HomeMy WebLinkAboutagenda.apz.20241001AGENDA
ASPEN PLANNING & ZONING
COMMISSION
October 1, 2024
4:30 PM, Pearl Pass Meeting Room
3rd Floor, 427 Rio Grande Pl,
Aspen
I.ROLL CALL
II.COMMENTS
III.MINUTES
III.A Draft Minutes 8-6-24
IV.DECLARATION OF CONFLICT OF INTEREST
V.PUBLIC HEARINGS
V.A 10 Club Circle - Maroon Creek Club - Minor PD Amendment to Detailed Review
VI.OTHER BUSINESS
VII.BOARD REPORTS
VIII.ADJOURN
minutes.apz.20240806.pdf
Memo 10 Club Circle_Minor Amend to Detailed Review.pdf
P&Z Resolution No. XXX Series 2024_Maroon Creek Club.pdf
Exhibit A Minor Amendment to Detailed Review Approval Criteria.pdf
Exhibit B Commercial Design Review Criteria.pdf
Exhibit C Growth Management Quota System Review Criteria.pdf
Exhibit D MCC Application.pdf
TYPICAL PROCEEDING FORMAT FOR ALL PUBLIC HEARINGS
1) Conflicts of Interest (handled at beginning of agenda) 2) Provide proof of legal notice
(affidavit of notice for PH) 3) Staff presentation 4) Board questions and clarifications of
staff 5) Applicant presentation 6) Board questions and clarifications of applicant 7) Public
comments 8) Board questions and clarifications relating to public comments 9) Close
public comment portion of bearing 10) Staff rebuttal/clarification of evidence presented by
applicant and public comment 11) Applicant rebuttal/clarification End of fact finding.
Deliberation by the commission commences. No further interaction between commission
1
1
and staff, applicant or public 12) Chairperson identified the issues to be discussed among
commissioners. 13) Discussion between commissioners* 14) Motion* *Make sure the
discussion and motion includes what criteria are met or not met Revised January 9, 2021
2
2
REGULAR MEETING ASPEN PLANNING & ZONING COMMISSION AUGUST 6, 2024
Commissioners in attendance: Ken Canfield, Tom Gorman, Teraissa McGovern, Christine Benedetti,
Marcus Blue, Charlie Tarver. Eric Knight entered at 4:32.
Staff present:
Jeffrey Barnhill, Planner I
Sophie Varga, Planner I
Kate Johnson, Assistant City Attorney
Tracy Terry, Deputy City Clerk
Commissioner Comments: Mr. Canfield asked where we are with setting up a session with Council. Ms.
Johnson replied that she will work with staff to get a date on the calendar for a work session.
Staff Comments: None.
Public Comments: None.
Minutes: Mr. Gorman motioned to approve the minutes from April 16th and the motion was seconded
by Mr. Canfield. Ms. McGovern asked for a roll call vote.
Roll call vote: Mr. Traver, abstained; Mr. Blue, yes: Mr. Knight, yes; Mr. Canfield, yes; Mr. Gorman, yes;
Ms. Benedetti, yes; Ms. McGovern, yes. Motion passes 6-0.
Mr. Gorman motioned to approve the minutes from May 7th and the motion was seconded by Mr.
Knight. Ms. McGovern asked for a roll call vote.
Roll call vote: Mr. Tarver, abstained; Mr. Blue, yes: Mr. Knight, yes; Mr. Canfield, abstained; Gorman,
abstained; Ms. Benedetti, abstained; Ms. McGovern, yes. Motion passes 3-0.
Disclosure of Conflicts of Interest: None.
Submission of Public Notice for Agenda Items: Ms. Johnson said that notice remains valid on the first
item and the second item required no noticing.
Public Hearing: 331-338 Midland Avenue-Aspen Hills-Growth Management Quota System, Multi-
Family Residential Design Standards, Transportation and Parking Review, continued from 7-16
Ms. Johnson asked for a confirmation on the record that the commissions not in attendance at the last
meeting have listened to the minutes from the 7-16 meeting and have reviewed that complete packet
including the agenda, power points, and public comment.
Ms. Benedetti, yes; Mr. Blue, yes; Mr. Tarver, yes.
Staff Presentation: Jeff Barnhill, Planner I
Mr. Barnhill gave a brief overview of the project.
3
REGULAR MEETING ASPEN PLANNING & ZONING COMMISSION AUGUST 6, 2024
Board Questions:
Mr. Blue asked what the current units there are categorized as and are there any rules that they must be
replaced in exactly the same category. Mr. Barnhill replied that in the code, replacement and demolition
of multifamily housing it specifies that the applicants can do RO or a lesser category for the units that are
replaced and does not specify if they have to a specific category. He said he believes that APCHA
recommended that they be a lesser category than RO but the code does not specify.
Mr. Knight asked if there is any price cap on the RO units. Mr. Barnhill replied that he is not 100% but as
far as he knows RO means that someone works the required number of hours within the County. Mr.
Knight replied that it is confusing because he lives in Smuggler Park, which is RO, and there are places for
sale for three million dollars. Ms. Johnson replied that her understanding is that if it is deed restricted as
RO there is not a price cap, but APCHA is not present today. There are employment restrictions.
Applicant Presentation: Chris Bendon, Bendon Adams
Mr. Bendon introduced Dave Lavis, Theresa May, and the design team. He gave a brief overview of the
information given at the last meeting. He said to his knowledge there not a limit on what the units can
sell for on the first transfer, then there is a price cap. It is probably more limiting than Eric’s experience in
Smuggler as it is a RO light and has very limited set of regulations. There is a limitation on the rental rate
that can be charged on rentals and occupants need to be qualified working local residents. There are
eight RO units, three of the eleven Affordable units are category 4 units so those are clearly price capped
and rent capped.
Board Questions:
Ms. Benedetti asked if Mr. Bendon is aware of any other developments in town have a 50/50 split
between deed restricted and free market units. Mr. Bendon replied the the requirement is not 50/50,
the requirements are that the replacement requirements are the same number of bedrooms, square
footage and units.
Ms. Benedetti rephrased her question stating she didn’t mean 50/50 in number of units but in ownership
where there are eleven deed restricted owners and eleven free market. Mr. Bendon replied that there
are and APCHA requires a separate HOA for the free market and the deed restricted units.
Mr. Tarver asked if all the numbers are correct and if they have been checked. Mr. Barnhill replied yes.
Mr. Canfield asked what the response to the public comment about shading at the last meeting. Mr.
Bendon replied that they are not a planned development, so those matters are not on the table. They
are relying on the RMF zone district and its dimensions.
Public Comment:
Jeff Bestick, 301 Midland Park Pl, said the commission got the letter from the Midland Park board and
that covers everything they are concerned about. He said RO is not affordable housing and if they decide
to approve this project, he urges them to add a completion bond, so it does not sit empty for five years
like the Werning project.
Ann Marie McFee, 401 Midland Park Pl, was involved in the letter given yesterday. We are an employee
housing neighborhood; we have a lot of families and a lot of kids. It is a busy intersection and when you
4
REGULAR MEETING ASPEN PLANNING & ZONING COMMISSION AUGUST 6, 2024
add shading, parking and snow melt it will become more dangerous. The impacts from this will be
pushed onto our neighborhood. One spot per unit is not realistic. The goals of the community plan
emphasize the community, not profit, so that they fit in the neighborhood. We will feel physical and
economic impact and so will the City of Aspen.
Kari Brooks, 112 Midland Park Pl, said she lives directly across from the site and the density is already
tight. She is concerned about adding that many more units. There is constant traffic, no sidewalks, and
we are a corridor for tourists and locals and there are a lot of blind corners. She doesn’t know if there is
a way of managing traffic but adding to it will not help. It is a wildlife corridor. This winter there was a
short-term renter and constant downtowners in the neighborhood. She agrees with Jeff and AnnMarie
as well about the Aspen Community Plan.
Judy Wender, 810 Midland Park Pl, wants to reiterate that she agrees with everything said. She said even
though things are to code, the impact on the neighborhood is very important. The building will be higher
than anything in the neighborhood, there are glass stairwells that will be facing our units and rooftop
decks. She asked that they consider the impacts of the neighborhood.
Ms. Johnson read public comment into the record from Midland Park HOA.
Staff Rebuttal: none
Applicant Response:
Mr. Bendon replied that RO is affordable housing according to the City of Aspen and APCHA. He said this
is not a design review and they are obligated to meet the city’s lighting code and snow removal
regulations. He said you have discretion within the criteria before you for this review and that may not
be as broad of latitude the neighbors want you to have. The Aspen Area Community Plan is not a
regulatory document, it is an aspirational document that set out community goals and aspirations. It sets
forth a resource for P&Z and City Council to pursue legislation but is not a regulatory document.
Board Questions:
Mr. Tarver said when they said “plans can be changed” what does that look like. Mr. Bendon said to do
that they have to provide a full set of architectural plans, if they want to change something in those
plans it would be reviewed by the building department in a building review. There is a certain amount of
flexibility that is expected as a project goes from conceptual to building plans that will be used in
construction.
Board Discussion:
Mr. Canfield said his understanding of their role is to analyze this application according to the criteria on
the screen. According to staff all the criteria have been met and he hasn’t heard anything from the public
that shows that staff is incorrect. He said they did a good job of weaving through the design criteria to
make this project. It is his view that they should approve the project. He has given serious thought to all
the public comment and a lot of them are the kinds of problems we all have all the time. We should be
looking at the code to deal with these problems. The one problem with this project that stands out is
5
REGULAR MEETING ASPEN PLANNING & ZONING COMMISSION AUGUST 6, 2024
parking, which is a potential mess in the making. He said they do not have the ability to require but
could possibly recommend that the parking mitigation payment could be spent in the Midland corridor.
He is going to approve the application with that recommendation.
Mr. Gorman said thanks to everyone who came to the meetings. This highlights the big gap in the code
and personal experience. It meets the code but is flawed in that it will affect the neighborhood
negatively in several ways. He finds himself in the position of not being able to say no and will approve
with many reservations and hopes council will take up these considerations in the code.
Mr. Blue said that Ken summed it up. He has his own thoughts having walked the neighborhood. The
AACP doesn’t have any teeth to it so while I may agree with the vast majority of what is in there they
have to stick to the code, and it meets the code.
Ms. Benedetti said she used to live in this building and is aware of the neighborhood concerns. These are
hard conversations to have. She is an advocate for affordable housing so feels that she has to support
more housing. These are issues affecting all neighborhoods in Aspen. She will approve.
Mr. Knight said the boxes are checked and it follows code. Staff said they feel like its aligned with the
AACP and feels it does not. He will vote against as it does not meet the AACP.
Ms. McGovern said a lot of her issues have been voiced by other commissioners. A lot of people in this
room have affordable housing and we need to give others that opportunity. It ’s hard to approve a project
that feels really big, but she does not see a way to deny the project. She will vote to approve.
Mr. Tarver said nobody likes their neighborhood to change. The rooftop decks are just like patios but on
the roof. There is the AACP and then there is the law. Don’t leave here and not doing anything about
changing the code. Back in the day it was offered to make the street one way and no one in the
neighborhood wanted it. He said you’re getting your approval, be nice.
Ms. McGovern asked Ms. Johnson if they can make suggestions for the spending of the mitigation
money. Ms. Johnson said they can make a recommendation, but conditions of approval are conditions
the applicant has to meet and you would be asking the city to do something. She would advise that staff
can convey that desire.
Mr. Canfield said he was not wanting a condition of approval but a recommendation to council. Ms
Johnson will work on talking to city officials about that.
Mr. Tarver asked if Midland is being redone in 2025 and can they express the money be used on that
project. Ms. Johnson said they can express that desire to city council and city departments.
Ms. McGovern asked if they could take into consideration the AACP. Ms Johnson said there is GMQS
before them and the purpose of that was to align with the AACP. She cannot dictate they vote one way
or the other but can disagree with staff findings.
Motion:
Mr. Gorman moved to approve resolution 5 series 2024; Mr. Blue seconded.
Roll call vote: Mr. Tarver, yes; Mr. Blue, yes; Mr. Knight, no; Mr. Canfield, yes; Mr. Gorman, yes; Ms.
Benedetti, yes; Ms. McGovern, yes; Motion passes 6-1.
6
REGULAR MEETING ASPEN PLANNING & ZONING COMMISSION AUGUST 6, 2024
OTHER BUSINESS: Fee in lieu payment for 1295 Red Butte Dr.
Staff presentation: Sophie Varga, Planner I
Ms. Varga stated that the GMQS chapter was opened by council via policy resolution last month and part
of that is to examine the credits program. Tonight, there is one project requesting to pay fee in lieu for a
project at 1235 Red Butte. Staff has found that the request meets criteria and recommends approval.
Application presentation: Ryan Walterscheid, Forum Phi
Mr. Walterscheid said they tried to acquire housing credits but were unable to find any.
Board Questions: none
Board Discussion: none
Motion:
Mr. Blue moved to approve resolution 6 series 2024; Mr. Gorman seconded.
Roll call vote: Mr. Tarver, yes; Mr. Blue, yes; Mr. Knight, yes; Mr. Canfield, yes; Mr. Gorman, yes; Ms.
Benedetti, yes; Ms. McGovern, yes; Motion passes 7-0.
Ms. Johnson asked if they would like to schedule a work session for September 3rd. There will be enough
members for a quorum.
They discussed what P&Z is allowed to do or not and some topics that may be discussed in a work
session.
Adjourn:
Mr. Canfield motioned to adjourn; Mr. Gorman seconded. All in favor.
Tracy Terry, Deputy City Clerk
7
Page 1 of 5
MEMORANDUM
TO: City of Aspen Planning and Zoning Commission
FROM: Sammi Montalto, AICP, Planner I
THRU: Ben Anderson, Community Development Director
MEMO DATE: September 20, 2024
MEETING DATE: October 1, 2024
RE: Maroon Creek Club PD, Minor Amendment to Detailed Review Approval
APPLICANT:
Maroon Creek Club LLC, 10 Club
Circle, Aspen, CO 81611
REPRESENTATIVE:
Chris Bendon, BendonAdams, 300
S. Spring St. #202, Aspen, CO
81611
LOCATION:
Lot 51 Clubhouse & Facilities,
Maroon Creek Club Subdivision
CURRENT AND PROPOSED
ZONING & USE
This property is located in the Park
(P) zone district with a Planned
Development (PD) overlay and is
developed as the Maroon Creek Club
PD. The proposed uses will
remaining consistent with what is
existing at the clubhouse, with some
renovations to various parts of the
structure.
SUMMARY: The applicant, Maroon Creek Club, is a golf, residential,
lodging, and commercial project that spans across multiple parcels
both north and south of Highway 82. The applicant requests a Minor
Amendment to a Detailed Review approval for an update and
renovation of the clubhouse. There are several components to this
project, including: adding three outdoor canopies to the exterior,
expanding the gym by enclosing an outdoor terrace, expanding the
guest services kitchen, and installing observation decks over the
indoor tennis courts.
STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends the Planning and
Zoning Commission adopt the Resolution to approve the Minor
Amendment to a Detailed Review approval as proposed.
Figure 1. Maroon Creek Club Lot 51: Clubhouse | Aerial Image
8
Page 2 of 5
LAND USE REQUEST AND REVIEW PROCEDURES:
The Applicant is requesting the following land use approval from the Planning and Zoning Commission:
• Minor Amendment to Project Review Approval (Pursuant to Land Use Code Section 26.445.110):
An application requesting approval to make changes and upgrades to the Maroon Creek
Clubhouse, which requires Review by the Planning and Zoning Commission. The Planning and
Zoning Commission is the final review body.
SUMMARY OF PROJECT:
Existing Conditions: The Maroon Creek Club PD encompasses a large area of ; but this application only
pertains to Lot 51 and the residing clubhouse, visible in Figure 1 above. The clubhouse sits on Lot 51 of
the planned development at 10 Club Circle. The building’s current commercial floor area is 64,280 square
feet. The entrance and pro shop are currently undergoing renovations that have been previously approved.
The Planned Development was awarded an additional 30,100 square feet of commercial space under
BoCC Resolution No. 91-111.
Through Pitkin County approvals from 1991 and 1992, commercial GMQS allotments were acquired for
the additional commercial space. As of today, after other various additions have been approved and spent
most of that 30,100, a remaining 8,319 square feet of commercial space is still allowable and unbuilt at the
Maroon Creek Clubhouse.
Proposed Changes: The clubhouse at Maroon Creek Club has a few different changes proposed within
this application. On the exterior, three different covered areas are proposed. This includes an outdoor
dining terrace, an outdoor fitness area, and an event space south of the clubhouse near the pool. Two
separate expansions of the building are proposed: the gym and the guest services kitchen. Finally, the
only fully internal addition is the observation decks for the tennis courts. Again, Maroon Creek Club has
8,319 square feet of floor area to work with and will be spending it on each of these components of the
remodel. The following table lists the previous floor area allowances and where some of it was spent, as
well as the proposed additions from this current application.
Table 1. Floor Area Allowances and Redemptions – Past and Proposed
Floor Area Change Square
Footage
Total Allowable Floor Area 30,888
Total Used in previous additions -22,569
Remaining Allowable Floor Area 8,319
Restaurant Dining Trellis 1,399
Covered Fitness Area 556
Event Space 1,080
Gym Expansion 2,434
Guest Services Kitchen Expansion 1,004
Observation Bridges 1,846
Total Proposed Expansion 8,319
9
Page 3 of 5
Figure 2. Outdoor Dining Terrace
The outdoor dining trellis will cover the exterior patio in three different sections, as shown above, that will
total 1,399 square feet. The portion of these areas that is counted toward floor area is any area that extends
more than ten feet from the edge of the building. This language is from the Maroon Creek Club PD
agreements as passed down from Pitkin County code, not the City’s Land Use Code. The proposed dining
trellis will have a metal structural frame and a louvered roof system that can be opened and closed. The
patio will be slightly expanded to accommodate the structural frame, with the southern portion changed
from curvilinear edges to linear. After the floor are from these trellises are subtracted, Maroon Creek Club
is left with 6,920 square feet of floor area for the rest of the project.
Figure 3. Covered Fitness Area
The covered fitness area is another outdoor space that will
be covered with a weather-shielding canopy. This area is
dedicated for outdoor fitness and yoga classes, and the
canopy will allow these classes to take place in various
weather conditions. The covered fitness area will count
toward floor area in the same way that the above trellis
will; only the area past 10 feet from the edge of the building
will count. In this case, 556 square feet of floor area will be
claimed by this covering. The clubhouse now has 6,364
square feet of floor area remaining.
10
Page 4 of 5
Figure 4. Event Space
The last outdoor covered area is the proposed
event space near the pool. This area will not have
any floor area exemption like the above two
because it is not an extension of the structure and
is completely separate from it. This event space
will be used for the various events hosted at
Maroon Creek Club annually. Maroon Creek Club
currently mitigates for various temporary
structures used every year, and this permanent
covering will allow them to use floor area they have
already mitigated for instead of continuing to
mitigate every year for tents that serve the same
purpose. The event space will claim 1,080 square
feet of the remaining floor area leaving 5,284
square feet in the bank.
