HomeMy WebLinkAboutcoa.lu.ec.110 Red Mountain Rd.A052-02
^
,
CASE NUMBER
PARCEL In #
CASE NAME
PROJECT ADDRESS
PLANNER
CASE TYPE
OWNER/APPLICANT
REPRESENTATIVE
DATE OF FINAL ACTION
CITY COUNCIL ACTION
PZ ACTION
ADMIN ACTION
BOA ACTION
DATE CLOSED
BY
~
n
A052-02
2737-072-13001
Oden Lot Line Adjustment/ Stream Margin Amendment
110 Red Mountain Road
James Lindt
Lot Line Adjustment/Stream Margin Amendm
Robert Oden
Carol Ann Jacobson
7/11/02
Approved and Plat Rec
7/24/02
J. Lindt
"......
.. .../
f"""I;
/"""t,
11
MEMORANDUM
TO:
Julie Ann Woods, Community Development Director
James Lindt, Planner JL-
FROM:
RE:
Lot 1, Oden Lot Split, Insnbstantial Stream Margin Review Amendment
Parcel # 2737-072-13-001
DATE:
July 9, 2002
SUMMARY:
The Applicant, Oden and Company, A Partnership, owns a vacant lot along Hunter Creek
that is described as Lot I, of the Oden Lot Split, which was created by Pitkin County in
1988. The Applicant would like to amend the existing building envelope and expand it
away from the river. The subject property is located within 100 feet of the high water
line of Hunter Creek, and therefore, is subject to the Stream Margin Review Section of
the Land Use Code.
Staff believes that the proposed Stream Margin Review Amendment does not require
review by the Planning and Zoning Commission because the Applicant is requesting to
expand the approved building envelope away from Hunter Creek and will not affect the
riparian area that the Stream Margin Review was enacted to protect. The current
building envelope is situated such that the majority of the building envelope is not build-
able because of the steepness of the slopes that descend down towards Hunter Creek to
the north. The proposal would allow for the building envelope on Lot I to be brought into
greater compliance with the Stream Margin Review Standards because it would allow for
a residence to be constructed further from Hunter Creek as is consistent with the review
criteria for amending an ESA development order.
The Applicant is not at this time requesting approval of a site-specific development plan.
The Applicant has concurrently applied for a Subdivision Exemption for a lot line
adjustment to allow for the enlargement of Lot I, of the Oden Lot Split. The proposed
lot line adjustment would allow the Applicant to expand Lot I, by amending its lot lines
to incorporate a portion of the parcel located to the southeast. The parcel directly to the
southeast of Lot I is also owned by the Applicant. Thus, the proposed lot line adjustment
would allow for the existing building envelope to be expanded away from Hunter Creek.
Additionally, any future development on the parcel will require Stream Margin Review
approval pursuant to Land Use Code Section 26.435.
Staff has reviewed this proposed amendment to the Stream Margin Review and
recommends administrative approval by the Director, with conditions.
APPLICANT:
Oden and Company, Owner.
I
r".
,........
~:}
LOCATION:
Lot #1,Oden Lot Split.
ZONING:
R-15APD
REVIEW PROCEDURE:
Insubstantial amendments to an approved Stream Margin Review may be approved by
the Community Development Director, pursuant to Land Use Code Section 26.435.100.
RECOMMENDATION:
Staff recommends that the Community Development Director approve an amendment to
the Stream Margin Development Order on Lot I, Oden Lot Split to allow for the
approved building envelope to be moved further away from Hunter Creek.
APPROVAL:
I hereby approve this Amendment to the Stream Margin Review for Lot # I, Oden Lot
Split with the following conditions:
I. The Applicant shall record a plat with the Pitkin County Clerk and Recorder showing
the existing and the new building envelopes within 180 days of approval.
2. Any future development within the newly proposed building envelope shall require
Stream Margin Review Approval, pursuant to Land Use Code Section 26.435.040,
Stream Margin Review.
