HomeMy WebLinkAboutFile Documents.535 E Cooper Ave.0004.2019 (15).ACBK ASCEPTIO
N#: 635140, 01/03/2017 at
RECEIVED
10•
43:13 .iVl
1 OF 3, R,1$23.00 Doc-Code RESOLUTION
1/7/2 019 Janice 1`i. Vo's Caudill, Pitkin County, CO
ASPEN — —
RUILDING DEPARTMENT RESOLUTION NO. 36
(SERIES OF 2`016) -
/; _/'
A RESOLUTION OF THE ASPEN HISTORIC` F►R" ES,ERVATION_COMMI SSION
GRANTING FINAL COMMERCIAL DESIGN! REVIEW,-'i FINAL MAJOR
DEVELOPMENT AND GROWTH MANAGEMENT APPROVALS ..FOR 529-535 E
COOPER AVENUE, LOTS H, I AND THE EASTEI Ly 5' OF LOT , BLOCK 96, CITY
OF ASPEN,PITKIN COUNTY, COLORADO ,r
Parcel IDs: 2737.182-22-101 through 112, 2737182 22-801
WHEREAS, the Community Development Department received an application from NJ
Stein, LLC (Applicant), represented-by Mitch Haas of Haas Land Planning for the following land
use review approvals:
• Commercial Design Review, pursua;t to Land Use Code Section 26.412;
• Major Development Final Review, pursuant to Land Use Code Section 26.415;
•- „--
'Growth Management Review,pursuant to Land Use -Code_Section 26.470, and;
WHEREAS, all code citation references are to the City of'Aspen Land Use Code in effect
oh the day —aeptember 25, 2015, as applicable to this Project; and,
WHEREAS,pursuant.i.o Chapter 26.304„C-ommon Development Review Procedures, and
Section 26.304.060.B.4,Modification of Review Procedures, all other necessary land use reviews,
as identified herein, have been combined to be considered by the Historic Preservation
Commission at a duly noticed public hearing after considering recommendations by the
Community Development Director and relevant referral agencies;and,
WHEREAS;such combination of review procedures was done to ensure clarity of review,
was accomplished with all required public noticing provided as evidenced by an affidavit of public
noticing submitted to the record, and the public was provided a thorough and full review of the
proposed development; and,
WHEREAS,the Community Development Department received referral comments from
APCHA, City Engineering, Zoning,Building Department,Environmental Health Department,and
Parks Department; and,
WHEREAS, said referral agencies and the Aspen Community Development Department
reviewed the proposed Application and recommended continuation; and,
WHEREAS, the Historic Preservation Commission reviewed the Application at a duly
noticed public hearing on December 14, 2016, during which the recommendations of the
Community Development Director and comments from the public were requested and heard by
the Historic Preservation Commission; and,
WHEREAS, during a duly noticed public hearing on December 14, 2016, the Historic
Preservation Commission approved Resolution No. 36, Series of 2016, by a five to zero (5 - 0)
vote granting final approvals and growth management approval,with the recommended conditions
of approval listed hereinafter.
Historic Preservation Commission
Resolution No. 36, Series 2016
• Page 1 of 3
•
RECEIVED
1/7/2019
ASPS THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED BY THE HISTORIC PRESERVATION
BUILDING DEP' ISSION OF THE CITY OF ASPEN, COLORADO THAT:
Section 1: Approvals
Pursuant to the procedures and standards set forth in Title 26 of the Aspen Municipal Code, the
Historic Preservation Commission hereby grants Final Major Development, Final Commercial
Design and Growth Management approval for 529-535 E. Cooper Avenue subject to the
recommended conditions of approval as listed herein.
Section 2: Growth Management
1. Reconstruction Credit — The application represents an existing net leasable area of 5,100 sq.
ft. This credit and the FTEs generated by the square footage will be verified and applied to the
project at building permit submission. Any reconstruction credit shall be valid for one (1) year
following issuance of a demolition permit, pursuant to Chapter 26.470.130.
2. Allotments—Growth Management allotments for 919 sq. ft. are granted from the 2016 GMQS
calendar year.
3. Affordable Housing Mitigation—The mitigation required for the project is as follows:
a. The existing one-bedroom free-market residential unit houses 1.75 FTEs. The
Applicant has proposed 100% replacement through the provision of Affordable
Housing Credits. Pursuant to Chapter 26.470.070.5(4), HPC has determined that
on-site replacement of this unit is an inappropriate solution due to the site's physical
constraints. The provision of Affordable Housing Credits equal to 0.875 FTEs at
Category 4 is approved as mitigation for the demolition of this unit.
b. The proposed commercial expansion generates 4.49 FTEs. Pursuant to Section
26.470.070.1, the first 4 FTEs shall not require mitigation. The remaining 0.49
FTEs shall be mitigated at a rate of 30% for a total of 0.15 FTEs to be provided in
the form of Affordable Housing Credits at Category 4.
Section 3: Parking
HPC hereby grants a waiver of the cash in lieu fee required for the parking generated by the
additional commercial space as part of the City's commitment to support owners of historic
properties in their efforts to maintain, preserve and enhance their historic properties.
Section 4: TIA
The proposed TIA measures are approved by the Engineering and Transportation Departments. All
approved Transportation Mitigation Requirements shall be included as part of the building permit
application.
Section 5:
All material representations and commitments made by the Applicant pursuant to the development
proposal approvals as herein awarded, whether in public hearing or documentation presented
before the Community Development Department and the Historic Preservation Commission are
Historic Preservation Commission
Resolution No. 36, Series 2016
Page 2 of 3
RECEIVED
1/7/2019
ASPS ncorporated in such plan development approvals and the same shall be complied with as
BUILDING DEPA Illy setforth herein, unless amended by other specific conditions or an authorized authority.
Section 6:
This Resolution shall not affect any existing litigation and shall not operate as an abatement of any
action or proceeding now pending under or by virtue of the ordinances repealed or amended as
herein provided, and the same shall be conducted and concluded under such prior ordinances.
Section 7:
If any section, subsection, sentence, clause, phrase, or portion of this Resolution is for any reason
held invalid or unconstitutional in a court of competent jurisdiction, such portion shall be deemed
a separate, distinct and independent provision and shall not affect the validity of the remaining
portions thereof
FINALLY, adopted, passed and approved this 14th day of December, 2016.
Appr ed,a o form: Appd to co nt:
An a an,Assistant City Attorney Willis Pember, Chair
Attest•
Kathy Stric and,Deputy City Clerk
Historic Preservation Commission
Resolution No. 36, Series 2016
Page 3 of 3