HomeMy WebLinkAboutLand Use Case.HP.205 S Third St.HPC047-01
CASE NUMBER
PARCELID#
CASE NAME
PROJECT ADDRESS
PLANNER
CASE TYPE
OWNER/APPLICANT
REPRESENTATIVE
DATE OF FINAL ACTION
CITY COUNCIL ACTION
PZ ACTION
ADMIN ACTION
BOA ACTION
DATE CLOSED'
BY
r"l
HPC047-01
2735-124-65003
205 S. Third Street Minor HPC
205 S. Third St.
Amy Guthrie
Minor HPC
Mary Conklin
Steve Oanuff
10/10/01
HPC Reso. 47-2001
Approved
6/17/02
J. Lindt
A
r\
n
\
V1Q..
,r'\
!II. ~)
f"'\
MEMORANDUM
TO:
Aspen Historic Preservation Commission
FROM:
Amy Guthrie, Historic Preservation Officer
RE:
205 S. Third Street- Final Review, PUBLIC HEARING
DATE:
October 10, 2001
SUMMARY: This property contains a house historically known as the "Matthew
Callahan Log Cabin." It is a local landmark and is listed on the National Register of
Historic Places.
On September 12th, HPC granted Conceptual approval for a small addition to the existing
residence.
APPLICANT: Walter and Kitty Sherwin, represented by Mark Conklin and Steve
Danuff.
LOCATION: 205 S. Third Street, the east Yz of Lot G, Lot H, and Lot I, Block 39, City
and Townsite of Aspen.
PARCEL ID: 2735-124-65-003.
DEVELOPMENT REVIEW STANDARDS
All development inan "H," Historic Overlay District or development involving a historic
landmark must meet all four of the following Development Review Standards, from
Section 26.72.01O(D) of the Aspen Land Use Code in order for HPC to grant approval.
1. Standard: The proposed development is compatible in general design, massing
and volume, scale and site plan with designated historic Structures located on the
parcel and with development on adjacent parcels when the subject site is in a "H,"
Historic Overlay District or is adjacent to an Historic Landmark. For historic
landmarks where proposed development would extend into front yard, side yard and
rear yard setbacks, extend into the minimum distance between buildings on the lot,
exceed the allowed floor area by up to five hundred (500) square feet, or exceed the
allowed site covered by up to five (5) percent, HPC may grant necessary variances
after making a finding that such variation is more compatible in character with the
historic landmark and the neighborhood thim would be development in accord with
dimensional requirements. ' In no event shall variations pursuant to this Section
P33
I~
,,;,',
4:+
exceed those variations allowed under Section 26.520.040(B)(2), for detached
accessory dwelling units.
Staff Response: The National Register form states that this is the oldest existing hand
hewn log structUre left in Aspen and dates its construction at 1885 or earlier. There are two
small wood frame additions that have been made to the original house on the west and south
sides.
The applicant proposes to build at the southwest comer of the cabin, adjoining earlier
additions to the log building. No dates are available for when those additions were made.
This block is not included on the Sanborne map.
The home is currently about 1,000 square feet in size and the owner wishes to expand by
312 square feet. This is a very modestly sized project and the owner's effort to preserve the
scale and character of this important historic building is very commendable.
The design has been modified slightly since conceptual review to respond to the concerns
expressed by Staff and the HPC. The conditions made on Sept. 12Ih were as follows:
1. Eliminate the angled wall on the northwest comer of the new addition and delete
one ofthe two dormers that were shown.
2. Maintain a I foot reveal of the existing building walls where the old and new
construction meet.
3. Use a thicker batt than what was used on the earlier additions to the house, or use a
reverse batt. Bring a sample for review. The roofing and siding should be
somewhat different than what is found on the rest of the building.
4. All of the windows on the addition should be double hung, which is the style
appropriate to the period of the historic house.
5. All of the lightwells should have metal grates over them, as opposed to railings that
are visible above grade. "
6. The staircase should be redesigned to be a much smaller element than what is
proposed. It should probably run along the west side of the new construction,
tucked close to the building.. Study snowshed concerns.
7. Any skylights on the addition or other features proposed must be clearly shown on
the plans.
8. Accurately show all proposed lightwells in plan view.
9. The cricket that is needed where snow is piling up and causing leaks needs further
discussion.
Staff finds that these issues have been addressed, with the exception of approving material
samples and the roof cricket. Staff also has a few more issues to bring up. First, the
applicant must be aware that the below grade space that is being created may not be
occupied as a separate living unit, meaning that it cannot have a bathroom and kitchen
facilities. Second, the HPC should discuss whether it is appropriate to use clad windows on
this addition and whether or not it is important to try to align the windows on the main level
2
P34
r'\
f"'\
,
and those in the basement. Third, staff recommends that the entry dormer be cut down in
size so that it protects the entry but is no larger than necessary. The entire addition is, as
discussed on Sept. 12th, wide as compared to the original house and this relationship should
. not be exaggerated. The doors into the addition should reflect the style on the rest of the
building, which may be a paneled door with a half-lite.
Staff has concerns with the design of the roof cricket and recommends that a simpler
element, which does not go so far as to connect the ridgelines, must be detennined.
2. Standard: The proposed development reflects and is consistent with the character
of the neighborhood of the parcel proposed for development.
Staff Response: There are few historic buildings in this immediate vicinity. The
property is special in the sense that it is a very early and unusual structure, and much
about the overall setting of the log cabin is still in place. The small size and sensitive
location of this addition will preserve that char;tcter. Staff finds that this standard is met.
3. Standard: The proposed development enhances or does not detract from the
historic significance of designated historic Structures located on the parcel
proposed for development or on adjacent parcels.' .
Staff Response: Because of the small size of the addition, staff [mds that it does not
diminish one's ability to perceive this building as a modest 19th century home. Staff finds
. that this standard is met.
4. Standard: The proposed development enhances or does:not diminish from the
architectural character or integrity of a designated historic Structure or part
thereof.
Staff Response: The project has been revised so that the architectural character and
integrity of the house are preserved.
RECOMMENDED MOTION
"I move to grant Pinal approval for 205 S. Third Street the east Y:, of Lot G, Lot H, and
Lot I, Block 39, City and Townsite of Aspen, finding that the review standards and the
design guidelines have been met, with the conditions stated in Resolution #_, Series of
2001."
Exhibits:
Resolution #_, Series of200l
A. Staff memo dated October 10, 2001
B. Pinal drawings
P35
3
;~\
"~
RESOLUTION OF THE ASPEN HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION
APPROVING AN APPLICATION FOR FINAL DEVELOPMENT FOR THE
PROPERTY LOCATED AT 205 S. THIRD STREET, THE EAST Yz OF LOT G,
LOT H, AND LOT I, BLOCK 39, CITY AND TOWNSITE OF ASPEN,
COLORADO
PARCEL ID#2735-124-65-003
RESOLUTION NO. _, SERIES OF 2001
WHEREAS, the applicants, Walter and Kitty Sherwin, represented by Mark Conklin and
Steve Danuff, have requested Final Development approval for the property located at 205
S. Third Street, the east Yz of Lot G, Lot H, and Lot I, Block 39, City and Townsite of
Aspen. The property is listed on the "Inventory of Historic Sites and Structures"; and
WHEREAS, all development in an "H," Historic Overlay District or development
involving a historic landmark must meet all four Development Review Standards of
Section 26.72.010(D) of the Aspen Land Use Code in order for HPC to grant approval,
namely:
1. Standard: The proposed development is compatible in general design, massing
and volume, scale and site plan with designated historic structures located on the
parcel and with development on adjacent parcels when the subject site is in a "H,"
Historic Overlay District or is adjacent to an Historic Landmark. For. historic
landmarks where proposed development would extend into front yard, side yard and
rear yard setbacks, extend into the minimum distance between. buildings on the lot,
exceed the allowed floor area by up to five hlllldred (500) square feet, or exceed the
allowed site covered by up to five (5) percent, HPC may grant necessary variances
after making a finding that such variation is more compatible in character with the
historic landmark and the neighborhood than would be development in accord with
dimensional requirements. In no event shall variations pursuant to this Section
exceed those variations allowed llllder Section 26.520.040(B)(2), for detached
accessory dwelling units, and
2. Standard: The proposed development reflects and is consistent with the
character of the neighborhood of the parcel proposed for development.