3. The Applicant shall vacate the portion of the existing 20 foot wide access easement
that would encroach into the newly proposed building envelope. The Applicant shall
dedicate a new 20 foot wide access easement on the "sale parcel" to gain vehicular
~'PPBO\J~S to Lots I & 2, of the Oden Lot Split from Red Mountain Road.
Jut \I 9 '2.1)1)'2.
. -NI O\Rt:C1CM
QO\.\\.\\Jll1T1 g~~~;~~\l
ACCEPTANCE:
I, as the landowner, do hereby agree to the conditions of this Stream Margin Review
Amendment.
date -':&<>Z"
nity Development Director
..--,.-
date
Robert Oden
Oden & Company, A Partnership
2
JUL. 10.2002 10: 14AM
ATY OF ASPEN
PI
NO, 460S-P. 3
LOCATION: '
Lot #1,Oden Lot Split.
ZONING:
R-I5A PD
REVIEW PROCEDURE:
Insubstantial amendments to an approved Stream Margin Review may be approved by
the Community Development Director, pursuant to Land Use Code Section 26.435.100.
R'ECOlVlMENDATION:
Staff recommends that the Community Development Director approve an amendment to
the Stream Margin Development Order on Lot 1, Oden Lot Split to allow for the
approved building envelope to be moved further away from Hunter Creek.
APPROVAL:
I hereby approve this Amendment to the Stream Margin Review for Lot # I, Oden Lot
Split with the following conditions:
1. The Applicant shall record a plat with the Pitkin County Clerk and Recorder showing
the existing and the new building envelopes within 180 days of approval.
2. Any future development within the newly proposed building envelope shall require
Stream Margin Review Approval, pnrsuant to Land Use Code Section 26.435.040,
Stream Margin Review.
3. The Applicant shall vacate the portion of the existing 20 foot wide access easement
that would encroach into the newly proposed building envelope. The Applicant shall
dedicate a new 20 foot wide access easement on the "sale parcel" to gain vehicular
p...ppp.Q\J€Qs to Lots 1 & 2, of the Oden Lot Split from Red Mountain Road.
JUt \I I;} '2.1)1)'2.
~\O\f\t.C\\)\
CO\M<l\J\\\T1~~~~~~\l
.'
ACCEJ.>TANCE:
I, as the landowner, do hereby agree to the conditions of this Stream Margin Review
Amendment.
date 1h/<>'2,.
nity Development Director
kf1L~
Robert Oden
~den & Company, A Partnership
date U J !-<'fw <9"---
2
/"""t,
(")
ATTACHMENTS:
Exhibit A -- Review Criteria and Staff Findings
Exhibit B -- Draft Plat (includes proposed Building Envelope)
3
r:
~
EXHIBIT A
REVIEW CRITERIA AND STAFF FINDINGS:
An application for an insubstantial amendment to a Stream Margin Review may be
approved if it complies with the following criteria to the extent practical.
1. The development order is valid and there is substantial compliance with the
conditions of approval.
Staff Findin2
The building envelope for Lot 1, of the Oden Lot Split was established in Pitkin County
prior to the lot being annexed into the City. The proposal to expand the building
envelope to the southeast brings the building envelope more into compliance with the
Stream Margin Review Standards in that the proposed building envelope would allow for
the residence to be constructed further from the riparian area. Any future development
that is to occur on the site will still require a Stream Margin Review. Staff finds this
criterion to be met.
2. The Development Order is either remaining in conformance with the review
criteria set forth in the specific ESA or it is demonstrated that the Development
Order is in compliance with any amendments to the ESA criteria.
Staff Findin2
Staff believes that the proposed stream margin amendment will bring the existing
building envelope more into compliance with the Stream Margin Review Standards. The
existing building envelope was established under the County's review and much of it is
unbuildable because of the steep slopes that descend down to Hunter Creek on the
northern portion of the property. The proposed building envelope will allow for a
residence to be constructed further from the riparian area as is consistent with the Stream
Margin Review Standards. Staff finds this criterion to be met.
