There has been accurate identification of engineering design and mitigation techniques necessary for development of the proposed subdivision to comply with the applicable requirements of Municipal Code Title 29—Engineering Design Standards and the City of Aspen Urban Runoff Management Plan (URMP). 45 EXHIBIT 1: Review Criteria Any specific designs, mitigation techniques, and implementation timelines as required during Project Review comply with the applicable requirements of Municipal Code Title 29—Engineering Design Standards and the City of Aspen Urban Runoff Management Plan (URMP). These plans shall provide sufficient detail to determine if the design or mitigation concept complies with the intent of the requirements, but do not need to be detailed construction documents. Applicant response: The project will gain Engineering dept. approvals, such as drainage for the site. (h) Public Infrastructure and Facilities. The proposed Planned Development shall upgrade public infrastructure and facilities necessary to serve the project. Improvements shall be at the sole costs of the developer. Any specific designs, mitigation techniques, and implementation timelines as required during Project Review comply with the applicable requirements of Municipal Code Title 29—Engineering Design Standards and the City of Aspen Urban Runoff Management Plan (URMP). These plans shall provide sufficient detail to determine if the design or mitigation concept complies with the intent of the requirements, but do not need to be detailed construction documents. Applicant response: The project will meet any infrastructure requirements, such as new utility taps for the site, per city requirements. (i) Phasing of development plan. If phasing of the development plan is proposed, each phase shall be designed to function as a complete development and shall not be reliant on subsequent phases. Phasing shall insulate, to the extent practical, occupants of initial phases from the construction of later phases. All necessary or proportionate improvements to public facilities, payment of impact fees and fees-in-lieu, construction of any facilities to be used jointly by residents of the Planned Development, construction of any required affordable housing, and any mitigation measures shall be completed concurrent or prior to the respective impacts associated with the phase. Applicant response: No phasing is proposed, this criterion is not applicable. Chapter 26.470 – Growth Management Quota System Sec. 26.470.100. – Planning and Zoning Commission Applications (a) Change in use. A change in use of an existing property, structure or portions of an existing structure between the development categories identified in Section 26.470.020 (irrespective of direction), for which a certificate of occupancy has been issued and which is intended to be reused, shall be approved, approved with conditions or denied by the Planning and Zoning Commission based on the general requirements outlined in Section 26.470.080. No more than one (1) free-market residential unit may be created through the change-in-use. Applicant response: The project scope is to change from an Essential Public Facility development category to the Residential - Affordable Housing development category. Additional review criteria are responded to below. Sec. 26.470.080. - General review standards. 46 EXHIBIT 1: Review Criteria All Planning and Zoning Commission and City Council applications for growth management review shall comply with the following standards. (a) Sufficient allotments. Sufficient growth management allotments are available to accommodate the proposed development, pursuant to Section 26.470.040(b). Applications for multi-year development allotment, pursuant to Section 26.470.110(a) shall be required to meet this standard for the growth management years from which the allotments are requested. Applicant response: There is no limit to the annual number of development allotments for affordable housing. (b) Development conformance. The proposed development conforms to the requirements and limitations of this Title, of the zone district or a site-specific development plan, any adopted regulatory master plan, as well as any previous approvals, including the Conceptual Historic Preservation Commission approval, the Conceptual Commercial Design Review approval and the Planned Development - Project Review approval, as applicable. Applicant response: There are no proposed changes to the existing structure which complies with most of its 1989 PD approvals; Applicant is requesting amendment of side yard setbacks to memorialize the existing condition and a site-specific variation for the parking requirement as part of this application. (c) Public infrastructure and facilities. The proposed development shall upgrade public infrastructure and facilities necessary to serve the project. Improvements shall be at the sole costs of the developer. Public infrastructure includes, but is not limited to, water supply, sewage treatment, energy and communication utilities, drainage control, fire and police protection, solid waste disposal, parking and road and transit services. Applicant response: The project will meet any infrastructure requirements, such as new utility taps for the site, per city standards. (d) Affordable housing mitigation. (1) For commercial development, sixty-five (65) percent of the employees generated by the additional commercial net leasable space, according to Section 26.470.050(b), Employee Generation Rates, shall be mitigated through the provision of affordable housing. (3) For lodge development, sixty-five (65) percent of the employees generated by the additional lodge pillows, according to Section 26.470.050(b), Employee Generation Rates, shall be mitigated through the provision of affordable housing. For the redevelopment or expansion of existing lodge uses, see Section 26.470.100(g). (4) For the redevelopment of existing commercial net leasable space that did not previously mitigate (see Section 26.470.100(e)), the mitigation requirements for affordable housing shall be phased at fifteen (15) percent beginning in 2017, and by three (3) percent each year thereafter until sixty-five (65) percent is reached, as follows: (TABLE DELETED) (5) Unless otherwise exempted in this Chapter, when a change in use between development categories is proposed, the employee mitigation shall be based on the use the development is converting to. For instance, if a commercial space is being converted to lodge units, the 47 EXHIBIT 1: Review Criteria mitigation shall be based on the requirements for lodge space, outlined in subsection (2), above. Conversely, if lodge units are being converted to commercial space, the mitigation shall be based on the requirements for commercial space, outlined in subsections (1) and (3), above. Applicant response: As voluntary affordable housing, the project does not need to mitigate for employee generation. These criteria are not applicable. (6) For new residential subdivisions, see Section 26.470.100(h) and (i). Applicant response: As this project is not a new subdivision, the criteria are not applicable. (7) For new, redeveloped, or renovated single-family and duplex residential development, or the affordable housing mitigation requirements are established by Section 26.470.090(a) and (c). Applicant response: The criterion is applicable to free-market development and is not applicable to affordable housing development. (7)For the expansion of existing free-market multi-family units, affordable housing mitigation requirements are established by Section 26.470.090(b). Applicant response: The criterion is applicable to free-market development and is not applicable to affordable housing development. (8) For new free-market multi-family units, affordable housing mitigation requirements are established by Section 26.470.090(f). Applicant response: The criterion is applicable to free-market development and is not applicable to affordable housing development. (9) For the demolition or redevelopment of existing multi-family residential development, affordable housing mitigation requirements are established by Section 26.470.100(d). Applicant response: The criterion is applicable to free-market development and is not applicable to affordable housing development. (10)For essential public facility development, mitigation shall be determined based on Section 26.470.110(d). Applicant response: The criterion is applicable to an Essential Public Facility development and is not applicable to affordable housing development. (11)For all affordable housing units that are being provided as mitigation pursuant to this Chapter or for the creation of a Certificate of Affordable Housing Credit pursuant to Chapter 26.540, or for any other reason: i. The proposed units comply with the Aspen/Pitkin County Housing Authority Employee Housing Regulations and Affordable Housing Development Policy, as amended. 48 EXHIBIT 1: Review Criteria ii. Required affordable housing may be provided through a mix of methods outlined in this Chapter, including newly built units, buy down units, certificates of affordable housing credit, or cash-in-lieu. iii. Affordable housing that is in the form of newly built units or buy-down units shall be located on the same parcel as the proposed development or located off-site within the City limits. Units outside the City limits may be accepted as mitigation by the City Council, pursuant to Section 26.470.110(b). When off-site units within City limits are proposed, all requisite approvals shall be obtained prior to approval of the growth management application. iv. Affordable housing mitigation in the form of a Certificate of Affordable Housing Credit, pursuant to Chapter 26.540, shall be extinguished pursuant to Section 26.540.120, Extinguishment and Re-Issuance of a Certificate, utilizing the calculations in Section 26.470.050(f), Employee/Square Footage Conversion. v. If the total mitigation requirement for a project is less than 0.1 FTEs, a cash-in-lieu payment may be made by right. If the total mitigation requirement for a project is 0.1 or more FTEs, a cash-in-lieu payment shall require City Council approval, pursuant to Section 26.470.110(c). vi. Affordable housing units shall be approved pursuant to Section 26.470.100(d), Affordable Housing. vii. Each unit provided shall be designed such that the finished floor level of fifty (50) percent or more of the unit's net livable area is at or above natural or finished grade, whichever is higher. This dimensional requirement may be varied through Special Review, Pursuant to Chapter 26.430. Applicant response: As voluntary affordable housing, some of the criteria are not applicable to this project (11 ii ,iii, iv, and v). The net livable of the Pan Abode dwelling unit is proposed at 518. sq. ft., while the second story unit is proposed at 939 sq. ft.. The Pan Abode meets APCHA’s minimum square footage requirement for a studio (500 sq. ft.) rather than a 1- bedroom, housing 1.25 Full Time Equivalents (FTEs), while the two bedroom unit meets the size requirement, housing 2.25 FTEs. Each unit is 100% above grade. (12)Affordable housing units that are being provided absent a requirement ("voluntary units") may be deed-restricted at any level of affordability, including residential occupied (RO). Applicant response: As voluntary units within the city’s inventory, the income category deed restriction is currently fluid and will be dependent on what APCHA income category the proposed occupant meets prior to occupancy of the unit. (13)Residential mitigation deferral agreement. For property owners qualified as a full-time local working resident, an affordable housing mitigation Deferral Agreement may be accepted by the City of Aspen subject to the Aspen/Pitkin County Housing Authority Employee Housing Regulations. This allows deferral of the mitigation requirement for residential development until such time as the property is no longer owned by a 49 EXHIBIT 1: Review Criteria full-time local working resident. Staff of the City of Aspen Community Development Department and Staff of the Aspen/Pitkin County Housing Authority can assist with the procedures and limitations of this option. The City Attorney and Community Development Director shall prescribe the form to be used for a Deferral Agreement. A copy of the Deferral Agreement form is on file with the City of Aspen Community Development Department. The required mitigation shall be calculated to the FTE and then multiplied by the codified Fee-in- Lieu at the time of building permit submission. This amount will be identified in the Deferral Agreement. Following the establishment of the initial mitigation requirement in the Deferral Agreement, the amount of mitigation initially identified shall increase annually by the CPI for each year that the Deferral Agreement is in effect until such time that the Deferral Agreement is terminated following sale to a non-resident. The term "CPI" shall mean the Consumer Price Index for All Urban Consumers (CPI-U) for the U.S. City Average for All Items, not seasonally adjusted, 1984=100 reference base; published by the United States Department of Labor, Bureau of Labor Statistics. The calculation of the value of the mitigation required at the time of the termination of the Deferral Agreement may be completed using a commonly available calculator that aggregates the CPI over time. The term of the calculation shall be the month of the initial execution of the Deferral Agreement and the most recent index month available at the time of release of the Deferral Agreement. The provision describing this regular annual increase shall be described in the Deferral Agreement. The Deferral Agreement shall be recorded prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy or Letter of Completion. Should a property with a Deferral Agreement in place be sold to a qualified resident, a new Deferral Agreement shall be established, identifying the initial mitigation requirement, and an inclusion of the continued annual increases that will continue to accrue from the date of initiation of the original deferral agreement. The initiation date of the original deferral agreement shall be identified in the new deferral agreement. Deferral Agreements initiated prior to July 28, 2022, shall remain in effect and are not subject to the stipulations described in the paragraphs above. If desired, the parties to a previously established deferral agreement may, at their discretion, enter into a new deferral agreement that that updates the terms to be consistent with the provisions identified above. Applicant response: This criterion is not applicable to the project. Sec. 26.470.100.C – Affordable Housing (c) Affordable Housing. The development of affordable housing that does not qualify for administrative review and approval under the criteria established in Section 26.470.090(c), shall be approved, approved with conditions, or denied by the Planning and Zoning Commission based on the general requirements outlined in Section 26.470.080, and all other applicable review criteria of this Title. If the affordable housing project is located in a historic district or on a historically designated property, the Historic Preservation Commission is the review body for this review. Additionally, the following shall apply to all affordable housing development: (1) The proposed units shall be deed-restricted as "for sale" units and transferred to qualified purchasers according to the Aspen Pitkin County Housing Authority Regulations. The developer of the project may be entitled to select the first purchasers, subject to the aforementioned 50 EXHIBIT 1: Review Criteria qualifications, pursuant to the Aspen Pitkin County Housing Authority Regulations. The deed restriction shall authorize the Aspen Pitkin County Housing Authority or the City to own the unit and rent it to qualified renters as defined in the Aspen Pitkin County Housing Authority Regulations, as amended. Applicant response: This criterion is not applicable to the project. As part of the city owned inventory, the units are managed by the city and a city deed restriction encumbers the property/dwelling units. Presently, a city employee must meet the APCHA income, employment, and exclusion zone requirements to qualify for a unit. (2) The proposed units may be rental units, including but not limited to rental units owned by an employer, government or quasi-government institution, or non-profit organization if a legal instrument in a form acceptable to the City Attorney ensures permanent affordability of the units. The City encourages affordable housing associated for lodge development to be rental units associated with the lodge operation and contributing to the long-term viability of the lodge. Applicant response: As voluntary units within the city’s inventory, the income category deed restriction is currently fluid and dependent on what APCHA income category the proposed occupant meets prior to occupancy of the unit. Units can be either for sale or rental dependent on the city’s needs at the time of occupancy. (3) A combination of "for sale" and rental units is permitted. Applicant response: See the response above. Chapter 26. 415: Historic Preservation Sec. 26.415.070.C – Certificate of Appropriateness for Minor Development (c) Certificate of appropriateness for a minor development. (1) The review and decision on the issuance of a certificate of appropriateness for minor development shall begin with a determination by the Community Development Director that the proposed project constitutes a minor development. Minor development work includes: a. Expansion or erection of a structure wherein the increase of the floor area of the structure is two hundred and fifty (250) square feet or less or b. Alterations to a building façade, windows, doors, roof planes or material, exterior wall materials, dormer porch, exterior staircase, balcony or ornamental trim when three (3) or fewer elements are affected and the work does not qualify for a certificate of no negative effect or c. Erection or installation of a combination or multiples of awning, canopies, mechanical equipment, fencing, signs, accessory features and other attachments to designated properties such that the cumulative impact does not allow for the issuance of a certificate of no negative effect; d. Alterations that are made to nonhistoric portions of a designated historic property that do not qualify for a certificate of no negative effect; or 51 EXHIBIT 1: Review Criteria e. The erection of street furniture, signs, public art and other visible improvements within designated historic districts of a magnitude or in numbers such that the cumulative impact does not allow for the issuance of a certificate of no negative effect. The Community Development Director may determine that an application for work on a designated historic property involving multiple categories of minor development may result in the cumulative impact such that it is considered a major development. In such cases, the applicant shall apply for a major development review in accordance with Subsection 26.415.07(d). Applicant response: The scope of work on the exterior of the building and within the yard include: adding gutters to the building (including the Pan Abode), installing new, additional fenestration to the rear addition and modifying the configuration of certain existing windows. An accessible walkway will be added along the western side of the building. (2) An application for minor development shall include the following: a. The general application information required in Section 26.304.030. Applicant response: Typical application requirements are included in this application. b. Scaled elevations and/or drawings of the proposed work and its relationship to the designated historic buildings, structures, sites and features within its vicinity. Applicant response: Scaled drawings are provided in the application. c. An accurate representation of all building materials and finishes to be used in the development. Applicant response: Materials are represented in the application. d. Photographs and other exhibits, as needed, to accurately depict location, extent and design of proposed work. Applicant response: Photos and drawings are included in the application. e. Verification that the proposal complies with Chapter 26.410, Residential design standards or a written request for a variance from any standard that is not being met. Applicant response: Applicable review criteria are responded to below. Chapter 26.410: Residential Design Standards Sec 26.410.010(d) - Remodels (d) Remodels. Where work is proposed on any element of an existing building that is addressed by the Residential Design Standards and that is not in compliance with the Standards, the property owner shall make a reasonable effort to bring that element into compliance. The Community Development Director may grant exceptions for remodels that would require significant additional work above 52 EXHIBIT 1: Review Criteria and beyond the scope of the remodel in order to ensure that all features are brought into compliance. Applicant response: There are limited changes proposed to the existing building. Only the addition of and modification to windows on the rear additional are applicable to the Residential Design Standards. 26.410.030 (e) Fenestration and Materials (3) Non-orthogonal Window Limit (Flexible). a. Applicability. This standard shall apply to all lots except: 1.Lots outside of the Aspen Infill Area. 2.Lots with a required front yard setback of at least ten (10) vertical feet above or below street grade. b. Intent. This standard seeks to encourage rectilinear window shapes seen in Aspen's historic residential architecture and discourages the proliferation or overuse of round or diagonal- oriented windows. Designs should minimize the use of non-orthogonal windows that face the street in order to help preserve the historic character of Aspen. This standard is critical in the Infill Area where many of Aspen's historic residential buildings are located. c. Standard. A building shall have no more than one (1) non-orthogonal window on each façade of the building that faces the street. A single non-orthogonal window in a gable end may be divided with mullions and still be considered one (1) non-orthogonal window. See Figure 26. Applicant response: Two sets of new windows are proposed on the upper story of the rear addition on the eastern facade, one window on the ground floor of the rear addition is removed and a set of new windows is added on the second story of the addition’s west façade. The existing full-length windows on the alley are replaced with windows that are shorter and wider. No non-orthogonal windows are proposed. Historic Preservation Design Guidelines Log Kit/Pan Abode Buildings Applicant response: The existing site plan will be minimally altered as the existing Pan Abode and addition will primarily receive an interior remodel. The existing site provides a grass front yard with simple a concrete walkway to the entry of the Pan Abode from the Main Street sidewalk. A +4 ft. side yard is located on the east and west side of the structure with a rear yard that is mostly covered by a double width driveway that connects the garage bay to the alley. Besides drainage for the site that needs to be adequately addressed, a simple walkway needs to be installed from the front of the building along the western side yard to the garage. This walkway is required to provide an accessible route on the property. The existing building materials are being preserved, with only fenestration changes being proposed on the addition. The original size of the front door and porch are being maintained on the Pan Abode with no changes to the roof form or eave depth. Gutters will be added. 53 EXHIBIT 1: Review Criteria Based on the scope of the remodel, the following guidelines are met: Chapter 1: Site Planning & Landscape Design. 1.1 All projects shall respect the historic development pattern or context of the block, neighborhood or district. 1.2 Preserve the system and character of historic streets, alleys, and ditches. 1.5 Maintain the historic hierarchy of spaces. 1.6 Provide a simple walkway running perpendicular from the street to the front entry on residential projects. 1.12 Provide an appropriate context for historic structures. 1.17 No fence in the front yard is often the most appropriate solution. Chapter 2: Building Materials. 2.1 Preserve original building materials. Chapter 3: Windows. 3.1 Preserve the functional and decorative features of a historic window. 3.2 Preserve the position, number, and arrangement of historic windows in a building wall. Chapter 4: Doors. 4.2 Maintain the original size of a door and its opening. Chapter 5: Porches and Balconies. 5.1 Preserve an original porch or balcony. Chapter 6: Architectural details. 6.1 Preserve significant architectural features. Chapter 7: Roofs. 7.1 Preserve the original form of a roof. 7.2 Preserve the original eave depth. 7.10 Design gutters so that their visibility on the structure is minimized to the extent possible. 54 GSPublisherVersion 580.0.6.7 DRAWING NAME COVER SHEET SHEET: A-0.0630 WEST MAIN630 WEST MAINASPEN, COJURISDICTION USE REVISION HISTORY DATE 06.28.2023DRAWINGS - LAND USE THE OUTPOST STUDIO LLC architecture | interiors | environment CARBONDALE, CO NOT FOR CONSTRUCTIONPROJECT DIRECTORY OWNER CITY OF ASPEN ASSET MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT CONTACT: JENNIFER PHELAN l jennifer.phelan@aspen.gov ARCHITECT THE OUTPOST STUDIO 453 LIONS RIDGE ROAD CARBONDALE, CO 81623 203-610-7633 CONTACT: DANA ELLIS, AIA | dana@outpoststudioco.com CIVIL ENGINEER SGM 118 W SIXTH STREET, SUITE 200 GLENWOOD SPRINGS, CO 81601 970-945-1004 STRUCTURAL CARYATID STRUCTURAL ENGINEERING CONTACT: ELIZABETH LOZNER I elizabeth@caryatidstructural.com VICNITY MAP - NOT TO SCALE EXISTING SITE PHOTO STRUCTURAL DRAWINGS CIVIL DRAWINGS PROJECT INFORMATION ADDRESS 630 W MAIN STREET, ASPEN, CO 81611 PARCEL ID 273512444855 LAND USE ZONE DISTRICT PUBLIC (PUB) BUILDING USE OFFICE TO AFFORDABLE HOUSING EXISTING FLOOR AREA 0 SF LOT SIZE 3,000 SQ FT MAX. BUILDING HEIGHT 20'-0" PER PD APPLICABLE CODES 2015 International Building Code - 2015 International Residential Code, Chapters 1-10 Adopted Appendices: E, F, H, J, K, R, S, U 2015 International Energy Conservation Code 2015 International Plumbing Code 2015 Mechanical Code 2015 International Fire Code 2015 International Existing Building Code ICC A117.1-2009 Accessible and Usable Buildings and Facilities 2020 National Electrical Code ELECTRICAL LOAD: 200 AMP SERVICE RATING - EXISTING TO REMAIN CLIMATE ZONE: 7 630 W MAIN - RENDERINGS SCOPE OF WORK REMODEL OF AN EXISTING BUILDING FROM CITY OF ASPEN OFFICE SPACE TO AFFORDABLE HOUSING (2 UNITS). 