3. Standard: The proposed development enhances or does not detract from the
historic significance of designated historic structures located on the parcel
proposed for development or on adjacent parcels.
4. Standard: The proposed development enhances or does not diminish from the
architectural character or integrity of a designated historic structure or part
thereof; and
P36
I'"l
~
WHEREAS, Amy Guthrie, in her staff report dated October 10, 2001, performed an
analysis of the application based on the standards, and recommended approval of the
project with conditions; and
WHEREAS, at their regular meeting on October 10, 2001, the Historic Preservation
Commission considered the application, found the application to meet the standards and
to be consistent with the "City of Aspen Historic Preservation Design Guidelines" and
approved the application by a vote of_to _'
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED:
That Final Development for the property located at 205 S. Third Street, the east Y, of Lot
G, Lot H, and Lot I, Block 39, City and Townsite of Aspen be approved with the
following conditions:
I. HPC must approve all exterior material~ e~ .J;oYV
2. The applicant may use clad windo~ the new addition.
3. Align the main floor and basement windows.
4. Reduce the size of the dormer to the minimum necessary to protect the entry.
5. Use exterior doors which are in keeping with the style of the doors found on the
rest of the house (paneled with a half lite.)
6. Redesign the cricket to profile of the existing roof ridgelines.
APPROVED BY THE COMMISSION at its regular meeting on the 10th day of
October, 2001.
Approved as to Form:
David Hoefer, Assistant City Attorney
Approved as to content:
HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION
Suzannah Reid, Chair
ATTEST:
Kathy Strickland, Chief Deputy Clerk
P37
~
r-,
r V\\l
~
-
bj
~
MEMORANDUM
TO:
Aspen Historic Preservation Commission
FROM:
Amy Guthrie, Historic Preservation Officer
RE:
205 S. Third Street- Conceptual, Partial Demolition, PUBLIC HEARING
DATE:
September 12,2001
SUMMARY: This property contains a house historically known as the "Matthew
Callahan Log Cabin." It is a local landmark and is listed on the National Register of
Historic Places.
The owner proposes to make a small addition, which exceeds the size that would classify
the review as "minor." (Please note that the original submittal, which showed an addition
of under 250 square feet was revised as shown in the addendum.)
APPLICANT: Walter and Kitty Sherwin, represented by Mark Conklin and Steve
Danuff.
LOCATION: 205 S. Third Street, the east Y:. of Lot G, Lot H, and Lot I, Block 39, City
and Townsite of Aspen.
PARCEL ID: 2735-124-65-003.
DEVELOPMENT REVIEW STANDARDS
All development in an "H," Historic Overlay District or development involving a historic
landmark must meet all four of the following Development Review Standards, from
Section 26.72.0l0(D) of the Aspen Land Use Code in order for HPC to grant approval.
1. Standard: The proposed development is compatible in general design, massing
and volume, scale and site plan with designated historic structures located on the
parcel and with development on adjacent parcels when the subject site is in a "H,"
Historic Overlay District or is adjacent to an Historic Landmark. For historic
landmarks where proposed development would extend into front yard, side yard and
rear yard setbacks, extend into the minimum distance between buildings on the lot,
exceed the allowed floor area by up to five hundred (500) square feet, or exceed the
allowed site covered by up to five (5) percent, HPC may grant necessary variances
after making a finding that such variation is more compatible in character with the
historic landmark and the neighborhood than would be development in accord with
~
.~
dimensional requirements. In no event shall variations pursuant to this Section
exceed those variations allowed under Section 26.520.040(B)(2), for detached
accessory dwelling units.
Staff Response: The National Register form states that this is the oldest existing hand
hewn log structure left in Aspen and dates its construction at 1885 or earlier. There are two
small wood frame additions that have been made to the original house on the west and south
sides.
The applicant proposes to build on at the southwest comer of the cabin, adjoin earlier
additions to the log building. No dates are available for when those additions were made.
This block is not included on the Sanborne map.
The existing home is about 1,000 square feet in size and the owner wishes to expand by 312
square feet. This is a very modestly sized expansion and the owner's effort to preserve the
scale and character of this important historic building is very commendable.
In terms of the location proposed for the addition, it is appropriate to set it in the back
corner of the structure, where it is not visible to the street and does not change the overall
dimensions of the structure as viewed by the public. The building is able to maintain a
fairly small footprint.
Staff has a number of concerns with the design of the proposal. First, in terms of the plan
form, the angled wall on the northwest comer of the new construction is out of character
with the structure and should probably be revised. The applicant may have proposed it in
response to a staff comment about trying to expose the corners of the existing construction,
but it does not have that effect. There should be some discussion about whether it is
important to reveal the comers of the additions being affected by this work or not.
Staff has some concern with the proportion of the shed addition and the long roofline that is
created by it. The roofing and siding should probably be something other than board and
batten and wood shingles, to set off the addition as more recent construction and not add
more confusion to the evolution of the building. One ofthe relevant design guidelines is:
10.4 Design a new addition to be recognized as a product of its own time.
D An addition should be made distinguishable from the historic building, while also
remaining visually compatible with these earlier features.
D A change in setbacks of the addition from the historic building, a subtle change in
material or a differentiation between historic, and more current styles are all
techniques that may be considered to help define a change from old to new
construction.
2
.
1"""'\
1""\
All of the windows on the addition should be double hung, which is the style appropriate to
the period of the historic house. All of the lightwells should have metal grates over them, as
opposed to railings that are visible above grade.
In regard to the staircase that is proposed along the back of the addition, it should be
redesigned to be a much smaller element than what is proposed. It should probably run
along the west side of the new construction, tucked close to the building. All windows
needed for the basement could be located within the stairwell.
The application mentions an alteration needed on some area of the existing construction, but
the drawing is not clear. There is mention of a desire to place skylights on the addition, but
they are not shown on the drawings. The applicant and the HPC should be sensitive the
requirements for review of a project, as stated in the design guidelines. Although an
architect is not required, all drawings must adequately convey the scale and character of
what is proposed. No features that are proposed to be added or altered can be omitted from
the drawings.
Because of the concerns described above, staff finds that this standard is not met by the
current proposal.
2. Standard: The proposed development reflects and is consistent with the character
of the neighborhood of the parcel proposed for development.
Staff Response: There are few historic buildings in this immediate vicinity. The
property is special in the sense that it is a very early and unusual structure, and much
about the overall setting of the log cabin is still in place. The small size and sensitive
location of this addition will preserve that character. Staff finds that this standard is met.
3. Standard: The proposed development enhances or does not detract from the
historic significance of designated historic structures located on the parcel
proposed for development or on adjacent parcels.
Staff Response: Because of the small size of the addition, staff finds that it does not
diminish one's ability to perceive this building as a modest 19th century home. Staff finds
that this standard is met.
