Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutagenda.hpc.20240911.amendedAGENDA ASPEN HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION September 11, 2024 4:30 PM, City Council Chambers - 3rd Floor 427 Rio Grande Place Aspen, CO 81611 I.ROLL CALL II.MINUTES II.A Draft Minutes - 7/24/24 III.PUBLIC COMMENTS IV.COMMISSIONER MEMBER COMMENTS V.DISCLOSURE OF CONFLICT OF INTEREST VI.PROJECT MONITORING VII.STAFF COMMENTS VIII.CERTIFICATE OF NO NEGATIVE EFFECT ISSUED IX.CALL UP REPORTS X.SUBMIT PUBLIC NOTICE FOR AGENDA ITEMS XI.SUBSTANTIAL AMENDMENT XII.OLD BUSINESS XII.A 117 N. Sixth St. - Minor Development - PUBLIC HEARING minutes.hpc.20240724_DRAFT.docx Staff Memo.117 N Sixth St.20240906.pdf Draft Resolution #, Series of 2024.117 N Sixth St.20240906.pdf Exhibit A - Design Guidelines Analysis.117 N Sixth St.20240906.pdf Exhibit B - Application.117 N Sixth St.LPA-24-006.pdf Exhibit C - Application Addendum.117 N Sixth St.20240906.pdf Exhibit D - HPC Meeting Minutes.20240710.pdf 1 1 XIII.NEW BUSINESS XIII.A Resolution #____, Series of 2024 - 128 East Main Street - Sardy House - Minor HP, Setback Variation XIII.B Election of Vice-Chair XIV.ADJOURN XV.NEXT RESOLUTION NUMBER 128 E Main Street_Sardy House_HP Minor Review_Setback Variation_Memo.pdf 128 E Main Street_Sardy House_HP Minor Review_Setback Variation_Resolution ___,Series of 2024.pdf Exhibit A_128 E Main Street_Sardy House_Consolidated_Review Criteria Responses.pdf Exhibit B_Land Use Application_Final_128 E. Main St._Sardy House Minor Development_HVAC Replacement_05.07.24.pdf TYPICAL PROCEEDING FORMAT FOR ALL PUBLIC HEARINGS (1 Hour, 15 Minutes for each Major Agenda Item) 1. Declaration of Conflicts of Interest (at beginning of agenda) 2. Presentation of proof of legal notice (at beginning of agenda) 3. Applicant presentation (10 minutes for minor development; 20 minutes for major development) 4. Board questions and clarifications of applicant (5 minutes) 5. Staff presentation (5 minutes for minor development; 10 minutes for major development) 6. Board questions and clarifications of staff (5 minutes) 7. Public comments (5 minutes total, or 3 minutes/ person or as determined by the Chair) 8. Close public comment portion of hearing 9. Applicant rebuttal/clarification (5 minutes) 10. Staff rebuttal/clarification (5 minutes) End of fact finding. Chairperson identifies the issues to be discussed. 11. Deliberation by the commission and findings based on criteria commences. No further input from applicant or staff unless invited by the Chair. Staff may ask to be recognized if there is a factual error to be corrected. If the item is to be continued, the Chair may provide a summary of areas to be restudied at their discretion, but the applicant is not to re-start discussion of the case or the board’s direction. (20 minutes) 12. Motion. Prior to vote the chair will allow for call for clarification for the proposed resolution. Please note that staff and/or the applicant must vacate the dais during the opposite presentation and board question and clarification session. Both staff and applicant team will vacate the dais during HPC deliberation unless invited by the chair to return. 2 2 Updated: March 7, 2024 3 3 REGULAR MEETING HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION JULY 24TH, 2024 Chairperson Thompson opened the regular meeting of the Aspen Historic Preservation Commission at 4:30pm. Commissioners in attendance: Roger Moyer, Kim Raymond, Barb Pitchford, Peter Fornell, Jodi Surfas, Riley Warwick and Kara Thompson. Absent was Jeffrey Halferty. Mr. Charlie Tarver noted that he did not confirm attendance. He said that he was recently appointed by City Council to the Planning & Zoning Commission and since he cannot sit on two commissions at once, he was officially resigning from HPC. He left the table and sat in the audience. Jodi Surfas and Riley Warwick arrived at 4:32pm. Staff present: Stuart Hayden, Planner - Historic Preservation Ben Anderson, Community Development Director Luisa Berne, Assistant City Attorney Mike Sear, Deputy City Clerk MINUTES: None PUBLIC COMMENTS: Mr. David Scruggs handed out copies of an email exchange between Ms. Thompson and Mr. Hayden that he had obtained through a CORA request. He said that it produced evidence that the west addition at 205 West Main St. was actually historic, in contrast to the applicant’s claim that it was not. He noted that, in the email exchange, Ms. Thompson noted that if the addition was indeed historic it would need to remain. Mr. Scruggs noted that the new expedited approval process does not allow for the destruction of any historic portions of the resource. He believed the applicant should amended their application to retract their demolition of the addition and show how they are to restore the entirety of the historic resource. Ms. Thompson stated that it was Mr. Hayden that found the information. Mr. Fornell asked if the property owner had been notified, to which Mr. Hayden answered yes. Mr. Hayden noted that he and Ms. Raymond, acting as the monitor, completed a site visit and that applicant team had been very accommodating with the investigation. He also noted that assistant City Attorney, Kate Johnson was also working on the legal implications. Knowing that Ms. Johnson was not present, Ms. Thompson requested that she give the board an update at the next meeting. COMMISSION MEMBER COMMENTS: Ms. Thompson wanted to remind staff and applicants of the presentation timeframes as outlined in the agenda. Referencing a recent newspaper article about who owns various buildings in town, Mr. Moyer thought that HPC should ask the City to take a hard look at how long these projects sit. He thought it ridiculous that projects end up sitting for five, six, seven years. Ms. Pitchford agreed with Mr. Moyer and commented on the current state of the Boomerang Lodge and the amount of various things being stored on the site. She considered the property derelict now. Like Mr. Moyer, she agreed that there was more that could be done. 4 REGULAR MEETING HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION JULY 24TH, 2024 Mr. Hayden noted that the property owners had submitted for permits as part of their ongoing repairs to the site. He noted that some of the items stored on the site may be in the right of way and encouraged members to report anything that had been there for a while to the City’s 311 app. DISCLOSURE OF CONFLICTS OF INTEREST: None PROJECT MONITORING: None. STAFF COMMENTS: None. CERTIFICATE OF NO NEGATIVE EFFECT: None CALL UP REPORTS:None SUBMIT PUBLIC NOTICE FOR AGENDA ITEMS: Ms. Berne confirmed that public notice was completed in compliance with the Code as needed for the two agenda items. SUBSTANTIAL AMENDMENT:420 E. Cooper Ave. - Substantial Amendment -Public Hearing Applicant Presentation: Mr. Chris Bendon – Bendon Adams / Charles Cunniffe – Charles Cunniffe Architecture Mr. Bendon began by noting that there was a project monitoring request submitted in May and that they wanted to discuss the structural repairs that need to be addressed to be able to execute on the approvals. He then went over some of the history of the building and background of the project and the previous approvals. These included a 2019 minor development to join the upper floors of 420 and 418. In this, HPC approved new openings in the east and west party walls of the Red Onion as well as mechanical equipment locations. He described the locations of the approved openings on the 2019 site plan. He also noted a2023 amendment to change the openings on the east and west walls and relocating mechanical equipment due to sound issues. He noted that these were the openings that they discussed at the site visit. He said that they now have a better understanding of the condition of the brick walls and realize they need to redefine the structural load calculations to keep the building upright. Mr. Cunniffe went over the reasoning for their request noting the condition of the roof rafters and that they are inadequate under current standards. In order to introduce additional structural elements, it was suggested to slide new LVL beams in from the side. Mr. Cunniffe said that this would require the removal of small portions of the brick walls, sliding in the new LVLs and then replacing the bricks. He also described the need to remove additional brick above the two large openings between the two spaces to install a lintel to support the brick wall above. This would also include replacing the removed brick. He noted that in these two processes there would be some of the brick that would not be worth saving and that they plan to reuse some of the historic brick that was removed in creating the openings to replace the unusable brick. He noted that they would like to express as much of the historic brick as possible in the new space. Mr. Bendon then went over the relative historic preservation guidelines that apply here and stated that they believe that they have been met. 5 REGULAR MEETING HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION JULY 24TH, 2024 Mr. Moyer asked who the contractor was. Mr. Cunniffe said that it was Whiting Turner. Mr. Moyer then asked if someone with that firm had their Historic Preservation BEST Card. Mr. Cunniffe said he did not know one way or the other as he was just the architect on the project and not the contractor. Mr. Moyer then asked if progress was being held up due to the construction issues. Mr. Cunniffe said that it had held up his portion of the work. Mr. Moyer asked if the roof trusses were only being held up by the existing brick wall. Mr. Cunniffe confirmed that. Mr. Moyer asked if the lintels would be supported by the brick walls. Mr. Cunniffe said they would have some additional support as well as the wall. Ms. Raymond asked if the entire area of brick highlighted on the site plan above the two openings would be removed to install the lintels and LVLs. Mr. Cunniffe said yes, but the idea would be to replace the brick so that someone would not know it was done. Ms. Thompson asked if they had researched a matching new brick if they needed to replace removed historic brick with new. Mr. Cunniffe said they should have enough historic brick from the creation of the approved openings to replace any damaged pieces. In the worst case scenario, he said they would source matching brick. Ms. Pitchford asked for clarification of some language in the staff memo that seemed to state that 348 square feet of historic brick would be removed and replaced and that that would be against the preservation guidelines. She agreed that it might be a better question for Mr. Hayden. Staff Presentation:Stuart Hayden - Planner - Historic Preservation Mr. Hayden began by stating that when he wrote the staff memo it was his understanding that the applicant was planning to remove and replace the historic brick and that at the site visit, he was surprised to learn that their intention was to remove and reuse the brick. He noted that that is more in line with the preservation guidelines. He started his presentation by asking the board to ask the applicant for clarity regarding the historic rafters. He noted that the drawings represented by the applicant here show them being removed and the application materials they provided before the deadline showed them being preserved. Mr. Cunniffe stated that the existing structure including the bottom cord of the truss would remain and that they are just supplementing with additional support. Mr. Hayden said that they are mainly looking at historic design guideline 2.1 calling for the preservation of historic materials. He noted that staff believes that selective disassembly and reassembly of the brick in order to install the new roof joists meets the guideline. He did point out a specific bullet point in that guideline that suggests the removal of such a large portion of material is inappropriate and he wanted the board to discuss it. He detailed this bullet point and staff’s concerns of whether the proposed rebuilding of that portion of the wall constitute a large portion. Mr. Hayden stated thatstaff recommends approval with conditions effectively allowing the selective removal of brick to install the new joists. He said that staff wants to ensure that the brick is reused, and as little new brick is introduced. Mr. Fornell asked that when the bricks are removed if they would be inventoried to ensure they are the same ones that would be reused. Mr. Hayden said that could be added as a condition for staff and monitor review but that from the applicant’s handling of the historic pedestrian pavers, he was confident in the same level of care be taken with the brick. 6 REGULAR MEETING HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION JULY 24TH, 2024 Mr. Moyer asked if Mr. Hayden and the monitor on the project felt this request was more than they wanted to take on and thought to bring it to HPC. Mr. Hayden said that prior to updates that were included in the application the original insubstantial amendment was denied. He said that may have been due to a misunderstanding of what the applicants were actually proposing. Mr. Moyer went back to his past question about someone on site having the historic preservation BEST card. He felt it very unprofessional that whoever held the BEST card was not present at the site visit. Mr. Hayden noted that he hadchecked the list of historic BEST card holders and that there was presumably two current members of the Whiting – Turner contracting company that hold the card. There was then some discussion about whether the wall in question was still considered exterior or if it was now considered interior. Mr. Hayden said that it has been an exterior wall, probably was an interior wall at some point and it’s somewhat both currently. He noted that when the project is complete part of it will be exterior facing and some of it will be interior. Mr. Moyer said he just wanted to be clear on this, as HPC’s purview was only exterior walls. Ms. Thompson said that this interior wall will affect the other exterior walls. Mr. Fornell asked who originally discovered that this work was outside the scope of the approvals. Mr. Hayden said that it was not clear, but that he would look into it. Ms. Pitchford asked Mr. Hayden if in fact he was mistaken in the staff memo that the applicant’s intention was to remove the brick and replace it with new material. Mr. Hayden said that in the applicant’s written description of the proposed work it suggested to him that they were proposing to replace the brick with new. He said that his understanding now is that they intend to disassemble the wall and reassemble it using the historic brick once the joists are installed. Public Comment:Mr. Charlie Tarver commented that clarity of questions was important yet often overlooked. He noted that communicating what someone says should put that exact image in someone’s head. He thought the HPC board needed to work on clarity of statements. Board Discussion: Mr. Warwick wanted to clarify that this proposal and resulting conversation were mostly about the structural integrity of the walls. Ms. Thompson said yes. She also noted that since the roof trusses were historic and could not be removed the applicant is proposing to sister new joists in. Also, if HPC had not approved the creation of the new wall openings the applicant would not have to do this work. Mr. Fornell appreciated that it came back to HPC if staff and monitor were unsure. Ms. Thompson stated that she supported the method of the roof rafter installation as the appropriate way to do this. The rest of the members agreed. Ms. Thompson thought the removal of brick to install the steel lintels above the wall openings was a bit of a grey area, but also thought it was the appropriate method to make sure the building will last. Mr. Moyer said he was surprised that the applicant did not stress that removing the bricks above the wall openings and rebuilding them would make the building stronger. Ms. Thompson and other members said they heard the applicant say that at the site visit. Mr. Moyer thought it was a wise thing to do. The other members agreed. 7 REGULAR MEETING HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION JULY 24TH, 2024 Ms. Raymond appreciated the applicant coming to the HPC board with these proposals as well as for honoring the Red Onion by showcasing the historic brick on the inside and taking the care they have proposed in the disassembly and reassembly of the brick. MOTION:Ms. Thompson moved to approve the next resolution in the series with the following revisions. Condition #1 shall read “all historic brick that is removed shall be replaced with historic brick unless irreparably damaged.” Condition #2 shall read "Installation of the heretofore partially installed new roof joists is to be completed in accordance with the process herein approved for the north end of the east wall and the south end of the west wall using similar brick salvaged from elsewhere on the historic resource”. Condition #3 to read “All new brick shall be submitted to the project monitoring committee for review”. Condition #4 to read “all historic brick that is removed shall be stored appropriately according to recommendation of the brick specialist”. Mr. Fornell seconded. Roll call vote: Mr. Fornell, yes; Mr. Moyer, yes; Ms. Surfas, yes; Ms. Pitchford, yes; Ms. Raymond, yes; Mr. Warwick, yes; Ms. Thompson, yes. 7-0 vote, motion passes. Mr. Moyer asked the applicant if this process was helpful. Mr. Bendon said that in working on many projects in town, things come up that are not expected, especially on downtown historic buildings. He acknowledged that staff had moved this item in front of HPC as quickly as they could and were very respectful of the ongoing work Ms. Raymond was assigned as a second monitor on this project. NEW BUSINESS: 120 E. Main St. - AspenModern Historic Designation and Benefits, Conceptual Major Development, Transferable Development Rights (TDRs), Major Subdivision, Planned Development, Special Review, and Growth Management Review -PUBLIC HEARING Applicant Presentation:Jessica Garrow – Design Workshop & Richard Shaw Mr. Shaw introduced himself as a partner of the partnership created to own the building. He started by going over the history of the building and noted that the partnership had owned the building since they bought it from Pitkin County 30 years ago. He then went over their requests including the voluntary AspenModern designation of the building and parcel. He stated that the building is about 8,000 square feet and that there still remained a significant amount of developable potential on the property. He then listed additional topics of discussion, including some of the benefits that go along with the designation, some minor modifications to the building and the proposal to construct residential housing on the rear lot. He briefly described the AspenModern program and the building’s historic significance, noting that it was designed by Fritz Benedict and Herbert Bayer. He then described some of the significant architectural features of the building and the importance of Mr. Benedict and Mr. Bayer to Aspen. He continued describing the history of the building once it was finished and occupied. He moved on by listing the five areas in which designation can be sought and applied for. Ms. Garrow went through the setting of the building and its importance within the City. She also described a few of the surrounding properties. She then went over the few minor modifications that had occurred to the building since it was built in 1966. She then described the AspenModern program and highlighted how this property met the designation criteria. Next Ms. Garrow noted that the designation of this property would include the removal of significant development pressure on the historic resource and that they are proposing some minor modifications 8 REGULAR MEETING HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION JULY 24TH, 2024 and repairs in-place using historic materials whenever possible. She went over the three benefits they are requesting in exchange for the designation. The first was some variation benefits to install some mechanical equipment on the roof for a future restaurant use and a setback variance to ensure the new development is pushed as far away for the resource as possible. They would also like to continue the memorialization of the stacked parking. Ms. Garrow moved onto the economic benefits they are requesting with the designation. She noted that they are requesting 10 TDRs be granted, representing the removal of 2500 square feet of development from the property in perpetuity. They are also proposing two small free market residential units detached from the historic resource and located on the rear lot. They are also requesting fee waivers, 10 years of vested rights and a six-month rescission period, noting that there was only one month left in the designation negotiating timeframe. She mentioned that these benefits are typical and have been granted to other properties. Ms. Garrow then showed the various elevations of the building and described some of the proposed modifications, including reconfiguring a non-historic deck off the rear of the building and the location of future roof top mechanical equipment. She pointed out the location of the existing light well and noted that they are proposing to add a second one. She noted that once the two lots are combined per their proposal the entire parcel would be historically designated and that HPC would have purview over the historic resource as well as the development in the rear. Ms. Garrow continued by reviewing the Growth Management implications of the proposed new development in the rear of the property. She detailed the size of the two proposed units and noted that they are requesting a cash-in-lieu payment for the required mitigation be permitted. She continued by describing the design of the proposed rear building referencing the historic guidelines that call for the new construction to relate to two of three aspects of the historic resource. She noted that the building design relates to the form and fenestration of the historic resource. The roof pitch of the new building matches that of the historic as well as the design of the windows. She showed a few elevations of the new building to highlight this. She also noted that they are proposing nine parking spaces which meets the code requirement. Mr. Shaw concluded by saying that they, as owners, through the voluntary designation, are committing to not changing the historic resource without reviews, not expanding the resource on the site and to forever change the flexibility of the owner to develop the parcel. He noted that in exchange they are requesting the benefits that they had listed in the application and detailed in their presentation. He referenced the two resolutions in the packet and noted that they are quite different. He acknowledged staff’s responsibility as the Community Development arm of the City, but as owners, he felt the application and benefits requested were well thought out and in balance with what is being provided in the voluntary designation and historic preservation. Mr. Warwick asked if there was any below grade space proposed for the new residential structure. Mr. Shaw said it was all above grade. Mr. Warwick asked for clarity on the proposed parking spaces as the application proposes nine, but it then counts out 10. Ms. Garrow said it was originally 10 spaces, but after referral comments from the Building Department, they reduced it to nine. Ms. Raymond askedMs. Garrow to show the site plan again and asked about the four stacked parking spaces. Ms. Garrow showed the site plan and said the four stacked spaces were an existing condition on the property. 9 REGULAR MEETING HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION JULY 24TH, 2024 Ms. Surfas asked about the proposed potential for a restaurant space. Mr. Shaw said the reason they are asking for the mechanical systems on the roof is so that a restaurant could be a tenant in the future. Mr. Moyer asked if they had purchased both lots at the same time. Mr. Shaw said the front lot was purchased in 1992 and the rear lot was purchased in 1993. Ms. Raymond asked about the trash and recycling area and noted that it was well under the required amount of square footage. Ms. Garrow said the application was updated and now they are only slightly under the required amount. Ms. Raymond asked if they had started the civil engineering process to deal with snow retention. Mr. Shaw said that they had done a stormwater plan addressing the stormwater runoff and snow removal. Ms. Raymond then asked how tall the existing building was in comparison to the proposed three-story new residential development. Mr. Shaw said the new development was designed for the height limit of 28 feet and the existing building is 19.5 feet. Ms. Raymond then asked if they had tried to place the mechanical equipment anywhere else, as she believed it would be visible from Main Street. Mr. Shaw described the other locations they had looked at and why the one they chose was the most appropriate. There was some discussion about the current heating and cooling systems for the existing building. Ms. Raymond asked if they could talk more about the design of the proposed rear residential building. She said she was having a hard time seeing the relationship in fenestration to the historic building as well as how it is compatible or enhances the character of the neighborhood in relation to mass and scale of the historic building as called for in section 26.445.50 of the Municipal Code. She said the new building is very tall and skinny while the historic building is more squatty and horizontal. Ms. Thompson said she had the same questions and asked the applicant to further explain where their logic was coming from. Mr. Shaw went over their reasoning, highlighting the wood siding, similar orientation of the larger windows looking toward the mountain as well as the other smaller windows. Ms. Raymond then asked why they were requesting 10 years of vesting rights. Mr. Shaw said part of it was due to the phasing of multiple parts of the how a project might go together. These included the acquisition of future tenants, a construction schedule and restoration and rehabilitation work on the existing historic building. They felt like it was fully justified considering what the owners were giving up in the voluntary designation. Ms. Thompson asked about the applicant’s’ reasoning for the 6-month recession period. Mr. Shaw said that this process is a very quick one and as owners they need the time, after the final City Council decision, to consider what that decision entails. Ms. Surfas asked why they were prosing all this now and not at some point in the last 30 years that they owned the building. Mr. Shaw said that the ownership of Design Workshop had changed over time and that they are in a different place in their lives. He noted that Design Workshop had a new office in Basalt. Staff Presentation:Ben Anderson – Community Development Director & Stuart Hayden - Historic Preservation Planner Mr. Anderson began bygoing over HPC’s jurisdiction in this matter and noted that this was a recommendation to City Council. He noted that there was clear agreement from staff with much of what the applicant presented in terms of the importance of the building. He said that the focus of the staff memo was on the benefits being requested and the aggregation of them. He listed the many reviews 10 REGULAR MEETING HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION JULY 24TH, 2024 associated with this application and noted that the designation benefits and conceptual major development were under the HPC per the Municipal Code. He noted that while staff and the applicant agree most of the criteria to be met on many of the reviews, staff does differ when it comes to the benefits requested. He pointed out the 10 TDRs requested to be generated from the commercial building by the applicant and their request to allow the development of two market rate residences in the rear of the property. He again noted that the aggregate of all the benefits being requested was a significant ask. Mr. Anderson continued by describing the TDR program and noted that it was intended and designed for residential properties. Applying them in the context of a commercial building was not imagined by the program when it was conceived. He again noted that staff felt that the request for 10 TDRs was a significant ask. He then noted that coming out of the development moratorium in 2022 was a clear statement from City Council that they did not want any new free market residential development on Main Street in the mixed-use zone district. He said that staff did not disagree with the site planning and relationship of the new building to the resource, yet the type of residential use was in clear conflict with the zone district. He then went over the site plan and noted the utilities easement between the two lots and the existing stacked parking that staff felt was ok because it has been the existing condition. He pointed out the requested rear setback variance on the site plan in relationship to the proposed new development and said that staff was generally supportive of that. In conclusion Mr. Anderson said that staff was fully supportive of the AspenModern designation and felt the lot merger was appropriate and brought some simplicity to the lot. He said staff was also in support of the use of the Planned Development which would allow the setback variance and the issuance of some amount of TDRs on the commercial property. He noted that while staff agreed that residential use may be appropriate, it should be consistent with the allowed uses in the zone district, and they believed it should be deed-restricted affordable housing which could include Resident Occupied as opposed to category units. He said that staff did not want to preclude a restaurant use in the resource, but felt it was premature to discuss the landing place of mechanical equipment at this time. He noted that if affordable housing rather than free market was recommended by HPC, staff fully supports the other miscellaneous benefit requests, including the fee waivers and the alternate mitigation payment request. If free market was recommended, staff felt that in aggregate some of the requests seemed excessive due to the potential benefit of the free market use over the allowed use in the district. Mr. Hayden then touched on the conceptual development request for the residential development in the rear. He noted that it was tricky matter because it was more of a benefit request and the historic design guidelines needed to be weighed against the potential benefit to the community of the historic designation of the resource. He noted that with the historic designation the design standard criteria would move from the zone district design guidelines to the historic preservation design guidelines which are a little stricter. Mr. Fornell asked Mr. Anderson if any commercial buildings had ever had TDRs pulled off of them. Mr. Anderson said that to his recollection he could not identify a project. He again noted that the TDR program had almost entirely been driven on single family and duplex residential properties. Mr. Hayden 11 REGULAR MEETING HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION JULY 24TH, 2024 added that the code specifically says that the one of the primary uses of TDRs has to be for residential properties. Mr. Fornell then asked if a cash-in-lieu payment would be an acceptable alternative to the stacked parking. Mr. Anderson said yes, but that it was not part of the proposal and staff felt the stacked parking was appropriate based on it being an existing condition and that it can be considered under special review. Mr. Fornell asked if a fee waiver had ever been a successful part of an AspenModern designation negotiation. Mr. Anderson said yes and noted that most of the potential fees in this project would be related to the development on the rear of the property and that some would be waived by the Land Use Code if it was affordable housing. He also noted that the affordable housing mitigation payments pretty much goes away if the development was affordable. Ms. Pitchford asked if there had been any approval for residential housing development in the mixed- use zone in the past few years. Mr. Anderson said related code changes go back to 2012, when Council began to act regarding free market development in mixed-use buildings in commercial zones. Most recently in 2022 it was expanded to the mixed-use district when Council precluded new market rate or expansion of existing market rate along Main Street. He noted that affordable housing remains a permitted use as does commercial. Ms. Thompson moved to extend the meeting until 7:20pm. Mr. Fornell seconded. All in favor, motion passes. Ms. Raymond asked for clarification of what HPC is being asked of and if their jurisdiction changed since it would be going to City Council. Mr. Anderson said that this would be a recommendation and that there were two resolutions in front of them. One that represented everything the applicant was asking for and one that included staff’s proposal. He said that HPC could agree with one or the other, neither or could agree to a mix of them. He noted that the main thing that HPC would be recommending was related to the package of benefits being requested by the applicant. Public Comment:Ms. Ann Mullins commented about Fritz Benedict and noted that the building took on a personality of its own. She said that she had worked on the City’s AspenModern task force that advocated for a historic designation process similar to the existing historic Victorian non-voluntary designation program. She noted that it did not pass and since the City had lost many midcentury modern resources. She noted that in their work they identified this building as one of the best examples of the AspenModern style. She detailed Mr. Benedict’s history and work in Aspen. She urged the HPC to support the designation of this important building, but also urged the applicant and City Council to accept compromises to save this building. Ms. Thompson asked Ms. Mullins if she would approve the 10 TDRs if she was still on Council. Ms. Mullins said she may tweak it a bit and noted that she was on Council when they got rid of free market development on Main Street. Mr. Lex Tarumianz agreed with Ms. Mullins’ comments regarding Mr. Benedict’s influence on Aspen. He noted that there was precedent for TDRs related to a commercial property on Main Street at 430 West Main Street. He described the history of that property and the generation of TDRs there. He commented that the impact of the landing of potential TDRs generated with this project was minimal since the maximum square footage that can land on a single property was 500 square feet. He thought the impact 12 REGULAR MEETING HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION JULY 24TH, 2024 would not be noticeable in the community. He said that the owners of the building created something special in town and should be rewarded for that. Mr. Charlie Tarver noted that he was a friend of Mr. Benidict and commented on the building’s importance. He noted that the proposed housing would impact him as he lived very close, and the new building would block his porch. With this in mind, he still supported the application and thought it was the right thing to do. Ms. Thompson closed the public comment. There was then some discussion about the potential process if the owners decided, without a designation, to demolish the building. Ms. Berne said that per the code, since the building was in the Main Street Historic District that type of proposal would come before HPC, but she cautioned the members not to use that as part of their decision making tonight. Board Discussion: Ms. Thompson started the discussion trying to gather a general sense of where the board members stand and noted that she may want the applicant to come back up afterwards to see what they might be amenable to. Mr. Fornell noted that pages 89 and 90 of the agenda packet listed the staff recommendations that included nine areas for conversation, and he thought they should go through them one by one. Mr. Fornell then made a motion to extend the meeting to 7:45pm. Ms. Thompson seconded. All in favor, motion passes. Ms. Thompson asked if any members did not support the application in front of them for an AspenModern Designation. The members all agreed and supported designation Mr. Fornell clarified that under the requested benefits listed, he did not support designation. Mr. Warwick noted that everyone supported designation under certain circumstances. He suggested they start with the first listed condition of the requested TDRs. Mr. Fornell felt that the 10 requested TDRs were appropriate. He did not see the difference between a commercial development and residential when they are trying to save it. Mr. Warwick also supported the 10 TDRs. He did not think it would be noticed in town when they get spread out over 5 buildings. He felt a commercial property may not have been considered when the program was initiated,and incentives need to be in place to preserve historic properties whether they were residential or commercial. Ms. Pitchford disagreed and felt that the TDR program was based on residential properties, and she was not a big fan of it. She understood the incentive of TDRs and since she loved this building and respected the people who have taken such good care of it, she was in support of the 10 TDRs. Ms. Thompson agreed with Mr. Fornell and Mr. Warwick and thought granting the TDRs was the right thing to do to preserve the structure. She was happy to recommend the 10 TDRs and have City Council discuss it further. Ms. Raymond had mixed feelings about it. She noted that if you cannot fit the maximum amount of allowable square feet on a lot, you have to somewhat forfeit it. She said 10 TDRs felt a bit excessive to her, but in the desire to save this building, she would reluctantly give them 10 TDRs. Mr. Moyer was not apposed to the 10 TDRs and thought it was really City Council’s decision. 