Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
resolution.council.039-24
M� �f.Y1 � ► ► 1 1 '� SERIES OF 2024 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF ASPEN CITY COUNCIL APPROVING A CONTRACT FOR ARMORY HALL, 130 S. GALENA, BETWEEN THE CITY OF ASPEN AND CCY ARCHITECTS, AUTHORIZING THE CITY MANAGER TO E�VECUTE SAID CONTRACT ON BEHALF OF THE CITY OF ASPEN 1 1'•11 WHEREAS, there has been submitted to the City Council an agreement between the City Council (the "Owner") and CCY Architects. (the "Architect"), a true and accurate copy of which is attached hereto as "Exhibit A"and V�►�IERAS, City Council considered and approved the agreement at a regular council meeting on March 12, 2024; 1 V"F ASPEN AS 1 1 That the City Council of the City of Aspen hereby approves the agreement between Owner and Architect, a copy of which is annexed hereto and incorporated herein, and does hereby authorize the City Manager to execute said agreement on behalf of the City of Aspen. INTRODUCED READ AND ADOPTED by the City Council of the City of Aspen on the 12th day of March 2024, Torre, Mayor ATTEST: Nicole Henning, City Cl Resolution 03 9-2024 Armory Hall Remodel and Reuse project, architecture contract Page 1 of 1 DocuSign Envelope ID: 78C73221-D4C04583-B31C-DB918C79B06A Xd[WdrU 1=0rM UT AgFUUMell DeWeenm` FlUr n t ana anageras 4dviser Edition AGREEMENT made as of the Sth day of March in the year 2024 In words, indicate day, month, and year.) ADDITIONS AND DELETIONS: The author of this document has EETWEEN the Architect's client identified as the Owner: added information needed for its (Name, legal status, address, and other information) completion. The author may also have revised the text of the original City of Aspen AIA standard form. An Additions and c/o Capital Asset Department Deletions Report that notes added 427 Rio Grande Place information as well as revisions to the Aspen, CO 81611 standard form text is available from the author and should be reviewed. A and the Architect: vertical line in the left margin of this (Name, legal status, address, and other information) document indicates where the author has added necessary information CCY Architects and where the author has added to or PO Box 529 deleted from the original AIA text. Basalt, CO 81621 This document has important legal consequences. Consultation with an attorney is encouraged with respect for the following Project: to its completion or modification. (Name, location, and detailed description) This document is intended to be used in conjunction with AIA Documents Armory Hall Remodel and Reuse project, 130 S. Galena Street, Aspen, CO, as described in g132TM-2019, Standard Form of Exhibit C, City of Aspen Request for Proposals: Protect 2023404, Aspen Armory Hall Agreement. Between Owner and Remodel and Reuse. Contractor, Construction Manager as Adviser Edition; A232TM.2019, General Conditions of the Contract for Construction, Construction The Construction Manager: Manager as Adviser Edition; and (Name, legal status, address, and other information) C132TM-2019, Standard Form of Agreement Between Owner and TBD Construction Manager as Adviser. AIA Document A232TM-2019 is adopted in this document by reference. Do not use with other general conditions unless this The Owner and Architect agree as follows. document is modified. AIA Document B132 — 2019. Copyright ©1992, 2009, and 2019. All rights reserved. "The American Institute of Architects," "American Institute of Architects," "AIA," Init. the AIA Logo, and "AIA Contract Documents" are trademarks of The American Institute of Architects. This document was produced at 12:08:12 ET on 03/05/2024 —DS under Order No.4104244733 which expires on 08/21/2024, is not for resale, is licensed for one-time use only, and may only be used in accordance with the AIA Contract Documents® Terms of Service. To report copyright violations, e-mail docinfo@aiacontracts.com. User Notes. (1949855081) 1 DocuSign Envelope ID: 78C73221-D4CO- 583-1331C-DB918C791306A TABLE OF ARTICLES 1 INITIAL INFORMATION 2 ARCHITECT'S RESPONSIBILITIES 3 SCOPE OF ARCHITECT'S BASIC SERVICES 4 SUPPLEMENTAL AND ADDITIONAL SERVICES 5 OWNER'S RESPONSIBILITIES 6 COST OF THE WORK 7 COPYRIGHTS AND LICENSES 8 CLAIMS AND DISPUTES 9 TERMINATION OR SUSPENSION 10 MISCELLANEOUS PROVISIONS 11 COMPENSATION 12 SPECIAL TERMS AND CONDITIONS 13 SCOPE OF THE AGREEMENT ARTICLE 1 INITIAL INFORMATION § 1.1 This Agreement is based on the Inal Information set forth in this Section 1.1. For each item in this section, insert the information or a statement such as "not applicable, " or "unknown at time of execution ".) § 1.1.1 The Owner's program for the Project: (Insert the Owner's program, identify documentation that establishes the Owner's program, or state the manner in which the program will be developed.) The City of Aspen (owner) will pursue a collaborative project with the Architect. CMa is anticipated to be added during Part 1 Services based on the attached exhibits. The program and associated fees are outlined in Exhibit A, CCY Architects proposal dated December 18, 2023; Exhibit B. CCY Architects Fee Schedule -FINAL; Exhibit C, City of Aspen Request for Proposals: Project 2023404, Aspen Armory Hall Remodel and Reuse § 1.1.2 The Project's physical characteristics: (Identify or describe pertinent information about the Project's physical characteristics, such as size; location; dimensions; geotechnical reports; site boundaries; topographic surveys; traffic and utility studies; availability of public and private utilities and services; legal description of the site; etc.) The City of Aspen proposes to develop amixed-use project within Armory Hall, a building that formerly housed city hall. The 131 year -old building, located at 130 S. Galena, is approximately 19,000 square feet in size and sits at the corner of South Galena Street and East Hopkins Avenue. The subject building site is a 9,000 sq. ft. lot described as Lots K, L and M. Block 93, City and Townsite of Aspen § 1.1.3 The Owner's budget for the Cost of the Work, as defined in Section 6.1: (Provide total and, if known, a line item breakdown.) $22900000.00 AIA Document B132 — 2019. Copyright ©1992, 2009, and 2019. All rights reserved. "The American Institute of Architects," "American Institute of Architects," "AIA," �t' the AIA Logo, and "AIA Contract Documents" are trademarks of The American Institute of Architects. This document was produced at 12:08:12 ET on 03/05/2024 �ri� under Order No.4104244733 which expires on 08/21/2024, is not for resale, is licensed for one-time use only, and may only be used in accordance with the AIA I �- Contract Documents® Terms of Service. To report copyright violations, a -mail doclnf0@alacontracts.com. User Notes. (1949855081) 2 DocuSign Envelope ID: 78C73221-D4C0-4583-B31C-DB918C79B06A § 1.1.4 The Owner's anticipated design and construction milestone dates: .1 i Desgn phase milestone dates, if any: Project schedule as anticipated in ExhibitArchitects proposal dated December 18, 2023, recognizing that the commence and conclude dates shall be recalculated to reflect a start date that will begin immediately after city council approval of this contract. .2 Construction commencement date: 2026 .3 Substantial Completion date or dates: TBD .4 Other milestone dates: n/a � 1.1.E The Owner intends the following procurement method for the Project: (Identify method such as competitive bid or negotiated contract.) Request for proposals § 1.1.6 The Owner's requirements for accelerated or fast -track design and construction, multiple bid packages, or phased construction are set forth below: (Ident fy any requirements for fast - track scheduling or phased construction and, if applicable, list number and type of bid/procurement packages.) � 1.1.7 The Owner's anticipated Sustainable Objective for the Project: (Ident and describe the Owner's Sustainable Objective for the Project, if any.) § 1.1.7.1 If the Owner identifies a Sustainable Objective, the Owner and Architect shall complete and incorporate AIA Document E235-2019, Sustainable Projects Exhibit, Construction Manager as Adviser Edition, into this Agreement to define the terms, conditions and services related to the Owner's Sustainable Objective. If E235-2019 is incorporated into this Agreement, the Owner and Architect shall incorporate the completed E235-2019 into the agreements with the consultants and contractors performing services or Work in any way associated with the Sustainable Objective. § 1.1.8 The Owner identifies the following representative in accordance with Section 5.4: (List name, address, and other contact information.) CMa is TBD until later in the process, assumption is during Phase l :Enhanced Schematic Design § 1.1.9 The persons or entities, in addition to the Owner's representative, who are required to review the Architect's submittals to the Owner are as follows: (List name, address, and other contact information.) AIA Document B132 — 2019. Copyright ©1992, 2009, and 2019. All rights reserved. "The American Institute of Architects," "American Institute of Architects," Init. the AIA Logo, and "AIA Contract Documents" are trademarks of The American Institute of Architects. This document was produced at 12:08:12 ET on 03/05/2024 -DS under Order No.4104244733 which expires on 08/21/2024, is not for resale, is licensed for one-time use only, and may only be used in accordance with the AIA Contract Documents® Terms of Service. To report copyright violations, e-mail docinfo@aiacontracts.com. User Notes. (1949855081) 3 DocuSign Envelope ID: 78C73221-D4C0-4583-B31C-DB918C79BMA Jennifer Phelan, Development Manager, City of Aspen, 970-319-9949, jwphelan(.waspen.gov The Owner shall retain the following consultants and Contractors: (List name, legal status, address, and other contact information.) .1 Construction Manager: (The Construction Manager is identified on the cover page. If a Construction Manager has not been retained as of the date of this Agreement, state the anticipated date of retention. If the Architect is to assist the Owner in selecting the Construction Manager, complete Section 4.1.1.1.) TBD .2 Land Surveyor: Sopris Engineering .3 Geotechnical Engineer: TBD .4 (Paragraphs deleted) Other consultants and Contractors: (List any other consultants and Contractors retained by the Owner.) n/a § 1.1.11 The Architect identifies the following representative in accordance with Section 2.4: (List name, address, and other contact information.) Todd Kennedy, AIA Principal, CCY Architects tkennedy@ccyarchitects.com § 1.1.12 The Architect shall retain the consultants identified in Sections 1.1.12.1 and 1.1.12.2: (List name, legal status, address, and other contact information.) § 1.1.12.1 Consultants retained under Basic Services: .1 Structural Engineer: KL&A Engineers &Builders Dan Doherty, PE Principal and Senior Project Manager ddoherty@klaa.com AIA Document B132 — 2019. Copyright ©1992, 2009, and 2019. All rights reserved. "The American Institute of Architects," "American Institute of Architects," "AIA," Init. the AIA Logo, and "AIA Contract Documents" are trademarks of The American Institute of Architects. This document was produced at 12:08:12 ET on 03/05/2024 under Order No.4104244733 which expires on 08/21/2024, is not for resale, is licensed for one-time use only, and may only be used in accordance with the AIA —� Contract Documents® Terms of Service. To report copyright violations, e-mail docinfo@aiacontracts.com. User Notes. (1949855081) 0 DocuSign Envelope ID: 78C73221-D4C0-4583-B31C-DB918C79B06A .2 Mechanical, Electrical, Plumbing (MEP) Engineer: Resource Engineering Group August Hasz, PE President and Principal hasz@reginc.com .3 Technology Services: BG Buildingworks Jeremy Brandt j dbrandt@bgbuildingworks.com .4 Lighting Design: LS Group Elise Streeb, IALD, LEED AP Principal and Partner elise@ls.lighting .5 Historic Rehabilitation: The Collaborative Incorporated John Feinberg John@thecollaborativeinc.net .6 Community Engagement, Site Planning, Land Use Preparation, Landscape Architecture: Design Workshop Jessica Garrow Principal Planner and Community Engagement Specialist j garrow@designworkshop. com .T Development and Operational Consulting: Meriwether I Immersed Doug Winter VP of Operations Garrett Simon Partner gsimon@meriwetherco a com AIA Document B132 — 2019. Copyright ©1992, 2009, and 2019. All rights reserved. "The American Institute of Architects," "American Institute of Architects," "AIA," Init. the AIA Logo, and "AIA Contract Documents" are trademarks of The American Institute of Architects. This document was produced at 12:08:12 ET on 03/05/2024 —Ds under Order No.4104244733 which expires on 08/21/2024, is not for resale, is licensed for one-time use only, and may only be used in accordance with the AIA Contract Documents® Terms of Service. To report copyright violations, e-mail docinfo@aiacontracts.com. User Notes. (1949855081) DocuSign Envelope ID: 78C73221-D4C0-4583-B31C-DB918C79BMA .8 Restaurant Planning Consulting & Food Service Design: Ricca Design Studio Jeremy Kittelson Principal jkittleson@ricca.com .9 All Electric Food Service Operation and Facility Design Support: Frontier Energy Todd Bell Senior Project Manager ell@frontierenergy.com .10 Sustainability and Energy Modeling Consulting: Group 14 Engineering Laura Charlier Sustainability Director harlier@group14eng.com .11 Civil Engineering: Roaring Fork Engineering Richard Goulding, PE Principal richard@rfeng.biz § 1.1.12.2 Consultants retained under Supplemental Services: § 1.1.13 Other Initial Information on which the Agreement is based: § 1.2 The Owner and Architect may rely on the Initial Information. Both parties, however, recognize that the Initial Information may materially change and, in that event, the Owner and the Architect shall appropriately adjust the Architect's services, schedule for the Architect's services, and the Architect's compensation. The Owner shall adjust the Owner's budget for the Cost of the Work and the Owner's anticipated design and construction milestones, as necessary, to accommodate material changes in the Initial Information. § 1.3 The parties shall agree upon protocols governing the transmission and use of Instruments of Service or any other information or documentation in digital form. The parties will use AIA Document E203-2013, Building Information Modeling and Digital Data Exhibit, to establish the protocols for the development, use, transmission, and exchange of digital data. § 1.3.1 Any use of, or reliance on, all or a portion of a building information model without agreement to protocols governing the use of, and reliance on, the information contained in the model and without having those protocols set forth in AIA Document E203-2013, Building Information Modeling and Digital Data Exhibit, and the requisite AIA Document G202-2013, Project Building Information Modeling Protocol Form, shall be at the using or relying party's AIA Document 13132 — 2019. Copyright ©1992, 2009, and 2019. All rights reserved. "The American Institute of Architects," "American Institute of Architects," "Al Init. the AIA Logo, and "AIA Contract Documents" are trademarks of The American Institute of Architects. This document was produced at 12:08:12 ET on 03/05/2024 �-Ds under Order No.4104244733 which expires on 08/21/2024, is not for resale, is licensed for one-time use only, and may only be used in accordance with the AIA ,-r�� Contract Documents® Terms of Service. To report copyright violations, a -mail docinfo@aiacontracts.com. F� User Notes. (1949855081) DocuSign Envelope ID: 78C73221-D4C0-4583-B31C-DB918C79B06A sole risk and without liability to the other party and its contractors or consultants, the authors of, or contributors to, the building information model, and each of their agents and employees. § 1.4 The term "Contractors" refers to persons or entities who perform Work under contracts with the Owner that are administered by the Architect and Construction Manager. The term "Contractors" is used to refer to such persons or entities, whether singular or plural. The term does not include the Owner's own forces, or Separate Contractors, which are persons or entities who perform construction under separate contracts with the Owner not administered by the Architect and Construction Manager. ARTICLE 2 ARCHITECT'S RESPONSIBILITIES § 2.1 The Architect shall provide professional services as set forth in this Agreement. The Architect represents that it is properly licensed in the jurisdiction where the Project is located to provide the services required by this Agreement, or shall cause such services to be performed by appropriately licensed design professionals. § 2.2 The Architect shall perform its services consistent with the professional skill and care ordinarily provided by architects practicing in the same or similar locality under the same or similar circumstances. The Architect shall perform its services as expeditiously as is consistent with such professional skill and care and the orderly progress of the Project. § 2.3 The Architect shall provide its services in conjunction with the services of a Construction Manager as described in AIA Document C 132Tm-2019, Standard Form of Agreement Between Owner and Construction Manager as Adviser. The Architect shall not be responsible for actions taken by the Construction Manager. � 2.4 The Architect shall identify a representative authorized to act on behalf of the Architect with respect to the Project. § 2.5 Except with the Owner's knowledge and consent, the Architect shall not engage in any activity, or accept any employment, interest or contribution that would reasonably appear to compromise the Architect's professional judgment with respect to this Project. § 2.6 The Architect shall maintain the following insurance until termination of this Agreement. If any of the requirements set forth below are in addition to the types and limits the Architect normally maintains, the Owner shall pay the Architect as set forth in Section 11.9. The Architect's liability shall be limited to the policy limits identified in § § 2.6.1. — 2.6.6. § 2.6.1 Commercial General Liability with policy limits of Two Million Dollars ($ 2,000,000.00 )for each occurrence and Three Million Dollars ($ 3,000,000.00 ) in the aggregate for bodily injury and property damage. § 2.6.2 Automobile Liability covering vehicles owned, and non -owned vehicles used, by the Architect with policy limits of One Million Dollars ($ 1,000,000.00 )per accident for bodily injury, death of any person, and property damage arising out of the ownership, maintenance and use of those motor vehicles, along with any other statutorily required automobile coverage. § 2.6.3 The Architect may achieve the required limits and coverage for Commercial General Liability and Automobile Liability through a combination of primary and excess or umbrella liability insurance, provided such primary and excess or umbrella liability insurance policies result in the same or greater coverage as the coverages required under Sections 2.6.1 and 2.6.2, and in no event shall any excess or umbrella liability insurance provide narrower coverage than the primary policy. The excess policy shall not require the exhaustion of the underlying limits only through the actual payment by the underlying insurers. § 2.6.4 Workers' Compensation at statutory limits. � 2.6.5 Employers' Liability with policy limits of One Million Dollars ($ 1,000,000.00 )each accident, One Million Dollars ($ 1,000,000.00 )each employee, and One Million Dollars ($ 1,000,000.00 )policy limit. AIA Document B132 — 2019. Copyright ©1992, 2009, and 2019. All rights reserved. "The American Institute of Architects," "American Institute of Architects," "AIA," Init. the AIA Logo, and "AIA Contract Documents" are trademarks of The American Institute of Architects. This document was produced at 12:08:12 ET on 03/05/2024 —Ds under Order No.4104244733 which expires on 08/21/2024, is not for resale, is licensed for one-time use only, and may only be used in accordance with the AIA Contract Documents® Terms of Service. To report copyright violations, e-mail docinfo@aiacontracts.com. User Notes. (1949855081) 0 DocuSign Envelope ID: 78C73221-D4CO- 4583-B31C-DB918C79BMA § 2.6.6 Professional Liability covering negligent acts, errors and omissions in the performance of professional services with policy limits of One Million Dollars ($ 1,000,000.00 ) per claim and Two Million Dollars ($ 2,000,000.00 ) in the aggregate. § 2.6.7 Additional Insured Obligations. To the fullest extent permitted by law, the Architect shall cause the primary and excess or umbrella policies for Commercial General Liability and Automobile Liability to include the Owner as an additional insured for claims caused in whole or in part by the Architect's negligent acts or omissions. The additional insured coverage shall be primary and non-contributory to any of the Owner's insurance policies and shall apply to both ongoing and completed operations. § 2.6.8 The Architect shall provide certificates of insurance to the Owner that evidence compliance with the requirements in this Section 2.6. § 2.6.9 The Architect shall provide to the Owner acceptable certificates of insurance evidencing compliance with the requirements in this Section 2.6 prior to commencement of the Work and thereafter upon renewal or replacement of each required policy of insurance. Owner shall receive written notice at least 30 days prior to nonrenewal or cancellation of policies required by this Section 2.6, or 10 days prior notice due to nonpayment of premium. An additional certificate evidencing continuation of professional liability coverage shall be submitted with the final Application for Payment. Information concerning reduction of coverage on account of claims paid under the policy shall be furnished by the Architect with reasonable promptness. The certificates will show the Owner as an additional insured on the Comprehensive General Liability, Automobile Liability, umbrella or excess policies. § 2.6.10 Governmental Immunity: The parties hereto understand and agree that Owner is relying on, and does not waive or intend to waive by any provision of this contract, the monetary limitations (presently $350,000.00 per person and $1,093,000 per occurrence) or any other rights, immunities, and protections provided by the Colorado Governmental Immunity Act, Section 2440401 et seq., C.R.S., as from time to time amended, or otherwise available to Owner, its officers, or its employees. Owner's Insurance: The parties hereto understand that the Owner is a member of the Colorado Intergovern- mental Risk Sharing Agency (CIRSA) and as such participates in the CIRSA Property/Casualty Pool. Copies %J the CIRSA policies and manual are kept at the City of Aspen Finance Department and are available to Contractor for inspection during normal business hours. Owner makes no representations whatsoever with respect to specific coverages offered by CIRSA. Owner shall provide reasonable notice of any changes in its membership or participation in CIRSA. Owner shall require the Construction Manager and General Contractor to include Architect as an Additional Insured on their general liability insurance for its liability arising out of the Construction Manager's and/or General Contractor's ongoing and completed operations related to the Project using blanket forms ISO CG 20 3 8 12 19 (ongoing operations) and ISO CG 20 40 12 19 (completed operations). § 2.6.12 Deductible: The Architect shall pay any amounts not covered under Architect's policies because of a deductible on the insurance policies provided by the Architect. ARTICLE 3 SCOPE OF ARCHITECT'S BASIC SERVICES § 3.1 The Architect's Basic Services consist of those described in this Article 3 and include usual and customary structural, mechanical, and electrical engineering services. Services not set forth in this Article 3 are Supplemental or Additional Services. The initial contract includes services as described herein and in referenced exhibits: Exhibit A. CCY Architects proposal dated December 18, 2023; Exhibit B, CCY Architects Fee Schedule; Exhibit C, City of Aspen Request for Proposals project 2023404: Aspen Armory Hall Remodel and Reuse. The initial contract includes: Part 1: Conceptual/Schematic Design Part 2: Support for the Land Use Application and review process Part 3: Design Development Part 4: Approval Documents -recordation support Part 5: Construction Documents Additional portions of work may be added as the project moves forward, by amendment: Part 6: Support for the Building Permit Application Process Part 7: Construction Administration AIA Document B132 — 2019. Copyright ©1992, 2009, and 2019. All rights reserved. "The American Institute of Architects," "American Institute of Architects," "AIA," Init. the AIA Logo, and "AIA Contract Documents" are trademarks of The American Institute of Architects. This document was produced at 12:08:12 ET on 03/05/2024 _ under Order No.4104244733 which expires on 08/21/2024, is not for resale, is licensed for one-time use only, and may only be used in accordance with the AIA Contract Documents® Terms %J Service. To report copyright violations, a -mail docinfo@aiacontracts.com. User Notes. (1949855081) DocuSign Envelope ID: 78C73221-D4C0-4583-B31 C-DB918C79BMA Part 8. Project Closeout and Warranty Support The Architect shall manage the Architect's services, research applicable design criteria, attend Project meetings, communicate with members of the Project team, and report progress to the Owner. § 3.1.2 The Architect shall coordinate its services with those services provided by the Owner, the Construction Manager, and the Owner's other consultants. The Architect shall be entitled to rely on, and shall not be responsible for, the accuracy, completeness, and timeliness of, services and information furnished by the Owner, the Construction Manager, and the Owner's other consultants. The Architect shall provide prompt written notice to the Owner if the Architect becomes aware of any error, omission or inconsistency, in such services or information. § 3.1.3 As soon as practicable after the date of this Agreement, the Architect shall submit, for the Construction Manager's review and the Owner's approval, a schedule for the performance of the Architect's services. The schedule shall include'design phase milestone dates, as well as the anticipated dates for the commencement of construction and for Substantial Completion of the Work as set forth in the Initial Information. This schedule shall include allowances for periods of time required for the Owner's review, for the Construction Manager's review, for the performance of the Owner's consultants, and for approval of submissions by authorities having jurisdiction over the Project. Once approved by the Owner, time limits established by the schedule shall not, except for reasonable cause, be exceeded by the Architect or Owner. With the Owner's approval, the Architect shall adjust the schedule, if necessary, as the Project proceeds until the commencement of construction. § 3.1.4 The Architect shall submit information to the Construction Manager and participate in developing and revising the Project schedule as it relates to the Architect's services. The Architect shall review and approve, or take other appropriate action upon, the portion of the Proj ect schedule relating to the performance of the Architect's services. Architect shall not be responsible for an Owner's or Construction Manager's directive or substitution, or for the Owner's acceptance of non -conforming Work, made or given without the Architect's written approval. Architect shall, in coordination with the Construction Manager, contact governmental authorities required to approve the Construction Documents and entities providing utility services to the Proj ect. The Architect shall respond to applicable design requirements imposed by those authorities and entities. § 3.1.7 The Architect shall assist the Owner and Construction Manager in connection with the Owner's responsibility for filing documents required for the approval of governmental authorities having jurisdiction over the Project. § 3.1.8 The Architect shall assist the Owner and Construction Manager in connection with the Owner's responsibility for filing documents required for the approval of governmental authorities having jurisdiction over the Project. § 3.1.9 The Architect, if requested by the Owner, shall assist the Owner in interviewing and selecting the Construction Manager. § 3.2 Schematic Design Phase Services § 3.2.1 The Architect shall review the program and other information furnished by the Owner and/or Construction Manager, and shall review laws, codes, and regulations applicable to the Architect's services. § 3.2.2 The Architect shall prepare a preliminary evaluation of the Owner's program, schedule, budget for the Cost of the Work, Project site, and the proposed procurement and delivery method, and other Initial Information, each in terms oI the other, to ascertain the requirements of the Project. The Architect shall notify the Owner of (1) any inconsistencies discovered in the information, and (2) other information or consulting services that may be reasonably needed for the Project. The Architect shall present its preliminary evaluation to the Owner and/or Construction Manager and shall discuss with the Owner and Construction Manager alternative approaches to design and construction of the Project. The Architect shall reach an understanding with the Owner and Construction Manager regarding the requirements of the Project. AIA Document B132 — 2019. Copyright ©1992, 2009, and 2019. All rights reserved. "The American Institute of Architects," "American Institute of Architects," "AIA," It1it. the AIA Logo, and "AIA Contract Documents" are trademarks of The American Institute of Architects. This document was produced at 12:08:12 ET on 03/05/2024 —DS under Order No.4104244733 which expires on 08/21/2024, is not for resale, is licensed for one-time use only, and may only be used in accordance with the AIA Contract Documents® Terms of Service. To report copyright violations, a -mail docinfo@aiacontracts.com. User Notes: (1949855081) E DocuSign Envelope ID: 78C73221-D4CO- 4583-B31C-DB918C79BMA § 3.2.4 Based on the Project requirements agreed upon with the Owner, the Architect shall prepare and present, to the Owner and/or Construction Manager, for the Owner's approval, a preliminary design illustrating the scale and relationship of the Project components. Based on the Owner's approval of the preliminary design, the Architect shall prepare Schematic Design Documents for the Construction Manager's review and Owner's approval. The Schematic Design Documents shall consist of drawings and other documents including a site plan, if appropriate, and preliminary building plans, sections and elevations; and may include some combination of study models, perspective sketches, or digital representations. Preliminary selections of major building systems and construction materials shall be noted on the drawings or described in writing. § 3.2.5.1 The Architect shall consider sustainable design alternatives, such as material choices and building orientation, together with other considerations based on program and aesthetics, in developing a design that is consistent with the Owner's program, schedule and budget for the Cost of the Work. The Owner may obtain more advanced sustainable design services as a Supplemental Service under Section 4.1.1. § 3.2.5.2 The Architect shall consider with the Owner and/or the Construction Manager the value of alternative materials, building systems and equipment, together with other considerations based on program and aesthetics, in developing a design for the Project that is consistent with the Owner's program, schedule, and budget for the Cost of the Work. § 3.2.6 The Architect shall submit the Schematic Design Documents to the Owner and/or the Construction Manager. The Architect shall meet with the Owner and/or Construction Manager to review the Schematic Design Documents. § 3.2.7 Upon receipt of the Owner and/or Construction Manager's review comments and cost estimate at the conclusion of the Schematic Design Phase, the Architect shall take action as required under Section 6.4, and request the Owner's approval of the Schematic Design Documents. If revisions to the Schematic Design Documents are required to comply with the Owner's budget for the Cost of the Work at the conclusion of the Schematic Design Phase, the Architect shall incorporate such revisions in the Design Development Phase. § 3.2.8 In the further development of the Drawings and Specifications during this and subsequent phases of design, the Architect shall be entitled to rely on the accuracy of the estimates of the Cost of the Work, which are to be provided by the Construction Manager under the Construction Manager's agreement with the Owner. § 3.3 Design Development Phase Services § 3.3.1 Based on the Owner's approval of the Schematic Design Documents, and on the Owner's authorization of any adjustments in the Project requirements and the budget for the Cost of the Work, the Architect shall prepare Design Development Documents for the Construction Manager's review and the Owner's approval. The Design Development Documents shall be based upon information provided, and estimates prepared by, the Construction Manager and shall illustrate and describe the development of the approved Schematic Design Documents and shall consist of drawings and other documents including plans, sections, elevations, typical construction details, and diagrammatic layouts of building systems to fix and describe the size and character of the Project as to architectural, structural, mechanical and electrical systems, and other appropriate elements. The Design Development Documents shall also include outline specifications that identify major materials and systems and establish in general their quality levels. § 3.3.2 Prior to the conclusion of the Design Development Phase, the Architect shall submit the Design Development Documents to the Owner and the Construction Manager. The Architect shall meet with the Construction Manager to review the Design Development Documents. § 3.3.3 Upon receipt of the Construction Manager's information and estimate at the conclusion of the Design Development Phase, the Architect shall take action as required under Sections 6.5 and 6.6 and request the Owner's approval of the Design Development Documents. § 3.4 Construction Documents Phase Services § 3.4.1 Based on the Owner's approval of the Design Development Documents, and on the Owner's authorization of any adjustments in the Project requirements and the budget for the Cost of the Work, the Architect shall prepare Construction Documents for the Construction Manager's review and the Owner's approval. The Construction AIA Document B132 — 2019. Copyright ©1992, 2009, and 2019. All rights reserved. "The American Institute of Architects," "American Institute of Architects," "Al Init. the AIA Logo, and "AIA Contract Documents" are trademarks of The American Institute of Architects. This document was produced at 12:08:12 ET on 03/05/2024 ,� o —Ds under Order No.4104244733 which expires on 08/21/2024, is not for resale, is licensed for one-time use only, and may only be used in accordance with the AIA Contract Documents® Terms of Service. To report copyright violations, a -mail docinfo@aiacontracts.com. User Notes. (1949855081) DocuSign Envelope ID: 78C73221-D4C0-4583-B31C-DB918C79B06A Init. Documents shail illustrate and describe the further development of the approved Design Development Documents and shall consist of Drawings and Specifications setting forth in detail the quality levels and performance criteria of materials and systems and other requirements for the construction of the Work. The Owner and Architect acknowledge that, in order to perform the Work, the Contractor will provide additional information, including Shop Drawings, Product Data, Samples and other similar submittals, which the Architect shall review in accordance with S ection 3.6.4. § 3.4.2 The Architect shall incorporate the design requirements of governmental authorities having jurisdiction over the Project into the Construction Documents. § 3.4.3 Prior to the conclusion of the Construction Documents Phase, the Architect shall submit the Construction Documents to the Owner and the Construction Manager. The Architect shall meet with the Construction Manager to review the Construction Documents. § 3.4.4 Upon receipt of the Construction Manager's information and an estimate at the conclusion of the Construction Documents Phase, the Architect shall take action as required under Section 6.7 and request the Owner's approval of the Construction Documents. (Paragraph deleted) § 3.5 Procurement Phase Services - Not included in Basic Services, may be added by amendment to contract in the f utu re. § 3.5.1 General The Architect shall assist the Owner and Construction Manager in establishing a list of prospective contractors. Following the Owner's approval of the Construction Documents, the Architect shall assist the Owner and Construction Manager in (1) obtaining either competitive bids or negotiated proposals; (2) confirming responsiveness of bids or proposals; (3) determining the successful bid or proposal, if any; and (4) awarding and preparing Contracts for Construction. § 3.5.2 Competitive Bidding § 3.5.2.1 Bidding Documents shall consist of bidding requirements and proposed Contract Documents. § 3.5.2.2 The Architect shall assist the Owner and Construction Manager in bidding the Project by .1 facilitating the distribution of Bidding Documents to prospective bidders; .2 organizing and conducting a pre -bid conference for prospective bidders; .3 preparing responses to questions from prospective bidders and providing clarifications and interpretations of the Bidding Documents to the prospective bidders in the form of addenda; and .4 organizing and conducting the opening of bids, and subsequently documenting and distributing the bidding results, as directed by the Owner. § 3.5.2.3 If the Bidding Documents permit substitutions, upon the Owner's written authorization, the Architect shall, as an Additional Service, consider requests for substitutions, and prepare and distribute addenda identifying approved substitutions to all prospective bidders. § 3.5.3 Negotiated Proposals § 3.5.3.1 Proposal Documents shall consist of proposal requirements, and proposed Contract Documents. § 3.5.3.2 The Architect shall assist the Owner and Construction Manager in obtaining proposals by: .1 facilitating the distribution of Proposal Documents for distribution to prospective Contractors, and requesting their return upon completion of the negotiation process; .2 organizing and participating in selection interviews with prospective Contractors; 3 preparing responses to questions from prospective Contractors and providing clarifications and interpretations of the Proposal Documents to the prospective Contractors in the form of addenda; and .4 participating in negotiations with prospective Contractors, and subsequently preparing a summary report of the negotiation results, as directed by the Owner. AIA Document B132 — 2019. Copyright ©1992, 2009, and 2019. All rights reserved. "The American Institute of Architects," "American Institute of Architects," "AIA," the AIA Logo, and "AIA Contract Documents" are trademarks of The American Institute of Architects. This document was produced at 12:08:12 ET on 03/05/2024 under Order No.4104244733 which expires on 08/21/2024, is not for resale, is licensed for one-time use only, and may only be used in accordance with the AIA Contract Documents® Terms of Service. To report copyright violations, a -mail docinfo@aiacontracts.com. User Notes. (1949855081) 11 DocuSign Envelope ID: 78C73221-D4C0-4583-B31 C-DB918C79BMA § 3.5.3.3 If the Proposal Documents permit substitutions, upon the Owner's written authorization, the Architect shall, as an Additional Service, consider requests for substitutions, consult with the Construction Manager, and prepare and distribute addenda identifying approved substitutions to all prospective contractors. § 3.6 Construction Phase Services -Not included in Basic Services, may be added by amendment to contract in the future. § 3.6.1 General § 3.6.1.1 The Architect shall provide administration of the Contract between the Owner and the Contractor as set forth below and in AIA Document A232TM-2019, General Conditions of the Contract for Construction, Construction Manager as Adviser Editi Mon. If the Owner and Contractor modify AIA Document A232-2019, those modifications shall not affect the Architect's services under this Agreement unless the Owner and the Architect amend this Agreement. § 3.6.1.2 The Architect shall advise and consult with the Owner and Construction Manager during the Construction Phase Services. The Architect shall have authority to act on behalf of the Owner only to the extent provided in this Agreement. The Architect shall not have control over, charge of, or responsibility for the construction means, methods, techniques, sequences or procedures, or for safety precautions and programs in connection with the Work, or shall the Architect be responsible for the Contractors' failure to perform the Work in accordance with the requirements of the Contract Documents. The Architect shall be responsible for the Architect's negligent acts or omissions, but shall not have control over or charge of, and shall not be responsible for acts or omissions of the Construction Manager, or acts or omissions of the Contractors or of any other persons or entities performing portions of the Work. § 3.6.1.3 Subject to Section 4.2, and except as provided in Section 3.6.6.5, the Architect's responsibility to provide Construction Phase Services commences with the award of the initial Contract for Construction and terminates on the date the Architect issues the final Certificate for Payment. Evaluations of the Work § 3.6.2.1 The Architect shall visit the site at intervals appropriate to the stage of construction, or as otherwise required in Section 4.2.3, to become generally familiar with the progress and quality of the portion of the Work completed, and to determine, in general, if the Work observed is being performed in a manner indicating that the Work, when fully completed, will be in accordance with the Contract Documents. However, the Architect shall not be required to make exhaustive or continuous on -site inspections to check the quality or quantity of the Work. On the basis of the site visits, the Architect shall keep the Owner reasonably informed about the progress and quality of the portion of the Work completed, and promptly report to the Owner and the Construction Manager (1) known deviations from the Contract Documents, (2) known deviations from the most recent construction schedule submitted by the Construction Manager, and (3) defects and deficiencies observed in the Work. § 3.6.2.2 The Architect has the authority to reject Work that does not conform to the Contract Documents and shall notify the Construction Manager about the rejection. Whenever the Architect considers it necessary or advisable, the Architect, upon written authorization from the Owner and notification to the Construction Manager, shall have the authority to require inspection or testing of the Work in accordance with the provisions of the Contract Documents, whether or not the Work is fabricated, installed or completed. However, neither this authority of the Architect nor a decision made in good faith either to exercise or not to exercise such authority shall give rise to a duty or responsibility of the Architect to the Contractors, Subcontractors, suppliers, their agents or employees, or other persons or entities performing portions of the Work. § 3.6.2.3 The Architect shall interpret and decide matters concerning performance under, and requirements of, the Contract Documents on written request of the Construction Manager, Owner, or Contractors through the Construction Manager. The Architect's response to such requests shall be made in writing within any time limits agreed upon or otherwise with reasonable promptness. § 3.6.2.4 Interpretations and decisions of the Architect shall be consistent with the intent of, and reasonably inferable from, the Contract Documents and shall be in writing or in the form of drawings. When making such interpretations and decisions, the Architect shall endeavor to secure faithful performance by the Owner and Contractors, shall not show partiality to either, and shall not be liable for results of interpretations or decisions rendered in good faith. The AIA Document B132 — 2019. Copyright ©1992, 2009, and 2019. All rights reserved. "The American Institute of Architects," "American Institute of Architects," "Al Init. the AIA Logo, and "AIA Contract Documents" are trademarks of The American Institute of Architects. This document was produced at 12:08:12 ET on 03/05/2024 —Ds under Order No.4104244733 which expires on 08/21/2024, is not for resale, is licensed for one-time use only, and may only be used in accordance with the AIA Contract Documents® Terms of Service. To report copyright violations, a -mail docinfo@aiacontracts.com. User Notes: (1949855081) 12 DocuSign Envelope ID: 78C73221-D4C0-4583-B31 C-DB918C79B06A Architect's decisions on matters relating to aesthetic effect shall be final if consistent with the intent expressed in the Contract Documents. Unless the Owner and Contractors designate another person to serve as an Initial Decision Maker, as that term is defined in AIA Document A232-2019, the Architect, with the assistance of the Construction Manager, shall render initial decisions on Claims between the Owner and Contractors as provided in the Contract Documents. § 3.6.3 Certificates for Payment to Contractor § 3.6.3.1 Not more frequently than monthly, the Architect shall review and certify an application for payment. Within seven days after the Architect receives an application for payment forwarded from the Construction Manager, the Architect shall review and certify the application as follows: .1 Where there is only one Contractor responsible for performing the Work, the Architect shall review the Contractor's Application and Certificate for Payment that the Construction Manager has previously reviewed and certified. The Architect shall certify the amount due the Contractor and shall issue a Certificate for Payment in such amount. .2 Where there is more than one Contractor responsible for performing different portions of the Project, the Architect shall review the Project Application and Project Certificate for Payment, with the Summary of Contractors' Applications for Payment, that the Construction Manager has previously prepared, reviewed, and certified. The Architect shall certify the total amount due all Contractors collectively and shall issue a Project Certificate for Payment in the total of such amounts. § 3.6.3.2 The Architect's certification for payment shall constitute a representation to the Owner, based on (1) the Architect's evaluation of the Work as provided in Section 3.6.2, (2) the data comprising the Contractor's Application for Payment or the data comprising the Project Application for Payment, and (3) the recommendation of the Construction Manager, that, to the best of the Architect's knowledge, information and belief, the Work has progressed to the point indicated, the quality of the Work is in accordance with the Contract Documents, and that the Contractors are entitled to payment in the amount certified. The foregoing representations are subject to (1) an evaluation of the Work for conformance with the Contract Documents upon Substantial Completion, (2) results of subsequent tests and inspections, (3) correction of minor deviations from the Contract Documents prior to completion, and (4) specific qualifications expressed by the Architect. § 3.6.3.3 The issuance of a Certificate for Payment or a Project Certificate for Payment shall not be a representation that the Architect has (1) made exhaustive or continuous on -site inspections to check the quality or quantity of the Work, (2) reviewed construction means, methods, techniques, sequences or procedures, (3) reviewed copies of requisitions received from Subcontractors and suppliers and other data requested by the Owner to substantiate each Contractor's right to payment, or (4) ascertained how or for what purpose that Contractor has used money previously paid on account of the Contract Sum. § 3.6.3.4 The Architect shall maintain a record of the Applications and Certificates for Payment. § 3.6.4 Submittals § 3.6.4.1 The Architect shall review the Constriction Manager's Project submittal schedule and shall not unreasonably delay or withhold approval of the schedule. The Architect's action in reviewing submittals transmitted by the Construction Manager shall be taken in accordance with the approved submittal schedule or, in the absence of an approved submittal schedule, with reasonable promptness while allowing sufficient time, in the Architect's professional judgment, to permit adequate review. § 3.6.4.2 The Architect shall review and approve, or take other appropriate action upon, the Contractors' submittals such as Shop Drawings, Product Data and Samples, that the Construction Manager has reviewed, recommended for approval, and transmitted to the Architect. The Architect's review of the submittals shall only be for the limited purpose of checking for conformance with information given and the design concept expressed in the Contract Documents. Review of such submittals is not for the purpose of determining the accuracy and completeness of other information such as dimensions, quantities, and installation or performance of equipment or systems, which are the Contractors' responsibilities. The Architect's review shall not constitute approval of safety precautions or construction means, methods, techniques, sequences or procedures. The Architect's approval of a specific item shall not indicate approval of an assembly of which the item is a component. AIA Document B132 — 2019. Copyright ©1992, 2009, and 2019. All rights reserved. "The American Institute of Architects," "American Institute of Architects," "Al Init. the AIA Logo, and "AIA Contract Documents" are trademarks of The American Institute of Architects. This document was produced at 12:08:12 ET on 03/05/2024 —Ds under Order No.4104244733 which expires on 08/21/2024, is not for resale, is licensed for one-time use only, and may only be used in accordance with the AIA Contract Documents® Terms of Service. To report copyright violations, a -mail docinfo@aiacontracts.com. User Notes: (1949855081) 13 DocuSign Envelope ID: 78C73221-D4CO. 4583-B31C-DB918C79B06A If the Contract Documents specifically require the Contractors to provide professional design services or certifications by a design professional related to systems, materials or equipment, the Architect shall specify the appropriate performance and design criteria that such services must satisfy. The Architect shall review and take appropriate action on Shop Drawings and other submittals related to the Work designed or certified by the Contractors' design professionals, provided the submittals bear such professionals' seal and signature when submitted to the Architect. The Architect's review shall be for the limited purpose of checking for conformance with information given and the design concept expressed in the Contract Documents. The Architect shall be entitled to rely upon, and shall not be responsible for, the adequacy and accuracy of the services, certifications, and approvals performed or provided by such design professionals. § 3.6.4.4 After receipt of the Construction Manager's recommendations, and subject to the provisions of Section 4.2, the Architect shall review and respond to requests for information about the Contract Documents. The Architect, in consultation with the Construction Manager, shall set forth in the Contract Documents the requirements for requests for information. Requests for information shall include, at a minimum, a detailed written statement that indicates the specific Drawings or Specifications in need of clarification and the nature of the clarification requested. The Architect's response to such requests shall be made in writing within any time limits agreed upon, or otherwise with reasonable promptness. If appropriate, the Architect shall prepare and issue supplemental Drawings and Specifications in response to the requests for information. § 3.6.4.5 The Architect shall maintain a record of submittals and copies of submittals transmitted by the Construction Manager in accordance with the requirements of the Contract Documents. § 3.6.5 Changes in the Work § 3.6.5.1 The Architect shall review and sign, or take other appropriate action, on Change Orders and Construction Change Directives prepared by the Construction Manager for the Owner's approval and execution in accordance with the Contract Documents. § 3.6.5.2 The Architect may order minor changes in the Work that are consistent with the intent of the Contract Documents and do not involve an adjustment in the Contract Sum or an extension of the Contract Time. Such changes shall be effected by written order issued by the Architect through the Construction Manager. § 3.6.5.3 The Architect shall maintain records relative to changes in the Work. § 3.6.6 Project Completion § 3.6.6.1 The Architect, assisted by the Construction Manager, shall: .1 conduct inspections to determine the date of Substantial Completion and the date of final completion; .2 issue a Certificate of Substantial Completion prepared by the Construction Manager; .3 review written warranties and related documents required by the Contract Documents and received from the Contractors, through the Construction Manager; and .4 after receipt of a final Contractor's Application and Certificate for Payment or a final Proj ect Application and Project Certificate for Payment from the Construction Manager, issue a final Certificate for Payment based upon a final inspection indicating that, to the best of the Architect's knowledge, information, and belief, the Work complies with the requirements of the Contract Documents. § 3.6.6.2 The Architect's inspections shall be conducted with the Owner and Construction Manager to (1) check conformance of the Work with the requirements of the Contract Documents and (2) verify the accuracy and completeness of the lists submitted by the Construction Manager and Contractors of Work to be completed or corrected. § 3.6.6.3 When Substantial Completion has been achieved, the Architect shall inform the Owner about the balance of the Contract Sum remaining to be paid each of the Contractors, including the amount to be retained from the Contract Sum, if any, for final completion or correction of the Work. § 3.6.6.4 The Architect shall forward to the Owner the following information received from the Contractors, through the Construction Manager: (1) consent of surety or sureties, if any, to reduction in or partial release of retainage or the AIA Document 13132 — 2019. Copyright ©1992, 2009, and 2019. All rights reserved. "The American Institute of Architects," "American Institute of Architects," "Al Init. the AIA Logo, and "AIA Contract Documents" are trademarks of The American Institute of Architects. This document was produced at 12:08:12 ET on 03/05/2024 —DS under Order No.4104244733 which expires on 08/21/2024, is not for resale, is licensed for one-time use only, and may only be used in accordance with the AIA Contract Documents® Terms of Service. To report copyright violations, a -mail docinfo@aiacontracts.com. User Notes. (1949855081) 14 DocuSign Envelope ID: 78C73221-D4C0-4583-B31 C-DB918C79BMA making of final payment; (2) affidavits, receipts, releases and waivers of liens, or bonds indemnifying the Owner against liens; and (3) any other documentation required of the Contractors under the Contract Documents. Upon request %J the Owner, and prior to the expiration of one year from the date of Substantial Completion, the Architect shall, without additional compensation, conduct a meeting with the Owner and Construction Manager to review the facility operations and performance. ARTICLE 4 SUPPLEMENTAL AND ADDITI®NAL SERVICES § 4.1 Supplemental Services - Architect is providing services described in CCY proposal, exhibit A. Services not described in proposal may be provided as an additional service. (Paragraphs deleted) (Table deleted) (Paragraphs deleted) § 4.2 Architect's Additional Services Fhe Architect may provide Additional Services after execution of this Agreement, without invalidating the Agreement. Except for services required due to the fault of the Architect, any Additional Services provided in accordance with this Section 4.2 shall entitle the Architect to compensation pursuant to Section 11.3 and an appropriate adjustment in the Architect's schedule. § 4.2.1 Upon recognizing the need to perform the following Additional Services, the Architect shall notify the Owner with reasonable promptness and explain the facts and circumstances giving rise to the need. The Architect shall not proceed to provide the following Additional Services until the Architect receives the Owner's written authorization: .1 Services necessitated by a change in the Initial Information, previous instructions or recommendations given by the Construction Manager or the Owner, approvals given by the Owner, or a material change in the Project including size, quality, complexity, building systems, the Owner's schedule or budget for Cost of the work, constructability considerations, procurement or delivery method, or bid packages in addition to those listed in Section 1.1.6; .2 Making revisions in Drawings, Specifications, or other documents (as required pursuant to Section 6.7), when such revisions are required because the Construction Manager's estimate of the Cost of the Work exceeds the Owner's budget, except where such excess is due to changes initiated by the Architect in scope, capacities of basic systems, or the kinds and quality of materials, finishes or equipment; .3 Services necessitated by enactment or revision of codes, laws, or regulations, including changing or editing previously prepared Instruments of Service; .4 Changing or editing previously prepared Instruments of Service necessitated by official interpretations of applicable codes, laws or regulations that are either (a) contrary to specific interpretations by the applicable authorities having jurisdiction made prior to the issuance of the building permit, or (b) contrary to requirements of the Instruments of Service when those Instruments of Service were prepared in accordance with the applicable standard of care; .5 Services necessitated by decisions of the Owner or Construction Manager not rendered in a timely manner or any other failure of performance on the part of the Owner, Construction Manager or the Owner's other consultants or contractors; .6 Preparing digital models or other design documentation for transmission to the Owner's consultants and contractors, or to other Owner -authorized recipients; .7 Preparation of design and documentation for alternate bid or proposal requests proposed by the Owner or Construction Manager; .8 Preparation for, and attendance at, a public presentation, meeting or hearing with the exception of those described in CCY's proposal, Exhibit A.; .9 Preparation for, and attendance at, a dispute resolution proceeding or legal proceeding, except where the Architect is party thereto; AIA Document B132 — 2019. Copyright ©1992, 2009, and 2019. All rights reserved. "The American Institute of Architects," "American Institute of Architects," "AIA," Iriit. the AIA Logo, and "AIA Contract Documents" are trademarks of The American Institute of Architects. This document was produced at 12:08:12 ET on 03/05/2024 ..._p under Order No.4104244733 which expires on 08/21/2024, is not for resale, is licensed for one-time use only, and may only be used in accordance with the AIA 15 Contract Documents® Terms of Service. To report copyright violations, e-mail docinfo@aiacontrOka ts.corn. w0M User Notes: (1949855081) DocuSign Envelope ID: 78C73221-D4C0-4583-B31C-DB918C79B06A .10 Evaluation of the qualifications of entities providing bids or proposals; .11 Consultation concerning replacement of Work resulting from fire or other cause during construction; or .12 Assistance to the Initial Decision Maker, if other than the Architect. .13 Requested revisions to the design and/or drawings to comply with the Owner's budget that are material changes to work completed and approved in the previous phases of work. § 4.2.2 If construction phase services as described in Section 3.6 are added to basic service through written amendment of this agreement to avoid delay in the Construction Phase, the Architect shall provide the following Additional Services, notify the Owner with reasonable promptness, and explain the facts and circumstances giving rise to the need. If, upon receipt of the Architect's notice, the Owner determines that all or parts of the services are not required, the Owner shall give prompt written notice to the Architect of the Owner's determination. The Owner shall compensate the Architect for the services provided prior to the Architect's receipt of the Owner's notice: .1 Reviewing a Contractor's submittal out of sequence from the Project submittal schedule approved by the Architect; .2 Responding to the Contractors' requests for information that are not prepared in accordance with the Contract Documents or where such information is available to the Contractors from a careful study and comparison of the Contract Documents, field conditions, other Owner -provided information, Contractor -prepared coordination drawings, or prior Project correspondence or documentation; .3 Preparing Change Orders, and Construction Change Directives that require evaluation of Contractors' proposals and supporting data, or the preparation or revision of Instruments of Service; .4 Evaluating an extensive number of Claims as the Initial Decision Maker; or .5 Evaluating substitutions proposed by the Owner, Construction Manager or Contractors and making subsequent revisions to Instruments of Service resulting therefrom. Architect shall provide Construction Phase Services exceeding the limits set forth below as Additional Services. When the limits below are reached, the Architect shall notify the Owner: .1 two ( 2 ) reviews of each Shop Drawing, Product Data item, sample and similar submittals of the Contractors .2 twenty (20 )visits to the site by the Architect during construction iions for aion of the Work to determine whether such portion of the Work i nspectny ports substantially complete in accordance with the requirements of the Contract Documents .4 one ( 1) inspections for any portion of the Work to determine final completion TBD upon addition of construction phase services by written amendment. Except for services required under Section 3.6.6.5 and those services that do not exceed the limits set forth in Section 4.2.3, Construction Phase Services provided more than 60 days after (1) the date of Substantial Completion of the Work, or (2) the anticipated date of Substantial Completion identified in the Initial Information, whichever is earlier, shall be compensated as Additional Services to the extent the Architect incurs additional cost in providing those Construction Phase Services. (Paragraph deleted) § 4.2.5 If the services covered by this agreement have not been completed within eighteen (18) months of the date of this agreement, through no fault of the Architect, extension of the Architect's services beyond that time shall be compensated as Additional Services. Scope added through written amendment shall reset this time frame for the added scope to the date of the amendment. ARTICLE 5 OWNER'S RESPONSIBILITIES § 5.1 Unless otherwise provided for under this Agreement, the Owner shall provide information in a timely manner regarding requirements for and limitations on the Project, including a written program which shall set forth the Owner's objectives, schedule, constraints and criteria, including space requirements and relationships, flexibility, expandability, special equipment, systems and site requirements. § 5.2 The Owner shall retain a Construction Manager to provide services, duties and responsibilities as described in AIA Document C132-2019, Standard Form of Agreement Between Owner and Construction Manager as Adviser. The Owner shall provide the Architect with a copy of the scope of services in the agreement executed between the AIA Document 13132 — 2019. Copyright ©1992, 2009, and 2019. All rights reserved. "The American Institute of Architects," "American Institute of Architects," Init. the AIA Logo, and "AIA Contract Documents" are trademarks of The American Institute of Architects. This document was produced at 12:08:12 ET on 03/05/2024 —DS under Order No.4104244733 which expires on 08/21/2024, is not for resale, is licensed for one-time use only, and may only be used in accordance with the AIA Contract Documents® Terms of Service. To report copyright violations, a -mail doclnfo@alacontracts.com. User Notes. (1949855081) 16 DocuSign Envelope ID: 78C73221-D4C0-4583-B31C-DB918C79BMA Owner and the Construction Manager, and any subsequent modifications to the Construction Manager's scope of services in the agreement. Owner shall establish the Owner's budget for the Project, including (1) the budget for the Cost of the Work as defined in Section 6.1 (2) the Owner's other costs; and (3) reasonable contingencies related to all of these costs. The Owner shall update the Owner's budget for the Project as necessary throughout the duration of the Project until final completion. If the Owner significantly increases or decreases the Owner's budget for the Cost of the Work, the Owner shall notify the Architect and the Construction Manager. The Owner and the Architect, in consultation with the Construction Manager, shall thereafter agree to a corresponding change in the Project's scope and quality. § 5.3.1 The Owner acknowledges that accelerated, phased or fast -track scheduling provides a benefit, but also carries with it associated risks. Such risks include the Owner incurring costs for the Architect to coordinate and redesign portions of the Project affected by procuring or installing elements of the Project prior to the completion of all relevant Construction Documents, and costs for the Contractors to remove and replace previously installed Work. If the Owner selects accelerated, phased or fast -track scheduling, the Owner agrees to include in the budget for the Project sufficient contingencies to cover such costs. § 5.4 The Owner shall identify a representative authorized to act on the Owner's behalf with respect to the Project. The Owner shall render decisions and approve the Architect's submittals in a timely manner in order to avoid unreasonable delay in the orderly and sequential progress of the Architect's services. § 5.5 The Owner shall furnish surveys to describe physical characteristics, legal limitations and utility locations for the site of the Project, and a written legal description of the site. The surveys and legal information shall include, as applicable, grades and lines of streets, alleys, pavements and adjoining property and structures; designated wetlands; adjacent drainage; rights -of --way, restrictions, easements, encroachments, zoning, deed restrictions, boundaries and contours of the site; locations, dimensions, and other necessary data with respect to existing buildings, other improvements and trees; and information concerning available utility services and lines, both public and private, above and below grade, including inverts and depths. All the information on the survey shall be referenced to a Proj ect benchmark. § 5.6 The Owner shall furnish services of geotechnical engineers, which may include test borings, test pits, determinations of soil bearing values, percolation tests, evaluations of hazardous materials, seismic evaluation, ground corrosion tests and resistivity tests, including necessary operations for anticipating subsoil conditions, with written reports and appropriate recommendations. § 5.7 The Owner shall provide the Supplemental Services designated as the Owner's responsibility in Section 4.1.1. § 5.8 If the Owner identified a Sustainable Objective in Article 1, the Owner shall fulfill its responsibilities as required in AIA Document E235TM-2019, Sustainable Projects Exhibit, Construction Manager as Adviser Edition, attached to this Agreement. § 5.9 The Owner shall coordinate the services of its own consultants with those services provided by the Architect. Upon the Architect's request, the Owner shall furnish copies of the scope of services in the contracts between the Owner and the Owner's consultants. The Owner shall furnish the services of consultants other than those designated as the responsibility of the Architect in this Agreement, or authorize the Architect to furnish them as an Additional Service, when the Architect requests such services and demonstrates that they are reasonably required by the scope of the Project. The Owner shall require that its consultants and contractors maintain insurance, including professional liability insurance, as appropriate to the services or work provided. § 5.10 The Owner shall furnish tests, inspections and reports required by law or the Contract Documents, such as structural, mechanical, and chemical tests, tests for air and water pollution, and tests for hazardous materials. § 5.11 The Owner shall furnish all legal, insurance and accounting services, including auditing services, that may be reasonably necessary at any time for the Project to meet the Owner's needs and interests. AIA Document B132 — 2019. Copyright ©1992, 2009, and 2019. All rights reserved. "The American Institute of Architects," "American Institute of Architects," "AIA," Init. the AIA Logo, and "AIA Contract Documents" are trademarks of The American Institute of Architects. This document was produced at 12:08:12 ET on 03/05/2024 —Ds under Order No.4104244733 which expires on 08/21/2024, is not for resale, is licensed for one-time use only, and may only be used in accordance with the AIA Contract Documents® Terms of Service. To report copyright violations, e-mail docinfo@aiacontracts.corn. User Notes. (1949855081) 17 DocuSign Envelope ID: 78C73221-D4C0-4583-B31&DB918C79B06A § 5.12 The Owner shall provide prompt written notice to the Architect and Construction Manager if the Owner becomes aware of any fault or defect in the Project, including errors, omissions or inconsistencies in the Architect's Instruments of Service. § 5.13 The Owner shall communicate with the Contractors and the Construction Manager's consultants through the Construction Manager about matters arising out of or relating to the Contract Documents. The Owner and Construction Manager shall include the Architect in all communications that relate to or affect the Architect's services or professional responsibilities. The Owner shall promptly notify the Architect of the substance of any direct communications between the Owner and the Construction Manager otherwise relating to the Project. Communications by and with the Architect's consultants shall be through the Architect. § 5.14 Before executing the Contracts for Construction, the Owner shall coordinate the Architect's duties and responsibilities set forth in the Contracts for Construction with the Architect's services set forth in this Agreement. The Owner shall provide the Architect a copy of the executed agreements between the Owner and Contractors, including the