4. Standard: The proposed development enhances or does not diminish from the
architectural character or integrity of a designated historic structure or part
thereof.
Staff Response: Staff has identified some concerns in regard to the integrity of the
structure under "Standard I."
3
~
.~
RECOMMENDATION:
Staff recommends that HPC continue the conceptual review for 205 S. Third Street to a
date certain with the following direction:
1. Eliminate the angled wall on the northwest comer of the new construction
2. HPC should discuss whether it is important to reveal the comers of the existing
additions being affected by this work or not.
3. HPC should discuss the proportion of the shed addition and the long roofline that is
created by it.
4. The roofing and siding should probably be something other than board and batten
and wood shingles, to set off the addition as more recent construction and not add
more confusion to the evolution of the building.
5. All of the windows on the addition should be double hung, which is the style
appropriate to the period of the historic house.
6. All of the lightwells should have metal grates over them, as opposed to railings that
are visible above grade.
7. The staircase should be redesigned to be a much smaller element than what is
proposed. It should probably run along the west side of the new construction,
tucked close to the building. All windows needed for the basement could be located
within the stairwell.
8. Any skylights on the addition or other features proposed must be clearly shown on
the plans.
RECOMMENDED MOTION
"I move to continue the review of 205 S. Third Street to a date certain."
Exhibits:
A. Staff memo dated September 12,2001
B. Application . \
i ~\~VIA\ ~i9'~ ?AA~}~ vJ~\\
d V 0 f y\.O\0 0 VI ~ VjJL..AJ .eJ. -0J atJ" V>
~ V~~ \ \ I f-vo VIA k ~ \A/l C> VI ?o v l/1...e-v
11\ CVI~ \/t..ud S ~ \Sc...U<;SI';i,A
5~\~C\VI~
c\-Vt \C.J.rPY
::, ~~ 01/ V'~~~-0 l:J~) \,aV\V1'\ S~fk----
voonV\') ~ SIc.\\V\) ),\~~\1~.v ~ t/
4 AOU\o\.b >>\'JV) . \J'~~ 4
~:;;:;::1- 0,^O,^,0~"j 1. "'" 'b 1lJ' \'') ~
'-...
/
~
(j
,;:W7'" ~
n
...,~.
1'.'
.
Sherwin Residence Addition
205 S. 3rd Street Aspen Co.
Addendum
Upon a recent visit and site inspection, the property owners have
decided to make a few small chanqes to the addition project.
The first chanqe is to increase the addition buildinq depth from 12'
to 16'. The increase is 80 sq. feet. The total addition size would now be
312 sq. feet.
The owners asked to have the dilapidated shed from the south side
of the buildinq removed. It is not actually attached to the main structure
or its additions. and will not cause any damaqe to any exterior materials.
The main chanqe in this addendum is to the crawl space of the
addition. The owners would like a full basement below the addition. The
space would be used for seasonal storaqe, and to help replace storaqe
lost due to removal of the shed alonq the house. It will also be used to
house the utilities involved in the addition. This chanqe requires an
exterior entrance to the basement. I placed this entrance on the south
side, to prevent roof runoff from enterinq the stairwell, and to facilitate
ease of access. This placement will also allow maximum sunliqht into the
area below. Other window wells are centered at reqular window
openinqs above for symmetry. The stairwell structure is built of treated
landscape timbers, and contains qravel infill for drainaqe. The railinq
desiqn is straiqhtforward. There is no railinq on this buildinq to match or
compare to, and not much in the neiqhborhood in qeneral to compare to
either. We propose a simple railinq of redwood posts, rails and balusters
for around the stairwell.
In conclusion, we feel the addendum chanqes to the proposal are
minimal, and overall do not stronqly affect the character of proiect.
Thank you for your time and attention in reviewinq this proposal.
I
Sincerely,
---. //
,g !,
P'
,."'c/.;...)
.c, '--...
S75"09.Jl1 't
, 'r"'\
'7 30.00'
!~ 0 5 s.
, 15.00'
!
METk
SH~D
/'
/
;/
/
22/
{,?'foc,
"~
WOOD'
SHED
----"
woob
'''11 SHEp
(,
I! -<~-r;t
, }"
~~)U
I
X I x
I
I I WOOD I
I SHED
I -
I ~
C 9184 I G.4 ~
(ND R i
N75"09'11 ''W
,
/
//
//
....
....,
"
25.19'
ONE STORY
WOOD FRAME i
HOUSE I
C) I
I
13.68 'fT1 rrJ
, .
c<~'
.,~ ~~j 75. 00 J
~Jo. 00'
rhild st.
I 0
~ 22 l' 2
lei '<.
~
CJ
CJ
c::)
CJ
........
-
~
'"
-
C)
"-
I
8.90' i
ON
I STORY L G
WOOD F ME
SE
~
6"
J,.(\!"j;j
?(.~)
;'w:...,p
16.61 '
TO 1St; La'
I
aA
~~
" ~
20 Cl)
o ~"'l--
CJ
;0
"'l--
........
V)
" . X8"" . ~,,7"
: .i " 1.\ . i '-J.k,';
,(l ." .
.. . ,'I;>- -oj'"..
~ '. '. oj',"
~ <<9~CRE:tl
,~. .,.
. tl.. ..'^.~.
\(
SE
"-
',. .,.' 7.5.00J
. )t ------"- .
. -,
~
-
..
<..:::i .~
~
.......
\-
<:
~
\,.IJ
~
r:L<
Q
~
.S::
, ;. ; \:::=" . ~
h'l J1.. il i " , ~=:- .
~ 0 \. . Ii !:~~-: ' ,,---~.
''-. Q ",,3': .' rr.
" ()'. Ii !.- "'..\ ~---
[" il ;-:"'"_~+ \:,....... -\ '~.J ~-..
"'. . Ifit~\ ..\ ~~.
~.: ., ,"1=~~:"';7"--=:--~'~~;;-,- . -~=
i :::t.?' i /'(/' ..
'. ( \/ \ \ ==::::::::...-==.:
." -------_.:...::.:.:~:.::~_. .
f""\
I
,
!.f)
f()
)'
".
"
" .".--.+--
j I :("'~"-
i :+:=li:.
,
.~~
e
Q
~
'\'.
-*-
f
I
:6J
';WI~
:I~
Ul W I
~ I
~i
~ILU
21 (::::~
B,_
Z '--.J
(J \U -<C
~ 2. ~
\-,\jJ
al Vl ,
~I~L
1..J8
Q...J ~
\jJ.::Jlt-
V]"'- ~
~41 a
(2 \- I Q
(+. :5 I ,"(
'I,
Ii
I! ,
'--
,
"
'"
~
""""=:'::;:0::::='::::'-3'"'-'
..;..';;""c;=~-. ........____..__
-
I
j
I
!
tiJ
--==-?
I:::
I~
I~
I \ \ I
1=1
IV!
I
I
I
i
I
I
I
I
,
I
I
!
..f--."
/. I i ~
i~! r---j- (i' I~---r: r-, !l,
--I_!- {-+r1+ ~l-- '
I r ! I..l ; --l--U' , ,I II
I: l ~---+i~';1 I
1.- t '111 l" L
I I I " : I I I
Jl r ~J!,-<I"-'I di+
,II I' ,-i" ,,'
+-11 I ~ -t'>U-J, I I : \ I
:::hr'"l\ ~4'j'" \ rl~r~J
1\ Irl;.l'\t.:c 0-~:
- '1\' '" I .