13 REGULAR MEETING HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION JULY 24TH, 2024 Ms. Surfas thought that there were so many other things the applicant was asking for that this had to play into it. They moved onto the request to build two free-market residential units. Mr. Fornell did not support free-market development due to all the efforts the City made during the moratorium determining that free-market development was not the highest and best use. Mr. Warwick noted that his belief was that the vacant lot was currently in the R6 zone district without the merger and was not in the Main St. mixed use zone. Because of the current zone, they could build free market there now and he thought that while they are offering voluntary designation and to merge the lots, the current zoning should be considered. Mr. Anderson noted that the back lot has a complex history and staff believe the zone district map is in error and that both lots were considered in the previously known “office zone” district that became the mixed-use district. Ms. Garrow agreed with Mr. Anderson but noted that the back lot is not in the historic district. Mr. Warwick confirmed that in his personal opinion he supported free market development regardless of what the current Code says. Ms. Thompson felt that free market development was consistent with the historical development in this neighborhood, but also understood that City Council recently changed the Code to not allow free market in this district. She stated that she would support a recommendation to Council that allowed free market development with their review, as they were the ones that changed the Code. She said that she would personally like to see affordable housing units and would like to see if the applicant is amenable to deed restricting any of those units. Ms. Raymond was not in support of free market because it is in complete conflict with the zone district. She felt the City is in dire need for affordable housing and this would be a great opportunity for it. She agreed with Mr. Fornell that the City has worked for a long time to eliminate penthouses and free market in the zone district. Mr. Moyer did not support free market development. Ms. Surfas wondered if there could be a mix of free market and deed restricted units in the building. Ms. Pitchford echoed what Ms. Mullins had said in that they have to do everything they can to get it designated. She wondered what the compromise could be. Mr. Moyer noted that this was still just a recommendation to Council and that they might think about just saying that the board had mixed opinions on this topic, and they encourage Council to make an appropriate decision in the interest of saving the resource. The board members agreed. They moved on to discuss the affordable housing mitigation. Mr. Fornell noted that if Council allows free market development, then there would be the need for mitigation. He was not in favor of a cash-in-lieu or payment over time. He felt spreading out the payments serves no purpose for the community. He noted a recent studio apartment that the City recently purchased for $1.2 million that mitigated 1.25 FTEs and that there are certificates in the market for purchase right now. The board agreed that they supported staff’s recommendation except that the mitigation not be in the form of cash-in-lieu. The next item was the waiver of fees. The board supported staff’s recommendations on this. 14 REGULAR MEETING HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION JULY 24TH, 2024 The next item was the applicant’s request seeking a guarantee that a restaurant tenant could occupy the existing building. The board supported staff’s recommendations on this item. Ms. Thompson said she was very hesitant to allow equipment on the roof without first reviewing and knowing exactly what that equipment is. The next item dealt with the applicant’s request for 10 years of vesting rights and a rescission period of six months. Mr. Fornell referenced Mr. Moyer’s comments earlier in the meeting about all the places in town that are sitting still. He noted that State statute requires a three-year vesting right. He believed, historically speaking, that the primary reason applicants request more than three-years vesting is to get an approval from a board that valuates their real estate in order to resell it. He stressed that in no way was he accusing this applicant of that intent but had no interest in helping someone flip a lot. He said he does not support the extension of vesting rights in any application. Regarding the rescission period, he noted that if someone is not happy with the direction the historic designation negotiation process is going, you can ask for an extension and pull your application. Ms. Thompson agreed with staff’s recommendation supporting 10 years of vesting rights and a six- month rescission period if limited to deed restricted development and no more than 3-years rights for free market. She noted that extending vesting rights is something this board has granted for many AspenModern project that they have reviewed, and she could see extending it to five years if it is free market as 10 years seemed like a lot. Ms. Pitchford agreed. Ms. Raymond also agreed that 10 years was a little excessive as no one knows what the Code may be in 10 years. She supported the compromise of five years. While noting that this building is worth a lot to the community, she did think the aggregate of what the applicant was asking for was a lot as well. She wondered why it would take 10 years. Ms. Thompson asked the members if they would be ok with 10 years if it was affordable housing. The majority of members did not support that idea. The board agreed to recommend a five-year vesting period no matter what way the development went. As for the requested rescission period the board was mostly in agreement to support it. Mr. Fornell again commented that if they get an approval, they don’t want they can choose not to use it and if they don’t like how things are going, they could always pull their application. The board then agreed that they were of a mixed opinion on rescission portion of this item. The next item was the Planned Development (PD) request. Mr. Fornell noted that one needs at least 15,000 square feet to apply for a PD. He thought that in requesting a PD they were asking for setback variances for a non-permitted use. Because of that, he did not support the request of a PD. He felt if setback variances were requested related to an affordable housing development down the road, they could still address that then. Ms. Raymond asked Mr. Anderson what the implications would be if a PD was not granted. Mr. Anderson noted that the Code allows the Community Development Director some flexibility on a PD if the minimum lot size is not met. He also noted that setbacks are more easily dealt with under a PD as well as the PD giving some flexibility on the TDRs. He said that without the PD, there would not be a guarantee of the variance and if there is a decision to grant the TDRs, you would be asking to do something that is not allowed in the Land Use Code. 15 REGULAR MEETING HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION JULY 24TH, 2024 Mr. Warwick suggested that they recommend the PD as needed depending on Council’s ultimate decisions. He noted that the PD is really connected to and latched on to a couple of the other provisions. The board agreed. The next item dealt with the Subdivision request. The board was all in agreement and supported the subdivision. The next item was the Parking & Transportation Special Review. Ms. Thompson supported it. Mr. Fornell preferred to see the applicant pay for two cash-in-lieu spaces opposed to the stacked spaces. Mr. Moyer noted that the stacked spaces had been there for a very long time and had never been an issue. Overall, the board was in support of staff’s recommendation for the Parking & Transportation Special Review. Ms. Thompson wanted to voice that she was not in agreement with the proposed form and fenestration of the new construction. She felt it could be resolved but did not agree with the applicant’s form or fenestration argument. She noted that while this was in part a recommendation to City Council on the previously discussed items, it was also a conceptual approval of the new construction in the rear of the property. Ms. Raymond said that if that was the case she also disagreed with the form and fenestration of the new construction. Ms. Thompson moved to extend the meeting to 8:00pm. Mr. Fornell seconded. All in favor, motion passes. The board wondered what the best way to deal with these separately. Mr. Warwick asked if they could just include something in their recommendation that they did not support the form and fenestration of the new development. Mr. Anderson said that if there were fundamental question about the form of the building, they would need to be dealt with at this meeting. The materials and fenestration could be dealt with at final review. Mr. Hayden suggested they deal with both the form and fenestration at this meeting. Ms. Garrow said the applicant would be comfortable with a condition that said that the materials and fenestration would be reviewed at final. She noted that they needed approval of the footprint tonight. The board discussed the ideas in the historic design guidelines about distinguishing a historic resource from new additions related to form. Mr. Moyer felt they could be a bit more flexible than they had been in the past. Ms. Thompson felt that existing historic structure is made up of simple materials of brick around the base of the structure, a simple roof line consistent around the structure and strip windows in between. She said the proposed façade of the new building has chaotic interruptions of fenestration and multiple materials. She said that is the façade that needs revision and felt that it could be easily accomplished by simplifying the palette and fenestration. Ms. Raymond noted that while the roof pitches are the same, the roof form on the historic structure has very long eaves which make the building read very horizontal. She said the new structure is very vertical and has almost no overhang. 16 REGULAR MEETING HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION JULY 24TH, 2024 Mr. Fornell argued that with the height of the historic structure, one would not likely be affected by the rear building when walking down the sidewalk. Ms. Thompson said that she had less concern about the height and reiterated that she felt the material relationship could be easily improved. Ms. Raymond noted that the applicant only had to relate two aspects of the historic resource. The board agreed to the applicant’s concession that both materials and fenestration be reviewed and discussed at the final review. MOTION: Mr. Fornell moved to approve a recommendation to City Council. The motion was based off staff’s nine recommendations and included the following: The commission’s support of the 10 TDRs Deferring to City Council on Residential Development Not allowing a cash-in-lieu payment for affordable housing Not allowing a fee waiver Agreement with staff on the restaurant tenant potential operation Agreement on a five-year vesting rights period and a mixed opinion on the right of rescission Support for the Planned Development as needed determined by Council’s decision Support of the sub-division Support for the parking requirement as presented HPC reserves the right to review at final the materials and fenestration of the new rear addition Ms. Pitchford seconded. Roll call vote: Mr. Fornell, yes; Mr. Moyer, yes; Ms. Surfas, yes; Ms. Pitchford, yes; Ms. Raymond, yes; Mr. Warwick, yes; Ms. Thompson, yes. 7-0 vote, motion passes. Mr. Fornell wanted to thank Richard Shaw and the other owners of the property for the job that they have done over the decades and their stewardship of the property. The other members all agreed. ADJOURN: Ms. Thompson motioned to adjourn the regular meeting. Mr. Fornell seconded. All in favor; motion passes. ____________________ Mike Sear, Deputy City Clerk 17 Members of the HPC you on June 24, 2024 and inquired We appeared before y • • $% without nonce i toric status of the `west addition about the his etin + we disagree e reported at your 8�71o24.meeting. e � your attorney � listen, to the posted r facts and conclusronsi Please ! with he recordingof your 8/7'/2024 meeting at minute 8:01. l am not in facts and drawing givinglegal advice but rather stating conclusions in public com►miento 1. Ms Johnson stated there was no misrepresentation INCORRECT applicant through: out the process has made the The. app � representation in and in oral presentations that the a writing addition was non Historic. whether- this misrepresentation was intentional is not germane as the HPC relied on that representation when it approved removal of the "west addition" in Condition #8 of resolution # 9. it is in curnbent on you to make the determinationi of its historic nature as evidenced by the 1896 Willets Map -and corroborated by the 1895 McClure photo_ of the resource. `The preservation of historic resources is a high priority...The Historic Preservation Commission promotes public -welfare through the protection of enhancement -and preservation of those properties." 2. Ms Johnson said the. issue was not raised. INCORRECT The applicant has not received final administrative approval from Chair Thompson and Mr Hayden under the "expedited process" and: 'it is still ongoing, Applicant has not received - approval from other departments such as Engineering/ Enviromental and Building. NO permits have been issued and NO work undertaken. This is an on going appliCafi oil. Thy issue was raised b staff in May of 2024 (4 months ago). ® t4 6R wrote on May 30,2024 The applicant Chair Thompson represented to us that the area....i non -historic. if historic, it needs to remain." .I wrote Mr Hayden and Ms Johnson on again on Jul22,2024 raising the issue of the 6/24/202.4 and y Historic "west addition" determination. Additionally, your minutes reflect that I appeared before -you on June 26,2024 and 7124/2024 and handed out the -previous correspondence and raised the issue and asked to be informed. of your findings as to the historic nature of the west addition". Ms Jo hnson stated 41 the applicant has taken steps fulfilling the approval that was approved." INCORRECT The applicant is till in the pproval process (see 2 above pp The only approval granted was to movee the. historic resource. The demolition.'of the "west. addition was ap proved based on he -misrepresentation a licant that it was non -historic. ty pp Permits have not been issued and the administrative review has not been completed . The only, steps taken are submissions, drawing and correspondence. 4. Ms Johnson stated "legally, I don't believe you have the right, to revoke approval" further. stating "there is no evidence of misrepresentation." INCORRECT Since a misrepresentation was made by the applicant HPC can revoke approval as you were mislead by. applicant. his the process is ongoing HPC may require further inquiry and in fact have been conducting further inquiry since May 2024 . HPC should proceed with further inquiry, call up the issue, and withhold final administrative approval and revoke approval of a demolitiom `4 the applicant his the right to Move. s ,ion -son stated �� forward as is," INCORRECT was made y the Again, because a misrepresentationcan intentionall or unintentionally) you applicant (e"tther '� aced u were mi lead by apply an and revoke approval as yo . also as decision on that inaccurate rn areprpser tat your de � ongoing you may approval process (bifurcated 2 step ) is q g the pp � , y conducting further inquiry and in fact have been require. '' further inquiry since May 2024 t SUMMARY Chair Thompson said Ms Johnson's Report was "Disappointing". submit if is also incorrect both factually and In its conclusions. The applicant made misrepresentationsto its applications and presentations that the "west addition" is non historic. Staff produced evidence in May 2024 that this may be inaccurate based n the 1896 Willets Map and corroborated the 1 McClure photo of the resource, The issue was clearly raised immediately upon discovery of the misrepresentation, REQUEST We request you ask- MsJohnson to submit to HPC her o s e facts and law clientbased., We request you wam"ve your attorn ey request and make that. opinion -available ta the public, Finally -we proceed based e resources, .. them. citizensRespectfully submitted ' on behalf of the neighbors. and all o Aspen p*' o embrace a fie, + Ma historic preservation. Page 1 of 5 Memorandum LPA-24-006 TO: Aspen Historic Preservation Commission THROUGH: Gillian White, Principal Planner, Historic Preservation FROM: Stuart Hayden, Planner II, Historic Preservation MEETING DATE: September 11, 2024 RE: 117 N. Sixth St. – Minor Development; PUBLIC HEARING APPLICANT /OWNER: Gayla Lynn Tolk REPRESENTATIVE: Jacob Ezratty, Brikor Associates LOCATION: Street Address: 117 N. Sixth St. Legal Description: Lot G, H, and I, Block 18, City and Townsite of Aspen Parcel Identification Number: PID# 2735-124-45-003 CURRENT ZONING & USE R-6 (Moderate-Density Residential); Single- family home PROPOSED ZONING & USE: No change SUMMARY: The applicant requests a Certificate of Appropriateness for Minor Development at 117 N. Sixth St. for the purpose of replacing wood shingle roofing with metal shingle roofing. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommend denial of this Minor Development application. Figure 1. Site Location Map – 117 N. Sixth St. 18 Page 2 of 5 BACKGROUND: The historic resource at 117 N. Sixth St. is an AspenVictorian landmark on a 9,000-square- foot corner parcel in the Medium-Density Residential (R-6) zone district. Constructed in 1885, this T-shaped, gable-roofed, one-story Miner’s Cottage exemplifies the distinctive characteristics of a particular variety of local architecture of the era. It is illustrative of the common construction materials and techniques accessible to the average early Aspenite. The building’s size, simple floor plan, steep roof, wood shingles, painted wood lap siding, vertical sash windows, and full- width front porch with minimal ornamentation characterize this utilitarian style of dwelling. Ordinance #48, Series of 1998, added 117 N. Sixth St. to the Aspen Inventory of Historic Landmark Sites and Structures. In 2000, much larger, two-story, post-modern-style building with standing-seam metal and asphalt shingle roofing was added to the south side of the property, connecting to the historic resource via a covered walkway with black standing-seam metal roof. On July 10, 2024, the HPC first reviewed and considered this application for a Certificate of Appropriateness for Minor Development to replace the existing wood-shingle roofing material with black standing-seam metal. Members of the HPC expressed concern that the proposed roofing material was not similar to the original in both style and physical qualities, and suggested an alternative material that looks more like wood shingles would better meet the Historic Preservation Design Guidelines. The HPC voted to continue the public hearing to September 11, 2024. The applicant’s representatives have since sought alternative roofing materials, and asked staff for additional information. Staff referred the representatives to Guidelines 7.7-7.9, encouraging them to find a material with a size (including thickness), texture and coloration/pattern similar to that of wood shingles. Asked about metal shingles, staff could not think of an instance in which the HPC approved of the material, but assured the applicant’s representatives that did not mean the HPC would not consider it. Staff also noted that the HPC had recently approved 4½- to 7½-inches-wide EcoStar Empire Shake roofing tiles with a 6- or 7- inch exposure. Because every case and context differs, however, staff could not say whether the HPC would approve the same for 117 N. 6th St. Figure 2. Photograph of northeast corner of 117 N. Sixth St., 1957 Figure 3. Detail of 1904 Sanborn Map 19 Page 3 of 5 REQUEST OF HPC: The Applicant requests the following approval: • Minor Development (Sec. 26.415.070(c)): to replace wood shingle roofing with metal shingle roofing. The Historic Preservation Commission (HPC) is the final review authority for this application. PROJECT SUMMARY: • Metal Roofing Material. The applicant proposes to replace the wood shingle roofing on the historic resource with matte black metal shingle roofing. The Vail Metal Shingle by Principio Metal Systems consists of interlocking 34-inch-wide, 12-inch-long panels with folded seams to create the appearance of 8⅛-inch-wide, 11¼-inch-long shingles. The painted metal colors, including matte black, are available in low gloss finishes and have a smooth texture. Because the work will have an “adverse effect on the physical appearance or character- defining features of a designated property,” and does not meet the Historic Preservation Design Guidelines (7.7-7.9, 10.3, 10.4, and 10.6), a certificate of no negative effect is inappropriate pursuant to Aspen Municipal Code Section 26.415.070. Accordingly, the request for black standing-seam metal roofing on the historic resource warrants Minor Development review by the HPC, a one-step review with a public hearing, after which the project may be approved, disapproved, or approved with conditions. Figure 4. Photograph of117 N. Sixth St. from N. Sixth St., 2024 20 Page 4 of 5 STAFF EVALUATION: As detailed in Exhibit A, staff find the application for Certificate of Appropriateness for Minor Development at 117 N. Sixth St. inconsistent with the relevant Historic Preservation Design Guidelines. Not only is black metal shingle roofing neither an in-kind replacement nor “similar to the original” (Guideline 7.7), the large, smooth, black metal shingles are not “a simplified, neutral, modest, and deferential alternative” (Guideline 7.8) thereto. Rather than “maintain or restore the character of the historic roof” (Guideline 7.7), the proposed roofing is more akin to the black standing-seam metal roof on the non-historic addition. For the new addition “to be recognized as a product of its own time” (Guideline 10.6), the historic resource must at least be “distinguishable against the addition” (Guideline 10.4). Although “there is a spectrum of appropriate solutions to distinguishing new from old portions of a development” (Guideline 10.6), installing similar roofing material is not one of them. Accordingly, “an addition that imitates the primary building’s historic style is not allowed” (10.3). Presuming that it is equally, if not more, inappropriate to alter a historic building to imitate an addition’s style, black metal shingles are a particularly unsubtle roofing material for the miner’s cottage at 117 N. Sixth St. The location, form, and architectural style of this historic resource make its roof a particularly prominent character defining feature. The apparently uninterrupted, 139-year-long use of wood shingle on this house makes its roofing material a significant character defining feature. Although replacing the material now may not do irreparable physical damage, failing to follow the Guidelines will indefinitely compromise the historic integrity of the resource. Rather than providing a “written explanation of how the proposed development…complies with the review standards and design guidelines relevant to the application” as is required of an application for a Certificate of Appropriateness for Minor Development, the application (Exhibit B) includes contradictory statements regarding the structural integrity of the historic resource and misleading information about its context. Whereas the written description of the proposal states that “the historic nature of the cabin combined with the current cedar shake shingles creates a potential snow load that could exceed the original structural design of the cabin,” the structural engineer’s letter, included in the application, says nothing of snow loads. The engineer’s letter does, however, describe there being “no obvious signs of structural distress in either the exposed structural members or in the ceiling finishes.” Indeed, the historic roof structure appears to have fared well for having had wood shingles for 139 years. Perhaps the more recent application of interior insulation will affect the rate of snow melt from the historic roof. The “accumulation of snow load to dangerous levels” warned of in the application, however, has yet to affect the front porch despite it not relying on “heat from the cabin to melt the snow” in its 139-year history. The “Surrounding Properties Roof Photos” are similarly misleading. In fact, all the primary structures on properties immediately adjacent to 117 N. Sixth St. have either wood or asphalt shingle roofing. The locations of the standing-seem metal roofing featured in the application are unknown. Their irrelevance, however, is evident. None of the pictured buildings is historic. Staff recommend denial of this request for a Certificate of Appropriateness for Minor Development. 21 Page 5 of 5 REFERRAL COMMENTS: The application was not referred out to other City departments. Their requirements may, nevertheless, affect the permit review if warranted. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommend the HPC deny LPA-24-006. ATTACHMENTS: Resolution # __, Series of 2024 Exhibit A – Historic Preservation Design Guidelines - Staff Findings Exhibit B – Application Exhibit C – Application Addendum Exhibit D – HPC Meeting Minutes of July 10, 2024 22 HPC Resolution #__, Series of 2024 Page 1 of 3 RESOLUTION #__, (SERIES OF 2024) A RESOLUTION OF THE ASPEN HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION (HPC) GRANTING MINOR DEVELOPMENT REVIEW FOR THE PROPERTY LOCATED AT 117 NORTH SIXTH STREET, LEGALLY DESCRIBED AS LOTS G, H, AND I, BLOCK 18, CITY AND TOWNSITE OF ASPEN, PITKIN COUNTY, COLORADO PARCEL ID: 2735-124-45-003 WHEREAS, the applicant, Gayla Lynn Tok, represented by Bikor Associates, has requested HPC approval for a Minor Development for the property located at 117 North Sixth Street, Lots G, H, and I, Block 18, City and Townsite of Aspen, Pitkin County, Colorado; and WHEREAS, Section 26.415.070 of the Municipal Code states that “no building or structure shall be erected, constructed, enlarged, altered, repaired, relocated or improved involving a designated historic property or district until plans or sufficient information have been submitted to the Community Development Director and approved in accordance with the procedures established for their review;” and WHEREAS, for approval of Minor Development Review, the HPC must review the application, a staff analysis report and the evidence presented at a hearing to determine the project’s conformance with the City of Aspen Historic Preservation Design Guidelines per Section 26.415.070.C of the Municipal Code and other applicable Code Sections. The HPC may approve, disapprove, approve with conditions, or continue the application to obtain additional information necessary to make a decision to approve or deny; and WHEREAS, as a historic landmark, the site is exempt from Residential Design Standards review; and WHEREAS, Community Development Department staff reviewed the application for compliance with the applicable review standards and recommended the HPC deny the Minor Development; and WHEREAS, during a duly noticed public hearings on July 10, 2024, and September 11, 2024, the HPC reviewed and considered the application, staff memo, and public comments, finding the application did not meet the applicable review standards and guidelines, and denied the application by a vote of _ to _. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED: That HPC hereby denies Minor Development for the property located at 117 North Sixth Street, Lots G, H, and I, Block 18, City and Townsite of Aspen, Pitkin County, Colorado as follows: Section 1: Material Representations All material representations and commitments made by the Applicant pursuant to the development proposal approvals as herein awarded, whether in public hearing or documentation presented before the Community Development Department, the Historic Preservation Commission, or the 23 HPC Resolution #__, Series of 2024 Page 2 of 3 Aspen City Council are hereby incorporated in such plan development approvals and the same shall be complied with as if fully set forth herein, unless amended by other specific conditions or an authorized authority. Section 2: Existing Litigation This Resolution shall not affect any existing litigation and shall not operate as an abatement of any action or proceeding now pending under or by virtue of the ordinances repealed or amended as herein provided, and the same shall be conducted and concluded under such prior ordinances. Section 3: Severability If any section, subsection, sentence, clause, phrase, or portion of this Resolution is for any reason held invalid or unconstitutional in a court of competent jurisdiction, such portion shall be deemed a separate, distinct, and independent provision and shall not affect the validity of the remaining portions thereof. Section 4: Vested Rights The development approvals granted herein shall constitute a site-specific development plan vested for a period of three (3) years from the date of issuance of a development order. However, any failure to abide by any of the terms and conditions attendant to this approval shall result in the forfeiture of said vested property rights. Unless otherwise exempted or extended, failure to properly record all plats and agreements required to be recorded, as specified herein, within 180 days of the effective date of the development order shall also result in the forfeiture of said vested property rights and shall render the development order void within the meaning of Section 26.104.050 (Void permits). Zoning that is not part of the approved site-specific development plan shall not result in the creation of a vested property right. No later than fourteen (14) days following final approval of all requisite reviews necessary to obtain a development order as set forth in this Ordinance, the City Clerk shall cause to be published in a newspaper of general circulation within the jurisdictional boundaries of the City of Aspen, a notice advising the general public of the approval of a site specific development plan and creation of a vested property right pursuant to this Title. Such notice shall be substantially in the following form: Notice is hereby given to the general public of the approval of a site-specific development plan, and the creation of a vested property right, valid for a period of three (3) years, pursuant to the Land Use Code of the City of Aspen and Title 24, Article 68, Colorado Revised Statutes, pertaining to the following described property: 117 North Sixth Street. Nothing in this approval shall exempt the development order from subsequent reviews and approvals required by this approval of the general rules, regulations and ordinances or the City of Aspen provided that such reviews and approvals are not inconsistent with this approval. The approval granted hereby shall be subject to all rights of referendum and judicial review; the period of time permitted by law for the exercise of such rights shall not begin to run until the date of publication of the notice of final development approval as required under Section 26.304.070(A). The rights of referendum shall be limited as set forth in the Colorado Constitution and the Aspen Home Rule Charter. 24 HPC Resolution #__, Series of 2024 Page 3 of 3 APPROVED BY THE COMMISSION at its regular meeting on the 11th day of September 2024. Approved as to Form: Approved as to Content: ___________________________________ ____________________________________ Katharine Johnson, Assistant City Attorney Kara Thompson, Chair ATTEST: ________________________________ Mike Sear, Deputy City Clerk 25 Page 1 of 5 Exhibit A Historic Preservation Design Guidelines Criteria Staff Findings 26.415.070(c) - Minor Development 1. The review and decision on the issuance of a certificate of appropriateness for minor development shall begin with a determination by the Community Development Director that the proposed project constitutes a minor development. Minor development work includes: a. Expansion or erection of a structure wherein the increase of the floor area of the structure is two hundred and fifty (250) square feet or less; or b. Alterations to a building façade, windows, doors, roof planes or material, exterior wall materials, dormer porch, exterior staircase, balcony or ornamental trim when three (3) or fewer elements are affected and the work does not qualify for a certificate of no negative effect; or c. Erection or installation of a combination or multiples of awning, canopies, mechanical equipment, fencing, signs, accessory features and other attachments to designated properties such that the cumulative impact does not allow for the issuance of a certificate of no negative effect; or d. Alterations that are made to non-historic portions of a designated historic property that do not qualify for a certificate of no negative effect; or e. The erection of street furniture, signs, public art and other visible improvements within designated historic districts of a magnitude or in numbers such that the cumulative impact does not allow for the issuance of a certificate of no negative effect. The Community Development Director may determine that an application for work on a designated historic property involving multiple categories of minor development may result in the cumulative impact such that it is considered a major development. In such cases, the applicant shall apply for a major development review in accordance with Subsection 26.415.07.D. 26 Page 2 of 5 Relevant Historic Preservation Design Guidelines & Findings The applicant requests a Certificate of Appropriateness for Minor Development for the purposes of replacing wood shingle roofing material with standing-seam sheet-metal roofing material. Chapter 7: Roofs Finding 7.7 Preserve original roof materials. • Avoid removing historic roofing material. • Using recognized preservation methods, repair deteriorated historic material when possible. • When replacement is necessary, replace the roofing in kind, and/or use a material that is similar to the original in both style as well as physical qualities. Not Met 7.8 New or replacement roof materials should maintain or restore the character of the historic roof. • If a substitute is used, the roof material should be of a design, scale, color, texture, and composition akin to the original, or a simplified, neutral, modest, and deferential alternative that is visually compatible with the building’s historic features. • Flashing should be in scale with the roof material. • Flashing should be tin, lead coated copper, galvanized or painted metal and have a matte, non-reflective finish. • Design flashing, such as drip edges, so that architectural details are not obscured. • A metal roof material should have a matte, non-reflective finish and match the original seaming. Not Met 7.9 Avoid using conjectural features on a roof. • Adding ornament or detail where there is no evidence that they existed, creates a false impression of the building’s original appearance, and is inappropriate. • Roofing materials should reflect the architectural style of the affected building or be substantiated by documentary or physical evidence. Not Met Chapter 10: New Additions Finding 10.3 A new addition must be compatible with the historic character of the primary building. • An addition must be subordinate, deferential, modest, and secondary in comparison to the architectural character of the primary building. • An addition that imitates the primary building’s historic style is not allowed. For example, a new faux Victorian detailed addition is inappropriate on an Aspen Victorian home. • An addition that covers historically significant features is inappropriate. • Proposals on corner lots require particular attention to creating compatibility. Not Met 27 Page 3 of 5 10.4 The historic resource is to be the focus of the property, the entry point, and the predominant structure as viewed from the street. • The historic resource must be visually dominant on the site and must be distinguishable against the addition. • The total above grade floor area of an addition may be no more than 100% of the above grade floor area of the original historic resource. All other above grade development must be completely detached. HPC may consider exceptions to this policy if two or more of the following are met: o The proposed addition is all one story. o The footprint of the new addition is closely related to the footprint of the historic resource and the proposed design is particularly sensitive to the scale and proportions of the historic resource. o The project involves the demolition and replacement of an older addition that is considered to have been particularly detrimental to the historic resource. o The interior of the resource is fully utilized, containing the same number of usable floors as existed historically. o The project is on a large lot, allowing the addition to have a significant setback from the street. o There are no variance requests in the application other than those related to historic conditions that aren’t being changed. o The project is proposed as part of a voluntary AspenModern designation, or o The property is affected by non-preservation related site-specific constraints such as trees that must be preserved, Environmentally Sensitive Areas review, etc. Not Met 28 Page 4 of 5 10.6 Design a new addition to be recognized as a product of its own time. • An addition shall be distinguishable from the historic building and still be visually compatible with historic features. • A change in setbacks of the addition from the historic building, a subtle change in material, or a modern interpretation of a historic style are all techniques that may be considered to help define a change from historic construction to new construction. • Do not reference historic styles that have no basis in Aspen. • Consider these three aspects of an addition; form, materials, and fenestration. An addition must relate strongly to the historic resource in at least two of these elements. Departing from the historic resource in one of these categories allows for creativity and a contemporary design response. • Note that on a corner lot, departing from the form of the historic resource may not be allowed. • There is a spectrum of appropriate solutions to distinguishing new from old portions of a development. Some resources of particularly high significance or integrity may not be the right instance for a contrasting addition. Not Met Staff Findings: Chapters 7 and 10 of the Historic Preservation Design Guidelines are particularly relevant to this application for a Certificate of Appropriateness for Minor Development at 117 N Sixth St. Whereas the guidelines in Chapter 7 directly apply to the replacement of roofing material, Chapter 10 provides important context within which to consider the appropriateness of the proposal. Where wood shingle is the original, existing, and presumably only roofing material atop the historic resource, installing a matte black metal shingle roofing material does not meet Guideline 7.7. The proposed material is neither an in-kind replacement, nor “similar to the original in both style as well as physical qualities.” Insofar as it does not “maintain or restore the character of the historic roof,” large, smooth, black metal shingles similarly fails to meet Guideline 7.8. This material is neither “of a design, scale, color, texture, and composition akin to the original,” nor “a simplified, neutral, modest, and deferential alternative.” The 8⅛-inch wide, 11¼-inch long, stark black, smooth metal contrasts and is incompatible with the building’s historic wood features. Documentary evidence (i.e., Sanborn maps and photographs) gives no indication that the historic resource at 117 N. Sixth St. has ever had a roofing material other than wood shingle. Although wood shingles and (to a lesser extent) standing-seam metal were common roofing materials on Victorian-era miner’s cottages in Aspen, large, smooth, black metal shingles have to apparent president and do not reflect the architectural style of the affected building. Instead, this material better reflects the more post-modern, contemporary architectural style of the non-historic addition that dominates the lot and the smooth black metal roofing that ties it to the historic resource. The proposed metal shingle roofing, therefore, does not meet Guideline 7.9. 29 Page 5 of 5 Albeit worded to guide the development of a new addition to a historic resource, Chapter 10 of the Historic Preservation Design Guidelines essentially describes characteristics of an appropriate relationship between historic and non-historic development. To avoid (re)litigating the merits of the existing non-historic addition, this assessment regards it as important context for assessing the proposal to install large, smooth, black metal shingles atop the historic resource. For the new addition “to be recognized as a product of its own time” as called for by Guideline 10.6, the historic resource must at least be “distinguishable against the addition” pursuant to Guideline 10.4. Although Guideline 10.6 mentions “there is a spectrum of appropriate solutions to distinguishing new from old portions of a development,” installing similar roofing material is not one of them. Accordingly, Guideline 10.3 explicitly disallows “an addition that imitates the primary building’s historic style.” Presuming that it is equally, if not more, inappropriate to alter a historic building to imitate a non-historic addition’s style, large, smooth, black metal shingles are a particularly unsubtle roofing material for the miner’s cottage at 117 N. Sixth St. The proposal does not meet Guidelines 10.3, 10.4, and 10.6. Staff Recommendation: Staff recommend denial of this application for a Certificate of Appropriateness for Minor Development. 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 HPC Minor Review App Checklist item 9 Roof replacement 117 N 6th st Cabin only Pacific Sheet Metal Inc. Manufacturing Post Office Box 70 Warehouse, Yard Carbondale, CO 81623 80 Gemat Circle 970.963.6563 Phone Rifle, CO 81650 970.963.6564 Fax dave@teampsm.com www.teampsm.com Project Manager Page 1 of 2 Initial:________ s JOB NAME JOB ADDRESS 117 N 6th Street 117 N 6th Street, Aspen, CO 81611 Standing Seam Metal Roofing: to Include Approx. 1,450 Sq. Ft. • Remove and dispose of existing roof materials. • Furnish and install Carlisle WIP 300 HT Ice and Water Shield to the entire roof. • Furnish and install Versa Shield for a Class “A” Fire Rated Assembly. • Furnish and install pre-finished metal flashings color TBD. • Furnish and install pre-finished 1” Standing Seam Roof panels color TBD. Price: $40,505.00 Snow Fence: to Include Approx. 180 LF • Furnish and install TRA C-22-Z 2-bar powder Coated clamp-on snow fence at entry and patio areas per code. Price: $14,081.00 Heat Tape Option 1 Exposed HT.: to Include Approx. 350 LF • Furnish and install Heatizon 9-watt per foot heat tape single strand in gutter and downspout with zigs exposed on roof to replace existing. • We estimate the REMP fee to be approx. $7,010.00. • NOTE: Power for, connection of, and controls to be completed by an electrician and is not included in this proposal. Price: $6,191.00 Heat Tape Option 2 Covered HT: to Include Approx. 130 LF of Eave and Valley • Furnish and install Summit Ice Melt eave and valley panels at existing heat tape locations, plus single strand in gutter and downspout using 12 watt per foot heat tape. • Furnish only a 4CDC+Ambient Temperature Controller. • We estimate the REMP fee to be approx. $8,478.00 • NOTE: Power for, connection of, and controls to be completed by an electrician and is not included in this proposal. Price: $22,336.00 Gutter and Downspout: to Include Approx. 