630 WEST MAIN IS LOCATED WITHIN THE MAIN STREET HISTORIC DISTRICT AND IS A DESIGNATED LANDMARK. NO EXTERIOR ALTERATIONS ARE PLANNED FOR THE PAN ABODE PORTION OF THE BUILDING. SHEET INDEX A-0.0 COVER SHEET A-0.2 FLOOR AREA SUMMARY A-0.3 NET LEASABLE/LIVABLE A-1.1 SITE PLAN A-2.1e EXISTING FLOO PLAN A-4.0e EXISTING ELEVATIONS D-2.1 DEMO FLOOR PLAN A-2.1 PROPOSED FLOOR PLAN A-3.0 REFLECTED CEILING PLAN A-3.1 SWITCHING A-4.0 PRPOSED ELEVATIONS + MATERIALS A-5.0 BUILDING SECTIONS A-7.1 ASSEMBLIES A-7.2 DETAILS + ASSEMBLIES A-8.1 WINDOW & DOOR SCHEDULES 55 GSPublisherVersion 580.0.6.7 DRAWING NAME FLOOR AREA SUMMARY SHEET: A-0.2630 WEST MAIN630 WEST MAINASPEN, COJURISDICTION USE REVISION HISTORY DATE 06.28.2023DRAWINGS - LAND USE THE OUTPOST STUDIO LLC architecture | interiors | environment CARBONDALE, CO NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION113 H 110109 111 101A 112 J I 106 105 105A 103 104 102 104A D FE G 1 A-4.0 3 A-4.0 2 A-4.0 4 A-4.0 101101 A B 1 1 2 2 3 3 C D 107 108 1,416 sq ft 207 206 205 M 208 209 202201 204203 K L C C D D 2a 3 792 sq ft 517 sq ft 108A 105 106 104 102 G 107A 103A 104B 105B 108C 108B 1 A-4.0 3 A-4.0 2 A-4.0 4 A-4.0 A B 1 1 2 2 3 3 C D 899 sq ft 203 202 201 204 208 205207206 213 212 211 210 209 217216214215 205A 204B 201A 205B 204A 202A C C D D 2a DN 3 792 sq ft 1 A-0.2 EXISTING MAIN LEVEL FLOOR AREA1/4" = 1'-0" 2 A-0.2 EXISTING UPPER LEVEL FLOOR AREA1/4" = 1'-0" 3 A-0.2 PROPOSED MAIN LEVEL FLOOR AREA1/4" = 1'-0" 2 A-0.2 PROPOSED UPPER LEVEL FLOOR AREA1/4" = 1'-0" COMMERCIAL FLOOR AREA COVERED PORCH < 8'-0" FROM EXTERIOR FINISH LEGEND FLOOR AREA SUMMARY - EXISTING MAIN LEVEL 1,416 SF UPPER LEVEL + 792 SF TOTAL 2,208 SF FLOOR AREA SUMMARY - PROPOSED MAIN LEVEL 1,416 SF GARAGE (EXEMPT) (- 517 SF) UPPER LEVEL + 792 SF TOTAL 1,691 SF RESIDENTIAL FLOOR AREA COVERED PORCH < 8'-0" FROM EXTERIOR FINISH LEGEND GARAGE AREA - 2 UNITS (375 SF EXEMPT PER 26.575.020.(D)(8) 56 GSPublisherVersion 580.0.6.7 DRAWING NAME NET LEASABLE/LIVABLE SHEET: A-0.3630 WEST MAIN630 WEST MAINASPEN, COJURISDICTION USE REVISION HISTORY DATE 06.28.2023DRAWINGS - LAND USE THE OUTPOST STUDIO LLC architecture | interiors | environment CARBONDALE, CO NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION525 sq ft 151 sq ft 531 sq ft 37 sq ft 100 sq ft 113 H 110109 111 101A 112 J I 106 105 105A 103 104 102 104A D FE G 1 A-4.0 3 A-4.0 2 A-4.0 4 A-4.0 (E) ELECTRICAL PANEL STACKABLEW/D UP W.C. MECH. ROOM UP 4R @6 5/8"3T @ 9 3/4"4R @7 1/2"3T @ 1'-1 5/8"3R @7 3/4" 3T @ 1'-3/4" OFFICE OFFICE KITCHEN OFFICEPAN ABODEPAN ABODE1/4":12"PARKING SPACE UNIT A PARKING SPACE UNIT B 101101 A B 1 1 2 2 3 3 C D 107 108 4R @7 1/2" 3T @ 1'-1 3/4" 727 sq ft 207 206 205 M 208 209 202201 204203 K L C C D D 2a DN4R @6 5/8"3T @ 9 3/4"4R @7 1/2" 3T @ 1'-1 3/4"4R @7 1/2"3T @ 1'-1 5/8"3R @7 3/4" 3T @ 1'-3/4" OFFICE OFFICE 3 D/W QUEEN60 X 8030" DIA 87 sq ft 211 sq ft 487 sq ft 108A 105 106 104 102 G 107A 103A 104B 105B 108C 108B 1 A-4.0 3 A-4.0 2 A-4.0 4 A-4.0 1 HOUR FIRE-RESISTANCERATING, PER IRC TABLER302.1 1 HOUR FIRE-RESISTANCE RATING,PER IRC TABLE R302.1 (E) ELECTRICAL PANEL NEW 1HR FIRERESISTANT WALLPER IRC R302.6 EXISTING WALLTO BE REBUILTAND MEET 1HRFIRERESISTANCEPER IRC R302.6 STACKABLEW/D NEW FIRE STROBE HEAT PUMP OUTDOOR UNITS NEW 6' WOOD SLATSCREENING FENCE W/ GATE UP UP 4R @6 5/8"3T @ 9 3/4"4R @7 1/2"3T @ 1'-1 5/8"3R @7 3/4" 3T @ 1'-3/4" TRASH/RECYCLING CLO.STACKABLEW/DPAN ABODEPAN ABODE1/4":12"PARKING SPACE UNIT A PARKING SPACE UNIT B REF. D/W RANGE A B 1 1 2 2 3 3 C D 518 sq ft 4R @7 1/2" 3T @ 1'-1 3/4"QUEEN60 X 80203 202 201 204 208 205207206 213 212 211 210 209 217216214215 205A 204B 201A 205B 204A 202A C D 2a OPEN SHELVING OPEN SHELVING DN4R @6 5/8"3T @ 9 3/4"4R @7 1/2" 3T @ 1'-1 3/4"4R @7 1/2"3T @ 1'-1 5/8"3R @7 3/4" 3T @ 1'-3/4"DN PANTRY CLO. CLO. RANGE REF. D/W E E E E E 3FULL54 X 75727 sq ft A A-0.3 EXISTING - MAIN LEVEL NET LEASABLE1/4" = 1'-0" B A-0.3 EXISTING - UPPER LEVEL NET LEASABLE1/4" = 1'-0" C A-0.3 PROPOSED - MAIN LEVEL NET LIVABLE1/4" = 1'-0" D A-0.3 PROPOSED - UPPER LEVEL NET LIVABLE1/4" = 1'-0" GARAGE / MECHANICAL AREA NET LEASABLE AREA LEGEND GARAGE / MECHANICAL AREA NET LIVABLE AREA - UNIT A LEGEND (i) Measurement of Net Leasable and Net Livable Area. The calculation of net leasable are and net livable area shall include all interior spaces of a building measured from interior wall to interior wall, including interior partitions. Net leasable area and net livable area shall be attributed to the lot of parcel upon which it is developed. Net leasable area includes all interior areas which can be leased to an individual tenant with the exceptions noted below. Net livable area includes those areas of a building that are used or intended to be used for habitation with the exceptions noted below. Garages and carports are exempt from net leasable and net livable area calculations. — The calculation of net leasable area and net livable area shall exclude areas of a building that are integral to the basic physical function of the building. All other areas are attributed to the measurement of net leasable commercial space or net livable area. When calculating interior stairways or elevators, the top most interior level served by the stairway or elevator is exempt from net livable or net leasable area calculations. NET LIVABLE AREA - UNIT B NET LEASABLE/LIVABLE SUMMARY EXISTING: NET LEASABLE AREA - MAIN LEVEL 782 SQ FT NET LEASABLE AREA - UPPER LEVEL + 727 SQ FT TOTAL NET LEASABLE AREA: 1,409 SQ FT GARAGE / MECHANICAL AREA: 562 SQ FT PROPOSED: NET LIVABLE AREA - UNIT A - MAIN LEVEL 518 SQ FT NET LIVABLE AREA - UNIT B - MAIN LEVEL 211 SQ FT NET LIVABLE AREA - UNIT A - UPPER LEVEL + 727 SQ FT TOTAL NET LIVABLE UNIT B: 938 SQ FT TOTAL NET LIVABLE AREA (BOTH UNITS): 1,456 SQ FT GARAGE / MECHANICAL AREA: 574 SQ FT 57 GSPublisherVersion 580.0.6.7 DRAWING NAME SITE PLAN SHEET: A-1.1630 WEST MAIN630 WEST MAINASPEN, COJURISDICTION USE REVISION HISTORY DATE 06.28.2023DRAWINGS - LAND USE THE OUTPOST STUDIO LLC architecture | interiors | environment CARBONDALE, CO NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION6'-0"10'-0" 4'-0"12'-0"LOT M3,000 SF GC TO ACCESS CONDITION AND REPAIR/ REPLACE IF NECESSARY (E) SIREN TO REMAINNEW HEAT PUMPS - MOUNTED TO BUILDING ON RACKS NEW 6' WOOD SLAT SCREENING FENCE W/ GATE792779277926 7925 7925PROPERTY LINEMAIN STREETEDGE OF ASPHALTEDGE OF CURBCONCRETE SIDEWALKCONCRETE SIDEWALK NEIGHBORING PROPERTY CONCRETE SIDEWALK FRONT YARD, RAIN GARDEN BIOSWALE SEED MIX PROPERTY LINE COVERED ENTRY CONCRETE APRON NEW CONCRETE SIDEWALK ALLEYNEW CONCRETE SIDEWALK 1 - SITE PLAN 1/4" = 1'-0"N58 GSPublisherVersion 580.0.6.7 DRAWING NAME EXISTING FLOOR PLANS SHEET: A-2.1e630 WEST MAIN630 WEST MAINASPEN, COJURISDICTION USE REVISION HISTORY DATE 06.28.2023DRAWINGS - LAND USE THE OUTPOST STUDIO LLC architecture | interiors | environment CARBONDALE, CO NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION113 H 110109 111 101A 112 J I 106 105 105A 103 104 102 104A D FE G 42'-8 1/2"29'-5 1/2"72'-2"42'-8 1/2"29'-5 1/2"72'-2"19'-10" 20'-2" 1 A-5.0 1 A-5.0 2 A-5.0 2 A-5.0 3 A-5.0 3 A-5.0 1 A-4.0 3 A-4.0 2 A-4.0 4 A-4.0 (E) ELECTRICAL PANEL STACKABLEW/D UP W.C. MECH. ROOM UP 4R @6 5/8"3T @ 9 3/4"4R @7 1/2"3T @ 1'-1 5/8"3R @7 3/4" 3T @ 1'-3/4" OFFICE OFFICE KITCHEN OFFICEPAN ABODEPAN ABODE1/4":12"PARKING SPACE UNIT A PARKING SPACE UNIT B 101101 A B 1 1 2 2 3 3 C D 107 108 4R @7 1/2" 3T @ 1'-1 3/4"PAN ABODE2'-0"8" 8"8"1'-3"1'-3" EXISTING ROOF TO REMAIN EXISTING ROOF TO REMAIN EXISTING ROOF TO BE REPAIRED & REPAINTED NEW GUTTER, TYP. 4":12"4":12"PAN ABODEA B 1 1 2 2 3 3 C D EXISTING ROOF TO REMAIN 5 1/2":12" 4":12"4":12"4":12"4":12"5 1/2":12"5 1/2":12"5 1/2":12"4":12"207 206 205 M 208 209 202201 204203 K L C C D D 2a 2a DN4R @6 5/8"3T @ 9 3/4"4R @7 1/2" 3T @ 1'-1 3/4"4R @7 1/2"3T @ 1'-1 5/8"3R @7 3/4" 3T @ 1'-3/4" OFFICE OFFICE 3 3 1 A-2.1e MAIN LEVEL 1/4" = 1'-0" 3 A-2.1e ROOF PLAN 1/4" = 1'-0" 2 A-2.1e UPPER LEVEL 1/4" = 1'-0" 59 GSPublisherVersion 580.0.6.7 DRAWING NAME EXISTING ELEVATIONS + MATERIALS SHEET: A-4.0e630 WEST MAIN630 WEST MAINASPEN, COJURISDICTION USE REVISION HISTORY DATE 06.28.2023DRAWINGS - LAND USE THE OUTPOST STUDIO LLC architecture | interiors | environment CARBONDALE, CO NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION1 +119'-5 1/2" 3 ROOF LEVEL 213 106 105 212 (E) SIDING TO BE REMOVED PAN ADOBE ORIGINAL LOOK TO REMAIN4":12"4":12"5 1/2":12"100'-0" 1 MIAN LEVEL 2a 2 3 PAN ABODE DD CC +119'-5 1/2" 3 ROOF LEVEL 216217 111 110 109 214215 100'-0" 1 MAIN LEVEL 4 ":1 2 "4":12" 4 ":1 2 " 5 1 /2 ":1 2 "5 1/2":12" B A 10'-8 1/2"EXISTING TO REMAIN+119'-5 1/2" 3 ROOF LEVEL 104 102104A 203 202 201 101 EXISTING OVERHANG TO BE REPAIRED AND REPAINTED (E) SIDING TO BE REMOVED PAN ADOBE ORIGINAL LOOK TO REMAIN 101A 100' 1 MAIN LEVEL 5 1 /2 ":1 2 "5 1/2":12"4":12"4":12"3 2 1 PAN ABODE CC DDA B +119'-5 1/2" 3 ROOF LEVEL 207 206 105A 100'-0" 1 MAIN LEVEL 4":12" 5 1/2":12"5 1 /2 ":1 2 " 4 ":1 2 " 2 A-4.0e WEST ELEVATION 1/4" = 1'-0" 1 A-4.0e NORTH ELEVATION 1/4" = 1'-0" 3 A-4.0e EAST ELEVATION 1/4" = 1'-0" 4 A-4.0e SOUTH ELEVATION 1/4" = 1'-0" 60 GSPublisherVersion 580.0.6.7 DRAWING NAME DEMO FLOOR PLAN SHEET: D-2.1630 WEST MAIN630 WEST MAINASPEN, COJURISDICTION USE REVISION HISTORY DATE 06.28.2023DRAWINGS - LAND USE THE OUTPOST STUDIO LLC architecture | interiors | environment CARBONDALE, CO NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION42'-8 1/2"29'-5 1/2"72'-2"42'-8 1/2"29'-5 1/2"72'-2"19'-10" 20'-2" 1 A-5.0 1 A-5.0 2 A-5.0 2 A-5.0 3 A-5.0 3 A-5.0 1 A-4.0 3 A-4.0 2 A-4.0 4 A-4.0 EXISTING WALL TO REMAIN EXISTING WALL TO REMAIN (E) ELECTRICAL PANEL STACKABLE W/D UP W.C. MECH. ROOM UP 4R @6 5/8"3T @ 9 3/4"4R @7 1/2"3T @ 1'-1 5/8"3R @7 3/4" 3T @ 1'-3/4" OFFICE OFFICE KITCHEN OFFICEPAN ABODEPAN ABODE1/4":12"PARKING SPACE UNIT A PARKING SPACE UNIT B A B 1 1 2 2 3 3 C D 4R @7 1/2" 3T @ 1'-1 3/4" C C D D 2a 2a DN4R @6 5/8"3T @ 9 3/4"4R @7 1/2" 3T @ 1'-1 3/4"4R @7 1/2"3T @ 1'-1 5/8"3R @7 3/4" 3T @ 1'-3/4" OFFICE OFFICE 3 3 1 D-2.1 MAIN LEVEL DEMO PLAN 1/4" = 1'-0" 2 D-2.1 UPPER LEVEL DEMO PLAN 1/4" = 1'-0" GENERAL NOTES: 1. REMOVE ALL INTERIOR FINISHES 2. REMOVE GWB. 3. REMOVE CLAP BOARD SIDING ON HISTORIC PAN ABODE, RESTORE TO LOG SIDING. CONDITION TO BE REVIEWED IN FIELD. 4. REMOVE EXISTING LIGHT FIXTURES. 5. STRUCTURAL ENGINEER TO REVIEW THE STRUCTURE AFTER THE DEMO IS COMPLETE. 6. GC TO VERIFY WITH PROPOSED DRAWINGS THE EXTENT OF DEMOLITION. 7. GC TO ASSESS THE CONDITION OF ALL WINDOWS. REPLACEMENT IF NECESSARY. 8. GC TO ASSESS THE CONDITION OF EXISTING TO REMAIN ELEMENTS AND ADVISE THE CLIENT AND ARCHITECT OF RECOMMENDED REPAIRS OR REPLACEMENTS. 9. REMOVE EXISTING ELECTRICAL, PLUMBING, AND MECHANICAL AS REQUIRED FOR NEW WORK. 10. DEMOLITION SHALL NOT BE LIMITED SOLELY TO ITEMS SHOWN IN THE DRAWINGS. THE INTENT IS TO SHOW THE GENERAL SCOPE OF DEMOLITION REQUIRED TO PREPARE FOR RENOVATION. SEE ALL FLOOR PLANS, ELEVATIONS, DETAILS, AND SCHEDULES FOR THE FULL EXTENT OF WORK. 11. WHERE APPLICABLE, ALL STRUCTURES, EXISTING TO REMAIN OR REMOVED, SHALL BE PROPERLY SHORED AND OR SUPPORTED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE CONTRACTED STRUCTURAL ENGINEER'S WAYS AND MEANS. 12. GENERAL CONTRACTOR TO ASSUME LIABILITY FOR MOVEMENT, SETTLEMENT, DAMAGE, OR INJURY RESULTING FROM DEMOLITION WORK. 13. COMPLY WITH ALL APPLICABLE LOCAL, STATE, AND FEDERAL CODES AS WELL AS REGULATIONS PERTAINING TO THE SAFETY OF ALL PERSONS, PROPERTY, AND ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION. 14. CEASE OPERATIONS IF THE SAFETY OF THE STRUCTURE APPEARS TO BE ENDANGERED. 15. REMOVE FROM THE SITE AND LEGALLY DISPOSE OF REUSE, DEBRIS, RUBBISH, AND OTHER MATERIALS, AS RECYCLING AS POSSIBLE. EXISTING TO REMAIN EXISTING TO BE REMOVED EXISTING TO REMAIN LEGEND 61 GSPublisherVersion 580.0.6.7 DRAWING NAME PROPOSED FLOOR PLANS SHEET: A-2.1630 WEST MAIN630 WEST MAINASPEN, COJURISDICTION USE REVISION HISTORY DATE 06.28.2023DRAWINGS - LAND USE THE OUTPOST STUDIO LLC architecture | interiors | environment CARBONDALE, CO NOT FOR CONSTRUCTIOND/W QUEEN60 X 8030" DIA 108A 105 106 104 102 G 107A 103A 104B 105B 108C 108B 42'-8 1/2"29'-5 1/2"72'-2"42'-8 1/2"29'-5 1/2"72'-2"19'-10" 20'-2"7 1/2"20'-1 1/2"4 1/2"1 A-5.0 1 A-5.0 2 A-5.0 2 A-5.0 3 A-5.0 3 A-5.0 1 A-4.0 3 A-4.0 2 A-4.0 4 A-4.0 1 HOUR FIRE-RESISTANCERATING, PER IRC TABLER302.1 1 HOUR FIRE-RESISTANCE RATING, PER IRC TABLE R302.1 (E) ELECTRICAL PANEL NEW 1HR FIRERESISTANT WALLPER IRC R302.6 EXISTING WALLTO BE REBUILTAND MEET 1HRFIRERESISTANCEPER IRC R302.6 STACKABLEW/D NEW FIRE STROBE HEAT PUMP OUTDOOR UNITS NEW 6' WOOD SLATSCREENING FENCE W/ GATE UP UP 4R @6 5/8"3T @ 9 3/4"4R @7 1/2"3T @ 1'-1 5/8"3R @7 3/4" 3T @ 1'-3/4" TRASH/RECYCLING CLO.STACKABLEW/DPAN ABODEPAN ABODE1/4":12"PARKING SPACE UNIT A PARKING SPACE UNIT B REF. D/W RANGE BDR. 1 108 82 sq ft UNIT A 101 195 sq ft KITCHEN 102 142 sq ft GARAGE 105 454 sq ft MECH. ROOM 107 77 sq ft UNIT B 104 112 sq ft STORAGE 106 23 sq ft BATH 103 46 sq ft A B 1 1 2 2 3 3 C D 4R @7 1/2" 3T @ 1'-1 3/4"QUEEN60 X 80203 202 201 204 208 205207206 213 212 211 210 209 217216214215 205A 204B 201A 205B 204A 202A C C D D 2a 2a 13'-8"13'-8"3'-3"OPEN SHELVING OPEN SHELVING DN4R @6 5/8"3T @ 9 3/4"4R @7 1/2" 3T @ 1'-1 3/4"4R @7 1/2"3T @ 1'-1 5/8"3R @7 3/4" 3T @ 1'-3/4" PANTRY CLO. CLO. RANGE REF. D/W E E E E E BDR. 2 205 89 sq ft KITCHEN 202 95 sq ft LIVING ROOM 203 341 sq ft BATH 201 42 sq ft 3 3FULL54 X 75BDR. 1 204 80 sq ft PAN ABODE2'-0"8" 8"8"1'-3"1'-3" EXISTING ROOF TO REMAIN EXISTING ROOF TO REMAIN EXISTING ROOF TO BE REPAIRED & REPAINTED NEW GUTTER, TYP. 4":12"4":12"PAN ABODEA B 1 1 2 2 3 3 C D EXISTING ROOF TO REMAIN 5 1/2":12" 4":12"4":12"4":12"4":12"5 1/2":12"5 1/2":12"5 1/2":12"4":12"1 A-2.1 PROPOSED MAIN LEVEL FLOOR PLAN 1/4" = 1'-0" 2 A-2.1 PROPOSED UPPER LEVEL FLOOR PLAN 1/4" = 1'-0" 3 A-2.1 PROPOSED ROOF PLAN 1/4" = 1'-0" 62 GSPublisherVersion 580.0.6.7 DRAWING NAME REFLECTED CEILING PLAN SHEET: A-3.0630 WEST MAIN630 WEST MAINASPEN, COJURISDICTION USE REVISION HISTORY DATE 06.28.2023DRAWINGS - LAND USE THE OUTPOST STUDIO LLC architecture | interiors | environment CARBONDALE, CO NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION6" RECESSED CAN CEILING FAN - NO LIGHT PENDANT UC1 UNDER CABINET LIGHTING CF EX1 EXTERIOR WALL SCONCE EF EXHAUST FAN CARBON MONOXIDE, GAS, SMOKE DETECTOR THERMOSTAT, 60" AFF, TYP. S OUTLET, GFI/EXT NOTED - 40" AFF, TYP. SWITCH, 48" AFF, TYP. POWER/USB OUTLET 120W R1 D POWER OUTLET 240W T 4" SHOWER RECESSED CANW1 VANITY BAR ELECTRICAL LEGEND P VB PER SECTION 26.575.150 OUTDOOR LIGHTING. FROM THE CITY OF ASPEN LAND USE CODE, THE FOLLOWING STANDARDS WILL BE MET: (1) OUTDOOR LIGHTING SHALL BE TWELVE (12) FEET OR LESS IN HEIGHT. (2) ALL LIGHT SOURCES SHALL BE FULLY SHIELDED, DARK SKY COMPLIANT. (3) LANDSCAPE LIGHTING IS LIMITED TO THIRTY-FIVE (35) WATTS PER FIXTURE, PER ONE-HUNDRED FIFTY (150) SQUARE FEET OF LANDSCAPED AREA. (4) PHOTO CELL LIGHT TO BE INSTALLED AT SIDE YARD ENTRY AND GARAGE.QUEEN60 X 80T W1W1SS SSEX1 UC1 EX1EX1 EX1 EX1 R1 R1 R1 R1 R1R1 R1 R1 R1 R1 R1 R1 R1 R1 R1 R1 R1 R1 R1 R1 R1 R1 R1 T S S SS SSSSS SSSS R1 P 108A 105 106 104 102 G 107A 103A 104B 105B 108C 108B F8'-4 1/2" FLAT 1 A-4.0 3 A-4.0 2 A-4.0 4 A-4.0 42" @ F.F. 42" @ F.F. (E) ELECTRICAL PANEL CONTROLS THE LIGHT IN HALLWAY AT UPPER LEVEL SWITCH TO OUTLETS INSTALL PHOTOCELL INSTALL PHOTOCELL RECIRCULATING RANGE HOOD UPPER CABINETS, TYP. 4":12"4":12" 4":12"VB EF FAN A B 1 1 2 2 3 3 C D D/W QUEEN60 X 80FULL54 X 75T SSSSUC1 UC1 D1 R1 R1 R1 R1 R1 R1 R1 R1 R1 R1R1 R1 R1 R1 W1 CF CF TSS S S R1 203 202 201 204 208 205207206 213 212 211 210 209 217216214215 205A 204B 201A 205B 204A 202A C C D D 2a 2a 42" @ F.F. G.F.I. G.F.I. G.F.I. VB 4":12"4":12" 4":12" 4":12"4":12"3 3 EF FAN 1 A-3.0 UPPER LEVEL RCP & POWER PLAN 1/4" = 1'-0" 2 A-3.0 UPPER LEVEL RCP & POWER PLAN 1/4" = 1'-0" 63 GSPublisherVersion 580.0.6.7 DRAWING NAME SWITCHING SHEET: A-3.1630 WEST MAIN630 WEST MAINASPEN, COJURISDICTION USE REVISION HISTORY DATE 06.28.2023DRAWINGS - LAND USE THE OUTPOST STUDIO LLC architecture | interiors | environment CARBONDALE, CO NOT FOR CONSTRUCTIONT W1W1SS SSEX1 UC1 EX1EX1 EX1 EX1 R1 R1 R1 R1 R1R1 R1 R1 R1 R1 R1 R1 R1 R1 R1 R1 R1 R1 R1 R1 R1 R1 R1 T S S SS SSSSS SSSS R1 108A 105 106 104 102 G 107A 103A 104B 105B 108C 108B 1 A-4.0 3 A-4.0 2 A-4.0 4 A-4.0 CONTROLS THE LIGHT IN HALLWAY AT UPPER LEVEL SWITCH TO OUTLETS INSTALL PHOTOCELL INSTALL PHOTOCELL RECIRCULATING RANGE HOOD UPPER CABINETS, TYP. VB EF FAN A B 1 1 2 2 3 3 C D T SSSSUC1 UC1 D1 R1 R1 R1 R1 R1 R1 R1 R1 R1 R1R1 R1 R1 R1 W1 CF CF TSS S S R1 203 202 201 204 208 205207206 213 212 211 210 209 217216214215 205A 204B 201A 205B 204A 202A C C D D 2a 2a VB 3 3 EF FAN 2 D-2.1 MAIN LEVEL RCP & POWER PLAN 1/4" = 1'-0" 2 D-2.1 UPPER LEVEL RCP & POWER PLAN 1/4" = 1'-0" 64 GSPublisherVersion 580.0.6.7 DRAWING NAME PROPOSED ELEVATIONS + MATERIALS SHEET: A-4.0630 WEST MAIN630 WEST MAINASPEN, COJURISDICTION USE REVISION HISTORY DATE 06.28.2023DRAWINGS - LAND USE THE OUTPOST STUDIO LLC architecture | interiors | environment CARBONDALE, CO NOT FOR CONSTRUCTIONDD CC +119'-5 1/2" 3 ROOF LEVEL +119'-5 1/2" 3 ROOF LEVEL 6'-0"216217 111 110 109 NEW GUTTER, TYP. NEW DOWNSPOUT, TYP. 214215 NEW FENCE NEW FIRE STROBE 100'-0" 1 MAIN LEVEL 4 ":1 2 "4":12" 4 ":1 2 " 5 1 /2 ":1 2 "5 1/2":12" E E B A 10'-8 1/2"EXISTING TO REMAINNEW WATER QUALITY FEATURE 1 1 +119'-5 1/2" 3 ROOF LEVEL 213 106 105 212 211 210 209 4":12"4":12"5 1/2":12"100'-0" 1 MIAN LEVEL E EE 2a 2 2 3 3 2'-7 1/2"4'-6"HEAT PUMP OUTDOOR UNITSPAN ABODE 2a 1'-0"104 102104A 203 202 201 101 204 NEW GUTTER, TYP. NEW DOWNSPOUT, TYP. EXISTING OVERHANG TO BE REPAIRED AND REPAINTED NEW EXTERIOR WALL SCONCE, TYP. 101A4":12"4":12" 5 1 /2 ":1 2 "5 1/2":12"4":12"4":12"4":12"3 2 1 NEW WATER QUALITY FEATURE PAN ABODE CC DDA B +119'-5 1/2" 3 ROOF LEVEL 19'-3"EXISTING TO REMAIN3'-1"208 205 NEW GUTTER, TYP. NEW DOWNSPOUT, TYP. NEW EXTERIOR WALL SCONCE, TYP. 207 206 105A EXISTING MOUNTAIN RESCUE SIREN TO REMAIN 100'-0" 1 MAIN LEVEL 4":12" 5 1/2":12"5 1 /2 ":1 2 " 4 ":1 2 " 2 A-4.0 SOUTH ELEVATION 1/4" = 1'-0" 1 A-4.0 EAST ELEVATION 1/4" = 1'-0" 3 A-4.0 WEST ELEVATION 1/4" = 1'-0" 4 A-4.0 NORTH ELEVATION 1/4" = 1'-0" PROPOSED EXTERIOR LIGHT FIXTURE - 4" DIAMETER, 6" HEIGHT EXISTING PAINTED SIDING EXISTING ROOF TO REMAIN SIDING PAINT COLOR SALISBURY GREEN BY BENJAMIN MOORE TRIM PAINT COLOR GLOUCESTER SAGE BY BENJAMIN MOORE FLOWER PLANTING EXAMPLE FOR RAIN GARDEN 65 GSPublisherVersion 580.0.6.7 DRAWING NAME BUILDING SECTIONS SHEET: A-5.0630 WEST MAIN630 WEST MAINASPEN, COJURISDICTION USE REVISION HISTORY DATE 06.28.2023DRAWINGS - LAND USE THE OUTPOST STUDIO LLC architecture | interiors | environment CARBONDALE, CO NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION2 A-7.1 6 A-7.1 1 A-7.2 2 A-7.2 3 A-7.2 9 A-7.1 110'-7 3/4" ROOF LEVEL 106'-8 1/2" EXISTING T.O. PLATE 100' 1 MAIN LEVEL OFFICE 4":12"4 ":1 2 " 4 A-7.1 8 A-7.1 10 A-7.1 11 A-7.1 119'-5 1/2" 3 ROOF LEVEL 5 1 /2 ":1 2 "5 1/2":12" 100' 1 MAIN LEVEL 109'-0" 2 UPPER LEVEL 4 ":1 2 "4":12"4 A-7.1 6 A-7.1 9 A-7.1 10 A-7.1 11 A-7.1 7 A-7.1 12 A-7.1 119'-5 1/2" 3 ROOF LEVEL 3 3 10'-0"19'-0"GARAGE LIVING ROOM UNIT A 5 1 /2 ":1 2 "5 1/2":12" 100' 1 MAIN LEVEL UNIT B 1 1 2 2 2a 2a 1 A-5.0 PAN ABODE SECTION1/4" = 1'-0" 2 A-5.0 SECTION1/4" = 1'-0" 3 A-5.0 SECTION1/4" = 1'-0" 66 GSPublisherVersion 580.0.6.7 DRAWING NAME ASSEMBLIES SHEET: A-7.1630 WEST MAIN630 WEST MAINASPEN, COJURISDICTION USE REVISION HISTORY DATE 06.28.2023DRAWINGS - LAND USE THE OUTPOST STUDIO LLC architecture | interiors | environment CARBONDALE, CO NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION3" PAN ABODE WOOD LOGS PAN ABODE WOOD LOGS LP FLAMEBLOCK 1HR 15/32" FOIL-FACED POLYISO INSULATION ROCKWOOL BATT INSULATION OR EQUIVALENT TYPE X GYPSUM BOARD WOOD FURRING INT.EXT. R-13 R-7 2X6 T&G CEDAR ROOF SHEATHING, VERIFY IN FIELD WATER BARRIER, VERIFY IN FIELD METAL ROOFING PAN ABODE EXISTING ROOF: EXT. INT.5 1/2"5/8" GYPSUM BOARD BATT INSULATION 2X6 T&G CEDAR ROOF SHEATHING, VERIFY IN FIELD WATER BARRIER, VERIFY IN FIELD METAL ROOFING RAFTERS TO ACCOMODATE BATT INSULATION FOIL-FACE POLY-ISOCYANURATE RIGID INSULATION INT. EXT. R-14 R-13 GYPSUM BOARD BATT INSULATION RAFTERS, VERIFY IN FIELD ROOF SHEATHING, VERIFY IN FIELD WATER BARRIER, VERIFY IN FIELD METAL ROOFING EXT. INT. GYPSUM BOARD ROCKWOOL INSULATION OR EQUIV. RAFTERS, VERIFY IN FIELD ROOF SHEATHING, VERIFY IN FIELD WATER BARRIER, VERIFY IN FIELD METAL ROOFING EXT. R-23 INT. WOOD SHIPLAP SIDING EXTERIOR SHEATHING, VERIFY IN FIELD WOOD FRAMING, VERIFY IN FIELD BAT INSULATION, VERIFY IN FIELD GYPSUM BOARD WATER-RESISTIVE BARRIER, VERIFY IN FIELD INT.EXT. WOOD SHIPLAP SIDING EXTERIOR SHEATHING, VERIFY IN FIELD WOOD FRAMING, VERIFY IN FIELD ROCKWOOL BATT INSULATION GYPSUM BOARD WATER-RESISTIVE BARRIER, VERIFY IN FIELD ADDITION PROPOSED WALL: EXT. R-23 INT. FINISH FLOORING T&G DECKING, VERIFY IN FIELD WOOD JOISTS, VERIFY IN FIELD BAT INSULATION, VERIFY IN FIELD INT. CRAWLSPACE FINISH FLOORING PLYWOOD SUBFLOOR, VERIFY IN FIELD WOOD JOISTS, VERIFY IN FIELD BAT INSULATION GYPSUM BOARD INT. INT. FINISH FLOORING PLYWOOD SUBFLOOR, VERIFY IN FIELD WOOD JOISTS, VERIFY IN FIELD ROCKWOOL INSULATION, OR EQUIV. DOUBLE LAYER OF 5/8" TYPE X GYPSUM BOARD INT. INT. GYPSUM BOARD FRAMING, VERIFY IN FIELD ROCKWOOL BATT INSULATION, OR EQUIVALENT DOUBLE LAYER OF 5/8" TYPE X GYPSUM BOARD ADDITION INTERIOR FIRE WALL: INT.INT. 5 A-7.1 PAN ABODE EXISTING EXTERIOR WALL3" = 1'-0" 6 A-7.1 PAN ABODE PROPOSED EXTERIOR WALL3" = 1'-0" 1 A-7.1 PAN ABODE EXISTING ROOF3" = 1'-0" 2 A-7.1 PAN ABODE PROPOSED ROOF3" = 1'-0" 3 A-7.1 ADDITION EXISTING ROOF3" = 1'-0" 4 A-7.1 ADDITION PROPOSED ROOF3" = 1'-0" 7 A-7.1 ADDITION EXISTING EXTERIOR WALL3" = 1'-0" 8 A-7.1 ADDITION PROPOSED EXTERIOR WALL3" = 1'-0" 9 A-7.1 PAN ABODE EXISTING FLOOR TO REMAIN3" = 1'-0" 10 A-7.1 ADDITION EXISTING FLOOR BETWEEN STORIES3" = 1'-0" 11 A-7.1 ADDITION PROPOSED INTERIOR FIRE SEPARATION FLOOR3" = 1'-0" 12 A-7.1 ADDITION PROPOSED INTERIOR FIRE SEPARATION WALL3" = 1'-0" 67 GSPublisherVersion 580.0.6.7 DRAWING NAME DETAILS + ASSEMBLIES SHEET: A-7.2630 WEST MAIN630 WEST MAINASPEN, COJURISDICTION USE REVISION HISTORY DATE 06.28.2023DRAWINGS - LAND USE THE OUTPOST STUDIO LLC architecture | interiors | environment CARBONDALE, CO NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION1 A-7.1 5 A-7.1 EXT.INT. 1 A-7.1 MID-SPAN BEAM 1 A-7.1 RIDGE BEAM RIDGE CAP 2 A-7.1 BOX BEAM TRIM BY GC STEEL PER STRUCTURAL, TYP. (E) ROOF SUBSTRATE TO REMAIN WELDED TAB 24" OC 1" FOIL-FACE POLY-ISO MIN. (E) ROOF TO REMAIN (E) RIDGE BEAM 2 A-7.1 WELDED TAB 24" OC 1" FOIL-FACE POLY-ISO MIN. (E) ROOF SUBSTRATE TO REMAIN (E) ROOF TO REMAIN MID-SPAN BEAM BOX BEAM TRIM BY GC STEEL PER STRUCTURAL, TYP. 2 A-7.1 6 A-7.1 TOP PLATE FOIL-FACE POLY-ISO (E) ROOF SUBSTRATE TO REMAIN (E) ROOF TO REMAIN EXT.INT. 3 A-7.2 PAN ABODE EXISTING EAVE1 1/2"= 1'-0" 2 A-7.2 PAN ABODE EXISTING ROOF AT BEAM1 1/2"= 1'-0" 1 A-7.2 PAN ABODE EXISTING RIDGE DETAIL1 1/2"= 1'-0" 4 A-7.2 PAN ABODE PROPOSED RIDGE DETAIL1 1/2"= 1'-0" 5 A-7.2 PAN ABODE PROPOSED ROOF AT BEAM1 1/2"= 1'-0" 6 A-7.2 PAN ABODE PROPOSED EAVE1 1/2"= 1'-0" 68 GSPublisherVersion 580.0.6.7 DRAWING NAME WINDOW & DOOR SCHEDULE SHEET: A-8.1630 WEST MAIN630 WEST MAINASPEN, COJURISDICTION USE REVISION HISTORY DATE 06.28.2023DRAWINGS - LAND USE THE OUTPOST STUDIO LLC architecture | interiors | environment CARBONDALE, CO NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION101 102 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 1'-7"×1'-7"2'-10"×1'-10"2'-10"×1'-10"2'-10"×1'-10"2'-10"×1'-10"4'-0"×2'-11"5'-9"×4'-1"2'-6"×4'-5"6'-0"×4'-5"2'-6"×4'-5" 4'-8"4'-7"4'-7"5'-1"5'-1"3'-5"2'-3"1'-9"1'-9"1'-9" 6'-3"6'-5"6'-5"6'-11"6'-11"6'-4"6'-4"6'-2"6'-2"6'-2" E.T.R.CASEMENT CASEMENT CASEMENT CASEMENT E.T.R.E.T.R.FIXED (E.T.R.) ----------EGRESS ---- E.T.R.TEMP.------E.T.R.E.T.R.E.T.R. ---------------- UNIT UNIT SIZE (W x H) SILL HEIGHT HEAD HEIGHT 3D VIEW OPERATION EGRESS TEMPERING NOTES 101A 103A 104A 104B 105A 105B 107A 108A 108B 108C 201A 202A 204A 204B 205A 205B 2'-11 1/2"×6'-10 1…2'-6"×6'-8"2'-8"×6'-8"2'-8"×6'-8"18'-1"×7'-11"2'-8"×6'-8"2'-8"×6'-8"2'-6"×6'-10 1/2"5'-6"×6'-0"2'-6"×6'-0"2'-7"×6'-8"2'-0"×6'-10 1/2"2'-6"×6'-8"3'-0"×6'-10 1/2"2'-7"×6'-8"3'-0"×6'-10 1/2" 0"0"0"0"0"0"0"0"2'-2 1/2"2'-2 1/2"0"0"0"0"0"0" 6'-10 1/2"6'-8"6'-8"6'-8"7'-11"6'-8"6'-8"6'-10 1/2"8'-2 1/2"8'-2 1/2"6'-8"6'-10 1/2"6'-8"6'-10 1/2"6'-8"6'-10 1/2" RH RH RH LH --LH RH ----LH --RH --LH -- SWING SWING SWING GARAGE DOOR SWING SWING SLIDING FOLDING SWING FOLDING SWING SLIDING SWING SLIDING SECURITY PRIVACY PRIVACY SECURITY --PASSAGE PRIVACY PASSAGE PASSAGE PRIVACY PASSAGE PRIVACY PASSAGE PRIVACY PASSAGE ------------ PROPOSED DOOR SCHEDULE UNIT UNIT SIZE (W x H) SILL HEIGHT HEAD HEIGHT 2D SYMBOL 3D VIEW HANDING OPERATION DOOR HARDWARE TEMPERING PROPOSED DOOR SCHEDULE 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 2'-3"×1'-5"2'-3"×1'-5"2'-3"×1'-5"2'-11"×3'-3"2'-6"×4'-0"2'-6"×4'-0"2'-6"×4'-0"2'-6"×4'-0"2'-11"×3'-6"2'-11"×3'-6"2'-11"×3'-6"2'-11"×3'-3"2'-11"×3'-3"2'-11"×3'-3"2'-11"×3'-3"2'-3"×1'-5"2'-3"×1'-5" 3'-6"3'-6"3'-6"2'-2"2'-5 1/2"2'-5 1/2"2'-5 1/2"2'-5 1/2"2'-0"2'-0"2'-0"4'-4"4'-4"4'-7"4'-7"3'-6"3'-6" 4'-11"4'-11"4'-11"5'-5"6'-5 1/2"6'-5 1/2"6'-5 1/2"6'-5 1/2"5'-6"5'-6"5'-6"7'-7"7'-7"7'-10"7'-10"4'-11"4'-11" FIXED FIXED FIXED CASEMENT CASEMENT CASEMENT CASEMENT CASEMENT CASEMENT CASEMENT CASEMENT CASEMENT CASEMENT CASEMENT CASEMENT FIXED FIXED --------------------EGRESS -----EGRESS ---- ---------------------------------- --------------------------------- UNIT UNIT SIZE (W x H) SILL HEIGHT HEAD HEIGHT 3D VIEW OPERATION EGRESS TEMPERING NOTES GENERAL NOTES: 1. ALL SOUTH, EAST AND WEST FACING WINDOWS TO HAVE A SHGC OF 0.30 MAXIMUM. NORTH FACING WINDOWS TO HAVE SHGC OF 0.40 MAXIMUM 2. ALL WINDOWS TO HAVE U-VALUE OF .26 OR LOWER (0.32 MAXIMUM PER 2015 IRCC TABLE R402.1.2) 3. ALL SKYLIGHTS TO HAVE A SHGC OF 0.40 MAXIMUM 4. ALL SKYLIGHTS TO HAVE A U-VALUE OF 0.20 OR LOWER (0.55 MAXIMUM PER 2015 IRCC TABLE R402.1.2) 5. ALL SOUTH, EAST AND WEST FACING EXTERIOR DOORS TO HAVE A SHGC OF 0.30 MAXIMUM. NORTH FACING DOORS TO HAVE SHGC OF 0.40 MAXIMUM 6. ALL DOORS TO HAVE U-VALUE OF .26 OR LOWER (0.32 MAXIMUM PER 2015 IRCC TABLE R402.1.2) 7. ALL WINDOWS AND DOORS TO BE STAIN GRADE INTERIOR, WOOD FRAME WITH METAL CLADDING 8. ALL SKYLIGHTS TO HAVE THERMALLY BROKEN FRAME AND MATCHING METAL CLADDING ON EXTERIOR 9. ALL EXISTING WINDOWS TO REMAIN PROPOSED WINDOW SCHEDULE: MAIN LEVEL PROPOSED WINDOW SCHEDULE: UPPER LEVEL 69 CITY OF ASPEN COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT City of Aspen|130 S. Galena St.|(970) 920 5090 April 2020 COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT GENERAL LAND USE PACKET Attached is an Application for review of Development that requires Land Use Review pursuant to The City of Aspen Land Use Code: Included in this package are the following attachments: 1.Development Application Fee Policy, Fee Schedule and Agreement to Pay Application Fees Form 2.Land Use Application Form 3.Dimensional Requirements Form (if required) 4.HOA Compliance Form 5.Development Review Procedure All applications are reviewed based on the criteria established in Title 26 of the Aspen Municipal Code. Title 26 of the Aspen Municipal Code is available at the City Clerk’s Office on the second floor of City Hall and on the internet at https://library.municode.com/co/aspen/codes/municipal_code. We require all applicants to hold a Pre-Application Conference with a Planner in the Community Development Department so that the requirements for submitting a complete application can be fully described. This meeting can happen in person or by phone or email. Also, depending upon the complexity of the development proposed, submitting one copy of the development application to the Case Planner to determine accuracy, inefficiencies, or redundancies can reduce the overall cost of materials and staff time. Please recognize that review of these materials does not substitute for a complete review of the Aspen Land Use Regulations. While this application package attempts to summarize the key provisions of the Code as they apply to your type of development, it cannot possibly replicate the detail or the scope of the Code. If you have questions that are not answered by the materials in this package, we suggest that you contact the staff member assigned to your case, contact Planner of the Day (970-429-2764/planneroftheday@gmail.com), or consult the applicable sections of the Aspen Land Use Code. 70 CITY OF ASPEN COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT City of Aspen|130 S. Galena St.