,,-,-",:,',\~!-_I!;
!_,...,......"......1.~ ,:~ I
, ,"-:-,' "",':' ',I Iii
11-':,1 1','-..1_,)" I' I-I' -! ~' ~
f'-J.I ~ 1 \ " I
, 1 !' ,J
I ~--tjl 11-1- I=-~~~~~;
I~l'-i ;! I, [r- ""~'
I~~ '-1'1'{ I \ !-
, , 1......1, ' I J '--->i-----
: I.J 1'\'--.("',' ,'11", I Ii ,~~--==_---I
I~I ' ' ' j' I I' f -- _.
I' Ii ,rJ I,ll ~(~ -
,.1 , \'-..1 'l--,I~
I I I 1,' I _=---J
.;. , I' , 1 I I, - ' -- .
, I ,'i '", 1'----
,_,' ,_-',' I I, 1 --- --
,'- , ' -----
~ ',!_ i ~,'",II r- \ !,. ~. 11
I~"r-i ~,I '[2j ,1",/ 'ri ,: ---- ~
\----'1 1__) ::~ ' I Ii ~
I I! 1--1-- i~
Ikr\ \ -\_.~l, \ -- ,I: I =r ~
,--0 I' I ,', - ^
h,iJ-r/1 \ 'I'Ll ( 'u:
If- ',Ii "I (,j J:
11"_\ --- '\ i I, ~ -lL ....... \ III
'-I, ."",i~\' II i- \ ''-.J
I \ J' .1 ' ~" 1-' ._"~...::;:;;;..
; -l--v-\ ' I .,
. I I \ ._...-'( \ r'" r- .
. ,I ~ :
\
"I
---
, ) ) ,,' )\.\" ]'-*--'--
! \' i ! II'
i \,\ '\\{ \!.
~~>~;\\ \\\1 ----D
-' i J ! ) \ i-or"~ I t
I b "-Y~'01z/*:-L-J, ! \ \' J'"
__ I ~ ~l~~~-- f'~~? .".__,_",.c____
Ti- ~ ~ _.-.-\-~~ ""\'\ ~
pO =- jf-
---,~~ ~ ,/\,
IJ ' --.--~~-- --~\'
--1r i
::cV)
~~
~.
.,
.
\
\
-
\
':-<:------.---.---'
~
V)
o
a
,...j
\10
~-I
I II
, I
0"
'2
-~ ~
~
C1
-w-
Q
Z
"J
~
\iJW
a
j~
<J..\J
~
G'3
'<J ()
._ ......J
2~
_(.'CI
<(
,~ '~
~
~
w
-
'-::::> i:
.
--
\- II
:::' ,
,
~ ,
-Z !
<:)
~ I
, ,
I
I
---::;2
<:::J
F
~
a
~
~
L
-
-:;;
~
:::x::
\J)
~.~ ~ 5 \ii:KW IN QDliiG I\J r'"
v
.
.- -- ~-~-- - - ,-------.
-------~~ ~ ---- - ----- ~
GRAD
------.-...----'^" - w____
I I ~.
- --.----.-- .. -..,.- ...'_',_"'.>>,..u -,.- -, --,..,-.....,
c :/ _I
) I
~
--- - "1
--:~::y-J -_..,---'/ -.--
<41
~b~,7~A~J..A"----
I(~' "'-.'
"1,o,~
,~
RAlL D'ETA1L
j'.( ::- i'
"" .. 0"_ .... .. ." - , _" __"'W"''''_'__~_''~,.__."."._.,~__..._"..._._.._ _"'_"'_~_.._.,..,u".,.______".,.,_."""."".__,.,,._.... .,.....__.'''_._.".. ,,,_,,,, '+_"_"'_""'_."'._._..,...___.,.,__"~_,__~_.....,,.,....._...__............_,.......
(II
\
i
I Lf
[II
I ,
, I
I. ,
I ir- i
,,--~-,~._-JJ-.- .-..",-."''''..__.,....,...._...._. I
,
I
I
,~~\
~_._-~
----- I .,.'-~ J -____
I
I
I
I
,
,
LAP' v'f-rA I L
PA5i27N1JZ S
l'J Cl 'EXPo~€b
JADD.l
~
('I.
,'\
SHERWIN RESIDENCE ADDITIOt'J
205 S. 3rd STREET
ASPEN, COLORADO 81612
CONTRACTOR: CONKLIN CONSTRUCTION
DESIGNER & CONSULTANT: CCRS
STEVE. A" DAN U I-F
..----...-....""".'....-......-....".-.."'...-...-..-....'"....--.........
.,.-~._.----.."...".
.
,....",
tl
To whom it may concern;
The intent of this letter is to fulfill the qeneral submission
requirements for an Aspen Historic Preservation Commission, minor
development review, attachment 3, items 1 thru 7.
1. Applicant: Mark Conklin/Conklin Construction
POB 247 Basalt Co 81621
970 948 2247
Authorized Representative:
Steve A. Danuff
POB 1926 Basalt Co 81621
9703793931
2. Address: 205 S. Third St. Aspen
Leqal Description:
Lots I, H, and e. Yz lot G, block 39
Parcelld. # 2735-124-65-003
3. Enclosed
4. Enclosed
5. Enclosed
6. Portions enclosed
7. Enclosed
Thank you,
f
~
f'i
I)
ATTACHMENT 1
LAND USE APPLICATION FORM
1. Project name S f.I~ UJ ~I'\I A ~ ~I ~I 0 ~
2. Project location :J. 0 S 5.. i:d Cst '. ''is. er-.. C{) 8 110 I \
lots e..Y1-G; HI r t)L-OC K 3~
(indicate street address, lot and block number or metes and bounds description)
~AgcEL I D:fI' 2.7315 -, 2-4 -b~ -003 .
3. Present zoning 'JZ,. - I 5 4. Lot size "7 S D () ~6i FT
5. Applicant's name, address and phone number Go N KLI N Colllfi:/W Gl J b~
""P:.A"'iAL, (6 ~Lft\ -2.:L~'7
6. Representative's name, address, and phone number S1-Ei!c- VANUFF
4>.0,(5, 1~'l.6 'YJAsAL-{ (0 Y7~ - 393J
7. Type of application (check all that apply):
Conditional Use
Special Review
8040 Greenline
Stream Margin
Subdivision
GMQS allotment
View Plane
Lot Split/Lot Line
Adjustment
Conceptual SPA
Final SPA
Conceptual PUD ~
Final PUD
Text/Map Amend.
GMQS exemption
Condominiumization_
Conceptual HPC
Final HPC
Minor HPC
Relocation HPC
Historic Landmark
Demo/Partial Demo
, Design Review
Appeal Committee
8. Description of existing uses (number and type of existing structures,
approximate sq. ft., number of bedrooms, any previous approvals granted to the, /,
property) ^ rIl At Ai t4 D /J S /( /I.-rflAY;-1 U Ii( 1=: - 3 13 E1) RC)il I''f'S I 0 tJ e-13 ({f H
AP~X.' lobo ~~ t---T
S"'~L Q~HE:K sUr'~uILDiN~f
A C...G_ArL/- 'BGDC._ 25 5~'T
~, .