General Conditions of the Contracts for Construction. § 5.15 The Owner shall provide the Architect access to the Project site prior to commencement of the Work and shall obligate the Construction Manager and Contractors to provide the Architect access to the Work wherever it is in preparation or progress. § 5.16 Within 15 days after receipt of a written request from the Architect, the Owner shall furnish the requested information as necessary and relevant for the Architect to evaluate, give notice of, or enforce lien rights. § 5.17 The Owner shall provide the Architect with "As -Built Drawings" and BIM models completed as part of previously completed work on the property under a separate contracts) with a previous Architect(s). The Architect can rely on the accuracy of the information provided but will verify existing conditions as necessary within their Basic Services. ARTICLE 6 COST OF THE WORK § 6.1 For purposes of this Agreement, the Cost of the Work shall be the total cost to the Owner to construct all elements of the Project designed or specified by the Architect and shall include the Contractors' general conditions costs, overhead and profit. The Cost of the Work includes the compensation of the Construction Manager and Construction Manager's consultants during the Construction Phase only, including compensation for reimbursable expenses at the job site, if any. The Cost of the Work also includes the reasonable value of labor, materials, and equipment, donated to, or otherwise furnished by, the Owner. The Cost of the Work does not include the compensation of the Architect; the costs of the land, rights -of --way, financing, or contingencies for changes in the Work; or other costs that are the responsibility of the Owner. § 6.2 The Owner's budget for the Cost of the Work is provided in Initial Information, and shall be adjusted throughout the Project as required under Sections 5.3 and 6.4. Evaluations of the Owner's budget for the Cost of the Work represent the Architect's judgment as a design professional. § 6.3 The Owner shall require the Construction Manager to include appropriate contingencies for design, bidding or negotiating, price escalation, and market conditions in estimates of the Cost of the Work. The Architect shall be entitled to rely on the accuracy and completeness of estimates of the Cost of the Work the Construction Manager prepares as the Architect progresses with its Basic Services. The Architect shall prepare, as an Additional Service, revisions to the Drawings, Specifications or other documents required due to the Construction Manager's inaccuracies or incompleteness in preparing cost estimates, or due to market conditions the Architect could not reasonably anticipate. The Architect may review the Construction Manager's estimates solely for the Architect's guidance in completion of its services, however, the Architect shall report to the Owner any material inaccuracies and inconsistencies noted during any such review. § 6.3.1 If the Architect is providing cost estimating services as a Supplemental Service, and a discrepancy exists between the Construction Manager's cost estimates and the Architect's cost estimates, the Architect and the Construction Manager shall work together to reconcile the cost estimates. AIA Document B132 — 2019. Copyright ©1992, 2009, and 2019. All rights reserved. "The American Institute of Architects," "American Institute of Architects," "AIA," Intt. the AIA Logo, and "AIA Contract Documents" are trademarks of The American Institute of Architects. This document was produced at 12:08:12 ET on 03/05/2024 —Ds under Order No.4104244733 which expires on 08/21/2024, is not for resale, is licensed for one-time use only, and may only be used in accordance with the AIA Contract Documents® Terms of Service. To report copyright violations, a -mail docinfo@aiacontracts.com. User Notes. (1949855081) 18 DocuSign Envelope ID: 78C73221-D4CO- 4583-B31C-DB918C79BMA § 6.4 H. prior to the conclusion of the Design Development Phase, the Construction Manager's estimate of the Cost of the Work exceeds the Owner's budget for the Cost of the Work, the Architect, in consultation with the Construction Manager, shall make appropriate recommendations to the Owner to adjust the Proj Mect's size, quality or budget for the Cost of the Work, and the Owner shall cooperate with the Architect in making such adjustments. § 6.5 If the Construction Manager's estimate of the Cost of the Work at the conclusion of the Design Development Phase exceeds the Owner's budget for the Cost of the Work, the Owner shall .1 give written approval of an increase in the budget for the Cost of the Work; .2 terminate in accordance with Section 9.5; .3 in consultation with the Architect and Construction Manager, revise the Project program, scope, or quality as required to reduce the Cost of the Work; or .4 implement any other mutually acceptable alternative. § 6.6 If the Owner chooses to proceed under Section 6.5.3, the Architect, without additional compensation provided the requested changes are not materially changing the scope of previously completed and approved work, shall incorporate the revisions in the Construction Documents Phase as necessary to comply with the Owner's budget for the Cost of the Work at the conclusion of the Design Development Phase Services, or the budget as adjusted under Section 6.5.1. Revisions to the drawings that are material changes to the scope of previously completed and approved work shall be compensated as an additional service. The Architect's revisions in the Construction Documents Phase shall be the limit of the Architect's responsibility under this Article 6. § 6.7 After incorporation of modifications under Section 6.6, the Architect shall, as an Additional Service, make any required revisions to the Drawings, Specifications or other documents necessitated by subsequent cost estimates that exceed the Owner's budget for the Cost of the Work, except when the excess is due to changes initiated by the Architect in scope, basic systems, or the kinds and quality of materials, finishes or equipment. ARTICLE 7 COPYRIGHTS AND LICENSES Architect and the Owner warrant that in transmitting Instruments of Service, or any other information, the transmitting party is the copyright owner of such information or has permission from the copyright owner to transmit such information for its use on the Project. § 7.2 The Architect and the Architect's consultants shall be deemed the authors and owners of their respective Instruments of Service, including the Drawings and Specifications, and shall retain all common law, statutory and other reserved rights, including copyrights. Submission or distribution of Instruments of Service to meet official regulatory requirements or for similar purposes in connection with the Project is not to be construed as publication in derogation of the reserved rights of the Architect and the Architect's consultants. § 7.3 The Architect grants to the Owner a nonexclusive license to use the Architect's Instruments of Service solely and exclusively for purposes of constructing, using, maintaining, altering and adding to the Project, provided that the Owner substantially performs its obligations under this Agreement, including prompt payment of all sums due pursuant to Article 9 and Article 11. The Architect shall obtain similar nonexclusive licenses from the Architect's consultants consistent with this Agreement. The license granted under this section permits the Owner to authorize the Contractors, Construction Manager, Subcontractors, Sub -subcontractors, and suppliers, as well as the Owner's consultants and Separate Contractors, to reproduce applicable portions of the Instruments of Service, subject to any protocols established pursuant to Section 1.3, solely and exclusively for use in performing services or construction for the Project. If the Architect rightfully terminates this Agreement for cause as provided in Section 9.4, the license granted in this Section 7.3 shall terminate. § 7.3.1 In the event the Owner uses the Instruments of Service without retaining the authors of the Instruments of Service, the Owner releases the Architect and Architect's consultants) from all claims and causes of action arising from such uses. The Owner, to the extent permitted by law, further agrees to indemnify and hold harmless the Architect and its consultants from all costs and expenses, including the cost of defense, related to claims and causes of action asserted by any third person or entity to the extent such costs and expenses arise from the Owner's use of the Instruments of Service under this Section 7.3.1. The terms of this Section 7.3.1 shall not apply if the Owner rightfully terminates this Agreement for cause under Section 9.4. AIA Document B132 — 2019. Copyright ©1992, 2009, and 2019. All rights reserved. "The American Institute of Architects," "American Institute of Architects," "AIA," Init. the AIA Logo, and "AIA Contract Documents" are .trademarks of The American Institute of Architects. This document was produced at 12:08:12 ET on 03/05/2024 under Order No.4104244733 which expires on 08/21/2024, is not for resale, is licensed for one-time use only, and may only be used in accordance with the AIA 9S Contract Documents® Terms of Service. To report copyright violations, a -mail docinfo@aiacontracts.com. wM User Notes. (1949855081) 19 DocuSign Envelope ID: 78C73221-D4CO- 4583-B31C-DB918C79BMA § I A Except for the licenses granted in this Article 7, no other license or right shall be deemed granted or implied under this Agreement. The Owner shall not assign, delegate, sublicense, pledge or otherwise transfer any license granted herein to another party without the prior written agreement of the Architect. Any unauthorized use of the Instruments of Service shall be at the Owner's sole risk and without liability to the Architect and the Architect's consultants . § 7.5 Except as otherwise stated in Section 7.3, the provisions of this Article 7 shall survive the termination of this Agreement. ARTICLE 8 CLAIMS AND DISPUTES § 8.1 General § 8.1.1 The Owner and Architect shall commence all claims and causes of action against the other and arising out of or related to this Agreement, whether in contract, tort, or otherwise, in accordance with the requirements of the binding dispute resolution method selected in this Agreement and within the period specified by applicable law, but in any case not more than 10 years after the date of Substantial Completion of the Work. The Owner and Architect waive all claims and causes of action not commenced in accordance with this Section 8.1.1. § 8.1.2 To the extent damages are covered by property insurance, the Owner and Architect waive all rights against each other and against the contractors, consultants, agents and employees of the other for damages, except such rights as they may have to the proceeds of such insurance as set forth in AIA Document A232 2019, General Conditions of the Contract for Construction. The Owner or the Architect, as appropriate, shall require of the Construction Manager, contractors, consultants, agents and employees of any of them, similar waivers in favor of the other parties enumerated herein. § 8.1.3 The Architect shall indemnify and hold the Owner and the Owner's officers and employees harmless from and against damages, losses and judgments arising from claims by third parties, including reasonable attorneys' fees and expenses recoverable under applicable law, but only to the extent they are caused by the negligent acts or omissions of the Architect, its employees and its consultants in the performance of professional services under this Agreement. The extent of the Architect's obligation to indemnify or hold harmless the Owner may be determined only after the Architect's liability or fault has been determined by adjudication, alternative dispute resolution, or otherwise resolved by mutual agreement between the Architect and the Owner or any indemnity obligee. The Architect's obligation to indemnify and hold the Owner and the Owner's officers and employees harmless does not include a duty to defend. The Architect's duty to indemnify the Owner under this Section 8.1.3 shall be limited to the available proceeds of the Architect's insurance coverage required by this Agreement. Architect's duty to indemnify Owner is limited to the same extent Owner's liability is limited under the Colorado Governmental Immunity Act, Section 2440401 et seq., C.R.S., § 8.1.4 The Architect and Owner waive consequential damages for claims, disputes or other matters in question arising out of or relating to this Agreement. This mutual waiver is applicable, without limitation, to all consequential damages due to either party's termination of this Agreement, except as specifically provided in Section 9.7. § 8.2 Mediation § 8.2.1 Any claim, dispute, or other matter in question arising out of or related to this Agreement shall be subject to mediation as a condition precedent to binding dispute resolution. If such matter relates to or is the subject of a lien arising out of the Architect's services, the Architect may proceed in accordance with applicable law to comply with the lien notice or filing deadlines prior to resolution of the matter by mediation or by binding dispute resolution. § 8.2.2 The Owner and Architect shall endeavor to resolve claims, disputes and other matters in question between them by mediation, which, unless the parties mutually agree otherwise, shall be administered by the American Arbitration Association in accordance with its Construction Industry Mediation Procedures in effect on the date of this Agreement. A request for mediation shall be made in writing, delivered to the other party to this Agreement, and filed with the person or entity administering the mediation. The request may be made concurrently with the filing of a complaint or other appropriate demand for binding dispute resolution but, in such event, mediation shall proceed in advance of binding dispute resolution proceedings, which shall be stayed pending mediation for a period of 60 days from the date of filing, unless stayed for a longer period by agreement of the parties or court order. If an arbitration proceeding is stayed pursuant to this section, the parties may nonetheless proceed to the selection of the arbitrator(s) and agree upon a schedule for later proceedings. AIA Document B132 — 2019. Copyright ©1992, 2009, and 2019. All rights reserved. "The American Institute of Architects," "American Institute of Architects," "AIA," Init. the AIA Logo, and "AIA Contract Documents" are trademarks of The American Institute of Architects. This document was produced at 12:08:12 ET on 03/05/2024 —Ds under Order No.4104244733 which expires on 08/21/2024, is not for resale, is licensed for one-time use only, and may only be used in accordance with the AIA 1 Contract Documents® Terms of Service. To report copyright violations, a -mail docinfo@aiacontracts.com. O�MUser Notes: (1949855081) 20 DocuSign Envelope ID: 78C73221-D4C0-4583-B31C-DB918C79B06A § 8.2.3 The parties shall share the mediator's fee and any filing fees equally. The mediation shall be held in the place where the Project is located, unless another location is mutually agreed upon. Agreements reached in mediation shall be enforceable as settlement agreements in any court having jurisdiction thereof. § 8.2.4 If the parties do not resolve a dispute through mediation pursuant to this Section 8.2, the method of binding dispute resolution shall be the following: (Check the appropriate box.) [ ] Arbitration pursuant to Section 8.3 of this Agreement I[ X J Litigation in a court of competent jurisdiction If the Owner and Architect do not select a method of binding dispute resolution, or do not subsequently agree in writing to a binding dispute resolution method other than litigation, the dispute will be resolved in a court of competent jurisdiction. § 8.3 Arbitration § 8.3.1 If the parties have selected arbitration as the method for binding dispute resolution in this Agreement any claim, dispute or other matter in question arising out of or related to this Agreement subject to, but not resolved by, mediation shall be subject to arbitration, which, unless the parties mutually agree otherwise, shall be administered by the American Arbitration Association in accordance with its Construction Industry Arbitration Rules in effect on the date of this Agreement. A demand for arbitration shall be made in writing, delivered to the other party to this Agreement, and filed with the person or entity administering the arbitration. § 8.3.1.1 A demand for arbitration shall be made no earlier than concurrently with the filing of a request for mediation, but in no event shall it be made after the date when the institution of legal or equitable proceedings based on the claim, dispute or other matter in question would be barred by the applicable statute of limitations. For statute of limitations purposes, receipt of a written demand for arbitration by the person or entity administering the arbitration shall constitute the institution of legal or equitable proceedings based on the claim, dispute or other matter in question. § 8.3.2 The foregoing agreement to arbitrate, and other agreements to arbitrate with an additional person or entity duly consented to by parties to this Agreement, shall be specifically enforceable in accordance with applicable law in any court having jurisdiction thereof. § 8.3.3 The award rendered by the arbitrator(s) shall be final, and judgment may be entered upon it in accordance with applicable law in any court having jurisdiction thereof. § 8.3.4 Consolidation or Joinder § 8.3.4.1 Either party, at its sole discretion, may consolidate an arbitration conducted under this Agreement with any other arbitration to which it is a party provided that (1) the arbitration agreement governing the other arbitration permits consolidation, (2) the arbitrations to be consolidated substantially involve common issues of law or fact, and (3) the arbitrations employ materially similar procedural rules and methods for selecting arbitrator(s). § 8.3.4.2 Either party, at its sole discretion, may include by joinder persons or entities substantially involved in a common question of law or fact whose presence is required if complete relief is to be accorded in arbitration, provided that the party sought to be joined consents in writing to such joinder. Consent to arbitration involving an additional person or entity shall not constitute consent to arbitration of any claim, dispute or other matter in question not described in the written consent. § 8.3.4.3 The Owner and Architect grant to any person or entity made a party to an arbitration conducted under this Section 8.3, whether by joinder or consolidation, the same rights of joinder and consolidation as the Owner and Architect under this Agreement. AIA Document 13132 — 2019. Copyright ©1992, 2009, and 2019. All rights reserved. "The American Institute of Architects," "American Institute of Architects," Init. the AIA Logo, and "AIA Contract Documents" are trademarks of The American Institute of Architects. This document was produced at 12:08:12 ET on 03/05/2024 —Ds under Order No.4104244733 which expires on 08/21/2024, is not for resale, is licensed for one-time use only, and may only be used in accordance with the AIA Contract Documents® Terms of Service. To report copyright violations, a -mail docinfo@aiacontracts.com. lics User Notes: (1949855081) 21 DocuSign Envelope ID: 78C73221-D4CO- 4583-B31C-DB918C79B06A § 8.4 The provisions of this Article 8 shall survive the termination of this Agreement. ARTICLE 9 TERMINATION OR SUSPENSION § 9.1 If the Owner fails to make payments to the Architect in accordance with this Agreement, such failure shall be considered substantial nonperformance and cause for termination or, at the Architect's option, cause for suspension of performance of services under this Agreement. If the Architect elects to suspend services, the Architect shall give seven days' written notice to the Owner before suspending services. In the event of a suspension of services, the Architect shall have no liability to the Owner for delay or damage caused the Owner because of such suspension of services. Before resuming services, the Owner shall pay the Architect all sums due prior to suspension and any expenses incurred in the interruption and resumption of the Architect's services. The Architect's fees for the remaining services and the time schedules shall be equitably adjusted. § 9.2 If the Owner suspends the Project, the Architect shall be compensated for services performed prior to notice of such suspension. When the Project is resumed, the Architect shall be compensated for expenses incurred in the interruption and resumption of the Architect's services. The Architect's fees for the remaining services and the time schedules shall be equitably adjusted. § 9.3 If the Owner suspends the Project for more than 90 cumulative days for reasons other than the fault of the Architect, the Architect may terminate this Agreement by giving not less than seven days' written notice. § 9.4 Either party may terminate this Agreement upon not less than seven days' written notice should the other party I ail substantially to perform in accordance with the terms of this Agreement through no fault of the party initiating the termination. § 9.5 The Owner may terminate this Agreement upon not less than seven days' written notice to the Architect for the Owner's convenience and without cause. § 9.6 If the Owner terminates this Agreement for its convenience pursuant to Section 9.5, or if the Architect terminates this Agreement pursuant to Section 9.3, the Owner shall compensate the Architect for services performed prior to termination, Reimbursable Expenses incurred, and costs attributable to termination, including the costs attributable to the Architect's termination of consultant agreements. § 9.7 In addition to any amounts paid under Section 9.6, if the Owner suspends work or terminates this Agreement for its convenience with less than 28 days written notice, the Owner shall pay to the Architect the following fees: (Set forth below the amount of any termination or licensing fee, or the method for determining any termination or licensing fee.) .1 Termination/Suspension Fee: $25,000 .2 Licensing Fee if the Owner intends to continue using the Architect's Instruments of Service: n/a § 9.8 Except as otherwise expressly provided herein, this Agreement shall terminate one year from the date of Substantial Completion. § 9.9 The Owner's rights to use the Architect's Instruments of Service in the event of a termination of this Agreement are set forth in Article 7 and Section 9.7. ARTICLE 10 MISCELLANEOUS PROVISIONS § 10.1 This Agreement shall be governed by the law of the place where the Project is located, excluding that jurisdiction's choice of law rules. If the parties have selected arbitration as the method of binding dispute resolution, the Federal Arbitration Act shall govern Section 8.3. AIA Document B132 — 2019. Copyright ©1992, 2009, and 2019. All rights reserved. "The American Institute of Architects," "American Institute of Architects," "AIA," Init. the AIA Logo, and "AIA Contract Documents" are trademarks of The American Institute of Architects. This document was produced at 12:08:12 ET on 03/05/2024 —Ds under Order No.4104244733 which expires on 08/21/2024, is not for resale, is licensed for one-time use only, and may only be used in accordance with the AIA Contract Documents® Terms of Service. To report copyright violations, a -mail docinfo@aiacontracts.com. User Notes. (1949855081) 22 DocuSign Envelope ID: 78C73221-D4C0-4583-1331C-DB918C791306A § 10.2 Terms in this Agreement shall have the same meaning as those in AIA Document A232-2019, General Conditions of the Contract for Construction, Construction Manager as Adviser Edition, except for purposes of this Agreement, the term "Work" shall include the work of all Contractors under the administration of the Architect and Construction Manager. § 10.3 The Owner and Architect, respectively, bind themselves, their agents, successors, assigns, and legal representatives to this Agreement. Neither the Owner nor the Architect shall assign this Agreement without the written consent of the other, except that the Owner may assign this Agreement to a lender providing financing for the Project if the lender agrees to assume the Owner's rights and obligations under this Agreement, and including any payments due to the Architect by the Owner prior to the assignment. § 10.4 If the Owner requests the Architect to execute certificates, the proposed language of such certificates shall be submitted to the Architect for review at least 14 days prior to the requested dates of execution. If the Owner requests the Architect to execute consents reasonably required to facilitate assignment to a lender, the Architect shall execute all such consents that are consistent with this Agreement, provided the proposed consent is submitted to the Architect for review at least 14 days prior to execution. The Architect shall not be required to execute certificates or consents that would require knowledge, services, or responsibilities beyond the scope of this Agreement. § 10.5 Nothing contained in this Agreement shall create a contractual relationship with, or a cause of action in favor of, a third party against either the Owner or Architect. § 10.6 Unless otherwise required in this Agreement, the Architect shall have no responsibility for the discovery, presence, handling, removal or disposal of, or exposure of persons to, hazardous materials or toxic substances in any form at the Project site. § 10.7 The Architect shall have the right to include photographic or artistic representations of the design of the Project among the Architect's promotional and professional materials. The Architect shall be given reasonable access to the completed Project to make such representations. However, the Architect's materials shall not include the Owner's confidential or proprietary information if the Owner has previously advised the Architect in writing of the specific information considered by the Owner to be confidential or proprietary. The Owner shall provide professional credit for the Architect in the Owner's promotional materials for the Project. This Section 10.7 shall survive the termination of this Agreement unless the Owner terminates this Agreement for cause pursuant to Section 9.4. § 10.8 If the Architect or Owner receives information specifically designated as "confidential" or "business proprietary," the receiving party shall keep such information strictly confidential and shall not disclose it to any other person except as set forth in Section 10.8.1. This Section 10.8 shall survive the termination of this Agreement. § 10.8.1 The receiving party may disclose "confidential" or "business proprietary" information after 7 days' notice to the other party, when required by law, arbitrator's order, or court order, including a subpoena or other form of compulsory legal process issued by a court or governmental entity, or to the extent such information is reasonably necessary for the receiving party to defend itself in any dispute. The receiving party may also disclose such information to its employees, consultants, or contractors in order to perform services or work solely and exclusively for the Project, provided those employees, consultants and contractors are subject to the restrictions on the disclosure and use of such information as set forth in this Section 10.8. § 10.9 The invalidity of any provision of the Agreement shall not invalidate the Agreement or its remaining provisions. If it is determined that any provision of the Agreement violates any law, or is otherwise invalid or unenforceable, then that provision shall be revised to the extent necessary to make that provision legal and enforceable. In such case the Agreement shall be construed, to the fullest extent permitted by law, to give effect to the parties' intentions and purposes in executing the Agreement. ARTICLE 11 COMPENSATION § 11.1 For the Architect's Basic Services described under Article 3, the Owner shall compensate the Architect as follows: Part 1: Enhanced Schematic Design. Hourly billing, not to exceed $663,575.00 Part 2: Support for the Land Use Application and review process. Hourly billing, not to exceed $244,842.00 AIA Document 13132 — 2019. Copyright ©1992, 2009, and 2019. All rights reserved. "The American Institute of Architects," "American Institute of Architects," Intt. the AIA Logo, and "AIA Contract Documents" are trademarks of The American Institute of Architects. This document was produced at 12:08:12 ET on 03/05/2024 23 —Ds under Order No.4104244733 which expires on 08le) 1/2024, is not for resale, is licensed for one-time use only, and may only be used in accordance with the AIA Contract Documents® Terms of Service. To report copyright violations, a -mail docinfo@aiacontracts.com. User Notes: (1949855081) DocuSign Envelope ID: 78C73221-u CO- 583-KIC-D13918C791:306A Part 3: Design Development. Hourly billing or lump sum per proposal details, not to exceed $6359610.00 Part 4: Approval Documents -recordation support. Hourly billing or lump sum per proposal details, not to exceed $819542000 Part 5: Construction Documents. Hourly billing or lump sum per proposal details, not to exceed $646,941.00 *Mark-up on reimbursable expenses and consultant expenses are estimated at $178,986.00 The above referenced fees are further described in attached Exhibit A, CCY Architects proposal dated December 18, 2023 and Exhibit B, CCY Architects Fee Schedule -FINAL The above referenced fees for Part 1 -Part 5 do not include a 7.5%mark up on the Architect's consultants' invoices and a 10% mark-up on estimated reimbursables as described in attached Exhibit B, CCY Architects Fee Schedule -FINAL. The Architects invoice amounts shall not be marked up. In the event that there is a conflict between fees outlined in Exhibit A and B. Exhibit B shall control. (Paragraphs deleted) If the services covered by this agreement have not been completed within 50% of the durations provided in the Architect's proposal, Exhibit A, through no fault of the Architect's, the estimated top sets described above shall be adjusted to reflect the Architect's and their team's annual adjustments to their hourly rate schedules provided in CCY Architects Fee Schedule, Exhibit B- FINAL. § 11.2 For the Architect's Supplemental Services designated in Section 4.1.1 and for any Sustainability Services required pursuant to Section 4.1.3, the Owner shall compensate the Architect as follows: (Insert amount of, or basis for, compensation. If necessary, list specific services to which particular methods of compensation apply.) Additional services may be added by written amendment § 11.3 For Additional Services that may arise during the course of the Project, including those under Section 4.2, the Owner shall compensate the Architect as follows: (Insert amount of, or basis for, compensation.) Additional services may be added by written amendment § 11.4 Compensation for Supplemental and Additional Services of the Architect's consultants when not included in Sections 11.2 or 11.3, shall be the amount invoiced to the Architect plus seven and one half percent ( 7.5 %), or as follows: (Insert amount of, or basis for computing, Architect's consultants' compensation for Supplemental or Additional Services.) § 11.5 When compensation for Basic Services is based on a stipulated sum or a percentage basis, the proportion of compensation for each phase of services shall be as follows: Refer to Exhibit A, CCY Architects proposal dated December 18, 2023 and Exhibit B, CCY Architects Fee Schedule -FINAL AIA Document B132 — 2019. Copyright © 1992, 2009, and 2019. All rights reserved. he American Institute of Architects," "American Institute of Architects," "AIA," Init. the AIA Logo, and "AIA Contract Documents" are trademarks of The American Institute of Architects. This document was produced at 12:08:12 ET on 03/05/2024 24 DocuSign Envelope ID: 78C73221-D4C0-4583-B31C-DB918C79B06A The Owner acknowledges that with an accelerated Project delivery or multiple bid package process, the Architect may be providing its services in multiple Phases simultaneously. Therefore, the Architect shall be permitted to invoice monthly in proportion to services performed in each Phase of Services, as appropriate. § 11.6 When compensation identified in Section IS on a percentage basis, progress payments for each phase of Basic Services shall be calculated by multiplying the percentages identified in this Article by the Owner's most recent budget for the Cost of the Work. Compensation paid in previous progress payments shall not be adjusted based on subsequent updates to the Owner's budget for the Cost of the Work. � 11.6.1 When compensation is on a percentage basis and any portions of the Project are deleted or otherwise not constructed, compensation for those portions of the Project shall be payable to the extent services are performed on those portions. The Architect shall be entitled to compensation in accordance with this Agreement for all services performed whether or not the Construction Phase is commenced. § 11.7 The hourly billing rates for services of the Architect and the Architect's consultants are set forth below. The rates shall be adjusted in accordance with the Architect's and Architect's consultants' normal review practices. If applicable, attach an exhibit of hourly billing rates or insert them below.) Refer to Exhibit A, CCY Architects proposal dated December 18, 2023 and Exhibit B, CCY Architects Fee Schedule - FINAL Employee or Category § 11.8 Compensation for Reimbursable Expenses § 11.8.1 Reimbursable Expenses are in addition to compensation for Basic, Supplemental, and Additional Services and include expenses incurred by the Architect and the Architect's consultants directly related to the Project, as follows: .1 Transportation and authorized out -of town travel and subsistence; .2 Long distance services, dedicated data and communication services, teleconferences, Project web sites, and extranets; .3 Printing, reproductions, plots, and standard form documents; . t Postage, handling, and delivery; .5 Expense of overtime work requiring higher than regular rates, if authorized in advance by the Owner; .6 Renderings, physical models, mock-ups, professional photography, and presentation materials requested by the Owner or required for the Project; .7 If required by the Owner, and with the Owner's prior written approval, the Architect's consultants' expenses of professional liability insurance dedicated exclusively to this Project, or the expense of additional insurance coverage or limits in excess of that normally maintained by the Architect's consultants; .8 All taxes levied on professional services and on reimbursable expenses; .9 Site office expenses; .10 Registration fees and any other fees charged by the Certifying Authority or by other entities as necessary to achieve the Sustainable Objective; and .11 Other similar Project -related expenditures. For Reimbursable Expenses the compensation shall be the expenses incurred by the Architect and the Architect's consultants plus ten percent (10 %) of the expenses incurred. § 11.9 Architect's Insurance If the types and limits of coverage required in Section 2.6 are in addition to the types and limits the Architect normally maintains, the Owner shall pay the Architect for the additional costs incurred by the Architect for the additional coverages as set forth below: (Insert the additional coverages the Architect is required to obtain in order to satisfy the requirements set forth in Section 2.6, and for which the Owner shall reimburse the Architect.) AIA Document B132 — 2019. Copyright ©1992, 2009, and 2019. All rights reserved. "The American Institute of Architects," "American Institute of Architects," "Al Init. the AIA Logo, and "AIA Contract Documents" are trademarks of The American Institute of Architects. This document was produced at 12:08:12 ET on 03/05/2024 -DS under Order No.4104244733 which expires on 08/21/2024, is not for resale, is licensed for one-time use only, and may only be used in accordance with the AIA Contract Documents® Terms %J Service. To report copyright violations, e-mail docinfo@aiacontracts.com. User Notes. (1949855081) 25 DocuSign Envelope ID: 78C73221-D4C04583-B31C-DB918C79B06A § 11.10 Payments to the Architect § 11.10.1 Initial Payments § 11.10.1.1 An initial payment of Fifty Thousand ($ 50,000 the minimum payment under this Agreement. It shall be credit( d to the Owner's account in the final invoice. § 11.10.1.2 If a Sustainability Certification is part of the Sustainable Objective, an initial payment to the Architect of ($ ) shall be made upon execution of this Agreement for registration fees and other fees payable to the Certifying Authority and necessary to achieve the Sustainability Certification. The Architect's payments to the Certifying Authority shall be credited to the Owner's account at the time the expense is incurred. § 11.10.2 Progress Payments § 11.10.2.1 Unless otherwise agreed, payments for services shall be made monthly in proportion to services performed. Payments are due and payable upon presentation of the Architect's invoice. Amounts unpaid thirty ( 30 ) days after the invoice date shall bear interest at the rate entered below, or in the absence thereof at the legal rate prevailing from time to time at the principal place of business of the Architect. (Insert rate of monthly or annual interest agreed upon.) eighteen % 18% § 11.10.2.2 The Owner shall not withhold amounts from the Architect's compensation to impose a penalty or liquidated damages on the Architect, or to offset sums requested loy or paid to Contractors for the cost of changes in the Work, unless the Architect agrees or has been found liable for the amounts in a binding dispute resolution proceeding. § 11.10.2.3 Records of Reimbursable Expenses, expenses pertaining to Supplemental and Additional Services, and services performed on the basis of hourly rates shall be available to the Owner at mutually convenient times. ARTICLE 12 SPECIAL TERMS AND CONDITIONS Special terms and conditions that modify this Agreement are as follows: (Include other terms and conditions applicable to this Agreement.) § 12.1 Tax -Exemption. All purchases of supplies, construction or building materials shall not include Federal Excise Taxes or Colorado State or local sales or use taxes. The Owner's State of Colorado tax identification number is 9&04557. The Owner's Federal Tax Identification Number is 84-6000563. § 12.2 Independent Contractor Status. It is expressly acknowledged and understood by the parties that nothing contained in this agreement shall result in or be construed as establishing an employment relationship. Architect shall be, and shall perform as, an Independent Contractor who agrees to use his or her best efforts to provide the said services on behalf of the Owner. No agent, employee, or servant of Architect shall be, or shall be deemed to be, the employee, agent or servant of the Owner. Owner is interested only in the results obtained under this contract. The manner and means of conducting the work are under the sole control of Architect. None of the benefits provided by Owner to its employees including, but not limited to, workers' compensation insurance and unemployment insurance, are available from Owner to the employees, agents or servants of Architect. Architect shall be solely and entirely responsible for its acts and for the acts of Architect's agents, employees, servants and consultants during the performance of this contract. Architect shall indemnify Owner against all liability and loss in connection with, and shall assume full responsibility for payment of all federal, state and local taxes or contributions imposed or required under unemployment insurance, social security and income tax law, with respect to Architect and/or Architect's employees engaged in the performance of the services agreed to herein. § 12.3 Notice. Any written notices as called for herein may be hand delivered to the respective persons and/or addresses listed below or mailed by certified mail return receipt requested, to: Owner: City Manager AIA Document B132 — 2019. Copyright ©1992, 2009, and 2019. All rights reserved. "The American Institute of Architects," "American Institute of Architects," "AIA," Init. the AIA Logo, and "AIA Contract Documents" are trademarks of The American Institute of Architects. This document was produced at 12:08:12 ET on 03/05/2024 Ds under Order No.4104244733 which expires on 08/21/2024, is not for resale, is licensed for one-time use only, and may only be used in accordance with the AIA Contract Documents® Terms of Service. To report copyright violations, a -mail docinfo@aiacontracts.com. on User Notes. (1949855081) 26 DocuSign Envelope ID: 78C73221-D4CO- 4583-B31C-DB918C79B06A City of Aspen 427 Rio Grande Place Aspen, Colorado 81611 W ith a copy to : James R. True, Esq. City Attorney 427 Rio Grande Place Aspen, Colorado 81611 § 12.4 Non -Discrimination. No discrimination because of race, color, creed, sex, marital status, affectional or sexual orientation, family responsibility, national origin, ancestry, handicap, or religion shall be made in the employment of persons to perform services under this contract. Architect agrees to meet all of the requirements of Owner's municipal code, Section 13-98, pertaining to non-discrimination in employment. § 12.5 Waiver. The waiver by the Owner of any term, covenant, or condition hereof shall not operate as a waiver of any subsequent breach of the same or any other term. No term, covenant, or condition of this Agreement can be waived except by the written consent of the Owner. Forbearance or indulgence by the Owner in any regard whatsoever shall not constitute a waiver of any term, covenant, or condition to be performed by Architect to which the same may apply and, until complete performance by Architect of said term, covenant or condition, the Owner shall be entitled to invoke any remedy available to it under this Agreement or by law despite any such forbearance or indulgence. § 12.6 Execution of Agreement by Owner. This agreement shall be binding upon all parties hereto and their respective heirs, executors, administrators, successors and assigns. Notwithstanding anything to the contrary contained herein, this Agreement shall not be binding upon the Owner unless duly executed in accordance with the requirements of the Owner's municipal code by the Mayor of the City of Aspen, or a duly authorized official in his absence, following approval of City Council. § 12.7 Consultant shall comply with any reasonable request by the Colorado Department of Labor and Employment made in the course of an investigation that the Colorado Department of Labor and Employment undertakes or is undertaking pursuant to the authority established in Subsection 847.5402 (5), C.R.S. § 12.8 If Consultant violates any provision of the Public Contract for Services pertaining to the duties imposed by Subsection 8-17.5-102, C.R.S. the Owner may terminate this Agreement. If this Agreement is so terminated, Consultant shall be liable for actual damages to the Owner arising out of Consultant's violation of Subsection 847.5402, C.R.S. §12.9 It is agreed that neither this agreement nor any of its terms, provisions, conditions, representations or covenants can be modified, changed, terminated or amended, waived, superseded or extended except by appropriate written instrument fully executed by the parties. § 12.10 If any of the provisions of this agreement shall be held invalid, illegal or unenforceable it shall not affect or impair the validity, legality or enforceability of any other provision. § 12.11 Electronic Signatures and Electronic Records This Agreement and any amendments hereto may be executed in several counterparts, each of which shall be deemed an original, and all of which together shall constitute one agreement binding on the Parties, notwithstanding the possible event that all Parties may not have signed the same counterpart. Furthermore, each Party consents to the use of electronic signatures by either Party. The Scope of Work, and any other documents requiring a signature hereunder, may be signed electronically in the manner agreed to by the Parties. The Parties agree not to deny the legal effect or enforceability of the Agreement solely because it is in electronic form or because an electronic record was used in its formation. The Parties agree not to object to the admissibility of the Agreement in the form of an electronic record, or a paper copy of an electronic documents, or a paper copy of a document bearing an electronic signature, on the grounds that it is an electronic record or electronic signature or that it is not in its original form or is not an original. AIA Document B132 — 2019. Copyright ©1992, 2009, and 2019. All rights reserved. "The American Institute of Architects," "American Institute of Architects," "AIA," Init. the AIA Logo, and "AIA Contract Documents" are trademarks of The American Institute of Architects. This document was produced at 12:08:12 ET on 03/05/2024 under Order No.4104244733 which expires on 08/21/2024, is not for resale, is licensed for one-time use only, and may only be used in accordance with the AIA —Ds� Contract Documents® Terms of Service. To report copyright violations, a -mail docinfo@aiacontracts.com. User Notes. (1949855081) 27 DocuSign Envelope ID: 78C73221-D4C0�4583�B31C-DB918C79B06A § 13.1 his Agreement represents the entire and integrated agreement between the Owner and fibs Architect and supersedes all prior negotiations, representations or agreements, either written or oral. This Agreement nay be amended on, by written i nnstrument signed by both the Owner and Architect, � 13.2 This Agree�,�ent is comprised of the I°ollovving documents identi red beiowe .1 AIA Document E 132Tm-2019, Standard Form Agreement Between Omer and Architect, Construction Manager as Adviser Edition o� Exhibits o E��hibit A, CCY Architects proposal �'�lated I�ecen�beLr 11 �, 2023 Exhibit CCY Architects Fee Schedule FINAL (Parag,�aphs deleted) Exhibit C, City of Aspen Request for Proposals: Project 2023-404, Aspen Armory Hall Remodel and Reuse. Sara Ott City Manager (PIinted name and title) r-►rw� n � r_v � li..�c� Todd Kennedy Princij�al (Printed name, title, and license number, if applicable) AIA Document B132 — 2019. Copyright ©1992, 2009, and 2019. All rights reserved. "The American Institute of Architects," "American Institute of Architects," "AIA," the AIA Logo, and "AIA Contract Documents" are trademarks of The American Institute of Architects. This document was produced at 12:08:12 ET on 03/05/2024 under Order No.4104244733 which expires on 08/21/2024, is not for resale, is licensed for one-time use only, and may only be used in accordance with the AIA Contract Documents® Terms of Service. To report copyright violations, e-mail docinfo@aiacontracts.com. User Notes. (1949855081) DocuSign Envelope ID: 78C73221-D4C0-4583-1331C-DB918C791306A qaattions1Lo,1 �' 1 1 1 0 Document B132 VA • This Additions and Deletions Report, as defined on page 1 of the associated document, reproduces below all text the author has added to the standard form AIA document in order to complete it, as well as any text the author may have added to or deleted from the original AIA text. Added text is shown underlined. Deleted text is indicated with a horizontal line through the original AIA text. Note: This Additions and Deletions Report is provided for information purposes only and is not incorporated into or constitute any part of the associated AIA document. This Additions and Deletions Report and its associated document were generated simultaneously by AIA software at 12:08:12 ET on 03/05/2024. PAGE 1 AGREEMENT made as of the Sth day of March in the year 2024 City of Aspen c/o Capital Asset Dep 427 Rio Grande Place Aspen, CO 81611 CCY Architects PO Box 529 Basalt, CO 81621 an iect, 130 S. Galena Street, Aspen, CO, as described in Exhibit C, City of Aspen or Proposals: Proj he City Tof Aspen (owner) will pursue a collaborative proiect with the Architect. CM during Part 1 Services based on the attached e�ibits. The program and associated fees Architects osal dated December 18, 2023, Exhibit B, CCY Architects Fee Schedule -FINAL; Exhibit Aspen Request for Proposals: Proiect 2023404, Aspen Armory Hall Remodel and Reuse The Ci , of Aspen hall. The 131 ..' corner of South Gai Lots K, L and M, B No $22,000,000.00 PAGE 3 proposes to develop amixed-use ld building, located at 130 S. G�171010 1 owl ite fA Avg roiect within Armory Hall. a building that formerly housed ci ;na, is approximately 19,000 square feet in size and sits at the u e. The subiect building site is a 9,000 sq. ft. lot described as Additions and Deletions Report for AIA Document 8132 — 2019. Copyright ©1992, 2009, and 2019. All rights reserved. "The American Institute of Architects," "American Institute of Architects," "AIA," the AIA Logo, and "AIA Contract Documents" are trademarks of The American Institute of Architects. This document was produced at 12:08:12 ET on 03/05/2024 under Order No.4104244733 which expires on 08/21/2024, is not for resale, is licensed for one-time use only, and may only be used in accordance with the AIA Contract Documents® Terms of Service. To report copyright violations, a -mail docinfo@aiacontracts.com. User Notes. (1949855081) 1� DocuSign Envelope ID: 78C73221-D4CO- 4583-B31C-DB918C79B06A PW I CU L schedule as anticipated in Exhibit A. CC Architects recognizing that the commence and conclude dates shall be recalculated to reflect a begin immediately after city council 1 •, n/a Request for proposals Ca is TBD unti PAGE 4 Jennifer Phe 1 :er In the val of this contract. sumption is during Phase 1: Enhanced Schematic Desi Development Manager,_ City of Aspen, 970-319-9949, iwphelan Sopris En�ineerin :5—Other consultants and Contractors: n.�ov 1 ill Additions and Deletions Report for AIA Document B132 — 2019. Copyright ©1992, 2009, and 2019>. All rights reserved. "The American Institute of Architects," "American Institute of Architects," "AIA," the AIA Logo, and "AIA Contract Documents" are trademarks of The American Institute of Architects. This draft was produced at 12:08:12 ET on 03/05/2024 under Order No.4104244733 which expires on 08/21/2024, is not for resale, is licensed for one-time use only, and may only be used in accordance with the AIA Contract Documents® Terms of Service. To report copyright violations, a -mail docinfo@aiacontracts.com. User Notes. (1949855081) 0 DocuSign Envelope ID: 78C73221-D4CO- 4583-B31 C-DB918C79BMA n/a Todd Kennedy, AIA Principal, CCY Architects tkenned� PAGE 5 itects.com KL&A Engineers & Builde Dan Doherty, PE Principal and Senior Project Manager ddoherty(a,klaa.com Resource Grou August Hasz, PE President and Principal haszkreginc.com BG Buildin_w� orks Jeremy Brandt .4 Li�htin� Design: L S Groun Elise Streeb, IALD, LEED AP Principal and Partner elise .IsAighting .5 Historic Rehabilitation: llabor John Feinberg Johnna,thecoll� ive ncornor I iveinc.net Electrical, Plumbi Engineer: Additions and Deletions Report for AIA Document B132 — 2019. Copyright ©1992, 2009, and 2019>. All rights reserved. "The American Institute of Architects," "American Institute of Architects," "AIA," the AIA Logo, and "AIA Contract Documents" are trademarks of The American Institute of Architects. This draft was produced at 12:08:12 ET on 03/05/2024 under Order No.4104244733 which expires on 08/21/2024, is not for resale, is licensed for one-time use only, and may only be used in accordance with the AIA Contract Documents® Terms of Service. To report copyright violations, a -mail docinfo@aiacontracts.com. User Notes. (1949855081) 3 DocuSign Envelope ID: 78C73221-D4C0-4583-B31&DB918C79BOM .6 Community Engagement, Site Planning, Land Use Preparation, Landscape Architecture: Design Workshop Jessica Garrow Principal Planner and Community Engagement Speciali i �arrowa des i Lnworkshon . com .7 Development and Operational Consulting: Meriwether � Immersed Doug Winter VP of Operations Garrett Simon Partner simon(mmeriwetherco. com .8 Restaurant Plannin Ricca Design Studio Consultin Jeremy Kittelson Principal �kittleson(,neca.com .9 All Electric Food Service Frontier Ener�y Todd Bell Senior Proiect Manager tblgfrontierenerg. & Food Service Design: eration and Facili .10 Sustainability and Enerav Modeling Consulting: Group 14 Engineering Laura Charlier Sustainability Director lcharliergaroup 14eng com .11 Civil Enarineerina: Roaring Fork Engineering Richard Goulding, PE Principal richardgrfeng biz PAGE 7 Design Sunnort: Architect shall maintain the following insurance until termination of this Agreement. If any of the requirements set forth below are in addition to the types and limits the Architect normally maintains, the Owner shall pay the Architect as set forth in Section 11.9. The Architect's liability shall be limited to the policy limits identified in § 2.6.1. — 2.6.6. Additions and Deletions Report for AIA Document B132 — 2019. Copyright ©1992, 2009, and 2019>. All rights reserved. "The American Institute of Architects," "American Institute of Architects," "AIA," the AIA Logo, and "AIA Contract Documents" are trademarks of The American Institute of Architects. This draft was produced at 12:08:12 ET on 03/05/2024 under Order No.4104244733 which expires on 08/21/2024, is not for resale, is licensed for one-time use only, and may only be used in accordance with the AIA Contract Documents® Terms of Service. To report copyright violations, a -mail docinfo@aiacontracts.com. User Notes. (1949855081) DocuSign Envelope ID: 78C73221-D4C0-4583-B31C-DB918C79B06A § 2.6.1 Commercial General Liability with policy limits for each occurrence and �-$--Three Million Dollars ($ 3, damage. of ����s�s-t�-a�—�.��—Two Million Dollars ($ 2,000,000.00 ) 000,000.00 ) in the aggregate for bodily injury and property § 2.6.2 Automobile Liability covering vehicles owned, and non -owned vehicles used, by the Architect with policy limits of +'��� t��—�—One Million Dollars ($ 1,000,000.00 )per accident for bodily injury, death of any person, and property damage arising out of the ownership, maintenance and use of those motor vehicles, along with any other statutorily required automobile coverage. § 2.6.5 Employers' Liability with policy limits One Million Dollars ($ 1,000,000.00 )each and One Million Doll § 2.6.6 Professional Liab with policy limits of� Two Million Dollars ($ PAGE 8 • r • • •� � - • - • �. . .00 )policy limit. E 1,000,000.00 .. • �� � 1 v �• ility covering negligent acts, errors and omissions in the performance of professional services to�,r �r r� : v,or „� •m nr� r� One Million Dollars �$ 1,000,000.00 )per claim and 2,000,000.00 ) in the aggregate. 2.6.9 The Architect shall provide to �uirements in this Section 2.6 pri eacn requlr cancellation additional c Application r -tificates of insurance evidencing compliance with the Work and thereafter upon renewal or replacement of policy of insurance. Owner shall receive written notice at least 3 0 da` for to nonrenewal or f policies required by this Section 2.6, or 10 days prior notice due to nonpayment of premium. An tificate evidencing continuation of professional liability coverage shall be submitted with the final �r Payment. Information concerning reduction of cover on account of claims bald under the nolicv shall be furnished by the Architect with reasonable promptness. The certificates will show the Owner as an additional insured on the Comprehensive General Liability, Automobile Liability, umbrella or excess polici § 2.6.10 Governmental Immunity: The parties hereto understand and waive or intend to waive by any provision of this contract, the monetary agree that Owner is relying on, and does not imitations (,presently $350,000.00 per person t • 1 and $1,093,000 per occurrence) or anY Ot. Governmental Immunity Act, Section 24- to Owner, its officers, or its employes. munities, and protections provided by the Colorado C.R S.,_ as from. time to time amended, or otherwise. available 2.6.11 Owner's Insurance: The parties hereto understand that the Owner is a member of the Colorado isk Sharing Agency (CIRSA) and as such participates in the CIRSA olicies and manual are inspection during normal business hours. coverages offered by CIRSA. Owner shy participation in an Additional In and/or General 38121 2.6.12 1 . 1 A. Owner shall their den is on�oi er m ui� 're the . , .,.. i 1 Finance Deaartmen no representations w ,nable notice of and ,-., >n�oin� operations) and ISO CG 20 40 12 19 (,completed operations leductible: The Architect shall pay any amounts not covered under on the insurance policies provided by the Architect. pert_y/Casualty Pool. Copies of the �d are available to Contractor for >oever with respect to specific ides in its membership or al Contractor to include Architect as ut of the Construction Manama . ,. T,.., .-. � ,... ,. „ Architect's bolicies because of a § 3.1 The Architect's Basic Services consist of those described in this Article 3 and include usual and customary structural, mechanical, and electrical engineering services. Services not set forth in this Article 3 are Supplemental or Additional Services. The initial contract includes services as described herein and in referenced exhibits: Exhibit A, CCY Architects�roposal dated December 18, 2023; Exhibit B, CCY Architects Fee Schedule; Exhibit C, City of Aspen Reguest_for Proposals project 2023-404: Aspen Armory Hall Remodel and Reuse. The initial contract includes: Part l : Copceptual/Schematic Design Part 2: Support for the Land Use Application and nevi Part 3 : Design _Development Additions and Deletions Report for AIA Document B132 — 2019. Copyright ©1992, 2009, and 2019>. All rights reserved. "The American Institute of Architects," "American Institute of Architects," "AIA," the AIA Logo, and "AIA Contract Documents" are trademarks of The American Institute of Architects. This draft was produced at 12:08:12 ET on 03/05/2024 under Order No.4104244733 which expires on 08/21/2024, is not for resale, is licensed for one-time use only, and may only J be used in accordance with the AIA Contract Documents® Terms of Service. To report copyright violations, a -mail docinfo@aiacontracts.com. User Notes: (1949855081) DocuSign Envelope ID: 78C73221-D4C0-4583-B31C-DB918C79B06A proval Documents -recordation support nstruction Documents �� • r• • • • �- . �. Construction Administration .' •' 411 6 Aocuments ling ired afor the a 3.1.9 The Architect, if requested Manager. § 3.2.1 The Architect shall review the program and other information furnished by the Owner and/or Construction Manager, and shall review laws, codes, and regulations applicable to the Architect's services. �_ • •LU WSE IN X&A K, �lication Process governmenav val of tal authorities hi the Owner, shall assist the Owner in intervi jurisdiction over the Pro�eci. ink and selecti the Construction § 3.2.3 The Architect shall present its preliminary evaluation to the Owner wand/or Construction Manager and shall discuss with the Owner and Construction Manager alternative approaches to design and construction of the Project. The Architect shall reach an understanding with the Owner and Construction Manager regarding the requirements of the Proj ect. § 3.2.4 Based on the Project requirements agreed upon with the Owner, the Architect shall prepare and present, to the Owner wand/or Construction Manager, for the Owner's approval, a preliminary design illustrating the scale and relationship of the Project components. PAGE 10 § 3.2.5.2 The Architect shall consider with the Owner and/or the Construction Manager the value of alternative materials, building systems and equipment, together with other considerations based on program and aesthetics, in developing a design for the Project that is consistent with the Owner's program, schedule, and budget for the Cost of the Work. § 3.2.6 The Architect shall submit the Schematic Design Documents to the Owner wand/or the Construction Manager. The Architect shall meet with the Owner and/or Construction Manager to review the Schematic Design Documents. § 3.2.7 Upon receipt of the Owner and/or Construction Manager's review comments and cost estimate at the conclusion of the Schematic Design Phase, the Architect shall take action as required under Section 6.4, and request the Owner's approval of the Schematic Design Documents. If revisions to the Schematic Design Documents are required to comply with the Owner's budget for the Cost of the Work at the conclusion of the Schematic Design Phase, the Architect shall incorporate such revisions in the Design Development Phase. PAGE 11 the Construe Construction Documents. ion • ON. O S r. !. v, .menu Phas Archi u u 1 meet wi s • I • •fwFLJLJL VW In • r ISL Aar F •, rior to the conclusion 4 Additions and Deletions Report for AIA Document B132 — 2019. Copyright ©1992, 2009, and 2019>. All rights reserved. "The American Institute of Architects," "American Institute of Architects," "AIA," the AIA Logo, and "AIA Contract Documents" are trademarks of The American Institute of Architects. This draft was produced at 12:08:12 ET on 03/05/2024 under Order No.4104244733 which expires on 08/21/2024, is not for resale, is licensed for one-time use only, and may only be used in accordance with the AIA Contract Documents® Terms of Service. To report copyright violations, a -mail docinfo@aiacontracts.com. User Notes. (1949855081) DocuSign Envelope ID: 78C73221-D4C0-45831111111B31C-DB918C79B06A § 3.4.4 Pfief to Upon receipt of the Construction Manager 15 s information and an estim sion of Construction Documents Phase, the Architect sVa pangs. .- take action as rewire Construction Documents. d the Ila am wS ;!job Procurement ;ase ervices — of included in Basic Services, may be added by amendment to contract in the e futur. PAGE 12 § 3.6 Construction Phase Services see Not included in Basic Services, may be added by amendment It future. PAGE 15 § 4.1 Supplemental Services — Architect is providing services described in CCY described in proposal may be provided as an additional service. / I ! I / • _ Y .MW_� I. I_-1_1_1?RlJflil�ll ��nl.)A)4��a1_L-1.1�a9atn,9lR-171-/�a-I a�_1-1af.19 tS\_171 l��w�la�al(_�a!�l�waaaa\� ��Jas �9'L!7a!i!47l•1�a1! Procurement ;ase ervices — of included in Basic Services, may be added by amendment to contract in the e futur. PAGE 12 § 3.6 Construction Phase Services see Not included in Basic Services, may be added by amendment It future. PAGE 15 § 4.1 Supplemental Services — Architect is providing services described in CCY described in proposal may be provided as an additional service. / I ! I / • _ Y .MW_� I. I_-1_1_1?RlJflil�ll ��nl.)A)4��a1_L-1.1�a9atn,9lR-171-/�a-I a�_1-1af.19 tS\_171 l��w�la�al(_�a!�l�waaaa\� ��Jas �9'L!7a!i!47l•1�a1! • _ Y .MW_� I. I_-1_1_1?RlJflil�ll ��nl.)A)4��a1_L-1.1�a9atn,9lR-171-/�a-I a�_1-1af.19 tS\_171 l��w�la�al(_�a!�l�waaaa\� ��Jas �9'L!7a!i!47l•1�a1! ��nl.)A)4��a1_L-1.1�a9atn,9lR-171-/�a-I a�_1-1af.19 tS\_171 l��w�la�al(_�a!�l�waaaa\� ��Jas �9'L!7a!i!47l•1�a1! 'Rooker r=rWrc ����aa��a1..► • • _ . • ��-�•a W . . . _ . _ • �i7 wo aE/'L!'a!i �•�ic!9Pfft ���R�•)� A19•14tR71 ntract in the Additions and Deletions Report for AIA Document B132 — 2019. Copyright ©1992, 2009, and 2019>. All rights reserved. "The American Institute of Architects," "American Institute of Architects," "AIA," the AIA Logo, and "AIA Contract Documents" are trademarks of The American Institute of Architects. This draft was produced at 12:08:12 ET on 03/05/2024 under Order No.4104244733 which expires on 08/21/2024, is not for resale, is licensed for one-time use only, and may only 7 be used in accordance with the AIA Contract Documents® Terms of Service. To report copyright violations, a -mail docinfo@aiacontracts.com. User Notes. (1949855081) DocuSign Envelope ID: 78C73221-D4C0-45834331C-DB918C791:106A Wil All 1ME 01IM11116M. M&IMP019life MW^ . 4 • 1 1 . WwablaMOVEI IIIII . . . . • "�-CM r7 WOW nsWAWA \n141M!iR R•�UL-1 AWJ RV!!•!'l\!ela T\a Email! - -"TM MA11M ., NEW . • 'irk'rSET'7:.—JlR_-J�J\`\7\\\!t\,R!371�J\Al�•SI�R!:'�i!LM Kill TA �l-J.l ism 'i r�.r�f7"fw—RJRLS�t\'tt!7E!l•�171�/\ttop \!�.Jl!- ` fT31101WI c 1W'�J�L-1 L7}l-J�`Ma-J-AM•A. 9 101 • 9 • • RONNIE rrrr'rr-r�NEW. #ma\as!���1'\!��a\ "BE \Eaw�dlw.!IfNII \fs!i l • ..Mft.Y .. .. . . . .. .. _ . . _ •. _ ` fIII VISA Off "W L4\l-J �.1-lMI l-agwj%,=l� 'LlW,i—l�M\��O1-1!' �. . Will!WE mr.rV515M. r►•O�'YU r Y' ff OR 6i . 44 .•.Y 11'i 1 \J .+JK V {.1 iL11� 7L • 1 • 1 i 0 _ r 1 imM i z/z��i/z-r�•i/U�• 1I�i�1J+i-11•1J�// .8 Preparation for, and attendance at, a public presentation, meeting or h��hearing with the ex of those described in CCY's nronosal. Exhibit A.: .12 Assistance to the Initial Decision Maker, if other than the Architect. .13 Requested revisions to the design and/or drawings to comply with the Owner's bud; et that are material changes to work completed and approved in the previous phases of work. § 4.2.2 4=e-If constructionphase services as described in Section 3.6 are added to basic service through written amendment of this agreement to avoid delay in the Construction Phase, the Architect shall provide the following Additional Services, notify the Owner with reasonable promptness, and explain the facts and circumstances giving rise Additions and Deletions Report for AIA Document 13132 — 2019. Copyright ©1992, 2009, and 2019>. All rights reserved. "The American Institute of Architects," "American Institute of Architects," "AIA," the AIA Logo, and "AIA Contract Documents" are trademarks of The American Institute of Architects. This draft was produced at 12:08:12 ET on 03/05/2024 under Order No.4104244733 which expires on 08/21/2024, is not for resale, is licensed for one-time use only, and may only be used in accordance with the AIA Contract Documents® Terms of Service. To report copyright violations, a -mail docinfo@aiacontracts.com. User Notes. (1949855081) DocuSign Envelope ID: 78C73221-D4C0-4583-B31C-DB918C79B06A to the need. If, upon receipt of the Architect's notice, the Owner determines that all or parts of the services are not required, the Owner shall give prompt written notice to the Architect of the Owner's determination. The Owner shall compensate the Architect for the services provided prior to the Architect's receipt of the Owner's notice: .1 two (2 )reviews of each Shop Drawing, Product Data item, sample and similar submittals of the Contractors .2 twen ( 20 ) visits to the site by the Architect during construction .3 two ( 2) inspections for any portion of the Work to determine whether such portion of the Work is substantially complete in accordance with the requirements of the Contract Documents .4 one ( 1) inspections for any portion of the Work to determine final completion 'BD upon addition of construction _phase services by written amendment. � 4.2.5 If the services covered bps this agreement, through no fault of the compensated as Additional Services. S scope to the date of the amendment. PAGE 18 5.17 The Owner shall provide the Ai previousl,�ompleted work on can rely on the accuracy of the i Services. PAGE 19 ent have not been completed within eighteen Architect, extension of the Architect's services b e_ added through written amendment shall reset ings" ar Ct S Wl existing (18) months of the date of and that time shall be IN 4 Mql 4 is time frame conditions as necess ). The Architect within their Basic § 6.6 If the Owner chooses to proceed under Section 6.5.3, the Architect, without additional , compensation provided the requested changes are not materially chan�in� the scope of previously completed and approved work, shall incorporate the revisions in the Construction Documents Phase as necessary to comply with the Owner's budget for the Cost of the Work at the conclusion of the Design Development Phase Services, or the budget as adjusted under Section 6.5.1. Revisions to the drawings that are material changes to the scope of previously completed and approved work shall be compensated as an additional service. The Architect's revisions in the Construction Documents Phase shall be the limit of the Architect's responsibility under this Article 6. PAGE 20 § 8.1.3 The Architect shall indemnify and hold the Owner and the Owner's officers and employees harmless from and against damages, losses and judgments arising from claims by third parties, including reasonable attorneys' fees and expenses recoverable under applicable law, but only to the extent they are caused by the negligent acts or omissions of the Architect, its employees and its consultants in the performance of professional services under this Agreement. The extent nf+Li.� ern]%1+Aar%+9v n%�tn����r� 4� 1"Anv""i%r �r L�IA ��rm�oc.c� +Ldc% %i�:mor mnx7p Uo �o�orr�iv�o� �r��Q� n or+Ue, A rnl,i�or.4�n I or fault has been determined by adjudication, alternative dispute resolution, or otherwise resolved by mutual agreement between the Architect and the Owner or any indemnity obligee. The Architect's obligation to indemnify and hold the Owner and the Owner's officers and employees harmless does not include a duty to defend. The Architect's duty to indemnify the Owner under this Section 8.1.3 shall be limited to the available proceeds of the Architect's insurance coverage required by this Agreement. Architect's duty to indemnify Owner is limited to the same extent Owner's liability is limited under the Colorado Governmental Immunity Act, Section 24-10-101 et sea.. C.R.S.. PAGE 21 Additions and Deletions Report for AIA Document B132 - 2019. Copyright ©1992, 2009, and 2019>. All rights reserved. "The American Institute of Architects," "American Institute of Architects," "AIA," the AIA Logo, and "AIA Contract Documents" are trademarks of The American Institute of Architects. This draft was produced at 12:08:12 ET on 03/05/2024 under Order No.4104244733 which expires on 08/21/2024, is notfor resale, is licensed for one-time use only, and may only 9 be used in accordance with the AIA Contract Documents® Terms of Service. To report copyright violations, a -mail docinfo@aiacontracts.com. User Notes. (1949855081) DocuSign Envelope ID: 78C73221-D4C0-4583-B31 C-DB918C79BMA Litigation in a court of competent jurisdiction ' , r r •CoLf ajLjLj HILH-1019.1105 raflfm 11AXi• ' , r • • - • • _ han 28 dgys written notice,Owner shallpay to the Architect the following i�T�c3 ._ • P6354,610000 art 4: • • •, • • 11 Mark�u• . rei refers. mark- Architec A and B If the ; Archit adi ust( hit l ,1 111 c _ 0 I ■I I!, I I N 11 1 1 -1 so sc..