|(970) 920 5090 April 2020 Land Use Review Fee Policy The City of Aspen has established a review fee policy for the processing of land use applications. A flat fee or deposit is collected for land use applications based on the type of application submitted. A flat fee is collected by Community Development for applications that normally take a minimal and predictable amount of staff time to process. Review fees for other City Departments reviewing the application (referral departments) also will be collected when necessary. Flat fees are cumulative, i.e., an application with multiple flat fees must pay the sum of those flat fees. Flat fees are not refundable. A review fee deposit is collected by Community Development when more extensive staff time is required. Actual staff time spent will be charged against the deposit. Various City staff also may charge their time spent on the case in addition to the Case Planner. The deposit amount may be reduced if, in the opinion of the Community Development Department Director, the project is expected to take significantly less time to process than the deposit indicates. A determination on the deposit amount shall be made during the pre-application conference by the Case Planner. Hourly billing shall still apply. All applications must include an Agreement to Pay Application Fees. One payment including the deposit for Planning and referral agency fees must be submitted with each land use application, made payable to the City of Aspen. Applications will not be accepted for processing without the required fee(s). The Community Development Department shall keep an accurate record of the actual time required to process a land use application requiring a deposit. The City can provide a summary report of fees due at the applicant’s request. The applicant will be billed for the additional costs incurred by the City when the processing of an application by the Community Development Department takes more time or expense than is covered by the deposit. Any direct costs attributable to a project review shall be billed to the applicant with no additional administrative charge. In the event the processing of an application takes less time than provided for by the deposit, the Department shall refund the unused portion of the deposited fee to the applicant. Fees shall be due regardless of whether an applicant receives approval. Unless otherwise combined by the Director for simplicity of billing, all applications for conceptual, final, and recordation of approval documents shall be handled as individual cases for the purpose of billing. Upon conceptual approval, all billing shall be reconciled, and past due invoices shall be paid prior to the Director accepting an application for final review. Final review shall require a new deposit at the rate in effect at the time of final submission. Upon final approval, all billing shall again be reconciled prior to the Director accepting an application for review of technical documents for recordation. The Community Development Director may cease processing of a land use application for which an unpaid invoice is 30 or more days past due. Unpaid invoices of 90 days or more past due may be assessed a late fee of 1.75% per month. An unpaid invoice of 120 days or more may be subject to additional actions as may be assigned by the Municipal Court judge. All payment information is public domain. All invoices shall be paid prior to issuance of a Development Order or recordation of development agreements and plats. The City will not accept a building permit for a property until all invoices are paid in full. For permits already accepted, any unpaid invoice of 90 or more days may result in cessation of building permit processing or issuance of a stop work order until full payment is made. The property owner of record is the party responsible for payment of all costs associated with a land use application for the property. Any secondary agreement between a property owner and an applicant representing the owner (e.g. a contract purchaser) regarding payment of fees is solely between those private parties. 71 CITY OF ASPEN COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT City of Aspen|130 S. Galena St.|(970) 920 5090 April 2020 Agreement to Pay Application Fees An agreement between the City of Aspen (“City”) and Address of Property: Please type or print in all caps Property Owner Name: Representative Name (if different from Property Owner): Billing Name and Address - Send Bills to: Contact info for billing: e-mail: Phone: I understand that the City has adopted, via Ordinance No. 20, Series of 2020, review fees for Land Use applications, and payment of these fees is a condition precedent to determining application completeness. I understand that as the property owner, I am responsible for paying all fees for this development application. For flat fees and referral fees: I agree to pay the following fees for the services indicated. I understand that these flat fees are non-refundable. $. flat fee for . $. flat fee for $. flat fee for . $. flat fee for For deposit cases only: The City and I understand that because of the size, nature, or scope of the proposed project, it is not possible at this time to know the full extent or total costs involved in processing the application. I understand that additional costs over and above the deposit may accrue. I understand and agree that it is impracticable for City staff to complete processing, review, and presentation of sufficient information to enable legally required findings to be made for project consideration unless invoices are paid in full. The City and I understand and agree that invoices sent by the City to the above listed billing address and not returned to the City shall be considered by the City as being received by me. I agree to remit payment within 30 days of presentation of an invoice by the City for such services. I have read, understood, and agree to the Land Use Review Fee Policy, including consequences for non-payment. I agree to pay the following initial deposit amounts for the specified hours of staff time. I understand that payment of a deposit does not render an application complete or compliant with approval criteria. If actual recorded costs exceed the initial deposit, I agree to pay additional monthly billings to the City to reimburse the City for processing my application at the hourly rates hereinafter stated. $ deposit for hours of Community Development Department staff time. Additional time above the deposit amount will be billed at $325.00 per hour. $ deposit for hours of Engineering Department staff time. Additional time above the deposit amount will be billed at $325.00 per hour. City of Aspen: Phillip Supino, AICP Community Development Director City Use: Fees Due: $ Received $ Case # Signature: PRINT Name: Title: 72 CITY OF ASPEN COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT City of Aspen|130 S. Galena St.|(970) 920 5090 April 2020 LAND USE APPLICATION APPLICANT: REPRESENTIVATIVE: Description: Existing and Proposed Conditions Review: Administrative or Board Review Required Land Use Review(s): Growth Management Quota System (GMQS) required fields: Net Leasable square footage Lodge Pillows Free Market dwelling units Affordable Housing dwelling units Essential Public Facility square footage Have you included the following? FEES DUE: $ Pre-Application Conference Summary Signed Fee Agreement HOA Compliance form All items listed in checklist on PreApplication Conference Summary Name: Address: Phone#: email: Address: Phone #: email: Name: Project Name and Address: Parcel ID # (REQUIRED) 73 CITY OF ASPEN COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT City of Aspen|130 S. Galena St.|(970) 920 5090 April 2020 DIMENSIONAL REQUIREMENTS FORM Complete only if required by the PreApplication checklist Project and Location Applicant: Zone District: Gross Lot Area: Net Lot Area: **Please refer to section 26.575.020 for information on how to calculate Net Lot Area Please fill out all relevant dimensions Single Family and Duplex Residential 1) Floor Area (square feet) 2) Maximum Height 3) Front Setback 4) Rear Setback 5) Side Setbacks 6) Combined Side Setbacks 7) % Site Coverage Existing Allowed Proposed Multi-family Residential 1)Number of Units 2)Parcel Density (see 26.710.090.C.10) 3)FAR (Floor Area Ratio) 4)Floor Area (square feet) Existing Allowed Proposed 8) Minimum distance between buildings Proposed % of demolition 5) Maximum Height 6) Front Setback 7) Rear Setback 8) Side Setbacks Proposed % of demolition Commercial Proposed Use(s) Existing Allowed Proposed 1) FAR (Floor Area Ratio) 2) Floor Area (square feet) 3) Maximum Height 4) Off-Street Parking Spaces 5) Second Tier (square feet) 6) Pedestrian Amenity (square feet) Proposed % of demolition Existing non-conformities or encroachments: Variations requested: Lodge Additional Use(s) 1)FAR (Floor Area Ratio) 2)Floor Area (square feet) 3)Maximum Height 4)Free Market Residential(square feet) 4)Front setback 5)Rear setback 6)Side setbacks 7)Off-Street Parking Spaces 8)Pedestrian Amenity (square feet) Proposed % of demolition Existing Allowed Proposed 74 75 PRE-APPLICATION CONFERENCE SUMMARY PLANNER: Garrett Larimer, garrett.larimer@aspen.gov DATE: December 14, 2022 PROJECT LOCATION: 630 W. Main Street REQUEST: Historic Preservation, Growth Management, Affordable Housing Reviews REPRESENTATIVE: Jennifer Phelan, Capital Asset, City of Aspen DESCRIPTION: 630 W. Main St. contains a historic pan abode with a second story addition from the 1980s. The property is the former Aspen Mountain Rescue building and currently houses City of Aspen offices, so the property contains a commercial use. The property is a historic landmark designated property with non-historic additions and is in the Public zone district. The scope of work being presented is to convert the property to a 100% deed restricted affordable housing project. Interior renovation work will be done and will need to meet APCHA requirements for affordable housing units. Minor exterior improvements, such as replacement or minor enlargement to windows in the non-historic portion of the structure are contemplated. The applicant indicated the possibility of additional windows on the non-street facing portions of the pan abode, however, HP staff indicated a concerned with, and discourages, any changes to the pan abode that are not reversible, such as additional penetrations. Parking, exterior and detached storage, and mechanical area will be located toward the rear of the property. Conversion to 100% affordable housing requires a Change-in use and Conditional Use approval. These two reviews require a board review regardless of the remaining scope and design, and it’s recommended that all associated reviews be consolidated into a single review with the Historic Preservation Commission, for expediency. If the applicant wishes to explore bifurcating eligible administrative reviews, they should continue to work with Planning Staff to evaluate review process alternatives. Depending on the extent of the exterior changes the project may be eligible for a Certificate of No Negative Effect if the exterior alterations to the pan abode alter no more than two elements of non- primary facades of the designated building. If more than 2 elements are altered, the project will be subject to Minor Development review by the Historic Preservation Commission. Regardless of the scope of exterior changes and review level required, it’s recommended that all reviews be combined in a single review with the HPC. Growth Management Quota System review is required for the creation of 100% Deed restricted affordable housing. Conversion to 100%% affordable housing may be reviewed and approved administratively if no variations to the affordable housing standards are varied and the parking requirements are met (Section 26.470.090.D). However, given the recommendation to consolidate reviews for efficiency, if the project qualifies for Administrative GMQS review for the creation of Affordable Housing units, that review should be combined in a single review with HPC. If variations to the affordable housing standards or parking requirements are required, a different section of GMQS review must be considered and approved by HPC (Section 26.470.100.C). Special Review may also be required for any variations (Section 26.430.040.I). 76 Affordable housing units developed or created by the City of Aspen are not eligible to receive Certificates of Affordable Housing Credit pursuant to 26.540.030.B.3. Dimensional limitations for the Public zone district are established through the Planned Development process. Density, height, floor area, parking requirements, and setbacks are relevant dimensional limitations that should be memorialized through a Minor Amendment to a Planned Development Detailed review. The application should include existing and proposed dimensions. The PD Amendment may be combined with other associated reviews with the P&Z or HPC. The Transportation and Parking Management section of the land use code establishes that the parking requirement inside the infill area is the lesser of 1 parking unit per bedroom or 2 units per dwelling unit. Since the project will contain a duplex, the code requires that the parking requirement be provided on-site. Since the property is a Historic Landmark, a parking waiver may be requested by the HPC, although requests for parking waivers for 100% AH projects have complicated the conversation in previous board reviews for similar projects, so parking waivers should be evaluated with scrutiny. The project may also establish parking requirements through the establishment of Planned Development dimensional requirements through the Minor Amendment to the Planned Development. The applicant should indicate how they intend to establish and provide compliant parking for the project. Since the project results in a duplex residential dwelling, it is Exempt from Transportation Impact Analysis. Prior to the preparation of a recommendation to HPC, staff will refer the application to other City referral Departments for comments and proposed conditions of approval. Standard public noticing requirements for a public hearing will be required. Relevant documents in the review will include the land use code, the Historic Preservation Design Guidelines. Please note that the historic structure is exempt from Residential Design Standards review. RELEVANT LAND USE CODE SECTIONS: Section Number Section Title 26.304 Common Development Review Procedures 26.415.070.B Certificate of No Negative Effect 26.415.070.C Historic Preservation – Minor Development 26.415.110.C Historic Preservation Variations, Benefits 26.425.040 Conditional Use 26.430.040 Special Review (AH unit or Parking standards, as needed) 26.445.110.E Planned Development – Minor Amendment to a Detailed Review Approval 26.470.080 General Review Standards: Affordable Housing 26.470.090.D 100% Affordable Housing Development – Admin. Review 26.470.100.C 100% Affordable Housing Development – P&Z/HPC Review 26.515 Transportation and Parking Management 26.575.020 Calculations and Measurements 26.710.250 Public (PUB) Zone District 77 For your convenience – links to the Land Use Application and Land Use Code are below: Land Use Application Land Use Code Historic Preservation Design Guidelines Review by: Staff for completeness and a recommendation. HPC for a decision. Public Hearing: Yes Neighborhood Outreach: No Referrals: Yes, the project will be referred to APCHA and Building. Depending on the extent of site work, the application may be referred to Engineering and Parks. This will be determined during completeness review. Fees: $0 for planning staff time (100% Affordable Housing Fee Waiver) Referral fees: APCHA - $325 deposit for 1 hour of review (Additional/ lesser deposit hours will be billed/ refunded at a rate of $325 per hour) * IF APPLICABLE * Engineering - $325 deposit for 1 hour of review (Additional/ lesser deposit hours will be billed/ refunded at a rate of $325 per hour) Parks - $975 flat fee, Total: $325 (*If Engineering and Parks referral reviews are required, $1,625) APPLICATION CHECKLIST: Below is a list of submittal requirements. Please email the application as one pdf to garrett.larimer@aspen.gov for an initial determination of completeness.  Completed Land Use Application and signed Fee Agreement.  Pre-application Conference Summary (this document).  Street address and legal description of the parcel on which development is proposed to occur, consisting of a current (no older than 6 months) certificate from a title insurance company, an ownership and encumbrance report, or attorney licensed to practice in the State of Colorado, listing the names of all owners of the property, and all mortgages, judgments, liens, easements, contracts and agreements affecting the parcel, and demonstrating the owner’s right to apply for the Development Application.  Applicant’s name, address and telephone number in a letter signed by the applicant that states the name, address and telephone number of the representative authorized to act on behalf of the applicant. 78  HOA Compliance form  List of adjacent property owners for both properties within 300’ for public hearing.  An 8 1/2” by 11” vicinity map locating the parcel within the City of Aspen.  Site improvement survey including topography and vegetation showing the current status, certified by a registered land surveyor, licensed in the state of Colorado.  A written description of the proposal and an explanation of how the proposed development complies with the relevant review standards and design guidelines (please note that landmarks are except from the Residential Design Standards.)  Scaled site plan and drawings of all proposed structures or additions.  Supplemental materials to provide a visual description of the context surrounding the designated historic property including photographs and other exhibits, as needed, to accurately depict location and extent of proposed work.  Floor area and net livable square footage calculations for the building and each residential unit in the development.  If applicable, the conditions under which reductions from net minimum livable square footage requirements are requested according to APCHA guidelines.  Proposed Category Designation of sale or rental restriction for each unit in the development.  Proposed employees housed by the affordable housing unit in increments of no less than one one-hundredth (0.01) according to Section 26.470.100.2- Employees Housed.  A preliminary lighting plan and landscape plan, including any visible stormwater mitigation features. Once the copy is deemed complete by staff, the application fee will be requested. Disclaimer: The foregoing summary is advisory in nature only and is not binding on the City. The summary is based on current zoning, which is subject to change in the future, and upon factual representations that may or may not be accurate. The summary does not create a legal or vested right. 79 CITY OF ASPEN COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT  FEE WAIVER POLICY    PURPOSE  Fee waivers to eligible individuals and organizations submitting for building permit or land use  application may be considered upon filing a fee waiver request form to the Community Development  Department.  Approval of fee waiver requests may be made by the Community Development Director,  according to the adopted fee policy of the City of Aspen.  Costs for all building permit and land use  applications, other than those waived by the Community Development Director, shall be paid as  specified by the fee policy; prior to the issuance of building permits and at the time of submittal of land  use applications.    PROCESS  Fees administered by the Community Development Department can only be waived by submitting a  completed fee waiver form to the Community Development Director.  The request shall contain a  description of the project along with a statement expressing eligibility for fee waiver.  The Community  Development Director will review the request and give approval or disapproval in accordance with  provisions set forth in this policy.  The Community Development Director does not have the ability to  waive fees administered by other City Departments or other organizations.    All organizations and individuals seeking fee waiver MUST submit their written request to the City of  Aspen Community Development Director prior to submitting the building permit or land use application.   The approved fee waiver must then be presented at the time the building permit or land use application  is submitted to the building or planning departments.      ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA  General Fund Departments do not pay fees to the Community Development Department for building  permits or planning applications, with the exception of Capital Projects.  The fees waived for these  projects will be tracked by the Community Development Department (journal entries are therefore  unnecessary).  In effort to keep paperwork and applications consistent, General Fund Departments shall  still be required to submit the approved fee waiver with all applications for building and planning  applications.    General Fund Departments include:    General Fund Departments FUND.DEPT   General Fund Departments FUND.DEPT     Non‐Departmental 001.00  Streets Department 001.41     City Council 001.03   Parks Department 001.55      City Manager 001.05   GIS Department 001.60      Personnel 001.06   IT Department 001.61      City Clerk 001.07   Special Events 001.70      City Attorney 001.09   Recreation Activities 001.71      Risk Management 001.10   Aspen Recreation Center (ARC) 001.72      City Finance Department 001.11   Ice Garden Operations 001.74      Community Development  001.13   Cons. Trust FD/Lottery 001.75      Engineering Department 001.15   *Capital Projects 001.90      Building Department 001.21   Asset Management Plan (AMP) 001.91      Environmental Health 001.25   *Tabor Capital Projects 001.94      Police Department 001.31   Outgoing Transfers 001.95      Records 001.33         Communications 001.39   NOTE* Capital Projects are not exempt from fees                     80 Fee Waiver Request Form  City of Aspen  Community Development Department    This form should be completed and submitted to the Community Development Director for review.  You will be notified when a decision has been  made to waive or not to waive the fees regarded in this request form.      For what fees are you requesting waiver?        BUILDING       PLANNING    Applicant Name:       Contact Ph.#      Mailing address:                      E‐mail address:                Project name & address:                                                              Fee Breakdown:    BUILDING & PLANNING FEES  Fee Description Original Fee  Amount  Requested  Waiver Fee Description Original Fee  Amount  Requested  Waiver  Energy Code Fee     REMP Fee      Excavation Foundation Fee     Zoning Review Fee      Inspection Fee     Planning Application Fee      Permit Fee     HPC Application Fee      Plan Check     Other:               TOTAL OF FEE WAIVER REQUEST $                        Reason for Waiver:      General Fund Department    Waived or decreased by City Council (specify ordinance or other decision document)    Other—Please explain:                                                                       Applicant Signature                 Date    For office use only:    Type of fees waived:                                                                   Total fees waived: $        APPROVED    DISAPPROVED                                 Community Development Director                              Date  81 Date:  Department:  Amount Requested:  Expense Account Number:  Project / Task Number:  Description:  Requested By:  Received By:  Community Development Department INTERNAL FUNDS TRANSFER 82 Exhibit F Staff Referral Comments 1 STAFF REFERRAL COMMENTS In preparation for this review, staff referred the application to the Parks Department, Engineering Department, and the Aspen Pitkin County Housing Authority (APCHA). Each had comments that affect HPC’s decisions. Comments that are important to the final approvals have been made mention of below. Condition of approvals have been clarified in the Resolution and additionally include those from the Historic Preservation and Planning teams. Engineering Department • The project appears of size and scope to qualify as a major engineering review. The applicant will be required to follow the requirements of a major development within the Urban Runoff Management Plan and bring the site into compliance with Engineering standards. Parks Department • Concrete sidewalk requires 1 ft border to protect historic resource. Concrete walkway design will need to eliminate excavation of subgrade soil within spruce dripline, a possible floating detail may apply. • Apple Tree in ROW will be removed. CoA will remove tree and will replant two (2) Street Trees to be provided by Parks Department. Street Trees to be planted 15’ on center. • Irrigation is required in front yard to back of curb including irrigation of new (2) Street Trees. APCHA • A deed restriction shall be recorded on the property allowing for the units to be either rental or ownership units with up to a RO designation. • All potential buyers/tenants need to be approved as a qualified Pitkin County employee prior to entering into a contract to purchase or signing a lease as a tenant. • Each unit must contain a closet in the bedrooms as specified in the APCHA Regulations, contain a full kitchen as well as accommodate for a washer and dryer. • Each unit will have access to one parking space located within the garage. • The City shall try and meet minimum Occupancy requirements – one person per bedroom – as defined in the Regulations. • The units shall have the flexibility to change categories based on the occupancy of the tenant/owner. 