9. Description of development application A 0 D A
-:p;, kT /-l, !?-.OC\i'Y) 4( f"t\lIV\ j LIt R <;::) 0 \':11\
10. Have you completed and attached the following?
vi Attachment 1- Land use application form
_ Attachment 2- Dimensional requirements form
Response to Attachment 3
Response to Attachment 4
~
I""'.
lc f
f1
ATTACHMENT 2
DIMENSIONAL REQUIREMENTS FORM
Applicant: c...ONKWN (',ONo1~\./LlliJN/ s.,t~\rS D/lNUF-F
Address: ')..0 r:.. S . '~f.lJl A<;'Pf-'N <:....c (
Zone district: 'R,. t '5
Lot size: 75 DC) SQ IT
Existing FAR: 1000 P12--Jl.Jcif.p.L 137...:;- -f'o-,'A'-
Allowable FAR: :3 "'\ 5-0 ' '
Proposed FAR: 1'2-32.. :P:RINCI'~'Al.. 1557 ,o-,AL
Existing net leasable (commercial): ~.r/
Proposed net leasable (commercial): ~ 0
Existing % of site coverage: 13 a ,,~ - 18. ~ "i": 7Cr1A I..
Proposed % of site coverage: :1, J "Jr, " "/
Existing % of open space: 'l3ov 62
Proposed % of open space: 79 "/., "
Existing maximum height: Princi Acceso
Proposed max. height: Princi al bid : Accesso
Proposed % of demolition: IE. S' 5 --ri-l A t..J (, &oJ,;
Existing number of bedrooms: 33 '
Proposed number of bedrooms: ~_
Existing on-site parking spaces: 2
On-site parking spaces required: 0
Setbacks
Existing:
Front: :;:'i
Rear: L./ 0
Combined
Front/rear:
Side: 1;:-
Side: Lii
Combined
Sides:
Minimum required:
Front:
Rear:
Combined
Front/rear:
Side:
Side:
Combined
Sides:
Proposed:
Front: 8
Rear: 3 b
Combined
Front/rear:
Side: i 2-
Side: .t{ 7
Combined
Sides:
Existing nonconformities or encroachments:
/Nc/PAL L "
0,,-/ AC--C-~R...,'-1 '-e.<..-.D .
Variations requested: Na IV 15:. E.<<( C-Lu D ,rJG, e~ 1!Y-f iNti
(HPC has the ability to vary the following requirements: setbacks, distance between buildings,
FAR bonus of up to 500 sq.ft, site coverage varianc,. up to 5%, height variations under the
cottage infill program, parking waivers for residential uses in the R-6, R-15, RMF, CC, and 0 zone
districts)
~
~
~
Commitment for Title Insurance
Fidelity National TItle Insurance Company
A Stock Company
COMMITMENT FOR TITLE INSURANCE
FIDELITY NA TIONAL TITLE INSURANCE COM PANY, a Corporation, herein called the Company, for valuable
consideration, hereby commits to issue its policy or policies of title insurance, as identified in Schedule A, in favor
of the proposed insured named in Schedule A, as owner or mortgagee of the estate or interest covered hereby in
the land described or referred to in Schedule A, upon payment of the premiums and charges therefore; all subject
to the provisions of Schedules A and B and to the Conditions and Stipulations hereof.
This Commitment shall be effective only when the identity of the proposed Insured and the amount of the
policy or policies committed for have been inserted in Schedule A hereof by the Company, either at the time of
the issuance of this Commitment or by subsequent endorsement.
This Commitment is preliminary to the issuance of such policy or policies of title insurance and all liability and
obligations hereunder shall cease and lerminate six (6) months after the effective dale hereof or when the policy
or policies committed for shall issue, whichever first occurs, provided that the failure to issue such policy or
policies is not the fault of the Company. This Commitment shall not be valid or binding until countersigned by an
authorized officer or agent.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Company has caused this Commitment to be signed and sealed, to become valid
when countersigned by an authorized officer or agent of the Company, all in accordance with its By-Laws. This
Commitment is effective as of the date shown in Schedule A as "Effective Date."
Pitkin County Tide, Inc.
601 E. Hopkins Ave. 3rd Floor
Aspen, CQlorado 81611
970-925-1766/970-925-6527 Fax
FidelityNationalTit/elnsuranceCompany
BY ~/ff (
Countersigned
~
ATTEST
~'e:~~~=k~'~'re~
President
FORM 27 ~83-66 (9/94)
ALTA COMMITMENT -1966
Valid Only if Schedule A and B are Attached
The conditions of this commitment require that the premium and charges be paid prior to the issuance of the title policy(s). Therefore, no policy(s) will be issued
until the charges have been remiUed to the issuing agent.
~
I""',
I""',
COMMITMENT FOR TITLE INSURANCE
SCHEDULE A
1. Effective Date: May 1, 2001 at 8:00 AM
Case No. PCT16069
2. Policy or Policies to be issued:
(a) AL TA Owner's Policy-Form 1992
Proposed Insured:
Amount$ 0.00
Premium$ 0.00
Rate:
(b) AL TA Loan Policy-Form 1992
Proposed Insured:
Amount$ 0.00
Premium$ 0.00
Rate:
Tax Certificate: $10.00
3. Title to the FEE SIMPLE estate or interest in the land described or referred to in this Commitment is at the
effective date hereof vested in:
WALTER J, SHERWIN and KITTY P. SHERWIN and MARK SHERWIN and JENNIFER EVE SHERWIN
4. The land referred to in this Commitment is situated in the County of State of COLORADO and is described
as follows:
LOTS H AND I, AND THE EAST 1/2 OF LOT G,
BLOCK 39,
CITY AND TOWNSITE OF ASPEN
PITKIN COUNTY TITLE, INC.
601 E. HOPKINS
ASPEN, CO, 81611
970-925-1766
970-925-6527 FAX
AUTHORIZED AGENT
Schedule A-PG.1
This Commitment is invalid
unless the Insuring
Provisions and Schedules
A and B are attached.
~
i')
S~f<WIN ADDli}uN
205 S. 3.c{
Vicinity Map (Not to Scale)
....,
(!)
~
~
:s
~
QOhT_'
~4.7./)S St
75.10' (Reid)
77.65' (Record)
i
i
i
H i ....,
(!)
iI ~
,
! ~
/
, ~
i
C\;j
-",S75"Q~11 'i'
"' !c;
"'/ 30.00'
..
i
/205 S@
/
./
4'
15. 00 '
i
I
METAL
SH~D
/
,
1//
//
/
/
/
/
2"
2/
I'''":e',
. / \,
~'I(l!
,
\
\
("'<'''-
r>) <J 75. 00'
/30.00 '
, /
Thl?rd St@
'------j
,
;
22. 41'
SH<f:RWI/'J ADDITION
WOOfo 8. 90' ,
SH ~ ONE STORY LOG
l!) A~D WOOD FRAME
~ HQUSE
i _' ~ .
-
(! <::J
.:Jde Plon .~.
~
'"
._..~"
\
I
I
WOO'D
-,1 SHED
//'. v I
/1
If! ~.- 1;,/'/ ,/ i/
t" -",\1,Y' / ",1 ", /
III ii' I." ... i I ...
,\ ilJ / // I /
~:\,/'.'-I /1,//,:
'--- ,WPODi
// '/D)::'CK'
//' '/i /i/ .I
/ ,.1 l ... !
/ / .I I .I /
/ J / /
/ / I ,
/ "
/
//
~
~
I
X______...... I
~~
I r..
,~ /'l'\ \
~ /,''l,
i ~71/Ii\\)>
I i /
, ,
. ,
L_.><
x
x
@
x
J
I WOOD I
SHED ,
~
G..!~
RC 9184
(NO
N75"09'11 ''w
4"
1_
[ "\
\i
,,,,,>ill'
2"
1~
f ).
_it
/
/
/
/
./
"
,
'.
25.19'
ONE STORY i
WOOD FRAME I
HOUSE i
13.68 '00 [g
-
<::J
"--
lC'j
C\J
~
CJ
CJ
c::)
CJ
"-
"
6
.,,;:-"'j:~
'~:,~G2
-f;-'4'h.1
,..;(,t'f.J.,...J..,.'." , ,_,''.:
OR ~}'/..~(>",.:'),..t,:,:~:<ij -~<>"\".(..,
(LO '\..........).-,.\-/.."..(, J I
SH [., ,--.-\.. , , \ .