Figure 5. Gym Expansion
Now, we move on to the more substantial additions
to the building. The expansion to the gym will
enclose an outdoor terrace adjacent to the current
gym. According to representatives at the club, the
terrace is rarely utilized but the interior gym can get
overcrowded during peak hours. Enclosing this
space will better accommodate the needs of the
club’s fitness area. While enclosing this space will
add massing to the structure, the architecture and
materials will all match what is existing, and the
footprint will not grow in size from this expansion.
Enclosing this terrace will use 2,434 square feet of
allowable floor area, so we are now left with 2,850
for the remaining components.
Figure 6. Guest Services Kitchen Expansion
The guest services kitchen is separate from the
restaurant kitchen and exclusively serves the pool
and golf services. This expansion is enclosing an
existing ground floor patio. This added bulk to the
north side of the building is facing the parking lot
with over 200 spaces and is not visible from the
street. This expansion is motivated by the need for
better functionality in this kitchen, as the needs of
service have outgrown the existing physical space.
This expansion will add 1,004 square feet of floor
area to the clubhouse, leaving the final 1,846 for
the tennis observation bridges.
11
Page 5 of 5
Figure 7. Tennis Observation Bridges
The final piece of this application is the tennis observation
bridges. These are two viewing decks that will be part of the
second floor, allowing occupants to look down on the tennis
courts on the first floor below them. This is an internal
addition and will have no impact on the exterior of the
building, meaning that no Commercial Design Guidelines are
applicable to this component of the remodel. Each bridge will
be 923 square feet, so both collectively be using Maroon
Creeks Club’s last allowable and mitigated commercial
square footage: 1,846. After this remodel, if approved,
Maroon Creek Club will have zero remaining commercial
square footage.
STAFF COMMENTS:
The application is subject to Minor Amendment of a Detailed Review Approval as it includes multiple minor
changes to the clubhouse facility. These updates are each motivated by various evolving needs of the
clubhouse space. The most drastic changes proposed are the expansions to the gym and the guest
services kitchen. These additions will add massing to an already large structure. However, the floor area
added here is still within what has already been approved for the Maroon Creek Club PD. The additions
will match the existing architectural style of the building and will comply with the City’s current building
codes. The three covered areas on the exterior of the building will allow the clubhouse to use some of that
outdoor space more comfortably during the hours of peak sun exposure. The observation decks above the
tennis courts are entirely interior and will not affect the exterior of the building in any way. These additions
can all be allowed with the extra 8,319 square feet of commercial floor area that was awarded to Maroon
Creek Club in 1993.
Each of the proposed changes is compliant with the relevant review criteria under our Land Use Code.
The changes are considered insubstantial and qualify for a minor amendment. The mitigation for this floor
area has already been processed and awarded to the PD. The exterior changes do not conflict with any
relevant commercial design criteria.
RECOMMENDATION: The Community Development Department Staff recommends the Planning and
Zoning Commission approve the proposed plans finding that the review criteria are met.
ATTACHMENTS:
Resolution #__, Series of 2024
Exhibit A – Minor Amendment to Detailed Review Approval Criteria
Exhibit B – Commercial Design Review Criteria
Exhibit C – Growth Management Quota System Review Criteria
Exhibit D – Application
12
P&Z Resolution # ____, Series of 2024
1
RESOLUTION #XX
(SERIES OF 2024)
A RESOLUTION OF THE ASPEN PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION
GRANTING MINOR AMENDMENT TO A DETAILED REVIEW APPROVAL FOR
THE PROPERTY LOCATED AT LOT 51, MAROON CREEK CLUB SUBDIVISION,
CITY OF ASPEN, COLORADO
PARCEL ID: 2735-023-09-051
WHEREAS, the Community Development department received an application from Maroon
Creek Club LLC, requesting Minor Amendment to a Detailed Review Approval for a plan to
upgrade the clubhouse located at Lot 51, Maroon Creek Club Subdivision; and,
WHEREAS, the Community Development department Staff reviewed the application for
compliance with the applicable review standards; and,
WHEREAS, upon review of the application and the Land Use Code standards, and referral of
the application to other City Departments for comments, the Community Development Director
recommends Minor Amendment to a Detailed Review approval for the application proposed; and,
WHEREAS, the City of Aspen Planning and Zoning Commission reviewed and considered
the application under the applicable provisions of the Land Use Code as identified herein, in
particular Section 26.445.110 Planned Development Amendments, reviewed and considered the
recommendation of the Community Development Director and took and considered public
comment at a duly noticed public hearing on October 1, 2024; and,
WHEREAS, the City of Aspen Planning and Zoning Commission reviewed and considered
the application under the applicable provisions of the Land Use Code as identified herein, in
particular Section 26.412 Commercial Design Review; and,
WHEREAS, the City of Aspen Planning and Zoning Commission reviewed and considered
the application under the applicable provisions of the Land Use Code as identified herein, in
particular Section 26.470.080 Growth Management Quota System; and,
WHEREAS, the City of Aspen Planning and Zoning Commission finds that the development
proposal for Minor Amendment to a Detailed Review approval meets the applicable review criteria
and that approval of the request as described below is consistent with the goals and objectives of
the Land Use Code; and,
WHEREAS, the City of Aspen Planning and Zoning Commission finds that this Resolution
furthers and is necessary for the promotion of public health, safety, and welfare, and,
WHEREAS, the City of Aspen Planning and Zoning Commission approves Resolution #0,
Series of 2024, by a ____ to ___ (x - x) vote, recommending approval for Minor Amendment to a
Detailed Review Approval as identified herein.
13
P&Z Resolution # ____, Series of 2024
2
NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED the City of Aspen Planning and Zoning
Commission finds as follows:
Section 1: Minor Amendment to a Detailed Review Approval
The proposed changes to the Maroon Creek Clubhouse are in line with the original approvals and
meet the basic intent of the Planned Development. The Maroon Creek Club PD received approval
for the proposed commercial space via BoCC Resolution No. 91-111. The use of the clubhouse
will not change with these additions but will allow adequate room for each section to accommodate
the growing needs of the Club. The proposed dimensions will not exceed what has been previously
approved. Minor Amendment to a Detailed Review criteria have been met for a Planned
Development.
Section 2: Commercial Design Review Approval
The changes to the exterior of the clubhouse building will match the existing architectural style
and will not affect the character of the surrounding neighborhood. The materials will remain
consistent with what is existing. Commercial Design Review criteria have been met.
Section 3: Growth Management Quota System Approval
The proposed square footage to be added with this approval has already received commercial
GMQS allotments from previous approvals to allow for the floor area increase. Growth
Management Quota System review criteria have been met.
Section 4: Conditions of Approval
This project will need to meet the following conditions of approval at time of building permit
submittal:
1. The proposed development’s new impervious areas will need to meet all requirements of
the Urban Runoff Management Plan for water quality capture volume.
2. Any impacts on utilities must be reflected in a utility plan submitted for permit review.
3. The proposed changes must comply with the City of Aspen’s adopted building code in
place at the time of building permit submittal.
Section 5: Material Representations
All material representations and commitments made by the Applicant pursuant to the development
proposal approvals as herein awarded, whether in public hearing or documentation presented
before the Planning and Zoning Commission, are hereby incorporated in such site development
approvals and the same shall be complied with as if fully set forth herein, unless amended by an
authorized entity.
Section 6: Existing Litigation
This resolution shall not affect any existing litigation and shall not operate as an abatement of any
action or proceeding now pending under or by virtue of the ordinances repealed or amended as
herein provided, and the same shall be conducted and concluded under such prior ordinances.
Section 7: Severability
If any section, subsection, sentence, clause, phrase, or portion of this resolution is for any reason
held invalid or unconstitutional in a court of competent jurisdiction, such portion shall be deemed
14
P&Z Resolution # ____, Series of 2024
3
a separate, distinct and independent provision and shall not affect the validity of the remaining
portions thereof.
APPROVED by the Commission at its meeting on October 1, 2024.
APPROVED AS TO FORM: PLANNING AND ZONING
COMMISSION:
___________________________________ ________________________
Katharine Johnson, Assistant City Attorney Teraissa McGovern, Chair
ATTEST:
____________________________
Tracy Terry, Records Manager
Attachment:
Exhibit 1 – Approved Additions to the Maroon Creek Club Building
15
P&Z Resolution # ____, Series of 2024
4
Exhibit 1 – Approved Additions to the Maroon Creek Club Building
Approved Site & Floor Plan
Outdoor Dining Trellis
Existing Proposed
16
P&Z Resolution # ____, Series of 2024
5
Covered Fitness Area
Event Space
Gym Expansion
Proposed
Existing
Existing Proposed
17
P&Z Resolution # ____, Series of 2024
6
Guest Services Kitchen Expansion
Tennis Observation Bridges
Existing
Proposed
18
Exhibit A: Minor Amendment to a Planned Development Approval - Review Criteria
(e)Minor Amendment to a Detailed Review approval. An amendment found by the Community
Development Director consistent with a Project Review approval and to be generally consistent
with the allowances and limitations of a Detailed Review approval, or which otherwise represents
an insubstantial change, but which does not meet the established thresholds for an insubstantial
amendment, may be approved, approved with conditions or denied by the Planning and Zoning
Commission or the Historic Preservation Commission as applicable, pursuant to 26.445.040(b)(3)
- Step Three.
26.445.070 Detailed Review Standards
Detailed Review shall focus on the comprehensive evaluation of the specific aspects of the
development, including utility placement, and architectural materials. In the review of a
development application for Detailed Review, the Planning and Zoning Commission, or the
Historic Preservation Commission as applicable, shall consider the following:
A. Compliance with Project Review Approval. The proposed development, including all
dimensions and uses, is consistent with the Project Review approval and adequately addresses
conditions on the approval and direction received during the Project Review.
Staff Finding: The proposed changes to the Maroon Creek clubhouse are all consistent with the
previous approvals that have been granted for this Planned Development. The dimensions of the
clubhouse are increasing, but the additional floor area has already been awarded to the PD via
approvals from 1991-1996. The use of the building and the area surrounding it will remain the
same. All proposed changes are within the parameters of what has already been approved through
Pitkin County resolutions. Staff finds this criterion to be met.
B. Growth Management. The proposed development has received all required GMQS allotments,
or is concurrently seeking allotments.
Staff Finding: All GMQS allotments required for this to complete this project. Staff finds this
criterion to be met.
C. Site Planning and Landscape Architecture. The site plan is compatible with the context and
visual character of the area. In meeting this standard, the following criteria shall be used:
(1) The landscape plan exhibits a well-designed treatment of exterior spaces, preserves existing
significant vegetation, and provides an ample quantity and variety of ornamental plant species
suitable for the Aspen area climate. Vegetation removal, protection, and restoration plans shall
be acceptable to the Director of Parks and Open Space.
Staff Finding: This standard is not applicable. No changes or additions to existing vegetation
are proposed.
19
Exhibit A: Minor Amendment to a Planned Development Approval - Review Criteria
(2) Buildings and site grading provide simple, at-grade entrances and minimize extensive grade
changes along building exteriors. The project meets or exceeds the requirements of the
Americans with Disabilities Act and applicable requirements for emergency, maintenance, and
service vehicle access. Adequate snow storage is accommodated.
Staff Finding: This standard is not applicable. No changes to site grading is proposed.
(3) Energy efficiency or production features are integrated into the landscape in a manner that
enhances the site.
Staff Finding: The landscaping is not within the scope of this project. This standard is not
applicable
(4) All site lighting is proposed so as to prevent direct glare or hazardous interference of any
kind to adjoining streets or lands. All exterior lighting shall comply with the City's outdoor
lighting standards.
Staff Finding: No exterior lighting changes are proposed for this application. This standard is
not applicable.
(5) Site drainage is accommodated for the proposed development in compliance with Title 29—
Engineering Design Standards and shall not negatively impact surrounding properties.
Staff Finding: No changes to site drainage are proposed for this application. This standard is
not applicable.
D. Design Standards and Architecture. The proposed architectural details emphasize quality
construction and design characteristics. In meeting this standard, the following criteria shall be
used:
(1) The project architecture provides for visual interest and incorporates present-day details and
use of materials respectful of the community's past without attempting to mimic history.
Staff Finding: The proposed changes in this application include two separate additions to
portions of the building. These additions will be consistent with the existing exterior. The
architectural character of the building will remain the same, while being appropriately updated
for its modern needs. Staff finds this criterion to be met.
(2) Exterior materials are of a high quality, durability, and comply with applicable design
standards, including those outlined in Chapter 26.410, Residential Design Standards, Chapter
26.412, Commercial Design Standards, and Chapter 26.415, Historic Preservation.
Staff Finding: The materials will remain consistent with what is existing, including high-quality
and durable finishes that are consistent with Chapter 26.412, Commercial Design Standards. Staff
finds this criterion to be met.
20
Exhibit A: Minor Amendment to a Planned Development Approval - Review Criteria
(3) Building entrances are sited or designed to minimize icing and snow shedding effects.
Staff Finding: Any changes to building entrances will be designed with icing and snow shedding
effects in mind. Staff finds this criterion to be met.
(4) Energy efficiency or production features are integrated into structures in a manner that
enhances the architecture.
Staff Finding: The proposed additions will integrate any energy efficiency features into the new
façade in a way that enhances the architecture. Staff finds this criterion to be met.
(5) All structure lighting is proposed so as to prevent direct glare or hazardous interference of
any kind to adjoining streets or lands. All exterior lighting shall comply with the City's outdoor
lighting standards.
Staff Finding: Any and all changes to the exterior lighting fixtures will remain complaint with
the City’s updated outdoor lighting code. Staff finds this criterion to be met.
E. Common Parks, Open Space, Recreation Areas, or Facilities. If the proposed development
includes common parks, open space, recreation areas, or common facilities, a proportionate,
undivided interest is deeded in perpetuity to each lot or dwelling unit owner within the Planned
Development. An adequate assurance through a Development Agreement for the permanent care
and maintenance of open spaces, recreation areas, and shared facilities together with a
prohibition against future development is required.
Staff Finding: No open space is within the scope of this application. This standard is not
applicable.
F. Pedestrian, bicycle & transit facilities. The development improves pedestrian, bicycle, and
transit facilities. These facilities and improvements shall be prioritized over vehicular facilities
and improvements. Any new vehicular access points minimize impacts on existing pedestrian,
bicycle and transit facilities.
Any specific designs, mitigation techniques, and implementation timelines as required during
Project Review comply with the applicable requirements of the Project Review and as otherwise
required in the Land Use Code. These plans shall provide sufficient detail to determine if the
design or mitigation concept complies with the intent of the requirements and to determine any
required cost estimating for surety requirements, but do not need to be detailed construction
documents.
Staff Finding: No pedestrian, bicycle, or transit facilities are within the scope of this application.
This standard is not applicable.
G. Engineering Design Standards. There has been accurate identification of engineering design
and mitigation techniques necessary for development of the proposed subdivision to comply with
21
Exhibit A: Minor Amendment to a Planned Development Approval - Review Criteria
the applicable requirements of Municipal Code Title 29—Engineering Design Standards and the
City of Aspen Urban Runoff Management Plan (URMP).
Any specific designs, mitigation techniques, and implementation timelines as required during
Project Review comply with the applicable requirements of Municipal Code Title 29—
Engineering Design Standards and the City of Aspen Urban Runoff Management Plan (URMP).
These plans shall provide sufficient detail to determine if the design or mitigation concept
complies with the intent of the requirements, but do not need to be detailed construction
documents.
Staff Finding: The proposed updates will comply with Title 29 – Engineering Design Standards.
Staff finds this criterion to be met.
H. Public Infrastructure and Facilities. The proposed Planned Development shall upgrade
public infrastructure and facilities necessary to serve the project. Improvements shall be at the
sole costs of the developer.
Any specific designs, mitigation techniques, and implementation timelines as required during
Project Review comply with the applicable requirements of Municipal Code Title 29—
Engineering Design Standards and the City of Aspen Urban Runoff Management Plan (URMP).
These plans shall provide sufficient detail to determine if the design or mitigation concept
complies with the intent of the requirements, but do not need to be detailed construction
documents.
Staff Finding: No additional resources, infrastructure or facilities are necessary for the proposed
facility updates. This standard is not applicable.
I. Phasing of development plan. If phasing of the development plan is proposed, each phase shall
be designed to function as a complete development and shall not be reliant on subsequent phases.
Phasing shall insulate, to the extent practical, occupants of initial phases from the construction
of later phases. All necessary or proportionate improvements to public facilities, payment of
impact fees and fees-in-lieu, construction of any facilities to be used jointly by residents of the
Planned Development, construction of any required affordable housing, and any mitigation
measures shall be completed concurrent or prior to the respective impacts associated with the
phase.
Staff Finding: Phasing is not requested for this application. This standard is not applicable.
22
Exhibit B: Commercial Design Review - Review Criteria
Sec. 26.412.060. - Review Criteria. An application for commercial design review may be
approved, approved with conditions or denied based on conformance with the following criteria:
(a) Guidelines and Standards.
(1) The Commercial, Lodging and Historic District Design Standards and Guidelines are met as
determined by the appropriate Commission. The Standards and Guidelines include design review
criteria that are to be used to determine whether the application is appropriate.
Staff Finding: The proposed changes will remain consistent with Commercial Design Guidelines.
The Commercial Design Standards that are within the purview of this proposal include: Building
Mass, Height, and Scale, Materials and Details, Lighting, Service, and Mechanical Areas, and
Remodel. The others (Site Planning and Streetscape, Alleyways, Parking, Street Level Design, and
Roofscape) are not relevant to the scope of this project.
The proposed additions to the mass of the building are all at separate sections of the building
façade(s) and still leave the building with a good amount of height variation. The building is not
left looking significantly bulkier than it looks now. This building is also on the outskirts of town,
where not many passersby are even able to glance at the structure.
The proposed materials are consistent with the existing palette. The result will be additions that
seamlessly blend in with the previously built sections and are just as durable.
The only additional lighting on the exterior will be integrated into the dining trellis. This lighting
will comply with the current outdoor lighting code. No changes to mechanical areas are proposed.
This remodel will keep the building’s appearance true to what is existing. The building’s character
will stay consistent, having no negative impact on the surrounding neighborhood. Staff finds this
criterion to be met.
(2) All applicable standards in the Commercial, Lodging and Historic District Design Standards
and Guidelines shall be met unless granted a Variation pursuant to Section 26.412.040(d),
Variations.
Staff Finding: No Variations are required for the proposed changes. Staff finds this criterion to
be met.
(3) Not every guideline will apply to each project, and some balancing of the guidelines must occur
on a case-by-case basis. The applicable Commission must:
a. Determine that a sufficient number of the relevant guidelines are adequately met in order to
approve a project proposal;
b. Weigh the applicable guidelines with the practicality of the measure.
23
Exhibit B: Commercial Design Review - Review Criteria
Staff Finding: All applicable guidelines are met with the proposed changes. Many of the
guidelines are not relevant due to the limited scope of this proposal, as well as the location (well
outside the core and infill area of Aspen). Staff finds this criterion to be met.