25 LF • Furnish and install approx. 15 LF of 6” half round pre-finished gutter with approx. 10 LF of 3” round downspout to replace existing. Price: $752.00 Permit fees will be billed at cost once determined by the Building Department, this is not part of the price listed. Brikor Associates 20 Sunset Dr #1 Basalt, CO 81621 970-618-2091 Attn: Steve steve@brikor.com September 26, 2023 We appreciate the opportunity to submit this proposal for the above referenced project based on our site visit and offer the following to define and clarify the scope of our proposal. 46 Pacific Sheet Metal Inc. Manufacturing Post Office Box 70 Warehouse, Yard Carbondale, CO 81623 80 Gemat Circle 970.963.6563 Phone Rifle, CO 81650 970.963.6564 Fax dave@teampsm.com www.teampsm.com Project Manager Page 2 of 2 Initial:________ Substrate Exclusion: Any damaged or deteriorated substrate, or decking will be replaced on a time and material basis. SNOW REMOVAL PRICING: $90.00/HR/MAN Oil Canning Disclaimer: By signing this document, all parties acknowledge that oil canning is an inherent property of metal panel roofing, siding and fascia and is not a cause for rejection. Roofing Exclusions: Snow and ice removal, demolition of any kind, horizontal and vertical waterproofing, interior flashings, window and door flashings, through wall flashings, all woodwork other than that listed above, insulation other than that listed above, eave and valley snow and ice melt systems other than listed above, gutters and downspouts other than listed above, saw cutting, asbestos removal or mitigation, mold removal or mitigation, ice dams and damage caused by ice dams, liquidated damages, bonds, permits and fees, and all non-related metal sheet goods. Vibrations may occur during the re-roofing process. Pacific Sheet Metal is not responsible for interior protection from dust and debris or other interior damage that may occur due to vibrations during the re-roof installation. Price Acceleration Provision: If there is an increase in the actual cost of the labor or materials charged to the Contractor is more than 5% subsequent to making this Agreement, the price set forth in this Agreement shall be increased without the need for a written change order or amen dment to the contract to reflect the price increase and additional direct cost to the Contractor. Contractor will submit written documentation of the increased charges to the Prime Contractor/Owner upon request. As an additional remedy, if the actual cos t of any line item increases more than 10% subsequent to the making of this Agreement, Contractor, at its sole discretion, may terminate the contract for convenience. Material Availability Provision: Due to material shortages, customer may experience delays related to the inability to timely obtain material for this project. In the event of such a delay, Contractor shall notify customer, and customer agrees to provide contractor with an extension of ti me for any delay attributable to the temporary inability to obtain materials. Unless specifically noted above, there are no additional terms presumed to be included in this proposal. Homeowner: A 50% deposit is required upon acceptance, once this has been received materials will be ordered. Contractor: Progress billing to Contractor according to an agreed schedule shall be paid periodically based on percentage of work completed, within 30 days of submitting invoice. If retainage is required, it shall not exceed 10% of the total contract. Final payment shall be made no later than 30 days after completion of Pacific Sheet Metal’s work. All material is guaranteed to be as specified. All work to be completed in a workmanlike manner according to standard practic es. Any alterations or deviation from above specifications will become an extra charge over and above the estimate. All agreements contingent upon strikes, accidents, or delays beyond our control. Property owner to carry, fire, tornado, and other necessary insurance. Our workers are fully covered by Workmen’s Compensation Insurance. Note: Due to continual price increases this proposal will be withdrawn if it is not accepted within 10 business days. Color selection is required upon proposal acceptance. Acceptance of Proposal: The above prices, specifications and conditions are satisfactory and are hereby accepted. You are authorized to do work as specified. Payment will be made as outlined above. Authorized Signature_______________________________________ 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 Pacific Sheet Metal Inc. Manufacturing Post Office Box 70 Warehouse, Yard Carbondale, CO 81623 80 Gemat Circle 970.963.6563 Phone Rifle, CO 81650 970.963.6564 Fax www.pacificsheetmetal.net Brikor 117 N 6th Street Aspen, CO 81611 Berridge (pg. 2-6) WIP 300 Ice & Water Shield (pg. 7-8) VersaShield PDS (pg. 9-10) TRA Snow and Sun Snow Stop PDS (pg. 11) Heatizon Gutter Melt Cable (pg. 12-15) Standing Seam Profile (pg. 16) Gutter & Downspout Profile (pg. 17-18) PSM Sample Workmanship Warranty (pg. 19-21) 65 ArcelorMittal Solutions in SteelTM for Construction Unpainted GalvalumeTM Steel Fact Sheet A Superior Building Material ArcelorMittal GalvalumeTM is a coated steel product that has proven its superior performance as a building material in extended field testing in a diverse range of corrosive environments. Its unique combination of durability, edge protection, and resistance to corrosion is at least twice that of galvanized steel. ArcelorMittal produces Galvalume coated steel sheet in the US and Canada and is the exclusive producer in Canada. The Galvalume coating is an alloy composed of 55% aluminum and approximately 45% zinc by weight. It is applied on both sides of cold-rolled steel sheet using a precise continuous hot dip process. The result is a highly corrosion resistant coated steel that combines the barrier protection and extended durability of aluminum with the galvanic protection of zinc. Galvalume also offers exceptional heat reflectivity properties, resulting in a lower energy load on buildings and improved interior comfort. From an aesthetic perspective, the fine spangle and gentle sheen of unpainted Galvalume offers a very attractive appearance. Product Characteristics Proven Superior Corrosion Resistance Galvalume steel sheet can be expected to provide at least twice the service life of traditional zinc-coatings of similar coating thickness under the same exposure conditions. This has been proven by actual exposure tests using flat coupon samples, conducted over 36 years in the U.S.A. and 15 years in Canada. The tests covered a variety of environments ranging from rural to severe marine. The following chart, comparing the performance of Galvalume and galvanized of equal coating thickness, shows that Galvalume has at least twice the service life versus galvanized. Superior Cut Edge Protection The aluminum and zinc in the coating combine to prevent corrosion at exposed edges. The zinc component of the Galvalume coating provides galvanic cut edge protection, while the aluminum component remains as a continuing barrier to corrosion. Heat Reflectivity and Solar Reflectance (Energy Efficiency) Bare, unpainted Galvalume has undergone extensive testing by the Oak Ridge National Laboratory (ORNL), to determine its solar reflective performance. Test results have qualified Galvalume as an approved roof product by the U.S. EPA – ENERGY STAR Program, for both low-slope and high- slope applications. On newly manufactured Galvalume, heat reflectivity was rated above the minimum U.S. EPA requirement of 0.65. For 0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 Projected Galvanize Galvalume RuralIndustrialMarineSevere Marine weathered roofs over three years of age, the overall solar reflectance also exceeded the minimum U.S. EPA requirement of 0.50 for maintenance reflectivity. Enhanced Surface Treatment ArcelorMittal offers a variety of surface treatments suited to specific manufacturing and application needs. For unpainted applications, bare Galvalume Plus™ is available. Galvalume Plus has a clear, organic resin coating applied to both sides of Galvalume steel sheet, can be roll- formed without lubricants, and is delivered to the job site with an oil-free surface. See our Fact Sheet on Galvalume Plus for more information. Unpainted Galvalume can also be passivated with a chemical treatment. With this treatment, Galvalume must be oiled with either vanishing or slushing oil. If color is specified, Galvalume steel sheet can be ordered as prepainted coil. This option offers an additional layer of paint protection in a wide assortment of attractive colors and paint systems. See our Fact Sheet on Prepainted Galvalume Steel for more information. Applications Galvalume has many proven applications in Commercial, Industrial, Institutional, Agricultural, and Residential Construction. Low-slope structural roofing• High-slope architectural roofing• Cladding and siding• Quonset Buildings• Pre-engineered Steel Buildings• Building Accessories• Construction Tubular• Structural Steel Framing• Appliance Components• Automotive Parts• Service Life (Years To First Red Rust) 66 ArcelorMittal Dofasco P.O. Box 2460 Hamilton, ON L8N 3J5 ArcelorMittal USA 1 South Dearborn St. Chicago, IL 60603 t 1-800-363-2726 e customer_inquiries@dofasco.ca t 1-800-422-9422 e constructioninquiries@arcelormittal.ca www.arcelormittal.com Points to Remember Compatibility with Dissimilar Metals All materials that can be used in contact with galvanized steel sheet can be used with complete safety in contact with Galvalume. However, as with galvanized, contact of lead or copper with Galvalume steel must be avoided, as it can result in accelerated corrosion. Galvalume and galvanized can be combined on the same building project, although it is not advisable because galvanized will likely exhibit corrosion before Galvalume. As a design practice, when both materials are in contact, always use Galvalume downstream from unpainted galvanized steel, otherwise accelerated corrosion of the galvanized can occur. Handling and Storage To preserve the surface, handling should only be carried out using clean, dry gloves. Do not slide sheets over rough surfaces or each other. As with galvanized or painted steel products, bundles of Galvalume steel sheets or products made from Galvalume steel in all finishes must be kept dry in transit. After transit, material should then be covered and stored off the ground, at a slight angle, to prevent water or condensation from being trapped between adjacent sheet surfaces. If the bundles become wet, sheets should be separated, wiped with a clean cloth without delay and then placed so that air circulation completes the drying process. These procedures are recommended to avoid possible deterioration of the coating, which could result in non-uniform appearance. Joining and Sealing Recommended fasteners to be used on Galvalume steel sheet should have washers made of Neoprene or a similar material. (See table below). Fasteners containing lead or copper should not be used. Lead headed nails and lead washers should also not be used on Galvalume. For sealing, neutral cure silicone sealants should be used. Sealants containing acetic acid or amines should not be used on Galvalume steel. Check with your sealant supplier for brand name recommendations. Product Availability Sizes Available Thickness: 0.012” (0.30mm) to 0.090” (2.28mm) Width: 49.5” (1257mm) maximum Qualities ASTM A792/792M Commercial Steel Structural Steel Special Forming Steel Helical Steel Standard Coating Weights (Minimum Triple Spot) AZ30, AZ50, AZ55, AZ60, & AZ 70 (0.30, 0.50, 0.55, 0.60, & 0.70 oz/ft2 respectively) AZM100, AZM150, AZM165, AZM180, & AZM210 (100, 150, 165, 180, & 210 g/ m2 respectively) Galvalume sheet steel can also be ordered as a prepainted coil. Prepainted Galvalume offers an additional layer of paint protection in a wide assortment of attractive colours and paint systems. See our Fact Sheet on Prepainted Galvalume steel for more information. Special Customer Note: The Information in this Fact Sheet is provided for the general guidance of customers and does not imply any warranty. Information provided is based on research conducted by ArcelorMittal and other organizations. Interpretation and/or use of this information is the sole responsibility of the user. TM – ArcelorMittal (Logo/Slogan) is a trademark of ArcelorMittal. TM - Solutions in Steel is a trademark of ArcelorMittal Dofasco. TM - Galvalume is a trademark of ArcelorMittal in Canada, and a trademark of BIEC International Inc. in the United States. Guidelines for Selection of Fasteners for use with Prepainted Galvalume Steel Sheet Rural Atmosphere 300 Series stainless steel1. or 300 Series capped- stainless steel washer combination Aluminum-zinc alloy cast2. or capped head used with neoprene-coated aluminum or Type 303 stainless washer Nylon capped head over3. zinc coated carbon steel shank 1.0 mil zinc coated steel,4. with additional organic or inorganic coating Moderate Industrial Atmostphere 300 Series stainless steel1. or 300 Series capped- stainless steel washer combination Aluminum-zinc alloy cast2. or capped head used with neoprene-coated aluminum or Type 303 stainless washer Nylon capped head over3. zinc coated carbon steel shank 1.6 mil zinc coated steel,4. with additional organic or inorganic coating Heavy Industrial or Marine Atmosphere 300 Series stainless steel1. or 300 Series capped- stainless steel washer combination Aluminum-zinc alloy cast2. or capped head used with neoprene-coated aluminum or Type 303 stainless washer Nylon capped head over3. zinc coated carbon steel shank 1.6 mil zinc coated steel,4. with additional organic or inorganic coating 67 All Berridge applied colors are premium fluoropolymer coatings produced with full strength Kynar 500® or Hylar 5000® resin. This coating affords maximum exterior durability due to its outstanding weatherability and resistance to ultraviolet radiation. The factory applied coating is fully warranted for 20 years against cracking, peeling and fading (not to exceed 5 N.B.S. units). These are the highest quality exterior finishes available among competitive products. Berridge Metallic Finishes Metallic colors are processed and finished on Berridge’s continuous coil-coating line. These proprietary finishes are available for all factory products, flat sheet and coil. Flat sheets and coils in metallic finishes are available to sheet metal companies for fabrication of special profiles, shapes or flashing. Metallic colors are directional and paint lot sensitive. Large orders should be placed at the same time to avoid mixing paint lots. Berridge Metallic Finishes* include: Copper-Cote™ Antique Copper-Cote Champagne Zinc-Cote™ Preweathered Galvalume® Lead-Cote™ * Metallic and Premium Finishes require a nominal surcharge. Acrylic-Coated Galvalume Acrylic-Coated Galvalume® (ACG) is a coated sheet product that combines the corrosion resistance of Galvalume® steel sheet with a clear acrylic coating that is applied over Galvalume® substrate. The surface treatment is essentially invisible but it provides excellent characteristics to enhance the fabrication, performance and aesthetics of the installed Galvalume. These enhancements include: good roll-formability without the need for oils, excellent transit and field-storage performance without staining, dramatic decrease in finger printing or foot printing during installation and long term surface brightness when exposed to the environment. It is applied at the mill by roll-coating a uniform, thin film of a water-base acrylic solution onto both surfaces of the sheet. Coating System Berridge owns and operates its own modern continuous coil coating line in San Antonio, Texas, painting both 48” and 42” wide master coils. Notes: 1. Special colors and finishes are available. Please consult Berridge for pricing and delivery. 2. Berridge metallic and premium finishes require a nominal surcharge. 3. Galvalume® is a registered trademark of BIEC International, Inc. 4. Kynar 500® is a registered trademark of Arkema, Inc. 5. Hylar 5000® is a registered trademark of Solvay Solexis. Specifications for all 24 & 22 Gauge* Galvalume® & 0.032 & 0.040 Aluminum* Berridge Sheet Metal Products A. Prefinished metal shall be Aluminum-Zinc Alloy Coated (AZ-50 Galvalume®) Steel Sheet, 24-Gauge or 22-Gauge*, ASTM 792, Grade 40, yield strength 40 ksi min. or 3105 Alloy Aluminum Sheet 0.032 or 0.040*, ASTM B209, H14 temper, yield strength 21 ksi min. B. Finish shall be full strength Kynar 500® or Hylar 5000® fluoropolymer coating applied by the manufacturer on a continuous coil coating line, with a top side dry film thickness of 0.75 ± 0.05 mil over 0.20 ± 0.05 mil prime coat, to provide a total top side dry film thickness of 0.95 ± 0.10 mil. Bottom side shall be coated with a primer (non-metallics only) and beige urethane coating with a total dry film thickness of 0.35 ± 0.05 mil. Finish shall conform to all tests for adhesion, flexibility and longevity as specified by the Kynar 500® or Hylar 5000® finish supplier. C. Strippable film shall be applied to the top side of all prefinished metal to protect the finish during fabrication, shipping and field handling. This strippable film MUST be removed immediately before installation. D. Unpainted metal shall be Aluminum-Zinc Alloy Coated (AZ-55 Acrylic Coated Galvalume®) Steel Sheet, 24-Gauge or 22-Gauge*, ASTM 792, Grade 40, yield strength 40 ksi min., with clear acrylic coating on both sides of material. E. Field protection must be provided by the contractor at the job site so stacked or coiled material is not exposed to weather and moisture. F. Flashing may be factory fabricated or field fabricated. Unless otherwise specified, all exposed adjacent flashing shall be of the same material and finish as panel system. Note: The rolling process of sheet metal results in inherent surface unevenness referred to as “oil-canning”. This condition is also caused by several factors including thermal expansion and contraction, dark colors, both medium and high-gloss finishes and uneven substrate. “Oil-canning” in itself is not sufficient cause for material rejection. * Not all products and colors are available in 22-Gauge or Aluminum substrate. Consult Berridge for product and color availability. For complete specifications visit www.berridge.com Protective Strippable Film (painted material only) 0.75 ± 0.05 mil Kynar 500® Hylar 5000® top coat 0.20 ± 0.05 mil primer coat 24 gauge or 22 gauge Galvalume® or 0.032 or 0.040 Aluminum substrate 0.35 ± 0.05 mil total dry film thickness for primer coat (non-metallics only) Beige urethane backer coat (all colors) BERRIDGE FINISHES AND MATERIAL SPECIFICATIONS All information subject to change without notice. See website for details, specifications and Watertightness Warranty requirements.68 BERRIDGE MANUFACTURING COMPANY KYNAR 500® HYLAR 5000® COLOR FINISHES Teal Green Bristol BlueColonial Red Matte Black Evergreen Zinc Grey Burgundy Cityscape Hemlock Green Deep Red Hartford Green Charcoal Grey Forest GreenPatina Green Shasta White Award Blue Copper-Cote™ Zinc-Cote™Preweathered Galvalume® Antique Copper-Cote Champagne Lead-Cote™ Natural White Aged Bronze Parchment Dark BronzeCopper Brown Terra-Cotta Royal Blue Almond Premium Colors Acrylic-Coated Galvalume® Berridge premium colors require a nominal surcharge. Metallic Colors Standard Colors Berridge metallic colors are premium finishes which require a nominal surcharge. Natural Metal Finish Berridge Acrylic-Coated Galvalume® is a coated sheet product that combines the corrosion resistance of Galvalume® steel sheet with a clear, organic resin applied to the top side and bottom side of Galvalume® substrate. (210) 650-3050 www.berridge.com Energy Star is only valid in the United States. Sierra Tan Buckskin Medium Bronze Please consult the BMC Technical department at Technical@Berridge.com for LEED and Energy Star compliance information. Due to limitations in the printing process, please request actual color chips for accurate color viewing. 69 B erridge S tock A vA il AB ility A nd c olor d etA il S Testing results for Kynar 500®/Hylar 5000® coil coating applications: ŸSpecular Gloss: (ASTM D-523) Low and medium gloss only ŸColor Uniformity: (ASTM D-2244) Color controlled both instrumentally and visually ŸDry Film Thickness: (ASTM D-7091, ASTM D-1005, NCCA 11-13, 11-14, 11-15) Primer 0.20 ± 0.05 mil, Topcoat 0.75 ± 0.05 mil ŸHardness: (ASTM D-3363, NCCA 11-12, Eagle Turquoise Pencils) HB Minimum ŸAdhesion (X-Cut): (ASTM D-3359) No adhesion loss ŸAdhesion (Crosshatch): (ASTM D-3359) No adhesion loss ŸAbrasion Coefficient: (ASTM D-968) 100 liters/mil topcoat ŸDirect Impact Flexibility: (ASTM D-2794, Gardner Impact Tester, 1/10” Distortion) Excellent, no removal ŸReverse Impact Flexibility: (NCCA Spec. 11, ASTM D-2794, Gardner Impact Tester, 5/8” ball Impact force in inch pounds equal to metal thickness) Excellent, no cracking or loss of adhesion ŸFormability: (ASTM D-4145, 180° T-Bend on 1/8 Mandrel) No cracks or loss of adhesion ŸErosion: (20 years, 45° South Florida) Maximum 15% loss ŸHumidity Resistance: (ASTM D-2247) Passes 2000 hours on Galvalume® and 4000 hours on Aluminum ŸAcid Resistance: (ASTM D-1308, Proc. 3.1.1, 10% Sulfuric Acid spot test, 24 hour exposure) Excellent, no effect ŸSalt Spray Resistance: (ASTM B-117) Passes 2000 hours on Galvalume® and 4000 hours on Aluminum ŸAlkali Resistance: (ASTM D-1308, Proc. 5.2, 10% Sodium Hydroxide, 24 hour exposure) Excellent, no effect ŸDetergent Resistance: (ASTM D-2248, 72 hours immersion in 3% solution at 100°F) Excellent, no effect ŸResistance to Acid Pollutants: (ASTM D 1308 Proc. 3.1.1, 24 hour exposure 10% HNO3 vapors) Excellent, no effect ŸWeathering - Color Retention: (ASTM D-2244, 20 years, 45° South Florida) Maximum 5 NBS units color change ŸWeathering - Chalk Resistance: (ASTM D-4214, 20 years, 45° South Florida) Not worse than No. 8 rating Notes: 1. ASTM - American Society for Testing Materials 2. NCCA - National Coil Coaters Association 3. Galvalume® is 55% Aluminum-Zinc alloy coated sheet steel and is a registered trademark of BIEC International Inc. BERRIDGE MANUFACTURING COMPANYCorporate & Sales Headquarters 2610 Harry Wurzbach San Antonio, TX 78209210-650-3050 • Fax 210-650-0379 **Berridge California and Florida Sales Corporations are separate entities from Berridge Manufacturing Company Standard Colors 24 Gauge 22 Gauge*0.032 Aluminum*0.040 Aluminum*SR EM SRI48”42”48”42”48”42”48”42” Aged Bronze S S S N S N S N/A 0.30 0.86 30 Almond S S S N S N S N/A 0.65 0.83 77 Bristol Blue S S N N N N N N/A 0.33 0.85 33 Buckskin S S S N N N N N/A 0.32 0.83 32 Burgundy S S N N N N N N/A 0.29 0.85 29 Charcoal Grey S S S N N N N N/A 0.31 0.84 30 Cityscape S S N N N N N N/A 0.48 0.85 54 Colonial Red S S N N N N N N/A 0.33 0.85 34 Copper Brown S S N N N N N N/A 0.30 0.85 29 Dark Bronze S S S N S N S N/A 0.28 0.85 27 Deep Red S S N N N N N N/A 0.39 0.84 41 Evergreen S S N N N N N N/A 0.30 0.83 29 Forest Green S S S N N N N N/A 0.25 0.83 22 Hartford Green S S N N N N N N/A 0.28 0.83 26 Hemlock Green S S N N N N N N/A 0.31 0.83 30 Matte Black S S N N N N N N/A 0.26 0.89 26 Medium Bronze S S S N S N S N/A 0.31 0.85 31 Parchment S S S N S N S N/A 0.52 0.83 58 Patina Green S S N N N N N N/A 0.34 0.86 36 Royal Blue S S N N N N N N/A 0.26 0.85 25 Shasta White S S S N S N S N/A 0.60 0.84 70 Sierra Tan S S S N S N S N/A 0.39 0.85 42 Teal Green S S N N N N N N/A 0.27 0.87 27 Terra - Cotta S S N N N N N N/A 0.32 0.83 31 Zinc Grey S S S N S N S N/A 0.39 0.85 42 Acrylic-Coated Galvalume®S S S S N/A N/A N/A N/A 0.67 0.20 59 Premium Colors* Award Blue S S N N N N N N/A 0.17 0.83 11 Natural White S S N N N N N N/A 0.76 0.84 93 Metallic Colors* Antique Copper-Cote S S N N N N N N/A 0.33 0.84 34 Champagne S S N N N N N N/A 0.40 0.85 43 Copper-Cote™S S N N N N N N/A 0.51 0.85 59 Lead-Cote™S S N N N N N N/A 0.46 0.84 50 Preweathered Galvalume®S S N N N N N N/A 0.40 0.85 43 Zinc-Cote™S S N N N N N N/A 0.53 0.83 59 Spring 2018 - Berridge Color Chart - 15M Printed in the U.S.A. S - Stock Color N - Non-Stocking Color N/A - Not Available BMC HOUSTONBRANCH FACILITY1720 Maury St.Houston, TX 77026713-223-4971Fax: 713-236-9422 BMC ATLANTABRANCH FACILITY319 Lee Industrial Blvd. Austell, GA 30168770-941-5141Fax: 770-941-7344 BMC CHICAGOBRANCH FACILITY1175 Carolina Dr.W. Chicago, IL 60185630-231-7495Fax: 630-231-7520 BERRIDGE CALIFORNIA SALES CORPORATION**8442 Sultana Ave.Fontana, CA 92335562-402-2081Fax: 562-865-7878 Manufacturing Facility2201 Rudeloff Rd. Seguin, TX 78155 830-401-5200 • Fax: 830-303-0530 BMC SAN ANTONIOBRANCH FACILITY 6515 Fratt Rd.San Antonio, TX 78218210-650-3050Fax: 210-650-0379 BMC PHOENIXBRANCH FACILITY5717 W. Washington St.Phoenix, AZ 85043602-385-1237Fax: 210-650-0379 BMC DENVERBRANCH FACILITY7505 E. 41st Ave.Denver, CO 80216303-322-3703Fax: 303-322-3810 BMC KANSAS CITYBRANCH FACILITY1235 Southwest Blvd.Kansas City, KS 66103913-227-0855Fax: 210-650-0379 BMC DALLASBRANCH FACILITY2015 California Crossing Dallas, TX 75220972-506-8496Fax: 972-506-8478 BMC OKLAHOMA CITYBRANCH FACILITY1400 Exchange Ave.Oklahoma City, OK 73108405-248-7404Fax: 210-650-0379 S Stock Color; Not subject to a minimum order N Non-Stock Color; Subject to inventory on hand; 4,500 sf minimum order for 22 Gauge and 0.032 & 0.040 Aluminum N/A Not Available * Consult BMC on product availability for 22 Gauge and 0.032 and 0.040 Aluminum. Premium and Metallic colors are subject to a surcharge, contact BMC for additional information BERRIDGE FLORIDASALES CORPORATION**8802 Venture Cove Tampa, FL 33637813-335-4505Fax: 210-650-0379 BMC RALEIGHBRANCH FACILITY1100 Corporation Pkwy #129Raleigh, NC 27610919-537-5705Fax: 210-650-0379 www.berridge.com 70 300 HT WATER & ICE PROTECTION HIGH-TEMPERATURE PROTECTION WIP 300HT High-Temperature Protection Self-Adhering Roofi ng Underlayment WIP 300HT is a high-tensile-strength rubberized asphalt underlayment specifi cally designed to withstand temperatures up to 250°F (121°C). Ideal for use under metal including copper, zinc and COR-TEN® (consult technical department for installation instructions), WIP 300HT can also be used under synthetic, concrete and clay tiles and asphalt shingles. This strong, skid-resistant membrane is available in either black or white and provides superior protection from water penetration caused by wind-driven rain and ice dams. Features and Benefi ts • Protects the roof structure from water seepage caused by ice dams and wind-driven rains • Resists temperatures up to 250°F without degradation of the adhesive • Seals around roofi ng nails, staples and screws • Split-release fi lm provides easier, faster installation • Resists cracking, drying and rotting, providing long-term waterproofi ng performance and low lifecycle cost • Concealed waterproofi ng system will not detract from the architectural aesthetics of the primary roofi ng system • Exposed rubberized asphalt bead along the membrane edge ensures watertightness of lap seams • 180 days exposure time Standards • UL Classifi ed • ICC-ES ESR #2206 • 2009, 2012, and 2015 International Building Code™ • Florida Building Code Approved Product #6785 • Meets ASTM D1970 • Miami-Dade County Product Control Approved • ASTM E108/UL 790 Class A Fire Resistance • 2016 California Green Building Standards, Title 24 • 2015, 2012, and 2008 ICC 700 National Green Building Standard Storage WIP 300HT roofi ng underlayment rolls should be stored on their side, under cover and in areas where the temperature is between 40° and 100°F (4.4° and 38°C). Do not double-stack pallets. Warranty Carlisle WIP products are backed by Carlisle’s industry-leading warranty. Carlisle WIP Products will display optimal performance when stored under recommended conditions and used within one year of date of manufacture. Product installed after one year of date of manufacture is not covered under defect warranty. Visit our website for warranty details. Installation WIP 300HT underlayment is applied when the roof deck is dry and the substrate temperature is 40°F (4.4°C) or higher. At temperatures below 40°F, nailing or priming should be used to temporarily hold the membrane in place while adhesion develops. WIP 300HT is designed to be covered with the primary roofi ng system and should not be exposed to sunlight for more than 60 days (black fi lm only). White underlayment offers exposure time of 180 days. Substrate must be free of any moisture. If moisture is present, it may inhibit adhesion. Prepare the roof deck by removing all loose objects, dirt, dust and debris. For re-roofi ng applications, remove all old materials from the roof deck in the area to be covered with WIP 300HT underlayment. Replace water-damaged sheathing and sweep roof deck thoroughly. 71 Priming Priming is not required on clean, dry wood, metal or most polyisocyanurate surfaces (polyiso paper facer does require priming). Masonry and exterior gypsum boards (such as DensDeck®) should be primed using an appropriate primer or adhesive. Some rigid insulation boards with porous or dusty surfaces may require priming to promote initial adhesion. Priming is required on all substrates when air or substrate temperatures are below 40°F (4.4°C). Adhesives such as CCW-702, CCW-702WB, CAV-GRIP™ and CCW-AWP are approved for use with WIP products. Refer to your local building codes to determine acceptable product for use in your region. Selection of roof deck or insulation substrate and/or use of a primer or adhesive are the responsibility of the architect, specifi er or roofi ng contractor to determine based on the roof assembly and environmental conditions. Valleys, Hips & Ridges Cut WIP 300HT roofi ng underlayment into manageable lengths. Align over the center of the valley, hip or ridge. Remove release fi lm. Press the middle of the membrane fi rst before working toward the edges. For open valleys, cover WIP 300HT roofi ng underlayment with metal valley liners. Eaves & Rakes Cut WIP 300HT underlayment into 10–15' pieces. Remove 2–3' of release fi lm and align the edge of the membrane, sticky side down, so it overhangs the drip edge by 3⁄8" (10 mm). Continue to remove release fi lm and press as you move across the roof. Use a hand roller and/or hand pressure to press into place. Overlap end laps a minimum of 6". WIP roofi ng underlayment should reach a point 2' inside the interior wall line. Local codes may require additional courses. If additional courses are required, the top lap must be at least 3½". Drip Edges At the rake edge, apply WIP 300HT underlayment fi rst and place drip edge on top. At the eave, apply drip edge fi rst and place WIP underlayment on top of the drip edge so that it overhangs drip edge by 3⁄8" (10 mm). For standard installation details, follow the WIP detail drawings. For non-standard installation instructions, contact your local Carlisle WIP representative. Metal Roof Underlayment Under water-shedding metal roof systems or low-slope metal roofs with a minimum ½" slope, start at the low point and apply WIP 300HT over the full surface of the roof deck. Review the metal roofi ng manufacturer’s instructions for limitations and precautions. Beginning at the eaves, apply underlayment from the low point to the high point of the roof, running the roll horizontally. Lap Edges Lap edge seams should be hand rolled to ensure maximum adhesion. Carlisle, WIP and CAV-GRIP are trademarks of Carlisle. DensDeck is a registered trademark of Georgia-Pacifi c. © 2019 Carlisle. 605059 - WIP 300HT Sell Sheet - 07.16.19 PRODUCT SPECIFICATIONS PHYSICAL PROPERTIES Surface Black/White Engineered Polyolefi n Composite Film with Factory-applied Anti-skid Coating Membrane Rubberized Asphalt PRODUCT CHARACTERISTIC UNITS RESULTS Roll Length feet 66 Roll Weight lbs 55 Roll Size sq ft 198 Roll Width inches 36 TYPICAL PERFORMANCE PROPERTIES TEST METHOD RESULTS Thickness ASTM D1970 40 mils Low Temperature Flexibility ASTM D1970 -45°F Adhesion to Plywood at 75°F ASTM D1970 35 lbs/ft Lap Seam Adhesion at 75°F ASTM D1970 21 lbs/ft Sealability Around Nail ASTM D1970 Pass Slip Resistance ASTM D1970 Pass Thermal Stability ASTM D1970 Pass Moisture Vapor Permeance ASTM D1970 0.02 perms Water Absorption ASTM D1970 0.5% Tensile Strength Machine Direction ASTM D412 250 psi Tensile Strength Transverse Direction ASTM D412 1390 psi Elongation at Break Machine Direction ASTM D412 250% Elongation at Break Transverse Direction ASTM D412 170% PACKAGING INFORMATION Boxes (rolls) per pallet 25 WIP 300HT High-Temperature Protection Self-Adhering Roofi ng Underlayment Carlisle WIP Products 1285 Ritner Highway • Carlisle, PA 17013 888.717.1440 www.carlislewipproducts.com Limitations • WIP 300HT should be installed when air, roof deck and membrane temperatures are at or above 40°F (4.4°C). • WIP 300HT should not be left exposed to sunlight for more than 60 days for black membrane or 180 days for white membrane. • WIP 300HT membrane should not be folded over the roof edge unless protected by a gutter or other fl ashing materials. • The primary roof system must be ventilated to prevent excessive moisture build-up in the interior structure. • Use caution during the installation of the membrane as it may become slippery when wet or covered with frost. • WIP 300HT must not to be used in contact with PVC material. • WIP 300HT is not approved for use in foam set tile applications. • WIP 300HT is not designed for wall assemblies. 72 2Roof Deck Protection VersaShield ® Fire-Resistant Roof Deck Protection Help improve your roof system’s fire-resistance while protecting it from damaging moisture with fire-resistant roof deck protection VersaShield® Fire-Resistant Roof Deck Protecton ■ Provides a UL Class A rating on most roof systems1 ■ Helps protect against dangerous flame spread and penetration into the interior ■ Provides a critical layer of extra protection between your roof covering and deck to resist wind-driven rain (or moisture from other sources) that can cause damage to your roof structure 73 We protect what matters most™ Benefits: To learn more about the Lifetime Roofing System visit gaf.com/Lifetime Nominal Specifications: For use with asphaltic shingles, metal, slate, wood. and most other roof systems3 ■ Roll size: 3.5 squares (350 sq. ft. [32.5m2]) (excludes laps) ■ Roll width: 42" (1.07 m) ■ Roll length: 100' (30.48 m) ■ Approx. roll weight: 53 lb. (24 kg) ■ UV exposure: Resists UV degradation for up to 60 days3 ■ Storage: Do NOT double stack pallets. Always protect from moisture, sunlight, and extreme temperatures during storage. Code Approvals and Standards: ■ Meets or exceeds the physical requirements of ASTM D146, D226 Type II, D828, and D4869 Type IV, D6757 Type I or Type II ■ UL Listed1 ■ ICC ESR-2053 ■ ICC AC-160 ■ Miami-Dade County Product Control approved ■ State of Florida approved VersaShield ® Fire-Resistant Roof Deck Protection ■ Superior protection against fire spread and penetration ■ Helps upgrade the UL fire classification of almost any type of roof system, including upgrading most metal roofs to a UL Class A rating1 ■ An efficient fire-resistant slip sheet and roof deck protection all in one product ■ Fiberglass-reinforced so it lies flatter for a better-looking finished roof ■ Slip-resistant walking surface helps improve traction for installers ■ Light color provides a cooler working surface (vs. conventional black felts) ■ Eligible for up to a Lifetime limited warranty when used on Lifetime Shingle roofs2 and it’s an eligible component of GAF residential enhanced warranties marker y copy and AYS set to charts cture and type ©2 0 2 0 G A F 1 / 2 0 • # 1 0 5 • R E S G N 2 2 2 3 6 9 3 7 4 - 1 2 1 9 1 Always refer to Underwriters Laboratories Certifications Directory for actual roof system assemblies 2 See GAF Shingle & Accessory Limited Warranty for complete coverage and restrictions. The word “Lifetime” refers to the length of coverage provided by the GAF Shingle & Accessory Limited Warranty and means as long as the original individual owner(s) of a single-family detached residence [or the second owner(s) in certain circumstances] owns the property where the shingles and accessories are installed. For owners/structures not meeting the above criteria, Lifetime coverage is not applicable. Lifetime Limited Warranty on accessories requires the use of at least three qualifying GAF accessories and the use of Lifetime Shingles. 3 Contact GAF Technical Support at 1-800-766-3411 or visit gaf.com for acceptable non-asphaltic roofing systems and limited warranty coverage. 3 60-day UV resistance refers to standardized testing conducted to ensure the product will not physically degrade when exposed to UV. It is NOT related to withstanding water, snow, or wind. While VersaShield® Fire-Resistant Roof Deck Protection is water resistant, it is NOT WATERPROOF. DO NOT USE VersaShield® Fire-Resistant Roof Deck Protection as a temporary roof to protect property or possessions. * When installed in accordance with section 4.2.1 of GAF ESR-2053, VersaShield® can be used over existing wood shakes or shingles as an alternative of the covering materials specified in 1510.4 of the IBC, section R907.4 of the IRC, or section 1513.3 of Chapter 15 Appendix to the UBC. VersaShield® Fire-Resistant Roof Deck Protection physical/ performance properties VersaShield® Fire-Resistant Roof Deck Protection Class A rating layer requirements* Tensile MD ASTM D146/D828 60 lb./in. width CMD 30 lb./in. width Tensile MD ASTM D1922 400 grams CMD 550 grams Water vapor transmission Permeance ASTM E96 3 Perms minimum Liquid water transmission test ASTM D4896 Pass Roofing material Roof type Minimum thickness 15/32" plywood Existing wood shake/shingle Spaced sheathing UL Listed Stone Coated Steel Direct to deck shingle 0.013" 1 Layer N/A 1 Layer UL Classified or Listed Steel Direct to deck shingle 0.013"1 Layer + 30 Felt N/A 1 Layer + 30 Felt Any UL Classified or Listed Steel Batten required shingle 0.013" 1 Layer 2 Layers 1 Layer Any UL Classified or Listed Steel Panel of standing seam 0.015" 1 Layer N/A 1 Layer Any UL Classified or Listed Copper Panel of standing seam 0.016" 1 Layer N/A 1 Layer Any UL Classified or Listed Copper Shingle 0.016" 1 Layer + 30 Felt 2 Layers 1 Layer + 30 Felt Any UL Classified or Listed Aluminum Panel or shingle 0.018" 2 Layers N/A N/A Typical applications for combustible decks Roof covering will determine actual assembly Product Details: 2 74 07 72 53 SNOW RETENTION SYSTEMS SNOW BRACKET A FOR NEW CONSTRUCTION AND RETROFIT USED ON: STANDING SEAM METAL DECOGUARD CLAMP-ON MUSHROOM TALL * These dimensions vary based on the panel rib type and height. DESCRIPTION • Designed for standing seam metal roofs • Available for rib types including: Double Lock, Single Lock, Snap Lock, Skyline • Allows for full installation without penetration of the roof surface • Powder coated to match roofing material color • Overall dimensions: 4.68”L X 6.13”W X VAR"H • Height (HT) of clamp varies based on rib type and height • Carriage bolt (2) 3/8” Dia X 1-3/4” or 2” MATERIALS • Zinc Coated Steel: 3/16” (ASTM A36) • Copper: 1/4” (ASTM B152) • A588: 3/16” (ASTM A588) COLORS/FINISHES • Raw Steel • Zinc Plated Steel • Hot-Dipped Galvanized Steel • Mill Finish Copper • Mill Finish A588 • Powder coating available in many colors visit http://trasnowandsun.com/color-chart/ to see color chart NOTE: Due to specific job conditions, TRA Snow and Sun will only warranty a snow retention system/layout that has been designed by TRA Snow and Sun. V A R I E S 4.68 V A R I E S 6.13 V A R I E S V A R I E S 4.68 V A R I E S 6.13 V A R I E S V A R I E S 4.68 V A R I E S 6.13 V A R I E S Revision 04/28/22 4.50 DOUBLE LOCK SINGLE LOCK “L” 1 3/4" ≤ X" SNAP LOCK 1" - 1 1/2" SNAP LOCK INSTALLATION: CLAMP THE SNOW FENCE TO THE RIB BY USING A TORQUE WRENCH WITH 30 FT - LBS. OF PRESSURE APPLIED TO EACH BOLT. FOR SPECIFIC ENGINEER- ING & PLACEMENT CALL TRA SNOW & SUN AT 801- 756-8666. DIMENSIONS DO NOT SCALE ©TRA Snow and Sun, Inc., 2022 1657 South 580 East American Fork, UT 84003 800-606-8980 | www.trasnowandsun.com 75 DATA SHEET FOR MORE INFORMATION Company: Heatizon Systems Toll Free: 888-239-1232 Email: info@heatizon.com Visit us at: www.heatizon.com 4137 South 500 West Murray, Utah 84123 © Heatizon Systems, 2021| Design: 16 AWG MIN, Tinned CopperPolyolefin JacketUV Polyolenfin Outer Jacket Tinned Copper Braid Semi-conductive heating matrix (Polymer) & Polyolefin Adhesive Jacket .51” .26” Other Information: Eaves Gutters Valleys Downspouts Applications: GutterMelt® SR9 Deicing and Heat Trace Cable GutterMelt® SR9-1 and SR9-2 self- regulating roof and gutter de-icing cables are designed to economically and effectively provide heat to maintain water flow paths on eaves, in gutters, downspouts and drains. GutterMelt® SR9 cables produces 9 watts per foot at 32 degrees in snow and ice creating reliable drain paths for water while carrying an industry leading 10yr warranty. SR9-1 GutterMelt® is for use with 120 volt power, and SR9-2 GutterMelt® is for use with 208, 240, 277 volt power. For projects requiring a higher heat output see GutterMelt® SR12 (12 watts/ft) information sheet. GutterMelt® self regulating capability means that as the temperature decreases the heat output increase to more effectively melt at lower temperatures. Conversely as the ambient temperature rises GutterMelt® decreases its heat output saving energy and money. GutterMelt SR9 is a great choice for both Residential and Commercial projects, it can also be used to trace pipes for reliable freeze protection. Description: Bus Wire . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 16 AWG, Tinned Copper Core & Liner . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Semi-conductive heating matrix (Polymer) & Polyolefin Adhesive Jacket Second Jacket . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Polyolefin Jacket Metallic Shield . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Tinned Copper Braid Outer Jacket . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . UV Polyolenfin Over Jacket Minimum Bending Radius . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1” Supply Voltage/s . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 120 or 208-277 Vac Max. Maintenance Temperature . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 185°F (85°C) Max Intermittent Exposure Temperature . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 212°F (100°C) Nominal Power Output at 32° . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 9 watts/foot Warranty . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 10 year limited warranty Listing Agency .................................................... ETL (Intertek Testing Laboratory) Specifications: Power Dividing Factor 208 VAC 277 VAC SR9-2 .92 1.09 Circuit Sizing:15A CB 20A CB 30A CB Model #Operating Voltage Watts/ft in Ice/Snow @ -20° F @ 0° F @ 40° F @ -20° F @ 0° F @ 40° F @ -20° F @ 0° F @ 40° F SR9-1 120 Vac 9 85’95’150’100’125’200’170’190’210’ SR9-2 208-277 Vac 9 170’195’295’225’250’390’340’375’420’ Note: Ground fault protection must be used when installing all GutterMelt® SR products. Re- fer to the NEC or CEC for specific requirements. GutterMelt-SR9 76 DATA SHEET FOR MORE INFORMATION Company: Heatizon Systems Toll Free: 888-239-1232 Email: info@heatizon.com Visit us at: www.heatizon.com Note: Ground fault protection must be used when installing all Self-Regulating Cable products. Refer to the NEC or CEC for specific requirements. 4137 South 500 West Murray, Utah 84123 © Heatizon Systems, 2017 • Use to terminate one powered end of Self- Regulating heating cable into a junction box and to seal off one non-powered end of cable. • Used for a hard-wired connection to supply power. • Includes materials for one (1) power connection assembly. • 1 1’’ X 1/2’’ Dia. Heat Shrink tube • 2 5” x 1/8” Heat Shrink Tube • 1 5” x 1/4 Green Heat Shrink Tube • 1 4” Flex Braid • 1 6” x 3/4 Heat Shrink Tubing • 3 Yellow Wire Nuts • 3 Red Wire Nuts • 1 Cord Connector • 1 HS End Cap For use with Heatizon’s various brands of Self- Regulating cable, creating a primary power connection. Description:Design: Includes: Uses: Self-Regulating Cable Power Connect Kits Heatizon’s Self-Regulating cable brand’s are used for Roof deicing, snow melting, floor warming, and pipe freeze protection. SELF-REGULATING CABLE BRANDS: - GutterMelt: Roof/Gutter Deicing - Hott-Wire: Snow Melting - OutPipe: Pipe Freeze Protection - Cozy Heat: Floor Warming WARNING: ELECTRIC SHOCK HAZARD. Disconnect all electrical power before installing or servicing GutterMelt® cable and/or accessories. A qualified person must perform all installation and service of GutterMelt® and its accessories per GutterMelt® installation instructions, the Canadian electric Code (CEC), the National Electric Code (NEC) and local building codes and requirements. All GutterMelt® installations must be effectively grounded in accordance with the CEC or NEC to eliminate shock hazards and risk to property. Failure to comply the installation instructions in their entirety can result in personal injury and/or property damage. NOTE: All electrical wiring, including GFCI (Ground Fault Circuit Interrupters), must be done according to the CEC or NEC and/or local codes by qualified persons. NOTICE: Caution must be used to make certain that all Power, End and Splice Kits are installed properly and water tight. All Self Regulating Cables are adversely affected by water and will fail if water is allowed to enter its interior. Application: * Does not include junction box. Junction Box Power Connection Kit (HT386505M) 77 www.heatizon.com GUTTERMELT® POWER CONNECTION KIT Installation Instructions: A. Slide the four (4) components of the nylon cable connector onto the GutterMelt® SR Cable in the order shown in the drawing to the right. B. Assemble the 1/2” compression cable connector but do not tighten at this point. Leave at least 7” of cable extending through the connector. C. Score the outer jacket GutterMelt® Insu- lator 6.5” from the end of the cable. Re- move the outer jacket to expose the grounding braid. Do not cut the grounding braid. D. Gently pull the grounding braid apart at a point nearest the remaining outer jacket and pull the cable through the opening in the grounding braid. Twist the grounding braid into a pigtail. E. Carefully cut the insulation 6” down the center between the two conductor wires. Bare the 6” length of each conductor by stripping off the outside insulation and the inner black core. Note: Do not cut the inner conductors. F. Slide the 1” piece of 1/2” heat shrink tub- ing over the conductor wires and position over the inner insulation and the conduc- tor wires. Place the heat shrink tubing up against the braided ground wire and shrink the tubing. While hot, pinch the heat shrink tubing in between the two conductor wires with a pair of pliers and hold for about 10 seconds. Warning: Do not overheat the heat shrink tube or GutterMelt® Cable. Keep the heat source moving at all times. 1 2 3 4 7" 6.5" The GutterMelt® Power Connection Kit is used to connect one end of GutterMelt® Cable to the appropriate power source in a junc- tion box, and to terminate and seal off one non-powered end of GutterMelt® Cable. WARNING: ELECTRIC SHOCK HAZARD. Disconnect all electrical power before installing or servicing GutterMelt® cable and/or accessories. A qualified person must perform all installation and service of GutterMelt® and its accessories per GutterMelt® installa- tion instructions, the Canadian electric Code (CEC), the National Electric Code (NEC) and local building codes and requirements. All GutterMelt® installations must be effectively grounded in accordance with the CEC or NEC to eliminate shock hazards and risk to property. Failure to comply the installation instructions in their entirety can result in personal injury and/or property damage. NOTE: All electrical wiring, including GFCI (Ground Fault Circuit Interrupters), must be done according to the CEC or NEC and/or local codes by qualified persons. NOTICE: Caution must be used to make certain that all Power, End and Splice Kits are installed properly and water tight. All Self- Regulating Cables are adversely affected by water and will fail if water is allowed to enter its interior. 78 www.heatizon.com GUTTERMELT® POWER CONNECTION KIT G. Slide a 5” piece of 1/8” black heat shrink tubing over each of the conductor wires and position next to the heat shrink tubing previ- ously installed. Make sure that 1/2” of the conductor wire is exposed. Slide the 1/4” green heat shrink tubing over the braded ground wires that are twisted together, leav- ing exposed at least 1/2” of the end of the wire. Shrink the heat shrink tubing on all of the wires. H. Tighten the 1/2” compression cable con- nector installed in “B” above 7” from the end of the cable. I. Insert entire assembly into NEMA 4 or 4X Electrical Junction Box. Junction Box should be protected from weather if possi- ble. J. Strip the incoming power conductor leads and ground wire to expose a 1/2” length of bare conductor. Use the appropriate size of wire nut and connect the power conductors and ground wire to the GutterMelt conductor wires and the braided ground wires. K. Carefully push the connected wires into the power termination box and secure the cov- er. Screw the 1/2” compression cable con- nector into the power termination Junction Box to form a water tight seal. L. GutterMelt® SR Cable power leads may be connected to a Heatizon Relay Panel or appropriate activation device (see your Heatizon Systems dealer for alternatives). Warning: Do not overheat the heat shrink tube or GutterMelt® Cable. Keep the heat source moving at all times. Heatizon Systems (801) 293-1232 Kit Contains: 1 1’’ X 1/2’’ Dia. Heat Shrink tube 2 5” x 1/8” Heat Shrink Tube 1 5” x 1/4 Green Heat Shrink Tube 1 6” x 3/4 Heat Shrink Tubing 3 Yellow Wire Nuts 3 Red Wire Nuts 1 4” Flex Braid 1 Cord Connector 1 HS End Cap © 2015 Heatizon Systems 79 1”18” 1/2” 80 81 82 83 REGULAR MEETING HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION JULY 10TH, 2024 Interim Chairperson Moyer opened the regular meeting of the Aspen Historic Preservation Commission at 4:30pm. Commissioners in attendance: Roger Moyer, Jodi Surfas, Kim Raymond, Barb Pitchford, and Charlie Tarver. Absent were Peter Fornell, Riley Warwick, Jeffrey Halferty and Kara Thompson. Staff present: Stuart Hayden, Planner - Historic Preservation Ben Anderson, Community Development Director Kate Johnson, Assistant City Attorney Mike Sear, Deputy City Clerk MINUTES: None PUBLIC COMMENTS: None COMMISSION MEMBER COMMENTS: Ms. Surfas inquired about a large outdoor refrigerator outside the new Wild Fig restaurant. Mr. Hayden noted that while it was in the historic district, this was not a designated historic property. He said that he would look into what was being installed to make sure it complied with what was approved. Ms. Pitchford asked about the Boomerang. She noted that the building is clearly deteriorating. She knew that the City took some action there, but all she can see is that they put up a fence. Mr. Hayden noted that he advocated for taking down the screening on the fence so that people could have eyes on the building. He said that the owners were on track with their repairs. Ms. Johnson noted that the City had taken action against them in Municipal Court to fix the issues. She said that there had been many engineering site visits and there were not a lot of concerns with the structural integrity of the building. She noted that while the owners had applied for a repair permit, she did not believe that the building would look any different aesthetically once the repairs were complete. Ms. Pitchford asked if the building could sit there as is for the next 50 years. Ms. Johnson said that as long as they maintain the structural integrity, yes. She said that there is no obligation by the property owner to occupy or develop it. Then Ms. Pitchford asked about the Crystal Palace building. She noted that it had been made tidy from the outside, but wondered if they could just let it sit. Ms. Johnson noted that they do have a building permit and that work is being done on the interior. Mr. Tarver asked if Historic Preservation staff were staying on top of the Boomerang Lodge. Ms. Johnson said yes. DISCLOSURE OF CONFLICTS OF INTEREST: None PROJECT MONITORING: None STAFF COMMENTS: None CERTIFICATE OF NO NEGATIVE EFFECT: None 84 REGULAR MEETING HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION JULY 10TH, 2024 CALL UP REPORTS: None SUBMIT PUBLIC NOTICE FOR AGENDA ITEMS: Ms. Johnson confirmed that public notice was completed in compliance with the Code as needed for the agenda item. NEW BUSINESS: 117 North Sixth Street - Minor Development - PUBLIC HEARING Applicant Presentation: Mr. Jake Ezratty – Brikor Associates; Monty Earl Mr. Ezratty started by handing out a few materials related to their request. He stated that they are representing the Tolk’s who have some concerns about the historic structure on their historic structure. They believe the roof needs replacing but are concerned with replacing it with the exact same material due to fire hazard and structural issues. They felt it would be better to use a metal material as a replacement as it is lighter and promotes snow to slide off. He noted there was a letter from the engineer in the packet. Mr. Earl noted that a lot of these types of historic roofs in town had survived the snow loads because they were not insulated. He also noted that once the building is insulated the snow will build up, which is why they were proposing a metal roof. He also referenced the increased risk of wildfires and the fire hazard that wooden roofs pose. He noted that metal is a common roofing material throughout town, and he listed some of its sustainability benefits. Ms. Raymond asked when the house was built. Ms. Pitchford said that in staff’s report it notes that it was built in 1885. Mr. Moyer asked if a fully installed metal roof weighs more than a wood shingle roof. The applicants said a metal roof would be lighter. Mr. Moyer asked if the current structure supporting the existing shingled roof in good condition. Mr. Earl said they were not completely sure as the building had not been opened up since a remodel in the 1990s. Ms. Raymond asked what the Class A roof assembly would be for the proposed metal roof. Mr. Earl detailed that assembly. Mr. Ezratty explained that more underlayers were required on a Class A wood shingle roof assembly which would add more weight than what is currently there. Ms. Surfas asked why they were wanting a lighter weight metal roof, as the engineer’s letter presented to them mentioned that there were no obvious structural issues with the house. Mr. Earl said the while there may not be any obvious issues, the engineer was not able to fully inspect the structure as it was not opened up. He also reiterated the snow load concerns. Mr. Tarver asked whether they had looked at using synthetic wood look shingles. Mr. Earl said he was not aware that those were allowed. Staff Presentation: Stuart Hayden – Acting Principal Preservation Planner - Historic Preservation Mr. Hayden started his presentation by describing the structure and its location and noted that he believed the location, form and style of this historic resource make the roof a particularly prominent and defining feature. He showed a few pictures of neighboring structures and noted that there was a variety of shingled roofs in the area. He said that as far as he could tell the structure had always had a wood shingled roof. 85 REGULAR MEETING HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION JULY 10TH, 2024 Mr. Hayden went over the historic design guidelines, pointing out guidelines 7.7, 7.8, 10.3, 10.4 and 10.6 as described in the staff findings portion of the agenda packet. He detailed why staff found these guidelines to be not met as spelled out in the agenda materials. As a result, Mr. Hayden said that staff’s recommendation is denial of this application. Mr. Tarver asked Mr. Hayden if the existing shingled roof on the non-historic structure was to stay the same, would his opinion stay the same regarding changing from wood to metal on the historic structure. Mr. Hayden said no, as there are elements of the non-historic structure that use metal roof materials and that the intent of guidelines 7.7 and 7.8 is to maintain the historic character of the historic resource. Ms. Raymond asked Mr. Hayen if he could speak to the fire protection aspects. Mr. Hayden noted that fire protection issues were not addressed in the applicant’s proposal and that some flexibility had been created in the guidelines to take fire protection into account, allowing for the use of alternative materials. Mr. Earl noted that the metal roof on the breezeway of the non-historic structure was a galvanized zinc and silver in color. They believed that the proposed black standing seam metal for the historic resource would be considered the separation of materials. Mr. Ezratty mentioned that their main concern is the longevity of the structure as a whole. He reiterated their concerns with adding more weight with a Class A shingled roof assembly. Public Comment: None Board Discussion: Ms. Raymond started the discussion by recognizing the fire issues and noted the recent discussions by HPC regarding alternate shingle materials that could be used. She thought that this particular building may not be the best application for a metal roof and referenced the other composite materials out there that look more like wood shingles and would better meet the guidelines. She said that the perceived structural issues did not hold a lot of weight in her mind as the building has stood for over 100 years and we do not get as much snow as we used to. She understood the need to preserve the building from fire. Ms. Surfas thought the applicant was conflating two issues…the fire issues and the structural integrity. She wondered which was the real concern. From what she could tell, there was no reason for a lighter weight roof other than the applicant thinking it was needed. Ms. Pitchford agreed with Ms. Raymond and said that her main concern was related to guideline 7.7 to maintain the historic character of the historic roof. She thought putting a metal roof on the structure would change the character. Mr. Tarver asked Mr. Hayden to clarify that a historic structure that originally had a metal roof can replace it with metal and a historic structure without a metal roof originally can’t. Ms. Johnson noted that “can’t” is too strong of a word because they were dealing with guidelines and not rules. She said that it is about evaluating the historical character of structure and the likeness of materials that are being proposed. She noted that there is no historical context that there was a metal roof. Mr. Tarver also noted that there were non-metal roofing materials that were fire retardant available. Mr. Moyer said that he agreed with staff primarily on guideline 7.7. Ms. Johnson noted that a denial from HPC would mean the applicant would not be able to reapply with a substantially similar proposal for one year. She said that what HPC has suggested in the past is for the 86 REGULAR MEETING HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION JULY 10TH, 2024 applicant to either withdraw the application or request a continuance to reevaluate their proposal in order to avoid a denial. She said that it was ultimately up to the applicant. Mr. Ezratty asked about the recent changes to the guidelines regarding flexibility in materials. Ms. Johnson explained that it allowed for metal roofing to be a possibility but did not change how HPC was supposed to evaluate metal roof proposals. She further explained the applicant’s options here. Mr. Earl asked what the process would be if they proposed replacing the roof with the exact same materials as exist now. Ms. Johnson said that it would not have to come before HPC in that situation. There was some continued discussion of the applicant’s options for withdrawal or continuance. MOTION: Ms. Raymond moved to continue this hearing to September 11th, 2024 at 4:30pm. Mr. Moyer seconded. Roll call vote: Mr. Moyer, yes; Ms. Surfas, yes; Ms. Pitchford, yes; Ms. Raymond, yes; Mr. Tarver, yes. 5-0 vote, motion passes. ADJOURN: Ms. Pitchford motioned to adjourn the regular meeting. Ms. Surfas seconded. All in favor; motion passes. Mike Sear, Deputy City Clerk 87 Page 1 of 5 427 Rio Grande Pl., Aspen, CO 81611-1975 | P: 970.920.5197 | cityofaspen.com Memorandum TO: Aspen Historic Preservation Commission THRU: Ben Anderson, Community Development Director FROM: Jeffrey Barnhill, AICP, Senior Planner MEETING DATE: Wednesday, September 11, 2024 RE: 128 East Main Street – Sardy House – HP Minor Development, Setback Variation PUBLIC HEARING APPLICANT /OWNER: BTRSardy LLC, PO Box 61239, Palo Alto, CA 94306 REPRESENTATIVE: Garrett Larimer, Kraemer Land Planning, PO Box 3275, Basalt, CO 81621 LOCATION: Street Address: 128 E Main Street, Sardy House Parcel Identification Number: PID# 2735-124-38-005 CURRENT ZONING Mixed Use (MU) Main Street Historic District SUMMARY: 128 East Main Street, Sardy House, is an AspenVictorian designated property containing a residence and a multi-room boardinghouse. The applicant requests approval for a Minor Development and a Setback Variation to replace the existing mechanical equipment in the rear setback. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff supports the application and recommends approval of the proposed upgraded mechanical equipment. BACKGROUND: 128 E. Main Street, commonly known as the Sardy House, was built in 1891. The property is a local landmark and sited within the Main Street Historic District. Figure 1: Site Locator Map 88 Page 2 of 5 427 Rio Grande Pl., Aspen, CO 81611-1975 | P: 970.920.5197 | cityofaspen.com 128 East Main is one of only four brick Victorian era mansions remaining in Aspen (the others being Aspen Historical Society, 201 W. Francis and St. Mary’s Rectory.) J.W. Atkinson, part owner of the Little Annie mine, built the home using bricks from his father’s brickyard, which was established in 1888 and located on North Mill Street. The Sardy family owned the home from 1945 to 1985. Tom and Alice Rachel Sardy built a legacy in Aspen as operators of Aspen Lumber Supply and Mortuary, and by serving as e lected officials and volunteers. Aspen’s airport, Sardy field, was named in honor of Tom Sardy’s effort to improve air service to Aspen. Like other downtown structures, the use of this building has varied in its history. In the mid 80s, Frank Peters and Daniel Delano bought the property from the Sardy’s and created a hotel, including the construction of an addition at the rear of the site. Today, the northernmost part of the structure, separated from the rest of the building by an upper level bridge, is considered to be a boarding house, offered for overnight lodging, and the remainder of the property is a single family house. The property has a history of land use reviews and approvals. Most notably, the existing location of the mechanical equipment on the property was reviewed and approved in 2003. The Historic Preservation Commission found that the mechanical equipment would be b est located at the rear of the property. The mechanical equipment would not affect the historic buildings or uses on the site, and there was minimal visual impact on the property by siting the mechanical equipment in the rear yard setback. According to the applicant, the existing mechanical equipment has not functioned for the last two and a half years. An engineering letter provided by the applicant explains that there are no replacement parts available for the unit due to the age of the ex isting equipment. The applicant proposes to install new mechanical equipment that will be more energy efficient, quieter for neighbors, and still maintain that minimal visual impact on the property. REQUEST OF HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION (HPC) The Applicant requests the following approvals from HPC. • Minor Development (26.415.070.C) for the increased dimensions of the new mechanical equipment and the replacement within the setback. • Historic Preservation Benefits – Variations (Section 26.415.110.C) for the location of the mechanical equipment in the rear yard setback. PROJECT SUMMARY: The applicant proposes replacing the existing mechanical equipment on site and installing larger mechanical equipment in the same location. The new mechanical equipment is a major improvement to the existing equipment. The existing equipment does not meet the City of Aspen Noise Regulations at the lot line. The proposed equipment will meet the Noise Regulations at all hours of the day. The proposed equipment also offers increased energy efficiency with upgraded equipment and the addition of a buffer tank. The new equipment does increase the height of the mechanical equipment from 5’ 5” to 8’ 7” (Figure 4). However, staff feels that this increase in height is insignificant related to the benefits from the new equipment and low visual impact. 89 Page 3 of 5 427 Rio Grande Pl., Aspen, CO 81611-1975 | P: 970.920.5197 | cityofaspen.com Figure 2: Existing Mechanical Equipment Figure 3: Proposed Mechanical Equipment Figure 4: Dimensions and Decibels STAFF COMMENTS: The applicant proposes to replace the existing mechanical equipment in the rear yard setback with new mechanical equipment. The mechanical equipment will be slightly larger in size and occupy more space in the setback. Most of the equipment will be within 7” of the property line; Figure 3. Existing Unit Configuration Figure 4. Proposed Unit Configuration 90 Page 4 of 5 427 Rio Grande Pl., Aspen, CO 81611-1975 | P: 970.920.5197 | cityofaspen.com however, the mechanical equipment will meet all City of Aspen Noise Ordinance limits. The design also provides minimal visual impact on the property. It is important to note that a setback variation was granted by the HPC in 2003. The findings during that development proposal found that the location was the best-case location to provide minimal impact to the historic resource. The property is constrained in locations where mechanical equipment may be located (Figure 5). Equipment relocation to any other area on the site would likely cause significant financial and logistical challenges to the applicant. Siting the mechanical equipment behind the non-historic addition creates less impacts on the historic resource on site. The proposal creates more efficient and quieter mechanical equipment, limits construction impacts, and maintains the limited visibility as viewed from the right-of-way. The proposed mechanical equipment in the rear yard setback also ensures that the mechanical equipment is not located between a street and a structure which is not allowed pursuant to Section 26.575.020.E.5.N. Figure 5: Mechanical Equipment Locations 91 Page 5 of 5 427 Rio Grande Pl., Aspen, CO 81611-1975 | P: 970.920.5197 | cityofaspen.com The proposed mechanical equipment will not be located between any lot line adjacent to a street and any structure. The mechanical equipment shall be located at least double the minimum setback for a primary structure from any lot line adjacent to a street. The Mixed-Use zone district requires a side yard setback of five feet, the proposed equipment is much greater than ten feet away from the street facing side yard setback. The mechanical equipment appears to be slightly visible from the street; however, vegetation screens the mechanical equipment sufficiently. The mechanical equipment is located within the setback not adjacent to a street and exceeds the thirty inches above and forty-eight inches below finished grade. Staff finds that the proposed project meets all applicable land use review criteria and requirements or will with the approval of a setback variation. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the HPC adopt the attached resolution approving the request for Minor Development and a setback variation to replace the existing mechanical equipment in the rear setback with new mechanical equipment. HPC may approve, approve with conditions, or deny – based on the review criteria presented. ATTACHMENTS: Resolution #____, Series of 2024 Exhibit A – Staff Findings Exhibit B – Application 92 HPC Resolution #___, Series of 2024 Page 1 of 3 RESOLUTION #___ (SERIES OF 2024) A RESOLUTION OF THE ASPEN HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION (HPC) APPROVING A MINOR DEVELOPMENT AND SETBACK VARIATION FOR THE PROPERTY COMMONLY KNOWN AS: 128 EAST MAIN STREET, SARDY HOUSE; LEGALLY KNOWN AS: LOTS F, G, G, AND I LESS THE NORTHERLY 75 FEET THEREOF, AND ALL OF LOTS P, Q, R, AND S AND THAT PART OF THE VACATED ALLEY BOUNDED BY THE EXTENSION OF THE EASTERLY LOT LINES OF LOTS I AND S AND THE WESTERLY LOT LINES OF LOTS F AND P, ALL IN BLOCK 66, CITY AND TOWNSITE OF ASPEN, COUNTY OF PITKIN, STATE OF COLORADO. Parcel ID: 2735-124-38-005 WHEREAS, the applicant, BTRSardy, LLC, PO Box 61239, Palo Alto, CA 94306, represented by Garrett Larimer, Kraemer Land Planning, PO Box 3275, Basalt, CO 8162 1, has requested HPC approval for a Minor Development and Setback Variation for the property located at 128 East Main Street, Sardy House, City of Aspen, Pitkin County, Colorado; and WHEREAS, Community Development Department staff reviewed the application for compliance with applicable review standards and recommends approval; and, WHEREAS, on September 11, 2024 during a duly noticed public hearing, the City of Aspen Historic Preservation Commission considered the development proposal under the applicable provisions of the Municipal Code as identified herein, reviewed, and considered the recommendation of the Community Development Director and took and considered public comment; and, WHEREAS, the City of Aspen Historic Preservation Commission finds that the development proposal meets the applicable review criteria, and that approval of the request is consistent with the goals and objectives of the Land Use Code; and, WHEREAS, The City of Aspen Historic Preservation Commission approves Resolution #__, Series of 2024, by a xx to xx (x – x) vote, approving the request for minor development and a setback variation. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED: THAT CITY OF ASPEN HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION HEREBY APPROVES THE MINOR DEVELOPMENT AND SETBACK VARIATION FOR THE REPLACEMENT OF THE MECHANICAL EQUIPMENT IN THE REAR YARD SETBACK. Section 1: Approvals Pursuant to the procedures and standards set forth in Title 26 of the Aspen Municipal Code, the Board of Adjustment hereby grants the following dimensional variances, as displayed in Exhibit A, approved equipment location: 93 HPC Resolution #___, Series of 2024 Page 2 of 3 128 East Main Street – Sardy House • Rear Yard Setback: Seven inches (7”) for the construction of a roughly 103” tall x 261” wide (8 ft. 7 in. x 21 ft. 9 in.) HVAC system. No other development other than grading as represented shall be permitted within established Mixed-Use setbacks other than those projections defined within Land Use Code Subsection 26.575.020.E.5, Allowed Projections into Setbacks. Section 2: Vested Rights The development approvals granted herein shall constitute a vested property right attaching to and running with the lot for a period of three (3) years from the date of issuance of a development order. However, any failure to abide by any of the terms and conditions attendant to this approval shall result in the forfeiture of said vested property right. Section 3: Material Representations All material representations and commitments made by the Applicant pursuant to the development proposal approvals as herein awarded, whether in public hearing or documentation presented before the Community Development Department, the Historic Preservation Commission, or the Aspen City Council are hereby incorporated in such plan development approvals and the same shall be complied with as if fully set forth herein, unless amended by other specific conditions or an authorized authority. Section 4: Existing Litigation This Resolution shall not affect any existing litigation and shall not operate as an abatement of any action or proceeding now pending under or by virtue of the ordinances repealed or amended as herein provided, and the same shall be conducted and concluded under such prior ordinances. Section 5: Severability If any section, subsection, sentence, clause, phrase, or portion of this Resolution is for any reason held invalid or unconstitutional in a court of competent jurisdiction, such portion shall be deemed a separate, distinct and independent provision and shall not affect the validity of the remaining portions thereof. APPROVED BY THE COMMISSION at its regular meeting on the 11th day of September, 2024. Approved as to Form: Approved as to Content: ________________________________ ________________________________ Katharine Johnson, Assistant City Attorney Kara Thompson, Chair ATTEST: ______________________________ Mike Sear, Deputy City Clerk 94 HPC Resolution #___, Series of 2024 Page 3 of 3 Exhibit A: Approved Equipment Location 95 Exhibit**** Review Criteria Staff Findings 128 E Main Street – Sardy House Historic Preservation Commission Page 1 of 4 Historic Preservation Benefits – Variations - Section 26.415.110.C (c) Variations. Dimensional variations are allowed for projects involving designated properties to create development that is more consistent with the character of the historic property or district than what would be required by the underlying zoning’s dimensional standards. (1) The HPC may grant variations of the Land Use Code for designated properties to allow: a. Development in the side, rear and front setbacks; b. Development that does not meet the minimum distance requirements between buildings; c. Up to five percent (5%) additional site coverage; d. Less public amenity than required for the on-site relocation of commercial historic properties. Staff Response: The applicant proposes to replace the existing mechanical equipment in the rear yard setback with new mechanical equipment. The mechanical equipment will be slightly larger in size and occupy more space in the setback. A majority of the equipment will be within 7” of the property line; however, the mechanical equipment will meet all City of Aspen Noise Ordinance limits. The design also provides minimal visual impact on the property. Staff finds this criterion to be met. (2) In granting a variation, the HPC must make a finding that such a variation: a. Is similar to the pattern, features and character of the historic property or district; and/or Enhances or mitigates an adverse impact to the historic significance or architectural character of the historic property, an adjoining designated historic property or historic district. Staff Response: It is important to note that a setback variation was granted by the HPC in 2003. The findings during that development proposal found that the location was the best case location to provide minimal impact to the historic resource. The property is constrained in locations where mechanical equipment may be located (figure 1). Equipment relocation to any other area on the site would likely cause significant financial and logistical challenges to the applicant. Siting the mechanical equipment behind the non-historic addition creates less impacts on the historic resource on site. The proposal creates more efficient and quieter mechanical equipment, limits construction impacts, and maintains the limited visibility as viewed from the right-of-way. The proposed mechanical equipment in the rear yard setback also ensures that the mechanical equipment is not located between a street and a structure which is not allowed pursuant to Section 26.575.020.E.5.N. Staff finds this criterion to be met. 96 Exhibit**** Review Criteria Staff Findings 128 E Main Street – Sardy House Historic Preservation Commission Page 2 of 4 Figure 1: Mechanical Equipment Locations Historic Preservation Design Guidelines 1.10 Built-in furnishings, such as water features, fire pits, grills, and hot tubs, that could interfere with or block views of historic structures are inappropriate. • Site furnishings that are added to the historic property should not be intrusive or degrade the integrity of the neighborhood patterns, site, or existing historic landscape. • Consolidating and screening these elements is preferred. Staff Response: The proposed mechanical equipment does not block views of the historic structures. The mechanical equipment is located in the rear yard setback adjacent to a non - historic addition on the property. The equipment will be shielded by vegetation and landscaping. Staff finds this Guideline to be met. 97 Exhibit**** Review Criteria Staff Findings 128 E Main Street – Sardy House Historic Preservation Commission Page 3 of 4 12.4 Minimize the visual impacts of utilitarian areas, such as mechanical equipment and trash storage. • Place mechanical equipment on the ground where it can be screened. • Mechanical equipment may only be mounted on a building on an alley façade. • Rooftop mechanical equipment or vents must be grouped together to minimize their visual impact. Where rooftop units are visible, it may be appropriate to provide screening with materials that are compatible with those of the building itself. Use the smallest, low profile units available for the purpose. • Window air conditioning units are not allowed. • Minimize the visual impacts of utility connections and service boxes. Group them in a discrete location. Use pedestals when possible, rather than mounting on a historic building. • Paint mechanical equipment in a neutral color to minimize their appearance by blending with their backgrounds • In general, mechanical equipment should be vented through the roof, rather than a wall, in a manner that has the least visual impact possible. • Avoid surface mounted conduit on historic structures. Staff Response: The proposed mechanical equipment location minimizes the visual impacts of the mechanical equipment. The location provides a best-case scenario for exterior mechanical equipment location. It is located between the non-historic addition on site and a telecommunications building. Staff finds this Guideline to be met. Calculations and Measurements Section 26.575.020.(e).