� 244.842 ,renced fees are further described in attached Exhibit A, CCY Architects Exhibit.B,_CCY Architects Fee Schedule -FINAL 1 estimated reimbursables as described in attached Exhibit B, CCY Architects Fee Schedule -FINAL. The invoice amounts shall not be marked uL). In the event that there is a conflict between fees outlined in Exhibit ibi reflect the Architect's and their team' Fee Schedule® Exhibit B- FINAL. n completed within 50% of the durations provided in the e Architect's, the estimated top sets described above shall b ual adiustments to their hourlv rate schedules urovided in C Additional services__m_ gybe added by written amendment Additional services may be added Britten amendmen § 11.4 Compensation for Supplemental and Additional Services of the Architect's consultants when not included in Sections 11.2 or 11.3, shall be the amount invoiced to the Architect plus seven and one half percent ( 7.5 %), or as follows: Additions and Deletions Report for AIA Document B132 — 2019. Copyright O 1992, 2009, and 2019>. All rights reserved. "The American Institute of Architects," "American Institute of Architects," "AIA," the AIA Logo, and "AIA Contract Documents" are trademarks of The American Institute of Architects. This draft was produced at 12:08:12 ET on 03/05/2024 under Order No.4104244733 which expires on O8/21/2024, is not for resale, is licensed for one-time use only, and may only 1 be used in accordance with the AIA Contract Documents® Terms of Service. To report copyright violations, a -mail docinfo@aiacontracts.com. User Notes. (1949855081) DocuSign Envelope ID: 78C73221-D4C0-4583-1331 C-DB918C791306A to EXhlbl Schedule -FINAL CY Architects ►�1�J♦•.14 t!i L7 ��/•��1�1 J!9♦♦\ I♦ll♦��•[!9♦1�I PAGE 25 Refer to Exhibit .3 CCY Archite �osal dated December 185 2023 and Exhibit B, CCY Archite( 0 -0� Decelnber_l8,_2023 and Exhibit B, CCY Architects Fee Schedule :4—Printing, reproductions, plots, and standard form documents; :5--.4 Postage, handling, and delivery; —.5 Expense of overtime work requiring higher than regular rates, if authorized in advance Owner; by the .6 Renderings, physical models, mock-ups, professional photography, and presentation materials requested by the Owner or required for the Project; .8--.7 If required by the Owner, and with the Owner's prior written approval, the Architect's consultants' expenses of professional liability insurance dedicated exclusively to this Project, or the expense of additional insurance coverage or limits in excess of that normally maintained by the Architect's consultants; —.8 All taxes levied on professional services and on reimbursable expenses; n--.9 Site office expenses; :�--1--.10 Registration fees and any other fees charged by the Certifying Authority or by other entities as necessary to achieve the Sustainable Objective; and 12 .11 Other similar Project -related expenditures. § 11.8.2 For Reimbursable Expenses the compensation shall be the expenses incurred by the Architect and the Architect's consultants plus ten percent ( 10 %) of the expenses incurred. PAGE 26 § 11.10.1.1 An initial payment of Fifty Thousand ($ 50,000 ) shall be made upon execution of this Agreement and is e minimum payment under this Agreement. It shall be credited to the Owner's account in the final invoi he ce. on § 11.10.2.1 Unless otherwise agreed, payments for services shall be made monthly in proportion to services performed. Payments are due and payable upon presentation of the Architect's invoice. Amounts unpaid thirty( days after the invoice date shall bear interest at the rate entered below, or in the absence thereof at the legal rate prevailing from time to time at the principal place of business of the Architect. ei ht.� een % 18% 30 ) Additions and Deletions Report for AIA Document B132 — 2019. Copyright ©1992, 2009, and 2019>. All rights reserved. "The American Institute of Architects," "American Institute of Architects," "AIA," the AIA Logo, and "AIA Contract Documents" are trademarks of The American Institute of Architects. This draft was produced at 12:08:12 ET on 03/05/2024 under Order No.4104244733 which expires on 08/21/2024, is not for resale, is licensed for one-time use only, and may only be used in accordance with the AIA Contract Documents® Terms of Service. To report copyright violations, a -mail docinfo@aiacontracts.com. User Notes. (1949855081) • • • • • • •� _ • •' all d Mml"�!gmlo -d ro I• i- -•-'� axes or Colorado State or local sales or use taxes. The Owner's State of Colorado tax identification number is M4557. The Owner's Federal Tax Identification Number is 84�6000563311 t relationship. Ar forts to provide tl services on behalf of the Owner. No agent, employee, or servant of Architect shall be, or employee, agent or servant of the Owner. Owner is interested only in the results obtained manner and means of conductinz the work are under the sole control of Architect. None o �thin� �hitect shall e said seemed to be, the is contract. The .a.&, er to tbe.. minloyees. Wgnts or servants of Architect. Architect shall be solelK,,j*id lettirelv responsible for its acts and for the acts of Architect's agents, employees, servants and consultants duriur= the performance of this contract. Architect shall indemnify Owner against all liability and loss in connection with, shall assume full responsibility for payment of all federal, state and local taxes or contributions imposed or required under nem 1 zment insurance~ social security and income tax law. with respect to Architect and/or Architect's -persons and/or 12.3 Notice. Any written notices as called for herein may be hand delivered to the respective •dd- -d •- • •' 11 -i • ''r -d 11_ Ml_ -_ 1 �� _i • Owner: City Manager City of Aspen 427 Rio Grande Place Aspen, Colorado 81611 With a copy to. James R. True, Esg . City Attorney, 427 Rio Grande Place Aspen, Colorado 81611 § 12.4 Non -Discrimination. No discrimination because of race, color, creed, sex, marital status, affectional or sexual orientation, family responsibility, national origin, ancestry, handicap, or religion shall be made in the employment of uersons to perform services under this contract. Architect agrees to meet all of the requirements of Owner's municipal code, Section 13-98. inina to non-discrimination in lovment. § 12.5 Waiver. The waiver by the Owner of any term, covenant, or condition hereof shall not operate as a waiver of any subsequent breach of the same or any other term. No term, covenant, or condition of this Agreement can be waived except by the written consent of the Owner. Forbearance or indulgence by the Owner in any regard whatsoever shall not constitute a waiver of any term, covenant, or condition to be performed by Architect to which the same may apply and, until complete performance by Architect of said term, covenant or condition, the Owner shall be entitled to invoke any remedy available to it under this Agreement or by law despite any such forbearance or indulgence. 12.6 Execution of Agreement by Owner. This agreement shall be binding upon all parties hereto and their respective heirs, executors, administrators, successors and assigns. Notwithstanding anything to the contrary contained herein, this Agreement shall not be binding upon the Owner unless duly executed in accordance with the requirements of the Owner's municipal code by the Mayor of the Ci of Aspen, or a duly authorized official in his absence, following approval of City Council. 12.7 Consultant shall comply with any reasonable request by the Colorado Department of Labor and Employment made in the course of an investigation that the Colorado Department of Labor and Employment undertakes or is undertaking pursuant to the authority established in Subsection 847.5402 (5), C.R.S. Additions and Deletions Report for AIA Document B132 — 2019. Copyright ©1992, 2009, and 2019>. All rights reserved. "The American Institute of Architects," "American Institute of Architects," "AIA," the AIA Logo, and "AIA Contract Documents" are trademarks of The American Institute of Architects. This draft was 7 2 produced at 12:08:12 ET on 03/05/2024 under Order No.4104244733 which expires on 08/21/2024, is not for resale, is licensed for one-time use only, and may only be used in accordance with the NA Contract Documents® Terms of Service. To report copyright violations, a -mail docinfo@aiacontracts.com. User Notes. (1949855081) DocuSign Envelope ID: 78C73221-D4CO- 4583-B31C-DB918C79BWA and any other documents requiring a signature hereunder, maybe signed electr� Parties. The Parties agree not to den. the he legal effect or enforceability of the § 12.8 If Consultant violates Subsection 847.5402, C.R. anv provision of the Public Contract for S. the Owner may terminate this Aareerr Services pertain ent. If this pertaining to the duties imposed ement is so terminated, Consultant shall be liable for actual damages to the Owner arising out of Consultant's violation of Subsecti 8-17.5-102, C.R.S. �12.9 It is aareed that neither this ent nor anv of its terms. brovisions. conditions can be modified, changed, terminated or amende instrument fully executed by the parties. 12.10 If any of the provisions of this a G. superseded or exten entations or covenants ement shall be held invalid, illegal or unenforceable i ropriate written 1111�JGL11 LlllVQ.11Ul�y, 1�.+�,A.11l.y V1 1+111V1VVQ.V111LY V1 CLllY Vl.11b+l �.J1VV1rJ1V11. 12.11 Electronic Signatures and Electronic Records This Agreement and any amendments hereto may be executed in several counterparts, each of which shall be deemed an original, and all of which together shall constitute one agreement binding on the Parties, notwithstanding the possible event that all Parties may not have signed the same counterpart. Furthermore, each Party consents to the use of electronic signatures by either Party. The Scope of Work, red to b, j� the electronic form or because an electronic record was used in its formation. The Parties agree not to object to admissibility of the Agreement in the form of an electronic record, or a paper copy of an electronic documej paper copy of a document bearing an electronic si signature or that it is not in its ori�i on the grounds that it is an electronic record or el form or is not an original. • I I I. • I I I • I I I I . . I • MINES* T ems_.ftwo. • . . %jj . - _ xhibit 7 i Architects Schedule .- . 4MIermt the MQW • .. i .. ,77 .. - . .. • . Y. • • • • • • AIL • _ - . - • . - - I • . I . . . ♦ I I . . . . / • . 1 • I • I r • ?J71r13112NAMRM 24��1�11111�1�iIJt�1��L1�1TSr1�2�1I�:�1�1L1s�s��i'•J47I�12113�=?L�1-1'•1MJ�1�1.1L�i!!r�!'� ��.�iT: Sim. . .. = . ♦ Ashen Reuse. J c r sacs: Princi en Armory Hall Remodel and Additions and Deletions Report for AIA Document B132 — 2019. Copyright ©1992, 2009, and 2019>. All rights reserved. "The American Institute of Architects," "American Institute of Architects," "AIA," the AIA Logo, and "AIA Contract Documents" are trademarks of The American Institute of Architects. This draft was produced at 12:08:12 ET on 03/05/2024 under Order No.4104244733 which expires on 08/21/2024, is not for resale, is licensed for one-time use only, and may only 13 be used in accordance with the AIA Contract Documents® Terms of Service. To report copyright violations, a -mail docinfo@aiacontracts.com. User Notes. (1949855081) DocuSign Envelope ID: 78C73221-D4C04583-1331C-DB918C791306A L;enwcarion or j Fo AI AO Document D40100 1.ttached final document simultaneously with its associated Additions and Deletions Report and this certification at 2:08:12 ET on 03/05/2024 under Order No. 410424473' ) from AIA Contract Documents software and that in I tandard Form of Agreement Between Owner and Architect, Construction Manager as Adviser Edition, other than os ifions and deletions shown in the associated Additions and Deletions Report. (Title AIA Document D401 — 2003. Copyright ©1992 and 2003. All rights reserved. "The American Institute of Architects," "American Institute of Architects," "AIA," the AIA Logo, and "AIA Contract Documents" are trademarks of The American Institute of Architects. This document was produced at 12:08:12 ET on 03/05/2024 under 1 Order No.4104244733 which expires on 08/21/2024, is not for resale, is licensed for one-time use only, and may only be used in accordance with the AIA Contract Documents® Terms of Service. To report copyright violations, e-mail docinfo@aiacontracts.com. User Notes: (1949855081) ARMORY HALL remodel + reuse ARCHITECTURE & DESIGN SERVICES PROPOSAL PREPARED FOR CITY OF ASPEN PROJECT #2023-404 December 18, 2023 Aspen has defined our firm for over fifty years. We live, work, and play in the Roaring Fork Valley. We live the Aspen Idea, bringing a holistic approach into our work and our play. Intellectual, creative, and physical renewal have always been at the core of our work and studio. Founded in the Elks building in the 1970s, we know the heart of Aspen is found in those rare spots where locals and the community can come together to celebrate the day, forge new connections, and create lasting memories. We welcome the opportunity to leverage our experience to craft the next great community living room, where a new generation of locals can gather and revel in the magic of Aspen. We believe in the power of the design process to uncover opportunities beyond our first inclinations, while still bringing deep experience to the table to inform the solution. Our expertise in creating durable community gathering spots – the Nell, the Limelight, Elk Camp and the Sundeck, among many others – alongside our understanding of the care required to appropriately adapt and re-use historic buildings allow us to approach the Armory with a broad understanding of the challenges ahead. Our approach to design is honest, progressive, and explorative. The emphasis we place on our collaborative, listening-based approach allows for the integration and consideration of the community, the natural environment, and the health and wellness of the people who use and love the spaces we create. We’ve assembled a consultant team that not only deeply reflects these values and passions, but also brings significant experience on the development and operational side. The following pages reflect who we are, relevant work we’ve done, and our proposed approach to The City of Aspen’s Armory Hall. We hope you find it informative, and we look forward to continuing the conversation with you. Thank you for the opportunity. -- CCY Team TABLE OF CONTENTS 5.1.A OVERVIEW OF THE FIRM | WHO WE ARE Firm’s Financial Stability Letter 5.1.B RELEVANT TEAM EXPERIENCE | WHAT WE’VE DONE Select Awards & Publications Select Clients 5.1.C DESIGN CAPABILITIES | WHAT WE PROPOSE 5.1.D IN-HOUSE PERSONNEL DEDICATED TO THE PROJECT 5.1.E PROPOSED CONSULTANTS/ENGINEERS 5.2 PROPOSAL ELEMENTS 5.2.A Scope of Services 5.2.B Fee Worksheet 5.2.C Detailed Schedule 5.2.D Design Process Coordination / Quality Control CCY REFERENCES & CERTIFICATE OF LIABILITY INSURANCE APPENDIX 03 11 12 24 25 26 27 31 39 40 43 44 44 45 46 WHO WE ARE QUALIFICATIONS: 5.1.A OVERVIEW OF CCY ARCHITECTS DESIGN IS OUR PASSION Design is our passion. We live and breathe it. We create inspired and original design solutions that connect people to place, nature, and each other in meaningful, memorable ways. Our forward-looking designs speak to the legacy and traditions present in the heritage of all places. Our curiosity thrives through uncovering those through-lines and weaving them into our work. MOUNTAIN COMMUNITY EXPERIENCE IS AT OUR CORE We understand firsthand the outdoor lifestyle and community experience. Community building is not just one of our “market sectors,” it is at the core of what we do. CCY has over five decades of experience creating memorable places in the Roaring Fork Valley. Our work is geographically diverse, ranging across the Rockies and the Sierras, throughout the American West, and beyond. Our rare blend of custom residential and resort experience lends us a particular lens on a crafted, intimately scaled approach to larger buildings. Our office cul- ture encourages projects of different types and scales to learn from one another. We don’t have sector-based studios. The teams that design homes also design community and resort amenity buildings. OUR APPROACH IS ROOTED IN LISTENING AND COLLABORATION We have a listening-based approach. We are very accustomed to “being at the table” early in the envisioning process for new and evolving projects. We are designers that think well beyond individual buildings and truly focus on creating places that drive memorable experiences. 5.1.A OVERVIEW OF CCY ARCHITECTS PHILOSOPHY OF DESIGN IN A HISTORIC CONTEXT Our approach to design stems from a belief that architecture should be reflective and derivative of its place. Whether a site is remote wilderness on which to nestle a private retreat, or an in-fill project in the heart of a historic mountain town, our approach is the same: understand the place, its history and context, and respond to the constraints and opportunities it presents. A solution within a historic context should not merely imitate the past; rather, it should learn from and respect it. The design should be responsive, acknowledging the scale, proportions, and texture of its historical setting. Above all, it should celebrate the historic resources, with any additions paying homage to, deferring to, and complementing the existing structures instead of mimicking them. We have extensive experience working within the historic context and complex design constraints and criteria of Aspen. Our projects in the commercial core and the West End embody this design approach philosophy, with recent examples such as the Victorian Music Box and Katie Reed both earning City of Aspen Historic Preservation Awards for outstanding contributions to historic preservation. Telluride Transfer, an in-fill mixed-use project, MOLLIE Aspen, Obermeyer Place and Limelight are prime examples of how a project can successfully respond to its surrounding context and constraints while still looking forward. 5.1.A OVERVIEW OF CCY ARCHITECTS Pictured below from left to right: 1. Historic Elks Building. 2. Aspen Gondola Terminal, Plaza, and the Little Nell Hotel 3. CCY’s firm founders - Copeland, Finholm, Hagman & Yaw -“four hippies” who came to Aspen in the early 1970’s to ski and do architecture. This is them enjoying Aspen’s 4th of July parade, hanging outside their Elks Building office window.. Respecting the past while creating design solutions for the future WHO WE ARE | CCY’s SELECT PROJECT LOCATOR WITHIN THE ASPEN CORE CCY is proud of the various projects we’ve undertaken over the years and as seen highlighted on the locator map. 5.1.A OVERVIEW OF CCY ARCHITECTS ASPEN COMMUNITY: SIGNIFICANT ADAPTIVE REUSE PROJECTS We see complex design as an opportunity - in our experience, design constraints are the foundation to great design solutions. It’s not just about building structures; it’s about harmonizing with the spirit of the place. Our firm has a rich history in Aspen, contributing to numerous legacy projects in the core and throughout the Roaring Fork Valley. In 1990, CCY led the historic rehabilitation and adaptive re-use of Aspen’s Elks Building. Our firm served as the Design and Architect of Record for the Aspen Gondola Terminal and Plaza, as well as the Little Nell Hotel - known as “the front porch of Aspen.” This development redefined the community’s economic core, stretching it from the pedestrian malls to the base of Aspen Mountain. The Hotel Jerome - Addition is another standout historic reuse project for CCY. Our firm was hired to design a complementary addition to the original brick building built in the 1880s. Historic compatibility and visual separation were the guiding concepts for this major addition to The Hotel Jerome, located in the heart of Aspen. The completed design reflects many traditional elements of Aspen’s architectural heritage, it interprets rather than mimics historic precedent. The new garden and patio orient toward the south and host numerous summer gatherings. Included in the addition are a swimming pool, garden room, ballroom, meeting facilities and underground parking facilities as well as a significant increase in guest rooms. Design constraints are the foundation to great design solutions Pictured left & right, The Hotel Jerome - Addition: THE STRENGTH OF OUR CONSULTANT TEAM We’ve assembled a distinctive array of specialized teams to address project operations and sustainability goals, leveraging their expertise in F&B, restaurant, and food hall experiences. Ricca Design Studios: Internationally recognized for sustainable culinary design, extensive food hall experience, blending proven F&B concepts with cutting-edge innovation. Frontier Energy: Experts in energy-efficient commercial kitchens, providing audits and design support, guiding us on electric cooking equipment and water-efficient ware washing. Group14: Authorities in sustainable design, energy efficiency, LEED, and third-party certifications. They bring a unique mix of energy design assistance, commissioning, and advanced software analytics. Immersed Group | Meriwether: Food Hall specialists offering a business and operator’s perspective. Invaluable resource for insights on operating costs and development. 5.1.A OVERVIEW OF CCY ARCHITECTS “This destination promises a truly unforgettable experience” Pictured below and right hand page: 1.Parlor Kansas City - Immersed | Meriwether launched the Parlor food hall concept in 2017 with the purchase of a historic building in the Crossroads neighborhood of Kansas City, MO. 2. Once a historic lumber warehouse, Ricca’s Sawmill Market in Albuquerque, NM is now a 25,000 square-foot diverse and bustling food hall that celebrates local cuisine and culinary traditions. Sawmill Market in Albuquerque, NM ENVIRONMENTAL STANDARD OF CARE Environmental Stewardship & Wellness are central to our practice. Driven by site conditions, our solutions allow us to optimize a building’s design for its environmental conditions. We implement solutions that rely on both passive and active strategies to minimize the impact on the local and global environment, and we seek to positively affect the local ecology through our site interventions. We have clarified our Environmental Standard of Care over the last several years to respond more directly to the evolving climate crisis. We have identified three major pillars that serve as a framework for project goal-setting, and a bridge between design vision and physical architectural solutions: • Resilience & Relevance, the research and implementation of anticipatory design solutions to create generational solutions • Human Health & Comfort, the responsibility to create spaces that support the health of the occupants and the highest level of comfort • Regeneration of the Local Ecology, or the idea that we can leave a site better than we found it through active restoration and purposeful intervention High Performance & Smart Design are additional focal points of our work. A high- performance building excels in multiple areas simultaneously. This is a building that’s more comfortable, more efficient, and more thoughtfully prepared to confront an uncertain future. With a reverence for the natural world and a deep commitment to the occupant experience, our projects combine inspiration from the landscape with time tested design strategies to create buildings that serve their occupants, communities, and the planet. Performance is not about making trade-offs between outcomes, but about employing well researched, creative solutions that result in an all-around better building. 5.1.A OVERVIEW OF CCY ARCHITECTS 5.1.A OVERVIEW OF CCY ARCHITECTS EMBRACING EXPERIENCE + PLACE An important part of our process is working closely with our clients and consultants to unlock ideas, programming, and designs to evolve a project’s vision and move it forward. This involves getting deep into the specifics of the experience we’re creating and how the physical space supports that experience. Our approach to design stems from a belief that architecture and interiors should complement and be derivative and reflective of their place. Whether it be an on-mountain restaurant or an in-fill project in the heart of a historic mountain town, the approach is the same: understand the place, its history and context, and respond to the constraints and opportunities with a vision. We believe place-based design can rekindle our everyday awareness of the natural world and create evocative buildings and interior spaces that are intellectually and emotionally engaging. DESIGN CHARRETTE We begin all of our projects with a design charrette, an intensive, on-site work session with the CCY team, owners, consultants, and stakeholders. During the charrette, we address the overall vision and guiding principles for the project as well as the programming and architectural and interior design character. We will develop initial design concepts, space planning, material palette, and site strategies. The charrette process generates a shared understanding of the goals, challenges, and the physical vision of the project and a broad consensus among all stakeholders. CULTURE OF DESIGN + COLLABORATION Design collaboration at CCY doesn’t stop at the charrette. You will see design reviews in our office often. Presenting an idea helps clarify design. Critiquing and evaluating recognizes strengths and weaknesses, pushing the best design solutions to the top. Iteration is fundamental to our process, and involves every team member from clients to designers to engineers. Collaboration through all phases of a project achieves deeper solutions faster. The way we live and work produces better results. We embrace a causal work atmo- sphere and believe a cross-country ski or biking at lunch fuels the mind as much as the body. A balanced healthy lifestyle, encouraging intellectual curiosity and growth and a strong dose of fun helps all of us do our best work. Aspen Art Museum CCY Architect of Record | Shigeru Ban - New York Studio, Design Architect BASALT | 137 Midland Avenue | P.O. Box 349 Basalt, Colorado 81621 | 970-927-3101 | Fax 970-927-8049 ALPINEBANK.COM | EQUAL HOUSING LENDER NMLS#414674 | MEMBER FDIC December 12, 2023 City of Aspen 427 Rio Grande Place Aspen, CO 81611 RE: CCY Architects Leter of Reference To Whom it May Concern: CCY Architects has been an account holder with Alpine Bank for the past 16 years. They are a valued client of Alpine Bank, and have always handled their accounts as agreed. Upon occasion we have had the opportunity to review their financials in depth, and we are confident in sta�ng that as an architecture firm, CCY is currently and has historically been financially stable. Respectfully, Jennifer Sauer Senior Vice President – Manager jennysauer@alpinebank.com Annie Mitchell - Burlingame WHAT WE’VE DONE QUALIFICATIONS: 5.1.B RELEVANT TEAM EXPERIENCE ELK CAMP RESTAURANT | Snowmass, Colorado CCY Scope: Architecture, Interior Architecture, and Interior Finishes CCY was the design and architect of record. Accessed by a scenic 9-minute gondola ride originating from Snowmass Base Village, Elk Camp was named “Best On-Mountain Restaurant” in North America by Skiing magazine. The restaurant achieved LEED Silver certification for its sustainable merits. Elk Camp is a winter dining venue and summer base camp situated at the top of Elk Camp Gondola. It not only played a pivotal role within the visionary plan for Snowmass Mountain but also stands as a signature building for Snowmass, exemplifying the Aspen Skiing Company brand. Its distinctive curved roof design, inspired by the principles of harmoniz- ing with nature and snow sports, earned Elk Camp Restaurant the title of “the best on-mountain restaurant in North America” by Skiing Magazine. This architectural marvel offers a truly memorable and multi-generational experience. The Great Room can accommodate up to 250 guests, act as a special event venue and is served from an open scramble servery. An adjoining lounge provides a warm and intimate gathering space, which opens up to a large south-facing terrace overlooking Snowmass Mountain slopes. The curved design is rooted in several key principles: it establishes a connection to nature and adventure, integrates form-making that exudes energy, and creates a memorable experience, aligning perfectly with the values of the Aspen Skiing Company. SIZE: 4 Acres | 20,500 TSF 250-Seat Great Room 75-Seat Children’s Dining Area 150 Exterior Seats VALUE: $390/SF CONTACT: Chris Kiley, Aspen Skiing Company Planning Dept ckiley@aspensnowmass.com CCY TEAM: Rich Carr, Susan Touchette, Matt Smith CONSULTANTS: KL&A Engineers, REG Engineers 5.1.B RELEVANT TEAM EXPERIENCE Project of Similar Size Mountainous Setting Restaurant | Food & Beverage Community Hub Sustainability MOLLIE | Aspen, Colorado CCY Scope: Architecture and Interior Architecture. CCY was the Design and Architect of record on this project This hotel is a reinvigoration of the Molly Gibson Lodge that comes from the 1950’s era of Aspen. The design takes cues from the Mid-century design attitude in Aspen. With a prominent location on Main Street in the heart of Aspen’s historic West End, the architecture strikes a balance between a progressive forward looking solution that also relates in scale and proportion to its Victorian neighbors. The hotel uses an efficient average room module of 225 sf to maximize keys within the allowable development rights. The hotel will offer a new fresh and affordable product for the Aspen community. SIZE: 35,669 SF VALUE: N/A CONTACT: Michael H Brown, HayMax Capital 605 W Main Street, Suite 2, Aspen, CO 81611 | (970) 544-4187 SHAW Construction was the contractor CCY TEAM: Todd Kennedy, Jenny Trumble, Martin Jones, John Cottle CONSULTANTS: BG Buildingworks, REG Engineers, LS Group 5.1.B RELEVANT TEAM EXPERIENCE LIMELIGHT HOTEL | Aspen, Colorado CCY Scope: Architecture and Interior Architecture CCY was the Design and Architect of record on this project Currently owned by the Aspen Skiing Company, the Limelight was devel- oped by its previous owners as a moderately priced, family owned operation. Designed with a generous living room and adjacent kitchen and bar the hotel operates more as an oversized bed and breakfast than a 100+ key hotel. When Aspen Skiing Company took over operations we worked with them to remodel the lobby, transformed the kitchen into a small commercial kitchen and reinvented the space as a “living room for the community”. A hub of the community, the Limelight creates the coveted dynamic of cur- rent hoteliers of gathering guests and community members in a common space creating a more authentic and vibrant mountain town experience for both. SIZE: 93,000 SF with 128 Hotel Rooms VALUE: $260 SF CONTACT: Travis Bossow, RA Nelson was the contractor #970.963.3558 CCY Team: John Cottle; Robin Schiller CONSULTANTS: KL&A Enginners, LS Group Mountainous Setting Restaurant | Food & Beverage New & Remodel Community Hub Mountainous Setting Restaurant | Food & Beverage Sustainability BUTTERMILK BASE | Aspen, Colorado CCY Scope: Architecture, Interior Architecture, Interiors FF&E, Master Planning in collaboration with DesignWorkshop. CCY was the design and architect of record The overall project’s masterplan included three buildings that were designed to create a campus and to support and enhance the guest experience from arrival to departure. They include: Buttermilk Mountain Lodge, Guest Services, and The Hideout. With an eye toward optimizing energy performance, sustainable design strategies generate efficient and high-performance buildings at Buttermilk. The Buttermilk Mountain Lodge remodel converted commercial kitchen equipment to electric where possible, with a phased plan to replace all natural gas equipment over time. Complete window replacement with U-.24 glazing and solar shades was implemented to reduce heat gain and summer cooling loads. Guest Services is an all electric building. It will function as net-zero once the local utility completes their targeted transition to renewable source power. Guest Services also uses passive solar design and performs 26% better than code, based on ASHRAE 90.1-1. Construction achieved greater than 76% total waste recovery through re-use or recycling. Less than 24% of the project’s total construction material was disposed of at the local land fill. Indoor air quality is maintained with low VOC finishes, frequent outdoor air changes, operable windows, air-locked entry vestibules, and walk-off grates that reduce dust by 85%. SIZE: Buttermilk Mountain Lodge: 21,500 SF | Skier Services: 9,700 SF | Hideout: 7,384 SF VALUE: Lodge Remodel $436 SF | Guest Services: $764 SF CONTACT: Dana Dalla Betta, Senior PM Planning & Development, Aspen Skiing Company ddallabetta@aspensnowmass.com M: 970-456-6601 CCY TEAM: Rich Carr, Chris Touchette, Martin Jones, Jola Pieslak CONSULTANTS: Ricca Design Studios, BG Buildingworks, DesignWorkshop, Roaring Fork Engineers, LS Group 75% of direct sunlight buffered by brise soleil 3pm summer solstice 3pm summer solstice direct sunlight allowed to enter building 3pm winter solstice 3pm winter solstice crawl - space (distribution) retail rental ticketing day lounge 17” deep electric heat pump delivers heat to structure 5.1.B RELEVANT TEAM EXPERIENCE Project of Similar Size Mountainous Setting Restaurant | Food & Beverage Remodel Sustainability KATIE REED | Aspen, Colorado CCY Scope: Architecture, Interior Architecture, and Interior Finishes CCY was the design and architect of record (remodel) This mixed-use commercial property in the center of Aspen is home to multiple bustling businesses— three popular restaurants, a bar, and several leased offices—but over the years, it kept inching toward disrepair. Looking for an aesthetic upgrade and in need of functional improvements, the owner hired CCY to modernize the property. The property comprises two structures: an original Victorian house, which is framed by an L-shaped building that was completed in the early 1990s. The assemblage is designated as an historic land- mark by the City of Aspen’s Historic Preservation Commission, meaning that any changes to the exteriors needed to be carefully scrutinized in alignment with the original design. For the building from the 1990s, we replaced the dated green wood siding with new black wood sid- ing. Flashing and fascia details were simplified to remove visual distraction and highlight the promi- nence of the Victorian house. For the older historic house, distracting brick planters were removed replaced with new steel-plate versions that allow for better drainage. The design also updated the main entrance and public lobby interiors, creating a more cohesive experience for restaurant visitors and employees. At the entry, a new soffit constructed out of the same steel used for the planters, leads into the main elevator and stair. To complement the steel soffit, interior walls were clad in warm wood tones with textural details. AWARDS: Aspen Historical Preservation Recognition SIZE: 19,000 SF VALUE: N/A CONTACT: Brikor Construction was the contractor #970.923.3088 CCY TEAM: Rich Carr, Jenny Trumble 5.1.B RELEVANT TEAM EXPERIENCE Community Restaurant | Food & Beverage Historic Project of Similar Size Mountainous Setting SAM’S | Snowmass, Colorado CCY Scope: Architecture and Interior Architecture CCY was the design and architect of record for the remodel Sam’s, the newly remodeled and re-branded 7,270 SF on-mountain restaurant, is Aspen Snowmass’ newest dining experience offering a fine dining atmosphere with a lively ski-in bar culture. This extensive transformation creates a fresh space and experience, with minimal architectural changes and adherence to a modest budget. The Aspen Skiing Company wanted to create the premier on-mountain dining experience in the snow sports industry by repositioning their former BBQ restaurant, Sam’s Knob at Snowmass, to be a contemporary alpine trattoria. The dining room is open to the charcuterie kitchen and surrounded by table-to-ceiling glass on the remaining three sides, while a floating wine storage wall casually subdivides the space for a private dining area. Outdoor tables and soft seating gathered around an exterior fire- place fill out the offering from a sunny, southwest facing deck surrounded by mountain peaks. SIZE: 7,270 SF VALUE: $358 SF CONTACT: Dana Dalla Betta, Senior PM Planning & Development, Aspen Skiing Company ddallabetta@aspensnowmass.com | M: #970-456-6601 CCY TEAM: Susan Touchette, Chris Touchette, Jenny Narrod CONSULTANTS: REG Engineers, LS Group Mountainous Setting Restaurant | Food & Beverage Remodel Sustainability MOONLIGHT BASIN ULERY’S LAKE LODGE | Big Sky, Montana CCY Scope: Site Planning, Architecture, Interior Architecture, Interior Finishes, FF&E Design and Specifications CCY was the design and architect of record. Set in a stretch of wilderness, just north of Yellowstone National Park, Ulery’s Lake is a new neighborhood within Moonlight Basin, a residential club affiliated with the Big Sky ski resort. Looking to create an unparal- leled family-oriented experience combining recreation and luxury, the developers of Ulery’s Lake hired CCY to design a guest lodge with 16 private residences as well as a collection of contemporary cabins. This private resort, with immediate access to both Ulery’s Lake and skiing, also offers 11,600 sf of amenities, including a 68-seat restaurant and bar area; pool and outdoor terrace seating, a den, fitness center, gear outfitter, half- size basketball court, and rock-climbing wall. CCY identified a material palette—wood, stone, steel and fiber cement panels—that created consistency across the community, but subtle variations give each set of buildings its own unique identity. A glulam column and beam structure was selected for all the buildings. The honesty of the big boned, expressed structure has a subtle but prevalent tie to Montana’s heritage. LEED Certified SIZE: 10.4 Acres | Lodge 62,716 SF VALUE: GMP budget: $31,873,409 CONTACT: Christina Calabrese - Lone Mountain Land Company ccalabrese@lonemountainland.com | #406.219.0825 CCY TEAM: John Cottle, Jenny Narrod, Melanie Grant CONSULTANTS: KL&A Engineers 5.1.B RELEVANT TEAM EXPERIENCE Retail Restaurant | Food & Beverage Sustainability Community Hub Mountainous Setting 5.1.B RELEVANT TEAM EXPERIENCE TREEHOUSE KIDS ADVENTURE CENTER | Snowmass, Colorado CCY Scope: Architecture, Interior Architecture, and Interior Finishes CCY was the design and architect of record. In collaboration with Intrawest and the Aspen Skiing Company, CCY designed Hayden Lodge, which blended two unique building programs: fourteen high-end residences and a state-of-the-art children’s center called “The Treehouse,” housing a bustling youth ski school program and day-care center. The crisp articulation and detailing represent the refined palette of the building’s residential units, while the base of the building captures the spirit and whimsical qualities of the Treehouse Kids Adventure Center. In 2020, CCY worked with the Aspen Skiing Company on the renovation of the interior space, aiming to improve the initial arrival experience, health and wellness of visitors and employees, and to create a space that aligns with the updated brand aesthetics. The project delivery for the remodel was carried out in close concert with the project team’s operational schedule. The design team managed construction administration within a compressed time line, working during the ski resort’s off-season to ensure an on-time and on-budget delivery. Conceptual design began in April 2020, immediately following the COVID-19 lock-down, a mere 7 months before the required opening in November 2020. The carefully selected material palette implemented throughout the Treehouse redesign not only creates a vibrant and engaging interior environment but also provides durability and resilience in a space highly trafficked with people and ski gear. The newly reconfigured spaces exceed the goals and expectations that were established at the beginning of the project and align with Aspen Skiing Company’s sustainability vision as a company. SIZE: 49,660 TSF (2007) 25,000 SF Treehouse Kids Adventure Center | 7,000 SF Remodel Scope for the Treehouse (2020) VALUE: Interior Redesign/Re-Model ( 2020) Approx. $242 SF CONTACT: Dana Dalla Betta, Senior PM Planning & Development, Aspen Skiing Company ddallabetta@aspensnowmass.com | M: #970-456-6601 CCY TEAM: Rich Carr, Chris Touchette, Susan Touchette, Courtney Woller CONSULTANTS: BG Buildingworks Redesign / Remodel Sustainability Project of Similar Size Mountainous Setting GRIFFIN CLUB | Los Angeles, California CCY Scope: Architecture and Interior Architecture CCY was the design and architect of record for the remodel Following a major repositioning, the Griffin Club Los Angeles unveiled its new clubhouse in the summer of 2017. Originally founded in 1926, the revamped private club is in the geo- graphic center of West Los Angeles and offers a full range of both indoor and outdoor amenities. The new club is casual while still providing best-in-class amenities and service without pretense. SIZE: 36,000 SF of interior, conditioned space VALUE: NA CONTACT: Garrett Simon, Meriwether Companies gsimon@meriwetherco.com | #970-596-6642 CCY TEAM: Rich Carr, Maura Trumble, Matt Smith Remodel Restaurant | Food & Beverage EGLISE LODGE | Yellowstone Club, Big Sky, Montana CCY Scope: Architecture, Interior Architecture and Interior Design CCY was the design and architect of record. Currently under construction, Yellowstone Club’s new on-mountain restaurant, the Eglise Lodge, will serve as the base camp for a 1000-acre ski and summer recreation expansion. The restaurant features a 200-seat dining room. The outdoor terrace to the south connects to sun and skiing while the north side of the building is elevated to capture views. The building’s low sloped shed roofs and simple forms contrast and defer to its surrounding vertical landscape, while a palette of natural and very textural materials pay tribute to Montana’s building history. As a high-altitude fine-dining environment, the interiors program has created a refined experience that would also be resilient to ski equipment and high traffic. To minimize the project’s carbon footprint and to facilitate challenging high-altitude construction at 9,573 feet above sea level, CCY designed the roof structure with Cross Laminated Timbers, or CLT, supported with Glulam columns. In this way, the building further draws from vernacular traditions—in this case, timber-frame structures—but in a 21st century method. SIZE:14,000 SF (Under Construction) Main Dining - 146 seats | Private Dining - 14 seats | Lounge - 26 seats South Dining Terrace- 67 seats | West Terrace - 11 seats Flex Room - 40 seats and Entry Hall with Art Wall VALUE: N/A CONTACT: Boz Boswell, AIA – VP of Architecture, Design, and Planning | Yellowstone Club boz.boswell@yellowstoneclub.com | M: #406.579.1180 CCY TEAM: John Cottle, Jenny Trumble, Matt Smith, Melanie Grant CONSULTANTS: KL&A Engineers, BG Buildingworks Mountainous Setting Restaurant | Food & Beverage Sustainability 5.1.B RELEVANT TEAM EXPERIENCE Project of Similar Size 5.1.B RELEVANT TEAM EXPERIENCE LAKE AVENUE | Aspen, Colorado CCY Scope: Architecture CCY was the design and architect of record for the remodel. Located in Aspen’s West End, this project overlooks Hallam Lake Preserve. Originally built in 1890 for Ella Mitchel the existing house went through numerous non historical remodels and additions. In 2011 CCY began development of a concept working closely with the client and the Historical Preservation Committee that takes the principal historical portion of the house and showcases it closer to the front of the lot. The new addition includes a gabled garage element that fronts the street and is a gestural nod to the historic building. The rest of the addition consists of flat roofs that visually disconnect from the historical building. This addition focuses it’s attention toward the rear of the lot and the views of Hallam Lake and Red Mountain. The living room and kitchen employ operable walls that completely open to the rear of the lot, creating an endless indoor outdoor room. SIZE: 7075 SF VALUE: $426/SF CONTACT: JD Black Construction #970.379.7794 CCY TEAM: Rich Carr, Susan Touchette CONSULTANTS: KL&A Engineers, LS Group, Project of Similar SizeMountainous Setting Remodel/Restoration Sustainability VICTORIAN MUSIC BOX | Aspen, Colorado CCY Scope: Master Planning, Architecture, Interior Architecture, & Historical Preservation CCY was the design and architect of record A modern music-inspired guest house is designed to coexist with a restored 1880s Victorian residence in an historic Aspen neighborhood. The previous owners of the 1880’s Victorian had attached an awkward duplex to the property. The new design removes the additions in order to create a small guest house in the lot’s corner, allowing for a south facing courtyard. The Victorian’s exterior shell is entirely original. The new guest house structure was carefully sistered to the existing Victorian. With the exception of the garage, office, and breakfast room, the Victorian has been refurbished and historically preserved to its nineteenth-century identity. To make the spaces feel larger, the Victorian’s tight rooms are linked with axial connections throughout the home and site, creating an effortless feeling of procession. AWARDS: Aspen Historic Preservation Award RD Architecture Awards | Contextual or Vernacular Renovation AIA Residential Architect Design Awards | Honorable Mention Interior Design, Best of Year | Shining Moment Honoree International Design Awards | Honorable Mention AIA Colorado | Award of Excellence SIZE: 6,800 SF VALUE: N/A CONTACT: KORU was the contractor #970.963.0577 CCY TEAM: John Cottle, Evan Barrett CONSULTANTS: KL&A Engineers, Roaring Fork Engineering Historic Mountainous Setting 5.1.B RELEVANT TEAM EXPERIENCE BRASADA RANCH | Powell Butte, Oregon CCY Scope: Site Planning & Architecture CCY was the design and architect of record Set on 1,800-acres, Brasada Ranch is a low-density, family-oriented community in central Oregon. CCY provided full architectural services, envisioning, programming, and conceptual design for 150 overnight tourist cabins, while sustainably repurposing a nearby abandoned lumber mill for heavy timber. The resort is a leader in sustainable design and was the first in Oregon and fourth in the country to earn LEED Gold certification from the U.S. Green Building Council. Over half of the development’s open space is dedicat- ed to hiking, biking, and equestrian trail networks. The design of the “ranch headquarters” draws inspira- tion from the agricultural vernacular of the region and incorporates contemporary elements. The result is a vibrant heart for the community and a forward-looking architecture that respects the natural surroundings. SIZE: Community Barn 8,000 SF | LEED Gold 2007 Ranch House 13,000 SF | LEED Gold 2008 Post Office & General Store 1,700 SF Recreation Center 17,000 SF Golf Club House & Pro Shop 29,000 SF VALUE: $300-$350 SF CONTACT: Alan Van Vliet, VP Development JELD-WEN Communities | 919.314.7976 Keeton King Construction, Powell Butte, OR 97753 CCY TEAM: Rich Carr, Will Young, Chris Touchette CONSULTANTS: KL&A Engineers, REG Engineers Sustainability Project of Similar Size Restaurant | Food & Beverage LODGE at EDGEWOOD TAHOE | Stateline, Nevada CCY Scope: Architecture and Interior Architecture CCY was the Design and Architect of record on this project The Lodge at Edgewood Tahoe is the first modern hospitality destination situated directly on the shores of Lake Tahoe, culminating from the extensive redevelopment of the existing 240-acre Edge- wood Tahoe Resort. Occupying a half-mile stretch of Lake Tahoe waterfront, this 170,000 square foot, 154-room hotel incorporates substantial enhancements to the historic premises. Notably, the property contributes to environmental enhancement by treating and discharging stormwater from the town of South Lake Tahoe, thereby positively impacting one of the nation’s most carefully-managed ecosys- tems. Additionally, The Lodge has earned a LEED Silver certification. Designed to embrace the ambiance of the Grand Lodges of the American West, the architecture of The Lodge artfully reinterprets traditional elements of Tahoe land-mark designs, resulting in a time- less and contemporary solution. Nestled among majestic Jeffery Pine trees, The Lodge harmoniously complements the existing and cherished Edgewood Clubhouse. With the aim of expanding the resort’s already successful events-site business, its program includes a bistro restaurant and bar, café/ snack shop, Adventure Center, kids camp, meeting rooms, treatment spa, and fitness center. Outdoor amenities abound, offering a patio grill and bar, pool and hot tub, multiple fire features and gathering spaces, an expanded beach with public access, as well as boat facilities and pier on Lake Tahoe. Given the delicate beauty of the Tahoe Basin, the project had to demonstrate extensive environmental benefits to obtain entitlement. It successfully incorporates significant water-quality improvements that buffer and treat stormwater runoff from the golf course and nearby development before reaching the lake. An innovative environmental feature includes a lake source cooling system, married to an extend- ed community water supply pipe that reaches 600 feet below the surface of Lake Tahoe. The system cools the entire building with no fossil fuel consumption. SIZE: 170,000 SF | 154 Hotel Keys | Amenities include: Bistro, Bar/Lounge, Treatment Spa, Retail, Kitchen/Bakery VALUE: $382.00 SF CONTACT: John McLaughlin, CEO - Edgewood Companies | 775-588-3400 CCY TEAM: Rich Carr, Chris Touchette, Robin Schiller CONSULTANTS: KL&A Engineers, Design Workshop, Ricca Design Studio Restaurant | Food & Beverage Sustainability Mountainous Setting TELLURIDE TRANSFER | Telluride, Colorado CCY Scope: Architecture, Interior Finishes, and Master Planning CCY was the design and architect of record Telluride Transfer is a 59,600 SF mixed-use project, including commercial, affordable housing, and free market housing, located in historic Telluride and anchored by the rehabilitation of the Transfer Warehouse, a 120 year-old, collapsing stone structure that will be re-purposed as a community arts facility. Given the town’s national historic landmark status, the project went through arduous public approvals. The result is a development that looks forward, yet respects the historic context of Telluride. The architecture along the public right-of-way recalls the brick facades of Telluride’s past but with a modern sensibility towards the detailing. Along the alley is a eclectic mix of materials and scales to reflect the architectural spirit of Telluride’s alleys. Internally to the site, the architecture becomes more modern and spare in detail, yet the mass, scale, and fenestration still speak to the town’s historic fabric. The Historic Architectural Review process in Telluride creates a very constrained environment for design. Rather than fighting against the system, we studied the guidelines and worked within the process to arrive at a unique solution that was well received by the majority of the community. Ultimately, the constraints placed on the design by the guidelines and the process resulted in a better solution. DESIGN AWARDS: 2023 AIA Colorado Award of Merit Site Use: Before The project resides on the boundary of the Resi- dential Commercial and Warehouse Commercial zone districts. To mitigate the scale and create a visual transition between these two distinct zones, the proposed massing is broken up into five dis- tinct buildings. Site Use: After The pedestrian alleys between the buildings serves to create a permeable site plan that allows for the existing pedestrian flow through the undeveloped property to be maintained. Additionally, they create setbacks between the new construction and the his- toric buildings and provide view corridors through the project to the iconic peaks surrounding Telluride. 5.1.B RELEVANT TEAM EXPERIENCE Historic Component Mixed-Use Sustainability Community Process SIZE: 42,000 TSF (Five Buildings) VALUE: $450 SF CONTACT: Garrett Simon, Meriwether Companies | gsimon@meriwetherco.com | 970-596-6642 Werner Catsman, Finbro Construction | 970-728-5038 CCY TEAM: Rich Carr, Todd Kennedy, Maura Trumble CONSULTANTS: KL&A Engineers, REG Engineers Mountainous Setting OBERMEYER PLACE | Aspen, Colorado CCY Scope: Master Planning and Architecture CCY was the design and architect of record The design challenge for Obermeyer Place was to acknowledge Aspen’s history while looking forward. This mixed-use project was designed with representatives from the approvals agencies, the public, and neighbors actively generating project parameters. CCY Architects was responsible for steering the 15-month community process. It was the first project approved under the City of Aspen’s COWOP process. The result is a noteworthy public-private project. Located on a former railroad yard, Obermeyer Place provides a sophisticated urban mixed-use project that combines service, commercial, office businesses, affordable housing and twenty two for-sale residences. Pedestrian walkways weave through the five buildings and provide access from Aspen’s core to the park and river. Preserved views of the mountains from within the project offer powerful connections to the spectacular surroundings. SIZE: 230,000 SF VALUE: Approx. $43 million CONTACT: Dwayne Romero dromero@romero-group.com | 970-273-3100 CCY TEAM: John Cottle, Alex Klumb, Robin Schiller 5.1.B RELEVANT TEAM EXPERIENCE Community Process Sustainability Mixed-Use Mountainous Setting SELECT AWARDS SELECT PUBLICATIONS 2023 HOSPITALITY DESIGN, “MOLLIE ASPEN TO LAUNCH IN DECEMBER” (MOLLIE - ASPEN) ENKI, “THE ALPINE CABIN” (DNA ALPINE) ARCHITECTURAL RECORD, “FEATURED HOUSE” (DNA ALPINE) INTERIOR DESIGN “ART AND NATURE TAKE CENTER STAGE IN THIS ASPEN RESIDENCE“ (N’VITALE) ASPEN MAGAZINE “DESIGNING WOMEN” (CCY ARCHITECTS) LUXE “A-LIST ART AND MOUNTAIN VIEWS VIE FOR ATTENTION IN AN ASPEN RETREAT” (TERRA) DESIGNBOOM “CCY ARCHITECTS’ MODERN MOUNTAIN HOME EMERGES FROM ASPEN GROVE“ (ELK RANGE OVERLOOK) MOUNTAIN LIVING “COLORADO HOME IS PERFECTLY SITED TO CAPTURE MOUNTAIN OVERLOOK VIEWS” (TR5 RANCH) NUVO “HOME OF THE WEEK” (DNA ALPINE) 2022 WALLPAPER* “THIS SNOWY ROCKIES RETREAT IS THE PERFECT COLORADO FAMILY STAY” (DNA ALPINE) LUXE “CABIN FEVER” (ELK RANGE OVERLOOK) PLAIN MAGAZINE “A MULTI-GENERATIONAL HOUSE NESTLES THE BANKS OF WYOMING’S SNAKE RIVER” (SNAKE RIVER) MOUNTAIN LIVING “THE MUSIC BOX” (VICTORIAN MUSIC BOX) DEZEEN “CCY NESTLES MEADOW HOUSE IN MOUNTAIN VALLEY OUTSIDE ASPEN” (MEADOW HOUSE) DEZEEN “TEN WELL-ORGANIZED BEDROOMS WITH CLEVER STORAGE SOLUTIONS” (GAMMEL DAMM) 2021 ARCHITECTURAL RECORD “FOR THE ARCHITECTS ON YOUR HOLIDAY GIFT LIST” (CCY ARCHITECTS MONOGRAPH) SHLTR “WINTER ESCAPE: EDGEWOOD TAHOE” (EDGEWOOD LODGE LAKE TAHOE) MOUNTAIN LIVING “LISTENING TO NATURE” (CCY ARCHITECTS MONOGRAPH) WHITEWALL “LAND AND SEA” (CCY ARCHITECTS MONOGRAPH) COWBOYS & INDIANS “WELL CONNECTED” (CCY ARCHITECTS MONOGRAPH) ARCHITECTURAL DIGEST “7 OF THE MOST EXTRAVAGANT ASPEN HOMES ON THE MARKET RIGHT NOW” (MEADOW HOUSE) ASPIRE “BOOK NOOK: 9 MELLOW MUST-READS FOR SUMMER” (CCY ARCHITECTS MONOGRAPH) MODERN IN DENVER “DESIGN DIALOGUE” (CCY ARCHITECTS MONOGRAPH) ALTA “NO OCEAN, NO PROBLEM” (CORAL MOUNTAIN) WALL STREET JOURNAL “AMID ASPEN’S MARKET FRENZY - HOME LISTS FOR $37 MILLION” (MEADOW HOUSE) DESIGNBOOM (MEADOW HOUSE) HGTV “TOUR A MAGICAL ASPEN GUEST HOUSE INSPIRED BY CLASSICAL MUSIC” (VICTORIAN MUSIC BOX) PLAIN MAGAZINE “STUNNING VIEWS OF ASPEN MOUNTAIN” (RED MOUNTAIN) AESTHETICA “FUNCTION AND AESTHETICS” (CCY ARCHITECTS MONOGRAPH) 2023 THE AMERICAN ARCHITECTURE AWARDS DNA ALPINE AIA COLORADO, ARCHITECT OF THE YEAR RICH CARR AIA COLORADO, AWARD OF MERIT TELLURIDE TRANSFER AN’S BEST OF PRACTICE - ARCHITECTURE WEST HONORABLE MENTION CCY ARCHITECTS THE INTERNATIONAL ARCHITECTURE AWARDS ELK RANGE OVERLOOK & DNA ALPINE RESIDENTIAL DESIGN ARCHITECTURE, HONOR AWARD DNA ALPINE ARCHITIZER A+ FINALIST, BEST RESIDENTIAL FRIM CCY ARCHITECTS 2022 AIA COLORADO, DESIGN AWARD OF EXCELLENCE DNA ALPINE 2021 AIA WESTERN MOUNTAIN REGION, HONOR AWARD VICTORIAN MUSIC BOX THE INTERNATIONAL ARCHITECTURE AWARDS MEADOW HOUSE AN’S BEST OF PRACTICE - ARCHITECTURE WEST HONORABLE MENTION CCY ARCHITECTS ARCHITIZER A+ ARCHITECTURE AWARDS, FACADES VICTORIAN MUSIC BOX 2020 RESIDENTIAL DESIGN ARCHITECTURE AWARDS, CITATION, VICTORIAN MUSIC BOX ARCHITECT’S NEWSPAPER BEST OF DESIGN, FACADES VICTORIAN MUSIC BOX THE AMERICAN ARCHITECTURE AWARDS MEADOW HOUSE PLATFORM, BEST INTERNATIONAL HOUSES DESIGN SELECTION SERIES, GAMMEL DAMM 2019 AIA RESIDENTIAL ARCHITECT DESIGN AWARDS, HONORABLE MENTION, VICTORIAN MUSIC BOX INTERIOR DESIGN, BEST OF YEAR, SHINING MOMENT VICTORIAN MUSIC BOX AIA WESTERN MOUNTAIN REGION, MERIT AWARD GAMMEL DAMM AIA COLORADO, HONORABLE MENTION HIGH+DRY (UNBUILT) AIA COLORADO, HONORABLE MENTION MEADOW HOUSE AIA COLORADO WEST, AWARD OF DISTINCTION VICTORIAN MUSIC BOX (DETAIL) AIA COLORADO WEST, AWARD OF DISTINCTION MEADOW HOUSE 2018 ULI NEVADA PLACEMAKING AWARD, TRANSFORMATIVE EDGEWOOD LODGE AIA NEVADA, CITATION AWARD EDGEWOOD LODGE AIA COLORADO, AWARD OF EXCELLENCE VICTORIAN MUSIC BOX TRAVEL+LEISURE READER’S CHOICE AWARDS, NO. 1 HOTEL RESORT IN THE U.S. EDGEWOOD LODGE TRAVEL+LEISURE READER’S CHOICE AWARDS, NO. 36 TOP 100 HOTELS IN THE WORLD EDGEWOOD LODGE COLORADO HOME & LIFESTYLE, FIVE UNDER 40 CCY ARCHITECTS - MATTHEW SMITH GOLD NUGGET AWARDS, MERIT AWARD EDGEWOOD LODGE 2017 AIA U.S. WESTERN MOUNTAIN REGION, FIRM OF THE YEAR CCY ARCHITECTS OUTSIDE, TOP 100 BEST PLACES TO WORK IN THE U.S. CCY ARCHITECTS AIA COLORADO, AWARD OF EXCELLENCE GAMMEL DAMM AIA COLORADO, AWARD OF MERIT T.A.G. RESIDENCE AMERICAN INSTITUTE OF ARCHITECTURE AWARD ASPEN ART MUSEUM, ASSOCIATE ARCHITECT 2016 AIA COLORADO, AWARD OF EXCELLENCE GAMBEL OAKS RANCH 2015 AIA COLORADO, HONOR AWARD FIRM OF THE YEAR U.S. GREEN BUILDING COUNCIL, LEED SILVER SNOWMASS ELK CAMP RESTAURANT U.S. GREEN BUILDING COUNCIL, LEED GOLD GAMBEL OAKS RANCH AIA WESTERN MOUNTAIN REGION, HONOR AWARD ASPEN ART MUSEUM, ASSOCIATE ARCHITECT AIA COLORADO, MERIT AWARD ASPEN ART MUSEUM, ASSOCIATE ARCHITECT AIA COLORADO WEST, MERIT AWARD CASTLE CREEK SELECT CCY CLIENTS LONE MOUNTAIN LAND COMPANY - BIG SKY, MT LOWE ENTERPRISES - LOS ANGELES, CA MARTIS CAMP - TRUCKEE, CA MERIWETHER COMPANIES - BOULDER, CO MJM DEVELOPMENT COMPANY - PARK CITY, UT MOUNTAIN AIR COUNTRY CLUB - BURNSVILLE, NC MUJU RESORT - JEONBUK, SOUTH KOREA OBERMEYER - ASPEN, CO OHANA REAL ESTATE INVESTORS - SAN DIEGO, CA / HONOLULU, HI PARK AVENUE DEVELOPMENT - SOUTH LAKE TAHOE, CA PLUMPJACK GROUP - SAN FRANCISCO, CA PRESIDIO VISTA PROPERTIES - LAKE TAHOE, CA QUANTUM PLACE DEVELOPMENTS - CALGARY, CANADA RELATED COMPANIES - SNOWMASS VILLAGE, CO RESORT VENTURES WEST - STEAMBOAT, CO SANTIAM RIVER CLUB - SWEETHOME, OR SNOWMASS CHAPEL & COMMUNITY CENTER - SNOWMASS VILLAGE, CO SUN VALLEY RESORT - SUN VALLEY, ID SUNRISE COMPANY - PALM DESERT, CA SWANER PRESERVE AND ECOCENTER - PARK CITY, UT TAOS SKI VALLEY - TAOS, NM THE LYLE ANDERSON COMPANY - SCOTTSDALE, AZ TIMBERS CLUB - CARBONDALE, CO TOWN OF SNOWMASS VILLAGE - SNOWMASS VILLAGE, CO TOWN OF TELLURIDE - TELLURIDE, CO UNIFRONT - SHANGHAI, CHINA VAIL RESORTS DEVELOPMENT COMPANY - BROOMFIELD, CO WASATCH PEAKS RANCH - UTAH WINDROSE - ASPEN, CO WRIGHT & COMPANY - AVON, CO YELLOWSTONE MOUNTAIN CLUB - BIG SKY, MT AJAX HOLDINGS - ASPEN, CO AMERICAN SKIING COMPANY - PARK CITY, UT ANGEL FIRE SKI AREA - ANGEL FIRE, NM ASPEN ART MUSEUM - ASPEN, CO ASPEN CLUB & SPA - ASPEN, CO ASPEN SKIING COMPANY - ASPEN, CO AUBERGE RESORTS - MILL VALLEY, CA CHAFFIN LIGHT ASSOCIATES - BASALT, CO CITY OF ASPEN - ASPEN, CO CITY OF SOUTH LAKE TAHOE - SOUTH LAKE TAHOE, CA CONSERVATION INTERNATIONAL - ARLINGTON, VA COPPER MOUNTAIN - FRISCO, CO CRESTED BUTTE MOUNTAIN RESORT - MOUNT CRESTED BUTTE, CO DEEP CREEK MOUNTAIN RESORT - DEEP CREEK LAKE, MD DMB - SCOTTSDALE, AZ DUTCH PACIFIC RESOURCES - SISTERS, OR EAGLE CREST RESORTS - REDMOND, OR EAST WEST PARTNERS - AVON, CO EDGEMONT HIGHLANDS - DURANGO, CO EDGEWOOD GROUP - STATELINE, NV EVERIST COMPANIES - SILVERTHORNE, CO GLACIER CLUB - DURANGO, CO HAYMAX HOTELS - ASPEN, CO HINES - HOUSTON, TX HOTEL JEROME - ASPEN, CO INTRAWEST CORPORATION - VANCOUVER, BC JACKSON HOLE MOUNTAIN RESORT - JACKSON, WY JACKSON-SHAW CORPORATION - DALLAS, TX LEGASUS OF NORTH CAROLINA - CASHIERS, NC LEWIS TRUST GROUP - LONDON, ENGLAND DESIGN CAPABILITIESQUALIFICATIONS: JENNY NARROD, AIA LEED AP | PROJECT MANAGER Jenny is a licensed architect in both Texas and Colorado. She brings an unwavering dedication for purposeful and technical design solutions to CCY and has impeccable organization and project management skills. She has coordinated and lead large and complex projects since she has been with the firm. Jenny recently completed the new LEED Certified Ulery’s Lake Lodge at Moonlight Basin Montana. She will be responsible for code compliance, technical performance of the facilities and the integration of engineering disciplines. We have assembled a very strong team for Aspen’s Armory Hall. Partner Todd Kennedy will lead the team, with Rich Carr very involved throughout the project. Both have significant experience in mountain resort and F&B design and have led and delivered some of our most complex and award-winning projects. Jenny Narrod will be Project Manager and Jenny Trumble will fill the role of Project Architect. Jordan Rich will support as Job Captain. JENNY TRUMBLE, AIA | PROJECT ARCHITECT Jenny oversaw the remodel and preservation of Katie Reed, which included a historic cottage and mixed-use building located in downtown Aspen. The work done on this project was recognized by the Aspen Historic Preservation committee. She has also contributed her design talent and technical expertise to many award-winning residences, as well as a private ski and golf community development in Utah. RICH CARR, AIA | ADVISING PARTNER Rich provides an integrated approach to design for each project he leads, synthesizing finely detailed architectural design with a broader focus on place- making for clients in diverse settings. His award-winning portfolio includes land- mark image centers, mixed-use and affordable housing complexes, new resort communities, and nationally acclaimed private residences. Rich will be involved in the project conception, programming, and design. He will serve in an advisory role throughout the later phases of the project. TODD KENNEDY, AIA | PARTNER IN CHARGE Todd will be highly involved in the design from the very start, and his extensive exposure to complex approval processes will be invaluable throughout the pub- lic process. He will also be the ultimate contact person for the City of Aspen, to assure their satisfaction at every stage. Todd is licenced to practice architecture in Colorado and is a member of the AIA. Todd brings a rigorous, detail oriented approach to all of his projects. CCY’S IN-HOUSE PERSONNEL DEDICATED TO THE PROJECT 5.1.D DESIGN CAPABILITIES: PROJECT TEAM 20 weeks 7 public 14 weeks 4 weeks 16 weeks hearings Commence Conclude Name Title Hourly Rate Hours/ Week Fee $'s/Week Hours/ Week Fee $'s/Week Todd Kennedy Partner in Charge $325 9 $2,925 12 $3,900 Jenny Narrod Project Manager $210 18.4 $3,864 24 $5,040 Jenny Trumble Project Architect $210 19.6 $4,116 3 $630 Jordan Rich Job Captain $165 30.4 $5,016 48 $7,920 TBD Architect/Designer $145 14.8 $2,146 0 $0 Rich Carr Partner $325 3.4 $1,105 0 $0 Total CCY Fee $'s per Week $19,172 $17,490 $22,536 $11,500 $22,688 Total CCY Fees $'s Per Phase Enhanced Schematic Part 1a and 1b Land Use Application Design and Review Part 2 Part 4 May 2024 June 2024January 2024 $383,440 $122,430 $315,500 Approval Recordation Part 5 Documents Construction Design Development CCY Architects $46,000 $363,000 time per staff person per week not provided for this phase of work - see proposed fee below time per staff person per week not provided for this phase of work - see proposed fee below time per staff person per week not provided for this phase of work - see proposed fee below Architecture & Overall Project Management Part 3 December 2024December 2024September 2024December 2024 September 2024December 2024June 2024 JORDAN RICH, AIA | JOB CAPTAIN Grounded in a design philosophy centered on placemaking and human-centric response, Jordan brings a unique perspective to each project. Her technical profi- ciency in both Revit and building science enables her to translate creative visions into tangible designs. **Travel time is billed at 70% Schedule shall be adjusted annually based on normal personnel raise policies FIRM CONTACT Name: Todd Kennedy, AIA - Partner Address: 228 Midland Avenue Post Office Box 529 Basalt, CO 81621 Phone: (970) 948-6054 Email: tkennedy@ccyarchitects.com Website: www.ccyarchitects.com Todd Kennedy, AIA Partner EDUCATION Iowa State University Bachelor of Architecture Minor in Environmental Studies PROFESSIONAL AFFILIATIONS American Institute of Architects Urban Land Institute - Colorado, Recreation, Entertainment, Tourism, and Leisure Council Co-Chair 10th Mountain Hut Association Board of Directors PROFESSIONAL REGISTRATIONS Licensed Architect Colorado, Montana, Utah, Wyoming Todd brings passion and rigor to all his work. His detail-oriented and conceptual approach to design have resulted in an award-winning portfolio of projects that each connect his clients with community and nature. In 2019, in recognition of his core leadership role in the studio, he was invited into the firm’s ownership, becoming a key voice in leading the next generation of designers driving forward the firm’s progressive approach to site-specific design. He has successfully executed a wide range of diverse projects, including on-mountain and resort amenity buildings, boutique hotels, mixed-use developments, multi-family residences, and custom homes. An engaged member of the professional and local community, Todd serves as a co-chair of the Colorado chapter of the Urban Land Institute’s Resort, Entertainment, Tourism and Leisure Council. In 2022 Todd served as a jury member for AIA Illinois’ Honor Award Design program. He has been a guest design critic for the University of Colorado and has presented and participated on a number of design panels, including the AIA Colorado Design+Practice Conference, ULI Colorado Symposium, and at the Denver Facades+ conference. Todd also serves on the board of the Tenth Mountain Division Hut Association. Personally committed to the landscapes where he is active as an architect, Todd is a former ultra-athlete and often skis, hikes, and camps with his family. Todd’s work has been recognized with over a dozen design awards from the American Institute of Architects. His projects have been featured in many publications, includ- ing Architectural Record, ArchDaily, Wallpaper*, Dezeen, Dwell, and Metropolis. AIA Western Mountain Region, a six-state professional association representing Arizona, Colorado, Nevada, New Mexico, Utah, and Wyoming, recognized Todd with its pres- tigious AIA10 – Young Architect of the Year Award. He has also been recognized with Colorado Homes and Lifestyle’s Circle of Excellence Award. SELECTED PROJECTS MOLLIE, Aspen, CO Voodoo Lounge Affordable Housing, Telluride, CO Telluride Transfer, Telluride, CO Limelight Hotel | Monarch Condos, Aspen, CO Camels Garden, Telluride CO Moonlight Basin Ulery’s Lodge, Big Sky, MT Private Ski & Golf Community, UTAH Four Seasons, Chongli, CHINA Eglise Lodge, Yellowstone Club, MT PlumpJack Squaw Valley Inn, Olympic Valley, CA New Park Town Center, Park City, UT Mountain Air, Asheville, NC Edgemont Ranch, Durango, CO Deer Valley Recreation Center, Changbaishan, China Kukui Ula, Poipu, Kauai, HI Wild Horse Meadows, Steamboat Springs, CO Building 3ABC, Snowmass Village, CO Swaner EcoCenter, Park City, UT Numerous Private Residences KATIE REED 5.1.D DESIGN CAPABILITIES: PROJECT TEAM Jenny Trumble, AIA Associate Jenny brings an unwavering dedication to purposeful design solutions. She has a passion for creating architecture that tells a powerful story, draws relationships to natural and cultural phenomena, and contributes to the livelihood and productivity of our built environment in a sustainable manner. Upon graduation from the University of Pennsylvania, her appreciation for travel took her to China, where she joined the design team for a diverse set of cultural hospitality projects including a theater and hotel complex in Harbin, and an ecologi- cal exhibition center with a boutique hotel and eco-spa in Beijing. Her time spent overseas helped her hone in on the value of regional context, be it urban or rural, in a global city or a remote landscape. She is thrilled to bring those values back to her home state of Colorado. She received her architecture license in 2016 and has contributed her design talent and technical expertise to many award-winning residences, as well as a private ski and golf community development in Utah. Jenny oversaw the remodel and preservation of Katie Reed, which included a historic cottage and mixed-use building located in downtown Aspen. The work done on this project was recognized by the Aspen Historic Preservation committee. With her strong design insight and ability to think outside the box, she brings thoughtful and innovative solutions to her clients. Jenny engages the profession and commnity by serving on the Arts and Cul- ture Board for the City of Glenwood Springs along with the Practice and Design Conference Committee for AIA Colorado. She has served as a guest speaker and presented at AN’s Facades+ Denver conference and Telluride Art & Architecture week. In 2018 she presented at the Emerging Voices in Architecture - hosted by the Aspen Art Museum. Jenny was also a contributor and an integral team member who worked on CCY’s monograph Connection. EDUCATION PROFESSIONAL REGISTRATIONS SELECTED PROJECTS PROFESSIONAL AFFILIATIONS University of Pennsylvania School of Design Master of Architecture University of Colorado Bachelor of Environmental Design NCARB, Member American Institute of Architects Licensed Architect: Colorado Katie Reed, Aspen, CO Eglise Lodge, The Yellowstone Club, MT DNA Alpine, San Miguel County, CO Coral Mountain, La Quinta, CA Private Ski & Golf Community, UTAH Four Seasons, Chongli, CHINA Meadow House, Aspen, CO Bay to Beach, Southampton, NY Maroon Creek Overlook, Aspen, CO Numerous Private Residences Jenny Narrod, AIA Associate Jenny brings an unwavering dedication for purposeful and technical design solutions to CCY and has impeccable organization and project management skills. She has coordinated and lead large and complex projects since she has been with the firm. Jenny recently completed the new Ulery’s Lake neighborhood at Moonlight Basin Montana, a multi-phase private development that includes a lodge, duplexes and two phases of cabins. The lodge is the neighborhood’s gathering spot, and includes a restaurant and bar, outfitters, children’s program- ming, and a training and conditioning center complete with a basketball court and rock-climbing wall. With her strong design insight and ability to think outside the box, Jenny brings thoughtful and innovative solutions to her clients. Jenny is LEED AP and works with consultants and stakeholders on meeting and exceeding LEED standards. Jenny’s background in dance and the arts provides inspiration to her design process. She has a passion for creating architecture much the way she used to choreograph, by understanding and finding the best movements through space. Jenny recently was recognized by AIA Colorado for an un-built urban housing prototype and site strategy that responds to extreme weather events and fosters community engagement. While at Rice University, Jenny used her fluent Spanish to study and volunteer abroad, often as a translator. Jenny is actively involved with the American Institute of Architects, both regionally and nationally. She also contributes to her community by volunteering time and support to the Aspen Buddy Program and other non-profit organizations. EDUCATION PROFESSIONAL REGISTRATIONS SELECTED PROJECTS PROFESSIONAL AFFILIATIONS Rice University Bachelors of Arts Architecture and Hispanic Studies Bachelors of Architecture American Institute of Architects United States Green Building Council Licensed Architect Colorado, Texas LEED AP BD+C Upper Flat Irons, Big Sky, MT Summit Haus, Snowmass, CO Moonlight Basin Ulery’s Lake Lodge, Big Sky, MT Moonlight Basin, Big Sky, MT Sam’s, Snowmass Mountain, CO Eglise Grip Maintenance, Yellowstone Club, MT PlumpJack Squaw Valley Inn, Olympic Valley, CA Five Trees Residence, Aspen, CO 5.1.D DESIGN CAPABILITIES: PROJECT TEAM Jordan Rich Designer Jordan is a designer with a passion for diverse experiences in architecture, ranging from theme park planning to product