3. The change is in conformance with the exemption criteria for the specific
ESA, as provided in this Section, considering the Development Order as a
completed development for the purposes of evaluating the change.
Staff Findin2
Staff believes that the proposed amendment meets the Stream Margin Review Exemption
Criteria. No development is currently being proposed on the site. Any future
development within the adjusted building envelope will still require Stream Margin
Review Approval. Staff finds this criterion to be met.
4. The change is in compliance with all other provisions of this Title.
/"""t,
f""'l
Staff Finding
Staff believes that the proposed amendment is in compliance with all other provisions of
the Land Use Code.' The proposed amendment will bring the approved building envelope
into better conformance with the Stream Margin Review Standards. The proposed
building envelope is in compliance with the R-15A (Moderate-Density Residential) Zone
District's setback requirements. Any future development on the site will still be subject
to Stream Margin Review Approval. Staff finds this criterion to be met.
{""'I,
(')
Alpine Surveys, Inc.
Post Office Box 1730
Aspen, Colorado 81612
970 925 2688
JUNE 11, 2002
JOB NO. 86-160 ODEN
LEGAL DESCRIPTION
A PARCEL OF LAND SITUATED IN THE NORTHWEST QUARTER OF
SECTION 7, TOWNSHIP 10 SOUTH, RANGE 84 WEST OF THE
SIXTH PRINCIPAL MERIDIAN, PITKIN COUNTY, COLORADO,
MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS:
BEGINNING AT A POINT WHENCE THE WEST QUARTER CORNER
OF SAID SECTION 7 BEARS SOUTH 50.00 FEET AND WEST
938.60 FEET;
THENCE EAST 69.79 FEET;
THENCE SOUTH 50.00 FEET;
THENCE WEST 69.79 FEET; AND
THENCE NORTH 50.00 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING.
r,
r""1
130 S. Galena St.
AspenC081611
(970) 920-5090
(970) 920-5439, fax
Aspen/Pitkin
Community
Development
Department
Fax
To: Carol Ann Jacobson From: James Lindt
Fax: 925-9182 Pages:
Phone: Date: 6/4/02
Re: Oden Plat Comments CC:
o Urgent
o For Review
o Please Comment 0 Please Reply
o Please Recycle
. Comments:
Hi Carol Ann,
Please find attached our comments regarding the Oden plat. Please pass the comments along to Jim
Reeser for changes to be made to the plat. When he is done making the changes, please submit two
mylar copies to me with all of the signatures completed with the exception of the Community
Development Director, City Engineer, and Pitkin County Clerk and Recorder. Please feel free to call
me at 920-5095 if you have any questions.
Thanks,
James
r1
1"1
MEMORA:NDlfM
To: Carol Ann Kopf
From:
James Lindt, Planner CS-L-
Date: June 4, 2002
Re: aden Lot Line Adjustment and Stream Margin Amendment
Plat- Community Development Department's Comments
1. Amend Plat Title to say, "aden Lot Line Adjustment and Stream';
Margin Review Amendment".
2. Add purpose statement under plat title that states, "The purpose of this
plat is to amend the property lines of Lot 1, aden Lot Split and Sale V
Parcel, aden Lot Split. The purpose of this plat is also to amend the
building envelope on Lot 1, aden Lot Split.
3. Show and label approved and proposed building envelope for Lot 1,;
aden Lot Split.
4. Include a plat note that states, "This Lot Line Adjustment will not J
effect the development rights, nor increase the allowable FAR or
density on either of the parcels effected by the Lot Line Adjustment".
5. Amend Community Development Director's signature block to say,
"This aden Lot Line Adjustment and Stream Margin Amendment Ply
was approved by the Director of the Department of Community
Development of the City of Aspen, Colorado this _ day of
,2002."