(5).n n. Heating and air conditioning equipment and similar mechanical equipment, but excluding generators, shall have the following requirements: 1.Prohibited between any lot line adjacent to a street and any structure; and 2.Shall be located at least double the minimum setback for a primary structure from any lot line adjacent to a street; and 3.If visible from the street, these features shall be screened in accordance with Section 26.575.050, Fence Materials, with natural features, or by other means determined appropriate by the Community Development Director; and 4.If located within a setback not adjacent to a street, these features shall not exceed thirty (30) inches above and forty-eight (48)inches below finished grade. These features may be up to thirty (30) inches above and forty-eight (48) inches below finished grade simultaneously. Staff Response: The proposed mechanical equipment will not be located between any lot line adjacent to a street and any structure. The mechanical equipment shall be located at least double the minimum setback for a primary structure from any lot line adjacent to a street. The Mixed 98 Exhibit**** Review Criteria Staff Findings 128 E Main Street – Sardy House Historic Preservation Commission Page 4 of 4 Use zone district requires a rear yard setback of five feet, the proposed equipment is much greater than ten feet. The mechanical equipment may be visible from the street; however, vegetation screens the mechanical equipment sufficiently. The mechanical equipment is located within the setback not adjacent to a street and exceeds the thirty inches above and forty-eight inches below finished grade. That necessitates the request for a setback variation from the applicant. Staff finds these criteria to be met. 99 Page | 1. Kraemer Land Planning 200 Basalt Center Circle Ste 1 Basalt, Colorado 81621 BTRSardy LLC : Historic Preservation Minor Development & Setback Variation 128 E. Main St. May 7th, 2024 100 Page | 2. Kraemer Land Planning 200 Basalt Center Circle Ste 1 Basalt, Colorado 81621 May 7th, 2024 Bob Narracci Planning Director City of Aspen Community Development 427 Rio Grande Place Aspen, CO 81611 Dear Bob, BTRSardy LLC is the owner of property located at 128 E. Main St. – the Sardy House and is represented by Kraemer Land Planning and Brewster McLeod Architects in this land use matter. BTRSardy LLC (hereafter “Applicant”) requests Historic Preservation Minor Development and a Setback Variation to upgrade and replace existing mechanical equipment in the rear yard setback. The property received Minor Development and a Setback Variation approval in 2003 for the current location of the existing equipment. The proposed equipment with this request is an upgrade that is more efficient and complies with the City noise ordinance. In an effort to improve energy efficiency, comply with City noise requirements, and reduce construction impacts to the historic resource, the proposed equipment is taller than allowed by the code. As a result, the Applicant requests a setback variation to allow for the mechanical equipment to exceed the height limitation for Heating Ventilation Air Conditioning (HVAC) equipment within a setback. Due to the Historic Designation of the property, Minor Development approval is requested. A pre-application conference summary was provided on September 1st, 2023 indicating the land use review processes for this request. All work included in this request is in support of the mechanical equipment upgrade and replacement. The following land use application details the request and is broken up into Sections: I. Exhibits II. Background and Existing Conditions III. Land Use and Permit History IV. Proposal V. Land Use Compliance and Review Standards VI. Summary 101 Page | 3. Kraemer Land Planning 200 Basalt Center Circle Ste 1 Basalt, Colorado 81621 Section I: Exhibits: The following exhibits are provided for a complete application and relate to Section II through Section V. All exhibits are referenced throughout the body of this application: A. Land Use Application B. HOA Compliance Form C. Agreement To Pay Form D. Letter of Authorization E. Proof of Ownership – Title Commitment - Q62016950 (02.14.24) F. Statement of Authority – BTRSardy LLC G. Pre-application Conference Summary H. Vicinity Map I. Previous Land Use History 1. Ordinance No. 2, Series of 1961 – Alley Vacation and Utility Easement 2. Ordinance No. 60, Series of 1976 – Main St. Historic District Designation 3. Ordinance No. 4, Series of 1985 – Sardy House Historic Landmark Designation 4. Board of Adjustment Height and Setback Variance – Case #85-17 5. HPC Resolution No. 5, Series of 2003 – Minor Development Approval for existing HVAC 6. Notice of Approval – Use Classification (2017) 7. HPC Resolution No. 22, Series of 2017 – Minor Development Approval 8. Administrative Determination – Fire Pit Relocation (2019) J. Survey (02.15.24) K. Mechanical Engineering Analysis and Proposed Plans (02.28.24) L. Public Notice Mailing List 102 Page | 4. Kraemer Land Planning 200 Basalt Center Circle Ste 1 Basalt, Colorado 81621 Section II Background and Existing Conditions: The subject site is located on the northwest corner of Main St. and Aspen St. across from Paepcke Park. The property is comprised of Aspen Townsite lots P thru S, a vacated alley, and a portion of Townsite lots F thru I. Aspen Street boarders the property to the east and Main Street bounds the property to the south. The Quest telecommunications building borders the property to the north and the former historic Aspen Library borders the property to the west. According to the survey, the property is approximately 17,444 sq. ft. in size and is located in the Mixed Use (MU) Zone District, the Main Street Historic District, and is a Historically Designated Landmark property. The Sardy House was originally built in 1890 and was used as a residence and, at times, a funeral home. The property was originally developed with a primary residence and a carriage house. In 1985, a two-story multi-room addition north (rear) of the historic residence was approved for construction and used as a boardinghouse, a type of lodging accommodation provided in the Land Use Code at that time. A bridge on the second level creates a connection from the historic resource to the boardinghouse addition. The lower level of the addition contains covered parking spaces, stairs to the upper level, a spa, and living area for one of the units. The upper level contains 10-12 boardinghouse rooms. The primary historic residence continues to function as a residence. Figure 1: Front Façade of the Sardy House (viewed from Main St.) 103 Page | 5. Kraemer Land Planning 200 Basalt Center Circle Ste 1 Basalt, Colorado 81621 Property Zoning: Mixed Use (MU) within a Historic District and with a Historic Designation Overlay Table 1: MU Zoning Requirements Minimum Gross Lot Area: 3,000 sq. ft. Lot Size (per survey): 17,444 sq. ft. Minimum Net Lot Area Per Dwelling Unit (Historic Landmark) 3,000 sq. ft. Maximum Allowable Floor Area Ratio (Total for all Uses): 1:1 Maximum Allowable Floor Area (Free Market Residential) Limited to existing Proposed Floor Area: No Change Minimum Lot Width: 30’ Front Yard Setback: 10’ Minimum Side Yard Setback: 5’ Rear Yard Setback: 5’ Height Limit (detached residential and duplex): 25’ Height Limit (all other uses) 28’ 104 Page | 6. Kraemer Land Planning 200 Basalt Center Circle Ste 1 Basalt, Colorado 81621 Section III Previous Land Use History: Alley Vacation, 1961 In 1961 the City of Aspen Townsite Alley for Block 66 was entirely vacated and an Easement for Public Utilities was established in its place. This vacation enabled the lot configuration know for the property today which includes Lots P-S along Main St., a reconfigured alley, and southern portions of Lots F-I. Main Street Historic District, 1976 City Council approved Ordinance No. 60, Series of 1976 adopting the “Main Street Historic District” (highlighted in yellow, Figure 3) which extends from Monarch to N. Seventh St. and includes Paepcke Park. The Planning and Zoning and Historic Preservation Commissions provided a positive recommendation to City Council who in turn adopted the Historic District zoning overlay enabling the Historic Preservation Commission to review all development activity for compatibility with the historic character of the district. The subject property is part of the Main Street Historic District. Historic Landmark Designation, 1985 In 1980 the Historic Preservation Commission and City Council conducted an Inventory of Historic Sites and Structures. The Sardy House was understandably identified as a structure worthy of Historic Designation due to its Victorian period architecture and condition. The owners of the property voluntarily applied to designate the property and Council approved Ordinance No. 4, Series of 1985 designating the Sardy House as a Historic Resource. This action also created an Historic Preservation Zoning Overlay to the property. Figure 2: Portion of Vacated Alley on Subject Site Highlighted in Yellow Figure 3: Historic Districts in Aspen Subject Site 105 Page | 7. Kraemer Land Planning 200 Basalt Center Circle Ste 1 Basalt, Colorado 81621 Change in Use and Redevelopment, 1985 In 1985, a Change in Use and redevelopment proposal was considered and approved by the Planning and Zoning Commission, Historic Preservation Commission, Board of Adjustment and City Council. Documentation from these approvals is scarce, but a portion of the Sardy House was approved to be converted to a “Boarding House” with a remainder to continue to be used as a residence. Redevelopment of the property was approved, enabling removal of non-historic additions, a renovation of the historic residence and historic carriage house, and addition to the property. The new additions included: • a new structure between the historic residence and historic carriage house, • The bridge between the primary residence and a new addition at the rear of the structure, and • The rear two story portion in the north portion of the property that exists today. The site plan for the 1985 redevelopment approval is included as Figure 4. Board of Adjustment Variance, 1985 In 1985, the Historic Preservation Commission approved a renovation of the Sardy House, discussed above, that required a height variance for a proposed new addition and a setback variance for the pool. The HPC approved a resolution recommending the Board of Adjustment (BOA) approve a height and setback variances to enable a complementary roof to the architectural character of the historic resource and the setback variance for a pool west of the structure. At the time (1985) , the property was located in the Office “O” zone district and the west property boundary setback requirement was 15’. The BOA approved a 10’ Figure 4: 1985 Redevelopment Site Plan 106 Page | 8. Kraemer Land Planning 200 Basalt Center Circle Ste 1 Basalt, Colorado 81621 setback variance, resulting in a minimum 5’ setback along the west property line. Current zoning for the property is Mixed Use and the required side and rear yards setbacks are 5’consistent with the variance grated. HPC Minor Development & Setback Variance – 2003 In 2003, a proposal was submitted to add HVAC equipment north of the Sardy House in the rear yard setback. Minutes from the meeting indicate the HPC supported the application with the following notable considerations: 1. It was determined that placement of the HVAC unit between the “non-historic part of the Sardy House” and the Quest Telecommunications building was a best-case location; 2. The proposed HVAC unit had minimal visibility from the street; 3. Any visibility had a minimal impact on the historic resource; and, 4. The request met the criteria for Minor Development and a Setback Variance. The Historic Preservation Commission unanimously approved the location and size of the equipment. This unit was installed after approval and still exists today. Also in 2003, a Change in Use approval was also granted to convert a portion of the property back to residential use, however, City approvals were not fully executed resulting in a lack of clarity on the building’s use and configuration. Administrative Notice of Approval – Change of Use / Use Clarification, 2017 To clarify the Change in Use approval from 2003, an Administrative Notice of Approval was issued to memorialize the extent of residential and “boardinghouse” uses within the structure. The rear addition, comprised of 10 rooms, was clarified as a boardinghouse use with the remaining balance of the property identified as residential. HPC Minor Development, 2017 The Historic Preservation Commission approved Resolution No. 22, Series of 2017 granting approval for an exterior remodel that included window and door upgrades. Administrative Determination – Fire Pit, 2019 The Community Development Director issued a determination for a relocated fire pit west of its previous location. The fire pit exists today in its approved location near the pool, west of the historic resource. 107 Page | 9. Kraemer Land Planning 200 Basalt Center Circle Ste 1 Basalt, Colorado 81621 Section IV Proposal: The Applicant requests Minor Development approval and an HP Setback Variation to replace mechanical equipment in the rear yard setback. The existing equipment has not worked for two and half years, and the engineering letter (Exhibit K) explains that replacement parts are not available due to the age of the existing equipment. The new equipment will be installed in the same location as the previous unit from the 2003 Minor Development approval (Exhibit I.4). The new unit will be placed on a new concrete pad with the same footprint as the pad that exists today, which measures approximately 5’x15’. A secondary 3’x6’ concrete pad will be added to the west of the replacement chiller pad to accommodate a buffer tank, which improves energy efficiency and extends the usable life of the primary HVAC unit. Existing Unit Proposed Unit Buffer Tank Height 65” 103” * 32” *** Width 43” 32” 24” Length (Total) 143” (single unit) 195” ** 60” (on 36” x 60” pad) Decibels 83-87 60 dB (daytime) & 54 (night) N/A * The chiller units are 67” tall, but the total height of the proposed equipment, inclusive of the concrete pad, 8” stand, and snow/wind/hail guard, totals 103” above grade. ** The 195” total length includes two 71” wide chiller units, a 16” clearance between units, and two ~19” ice/hail/snow guards on the outside edge of each unit (one on west side of Unit #1, one of east side of Unit #2). *** The buffer tank is 28” tall, but is placed on a 4” concrete pad. No guards are needed for the buffer tank. The total dimensions for all proposed equipment as measured by the land use code is: 103” tall x 261” wide (inclusive of all clearances between units and all accessory equipment). Buffer Tank Unit #1 Unit #2 Figure 5: Proposed HVAC Plan View 108 Page | 10. Kraemer Land Planning 200 Basalt Center Circle Ste 1 Basalt, Colorado 81621 Snow Stops to be installed Figure 6: Proposed north elevation (rear of property) Figure 7: Proposed Site Plan Proposed Mechanical Equipment Historic Residence (Outlined in Red) Non-Historic Additions (Outlined in Blue) Historic Carriage House (Outlined in Red) 109 Page | 11. Kraemer Land Planning 200 Basalt Center Circle Ste 1 Basalt, Colorado 81621 Engineering and design firm BG Building Works, has determined the HVAC unit is the minimum size necessary, has increased energy efficiency, and is compliant with the City Noise Ordinance. Brewster Mcleod Architects, the architect on the project has worked with City staff to ensure the replacement unit meets applicable Code requirements. These requirements include: Historic Residence (Outlined in Red) Historic Carriage House (Outlined in Red) Non-Historic Additions (Outlined in Blue) Proposed Mechanical Equipment Figure 8: Aerial Image of Site 110 Page | 12. Kraemer Land Planning 200 Basalt Center Circle Ste 1 Basalt, Colorado 81621 • Mechanical equipment is permitted in a setback if the unit is no more than 30” above grade, and/or 48” below grade; • Mechanical equipment cannot be placed between a structure and a street; • A double setback applies to any equipment in a street facing yard; • All development activity must comply with Historic Design Guidelines; • COA Noise Limitations – 60 dB during the day and 55 dB at night. (measured at property lines) One of the primary benefits of replacing the old, inefficient equipment is the new unit is more energy efficient and quieter. As technology advances and equipment becomes more efficient, unfortunately HVAC units become larger. The Applicant has provided an engineering letter describing the technical changes to the equipment that cause the larger unit sizes (Exhibit K). Early discussions with City staff encouraged in-kind replacement of the existing equipment, with a unit that was the same size or smaller. After extensive research, no units that were found that adequately heat and cool the structure, comply with the noise ordinance, and were the same size of smaller than the existing unit. The Applicant is aware that it is critical to ensure the new unit meets the City Noise Ordinance. Based on specifications provided by the mechanical engineer, the proposed unit will operate at 60 dB during the day, and 54 dB at night. Also of critical importance, the equipment has been sited to ensure it has a minimal visual impact. The unit is located behind the non-historic portion of the Sardy House. It is not visible from Main Street, and has very limited visibility from the sidewalk along Aspen St. When standing on the Aspen St. sidewalk looking west, down the rear property line, both properties have mechanical equipment located throughout this area (see Figure 9 & 10 below). The proposed equipment will not result in increased negative visual impacts to the resource or property. The property is bordered on the north by a Quest telecommunication building which includes significant communication and mechanical equipment on the exterior of the structure. This area between the properties serves as a mechanical corridor between parking on the subject site and Quest. The Quest building has limited occupancy and use, and does not include any windows on the south façade facing the Sardy House. It was also important that the proposed equipment had a minimal construction impact on the historic portions of the property and surrounding neighbors. Other locations on site were evaluated to see if there was an alternative location that satisfied these considerations and complied with applicable codes, see Figure 11 below. 111 Page | 13. Kraemer Land Planning 200 Basalt Center Circle Ste 1 Basalt, Colorado 81621 Figure 9: View along rear property line from S. Aspen St. Figure 10: View along rear property line from S. Aspen St. Figure 11: Equipment Placement Site Analysis 112 Page | 14. Kraemer Land Planning 200 Basalt Center Circle Ste 1 Basalt, Colorado 81621 It was important to use the existing infrastructure to support the new unit. If a new location for the chiller was proposed, it would require an extensive interior remodel to re-route mechanical venting throughout the structure. It would also require trenching new electrical services lines, removing vegetation and plantings, excavating and pouring a new concrete pad, and other site disturbance that would likely require additional exterior renovations and may impact the historic resource. After full consideration of all impacts and possible alternatives, replacement of the existing equipment in the same location was determined to be the best solution. The new equipment is located directly behind an enclosed stair, which allows venting to route directly into interior space and eliminates venting through other exterior locations. If the equipment were relocated east or west of the current location, it would still be within the rear setback, and would require routing venting through open air covered parking, reducing system efficiency. The manufacturer’s recommendations and HVAC best design practices result in the proposed unit configuration. In order to ensure longevity of the units, the manufacture and engineer recommend snow/wind/hail guards are installed on top of the mechanical equipment – which are ~28” in height at their highest point. Roof snow stops are also recommended on the non- historic boarding house addition above the proposed equipment to safeguard the new units from snow and ice damage. Placing the units in a subgrade pit, as encouraged by the land use code, is not a feasible option for this property due the site constraints. If a pit were used, the clearances required around the unit to allow for adequate air circulation and maintenance clearances would require a larger pad/footprint, likely resulting in a property line encroachment. Insufficient air circulation is not recommended and reduces the efficiency of the unit. Reduced efficiency results in increased noise and impacts of the equipment as it is required to work harder and cycle more frequently to achieve the desired heating and cooling. The increased demand on the system results in the need to replace the unit more frequently. The negative impacts are so significant, that when equipment is placed in a pit, the manufacture will not provide a warranty. Historic Preservation – Design Guidelines The Historic Preservation Design Guidelines seek to ensure mechanical equipment avoids negative impact on the historic resource and has limited visibility from the street. The location of the proposed equipment is consistent with previously approved HVAC equipment, which was unanimously approved and determined to be the least impactful and best location for equipment. The Sardy House is a prominent historic resource, given its location on a corner lot. This proposal intends to utilize the same minimally visible mechanical equipment location, which does not negatively impact the historic resource. The replacement equipment will continue to co-located with other mechanical equipment and infrastructure along the shared “mechanical corridor” shared by the neighbor to the north. Historic Preservation Benefits – Setback Variation The Applicant requests a variation to the height limit for mechanical equipment in a setback to enable mechanical equipment within a rear yard setback taller than allowed by the Code. 113 Page | 15. Kraemer Land Planning 200 Basalt Center Circle Ste 1 Basalt, Colorado 81621 This variation is requested ensure minimal impacts to the site and that there are not negative visual impacts to the historic resource. The only other potential location could be within the west side yard setback, which upon review, unfortunately creates additional view impact from Main St. and is not a viable alternative. As discussed above, the unit cannot be placed in a vault. Approval of the requested height variance for mechanical equipment within a setback will enable replacement of more efficient and quieter units, ensuring minimal impacts to a prominent historic resource. 114 Page | 16. Kraemer Land Planning 200 Basalt Center Circle Ste 1 Basalt, Colorado 81621 Section V Land Use Code Review Standards: Land Use Code Chapter 26.304 – Common Development Review Procedures Applicant Response: The Applicant understands the requirements of this section. A pre- application summary was provided on September 1st, 2023. The deposit outlined in the pre- app will be paid upon notification of completeness. If the Historic Preservation Commission grants approval, the Applicant understand that approval will be documented by issuance Resolution and Development Order that will include a three year vested right. Land Use Code Section 26.415.070 - Development Involving Designated Historic Property or Property Within a Historic District A. Certificate of appropriateness for a minor development. 1. The review and decision on the issuance of a certificate of appropriateness for minor development shall begin with a determination by the Community Development Director that the proposed project constitutes a minor development. Minor development work includes: a. Expansion or erection of a structure wherein the increase of the floor area of the structure is two hundred and fifty (250) square feet or less or Applicant Response: No increase in floor area is proposed, this criterion is not applicable. b. Alterations to a building façade, windows, doors, roof planes or material, exterior wall materials, dormer porch, exterior staircase, balcony or ornamental trim when three (3) or fewer elements are affected and the work does not qualify for a certificate of no negative effect or Applicant Response: The mechanical equipment replacement will have a minimal impact on the exterior of the structure. All changes to the exterior will be minimal, and include hanging of equipment and infrastructure associated with the primary HVAC equipment. See Exhibit K for all wiring, piping, and associated infrastructure. c. Erection or installation of a combination or multiples of awning, canopies, mechanical equipment, fencing, signs, accessory features and other attachments to designated properties such that the cumulative impact does not allow for the issuance of a certificate of no negative effect; Applicant Response: The proposed work includes a replacement of existing mechanical equipment, but due to the increased size and placement within a setback, Community Development Staff has determined the project is subject to Minor Development Review. 115 Page | 17. Kraemer Land Planning 200 Basalt Center Circle Ste 1 Basalt, Colorado 81621 d. Alterations that are made to non-historic portions of a designated historic property that do not qualify for a certificate of no negative effect; or Applicant Response: The mechanical equipment is located behind a non-historic addition at the rear (north) of the property. e. The erection of street furniture, signs, public art and other visible improvements within designated historic districts of a magnitude or in numbers such that the cumulative impact does not allow for the issuance of a certificate of no negative effect. The Community Development Director may determine that an application for work on a designated historic property involving multiple categories of minor development may result in the cumulative impact such that it is considered a major development. In such cases, the applicant shall apply for a major development review in accordance with Subsection 26.415.07(d). Applicant Response: The project is subject to Minor Development review. The HVAC equipment has minimal visibility from the street and does not negatively impact the historic resource. 2. An application for minor development shall include the following: a. The general application information required in Section 26.304.030. b. Scaled elevations and/or drawings of the proposed work and its relationship to the designated historic buildings, structures, sites and features within its vicinity. c. An accurate representation of all building materials and finishes to be used in the development. d. Photographs and other exhibits, as needed, to accurately depict location, extent and design of proposed work. e. Verification that the proposal complies with Chapter 26.410, Residential design standards or a written request for a variance from any standard that is not being met. Applicant Response: This application includes all relevant materials included in this list, as well as the materials required by the pre-application conference summary. The project is not subject to Residential Design Standard review. Land Use Code Section 26.415.110 – Historic Preservation Benefits C. Variations. Dimensional variations are allowed for projects involving designated properties to create development that is more consistent with the character of the historic property or district than what would be required by the underlying zoning's dimensional standards. 1. The HPC may grant variations of the Land Use Code for designated properties to allow: 116 Page | 18. Kraemer Land Planning 200 Basalt Center Circle Ste 1 Basalt, Colorado 81621 a. Development in the side, rear and front setbacks; Applicant Response: The application proposes mechanical equipment within the rear yard setback that requires a Variation to the height of mechanical equipment within a setback. The HVAC equipment setback variation is requested to enable more efficient equipment, that complies with the City noise ordinance, and is minimally impactful to the historic resource. Placing the equipment elsewhere on the lot would result in increased visibility and negative impacts to the prominent historic resource. b. Development that does not meet the minimum distance requirements between buildings; Applicant Response: The HVAC replacement has no impact on the minimum distance between buildings; this standard is not applicable. c. Up to five percent (5%) additional site coverage; Applicant Response: The HVAC equipment will not result in an increase in lot site coverage calculation. d. Less public amenity than required for the on-site relocation of commercial historic properties. Applicant Response: The HVAC equipment replacement is not subject to this standard; this criterion is not applicable. 2. In granting a variation, the HPC must make a finding that such a variation: a. Is similar to the pattern, features and character of the historic property or district; and/or Enhances or mitigates an adverse impact to the historic significance or architectural character of the historic property, an adjoining designated historic property or historic district. Applicant Response: The HVAC equipment placement is consistent with surrounding properties. The neighboring lot to the north contains the Quest Telecommunications building with significant equipment on the exterior of the structure and within their rear setback along the shared property line. The proposed equipment is located behind a non- historic addition, so any venting or accessory infrastructure attached to the exterior structure will not impact or alter the historic resource. The location of the HVAC equipment was previously found by the Historic Preservation Commission to be an appropriate location, with minimal impacts to the historic resource. Although the proposed equipment is taller than existing/previously approved, it results in more efficient and quieter equipment. If the equipment were relocated, it would require significant interior and exterior renovations resulting in greater impacts to the resource. Given the lack of visibility, improved efficiency, reduced noise and limited construction impacts, the proposed equipment reduces impacts and is preferrable over relocation that would otherwise create additional impacts. 117 Page | 19. Kraemer Land Planning 200 Basalt Center Circle Ste 1 Basalt, Colorado 81621 Historic Preservation Design Guidelines 1.10 Built-in furnishings, such as water features, fire pits, grills, and hot tubs, that could interfere with or block views of historic structures are inappropriate. Applicant Response: The proposed equipment does not impact views of the historic resource from either street facing façade. The proposed equipment is placed within an area with other existing mechanical equipment. The equipment is placed at the rear of a non- historic addition, adjacent to covered parking areas and a stair enclosure. The proposed equipment is also screened by existing mature vegetation. 12.4 Minimize the visual impacts of utilitarian areas, such as mechanical equipment and trash storage. • Place mechanical equipment on the ground where it can be screened. • Mechanical equipment may only be mounted on a building on an alley façade. • Rooftop mechanical equipment or vents must be grouped together to minimize their visual impact. Where rooftop units are visible, it may be appropriate to provide screening with materials that are compatible with those of the building itself. Use the smallest, low profile units available for the purpose. • Window air conditioning units are not allowed. • Minimize the visual impacts of utility connections and service boxes. Group them in a discrete location. Use pedestals, when possible, rather than mounting on a historic building. • Paint mechanical equipment in a neutral color to minimize their appearance by blending with their backgrounds • In general, mechanical equipment should be vented through the roof, rather than a wall, in a manner that has the least visual impact possible. • Avoid surface mounted conduit on historic structures. Applicant Response: The rear yard setback of this property and the Quest telecommunications building to the north, create a de-facto utility corridor. The alley for this block was vacated, so no official alley exists; however, the existing “utility corridor” between this property and the Quest building provides the best location for HVAC equipment. Additional screening was explored, but was determined to increase visual prominence of the equipment. Existing vegetation proves to adequately screen the equipment. The Applicant believes the proposed HVAC unit results in the least impacts and best outcome for the property. Placing the HVAC equipment is a partially subgrade pit would result in a larger footprint and reduced efficiency that would require increased maintenance and reduced life expectancy. The manufacturer will not provide a warranty for equipment placed in pits. 118 Page | 20. Kraemer Land Planning 200 Basalt Center Circle Ste 1 Basalt, Colorado 81621 Land Use Code Section 26.575.020 – Calculations and Measurements N. Heating and air conditioning equipment and similar mechanical equipment, but excluding generators, shall have the following requirements: 1. Prohibited between any lot line adjacent to a street and any structure; and Applicant Response: The replacement HVAC equipment is not located between a structure and a street. 2. Shall be located at least double the minimum setback for a primary structure from any lot line adjacent to a street; and Applicant Response: The proposed equipment is placed more than double the side yard setback. The HVAC equipment pad is ~44’ feet from the east property boundary. 3. If visible from the street, these features shall be screened in accordance with Section 26.575.050, Fence Materials, with natural features, or by other means determined appropriate by the Community Development Director; and Applicant Response: The proposed equipment is screened by existing vegetation and a fence and has extremely limited visibility from the street. Additional screening is not proposed in this application as fencing was determined to increase perceived massing and impacts, and would be incompatible with the architectural character of the east façade. 4. If located within a setback not adjacent to a street, these features shall not exceed thirty (30) inches above and forty-eight (48) inches below finished grade. These features may be up to thirty (30) inches above and forty-eight (48) inches below finished grade simultaneously. Applicant Response: The Applicant requests a HPC Setback Variation to enable a total of 103 inches of mechanical equipment and supporting infrastructure above grade. All equipment is necessary to ensure proper operation, maximum efficiency and equipment longevity. A 103” variation is inclusive of the concrete pad, 8” equipment stand, HVAC Figure 12: View along rear property line from S. Aspen St. 119 Page | 21. Kraemer Land Planning 200 Basalt Center Circle Ste 1 Basalt, Colorado 81621 units, and wind/hail guards installed on top of the equipment. The HVAC unit itself measure 67 inches tall. As previously stated, placing the equipment in the vault is not a viable option. If a vault were used, it would require a much larger footprint to enable access for maintenance and proper clearances for air circulation and operation. This would result in larger footprint impact, reduced efficiency, increased noise, and more frequent replacement of equipment due to additional stress from lack of adequate air flow. An exhaustive search was conducted by the design team to ensure the best equipment location was selected. The equipment has minimal visibility and limited impacts to neighboring properties. An alternative location would result in sub-optimal outcomes for the property and the Historic Resource, and the Applicant’s request for a mechanical equipment height and setback variance is the best alternative. Land Use Code Section 26.710.180 – Mixed Use (MU) Zone District Applicant Response: The relevant dimensional limitation for this project is the Minimum Rear Yard Setback requirement – 5’. The mechanical equipment sits entirely within the rear yard setback. Mechanical equipment is permitted in the rear setback, however, the unit is taller than typically allowed, as discussed above. Section VI Summary: Thank you for considering this Historic Preservation Minor Development and Setback Variation application for the replacement of existing mechanical equipment in the rear yard setback at 128 Main St. – the Sardy House. This request meets and exceeds all the applicable Land Use Code requirements for Minor Development approval, and the requested setback variance. This proposal enables replacement of the existing equipment with a more efficient, quieter, and less impactful equipment. The Applicant has provided all the requested information set forth on the pre-application summary from City of Aspen Community Development Staff. If additional information is needed, the Applicant is more than willing to assist in providing all necessary information for a complete review. Thank you, Garrett Larimer Kraemer Land Planning 120 City of Aspen Community Development Department Aspen Historic Preservation Land Use Packet City of Aspen | 130 S. Galena Street. | (970) 920 5090 Historic Land Use Application Requirements, Updated: March, 2020 ATTACHMENT 2 - Historic Preservation Land Use Application PROJECT: APPLICANT: Name: Address: Phone #: Fax#: E-mail: REPRESENTATIVE: Name: Address: Phone #: Fax#: E-mail: TYPE OF APPLICATION: (please check all that apply): EXISTING CONDITIONS: (description of existing buildings, uses, previous approvals, etc.) PROPOSAL: (description of proposed buildings, uses, modifications, etc.) Name: Location: (Indicate street address, lot & block number or metes and bounds description of property) Parcel ID # (REQUIRED)  Historic Designation  Certificate of No Negative Effect Certificate of Appropriateness  Minor Historic Development  Major Historic Development Conceptual Historic Development Final Historic Development  Relocation (temporary, on or off-site)  Demolition (total demolition)  Substantial Amendment  Historic Landmark Lot Split Sardy House Mechanical Equipment Replacement 128 E. Main St., Aspen, CO 81611 CITY AND TOWNSITE OF ASPEN Block: 66 Lot: P AND:- Lot: Thru S & S 25' OF LOTS F - I (full legal description in Title Committment) 273512438005 BTRSardy LLC PO Box 61239, Palo Alto, CA 94306 303-641-1885 garrett@kraemerlandplanning.com Garrett Larimer, Kraemer Land Planning PO Box 3275, Basalt, CO 81621 303-641-1885 garrett@kraemerlandplanning.com Existing mechanical equipment located within rear yard setback to be replaced. Equipment origanally approved via HPC Resolution No. 05-2003. Upgrade and replace existing mechanical equipment in same location. No changes to structure proposed. Exhibit A 121 City of Aspen Community Development Department Aspen Historic Preservation Land Use Packet City of Aspen | 130 S. Galena Street. | (970) 920 5090 Historic Land Use Application Requirements, Updated: March, 2020 General Information Please check the appropriate boxes below and submit this page along with your application. This information will help us review your plans and, if necessary, coordinate with other agencies that may be involved. YES NO   Does the work you are planning include exterior work; including additions, demolitions, new construction, remodeling, rehabilitation or restoration?   Does the work you are planning include interior work, including remodeling, rehabilitation, or restoration?   Do you plan other future changes or improvements that could be reviewed at this time?   In addition to City of Aspen approval for a Certificate of Appropriateness or No Negative Effect and a building permit, are you seeking to meet the Secretary of the Interior’s Standards for Rehabilitation or restoration of a National Register of Historic Places Property in order to qualify for state or federal tax credits?   If yes, are you seeking federal rehabilitation investment tax credits in Conjunction with this project? (Only income producing properties listed on the National Register are eligible. Owner-occupied residential properties are not.)   If yes, are you seeking the Colorado State Income Tax Credit for Historical Preservation? Please check all City of Aspen Historic Preservation Benefits which you plan to use:  Rehabilitation Loan Fund  Dimensional Variances  Tax Credits  Increased Density  Conservation Easement Program  Waiver of Park Dedication Fees  Conditional Uses  Historic Landmark Lot Split 122 City of Aspen Community Development Department Aspen Historic Preservation Land Use Packet City of Aspen | 130 S. Galena Street. | (970) 920 5090 Historic Land Use Application Requirements, Updated: March, 2020 ATTACHMENT 3 - Dimensional Requirements Form (Item #10 on the submittal requirements key. Not necessary for all projects.) Project: Applicant: Project Location: Zone District: Lot Size: Lot Area: (For the purposes of calculating Floor Area, Lot Area may be reduced for areas within the high-water mark, easements, and steep slopes. Please refer to the definition of Lot Area in the Municipal Code.) Commercial net leasable: Existing: Proposed: Number of residential units: Existing: Proposed: _______________________________ Proposed % of demolition: ____________________________________% DIMENSIONS: (write N/A where no requirement exists in the zone district) Floor Area: Height Existing: Allowable: Proposed: Principal Bldg.: Existing: Allowable: Proposed: Accessory Bldg.: Existing: Allowable: Proposed: On-Site parking: Existing: Required: Proposed: % Site coverage: Existing: Required: Proposed: % Open Space: Existing: Required: Proposed: Front Setback: Existing: Required: Proposed: Rear Setback: Existing: Required: Proposed: Combined Front/Rear: Indicate N, S, E, W Existing: Required: Proposed: _______________ Side Setback: Existing: Required: Proposed: Side Setback: Existing: Required: Proposed: Combined Sides: Existing: Required: Proposed: Distance between buildings Existing: Required: Proposed: Existing non-conformities or encroachments and note if encroachment licenses have been issued: Variations requested (identify the exact variances needed): Sardy House Mechanical Equipment replacement BTRSardy LLC 128 E. Main St. Mixed Use (MU) 17,444 14,998 No change No change 0 No change No change No change No change No change No change No change No change Variation to height limit of HVAC in rear setback requested. No change No change N/A No change Encroachment license exists for subgrade utilities in Main St. ROW. Existing mechanical equipment in rear yard setback exceeds height limit for HVAC in a setback and was approved by the HPC (Reso. 05-2003) Application requests variation to height limit of HVAC in rear yard setback. See application letter and proposed drawings for specifications. 