(b) Pedestrian Amenity. The proposed development meets the requirements of Section
26.412.070, Pedestrian Amenity.
Staff Finding: The underlying zone district (Park) is not subject to these requirements per Section
26.412.070.a Applicability and Requirement. This standard is not applicable.
24
Exhibit C: Growth Management Quota System - Review Criteria
26.470.150. - Amendment of a growth management development order.
(a) Insubstantial amendment. An insubstantial amendment to an approved growth management
development order may be authorized by the Community Development Director if:
1. The change conforms to all other provisions of the Land Use Code and does not exceed
approved variations to the residential design standards, require an amendment to the
commercial design review approval or such variations or amendments have been approved.
Staff Finding: No variations are required for this proposal. The relevant Commercial Design
Guidelines are met with what has been submitted. Staff finds this criterion to be met.
2. The change does not alter the number, size, type or deed restriction of the proposed
affordable housing units, subject to compliance with the Aspen/Pitkin County Housing
Authority Guidelines.
Staff Finding: The existing deed-restricted units within the Maroon Creek Club PD will all remain
the same. No additional affordable housing units are proposed at this time. None of the residential
uses are within the scope of this project. Staff finds this criterion to be met.
3. The change is limited to technical or engineering considerations discovered prior to or during
actual development that could not reasonably be anticipated during the review process or
any other minor change that the Community Development Director finds has no substantial
effect on the conditions and representations made during the original project review.
Staff Finding: The Maroon Creek Development Corporation (MCDC) acquired Growth
Management Allotments for the commercial square footage, as stated in the final approval granted
in BoCC Resolution No. 91-111 consisting of 26,100 square feet of the planned 30,100 commercial
square footage of the Pfister Ranch/Golf project. To achieve the 30,100 square foot total for the
project, the MCDC obtained the remaining 4,000 square feet in the 1991 GMQS competition via
Pitkin County Planning and Zoning Commission Resolution No. 91-79 and BoCC Resolution No.
92-5.
The SIA summarized the commercial square footage that could be added to the Grand Champions
building (now known as the Club building of the Maroon Creek Club) as consisting of 30,100
square feet, 8,000 of which was to be used for an expansion of the golf cart storage. A subsequent
administrative amendment added 788 square feet to the total commercial square footage that could
be added to the Club building. Subtracting the square footage reserved for golf cart storage, the
Club building was allowed to expand by 22,888 square feet. A 14,569 square foot expansion was
accomplished in the late 1990s leaving 8,319 square feet of commercial space that can be added
to the Club building.
25
Exhibit C: Growth Management Quota System - Review Criteria
The affordable housing obligation of this project was met though the construction of the Maroon
Creek Apartments and a single-family home near the base of the Tiehack lift, all of which are deed
restricted according to the requirements of the Aspen/Pitkin County Housing Authority.
Affordable housing mitigation for the remaining commercial square footage allowance has been
provided. The proposed additions to the Maroon Creek Clubhouse are using the square footage
identified as allowed with the above-mentioned project approvals. The commercial square footage
described in the SIA remains a development right of the applicant and the housing mitigation has
been provided.
Overall, through a sequence of several different approvals from the 1990s, as well as several other
additions and remodels, Maroon Creek Club is currently left with 8,319 square feet of commercial
space that is mitigated, but not built-out. Staff finds this criterion to be met.
26
300 SO SPRING ST | 202 | ASPEN, CO 81611
970.925.2855 | BENDONADAMS.COM
March 15, 2024
Haley Hart, AICP
Long Range Planner
City of Aspen
427 Rio Grande Place
Aspen, CO 81611
RE: Maroon Creek Club – Lot 51, Maroon Creek Club
Planned Development Amendment
Ms. Hart:
Please accept this request for an Amendment to
the Maroon Creek Club Planned Development
to accommodate several planned expansions of
the clubhouse. The proposed expansions
utilize previously granted commercial square
footage gained through the Pitkin County
Growth Management Quota System.
Affordable housing mitigation associated with
this commercial square footage was provided in
1999 through the development of the Maroon
Creek Apartments.
The above map shows the location of the Maroon
Creek Club, west of downtown Aspen
The proposed expansion consists of both interior and exterior changes to the building. An interior
expansion to accommodate observation “bridges” above the indoor tennis courts is planned. An
expansion of the gym will enclose an existing outdoor terrace. The remaining expansions are
covered, unenclosed outdoor areas to accommodate outdoor dining, outdoor fitness, and an
outdoor flex/event space. These covered areas count (partially) towards the allowable floor area.
The entire club building and these expansion areas are considered commercial.
This application responds to the Planned Development Amendment, Growth Management, and
Commercial Design Review sections of the City’s Land Use Code. Architectural changes to the
exterior of the building are proposed in the same architectural style as the current facility. The
building recently went through an architectural refresh, including changes to the entryway and
drop-off area.
27
Maroon Creek Club
PD Amendment
Page 2
300 SO SPRING ST | 202 | ASPEN, CO 81611
970.925.2855 | BENDONADAMS.COM
Background:
The Pfister Ranch/Golf project (now known as the Maroon Creek Club) is a multi-parcel golf,
residential, lodging, and commercial project originally proposed by the Maroon Creek
Development Corporation (MCDC). The project was reviewed over several years and approved
in Pitkin County through the adoption of Pitkin County Resolution No. 111 -91 granting detailed
approval and Resolution No. 93-104 granting final plat approval. Resolution 93 restated the
approvals granted by Pitkin County and became the dominant document in case of discrepancies.
A water service agreement was approved by the City of Aspen in 1993 providing the development
with municipal water.
Growth Management Allotments for the commercial square footage were obtained the MCDC, as
documented in the final detailed submission approval granted by Pitkin County via BoCC
Resolution No. 91-111 consisting of 26,100 square feet of the planned 30,100 commercial square
footage of the Pfister Ranch/Golf project1. To achieve the 30,100 square foot total for the project,
the MCDC obtained the remaining 4,000 square feet in the 1991 GMQS competition via Pitkin
County Planning and Zoning Commission Resolution No. 91-79 and BoCC Resolution No. 92-5.2
These previous growth management approvals were summarized in BoCC Resolution No. 104-
93 with a proviso that Reso 104 become a dominant document in case of discrepancies.
A Subdivision Improvements Agreement (SIA), reviewed approved by Pitkin County, was recorded
in 1993 as reception no. 363236. The SIA was recorded under Pearce Equities Group II, LLC,
which was the successor to the MCDC. The name of the project was changed to the Maroon
Creek Club. The SIA summarized and detailed the land use entitlements (referred to as the
“project approvals” in the SIA) and became the controlling document for the project, essentially
replacing the various resolutions adopted by the County for the project including Reso 104.3
A snippet of the SIA is
shown to the right
assigning dominance to
the SIA in case of a
discrepancy
1 See page 5 of BoCC Reso 91-111 summarizing prior GMQS approvals.
2 See BoCC Reso 92-5 allocating 14 “EGUs” to the MCDC Pfister Ranch/Golf project. See Pitkin P&Z Reso 91-79 for
reference to 4,000 square feet.
3 See Subdivision Improvement Agreement for Maroon Creek Club, section 21.f
28
Maroon Creek Club
PD Amendment
Page 3
300 SO SPRING ST | 202 | ASPEN, CO 81611
970.925.2855 | BENDONADAMS.COM
The Maroon Creek Club project
consists of free-market residential,
affordable residential, commercial,
lodging, and recreational uses across
370 acres of land. The affordable
housing and other required mitigations
for the entire project were stated in the
SIA.
A snippet of the SIA summarizing the
allowances by type of development is
shown to the right. The full SIA is
attached for reference.
Extended Vested Rights
The project involved substantial infrastructure development of roads and utilities and substantial
earthmoving, grading, drainage improvements and landscape installation. These aspects of the
project were detailed in the SIA and the associated architectural, civil, and landscape drawings.
Recognizing the complexity and the interrelated nature of various components within the
development, Pitkin County granted the Maroon Creek Club project an extended period of
Statutory vested rights. A specific date was not identified; the vested rights were based on an
expected phased build-out of the development with the ability to update the build-out schedule.
To the right is a
snippet of Section
20 of the SIA
regarding vested
rights
Section 3 of the SIA describes a general construction timeline and references a “Phasing
Schedule” which was attached to the SIA. The extended period of Statutory vested rights was
linked to this Phasing Schedule. The Phasing Schedule could be amended by the Community
Development Director which would trigger an automatic extension of the period of vested rights
to adhere to the new phasing schedule. No amendments to the phasing plan show in the project
files.
29
Maroon Creek Club
PD Amendment
Page 4
300 SO SPRING ST | 202 | ASPEN, CO 81611
970.925.2855 | BENDONADAMS.COM
The language to the right is
taken from Section 3 of the
Subdivision Improvement
Agreement, referring to a
construction phasing
schedule.
Section 3 also describes the impact on the project approvals upon “non-adherence” to the
Phasing Schedule. Non-adherence would terminate the Statutory vested rights but leave the
Project Approvals intact. The language shown above from the SIA states “…such non-adherence
shall not result in any loss or abandonment of any Project approvals, including growth
management quota system allocations and replacements.”
Annexation into City of Aspen
Pearce Equities sought annexation of the Maroon Creek Club lands into the City of Aspen.
Annexation was a stipulation of the water service agreement with the City of Aspen. The lands
were annexed pursuant to City of Aspen Ordinances No. 33 and 34, Series 1996. The lands were
provided City of Aspen zoning and the project’s development allowances were clarified and
explained, pursuant to City of Aspen Ordinance No. 40, Series 1996. The City accepted the
approvals granted by Pitkin County, without amendment. A whereas statement in Ordinance 40
reads:
WHEREAS, it is the obligation of the City of Aspen, under the Water Service Agreement,
to not divest or diminish the land use approvals or development rights awarded by Pitkin
County for the project in their entirety and has therefore maintained all existing County
approvals, findings, written interpretations and amendments for the subdivision granted
prior to the annexation agreement; and4
The approvals, including numerous amendments, have been administered by the City of Aspen
since the annexation. Today, the Maroon Creek Club subdivision is largely built-out with only a
handful of vacant residential lots remaining.
4 See Ordinance 40, Series 1996, third whereas statement.
30
Maroon Creek Club
PD Amendment
Page 5
300 SO SPRING ST | 202 | ASPEN, CO 81611
970.925.2855 | BENDONADAMS.COM
Build-Out and City Administration of Approvals
The affordable housing component of the project was completed in 1997. The Maroon Creek
Apartments located just west of the Club building on Stage Court contain 42 one-, two-, and three-
bedroom rental units. An additional single-family unit near the Tiehack lift was constructed and
sold to a qualified purchaser. These units comprised the affordable housing mitigation
requirement of the project.
The lodging component of the project is complete. A 1998 (unrecorded) insubstantial amendment
allowed the 12 lodge units to be reconfigured as 8 units, utilizing the same square footage. These
units were constructed in 1998-1999.
Language to the right is taken from
an (unrecorded) amendment
approved in 1998 regarding the
lodging units
The golf course halfway house at the Maroon Creek Club, originally planned to be 1,200 square
feet, was developed at just 312 square feet. A golf course halfway house is a small ancillary
shelter located on a golf course, usually with a restroom and a drinking fountain, available to
golfers during their round of golf for a nature break, to buy snacks, and to order drinks. This is
not to be confused with a residential facility assisting recently released prisoners reorient to
civilian life under custodial protocol.
An amendment in 2000 reallocated the unused 888 square feet from the halfway house back to
Lot 51 to be added to the remaining commercial square footage. The clubhouse received 788
square feet of this unused allowance. The remaining 100 square feet was reserved for a seasonal
10’x10’ food service tent between holes 10 and 11, providing additional opportunity for snacks
and drinks.
31
Maroon Creek Club
PD Amendment
Page 6
300 SO SPRING ST | 202 | ASPEN, CO 81611
970.925.2855 | BENDONADAMS.COM
Language to the right is
taken from an
(unrecorded) amendment
approved in 2000
regarding the halfway
house
The commercial component of the project was partially constructed. The Grand Champions Club
facility was planned for a significant expansion utilizing commercial square footage relocated from
other properties within the subdivision (Romeo’s Restaurant and the Aspen Country Inn) and
supplemented with commercial square footage gained through the County’s growth management
quota system.
To the right is a snippet of the
commercial component of the
project as stated in the SIA
The City of Aspen has administered the Maroon Creek Club entitlements according to the Project
Approvals and the passage of time has not caused any divestment or diminishment nor any loss
or abandonment of the rights stated in the SIA.
32
Maroon Creek Club
PD Amendment
Page 7
300 SO SPRING ST | 202 | ASPEN, CO 81611
970.925.2855 | BENDONADAMS.COM
Remaining Commercial Expansion:
The land use approvals granted by Pitkin County did not document existing conditions of the
Grand Champions building. The entitlements merely stated authorization to add commercial
square footage to the building.
While the 1993 approval did not state the size of the existing clubhouse, Bill Poss and Associates
is very familiar with the Maroon Creek Club facility, having provided architectural services to the
Club for decades. Bill Poss and Associates prepared a diagram of the Club’s commercial, lodging,
and golf cart storage square footages over time. (Please refer to architectural exhibits)
At the time of the 1993 approval, the Grand Champions Club (as it was known at the time) was
approximately 49,711 square feet, all of which was considered commercial area. An addition to
the Club in the late 1990s expanded the commercial square footage by 14,569 square feet,
bringing the commercial portion of the building to its current size of 64,280 square feet.
Diagrams prepared by Bill Poss and Associates show
the evolution of the Club building, over time, by level.
(please see larger drawing set)
Cart storage was approximately 4,530 square feet at the time of the 1993 approval and has not
been expanded. While this square footage allowance cannot be repurposed for commercial
usage, the applicant may still want to expand the cart storage area in the future by utilizing this
remaining 8,000 square feet. This application does not dip into this remaining golf cart storage
allowance.
The approved lodging units were added to the Grand Champions building in the late 1990s.
Square footage associated with these units is not considered commercial; the lodging units were
called-out as a separate development right.
In summary, the commercial area of the Grand Champions building was granted approval to
expand by 22,888 square feet. This is comprised of the 31,100 square feet stated in the approval,
minus the 8,000 square feet allocated to cart storage area, plus the 788 square feet from the
unused half-way house allowance.
The chart to the right shows
the total commercial
allowance for Club
expansion
Commercial
Expansion
Allowance
Golf Cart
Storage
"Returned"
from golf
Ancillary
Structures
Available for
Club Building
Expansion
30,100 - 8,000 + 788 = 22,888
33
Maroon Creek Club
PD Amendment
Page 8
300 SO SPRING ST | 202 | ASPEN, CO 81611
970.925.2855 | BENDONADAMS.COM
Subtracting the 14,569 square foot commercial expansion accomplished in the late 1990s leaves
the Club building with a potential to add 8,319 square feet of commercial space to the Club
building. This application proposes to utilize this square footage square feet of this remaining
allowance.
Proposed Expansion:
The clubhouse building is proposed for expansion in five areas.
Restaurant Dining Trellis
The outdoor bar and restaurant area of the clubhouse is proposed for expansion by 1,399 square
feet. Most of the expansion is covered with a horizontal trellis while a small expansion of the
existing pitched roof is also proposed. While the expansion areas are unconditioned outdoor
spaces, the covered areas that are more than 10 feet from the edge of the building are to be
counted as floor area.5
The plan and 3-D
image to the right
shows the areas and
character of the dining
terrace expansion
The trellis structures will consist of a metal structural frame and an operable louvered roof system
that can be opened and closed depending on weather conditions.
5 See City of Aspen Ordinance 40, 1996, Exhibit A for floor area calculation methods
1993
“Original”
Grand
Champions
1993
Commercial
Expansion
Potential
1998-9
Commercial
Additions
Total
Current
Club
Remaining
Club
Expansion
Potential
Total 49,711 22,888 14,569 64,280 8,319
34
Maroon Creek Club
PD Amendment
Page 9
300 SO SPRING ST | 202 | ASPEN, CO 81611
970.925.2855 | BENDONADAMS.COM
Tennis Observation Bridges
A 1,846 square foot expansion of the main level
above the tennis courts is planned to provide
overhead viewing of the tennis courts. This
expansion is entirely internal.
The overhead walkways above the tennis courts
are highlighted in green in the snippet to the right
Gym Expansion
A 2,434 square foot e xpansion of the gym is planne d to enclose a large outdoor terrace adjacent
to the existing gym. The existing outdoor terrace is seldom used and an enclosed space will
better accommodate the needs of the club. Large operable windows are planned along the
western façade.
The diagrams to the right show the existing
outdoor gym terrace on the left (shown in
white) and the proposed enclosure area on
the right (shown in light green)
The rendering below shows the
character of the proposed gym
expansion
35
Maroon Creek Club
PD Amendment
Page 10
300 SO SPRING ST | 202 | ASPEN, CO 81611
970.925.2855 | BENDONADAMS.COM
Guest Services Kitchen Expansion
A 1,004 square foot expansion of the
existing guest services kitchen is planned.
This kitchen serves the pool, pool lounge,
event space, and golf services. (The
restaurant has its own dedicated kitchen.)
The expansion is just north and east of the
existing guest services kitchen.
Covered Fitness
A new covered area adjacent to the lower level of the gym, on the west side of the building, is
proposed as a covered outdoor fitness area. This area is currently accessible and connects the
gym and lockering area to the outdoor tennis courts and pool area. Covering this area will enable
better use of the space, including (seasonal) outdoor fitness classes. Areas within 10 feet of the
building are exempt from floor area calculations, leaving 556 square feet of covered area counting
towards the floor area allowance.6
The renderings to the right show the existing
condition (upper) and proposed covered fitness
area (lower). The plan below highlight in green the
portion of the structure that will count towards the
allowable floor area
6 ibid
36
Maroon Creek Club
PD Amendment
Page 11
300 SO SPRING ST | 202 | ASPEN, CO 81611
970.925.2855 | BENDONADAMS.COM
Event Space
A new event space of 1,080 square feet located just south of the main building and east of the
outdoor pool is proposed to accommodate various uses and activities throughout the year. This
structure will minimize the need for temporary “party” tents. Like the dining terrace expansion, the
event space is an unconditioned outdoor space that due to the covering will “count” as floor area.
No exemption is assumed for this structure as it is not connected to the main building. The
structure is proposed as a simple post and beam wooden structure with open sides.
The plan and rendering to
the right show the location
and character of the
proposed event space
The proposed expansion is within the parameters set forth in the Subdivision Improvements
Agreement. However, the SIA did not provide specific layout and architecture of the expansion
and the overall documentation is lacking.
The property is legally described as Lot 51; Maroon Creek Club Subdivision. The property is
owned by Maroon Creek Limited Liability Company LLC with Maroon Creek Investors LLC as its
Manager. Andrew Hecht is the Manager of Maroon Creek Investors LLC. BendonAdams has
been authorized by Mr. Hecht to submit this request.
We believe this request contains the necessary information for a complete and competent review.
Please let us know if additional information is needed. We look forward to your review and will
make ourselves available for any questions or concerns you have.