design. Grounded in a design philosophy centered on placemaking and human-centric response, Jordan brings a unique perspective to each project. Her technical proficiency in both Revit and building science enables her to translate creative visions into tangible designs. Originally from the East Coast, Jordan made the Roaring Fork Valley her home after earning a Bachelor of Fine Arts in Architecture from the Savannah College of Art and Design. Her design approach is shaped by an immersive arts education and extensive personal travels. With exposure to various cultures and environments, Jordan is committed to creating designs that positively impact lives - provide better quality of life for living. She firmly believes that architecture is an inevitable art form, influencing our daily experiences from the streets we walk to the buildings we pass and the spaces we inhabit. Jordan’s portfolio features custom residential and mixed-use projects. She has navigated the complexities of affordable housing projects, addressing lengthy and intricate permitting processes. Additionally, Jordan’s background includes a sustainability design approach and projects with acoustic awareness, implementing design techniques to minimize sound transmission. Outside the professional realm, Jordan channels her passion into coaching club volleyball and supporting the Carbondale Clay Center. Her holistic commitment reflects a deep belief in architecture’s ability to shape not just physical spaces but also communities and lives. EDUCATION SELECTED PROJECTS Savannah College of Art & Design Bachelor of Fine Art CKC, Telluride, CO Mariposa West, Aspen, CO *Smuggler Affordable Housing, Aspen, CO *Hallam Affordable Housing, Aspen, CO *Riparian Retreat, Aspen, CO *Denotes work experience at previous firms Richard A Carr, AIA Partner Rich is a partner with Cottle Carr Yaw Architects, a firm based in Colorado’s Roaring Fork Valley and widely recognized as a leading voice of design in the American West. His award-winning portfolio includes new resort communities, landmark image centers, mixed-use and affordable housing complexes, and nationally acclaimed private residences. Rich has been an integral leader in many of CCY’s hospitality and recreation projects, including Edgewood Lodge, one of Lake Tahoe’s most premiere resorts, Brasada Ranch, Oregon’s acclaimed recreation community, and a range of projects for the Aspen Skiing Company including the Treehouse Kids Adventure Center, the Elk Camp Restaurant Campus, and the re-envisioned Buttermilk Base Area. With a background in planning, Rich provides an integrated approach to design for each project he leads, synthesizing finely detailed architectural design with a broader focus on place-making for clients in diverse settings. Currently, Rich is leading our design efforts for a new 12,000-acre private ski and golf community in Utah, as well as a 62-key boutique hotel and retreat in the mountains of Southern California. Workforce housing has always been an important aspect of the firm’s work. CCY has worked on over 20 projects with affordable housing components in Aspen, Telluride, and a number of other locations across the west. The firm also has provided pro-bono design services for several Aspen valley community projects, including Habitat for Humanity RFV teacher housing - Basalt Vista, The Art Base in Basalt, and Carbondale Clay Center. In 2023 AIA Colorado named Rich Architect of the Year. CCY was awarded The American Institute of Architects Firm of the Year in 2017 for the six-state Western Mountain Region of the U.S. and has been recognized with over 150 design awards including the ULI’s Award of Excellence. Rich’s work has been recognized in a wide range of national and international publications including The Wall Street Journal, Architectural Digest, Town and Country, Architect, Dwell, Arch Daily and Architectural Record. Rich received his Bachelor of Architecture degree from Cornell University’s College of Architecture, Art and Planning after studies in Berlin and Vienna. EDUCATION PROFESSIONAL REGISTRATIONS SELECT PROJECTS PROFESSIONAL AFFILIATIONS Cornell University College of Architecture, Art & Planning Bachelor of Architecture American Institute of Architects American Planning Association Urban Land Institute, Rec Council - Vice Chair NCARB Licensed Architect California, Colorado, Oregon*, Florida, Maryland*, Montana, Nevada, New York, North Carolina*, Utah, Vermont *Inactive Buttermilk Base Master Plan & Guest Services, Aspen, CO Telluride Transfer, Telluride, CO Snowmass Center, Snowmass, CO Habitat for Humanity - Basalt Vista, Basalt, CO Edgewood Lodge, Lake Tahoe, NV Coral Mountain, La Quinta, CA Wasatch Peaks Ranch, Morgan County, UT Elk Camp Restaurant Complex, Snowmass, CO Treehouse Kids Adventure Center, Snowmass, CO Brasada Ranch, Powell Butte, OR Habitat for Humanity RFV Affordable Housing, Rifle, CO Obermeyer Place, Aspen, CO Snowamss Base Village, Snowmass, CO PlumpJack Squaw Valley Inn, Olympic Valley, CA Moonlight Basin, Big Sky, MT Bay Clubs, Northern & Southern, CA Griffin Club, Los Angeles, CA Palmetto Point Residence, Barbuda, West Indies Wilderness Club, Lincoln County, MT Hayden Lodge, Snowmass, CO Swaner EcoCenter, Park City, UT Chalalan Eco-Lodge, Bolivia Peninsula at St. Kitts, St. Kitts-Nevis Numerous Private Residences 5.1.D DESIGN CAPABILITIES: PROJECT TEAM 5.1.E PROPOSED CONSULTANTS | ENGINEERS The City of Aspen’s vision for the Armory Hall remodel/reuse speaks clearly to a highly sustainable and energy efficient building with the centerpiece of this focus being a flexible community hub for a diverse range of people. We typically work with our clients to develop a process for the selection of our consultants on a project. Given the requirements of the RFP, we have assembled a team of experts we believe can add value to the project and best help us successfully elevate the Armory Hall remodel and reuse to meet the needs of the community. If for any reason one of these team members are not the right fit for the City of Aspen or Armory project, we are open to re-selecting a consultant for a given scope of work. Consultant qualifications and resumes can be found in the Appendix included at the back of this document. MEP Engineers REG Structural Engineers KL&A Civil Engineers Roaring Fork Engineers Technology/Life Safety BG Buildingworks Lighting Design LS Group Land Use Design Workshop Public Outreach Design Workshop Landscape Architecture Design Workshop Historic Rehabilitation The Collaborative Development Consultant Immersed Group | Meriwether Operational/Restaurant Ricca Design Studios Kitchen/Menu/Energy Frontier Energy Sustainability Group 14 Waterproofing Budgeted for - not yet selected TBD Spec Writer Budgeted for - not yet selected TBD Code Budgeted for - not yet selected TBD 5.1.E PROPOSED CONSULTANTS | ENGINEERS 20 weeks 7 public 14 weeks 4 weeks 16 weeks hearings Commence Conclude Name Title Hourly Rate Hours/ Week Fee $'s/Week Hours/ Week Fee $'s/Week Jeremy Kittelson Principal $300 0 $0 0 $0 Lona Homersham Director $200 0 $0 0 $0 Carly Mazle Project Manager $170 0 $0 0 $0 Zoe Beauchamp Revit Associate $140 0 $0 0 $0 0 $0 0 $0 0 $0 0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Total RICCA Fee $'s per Week $0 $0 Total RICCA Fees $'s Per Phase December 2024December 2024September 2024December 2024 September 2024December 2024June 2024 RICCA $29,920 time per staff person per week not provided for this phase of work - see proposed fee below time per staff person per week not provided for this phase of work - see proposed fee below time per staff person per week not provided for this phase of work - see proposed fee below Culinary Desgin Part 3 $24,930 $0 $34,900 Approval Recordation Part 5 Construction DocumentDesign Development Part 4 May 2024 June 2024January 2024 Enhanced Schematic Part 1a and 1b Land Use Application Design and Review Part 2 Ricca Design Studios is an international foodservice design firm headquartered out of Denver, Colorado specializing in front and back-of-house design for all food service-related spaces. With over 50 years of experience and a global footprint on all seven continents, Ricca Design Studios understands the importance of creating spaces that blend with the aesthetic intent, while allowing guests to enjoy and appreciate a distinctive culinary experience. Having projects all over Colorado, including Aspen and other mountain towns, we intimately comprehend the needs and distinct characters of these communities, bring- ing a localized touch to our global expertise. Pioneers in sustainable culinary design, we proudly hold the distinction of being the first LEED-certified culinary design consulting firm in the United States. Setting benchmarks in sustainable, energy-efficient kitchen designs, our understand- ing of net-zero and electrification planning assures the preservation of historical building integrity in every renovation. Our unwavering commitment to environmental stewardship fuels innovative, sustainable solutions within foodservice design. Embracing the challenge of historic renovations with a food hall component, our understanding, drawn from the RFP and market analysis, envisions 2-3 concept-driven spaces requiring exhaust hoods, a ventless concept, and a vibrant bar. Rooted in fun and community, these concepts prioritize affordability and adaptability, designed to evolve seamlessly into new and diverse culinary experiences. With the absence of an Operator on board, Ricca will provide our expertise, guidance, and leadership in program- ming, concepts, operational structure, and affordable menu planning. Our planning practice is led by former Operators with a boots-on-the-ground approach to analysis and planning. We understand that great solutions come from focused, collaborative work. Drawing from our extensive experience and our firm’s commitment to marry form with function, we blend proven concepts with cutting-edge innovations and the latest culinary technologies. Guided by a collective background enriched with deep operational insights, we design spaces that are attractive and prioritize functionality and guest-centric experiences. At the heart of our process is the value we place on the relationships with our clients and design team partners. We under- stand that every successful project is based upon intently listening and collaboration with our design team and stakeholders. We are passionate about foodservice design and our role as trusted guide through the life of the project and beyond. We are grateful for the opportunity to provide a proposal for this amazing project and look forward to being part of the team. FIRM CONTACT Name: Jeremy Kittelson Principal Address: 5613 DTC Pkwy, Suite 100 Greenwood Village, CO 80111 Phone: 303.495.9925 Email: jkittelson@ricca.com Website: www.ricca.com Sawmill MarketSawmill Market SCOPE Food Service Design 6 weeks 0 public 6 weeks 0 weeks 0 weeks hearings Commence Conclude Name Title Hourly Rate Hours/ Week Fee $'s/Week Hours/ Week Fee $'s/Week Todd Bell Sr Program Manager $214 3 $642 $0 6 $1,284 Mark Duesler Program Manager $178 3 $534 $0 5 $890 Karen Ravipaty Administration $80 1 $80 $0 1 $80 Edward Ruan Engineer $168 0 $0 $0 4 $672 Michael Slater Engineer $168 0 $0 $0 5 $840 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Total Frontier Energy Fee $'s per Week $1,256 $0 $3,766 Total Frontier Energy Fee $'s per Phase December 2024December 2024September 2024December 2024 September 2024December 2024June 2024 Frontier Energy time per staff person per week not provided for this phase of work - see proposed fee below time per staff person per week not provided for this phase of work - see proposed fee below Food Service Operation Facility Design Support Part 3 Part 4 $7,536 $0 $22,596 Approval Recordation Part 5 Construction DocumentDesign Development May 2024 June 2024January 2024 Enhanced Schematic Part 1a and 1b Land Use Application Design and Review Part 2 As leaders in the commercial food service (CFS) energy efficiency Frontier Energy staff have helped over 3,000 commercial food service kitchens achieve energy savings. The CFS team provides energy audits and facility design support to industry stakeholders from business operators to kitchen design- ers. Frontier Energy engineers operate a robust ISO accredited appliance testing laboratory which is at the forefront of evaluating the energy and water use of all types of major cooking, ware washing and kitchen ventilation equipment. This testing informs energy efficiency labeling programs like the EPA’s ENERGY STAR® program and national electric and natural gas utilities’ rebate programs for energy efficient CFS equipment like the California Energy Wise Instant Rebate Program. • For this project, Frontier Energy will collaborate with the project’s kitchen architect/designer and other project stakeholders, and will contribute technical support by providing energy use, operating cost, production capacity and practical operating information for the electric cooking equipment considered for the food service operations. • Additionally, Frontier Energy will provide technical guidance for the specification of energy and water efficient ware washing equipment to help minimize hot and cold water demands in the dish rooms • Lastly, through best practice recommendations Frontier Energy will support the design of energy efficient kitchen exhaust systems optimized to ensure capture and contain of cooking effluent or identify ventless cooking appliances or recirculating hood technologies appropriate for the food service operations within the space. FIRM CONTACT Name: Todd Bell Sr. Program Manager Address: PO Box 530293 Atlanta, GA 30353-0293 Phone: 510-444-8707 Email: tbell@frontierenergy.com Website: www.frontierenergy.com SCOPE Food Service Operation Facility Design Support Customer Induction Cooktop DemonstrationAll Electric Large Corporate Campus Kitchen 5.1.E PROPOSED CONSULTANTS | ENGINEERS 20 weeks 7 public 14 weeks 4 weeks 16 weeks hearings Commence Conclude Name Title Hourly Rate Hours/ Week Fee $/Week Doug Winter Vice President Operations $600 2.5 $1,500 0 $0 Immersed / Meriwether Development and Operational Consultant - Will work with our returant consultant to examine the financial feasibility of the concepts and provide day to day operational expertise Enhanced Schematic Land Use Application Design Development Approval Recordation Part 1a and 1b Part 2 Part 3 Part 4 September 2024 Construction Document Design and Review time per staff person per week not provided for this phase of work - see Part 5 January 2024 June 2024 June 2024 December 2024 $0 $0 May 2024 December 2024 September 2024 December 2024 December 2024 time per staff person per week not provided for this phase of work - see time per staff person per week not provided for this phase of work - see Total Fees $'s Per Phase $30,000 $0 $0 We deliver experiences as spectacular as your location. Each of our real estate operations seeks to create an inclusive and inviting community for all generations seeking an adventurous and restorative lifestyle. From our culinary offerings to our curated experiences, like-minded people can connect, refresh, and have fun together. Our vibrant mixed-use, commercial projects generate higher levels of amenity usage and, consequently, greater returns for developers and owners. Immersed Group, the operating arm of Meriwether Companies, is the go-to partner for extraordinary real estate developments. We bring your dream of an exceptional destination to life, combining play, performance, and wellness. Doug Winter, VP of Operations for Immersed Group and Meriwether Company, will be the point person working with CCY and the City of Aspen on the proposed Armory reuse project. Meriwether, through its operating affiliate, Parlor, has pioneered an industry-leading food hall concept with locations in Kansas City and Oklahoma City. We strategically focus on creating and managing additional venues under the Parlor platform, leveraging our team’s expertise in this specific F&B segment. We look forward to providing a study report for the Aspen Armory project, enabling the City Council to evaluate the most sensible operating model for the city and greater community. This evaluation will be based on the projected return on investment and any subsidy that may be required to operate the building. FIRM CONTACT Name: Doug Winter Vice President of Operations for Immersed Group and Meriwether Company Address: 2235 Broadway Boulder, CO 80302 Phone: (303) 408-1990 Email: dwinter@meriwetherco.com Website: www.meriwetherco.com/ operations/ PARLOR - Kansas City SCOPE Food Hall | Mixed-Use Development Consultant 20 weeks 7 public 14 weeks 4 weeks 16 weeks hearings Commence Conclude Name Title Hourly Rate Hours/ Week Fee $'s/Week Hours/ Week Fee $'s/Wee k Lauren McNeill/Libby ColemTeam Leader Sr. Eng III $212 40 $8,480 0 $0 TBD Engineer II $144 40 $5,760 0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Total Group14 Fee $'s per Week $712.00 $0 $510.86 $0 $7,728 Total Group14 Fees $'s Per Phase December 2024December 2024September 2024December 2024 September 2024December 2024June 2024 Group14 Engineering $0 $7,728 time per staff person per week not provided for this phase of work - see proposed fee below time per staff person per week not provided for this phase of work - see proposed fee below time per staff person per week not provided for this phase of work - see proposed fee below Sustaiability Consulting and Energy Modeling Part 3 $14,240 $0 $7,152 Approval Recordation Part 5 Construction DocumentDesign Development Part 4 May 2024 June 2024January 2024 Enhanced Schematic Part 1a and 1b Land Use Application Design and Review Part 2 Established in 1992, Group14 Engineering is a 65+ person consulting firm committed to improving the energy and resource efficiency of buildings. Group14’s suite of services offers resource efficiency solutions across the life-cycle of a building portfolio. We are a recognized authority in sustainable design, energy efficiency, building commissioning, LEED and other third party certification project management. We offer a unique combination of energy design assistance, commissioning of new and existing facilities, and ongoing monitoring of buildings with advanced software analytics. Our firm has completed a number of projects in mountain communities, including 10+ in Aspen, Colorado. The team we’ve assembled brings specific expertise and previous experience aligned with this project; see bullet points below for more details. Laura Charlier is Group14 Engineering’s sustainability team leader. She oversees all Group14’s services related to green building rating systems and embodied carbon analysis including our work on GSA Building 48 – a net zero adaptive reuse project. Lauren McNeill is an experience charrette facilitator and will help the owner and design team align on sustainability goals for the project. She has helped to certify over 100+ LEED projects to date and is presently the project manager for Aspen Distillery, a project seeking the Living Building Challenge in the Roaring Fork Valley. Lauren specializes in building materials with focus on human health, biophilic design principles, and environmental impacts including embodied carbon. Libby Coleman is a professional engineer and senior energy modeler for Group14 Engineering. She specializes in electrification & energy code compliance as evident in her work with City of Denver’s Climate Action Sustainability & Resiliency (CASR) team to develop a Net Zero Energy Resource Hub. FIRM CONTACT Name: Laura Charlier Address: 1325 E. 16th Ave. Denver, CO 80218 Phone: 720-382-1754 Email: lcharlier@group14eng.com Website: group14eng.com SCOPE Sustainability Engineering Aspen Distillery IMMERSED | Meriwether 5.1.E PROPOSED CONSULTANTS | ENGINEERS 20 weeks 7 public 14 weeks 4 weeks 16 weeks hearings Commence Conclude Name Title Hourly Rate Hours/ Week Fee $'s/Week Hours/ Week Fee $'s/Week August Hasz Principal Engineer $250 3.5 #$875 5.7 #$1,429 Zack Gustafson Senior Project Eng $190 3.5 #$665 5.7 #$1,086 TBD Project Engineer $165 7 #$1,155 0 $0 TBD Engineering Drafter $130 3.5 #$455 0 $0 $0 0 $0 $0 1 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Total REG Fee $'s per Week $3,150 $2,514 $8,765 $0 $7,193 Total REG Fees $'s Per Phase December 2024December 2024September 2024December 2024 September 2024December 2024June 2024 REG $0 $115,080 time per staff person per week not provided for this phase of work - see proposed fee below time per staff person per week not provided for this phase of work - see proposed fee below time per staff person per week not provided for this phase of work - see proposed fee below MEP Engineering Part 3 $63,000 $17,600 $122,706 Approval Recordation Part 5 Construction DocumentsDesign Development Part 2 Part 4 May 2024 June 2024January 2024 Enhanced Schematic Part 1a and 1b Land Use Application Design and Review REG will be providing Mechanical, Electrical, and Plumbing Engineering, documentation of the lighting design and energy modeling for system sizing. Our experience spans remote back country huts, complicated historic renovations, municipal buildings, performing spaces, 5-star island resorts, downtown projects with zero lot lines and modern luxury residences. We have the experience and skills to bring a highly coordinated project from design to completion. Previously REG has provided mechanical engineering for the council space within the current Armory Hall, as well as having provided an energy audit of the project along with other build- ings in the City of Aspen portfolio. The City of Aspen has worked closely with REG during our MEP engineering of the Wheeler Opera House remodel for all new HVAC systems throughout and remodeling of the offices and restaurant spaces. We have worked closely with Town Staff in a variety of consulting roles over the last twenty years, most recently as technical advisor for energy code updates and to provide a completely overhauled REMP calculator tool to be adopted into the building code process. Our experience working in Aspen is extensive and includes popular dining and catering projects at the Whitehouse, Ajax Tavern, The Little Nell, Limelight Hotel, Aspen Institute Reception Building, Doerr Hosier Center, and Matsuhisa. We live and breathe energy efficiency, and specialize in designing mechanical and structural systems to achieve aggressive energy goals. In addition to nuts-and-bolts design work, we do computerized building simulation¬—often with our own tools developed in-house to get more accurate results than commercially available tools. We are also active in fieldwork such as com- missioning, re-commissioning, energy auditing, and general troubleshooting to make buildings run better. Our track record renovating historic buildings in Aspen to create state-of-the-art high-performance buildings will provide this team with the experience to achieve the City of Aspen’s aggressive energy goals. FIRM CONTACT Name: August Hasz, President & Principal Address: 426 Belleview Ave, # 201 Crested Butte, CO Phone: 970.713.0984 Email: hasz@reginc.com Website: www.reginc.com Wheeler Opera HouseWhite House Tavern Aspen SCOPE MEP Engineering KL&A Engineers and Builders started in 1994, from the outset a firm that included structural engineers, detailers, and construction managers with the intent to integrate the design process seamlessly with the construction process, starting with steel structures. This vertically integrated process infused our thinking, and when we designed heavy timber, (in our very first project), we naturally worked early with fabricators and erectors to bring economy and elegance to the design. In 2014, after the completion of the Aspen Art Museum, we committed wholeheartedly to a low carbon design ethic. With an office in Carbondale, Colorado, KL&A has extensive experience in the Roaring Fork Valley, many of those projects in collaboration with the CCY team. KL&A performed the historic structural assessment of the Aspen Armory project and is familiar with the complex history of the building. KL&A’s local presence lends to their value on the project, being available for any needs during the construction services phase of the project and has experience on various historical projects in downtown Aspen including Hotel Jerome and the Wheeler Opera House. SCOPE Structural Engineering FIRM CONTACT Name: Dan Doherty, PE Principal & Senior Project Manager Address: 215 North 12th St, Unit E, Carbondale, CO 81623 Phone: 970.927.5174 Email: ddoherty@klaa.com Website: www.klaa.com Wheeler Opera HouseAspen Armory 5.1.E PROPOSED CONSULTANTS | ENGINEERS FIRM CONTRIBUTIONS SUMMARY BG Buildingworks offers a comprehensive suite of technology services designed to enhance the functionality and integration of building systems. Their expertise in Building Technology Systems encompasses a broad spectrum of services, starting with the provision of detailed technology systems specifications and drawings. This foundational aspect ensures all installations and designs comply with industry standards and best practices. BG Buildingworks also excels in coordinating service requirements with local providers and aligning with the preferences of Owner-selected Technology Equipment Vendors, ensuring a seamless integration of technology within the building’s infrastructure. Their services are diverse and specialized, covering areas such as Structured Cabling Systems, Wide Area Communications Systems, Audiovisual Systems, and Electronic Safety & Security Systems. These services range from designing layouts for voice/data/television devices, specifying and laying out wireless AP locations, to more complex tasks like creating Emergency Responder Radio Communications Systems (ERRCS) and cellular booster systems. BG Buildingworks also specializes in the design and implementation of comprehensive audiovisual systems, including background and foreground music systems, conferencing and event setups, and digital signage. Additionally, they offer cutting-edge solutions in security, like designing camera monitoring systems, access control systems, and intrusion detection systems. Alongside these services, BG Buildingworks provides predictive WiFi signal modeling, including heat mapping for optimal access point placement, and works closely with WiFi Equipment Vendors to ensure top-notch wireless connectivity across the building, including guest rooms and designated exterior areas. SCOPE: Tech. Services FIRM CONTACTName: Jeremy Barndt Address: 222 Chapel Place, Suite AC-201, Avon, CO 81620 Phone: 970.949.6108 Email: jdbarndt@bgbuildingworks.com Website: bgbuildingworks.com St. Mary’s Catholic Church Hotel Jerome 20 weeks 7 public 14 weeks 4 weeks 16 weeks hearings Commence Conclude Name Title Hourly Rate Hours/ Week Fee $'s/Week Hours/ Week Fee $'s/Week Eric Rubottom Partner in Charge $257 2 $514 0 $0 Jeremy Barndt Tech Designer $232 14 $3,248 0 $0 Jonathan Snyder BIM Manager $140 5 $700 0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Total BG Fee $$4,462 $0 $14,825 $0 $13,900 September 2024December 2024June 2024 BG Buildingworks time per staff person per week not provided for this phase of work - see proposed fee below time per staff person per week not provided for this phase of work - see proposed fee below time per staff person per week not provided for this phase of work - see proposed fee below Technology Consulting and Predictive Heat Map Part 3 December 2024December 2024 Approval Recordation Part 5 Construction DocumentDesign Development September 2024 Part 4 May 2024 June 2024January 2024 December 2024 Enhanced Schematic Part 1a and 1b Land Use Application Design and Review Part 2 OFFICE LOCATIONS COLORADO NEW MEXICOALBUQUERQUE7007 Wyoming Blvd. NE, Ste. F-2Albuquerque, NM 87109 AVON222 Chapel Pl., Unit AC-201Avon, CO 81620 FORT COLLINS251 Linden St., Ste. 200Fort Collins, CO 80524 DENVER1626 Cole Blvd., Ste. 300Lakewood, CO 80401 Roaring Fork Engineering, Inc. (RFE) is a Civil Engineering firm located in Carbondale, Colorado. Established in 2012, RFE offers services in utility capital improvement planning, design (drainage, land development, transportation, water and wastewater treatment and conveyance), and construction management. RFE’s management team have over 50 years of combined experience in planning, design, and construction experience in the Roaring Fork Valley and the Western Slope. We are currently the on call engineer for Carbondale, Basalt Sanitation District and Brush Creek Metro and have a deep understanding of municipal design and contracting practices in the region. RFE thinks differently about civil engineering in rural Colorado. RFE’s mindset is to provide innovative, sustainable solutions that protect and enhance the natural world while bringing a positive difference to the people and communities where we live, work, and play. We work smarter, faster, and are forward thinking. RFE believes our clients are our valued partners and our client’s goals, business, and future are paramount in our designs and our success. RFE’s professional client relationships are our greatest assets. We gain a significant portion of projects from repeat clients due to our responsiveness, quality of work, and personable relationships with those with whom we work with. RFE will always strive to provide premier value, design, and engineering services to our clients. Roaring Fork Engineering can bring value to the project due to a deep understanding of the City of Aspen standards and familiarity with the processes. RFE has completed several major City projects in the last 5 years, from land use through permitting and completion. We are currently working on the Lumberyard Project for City’s Assets and are familiar with the City staff to collaborate with. As part of the City Offices Project, RFE has reviewed the site, gaining a high-level understanding of the challenges of the Armory. Creative ways to bring a Historic Building structure into ADA compliance and meet the URMP are items we have extensive experience with. FIRM CONTACT Name: Richard Goulding, PE Principal Address: 592 Highway 133 Carbondale CO 81623 Phone: 970.948.7474 Email: richardg@rfeng.biz Website: www.rfeng.biz Pitkin County Ambulance Facility SCOPE Civil Engineering 20 weeks 7 public 4 weeks 4 weeks 16 weeks hearings Commence Conclude Name Title Hourly Rate Hours/ Week Fee $'s/Week Hours/ Week Fee $'s/Week Hours/ Week Fee $'s/Week Richard Goulding Principal $240 0.6 $144 4 $960 4 $960 Danny Stewart Senior Project Manager $213 0.8 $170 3.42857 $730 8 $1,704 Tyler Stevens Project Manager $159 0.3 $48 11.4286 $1,817 15 $2,385 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Total RFE Fee $'s per Week $362 $3,507 $5,049 Total RFE Fee $'s per Phase December 2024December 2024September 2024December 2024 September 2024December 2024June 2024 Roaring Fork Engineering time per staff person per week not provided for this phase of work - see proposed fee below time per staff person per week not provided for this phase of work - see proposed fee below Civil Engineer Part 3 Part 4 $7,242 $24,552 $20,196 Approval Recordation Part 5 Construction DocumentDesign Development May 2024 June 2024January 2024 Enhanced Schematic Part 1a and 1b Land Use Application Design and Review Part 2 5.1.E PROPOSED CONSULTANTS | ENGINEERS Design Workshop has called Aspen home for more than 40 years, having completed more than 280 public and private projects throughout the Roaring Fork Valley. With notable projects such as the Aspen Pedestrian Mall, the Aspen Area Community Plan, the City of Aspen Moratorium, the Aspen Police Station, the Aspen City Offices, and the Aspen Facilities Master Plan, we have helped shape the foundation of the city. Additionally, we are very familiar with the Aspen Armory Hall. Design Workshop completed the Aspen’s Armory Market Analysis in October 2023 to understanding the market and financial feasibility of different use options for the Armory through stakeholder interviews, current conditions analysis and financial modeling. COMMUNITY ENGAGEMENT - Since the first ‘Workshop’ in 1969, the firm has continued to innovate with each generation, leading clients through changing economic and environmental conditions in the pursuit of performance-driven design. We take community involvement seriously on all our projects, offering the following important benefits to our clients: • Ensure all stakeholders have a voice in the public conversation by identifying the geographic, demographic, and interest groups that make up the community. • Provide clear and timely communication to all interested citizens by understanding outreach issues and design approaches that meet the community’s needs. • We ensure that public involvement is meaningful to the community by understanding and focusing on the key issues the community faces. • We create implementable actions by navigating the community to a consensus position. In order to seamlessly and efficiently encourage community participation, we utilize a variety of facilitation techniques. Community engagement is a critical aspect of the Armory project. We will prepare a Plan and Schedule for effective public engagement, referred to as Community Engagement Plan, to build on the success of the city’s previous efforts. We will work with staff to categorize the groups and individuals that have been identified as key stakeholders that should be engaged in the process. We will monitor stakeholder engagement and strategic touchpoints throughout the process to track engagement and metrics. Updates and review of the tracking system, and engagement with targeted stakeholder groups will be assessed at key milestones during the project to ensure adaptability and efficacy of stakeholder engagement. FIRM CONTACT Name: Jessica Garrow Principal Planner Community Engagement Specialist Address: 22860 Two Rivers Rd #102, Basalt, CO 81621 Phone: (970) 925-8354 Email: jgarrow@designworkshop.com Website: designworkshop.com SCOPE Community Engagement Site Planning Land Use Preparation Landscape Architecture LAND USE + STRATEGIC SERVICES - Design Workshop developed an in-house market and economic analysis team, in 1990 Their professionals hold degrees in Business, Real Estate and Finance that expands their expertise to include market research and analysis, feasibility studies, strategy development, implementation advisory and other custom assessments that augment the value and experience for their clients as they navigate land use decisions. The Strategic Services team assists clients in identifying and implementing solutions that enable their real estate assets to better support their financial strategies and land use vision. The best physical plans grow from market demand, and the most sustainable projects are based on realistic analyses of social, economic, fiscal and environmental impacts. Embedding market realities into planning and design solutions allows DesignWorkshop to help clients address the economic benefits and risks inherent in development and conservation, often balancing these forces to resolve conflicting priorities. Given the Armory Hall’s designation on the Aspen Inventory of Historic Sites and Structures and location in the Commercial Core, an HP Major Review will be required, pursuant to Chapter 26.415 in addition to a Commercial Design Review, pursuant to Chapter 26.412. Design Workshop will work directly with the project team to ensure architectural and site planning meet the requirements of these design-based reviews. *DesignWorkshop’s full scope and fee descriptions can be found in the Appendix included at the back of this document. 20 weeks 32 Weeks 14 weeks 4 weeks 16 weeks Commence Conclude Name Title Hourly Rate Hours/ Week Fee $'s/Wee k Hours/ Week Fee $'s/Wee k Hours/ Week Fee $'s/Week Hours/ Week Fee $'s/Week Jessica Garrow Principal Planner CE $275 3.4 $935 3.90625 $1,074 $0 7 $1,925 Darla Callaway Principal LA $275 0.7 $193 $0 1.92857 $530 $0 Ashley Hejitmanek Historic Preservation $200 0.7 $140 0.4375 $88 $0 $0 Max Guzzetta Project Manager $175 5.2 $910 3.46875 $607 3.42857 $600 14 $2,450 Leen Elharake Planner - CE $110 7.75 $853 4.375 $481 4 $440 12 $1,320 Total DW Fee $'s per Week $3,030 $2,250 $1,570 $5,695 Total DW Fees $'s Per Phase Part 1a and 1b Land Use Application Design and Review Part 2 May 2024 June 2024 DesignWorkshop January 2024 $60,600 $72,000 $21,985 Approval Recordation $22,780 Enhanced Schematic December 2024December 2024 Part 5 Construction DocumentsDesign Development September 2024December 2024 September 2024December 2024June 2024 time per staff person per week not provided for this phase of work - see proposed fee below Community Engagement, Site planning, Land Use Preperation Part 3 Part 4 5.1.E PROPOSED CONSULTANTS | ENGINEERS 20 weeks 7 public 14 weeks 4 weeks 16 weeks hearings Commence Conclude Name Title Hourly Rate Hours/ Week Fee $'s/Wee k Hours/ Week Fee $'s/Wee k Sarah Erickson Principal / Partner $275 0.5 $138 1 $275 Elise Streeb Principal / Partner $275 0.25 $69 0.25 $69 Kristen Kordecki Miller Director $225 0.5 $113 0.75 $169 Radhika Kalra Lead Designer $195 0 $0 1.5 $293 Noah Scott Designer $150 0 $0 1 $150 Lin Pizzo Designer $150 0 $0 1.5 $225 $0 $0 $0 $0 Total LS Fee $'s per Week $319 $1,180 $15,000.00 $0 $19,800 Total LS Fees $'s Per Phase Enhanced Schematic Part 1a and 1b Land Use Application Design and Review Part 2 Part 4 May 2024 June 2024January 2024 $6,375 $8,260 $15,000 Approval Recordation Part 5 Construction DocumentsDesign Development LS Group $0 $19,800 time per staff person per week not provided for this phase of work - see proposed fee below time per staff person per week not provided for this phase of work - see proposed fee below time per staff person per week not provided for this phase of work - see proposed fee below Lighting Design Part 3 December 2024December 2024September 2024December 2024 September 2024December 2024June 2024 LS Group provides best-in-class lighting design that elevates any architecture or interior design project. We’re an established, woman-owned lighting design firm that employs a creative, purpose-driven and collaborative approach to lighting and lighting controls. Founded in 2008 in Colorado’s Roaring Fork Valley, we have experience with a wide variety of project types, scales and geographies and are as dedicated to our clients’ success as we are to our own. Our team offers extensive experience that spans multiple project types including award- winning hotels, modern mixed-use development, tech-forward workplaces, community parks and luxury homes. This expertise allows us to streamline the lighting design process by anticipating challenges and mitigating them before they present themselves. Through disciplined coordination with project partners, we ensure that each project’s lighting design is compatible with the architecture and all supporting systems. We ensure that the lighting and lighting control costs are clearly defined and work to create the most stunning designs while staying within the agreed-upon budget. Our close industry relationships with reputable vendors who are committed to cost transparency translate into high-quality design with zero surprises for our clients. What we ultimately install in the space is exactly what the client expects. FIRM CONTACT Name: Elise Streeb Principal / Partner, IALD, LEED AP Address: 525 Basalt Ave, Unit I-300, Basalt, CO 81621 Phone: 303.573.0059 Email: elise@ls.lighting Website: www.ls.lighting Hotel Jerome - Aspen SCOPE Lighting Design 20 weeks 7 public 14 weeks 4 weeks 16 weeks hearings Commence Conclude Name Title Hourly Rate Hours Fee $'s Part 1a and 1bb Hours/ Week Fee $'s/Wee k John D Feinberg APTI, Principal $250 24 $6,000 12 $3,000 8 $2,000 Total TCI Fee $'s Part 1a and Part 1b $11,000 $14,000 $14,000 December 2024December 2024September 2024December 2024 September 2024December 2024June 2024 the Collaborative inc. (TCI) time per staff person per week not provided for this phase of work - see proposed fee below time per staff person per week not provided for this phase of work - see proposed fee below time per staff person per week not provided for this phase of work - see proposed fee below Existing Bldg Conditions Evaluations, Masonry Conditions Evaluations, Design Cosultant - Historic Asset Rehabilitation Part 3 Approval Recordation Part 5 Construction DocumentDesign Development Part 4 May 2024 June 2024January 2024 Enhanced Schematic Part 1a and 1b Land Use Application Design and Review Part 2 Existing buildings have condition issues that must be addressed before they can be reused. Furthermore, such buildings present highly beneficial opportunities for enhancing their reuse. For nearly 50 years we have provided clients with a comprehensive range of historic preservation architecture, site planning, conservation, and technical preservation services. Since 1974, The Collaborative (TCI) has evolved into a recognized international firm with extensive expertise that goes beyond simple condition issues. Our strengths are backed up by technical equipment and laboratory findings. We have deep experience in reuse aspects, such as accessibility compliance, fire codes, life-safety codes, energy codes, and associated building codes, including the development of appropriate creative solutions for these issues. We have the technological capabilities and the know-how to search for all condition problems including complicated ones, confirm their existence, and develop appropriate creative responses to each. TCI has met this challenge successfully on over 2,000 buildings in virtually every state and U.S. Territory and extending into the Caribbean. What Makes Us Different? We find and treat the real problems. • Our depth of experience and knowledge - reduce risks by discovering hidden causes of the deteriora- tion problems, defining the often multiple and interconnected causes, and determining cost effective, appropriate, and long-lasting solutions. • Our technical expertise - In-field testing equipment (including non-destructive), and historic materials laboratory serve to define and quantify the real problems. • We provide accurate and critical information to make informed decisions. Because we provide such a broad range of services, we craft each service to integrate with the next in the typical chronology of a project. Preservation Services: Existing Buildings Documentation, Preservation Architecture, Conditions Evaluations (BER, HSR, Etc.), Feasibility Analysis, Historic Materials Analysis, Laboratory Analysis of Historic Materials FIRM CONTACT Name: John Feinberg Address: 2080 Pearl Street, Boulder, CO 80302 Phone: (303)442-3601 Email: john@thecollaborativeinc.net Website: www.thecollaborativeinc.net Fetz-Keller Ranch, Historic Structure Report, Comprehensive Historic Preservation Plans and Specs, Nat’l Register Nomination, Montrose, CO SCOPE Historic Rehabilitation Plaza-Ilfeld Hotel, Historic Structure Report, Comprehensive Historic Preservation Plans and Specs, Las Vegas, NM 5.1.E PROPOSED CONSULTANTS | ENGINEERS 20 weeks 7 public 14 weeks 4 weeks 16 weeks hearings Commence Conclude Name Title Hourly Rate TBD Code Consultant tbd Total Fees $'s Per Phase To Be Selected Code Consulting _ To provide preliinary code study at SD, Final Code Study at DD. Updated code study at CD. Advise on existing building code, ADA, and energy code. Enhanced Schematic Land Use Application Design Development Approval Recordation Part 1a and 1b Part 2 Part 3 Part 4 December 2024 September 2024 Construction Document Design and Review time per staff person per week not provided for this phase of work - see time per staff person per week not provided for this phase of work - see Part 5 January 2024 June 2024 June 2024 $4,000 $0 $3,000 May 2024 December 2024 September 2024 December 2024 December 2024 time per staff person per week not provided for this phase of work - see time per staff person per week not provided for this phase of work - see time per staff person per week not provided for this phase of work - see $2,000 $0 20 weeks 7 public 14 weeks 4 weeks 16 weeks hearings Commence Conclude Name Title Hourly Rate TBD Waterproofing Consultant tbd Total Fees $'s Per Phase To Be Selected Waterproofing _ Review typical assemblies in DD. Review and comment on 100% DD drawings and 50% CD drawings. Advise on waterprorfing and envelope details questions arise Enhanced Schematic Land Use Application Design Development Approval Recordation Part 1a and 1b Part 2 Part 3 Part 4 December 2024 September 2024 Construction Document Design and Review time per staff person per week not provided for this phase of work - see time per staff person per week not provided for this phase of work - see Part 5 January 2024 June 2024 June 2024 $8,000 May 2024 December 2024 September 2024 December 2024 December 2024 time per staff person per week not provided for this phase of work - see time per staff person per week not provided for this phase of work - see time per staff person per week not provided for this phase of work - see $0 $0 $6,000 $0 20 weeks 7 public 14 weeks 4 weeks 16 weeks hearings Commence Conclude Name Title Hourly Rate TBD Spec Writer tbd Total Fees $'s Per Phase $0 $0 $3,000 $0 $5,000 May 2024 December 2024 September 2024 December 2024 December 2024 time per staff person per week not provided for this phase of work - see time per staff person per week not provided for this phase of work - see time per staff person per week not provided for this phase of work - see time per staff person per week not provided for this phase of work - see time per staff person per week not provided for this phase of work - see Part 5 January 2024 June 2024 June 2024 December 2024 September 2024 Construction Document Design and Review To Be Selected Specification _ Write a specification at 100% DD, 90% CD, and update 90% CD spec for 100% CD Enhanced Schematic Land Use Application Design Development Approval Recordation Part 1a and 1b Part 2 Part 3 Part 4 Aspen Art Museum WHAT WE PROPOSE5.2 PROPOSAL ELEMENTS 5.2 PROPOSAL ELEMENTS 5.2.A. ACKNOWLEDGEMENT OF SCOPE OF SERVICES The 131 year old historically designated Armory Hall has undergone mul- tiple renovations and retrofits over the past 50 years, including the filling- in of a mezzanine level in the 1970s and the addition of a basement in the 1990s. The current 19,000 sq. ft. building now consists of a basement and three stories. The City of Aspen’s vision for the Armory Hall remodel/reuse speaks to a sustainable and energy efficient mixed-use building which will be a vibrant community hub for a diverse range of people. The final design will maintain flexibility for changes in programming to meet shifting community needs for the next 50 years. The final design will incorporate sustainable and energy efficient building systems and technology, showing a commitment to the environment. In addition, all accessibility and current City of Aspen building code requirements will be met. For the purposes of this proposal, we are assuming the following details about the building’s program and the scope of the project: The primary use of the adaptive re-use of the Armory is a community gathering space anchored by a food hall. It will be operated by a single entity with two distinct food concepts that include a distributed “point of sale” kitchen, each requiring their own lines and ventilation. It will also include two additional concepts that will not require ventilation, for a total of 4 food concepts. A large prep kitchen, ware wash, and receiving area will serve all food outlets. A front of house communal bar will serve the entire facility. Two small retail spaces will be provided. There will also be a “private dining room” that can double as a community meeting space or be leased out for small private events. A large public bathroom facility will serve the food hall and general public special events such as Winterskol, Food and Wine, and the Saturday Farmer’s Markets. The exterior of the building will require full rehabilitation including point- ing the masonry and replacement of the windows. The interior will require a full gut down to the structural frame and the complete replacement of MEP systems. Vertical circulation will be re-designed including stair- ways, service elevator, and public elevator. The historic mezzanine will be re-established at the second level, reducing the overall building area to approximately 14,000 sq. ft. No new addition to the existing building footprint is anticipated within the fees proposed. We anticipate the verti- cal construction costs for the project to be between $1,000 and $1,200 per square foot. Interior fixed finishes, tenant improvements, and FF&E are not included in the current scope of work. The adjacent park will serve as an amenity to the Armory and the design should address a relationship to the park. Any re-design of the park is excluded as it is the purview of the City of Aspen Parks Department. Coordination of the Parks Department’s design may be necessary. Phase 1a, Enhanced Schematic Design, and Phase 1b, Operational Study, are intended to create further clarity for the building’s program and the scope of work required to meet the program requirements. The assump- tions above are intended to create a framework for CCY and the broader design team to provide fees through Phase 5 of the project. If the pro- gram evolves in Phase 1 from our base assumptions (depending on the magnitude of the changes) fees proposed for subsequent phases may be adjusted. Schedule • Part 1a. Enhanced Schematic Design: January – May 2024 (20 weeks) • Part 1b. Operations Study: January – May 2024 (20 weeks) o (2) public City Council work sessions o (1) public engagement event • Part 2. Land Use Process: June 2024 – December 2024 o (3) public City Council meetings o (4) public Historic Preservation Commission meetings • Part 3. Design Development: June 2024 – September 2024 (14 weeks) o (1) public City Council work session • Part 4. Recordation of Approval documents: December 2024 (4 weeks) • Part 5. Construction Documents: September 2024 – December 2024 (16 weeks) Process Part 1a and 1b Enhanced Schematic Design & Operational Study We start every project in earnest with a design charrette. An intensive 3-day work session that gathers the key consultants, members of the City of Aspen’s team and other key stakeholders to collaborate and provide the design team with constructive feedback in real time. With the proper prepa- ration, we are very facile at establishing a vision for the project and testing potential concepts and solutions in an open, highly interactive format. We find that we get more done in a few days than several weeks of a more traditional process. To ensure that we get the most out of the charrette a few key steps need to be completed prior. Information Gathering / Analysis To initiate the project, we will start by getting a thorough download of exist- ing information including surveys, geotechnical studies, previous city approv- als and covenants, and any other information the city can make available that may affect the project. Design Workshop will perform a land use report that summarizes the constraints the land use code places on this parcel. We will 5.2 PROPOSAL ELEMENTS work with the client team to develop a preliminary building program. We will begin to search for precedents of similar projects with our consultant team to explore design character and operational approaches that may make sense for the broader team to consider. We will help the City fa- cilitate a contract with a third party for as built drawings to be created for Armory Hall if they do not already exist. We will also spend time working with Design Workshop to conduct a site analysis, that considers access to parking, walkability, solar access, and relationships with neighboring properties. KL&A will update their existing structural analysis as necessary and summarize their previous and any new findings regarding the struc- tural condition of the building. The Collaborative Inc will perform a historic building assessment. The goal of this phase is to learn as much as possible about the challenges and the opportunities that will face the project prior to putting pencil to paper. Programming/Sustainability Goal Setting/Operations Work Session Prior to the design charrette we propose a series of two, one day work sessions with key consultants and members of the City’s team to refine the program and operational model, as well as to set sustainability goals for the project. Various consultants including Immersed, Group 14, Ricca, Frontier Energy, and REG will participate in the work sessions. We under- stand the Design Workshop’s Strategic Services Team has performed a feasibility study for Armory Hall. If the city is interested in Design Work- shop’s Strategic Services Team’s participation in the work sessions DW can provide this service as an additional service. For the programming and operational portion of the work session CCY will lead the discussion with Immersed and Ricca Design Studio. We will evaluate the preliminary building program and the number and types of food and retail concepts that the Armory can accommodate and how that informs seating capac- ity and arrangement. We’ll discuss the various operational models that could exist and how those various models may inform the front and back of house. Additionally we’ll explore how the building needs to be serviced. The sustainability portion of the work sessions will be facilitated by Group 14, the team’s sustainability consultant. The goal will be to establish and commit to achievable goals around energy use, water use, carbon intensity and tracking, and any “big moves” related to the sustainable aspects of the project. Most importantly, we’ll work with the consultants to establish a series of strategies for how to attain these goals. Establishing these priori- ties early and creating a road map for success is important for the design team and the client team to make timely decisions around these topics throughout the design process. Charrette For the Armory Hall charrette, we expect a 3-day charrette with the City of Aspen team, three or four key members of the CCY team, and a repre- sentative from the key consultants on the project. The CCY team works to advance design and then checks in with the stake holders and consultants once, sometimes twice, a day to share progress and receive feedback, allowing us to advance the design options in real time while gaining buy-in from all parties. During the charrette, we will address the overall vision and guiding principles for the project as well as develop the pro- gramming, architectural character, and space planning. We will utilize both freehand sketch techniques and computer generated 3-D modeling to illustrate and evaluate a variety of design options and concepts. By the end of the charrette, we will have established two general concepts, that will be a distillation of many more ideas. Complete Enhanced Schematic Design and Operational Study We will refine the initial concepts developed during the charrette in preparation for a public engagement event and the first of two City Coun- cil Work Sessions. After these two events, it is our understanding that City Council will provide clear direction on which concept CCY and the design team will pursue through the completion of Enhanced Schematic Design. By the conclusion of Enhanced Schematic Design, we will have an estab- lished floor plan, building area, building sections, and exterior elevations. The general operational concept and program will be refined from our earlier work sessions and agreed upon by all parties prior to moving into later phases of work. We will engage with MEP, Structural, Civil, Lighting, Kitchen, and Historic Preservation consultants to ensure the Schematic Design can accommodate the future needs of these various scopes as we move to the later phases of work. Each of these consultants will establish initial systems/scope narratives that incorporate previously established goals around Sustainability, Energy Use, and Brand and Food Concepts. Consultants with drawings required for the upcoming land use applica- tion will provide the drawings required of the required submission. At the conclusion of this phase, preliminary estimates by a yet to be selected General Contractor will be used to establish an initial construction budget. Simultaneously to the completion of Enhanced Schematic Design, Ricca Design Studios and Immersed will be working to develop the required operational study that evaluates the operating costs associated with run- ning the facility. It will provide recommendations on an operating model and provide feedback on the other models considered. The report should provide recommendations on how a future operator could provide afford- able product, including the need for subsidy and how to measure afford- ability over time. The report should be presented in a way that allows the City Council to confirm the recommendations but consider the alternatives that were considered. The report should include case studies that dem- onstrate each of the models considered. A draft of the operations study will be complete for the first City Council meeting in phase 1. Based on feedback from the council the report will be updated, and a final report issued shortly thereafter. After the study is complete these consultants will continue to participate in two to three additional design meetings through phase 1 to inform the design team of the needs of a future operator. Part 2 _ Land Use Process This phase of work is focused on the time required to support the land use review process. Design Workshop will be leading the land use appli- cation and review process with direct support form CCY and other consul- tants on the team as necessary. We have assumed 3 public meetings with City council and 4 with the Historic Preservation Commission. The work and time dedicated to this phase is focused on the administrative work of 5.2 PROPOSAL ELEMENTS completing and updating the applications, preparing pre- sentations for public meetings, attending those meetings, and summarizing and responding to the feedback received during the meetings. Given that the schedule of the land use process is concurrent with Phase 3, Design Develop- ment, CCY and our consultants have assumed the time necessary to develop additional information and exhibits for the land use application is accounted for in Phase 1 or phase 3. Part 3 _ Design Development In Design Development we begin to coordinate consul- tant information and building systems while continuing to develop the overall design at a larger, more detailed level. We assume by the beginning of this phase of work the City will have brought on an operator so that decisions affecting the operational plan can begin to be confirmed or edited as necessary early in this phase of work. This step allows Immersed and Ricca’s scopes of work for operational consulting to conclude with the issuance of the operations study and Enhanced Schematic Design in Phase 1. The DD scope of work that CCY and all other consultants complete will be based on the AIA DD Scope of Work per Article 3 of the AIA contract template the city provided with the RFP. Throughout the DD phase there will be weekly design team meetings. We propose that the City of Aspen team partici- pates in every other meeting, rather than every one. This will give the design team an opportunity to work through coordination issues one week and review progress with the City the following week while preserving enough time each week to make good progress on advancing the project. A coordination set will be issued at 50% DD. At or near this milestone we anticipate another work session with Aspen City Council to seek their approval of the progress made. It’s assumed their feedback will be relevant to the phase of work we are in and will represent a refinement of the direction provided at the conclusion of phase 1. In DD our 3-D model continues to get more refined and developed. This will allow us to “tour” the City team through the project in VR to get a sense of the spaces and materials. At the conclusion of Design Development, you will be able to understand the majority of design decisions and the General Contractor can provide a more detailed construction cost estimate. Part 4 _ Approval Documents Recordation Support This phase of work will include the time required to update original PUD documents to reflect any changes made through the City Council approvals process. It also includes the administrative time to coordinate and submit these documents. Design Workshop, the team’s land use planner will administer the submission of the required approval documents. Part 5 _ Construction Documents During Construction Documents drawings and specifica- tions are coordinated and finalized for building permit submission and construction. We provide a comprehensive set of documents and specifications. Prior to the issuance of 100% CD’s the design team will issue progress/coordina- tion deliverables at 50% and 90% complete. Throughout the CD phase there will be bi-weekly design team meet- ings. We propose that the City of Aspen team participates in every other meeting. This cadence will give the design team an opportunity to work through coordination issues one week and review progress and issues with the City as they arise while preserving enough time make good prog- ress on advancing the documents. The CD scope of work that CCY and all other consultants complete will be based on the AIA CD Scope of Work per Article 3 of the AIA contract template the city provided with the RFP. If selected CCY Architects intends to perform the archi- tectural services for The City of Aspen’s Armory Hall. We have reviewed and understand all elements of the RFP and we are willing to enter into a contract under the terms and conditions prescribed by the owner herein. We take no exception to the requirements as described in the RFP with one exception. 1.During the mandatory pre-bid call the City stated that an addition to the building was unlikely. Given this response we have not provided an add alternate for phases 1-5. Enhanced Schematic Design will explore the need for this additional space and the fees proposed for Phase 1 include the possibility of an addition being explored. If City Council selects a design direction which includes an addition, fees will be reviewed and adjusted as necessary at that time. Sawmill Market in Albuquerque, NM Part 1a and 1b Part 2 Part 3 Part 4 Part 5 Enhanced Schematic Design & Operations Study Land Use Application and Review Design Development Aproval Documents and Recording Construction Documents 20 weeks 7 weeks - non consecutive 14 weeks 4 weeks 16 weeks Start Jan 2024 June 2024 June 2024 December 2024 September 2024 Conclude May 2024 December 2024 September 2024 December 2024 December 2024 CCY Architects Partner in Charge Project Manager Project Architect Job Captain Architect / Designer Partner Architecture $325 $210 $210 $165 $145 $325 Design Workshop Principal Planner CE Principal LA Histroic Preservation Project Manager Planner - CE Land Use Planning, Land Use Planning, & LA $275 $275 $200 $175 $110 KL&A Inc Executive Principal Principal in Charge Project Manager Project Engineer Design Engineer Structural Engineering $250 $210 $170 $150 $125 Resource Engineering Group Principal Engineer Senior Project Engineer Project Engineer Engineering Drafter MEP Engineering $250 $190 $165 $130 BG Buildingworks Partner in Charge Tech Designer BIM Manager Associate Technoloogy & Fire and Life Safety $257 $232 $140 $140 The Collaborative Inc APTI, Principal Historic Preservaton Consulting $250 LS Group Principal / Partner Principal / Partner Commercial Projects Dir Lead Designer Designer Designer Lighting Design $275 $275 $225 $195 $150 $150 Group 14 Team Leader Sr. Eng III Engineer II Sustainability $212 $144 Ricca Design Studio Principal Director Project Manager Operational Consulting, Kitchen Consulting $300 $200 $170 Immersed SVP of Operations Development/Operational Consulting $600 Frontier Energy Sr Program Manager Program Manager Administration Engineer Engineer Food Service Operation Facility Design Support $214 $178 $80 $168 $168 Roaring Fork Engineering Principal Senior Project Manager Project Manager Civil Engineering $240 $213 $159 Code Consultant Code Consultant to be selected TBD Waterproofing Consultant Waterproofing Consultant to be selected TBD Specifiaction Consulting Spec Writer to be selected TBD NOTES:Hours per week per phase for part 1 and part 2 for each of our consultants can be found in our consultant summaries Per question asked at the second prebid meeting we have created our own spreadsheet that formats the fee calculations differently than the template provided. This was said to be acceptable Per question asked at the second prebid meeting we have only provided hours per staff person per phase for parts 1 and 2 and provided lump sums for the remaining phases. This was said to be acceptable Reimburable expenses include travel expenses, shipping delivery charges, reproduction /printing, Mark Up on reimbursable expensesand consultants invoiced directly through CCY will be 10% Travel time will be billed as an additional service Fees are based on the proposed schedule reflected in the RFP. Fees assume the durations of each part not increasingnor are there breaks in the work that the schedule does not state. Hourly rates are subject to change based on each consultant's annual raise and promotion policies. The anticipated number of hours are fixed. Interior Design Services not included based on responses to questions from pre-bib meeting that the current scope is for white box/ core and shell. Fees proposed assume no addition to the building and no add alternate for an addition is included in our proposal per question and answer session at the pre-bid meeting Construction Cost Estimating not included per question and answer session at the pre bid meeting. Project team assumes City will contract with this conultant and/or bring on a GC in durning the Enhanced Schematic Design Phase. Team Member 1 Hourly Rates $13,900 $3,000.00 $8,97510.00% Team Member 6Team Member 5Team Member 4Team Member 3Team Member 2 $0 $29,920 $7,728 $19,800 $14,000 $115,080 $40,500 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0$33,750 $122,706 $14,825 $14,000 $15,000 $7,152 $34,900 $0 $80,784$144,840 $30,000 $24,930 $14,240 $6,375 $171,864 $0 $0 $8,260 $26,604.7515.00%$177,365$0$22,780$21,985 $122,430$383,440 $11,000 $4,462 $63,000 $33,750 $0 $17,600 $0 $0 $29,120 $72,000$60,600 $36,911.103.00%$1,230,370$363,000$46,000$315,500 $0.00 $5,850.0015.00%$39,000 10.00% $397,488 $30,000 $89,750 Total Fee $2,563,233$619,928$68,780$696,198$392,154 $3,000$0$0 $108,000 2.00%$2,160 $1,6595.00%$33,187 $5,000 $9,000 $786,173 $0 $0 $6,000 $0 $8,000 $4,000$0$2,000 $8,000$5,000$0 $14,000 Reimbursable Expenses Total Fee Estimated reimbursable expenses Estimated reimbursable expenses as a percentage of fee $3,000$0 $318,386 $49,435 0.00% $7,536 $0 $22,596 $30,132 5.2.B FEE WORKSHEET 5.2.C DETAILED SCHEDULE Part 1A and 1B • Week 1: Start work - Information gathering by CCY, and Design Workshop, existing structure analysis by KL&A • Week 3: Programing/Operational/Sustainability work session with design team and consultants • Week 4: Programing/Operational/Sustainability works session #2 (if deemed necessary). Final Charrette preparation, including base graphics for design work • Week 5: Charrette – Design kickoff including design team and City/client group representatives • Week 8: Issue draft Operations Study • Week 10: Begin public outreach and first City Council work session • Week 12: Public engagement event • Week 15: Issue final Operations Study • Week 16: Second City Council Work session • Week 20: General Contractor and Operator selected by City/client group • Week 20: Issue Enhanced Schematic Design package. Submit Land Use Application. Part 2 Schedule to be refined in conjunction with City of Aspen Staff in order to develop an ap- proach that appropriately accommodates other demands placed on City Council. Meet- ings and associated work will be performed concurrently with Part 3 and Part 5. Part 3 • Week 1: Design Development kick off meeting, including design team and engi- neering consultants • Week 1: General Contractor starts Schematic Design pricing • Week 2: Land Use Application deemed complete • Week 4: General Contractor issues SD pricing estimate • Week 7: Issue 50% Design Development coordination set • Week 8: Aspen City council progress work session. • Week 14: Issue 100% Design Development drawings Note: schedule does not indicate anticipated weekly coordination meetings with consultant group, and biweekly check-ins with City of Aspen team. Part 4 Work will begin once land use approvals are complete and will be completed concurrently with the work performed in Part 5. Part 5 • Week 1: Construction Documents kick off meeting, including design team and engineering consultants • Week 1: General Contractor starts Design Development pricing • Week 6: General Contractor issues DD pricing estimate • Week 7: Issue 50% Construction Documents coordination set • Week 14: Issue 90% CD (final) coordination set • Week 16: Issue 100% CD drawings Note: schedule does not indicate anticipated weekly coordination meetings with consultant group, and biweekly check-ins with City of Aspen team. 5.2.D Design Process Coordination and Quality Control Throughout the progression of design and documentation, we will hold weekly coordina- tion meetings with the design team to promote a linear design process. Drawings will be issued at indicated “milestones” for in depth review and coordination. In addition, the City of Aspen team will be engaged in biweekly check-in meetings for design feedback and input on program evolution. 5.2.C DETAILED SCHEDULE 5.2.D DESIGN PROCESS COORDINATION AND QUALITY CONTROL REFERENCES AND CONTACT GARRETT SIMON – Partner | Meriwether Companies Email: gsimon@meriwetherco.com Office: 970.596.6642 Projects: Telluride Transfer, Griffan Club, DAVID CORBIN – Former Senior Vice-President, Planning & Development | Aspen Skiing Company Email: dgcorbin1@gmail.com Projects: Elk Camp Restaurant CHRISTINA CALABRESE – President | Lone Mountain Land Company Email: ccalabrese@lonemountainland.com Office: 406.219.0825 Projects: Moonlight Basin Ulery’s Lake - Lodge BOZ BOSWELL, AIA – VP of Architecture, Design, and Planning | Yellowstone Club Email: boz.boswell@yellowstoneclub.com Mobile: 406.579.1180 Project: Eglise Lodge GERRY ENGLE – Partner | GE Holdings Email: gengle@geholdingsllc.com Mobile: 970.376.0349 Projects: Telluride Transfer, Plumpjack Squaw Valley Inn, Griffin Club, Moonlight Basin Reposition AMY SIMON – Planning Director City of Aspen Email: amy.simon@cityofaspen.com Office: 970.429.2758 MICHELLE HAYNES – Planning & Development Services Director – Town of Mountain Village, CO Former Director of Community Development – Town of Telluride, CO Email: mhaynes@mntnvillage.com Cell: 970.417.6976 Office: 970.239.4061 ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- CCY REPRESENTATIVES + CONTACT Todd Kennedy, AIA - Partner | tkennedy@ccyarchitects.com Rich Carr, AIA - Partner | rcarr@ccyarchitects.com APPENDIX PROPOSAL/AGREEMENT 5613 DTC Pkwy, Suite 100, Greenwood Village, CO 80111 | p. 303.221.0500 | f. 303.221.0600 | www.ricca.com 1 TTHHIISS PPRROOPPOOSSAALL//AAGGRREEEEMMEENNTT mmaaddee aass ooff RREEVV IISSEEDD:: DDeecceemmbbeerr 1155,, 2200 2233 Date: December 13, 2023 Between: CCCCYY AARRCCHHIITTEECCTTSS 228 Midland Ave P.O. Box 529 Basalt, CO 81621 Contact: Todd Kennedy, AIA Phone: 970.927.4925 Email: tkennedy@ccyarchitects.com (hereinafter referred to as “Client”) And: RRIICCCCAA DDEESSIIGGNN SSTTUUDDIIOOSS 5613 DTC Parkway, Suite 100 Greenwood Village, CO 80111 Contact: Jeremy Kittelson Title: Principal Phone: 303. 