6. Amend the City Engineer's signature block to say, "This aden Lot J
Line Adjustment and Stream Margin Amendment Plat was approved
by the City Engineer of the City of Aspen, Colorado this _ day of
,2002."
7. Include a title certificate and mortgagee's certificate if applicable.
8. All of the Community Development Engineer's Comments must be
reflected on the final set of two mylar plats in addition to the
Community Development Department's comments.
9. Obtain all signatures with the exception of the City Community
Development Director, City Engineer, and Pitkin County Clerk and
Recorder prior to submitting mylars to Community Development
Department.
1""\
r"\
,
From: John Niewoehner
City of Aspen Co unit Development Engineer
.
To: James Lindt
THE CrTY OF ASPEN
Date: June 3, 2002
RE: Oden Lot Line Adjustment
My comments on the Oden Lot Line Adjustment Plat are as follows:
tCl/~)1 Under the heading "Adjusted Sale Parcel" (the ninth line down), the
bearing should read S 40-45-00 W.
V V-SuNey needs to be performed or verified in the last twelve months.
P.uNey needs to be tied to government monument system (i.e City
monument).
. . Property corners must be monumented for both the "Adjusted Lot 1"
property and "Adjusted Sale Parcel".
D :/J ohnN/ oden-Iotline-adj ust
MAR-18-2002 MON 10:33 AM~
FAX NOM
, J
p, 02
CITY OF ASPEN
PRE.APPLlCA TION CONFERENCE SUMMARY
PLANNER:
PROJECT:
REPRESENTATIVE:
OWNER:
TYPE OF Al'l'LlCATfON:
DESCRli'TION:
James Lindt, 920,5095 DATE: 3.18,02
aden Vacant Parcel
Cal'Cll Ann Jacobson n -too . ~ ,'.\
Oden BnteFflFises '1-. C'mwr"-'O' I 1\ "0,).. ~
o Stop. Stream Margin Review, Lot LineAcUustment
Applicant wOllld like to amend the established building envelope and movo it back fi'olll the
River, Amending the building envelopo in this nature has been done adnlinistrative1y in the
past. The applicant also possibly would like to do a Lot Line Adjustment.
Land Use Code Section(s)
26.435.40 Stream Margin Review
26.480.040 Lot Line Adjustment
Review by:
Staff for complete application, referral agencies for toellllical conSideration., Community
Development Director for final approval.
No, unless the ComU1unityDevelopment Dircetor does not feol that the proposed appliealion
meet, the Stream Margin Review Criteria.
'Ensinccring
Planning Deposit $500 for 2.5 HI'S of Planner Time
Engineering Referral $180
$680
i
Pu blie Hearing:
Referral Agencies: '
Planning Fees:
Referral Agency Fees:
To(a I Deposit:
To apply, submit the following information:
I, Total Depusit fOl' review of application,
2. Applicant's mnnc. 4ddrc~s and tckpb~1ne nllmbel', cOI1H.\im.:d witbln 0 Jellc! sign cd by the applicant stalh1g tbe name, addrcs,c:" nl1~'
ldcphol1c number of the l'cprC$(,,':nlativc authorized to act Ol~ b~h!llfofthe llpp!i"'tmt.
J. S J gncd n:c agreement,
4. Prc..appliCflti<.lJ1 Confetl!:[lCe Summnl'Y.
5. I.nnt! U!)C Applicl'ILion
6, -rJiLlll,;ll":VU"! R~qlr;N<~~~
7, .-\Vrin...H dl.:~l,;nptlon ofcx.i.a;uij ""\Juditl0ns and pJUpo~l.:d al1cro.tJolTS.
8. A site impl'ov~lTI~nt SUI'vCY.
9. An 8 1/2" x I J" vicinily map locating the ~llbjcct pill'eels within the: Ci~y of Aspen.
10, A WI'i~"iCtiPtjon (Jfthe pJ'Oposal and il wI'iUl.:nt'Xplanation of how a propO$l.:d dcvelopll"lc.:nt
C9J'>>(TllCS with the review slundat'ds rclcvt\l1t to the development applicniion.