Restaurant
Dining
Trellis
Observation
Bridges
Guest
Services
Kitchen
Expansion
Covered
Fitness
Area
Gym
Expansion
Event
Space
Total
Expansion
Total
sq. ft. 1,399 1,846 1,004 556 2,434 1,080 8,31 9
37
Maroon Creek Club
PD Amendment
Page 12
300 SO SPRING ST | 202 | ASPEN, CO 81611
970.925.2855 | BENDONADAMS.COM
Kind Regards,
Chris Bendon, AICP
BendonAdams LLC
Attachments:
A 1. Review Criteria – GMQS
2. Review Criteria – PD Amendment
3. Review Criteria – Approval Documents
4. Review Criteria – Commercial Design Standards
B 1. Survey
2. Site Plan, Existing and Proposed plans, Lighting Spec.
3. Preliminary Engineering Report
C 1. Land use application form
2. Fee agreement
3. HOA form
4. Authorization letter
5. Statement of authority
6. Proof of ownership
7. Pre-Application conference summary
8. Vicinity map
D 1. Subdivision Improvement Agreement – 363236
2. City of Aspen Ordinance 40, 1996
3. Pitkin County BoCC Reso 93-104
4. Pitkin County BoCC Reso 92-5
5. Pitkin County P&Z Reso 91-79
6. Pitkin County BoCC Reso 91-111
38
Exhibit A1
Review Criteria
GMQS
26.470.150. - Amendment of a growth management development order.
(a) Insubstantial amendment. An insubstantial amendment to an approved growth management
development order may be authorized by the Community Development Director if:
1. The change conforms to all other provisions of the Land Use Code and does not exceed
approved variations to the residential design standards, require an amendment to the
commercial design review approval or such variations or amendments have been approved.
Response: The 1993 approval of the Maroon Creek Club allocated commercial
square footage to Lot 51 (the Grand Champions Club parcel) but did not include
specific architectural plans for the expansion. Pitkin County did not have
Commercial Design Review or any level of architectural review standards. As a
requirement of the County approval, a set of architectural controls and design
guidelines were adopted for the Subdivision. The guidelines do not extend to Lot
51.
A previous exterior remodel project approved in 2022 was reviewed and
approved as an insubstantial amendment to a commercial design review. The
existing building was used as the baseline to evaluate the changes.
This application has applied for a Substantial Amendment to a Commercial
Design Review. Assuming this review is successful, this criterion will be met.
2. The change does not alter the number, size, type or deed restriction of the proposed
affordable housing units, subject to compliance with the Aspen/Pitkin County Housing
Authority Guidelines.
Response: This application does not alter the affordable housing associated with
this development. The Maroon Creek Club was approved as a multi-site, multi -
use project with all associated employee generation and affordable housing
impacts of the entire development, considering full build-out, mitigated through
the development of the deed-restricted Maroon Creek Apartments and a deed-
restricted single -family home near the Tiehack lift. The affordable housing
mitigation has been constructed and this application does not propose any
alterations to the affordable housing.
3. The change is limited to technical or engineering considerations discovered prior to or during
actual development that could not reasonably be anticipated during the review process or
any other minor change that the Community Development Director finds has no substantial
effect on the conditions and representations made during the original project review.
39
Response: Growth Management Allotments for the commercial square footage
were obtained by the Maroon Creek Development Corporation (MCDC), as
documented in the final detailed submission approval granted by Pitkin County via
BoCC Resolution No. 91-111 consisting of 26,100 square feet of the planned
30,100 commercial square footage of the Pfister Ranch/Golf project.1 To achieve
the 30,100 square foot total for the project, the MCDC obtained the remaining
4,000 square feet in the 1991 GMQS competition via Pitkin County Planning and
Zoning Commission Resolution No. 91-79 and BoCC Resolution No. 92-5.2 These
previous growth management approvals were summarized in BoCC Resolution
No. 104-93 with a proviso that Reso 104 become a dominant document in case of
discrepancies.
Upon approval of all related reviews, Pearce Equities Group II LLC (successor to
the MCDC) entered into a Subdivision Improvements Agreement (SIA) with Pitkin
County (recep. no. 363236). The name of the project was changed to the Maroon
Creek Club. The SIA summarized and detailed the land use entitlements (referred
to as the “Project Approvals” in the SIA) and became the controlling document for
the project, replacing the various resolutions adopted by the County for the project,
including replacing Reso 104 -93.3
The SIA summarized the commercial square footage that could be added to the
Grand Champions building (now known as the Club building of the Maroon Creek
Club) as consisting of 30,100 square feet, 8,000 of which was to be used for an
expansion of the golf cart storage. A subsequent administrative amendment added
788 square feet to the total commercial square footage that could be added to the
Club building. Subtracting the square footage reserved for golf cart storage, the
Club building was allowed to expand by 22,888 square feet. A 14,569 square foot
expansion was accomplished in the late 1990s leaving 8,319 square feet of
commercial space that can be added to the Club building.
The SIA includes a section regarding Project Construction and refers to a “phasing
schedule” attached to the SIA. Important in this Project Construction section is an
understanding that the Project Approvals would remain intact, regardless of the
phasing schedule, including all growth management allocations or replacements.4
The commercial square footage described in the SIA remains intact as a
development right of the applicant.
The affordable housing mitigation for the entire Maroon Creek Club project was
calculated based on the entire project, all components and at full build-out. This
affordable housing obligation of the project was met though the construction of the
Maroon Creek Apartments and a single-family home near the base of the Tiehack
lift, all of which are deed restricted according to the requirements of the
Aspen/Pitkin County Housing Authority. Affordable housing mitigation for the
remaining commercial square footage allowance has been provided.
1 See page 5 of BoCC Reso 91-111 summarizing prior GMQS approvals.
2 See BoCC Reso 92-5 allocating 14 “EGUs” to the MCDC Pfister Ranch/Golf project. See Pitkin P&Z Reso 91-79 for
reference to 4,000 square feet.
3 See Subdivision Improvement Agreement for Maroon Creek Club, section 21.f.
4 See Subdivision Improvement Agreement for Maroon Creek Club, section 3.
40
The completion of the Club building at the Maroon Creek Club (the former Grand
Champions building) to the square footage identified as allowed is consistent with
the project approvals. Completing the build -out to the allowed square footage
does no conflict with any aspect or attribute of the approvals. The commercial
square footage described in the SIA remains a development right of the applicant
and the housing mitigation has been provided.
41
Exhibit A2
Review Criteria
PD Insubstantial Amendment
PD Minor Amendment
Approved Plan Set
26.445.110.e - Minor Amendment to a Detailed Review Approval.
An amendment found by the Community Development Director consistent with a Project Review
approval and to be generally consistent with the allowances and limitations of a Detailed Review
approval, or which otherwise represents an insubstantial change, but which does not meet the
established thresholds for an insubstantial amendment, may be approved, approved with
conditions or denied by the Planning and Zoning Commission or the Historic Preservation
Commission as applicable, pursuant to 26.445.040(b)(3) - Step Three.
Response: The 1993 approval of the Maroon Creek Club allocated commercial
square footage to Lot 51 (the Grand Champions Club parcel) but did not include
specific architectural plans for the expansion. Pitkin County did not have
Commercial Design Review at the time or any level of architectural review
standards. As a requirement of the County approval, a set of architectural
controls and design guidelines were adopted for the Subdivision. The guidelines
do not extend to Lot 51.
The 1993 approvals allocated commercial square footage that was assembled
through replacement square footage – the demolition of prior commercial
buildings – and through the County’s GMQS scoring and competition process.
The Subdivision Improvement Agreement (SIA) was adopted as the controlling
document, superseding prior BoCC Resolutions.
The SIA stated the
commercial component
of the project as shown
in the snippet to the
right.
The SIA established a Phasing Schedule and a period of Statutory Vested Rights
based on this Schedule. The SIA clarified that all Project approvals, including all
GMQS allocations and replacements, would remain intact regardless of the
adherence to the Phasing Schedule.
42
The text to the right,
from the Maroon Creek
Club SIA, describes the
Project Approvals
remaining intact upon
non-adherence to the
Phasing Schedule
Combined with the SIA, a subdivision plat and a set of architectural guidelines
constitute the “approval documents” and reflect the approved “detailed review”
of the Planned Development (although such terms were not used in the Pitkin
County Land Use Code in 1993). The build-out of the commercial development
rights is generally consistent with the allowances and limitations of the 1993
approvals. The expansion uses the approved dimensions. The applicant is
amenable to supplying and/or recording additional approval documents to
supplement, clarify, or detail the design and site planning aspects of this
expansion.
26.490.040.d – Approved Plan Set.
When required pursuant to this Title, plans shall be submitted to the Community Development
Department to document the approved design, layout, and configuration of an approved project.
The plans shall reflect approved changes made to the project during the review and provide
reference to approval documents and date(s).
Response: If required by this approval, this applicant will provide an approved
plan set with the site planning and architectural details as well as other specific
details or plans that may be required.
43
Exhibit A3
Review Criteria
Approved Plan Set
26.490.040.d – Approved Plan Set.
When required pursuant to this Title, plans shall be submitted to the Community Development
Department to document the approved design, layout, and configuration of an approved project.
The plans shall reflect approved changes made to the project during the review and provide
reference to approval documents and date(s).
Response: If required by this approval, this applicant will provide an approved
plan set with the site planning and architectural details as well as other specific
details or plans that may be required.
44
Exhibit A4
Review Criteria
Commercial Design
26.412.020 – Commercial Design Standards Applicability
Except as outlined below, this Section applies to all commercial, lodging and mixed -used
development within the City requiring a building permit. All development shall be reviewed
pursuant to the Character Area in which it is located. The Community Development Director
shall assign an appropriate Character Area to properties subject to Commercial Design Review
that are not located within a defined Character Area.
Response: The Maroon Creek Club is not within an assigned Character Area. The
most appropriate Character Area is Neighborhood Mixed Use which is described as “as
distinct transition from commercial to residential with an emphasis on pedestrian
walkability, front yards, and smaller scale architecture.” The Maroon Creek Club is
located on the outskirts of the City and is a planned area with a mix of commercial and
residential uses. Neighborhood Mixed Use is the most appropriate Character Area
considering the context of the building and purpose of the planned area.
Aspen Character Areas
Maroon Creek
Club Clubhouse
Figure 1: Aspen GIS aerial showing the defined character areas in downtown Aspen and the location of the MCC Clubhouse.
45
26.412.060 – Commercial Design Standards Review Criteria
An application for commercial design review may be approved, approved with conditions or
denied based on conformance with the following criteria:
(a) Guidelines and Standards.
(1) The Commercial, Lodging and Historic District Design Standards and Guidelines
are met as determined by the appropriate Commission. The Standards and
Guidelines include design review criteria that are to be used to determine whether
the application is appropriate.
(2) All applicable standards in the Commercial, Lodging and Historic District Design
Standards and Guidelines shall be met unless granted a Variation pursuant to
Section 26.412.040(d), Variations.
(3) Not every guideline will apply to each project, and some balancing of the
guidelines must occur on a case-by-case basis. The applicable Commission must:
a. Determine that a sufficient number of the relevant guidelines are adequately
met in order to approve a project proposal;
b. Weigh the applicable guidelines with the practicality of the measure.
Response: Applicable Design Guidelines and Standards are addressed below.
General Commercial Design Guidelines
The purpose of Commercial Design Review is to preserve and to encourage appropriate
architecture that creates walkable neighborhoods and supports the heritage of Aspen.
The Standards and Guidelines below apply to all projects subject to Commercial Design Review.
Site Planning and Streetscape
1.1 All projects shall provide a context study.
• The study should include the relationship to adjacent structures and streets
through photographs, streetscape elevations, historic maps, etc.
1.2 All projects shall respond to the traditional street grid.
• A building shall be oriented parallel to the street unless uncharacteristic of the
area. Refer to specific chapters for more information.
• Buildings on corners shall be parallel to both streets.
1.3 Landscape elements (both hardscape and softscape) should complement the surrounding
context, support the street scene, and enhance the architecture of the building.
• This applies to landscape located both on-site and in the public right-of-way.
• High quality and durable materials should be used.
• Early in the design process, consider stormwater best management practices as
an integral part of the landscape design process.
46
1.4 Where there is open space on a site, reinforce the traditional transition from public space, to
semi-public space to private space.
• This may be achieved through a fence, a defined walkway, a front porch element,
covered walkway, or landscape.
1.5 Maintain alignment of building facades where appropriate.
• Consider the entire block of a neighborhood to determine appropriate building
placement. Carefully examine and respond to the variety of building alignments that are
present.
• Consider all four corners of an intersection and architectural context to determine
appropriate placement for buildings located on corners.
• Consider the appropriate location of street level Pedestrian Amenity when siting
a new building.
1.6 When a building facade is set back, define the property line. Review the context of the block
when selecting an appropriate technique. Examples include:
• A fence which is low in height and mostly transparent so as to maintain openness
along the street.
• Landscaping, though it may not block views of the architecture or a Pedestrian
Amenity space. Hedgerows over 42 inches are prohibited.
• Benches or other street furniture
Response – Proposed project scope
includes an addition and remodel.
There is no change to building
alignment or open space. No
additional landscape is proposed.
Additions are located on existing
patios or hardscape. There is only one
“street facing façade” as shown at
right. The application includes an
axonometric of the existing and
proposed changes. Existing
photographs are below (please note
the building entrance area is under
construction).
Street
facing
facade
47
48
Alleyways
1.7 – 1.8 n/a. No alley is provided.
Parking
1.9 n/a. No change to parking.
Building Mass, Height, and Scale
1.10 n/a.
1.11 n/a.
1.12 On lots larger than 6,000 square feet, break up building mass into smaller modules.
• A street level front setback to
accommodate Pedestrian Amenity in
accordance with the Pedestrian
Amenity Guidelines may be an
appropriate method to break up
building mass.
• Building setbacks, height
variation, changes of material, and
architectural details may be
appropriate techniques to vertically
divide a building into modules
Response – The proposed minor
expansions of the gym and kitchen,
and activated dining entry area, are
consistent with the existing building
modules and architectural expression
in compliance with 1.12.
1.13 n/a.
Street Level Design
1.14 -1.17 n/a. Commercial storefront does not exist and is not proposed.
Roofscape
1.18 - 1.21 n/a. No roofscape proposed.
Materials and Details
In the 19th Century, Aspen had a limited range of architectural materials: red brick, painted wood,
glass, and locally sourced sandstone. In the mid-century the palette expanded to include natural
49
wood, stucco, river rock and moss rock, metal, concrete block, and bricks of other tones. It is
important to maintain a relationship to the existing material palette evident in the general vicinity
while allowing some new materials and material technology to be used.
The color palette of natural materials throughout the commercial and lodging neighborhoods
represents Aspen’s environment, with browns and reds being the predominant colors. High
quality materials that relate to the context of the neighborhood and the building type are
important. Carefully consider existing color schemes and textures within a neighborhood before
selecting materials. Paint color is variable and is not subject to review.
Introducing a new material may require other aspects of the architecture to show restraint.
Materials must have a proven performance in Aspen’s extreme climate.
1.22 Complete and accurate identification of materials is required.
• Provide drawings that identify the palette of materials, specifications for the
materials, and location on the proposed building as part of the application.
• Physical material samples shall be presented to the review body. An onsite mock-
up prior to installation may be required.
Response – Proposed materials are consistent with the existing palette and are identified
on the drawings and a specific materials sheet within the drawing set including timber
columns, metal roof, wood siding, bronze metal trellis, stone walls, and concrete
hardscape.
1.23 Building materials shall have these features:
* Convey the quality and range of materials found in the current block context or seen historically
in the Character Area.
• Convey pedestrian scale.
• Enhance visual interest through texture, application, and/or dimension.
• Be non-reflective. Shiny or glossy materials are not appropriate as a primary
material.
• Have proven durability and weathering characteristics within Aspen’s climate.
• A material with an integral color shall be a neutral color. Some variation is allowed
for secondary materials.
Response – Building materials are already found on the building and have proven
durability and weathering characteristics. Material colors will match existing and will be
non-reflective.
50
1.24 Introducing a new material, material application, or material finish to the existing streetscape
may be approved by HPC or P&Z if the following criteria are met:
• Innovative building design.
• Creative material application that positively contributes to the streetscape.
• Environmentally sustainable building practice.
• Proven durability.
Response – n/a. No new material, material application or finish is proposed.
1.25 Architecture that reflects corporate branding of the tenant is not permitted.
Response – n/a.
Lighting, Service and Mechanical Areas
1.26 The design of light fixtures should be appropriate to the form, materials, scale, and style of the
building.
Response - No exterior mounted lighting proposed.
Integrated lighting is proposed in the dining
trellises as shown on page 3 of the architectural
plans. A cut sheet is provided. All lights are
dimmable and only shine downward.
1.27 – 1.32 n/a No change proposed to service
and mechanical areas. No exterior mounted
lighting proposed. Integrated lighting is proposed
in the dining trellises as shown on page 3 of the
architectural plans. A cut sheet is provided. All
lights are dimmable and shown down only. There
is no change to service or mechanical areas.
Remodel
Upgrading an existing building through a remodel can improve energy efficiency, building
function and appearance, and meet community goals to reduce construction waste. Altering
specific features of a building, such as replacing exterior materials or constructing an addition to
an existing building, is considered a remodel project. A project that reaches the demolition
threshold as defined in the Land Use Code is not considered a remodel. It is important to carefully
plan a remodel to meet the design guidelines and neighborhood character where feasible.
Gradually bringing remodel projects into conformance with design guidelines reinforces
neighborhood character.
These guidelines apply to projects that are proposing changes to an existing building but do not
reach the demolition threshold.
1.33 All remodel projects shall meet Standards 1.22 and 1.23.
Response – Standards 1.22 and 1.23 are addressed above.
51
1.34 Consider updating windows, doors, and/ or primary entrances to better relate to the
Character Area and pedestrian experience.
Response – The dining entry is updated to provide a more inviting and usable entrance
as shown on previous page. All new windows and doors match existing style.
1.35 Design alterations to relate to the existing building style and form that may remain.
Response – All alterations relate to the existing building characteristics.
1.36 Incorporate elements that define the property line in accordance with Guideline 1.6.
Response – n/a This is a site specific approval that has a defined building envelope.
1.37 Creative solutions that incorporate ADA compliance into the architecture are encouraged.
• Minimize the appearance of ramps by exploring other on-site options such as
altering interior floor levels or exterior grade.
Response – The existing building meets ADA standards as required.
Neighborhood Mixed Use Design Guidelines
Building Placement
5.1 Incorporate open space into building placement and site design.
• Consider a transparent fence to define the street edge.
• Soft and informal landscape design is encouraged.
• Useful open space that supports a variety of uses is recommended.
Response – n/a Open space is not changed by the proposed amendment.
5.2 A front yard setback should be provided.
Response – n/a No change to building footprint is proposed.
5.3 The building entry should be easily seen from the street.
Response – n/a No change to location of building entry.
Architecture
5.4 Gable or pitched roof forms are appropriate and reinforce the residential character of the
neighborhood.
