The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink Aboutresolution.apz.009-2023RECEPTION#: 700105, R: $73.00, D: $0.00 DOC CODE: RESOLUTION Pg 1 of 13, 01/24/2024 at 08:33:43 AM Ingrid K. Grueter, Pitkin County, CO RESOLUTION #09 SERIES OF 2023 A RESOLUTION OF THE ASPEN PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION GRANTING APPROVAL FOR HALLAM LAKE BLUFF REVIEW AND RESIDENTIAL DESIGN STANDARD VARIATIONS FOR THE PROPERTY LOCATED AT 360 LAKE AVE., LEGALLY DESCRIBED AS ERDMAN PARTNERSHIP LOT SPLIT, LOT:1, COUNTY OF PITKIN, STATE OF COLORADO PARCEL ID: 2735-121-32-001 WHEREAS, the Community Development department received an application from BendonAdams, representing Lake Avenue Partners LLC; 690 S. Paytonville Ave.; Southlake, TX 76092, requesting Hallam Lake Bluff Review and Residential Design Standard Variation reviews related to a proposed single-family residence development located at 360 Lake Avenue; and, WHEREAS, the property is located in the Medium Density Residential (R-6) zone district; and, WHEREAS, the Community Development department Staff reviewed the application for compliance with the applicable review standards; and, WHEREAS, upon review of the application and the Land Use Code standards, and referral of the application to other City Departments for comments, the Community Development Director recommended partial approval of the requested development application; and, WHEREAS, the City of Aspen Planning and Zoning Commission reviewed and considered the application under the applicable provisions of the Land Use Code as identified herein, in particular sections 26.435.060 — Hallam Lake Bluff and 26.410.020.0 — Residential Design Standard Variations, considered the recommendation of the Community Development Director and took and considered public comment at a duly noticed public hearing on October 17th, 2023, which was continued to a public hearing on November 21 st, 2023; and, WHEREAS, the City of Aspen Planning and Zoning Commission finds that the development proposal for Hallam Lake Bluff Review and Residential Design Standard Variations meets the applicable review criteria and that approval of the request as described below is consistent with the goals and objectives of the Land Use Code; and, WHEREAS, the City of Aspen Planning and Zoning Commission finds that this Resolution furthers and is necessary for the promotion of public health, safety, and welfare, and, WHEREAS, the City of Aspen Planning and Zoning Commission approves Resolution #09, Series of 2023, by a seven to zero (7 - 0) vote, approving the requested land use reviews as identified herein. P&Z Resolution #09, Series of 2023 1 NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED the City of Aspen Planning and Zoning Commission finds as follows: Section 1: Hallam Lake Bluff Review Pursuant to the procedures and standards set forth in Title 26 of the Aspen Municipal Code, the Planning and Zoning Commission hereby approves a Hallam Lake Bluff Review for development within the Hallam Lake Bluff Review Area as depicted in Exhibit A. The Parks and Engineering, and Zoning Departments recommended conditions of approval regarding the Hallam Lake Bluff Review that must be met prior to or at building permit issuance are described in Section 3. Section 2: Residential Design Standard Variations and Approval Pursuant to the procedures and standards set forth in Title 26 of the Aspen Municipal Code, the Planning and Zoning Commission hereby approves Residential Design Standard Review with Variations to Light well/Stairwell Location as depicted and further described in Exhibit B to this Resolution. Section 3: Conditions of Approval The following conditions of approval must be met prior to building permit issuance: • The project must comply with all applicable Engineering Standards prior to building permit issuance, including requirements