495.9925 Email: jkittelson@ricca.com or Contact: Laura Mueller Title: Marketing Manager Phone: 303.221.0500 Fax: 303.221.0600 Email: lmueller@ricca.com (hereinafter referred to as “Consultant” or “Ricca”) FFoorr tthhee ffoollllooww iinngg PPrroojjeecctt :: RRIICCCCAA PPRROOJJEECCTT ## 2233444400..FF0000 AASSPPEENN AARRMMOORRYY RREEMMOODDEELL Culinary Design Aspen, CO RICCA DESIGN STUDIOS PROPOSAL TO: CCY ARCHITECTS RE: ASPEN ARMORY HALL REMODEL DATE: 12.15.23 CULINARY DESIGN 5613 DTC Pkwy, Suite 100, Greenwood Village, CO 80111 | p. 303.221.0500 | f. 303.221.0600 | www.ricca.com 2 CULINARY DESIGN - SCOPE OF WORK Ricca Design Studios (Ricca) proposes to provide culinary design services for the Aspen Armory Hall Remodel project located in Aspen, CO. Based on the RFP dated 10/2023, the Conditions Assessment dated 7.19.23, the Market Study dated 11.3.23and additional information received to date, Ricca understands the scope of work to include full-service (Enhanced Schematic Design – CD) for the remodel and redevelopment of a mixed-use project within Armory Hall. Based on the recommendations from the Market Study, Ricca’s scope will include the following: - A full-service casual dining concept - 1-2 quick service concepts - Bar - Main kitchen/storage Please note, Ricca reserves the right to revisit our proposed scope & fee upon completion of Program Confirmation and will adjust for any potential changes to the scope. 1.0 CULINARY DESIGN - SCOPE OF SERVICES Ricca Design Studios will provide the following professional culinary design Scope of Services: 1.1 ENHANCED SCHEMATIC DESIGN PHASE Upon completion of Program Confirmation, Ricca will prepare a schematic plan in digital form providing the location and identification of foodservice elements and equipment while showing critical adjacencies all in preliminary form indicating the flow of personnel and goods. Plans will then be amended as necessary to obtain final approval of the Client and design team. 1.1.1 Program Confirmation Ricca will participate in an initial meeting with the design team and key stakeholders to review the planning work completed to date and confirm participation, mix of venues, services, and dining capacity requirements for the foodservice operations to be included in this project. Upon confirmation of program assumptions, Ricca will develop a detailed foodservice space program, which can include 2-3 options for further review. The selected option will form the basis of design narrative. 1.1.2 Basis of Design Narrative The basis of design narrative will include findings and recommendations for review by the Client. Upon review and approval, the narrative will be adjusted accordingly and will become the basis of design for the project. 1.1.3 Concept Design Upon completion of Program Development and Basis of Design, Ricca will prepare a concept plan providing the location and identification of foodservice elements and critical adjacencies in preliminary form; indicating the flow of personnel and goods. Plans will be amended as necessary to obtain approval of the Client and design team. RICCA DESIGN STUDIOS PROPOSAL TO: CCY ARCHITECTS RE: ASPEN ARMORY HALL REMODEL DATE: 12.15.23 CULINARY DESIGN 5613 DTC Pkwy, Suite 100, Greenwood Village, CO 80111 | p. 303.221.0500 | f. 303.221.0600 | www.ricca.com 3 1.1.4 Foodservice Guidelines for Architects and Engineers Ricca will submit Foodservice Guidelines for Architects and Engineers for the design team’s use in coordinating with foodservice equipment needs and for developing supporting building systems. These Guidelines are based on typical design considerations and best practices within the foodservice industry. 1.1.5 Preliminary Equipment Cost Estimate Ricca will prepare and submit for approval, an order-of-magnitude foodservice equipment cost estimate. This will be based on the project’s space program, schematic plan(s), industry-standard space allocation pricing, current pricing conditions, and our professional experience. 1.1.6 Preliminary Utility Loads Based on the approved schematic design plan, Ricca will prepare bulk MEP utility loads by area for use by the design team’s engineers in developing applicable major system utility requirements. 1.1.7 Schematic Design Submittal Ricca will submit final schematic design documents - as noted above - to the Client for final approval before proceeding to the next phase. 1.2 DESIGN DEVELOPMENT PHASE Upon written approval of the issued schematic design documents, Ricca will proceed with design development phase design, coordination, and documentation that includes the following: 1.2.1 Operator/End-User Equipment Selection and Review Charrette Upon request, Ricca will conduct a design charrette for a detailed examination of plans, sketches, and manufacturer brochures required to obtain final comments and adjustments by the design team. 1.2.2 Foodservice Equipment Plans Ricca will generate scaled 1/8” (1:100) or 1/4" (1:50) equipment plans that provide the location and identification of all equipment and component systems. These plans will include adequate detail for recognition of equipment, as well as a coordinated schedule that will contain equipment item numbers, quantities, and descriptions. These progress drawings will be prepared in digital form and will show sufficient detail for review and approval by the Client, design team and governing agencies. 1.2.3 Equipment Manufacturer Data Book Ricca will draft a foodservice equipment data book for review and final approval by the Client. Data sheets will be marked to include identification of manufacturer, model number, utility requirements and selected options/accessories. The approved data sheets will become the basis for next-phase written equipment specifications. 1.2.4 Equipment Estimates of Probable Costs Ricca will provide an itemized estimate of probable costs for foodservice equipment reflecting the finalized design development equipment plans for approval by the Client. RICCA DESIGN STUDIOS PROPOSAL TO: CCY ARCHITECTS RE: ASPEN ARMORY HALL REMODEL DATE: 12.15.23 CULINARY DESIGN 5613 DTC Pkwy, Suite 100, Greenwood Village, CO 80111 | p. 303.221.0500 | f. 303.221.0600 | www.ricca.com 4 1.2.5 Itemized Utility Loads Ricca will develop itemized MEP utility loads/values reflecting the finalized design development equipment plans. These loads will be keyed to the equipment list, floor plans, and foodservice equipment brochures defining utility requirements for each piece of foodservice equipment. 1.2.6 Exhaust Hood Requirements Ricca will provide preliminary exhaust hood locations, sizing and specifications to the project architects and engineers. Documents related to exhaust hoods are limited to 1) exhaust and supply duct connection sizes; 2) CFM requirements; and 3) static pressure. It is the responsibility of the assigned project engineers to design and document all building mechanical systems, including sequencing, and supporting the exhaust hoods in a balanced and fully functional manner. 1.2.7 Supplemental Drawings Ricca will provide preliminary supplemental drawings that detail engineered foodservice equipment systems such as a walk-in refrigeration box, and a refrigeration rack system (where appropriate) when specified as a part of the foodservice equipment package. 1.2.8 Design Development Submittal Ricca will submit final design development documents -- as noted above -- to the Client for final approval before proceeding to the next phase. 1.3 CONSTRUCTION DOCUMENTS PHASE Upon written approval of issued design development documents, Ricca will coordinate and prepare construction documentation for solicitation of valid foodservice equipment bids as follows: 1.3.1 Final 1/4" (1:50) Scale Equipment Plans Ricca will generate final 1/4" (1:50) scale equipment plans (based on dimensioned architectural, interior design and engineering plans provided to Ricca as background for work within its scope) identifying equipment and component systems approved for use on this project. These plans will include adequate detail for recognition of equipment, as well as a schedule that will include the item number, quantity, and a brief description. 1.3.2 Building Conditions Plans Ricca will provide building conditions plans that identify building requirements to accommodate foodservice equipment, such as slab depressions, critical clearances, conduit, or sleeve locations, raised pads, unique load-bearing requirements, floor troughs and floor penetrations. 1.3.3 Plumbing/Electrical Connection Plans Ricca will provide plumbing and electrical connection plans that identify size and connection points for water, gas, steam, drains, electrical and other utilities required for the foodservice equipment within our scope of work. RICCA DESIGN STUDIOS PROPOSAL TO: CCY ARCHITECTS RE: ASPEN ARMORY HALL REMODEL DATE: 12.15.23 CULINARY DESIGN 5613 DTC Pkwy, Suite 100, Greenwood Village, CO 80111 | p. 303.221.0500 | f. 303.221.0600 | www.ricca.com 5 1.3.4 Exhaust Hood Requirements Ricca will provide finalized exhaust hood locations, sizing and specifications to the project architects and engineers. Documents related to exhaust hoods are limited to 1) exhaust and supply duct connection sizes; 2) CFM requirements; and 3) static pressure. It is the responsibility of the assigned project engineers to design and document all building mechanical systems, including sequencing, and supporting the exhaust hoods in a balanced and fully functional manner. 1.3.5 Specifications for Bid Ricca will write specifications for bid covering all equipment to be installed within Consultant's scope of work to be included in the overall project bid set. These documents will include foodservice general conditions and comprehensive itemized descriptions for all equipment. NOTE: Ricca’s specifications are written in typical CIS standard format with general conditions referencing current codes and industry standard processes. 1.3.6 Foodservice Equipment Elevations/Sections Ricca will provide foodservice equipment elevations/sections at 1/2” (1:25) = 1’-0” (1:1) scale as required for Client review of all major areas. These elevations will include both manufactured and custom fabricated equipment items - excluding front-of-house decorative finishes/millwork - that is typically detailed by the assigned interior design professional. 1.3.7 Standard Fabrication Details Ricca will generate standard fabrication details for use by the awarded Kitchen Equipment Contractor (KEC) for bidding and development of shop drawing submittals. These details are prepared for design- intent only and are not for use by the fabricator as shop and/or construction details. 1.3.8 Service Counter Detail Documentation Based on detailed sketches, design direction and finish selection by the Architect or its assigned interior designer, Consultant will provide the following: 1.3.8.1 Service Counter Fabrication Details Ricca will generate detailed plan drawings, sections, and elevations in digital form for reference-use in the construction of counters, cabinet work and other millwork details for the serving areas. These drawings are not intended to be used by the fabricator as shop drawings, but to convey design intent and coordination needs in relation to the foodservice equipment only. These drawings shall include coordinated references to interior-designer assigned finish materials, however millwork specifications and schedule of finishes shall be provided by the Architect or its interior designer. 1.3.9 Supplemental Drawings Ricca will provide finalized supplemental drawings that detail engineered foodservice equipment systems such as walk-in refrigeration box and a refrigeration rack system (where appropriate) when specified as a part of the foodservice equipment. RICCA DESIGN STUDIOS PROPOSAL TO: CCY ARCHITECTS RE: ASPEN ARMORY HALL REMODEL DATE: 12.15.23 CULINARY DESIGN 5613 DTC Pkwy, Suite 100, Greenwood Village, CO 80111 | p. 303.221.0500 | f. 303.221.0600 | www.ricca.com 6 1.3.10 Equipment Estimates of Probable Costs Ricca will prepare an itemized estimate of probable costs for foodservice equipment reflecting the finalized construction document equipment plans for approval by the Client. 1.3.11 Regulatory Agency Reviews Ricca will assist its Client and A/E team in their responsibility for preparing documents required for approval by health department/hygiene authorities having jurisdiction over the project. Such assistance will include copies of construction documents and clarification of any questions regarding equipment within its scope of work. As a result of the Client’s submittal, any modifications to the foodservice equipment plans required by such authorities will be provided at no additional fee provided this submittal occurs prior to the assignment of contract to KEC. 1.3.12 Addenda Ricca will prepare and issue required addenda during contractor bidding that can include, but may not be limited to, supplementary drawings and/or specifications. 1.3.13 Bid Assistance and Review Upon request, Ricca will submit a list of foodservice contractors/bidders for Client’s use in bid issuance. Upon receipt of bids, Ricca will assist the Client in a line-item review of all foodservice equipment bids. Ricca will also review and respond to alternates submitted during bidding. 1.3.14 Post-Bid Services After construction documents are completed and approved, any coordination with bidding subcontractors is included in Basic Services. However, any post-bid document revisions resulting from equipment substitutions would be the responsibility of the KEC. 2.0 BIM LEVEL OF DEVELOPMENT (LOD) Ricca Design Studios Revit documentation conforms with LOD 200-400 as defined by BIM Forum 2020, Section E1030.80 21-05 Foodservice Equipment, in the following manner: LOD 200 – Design Development Foodservice equipment will be graphically represented within the model as a generic system, object, or assembly and are easily recognizable based on their function, size, and critical clearance requirements. No individual cost metric will be included in the Revit family, but rather will be provided in a file format separate from the model and coordinated to the tagged model. BIMXP design performance standards are not included in Foodservice documentation. RICCA DESIGN STUDIOS PROPOSAL TO: CCY ARCHITECTS RE: ASPEN ARMORY HALL REMODEL DATE: 12.15.23 CULINARY DESIGN 5613 DTC Pkwy, Suite 100, Greenwood Village, CO 80111 | p. 303.221.0500 | f. 303.221.0600 | www.ricca.com 7 LOD 300–Construction Documents Foodservice equipment will be graphically represented within the Building Information Model as a specific system, object, or assembly accurate in terms of quantity, size, shape, critical clearances, location, and orientation. Utility requirements at the connection will be provided in text format. All pathway design between foodservice equipment, such as refrigeration piping, beverage systems, central CO2/oils, ductwork, or any other such equipment, is not included in Ricca plans and are the responsibility of the MEP engineers. Non-graphic information may also be attached to the Model Element at this level of development. The project origin is defined, and the element is located accurately with respect to the project origin. However, no individual cost metric will be included in the Revit family, but rather provided separately from the model as tagged. No serial numbers or asset management parameters will be included. LOD 400–Construction Documents– Supplementary Components While not used for Fabrication Documents,Ricca will add to the project Building Information Model any detailing, fabrication, assembly, and/or field installation information that we deem necessary for the communication of design intent. The selected Kitchen Equipment Contractor is to provide full Fabrication Submittals based on actual construction techniques used by the vendor. No serial numbers or asset management parameters will be included. 22..11 AADDDD AALLTTEERRNNAATTEE –– OOPPEERRAATTIIOONNSS SSTTUUDDYY 2.1.1 Operations Study The basis of the operations study will include the operating needs of a restaurant or food hall in the Aspen market. The study will specifically evaluate the operational structure for the foodservice operation (one vendor vs. individual vendors, shared back of house vs. individual back of house). Additionally, the study will evaluate and make recommendations on the operations can provide affordable food product, inclusive of the need for subsidy and how to measure affordability over time. Ricca will deliver these results in the form of a narrative and presentation to key stakeholders. 22..22 FFOOOODDSSEERRVV IICCEE OOPPTTIIOONNAA LL SSEERRVV IICCEESS 2.3 CONSTRUCTION ADMINISTRATION PHASE Ricca will assist the Architect and provide the following services for the administration of the foodservice contract documents. For expanded on-site foodservice contract administration services, see additional services (3.0). 2.3.1.1 Service Counter Detail Submittal Review Review of submittals and shop drawings to verify conformance with design intent, specifications, and millwork details. 2.3.2 Shop Drawing Review Ricca will review contractor submittals within the scope of its work with the Client, Operator and awarded Kitchen Equipment Contractor in order-to validate conformance to the construction documents and design intent. RICCA DESIGN STUDIOS PROPOSAL TO: CCY ARCHITECTS RE: ASPEN ARMORY HALL REMODEL DATE: 12.15.23 CULINARY DESIGN 5613 DTC Pkwy, Suite 100, Greenwood Village, CO 80111 | p. 303.221.0500 | f. 303.221.0600 | www.ricca.com 8 2.3.3 Requests for Information Ricca will review and respond to RFIs. This may include coordination and clarification of construction documents, submittals and/or field conditions. All requests for information regarding foodservice equipment and installation will be answered in a timely manner. 2.3.4 Site Inspections Ricca will conduct a site inspection after all areas within the foodservice scope of work have been roughed-in, walk-in boxes are installed, and exhaust canopies are hung as applicable. Ricca will conduct a preliminary, and then a final site inspection, where required after all areas within the scope of work are completed and are ready for occupation, following contractor certification of readiness. This will include an inspection of all foodservice equipment specified under Ricca’s construction documents, as well as a review of related architectural, mechanical, plumbing, and electrical work to determine that the installation is in accordance with Ricca’s construction documents and local health/hygiene codes. Ricca will prepare and issue a written site inspection report noting discrepancies and recommendations for remedy after each visit. 33..00 FFOOOODDSSEERRVV IICCEE AADDDDIITTII OONNAALL SSEERRVV IICCEESS The following services are not included in Basic Services. However, Ricca is pleased to provide them if authorized and confirmed in writing by the Client, and they shall be paid for by the Client, in addition to the compensation for Basic Services. 3.0.1 Post-Construction Record Drawings Based on the General Contractor field redlines, Ricca can provide a final set of foodservice post- construction record drawings indicating all changes made to construction documents throughout the construction and installation phases. This includes all changes to equipment resulting from RFIs, change orders, Client directives and value management exercises. 3.0.2 Pre-Design As-Built Drawings Ricca can produce a set of existing conditions “as-built” drawings prior to the commencement of design work. 3.0.3 Existing Equipment Survey and Report Ricca can survey and inventory existing foodservice equipment for potential reuse as appropriate to this project. This inventory would include digital photographic representation, d imensions, utility information, where available and general equipment condition and recommendation. This service includes a site visit with written report, and may, where appropriate, include a service agency representative. RICCA DESIGN STUDIOS PROPOSAL TO: CCY ARCHITECTS RE: ASPEN ARMORY HALL REMODEL DATE: 12.15.23 CULINARY DESIGN 5613 DTC Pkwy, Suite 100, Greenwood Village, CO 80111 | p. 303.221.0500 | f. 303.221.0600 | www.ricca.com 9 3.0.4 Existing Equipment Report Ricca can review and evaluate received inventory of existing foodservice equipment for potential reuse as appropriate to this project. This inventory shall be provided by the Owner’s engineering/maintenance team and should include digital photographic representation, dimensions, utility information, where available and recent equipment repair history. This service includes a written evaluation of received information. 3.0.5 Dimensioned Floor Penetrations While typically provided by the KEC, Ricca can provide dimensioned sleeve penetration plans for conduit and waste piping from center line of structural steel drawings when requested. 3.0.6 Dimensioned Rough ins While typically provided by the KEC, Ricca can prepare 1/4” (1:50) scale drawings that include complete information on the scope of the construction documents, with references to equipment as provided by others. Please note, this service is for informational purposes only; the drawings are design drawings and not intended to be used in construction. They will be dimensioned for design intent for coordination for trades responsible for identifying final locations of exhaust hood duct collars, stubs, and floor and wall sleeves, for ventilation, plumbing, steam, electrical, refrigeration lines, and concrete base/curb dimensions, as required. 3.0.7 Bid Process Management Ricca can provide management of the foodservice bid process on behalf of its Client. Ricca can prepare and distribute bid documents, including bidder instructions, to prospective foodservice dealer/installer; facilitate a pre-bid meeting; and issue, receive, and level bids for review by its Client. Ricca can also participate in negotiation and award of this project to the foodservice equipment dealer/installer. 3.0.8 Construction Phase Revit Model Management Ricca can provide management and upkeep of the project’s Revit model in regard to foodservice equipment only during the construction phase. This effort includes coordination with architect, engineers and awarded kitchen equipment contractor to assure alignment between field installation and the Revit model. 3.0.9 Revisions to Work Previously Approved Time spent on significant revisions to work previously approved; these revisions include work performed to accommodate cost reductions on the project which were previously approved. RICCA DESIGN STUDIOS PROPOSAL TO: CCY ARCHITECTS RE: ASPEN ARMORY HALL REMODEL DATE: 12.15.23 COMPENSATION 5613 DTC Pkwy, Suite 100, Greenwood Village, CO 80111 | p. 303.221.0500 | f. 303.221.0600 | www.ricca.com 10 4.0 BASIS FOR COMPENSATION The Client shall compensate the Consultant for the scope of work and Scope of Services (Basic Services) provided in accordance with this paragraph 4.0 Basis for Compensation, and the other terms and conditions of this agreement, as follows: 4.1 FEE SCHEDULE FOR BASIC SERVICES Compensation for the services listed in this proposal will be on a fixed fee basis for the previously indicated scope of work and Scope of Services, excluding reimbursable expenses and service of any assigned sub-consultants, and will be invoiced monthly reflecting the work completed during that period. The fixed fee will be broken down as follows: Culinary/Kitchen Areas: Enhanced Schematic Design Phase $ 24,930.00 Design Development Phase $ 34,900.00 Construction Documents Phase $ 29,920.00 TToottaall CCuulliinnaarryy DDeessiiggnn FFeeee:: $$ 8899,,77 55 00 ..0000 AAdddd AAlltteerr nnaatt ee :: Operational Study $ 8,740.00 The above fees include the time associated with eight (8) one-person meetings/trips from Ricca’s Denver, CO offices to the project site and/or Client offices. Please note, Ricca reserves the right to revisit our proposed scope & fee upon completion of Program Confirmation and will adjust for any potential changes to the scope. Note that there are numerous inputs that help us arrive at fees quoted beyond the area estimated to be designed. Our fee iiss ccaallccuullaatteedd aass aa ffiixxeedd ff eeee.. AAnn aaff tt eerr -- tthhee-- ffaacctt ccoonnvveerrssiioonn ttoo aann hhoouurr llyy nnoott--ttoo-- eexxcceeeedd ff eeee ddooeessnn’’tt nneecceessssaarriillyy ttooppsseett aatt tthhiiss qquuootteedd ffeeee.. This proposal assumes a congruent, and not a phased by-area design, or phased document issuance process. 4.2 REIMBURSABLE EXPENSES Reimbursable expenses are in addition to the above fees. Reimbursable expenses include, but are not limited to, items such as airfare, lodging, food, transportation, reproductions, mailings/postage, plot and delivery costs requested by the Client and required in the interest of this project. Invoices shall be submitted at cost plus 10% administrative service fee. Note: Airfares are booked at the lowest fare available at the time of booking. These tickets are generally non-refundable; therefore, if meetings/trips are cancelled after booking, the price of the non- refundable ticket will still be billed and considered a reimbursable expense. Consultant will always attempt to re-use the ticket for Client’s next scheduled meeting or trip, with payment of any change fee required by the airline passed along as a reimbursable expense as well. 4.3 COMPENSATION FOR ADDITIONAL SERVICES Should services beyond those listed under Basic Services be authorized in writing by the Client and agreed to by Consultant, they shall be paid for by Client in addition to amounts due for Basic Services compensation. Such compensation shall be computed either on a lump-sum basis or, on an hourly time charge basis using Consultant's standard current billing rates as listed below after approval of a proposal detailing the same: Principal $300.00/hour Director $200.00/hour Project Manager $170.00/hour Associate $140.00/hour NOTE: Billing rates above are subject to a minimum of 3% increase per year from date of contract approval. RICCA DESIGN STUDIOS PROPOSAL TO: CCY ARCHITECTS RE: ASPEN ARMORY HALL REMODEL DATE: 12.15.23 COMPENSATION 5613 DTC Pkwy, Suite 100, Greenwood Village, CO 80111 | p. 303.221.0500 | f. 303.221.0600 | www.ricca.com 11 4.4 PAYMENT TERMS 4.4.1 Billings Ricca will submit invoices monthly for Basic Services and Additional Services and reimbursable expenses reflecting the work accomplished in the billing period. 4.4.2 Carrying Costs Invoices are due and payable upon receipt. To cover the costs of carrying receivables in excess of thirty (30) days after receipt of Ricca’s invoice, the Client agrees to pay a charge of 2% per month on any portion of its account remaining unpaid. Should it become necessary that an unpaid invoice be referred to Ricca’s attorneys for collection, it is agreed that Client will pay the attorney's reasonable fee for such work as well as any litigation costs. 4.4.3 Payments Withheld Deductions shall not be made from Consultant fees on account of penalty, liquidated damages or other sums withheld from payments to contractors, or on account of the cost of changes in the project, other than those for which Consultant is legally responsible, in accordance with these terms and the scope of work and Scope of Services outlined herein. 5.0 INSURANCE Consultant maintains insurance covering claims, which may arise in the performance of the services outlined under this agreement, i.e., errors, omissions or negligent acts for which Consultant may be legally liable. 5.1 Consultant maintains the following insurance policies; should the Client require additional insurance coverage or limits, the expense of same shall be by Client: General Liability: $2,000,000 per Occurrence, $4,000,000 Aggregate Automobile Liability: $1,000,000 CSL for Hired and Non-Owned Automobiles Umbrella Liability: $5,000,000 per Occurrence, $5,000,000 Aggregate Workers Compensation (WC) and Employers’ Liability (EL): WC - Statutory Limits EL - $2,000,000 each Accident, $2,000,000 Disease Policy Limit Professional Liability (Errors & Omissions): $5,000,000 per Claim, $5,000,000 Aggregate 6.0 MISCELLANEOUS PROVISIONS 6.1 STOPPAGE OF WORK Consultant’s income results from the time invested in its professional services. Although Consultant will make every effort to avoid doing so, Consultant may discontinue work when payments exceed sixty (60) days from billing and reserve this action as its right under this contract. 6.2 INTERRUPTION OF WORK Should Consultant’s work for this project be postponed and then re -started for a period exceeding ninety (90) days from the date of written notice to stop work, Consultant reserves the right to renegotiate remaining fees. 6.3 TERMINATION Consultant recognizes Client’s right to terminate this contract at any time. However, in the event of termination of this contract, Client agrees to pay Consultant in full for services performed to the termination date, plus reimbursable expenses and any costs associated with collection of fees. RICCA DESIGN STUDIOS PROPOSAL TO: CCY ARCHITECTS RE: ASPEN ARMORY HALL REMODEL DATE: 12.15.23 COMPENSATION 5613 DTC Pkwy, Suite 100, Greenwood Village, CO 80111 | p. 303.221.0500 | f. 303.221.0600 | www.ricca.com 12 6.4 USE OF CONSULTANT’S DOCUMENTATION The use of Consultant’s documents for purposes other than those defined in the scope of work on this project is prohibited. These documents shall remain the property of the Consultant. The Client shall be permitted to retain copies, including reproducible copies, for information and reference only. In the case of computer-generated documents, only copies of the original version made by Consultant are entitled for use on this project. 6.5 ARBITRATION Claims, disputes, or other matters in question between Consultant and the Client are subject to and will be decided by arbitration in accordance with the Construction Industry Arbitration Rules of the American Arbitration Association currently in effect. If this proposal/agreement meets with Client’s approval, please sign, date, and return one (1) copy to Consultant. This Agreement executed as of the day and year first written above. This Agreement may be withdrawn or amended if not executed within sixty (60) days of the date first written above. RRIICCCCAA DDEESSIIGGNN SSTTUUDDIIOOSS CCCCYY AARRCCHHIITTEECCTTSS ------------------------------------------------------ ------------------------------------ Sean M. Callnin, FCSI By: President Title: Date Qualifications, Resumes & ProjectReferences PREPARED FOR:Nicole Kinsler C C Y A R C H I T E C T Snkinsler@ccyarchitects.com(970) 927-4925 FRONTIER ENERGY, INC.12949 Alcosta Blvd. Suite 101San Ramon, CA 94583 Page PB Founded by PG&E and operated by Frontier Energy, the Food Service Technology Center (FSTC) has provided education and outreach to the food service industry for more than 30 years. Frontier Energy conducts outreach to equipment manufacturers and dealers to educate them about the benefits of buying energy efficiency equipment, understand rebate and incentive programs, and provides marketing assistance to dealers. The team also conducts extensive outreach and training with a range of customers from students studying cooking and commercial design to national chains like Starbuck’s and McDonald’s so they understand the importance of choosing energy efficient appliances. Because each utility offers different incentive programs, Frontier Energy created a user-friendly one-stop-shop for California’s four large utilities. The website, caenergywise.com, uses approachable graphics, interactive calculators, a do-it-yourself energy assessment, and design guides to help restaurateurs choose the best equipment for their space. The website also serves as an information hub for seminars, workshops, and webinars. Launched in July 2018, the website currently has more than 1,000 unique visitors a month. Location: Nationwide Client: Multiple utilities Duration: 1987–Ongoing Total Budget: $2 million annually FOOD SERVICE TECHNOLOGY CENTER Contact David Zabrowski 925-359-9180 dzabrowski@frontierenergy.com Partnerships with: utilities, restaurant operators, universities, equipment manufacturers, dealers, trade associations, educators T. Bell - 1 Todd Bell Sr Program Manager P ROFILE Todd Bell is a Sr Program Manager with Frontier Energy’s Commercial Food Service Energy Efficiency Division which operates the Food Service Technology Center (FSTC) located in San Ramon, CA. The FSTC is an equipment testing, and training facility wholly devoted to promoting energy and water efficiency in the commercial food service industry. He is responsible for the FSTC’s on-site energy audit program and kitchen equipment specification development services. These services analyze an existing or planned commercial food service operation’s cooking, exhaust ventilation, refrigeration, water heating and sanitation equipment to identify energy, water, and carbon reduction strategies. E DUCATION • B.A., History, University of California Davis - 1994 F RONTIER E NERGY E XPERIENCE Laboratory Technician (1998 – 2004) • Conducted ASTM standard methods to accurately determine the energy and water use of commercial cooking, refrigeration, ventilation, and ware washing equipment under controlled laboratory conditions. Sr Program Manager (2004 – Present) • Visits commercial food service operations of all types to survey the energy using systems present and identify energy, water, and carbon reduction strategies. • Provides comparative analysis of existing and alternate equipment schedules to determine the energy, water and carbon savings associated with the specification of more efficient makes and models. R ELEVANT P ROJECT E XPERIENCE Large Sporting Complex Multi Food Service Concept Gas to Electric Cooking Equipment Schedule Development (2022): Generated alternative electric equipment schedule and performed comparative energy use analysis Large Corporate Campus Cafeteria Kitchen: All Electric “Kitchen of the Future” Cooking Equipment Specification (2020 - 2021): Equipment schedule review and comparative analysis of electric equipment options, participated in kitchen design charrettes Large Corporate Campus Cafeteria Kitchens: Electric Cooking Equipment Specification & Guidebook Development (2018 - 2019): Conducted onsite equipment inventory, interviewed kitchen operator, and generated alternative electric equipment schedule and performed comparative energy use analysis M. Duesler - 1 Mark Duesler Sr Program Advisor / Chef Consultant P ROFILE Mark Duesler is a Sr Program Advisor with Frontier Energy and is the resident Chef Consultant at the company’s Food Service Technology Center (FSTC) located in San Ramon CA. He is a professional chef and has been involved in the foodservice industry for over 25 years, graduating from the California Culinary Academy in 2004, he has worked in multiple full-service concepts from small family-owned restaurants, volume to multi-course fine dining and chef-driven farm to table concepts. His primary role at the FSTC is the operation of the center’s demonstration kitchen which specializes in showing equipment specifiers innovative and energy efficient cooking technologies. Here, the technical data driven foundation of the FSTC meets with the practical real-world considerations necessary to ensure successful adoption of energy efficient cooking appliances. E DUCATION • A.S., Culinary Arts, California Culinary Academy - 2004 F RONTIER E NERGY E XPERIENCE Sr Program Advisor / Chef Consultant (2016 – present) • Conducts cooking equipment demonstrations for specifiers. • Provides detailed reports summarizing the operational characteristics of innovative and energy efficient cooking technologies and their traditional cooking platforms counterparts. R ELEVANT P ROJECT E XPERIENCE Large Sporting Complex Multi Food Service Concept Gas to Electric Cooking Equipment Schedule Development (2022): Supported alternate electric equipment schedule development and conducted in- person electric cooking equipment demonstrations at the Frontier Energy Food Service Technology Center Large Corporate Campus Cafeteria Kitchen: All Electric “Kitchen of the Future” Cooking Equipment Specification (2020 - 2021): Supported equipment schedule review, interviewed kitchen operators and identified practical innovative electric cooking equipment options Large Corporate Campus Cafeteria Kitchens: Electric Cooking Equipment Specification & Guidebook Development (2018 - 2019): Conducted onsite equipment inventory, interviewed kitchen operator, and provided equipment operational characterization briefs Project References Bree Carter OCVibe ��������������������������������������������������������������� Mobile: 714.393.4198 Email:bcarter@ocvibe.com Project: Large retail, entertainment,��������������������������������������������������������������� ������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������� power equ���������������������������������������������������������������������������������������� ���������������������������������������������������������������������������������������� Susan McDonnell, CID, Fe3 McDonnell & Associates Principle Designer 406-206-7266 mcdonnell.susan@yahoo.com www.mcdonnelldesign.com Projects:����������������������������������������������������������������������������������������� ������������gy services have included �������������������������������s focusing on energy efficiency ����������������regardless of fuel source. Many in-person ����������������������s have accompanied these efforts ���������������������������������������ffi����������������� © Frontier Energy – Confidential 1 Proposal for Services Between Todd Kennedy, AIA, Partner CCY ARCHITECTS 228 Midland Ave PO Box 529 Basalt, CO 81621 970-927-4925 ccyarchitects.com And Frontier Energy, Inc. 12949 Alcosta Blvd., Suite 101 San Ramon, CA 94583 Project Name: City of Aspen Armory Hall Reuse Project All Electric Food Service Operations Design Support Project Time Frame: Q1 – Q3 2024 Project Objectives: The main objective of the project is to promote the specification and successful adoption of electric cooking equipment for the food service operations located in the repurposed Aspen Armory Hall. Further, the project will work to develop an energy and water efficient dish room equipment schedule and support best practice design of the kitchen exhaust ventilation systems. Collaborating with the client’s kitchen architect/designer and other project stakeholders, Frontier Energy will contribute technical support by providing energy use, operating cost, production capacity and practical operating information for the electric cooking equipment considered for the food service operations. Additionally, Frontier Energy will provide technical guidance for the specification of energy and water efficient ware washing equipment to help minimize hot and cold water demands in the dish room. Lastly, through best practice recommendations Frontier Energy will support the design of an energy efficient kitchen exhaust system optimized to ensure capture and contain of cooking effluent. Frontier Energy Consulting Agreement © Frontier Energy – Confidential 2 Cost: Flat Fee of $30,130 Scope: Kitchen Design and Equipment Specification Support • Participate in equipment selection meetings before or during the development of the hotline cooking and ware washing equipment schedules and contribute the following respective operating performance information: o Pre-heat Time o Pre-heat Energy o Idle Energy Rate o Cooking Energy Efficiency o Water Consumption o Throughput Performance o Production Capacity • In addition to the above, provide the following information to better inform equipment selection decisions: o Whether the equipment is ENERGY STAR® labeled and/or listed in the qualified products list of the CA Energy Wise utility instant rebate program for energy efficient commercial food service equipment o Comments on other relevant functional attributes of the electric cooking equipment and how it compares to its traditional natural gas fueled counterparts • Conduct interviews of the kitchen operator/management team to learn the following about how the equipment will be operated: o Days of operation per year o Daily on time per day o Average projected amount of food to be cooked per day • Referencing the above learnings and for comparative purposes, estimate the energy and water use for the equipment considered for specification. Report the following: o Annual Energy Use o Annual Water Use o Average Daily Demand o Maximum Demand o Annual Operating Cost o Annual Carbon Emissions o Simple payback based on the incremental cost difference between makes and models considered for specification. • Dish Room: In addition to the ware washing equipment selection support noted above, provide dish room best practice design recommendations to help minimize the hot and cold-water intensity of the ware washing operation. • Exhaust Ventilation Systems: Review and comment on the kitchen exhaust system specifications and cooking equipment layout to identify ways to optimize cooking effluent capture containment and minimize energy use and carbon intensity. Frontier Energy Consulting Agreement © Frontier Energy – Confidential 3 • For reporting purposes, document the equipment performance information and energy analysis in a PDF’d MS Word formatted document with summary tables and brief written discussion to support the equipment selection. Project Cost: • A flat fee amount of: $30,130 o The flat fee includes all labor and direct expense costs associated with the scope of work. o Frontier Energy Personnel: Todd Bell, Sr Program Manager Mark Duesler, Program Manager & Consultant Chef Michael Slater, Engineer Tentative Project Timeline: Commence project 10 business days following the completion of contractual documents and project deliverables completed and provided to client by a date to be determined. Any work out-of-scope of this Agreement will need to be agreed to by both parties in writing. Out of scope work will be billed on a Time and Materials (T&M) basis in accordance with the following rate schedule: Frontier Energy 2024 & 2025 Rate Schedule: Calendar Year Category 2024 2025 President 324 343 Vice President 319 338 Sr. Director 319 338 Director / Principal Consultant 298 316 Sr. Manager / Engineering Manager 265 281 Manager 235 249 Sr. Engineer / Sr. Program Mgr. 214 227 Engineer / Program Mgr. 178 189 Sr. Program Consultant / Sr. Analyst 162 172 Program Consultant / Analyst 141 149 Sr. Program Coordinator / Sr. Technician 119 126 Program Coordinator / Technician 103 109 Program Associate 86 91 Administrative 80 80 All direct costs for out-of-scope work (travel, materials, etc.) will be billed at cost. 1 FIRM OVERVIEW 600+ Buildings Commissioned 9M+ Sq. Feet of Building Area Monitored 1000+ Completed Energy Models 300+ LEED Certified Projects OUR CORE SERVICES: Transforming the built environment to realize a more resilient future. INDUSTRIES WE SERVE: Affordable Housing Aviation Government Healthcare Higher Education Hospitality K–12 Lab & Research Multi-Family Housing Office Recreation & Libraries Utilities At Group14 we inspire better buildings that are smarter, healthier, and more cost-efficient through innovative energy solutions. Energy Modeling & Consulting Energy Audits Utility Analysis Electrification of Buildings Our sustainability solutions decrease environmental footprint, maximize savings, and enhance occupant wellbeing. We help building owners protect and grow their investments by ensuring that all building systems are installed and operating properly. Energy Sustainability Commissioning Green Building Certification Corporate Social Responsibility Assessment Embodied Carbon Consulting Climate Change Resiliency Mechanical, Electrical & Plumbing (MEP) Commissioning Enclosure Commissioning Fault Detection & Diagnostics (SkySpark) Measurement & Verification Group14 Engineering is a recognized authority in sustainable design, energy efficiency, building commissioning, building analytics software, and building certification consulting. Our firm has completed a number of projects in mountain communities, including 10+ in Aspen. THE SOURCE HOTEL FOOD + MARKET HALL - DENVER 2 RESUMES Laura Charlier, LEED AP BD+C, ID+C PRINCIPAL / SUSTAINABILITY DIRECTOR As the Director of Sustainability at Group14, Laura leads a team of experts to optimize sustainability in the built environment. With over 30 years of experience, she enhances the delivery of design and construction projects. Laura has an extensive understanding of sustainability and green rating system requirements, processes, documentation, and resources. She has experience with multiple sustainability rating systems, including all versions, and rating systems of LEED, Green Globes, CHPS, and WELL Building. ALIGNMENT WITH THIS PROJECT: • Laura is Group14’s Sustainability Team Leader • Laura oversees all of Group14’s services related to green building rating systems and embodied carbon analysis, including our work on GSA Building 48 – a net zero adaptive reuse project Project Experience • Rio Blanco County Historic Courthouse Remodel, Meeker, CO • The Source, Denver, CO • Zeppelin Station, Denver, CO • Candelas Community Center, Arvada, CO • Eagle View Adult Center, Brighton, CO • National Western Center Legacy Building, Denver, CO • Durango Public Library, Durango, CO • Mead Town Hall and Fire Station, Mead, CO • Rifle Library, Rifle, CO • Riverside Library, Evans, CO • Teton County Library, Jackson, WY • Arvada Police Department, Arvada, CO • DEN Airport, Denver, CO Sustainability & Utilities On-Call CCB & CCC East Expansion Great Hall AA & SWA Tenant Fit Outs DEN Fire Station #35 DEN Wally Park DEN A East Ground Loading CEP Concourse Renewal EDUCATION A.S., Occupational Studies, Interior Design, Colorado Institute of Art LICENSES & CERTIFICATIONS U.S. Green Building Council LEED AP BD+C and ID+C 3 RESUMES Lauren McNeill, LEED AP BD+C, LFA, GGP, EcoDistricts AP SENIOR SUSTAINABILITY PROJECT MANAGER Lauren has over 13 years of experience in the sustainable building industry. Her experience includes project management on over 100 LEED projects, two projects pursuing the Living Building Challenge, and a CORE project. Lauren specializes in how buildings can enhance occupant health and wellbeing through red-list free material selection and the incorporation of biophilic design principles. ALIGNMENT WITH THIS PROJECT: • Lauren is an experienced charette facilitator and will help the owner and design team align on sustainability goals for the project • Lauren has helped certify over 100+ LEED projects to date and is presently the project manager for Aspen Distillery, a project seeking the Living Building Challenge in the Roaring Fork Valley • Lauren specializes in building materials with focus on human health, biophilic design principles, and environmental impacts, including embodied carbon Project Experience • Aspen Distillers, Aspen, CO • Rio Blanco County Historic Courthouse Remodel, Meeker, CO • Northglenn City Hall, Northglenn, CO • Denver Wastewater, Denver, CO • Galeton Fire Station, Galeton, CO • Hudson Town Hall, Hudson, CO • MVFD Erie Maintenance Building, Erie, CO • Lochbuie Town Hall, Lochbuie, CO • Lefthand Fire Station, Boulder, CO • Arvada Delta Sector Community Station, Arvada, CO • Denver Fire Station 40, Denver, CO • Swansea Recreation Center, Denver, CO • Westwood Recreation Center, Denver, CO • Montezuma County Courthouse, Cortez, CO • National Western Center Legacy Building, Denver, CO • Zeppelin Station, Denver, CO EDUCATION B.A. Economics, Michigan State University Specialization in Environmental Economics and Public Policy LICENSES & CERTIFICATIONS U.S. Green Building Council LEED Accredited Professional in Building Design and Construction Living Future Accredited & International Living Future Institute Ambassador Certified Green Globes Professional EcoDistricts Accredited Professional 4 RESUMES Libby Coleman, PE, LEED AP BD+C ENERGY PROJECT MANAGER Libby is a Professional Engineer with over five years of experience in the building energy field. Libby works with design teams to evaluate cost-effective energy design solutions and energy code compliance using building energy models. Libby’s modeling specialization is with OpenStudio and EnergyPlus in a wide array of building types. She provides training on the current energy codes and conducts research on electrification solutions and new technology. Libby also develops in-house tools and databases to streamline energy modeling processes and enhance consulting services. ALIGNMENT WITH THIS PROJECT: • Libby is a professional engineer and senior energy modeler for Group14 Engineering • Libby specializes in electrification and energy code compliance, as evident in her work with City of Denver’s Climate Action Sustainability & Resiliency (CASR) team to develop a Net Zero Energy Resource Hub Project Experience • Burlingame Childcare Center, Aspen CO • Carbondale Aquatics, Carbondale, CO • Denver Wastewater, Denver, CO • Denver Fire Station 40, Denver, CO • Denver Police Department District 6, Denver, CO • Jackson Hole Recreation Center, Jackson Hole, WY • Gunnison Services Center, Gunnison, CO • City and County of Denver CASR Net Zero Energy Resource Hub, Denver, CO • Colorado School of Mines, Early Childhood Education, Golden, CO • Athmar Park Library, Denver, CO • Pauline Robinson, Denver, CO • GSA Building 40, Denver, CO • Northern Colorado Water Conservancy District • Berthoud • Western Slope EDUCATION M.S. Architectural Engineering, University of Colorado, Boulder B.S. Civil Engineering, University of Vermont LICENSES & CERTIFICATIONS U.S. Green Building Council LEED Accredited Professional in Building Design and Construction Licensed Professional Engineer in CA, CO Aspen Distillers ASPEN, CO PROJECT DATA Square Footage: 15,000 Living Building Challenge (LBC) LEED Platinum Cost: confidential REFERENCE David Pfiefer, President Anderson Mason Dale Architects dpfeifer@amdarchitects.com 303.294.9448 GROUP14 SERVICES PROVIDED • Charrette Facilitation • Sustainability Consulting • Whole Building Life Cycle Analysis • Energy Modeling • Fundamental, Enhanced, Enclosure & Monitoring-based Commissioning • HERS Rating for Residential Units Aspen Distillers is designed to become the world's first distillery to achieve the Living Building Challenge; an accolade only 28 projects have achieved worldwide. The project will also earn LEED v4 BD+C Platinum certification. Group14 is providing sustainability consulting, energy modeling, and commissioning services on this ambitious project. The 8-acre site includes seven buildings; the Distillery, a Rickhouse for barrel storage, a headquarters for Aspen Distillers, a pumphouse for the on-site wastewater treatment, and three small residential buildings for staff. Half of the site is designated for regenerative farming practices that will provide local food to the Roaring Fork Valley. The project is all electric, will operate net zero energy with a solar photovoltaic array on & off site and will achieve a 20% minimum reduction of embodied carbon with the use of the whole building life cycle analysis. The project also features an on-site wastewater treatment plant that will utilize closed loop systems for the distilling production cycle. This practice will result in 90% of input water returning to the local hydrology. This system along with an on-site well, septic system, and ditch-water for irrigation will fulfill the net zero water imperative of the Living Building Challenge. Group14 is also responsible for vetting all materials against the Red List to ensure no chemicals of concern are used during construction. RELEVANT PROJECTS 6 GSA BUILDING 48 DENVER, CO PROJECT DATA Square Footage: 150,000 Pursuing LEED Gold and SITES Silver Cost: $47M REFERENCE Matthew Bartels Cannon Design mbartels@cannondesign.com 720.644.4047 GROUP14 SERVICES PROVIDED • Sustainability consulting • Monitoring-based commissioning • Building enclosure • Energy consulting The modernization of GSA’s Denver Federal Center Building 48 involved converting a vacant warehouse into an efficient, all-electric office space for the Interior Department. The project is pursuing LEED Gold & SITES Silver and is designed for net-zero energy and net-zero carbon emissions. The project is meeting net-zero energy with a design that includes a 200 kW on-site solar array and an existing PV array adjacent to the site. Other energy efficient measures have involved optimizing the building envelope, reducing lighting loads and installing highly efficient systems. This renovation doubles as a federal government pilot project for tracking reduction of embodied carbon emissions in design and construction. GSA plans to document lessons learned, and use them to develop baselines for other projects aimed at carbon emission reduction. The building is demonstrating an 87% reduction in embodied carbon through adaptive reuse and material selection alone. Other notable sustainable features of the project include: • Over 40% reduction of indoor water use for flow & flush fixtures • Over 85% waste & demolition diversion from landfill • Over 50% annual energy cost savings RELEVANT PROJECTS 7 The Source Hotel DENVER, CO PROJECT DATA Square Footage: 90,850 LEED Gold Cost: $19M REFERENCE Chris Woldom Zeppelin Development chris@zeppelinplaces.com 303.607.5439 GROUP14 SERVICES PROVIDED • LEED fundamental and enhanced commissioning • Energy modeling • LEED consulting The Source Hotel is an 90,850 SF, eight-story hotel that connects to the existing retail hub, also called The Source. The 100-key boutique hotel located in the RiNo District, is LEED certified and includes a pedestrian bridge on level two of the hotel connecting to the existing Source market. Other amenities include a food-centric retail space with two distinctive restaurants, a New Belgium brewery, a knife shop, and centrally located kiosks featuring rotating vendors in the podium levels. Highlights of this project include: • Targeting 23% energy cost savings relative to the ASHRAE 90.1-2007 baseline • Reduction of 37% potable indoor water use • Occupancy Sensors & LED Lighting • 100% Green Power • 50% Construction waste diverted from the landfill • Indoor air quality performance relative to ASHRAE62.1-2007 RELEVANT PROJECTS ASPEN ARMORY HALL December 8, 2023 Todd Kennedy CCY 970-948-6054 We are pleased to submit this proposal for a Sustainability Charrette and Energy services for the Aspen Armory Hall project. Position Team Leader Engineer II TOTAL HOURS TOTAL FEE Rate $212 $144 Schematic Design Hours 40 40 80 - Total SD Fee $8,480 $5,760 - $14,240 Design Development Hours 12 32 44 - Total DD Fee $2,544 $4,608 - $7,152 Construction Document Hours 12 36 48 - Total CD Fee $2,544 $5,184 - $7,728 TOTAL 172 $29,120 Phase Scope Schematic Design Hours In an early virtual collaborative design session, the entire team will address site, water, energy, materials and resources and indoor environmental quality. It is intended to map out a strategy for achieving the project's energy, sustainability, and operating goals – along with agreement and buy-in from all parties and within the restrictions of the budget. Group14 will model the building and analyze several different system options including envelope, lighting, and HVAC. Group14 will meet with the team up to two times to discuss the modeling results, and review comments and recommendations. Design Development Hours Group14 will update the energy model up to two times in DD’s to ensure the project is meeting the energy code requirements and energy savings goals. Group14 will support the design team through DD’s on design decisions affected by energy efficiency. Group14 will meet with the team up to two times to review our comments and recommendations. Construction Development Hours Group14 will finalize the energy modeling based upon 90% CD's. Energy code documentation will be provided for permitting. GROUP14 HOURLY RATES The following rates are estimated for 2024-2028. Position 2024 Billing Rates 2025 Billing Rates 2026 Billing Rates 2027 Billing Rates 2028 Billing Rates Principal $259 $269 $280 $291 $303 Service Director $241 $251 $261 $271 $282 Team Leader, Sr. Engineer III $212 $220 $229 $238 $248 Sr. Project Manager II, Sr. Engineer II $202 $210 $218 $227 $236 Sr. Project Manager I, Sr. Engineer I $182 $189 $197 $205 $213 Project Manager II, Engineer IV $163 $170 $177 $184 $191 Project Manager I, Engineer III $153 $159 $165 $172 $179 Engineer II, Consultant II $144 $150 $156 $162 $168 Engineer I, Consultant I $131 $136 $141 $147 $153 Tech Support $106 $110 $114 $119 $124 Admin Support $91 $95 $99 $103 $107 Please let me know if you have any questions on our proposal. We appreciate the opportunity and look forward to working on this project! Sincerely, Laura Charlier, LEED AP BD+C, ID+C Principal | Sustainability Team Leader lcharlier@group14eng.com | (720) 221-1074 2 The Parlor concept is intended to utilize Meriwether’s dining, hospitality, and resort experience to build innovative and financially successful food halls in key U.S. markets. Appealing to urban young professionals and families alike, food halls are an emerging national trend offering a diversity of food options. Parlor represents an opportunity to create a more integrated experience relative to competitive food halls. Meriwether launched the Parlor concept in September 2017 with the purchase of a historic building in the Crossroads neighborhood of Kansas City, MO. Opened in 2018, Parlor is differentiated by a cohesive front of house bar experience with carefully curated food vendors. With the guidance of management, Parlor relies heavily on programming, operations, and systems to foster an environment and culture for success. As the primary focus and revenue gen- erator, Parlor contains multiple bars featuring artisan cocktails and craft beer catering to local market tastes and demands. Address: 1707 Locust St, Kansas City, MO 64108 Phone: (816) 875-4813 Menu: parlorkc.menu PARLOR - KANSAS CITY Parlor is a collection of chefs coming together to advance the concept of what a restaurant could be. Our aim is to curate a diverse group of culinary concepts, paired with inventive cocktails and craft beer, and celebrate it all in an eclectic atmosphere under one roof. Parlor is a comfortable place for people to relax and socialize while enjoying great drinks and phenomenal food from all walks of life. Meriwether | IMMERSED “Parlor is designed to appeal to the changing preferences of today’s culinary consumer, while mitigating many of the traditional investment risks associated with restaurant and bar venues.” Meriwether followed its success in Kansas City, opening a second parlor in Oklahoma City in 2019. Parlor OKC is located in the “Automobile Alley” neighborhood and quickly establishing itself as a vibrant “go to” spot for families and young professionals alike. Address: 11 NE 6th St, Oklahoma City, OK 73104 Phone: (405) 294-4740 Menu: parlorokc.com PARLOR - OKLAHOMA CITY 2 BARS. 7 CULINARY CONCEPTS. Our two level space holds several unique spots to soak up the atmosphere: a lounge, second story garden patio, and an event space for any and all of your social needs. And don’t forget Parlor’s piéce de résistance, not one, but two(!) incredible bars featuring craft beer and house created artisanal cocktails. “Beyond vendor selection, Meriwether Companies will be responsible for the day-to-day operations including the bar, wait staff, PR, brand positioning, social media and advertising.” Meriwether | IMMERSED Provide operational expertise to increase revenue, improve productivity, and increase staff retention for a popular bar and grille eatery. Collaborate with teams across Finance, Human Resources, and other departments to compile business strategies for the company. Executive Vice President of Operations Tom's Watch Bar Jun 2014 - May 2018 (4 years) Developed new processes for training, team member recognition, financial performance, guest satisfaction, theoretical costs, and daily operations which resulted in marked performance improvements. Collaborated with vendors to negotiate purchasing power and maximize rebates, resulting in a lower cost of goods. Spearheaded the development of fully operational teams within high volume full service restaurants who produce industry leading turnover and profit results. Coordinate cross-functionally with Finance, Human Resources, Purchasing, Operations and Construction to achieve desired results. Directed industry leading teams to successfully open and operate restaurants with revenues from $1.5 million to $13 million annually. Regional Manager 4 different concepts Jun 1996 - Jan 2014 (17 years 8 months) Managed all aspects of operations and team development in Colorado, Arizona, New Mexico, Illinois, Michigan, Indiana and Ohio including the opening of 25 new venues. Initiated and supported relationships with vendors by negotiating on prices to achieve the best possible rates for company yet remain a positive client for vendors. Developed beverage programs to expand network of restaurants and grow revenue. Awarded for hard-work, dedication, and positive management expertise by receiving District Manager of the Year three times. Involved in growing the units from 16 to 90 units at Fox and Hound and involved in growing Lonestar from 35 to over 300 units. Doug Winter - page 2 2235 Broadway Boulder, Colorado 80302 We deliver experiences as spectacular as your location. Each of our real estate operations seeks to create an inclusive and inviting community for all generations seeking an adventurous and restorative lifestyle. From our culinary offerings to our curated experiences, like-minded people can connect, refresh, and have fun together. Our vibrant mixed-use, commercial projects generate higher levels of amenity usage and, consequently, greater returns for developers and owners. Immersed, the operating arm of Meriwether Companies, is the go-to partner for extraordinary real estate developments. We bring your dream of an exceptional destination to life, combining play, performance, and wellness. Doug Winter, Vice President of Operations for Immersed Group and Meriwether Company, will be the point person working with CCY and the City of Aspen on the proposed Armory reuse project. Meriwether, through its operating affiliate, Parlor, has pioneered an industry-leading food hall concept with locations in Kansas City and Oklahoma City. We strategically focus on creating and managing additional venues under the Parlor platform, leveraging our team’s expertise in this specific F&B segment.We look forward to providing a study report for the Aspen Armory project, enabling the City Council to evaluate the most sensible operating model for the city and greater community. This evaluation will be based on the projected return on investment and any subsidy that may be required to operate the building. Summary of Scope:1)Provide an operation study evaluating the costs to operate a food hall within a variety of proposed operatingmodels. Including analysis of the following costs:a.Cost of Goods Soldb.Staffing and Payrolli.Salaried Managersii.Hourly Staffc.Variable Costsi. Marketingii. Building Maintenanceiii.Music, Entertainment, Lighting, Temperatured.Fixed Costsi.Occupancy costsii. Insuranceiii. Equipment leasese.Debt Service2)Study building layout for operational efficiencies.a.Bar layout and placementsb.Guest flow/experiencec.Event spaced.Admin/Back of house layout and needs.e.Inventory locations/controls/security.f.Kitchen design for operation efficiencies.i.Sinks, Hoods, refrigeration.ii.Customer interfaceg.Host/Greeting – Initial Experience3)Other items:a.Study of best-in-class vendors and software.b.Vendor relations and set up.c.Kitchen concept reviews and examples.d.Operational SOPs.e. General Manager job description/recruitment Doug Winter dwinter@meriwetherco.com (303) 408-1990 linkedin.com/in/dougwintercoo Summary Thank you for viewing my profile. I have proven experience balancing the strategic goals of an organization with an understanding of the day to day operational needs. With an ability to motivate cross-functional teams, lead development, and train staff members to lead and exceed expectations of the industry, I am a strong collaborative leader. I always bring a positive energy and passion to the operations of any industry, with the ability to deliver leading results and increase business potential. Lastly, I am skilled at implementing strategic processes to solve business problems and strengthen revenue and client database. For more specifics on my areas of expertise please see the list below: • Business Strategy • Operations Management • Staff Retention • Budgeting • Financial Management • Project Management • Process Implementation • Training and Development of Staff Members • Motivational Leadership • Improving Profitability Experience Vice President of Operations Immersed Group May 2022 - Present (1 year 8 months) Responsibilities include operations management, project development and design consultation for for multiple experiential ventures. Including food halls, bars, restaurants, event spaces and other places for people to gather and enjoy. Vice President of Operations Meriwether Companies Jul 2019 - Present (4 years 6 months) Responsible for operations and development of The Parlor Food Hall. Developing strategic initiatives across all discipline's to grow the brand. Crafting a culture were we act team member first allowing a memorable Guest experience. While at the same time exceeding expectations for all stake holders. Chief Operating Officer ViewHouse Eatery, Bar & Rooftop Jun 2018 - Dec 2018 (7 months) Provide operational expertise to increase revenue, improve productivity, and increase staff retention for a popular bar and grille eatery. Collaborate with teams across Finance, Human Resources, and other departments to compile business strategies for the company. CCoonnssuullttiinngg EEnnggiinneeeerrss •• MMeecchhaanniiccaall •• SSttrruuccttuurraall •• EEnneerrggyy CCrreesstteedd BBuuttttee && GGoollddeenn CCoolloorraaddoo •• rreeggiinncc..ccoomm QQuuaalliiffiiccaattiioonnss SSttaatteemmeenntt SSeerrvviicceess • SSttrruuccttuurraall engineering • MMeecchhaanniiccaall engineering • EElleeccttrriiccaall engineering • PPlluummbbiinngg engineering • CCoommmmiissssiioonniinngg of building energy systems • BBuuiillddiinngg ssiimmuullaattiioonn to support design goals or LEED registration • EEnneerrggyy aauuddiittiinngg for commercial and complex buildings • LLeeggaall,, ffoorreennssiicc, and expert witness testimony • CCoonnssuullttiinngg for energy efficiency research, emerging technologies, and utility issues Resource Engineering Group, Inc. (REG) provides a unique set of engineering skills for projects across the country and the world. We live and breathe resource efficiency, and specialize in designing mechanical and structural systems to aggressively reduce material and energy use. In addition to full S-M-E-P services with internal coordination between engineering disciplines, REG engineers are also active in forensic structural analysis, commissioning, re-commissioning, energy auditing, and general troubleshooting to make buildings run better. WWhhyy CChhoooossee UUss?? REG brings a unique package of qualifications to building projects. Our background includes: • Building science—a deep understanding of how heat, moisture, and energy move through buildings. • Cross-pollination—the complete approach that comes from having structural, mechanical, and electrical engineering under one roof. • Resource awareness—our passion for reducing the environmental impacts of buildings— the reason the firm was founded. • Street smarts—the knowledge of what it takes to build and operate buildings in the real world, tempered by hundreds of projects over two decades. • Political sensitivity—gained from experience serving on boards and working with high- profile clients. • Communication—whether drawn, written, or spoken—the right message, using the appropriate media, on time, with the attention to detail you expect from engineers, and the clarity you might not. • Diverse experience—we work in locations around the globe, on a wide range of building types, working with client’s ranging from Owner-Builders to world renowned Architects. CCoonnssuullttiinngg EEnnggiinneeeerrss •• MMeecchhaanniiccaall •• SSttrruuccttuurraall •• EEnneerrggyy CCrreesstteedd BBuuttttee && GGoollddeenn CCoolloorraaddoo •• rreeggiinncc..ccoomm MMeecchhaanniiccaall EEnnggiinneeeerriinngg——OOuuttssiiddee tthhee BBooxx REG specializes in innovative and alternative mechanical engineering. We start by working with the design team to minimize heating and cooling loads, which allows us to use smaller systems or natural processes. We then design right-sized systems that can be effectively controlled and maintained. REG’s work is informed by extensive experience and collaboration with contractors. Our mechanical systems often incorporate technologies such as solar hot water, ground source heat pumps, radiant cooling, solar-integrated radiant heating, passive night-sky heat rejection, CO2 detection for ventilation control, variable speed fan and pump control, and condensing-modulating boilers. SSttrruuccttuurraall EEnnggiinneeeerriinngg——GGeettttiinngg iitt RRiigghhtt The REG structural team has a wealth of experience, including modern museums and theatres, high-end custom homes, industrial plants, and even adobe houses in Uganda. Our passion is to create elegant structures that integrate seamlessly into the architecture. In the process, we minimize the size of the structural members, creating an economical, efficient, and environmentally friendly solution. Our structural engineers often cross over to work in other disciplines at REG, giving our clients the benefit of a holistic engineer who knows how to integrate other building systems (mechanical, electrical, and plumbing) into the structural system. EElleeccttrriiccaall EEnnggiinneeeerriinngg——PPoowweerriinngg UUpp Electrical engineering is an important complement to our innovative mechanical engineering services. In addition to providing clear and concise electrical plans, we help clients consider major electrical system choices, such as single vs. polyphase service, primary vs. secondary delivery, and the extent of backup power systems. With our electric utility experience, we can effectively coordinate rate, delivery, and policy negotiations with the local electric company. We can integrate on-site renewable generation to offset electrical consumption, whether grid-tied or off-the-grid. REG also monitors electric industry developments, including technology for distributed generation, dispatchable storage, metering and dashboard products, and smart grid integration. CCoonnssuullttiinngg EEnnggiinneeeerrss •• MMeecchhaanniiccaall •• SSttrruuccttuurraall •• EEnneerrggyy CCrreesstteedd BBuuttttee && GGoollddeenn CCoolloorraaddoo •• rreeggiinncc..ccoomm CCoommmmiissssiioonniinngg——MMaakkiinngg iitt WWoorrkk Commissioning is the process of making sure things work like they are supposed to. REG’s substantial commissioning experience has turned up just about every conceivable building operation issue, including backward-running fans, failed sensors, broken damper actuators, missing control wires, variable-speed pumps running continuously at full speed, and so on. Modern buildings are complicated, and they need to be checked and rechecked to make sure they are operating properly. REG’s commissioning work is informed by our focus on energy efficiency and our long history of designing systems with alternative approaches and advanced control strategies. We have strong