• Other roof forms, such as flat roofs, may be considered on a case-by-case basis
depending on the context of the block, adjacency to historic landmarks, and other
restrictions such as viewplanes.
Response – Proposed roof forms match the existing architectural character of the building
per Standard 1.35 above.
52
(b) Pedestrian Amenity. The proposed development meets the requirements of
Section 26.412.070, Pedestrian Amenity.
Response: n/a. The MCC Clubhouse is zoned OS /PD which is not required to meet
Pedestrian Amenity requirements per Section 26.412.070.a Applicability and
Requirement.
53
EX
-
U
E
EX
-
U
E
EX
-
U
E
EX
-
U
E
EX
-
U
E
EX
-
U
E
EX-UE
X
X
X
X
X
X
X X
X
X
X
X X X X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
XXX
X
X
XX
X
X
48
.
0
0
'
11.3
0
'
16
.
9
0
'
52.90'
16
.
0
0
'
23.90'
12.3
3
'
1
1
.
9
2
'
39.79'
LOT 51
10.876 AC. ±
10 CLUB CIRCLEMULTI LEVEL
WOOD AND STONE
BUILDING
WITH BASEMENT
D
PATIO DRAIN
(TYPICAL)
RETAINING
WALL
(TYPICAL)
PATIO ABOVE
LOWER LEVEL
PATIO ABOVE
LOWER LEVEL
GRADE LEVEL
ROOF
GRADE
LEVEL
ROOF
SKY
LIGHT
SKY
LIGHT
SKY
LIGHT
1" CONDUIT
2" CONDUIT
AC UNIT
GAS
METER
TELEPHONE
PEDESTAL
MECHANICAL
DUCT/WELL
G
G
GAS
METER
WOOD
RAMP
ONE STORY
STAIRWELL
TO BASEMENT
BASEMENT
PARAPET
PLANTER
PLANTER
PLANTER
PLANTER
TURF
TURF
TURF
TURF
TURF
TURF
NATURAL
GRASS
FENCE
GATE
X
X X X
X
X
FENCE ASPHALT
CONCRETE
APRON
CONCRETE
DOCK
EXTERIOR WALKIN
FREEZER
TURF
STAIRSDYH
BUILDING
HYDRANT
CONCRETE
WALK
DYH
FIRE
HYDRANT
S
S
MANHOLE
WV
WV
WATER
VALVE
21.7
0
'
44
.
6
0
'
17.7
0
'
TENNIS
COURT
LAP POOL
CONCRETE
PATIO
CONCRETE
WALK
CONCRETE
WALK
CONCRETE
WALK
CONCRETE
WALK
CONCRETE
WALK
CONCRETE
WALK
CO
N
C
R
E
T
E
WA
L
K
CO
N
C
R
E
T
E
WA
L
K
CO
N
C
R
E
T
E
WA
L
K
TENNIS
COURT
CONCESSION
BUILDING
TURF
DD
D
DD
DD
D D
D
D
D D
DD
PATIO DRAIN
(TYPICAL)
DRAIN
RIM= 7864.46'
DRAIN
RIM= 7864.44'
DRAIN
RIM= 7864.47'DRAIN
RIM= 7864.51'
POOL COOPING
BOULDER
BOULDER
PLANTER
DDRAIN
RIM=7863.13'
PLANTER
PLANTER
TENNIS
COURT
IRRIGATION
VALVE BOX
(TYPICAL)
IVB IVB
IVB
IVB
IVB
IVB
IVB
IVB
FENCE
FENCE
CO
N
C
R
E
T
E
WA
L
K
TURF
CONCRETE
PATIO
CONCRETE
PATIO
RETAINING
WALL
(TYPICAL)
RETAINING
WALL
(TYPICAL)
PATIO DRAIN
ON WALKWAY
ABOVE
DECIDUOUS
TREE (TYPICAL)
E
ELECTRIC
BOX
CONCRETE
STEPS
CONCRETE
STEPS
CONCRETE
STEPS
HAND
RAILS
TRENCH
DRAIN
SPA
LIGHT
(TYPICAL)
7855.87'
7856.23'
7855.79'
7855.90'
7855.94'
7855.80'
7855.71'
7855.81'
7855.81'
TW = 7859.90'
7859.90'
7859.56'
7859.73'
7859.74'
7859.68'
TW = 7863.64'
7859.70'
7859.79'
7859.77'
7859.79'
SPA
BUILDING
7863.63'
7855.69'
7855.90'
7859.53'
7855.90'
7863.45'
7859.78'
7855.95'
7859.59'
TRENCH
DRAIN
7863.37'
7863.21'
7862.83'
7862.69'
7859.57'
7859.59'
7859.57'
7859.70'
CONCRETE
WALK
CONCRETE
WALK
4" PVC @ 1%
FENCE
7865.35'
7865.27'
7865.14'
7865.15'
7863.38'
7863.44'
UNDERGROUND
GAS (TYPICAL)
UNDERGROUND
ELECTRIC (TYPICAL)
7856.21'
7856.03'
7856.19'
7856.16'
7856.14'
FF = 7856.37'
AC
TRAFFIC
MIRROR
DECIDUOUS TREE
PER PLAN
78657865
7863
7862
7860
7856
7
8
5
6
7
8
6
3
7
8
6
3
7864
78
6
4
7865
7865
78
6
6
78
6
7
7
8
5
6
78
6
3
785
6
785
9
C1
L1
L2
L
3
L4
L
5
L6
L7
L
8
L9
L10
L11
L12
L13
L1
4
L
1
5
L
1
6
L17
C
2
L
1
8
#5 REBAR & CAP
L.S.#20133 FOUND
B
A
S
I
S
O
F
B
E
A
R
I
N
G
S
LOT 52
LOT 51
10.876 AC. ±
10 CLUB CIRCLE
SEE
DETAIL
THIS
SHEET
#5 REBAR & CAP
L.S.#20133 FOUND
SEE
DETAIL
PAGE 2
SEE
DETAIL
PAGE 2
4"PVC
LINE TABLE
LINE #
L1
L2
L3
L4
L5
L6
L7
L8
L9
L10
L11
L12
L13
L14
L15
L16
L17
L18
BEARING
N00°57'23"E
N90°00'00"E
S45°00'00"E
N47°30'00"E
N42°30'00"W
N90°00'00"E
N00°00'00"E
S55°44'00"E
S64°10'00"E
S73°03'00"E
S78°44'00"E
S75°47'00"E
S69°14'00"E
S59°14'00"E
S48°35'00"E
S10°26'00"E
S87°11'08"E
N43°02'12"W
DISTANCE
264.88'
203.40'
227.79'
229.54'
670.68'
349.77'
297.00'
75.14'
79.10'
50.29'
203.36'
94.37'
39.52'
131.07'
15.27'
26.19'
27.79'
62.35'
CURVE TABLE
CURVE #
C1
C2
ARC LENGTH
222.60'
15.17'
RADIUS
320.00'
170.00'
DELTA ANGLE
39°51'25"
5°06'46"
CHORD BEARING
S20°53'05"W
N45°35'35"W
CHORD LENGTH
218.14'
15.16'
NOTICE: ACCORDING TO COLORADO LAW, YOU MUST COMMENCE ANY LEGAL ACTION
BASED UPON ANY DEFECT IN THIS SURVEY WITHIN THREE YEARS AFTER YOU FIRST
DISCOVER SUCH DEFECT. IN NO EVENT MAY ANY ACTION BASED UPON ANY DEFECT IN
THIS SURVEY BE COMMENCED MORE THAN TEN YEARS FROM THE DATE OF THE
CERTIFICATION SHOWN HEREON.
NOTES:
1) THIS PROPERTY IS SUBJECT TO RESERVATIONS, RESTRICTIONS, COVENANTS, BUILDING
SETBACKS AND EASEMENTS OF RECORD, OR IN PLACE AND EXCEPTIONS TO TITLE SHOWN IN
THE TITLE COMMITMENT PREPARED BY LAND TITLE GUARANTEE COMPANY, ORDER NO.
Q62014635-3, DATED EFFECTIVE JANUARY 26, 2024.
2) THE DATE OF THIS SURVEY WAS MARCH 10, APRIL 6, AND MAY 10, 2022.
3) BASIS OF BEARINGS FOR THIS SURVEY IS A BEARING OF S38°46'03"E BETWEEN THE
NORTHERLY ANGLE POINT OF LOT 51, A #5 REBAR AND CAP L.S. #20133 FOUND IN PLACE AND
THE SOUTHERLY ANGLE POINT OF LOT 51, A #5 REBAR AND CAP L.S. #20133 FOUND IN PLACE.
4) UNITS OF MEASURE FOR ALL DIMENSIONS SHOWN HEREON IS U.S. SURVEY FEET.
5) THIS SURVEY IS BASED ON THE MAROON CREEK CLUB P.U.D. FINAL PLAT RECORDED
NOVEMBER 15, 1993 IN PLAT BOOK 33 AND PAGE 4 AND THE PARTIALLY CORRECTED PLAT
RECORDED SEPTEMBER 27, 1996 IN PLAT BOOK 34 AT PAGE 23 IN THE PITKIN COUNTY CLERK
AND RECORDER'S OFFICE AND CORNERS FOUND IN PLACE.
6) ELEVATIONS ARE BASED ON A GPS OBSERVATION UTILIZING THE WESTERN COLORADO
RTVRN GPS NETWORK (1988 ORTHO DATUM) YIELDING AN ON-SITE ELEVATION OF 7864.62' ON
THE SOUTHERLY ANGLE POINT OF LOT 51 AS SHOWN. CONTOUR INTERVAL EQUALS 1 FOOT.
7) THIS PROPERTY IS SUBJECT TO MATTERS DESCRIBED IN RECEPTION NO. 646596.
8) ACCORDING TO THE CITY OF ASPEN WEBSITE THIS PROPERTY IS ZONED PD. BUILDING
SETBACKS WILL NEED TO BE VERIFIED WITH COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT PRIOR TO ANY
PLANNING, DESIGN OR CONSTRUCTION.
N
E
S
W
0
30
60
90
120
150
180
210
240
270
300
330
P
e
a
k
S u r v e y i n
g
,
I
n
c
.
0200 200 400 800100
SUBJECT
PROPERTY
VICINITY MAP
SCALE: 1" = 2000'
010 10 20 405
COL O R A D O L I CE
N
S
E
D
P
R
O
F
E
S
SIONAL L A N D S U RVEYOR
JAS O N R . N
E
I
L
37935
PROPERTY DESCRIPTION
LOT 51, MAROON CREEK CLUB ACCORDING TO THE FINAL PLAT RECORDED NOVEMBER 15,
1993 IN PLAT BOOK 33 AT PAGE 4
CITY OF ASPEN,
COUNTY OF PITKIN,
STATE OF COLORADO
SURVEYOR'S STATEMENT:
I, JASON R. NEIL, HEREBY CERTIFY TO MAROON CREEK, LLC., THAT I AM A PROFESSIONAL
LAND SURVEYOR LICENSED UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF COLORADO; THAT THIS LAND
SURVEY PLAT IS TRUE, CORRECT AND COMPLETE BASED ON MY KNOWLEDGE, INFORMATION
AND BELIEF AS LAID OUT AND SHOWN HEREON; THAT THIS LAND SURVEY PLAT IS NOT A
GUARANTY OR WARRANTY, EITHER EXPRESSED OR IMPLIED, THAT THIS LAND SURVEY PLAT
WAS MADE BY ME FROM AN ACCURATE SURVEY OF THE REAL PROPERTY PERFORMED BY ME
OR UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION ON MARCH 10, APRIL 6, MAY 10, AND OCTOBER 18, 2022.
DATED: FEBRUARY 20, 2024
BY:___________________________________
JASON R. NEIL, P.L.S. NO. 37935
FOR AND ON BEHALF OF
PEAK SURVEYING, INC.
GYM/KITCHEN
EXPANSION
OVERALL BOUNDARY
LOT 51
ByNO.Date Project NO.RevisionDrawn By:
Checked By:
Date:
Computer File:
P.O. Box 1746
Rifle, CO 81650
Phone (970) 625-1954
Fax (970) 579-7150
www.peaksurveyinginc.com
S
NW
E
P e a k Su r v ey i ng, Inc.
Si nc e 2 0 0 7
19064
1 OF 2
MAROON CREEK, LLC.
CITY OF ASPEN, COLORADO
PARTIAL EXISTING CONDITIONS
LOT 51, MAROON CREEK CLUB
10 CLUB CIRCLE
SMS
JRN
FEBRUARY 20, 2024
064-AS BUILT
PARTIAL EXISTING CONDITIONS SURVEY
LOT 51, MAROON CREEK CLUB, ACCORDING TO THE FINAL PLAT RECORDED
NOVEMBER 15, 1993 IN PLAT BOOK 33 AT PAGE 4
CITY OF ASPEN, COUNTY OF PITKIN, STATE OF COLORADO
Exhibit B1
54
N 47
°
3
0
'
0
0
"
E
2
2
9
.
5
4
'
EX
-
U
E
EX
-
U
E
EX-U
E
E
X
-
U
E
EX-UE
EX-U
E
E
X
-
U
E
EX
-
U
E
EX
-
U
E
EX
-
U
E
EX
-
U
E
EX
-
U
E
E
X
-
U
E
E
X
-
U
E
E
X
-
U
E
E
X
-
U
E
EX
-
U
E
EX-UE
EX-UE
XXX
JB
7863.49'
78
6
3
.
5
6
'
78
6
3
.
8
4
'
78
6
3
.
7
1
'
78
6
3
.
4
2
'
78
6
3
.
6
1
'
78
6
3
.
1
4
'
7863
.
1
9
'
786
3
.
2
6
'
7
8
6
3
.
2
9
'
7864.00'
786
3
.
8
4
'
786
3
.
9
1
'
786
5
.
0
2
'
7864
.
9
0
'
786
4
.
0
3
'
78
6
3
.
6
0
'
78
6
3
.
3
0
'
7
8
6
3
.
5
9
'
7
8
6
3
.
5
9
'
7863
.
5
9
'
7863
.
5
9
'
7863.60'
7
8
6
3
.
6
2
'
78
6
3
.
5
0
'
78
6
3
.
3
8
'
F
11.3
0
'
16
.
9
0
'
2
3
.
6
0
'
16.90'
11.3
0
'
40.00'
11.3
0
'
CONCRETE
PATIO
LOT 51
10.876 AC. ±
10 CLUB CIRCLEMULTI LEVEL
WOOD AND STONE
BUILDING
WITH BASEMENT
GAS REGULATOR
POOL
POOL COOPING
CONCRETE
PATIO
HAND RAILS EDGE OF
CONCRETE
PATIO
ROOF DRAIN FF = 7865.27'
D
FF = 7863.82'
SUBFLOOR
CO
N
C
R
E
T
E
RA
M
P
CONCRETE
LANDING
CONCRETE
STEPS
4" PVC @ 1%
4" PVC @ 1%
4" PVC @ 1%
D8 - CLEANOUT
WITH 2" PVC
RISER:7863.85'
D10 - CLEANOUT
WITH 2" PVC
RISER:7863.91'
ELECTRIC
LID:7863.90'
PL
A
N
T
E
R
HANDRAILS
PER PLAN
FL
O
W
L
I
N
E
D
I
T
C
H
#5 REBAR & CAP
L.S.#20133 FOUND
TBM EL=7864.62'
TREES PER PLAN
(TYPICAL)
A5 - 15" DRAIN
RIM:7862.37'
6" II NW:7861.07'
6" IO SW:7861.09'
SUMP:7860.48'
D
6" PVC @ 0.9%
6" PVC @ 5.8%
POOL DRAIN
PER PLAN
UNDERGROUND
ELECTRIC
(TYPICAL)
A6 - 10" DRAIN
RIM:7863.12'
6" IO NE:7862.22'
SUMP:7861.66'POOL FILTER
UNDERGROUND
ELECTRIC
(TYPICAL)
TRENCH
DRAIN
WALK
4" PVC @ 1%
FENCE
7863.38'
7863.44'
786
5
786
4
786
3
786
3
78
6
4
786
4
7864
FF = 7865.48'
DRIAN
RIM = 7865.33'
DRIAN
RIM = 7865.27'
INV=7864.00'
DRAIN
RIM= 7865.22'
INV= 7863.75'
CONCRETE
PATIO
STONE WALL
(TYPICAL)
STONE WALL
(TYPICAL)
CONCRETE
STEPS
(TYPICAL)
CONCRETE
STEPS
DRAIN
RIM =7865.22'
INV =7863.85'
DRAIN
RIM=7865.21'
DRAIN
RIM=7865.35'
INV=7863.59'
DRAIN
RIM=7865.23'
INV=7864.24'
RIDGE= 7889.23'
FIRE
HYDRANT
RAMP TO
BASEMENT
STORAGE
SEWER
MANHOLE
WATER
VALVE
23.1'
24
.
5
'
38.8'
56
.
1
0
'
88.90'
LOT 51
10.876 AC. ±
10 CLUB CIRCLE
MULTI LEVEL
WOOD AND STONE
BUILDING
WITH BASEMENT
RIDGE= 7889.24'
FF = 7865.48'
FF = 7865.48'
D
D
D
D
DD
D
BUILDING
OVERHANG
BUILDING
COLUMN
S S
DYH
WV
POND
TURF
PLANTER
DECIDUOUS TREE
(TYPICAL)
EVERGREEN TREE
(TYPICAL)
IRRIGATION
VALVE BOX
(TYPICAL)
IVB IVB
IVB
IVB
IVB
IVB
PLANTER
DECIDUOUS TREE
(TYPICAL)
PLANTER
PLANTER
CONCRETE
WALK
CONCRETE
WALK
TURF
PRACTICE
PUTTING GREEN
DECIDUOUS TREE
(TYPICAL)
78
6
0
78
6
0
7860
7865
78
6
5
7865
7863
7863
78
6
2
786
3
7864
7865
7865
NOTICE: ACCORDING TO COLORADO LAW, YOU MUST COMMENCE ANY LEGAL ACTION
BASED UPON ANY DEFECT IN THIS SURVEY WITHIN THREE YEARS AFTER YOU FIRST
DISCOVER SUCH DEFECT. IN NO EVENT MAY ANY ACTION BASED UPON ANY DEFECT IN
THIS SURVEY BE COMMENCED MORE THAN TEN YEARS FROM THE DATE OF THE
CERTIFICATION SHOWN HEREON.
ByNO.Date Project NO.RevisionDrawn By:
Checked By:
Date:
Computer File:
P.O. Box 1746
Rifle, CO 81650
Phone (970) 625-1954
Fax (970) 579-7150
www.peaksurveyinginc.com
S
NW
E
P e a k Su r v ey i ng, Inc.
Sinc e 2 0 0 7
19064
2 OF 2
MAROON CREEK, LLC.