for a Major Development within the Urban Runoff Plan. • Compliance with applicable Parks requirements will be verified prior to building permit issuance. • The project must comply with all applicable Land Use Code and Building Code requirements. • Verification that the height over topography represented in the land use review is consistent with the final civil grading plans provided as part of the permit application is required prior to building permit issuance. Any deviation from the plan providing during land use review will be evaluated to determine if an amendment to this approval is required. The extent of the changes will determine if an amendment is required. • The applicant will be required to meet the lighting code at time of permit submission to document and show compliance with downcast and direction of Jighting requirements. Section 4: Material Representations All material representations and commitments made by the Applicant pursuant to the development proposal approvals as herein awarded, whether in public hearing or documentation presented before the Planning and Zoning Commission, are hereby incorporated in such site development approvals and the same shall be complied with as if fully set forth herein, unless amended by an authorized entity. Section 5: Existing Litigation This resolution shall not affect any existing litigation and shall not operate as an abatement of any action or proceeding now pending under or by virtue of the ordinances repealed or amended as herein provided, and the same shall be conducted and concluded under such prior ordinances. Section 6: Severability P&Z Resolution #09, Series of 2023 2 If any section, subsection, sentence, clause, phrase, or portion of this resolution is for any reason held invalid or unconstitutional in a court of competent jurisdiction, such portion shall be deemed a separate, distinct and independent provision and shall not affect the validity of the remaining portions thereof. APPROVED by the Commission at its meeting on November 21, 2023. APPROVED AS TO FORM: Katharine JoV61n, Assistant City Attorney AT ST- racy Terry, Deputy City Ajerk Attachment: Exhibit A — Approved Drawings Exhibit B — RDS Approval Checklist PLANNING AND ZONING C MISSION: 71�A- reraissa McGovern, Chair P&Z Resolution #09, Series of 2023 3 EyhjbR A -Approved Dw.-.ings m ll O z I IIPM •77- [_J .1 =IG-=LB=-RG=-R -H ------ ---- --- ----------- -------- _- 4 ------ ---- ----------- ---------- UARAUSITEPLAN PROPOSEDARCMTECTURALSITEPLAN A.1.101 t- 11 MONTTELEVATION I I I L-1---I-----1------t--t- — J SOUTH ELEVATION i-7V ------ F-j --------- - - - ---------- ---- t- T ELEVATION VvESTELEVATION =-IG=LB=RG=R wb EXrEfMATM REFEASME A.1.300 I T- R 4E.h>GuiRtit[c�liT..31,1!'C.H.Ri0tili�[J.teA [E+M. i t::f Mi�C•IFCyIYi' 2 E(NMRA4TERIALRAlETTE MEN s� P--, 3 STPIE VWD IMREFLEGTNEYETRLS SUtER.F R5 c6sy'�tE £71� a��s: iTtia=a I I 1 I ExiEW EI ATIC12- DIm.m NORTH ELEVATION -ENLARGED a "�` '� " A.1.301 L--- I EXTEMItUATMALFALETrE boom%STOW YM W*REFUCTLEUETALS SUTER" ------------ uiuunc n EAST 4� LA�OM (SOLFrH WNG) EVATION (NORTH WNG) , 9) A.1.302 r SOUTH .-ELEVATION-ENLARGED wen Iss C-4 34 WEE UTERIC El AWIZ- D.W.0 [A.1.303 -4 ..'i PT= .,M E n R ]a R LIATE MA L PALEM L STCIJE Moo IK P} A EF LEG ME U ETl1S EUMROGF T T Sl E7L ,�A'ICN (NORTH WNG) @SSTELE DMROREMADA1S- FMARO A.1.304 I I Ice KMI'?aIi` i n aunuJ z? is=ti F4E S.RryA�,.u��•e q,: a spa{¢. t�_ass�� a a � W BA ONE STORY ELEMENT DIAGRAM Q O W Z w CD EJ Y n. d 3WUKE ❑ 1 3.uA ROS Cd60RIl11JLE ❑ 1 •' � t{ I� VIPLIiiEO!l SEPMATE ❑ i I i 1 �+'�`� CTT DO MT : s NEWS —" %� % � i•=IG=LB-RG=R ❑ i_..J • ❑ I c� �m _ _ i TO VJ(EAVBLE t % I % NEW O S ..-- -- -.-- .... _ G u.u:xnRutci,ier ,u.eun,o c[sti.T,ur ca.c,n,u r�t[:[v, Mll =p+z,RE�Ase= ,v-6nEin vs `vA:[rtY A05 [OE �_. ,. ••�-_rs.: :'�, .r.�ri•.^-:•i `S.r.ii:r•ra _______ 04filws91.115 E rn1R��J']tti )'e_1', C.