Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
agenda.hpc.20231025
AGENDA ASPEN HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION October 25, 2023 4:30 PM, City Council Chambers - 3rd Floor 427 Rio Grande Place Aspen, CO 81611 I.ROLL CALL II.MINUTES II.A Draft Minutes - 8/23/23 & 9/13/23 III.PUBLIC COMMENTS IV.COMMISSIONER MEMBER COMMENTS V.DISCLOSURE OF CONFLICT OF INTEREST VI.PROJECT MONITORING VI.A 110 W. Main Street - Project Monitoring VI.B Project Monitoring VII.STAFF COMMENTS VIII.CERTIFICATE OF NO NEGATIVE EFFECT ISSUED IX.CALL UP REPORTS X.SUBMIT PUBLIC NOTICE FOR AGENDA ITEMS XI.OLD BUSINESS minutes.hpc.20230823_DRAFT.docx minutes.hpc.20230913_DRAFT.docx 110 W Main Project Monitoring Memo October 2023.pdf Attachment A_Photos of materials approved October 2022.pdf Attachment B_Applicant proposal.pdf PROJECT MONITORING.doc 1 1 XI.A 517 E. Hopkins Avenue – Substantial Amendment to Major Development and Growth Management, CONTINUE PUBLIC HEARING TO DECEMBER 13TH XII.NEW BUSINESS XII.A135 W. Francis St. – Minor Development, Relocation - PUBLIC HEARING XIII.ADJOURN XIV.NEXT RESOLUTION NUMBER 135 W. Francis St. Memo. Minor Dev. Relocation.pdf Resolution #__, Series of 2023.pdf Exhibit A - HP Design Guidelines.135 W Francis St.LPA-23-058.pdf Exhibit B - Relocation Criteria.135 W Francis St.LPA-23-058.pdf Exhibit C - Referral Comments.135 W Francis.LPA-23-058.pdf Exhibit D - Application.135 W Francis St.LPA-23-058.pdf TYPICAL PROCEEDING FORMAT FOR ALL PUBLIC HEARINGS (1 Hour, 10 Minutes for each Major Agenda Item) 1. Declaration of Conflicts of Interest (at beginning of agenda) 2. Presentation of proof of legal notice (at beginning of agenda) 3. Applicant presentation (20 minutes) 4. Board questions and clarifications of applicant (5 minutes) 5. Staff presentation (5 minutes) 6. Board questions and clarifications of staff (5 minutes) 7. Public comments (5 minutes total, or 3 minutes/ person or as determined by the Chair) 8. Close public comment portion of hearing 9. Applicant rebuttal/clarification (5 minutes) 10. Staff rebuttal/clarification (5 minutes) End of fact finding. Chairperson identifies the issues to be discussed. 11. Deliberation by the commission and findings based on criteria commences. No further input from applicant or staff unless invited by the Chair. Staff may ask to be recognized if there is a factual error to be corrected. If the item is to be continued, the Chair may provide a summary of areas to be restudied at their discretion, but the applicant is not to re-start discussion of the case or the board’s direction. (20 minutes) 12. Motion Updated: November 15, 2021 2 2 REGULAR MEETING HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION AUGUST 23RD, 2023 Chairperson Thompson opened the regular meeting of the Aspen Historic Preservation Commission at 4:30pm. Commissioners in attendance: Peter Fornell, Roger Moyer, Jodi Surfas, Jeffrey Halferty, Barb Pitchford, Riley Warwick and Kara Thompson. Absent was Kim Raymond. Staff present: Amy Simon, Planning Director Kirsten Armstrong, Principal Planner - Historic Preservation Stuart Hayden, Planner - Historic Preservation Ben Anderson, Deputy Director - Community Development Jim True, City Attorney Luisa Berne, Assistant City Attorney Mike Sear, Deputy City Clerk MINUTES: Mr. Moyer motioned to approve the draft minutes from July 26 th, 2023. Ms. Pitchford seconded. Roll Call Vote:Mr. Fornell, yes; Mr. Moyer, yes; Ms. Surfas, yes; Ms. Pitchford, yes; Mr. Warwick, yes; Mr. Halferty, abstained; Ms. Thompson, yes. 6-0 with one member abstaining, motion passes. PUBLIC COMMENTS: None. COMMISSION MEMBER COMMENTS: None. DISCLOSURE OF CONFLICTS OF INTEREST: Ms. Thompson noted that she was conflicted on the first agenda item and would leave for that item. PROJECT MONITORING: None. STAFF COMMENTS: Ms. Armstrong reminded the members of HPC’s September 5 th joint work session with City Council. She also mentioned that the September 27th HPC meeting would be cancelled. She noted that the applicant for the 820 E Cooper project that was continued until the September 13th meeting, is requesting that HPC attend a site visit at noon that day. CERTIFICATE OF NO NEGATIVE EFFECT: Ms. Armstrong noted that she had approved two certificates of no negative effect. One for 308 E Hopkins for replacement of south façade windows, doors, and some materials. She had also amened a certificate at 627 E Hopkins, which is a non-historic building on a historic lot that would be replacing a front door and lighting sconces. CALL UP REPORTS: Ms. Simon noted that two notices of call up went before City Council the previous night. One was for 205 W Main St, for which Council upheld HPC’s approval, the other was for the Rubey Park charging stations project, which was also upheld. Ms. Thompson asked if City Council had any comments about the 205 W Main St notice. Ms. Simon said they commented about the new process in general and recognition of the upcoming work session with HPC. She also noted that Council indicated that HPC had properly executed the authority they had under 3 REGULAR MEETING HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION AUGUST 23RD, 2023 the new process. As for the Rubey Park project. Ms. Simon said that Council had asked a few questions about the charging equipment. SUBMIT PUBLIC NOTICE FOR AGENDA ITEMS: Mr. True said that he reviewed public notice, and that notice was provided per the code for the agenda item. Ms. Thompson left the meeting. Vice Chair Halferty took over the meeting for the first agenda item. NEW BUSINESS: 517 E. Hopkins Avenue – Substantial Amendment to Major Development and Growth Management, PUBLIC HEARING Ms. Simon first noted that this is a fairly unusual situation as it deals with a condition of approvalthat HPC established as part of a 2018 discussion. Applicant Presentation:Sara Adams – Bendon Adams Ms. Adams started her presentation by introducing herself, Mr. Mark Hunt, and Dr. Johnathan Leary. She then went over some history of the approved commercial project and noted that it was in for a building permit. She noted that the existing building is about three floors of mixed use and includes 4 affordable housing units on the upper floor. She said that they are requesting HPC to consider the new proposed use for the second floor. She noted that in 2018 HPC included a condition of approval that the second floor be co-working space or another use to be approved by HPC. The proposed use would be described by Dr. Leary. She said they are also asking HPC to affirm affordable housing credits for mitigation of the 4 affordable housing units as they had done previously on this project. She then went over the history of the building and how things got to the 2018 HPC approval of co-working space on the second floor in order to retain the use of affordable housing credits as mitigation for the 4 units. She said that there is no change to the net leasable floor area or the approved exterior of the building and that it is just about the proposed use of the upper floor space and the 2018 condition of approval, which she read in its entirety. As for growth management, she noted that in 2018, HPC had decided that having onsite housing was an inappropriate solution in the downtown core and found that housing credits were acceptable in this situation when tied to the co-working condition of approval. She turned the presentation over to Dr. Leary to describe the proposed use of the space by Remedy Place. He said his background is in sports medicine and that he wanted to create a different concept of wellness and bringing people together. He said they are not a spa or gym, but rather they are about self- care with a social twist. He presented slides going over the concept and described other locations in Los Angeles and New York. He said that the idea provides not only a place to go to feel better and connect, but also is a new environment to work in. He then talked about the global trends in wellness, the evolution of work environments and work culture and how the Remedy Place concept addresses these. He showed the proposed floor plan of the second-floor space and describedthe layout of the workspaces and other amenities. He noted that most of the wellness amenities would be located in the basement of the building, and he described some of these offerings, including Cryo and Hyperbaric chambers and IV treatments. Mr. Hunt then spoke to the benefits of Remedy Place and why it would be a great addition to Aspen. He said that they believe it fits the idea of a co-working place. He talked about the current and developing 4 REGULAR MEETING HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION AUGUST 23RD, 2023 idea of work environments and thought that this concept was very dynamic and that the health and wellness aspect blends well with the core values of town. Mr. Moyer asked if there was anyone interested in the space with the “old” model of co-working. Mr. Hunt said that it would not be a problem to just go in and do multiple businesses with shared space if HPC did not go with the new concept of Remedy Place. Mr. Warwick asked if this was an application to consider this concept as a co-work space or is it to change the previous approval of a new use of the space. Mr. Hunt said they took the approach that this is co-workspace, but that the City has taken the position that it is not. He said that if they do not see it as a co-workspace, then they are asking HPC to approve the new use. Ms. Adams clarified that HPC is not deciding if it is co-working or not, but rather considering approving another use of the space. Mr. Halferty asked if the use of the space was a zoning issue. Ms. Adams said that in the staff memo the City considers this a spa, while the applicant believes that the concept aligns with the intent of the previous condition of approval as co-working. She noted that, according to the floor plans that were presented, about 83% of the second floor would be office space. Dr. Leary described some of the different types of working spaces that would be created. Mr. Halferty then asked about the pricing model of the services or available working spaces. Dr. Leary described the pricing model, noting that the use of workspace is free, and the other services or treatments are an add-ons. Mr. Moyer asked if this is only related to the second floor, to which Ms. Adams said yes. Staff Presentation:Amy Simon, Planning Director Ms. Simon started her presentation by noting that this is a discussion about language and not design. She showed the site plan of the upper floor of the building that was presented at the 2018 HPC meeting. She went over the history of and what led up to the 2018 HPC meeting and what came from that. She also noted that when this came to HPC in 2018, the applicant was very passionate about the co-working space as a meaningful way to offset the displacement of the affordable housing offsite by the way of credits. She said that there is no representation in the Land use Code of what “co-working” space is, but that many representations were made in the 2018 meeting to what it was. Ms. Simon said that they are not here tonight for HPC to determine whether Remedy Place is co- working or not as staff, after interpreting the Code, has already determined it is not. She noted that there is an appeal process if the applicant does not agree with staff’s findings. She did reiterate that HPC can decide if the use, whether it is co-working or not, is allowed. Ms. Simon noted that in 2018, in order for HPC to not insist that affordable housing be rebuilt on the site, they needed to find that to do so would be in conflict with zoning or an inappropriate solution. She noted that the HPC members in 2018 did make that finding based on the strong representation of a co- working space that would have public benefit. She said that staff wants to reinforce that affordable housing in this building is the code requirement and to not insist on that happening would be an exception. She said that if the members move past the importance of the space being co-working and approve the proposed new use, staff would like them to explain why another use is still fitting the criteria to allow for the affordable housing to be mitigated offsite. 5 REGULAR MEETING HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION AUGUST 23RD, 2023 Ms. Simon went over the three options that HPC had on this. One is to retain the previous condition of approval and not entertain a new use. Another option is for HPC to entertain that they go back to having affordable housing in the building as is required by code. The third option would be that if HPC decides to allow another use, that the language about co-working be struck from the condition. This would eliminate the need to continue coming back to HPC with any future change in tenant or use. Ms. Simon stated that staff’s recommendation is to hold tight to the previous condition of approval and not flex on it at this time. Mr. Moyer asked why in staff’s memo they did not just say that affordable housing should be the use of the space. Ms. Simon said they could not insist on that at this point because HPC in 2018 deemed that co-working space could be substituted for affordable housing and included it in the conditions of approval. Ms. Pitchford asked who would monitor the use of the space. She said that she had done some research on Remedy Place and thought it seemed like a spa that one might decide to talk business in. Ms. Simon said that the City would monitor the use of the space through the issuance of building permits and or business licenses. Mr. Halferty asked if staff had had conversations with the applicant about finding a compromise between affordable housing and what the applicant needed. Ms. Simon said she did not think that it was staff’s job to identify a compromise, rather that would be a discussion for HPC. Mr. Fornell asked if the applicant did build affordable housing on site, would they be able to do so and mitigate any parking by fee-in-lieu. Ms. Simon said yes. Mr. Moyer asked if the current affordable housing units were rentals. Ms. Adamssaid yes. Ms. Adams asked if Mr. Hunt could comment on the affordable housing aspect of this. The board agreed. Mr. Hunt commented that they take affordable housing very seriously and realize that it is a big problem. He said they are not here to determine if they are going to be putting affordable housing units back into the building. He said they are not going to do that, as they have a valid approval and would just put in traditional co-working spaces if necessary. He noted that his company had already completed 17 affordable units around town so far and are on their way to 54 units. Ms. Surfas asked for some clarification on how Remedy Place works for non-members. Could she, as a non-member, rent office space. Ms. Adams said yes. Ms. Simon noted that since a development agreement, reiterating the approval and terms of the previous HPC decision in 2018, was signed by the Mayor, on behalf of Council, if HPC were to accept another use of the space at this meeting, it would have to go to City Council for their acceptance. PUBLIC COMMENTS: Mr. Jimmy Marcus said he was the owner of a neighboring property at 533 E Hopkins and stated his thoughts on the project. He said that his property has been the main one affected by this project and the varying potential uses proposed over the years. He believed in the proposed use of the space by Remedy Place and thought it met the spirit of the previous HPC decision of a co-working space. He mentioned his tenant’s main complaint is the lack of foot traffic due to the building next door and he did not know why they would make it harder for Mr. Hunt to get this property redeveloped. 6 REGULAR MEETING HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION AUGUST 23RD, 2023 Ms. Simon mentioned that the HPC members had received a public comment letter from Alexandra George (Exhibit J) and she paraphrased it into the record. She then noted two public comment letters (Exhibit J) that had been received just before the meeting and read them into the record. Dr. Leary responded to the public comments. He said that at a few of their other locations he had been surprised by the amount of people wanted to stick around and work from Remedy Place. He said that the Aspen location would be an evolution of the brand and concept. BOARD DISCUSSION: Mr. Halferty went over HPC’s purview here and described their three options, as described by Ms. Simon earlier. Ms. Surfas commented that the New York Times article about Remedy Place that Dr. Leary referenced, noted another similar business that changed their business model to include co-working space. She said Remedy Place could likewise change their business model as proposed for the Aspen location and that she would be able to rent a workspace. Mr. Fornell commented that he thought the sections of the Land Use Code that speak to having affordable housing on site were outdated and should be removed. He noted that the applicant would be providing affordable housing regardless of it being on site or off and that 1,000 square feet of net leasable floor area produces a lot more in taxes than the same amount of affordable housing on site. He said that affordable housing in a community like area outside of the core is much more attractive than something in the core off an alley. He agreed with Ms. Surfas that this concept is a co-workspace amended for a new decade. He said he was in support of allowing the new use of the space. Mr. Warwick noted that it was clear that the applicant was not going to build affordable housing on site and that this really was about whether this new concept was considered co-workspace. He mentioned that there are several traditional co-working spaces in town and more where being developed. He did not see this concept as co-working, but thought it was a good concept and use for the space and if it made the project feasible and activated the block he was in support. Mr. Moyer referenced HPC’s decision in 2018 and agreed that the new concept would bring vitality to the block, and he would be ok with the different use of the space. Mr. Halferty said that commercial space is always a challenge when HPC reviews new buildings. He acknowledged that, as Mr. Fornell and the applicant have stated, there are always other avenues for affordable housing mitigation as permitted by the Land Use Code. He also acknowledged the evolution of workspaces and work environments, but wondered about the hypothetical of the new concept going out of business and what happens then with the space and would it have to come back to HPC. He noted that Zoning officers would have to somehow confirm that the co-working element stays and is inclusive. He thought that Dr. Leary had an interesting concept and seemed to be embracing the public. He thought that as long as there is enforcement of the concept that includes a certain amount of co- working space and related office amenities that are available to everyone and that there is a community benefit, he could be in support of the project. He also noted that this is another topic that could be discussed with City Council, as it is outside HPC’s normal purview and review. Mr. True went over HPC’s best way to move forwardregarding their decision as there seemed to be four members who were in support of the new use. Knowing that staff has already made the determination 7 REGULAR MEETING HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION AUGUST 23RD, 2023 that the concept is not co-working, Mr. True said that if HPC decides that the new use is appropriate and want to allow it, that the language in the Resolution regarding co-working space be struck and it be allowed to be permitted uses. He thought it would be best to delete the existing provision that requires this to come back to HPC if another use is proposed in the future and that any uses permitted in the zone district be allowed. There was some discussion between the members about whether the co-working space language should be stricken from section 11 of the Resolution. Ms. Surfas did not want it stricken because it would allow the co-working spaces to potentially become treatment rooms or some other non-co-working spaces over time. She thought it was presented as a mixed use of the second floor with some co-working spaces and some treatment areas. She suggested that they make sure a certain percentage of the space stay as co-working. Mr. Warwick mentioned a hypothetical situation where there is a certain amount of the space that gets dedicated to co-working and then no one from the public ends up using it to work. He said that they could be forcing the space to have an amount of square footage that sits empty. There was more discussion on how to handle this situation of potentially requiring certain permitted uses and not others. Mr. Fornell did not think they should be limiting what potential future uses could occur in the space or not and favored striking the language requiring co-working space. Mr. Warwick agreed. Ms. Pitchford disagreed. Mr. True acknowledged this as a tricky situation, because as he saw it, two members were in support of some type of restrictions on the use that two other members were not in support of. MOTION: Mr. Fornell motioned to approve the Resolution as proposed, leaving the language in section 11, but striking the portion that talks about the co-working use of the space and adding the language presented to allow the second floor to be occupied by any use permitted in the zone district. As requested by staff, Mr. Fornell then stated that his reasoning for the motion was based on the fact that the requirement for onsite affordable housing in the core predates the downzoning and height requirements as well as the creation of the affordable housing certificate program and he believed that City Council should revisit this requirement in the Land Use Code. He stated that in 2018, HPC determined that it was ok to have the affordable housing be developed off site and he was asking the current HPC to determine the same. Mr. Warwick seconded Mr. Fornell’s motion. Mr. True noted that the motion as made, did not include any of the conditions that two of the supporters of the project had suggested, related to specific use requirements or enforcement. Roll call vote:Mr. Fornell, yes; Mr. Moyer, no; Ms. Surfas, no; Ms. Pitchford, no; Mr. Warwick, yes; Mr. Halferty, no. 2-4 vote, motion does not pass. Ms. Surfas believed they need to include language that states that a certain percentage of the space needs to stay as co-working. She said that the representation that was made in 2018 was that it was affordable co-workspace. She believed that this was a community benefit. She did not want to see the co-working spaces in the new concept, as represented by the applicant, have the opportunity to be reduced or changed to another use over time. She said that if the concept does not work out, the applicant should have to come back to HPC for approval of another use. 8 REGULAR MEETING HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION AUGUST 23RD, 2023 There was some discussion about whether HPC could just refer this matter to City Council. Mr. True made an attempt to craft draft language for a condition that would leave the provision that if the applicant changes what was represented at today’s meeting and approved by HPC, that they would have to come back to the board. He noted that there was representation, made by the applicant, of the amount of co-workspace. MOTION:Mr. Moyer motioned to deny the Resolution which is written to amended section 11 of HPC Resolution #19, of 2018. Ms. Pitchford seconded. After Ms. Pitchford’s second, Ms. Adams asked for a pause for some time for the applicant team to convene and discuss if they would like to request a continuance. Mr. True noted that since there was a motion on the table it would need to be voted on after the pause or it would need to be withdrawn. Mr. Moyer withdrew his motion. Ms. Pitchford did not withdraw her second. Ms. Adams asked if the applicant had the opportunity to withdraw the application or ask for a continuance. Mr. True said yes, they had that right, but since there was still a motion on the table, it needed to be voted on at some point. Ms. Pitchford then withdrew her second. Mr. Halferty noted that they would take a five-minute break to allow the applicant team to discuss things. When the meeting resumed Ms. Adams explained why they were requesting a continuance. She said they just wanted some time to be thoughtful about percentages and to define what co-working means in order to come to an agreement about the conditions of approval. MOTION: Mr. Fornell motioned to continue this hearing to September 13 th, 2023. Mr. Halferty seconded. Roll call vote:Mr. Fornell, yes; Mr. Moyer, yes; Ms. Surfas, yes; Ms. Pitchford, yes; Mr. Warwick, no; Mr. Halferty, yes. 5-1 vote, motion passes. Ms. Simon wanted to set a deadline of September 6th for the applicant to provide their response to give staff enough time to address it. Mr. True left the meeting and Ms. Berne took over as counsel. Ms. Thompson re-entered the meeting. Ms. Simon noted that they were going to skip the staff presentation on historic preservation and affordable housing as it is practiced around the State and would schedule it for another time. They would move on to HPC’s preparation for the joint work session with City Council. NEW BUSINESS:Preparation for September 5th Joint HPC/City Council Work Session Ms. Simon mentioned that there had been a request to come to the meeting with an agenda to work with. Ms. Thompson started the board’s preparation discussion for their joint work session with Council. The board members contributed to the conversation with some of their ideas and potential questions they had for Council. One point of conversation to have with City Council was the perceived conflict between the desire for more density with affordable housing project and the Historic Preservation Guidelines. 9 REGULAR MEETING HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION AUGUST 23RD, 2023 The members wanted to get more clarity on City Council’s intentions with the new code updates and two step process, to better guide their efforts based on Council’s goals. Mr. Moyer also wanted to ask Council whether they think additions to historic assets in the last 20 years or so are overwhelming those assets. Another concern of Mr. Moyer was in the new process, HPC is not able to get a full picture of what is planned for the rest of an affordable housing project outside of the historic asset and he noted that HPC may make a decision about the historic asset, but that there could be unintended consequences for the surrounding neighborhood. At 7:00pm, Ms. Thompson moved to extend the meeting until 7:15pm. Mr. Moyer seconded. All in favor, motions passed. They continued their discussion. Ms. Simon wrote down the main thoughts and questions in an agenda to present to Council ahead of the meeting. ADJOURN: Ms. Thompson motioned to adjourn the regular meeting. Mr. Fornell seconded. All in favor; motion passes. ____________________ Mike Sear, Deputy City Clerk 10 REGULAR MEETING HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION SEPTEMBER 13TH, 2023 Chairperson Thompson opened the regular meeting of the Aspen Historic Preservation Commission at 4:30pm. Commissioners in attendance: Peter Fornell, Roger Moyer, Jodi Surfas, Barb Pitchford, Jeffrey Halferty and Kara Thompson. Absent was Kim Raymond and Riley Warwick. Staff present: Amy Simon, Planning Director Kirsten Armstrong, Principal Planner Historic Preservation Stuart Hayden, Planner - Historic Preservation Kate Johnson, AssistantCity Attorney Nicole Henning, City Clerk Tracy Terry, Deputy City Clerk MINUTES: Mr. Fornell motioned to approve the draft minutes from August 9 th, 2023. Mr. Moyer seconded. Roll Call Vote:Mr. Fornell, yes; Mr. Moyer, yes; Ms. Pitchford, abstained; Mr. Halferty, abstained; Ms. Thompson, yes. 3-0 with two abstaining, motion passes. Ms. Surfas entered the meeting at 4:33pm. PUBLIC COMMENTS: None COMMISSION MEMBER COMMENTS: Mr. Moyer asked Ms. Simon what was going on at the Gorsuch House at Lift 1A. Ms. Simon said that there were building permits submitted and in review. Ms. Pitchford asked about the old Johnny McGuire’s building, to which Ms. Simon mentioned it too had building permits submitted and in review but were moving very slowly. Mr. Halferty said it was good to see some activity at the old Main Street Bakery building. Mr. Moyer asked about maximum square footages for commercial spaces. Ms. Simon said there used to be a max commercial business size but that that was replaced with what is called Formula Use Standards. She described those. Ms. Surfas mentioned that she was recently in Louis, Delaware which is a beautiful town with many historic structures. She thought that town had butchered some of those structures and she commented that Aspen has done a great job. DISCLOSURE OF CONFLICTS OF INTEREST: Ms. Thompson noted that she was conflicted on the second agenda item and would leave the meeting for that item. Mr. Halferty would take over as Vice-Chair. Mr. Halferty stated that he had worked on the property to the west of the project, but it will not affect his ability to review this application. Ms. Johnson confirmed that she and Mr. Halferty had discussed this, and she did not believe it constituted a conflict of interest under the Municipal Code. PROJECT MONITORING: None. STAFF COMMENTS: Ms. Armstrong noted that the 9/27 HPC meeting would be cancelled. Ms. Simon mentioned that there is a tour at the Aspen Institute on Friday of the Herbert Bayer Kaleidoscreen. 11 REGULAR MEETING HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION SEPTEMBER 13TH, 2023 CERTIFICATE OF NO NEGATIVE EFFECT: None. CALL UP REPORTS: None. SUBMIT PUBLIC NOTICE FOR AGENDA ITEMS: Ms. Johnson said that she reviewed public notice, and that notice was provided per the code for both agenda items. Ms. Thompson left the meeting. Vice Chair Halferty took over the meeting for the first agenda item. OLD BUSINESS: 517 E. Hopkins Avenue – Substantial Amendment/GMQS, CONTINUE PUBLIC HEARING TO 10/25 MOTION: Mr. Halferty motioned to continue this hearing to October 25th, 2023. Mr. Fornell seconded. Roll call vote:Mr. Fornell, yes; Mr. Moyer, yes; Ms. Surfas, yes; Ms. Pitchford, yes; Mr. Halferty, yes. 5-0 vote, motion passes. OLD BUSINESS:820 E. Cooper Avenue - Conceptual Major Development, Relocation, Variation, TDRs - PUBLIC HEARING CONTINUED FROM AUGUST 9, 2023 Applicant Presentation:Sara Adams – Bendon Adams Ms. Adams introduced herself and the applicants and stated that they were back to present some revisions made to the project based on HPC comments at the last meeting. She thanked everyone that attended the site visit. She then let the applicants Lauren and Anton say a few words about themselves and the reasoning for the project. Ms. Adams went over the requests for major conceptual development, including digging a full basement, adding a small rear addition and one car garage. The resource would be lifted to dig the basement and then placed back in its original location, and they would also be demolishing the non- historic rear addition. She noted that based on HPC comments at the August meeting, they are no longer requesting the rear yard setback variation and have reduced the massing of the second floor. They are still requesting the 6.5-inch side yard variation in order to keep the historic resource in its original location. She also noted that in August they had requested HPC’s recommendation of 2 TDRs, but with the reduced massing they have enough square footage and are now requesting 3 TDRS. She moved on and showed a few pictures of similar properties in the area to provide some context. She also showed a rendering of their proposed project with the revision to the roof form. She then went over the proposed restoration efforts to occur. She showed and compared the proposed site plan that was presented at the August meeting and the revised one that they are presenting tonight. She detailed the revisions that had been made based on previous HPC comments. These included the front entry landing and the relocation of a lightwell. She detailed the site plan and floor plans, highlighting many elements of the project and went over the revisions to the rear addition that reduced the massing on the second floor to meet the 10-foot setback requirement. She then went over the changes to the gable roof form that was presented in August to respond to HPC comments. This still allows the stairway access but reduces the plat height and massing. 