CITY OF ASPEN, COLORADO
PARTIAL EXISTING CONDITIONS
LOT 51, MAROON CREEK CLUB
10 CLUB CIRCLE
SMS
JRN
FEBRUARY 20, 2024
064-AS BUILT
PARTIAL EXISTING CONDITIONS SURVEY
LOT 51, MAROON CREEK CLUB, ACCORDING TO THE FINAL PLAT RECORDED
NOVEMBER 15, 1993 IN PLAT BOOK 33 AT PAGE 4
CITY OF ASPEN, COUNTY OF PITKIN, STATE OF COLORADO
N
E
S
W
0
30
60
90
120
150
180
210
240
270
300
330
P
e
a
k
S u r v e y i n
g
,
I
n
c
.
010 10 20 405
COL O R A D O L I CE
N
S
E
D
P
R
O
F
E
SSIONAL L A N D S U RVEYO
R
JAS O N R . N
E
I
L
37935
DINING TRELLIS
EVENT SPACE
55
1
Phase 3 Site Plan
CHECKED BY:
#
DE
S
C
R
I
P
T
I
O
N
DR
A
W
N
B
Y
CONSTRUCTION
DRAWN BY:
JOB # 2019-52
NOT FOR
RO
A
R
I
N
G
F
O
R
K
E
N
G
I
N
E
E
R
I
N
G
59
2
H
I
G
H
W
A
Y
1
3
3
CA
R
B
O
N
D
A
L
E
,
C
O
8
1
6
2
3
PH
:
(
9
7
0
)
3
4
0
-
4
1
3
0
DCS
ADW
MA
R
O
O
N
C
R
E
E
K
C
L
U
B
AS
P
E
N
,
C
O
L
O
R
A
D
O
N
W E
S
Exhibit B2
56
LODGING ADDITION
541 SF
ORIGINAL CLUB
38,119 SF
CLUB ADDITION
4,147 SF
ORIGINAL CART STORAGE
4,530 SF
LODGING ADDITION
4,496 SF
28 SF
10'-0"
28 SF
10'-0"
92 SF
10'-0"
10
'-0"
10'-0"
92 SF
138 SF
138 SF
CLUB ADDITION
10,422 SF
ORIGINAL CLUB
10,727 SF
NET LIVABLE
3,484 SF
10'-0"
10
'
-
0
"
LODGING ADDITION
3,960 SF
ORIGINAL CLUB
865 SF
10'-0"
55 SF
55 SF
10'-0"
NET LIVABLE
3,476 SF
AREA CALCULATIONS
ORIGINAL CLUB (COMMERCIAL)
LODGING ADDITION
CLUB ADDITION (COMMERCIAL)
ORIGINAL CART STORAGE
LOWER LEVEL AREA =
ORIGINAL CLUB 38,119 SF
LODGING ADDITION 541 SF
CLUB ADDITION 4,147 SF
ORIGNIAL CART STORAGE 4,530 SF
MAIN LEVEL AREA =
ORIGINAL CLUB 10,727 SF
LODGING ADDITION 4,644 SF
CLUB ADDITION 10,422 SF
UPPER LEVEL AREA =
ORIGINAL CLUB 865 SF
LODGING ADDITION 4,070 SF
TOTAL AREA =
47,337 SF
26,161 SF
4,935 SF
78,433 SF
Consultant
ARCHITECTURE PLANNING+
( T ) 9 7 0 / 9 2 5 4 7 5 5 ( F ) 9 7 0 / 9 2 0 2 9 5 0
6 0 5 E A S T M A I N S T R E E T A S P E N, C O L O R A D O 8 1 6 1 1
SHEET TITLE
BILL POSS AND ASSOCIATES,
ARCHITECTURE AND PLANNING, P.C.
THE INFORMATION AND DESIGN INTENT CONTAINED ON THIS DOCUMENT IS THE
PROPERTY OF BILL POSS AND ASSOCIATES, ARCHITECTURE AND PLANNING, P.C.
NO PART OF THIS INFORMATION MAY BE USED WITHOUT THE PRIOR WRITTEN
PERMISSION OF BILL POSS AND ASSOCIATES, ARCHITECTURE AND PLANNING, P.C.
BILL POSS AND ASSOCIATES, ARCHITECTURE AND PLANNING, P.C. SHALL RETAIN
ALL COMMON LAW STATUTORY AND OTHER RESERVED RIGHTS, INCLUDING
COPYRIGHT THERETO.
c 2019
PROJECT NO:
Issue:
SCALE:
3/
1
1
/
2
0
2
4
1
:
4
5
:
4
0
P
M
MAROON CREEK CLUB -
PHASE 2
10 CLUB CIRCLE, ASPEN, CO 81611
SD10
AREA CALCULATIONS
22229.00
SCALE 1/32" = 1'-0"1 AREA PLAN - LOWER LEVEL
SCALE 1/32" = 1'-0"2 AREA PLAN - MAIN LEVEL
SCALE 1/32" = 1'-0"3 AREA PLAN - UPPER LEVEL
SCALE 1/32" = 1'-0"4 AREA PLAN - ROOF LEVEL
57
GYM EXPANSION
2,434 SF
DINING TRELLIS
477 SF
DINING TRELLIS
776 SF
DINING TRELLIS
146 SF
AREA BALANCE
8,319 SF
KITCHEN EXPANSION = 1,004 SF
GYM EXPENSION = 2,434 SF
COVERED FITNESS = 556 SF
EVENT SPACE = 1,080 SF
OBSERVATION BRIDGES = 1,846 SF
DINING TRELLIS = 1,399 SF
TOTAL NEW FLOOR AREA = 8,319 SF
EVENT SPACE
1,080 SF
KITCHEN EXPANSION
1,004 SF
COVERED FITNESS
556 SF
NO EXTERIOR WALL MOUNTED
LIGHTING. ALL OVERHEAD LIGHTS
WILL BE DARK SKY COMPLIANT AND
MEET ALL CITY OF ASPEN CODES.
10'-0"
10'
-
0
"
10
'
-
0
"
10'-0"
10
'
-
0
"
OBSERVATION BRIDGE
923 SF
OBSERVATION BRIDGE
923 SF
10'-0"
PERIMETER 5'-0" OFFSET
7,243 SF
5'-0"
Consultant
ARCHITECTURE PLANNING+
( T ) 9 7 0 / 9 2 5 4 7 5 5 ( F ) 9 7 0 / 9 2 0 2 9 5 0
6 0 5 E A S T M A I N S T R E E T A S P E N, C O L O R A D O 8 1 6 1 1
SHEET TITLE
BILL POSS AND ASSOCIATES,
ARCHITECTURE AND PLANNING, P.C.
THE INFORMATION AND DESIGN INTENT CONTAINED ON THIS DOCUMENT IS THE
PROPERTY OF BILL POSS AND ASSOCIATES, ARCHITECTURE AND PLANNING, P.C.
NO PART OF THIS INFORMATION MAY BE USED WITHOUT THE PRIOR WRITTEN
PERMISSION OF BILL POSS AND ASSOCIATES, ARCHITECTURE AND PLANNING, P.C.
BILL POSS AND ASSOCIATES, ARCHITECTURE AND PLANNING, P.C. SHALL RETAIN
ALL COMMON LAW STATUTORY AND OTHER RESERVED RIGHTS, INCLUDING
COPYRIGHT THERETO.
c 2019
PROJECT NO:
Issue:
SCALE:
3/
1
1
/
2
0
2
4
1
:
5
9
:
4
2
P
M
MAROON CREEK CLUB -
PHASE 2
10 CLUB CIRCLE, ASPEN, CO 81611
SD20
FLOOR AREA SUMMARY
22229.00
TRELLIS BRONZE METALMETAL ROOFING, TIMBER COLUMNS,
STONE WALLS, CONCRETE HARDSCAPE
TIMBER COLUMNS, METAL FLASHING
TIMBER COLUMNS, METAL FLASHING,
METAL FRAMED WINDOWS
STANDING SEAM METAL ROOFING HORIZONTAL WOOD
SIDING
58
8" SQUARE COLUMNS,
PAINTED BRONZE
1,068 SF
EXISTING ROOF
LINES ABOVE
439 SF
733 SF
EXISTING
OVERHANG
EXISTING
OVERHANG
12" ROUND
TIMBER COLUMNS
SD21
3
SD212
CENTERED DOOR
WITH SIDE LITES
STACKING DOOR TO
MATCH EXISTING
EXISTING ROOF
LINES ABOVE
GLASS RAILING
EXTENDED CONCRETE PATIO
LINE OF TRELLIS ABOVE
STONE STAIRS
STONE WALLS
LINE OF TRELLIS ABOVE
STONE WALLS
EXTENDED CONCRETE PATIO
8" SQUARE COLUMNS,
PAINTED BRONZE
LINE OF TRELLIS ABOVE
GLASS RAILING
8" SQUARE COLUMNS,
PAINTED BRONZE
STONE STAIRS
RENSON AERO ROOF,
BRONZE FINISH
METAL ROOF TO
MATCH EXISTING
RENSON AERO ROOF,
BRONZE FINISH
METAL ROOF TO
MATCH EXISTING
8"115"8"115"8"
8" STRUCTURAL FRAME,
PAINTED BRONZE
8" STRUCTURAL FRAME,
PAINTED BRONZE
RENSON AERO ROOF,
BRONZE FINISH
8" STRUCTURAL FRAME,
PAINTED BRONZE
8"
11
8
"
8"
11
8
"
8"
8"
76
"
8"
76
"
8"
79
"
8"
79
"
8"
88
"
8"
88
"
8"
8"115"8"115"8"8"115"8"115"8"
8"
76
"
8"
76
"
8"
79
"
8"
79
"
8"
10
"
8'
-
1
0
"
10
"
8'
-
1
0
"
STONE WALLS
METAL FRAME,
PAINTED BRONZE
GLASS RAILING
METAL ROOF TO
MATCH EXISTING
3'
-
0
"
10
"
8'
-
1
0
"
3'
-
0
"
10
"
8'
-
1
0
"
3'
-
0
"
STONE WALLS
METAL FRAME,
PAINTED BRONZE
GLASS RAILING
METAL ROOF TO
MATCH EXISTING
STONE STAIRS
TIMBER BEAMS
AND RAFTERS TO
MATCH EXISTING
METAL ROOF TO
MATCH EXISTING
STONE WALLS
METAL FRAME,
PAINTED BRONZE
GLASS RAILING
Consultant
ARCHITECTURE PLANNING+
( T ) 9 7 0 / 9 2 5 4 7 5 5 ( F ) 9 7 0 / 9 2 0 2 9 5 0
6 0 5 E A S T M A I N S T R E E T A S P E N, C O L O R A D O 8 1 6 1 1
SHEET TITLE
BILL POSS AND ASSOCIATES,
ARCHITECTURE AND PLANNING, P.C.
THE INFORMATION AND DESIGN INTENT CONTAINED ON THIS DOCUMENT IS THE
PROPERTY OF BILL POSS AND ASSOCIATES, ARCHITECTURE AND PLANNING, P.C.
NO PART OF THIS INFORMATION MAY BE USED WITHOUT THE PRIOR WRITTEN
PERMISSION OF BILL POSS AND ASSOCIATES, ARCHITECTURE AND PLANNING, P.C.
BILL POSS AND ASSOCIATES, ARCHITECTURE AND PLANNING, P.C. SHALL RETAIN
ALL COMMON LAW STATUTORY AND OTHER RESERVED RIGHTS, INCLUDING
COPYRIGHT THERETO.
c 2019
PROJECT NO:
Issue:
SCALE:NOT FOR CONSTRUCTIONDESIGN INTENT ONLY2/
6
/
2
0
2
4
2
:
0
7
:
4
2
P
M
MAROON CREEK CLUB -
PHASE 2
10 CLUB CIRCLE, ASPEN, CO 81611
SD21
DINING TRELLIS
22229.00
SCALE 1/8" = 1'-0"1 DINING TRELLIS - FLOOR PLAN
SCALE 1/8" = 1'-0"4 DINING TRELLIS - ROOF PLAN
SCALE 1/8" = 1'-0"2 DINING TRELLIS - EAST ELEVATION
SCALE 1/8" = 1'-0"3 DINING TRELLIS - SOUTH ELEVATION
SCALE6DINING TRELLIS - AXON. NEW
SCALE5DINING TRELLIS - AXON. OLD
NO EXTERIOR WALL MOUNTED
LIGHTING. ALL OVERHEAD LIGHTS
WILL BE DARK SKY COMPLIANT AND
MEET ALL CITY OF ASPEN CODES.
RENSON INTEGRATED LIGHTING
59
8
SD22
GYM
EXPANSION
2,434 SF
FO
L
D
I
N
G
W
I
N
D
O
W
S
FO
L
D
I
N
G
W
I
N
D
O
W
S
FO
L
D
I
N
G
W
I
N
D
O
W
SFIXED WINDOWSFOLDING WINDOWS
FO
L
D
I
N
G
W
I
N
D
O
W
SFIXED WINDOWSFOLDING WINDOWS FOLDING WINDOWS
3
SD24
GYM
EXPANSION
15
'
-
0
"
GLULAM FRAMING
TO MATCH EXISTING
ROOF SYSTEM TO
MATCH EXISTING
PARAPET TO
MATCH EXISTING
SLOPED WINDOWS
TO MATCH EXISTING
GLULAM FRAMING
TO MATCH EXISTING
FOLDING WINDOWS
TO MATCH EXISTING
EXTERIOR WALL TO
MATCH EXISTING
120'-7 1/8"
MATCH EXISTING
122'-7 1/2"
MATCH EXISTING
SLOPED ROOF TO
MATCH EXISTING
Consultant
ARCHITECTURE PLANNING+
( T ) 9 7 0 / 9 2 5 4 7 5 5 ( F ) 9 7 0 / 9 2 0 2 9 5 0
6 0 5 E A S T M A I N S T R E E T A S P E N, C O L O R A D O 8 1 6 1 1
SHEET TITLE
BILL POSS AND ASSOCIATES,
ARCHITECTURE AND PLANNING, P.C.
THE INFORMATION AND DESIGN INTENT CONTAINED ON THIS DOCUMENT IS THE
PROPERTY OF BILL POSS AND ASSOCIATES, ARCHITECTURE AND PLANNING, P.C.
NO PART OF THIS INFORMATION MAY BE USED WITHOUT THE PRIOR WRITTEN
PERMISSION OF BILL POSS AND ASSOCIATES, ARCHITECTURE AND PLANNING, P.C.
BILL POSS AND ASSOCIATES, ARCHITECTURE AND PLANNING, P.C. SHALL RETAIN
ALL COMMON LAW STATUTORY AND OTHER RESERVED RIGHTS, INCLUDING
COPYRIGHT THERETO.
c 2019
PROJECT NO:
Issue:
SCALE:NOT FOR CONSTRUCTIONDESIGN INTENT ONLY2/
5
/
2
0
2
4
1
2
:
1
7
:
3
5
P
M
MAROON CREEK CLUB -
PHASE 2
10 CLUB CIRCLE, ASPEN, CO 81611
SD22
GYM EXPANSION
22229.00
SCALE 1/4" = 1'-0"1 GYM EXPANSION - PLAN
SCALE5GYM PERSPECTIVE - CLOSED
SCALE 1/4" = 1'-0"8 GYM - SECTION
SCALE2GYM AXON - NW OPEN
SCALE3GYM AXON - NW CLOSED
SCALE7GYM AXON - SW CLOSED
SCALE6GYM AXON - SW OPEN
SCALE9GYM PERSPECTIVE - OPEN
SCALE4GYM AXON - NW EXISTING
NO EXTERIOR WALL MOUNTED
LIGHTING. ALL OVERHEAD LIGHTS
WILL BE DARK SKY COMPLIANT AND
MEET ALL CITY OF ASPEN CODES.60
FOLDING WINDOWS
KITCHEN
EXPANSION
1,003 SF
EXISTING
KITCHEN
SD23
2
GYM
EXPANSION
KITCHEN
EXPANSION
METAL STANDING SEAM ROOF
TO MATCH EXISTING
HORIZONTAL WOOD SIDNING
TO MATCH EXISTING
WOOD GLULAM COLUMNS AND
BEAMS TO MATCH EXISTING
Consultant
ARCHITECTURE PLANNING+
( T ) 9 7 0 / 9 2 5 4 7 5 5 ( F ) 9 7 0 / 9 2 0 2 9 5 0
6 0 5 E A S T M A I N S T R E E T A S P E N, C O L O R A D O 8 1 6 1 1
SHEET TITLE
BILL POSS AND ASSOCIATES,
ARCHITECTURE AND PLANNING, P.C.
THE INFORMATION AND DESIGN INTENT CONTAINED ON THIS DOCUMENT IS THE
PROPERTY OF BILL POSS AND ASSOCIATES, ARCHITECTURE AND PLANNING, P.C.
NO PART OF THIS INFORMATION MAY BE USED WITHOUT THE PRIOR WRITTEN
PERMISSION OF BILL POSS AND ASSOCIATES, ARCHITECTURE AND PLANNING, P.C.
BILL POSS AND ASSOCIATES, ARCHITECTURE AND PLANNING, P.C. SHALL RETAIN
ALL COMMON LAW STATUTORY AND OTHER RESERVED RIGHTS, INCLUDING
COPYRIGHT THERETO.
c 2019
PROJECT NO:
Issue:
SCALE:
2/
5
/
2
0
2
4
1
2
:
1
7
:
3
8
P
M
MAROON CREEK CLUB -
PHASE 2
10 CLUB CIRCLE, ASPEN, CO 81611
SD23
KITCHEN EXPANSION
22229.00
SCALE 1/4" = 1'-0"1 KITCHEN EXPANSION FLOOR PLAN
SCALE 1/8" = 1'-0"2 KITCHEN EXPANSION ELEVATION
SCALE3KITCHEN - AXON. NEW
SCALE4KITCHEN - AXON. OLD
NO EXTERIOR WALL MOUNTED
LIGHTING. ALL OVERHEAD LIGHTS
WILL BE DARK SKY COMPLIANT AND
MEET ALL CITY OF ASPEN CODES.
61
3
SD24
BALLASTED ROOF
SKYLIGHTS
1,557 SF
GLULAM FRAMING TO MATCH EXISTING
SKYLIGHTS ABOVE
3
SD24
8'
-
0
"
24
'
-
0
"
8'
-
0
"
16
'
-
0
"
16
'
-
0
"
16
'
-
0
"
16
'
-
0
"
8'-0"
12'-0"
6'-0"
1'
-
8
"
10
'
-
7
1
/
2
"
GLULAM FRAMING
TO MATCH EXISTING
SKYLIGHTBALLASTED ROOF ON
WOOD SUBSTRATE
Consultant
ARCHITECTURE PLANNING+
( T ) 9 7 0 / 9 2 5 4 7 5 5 ( F ) 9 7 0 / 9 2 0 2 9 5 0
6 0 5 E A S T M A I N S T R E E T A S P E N, C O L O R A D O 8 1 6 1 1
SHEET TITLE
BILL POSS AND ASSOCIATES,
ARCHITECTURE AND PLANNING, P.C.
THE INFORMATION AND DESIGN INTENT CONTAINED ON THIS DOCUMENT IS THE
PROPERTY OF BILL POSS AND ASSOCIATES, ARCHITECTURE AND PLANNING, P.C.