(INI NTRANC ,,(!(>.:"))/).!;~
- [ 61 ""'~' ,.,. ,
'" AT 001. -, ,./\<....).'..ri.'
: ) 1'. ""G"'~,,~~ :)'\..~ .f'')
f'r) [L[V - . ".", . "'-",-.,'---J',.! ; '-,
. ,'!{ /' "'I'~;" I r--.....'/ t"~)..i [
r--: ,'I, '.'-r'...!."!'.""."'("" \"". , ,\....
'-.) i!"W' }~) 'T',.., .
C\J Iii "'.<> <'. ,y \./
II: r"',1~,-J ~'" ,;-''''(,,,}
ill 2,,;>~\-< ~ ,-<~.<',~::~'c'
fl' ,,\....1 )"'li:(' -..,.I)-,,!
."j!f,- (>.:<~:,t.>\.~<).}
\ .J.".....~.-\_. (' _'r. ":r") 2 "
-",' ~'-'",,-\ l',,,, 1
I'""\..{,)"'(', ,....-_",,!
. ,
~"..ff
SHED 16.61'
,
~
,
,.
I,
I \
, I
, /
i/
V
"'.L
C"'I)
(~-'::~)i
y.-....... :
i
I
EM
-
c::,
'-0
11.43'
"
11
........~\
\ .~
'~....,~!l
14"
r"
f J
'.~,&ii
.,
.,.x~.. "
.' . '., '---'\7
. ,'1' .: 2, ' ~ """"Ji
.. "" .
~ "'il-, '~':.' '.,:..,
~ '~'~,~CRE~ET
,.q ,:" .", ,\"
. ",. ,'P"
x~. 75.00'
/1
~~
" ~
2,Q 0)
/', 'N-
{ ,Ii ...'\1-
\"".'''~''~' C:J
~
"t-
"-
V)
d
\()
l/1
~
~
-
Z-
P-
C::::)
D
---
:j
t>
~.
~
t""'\
~
'I~
~
'J
:.I.Q
/' ~)
<-.' U,
11\\t\
Z\J
....-:
-'-,-~..---~_._.-
\ \
5'-.\-\'.)
',.,
," fu
" \\
_.__:::--:--=:-:....- \
\
------ . ---...-\ \
--_.. .----...-"---. ....-. \ \
- \
=---:-=;---.---:-C....-..-.-LC \
-.-.........,- \
. .~-=~;-~,,=,~~ .... "\
.J'~ ;'\ -:=:..~:~:~:~~
)>
v
C5
-t
C:J
~ C
~ .
~~
C. ''',I I
" I.:'
-' vII, ~
"
Lj\ C::J r
~~ t:
L7t
/',
:~)
:----..,--
c..
~~
~ .
~
c.
o
. :~,~,._...
It
oJ
l
V
[\
-'-1
i
-.~'\
\
['
',~.;
~=;;::::-..::~:::~
----
--".
~'
?
--P'
i
_,.~il
, 7/
....-.-,.-..==-,.,,) jf '.
i
/
/
\'
I
\,--.1
/
,..)
.~~;::~ )
"....-:;::;;.;:::O=7::::,:~~C;:::';:__
/
/
.'
/
.'
/
//
I
lj\
~
~-
2:-
~
--".. ,
L-,"I
:h. I
l......:7
V
=;
C
Z--
I
I'
I
i
I
I
I
I
.
~
..._...~
".". ~"":'-
- . =1 v1/'D1~ ':
.cC:: .. .-=0-<;1
_"U .:----
z::
p'\
2
----.:.:;:" .
",
';1J
a
o
Ti'
i-==-'--~
c- ,,-U
1--- -
~ ~ -
,-,-.~
,
, '
:.~~~_J. ~ j
~~j~ kJ /." C)",:' ",
,,__, ., ,,': I""'" 9
_ I ii "'--.-, i I ''---!..
I j!
I lit
~:'.-=-I'
-,-
"--=-.:::.:"..-....
L-I I
:r:' I
[II I
'(1 '/
Ii f ;
'" I
I '.._, I
I /'
\../
,~
!
-..,,\
f""\
pi
Ill'
'*
, '
.. ,
,
i
. j / ..
, /
~
~
t:-
o
~
IY
D
.i1'
"""j
; -l.
.*
~
f"'1
r'\
Sherwin AdditiQn ProPQsal
The primary reaSQn fQr this additiQn is to. add a bathroQm to. the
hQuse to. help meet the needs Qf a qrQwinq family. The rest Qf the small
additiQn is to. be a family roQm, and will also. cQntain an enclQsed
washer/dryer c1Qset, as well as a mudroQm by the dQQr. A flQQr hatch in
this area will prQvide access to. the crawl space belQw.
The new rQQfline Qn the additiQn will also. serve to. prevent damaqe
to. the existinq wall structure Qn the west side, by mQvinq water away.
Also needed to. prevent further problems, is a small (under 1 5sq.ft) rQQf
renQvatiQn between the two. peaks, as nQted by the asterisks in the
drawinqs.
The Qldest part Qf the buildinq is truly a classic loq structure which
will nQt be impacted by the prQPQsed additiQn. The existinq additiQns are
Qf their own era, and style. The prQPQsed additiQn is nQt visible frQm
directly Qut front, the classic view as shQwn in the quidelines pamphlet Qn
paqe 26. The rQQf restoratiQn proPQsed will nQt be visible frQm here
either.
The vertical bQard and batten sidinq used Qn all the existinq Qlder
additiQns to. the buildinq as well as Qutbuildinqs will be matched in
desiqn. Usinq SQme different width back bQards will help match the
eXistinq asymmetrical pattern, and a wide tQP trim detail will also. match.
With usinq rouqh sawn western red cedar, I hQPe to. match eXistinq
material texture. By usinq it in its current as---milled dimensiQns as the
batten bQards I hQPe to. subtlety distinquish the new buildinq sectiQn
from the Qld. The existinq battens are apprQximately 7/16" thick, and
averaqe 2 %" wide. New material is 11 /16" thick, by 3 14" wide.
The SQuth wall and rQQfline are visible frQm Third St. near the alley,
so. the rQQf Qverhanq details and Qther rQQf dimensiQninq will c1Qsely
match the eXistinq Qn that face. The new rQQf slQpe will be considerably
less than the eXistinq rQQf it adiQins, and will appear as the classic shed
rQQf additiQn. RQQfinq shinqles Qf cedar to. match existinq will be used.
As the rQQf is unseen. they will be left to. match existinq naturally. The
rQQf Qverhanq Qn the west side is IQnqer than the rest fQr bOoth the reaSQn
Qf practicality, and to. distinquish between buildinqs. The qable rQQf
entry prQtectQr ties into. the feel Qf the existinq west face.
All windQws will be WQQd frame. The windQws Qn the SQuth side are
a dQuble Qr sinqle hunq type, and will be c1Qse to. the 2 to. 1 prQPQrtiQns
apprQpriate to. the style. WindQws in the back wall are nQt as
architecturally siqnificant so. they will be similarly prQPQrtiQned, but as
larqe as can be manaqed. A small 2 to. 1 type prQPQrtiQned fixed windQw
with an arched tQP is planned fQr the small 45 deqree wall.