12 REGULAR MEETING HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION SEPTEMBER 13TH, 2023 She noted that, based on the updated renderings, the new addition is almost entirely hidden behind the historic resource. She presented the relevant design guidelines and noted that staff now finds that they have all been met. She said that they feel that they have responded to HPC comments from the last meeting related to the height and massing. She then went over the request for 3 TDRs. Mr. Fornell was glad to hear that they are no longer requesting a rear yard setback variation. Mr. Halferty asked about the shorter link and wondered if there was any discussion about this and the overhanging roof. He also asked about the proposed location of the lightwell on the east side and if it was to accommodate a bedroom. Ms. Adams said that since the building department now requires railings instead of grates on lightwells it seemed better to have them all on one side of the building. Ms. Pitchford asked if the outside stairway would be visible from in front of the historic resource. The applicant’s architect said it would be very difficult to see due to being tucked behind the historic resource and blocked by a few trees. Mr. Halferty asked what type of railing was proposed for the exterior stairs. The architect said a very simple metal railing to potentially match the guard rails on the lightwells. Staff Presentation:Kirsten Armstrong, Principal Planner Historic Preservation Ms. Armstrong started by describing the property and lot and went over the applicant’s proposal of the relocation of the historic resource in order to dig a full basement, the demolition of a non-historic addition, the construction of a connector and new addition on the north side of the property and some small landscaping updates. With this they are requesting approval of major conceptual development, relocation, a west side yard setback variation and HPC’s recommendation to City Council for 3 TDRs. She went over current details of the historic resource and the recent restoration efforts by the applicants. She then described the details of the roof form of the proposed rear addition, the proposed 6’ 1” connector and the lightwells grouped on the east side. She noted that due to the elimination of grates from building code, guard rails are being proposed. She said the staff supports grouping the lightwells on the east side to minimize the visual impact. Next, she noted that the proposed addition is a product of its own time while some design elements are sympathetic to the historic resource per design guideline 10.6. She went over the reasoning to support this. She said that while the proposed addition is taller than the historic resource, the massing is deferential and does not fully mimic the historic resource as a larger copy. She said it is staff’s opinion that the updates to the addition from the last meeting have brought it in line with design guidelines 10.3, 10.4 and 10.8. While the proposed addition does not fully meet guideline 10.9 in providing a full 10-foot connector, staff feels the design provides a compromise in meeting the site constraints and the design guidelines. Staff recommends approval of the conceptual major development but does recommend it as a point of discussion. She showed the north elevation and noted that with the redesign, it now meets the setbacks of 5 feet for the garage and 10 feet for the second story. Regarding relocation, she said that the historic resource will be temporarily relocated while the basement is excavated, and it will then be placed back in its historic location. She said the staff finds the 13 REGULAR MEETING HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION SEPTEMBER 13TH, 2023 criteria for relocation to be met conditioned on a letter from an engineer stating that the building can withstand relocation. Next, she went over the details of the west side yard setback variation request that is triggered by the relocation and said the staff supports the requested variation as it preserves the resource’s original location. She then went over details of the request of a recommendation to City Council for approval of 3 TDRs that would sever 750 square feet from the site. She noted the total allowable development rights for the lot and said that from the applicant’s representation there will be enough floor area remaining for this request. She said that staff finds the criteria for establishing the TDRs to be met. She noted that staff is recommending some conditions of approval that include details that they would like to see at final review, but overall, staff recommends HPC approval of the Land Use Review with conditions. Ms. Johnson asked Mr. Halferty to confirm he was not present at the August 9 th meeting. Mr. Halferty said he was not but had reviewed the minutes. Ms. Johnson said that she believed he could still act as chair but that he was not in a position to vote as he did not have all the same information as the other members or what the applicant presented at the August 9 th meeting. Ms. Pitchford mentioned that she too was not present at the August 9th meeting but had read the minutes and had attended the site visit. Ms. Johnson said that historically they ask that members listen to the recording of the meeting, but since she herself was not present at the August 9th meeting, she was not aware of the two members absence. Ms. Simon noted that the applicant did not have any objections to their participation. Ms. Johnson said she would like to stay consistent with what has been done in the past but would wait to see how things played out to see if they were or were not able to take action. Mr. Halferty and Ms. Pitchford noted that they had both reviewed the packet from the August 9 th meeting in addition to reading the minutes. Knowing that Ms. Johnson said she felt both Mr. Halferty and Ms. Pitchford could vote as they both had the same information as the other members. Mr. Fornell noted that it seemed that the first eight conditions of approval related to things that would come up at final review. Ms. Armstrong confirmed that and said they are there to provide direction for things staff would like to see at final review. Mr. Fornell asked if they had to be included in this conceptual major development resolution. Ms. Armstrong said not necessarily. Ms. Johnson went over how this resolution process would go in relation to the final major development resolution. Mr. Fornell said he was satisfied. PUBLIC COMMENTS: None. BOARD DISCUSSION: Mr. Halferty listed the items for board discussion, being the relocation, setback variation, recommendation of TDRs, mass and form, conditions of approval and the various design guidelines. Mr. Fornell started by commending the applicant for leaving 750 square feet of allowable floor area off this lot as it respects the historic resource and is great example of the use of TDRs. He noted the 14 REGULAR MEETING HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION SEPTEMBER 13TH, 2023 property to the east that was the same size lot yet went to the full use of their floor area ratio and ended up being significantly larger and stood over the historic resource. He said he would be supporting this. Ms. Pitchford complemented the applicant as well and appreciated that it would be lived in. She agreed with Mr. Fornell about the TDRs in this case. She believed that the design of the addition still preserves the feel of the miner’s cabin visually from the street. She said she would be in support as well. Ms. Surfas thanked the applicant for taking what was said at the last hearing and making updates to the plans. She said that with the changes to the roof form and the overall updated design, they have a great house. She also appreciated that locals will be living in the house and raising their family. She was in support of the project and what had been done. Mr. Moyer said that many times when a project comes back to HPC with updates based on feedback from the members, that they end up getting a better project. He congratulated the applicants and said that he was in support of the project. Mr. Halferty thought the applicant and staff had done an excellent job getting the project to conform to the guidelines. He was in support of the TDRs and appreciated the restoration efforts made by the applicants. He thought the design and roof form of the addition complimented the historic resource. He was in support of the project. MOTION: Mr. Fornell motioned to approve the resolution as presented by staff. Ms. Pitchford seconded. Mr. Moyer commented to staff about the TDRs. He wanted to make sure the letter to City Council regarding HPC’s recommendation of the TDRs stated that this was an excellent example of the use of TDRs. Roll call vote:Mr. Fornell, yes; Mr. Moyer, yes; Ms. Surfas, yes; Ms. Pitchford, yes; Mr. Halferty, yes. 5-0 vote, motion passes. NEW BUSINESS:Follow up discussion: Joint HPC/City Council Work Session Ms. Simon started the discussion by recapping the joint work session with City Council. She said that one of her takeaways was that City Council members generally expressed a strong desire to maximize affordable housing and did not want to abandon the new process that has been adopted. She mentioned a few other discussion items from the meeting including the design guidelines and TDRs. Ms. Pitchford said she did not feel that all Council members were as adamant about maximizing affordable housing by sacrificing a historic resource. Ms. Thompson did not believe anyone said “sacrifice” the resource, rather that there is a different balance that should be expected around historic resources for affordable housing projects. She did think that a few council members wanted the HPC to potentially have more input on how the massing gets balanced. She said that while any Land Use Code amendments would be a very complicated and long process, the HPC could amend design guidelines and application requirements. Ms. Johnson said that amending the design guidelines could be done by resolution, which is a somewhat simpler process. 15 REGULAR MEETING HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION SEPTEMBER 13TH, 2023 Ms. Thompson said that she only felt that Councilor Guth was potentially in favor of Land Use Code amendments and that she was not in favor of that route. She went over some of her reasoning for this. She believed that the new process was put in place for a reason, and she referenced the 1020 E Cooper project that, under the previous public hearing process took 18 months to get through HPC review and that was not fair to any applicant. She also believed that the new process had not been in place long enough to make a good judgement on it. Mr. Fornell noted that he felt that Council members knew that historic resources were in the R6 district when they made affordable housing projects a use by right in all zone districts. Ms. Pitchford asked what the next steps would be from Council and Mr. Fornell said he believed that the Council members would discuss HPC’s comments amongst themselves either in an executive session or a work session and get back to HPC. Ms. Thompson said she felt Council wanted more information from staff on a few items and that the HPC members would discuss what they would propose to them as far as potential adjustments to guidelines and things that might help this new process. She said she would like HPC to discuss the conceptual site plan, which is already a requirement and potentially requiring more detail on the presented footprint detailing where any additional structures would be. She also wanted to discuss potentially adding massing guidelines for affordable housing projects to be added to the current process. Ms. Simon presented and read the section of the Land Use Code that was being discussed and highlighted the language that a conceptual site plan must be provided to assist in HPC’s review. She noted that in the last project, the applicant provided a site plan that included the footprint of the new construction, and that the footprint would be a binding representation and the applicant could not come to the staff and monitor review step with anything different that was originally seen by HPC. She also mentioned that the City still has not seen an application for the next review step and that it would not be an easy process. She said that staff and HPC Chair would not necessarily accept what was presented and asked for the board members to have some faith in them to represent the entire HPC board. Mr. Fornell asked when a project is in the staff and HPC chair review step if the Chair could consult with the other HPC board members if they felt struck on something. Ms. Simon said that the process was created to fast track a good project that met certain criteria and that if the staff member and HPC Chair does not approve something, the applicant could pull the application and apply under the previous process of a full HPC review. Ms. Thompson brought the discussion back to getting some agreement on some guidelines for affordable housing projects that are in dense zone districts as the current guidelines tend to deal mostly with less dense residential zones. Ms. Simon said that staff could look at and review the current Historic Preservation design guideline book to see if there are any holes. Ms. Thompson said the idea would be to add guidelines to this type of project that would make the HPC members more confident in staff and monitor applying them to the additional structure. 16 REGULAR MEETING HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION SEPTEMBER 13TH, 2023 Mr. Moyer brought up the idea of the total allowable floor area on a lot and thought that maybe there could be a way that HPC could control that. He expressed his thoughts that many historic resources are preserved but end up having an overwhelming structure behind them. Ms. Pitchford said that the allowable floor area lies within the Land Use Code and if you wanted to change the it, you would have to change the Land Use Code. Ms. Simon said that the total allowable floor area amounts per zone district were developed back in the 60’s or 70’s and have been so engrained in the community that it would be impossible to take them back. There was some discussion on this idea. Mr. Moyer thought it would be a good idea if some type of informational guide be put together going over all the good things the HPC has done over the years in an effort to better overall preservation. This could act as a guide for new developers, architects, realtors, etc. There was some discussion about what this might look like and what it might contain. Ms. Thompson suggested looking into requesting an applicant provide “story poles” on major development projects as they can be a big help. Ms. Simon said she was not sure if HPC could require them but that they could ask for anything that helps with their review. ADJOURN: Ms. Thompson motioned to adjourn the regular meeting. Ms. Pitchford seconded. All in favor; motion passes. ____________________ Mike Sear, Deputy City Clerk 17 Page 1 of 3 130 South Galena Street Aspen, CO 81611-1975 | P: 970.920.5197 | cityofaspen.com MEMORANDUM TO: Aspen Historic Preservation Commission FROM: Amy Simon, Planning Director MEETING DATE: October 25, 2023 RE: 110 W. Main Street - Project Monitoring BACKGROUND: 110 W. Main Street is currently under construction as a redevelopment of the former Hotel Aspen. The approved project includes construction of a new hotel building, facing Main Street and located within the Main Street Historic District, and three residential style structures facing Bleeker Street, which are outside of the district. The Historic Preservation Commission (HPC) reviewed the full development, but the current discussion is focused on the hotel. The project review history is long, and after the HPC’s last approval in 2016, there was an extension of Vested Rights by Council, and two Insubstantial PD amendments granted administratively for various adjustments to the interior and exterior of the hotel, completed in consultation with HPC monitors. In 2022, the property changed hands and architects. In late 2022, staff and HPC monitor Jeff Halferty reviewed additional revisions to exterior materials. Throughout the process, the hotel building has been a mix of brick, concrete, wood and metal. The most recent discussion in Fall 2022 allowed for new material specifications and applications, still generally in keeping with previous concepts. However, one important change occurred at that point, which was the change from the approved use of wood for the curved rainscreen, at the southeast entry, to a glazed terracotta. Terracotta is a masonry material, which in essence is consistent with the historic district. In retrospect, the glazed finish arguably reduced the relationship to the surroundings. Nonetheless, the glazed terracotta material was approved and is part of an issued building permit. Recently, the property owner approached staff and monitor again with changes that are explained in Attachment B. Please note that the attachment is extensive, with product specs for each material. The material changes overall are subtle and have to do with challenges in sourcing materials from particular suppliers. Staff and monitor declined to approve the changes, primarily because of a concern that the coloring of some of the revised materials resulted in a change of tone that does not reinforce the nature of the historic district. More importantly, staff and monitor declined to approve because another amendment to the entry rainscreen, this time from glazed terracotta to painted metal, continues to bring the project further away from the original approvals and its connection to the character of the historic district. Initially, this development was more of a remodel of the previous Hotel Aspen and retained a street-facing portion of the building. Late in the review process the proposal evolved to a full 18 Page 2 of 3 130 South Galena Street Aspen, CO 81611-1975 | P: 970.920.5197 | cityofaspen.com demolition, but still reconstructed the massing of the previous structure, including the curved corner element. Staff questioned allowing this at the time, because of the missed opportunity to strengthen the relationship of the new structure with the Main Street Historic District and its context. With this latest proposed change in materials, staff remains concerned with response to context. In addition, staff is uncertain whether the proposed painted screen will aggravate reflection and light spill from the highly illuminated lobby over the condition already permitted with the glazed terracotta. Physical samples of the approved and proposed materials will be provided at the meeting and are expected to be informative to the discussion, better representing the effect of the project than renderings alone. The General Commercial Design Guidelines and Guidelines for the Main Street Historic District pertinent to this discussion are: 1.23 Building materials shall have these features: • Convey the quality and range of materials found in the current block context or seen historically in the Character Area. • Convey pedestrian scale. • Enhance visual interest through texture, application, and/or dimension. • Be non-reflective. Shiny or glossy materials are not appropriate as a primary material. • Have proven durability and weathering characteristics within Aspen’s climate. • A material with an integral color shall be a neutral color. Some variation is allowed for secondary materials. 1.24 Introducing a new material, material application, or material finish to the existing streetscape may be approved by HPC or P&Z if the following criteria are met: • Innovative building design. • Creative material application that positively contributes to the streetscape. • Environmentally sustainable building practice. • Proven durability. 3.2 Design a new structure to be recognized as a product of its time. • Consider these three aspects of a new building; form, materials, and fenestration. A project should relate strongly to the historic district in at least two of these elements. Departing from one of these categories allows for creativity and a contemporary design response. o When choosing to relate to building form, use forms that are similar to the historic district. o When choosing to relate to materials, use materials that appear similar in scale and finish to those used historically in the district and use building materials that contribute to a traditional sense of human scale. o When choosing to relate to fenestration, use windows and doors that are similar in size and shape to those in the historic district. 19 Page 3 of 3 130 South Galena Street Aspen, CO 81611-1975 | P: 970.920.5197 | cityofaspen.com 3.10 Use building components that are similar in size and shape to those of the Victorian-era residences seen traditionally on Main Street. • These include windows, doors, and porches. • Overall, details should be modest in character. 3.11 Architectural details should reinforce the historic context of the block. • Consider how detailing can be used to create relationships between new and old buildings while still allowing for current architectural expression. • Consider scale, location, and purpose of historic detailing to inform new designs. • It is inappropriate to imitate historic details. 3.12 Primary materials should be wood or brick. • Alternate primary materials may be considered on a case-by-case basis depending on the historic context of the block. 3.13 Secondary materials should relate to the historic context. • More variety is acceptable for secondary materials if a relationship to the historic palette can be demonstrated. • Stone should be limited to the foundation. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that, after review of physical samples, HPC provide direction to the project monitor committee regarding amendments to material selection. ATTACHMENTS: A. Photo of materials approved in Fall 2022 B. Applicant proposal 20 From:Amy Simon To:Amy Simon Subject:110 w main materials Date:Saturday, November 26, 2022 8:49:24 AM Sent from my iPhone 21 300 SO SPRING ST | 202 | ASPEN, CO 81611 970.925.2855 | BENDONADAMS.COM October 10, 2023 City of Aspen Aspen Historic Preservation Commission Re: 110 West Main Street – Materials for Project Monitor Review Dear HPC, Please accept this request for project monitor review of new materials for the White Elephant, aka Hotel Aspen, project. The HP monitor and HP Staff approved the material palette provided in Exhibit A. Manufacturing wait times, installation, longevity, and cost result in the owners requesting a slight change to some of the materials as noted in Exhibit B. The proposed materials use application, siding direction, and subtle details to break the buildings into modules that contribute to the pedestrian experience and historic district as a whole. The HP monitor decided the material was moving too far from the traditional historic district and decided to push the discussion up to the full board rather than approve the changes. Physical samples will be provided at the hearing on 10/25. Request The hotel is approved to have a mix of wood (painted and stained), brick, and metal details. White Elephant proposes the following material changes: South elevation (Main Street) • Aluminum sunscreen replaces satin glazed terracotta rainscreen at corner entry. Metal is more durable in this high traffic area and installation details are simplified. Figure 1: Approved terra cotta entry (left) proposed metal rainscreen entry (right). 22 Page 2 of 4 Wood species and manufacturer change throughout project • Change in manufacturer and wood species from New Zealand Abodo to American Ash (locally sourced). • Same finish and performance as approved. Brick manufacturer change throughout project • Change from Glen Gery to Endicott for supply issues. • Similar texture and profile. • Dark grout. Metal siding manufacturer change throughout project • Change from Pure + Freeform to Metal Sales for supply issues. • Similar matte black finish to approved throughout project. Metal screen at stair supplier change throughout project • Change from Revamp panels to Custom Fabrication. • Custom Fabrication provides better control over design and locally fabricated. Metal roof (residences along Bleeker only) manufacturer change • Change from Rheinzink to Morin because original approved product discontinued. • Similar finish to approved standing seam metal roof. Change of pivot doors to outswing doors on ground level • Pivot doors have waterproofing issues and cannot be keyed properly for the hotel. • Outswing doors look the same but provide operational control and guest safety. Figure 2: Approved materials along Garmisch Street. 23 Page 3 of 4 Applicable Design Guidelines for Main Street HD 3.10 Use building components that are similar in size and shape to those of the Victorian-era residences seen traditionally on Main Street. • These include windows, doors, and porches. • Overall, details should be modest in character. The approved size and shape of the materials is not proposed to change. 3.11 Architectural details should reinforce the historic context of the block. • Consider how detailing can be used to create relationships between new and old buildings while still allowing for current architectural expression. • Consider scale, location, and purpose of historic detailing to inform new designs. • It is inappropriate to imitate historic details. Details are simple but still interesting for a new hotel within the historic district. Changing from terra cotta to metal at the entrance is more consistent with the historic district materials and is more durable in this high traffic area. 3.12 Primary materials should be wood or brick. • Alternate primary materials may be considered on a case-by-case basis depending on the historic context of the block. Figure 3: Proposed materials along Garmisch Street. 24 Page 4 of 4 Primary materials are not proposed to change – amendments to the manufacturer are proposed with slight tweaks to the color of the brick and wood as shown in Exhibit B. 3.13 Secondary materials should relate to the historic context. • More variety is acceptable for secondary materials if a relationship to the historic palette can be demonstrated. • Stone should be limited to the foundation. No change to the approved secondary materials, only the manufacturer with slight tweaks to the finish. 3.14 Use roofing materials that are similar in appearance to those seen historically. No change to the approved roof materials, only the manufacturer with slight tweaks to the finish. We will have physical samples of the materials to present to HPC at the meeting. All proposed materials reflect the traditional materials found in the Main Street Historic District – wood, brick, and metal are found on both historic and non-historic building along the corridor. We look forward to hearing your thoughts on the material palette. Sincerely, Sara Adams sara@bendonadams.com 970-925-2855 Exhibits A – Approved material palette B - Proposed material changes C – Proposed material cut sheets 25 110 West Main Street ASPEN CO NEW ENGLAND DEVELOPMENT EXTERIOR VIEWS AND ELEVATIONS OCTObER 5, 2022 APPROVED 26 1 2 3 4 7 5 6 AF B G C H DE 110 WEST MAIN ST | NEW ENgLAND DEVELOPMENT | E XTERIOR VIEWS AND ELEVATIONS | OCTObER 5, 2022 | 2 27 1 110 WEST MAIN ST | NEW ENgLAND DEVELOPMENT | E XTERIOR VIEWS AND ELEVATIONS | OCTObER 5, 2022 | 3 28 2 110 WEST MAIN ST | NEW ENgLAND DEVELOPMENT | E XTERIOR VIEWS AND ELEVATIONS | OCTObER 5, 2022 | 4 29 3 110 WEST MAIN ST | NEW ENgLAND DEVELOPMENT | E XTERIOR VIEWS AND ELEVATIONS | OCTObER 5, 2022 | 5 30 4 110 WEST MAIN ST | NEW ENgLAND DEVELOPMENT | E XTERIOR VIEWS AND ELEVATIONS | OCTObER 5, 2022 | 6 31 5 110 WEST MAIN ST | NEW ENgLAND DEVELOPMENT | E XTERIOR VIEWS AND ELEVATIONS | OCTObER 5, 2022 | 7 32 6 110 WEST MAIN ST | NEW ENgLAND DEVELOPMENT | E XTERIOR VIEWS AND ELEVATIONS | OCTObER 5, 2022 | 8 33 7 110 WEST MAIN ST | NEW ENgLAND DEVELOPMENT | E XTERIOR VIEWS AND ELEVATIONS | OCTObER 5, 2022 | 9 34 ELEVATIONS 110 WEST MAIN ST | NEW ENgLAND DEVELOPMENT | EXTERIOR VIEWS AND ELEVATIONS | OCTObER 5, 2022 | 10 35 SHILDAN TERRACOTTA RAINSCREEN LAMELLE BAGUETTE WHITE SATIN GLAZE FINISH PURA NFC SIDING 6” VERTICAL RAINSCREEN FRENCH WALNUT PU14 GLEN GERY | SIOUX CITY BRICK ROMAN MAXIMUS FLINT HILLS RESAWN TIMBER CO. ABODO VULCAN CLADDING SIOO:X (T&G) 8” EXPOSURE REVAMP PANELS ARCHITECTURAL METAL SCREEN CUSTOM PATTERN | WHITE FINISH PURE+FREEFORM METAL PANEL GLOSS BLACK EXTERIOR MATERIALS DIAGRAM PURE+FREEFORM METAL PANEL HOLLYWOOD BLACK (EM017) A 110 WEST MAIN ST | NEW ENgLAND DEVELOPMENT | E XTERIOR VIEWS AND ELEVATIONS | OCTObER 5, 2022 | 11 36 B PURA NFC SIDING 6” VERTICAL RAINSCREEN FRENCH WALNUT PU14 GLEN GERY | SIOUX CITY BRICK ROMAN MAXIMUS FLINT HILLS 110 WEST MAIN ST | NEW ENgLAND DEVELOPMENT | E XTERIOR VIEWS AND ELEVATIONS | OCTObER 5, 2022 | 12 SHILDAN TERRACOTTA RAINSCREEN LAMELLE BAGUETTE WHITE SATIN GLAZE FINISH RESAWN TIMBER CO. ABODO VULCAN CLADDING SIOO:X (T&G) 8” EXPOSURE PURE+FREEFORM METAL PANEL HOLLYWOOD BLACK (EM017) 37 PURA NFC SIDING 6” VERTICAL RAINSCREEN FRENCH WALNUT PU14 GLEN GERY | SIOUX CITY BRICK ROMAN MAXIMUS FLINT HILLS GLEN GERY | SIOUX CITY BRICK ROMAN MAXIMUS FLINT HILLS RESAWN TIMBER CO. ABODO VULCAN CLADDING SIOO:X (T&G) 8” EXPOSURE PURE+FREEFORM METAL PANEL GLOSS BLACK PURE+FREEFORM METAL PANEL HOLLYWOOD BLACK (EM017) C 110 WEST MAIN ST | NEW ENgLAND DEVELOPMENT | EXTERIOR VIEWS AND ELEVATIONS | OCTObER 5, 2022 | 13 38 D GLEN GERY | SIOUX CITY BRICK ROMAN MAXIMUS FLINT HILLS GLEN GERY | SIOUX CITY BRICK ROMAN MAXIMUS FLINT HILLS RESAWN TIMBER CO. ABODO VULCAN CLADDING SIOO:X (T&G) 8” EXPOSURE PURE+FREEFORM METAL PANEL HOLLYWOOD BLACK (EM017) REVAMP PANELS ARCHITECTURAL METAL SCREEN CUSTOM PATTERN | WHITE FINISH 110 WEST MAIN ST | NEW ENgLAND DEVELOPMENT | E XTERIOR VIEWS AND ELEVATIONS | OCTObER 5, 2022 | 14 39 E RHEINZINK METAL PANEL STANDING SEAM PANEL GLEN GERY | SIOUX CITY BRICK ROMAN MAXIMUS FLINT HILLS RESAWN TIMBER CO. ABODO VULCAN HORIZONTAL SLAT SIOO:X (S4S) 4” EXPOSURE RESAWN TIMBER CO. ABODO VULCAN VETICAL SLAT NERO (S4S) 1” EXPOSURE PURE+FREEFORM METAL PANEL HOLLYWOOD BLACK (EM017) 110 WEST MAIN ST | NEW ENgLAND DEVELOPMENT | E XTERIOR VIEWS AND ELEVATIONS | OCTObER 5, 2022 | 15 40 F HF HRHEINZINK METAL PANEL STANDING SEAM PANEL PURA NFC SIDING 6” VERTICAL RAINSCREEN SLATE EBONY PU22 RESAWN TIMBER CO. ABODO VULCAN HORIZONTAL SLAT SIOO:X (S4S) 4” EXPOSURE RESAWN TIMBER CO. ABODO VULCAN VETICAL SLAT NERO (S4S) 1” EXPOSURE 110 WEST MAIN ST | NEW ENgLAND DEVELOPMENT | E XTERIOR VIEWS AND ELEVATIONS | OCTObER 5, 2022 | 16 41 G RESAWN TIMBER CO. ABODO VULCAN VETICAL SLAT NERO (S4S) 1” EXPOSURE PURA NFC SIDING 6” VERTICAL RAINSCREEN SLATE EBONY PU22 110 WEST MAIN ST | NEW ENgLAND DEVELOPMENT | EXTERIOR VIEWS AND ELEVATIONS | OCTObER 5, 2022 | 17 RESAWN TIMBER CO. ABODO VULCAN HORIZONTAL SLAT SIOO:X (S4S) 4” EXPOSURE 42 110 West Main Street ASPEN CO NEW ENGLAND DEVELOPMENT EXTERIOR VIEWS AND ELEVATIONS OCTOBER 17, 2023 Exhibit B PROPOSED 43 1 2 3 4 7 5 6 AF B G C H DE 110 WEST MAIN ST | NEW ENgLAND DEVELOPMENT | EXTERIOR VIEWS AND ELEVATIONS | OCTOBER 17, 2023 | 2 44 1 110 WEST MAIN ST | NEW ENgLAND DEVELOPMENT | EXTERIOR VIEWS AND ELEVATIONS | OCTOBER 17, 2023 | 3 45 2 110 WEST MAIN ST | NEW ENgLAND DEVELOPMENT | EXTERIOR VIEWS AND ELEVATIONS | OCTOBER 17, 2023 | 4 46 3 110 WEST MAIN ST | NEW ENgLAND DEVELOPMENT | EXTERIOR VIEWS AND ELEVATIONS | OCTOBER 17, 2023 | 5 47 4 110 WEST MAIN ST | NEW ENgLAND DEVELOPMENT | EXTERIOR VIEWS AND ELEVATIONS | OCTOBER 17, 2023 | 6 48 5 110 WEST MAIN ST | NEW ENgLAND DEVELOPMENT | EXTERIOR VIEWS AND ELEVATIONS | OCTOBER 17, 2023 | 7 49 6 110 WEST MAIN ST | NEW ENgLAND DEVELOPMENT | EXTERIOR VIEWS AND ELEVATIONS | OCTOBER 17, 2023 | 8 50 7 110 WEST MAIN ST | NEW ENgLAND DEVELOPMENT | EXTERIOR VIEWS AND ELEVATIONS | OCTOBER 17, 2023 | 9 51 ELEVATIONS 110 WEST MAIN ST | NEW ENgLAND DEVELOPMENT | EXTERIOR VIEWS AND ELEVATIONS | OCTOBER 17, 2023 | 10 52 Summary of Material Changes CHANGE OF MATERIAL FROM TERRACOTTA SUNSCREEN TO ALUMINUM SUNSCREEN AT ENTRY • Provides more elegant detailing and increased durability for high traffic area. CHANGE OF WOOD SPECIES AND MANUFACTURER FOR HORIZONTAL WOOD SIDING • The selected manufacturer was changed from ReSawn Timber to ArborWood and the wood species from thermally modified New Zeland Abodo to American Ash • The new wood species is locally sourced while maintaining the same finish and performance characteristics of the original specification. CHANGE OF MANUFACTURER FOR BRICK VENEER • The selected manufacturer has been changed from glen gery to Endicott Brick for supply issues. • Endicott Brick can provide similar texture and profile (Roman Brick 2 x 12) CHANGE OF MANUFACTURER FOR METAL SIDING • The selected manufacturer has been changed from Pure+Freeform to Metal Sales for supply issues. • Metal Sales can provide similar Matte Black finish for metal panels throughout. CHANGE OF SUPPLIER FOR ARCHITECTURAL METAL SCREEN AT STAIR • The selected manufacturer has been changed from Revamp Panels to a Custom Fabrication. • The Custom Fabrication allows for greater control over the design and can be locally fabricated. CHANGE OF MANUFACTURER FOR METAL ROOFING AT RESIDENCES • The manufacturer has changed from Rheinzink to Morin because the original spec was discontinued. • Morin can provide similar finish for the standing seam metal roofing. CHANGE OF PIVOT DOORS TO OUTSWING DOORS AT THE GROUND FLOOR • The initially proposed pivot doors have waterproofing performance issues and cannot be keyed for fob access and are not operationally feasible for a hotel application. The proposed change allows for better performance and operational control and safety. 110 WEST MAIN ST | NEW ENgLAND DEVELOPMENT | EXTERIOR VIEWS AND ELEVATIONS | OCTOBER 17, 2023 | 11 53 CONSTRUCTION SPECIALTIES ALUMINUM LINEAR SUNSCREEN 8” AFB AIRFOIL – WHITE SEMI GLOSS PURA NFC SIDING 6” VERTICAL RAINSCREEN FRENCH WALNUT PU14 ENDICOTT VELOUR BRICK TWO-COLOR BLEND (LIGHT GREY | GREY) ROMAN BRICK (2” X 12”) ARBOR WOOD CO CUSTOM SIOO:X FINISH OYSTER GREY 8” EXPOSURE ARCHITECTURAL METAL SCREEN CUSTOM STEEL FABRICATION WHITE FINISH METAL SALES METAL PANEL MATTE BLACK (106) EXTERIOR MATERIALS DIAGRAM METAL SALES METAL PANEL MATTE BLACK (106) A SUNVENT INDUSTRIES CUSTOM METAL LOUVER 8” MATTE BLACK 110 WEST MAIN ST | NEW ENgLAND DEVELOPMENT | EXTERIOR VIEWS AND ELEVATIONS | OCTOBER 17, 2023 | 12 54 GARMISH STREET ELEVATION MODIFICATION ORIGINALLY PROPOSED ELEVATION 10/04/2022 REVISED ELEVATION 10/16/2023 110 WEST MAIN ST | NEW ENgLAND DEVELOPMENT | EXTERIOR VIEWS AND ELEVATIONS | OCTOBER 17, 2023 | 13 55 B ARBOR WOOD CO CUSTOM SIOO:X FINISH OYSTER GREY 8” EXPOSURE ENDICOTT VELOUR BRICK TWO-COLOR BLEND (LIGHT GREY | GREY) ROMAN BRICK (2” X 12”) PURA NFC SIDING 6” VERTICAL RAINSCREEN FRENCH WALNUT PU14 METAL SALES METAL PANEL MATTE BLACK (106) CONSTRUCTION SPECIALTIES ALUMINUM LINEAR SUNSCREEN 8” AFB AIRFOIL – WHITE SEMI GLOSS 110 WEST MAIN ST | NEW ENgLAND DEVELOPMENT | EXTERIOR VIEWS AND ELEVATIONS | OCTOBER 17, 2023 | 14 56 C ARBOR WOOD CO CUSTOM SIOO:X FINISH OYSTER GREY 8” EXPOSURE ENDICOTT VELOUR BRICK TWO-COLOR BLEND (LIGHT GREY | GREY) ROMAN BRICK (2” X 12”) PURA NFC SIDING 6” VERTICAL RAINSCREEN FRENCH WALNUT PU14 ENDICOTT VELOUR BRICK TWO-COLOR BLEND (LIGHT GREY | GREY) ROMAN BRICK (2” X 12”) 110 WEST MAIN ST | NEW ENgLAND DEVELOPMENT | EXTERIOR VIEWS AND ELEVATIONS | OCTOBER 17, 2023 | 15 METAL SALES METAL PANEL MATTE BLACK (106) METAL SALES METAL PANEL MATTE BLACK (106) 57 D ARCHITECTURAL METAL SCREEN CUSTOM STEEL FABRICATION WHITE FINISH ARBOR WOOD CO CUSTOM SIOO:X FINISH OYSTER GREY 8” EXPOSURE ENDICOTT VELOUR BRICK TWO-COLOR BLEND (LIGHT GREY | GREY) ROMAN BRICK (2” X 12”) ENDICOTT VELOUR BRICK TWO-COLOR BLEND (LIGHT GREY | GREY) ROMAN BRICK (2” X 12”) 110 WEST MAIN ST | NEW ENgLAND DEVELOPMENT | EXTERIOR VIEWS AND ELEVATIONS | OCTOBER 17, 2023 | 16 METAL SALES METAL PANEL MATTE BLACK (106) 58 E MORIN METAL PANELS SYMMETRY SERIES (SYM-12-0) CHAMPAGNE GOLD ARBOR WOOD CO BRNSH - BURNED AND BRUSHED BLACK OIL FINISH 1” EXPOSURE METAL SALES METAL PANEL MATTE BLACK (106) ENDICOTT VELOUR BRICK TWO-COLOR BLEND (LIGHT GREY | GREY) ROMAN BRICK (2” X 12”) ARBOR WOOD CO CUSTOM SIOO:X FINISH OYSTER GREY 3.5” EXPOSURE 110 WEST MAIN ST | NEW ENgLAND DEVELOPMENT | E XTERIOR VIEWS AND ELEVATIONS | OCTOBER 17, 2023 | 17 59 F HF HMORIN METAL PANELS SYMMETRY SERIES (SYM-12-0) CHAMPAGNE GOLD PURA NFC SIDING 6” VERTICAL RAINSCREEN SLATE EBONY PU22 ARBOR WOOD CO CUSTOM SIOO:X FINISH OYSTER GREY 3.5” EXPOSURE ARBOR WOOD CO BRNSH - BURNED AND BRUSHED BLACK OIL FINISH 1” EXPOSURE 110 WEST MAIN ST | NEW ENgLAND DEVELOPMENT | EXTERIOR VIEWS AND ELEVATIONS | OCTOBER 17, 2023 | 18 60 G ARBOR WOOD CO BRNSH - BURNED AND BRUSHED BLACK OIL FINISH 1” EXPOSURE PURA NFC SIDING 6” VERTICAL RAINSCREEN SLATE EBONY PU22 110 WEST MAIN ST | NEW ENgLAND DEVELOPMENT | EXTERIOR VIEWS AND ELEVATIONS | OCTOBER 17, 2023 | 19 ARBOR WOOD CO CUSTOM SIOO:X FINISH OYSTER GREY 3.5” EXPOSURE 61 ENDICOTT BRICK 110 WEST MAIN ST | ENDICOTT brICk | CUTSHEETS | SEpTEMbEr 8, 2023 | 1 Exhibit C 62 FACE BRICK BUILD YOUR LEGACY The essence of beauty and design begins with the natural elegance and strength of brick. Formed from iron-rich clays, the unique character, sheen and colors of Endicott face brick help you tell a story and define your legacy. 