HomeMy WebLinkAboutFile Documents.311 Park Ave.0319.2017 (3).ARBK 0319.2017.ARBK_Zoning_1
Architectural Permit Set.311 Park Ave.2017.12.pdf(6)
--—--—--—- — Page: 13 4' 5/8"
Checkmark: Unchecked
Author:jimp
File Name: Architectural Permit Set.311 Park Ave.2017.12.pdf
FP Response:Architectural projections and existing, non-
conforming roof overhangs have been dimensioned and noted
on roof plans. REF Z-104X&Z-104.
Page: 13
111111 Checkmark: Unchecked 1'-4"
�In1�, Author:jimp
wie‘l File Name:Architectural Permit Set.311 Park Ave.2017.12.pdf
FP Response:Architectural projections and existing, non-
conforming roof overhangs have been dimensioned and noted
on roof plans. REF Z-104X&Z-104.
Page: 21
Checkmark: Unchecked 1 -g
_ Author:jimp
• File Name: Architectural Permit Set.311 Park Ave.2017.12.pdf
FP Response:Architectural projections and existing, non-
I conforming roof overhangs have been dimensioned and noted
dz on roof plans. REF Z-104X&Z-104.
Page: 21
! The total projection for overhangs cannot
Checkmark: Unchecked
111 _ exceed 18". This side of the house, as
fI� �= Author:jimp well as a portion of the rear, are already
File Name: Architectural Permit Set.311 Park Ave.2017.12.pdf non-conforming because the house itself
does not meet the minimum setback
— FP Response:All architectural projections over setback
IS c requirements. Therefore, the
° are existingto remain. The existinggutter is to be
o-�i�==-•---_-------� _�'�, non-conformity cannot be expanded
replaced and we will not be increasing the existing non- beyond what is already there. Please
conforming conditions. REF Z-104X&Z-104. show that the side and rear overhangs
are not expanding.
PROPERTY LINE a Page: 21
Checkmark: Unchecked 4' 5 5/8"
Author:jimp
File Name: Architectural Permit Set.311 Park Ave.2017.12.pdf
FP Response:Architectural projections and existing, non-
conforming roof overhangs have been dimensioned and noted
on roof plans. REF Z-104X&Z-104.
Page: 21
The total projection for overhangs cannot
I Checkmark: Unchecked
1��1 IIII! exceed 18". The front of the house is
II ', `I;�fi IIIII� .I r Author:jimp
. j141II'r':!I_ File Name: Architectural Permit Set.311 Park Ave.2017.12.pdf already non conforming because the
house itself does not meet the minimum
bbo FP Response:All architectural projections over setback setback requirements. Therefore,the
non-conformity cannot be expanded
are existing to remain. The existing gutter is to be beyond what is already there. Please
replaced and we will not be increasing the existing non- show that the front overhang is not
conforming conditions. REF Z-104X&Z-104. expanding.
Zoning Set.311 Park Ave.2017.12.pdf(11)
... ::- Page: 1
We will require all of this information to be
Checkmark: Unchecked
T` shown on the survey. We will also
_`:=~, Author:jimp
File Name: Zoning Set.311 Park Ave.2017.12.pdf require the survey to show that no portion
__ of the lot is below the"high water line"as
FP Response: Survey has been updated to include the per the table in 26.575.020.C, Measuring
remaining requirements per the Compliant City of Aspen Net Lot Area.
Survey checklist. REF:All applicable sheets in the Zoning Set
Page: 3
Checkmark: Unchecked Are the existing sheds being modified?
Are the existing sheds E Author:jimp They are currently non-conforming, and
being modified? They are FileName: ZoningSet.311 Park Ave.2017.12.pdf
will need to follow all other
currently non-conforming, p
and will need to follow all non-conforming rules.
other non-conforming rules. FP Response: Existing sheds are existing to remain
and will not be modified. REF Z-003X, Z-003, Z-004
--,..,_,- Page: 3
- �-= Checkmark: Unchecked Setbacks are set per the Code language
1 iriza r- Author:jimp in Chapter 700, not what is existing. The
-., 1 • File Name: Zoning Set.311 Park Ave.2017.12.pdf house may not be compliant with those
�° ^" setbacks, but that doesn't change what
µ.,so..µ. ,_
FP Response: Setbacks have been revised per Land Use the setbacks are. Please show all of the
- . Code for the R-6 Zone District. All Drawings that reference setbacks per the Land use Code for the
— , the setbacks have been updated on both A&Z-Sets. R-6 Zone District in 26.710.040.D.