~
f"""'\
,
r'I
. ,,,
Skyliqhts in the new roof, if allowed by qlass area ratios, have no
visual impact from any public area. The new exterior door should match
eXistinq doors in wood type qlass area. and finish. EXistinq screen door
details should be applied as well.
Overall, this is a small, tucked in the back addition. I believe there
is minimal visual impact, especially from public areas. It will be
consistent enouqh with existinq additions so as not to be an eyesore, but'
just different enouqh to be noticeably added on. It will in no way alter or
obscure the oriqinalloq structure.
~.~~
~~>
ro ~
(/lEV'
~"*
~.~
--J..t)t
f)~
~is
~~
-i2:-
OH
ZJ.
'-h---....-... 'v~ -~_
~
l-
I
, ,
!
'.,..-'---------- .
-- '---.-"'--'~"-' -....----./-
Ii ,fit
IX
'(11 -
~o i (f~
. 1'-
m:z
I i C)
ki .
rl./,}
1<::, () ,
H .
i {}
11 mf
t;! 14;
I !
r :
I '
I .
I
,
~ i 1
f--L ·
! I
D
"i
"~'--:::::,;:,-,:::--::,':"",r::: ".-,
i
)\J
. -)
..1.
- f-'
"--'1 f
I, :
0_'.- ! '. ;l(.,
' :$. : ...0.}
'. ....l-"" JV
I r::::-;t
Q Dl( ~ ~
J--~ .~~
,~ ,
. ---'--::
r'~fr~_]
. ..... '"---'-'--... .
r=;~D
['~l~~hj1 '
. ..I-_..___.._._____._.w,".,.".,_,.
.."-~,........~-_.....,_.,--......._'-_._----.~-.,,' '.'''' 'I.t
........,.~ "- ....... '" .. -"-"--~- -.--_._~"'.,..-"--~ . ,
ct.e:::: \J\
Ci.\ fI'I l1\
___" ~ (Tt
~
r
,
"------'
Lf1
~
[
-
Z-
J-
(,:::1
C?
-
-i
c
7'
tj)
'1"
('\
(\
!~
-
17\
~.
~
l?'f
\,)J
,
o
i
.
!
,
I
I
.__c..:--.::..
! i
.bl I
m I
b i
IE. CF i
~ I'r
~ I I
i \ i
~~~
i-p I ~
~ : i'
~'4i "
< ~
'. .". . ~
E -I
:..... 'f
,~ ~
,1:::1
o
E
E-
M
r
EA
I
~
}
f
!.
I
I
\
I
I
I
,
I
"" --- - - ,,- --. ,- - -- ....,..
~
~
---
L
s;>
_I
3.
-
C'
L;
r
fi\
,\ -
;\ 1
\\ t!
~ \, (j
" \ ,."
'i t'V
\ ;0-
r\ ~ / ~
~I\\_.S W' 0
<! ' [-)
....:; 'I ~-
Pi: .\ <"\}
I ~' ~\~I\ ~
-. - \ (\Jl
. zi t-J: \'
f"! \
I
/
/f/
. -~'--_._---
. 'Y1 i
. .. . I
... '__"__"""'_ _ \J
......----~
I
PJ
U
:t:
M
V'\)
~
~
z.
(/\
-1
.~
tb-
p
D
,-
,~
-
o
,-,..
<--
(j)
'......
v
l1r\
<.::..
t'if\
.. I
,~"
f"'\
,: ....:/
~
CCRS
CONSTRUCTION CONSULTATION & RELATED SERVICES
STEVE A. DANUFF 970-379-3931
P.O. Box 1926 BASALT Co 81621
Sherwin Addition
205 s. 3rd st.
Aspen Co 81611
Attn: HPC staff re: resolution no. 47
To whom it may concern;
This letter is intended to convey that all conditions of approval for this project
are known and understood by the contractor and his representatives. We also
understand that a meeting with the historic preservation officer must be held, and
that a specialty license in historic preservation must be obtained by the contractor or
superintendent prior to obtaining a building permit.
Thank you,
r--,
County of Pitkin
}
}
}
55.
State of Colorado
I, ~W 19 <;
.-.
'. -"if
AFFIDAVIT OF NOTICE PURSUANT
TO ASPEN LAND USE REGULATIONS
SECTION 26.304.060(E)
L I \~JT
, being or representing an
Applicant to the City of Aspen, personally certify that I have complied with the public notice
requirements pursuant to Section 26.304.060(E) of the Aspen Municipal Code in the following
manner:
I. By mailing of notice, a copy of which is attached hereto, by first-class postage prepaid U.S.
Mail to all owners of property within three hundred (300) feet of the subject property, as indicated
on the attached list, on the _ day of ,200_ (which is _ days prior to the public
hearing date of
).
2. By posting a sign in a conspicuous place on the subject property (as it could be seen from
the nearest public way) and that the said sign was posted and visible continuously from the _ day
of
, 200 , to the 'dav of
- -.
,200_. (Must be posted for at least
ten (10) full days before the hearing date). A photograph of the posted sign is attached hereto.
V3, {)u.,b/:5h('V\!!J 1/1 Of-, 'CQ..
""firt5TIc~~ .l'%i>i' [:ill ---r:-'it
(A tt<:l"'t..' ,~;; l'tlI3tfc ET ctNCEPTUAL HpC
~-'--'..-"'=>~T1lIROSTRE' N
""": ow::. :::.. OEMOLlTIO
REVIEW &15 PHARTIALEREBy GIVEN that a pubn~ h2.a2~~
NOTICE d September 1 ,
Will be held ~n_Jled~ ayS.OO p.m. before the,
at a meeting to oegin a;v~tton CommfsSlon,
ASpen Historic Pr~:e Hall 130'S. Gale~a St..
Council Cnanit~~r~f ~ ~'pplic~tiOn submitted b~
ASpen, to cbnslde a 're uesUng Conceptu
Walter and 12~tyd Sp~~~:~eriolitlon"ap'provaIThfO'
HPC reVieW.... ~tfilg'i'esidence. e
a small a<tO!.Hon ~~ t~e:l6e EaSt ha\12rpt Gf
property IS aesc I e 39 Ctty'and Townsite ?
Lots H and I, Block , " ~
As eri"""'-'~~" \ " ' 'ct Amy Guttirle at
, ~lu~er hlf()rm.lllIOn, cont~" , ,', DevelOpment
F9,"~Xs""'~llPltkln 'C:o!n,m~n!ty "',, ,"" ",CO (910)
th~;';""'!::t' 130'S: care!la,~~~,' '~~:~:c,"~.,,-;;,,-~
';pep.a~96'-arriyg@c1~asP'en,co:~~~,,", ahRetdChalr
~~'~~\"y,,},,: ',F!;':' i'4'}}:::'r.: :'-, s/suzanjP""C"ni.niiSsion
"~: \'~'-"'>'\"'~'il'st6ric preservat on,o,,,,,,"",, 25
:,;_');'A$pen n, ,"'" 'TImes on AuguS , '
:"puolisned In ,t~~~'!:Jen",
20fi1. (76420)
Signature~~
Signed before me this _ day of
200_. by
WITNESS MY HAND Al'ID OFFICIAL SEAL
My Commission expires:
Notary Public
,.
~
o
"
ASPEN/PlTKIN
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT
A
CITY OF ASPEN (hereinafter CITY) and 'S. "'T~ A
(hereinafter APPLICANT) AGREE AS FOLLOWS:
() AN uPfZ--
I.
APPLICANT has submitted to CITY an application fON
S U ~vd J TV PI J} b 'rI '0
(hereinafter, TIl:E PROJECT).