II. kceJ'Y-i,jO~'-WhicIHUl'cct'''"''-Prol'05<-d-dovoto]ll11C<l[.
12. Pro(~r ofoWJ)~t'sIlip.
13, Addition,al malerials ~IS required by spccHlc review. Please reD.:r to the l'lppljc~\li()n packet for specific submittal fC(}llin.'mcl1t!i' ()'t \0 the
code sections noted aboyC'.
14. -LCoplos of the cOmrle!i; tlpp!iCrttiOri p~lcket (items 1-13)
Proces~ :
Apply, Planner rcvi~ws Case fol' completeness and sends lo Development Review Commillcc{l>RC) for lcchnieal con!;lidcr.J.tioos, Phmnc!' writes
staff mcm!') ('md recommendation and has Community n~velopl11cnt !)irCi;(or Review for flpproval. If npprovcd. CI)rnmunity Developmenl
!)t;pn"llllcnt iSSllt;" devr.:lopmcnt ol'der, A Dulldi"g Pcnnit thCI~.fI111l)t be obtajlle~1 prior to cOI\SlrllCliol1. 'i'he Dpplication may be token to 1he PI:uming
nnd Zoning C(~L11rnission ifCommu111ty O(:vdopmcnt Dirl,:Clol" does not fecl Ihm applic('llion mcct~ the $llmdards f~)r a Stream M~rgin Revicw,
DiscJ;limer:
The foregoing summnry I::; advi~oty in l1!1tllL'C only and is flot binding on the City. The summary is based on Current zoniflg. which is suhj~cl 10
cn;mgc in the fulmc. nnel upon n,ctuall'~prc$cnl~llions that mayor may 1l0~ be accurate. The ~Ul11mo.l"y dOi;s not crcate lc;gMI or vcmed Tight~,
MAR-18-2002 MON 10:34 AM~
PROJECT:
FAX NOn
LAND USE ApPLlCA TlON
p, 04
Name: Lo'l () to 2- G rl ~VL Lc f s;' P L I I
Location:
(Indicate street address, lot & block number, legal description wherc appropriate)
ApPLICANT:
Name:
Address:
Phone#:
d "'-VL .r CL p ~+ VLtc0
C3 (I b {2-,_ i \.tu. D 0 "'-- ~ ('~ ~ R.fJr~
q L~ _ J,:,-y if
REPRESENTATIVE:
Name: 0
Addrcss:
Phone #:
{~4~~
TYPE OF ApPLICATION: (please check all that apply):
0 Conditional Use 0 Conceptua I PUD 0 Conceptual Historic Deve.
0 Special Review 0 Final PUD (& PUD Amendment) 0 Pinall1istoric Development
0 DeSign Review Appeal 0 Conceptual SPA 0 Minor Historic Dcvl.
0 GMQS Allotmcnt 0 Final SPA (& SPA Amendment) 0 Historic Demolition
0 GMQS Exemption 0 Subdivision 0 Historic Designation
0 ESA - 8040 Grcenline, Strcam 0 Subdivision Exemption (includcs 0 Small Lodge Conversion/
Margin, Hallam Lake Bluff, condominiumizatlon) Expansion
Mountain View Plane
0 Lot Split 0 Tcmporary Use 0 Other:
1m Lot Linc Adjustment 0 Text/Map Amendment
EXISTING CONDITIONS: (description of existing buildings, uses, previous approvals, etc.)
I
J
PROPOSAL: (descriptipll of propos cd buildings, uses, modifications, etc.)