63 LAYING THE FOUNDATION FOR GREATNESS. THE WARM AESTHETIC APPEAL AND TRUE PERMANENCE OF ENDICOTT FACE BRICK PROVIDE A SOLID FOUNDATION FOR DESIGNING AND BUILDING GREAT SPACES THAT STAND THE TEST OF TIME. FORMED FROM ABUNDANT IRON-RICH MATERIALS, ENDICOTT FACE BRICK HAVE BEEN HELPING VISIONARIES BUILD LEGACIES FROM THE GROUND UP MORE THAN 100 YEARS. Brick Color: Manganese Ironspot Arrive Hotel – Austin , TX 64 MARYSVILLE KANSAS PROJECT DETAILS Medium Ironspot #46 COLOR Modular Shapes SIZE Velour TEXTURE ST. GREGORY THE GREAT CATHOLIC CHURCH 65 KANSAS CITY MISSOURI DEBRUCE HALL KC ART INSTITUTE PROJECT DETAILS Manganese Ironspot COLOR Modular Shapes SIZE Velour TEXTURE 66 BALTIMORE MARYLAND PROJECT DETAILS PEABODY WALK LOFTS Ravenswood Ironspot COLOR Modular Shapes SIZE Velour TEXTURE 67 CHICAGO ILLINOIS PROJECT DETAILS Desert Ironspot Light Medium Ironspot #77 COLOR EAST PRAIRIE ELEMENTARY Utility SIZE Smooth Artisan TEXTURE 68 BOZEMAN MONTANA PROJECT DETAILS Manganese Ironspot COLOR Norman SIZE Smooth TEXTURE NORM ASBJORNSON HALL 69 LIVONIA MICHIGAN ST. MARY’S CHAPEL PROJECT DETAILS Dark Ironspot COLOR Modular Shapes SIZE Smooth TEXTURE 70 Golden Buff ARCHITECTURAL SERIES Light Grey Blend Grey Blend Light Sandstone Dark Sandstone Rose Blend Red Blend Burgundy Blend Ruby Red Red Ironspot Desert Ironspot Light Desert Ironspot Dark Coppertone Copper Canyon Bordeaux Blend Graphite Executive Ironspot Sienna Ironspot Medium Ironspot #77 Medium Ironspot #46 Dark Ironspot Manganese Ironspot Ravenswood Ironspot PROJECT BRICK VENEER - VELOUR TRI-COLOR BLENDROMAN BRICK (2"X12") 71 RUSTIC SERIES Adobe Sands Heritage Copper Sands Heritage Sahara Sands Heritage* Grey Heritage with Black Grey Sands * Can be done in square edge/no texture. Orleans Sands Heritage Merlot Sands AntiqueBurgundy Sands Heritage* Autumn Sands Heritage Heritage #46 Heritage #46 no Yellow Brick Color: Burgundy Sands Residence – Omaha, NE 72 TEXTURES Smooth Velour Matt Velvetex Vertical Score Artisan PROJECT BRICK VENEER - VELOUR TRI-COLOR BLEND ROMAN BRICK (2"X12") 73 TEXTURES SIZES ENGINEER MODULAR 3-5/8" x 2-13/16" x 7-5/8" ENGINEER KINGSIZE 3" x 2-13/16" x 9-5/8" 3" UTILITY 3" x 3-5/8" x 11-5/8" UTILITY 3-5/8" x 3-5/8" x 11-5/8" 2-1/4" MERIDIAN 3-5/8" x 2-1/4" x 15-5/8" 6" THRU THE WALL 5-5/8" x 3-5/8" x 11-5/8" 8" THRU THE WALL 7-5/8" x 3-5/8" x 11-5/8" TRIPLE BRICK 3-5/8" x 7-5/8" x 7-5/8" Heritage Antique MODULAR 3-5/8" x 2-1/4" x 7-5/8" ROMAN 3-5/8" x 1-5/8" x 11-5/8" NORMAN 3-5/8" x 2-1/4" x 11-5/8" SLIM KINGSIZE 2-5/8" x 2-5/8" x 9-5/8" KINGSIZE 3" x 2-5/8" x 9-5/8" NORWEGIAN 3-5/8" x 2-13/16" x 11-5/8" CLOSURE 3-5/8" x 3-5/8" x 7-5/8" MERIDIAN 3-5/8" x 3-5/8" x 15-5/8" 74 BOSTON MASSACHUSETTS FOUR51 MARLBOROUGH PROJECT DETAILS Medium Ironspot #46 COLOR Shapes Utility Roman Modular SIZE Smooth TEXTURE 75 AUSTIN TEXAS PROJECT DETAILS Manganese Ironspot COLOR Modular SIZE Smooth TEXTURE ARRIVE HOTEL 76 LINCOLN NEBRASKA PROJECT DETAILS Sienna Ironspot COLOR Meridian SIZE Velour TEXTURE THE KNOLLS 77 HOUSTON TEXAS PROJECT DETAILS Manganese Ironspot COLOR Norman SIZE Smooth TEXTURE MOODY CENTER FOR THE ARTS RICE UNIVERSITY 78 Endicott Clay Products Company P.O. Box 17 Fairbury, Nebraska USA 68352 P 402.729.3315 F 402.729.5804 endicott.com END-FBB-0123 79 CONSTRUCTION SPECIALTIES SUNSCREEN 110 WEST MAIN ST | CONSTrUCTION SpECIAlTIES SUNSCrEEN | CUTSHEETS | SEpTEMbEr 8, 2023 | 2 80 SUN CONTROL SOLUTIONS Questions? Connect with a CS Representative. c-sgroup.com/representative-locator c-sgroup.com | 800.233.8493 ©2023 Construction Specialties, Inc.Construction Specialties® Advantages • Highly customizable design options • Blades can run horizontal or vertical • Nearly unlimited combination of blade and mounting solutions • Functions as architectural feature for the building • Blades available in single and two-piece extrusions • Fully engineered system is assembled for easy installation • Optional LED Lux lighting • Minimizes direct solar heat gain to reduce cooling costs and the heat island effect • Provides occupant visual and thermal comfort • Helps reduce glare Sun Controls are the best solution for reducing solar heat gain through exterior architectural solar shading. Linear sunshade systems can be mounted horizontally or vertically in front of the window to help shade the interior even when the sun is lowest on the horizon. The system also functions as a custom architectural element on the building. Linear Sunshades Applications • Any application where either solar (daylighting) control is required, custom architectural accents are desired or a functioning vision barrier is needed. Questions? Connect with a CS Representative. c-sgroup.com/representative-locator c-sgroup.com | 800.233.8493 ©2022 Construction Specialties, Inc. PS.LSS.0423 81 SUN CONTROL SOLUTIONS Questions? Connect with a CS Representative. c-sgroup.com/representative-locator c-sgroup.com | 800.233.8493 ©2023 Construction Specialties, Inc.Construction Specialties® XL One-Piece Airfoil Two-Piece Airfoil One-Piece Airfoil Rectangle Long-Span Airfoil Finish Options Wood Grain Patterns Custom Color Pearlescent & Metallic Kynar & Powder Coat See all finish options online at c-sgroup.com. Linear Sunshades PS.LSS.0423 Product Details • Mounted via flat plate outriggers or via bird mouth casting back to structure • Blades can be set at varying angles • All hardware and mounting components included Warranty • One-Year Material Warranty • 20-Year Finish Warranty (does not include anodized) • 15-year Finish Warranty Wood Grain Blade Profiles BLADE TYPE WIDTH DEPTH MAX LENGTH* One-Piece Airfoil 3" - 12" (76.2mm - 304.8mm) 1" - 2" (25.4mm - 50.8mm) 20' (6.10m) Two-Piece Airfoil 14" - 24" (355.6mm - 609.6mm) 2 3/8" - 4 1/2" (60.3mm - 114.3mm) 14' (4.27m) Long-Span Airfoil 6" - 12" (152.4mm - 304.8mm) 2" - 3" (50.8mm - 76.2mm) 20' (6.10m) Rectangle** 6" - 20" (152.4mm - 508mm) 2" - 2 1/2" (50.8mm - 63.5mm) 14' - 20' (4.27m - 6.10m) XL One-Piece Airfoil 18" - 24" (457.2mm - 609.6mm) 4" - 4 1/2" (101.6mm - 114.3mm) 20' (6.10m) * Max length will vary based on wind load, connection type, shop limitation, finishing, and shipping restrictions ** 20" Rectangle is a single-piece extrusion Learn More Questions? Connect with a CS Representative. c-sgroup.com/representative-locator c-sgroup.com | 800.233.8493 ©2022 Construction Specialties, Inc. SATIN WHITE FINISH HOTEL ENTRY SUNSCREEN - ALUMINUM LINEAR 8" AFB ONE-PIECE AIRFOIL 82 PURA NFC SIDING 110 WEST MAIN ST | pUr A NfC SIDINg | CUTSHEETS | SEpTEMbEr 8, 2023 | 3 83 LASTING AESTHETICS 84 Pura® NFC by Trespa clads buildings in enduring elegance – maintaining its beauty and smooth surface in the face of the elements. The premium façade solution is designed to be durable, low maintenance and easily installed. Go to PURA-NFC.COM to get inspired and see some of our customer stories. Lasting aesthetics The NFC in Pura® NFC stands for natural fiber core. The high-pressure laminate is made of up to 70% natural fibers, which go through an advanced in-house developed manufacturing process. All Pura® NFC products are certified according to PEFC™ standard. PURA® NFC PU02 Classic Oak 3 PURA® NFC BY TRESPA|2|85 Pura® NFC can stand out as an architectural element or harmonize with landscapes and other building materials. Its closed surface minimizes dirt build-up and makes the siding easy to clean. It keeps buildings looking good for decades. Stunning for decades PURA® NFC PU17 Aged Ash PU24 Mystic Cedar PU28 Siberian Larch 4 5 PURA® NFC BY TRESPA||86 High impact and scratch resistance All-season durability The façade protects what’s behind it. But what protects the façade? Pura® NFC uses next-generation Electron Beam Curing (EBC) technology to create a closed and smooth surface. The system is built for rough weather and has high impact and scratch resistance. The built-in color stability means Pura® NFC will look good for years without any replacement. PURA® NFC PU02 Classic Oak 6 7PURA® NFC BY TRESPA||87 PURA® NFC PU17 Aged Ash PU22 Slate Ebony TRESPA® METEON® NW22 Slate Wood The closed surface created by Trespa’s proprietary Electron Beam Curing (EBC) technology makes it hard for dirt to build up, locking it out and colors in. Hassle-free maintenance Pura® NFC by Trespa isn’t just beautiful; its durability means you do not have to worry about it. The closed surface prevents dirt from building up, making cleaning easy and infrequent. Contaminants like soot, salt, graffiti and permanent markers are easy to remove. Buildings keep their vibrant beauty year after year. It’s yet another way that buildings with Pura® NFC façades give owners less to worry about and more time to enjoy their home with friends and family. Pura® NFC is an investment in lasting curb appeal. No painting or refinishing needed 8 9PURA® NFC BY TRESPA||88 Whether it’s salty sea air, wind, rain, humidity or intense sunlight, Pura® NFC stands up to the weather. Each Pura® NFC sample undergoes many laboratory tests where it’s exposed to damaging climate elements, then checked to confirm that it has maintained its vibrancy and polish. Imagine the beauty of a seaside home that remains richly hued without the need for constant repair. The Pura® NFC system is manufactured for long-lasting performance and beauty – an investment in the future. PURA® NFC PU08 Romantic Walnut PU24 Mystic Cedar Siding is intended to be outdoors, after all 10 11 PURA® NFC BY TRESPA||89 PURA® NFC PU02 Classic Oak P12.6.3 Wine Red (discontinued) Recently, our backyards have become our sanctuaries, our party rooms and our playrooms. Vacation homes, on the other hand, have always been an escape to calm, whether surrounded solely by nature or a park with amenities and activities. Whatever use the buildings are put to, a façade built with Pura® NFC will enhance the beauty of a property. Pura® NFC is an enduringly beautiful siding with engineered durability and a range of luxurious decors, from textured Siberian Larch to the dark velvety texture of Pura® NFC Lumen. The beauty of Pura® NFC siding is that you can install it and be done. It stays pristine for decades, so maintenance is hassle-free. Make your vacation home or garden house a source of joy - not chores - for everyone! FOLLOW MY ADVENTURES! #FOLLOWTHEHUB PURA® NFC BY TRESPA12||1390 A rich paletteof colors PURA® NFC PU02 Classic Oak LUMEN PUL0500 Athens White PUL2581 New York Grey PUL9000 Metropolis Black Pura® NFC Lumen gently diffuses light for a modern or ethereal look. Its low reflection of light gives the façade a smooth matte appearance. WOOD DECORS PU02 Classic Oak PU14 French Walnut PU31 Western Red Cedar PU08 Romantic Walnut PU30 Tropical Ipe PU28 Siberian Larch PU24 Mystic Cedar PU17 Aged Ash PU22 Slate Ebony NEW NEW NEW Harmonizing with nature 14 15 PURA® NFC BY TRESPA||91 A complete solution Pura® NFC comes with a tailored collection of installation clips, color-matched profiles and fasteners - everything needed to create an evenly hued façade. Every detail can look exactly as it was designed. The siding comes prefinished, but if they need to be fitted for a dormer or eaves, the strength of Pura® NFC means installers can saw without splinters or shattering. Also, the edges don’t need sealing – the durability and hue go all the way through. Corners stay sharp and flats stay smooth. PURA® NFC PU31 Western Red Cedar PURA® NFC Lumen PUL0500 Athens White PURA® NFC PU14 French Walnut PURA® NFC Lumen PUL2581 New York Grey PURA® NFC Lumen PUL9000 Metropolis Black 16 17 PURA® NFC BY TRESPA||PURA® NFC BY TRESPA92 Easily installed, and be done PURA® NFC PU08 Romantic Walnut 19 PURA® NFC BY TRESPA|18|93 No-fuss installation Scan the QR code for a video on installation. For specifics about fixing solutions, please visit our website TRESPA.INFO. PURA® NFC PU08 Romantic Walnut 1. Pura ® NFC siding 2. Pura® NFC clip 3. Color-matched profile 4. EPDM 5. Subframe 6. Color-matched fasteners 7. Load-bearing wall 8. Ventilation airflow Pura® NFC is engineered to be used in a ventilated façade solution that’s easily installed. The relatively low weight of the prefinished siding makes it easy to slide into place and its durability means it can handle a rough build site. The combination of durability and ventilation helps Pura® NFC withstand challenging climates. 1457 632 The system includes an air cavity in front of the load- bearing wall, allowing an airflow that prevents heat or moisture accumulation.This sketch is intended as a general overview only. 1 3 8 21 PURA® NFC BY TRESPA|20|94 Delivery program SPECIAL REQUEST Looking for different colors? Pura® NFC is available in a wide range of Trespa ® colors and decors. For more information, please contact your local Trespa representative. Order samples at PURA-NFC.COM. TRESPA® INTERNATIONAL SINCE 1960 TRESPA - THE ARCHITECTS’ CHOICE FOR OVER 60 YEARS Pura® NFC is designed and created by Trespa, a specialist in paneling and siding headquartered in the Netherlands. Founded in 1960, Trespa is the first choice in exterior paneling for many of the world’s leading architects, who insist on quality, reliability and durability for their projects. For specifics about fixing solutions, please visit our website TRESPA.INFO. LUMEN COLOR CODE COLOR NAME CORE FINISH Brown Black Diffuse PUL0500 Athens White •• PUL2581 New York Grey •• PUL9000 Metropolis Black •• PREFINISHED SIDING Classic Oak (PU02) French Walnut (PU14) Western Red Cedar (PU31) Romantic Walnut (PU08) Tropical Ipe (PU30) Siberian Larch (PU28) Aged Ash (PU17)/ Mystic Cedar (PU24) Brown core Black core/Black (PU90) Slate Ebony (PU22) New York Grey (PUL2581) Metropolis Black (PUL9000) Athens White (PUL0500) Aluminium (PU00) PROFILES, HPL SCREWS AND RIVETS ARE AVAILABLE IN THE FOLLOWING COLORS: Proface® outer-corner profile Proface® finish profile Proface® support profile* Ipex universal ventilation profile** Ipex universal starter rail and matching SFS screw** Universal clip and matching SFS screw SFS profile screws SFS HPL fast fixing screws SFS rivet SFS Self-Flex EPDM joint tape 25 m x 0.8 x 70 mm 25 m x 0.8 x 130 mm 82.02 ft x 5.12 x 0.032 in 82.02 ft x 2.75 x 0.032 in FASTENERS AND MATCHING ACCESSORIES *only available in black core, brown core | **only available in black WOOD DECORS COLOR CODE COLOR NAME CORE FINISH Brown Black Matte PU02 Classic Oak •• PU14 French Walnut •• PU31 Western Red Cedar •• PU08 Romantic Walnut •• PU30 Tropical Ipe •• PU28 Siberian Larch •• PU24 Mystic Cedar •• PU17 Aged Ash •• PU22 Slate Ebony •• NEW NEW NEW SIDING Size 120.08 x 7.32 x 0.315 in 3050 x 186 x 8 mm Surface (gross)6.106 ft2 0.57 m2 Surface (net)5.893 ft2 0.55 m2 PACK Quantity 4 pcs Weight indication 58 lbs 26 kg FULL PALLET Quantity 144 pcs / 36 packs 22 23 PURA® NFC BY TRESPA|| HOTEL 6" VERTICAL RAINSCREEN TOWNHOUSE 6" VERTICAL RAINSCREEN 95 TRESPA INTERNATIONAL B.V. P.O. Box 110, 6000 AC Weert Wetering 20, 6002 SM Weert The Netherlands www.trespa.com UNITED KINGDOM & IRELAND TRESPA UK LTD. Coast Road North Shields Tyne & Wear, NE29 8RE United Kingdom Tel: 0808-2340268 Info.UK@Trespa.com EMEA & APAC EXPORT CUSTOMER SERVICE DESK Tel: +31 (0) 495 458 839 Info.Export@Trespa.com DISCLAIMER The disclaimer that follows is a summary of the applicable full disclaimer (which can be found on www.trespa.com). The information provided by Trespa International B.V. (“Trespa”) in this document is solely indicative. Trespa is unable to warrant the accuracy and completeness of this information. No rights can be derived from the information provided; the use of the information is at the other party’s risk and responsibility. This document does not guarantee any properties of Trespa’s products. Trespa does not warrant that the information in this document is suitable for the purpose for which it is consulted by the other party. The document does not contain any design, structural calculation, estimate or other warranty or representation that customers and third parties may rely on. Colours used in Trespa’s communications (including but not limited to printed matter) and in samples of Trespa’s products may differ from the colours of the Trespa’s products to be supplied. Trespa’s products and samples are produced within the specified colour tolerances and the colours (of production batches) may differ, even if the same colour is used. The viewing angle also influences the colour perception. Customers and third parties must have a professional adviser inform them about (the suitability of) the Trespa’s products for all desired applications and about applicable laws and regulations. Trespa reserves the right to change (the specifications for) its products without prior notice. To the maximum extent permitted under the applicable law, Trespa is not liable (neither contractual nor non-contractual) for any damage arising from or related to the use of this document, except if and to the extent that such damage is the result of wilful misconduct or gross negligence on the part of Trespa and/or its management. All oral and written statements, offers, quotations, sales, supplies, deliveries and/or agreements and all related activities of Trespa are governed by the Trespa General Terms and Conditions of Sale (Algemene verkoopvoorwaarden Trespa International B.V.). All oral and written statements, offers, quotations, sales, supplies, deliveries and/or agreements and all related work of Trespa North America, Ltd. are governed by the Trespa General Terms and Conditions of Sale, which can be found on and downloaded from the Trespa website, www.trespa.com/documentation. All intellectual property rights and other rights regarding the content of this document (including logos, text and photographs) are owned by Trespa and/or its licensors. TRESPA INTERNATIONAL B.V. P.O. Box 110, 6000 AC Weert Wetering 20, 6002 SM Weert The Netherlands www.trespa.com TRESPA NORTH AMERICA LTD. 350 Fifth Avenue, Ste 4610 New York NY 10118 United States 1-800-487-3772 Info.NorthAmerica@Trespa.com Disclaimer: The disclaimer that follows is a summary of the applicable full disclaimer (which can be found on www.trespa.com). The information provided by Trespa International B.V. (“Trespa”) in this document is solely indicative. Trespa is unable to warrant the accuracy and completeness of this information. No rights can be derived from the information provided; the use of the information is at the other party’s risk and responsibility. This document does not guarantee any properties of Trespa’s products. Trespa does not warrant that the information in this document is suitable for the purpose for which it is consulted by the other party. The document does not contain any design, structural calculation, estimate or other warranty or representation that customers and third parties may rely on. Colors used in Trespa’s communications (including but not limited to printed matter) and in samples of Trespa’s products may differ from the colors of the Trespa’s products to be supplied. Trespa’s products and samples are produced within the specified color tolerances and the colors (of production batches) may differ, even if the same color is used. The viewing angle also influences the color perception. Customers and third parties must have a professional adviser inform them about (the suitability of) the Trespa’s products for all desired applications and about applicable laws and regulations. Trespa reserves the right to change (the specifications for) its products without prior notice. To the maximum extent permitted under the applicable law, Trespa is not liable (neither contractual nor non-contractual) for any damage arising from or related to the use of this document, except if and to the extent that such damage is the result of wilful misconduct or gross negligence on the part of Trespa and/or its management. All oral and written statements, offers, quotations, sales, supplies, deliveries and/or agreements and all related activities of Trespa are governed by the Trespa General Terms and Conditions of Sale (Algemene verkoopvoorwaarden Trespa International B.V.). All oral and written statements, offers, quotations, sales, supplies, deliveries and/or agreements and all related work of Trespa North America, Ltd. are governed by the Trespa North America General Terms and Conditions of Sale, which can be found on and downloaded from the Trespa website, www.trespa.com/documentation. All intellectual property rights and other rights regarding the content of this document (including logos, text and photographs) are owned by Trespa and/or its licensors. Please visit TRESPA.COM or TRESPA.INFO for the most up to date information. EN-US7100- 432292 | Version 3.0 Brochure code EN-US7100 | Date 12-2021 PURA® NFC PU28 Siberian Larch 96 ARBOR WOOD CO. CLADDING 110 WEST MAIN ST | ArbOr WOOD CO. | CUTSHEETS | SEpTEMbEr 8, 2023 | 4 97 98 99 Responsibly produced thermally modified wood. WHERE INNOVATION MEETS BEAUTY. Arbor Wood Co. produces thermally modified wood for a variety of outdoor and indoor applications including siding, decking, and dimensional lumber. Our process begins with a select grade of domestically grown and responsibly harvested timber which undergoes a thermal modification process using heat and steam. The result is a high quality, performance driven material which sustains the natural beauty and design element of wood all without the use of harsh chemicals. Thermal modification is a unique craft which alters wood at the cellular level to create a material that is functionally and visually successful in a range of residential and commercial applications. High heat and steam replace chemicals to fundamentally modify Arbor Wood’s hemicellulose, making it one of the most natural, chemical-free ways to extend the service life of a wood product. The wood is less absorbent, resulting in increased material stability with less warping/cupping and minimal expansion/contraction. Additionally, certain organic compounds are eliminated during modification thus removing the food source for rot and insects. The conversion of sugars to a nonfood source also turns the timber a darker, richer through-color, providing an appealing and refined aesthetic. arborwoodco.com 100 Prior to modification, our rough-sawn timber is hand selected, graded for quality, and kiln dried to a consistent moisture content. The wood then enters our modification process where high heat and steam improve the dimensional stability, durability, and visual tone of the material. Once modified, these timbers are milled into finished profiles where any undesired characteristics such as checking or end-cracking are also removed. The result is a beautiful board which is straight, true and ready for use. Our process begins with a select grade of domestically grown and responsibly harvested wood. PHASE 1: TEMPERATURE INCREASE Kiln temperature is raised rapidly to reduce moisture content down to nearly zero and eliminate bound water from the hemicellulose in the wood. With this, the food sources for mold, rot, fungal decay and insects are also removed. PHASE 2: THERMAL MODIFICATION The second phase is where peak temperature is hit and thermal modification occurs. The hydroxyl groups within the hemicellulose are broken, thus rendering the wood resistant to water absorption. Naturally occurring sugars are converted and give the wood a slightly darker, richer appearance. PHASE 3: COOLING & RE-CONDITIONING Temperature is reduced and steam introduced to complete the process. The steam cools and conditions the wood to a final moisture content of 4-6% improving dimensional stability. PHASE 3PHASE 2PHASE 1 arborwoodco.com 101 Lasting Beauty and Lasting Impact The thermal modification process affects wood’s relationship with water by breaking down the hydroxyl groups in the wood and eliminating the bound water, making Arbor Wood less prone to mold, rot, and fungal decay. The wood is also less likely to absorb new moisture and has a reduced equilibrium moisture content, reducing the chance of swelling and shrinking by up to 60%. The lower moisture content reduces the overall weight of the wood and helps support the general workability of Arbor Wood. SOLID & STABLE Dimensional stability is increased as expansion and contraction is reduced by up to 60%. CHEMICAL FREE The thermal modification process uses nothing but heat and steam. ULTIMATE WORKABILITY Arbor Wood may be glued, painted, or finished similar to standard wood to achieve the desired look for your next project. ENHANCED APPEARANCE Thermally modified wood will have richer tones that extend throughout the entire thickness of each board. DECAY RESISTANT Less water absorption makes it less susceptible to mold, rot & fungal decay. LIGHTER WEIGHT A significantly lower moisture content reduces the physical weight of each board for easier handling and installation. arborwoodco.com 102 Sustainability Arbor Wood is a premier choice for sustainably harvested thermally modified wood. Our material can be used in place of more expensive tropical wood species and is a domestic, renewable, and environmentally conscious option. Learn more about our Sustainability Efforts RENEWABLE Manufactured domestically from trees sourced and harvested in responsibly managed forests in the United States. LONGER LASTING Microscopic changes to the wood have macro results - longer lasting, hydrophobic, resistant to rot and decay - just to name a few. CHEMICAL FREE High heat and steam replace more traditional chemicals, which are otherwise so prevalent in building materials. CARBON STORAGE Using wood can reduce carbon emissions due to its properties as a natural carbon sink. Associated Sustainability Organizations arborwoodco.com 103 SIDING Arbor Wood siding is produced from domestically sourced and responsibly harvested wood. We produce a range of wood species, profile and finish options, including our take on traditional Japanese charred cladding. DECKING Arbor Wood decking is available in a range of species and profile options. Our modified hardwoods prove an eco-conscious alternative to exotic hardwoods, and our softwoods a more natural and durable alternative to chemically- preserved lumber. DIMENSIONAL LUMBER From windows and doors to interior flooring and even landscape furnishings, Arbor Wood is available in a range of profiles to allow for a higher performance natural wood alternative. Products & Applications Thermally modified wood can be used in an array of commercial and residential applications. Popular applications are in external environments where moisture and humidity would compromise a lesser-grade material. Arbor Wood is a sound choice in environments typically unforgiving to wood, such as exterior decking and siding or interior flooring, or where a low-maintenance natural wood product is desired. arborwoodco.com 104 + burned & brushed pine + black oil + burned & brushed pine + brown oil + burned pine + black oil Collections expressive, earthly, exquisite burned, bold, beautiful + brushed pine + white oil + brushed pine + grey oil minimal, raw, refined + ash + no finish + pine + clear oil Arbor Wood is available in a variety of bold and distinct factory finishes to fit your project. + red oak + no finish arborwoodco.com TOWNHOUSE VERTICAL SIDING - BRNSH - BURNED & BRUSHED PINE BLACK OIL FINISH TONGUE & GROOVE 1" X 4"1" EXPOSURE TOWNHOUSE HORIZONTAL SIDING - ELMNT - BRUSHED ASH WITH CUSTOM SIOO:XOYSTER GREY FINISHTONGUE & GROOVE 1" X 4" HOTEL HORIZONTAL SIDING - ELMNT - BRUSHED ASH WITH CUSTOM SIOO:XOYSTER GREY FINISHTONGUE & GROOVE .35" X 8" 105 Accessories Maintenance COLOR CHANGE Thermal modification changes the naturally occurring sugars in the wood resulting in beautiful, rich tones that extend through the full thickness of the material. Since Arbor Wood is still a natural product, the grain and unique characteristics of the wood remain. In an exterior environment, Arbor Wood will move to gray when unfinished and the application of UV inhibitors help slow this process similar to non-modified products. FINISHES It is recommended to finish natural Arbor Wood products with an exterior UV protective surface finish. We recommend a regular maintenance schedule of CUTEK® Extreme along with a Colortone UV inhibitor to help maintain the original tone of the wood. Arbor Wood Co. is proud to offer a wide range of accessories compatible with our siding, decking, and dimensional lumber products. From hidden fasteners, screws, furring strips, and end sealer, we are able to provide everything you need to complete your project right. Scan for more information and to see our full lineup of accessories and finishes. arborwoodco.com 106 Proles & Dimensions SIDING DECKING Species Species Ash Pine Red Oak Ash Ash Ash Red Oak Ash Red Oak Ash Ash Ash Ash Pine Pine Prole Prole Tongue & Groove Hidden Fastener Non-Grooved Hidden Fastener Non-Grooved Hidden Fastener Non-Grooved Tongue & Groove Hidden Fastener Hidden Fastener Non-Grooved Dimension Dimension .75” x 5” 1” x 5.5” 1” x 5.5” 1” x 3.5” 1” x 3.5” 1” x 5.25” 1” x 5.25” .75” x 3” .75” x 4.5” .75” x 5.5” .75” x 5.5” Scan for additional resources including mechanical specications, installation guides and warranty information. END MATCH DETAIL DECKING SIDING 107 Ash Pine Red Oak Ash Pine Red Oak Ash Pine Red Oak Ash Pine Red Oak Ash Pine Red Oak Ash Pine Red Oak Ash Pine Red Oak Ash Pine Red Oak Ash Pine Red Oak DIMENSIONAL LUMBER Pine 3.5” x 3.5” Dimension (actual)Species Ash Pine Red Oak 1” x 4” 1” x 6” 1” x 8” 2” x 2” 2” x 4” 2” x 6” 2” x 8” 2” x 10” 2” x 12” 4” x 4” Dimension (nominal) 1” x 2”.75” x 1.5” .75” x 3.5” .75” x 5.5” .75” x 7.25” 1.5” x 1.5” 1.5” x 3.5” 1.5” x 5.5” 1.5” x 7.25” 1.5” x 9.25” 1.5” x 11.25” arborwoodco.com 108 Arbor Wood Co. 1025 London Road Duluth, MN 55802 855-414-2727 Arbor Wood. For Good. arborwoodco.com 109 CUSTOM FABRICATED ARCHITECTURAL METAL SCREEN 110 WEST MAIN ST | CUSTOM fAbrICATED ArCHITECTUr Al METAl SCrEEN | CUTSHEETS | SEpTEMbEr 8, 2023 | 5 110 HSS 2 X 2 HSS 2 X 2HSS 1 1/2 X 3/4 2" 2" 2" 3/4" 1 1/2" TYP. CENTER TO CENTER 4 1/2" 111 METAL SALES 110 WEST MAIN ST | METAl SAlES | CUTSHEETS | SEpTEMbEr 8, 2023 | 6 112 CC ondensedTTechnicalRReference OPEN FRAMING OR SOLID SUBSTRATE ARCHITECTURAL COMMERCIAL INDUSTRIAL PANEL 12" COVERAGE SOFFIT, FASCIA, WALL AND LINER PANEL CONCEALED FASTENED Finish: Standard: PVDF Optional: multi-pass Kynar 500®, Marblique, Plastisol, Polyester and MS Colorfast45® Corrosion Protection: AZ50 per ASTM A 792 for painted Galvalume® G90 per ASTM A 653 for Galvanized Gauges: 24 ga, 22 ga, 20 ga and 18 ga 12" panel coverage, 11/2" panel height Flush face, concealed fastened, non-end lapping panel system Panel Length: 5' minimum, 30' maximum Optional material availability: Stainless Steel, Copper and Aluminum Use on single-skin or field-assembled wall systems Custom capabilities include: -Perforated panels for wind screens and liner panels PANEL OVERVIEW TL-17 PANEL UL 263 Fire Resistance Rating - per assembly ASTM E 283 Air Leakage ASTM E 331 Water Penetration ASTM E 330 Uniform Static Air Pressure Difference ASTM E 1592 Uniform Static Air Pressure Difference TESTING AND APPROVALS WALL PANEL 11/2" C 12" Coverage 113 CC ondensedTTechnicalRReference ©MSMC/3-2020Anchorage, AK 866.640.7663 Bay City, MI 888.777.7640 Deer Lake, PA 800.544.2577 Denver, CO 800.289.7663 Detroit Lakes, MN 888.594.1394 Fontana, CA 800.782.7953 Fort Smith, AR 877.452.3915 Independence, MO 800.747.0012 Jacksonville, FL 800.394.4419 Jefferson, OH 800.321.5833 Mocksville, NC 800.228.6119 Nashville, TN 800.251.8508 Rock Island, IL 800.747.1206 Rogers, MN 800.328.9316 Seattle, WA 800.431.3470 Sellersburg, IN 800.999.7777 Sioux Falls, SD 888.299.0024 Spokane, WA 800.572.6565 Temple, TX 800.543.4415 Woodland, CA 800.759.6019 metalsales.us.com Overdriven fasteners will cause panel distortions. Fasteners should extend 1/2" or more past the inside face of the support material. Thick Panels (ex. 18 ga) or supports (ex. 1/2" steel) may require predrilling of holes for screws. Panel Fasteners: Attaching to Wood: #10-12 Pancake Head Wood Screw Attaching to Steel: <18 ga: 1/4"-13 Deck Screw >=18 ga, <=12 ga: #10-16 Pancake Head Driller Trim Fasteners: 1/4"-14 x 7/8" XL Stitch Screw 1/8" x 3/16" Pop Rivet Field-Applied Adhesive: 3/8" bead of SM7108 FASTENING INFORMATIONATTACHMENT DETAILS TL-17 PANEL 1. Theoretical section properties have been calculated per AISI 2012 'North American Specification for the Design of Cold-Formed Steel Structural Members'. Ixx and Sxx are effective section properties for deflection and bending. 2. Allowable loads are calculated in accordance with AISI 2012 specifications considering bending, shear, combined bending, shear and deflection and panel testing per ASTM E 1592 over 16 ga support and field-applied adhesive as shown above. Allowable loads consider the 3 or more equal spans condition. Allowable loads do not address web crippling, fasteners or support material. Panel weight is not considered. 3. Deflection consideration is limited by a maximum deflection ratio of L/180 of span. 4. Allowable loads do not include a 1/3 stress increase for wind. SECTION PROPERTIES ALLOWABLE UNIFORM LOADS, psf For various fastener spacings Ga Width in Yield ksi Weight psf Top In Compression Bottom In Compression Inward Load Outward LoadIxx in4/ft Sxx in3/ft Ixx in4/ft Sxx in3/ft 2'3'4'5'6'8'2'3'4'5'6'8' 24 12 50 1.34 0.0495 0.0562 0.0746 0.0597 50 45 39 34 28 18 81 71 62 51 36 20 22 12 50 1.76 0.0714 0.0847 0.1014 0.0811 63 56 50 44 38 25 83 74 65 56 48 30 20 12 33 2.15 0.1017 0.1314 0.1328 0.1071 63 56 50 44 38 25 83 74 65 56 48 30 18 12 33 2.82 0.1530 0.1851 0.1840 0.1486 63 56 50 44 38 25 83 74 65 56 48 30 Panel Fastener Left to Right Installation DIRECTIONAL DETAILS Right to Left Installation Field-Applied Adhesive Field-Applied Adhesive 114 All colors carry a 45 year limited paint warranty. Color selections are close representations but are limited by printing and viewing conditions. Actual samples are available by request. Premium 242424 PremiumPremiumRoof andRoof and WallWall ColorsColors Terra Cotta (W72) Snowdrift White (W81)Linen White (81) Khaki (88) Old Town Grey (W25) Mansard Brown (133) Ocean Blue (35) Ash Grey (25) Colonial Red (W75) Regal Blue (W35) Taupe (74) Hemlock Green (M7)Classic Green (66) Weathered Copper (W50) Aged Copper (65) Sandstone (W51) Felt Green (W66) Slate Grey (W38) Tahoe Blue (W71) Brandywine (P8) Copper Penny (W92)1 Patriot Red (73) Parchment (W74) Metallic Silver (K7)1 Patina Green (W58) Dark Bronze (50) Matte Black (106) Mistique Plus (W31)1 Medium Bronze (H4) Antique Patina (M1)1 River Teal (59) Champagne Metallic (168)1 Old Zinc Grey (W29) 1 Metallic Colors, up-charge will apply PVDF Paint System Galvalume® (41) Non-painted Finish 25 Year Warranty All colors carry a 45 year limited paint warranty. Color selections are close representations but are limited by printing and viewing conditions. Actual samples are available by request. Visit metalsales.us.com for valuable tools and resources. Premium 24242445aint finish yearwarrantypaint finish RATEDPRODUCT HOTEL METAL PANEL FINISH 115 Metal Sales Branch Locations metalsales.us.com Anchorage, AK: 866.640.7663 Bay City, MI: 888.777.7640 Deer Lake, PA: 800.544.2577 Denver, CO: 800.289.7663 Detroit Lakes, MN: 888.594.1394 Fontana, CA: 800.782.7953 Fort Smith, AR: 877.452.3915 Independence, MO: 800.747.0012 Jacksonville, FL: 800.394.4419 Jefferson, OH: 800.321.5833 Mocksville, NC: 800.228.6119 Nashville, TN: 800.251.8508 Rock Island, IL: 800.747.1206 Rogers, MN: 800.328.9316 Seattle, WA: 800.431.3470 Sellersburg, IN: 800.999.7777 Sioux Falls, SD: 888.299.0024 Spokane, WA: 800.572.6565 Temple, TX: 800.543.4415 Woodland, CA: 800.759.6019 *LOW SLOPE: Surface with a slope of 2:12 or less ● STEEP SLOPE: Surface with a slope greater than 2:12 3-2022 1318 PVDF Color NamePVDF Color Name (Color Code)(Color Code)Solar Solar ReflectanceReflectanceASTM C 1549ASTM C 1549ThermalThermalEmittanceEmittanceASTM C 1371ASTM C 1371Solar ReflectanceSolar ReflectanceIndexIndexASTM E 1980ASTM E 1980Low GlossLow GlossMetallic FinishMetallic FinishENERGY STARENERGY STAR®®Steep Slope*Steep Slope*ENERGY STARENERGY STAR®®Low Slope*Low Slope*CRRCCRRCSteep Slope*Steep Slope*CRRCCRRCLow Slope*Low Slope*LEEDLEEDSteep Slope*Steep Slope*LEED LEED Low Slope*Low Slope*Aged Copper (65)0.32 0.85 32 ●●● Antique Patina (M1)0.38 0.85 40 ●●●● Ash Grey (25)0.38 0.86 41 ●●● Brandywine (P8)0.26 0.85 24 ●● Champagne Metallic (168)0.47 0.85 53 ●●●● Classic Green (66)0.32 0.86 33 ●●● Colonial Red (W75)0.35 0.86 37 ●●●● Copper Penny (W92)0.45 0.85 50 ●●●● Dark Bronze (50)0.30 0.86 30 ●●● Felt Green (W66)0.31 0.84 31 ●●●● Galvalume® (41)0.67 0.14 56 ●●● Hemlock Green (M7)0.36 0.85 38 ●●●● Khaki (88)0.35 0.87 37 ●●● Linen White (81)0.73 0.86 89 ●●●●●● Mansard Brown (133)0.30 0.87 31 ●●● Matte Black (106)0.27 0.86 26 ●● Medium Bronze (H4)0.30 0.87 31 ●●● Metallic Silver (K7)0.60 0.77 68 ●●●● Mistique Plus (W31)0.34 0.82 34 ●●●● Ocean Blue (35)0.29 0.86 29 ●●● Old Town Grey (W25)0.40 0.85 43 ●●●● Old Zinc Grey (W29)0.42 0.85 46 ●●●● Parchment (W74)0.41 0.86 45 ●●●● Patina Green (W58)0.46 0.85 51 ●●●● Patriot Red (73)0.46 0.86 52 ●●● Regal Blue (W35)0.27 0.86 26 ●●● River Teal (59)0.29 0.86 29 ●●● Sandstone (W51)0.54 0.86 63 ●●● Slate Grey (W38)0.30 0.85 30 ●●●● Snowdrift White (W81)0.65 0.85 78 ●●●●●● Tahoe Blue (W71)0.30 0.86 30 ●●●● Taupe (74)0.29 0.84 28 ●● Terra Cotta (W72)0.39 0.85 42 ●●●● Weathered Copper (W50)0.32 0.84 32 ●●●● 116 METAL ARCHITECTURAL SYSTEMS 117 We Speak Architect Review our most popular profiles in this catalog. For additional options visit metalsales.us.com. Those outside the industry would suggest “architect” is not a language. We know better. And at Metal Sales, we are fluent in all of its dialects. v Design Innovation: Our roof and wall systems reflect carefully considered design. No matter the design vernacular -- modernist, industrial or classic -- metal roof and wall panels deliver the versatility to make any style come to life. v Sustainability: We strive to lead the way in advancing sustainable design and construction, including architectural strategies that drive energy efficiency, LEED certification and Net- Zero construction. We are the first metal panel manufacturer to offer Fluropon® Pure coatings and to be included in the exclusive Declare™ program. v Strength and Durability: Specify metal roof and wall panel for a service life of 30 to 50 years. Our design and engineering services allow for the warranty of even the most challenging building geometries. For commercial applications, a metal roof will likely be the last roof installed on a structure, lasting two to three times longer than other roof materials and far more resistant to leaks than flat roofs. v Aesthetics: The use of metal panels can impart a rustic or modernist appeal to any project. Metal Sales offers a wide range of profiles in a wide variety of colors and finishes for roof and wall applications. This diverse offering satisfies almost all architectural requirements and tastes. Let us show you how we can translate your inspirations into building designs that leave people – speechless. 