relationships with HVAC and controls vendors and installers, and we’ve logged enough time in mechanical rooms and crawlspaces to have seen everything from old pneumatics to the latest GUI DDC interfaces. CCoonnssuullttiinngg EEnnggiinneeeerrss •• MMeecchhaanniiccaall •• SSttrruuccttuurraall •• EEnneerrggyy CCrreesstteedd BBuuttttee && GGoollddeenn CCoolloorraaddoo •• rreeggiinncc..ccoomm KKeeyy SSttaaffff JJ.. AAuugguusstt HHaasszz PP..EE..,, PPrreessiiddeenntt aanndd PPrriinncciippaall EEnnggiinneeeerr August has overall responsibility for the day-to-day operation of the company, oversight of all scopes of work REG provides and detailed engineering including mechanical system design, structural systems, energy auditing, commissioning for new and existing buildings, building simulation, and solar energy analysis. August’s engineering mastery, creative attitude, and innate sense for completing complex projects on time and budget have allowed him to compile an impressive track record of successful projects at REG over the course of more than a decade. His project experience includes passive heating and cooling strategies, active solar thermal and solar electric systems, ground source heat pumps, and radiant cooling systems. His past experience includes fundamental research into glass and ceramic materials, water pump design, and water and wastewater plant operation. August also manages REG’s staffing, project scheduling and budgeting, risk management and multi-discipline project delivery. August earned a Bachelor of Science degree in Glass Engineering Science from the New York State College of Ceramics at Alfred University, with honors. He is LEED accredited, NCEES registered, and a member of ASHRAE. He is a licensed Professional Engineer in Colorado, California, Massachusetts, Montana, New York, New Jersey, Texas, Utah, Vermont and Wyoming. DDooddssoonn HHaarrppeerr PP..EE..,, SS..EE..,, VViiccee--PPrreessiiddeenntt && PPrriinncciippaall EEnnggiinneeeerr Dodson Harper leads the Structural Engineering Department at Resource Engineering Group as well as oversight of MEP systems engineering. His responsibilities include structural design, forensic analysis, SMEP project management and managing staffing, project control (schedule and budget), risk management, hardware/software acquisition and maintenance, and in-house training for REG. Dodson’s ability to understand the big picture view of projects has built a long history of on-time/on-budget projects for over 10 years at REG. His project experience includes residential, commercial, and institutional spaces for both new construction and remodels. In addition to designing with conventional steel, wood, and concrete systems, Dodson is a recognized expert in alternative building systems such as straw bale and clay-straw techniques. His extensive contracting and framing experience is invaluable when construction problems need to be solved. Dodson earned a Bachelor of Arts in Mathematics with Honors from Westminster College in Fulton Missouri, and a Bachelor of Science in Civil Engineering with Honors from Colorado State University. He is a registered Professional Engineer in Colorado, Florida, and Vermont, and a registered Structural Engineer in Idaho and Utah. CCoonnssuullttiinngg EEnnggiinneeeerrss •• MMeecchhaanniiccaall •• SSttrruuccttuurraall •• EEnneerrggyy CCrreesstteedd BBuuttttee && GGoollddeenn CCoolloorraaddoo •• rreeggiinncc..ccoomm ZZaacchhaarryy GGuussttaaffssoonn PP..EE,, SSeenniioorr PPrroojjeecctt EEnnggiinneeeerr Zack Gustafson is an engineer with a unique background and a deep knowledge base of all things mechanical. His ability to puzzle through difficult problems makes him an invaluable contributor to complicated building projects, often by finding elusive but simple solutions. In addition to being a capable and clever system designer, he provides building simulation, energy auditing, and commissioning services. In his previous work as an acoustical engineer, Zack developed consumer products including microphone and audio systems and was named on four patents. Part of Zack’s practical knowledge of mechanical systems comes from his experience as Facility Manager of a remote lodge with 15 buildings. His skills also include engine repair, bicycle and motorcycle construction, data/wifi/phone systems, off-grid living, and other assorted wizardry. Zack holds a Bachelor of Science degree in Mechanical Engineering from Calvin College in Michigan. He is a registered Professional Engineer in Colorado. CCoonnssuullttiinngg EEnnggiinneeeerrss •• MMeecchhaanniiccaall •• SSttrruuccttuurraall •• EEnneerrggyy CCrreesstteedd BBuuttttee && GGoollddeenn CCoolloorraaddoo •• rreeggiinncc..ccoomm AArrlliissss MMeerrrreellll,, PP..EE..,, PPrroojjeecctt EEnnggiinneeeerr Arliss is an engineer with extensive experience in the HVAC Engineering industry. His background in construction and engineering has supported a wide range of projects with municipalities, K-12, higher education and residential clients over the last 10 years. Arliss also has firsthand experience with high- end HVAC systems for art museums and radiant cooling. Some areas of interest include chilled water plant design, heating water plants, natatoriums, ground source, solar thermal, VRF systems and ventilation rate procedures. Arliss provides clients with innovative solutions focused on reducing their utility and operational costs and improving their operations. Arliss earned a Bachelor of Science degree in Mechanical Engineering from Clarkson University. He is a registered Professional Engineer in Colorado. JJoonnnnyy HHoollttoonn,, EE..II..TT..,, PPrroojjeecctt EEnnggiinneeeerr Jonny Holton designs mechanical and plumbing systems for a wide variety of building types. His experience includes ground source heat pump system design, radiant cooling, hydronic heating and cooling with air-source heat pump systems, high-efficiency boiler retrofits, plumbing designs for historic building renovations and luxury modern projects, mechanical system design coordinated with off-the-grid power generation, and commissioning of complex building systems. Jonny’s responsibilities include development of software tools for accurate system sizing, energy analysis using the EnergyPlus modeling platform, and 3D intelligent modeling (BIM) of commercial and residential buildings. Previously, Jonny worked as a project manager in the medical device manufacturing industry. His positive attitude and collaborative mindset are invaluable. CCoonnssuullttiinngg EEnnggiinneeeerrss •• MMeecchhaanniiccaall •• SSttrruuccttuurraall •• EEnneerrggyy CCrreesstteedd BBuuttttee && GGoollddeenn CCoolloorraaddoo •• rreeggiinncc..ccoomm Jonny earned a Bachelor’s Degree from the University of Colorado, Boulder. He is a member of ASHRAE, and a NCEES-registered Engineer-in-Training. HHaannnnaahh MMaallllooyy,, PPrroojjeecctt EEnnggiinneeeerr Hannah provides structural engineering and project management. She specializes in engineering resource efficient structural systems for a variety of building types including multi-family affordable housing, single family and luxury residential projects. Hannah is adept at finding simple solutions to complex engineering challenges. Her previous experience in aerospace engineering, retrofitting interiors for the Boeing 777 and Airbus A350, enabled her to travel and collaborate with engineers and manufacturers from many different countries and cultures. She also worked as a researcher investigating seismic hazards in the deserts of New Mexico near the Los Alamos National Lab. Hannah's diverse engineering background provides her with the perspective to be a flexible and creative problem solver. Hannah earned a Bachelor of Science in Civil / Structural Engineering from the University of Vermont. CCoonnssuullttiinngg EEnnggiinneeeerrss •• MMeecchhaanniiccaall •• SSttrruuccttuurraall •• EEnneerrggyy CCrreesstteedd BBuuttttee && GGoollddeenn CCoolloorraaddoo •• rreeggiinncc..ccoomm DDrreeww LLaarrssoonn,, EE..II..TT..,, PPrroojjeecctt EEnnggiinneeeerr Drew began his engineering career working at a structural engineering firm in the Roaring Fork Valley engineering residential projects. He then spent over a decade as the Director of Research for the Aspen Sports Medicine Foundation. Here he published numerous peer reviewed scientific articles while broadening and sharpening his engineering skills solving unique problems. He presented this research all the way up to the international level and served as a reviewer for biomedical and orthopedic journals. Throughout this time, Drew also worked with biomedical companies on the design of medical devices and implants for the field of sports medicine. In addition to experience framing homes in Aspen, Drew recently designed and built his family’s home here in Crested Butte—he is familiar firsthand with the challenges of construction. Drew is excited to be bringing his career full circle at REG and once again providing structural engineering. His responsibilities include design of wood, steel, and concrete structures, as well as construction assistance. Drew earned a Bachelor of Science degree in Mechanical Engineering from the University of Kansas. He loves living, working, and playing in the Gunnison Valley with his wife and three boys. CCoonnssuullttiinngg EEnnggiinneeeerrss •• MMeecchhaanniiccaall •• SSttrruuccttuurraall •• EEnneerrggyy CCrreesstteedd BBuuttttee && GGoollddeenn CCoolloorraaddoo •• rreeggiinncc..ccoomm AAffffiilliiaattiioonnss aanndd CCeerrttiiffiiccaattiioonnss:: (Partial Listing) • AAmmeerriiccaann SSoocciieettyy ooff HHeeaattiinngg,, RReeffrriiggeerraattiinngg,, aanndd AAiirr--CCoonnddiittiioonniinngg EEnnggiinneeeerrss ((AASSHHRRAAEE))—full member since 1992. • UU..SS.. GGrreeeenn BBuuiillddiinngg CCoouunncciill ((UUSSGGBBCC))— member since 2002 • AAmmeerriiccaann SSoollaarr EEnneerrggyy SSoocciieettyy ((AASSEESS))— member since 1999 • IInntteerrnnaattiioonnaall GGrroouunndd SSoouurrccee HHeeaatt PPuummpp AAssssoocciiaattiioonn ((IIGGSSHHPPAA))—member since 1998 • UUSSGGBBCC LLeeaaddeerrsshhiipp iinn EEnneerrggyy aanndd EEnnvviirroonnmmeennttaall DDeessiiggnn ((LLEEEEDD)) aaccccrreeddiittaattiioonn aanndd pprroojjeeccttss—August Hasz, PE, LEED AP (Advanced Training) • PPrrooffeessssiioonnaall EEnnggiinneeeerr RReeggiissttrraattiioonnss • Colorado • California • Idaho • Florida • Massachusetts • Montana • New Jersey • New Mexico • New York • North Carolina • Texas • Utah • Vermont • Wyoming • AAmmeerriiccaann IInnssttiittuuttee ffoorr SStteeeell CCoonnssttrruuccttiioonn ((AAIISSCC))——mmeemmbbeerr • CCoolloorraaddoo SSttrraaww BBaallee AAssssoocciiaattiioonn ((CCOOSSBBAA)) MMeemmbbeerr • AAPPAA--TThhee EEnnggiinneeeerreedd WWoooodd AAssssoocciiaattiioonn—— MMeemmbbeerr LLiivviinngg BBuuiillddiinngg CChhaalllleennggee:: • CCoommmmuunniittyy RReebbuuiillddss CCaammppuuss——world’s first LBC certified affordable housing project. This project is located in Moab, UT (certification pending final inspections). LLEEEEDD PPrroojjeeccttss:: • RRoocckkyy MMoouunnttaaiinn IInnssttiittuuttee IInnnnoovvaattiioonn CCeenntteerr LLEEEEDD PPllaattiinnuumm • SSnnoowwmmaassss GGoollff CClluubbhhoouussee LLEEEEDD SSiillvveerr • BBrraassaaddaa RRaanncchh SSaalleess BBaarrnn LLEEEEDD GGoolldd • BBrraassaaddaa RRaanncchh FFaarrmmhhoouussee LLEEEEDD GGoolldd • BBrraassaaddaa RRaanncchh GGoollff CClluubbhhoouussee aanndd PPrroo-- SShhoopp LLEEEEDD GGoolldd • KKiivvaa LLooddggee LLEEEEDD SSiillvveerr • DDooeerrrr--HHoossiieerr CCoonnffeerreennccee CCeenntteerr aatt AAssppeenn IInnssttiittuuttee LLEEEEDD GGoolldd • NNeeww CCaassttllee LLiibbrraarryy LLEEEEDD SSiillvveerr • EEllkk CCaammpp RReessttaauurraanntt LLEEEEDD SSiillvveerr • SSaamm’’ss KKnnoobb RReessttaauurraanntt LLEEEEDD GGoolldd • RReeaallDD LLEEEEDD CCII CCeerrttiiffiieedd • MMoouunnttaaiinn FFoorrggee LLEEEEDD CCII CCeerrttiiffiieedd • ZZaannddeerr RReessiiddeennccee LLEEEEDD HHoommee PPllaattiinnuumm CCoonnssuullttiinngg EEnnggiinneeeerrss •• MMeecchhaanniiccaall •• SSttrruuccttuurraall •• EEnneerrggyy CCrreesstteedd BBuuttttee && GGoollddeenn CCoolloorraaddoo •• rreeggiinncc..ccoomm SSeelleecctteedd PPrroojjeeccttss • SSuunnnnyyssiiddee AAffffoorrddaabbllee HHoouussiinngg,, Town of Telluride: Structural, Mechanical, Electrical and Plumbing Engineer of record for 30 units of affordable housing which are estimated to achieve an annual Net Zero Energy goal. This project includes in a mix of tiny homes, apartments and townhomes covering 40,000ft2 and uses a variety of ultra efficient yet affordable strategies to achieve aggressive energy goals. • CCrreesstteedd BBuuttttee CCeenntteerr ffoorr tthhee AArrttss,, Crested Butte, CO: MEP and structural engineer of record and commissioning agent for new 35,000 ft2 performing and community arts facility. Cooling is provided by evaporative cooling and economizers. This project has a variety of space needs, along with tight budget constraints and acoustical requirements. • MMoollllyy GGiibbssoonn LLooddggee,, Aspen, CO: MEP and structural engineer of record for the new 37,500ft2 hotel and neighboring 12,500ft2 of residential units. Cooling and heating provided by VRF systems, all steel super-structure and efficient framing systems. This project includes a restaurant, laundry, conference facilities and a roof top pool experience. • TToowwnn ooff TTeelllluurriiddee IIccee RRiinnkk,, Telluride CO: Mechanical Engineer of record for conversion of the existing outdoor rink into an enclosed and conditioned facility for ice related sports in winter and movie and concert events in summer. REG has worked hand-in-hand with town staff to provide input on operational strategies to optimize efficiency. • TToowwnn ooff TTeelllluurriiddee EEnneerrggyy AAuuddiitt,, Telluride CO: Energy consultant for audits of all Town-owned buildings, resulting in detailed report with recommendations for retrofits and master plan for energy and climate impacts.. • RRMMII IInnnnoovvaattiioonn CCeenntteerr,, Basalt, CO: Commissioning Engineer for the LEED Platinum, energy positive facility, incorporating state of the art holistic building systems approach to minimizing MEP systems. REG provided engineering review through conceptual design and MEP systems testing, as well as continued commissioning of mechanical systems. • SSnnoowwmmaassss VViillllaaggee TToowwnn HHaallll,, Snowmass Village CO: Mechanical engineer of record for new 23,000 ft2 facility including police station, council chambers, and ventilated garage. Mechanical features include modulating condensing boilers and CO2-controlled ventilation. CCoonnssuullttiinngg EEnnggiinneeeerrss •• MMeecchhaanniiccaall •• SSttrruuccttuurraall •• EEnneerrggyy CCrreesstteedd BBuuttttee && GGoollddeenn CCoolloorraaddoo •• rreeggiinncc..ccoomm • SSnnoowwmmaassss VViillllaaggee RReeccrreeaattiioonn FFaacciilliittyy,, Snowmass Village CO: Mechanical and structural engineer of record for new 8,000 ft2 facility including five (outdoor) swimming pools/spas, fitness room, and locker rooms. Mechanical features include 33-panel active solar system and heat pump air conditioning that rejects heat to the pool systems. • SSpprruuccee aanndd PPaacciiffiicc AAffffoorrddaabbllee HHoouussiinngg,, Telluride, CO: Mechanical Engineer of record for this 9-unit design- build project located in downtown Telluride. • TToommbbooyy AAffffoorrddaabbllee HHoouussiinngg,, Telluride CO: Mechanical consultant for 16-unit, multi-building housing complex on a challenging downtown site. (Project is now known as Mendota Affordable Housing.) • WWhheeeelleerr OOppeerraa HHoouussee,, Aspen, CO: Mechanical engineer of record for remodel of approx. 15,000 ft2 of the historic facility. The scope of remodel included all elements of the mechanical system outside of the boiler plant and theater air-handler. Fitting modern high-efficiency equipment into historic spaces, for diverse uses including office spaces a commercial kitchen, lobby spaces, conference rooms and back-of-house performer spaces while meeting acoustic and space constraints required inventive solutions. Currently in design phase as the M, E and P engineer of record for the remodel of 2nd and 3rd levels as well as the main entry lobby. • AAssppeenn CCiittyy HHaallll HHVVAACC//EEnneerrggyy AAuuddiitt ++ RReettrrooffiitt DDeessiiggnn,, Aspen CO: Conducted site investigation of the town’s historic armory building, including all HVAC systems, and prepared report describing opportunities for retrofits to improve performance and control energy consumption as well as engineering of various improvements. • JJeeffffeerrssoonn CCoouunnttyy,, CCOO:: Facility wide audit of the County office buildings, courtrooms, detention facilities, road & bridge shops to assist in building a database of assets for facility management purposes and long-term budgeting of maintenance and operational costs. • PPaaeeppcckkee CCeenntteerr AAuuddiittoorriiuumm,, Aspen Institute, Aspen CO: Mechanical and structural engineer of record and commissioning agent for extensive remodel and expansion of 17,000 ft2 performance, library, gallery and office facility with pond-loop geo- exchange heating and cooling, strict noise criteria, and difficult site constraints. • EEll MMaannggllee,, LLaa PPaazz,, BBaajjaa SSuurr,, MMeexxiiccoo:: Mechanical, electrical, and plumbing engineering for redevelopment of a brownfield site into a campus for international conferences, local non-profits, visiting research groups and education. The campus includes 500+ seat conference hall, long term and short-term hospitality facilities, CCoonnssuullttiinngg EEnnggiinneeeerrss •• MMeecchhaanniiccaall •• SSttrruuccttuurraall •• EEnneerrggyy CCrreesstteedd BBuuttttee && GGoollddeenn CCoolloorraaddoo •• rreeggiinncc..ccoomm multiple office buildings and support spaces. The campus will use a self-sustaining micro-grid to achieve Net Zero annual energy consumption. • AAssppeenn SSkkiiiinngg CCoommppaannyy AAuuddiittss aanndd EEnnggiinneeeerriinngg,, Aspen CO: Provided a wide-variety of building energy audits, efficiency recommendations and detailed design for upgrades, retrofits, renovations and new buildings for facilities ranging in size from 400ft2 to 100,000ft2 spanning nearly 20 years. • RReenneewwaabbllee EEnneerrggyy MMiittiiggaattiioonn PPrrooggrraamm ((RREEMMPP aakkaa EExxtteerriioorr EEnneerrggyy OOffffsseett PPrrooggrraamm oorr EEEEOOPP)) calculations and technical support for a variety of municipalities including: City of Aspen, Pitkin County, Summit County, Breckenridge, Eagle County, Vail, Town of Telluride, San Miguel County, Town of Crested Butte, and City of Basalt. REG supported staff as well as joined various public groups to provide technical assistance to help the public and elected officials make informed decisions. REG created REMP / EEOP spreadsheets for these jurisdictions to account for impacts of exterior energy use and potential offset via solar electric arrays as well as payment in lieu using solar electric installation costs as the metric for determining offset fees. • TToowwnn ooff CCaarrbboonnddaallee DDeeccaarrbboonniizzaattiioonn FFeeaassiibbiilliittyy SSttuuddyy,, CCaarrbboonnddaallee,, CCOO: Evaluated Town owned buildings to identify options for decarbonization be electrification of building HVAC Systems. This work allowed the Town to understand the impacts of building electrification, and prioritize building system renovations. As a follow-up to this effort, REG will be provide MEP engineering for electrification of the Townhall facility in the coming year. • EEaaggllee CCoouunnttyy EElleeccttrriiffiiccaattiioonn CCoonnssuullttaattiioonn,, EEaaggllee CCoouunnttyy,, CCOO: In addition to consulting with the Eagle County Building Code Cohort on the REMP / EEOP program, REG is also contracted to provide engineering services for existing buildings and new affordable housing to provide feasibility studies and detailed engineering for electrification projects to aid Eagle County in achieving their Climate Action goals. • PPiittkkiinn CCoouunnttyy GGrroowwtthh CCooddee CCoonnssuullttaattiioonn,, PPiittkkiinn CCoouunnttyy,, CCOO: In addition to working directly with County staff on recent REMP spreadsheet updates and electrification code consultation, REG is part of a larger team led by Design Workshop to help County evaluate the environmental, social and fiscal impacts of alterations to the code to understand the impacts of local growth while also identifying how to achieve Pitkin County’s Climate Action Plan. • UUnniivveerrssiittyy ooff CCoolloorraaddoo BBoouullddeerr,, MMccAAlllliisstteerr BBuuiillddiinngg,, Boulder, CO: Conversion of a pre-existing telephone data center operations building for CU Boulder facility operations. HVAC systems included a 1,400 ton chilled water plant with water-side economizer as well as a large condensing boiler plant. • PPuueebblloo CCiittyy SScchhoooollss,, DDiissttrriicctt 6600,, Pueblo CO: Provided engineering design for 20+ buildings and schools within the school district. • VViillllaaggee CCoouurrtt AAppaarrttmmeennttss,, Town of Mountain Village, CO: Energy consultant for evaluation of potentially switching from electric to natural gas for the existing heating and DHW systems.. REG presented to Town Council the results of our modeling exercise as well as provided background on the complexities of switching heating fuels and changing energy markets. • AAssppeenn RReeccrreeaattiioonn CCeenntteerr, Aspen CO: Re-commissioning agent for existing facility with lap pool, leisure pool, locker rooms, gyms, NHL size hockey rink, offices, and other functions. CCoonnssuullttiinngg EEnnggiinneeeerrss •• MMeecchhaanniiccaall •• SSttrruuccttuurraall •• EEnneerrggyy CCrreesstteedd BBuuttttee && GGoollddeenn CCoolloorraaddoo •• rreeggiinncc..ccoomm • DDooeerrrr--HHoossiieerr CCoonnffeerreennccee CCeenntteerr, Aspen Institute, Aspen CO: Mechanical engineer of record and commissioning agent for new 20,000 ft2 conference facility with pond-loop geo-exchange heating and cooling, strict noise criteria, and difficult site constraints. • DDeenniissoonn PPllaacceerr AAffffoorrddaabbllee HHoouussiinngg,, BBrreecckkeennrriiddggee, CO: Structural, Mechanical, Electrical and Plumbing Engineer of record for this 24 Building affordable housing project with a total size of approximately 90,000 ft2. This project is Enterprise Green Certified. • CCrreesstteedd BBuuttttee MMoouunnttaaiinn RReessoorrtt AAffffoorrddaabbllee HHoouussiinngg,, Mt. Crested Butte, CO: Mechanical and structural engineering of record for affordable housing complex, 18 units planned, 3 buildings. • BBuurrlliinnggaammee PPhhaassee IIII AAffffoorrddaabbllee HHoouussiinngg,, Aspen, CO: Mechanical Engineer of record for 162-unit workforce housing project. The project was one of the first in the area to use the AIA Integrated Project Delivery (IPD) process, which involves continuous collaboration between the design, estimating, and construction teams. The design also used Building Information Modeling (BIM) with 3-D collision detection to avoid construction conflicts. Individual housing units each have their own heat-recovery ventilators, and condensing DHW water heaters provide all space heating. • AAnntthhrraacciittee AAffffoorrddaabbllee HHoouussiinngg,, Crested Butte, CO: Structural, Mechanical, Electrical and Plumbing Engineer of record for this 30-unit affordable housing project. This project is Enterprise Green Certified and funded with LITCH program. • WWeesstt HHiillllss AAffffoorrddaabbllee HHoouussiinngg,, Keystone CO: Structural and MEP Engineer of record for a twenty building sixty-three unit multi-family complex with a mix of duplex, tri-plex and apartment building types. REG’s implemented shallow frost protected foundation systems and integrated S+MEP systems analysis to reduce construction costs. • SSmmiitthh HHiillllss RRaanncchh,, Silverthorne CO: Structural of record for a twenty-five unit complex containing thirty-three total units in a mix of single family and duplex building types. • CCeenntteennnniiaall AAffffoorrddaabbllee HHoouussiinngg,, Aspen Colorado: Energy audit of existing 142 unit housing complex to determine feasibility and cost savings of various building shell improvements as well as a ground source heat pump system using flooding mining tunnels below the site for the geo-exchanger location. As a follow-up to this work, REG has served as the Owner’s representative during mold remediation work. • AAssppeenn CCiittyy HHaallll CCoouunncciill CChhaammbbeerrss,, Aspen CO: Mechanical Engineer of record for remodel of Council Chambers to reduce energy use and increase occupant comfort. CCoonnssuullttiinngg EEnnggiinneeeerrss •• MMeecchhaanniiccaall •• SSttrruuccttuurraall •• EEnneerrggyy CCrreesstteedd BBuuttttee && GGoollddeenn CCoolloorraaddoo •• rreeggiinncc..ccoomm • PPoowweerrss AArrtt && LLeeaarrnniinngg CCeenntteerr,, Carbondale, CO: 17,000 ft2 private facility to display the artwork of Jasper Johns. Project includes radiant heating and radiant cooling supplied by ground-source heat pump system, with humidity and air quality control to protect artwork. REG provided complete SMEP engineering for the project. • GGuunnnniissoonn PPuubblliicc SSaaffeettyy FFaacciilliittyy aanndd PPuubblliicc WWoorrkkss,, Gunnison, CO: Commissioning agent for approx. 50,000 ft2 public safety facility and 17,000 ft2 public works building. These buildings include diverse uses office spaces, vehicle maintenance facility, jail facility, commercial kitchen, required a blend of air handling systems and controls challenges. • GGuunnnniissoonn CCoouunnttyy CCoouurrtthhoouussee,, Gunnison, CO: Commissioning Agent for approx. 62,000 ft2 county offices and courthouse facility. These buildings include diverse uses office spaces, sally port and temporary holding location, council chambers and county court. REG’s involvement allowed for nearly $500,000 reduction in HVAC installation budget with limited reduction in occupant comfort. • TThhiirrdd SSttrreeeett CCeenntteerr,, Carbondale CO: Mechanical Engineer of record and commissioning agent for major renovation of 44,000-ft2 former school complex into new center for local non-profits, including extensive modeling and design work to develop low-energy systems. • TThhee LLiittttllee NNeellll,, Aspen, CO:: Mechanical Engineer of Record and Commissioning Agent for various projects including: boiler plant retrofit, energy systems evaluation and kitchen remodel. These projects required REG to work closely with TLN engineering staff and installation contractors to eliminate and/or minimize downtime for the hotel while juggling complicated existing systems with various layers of retrofits and physical constraints. • KKiittttiittiiaann HHiillll,, Island of St. Kitts, St. Kitts & Nevis: A luxury resort focused on sustainability. Project includes 84 cottages, 80+ villas, multiple restaurants, 150+ pools, multi-use commercial zone and a 75+ unit hotel. REG provided complete MEP engineering for the majority of buildings, select structural engineering and engineering of the electrical infrastructure. • KKooii RReessoorrtt,, IIssllaanndd ooff SStt.. KKiittttss,, SStt.. KKiittttss && NNeevviiss: Providing MEP services coordination, peer review and commissioning for the luxury, 442 room hotel with dining, spa, gym, and extensive pools. Challenges include coordinating with design team spread across the globe and working with local infrastructure availability. • NNeeww BBeellggiiuumm BBrreewwiinngg OOxxbbooww CCoommpplleexx, Fort Collins CO: Mechanical and structural engineer for design of 18,500 square feet of new buildings including office building, events center with pilot brewery and commercial kitchen, and supporting structures including guest casitas and tree house meeting room. Project design includes near-zero net energy use and deep foundation on backfilled site. Currently designed to 50% schematics. • AAssppeenn CCeenntteerr ffoorr EEnnvviirroonnmmeennttaall SSttuuddiieess,, Aspen CO: Mechanical engineer for educational facility renovation. The project replaced the existing electric resistance heating system with a new water-source heat pump system that reduced heating energy and cost by two-thirds. CCoonnssuullttiinngg EEnnggiinneeeerrss •• MMeecchhaanniiccaall •• SSttrruuccttuurraall •• EEnneerrggyy CCrreesstteedd BBuuttttee && GGoollddeenn CCoolloorraaddoo •• rreeggiinncc..ccoomm • NNeeww CCaassttllee BBrraanncchh LLiibbrraarryy, New Castle CO: Mechanical engineer for remodel of public library including new heating, cooling, and ventilation systems to achieve LEED-NC v2009 Certification. • MMiiccrroo--DDiissttiilllleerryy PPrroojjeeccttss, Crested Butte CO and Everett, WA: Mechanical engineer for adaptation of gas-fired stills for liquor production in historic building (Montanya Distillers) and industrial building (Bluewater Distilling). Project included ducting for combustion air and flue exhaust, material selection, internal baffling for heat transfer efficiency, building pressurization considerations, and gas safety for 250,000-btu burners. • CCoolloorraaddoo DDiivviissiioonn ooff WWiillddlliiffee RReeggiioonnaall HHeeaaddqquuaarrtteerrss,, Gunnison, CO: Mechanical engineer of record and commissioning agent for new 12,000 ft2 Outdoor Discovery Center, 14,000 ft2 Services Center and Administration, and Hunter Education Building (with indoor shooting range. All three buildings have geo-exchange heating and cooling, high-efficiency ventilation and heating systems. Electrical and plumbing engineering designed by REG sub-consultant. • SSccaarrpp RRiiddggee LLooddggee,, Crested Butte CO: Mechanical and structural engineer for extensive remodeling of historic building into a boutique lodge, including new heating and ventilation systems and replacement of foundation and floor systems. • BBrraassaaddaa RRaanncchh,, Powell Butte OR: Mechanical engineer of record for new resort buildings including 20,000 ft2 Aquatics Center (seven pools/spas and natatorium), 17,000 ft2 Golf Clubhouse and Pro Shop (two outdoor pools/spas), and three other buildings housing hospitality, restaurants and office spaces heated and cooled by pond-loop geo-exchange systems, solar hot water and ventilation controlled by CO2 detection. REG provided DOE-2 energy modeling for LEED certification for four buildings on the campus and commissioning for the Aquatics Center. • HHoossiieerr RReessiiddeennccee,, Crested Butte CO: Mechanical and structural engineer of record, commissioning agent and energy consultant for Net-Zero home. CCoonnssuullttiinngg EEnnggiinneeeerrss •• MMeecchhaanniiccaall •• SSttrruuccttuurraall •• EEnneerrggyy CCrreesstteedd BBuuttttee && GGoollddeenn CCoolloorraaddoo •• rreeggiinncc..ccoomm • GGrroouuppoo CCaalliiddrraa,, Torreon, Coahuila, Mexico: Mechanical engineering for new 1,600m2 (17,000-ft2) office and laboratory facility in extreme hot-dry climate. Office and meeting spaces are cooled with non-mechanized cooling via passive cool towers. • TTwwiinn BBuutttteess DDeevveellooppmmeenntt,, Durango CO: Consulting Engineers for Approval/Entitlement process for 600-acre, 600-unit development for annexation into the City of Durango, including development of energy goals and guidelines, and extensive presentations to City staff, Planning Commission, and Council. • AAllppiinnee BBaannkk,, Colorado: Mechanical engineer of record for several branch banks, and energy auditor for 15 existing facilities. • TThhee LLooddggee aatt AAssppeenn MMoouunnttaaiinn, Aspen Colorado: Mechanical engineering and energy consultant for new 300,000 ft2 hotel complex currently in approval stages. REG is designing a 300-ton hybrid ground-source heat pump system to meet stringent energy and carbon emissions targets for the project. • CCoorrkkiinnss LLooddggee FFaacciilliittyy,, Brazos NM: Mechanical and structural engineer of record and master planning consultant for campus of several resort buildings including distributed water loop heat pump system and net-metered hydroelectric system. Three buildings were designed by Antoine Predock Architect. • GGaatteewwaayy MMoottoorr IInnnn,, Gateway CO: Mechanical and plumbing engineer of record for 40,000 ft2, 42-unit hotel complex with ground-source heating and cooling, swimming pools and hot tubs, and attached recreation center with kitchen facilities • MMoouunnttaaiinn EExxpprreessss BBuuss BBaarrnn, Crested Butte Colorado: Engineering and energy consultant for new 7,000 ft2 bus maintenance and shop facility including solar wash water heating, makeup air system, and radiant heating. • TThhee PPaaiinntt SSttoorree,, Carbondale CO: Mechanical engineer of record for new 17,000ft2 building that includes retail, office, and residential spaces, cooled by night radiant sky exchange and radiant slab delivery. • EEccoovvaa CCoonnssuullttiinngg:: REG has consulted with national energy firm Ecova on a variety of projects, including a Zero-Net-Energy Strategic Planning exercise for San Diego Gas & Electric, energy technology reports for the National Rural Electric Cooperative Association, an investigation of LED reflector lamps for the Institute for Electric Efficiency, and gas dryer efficiency research for the Northwest Energy Efficiency Alliance. • AAssppeenn SSkkiiiinngg CCoommppaannyy PPhhaassee IIII CCoonnddoommiinniiuummss, Snowmass CO: Mechanical engineering consultant for 42-unit project heated indirectly by wastewater effluent from nearby treatment plant. CCoonnssuullttiinngg EEnnggiinneeeerrss •• MMeecchhaanniiccaall •• SSttrruuccttuurraall •• EEnneerrggyy CCrreesstteedd BBuuttttee && GGoollddeenn CCoolloorraaddoo •• rreeggiinncc..ccoomm HHoouurrllyy RRaatteess && DDeettaaiillss:: • Billing. We propose to bill monthly by percent complete and/or hours spent for each discipline. • Rates. 2023 Hourly rates apply for add-service work as requested. Principal Engineer $220/hour Senior Project Engineer $175/hour Project Engineer $150/hour Engineering Drafting $125/hour Due to the long duration of construction projects, our rates are subject to change on an annual basis. • Direct Expenses. Travel time is billable at full rates, unless other arrangements are made. Mileage will be charged at the current IRS Standard Mileage Rate. Expenses (such as shipping, reproduction, and travel) are billed at cost with no markup. Travel costs including hotel and mileage are billed directly; per-diem (meals and other incidentals) billed at $75/day/engineer. RReessuummee || Key Personnel PPrrooffeessssiioonnaall AAffffiilliiaattiioonnss American Society of Heating, Refrigerating, and Air-Conditioning Engineers (ASHRAE) US Green Building Council LEED Accredited Professional Architecture 2030: The 2030 Challenge RReeggiissttrraattiioonnss // CCeerrttiiffiiccaattiioonnss Professional Engineer: Colorado, California, Massachusetts, New York, New Jersey, Texas, Montana, Utah, Vermont and Wyoming Member National Council of Examiners for Engineering and Surveying (NCEES) EEdduuccaattiioonn Bachelor of Science in Glass Engineering Science with Honors: New York State College of Ceramics at Alfred University CCoonnttiinnuuiinngg EEdduuccaattiioonn Frequent instructor and presenter at regional and national conferences Speaker at AIA + 2030: Technical Series HVAC Controls Systems at U of Wisconsin Speaker at International Straw Builder’s Conference Annual attendee of ASHRAE conference LLiivviinngg BBuuiillddiinngg CChhaalllleennggee pprroojjeeccttss:: Community Rebuilds Campus LLEEEEDD rreeggiisstteerreedd pprroojjeeccttss:: RMI Innovation Center (Platinum) Snowmass Golf Clubhouse (Silver) Brasada Ranch Community Center (Gold) Brasada Ranch Farmhouse (Gold) Brasada Ranch Clubhouse (Gold) Doerr-Hosier Conference Center (Gold) Sam’s Knob Smokehouse (Gold) Elk Camp Restaurant (Silver) New Castle Branch Library (Certified) Kiva Lodge (Silver) RealD (LEED CI) Mountain Forge (LEED CI) Zander Residence ((Home Platinum) CCoonnttaacctt IInnffoo hasz@reginc.com www.reginc.com 970.713.0984 426 Belleview, Suite 201 Crested Butte CO 81224 USA JJ.. AAuugguusstt HHaasszz PPEE,, PPrreessiiddeenntt aanndd PPrriinncciippaall August has worked tirelessly to reduce the overall impact of the built environment. Working across the S+MEP disciplines allows August to view buildings holistically and to understand the impacts of buildings from conception through construction, occupancy and end of life cycle. In addition to managing the day-to-day operations of REG, he oversees a wide variety of work for REG including: mechanical, electrical and plumbing system design, structural engineering, energy auditing, commissioning for new and existing buildings, building simulation, alternative electrical and mechanical systems options, passive heating and cooling strategies, radiant cooling, code consulting, forensics engineering, electrification projects, heat pump system design and solar energy analysis. Led the MEP system design for a number of Colorado’s first NZE all-electric affordable housing projects in Telluride, Basalt, Breckenridge, and Dillon. August’s engineering mastery, creative attitude, and innate sense for completing complex projects on time and budget have allowed him to compile an impressive track record at REG over the course of the last 20+ years. Prior to joining REG, his past experience includes fundamental research into glass and ceramic materials, water pump design, and water and wastewater plant operation. August also manages staffing, project scheduling and budgeting, risk management and multi-discipline project delivery. SSeelleecctteedd PPrroojjeeccttss RRoocckkyy MMoouunnttaaiinn IInnssttiittuuttee IInnnnoovvaattiioonn CCeenntteerr,, BBaassaalltt CCOO:: Commissioning Engineer for new headquarters for RMI. Provided MEP systems design review from conceptual through final systems testing. LEED-NC v2009 Platinum. RReenneewwaabbllee EEnneerrggyy MMiittiiggaattiioonn PPrrooggrraamm ((RREEMMPP aakkaa EExxtteerriioorr EEnneerrggyy OOffffsseett PPrrooggrraamm EEEEOOPP)):: Provided calculations and technical support for a variety of municipalities including: City of Aspen, Pitkin County, Summit County, Eagle County, Town of Telluride, San Miguel County, Town of Crested Butte, and City of Basalt. Supported staff as well as joined various public groups to provide technical assistance to help the public and elected officials make informed decisions. CCoolloorraaddoo DDiivviissiioonn ooff WWiillddlliiffee RReeggiioonnaall HHeeaaddqquuaarrtteerrss,, GGuunnnniissoonn,, CCOO:: Mechanical engineering of record and commissioning agent for new 12,000 ft2 Outdoor Discovery Center, 14,000 ft2 Services Center and Administration, and Hunter Education Building (with indoor shooting range. All three buildings have geo-exchange heating and cooling, high-efficiency ventilation and heating systems. KKiittttiittiiaann HHiillll,, IIssllaanndd ooff SStt.. KKiittttss,, SStt.. KKiittttss && NNeevviiss:: A luxury resort focused on sustainability. Project includes 84 cottages, 80+ villas, multiple restaurants, 150+ pools, multi-use commercial zone and a 75+ unit hotel. REG provided complete MEP engineering for the majority of buildings, select structural engineering and engineering of the electrical infrastructure. AAssppeenn SSkkiiiinngg CCoommppaannyy AAuuddiittss aanndd EEnnggiinneeeerriinngg,, AAssppeenn CCOO:: Provided a wide-variety of building energy audits, efficiency recommendations and detailed design for upgrades, retrofits, renovations and new buildings for facilities ranging in size from 400ft2 to 100,000ft2 spanning nearly 20 years. KKooii RReessoorrtt,, IIssllaanndd ooff SStt.. KKiittttss,, SStt.. KKiittttss && NNeevviiss:: Providing MEP services coordination, peer review and commissioning for the luxury, 442 room hotel with dining, spa, gym, and extensive pools. Challenges include coordinating with design team spread across the globe and working with local infrastructure availability. SSuunnnnyyssiiddee AAffffoorrddaabbllee HHoouussiinngg,, TToowwnn ooff TTeelllluurriiddee CCOO:: Structural, Mechanical, Electrical and Plumbing Engineer of record for 30 units of affordable housing which are estimated to achieve an annual Net Zero Energy goal. This project includes in a mix of tiny homes, apartments and townhomes covering 40,000ft2 and uses a variety of ultra efficient yet affordable strategies to achieve aggressive energy goals. NNeeww CCaassttllee BBrraanncchh LLiibbrraarryy,, NNeeww CCaassttllee CCOO:: Mechanical engineering for remodel of public library including new heating, cooling and ventilation systems to achieve LEED-NC v2009 Certification. GGrroouuppoo CCaalliiddrraa,, TToorrrreeoonn,, CCooaahhuuiillaa,, MMeexxiiccoo:: Mechanical engineering for new 1,600m2 (17,000-ft2) office and laboratory facility in extreme hot- dry climate. Office and meeting spaces are cooled with non-mechanized cooling via passive cool towers. RReessuummee || Key Personnel DDooeerrrr--HHoossiieerr CCoonnffeerreennccee CCeenntteerr,, AAssppeenn IInnssttiittuuttee,, AAssppeenn CCOO:: Mechanical engineering and commissioning agent for new 20,000-ft2 conference facility with pond-loop geo-exchange heating and cooling, strict noise criteria, and difficult site constraints. GGuunnnniissoonn PPuubblliicc SSaaffeettyy FFaacciilliittyy aanndd PPuubblliicc WWoorrkkss,, GGuunnnniissoonn,, CCOO:: Commissioning agent for approx. 50,000 ft2 public safety facility and 17,000 ft2 public works building. These buildings include diverse uses of office spaces, vehicle maintenance facility, jail facility, commercial kitchen, requiring a blend of air handling systems and controls challenges. BBrraassaaddaa RRaanncchh,, PPoowweellll BBuuttttee OORR:: Mechanical engineering and commissioning for new resort buildings including 20,000-ft2 Aquatics Center (seven pools/spas and natatorium), 17,000-ft2 Golf Clubhouse and Pro Shop (two outdoor pools/spas), and three other buildings housing hospitality, restaurants and office spaces heated and cooled by pond-loop geo-exchange systems, solar hot water and ventilation controlled by CO2 detection. Commissioning of the Aquatics Center. REG also provided DOE-2 energy modeling for LEED certification for four buildings on the campus. BBuurrlliinnggaammee PPhhaassee IIII AAffffoorrddaabbllee HHoouussiinngg,, AAssppeenn,, CCOO:: Mechanical Engineer of record for 162-unit workforce housing project. The project was one of the first in the area to use the AIA Integrated Project Delivery (IPD) process, which involves continuous collaboration between the design, estimating, and construction teams. The design also used Building Information Modeling (BIM) with 3-D collision detection to avoid construction conflicts. Individual housing units each have their own heat-recovery ventilators, and condensing DHW water heaters provide all space heating. CCoolloorraaddoo RRoocckkyy MMoouunnttaaiinn SScchhooooll NNoorrtthh aanndd SSoouutthh DDoorrmmiittoorriieess,, CCaarrbboonnddaallee CCOO:: Provided mechanical and commissioning engineering for new dormitory facilities. Systems incorporated solar thermal for domestic hot water and space heating. CCOOMMPPAASSSS SScchhooooll,, AAssppeenn CCOO:: Conducted audits of all existing buildings to asses energy systems condition, resulting in detailed recommendations to aid in future master planning as well as retrofit system narratives for inclusion in BEST grant applications. GGuunnnniissoonn CCoouunnttyy CCoouurrtthhoouussee,, GGuunnnniissoonn,, CCoolloorraaddoo Commissioning agent for approx. 45,000 ft2 county courthouse including hearing rooms, county offices and meeting spaces. PPaaeeppcckkee CCeenntteerr AAuuddiittoorriiuumm,, AAssppeenn IInnssttiittuuttee,, AAssppeenn CCOO Mechanical and structural engineering and commissioning agent for extensive remodel and expansion of 17,000-ft2 performance, library, gallery and office facility with pond-loop geo-exchange heating and cooling, strict noise criteria, and difficult site constraints. CCaarrbboonnddaallee CCoommmmuunniittyy CCeenntteerr,, CCaarrbboonnddaallee CCOO Mechanical and commissioning engineering for major renovation of 44,000-ft2 former school complex into new center for local non-profits, including extensive modeling and design work to develop low-energy systems. SSnnoowwmmaassss VViillllaaggee RReeccrreeaattiioonn FFaacciilliittyy,, SSnnoowwmmaassss VViillllaaggee CCOO:: Mechanical and structural engineering for new 8,000-ft2 facility including five (outdoor) swimming pools/spas, fitness room, and locker rooms. Mechanical features include 33-panel active solar system and heat pump air conditioning that rejects heat to the pool systems. SSnnoowwmmaassss VViillllaaggee TToowwnn HHaallll,, SSnnoowwmmaassss VViillllaaggee CCOO:: Mechanical engineer of record for new 23,000 ft2 facility including police station, council chambers, and ventilated garage. Mechanical features include modulating condensing boilers and CO2-controlled ventilation. CCoonnssuullttiinngg EEnnggiinneeeerrss •• MMeecchhaanniiccaall •• SSttrruuccttuurraall •• EEnneerrggyy CCrreesstteedd BBuuttttee && GGoollddeenn CCoolloorraaddoo •• rreeggiinncc..ccoomm Todd Kennedy CCY Architects tkennedy@ccyarchitects.com 970.948.6054 2023.12.13 Re: Armory M-E-P Engineering Todd: Thank you for requesting a proposal from REG for Mechanical, Electrical and Plumbing Engineering services for the Armory Hall project in Aspen, Colorado. To prepare this proposal we discussed the project requirements with you and have reviewed the RFP provided by the City of Aspen as well as relying on our experience engineering within the building previously. REG Qualifications Our experience spans remote back country huts, complicated historic renovations, municipal buildings, performing spaces, 5-star island resorts, downtown projects with zero lot lines and modern luxury residences. We have the experience and skills to bring a highly coordinated project from design to completion. Previously REG has provided mechanical engineering for the council space with the currently Armory Hall, as well as having provided an energy audit of the project along with other buildings in the City of Aspen portfolio. The City of Aspen has worked closely with REG during our MEP engineering of the Wheeler Opera House remodel for all new HVAC systems throughout and remodeling of the offices and restaurant spaces. We have worked closely with Town Staff in a variety of consulting roles over the last twenty years, most recently as technical advisor for energy code updates and to provide a completely overhauled REMP calculator tool to be adopted into the building code process. Our experience working in Aspen is extensive and includes popular dining and catering projects at the Whitehouse, Ajax Tavern, The Little Nell, Limelight Hotel, Aspen Institute Reception Building, Doerr Hosier Center, and Matsuhisa. CCoonnssuullttiinngg EEnnggiinneeeerrss •• MMeecchhaanniiccaall •• SSttrruuccttuurraall •• EEnneerrggyy CCrreesstteedd BBuuttttee && GGoollddeenn CCoolloorraaddoo •• rreeggiinncc..ccoomm We live and breathe energy efficiency, and specialize in designing mechanical and structural systems to achieve aggressive energy goals. In addition to nuts-and-bolts design work, we do computerized building simulation—often with our own tools developed in-house to get more accurate results than commercially available tools. We are also active in fieldwork such as commissioning, re- commissioning, energy auditing, and general troubleshooting to make buildings run better. Our track record renovating historic buildings in Aspen to create state-of-the-art high-performance buildings will provide this team with the experience to achieve the City of Aspen’s aggressive energy goals. REG Process At REG we take a wholistic approach to engineering buildings. Prior to designing a system, we review the goals of the project from both the Owner’s and Architect’s perspective. Armed with this information, we review the requirements for structural and MEP systems in detail prior to selecting building systems. This gives us the opportunity to engineer systems that work harmoniously while maintaining the goals of the Ownership and Architectural Team. Moving forward, our project engineers all work in the same Revit file, collaborating in real-time between M- E-P disciplines as the 3-dimensional model of the building evolves. REG Philosophy We regard this project as an opportunity to create spaces of lasting beauty and elegant functionality. Our approach is to solve problems early in the design phase through intelligent coordination with the design team. Rather than using overwhelming force, we depend on a combination of accurate calculations and practical experience to size systems to do their job. We strive for simplicity and efficiency in everything we design, and place a premium on engineering excellence, progressive thinking, clear communication, and a team approach. Mechanical and structural systems are technically “back of house” requirements, but that doesn’t mean they can’t be beautiful in their execution. Project Description Refer to the RFP dated 20236.11.20. CCoonnssuullttiinngg EEnnggiinneeeerrss •• MMeecchhaanniiccaall •• SSttrruuccttuurraall •• EEnneerrggyy CCrreesstteedd BBuuttttee && GGoollddeenn CCoolloorraaddoo •• rreeggiinncc..ccoomm Scopes of Work: General (applies to all design disciplines) • Participate in design meetings as required. We anticipate up to 5 in-person design meetings Aspen, 3 in-person meetings with HPC and Council, and others by teleconference as often needed. • Site visit to review existing conditions as a start to the SD process (and in connection with a SD design kick off meeting). • Submittals of up to four plan sets, (SD, DD, Permit, CD) responding to redline comments as necessary. • Internal coordination between mechanical, electrical, and plumbing scopes. • All REG drafting is done in a single Revit model. We anticipate a regular file share and transfer with the architectural model. • All 3D drawings will be available to the contracting team as a 3D pdf file or web enabled Revit model using A360. • Project specifications in Master Spec CSI format of discipline specific specification sections for 100% DD and CD submittals or on plans. • The proposed budget is approx. $17M for construction costs. • This scope of work references the Project Description above. Changes to the size, budget and/or configuration of the referenced building size and/or building systems may require Additional Services. • Construction Assistance and Bidding/Negotiation (Billed hourly, estimate available after CD design is complete) o Revisions to and questions regarding our design after 100% CD plans are released. o Bidding and negotiation questions. o Shop drawing review. o Submittal review. o MEP construction observation site visits as requested. Mechanical Engineering • Early systems analysis for alternative approaches include air-source and ground-source heat pumps, solar thermal and electric systems, and other alternative ideas that may be applicable. This analysis will be based upon our experience and working closely with the Sustainability / Energy Modeling Consultant. We anticipate significant back and forth with this Consultant. • Mechanical plans including: heating, cooling, ventilation, snowmelt system design (if needed), DHW heating, details and schematics as necessary. • Commercial kitchen ventilation system design. • Division 23 specifications. • Division 21 Fire Suppression specifications. FP system design will be by Others. • Permit documentation for mechanical design, including CREMP documentation and coordination with the PV system designer and Landscape Architect. Snowmelt plan for CREMP documentation provided by Others. • The mechanical and lighting portions of COMCheck, if required. We have budgeted for up to one COMCheck submittal. Additional revisions and/or submittals may require additional services. COMCheck for the building envelope to be provided by others. CCoonnssuullttiinngg EEnnggiinneeeerrss •• MMeecchhaanniiccaall •• SSttrruuccttuurraall •• EEnneerrggyy CCrreesstteedd BBuuttttee && GGoollddeenn CCoolloorraaddoo •• rreeggiinncc..ccoomm Electrical Engineering • Electrical plans including single-line diagrams, panel schedules, circuit diagrams, utility outlets, connections for alternative energy sources, and other electrical equipment, and details as necessary. • Transformer coordination with local utility. • Backup power systems engineering. • Coordination with PV systems design-build installer. Detailed PV design provided by Design- Build installer. • Lighting system documentation and permit level submittal including: COMCheck compliance documentation, emergency/egress lighting plans and final lighting plans. Lighting designer to provide a DD level set of plans including: RCP showing all fixture specifications and location, switching and controls locations and intent, and complete fixture schedule. This information will be provided to REG in .dwg or .rvt format. We have not budgeted for multiple rounds of revisions to lighting fixture selection or location. The intent is take the DD level of plans which are provided and move that approach linearly to a CD level of plan set. • Tel/data/TV rough-in locations will be shown on REG power plans. All locations will be identified by the Architect or Owner and clearly communicated to REG via redlines on a pdf or marked up cad file (narrative general descriptions will not be sufficient). Plumbing Engineering • Plumbing plans including: o Potable water system (cold water, hot water) o Sanitary sewer system (waste and vent) o Gas lines routing (if required). o Roof drains and deck drains that are routed internally to the buildings. o For systems designed above: service sizing, fixture locations, and fixture schedules. Scope Exclusions The following are specifically excluded from the scope of work under our fees: • Significant design changes requiring redesign. • Fire protection system design. (We will coordinate with the F/P system designer or installer.) • Fireplace venting design, and make-up air system design beyond scope detailed above. • Humidification design. • All low voltage wiring design (audio/visual, telephone, data, security, and fire) beyond locating outlets. • Site and foundation drainage systems. • Documentation or design for LEED, LBC or other sustainability programs. • The proposed addition to the building. • Guarantees or warranties, by a site observation or inspection report from REG, that construction was completed per our plans. • Building systems commissioning. • For most of these exclusions, we may provide additional services on an hourly or flat-fee basis as necessary. CCoonnssuullttiinngg EEnnggiinneeeerrss •• MMeecchhaanniiccaall •• SSttrruuccttuurraall •• EEnneerrggyy CCrreesstteedd BBuuttttee && GGoollddeenn CCoolloorraaddoo •• rreeggiinncc..ccoomm Fees: See provided spreadsheet for fees. Details • Billing. We propose to bill monthly by percent complete and/or hours spent for each discipline. Due to the long duration of construction projects, our rates are subject to change on an annual basis. See provided spreadsheet for current rates as well as rates projected through 2028. • Direct Expenses. Travel time is billable at full rates, unless other arrangements are made. Mileage will be charged at the current IRS Standard Mileage Rate. Expenses (such as shipping, reproduction, and travel) are billed at cost with no markup. Travel costs including hotel and mileage are billed directly; per-diem (meals and other incidentals) billed at $75/day/engineer. • Work Stoppage. If REG is directed to stop work once we have started our engineering services for more than 3 weeks, additional services may be required to re-engage on the project. We have substantial experience in this type of project, and are confident that we can meet the project requirements. Our firm emphasizes engineering excellence, progressive thinking, and clear communication. Please feel free to call if you have any questions about REG’s proposal. Sincerely, August Hasz, P.E. Dodson Harper, P.E., S.E. Principal Engineer Principal Engineer • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • Value Add Roaring Fork Engineering can bring value to the project due to a deep understanding of the City of Aspen standards and familiarity with the processes. RFE has completed several major City projects in the last 5 years, from land use through permitting and completion. We are currently working on the Lumberyard Project for City’s Assets and are familiar with the City staff to collaborate with. As part of the City Offices Project, RFE has reviewed the site, gaining a high-level under- standing of the challenges of the Armory. Creative ways to bring a Historic Building struc- ture into ADA compliance and meet the URMP are items we have extensive experience with. SCOPE: Schematic Design: RFE will participate in the initial design meeting and spend time understanding the site and the constraints. We will also meet with the review department to discuss issues related to making the site code compliant. Using this information, we can produce a schematic level site design for this phase. Land Use Application: RFE will provide civil engineering documents meeting Title 26 of the City of Aspen Land Use Requirements. This will include drawings, an engineering, and drainage report. #970.340.4130 592 CO-133 Carbondale, CO 81623 10 YEAR ANNIVERSARY We build lasting infrastructures and cultivate deep relationships within our community. Roaring Fork Engineering, Inc. (RFE) is a Civil Engineering firm located in Carbondale, Colorado. Established in 2012, RFE offers services in utility capital improvement planning, design (drainage, land development, transportation, water and wastewater treatment and conveyance), and construction management. RFE’s management team have over 50 years of combined experience in planning, design, and construction experience in the Roaring Fork Valley and the Western Slope. We are currently the on call engineer for Carbondale, Basalt Sanitation District and Brush Creek Metro and have a deep understanding of municipal design and contracting practices in the region. RFE thinks differently about civil engineering in rural Colorado. RFE’s mindset is to provide innovative, sustainable solutions that protect and enhance the natural world while bringing a positive difference to the people and communities where we live, work, and play. We work smarter, faster, and are forward thinking. RFE believes our clients are our valued partners and our client’s goals, business, and future are paramount in our designs and our success. RFE’s professional client relationships are our greatest assets. We gain a significant portion of projects from repeat clients due to our responsiveness, quality of work, and personable relationships with those with whom we work with. RFE will always strive to provide premier value, design, and engineering services to our clients. We will also coordinate with City Engineering to determine the best way to make the current building comply with the Urban Runoff Management Plan (URMP). Design Development: RFE will work with the design team to produce a DD-level set of documents to be used for the pricing of the project. Land Use Recordation: RFE will incorporate the comments and changes from the land use review into the set of documents that will be recorded as the Planned Development set. Pitkin County Ambulance Facility Civil engineering for a new ambulance facility and surrounding infrastructure in Aspen, CO. The infrastructure upgrade included several components, including: the relocation of utilities, sewer main extension, drainage and capacity studies. RFE’s design team was able to prove though extensive hydraulic calculations that the existing Hospital infrastructure had capacity for the new building and parking lot expansion. Project Details • Extension of sewer main • Relocation of fiber, gas and electric lines • Drainage study & extensive hydraulic calculations • Stakeholder alignment for bus rerouting Aspen City Offices - City of Aspen Infrastructure for Rio Grande Place, City Offices, and Pitkin County office building, jail, and courthouse. RFE commenced design work on the new Aspen City Office at Rio Grande Place, completing the land use application and attending public meetings to address civil engineering issues. The project was then phased into the infrastructure at Rio Grande Place and the actual building site. In addition to extensive civil engineering work, RFE inspected, recorded, and documented the construction to ensure the contractor was following City of Aspen and Aspen Consolidated Sanitation District’s Construction Standards. Project Details • Complex drain system design • Hydraulic modeling to size inlets and pipes • Coordination of affected utilities • Main waterline replacement • Major sewer trunk line upgrade • Relocation of community vaults • Electrical equipment replacement 10 YEAR ANNIVERSARY We build lasting infrastructures and cultivate deep relationships within our community. #970.340.4130 592 CO-133 Carbondale, CO 81623 #970.340.4130 592 CO-133 Carbondale, CO 81623 Richard B. Goulding, P.E. Civil Engineer, Principal in Charge Richard Goulding has lived and worked as a civil engineer in the Roaring Fork Valley for 23 years and founded RFE in 2012. In addition to a broad base of engineering knowledge and expertise, Richard brings with him a solid reputation in the area and established relationships within the Roaring Fork Valley community. In his role as the Founder and a Principal at RFE he has led the design of multiple infrastructure projects for the City of Aspen Engineering & Water Departments, Pitkin County, the Town of Carbondale, Aspen Consolidated Sanitation District, Brush Creek Metropolitan District, and the Aspen Skiing Company. He oversaw the construction of many of these projects and provided inspection oversight on several projects designed by other engineers. In addition to his RFE work, Richard has five years of experience with the City of Aspen Engineering Department and seven years at one of the largest engineering firms on the Western Slope. During his career in the Roaring Fork Valley, Richard has formed excellent professional and personal relationships with colleagues at municipal and state government agencies. He also maintains strong working relationships with local utility providers. Richard’s areas of expertise include utility, drainage design, site design and construction administration. Richard is currently the District Engineer for the Basalt Sanitation District and Brush Creek Metro District. In addition, he performs on-call Engineering services for the Town of Carbondale. UTILITY DESIGN AND PLANNING Richard designed several significant utility projects. He has designed water treatment facilities, wastewater plants and laid out complex water and sewer systems to comply with both local and state standards. He is very familiar the AWWA and CDPHE standards, pressure testing, and flushing procedures. He also completed complex phasing plans for municipal clients. Example projects include: Rio Grande Place infrastructure Basalt Vista infrastructure including water, sewer, and dry utilities. Brush Creek Metro District capital improvement and metering project Aspen Pedestrian Mall utility planning. Rubey Subdivision access utility, and irrigation design/masterplan. Roaring Fork Road waterline. Lazy Chair Road and utility corridor. Mill Street sanitary sewer. Red Mountain Road/ Hunter Creek waterline replacement. DRAINAGE DESIGN Richard has completed a number a large drainage designs for public and private clients developing subdivisions and large sites. Most of these are within resort communities. He has a thorough understanding of Urban Drainage Design Manuals and, since starting RFE, many of his projects have been focused on low impact drainage designs. Richard has also participated in the writing of drainage code for municipalities and regularly reviews projects for the Town of Carbondale. Examples of his work include. Basalt Vista drainage and debris flow Education Civil and Environmental Engineering, University College Cork, 1999 Master of Business Administration, University of Wyoming, 2013 Registration Professional Engineer: Colorado, 2005 Richard B. Goulding, P.E. Rio Grande Place master drainage plan Spring Valley Phase 1&2 drainage design Lumberyard storm water management CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT Richard has taken a construction manager role on a number of his design projects. He has experience with EJCDC documents and conflict resolution in conformance with contract, He also has knowledge of the rules and regulations regarding projects that receive funding with Davis Bacon wage requirements. He has provided input to control costs and worked with contractors to value engineer projects. He also led the inspections for several Valley infrastructure projects. These include: Lumberyard drainage master plan One Aspen inspections Main Street Water inspections Town of Carbondale Market Place inspections Aspen City Offices and Rio Grande Place Basalt Vista Aspen Valley Polo Fields Danny C. Stewart, P.E. Civil Engineer, Project Manager Danny Stewart grew up on the Western Slope of Colorado and has been practicing as a consulting engineer in the Roaring Fork Valley for over 16 years. He has a wide range of design and project management experience for a variety of civil discipline engineering projects. Danny’s experience includes design and project management for municipal, state, county, and federal infrastructure projects, as well as on private and commercial development projects. Danny also is experienced in construction administration as well as a field engineering inspector. SITE DEVELOPMENT Danny provides site and infrastructure design for a variety of private development projects. Different development projects include subdivisions utilizing street, grading, drainage and utility design. He designed single housing projects in Aspen and Pitkin County, many of which included OWTS designs and storm water treatment along with close involvement with architects, property managers and landscape architects. Example projects include: The Tree Farm Aspen City Offices Aspen Affordable Housing Basalt Vista - Habitat for Humanity Maroon Creek Club Pool and Recreation Improvements. UTILITY DESIGN Danny has designed many underground utilities for his development and road and street projects. He has also designed stand-alone utility projects including sewer lines, water mains and high-pressure gas lines. Example projects include: Rio Grande/Founders Place water and sewer main improvements The Tree Farm infrastructure projects Castle Creek water main improvements Midland Avenue water main improvements HYDRAULIC AND DRAINAGE DESIGN Danny has experience with hydraulic design using modeling programs like HEC-RAS, HECHMS, and FLO 2D. He has worked on FEMA studies including flood plain modeling and FEMA map revisions. He has experience in dam break modeling and hydrology studies for jurisdictional and non-jurisdictional dams. He used this experience for a hydraulic study and hazard classification report for Meridian Lake Park Dam near Crested Butte. Much of his hydraulic and drainage design is part of road and bridge projects to model 100- and 500-year floods to set bridge elevations and design large drainage structures to mitigate storm water runoff and debris flows. Danny has also provided engineer design for irrigation ditch diversion structures. Projects include: Basalt Vista Debris Flow Mitigation Pond Slate Creek Debris Flow Study 1140 Black Birch LOMR Meridian Lake Park Dam (Crested Butte) Atkinson Ditch diversion structure (Four Mile Creek) Education B.S. University of Wyoming Civil Engineering, 2007 Registration Professional Engineer: Colorado, 2012 Wyoming, 2022 Danny C. Stewart, P.E. Civil Engineer, Principal ROAD, TRAIL, AND STREET DESIGN As a consulting engineer, Danny has designed and managed many transportation infrastructure projects. Experience includes road design for The City of Aspen and the Town of Carbondale, and Mesa, Garfield, and Eagle counties. Projects include Rio Grande Place in Aspen, 8th Street and Snowmass Drive in Carbondale, 45.5 road and highway 330 in Mesa County, county road 300, 100, 109, and 126 improvement projects in Garfield County and Cedar Drive and Catamount Bridge improvements in Eagle County. These projects incorporated many engineering disciplines other than road design such as bridge design, structural concrete, gravity and MSE retaining walls, hydraulic and drainage design, and traffic studies. Danny has designed bike and multi-use trails, most involving pedestrian bridges and retaining walls. Design and management of trail projects include Gore Valley Trail in Vail, Kodiak Lake Trail in Eagle County, LOVA Trail in South Canyon, ECO trails in Dotsero and Eagle to Walcott segment, West Midland and 14th Street multi-use paths in Glenwood Springs and Pitkin County Open Space trails. Most of these projects included sidewalk and storm sewer design and involved private property improvements and coordination to work in CDOT right-of-way. Many of the above projects involved federal funding from DOLA, GOCO, and FMLD or where CDOT funded local agency projects. CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT Danny has provided construction support and inspection for many of his own projects and as a junior engineer on many other designers’ projects. He is familiar with daily inspection reports including CDOT inspection forms. He understands traffic control MUTCD regulations and is familiar with construction safety standards. Danny’s past construction experience prior to his engineering career has provided unique knowledge he uses as a construction manager. His projects include: Rio Grande Place Utilities One Aspen Inspections RFTA - West Glenwood Park and Ride Design Workshop is an international design studio, integrating landscape architecture, urban design, planning and strategic services. Whether designing a restorative private garden, developing the vision for a contemporary park or reimagining an underperforming downtown center, we go beyond the project itself to create places of timeless beauty and meaningful connections. We are a community of designers, planners and strategists, who love what we do. We design for people - not just today but for future generations. Our performance-based approach yields measurable results and projects that stand the test of time. In other words, we don’t just hope for sustainable projects; we rely on our process to deliver them. We call this process DW Legacy Design®. For over 50 years, “workshop” remains a hallmark of our firm, supporting collaboration and experimentation where clients and designers solve problems together. Design Workshop is dedicated to creating Legacy projects for our clients, society and the well-being of our planet. Our Legacy DW Legacy Design® represents our commitment to design projects that outlast us and contribute to a healthier world. Our methodology ensures every project has a balance between environmental sensitivity, community connection, artistry and economic viability. With this approach, our projects reflect the critical issues facing the built environment and deliver measurable benefits. It is the foundation of the firm’s workshop culture and the defining process of our practice. Environment We are stewards of the environment and champions for a sustainable future. Community An inclusive engagement process is critical to (re) building the social fabric of the community. Economics Projects must be financially sustainable to last generations. We need to consider market reality and return on investment. Art Art is an integral part of the human experience; it challenges assumptions and provokes thought while revealing beauty and meaning. 