I
Have you attached the following?
o Pre-Application Conference Summary
o Attacrunent #1, Signed Fec Agreement
o Response to Attachmcnt #2, Dimensional Requirements FOmt
o Response 10 Attachment #3, Minimum Submission Contents
o Response to Attachment #4, Specific Submission Contents
o Response to Attacruncnt #5, Revicw Standards for Your Application
FEES Due: $
MAR-18-2002 MON 10:34 AM~
FAX NOt""'!
P. 05
ATTACHMENT 1
ASPEN/PI1'KI~, ...'.. ..... ...., .., '. .'.
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT
City of Aspen Development Application Fee Policy
The City of Aspen, pursuant to Ordinance 57 (Series of2000), has established a fee structure jor
the processing of land use applications. A flat fee or dcposit is collected for land use applications
bascd on the type of application submitted. Refcrral fees for other City departments reviewing
the application will also be collected when necessary. One check including the deposit for
PIalUling and referral agency fees must be submitted with each land use application, made
payable to the Aspen/Pitkin Community Development Department. Applications will n(lt be
aeecpted for processing without the required application fee.
A flat fee is collected by Community Development for Administrative Approvals which
normally take a minimal and predictable amount of staff time to process. The fee is not
refundable.
A deposit is collected by Community Development when more extensive staff review is required,
as hours are likely to vary substantially from one application to another. Actual staff time spcnt
will be charged against the deposit. Several different staff membcrs may charge their time spent
on the case in addition to the case plalmer. Staff time is logged to the case and staff can provide
a summary report of hours spent at the applicant's request.
After the deposit has been expended, the applicant will be billed monthly based on actual staff
hours. Applicants may accrue and be billed additional expenscs for a planner's time spent on the
case following any hearing or approvals, up until the applicant applics fOr a building permit.
Current billings must be paid within 30 days Or processing oftbe application will be suspcnded.
If an applicant has previously failed to pay application fees as required, no new or additional
applications will be acccpted for processing until (he outstanding fees are paid. In no case will
l3uilding Permits be issued until all costs associated with case processing have been paid.
When the case plarmer determines that the case is complcted (whether approvcd or not
approved), the case is considered closed and any remaining balance from the deposit will be
refunded to the applicant.
Applications which require a deposit must include an Al!reement fOr Pavment of Development
Application Fees. TIle Agrccment establishes the applicant as being rcsponsible for payment of
all costs associated with processing. the application. The Agreement must be signed by the
party responsible for payment and submitted with the application and fee in order for a
land use case to be opened.
The current complete fee schedule for land use applications is listcd On the reverse side.
MAR-18-2002 MON 10:34 AM
A
FAX NO.
~
ASPEN/PITKIN COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT
2001 LAND USE APPLICATION FEES
CATEGORY
Major
Minor
Staff Approvals
Flat Fee
Exempt HPC
Minor HPC
Significant HPC <1000 sq. ft
Significant HPC >1000 sq. ft.
Demolition, Partial Demolition, Relocation
Referral Fees - Environmental Health
Major
Minor
Referral Fees - Housing
Major
Minor
Referral Fees. City Engineer
Major
Minor
Hourly Rate
HOURS
DEPOSIT
12
6
2,405.00
1,205.00
500.00
500.00
1205.00
2405.00
2405.00
P. 06
FLAT FEE
280.00
70.00
345.00
180,00
345.00
180.00
345.00
180.00
205.00
MAR-18-2002 MON 10:34 A~
,- ~
FAX Nn
p, 07
"
ASPEN/PITKIN
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT
'-
~reemcnl for PaVlnent ofCilv of Asprn Development Appli~.tion Fees
ft, fo.,J'~1~
{ Gn''^''t''''i
CITY OF ASPEN (hereinafter CITY) and C) 1e to\..