-- Page: 3
Setbacks are set per the Code language
Checkmark: Unchecked
in Chapter 700, not what is existing. The
Author:jimp
,y� File Name: Zoning Set.311 Park Ave.2017.12.pdf house may not be compliant with those
zµ setbacks, but that doesn't change what
!, k , „t FP Response: Setbacks have been revised per Land Use the setbacks are. Please show all of the
`
M Code for the R-6 Zone District. All Drawings that reference setbacks per the Land use Code for the
Irm
o the setbacks have been updated on both A&Z-Sets. R-6 Zone District in 26.710.040.D.
\w' },, - Page: 3
Checkmark: Unchecked Setbacks are set per the Code language
�.--° Author:jimp in Chapter 700, not what is existing. The
J . _i-- n File Name: Zoning Set.311 Park Ave.2017.12.pdf
house may not be compliant with those
setbacks, but that doesn't change what
e siw; FP Response: Setbacks have been revised per Land Use the setbacks are. Please show all of the
r=.e. Code for the R-6 Zone District. All Drawings that reference setbacks per the Land use Code for the
, 'At-, the setbacks have been updated on both A&Z-Sets. R-6 Zone District in 26.710.040.D.
Page: 9
area�s ai:° Checkmark: Unchecked This area is also being demoed-add to
om,nsydem°en. your totals.
Author:jimp
File Name: Zoning Set.311 Park Ave.2017.12.pdf
F^I
FP Response: Demo fills and figures have been
a updated to show the portion of wall being removed
' from Wall#11. REF Z-007, Z-008&Z-009
i I: r , Page: 9
Looking at this drawing as well as the
r Checkmark: Unchecked
elevations, it appears that a portion of the
' - o Author:jimp pp
a� , k File Name: Zoning Set.311 Park Ave.2017.12.pdf outer wall to the side of the entry opening
;°°"'"to'n1$dfd .9.,54Ve°°= i Ok is being demolished. This does not show
el Y, neion of the
paars[naes
�� ail portion onne omen wall to me side � I
"naa"'"°°e"'"g'ane'"g — ' FP Response: Demo fills and figures have been on wall#4 above. Please add.
� 'i aemorsnedmmsdoes°or snow o°
wa man°°a.a.°aaeaad. updated to show the portion of wall being removed
'., from Wall#4. REF Z-007,Z-008&Z-009
Page: 12
Checkmark: Unchecked Please amend the shading to show this
', a ,, Author:jimp as a Subgrade wall.
File Name: Zoning Set.311 Park Ave.2017.12.pdf
., FP Response: Hatches have been updated to
show Existing Wall 1 to be a sub-grade wall.
,,s=I, ,, REF Z-011
Page: 12 These wall heights do not seem to
Checkmark: Unchecked
�In� ��I correspond with what is shown on the
Er--- ,ELIDE File Name: Zoning
sections. please reconcile the drawings.
__ File Name: Zoning Set.311 Park Ave.2017.12.pdf
o — Iq- FP Response: Existing and Proposed sub-grade walls 6-10 have been
adjusted to show correct heights. FAR has been updated to reflect these
changes. REF Z-001, Z-011, Z-012,Z-013, Z-014, Z-015&Z-016
o Page: 15
Checkmark: Unchecked Is this area being counted in your FA total
-.--o for this level? If not, please include it.
--_--. Author:jimp
---0 File Name: Zoning Set.311 Park Ave.2017.12.pdf
1 b _, b b b
.e FP Response:The area below the stairs is counted
toward our lower level FAR. Graphic settings have been
updated to display the correct fills. REF Z-014
Page: 16
Checkmark: Unchecked Is this area being counted in your FA total
Author:jimp
o for this level? If not, please include it.
a eaee19 r � File Name: Zoning Set.311 Park Ave.2017.12.pdf
,,I counted In your FA y
F'1 ;°c1uCI:r Se FP Response:The area below the stairs is counted
-a— toward our main level FAR. Graphic settings have been
I I I updated to display the correct fills. REF Z-015
054.2017.ACBK_Zoning_1
City of Aspen Building Permit Application Packet.311 Park Ave.2017.12.pdf(1)
�..._.._....., ... Page: 9
Checkmark: Unchecked Contractor needs to sign before issuance
_ Author:jimp
a"•�•••••• — �°° File Name: City of Aspen Building Permit Application
Packet.311 Park Ave.2017.12.pdf
"°_°—""1—`°s"'' FP Response:The form will be signed by a contractor
once a contractor is selected prior to the final building permit
issuance.