NO PART OF THIS INFORMATION MAY BE USED WITHOUT THE PRIOR WRITTEN
PERMISSION OF BILL POSS AND ASSOCIATES, ARCHITECTURE AND PLANNING, P.C.
BILL POSS AND ASSOCIATES, ARCHITECTURE AND PLANNING, P.C. SHALL RETAIN
ALL COMMON LAW STATUTORY AND OTHER RESERVED RIGHTS, INCLUDING
COPYRIGHT THERETO.
c 2019
PROJECT NO:
Issue:
SCALE:
2/
5
/
2
0
2
4
5
:
0
1
:
2
1
P
M
MAROON CREEK CLUB -
PHASE 2
10 CLUB CIRCLE, ASPEN, CO 81611
SD24
COVERED FITNESS
22229.00
SCALE 3/16" = 1'-0"2 COVERED FITNESS - ROOF PLAN
SCALE 3/16" = 1'-0"1 COVERED FITNESS - FLOOR PLAN
SCALE4COVERED FITNESS - AXON NEW
SCALE 3/16" = 1'-0"3 COVERED FITNESS - SECTION
SCALE5COVERED FITNESS - AXON OLD
NO EXTERIOR WALL MOUNTED
LIGHTING. ALL OVERHEAD LIGHTS
WILL BE DARK SKY COMPLIANT AND
MEET ALL CITY OF ASPEN CODES.
62
EVENT
SPACE
1,080 SF
4'-0
"
16'
-
0
"
16'
-
0
"
4'-0
"
1'-
6"
24
'-0"
1'-
6"
GLULAM FRAMING
TO MATCH EXISTING
SKYLIGHTS
ABOVE
EXTEND HARDSCAPE
14
'
-
1
1
"
8'-3 3/4"8'-4 3/4"8'-3 3/4"
GLULAM FRAMING
TO MATCH EXISTING
BALLASTED ROOF ON
WOOD SUBSTRATE
SKYLIGHTS
SKYLIGHTS
BALLASTED ROOF
Consultant
ARCHITECTURE PLANNING+
( T ) 9 7 0 / 9 2 5 4 7 5 5 ( F ) 9 7 0 / 9 2 0 2 9 5 0
6 0 5 E A S T M A I N S T R E E T A S P E N, C O L O R A D O 8 1 6 1 1
SHEET TITLE
BILL POSS AND ASSOCIATES,
ARCHITECTURE AND PLANNING, P.C.
THE INFORMATION AND DESIGN INTENT CONTAINED ON THIS DOCUMENT IS THE
PROPERTY OF BILL POSS AND ASSOCIATES, ARCHITECTURE AND PLANNING, P.C.
NO PART OF THIS INFORMATION MAY BE USED WITHOUT THE PRIOR WRITTEN
PERMISSION OF BILL POSS AND ASSOCIATES, ARCHITECTURE AND PLANNING, P.C.
BILL POSS AND ASSOCIATES, ARCHITECTURE AND PLANNING, P.C. SHALL RETAIN
ALL COMMON LAW STATUTORY AND OTHER RESERVED RIGHTS, INCLUDING
COPYRIGHT THERETO.
c 2019
PROJECT NO:
Issue:
SCALE:
2/
5
/
2
0
2
4
5
:
0
1
:
2
6
P
M
MAROON CREEK CLUB -
PHASE 2
10 CLUB CIRCLE, ASPEN, CO 81611
SD25
EVENT SPACE
22229.00
SCALE 1/4" = 1'-0"1 EVENT SPACE - FLOOR PLAN
SCALE4EVENT SPACE - AXON
SCALE 1/4" = 1'-0"3 EVENT SPACE - SECTION
SCALE 1/4" = 1'-0"2 EVENT SPACE - ROOF PLAN
NO EXTERIOR WALL MOUNTED
LIGHTING. ALL OVERHEAD LIGHTS
WILL BE DARK SKY COMPLIANT AND
MEET ALL CITY OF ASPEN CODES.63
Consultant
ARCHITECTURE PLANNING+
( T ) 9 7 0 / 9 2 5 4 7 5 5 ( F ) 9 7 0 / 9 2 0 2 9 5 0
6 0 5 E A S T M A I N S T R E E T A S P E N, C O L O R A D O 8 1 6 1 1
SHEET TITLE
BILL POSS AND ASSOCIATES,
ARCHITECTURE AND PLANNING, P.C.
THE INFORMATION AND DESIGN INTENT CONTAINED ON THIS DOCUMENT IS THE
PROPERTY OF BILL POSS AND ASSOCIATES, ARCHITECTURE AND PLANNING, P.C.
NO PART OF THIS INFORMATION MAY BE USED WITHOUT THE PRIOR WRITTEN
PERMISSION OF BILL POSS AND ASSOCIATES, ARCHITECTURE AND PLANNING, P.C.
BILL POSS AND ASSOCIATES, ARCHITECTURE AND PLANNING, P.C. SHALL RETAIN
ALL COMMON LAW STATUTORY AND OTHER RESERVED RIGHTS, INCLUDING
COPYRIGHT THERETO.
c 2019
PROJECT NO:
Issue:
SCALE:
3/
1
5
/
2
0
2
4
1
1
:
3
2
:
0
2
A
M
MAROON CREEK CLUB -
PHASE 2
10 CLUB CIRCLE, ASPEN, CO 81611
SD26
ENLARGED MATERIAL
PHOTOS
22229.00
TIMBER COLUMNS, METAL FLASHING, METAL FRAMED WINDOWS STANDING SEAM METAL ROOFING
HORIZONTAL WOOD SIDINGTRELLIS BRONZE METALMETAL ROOFING, TIMBER COLUMNS, STONE WALLS,
CONCRETE HARDSCAPE
RENSON INTEGRATED LIGHTING
64
118
Lighting
You can choose between cool or warm
white lighting to create the desired
mood and feeling. Moreover, the LED
lighting in most patio covers can be
dimmed so that the intensity of the
lighting can be adjusted to the situa-
tion. The lighting for Lapure is integrat-
ed into the roof structure. You can opt
for LED lighting that is integrated into
the roof blades in Camargue Line, Al-
garve Line, and Aero Line. Upwards
or downwards lighting can also be pro-
vided on the inside of the frame. With
Camargue and Camargue Skye, at-
mospheric lighting is also available in
the columns.
You can choose between warm white
light (perfect for cozy gatherings with
friends), pure white light (perfect for
reading) and RGB (only available as
uplighting in the frame) to create the
desired mood and feeling. Moreover,
the LED lighting can be dimmed so
that the intensity of the lighting can be
adjusted to the situation. The Renson®
LED lighting’s exceptionally durable
quality ensures even lighting without
any bright spots. Algarve Canvas and
Camargue Skye can be equipped with
atmospheric Up-Down LED lighting
When it starts to get dark, you simply switch on the integrated lighting. The choice of lighting lets you create the desired
mood and feeling.
You can continue to enjoy your patio, even when it starts getting colder. Heating elements can be provided to make this
possible. The radiated heat ensures an even distribution of warmth throughout the space with a minimum of heat loss. And
thanks to the integrated flat panel speakers, you can even enjoy your favourite music on your patio.
LIGHTING, HEATING, AND MUSIC
ENJOY EVERY MOMENT OF THE DAY.
Aero® 65
119
Warm white light Pure white light RGB (color)Dimmable
Lineo® LED Light*3 3 3
Colomno LED Light**3 3 3
UpDown LED Light**
Upwards 3 3 3 3
UpDown LED Light**
Downwards 3 3 3
Lapure® LED Light*3 3 3
* Warm white: 506lm/ft (55 LEDs/ft) / Pure white: 506lm/ft (55 LEDs/ft)
** Warm white: 168-207lm/ft (37 LEDs/ft) / Pure white: 168-207lm/ft (37LEDs/ft)
RGB: 168-213lm/ft (18LEDs/ft)
Colomno LED Light
LED lighting integrated into the columns - Camargue Line. A maximum of one
LED strip can be incorporate into each column (on the inside of the beam). There
can be a total of four columns fitted with integrated LED Light lighting per roof
section.
Integrated column lighting
UpDown LED Light
Integrated LED lighting on the inside of the frame. Fitted with lighting running
upwards and/or downwards. This lets you create indirect or direct atmospheric
lighting with the Camargue Line, Algarve Line, and Aero Line. A total of two
UpDown LED lighting modules can be installed per roof section. This can be done
on either the pivot side or the span side.
Upwards lighting
Downwards lighting
Lineo LED Light
LED lighting integrated into the blades - Camargue, Algarve, and Aero. Even
distribution without visible bright spots thanks to high-quality LEDs (55 per foot).
Lapure® LED Light
LED lighting integrated into the Lapure cross-beam.
Even distribution without visible bright spots thanks to high-quality LEDs (55 per
foot).
AL
U
M
I
N
U
M
PE
R
G
O
L
A
S
CU
S
T
O
M
I
Z
A
T
I
O
N
/
A
C
C
E
S
S
O
R
I
E
S
66
Maroon Creek Club Phase 3, Aspen, Colorado February 29, 2024
Engineering Report
Engineering Report
MAROON CREEK CLUB PHASE 3
ASPEN, CO
February 29, 2024
Prepared by
D, PE
Roaring Fork Engineering
592 Highway 133
Carbondale, CO 81623
Exhibit B3
67
Engineering Report i
Table of Contents
1.0 General ................................................................................................................................... 1
2.0 Proposed Improvements ......................................................................................................... 1
3.0 Utilities..................................................................................................................................... 2
68
Engineering Report ii
List of Appendices
Appendix A – Site Plan
69
Engineering Report 1
1.0 General
1.1 Existing Conditions
Roaring Fork Engineering (RFE) has prepared this report for a major PD amendment for the
Maroon Creek Club in Aspen, Colorado. The current property consists of the main club house,
outdoor recreational and lap swim pool areas, tennis and pickleball courts, asphalt parking
areas, and numerous concrete sidewalks, pathways, and patios. The property is vegetated with
mostly native grass, lawn areas and numerous mature trees.
2.0 Proposed Improvements
2.1 Proposed Site Plan
The proposed site improvements include the construction of new trellis/canopy areas for an
event space near the recreational pool, an outdoor workout location on the west of the club
house and covered outdoor dining areas on the southeast side of the building. Improvements
also include the expansion of the existing gym on the northwest corner of the clubhouse. A site
plan can be found in Appendix A.
2.2 Grading and Drainage
All The drainage design for Maroon Creek Club Phase 3 Improvements will comply with all City
of Aspen Rules and Regulations. The methodology, calculations, and proposed drainage
mitigation measures will be in accordance with the City of Aspen Urban Runoff Management
Plan (URMP). All newly expanded impervious areas will be designed to drain to water quality
control volume treatment structures in accordance with the URMP
Low Impact Development (LID) aims to mimic the natural pre-development hydrologic pattern.
The goal is to manage storm water as close to its source as is possible. The treatment train
approach will be used where feasible to increase water quality and percolation.
Principle 1: Consider storm water quality needs early in the design process.
The Grading and Drainage design will be coordinated between the architect, landscape
architect and civil engineering teams throughout the design process and water quality
requirements were discussed early on.
Principle 2: Use the entire site when planning for storm water quality treatment.
Storm water quality was considered in the design of every part of the site that is being affected
by the proposed construction. Surface treatment will be used to the maximum extent possible.
Principle 3: Avoid unnecessary impervious area.
70
Engineering Report 2
The total impervious area on the site was kept to a minimum while meeting the architectural
design goals by incorporating pervious landscaped areas, pervious pavers, and other pervious
surfaces throughout the site.
Principle 4: Reduce runoff rates and volumes to more closely match natural conditions.
All runoff from new impervious surfaces on the property is collected and routed to a drywell.
This system has been sized to capture and infiltrate the full 100-year developed runoff rate.
Principle 5: Integrate storm water quality management and flood control.
The use of a drywell for storage acts to integrate a water quality BMP with flood control methods
to limit downstream impact.
Principle 6: Develop storm water quality facilities that enhance the site, the community
and the environment.
The use of a drywell for water quality reduces the runoff of sediment and contaminants from the
site while treating runoff on the surface. This reduces the site’s effect on Maroon Creek and the
Roaring Fork River.
Principle 7: Use a treatment train approach.
The use of a treatment train approach in which stormwater passes over pervious surfaces
before entering the storm system will be incorporated at all locations possible.
2.3 Access
Access to the club and proposed improvements will remain as the existing condition, with
parking lot access off Harmony Rd to the north and main clubhouse access off Stage Road to
the east. No new access will be necessary for the improvement locations.
3.0 Utilities
3.1 Domestic Water
No improvements to the domestic water supply system are proposed.
3.2 Sanitary Sewer
No improvements to the sanitary sewer system are proposed.
3.3 Electric
Any electrical service upgrades for the proposed improvements will be shown on the
architectural design documents.
3.4 Gas
Any gas service upgrades for the proposed improvements will be shown on the architectural
design documents.
71
Engineering Report 3
3.5 Communications
No communication improvements are proposed.
72
Engineering Report 1
Appendix
73
Engineering Report 2
Appendix A – Site Plan
74
1
Phase 3 Site Plan
CHECKED BY:
#
DE
S
C
R
I
P
T
I
O
N
DR
A
W
N
B
Y
CONSTRUCTION
DRAWN BY:
JOB # 2019-52
NOT FOR
RO
A
R
I
N
G
F
O
R
K
E
N
G
I
N
E
E
R
I
N
G
59
2
H
I
G
H
W
A
Y
1
3
3
CA
R
B
O
N
D
A
L
E
,
C
O
8
1
6
2
3
PH
:
(
9
7
0
)
3
4
0
-
4
1
3
0
DCS
ADW
MA
R
O
O
N
C
R
E
E
K
C
L
U
B
AS
P
E
N
,
C
O
L
O
R
A
D
O
N
W E
S
75
CITY OF ASPEN COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT
City of Aspen|130 S. Galena St.|(970) 920 5090 April 2020
LAND USE APPLICATION
APPLICANT:
REPRESENTIVATIVE:
Description: Existing and Proposed Conditions
Review: Administrative or Board Review
Net Leasable square footage Lodge Pillows Free Market dwelling units
Affordable Housing dwelling units Essential Public Facility square footage
FEES DUE: $
Pre-Application Conference Summary
Signed Fee Agreement
HOA Compliance form
All items listed in checklist on PreApplication Conference Summary
Name:
Address:
Phone#: email:
Address:
Phone #: email:
Name:
Project Name and Address:
Parcel ID # (REQUIRED)
Required Land Use Review(s):
Growth Management Quota System (GMQS) required fields:
BendonAdams
300 So. Spring St #202; Aspen, CO 81611
970.925.2855 chris@bendonadams.com
x
x
x
x
na
Have you included the following?
na
na na
5,850
Maroon Creek Club PD Amendment
2735-023-09-051
Maroon Creek Club Limited Liability Company, LLC
c/o Maroon Creek Investors LLC, Manager
10 Club Circle; Aspen, CO 81611
970.925.1936 ahecht@garfieldhecht.com
na
Exhibit C1
Existing golf and tennis club. Proposed expansion.
76
CITY OF ASPEN COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMEN
Agreement to Pay Application Fees
An agreement between the City of Aspen ("City") and
Address of Property: 10 Club Circle; Aspen, CO Please type or print in all caps
M C k LLC BendonAdams Property Owner Name: aroon ree Representative Name(if different from Property Owner) _________ _ a Colorado limited liability company Billing Name and Address -Send Bills to: c/o Andrew Hecht· Maroon Creek LLC · , ,
62 5 e. Hyman Ave #20 1; Aspen, CO 81611
Contact info for billing: e-mail: ahecht@garfieldhecht.com Phone: 970.925.1936
I understand that the City has adopted, via Ordinance No. 30, Series of 2017, review fees for Land Use applications and
payment of these fees is a condition precedent to determining application completeness. I understand that as the property
owner that I am responsible for paying all fees for this development application.
For flat fees and referral fees: I agree to pay the following fees for the services indicated. I understand that these flat fees are
non-refundable.
$. 975 Parks flat fee for ______ _ $. _____ flat fee for ___________ _
$. _____ flat fee for ______ _ $. _____ flat fee for ___________ _
For Deposit cases only: The City and I understand that because of the size, nature or scope of the proposed project, it is not
possible at this time to know the full extent or total costs involved in processing the application. I understand that additional
costs over and above the deposit may accrue. I understand and agree that it is impracticable for City staff to complete
processing, review and presentation of sufficient information to enable legally required findings to be made for project
consideration, unless invoices are paid in full.
The City and I understand and agree that invoices mailed by the City to the above listed billing address and not returned to
the City shall be considered by the City as being received by me. I agree to remit payment within 30 days of presentation of
an invoice by the City for such services.
I have read, understood, and agree to the Land Use Review Fee Policy including consequences for no-payment. I agree to pay
the following initial deposit amounts for the specified hours of staff time. I understand that payment of a deposit does not
render and application complete or compliant with approval criteria. If actual recorded costs exceed the initial deposit, I
agree to pay additional monthly billings to the City to reimburse the City for the processing of my application at the hourly
rates hereinafter stated.
$ 4,550 deposit for 14 hours of Community Development Department staff time. Additional time
above the deposit amount will be billed at $325.00 per hour.
325 1 $ _______ deposit for ______ hours of Engineering Department staff time. Additional time above the
deposit amount will be billed at $325.00 per hour.
City of Aspen:
Ben Anderson, AICP
Com munity Development Director
City Use:
Fees Due: $ ___ Received$ __ _
Case# __________ _
Signature:
PRINT Name:
Title:
Andrew Hecht, Manager
Maroon Creek Investors LLC, Manager
Maroon Creek Limited Liability Company LLC
April 2020 City of Aspen I 130 S. Galena St. I (970) 920 5090
Exhibit C2
77
Exhibit C3
78
Exhibit C4
79
Exhibit C5
80
Customer Distribution
Prevent fraud - Please call a member of our closing team for wire transfer
instructions or to initiate a wire transfer. Note that our wiring instructions will
never change.
Order Number: Q62014635-3 Date: 02/07/2024
Property Address: 10 CLUB CIR, ASPEN, CO 81611
For Closing Assistance For Title Assistance
Land Title Roaring Fork Valley
Title Team
533 E HOPKINS #102
ASPEN, CO 81611
(970) 927-0405 (Work)
(970) 925-0610 (Work Fax)
valleyresponse@ltgc.com
Seller/Owner
MAROON CREEK LLC
Delivered via: No Commitment Delivery
BENDONADAMS
Attention: CHRIS BENDON
300 S SPRING STREET SUITE 202
ASPEN, CO 81611
(970) 925-2855 (Work)
chris@bendonadams.com
Delivered via: Electronic Mail
Exhibit C6
81
Estimate of Title Fees
Order Number: Q62014635-3 Date: 02/07/2024
Property Address: 10 CLUB CIR, ASPEN, CO 81611
Seller(s): MAROON CREEK LIMITED LIABILITY COMPANY, A COLORADO LIMITED
LIABILITY COMPANY
Buyer(s): TO BE DETERMINED
Thank you for putting your trust in Land Title. Below is the estimate of title fees for the
transaction. The final fees will be collected at closing. Visit ltgc.com to learn more about
Land Title.