(hel'elnafter APPLICANT) AGREE AS FOLLOWS:
~
1. APPLICANT has submitted to CITY an apPlicatiOn% .:.1. -- </-,
0S~<:;'~\;~ ~ &,;f;-~~ ~ 1.J<.4
(hereinafter, THE PROJECT). I >
2, APPLICANT understands and agrees that City of Aspen Ordinance NO. 57 (Series of 2000)
establishes a fee structure for Land Use applications and the payment of all processing fees is a condition precedent
to a determination of application completeness,
3. APPLICANT and CITY agree that becau,e of the si7.e, nature or scope of the proposed project, it
is not posoible at this time to ascertain the full extent of the costs involved in proec.ssing the application.
APPLlCAN1' and CI1'Y fUrtJler agree that it is in the interest of the parties that APPLICANT make payment of an
initial deposit and to thereafter pennit additional costs to be billed to APPLICANT On a monthly basis,
APPLICANT agrees additional costs may accrue following their hearings and/or approvals, APPLICANT agrees he
will bc benefiled by retaining greater cash liquidity and will make additional payments upon notification by lhe
C1TY when d,ey are necessary as costs are incurred. CITY agrees it will be benefited through the greater certainty
of recovering its full COSts to process APPLICANT'S application.
4. CITY and APPLICANT further agree that it is impraclicable for CITY staff to complete
processing or present sufficient information to the Planning Commission and/or City Council to enable the rImming
Commission and/or City Council to make legally required findings for project consideration, unless cun-ent billings
are paid in full prior to decision.
5. Therefore, APPLICANT agrees that ill consideration of the CITY's waiver of its right to colket
full fees prior to a detenninalion of application completeness, APPLICANT shall pay an h,itial deposit in the
amonnlof$_ W So, 0 U Which is for -2 .6' hOurs of Community Development staff time, and jf actual
recorded costs exceed th. initial deposh, APPLICANT shall pay additional monthly billings to CITY to reimburse
the CITY for the processing of the application mentioned above, including post apprOval review at a rale of $205.00
per plalUler hour over the inilial deposit. Such periodic payments shall be made within 30 days of the billing date.
APPLICANT furlher agrees that failure to pay such accrued costs sl,all be grounds for Susrension of processing,
aIld in no case will bUilding pennits be issued until all costs associated willi case processing have been paid.
CITY OF ASPEN
APPLICANT
lly:
~JJL
By: f~~~ e dk- ~r;
Date: S- - 5 I - CJ Z.
i. Ann Woods
ommunity lJevelopment Director
Mailing Address:
/7 0 fIn,,- ~ l. ()
~, CiJ <6 I 10 It..-
g:ls u ppo rllformsla grp.yas.doc
l/l0/0I
MAR-18-2002 MON 10:34 AM
(""\"
FAX N~
^'" 'J
p, 03
"
City of Aspen Community Development ~
Standard Application Packa~ ~
Staff Approval APPlication,
Attachcd is a Development Application package for submission iofyour application. Includcd in
l.his package are the following attachments: I
1. Development Application Fcc Policy and Fee SChCdUlt
2, Application Form !
3. Description of Minimum Contcnts of Dcvelopment Ap4ication
4. Description of Specific Contents for Submission OfYOUr!APPlication (insert appropriate
attachment) /"
5. Copy ofRcview Standards for Your Application (insc1 appropriate attachment)
,
General Summary of Your Application Process (insert/approPriate attachment)
, ,
t
Generally, to submit a complete application, you should fill in the application form and attach to it
that written llnd mapped infomlation identified in Attachments 3 and 4. Please note that all
applications require responses to the review standards for that particular development type. The
standards for your application arc listed in Attachment 5.
,
6.
We strongly encourage all applicants to hold a pre-application conference with a Planner in
the Community Development Department so that the requirements for submitting a complete
application can be fully described to you.
Please also recognize that ,eview ofl.hese materials does not substitute for a complete review of the
Aspen Land Use Regulations, While l.his application package attempts to summarize the key
provisions of the Code as they apply to your type of development, it emmot possibly replicate the
detail or the scope of the Code. If you hllVe questions which are not answered by the materials in
this packagc, we suggest that YO)! contact the staff member assigned to your case or consult the
applicable sections of the Aspen Land Use Rcgulations.