83 420 East Durant Avenue – Minor PD Amendment, Minor HP Development and Commercial Design Review Historic Preservation Commission Page 1 of 6 427 Rio Grande Place, Aspen, CO 81611 | cityofaspen.com MEMORANDUM TO: Aspen Historic Preservation Commission THRU: Amy Simon, Planning Director FROM: Jeffrey Barnhill, Planner II MEETING DATE: July 12, 2023 RE: 420 E. Durant Avenue, Rubey Park Transit Center –Minor Planned Development Amendment, Minor Development and Commercial Design Review, PUBLIC HEARING APPLICANT /OWNER: The City of Aspen, 427 Rio Grande Place REPRESENTATIVE: Kyla Smits, Project Manager 1, City of Aspen Engineering Department LOCATION: Street Address: 420 E. Durant Avenue Legal Description: Lot: K thru S, Block: 90, City and Townsite of Aspen Parcel Identification Number: 2737-182-21-851 CURRENT ZONING & USE Public; Government Office/Essential Public Facility SUMMARY: 420 East Durant Avenue is located in the Commercial Core Historic District and is a non-landmarked property owned by the City of Aspen. Currently, 420 East Durant Avenue is home to the Rubey Park Transit Center operated by the Roaring Fork Transportation Authority. The applicant proposes the installation of three electric charging stations on the site. These improvements include the overhead chargers, three power cabinets, switchgear, and a new transformer. The applicant wishes to memorialize the location of all three charging station locations but only wishes to build one charging station at this time. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends approval of the electric charging stations with condition identified in the attached resolution, to require a material sample for the charger arm prior to purchase. Figure 1: Site Location – 420 E Durant Avenue 84 420 East Durant Avenue – Minor PD Amendment, Minor HP Development and Commercial Design Review Historic Preservation Commission Page 2 of 6 427 Rio Grande Place, Aspen, CO 81611 | cityofaspen.com BACKGROUND: 420 E. Durant Avenue (Rubey Park Transit Center) is an Essential Public Facility located in the Commercial Core Historic District. The property is not historically landmarked and contains no historically designated buildings. Additionally, the property is owned by the City of Aspen and the transportation network is managed by the Roaring Fork Transportation Authority (RFTA). Rubey Park Transit Center was first approved in 1987 as a small bus station with parking and drop off/pick up zones. In 2014, the property received Planned Development and Growth Management Approvals from City Council. These approvals led to the current configuration of the Rubey Park Transit Center. The property consists of a main structure with a waiting room and informational booths, dedicated bus pick up and drop off areas, and layover parking bays. The applicant proposes to construct three overhead electric bus charging stations. The City of Aspen has worked towards lofty, comprehensive sustainability and climate initiatives since the early 2000s. This led to, most recently, the adoption of the Electric Vehicle Public Charging Infrastructure Masterplan and the Aspen Sustainability Action Plan. This Masterplan and Action Plan are the guiding documents propelling this project forward. One key piece of these plans was the direction to implement more electric mass transit to help reduce emissions, reduce congestion on Highway 82, and promote the use of public transit. The bus chargers are being developed to meet these high expectations of the community and City Council. In conjunction with these expectations, RFTA has committed to updating 30% of their fleet to 100 percent electric by 2040. REQUEST OF HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION (HPC): The Historic Preservation Commission (HPC) is the final review authority. The scope of this application is subject to Notice of Call-Up at City Council. HPC shall consider the following sections from Title 26 as related to this application: • Planned Development (PD) Minor Amendment to a Detailed Review approval (Section 26.445.110) for amendments to memorialize updated site improvements. • Minor Development (Section 26.415.070.C) for new construction of the charging stations on site. • Commercial Design Review (Section 26.412) for development of an Essential Public Facility within the Aspen Infill Area that requires a building permit. It is important to note that because this is a property located within the Commercial Core Historic District, but not a designated landmark, it is only subject to the Commercial, Lodging and Historic District Design Standards and Guidelines but is not subject to the Historic Preservation Design Guidelines. PROJECT SUMMARY: The applicant proposes to construct three electric overhead charging stations at the Rubey Park Transit Center. The applicant wishes to memorialize the locations of all three charging stations; however, they wish to only construct one charging station currently with the other two planned for a later date. This is due to the first phase receiving a significant sum of money from the Colorado Department of Transportation (CDOT) to complete the project before the year ends. The charging 85 420 East Durant Avenue – Minor PD Amendment, Minor HP Development and Commercial Design Review Historic Preservation Commission Page 3 of 6 427 Rio Grande Place, Aspen, CO 81611 | cityofaspen.com stations consist of an overhead charger (charging arm), three power cabinets, switchgear, and a transformer. These mechanical equipment and utilities will be located in the existing rain garden on site adjacent to the alleyway. This project is a large step forward for the City of Aspen and RFTA to meet their sustainability and climate goals. Figure 2: Proposed Charging Station Locations STAFF COMMENTS: Exhibits A and B identify the review criteria and design guidelines to be considered for this application. Section 26.445.110, PD Minor Amendment to a Detailed Review approval (Exhibit A) In review of the Minor Planned Development Amendment to a Detailed Review Approval. Staff found that all criteria were either met or not applicable to the project. Further context is provided in Exhibit A of this memo. The proposed application requests updates to the PD to ensure that the alterations to physical characteristics and the charging station locations are memorialized. The applicant proposes to memorialize the locations of all the overhead charger locations on site but endeavors to construct one (1) currently. The Rubey Park Transit Center was developed in 1987 and was utilized as an Essential Public Facility. The Planned Development was amended in 2014 and was subject to several site approvals (P&Z Resolution No. 11, Series of 2014, Council Ordinance No. 22, Series of 2014, HPC Resolution No. 5, Series of 2014, and HPC Resolution No. 29, Series of 2014). The proposed bus chargers are consistent with the use on site as a public transit facility . The chargers are also consistent with the dimensional limitations set forth in the Project Review Approvals. The bus chargers are 86 420 East Durant Avenue – Minor PD Amendment, Minor HP Development and Commercial Design Review Historic Preservation Commission Page 4 of 6 427 Rio Grande Place, Aspen, CO 81611 | cityofaspen.com considered accessory improvements and not part of any building. Installing the chargers has no impact on any aspects associated with Project Review Approvals (floor ar ea, parking, building mass, etc.). At the conclusion of the proposed changes, the use and character of the project will remain the same. The applicant proposes changes to the landscaping along the rain garden on site to accommodate the mechanical equipment for the overhead bus chargers. The overhead bus chargers require upgrades to the existing electrical transformers, switchgear, and the installation of an electrical distribution panel. The applicant has worked extensively with the Parks Department on the required plantings as well as the Community Development Department on the design and screening for the mechanical equipment in the landscaped area. Additionally, the proposed changes do not negatively affect site drainage. The existing rain garden has the capacity to treat the additional impervious area. Figure 3: Transformer, switchgear, power cabinet, and charging arm locations The overhead chargers and associated utility equipment are located adjacent to the alleyway and are set away from the street and transit building. Plantings are proposed to shield the equipment to the extent practicable. The applicant states that this work will be completed in accordance with the “EV Public Charging Infrastructure Masterplan.” The EV Public Charging Masterplan provides action items and responsibility outlines for the expansion and management of municipally owned and operated EV charging infrastructure for the next five years: 2021 through 2026. The proposed changes are designed to improve the existing transit on site. The chargers will effectively continue the City’s goal of electrifying the City’s transit. The overhead bus chargers will allow for greater utilization of 87 420 East Durant Avenue – Minor PD Amendment, Minor HP Development and Commercial Design Review Historic Preservation Commission Page 5 of 6 427 Rio Grande Place, Aspen, CO 81611 | cityofaspen.com the existing electric bus fleet. The chargers can significantly top up a battery in the 10–15- minute layover times that RFTA typically operates at. The chargers operate fast enough that the buses will not need to be rotated out of service and down to the bus barn/fuel station at the AABC during the day to charge . Staff finds that amending the PD to memorialize current conditions and requested future development is appropriate and meets the review criteria in Section 26.445.070 - Detailed Review Standards. Section 26.412 Minor Development and Commercial Design Review approval (Exhibit B) The property is not historically landmarked and contains no historically designated buildings. Located on the south boundary of the district, the property is adjacent to Wagner Park Rugby Stadium and the pedestrian mall. The buildings located immediately to the north and east of Rubey Park Transit Station are not historically designated. As a transit station with significant need for vehicle circulation and functions that are atypical of the district, few of the design guidelines address the proposed scope of work. It is worth acknowledging the importance to balance the Commercial Design Standards with evolving community goals (i.e., the EV Public Charing Infrastructure Masterplan), and changes in technology. The charging stations measure eighteen feet in height, which is substantially taller than most mechanical/utility equipment typically seen in Aspen , but considerably lower than the allowance for adjacent building height. Community Development, Engineering, Parks and RFTA have worked together to find the least visually impactful location for the charging stations and associated equipment. Given the surrounding context, staff finds that siting the chargers and associated equipment along the northern side of the property to be the least visually impactful location. The applicant has selected chargers that are simple, with minimal lighting. No representation has been made as to the color of the charging arms, but the application indicates the various cabinets will be green. The applicant asserts that the location and size of the system align with the EV Charging Masterplan by creating “highly visible [locations] (to incentivize and educate others).” The applicant proposes a reconfiguration of the landscaping in the rain garden surrounding the new charging arms and associated mechanical equipment to shield the charging arm mechanical equipment to the extent practicable. The applicant has thoroughly considered the stormwater implications with this project. The rain garden will continue to be utilized in the existing location. The applicant states that the existing stormwater system can manage the increased load of the additional impervious area. The most significant criterion for this project is Materials. The charging station components will primarily feature metal. Metal has been utilized on Modern, non-landmarked properties in the Commercial Core Historic District and have shown proven durabili ty. The material shall be non-reflective, to blend in with the surroundings. A sample to confirm the finish is suggested as a condition of approval. Although the bus charging stations will be eighteen 88 420 East Durant Avenue – Minor PD Amendment, Minor HP Development and Commercial Design Review Historic Preservation Commission Page 6 of 6 427 Rio Grande Place, Aspen, CO 81611 | cityofaspen.com feet tall, the charging arm height is required to fit over the buses to charge. Staff believes that these charging arms and associated utilities and mechanical equipment will represent a minimal change to the character of this site and context of this block. Staff acknowledges that some mechanical equipment (transformers) cannot be painted. Staff finds that the Commercial Design Guidelines are met. REFERRAL COMMENTS: In preparation for this review, staff referred the application to the Parks Department. The applicant has worked extensively with Community Development and Parks on the plantings and screening of some of the larger mechanical equipment. Parks has no issues with the project as proposed. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends the Historic Preservation Commission (HPC) approve this application as proposed, with the condition listed in the Resolution, for the memorialization of the charging station locations, mechanical equipment locations, and the construction of the charging stations. ATTACHMENTS: Resolution #__, Series of 2023 Exhibit A – Minor Planned Development Staff Findings Exhibit B – Minor Development and Commercial Design Review Staff Findings Exhibit C – Application 89 HPC Resolution #__, Series of 2023 Page 1 of 3 RESOLUTION #___ (SERIES OF 2023) A RESOLUTION OF THE ASPEN HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION (HPC) GRANTING PLANNED DEVELOPMENT MINOR AMENDMENT, MINOR DEVELOPMENT, AND COMMERCIAL DESIGN REVIEW FOR THE PROPERTY LOCATED AT 420 EAST DURANT AVENUE, LOTS K THRU S, BLOCK 90, CITY AND TOWNSITE OF ASPEN, COLORADO PARCEL ID: 2737-182-21-851 WHEREAS, the applicant, The City of Aspen, 427 Rio Grande Place, represented by Kyla Smits, Project Manager 1, City of Aspen Engineering Department, has requested HPC approval for Planned Development Minor Amendment, Minor Development, and Commercial Design Review for the property located at 420 East Durant Avenue, Lots K thru S Block 90,; City and Townsite of Aspen, Colorado; and WHEREAS, Section 26.415.070 of the Municipal Code states that “no building or structure shall be erected, constructed, enlarged, altered, repaired, relocated or improved involving a designated historic property or district until plans or sufficient information have been submitted to the Community Development Director and approved in accordance with the procedures established for their review;” and WHEREAS, for approval of Planned Development Amendments, the application shall meet the requirements of Aspen Municipal Code Section 26.445.110, Planned Development Minor Amendment to a Detailed Review approval; and WHEREAS, for Minor Development Review, the HPC must review the application, a staff analysis report and the evidence presented at a hearing to determine the project’s conformance with the City of Aspen Historic Preservation Design Guidelines per Section 26.415.070.C of the Municipal Code and other applicable Code Sections. The HPC may approve, disapprove, approve with conditions or continue the application to obtain additional information necessary to make a decision to approve or deny; and WHEREAS, for approval of Commercial Design Review, the application shall meet the requirements of Aspen Municipal Code Section 26.412.040, Standards applicable to all projects requiring Commercial Design Review; and WHEREAS, Community Development Department staff reviewed the application for compliance with applicable review standards and recommended approval with conditions; and WHEREAS, HPC reviewed the project on July 12, 2023. HPC considered the application, the staff memo and public comment, and found the proposal consistent with the review standards and granted approval as proposed by a vote of __ to __. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED: 90 HPC Resolution #__, Series of 2023 Page 2 of 3 Section 1: Approval That HPC hereby approves Planned Development Minor Amendment, Minor Development, and Commercial Design Review for 420 East Durant Avenue with the following condition: A sample of the cladding material on the charger arms representing the proposed finish will be reviewed and approved by HPC staff and monitor prior to purchase of the equipment to ensure that the finish is non-reflective. Section 2: Material Representations All material representations and commitments made by the Applicant pursuant to the development proposal approvals as herein awarded, whether in public hearing or documentation presented before the Community Development Department, the Historic Preservation Commission, or the Aspen City Council are hereby incorporated in such plan development approvals and the same shall be complied with as if fully set forth herein, unless amended by other specific conditions or an authorized authority. Section 3: Existing Litigation This Resolution shall not affect any existing litigation and shall not operate as an abatement of any action or proceeding now pending under or by virtue of the ordinances repealed or amended as herein provided, and the same shall be conducted and concluded under such prior ordinances. Section 4: Severability If any section, subsection, sentence, clause, phrase, or portion of this Resolution is for any reason held invalid or unconstitutional in a court of competent jurisdiction, such portion shall be deemed a separate, distinct and independent provision and shall not affect the validity of the remaining portions thereof. Section 5: Vested Rights The development approvals granted herein shall constitute a site-specific development plan vested for a period of three (3) years from the date of issuance of a development order. However, any failure to abide by any of the terms and conditions attendant to this approval shall result in the forfeiture of said vested property rights. Unless otherwise exempted or extended, failure to properly record all plats and agreements required to be recorded, as specified herein, within 180 days of the effective date of the development order shall also result in the forfeiture of said vested property rights and shall render the development order void within the meaning of Section 26.104.050 (Void permits). Zoning that is not part of the approved site-specific development plan shall not result in the creation of a vested property right. No later than fourteen (14) days following final approval of all requisite reviews necessary to obtain a development order as set forth in this Ordinance, the City Clerk shall cause to be published in a newspaper of general circulation within the jurisdictional boundaries of the City of Aspen, a notice advising the general public of the approval of a site specific development plan and creation of a vested property right pursuant to this Title. Such notice shall be substantially in the following form: Notice is hereby given to the general public of the approval of a site specific development plan, and the creation of a vested property right, valid for a period of three (3) years, pursuant to the Land Use Code of the City of Aspen and Title 24, Article 68, Colorado Revised Statutes, pertaining to the following described property: 420 East Durant Avenue. 91 HPC Resolution #__, Series of 2023 Page 3 of 3 Nothing in this approval shall exempt the development order from subsequent reviews and approvals required by this approval of the general rules, regulations and ordinances or the City of Aspen provided that such reviews and approvals are not inconsistent with this approval. The approval granted hereby shall be subject to all rights of referendum and judicial review; the period of time permitted by law for the exercise of such rights shall not begin to run until the date of publication of the notice of final development approval as required under Section 26.304.070(A). The rights of referendum shall be limited as set forth in the Colorado Constitution and the Aspen Home Rule Charter. APPROVED BY THE COMMISSION at its regular meeting on the 12th day of July, 2023. Approved as to Form: Approved as to Content: ________________________________ ________________________________ Katharine Johnson, Assistant City Attorney Roger Moyer, Acting Chair ATTEST: ________________________________ Mike Sear, Deputy City Clerk 92 Exhibit A Minor PD Amendment Detailed Review Approval Review Criteria Staff Findings Historic Preservation Commission 420 East Durant Avenue – Minor PD Amendment – Review Criteria Page 1 of 6 26.445.110.E Minor Amendment to a Detailed Review approval. An amendment found by the Community Development Director consistent with a Project Review approval and to be generally consistent with the allowances and limitations of a Detailed Review approval, or which otherwise represents an insubstantial change, but which does not meet the established thresholds for an insubstantial amendment, may be approved, approved with conditions or denied by the Planning and Zoning Commission or the Historic Preservation Commission as applicable, pursuant to 26.445.040(b)(3) - Step Three. 26.445.070 Detailed Review Standards Detailed Review shall focus on the comprehensive evaluation of the specific aspects of the development, including utility placement, and architectural materials. In the review of a development application for Detailed Review, the Planning and Zoning Commission, or the Historic Preservation Commission as applicable, shall consider the following: A. Compliance with Project Review Approval. The proposed development, including all dimensions and uses, is consistent with the Project Review approval and adequately addresses conditions on the approval and direction received during the Project Review. Staff Finding: The applicant proposes to install three (3) overhead bus chargers at the Rubey Park Transit Center. The applicant proposes to memorialize the locations of all the overhead charger locations on site but endeavors to construct one (1) currently. The Rubey Park Transit Center was developed in 1987 and was utilized as an Essential Public Facility. The Planned Development was amended in 2014 and was subject to several site approvals (P&Z Resolution No. 11, Series of 2014, Council Ordinance No. 22, Series of 2014, HPC Resolution No. 5, Series of 2014, and HPC Resolution No. 29, Series of 2014). The proposed bus chargers are consistent with the use on site as a public transit facility The chargers are also consistent with the dimensional limitations set forth in the Proj ect Review Approvals. The bus chargers are considered accessory improvements and not part of any building. Installing the chargers has no impact on any aspects associated with Project Review Approvals (floor area, parking, building mass, and other associated requirements). At the conclusion of the proposed changes, the use and character of the project will remain the same. Staff finds this criterion to be met. B. Growth Management. The proposed development has received all required GMQS allotments, or is concurrently seeking allotments. 93 Exhibit A Minor PD Amendment Detailed Review Approval Review Criteria Staff Findings Historic Preservation Commission 420 East Durant Avenue – Minor PD Amendment – Review Criteria Page 2 of 6 Staff Finding: No GMQS allotments are required for this application as the proposed improvements have no bearing on Floor Area . Staff finds this criterion not applicable. C. Site Planning and Landscape Architecture. The site plan is compatible with the context and visual character of the area. In meeting this standard, the following criteria shall be used: (1) The landscape plan exhibits a well -designed treatment of exterior spaces, preserves existing significant vegetation, and provides an ample quantity and variety of ornamental plant species suitable for the Aspen area climate. Vegetation removal, protection, and restoration plans shall be acceptable to the Director of Parks and Open Space. Staff Finding: The applicant proposes changes to the landscaping along the rain garden on site to accommodate the mechanical equipment for the overhead bus chargers. The overhead bus chargers require upgrades to the existing electrical transformers, switchgear, and the installation of an electrical distribution panel. The applicant has worked extensively with the Parks Department on the required plantings as well as t he Community Development Department on the design and screening for the mechanical equipment in the landscaped area. Staff finds this criterion to be met. (2) Buildings and site grading provide simple, at -grade entrances and minimize extensive grade change s along building exteriors. The project meets or exceeds the requirements of the Americans with Disabilities Act and applicable requirements for emergency, maintenance, and service vehicle access. Adequate snow storage is accommodated. Staff Finding: The chargers do not require additional site grading or the construction of new buildings. The location of the chargers will new impact/reduce vehicular rights -of- way and will not impede any sidewalks or ADA pathways. Staff finds this criterion not applicable. (3) Energy efficiency or production features are integrated into the landscape in a manner that enhances the site. Staff Finding: The overhead chargers and associated utility equipment are located adjacent to the alleyway and are set away from the street and transit building. Plantings are proposed to shield the equipment to the extent practicable. The applicant states that this work will be completed in accordance with the “EV Public Charging Infrastructure Masterplan.” The EV Public Charging Masterplan provides action items and responsibility outlines for the expansion and management of municipally owned and operated EV charging infrastructure for the next five years: 2021 through 2026. Staff finds this criterion to be met. 94 Exhibit A Minor PD Amendment Detailed Review Approval Review Criteria Staff Findings Historic Preservation Commission 420 East Durant Avenue – Minor PD Amendment – Review Criteria Page 3 of 6 (4) All site lighting is proposed so as to prevent direct glare or hazardous interference of any kind to adjoining streets or lands. All exterior lighting shall comply with the City's outdoor lighting standards. Staff Finding: The applicant proposes no new exterior site lighting; however, there will be a single LED beacon red and green light that is integral to the overhead charger and faces the bus drivers. This beacon notifies the drivers of the charged status of the bus. The lights shall comply with Land Use Code Section 26.575.150 Outdoor Lighting. No uplighting will be approved. Staff finds this criterion to be met. (5) Site drainage is accommod ated for the proposed development in compliance with Title 29—Engineering Design Standards and shall not negatively impact surrounding properties. Staff Finding: The applicant states that the proposed changes do not negatively affect site drainage. The existing stormwater system has capacity to treat the additional impervious area. The site drainage shall comply with Title 29-Engineering Design Standards. Staff finds this criterion to be met. D. Design Standards and Architecture. The proposed architectural details emphasize quality