123 2/14/2024 Cristina Rosado Exhibit B 124 City of Aspen Community Development Department Aspen Historic Preservation Land Use Packet City of Aspen | 130 S. Galena Street. | (970) 920 5090 Historic Land Use Application Requirements, Updated: March, 2020 City Use: Fees Due: $ Received $ Agreement to Pay Application Fees An agreement between the City of Aspen (“City”) and Property Phone No.: Owner (“I”): Email: Address of Billing Property: Address: (Subject of (send bills here) application) I understand that the City has adopted, via Ordinance No., Series of 2011, review fees for Land Use applications and payment of these fees is a condition precedent to determining application completeness. I understand that as the property owner that I am responsible for paying all fees for this development application. For flat fees and referral fees: I agree to pay the following fees for the services indicated. I understand that these flat fees are non-refundable. $ flat fee for $ flat fee for $ flat fee for $ flat fee for For Deposit cases only: The City and I understand that because of the size, nature or scope of the proposed project, it is not possible at this time to know the full extent or total costs involved in processing the application. I understand that additional costs over and above the deposit may accrue. I understand and agree that it is impracticable for City staff to complete processing, review and presentation of sufficient information to enable legally required findings to be made for project consideration, unless invoices are paid in full. The City and I understand and agree that invoices mailed by the City to the above listed billing address and not returned to the City shall be considered by the City as being received by me. I agree to remit payment within 30 days of presentation of an invoice by the City for such services. I have read, understood, and agree to the Land Use Review Fee Policy including consequences for no-payment. I agree to pay the following initial deposit amounts for the specified hours of staff time. I understand that payment of a deposit does not render and application complete or compliant with approval criteria. If actual recorded costs exceed the initial deposit, I agree to pay additional monthly billings to the City to reimburse the City for the processing of my application at the hourly rates hereinafter stated. $ deposit for hours of Community Development Department staff time. Additional time above the deposit amount will be billed at $325.00 per hour. $ deposit for hours of Engineering Department staff time. Additional time above the deposit amount will be billed at $325.00 per hour. City of Aspen: Property Owner: Phillip Supino, AICP Community Development Director Name: Title: 128 E. Main St. Sardy House 1,300 4 BTRSARDY LLC Please send invoices to: Brewster McLeod Architects Jamie L Brewster McLeod P.O. Box 697 Aspen, CO 81611 970-544-0130 Cristina Rosado Authorized Signer Exhibit C 125 Cristina Rosado / Authorized Signer February 14 Exhibit D 126 Customer Distribution Prevent fraud - Please call a member of our closing team for wire transfer instructions or to initiate a wire transfer. Note that our wiring instructions will never change. Order Number: Q62016950 Date: 02/14/2024 Property Address: 128 E MAIN ST, ASPEN, CO 81611 For Closing Assistance For Title Assistance Land Title Roaring Fork Valley Title Team 533 E HOPKINS #102 ASPEN, CO 81611 (970) 927-0405 (Work) (970) 925-0610 (Work Fax) valleyresponse@ltgc.com Seller/Owner BTRSARDY LLC Delivered via: No Commitment Delivery Agent for Seller DOUGLAS ELLIMAN REAL ESTATE Attention: JULIA HERMAN 630 E HYMAN AVE #101 ASPEN, CO 81611 (970) 379-1907 (Cell) (970) 925-8810 (Work) (970) 925-8821 (Work Fax) julia.herman@elliman.com Delivered via: Electronic Mail Exhibit E 127 Copyright 2006-2024 American Land Title Association. All rights reserved. The use of this Form is restricted to ALTA licensees and ALTA members in good standing as of the date of use. All other uses are prohibited. Reprinted under license from the American Land Title Association. Property Address: 128 E MAIN ST, ASPEN, CO 81611 1.Effective Date: 02/02/2024 at 5:00 P.M. 2.Policy to be Issued and Proposed Insured: "TBD" Commitment Proposed Insured: TO BE DETERMINED $0.00 3.The estate or interest in the land described or referred to in this Commitment and covered herein is: FEE SIMPLE 4.Title to the estate or interest covered herein is at the effective date hereof vested in: BTRSARDY, LLC, A CALIFORNIA LIMITED LIABILITY COMPANY 5.The Land referred to in this Commitment is described as follows: LOTS F,G,H, AND I LESS THE NORTHERLY 75 FEET THEREOF, AND ALL OF LOTS P,Q,R, AND S AND THAT PART OF THE VACATED ALLEY BOUNDED BY THE EXTENSION OF THE EASTERLY LOT LINES OF LOTS I AND S AND THE WESTERLY LOT LINES OF LOTS F AND P, ALL IN BLOCK 66, ​ CITY AND TOWNSITE OF ASPEN.​ COUNTY OF PITKIN, STATE OF COLORADO ALTA COMMITMENT Old Republic National Title Insurance Company Schedule A Order Number:Q62016950 128 ALTA COMMITMENT Old Republic National Title Insurance Company Schedule B, Part I (Requirements) Order Number: Q62016950 All of the following Requirements must be met: This proposed Insured must notify the Company in writing of the name of any party not referred to in this Commitment who will obtain an interest in the Land or who will make a loan on the Land. The Company may then make additional Requirements or Exceptions. Pay the agreed amount for the estate or interest to be insured. Pay the premiums, fees, and charges for the Policy to the Company. Documents satisfactory to the Company that convey the Title or create the Mortgage to be insured, or both, must be properly authorized, executed, delivered, and recorded in the Public Records. 1.EVIDENCE SATISFACTORY TO THE COMPANY THAT THE TERMS, CONDITIONS AND PROVISIONS OF THE TOWN OF ASPEN TRANSFER TAX HAVE BEEN SATISFIED. 2.PROVIDE LAND TITLE GUARANTEE COMPANY WITH A CURRENT IMPROVEMENT SURVEY PLAT OF SUBJECT PROPERTY. UPON REVIEW, ADDITIONAL REQUIREMENTS AND/OR EXCEPTIONS MAY BE NECESSARY. LAND TITLE IS NOT RESPONSIBLE FOR ORDERING SAID IMPROVEMENT SURVEY PLAT. SAID SURVEY MUST BE CERTIFIED TO LAND TITLE GUARANTEE COMPANY AND OLD REPUBLIC NATIONAL TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY. 3.CERTIFICATE OF GOOD STANDING OF BTRSARDY, LLC, A CALIFORNIA LIMITED LIABILITY COMPANY, ISSUED BY THE SECRETARY OF STATE OF CALIFORNIA. 4.A FULL COPY OF THE FULLY EXECUTED OPERATING AGREEMENT AND ANY AND ALL AMENDMENTS THERETO FOR BTRSARDY, LLC, A CALIFORNIA LIMITED LIABILITY COMPANY MUST BE FURNISHED TO LAND TITLE GUARANTEE COMPANY. SAID AGREEMENT MUST DISCLOSE WHO MAY CONVEY, ACQUIRE, ENCUMBER, LEASE OR OTHERWISE DEAL WITH INTERESTS IN REAL PROPERTY FOR SAID ENTITY. NOTE: ADDITIONAL REQUIREMENTS MAY BE NECESSARY UPON REVIEW OF THIS DOCUMENTATION. 5.WRITTEN CONFIRMATION THAT THE INFORMATION CONTAINED IN STATEMENT OF AUTHORITY FOR BTRSARDY, LLC, A CALIFORNIA LIMITED LIABILITY COMPANY RECORDED APRIL 27, 2016 UNDER RECEPTION NO. 628891 IS CURRENT. NOTE: SAID INSTRUMENT DISCLOSES HARVEY L. ARMSTRONG AS THE AUTHORIZED SIGNATORY FOR CTC MYCFO, LLC, AS MANAGER WHO IS AUTHORIZED TO EXECUTE INSTRUMENTS CONVEYING, ENCUMBERING OR OTHERWISE AFFECTING TITLE TO REAL PROPERTY ON BEHALF OF SAID ENTITY. IF THIS INFORMATION IS NOT ACCURATE, A CURRENT STATEMENT OF AUTHORITY MUST BE RECORDED. 6.SPECIAL WARRANTY DEED FROM BTRSARDY, LLC, A CALIFORNIA LIMITED LIABILITY COMPANY TO TO BE DETERMINED CONVEYING SUBJECT PROPERTY. NOTE: ADDITIONAL REQUIREMENTS OR EXCEPTIONS MAY BE NECESSARY WHEN THE BUYERS NAMES ARE ADDED TO THIS COMMITMENT. COVERAGES AND/OR CHARGES REFLECTED HEREIN, IF ANY, ARE SUBJECT TO CHANGE UPON RECEIPT OF THE CONTRACT TO BUY AND SELL REAL ESTATE AND ANY AMENDMENTS THERETO. 129 This commitment does not republish any covenants, condition, restriction, or limitation contained in any document referred to in this commitment to the extent that the specific covenant, conditions, restriction, or limitation violates state or federal law based on race, color, religion, sex, sexual orientation, gender identity, handicap, familial status, or national origin. 1.Any facts, rights, interests, or claims thereof, not shown by the Public Records but that could be ascertained by an inspection of the Land or that may be asserted by persons in possession of the Land. 2.Easements, liens or encumbrances, or claims thereof, not shown by the Public Records. 3.Any encroachment, encumbrance, violation, variation, or adverse circumstance affecting the Title that would be disclosed by an accurate and complete land survey of the Land and not shown by the Public Records. 4.Any lien, or right to a lien, for services, labor or material heretofore or hereafter furnished, imposed by law and not shown by the Public Records. 5.Defects, liens, encumbrances, adverse claims or other matters, if any, created, first appearing in the public records or attaching subsequent to the effective date hereof but prior to the date of the proposed insured acquires of record for value the estate or interest or mortgage thereon covered by this Commitment. 6.(a) Taxes or assessments that are not shown as existing liens by the records of any taxing authority that levies taxes or assessments on real property or by the Public Records; (b) proceedings by a public agency that may result in taxes or assessments, or notices of such proceedings, whether or not shown by the records of such agency or by the Public Records. 7.(a) Unpatented mining claims; (b) reservations or exceptions in patents or in Acts authorizing the issuance thereof; (c) water rights, claims or title to water. 8.EXISTING LEASES AND TENANCIES. 9.RESERVATIONS AND EXCEPTIONS AS SET FORTH IN THE DEED FROM THE CITY OF ASPEN RECORDED FEBRUARY 03, 1888 IN BOOK 59 AT PAGE 337 AND RECORDED OCTOBER 25, 1887 IN BOOK 59 AT PAGE 57 PROVIDING AS FOLLOWS: THAT NO TITLE SHALL BE HEREBY ACQUIRED TO ANY MINE OF GOLD, SILVER, CINNABAR OR COPPER OR TO ANY VALID MINING CLAIM OR POSSESSION HELD UNDER EXISTING LAWS. 10.TERMS, CONDITIONS AND PROVISIONS OF ORDINANCE BY THE CITY OF ASPEN, NO. 2, SERIES OF 1961 VACATING ALLEY AND UTILITY EASEMENT RECORDED MAY 01, 1961 IN BOOK 194 AT PAGE 7. 11.TERMS, CONDITIONS AND PROVISIONS OF DEED RECORDED JANUARY 31, 1961 IN BOOK 193 AT PAGE 89. 12.TERMS, CONDITIONS AND PROVISIONS OF ORDINANCE BY THE CITY OF ASPEN, NO. 60, SERIES OF 1976 RECORDED DECEMBER 09, 1976 IN BOOK 321 AT PAGE 51. 13.TERMS, CONDITIONS, PROVISIONS AND OBLIGATIONS OF ENCROACHMENT AGREEMENT WITH THE CITY OF ASPEN RECORDED DECEMBER 12, 1990 IN BOOK 635 AT PAGE 931 AND ASSIGNMENT THEREOF RECORDED NOVEMBER 13, 2006 AS RECEPTION NO. 531003. 14.TERMS, CONDITIONS, PROVISIONS AND OBLIGATIONS OF NOTICE OF APPROVAL BY CITY OF ASPEN COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT RECORDED JULY 18, 2017 AS RECEPTION NO. 639981. 15.TERMS, CONDITIONS, PROVISIONS AND OBLIGATIONS OF RESOLUTION BY THE CITY OF ASPEN HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION, NO. 22, SERIES OF 2017 RECORDED OCTOBER 26, 2017 AS RECEPTION NO. 642615. ALTA COMMITMENT Old Republic National Title Insurance Company Schedule B, Part II (Exceptions) Order Number: Q62016950 130 16.TERMS, CONDITIONS, PROVISIONS AND OBLIGATIONS OF ADMINISTRATIVE DETERMINATION BY CITY OF ASPEN COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT RECORDED FEBRUARY 5, 2019 AS RECEPTION NO. 653801. 17.CLAIMS OF RIGHT, TITLE AND/OR INTEREST IN THE PROPERTY BETWEEN THE BOUNDARY LINE AND THE FENCE AS DEPICTED ON THE SURVEY PREPARED BY SOPRIS ENGINEERING LLC, JOB NO. 16069 WHETHER SAID CLAIMS ARISE BY ABANDONMENT, ADVERSE POSSESSION OR OTHER MEANS. SAID DOCUMENT STORE AS OUR IMAGE 65142915 ALTA COMMITMENT Old Republic National Title Insurance Company Schedule B, Part II (Exceptions) Order Number: Q62016950 131 Land Title Guarantee Company Disclosure Statements Note: Pursuant to CRS 10-11-122, notice is hereby given that: Note: Effective September 1, 1997, CRS 30-10-406 requires that all documents received for recording or filing in the clerk and recorder's office shall contain a top margin of at least one inch and a left, right and bottom margin of at least one half of an inch. The clerk and recorder may refuse to record or file any document that does not conform, except that, the requirement for the top margin shall not apply to documents using forms on which space is provided for recording or filing information at the top margin of the document. Note: Colorado Division of Insurance Regulations 8-1-2 requires that "Every title entity shall be responsible for all matters which appear of record prior to the time of recording whenever the title entity conducts the closing and is responsible for recording or filing of legal documents resulting from the transaction which was closed". Provided that Land Title Guarantee Company conducts the closing of the insured transaction and is responsible for recording the legal documents from the transaction, exception number 5 will not appear on the Owner's Title Policy and the Lenders Policy when issued. Note: Affirmative mechanic's lien protection for the Owner may be available (typically by deletion of Exception no. 4 of Schedule B, Section 2 of the Commitment from the Owner's Policy to be issued) upon compliance with the following conditions: No coverage will be given under any circumstances for labor or material for which the insured has contracted for or agreed to pay. Note: Pursuant to CRS 10-11-123, notice is hereby given: The Subject real property may be located in a special taxing district.(A) A certificate of taxes due listing each taxing jurisdiction will be obtained from the county treasurer of the county in which the real property is located or that county treasurer's authorized agent unless the proposed insured provides written instructions to the contrary. (for an Owner's Policy of Title Insurance pertaining to a sale of residential real property). (B) The information regarding special districts and the boundaries of such districts may be obtained from the Board of County Commissioners, the County Clerk and Recorder, or the County Assessor. (C) The land described in Schedule A of this commitment must be a single family residence which includes a condominium or townhouse unit. (A) No labor or materials have been furnished by mechanics or material-men for purposes of construction on the land described in Schedule A of this Commitment within the past 6 months. (B) The Company must receive an appropriate affidavit indemnifying the Company against un-filed mechanic's and material-men's liens. (C) The Company must receive payment of the appropriate premium.(D) If there has been construction, improvements or major repairs undertaken on the property to be purchased within six months prior to the Date of Commitment, the requirements to obtain coverage for unrecorded liens will include: disclosure of certain construction information; financial information as to the seller, the builder and or the contractor; payment of the appropriate premium fully executed Indemnity Agreements satisfactory to the company, and, any additional requirements as may be necessary after an examination of the aforesaid information by the Company. (E) 132 This notice applies to owner's policy commitments disclosing that a mineral estate has been severed from the surface estate, in Schedule B-2. Note: Pursuant to CRS 10-1-128(6)(a), It is unlawful to knowingly provide false, incomplete, or misleading facts or information to an insurance company for the purpose of defrauding or attempting to defraud the company. Penalties may include imprisonment, fines, denial of insurance, and civil damages. Any insurance company or agent of an insurance company who knowingly provides false, incomplete, or misleading facts or information to a policyholder or claimant for the purpose of defrauding or attempting to defraud the policyholder or claimant with regard to a settlement or award payable from insurance proceeds shall be reported to the Colorado Division of Insurance within the Department of Regulatory Agencies. Note: Pursuant to Colorado Division of Insurance Regulations 8-1-3, notice is hereby given of the availability of a closing protection letter for the lender, purchaser, lessee or seller in connection with this transaction. Note: Pursuant to CRS 24-21-514.5, Colorado notaries may remotely notarize real estate deeds and other documents using real-time audio-video communication technology. You may choose not to use remote notarization for any document. That there is recorded evidence that a mineral estate has been severed, leased, or otherwise conveyed from the surface estate and that there is substantial likelihood that a third party holds some or all interest in oil, gas, other minerals, or geothermal energy in the property; and (A) That such mineral estate may include the right to enter and use the property without the surface owner's permission. (B) 133 Joint Notice of Privacy Policy of Land Title Guarantee Company Land Title Insurance Corporation and Old Republic National Title Insurancy Company This Statement is provided to you as a customer of Land Title Guarantee Company as agent for Land Title Insurance Corporation and Old Republic National Title Insurance Company. We want you to know that we recognize and respect your privacy expectations and the requirements of federal and state privacy laws. Information security is one of our highest priorities. We recognize that maintaining your trust and confidence is the bedrock of our business. We maintain and regularly review internal and external safeguards against unauthorized access to your non-public personal information ("Personal Information"). In the course of our business, we may collect Personal Information about you from: applications or other forms we receive from you, including communications sent through TMX, our web-based transaction management system; your transactions with, or from the services being performed by us, our affiliates, or others; a consumer reporting agency, if such information is provided to us in connection with your transaction; and The public records maintained by governmental entities that we obtain either directly from those entities, or from our affiliates and non-affiliates. Our policies regarding the protection of the confidentiality and security of your Personal Information are as follows: We restrict access to all Personal Information about you to those employees who need to know that information in order to provide products and services to you. We may share your Personal Information with affiliated contractors or service providers who provide services in the course of our business, but only to the extent necessary for these providers to perform their services and to provide these services to you as may be required by your transaction. We maintain physical, electronic and procedural safeguards that comply with federal standards to protect your Personal Information from unauthorized access or intrusion. Employees who violate our strict policies and procedures regarding privacy are subject to disciplinary action. We regularly assess security standards and procedures to protect against unauthorized access to Personal Information. WE DO NOT DISCLOSE ANY PERSONAL INFORMATION ABOUT YOU WITH ANYONE FOR ANY PURPOSE THAT IS NOT STATED ABOVE OR PERMITTED BY LAW. Consistent with applicable privacy laws, there are some situations in which Personal Information may be disclosed. We may disclose your Personal Information when you direct or give us permission; when we are required by law to do so, for example, if we are served a subpoena; or when we suspect fraudulent or criminal activities. We also may disclose your Personal Information when otherwise permitted by applicable privacy laws such as, for example, when disclosure is needed to enforce our rights arising out of any agreement, transaction or relationship with you. Our policy regarding dispute resolution is as follows: Any controversy or claim arising out of or relating to our privacy policy, or the breach thereof, shall be settled by arbitration in accordance with the rules of the American Arbitration 134 Association, and judgment upon the award rendered by the arbitrator(s) may be entered in any court having jurisdiction thereof. 135 Commitment For Title Insurance Issued by Old Republic National Title Insurance Company NOTICE IMPORTANT—READ CAREFULLY: THIS COMMITMENT IS AN OFFER TO ISSUE ONE OR MORE TITLE INSURANCE POLICIES. ALL CLAIMS OR REMEDIES SOUGHT AGAINST THE COMPANY INVOLVING THE CONTENT OF THIS COMMITMENT OR THE POLICY MUST BE BASED SOLELY IN CONTRACT. THIS COMMITMENT IS NOT AN ABSTRACT OF TITLE, REPORT OF THE CONDITION OF TITLE, LEGAL OPINION, OPINION OF TITLE, OR OTHER REPRESENTATION OF THE STATUS OF TITLE. THE PROCEDURES USED BY THE COMPANY TO DETERMINE INSURABILITY OF THE TITLE, INCLUDING ANY SEARCH AND EXAMINATION, ARE PROPRIETARY TO THE COMPANY, WERE PERFORMED SOLELY FOR THE BENEFIT OF THE COMPANY, AND CREATE NO EXTRACONTRACTUAL LIABILITY TO ANY PERSON, INCLUDING A PROPOSED INSURED. THE COMPANY’S OBLIGATION UNDER THIS COMMITMENT IS TO ISSUE A POLICY TO A PROPOSED INSURED IDENTIFIED IN SCHEDULE A IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE TERMS AND PROVISIONS OF THIS COMMITMENT. THE COMPANY HAS NO LIABILITY OR OBLIGATION INVOLVING THE CONTENT OF THIS COMMITMENT TO ANY OTHER PERSON. . COMMITMENT TO ISSUE POLICY Subject to the Notice; Schedule B, Part I—Requirements; Schedule B, Part II—Exceptions; and the Commitment Conditions, Old Republic National Title Insurance Company, a Minnesota corporation (the “Company”), commits to issue the Policy according to the terms and provisions of this Commitment. This Commitment is effective as of the Commitment Date shown in Schedule A for each Policy described in Schedule A, only when the Company has entered in Schedule A both the specified dollar amount as the Proposed Policy Amount and the name of the Proposed Insured. If all of the Schedule B, Part I—Requirements have not been met within 6 months after the Commitment Date, this Commitment terminates and the Company’s liability and obligation end. COMMITMENT CONDITIONS 1. DEFINITIONS 2. If all of the Schedule B, Part I—Requirements have not been met within the time period specified in the Commitment to Issue Policy, Commitment terminates and the Company’s liability and obligation end. 3. The Company’s liability and obligation is limited by and this Commitment is not valid without: 4. COMPANY’S RIGHT TO AMEND The Company may amend this Commitment at any time. If the Company amends this Commitment to add a defect, lien, encumbrance, adverse claim, or other matter recorded in the Public Records prior to the Commitment Date, any liability of the Company is limited by Commitment Condition 5. The Company shall not be liable for any other amendment to this Commitment. 5. LIMITATIONS OF LIABILITY i. comply with the Schedule B, Part I—Requirements; ii. eliminate, with the Company’s written consent, any Schedule B, Part II—Exceptions; or iii. acquire the Title or create the Mortgage covered by this Commitment. 6. LIABILITY OF THE COMPANY MUST BE BASED ON THIS COMMITMENT “Knowledge” or “Known”: Actual or imputed knowledge, but not constructive notice imparted by the Public Records.(a) “Land”: The land described in Schedule A and affixed improvements that by law constitute real property. The term “Land” does not include any property beyond the lines of the area described in Schedule A, nor any right, title, interest, estate, or easement in abutting streets, roads, avenues, alleys, lanes, ways, or waterways, but this does not modify or limit the extent that a right of access to and from the Land is to be insured by the Policy. (b) “Mortgage”: A mortgage, deed of trust, or other security instrument, including one evidenced by electronic means authorized by law.(c) “Policy”: Each contract of title insurance, in a form adopted by the American Land Title Association, issued or to be issued by the Company pursuant to this Commitment. (d) “Proposed Insured”: Each person identified in Schedule A as the Proposed Insured of each Policy to be issued pursuant to this Commitment.(e) “Proposed Policy Amount”: Each dollar amount specified in Schedule A as the Proposed Policy Amount of each Policy to be issued pursuant to this Commitment. (f) “Public Records”: Records established under state statutes at the Commitment Date for the purpose of imparting constructive notice of matters relating to real property to purchasers for value and without Knowledge. (g) “Title”: The estate or interest described in Schedule A.(h) the Notice;(a) the Commitment to Issue Policy;(b) the Commitment Conditions;(c) Schedule A;(d) Schedule B, Part I—Requirements; and(e) Schedule B, Part II—Exceptions; and(f) a counter-signature by the Company or its issuing agent that may be in electronic form.(g) The Company’s liability under Commitment Condition 4 is limited to the Proposed Insured’s actual expense incurred in the interval between the Company’s delivery to the Proposed Insured of the Commitment and the delivery of the amended Commitment, resulting from the Proposed Insured’s good faith reliance to: (a) The Company shall not be liable under Commitment Condition 5(a) if the Proposed Insured requested the amendment or had Knowledge of the matter and did not notify the Company about it in writing. (b) The Company will only have liability under Commitment Condition 4 if the Proposed Insured would not have incurred the expense had the Commitment included the added matter when the Commitment was first delivered to the Proposed Insured. (c) The Company’s liability shall not exceed the lesser of the Proposed Insured’s actual expense incurred in good faith and described in Commitment Conditions 5(a)(i) through 5(a)(iii) or the Proposed Policy Amount. (d) The Company shall not be liable for the content of the Transaction Identification Data, if any.(e) In no event shall the Company be obligated to issue the Policy referred to in this Commitment unless all of the Schedule B, Part I—Requirements have been met to the satisfaction of the Company. (f) In any event, the Company’s liability is limited by the terms and provisions of the Policy.(g) Only a Proposed Insured identified in Schedule A, and no other person, may make a claim under this Commitment.(a) Any claim must be based in contract and must be restricted solely to the terms and provisions of this Commitment.(b) Until the Policy is issued, this Commitment, as last revised, is the exclusive and entire agreement between the parties with respect to the subject matter of this Commitment and supersedes all prior commitment negotiations, representations, and proposals of any kind, whether written or oral, express or implied, relating to the subject matter of this Commitment. (c) 136 7. IF THIS COMMITMENT HAS BEEN ISSUED BY AN ISSUING AGENT The issuing agent is the Company’s agent only for the limited purpose of issuing title insurance commitments and policies. The issuing agent is not the Company’s agent for the purpose of providing closing or settlement services. 8. PRO-FORMA POLICY The Company may provide, at the request of a Proposed Insured, a pro-forma policy illustrating the coverage that the Company may provide. A pro-forma policy neither reflects the status of Title at the time that the pro-forma policy is delivered to a Proposed Insured, nor is it a commitment to insure. 9. ARBITRATION The Policy contains an arbitration clause. All arbitrable matters when the Proposed Policy Amount is $2,000,000 or less shall be arbitrated at the option of either the Company or the Proposed Insured as the exclusive remedy of the parties. A Proposed Insured may review a copy of the arbitration rules at http://www.alta.org/arbitration. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, Land Title Insurance Corporation has caused its corporate name and seal to be affixed by its duly authorized officers on the date shown in Schedule A to be valid when countersigned by a validating officer or other authorized signatory. Issued by: Land Title Guarantee Company 3033 East First Avenue Suite 600 Denver, Colorado 80206 303-321-1880 Craig B. Rants, Senior Vice President This page is only a part of a 2016 ALTA® Commitment for Title Insurance issued by Old Republic National Title Insurance Company. This Commitment is not valid without the Notice; the Commitment to Issue Policy; the Commitment Conditions; Schedule A; Schedule B, Part I—Requirements; and Schedule B, Part II —Exceptions; and a counter-signature by the Company or its issuing agent that may be in electronic form. Copyright 2006-2016 American Land Title Association. All rights reserved. The use of this Form (or any derivative thereof) is restricted to ALTA licensees and ALTA members in good standing as of the date of use. All other uses are prohibited. Reprinted under license from the American Land Title Association. The deletion or modification of any Schedule B, Part II—Exception does not constitute an agreement or obligation to provide coverage beyond the terms and provisions of this Commitment or the Policy. (d) Any amendment or endorsement to this Commitment must be in writing and authenticated by a person authorized by the Company.(e) When the Policy is issued, all liability and obligation under this Commitment will end and the Company’s only liability will be under the Policy.(f) 137 Exhibit F 138 139 140 PRE-APPLICATION CONFERENCE SUMMARY DATE: September 1, 2023 PLANNER: Amy Simon, Planning Director, amy.simon@aspen.gov REPRESENTATIVE: Jamie Brewster McLeod, jamie@brewstermcleod.com PROJECT LOCATION: 128 E. Main Street REQUEST: Historic Preservation – Minor Development Review, Variation DESCRIPTION: 128 E. Main Street, also known as the Sardy House, is a significant historic landmark located in the Main Street Historic District. The property owner proposes to replace outdated mechanical equipment that is located along the northern property line. The existing equipment was approved by the Historic Preservation Commission, including the granting of a setback variation, in 2003. The replacement equipment is larger than what is in place now, in part because of features that improve energy efficiency and reduce the noise created by the unit when it is operating. The replacement equipment again requires Minor Development and Setback Variation review. HPC must consider whether the relevant review criteria in Section 26.415 of the Municipal Code, the Historic Preservation Design Guidelines and the Commercial, Lodging and Historic District Design Standards and Guidelines are met for the work to proceed. RELEVANT LAND USE CODE SECTIONS: Section Number Section Title 26.304 Common Development Review Procedures 26.415.070.C Historic Preservation, Minor Development Review 26.415.110.C Historic Preservation Benefits, Variations 26.575.020 Calculations and Measurements 26.710.180 Mixed Use, MU Zone District For your convenience – links to the Land Use Application, Design Guidelines and Land Use Code are below: Application Historic Preservation Design Guidelines Municipal Code Review by: Staff for completeness, Historic Preservation Commission (HPC) for approval. Public Hearing: Yes Referrals: Staff may seek referral comments from the Building Department, Zoning, Engineering and Parks regarding any relevant code requirements or considerations. There will be no Development Review Committee meeting or referral fees. Exhibit G 141 Planning Fees: $1,300 for 4 billable hours of staff time. (Additional/ lesser hours will be billed/ refunded at a rate of $325 per hour.) Referral Agencies Fee: $0. Total Deposit: $1,300. APPLICATION CHECKLIST: Below is a list of submittal requirements for this review. Please email the entire application as one pdf to kirsten.armstrong@aspen.gov. The fee will be requested after the application is determined to be complete.  Completed Land Use Application and signed Fee Agreement  Pre-application Conference Summary (this document).  Street address and legal description of the parcel on which development is proposed to occur, consisting of a current (no older than 6 months) certificate from a title insurance company, an ownership and encumbrance report, or attorney licensed to practice in the State of Colorado, listing the names of all owners of the property, and all mortgages, judgments, liens, easements, contracts and agreements affecting the parcel, and demonstrating the owner’s right to apply for the Development Application.  Applicant’s name, address and telephone number in a letter signed by the applicant that states the name, address and telephone number of the representative authorized to act on behalf of the applicant.  HOA Compliance form (last page of this preapplication).  List of adjacent property owners within 300’ for public hearing.  An 8 1/2” by 11” vicinity map locating the parcel within the City of Aspen.  Site improvement survey showing all existing conditions including topography and vegetation, certified by a registered land surveyor, licensed in the state of Colorado.  A written description of the proposal (scope of work) and written explanation of how the proposed development complies with the review standards and design guidelines relevant to the application.  A proposed site plan showing setbacks and property boundaries.  Existing and proposed elevations clearly showing the areas of change.  An accurate representation of all building materials and finishes to be used in the development. Please include relevant cut-sheets for all materials for review.  Supplemental materials to provide a visual description of the context surrounding the designated historic property including photographs and other exhibits, as needed, to accurately depict location and extent of proposed work. Disclaimer: The foregoing summary is advisory in nature only and is not binding on the City. The summary is based on current zoning, which is subject to change in the future, and upon factual representations that may or may not be accurate. The summary does not create a legal or vested right. 142 Hunter Creek Roaring Fork River Hallam Lake Roaring Fork River Roaring Fork River Shady L n W Gille spi e S t N 3r d St W North S t N 4 th St M e ado w s R d W S muggler St N 6 t h S t S 1 st St N 5 t h St L a k e A v e N 2 n d St N 1st St W H a llam S t W B l e eker S t E H opkins Ave N 7 t h St Hallam Lake Little Cloud Park Aspen Center for Physics 6th & Main IN Main St + 4th St Benedict Music Tent Aspen Community Church US Forest Service, Aspen Tyrolean Lodge Sardy House St Moritz Lodge S M ill S t Barbee Center Lode Mining Claim Little Cloud Wagner Park Koch Lumber Park Wheeler Park Willoughby ParK Lift One A Park Aspen St + Cooper Ave Lift 1 Rio Grande Drain H u nter C r e ek Re d M o u n t a i n R d Gib s o n A v e V in e St NealeAve Jenny Adair Park Rubey Lot 6/ Williams Woods Rubey Galena Street Shuttle Park Circle & Spruce Lone Pine II Mill & Main Clarks Mkt Theater Aspen Pitkin County Administration and Sheriff's Office Eagles Club 184 Aspen Aspen Old Powerhouse Aspen S We s t E n d S t E D e an S t Waters A v e S O r i gi n a l S t Aspen Mtn Base Area Rubey Park Transit Center Aspen Square Hotel The Aspen Mountain Residences The Residence Hotel Date: 2/20/2024 Geographic Information Systems This map/drawing/image is a graphical representation of the features depicted and is not a legal representation. The accuracy may change depending on the enlargement or reduction. Copyright 2024 City of Aspen GIS 0 0.1 0.20.05 mi When printed at 8.5"x11" 4 Legend Driveways Aspen City Limits UGB Water Line Zoomed In Water Poly Parcels Structures Scale: 1:9,028 City of Aspen GIS Esri Community Maps Contributors, City of Aspen GIS, Pitkin County, © Exhibit H 143 Exhibit I.1 144 145 Exhibit I.2 146 147 148 149 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS 190 Leaves ORDINANCE NO. 4 SeE:Les o:E 19851 AN ORDINANCE ACCORDING TO SECTION 24-9.7 OF THE ASPEN RUNICIPAL CODE OF THE CITY OF ASPEN, COLORADO, FOR DESIGNATION OF HISTORIC STRUCTURES wflICH ARE LISTED IN THE INVENTORY OF HISTORIC SZTES AND STRUCTURES FOR THE CITY OF ASPEN, COLORADO WHER~%~S, the Historic Preservation Committee has recommended to the City Council that certain structures be designated as historic and a suffix of "Hu be attached to the zoning of these properties and the real estate records; and WHEREAS, these structures are listed in the 1980 Inventory of Historic Sites and Structures for the City of Aspen, Colorado; and WHEREAS, the owners of these properties have requested designation through written replies to the Planning Office; and WHEREAS, the Historic Preservation Committee has reviewed these sites and/or structures based on the guidelines and standards in Section 24-9.3 of the Aspen Municipal Code and found them to be worthy of historic designation.NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ASPEN, COLORADO: Section 1 That the following sites and/or structures at these addresses be granted historic designation and the suffixof "H" be attached to their zoning and real estate records:128 E. Main 126 E. Bteeker 123 E. Hallam Section 2 If any provision of this Ordinance or the application thereof to any person or circumstance is held invalid, such invalidity shall not affect other provisions or application of the Ordinance which can be given effect without the invalid provision or application, and to this end the provisions of this Ordinance are declared to be severable. Section 3 That a public hearing be held on this Ordinance on the ~-- day of ~/~t~', 1985, at5:00P.M., in the City Council Chambers,Aspen City Hall, Aspen, Colorado, fifteen (15) days prior to Exhibit I.3 150 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS 100 Leaves hearing notice of the same shall be published once within a newspaper of general circulation within the city. INTRODUCED, READ, AND O~ERED published as provided by law by the City Council of the City of Aspen, Colorado, at its regular meeting held at the City of Aspen on February 11, 1985. William L. Stirling, Mayor AT. ST: ity Clerk FINELY adopted, passed and approved this 25th day of March 1985. ATTEST ~ ' ' K~City Clerk 151 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS 100 Leaves STATE OF COLORADO CERTIFICATE COUNTY OF PITKIN I, Kathryn S. Koch, City Clerk of Aspen, Colorado, do hereby certify that the above and foregoing ordinance was introduced, read in full, and passed on first reading at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Aspen on ~ ~-~ // ,1985, and published in the Aspen Times, a weekly newspaper of general circulation published in the City of Aspen,Colorado, in its issue of /~,/~~ /~L 1985, and was finally adopted and approved at a regular meeting of the City Council on c~...~. ., 1985, and ordered published as Ordinance No. ,~ , Series of 1985, of said City as provided by law.IN WITNESS W~EREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and the seal of said City of Aspen, Colorado this __~2~_~ ..... day of 1985. Kathryn S. ~h, City Clerk SEAL Deputy City' ~le~rk 152 Exhibit I.4 153 RESOLUTION OF THE ASPEN HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION APPROVING AN APPLICATION FOR MINOR DEVELOPMENT LOCATED AT THE SARDY HOUSE, 128 EAST MAIN STREET, ALL OF LOTS P,Q,R,S, AND LOTS F,G,H,I, LESS THE NORTHERLY 75' THEREOF, AND THE VACATED ALLEY, BLOCK 66, CITY AND TOWNSITE OF ASPEN. RESOLUTION NO. 5, SERIES OF 2003 Parcel ID # 2737- 073-83-002 WHEREAS, the applicant, North/South Aspen LLC, has requested minor development approval for a setback variance to place an air conditioning unit at the rear of the property located at 128 East Main Street, all ofLotsP,Q,R,S, andLotsF,G,H,I, less the northerly 75' thereof, and the vacated alley, Block 66, City and Townsite of Aspen. The property is located in the Main Street Historic District; and WHEREAS, Section 26.415.070 of the Aspen Municipal Code states that no building or structure shall be erected, constructed, enlarged, altered, repaired, relocated or improved involving a designated historic property or district until plans or sufficient information have been submitted to the Community Development Director and approved in accordance with the procedures established for their review. An application for a building permit cannot be submitted without a Development Order; and WHEREAS, the procedure for a Minor Development Review is as follows. Staff reviews the submittal materials and prepares a report thatanalyzes the project's conformance with the design guidelines and other applicable Land Use Code Sections.This report is transmitted to the HPC with relevant information on the proposed project and a recommendation to continue, approve, disapprove or approve with conditions and the reasons for the recommendation. The HPC reviews the application, the staff analysis report and the evidence presented at the hearing to determine the project's conformance with the City of Aspen Historic Preservation Design Guidelines. The HPC may approve,disapprove, approve with conditions, or continue the application to obtain additional information necessary to make a decision to approve or deny; and WHEREAS, Katie Ertmer in her staff report dated March 12, 2003 performed an analysis of the application based on the standards, and recommended the application be approved with conditions; and WHEREAS, at a regular meeting held on March 12, 2003, the Historic Preservation Commission considered the application, found the application to meet the standards and granted approval with conditions by a vote of 5 to 0.THEREFORE, Exhibit I.5 154 That the HPC approves Minor Development for The Sardy House, 128 W. Main Street, City of Aspen, Colorado with the following conditions: 1. There shall be no deviations from the exterior elevations as approved without first being reviewed and approved by HPC staff and monitor. 2. This condition of approval will be required to be printed on the cover sheet of the building permit plan set and all other prints made for the purpose of construction. APPROVED BY THE COMMISSION at its regular meeting on the 12th day of March, 2003. Appr~,~Form: Davit~It0efer, Assistant Cl{ty Attorney Approved as to Content: HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION Kathy Strickland, Chief Deputy Clerk 155 Exhibit I.6 156 157 158 15 9 160 16 1 162 16 3 164 165 Exhibit I.7 166 Exhibit I.8 167 168 169 A B C D E F G H I K L M N O P Q R S BLOCK 6 6 BLOCK 5 8 BLOCK 7 3 BLOCK 6 5 AS P E N S T R E E T 75 . 3 ' R I G H T - O F - W A Y (P A V E D S U R F A C E ) N. G A R M I S C H S T . ( P R E V I O U S L Y C E N T E R S T . ) 10 1 ' R I G H T - O F - W A Y ( P A V E D S U R F A C E ) MAIN STREET100' RIGHT-OF-WAY (PAVED SURFACE) HALLAM STREET74.78' RIGHT-OF-WAY (PAVED SURFACE) 20.39' PLATTED ALLEY WIDTH N74° 11' 04"W 269.95' N1 5 ° 4 8 ' 5 6 " E 2 2 0 . 3 9 ' N1 5 ° 4 8 ' 5 6 " E 2 2 0 . 3 9 ' S74° 11' 04"E 269.95' N74° 11' 04"W 119.98' S1 5 ° 4 8 ' 5 6 " W 1 4 5 . 3 9 ' 14 5 . 