118 TABLE OF CONTENTS 11 TLC Series 12 Apex Series ™ 12 Contempra Series ™ 13 Empire Series ™ 14 TL Series 15 Soffit Panel 17 T10 Series 18 T16-E, T16-L 18 T2, T3, T4 19 T5, T6-A 19 T2630, T2832 20 T13, T13-A, T23, T25 20 TDR-6 21 IC72-Panel 21 7/8” Corrugated, 2-1/2” Corrugated For over 55 years architects, contractors and building owners have trusted Metal Sales for unique and beautiful metal roof and wall systems that stand the test of time, even in the most rigorous environments. metalsales.us.com | 3 INSULATED WALL AND ROOF PANELS EXPOSED FASTENER WALL AND ROOF SYSTEMS DESIGN CAPABILITIES 23 IMPower Series™ Insulated Metal Panels STANDING SEAM ROOF SYSTEMS 24 Retro-Master® System 24 Perforation | Mitered Corners | Curved Panel Options 25 Coating Systems 26 Technical Support 27 Finishes and Capabilities Chart 5 Magna-Loc 5 Magna-Loc 180 5 Curved Magna-Loc 180 6 T-Armor Series ™ 7 Seam-Loc 24® 7 Snap-Loc 24® 8 Vertical Seam 8 Mini-Batten 8 Curved Mini-Batten CONCEALED FASTENER WALL SYSTEMS 119 Standing Seam Roof Systems Metal Sales standing seam systems are some of the most popular and versatile options for installation over open framing or solid substrate. Our wide selection of profile and panel options are dependable, long-lasting and beautiful while still meeting project performance requirements. Cardiology Woodland Medical Building | Elizabethtown, KY Magna-Loc Roof Panels } Dark Bronze • Finishes: PVDF and Acrylic Coated Galvalume • Optional Finishes: Metallic, Nova, Prints, Rustica and Kameleon • Optional materials: stainless steel, aluminum, weathering steel and copper • Installs over open framing or solid substrate • Contact Metal Sales Technical Services Department and in-house Engineers for the latest Testing and Approval information 120 metalsales.us.com | 5 16" or 18" Coverage 2" 2" 2" Factory-Applied Sealant (typ.) Flat Pan with Pencil Ribs with Striations 16" or 18" Coverage 16" or 18" Coverage Factory-Applied Sealant Factory-Applied Sealant 16" or 18" Coverage 2" 2" 2"Flat Pan with Pencil Ribs with Striations 16" or 18" Coverage 16" or 18" Coverage Factory-Applied Sealant (typ.) CURVED MAGNA-LOC 180 Field-Applied Sealant 16" Coverage 2"with Striations • Structural standing seam curved roof system • Panel coverage: 16” • Rib height: 2” • Gauges: 24 ga. standard • Minimum radius: 20'-0" • Mechanically-seamed side lap resists wind uplift and remains weather-tight • Portable curving machine for on-site curving when required Magna-Loc Magna-Loc 180 • Structural standing seam roof system • Panel coverages: 16” or 18” • Rib height: 2” • Gauges: 24 ga. standard; 22 ga. optional • Mechanically-seamed side lap resists wind uplift and remains weather-tight • Ideal for both low slope and steep slope applications • Magna-Loc 180 option gives the seam increased strength for the most demanding roof applications MAGNA-LOC / MAGNA-LOC 180 121 T-ARMOR SERIES™ 12”, 16” and 18” 2-3/8” and 3” 12”, 16” and 18” 2-3/8” and 3” 12”, 16” and 18” 2-3/8” and 3” 12”, 16” and 18” 2-3/8” and 3” 12”, 16” and 18” 2-3/8” and 3” 12”, 16” and 18”12”, 16” and 18” 2-3/8” and 3” • Structural standing seam roof system • Panel coverage: 12”, 16” and 18” • Rib height: 2-3/8” and 3” • Gauges: 24 ga. standard; 22 ga., 20 ga. optional • Minimum roof slope: 1/2:12 • Mechanically-seamed "T" rib gives you the flexibility to remove individual panels without disturbing other installed panels • The symmetrical rib allows it to be installed left to right, right to left or both Flat Pan Striated 2-3/8" Pencil Rib Minor Rib Plank Mesa Kenwood Middle School | Louisville, KY T-Armor Pencil Rib Roof Panels } Classic Green 2-3/8" and 3" 122 metalsales.us.com | 7 SEAM-LOC 24® 24" Coverage 2-11/16" 18" Coverage 2-11/16" Factory-Applied Sealant (typ.) • Structural standing seam roof system • Panel coverage: 24” or 18” • Rib height: 2-11/16” • Gauges: 24 ga. standard; 22 ga. optional • Minimum roof slope: 1/4:12 • Concealed clip designed for thermal movement • The tall rib design and unique trapezoidal shape channel water off your roof even in very low slope applications • 24" wide coverage means less clips than a 16" wide panel resulting in faster installation 24" Coverage 3" Factory Applied Sealant SNAP-LOC 24® • Structural standing seam roof system • Panel coverage: 24” • Rib height: 3” • Gauges: 24 ga. standard; 22 ga. optional • Minimum roof slope: 1/4:12 • Concealed clip designed for thermal movement • Snap-seam rib design for easy installation • Snap-Loc 24 is best suited for long, straight panel runs on industrial, commercial and storage buildings 123 VERTICAL SEAM • Structural standing seam roof system • Panel coverages: 12”, 16” or 18” • Rib height: 1-3/4” • Gauges: 24 ga. standard; 22 ga. optional • Snap-together panel system with factory-applied side-lap sealant • Minimum roof slope over open framing 3:12 • Minimum roof slope over solid substrate 1:12 • Concealed clip designed for unlimited thermal movement MINI-BATTEN • Standing seam roof system • Panel coverages: 12”, 16” or 18” • Rib height: 1” and 1-1/2” with a narrow batten cap • Gauges: 24 ga. standard; 22 ga. optional • Minimum roof slope: 3:12 • Concealed clip secures snap-on batten cap 12" 16" or 18" Coverage 1" 12" 16" or 18" Coverage 1-1/2" 12",16" or 18" Coverage 1-3/4" 12",16" or 18" Coverage 1-3/4" Factory-Applied Sealant (typ.) Flat Pan with Striations CURVED 1” MINI-BATTEN • Standing seam roof system • Panel coverages: 12”, 16” or 18” • Gauges: 24 ga. standard; 22 ga. optional • Minimum radius: 4’-0” pan and batten • Concealed clip designed • Whether it's an accent or an entire roof, Curved Mini-Batten panels give your project a unique look 12",16 " o r 1 8 " C o v e r a g e 5/8" 124 El Dorado Hills Fire Station No. 84 | El Dorado Hills, CA Vertical Seam Roof Panels } Champagne Metallic metalsales.us.com | 9125 Concealed Fastener Wall Systems For a high performance solution, opt for concealed fastener wall systems from Metal Sales. These sleek exterior options give designers a clean aesthetic, with no visible fasteners to interrupt the visual effect. Flex Tech Community College | Cheyenne, WY T10-D, TL-17, TL-17C, TL-17D Wall Panels } Old Town Grey Vertical Seam, T2 Roof Panels } Old Town Grey • Finishes: PVDF and Acrylic Coated Galvalume • Optional Finishes: Metallic, Nova, Prints, Rustica and Kameleon • Optional materials: stainless steel, aluminum and weathering steel • Horizontal and Vertical applications for increased design flexibility • Installs over open framing or solid substrate • Custom capabilities include: Perforated panels for wind screens and liner panels • Contact Metal Sales Technical Services Department and in-house Engineers for the latest Testing and Approval information 126 • Concealed direct-fastened panel for wall, soffit, fascia or liner applications • Panel coverage: 12” • Panel depth: 1-1/2” • 40’-0” maximum length* • Mix and match panel profiles due to common joinery • Gauges: 24 ga. standard; 22 ga., 20 ga. optional * Maximum length is limited only by the possibility of oil canning occurring at longer lengths. To minimize this potential, we recommend specifying 22 gauge or 20 gauge if a long length is desired. Please contact your Metal Sales representative for assistance. TLC SERIES 12" Coverage 1-1/2" 12" Coverage 1-1/2" 12" Coverage 1-1/2" 12" Coverage 1-1/2" 12" Coverage 6" 1-1/2" 12" Coverage 6" 1-1/2" metalsales.us.com | 11 TLC-1 TLC-2 TLC-3 TLC-4 TLC-9 TLC-10 127 • Symmetrical trapezoidal rib profile • Gauges: 24 ga. standard; 22 ga. optional • Weathertight Warranty available • Horizontal and vertical installation • Panel lengths available from 5’-0” to 30’-0” max • Fully integrates with Contempra Series and Empire Series profiles to create unique shadow lines • Universal clip design allows for thermal and seismic movement APEX SERIES™ CONTEMPRA SERIES™ • Asymmetrical trapezoidal rib profile for a unique louver look and feel • Gauges: 24 ga. standard; 22 ga. optional • Weathertight Warranty available • Horizontal and vertical installation • Panel lengths available from 5’-0” to 30’-0” max • Available in a wide variety of colors and finishes • Integrates with Apex Series and Empire Series profiles to create unique shadow lines • Universal clip design allows for thermal and seismic movement 12" Coverage 2-2/3" 1" 16" Coverage 5-1/3" 1" 12" Coverage 2-7/8" 7/8" 16" Coverage 5-1/3" 7/8" Rabbit Hole Distillery | Louisville, KY Empire Series Wall Panels } Mistique Plus, Weathered Copper, Champagne Metallic AP1-1212 AP1-1653 CN88-1212 CN88-1653 128 metalsales.us.com | 13 12" Coverage 7" 1-1/2" EM15-168 EM15-1266 EM15-1275 EM15-1284 EM15-1293 12" Coverage 8" 1-1/2" 12" Coverage 9" 1-1/2" 12" Coverage 6" 1-1/2" 16" Coverage 8" 1-1/2" 12" Coverage 6" 1-1/2" 16" Coverage 2-2/3"2-2/3" 1" 12" Coverage 2-2/3" 1" EMPIRE SERIES™ • Box rib profile offering a unique combination of bold, clean, symmetrical lines • Gauges: 24 ga. standard; 22 ga. optional • Weathertight Warranty available • Horizontal and vertical installation • A wide variety of profiles offers a greater range of design flexibility • Panel lengths available from 5’-0” to 30’-0” max • Integrates with Apex Series and Contempra Series profiles to create unique shadow lines • Universal clip design allows for thermal and seismic movement EM1-1212 EM1-1653 EM15-126 129 TL SERIES • Concealed direct-fastened panel for wall, soffit, fascia or liner applications • Horizontal and vertical installation • Unique box rib profiles combined with flush face panels give your project a cost-effective custom look • Common joinery provides flexibility to mix and match panel profiles for unique design options • Panel coverage: 12” • Panel depth: 1-1/2” • 30’-0” maximum length • Gauges: 24 ga. standard; 22 ga., 20 ga., 18 ga. optional 12" Coverage 1-1/2" 12" Coverage 1-1/2" 4" 12" Coverage 1-1/2" 6" 12" Coverage 1-1/2" 1" 1-1/2” 2”2”6” 12” Coverage 1-1/2” 2”2”2” 12” Coverage 12" Coverage 1-1/2" 2"2" 1-1/2” 4”2”2” 12” Coverage Elite Health Center | Scottsbluff, NE TL-17, TL-17D Wall Panels } Dark Bronze, Linen White TL-1222 TL-17 TL-17A TL-17C TL-17D TL-1224 TL-1226 TL-1262 130 SOFFIT PANEL • Concealed direct-fastened flush panel system for wall, soffit, fascia or liner applications • Panel coverage: 12” • Panel Depth: 1” • Gauge: 24 ga. standard; 0.032” aluminum optional • Perforated aluminum optional • Applies over open framing or solid substrate 1" 12" Coverage 1" 12" Coverage Flat Pan with V-Grooves 1" 12" Coverage 1" 12" Coverage Flat Pan with V-Grooves metalsales.us.com | 15 Flat Pan V-Grooves 131 Exposed Fastener Wall and Roof Systems These Metal Sales panels for roof and wall applications. Wall panels can be installed vertically and horizontally. Our exposed fastener line offers the broadest range of panel profiles, including corrugated, trapezoidal ribs and box-shaped ribs from 3/4" to 4-1/2" panel depths. Costco Wholesale Club | Indianapolis, IN T5, T6-A Wall Panels } Sandstone, Slate Grey • Finishes: PVDF and Acrylic Coated Galvalume • Optional Finishes: Metallic, Nova, Prints, Rustica and Kameleon • Gauges: 24 ga. standard, 22 ga., 20 ga. and 18 ga. optional • Optional materials: stainless steel, aluminum and weathering steel • Horizontal and Vertical applications for increased design flexibility • Installs over open framing or solid substrate • Custom capabilities include: Perforated panels for wind screens and liner panels • Contact Metal Sales Technical Services Department and in-house Engineers for the latest Testing and Approval information 132 T10 SERIES • Exposed direct-fastened panel for wall, soffit, fascia and liner applications • Applies over open framing or solid substrate • Panel coverage: 28”, 30” and 36” • Rib height: 1-1/2” • Gauges: 24 ga. standard; 22 ga., 20 ga., 18 ga. optional • 90° vertical box ribs on 4”, 6” and 9” centers 1-1/2" 28" Coverage 4" 6" 1-1/2" 30" Coverage 6" 1-1/2" 30" Coverage 9" 1-1/2" 36" Coverage metalsales.us.com | 17 T10-A Wall Panel T10-B Wall Panel T10-C Wall Panel T10-D Wall Panel 133 36" Coverage 4-1/2"C 3/4" 3/4" 32" Coverage 4" SLO Brew Rock and Taproom | San Luis Obispo, CA T2630, 7/8" Corrugated } Ash Grey, Old Zinc Grey, Weathering Steel 1" 4" 36" Coverage 1" 6" 36" Coverage 1" 8" 40" Coverage T2 Wall Panel T3 Wall Panel T4 Wall Panel T16-L Wall Panel • Exposed direct-fastened low profile wall panel • Shallow box ribs for easy installation and integration with other wall materials • Panel coverages: 36” and 32” • Rib height: 3/4” • Gauges: 24 ga. standard; 22 ga., 20 ga., 18 ga. optional *Roof panel option for T16-E is available • Minimum roof slope: 1:12 T16-E*, T16-L • Exposed direct-fastened wall and roof panel • Panel coverage: 36” and 40” • Rib height: 1” • Gauges: 24 ga. standard; 22 ga., 20 ga., 18 ga. optional • Trapezoidal rib on 6” and 8” centers *Roof panel options for these profiles are available • Minimum roof slope: 1:12 T2*, T3*, T4* T16-E Wall Panel 134 T5*, T6-A* • Exposed direct-fastened wall and roof panel • Panel coverage: 36” and 40” • Rib height: 1-1/2” • Gauges: 24 ga. standard; 22 ga., 20 ga., 18 ga. optional • Trapezoidal rib on 6” and 8” centers *Roof panel options for these profiles are available • Minimum roof slope: 1:12 30" Coverage 2" 6"C metalsales.us.com | 19 1-1/2" 6" 36" Coverage 1-1/2" 7.2" 36" Coverage 32" Coverage 2" 8"C T6-A Wall Panel T2832 Wall Panel • Exposed direct-fastened roof and wall panel • Deeper ribs for more defined panel lines • Panel coverage: 30” and 32” • Rib height: 2” • Gauges: 24 ga. standard; 22 ga., 20 ga. optional *Roof panel options for these profiles are available • Minimum roof slope: 1:12 T2630*, T2832*T2630 Wall Panel T5 Wall Panel 135 18" Coverage 4-1/2" 6" Alaska Rock Gym | Anchorage, AK TDR-6 Wall Panel } Terra Cotta 24" Coverage 3" 8" 24" Coverage 3" 6" 32" Coverage 8" 3" 24" Coverage 4" 12" TDR-6 Wall Panel T13 Wall Panel T13-A Wall Panel T23 Wall Panel T25 Wall Panel T13, T13-A, T23, T25 • Exposed direct-fastened deep-rib roof and wall panel • Deep ribs for bold, clean lines • Applies over open framing or solid substrate • Panel coverage: 32” • Rib heights: 3” and 4” • Gauges: 24 ga. standard; 22 ga., 20 ga. optional *Roof panel options for these profiles are available • Minimum roof slope: 1:12 TDR-6 • Exposed direct-fastened, deep-rib wall and roof panel • Deep ribs add additional strength making it perfect for roof top equipment screens and wind screens • Panel coverage: 18” • Rib height: 4-1/2” • Gauges: 24 ga. standard; 22 ga., 20 ga. optional *Roof panel options for these profiles are available • Minimum roof slope: 1:12 136 metalsales.us.com | 21 36" Coverage 1-1/2" 7.2" 2-2/3" 32" (Roof Coverage) 7/8" 2-2/3" 7/8" 34-2/3" (Wall Coverage) 36" Coverage 1-1/2" 7.2" Roof Panel Wall Panel 21-1/3" Coverage 1/2" 2-2/3" 24" Coverage 1/2" 2-2/3" Roof Panel Wall Panel IC72-PANEL • Exposed direct-fastened roof and wall panel • Panel coverage: 36” • Rib height: 1-1/2” • Minimum roof slope: 1:12 • Gauges: 24 ga. standard; 22 ga., 20 ga. optional • Classic 7.2" rib spacing 7/8” CORRUGATED • Exposed direct-fastened roof and wall panel • Panel coverages: 32” roof, 34-2/3” wall • Rib height: 7/8” • Gauges: 24 ga. standard; 22 ga., 20 ga. optional • Minimum roof slope: 1:12 2-1/2" CORRUGATED • Exposed direct-fastened roof and wall panel • Roof Panel coverage: 21-1/3” • Wall Panel coverage: 24” • Rib height: 1/2” • Gauge: 24 ga. standard • Minimum roof slope: 3:12 137 Insulated Metal Panel Wall and Roof Systems IMPower Series™ Insulated Metal Panels from Metal Sales deliver the superior thermal capabilities and excellent design flexibility that architects, owners and contractors demand. IMPower Series systems are ideal for multiple building ap- plications – from schools, corporate offices and high-end retailers to airplane hangars, warehouses and sports complexes. Water Treatment Plant | Glenwood Springs, CO HE40 IMPower Wall Panels } Colonial Red Versatile: • Can be used in vertical or horizontal applications More Energy Efficient: • Closed cell Class l fire resistant polyisocyanurate insulation and self-aligning, double interlocking tongue and groove joints with concealed fasteners create an air-and water-tight seal to stabilize interior environments Single Component: • Factory-injected insulation is continuously foamed in-place and integrated with dual metal facing panels to create a single high strength composite Measurable Savings: • Fast one-pass, single component installation eliminates the inefficiencies of multi-piece field assembled wall and roof systems saving in installation time and labor costs 138 IMPOWER SERIES™ 40” 40” 40” 40” 2.062”2.125” 2.125” 2.062”2.125” 1.375” 2.125” • Superior thermal insulation capabilities compared to other insulating materials with an R-value of 8 per inch • Factory-injected foam insulation between dual steel facings • Hidden fastener systems with a variety of profiles, colors, finishes, accessories and trims integrate into any building design • Closed cell insulating core provides approximately R-8 per inch of thickness • Wall Panel Thicknesses: 2”, 2.5”, 3” and 4” • Roof Panel Thicknesses: 2.5”, 3.25”, 4”, 5” and 6” • Gauges: 26 ga. standard, 24 and 22 optional • Finishes: PVDF and SMP metalsales.us.com | 23 SR2 Standing Seam Roof HR3 High Rib Roof DM40 Double Mesa Wall FL40 Flat Wall HE40 Heavy Embossed Wall HE40A AdobeTexture™ Wall ST40 Striated Wall 139 RETRO-MASTER® SYSTEM Solutions for existing flat roofs Retro-Master® is a complete retrofit roof system that easily and affordably transforms old and failing roofs into a new code-compliant and energy-efficient sloped metal roof. As a single-source solution Retro-Master® retrofit roof system is backed by a 20 year weathertight warranty and an industry-leading 45 year paint finish warranty. It is the ideal solution for schools, universities, retail centers, industrial or office building, military or any other building needing a new, long-lasting, high performance roof. Solutions for existing sloped metal roofs Metal-Over-Metal Reroof Solution combines high quality Metal Sales roof panels with a patented Roof Hugger® sub-purlin retrofit framing system to deliver a new, structurally sound roof that will stand the test of time. • Perforated panels are an aesthetic design solution • Wide array of panel profiles • Available gauges: 24, 22, 20 or 18 • Windscreens, balcony railings, equipment and concealment screens, ventilation and interior liner PERFORATION • Non-Insulated panels up to 3” deep • Vertical & Horizontal applications • Profile widths or modules up to 36” • +/- 90 Degrees (Inside – Outside – Double Corners) Corner leg dimensions up to 4’-0” in either direction MITERED CORNERS • Factory and site curving options • Available profiles: Magna-Loc180 and Mini-Batten • Magna-Loc 180: 20’ min radius, no max radius • Mini-Batten: min Convex radius: 4’ min Concave radius: 6’ CURVED PANEL OPTIONS New metal roof panels over existing sloped metal panels. Metal over Metal System New metal roof panels over existing flat roof. Post-Purlin Retrofit System Roof Hugger® New Metal Sales Panel Existing Roof Panel New Metal Sales Panel Existing Flat Roof Post Purlin System 140 Coating Systems Whether your designs reflect rural or urban architecture, our unique colors and paint effects will bring your ideas to life. We offer more than 35 color combinations including the convenient Standard Color range and the Premium Effects selection for both roof and wall panels. These PVDF resin-based coatings contribute to architectural projects’ sustainability goals, offer lower maintenance and longer life-cycles. Meet or exceed codes and standards Our advanced coating technology ensures Metal Sales finishes and colors meet demonstrated energy performance requirements established by ENERGY STAR® and the Cool Roof Rating Council (CRRC) for solar reflectance and thermal emittance for steep sloped and/or low sloped buildings. Certain products may also comply with LEED® and Green Globes rating requirements for steep slope solar reflectance index (SRI). Benefits of cool colors Cool roof colors are offered from an engaging palette of light neutrals to dark saturated hues that respect the environment and help achieve your vision. Cool roofs may also contribute to other strategies for optimizing energy performance. Energy savings and other direct benefits are contingent upon building type, location and use. TOPCOAT Exceptional color duarability and gloss retention BACK COAT Covers primer and ensures consistent color PRIMER Corrosion resistance and bonding PRIMER PRETREATMENT Adhesion, moisture and corrosion protection PRETREATMENT SUBSTRATE Inhibits corrosion SUBSTRATE BARE STEEL Mill certified to meet ASTM standards Substrate materials Our line of durable substrate materials includes steel, stainless steel, weathering steel, copper and aluminum. Your Metal Sales representative has technical information on material and coating compatibility. Steep Sloped Building Low Sloped Building Roof slope > 2:12 Roof slope ≤ 2:12 ENERGY STAR® Initial Solar Reflectance ≥0.25 Initial Solar Reflectance ≥0.65 3 year Solar Reflectance ≥0.15 3 year Solar Reflectance ≥0.50 CRRC® Solar Reflectance ≥ 0.20 Solar Reflectance ≥ 0.70 Thermal Emittance ≥ 0.7 Thermal Emittance ≥ 0.75 LEED® SRI ≥ 29 SRI ≥ 78 Green Globes SRI ≥ 29 SRI ≥ 78 RATING AND CERTIFICATION REQUIREMENTS 1PVDF is at least 70% or Hylar 5000 2 Contact Metal Sales or visit metalsales.us.com for a complete listing of finishes and colors, their energy performance characteristicsand compliance per organization’s requirements. metalsales.us.com | 25141 Technical Support Metal Sales offers deep expertise before, during and after project specification, installation and commission. Our nationwide footprint puts us within reach of most projects. We work closely with architects, contractors, owners and specifiers to ensure that all questions are answered quickly and with full attention to detail. Metal Sales offers responsive technical support nationwide, including product information, guide specifications, technical details, AutoCad drawings and BIM models accessible 24/7 on our website. Our highly trained architectural consultants are ready and available to provide assistance. Remember, field support is never far away. We offer AIA Continuing Education programs to provide architects with learning opportunities on high performance aspects of metal roof and wall systems and their role in sustainable and Net-Zero design. Our in-house architectural design and engineering assistance offers a world-class customer experience, dedicated to making your project a success. Contact Metal Sales to schedule an AIA continuing education course. Bee Research Facility | St. Paul, MN T2630, T13 Wall Panels } Champagne Metallic, Copper Pernny, Dark Bronze 142 metalsales.us.com | 27 PANELS FINISHES GAUGES SUBSTRATES DESIGN KynarMicaMetallicNovaPrintsKameleonRustica24 Gauge Steel22 Gauge Steel20 Gauge Steel18 Gauge SteelAluminumCopperStainless SteelWeathering SteelPerforationMitered CornersCurvingSTANDING SEAM ROOF SYSTEMS Magna-Loc, ML-180 ●●●●●●●●●●● T-Armor Series™●●●●●●●●●●● Snap-Loc 24®●●●●●●●●● Seam-Loc 24®●●●●●●●●● Vertical Seam ●●●●●●●●●●●● Mini-Batten ●●●●●●●●●●● CONCEALED FASTENER WALL SYSTEMS TLC Series ●●●●●●●●●●●● Apex Series™●●●●●●●●●●● Contempra Series™●●●●●●●●●●● Empire Series™●●●●●●●●●●● TL Series ●●●●●●●●●●●●●■ Soffit Panel ●●●●●●●●●●● EXPOSED FASTENER ROOF AND WALL SYSTEMS T10 Series ●●●●●●●●●●●●●●■● T2, T3, T4, T5, T6-A ●●●●●●●●●●●●●●● T16-E, T16-L ●●●●●●●●●●●●●●■● T2630, T2832 ●●●●●●●●●●●●●●● T13, T13-A, T23, T25 ●●●●●●●●●●●●●●● TDR-6 ●●●●●●●●●●●●●●● IC72-Panel ●●●●●●●●●●●●● 7/8" Corrugated ●●●●●●●●●●●● 2 1/2" Corrugated ●●●●●●●●● INSULATED WALL AND ROOF SYSTEMS IMPower Series™●●●● FINISHES AND CAPABILITIES CHART ■ Specific profiles in the series are available for perforation. Contact Metal Sales for more information. 143 Stay Connected: metalsales.us.com 800.406.7387 Contact Us: 1362 ©MS/8-18PROUDLY MAD E IN THE U .S .A.144 MORIN METAL 110 WEST MAIN ST | MOrIN METAl | CUTSHEETS | SEpTEMbEr 8, 2023 | 7 145 Architectural Metal Wall & Roof SystemsColors and Finishes High-Performance Color Coatings, Custom Finish Options and Natural Metals Metal Wall & Roof Systems North America 146 Architectural Metal Wall & Roof Systems Colors and Finishes 2 At Morin®, we thrive on helping customers bring their most challenging design ideas to life. The Morin® Offering Beyond Panels We offer a range of design options including perforations, miter seam corners, cosmetic louvers, folded end panels, curving and custom matched trim for a complete finish. Innovative Design Solutions and Software Morin has the industry’s most versatile single element metal wall and roof panels. We offer over 150 profiles overall and the related design files in any format, including top quality Revit files available for free download at morincorp.com. Our wide range of panel profiles includes the premier integrated wall panels, Matrix, Integrity, and Pulse (MIP). Their common joinery can be easily integrated for thousands of possible combinations and looks. A powerful suite of profiles to work with. Make Morin® a part of your leading-edge design, we can help your project stand out. To find out more and to see the complete range, visit www.morincorp.com 147 Architectural Metal Wall & Roof Systems Colors and Finishes 7 Mix and Match Colors and Profiles 148 Architectural Metal Wall & Roof Systems Colors and Finishes Copper Penny SR:0.49 E:0.87 SRI:56 8 0.8 mil color 0.2 mil primer Substrate Morin Premium Paint Colors Fluropon® Continuum™ is a metalescent brilliant color two-coat mica based fluoropolymer containing 70% polyvinylidene difluoride (PVDF) resins that meet or exceed the most rigorous ASTM and AAMA 2605 standards. Weathered Zinc SR:0.35 E:0.86 SRI:37 Champagne Pearl SR:0.51 E:0.86 SRI:58 Champagne Bronze SR:0.43 E:0.81 SRI:46 Silversmith SR:0.53 E:0.82 SRI:60 Information and samples 149 Architectural Metal Wall & Roof Systems Colors and Finishes Pewter SR:0.40 E:0.86 SRI:43 9 Champagne Gold SR:0.51 E:0.85 SRI:58 Seafoam Green SR:0.49 E:0.86 SRI:56 Medium Gray SR:0.36 E:0.85 SRI:38 TOWNHOUSE - BAY WINDOW CLADDING FINISH 150 Contact Details USA HQ / East 685 Middle Street | Bristol CT 06010 T: 1-800-640-9501 West 10707 Commerce Way | Fontana CA 92337 T: 1-800-700-6140 South 1975 Eidson Drive | DeLand FL 32724 T: 1-800-640-9501 www.morincorp.com Issue: 3 – 18/08/2023 For the product offering in other markets please contact your local sales representative or visit www.morincorp.com Care has been taken to ensure that the contents of this publication are accurate, but Morin Corporation does not accept responsibility for errors or for information that is found to be misleading. Suggestions for, or description of, the end use or application of products or methods of working are for information only and Morin Corporation accepts no liability in respect thereof. Morin proudly partners with Sherwin-Williams® paints to provide Sherwin-Williams’ cool color palette – high- performance, sustainable finishes with many green benefits. When applied to a roof, these select hues are able to contribute to several LEED® credits, including Sustainable Sites (SS) Credit: Heat Island Reduction. These hues are intended to reduce heat islands (thermal gradient differences between developed and undeveloped areas) to minimize impact on microclimates and human and wildlife habitat. As required by LEED’s Sustainable Sites (SS) Credit, Sherwin- Williams’ cool color palette is ENERGY STAR compliant, specifying highly reflective and high-emissivity roofing (emissivity of at least 0.9 when tested in accordance with ASTM 408) for a minimum of 75% of the roof surface. 151 22 Symmetry Roof Series Seeking balance, strength and harmony for the consultant / design communities? Or maybe you are looking for a solid versatile easy to replace panel that is quick to install, roll forms on-site, lengths to 300’. Architectural Metal Wall & Roof Systems Product Portfolio TOWNHOUSE - BAY WINDOW CLADDING SYM-12-0 152 Architectural Metal Wall & Roof Systems Product Portfolio 23 Get all the benefits with Symmetry Roof Series. Weather resistant seam from eave to ridge Significant wind uplift capability Onsite roll-forming in lengths up to 300’ Symmetry panels have the same interlocking clip leg on each side, so two directional install is possible Symmetry roof panel (1 1/2” seam height) can be used on roof slope as low as 1:12. Symmetry roof panel (2”, 2 1/2” and 3” seam height) can be used on roof slopes as low as ½:12 Panel replacement is easier and less expensive with a symmetrical panel Symmetry panel clips are designed to allow unlimited thermal movement The Symmetry panel needs to be fixed in one location along panel length and allowed to thermally move balance of panel length. Please see installation manual for various suggested locations Symmetrical roofs are ideal for roofs with complex geometry Testing Meet the demands of stringent codes with a high performance roofing system. ASTM E1592 Uplift Test UL 580, UL 1897 Uplift Test UL Class A Fire Rating ASTM E1680 Air Infiltration Test ASTM E1646 Water Infiltration Test ASTM E2140 Static Water Test Images are representative and are not specific to any size. With Clip Relief 12” / 16” / 18” 1 1/2” / 2” / 2 1/2” / 3” No Clip Relief 3 Plank Striated Symmetry Joint Symmetry clip Symmetry profile Factory applied hot melt sealant Symmetry batten The panel is symmetrical and does not lap over adjacent panels, it is joined together with a mechanically seamed cap (batten). If one panel is damaged, simply undo the batten and remove that one panel without having to remove any others, allowing for center panel replacement. 12” / 16” / 18” 1 1/2” / 2” / 2 1/2” / 3” 16” / 18” 1 1/2” / 2” / 2 1/2” / 3” 16” / 18” 1 1/2” / 2” / 2 1/2” / 3” TOWNHOUSE - BAY WINDOW CLADDINGSYM-12-0 153 HPC PROJECT MONITORS -projects in bold are permitted or under construction 10/19/2023 Kara Thompson 300 E. Hyman 201 E. Main 333 W. Bleeker 234 W. Francis Skier’s Chalet Steakhouse 101 W. Main (Molly Gibson Lodge) 720 E. Hyman 304 E. Hopkins 930 King 312 W. Hyman 520 E. Cooper Jeff Halferty 110 W. Main, Hotel Aspen 134 E. Bleeker 300 E. Hyman 434 E. Cooper, Bidwell 414-420 E. Cooper, Red Onion/JAS 517 E. Hopkins Lift 1 corridor ski lift support structure 227 E. Bleeker 211 W. Hopkins 204 S. Galena 215 E. Hallam 500 E. Durant 413 E. Main Roger Moyer 300 W. Main 227 E. Main 135 E. Cooper 110 Neale 517 E. Hopkins Skier’s Chalet Lodge 202 E. Main 305-307 S. Mill, Grey Lady 320 E. Hyman (Wheeler Opera House, solar panels) 611 W. Main 132 W. Hopkins 500 E. Durant Jodi Surfas 202 E. Main 305-307 S. Mill, Grey Lady 320 E. Hyman (Wheeler Opera House, solar panels) 611 W. Main 602 E. Hyman Peter Fornell 304 E. Hopkins 930 King 233 W. Bleeker 214 W. Bleeker Barb Pitchford 121 W. Bleeker 312 W. Hyman 132 W. Hopkins 214 W. Bleeker 630 W. Main 420 W. Francis 154 HPC PROJECT MONITORS -projects in bold are permitted or under construction 10/19/2023 Kim Raymond 630 W. Main 205 W. Main Riley Warwick 420 E Durant/Rubey Park 420 W. Francis Need to assign: 209 E. Bleeker, Lift One Park, 931 Gibson 155 Page 1 of 6 427 Rio Grande Place, Aspen, CO 81611-1975 | P: 970.920.5000 | cityofaspen.com Memorandum TO: Aspen Historic Preservation Commission FROM: Stuart Hayden, Planner II, Historic Preservation THROUGH: Kirsten Armstrong, Principal Planner, Historic Preservation MEETING DATE: October 25, 2023 RE: 135 W. Francis St. – Minor Development Review and Relocation, PUBLIC HEARING APPLICANT/OWNER: Francis Street Holdings, LLC Representative: Kim Raymond Architecture + Interiors Location: Street Address: 135 W. Francis St. Legal Description: Lot A and the West one-half of Lot B, Block 56, City and Townsite of Aspen, Pitkin County, Colorado Parcel Identification Number: 2735-124-20-001 Current Zoning & Use: R-6 – Residential Proposed Use: Residential SUMMARY: The applicant requests approval for Minor Development and Relocation to excavate a basement and lightwells, replace and add guardrails at grade, repair existing trim, replace a broken windowpane, and retain unpermitted shed-roof additions. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Historic Preservation Staff recommend Approval with Conditions as explained on pages 4-8 of this memo. Figure 1. 