Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutFile Documents.311 Park Ave.0319.2017 (3).ARBK 0319.2017.ARBK_Zoning_1 Architectural Permit Set.311 Park Ave.2017.12.pdf(6) --—--—--—- — Page: 13 4' 5/8" Checkmark: Unchecked Author:jimp File Name: Architectural Permit Set.311 Park Ave.2017.12.pdf FP Response:Architectural projections and existing, non- conforming roof overhangs have been dimensioned and noted on roof plans. REF Z-104X&Z-104. Page: 13 111111 Checkmark: Unchecked 1'-4" �In1�, Author:jimp wie‘l File Name:Architectural Permit Set.311 Park Ave.2017.12.pdf FP Response:Architectural projections and existing, non- conforming roof overhangs have been dimensioned and noted on roof plans. REF Z-104X&Z-104. Page: 21 Checkmark: Unchecked 1 -g _ Author:jimp • File Name: Architectural Permit Set.311 Park Ave.2017.12.pdf FP Response:Architectural projections and existing, non- I conforming roof overhangs have been dimensioned and noted dz on roof plans. REF Z-104X&Z-104. Page: 21 ! The total projection for overhangs cannot Checkmark: Unchecked 111 _ exceed 18". This side of the house, as fI� �= Author:jimp well as a portion of the rear, are already File Name: Architectural Permit Set.311 Park Ave.2017.12.pdf non-conforming because the house itself does not meet the minimum setback — FP Response:All architectural projections over setback IS c requirements. Therefore, the ° are existingto remain. The existinggutter is to be o-�i�==-•---_-------� _�'�, non-conformity cannot be expanded replaced and we will not be increasing the existing non- beyond what is already there. Please conforming conditions. REF Z-104X&Z-104. show that the side and rear overhangs are not expanding. PROPERTY LINE a Page: 21 Checkmark: Unchecked 4' 5 5/8" Author:jimp File Name: Architectural Permit Set.311 Park Ave.2017.12.pdf FP Response:Architectural projections and existing, non- conforming roof overhangs have been dimensioned and noted on roof plans. REF Z-104X&Z-104. Page: 21 The total projection for overhangs cannot I Checkmark: Unchecked 1��1 IIII! exceed 18". The front of the house is II ', `I;�fi IIIII� .I r Author:jimp . j141II'r':!I_ File Name: Architectural Permit Set.311 Park Ave.2017.12.pdf already non conforming because the house itself does not meet the minimum bbo FP Response:All architectural projections over setback setback requirements. Therefore,the non-conformity cannot be expanded are existing to remain. The existing gutter is to be beyond what is already there. Please replaced and we will not be increasing the existing non- show that the front overhang is not conforming conditions. REF Z-104X&Z-104. expanding. Zoning Set.311 Park Ave.2017.12.pdf(11) ... ::- Page: 1 We will require all of this information to be Checkmark: Unchecked T` shown on the survey. We will also _`:=~, Author:jimp File Name: Zoning Set.311 Park Ave.2017.12.pdf require the survey to show that no portion __ of the lot is below the"high water line"as FP Response: Survey has been updated to include the per the table in 26.575.020.C, Measuring remaining requirements per the Compliant City of Aspen Net Lot Area. Survey checklist. REF:All applicable sheets in the Zoning Set Page: 3 Checkmark: Unchecked Are the existing sheds being modified? Are the existing sheds E Author:jimp They are currently non-conforming, and being modified? They are FileName: ZoningSet.311 Park Ave.2017.12.pdf will need to follow all other currently non-conforming, p and will need to follow all non-conforming rules. other non-conforming rules. FP Response: Existing sheds are existing to remain and will not be modified. REF Z-003X, Z-003, Z-004 --,..,_,- Page: 3 - �-= Checkmark: Unchecked Setbacks are set per the Code language 1 iriza r- Author:jimp in Chapter 700, not what is existing. The -., 1 • File Name: Zoning Set.311 Park Ave.2017.12.pdf house may not be compliant with those �° ^" setbacks, but that doesn't change what µ.,so..