construction and design characteristics. In meeting this standard, the following criteria shall be used: (1) The project architecture provides for visual interest and incorporates present - day details and use of materials respectful of the community's past without attempting to mimic history. Staff Finding: No new architectural features are proposed. The charging arms are standalone structures and are modern in design. The chargers measure eighteen feet two inches (18’ 2”) from the finished grade on site and approximately sixteen feet (16’) across from the point of attachment to the end of the charging arm. The charging arms are prefabricated and designed to work to charge electric buses. Staff finds this criterion not applicable. (2) Exterior materials are of a high quality, durability, and comply with applicable design standards, including those outlined in Chapter 26.410, Residential Design Standards, Chapter 26.412 , Commercial Design Standards, and Chapter 26.415, Historic Preservation. Staff Finding: The proposed exterior materials of a high quality, durability, and comply with all applicable commercial design standards and Historic Preservation standards. Staff finds this criterion to be met. 95 Exhibit A Minor PD Amendment Detailed Review Approval Review Criteria Staff Findings Historic Preservation Commission 420 East Durant Avenue – Minor PD Amendment – Review Criteria Page 4 of 6 (3) Building entrances are sited or designed to minimize icing and snow shedding effects. Staff Finding: Staff finds this criterion not applicable. (4) Energy efficiency or production features are integrated into structures in a manner that enhances the architecture. Staff Finding: The proposed charging infrastructure is separate from any existing structures. The energy efficiency or production features shall be integrated into the charging arms in a manner that will enhance the structure. The chargers are located away from the existing building on site adjacent to the alleyway. The Rubey Park Transit Center does not have alley access, so all sides of the building are prominent. Staff believes that integrating these charging stations into the existing building would produce sub -optimal conditions. Staff finds this criterion to be met. (5) All structure lighting is pro posed so as to prevent direct glare or hazardous interference of any kind to adjoining streets or lands. All exterior lighting shall comply with the City's outdoor lighting standards. Staff Finding: The structure lighting (beacons) is proposed to prevent direct glare or hazardous interference of any kind to adjoining streets or lands. The lighting shall comply with the City’s outdoor lighting standards. Staff finds this criterion to be met. E. Common Parks, Open Space, Recreation Areas, or Facilities. If the proposed development includes common parks, open space, recreation areas, or common facilities, a proportionate, undivided interest is deeded in perpetuity to each lot or dwelling unit owner within the Planned Development. An adequate assurance through a Development Agreement for the permanent care and maintenance of open spaces, recreation areas, and shared facilities together with a prohibition against future development is required. Staff Finding: Staff finds this criterion not applicable. F. Pedestrian, bicycle & transit facilities. The development improves pedestrian, bicycle, and transit facilities. These facilities and improvements shall be prioritized over vehicular facilities and improvements. Any new vehicular access points minimize impacts on existing pedestrian, bicycle and transit facilities. Any specific designs, mitigation techniques, and implementation timelines as required during Project Review comply with the applicable requirements of the Project Review and as otherwise required in the Land Use Code. These plans shall provide sufficient detail to determine if the design or mitigation concept complies 96 Exhibit A Minor PD Amendment Detailed Review Approval Review Criteria Staff Findings Historic Preservation Commission 420 East Durant Avenue – Minor PD Amendment – Review Criteria Page 5 of 6 with the intent of the requirements and to determine any required cost estimating for surety requirements, but do not need to be detailed construction documents. Staff Finding: The proposed changes are designed to improve the existing transit on site. The chargers will effectively continue the City’s goal of electrifying our transit. The overhead bus chargers will allow for greater utilizati on of the existing electric bus fleet. The chargers can significantly top up a battery in the 10–15-minute layover times that RFTA typically operates at. The chargers operate fast enough that the buses will not need to be rotated out of service and down to the bus barn/fuel station at the AABC during the day to charge. Staff finds this criterion to be met. G. Engineering Design Standards. There has been accurate identification of engineering design and mitigation techniques necessary for development of the proposed subdivision to comply with the applicable requirements of Municipal Code Title 29—Engineering Design Standards and the City of Aspen Urban Runoff Management Plan (URMP). Any specific designs, mitigation techniques, and implementation timelines as required during Project Review comply with the applicable requirements of Municipal Code Title 29—Engineering Design Standards and the City of Aspen Urban Runoff Management Plan (URMP). These plans shall provide sufficient detail to determine if the design or mitigation concept complies with the intent of the requirements, but do not need to be detailed construction documents. Staff Finding: The project shall comply with all Engineering Design Standards and the City of Aspen Urban Runoff Management Plan (URMP). The Engineering Department will be using all Best Management Practices (BMPs) in the design an d construction of the upgraded facilities. Staff finds this criterion to be met. H. Public Infrastructure and Facilities. The proposed Planned Development shall upgrade public infrastructure and facilities necessary to serve the project. Improvements shall be at the sole costs of the developer. Any specific designs, mitigation techniques, and implementation timelines as required during Project Review comply with the applicable requirements of Municipal Code Title 29—Engineering Design Standards and the City of Aspen Urban Runoff Management Plan (URMP). These plans shall provide sufficient detail to determine if the design or mitigation concept complies with the intent of the requirements, but do not need to be detailed construction documents. Staff Finding: The applicant states that the project will upgrade all electric infrastructure necessary to support the overhead electric bus chargers. All utility requirements shall 97 Exhibit A Minor PD Amendment Detailed Review Approval Review Criteria Staff Findings Historic Preservation Commission 420 East Durant Avenue – Minor PD Amendment – Review Criteria Page 6 of 6 meet the Engineering Design Standards and the URMP. Staff finds this criterion to be met. I. Phasing of development plan. If phasing of the development plan is proposed, each phase shall be designed to functio n as a complete development and shall not be reliant on subsequent phases. Phasing shall insulate, to the extent practical, occupants of initial phases from the construction of later phases. All necessary or proportionate improvements to public facilities, payment of impact fees and fees -in-lieu, construction of any facilities to be used jointly by residents of the Planned Development, construction of any required affordable housing, and any mitigation measures shall be completed concurrent or prior to the respective impacts associated with the phase. Staff Finding: Phasing is requested for this application. The applicants are receiving funding for the completion of this first phase by the Colorado Department of Transportation (CDOT). The applicant wishes to memorialize the locations of all three planned bus chargers; however, they wish to install only one charger in the near term. Each phase of the project is self-sufficient, and each charger can operate independently of the others. Staff finds this criterion to be met. 98 Exhibit B Minor Development Commercial Design Review Review Criteria Staff Findings Historic Preservation Commission 420 East Durant Avenue – Commercial Design Review – Review Criteria Page 1 of 4 26.412.060. Commercial Design: Review Criteria. An application for commercial design review may be approved, approved with conditions, or denied based on conformance with the following criteria: A. Guidelines and Standards 1. The Commercial, Lodging, and Historic District Design Standards and Guidelines are met as determined by the appropriate Commission . The Standards and Guidelines include design review criteria that are to be used to determine whether the application is appropriate. 2. All applicable standards in the Commercial, Lodging and Historic District Design Standards and Guidelines shall be met unless granted a Variation pursuant to S ection 26.412.040.D, Variations. For conciseness, staff has included only the relevant Commercial Design Guidelines and Standards: General – Materials and Details: 1.1 (Standard) All projects shall provide a context study. • This study should include the relationship to adjacent structures and streets through photographs, streetscape elevations, historic maps, etc. Staff Findings: Rubey Park Transit Center (420 East Durant Avenue) is an Essential Public Facility located in the Commercial Core Historic District. The property is not historically landmarked and contains no historically designated buildings. The property is bordered on the west by Wagner Park Rugby Stadium and to the north is the pedestrian mall. The buildings located to the north and east of Rubey Park Transit Station are non-contributing. The application includes maps and renderings showing the property surroundings. The transit center itself is unique in the commercial core and does not significantly reflect the context, other than that the primary building nods to downtown development in terms of materials and fenestration. It is worth acknowledging the need to balance the Commercial Design Standards with evolving community goals (i.e., the EV Public Charing Infrastructure Masterplan), and changes in technology. The charging stations measure eighteen feet in height, which is taller than most mechanical/utility equipment typically seen in Aspen, but lower than maximum building height. Community Development, Engineering, Parks and RFTA have worked together to find the least visually impactful location for the charging stations and associated equipment, addressing both the Commercial Design Review Criteria and the “EV Public Charging Infrastructure Masterplan” approved by City Council in 2021. The applicant has provided elevations, as well as conceptual drawings to convey the extent of the proposed work. Staff finds this criterion to be met. 99 Exhibit B Minor Development Commercial Design Review Review Criteria Staff Findings Historic Preservation Commission 420 East Durant Avenue – Commercial Design Review – Review Criteria Page 2 of 4 1.3 (Guideline) Landscape elements (both hardscape and softscape) should complement the surrounding context, support the street scene, and enhance the architecture of the building. • This applies to landscape located both on-site and in the public right of way. • High quality and durable materials should be used. • Early in the design process, consider stormwater best management practices as an integral part of the landscape design process. Staff Findings: The applicant proposes a reconfiguration of the landscaping in the rain garden surrounding the new charging arms and associated mechanical equipment. This will assist to shield the charging arm mechanical equipment to the extent practicable. The applicant has thoroughly considered the stormwater implications with this project. The rain garden will continue to be utilized in the existing location. The applicant states that the existing stormwater system can manage the increased load of the additional impervious area. Staff finds this criterion to be met. 1.22 (Standard) Complete and accurate identification of materials is required. • Provide drawings that identify the palette of materials, specifications for the materials, and location on the proposed building as part of the application. • Physical material samples shall be presented to the review body. An onsite mock- up prior to installation may be required. Staff Findings: Description of proposed material and location are provided in the application. All new development is clad in painted or anodized metal, standard materials in the district. Staff finds this criterion to be met. 1.23 (Standard) Building materials shall have these features: • Convey the quality and range of materials found in the current block context or seen historically in the Character Area. • Convey pedestrian scale. • Enhance visual interest through texture, application, and/or dimension. • Be non-reflective. Shiny or glossy materials are not appropriate as a primary material. • Have proven durability and weathering characteristics within Aspen’s climate. • A material with an integral color shall be a neutral color. Some variation is allowed for secondary materials. 100 Exhibit B Minor Development Commercial Design Review Review Criteria Staff Findings Historic Preservation Commission 420 East Durant Avenue – Commercial Design Review – Review Criteria Page 3 of 4 Staff Findings: Painted and anodized metal are found on new construction throughout the district and have shown proven durability. While the materials may have a gloss finish for durability, the materials shall be non- reflective to blend in with the surroundings. Although the bus charging stations will be eighteen feet tall, the charging arm height is required to fit over the buses to charge. Staff believes that these charging arms and associated utilities and mechanical equipment will represent a minimal change to the character of this site and context of this block. HPC may include a condition requesting review of material samples if desired. Staff finds this criterion to be met. Figure 1: Charging arm & power cabinet materials/color 1.31 (Guideline) Minimize the visual impacts of utility connections and service boxes. • Group and discreetly locate these features. • Use screening and materials that complement the architecture. Staff Findings: The applicant proposes grouping the utility and service boxes for each of the three electric charging stations. The applicant proposes screening with vegetation to the extent practicable. The rain garden vegetation will closely resemble what is there today. Staff finds this criterion to be met. 1.32 (Standard) Transformer location and size are dictated by City and utility company standards and codes. • Place a transformer on an alley where possible. • Provide screening for any non-alley location. Staff Findings: The applicant proposes new transformer locations for the site to accommodate the requirements for the utilities. Each charging station will require a transformer, three power cabinets, switchgear, and the charging arms. The transformer is located adjacent to the alley on the north side of the property. The applicant proposes to screen the transformer and other mechanical equipment to the extent practicable on this site. Staff finds this criterion to be met. 101 Exhibit B Minor Development Commercial Design Review Review Criteria Staff Findings Historic Preservation Commission 420 East Durant Avenue – Commercial Design Review – Review Criteria Page 4 of 4 Figure 2: Transformer, switchgear, power cabinet, and charging arm locations. Commercial Core Historic District 2.14 (Guideline) Architectural details should reinforce historic context and meet at least two of the following qualities. • Color or finish traditionally found downtown. • Texture to create visual interest, especially for larger buildings. • Traditional material: Brick, stone, metal and wood. • Traditional application: for example, a running bond for masonry. Staff Findings: The overall context of this block is park and contemporary infill. The property is currently developed as a public transit hub operated by the Roaring Fork Transportation Authority. The charging station charging arm is prefabricated. The exterior material is metal, a traditional material in a finish common to the neighborhood. The charging arms provide a modern aesthetic and draw visual interest to the overall electrification of Aspen’s bus fleet. The mechanical equipment will be metal and is indicated to be painted green, other than the transformer, which is illegal to paint. Staff finds this criterion to be met. 102 103 Figure 1: Proposed Rubey Park Site Plan 104 “highly visible [locations] (to incentivize and educate others),” Figure 2: Landscape Plan 105 Figure 3: Landscape Plantings Rendering 106 Attachments: 1. Review Criteria 2. Application Form 3. HOA Form 4. Fee Agreement 5. Authorization to Represent & Proof of Ownership 6. Pre-App Summary 7. Plan Sets Figure 4: Landscape Plantings Rendering 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 May 25, 2023 Trish Aragon City Engineer City of Aspen 427 Rio Grande Place Aspen, CO 81611 Email: trish.aragon@aspen.gov Phone: 970.309.6344 Delivery Method: Email to trish.aragon@aspen.gov RE: NOTICE TO PROCEED WITH "HIGH PRIORITY" DESIGNATION FOR RUBEY PARK OVERHEAD BUS CHARGER PROJECT Dear Ms. Aragon, I hope this letter finds you well. Based on the attached City of Aspen internal construction projects policy, I am writing to initiate the "High Priority" designation for the Rubey Park Overhead Bus Charger Project. This project holds significant importance as it will enhance the efficiency and sustainability of public transportation in Aspen. The project qualifies as a “High Priority” per the City of Aspen Internal Construction Project Policy based on the following: 1. Requires coordination with other another governmental entity or district necessitating higher review priority 2. Requires upgrade or re-route of utilities 3. Provides the ability to significantly shorten project work schedule 4. Reduces project cost as a whole, over the long run The Rubey Park Overhead Bus Charger Project has been meticulously planned and prepared, with the involvement of various departments within the City of Aspen. The collaboration among departments such as Transportation, Engineering, Utilities, and Parks has been instrumental in ensuring the successful implementation of this project. The need for expedited review and approval arises from the project's potential to provide immediate benefits to the community and grant funding deadline of December 31, 2023. To maintain the desired timeline, it is crucial that all relevant departments promptly review and provide their input on the project. We aim to receive the initial review comments within six weeks of the completed application submittal, which is scheduled for May 31, 2023. This will allow us to proceed with the issuance of necessary permits and commence construction during the Fall of 2023. Given the significance of this project for the City of Aspen and its commitment to sustainable transportation solutions, it is imperative that we streamline coordination with external government agencies as well. The "High Priority" designation will aid in facilitating effective communication and expediting the necessary approvals from such agencies. 115 The Rubey Park Overhead Bus Charger Project involves crucial infrastructure upgrades that will hasten the transition to a clean electric public transportation system in Aspen. It is vital that we adhere to the planned timeline to minimize disruptions to the community and ensure timely completion of the project. Your support and collaboration in prioritizing this project will contribute significantly to its success. If you have any questions or require additional information, please do not hesitate to contact me. I look forward to your continued support and cooperation in making the Rubey Park Overhead Bus Charger Project a remarkable achievement for the City of Aspen. Thank you for your attention to this matter. Sincerely, Sara Ott City Manger City of Aspen 427 Rio Grande Place Aspen, CO 81611 CC: Scott Miller, Public Works Director, scott.miller@aspen.govcityofaspen.com Encl: City of Aspen Internal Construction Projects Policy (Attached) 116 Page | 1 PRE-APPLICATION CONFERENCE SUMMARY DATE: July 14, 2022 PLANNER: Jeffrey Barnhill | jeffrey.barnhill@aspen.gov | 970.429.2752 PROJECT NAME AND ADDRESS: Rubey Park Transit Center | 420 E. Durant Ave PARCEL ID# 2737-182-21-851 REPRESENTATIVE: Scott Wenning | Engineering | Scott.Wenning@aspen.gov DESCRIPTION: The subject property is in the Public (PUB) zone district, within the Historic District, and includes a Planned Development Overlay. The property is improved with a public building that serves as the Rubey Park Transit Center. The facility was redeveloped around 2014 and was subject to several reviews, which were approved via: • P&Z Resolution No. 11, Series of 2014 • Ordinance No. 22, Series of 2014 • HPC Resolution No. 5, Series of 2014 • HPC Resolution No. 29, Series of 2014 The resulting Final Plat of the Rubey Park Transit Center PD (Reception No. 619699) memorializes existing buildings and improvements on the property. The applicant is interested in amending the PD to accommodate overhead electric bus chargers. The Roaring Fork Transportation Authority (RFTA) is currently updating its bus fleet and many of the new buses are 100 percent electric. These chargers are intended to quickly top-off a battery charge and minimize delay. While the location(s) and number of chargers is still being contemplated, generally, the plan will require upgrades to existing electrical transformers and switchgear and the installation of an electrical distribution panel, and mechanical screening. The current plan is to install 1 charger initially, with 2 more at later stages, for a total of 3 electric chargers. Staff requires the applicant propose all locations these may be installed even if they are not being built at this stage. The final scope of this project exceeds the authority of administrative review criteria, the application is subject to review by the Historic Preservation Commission and then potentially call-up by City Council. The following reviews are triggered as part of this project. ❖ Minor Amendment to a Planned Development Detailed Review Approval ❖ Commercial Design Review – Review by Historic Preservation Commission ❖ Minor Historic Preservation Development Review RELEVANT LAND USE CODE SECTIONS: Section Number Section Title 26.304 Common Development Review Procedures 26.412.030 Commercial Design- Review by Historic Preservation Commission 26.415.070.c Certificate of Appropriateness for a Minor Development 117 Page | 2 26.445.070 Planned Development – Detailed Review Standards 26.445.110.e Planned Development – Minor Amendment to a Detailed Review Approval For your convenience – links to the Land Use Application, and the Land Use Code are provided below: Land Use Application | Land Use Code REVIEW BY: +Community Development staff for complete application & content. +Engineering Department for content. +Parks Department for content. +Historic Preservation Commission for review and approval for minor development review and commercial design review. +City Council for potential call-up of Commercial Design Review PUBLIC HEARING: Yes, Historic Preservation Commission PLANNING FEES: $4,550 deposit for 14 hours of staff time (additional or less hours will be billed or refunded at a rate of $325 per hour) REFERRAL FEES: Engineering- $325 for one hour of review time. (additional or less hours will be billed or refunded at a rate of $325 per hour) Parks - $975 flat fee TOTAL DEPOSIT: $5,850. Notwithstanding the planning review fee schedule, the Community Development Director shall waive planning review fees for General Fund Departments of the City of Aspen consistent with City policy. APPLICATION CHECKLIST – PLEASE EMAIL APPLICATION TO: JEFFREY.BARNHILL@ASPEN.GOV  Completed Land Use Application and signed Fee Agreement.  Pre-application Conference Summary (this document).  Applicant’s name, address and phone number, within a letter signed by the applicant stating the name, address and phone number of the representative authorized to act on behalf of the applicant  Street address and legal description of the parcel on which d evelopment is proposed to occur, consisting of a current (no older than 6 months) certificate from a title insurance company, an ownership and encumbrance report, or attorney licensed to practice in the State of Colorado, listing the names of all owners of the property, and all mortgages, judgments, liens, easements, contracts and agreements affecting the parcel, and demonstrating the owner’s right to apply for the Development Application. The purpose of this requirement is to show that the Applicant has the authority to apply for a Land Use Case.  A written description of the proposal and an explanation in written, graphic, or model form of how the proposed development complies with the review standards relevant to the development application. (Includes 26.445.070 Detailed Review Standards, 26.415.070.c1 Certificate of appropriateness for a minor development, and 26.412.060 Commercial Design Review Criteria)  HOA Compliance form (Attached to Application) 118 Page | 3  Scaled site plan, elevations, and/or drawings of the proposed work and its relationship to the designated historic buildings, structures, sites and features within its vicinity.  An accurate representation of materials and finishes to be used in the development.  Photographs, renderings, and other exhibits, as needed, to accurately depict location, extent and design of proposed work. Once the copy is deemed complete by staff, the following items will then need to be submitted:  Total fee for review of the application. Disclaimer: The foregoing summary is advisory in nature only and is not binding on the City. The summary is based on current zoning, which is subject to change in the future, and upon factual representations that may or may not be accurate. The summary does not create a legal or vested right. 