2. APPLICANT understands and agrees that City of Aspen Ordinance No. 45 (Series of 1999)
establishes a fee structure for Land Use applications and the payment of all processing fees is a condition precedent
to a determination of application completeness.
3. APPLICANT and CITY agree that because of the size. nature or scope of the proposed project, it
is not possible at this time to ascertain the full extent of the costs involved in processing the application.
APPLICANT and CITY further agree thar it is in the interest of the parties that APPLICANT make payment of an
initial deposit and to thereafter permit additional costs to be billed to APPLICANT on a monthly basis.
APPLICANT agrees additional costs may accrue following their hearings and/or approvals. APPLICANT agrees he
will be benefited by reraining greater cash liquidity and will make additional paYments upon notification by the
CITY when they are necessary as costs are incurred. CrTY agrees it will be benefited through the greater certainty
of recovering its full costs to process APPLICANTS application.
4. CrTY and APPLIC.>'::-;T further agree that it is impracticable for CrTY staff to complete
processing or present sufficient information to the Planning Commission and/or City Council to enable the Planning
Commission and/or City Council to make legally required findings for project Consideration. unless currem billings
are paid in full prior to decision.
5. Therefore, APPLICANT agrees that in consideration of the CrTY's waiver of its right to collect
full fees prior to a. determination of application compiereness, APPLICANT shall pay an initial deposit in the
amOUnt of S C;"C> 0 which is for 2-, '7 hours of Community Development staff time. and if actual
recorded COSts exceed ,he initial deposit, APPLICANT shall pay additional monthly biilings to CITY to reimburse
the CITY for the processing of the application mentioned above, including post approval review. Such periodic
payments shaH be made within 30 days of the billing date. APPLICANT further agrees that failure to pay such
accrued costs shall be grounds for suspension of processing, and in no case wiil building permits be issued until all
costs associated with case processing have been paid.
CITY OF ASPEN
APPLICANT
?(/c- ...4
Julie Ann Woods
Community Development Director
By:
Date:
Mailing Address:
'R 0 > ~ Ox.
'B..,t1$ALer
I '1 2..---6
('...0 e ) ~2-1
g:\support\forms\agrpa yas.doc
12/2i/99
,......,
~
AFFIDA VII OF PUBLIC NOTICE
REQUIRED BY SECTION 26.304.060 (E), ASPEN LAND USE CODE
ADDRESS OF PROPERTY:
7(:)::; -.c;, JY11\jrJ 51,Aspen,co
folo ID! ,200_
I
SCHEDULED PUBLIC HEARING DATE:
STATE OF COLORADO )
) ss.
County of Pitkin )
I, ~ 1/1 A ..Q /~ L, \/../\ l'J +- (name, please print)
being or representing an Applicant to the City of Aspen, Colorado, hereby personally
certify that I have complied with the public notice requirements of Section 26.304.060
(E) of the Aspen Land Use Code in the following manner: " .
KPublication of notice: By the publication in the legal notice se~~~n ~~an'official:
paper or a paper of general circulation in the City of Aspen at least fifteen (15)
days prior to the public hearing. A copy of the publication is attached hereto.
_ Posting of notice: By posting of notice, which form was obtained from the
Community Development Department, which was made of suitable,
waterproof materials, which was not less than twenty-two (22) inches wide
and twenty-six (26) inches high, and which was composed of letters not
less than one inch in height. Said notice was posted at least ten (10) days
prior to the public hearing and was continuously visible from the _ day of
,200_, to and including the date and time ofthe public
hearing. A photograph of the posted notice (sign) is attached hereto.
_ Mailing of notice. By the mailing of a notice obtained from the Community
Development Department, which contains the information described in Section
26.304.060(E)(2) of the Aspen Land Use Code.' At least ten (10) days prior to the
public hearing, notice was hand delivered or mailed by first class, postage prepaid
U.S. mail to all owners of property within three hundred (300) feet of the property
subject to the development application, and, at least fifteen (15) days prior to the
public hearing, notice was hand delivered or mailed by first class postage prepaid
U.S. mail to any federal agency, state, county, municipal govemment, school,
service district or other governmental or quasi-governmental agency that owns
property within three hundred (300) feet of the property subject to the
development application. The names and addresses of property owners shall be
those on the current tax records of Pitkin County as they appeared no more than
sixty (60) days prior to the date ofthe public hearing. A. copy of the owners and
governmental agencies so noticed is attached hereto.
(continued on next page)
.~
,r'\
Rezoning or text amendment. Whenever the official zoning district map is in
any way to be changed or amended incidental to or as part of a general revision
of this Title, or whenever the text of this Title is to be amended, whether such
revision be made by repeal of this Title and enactment of a new land use
regulation, or otherwise, the requirement ofan accurate survey map or other
sufficient legal description of, and the notice to and listing of names and
addresses of owners of real property in the area of the proposed change shall
be waived. However, the proposed zoning map has been available for public
inspection in the planning agency during all business hours for fifteen (15) days
prior to the public hearing on such amendments.
~~~
S' ature .
The foregoing "Affidavit of Notice" was acknowledged before me this _ day
of , 200__, by
WITNESS MY HAND AND OFFICIAL SEAL
My commission expires:
Notary Public
.........,"'..,.'.."~_~T~'"
j"" -'"",,~'->-~- ~''''-'-[!tJ~'''~''''~~';~'''J;'''~;:'~~ ';":: ::~ ,"i',""~,'~J,:ir:i:;::;;~:~~
'........::: - .t'....... " .. ',- ...',......:<:..:..:-:...... .... -,.. .. .. '~,'''~
.
O..,~j',:~"''";~:.~'7:v:~~-:~_,. .'L,',-:',:' ~~~,,,.;,,,,,,~.;.,,,,;,~,..,~,~~,:,", ::','
PUBLIC NOTICE . ","~
RE: Z05 s. TIDRD STREET::" f'iNA:L-lIPclffiVIEW" , . .."
NOTICE IS HEREBY' GIVEN th~~ '~.. ubl'Ch .,' ."..'ll'b~~;l'ir"l..I'\~'d"':"'-"',p;;
.. ,,".... ' , ,'. " .... _ ,.......'._"'~'_.. P I eanng WI e _ _ e.. .. on ~,.e..tI.l!:\:s.. ay,
October 10, 2001 ;1t a l!1eetmg:t9 begin at 5:00 p.m. before,tl)e,;\spen Historic_'
Pres~rvation C'?'Pm~ssion, C~uncil Chaw,l:>~[~' S:;it):'I-tal1, 130 S. Galena St., Aspen, to .
consider an applicatIOn sublU\tte~_by Walter and Kitty Sherwin requesting Final HPC
review f()r.~sm,a1!,:id4iti()n1'?,!!'e ex~stingresi~ence. The pr~perty fs describedll8..m,e:,;,
~asth!!1!..pf~~19, b.qt~ !l~<;lJ-:"B~ 39, City and Towns\te qf Aspen. FQr_~f!lij:r~,
mfonnatton,contact Amy GUthrie af the Asperi/Pitkin COln\ll\~1'ity Development .,
Department,)30 S. Gal"naSt" Aspen, CO (970) 920-5096, amv~@Ci.aspen.co.us.
..' ~". ",.\,,;:;..,",y,. <. .'. s/Suzann;ili Reid,
..w.:': (::hair Aspen Historic Preservation C~nn!llission
. :'~., ':, "::.,;,:,,::,,. "":',":,'_": :: "';__ ," ' _;,,>, ":/:_.' :':>~:''';:'''',,}1''',:"'':;,~'~;',;:
Published in The,Aspen Tii:Oeson September 22, 20'01. -
THE CITY OF ASI'EN