MAR-18-2002 MON 10:35 A~
FAX ~~
p, 11
"
"
ATTACHMENT 4
Subdivision Exemption by Planning Director
Lot Line Adjustment
The Planning Director shall exempt an adjustment of a lot line between contiguous lots if all the
folJowing conditions are met.
1. It is demonstrated that the request is to corrce( an enginecring or survey error in a recorded plat
or is to permit an insubstantial boundary change between adjacent parcels; and
2, All landowners whose lot lines are being adjusted shall provide written consent to the
application; and
3. It is demonstrated that the request is to address spccific hardShip; and
4. 1he corrected plat will meet the standards of this division, and confonn to the requiremcnt~ of
this chapter, including the dimensional requirements of the zone district in which the lots are
located, exccpt in cases of an existing nonconforming lot, in which the adjustment shall not
im'rease the nonconformity of the lot; and
5. It is demonstrated that the lot line adjustment will Mt affect the development rights or
pennitted density of the affected lots by providing the opportunity to ereate a new lot for resaJe
or development.
* * There is no Attachment 5 associated with this application.
att4Jla
MAR-18-2002 MON 10:35 AM~
FAX NO.
(')
,./
p, 15
Attachment 6
1. A""'d ........a.'n "",,,_ Dwio, fui, "'""""",,,,, mocting, ""If mil ,~"""",
the review process which applies to YOur development proposal and will idcntify tlle materials
necessary to review your application.
Staff Approval Development Review Procedllre
2. Submi' Dw........, A..Da.,.. B.,,,, '" "'~ "'~'l'Pli"Q", '.""g, "'" ""'oJ'
respond to the application package and submit ihe requested number of copies ofthc COJllplete
application and the appropriate processing fee to the Community Development Department.
3. Determination of Completeness. Wiihin five working days oft11C date of YOUr
SUbmission, staff Will review the application, and will notifY you in writing whether the application
is complete or if additional matcrials arc required. Please be aware ihat the Plllpose of the
completeness review is to determine whether or not the infomlation you have submitted is adequate
to review the reques~ and not whether tile infollllatiOIl is sufticiem to obtain approval.
4. Staff Review of Development Application. Once your applicatiOn is dctermined to be
COmplete, it will be reviewed by the staff for compliance with the applicable standards oftbo Codc,
During the staff review stage, the application will be referred to other agencies for comments. The
Planncr assigned to your case or the agency may Contact you if additional information is needed Or
ifproblems are identified. A Inemo will be written by the staffznClnber for signature by the
Community Development Director, The memo will explain Whether your application complies
wiih the Code and will list any COnditions which should apply ifihe application is to be approved.
Final apprOval of any Development Application which amends a reCorded document, SUch
as a plat, agreement or deed restriction, Will require ihe applicant to prepare an lI1!1ended version of
that document for review and apprOval by staff. Stail'will provide thc applicant with the applicable
contents for the revised plat, while the City Attorney is nonnally in cllargc of the form for recorded
agreements and deed restrictions. We suggest that you not go to the trouble 01' eXpcnse ofprepar1ng
tIlese documents until the staff has determined that your application is eligible for ihe requested
amendmcnt or exemption.
5. Rcccipt of nui/ding Permit. Once you have received a COpy of the signed staff approval,
you may prOceed to building pellll it review. During this time, YOur project Will be examined for its
Compliance With the Uniforn) Building Code. Ii will also be checked for Compliance with
applicable prOVisions of the Land Use Regulations which We.re not reviewed in detail during tho
One step review (this might include a check oflloor area ratios, setbacks, parking, open space aJld
tile like). Fees for water, sewer, paJ'ks and employee housing will be collected if dlle. Any
document required to be recorded, SUch as a plat, deed restriction Or agreement, will need to be
reviewed and recorded before a Building Permit is submitted.
Ostepsum.doc