119 PROPOSED PLANTING MODIFICATIONS | PLAN + VIEW DIAGRAM RUBEY PARK ELECTRIC BUS CHARGING STATION | MAY 2023 2’ N 4’8’0 3 1 2 26.01 26.02 26.03 26.04 BUS TRANSIT DRIVE LANE BLOCK 90 ALLE Y 3’ VAULT CLEARANCE ZONE. NO PLANTINGS ABOVE 2’ HT. PROPOSED PLANTING MODIFICATIONS | PLAN + VIEW DIA RUBEY PARK ELECTRIC BUS CHARGING STATION | M 2’4’8’0 3 1 2 26.01 26.02 26.03 26.04 BUS TRANSIT DRIVE LANE BLOCK 90 ALLE Y 3’ VAULT CLEARANCE ZONE. NO PLANTINGS ABOVE 2’ HT. 120 PROPOSED PLANTING MODIFICATIONS | PLAN + VIEW DIA RUBEY PARK ELECTRIC BUS CHARGING STATION | M 2’4’8’0 3 1 2 26.01 26.02 26.03 26.04 BUS TRANSIT DRIVE LANE BLOCK 90 ALLE Y 3’ VAULT CLEARANCE ZONE. NO PLANTINGS ABOVE 2’ HT. 121 PROPOSED PLANTING MODIFICATIONS | PLAN + VIEW DIA RUBEY PARK ELECTRIC BUS CHARGING STATION | M 2’4’8’0 3 1 2 26.01 26.02 26.03 26.04 BUS TRANSIT DRIVE LANE BLOCK 90 ALLE Y 3’ VAULT CLEARANCE ZONE. NO PLANTINGS ABOVE 2’ HT. 122 PROPOSED PLANTING MODIFICATIONS | PLAN + VIEW DIA RUBEY PARK ELECTRIC BUS CHARGING STATION | M 2’4’8’0 3 1 2 26.01 26.02 26.03 26.04 BUS TRANSIT DRIVE LANE BLOCK 90 ALLE Y 3’ VAULT CLEARANCE ZONE. NO PLANTINGS ABOVE 2’ HT. 123 VICINITY MAP DRAWING INDEX PROJECT DIRECTORY LOCATION MAP ROARING FORK TRANSIT AUTHORITY RUBEY PARK ELECTRIC CHARGER ASPEN, COLORADO 81611 30% DESIGN DOCUMENTS R SEH Project Checked By Drawn By Project Status Issue Date This drawing is an instrument of service and shall remain the property of Short Elliott Hendrickson, Inc. (SEH). This drawing, concepts and ideas contained herein shall not be used, reproduced, revised, or retained without the express written approval of SEH. Submission or distribution of this drawing to meet official or regulatory requirements or for purposes in connection with the project is not be construed as publication in derogation of any of the rights of SEH. N O T FO R C O N S TR U C TIO N Short Elliott Hendrickson, Inc.All Rights ReservedCOPYRIGHT © 2023PROJECT OWNER ROARING FORK TRANSPORTATION AUTHORITY 0051 SEVICE CENTER DRIVE ASPEN, COLORADO 81611 5/3/2023 12:27:10 PMCOVER SHEETRUBEY PARK ELECTRIC CHARGERASPEN, COLORADO81611165526 MtN & AJ MtNROARING FORK TRANSIT AUTHORITY30% DESIGN DOCUMENTS 05/03/2023 G001 ARCHITECTURE A001 GENERAL INFORMATION AND ABBREVIATIONS A071 OVERALL DEMOLITION PLAN A111 OVERALL PLAN A400 ENLARGED PLANS A401 ENLARGED PLANS A402 ENLARGED SECTIONS A403 ENLARGED SECTIONS CIVIL C001 CDOT STANDARD PLAN LIST C100 DEMOLITION PLAN C200 SITE PLAN C300 UTILITY PLAN C400 CIVIL DETAILS C401 CIVIL DETAILS ELECTRICAL E-1.00 ELECTRICAL LEGEND, SCHEDULES AND DETAILS E-2.00 ELECTRICAL ONE LINE DIAGRAM E-3.01 ELECTRICAL GROUND LEVEL PLAN GENERAL G001 COVER SHEET LANDSCAPE L-1 PLANTING PLAN L-2 PLANTING DETAILS & NOTES OWNER ARCHITECT / CIVIL / STRUCTURAL ROARING FORK TRANSPORTATION AUTHORITY 0051 SEVICE CENTER DRIVE ASPEN, COLORADO 81611 SHORT ELLIOTT HENDRICKSON, INC. 2000 SOUTH COLORADO BOULEVARD TOWER ONE, SUITE 6000 DENVER, COLORADO 80222 720.540.6800 1 1 PROJECT LOCATION REVISION SCHEDULE REV. # DESCRIPTION DATE ELECTRICAL ENGINEER CMO CONSULTING ENGINEERS, LLC 11646 SUN BEAR TRAIL GOLDEN, COLORADO 80403 303.875.4037 DHM DESIGN LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURE 311 MAIN STREET CARBONDALE, CO 81623 970.963.6520 LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT 124 R SEH Project Checked By Drawn By Project Status Issue Date This drawing is an instrument of service and shall remain the property of Short Elliott Hendrickson, Inc. (SEH). This drawing, concepts and ideas contained herein shall not be used, reproduced, revised, or retained without the express written approval of SEH. Submission or distribution of this drawing to meet official or regulatory requirements or for purposes in connection with the project is not be construed as publication in derogation of any of the rights of SEH. NOT F O R CONST R U CTI O N Short Elliott Hendrickson, Inc.All Rights ReservedCOPYRIGHT © 2023PROJECT OWNER ROARING FORK TRANSPORTATION AUTHORITY 51 SERVICE CENTER DRIVE ASPEN, COLORADO 81611 \\sehinc.com\panzura\pzprojects\PT\R\ROFTA\165526\99 Civil\5-final-dsgn\51-drawings\Plansheets\CDs\165526 Details.dwg 5/1/2023 3:41:19 PMRUBEY PARK ELECTRIC CHARGERASPEN, COLORADO81611165526 TN JJROARING FORK TRANSIT AUTHORITY30% DESIGN DOCUMENTS 05/03/2023 REVISION SCHEDULE REV. # DESCRIPTION DATE C001 CDOT STANDARD PLANS LIST 125 REMOVAL OF TREE REMOVAL OF TREE SAW CUT AND REMOVAL OF CONCRETE PAVEMENT REMOVAL OF CURB AND GUTTER 16.0'8.0' BEGIN REMOVAL AT START OF CURB RADIUS END CURB REMOVAL 3.2' FROM CURB RADIUS 2.0' RESET BIO-RETENTION INLET FILTER (TYP., x3) 5.1' REMOVAL OF CURB AND GUTTER 14.2' 140.94° SAW CUT AND REMOVAL OF ASPHALT MAT 13.7'28.7' 5.1' 28.7' 12.6' 5.0' REMOVAL OF CURB AND GUTTER REMOVAL OF WALL EXISTING ELECTRIC VAULT BLOCK 90 ALLEY BUS TRANSIT DRIVE LANE PARK PLACE CONDOMINIUMS 6.6'5.3' MILL ASPHALT MAT. SEE T PATCH DETAIL SHEET C400 REMOVAL OF EXISTING 4" PERFORATED UNDERDRAIN PIPE (LOCATION APPROXIMATE) REMOVE VEGETATION, GROWING MEDIA, AGGREGATE, GEOTEXTILE, AND GEOMEMBRANE RESET SIGN PROTECT EXISTING TREE REMOVAL OF RISER 5.0' PROTECT EXISTING RISER END UNDERDRAIN REMOVAL 3.0' FROM BIO-RETENTION REMOVAL LIMITS R SEH Project Checked By Drawn By Project Status Issue Date This drawing is an instrument of service and shall remain the property of Short Elliott Hendrickson, Inc. (SEH). This drawing, concepts and ideas contained herein shall not be used, reproduced, revised, or retained without the express written approval of SEH. Submission or distribution of this drawing to meet official or regulatory requirements or for purposes in connection with the project is not be construed as publication in derogation of any of the rights of SEH. NOT F O R CONST R U CTI O N Short Elliott Hendrickson, Inc.All Rights ReservedCOPYRIGHT © 2023PROJECT OWNER ROARING FORK TRANSPORTATION AUTHORITY 51 SERVICE CENTER DRIVE ASPEN, COLORADO 81611 \\sehinc.com\panzura\pzprojects\PT\R\ROFTA\165526\99 Civil\5-final-dsgn\51-drawings\Plansheets\CDs\165526 Demo Plan.dwg 5/1/2023 3:41:32 PMRUBEY PARK ELECTRIC CHARGERASPEN, COLORADO81611165526 TN JJROARING FORK TRANSIT AUTHORITY30% DESIGN DOCUMENTS 05/03/2023 REVISION SCHEDULE REV. # DESCRIPTION DATE 0 feetscale 5 105 2.5 C100 DEMOLITION PLAN SITE DEMOLITION NOTES 1. A FIELD SURVEY WAS NOT PERFORMED AS A PART OF THIS PROJECT. ALL LOCATIONS SHOWN ARE APPROXIMATE BASED ON RECORD DRAWINGS. CONTRACTOR SHALL CONSTRUCT SITE FEATURES USING EXISTING FEATURES AS REFERENCE POINTS. REFER TO PLAN SHEET DIMENSIONS AND CALLOUTS FOR LOCATION INFORMATION. 2. THE LOCATIONS OF UNDERGROUND UTILITIES HAVE BEEN PLOTTED BASED ON UTILITY MAPS, LOCATES OR OTHER INFORMATION PROVIDED BY UTILITY COMPANIES AND ACTUAL FIELD LOCATIONS IN SOME INSTANCES. THESE UTILITIES, AS SHOWN MAY NOT REPRESENT ACTUAL FIELD CONDITIONS. IT IS THE RESPONSIBILITY OF THE CONTRACTOR TO CONTACT ALL UTILITY COMPANIES FOR FIELD LOCATION OF UTILITIES PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION. 3. ALL UTILITIES, BOTH UNDERGROUND AND OVERHEAD, SHALL BE MAINTAINED IN CONTINUOUS SERVICE THROUGHOUT THE ENTIRE CONSTRUCTION PERIOD. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE AND LIABLE FOR ANY DAMAGES TO, OR INTERRUPTION OF, SERVICES CAUSED BY THE CONSTRUCTION. 4. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL CONTAIN HIS CONSTRUCTION OPERATIONS TO THE SITE BOUNDARIES AND SPECIFIED RIGHT OF WAY AS DELINEATED BY THE LIMITS OF DISTURBANCE BOUNDARY ILLUSTRATED. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL NOT OPERATE OUTSIDE THIS AREA WITHOUT THE PRIOR EXPRESSED CONSENT OF THE OWNER OR DEVELOPMENT REPRESENTATIVES. 5. CONTRACTOR TO COORDINATE ALL UTILITY LINEWORK WITH THE RESPECTIVE UTILITY COMPANIES PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION. ALL UTILITY WORK SHALL BE IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE RULES AND REGULATIONS OF THE UTILITY PROVIDER. 6. ALTHOUGH NOT SHOWN/LOCATED ON THE RECORD PLANS, IT IS ASSUMED THAT EXISTING ELECTRIC & IRRIGATION SERVICE LINES ARE PRESENT THROUGHOUT THE SUBJECT PROPERTY. EROSION CONTROL NOTES 1. CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FOR OBTAINING A LOCATION FOR PROJECT STAGING AND RELATED EROSION CONTROL MEASURES. 2. CONTRACTOR TO DIVERT SURFACE DRAINAGE AROUND PROJECT AREA USING GRAVEL BAGS OR SIMILAR METHODS. 3. CONTRACTOR MUST UTILIZE "BEST MANAGEMENT PRACTICES" (BMP), TO CONTROL EROSION AND SEDIMENTATION DURING CONSTRUCTION, TO INCLUDE THE INSTALLATION OF INLET PROTECTION AROUND THE NEAREST DOWNSTREAM RECEIVING INLET LOCATED WITHIN THE CITY'S ROW. 4. DUST CAUSED BY EXCAVATION, TOPSOIL REMOVAL OPERATIONS, OR ROAD BASE PLACEMENT SHALL BE CONTROLLED BY THE CONTRACTOR AT HIS EXPENSE. THE ENGINEER OR CITY MAY REQUIRE THE CONTRACTOR AT ANY TIME TO DISCONTINUE CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITIES UNTIL DUST CONDITIONS ARE REDUCED TO THE CITY'S SATISFACTION. 5. THE CONTRACTOR WILL BE REQUIRED TO FURNISH AND APPLY A DUST PALLIATIVE ON THE SITE. DUST PALLIATIVE MAY CONSIST OF WATER OR A NON-POLLUTING SOLUTION. SPREADING OF WATER OR WATER MIXTURE SHALL BE DONE WITH ACCEPTABLE SPRINKLING EQUIPMENT. ALL DUST CONTROL SHALL EXTEND BEYOND THE CONSTRUCTION AREA PROPER TO THE SIDE STREETS ENTERING AND EXITING THE PROJECT, WHERE MUD AND DIRT FROM CONSTRUCTION EQUIPMENT, AS WELL AS LOCAL TRAFFIC, MAY GET ONTO THE SIDE STREETS. CLEANUP OF THESE AREAS WILL BE REQUIRED AS NECESSARY OR AS DIRECTED BY THE CITY/OWNER/ENGINEER AT THE CONTRACTORS EXPENSE. 6. MAINTENANCE OF PROPER DRAINAGE AND CLEANING TEMPORARY SEDIMENT CONTAINMENT DURING THE PROGRESS OF THE CONTRACT IS ESSENTIAL. ANY DAMAGE DUE TO IMPROPER MAINTENANCE OF SAID DRAINAGE PRIOR TO FINAL ACCEPTANCE OF THE PROJECT WILL BE THE CONTRACTOR'S RESPONSIBILITY. 7. BMP’S SHALL BE INSTALLED BEFORE ANY EARTH DISTURBING ACTIVITIES COMMENCE. 8. STORMWATER DISCHARGES FROM CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITIES SHALL NOT CAUSE, HAVE THE REASONABLE POTENTIAL TO CAUSE, OR MEASURABLY CONTRIBUTE TO AN EXCEEDANCE OF ANY WATER QUALITY STANDARD. 9. SEDIMENT CAUSED BY ACCELERATED SOIL EROSION SHALL BE REMOVED FROM RUNOFF WATER BEFORE IT LEAVES THE CONSTRUCTION SITE. 10. BULK STORAGE STRUCTURES FOR PETROLEUM PRODUCTS AND ANY OTHER CHEMICALS SHALL HAVE SECONDARY CONTAINMENT OR EQUIVALENT PROTECTION TO CONTAIN ALL SPILLS AND PREVENT ANY SPILLED MATERIAL FROM ENTERING STATE WATERS AND\OR CITY'S STORMWATER DRAINAGE SYSTEM. 11. THE EROSION CONTROL PLAN SHALL BE CONTINUOUSLY UPDATED TO REFLECT NEW OR REVISED BEST MANAGEMENT PRACTICES (BMP’S) DUE TO CHANGES IN DESIGN, CONSTRUCTION, OPERATION, OR MAINTENANCE OF THE CONSTRUCTION SITE. UPDATES MUST BE MADE WITHIN 72 HOURS FOLLOWING THE CHANGE IN BMP’S. 12. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL INSPECT THE CONSTRUCTION SITE (INCLUDING ALL BMP’S, STORAGE CONTAINERS, AND CONSTRUCTION EQUIPMENT) A MINIMUM OF EVERY 14 CALENDAR DAYS AND WITHIN 24 HOURS AFTER A PRECIPITATION EVENT OR SNOW MELT THAT MAY CAUSE SURFACE EROSION. 13. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL KEEP A RECORD OF ALL INSPECTIONS ON SITE AND AVAILABLE FOR REVIEW BY CITY STAFF. INSPECTION REPORTS MUST IDENTIFY ANY INCIDENTS OF NON-COMPLIANCE WITH THE TERMS AND CONDITIONS OF THE PERMIT. 14. STRAW BALES SHALL NOT BE USED FOR PRIMARY EROSION OR SEDIMENT CONTROL (I.E. STRAW BALES MAY BE USED FOR REINFORCEMENT BEHIND ANOTHER BMP SUCH AS SILT FENCE). 15. BMP’S INTENDED FOR SHEET FLOW SEDIMENT RUNOFF SHALL BE PLACED PARALLEL TO THE SLOPE. 16. ALL BMP’S SHALL BE CLEANED WHEN SEDIMENT LEVELS ACCUMULATE TO HALF THE DESIGN OF THE BMP UNLESS OTHERWISE SPECIFIED. 17. IF TRACK-OUT DOES OCCUR, THE CONTRACTOR SHALL IMMEDIATELY SWEEP THE STREET OF DEBRIS. 18. ALL PORTA-POTTY STRUCTURES MUST BE FIRMLY SECURED WITH #4 REBAR ANCHORS OR EQUAL. 19. NO WASHING OUT OF CONCRETE TRUCKS OR WASHING OF SWEEPINGS FROM EXPOSED AGGREGATE CONCRETE INTO STORM DRAINS, OPEN DITCHES, STREETS OR STREAMS IS ALLOWED 20. EXCESS CONCRETE IS NOT ALLOWED TO BE DUMPED ON-SITE. 21. STOCKPILES OF SOIL OR OTHER ERODABLE MATERIALS MUST BE MANAGED SO THAT STORMWATER DOES NOT COME IN CONTACT WITH THE PILE AND POTENTIALLY WASH POLLUTANTS OFFSITE. AT A MINIMUM STOCKPILES SHALL BE ROUTINELY WETTED AND/OR BLANKETED AS WELL AS INCLUDE AN EROSION SOCK PERIMETER BARRIER TO PREVENT WIND EROSION AND SEDIMENT TRANSPORT OFFSITE. STOCKPILES THAT ARE INACTIVE FOR MORE THAN 7 DAYS WILL REQUIRE SOIL BINDER OR HAVE MUCLH/MULCH TACKIFIER APPLIED. 22. EROSION CONTROL BLANKETS SHALL BE INSTALLED ON ALL SLOPES EXCEEDING 4:1. 126 3.4' R3.0' R3.0' 140.93° 7.0' 6.0'4.1' 25.0' 8.0' 4.0' CURB & GUTTER - TYPE 2 CAST IN PLACE (SPECIAL II-B) (GRADE TO DRAIN) CONCRETE ELECTRICAL FOUNDATIONS. SEE STRUCTURAL PLANS CURB & GUTTER - TYPE 2 CAST IN PLACE (SPECIAL IB) SPECIAL (GRADE TO DRAIN) HOT MIX ASPHALT (PATCHING) (ASPHALT) MATCH EXISTING. GRADE TO DRAIN DOWEL GUTTER TO EXISTING CONCRETE PAVEMENT. SEE DETAIL SHEET C400 EXISTING ELECTRIC VAULT BLOCK 90 ALLEY BUS TRANSIT DRIVE LANE PARK PLACE CONDOMINIUMS SEE DETAIL SHEET C400 FOR T PATCH INFO RESET BIO-RETENTION INLET FILTER (TYP., x3) PEDESTAL FOR CHARGING POLE WITH UNDERGROUND CONCRETE FOOTING AREA OF BIO-RETENTION CELL RECONSTRUCTION FG 7927.40' WSE 7927.50' 1.1' CONNECT TO EXISTING BIO-RETENTION SYSTEM. OVERLAP GEOTEXTILE LAYERS 1' MINIMUM. WELD 30 MIL GEOMEMBRANE TO EXISTING AREA OF BIO-RETENTION CELL RECONSTRUCTION FG 7927.90' WSE 7928.11' RESET SIGN PROTECT EXISTING 4" PERFORATED UNDERDRAIN PIPE (LOCATION APPROXIMATE) 1.3'SURFACE-MOUNTED BOLLARD (TYP.) SEE DETAIL SHEET C400 EXPANSION JOINT (SEE DETAIL CDOT M-412-1) R SEH Project Checked By Drawn By Project Status Issue Date This drawing is an instrument of service and shall remain the property of Short Elliott Hendrickson, Inc. (SEH). This drawing, concepts and ideas contained herein shall not be used, reproduced, revised, or retained without the express written approval of SEH. Submission or distribution of this drawing to meet official or regulatory requirements or for purposes in connection with the project is not be construed as publication in derogation of any of the rights of SEH. NOT F O R CONST R U CTI O N Short Elliott Hendrickson, Inc.All Rights ReservedCOPYRIGHT © 2023PROJECT OWNER ROARING FORK TRANSPORTATION AUTHORITY 51 SERVICE CENTER DRIVE ASPEN, COLORADO 81611 \\sehinc.com\panzura\pzprojects\PT\R\ROFTA\165526\99 Civil\5-final-dsgn\51-drawings\Plansheets\CDs\165526 Site Plan.dwg 5/1/2023 3:41:41 PMRUBEY PARK ELECTRIC CHARGERASPEN, COLORADO81611165526 TN JJROARING FORK TRANSIT AUTHORITY30% DESIGN DOCUMENTS 05/03/2023 REVISION SCHEDULE REV. # DESCRIPTION DATE 0 feetscale 5 105 2.5 C200 SITE PLAN CONSTRUCTION NOTES 1. A FIELD SURVEY WAS NOT PERFORMED AS A PART OF THIS PROJECT. ALL LOCATIONS SHOWN ARE APPROXIMATE BASED ON RECORD DRAWINGS. CONTRACTOR SHALL CONSTRUCT SITE FEATURES USING EXISTING FEATURES AS REFERENCE POINTS. REFER TO PLAN SHEET DIMENSIONS AND CALLOUTS FOR LOCATIVE INFORMATION. 2. ALL WORK SHALL BE IN ACCORDANCE WITH PROJECT SPECIFICATIONS. 3. ALL EXISTING UTILITIES EITHER UNDERGROUND OR OVERHEAD, SHALL BE MAINTAINED IN CONTINUOUS SERVICE THROUGHOUT THE ENTIRE CONSTRUCTION PERIOD. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE AND LIABLE FOR ANY DAMAGE TO, OR INTERRUPTION OF SERVICES CAUSED BY THE CONSTRUCTION. 4. ALL CONTRACTORS AND SUBCONTRACTORS SHALL HAVE A SET OF APPROVED CONSTRUCTION DOCUMENTS ON SITE AT ALL TIMES. 5. THE GENERAL CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR PROTECTING EXISTING CONDITIONS OUTSIDE THE DESIGNATED IMPROVEMENT AREA FROM DAMAGE. ANY DAMAGE TO EXISTING AREAS OUTSIDE THE DESIGNATED IMPROVEMENT AREA DURING CONSTRUCTION SHALL, AT A MINIMUM, BE RESTORED TO A STATE EQUAL TO ITS PRE CONSTRUCTION STATE. 6. THE GENERAL CONTRACTOR SHALL OBTAIN ALL NECESSARY PERMITS TO COMPLETE WORK PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION, AND SHALL COMPLY WITH ALL LOCAL, STATE, AND FEDERAL REGULATIONS. IDENTIFYING THE NEED FOR A PERMIT, PREPARING THE APPLICATION, AND PAYING THE SUBMITTAL AND REVIEW FEES NECESSARY TO SECURE PERMITS WILL BE THE TOTAL RESPONSIBILITY OF THE GENERAL CONTRACTOR. A COPY OF ALL PERMITS MUST BE POSTED AND WEATHER PROOFED ON SITE AT ALL TIMES. 7. THE GENERAL CONTRACTOR SHALL PERFORM THE WORK ACCORDING TO ALL LOCAL GOVERNMENT, COUNTY, STATE, AND FEDERAL SAFETY AND HEALTH REGULATIONS. IN PARTICULAR, THE "TRENCHING" AND "OPEN EXCAVATION" OPERATIONS SHALL COMPLY WITH ALL CURRENT O.S.H.A. REGULATORY REQUIREMENTS. 8. THE GENERAL CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR SECURING THEIR OWN DISPOSAL SITE FOR ALL DISPOSED MATERIALS. 9. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR COORDINATING INSPECTIONS AND TESTING AS PRESCRIBED IN THEIR PERMITS AND CONTRACT DOCUMENTS. 10. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL INSTALL AND MAINTAIN FENCES, BARRIERS, LIGHTS AND SIGNS THAT ARE NECESSARY TO GIVE ADEQUATE WARNING TO THE PUBLIC AND TRAVELING MOTORISTS AT ALL TIMES PER MUTCD. 11. NO MATERIAL OR EQUIPMENT SHALL BE STORED IN THE PUBLIC RIGHT-OF-WAY WITHOUT PRIOR WRITTEN APPROVAL FROM THE CITY. 12. CONTRACTOR SHALL NOTIFY ALL PUBLIC OR PRIVATE UTILITY OWNERS FORTY-EIGHT HOURS (OR AS REQUIRED BY UTILITY COMPANIES) PRIOR TO COMMENCEMENT OF WORK ADJACENT TO THE UTILITY. 13. CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FOR OBTAINING A LOCATION FOR PROJECT STAGING AND RELATED EROSION CONTROL MEASURES. 14. CONTRACTOR TO DIVERT SURFACE DRAINAGE AROUND PROJECT AREA USING GRAVEL BAGS OR SIMILAR METHODS. 127 BUS TRANSIT DRIVE LANE SANSS A N S A N S A N S A N S A N S A N S A N S ELECTRIC TRANSFORMER CONNECTION ETHERNET CONNECTION EXISTING ELECTRIC VAULT PARK PLACE CONDOMINIUMS RESET EXISTING 4" PERFORATED UNDERDRAIN PIPE (LOCATION APPROXIMATE) 00+2 31 LF 4" CORRUGATED PVC @ 0.50%38 LF 4" CORRUGATED PVC @ 0.50% STORM UNDERDRAIN RISER AND CLEANOUT WITH CAP RIM ELEV. 7927.40 STA = 1+95.1, 0.0' TIE-IN EXISTING RISER STA = 1+57.3, 0.0' TIE-IN EXISTING RISER STA = 2+41.2, 0.0' RSTORM UNDERDRAIN RISER AND CLEANOUT WITH CAP RIM ELEV. 7927.90 STA = 2+26.0, 0.0' L BLOCK 90 ALLEY SEE 30 MIL GEOMEMBRANE LINER/PIPING PENETRATION DETAIL 7927.94 TOP OF WALL EXISTING 4" PVC SANITARY SERVICE 7925 7930 7935 7925 7930 7935 1+50 2+00 2+50 38 LF 4" CORRUGATED PVC @ 0.50%31 LF 4" CORRUGATED PVC @ 0.50% STA. 1+79.86 ELECTRIC SERVICE STA. 1+81.86 ELECTRIC SERVICE STA. 1+87.17 EXISTING COMM SERVICE STA. 2+04.39 ETHERNET SERVICE STA. 2+31.13 EXISTING COMM SERVICE STA. 2+34.93 EXISTING ELECTRIC SERVICE STA. 1+83.55 EXISTING 4" PVC SANITARY SERVICE PROPOSED GRADE AT PIPE CENTERLINE STORM UNDERDRAIN RISERAND CLEANOUT WITH CAPSTA 1+95.10, 0.00RIM=7927.40W INV. 7924.26E INV. 7924.26EXISTING RISER AND CLEANOUTSTA 2+41.16, R 0.00EXISTING RISER AND CLEANOUTSTA 1+57.29, 0.00RIM=7926.60E INV. 7924.07W INV. 7924.07TIE-IN EXISTING RISER TIE-IN EXISTING 4" PERFORATED PIPE EXISTING 4" PERFORATED PIPE EXISTING 4" PERFORATED PIPE EXISTING WEIR CUTOFF WALL EXISTING WEIR CUTOFF WALL. GROUT EXISTING PIPE PENETRATION STORM UNDERDRAIN RISERAND CLEANOUT WITH CAPSTA 2+26.03, L 0.00RIM=7927.90W INV. 7924.42E INV. 7925.98STA. 1+97.05 TOP OF WALL 7927.94 WEIR CUTOFF WALL SEE CIVIL DETAILS NON-WOVEN GEOTEXTILE FABRIC (TYP.) 30 MIL. GEOMEMBRANE LINER (TYP.) EXISTING GRADE AT PIPE CENTERLINE R SEH Project Checked By Drawn By Project Status Issue Date This drawing is an instrument of service and shall remain the property of Short Elliott Hendrickson, Inc. (SEH). This drawing, concepts and ideas contained herein shall not be used, reproduced, revised, or retained without the express written approval of SEH. Submission or distribution of this drawing to meet official or regulatory requirements or for purposes in connection with the project is not be construed as publication in derogation of any of the rights of SEH. NOT F O R CONST R U CTI O N Short Elliott Hendrickson, Inc.All Rights ReservedCOPYRIGHT © 2023PROJECT OWNER ROARING FORK TRANSPORTATION AUTHORITY 51 SERVICE CENTER DRIVE ASPEN, COLORADO 81611 \\sehinc.com\panzura\pzprojects\PT\R\ROFTA\165526\99 Civil\5-final-dsgn\51-drawings\Plansheets\CDs\165526 Utility Plan.dwg 5/1/2023 3:41:54 PMRUBEY PARK ELECTRIC CHARGERASPEN, COLORADO81611165526 TN JJROARING FORK TRANSIT AUTHORITY30% DESIGN DOCUMENTS 05/03/2023 REVISION SCHEDULE REV. # DESCRIPTION DATE 0 feetscale 5 105 2.5 C300 UTILITY PLAN UTILITY NOTES 1. A FIELD SURVEY WAS NOT PERFORMED AS A PART OF THIS PROJECT. ALL LOCATIONS SHOWN ARE APPROXIMATE BASED ON RECORD DRAWINGS. CONTRACTOR SHALL CONSTRUCT SITE FEATURES USING EXISTING FEATURES AS REFERENCE POINTS. REFER TO PLAN SHEET DIMENSIONS AND CALLOUTS FOR LOCATIVE INFORMATION. 2. UTILITIES SHALL COMPLY WITH THE CITY OF ASPEN ENGINEERING STANDARDS AND RESPECTIVE UTILITY PROVIDER STANDARDS. ALL ELECTRIC WORK TO BE COORDINATED THROUGH CITY OF ASPEN ELECTRIC DEPARTMENT. (970) 920-5148 3. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL PERFORM ALL UTILITY WORK IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE UTILITY OWNERS SPECIFICATIONS. 4. IT IS THE RESPONSIBILITY OF THE CONTRACTOR TO CONTACT ALL UTILITY COMPANIES FOR FIELD LOCATIONS OF UTILITIES PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION AND TO COORDINATE CONNECTIONS AND/OR EXTENSIONS FOR SERVICES. 5. THE LOCATIONS OF UNDERGROUND UTILITIES HAVE BEEN PLOTTED BASED ON UTILITY MAPS AND CONSTRUCTION/AS-BUILT PLANS. THESE UTILITIES, AS SHOWN, MAY NOT REPRESENT ACTUAL FIELD CONDITIONS. IT IS THE RESPONSIBILITY OF THE CONTRACTOR TO OBTAIN LOCATES OF ALL EXISTING UTILITIES PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION. 6. ALL UTILITIES, BOTH UNDERGROUND AND OVERHEAD, SHALL BE MAINTAINED IN CONTINUOUS SERVICE THROUGHOUT THE ENTIRE CONSTRUCTION PERIOD. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE AND LIABLE FOR ANY DAMAGES TO, OR INTERRUPTION OF, SERVICES CAUSED BY THE CONSTRUCTION. 7. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL CONTAIN HIS CONSTRUCTION OPERATIONS TO WITHIN THE SITE BOUNDARIES. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL NOT OPERATE OUTSIDE THIS AREA WITHOUT THE PRIOR EXPRESSED CONSENT OF THE OWNER OR PUBLIC UTILITY REPRESENTATIVES. 8. ANY DAMAGE TO PUBLIC OR PRIVATE PROPERTY BY THE CONTRACTOR OUTSIDE THESE LIMITS WITHOUT THE PERMISSION OF THE PUBLIC OR PRIVATE OWNER OR UTILITY COMPANY REPRESENTATIVES WILL BE THE RESPONSIBILITY OF THE CONTRACTOR. 9. THE CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FOR COORDINATION, SCHEDULING, AND INSTALLATION OF ELECTRIC AND ETHERNET UTILITIES PURSUANT TO SPECIFICATIONS AND UTILITY SERVICE AGREEMENTS WITH THE UTILITY PROVIDERS. 10. ALL UTILITIES MUST BE POTHOLED PRIOR TO EXCAVATION. 11. ALL MINIMUM DEPTHS, SEPARATION DISTANCES, MATERIALS AND/OR USE OF CONDUIT SHALL BE CONFIRMED AND COORDINATED WITH THE UTILITY PROVIDER PER UTILITY AGREEMENTS. 12. ALL UTILITY LINES AND/OR CONDUITS TO BE BACKFILLED WITH SUITABLE MATERIAL FREE OF ROCKS >1 1/2" Ø. USE CLASS 6 AGGREGATE BASE MATERIAL FOR BEDDING, AND/OR SUITABLE ONSITE MATERIAL. INSTALL PER UTILITY PROVIDER SPECIFICATIONS. BACKFILL TRENCHES WITH SUITABLE ONSITE MATERIALS. MINIMUM COMPACTION 95% IN PAVED AREAS. 13. ELECTRIC LINES MAY BE INSTALLED IN COMBINED TRENCHES PER CONSTRUCTION FEASIBILITY AS LONG AS MINIMUM SEPARATION DISTANCES AND DEPTHS OF BURY ARE MAINTAINED. INSTALL WARNING TAPE OVER ALL UTILITY LINES. 14. ALL VERTICAL DROPS, RISERS, AND WALL PENETRATIONS SHALL BE SOLID PVC PIPE. HORIZ. 1" = 5' VERT. 1" = 2' 128 NOTES: 1. CONCRETE TO BE 4,500 PSI, CDOT CLASS D OR P PER SPECIFICATION SECT. 412. 2. TOOL JOINT AT EVEN SPACING NOT MORE THAN 10'. 3. CONCRETE TO INCLUDE FIBERMESH 300 ( 3 4" FIBERS) AT 1.5 LBS PER CUBIC YARD. NOTES: 1. CONCRETE TO BE 4,500 PSI, CDOT CLASS D OR P PER SPECIFICATION SECT. 412. 2. TOOL JOINT AT EVEN SPACING NOT MORE THAN 10'. 3. CONCRETE TO INCLUDE FIBERMESH 300 ( 3 4" FIBERS) AT 1.5 LBS PER CUBIC YARD. GEOTEXTILE FILTER FABRIC. SEE TABLE A FOR SPECIFICATIONS. 4" PERFORATED UNDERDRAIN PIPE @ 0.5% MIN. SLOPE (SEE PLANS FOR PIPE INVERT ELEVATIONS) GEOTEXTILE FILTER FABRIC PROTECTION LAYER. 30 MIL GEOMEMBRANE LINER 8" MIN. CDOT #67 AGG. VARIES (34" MINIMUM) GROW MEDIA (SEE NOTES) BED ELEV. (SEE PLANS) WQ WSE PROPOSED CURB (SEE PLANS) PROPOSED CURB (SEE PLANS) RE. GEOMEMBRANE LINER TO CONCRETE CONNECTION DETAIL MHFD TABLE B-1 MATERIAL SPECIFICATIONS FOR BIORETENTION/RAIN GARDEN FACILITIES MATERIAL SPECIFICATION SUBMITTALS TESTING NOTES UNDERDRAIN PIPE PIPE DIAMETER AND TYPE MAXIMUM SLOT WIDTH (INCHES) MINIMUM OPEN AREA (PER FOOT) REQUIRED PIPE MUST CONFORM TO REQUIREMENTS OF ASTM DESIGNATION F949. THERE SHALL BE NO EVIDENCE OF SPLITTING, CRACKING, OR BREAKING WHEN THE PIPE IS TESTED PER ASTM TEST METHOD D2412 IN ACCORDANCE WITH F949 SECTION 7.5 AND ASTM F794 SECTION 8.5. CONTECH A-2000 SLOTTED PIPE (OR EQUAL) 4-INCH SLOTTED PVC 0.032 190 IN.² 6-INCH SLOTTED PVC 0.032 199 IN.² 1" NO. 4 TIE BARS 30" O.C. (SEE DETAIL CDOT M-412-1) NO. 4 TIE BARS 30" O.C. (SEE DETAIL CDOT M-412-1) R SEH Project Checked By Drawn By Project Status Issue Date This drawing is an instrument of service and shall remain the property of Short Elliott Hendrickson, Inc. (SEH). This drawing, concepts and ideas contained herein shall not be used, reproduced, revised, or retained without the express written approval of SEH. Submission or distribution of this drawing to meet official or regulatory requirements or for purposes in connection with the project is not be construed as publication in derogation of any of the rights of SEH. NOT F O R CONST R U CTI O N Short Elliott Hendrickson, Inc.All Rights ReservedCOPYRIGHT © 2023PROJECT OWNER ROARING FORK TRANSPORTATION AUTHORITY 51 SERVICE CENTER DRIVE ASPEN, COLORADO 81611 \\sehinc.com\panzura\pzprojects\PT\R\ROFTA\165526\99 Civil\5-final-dsgn\51-drawings\Plansheets\CDs\165526 Details.dwg 5/1/2023 3:42:32 PMRUBEY PARK ELECTRIC CHARGERASPEN, COLORADO81611165526 TN JJROARING FORK TRANSIT AUTHORITY30% DESIGN DOCUMENTS 05/03/2023 REVISION SCHEDULE REV. # DESCRIPTION DATE C400 CIVIL DETAILS 129 YELLOW PAINT PROPOSED GRADE (SEE PLANS) PROPOSED GRADE (SEE PLANS) VARIES (42" MINIMUM)VARIES (42" MINIMUM) TIE BARS (BOTH SIDES); SEE NOTES 48" 6" 12" 12" MAX 2" CRL SEE PLANS LOWER BIO-RETENTION CELL UPPER BIO-RETENTION CELL GEOTEXTILE FILTER FABRIC GEOMEMBRANE LINER R SEH Project Checked By Drawn By Project Status Issue Date This drawing is an instrument of service and shall remain the property of Short Elliott Hendrickson, Inc. (SEH). This drawing, concepts and ideas contained herein shall not be used, reproduced, revised, or retained without the express written approval of SEH. Submission or distribution of this drawing to meet official or regulatory requirements or for purposes in connection with the project is not be construed as publication in derogation of any of the rights of SEH. NOT F O R CONST R U CTI O N Short Elliott Hendrickson, Inc.All Rights ReservedCOPYRIGHT © 2023PROJECT OWNER ROARING FORK TRANSPORTATION AUTHORITY 51 SERVICE CENTER DRIVE ASPEN, COLORADO 81611 \\sehinc.com\panzura\pzprojects\PT\R\ROFTA\165526\99 Civil\5-final-dsgn\51-drawings\Plansheets\CDs\165526 Details.dwg 5/1/2023 3:42:44 PMRUBEY PARK ELECTRIC CHARGERASPEN, COLORADO81611165526 TN JJROARING FORK TRANSIT AUTHORITY30% DESIGN DOCUMENTS 05/03/2023 REVISION SCHEDULE REV. # DESCRIPTION DATE C401 CIVIL DETAILS 130 7' VAULT RE: CIVIL + CITY OF ASPEN NO DISTURBANCE TO EXISTING PLANTINGS EXISTING TREE TO PRESERVE 3' CLEARANCE OFFSET AT 7' VAULT (NO PLANTINGS > 24" HT) DRAINLINE CLEANOUT RISER, TYP. RE: CIVIL CURB INLET, TYP. RE: CIVIL BOLLARD, TYP. RE: CIVIL NO DISTURBANCE TO EXISTING PLANTINGS 4' BUS OVERHANG CLEARANCE ZONE LEGEND: NOTE: PLANT TOTALS HAVE BEEN PROVIDED FOR REFERENCE ONLY. IF THERE IS A DISCREPANCY BETWEEN THE TOTAL QUANTITIES IDENTIFIED IN THE LEGEND & THE ACTUAL NUMBER OF PLANT SYMBOLS DEPICTED ON THE PLANS, THE CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FOR INSTALLING THE ACTUAL NUMBER OF PLANTS AS SYMBOLICALLY DEPICTED ON THE PLANS. EXISTING NARROWLEAF COTTONWOOD TO BE PRESERVED AND PROTECTED FROM CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITY EXISTING 'PRAIRIE BLUES' LITTLE BLUESTEM GRASS TO REMAIN WHERE POSSIBLE CORNUS SERICEA 'ISANTI' ISANTI REDTWIG DOGWOOD TREES, SHRUBS, AND PERENNIALS BOTANICAL/COMMON NAME CONT QTY CALAMAGROSTIS ACUTIFLORA 'KARL FOERSTER' FEATHER REED GRASS SCHIZACHYRIUM SCOPARIUM 'PRAIRIE BLUES' PRAIRIE BLUES LITTLE BLUESTEM GRASS PANICUM VIRGATUM 'HEAVY METAL' HEAVY METAL BLUE SWITCHGRASS 1 GAL 1 GAL 1 GAL 5 GAL IRIS SIBIRICA 'CAESAR'S BROTHER' BLUE SIBERIAN IRIS 1 GAL (4) (15) (93) (64) (62) EXISTING TREES AND /PERENNIALS POPULUS TREMULA 'ERECTA' COLUMNAR SWEDISH ASPEN 3" CAL (5) POPULUS ANGUSTIFOLIA NARROWLEAF COTTONWOOD 4" CAL (1) 30% DESIGN DOCUMENTSRUBEY PARK ELECTRIC CHARGERASPEN, COLORADO81611165526 CB SD, CF, CBROARING FORK TRANSIT AUTHORITY30% DESIGN DOCUMENTS 05/03/2023 L-1 PLANTING PLAN R SEH Project Checked By Drawn By Project Status Issue Date This drawing is an instrument of service and shall remain the property of Short Elliott Hendrickson, Inc. (SEH). This drawing, concepts and ideas contained herein shall not be used, reproduced, revised, or retained without the express written approval of SEH. Submission or distribution of this drawing to meet official or regulatory requirements or for purposes in connection with the project is not be construed as publication in derogation of any of the rights of SEH. NOT F O R CONST R U CTI O N Short Elliott Hendrickson, Inc.All Rights ReservedCOPYRIGHT © 2023PROJECT OWNER ROARING FORK TRANSPORTATION AUTHORITY 0051 SEVICE CENTER DRIVE ASPEN, COLORADO 81611 REVISION SCHEDULE REV. # DESCRIPTION DATE 131 2 X DIAMETER ROOTBALL, MIN. NOT TO SCALEL-2 2 SHRUB PLANTING 1. CONTRACTOR SHALL NOT WILLFULLY PROCEED WITH CONSTRUCTION AS DESIGNED WHEN IT IS OBVIOUS THAT UNKNOWN OBSTRUCTIONS, AREA DISCREPANCIES AND/OR GRADE DIFFERENCES EXIST THAT MAY NOT HAVE BEEN KNOWN DURING DESIGN. SUCH CONDITIONS SHALL BE IMMEDIATELY BROUGHT TO THE ATTENTION OF THE OWNER'S AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL ASSUME FULL RESPONSIBILITY FOR ALL NECESSARY REVISIONS DUE TO FAILURE TO GIVE SUCH NOTIFICATIONS. 2. CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR MAKING THEMSELVES FAMILIAR WITH ALL UNDERGROUND UTILITIES, PIPES AND STRUCTURES. CONTRACTOR SHALL TAKE SOLE RESPONSIBILITY FOR COSTS INCURRED DUE TO DAMAGE AND THE REPLACEMENT OF SAID UTILITIES. LOCATION OF EXISTING UTILITIES SHALL BE VERIFIED BY THE CONTRACTOR PRIOR TO ACTUAL CONSTRUCTION. FOR INFORMATION CONTACT: UTILITY NOTIFICATION CENTER OF COLORADO, 303.232.1991 OR 8-1-1. 3. CONTRACTOR TO CONTACT THE UTILITY NOTIFICATION CENTER OF COLORADO BEFORE DIGGING, INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO, TRENCHING AND SHRUB AND TREE PLANTING PITS. IF UTILITIES OCCUR AT LOCATIONS OF PROPOSED SHRUBS, OR WITHIN EIGHT (8) FEET OF PROPOSED TREES, THE CONTRACTOR SHALL REPORT SUCH CONDITIONS TO THE OWNER'S REPRESENTATIVE. DAMAGE TO EXISTING UTILITIES BY THE LANDSCAPE CONTRACTOR IS THE RESPONSIBILITY OF THE LANDSCAPE CONTRACTOR. 4. THE LANDSCAPE PLAN AND DETAILS ARE TO BE USED IN CONJUNCTION WITH THE CIVIL AND ARCHITECTURAL PLANS TO FORM COMPLETE INFORMATION REGARDING SITE WORK. CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR ANY COORDINATION WITH SUBCONTRACTORS AS REQUIRED TO ACCOMPLISH ALL CONSTRUCTION OPERATIONS. ALL PIPING, CONDUIT, SLEEVES, ETC., SHALL BE SET IN PLACE PRIOR TO INSTALLATION OF CONSTRUCTION ITEMS. 5. ALL EXISTING IMPROVEMENTS TO REMAIN SHALL BE PROPERLY AND ADEQUATELY PROTECTED FROM DAMAGE DURING CONSTRUCTION OPERATIONS. IT SHALL BE THE RESPONSIBILITY OF THE CONTRACTOR TO RESTORE TO THE ORIGINAL CONDITION ANY EXISTING ITEMS THAT ARE DAMAGED OR DISTURBED IN ANY WAY. 6. TO THE MAXIMUM EXTENT POSSIBLE, TOPSOIL THAT IS REMOVED DURING CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITY SHALL BE CONSERVED FOR LATER USE ON AREAS REQUIRING REVEGETATION AND LANDSCAPING. 7. LANDSCAPE CONTRACTOR TO REMOVE ALL ROCK AND DEBRIS OVER 1" IN SIZE AND REMOVED OFF-SITE PRIOR TO INSTALLATION OF PLANT MATERIAL. ALL MATERIALS SHALL BE DISPOSED OF OFF-SITE PER LOCAL CODES & REGULATIONS. 8. ROUGH GRADE AND FINISHED GRADING WILL BE PERFORMED BY OTHERS. LANDSCAPE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR FINE GRADING AFTER SOIL AMENDMENT OPERATIONS TO ALLOW FOR MULCH AND SOD INSTALLATION AS REQUIRED BY THESE DRAWINGS. 9. LANDSCAPE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR MAINTAINING POSITIVE DRAINAGE. CONTRACTOR TO NOTIFY OWNER'S REPRESENTATIVE OF ANY POORLY DRAINED AREAS PRIOR TO COMMENCING WORK. 10. CONTRACTOR SHALL FOLLOW THE LANDSCAPE PLAN. ANY DISCREPANCIES BETWEEN THE PLAN AND FIELD CONDITIONS SHALL BE REPORTED TO THE OWNER'S AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE AND LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT BEFORE PROCEEDING WITH WORK. 11. CONTRACTOR SHALL USE LOCAL BEST MANAGEMENT PRACTICES FOR OBTAINING AND INSTALLING LANDSCAPE MATERIALS. COMPLETE THE WORK USING SKILLED PERSONNEL, PROFICIENT IN THE TRADES REQUIRED & IN A NEAT , ORDERLY AND RESPONSIBLE MANNER & WITH RECOGNIZED STANDARDS OF WORKMANSHIP. 12. ALL PLANTS TO BE APPROVED BY OWNER'S REPRESENTATIVE OR LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT PRIOR TO INSTALLATION. NOTIFY OWNER FOR INSPECTION AND APPROVAL OF PLANT MATERIAL AT TIME OF DELIVERY. TREES ARE TO BE TAGGED AT THE NURSERY BY THE LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT. ANY PLANT NOT MEETING OWNERS / LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTS APPROVAL MAY BE REJECTED AT ANY TIME PRIOR TO FINAL ACCEPTANCE. 13. PLANT MATERIAL MUST MEET CURRENT LANDSCAPE NURSERY STANDARDS & / OR ANSI Z60.1. 14. IF PLANTS ARE NOT AVAILABLE, NOTIFY LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT FOR APPROVAL OF CHANGE BEFORE MAKING SUBSTITUTIONS. 15. THE LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT MUST APPROVE ALL PLANTING LAYOUTS PRIOR TO PLANTING. ALL ADJUSTMENTS SHALL BE MADE BY THE CONTRACTOR PRIOR TO INSTALLING PLANTS. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL NOT DIG PLANT PITS UNTIL LOCATIONS ARE APPROVED. 16. MINOR FIELD ADJUSTMENTS TO THE PLANTING PLANS MAY BE NECESSARY BASED ON THE ACTUAL LOCATION OF LIGHTS, TRANSFORMERS, GROUND-MOUNTED HVAC UNITS, UTILITY PEDESTALS, AND SIMILAR FEATURES. ADDITIONAL LANDSCAPING AND SCREENING MAY BE REQUIRED BASED UPON FIELD CONDITIONS DURING THE SITE INSPECTION PRIOR TO INITIAL ACCEPTANCE. CONTRACTOR MUST OBTAIN APPROVAL FROM THE LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT PRIOR TO ADJUSTING THE DESIGN. 17. IF THERE IS A DISCREPANCY BETWEEN THE PLANT COUNTS ON THE PLANS & THE ACTUAL NUMBER OF PLANT SYMBOLS DEPICTED ON THE PLANS, THE CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FOR INSTALLING THE ACTUAL NUMBER OF PLANTS AS SYMBOLICALLY DEPICTED ON THE PLANS. 18. SHRUB BEDS SHALL RECEIVE A MINIMUM OF 4 CU. YDS. PER 1000 S.F. OF A-1 ORGANIC'S BIOCOMP, OR A WELL DECOMPOSED COMPOST APPROVED BY THE OWNER'S AUTHORIZED. ALL AMENDMENTS SHALL BE THOROUGHLY TILLED A MIN. OF 6" INTO THE SOIL. 19. TREE BASKETS SHALL BE REMOVED FROM ROOTBALLS AND KEPT BY THE PLANTED TREE UNTIL VERIFIED BY THE OWNER'S REPRESENTATIVE OR LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT. 20. ALL LANDSCAPE AREAS WILL BE IRRIGATED WITH A FULLY AUTOMATIC UNDERGROUND IRRIGATION SYSTEM. 21. MULCH - ALL PLANTING BEDS SHALL BE COVERED BY A SPECIFIED MULCH (OR ACCEPTED SUBSTITUTION) AS APPROVED BY THE LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT. ALSO REFER TO SPECIFICATIONS AND DETAILS. 21.1. ALL SHRUB BEDS SHALL RECEIVE A MINIMUM OF 3" OF MULCH. 21.1.1. EXCEPT GROUNDCOVERS SHALL RECEIVE 2" OF MULCH. 21.1.2. MULCH RINGS AROUND SHRUBS IN NATIVE AREAS SHALL BE A MINIMUM OF 3' Ø. 21.1.3. DO NOT BURY PERENNIALS OR ORNAMENTAL GRASSES WITH MULCH. 21.2. MULCH AROUND TREES SHALL BE 4" DEEP IN NON-TURF AREAS & 2" DEEP IN TURF AREAS. 21.2.1. PULL MULCH BACK 6" FROM TRUNK OF TREES AS PER DETAILS. 21.2.2. MULCH RINGS AROUND TREES IN NATIVE AREAS SHALL BE MINIMUM 8' Ø. 21.2.3. DO NOT PROVIDE A WATER BASIN FOR TREES IN LAWN AREAS 22. SPACING / LAYOUT 22.1. TREES SHALL BE LOCATED AS IDENTIFIED ON PLANS. LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT SHALL VERIFY ALL TREE LOCATIONS PRIOR TO INSTALLATION. 22.2. TREES TO BE A MINIMUM OF 8' FROM CENTER LINE OF UNDERGROUND UTILITIES SUCH AS STORM SEWERS, WATER MAINS, ETC. 22.3. ALL EVERGREEN TREES SHALL BE A MINIMUM OF 12' FROM TRAILS, OR WALKS. EDGING SHALL BE MINIMUM OF 8' FROM EVERGREEN TREES. 22.4. LARGE SHRUBS (THOSE OVER 6' SPACING AS SHOWN IN THE PLANT SCHEDULE) SHALL BE PLANTED A MINIMUM OF 5' FROM EDGER OR WALKS. 22.5. SMALLER SHRUBS (THOSE LESS THAN 6' SPACING AS SHOWN IN THE PLANT SCHEDULE) SHALL BE PLANTED A MINIMUM OF 3' FROM EDGER OR WALKS. 23. WHEN PLANTING TREES, THE 1ST STRUCTURAL ROOT SHOULD BE PLACED 1" ABOVE THE FINISHED GRADE. SEE DETAILS AND SPECIFICATIONS. PLANTING NOTES: NOTES: 1. ANY BROKEN OR CRUMBLING ROOTBALL WILL BE REJECTED. REMOVING THE CONTAINERS WILL NOT BE AN EXCUSE FOR DAMAGED ROOTBALLS. 2. REFER TO CIVIL FOR FINISH GRADES. 3. ALL MULCH TO BE SOIL PEP. CONTRACTOR TO PROVIDE SAMPLE FOR APPROVAL BY LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT AND OWNER PRIOR TO INSTALLATION. PRUNE DAMAGED OR DEAD WOOD AS DIRECTED BY LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT DO NOT CUT LEADER PRUNE ALL DAMAGED OR DEAD WOOD IMMEDIATELY PRIOR TO PLANTING. SET SHRUB 1" HIGHER THAN THE GRADE AT WHICH IT GREW. DIG PLANT PIT TWICE AS WIDE AS THE CONTAINER OR MORE. APPLY SOIL PEP 4" DEEP IN SHRUB BEDS. WEED FABRIC REMOVE CONTAINER. ROUGHEN SIDES OF PLANT PIT. SCORE SIDES OF ROOTBALL OF ROOTBOUND PLANTS ONLY. FILL PLANT PIT WITH PLANTER MIX. 2'-0" MIN.VARIESNOT TO SCALEL-2 1 DECIDUOUS TREE PLANTING 3x DIAMETER OF ROOTBALL, MIN. WRAP ENTIRE SURFACE OF TRUNK UP TO SECOND BRANCH WITH TWO LAYER CREPE TREE WRAP SECURED @ TOP AND BOTTOM AND AT TWO FOOT INTERVALS PLANT TREE W/ TOP OF ROOTBALL 1-2" ABOVE FINAL GRADE MULCH RING, MIN. 30" DIA., PULL MULCH BACK 6" FROM TRUNK 4" HEIGHT WATER SAUCER IN NON-TURF AREAS WEED BARRIER FABRIC BACKFILL WITH SPECIFIED PLANTER MIX AFTER TREE IS SET IN PLANTING PIT, REMOVE ALL TWINE & WIRE FROM TOP & SIDES OF ROOTBALL, PULL BURLAP BACK 1/3 (MIN.) SET ROOTBALL ON UNDISTURBED OR 95% COMPACTED PLANTER MIX PULL MUCH 6" FROM TRUNK NOTES: 1. MULCH TO BE 4" DEEP. MULCH TO BE SOIL PEP. CONTRACTOR TO PROVIDE SAMPLE FOR APPROVAL BY LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT AND OWNER PRIOR TO INSTALLATION. 2. ALL TREES 3" DIAMETER OR LARGER MUST BE STAKED FOR ONE YEAR IF PROPOSED BY LANDSCAPE CONTRACTOR AND APPROVED BY OWNER'S REP. CONCRETE CURB, PER PLANS 30% DESIGN DOCUMENTSRUBEY PARK ELECTRIC CHARGERASPEN, COLORADO81611165526 CB SD, CF, CBROARING FORK TRANSIT AUTHORITY30% DESIGN DOCUMENTS 05/03/2023 L-2 PLANTING NOTES & DETAILS R SEH Project Checked By Drawn By Project Status Issue Date This drawing is an instrument of service and shall remain the property of Short Elliott Hendrickson, Inc. (SEH). This drawing, concepts and ideas contained herein shall not be used, reproduced, revised, or retained without the express written approval of SEH. Submission or distribution of this drawing to meet official or regulatory requirements or for purposes in connection with the project is not be construed as publication in derogation of any of the rights of SEH. NOT F O R CONST R U CTI O N Short Elliott Hendrickson, Inc.All Rights ReservedCOPYRIGHT © 2023PROJECT OWNER ROARING FORK TRANSPORTATION AUTHORITY 0051 SEVICE CENTER DRIVE ASPEN, COLORADO 81611 REVISION SCHEDULE REV. # DESCRIPTION DATE 132 SOIL BASE COURSE, SUB- BASE, GRAVEL, CRUSHED ROCK CONCRETE BRICK MASONRY CUT STONE, SAND, MORTAR, PLASTER CONCRETE MASONRY UNITS STEEL ALUMINUM (OMIT IN THIN MATERIAL) BRONZE, BRASS, COPPER INSULATION BOARD RIGID INSULATION WOOD, FINISH WOOD FRAMING THROUGH MEMBER WOOD FRAMING INTERRUPTED MEMBER METAL LATH PLYWOOD GYPSUM BOARD PARTICLE BOARD GLASS GLASS BLOCK CARPET CERAMIC TILE, QUARRY TILE, OR RESILIENT FLOORING (SHOWN PROFILE ONLY) ASPHALTIC CONCRETE OR A.C. PAVING (SHOWN PROFILE ONLY) BATT INSULATION NEW CONSTRUCTION NON-RATED EXISTING CONSTRUCTION TO REMAIN EXISTING CONSTRUCTION TO BE DEMOLISHED ALL DIMENSIONS ARE TO FACE OF STUD U.N.O. DIMENSION TO FACE OF WALL OR PARTITION DIMENSION TO CENTER OF WALL OR PARTITION INTERNATIONAL SYMBOL: FIXTURE OR SPACE DESIGNED ACCESSIBLE CONCRETE MASONRY PARTITION CONCRETE PARTITION (FOW) 1 A101 SIM A 101 Ref# ## # ROOM NAME 000 150 SF LEVEL 1 100'-0" 10.10 10 101 A F# R# 1 RFI # EXTERIOR ELEVATION NUMBER EXTERIOR ELEVATION SHEET CALLOUT NUMBER CALLOUT SHEET REVISION CLOUD REVISION NUMBER INTERIOR ELEVATION SHEET ROOM AREA ROOM NUMBER ROOM NAME INTERIOR ELEVATION NUMBER LEVEL NAME ELEVATION WINDOW TAG DOOR TAG WALL TAG SPECIAL EQUIPMENT TAG KEYNOTE TAG FLOOR TAG ROOF TAG DETAIL NUMBER DETAIL SHEET BUILDING SECTION NUMBER BUILDING SECTION SHEET 1 A101 SIM WALL SECTION NUMBER WALL SECTION SHEET 1 PLAN KEYNOTE F# R# 100 A101 1 SIM 1 A101 Ref  $ 6,0 4A8"EXDEMONEW DOOR REPRESENTATION NEW DOOR TAG EXISTING DOOR REPRESENTATION "EX" TEXT LABEL DEMO DOOR REPRESENTATION "DEMO" TEXT LABEL WINDOW REPRESENTATION WINDOW TAG LOUVER REPRESENTATION LOUVER TAG100A A 1. THESE DRAWINGS ARE LEGAL INSTRUMENTS OF SERVICE FOR THE USE OF THE OWNER AND ITS AUTHORIZED AGENTS AND VENDORS ON THE DESIGNATED PROJECT ONLY. 2. GC RESPONSIBLE FOR KNOWLEDGE OF RELATIVE INFORMATION CONTAINED IN THESE DOCUMENTS AND THE CONDITIONS UNDER WHICH THE WORK WILL BE PERFORMED. 3. CAREFULLY AND THOROUGHLY EXAMINE THE PROJECT SITE, FIELD VERIFY ALL CONDITIONS, GRADES, ELEVATIONS AND DIMENSIONS OF THE VARIOUS FEATURES OF THE SITE AND COMPARE DRAWINGS WITH THE EXISTING CONDITIONS. ANY DISCREPANCIES AND/OR CONDITIONS NEEDING CLARIFICATION SHALL BE REPORTED IN WRITING TO THE ARCHITECT BEFORE STARTING WORK. 4. ALL CONSTRUCTION, FABRICATION AND INSTALLATION SHALL CONFORM TO THE LATEST LOCALLY ADOPTED EDITIONS OF THE IBC, IPC, IMC, NEC, NFPA, OSHA AND ANY FEDERAL, STATE AND LOCAL CODES, REGULATIONS, STANDARDS AND ORDINANCES OF GOVERNING AGENCIES HAVING JURISDICTION. SUCH APPLICABLE CODES, ETC. ARE THOSE WHICH ARE IN EFFECT AT THE TIME THE PROJECT PERMIT APPLICATION IS RECORDED. 5. ALL TRADES ARE CONSIDERED SPECIALISTS IN THEIR RESPECTIVE FIELD/TRADE AND SHALL, BEFORE SUBMISSION OF BID OR PERFORMANCE OF WORK, NOTIFY THE CONTRACTOR IN WRITING OF ANY WORK ON THE DRAWINGS OR IN THE SPECIFICATIONS WHICH CANNOT BE FULLY WARRANTED OR CONSTRUCTED AS DETAILED OR SPECIFIED. THE CONTRACTOR WILL NOTIFY THE ARCHITECT OF SUCH CONDITIONS IN WRITING. 6. DUE TO REPRODUCTION PROCESSES, DRAWINGS MAY NOT BE ACCURATE TO SCALE. ALL DIMENSIONS SHALL TAKE PRECEDENCE OVER SCALE SHOWN AND IN NO CASE SHALL WORKING DIMENSIONS BE SCALED FROM PLANS, SECTIONS, ELEVATIONS OR DETAILS. 7. THE STRUCTURAL, MECHANICAL, PLUMBING, AND ELECTRICAL DRAWINGS ARE SUPPLEMENTARY TO THE ARCHITECTURAL DRAWINGS. DISCREPANCIES BETWEEN THE VARIOUS DRAWINGS SHALL BE REPORTED BY THE CONTRACTOR TO THE ARCHITECT IN WRITING. 8. BEFORE STARTING WORK, COORDINATE WITH THE OWNER'S REPRESENTATIVE FOR INSTALLATION OF EQUIPMENT INDICATED N.I.C. ON DRAWINGS. VERIFY EQUIPMENT LOCATIONS WITH THE OWNER'S PRESENTATIVE. VERIFY DIMENSIONS, UTILITIES, ETC, WITH EQUIPMENT MANUFACTURERS ROUGH -- IN DATA PRIOR TO FORMING THE SLAB. 9. PRODUCTS AND MANUFACTURED ITEMS SHALL BE PROVIDED AS SPECIFIED. SUBSTITUTIONS WILL BE PERMITTED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE PROCEDURES OUTLINED IN THE SPECIFICATIONS. 10. WHERE DETAILS ARE NOT SHOWN OR NOTED, GC IS TO PROVIDE A WRITTEN REQUEST FOR INFORMATION TO CLARIFY SPECIFIC DETAIL CONDITIONS. 11. ALL INDICATED EXISTING UTILITIES OR STRUCTURES ARE BASED ON INFORMATION OF RECORD. TAKE PRECAUTIONARY MEASURES TO PROTECT THE UTILITY LINES NOT OF RECORD OR NOT SHOWN. BE RESPONSIBLE FOR ANY AND ALL DAMAGE WHICH MAY OCCUR DUE TO FAILURE TO LOCATE AND PROTECT ALL CONCEALED UTILITIES. 12. COMPLY WITH ALL JURISDICTIONAL AGENCY REQUIREMENTS AND REGULATIONS. PERFORM ALL WORK ON THIS PROJECT IN COMPLIANCE WITH THE OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY AND HEALTH STANDARDS 29 CFR 1910 AND 1926 OF THE U.S. DEPARTMENT OF LABOR AND THE AMERICANS WITH DISABILITIES ACT ACCESSIBILITY GUIDELINES. 13. FINAL CONNECTIONS TO EQUIPMENT SHALL BE AS PER MANUFACTURER'S WIRING DIAGRAMS, DETAILS AND INSTRUCTIONS. BE RESPONSIBLE TO PROVIDE MATERIALS AND EQUIPMENT COMPATIBLE WITH EQUIPMENT ACTUALLY SUPPLIED. 14. PROVIDE PERMITS AND INSPECTIONS REQUIRED BY JURISDICTIONAL AGENCIES. 15. PROVIDE SET OF RECORD DRAWINGS TO ARCHITECT. DRAWINGS SHALL INCLUDE ALL ADDENDUM ITEMS, CHANGE ORDERS, ALTERATIONS, REROUTINGS, ETC. 16. SERVICE SHALL BE MAINTAINED TO EXISTING AREAS DURING CONSTRUCTION. PROVIDE PORTABLE GENERATORS, CABLES, OUTLETS ETC., TO MAINTAIN CONTINUITY OF SERVICE PLACEMENT OF SUCH PORTABLE EQUIPMENT SHALL BE SUBJECT TO OWNER APPROVAL. 17. COORDINATE CONSTRUCTION PHASING WITH THE OWNER. TEMPORARY PARTITIONS, LOCATIONS & CONSTRUCTION DETAILS IN PUBLIC SPACES SHALL BE SUBMITTED TO THE OWNER FOR APPROVAL PRIOR TO START OF CONSTRUCTION. 18. PATCH AND MATCH ALL NEW WORK W/ EXISTING WHERE NEW TO EXISTING INTERFACE OCCURS. 19. RESTORE ALL REMOVED OR DAMAGED STRUCTURAL STEEL CEMENTITIOUS FIRE PROOFING TO REQUIRED FIRE RESISTIVE STANDARD. 20. SUBMIT SAMPLES OF ALL EXPOSED PRODUCTS, MATERIALS, PAINTING SYSTEMS, ETC. FOR ARCHITECT'S REVIEW, COLOR SELECTION OR COLOR VERIFICATION PRIOR TO ORDERING ITEMS. 21. SEAL ALL DUCTS, LOUVERS, VENTS, OPENINGS AND CEILING SPACES BETWEEN CONSTRUCTION AREA AND REMAINDER OF SHELLED SPACES TO PREVENT DUST, DIRT, CONTAMINATION OR DEBRIS FROM ENTERING. 22. DO NOT ALLOW DIRT, DEBRIS OR DISCARDED MATERIALS TO ACCUMULATE ON SITE. REMOVE PROMPTLY EACH DAY. 23. VERIFY SERVICES TO BE ABANDONED, REMOVED OR CUT HAVE BEEN PROPERLY AND SAFELY SHUT OFF, CAPPED OR SEALED. 24. KEEP NOISE AND VIBRATION PRODUCING ACTIVITIES AT A MINIMUM WHEN WORKING WITHIN OR ON THE EXISTING BUILDING. APPROPRIATE TIMES OF SUCH ACTIVITIES SHALL BE COORDINATED WITH OWNER IN WRITING AT BEGINNING OF PROJECT. 25. IN THE EVENT THAT NOISE AND VIBRATION PRODUCING ACTIVITIES WILL OCCUR DURING TIMES OTHER THAN THOSE NOTED ABOVE, OBTAIN PERMISSION FROM THE OWNER IN WRITING A MINIMUM OF 72 HOURS PRIOR TO COMMENCEMENT OF ACTIVITIES. 26. KEEP UTILITY AND SERVICE OUTAGES TO A MINIMUM. MAKE WRITTEN OUTAGE REQUESTS AT LEAST FIVE DAYS BEFORE DATE OF PROPOSED OUTAGE. STATE IN THE REQUEST HOURS OF OUTAGE. CONFIRM DATE 48 HOURS IN ADVANCE OF STARTING DATE. 27. ASSIGN THE WORK OF MOVING, REMOVAL, CUTTING, PATCHING AND REPAIR TO TRADES UNDER CONTRACTOR SUPERVISION TO CAUSE THE LEAST DAMAGE TO EACH TYPE OF WORK ENCOUNTERED. 28. PATCHING OF FINISH MATERIALS TO MECHANICS SKILLED IN THE WORK OF THE FINISH TRADE INVOLVED. 29. PROTECT REMAINING FINISHES, EQUIPMENT AND ADJACENT WORK FROM DAMAGE CAUSED BY CUTTING, MOVING AND REMOVAL AND PATCHING OPERATIONS. PROTECT SURFACES WHICH WILL REMAIN A PART OF THE FINISHED WORK. 30. PROTECT EXISTING AND NEW WORK FROM WEATHER DURING CUTTING, MOVING, REMOVAL CONSTR. PROVIDE WEATHER PROTECTION AND OTHER FACILITIES AND PROTECTION AS NEEDED TO PREVENT DAMAGE TO NEW WORK AND TO REMAINING OLD WORK. 31. PROVIDE ADEQUATE SUPPORT OR SUBSTRATE FOR PATCHING FINISHES. 32. USE OF HAZARDOUS MATERIALS SHALL CONFORM WITH 29 CFR 1910.120 AND 1926.65 OF THE OSHA CODE. 33. REMOVAL OF HAZARDOUS WASTE SHALL COMPLY WITH CURRENT FEDERAL, STATE AND LOCAL REGULATIONS, STANDARDS, LAWS AND REQUIREMENTS. 34. THE WET SIDE FIRE PROTECTION CONTRACTOR SHALL PROVIDE TO THE ARCHITECT, THROUGH THE NORMAL SUBMITTAL PROCESS, SPRINKLER PLANS SHOWING PIPING PLANS, POINTS OF CONNECTIONS, HEAD LOCATIONS, VALVE LOCATIONS, CALCULATIONS, AND HEAD TYPES AND FINISHES PRIOR TO SUBMISSION TO THE FIRE DEPARTMENT FOR THE ARCHITECT'S REVIEW AND APPROVAL. DO NOT SUBMIT DRAWINGS TO ANY JURISDICTION PRIOR TO GAINING THIS REVIEW AND APPROVAL. 35. THE ELECTRONIC FIRE PROTECTION CONTRACTOR SHALL PROVIDE TO THE ARCHITECT, THROUGH NORMAL SUBMITTAL PROCESS, PLANS SHOWING THE SIZE, LOCATION, MOUNTING HEIGHTS, AND FINISH OF ALL STROBES, SPEAKERS, AND SPEAKER STROBES AS WELL AS SHOWING ALL CONDUIT RUNS, CONDUIT SIZES, AND POINTS OF CONNECTION FOR ARCHITECT'S REVIEW AND APPROVAL. DO NOT SUBMIT DRAWINGS TO ANY JURISDICTION PRIOR TO GAINING THIS REVIEW AND APPROVAL. ARCHITECTURE GENERAL NOTES: &AND ʫ ANGLE @ AT Ǖ CENTERLINE ΋ DIAMETER/ROUND (E)EXISTING #POUND/NUMBER +/-PLUS OR MINUS P PROPERTY LINE SQ SQUARE A/C AIR CONDITIONING A.B.ANCHOR BOLT ABV.ABOVE A.C.ASPHALTIC CONCRETE ACC. ACCESSIBLE ACOUS.ACOUSTICAL A.D.AREA DRAIN ACCESS DOOR ADD. ADDENDUM ADJ. ADJUSTABLE ADJA.ADJACENT A.F.ACCESS FLOOR A.F.F.ABOVE FINISH FLOOR AGGR.AGGREGATE A.H.U.AIR HANDLING UNIT ALUM.ALUMINUM ALT.ALTER OR ALTERNATE ANG.ANGLE ANOD.ANODIZED A.P.ACCESS PANEL APPROX.APPROXIMATE ARCH.ARCHITECTURAL ASPH.ASPHALT (PAVING) A.T.ACOUSTICAL TILE A.W.ARCHITECTURAL WOODWORK BD.BOARD BITUM.BITUMINOUS BLDG. BUILDING BLK.BLOCK BLKG.BLOCKING BM.BEAM B.O.H.BACK OF HOUSE BOT.BOTTOM BR.BEDROOM BRG.BEARING BRKT. BRACKET B.S. BOTH SIDES BSMT.BASEMENT BTWN.BETWEEN B.U.R.BUILT-UP ROOFING C CHORD/COMPACT CAB.CABINET C.B.CATCH BASIN C.B.B.CEMENTITIOUS BACKER BOARD C.C.T.V.CLOSED CIRCUIT TELEVISION C.D.CEILING DIFFUSER CEM.CEMENT CER. CERAMIC C.F./C.I.CONTRACTOR FURNISHED CONTRACTOR INSTALLED C.F.M.CUBIC FEET PER MINUTE C.G.CORNER GUARD CHAN.CHANNEL CH.W.R.CHILLED WATER RETURN CH.W.S.CHILLED WATER SUPPLY C.I.CAST IRON C.I.P.CAST-IN-PLACE CIRC.CIRCULATING C.J.CONTROL JOINT CLNG CEILING CLO.CLOSET CLR.CLEAR CM.CENTIMETER C.M.U.CONCRETE MASONRY UNIT CNTR.COUNTER C.O.CLEANOUT/CASED OPENING /CONCRETE OPENING COL.COLUMN COMM. COMMUNICATION COMP. COMPARTMENT CONC.CONCRETE COND.CONDITION CONN.CONNECTION CONSTR.CONSTRUCTION CONT.CONTINUOUS CONTR.CONTRACTOR COOR. COORDINATE CORR.CORRIDOR C.O.T.G.CLEAN OUT TO GRADE CP.CARPET C.R.CLOSET ROD C.R.M.CONCRETE RUBBLE MASONRY C.T.CERAMIC TILE CTR.CENTER CTSK.COUNTERSUNK CUST.CUSTOM C.W.COLD WATER C.W.R.COLD WATER RETURN d PENNY (NAILS) D.DEEP/DEPTH/DRYER D.A.DOUBLE ACTING DBL.DOUBLE D.D. DECK DRAIN DEPT.DEPARTMENT DET.DETAIL D.F.DRINKING FOUNTAIN DIA.DIAMETER DIAG.DIAGONAL DIM.DIMENSION DISP.DISPENSER DN. DOWN D.O.DOOR OPENING D.PTN DEMOUNTABLE PARTITION DR.DOOR DS DOWNSPOUT D.SP.DRY STANDPIPE DW. DISHWASHER DWG.DRAWING DWR.DRAWER E.EAST EA.EACH E.A.R.EXHAUST AIR REGISTER E.C.ELASTOMERIC COATING/ EXPOSED CONSTRUCTION E.F.EXHAUST FAN E.F.S.EXTERIOR FINISH SYSTEM E.G.C.B.EXTERIOR GYPSUM CEILING BOARD E.G.S.B.EXTERIOR GYPSUM SHEATHING BOARD E.I.F.S.EXTERIOR INSULATION & FINISH SYSTEM E.J.EXPANSION JOINT EL.ELEVATION ELAS.ELASTOMERIC ELEC.ELECTRICAL ELEV.ELEVATOR EMER.EMERGENCY ENCL. ENCLOSURE E.O.S.EDGE OF SLAB E.P.ELECTRICAL PANEL EQ.EQUAL EQPT.EQUIPMENT E.W.EACH WAY E.W.C.ELECTRICAL WATER COOLER EXH. EXHAUST EXP.EXPANSION EXPO.EXPOSED EXIST.EXISTING EXT.EXTERIOR F.FEMALE F.A.FIRE ALARM FAB.FABRICATE F.A.M.FLUID APPLIED MEMBRANE F.B.FLAT BAR F.C.O.FLOOR CLEAN OUT F.C.U.FAN COIL UNIT F.D.FLOOR DRAIN/ FIRE DAMPER F.E.FIRE EXTINGUISHER F.E.C.FIRE EXTINGUISHER CABINET F.F.&E.FURNITURE, FIXTURE & EQUIPMENT F.F.S.FINISH FLOOR SEPARATION F.H. FLAT HEAD F.H.C.FIRE HOSE CABINET FIN.FINISH FIXT.FIXTURE FLASH.FLASHING FLDG.FOLDING FLG.FLOORING FLR.FLOOR FLUOR.FLUORESCENT F.N.D.FEMININE NAPKIN DISPOSAL F.N.V.FEMININE NAPKIN VENDOR FND.FOUNDATION F.O.FACE OF ... F.O.C.FACE OF CONCRETE F.O.M.FACE OF MANSONRY F.O.S.FACE OF SLAB/ FACE OF STUD F.O.W.FACE OF WALL FR.FRAME F.R.G.FIBER REINFORCED GYPSUM F.R.P.FIBERGLASS REINFORCED POLYESTER F.R.T.FIRE RETARDANT TREATED WOOD FRZ.FREEZER F.S.FLOOR SINK/FULL SIZE FT.FOOT/FEET F.T.D.FACIAL TISSUE DISPENSER FTG.FOOTING FURR.FURRING/FURRED FUT.FUTURE G.GAS (PIPE) GA.GAGE GAL.GALLON GALV.GALVANIZED G.B.GRAB BAR GEN.GENERATOR G.F.I.GROUND FAULT INTERCEPTOR G.F.R.C.GLASS FIBER REINFORCED CONCRETE GL.GLASS GLU-LAM GLUED LAMINATED WOOD GND.GROUND G.P.H.GALLONS PER HOUR G.S.B.GYPSUM SHEATHING BOARD GYP.GYPSUM H.HEIGHT/HIGH H.B.HOSE BIB H.C. HOLLOW CORE HCP.HANDICAPPED HD.HEAD HDWD.HARDWOOD HDWE.HARDWARE H.M.HOLLOW METAL HORIZ.HORIZONTAL HR.HOUR H.S.HAND SINK HT.HEIGHT HTR.HEATER H.V.A.C.HEATING, VENTILATION AND AIR CONDITIONING H.W.HOT WATER H.W.R.HOT WATER RETURN I.D.INSIDE DIAMETER (DIMENSION) INCL.INCLUDED/INCLUSIVE/ INCLUDING INSUL.INSULATION INT.INTERIOR INV.INVERT JAL.JALOUSIE JAN.JANITOR J.B.JUNCTION BOX JST.JOIST JT.JOINT K.D.KNOCK DOWN KG.KILOGRAM KIT.KITCHEN KM.KILOMETER K.O.KNOCK-OUT KW KILOWATT L.LENGTH/LONG LAB.LABORATORY LAM.LAMINATE/LAMINATED LAV.LAVATORY LB.POUND L.F.LINEAL FOOT LIQ.LIQUOR LKR. LOCKER LOC.LOCATION L.P.LAMINATED PLASTIC LTG.LIGHTING LVR.LOUVER M.MALE MAT'L.MATERIAL MAX.MAXIMUM M.B.MACHINE BOLT M.C.MEDICINE CABINET MECH.MECHANICAL MEMB.MEMBRANE MET.METAL MFR.MANUFACTURER MH.MANHOLE MIN.MINIMUM MIR.MIRROR MISC.MISCELLANEOUS MLDG.MOULDING MM.MILLIMETER M.O.MASONRY OPENING MOD.MODULAR M.R.MOISTURE RESISTANT MTD.MOUNTED MTG.MOUNTING N.NORTH N.I.C.NOT IN CONTRACT N.L.NIGHT LIGHT NO.NUMBER NOM.NOMINAL N.S.NO SCALE N.T.S.NOT TO SCALE O. OVER O.C.ON CENTER OA.OVERALL O.A.G.OUTSIDE AIR GRILLE OBS.OBSCURE O.D.OUTSIDE DIAMETER (DIMENSION) O.F./C.I.OWNER FURNISHED/ CONTRACTOR INSTALLED OFD.OVERFLOW DRAIN OFF. OFFICE O.F./O.I.OWNER FURNISHED/ OWNER INSTALLED OPNG.OPENING OPP.OPPOSITE OPQ.OPAQUE OPR.OPERABLE OVHD.OVERHEAD PASS.PASSAGE P.C.POST CONTRACT P.C.A.POST CONTRACT ARCHITECTURAL PC.PIECE P.D.PLANTER DRAIN PERIM.PERIMETER PERP.PERPENDICULAR PH.PENTHOUSE P.I.P.POURED-IN-PLACE PL.PLATE PLAM.PLASTIC LAMINATE PLAS.PLASTER PLBG.PLUMBING PLYWD.PLYWOOD PNL.PANEL PR.PAIR P.R.B.P.PRESSURE REDUCING BACK FLOW PREVENTER PRCST.PRECAST PREFAB.PREFABRICATED PREP.PREPARATION PROP.PROPERTY P.R.V.PRESSURE RELIEF VALVE P.S.F.POUNDS PER SQUARE FOOT PT.PAINT/POINT P.T.D.PAPER TOWEL DISPENSER P.T.D.R.PAPER TOWEL DISPENSER & RECEPTACLE PTN.PARTITION P.T.R.PAPER TOWEL RECEPTACLE PVC POLY VINYL CHLORIDE Q.T.QUARRY TILE R.RISER RAD.RADIUS R.B.RESILIENT BASE RB.HK.ROBE HOOK R.C.P.REFLECTED CEILING PLAN R.D. ROOF DRAIN REBAR REINFORCING BAR REF.REFERENCE/REFER REFL.REFLECTOR REFR.REFRIGERATOR REINF.REINFORCED/REINFORCING REQ.REQUIRED RESIL.RESILIENT REST.RESTROOM REV.REVISED/REVISION R.F. RESILIENT FLOORING RFG. ROOFING RGTR. REGISTER R.H. ROUND HEAD RLG. RAILING RM. ROOM R.O. ROUGH OPENING R.W.R. RECESSED WASTE RECEPTACLE RWD. REDWOOD R.W.L. RAIN WATER LEADER S. SOUTH S.A. SINGLE ACTING S.C. SOLID CORE SC. SCALE SCHED. SCHEDULE SCP. SCUPPER S.C.R. SHOWER CURTAIN ROD S.D. SMOKE DETECTOR SECT. SECTION S.F. SQUARE FEET SH. SHELF SHR. SHOWER SHT. SHEET SHTG. SHEATHING SIM. SIMILAR SL. SLOPE SLDG. SLIDING SLNT. SEALANT S.M. SQUARE METER S.MH. SEWER MANHOLE S.N.D. SANITARY NAPKIN DISPENSER S.N.R. SANITARY NAPKIN RECEPTACLE S.P. SOLID PLASTIC SPEC. SPECIFICATIONS SPKR. SPEAKER SPRK. SPRINKLER SQ. SQUARE S.SK. SERVICE SINK S.STL. STAINLESS STEEL ST. STONE STA. STATION STD. STANDARD STL. STEEL STOR. STORAGE STRUCT. STRUCTURE/STRUCTURAL SURR. SURROUND SUSP. SUSPEND/SUSPENDED SVC. SERVICE SW. SWITCH SYM. SYMMETRICAL SYS. SYSTEM T. TREAD T&G TONGUE AND GROOVE T./S TUB/SHOWER TACKBD TACKBOARD T.B. TOWEL BAR T.D. TRENCH DRAIN TEL. TELEPHONE TEMP. TEMPERED/TEMPORARY TER. TERRAZZO TFE TOP OF FOOTING TFMR. TRANSFORMER THK. THICK/THICKNESS THR. THRESHOLD TLT. TOILET T.O. TOP OF ... T.O.C. TOP OF CURB T.O.F. TOP OF FLOOR T.O.P. TOP OF PARAPET TOP OF PAVEMENT T.P.B. TELEPHONE POWER BOARD T.P.D. TOILET PAPER DISPENSER T.P.H. TOILET PAPER HOLDER TOS TOP OF STEEL TPE TOP OF PIER TRAN. TRANSITION TRANS. TRANSPARENT TSE TOP OF SLAB T.S. TUBE STEEL T.S.C.D. TOILET SEAT COVER DISPENSER T.SH. TOWEL SHELF TV. TELEVISION TWE TOP OF WALL TYP. TYPICAL UC. UNDERCUT U.L. UNDERWRITERS LABORATORIES, INC. UNF. UNFINISHED U.N.O. UNLESS NOTED OTHERWISE U.P. UPHOLSTERED PANELS UR. URINAL VAL. VALANCE VAR. VARIES V.C.T. VINYL COMPOSITION TILE VERT. VERTICAL VEST. VESTIBULE VLV. VALVE VOL. VOLUME V.P. VENEER PLASTER V.T.R. VENT THROUGH ROOF W. WEST/WIDTH/WIDE/WASHER W/ WITH W/O WITHOUT W.C. WATER CLOSET WD. WALLCOVERING WD.P. WOOD PANELING WDW. WINDOW W.GL. WIRE GLASS W.H. WATER HEATER WARNOCK HERSEY W.O. WHERE OCCURS/ WINDOW OPENING WP. WATERPROOF WP.M. WATERPROOF MEMBRANE W.S. WOOD SCREWS W.R. WATER RESISTANT WRB. WARDROBE WSCT. WAINSCOT W.S.P. WET STAND PIPE WT. WEIGHT W.W.F. WELDED WIRE FABRIC R SEH Project Checked By Drawn By Project Status Issue Date This drawing is an instrument of service and shall remain the property of Short Elliott Hendrickson, Inc. (SEH). This drawing, concepts and ideas contained herein shall not be used, reproduced, revised, or retained without the express written approval of SEH. Submission or distribution of this drawing to meet official or regulatory requirements or for purposes in connection with the project is not be construed as publication in derogation of any of the rights of SEH. N O T FO R C O N S TR U C TIO N Short Elliott Hendrickson, Inc.All Rights ReservedCOPYRIGHT © 2023PROJECT OWNER ROARING FORK TRANSPORTATION AUTHORITY 0051 SEVICE CENTER DRIVE ASPEN, COLORADO 81611 5/3/2023 12:21:15 PMGENERAL INFORMATION AND ABBREVIATIONSRUBEY PARK ELECTRIC CHARGERASPEN, COLORADO81611165526 MtN & AJ MtNROARING FORK TRANSIT AUTHORITY30% DESIGN DOCUMENTS 05/03/2023 A001 ABBREVIATIONS MATERIAL SYMBOLS CALLOUT SYMBOLS GENERAL NOTES OPENING SYMBOLS GENERAL SYMBOLS REVISION SCHEDULE REV. # DESCRIPTION DATE 133 3523(57</,1(3523(57</,1(COCO D W E E GV GV GVGVGVGVCOCOCO COCOCOCOCO COCOCOCOCO COCOCOCO CB CB CB CB CB CB CB CB CBCB CBCBCB: 9(67,%8/( : 5(675220 : 5(675220 : /281*( : 2)),&( : &8672',$/6725$*( : 75$6+: 0(&+ : 6725$*( : &200 ( 05(675220 ( :5(675220 ( &867  :$,7,1*  7,&.