135 W. Francis St. – Site Location Aerial Image 156 Page 2 of 6 427 Rio Grande Place, Aspen, CO 81611-1975 | P: 970.920.5000 | cityofaspen.com BACKGROUND: Constructed as a wood-frame, one-and-a-half-story, L-shaped minor’s cottage in 1885, the dwelling at 135 W. Francis St. had few alterations before City of Aspen Ordinance #77, Series of 1981 designated it a historic property. Sanborn Maps verify the dwelling’s consistent siting on its parcel at the corner of W. Francis St. and N. 1st St. In 1983, the historic building received a wood-frame, one-and-a-half-story, cross-gable rear (south façade) addition with a partial basement accessed via an exterior stairwell on the west façade. Although located toward the back of the 4,500-ft2 parcel, and deferential to the size, form, and material of the historic building, this late addition partially shifted the orientation of the building. This occurred through the introduction of an entrance on the west façade, facilitated by a brick entry porch and walkway to N. 1st St. The prominence of the west façade, on this corner lot, makes readily visible the side entrance, the stairwell guardrail, and an abutting wood and acrylic shed roof of unknown origins. Smaller shed roofs of a similar construction flank the south façade of the rear addition. The City issued A Certificate of No Negative Effect on March 27, 2023, for the construction of a window well at the southwest corner of the structure, exterior wall and door alterations at the bottom of an existing stairwell on the west side of the structure, and repair of several broken windows and patio doors located on the non-historic addition. The removal of the roof over the exterior stair and repair of the affected wall of the historic structure was a condition of this certificate. REQUEST OF THE HISTORICPRESERVATION COMMISSION (HPC) The Applicant is requesting the following land use approvals: • Minor Development (Section 26.415.070.C): to excavate under the rear two-thirds of the historic building, expanding a non-historic basement and adding two egress window wells; to construct horizontal metal guardrails atop each lightwell; to replace the wood guardrail Figure 2. 135 W. Francis St. as seen on the 1904 Sanborn Map. Figure 2. Photograph of the northwest corner of 135 W. Francis St. circa 1980. 157 Page 3 of 6 427 Rio Grande Place, Aspen, CO 81611-1975 | P: 970.920.5000 | cityofaspen.com of exterior stairwell with a horizontal metal guardrail; and to retain three non-historic acrylic and wood roofs. • Relocation (Section 26.415.090): to underpin and stabilize the historic building for the proposed basement excavation. The HPC is the final review authority for Minor Development and Relocation. City Council, however, will have the opportunity to employ the call-up procedure for the relocation of the designated property as set forth in Subsection 26.415.120(c) and (d). Staff will place this notification on the agenda of a regular City Council meeting within 30 days of the approval, or as soon thereafter as is practical under the circumstances. PROJECT SUMMARY: The applicant proposes to underpin and excavate below the historic resource to expand the existing basement of the non-historic rear addition. As proposed, the basement will stop well short of the north façade of the historic resource and will not extend beyond the current building footprint except at the southwest corner of the non-historic addition. Here, one of two proposed egress lightwells will project toward N. 1st St. and abut the non-historic entry porch of the west entrance. The second lightwell is proposed to be located within Zone B, on the east side of the historic resource. This lightwell will have little to no visibility from the street given its 23-foot setback from the front façade and the screening of an existing wood-picket fence. The application proposes metal guardrails with horizontal bars to top both proposed egress lightwells, and the existing exterior subgrade egress stairwell. Although the applicant, in an email dated August 10, 2023, expressed a willingness to remove the wood and acrylic roof from above exterior stairwell, the application still reflects an intent to retain the wood and acrylic roofs above the exterior stairway as well as above two windows at the rear of the building. STAFF EVALUATION The application (LPA-23-058) for minor development and relocation at 135 W. Francis St. deserves commendation for its general approach to satisfying the City’s intent to “draw a reasonable balance between private property rights and the public interest in preserving the City's cultural, historic, and architectural heritage” as set forth in Aspen Land Use Code Chapter Figure 4. North façade of 135 W. Francis St., 2023. Figure 5. West façade of 135 W. Francis St., 2023. 158 Page 4 of 6 427 Rio Grande Place, Aspen, CO 81611-1975 | P: 970.920.5000 | cityofaspen.com 26.415. Some elements and design details proposed therein, however, warrant further consideration. Minor Development: Staff acknowledges that the existing conditions at 135 W. Francis St. disadvantage the current application. The results of previous projects and unpermitted additions do not necessarily meet the most recent iteration of the Historic Preservation Design Guidelines. Whereas parts of LPA-23-058 may mitigate some of these negative impacts, others reinforce them. The wood and acrylic shed roofs on the west and south façades, for one do not meet Guideline 7.8. The roof materials neither “convey a scale, color and texture similar to the original,” nor are “earth tone and have a matte, non-reflective finish.” Unable to locate any approvals for the wood and acrylic roofs in the building permit or land use files, staff made removing the roof from the west façade and making necessary repairs a condition of the Certificate of No Negative Effect from March 27, 2023. Those on the south façade may be relatively less obtrusive but remain no less inconsistent with the Design Guidelines. Staff recommend the removal of these three roofs as a condition to any development approval at 135 W. Francis St. Moreover, the prominent, projecting entryway emphasized by sidelights, transom, porch, and path to N. 1st St., the west façade already detracts from the historic resource, which is, according to Guideline 10.4, to “be the focus of the property, the entry point, and the predominant structure as viewed from the street.” As part of the Certificate of No Negative Effect from March 23, 2023, adding a grate-covered lightwell to the south end of this façade would have minimal impact. Such a design, however, is no longer permitted by Chapter 8.20 of the Aspen Municipal Code as amended by Aspen City Council Ordinance No. 01 Series of 2023. Bars, grilles, covers, screens and similar devices are impermissible over “area wells serving emergency escape and rescue openings.” Installing code-required guardrails around the west façade lightwell adds to the cumulative negative impact of existing conditions by drawing more attention to the non- historic addition. Similarly, the existing subgrade exterior stairway, with its wood guardrail and wood and acrylic roof, connects the historic resource and the non-historic addition, making the historic resource less distinguishable from its non-historic addition. Removing the unpermitted roof and replacing the wood guardrail with a simpler metal guardrail is a good start to paring down the visual imposition of existing conditions. Making the historic resource and the non-historic addition recognizable products of their respective times will, nevertheless, require a broader reconsideration of this façade. Relocating or eliminating the proposed lightwell, or relocating or replacing the exterior stairway with a lightwell would mitigate the cumulative visual impact of these elements. Staff recommend simplifying the west façade, particularly its points of egress. Relocation: The application has yet to meet all of the necessary relocation criteria. The HPC can, nevertheless, reasonably expect the applicant to meet the remaining requirements prior to receiving a building permit. Staff recommend approval of the proposed underpinning and relocation on the condition that the applicant submits a letter from an engineer attesting 159 Page 5 of 6 427 Rio Grande Place, Aspen, CO 81611-1975 | P: 970.920.5000 | cityofaspen.com to the ability of the building to withstand the underpinning and excavation, and provides a $30,000 deposit to the City of Aspen as collateral for the safe execution of this treatment. Figure 6. Southeast corner at 135 W. Francis St., 2023. Figure 7. Southwest corner at 135 W. Francis St., 2023. 160 Page 6 of 6 427 Rio Grande Place, Aspen, CO 81611-1975 | P: 970.920.5000 | cityofaspen.com REFERRAL COMMENTS The application was referred out to other City departments who have requirements that will affect the permit review. The combined referral comments are included as Exhibit C. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommend that the HPC approve LPA-23-058 with the following conditions: 1. Simplify the west façade, particularly its points of egress for staff and monitor review prior to building permit application. 2. Remove the three wood and acrylic roofs. 3. Provide additional information about the design and materials of the historic and proposed foundations for review and approval by staff and HPC monitor prior to applying for a building permit. 4. Locate and place the Fire Department Connection (FDC) hookup and strobe with sensitivity to historic materials and significant architectural features. The casing for the strobe must be white. 5. Provide a relocation plan, a letter from an engineer determining the historic resource capable of withstanding the relocation, and financial assurances of $30,000 for the relocation of the historic home onto a new basement foundation, to be provided prior to building permit submission. ATTACHMENTS Resolution #__, Series of 2023 Exhibit A – Historic Preservation Design Guidelines Staff Findings Exhibit B – Relocation Criteria Staff Findings Exhibit C – Referral Comments Exhibit D – Application 161 HPC Resolution #__, Series of 2023 Page 1 of 3 RESOLUTION #__, (SERIES OF 2023) A RESOLUTION OF THE ASPEN HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION (HPC) GRANTING MINOR DEVELOPMENT AND RELOCATION REVIEW FOR THE PROPERTY LOCATED AT 135 WEST FRANCIS STREET, LEGALLY DESCRIBED AS LOT A AND THE WEST ONE-HALF OF LOT B, BLOCK 56, CITY AND TOWNSITE OF ASPEN, PITKIN COUNTY, COLORADO PARCEL ID: 2735-124-20-001 WHEREAS, the applicant, Francis Street Holdings, LLC, represented by Kim Raymond Architecture + Interiors, has requested HPC approval for Minor Development and Relocation for the property located at 135 West Francis Street, Lot A and the West one-half of Lot B, Block 56, City and Townsite of Aspen, Pitkin County, Colorado; and WHEREAS, Section 26.415.070 of the Municipal Code states that “no building or structure shall be erected, constructed, enlarged, altered, repaired, relocated or improved involving a designated historic property or district until plans or sufficient information have been submitted to the Community Development Director and approved in accordance with the procedures established for their review;” and WHEREAS, for approval of Minor Development Review, the HPC must review the application, a staff analysis report and the evidence presented at a hearing to determine the project’s conformance with the City of Aspen Historic Preservation Design Guidelines per Section 26.415.070.C of the Municipal Code and other applicable Code Sections. The HPC may approve, disapprove, approve with conditions or continue the application to obtain additional information necessary to make a decision to approve or deny; and WHEREAS, for approval of Relocation, the application shall meet the requirements of Aspen Municipal Code Section 26.415.090, Relocation; and WHEREAS, as a historic landmark, the site is exempt from Residential Design Standards review; and WHEREAS, Community Development Department staff reviewed the application for compliance with the applicable review standards and recommended approval of Minor Development and Relocation with conditions; and WHEREAS, HPC reviewed the project on October 25, 2023. HPC considered the application, the staff memo and public comments, and found the proposal consistent with the review standards and granted approval as proposed by a vote of __ to __. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED: That HPC hereby approves Minor Development and Relocation for 135 West Francis Street, Lot A and the West one-half of Lot B, Block 56, City and Townsite of Aspen, Pitkin County, Colorado as follows: 162 HPC Resolution #__, Series of 2023 Page 2 of 3 Section 1: Minor Development Review and Relocation. HPC hereby approves Minor Development and Relocation as proposed with the following conditions: 1. Simplify the west façade in regard to points of egress for staff and monitor review prior to building permit application. 2. Remove the three wood and acrylic roofs. 3. Provide additional information about the design and materials of the historic and proposed foundations for review and approval by staff and HPC monitor prior to applying for a building permit. 4. Locate and place the Fire Department Connection (FDC) hookup and strobe with sensitivity to historic materials and significant architectural features. The casing for the strobe must be white. 5. Provide a relocation plan, a letter from an engineer determining the historic resource capable of withstanding the relocation, and financial assurances of $30,000 for the relocation of the historic home onto a new basement foundation, to be provided prior to building permit submission. Section 2: Material Representations All material representations and commitments made by the Applicant pursuant to the development proposal approvals as herein awarded, whether in public hearing or documentation presented before the Community Development Department, the Historic Preservation Commission, or the Aspen City Council are hereby incorporated in such plan development approvals and the same shall be complied with as if fully set forth herein, unless amended by other specific conditions or an authorized authority. Section 3: Existing Litigation This Resolution shall not affect any existing litigation and shall not operate as an abatement of any action or proceeding now pending under or by virtue of the ordinances repealed or amended as herein provided, and the same shall be conducted and concluded under such prior ordinances. Section 4: Severability If any section, subsection, sentence, clause, phrase, or portion of this Resolution is for any reason held invalid or unconstitutional in a court of competent jurisdiction, such portion shall be deemed a separate, distinct and independent provision and shall not affect the validity of the remaining portions thereof. Section 5: Vested Rights The development approvals granted herein shall constitute a site-specific development plan vested for a period of three (3) years from the date of issuance of a development order. However, any failure to abide by any of the terms and conditions attendant to this approval shall result in the forfeiture of said vested property rights. Unless otherwise exempted or extended, failure to properly record all plats and agreements required to be recorded, as specified herein, within 180 days of the effective date of the development order shall also result in the forfeiture of said vested property rights and shall render the development order void within the meaning of Section 26.104.050 (Void permits). Zoning that is not part of the approved site-specific development plan shall not result in the creation of a vested property right. 163 HPC Resolution #__, Series of 2023 Page 3 of 3 No later than fourteen (14) days following final approval of all requisite reviews necessary to obtain a development order as set forth in this Ordinance, the City Clerk shall cause to be published in a newspaper of general circulation within the jurisdictional boundaries of the City of Aspen, a notice advising the general public of the approval of a site specific development plan and creation of a vested property right pursuant to this Title. Such notice shall be substantially in the following form: Notice is hereby given to the general public of the approval of a site-specific development plan, and the creation of a vested property right, valid for a period of three (3) years, pursuant to the Land Use Code of the City of Aspen and Title 24, Article 68, Colorado Revised Statutes, pertaining to the following described property: 135 W. Francis St. Nothing in this approval shall exempt the development order from subsequent reviews and approvals required by this approval of the general rules, regulations and ordinances or the City of Aspen provided that such reviews and approvals are not inconsistent with this approval. The approval granted hereby shall be subject to all rights of referendum and judicial review; the period of time permitted by law for the exercise of such rights shall not begin to run until the date of publication of the notice of final development approval as required under Section 26.304.070(A). The rights of referendum shall be limited as set forth in the Colorado Constitution and the Aspen Home Rule Charter. APPROVED BY THE COMMISSION at its regular meeting on the 25th day of October, 2023. Approved as to Form: Approved as to Content: __________________________________ __________________________ Katharine Johnson, Assistant City Attorney Kara Thompson, Chair ATTEST: ________________________________ Mike Sear, Deputy City Clerk 164 Page 1 of 7 Exhibit A Historic Preservation Design Guidelines Criteria Staff Findings 26.415.070.C – Certificate of Appropriateness for a Minor Development 1. The review and decision on the issuance of a certificate of appropriateness for minor development shall begin with a determination by the Community Development Director that the proposed project constitutes a minor development. Minor development work includes: a) Expansion or erection of a structure wherein the increase of the floor area of the structure is two hundred and fifty (250) square feet or less or b) Alterations to a building façade, windows, doors, roof planes or material, exterior wall materials, dormer porch, exterior staircase, balcony or ornamental trim when three (3) or fewer elements are affected and the work does not qualify for a certificate of no negative effect or c) Erection or installation of a combination or multiples of awning, canopies, mechanical equipment, fencing, signs, accessory features and other attachments to designated properties such that the cumulative impact does not allow for the issuance of a certificate of no negative effect or d) Alterations that are made to non-historic portions of a designated historic property that do not qualify for a certificate of no negative effect or e) The erection of street furniture, signs, public art and other visible improvements within designated historic districts of a magnitude or in numbers such that the cumulative impact does not allow for the issuance of a certificate of no negative effect. The Community Development Director may determine that an application for work on a designated historic property involving multiple categories of minor development may result in the cumulative impact such that it is considered a major development. In such cases, the applicant shall apply for a major development review in accordance with Subsection 26.415.07.D. 165 Page 2 of 7 Historic Preservation Design Guidelines Review Criteria for 135 W. Francis St. The applicant requests a Minor Development and relocation review to underpin the historic resource, excavate a basement and lightwells, replace and add guardrails at grade, repair existing trim, replace a broken windowpane, and retain unpermitted shed-roof additions. The proposed design must meet applicable Historic Preservation Design Guidelines. Chapter 1: Site Planning & Landscape Design Met Not Met Not Applicable 1.12 Provide an appropriate context for historic structures. Conditional Chapter 2: Rehabilitation - Building Materials Met 2.5 Covering original building materials with new materials is inappropriate. Conditional 2.6 Remove layers that cover the original material. Conditional Chapter 5: Rehabilitation - Porches & Balconies Met 5.6 Avoid adding handrails or guardrails where they did not exist historically, particularly where visible from the street. Conditional Chapter 7: Rehabilitation - Roofs Met 7.8 New or replacement roof materials should convey a scale, color and texture similar to the original. Conditional 7.10 Design gutters so that their visibility on the structure is minimized to the extent possible. Conditional Chapter 9: New Construction - Excavation, Building Relocation & Foundations Met 9.1 Developing a basement by underpinning and excavating while the historic structure remains in place may help to preserve the historic fabric. Met 9.4 Position a relocated structure at its historic elevation above grade. Met 9.5 A new foundation shall appear similar in design and materials to the historic foundation. Conditional Not Met 9.6 Minimize the visual impact of lightwells. Conditional Chapter 10: New Construction - Building Additions Met 10.4 The historic resource is to be the focus of the property, the entry point, and the predominant structure as viewed from the street. Not Met Relevant Historic Preservation Design Guidelines: 1.12 Provide an appropriate context for historic structures. See diagram. • Contemporary planting, walls and other features are not appropriate in Zone A. A more contemporary landscape may surround new development or be located in the rear of the property, in Zone C. • Do not cover areas which were historically unpaved with hard surfaces, except for a limited patio where appropriate. 166 Page 3 of 7 2.5 Covering original building materials with new materials is inappropriate. • Regardless of their character, new materials obscure the original, historically significant material. • Any material that covers historic materials may also trap moisture between the two layers. This will cause accelerated deterioration to the historic material which may go unnoticed. 2.6 Remove layers that cover the original material. • Once the non-historic siding is removed, repair the original, underlying material. 5.6 Avoid adding handrails or guardrails where they did not exist historically, particularly where visible from the street. • If handrails or guardrails are needed according to building code, keep their design simple in character and different from the historic detailing on the porch or balcony. 7.8 New or replacement roof materials should convey a scale, color and texture similar to the original. • If a substitute is used, such as composition shingle, the roof material should be earth tone and have a matte, non-reflective finish. 7.10 Design gutters so that their visibility on the structure is minimized to the extent possible. • Downspouts should be placed in locations that are not visible from the street if possible, or in locations that do not obscure architectural detailing on the building. 9.1 Developing a basement by underpinning and excavating while the historic structure remains in place may help to preserve the historic fabric. • This activity will require the same level of documentation, structural assessment, and posting of financial assurances as a building relocation. 9.4 Position a relocated structure at its historic elevation above grade. • Raising the finished floor of the building slightly above its original elevation is acceptable if needed to address drainage issues. A substantial change in position relative to grade is inappropriate. • Avoid making design decisions that require code related alterations which could have been avoided. In particular, consider how the relationship to grade could result in non- historic guardrails, etc 9.5 A new foundation shall appear similar in design and materials to the historic foundation. • On modest structures, a simple foundation is appropriate. Constructing a stone foundation on a miner’s cottage where there is no evidence that one existed historically is out of character and is not allowed. • Exposed concrete or painted metal flashing are generally appropriate. • Where a stone or brick foundation existed historically, it must be replicated, ideally using stone salvaged from the original foundation as a veneer. The replacement must be similar in the cut of the stone and design of the mortar joints. 167 Page 4 of 7 9.6 Minimize the visual impact of lightwells. • The size of any lightwell that faces a street should be minimized. • Lightwells must be placed so that they are not immediately adjacent to character defining features, such as front porches. • Lightwells must be protected with a flat grate, rather than a railing or may not be visible from a street. 10.2 A more recent addition that is not historically significant may be removed. • For Aspen Victorian properties, HPC generally relies on the 1904 Sanborn Fire Insurance maps to determine which portions of a building are historically significant and must be preserved. • HPC may insist on the removal of non-historic construction that is considered to be detrimental to the historic resource in any case when preservation benefits or variations are being approved. 10.4 The historic resource is to be the focus of the property, the entry point, and the predominant structure as viewed from the street. Staff Findings: Chapters 1, 2, 5, 7, 9, and 10 of the Historic Preservation Design Guidelines are particularly relevant to the application for minor development and relocation of 135 W. Francis St. as broken down into three primary elements for HPC consideration: guardrails of the west façade, wood and acrylic roofs, and underpinning and excavation. Guardrails of the West Façade As amended by Aspen City Council Ordinance No. 01 Series of 2023, Chapter 8.20 of the Aspen Municipal Code makes bars, grilles, covers, screens and similar devices impermissible over “area wells serving emergency escape and rescue openings.” Consequently, adding a lightwell to the southwest corner of 135 W. Francis St. has a different impact on the historic property than considered for the Certificate of No Negative Effect from March 23, 2023. Maintaining a non- historic exterior stairway and adding a new lightwell and the guardrails they require, does not meet Guidelines 1.11-1.13. Providing an “appropriate context for historic structures” requires “simplicity and restraint,” unmet by the proposed set of guardrails spanning much of the broad width of the building. Landscapes between the historic resource and street, such as this, are particularly sensitive. Here, “contemporary planting, walls and other features are not appropriate,” whether they predate the current application, like the non-historic exterior stairway, or not, such as the proposed lightwell. Similarly, the application makes no effort to mitigate the inappropriate covering of “areas which were historically unpaved with hard surfaces” as exemplified here by the concrete stairway. Replacing the non-historic wood with a horizontal metal guardrail affixed to the stairway retaining wall may be an improvement, but also reinforces the inappropriately contemporary nature of this feature. 168 Page 5 of 7 Although Guideline 5.6 explicitly discourages the addition of “handrails or guardrails where they did not exist historically, particularly where visible from the street,” the lightwell proposed for the west side of the non-historic addition necessitates adding new guardrails to a façade easily visible from N. 1st St. Handrails and guardrails also did not exist historically at the location of the non- historic exterior stairwell. While the guideline need not necessarily apply to an element that already exists, legitimizing and memorializing an inappropriate guardrail by approving its replacement may not meet the spirit of the Guideline 5.6. Similarly, Guideline 9.4 discourages “making design decisions that require code-related alterations which could have been avoided,” particularly, those that “result in non-historic guardrails, etc.” The lightwell proposed to abut the walkway on the west façade of the building will result in such a non-historic guardrail. Rather than “minimize the visual impact of lightwells” as called for by Guideline 9.6, the design decision to locate a lightwell on a prominent façade makes it readily visible from N. 1st St. To the extent that it too is a “design decision,” retaining a non-historic exterior stairway that requires code-related non-historic guardrails which could have been avoided also does not meet Guidelines 9.4 and 9.6. The application does not propose to minimize the size of, or to relocate the exterior stairwell despite its clear visibility from N. 1st St. and its immediate adjacency to character-defining features. The application also does not propose removing the exterior stairwell despite permission to remove “a more recent addition that is not historically significant,” as granted in Guideline 10.2 and encouraged by Chapter 10 when “later additions detract from the character of the building, and may obscure significant features.” Because the application does not request preservation benefits or variations, the HPC cannot insist on the removal of this non-historic construction. The application also does not meet Guideline 10.4 wherein “the historic resource is to be the focus of the property, the entry point, and the predominant structure as viewed from the street.” The lightwell proposed for the west side of 135 W. Francis St. adds to the visual complexity and adverse cumulative impact of existing non-historic elements on this broad, visible façade. The prominent, projecting, first-story entryway emphasized by sidelights, transom, porch, and path to the street already makes the non-historic addition look like the primary entry point and predominant part of the building. The nearby exterior stairway further distracts focus away from the historic resource. Eliminating the proposed lightwell, relocating the stairway or proposed lightwell, and/or, removing and replacing the stairway with a simple lightwell may simplify the west façade, mitigating the aforementioned impacts. Staff recommends simplifying the west façade, particularly its points of egress, as a condition of approval for minor development. 169 Page 6 of 7 Wood and Acrylic Roofs Chapters 2 and 7 of Historic Preservation Guidelines apply to the unpermitted wood and acrylic shed roof additions attached to the west and south façades of the house. Staff was unable to locate any approvals for the wood and acrylic roofs in the building permit or land use files, and made removing the roof from the west façade and making associated repairs a condition of the Certificate of No Negative Effect from March 27, 2023. According to Guideline 2.5, “covering original building materials with new materials is inappropriate.” The wood and acrylic roof affixed to the west façade covers original building materials with new materials, not only obscuring part of the historic resource, but also exacerbating the lack of visual distinction between the historic resource and the non-historic addition. Penetrations in the original, underlying material warrant repair work pursuant to Guideline 2.6. None of the wood and acrylic roofs meet Guideline 7.8. The transparent acrylic roofing material fails to “convey a scale, color and texture similar to the original.” They also have neither an earth tone, nor a non-reflective, matte finish. The acrylic roof on the west façade also prevents the simple vertical descent of a critically located downspout. The resulting westward projection of the downspout causes its visibility from the street contrary to Guideline 7.10. Staff recommends the removal of the three acrylic and wood roofs as a condition to any approval. Underpinning and Excavation Although the proposed underpinning and excavation of the building clearly meets Guideline 9.1, whether the application meets Guideline 9.5 or not requires additional information. According to this guideline, “a new foundation shall appear similar in design and materials to the historic foundation.” This necessitates evidence about the historic foundation. Masonry foundations, “must be replicated, ideally using stone salvaged from the original foundation as a veneer.” Any replacement material “must be similar in the cut of the stone and design of the mortar joints.” Staff recommends providing additional information about the design and materials of the historic and proposed foundations. 170 Page 7 of 7 Staff Recommendation: Approval with the following conditions: 1. Simplify the west façade in regard to points of egress for staff and monitor review prior to building permit application. 2. Remove the three wood and acrylic roofs. 3. Provide additional information about the design and materials of the historic and proposed foundations for review and approval by staff and HPC monitor prior to applying for a building permit. 4. Locate and place the Fire Department Connection (FDC) hookup and strobe with sensitivity to historic materials and significant architectural features. The casing for the strobe must be white. 5. Provide a relocation plan, a letter from an engineer determining the historic resource capable of withstanding the relocation, and financial assurances of $30,000 for the relocation of the historic home onto a new basement foundation, to be provided prior to building permit submission. 171 Page 1 of 3 Exhibit B Relocation Criteria Staff Findings 26.415.090.C – Standards for the relocation of designated properties. Relocation for a building, structure or object will be approved if it is determined that it meets any one of the following standards: 1. It is considered a noncontributing element of a historic district and its relocation will not affect the character of the historic district; or 2. It does not contribute to the overall character of the historic district or parcel on which it is located and its relocation will not have an adverse impact on the Historic District or property; or 3. The owner has obtained a certificate of economic hardship; or 4. The relocation activity is demonstrated to be an acceptable preservation method given the character and integrity of the building, structure or object and its move will not adversely affect the integrity of the Historic District in which it was originally located or diminish the historic, architectural or aesthetic relationships of adjacent designated properties; and Additionally, for approval to relocate all of the following criteria must be met: 1. It has been determined that the building, structure or object is capable of withstanding the physical impacts of relocation; 2. An appropriate receiving site has been identified; and 3. An acceptable plan has been submitted providing for the safe relocation, repair and preservation of the building, structure or object including the provision of the necessary financial security. 