3 9 ' 119.98' LOT 1 U.S. WEST SUBDIVISION PLAT BOOK 32 PAGE 11 LOT 2 U.S. WEST S U B D I V I S I O N P L A T BOOK 32 P A G E 1 1 SUBJECT PROPERTY 128 MAIN ST. 17,444 SQ. FT. +/- 0.400 AC. +/- REC.NO. 597782 ASPE N C L I N I C B U I L D I N G PLAT B O O K 6 0 P A G E 4 8 VIC T O R I A N S A T B L E E K E R PLA T B O O K 4 3 P A G E 1 6 BASIS OF BEARING AREA OF SUBJECT PROPERTY WHERE AN UNDETERMINED LOCATION FOR A POWER & SEWER EASEMENT BENEFITING MOUNTAIN STATES TELEPHONE & TELEGRAPH IS LOCATED, TITLE EXCEP. NO. 11 REC. NO. 110893 (BOOK 193 PAGE 89) PUBLIC UTILITY EASEMENT RESERVED FOR THE CITY OF ASPEN IN VACATED ALLEY, TITLE EXCEP. NO. 10 REC. NO. 111309 (BOOK 194 PAGE 7) FOUND NO. 5 REBAR WITH 2.5" ALUMINUM CAP L.S. 30113 POWERS ELEVATION CO. FOUND NO. 5 REBAR W/PLASTIC CAP L.S. 29030 FOUND NO. 5 REBAR W/PLASTIC CAP L.S. 9184 FOUND CITY BLOCK CORNER 1" IRON PIPE W/ALUMINUM CAP FOUND NO. 5 REBAR W/PLASTIC CAP L.S. 25947 FOUND NO. 5 REBAR W/ALUMINUM CAP 3' WITNESS CORNER L.S. 22580 FOUND NO. 5 REBAR W/ALUMINUM CAP BENT & ILLEGIBLE FOUND CITY BLOCK CORNER 1" IRON PIPE W/ALUMINUM CAP FOUND NO. 5 REBAR W/PLASTIC CAP ILLEGIBLE BEARS N77°56'W, 1.1' S4 4 ° 3 3 ' 2 7 " W 4 1 4 . 6 2 ' CIT OF ASPEN CONTROL MONUMENT GPS-6 INTERSECTION OF GARMISCH & HOPKINS SET NO. 5 REBAR W/PLASTIC CAP 1' WITNESS CORNER, L.S. 28643 75 . 0 0 ' 10 0 . 0 0 ' 20 . 3 9 ' 25 . 0 0 ' AREA AFFECTED BY ORDINANCE NO. 60 - 1976 TITLE EXCEP. NO. 12 (CROSS HATCHED AREA) PROJECT BENCHMARK ELEVATION = 7897.9' SET NO. 5 REBAR W/1.25" PLASTIC CAP 1' WITNESS CORNER L.S. 28643 SCALE: 1" = 2000' VICINITY MAP 1 inch = ft. ( IN FEET ) GRAPHIC SCALE 0 40 PROPERTY DESCRIPTION (PER TITLE COMMITMENT) LOTS F,G,H, AND I LESS THE NORTHERLY 75 FEET THEREOF, AND ALL OF LOTS P,Q,R, AND S AND THAT PART OF THE VACATED ALLEY BOUNDED BY THE EXTENSION OF THE EASTERLY LOT LINES OF LOTS I AND S AND THE WESTERLY LOT LINES OF LOTS F AND P, ALL IN BLOCK 66, CITY AND TOWNSITE OF ASPEN. COUNTY OF PITKIN, STATE OF COLORADO GRK 17179.02 2/15/2024 G:\2016\16069\SURVEY\Survey DWGs\ALTA\16069 ALTA BASE.dwg IMPROVEMENT SURVEY PLAT OF: SHEET 1 OF 2 SARDY HOUSE PROPERTY A PARCEL OF LAND SITUATED ON LOTS P, Q, R & S AND PORTIONS OF LOTS F, G, H, I, AND THE ALLEY OF BLOCK 66 CITY & TOWNSITE OF ASPEN, COUNTY OF PITKIN, STATE OF COLORADO SURVEY NOTES 1) DATE OF FIELD WORK: MARCH 29 - 31, APRIL 4 - 5, AND NOVEMBER 21 - 22, 2016. UPDATED MAY 15 AND 16, 2018 AND DECEMBER 16, 2019. UPDATED TRANSFORMER MEASUREMENTS FEBRUARY 26, 2020. TREES AT THE BACK OF THE HOUSE WERE LOCATED IN NOVEMBER OF 2016, WHILE ROOTS AND THE OUTLINE OF THE TREE DRIPLINES AT THE FRONT OF THE HOUSE WERE LOCATED IN MAY OF 2018. TREE SIZES ARE GOOD FOR THESE DATES. UPDATED MAY 15, 19 AND 25, 2022 AS TO UTILITIES AT GARAGE. UPDATED WITH UTILITY PEDESTALS AT GARAGE ON JANUARY 15, 2024. 2) DATE OF PREPARATION: MARCH - APRIL, AND NOVEMBER, 2016. UPDATED MAY, 2018; DECEMBER, 2019; JANUARY - FEBRUARY, 2020; FEBRUARY AND MAY, 2022 AND JANUARY - FEBRUARY, 2024. 3) BASIS OF BEARING: N38° 05' 44"W BETWEEN NGS STATION Q-159 AND NGS STATION S-159 PER THE CITY OF ASPEN GPS CONTROL MONUMENTATION MAP PREPARED BY MARCIN ENGINEERING. WHICH ESTABLISHED A PROJECT SPECIFIC BEARING OF N 74°11'04" BETWEEN THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF BLOCK 66, MONUMENTED BY A FOUND CITY OF ASPEN BLOCK CORNER (1" IRON PIPE WITH ALUMINUM CAP) AND THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF BLOCK 66, MONUMENTED BY A FOUND NO. 5 REBAR WITH PLASTIC CAP (L.S. 25947) . 4) THIS SURVEY DOES NOT CONSTITUTE A TITLE SEARCH BY SOPRIS ENGINEERING, LLC (SE) TO DETERMINE OWNERSHIP OR EASEMENTS OF RECORD. FOR ALL INFORMATION REGARDING EASEMENTS, RIGHTS OF WAY AND/OR TITLE OF RECORD, SE RELIED UPON THE ITEMS LISTED WITHIN THE SOURCE DOCUMENT TABLE CONTAINED HEREON AND THE TITLE COMMITMENT PREPARED BY LAND TITLE GUARANTEE COMPANY, ORDER NO. Q62016950, WITH AN EFFECTIVE DATE OF FEBRUARY 2, 2024. 5) NO UNDERGROUND UTILITY LOCATES WERE PERFORMED FOR THIS SURVEY, UTILITIES SHOWN ARE PER FIELD OBSERVED EVIDENCE. 6) THE ADDRESS OF THE SUBJECT PROPERTY IS 128 MAIN STREET, ASPEN, CO 81611. PITKIN COUNTY PARCEL NO. 273512438005. 7) ACCORDING TO THE FLOOD INSURANCE RATE MAP NUMBER 08097C0354E (AUGUST 15, 2019) THE SUBJECT PROPERTY IS WITHN ZONE X (AREA OF MINIMAL FLOOD HAZARD). 8) THE 1998 ALTA/ACSM SURVEY REFERENCED IN THE SOURCE DOCUMENT TABLE BELOW SHOWS THE FIELD MEASURED BEARINGS AND DISTANCES BETWEEN FOUND MONUMENTS FOR THE LIMITS OF THE SUBJECT PROPERTY BOUNDARY. THAT THESE MEASUREMENTS ARE IN CONFLICT WITH THE SOURCE DOCUMENT REFERENCED 1959 OFFICIAL PLAT OF THE CITY AND TOWNSITE OF ASPEN. THIS SURVEY LOCATED BLOCK CORNER MONUMENTS THAT VERIFIED THE 1959 RECORD DIMENSIONS OF THE LOTS AND ALLEYWAY THAT COMPRISE THE LIMITS OF THE SUBJECT PROPERTY. 9) BASIS OF ELEVATION: THE 1998 CITY OF ASPEN CONTROL DATUM, WHICH IS BASED ON AN ELEVATION OF 7720.88' (NAVD 1988) ON THE NGS STATION "S-159". THIS ESTABLISHED A SITE BENCHMARK ELEVATION OF 7897.9' ON A FOUND ALUMINUM CAP ON A 1" IRON PIPE (UNSTAMPED) MONUMENTING THE SOUTHEAST BLOCK CORNER AND PROPERTY CORNER OF THE SUBJECT PROPERTY. 10) SAID DESCRIBED PROPERTY IS NOT WITHIN THE MUD FLOW ZONES, ACCORDING TO THE 2014 CITY OF ASPEN URBAN RUNOFF MANAGEMENT PLAN (FIGURE 7.1A) AND OUTSIDE THE POTENTIAL GEOLOGICAL HAZARD ZONES, ACCORDING TO THE 2001 CITY OF ASPEN MASTER DRAINAGE PLAN (FIGURE ES-5). 11) APPROXIMATELY 8" OF SNOW ON SITE AT TIME OF LAST SURVEY UPDATE. SOPRIS ENGINEERING - LLC CIVIL CONSULTANTS 502 MAIN STREET, SUITE A3 CARBONDALE, COLORADO 81623 (970) 704-0311 SOPRISENG@SOPRISENG.COM SITE SOURCE DOCUMENTS: ·PLAT-CITY & TOWNSITE OF ASPEN MAP-GE BUCHANAN MAP-DECEMBER 16, 1959 (RECEPTION NO. 102025) ·MAP-CITY OF ASPEN GPS CONTROL MONUMENTATION REVISED JULY 13, 2010 ·PLAT-U.S. WEST SUBDIVISION (PLAT BK. 32-PG.18) ·PLAT-CONDOMINIUM MAP OF VICTORIANS AT BLEEKER (PLAT BK. 43-PG. 16) ·SURVEY-IMPROVEMENT SURVEY, EASTERLY 20 FEET LOT M, LOT N AND LOT O, BLOCK 66-ASPEN SURVEY ENGINEERS, INC. (SURVEY BK. 002-PG. 11) ·PLAT-ASPEN CLINIC BUILDING CONDOMINIUM (PLAT BK. 60-PG. 48) ·SURVEY-ALTA/ACSM LAND TITLE SURVEY-POWERS ELEVATION CO. INC., OCTOBER 23, 1998 (UNRECORDED, PROVIDED BY CLIENT) ALL OF THE PITKIN COUNTY, COLORADO RECORDS-UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED. CONTROL/TITLE DIAGRAM SURVEYOR'S CERTIFICATE I, GEOFFREY R. KELLER, HEREBY CERTIFY TO BTRSARDY, LLC, A LIMITED CALIFORNIA LIABILITY , THAT THIS IS AN “IMPROVEMENT SURVEY PLAT” AS DEFINED BY C.R.S. § 38-51-102(9), AND THAT IT IS A MONUMENTED LAND SURVEY SHOWING THE CURRENT LOCATION OF ALL STRUCTURES, WATER COURSES, WATER FEATURES AND/OR BODIES OF WATER, FLOOD PLAIN, ROADS, TRAILS, VISIBLE UTILITIES, FENCES, HEDGES, OR WALLS SITUATED ON THE DESCRIBED PARCEL AND WITHIN FIVE FEET OF ALL BOUNDARIES OF SUCH PARCEL, ANY CONFLICTING BOUNDARY EVIDENCE OR VISIBLE ENCROACHMENTS, AND ALL EASEMENTS AND RIGHTS OF WAY OF A PUBLIC OR PRIVATE NATURE THAT ARE VISIBLE, OR APPARENT, OR OF RECORD AND UNDERGROUND UTILITIES, DESCRIBED IN THE TITLE COMMITMENT PREPARED BY LAND TITLE GUARANTEE COMPANY, ORDER NO. Q62016950, AS SPECIFIED ON THE IMPROVEMENT SURVEY PLAT. THE ERROR OF CLOSURE FOR THIS SURVEY IS LESS THAN 1/15,000. ______________________________________ GEOFFREY R. KELLER L.S. #37997 Exhibit J 17 0 36"x60' 40"x60' 22"x45'28"x50'17"x40'17"x40' 75.9' 16 . 7 ' 17.9' 9. 3 ' 8.0' 24 . 9 ' 4.0' 15 . 2 ' 5.0' 2. 5 ' 4. 2 ' 10.2'4.2' 14 . 1 ' 3.7'4.2' 4. 3 ' 4. 3 ' 1.6' 9. 9 ' 2.2' 14 . 7 ' 1.4'1. 5 ' 20.2'5.8' 14 . 0 ' 5. 8 ' 15.1' 4. 3 ' 13 . 8 ' 4.4' 15.0' 19 . 9 ' 8.0' 19 . 5 ' 8.2' 19 . 5 ' 19 . 9 ' 18.0' 19 . 9 ' 18.0' ug ug ug ug ug ug ug ug ug ug ug u g w w w w w w w wwww 7.3"x14' 9.0"x18' 3-3.1"x12' 4-2.5"x10' 4-4.0"x13' 11.6"x23' 10.5"x21' 10.1"x20' 12.1"x24' 11.6"x23' 9.8"x20' 3-3.0"x12' 3-2.4"x9'11.2"x22' 11.2"x22' 14.1"x28' 3.4"x6' 3.0"x6' 2.9"x6' 3.6"x7' 2.5"x5' 2.7"x5' 8.7"x17' 4.7"x9' 3-2.6"x8' 4-3.2"x12' 4-2.5"x11' 4-3.7"x13' 3-3.1"x12' 4.7"x9'5.2"x10' 4.6"x9' 7.6"x15' 9.4"x20' 8.3"x16' 7.7"x15' 9.4"x19' 5.8"x11' 5.6"x11' 8.1"x16' 7.2"x14' 4-3.1"x11' 5.3"x10'8.8"x17' 10.0"x21' 3.2"x6'4.6"x9' 3-2.5"x6'3-2.3"x8' 10.5"x20' 2.6"x5'7.8"x16' wwwww uu uu THRESHOLD ELV=7900.0' 6.6"x15' FINISHED FLOOR ELV=7898.7' ss ss ss ss ss ss ss ss ss ss ss ss ss ss ss ss ss ss ss ss ss FINISHED FLOOR ELV=7898.7' FINISHED FLOOR ELV=7898.6' 7897 7897 78 9 9 7898 7 8 9 8 7898 7 8 9 8 7898 7898 7898 7898 7898 7897 7897 7897 7 8 9 7 7898 7897 7 8 9 7 ueueueue ue ueueue MULTI-STORY BRICK BUILDING 128 MAIN ST. MULTI-STORY BRICK BUILDING MULTI-STORY BRICK BUILDING U P P E R L E V E L W A L K W A Y M U L T I - S T O R Y B R I C K B U I L D I N G COVERED CAR PARK W/UPPER LEVEL BUILDING COVERED CAR PARK W/UPPER LEVEL BUILDING NEIGHBORING BUILDING NE I G H B O R I N G B U I L D I N G "TREX" DECK METAL STAIRCASE PLANTER TRENCH DRAIN WINDOW WELL FLAGSTONE SURFACE (TYP.) BRICK PAVED COURTYARD POOL RE T A I N I N G W A L L DECK CURB LINE (TYP.) CONCRETE SIDEWALK (TYP.) 5.3' 15.4' 5.7' 44.0'COLUMNN (TYP.) 5.4' 10.0' 25.1' 9.9' CONCRETE DRIVEWAY SEE SHEET 1 (TITLE EXCEPTION NO. 11) AS P E N S T R E E T 75 . 3 ' R I G H T - O F - W A Y (P A V E D S U R F A C E ) MAIN STREET100' RIGHT-OF-WAY (PAVED SURFACE) SUBJECT PROPERTY BOUNDARY (TYP.) CONCRETE SURFACE W/A.C. UNIT FOUND CITY BLOCK CORNER 1" IRON PIPE W/ALUMINUM CAP SET NO. 5 REBAR W/PLASTIC CAP 1' WITNESS CORNER, L.S. 28643 FOUND NO. 5 REBAR W/ALUMINUM CAP 3' WITNESS CORNER L.S. 22580 FLAGSTONE SURFACE (TYP.) SEE SHEET 1 (TITLE EXCEPTION NO. 10) LOT 1 LOT 2 SET NO. 5 REBAR W/1.25" PLASTIC CAP 1' WITNESS CORNER L.S. 28643 SNOWMELT HEATED CONC. PAD 19 . 9 ' ug ug ug ug ug ug ug ss ss ss ss ss ss ss ss ss ss ss ss ss ss ue ue ue ue ue ue ue ue ue ue ue ue ue ue ue ue ue ue ue ue ue ue ue ue COMCAST PED. UNKNOWN UTILITY PED. TRANSFORMER 4" ELECTRIC BOLLARD 1 inch = ft. ( IN FEET ) GRAPHIC SCALE 0 10 GRK 17179.02 2/15/2024 G:\2016\16069\SURVEY\Survey DWGs\ALTA\16069 ALTA BASE.dwg IMPROVEMENT SURVEY PLAT OF: SHEET 2 OF 2 SOPRIS ENGINEERING - LLC CIVIL CONSULTANTS 502 MAIN STREET, SUITE A3 CARBONDALE, COLORADO 81623 (970) 704-0311 SOPRISENG@SOPRISENG.COM GAS METER SEWER MANHOLE SEWER CLEANOUT ELECTRIC TRANSFORMER ELECTRIC METER/PEDESTAL TELEPHONE PEDESTAL CATV PEDESTAL EXISTING CONDITIONS LEGEND GROUND RECESSED LIGHT TELEPHONE MANHOLE CHAINLINK FENCE SARDY HOUSE PROPERTY A PARCEL OF LAND SITUATED ON LOTS P, Q, R & S AND PORTIONS OF LOTS F, G, H, I, AND THE ALLEY OF BLOCK 66 CITY & TOWNSITE OF ASPEN, COUNTY OF PITKIN, STATE OF COLORADO WOODEN FENCE ______________________________________ GEOFFREY R. KELLER L.S. #37997 UNDERGROUND ELECTRIC GAS LINE WATER LINE UNDERGROUND TELEPHONE DECIDUOUS TREE (# TREES TRUNK DIA." X DRIPLINE') LOCATED 2016-2018 CONIFEROUS TREE (# TREES TRUNK DIA." X DRIPLINE') LOCATED 2016-2018 SHRUB (SCALED TO DRIPLINE DIAMETER) LOCATED 2016-2018 ugug w w ue ue utut CURB STOP GENERAL UTILITY NOTES 1) THE LOCATIONS OF UNDERGROUND UTILITIES HAVE BEEN PLOTTED BASED ON UTILITY MAPS, CONSTRUCTION/DESIGN PLANS, OTHER INFORMATION PROVIDED BY UTILITY COMPANIES AND ACTUAL FIELD LOCATIONS IN SOME INSTANCES. THESE UTILITIES, AS SHOWN, MAY NOT REPRESENT ACTUAL FIELD CONDITIONS. IT IS THE RESPONSIBILITY OF THE CONTRACTOR TO CONTACT ALL UTILITY COMPANIES FOR FIELD LOCATION OF UTILITIES PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION. 2) THE LOCATION OF THE SEWER LINE IS BASED ON A MAP PROVIDED BY THE ASPEN SANITATION DISTRICT, DATED APRIL, 2016. 3) THE CITY OF ASPEN WATER DEPARTMENT WAS UNABLE TO LOCATE ANY WATER LINE WITHIN THE PROPERTY. SEWER LINEssss UNDERGROUND CABLEucuc UNDERGROUND UTILITYuuuu SEE DETAIL, LOWER RIGHT SCALE: 1" = 5' DETAIL 17 1 2 2 2 C h a p e l P l a c e , U n i t A C -201 P . O . B o x 9 6 5 0 A v o n , C O 8 1 620 P 9 7 0 . 9 4 9 . 6 1 0 8 www.bgbuildingworks.com April 26, 2024 Jamie L Brewster McLeod Brewster McLeod Architects 112 South Mill Street Unit B Aspen, CO 81611 RE: Sardy House, Aspen, CO Chiller Replacement Dear Jamie, As the Engineer-of-Record, BG was requested to provide a letter regarding the options for an in-kind replacement for the existing chiller located at the Sardy House as well as how they compare to the current City of Aspen zoning requirements and equipment that was approved in the 2003 HPC resolution. The three areas we looked at were: 1) Equal to or less than the height of the existing chiller, 2) maintain the equipment within the footprint of the existing concrete pad, and 3) reduce the noise level at the property line. The existing chiller was installed in 2003 and reached the end of its useful life in 2021; replacement parts have become extremely difficult to find and the refrigerant is obsolete. In order for the Sardy House to have cooling restored, the existing chiller must be replaced. Since the installation of the existing chiller, the City of Aspen has enacted more stringent requirements pertaining to equipment placed within the setback. The current City of Aspen requirements indicate mechanical equipment located within setbacks to be no taller than 30” above grade and no more than 30” below grade (60” total) and be no louder than 60 dB during the day and 55 dB at night measured at the property line. Cooling equipment requires airflow to cool the equipment’s internal coils. When adequate airflow cannot be achieved the equipment not only cannot produce cooling, it puts the equipment in danger of failing. Mechanical equipment must also be periodically accessed to be maintained and repaired. With equipment lowered into the ground the equipment becomes inaccessible. With these limitations manufacturers are extremely hesitant to place their equipment in “recessed” pits and will not provide a warranty for the equipment. The equipment must be placed at grade in order to properly perform and be maintained. The chiller options we are proposing will be similar in height to the existing chiller and will be more efficient. Since the installation of the existing chiller, chillers have evolved in several ways. The existing chiller utilized R-22 refrigerant which is now obsolete and new chillers utilize R -410A. Different refrigerants utilize the refrigeration process in slightly different methods (different refrigerant line sizes, compressor sizes, fan sizes, etc.) so it makes finding replacement equipment extremely difficult. Also, over the last 20 years the endeavor for improved efficiency has been on the rise. In order for equipment to be more efficient oftentimes it means that it must be larger to have more surface area for heat transfer which also increases the noise produced by the equipment. The chiller options we are proposing are more efficient than the existing obsolete chiller and would be a big improvement to the overall system operating efficiency. Commercial chillers are inherently louder than residential condensing units but based on the size and configuration of the existing system, residential condensing units are not an option. Exhibit K 172 Jamie L Brewster McLeod Brewster McLeod Architects 9853.00 Sardy House April 26, 2024 Page - 2 – www.bgbuildingworks.com BG Buildingworks made an exhaustive effort to find in -kind replacement equipment that meet the existing system requirements, increase efficiency, and comply more closely with the City of Aspen regulations for equipment placed in a setback and as such proposes replacing the existing unit with two Samsung Modular Chillers. These units an improvement in efficiency and sound ratings over the existing chiller. The footprint of the proposed units do vary from existing. The sound mitigation options are available stock on the Samsung AG010 Modular Chillers. These chillers utilize VRF technology to modulate as needed to reduce sound levels as well as offer a night setback option which caps the db at user specified level. The chillers are 66” tall. The manufacturer recommends placing snow/ hail guards on the top and sides of the unit to protect the inner coils, the guards are 28” tall and 22” wide. The manufacture also recommends placing the unit on an 8” stand for proper housekeeping and to keep the unit away from debris (leaves, snow, and dirt). These units require an external buffer tank to be located to the west of the existing concrete pad. The table below reviews these configurations size and sound level impacts. The attached documents include specifications, equipment layout and dimensions. In addition to the proposed guards and stands it would be beneficial for the roof above the chillers to have a snow fence installed to prevent falling ice/ snow chunks on the units. Existing Chiller (Has No Stand as Internal parts are elevated) (2) Samsung AG010 Modular Chillers (2) Samsung AG010 Modular Chillers w/ Recommended Wind/ Hail Guards and 8” Stand Size W: 43” H: 64-1/4” L: 142-1/2” Total Footprint: 43” x 142-1/2” W: 32” H: 70-3/4” - 4” Pad + 66-3/4” Unit L: 157-1/2” - 70-3/4” Unit + 16” Clearance + 70-3/4” Unit Total Chiller Footprint: 32” x 157- 1/2” W: 32” H: 102-3/4” * - 4” Pad + 8” stand + 90-3/4” Unit/ hood combo L: 194-1/2” - 18-1/2” Guard + 70-3/4” Unit + 16” Clearance + 70- 3/4” Unit + 18-1/2” Total Chiller Footprint: 32” x 194- 1/2” dB Peak 83-87 60 db 54 db w/ NIGHT LVL 2 Mode No Change City of Aspen dB regulations: 60 dB during the day, 55 dB at night, measured at the property line *The chiller fan on top of the unit has a fan guard on top of the unit which will sit inside of the hood. This results in a slightly shorter unit/hood combo height than the two component’s heights added separately. Horizontal Buffer Tank Size W: 24” H: 32” - 4” Pad + 28” Tank w/ saddle L: 60” Pad 36”x 60” dB Peak None Based on an extensive review of the existing system and the City of Aspen regulations for equipment located in the setback, it is the opinion of BG Buildingworks that the proposed chillers are the best option for restoring cooling to the Sardy House as it is the least intrusive to the surrounding environment, increases efficiency of 173 Jamie L Brewster McLeod Brewster McLeod Architects 9853.00 Sardy House April 26, 2024 Page - 3 – www.bgbuildingworks.com the equipment, reduces the noise as measured at the property line and is overall the best product for in -kind replacement. Sincerely, Peter B. Morabito, PE Project Manager Cc: Bill Larson; Brent Schumacher 174 PRESSURE REDUCING VALVE FLOW SWITCH SHOCK ABSORBER HOSE BIBB STRAINER W/ BLOW-OFF VALVE ROOF DRAIN SAFETY RELIEF VALVE FLOOR DRAIN FLOOR SINK HORIZONTAL CLEANOUT VACUUM BREAKER VERTICAL CLEANOUT PRESSURE GAUGE W/ PIG TAIL & COCK THERMOMETER PRESSURE - TEMP. TAP AIR VENT PIPE ANCHOR FLEXIBLE CONNECTOR PIPE EXPANSION JOINT PIPE UNION DOUBLE CHECK BACKFLOW PREVENTER PUMP & EQUIPMENT CONNECTOR WALL HYDRANT TEMPERATURE CONTROL VALVE (2-WAY) DRAIN VALVE W/ HOSE END PLUG VALVE IN RISER FLOW BALANCING VALVE GATE OR GLOBE VALVE IN RISER FLOW CONTROL VALVE BALL VALVE PLUG OR BALANCING VALVE CHECK VALVE GLOBE VALVE BUTTERFLY VALVE VENTURI/FLOW INDICATOR TEMPERATURE CONTROL VALVE (3-WAY) SOLENOID VALVE TEMPERATURE CONTROLLER OR SENSOR 90° ELBOW UP TEE UP TEE DOWN DECK/ROOF DRAIN ABOVE SHUT OFF (BALL, GATE, BUTTERFLY) STEAM TRAP TEST CHAMBER PIPING SYMBOLS 90° ELBOW DN H B W H FS S STEAM TRAP: FT-FLOAT & THERMOSTATIC TD-THERMODYNAMIC IB-INVERTED BUCKET TS-THERMOSTATIC BP-BALANCED PRESSURE TC 1.CHILLER AND ASSOCIATED PIPING, EQUIPMENT, & APPURTENANCES SHOWN ON THIS SHEET ARE TO BE LOCATED IN EXISTING OUTDOOR CHILLER LOCATION. 2.ALL PIPING SHOWN IN LIGHT LINE WEIGHT ON THIS SHEET IS ASSUMED TO BE EXISTING. HOWEVER, IT SHALL BE AT THE CONTRACTOR'S DISCRETION TO REUSE EXISTING PIPING WHEN AND WHERE FEASIBLE. 3.THE NEW CHILLER PLANT SHALL CONSIST OF (2) NEW 10 TON AIR COOLED CHILLER WITH EXTERNAL BUFFER TANK , LOW AMBIENT CAPABILITY, AND NIGHT LIMITED NOISE FUNCTION. 4.IT IS ASSUMED THE EXISTING GLYCOL FEEDER, EXISTING BUFFER TANK, AND EXISTING PUMPS WILL BE REPLACED. 5.CONTRACTOR TO CONFIRM EXISTING ELECTRICAL INFRASTRUCTURE AT CHILLER CAN ACCOMMODATE NEW EQUIPMENT. CHILLER SYSTEM NOTES: CHILLER SEQUENCE OF CONTROL: 1.CH-1, CHILLERS; P-X, ASSOCIATED CHILLER INJECTION PUMP; P-Y, CHILLED WATER CIRCULATION PUMPS a.ENABLE CHILLER AND ASSOCIATED PUMPS UPON A CALL FOR COOLING FROM SIGNAL FROM THE BUFFER TANK MOUNTED AQUASTAT INDICATING CHILLED WATER TEMPERATURE ABOVE AN ADJUSTABLE SETPOINT OF 42°F. DISABLE CHILLER AND ASSOCIATED PUMPS WHEN A CALL FOR COOLING IS NO LONGER PRESENT. PUMP SCHEDULE MARK SERVICE TYPE GPM TDH (FT)FLUID MOTOR MANUFACTURER* MODEL #ACCESSORIES / REMARKS WATTS (HP)VOLT/ PH P-X CHILLED WATER INJECTION INLINE 24 56 50% PROP. GLYCOL 1700 208/3 GRUNDFOS UPS 50-240F QUANTITY: 2 (ONE PUMP PER CHILLER) P-Y CHILLED WATER CIRC INLINE 50 PROVIDE TEST AND BALANCE TO CONFIRM EXISTING PUMP FLOW AND HEAD 50% PROP. GLYCOL -120/1 -QUANTITY: 2 (SIZED FOR HALF OF REQUIRED FLOW AND ALL OF REQUIRED HEAD) MANUFACTURERS: *TRANE, MCQUAY, MODINE EQUIVALENT MISCELLANEOUS MECHANICAL EQUIPMENT SCHEDULE MARK SERVICE TYPE CAPACITY ELECTRICAL MANUFACTURER* & MODEL #ACCESSORIES REMARKSVOLT/ PH AS-1 CHILLED WATER SYSTEM AIR SEPARATOR INLINE ---SPIROVENT VSR200FA 2"-REPLACE EXISTING AIR SEPARATOR BT-1 CHILLED WATER BUFFER TANK 4-PIPE 120 GALLONS -- ELBI TANK MFG CUSTOM HORIZONTAL TANK ET-1 CHILLED WATER EXPANSION TANK FIXED DIAPHRAM FIELD VERIFY EXISTING EXPANSION TANK SIZE AND REPLACE WITH EQUIVALENT. --TACO CX -REPLACE EXISTING EXPANSION TANK ABOVE SEA LEVEL PROJECT ALTITUDE 7,932' GENERAL MECHANICAL NOTES: 1.DO NOT SCALE DRAWINGS. VERIFY DIMENSIONS IN FIELD PRIOR TO COMMENCEMENT OF WORK. REFER TO ARCHITECTURAL DRAWINGS FOR ALL DIMENSIONS. 2.IT SHALL BE ASSUMED THAT ALL SUBCONTRACTORS ARE EXPERIENCED AND THOROUGHLY KNOWLEDGEABLE IN THEIR RESPECTIVE AREAS OF THE CONSTRUCTION INDUSTRY AND SHALL PERFORM IN A RESPONSIBLE MANNER IN ESTABLISHED CONSTRUCTION SEQUENCE, RECOGNIZING THE PRIORITY OF THE CONSTRUCTION DOCUMENTS, DRAWING, AND DETAILS, AND SHALL INFORM THE PRIME CONTRACTOR OF POTENTIAL PROBLEMS WHEN DRAWINGS ARE UNCLEAR OR INCONSISTENT. 3.SUBCONTRACTORS SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE TO NOTIFY THE PRIME CONTRACTOR OF DISCREPANCIES OR CONFLICTS ON THESE CONSTRUCTION DOCUMENTS FOUND DURING BIDDING AND/OR CONSTRUCTION PRIOR TO PERFORMING THE WORK. SUCH DISCREPANCIES SHALL BE RECEIVED EXPEDITIOUSLY AND NOTIFICATION GIVEN TO THE SUBCONTRACTOR EITHER VERBALLY OR IN WRITING AS APPLICABLE TO THE CONDITION. 4.IF NOT SPECIFICALLY DEFINED IN THESE CONSTRUCTION DOCUMENTS, MATERIALS AND/OR EQUIPMENT SHALL BE IDENTIFIED BY THE SUBCONTRACTOR WITHIN A REASONABLE TIME TO ALLOW SELECTION, PURCHASE, AND DELIVERY SO AS TO PREVENT DELAY ON THE JOB SCHEDULE. 5.OFFSET PIPING, DUCTWORK, ETC. AS NECESSARY TO ACCOMMODATE STRUCTURE, BEAMS, COLUMNS, AND EXISTING EQUIPMENT. 6.WORK SHALL BE PERFORMED IN A WORKMANLIKE MANNER TO THE SATISFACTION OF THE ARCHITECT. 7.IT IS THE CONTRACTOR'S RESPONSIBILITY TO PERFORM HIS/HER WORK IN CONFORMANCE WITH ALL APPLICABLE CODES, ORDINANCES AND LIFE SAFETY FEATURES AS REQUIRED BY LOCAL, STATE, OR NATIONAL AUTHORITIES. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL VERIFY WITH THE ARCHITECT IF MODIFICATION OF HIS/HER WORK IS REQUIRED FOR COMPLIANCE. 8.ALL WORK OF ALL TRADES MUST BE IN STRICT COMPLIANCE, OR EXCEED THE MINIMUM MATERIAL AND METHOD REQUIREMENTS OF THE 2012 INTERNATIONAL BUILDING, MECHANICAL, PLUMBING, FIRE AND 2011 NATIONAL ELECTRICAL CODES, NFPA, AND ALL LOCAL ORDINANCES AND AMENDMENTS AND MANUFACTURER'S INSTALLATION RECOMMENDATIONS. IF A CONFLICT BETWEEN THOSE PUBLICATIONS EXIST, THE MOST STRINGENT REQUIREMENT SHALL APPLY. 9.PAY FOR AND SECURE ALL REQUIRED PERMITS AND INSPECTIONS. PRIOR TO FINAL PAYMENT, TURN OVER TO ARCHITECT ALL CERTIFICATES OF COMPLETION. 10.GUARANTEE THE INSTALLATION AGAINST DEFECTS IN MATERIALS AND LABOR WHICH MAY OCCUR UNDER NORMAL USAGE. THE GUARANTY SHALL BE FOR A PERIOD OF ONE YEAR AFTER OWNER'S ACCEPTANCE. DEFECTS SHALL BE PROMPTLY REMEDIED WITHOUT COST TO THE OWNER. 11.PROVIDE RECORD DRAWINGS TO ARCHITECT. DRAWINGS SHALL INCLUDE ALL ADDENDUM ITEMS, CHANGE ORDERS, ALTERATIONS, REROUTINGS, ETC. 12.SYSTEMS SHALL BE COMPLETE, OPERABLE, AND READY FOR CONTINUOUS OPERATION PRIOR TO ACCEPTANCE BY THE OWNER. 13.SYSTEMS SHALL BE TESTED FOR PROPER OPERATION. PERFORM, AT A MINIMUM, ALL CODE REQUIRED TESTS OR SYSTEMS. IF TESTS OF WORK ARE DEFECTIVE, CONTRACTOR SHALL MAKE CORRECTIONS NECESSARY AT NO ADDITIONAL COST TO OWNER. 14.PROVIDE A BASE BID WHICH SHALL INCLUDE ONLY SPECIFIED EQUIPMENT OR EQUIPMENT LISTED AS EQUIVALENT. NO SUBSTITUTIONS FOR THE LISTED EQUIPMENT SHALL BE ALLOWED IN THE BASE BID. 14.1.THE MANUFACTURER OF EQUIPMENT OR MATERIALS FIRST NAMED ON THE DRAWINGS IS THE BASIS OF DESIGN. OTHER MANUFACTURERS LISTED ARE CONSIDERED GENERAL EQUIVALENTS ONLY. 14.2.COORDINATION OF GENERAL EQUIVALENTS AND SUBSTITUTIONS: WHERE CONTRACT DOCUMENTS PERMIT SELECTION FROM SEVERAL GENERAL EQUIVALENTS, OR WHERE SUBSTITUTIONS ARE AUTHORIZED, COORDINATE CLEARANCE AND OTHER INTERFACE REQUIREMENTS WITH MECHANICAL AND OTHER WORK. 14.3.PROVIDE NECESSARY ADDITIONAL ITEMS SO THAT SELECTED OR SUBSTITUTED ITEM OPERATES EQUIVALENT TO THE BASIS OF DESIGN AND PROPERLY FITS IN THE AVAILABLE SPACE ALLOCATED FOR THE BASIS OF DESIGN. 14.4.PROVIDE ALL FEATURES WHICH ARE STANDARD ON THE BASIS OF DESIGN PLUS ANY SPECIFIED OPTIONS. 14.5.BE RESPONSIBLE FOR ASSURING THAT PIPING, CONDUIT, DUCT, FLUE, AND OTHER SERVICE LOCATIONS FOR GENERAL EQUIVALENTS OR SUBSTITUTIONS DO NOT CAUSE ACCESS, SERVICE, OR OPERATIONAL DIFFICULTIES ANY GREATER THAT WOULD BE ENCOUNTERED WITH THE BASE DESIGN. 15.ALL MATERIALS AND/OR EQUIPMENT SHALL BE HANDLED AND INSTALLED AS PER MANUFACTURER'S SPECIFICATIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS. 16.SUBMIT ENTIRE SUBMITTAL DATA AT ONE TIME. SUBMITTAL TO BE PDF, INDEXED IN A NEAT AND ORDERLY MANNER. PARTIAL SUBMITTALS WILL NOT BE ACCEPTED. SUBMITTALS SHALL INCLUDE, BUT NOT BE LIMITED TO: BOILERS, INSULATION, PUMPS, PIPING, VALVES, FLUE PIPING, COMBUSTION AIR PIPING, AND CONTROLS. 17.FAILURE TO ORDER, OR RELEASE ORDER FOR MATERIALS AND/OR EQUIPMENT WILL NOT BE ACCEPTED AS A REASON TO SUBSTITUTE ALTERNATE MATERIALS, EQUIPMENT, OR INSTALLATION METHODS. 18.REPAIR ALL ACCIDENTAL OR INTENTIONAL DAMAGE TO MATCH EXISTING CONSTRUCTION WITH NO NOTICEABLE DIFFERENCE IN CONTINUITY, APPEARANCE OR FUNCTION. 19.PROVIDE 4" HIGH CONCRETE EQUIPMENT PADS BENEATH FLOOR MOUNTED MECHANICAL EQUIPMENT, IN ADDITION TO ANY BASE ASSEMBLIES REQUIRED BY MANUFACTURER. 20.COORDINATE ARCHITECTURAL, STRUCTURAL, MECHANICAL, ELECTRICAL, LANDSCAPING, AND INTERIOR DESIGN DRAWINGS PRIOR TO INSTALLATION. NOTIFY ARCHITECT OF ANY CONFLICTS PRIOR TO BID & INSTALLATION. 21.CAREFULLY VERIFY ELECTRICAL SERVICE VOLTAGE AND PHASE AVAILABLE. 22.SUBMIT A WRITTEN BALANCE REPORT BY A NEBB OR AABC CERTIFIED BALANCING CONTRACTOR. BALANCING PROCEDURES SHALL BE IN ACCORDANCE WITH NEBB OR AABC GUIDELINES FOR PROPORTIONAL BALANCE. SUBMIT REPORT ON STANDARD NEBB FORMS OR SUBMIT FORMS FOR REVIEW PRIOR TO BALANCING. MEASUREMENTS SHALL INCLUDE ALL MOTOR AMPERAGE AND VOLTAGE READINGS; WATER FLOW AT ALL FLOW MEASUREMENT STATIONS; INLET AND OUTLET PRESSURE AT PUMPS WITH FLOW CALCULATED FROM THE PUMP CURVE; WATER FLOW, TEMPERATURE DROP, AND PRESSURE DROP AT ALL HEAT EXCHAGERS. 22.1.PROVIDE PRELIMINARY TESTING OF EXISTING HYDRONIC SYSTEMS. MEASURE CURRENT FLUID FLOW RATE AND PRESSURE DROP THROUGH ALL EXISTING CHILLED WATER PUMPS FOR THE CURRENTLY INSTALLED SYSTEMS. SUBMIT REPORT OF MEASURED VALUES TO ENGINEER FOR REVIEW AND CONFIRMATION OF SYSTEM DESIGN ASSUMPTIONS PRIOR TO DEMOLITION AND ORDERING OF NEW EQUIPMENT. 22.2.ADJUST FLOWS TO WITHIN 10% OF REQUIRED QUANTITY. IF ACTUAL QUANTITY IS LESS THAN 90%, INVESTIGATE CAUSE, ATTEMPT TO RECTIFY AND NOTIFY ENGINEER. SUBMITTAL OF BALANCE REPORT WITH LESS THAN REQUIRED FLOWS WITHOUT EXPLANATION IS CAUSE FOR REJECTION OF REPORT. 22.3.SUBMIT COPIES OF ALL SUBMITTALS IN ADDITION TO ANY REQUIRED BY THE CONTRACTOR AND HIS SUPPLIERS. THESE COPIES SHALL BE RETAINED BY THE OWNER, ARCHITECT, AND ENGINEER. 23.SUPPORT PIPE WITH ROD AND CLEVIS, RING HANGERS, TRAPEZE, OR CLAMPS. NO PIPE TAPE ALLOWED. ALL HANGERS SHALL BE SIZED FOR OD OF INSULATION, IF ANY. PROTECT INSULATED LINES WITH 20 GA SHEET METAL SHIELDS FOR PIPING 1-1/2" AND LESS. PROVIDE CALCIUM SILICATE INSULATION INSERTS FOR ALL INSULATED PIPING 2" AND LARGER. MAINTAIN VAPOR BARRIER ON ALL COLD LINES. ISOLATE BARE COPPER LINES FROM HANGERS WITH VIBRASORB OR EQUIVALENT, COPPER COATED HANGERS ARE NOT SUFFICIENT, WRAPPING PIPE WITH TAPE NOT ACCEPTABLE. 23.1.PLUMBING AND PIPING MATERIALS SHALL BE CONSISTENT WITH, OR OF HIGHER QUALITY, THAN THE EXISTING SYSTEMS. 24.INSULATE ALL CHILLED WATER WITH MINERAL FIBER INSULATION. 24.1.INSULATION THICKNESS: 24.1.1.CHILLED WATER, PER CURRENT IECC" 25.EQUIPMENT LABELS: LABEL ALL NEW PIPING AND EQUIPMENT. PROVIDE FULL BAND OR STRIP TYPE MARKERS AND FLOW ARROWS ON PIPING. PROVIDE ENGRAVED PLASTIC VALVE TAGS WITH VALVE NUMBER AND ATTACH WITH STANDARD CHAIN OR S-HOOKS. PROVIDE ENGRAVED PLASTIC SIGN ON OR NEAR SPECIFIED EQUIPMENT. DEMOLITION NOTES: 26.FIELD VERIFY ALL COMPONENTS PRIOR TO DEMOLITION. THE INFORMATION ON THIS SHEET WAS OBTAINED, IN PART, FROM HISTORIC DESIGN DRAWINGS. ONLY PORTIONS OF THE SYSTEMS WERE ACCESSIBLE FOR VISUAL CONFIRMATION DURING DESIGN PROCESS. 27.TEMPORARILY SEAL OR CAP PIPING TO BE RE-USED FOR LATER CONNECTION. 28.NOTIFY ENGINEER IMMEDIATELY OF ANY DISCREPANCIES OF INFORMATION REPRESENTED IN THE DOCUMENTS VERSUS WHAT IS FOUND IN THE FIELD. 29.COORDINATE PATCHING AND REPAIRS OF WALLS, CEILINGS AND FLOORS WITH ARCHITECT. NEW TO EXISTING CONNECTION POINT. AIR COOLED CHILLER SCHEDULE MARK TYPE SOUND (DB) DUTY CAPACITY (TONS) AMBIENT TEMP. DB (°F) L.W.T. (°F) E.W.T. (°F)GPM HEAD LOSS (FT.) ELECTRICAL MANUFACTURER* & MODEL #ACCESSORIES REMARKS MCA VOLT/ PH MOCP CH-1 TWO MODULE OUTDOOR AIR COOLED 60 DAY/ 54 NIGHT 18 93 42 42 48 (24 PER)44 52 (Per)208/3 70 (PER)SAMSUNG AG010KSVAFH/AA A,B,C,D,E,F MANUFACTURERS: *PRE APPROVED ONLY. GENERAL NOTES: A:CHILLED WATER FLUID CONTAINS 50% PROPYLENE GLYCOL. B:COORDINATE REQUIRED CONTROL OPTIONS WITH CONTROLS CONTRACTOR TO INTEGRATE WITH BAS AND TO BE VIEWED REMOTELY FOR TROUBLESHOOTING PURPOSES. C:PROVIDE WITH CUSTOM VIBRATION ISOLATION INERTIA BASE COORDINATED WITH STRUCTURAL. D:PROVIDE WITH FACTORY START-UP BY CERTIFIED TECHNICIAN WITH INTEGRAL KNOWLEDGE OF THE EQUIPMENT. E:PROVIDE WITH SIDE AND TOP SNOW/ HAIL GUARDS. REFERENCE PLAN PAGES FOR ADDITIONAL DETAILS. F:UTILIZE QUIET FUNCTION LEVEL 2 FOR NIGHT DB REQUIREMENTS. FC 19 FC 18 FC 17 FC 7 FC 6 FC 8 FC 10 FC 11 FC 4 FC 2 FC 3 FC 1 0.8 CHW 1.1 CHW 1.3 CHW 2.0 CHW1.4 CHW0.9 CHW2.3 CHW3.5 CHW 2.5 CHW 2.0 CHW 1.5 CHW - CHW 3/4" CHS&R 1 1/4" CHS&R 1" CHS&R 3/4" CHS&R 1 1/4" CHS&R IN BRIDGE MAIN BUILDING ANNEX FC 20 FC 21 FC 22 1.1 CHW1.1 CHW1.3 CHW FC 12 FC 13 FC 14 1.1 CHW1.3 CHW1.3 CHW FC 23 FC 24 1.1 CHW 1.2 CHW FC 15 FC 16 1.2 CHW 1.4 CHW FC 9 FC 5 1.4 CHW 1.2 CHW CH 1 CHILLER 3/4" CHS&R 2" CHS&R SCALE: CHILLED WATER PIPING DIAGRAM NO SCALE RE: CHILLER PIPING DIAGRAM ON EXISTING AND PROPOSED SHEETS SA R D Y H O U S E 12 8 E a s t M a i n S t r e e t As p e n , C O COPYRIGHT 2023C SCALE DRAWN BY / CHECKED BY DATE AS NOTED AL B U Q U E R Q U E | AV O N | DE N V E R | FO R T C O L L I N S 30 3 . 2 7 8 . 3 8 2 0 ww w ˛bg b u i l d i n g w o r k s ˛co m Pr o j e c t N o . 9 8 5 3 . 0 0 Co p y r i g h t 2 0 1 7 S: \ B G P R O J E C T S \ 9 8 5 3 . 0 0 S A R D Y H O U S E R E N O V A T I O N \ D R A W I N G S \ C H I L L E R U P G R A D E \ P E R M I T S E T M U L T I S T A C K \ 9 8 5 3 0 0 _ M 1 . 0 0 C O V E R . D W G PROGRESS SET 02/29/24 M1.00 MECHANICAL COVER SHEET PBM/BPL 17 5 CH-1 SCALE:1 EXISTING MECHANICAL FIRST FLOOR 3/16" = 1'-0" 1.RE: M1.00 FOR MECHANICAL DIAGRAMS. 2.PIPING ON EXTERIOR WALLS, PRE-CAST CONCRETE WALLS, IMMEDIATELY BELOW ROOFS, OR WITHIN CANTILEVERED FLOORS FULLY ON INTERIOR/WARM SIDE OF INSULATION. PROVIDE FURRED/FRAMED SPACE AS REQUIRED. 3.PROTECT PIPING ROUTED ALONG COLUMNS, WALLS, ETC. FROM DAMAGE AS NECESSARY WITH CAGES. COORDINATE WITH ARCHITECT. 4.ALL BRANCH CHILLED AND HEATING WATER PIPING TO FAN COIL UNITS SHALL BE 3/4" U.N.O. 5.ALL VALVES SHALL BE INSTALLED ABOVE DROP-IN CEILINGS IN ACCESSIBLE LOCATIONS, OR WITH ACCESS PANELS IN HARD-LID CEILINGS. 6.CONDENSATE LINES - MUST STAND OFF OF THE WALL NO LESS THAN ONE HALF OF AN INCH TO FACILITATE CLEANING OR BE SEALED TO THE WALL. MECHANICAL NOTES: 5. 7 ' 5. 3 ' 5. 4 ' 11'-11" 3' - 7 " 14'-10" 5' PROPERTY LINE 1' - 5 " FIELD VERIFY (E) ELECTRICAL DISCONNECT AND REPLACE IF NECESSARY FOR NEW CHILLER. AUTO AIR VENT AMTROL EXTROL MODEL 30 1/2" FLOW SWITCH BALANCING VALVE SUPPLY TO BUILDING RETURN FROM BUILDING 2" CHILLER COMPRESSORS (3). CHILLER/SYSTEM PUMPS. ARMSTRONG 35E422 (2 H.P.) INSTALLED CHILLER PIPING DIAGRAM PUMPS AND COMPRESSORS INSTALLED BELOW CHILLER UNIT. CHILLER: CONTINENTAL FSAC-24EPPK DEMO (E) CHILLER TO BE REPLACED WITH (N) CHILLER. SA R D Y H O U S E 12 8 E a s t M a i n S t r e e t As p e n , C O COPYRIGHT 2023C SCALE DRAWN BY / CHECKED BY DATE AS NOTED AL B U Q U E R Q U E | AV O N | DE N V E R | FO R T C O L L I N S 30 3 . 2 7 8 . 3 8 2 0 ww w ˛bg b u i l d i n g w o r k s ˛co m Pr o j e c t N o . 9 8 5 3 . 0 0 Co p y r i g h t 2 0 1 7 S: \ B G P R O J E C T S \ 9 8 5 3 . 0 0 S A R D Y H O U S E R E N O V A T I O N \ D R A W I N G S \ C H I L L E R U P G R A D E \ P E R M I T S E T M U L T I S T A C K \ 9 8 5 3 0 0 _ M 2 . 0 1 . D W G PROGRESS SET 02/29/24 FIRST FLOOR MECHANICAL PLAN M2.01 PBM/BPL 17 6 5' - 7 " 14'-10" 5' PROPERTY LINE 1.RE: M1.00 FOR MECHANICAL DIAGRAMS. 2.PIPING ON EXTERIOR WALLS, PRE-CAST CONCRETE WALLS, IMMEDIATELY BELOW ROOFS, OR WITHIN CANTILEVERED FLOORS FULLY ON INTERIOR/WARM SIDE OF INSULATION. PROVIDE FURRED/FRAMED SPACE AS REQUIRED. 3.PROTECT PIPING ROUTED ALONG COLUMNS, WALLS, ETC. FROM DAMAGE AS NECESSARY WITH CAGES. COORDINATE WITH ARCHITECT. 4.ALL BRANCH CHILLED AND HEATING WATER PIPING TO FAN COIL UNITS SHALL BE 3/4" U.N.O. 5.ALL VALVES SHALL BE INSTALLED ABOVE DROP-IN CEILINGS IN ACCESSIBLE LOCATIONS, OR WITH ACCESS PANELS IN HARD-LID CEILINGS. 6.CONDENSATE LINES - MUST STAND OFF OF THE WALL NO LESS THAN ONE HALF OF AN INCH TO FACILITATE CLEANING OR BE SEALED TO THE WALL. MECHANICAL NOTES: FIELD VERIFY (E) ELECTRICAL DISCONNECT AND REPLACE IF NECESSARY FOR NEW CHILLER. APPROXIMATE LOCATION OF CWS/CWR ENTRY TO HOUSE AIR SEPARATOR 16" TALL TO BE LOCATED AS LOW AS POSSIBLE WHILE STILL SERVING MECHANICAL PURPOSE AND SERVICEABLY ACCESSIBLE. EXPANSION TANK 16" TALL TO BE LOCATED AS LOW AS POSSIBLE WHILE STILL SERVING MECHANICAL PURPOSE AND SERVICEABLY ACCESSIBLE. (2) PUMPS 10" TALL TO BE LOCATED AS LOW AS POSSIBLE WHILE STILL SERVING MECHANICAL PURPOSE AND SERVICEABLY ACCESSIBLE. PREFERRED LOCATION IS INSIDE IF POSSIBLE. IF EXTERIOR PROVIDE WEATHER COVER. MOUNT ON SIDE OF WALL. SCALE:1 PROPOSED MECHANICAL FIRST FLOOR 3/16" = 1'-0" AUTO AIR VENT FIELD VERIFY EXISTING EXPANSION TANK AND REPLACE WITH EQUIVALENT. SUPPLY TO BUILDING RETURN FROM BUILDING 2" PROPOSED CHILLER PIPING DIAGRAM CHILLER: SAMSUNG DVM AG010 CHILLED WATER CIRCULATOR PUMPS (P-Y). TO BE LOCATED IN BUILDING IF POSSIBLE. SEE INLINE PUMP DETAIL TYP. FOR ADDITIONAL HYDRONIC COMPONENT.S IN OUT COMBINATION PRESSURE/ TEMPERATURE SENSOR TYP. CH-1 IN OUT SPIROTHERM SPIROVENT VSR200 BT-1 2-1/2" 2" CH-1 2" 2"2" AS-1ET-1 120 GALLON BUFFER TANK TO BE 40" TALL ON EQUIPMENT PAD SEE PIPING DIAGRAM FOR ALL PIPING COMPONENTS P-X P-X 1' - 8 1 8" 4' - 3 " 1'-41 8" EACH CHILLER HAS ITS OWN INJECTION PUMP REF. PIPING DIAGRAM RESPECT ALL EQUIPMENT CLEARANCES, REF. INSTALLATION MANUAL FOR DIMENSIONS. BT-1 SA R D Y H O U S E 12 8 E a s t M a i n S t r e e t As p e n , C O COPYRIGHT 2023C SCALE DRAWN BY / CHECKED BY DATE AS NOTED AL B U Q U E R Q U E | AV O N | DE N V E R | FO R T C O L L I N S 30 3 . 2 7 8 . 3 8 2 0 ww w ˛bg b u i l d i n g w o r k s ˛co m Pr o j e c t N o . 9 8 5 3 . 0 0 Co p y r i g h t 2 0 1 7 S: \ B G P R O J E C T S \ 9 8 5 3 . 0 0 S A R D Y H O U S E R E N O V A T I O N \ D R A W I N G S \ C H I L L E R U P G R A D E \ P E R M I T S E T M U L T I S T A C K \ 9 8 5 3 0 0 _ M 2 . 0 2 . D W G PROGRESS SET 02/29/24 FIRST FLOOR MECHANICAL PLAN - OPTION A M2.02 PBM/BPL 17 7 SCALE:1 PARTIAL MECHANICAL PLAN HORIZONTAL BUFFER TANK W/GUARDS 1/2" = 1'-0" 1.RE: M1.00 FOR MECHANICAL DIAGRAMS. 2.PIPING ON EXTERIOR WALLS, PRE-CAST CONCRETE WALLS, IMMEDIATELY BELOW ROOFS, OR WITHIN CANTILEVERED FLOORS FULLY ON INTERIOR/WARM SIDE OF INSULATION. PROVIDE FURRED/FRAMED SPACE AS REQUIRED. 3.PROTECT PIPING ROUTED ALONG COLUMNS, WALLS, ETC. FROM DAMAGE AS NECESSARY WITH CAGES. COORDINATE WITH ARCHITECT. 4.ALL BRANCH CHILLED AND HEATING WATER PIPING TO FAN COIL UNITS SHALL BE 3/4" U.N.O. 5.ALL VALVES SHALL BE INSTALLED ABOVE DROP-IN CEILINGS IN ACCESSIBLE LOCATIONS, OR WITH ACCESS PANELS IN HARD-LID CEILINGS. 6.CONDENSATE LINES - MUST STAND OFF OF THE WALL NO LESS THAN ONE HALF OF AN INCH TO FACILITATE CLEANING OR BE SEALED TO THE WALL. MECHANICAL NOTES: 14'-10" PROPERTY LINE FIELD VERIFY (E) ELECTRICAL DISCONNECT AND REPLACE IF NECESSARY FOR NEW CHILLER. APPROXIMATE LOCATION OF CWS/CWR ENTRY TO HOUSE AIR SEPARATOR 16" TALL TO BE LOCATED AS LOW AS POSSIBLE WHILE STILL SERVING MECHANICAL PURPOSE AND SERVICEABLY ACCESSIBLE. EXPANSION TANK 16" TALL TO BE LOCATED AS LOW AS POSSIBLE WHILE STILL SERVING MECHANICAL PURPOSE AND SERVICEABLY ACCESSIBLE. (2) PUMPS 10" TALL TO BE LOCATED AS LOW AS POSSIBLE WHILE STILL SERVING MECHANICAL PURPOSE AND SERVICEABLY ACCESSIBLE. PREFERRED LOCATION IS INSIDE IF POSSIBLE. IF EXTERIOR PROVIDE WEATHER COVER. MOUNT ON SIDE OF WALL. AS-1ET-1 120 GALLON BUFFER TANK TO BE 40" TALL ON EQUIPMENT PAD SEE PIPING DIAGRAM FOR ALL PIPING COMPONENTS EACH CHILLER HAS ITS OWN INJECTION PUMP REF. PIPING DIAGRAM 3 M2.04 4 M2.04 6" 2' - 1 0 5 8" 5'-103 4"5'-103 4" BT-1 6" 2' 6" 1' - 7 " 3' 5' - 7 " 5'6" 1' - 9 3 4" 1'-61 2"1'-61 2" 1' - 9 3 4" 1'-4" 16'-21 2" SCALE:3 CHILLER ELEVATION W/GUARDS 1/4" = 1'-0"SCALE:2 CHILLER ELEVATION W/GUARDS 1/4" = 1'-0" AS-1 PUMP ET-1 PUMP 5' - 6 " PUMP 7' - 6 3 4" 2'-105 8" WIND/HAIL GUARD 4' - 1 3 4" 1'-93 4"CHILLER 8" STAND 8" PAD 8' - 2 3 4" 8' - 6 3 4" BT-1 CHILLER 5' - 6 " AS-1 PUMP ET-1 CHILLER 2' - 4 " 7' - 6 3 4" WIND/HAIL GUARD 5'-103 4"5'-103 4" 5'4' - 1 3 4" 1'-61 2"1'-61 2" WIND/HAIL GUARD 8" STAND 8" 8' - 6 3 4" PAD SA R D Y H O U S E 12 8 E a s t M a i n S t r e e t As p e n , C O COPYRIGHT 2023C SCALE DRAWN BY / CHECKED BY DATE AS NOTED AL B U Q U E R Q U E | AV O N | DE N V E R | FO R T C O L L I N S 30 3 . 2 7 8 . 3 8 2 0 ww w ˛bg b u i l d i n g w o r k s ˛co m Pr o j e c t N o . 9 8 5 3 . 0 0 Co p y r i g h t 2 0 1 7 S: \ B G P R O J E C T S \ 9 8 5 3 . 0 0 S A R D Y H O U S E R E N O V A T I O N \ D R A W I N G S \ C H I L L E R U P G R A D E \ P E R M I T S E T M U L T I S T A C K \ 9 8 5 3 0 0 _ M 2 . 0 3 . D W G PROGRESS SET 02/29/24 BUFFER TANK PLAN OPTIONS M2.03 PBM/BPL 17 8 &KLOOHU 7HFKQLFDO'DWD%RRN '90&KLOOHUIRU1RUWK$PHULFD 5$+]+3 0RGHO$*.69  179 krameRetaDnoitacifidoMnoisreV Ver.1.0 Release DVM Chiller TDB for North America ‘16. 05. 18. History Ver.1.1 1) Modify heating COP of specification (4p)  0RGLI\ǻ7RIFDSDFLW\WDEOH S  $GGFRUUHFWLRQIDFWRUE\DOWLWXGH S ‘16. 05. 31. Ver.1.2 1) Modify 6SHFLILFDWLRQ S FRROLQJFDSDFLW\FRROLQJSRZHULQSXWFRROLQJ((5 ,3/9ZDWHUIORZDQGPLQLPXPZDWHUYROXPHLQWKHV\VWHP (AG015KSV***) &DSDFLW\WDEOH S PRGHOQDPHFRROLQJFDSDFLW\ 6RXQGOHYHO S PRGHOQDme ‘16. 06. 16. Ver.1.3 Modification for specifications (5p) 7KHXQLWIRUDLUSUHVVXUH3Dĺ3DDQGLQ$T $GGGDWDIRUZDWHUVLGHKHDWH[FKDQJHUT¶W\DQGPD[LPXP RSHUDWLRQSUHVVXUHRIZDWHUFLUFXLW $* .69$-+$$ 7KHXQLWIRUZDWHUSUHVVXUHN3DRU03DĺIW$TDQGSVL 0RGLILFDWLRQIRUµ'LPHQVLRQV¶WLWOH1HWĺ6KLSSLQJ $GGWKHQRWHIRUµ6WDQGDUG¶W\SHFRPELQDWLRQ S µ Ver.1.µ0RGLI\'LPHQVLRQDO'UDZLQJ(p) 3LSLQJ'LDJUDP S  Ver.1.µ0RGLILHGWKH+HDWLQJ&DSDFLW\7DEOH(p) Ver.1.µ5HYLVHGWKH&23YDOXHXQLWWR:: S Ver.1.µ0RGLILHGWKH+HDWLQJCDSDFLW\7DEOHDQG6SHFLILFDWLRQSDJH 180 1RPHQFODWXUH 0RGHO1DPH $*    .  6  9  $  )  +  $$ %X\HU  &ODVVLILFDWLRQ $* &KLOOHU  &DSDFLW\ 8657 GLJLWV  9HUVLRQ )  +  -  .   