(7,1)2  .,7&+(1(77(  5(675220  6(59,&(                     PROTECT TREE DURING CONSTRUCTION 02.05 02.0302.05 02.02 02.07 02.05 02.05 02.03 02.0302.04 02.0402.02 02.02 02.0102.01 02.06 1/16" = 1'-0"A071 1 OVERALL PLAN - DEMOLITION R SEH Project Checked By Drawn By Project Status Issue Date This drawing is an instrument of service and shall remain the property of Short Elliott Hendrickson, Inc. (SEH). This drawing, concepts and ideas contained herein shall not be used, reproduced, revised, or retained without the express written approval of SEH. Submission or distribution of this drawing to meet official or regulatory requirements or for purposes in connection with the project is not be construed as publication in derogation of any of the rights of SEH. N O T FO R C O N S TR U C TIO N Short Elliott Hendrickson, Inc.All Rights ReservedCOPYRIGHT © 2023PROJECT OWNER ROARING FORK TRANSPORTATION AUTHORITY 0051 SEVICE CENTER DRIVE ASPEN, COLORADO 81611 5/3/2023 12:21:17 PMOVERALL DEMOLITION PLANRUBEY PARK ELECTRIC CHARGERASPEN, COLORADO81611165526 MtN & AJ MtNROARING FORK TRANSIT AUTHORITY30% DESIGN DOCUMENTS 05/03/2023 A071352-(&7 1257+1   REVISION SCHEDULE REV. # DESCRIPTION DATE KEYNOTE LEGEND 02.01 DEMO SEGEMENT OF CURB AND GUTTER & ALLEY TRENCH TO TIE INTO EXISTING PRIMARY ELECTRICAL CONDUITS RE: CIVIL 02.02 DEMO AND REPLACE CURB INLETS RE: CIVIL 02.03 DEMO PART OF EXISTING RE: CIVIL 02.04 DEMO CURB AND GUTTER RE: CIVIL 02.05 DEMO EXISTING TREE RE: LANDSCAPE 02.06 DEMO AND REPLACE DRAINAGE PIPE RE: CIVIL 02.07 DEMO AND RESTORE OVERFLOW CUTOFF WEIR AND GRADES PER 2016 AS-BUILT. THE WEIR CAN BE ADJUSTED EAST OR WEST TO ACCOMODATE THE ELECTRICAL EQUIPMENT RE: CIVIL 134 3523(57</,1(3523(57</,1(5()(55()(5COCO D W E E GV GV GVGVCOCOCO COCOCOCOCO COCOCOCOCO COCOCOCO CB CB CB CB CB CB CB CB CBCB CBCBCB: 9(67,%8/( : 5(675220 : 5(675220 : /281*( : 2)),&( : &8672',$/6725$*( : 75$6+: 0(&+ : 6725$*( : &200 ( 05(675220 ( :5(675220 ( &867  :$,7,1*  7,&.(7,1)2  .,7&+(1(77(  5(675220  6(59,&(                     26.07 1 0 '-6 " 26.0326.0226.01 26.04 00.01 00.01 26.07 R SEH Project Checked By Drawn By Project Status Issue Date This drawing is an instrument of service and shall remain the property of Short Elliott Hendrickson, Inc. (SEH). This drawing, concepts and ideas contained herein shall not be used, reproduced, revised, or retained without the express written approval of SEH. Submission or distribution of this drawing to meet official or regulatory requirements or for purposes in connection with the project is not be construed as publication in derogation of any of the rights of SEH. N O T FO R C O N S TR U C TIO N Short Elliott Hendrickson, Inc.All Rights ReservedCOPYRIGHT © 2023PROJECT OWNER ROARING FORK TRANSPORTATION AUTHORITY 0051 SEVICE CENTER DRIVE ASPEN, COLORADO 81611 5/3/2023 12:21:34 PMOVERALL PLANRUBEY PARK ELECTRIC CHARGERASPEN, COLORADO81611165526 MtN & AJ MtNROARING FORK TRANSIT AUTHORITY30% DESIGN DOCUMENTS 05/03/2023 A111 1/16" = 1'-0"A111 1 OVERALL PLAN 352-(&7 1257+1   KEYNOTE LEGEND 00.01 POTENTIAL FUTURE OVERHEAD CHANGING STATIONS 26.01 277/480v TRANSFORMER, RE: ELECTRICAL 26.02 SWITCHGEAR, PAINTED TO MATCH TRANSFORMER COLOR - GREEN, RE: ELECTRICAL 26.03 (3) ABB POWER CABINET, PAINTED TO MATCH TRANSFORMER COLOR - GREEN, RE: ELECTRICAL 26.04 ABB HVC 450PD OVERHEAD CHARGER, RE: ELECTRICAL 26.07 EXISTING TRANSFORMER, RE: ELECTRICAL REVISION SCHEDULE REV. # DESCRIPTION DATE 135 E  $  $  $  $  $  $  $  $3'-0"6 '-0 " 2 6 .0 1 10'-0"03.04 03.03 4'-0"10'-0"10'-0"4'-0"03.05 03.05 2'-6 1/2"26.03 26.02 03.0503.05 26.04 A403 2 3 '-0 " 3 '-0 " 1 1 '-6 1 /4 "1'-8"30.01 30.01 03.04 5'-2"03.05 1 '-6 "1 '-6 "6"6"6 '-0 " 7 ' - 0 "5' - 2"4 ' - 1 " MATCH EXISTING CURB HEIGHT & FLOWLINE VIF GFL: 7929.05' CONTROL POINT: TOP OF SLAB TO BE 4" ABOVE DRIVE AISLE EXISTING GRADE AT SAWCUT LINE 2 5 '-0 " 8'-0"5'-0" 03.03 CONTROL POINT: TOP OF SLAB TO BE 4" ABOVE DRIVE AISLE EXISTING GRADE AT SAWCUT LINE R SEH Project Checked By Drawn By Project Status Issue Date This drawing is an instrument of service and shall remain the property of Short Elliott Hendrickson, Inc. (SEH). This drawing, concepts and ideas contained herein shall not be used, reproduced, revised, or retained without the express written approval of SEH. Submission or distribution of this drawing to meet official or regulatory requirements or for purposes in connection with the project is not be construed as publication in derogation of any of the rights of SEH. N O T FO R C O N S TR U C TIO N Short Elliott Hendrickson, Inc.All Rights ReservedCOPYRIGHT © 2023PROJECT OWNER ROARING FORK TRANSPORTATION AUTHORITY 0051 SEVICE CENTER DRIVE ASPEN, COLORADO 81611 5/3/2023 12:21:36 PMENLARGED PLANSRUBEY PARK ELECTRIC CHARGERASPEN, COLORADO81611165526 MtN & AJ MtNROARING FORK TRANSIT AUTHORITY30% DESIGN DOCUMENTS 05/03/2023 A400 KEYNOTE LEGEND 03.03 CONCRETE CURB & GUTTER - TYPE 2 (SPECIAL II-B) (MATCH EXISITNG ASPHALT SAW CUT LINE) RE: CIVIL 03.04 CONCRETE CURB & GUTTER - TYPE 2 (SECTION I-B) (MATCH EXISITNG ASPHALT SAW CUT LINE) RE: CIVIL 03.05 EXISTING CURB & GUTTER TO REMAIN, RE: CIVIL 26.01 277/480v TRANSFORMER, RE: ELECTRICAL 26.02 SWITCHGEAR, PAINTED TO MATCH TRANSFORMER COLOR - GREEN, RE: ELECTRICAL 26.03 (3) ABB POWER CABINET, PAINTED TO MATCH TRANSFORMER COLOR - GREEN, RE: ELECTRICAL 26.04 ABB HVC 450PD OVERHEAD CHARGER, RE: ELECTRICAL 30.01 HOT MIX ASPHALT PATCH, MATCH EXISTING GRADE TO DRAIN 1/4" = 1'-0"A400 2 ENLARGED - BUS CHARGING STATION PLAN    REVISION SCHEDULE REV. # DESCRIPTION DATE 136 E  $  $  $  $ 32.03 32.02 03.05 A403 2 22.01 26.12 26.10 26.08 26.09 26.11 03.05 03.03 32.02 32.03 26.1303.0503.0403.05 7 '-0 "7'-0"1 0 '-0 "12'-0"22.01 30.01 30.01 03.04 03.05 22.01 R SEH Project Checked By Drawn By Project Status Issue Date This drawing is an instrument of service and shall remain the property of Short Elliott Hendrickson, Inc. (SEH). This drawing, concepts and ideas contained herein shall not be used, reproduced, revised, or retained without the express written approval of SEH. Submission or distribution of this drawing to meet official or regulatory requirements or for purposes in connection with the project is not be construed as publication in derogation of any of the rights of SEH. N O T FO R C O N S TR U C TIO N Short Elliott Hendrickson, Inc.All Rights ReservedCOPYRIGHT © 2023PROJECT OWNER ROARING FORK TRANSPORTATION AUTHORITY 0051 SEVICE CENTER DRIVE ASPEN, COLORADO 81611 5/3/2023 12:21:38 PMENLARGED PLANSRUBEY PARK ELECTRIC CHARGERASPEN, COLORADO81611165526 MtN & AJ MtNROARING FORK TRANSIT AUTHORITY30% DESIGN DOCUMENTS 05/03/2023 A401 1/4" = 1'-0"A401 1 ENLARGED - BUS CHARGING STATION FOUNDATION PLAN KEYNOTE LEGEND 03.03 CONCRETE CURB & GUTTER - TYPE 2 (SPECIAL II-B) (MATCH EXISITNG ASPHALT SAW CUT LINE) RE: CIVIL 03.04 CONCRETE CURB & GUTTER - TYPE 2 (SECTION I-B) (MATCH EXISITNG ASPHALT SAW CUT LINE) RE: CIVIL 03.05 EXISTING CURB & GUTTER TO REMAIN, RE: CIVIL 22.01 EXISTING SEWER PIPE, RE: CIVIL 26.08 INTERCEPT EXISTING CONDUIT. INSTALL 90 DEGREE SWEEP FROM NEW CONDUIT TO EXISTING 4 INCH CONDUIT. PULL NEW PRIMARY CABLE FROM VAULT ON WEST SIDE OF RAIN-GARDEN INTO NEW TRANSFORMER, RE: ELECTRICAL 26.09 INTERCEPT EXISTING CONDUIT. INSTALL 90 DEGREE SWEEP FROM NEW CONDUIT TO EXISTING 4 INCH CONDUIT. PULL NEW PRIMARY CABLE FROM EXISTING TRANSFORMER TO NEW TRANSFORMER, RE: ELECTRICAL 26.10 EXISTING PRIMARY CABLE LINE BURIED AT APPROVIMATELY 4FT BELWO ASPHALT SURFACE, RE: ELECTRICAL 26.11 EXISTING PRIMARY VAULT LOCATED WEST OF RAIN-GARDEN, RE: ELECTRICAL 26.12 EXISTING TRANSFORMER, RE: ELECTRICAL 26.13 INSTALL NEW CONDUIT. RUN ETHERNET TO RFTA OWNED EQUIPMENT IN BUILDING. COORDINATE WITH RFTA IT FOR DETAILS. COORDINATE WITH ABB FOR HARDWIRED SOLUTION. IF NOT FEASIBLE TO MAINTAIN HARDWIRED CONNECTIVITY, THEN CELLULAR MAY BE INSTALLED IN COORDINATION WITH RFTA IT FOR VPN SOLITIONS, RE: ELECTRICAL 30.01 HOT MIX ASPHALT PATCH, MATCH EXISTING GRADE TO DRAIN 32.02 NEW DRAIN PIPE, RE: CIVIL 32.03 EXISTING DRAIN PIPE TO REMAIN, RE: CIVIL    REVISION SCHEDULE REV. # DESCRIPTION DATE 137  $ 26.02 VARIES RE: CIVILTOP OF TYPE 2 (SPECIAL II-B) CURB TO FOLLOW FLOWLINE OFFSET EXISTING DRIVE AISLE SAWCUT LINE RE: PLAN FOR LOCATION OF TOP OF SLAB & BACK OF CURB CONTROL POINT 1'-0" 03.01 RE: CIVILGN00  $ 26.01 26.05 RE: CIVIL05.01 TOP OF TYPE 2 (SPECIAL II-B) CURB TO FOLLOW FLOWLINE OFFSET EXISTING DRIVE AISLE SAWCUT LINE 03.03EXISTING DRIVE AISLE SAWCUT LINE 03.04 RE: PLAN FOR LOCATION OF TOP OF SLAB & BACK OF CURB CONTROL POINT03.01VARIES RE: CIVILGN00  $  $  $  $ 26.01 26.02 26.03 26.04 GN00 26.05 03.01VARIE S RE:CIVILGN00 GN00  $ 26.03 VARIES RE: CIVILRE: CIVILTOP OF TYPE 2 (SPECIAL II-B) CURB TO FOLLOW FLOWLINE OFFSET EXISTING DRIVE AISLE SAWCUT LINE RE: PLAN FOR LOCATION OF TOP OF SLAB & BACK OF CURB CONTROL POINT 03.01 GN00 R SEH Project Checked By Drawn By Project Status Issue Date This drawing is an instrument of service and shall remain the property of Short Elliott Hendrickson, Inc. (SEH). This drawing, concepts and ideas contained herein shall not be used, reproduced, revised, or retained without the express written approval of SEH. Submission or distribution of this drawing to meet official or regulatory requirements or for purposes in connection with the project is not be construed as publication in derogation of any of the rights of SEH. N O T FO R C O N S TR U C TIO N Short Elliott Hendrickson, Inc.All Rights ReservedCOPYRIGHT © 2023PROJECT OWNER ROARING FORK TRANSPORTATION AUTHORITY 0051 SEVICE CENTER DRIVE ASPEN, COLORADO 81611 5/3/2023 12:21:48 PMENLARGED SECTIONSRUBEY PARK ELECTRIC CHARGERASPEN, COLORADO81611165526 MtN & AJ MtNROARING FORK TRANSIT AUTHORITY30% DESIGN DOCUMENTS 05/03/2023 A402    3/8" = 1'-0"A402 3 SECTION - SWITCHGEAR N/S 3/8" = 1'-0"A402 2 SECTION - TRANSFORMER VAULT NS 3/8" = 1'-0"A402 1 SECTION - OVERHEAD BUS CHARGING STATION EW KEYNOTE LEGEND 03.01 8" CONCRETE FLAT SLAB W/ REIFORCEMENT, RE: STRUCTURAL 03.03 CONCRETE CURB & GUTTER - TYPE 2 (SPECIAL II-B) (MATCH EXISITNG ASPHALT SAW CUT LINE) RE: CIVIL 03.04 CONCRETE CURB & GUTTER - TYPE 2 (SECTION I-B) (MATCH EXISITNG ASPHALT SAW CUT LINE) RE: CIVIL 05.01 CONCRETE FILLED STEEL BOLLARD, SURFACE MOUNTED W/ EPOXIED ANCHORS. PAINTED SAFETY YELLOW, RE: STRUCTURAL 26.01 277/480v TRANSFORMER, RE: ELECTRICAL 26.02 SWITCHGEAR, PAINTED TO MATCH TRANSFORMER COLOR - GREEN, RE: ELECTRICAL 26.03 (3) ABB POWER CABINET, PAINTED TO MATCH TRANSFORMER COLOR - GREEN, RE: ELECTRICAL 26.04 ABB HVC 450PD OVERHEAD CHARGER, RE: ELECTRICAL 26.05 ELECTRICAL VAULT W/ BASE AND LID, RE: ELECTRICAL GN00 SEE TYPICAL BIO RETENTION CELL RE: CIVIL 3/8" = 1'-0"A402 4 SECTION - POWER CABINETS N/S REVISION SCHEDULE REV. # DESCRIPTION DATE 138  $ 26.04 05.01130.4"14.6"X=Y+50.20" Ymin = 35.43" Ymax = 70.87"Y50.2" CLCL 37.0"37.0" 14.0"26.03218.4"211.7"12'-0" MIN 1'-8"VARIES RE:CIVILGN00 TOP OF TYPE 2 CURB TO FOLLOW FLOWLINE OFFSET TOP OF SLAB TO BE 4" ABOVE DRIVE AISLE EXISTING GRADE AT SAWCUT LINE, RE: PLANS RE: CIVIL98.5"55.1" 92.5" INVERTER BOX BATTERIES (ESS) SIEMENS CHARGE RAILS WHEEL CTR TO GROUND (UNLOADED BUS) CL 126.0" 26.01 19.0"130.4"26.04 05.01 POLE POSITION GENERAL NOTES: 1. IN GENERAL: · NO TREES (LEAVES) CLOSE TO THE CHARGE POLE. · THE MINIMAL FREE SPACE AT THE FRONT OF THE MAST BOOM IS 7.87 INCH. · THE TOTAL FREE SPACE AT THE FRONT OF THE CHARGE POLE DEPENDING ON THE BUS DIMENSIONS. · HEIGHT OF THE PANTOGRAPH IN STAND-BY MODE DEPENDS ON ROAD- AND SIDEWAY POSITION, · AND POSITION ON THE MAST BOOM. 181.69 INCH CAN BE USED AS AN AVERAGE. 2. POLE POSITION IN RELATION TO THE BUS IT IS IMPORTANT THAT THE POLE HAS THE GOOD POSITION IN RELATION WITH THE BUS, SO THAT THE PANTOGRAPH CAN MAKE PHYSICAL CONTACT WITH THE CHARGE INTERFACE RAILS ON THE ROOF OF THE BUS. IN GENERAL, THE BUS HAS A CERTAIN FREEDOM DEGREE TO POSITION UNDER THE PANTOGRAPH: · Z-AXIS = 23.62 (±11.81) INCH -9 LONGITUDINAL AXIS; · Y-AXIS = 19.69 (±9.84) INCH TRANSVERSAL AXIS; · X-AXIS = 45.28 INCH VERTICAL AXIS; · WHEN THE ROAD IS HORIZONTAL AND THE TOP OF ROAD (TOR) IS FIAT (NO WEAR); · COMPENSATION OF ANGLES: X-AXIS 3.50, Z-AXIS 2.50. CHARGE RAILS ABOVE POWER POLE ABOVE SIEMENS CHARGE RAILS R SEH Project Checked By Drawn By Project Status Issue Date This drawing is an instrument of service and shall remain the property of Short Elliott Hendrickson, Inc. (SEH). This drawing, concepts and ideas contained herein shall not be used, reproduced, revised, or retained without the express written approval of SEH. Submission or distribution of this drawing to meet official or regulatory requirements or for purposes in connection with the project is not be construed as publication in derogation of any of the rights of SEH. N O T FO R C O N S TR U C TIO N Short Elliott Hendrickson, Inc.All Rights ReservedCOPYRIGHT © 2023PROJECT OWNER ROARING FORK TRANSPORTATION AUTHORITY 0051 SEVICE CENTER DRIVE ASPEN, COLORADO 81611 5/3/2023 12:22:53 PMENLARGED SECTIONSRUBEY PARK ELECTRIC CHARGERASPEN, COLORADO81611165526 MtN & AJ MtNROARING FORK TRANSIT AUTHORITY30% DESIGN DOCUMENTS 05/03/2023 A4033/8" = 1'-0"A403 1 SECTION - BUS CHARGING STATION    KEYNOTE LEGEND 05.01 CONCRETE FILLED STEEL BOLLARD, SURFACE MOUNTED W/ EPOXIED ANCHORS. PAINTED SAFETY YELLOW, RE: STRUCTURAL 26.01 277/480v TRANSFORMER, RE: ELECTRICAL 26.03 (3) ABB POWER CABINET, PAINTED TO MATCH TRANSFORMER COLOR - GREEN, RE: ELECTRICAL 26.04 ABB HVC 450PD OVERHEAD CHARGER, RE: ELECTRICAL GN00 SEE TYPICAL BIO RETENTION CELL RE: CIVIL 3/8" = 1'-0"A403 2 ELEVATION - BUS CHARGING STATION NOT TO SCALEA403 3 ENLARGED PLAN - BUS TOP CHARGER REVISION SCHEDULE REV. # DESCRIPTION DATE 139 (/(&75,&$//(*(1' '83/(;5(&(37$&/( '28%/('83/(;5(&(37$&/( 63(&,$/5(&(37$&/( 63(&,$/5(&(37$&/()/22502817(' -81&7,21%2;:$//25&(,/,1*02817(' ',6&211(&76:7,&+ 121)86(' ',6&211(&76:,7&+ )86(' (/(&75,&$/3$1(/%2$5'2527+(5 &$%,1(7$6127(' &211(&7,217235(:,5('(48,30(17 &21'8,7(;326(' &21'8,77851,1*83 &21'8,7&$33(' '(6&5,37,216<0%2/'(6&5,37,216<0%2/ - 0 7 02725 &21'8,7&21&($/(' *5281'%$5 75$16)250(5 5(&(66(')/825(6&(17/80,1$,5(/$< ,1*5,'&(,/,1*/2:(5&$6(6&5,37 ,1',&$7(66:,7&+,1*833(5&$6( ,1',&$7(6/80,1$,5(7<3( 5(&(66(')/825(6&(17/80,1$,5()/$1*(' 685)$&(02817('/80,1$,5( 685)$&(253(1'$1702817('675,3 685)$&(02817(':$///80,1$,5( 3(1'$1702817('/,1($5/80,1$,5( 5(&(66('',5(&7,1',5(&7/80,1$,5( 685)$&(02817('&(,/,1*/80,1$,5( 685)$&(02817(':$///80,1$,5( 3(1'$1702817('/80,1$,5( (0(5*(1&</,*+7,1*81,7 (;,7/,*+7$552:6$6,1',&$7(' )$&(6,1',&$7('%<6+$',1* 81'(5&$%,1(7/,*+7,1* 32/(02817('/80,1$,5( %2//$5' 6+$',1*,1',&$7(6&211(&7,2172 (0(5*(1&<6<67(0/6,1',&$7(/,)( 6$)(7<&,5&8,7 6,1*/(32/(6:,7&+ 68%6&5,37'(127(6 6:,7&+,1* .(<23(5$7('6:,7&+ 0$18$/6:,7&++256(32:(55$7( ',00(56:,7&+ /2:92/7$*(6:,7&+ 7+(50$/29(5/2$'6:,7&+ 3+272&(// 7,0(&/2&. 6D 6. 60 6' 6/9 672 $%%5(9,$7,216/(*(1' $03(5(6 $%29(),1,6+(')/225 $%29(),1,6+('*5$'( $1181&,$725 $%29(5$,6(')/225 $,56$03/,1*602.('(7(&7,21 $8720$7,&75$16)(56:,7&+ %(/2:),1,6+('*5$'( 0,1,080 0$,1/8*621/< 0$18$/75$16)(56:,7&+ 1250$//<&/26(' 1,*+7/,*+7 1250$//<23(1 127726&$/( &21'8,7 &$%/(7(/(9,6,21 &,5&8,7%5($.(5 &/26('&,5&8,77(/(9,6,21 (;,67,1* (0(5*(1&< (;3/26,213522) (0(5*(1&<32:(52)) (/(&75,&:$7(5&22/(5 75$16)250(5 :($7+(53522) 9$5,$%/()5(48(1&<'5,9( 92/76 81,17(55837$%/(32:(5 6833/< 81/(6627+(5:,6(127(' 81'(5*5281' 81'(5)/225 7<3,&$/ 75$16,(1792/7$*(685*(68335(66(5 7$03(53522) 38//%2; 2:1(5)851,6+('2:1(5,167$//(' 2:1(5)851,6+('&2175$&725,167$//(' 21&(17(5 127,1&2175$&7 $ ',6&211(&76:,7&+ ',6&211(&76:,7&+)86(' &,5&8,7%5($.(5/ /21*7,0(3,&.83 6 6+2577,0(3,&.83, ,167$1(28675,3 * *5281')$8/7 3$1(/%2$5'$ (48,30(17(1&/2685( 0(7(5 6(59,&((175$1&(75$16)250(5 327(17,$/75$16)250(5 &855(1775$16)250(5 67(3'2:175$16)250(5,1',&$7(6.9$ *5281' )86( '(6&5,37,216<0%2/ 7 $ 0 3& (:& (32 (3 (0 ( &&79 &% &$79 & %)* $76 $66' $5) $11 $)* $)) $ ;)05 :3 9)' 9 836 821 8* 8) 7<3 7966 73 3% 2)2, 2)&, 2& 176 12 1/ 1,& 1& 076 0/2 0,1 6+$',1*,1',&$7(6(0(5*(1&<6<67(0 7(;7,1',&$7(63$1(/$1'&,5&8,7 '(6,*1$7,21 2&&83$1&<6(1625 &(,/,1*02817(' ,5 ,1)5$5('86 8/75$621,&'7 '8$/ 7(&+12/2*< ),5($/$50 *5281' *5281')$8/7,17(55837,1* +$1'2))$8720$7,& ,62/$7('*5281' 0$;,080 0$,1&,5&8,7%5($.(5 02725&21752/&(17(5 0$,1',675,%87,21&(17(50'& 0&& 0&% 0$; ,* +2$ *), * )$ /6,* 7& 2& 25 /6 0+ 02817,1*+(,*+70+ 2&2&&83$1&<6(1625 :$//02817(' ,5 ,1)5$5('86 8/75$621,&'7 '8$/ 7(&+12/2*< 7232)&$%,1(7 7232)&$%,1(7    25%(/2:&(,/,1*:+,&+(9(5,6/2:(5   821   821   821   821   821   821   8217<3,&$/ &(,/,1*25+,*+(5 7232)&$%,1(7 7<3,&$/ &(,/,1*   127(6  ),1,6+(')/225   821127($//'(9,&(6,1',&$7('72%( ,167$//('$7',))(5(1702817,1* +(,*+76$1'/2&$7(':,7+,121( 678'63$&()520($&+27+(5 6+$//$/,*19(57,&$//<217+( 6$0(6,'(2)7+(678':+(5(:$// 02817('7(/(3+21(62&&8529(5 /,*+76:,7&+(692/80(&21752/6 (7&2))6(721(678'63$&( +(,*+766+2:1$5(7<3,&$/72&(17(5/,1(2)%2;81/(66127('27+(5:,6( :+(5((9(5'(9,&(6$5(,1',&$7('72%($%29('2256'(9,&(6+$//%(&(17(5('%(7:((1723 2)'22575,0$1'&(,/,1*/,1( 02817,1*+(,*+766+2:121$5&+,7(&785$/(/(9$7,2166+$//*29(5129(57+26(6+2:1$%29( %277202)'(9,&( : *), *= 0 3%33 &21752/3$1(/6 723 6 723 6 3& & & % % )$$ & & 0'& & ( 0' & & )$&3 6 &5 '&%(6 9 7 7& 660 , 0 126&$/( ) 7<3,&$/'(9,&(02817,1*+(,*+76127(6  :,'7+$65(48,5(' 6((63(&,),&$7,216)25$'',7,21$/1$0(3/$7(,1)250$7,21 5(:25'1$0(3/$7()25),(/'&21',7,216 $035$7,1*6+$//,1',&$7(%865$7,1* 6&$/()8// 3$1(//$ $,& 9‘:$ )(')5200'& 68%',675,%87,21&(17(5 $1'%5$1&+3$1(/%2$5' 1$0(3/$7('(7$,/ 3+$ %/$&.3+% 5('3+& %/8( *5281' *5((1 :,'7+$65(48,5('  127(6 6((63(&,),&$7,216)25$'',7,21$/1$0(3/$7(,1)250$7,21 5(:25'1$0(3/$7()25),(/'&21',7,216 +36+$//,1',&$7(+256(32:(5 87,/,=$7,21(48,30(17 1$0(3/$7('(7$,/ &+$5*(67$7,21 9‘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‹352-(&72:1(5 52$5,1*)25. 75$163257$7,21$87+25,7< 6(9,&(&(17(5'5,9( $63(1&2/25$'2 '(6,*1'2&80(176  &$% &$%30(/(&75,&$//(*(1' 6&+('8/(6$1''(7$,/658%(<3$5.(/(&75,&&+$5*(5$63(1&2/25$'252$5,1*)25.75$163257$7,21$87+25,7<( *(1(5$/127(6                  :25.,1&/8'(',17+(&2175$&7,6'(127(',1%2/'(;,67,1*&21',7,216725(0$,1$5('(127(' /,*+7/<81/(66127('27+(5:,6( $//(/(&75,&$/:25.3(5)250('81'(57+,6&2175$&76+$//&21)250:,7+/$7(67(',7,2162)7+( 1$7,21$/(/(&75,&$/&2'(81,)250%8,/',1*&2'(25,17(51$7,21$/%8,/',1*&2'(/2&$/%8,/',1* $1'),5('(3$570(175(48,5(0(176 7+((/(&75,&$/'5$:,1*6$5(',$*5$00$7,&$1',1',&$7(7+(*(1(5$/$55$1*(0(172)(/(&75,&$/ :25./2&$7,216$5($3352;,0$7($1'6+$//%(68%-(&7720,12502',),&$7,216$6',5(&7('%<7+( *(1(5$/&2175$&725$1'2:1(55(35(6(17$7,9(6(/(&75,&$/&2175$&7256+$//%(5(63216,%/( )257+((;$&7),77,1*2)$//0$7(5,$/6(48,30(17(7&,17+(%8,/',1*$//',0(16,2166+$//%( 9(5,),('217+(-2%(/(&75,&$/&2175$&7256+$//&87&+$11(/&+$6($1'25'5,//:$//6 3$57,7,216&(,/,1*62527+(5685)$&(6$65(48,5(')25,167$//$7,216833257$1&+25$*((7& 2):25.1202',),&$7,216727+()/225668&+$6&877,1*'5,//,1*25&25,1*$5($//2:('7+( *(1(5$/&2175$&7256+$//%(5(63216,%/()257+(68%6(48(173$7&+,1*:25. $'(7$,/(':5,77(10(7+2'2)352&('85(,65(48,5(':+(1$&216758&7,21$&7,9,7<25$1287$*( $))(&767+(6$)(7<2)2&&83$1767(/(3+21('$7$),5($/$50(48,30(1725&20321(1762)$1< 6<67(0:+,&+683325767+,6(48,30(1725(66(17,$//<$))(&767+(%8,/',1*0$1$*(0(17 23(5$7,216256(&85,7<&225',1$7(5(48,5(0(176:,7+2:1(56((63(&,),&$7,216)25$'',7,21$/ ,1)250$7,21 35,257268%0,77,1*%,'67+((/(&75,&$/&2175$&7256+$//9,6,77+(6,7(729(5,)<(;,67,1* (/(&75,&$/(48,30(17&21',7,21668%0,66,212)$%,'352326$/:,//%(&216758('$6(9,'(1&( 7+$768&+$1(;$0,1$7,21+$6%((10$'($1'/$7(5&/$,06)2502%,/,=$7,21/$%25(48,30(17 $1'250$7(5,$/65(48,5('%(&$86(2)',)),&8/7,(6(1&2817(5(':,//127%(5(&2*1,=(' 3527(&76758&785($1'2:1(5(48,30(17)520'$0$*(,00(',$7(/<5(3/$&(255(3$,572 25,*,1$/&21',7,21'$0$*(&$86('%<7+(&2175$&725:+(7+(5(48,30(17$33($5672%( &855(17/<,186(2512781/(66:5,77(1$87+25,=$7,21)5207+(2:1(5,1',&$7('27+(5:,6( 35(3$5(/,67,1*2)$//(;,67,1*'$0$*(',7(06$1'68%0,7722:1(535,2572%(*,11,1*:25. (;,67,1*,1)250$7,216+2:1217+('5$:,1*6+$6%((17$.(1)5202:1(5)851,6+(''5$:,1*6 $1'25/,0,7('),(/'2%6(59$7,216&02&2168/7,1*(1*,1((56,61275(63216,%/()257+( $&&85$&<2)$1<,1)250$7,21257+($'(48$&<6$)(7<$1'&21)250$1&(72&855(1735(9$,/,1* &2'(62)$1<:25.6+2:1$6(;,67,1*217+(6('5$:,1*6 ),(/'/2&$7((;,67,1*81'(5*5281'38%/,&$1'2:1(587,/,7,(62)$//75$'(6$1'%8,/',1* *5281',1*/,*+71,1*3527(&7,216<67(0635,2572$1<(;&$9$7,215(3/$&(255(3$,5'$0$*(' 87,/,7,(6$1'*5281',1*/,*+71,1*3527(&7,216<67(067225,*,1$/&21',7,21 (;,67,1*&21'8,7,6&2/25&2'('&217,18(86(2)&2/25('&21'8,7)251(::25. ),5(6($/$//),5(5$7(':$//$1')/2253(1(75$7,2169(5,)<5$7(':$///2&$7,21621 $5&+,7(&785$/'5$:,1*6 3529,'(6(3$5$7(,168/$7('*5281',1*&21'8&725,1$//)(('(5+20(581$1'%5$1&+&,5&8,76 5()(572$5&+,7(&785$/$1'0(&+$1,&$/(48,30(17'5$:,1*6)25(;$&7/2&$7,2162)(/(&75,&$/ '(9,&(6$1'/,*+7),;785(6'21276&$/()5207+((/(&75,&$/3/$16$'',7,21$/(/(&75,&$/ 5(48,5(0(17621$5&+,7(&785$/3/$16.,7&+(1(48,30(173/$16$1'0(&+$1,&$/3/$166+$//%( ,1&/8'(',17+((/(&75,&$/&2175$&725 6%,' 0,1,080:25.,1*&/($5$1&(63(57+(/$7(67(',7,212)7+(1$7,21$/(/(&75,&$/&2'(6+$//%( 3529,'('$5281'$1',1)52172)$//(/(&75,&$/(48,30(17 (/(&75,&$/&2175$&7256+$//0$,17$,1217+(-2%$18372'$7(6(72):25.,1*'5$:,1*60$5.(' 83726+2:(/(&75,&$/6<67(06$6,167$//('3529,'(2:1(5:,7+21(6(72)5(352'8&,%/(:,7+ $6%8,/7352-(&75(&25',1)250$7,21&/($5/<,1',&$7('(/(&75,&$/&2175$&7256+$//2%7$,1$1' 3$<)25$///2&$/)((63(50,76$1'6(59,&(62),163(&7,21$87+25,7,(65(48,5('%<(/(&75,&$/ :25.)257+,6(/(&75,&$/&216758&7,21 3529,'(7<3('83'$7('&203/(7($1'$&&85$7(3$1(/%2$5'&,5&8,7',5(&725,(6$77+( &203/(7,212):25.&/($1(;326('3$1(/%2$5'685)$&(6$1'&+(&.7,*+71(662)(/(&75,&$/ &211(&7,2165(3/$&('$0$*('&,5&8,7%5($.(56$65(48,5('$1'3529,'(),//(53/$7(6)25 9$&$1763$&(6 3529,'(/$%(/,1*2)$//(/(&75,&$/(48,30(17,16&23(2):25.,1&/8',1*%87127/,0,7('72 (1*,1(*(1(5$7256<67(0675$16)(56:,7&+(675$16)250(566:,7&+*($56:,7&+%2$5'6 3$1(/%2$5'602725&21752/&(17(56$1'',6&211(&7672,1',&$7(7+($03(5(5$7,1*92/7$*( 5$7,1*3+$6(&21'8&725&2/25&2',1*:,7+,17+((48,30(17$1'$33/,&$%/($,&5$7,1* $//1(:(/(&75,&$/(48,30(1768&+$66:,7&+%2$5'63$1(/%2$5'6,1'8675,$/&21752/3$1(/6 0(7(562&.(7(1&/2685(6$1'02725&21752/&(17(567+$7$5(/,.(/<725(48,5((;$0,1$7,21 $'-8670(176(59,&,1*250$,17(1$1&(:+,/((1(5*,=('6+$//%(),(/'0$5.('72:$5148$/,),(' 3(562162)327(17,$/(/(&75,&$5&)/$6++$=$5'67+(0$5.,1*6+$//%(/2&$7('62$672%( &/($5/<9,6,%/(7248$/,),('3(56216%()25((;$0,1$7,21$'-8670(176(59,&,1*250$,17(1$1&( 2)7+((48,30(173(51(&$57,&/( 5(9,6,216&+('8/( 5(9 '(6&5,37,21 '$7(  $%%,1)2  140 $37966 $3 0 $3 $3 $3 /6,* 87,/,7<0(7(5 3529,'( 0(7(562&.(7 1 * N9$87,/,7<3$' 02817(' 75$16)250(5 >*,1&@ 0'3$<93+$6( :,5(.$,&1(0$5 &8728)(5 72  '5,9(1 *5281'52'(07$,&0&00&0*,1&0&00&0*,1&0&00&0*,1&&+$5*(5 0&0,1& 0&0,1&0&0,1&&872 *5281'52' &872 *5281'52' &872 *5281'52' &8* &8*&8*&872 *5281'52' 6(&21'$5< &+$5*,1* &$%,1(7 6(&21'$5< &+$5*,1* &$%,1(7 35,0$5< &+$5*,1* &$%,1(7 0&00&0*,1&,17(5/2&.,17(5/2&./2:92/7$*(&$%/(6,1&&200&200 /(9(/   /(9(/   /HYHO   87,/,7< 75$16)250(5 ',675,%87,213$1(/ 0'3 6(&21'$5< &+$5*,1* &$%,1(7 6(&21'$5< &+$5*,1* &$%,1(7 35,0$5< &+$5*,1* &$%,1(7 &+$5*(5 5 6(+3URMHFW &KHFNHG%\ 'UDZQ%\ 3URMHFW6WDWXV ,VVXH'DWH 7KLVGUDZLQJLVDQLQVWUXPHQWRIVHUYLFHDQGVKDOO UHPDLQWKHSURSHUW\RI6KRUW(OOLRWW+HQGULFNVRQ,QF 6(+ 7KLVGUDZLQJFRQFHSWVDQGLGHDVFRQWDLQHG KHUHLQVKDOOQRWEHXVHGUHSURGXFHGUHYLVHGRU UHWDLQHGZLWKRXWWKHH[SUHVVZULWWHQDSSURYDORI6(+ 6XEPLVVLRQRUGLVWULEXWLRQRIWKLVGUDZLQJWRPHHW RIILFLDORUUHJXODWRU\UHTXLUHPHQWVRUIRUSXUSRVHVLQ FRQQHFWLRQZLWKWKHSURMHFWLVQRWEHFRQVWUXHGDV SXEOLFDWLRQLQGHURJDWLRQRIDQ\RIWKHULJKWVRI6(+ 1 2 7)2 5 &2 1 6 75 8 &7,2 1 6KRUW(OOLRWW+HQGULFNVRQ,QF$OO5LJKWV5HVHUYHG&23<5,*+7‹352-(&72:1(5 52$5,1*)25. 75$163257$7,21$87+25,7< 6(9,&(&(17(5'5,9( $63(1&2/25$'2 '(6,*1'2&80(176  &$% &$%30(/(&75,&$/21(/,1( ',$*5$058%(<3$5.(/(&75,&&+$5*(5$63(1&2/25$'252$5,1*)25.75$163257$7,21$87+25,7<( 21(/,1(',$*5$0   ( 32:(5&$%,1(7(/(9$7,21 5(9,6,216&+('8/( 5(9 '(6&5,37,21 '$7( 141 + +)()( 9$8/75(&,9,/&,7<2)$63(1 12',6785%$1&(72 (;,67,1*3/$17,1*6 (;,67,1*75(( 7235(6(59(  &/($5$1&(2))6(7$7 9$8/7 123/$17,1*6!+7 '5$,1/,1(&/($1287 5,6(57<35(&,9,/ &85%,1/(77<35(&,9,/ %2//$5'7<35(&,9,/ 12',6785%$1&(72 (;,67,1*3/$17,1*6  %8629(5+$1*&/($5$1&(=21( 3737373737  ( (;,67,1*87,/,7< 75$16)250(5 1(:87,/,7< 75$16)250(5 :,7+9$8/7 6((21(/,1( &21'8,7)2587,/,7< 6+$//%(6&+39& :,7+:,'(6:((3 ),%(5*/$66(/%2:60,1 %)* 7<3  678%726:,7&+$73$5. &$3$1'0$5./2&$7,21 678%,172 %277202)9$8/7 (;,67,1*)(('725(0$,1 $3352;/2&$7,212)/2: 92/7$*(&21'8,7678%287 87,/,7<6:,7&+ 5 6(+3URMHFW &KHFNHG%\ 'UDZQ%\ 3URMHFW6WDWXV ,VVXH'DWH 7KLVGUDZLQJLVDQLQVWUXPHQWRIVHUYLFHDQGVKDOO UHPDLQWKHSURSHUW\RI6KRUW(OOLRWW+HQGULFNVRQ,QF 6(+ 7KLVGUDZLQJFRQFHSWVDQGLGHDVFRQWDLQHG KHUHLQVKDOOQRWEHXVHGUHSURGXFHGUHYLVHGRU UHWDLQHGZLWKRXWWKHH[SUHVVZULWWHQDSSURYDORI6(+ 6XEPLVVLRQRUGLVWULEXWLRQRIWKLVGUDZLQJWRPHHW RIILFLDORUUHJXODWRU\UHTXLUHPHQWVRUIRUSXUSRVHVLQ FRQQHFWLRQZLWKWKHSURMHFWLVQRWEHFRQVWUXHGDV SXEOLFDWLRQLQGHURJDWLRQRIDQ\RIWKHULJKWVRI6(+ 1 2 7)2 5 &2 1 6 75 8 &7,2 1 6KRUW(OOLRWW+HQGULFNVRQ,QF$OO5LJKWV5HVHUYHG&23<5,*+7‹352-(&72:1(5 52$5,1*)25. 75$163257$7,21$87+25,7< 6(9,&(&(17(5'5,9( $63(1&2/25$'2 '(6,*1'2&80(176  &$% &$%30(/(&75,&$/*5281' /(9(/3/$158%(<3$5.(/(&75,&&+$5*(5$63(1&2/25$'252$5,1*)25.75$163257$7,21$87+25,7<(6&$/(   /(9(/&+$5*,1*67$7,21/$<287 3/$1127(6      0$.($//),1$/(/(&75,&$/&211(&7,21672(48,30(175(48,5,1*(/(&75,&$/ &211(&7,217+,66+$//,1&/8'(%87127%(/,0,7('72$//0(&+$1,&$/$1'27+(5 (48,30(17,1&/8'(',17+,6352-(&7 3529,'()86(66,=('3(5(48,30(170$18)$&785(5 65(48,5(0(176 ',6&211(&76:,7&+/2&$7,216$5(6+2:1',$*5$00$7,&$//<$1'6+$//%(,167$//(' ,1$&&(66,%/(/2&$7,2167268,7(48,30(17$1'63$&(',6&211(&76:,7&+(66+$// %(:,7+,16,*+72)7+((48,30(177+(<6(59($1'02817('$7 0$;,08072723 2)&$%,1(70$,17$,11(&:25.63$&(5(48,5(0(176 &225',1$7((;$&75(48,5(0(176$1'/2&$7,2162)(48,30(17:,7+9(1'25 '5$:,1*635,2572528*+,1 $//287'225$1'522)7235(&(37$&/(66+$//%(287'2255$7('$1'6+$//+$9($ :($7+(53522),186(&29(5 5(9,6,216&+('8/( 5(9 '(6&5,37,21 '$7( 142