172 Page 2 of 3 Relocation Review Criteria for 135 W. Francis St. The applicant requests a relocation review to underpin and excavate beneath the historic resource, and thus, must meet the standards for the relocation of designated properties. Relocation for a building, structure or object will be approved if it is determined that it meets any one of the following standards: Met Not Met Not Applicable 1. It is considered a noncontributing element of a historic district and its relocation will not affect the character of the historic district. N/A 2. It does not contribute to the overall character of the historic district or parcel on which it is located and its relocation will not have an adverse impact on the Historic District or property N/A 3. The owner has obtained a certificate of economic hardship. N/A 4. The relocation activity is demonstrated to be an acceptable preservation method given the character and integrity of the building, structure or object and its move will not adversely affect the integrity of the Historic District in which it was originally located or diminish the historic, architectural or aesthetic relationships of adjacent designated properties. Met Additionally, for approval to relocate all of the following criteria must be met Met 1. It has been determined that the building, structure or object is capable of withstanding the physical impacts of relocation. Conditional 2. An appropriate receiving site has been identified. Met 3. An acceptable plan has been submitted providing for the safe relocation, repair and preservation of the building, structure or object including the provision of the necessary financial security. Conditional 173 Page 3 of 3 Staff Findings: Underpinning and excavating under the historic resource is an acceptable preservation method given the character and integrity of the building, and will not adversely affect the integrity of the historic site, or diminish the historic, architectural or aesthetic relationships of adjacent designated properties. In fact, installing a foundation that meets modern standards may help ensure the longevity of the building. Its current site, orientation, and elevation are the most appropriate conditions for the building. Lacking a letter from an engineer determining the resource capable of withstanding the relocation and financial assurances in the amount of $30,000, however, it has yet to be determined that an acceptable plan is in place, and that the building can withstand the physical impacts of underpinning and excavation. As the application otherwise complies with the standards for relocation, and the applicant can reasonably be expected to meet the remaining requirements prior to applying for a building permit, a conditional approval of the proposed relocation is appropriate. Staff Recommendation: Approval with the following conditions: 1. Submission of a letter from an engineer attesting to the ability of the building to withstand the underpinning and excavation to staff and HPC monitor; AND 2. Provision of a $30,000 deposit to the City of Aspen as collateral for the safe underpinning and excavation beneath the historic resource. 174 Memorandum TO: Kim Raymond, KIM RAYMOND ARCHITECTURE+INTERIORS FROM: Stuart Hayden, Planner II, Historic Preservation, Community Development Department DATE: 9/13/2023 PROJECT: LPA-23-058, Minor Development and Relocation COMMENTS: These comments are not intended to be exhaustive, but an initial response to the Land Use application submitted for review. Other requirements may be requested at time of permit. Zoning: 1.Difference between existing and proposed FA: a.The proposed Main Level is shown as 1,593 ft², the existing Main Level is shown as 1,612 ft². This appears to be accounting for the exemption at the top of the new stairs. b.The proposed Upper Level is shown as two different areas of 517 ft² and 129 ft², respectively. The existing Upper Level for the two same area is shown as 518 ft² and 130 ft², respectively. i.It is not readily obvious what exactly is proposed to change that would account for the differences in square footage between existing and proposed? ii.The top run of the interior stairs to the Upper Level appears to not have been deducted for the stair exemption. 1.Please rectify and or explain the differences between the existing and proposed FA numbers and include all applicable stair exemptions. 2.Subgrade calculations appear accurate, as is the allowable floor area and deck exemption allowance in the R-6 Zone District. Please be aware that an in-depth evaluation of the FA and subgrade calculations shall occur at the time of building permit review. 3.On Sheet Z.0.09, there are three tables, all of which appear to be showing the same thing. Please revise to include only one table. The topmost table includes the subgrade calculations and is the most comprehensive of the three. Exhibit C Referral Comments 175 Engineering: 1. Utilities appear that they will have to change due to the nature of construction. Provide a conceptual utility plan. a. Residential water service may not be greater than 4 ECUs per parcel. b. Show that the current transformer has capacity for the increased load. 2. This project appears to be right on the 1,000-ft² threshold for a major engineering review. At building permit, the applicant will need to show that disturbance area is under 1,000 ft² or provide all documents necessary for a major engineering review. If a major engineering review is triggered, the site will need to come into full compliance of all storm water, drainage, public improvements, and utilities standards. a. The project address is in the sidewalk deferred area. A sidewalk will not be required. A curb and gutter or other means of street storm water conveyance will need to be provided. b. The 8-ft gravel parking lane on Francis Street must be maintained. c. WQCV will need to be provided. 3. The fence in the alley must be pulled out of the right of way and onto private property. Parks: No comments. Building: Equip the basement with an approved automatic sprinkler system, and install a fire department connection, pursuant to Aspen Municipal Code Sec. 8.50.020. For approval by the fire code official, submit a minimum of a three-sprinkler head hydraulic calculation. Initial HPC Comments: 1. Remove the unpermitted wood and acrylic shed roofs from all façades of the building and repair the points they penetrate the historic resource, considering: a. Historic Preservation Design Guidelines 7.8: “New or replacement roof materials should convey a scale, color and texture similar to the original. If a substitute is used, such as composition shingle, the roof material should be earth tone and have a matte, non-reflective finish.” b. Aspen Land Use Code Sec. 26.104.100: “Awning. A roof-like cover that projects not less than three (3) feet and not more than five (5) feet from the wall of a building.” 176 2. Remove the grade-level landing and exterior stairway immediately adjacent to the historic resource. The subterranean landing (referred to “Existing Window Well” on the proposed basement floorplan) may be used to construct a less physically and visually impactful lightwell, considering: a. Historic Preservation Design Guidelines 9.6: “Minimize the visual impact of lightwells. • The size of any lightwell that faces a street should be minimized. • Lightwells must be placed so that they are not immediately adjacent to character defining features, such as front porches.” b. Historic Preservation Design Guidelines 5.5: “Avoid adding handrails or guardrails where they did not exist historically, particularly where visible from the street.” c. Historic Preservation Design Guidelines 9.4: “Position a relocated structure at its historic elevation above grade… • Avoid making design decisions that require code related alterations which could have been avoided. In particular, consider how the relationship to grade could result in non-historic guardrails, etc.” 3. Provide additional information about the historic foundation, its design, and materials, considering: a. Historic Preservation Design Guidelines 9.5: “A new foundation shall appear similar in design and materials to the historic foundation. • On modest structures, a simple foundation is appropriate. Constructing a stone foundation on a miner’s cottage where there is no evidence that one existed historically is out of character and is not allowed. • Exposed concrete or painted metal flashing are generally appropriate. • Where a stone or brick foundation existed historically, it must be replicated, ideally using stone salvaged from the original foundation as a veneer. The replacement must be similar in the cut of the stone and design of the mortar joints.” 4. Provide positive drainage away from the historic landmark, preserve the use of natural drainage and treatment systems of the site pursuant to Historic Preservation Design Guidelines 9.5. 177 PRE-APPLICATION CONFERENCE SUMMARY PLANNER: Kirsten Armstrong, Kirsten.Armstrong@aspen.gov DATE: May 11, 2023 PROJECT LOCATION: 135 W. Francis REQUEST: Minor Development, Relocation DESCRIPTION: 135 W. Francis is a Victorian landmark structure on a 4,500-sf corner lot. This property is in the R-6 residential zone district. The historic Sanborn map reveals the original building footprint was altered when the existing non-historic addition was added. Building records indicate an addition was constructed as part of a remodel in the early 1980s. The applicant proposes to expand the subgrade basement level in order to relocate, within the footprint of the home, previously approved interior stairs. Additional changes include the maintenance and repair of exterior components, including the replacement of windows on a non- historic addition, and the removal of a non-historic roof over existing exterior stairs. As the proposal requires the historic resource to be underpinned for excavating a subgrade addition, relocation criteria will be triggered as part of the review process. Additionally, as a historically designated landmark property the applicant may request for historic preservation benefits (Section 26.415.110) including setback variations. HPC review for Minor Development and Relocation are anticipated. Minor Development is a one-step process, where the project may be approved, disapproved, or approved with conditions. HPC will use the Historic Preservation Design Guidelines and the Land Use Code Sections that are applicable to this project to assist with their determinations. RELEVANT LAND USE CODE SECTIONS: Section Number Section Title 26.304 Common Development Review Procedures 26.415.070.C Historic Preservation – Minor Development 26.415.090 Relocation of Designated Historic Properties 26.415.110 Historic Preservation – Benefits 26.575.020 Calculations and Measurements 26.710.040 Medium-Density Residential (R-6) For your convenience – links to the Land Use Application and Land Use Code are below: Land Use Application Land Use Code Historic Preservation Design Guidelines Review by: Staff for completeness and recommendations HPC for final decision Public Hearing: Yes, at Minor Review Neighborhood Outreach: No 178 Referrals: Staff will seek referral comments from the Building Department, Zoning, Engineering and Parks regarding any relevant code requirements or considerations. There will be no Development Review Committee meeting or referral fees. Planning Fees: $1,300 for 4 billable hours of staff time. (Additional/ lesser hours will be billed/ refunded at a rate of $325 per hour.) Referral Agencies Fee: $0. Total Deposit: $1,300. APPLICATION CHECKLIST: Below is a list of submittal requirements for HPC Minor review. Please email the entire application as one pdf to Kirsten.Armstrong@aspen.gov. The fee will be requested after the application is determined to be complete. Completed Land Use Application and signed Fee Agreement. Pre-application Conference Summary (this document). Street address and legal description of the parcel on which development is proposed to occur, consisting of a current (no older than 6 months) certificate from a title insurance company, an ownership and encumbrance report, or attorney licensed to practice in the State of Colorado, listing the names of all owners of the property, and all mortgages, judgments, liens, easements, contracts and agreements affecting the parcel, and demonstrating the owner’s right to apply for the Development Application. Applicant’s name, address and telephone number in a letter signed by the applicant that states the name, address and telephone number of the representative authorized to act on behalf of the applicant. HOA Compliance form (Attached). List of adjacent property owners for both properties within 300’ for public hearing. An 8 1/2” by 11” vicinity map locating the parcel within the City of Aspen. Site improvement survey including topography and vegetation showing the current status, certified by a registered land surveyor, licensed in the state of Colorado. A written description of the proposal (scope of work) and written explanation of how the proposed development and any requests for variations or benefits complies with the review standards and design guidelines relevant to the application. A proposed site plan. Scaled drawings of all proposed structure(s) or addition(s) depicting their form, including their height, massing, scale, proportions and roof plan; and the primary features of all elevations. Existing and proposed floor area calculations. An accurate representation of all building materials and finishes to be used in the development. 179 Supplemental materials to provide a visual description of the context surrounding the designated historic property including photographs and other exhibits, as needed, to accurately depict location and extent of proposed work. Disclaimer: The foregoing summary is advisory in nature only and is not binding on the City. The summary is based on current zoning, which is subject to change in the future, and upon factual representations that may or may not be accurate. The summary does not create a legal or vested right. 180 COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT HOMEOWNER ASSOCIATION COMPLIANCE FORM CITY OF ASPEN 427 RIO GRANDE PL | ASPEN, CO 81611 All applications for a building permit within the City of Aspen are required to include a certification of compliance with applicable covenants and homeowner association policies. The certification must be signed by the property owner or attorney representing the property owner. The following certification shall accompany the application for a permit. ___________________________________ _________ ___________________________ I, the property owner, certify as follows: (pick one) This property is not subject to a homeowners association or other form of private covenant. This property is subject to a homeowners association or private covenant and the improvements proposed in this building permit do not require approval by the homeowners association or covenant beneficiary. This property is subject to a homeowners association or private covenant and the improvements proposed in this building permit have been approved by the homeowners association or covenant beneficiary. I understand the City of Aspen does not interpret, enforce, or manage the applicability, meaning, or effect of private covenants or homeowner association rules or bylaws. I understand that this document is a public document. Owner Signature ____________________________ Date _________________ Owner Printed Name ________________________ OR Owner’s Attorney Signature ___________________________ Date _________________ Owner ’s Attorney Printed Name _______________________ ADDRESS UNIT #PARCEL ID # ADDRESS: ____________________________PERMIT NUMBER: _______________________________ November 2022 181 City of Aspen Community Development Department Aspen Historic Preservation Land Use Packet City of Aspen | 130 S. Galena Street. | (970) 920 5090 Historic Land Use Application Requirements, Updated: March, 2020 Attached is a Development Application for properties listed on the “Aspen Inventory of Historic Sites and Structures” or properties within Aspen’s Historic Districts. Included in this package are the following attachments: 1. Development Application Fee Policy, Fee Schedule, and Agreement for Payment Form 2. Land Use Application Form 3. Submittal Requirements 4. Summary of the Application Process 5. Matrix of Land Use Application Requirements/ Submittal Requirements Key 6. Public Hearing Notice Requirements 7. Affidavit of Notice All applications are reviewed based on the criteria established in the Aspen Municipal Code and “The City of Aspen Historic Preservation Design Guidelines,” both are available on the web at https://library.municode.com/co/aspen/codes/municipal_code under “Title 26” and www.cityofaspen.com, respectively. A CERTIFICATE OF NO NEGATIVE EFFECT may be issued for minor work that does not materially change the historic character of the property or district, and the proposed work is clearly within the adopted design guidelines. A CERTIFICATE OF APPROPRIATENESS must be applied for if the proposed work will make a material changes that alter, diminish, eliminate or effect the historic or architectural character of the property or district in any way. We strongly encourage all applicants to hold a pre-application conference with a Planner in the Community Development Department so that any questions regarding the requirements for submitting a complete application, and the review process, can be addressed. A Preliminary consultation with the Zoning Officer and Building Department is also required in order to determine code compliance and to avoid changes to projects after the review process. 182 City of Aspen Community Development Department Aspen Historic Preservation Land Use Packet City of Aspen | 130 S. Galena Street. | (970) 920 5090 Historic Land Use Application Requirements, Updated: March, 2020 Land Use Review Fee Policy The City of Aspen has established a review fee policy for the processing of land use applications. A flat fee or deposit is collected for land use applications based on the type of application submitted. A flat fee is collected by Community Development for applications which normally take a minimal and predictable amount of staff time to process. Review fees for other City Departments reviewing the application (referral departments) will also be collected when necessary. Flat fees are cumulative – meaning an application with multiple flat fees must be pay the sum of those flat fee. Flat fees are not refundable. A review fee deposit is collected by Community Development when more extensive staff time is required. Actual staff time spent will be charged against the deposit. Various City staff may also charge their time spent on the case in addition to the case planner. Deposit amount may be reduces if, in the opinion of the Community Development Director, the project is expected to take significantly less time to process than the deposit indicates. A determination on the deposit amount shall be made during the pre-application conference by the case planner. Hourly billing shall still apply. All applications must include an Agreement to Pay Application Fees. One payment including the deposit for Planning and referral agency fees must be submitted with each land use application, made payable to the City of Aspen. Applications will not be accepted for processing without the required fee. The Community Development Department shall keep an accurate record of the actual time required for the processing of a land use application requiring a deposit. The City can provide a summary report of fees due at the applicant’s request. The applicant will be billed for the additional costs incurred by the City when the processing of an application by the Community Development Department takes more time or expense than is covered by the deposit. Any direct costs attributable to a project review shall be billed to the applicant with no additional administrative charge. In the event the processing of an application takes less time than provided for by the deposit, the department shall refund the unused portion of the deposited fee to the applicant. Fees shall be due regardless of whether an applicant receives approval. Unless otherwise combined by the Director for simplicity of billing, all applications for conceptual, final and recordation of approval documents shall be handled as individual cases for the purpose of billing. Upon conceptual approval all billing shall be reconciled and past due invoices shall be paid prior to the Director accepting an application for final review. Final review shall require a new deposit at the rate in effect at the time of final submission. Upon final approval all billing shall be again reconciled prior to the Director accepting an application for review of technical documents for recordation. The Community Development Director may cease processing of a land use application for which an unpaid invoice is 30 or more days past due. Unpaid invoices of 90 days or more past due may be assessed a late fee of 1.75% per month. An unpaid invoice of 120 days or more may be subject to additional actions as may be assigned by the Municipal Court Judge. All payment information is public domain. All invoices shall be paid prior to issuance of a Development Order or recordation of development agreements and plats. The City will not accept a building permit for a property until all invoices are paid in full. For permits already accepted, and unpaid invoice of 90 days or more days may result in cessation of building permit processing or issuance of a stop work order until full payment is made. The property owner of record is the party responsible for payment of all costs associated with a land use application for the property. Any secondary agreement between a property owner and an applicant representing the owner (e.g. a contract purchaser) regarding payment of fees is solely between those private parties. 183 City of Aspen Community Development Department Aspen Historic Preservation Land Use Packet City of Aspen | 130 S. Galena Street. | (970) 920 5090 Historic Land Use Application Requirements, Updated: March, 2020 City Use: Fees Due: $ Received $ Agreement to Pay Application Fees An agreement between the City of Aspen (“City”) and Property Phone No.: Owner (“I”): Email: Address of Billing Property: Address: (Subject of (send bills here) application) I understand that the City has adopted, via Ordinance No., Series of 2011, review fees for Land Use applications and payment of these fees is a condition precedent to determining application completeness. I understand that as the property owner that I am responsible for paying all fees for this development application. For flat fees and referral fees: I agree to pay the following fees for the services indicated. I understand that these flat fees are non-refundable. $ flat fee for $ flat fee for $ flat fee for $ flat fee for For Deposit cases only: The City and I understand that because of the size, nature or scope of the proposed project, it is not possible at this time to know the full extent or total costs involved in processing the application. I understand that additional costs over and above the deposit may accrue. I understand and agree that it is impracticable for City staff to complete processing, review and presentation of sufficient information to enable legally required findings to be made for project consideration, unless invoices are paid in full. The City and I understand and agree that invoices mailed by the City to the above listed billing address and not returned to the City shall be considered by the City as being received by me. I agree to remit payment within 30 days of presentation of an invoice by the City for such services. I have read, understood, and agree to the Land Use Review Fee Policy including consequences for no-payment. I agree to pay the following initial deposit amounts for the specified hours of staff time. I understand that payment of a deposit does not render and application complete or compliant with approval criteria. If actual recorded costs exceed the initial deposit, I agree to pay additional monthly billings to the City to reimburse the City for the processing of my application at the hourly rates hereinafter stated. $ deposit for hours of Community Development Department staff time. Additional time above the deposit amount will be billed at $325.00 per hour. $ deposit for hours of Engineering Department staff time. Additional time above the deposit amount will be billed at $325.00 per hour. City of Aspen: Property Owner: Phillip Supino, AICP Community Development Director Name: Title: 184 City of Aspen Community Development Department Aspen Historic Preservation Land Use Packet City of Aspen | 130 S. Galena Street. | (970) 920 5090 Historic Land Use Application Requirements, Updated: March, 2020 ATTACHMENT 2 - Historic Preservation Land Use Application PROJECT: APPLICANT: Name: Address: Phone #: Fax#: E-mail: REPRESENTATIVE: Name: Address: Phone #: Fax#: E-mail: TYPE OF APPLICATION: (please check all that apply): EXISTING CONDITIONS: (description of existing buildings, uses, previous approvals, etc.) PROPOSAL: (description of proposed buildings, uses, modifications, etc.) Name: Location: (Indicate street address, lot & block number or metes and bounds description of property) Parcel ID # (REQUIRED) Historic Designation Certificate of No Negative Effect Certificate of Appropriateness Minor Historic Development Major Historic Development Conceptual Historic Development Final Historic Development Relocation (temporary, on or off-site) Demolition (total demolition) Substantial Amendment Historic Landmark Lot Split 185 City of Aspen Community Development Department Aspen Historic Preservation Land Use Packet City of Aspen | 130 S. Galena Street. | (970) 920 5090 Historic Land Use Application Requirements, Updated: March, 2020 General Information Please check the appropriate boxes below and submit this page along with your application. This information will help us review your plans and, if necessary, coordinate with other agencies that may be involved. YES NO Does the work you are planning include exterior work; including additions, demolitions, new construction, remodeling, rehabilitation or restoration? Does the work you are planning include interior work, including remodeling, rehabilitation, or restoration? Do you plan other future changes or improvements that could be reviewed at this time? In addition to City of Aspen approval for a Certificate of Appropriateness or No Negative Effect and a building permit, are you seeking to meet the Secretary of the Interior’s Standards for Rehabilitation or restoration of a National Register of Historic Places Property in order to qualify for state or federal tax credits? If yes, are you seeking federal rehabilitation investment tax credits in Conjunction with this project? (Only income producing properties listed on the National Register are eligible. Owner-occupied residential properties are not.) If yes, are you seeking the Colorado State Income Tax Credit for Historical Preservation? Please check all City of Aspen Historic Preservation Benefits which you plan to use: Rehabilitation Loan Fund Dimensional Variances Tax Credits Increased Density Conservation Easement Program Waiver of Park Dedication Fees Conditional Uses Historic Landmark Lot Split 186 187 This page is only a part of a 2016 ALTA® Commitment for Title Insurance issued by First American Title Insurance Company. This Commitment is not valid without the Notice; the Commitment to Issue Policy; the Commitment Conditions; Schedule A; Schedule B, Part I—Requirements; Schedule B, Part II—Exceptions; and a counter-signature by the Company or its issuing agent that may be in electronic form. Copyright 2006-2016 American Land Title Association. All rights reserved. The use of this Form (or any derivative thereof) is restricted to ALTA licensees and ALTA members in good standing as of the date of use. All other uses are prohibited. Reprinted under license from the American Land Title Association. Form 5030000 (1-31-17)Page 1 of 16 ALTA Commitment for Title Insurance (8-1-16) ALTA Commitment for Title Insurance ISSUED BY First American Title Insurance Company Commitment COMMITMENT FOR TITLE INSURANCE Issued By FIRST AMERICAN TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY NOTICE IMPORTANT—READ CAREFULLY: THIS COMMITMENT IS AN OFFER TO ISSUE ONE OR MORE TITLE INSURANCE POLICIES. ALL CLAIMS OR REMEDIES SOUGHT AGAINST THE COMPANY INVOLVING THE CONTENT OF THIS COMMITMENT OR THE POLICY MUST BE BASED SOLELY IN CONTRACT. THIS COMMITMENT IS NOT AN ABSTRACT OF TITLE, REPORT OF THE CONDITION OF TITLE, LEGAL OPINION, OPINION OF TITLE, OR OTHER REPRESENTATION OF THE STATUS OF TITLE. THE PROCEDURES USED BY THE COMPANY TO DETERMINE INSURABILITY OF THE TITLE, INCLUDING ANY SEARCH AND EXAMINATION, ARE PROPRIETARY TO THE COMPANY, WERE PERFORMED SOLELY FOR THE BENEFIT OF THE COMPANY, AND CREATE NO EXTRACONTRACTUAL LIABILITY TO ANY PERSON, INCLUDING A PROPOSED INSURED. THE COMPANY’S OBLIGATION UNDER THIS COMMITMENT IS TO ISSUE A POLICY TO A PROPOSED INSURED IDENTIFIED IN SCHEDULE A IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE TERMS AND PROVISIONS OF THIS COMMITMENT. THE COMPANY HAS NO LIABILITY OR OBLIGATION INVOLVING THE CONTENT OF THIS COMMITMENT TO ANY OTHER PERSON. COMMITMENT TO ISSUE POLICY Subject to the Notice; Schedule B, Part I—Requirements; Schedule B, Part II—Exceptions; and the Commitment Conditions,First American Title Insurance Company, a Colorado Corporation (the "Company"), commits to issue the Policy according to the terms and provisions of this Commitment. This Commitment is effective as of the Commitment Date shown in Schedule A for each Policy described in Schedule A, only when the Company has entered in Schedule A both the specified dollar amount as the Proposed Policy Amount and the name of the Proposed Insured. If all of the Schedule B, Part I—Requirements have not been met within six months after the Commitment Date, this Commitment terminates and the Company’s liability and obligation end. First American Title Insurance Company If this jacket was created electronically, it constitutes an original document. 188 This page is only a part of a 2016 ALTA® Commitment for Title Insurance issued by First American Title Insurance Company. This Commitment is not valid without the Notice; the Commitment to Issue Policy; the Commitment Conditions; Schedule A; Schedule B, Part I—Requirements; Schedule B, Part II—Exceptions; and a counter-signature by the Company or its issuing agent that may be in electronic form. Copyright 2006-2016 American Land Title Association. All rights reserved. The use of this Form (or any derivative thereof) is restricted to ALTA licensees and ALTA members in good standing as of the date of use. All other uses are prohibited. Reprinted under license from the American Land Title Association. Form 5030000 (1-31-17)Page 2 of 16 ALTA Commitment for Title Insurance (8-1-16) COMMITMENT CONDITIONS 1.DEFINITIONS (a) "Knowledge" or "Known": Actual or imputed knowledge, but not constructive notice imparted by the Public Records. (b) "Land": The land described in Schedule A and affixed improvements that by law constitute real property. The term "Land" does not include any property beyond the lines of the area described in Schedule A, nor any right, title, interest, estate, or easement in abutting streets, roads, avenues, alleys, lanes, ways, or waterways, but this does not modify or limit the extent that a right of access to and from the Land is to be insured by the Policy. (c) "Mortgage": A mortgage, deed of trust, or other security instrument, including one evidenced by electronic means authorized by law. (d) "Policy": Each contract of title insurance, in a form adopted by the American Land Title Association, issued or to be issued by the Company pursuant to this Commitment. (e) "Proposed Insured": Each person identified in Schedule A as the Proposed Insured of each Policy to be issued pursuant to this Commitment. (f) "Proposed Policy Amount": Each dollar amount specified in Schedule A as the Proposed Policy Amount of each Policy to be issued pursuant to this Commitment. (g) "Public Records": Records established under state statutes at the Commitment Date for the purpose of imparting constructive notice of matters relating to real property to purchasers for value and without Knowledge. (h) "Title": The estate or interest described in Schedule A. 2. If all of the Schedule B, Part I—Requirements have not been met within the time period specified in the Commitment to Issue Policy, this Commitment terminates and the Company’s liability and obligation end. 3. The Company’s liability and obligation is limited by and this Commitment is not valid without: (a) the Notice; (b) the Commitment to Issue Policy; (c) the Commitment Conditions; (d) Schedule A; (e) Schedule B, Part I—Requirements; (f) Schedule B, Part II—Exceptions; and (g) a counter-signature by the Company or its issuing agent that may be in electronic form. 4.COMPANY’S RIGHT TO AMEND The Company may amend this Commitment at any time. If the Company amends this Commitment to add a defect, lien, encumbrance, adverse claim, or other matter recorded in the Public Records prior to the Commitment Date, any liability of the Company is limited by Commitment Condition 5. The Company shall not be liable for any other amendment to this Commitment. 5.LIMITATIONS OF LIABILITY (a) The Company’s liability under Commitment Condition 4 is limited to the Proposed Insured’s actual expense incurred in the interval between the Company’s delivery to the Proposed Insured of the Commitment and the delivery of the amended Commitment, resulting from the Proposed Insured’s good faith reliance to: (i) comply with the Schedule B, Part I—Requirements; (ii) eliminate, with the Company’s written consent, any Schedule B, Part II—Exceptions; or (iii) acquire the Title or create the Mortgage covered by this Commitment. (b) The Company shall not be liable under Commitment Condition 5(a) if the Proposed Insured requested the amendment or had Knowledge of the matter and did not notify the Company about it in writing. (c) The Company will only have liability under Commitment Condition 4 if the Proposed Insured would not have incurred the expense had the Commitment included the added matter when the Commitment was first delivered to the Proposed Insured. 189 This page is only a part of a 2016 ALTA® Commitment for Title Insurance issued by First American Title Insurance Company. This Commitment is not valid without the Notice; the Commitment to Issue Policy; the Commitment Conditions; Schedule A; Schedule B, Part I—Requirements; Schedule B, Part II—Exceptions; and a counter-signature by the Company or its issuing agent that may be in electronic form. Copyright 2006-2016 American Land Title Association. All rights reserved. The use of this Form (or any derivative thereof) is restricted to ALTA licensees and ALTA members in good standing as of the date of use. All other uses are prohibited. Reprinted under license from the American Land Title Association. Form 5030000 (1-31-17)Page 3 of 16 ALTA Commitment for Title Insurance (8-1-16) (d) The Company’s liability shall not exceed the lesser of the Proposed Insured’s actual expense incurred in good faith and described in Commitment Conditions 5(a)(i) through 5(a)(iii) or the Proposed Policy Amount. (e) The Company shall not be liable for the content of the Transaction Identification Data, if any. (f) In no event shall the Company be obligated to issue the Policy referred to in this Commitment unless all of the Schedule B, Part I—Requirements have been met to the satisfaction of the Company. (g) In any event, the Company’s liability is limited by the terms and provisions of the Policy. 