�rL,•e'..ri�: n••ifni - 360 LAKE RDS COMPLAINCE DIAGRAM @ BLUFF RE%AEWAXO -SOUTHEAST L- IN BLUFF REMEWAXO -NORTHEAST =-IG=-LS=RG=R T v R I 'T L7 ��L- -j - - - - - - - - - - - - - I0P.F-FTR-7 BLUFF REVIEW NORTH ELEVATION G.1.006 I Exhibit B - RDS Approval Checklist Residential Design Standards► Administrative Compliance Review Staff Checklist - Single Family and Duplex CITY OF PEN Address: 360 Lake Ave; Aspen Scope of Work - Expansion/completion of partially -built home Parcel ID: 2735-121-32-001 Zone District/PD: R-6 Approved: Representative: Chris Bendon, BendonAdams (Approved plans/elevations attached) Email: chris@bendonadams.com Phone: 970.925.2855 Disclaimer: This application is only valid for the attached design. If any element of the design subject to Residential Design Standards changes prior to or during building permit review, the applicant shall be required to apply for a new Administrative Compliance Review. Standard Complies Alternative Does Not N/A Compliance Comply Sheet #(s)/Notes B.1.ArticulationofBuilding Mass Maximum side wall depth is approximately 44'-5" on the south facade (Non -flexible) and approximately 17'-7" on the north facade. B.2.Building Orientation (Flexible) I The front facade is street -facing although not visible from Lake Avenue due to the intervening parcel 350 Lake Ave. B.3,Build-to Requirement I F_,F The front facade, the western facade, is oriented towards Lake Avenue with approximately 76% of the front facade/front patio built within 5 feet of the "side yard" (Flexible) setback line. BA.One Story Element (Flexible) The applicant has amended the site plans to update the One-story Element feature to comply with Option 1. Projecting One-story Element. Access to the property is via a shared driveway / easement through the CA.Garage Access (Non -flexible) 350 Lake Avenue property to the west. Placement ! Option #2 is used with the garage door situated perpendicular to Lake Avenue. The garage is designed with windows and fenestration to appear like the rest of the (Non -flexible) (Non -flexible) residence. C.3.Garage Dimensions The garage door is not street facing with a width of 20 feet. (Flexible) Page 1 of 2 Approved: Residential Design Standards Administrative Compliance Review Staff Checklist TIECmaAm Disclaimer: This application is only valid for the attached design. If any element of the design subiect to Residential Design Standards changes prior to or daring building permit review; the applicant shall be required to apply for a new Administrative Compliance Review. Standard Complies Alternative Doesn't N/A Compliance Comply Sheet#(s)/Notes C.4.GarageDoor Design (Flexible) The two -car garage door is designed to appear as two separate doors. D.1.Entry Connection The front facade has a covered front porch that is open on two sides. (Non -flexible) i D.2.DoorHeight (Flexible) The front door is designed to be 8 feet tall with transom area above. D.3.EntryPorch (Flexible) Entry porch height is 10' - meeting the one-story definition. E.1.Principle window (Flexible) Two street -facing windows measuring 4'-6" by 4'-6" are provided. I I The updated design has the front facade windows measuring 10' in height E.2.WindowPlacement (Flexible) with a 1' tall transom and an additional 2'-6" window above the transom. E.3.Nonorthogonal Window Limit (Flexible) The design does not include non -orthogonal windows. EA.Lightwell/Stairwell Location The Light well/Stairwell Location is a horizontal element in the proposed design. The light well will be approximately 120 feet setback from the street. Since this element is flat and horizontal to the ground the visual (Flexible) impacts by this element are less impactful than those dimensional variation requests. Staff finds it meets alternative compliance. E.5.Materials j Exterior material are used consistently on all sides of the proposed (Flexible) I home. Page 2 of 2