535 + DESIGN + PLANNING AWARDS 56 COMMUNITY ENGAGEMENT AWARDS DW Legacy Design® 100 % Employee Owned DW Studios Aspen Austin Chicago Denver Houston Lake Tahoe Los Angeles Raleigh DW Foundation We are dedicated to giving back to our communities. We have established the DW Foundation, which offers time and materials to select community projects. 54 Year History Working in the Mountain West Design Workshop Design Workshop Education Harvard Graduate School of Design, Advanced Management Development Program in Real Estate Bachelor of Landscape Architecture, Oklahoma State University Licensure and Certifications Professional Landscape Architect: CO LEED® Accredited Professional Building Design and Construction American Institute of Certified Planners (AICP) Professional Affiliations American Planning Association (APA) Urban Land Institute (ULI) Urban Land Institute (ULI) Colorado Resort Entertainment Tourism and Lesisure (RETL), Product Council Board Member Design WEEK Coordinator Recent Awards and Honors ULI Colorado Impact Awards, Rising Star Nomination Landscape Architecture Medal of Excellence, Design Week Darla Callaway PLA, AICP, LEED® AP PRINCIPAL LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT A landscape architect and planner with over 12 years of experience, Darla has led some of DW’s most complex urban redevelopment projects, mountain resort master plans, site design, community visioning plans and public facilitation. No matter the scale, Darla’s accomplishments are centered on responsible land use and creating lasting places. Darla is an active member of Colorado’s ULI Resort, Entertainment, Tourism and Leisure Product Council and has been a research contributor for the Landscape Architecture Foundation, evaluating the environmental and economic performance of landscape architecture projects in the U.S. and internationally. Selected Project Experience Aspen Police Station and Affordable Housing – Aspen, CO Beginning with property due diligence during the Aspen Facilities Master Plan, Darla provided landscape architecture services for all outdoor spaces of the new police station and employee housing building, construction documents and construction observation through the implementation phase. Aspen City Offices – Aspen, CO Darla served as the Principal Landscape Architect on the design and planning for Aspen’s new City Hall and Offices. Design Workshop provided landscape architecture services for all outdoor spaces and completed construction documents. Construction was completed in 2023. Galena Plaza – Aspen, CO Darla served as the Principal-in-Charge on this project to reconsider Galena Plaza’s public space programming. Design Workshop created and presented conceptual design alternatives and conducted stakeholder engagement interviews to inform their plan. Downtown Historic Pedestrian Malls Master Plan – Aspen, CO The Aspen Pedestrian Malls are at a critical moment in time with failing infrastructure threating their legacy. After securing an approved master plan, Darla led a complex renovation design of the Pedestrian Malls, ensuring historical integrity is maintained, innovative and sustainable infrastructure are implemented and the Malls are memorable for Aspen’s locals and visitors. 5 Project Team Education Master of City and Regional Planning, Ohio State University Bachelor of Political Science, University of Colorado Licensure and Certifications American Institute of Certified Planners (AICP) Lean Six Sigma Green Belt Professional Affiliations American Planning Association (APA) Legislative and Policy Committee Pitkin County Growth Advisory Committee YEP! Youth Engagement Planning Board Member Recent Awards and Honors STaR Award for Comprehensive Planning, Telluride 2022 Community Vision and Action Plan APA Colorado Merit Award in Community Engagement, 2022 Telluride Community Vision and Action Plan APA Colorado Honor Award, Creation of Updated Commercial Design Jessica Garrow AICP PRINICPAL PLANNER & COMMUNITY ENGAGEMENT SPECIALIST Jessica is a community development professional with nearly twenty years of experience and a proven track record of successful planning implementation and community engagement. She has effectively managed significant and complex projects and budgets, worked to craft innovative planning policies, and promoted sustainable comprehensive planning. Prior to Design Workshop, Jessica worked as a land use planner and Community Development Director for the City of Aspen. During that time she worked on economic development plans, award winning and broad community engagement strategies, the Comprehensive Plan and a number of overhauls to the Land Use Code. Select Project Experience Amory Hall Market Study – Aspen, CO Jessica and the Design Workshop team worked with the City of Aspen as they explored new uses for the Aspen Armory Hall. This included extensive stakeholder interviews, situational analysis and market feasibility analysis and reporting. City of Aspen Development Moratorium Support – Aspen, CO Jessica led efforts with the City of Aspen as they explored code and policy amendments related to residential development, including updates to the Growth Management Quota System. This included extensive community engagement meetings, surveys, focus group meetings, and data analysis. Telluride 2022 Community Vision and Action Plan – Telluride, CO Jessica worked with the Town of Telluride to establish a Vision and Action Plan that reflects the community’s goals. The process focused on creating a shared vision through facilitation and robust community engagement. Mesa County Strategic Plan – Mesa County, CO Jessica supported efforts to create an updated Strategic Plan for Mesa County. The Plan was the result of a series of focused facilitated sessions and created consensus between departments that had previously worked in silos. Land Use Application Processing – Multiple Locations Jessica provides land use application services to private clients on the western slope. This work includes working with staff, completing land use applications, and appearing before boards and commissions. 4 Project Team Design Workshop6 Project Team Ashley Hejtmanek PLA, AICP, LEED® GA HISTORIC PRESERVATIONIST Ashley is a project manager and associate with Design Workshop. Her experiences in the disciplines of planning, community engagement, urban design, site planning, and historic preservation are broad and far-reaching over her 15 year tenure with the firm. Her professional interests include the interactions between culture and the land and creating lasting impressions that benefit the good of the public and environment. Ashley has a certificate in preservation planning from the University of Virginia with a focus on cultural landscapes. Selected Project Experience Old Western State Hospital – Staunton, VA Ashley prepared a cultural landscape report for the Garden Club of Virginia on the Old Western State Hospital campus in Staunton, Virgina. As the grounds were engaging in private redevelopment, the GCV wanted to assure that the tangible elements of the landscape and the and the hospital’s story were recorded in perpetuity. This experience lead to a deep study of early mental hospital sites in the East and the meaning that their remnant landscapes portray. Story Mill Community Park – Bozeman, MT A Parks for People project for the Trust for Public Land, Design Workshop lead a multi-disciplinary team through the master plan and implementation of a 60-acre regional park in the heart of Bozeman. Surrounded by the rich historic and natural landscape of the city, the park hosts everything from a nature sanctuary to an adventure playground for all ages. Port Gamble – Puget Sound, WA Port Gamble is one of the longest surviving company towns in the United States. Designated a National Historic Landmark District, the town’s future has been in flux since the mills closed in 1995 and as historic resources have gradually diminished. Recognizing a need to preserve the remaining intact townsite as more than a living history museum, Pope Resources engaged with Design Workshop to provide a framework for a resilient future. Education Master of Urban and Environmental Planning with Historic Preservation Planning Concentration, University of Virginia Bachelor of Arts in Landscape Architecture, Pennsylvania State University Licensure and Certifications Professional Landscape Architect: CO American Institute of Certified Planners (AICP) LEED® Green Associate Certified Construction Documents Technologist (CSI) Professional Affiliations American Planning Association (APA) National Recreation and Park Association Carbondale Parks and Recreation Commission Education Bachelor of Landscape Architecture, Louisiana State University Licensure and Certifications Professional Landscape Architect: CO Specialist in Ornamental Horticulture; Royal Botanic Gardens at Kew Professional Affiliations American Society of Landscape Architects (ASLA) The Morton Arboretum Max Guzzetta PLA PROJECT MANAGER, PROJECT LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT Max is a project manager and associate in Design Workshop’s Aspen Office. Max has managed multiple large-scale residential and mixed-use projects in the Roaring Fork Valley and across the mountain west from conceptual design through construction observation. His involvement in many projects within Pitkin County have solidified a deep understanding of the land use application process within both the City of Aspen and Pitkin County. As a Landscape Architect Max’s passion in the field is deeply rooted in place making and how effective site design can serve as a bridge between the native landscape and culture. Select Project Experience River Park Townhomes – Aspen, CO Max served as the project manager for this multifamily residential complex within the City of Aspen. The project focused on the redesign of the communities green roof garden due to the declining structural integrity of the sub-grade parking garage that would support the needs of it’s current residents while maintaining the character and identity of the place. Copper Mountain Feasibility Study – Copper Mountain, CO Max served as the landscape designer during the master planning process that considered the values of balancing landscape conservation and development density for a mixed-use neighborhood. Middlebrook Farms – Des Moines, IA Max served as the landscape designer on this community of 1000 homes and mixed-use town center. The first phase of development includes a town farm, community garden, some single-family homes and a 1900-era schoolhouse that is being refurbished as a craft brewery. Recently Submitted Land-Use Applications 239 Willoughby Way – Aspen, CO Aspen Valley Ranch – Aspen, CO McLain Flats Ranch – Aspen, CO 71 Salvation – Aspen, CO 188 Loge’s Spring Road – Aspen, CO Castle Creek Valley Ranch Lot 5 – Aspen, CO 7 Project Team Design Workshop Education Master of Urban and Regional Planning, Physical Planning and Design, University of Michigan Bachelor of Arts, International Studies – World Economy and Business, The Ohio State University Professional Affiliations Urban Land Institute (ULI) *Indicated project completed prior to joining DW Eric Krohngold LEAD MARKET ANALYST Eric is a member of the Strategic Services team based out of DW’s Denver Office. Prior to joining DW, Eric provided real estate development and facility planning advisory services to colleges and universities throughout the United States. He received his bachelor’s in International Studies with a focus on Economics and Business from Ohio State University and a Master of Urban and Region and Planning from the University of Michigan. Eric believes strongly in the transformative power of community and market driven real estate development projects and is passionate about weaving community engagement efforts throughout the project planning process. His skills range from regional market analysis and master planning to individual project market and financial feasibility studies. Select Project Experience Amory Hall Market Study – Aspen, CO Eric was the project manager on this project that explored new uses for the Aspen Armory Hall. This included extensive stakeholder interviews, situational analysis and market feasibility analysis and reporting. Aspen Residential Development Moratorium Support – Aspen, CO Eric was the project manager and led efforts with the City of Aspen as they explored code and policy amendments related to residential development, including updates to the Growth Management Quota System. This included community engagement meetings, surveys, focus group meetings, and analysis. Aspen Multi-family Replacement Economic Study – Aspen, CO Land values, expiring deed restrictions, and a complex development code created a convergence of issues that inhibited the development of affordable housing in Aspen. Eric developed customized financial models that allowed for the testing of multiple development scenarios and changes to existing code language. New Mexico State University Campus Enhancement Initiative – Las Cruces, NM* Eric was part of the project team that facilitated a competitive 18-month solicitation process to outsource a portion of New Mexico State University’s Auxiliary Business enterprise. The 18-month process resulted in a 50-year management agreement with Sodexo and is expected to provide a financial return the University in excess of $2 billion. 8 Project Team Alex is a member of the Strategic Services team. Prior to working at Design Workshop, Alex was the Director of Investor Relations and Special Events at the Jefferson Chamber of Commerce in Metairie, Louisiana. There, she focused on investor relations, sponsorship management, and corporate events. She facilitated community engagement efforts, participated in planning and policy processes, and collaborated with stakeholders from diverse backgrounds and perspectives. Alex views placemaking as a holistic and adaptable approach to development and design, and is passionate about integrating people-centered strategies into planning for economic development, climate resiliency, and community health. Select Project Experience San Miguel County East End Plan – San Miguel County, CO Aspen Residential Development Moratorium Support – Aspen, CO Aspen Armory Market Analysis – Aspen, CO Alex Zarookian Market Analyst Education Master of Urban Placemaking and Management, Pratt Institute Bachelor of Management and Marketing, Tulane University Leen is a planner at Design Workshop. She is passionate about planning and designing places that cultivate community, prosperity, and connectivity. She has experience working on mixed-use, transit-oriented projects in different metro areas around the United States. Her research efforts have centered on achieving equitable outcomes for underserved communities, including proposing innovative approaches to affordable housing in Phoenix, identifying opportunities in the platform economy for women in Bangkok, and advancing the “right to the city” UN-Habitat framework in Beirut. Select Project Experience Tempe Parks and Recreation Equity Study – Tempe, AZ San Miguel County East End Plan – San Miguel County, CO Due Diligence Reports – Various Locations Leen Elharake Planner and Community Engagement Support Education Master of Urban and Environmental Planning, Arizona State University, Tempe Bachelor of Architecture, Lebanese American University 9 Project Team Pitkin County Public Library, Aspen, CO PROJECT EXPERIENCE Design Workshop Aspen Facilities Master Plan Aspen, Colorado The Aspen municipal operations were faced with an acute space shortage and no option for a long- term lease for current operations. Design Workshop began this project by reviewing all city-owned properties to determine sites suitable for this type of development. Through detailed site assessments and a series of development conclusions (access, neighborhood compatibility, usable site area and zoning implications), a site was selected for a new police station and new city offices. The Facilities Master Plan resulted in two implemented development projects. DW provided landscape architecture services for all outdoor spaces of the city facility buildings. Site features include courtyards, employee gathering spaces, streetscapes that transition into building entries, and plazas for civic gathering. DW was responsible for facilitating public outreach, collecting input through public open houses and stakeholder focused meetings. DW developed construction documents and saw the projects through construction observation. Client City of Aspen Services Provided Pre-development, Site Assessments, Landscape Architecture, Community Engagement 12 Project Experience Design Workshop Design Workshop Aspen Armory Hall Market Study Aspen, Colorado The Armory has served Aspen’s community in many ways throughout its history, but a consistent purpose has been its role as a public- facing community hub. With the new City Hall completing construction in 2021, the City of Aspen faced a new challenge: what use would the historic Aspen Armory Hall serve to its local community? To honor the Armory’s history and perpetuate its legacy for future generations, redevelopment must strategically incorporate design, market-supportable uses, flexible programming, and amenities and services that meet the needs of Aspen’s modern community. Design Workshop was hired to complete a market feasibility report that involved extensive stakeholder interviews and marketing analysis to evaluate final use options backed by the local community. Through engagement and outreach efforts the following programming options were identified and examined: food service, flexible meeting space, retail and non-profit office space. Client City of Aspen Services Provided Market Analysis, Stakeholder Engagement Image Credit: History Colorado 14 Project Experience Aspen Residential Development Moratorium Support Aspen, Colorado Facing an unprecedented surge in residential development, the City of Aspen declared an emergency moratorium on all residential building permit and land use applications in December 2021. The city sought to understand the impacts growth in the free-market residential sector was having on the community in terms of affordable housing needs, mass and scale, and transportation impacts. The city hired Design Workshop to lead analysis efforts, policy work, and community engagement and to support their code development. The technical scope of this project involved reviewing current affordable housing zoning allowances, residential permitting trends, real estate transactions, traits of existing market-rate and affordable housing stock, and completing a case study analysis. The Design Workshop team focused engagement efforts to hear from a broad spectrum of the community. Engagement events included individual interviews, small group discussions, community open houses, and pop- up events throughout Aspen’s neighborhoods. Aspen Community Voice, email blasts, and newspaper ads provided information about the project in digital and print opportunities. The robust engagement process resulted in clear direction for new land use requirements. Adopted in June 2022, the new code sets innovative standards for residential development that limit the amount of scrape and replace development, increase housing mitigation requirements, and diverts construction waste from the landfill. Client City of Aspen Services Provided Public Facilitation and Outreach, Policy Analysis, Housing Analysis, Code Drafting Project Experience 15 impact development improvements. Building on their efforts, the team is currently in a schematic design process to implement improvements outlined in the master plan within the Pedestrian Mall, including: • Developing guidelines for redevelopment, • Verifying technical details and infrastructure planning, • Confirming historic preservation strategies, • Identifying a roadmap for construction phasing and implementation, • Developing an understanding of costs, and • Strategizing construction management tools to assist business along the malls. Aspen Pedestrian Mall Aspen, Colorado In 1976 the City of Aspen transformed four, automobile-dominant streets into the Aspen Pedestrian Mall, today one of the community’s most celebrated and iconic public spaces. However, after years of development and growth led to deteriorating infrastructure, inaccessible surfaces, and a forecasted wave of redevelopment. Challenged to find effective, yet sensitive solutions to protect the historic character of the area, the City of Aspen hired Design Workshop to create a redevelopment master plan for the future of the mall. The team developed a community-driven plan for the city that identified preservation goals with sustainable infrastructure, accessibility, and low- Client City of Aspen Services Provided Master Planning, Landscape Architecture, Community Engagement 16 Project Experience Design Workshop Workshop developed construction documents and saw the project through construction observation. Client Aspen Police Station Services Provided Pre-development, Site Assessments, Landscape Architecture, Community Engagement Aspen Police Station Aspen, Colorado Identified in the Facilities Master Plan, the Aspen Police Station suffered from space shortage, lack of affordable housing option and no long- term lease options. Through rigorous analysis, it was decided that instead of looking for existing housing and lease options, a new police station were to be constructed with affordable employee housing units on site. Design Workshop provided landscape architecture services for all outdoor spaces of the new police station. A public courtyard will host various police functions including a public bike auction, bike safety course and community bbq’s. A semi-private employee courtyard will allow for staff meetings and shift breaks. Design Project Experience 17 Design Workshop Telluride Community Vision and Action Plan Telluride, Colorado Telluride has a special history of mining, recreation, and culture within the American West. The town maintains a down-to-earth vibe celebrating local arts and culture with unparalleled access to recreation - from skiing in the winter to mountain biking and hiking in the summer and a plethora of year-round festivals. Yet Telluride has also changed over the past decade and the time has come for the community to come together in a discussion about how to plan for the future of housing, economy, transportation, and environment over the next 10 years. The Town hired Design Workshop to lead the Telluride 2022 Community Vision and Action Plan process, which will define the vision and values of the community, with targeted actions to support future planning efforts. Guided by a robust community engagement strategy of surveys, pop-up events and listening sessions, this vision plan is an intentional roadmap to guide decision making that reflects the core values of Telluride to inspire action. The work identifies what makes Telluride a livable community where the highest quality of life and measures are achieved. The vision plan will set the stage for a future master plan update which will expand upon the goals through policy and regulations to achieve the vision. Client Town of Telluride Services Provided Community Planning, Facilitation, Vision Planning APA STAR AWARDCOMPREHENSIVE PLANNING APA COLORADO MERIT AWARD IN COIMMUNITY ENGAGEMENT 18 Project Experience Aspen Land Use Planning Projects Aspen, Colorado Prior to joining Design Workshop, Jessica worked for the City of Aspen, including extensive experience processing land use applications. A sampling of these cases are linked here. Additionally, Design Workshop is currently providing the City of Aspen with support in reviewing and writing approvals for pending land use applications. Jessica Garrow’s Project Experience • Sky Hotel – Commercial Design Growth Management and Subdivision • Aspen Club – Planned Development, Growth Management, Commercial Design and Subdivison • Stage 3 (625 E Main) – Subdivision Review • Theatre Aspen Permanent Structure – Growth Management and Specially Planned Area Review • 1150 Cemetery Lane – Residential Design Standard Variance • Aspen Alps – Planned Development Designation • Little Nell Ski Hill Turf Replacement – Greenline Review Exemption • X Games Special Event Light Display – Temporary Use Review Project Experience 19 Design Workshop Relevant Project List Project Name Location Aspen Armory Hall Market Study Aspen, CO Aspen Facilities Master Plan Aspen, CO Aspen Institute Marble Garden Restoration Aspen, CO Aspen Galena Plaza Aspen, CO Aspen Gondola Plaza Aspen, CO Aspen Jewish Community Center Aspen, CO Aspen Music School Campus Aspen, CO Aspen Pedestrian Mall Aspen, CO Aspen Police Station Aspen, CO Aspen Residential Development Moratorium Support Aspen, CO Aspen Sundeck Aspen, CO Hotel Jerome Remodel Aspen, CO Joplin Public Library Joplin, MO Pitkin County Public Library Aspen, CO Telluride Community Vision Plan Telluride, CO San Miguel County East End Master Plan San Miguel County, CO Hourly Rates Team Member Hourly Rate Jessica Garrow $275 Darla Callaway $275 Ashley Hejitmanek $200 Max Guzzetta $175 Eric Krohngold $200 Alex Zarookian $130 Leen Elharake $110 20 Project Experience SCOPE & FEE Aspen Residential Development Moratorium Support, Aspen, CO Design Workshop The following Scope of Services details the steps that will be needed to complete the community engagement, site planning, and the preparation of the land use application to allow for the City of Aspen Armory Hall Remodel and Reuse project. Scope of Work Task 1 Review Existing Conditions Task 1.1 Strategic Kick-Off and Consultant Team Site Visit Design Workshop will join the team for an in-person or virtual SKO and site visit. The Principal-in-Charge and Project Manager will be in attendance. Task 1 Deliverables: • Strategic Kick-off attendance • One day consultant team site visit Task 2 Enhanced Schematic Design Task 2.1 Community Engagement Community engagement is a critical aspect of the Armory project. We will prepare a Plan and Schedule for effective public engagement, referred to as Community Engagement Plan, to build on the success of the city’s previous efforts. We will work with staff to categorize the groups and individuals that have be identified as key stakeholders that should be engaged in the process. We will monitor stakeholder engagement and strategic touchpoints throughout the process to track engagement and metrics. Updates and review of the tracking system, and engagement with targeted stakeholder groups will be assessed at key milestones during the project to ensure adaptability and efficacy of stakeholder engagement. Task 2.2 Site Design Assistance It is our understanding that the Parks Department will be providing design services for all site improvements. However, Design Workshop can provide site design assistance through collaboration with the Parks Department upon request. It is assumed that Design Workshop may assist in the development of conceptual site plan alternatives in collaboration with the project team at this phase. The scope of services may include additional site analysis, site plan concept generation, development of exhibits or illustrative renderings, 3D modeling, interdisciplinary coordination and attendance at meetings. The extent and level of involvement of such tasks is not currently fully known. As such, tasks will be billed on an as needed Time and Materials Basis. Task 2.3 Community Engagement and Public Meetings Design Workshop will coordinate with the city’s communications department to build upon the outreach that has already been undertaken in identifying project programming and stakeholder engagement. At the completion of the Part 1 Enhanced Schematic Design Scope and the development of two initial design and operations studies, Design Workshop will coordinate and lead one engagement session to discuss and receive feedback from the community prior to review by City Council. Additionally, Design Workshop will participate in one work session to solidify direction on the two schematic design options and will facilitate a second to determine the final path for submitting a land use application. In support of the Enhanced Schematic Design process the following public meetings and outreach strategies will be conducted. • Mass Emailing Effort: Design Workshop will provide an email template including text and applicable graphics to be used as a community outreach tool. We anticipate the city will send the email through their project email or the Aspen Community Voice platform. • Advertising Effort: In order to reach a broader range of stakeholders advertising via radio, newspaper and social media will be critical. Design Workshop will provide a “press packet” that can be used with local news outlets and community information sources and channels. We will include a schedule indicating when advertisements and social media posts should announce various planning efforts and information. This will link them to the project website and project information. Leveraging existing communication channels and socials will serve to amplify the opportunities for community engagement and provide distinct metrics for reporting project reach. • Online Survey: We will work with city staff to develop an open questionnaire to understand key thoughts and ideas around the Armory Hall Remodel and Reuse schematic design concepts. This may cover a full range of policies 22 Scope & Fee that need to be informed by public opinion. Our scope anticipates Design Workshop will create the online survey and the City will distribute information through Aspen Community Voice. In addition, we suggest using business cards with a QR code and Flyers around the community to share information. These will be provided for distribution at community events encouraging people to take the online survey. We also recommend gathering questions and responding through Aspen Community Voice using the existing platform tools. • In-Person Outreach Event: Meeting the community where they are at is an important way to gather input. Design workshop will facilitate one (1) in-person outreach event including preparations associated with the display of materials. We propose conducting the meeting at Armory Hall and it is assumed that the event will last approximately three (3) hours plus preparation time. Three Design Workshop staff will be available to support the engagement event. • Outreach Summary Report: Design Workshop will prepare a robust engagement summary identifying the ideas, themes, and goals identified by the community through the process. This task will compile all the feedback into a graphic report that can be easily understood by the community. We will also create up to 10 PowerPoint slides that describe the process and key findings that can be used at the council work session. • City Council Work Sessions: Design Workshop will attend two (2) City Council work session public meetings during the schematic design effort. We assume 4 hours for both the Principal-in-Charge and Project Manager to attend both public meetings in addition to staff preparation time. Task 3 Support for Land Use Application and Review Process Armory Hall is located in the Public (PUB) zone district with a Planned Development (PD) Overlay. The proposed development will require a PD amendment, and associated land use reviews. As a public project, the Armory Hall Remodel and Reuse qualifies for a Public Project Review, pursuant to chapter 26.500. This consolidates what can be three to four steps of review into two. This scope assumes that the Public Process review will be utilized, with reviews at the Historic Preservation Commission (HPC) and then City Council. Based on initial studies and the Architecture/Design RFP, we understand that the proposed scope of work includes: • Removal of the present second story resulting in a square footage reduction of +/-5,000sq.ft. • Potential building addition along the northern alley was to reclaim the square footage lost. • Updated mechanical and HVAC infrastructure to accommodate food services and updated program. • Structural improvements and preservation / repair of building façade. • Site improvements to Connor Memorial Park and the Army Lot. • Roof replacement. • Replacement of interior finishes. • Circulation for building and transportation improvements, as necessary. • ADA compliant improvements. Given the Armory Hall’s designation on the Aspen Inventory of Historic Sites and Structures and location in the Community Outreach Event. Telluride Community Vision and Action Plan, Telluride, CO Scope & Fee 23 Design Workshop Commercial Core, an HP Major Review will be required, pursuant to Chapter 26.415 in addition to a Commercial Design Review, pursuant to Chapter 26.412. Design Workshop will work directly with the project team to ensure architectural and site planning meet the requirements of these design- based reviews. Additionally, the Armory is considered an Essential Public Facility (EPF). The addition of any new net leasable space will require a Growth Management Review. As an EPF this review requires HPC to determine how many employees are generated by the space, and then City Council determines the amount of housing mitigation, if any is required. (Applicable Review Section 26.470.110.d, City Council Reviews, Essential Public Facility) Any new space will also require the creation of parking spaces and/or transportation mitigation, pursuant to Chapter 26.515, Transportation and Parking Management. As an Essential public facility building inside the Aspen Infill area, these requirements will be established by Special Review. Design Workshop anticipates using the existing Transportation Impact Analysis tool as the guide for determining these impacts and appropriate mitigation methods. The existing zoning as a Planned Development will require a PD Amendment to adjust dimensions and the exterior design. Based on the scope of work, we anticipate this will be considered a Major PD Amendment(Section 26.445.110.f., Major Amendment). Finally, we expect there to be a view plane review given the project’s position within the Courthouse view plane, pursuant to Chapter 26.435. Armory Hall rests within the foreground for both View Planes, and the team will be required to show that any adjustments on the roof do not infringe on the view plane. We will work with the design team to ensure changes to the roof keep the view plane constraint in mind during the design phase. Additionally, a view plane survey will be required to show compliance with the code requirements. It is assumed that all of these reviews will be consolidated through the Public Project review to a review and recommendation with HPC and a final decision with City Council. The following scope of work is proposed for the land use review process: Task 3.1 Pre-Application Meeting Design Workshop will join a pre- application meeting with the Community Development Department. This meeting will be completed in person. At this meeting, the city will identify the required land use review processes and application materials, including the opportunity to use the Public Project review process. Deliverables • Pre-Application meeting attendance. • Pre-application meeting summary (from Community Development). Task 3.2 Land Use Application Development Based on the pre-application meeting summary, Design Workshop will prepare a land use application. This is anticipated to include Growth Management Review for Essential Public Facility, Special Review for Parking and Transportation, View To this day, “workshop” remains a hallmark of our firm, supporting collaboration and experimentation. 24 Scope & Fee Plane Review, a PD Amendment, a Commercial Design Review, and Historic Preservation Commission review. Design Workshop will complete a Level 1 Traffic Impact Analysis (TIA) to ensure proposed improvements will meet the code requirements. Deliverables • Draft written land use application, based on final proposed architectural drawings. • Review of draft application with City Project Manager before submission. • Final land use application package, to be submitted as required by the Community Development Department. Task 3.3 Land Use Application Processing After the land use application is submitted, Design Workshop will lead the project through the city’s review process. Design Workshop will prepare the public notice, which will include mailing to neighbors and posting the property. We anticipate utilizing the Aspen Community Voice platform to ensure the community is informed about the application and the overall review process. The scope assumes the land use process will include one meeting with Community Development Staff, three meetings with City Council, and four meetings with the Historic Preservation Commission. Additional meetings will be billed on a time and materials basis. If approved, Design Workshop will work with the Community Development Department to finalize any required documents for recordation. Deliverables • Preparation for all public hearings, including presentations and prep meetings with Parks Department staff. • Compilation of final documents as requested by Community Development. • Three (3) meeting with City Council. Assume three (3) hours per. meeting with four (4) hours of staff preparation time. • Four (4) meeting with the Historic Preservation Commission. Assume three (3) hours per meeting with four (4) hours of staff preparation time. Task 4 Design Development At the Design Development Stage, the general objective for this phase of the work is to develop the character and add greater detail the proposed landscape plan. Based on the approved Schematic Design Plan, Design Workshop will prepare a Design Development Plan. The scope of services may include refinement to selected schematic site plan design, mechanical equipment layout and screening analysis, circulation analysis, exhibits or illustrative renderings, 3D modeling, interdisciplinary coordination and attendance at meetings. The extent and level of involvement of such tasks is not currently fully known. As such, tasks will be billed on an as needed Time and Materials Basis. It is our understanding that the Parks Department will be providing design services for this phase and the Construction Documentation Phase. As such, the following Design Workshop scope exclusions apply: • Development of the Construction Documentation drawings set. • Development of site technical specifications. • Material and Finish selections or coordination with vendors and manufacturers. Task 5 Support for Recordation Documents Following approval of the land use application, the City requires a final plan set to be recorded as Approval Documents. Design Workshop will work with the team to ensure a coordinated set of engineering, landscape, and architectural drawings, in compliance with the requirements of Section 26.490, Approval Documents, of the city’s land use code. This will include a plan set, as well as development agreement, as may be required by the city. We will also work with the design team to determine the cost estimates for improvements to ensure the required financial guarantees and site protection requirements can be met. We will work with the City Attorney’s Office and Finance Department to determine the appropriate method of guaranteeing these improvements. In person coordination with city departments is anticipated as part of this task. All recording fees will be determined at the time of recordation by Pitkin County and are assumed to be a separate fee paid directly by the City. Scope & Fee 25 Design Workshop Enhanced Schematic Design Part 1a and 1b 20 weeks Land Use Application and Review Part 2 32 Weeks Design Development Part 3 14 weeks Approval Recordation Part 4 4 weeks Construction Document Part 5 16 weeks Commence January 2024 June 2024 June 2024 December 2024 September 2024 Conclude May 2024 December 2024 September 2024 December 2024 December 2024 Name Title Hourly Rate Hours/Week Fee $’s/Week Hours/Week Fee $’s/Week Hours/Week Fee $’s/Week Hours/Week Fee $’s/Week Hours/Week Fee $’s/Week Jessica Garrow Principal Planner CE $275 3.50 $935 4 $1,074 --7 $1,925 Time per staff person per week not provide for this phase of work Darla Callaway Principal LA $275 0.75 $193 --2 $530 -- Ashley Hejtmanek Historic Preservation $200 0.75 $140 0.50 $88 ---- Max Guzzetta Project Manager $175 5.25 $910 3.50 $607 3.50 $600 14 $2,450 Leen Elharake Planner CE $110 8 $853 4.50 $481 4 $440 12 $1,320 Total DW Fee $’s per week $3,030 $2,250 $1,570 $5,695 Total DW Fees $’s Per Phase $60,600 $72,00 $21,985 $22,780 Design Workshop Fee 26 Scope & Fee Enhanced Schematic Design Part 1a and 1b 20 weeks Land Use Application and Review Part 2 32 Weeks Design Development Part 3 14 weeks Approval Recordation Part 4 4 weeks Construction Document Part 5 16 weeks Commence January 2024 June 2024 June 2024 December 2024 September 2024 Conclude May 2024 December 2024 September 2024 December 2024 December 2024 Name Title Hourly Rate Hours/Week Fee $’s/Week Hours/Week Fee $’s/Week Hours/Week Fee $’s/Week Hours/Week Fee $’s/Week Hours/Week Fee $’s/Week Jessica Garrow Principal Planner CE $275 3.50 $935 4 $1,074 --7 $1,925 Time per staff person per week not provide for this phase of work Darla Callaway Principal LA $275 0.75 $193 --2 $530 -- Ashley Hejtmanek Historic Preservation $200 0.75 $140 0.50 $88 ---- Max Guzzetta Project Manager $175 5.25 $910 3.50 $607 3.50 $600 14 $2,450 Leen Elharake Planner CE $110 8 $853 4.50 $481 4 $440 12 $1,320 Total DW Fee $’s per week $3,030 $2,250 $1,570 $5,695 Total DW Fees $’s Per Phase $60,600 $7 2,00 $21,985 $22,780 Scope & Fee 27 www.designworkshop.com DW LEGACY DESIGN® Legacy Design is the defining element of our practice. It is our commitment to an elevated level of design inquiry to arrive at the optimal solutions for clients. The process ensures that our projects reflect the critical issues facing the built environment and that they deliver measurable benefit to clients and communities. It is the foundation of the firm’s workshop culture and guides all projects. www.designworkshop.com DW LEGACY DESIGN® Legacy Design is the defining element of our practice. It is our commitment to an elevated level of design inquiry to arrive at the optimal solutions for clients. The process ensures that our projects reflect the critical issues facing the built environment and that they deliver measurable benefit to clients and communities. It is the foundation of the firm’s workshop culture and guides all projects. Statement of Qualifications Shums Coda Associates Building Life-Safety Services Firm Profile Shums Coda Associates, Inc Shums Coda Associates (SCA) was established in 2006, by licensed building professionals with over 25 years of municipal consulting experience. SCA merged with Colorado Code Consulting (CCC) in December 2020, expanding our team and experience. Our core services are building life-safety code reviews, inspections, and administrative staffing, on behalf of jurisdictional clients. We review and inspect all facets of design construction related to code minimums and local amendments, such as: architectural, accessibility, structural, fire-safety, energy, green building, mechanical, electrical, and plumbing; and have staff to assist with associated reporting. By selecting SCA, we offer our experienced, knowledgeable team with a proven track record of outstanding service. In providing these services, our priority is to be available for code expertise, on-time delivery of services, and providing cost-effectiveness through the utilization of focused staff services (as needed). We are comprised of licensed architects, engineers, contractors, and I.C.C. Certified personnel that have a wealth of code knowledge and experience in design or construction related fields. SCA believes that an understanding of how buildings are designed and constructed is an important element to providing effective code comments that are based on the realities of practical construction. SCA preaches this to our staff and encourages continuing education to maintain our understanding of the ever-changing code requirements and amendments. Depending on the code section, we have seen there can be a great deal of interpretation applied to how requirements are enforced, so SCA staff continues to find value in learning the history and intent of code language to assist with accurately applying it to our reviews and inspections (with final determinations clearly coming from the municipal client staff). SCA takes this commitment to code content further, as we continue to expand our involvement in various code training and education offerings. For example, SCA’s Sacramento Regional Manager/ Business Development Director, Mr. Terry Knox, continues to provide leadership to the SVABO ICC Chapter, by serving as the Education Committee Chair and organizing the annual Institute event. We have similar roles for the ICC EduCode training through the Southern Nevada ICC Chapter in Las Vegas, and the bi-annual Arizona Education Weeks that are offered by AZBO. Mr. Steve Thomas (who previously owed Colorado Code Consulting) is our Colorado Regional Manager/ Educational Director who provides national education and training offerings throughout the United States. This should demonstrate SCA’s commitment to knowledge through education with all things related to the model Building Codes. Our belief is that code should be understood by our staff to a level where they can explain to our clients, the how and why it applies to their specific project. We strive to meet this level with our reviews and inspections, and in some instances, we can even offer on-line discussions related to that code understanding. SCA’s corporate headquarters are located in Pleasanton, California, with regional offices throughout California (Sacramento), Arizona (Phoenix), Nevada (Las Vegas), Utah (St. George/Murray) and Colorado (Denver). Between all of our locations you will find SCA has nearly one-hundred employees available to assist with plan reviews and inspections as needed. Our preference is to utilize local staff to provide the code services, but with the recent pandemic, we have expanded our electronic capacity to be able to review projects from any of our offices. This means that we can provide an even greater degree of expertise for unusual systems related to structural, mechanical, plumbing, or electrical, as well as CASp/accessibility reviews. It also affords us the ability to utilize staff from all locations to ensure that assessments are completed by the timelines established. NAU – Honors College & Housing, Flagstaff, AZ Statement of Qualifications Shums Coda Associates Building Life-Safety Services Resumes Stephen “Steve” Thomas Colorado Regional Manager, Education Director Education B.S. in Business Administration - University of Phoenix - Thesis: “The Affects of a Housing Code in the City of Glendale” Course Work in Civil Engineering Technology - CCD Community College of Denver at Red Rocks Lakewood, CO 1976 -1978 Licenses & Certifications ICC # 829160 ICC Building Plans Examiner ICC Building Code Specialist ICC Plumbing Inspector ICC / AACE Property Maintenance and Housing Inspector ICC Building Inspector ICC Building Code Official ICC Accessibility Inspector/Plans Examiner ICC Housing Code Official ICC Mechanical Inspector ICC Residential Plans Examiner ICC Certified Building Official Memberships International Code Council National Fire Protection Association Colorado Chapter ICC Utah Chapter ICC Arizona Building Officials Colorado Municipal League AIA Provider Publications Building Code Basics, 2009 IBC Building Code Basics, 2012 IBC Building Code Essentials, 2015 IBC Building Code Essential, 2018 IBC Applying the Codes to Cannabis Facilities PROFFESSIONAL SUMMARY Stephen “Steve” Thomas has over 40 years in the Building and Safety Industry. From Inspector, Plans Examiner, and a Building Official he has done it all. Through his experiences, he created Colorado Code Consulting and was the president of the company between 1999 and 2020. He joined SCA in 2020 and continues to provide building code services to our clients. Steve is also a successful course instructor for many courses including: The Community College of Denver, Lakewood Colorado – Intro. to Building Codes, International Code Council Contract, Colorado Chapter ICC Educational Institute, Denver, CO, Southern Nevada Chapter ICC EduCode, Las Vegas, NV, Washington Association of Building Officials, Olympia, WA, Arizona Building Officials, Tucson, AZ, Oregon Building Officials Association, Eugene, OR, Utah Chapter ICC, Sandy, UT and St. George UT, AIA Colorado, Denver, CO, and Johnson County Contractor Licensing Dept. Overland Park, KS. PROFESSIONAL EXPERIENCE Colorado Regional Manager --- December 2020 - Present Education Director Shums Coda Associates Responsible for business services and client relations in Colorado. Serves as local point of contact and project manager for plan review, inspection, staff augmentation and other services provided. President and Owner --------------- 1999 – December 2020 Colorado Code Consultant, Denver, CO *Acquired by Shums Coda Associates in December 2020 Building Official ------------------------------------- 1981 – 1999 Community Development Director City of Glendale, Glendale, CO Building Inspector ---------------------------------- 1978 – 1981 Plans Examiner Building Official The Building Department, Inc., Denver, CO Quality Control Testing Technician ----------- 1977 – 1978 Materials Testing, Inc., Denver, CO Statement of Qualifications Shums Coda Associates Building Life-Safety Services Resumes William “Bill” Clayton, CBO Plans Examiner/ Instructor Education General Studies and Agriculture, Clackamas Community College, Oregon City, OR General Studies, Physical Education & Music, Mt. Hood Community College, Gresham, OR Licenses & Certifications ICC Mechanical Inspector UMC ICC Building Inspector ICC Certified Building Official ICC Plumbing Inspector ICC Residential Fire Sprinkler Inspector/Plans Examiner ICC Building Plans Examiner ICC /AACE Property Maintenance and Housing Inspector ICC Plumbing Inspector UPC ICC Building Code Official ICC Accessibility Inspector/Plans Examiner ICC Housing Code Official ICC Residential Energy Inspector/Plans Examiner ICC Mechanical Inspector ICC Building Code Specialist Memberships International Code Council (ICC) Colorado Chapter ICC PROFFESSIONAL SUMMARY William Clayton has been in the building and construction industry for well over 40 years. William brings with him a multitude of experience from a Building Contractor, Plans Examiner, Building Inspector, and a Chief Building Official. PROFESSIONAL EXPERIENCE Plans Examiner ------------------------- December 2020 - Present Shums Coda Associates • Reviews complex plans for building construction. • Review plans, calculations, and specifications for compliance with the most current adopted codes and ordinances. • Preparation of Plans Comments Letter according to industry and SCA standards. • Meet and confer with the clients as needed to clarify plan check comments • Travel to jurisdictions on an as-needed basis to support clients. Instructor -------------------------------- December 2020 - Present Shums Coda Associates Plans Examiner/ Instructor ------------- 2015 – December 2020 Colorado Code Consulting LLC, Denver, CO *Acquired by Shums Coda Associates in December 2020 Building Codes Administrator (Building Official)- 2007 - 2015 City of Lakewood, Lakewood, CO Senior Building Plans Analyst & Office Staff Supervisor ----- 2004 – 2007 City of Westminster, Westminster, CO Assistant Building Plans Analyst -------------------- 1996 – 2004 City of Westminster, Westminster, CO Building Inspector -------------------------------------- 1994 – 1996 Pike Peak Regional Building Dept., Colorado Springs, CO The Collaborative Inc. A Small Business With a National Practice Company Snapshot First Established: 1974 Offices: Boulder & Durango, Colorado Small Business Professional Disciplines: * Architectural Conservation * Materials Conservation * Historic Architecture * Maritime Artifacts Conservation * Architectural Historian * Historian * Planning Preservation Services: * Existing Buildings Documentation * Preservation Architecture * Conditions Evaluations (BER, HSR, Etc.) * Conservation of Maritime Artifacts * Feasibility Analysis * Heritage Tourism Development & Planning * Historic Materials Analysis * Laboratory Analysis of Historic Materials * Market Studies * Maintenance Plans * National & State Register Nominations * Site Master Plans & Landscape Preservation * Tax Act Certifications * Percentage of Projects Subject to the Secretary of the Interiors Guidelines: 98% Project Scale: * $165,000,000.00-$10,000.00 * From 500,000 Square Feet To 20 Square Feet * From 20 Stories in Height To Root Cellars Geographic Regions: * More Than 47 States & 2 U.S. Territories, from projects at high altitudes and at sea level * From Alaska To St. Croix, U.S. Virgin Islands The Collaborative Inc. l the Collaborative, inc. The Collaborative, Inc. (tCi), first established in 1974, was incorporated in 1993. Through these years, we have been actively engaged in historic preservation, providing a comprehensive range of services for private and public entities. Over the past 30 years, the firm has been headed up by Dean Brookie, AIA, Chief Historic Architect and John Feinberg, Principal Architectural Conservator. Much of tCi’s work has been for state governments, such as SHPOs in four states. Below is a sampling of several projects that have been funded by grants from History Colorado’s State Historical Fund. •Hartnagle Agricultural Complex in Boulder County, Historic Structure Assessment (HSA) •St. William's Lodge at Camp St. Malo in Allenspark, HSA •Ewing Barn in Fort Lupton, HSA •MacGregor Ranch in Estes Park, HSA •Ewing Farm in Lafayette, HSA •Corn Crib, City of Boulder Open Space Mountain Parks, Stabilization Plan •Hedgecock Property, Milkhouse and Ice House, City of Boulder Open Space Mountain Parks, Stabilization Plan •Van Vleet Ranch Stone Farm Shed, City of Boulder Open Space Mountain Parks, HSA Projects tCi completed for private entities include the Historic Structure Assessment we completed on the Sheridan Inn in Sheridan (Wyoming), the Highlandlake Church in Mead (Colorado), and the Historic Structure Report on the Central City Opera House in Central City. In addition, tCi has performed master plans and architectural conservation for Antioch College in Yellow Springs (Ohio) and Sterling College in Craftsbury Commons (Vermont). Federal government agencies that have utilized the wide range of historic preservation services tCi offers have included the National Park Service, the General Services Administration, the USDA Forest Service, the Bureau of Land Management, Department of the Treasury, Veteran’s Administration, Federal Highway Administration, and the Bureau of Reclamation. Our services in historic preservation provided for these clients and others (such as local governmental agencies and private enterprises) have included: •Historic Building Condition Assessments •Historic Structure Reports (with building histories) •Stabilization Plans •Comprehensive Preservation Plans and Specifications •Historic Materials Analysis •Determinations of Eligibility •National Register Nominations •Interpretive Planning from Communities to Museum Exhibits •Exhibits Design •Cyclical Maintenance Plans •Comprehensive Histories of Individual Buildings, Sites, Communities, and regions •Design Guidelines •Section 106 Compliance Specialized Experience: Masonry Conditions Evaluation and Design Services 1. History of Maintenance of Masonry system of building 2. Original materials identification and replacement availability including quarry re- opening 3. Hands-on condition Assessment 4. Causes of deterioration 5. Remedial treatments 6. Management of masonry materials testing programs 7. Management of consolidants testing programs 8. Mortar analysis in our laboratory 9. Cost estimation 10. Comprehensive and intensive reports preparation Materials: Granite Cast Concrete Block (imitation stone) Marble Limestone Sandstone Terra Cotta Brick Adobe Mortar Clients Local Governments Colleges and Universities Capitols State Buildings Division Federal Government Agencies: GSA, NPS, Treasury, VA, etc. State Government Historic Preservation Offices Private Corporations Non-Profit Corporations Overview For nearly 50 years we have provided government clients a comprehensive range of historic preservation architecture, site planning, conservation, and technical preservation services. If your current or future projects require a firm with our skills and deep experience, we would appreciate your consideration. The easy way to find out more about us is to visit our web site: http://www.theCollaborativeinc.net. What Makes Us Different? 1. Because we provide such a broad range of services, we craft each service to integrate with the next in the typical chronology of a project. By example, our advanced version of a Historic Structure Report facilitates the completion of a property nomination to state or national historic registers, results in enhanced fundraising, and provides the foundation for highly accurate preservation plans and specifications. The plans/specs integrate with the Cyclical Maintenance Plan. 2. Our depth of experience and knowledge reduces your risks by discovering hidden causes of the deterioration problems, defining the often multiple and interconnected causes, and determining cost effective, appropriate, and long-lasting solutions. We find and treat the real problems. 3. Our technical expertise, in-field testing equipment (including non-destructive), and historic materials laboratory serve to define and quantify the real problems. 4. Accuracy equates to reduced risks: less costs, minimal change orders, and an on- time schedule. We keep your project in budget and on schedule. 5. We provide you with accurate and critical information to make informed decisions. 6. The vast majority of clients are governments. For the General Services Administration, we have completed over 40 projects, principally on primary historic structures in 20 U.S. states and territories. For the National Park Service, we have completed a similar geographic range on differing project types: instead of courthouses, customs houses, post offices, and office buildings, the NPS structures have been hotels, trestles, presidents' homes, ranches, visitor centers, and forts. Other federal agencies have been the U.S.D.A. Forest Service, U.S. Treasury, U.S. Dept. of Veterans Affairs, U.S. Dept. of the Interior's Bureau of Reclamation, and the U.S. Dept. of Transportation's Federal Highway Administration. Compliance with the standards and guidelines of the U.S. Secretary of the Interior have been accomplished on all of these projects. If you believe you have a problem that needs solving, and if you believe we may be a logical choice in reaching that solution, do contact us. Resumes John Feinberg, APTI, Principal, founded Community Services Collaborative, the predecessor firm to the Collaborative Inc., in 1974. The firm was incorporated as The Collaborative Inc. (tCi), in 1993. John has headed up the firm’s growth from a local firm in 1974 to a national firm specializing in historic preservation, community planning, and tourism. The firm has had the pleasure of working on projects from Alaska to St. Croix, and brings this national perspective to each client’s needs. Ninety-five percent of John’s projects have been for buildings and sites listed on the National Register. Eighty-five percent of these assignments have been for local, state, and federal governments. The fact that the majority of firm’s projects are for repeat clients demonstrates John’s ability to manage jobs that are visible to the public eye (such as public buildings like courthouses and post offices), meet client objectives and measures of success, satisfy stakeholder concerns and interests, and for each client to be pleased enough with the results to hire him and his team repeatedly. The quality of Mr. Feinberg’s work is indicated by the honors awarded to the clients’ projects: local, state, and national. In over 46 years, he has successfully completed over 100 major Historic Structures Reports (HSRs). In addition, Mr. Feinberg has also completed site master plans, interpretive plans, and HSRs for the historic sites of the state historic preservation divisions of several states. The overall purpose of the building studies (historic structure report, historic structure assessments, and building evaluation reports) is to determine the condition of the historic buildings and to make recommendations and cost estimates for funding so that the buildings could be renovated to serve an additional 20 years. Architectural conservation, maritime conservation, structural forensics, and civil, mechanical, and electrical engineering consultants are frequently involved in these in-depth studies. Mr. Dean Brookie AIA, Principal, has specialized in public buildings evaluation and preservation design as well as the development of tourism facilities and commercial revitalization. As a planner, Mr. Brookie has completed urban design projects, re-use projects, and rural conservation planning. Dean has successfully completed 17 years as the principal historical architect for tCi. His success has been on a wide range of projects providing preservations plans, condition assessments, and preservation architectural plans and specifications. In addition to specific projects such as the National Capital of Ute Mountain Tribe, Crow Canyon Archaeological Center, and various historic preservation projects throughout the United States, which range from hotels in South Dakota, Colorado, Wyoming, New Mexico to museums, such as the preservation, management, and maintenance plan for the Nicolai Fechin House and studio in Taos, Mr. Brookie has also designed visitor centers for heritage parks; and completed site master plans for the Kansas State Capitol (1863- 1903), heritage parks, stand-alone heritage resources, and historic districts. John Feinberg Architectural Conservator Since 1977, with the completion of the 40-property historic structure report for the Central City Opera House Association, the firm's work has ever-increasingly focused on historic preservation until today, preservation represents 95% of the projects. All projects begin with a condition assessment. In 19 years as an adjunct University of Colorado Professor, his classes used the HSR as the capstone for the course. "With the HSR one is comprehensively documenting and evaluating a site and the heritage resources," states John. "Its completion demands a coordinated and comprehensive level of knowledge for it treats the resource as a single organism." John Feinberg has served as the Chief Conservator on all of the firm's collection of Assessments. Some of these projects have formats defined by the client, such as the National Park Service and the General Services Administration. For others, John sets the format to take into account the specific needs of a particular assessment and client. Historic Building Condition Assessments have been completed on more than 1,000 structures over the last 30 years with John Feinberg as the principal investigator. These represent a mix of stand-alone reports, and those completed as integral portions of the investigatory stages of a project for which the firm was retained, from the beginning to post renovation stages. Representative of stand-alone condition assessments are projects for the federal government's General Services Administration. These include Historic Structures Reports on many masonry federal buildings: U.S. Customs House and Post Office in St. Croix (circa 1743), the U.S. Courthouse in Charleston, South Carolina, the U.S. Customs House in New Orleans, Louisiana, and 40 other historic Customs Houses and Federal Courthouses throughout the United States. There also have been many private-sector masonry structures; for example, the Franklin Hotel in Deadwood, South Dakota and Antioch Hall and the Library at Antioch Collage in Yellow Springs, Ohio. In recent years, Historic Structures Reports have also been completed on the Junction City (Kansas) Opera House; St. Williams Lodge at Camp St. Malo in Allenspark, Colorado; the Laramie Plains Civic Center in Laramie, Wyoming; and on historic stone bridges in Manitou Springs, Colorado. In approaching historic structure assessments, tCi uses investigative philosophy, which is based on interactive information loops. The history informs the materials condition assessment, and the conditions assessment informs the history. "The historic construction photographs showed very small stone waste piles adjacent to the stone shop. Likewise the visit to the original stone quarry site had unusually small stone waste piles. The poor quality of the stone in the 1860s east wing of the Kansas Statehouse was because the contractor was behind schedule, the quarry manager was likewise behind and he shipped everything. No quality control." As part of the process of historic preservation, the firm begins with the analysis, prior to initializing the plans and specifications process, in order to discover unknown problems and to set forth methods and materials to reverse the effects and solve the underlying causes of deterioration. As team leader, a primary responsibility of Mr. Feinberg is to have an overall view. There are often multiple causes for a single effect; some causes may be discovered in a building's design, construction, and use. Others might be discovered during in-field observation, analysis, and testing in the laboratory. For example, when built-in gutters leak, the effects are often hidden as the water can leak into the wall. Maintenance procedures and lack of maintenance procedures are to be researched in order to project likely effects. Together this cluster of likely conditions problems is evaluated as to the most cost-effective investigative. "Our process begins with research into likely causative factors for deterioration, which allows us to select the investigative techniques best suited to the specific conditions." Historic preservation plans and specifications are completed under the overall direction of the Principal Architect of the firm. Mr. Feinberg's role is in solutions development for conservation of historic materials, replacement of missing historic fabric, and the specification of a historic interior's materials. Mr. Feinberg also contributes in cost estimation of these areas. Projects have been as large as the Kansas State Capitol (325,000 square feet) and as small as the Historic Highlandlake Church (1,480 square feet) in Mead, Colorado. Our projects have had a broad array of problems to solve and historic finishes to conserve: marble, granite, decorative plaster, ornate metalwork, scagliola, detailed woodwork, murals, and sculptures. "Each has its own specific requirements." Education: Bachelor of Arts, Environmental Design, Antioch College, 1970 Masters of Landscape Architecture & Land Planning, University of Massachusetts, 1972 Professional Associations: Association for Preservation Technology, ICOMOS, National Trust for Historic Preservation, Preservation Forum, The Stone Foundation, Architectural Woodwork Institute. Fetz-Keller Ranch Headquarters HomeMontrose, Colorado preserved historic siding. This combination sanitized the cavities and fully removed anddeodorized the rodent and bird infestation the COLLABORATIVE inc. 2080 Pearl Street 970 East 4th AvenueBoulder, Colorado 80302 Durango, Colorado 81301 303.442.3601 Fax: 449.3666 970247.1336 Fax: 259.3972info@thecollaborativeinc.net This beautiful two story Victorian home had been left vacant for several decades, overgrown with vegetation, no electricity, and inhabited by birds, rodents, and raccoons. The new owners wanted to fully renovate the house and began by having a successful nomination to the National Register prepared by Alpine Archeology. Our team was then selected to complete: a comprehensive conditions assessment, preservation plans and specifications, and applications for state and federal historic tax credits. The Collaborative inc team included structural engineering by Atkinson-Noland and Associates Inc; conditions assessment, materials analysis, and treatment plans and specifications. The Durango office of tCi did the field work documentation, existing drawings, and the preservation plans and specifications. The tCi Boulder office completed the Conditions Assessment Report, set the treatments scope, reviewed drawings, and prepared the state and federal tax credit forms. Multiple challenges led to a decision to remove the siding, clean up and preserve it for reinstallation, clean the cavities, install insulation, apply to the stud faces continuous structural insulation board with integral drainage channels, and then reinstall the now preserved historic siding. This combination sanitized the cavities and fully removed and deodorized the rodent and bird infestation residue, insulated the building walls, added structural sheathing, and removed lead paint in a controlled manner with total removal. Adaptive Reuse Sheridan Heritage Center Sheridan Inn Sheridan, Wyoming The Sheridan Inn is a National Historic Landmark located in the community of Sheridan, Wyoming at the foot of the Big Horn Mountains. Built by the W.F. Cody Hotel Company, and the Burlington and Missouri Railroad in 1893 to showcase the west and attract an ever burgeoning flow of tourists, the inn also promoted settlement of the coal mining and agricultural areas around Sheridan. Described as one of the finest hotels west of Chicago, many of the historic figures associated with the inn invoke imagers that are “larger than life”; Cody often held auditions for his Wild West Show on the inn’s front lawn. Like much, from this unpredictable time in American History, the Sheridan Inn has survived against odds, which brought it near the brink of destruction. It remains as a vivid archi- tectural reminder of an exciting period in the history of Wyoming, and the settle- ment of the western United States. The non-profit corporation that owns this historic inn, selected our firm to per- form a Historic Structures Report and Re-use Feasibility Analysis. tCi undertook the analysis of the Sherdan Inn, drawing on our firm’s expertise in historic build- ing evaluations, the renovation and marketing of historic hotels, and heritage tourism, to determine the feasibility of re-establishing the inn as a hotel, and to evaluate its potential for restaurant or conference and wedding venues. Market information was incorporated into a design program, which also included the Collaborative’s design parameters, stabilization, recommendations, and code requirements. Conceptual designs were completed and costs were estimated. The Sheridan Heritage Center is using this market analysis and physical evalua- tion to raise funds for the project. the COLLABORATIVE inc. 2080 Pearl Street 1221 Main Ave. Boulder, Colorado 80302 Durango, Colorado 81301 303.442.3601 Fax: 449.3666 970.247.1336 Fax: 259.3972collab@thecollaborativeinc.net Hotel Renovation Associates Tabor Grand Hotel Leadville, Colorado The Tabor Grand Hotel is located in Leadville, Colorado at 10,200 feet above sea level, the highest elevation for a city in the continental United States. Consequently, this structure has had to withstand major environmental forces such as heavy snows, extreme cold, and strong winds. The hotel has approximately 100 rooms, which include stores, banquet facilities, and restaurants. The building had not been used for a number of years,when the Collaborative evaluated this structure, taking existing fabric samples, and completing paint and mortar