6.LIABILITY OF THE COMPANY MUST BE BASED ON THIS COMMITMENT (a) Only a Proposed Insured identified in Schedule A, and no other person, may make a claim under this Commitment. (b) Any claim must be based in contract and must be restricted solely to the terms and provisions of this Commitment. (c) Until the Policy is issued, this Commitment, as last revised, is the exclusive and entire agreement between the parties with respect to the subject matter of this Commitment and supersedes all prior commitment negotiations, representations, and proposals of any kind, whether written or oral, express or implied, relating to the subject matter of this Commitment. (d) The deletion or modification of any Schedule B, Part II—Exception does not constitute an agreement or obligation to provide coverage beyond the terms and provisions of this Commitment or the Policy. (e) Any amendment or endorsement to this Commitment must be in writing and authenticated by a person authorized by the Company. (f) When the Policy is issued, all liability and obligation under this Commitment will end and the Company’s only liability will be under the Policy. 7.IF THIS COMMITMENT HAS BEEN ISSUED BY AN ISSUING AGENT The issuing agent is the Company’s agent only for the limited purpose of issuing title insurance commitments and policies. The issuing agent is not the Company’s agent for the purpose of providing closing or settlement services. 8.PRO-FORMA POLICY The Company may provide, at the request of a Proposed Insured, a pro-forma policy illustrating the coverage that the Company may provide. A pro-forma policy neither reflects the status of Title at the time that the pro-forma policy is delivered to a Proposed Insured, nor is it a commitment to insure. 9.ARBITRATION The Policy contains an arbitration clause. All arbitrable matters when the Proposed Policy Amount is $2,000,000 or less shall be arbitrated at the option of either the Company or the Proposed Insured as the exclusive remedy of the parties. A Proposed Insured may review a copy of the arbitration rules at http://www.alta.org/arbitration. 190 This page is only a part of a 2016 ALTA® Commitment for Title Insurance issued by First American Title Insurance Company. This Commitment is not valid without the Notice; the Commitment to Issue Policy; the Commitment Conditions; Schedule A; Schedule B, Part I—Requirements; Schedule B, Part II—Exceptions; and a counter-signature by the Company or its issuing agent that may be in electronic form. Copyright 2006-2016 American Land Title Association. All rights reserved. The use of this Form (or any derivative thereof) is restricted to ALTA licensees and ALTA members in good standing as of the date of use. All other uses are prohibited. Reprinted under license from the American Land Title Association. Form 5033708-A (4-9-18)Page 4 of 16 ALTA Commitment for Title Insurance (8-1-16) Colorado - Schedule A ALTA Commitment for Title Insurance ISSUED BY First American Title Insurance Company Schedule A Transaction Identification Data for reference only: Issuing Agent:Winter VanAlstine Issuing Office:Attorneys Title Insurance Agency of Aspen, LLC Issuing Office's ALTA® Registry ID: 1019587 Loan ID No.: Commitment No.:20004632 Issuing Office File No.:20004632 Property Address:135 West Francis Street, Aspen, CO 81611 SCHEDULE A 1. Commitment Date: November 6, 2020 at 07:45 AM 2. Policy or Policies to be issued: Amount Premium A.ALTA Owners Policy (06/17/06)$6,000,000.00 $10,270.00 Proposed Insured:Koufax LLC, a Colorado limited liability company Certificate of Taxes Due $25.00 Endorsements: CO-110.1 (Delete 1, 2, 3, 4)$75.00 Additional Charges:$0 B.ALTA Loan Policy (06/17/06)$2,880,000.00 $150.00 Proposed Insured:FirstBank, its successors and/or assigns as their interests may appear Endorsements: CO-100 (Comprehensive Improved Land)$50.00 CO-110.1 (Delete 1, 2, 3, 4)$25.00 Additional Charges:$0 Total $10,595.00 3. The estate or interest in the land described or referred to in this Commitment is Fee simple. 4. The Title is, at the Commitment Date, vested in: Fabry Family Trust 191 SCHEDULE A (Continued) This page is only a part of a 2016 ALTA® Commitment for Title Insurance issued by First American Title Insurance Company. This Commitment is not valid without the Notice; the Commitment to Issue Policy; the Commitment Conditions; Schedule A; Schedule B, Part I—Requirements; Schedule B, Part II—Exceptions; and a counter-signature by the Company or its issuing agent that may be in electronic form. Copyright 2006-2016 American Land Title Association. All rights reserved. The use of this Form (or any derivative thereof) is restricted to ALTA licensees and ALTA members in good standing as of the date of use. All other uses are prohibited. Reprinted under license from the American Land Title Association. Form 5033708-A (4-9-18)Page 5 of 16 ALTA Commitment for Title Insurance (8-1-16) Colorado - Schedule A 5. The land referred to in the Commitment is described as follows: SEE EXHIBIT A ATTACHED HERETO For informational purposes only, the property address is: 135 West Francis Street, Aspen, CO 81611. Attorneys Title Insurance Agency of Aspen, LLC By: Winter VanAlstine Authorized Officer or Agent FOR INFORMATION PURPOSED OR SERVICES IN CONNECTION WITH THIS COMMITMENT, CONTACT: Attorneys Title Insurance Agency of Aspen, LLC,715 West Main Street, Suite 202, Aspen, CO 81611, Phone: 970 925-7328, Fax: 970 925-7348. 192 This page is only a part of a 2016 ALTA® Commitment for Title Insurance issued by First American Title Insurance Company. This Commitment is not valid without the Notice; the Commitment to Issue Policy; the Commitment Conditions; Schedule A; Schedule B, Part I—Requirements; Schedule B, Part II—Exceptions; and a counter-signature by the Company or its issuing agent that may be in electronic form. Copyright 2006-2016 American Land Title Association. All rights reserved. The use of this Form (or any derivative thereof) is restricted to ALTA licensees and ALTA members in good standing as of the date of use. All other uses are prohibited. Reprinted under license from the American Land Title Association. Form 5030008-BI&BII (5-18-17)Page 6 of 16 ALTA Commitment for Title Insurance (8-1-16) Colorado - Schedule BI & BII ALTA Commitment for Title Insurance ISSUED BY First American Title Insurance Company Schedule BI & BII Commitment No: 20004632 SCHEDULE B, PART I Requirements All of the following Requirements must be met: 1.The Proposed Insured must notify the Company in writing of the name of any party not referred to in this Commitment who will obtain an interest in the Land or who will make a loan on the Land. The Company may then make additional Requirements or Exceptions. 2.Pay the agreed amount for the estate or interest to be insured. 3.Pay the premiums, fees, and charges for the Policy to the Company. 4.Documents satisfactory to the Company that convey the Title or create the Mortgage to be insured, or both, must be properly authorized, executed, delivered, and recorded in the Public Records. 5.Payment of all taxes and assessments now due and payable as shown on a certificate of taxes due from the County Treasurer or the County Treasurer's Authorized Agent. 6.Evidence that all assessments for common expenses, if any, have been paid. 7.Final Affidavit and Agreement executed by Owners and/or Purchasers must be provided to the Company 8.Special Warranty Deed must be sufficient to convey the fee simple estate or interest in the land described or referred to herein, from the Fabry Family Trust, to Koufax LLC, a Colorado limited liability company, the proposed insured, Schedule A, item 2A. NOTE: C.R.S. Section 38-35-109(2) requires that a notation of the purchaser's legal address, (not necessarily the same as the property address) be included on the face of the Deed to be recorded. 9.Full disclosure from Seller, of any monetary liens and open Deeds of Trust of record. If you have any knowledge of an outstanding obligation secured by the subject property, you must contact us immediately for further review prior to closing. 10.Deed of Trust from Koufax LLC, a Colorado limited liability company to the Public Trustee of Pitkin County for the benefit of FirstBank to secure an indebtedness in the principal sum of $2,880,000.00. 11.A true and correct copy of the Trust Agreement which creates the Fabry Family Trust, providing, among other things, the designation of the trustee(s) and specification of the trustee(s) powers under that trust. 193 ALTA Commitment for Title Insurance ISSUED BY First American Title Insurance Company Schedule BI & BII (Cont.) Form 50-CO-Disclosure (4-1-16)Page 7 of 16 Disclosure Statement (5-1-15) Colorado 12.Record a Statement of Authority to provide prima facie evidence of existence of Fabry Family Trust, an entity capable of holding property, and the name of the person authorized to execute instruments affecting title to real property as authorized by C.R.S. Section 38-30-172 and C.R.S. Section 38-30-108.5. 13.A copy of the properly signed and executed Operating Agreement if written, for Koufax LLC, a Colorado limited liability company, to be submitted to the Company for review. 14.Certificate of Good Standing from the Colorado Secretary of State for Koufax LLC, a Colorado limited liability company. 15.Record a Statement of Authority to provide prima facie evidence of existence of Koufax LLC, a Colorado limited liability company, an entity capable of holding property, and the name of the person authorized to execute instruments affecting title to real property as authorized by C.R.S. Section 38-30-172. 16.Receipt by the Company of the appropriate Lease Affidavit indemnifying the Company against any existing leases or tenancies, and any and all parties claiming by, through or under said lessees. 17.Improvement Survey Plat sufficient in form, content and certification acceptable to the Company. Exception will be taken to adverse matters disclosed thereby. 18.This Title Commitment is subject to underwriter approval. 194 This page is only a part of a 2016 ALTA® Commitment for Title Insurance issued by First American Title Insurance Company. This Commitment is not valid without the Notice; the Commitment to Issue Policy; the Commitment Conditions; Schedule A; Schedule B, Part I—Requirements; Schedule B, Part II—Exceptions; and a counter-signature by the Company or its issuing agent that may be in electronic form. Copyright 2006-2016 American Land Title Association. All rights reserved. The use of this Form (or any derivative thereof) is restricted to ALTA licensees and ALTA members in good standing as of the date of use. All other uses are prohibited. Reprinted under license from the American Land Title Association. Form 5030008-BI&BII (5-18-17)Page 8 of 16 ALTA Commitment for Title Insurance (8-1-16) Colorado - Schedule BI & BII ALTA Commitment for Title Insurance ISSUED BY First American Title Insurance Company Schedule BI & BII (Cont.) Commitment No.: 20004632 SCHEDULE B, PART II Exceptions THIS COMMITMENT DOES NOT REPUBLISH ANY COVENANT, CONDITION, RESTRICTION, OR LIMITATION CONTAINED IN ANY DOCUMENT REFERRED TO IN THIS COMMITMENT TO THE EXTENT THAT THE SPECIFIC COVENANT, CONDITION, RESTRICTION, OR LIMITATION VIOLATES STATE OR FEDERAL LAW BASED ON RACE, COLOR, RELIGION, SEX, SEXUAL ORIENTATION, GENDER IDENTITY, HANDICAP, FAMILIAL STATUS, OR NATIONAL ORIGIN. The Policy will not insure against loss or damage resulting from the terms and provisions of any lease or easement identified in Schedule A, and will include the following Exceptions unless cleared to the satisfaction of the Company: 1.Any facts, rights, interests or claims which are not shown by the Public Records, but which could be ascertained by an inspection of the Land or by making inquiry of persons in possession thereof. 2.Easements, or claims of easements, not shown by the Public Records. 3.Discrepancies, conflicts in boundary lines, shortage in area, encroachments, and any facts which a correct land survey and inspection of the Land would disclose, and which are not shown by the Public Records. 4.Any lien, or right to a lien, for services, labor or material theretofore or hereafter furnished, imposed by law and not shown in the Public Records. 5.Any defect, lien, encumbrance, adverse claim, or other matter that appears for the first time in the Public Records or is created, attaches, or is disclosed between the Commitment Date and the date on which all of the Schedule B, Part I—Requirements are met. Note: Exception number 5. will be removed from the policy provided the Company conducts the closing and settlement service for the transaction identified in the commitment 6.Any and all unpaid taxes, assessments and unredeemed tax sales. 7.Unpatented mining claims; reservations or exceptions in patents or in Acts authorizing the issuance thereof. 8.Any water rights, claims of title to water, in, on or under the Land. 9.Taxes and assessments for the year 2020, and subsequent years, a lien not yet due or payable. 195 ALTA Commitment for Title Insurance ISSUED BY First American Title Insurance Company Schedule BI & BII (Cont.) Form 50-CO-Disclosure (4-1-16)Page 9 of 16 Disclosure Statement (5-1-15) Colorado 10.Terms, conditions, provisions, agreements and obligations specified under the Act authorizing the issuance of the Patent for the City and Townsite of Aspen, recorded March 1, 1897, in Book 139 at Page 216 as Reception No. 060156. 11.Terms, conditions, provisions, agreements and obligations specified under Ordinance No. 6 (series of 1959, An Ordinance Accepting a Map Entitled "Official Map of the City of Aspen, Pitkin County, State of Colorado," as the Official Map of the City of Aspen: Providing for Dedication of all Streets and Alleys, Except Such Streets and Alleys Heretofore Vacated; And Providing for the Filing of Said Map, Field Notes, and Supplemental Plats with the Clerk and Recorder for Pitkin County, dated November 2, 1959, and recorded December 18, 1959, in Book 189 at Page 354 as Reception No. 109043; and any and all notes, easements and recitals as disclosed on the Willets Map recorded November 12, 1969 in Plat Book 4 at Page 27 as Reception No. 137902. 12.Any existing leases or tenancies, and any and all parties claiming by, through or under said lessees. NOTE: Upon receipt of a Lease Affidavit from Seller, this exception will not appear on the final title policy. 196 Form 5000000-EX (7-1-14)Page 10 of 16 Exhibit A ALTA Commitment for Title Insurance ISSUED BY First American Title Insurance Company Exhibit A File No.: 20004632 The Land referred to herein below is situated in the County of Pitkin, State of Colorado, and is described as follows: Lot A and the West One-half of Lot B, Block 56, City and Townsite of Aspen, Pitkin County, Colorado. 197 Form 50-CO-Disclosure (4-1-16)Page 11 of 16 Disclosure Statement (5-1-15) Colorado DISCLOSURE STATEMENT Pursuant to C.R.S. 30-10-406(3)(a) all documents received for recording or filing in the Clerk and Recorder’s office shall contain a top margin of at least one inch and a left, right and bottom margin of at least one-half of an inch. The Clerk and Recorder will refuse to record or file any document that does not conform to the requirements of this section. NOTE: If this transaction includes a sale of the property and the price exceeds $100,000.00, the seller must comply with the disclosure/withholding provisions of C.R.S. 39-22-604.5 (Nonresident withholding). NOTE: Colorado Division of Insurance Regulations 8-1-2 requires that “Every title insurance company shall be responsible to the proposed insured(s) subject to the terms and conditions of the title commitment, other than the effective date of the title commitment, for all matters which appear of record prior to the time of recording whenever the title insurance company, or its agent, conducts the closing and settlement service that is in conjunction with its issuance of an owner’s policy of title insurance and is responsible for the recording and filing of legal documents resulting from the transaction which was closed. Pursuant to C.R.S. 10-11-122, the company will not issue its owner’s policy or owner’s policies of title insurance contemplated by this commitment until it has been provided a Certificate of Taxes due or other equivalent documentation from the County Treasurer or the County Treasurer’s authorized agent; or until the Proposed Insured has notified or instructed the company in writing to the contrary. The subject property may be located in a special taxing district. A Certificate of Taxes due listing each taxing jurisdiction shall be obtained from the County Treasurer or the County Treasurer’s authorized agent. Information regarding special districts and the boundaries of such districts may be obtained from the Board of County Commissioners, the County Clerk and Recorder, or the County Assessor. NOTE: Pursuant to CRS 10-11-123, notice is hereby given: This notice applies to owner’s policy commitments containing a mineral severance instrument exception, or exceptions, in Schedule B, Section 2. A. That there is recorded evidence that a mineral estate has been severed, leased, or otherwise conveyed from the surface estate and that there is a substantial likelihood that a third party holds some or all interest in oil, gas, other minerals, or geothermal energy in the property; and B. That such mineral estate may include the right to enter and use the property without the surface owner’s permission. NOTE: Pursuant to Colorado Division of Insurance Regulations 8-1-2, Affirmative mechanic’s lien protection for the Owner may be available (typically by deletion of Exception no. 4 of Schedule B, Section 2 of the Commitment from the Owner’s Policy to be issued) upon compliance with the following conditions: A. The land described in Schedule A of this commitment must be a single family residence which includes a condominium or townhouse unit. B. No labor or materials have been furnished by mechanics or material-men for purposes of construction on the land described in Schedule A of this Commitment within the past 6 months. C. The Company must receive an appropriate affidavit indemnifying the Company against un-filed mechanic’s and material-men’s liens. D. The Company must receive payment of the appropriate premium. E. If there has been construction, improvements or major repairs undertaken on the property to be purchased within six months prior to the Date of the Commitment, the requirements to obtain coverage for unrecorded liens will include: disclosure of certain construction information; financial information as to the seller, the builder and or the contractor; payment of the appropriate premium, fully executed Indemnity Agreements satisfactory to the company, and, any additional requirements as may be necessary after an examination of the aforesaid information by the Company. No coverage will be given under any circumstances for labor or material for which the insured has contracted for or agreed to pay. 198 Form 50-CO-Disclosure (4-1-16)Page 12 of 16 Disclosure Statement (5-1-15) Colorado NOTE: Pursuant to C.R.S. 38-35-125(2) no person or entity that provides closing and settlement services for a real estate transaction shall disburse funds as a part of such services until those funds have been received and are available for immediate withdrawal as a matter of right. NOTE: C.R.S. 39-14-102 requires that a real property transfer declaration accompany any conveyance document presented for recordation in the State of Colorado. Said declaration shall be completed and signed by either the grantor or grantee. NOTE: Pursuant to CRS 10-1-128(6)(a), It is unlawful to knowingly provide false, incomplete, or misleading facts or information to an insurance company for the purpose of defrauding or attempting to defraud the company. Penalties may include imprisonment, fines, denial of insurance and civil damages. Any insurance company or agent of an insurance company who knowingly provides false, incomplete, or misleading facts or information to a policyholder or claimant for the purpose of defrauding or attempting to defraud the policyholder or claimant with regard to a settlement or award payable from insurance proceeds shall be reported to the Colorado division of insurance within the department of regulatory agencies. NOTE: Pursuant to Colorado Division of Insurance Regulations 8-1-3, notice is hereby given of the availability of an ALTA Closing Protection Letter which may, upon request, be provided to certain parties to the transaction identified in the commitment. Nothing herein contained will be deemed to obligate the company to provide any of the coverages referred to herein unless the above conditions are fully satisfied. 199 TELEPHONE 970 925-7328 FACSIMILE 970 925-7348 ATTORNEYS TITLE INSURANCE AGENCY OF ASPEN, LLC 715 West Main Street, Suite 202 Aspen, CO 81611 Attorneys Title Insurance Agency of Aspen, LLC Privacy Policy Notice PURPOSE OF THIS NOTICE Title V. of the Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act (GLBA) generally prohibits any financial institution, directly or through it affiliates, from sharing non-public personal information about you with a nonaffiliated third party unless the institution provides you with a notice of its privacy policies and practices, such as the type of information that it collects about you and the categories of persons or entities to whom it may be disclosed. In compliance with the GLBA, we are providing you with this document, which notifies you of the privacy policies and practices of Attorneys Title Insurance Agency of Aspen, LLC. We may collect nonpublic personal information about you from the following sources: Information we receive from you, such as on application or other forms. Information about your transactions we secure from out files, or from our affiliates or others. Information we receive from a consumer reporting agency. Information that we receive from others involved in your transaction, such as the real estate agent or lender. Unless it is specifically stated otherwise in an amended Privacy Policy Notice, no additional nonpublic personal information will be collected about you. We may disclose any of the above information that we collect about our customers or former customer to our affiliates or to nonaffiliated third parties as permitted by law. We also may disclose this information about our customers or former customers to the following types of nonaffiliated companies that perform marketing services on our behalf or with whom we have joint marketing agreements: Financial service providers such as companies engaged in banking, consumer finance, securities and insurance. Non-financial companies such as envelope stuffers and other fulfillment service providers. WE DO NOT DISCLOSE ANY NONPUBLIC PERSONAL INFORMATION ABOUT YOU WITH ANYONE FOR ANY PURPOSE THAT IS NOT SPECIFICALLY PERMITTED BY LAW. We restrict access to nonpublic personal information about you to those employees who need to know that information in order to provide products or services to you. We maintain physical, electronic, and procedural safeguards that comply with federal regulations to guard your nonpublic personal information. 200 201 202 203 204 135 W. FRANCIS STREET, ASPEN CO VICINITY MAP 135 W. FRANCIS STREET PARCEL: 273512421001 LEGAL DESCRIPTION: Subdivision: Subdivision: CITY AND TOWNSITE OF ASPEN Block: 56 Lot A AND: - Lot: W 1/2 OF LOT B VICINIT Y MAP 205 Francis Street Holdings, LLC 135 W Francis Street Aspen, CO 81611 February 9, 2023 To Whom It May Concern: This letter authorizes Kim Raymond and her team of architects at Kim Raymond Architecture + Interiors to represent Francis Street Holdings, LLC through the Land Use Process review for “No Negative Effect” application and permitting process. Mark DiPaola is the manager of the LLC; his number is 310=.869-5442 and email; mark@d3ventures.com Kim can be found at 501 E Hyman Ave, Suite 205, Aspen, CO 81611. The office number is 970- 925-2252. kim@krai.us. Thank you for your consideration of this matter. Respectfully, Francis Street Holdings, LLC by Mark DiPaola, manager 206 501 E. Hyman Ave, Suite 201 | Aspen, Colorado | 81611 | 970.925.2252 July 31, 2023 Kirsten Armstrong Stuart Hayden Historic Preservation Officer City of Aspen Community Development Department Aspen, CO 81611 RE: 135 W. Francis Street. Minor Development and Relocation Application Parcel ID: 273512421001 Dear Kirsten and Stuart, Thank you for your assistance in this process. We have assembled all the documents required in the pre-application summary letter. We do appreciate that we have already been granted the Certificate for No Negative Effect for the new window well on the southwest corner of the home, adjacent to the more modern addition. This application is for Minor Development and Relocation. Once the owner sat with the drawings for the finishing of the existing basement and digging out some space for new mechanical equipment, he started thinking that it would be better for his family’s use to just keep digging and claim more of the area under the home for basement living space. This application is seeking approval for the following: 1. Dig a larger and deeper basement for living space under the historic home 2. The acrylic shades on the south side will remain, no change. See all elevations. 3. The house was recently painted, as the owner could not wait until all the permitting process was behind him to do this. 4. The plexiglass roof over the exterior stairs is existing and the owner would like to keep it as weather protection over the stairs. An updated railing will be added as fall protection around this feature. The new window wells will have similar railings around them as shown on the elevations. 5. No other work will be done on the historic portion of the home. The rest of the work on the exterior will be maintenance. There will be work on the interior existing home as well, but that is not the concern of the HPC. 207 501 E. Hyman Ave, Suite 201 | Aspen, Colorado | 81611 | 970.925.2252 RELEVANT LAND USE CODE SECTIONS SECTION 26.304 1. Please see attached letter of authorization from Mark DiPaola, the manager of Francis Street Holdings, LLC; granting Kim Raymond Architecture + Interiors, authority to act on their behalf throughout this process. 2. Please see the attached Vicinity Map with a legal description and directions to the property. 3. Please see the attached Title Insurance, Schedule A & B for proof of ownership. 4. Please see attached Site Plan 5. Please see the current survey of the property located at 135 W. Francis St. 6. Please also find attached all the forms for this Land Use Application. 7. Please see below, the description and summary of the proposed work to be done. Additionally, please find a copy of the Pre-application Conference Summary sheet, attached at the end of this packet of information. This application package includes all requested documents as outlined by Kirsten Armstrong in the email dated 5/11/23. SECTION 26.410 RESIDENTIAL DESIGN STANDARDS In reviewing this section, there are no standards that need to be addressed by any of work we are proposing. There is no work that will affect the connection to the street, the perception to the neighbors or the neighborhood and the building scale is not changing. All work that is not maintenance is below grade or repairing windows. SECTION 26.415.070.C HISTORIC PRESERVATION – MINOR DEVELOPMENT C.1.c The proposed work falls outside the arena for a Certificate of No Negative Effect due to the under pinning and digging under the historic home. Following is a summary of the proposed work: There is an existing unfinished basement, that the owner would like to incorporate into his usable living space. In the first design option, we had hoped to incorporate just the existing foundation and add the one window well. Unfortunately, the placement of the needed stairs to access this new basement ruined the family’s favorite room in the house. We researched new locations for the stairs that would function with the layout of the historic home, the more modern addition and the new basement, while making the best use of space in all these areas. To accomplish this, we realized that the new stairs needed to descend into the basement through the historic home; and to do this, we had to dig out from under more of the historic home. We will not be extending the proposed 208 501 E. Hyman Ave, Suite 201 | Aspen, Colorado | 81611 | 970.925.2252 basement as far as the front of the historic home, but we will follow the footprint of the historic home. For this expanded basement an additional window well on the east side of the building is needed. It will have no negative effect on the significance of the historic home or the architectural character of the property or neighborhood. This window well is proposed to be over 23’ behind the front façade of the historic home; 28’ if you start counting from the entry porch. In fact, the proposed window well will be behind the existing fence that the owner intends to keep, making it not visible from the street. The window well will have an operable grate for egress, thus eliminating the need for a 36” railing around the opening. It will be 1’-7” outside the setback on the east side, so will be only 36” square, clear space on the inside. 26.415.070.C.2.a-e Please see attached for all requirements of Section 26.304. Also, see attached scaled floor plans, site plan and elevations that depict accurately the building materials; and photographs of the existing home. There will be no changes to the exterior materials. See above for a statement regarding the RDS. 26.415.070.C.3 The pre-application letter states that there will be no neighborhood outreach. 26.415.090 RELOCATION OF DESIGNATED HISTORIC PROPERTIES This home is not actually being relocated, it is not even being picked up. We are proposing to dig under the existing home to build a new foundation and basement under it while leaving it in place. There is already a full basement under the more modern addition of this home. We are proposing extending this basement under the historic resource and providing a new concrete foundation. This new basement will help stabilize the home which is still perched on it’s historic foundation. The existing basement is only accessible from the outside at this point, and we are proposing making it accessible from the interior. We have done this on a number of historic and non-historic homes in town and have utilized a strategy that is very stable by supporting the existing building and removing small sections of dirt and old foundation at a time as we move around the perimeter of the existing foundation; replacing it with new concrete walls. We will start by cutting access into the existing crawlspace under the home through the unfinished basement. The dirt that is in the center of the home will be dug out a little bit at a time to give the workers space to maneuver; leaving the integrity of the existing soil in place as much as possible. Sections of dirt, 3-4’ wide will be removed after bracing the floor above each section. Temporary structural columns will be employed to support the building. The structural engineer will prepare a stamped set of plans to outline in detail the exact process for our building permit application. 209 501 E. Hyman Ave, Suite 201 | Aspen, Colorado | 81611 | 970.925.2252 The rest of this section does not apply as we are not moving the home. 26.415.110. Historic Preservation – Benefits This project is not seeking any variations or benefits from the HPC. 26.575.020 CALCULATIONS AND MEASUREMENTS Please see attached FAR calculations 26.710.040 MEDIUM DENSITY RESIDENTIAL R-6 There will be no changes in use, height above grade or floor area above grade; the basement will increase in size as noted on the FAR calculations. The building footprint will adjust with the proposed new window wells and the southwest corner of the basement. The only zoning related changes are how the additional sub grade space will affect the FAR calculations. See above. SUMMARY The existing historic home had a substantial addition constructed in the 1980s. This addition was built over a full depth basement which was accessed through an exterior stairwell, and never finished. Our previous application proposed adding a circular stair to access this basement and to add a window well on the SW corner of the building; this was given approval on March 27,2023 in the form of a Certificate of No Negative Effect. At this time, as we are proposing a larger basement, we are in need of an additional window well on the east side of the home. As for the Historic guidelines, we are not proposing any exterior changes or alterations to the existing building beyond the addition of the subgrade window wells. The historic home will receive the care and maintenance needed and has already received a fresh coat of paint. We are not asking for any variances or a bonus; just the Certificate of Appropriateness for a Minor Development so we can submit our building permit application. Thank you for the time and consideration and approval of this application. We are excited to keep our momentum and submit the permit application so as to begin construction on the remodel of the home for this family. Respectfully yours, Kim Raymond Kim Raymond Kim Raymond Architecture + Interiors 210 DEVELOPMENT ORDER of the City of Aspen Community Development Department This Development Order, hereinafter “Order”, is hereby issued pursuant to Section 26.304.080, “Development Orders”, and Section 26.308.010, “Vested Property Rights”, of the City of Aspen Municipal Code. This Order allows development of a site-specific development plan pursuant to the provisions of the land use approvals, described herein. The effective date of this Order shall also be the initiation date of a three-year vested property right. The vested property right shall expire on the day after the third anniversary of the effective date of this Order, unless a building permit application submittal is accepted and deemed complete by the Chief Building Official, pursuant to Section 26.304.090, or unless an exemption, extension, reinstatement, or a revocation is issued by City Council pursuant to Section 26.308.010. After Expiration of vested property rights, this Order shall remain in full force and effect, excluding any growth management allotments granted pursuant to Section 26.470, but shall be subject to any amendments to the Land Use Code adopted since the effective date of this Order. This Development Order is associated with the property noted below for the site specific development plan as described below. Mark DiPaola, 135 W. Francis Street, Aspen CO, 81611. Property Owner’s Name, Mailing Address 135 W. Francis Street; Legally described as Lot A and the West ½ of Lot B, Block 56, City and Townsite of Aspen, Pitkin County, Colorado, Parcel ID: 2735-124-21-001. Legal Description and Street Address of Subject Property Administrative approval was granted for work related to lightwells and in-kind non-historic window replacement. Written Description of the Site Specific Plan and/or Attachment Describing Plan A Certificate of No Negative Effect was completed on March 27, 2023. Land Use Approval(s) Received and Dates (Attach Final Ordinances or Resolutions) April 6, 2023 Effective Date of Development Order (Same as date of publication of notice of approval.) April 6, 2026 Expiration Date of Development Order (The extension, reinstatement, exemption from expiration and revocation may be pursued in accordance with Section 26.308.010 of the City of Aspen Municipal Code.) Issued this 27th day of March, 2023, by the City of Aspen Community Development Director. ____________________________________________________ Phillip Supino, Community Development Director Planning Director, for 211 Scale: AS NOTED ISSUE SCHEMATIC DESIGN 1" ACTUAL IF THE ABOVE DIMENSION DOES NOT MEASURE ONE INCH (1") EXACTLY, THIS DRAWING WILL HAVE BEEN ENLARGED OR REDUCED, AFFECTING ALL LABELED SCALES. ALL DESIGNS, IDEAS ARRANGEMENTS A N D P L A N S I N D I C AT E D B Y T H E S E DRAWINGS AND SPECIFICATIONS ARE THE PROPERTY AND COPYRIGHT OF KIM R AY M O ND AR C H I T E C TS, I N C. A N D SHALL NEITHER BE USED ON ANY OTHER WORK NOR BE USED BY ANY OTHER PERSON FOR ANY USE WHATSOEVER W I T H O U T W R I T T E N P E R M I S S I O N . W R I T T E N D I ME N SI O NS S H A L L TA KE P R E C E D E N C E O V E R S C A L E D DIMENSIONS AND SHALL BE VERIFIED AT T H E S I T E . A N Y D I M E N S I O N A L DISCREPANCY SHALL BE BROUGHT TO THE ATTENTION OF THE ARCHITECT PRIOR TO COMMENCEMENT OF WORK. Z.0.07 7/6/23 EXISTING FAR CALCUL ATIONS DATE www.kimraymondarchitects.com 970-925-2252DI PAOLA RESIDENCE135 W. FRANCIS ST.ASPEN, COLORADO 8161104/14/232A 3.12A 3.12 A 3.1 EXISTINGAREAEXISTINGAREA2 A 3.1 602 sq ft (unfinished crawl space) RG FRGF WDR2A 3.12A 3.12 A 3.1 2 A 3.1 1,612 sq ft 122 sq ft 153 sq ft 2A 3.12A 3.12 A 3.1 2 A 3.1 MASTER BEDROOM BEDROOM HALL BATH OPEN TO BELOW LOFT 5' SETBACK LINE 10' SETBACK LINE PROPERTY LINE 518 sq ft 130 sq ft SCALE: 3/16" = 1'-0"1 EXISTING LOWER LEVEL FAR SCALE: 3/16" = 1'-0"2 EXISTING MAIN LEVEL FAR SCALE: 3/16" = 1'-0"3 EXISTING UPPER LEVEL FAR 212 Scale: AS NOTED ISSUE SCHEMATIC DESIGN 1" ACTUAL IF THE ABOVE DIMENSION DOES NOT MEASURE ONE INCH (1") EXACTLY, THIS DRAWING WILL HAVE BEEN ENLARGED OR REDUCED, AFFECTING ALL LABELED SCALES. ALL DESIGNS, IDEAS ARRANGEMENTS A N D P L A N S I N D I C AT E D B Y T H E S E DRAWINGS AND SPECIFICATIONS ARE THE PROPERTY AND COPYRIGHT OF KIM R AY M O ND AR C H I T E C TS, I N C. A N D SHALL NEITHER BE USED ON ANY OTHER WORK NOR BE USED BY ANY OTHER PERSON FOR ANY USE WHATSOEVER W I T H O U T W R I T T E N P E R M I S S I O N . W R I T T E N D I ME N SI O NS S H A L L TA KE P R E C E D E N C E O V E R S C A L E D DIMENSIONS AND SHALL BE VERIFIED AT T H E S I T E . A N Y D I M E N S I O N A L DISCREPANCY SHALL BE BROUGHT TO THE ATTENTION OF THE ARCHITECT PRIOR TO COMMENCEMENT OF WORK. Z.0.08 7/6/23 PROPOSED FAR CALCUL ATIONS DATE www.kimraymondarchitects.com 970-925-2252DI PAOLA RESIDENCE135 W. FRANCIS ST.ASPEN, COLORADO 8161104/14/23 WDRRG F2A 3.12A 3.12 A 3.1 2 A 3.1 1,593 sq ft 121 sq ft 153 sq ft 2A 3.12A 3.12 A 3.1 2 A 3.1 129 sq ft 517 sq ft2A 3.12A 3.12 A 3.1 2 3 4 5 4 6 4 1 2 A 3.1 1,383 sq ft SCALE: 3/16" = 1'-0"2 PROPOSED MAIN LEVEL FAR SCALE: 3/16" = 1'-0"3 PROPOSED UPPER LEVEL FAR SCALE: 3/16" = 1'-0"1 PROPOSED LOWER LEVEL FAR 213 Scale: AS NOTED ISSUE SCHEMATIC DESIGNDI PAOLA RESIDENCE135 W. FRANCIS ST.ASPEN, COLORADO 816111" ACTUAL IF THE ABOVE DIMENSION DOES NOT MEASURE ONE INCH (1") EXACTLY, THIS DRAWING WILL HAVE BEEN ENLARGED OR REDUCED, AFFECTING ALL LABELED SCALES. ALL DESIGNS, IDEAS ARRANGEMENTS A N D P L A N S I N D I C AT E D B Y T H E S E DRAWINGS AND SPECIFICATIONS ARE THE PROPERTY AND COPYRIGHT OF KIM R AY M O ND AR C H I T E C TS, I N C. A N D SHALL NEITHER BE USED ON ANY OTHER WORK NOR BE USED BY ANY OTHER PERSON FOR ANY USE WHATSOEVER W I T H O U T W R I T T E N P E R M I S S I O N . W R I T T E N D I ME N SI O NS S H A L L TA KE P R E C E D E N C E O V E R S C A L E D DIMENSIONS AND SHALL BE VERIFIED AT T H E S I T E . A N Y D I M E N S I O N A L DISCREPANCY SHALL BE BROUGHT TO THE ATTENTION OF THE ARCHITECT PRIOR TO COMMENCEMENT OF WORK. Z.0.09 7/6/23 PROPOSED FAR C ALCUL ATIO NS DATE 04/14/23 www.kimraymondarchitects.com 970-925-2252PRINTED ON: 4 3 25 215 sq ft 42 sq ft 36 sq ft 8'-2"1. 