3URGXFW7\SH 6 6HW ; 2XWGRRU8QLW  )HDWXUH 9 ,QYHUWHU  )HDWXUH $ 6WDQGDUG*HQHUDO7HPS0RGXOH  5DWLQJ9ROWDJH ) ‘a9+] + ‘9+]  0RGH + +HDW3XPS $0 '90 1 ,QGRRU8QLW - ‘9+] 181 &RQWHQWV  6SHFLILFDWLRQ 3LSLQJGLDJUDP        0RGXODWLRQJXLGH &DSDFLW\WDEOH &DSDFLW\FRUUHFWLRQ 'LPHQVLRQDOGUDZLQJ 6RXQGOHYHO (OHFWULFDOZLULQJGLDJUDP    2SHUDWLRQOLPLW +\GUDXOLFSHUIRUPDQFH ([WHUQDOFRQWDFW 182 Specification1 * Certified efficiency data in accordance with AHRI Standard 550/590. * Specification may be changed without further notification. DVM Chiller DVM Chiller DVM Chiller DVM Chiller DVM Chiller AG010KSVAFH/AA AG015KSVAFH/AA AG010KSVAJH/AA AG015KSVAJH/AA ĭ, #, V, Hz 3,3,208~230,60 3,3,208~230,60 3,3,460,60 3,3,460,60 -HEAT PUMP HEAT PUMP HEAT PUMP HEAT PUMP usRT 10 15 10 15 HP 12 18 12 18 Cooling kBtu/h 120.0 168.0 120.0 168.0 Leaving Temp. 105°F kBtu/h 128.0 182.0 128.0 182.0 Leaving Temp. 120°F kBtu/h 120.0 171.0 120.0 171.0 Leaving Temp. 105°F kBtu/h 84.0 90.0 84.0 90.0 Leaving Temp. 120°FkBtu/h 80.0 85.0 80.0 85.0 Cooling kW 10.71 16.63 10.71 16.63 Leaving Temp. 105°F kW 9.77 15.17 9.77 15.17 Leaving Temp. 120°F kW 11.54 17.45 11.54 17.45 Leaving Temp. 105°F kW 11.20 11.20  Leaving Temp. 120°F kW 12.70 12.70  Cooling A 29.59 47.24 15.81 25.25 Leaving Temp. 105°F A 26.99 41.91 14.43 22.40 Leaving Temp. 120°F A 31.88 48.20 17.04 25.77 Leaving Temp. 105°F A 30.94 316.54 17. Leaving Temp. 120°F A 35.08 318.75  A 52.0 70.0 24.0 40.0 A 70.0 90.0 30.0 50.0 Btu/(W×h)11.20 10.10 11.20 10.10 Leaving Temp. 105°F 3.84 3.52 Leaving Temp. 120°F 3.05 2.87 Leaving Temp. 105°F 2.2 2.23 Leaving Temp. 120°F 1.85 1.95 Btu/(W×h)20.5 18.8 20.5 18.8 -Scroll Inverter Scroll Inverter Scroll Inverter Scroll Inverter kW × n 6.45 × 2 6.45 × 2 6.76 × 2 6.76 × 2 DS4GJ5066EVA DS4GJ5066EVA DS-GB070FAVA DS-GB070FAVA Ty pe -PVE PVE PVE PVE -Propeller Propeller Propeller Propeller W 630 x 2 630 x 2 630 x 2 630 x 2 CFM 12,855 12,855 12,855 12,855 Pa 78.5 78.5 78.5 78.5 inAq 0.315 0.315 0.315 0.315 -Brazing Plate Brazing Plate Brazing Plate Brazing Plate Cooling GPM 15.8 16.8 15.8 16.8 Heating GPM 15.8 16.8 15.8 16.8 Cooling GPM 24.0 33.6 24.0 33.6 Heating GPM 24.0 33.6 24.0 33.6 Cooling GPM 48.0 67.2 48.0 67.2 Heating GPM 48.0 67.2 48.0 67.2 EA 2222 -50A Cut Groov e 50A Cut Groove 50A Cut Groove 50A Cut Groove ftAq 12.38 23.42 12.38 23.42 psi 5.37 10.15 5.37 10.15 ftAq 335 335 335 335 psi 145 145 145 145 Cooling gal 72.0 100.8 72.0 100.8 Heating gal 72.0 100.8 72.0 100.8 -R410A R410A R410A R410A lbs 40 40 40 40 dB(A)60 62 60 62 dB(A)80 83 80 83 lbs 959 959 959 959 lbs 1008 1008 1008 1008 inch 70.67 x 66.73 x 30.12 70.67 x 66.73 x 30.12 70.67 x 66.73 x 30.12 70.67 x 66.73 x 30.12 inch 74.80 x 74.29 x 36.18 74.80 x 74.29 x 36.18 74.80 x 74.29 x 36.18 74.80 x 74.29 x 36.18 ȕ 41 ~ 77 41 ~ 77 41 ~ 77 41 ~ 77 ȕ 14 ~ 77 14 ~ 77 14 ~ 77 14 ~ 77 ȕ 77 ~ 131 77 ~ 131 77 ~ 131 77 ~ 131 ȕ 5 ~ 118 5 ~ 118 5 ~ 118 5 ~ 118 ȕ -13 ~ 109 -13 ~ 109 -13 ~ 109 -13 ~ 109 HP Output Model Name Operating Water Temp. Range Cooling Cooling (If using brine) Heating Operating Amb. Temp. Range Cooling Heating Sound Sound Pressure Sound Power External Dimension Net Weight Shipping Weight Net Dimensions (WxHxD) 6KLSSLQJ Dimensions (WxHxD) Water circuit Connection Type Minimum water volume in the system Refrigerant Type Factory Charging Nominal water pressure drop Max. operation pressure Water Side Heat Exchanger Ty pe Water Flow Minimum Nominal Maximum Quantity Compressor Type Oil Fan Type Output x n Air Flow Rate External Static Pressure Max. Dry/Wet Bulb 47/43°F Dry/Wet Bulb 17/15°F MCA MOP Efficiency Cooling EER Heating COP Dry/Wet Bulb 47/43°F Dry/Wet Bulb 17/15°F IPLV Dry/Wet Bulb 17/15°F Power Power Input Amb. 95°F, Entering/Leaving Temp 55/44°F Heating Dry/Wet Bulb 47/43°F Dry/Wet Bulb 17/15°F Current Input Amb. 95°F, Entering/Leaving Temp 55/44°F Heating Ty pe Model Name Power Supply Mode Performance Ton Capacity (Rated) Amb. 95°F, Entering/Leaving Temp 55/44°F Heating Dry/Wet Bulb 47/43°F 3.84 3.05 2.2 1.85 3.52 2.87 2.23 1.95 Btu/(W×h) Btu/(W×h) Btu/(W×h) Btu/(W×h) 183 0RGXODWLRQJXLGH 7RWDOFDSDFLW\RIPRGXODWHGXQLWV ȈFDSDFLW\RIHDFKFKLOOHUXQLW 7RWDOSRZHULQSXWRIPRGXODWHGXQLWV ȈSRZHULQSXWRIHDFKFKLOOHUXQLW 6WDQGDUG LVFRPSDFWFRPELQDWLRQW\SHWKDQ +LJKHIILFLHQF\ IRUVPDOOHULQVWDOODWLRQVSDFH '90&KLOOHU $*.69 $*.69 5HFRPPHQGHG SLSHVL]H>$@ $*.69 $*.69 5HFRPPHQGHG SLSHVL]H>$@                                                                                                                       +3 XV57 6WDQGDUG +LJK(IILFLHQF\ 184 &DSDFLW\WDEOH %QQNKPI ů6ș  >127(@ &DSDFLW\WDEOHPD\EHVXEMHFWWRFKDQJHZLWKRXWSULRUQRWLFH  ǻ7 /HDYLQJZDWHUWHPSHUDWXUH(QWHULQJZDWHUWHPSHUDWXUH  :KHQXVLQJEULQHUHIHUWRWKHFDSDFLW\FRUUHFWLRQIDFWRUVE\EULQHZW 7KLVFDSDFLW\GDWDLVEDVHGRQ(WK\OHQHJO\FROZW  ǻ7LVFRPSO\ZLWKWKHFRQGLWLRQRIPLQLPXPIORZUDWH  /:7/HDYLQJZDWHUWHPSHUDWXUH7&7RWDO&DSDFLW\3,3RZHU,QSXW 7& 3, :DWHU IORZ 7& 3, :DWHU IORZ 7& 3, :DWHU IORZ 7& 3, :DWHU IORZ 7& 3, :DWHU IORZ 7& 3, :DWHU IORZ 7& 3, :DWHU IORZ 7& 3, :DWHU IORZ 7RQ N: *30 7RQ N: *30 7RQ N: *30 7RQ N: *30 7RQ N: *30 7RQ N: *30 7RQ N: *30 7RQ N: *30                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                         2XWGRRU$LU7HPSHUDWXUH එ'% /:7 $*.69 $*.69 7& 3, :DWHU IORZ 7& 3, :DWHU IORZ 7& 3, :DWHU IORZ 7& 3, :DWHU IORZ 7& 3, :DWHU IORZ 7& 3, :DWHU IORZ 7& 3, :DWHU IORZ 7& 3, :DWHU IORZ 7RQ N: *30 7RQ N: *30 7RQ N: *30 7RQ N: *30 7RQ N: *30 7RQ N: *30 7RQ N: *30 7RQ N: *30                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                              /:7 *GCVKPI ů6ș $*.69 $*.69 2XWGRRU$LUWHPSHUDWXUH ȕ'% 7& 3, :DWHU )ORZ 7& 3, :DWHU )ORZ 7& 3, :DWHU )ORZ 7& 3, :DWHU )ORZ 7& 3, :DWHU )ORZ 7& 3, :DWHU )ORZ 7& 3, :DWHU )ORZ 7& 3, :DWHU )ORZ 7& 3, :DWHU )ORZ 7& 3, :DWHU )ORZ 7& 3, :DWHU )ORZ 8657 N: *30 8657 N: *30 8657 N: *30 8657 N: *30 8657 N: *30 8657 N: *30 8657 N: *30 8657 N: *30 8657 N: *30 8657 N: *30 8657 N: *30                                                                                                                                                                                                           2XWGRRU$LUWHPSHUDWXUH ƒ)'% /:7 ƒ)        7& 3, :DWHU )ORZ 7& 3, :DWHU )ORZ 7& 3, :DWHU )ORZ 7& 3, :DWHU )ORZ 7& 3, :DWHU )ORZ 7& 3, :DWHU )ORZ 7& 3, :DWHU )ORZ 7& 3, :DWHU )ORZ 7& 3, :DWHU )ORZ 7& 3, :DWHU )ORZ 7& 3, :DWHU )ORZ 8657 N: *30 8657 N: *30 8657 N: *30 8657 N: *30 8657 N: *30 8657 N: *30 8657 N: *30 8657 N: *30 8657 N: *30 8657 N: *30 8657 N: *30                                                                                                                                                                                                          /:7  ƒ) 2XWGRRU$LUWHPSHUDWXUH ƒ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ሥ 0LQ /:7 ሥ (WK\OHQHJO\FRO 3URS\OHQHJO\FRO ZW )UHH]LQJ SRLQW ሥ &RUUHFWLRQIDFWRU )UHH]LQJ SRLQW ሥ          $*.69          $*.69          0RGHO 2XWGRRU$LU7HPSHUDWXUH ሥ'% 186 &DSDFLW\FRUUHFWLRQ  &RUUHFWLRQIDFWRUE\ZDWHUIORZUDWH   4XLHWIXQFWLRQFRUUHFWLRQIDFWRU           3RZHULQSXW           ¨7 ሥ           &RUUHFWLRQ RIQRUPLQDOZDWHUIORZUDWH &DSDFLW\ 3RZHU,QSXW &DSDFLW\ 3RZHU,QSXW &DSDFLW\ 3RZHU,QSXW &DSDFLW\ 3RZHU,QSXW /HYHO        /HYHO        /HYHO        4XLHWIXQFWLRQ 2XWGRRU$LU7HPSHUDWXUH ሥ'%     &DSDFLW\ 3RZHU,QSXW &DSDFLW\ 3RZHU,QSXW &DSDFLW\ 3RZHU,QSXW &DSDFLW\ 3RZHU,QSXW /HYHO        /HYHO        /HYHO        4XLHWIXQFWLRQ 2XWGRRU$LU7HPSHUDWXUH ሥ'%     &RROLQJ +HDWLQJ  &RUUHFWLRQIDFWRUE\DOWLWXGH Altitude (m)0           2QYGT KPRWV 1.0000 1.0091 1.0185 1.0281 1.0380 1.0481 1.0585 1.0692 1.0801 1.0913 1.1029 187 'LPHQVLRQDOGUDZLQJ '90&KLOOHU $*.69  Units : mm [inches] Detail A 19 3 [7 1 / 2 ” ] 254 [10”] 230 [9”] 10 0 [4 ” ] 765 74 625 803 [3”] 87 [3 1/2”] [2 ’ - 1 / 4 ” ] [2’ - 7 1/2”] [2’ - 1/2”] 65 61 6 [2 1 / 2 ” ] 10 7 [4 1 / 4 ” ] 55 [2 1 / 4 ” ] 75 [3”] 5 5 6 21 4 3 3 4 A 1796 1571 [5’ - 1 3/4”] 74 [3”] 11 5 [4 1 / 2 ” ] 17 9 [7 ” ] [5 ’ - 6 3 / 4 ” ] 61 9 5 11 5 [4 1 / 2 ” ] 17 9 [7 ” ] 95 [3 3 / 4 ” ] 65 [2 1 / 2 ” ] 10 7 [4 1 / 4 ” ] [1 ’ - 7 1 / 4 ” ] 49 2 65 [2 1 / 2 ” ] 6 55 [2 1 / 4 ” ] 40 [1 1/2”] 47 [1 3/4”] 75 [3”] 1655 [5’ - 5 1/4”] 76 1 4-20 x 12 SLOT HOLE Foundation bolt holes [2 ’ - 6 ” ] pi t c h o f f o u n d a t i o n b o l t h o l e s [5’ - 10 3/4”] pitch of foundation bolt holes NO ITEM SPEC 1 INLET WATER FLANGE +3$&87*URRYHG7\SH 8VHWKH&RXSOLQJLQ$60(VWDQGUHGL]HGSURGXFW 2 OUTLET WATER FLANGE +3$&87*URRYHG7\SH 8VHWKH&RXSOLQJLQ$60(VWDQGUHGL]HGSURGXFW 3 POWER WIRING CONDUIT KNOCK OUT HOLE (FRONT) 4 COMMUNICATION WIRING CONDUIT KNOCK OUT HOLE (FRONT) 5 POWER WIRING CONDUIT KNOCK OUT HOLE (SIDE) 6 COMMUNICATION WIRING CONDUIT KNOCK OUT HOLE (SIDE) 188 1&1& 6RXQGOHYHO  6RXQGSUHVVXUHOHYHO 1RWH 6SHFLILFDWLRQVPD\EHVXEMHFWWRFKDQJHZLWKRXWSULRUQRWLFH  7KHVHRSHUDWLRQYDOXHVZHUHREWDLQHGLQDQDQHFKRLFURRP  6RXQGSUHVVXUHOHYHOZLOOYDU\GHSHQGLQJRQDUDQJHRIIDFWRUVVXFKDVWKHFRQVWUXFWLRQRIWKHSDUWLFXODUURRP  2SHUDWLRQVRXQGOHYHOPD\GLIIHUGHSHQGLQJRQRSHUDWLRQDQGDPELHQWFRQGLWLRQV  1&FXUYHV 8QLWG% $ 0RGHO 3UHVVXUH $*.69  $*.69  1& 1& 1& 1& 1& 1& 1& 1& 1& 1&         2FWDYHEDQGFHQWHUIUHTXHQF\ +]           6R X Q G  S U H V V X U H  O H Y H O G % D $*.69 1& 1& 1& 1& 1& 1& 1& 1& 1& 1&         2FWDYHEDQGFHQWHUIUHTXHQF\ +]           6R X Q G  S U H V V X U H  O H Y H O G % E $*.69   4XLHWIXQFWLRQ /HYHO /HYHO /HYHO $*.69    $*.69    6RXQGSUHVVXUHOHYHOIRUTXLHWIXQFWLRQ>G% $ @ 0RGHO 189 6RXQGOHYHO  6RXQGSRZHUOHYHO 1RWH        2FWDYHEDQGFHQWHUIUHTXHQF\ +]            6R X Q G  S R Z H U  O H Y H O G % D $*.69        2FWDYHEDQGFHQWHUIUHTXHQF\ +]            6R X Q G  S R Z H U  O H Y H O G % E$*.69 6SHFLILFDWLRQVPD\EHVXEMHFWWRFKDQJH  G%$ $ZHLJKWHGVRXQGSRZHUOHYHO  5HIHUHQFHSRZHUS:  0HDVXUHGDFFRUGLQJWR,62  8QLWG% $ 0RGHO 3RZHU $*.69  $*.69  190 (OHFWULFDOZLULQJGLDJUDP  ,QYHUWHUFRQWUROOHU $*.69$)+  191 (OHFWULFDOZLULQJGLDJUDP  ,QYHUWHUFRQWUROOHU $*.69$-+  192 (OHFWULFDOZLULQJGLDJUDP  +\GURFRQWUROOHU $*.69$)+$*.69$-+  193 3LSLQJGLDJUDP '90&KLOOHU $*.69  Themistor - EVI In (T_EI) Pressure Sensor - High (PS_H) Themistor - Compressor Top 1 (T_CT1) Themistor - Discharge pipe 1 (T_D1) Oil Separator 1 (OS1)Solenoid Valve - Hot Gas bypass (V_HG) Check Valve - Discharge 1 (CV_D1) Pressure Sensor - Low (PS_L)Thermistor - Suction pipe (T_S) Service Port - Charging (PT_C) Service Port - Charging (PT_C) Thermistor - Suction pipe 1 (T_S1) Solenoid Valve - Accumulator oil return (V_AR) Solenoid Valve - EVI 2 (V_EVI2) Solenoid Valve - Oil Return (V_OR1) (V_OR2) Solenoid Valve - EVI 1 (V_EVI2) (CV_D2) (OS2) (T_D2)(T_CT2) Heat Exchanger - Main (HX_M) Outdoor Fan Motor 1 (OFM1) Heat Exchanger - SUB (HX_SUB) Outdoor Fan Motor 2 (OFM2) Solenoid Valve - 4Way (V_4W) Thermistor - Ambient (T_A) Thermistor - Suction pipe 2 (T_S2) Pressure Switch - High 1 (PW_H1) (PW_H2) Compressor 1 (COMP1) Compressor 2 (COMP2) Heat Exchanger - Intercooler (HX_IC) Thermistor - Cond Out (T_CO) IPM Cooler 2 (IPMC2) IPM Cooler 1 (IPMC1) Electronic Expansion Valve - Main (E_M1) Themistor - EVI Out (T_EO) Themistor - Liquid pipe (T_L) Electronic Expansion Valve - Main (E_M2) Solenoid Valve - EVI Bypass (V_EB) Accumulator (AC) Reciever (RC) Electronic Expansion Valve - EVI (E_EVI) Electronic Expansion Valve - PHE 1 (E_PHE1) Thermistor – Water Out (T_WO) Thermistor – Water In (T_WI) Thermistor – PHE Out 1 (T_PO1) Thermistor – PHE Out 2 (T_PO2) Thermistor – PHE In 1 (T_PI1) Heat Exchanger - PHE 2 (HX_PHE2) Heat Exchanger - PHE 1 (HX_PHE1) Pressure Sensor - Water Out (PS_WO) Pressure Sensor - Water In (PS_WI) Thermistor – PHE In 2 (T_PI2) Electronic Expansion Valve - PHE 2 (E_PHE2) Fusible Plug (FP) 194  &RROLQJ  +HDWLQJ 2SHUDWLRQOLPLW  ƒ) ƒ)    2XWOHWWHPSHUDWXUH $QWLIUHH]H FRQGLWLRQ :DWHU FRQGLWLRQ ƒ)      ƒ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‡ 2XWSXWZULWWHQDERYHLVLQIRUPDWLRQDERXWLQGLYLGXDOXQLW &$87,21 ‡ <RXPXVWWXUQRIIWKHSRZHUEHIRUHZRUNLQJRQH[WHUQDOFRQWDFWZLULQJ ‡ ([WHUQDOFRQWUROOHU ''&'LUHFW'LJLWDO&RQWURO 5HIHUWRWKHPDQXDOSURYLGHGZLWKWKHH[WHUQDOFRQWUROOHUIRUXVLQJ ''& 3RZHU $&RU'& /DPSRURXWSXWORDG 2XWSXWWHUPLQDOEORFN )LHOGVFRSH Unit : N·m (lbf·in) Terminal block Tightening torque 20P T/B M3 0.5~0.75 (4.4~6.6) >([DPSOHRIRXWSXWFRQWDFWLQVWDOODWLRQ@ ‡ 2XWSXWFRQWDFWFDQEHFRQQHFWHGQHXWUDOFRQWDFWDQG2SHQ6KRUWRQO\ %HVXUHWRLQVWDOODEX]]HU DODUP RQWHUPLQDOVDQGLQRUGHUWKDW WKHRSHUDWRUFDQFKHFNWKHV\VWHPZKHQWKHIUHH]HSURWHFWLRQIXQFWLRQ VWDUWV 197 :LULQJZRUN ([WHUQDOFRQWDFW ,QSXWFRQWDFW  %7% 1R 1DPH 6LJQDO )XQFWLRQ &RQWDFW6KRUW &RQWDFW 2SHQ 6LJQDO UHFRJQLWLRQ 6HWWLQJ XQLW %7%  'LVXVH        'LVXVH        'LVXVH        3XPSLQWHUORFN =HUR YROWDJH FRQWDFW 6LJQDODERXWSXPSRSHUDWLRQ ‡ 3XPSLQWHUORFNHUURU ( RFFXUVLI21LVQRWLQSXWZKHQ RSHUDWLQJSXPS 3XPS21 3XPS2)) 8VXDOLQSXW (DFKXQLW  2SHUDWLRQ212)) &RQWUROOLQJRSHUDWLRQ212)) 1RWH 1RWH 8VXDOLQVWDQW LQSXW 0DLQXQLW RIJURXS 1RWH   2SHUDWLRQPRGH 6HOHFWLQJFRROKHDWPRGH 1RWH +HDW &RRO 8VXDOLQSXW 0DLQXQLW RIJURXS 1RWH  +RWZDWHU PRGH (QWHULQJKRWZDWHU FRROVWRUDJH  PRGHE\H[WHUQDOFRQWURO ‡ &RRO21&RROVWRUDJH ‡ +HDW21+RWZDWHU +RWZDWHU &RRO+HDW 8VXDOLQSXW 0DLQXQLW RIJURXS 1RWH  +RWZDWHU FRQWUROVWDQGDUG &RQWUROGHSHQGLQJRQVHW WHPSHUDWXUHZKHQ21 &RQWUROGHSHQGLQJRQH[WHUQDOKRW ZDWHU FRROVWRUDJH WKHUPRVWDW ZKHQ2)) &RQWUROE\VHW WHPSHUDWXUH &RQWUROE\ WKHUPRVWDW 8VXDOLQSXW 0DLQXQLW RIJURXS 1RWH  +RWZDWHU WKHUPRVWDWVLJQDO :KHQWKHUPRVWDWLVVHWDVVWDQGDUG IRUKRWZDWHU FRROVWRUDJH PRGH ‡ 7KHUPR21ZKHQ21 1RW RYHUUDQJHRIZDWHURXWOHW WHPSHUDWXUH ‡ 7KHUPR2))ZKHQ2)) 7KHUPR21 7KHUPR2)) 8VXDOLQSXW 0DLQXQLW RIJURXS 1RWH ‡ 7RXVHKRWZDWHU FRROVWRUDJH PRGHWKHIXQFWLRQVKRXOGEHDFWLYDWHGE\0RGXOH&RQWUROOHU ‡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‡ 2SHUDWHVRQO\ZKHQUHPRWHHUURU UHVHWLQSXWIXQFWLRQLVVHWWRXVH 5HVHWHUURU ,QVWDQWLQSXW 0DLQXQLW RIPRGXOH  'LVXVH  1RXVH 1$    :DWHUODZ =HUR YROWDJH FRQWDFW 2SHUDWHZDWHUODZ1RWH :DWHUODZ FRQWURO :DWHU RXWOHWVHW WHPSHUDWXUH FRQWURO 8VXDOLQSXW 0DLQXQLW RIJURXS 1RWH  'LVXVH  1RXVH 1$    'LVXVH  1RXVH 1$    6HWWHPSHUDWXUH URRP WHPSHUDWXUH VHQVRU $QDORJ FXUUHQW 5HFRJQL]HZDWHURXWOHWVHW WHPSHUDWXUHE\H[WHUQDOLQSXW 1RWH 5HFRJQL]HYDOXHRIURRPWHPSHUDWXUH VHQVRU aP$ ZKHQVWDQGDUGIRU ZDWHUODZLVURRPWHPSHUDXWUH1RWH &XUUHQWLQSXW 0DLQXQLW RIJURXS 1RWH  ([WHUQDO ZDWHURXWOHW WHPSHUDWXUH $QDORJ FXUUHQW 5HFRJQL]HH[WHUQDOZDWHURXWOHW WHPSHUDWXUHE\H[WHUQDOWHPSHUDWXUH VHQVRU aP$ 1RWH &XUUHQWLQSXW 0DLQXQLW RIJURXS 1RWH ‡ 8VXDOLQSXW2SHUDWHE\FXUUHQWVWDWXVRIFRQWDFW ,QVWDQWLQSXW2SHUDWHZKHQFRQWDFWVLJQDOFKDQJHVIURP2))WR21IURP21WR2)) aP$ 199 :LULQJZRUN ([WHUQDOFRQWDFW 1RWH  9DOXHRIZDWHURXWOHWVHWWHPSHUDWXUH ƒ&  [&XUUHQW +HDW +RWZDWHU PRGHUHFRJQL]HVPLQLPXPƒ& ƒ) DQGPD[LPXPƒ& ƒ) &RRO &RROVWRUDJH PRGHUHFRJQL]HVPLQLPXPƒ& ƒ) DQGPD[LPXPƒ& ƒ)  0LQLPXPƒ& ƒ)  ZKHQXVLQJORZWHPSHUDWXUHIXQFWLRQ 1RWH 2SHUDWHVZKHQLQSXWPHWKRGIRUTXLHWIXQFWLRQLVVHWDVH[WHUQDOFRQWDFW  ,IWKHFRQWDFWLVVKRUWTXLHWIXQFWLRQRSHUDWHVLQ&RRO+HDWPRGH  4XLHWIXQFWLRQE\0RGXOH&RQWUROOHURSHUDWHVLQ&RROPRGHDQGQLJKWWLPH 1RWH 2SHUDWHVZKHQLQSXWPHWKRGIRUGHPDQGIXQFWLRQLVVHWDVH[WHUQDOFRQWDFW 1RWH 2SHUDWHVZKHQLQSXWPHWKRGIRUIRUFHGIDQIXQFWLRQLVVHWDVH[WHUQDOFRQWDFW 1RWH 2SHUDWHVZKHQLQSXWPHWKRGIRUZDWHUODZIXQFWLRQLVVHWDVH[WHUQDOFRQWDFW 1RWH 0DLQXQLWRIPRGXOHZKHQJURXSLVQRWDYDLODEOH 127( ‡ 5RRPWHPSHUDWXUHVHQVRUDQGH[WHUQDOZDWHURXWOHWWHPSHUDWXUHWHPSHUDWXUHVHQVRULVQRWVXSSOLHG3XUFKDVH DQGLQVWDOOWKHDSSURSULDWHVHQVRUDFFRUGLQJWRWKHXVDJH   >([DPSOHRILQSXWFRQWDFWLQVWDOODWLRQ@ ([WHUQDOFRQWUROOHU ''&'LUHFW'LJLWDO&RQWURO 5HIHUWRWKHPDQXDOSURYLGHGZLWKWKHH[WHUQDOFRQWUROOHUIRUXVLQJ ,QSXWVLJQDO ,QSXWWHUPLQDOEORFN ''& )LHOGVFRSH 5RRPWHPSHUDWXUHVHQVRUP$ƒ& ƒ) P$ƒ& ƒ) ([WHUQDOZDWHURXWOHWWHPSHUDWXUHVHQVRUaP$ P$ƒ& ƒ) P$ƒ& ƒ) Note2) Room temperature (°C) = 6.25 x Current - 75 Current (mA)4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20 Temperature (°C)-50.00 -37.50 -25.00 -12.50 0.00 12.50 25.00 37.50 50.00 Temperature (°F)-58.00 -35.50 -13.00 9.50 32.00 54.50 77.00 99.50 122.00 Note3) If operation pattern is not standard control, control standard temperature depends on external water outlet temperature sensor. External water outlet temperature sensor should be installed where can represent the temperature of water pipe system. Water outlet temperature (°C) = 6.25 x Current - 55 Current (mA)4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20 Temperature (°C)-10.00 1.25 12.50 23.75 35.00 46.25 57.50 68.75 80.00 Temperature (°F)14.00 34.25 54.50 74.75 95.00 115.25 135.50 155.75 176.00 Current (mA)4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20 Temperature (°C)-30.00 -17.50 -5.00 7.50 20.00 32.50 45.00 57.50 70.00 Temperature (°F)-22.00 0.50 23.00 45.50 68.00 90.50 113.00 135.50 158.00 200  "/H9H? 6DPVXQJ(OHFWURQLFV&R/7' +HDG2IILFH 6XZRQ.RUHD 6DPVXQJ5R<HRQJWRQJ*X6XZRQ&LW\*\HRQJJL'R.RUHD :HEVLWHZZZVDPVXQJFRP(PDLODLUFRQGLWLRQHU#VDPVXQJFRP ,PDJHVDQGGDWDLQWKLVERRNPD\VXEMHFWWRFKDQJHZLWKRXWSULRUQRWLFH201 Job Name Location Purchaser Engineer Submitted to Reference Approval Construction Unit Designation Schedule # 6LGHJXDUGV 7RSJXDUG ODUJHFKDVVLV %DFNJXDUG VPDOOFKDVVLV %DFNJXDUG ODUJHFKDVVLV SUBMITTAL Samsung HVAC maintains a policy of ongoing development,specifications are subject to change without notice. www.SamsungHVAC.com 888-699-6067 Page 1of 4WHG-S*, WHG-R*, WHG-T*, WHG-F** Wind/Hail Guards for Samsung DVM S Outdoor Units © 2020 Samsung HVAC SHA-DVMS-03162021 Required WHG-SL (left side wind/hail guard, small/large chassis) Model Number WHG-T2 (top guard, large/18 ton chassis) WHG-T1 (top guard, small chassis) WHG-R2 (back wind/hail guard, large chassis) WHG-R1 (back wind/hail guard, small chassis) WHG-SR (right side wind/hail guard, small/large chassis) WHG-SLR (right/left side wind/hail guard, 18 ton chassis) WHG-R3 (back wind/hail guard, 18 ton chassis) Description Front WHG-SL WHG-SR WHG-SLR WHG-R1 WHG-R2 WHG-R3 WHG-T1 WHG-T2 WHG-F1 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X Wind/Hail Guard Type AM216KXVGJH/AA AM216KXVGJR/AA RearSide •All wind/hail guards ship fully assembled and include mounting hardware. •Modular systems (2 or 3 outdoor units) only require one left guard and one right guard when modules are installed at the minimum distance from each other as noted in the outdoor unit installation manual. •WHG-T1, WHG-T2, and WHG-T4 can install forward or backward discharging air to the front or the back of the outdoor unit. •When using the top wind/hail guards (WHG-T1, WHG-T2,WHG-T4) ensure that prevailing winds will not blow into the guard. Prolonged exposure to strong winds blowing into the guard can decrease performance and cause motor failure. AM120FXVA*H*AA AM120FXVA*R*AA AM144FXVA*H*AA AM144FXVA*R*AA AM168HXVA*H*AA AM168HXVA*R*AA AM192HXVA*H*AA AM192HXVA*R*AA Notes •The outdoor unit must install 18" minimum above the ground or 18" minimum above anticipated snowfall depth when using WHG-SL, WHG-SR, WHG-SLR, WHG-R1, WHG-R2, WHG-R3, and WHG-F1. •Clearance around the outdoor unit must be at least 18" greater than standard clearances ("unrestricted" wall height clearances in outdoor unit installation manual) when using WHG-SL, WHG-SR, WHG-SLR, WHG-R1, WHG-R2, WHG-R3, and WHG-F1. AM072KXVT*H/AA AM096KXVT*H/AA Heat Pump Heat Recovery AM072FXVA*H*AA AM072FXVA*R*AA AM096FXVA*H*AA AM096FXVA*R*AA •When ordering side guards (WHG-SL, WHG-SR, WHG-SLR), if left and right are needed they must be ordered and purchased separately. •Made in USA Outdoor unit compatibility System type Top •Polyester Super Durable powder coating (RAL7044 SILK GREY) •Wind/hail guard for Samsung DVM S Series outdoor units. •Side and rear guards are designed to protect outdoor unit coil surfaces from high winds and hail. •Top guards are designed to divert condensing unit discharge air and/or protect the outdoor unit from hail, snow accumulation, and debris. •Construction: 20-gauge, galvanized steel WHG-F1 (front guard,18 ton chassis) AM072KXVT*R/AA AM096KXVT*R/AA WHG-T4 (top guard, DVM Chiller chassis) X X X X X X AG010KSVA*H/AA AG015KSVA*H/AA N/A N/A WHG-T4 X X 202 www.SamsungHVAC.com SUBMITTAL WHG-S*, WHG-R*, WHG-T*, WHG-F*Page 2of4 Wind/Hail Guards for Samsung DVM S Outdoor Units Weight and Required Components Per System 1 When using side wind/hail guards, if the units are installed at the minimum distance from each other as noted in the outdoor unit installation manual, only 1 X left guard and 1 X right guard is required. WHG-SL, WHG-SR, and WHG-SLR data noted above show required quantities when modular system outdoor units are installed close to each other and required quantity when they are spread further apart (in parenthesis). Note: Side guards, back guards, and top guards can be used independently (example: WHG-T2 can be installed without WHG-SL and WHG-SR, WHG-SL and WHG-SR can be used without WHG-R1). 2 Depending on the configuration and proximity of AM192HXVAJ*2AA and AM216KXVGJ*/AA modules during installation, side guard selection will vary for AM192HXVAJ*2AA module. Weight WHG-F1 (front guard, 18 ton chassis)29 56" X 17 1/2" X 22 1/2" 43.5 28" X 39" X 35 1/2" 52.5 55 1/2" X 28 1/2" X 34 1/2" 32 54" X 28" X 22 1/2" 45 58" X 47" X 22 1/2" 25.5 25" X 50 1/2" X 19 1/2" 28 31 1/2" X 50" X 19 1/2" 34 48" X 50" X 19 1/2" Model Number WHG-SL (left side wind/hail guard, small/large chassis) WHG-SR (right side wind/hail guard, small/large chassis) WHG-SLR (right side wind/hail guard, 18 ton chassis) WHG-R1 (back wind/hail guard, small chassis) WHG-R2 (back wind/hail guard, large chassis) WHG-R3 (back wind/hail guard, 18 ton chassis) WHG-T1 (top guard, small chassis) WHG-T2 (top guard, large/18 ton chassis) Ship weight (lbs.)Shipping dimensions 26.5 29" X 50 1/2" X 19 1/2" Components required 78 74 7/16" X 27 1/2" X 34 5/8"WHG-T4 (top guard, Chiller chassis) Front guard WHG-SL1 WHG-SR1 WHG-SLR1 WHG-R1 WHG-R2 WHG-R3 WHG-T1 WHG-T2 WHG-T4 WHG-F1 AM072FXVA***AA 6 1 1 1 1 AM096FXVA***AA 8 1 1 1 1 AM120FXVA***AA 10 1 1 1 1 AM144FXVA***AA 12 1 1 1 1 AM168HXVA***AA 14 1 1 1 1 AM192HXVA***AA 16 1 1 1 1 AM216KXVGJ*/AA 16 2 1 1 1 AM216JXVA***AA 18 1 (2) 1 (2)1 1 1 1 AM240JXVA***AA 20 1 (2) 1 (2)1 1 1 1 AM264JXVA***AA 22 1 (2) 1 (2)1 1 1 1 AM288JXVA***AA 24 1 (2) 1 (2)2 2 AM312JXVA***AA 26 1 (2) 1 (2)2 2 AM336JXVA***AA 28 1 (2) 1 (2)2 2 AM360JXVA***AA 30 1 (2) 1 (2)2 2 AM384JXVA***AA 32 1 (2) 1 (2)2 2 AM408JXVA***AA 34 1 (3) 1 (3)1 2 1 2 AM408KXVGJ**AA 34 12 1 (2)2 1 1 2 1 AM432JXVA***AA 36 1 (3) 1 (3)3 3 AM432KXVGJ**AA 36 2 (4)2 2 2 AM456JXVA***AA 38 1 (3) 1 (3)3 3 AM480JXVA***AA 40 1 (3) 1 (3)3 3 AM504JXVA***AA 42 1 (3) 1 (3)3 3 AM528JXVA***AA 44 1 (3) 1 (3)3 3 AM072KXVT**/AA 6 1 1 1 AM096KXVT**/AA 8 1 1 1 AM144KXVT**/AA 12 1 (2) 1 (2)2 2 AM168KXVT**/AA 14 1 (2) 1 (2)2 2 AM192KXVT**/AA 16 1 (2) 1 (2)2 2 AM216KXVT**/AA 18 1 (3) 1 (3)3 3 AM240KXVT**/AA 20 1 (3) 1 (3)3 3 AM264KXVT**/AA 22 1 (3) 1 (3)3 3 AM288KXVT**/AA 24 1 (3) 1 (3)3 3 AG010KSVA*H/AA 10 1 1 2 1 AG015KSVA*H/AA 15 1 1 2 1 Top guard DVM S DVM S Max Heat DVM Chiller System model number Capacity (tons) Side wind/hail guard1 Back wind/hail guard 12 203                                                     5LJKW*XDUG :+*65 /HIW*XDUG :+*6/ 7RS 7RS 6LGH 6LGH                               5HDU*XDUG VPDOOFKDVVLV:+*5 5HDU*XDUG ODUJHFKDVVLV:+*5 6LGH  6LGH 3HUIRUDWLRQIRUGDWD WDJYLHZLQJ www.SamsungHVAC.com SUBMITTAL WHG-S*, WHG-R*, WHG-T*, WHG-F*Page 3of4 Wind/Hail Guards for Samsung DVM S Outdoor Units Dimensional Data Left/Right*XDUG 18 tonFKDVVLV:+*SLR Rear*XDUG 18 tonFKDVVLV:+*R3 43 13/16" 46 1/8" 46 3/4" 57 9 / 1 6 " 21 3/8" 6LGH 7RS 24 1/8" 26 7/16" 27 7/8" 56 1 / 8 " 21 5/16" 6LGH 204                                                  7RS*XDUG ODUJHFKDVVLV:+*7 6LGH 6LGH 7RS 7RS*XDUG VPDOOFKDVVLV:+*7 %DFN %DFN www.SamsungHVAC.com SUBMITTAL WHG-S*, WHG-R*, WHG-T*, WHG-F*Page 4of4 Wind/Hail Guards for Samsung DVM S Outdoor Units Dimensional Data Top*XDUG DVM Chiller:+*T4 Front*XDUG 18 tonFKDVVLV:+*F1 14 1/32" 15 3/4" 7RS 1 1/4" 55 9 / 1 6 " 22 5/8" 6LGH 6LGH 7RS Front 74 7/16" 71" 27 1 / 2 " 34 5/8" 7RS 205 AIR ELIMINATORS STANDARD VELOCITY SPIROVENT AIR® THE ULTIMATE IN DISTRIBUTION EFFICIENCY 206 PERMANENTLY AIR-FREE SYSTEM WATER AIR IN SYSTEM WATER CAUSES MANY PROBLEMS. Noisy pipes, valves and other air-related system noises are often accepted as the signs of a functioning system. Excessive pump noise, cavitation and cascading water in terminal units are considered normal. But....serious problems can occur. Air in system water can cause corrosion, reduced e ciency, poorly heated or inadequately cooled rooms, accelerated component wear, and ongoing complaints. Result: Unnecessary maintenance costs and a dissatisfi ed owner. There is a solution! A system without air-related problems is possible! There is a device that will keep your system free of air, permanently. Less maintenance, quiet operation, fewer costs! The name: SPIROVENT AIR THE KEY DIFFERENCE The Spirovent’s unique construction allows not only for the removal of entrained air, but also for the countless microbubbles. Consisting of a woven copper wire confi guration soldered to a copper tube, the patented Spirotube® creates a low velocity area in the Spirovent that scrubs the bubbles from the water. The air bubbles rise and collect in the air chamber before they are vented from the system via an integral automatic valve. Air problems become a thing of the past! 4” Flanged 2” Threaded THE ULTIMATE IN DISTRIBUTION EFFICIENCY 207 PERMANENTLY AIR-FREE SYSTEM WATER The patented Spirotube, the core of the Spirovent INSTALL THE SPIROVENT FOR OPTIMUM PERFORMANCE Ideal placement of the Spirovent is based on microbubble separation and Henry’s Law. Simply put, Henry’s Law states that air is released from water as the temperature increases or the pressure decreases*. For this reason, the Spirovent is typically installed in the hottest point of the system. For a heating installation, this is in the supply from the boiler. In a chilled water circuit, the warmest point is in the return to the chiller. Baseboard Boiler Circulator Circulator Spirovent Air Eliminator Spirotop Acceptable location for circulator and expansion tank Recommended location for circulator and expansion tank Air Handler Chiller Circulator Expansion Tank Spirotop Spirovent Air Eliminator * For more detailed technical information, ask about our Spirotism booklet . ADVANTAGES TO THE INSTALLER AND THE END-USER Greatly reduced initial fi ll and start-up time No venting required Optimum heat transfer Increased component life Reduced oxygen-based corrosion and pump cavitation Quiet operation THE SPIROTUBE MAKES THE DIFFERENCE It allows the Spirovent to scrub out 100% of the free air, 100% of the entrained air, and up to 99.6% of the dissolved air in the system. Even the smallest microbubbles coalesce and rise. Air is eliminated, component life and heat transfer abilities are increased; oxygen-based corrosion and pump cavitation are reduced; and annoying gurgling, cascading, and other air-related system noises are eliminated. The automatic air vent is guaranteed not to leak and can only be closed by the installer for a pressure test. Lifting eyes make installation easy. The air chamber has been designed so that dirt cannot reach the valve. Welded steel construction guarantees long life. Valve for releasing large amounts of air during fi lling and for skimming o fl oating dirt. The unique Spirotube is the core of the Spirovent. Designed to trap the smallest microbubble, yet it o ers little resistance to fl ow. Threaded or fl anged connections available. Threaded 3⁄4”-4”; Flanged 2” and up. Drain plug. Also suitable for connecting a valve or temperature sensor. THE ULTIMATE IN DISTRIBUTION EFFICIENCY208 ©2014 Spirotherm, Inc. Air-2A SPIROVENT® AIR PRESSURE DROP TECHNICAL SPECIFICATIONS SPIROVENT AIR Part Number VSR200 VSR250 VSR300 VSR400 VSR500 VSR600 VSR800 VSR1000 VSR1200 Pipe Size Inch 2 2.5 3 4 5 6 8 10 12 O.D. Inch 2.375 3.0 3.5 4.5 5.5 6.625 8.625 10.75 12.75 Thread NPT 2 2.5 3 4 — — — — — D Inch 6.3 6.3 8.6 8.6 12.8 12.8 16.0 20.0 24.0 H1 Inch 19.0 19.0 23.7 23.7 30.6 30.6 38.4 47.8 56.3 h1 Inch 5.0 5.4 6.4 6.8 8.6 9.2 10.8 13.0 15.2 L (Threaded) Inch 10.2 10.2 14.6 14.6 — — — — — LF (Flanged) Inch 15.2 15.7 20.2 20.6 27.7 27.7 33.6 37.5 42.5 e Inch 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 Volume Gal. 1.3 1.3 4.5 4.5 13.2 13.2 27.7 55.5 92.5 Weight Threaded Lbs. 23 28 45 47 — — — — — Flanged Lbs. 48 59 95 107 186 200 360 564 1050 Recom. Flow* GPM 60 90 140 240 370 540 940 1470 2090 *Approximately 6 ft. per second inlet velocity All Spirovents fabricated and stamped in accordance with ASME Section VIII, Division 1 for unfi red pressure vessels. Standard rating is 150 psi at 270°F. Consult local sales o ce for special requirements. Custom dimensions available for space limitations. Refer to High Velocity models for higher fl ows and web site Submittal Data for models up to 36”. H1 h1 OD PS e D L LF 5 3 2 1.4 1 0.8 0.6 0.4 0.3 0.2 0.14 0.1 0.08 0.06 0.04 Pr e s s u r e D r o p ( F e e t o f H e a d ) 1 2 3 4 5 6 Water Velocity at Inlet Nozzle (Feet/sec) 10” 8” 6” 5” 4” 3” 12” 2” 2.5” A SPIRO ENTERPRISES COMPANY Spirotherm, Inc. 25 N. Brandon Drive Glendale Heights, IL 60139 Tel.: 630-307-2662 Fax: 630-307-3773 www.spirotherm.com E-mail: info@spirotherm.com 209 PARTS LIST PART NUMBERQTYITEM 24-Saddle Leg-V211 1 1 2 2 3 3 4 4 5 5 6 6 7 7 8 8 A A B B C C D D TITLE:REF. TO: STANDARD TANK DATE: DWG BY: LEGEND: ID - (QTY, OF OPENINGS) PART DESCRIPTION CAPACITY APPROX. WEIGHT 1500 HWY 117 S. GOLDSBORO, NC 27530 P: (919) 734 - 8328 F: (919) 736 - 4550 BAE SCALE: N/A10/18/2022 SIGNED APPROVAL 24-Saddle Leg 0 0 0 8 lbmass `5% n24.00 14.625 2.81 5.00 16.00 .1345 10 GA .176 7 GA .1345 10 GAn.51 n.51 3.004.00 1.09 .625 2.00 11.92 EOA PART # TS-24 /Turner 210 PART#WEIGHTVOLUME GALLONS DIAMETER DIA LENGTH TL VENT A DRAIN B CENTER OF IN/ OUT DIMENSION C D ASME CHILL WATER BUFFER TANKS Description: Chill Water Buffer Tanks Specifications: Built to ASME Code Section VIII National Board Registered Carbon Steel Gray Primer 150 PSI @ 400 ˚F Other Design Pressures Available -Custom Sizes also Available * Denotes Stock Units OPENINGS E 1” NPT 1.5” NPT 2” NPT / GROOVE PIPE 2.5” NPT / GROOVE PIPE 3” NPT / GROOVE PIPE 4” FLANGE / GROOVE PIPE 6” FLANGE / GROOVE PIPE 8” FLANGE / GROOVE PIPE 10” FLANGE / GROOVE PIPE 12” FLANGE / GROOVE PIPE 14” FLANGE / GROOVE PIPE 16” FLANGE / GROOVE PIPE 18” FLANGE / GROOVE PIPE 20” FLANGE / GROOVE PIPE DIA AIR VENT A F C B DRAIN D TL DIVIDER PLATE INLET E OUTLET E 8" 12" X 16" MANWAY FOR 42" DIA & GREATER *CWT-120 *CWT-200 *CWT-300 CWT-500 CWT-680 CWT-850 CWT-1040 300 lbs 513 lbs 617 lbs 1239 lbs 1507 lbs 1777 lbs 2358 lbs F 34 40 46 52 58 64 70 E 3”NPT 3”Flange 4”Flange Per Request Per Request Per Request Per Request ELBI of America, Inc. • 525 McCarty Street • Houston, TX 77029 • Tel. (713) 674-2900 • Fax (713) 674-2982 www.elbi.net elbi@elbi.net 125/150 PSI WP * Please specify Houston, TX 77032 OPTIONAL RV:42016 3" Flange RV:82017Elbi of AmEricA, inc. • 15882 Diplomatic Plaza, Suite 170, Houston, TX 77032 • Tel. (713) 674-2900 • Fax (713) 674-2982 www.elbi.net • elbi@elbi.net 211 ADD FLUID AXIOM 36.2 in. [918mm] 29.25 IN. 743 MM 12.00 in. [305mm] 12.00 in. [305mm] FNPT SYSTEM CONNECTION SS-SF-300-01212 Submittal Data PROJECT: REPRESENTATIVE: ENGINEER: CONTRACTOR: UNIT TAG: TYPE OF SERVICE: SUBMITTED BY: APPROVED BY: ORDER NO.: QUANTITY: DATE: DATE: DATE: Product photo could vary from the actual product UPS 50-240 F UPS is a three-speed circulator pump designed for heating and air-conditioning systems and is also used for central and district heating systems. The pump provides reliable and maintenance-free operation. Conditions of Service Flow:24.6 US gpm Head:59.16 ft Efficiency:24.6 % Liquid:Propylene Glycol Temperature:42 °F NPSH required:32.81 ft Specific Gravity:1.052 Pump Data Liquid temperature range:14 .. 248 °F Maximum ambient temperature:104 °F Pipe connection:GF 50 Product number:96402882 Motor Data Max. power input:1700 W Rated voltage:208-230 V Main frequency:60 Hz Enclosure class:X4D Thermal protection:external H [ft] 0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55 60 65 Q [US gpm]0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 110 120 130 140 150 160 170 eta [%] 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 UPS 50-240 F, 3*230 V, 60Hz Water, 68°F Q = 24.6 US gpm H = 59.16 ft Pumped liquid = Propylene Glycol Concentration = 50 % Liquid temperature during operation = 42 °F Viscosity = 12.8 cSt Density = 65.51 lb/ft³ Eff pump+mtr = 24.6 % P1 [kW] 0 0.5 1.0 1.5 2.0 2.5 P1 = 1.172 kW 1/6 213 Submittal Data 3 4 6.69" NPT 1/4 5.75" 9.88"2.95" 13.80" M12 0. 5 5 " 5.98" 5.00" 2.05" 4.76" 3.74"2.95" 14 . 0 0 " 7. 0 1 " 4.17" 3. 5 4 1 / 1 6 17a 17 100 172 163a 72a 163b 163e Materials: Pump housing:Cast iron Pump housing:ASTM 35 B - 40 B Impeller:Stainless steel Impeller:AISI 304 Impeller:EN 1.4301 2/6 214 Company name: Created by: Phone: Date:2/21/2023 Printed from Grundfos Product Center [2023.07.003] Count Description 1 UPS 50-240 F Product photo could vary from the actual product Product No.:96402882 The pump is of the canned rotor type, i.e. pump and motor form an integral unit without shaft seal and with only two gaskets for sealing. The bearings are lubricatd by the pumped liquid. In order to avoid problems in connection with disposal, great importance has been attached to using as few different materials as possible. The pump is characterized by: *3 speed motor. *Ceramic radial bearings. *Carbon axial bearing. *Stainless steel rotor can, bearing plate and rotor cladding. *Aluminium alloy stator housing. *Cast iron pump housing. *Stator with built-in thermal switch. The motor is a 3-phase motor. The pump is supplied with a standard module in the terminal box. The standard module is to be connected to the mains supply via external contactor. Controls: Relay:without relay Liquid: Pumped liquid:Propylene Glycol Liquid temperature range:14 .. 248 °F Concentration:50 % Selected liquid temperature:42 °F Density:65.51 lb/ft³ Kinematic viscosity:12.8 cSt Technical: Actual calculated flow:24.6 US gpm Resulting head of the pump:59.16 ft Approvals:CCSAUS Materials: Pump housing:Cast iron EN 1561 EN-GJL-250 ASTM 35 B - 40 B Impeller:Stainless steel EN 1.4301 AISI 304 Installation: Range of ambient temperature:32 .. 104 °F Maximum operating pressure:145.04 psi Type of connection:DIN 3/6 215 Company name: Created by: Phone: Date:2/21/2023 Printed from Grundfos Product Center [2023.07.003] Count Description 1 Pipe connection:GF 50 Pressure rating for connection:PN 10 Port-to-port length:14 in Electrical data: Power input in speed 1:1.5422 HP Power input in speed 2:1300 W Max. power input:1700 W Main frequency:60 Hz Rated voltage:3 x 208-230 V Current in speed 1:3.5 A Current in speed 2:3.95 A Current in speed 3:5.3 A Cos phi in speed 1:0.82 Cos phi in speed 2:0.83 Cos phi:0.81 Enclosure class (IEC 34-5):X4D Insulation class (IEC 85):H Built-in motor protection:CONTACT Winding resistance:7.8 - 10.2 ohm Others: Terminal box position:1.30H Net weight:60.6 lb Gross weight:72.8 lb Shipping volume:3.46 ft³ Country of origin:RS Custom tariff no.:8413.70.2005 4/6 216 Company name: Created by: Phone: Date:2/21/2023 Printed from Grundfos Product Center [2023.07.003] H [ft] 0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55 60 65 Q [US gpm]0 20 40 60 80 100 120 140 160 eta [%] 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 UPS 50-240 F, 3*230 V, 60Hz Water, 68°F Q = 24.6 US gpm H = 59.16 ft Pumped liquid = Propylene Glycol Concentration = 50 % Viscosity = 12.8 cSt Density = 65.51 lb/ft³ Eff pump+mtr = 24.6 % Liquid temperature during operation = 42 °F P1 [kW] 0 0.5 1.0 1.5 2.0 2.5 P1 = 1.172 kW Description Value General information: Product name:UPS 50-240 F Product No.:96402882 EAN:5700390684907 Technical: Speed Number:3 Actual calculated flow:24.6 US gpm Resulting head of the pump:59.16 ft Maximum head:78.74 ft Approvals:CCSAUS Model:C Materials: Pump housing:Cast iron Pump housing:EN 1561 EN-GJL-250 Pump housing:ASTM 35 B - 40 B Impeller:Stainless steel Impeller:EN 1.4301 Impeller:AISI 304 Installation: Range of ambient temperature:32 .. 104 °F Maximum operating pressure:145.04 psi Type of connection:DIN Pipe connection:GF 50 Pressure rating for connection:PN 10 Port-to-port length:14 in Connect code:F Liquid: Pumped liquid:Propylene Glycol Liquid temperature range:14 .. 248 °F Concentration:50 % Selected liquid temperature:42 °F Density:65.51 lb/ft³ Kinematic viscosity:12.8 cSt Electrical data: Power input in speed 1:1.5422 HP Power input in speed 2:1300 W Max. power input:1700 W Main frequency:60 Hz Rated voltage:3 x 208-230 V Current in speed 1:3.5 A Current in speed 2:3.95 A Current in speed 3:5.3 A Cos phi in speed 1:0.82 Cos phi in speed 2:0.83 Cos phi:0.81 Enclosure class (IEC 34-5):X4D Insulation class (IEC 85):H Built-in motor protection:CONTACT Thermal protec:external Winding resistance:7.8 - 10.2 ohm Controls: Relay:without relay Others: Terminal box position:1.30H Net weight:60.6 lb Gross weight:72.8 lb Shipping volume:3.46 ft³ Country of origin:RS Custom tariff no.:8413.70.2005 5/6 217 Company name: Created by: Phone: Date:2/21/2023 Printed from Grundfos Product Center [2023.07.003] Product number:96402882 Type:UPS 50-240 F Quantity:1 Flow:24.6 US gpm ( +3%) Head:59.16 ft ( +6%) Power P1:1.172 kW Eff pump:37.2 % Eff pump+mtr:24.6 % =Eta pump * Eta motor Consumption:7021 kWh/Year CO2 emission:0 lb/Year Price:On request Load profile 1 2 3 4 Flow (%) 100 75 50 25 Flow (US gpm)24 18 12 5.99 Head (%)106 107 108 109 Head (ft)59.26 59.96 60.54 60.96 P1 (kW)1.165 1.101 1.037 0.973 Eff total (%)24.1 19.4 13.8 7.4 Time (h/a) 410 1026 2394 3010 Consumption (kWh/Year)478 1130 2483 2929 Quantity 1 1 1 1 Installation and Input Sizing results Pump curve Dimensional drawing 34 6. 6 9 " NP T 1 / 4 5. 7 5 " 9. 8 8 " 2. 9 5 " 13 . 8 0 " M1 2 0.55" 5. 9 8 " 5. 0 0 " 2. 0 5 " 4. 7 6 " 3. 7 4 " 2. 9 5 " 14.00" 7.01" 4. 1 7 " 3.5 4 1/16 H [ft] 0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55 60 65 Q [US gpm]0 20 40 60 80 100 120 140 160 eta [%] 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 UPS 50-240 F, 3*230 V, 60Hz Water, 68°F Q = 24.6 US gpm H = 59.16 ft Pumped liquid = Propylene Glycol Concentration = 50 % Liquid temperature during operation = 42 °F Viscosity = 12.8 cSt Density = 65.51 lb/ft³ Eff pump+mtr = 24.6 % P1 [kW] 0 0.5 1.0 1.5 2.0 2.5 P1 = 1.172 kW 6/6 218 Pitkin County Mailing List of 300 Feet Radius Pitkin County GIS presents the information and data on this web site as a service to the public. Every effort has been made to ensure that the information and data contained in this electronic system is accurate, but the accuracy may change. The information maintained by the County may not be complete as to mineral estate ownership and that information should be determined by separate legal and property analysis. Pitkin County GIS makes no warranty or guarantee concerning the completeness, accuracy, or reliability of the content at this site or at other sites to which we link. Assessing accuracy and reliability of information and data is the sole responsibility of the user. The user understands he or she is solely responsible and liable for use, modification, or distribution of any information or data obtained on this web site. This document contains a Mailing List formatted to be printed on Avery 5160 Labels. If printing, DO NOT "fit to page" or "shrink oversized pages." This will manipulate the margins such that they no longer line up on the labels sheet. Print actual size. From Parcel: 273512438005 on 04/18/2024 Instructions: Disclaimer: http://www.pitkinmapsandmore.com Exhibit L 219 100 EAST MAIN STREET CONDO ASSOC ASPEN, CO 81611 100 E MAIN ST 114 EAST BLEEKER STREET ASSOC ASPEN, CO 81611 COMMON AREA 114 E BLEEKER ST 120 EAST MAIN PARTNERS LLC ASPEN, CO 81611 120 E MAIN ST 123 WEST END LLC ROSS, CA 94957 67 POPLAR AVE #121 134 E BLEEKER LLC ASPEN , CO 81611 415 LACET LN 1543 LLC DENVER, CO 80202 1543 WAZEE ST #400 201 EAST MAIN STREET LLC ASPEN, CO 81611 625 E MAIN ST UNIT 102B #401 202 E MAIN ST LLC NASHVILLE, TN 37204 1138 BROOKMEADE DR 203 E HALLAM LLC ASPEN, CO 81611 101 S MILL ST # 200 208 MAIN STREET CONDO OWNERS ASSOCIATION ASPEN, CO 81611 208 E MAIN ST #102 209 EAST BLEEKER LLC PACIFIC PALISADES, CA 90272 1600 SAN REMO DR 227 EAST MAIN LLC ASPEN, CO 81611 312 AABC #D 232 EAST MAIN STREET LLC ASPEN, CO 81611 625 E MAIN ST UNIT 102B #401 ASPEN COMM UNITED METHODIST CHURCH ASPEN, CO 81611 200 E BLEEKER ST ASPEN CORNER OFFICE LLC ASPEN, CO 81611 200 E MAIN ST B G & N ASPEN LLC ASPEN, CO 81612 PO BOX 1045 CARVER RUTH A REV TRUST ASPEN, CO 81611 116 S ASPEN ST CITY OF ASPEN ASPEN, CO 81611 427 RIO GRANDE PL CRAWFORD RANDALL & ABIGAIL ASPEN, CO 81611 124 N GARMISCH ST DIRE WOLF LLC ASPEN, CO 81611 100 E MAIN ST # 1 DOMINGUE FAMILY TRUST WINTER PARK, FL 32790 PO BOX 2293 EGGHEAD LLC ASPEN, CO 81611 180 HEATHER LN ELLERMAN JEFFREY S & PAMELA C DALLAS, TX 75205 4012 MIRAMAR AVE FLEMING KIMBERLY PAIGE ASPEN, CO 81612 PO BOX 2869 FRENCH ROAD LLC ASPEN, CO 81611 312 AABC #D GARCIA STEVEN J ASPEN, CO 81611 120 N GARMISCH GSW FAMILY INV LP LANCASTER, PA 17601 1320 HUNSICKER RD HALLAM MANAGEMENT LLC CHICAGO, IL 60614 2219 N DAYTON AVE HANOVER ASPEN LLC WOODY CREEK, CO 81656 PO BOX 481 HAYMAX LODGING LLC ASPEN, CO 81611 605 W MAIN ST #2 220 HERRON LLC HOUSTON, TX 77006 1627 SOUTH BLVD HODES ALAN & DEBORAH AVENTURA , FL 33180 19951 NE 39TH PLACE HOFFMAN JOHN L & SHARON R TRUST KANSAS CITY, MO 64108 411 E 63RD ST HOGUET CONDO ASSOC ASPEN, CO 81611 COMMON AREA 118 E BLEEKER ST HOGUET CONSTANCE M NEW YORK, NY 10065 333 E 68TH ST ICONIC PROPERTIES JEROME LLC HOUSTON, TX 77077 1375 ENCLAVE PKWY JBC PREFERRED PROPERTIES LLC DELRAY BEACH, FL 33483 1005 BROOKS LN KELLY BRIAN ASPEN, CO 81611 105 E BLEEKER ST KRIBS KAREN REV LIV TRUST ASPEN, CO 81612 PO BOX 9994 LE VOTAUX II CONDO ASSOC ASPEN, CO 81611 COMMON AREA 117 N MONARCH ST LORENZ KATHERINE ASPEN, CO 81611 101 BLEEKER ST #A MONARCH BUILDING LLC WOODY CREEK, CO 81656 PO BOX 126 MOUNTAIN STATE PROPERTIES LLC NAPLES, FL 34102 715 10TH ST S NUNN RONALD FAMILY LP BRENTWOOD, CA 94513 10500 BRENTWOOD BLVD OVERFLOW PAD THREE LLC ASPEN, CO 81611 101 S MILL ST #200 OVERFLOW PAD THREE LLC MOUNTAIN BROOK, AL 35223 3315 DELL RD PARDUBA JIRI ASPEN, CO 81612 116 N GARMISCH ST PEARCE BERNARD D ASPEN, CO 81611 216 E MAIN ST PEARCE RICHARD B ASPEN, CO 81611 216 E MAIN ST RODNEY JOHN W BASALT , CO 81621 20 RIVER OAKS LANE RYAN DAWN ASPEN, CO 81611 215 N GARMISCH ST SILVER INN LLC COMPTON, CA 90220 401 W ARTESIA BLVD TARVER CHARLES ASPEN, CO 81611 128 N GARMISCH TIRPAK BRADLEY ASPEN, CO 81611 101 BLEEKER ST #A VICTORIANS AT BLEEKER CONDO ASSOC ASPEN, CO 81611 101 E BLEEKER ST WHITMAN RANDALL A MIAMI BEACH, FL 331404230 2817 LAKE AVE 221 4,800 800.0 Legend 1: WGS_1984_Web_Mercator_Auxiliary_Sphere Feet0800.0400.00 Notes Pitkin Maps & More THIS MAP IS FOR INFORMATIONAL PURPOSES. Pitkin County GIS makes no warranty or guarantee concerning the completeness, accuracy, or reliability of the content represented. Map Created on 2:53 PM 04/18/24 at http://www.pitkinmapsandmore.com State Highway Road Centerline 4K Primary Road Secondary Road Service Road Town Boundary Federal Land Boundary BLM State of Colorado USFS 222