analyses, and adaptive reuse plans to utilize the building as an operating hotel once again. The restoration plans included analysis to allow for reproduction of lost details, material conservation, and site evaluation. The original ornate color scheme for the building was particularly difficult to determine, due to the extreme ultraviolet degradation of the original yellow paint at this altitude. The historic structure analysis revealed a variety of problem areas. It was important to evaluate the structural strength of the roofing system, since insulation was being added and the roof would be handling snowloads, leading to more weight than had previously been supported. The firm developed specific design parameters for new construction, noted alterations to be made to the existing historic fabric with- out loss of integrity, and itemized what missing elements should be reproduced, an example of which were porti- cos on the two main facades. Research uncovered historic photographs taken during the visit of President Ulysses S. Grant, which showed the presence of original porticos. Ghosts indicating the outline of these porticos were also found on the building exte- rior. Further research unearthed other photographs, which enabled the firm to detail the exact configuration of the missing porticos. Major structural concerns centered around the problem of rising damp, and subsurface investi- gation revealed no problems associated with soil type. Proper remedial measures were specified. the COLLABORATIVE inc. 2080 Pearl Street 1221 Main Ave. Boulder, Colorado 80302 Durango, Colorado 81301 303.442.3601 Fax: 449.3666 970.247.1336 Fax: 259.3972collab@thecollaborativeinc.net Building Evaluation State of Kansas Masonry Evaluation of the Kansas State Capitol Topeka, Kansas As part of a Historic Structures Report, the Collaborative performed a comprehensive masonry conditions evaluation for the Kansas State Capitol. With funding for the first phase and the oldest portion, the East Wing, an intensive evaluation determined the condi- tion of each of the more than 6,000 stones which, make up this building. Previous repairs were recorded, as were cur- rent problems, and the required remedial treatments identified. The information was then transferred from individual file sheets to a database for incorporation into construction plans, and repair tables. The preservation process included training masons in proper procedures by master preservation stone masons from RJW Stonemasons of Ottawa, Canada. A historic quarry was evaluated and reopened to provide the specific limestone to match that of the East Wing. the COLLABORATIVE inc. 2080 Pearl Street 1221 Main Ave.Boulder, Colorado 80302 Durango, Colorado 81301303.442.3601 Fax: 449.3666 970.247.1336 Fax: 259.3972collab@thecollaborativeinc.net Antioch College Continuation Corporation Antioch College Yellow Springs, Ohio In 1852, Antioch College was established, the first three buildings were completed in 1853, and the first President was Horace Mann. The last building was constructed in 1974. In 2008, the campus had 80 buildings, and the University trustees closed the College due to financial considerations, including a very long list of deferred maintenance. In June 2009, the Alumni hired the Collaborative inc. (tCi) to develop a coordinated plan of maintenance, preservation, and adaptive re‐use projects to commence after the purchase of the College in September 2009. Of the 25 major structures of the Main Campus, the majority is on the National Register and includes structures by SOM and Saarinen, as well as buildings from the 30s, the 50s, and the mid‐19th century buildings of the early development. There are 20 additional buildings associated with the Glen Helen nature preserve's outdoor education program: Lodging, classrooms, staff housing, maintenance facilities, visitor center, museum, and administrative offices. Currently, the Main Campus structures are undergoing a series of coordinated construction projects under the aegis of tCi in a design build service package. Roofing projects on seven buildings started in September 2009 and include flat roof replacement, structural reinforcement, gutters, downspouts, header boxes, internal drains, deflectors, flashing, underground drains, rainwater harvesting, and sloped roof repairs. Roof coverings are terne, copper, asphalt shingles, and various flat roof membranes and BUR. Brick masonry condition assessments on the three 1853 buildings, and two 1954 buildings, determined problems and effects using both the typical evaluation techniques and NDT; treatments have been defined and costs estimated. The order for the 25,000 hand molded has been placed and masonry restoration contractors have received the construction documents for pricing. Most of the preservation work will occur on the iconic Antioch Hall, a poster child of deferred maintenance and an inappropriate rehabilitation from 1959. The aluminum windows of the rehab will be replaced with wood windows matching the last original examples still in place. The brick project is targeted at between $320,000 and $340,000 inclusive of assessment, design, and construction. The window replacement project is in the same range at $250,000 for the primary windows, $40,000 preservation of the 30 remaining windows, and harmonizing a 1959 entry addition at $35,000. Work is underway on 15 buildings in order to allow the first new class to be accommodated in fall, 2011 and prospective students and their parents to be favorably impressed as they begin visits. Building Evaluation / Preservation the COLLABORATIVE inc. 2080 Pearl Street 1221 Main Ave. Boulder, Colorado 80302 Durango, Colorado 81301 303.442.3601 Fax: 303.449.3666 970.247.1336 Fax: 259.3972 collab@thecollaborativeinc.net City of Boulder Open Space Mountain Parks Flagstaff Mountain Area Boulder, Colorado Continuing a more than 30-year engagement by the City of Boulder, tCi has recently completed preservation plans and specifications, for four historic structures. These were all built in the early third of the 20th century in the teens and 20s by fraternal organizations and the CCC. All were executed in Park rustic style with very large stonemasonry and log structural members. The four buildings were the Halfway House, its associated convenience facility, the Flagstaff Mountain picnic shelter, and the Green Mountain Lodge. These were funded based upon a five- year Master plan for cultural resources in the West TSA that sets forth all of the cultural resources with required work, costs, and phasing. Preservation of Multiple Historic Structures the COLLABORATIVE inc. 2080 Pearl Street 970 East 4th Ave. Boulder, Colorado 80302 Durango, Colorado 81301 303.442.3601 Fax: 449.3666 970.247.1336 Fax: 259.3972 collab@thecollaborativeinc.net National Park Service San Agustin and Santa Elena Bastions, and Associated Fortification Walls San Juan National Historic Park San Juan, Puerto Rico The original construction of the San Juan fortification walls in Puerto Rico dates from the middle of the 16th century. The fortifications were constructed with the single purpose of defending the City of San Juan and its harbor from attack, principally by sea. Over a four- century period of construction and reconstruction, the fortification walls evolved from one construction typology into at least 10 identifiable types. The walls investigated in this study are 750 meters long, range to 15 meters in height, and include two bastions and the San Juan Gate. The challenging task of evaluating such complex structures required the synergism between historic research and modern diagnostic techniques to develop a deep under- standing of the history, materials, and structural behavior of the fortification walls. In addition to historic research, the 21st-century technologies selected to evaluate the walls included laser scans, digital photodocumentation, wall coring, remote visual inspection of the core interior, microwave radar scans, thermography, characterization of stone and mortar types and strength, and finite element modeling. Condition Assessment the COLLABORATIVE inc. 2080 Pearl Street 970 East 4th Ave. Boulder, Colorado 80302 Durango, Colorado 81301 303.442.3601 Fax: 449.3666 970.247.1336 Fax: 259.3972 collab@thecollaborativeinc.net The Best Designs Deserve The Best Design Partners Resume & Bio LS Group provides best-in-class lighting design that elevates any architecture or interior design project. We’re an established, woman-owned lighting design firm that employs a creative, purpose-driven and collaborative approach to lighting and lighting controls. Founded in 2008 in Colorado’s Roaring Fork Valley, we have experience with a wide variety of project types, scales and geographies and are as dedicated to our clients’ success as we are to our own. We’re experienced. Our team offers extensive experience that spans multiple project types including award-winning hotels, modern mixed-use development, tech-forward workplaces, community parks and luxury homes. This expertise allows us to streamline the lighting design process by anticipating challenges and mitigating them before they present themselves. Through disciplined coordination with project partners, we ensure that each project’s lighting design is compatible with the architecture and all supporting systems. We’re technically savvy. We design and implement lighting programs using the latest in new technology and environmentally friendly lighting solutions. We’re versed in energy-efficiency, user wellness, art illumination, audio-visual, lighting control systems and mechanical- electrical coordination. We use advanced software – including Revit – to help visualize the design and more effectively integrate our plans into the project. This highly detailed approach considers the entire lifecycle of the project, with client needs at the forefront of the process. We believe that great results come from the efforts of a great team. From small projects to large ones, including properties with a singular use to those with multiple functions requiring innovative and flexible lighting design, we empower our team members to use their individual creativity and technical strengths to deliver the best outcomes. We understand that projects change, sometimes quickly, and necessitate pivots that can shift the trajectory of the design. We stay flexible, anticipating and embracing changes rather than pushing against them to deliver a final product that exceeds expectations. We respect budgets. We ensure that the lighting and lighting control costs are clearly defined and work to create the most stunning designs while staying within the agreed-upon budget. Our close industry relationships with reputable vendors who are committed to cost transparency translate into high-quality design with zero surprises for our clients. What we ultimately install in the space is exactly what the client expects. We know that business is about relationships. We believe the foundation of good working relationships is built on trust, open communication and delivering on promises. We work tirelessly to make sure that our process is as transparent, collaborative and communicative as possible. COMPANY PROFILE The Best Designs Deserve The Best Design Partners Resume & Bio Sarah is passionate about people. She feels that great projects are not only a result of great design but also of a great team which is made up of personality, dynamic, and timing. She is invested in the success of our projects in their application / end product but also in their ability to build relationships which lead to future successes. Conceptual design is also one of her strengths, she is able to piece together imagery and presentations that convey our concepts elegantly and intentionally. Sarah Erickson Principal / Partner O: 303.573.0059 C: 720.938.2442 Education: University of Colorado at Boulder - B.S. Architectural Engineering - Illumination IALD Professional, Illuminating Engineering Society of North America - Member, WILD Board Elise is genuinely great to work with. She has many strengths that range from conceptual to implementation and her confidence, knowledge, and experience make her a great design partner. She is able to work with all types of people on all types of projects which allows her to ensure that every project is perfected. She is able to redirect finger pointing games by taking initiative and reminding people that there is one goal, a successful project. When aiming art, historically, she will go up and down the ladder 10 times before being happy with the adjustments. Elise Streeb Principal / Partner O: 970.927.5133 C: 970.343.2303 Education: University of Colorado at Boulder - B.S. Architectural Engineering - Illumination IALD Professional, LEED AP TEAM BIOS The Best Designs Deserve The Best Design Partners Resume & Bio Coming from an interior design background, Kristen has style. She has an eye for design that provides unique designs to our clients. Always on the lookout for something innovative, something that has not been done before. She is quick to connect and is very good at presenting her ideas. She is easy to call and have a conversation with, and is always willing to take the extra time to coordinate with the team. Kristen Kordecki Commercial Projects Director O: 303.573.0059 C: 224.392.7452 Education: Illinois Institute of Art - B.F.A. Interior Design Radhika is a vibrant and flexible designer. She thrives in the details, with a background in electrical engineering, she provides a unique perspective into power design. Her exacting eye allows her to provide the highest quality of modeling and specifying to every project. Radhika willingly and intentionally supports all needs of each project with a new perspective and discerning eye. Radhika Kalra Lead Designer O: 303.573.0059 C: 303.999.9015 Education: University of Alberta - B.S. Electrical Engineering Otis College of Art & Design - Lighting Design Certificate Program The Best Designs Deserve The Best Design Partners Resume & Bio Lin has a distinct eye for design. With a background in interior design, he has a taught and very much natural ability to visualize space, materials and lighting for a cohesive and intentional design. His attention to detail ensures our projects are delivered at the LS level of quality. Lin was born into business, working and help- ing in his family’s restaurant. He understands the need for efficiency and accuracy while also being very aware of how customers are helped and treated throughout the process. Lin Pizzo Designer O: 303.573.0059 C: 618.972.2186 Education: Iowa State University - Bachelor of Fine Arts Interior Design Noah is a fluid and collaborative team player through and through. His rare combination of technical savviness and laid-back nature make him integral to process and design development. A creative at heart, Noah brings original and precise ideas to the table both in-house and on projects. Noah Scott Designer O: 303.573.0059 C: 203.572.4323 Education: University of Colorado at Boulder - B.S. Architectural Engineering References The Best Designs Deserve The Best Design Partners The Clayton Members Club Denver, CO The Clayton Members Club & Hotel in Denver’s Cherry Creek North neighborhood introduces a private social club experience centered around diversity and inclusion. The lighting and interior design were intricately interwoven from conception to completion with the goal of fostering community at every turn. LS Group paid close attention to ensuring that the lighting highlighted the materiality and architectural elements within each space, as well as showcased the impressive collection of artwork. Incorporating linear indirect lights, recessed downlights and track lights, the lighting design gives each room a distinct feel while ensuring cohesion throughout the club. Principal / Partner: Sarah Erickson Commercial Projects Director: Kristen Kordecki Project Reference: Matt Cecere, Principal, 4240 Architecture 303.292.3388 St Paul Collection Denver, CO Located in vibrant Cherry Creek North, St Paul Collection boasts a property consisting of two buildings that is graceful, yet bold. The two buildings are meant to tango, positioned diagonally across an intersection from one another, and designed as opposites that attract; one evoking more of a feminine experience while the other brings a touch of masculinity. The lighting design plays off the feminine and masculine nature of each building; where a feminine tone is set with a general ambiance that utilizes indirect lighting, softer lines of light, and glittering gold finishes, in contrast a masculine tone is elicited with general linear slot lighting, square downlights, bold integrated light details, heavier decorative light fixtures, and darker finishes. Principal / Partner: Sarah Erickson Commercial Projects Director: Kristen Kordecki Project Reference: Matt Cecere, Principal, 4240 Architecture 303.292.3388 The Thompson Denver, CO Urban sophistication meets alpine luxury at Denver’s newest boutique Hyatt property, the Thompson Denver. With a prime position in historic Lower Downtown (LoDo) along the city’s famed 16th Street Mall, the hotel aims to serve as a cultural hub for travelers and locals alike. Rooted in an elevated interpretation of the Colorado lifestyle, the interiors team at Parts & Labor Design envisioned an experience that would transport guests from the Mile High City to a luxe chalet in the snow-capped mountains to the west. Principal / Partner: Sarah Erickson Commercial Projects Director: Kristen Kordecki Project Reference: Jessie Johnson, Principal, DLR Group 720.904.0440 The Best Designs Deserve The Best Design Partners Resume & Bio PROJECTS - HOTELS Name Brand Location Size Populus Aparium Denver, CO 135,000 sq ft / 250 key Thompson Denver Hyatt Thompson Denver, CO 160,000 sq ft / 216 key Cottonwood Hotel Kimpton Omaha, NE 170,000 sq ft / 205 key Blake Street Hotel Non-Disclosed Denver, CO 102,000 sq ft / 190 key CatBird Independent Denver, CO 100,000 sq ft / 165 key University Hill Hotel Non-Disclosed Boulder, CO 115,000 sq ft / 187 key Foote’s Rest Hotel Non-Disclosed Frisco, CO 75 key Clayton Member’s Club & Hotel Aparium Denver, CO 91,700 sq ft / 63 key Molly Gibson Lodge Independent Aspen, CO 20,500 sq ft / 68 key Star Metals Hotel Marriott Autograph Atlanta, GA 150 key Hotel Jerome Auberge Aspen, CO 94 key The Elizabeth Hotel Marriott Autograph Ft Collins, CO 118,000 sq ft / 164 key The Curtis Hotel Doubletree by Hilton Denver, CO 336 key Atlanta Perimeter Doubletree by Hilton Atlanta, GA 120 key Chateau Beaver Creek Independent Avon, CO - Limelight Aspen Limelight Aspen, CO 100,000 sq ft / 126 key BVMU Marriot Autograph Denver, CO 235 key Belleview North Tower Residence Inn Denver, CO - Dream Las Vegas Dream Las Vegas, NV 450 key Foote’s Rest Marriott Tribute Frisco, CO 114,000 / 75 key US Air Force Academy Hotel Independent Colrado Springs, CO 250 key Wasatch Peaks Ranch Independent Wasatch Peaks, UT - The Best Designs Deserve The Best Design Partners Resume & Bio PROJECTS - RESTAURANTS Name Location Size Broadway Market Denver, CO 12,000 sq ft 7908 Aspen Aspen, CO 6,000 sq ft Elk Camp Restaurant Snowmass, CO 17,000 sq ft Sierra Lonetree, CO 9,000 sq ft Of A Kind Denver, Colorado 2,000 sq ft Orleans Room Omaha, Nebraska 3,000 sq ft The Committee Chophouse Omaha, Nebraska 3,000 sq ft The Cottonwood Room Omaha, Nebraska 2,000 sq ft Olón Restaurant and Bar Olón Atlantic City, New Jersey 3,000 sq ft Okatshe Atlantic City, New Jersey 2,000 sq ft The Emporium Kitchen & Wine Market Ft Collins, Colorado 4,000 sq ft Magic Rat Ft Collins, Colorado 2,500 sq ft Five Nines Denver, CO 2,000 sq ft Urban Farmer Nashville, TN 5,500 sq ft The Best Designs Deserve The Best Design Partners Hotel Jerome Aspen, Colorado 5, 000 sq ft The Best Designs Deserve The Best Design Partners Cottonwood Hotel Kimpton Omaha, Nebraska 170,000 sq ft / 205 key The Best Designs Deserve The Best Design Partners The Cottonwood Room Omaha, Nebraska 2,000 sq ft The Best Designs Deserve The Best Design Partners Cottonwood Hotel Kimpton Omaha, Nebraska 170,000 sq ft / 205 key The Best Designs Deserve The Best Design Partners Cottonwood Hotel Kimpton Omaha, Nebraska 170,000 sq ft / 205 key The Best Designs Deserve The Best Design Partners Orleans Room Omaha, Nebraska 3,000 sq ft The Best Designs Deserve The Best Design Partners Orleans Room Omaha, Nebraska 3,000 sq ft The Best Designs Deserve The Best Design Partners The Committee Chophouse Omaha, Nebraska 3,000 sq ft The Best Designs Deserve The Best Design Partners Orleans Room Omaha, Nebraska 3,000 sq ft Client:Project: 2023-12-13 LSG_00666QU CCY Architects 228 Midland Ave Basalt, CO 81621 Armory Hall Remodel & Reuse 427 Rio Grande Place Aspen, CO 81611 Armory Hall Remodel & Reuse Contact: 2727 W 2nd Ave Denver, CO 80219 (303) 573-0059 525 Basalt Ave Unit I-300 Basalt, CO 81621 (970) 927-5133 Thank you very much for the opportunity. At LS Group we believe the best designs deserve the best design partners. We listen and focus intently on our client’s needs. We are an approachable, friendly group that collaborates well with any team. We love the design process. Through many years of industry experience, we possess the tools and processes of a seasoned veteran, yet we still have the heart of a startup. Our proven record of success allows our business to thrive from repeat clientele. We are passionate about lighting. We hope to share our passion with you. Client:Project: 2023-12-13 LSG_00666QU CCY Architects 228 Midland Ave Basalt, CO 81621 Armory Hall Remodel & Reuse 427 Rio Grande Place Aspen, CO 81611 Armory Hall Remodel & Reuse Type:Total Square Footage:Design Option: Remodel / Reuse - Historic - Hospitality 19,000 A Inclusions: • Lighting design services for interior FOH spaces, core and shell, site and exterior amenity. • Involvement in monthly coordination calls in SD / DD, twice a month CD coordination meetings and monthly OAC meetings. • Design to project budget. Client to provide LS with a budget prior to Schematic Design. Exclusions • Lighting design for right of way, parking, BOH spaces including but not limited to BOH kitchen, storage, employee areas and storage. • Stamped set, panel design and electrical distribution by others. • RCP dimensions by others. • Illuminance calculations. • Construction circuiting and final wiring requirements by MEP. • Emergency / Exit lighting by MEP, LS to review specification / info as-needed. Final locations by MEP. • Final energy code items by MEP. • Lighting alternates, alternate submittal review, and value engineering. • Travel outside RFV. Enhanced Schematic Design:$6,375.00 Land Use Application & Review:$8,260.00 Design Development:$15,000.00 Construction Documents:$19,800.00 TOTAL $49,435.00 Client:Project: 2023-12-13 LSG_00666QU CCY Architects 228 Midland Ave Basalt, CO 81621 Armory Hall Remodel & Reuse 427 Rio Grande Place Aspen, CO 81611 Armory Hall Remodel & Reuse KICK-OFF MEETING Meeting to review initial design items with team including, thoughts regarding lighting design intent. $300.00 SCHEMATIC DESIGN General concept imagery for defined spaces. $5,000.00 INITIAL SCHEMATIC DESIGN CHARRETTE Initial review of Schematic Design package with design team. $275.00 REVISED SCHEMATIC DESIGN Revised general concept imagery for defined spaces. $600.00 FINAL SCHEMATIC DESIGN CHARRETTE Review Schematic Design package with ownership. Review concepts and choose items to move forwa rd into Design Development. $200.00 All Design fees described above estimated fees, billed on an hourly as-needed basis, not to be exceeded without prior approval. Enhanced Schematic Design:$6,375.00 CONSULTANT COORDINATION Coordination meetings for land use permitting. $1,000.00 LAND USE #1 Land Use lighting plans, specifications and schedules. $4,000.00 LAND USE #2 Revised Land Use lighting plans, specifications and schedules. $2,500.00 LAND USE #3 (FINAL) Final Land Use lighting plans, specifications and schedules. $760.00 All Design fees described above estimated fees, billed on an hourly as-needed basis, not to be exceeded without prior approval. Land Use Application & Review:$8,260.00 Client:Project: 2023-12-13 LSG_00666QU CCY Architects 228 Midland Ave Basalt, CO 81621 Armory Hall Remodel & Reuse 427 Rio Grande Place Aspen, CO 81611 Armory Hall Remodel & Reuse DD LIGHTING CONTROL Conceptual circuiting and control intent schedule. $2,700.00 PROGRESS DESIGN DEVELOPMENT Progress Design Development lighting plans and schedules. $6,000.00 DESIGN DEVELOPMENT Design Development lighting plans, specifications, and schedules. $6,100.00 DD/PRICING REVIEW Review Design Development documentation and initial budget with team. $200.00 All Design fees described above are top set fees and will not be exceeded. Design Development:$15,000.00 CD COORDINATION MEETINGS Consultant coordination meetings. $1,000.00 CD LIGHTING CONTROL Conceptual circuiting and control intent schedule. $3,200.00 PROGRESS CONSTRUCTION DOCUMENTS Progress Construction Document lighting plans and schedules. $7,800.00 CONSTRUCTION DOCUMENTS 100% Construction Document lighting plans, specifications, detail coordination, and schedules. $7,800.00 All Design fees described above are top set fees and will not be exceeded. Construction Documents:$19,800.00 Client:Project: 2023-12-13 LSG_00666QU CCY Architects 228 Midland Ave Basalt, CO 81621 Armory Hall Remodel & Reuse 427 Rio Grande Place Aspen, CO 81611 Armory Hall Remodel & Reuse 1. The scope of work listed herein constitutes normal design services and is not necessarily intended to be all inclusive for services rendered on this project. Additional design services may occur when changes beyond the scope of services listed herein are required or requested for this project. Any exterior lighting design provided will be code compliant. All additional design services will be billed at hourly rates herein. Major changes beyond the control of LS may include, but are not limited to significant changes to project design, change in ownership, changes or additions to permitted / code compliant design, and alternate submittal review. 2. LS carries commercial general liability, professional liability, umbrella liability, and worker’s compensation insurance. Insurance certificate available upon request. 3. All invoices are due based on terms provided on invoice. LS reserves the right to stop work after invoices are 30 days past due. Invoices exceeding 30 days past due may be subject to finance charges. In the event that LS prevails in any legal action (including, but not limited to, litigation) regarding collection of unpaid bills or enforcement of any part of this contract, LS shall be entitled to recover from the Client all legal fees (including, but not limited to, costs and reasonable attorney’s fees). Should work by LS be terminated at any time on this project, LS shall be compensated for the work performed prior to the termination date. Should the project be suspended for any period of time exceeding 3 months, or terminated completely, LS shall be compensated for the work performed prior to the date of issuance of such suspension and/or termination. Should the project be resumed after an extended hiatus exceeding 3 months, LS reserves the right to review and renegotiate the design fees and contract. 4. LS is being contracted as a lighting design consultant and does not assume responsibility for the performance, errors, and/or omissions of the Project Team, Client, General Contractor, or Electrical Contractor. LS does not assume responsibility for the processes of construction, fabrica-tion,purchasing, shipping, delivery, or installation, and for the performance, errors, and/or omissions of the Project Team or Client’s employees, fabricators, distributors, and/or shippers of equipment. LS will not be responsible for any materials, shipping or restocking fees due to changes in the field by the Project Team or Client. 5. LS does not include fees for professional engineer stamps. Project electrical engineer and / or architect to include LS drawings in stamped set. Electrical code compliance to be reviewed by others. 6. At the conclusion of the project, and subject to the prior written approval of the Client, in the Client’s sole discretion, LS shall be granted the right to use all documentation of the project including but not limited to photographs, renderings, plans, and specifications for representation of work completed as part of LS professional portfolio both on the LS website and in other promotional material including but not limited to award submission, featured articles, and advertising. LS shall be credited as the Lighting Consultant in any publications or published material incorpo-rating depictions of their work. Upon the prior written approval of the Client, in the Client’s sole discretion, LS shall be granted permission to photograph the interior and exterior of the project before and after completion. It is understood that LS shall respect the complete anonymity and confidentiality of the Client and all parties involved herein. Client:Project: 2023-12-13 LSG_00666QU CCY Architects 228 Midland Ave Basalt, CO 81621 Armory Hall Remodel & Reuse 427 Rio Grande Place Aspen, CO 81611 Armory Hall Remodel & Reuse BILLING The contract will be phase and/or hourly as-needed billed based on project work completion. Billing type (set fee / hourly) is outlined per the contract deliverables previously stated. Hourly billing rates are outlined below. RATES Designer - $150.00 Lead Designer - $195.00 Director - $225.00 Principal / Partner - $275.00 REIMBURSABLES Copies, printing and Plotting: Standard sized printing and copies will be billed at $1.00/sheet. All other reimbursable charges will be billed at cost including but not limited to large scale plots, large scale copies, color copies etc. Travel: Travel outside of a 5 mile radius of our Denver / Basalt Office locations will be billed as outlined below. Any contract Estimate or Add/Alt is subject to change based on availability and market rates. - Mileage will be billed at current IRS standard mileage rates. - Reimbursable travel time will be billed at 0.5 times the hourly rates provided above. - Travel expenses including but not limited to airfare, meals, lodging, ride share, parking fees, rental cars etc. will be billed at direct cost. Miscellaneous: Couriers, freight, samples, and postage will be billed at direct cost. Client:Project: 2023-12-13 LSG_00666QU CCY Architects 228 Midland Ave Basalt, CO 81621 Armory Hall Remodel & Reuse 427 Rio Grande Place Aspen, CO 81611 Armory Hall Remodel & Reuse Client Signature Printed Name Date Billing Address Billing Email Billing Contact Draw / Billing Date Special Billing Requests / Notes LS Group Signature Printed Name Date THANK YOU CCY ARCHITECTS Todd Kennedy, AIA - Partner | tkennedy@ccyarchitects.com Rich Carr, AIA - Partner | rcarr@ccyarchitects.com www.ccyarchitects.com Architecture & Engineering Design Team for Armory Hall Remodel & Reuse Project # 2023-404 CITY OF ASPEN, COLORADO City of Aspen 427 Rio Grande Place Aspen, CO 81611 (970)920-5000 www.cityofaspen.com Proposals Due: December 18, 2023, 2:00PM Armory Hall Request for Proposals - Architect/Design Services REQUEST FOR PROPOSALS Sealed proposals will be received at the City of Aspen Purchasing office, through the Bidnet Direct website (www.bidnetdirect.com) until 2:00pm, December 18, 2023, at which time the proposals will be opened and reviewed, for the following City of Aspen project: 2023-404 Architecture & Engineering Design Team for Armory Hall. The City of Aspen (“City”) is in the initial steps of a design process for the remodel and reuse of Armory Hall, the former city hall (“Project”). This Request for Proposals (“RFP”) primarily seeks proposals for Architecture & Engineering (“A&E”) design team services in developing the Project. As currently conceived, the Project includes the redevelopment of the building to ensure that it becomes a vital community hub in downtown Aspen. To that end, an operations study will be key to this project and should be immediately undertaken as it will directly inform the design process. Additional design considerations include program development and sensitivities related to historic preservation, the building’s relation to an adjacent pocket park, energy efficiency & sustainability. There will be a non-mandatory, virtual pre-bid conference at 10AM on Tuesday, November 14, 2023. A second, non-mandatory, virtual clarification meeting has been added on Wednesday, November 29th at 10:30 am. Request for site visits can be made until Dec. 4th via email project manager jennifer.phelan@aspen.gov Complete RFP documents are available to download at www.bidnetdirect.com. Candidates must be registered to view the bid packages. There is no fee to register. Call 1-800-835-4603 if you need assistance registering. Proposals must be submitted by uploading to the Bidnet Direct website. The City reserves the right to reject any or all Proposals or accept what is, in its judgment, the Proposal which is in the City's best interest. The City further reserves the right, in the best interests of the City, to accept a late submittal or to waive any technical defects or irregularities in any and all Proposals submitted. Pursuant to the Colorado Open Records Act, C.R.S. Section 24-72-200.1 (CORA), any and all of the documents that are submitted to the City of Aspen may be deemed public records subject to examination and inspection by third parties. The City of Aspen reserves the right, at its sole discretion, to release for inspection or copying any document, plan, specification, proposal or other writing submitted pursuant to this request. Candidates should identify any portion of their proposals which they consider confidential. Discussion may be conducted with responsible Offerors who submit Proposals determined to be reasonably susceptible to be selected for award for purpose of clarification to assure full understanding of, and responsiveness to the solicitation requirements. In addition to price, the evaluation criteria set forth in the RFP shall be considered in judging which Proposal is in the best interest of the City. Armory Hall Request for Proposals - Architect/Design Services City of Aspen 427 Rio Grande Place Aspen, CO 81611 Table of Contents 1.0 Introduction 3 1.1 Invitation to Proposers 3 1.2 Project Summary___ 3 1.3 Project Approach 4 2.0 Project Description 6 2.1 Process Summary 6 2.2 Project Site 6 2.3 Programming Expectations 7 2.4 Technical Studies 8 3.0 Scope of Services 9 3.1 Part 1: Enhanced Schematic Design_______________________________________________ 9 3.2 Part 2: Support for the Land Use Application and review process_______________________ 9 3.3 Part 3: Design Development_____________________________________________________10 3.4 Part 4: Approval Documents - recordation support__________________________________ 10 3.5 Part 5: Construction Documents_________________________________________________ 10 3.6 Part 6: Support for the Building Permit Application Process___________________________ 11 3.7 Part 7: Construction Administration______________________________________________ 11 3.8 Part 8: Project Closeout and Warranty Support_____________________________________ 11 4.0 RFP Process 11 4.1 Questions 11 4.2 RFP Schedule 12 4.3 Proposal Submission and Format_________________________________________________ 12 4.4 Evaluation Criteria_____________________________________________________________12 5.0 Proposal Requirements 12 5.1 Qualifications 12 5.2 Proposal Elements 13 5.3 Proposal Format 15 6.0 Owner’s Language 15 6.1 Interests of the City of Aspen 15 6.2 Insurance Requirements 15 7.0 Exhibits 15 7.1 Contracts 15 Armory Hall Request for Proposals - Architect/Design Services 1.0 Introduction The purpose of this Request for Proposals (RFP) document is to solicit complete architectural design and related service proposals from qualified firms or teams for the Armory Hall project. 1.1 Invitation to Proposers Sealed proposals will be received at the City of Aspen Purchasing office, through the Bidnet Direct website (www.bidnetdirect.com) until 2:00pm, Monday, December 18, 2023, at which time the proposals will be opened and reviewed, for the following City of Aspen project: 2023-404 Armory Hall Remodel & Reuse To allow the City of Aspen (Owner) to fully understand your firm or team’s intended approach to the project, carefully prepare a response based on the information required in this Request for Proposals. 1.2 Project Summary The City of Aspen desires to develop a mixed-use project within Armory Hall (Armory) located at 130 S. Galena Street, the former city hall. Based on public engagement conducted in 2022, the potential uses identified by the public include: casual dining, multi-purpose space, community center, lower price point retail, and social services. Additionally, City Council discussed utilization of part of this space for the Aspen Chamber Resort Association (ACRA), a visitor center, and a meeting space; however, the building contains finite area and it is expected that future programming will need to be prioritized due to both the size of the space and to ensure the programming of the building has the best chance to create a vibrant space. Consultants are currently developing concepts for the building by ‘test fitting’ a mix of uses to determine what can be reasonably accommodated based on the space needs of different uses inclusive of front of house, back of house, circulation, and other requirements. It is anticipated that the Aspen City Council will provide direction on what uses should be prioritized within the building in mid-November, to move the project forward. Once programming direction is provided, further development of the mixed-use concept can be undertaken. Specifically, any design team needs to undertake an operational study to ensure that any uses programmed into the building have adequate space or are ‘right sized’ and properly located within the footprint of the building to be successful in the Aspen market and ensure a mix of uses that will contribute to an energetic, social space. The requirements of the operations study are further defined later in this narrative (section 3.1). Key to any design is maintaining building flexibility for changes to programming in the future to meet shifting community needs. As a historically designated structure, rehabilitation of the building will be necessary and any exterior design changes will need to be sensitive to the historic building and surrounding context. Additionally, any suggested landscape improvements to connect Conner Memorial Park and the outdoor areas on the Armory lot with the building will require compatibility with Parks and Open Space standards and collaboration with the Parks department. The initial contract award for this RFP will include only Parts 1-5 as categorized below and described in Section 3.0 Scope of Services. Additional portions of scope are anticipated to be added as additional services as the project moves forward. Part 1: Enhanced Schematic Design (initial contract award) Part 2: Support for the Land Use Application and review process (initial contract award) Part 3: Design Development (initial contract award) Armory Hall Request for Proposals - Architect/Design Services Part 4: Approval Documents recordation support (initial contract award) Part 5: Construction Documents (initial contract award) Part 6: Support for the Building Permit Application Process (future add services) Part 7: Construction Administration (future add services) Part 8: Project Closeout and Warranty Support (future add services) It should be noted that during the design process, the City may issue an RFQ for Public-Private Partnership (“PPP”) development and financing interest near the end of the SD design phase. This approach is still to be determined but regardless of that decision point, the city anticipates continuing on a redevelopment path with a 2026 construction start date for this important community building. 1.3 Project Approach Design and program a remodel and potential addition of the Armory building, respecting its historic character and key features as well as the surrounding neighborhood. Staff is expecting direction in mid-November on both the recommended uses for programming the building and its footprint. Currently the +/- 19,000 sq. ft. building includes a basement and three stories. When constructed in 1892, the building was two stories: the existing ground floor with a mezzanine feature and the current third floor. In the 1970s, the mezzanine level was filled in, creating a new second story, while the elevator was installed in the 1980s and basement was constructed in the 1990s. It is anticipated that the present second story will be removed, taking the building back to its original above ground condition but reducing the square footage of the building by +/-5,000 sq. ft.. To gain back square footage, Council may direct staff to pursue a new addition. The area along the alley on the north side of the building is the only location a new structure can be located. Any new structure will need to meet the city’s design guidelines as the Armory is historically designated and is located within a historic district. A successful design team should develop a sustainable and energy efficient building that meets accessibility and current City of Aspen building code requirements, allows for the building to be remodeled in a timely manner, and proactively encourages connectivity to the adjacent park and outdoor spaces. The design should consider the building’s flexibility over time as this building is intended to be a community hub and needs may change in the future. Additionally, any design team should develop a project that meets the guiding principles that were adopted via Council resolution to assist in steering decisions related to the project: •The building remodel will incorporate sustainable systems showing a commitment to the environment. •The Armory should be able to be used by a diverse range of people. •The uses within the Armory should provide meaningful and affordable participation in programs and offerings. •The operational structure of the Armory should limit the public financial burden of operating and maintaining the building. •The remodel will respect the historic context and contribute to Aspen’s small-town character. •The programming of the Armory should contribute to a lively and diverse downtown. •The programming at the Armory should focus on unmet needs within the community. 1.3.A Objectives. Proposers shall include on their team firms or individuals qualified and licensed in the State of Colorado, and significantly familiar with City of Aspen building codes, amendments, and processes, to provide professional design or consulting services in the following disciplines: Armory Hall Request for Proposals - Architect/Design Services •The design of a mixed-use building that will likely have some form of food service (food hall/ café/ food trucks). The team should propose connectivity ideas between the building, any on-site space, and Conner Memorial Park, but the actual design of any of those elements will be executed by the Parks Department. •Interior design for finishes •HVAC and mechanical engineering •Construction cost estimation •Historic resource design and rehabilitation •Structural engineering •Financial and operational assessments •Commercial operations •Land Use •Public engagement •Other disciplines that can enhance delivery of the project’s objectives 1.3.B Collaborative Project Delivery. The City will pursue a collaborative project development team. The early formation of the group provides an open and collaborative process involving input from all parties – designers understand the ramifications of decisions when they are made, decisions are not made solely on a first-cost basis, time value design (estimated budgeting) allows for cost feedback and early total project cost commitments. The values we are looking for on this team are as follows: •Mutual respect and trust •Mutual benefit and reward •Collaborative innovation and decision making •Early involvement of key participants •Early goal definition •Comprehensive Planning •Open communication •Appropriate technology •Organization and leadership The collaborative project team will consist of the following: •City of Aspen staff •Architect and design team •General contractor will be brought on board during schematic design •Owners’ representative will be brought on board during schematic design •Commissioning agent when construction is ready to be undertaken 1.3.C Anticipated Schedule. A tentatively proposed project schedule is as follows: •Anticipated finalization of contract award: January, 2024 •Enhanced schematic: January 2024 – May 2024 •Operations study: January 2024 – May 2024 •Design Development/Land Use Process: June 2024 – November 2024 •Recordation of Approval documents: December 2024 •Final Design CD: October 2024 – December 2024 Armory Hall Request for Proposals - Architect/Design Services •Permits submission and review: January - December 2025 •Construction start 2026 2.0 Project Description 2.1 Project Summary The City of Aspen wishes to develop a mixed-use project within Armory Hall, a building that formerly housed city hall. The 131 year-old building is approximately 19,000 square feet in size and sits at the corner of South Galena Street and East Hopkins Avenue. It is anticipated that the current second story that began as a mezzanine level in the 1800s and was filled in over time, will be removed. This does not preclude the introduction of additional square footage within the original footprint if it makes sense. Circulation for the building will also need to be evaluated to meet building code and ensure efficiency and appropriate sizing. City Council may also request development of an addition, to maximize the building’s square footage and compensate for the removal of the second story. Any new addition to the building may be located along the north side of the Armory. The initial contract award for this RFP will include only Parts 1 - 5 as categorized below in Section 3.0. Additional portions of scope are anticipated to be added as additional services as the project moves forward. 2.2 Project Site The subject building site is a 9,000 sq. ft. lot described as Lots K, L and M, Block 93, City and Townsite of Aspen that has street frontage along S. Galena Street and E. Hopkins Avenue, the former being the primary frontage and access to the building. Conner Memorial Park is 8,250 sq. ft, legally described as Lots N, O and the west 22.5 feet of P, Block 93, City and Townsite of Aspen, that has frontage along E. Hopkins Ave. Together, both properties contain 17,250 sq. ft. It appears Armory Hall is built the full 90 feet along E. Hopkins Ave and the egress well on the east side of the building sits within the park. City staff will have a better idea of the design allowances and limitations associated with this feature by the start of the project. Figure 1: Vicinity Map Armory Hall Request for Proposals - Architect/Design Services Figure 2: Armory Hall Site Detail (circa 2013) 2.3 Programming Expectations The city expects to redevelop the site based on the use and design direction provided by City Council at their November 13, 2023, work session. At that meeting, it is anticipated that City Council will identify the uses and design parameters that will need to be incorporated into the project. The design should appeal to a broad segment of the local community, providing an intergenerational destination, and ensure for an enjoyable and lively patron experience. Armory Hall Request for Proposals - Architect/Design Services Any successful project should take into consideration the public engagement that has previously been undertaken, the history associated with building, and the local community as the building moves into a new era. An archive of documents integral to this project can be viewed at Aspen Community Voice: https://www.aspencommunityvoice.com/aspen-armory-hall inclusive of a history paper and engagement reports as well as Council work session memos that show existing building conditions and some initial footprint concepts for the Armory. 2.3.A. Building program. Armory Hall is a historically designated 131-year old building with a rich history steeped in community use. Any design should respect its historic past but incorporate design solutions to allow flexibility for programming changes to meet community expectations for the next 50 years. Rehabilitation of the building exterior, as necessary, should be incorporated into the project scope. Circulation, HVAC and mechanical systems need to be assessed and updated to meet future programming expectations and building code. The building: •must have code compliant ADA access. •must consider efficient circulation for the building, both stairs and elevator, as well as the type of elevator needed based on identified/ future programming. •must consider flexibility in design to accommodate programming changes over time. •must consider necessary structural improvements that must be made to the building. •must consider food preparation, delivery, storage, and accessory space needs if a restaurant use (inclusive of food trucks) is desired. •Must consider needs of the Aspen Saturday Market in any redevelopment scenario (i.e.: bathroom access, power, etc.). 2.3.B. Outdoor space. •The outdoor space on the Armory lot should be an amenity to whatever uses are programmed into the building. Currently, some of the site is used for off-street parking and will need to be considered in light of the uses that are proposed for the building, the circulation needs for those uses, and the requirements of the land use code. •Any suggested connectivity improvements between the Armory lot and the park will be vetted through the Parks Department. •The Parks Department will design any landscape improvements to Conner Memorial Park and the Armory lot so collaboration between the consultant and the Parks Department is required. 2.3.D Permitting requirements. Typical Aspen land use process, building permit application and review process, where multiple departments and districts, such as the Aspen Fire district review the application. The land use process will include review in a public hearing setting, by multiple boards. 2.4 Technical Studies It is assumed a Level 1 Traffic Impact Analysis (TIA) will be required as part of the land use application submission. Additional information on the requirements of the TIA can be found at https://www.aspen.gov/DocumentCenter/View/2208/TIA-Guidelines?bidId= As a historic structure, Mills + Schnoering Architects completed a conditions assessment of the building. This information should be used in developing a rehabilitation plan for the structure and is provided as an exhibit. Armory Hall Request for Proposals - Architect/Design Services 3.0 Scope of Services 3.1 Part 1: Enhanced Schematic Design The Part 1 Enhanced Schematic Design scope is meant to first test out a minimum of two initial designs that can accommodate the required programming. Once a design path is chosen, the goal is to prepare sufficient schematic design documentation to support the land use entitlements application and process. The proposal should include advancement of the technical studies needed to support the SD level of design completion. A priority and front-end component of Part 1 should be an operations study, to evaluate the operating costs associated with running the building as well as recommendations on different operating models. The study should enable City Council to evaluate what operating model makes the most sense for the city and greater community based on the projected return on investment and any subsidy that may be required to operate the building. The study should include sizing and location recommendations for the different uses to succeed in the Aspen market but also provide comparable examples. An add alternate to be included in the bid should be for a study component specific to the operating needs of a restaurant or food hall concept in the Aspen market. Besides the sizing and location recommendation noted previously, the add alternate should evaluate the most likely operational structure for the restaurant (one vendor vs. individual vendors, shared back of house vs. individual back of house) to be successful. Additionally, the add alternate should evaluate and make recommendations on how a restaurant use can provide an affordable food product, inclusive of the need for subsidy and how to measure affordability over time. One public engagement event with the community is anticipated for this project stage. Coordination with the city’s communications department to build upon outreach that has already been undertaken is necessary. At a minimum, the team should expect to coordinate one engagement session to discuss and receive feedback on the two designs and results of the operations study prior to review by City Council. Two work sessions, one to get direction on the two options and a final for schematic approval with City Council should be anticipated to determine a final path for submitting a land use application and gaining entitlements. Assume the following public meetings to support the Enhanced Schematic Design process: •1 Mass email effort •1 Advertising effort (radio, paper and social media) •1 Online Survey, including prep, posting, publishing results •1 In-Person Outreach Event, approx. 3 hours plus prep and display materials •1 Outreach Summary Report Assume the following Public Meetings to Support the Enhanced Schematic Design Process: •Assume two (2) City Council work session public meetings in the SD effort 3.2 Part 2: Support for the Land Use Application and review process In preparing the land use application, the Part 2 scope described here is meant to fill the detail gap to the extent needed to fulfill the requirements as described in the Aspen Municipal Code to submit a land use application. This is for the purpose of preparing the application for submittal and for supporting the development review and approval process. It is anticipated that a consultant will lead the development of the application and be the application lead in the review process. Armory Hall Request for Proposals - Architect/Design Services It is anticipated that the SD deliverables will fall somewhat short of sufficient detail for the land use application. Filling the detail gap in this manner is proposed for time efficiency, rather than running through an entire DD process to reach the level of detail needed to submit the initial land use application. It will be important for the consultant to work on additional design detail necessary during Part 1 to maintain a timely schedule. During the land use review process, architect will lead the design team to coordinate responses to questions and comments from one meeting to the next throughout the review process, through completion. Depending upon the quality, completeness, level of regulatory compliance and community uptake of the application submitted, this process can require numerous iterations to reach completion. Assume the following Public Meetings to Support the Land Use Entitlements Process: • Assume 3 Public Meetings with City Council • Assume 4 Public Meetings with the Historic Preservation Commission Assume each public meeting shall consist of one 2-3 hour in-person meeting. Include preparation for presentation and staff as appropriate. Please review the requirements in code chapter 26.445, Planned Development, and estimate the level of effort needed to fill the gap as described and to produce exhibits as needed for the land use application. Also estimate the time needed to support the land use review process. These deliverables will be in addition to typical SD deliverables and should be customized for the application. 3.3 Part 3: Design Development It is anticipated that the DD process should begin immediately after the land use application is accepted by the City of Aspen Community Development Department. The Part 3 Design Development scope consists of typical AIA DD Scope of Work as per Article 3 of the attached contract. An additional presentation to Aspen City Council will be necessary during this part of the process to continue to seek approval as the designs are advanced and as more information about the project is made available. Weekly project team meetings and additional follow-up meetings to support the DD process should also be anticipated. 3.4 Part 4: Approval Documents- recordation support After the project has been approved by the required boards and commissions, it will be necessary to begin Part 4 and produce the documentation to memorialize the site-specific approval. Such documentation typically requires production and recording of the approved site and landscape plan, representative architectural drawings, as well as initial engineering which will memorialize the approved project. 3.5 Part 5: Construction Documents The Part 5 Construction Documents scope consists of typical AIA CD Scope of Work and Bidding and Negotiation Services as per Article 3 of the attached contract. Assume landscape sheets and details will be provided by the Parks department. For Parts 1-5, an add alternate should be included to design an addition to the building, as described earlier in the narrative, for each phase of work. Armory Hall Request for Proposals - Architect/Design Services 3.6 Part 6: Support for the Building Permit Application Process Preparation of CD documentation should be aimed specifically at satisfying the building permit application process and should include production of ALL BUILDING PERMIT APPLICATION MATERIALS required for building permit application submittal. Information about the building permit application requirements and process are available at the City of Aspen website. The architect shall perform the building permit application submittal process through the required regulatory application process. Architect shall work toward final acceptance of all building permit application materials by such regulatory department staff. During the regulatory review process, architect will lead the A&E design team to coordinate responses to regulatory questions and comments throughout the regulatory review process, through completion and issuance of building permits. Depending upon the quality, completeness, and level of regulatory compliance of the application materials submitted, this process can require numerous iterations to reach completion. 3.7 Part 7: Construction Administration Weekly project team meetings and additional follow-up meetings to support the design effort should be anticipated. The Part 7 CA scope consists of typical AIA CA Scope of Work and Bidding and Negotiation Services as per Article 3 of the attached contract. 3.8 Part 8: Project Closeout and Warranty Support The Part 8 Project Completion scope consists of typical AIA CA Scope of Work and Bidding and Negotiation Services as per Article 3 of the attached contract, however it is anticipated that a 2-year warranty period will be necessary and that support for ongoing warranty issues will be required throughout the warranty process. Project team meetings would only occur occasionally and would be scheduled in an ad hoc manner during this time. 4.0 RFP Process Sealed proposals will be received at the City of Aspen Purchasing office, through the Bidnet Direct website (www.bidnetdirect.com) until 2:00pm, December 18, 2023, at which time the proposals will be opened and reviewed, for the following City of Aspen project: 2023-404 Architecture & Engineering Design Team for Armory Hall. The selection process will consist of proposal evaluations by the selection committee, and Proposers will be notified ofdsfd further process thereafter. In addition to price, the evaluation criteria set forth below may be considered in judging which Proposal is in the best interests of the City. 4.1 Questions Candidates should post pertinent questions on the Bidnet Direct website, www.bidnetdirect.com, no later than December 4, 2023. Answers will be posted online for all Candidates to review. It is the Candidate’s responsibility to check the website for Q&As, addendums, RFP Clarifications, and other important information. A non-mandatory, virtual pre-bid meeting is optional. Use the following link to join the pre-bid conference call on Tuesday, November 14, 2023, at 10:00 am. https://www.microsoft.com/en-us/microsoft-teams/join-a-meeting?rtc=1Meeting ID:259 808 344 64 Passcode: 5qwhSH Armory Hall Request for Proposals - Architect/Design Services A second, non-mandatory, virtual clarification meeting has been added. Use the following link to join the meeting on Wednesday, November 29th at 10:30 amhttps://teams.microsoft.com/l/meetup-join/19%3ameeting_YWY5ZDA3NWUtZTY2NC00ZmEwLTg3NzQtNDdjOTBhZmUwYWVk%40thread.v2/0?context=%7b%22Tid%22%3a%22c4570712-a4ca-4c34-bc07-8437c5f0c65e%22%2c%22Oid%22%3a%229cca6278-de9d-4f80-a9f9-c7ae49f1c64d%22%7d Meeting ID: 272 151 466 133 Passcode: tfPLsh Request for site visits can be made until Dec. 4th via email project manager jennifer.phelan@aspen.gov 4.2 RFP Schedule At this time, the following process and timeline is anticipated. The City reserves the right to modify the process or time l ine: RFP Issued Pre-Bid Conference RFP Clarification meeting Questions Close Proposal Due Intent of Award by October 30, 2023 November 14, 2023, 10:00AM November 29, 2023, 10:30AM December 4, 2023 11:59PM December 18, 2023, 2:00PM mid- January 2024 4.3 Proposal Submission and Format Electronic submission is to be uploaded on the Bidnet Direct website, www.bidnetdirect.com. The electronic submission must be compiled into a single PDF document plus an unprotected Excel workbook of hourly rates, hours and fees. Please reduce file size to the extent possible. The name of the documents must contain the City project number and firm’s name. Proposals are due by: 2:00pm, December 18, 2023. 4.4 Evaluation Criteria The City of Aspen reserves the right to select the proposer that it deems, in its sole discretion, to have presented a proposal that is in the best interests of the City of Aspen. In addition to price, the evaluation criteria and weightings listed below may be considered in judging which Proposal is in the best interests of the City of Aspen and are subject to change by the selection committee based on the best interests of the City of Aspen: 30% Response to section 5.1 Lead Firm and Team Qualifications 30% Response to section 5.2 Relevant Project Experience 10% Response to section 5.3 Additional Expertise Sought 30% Response to section 5.4 Proposed Hours and Fees, Schedule, Contract, Insurance 5.0 Proposal Requirements 5.1 Qualifications Firms/teams responding to this RFP must show organizational and financial capability on similar projects. 5.1.A Overview of the Firm/Team. Please provide the following items: 1)Please provide your firm’s qualifications. 2)Please provide a description of your firm’s financial history including: •Whether your organization is in the process of filing or has filed bankruptcy within the last five years. •A letter from you firm’s financial institution noting your firm’s financial stability. 5.1.B Relevant Team Experience. Please provide a list of projects relevant to the program described in this RFP and include the following information: •Size and dollar value of each project. •Contact person and phone number for the Owner and Contractor, or other relevant references for each. Armory Hall Request for Proposals - Architect/Design Services •Relevant project experience focused on similar recent municipal and historical structure projects. •Emphasis on projects located in a mountainous setting, specifically projects in Aspen and/or Pitkin County. •Emphasis on projects that include a historic resource. •Familiarity and experience with sustainable design (including LEED certification and Net Zero design). •Detailed outline of project scope as well as your firm’s specific scope of services provided. •Identify if your firm was the Design Architect or Architect of Record for each of the relevant projects listed. 5.1.C Design Capabilities. Please describe in detail the firm/team’s overall design capabilities as they relate to each phase of the process. 5.1.D In-House Personnel Dedicated to the Project. Present the qualifications of the in-house design team leader and the design team members as follows: •Proposed role and decision-making capabilities for this project. •Current resume. •List of projects completed by this individual including specific scope of work. •Owner and General Contractor contact person and phone number for each project listed. •Key qualifications that make this individual an ideal fit for this project. •Number of hours per week this individual will be dedicated to this project during the design phase (you may refer to section 5.2.C). •Number of hours per week this individual will be dedicated to this project during the construction phase (you may refer to section 5.2.C). 5.1.E Consultants/Engineers. Please list all proposed consultants & engineers referenced in the fee worksheet. Summarize the work the firm will contribute to the project and how each consultant/engineer is a value add to this specific project. For each consultant/engineer, include the following information: •Firm Name •Address •Contact Name, Phone Number & Email Address •Firm’s Website Address 5.2 Proposal Elements 5.2.A Acknowledgement of Scope of Services. 1)Please summarize/verify your understanding of the scope of services requested in this RFP as well as described in the contract. 2)Describe how your firm/team will approach and execute each section of the scope of services and describe how your firm/team can add value to the services requested to create a successful project. 3)Please also describe what elements of efficiency your firm/team will bring to the project approach in order to help the City of Aspen best utilize funds and make suggestions in each area of the approach on what your firm will do to ensure that the intended outcomes of the project methodology are reached. 5.2.B Fee Worksheet. 1)Fees: Please complete the included fee worksheet. In doing so, please submit lump sum fees to provide the services requested by phase as categorized in the fee worksheet. 2)Reimbursables: Clearly identify all categories of reimbursable expenses, their proposed percentage of markup, and anticipated cost. Use comments as needed. Armory Hall Request for Proposals - Architect/Design Services The Owner expects to include the reimbursable amount proposed in the final design contract as a top-set to be billed against. Candidates are to assume detailed backup of reimbursable costs will be required with each invoice. 5.2.C Detailed Schedule. 1)Prepare a detailed suggested schedule, based on the design process, that will meet the constraints described in section 1.3.C. and describe the level of effort of each individual or role throughout each phase of the schedule and how, in each phase, your firm/team will integrate with the team. 2)Please illustrate the billing rates associated with each individual or role and the amount of effort by each so that it will be clear how the overall pricing in the fee worksheet has been built up to reach the total for the proposal. 5.2.D Design Process Coordination / Quality Control. Describe how your firm/team will coordinate work during each phase of the schedule and what your firm/team will do to ensure quality. Include the amount of travel and frequency of on and off-site meetings and conference calls suggested for the project. 5.2.E Additional Requirements. In addition to the scope of services described in this RFP, be sure that the proposal also addresses the following: 1)The City of Aspen requires that the selected firm/teamwork as part of the Design team to develop an efficient, sustainable design that exists in harmony with its surrounding environment and shall meet the functional and constructability requirements of a properly completed project. 2)The design team is expected to support the construction cost estimating effort as needed with the General Contractor, Owner’s Agent and Commissioning Agent throughout the design process. 3)During each phase of the design process, the design team will be responsible for presenting the project design to City of Aspen stakeholder groups and Aspen City Council. The intent of these stakeholder sessions will be to provide updates and to receive (and to incorporate to the extent possible within the City’s goals and objectives) feedback about the project’s design. Specify in your proposal what level of sketches, renderings, graphics or modeling your proposal includes at each phase and describe how each will be sufficient for presentation at each phase. 4)The design team will be responsible, along with the Contractor at Risk and Owner’s Agent, for presenting documentation that supports the Contractor’s GMP bid for the project to Aspen City Council. 5)Your firm should assume general responsibility for all aspects of sustainable design. 6)The selected firm will be required to execute and perform work subject to the attached AIA B132 form of agreement between the Owner and Architect. Please make the necessary arrangements with your legal and insurance teams to accommodate this request. The contract documents included provide a working framework for the overall project approach and should be considered part of the scope of work required by this RFP while recognizing that changes to the document may be requested by both parties and negation will be required to finalize the contract language. 7)Please provide the maximum square footage associated with designing the remodel of the existing Armory building associated with the bid. Include the square footage associated with the add alternate of designing a new addition to the building. All contents of proposals received are in the public domain and all material is likely to be published in recommendations of award etc. If ANY information contained within your proposal is deemed sensitive or confidential, please indicate this clearly and CoA will strive to retain this Confidentiality. Armory Hall Request for Proposals - Architect/Design Services 5.3 Proposal Format Preferred electronic format is a single .pdf of your firm’s complete response. The fee schedule is to uploaded as a separate document. So that the selection committee may most easily reference sections and pages of the proposal, please number all pages and provide tab sheets to separate sections and provide an index or table of contents. Proposals submitted in response to this solicitation are irrevocable for 60 days following the due date of the proposals. This period may be extended by written agreement between Respondent and the City of Aspen. 6.0 Owner’s Language 6.1 Interests of the City of Aspen The City of Aspen reserves the right to reject any or all Proposals or accept what is, in its sole judgment, the Proposal which is in the City's best interest. The City further reserves the right, in the best interests of the City, to modify this RFP process as it sees fit or waive any technical defects or irregularities in any and all Proposals submitted. The successful Respondent is prohibited from assigning or subcontracting the whole or any part of the contract without the prior written consent of the owner. 6.2 Insurance Requirements Refer to the attached AIA B132 form of agreement between the Owner and Architect for insurance requirements. 7.0 Exhibits 7.1 Contracts Exhibit A - AIA B101 Agreement between the Owner and Architect Exhibit B - Mills + Schnoering Architects, conditions assessment Exhibit C - Workbook of rates and fees Armory Hall Request for Proposals - Architect/Design Services