7. D C BE 399 sq ft8'-2"2. 17 sq ft 2 3 4 5 229 sq ft 25 sq ft 3. 5. B C D E 399 sq ft4.77 sq ft 27 sq ft SCALE: 1/8" = 1'-0"1 FAR ELEVATION - NORTH SCALE: 1/8" = 1'-0"2 FAR ELEVATION - EAST SCALE: 1/8" = 1'-0"3 FAR ELEVATION - SOUTH SCALE: 1/8" = 1'-0"4 FAR ELEVATION - WEST 214 Scale: AS NOTED ISSUE SCHEMATIC DESIGNDI PAOLA RESIDENCE135 W. FRANCIS ST.ASPEN, COLORADO 816111" ACTUAL IF THE ABOVE DIMENSION DOES NOT MEASURE ONE INCH (1") EXACTLY, THIS DRAWING WILL HAVE BEEN ENLARGED OR REDUCED, AFFECTING ALL LABELED SCALES. ALL DESIGNS, IDEAS ARRANGEMENTS A N D P L A N S I N D I C AT E D B Y T H E S E DRAWINGS AND SPECIFICATIONS ARE THE PROPERTY AND COPYRIGHT OF KIM R AY M O ND AR C H I T E C TS, I N C. A N D SHALL NEITHER BE USED ON ANY OTHER WORK NOR BE USED BY ANY OTHER PERSON FOR ANY USE WHATSOEVER W I T H O U T W R I T T E N P E R M I S S I O N . W R I T T E N D I ME N SI O NS S H A L L TA KE P R E C E D E N C E O V E R S C A L E D DIMENSIONS AND SHALL BE VERIFIED AT T H E S I T E . A N Y D I M E N S I O N A L DISCREPANCY SHALL BE BROUGHT TO THE ATTENTION OF THE ARCHITECT PRIOR TO COMMENCEMENT OF WORK. HPC 00 7/6/23 SITE PL AN DATE 04/14/23 www.kimraymondarchitects.com 970-925-2252PRINTED ON: 1 2 3 4 5 6 B B E E C C A A E1 E1 7'-2"14'-4"1° EXISTING WOOD PATIO ON GRADE TO REMAIN PROPERTY LINEGRAVEL PARKING WEST FRANCIS STREET 74.72 ROW EDGE OF PAVEMENT NORTH 1ST STREET75.45 ROWEDGE OF PAVEMENT5' SETBACK LINE 10' SETBACK LINE 1 2 3 4 5 6 B B C C E E D D A A E1 E1 7'-2"14'-4"8"3'-1 1/2"8"3'-5"8"8"3'-2"8"1° PREVIOUSLY APPROVED WINDOW WELL 3.27.23 EXISTING WOOD PATIO ON GRADE TO REMAIN PROPOSED WINDOW WELL EXISTING FENCE TO REMAIN PROPERTY LINEGRAVEL PARKING WEST FRANCIS STREET 74.72 ROW EDGE OF PAVEMENT NORTH 1ST STREET75.45 ROWEDGE OF PAVEMENT5' SETBACK LINE 10' SETBACK LINE SCALE: 1/8" = 1'-0"1 SITE PLAN EXISTING SCALE: 1/8" = 1'-0"2 SITE PLAN PROPOSED 215 501 E. Hyman Ave. Suite 205- Aspen, CO 81611 www.kimraymondarchitects.com AUGUST 1ST , 2023 135 W. FRANCIS ST. BASEMENT REMODEL 216 EXISTING: NORTH SIDE YEAR: 2023 HISTORIC REFERENCE 135 W. FRANCIS STREET, ASPEN CO 217 EXISTING: WEST SIDE YEAR 2023 HISTORIC REFERENCE 135 W. FRANCIS STREET, ASPEN CO 218 SITE PLAN 135 W. FRANCIS STREET, ASPEN CO PROPOSED EXISTING SITE PLANS Scale: AS NOTED ISSUE SCHEMATIC DESIGNDI PAOLA RESIDENCE135 W. FRANCIS ST.ASPEN, COLORADO 816111" ACTUAL IF THE ABOVE DIMENSION DOES NOT MEASURE ONE INCH (1") EXACTLY, THIS DRAWING WILL HAVE BEEN ENLARGED OR REDUCED, AFFECTING ALL LABELED SCALES. ALL DESIGNS, IDEAS ARRANGEMENTS AND PLANS INDICATED BY THESE DRAWINGS AND SPECIFICATIONS ARE THE PROPERTY AND COPYRIGHT OF KIM RAYMOND ARCHITECTS, INC. AND SHALL NEITHER BE USED ON ANY OTHER WORK NOR BE USED BY ANY OTHER PERSON FOR ANY USE WHATSOEVER WITHOUT WRITTEN PERMISSION. WRITTEN DIMENSIONS SHALL TAKE P R E C E D E N C E O V E R S C A L E D DIMENSIONS AND SHALL BE VERIFIED AT T H E S I TE . A NY D I M E N S I ON A L DISCREPANCY SHALL BE BROUGHT TO THE ATTENTION OF THE ARCHITECT PRIOR TO COMMENCEMENT OF WORK. HPC.00 7/31/23 SITE PLAN DATE 04/14/23 www.kimraymondarchitects.com 970-925-2252PRINTED ON: 1 2 3 4 A A B B D D C C 5 E E 2 A 3.1 2A 3.12A 3.12 A 3.4 PROPERTY LINE 7886 7887 7888 1 2 3 4 A A B B D D C C 5 E E 2 A 3.1 2A 3.12A 3.12 A 3.4 PROPERTY LINE 7886 7887 7888 SCALE: 1/8" = 1'-0"1 SITE PLAN EXISTING SCALE: 1/8" = 1'-0"1 SITE PLAN PROPOSED 219 LOWER LEVEL 135 W. FRANCIS STREET, ASPEN CO PROPOSED EXISTING FLOOR PLANS Scale: AS NOTED ISSUE SCHEMATIC DESIGNDI PAOLA RESIDENCE135 W. FRANCIS ST.ASPEN, COLORADO 816111" ACTUAL IF THE ABOVE DIMENSION DOES NOT MEASURE ONE INCH (1") EXACTLY, THIS DRAWING WILL HAVE BEEN ENLARGED OR REDUCED, AFFECTING ALL LABELED SCALES. ALL DESIGNS, IDEAS ARRANGEMENTS AND PLANS INDICATED BY THESE DRAWINGS AND SPECIFICATIONS ARE THE PROPERTY AND COPYRIGHT OF KIM RAYMOND ARCHITECTS, INC. AND SHALL NEITHER BE USED ON ANY OTHER WORK NOR BE USED BY ANY OTHER PERSON FOR ANY USE WHATSOEVER WITHOUT WRITTEN PERMISSION. WRITTEN DIMENSIONS SHALL TAKE P R E C E D E N C E O V E R S C A L E D DIMENSIONS AND SHALL BE VERIFIED AT T H E S I T E. A N Y D IM E N S I O NA L DISCREPANCY SHALL BE BROUGHT TO THE ATTENTION OF THE ARCHITECT PRIOR TO COMMENCEMENT OF WORK. HPC.01 7/31/23 LOWER LEVEL DATE 04/14/23 www.kimraymondarchitects.com 970-925-2252PRINTED ON: 1 2 3 4 A A B B D D C C 5 E E 2 A 3.1 2A 3.12A 3.1UNFINISHED BASEMENT EXISTINGAREAEXISTINGAREA2 A 3.4 1 2 3 4 A A B B D D C C 5 E E 5'-7 3/8"5'-3 3/8"4'-0"12'-3"5'-9"6'-0"85'-0"35'-0"10"4'-9"10"3'-9 3/4" 3 1/2" 45'-0" 6'-6 5/8" 18'-4 1/8" 5 1/2" 7'-8 1/4" 3 1/2" 6" 28'-0 7/8" 6"6"3 1/2"10'-4 5/8"5 1/2"4'-9 1/4"5 1/2"6'-1 3/8"5 1/2"10'-0 1/8"5 1/2"13'-11 3/4"3 1/2"8"8" 3 1/2" 17'-8" 3 1/2" 8'-1 1/2" 3 1/2" 8"6"3 1/2"11'-4 1/2"5 1/2"9 1/2" 3'-4 1/2"9 1/2"3'-11 7/8"3'-9"14'-1 1/8" 5 1/2" 3'-9 1/2"7'-8 1/4" 5 1/2"4'-8"7'-3 1/4"10"3'-0"10"8'-6 1/2"5 1/2"5'-6"5 1/2"18'-5 7/8"3 1/2"2 A 3.1 2A 3.12A 3.1BEDROOM 5 BEDROOM 6 PLAYROOM 001 003 004 BATHROOM 002 MECH. WINDOW WELL EXISTING WINDOW WELL UP WINDOW WELL CLOSETCLOSETCLST.BEDROOM 4 004 002 BATHROOM STORAGE EXISTINGAREAPROPOSEDAREAEXISTINGAREAPROPOSEDAREA2 A 3.4 SCALE: 3/16" = 1'-0"1 LOWER LEVEL: EXISTING SCALE: 3/16" = 1'-0"2 LOWER LEVEL: PROPOSED 220 MAIN LEVEL 135 W. FRANCIS STREET, ASPEN CO PROPOSED EXISTING FLOOR PLANS Scale: AS NOTED ISSUE SCHEMATIC DESIGNDI PAOLA RESIDENCE135 W. FRANCIS ST.ASPEN, COLORADO 816111" ACTUAL IF THE ABOVE DIMENSION DOES NOT MEASURE ONE INCH (1") EXACTLY, THIS DRAWING WILL HAVE BEEN ENLARGED OR REDUCED, AFFECTING ALL LABELED SCALES. ALL DESIGNS, IDEAS ARRANGEMENTS AND PLANS INDICATED BY THESE DRAWINGS AND SPECIFICATIONS ARE THE PROPERTY AND COPYRIGHT OF KIM RAYMOND ARCHITECTS, INC. AND SHALL NEITHER BE USED ON ANY OTHER WORK NOR BE USED BY ANY OTHER PERSON FOR ANY USE WHATSOEVER WITHOUT WRITTEN PERMISSION. WRITTEN DIMENSIONS SHALL TAKE P R E C E D E N C E O V E R S C A L E D DIMENSIONS AND SHALL BE VERIFIED AT T H E SI T E . AN Y D I M E NSI ON A L DISCREPANCY SHALL BE BROUGHT TO THE ATTENTION OF THE ARCHITECT PRIOR TO COMMENCEMENT OF WORK. HPC.02 7/31/23 MAIN LEVEL DATE 04/14/23 www.kimraymondarchitects.com 970-925-2252PRINTED ON: RG FRGF WDR1 2 3 4 A A B B D D C C 5 E E 2 A 3.1 2A 3.12A 3.1T.O.PLY 100'-0" T.F.F 100'-2 1/4" (site: 7887.51') 2 A 3.4 ENTRY ENTRY PORCH PROPERTY LINEDINING ROOM LIVING ROOM BEDROOM KITCHEN LAUNDRY BATHROOM KITCHEN LIVING/DINING BEDROOM BATHROOM 7886 7887 7 88 8 PROPERTY LINE DN UP WDR1 2 3 4 A A B B D D C C 5 E E RG F2 A 3.1 2A 3.12A 3.16'-0" 6 1/8" 5'-2 7/8"9'-0 7/8"25'-10 3/8"22'-11 5/8"25'-10 1/2"10'-0 1/2"5'-11 5/8"30'-0 3/4"1'-8 3/8"16'-5 5/8"4'-6 3/4"5 1/2"7'-3 1/2"5 1/2"10'-0 1/2"13'-9 3/4"3'-4 1/2"5 1/2"4'-0 3/8"20'-0 3/8"4'-0" 1'-11 7/8"3'-11 7/8"13'-6 1/8"5 1/2"5'-11 5/8"12'-3"4'-0"3'-0 1/8"5'-9" 2 A 3.4 ENTRY ENTRY PORCH PROPERTY LINE7886 7887 7 8 88 7 8 8 7 PROPERTY LINE BEDROOM LIVING BEDROOM 2 107 100 DEN OR LIVING 101 102 103 KITCHEN 105 BATH 1 104 BATH 2 108 FAMILY ROOM 106 LAUNDRY 109 CLOSET ENTRY 110 WINDOW WELL WINDOW WELL DN DN UP SCALE: 3/16" = 1'-0"1 MAIN LEVEL: EXISTING SCALE: 3/16" = 1'-0"2 MAIN LEVEL: PROPOSED 221 UPPER LEVEL 135 W. FRANCIS STREET, ASPEN CO PROPOSED EXISTING FLOOR PLANS Scale: AS NOTED ISSUE SCHEMATIC DESIGNDI PAOLA RESIDENCE135 W. FRANCIS ST.ASPEN, COLORADO 816111" ACTUAL IF THE ABOVE DIMENSION DOES NOT MEASURE ONE INCH (1") EXACTLY, THIS DRAWING WILL HAVE BEEN ENLARGED OR REDUCED, AFFECTING ALL LABELED SCALES. ALL DESIGNS, IDEAS ARRANGEMENTS AND PLANS INDICATED BY THESE DRAWINGS AND SPECIFICATIONS ARE THE PROPERTY AND COPYRIGHT OF KIM RAYMOND ARCHITECTS, INC. AND SHALL NEITHER BE USED ON ANY OTHER WORK NOR BE USED BY ANY OTHER PERSON FOR ANY USE WHATSOEVER WITHOUT WRITTEN PERMISSION. WRITTEN DIMENSIONS SHALL TAKE P R E C E D E N C E O V E R S C A L E D DIMENSIONS AND SHALL BE VERIFIED AT T HE S I T E. A NY D I M E N S I ON AL DISCREPANCY SHALL BE BROUGHT TO THE ATTENTION OF THE ARCHITECT PRIOR TO COMMENCEMENT OF WORK. HPC.03 7/31/23 UPPER LEVEL DATE 04/14/23 www.kimraymondarchitects.com 970-925-2252PRINTED ON: 1 2 3 4 A A B B D D C C 5 E E 2 A 3.1 2A 3.12A 3.12 A 3.4 MASTER BEDROOM BEDROOM HALL BATH OPEN TO BELOW LOFT PROPERTY LINE 1 2 3 4 A A B B D D C C 5 E E 2 A 3.1 2A 3.12A 3.12 A 3.4 5 1/2" 21'-7 3/4"5'-5 1/4"5 1/2"19'-8 3/4"5 1/2"4'-9 1/8"5 1/2"21'-1" 5 1/2" 5 1/2" 27'-1" 5 1/2"11'-10 7/8"5 1/2"3'-4"5 1/2"12'-4" 3 1/2" 8'-5 1/2"6'-0"5 1/2"14'-10 3/8"9'-1 3/4" 5 1/2"4'-10 1/4" 3 1/2" 13'-6 3/4"4'-7 3/4"3'-3 7/8"5 1/2" 2'-6 1/8"4'-0 3/4"22'-11 5/8"25'-10 1/2"10'-0 1/2"5'-11 5/8"19'-2 3/8"4'-0"12'-3"5'-9"6'-0"6'-6 5/8" MASTER BEDROOM BEDROOM 1 PROPERTY LINE 201 203 206 HALL 200 MASTER BATH 202 LOFT 204 (OPEN TO BELOW) SCALE: 3/16" = 1'-0"1 UPPER LEVEL: EXISTING SCALE: 3/16" = 1'-0"2 UPPER LEVEL: PROPOSED 222 ROOF PLAN FLOOR PLANS 135 W. FRANCIS STREET, ASPEN CO PROPOSED EXISTING Scale: AS NOTED ISSUE SCHEMATIC DESIGNDI PAOLA RESIDENCE135 W. FRANCIS ST.ASPEN, COLORADO 816111" ACTUAL IF THE ABOVE DIMENSION DOES NOT MEASURE ONE INCH (1") EXACTLY, THIS DRAWING WILL HAVE BEEN ENLARGED OR REDUCED, AFFECTING ALL LABELED SCALES. ALL DESIGNS, IDEAS ARRANGEMENTS AND PLANS INDICATED BY THESE DRAWINGS AND SPECIFICATIONS ARE THE PROPERTY AND COPYRIGHT OF KIM RAYMOND ARCHITECTS, INC. AND SHALL NEITHER BE USED ON ANY OTHER WORK NOR BE USED BY ANY OTHER PERSON FOR ANY USE WHATSOEVER WITHOUT WRITTEN PERMISSION. WRITTEN DIMENSIONS SHALL TAKE P R E C E D E N C E O V E R S C A L E D DIMENSIONS AND SHALL BE VERIFIED AT T H E S I T E. A NY D I M E N S I ON A L DISCREPANCY SHALL BE BROUGHT TO THE ATTENTION OF THE ARCHITECT PRIOR TO COMMENCEMENT OF WORK. HPC.04 7/31/23 ROOF PLAN DATE 04/14/23 www.kimraymondarchitects.com 970-925-2252PRINTED ON: 1 2 3 4 A A B B D D C C 5 E E 2 A 3.1 2A 3.12A 3.12 A 3.4 PROPERTY LINE 1 2 3 4 A A B B D D C C 5 E E 2 A 3.1 2A 3.12A 3.12 A 3.4 PROPERTY LINE SCALE: 3/16" = 1'-0"1 ROOF PLAN: EXISTING SCALE: 3/16" = 1'-0"2 ROOF PLAN: PROPOSED 223 NORTH ELEVATION: ELEVATIONS 135 W. FRANCIS STREET, ASPEN CO PROPOSED EXISTING Scale: AS NOTED ISSUE SCHEMATIC DESIGNDI PAOLA RESIDENCE135 W. FRANCIS ST.ASPEN, COLORADO 816111" ACTUAL IF THE ABOVE DIMENSION DOES NOT MEASURE ONE INCH (1") EXACTLY, THIS DRAWING WILL HAVE BEEN ENLARGED OR REDUCED, AFFECTING ALL LABELED SCALES. ALL DESIGNS, IDEAS ARRANGEMENTS AND PLANS INDICATED BY THESE DRAWINGS AND SPECIFICATIONS ARE THE PROPERTY AND COPYRIGHT OF KIM RAYMOND ARCHITECTS, INC. AND SHALL NEITHER BE USED ON ANY OTHER WORK NOR BE USED BY ANY OTHER PERSON FOR ANY USE WHATSOEVER WITHOUT WRITTEN PERMISSION. WRITTEN DIMENSIONS SHALL TAKE P R E C E D E N C E O V E R S C A L E D DIMENSIONS AND SHALL BE VERIFIED AT T H E S I T E . A N Y D I M E N S I O N A L DISCREPANCY SHALL BE BROUGHT TO THE ATTENTION OF THE ARCHITECT PRIOR TO COMMENCEMENT OF WORK. HPC 05 7/31/23 NORTH AND SOUTH ELEVATIONS DATE 04/14/23 www.kimraymondarchitects.com 970-925-2252PRINTED ON: 4 3 25 7886.00' 7886.61' EXISTING UNFINISHED BASEMENT (BEYOND HISTORIC HOUSE) T.O.PLY MAIN LEVEL 109' - 4 1/2" T.O.PLY MAIN LEVEL 109' - 4 1/2"PROPERTY LINE5' SETBACKPROPERTY LINE5' SETBACKT.O.PLY MAIN LEVEL 100' - 0" = 7887.32' T.O.FF MAIN LEVEL 100' - 2 1/4" = 7887.51' T.O.SLAB LOWER LEVEL 90' - 0" 4 3 25 9'-4 1/2"RAILING AT NEW WINDOW WELL BEYOND 7886.00'7886.33' EXISTING UNFINISHED BASEMENT (BEYOND HISTORIC HOUSE) NEW EGRESS WINDOW PROPOSED WINDOW WELL T.O.PLY MAIN LEVEL 100' - 0" T.O.PLY MAIN LEVEL 109' - 4 1/2" T.O.PLY MAIN LEVEL 109' - 4 1/2"PROPERTY LINE5' SETBACKPROPERTY LINE5' SETBACKT.O.PLY MAIN LEVEL 100' - 0" = 7887.32' T.O.FF MAIN LEVEL 100' - 2 1/4" 7887.00'7886.74'7886.73' 7887.31' EXISTING UNFINISHED BASEMENT T.O.PLY UPPER LEVEL 109' -4 1/2" T.O.PLY UPPER LEVEL 109' - 4 1/2"PROPERTY LINE5' SETBACKPROPERTY LINE5' SETBACKT.O.PLY MAIN LEVEL 100' - 0" = 7887.32' T.O.FF MAIN LEVEL 100' - 2 1/4" = 7887.51' T.O.SLAB LOWER LEVEL 90' - 0" 7887.00'7886.74'7886.73' 7887.31' EXISTING GRADE PROPOSED WINDOW WELL PROPOSED WINDOW WELL PROPOSED WINDOW WELL RAILING; STEEL NEWEL WITH HORIZONTAL STEEL PLATES PROPOSED WINDOW WELL RAILING; STEEL NEWEL WITH HORIZONTAL STEEL PLATES NO CHANGE TO THE WINDOWS BEYOND REPAIRING ANY BROKEN SEALS OR GLAZING EXISTING ACRYLIC AND WOOD "ROOF" TO REMAIN EXISTING UNFINISHED BASEMENT T.O.PLY MAIN LEVEL 99' - 0" T.O.PLY UPPER LEVEL 109' -4 1/2" T.O.PLY UPPER LEVEL 109' - 4 1/2"PROPERTY LINE5' SETBACKPROPERTY LINE5' SETBACKT.O.PLY MAIN LEVEL 100' - 0" = 7887.32' SCALE: 1/4" = 1'-0"1 EXISTING: NORTH ELEVATION SCALE: 1/4" = 1'-0"1 PROPOSED: NORTH ELEVATION SCALE: 1/4" = 1'-0"3 EXISTING: SOUTH ELEVATION SCALE: 1/4" = 1'-0"3 PROPOSED: SOUTH ELEVATION Scale: AS NOTED ISSUE SCHEMATIC DESIGNDI PAOLA RESIDENCE135 W. FRANCIS ST.ASPEN, COLORADO 816111" ACTUAL IF THE ABOVE DIMENSION DOES NOT MEASURE ONE INCH (1") EXACTLY, THIS DRAWING WILL HAVE BEEN ENLARGED OR REDUCED, AFFECTING ALL LABELED SCALES. ALL DESIGNS, IDEAS ARRANGEMENTS AND PLANS INDICATED BY THESE DRAWINGS AND SPECIFICATIONS ARE THE PROPERTY AND COPYRIGHT OF KIM RAYMOND ARCHITECTS, INC. AND SHALL NEITHER BE USED ON ANY OTHER WORK NOR BE USED BY ANY OTHER PERSON FOR ANY USE WHATSOEVER WITHOUT WRITTEN PERMISSION. WRITTEN DIMENSIONS SHALL TAKE P R E C E D E N C E O V E R S C A L E D DIMENSIONS AND SHALL BE VERIFIED AT T H E S I T E . A N Y D I M E N S I O N A L DISCREPANCY SHALL BE BROUGHT TO THE ATTENTION OF THE ARCHITECT PRIOR TO COMMENCEMENT OF WORK. HPC 05 7/31/23 NORTH AND SOUTH ELEVATIONS DATE 04/14/23 www.kimraymondarchitects.com 970-925-2252PRINTED ON: 4325 7886.00' 7886.61' EXISTING UNFINISHED BASEMENT (BEYOND HISTORIC HOUSE) T.O.PLY MAIN LEVEL 109' - 4 1/2" T.O.PLY MAIN LEVEL 109' - 4 1/2"PROPERTY LINE5' SETBACKPROPERTY LINE5' SETBACKT.O.PLY MAIN LEVEL 100' - 0" = 7887.32' T.O.FF MAIN LEVEL 100' - 2 1/4" = 7887.51' T.O.SLAB LOWER LEVEL 90' - 0" 4 3 25 9'-4 1/2"RAILING AT NEW WINDOW WELL BEYOND 7886.00'7886.33' EXISTING UNFINISHED BASEMENT (BEYOND HISTORIC HOUSE) NEW EGRESS WINDOW PROPOSED WINDOW WELL T.O.PLY MAIN LEVEL 100' - 0" T.O.PLY MAIN LEVEL 109' - 4 1/2" T.O.PLY MAIN LEVEL 109' - 4 1/2"PROPERTY LINE5' SETBACKPROPERTY LINE5' SETBACKT.O.PLY MAIN LEVEL 100' - 0" = 7887.32' T.O.FF MAIN LEVEL 100' - 2 1/4" 7887.00'7886.74'7886.73' 7887.31' EXISTING UNFINISHED BASEMENT T.O.PLY UPPER LEVEL 109' -4 1/2" T.O.PLY UPPER LEVEL 109' - 4 1/2"PROPERTY LINE5' SETBACKPROPERTY LINE5' SETBACKT.O.PLY MAIN LEVEL 100' - 0" = 7887.32' T.O.FF MAIN LEVEL 100' - 2 1/4" = 7887.51' T.O.SLAB LOWER LEVEL 90' - 0" 7887.00'7886.74'7886.73' 7887.31' EXISTING GRADE PROPOSED WINDOW WELL PROPOSED WINDOW WELL PROPOSED WINDOW WELL RAILING; STEEL NEWEL WITH HORIZONTAL STEEL PLATES PROPOSED WINDOW WELL RAILING; STEEL NEWEL WITH HORIZONTAL STEEL PLATES NO CHANGE TO THE WINDOWS BEYOND REPAIRING ANY BROKEN SEALS OR GLAZING EXISTING ACRYLIC AND WOOD "ROOF" TO REMAIN EXISTING UNFINISHED BASEMENT T.O.PLY MAIN LEVEL 99' - 0" T.O.PLY UPPER LEVEL 109' -4 1/2" T.O.PLY UPPER LEVEL 109' - 4 1/2"PROPERTY LINE5' SETBACKPROPERTY LINE5' SETBACKT.O.PLY MAIN LEVEL 100' - 0" = 7887.32' SCALE: 1/4" = 1'-0"1EXISTING: NORTH ELEVATION SCALE: 1/4" = 1'-0"1 PROPOSED: NORTH ELEVATION SCALE: 1/4" = 1'-0"3EXISTING: SOUTH ELEVATION SCALE: 1/4" = 1'-0"3 PROPOSED: SOUTH ELEVATION 224 SOUTH ELEVATION: ELEVATIONS 135 W. FRANCIS STREET, ASPEN CO PROPOSED EXISTING Scale: AS NOTED ISSUE SCHEMATIC DESIGNDI PAOLA RESIDENCE135 W. FRANCIS ST.ASPEN, COLORADO 816111" ACTUAL IF THE ABOVE DIMENSION DOES NOT MEASURE ONE INCH (1") EXACTLY, THIS DRAWING WILL HAVE BEEN ENLARGED OR REDUCED, AFFECTING ALL LABELED SCALES. ALL DESIGNS, IDEAS ARRANGEMENTSAND PLANS INDICATED BY THESEDRAWINGS AND SPECIFICATIONS ARETHE PROPERTY AND COPYRIGHT OF KIMRAYMOND ARCHITECTS, INC. ANDSHALL NEITHER BE USED ON ANY OTHERWORK NOR BE USED BY ANY OTHERPERSON FOR ANY USE WHATSOEVERWITHOUT WRITTEN PERMISSION.WRITTEN DIMENSIONS SHALL TAKE P R E C E D E N C E O V E R S C A L E D DIMENSIONS AND SHALL BE VERIFIED AT T H E S I T E . A N Y D I M E N S I O N A L DISCREPANCY SHALL BE BROUGHT TO THE ATTENTION OF THE ARCHITECT PRIOR TO COMMENCEMENT OF WORK. HPC 05 7/31/23 NORTH AND SOUTH ELEVATIONS DATE 04/14/23 www.kimraymondarchitects.com 970-925-2252PRINTED ON: 4 3 25 7886.00' 7886.61' EXISTING UNFINISHED BASEMENT (BEYOND HISTORIC HOUSE) T.O.PLY MAIN LEVEL109' - 4 1/2"T.O.PLY MAIN LEVEL109' - 4 1/2"PROPERTY LINE5' SETBACKPROPERTY LINE5' SETBACKT.O.PLY MAIN LEVEL 100' - 0" = 7887.32' T.O.FF MAIN LEVEL 100' - 2 1/4" = 7887.51' T.O.SLAB LOWER LEVEL 90' - 0" 4 3 25 9'-4 1/2"RAILING AT NEWWINDOW WELLBEYOND 7886.00'7886.33' EXISTING UNFINISHED BASEMENT (BEYOND HISTORIC HOUSE) NEW EGRESS WINDOW PROPOSED WINDOW WELL T.O.PLY MAIN LEVEL 100' - 0" T.O.PLY MAIN LEVEL109' - 4 1/2"T.O.PLY MAIN LEVEL109' - 4 1/2"PROPERTY LINE5' SETBACKPROPERTY LINE5' SETBACKT.O.PLY MAIN LEVEL 100' - 0" = 7887.32' T.O.FF MAIN LEVEL 100' - 2 1/4" 7887.00'7886.74'7886.73' 7887.31' EXISTING UNFINISHED BASEMENT T.O.PLY UPPER LEVEL 109' -4 1/2" T.O.PLY UPPER LEVEL 109' - 4 1/2"PROPERTY LINE5' SETBACKPROPERTY LINE5' SETBACKT.O.PLY MAIN LEVEL 100' - 0" = 7887.32' T.O.FF MAIN LEVEL 100' - 2 1/4" = 7887.51' T.O.SLAB LOWER LEVEL 90' - 0" 7887.00'7886.74'7886.73' 7887.31' EXISTING GRADE PROPOSED WINDOW WELL PROPOSED WINDOW WELL PROPOSED WINDOW WELL RAILING; STEEL NEWEL WITH HORIZONTAL STEEL PLATES PROPOSED WINDOW WELL RAILING; STEEL NEWEL WITH HORIZONTAL STEEL PLATES NO CHANGE TO THE WINDOWS BEYOND REPAIRING ANY BROKEN SEALS OR GLAZING EXISTING ACRYLIC AND WOOD "ROOF" TO REMAIN EXISTING UNFINISHED BASEMENT T.O.PLY MAIN LEVEL 99' - 0" T.O.PLY UPPER LEVEL 109' -4 1/2" T.O.PLY UPPER LEVEL 109' - 4 1/2"PROPERTY LINE5' SETBACKPROPERTY LINE5' SETBACKT.O.PLY MAIN LEVEL 100' - 0" = 7887.32' SCALE: 1/4" = 1'-0"1 EXISTING: NORTH ELEVATION SCALE: 1/4" = 1'-0"1 PROPOSED: NORTH ELEVATION SCALE: 1/4" = 1'-0"3 EXISTING: SOUTH ELEVATION SCALE: 1/4" = 1'-0"3 PROPOSED: SOUTH ELEVATION Scale: AS NOTED ISSUE SCHEMATIC DESIGNDI PAOLA RESIDENCE135 W. FRANCIS ST.ASPEN, COLORADO 816111" ACTUAL IF THE ABOVE DIMENSION DOES NOT MEASURE ONE INCH (1") EXACTLY, THIS DRAWING WILL HAVE BEEN ENLARGED OR REDUCED, AFFECTING ALL LABELED SCALES. ALL DESIGNS, IDEAS ARRANGEMENTSAND PLANS INDICATED BY THESEDRAWINGS AND SPECIFICATIONS ARETHE PROPERTY AND COPYRIGHT OF KIMRAYMOND ARCHITECTS, INC. ANDSHALL NEITHER BE USED ON ANY OTHERWORK NOR BE USED BY ANY OTHERPERSON FOR ANY USE WHATSOEVERWITHOUT WRITTEN PERMISSION. WRITTEN DIMENSIONS SHALL TAKE P R E C E D E N C E O V E R S C A L E D DIMENSIONS AND SHALL BE VERIFIED AT T H E S I T E . A N Y D I M E N S I O N A L DISCREPANCY SHALL BE BROUGHT TO THE ATTENTION OF THE ARCHITECT PRIOR TO COMMENCEMENT OF WORK. HPC 05 8/1/23 NORTH AND SOUTH ELEVATIONS DATE 04/14/23 www.kimraymondarchitects.com 970-925-2252PRINTED ON: 4325 7886.00' 7886.61' EXISTING UNFINISHED BASEMENT (BEYOND HISTORIC HOUSE) T.O.PLY MAIN LEVEL109' - 4 1/2"T.O.PLY MAIN LEVEL109' - 4 1/2"PROPERTY LINE5' SETBACKPROPERTY LINE5' SETBACKT.O.PLY MAIN LEVEL 100' - 0" = 7887.32' T.O.FF MAIN LEVEL 100' - 2 1/4" = 7887.51' T.O.SLAB LOWER LEVEL 90' - 0" 4 3 25 9'-4 1/2"RAILING AT NEWWINDOW WELLBEYOND 7886.00'7886.33' EXISTING UNFINISHED BASEMENT (BEYOND HISTORIC HOUSE) NEW EGRESS WINDOW PROPOSED WINDOW WELL T.O.PLY MAIN LEVEL 100' - 0" T.O.PLY MAIN LEVEL109' - 4 1/2"T.O.PLY MAIN LEVEL109' - 4 1/2"PROPERTY LINE5' SETBACKPROPERTY LINE5' SETBACKT.O.PLY MAIN LEVEL 100' - 0" = 7887.32' T.O.FF MAIN LEVEL 100' - 2 1/4" 7887.00'7886.74'7886.73' 7887.31' EXISTING ACRYLIC AND WOOD "ROOF" TO REMAIN EXISTING UNFINISHED BASEMENT EXISTING ACRYLIC AND WOOD "ROOF" TO REMAIN T.O.PLY UPPER LEVEL 109' -4 1/2" T.O.PLY UPPER LEVEL 109' - 4 1/2"PROPERTY LINE5' SETBACKPROPERTY LINE5' SETBACKT.O.PLY MAIN LEVEL 100' - 0" = 7887.32' T.O.FF MAIN LEVEL 100' - 2 1/4" = 7887.51' T.O.SLAB LOWER LEVEL 90' - 0" 7887.00'7886.74'7886.73' 7887.31' EXISTING GRADE PROPOSED WINDOW WELL PROPOSED WINDOW WELL PROPOSED WINDOW WELL RAILING; STEEL NEWEL WITH HORIZONTAL STEEL PLATES PROPOSED WINDOW WELL RAILING; STEEL NEWEL WITH HORIZONTAL STEEL PLATES EXISTING ACRYLIC AND WOOD "ROOF" TO REMAIN EXISTING UNFINISHED BASEMENT EXISTING ACRYLIC AND WOOD "ROOF" TO REMAIN T.O.PLY MAIN LEVEL 99' - 0" T.O.PLY UPPER LEVEL 109' -4 1/2" T.O.PLY UPPER LEVEL 109' - 4 1/2"PROPERTY LINE5' SETBACKPROPERTY LINE5' SETBACKT.O.PLY MAIN LEVEL 100' - 0" = 7887.32' SCALE: 1/4" = 1'-0"1EXISTING: NORTH ELEVATION SCALE: 1/4" = 1'-0"1 PROPOSED: NORTH ELEVATION SCALE: 1/4" = 1'-0"3EXISTING: SOUTH ELEVATION SCALE: 1/4" = 1'-0"3 PROPOSED: SOUTH ELEVATION 225 EAST ELEVATION: ELEVATIONS 135 W. FRANCIS STREET, ASPEN CO PROPOSED EXISTING Scale: AS NOTED ISSUE SCHEMATIC DESIGNDI PAOLA RESIDENCE135 W. FRANCIS ST.ASPEN, COLORADO 816111" ACTUAL IF THE ABOVE DIMENSION DOES NOT MEASURE ONE INCH (1") EXACTLY, THIS DRAWING WILL HAVE BEEN ENLARGED OR REDUCED, AFFECTING ALL LABELED SCALES. ALL DESIGNS, IDEAS ARRANGEMENTS AND PLANS INDICATED BY THESE DRAWINGS AND SPECIFICATIONS ARE THE PROPERTY AND COPYRIGHT OF KIM RAYMOND ARCHITECTS, INC. AND SHALL NEITHER BE USED ON ANY OTHER WORK NOR BE USED BY ANY OTHER PERSON FOR ANY USE WHATSOEVER WITHOUT WRITTEN PERMISSION. WRITTEN DIMENSIONS SHALL TAKE P R E C E D E N C E O V E R S C A L E D DIMENSIONS AND SHALL BE VERIFIED AT T HE S I T E . A N Y D I M EN S ION A L DISCREPANCY SHALL BE BROUGHT TO THE ATTENTION OF THE ARCHITECT PRIOR TO COMMENCEMENT OF WORK. HPC 06 7/31/23 EAST ELEVATION DATE 04/14/23 www.kimraymondarchitects.com 970-925-2252PRINTED ON: D C BE 7886.61'7886.63'7886.63'7886.80' 7887.82' EXISTING UNFINISHED BASEMENT T.O.PLY UPPER LEVEL 109' - 4 1/2"PROPERTY LINE10' SETBACKPROPERTY LINE10' SETBACKT.O.PLY MAIN LEVEL 100' - 0" = 7887.32' T.O.FF MAIN LEVEL 100' - 2 1/4" = 7887.51' T.O.SLAB LOWER LEVEL 90' - 0" D C BE EXISTING PORCH 7886.61'7886.63' 7886.63'7886.80' 7887.82' EXISTING GRADE REPAIR BROKEN WINDOWS; REPLACE GLAZING NEW SUB GRADE AREA PROPOSED RAILING AROUND NEW WINDOW WELL 2" STEEL NEWELS WITH 1/4" X 2" HORIZONTAL STEEL PLATE EXISTING ACRYLIC AND WOOD "ROOF" TO REMAIN EXISTING UNFINISHED BASEMENT T.O.PLY UPPER LEVEL 109' - 4 1/2" T.O.PLY MAIN LEVEL 90' - 0" T.O.PLY UPPER LEVEL 109' - 4 1/2" T.O.PLY MAIN LEVEL 100' - 0"PROPERTY LINE10' SETBACKPROPERTY LINE10' SETBACKT.O.PLY MAIN LEVEL 100' - 0" = 7887.32' T.O.FF MAIN LEVEL 100' - 2 1/4" T.O.PLY MAIN LEVEL 90' - 0" SCALE: 1/4" = 1'-0"2 EXISTING: EAST ELEVATION SCALE: 1/4" = 1'-0"2 PROPOSED: EAST ELEVATION Scale: AS NOTED ISSUE SCHEMATIC DESIGNDI PAOLA RESIDENCE135 W. FRANCIS ST.ASPEN, COLORADO 816111" ACTUAL IF THE ABOVE DIMENSION DOES NOT MEASURE ONE INCH (1") EXACTLY, THIS DRAWING WILL HAVE BEEN ENLARGED OR REDUCED, AFFECTING ALL LABELED SCALES. ALL DESIGNS, IDEAS ARRANGEMENTS AND PLANS INDICATED BY THESE DRAWINGS AND SPECIFICATIONS ARE THE PROPERTY AND COPYRIGHT OF KIM RAYMOND ARCHITECTS, INC. AND SHALL NEITHER BE USED ON ANY OTHER WORK NOR BE USED BY ANY OTHER PERSON FOR ANY USE WHATSOEVER WITHOUT WRITTEN PERMISSION. WRITTEN DIMENSIONS SHALL TAKE P R E C E D E N C E O V E R S C A L E D DIMENSIONS AND SHALL BE VERIFIED AT T H E S I T E . A N Y D I M EN SI O N A L DISCREPANCY SHALL BE BROUGHT TO THE ATTENTION OF THE ARCHITECT PRIOR TO COMMENCEMENT OF WORK. HPC 06 8/1/23 EAST ELEVATION DATE 04/14/23 www.kimraymondarchitects.com 970-925-2252PRINTED ON: D C BE 7886.61'7886.63'7886.63'7886.80' 7887.82' EXISTING UNFINISHED BASEMENT T.O.PLY UPPER LEVEL 109' - 4 1/2"PROPERTY LINE10' SETBACKPROPERTY LINE10' SETBACKT.O.PLY MAIN LEVEL 100' - 0" = 7887.32' T.O.FF MAIN LEVEL 100' - 2 1/4" = 7887.51' T.O.SLAB LOWER LEVEL 90' - 0" D C BE EXISTING PORCH 7886.61'7886.63' 7886.63'7886.80' 7887.82' EXISTING GRADE NEW SUB GRADE AREA PROPOSED RAILING AROUND NEW WINDOW WELL 2" STEEL NEWELS WITH 1/4" X 2" HORIZONTAL STEEL PLATE EXISTING ACRYLIC AND WOOD "ROOF" TO REMAIN EXISTING UNFINISHED BASEMENT T.O.PLY UPPER LEVEL 109' - 4 1/2" T.O.PLY MAIN LEVEL 90' - 0" T.O.PLY UPPER LEVEL 109' - 4 1/2" T.O.PLY MAIN LEVEL 100' - 0"PROPERTY LINE10' SETBACKPROPERTY LINE10' SETBACKT.O.PLY MAIN LEVEL 100' - 0" = 7887.32' T.O.FF MAIN LEVEL 100' - 2 1/4" T.O.PLY MAIN LEVEL 90' - 0" SCALE: 1/4" = 1'-0"2 EXISTING: EAST ELEVATION SCALE: 1/4" = 1'-0"2 PROPOSED: EAST ELEVATION 226 WEST ELEVATION: ELEVATIONS 135 W. FRANCIS STREET, ASPEN CO PROPOSED EXISTING Scale: AS NOTED ISSUE SCHEMATIC DESIGNDI PAOLA RESIDENCE135 W. FRANCIS ST.ASPEN, COLORADO 816111" ACTUAL IF THE ABOVE DIMENSION DOES NOT MEASURE ONE INCH (1") EXACTLY, THIS DRAWING WILL HAVE BEEN ENLARGED OR REDUCED, AFFECTING ALL LABELED SCALES. ALL DESIGNS, IDEAS ARRANGEMENTS AND PLANS INDICATED BY THESE DRAWINGS AND SPECIFICATIONS ARE THE PROPERTY AND COPYRIGHT OF KIM RAYMOND ARCHITECTS, INC. AND SHALL NEITHER BE USED ON ANY OTHER WORK NOR BE USED BY ANY OTHER PERSON FOR ANY USE WHATSOEVER WITHOUT WRITTEN PERMISSION. WRITTEN DIMENSIONS SHALL TAKE P R E C E D E N C E O V E R S C A L E D DIMENSIONS AND SHALL BE VERIFIED AT T H E S IT E . A N Y DI M E N S I O NA L DISCREPANCY SHALL BE BROUGHT TO THE ATTENTION OF THE ARCHITECT PRIOR TO COMMENCEMENT OF WORK. HPC 07 7/31/23 WEST ELEVATION DATE 04/14/23 www.kimraymondarchitects.com 970-925-2252PRINTED ON: B C D E 7886.00'7886.00' 7887.00' 7886.00' EXISTING UNFINISHED BASEMENT EXISTING EXTERIOR CONCRETE STAIRS TO REMAIN EXISTING SUBGRADE DOOR TO REMAIN T.O.PLY MAIN LEVEL 100' - 0" T.O.PLY UPPER LEVEL 109' - 4 1/2" T.O.PLY UPPER LEVEL 109' - 4 1/2"PROPERTY LINE10' SETBACKPROPERTY LINE10' SETBACKT.O.PLY MAIN LEVEL 100' - 0" = 7887.32' T.O.FF MAIN LEVEL 100' - 2 1/4" = 7887.51' T.O.SLAB LOWERLEVEL 90' - 0" T.O.SLAB LOWER LEVEL 90' - 0" B C D E REPAIR ALL EXISTING TRIM 7886.00'7886.00' 7887.00' 7886.00' PREVIOUSLY APPROVED WINDOW WELL EXISTING UNFINISHED BASEMENT EXISTING EXTERIOR CONCRETE STAIRS TO REMAINNEW SUB GRADE AREA EXISTING SUBGRADE DOOR TO REMAIN REPLACE THIS BROCKEN GLASS ON BAY WINDOW PROPOSED RAILING AROUND NEW WINDOW WELL 2" STEEL NEWELS WITH 1/4" X 2" HORIZONTAL STEEL PLATE EXISTING ACRYLIC ROOF TO REMAIN OVER DOOR PROPOSED RAILING AROUND EXISTING EGRESS WELL 2" STEEL NEWELS WITH 1/4" X 2" HORIZONTAL STEEL PLATE EXISTING ACRYLIC AND WOOD "ROOF" TO REMAIN T.O.PLY MAIN LEVEL 100' - 0" T.O.PLY UPPER LEVEL 109' - 4 1/2" T.O.PLY UPPER LEVEL 119' - 8" T.O.PLY UPPER LEVEL 109' - 4 1/2"PROPERTY LINE10' SETBACKPROPERTY LINE10' SETBACKT.O.PLY MAIN LEVEL 100' - 0" = 7887.32' T.O.FF MAIN LEVEL 100' - 2 1/4" T.O.SLAB LOWERLEVEL 90' - 0" T.O.SLAB LOWER LEVEL 90' - 0" SCALE: 1/4" = 1'-0"4 EXISTING: WEST ELEVATION SCALE: 1/4" = 1'-0"4 PROPOSED: WEST ELEVATION Scale: AS NOTED ISSUE SCHEMATIC DESIGNDI PAOLA RESIDENCE135 W. FRANCIS ST.ASPEN, COLORADO 816111" ACTUAL IF THE ABOVE DIMENSION DOES NOT MEASURE ONE INCH (1") EXACTLY, THIS DRAWING WILL HAVE BEEN ENLARGED OR REDUCED, AFFECTING ALL LABELED SCALES. ALL DESIGNS, IDEAS ARRANGEMENTS AND PLANS INDICATED BY THESE DRAWINGS AND SPECIFICATIONS ARE THE PROPERTY AND COPYRIGHT OF KIM RAYMOND ARCHITECTS, INC. AND SHALL NEITHER BE USED ON ANY OTHER WORK NOR BE USED BY ANY OTHER PERSON FOR ANY USE WHATSOEVER WITHOUT WRITTEN PERMISSION. WRITTEN DIMENSIONS SHALL TAKE P R E C E D E N C E O V E R S C A L E D DIMENSIONS AND SHALL BE VERIFIED AT T H E S IT E . A N Y DI M E N S I O NA L DISCREPANCY SHALL BE BROUGHT TO THE ATTENTION OF THE ARCHITECT PRIOR TO COMMENCEMENT OF WORK. HPC 07 7/31/23 WEST ELEVATION DATE 04/14/23 www.kimraymondarchitects.com 970-925-2252PRINTED ON: B C D E 7886.00'7886.00' 7887.00' 7886.00' EXISTING UNFINISHED BASEMENT EXISTING EXTERIOR CONCRETE STAIRS TO REMAIN EXISTING SUBGRADE DOOR TO REMAIN T.O.PLY MAIN LEVEL 100' - 0" T.O.PLY UPPER LEVEL 109' - 4 1/2" T.O.PLY UPPER LEVEL 109' - 4 1/2"PROPERTY LINE10' SETBACKPROPERTY LINE10' SETBACKT.O.PLY MAIN LEVEL 100' - 0" = 7887.32' T.O.FF MAIN LEVEL 100' - 2 1/4" = 7887.51' T.O.SLAB LOWERLEVEL 90' - 0" T.O.SLAB LOWER LEVEL 90' - 0" B C D E REPAIR ALL EXISTING TRIM 7886.00'7886.00' 7887.00' 7886.00' PREVIOUSLY APPROVED WINDOW WELL EXISTING UNFINISHED BASEMENT EXISTING EXTERIOR CONCRETE STAIRS TO REMAINNEW SUB GRADE AREA EXISTING SUBGRADE DOOR TO REMAIN REPLACE THIS BROCKEN GLASS ON BAY WINDOW PROPOSED RAILING AROUND NEW WINDOW WELL 2" STEEL NEWELS WITH 1/4" X 2" HORIZONTAL STEEL PLATE EXISTING ACRYLIC ROOF TO REMAIN OVER DOOR PROPOSED RAILING AROUND EXISTING EGRESS WELL 2" STEEL NEWELS WITH 1/4" X 2" HORIZONTAL STEEL PLATE EXISTING ACRYLIC AND WOOD "ROOF" TO REMAIN T.O.PLY MAIN LEVEL 100' - 0" T.O.PLY UPPER LEVEL 109' - 4 1/2" T.O.PLY UPPER LEVEL 119' - 8" T.O.PLY UPPER LEVEL 109' - 4 1/2"PROPERTY LINE10' SETBACKPROPERTY LINE10' SETBACKT.O.PLY MAIN LEVEL 100' - 0" = 7887.32' T.O.FF MAIN LEVEL 100' - 2 1/4" T.O.SLAB LOWERLEVEL 90' - 0" T.O.SLAB LOWER LEVEL 90' - 0" SCALE: 1/4" = 1'-0"4 EXISTING: WEST ELEVATION SCALE: 1/4" = 1'-0"4 PROPOSED: WEST ELEVATION 227 Pitkin County Mailing List of 300 Feet Radius Pitkin County GIS presents the information and data on this web site as a service to the public. Every effort has been made to ensure that the information and data contained in this electronic system is accurate, but the accuracy may change. Mineral estate ownership is not included in this mailing list. Pitkin County does not maintain a database of mineral estate owners. Pitkin County GIS makes no warranty or guarantee concerning the completeness, accuracy, or reliability of the content at this site or at other sites to which we link. Assessing accuracy and reliability of information and data is the sole responsibility of the user. The user understands he or she is solely responsible and liable for use, modification, or distribution of any information or data obtained on this web site. This document contains a Mailing List formatted to be printed on Avery 5160 Labels. If printing, DO NOT "fit to page" or "shrink oversized pages." This will manipulate the margins such that they no longer line up on the labels sheet. Print actual size. From Parcel: 273512421001 on 02/12/2021 Instructions: Disclaimer: http://www.pitkinmapsandmore.com 228 201 WEST SMUGGLER LLC HOUSTON , TX 77056 2121 SAGE RD #333 LEWIS TOBY D TRUST LYNDHURST, OH 441243773 5150 THREE VILLAGE DR #1E CMML PROPERTIES LLC NEW YORK, NY 10022 120 E 56TH ST #320 234 W HALLAM/302 N 2ND ASSOC ASPEN, CO 81611 COMMON AREA 234 W HALLAM AVE BARNHART PAUL F JR HOUSTON, TX 77056 2121 SAGE RD #333 ARGON LLC ASPEN, CO 81611 533 E HOPKINS AVE 3RD FL LEMKIN TODD & KASEY TRUST LOS ANGELES, CA 90077 10771 BELLAGIO RD 111 WEST FRANCIS LLC GREENWICH, CT 06831 28 ROCK RIDGE AVE 100 W FRANCIS LLC COCONUT GROVE, FL 33133 3595 ANCHORAGE WY DILLON DEE E MISSION HILLS, KS 66208 5910 OAKWOOD RD HENRY FREDERICK B TRUST ASPEN, CO 81611 100 W HALLAM ST 210 WEST FRANCIS LLC NAPLES, FL 34102 255 13TH AVE S #202 KAPLAN NATHALIE 2020 QPRT NEW YORK, NY 10022 600 MADISON AVE 16TH FLR FREEDMAN RYAN D WAYNE, PA 19087 PO BOX 638 CITY OF ASPEN ASPEN, CO 81611 130 S GALENA ST 212 WEST FRANCIS LLC NAPLES, FL 34102 255 13TH AVE SOUTH #202 WINTON CHARLES & BARBARA REV TRUST BERKELEY, CA 94705 2949 AVALON AVE LEWIS JONATHAN D TRUST ASPEN, CO 81611 414 N FIRST ST 234 W HALLAM LLC SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94118 207 MAPLE ST CONTINENTAL HOTEL HOLDINGS LLC NEW YORK, NY 10010 15 E 26TH ST #602 HANSON LUCY C PORT TOWNSEND, WA 98368 1775 FIR ST 308 NORTH FIRST LLC FLORHAM PARK, NJ 07932 325 COLUMBIA TURNPIKE #202 MINTY ASPEN LLC BEVERLY HILLS, CA 90212 9777 WILSHIRE BLVD #500 FAMILLIE ALPENHAUS LLC MILWAUKEE, WI 53202 1509 N PROSPECT AVE BEASPEN LLC SAN PEDRO GARZA GARCIA NL 66260 MEXICO, AVE LAZARO CARDENAS 2400 A43 GOLD BARBARA R REV TRUST ASPEN, CO 81611 229 W HALLAM ST ERWIN GREGORY D 2016 REV TRUST DAVENPORT, IA 52801 102 S HARRISON ST #200 VICENZI GEORGE A TRUST ASPEN, CO 81612 PO BOX 2238 ANISSIMOVA-FREEDMAN ANGELINA WAYNE, PA 19087 PO BOX 638 WEST TRUST SANTA BARBARA, CA 93105 1674 LAS CANOAS RD 229 LAMB KARYN 2020 QPRT NEW YORK, NY 10022 600 MADISON AVE 16TH FLR VIBA LLC ASPEN, CO 81612 PO BOX 13 JAMMB LLC EL DORADO HILLS , CA 95762 PO BOX 5560 BRADY WILLIAM JB III LAFAYETTE, CA 94549 1038 SUNRISE RIDGE DR 234 WEST FRANCIS LLC NEW YORK, NY 10174 405 LEXINGTON AVE BRUNDIGE CHELSEA C SNOWMASS, CO 81654 1755 SNOWMASS CREEK RD GERSCHEL EDOUARD 2020 QPRT NEW YORK, NY 10022 600 MADISON AVE 16TH FLR HALLAM PINES CONDO ASSOC ASPEN, CO 81611 220-224 W HALLAM ST 230