µ. ,_ FP Response: Setbacks have been revised per Land Use the setbacks are. Please show all of the - . Code for the R-6 Zone District. All Drawings that reference setbacks per the Land use Code for the — , the setbacks have been updated on both A&Z-Sets. R-6 Zone District in 26.710.040.D. -- Page: 3 Setbacks are set per the Code language Checkmark: Unchecked in Chapter 700, not what is existing. The Author:jimp ,y� File Name: Zoning Set.311 Park Ave.2017.12.pdf house may not be compliant with those zµ setbacks, but that doesn't change what !, k , „t FP Response: Setbacks have been revised per Land Use the setbacks are. Please show all of the ` M Code for the R-6 Zone District. All Drawings that reference setbacks per the Land use Code for the Irm o the setbacks have been updated on both A&Z-Sets. R-6 Zone District in 26.710.040.D. \w' },, - Page: 3 Checkmark: Unchecked Setbacks are set per the Code language �.--° Author:jimp in Chapter 700, not what is existing. The J . _i-- n File Name: Zoning Set.311 Park Ave.2017.12.pdf house may not be compliant with those setbacks, but that doesn't change what e siw; FP Response: Setbacks have been revised per Land Use the setbacks are. Please show all of the r=.e. Code for the R-6 Zone District. All Drawings that reference setbacks per the Land use Code for the , 'At-, the setbacks have been updated on both A&Z-Sets. R-6 Zone District in 26.710.040.D. Page: 9 area�s ai:° Checkmark: Unchecked This area is also being demoed-add to om,nsydem°en. your totals. Author:jimp File Name: Zoning Set.311 Park Ave.2017.12.pdf F^I FP Response: Demo fills and figures have been a updated to show the portion of wall being removed ' from Wall#11. REF Z-007, Z-008&Z-009 i I: r , Page: 9 Looking at this drawing as well as the r Checkmark: Unchecked elevations, it appears that a portion of the ' - o Author:jimp pp a� , k File Name: Zoning Set.311 Park Ave.2017.12.pdf outer wall to the side of the entry opening ;°°"'"to'n1$dfd .9.,54Ve°°= i Ok is being demolished. This does not show el Y, neion of the paars[naes �� ail portion onne omen wall to me side � I "naa"'"°°e"'"g'ane'"g — ' FP Response: Demo fills and figures have been on wall#4 above. Please add. � 'i aemorsnedmmsdoes°or snow o° wa man°°a.a.°aaeaad. updated to show the portion of wall being removed '., from Wall#4. REF Z-007,Z-008&Z-009 Page: 12 Checkmark: Unchecked Please amend the shading to show this ', a ,, Author:jimp as a Subgrade wall. File Name: Zoning Set.311 Park Ave.2017.12.pdf ., FP Response: Hatches have been updated to show Existing Wall 1 to be a sub-grade wall. ,,s=I, ,, REF Z-011 Page: 12 These wall heights do not seem to Checkmark: Unchecked �In� ��I correspond with what is shown on the Er--- ,ELIDE File Name: Zoning sections. please reconcile the drawings. __ File Name: Zoning Set.311 Park Ave.2017.12.pdf o — Iq- FP Response: Existing and Proposed sub-grade walls 6-10 have been adjusted to show correct heights. FAR has been updated to reflect these changes. REF Z-001, Z-011, Z-012,Z-013, Z-014, Z-015&Z-016 o Page: 15 Checkmark: Unchecked Is this area being counted in your FA total -.--o for this level? If not, please include it. --_--. Author:jimp ---0 File Name: Zoning Set.311 Park Ave.2017.12.pdf 1 b _, b b b .e FP Response:The area below the stairs is counted toward our lower level FAR. Graphic settings have been updated to display the correct fills. REF Z-014 Page: 16 Checkmark: Unchecked Is this area being counted in your FA total Author:jimp o for this level? If not, please include it. a eaee19 r � File Name: Zoning Set.311 Park Ave.2017.12.pdf ,,I counted In your FA y F'1 ;°c1uCI:r Se FP Response:The area below the stairs is counted -a— toward our main level FAR. Graphic settings have been I I I updated to display the correct fills. REF Z-015 054.2017.ACBK_Zoning_1 City of Aspen Building Permit Application Packet.311 Park Ave.2017.12.pdf(1) �..._.._....., ... Page: 9 Checkmark: Unchecked Contractor needs to sign before issuance _ Author:jimp a"•�•••••• — �°° File Name: City of Aspen Building Permit Application Packet.311 Park Ave.2017.12.pdf "°_°—""1—`°s"'' FP Response:The form will be signed by a contractor once a contractor is selected prior to the final building permit issuance.