Estimate of Title Insurance Fees
"TBD" Commitment $265.00
TBD - TBD Income $-265.00
TOTAL $0.00
Note: The documents linked in this commitment should be reviewed carefully. These
documents, such as covenants conditions and restrictions, may affect the title, ownership and
use of the property. You may wish to engage legal assistance in order to fully understand and
be aware of the implications of the documents on your property.
Chain of Title Documents:
Pitkin county recorded 02/17/1994 under reception no. 367054 at book 742 page 100
Pitkin county recorded 03/18/1999 under reception no. 428927
Pitkin county recorded 03/18/1999 under reception no. 428928
Pitkin county recorded 02/18/2000 under reception no. 440670
Pitkin county recorded 02/04/2002 under reception no. 463581
Pitkin county recorded 02/04/2002 under reception no. 463582
Pitkin county recorded 11/30/2011 under reception no. 584725
Pitkin county recorded 11/30/2011 under reception no. 584727
Plat Map(s):
82
Pitkin county recorded 11/15/1993 at book 33 page 4
Pitkin county recorded 03/31/1994 at book 34 page 23
Pitkin county recorded 09/27/1996 under reception no. 397484 at book 40 page 61
Pitkin county recorded 08/09/2002 under reception no. 470808 at book 61 page 89
83
Copyright 2006-2024 American Land Title Association. All rights reserved.
The use of this Form is restricted to ALTA licensees and ALTA members in good standing
as of the date of use. All other uses are prohibited. Reprinted under license from the
American Land Title Association.
Property Address:
10 CLUB CIR, ASPEN, CO 81611
1.Effective Date:
01/26/2024 at 5:00 P.M.
2.Policy to be Issued and Proposed Insured:
"TBD" Commitment
Proposed Insured:
TO BE DETERMINED
$0.00
3.The estate or interest in the land described or referred to in this Commitment and covered herein is:
A FEE SIMPLE
4.Title to the estate or interest covered herein is at the effective date hereof vested in:
MAROON CREEK LIMITED LIABILITY COMPANY, A COLORADO LIMITED LIABILITY COMPANY
5.The Land referred to in this Commitment is described as follows:
LOT 51,
MAROON CREEK CLUB,
ACCORDING TO THE FINAL PLAT AND PUD FOR MAROON CREEK CLUB, RECORDED NOVEMBER 15,
1993 IN PLAT BOOK 33 AT PAGE 4 AND AS PARTIALLY CORRECTED BY INSTRUMENT RECORDED
MARCH 31, 1994 IN PLAT BOOK 34 AT PAGE 23 AND MAP RECORDED SEPTEMBER 27, 1996 IN PLAT
BOOK 40 AT PAGE 61 AND FURTHER AMENDED BY HARMONY ROAD PLAT RECORDED AUGUST 9, 2002
IN PLAT BOOK 61 AT PAGE 89.
COUNTY OF PITKIN,
STATE OF COLORADO.
ALTA COMMITMENT
Old Republic National Title Insurance Company
Schedule A
Order Number:Q62014635-3
84
ALTA COMMITMENT
Old Republic National Title Insurance Company
Schedule B, Part I
(Requirements)
Order Number: Q62014635-3
All of the following Requirements must be met:
This proposed Insured must notify the Company in writing of the name of any party not referred to in this
Commitment who will obtain an interest in the Land or who will make a loan on the Land. The Company
may then make additional Requirements or Exceptions.
Pay the agreed amount for the estate or interest to be insured.
Pay the premiums, fees, and charges for the Policy to the Company.
Documents satisfactory to the Company that convey the Title or create the Mortgage to be insured, or
both, must be properly authorized, executed, delivered, and recorded in the Public Records.
1.RELEASE OF DEED OF TRUST DATED OCTOBER 08, 1996 FROM MAROON CREEK LIMITED LIABILITY
COMPANY, A COLORADO LIMITED LIABILITY COMPANY TO THE PUBLIC TRUSTEE OF PITKIN COUNTY
FOR THE USE OF CAROLINA FIRST BANK TO SECURE THE SUM OF $4,900,000.00 RECORDED OCTOBER
16, 1996, UNDER RECEPTION NO. 398113.
2.RELEASE OF DEED OF TRUST DATED NOVEMBER 12, 1996 FROM MAROON CREEK LIMITED LIABILITY
COMPANY, A COLORADO LIMITED LIABILITY COMPANY TO THE PUBLIC TRUSTEE OF PITKIN COUNTY
FOR THE USE OF CAROLINA FIRST BANK TO SECURE THE SUM OF $4,900,000.00 RECORDED
NOVEMBER 27, 1996, UNDER RECEPTION NO. 399476.
3.PARTIAL RELEASE OF DEED OF TRUST DATED OCTOBER 15, 1997 FROM MAROON CREEK LIMITED
LIABILITY COMPANY, A COLORADO LIMITED LIABILITY COMPANY TO THE PUBLIC TRUSTEE OF PITKIN
COUNTY FOR THE USE OF TEXTRON FINANCIAL CORPORATION TO SECURE THE SUM OF
$15,000,000.00 RECORDED OCTOBER 15, 1997, UNDER RECEPTION NO. 409454.
SAID DEED OF TRUST WAS FURTHER SECURED IN ASSIGNMENT OF RENTS RECORDED OCTOBER 15,
1997, UNDER RECEPTION NO. 409455.
AMENDMENT AGREEMENT IN CONNECTION WITH SAID DEED OF TRUST WAS RECORDED APRIL 04,
2002 UNDER RECEPTION NO. 465963.
AMENDMENT AGREEMENT IN CONNECTION WITH SAID DEED OF TRUST WAS RECORDED AUGUST 31,
1999, UNDER RECEPTION NO. 435077.
AMENDMENT AGREEMENT IN CONNECTION WITH SAID DEED OF TRUST WAS RECORDED MAY 20, 1999
UNDER RECEPTION NO. 431337.
4.PARTIAL TERMINATION OF FINANCING STATEMENT BY ANB BANK, THE SECURED PARTY, RECORDED
FEBRUARY 21, 2014, UNDER RECEPTION NO. 608128 AND CONTINUED BY AMENDMENT RECORDED
DECEMBER 28, 2018 UNDER RECEPTION NO. 653005 AND AS CONTINUED BY AMENDMENT RECORDED
JANUARY 5, 2024 AS RECEPTION NO. 699775.
5.PARTIAL RELEASE OF DEED OF TRUST DATED FEBRUARY 13, 2014, FROM MAROON CREEK LIMITED
LIABILITY COMPANY, A COLORADO LIMITED LIABILITY COMPANY TO THE PUBLIC TRUSTEE OF PITKIN
COUNTY FOR THE USE OF ANB BANK TO SECURE THE SUM OF $6,000,000.00 RECORDED FEBRUARY
14, 2014, UNDER RECEPTION NO. 607993.
MODIFICATION AGREEMENT IN CONNECTION WITH SAID DEED OF TRUST WAS RECORDED APRIL 10,
2017 UNDER RECEPTION NO. 637434.
MODIFICATION AGREEMENT IN CONNECTION WITH SAID DEED OF TRUST WAS RECORDED MARCH 12,
2018 UNDER RECEPTION NO. 645754.
MODIFICATION AGREEMENT IN CONNECTION WITH SAID DEED OF TRUST WAS RECORDED DECEMBER
21, 2020 UNDER RECEPTION NO. 671744.
THIS COMMITMENT IS FOR INFORMATION ONLY, AND NO POLICY WILL BE ISSUED PURSUANT HERETO.
85
This commitment does not republish any covenants, condition, restriction, or limitation contained in any
document referred to in this commitment to the extent that the specific covenant, conditions, restriction,
or limitation violates state or federal law based on race, color, religion, sex, sexual orientation, gender
identity, handicap, familial status, or national origin.
1.Any facts, rights, interests, or claims thereof, not shown by the Public Records but that could be
ascertained by an inspection of the Land or that may be asserted by persons in possession of the Land.
2.Easements, liens or encumbrances, or claims thereof, not shown by the Public Records.
3.Any encroachment, encumbrance, violation, variation, or adverse circumstance affecting the Title that
would be disclosed by an accurate and complete land survey of the Land and not shown by the Public
Records.
4.Any lien, or right to a lien, for services, labor or material heretofore or hereafter furnished, imposed by
law and not shown by the Public Records.
5.Defects, liens, encumbrances, adverse claims or other matters, if any, created, first appearing in the
public records or attaching subsequent to the effective date hereof but prior to the date of the proposed
insured acquires of record for value the estate or interest or mortgage thereon covered by this
Commitment.
6.(a) Taxes or assessments that are not shown as existing liens by the records of any taxing authority that
levies taxes or assessments on real property or by the Public Records; (b) proceedings by a public
agency that may result in taxes or assessments, or notices of such proceedings, whether or not shown
by the records of such agency or by the Public Records.
7.(a) Unpatented mining claims; (b) reservations or exceptions in patents or in Acts authorizing the
issuance thereof; (c) water rights, claims or title to water.
8.RIGHT OF PROPRIETOR OF A VEIN OR LODE TO EXTRACT AND REMOVE HIS ORE THEREFROM
SHOULD THE SAME BE FOUND TO PENETRATE OR INTERSECT THE PREMISES AS RESERVED IN
UNITED STATES PATENT RECORDED MAY 20, 1953 IN BOOK 180 AT PAGE 155.
9.RIGHT OF WAY FOR DITCHES OR CANALS CONSTRUCTED BY THE AUTHORITY OF THE UNITED
STATES AS RESERVED IN UNITED STATES PATENT RECORDED JUNE 16, 1944 IN BOOK 167 AT PAGE
562, AND RECORDED MAY 20, 1953 IN BOOK 180 AT PAGE 155.
10.TERMS, CONDITIONS AND PROVISIONS OF RESOLUTION NO. 93-104 RECORDED AUGUST 13, 1993 IN
BOOK 721 AT PAGE 245.
11.TERMS, CONDITIONS, AND PROVISIONS OF SUBDIVIDER'S AGREEMENT AS CONTAINED IN
INSTRUMENT RECORDED NOVEMBER 12, 1993, IN BOOK 730 AT PAGE 606 AND AMENDMENT
RECORDED MARCH 10, 2000 UNDER RECEPTION NO. 441279.
12.TERMS, CONDITIONS AND PROVISIONS OF PUBLIC ACCESS EASEMENT RECORDED NOVEMBER 12,
1993 IN BOOK 730 AT PAGE 655.
13.TERMS, CONDITIONS AND PROVISIONS OF DEDICATION AGREEMENT FOR ROADS RECORDED
NOVEMBER 12, 1993 IN BOOK 730 AT PAGE 662.
14.TERMS, CONDITIONS AND PROVISIONS OF AVIGATION EASEMENT RECORDED NOVEMBER 12, 1993 IN
BOOK 730 AT PAGE 690.
15.TERMS, CONDITIONS AND PROVISIONS OF WATER SERVICE AGREEMENT RECORDED NOVEMBER 15,
1993 IN BOOK 730 AT PAGE 797.
ALTA COMMITMENT
Old Republic National Title Insurance Company
Schedule B, Part II
(Exceptions)
Order Number: Q62014635-3
86
16.TERMS, CONDITIONS, PROVISIONS AND OBLIGATIONS OF AGREEMENT RECORDED NOVEMBER 15,
1993 IN BOOK 731 AT PAGE 52.
17.EASEMENTS, RIGHTS OF WAY AND OTHER MATTERS AS SET FORTH ON THE PLAT OF SUBJECT
PROPERTY RECORDED NOVEMBER 15, 1993 IN PLAT BOOK 33 AT PAGE 4 AND AS PARTIALLY
CORRECTED BY INSTRUMENT RECORDED MARCH 31, 1994 IN PLAT BOOK 34 AT PAGE 23 AND MAP
RECORDED SEPTEMBER 27, 1996 UNDER RECEPTION NO. 397484 AND FURTHER AMENDED BY
HARMONY ROAD PLAT RECORDED AUGUST 9, 2002 IN PLAT BOOK 61 AT PAGE 89.
18.MASTER DECLARATION OF PROTECTIVE COVENANTS FOR MAROON CREEK CLUB, WHICH DO NOT
CONTAIN A FORFEITURE OR REVERTER CLAUSE, BUT OMITTING ANY COVENANTS OR
RESTRICTIONS, IF ANY, BASED UPON RACE, COLOR, RELIGION, SEX, SEXUAL ORIENTATION,
FAMILIAL STATUS, MARITAL STATUS, DISABILITY, HANDICAP, NATIONAL ORIGIN, ANCESTRY, OR
SOURCE OF INCOME, AS SET FORTH IN APPLICABLE STATE OR FEDERAL LAWS, EXCEPT TO THE
EXTENT THAT SAID COVENANT OR RESTRICTION IS PERMITTED BY APPLICABLE LAW AS CONTAINED
IN INSTRUMENT RECORDED DECEMBER 02, 1993, IN BOOK 733 AT PAGE 598 AND AS AMENDED IN
INSTRUMENT RECORDED FEBRUARY 17, 1994, IN BOOK 742 AT PAGE 83 AND SECOND AMENDMENT
RECORDED JUNE 8, 1994 IN BOOK 752 AT PAGE 754 AND THIRD AMENDMENT RECORDED JULY 19,
1994 IN BOOK 755 AT PAGE 883 AND AMENDED AND RESTATED THIRD AMENDMENT RECORDED JULY
26, 1994 IN BOOK 756 AT PAGE 597 AND FOURTH AMENDMENT RECORDED SEPTEMBER 12, 1996
UNDER RECEPTION NO. 396947.
ASSIGNMENT AND DESIGNATION OF SUCCESSOR DECLARANT RECORDED MAY 11, 1994 IN BOOK 750
AT PAGE 242.
19.TERMS, CONDITIONS AND PROVISIONS OF DECLARATION OF RESTRICTIVE COVENANTS RECORDED
DECEMBER 22, 1993 IN BOOK 736 AT PAGE 335.
20.TERMS, CONDITIONS AND PROVISIONS OF TRENCH, CONDUIT, AND VAULT AGREEMENT GRANTED
TO HOLY CROSS ELECTRIC ASSOCIATION RECORDED JULY 11, 1994 AT RECEPTION NO. 371946.
21.TERMS, CONDITIONS AND PROVISIONS OF ASSIGNMENT OF ROAD MAINTENANCE AGREEMENTS
RECORDED SEPTEMBER 03, 1996 AT RECEPTION NO. 396644.
22.TERMS, CONDITIONS AND PROVISIONS OF INSUBSTANTIAL PUD AMENDMENT RECORDED
DECEMBER 19, 1996 AT RECEPTION NO. 400129.
23.TERMS, CONDITIONS AND PROVISIONS OF MAROON CREEK SUBDIVISION (SOUTH) ANNEXATION
RECORDED FEBRUARY 06, 1997 IN BOOK 41 AT PAGE 76.
24.TERMS, CONDITIONS AND PROVISIONS OF MAROON CREEK SUBDIVISION (NORTH) ANNEXATION
RECORDED FEBRUARY 6, 1997 IN BOOK 41 PAGE 77.
25.TERMS, CONDITIONS AND PROVISIONS OF EASEMENT AGREEMENT RECORDED FEBRUARY 21, 1997
AT RECEPTION NO. 401986.
26.TERMS, CONDITIONS AND PROVISIONS OF ORDINANCE# 34, SERIES OF 1996 RECORDED FEBRUARY
21, 1997 AT RECEPTION NO. 401985.
27.TERMS, CONDITIONS AND PROVISIONS OF ORDINANCE# 40, SERIES OF 1996 RECORDED APRIL 08,
1997 AT RECEPTION NO. 403224.
28.ALL MATTERS SHOWN ON THE ALTA TITLE SURVEY OF SUBJECT PROPERTY RECORDED NOVEMBER
18, 1997 UNDER RECEPTION NO. 410803.
ALTA COMMITMENT
Old Republic National Title Insurance Company
Schedule B, Part II
(Exceptions)
Order Number: Q62014635-3
87
29.TERMS, CONDITIONS AND PROVISIONS OF RESOLUTION NO. 24 RECORDED MAY 04, 1998 AT
RECEPTION NO. 416475.
30.TERMS, CONDITIONS AND PROVISIONS OF AGREEMENT RECORDED SEPTEMBER 22, 1999 AT
RECEPTION NO. 435797.
31.EASEMENTS AND RIGHTS OF WAY AS GRANTED TO HOLY CROSS ELECTRIC ASSOCIATION, INC. IN
INSTRUMENT RECORDED DECEMBER 8, 1999 UNDER RECEPTION NO. 438373.
32.TERMS, CONDITIONS AND PROVISIONS OF CONTRACT FOR SERVICE RECORDED FEBRUARY 01, 2000
AT RECEPTION NO. 440028.
33.TERMS, CONDITIONS AND PROVISIONS OF EASEMENT AGREEMENT RECORDED MARCH 05, 2003 AT
RECEPTION NO. 479574.
34.TERMS, CONDITIONS AND PROVISIONS OF HOLY CROSS ENERGY RIGHT OF WAY EASEMENT
RECORDED MARCH 16, 2006 AT RECEPTION NO. 521824.
35.TERMS, CONDITIONS AND PROVISIONS OF GRANT OF EASEMENT RECORDED NOVEMBER 03, 2008 AT
RECEPTION NO. 553987.
36.TERMS, CONDITIONS, PROVISIONS, BURDENS AND OBLIGATIONS AS SET FORTH IN RESOLUTION NO.
64 (SERIES 2018) APPROVING TENT STRUCTURES RECORDED APRIL 16, 2018 UNDER RECEPTION NO.
646596.
37.TERMS, CONDITIONS AND PROVISIONS OF NOTICE OF APPROVAL RECORDED DECEMBER 20, 2019
UNDER RECEPTION NO. 661357.
38.TERMS, CONDITIONS, PROVISIONS, BURDENS AND OBLIGATIONS AS SET FORTH IN RESOLUTION NO.
PZ-23-2019 RECORDED DECEMBER 30, 2019 UNDER RECEPTION NO. 661546 AND RE-RECORDED
JANUARY 8, 2020 UNDER RECEPTION NO. 661797.
39.TERMS, CONDITIONS, PROVISIONS, BURDENS AND OBLIGATIONS AS SET FORTH IN NOTICE OF
APPROVAL RECORDED JANUARY 14, 2021 UNDER RECEPTION NO. 672609 AND RECORDED JUNE 30,
2021 UNDER RECEPTION NO. 678177.
40.TERMS, CONDITIONS, PROVISIONS, BURDENS AND OBLIGATIONS AS SET FORTH IN NOTICE OF
APPROVAL RECORDED JANUARY 24, 2023 UNDER RECEPTION NO. 692772.
ALTA COMMITMENT
Old Republic National Title Insurance Company
Schedule B, Part II
(Exceptions)
Order Number: Q62014635-3
88
Land Title Guarantee Company
Disclosure Statements
Note: Pursuant to CRS 10-11-122, notice is hereby given that:
Note: Effective September 1, 1997, CRS 30-10-406 requires that all documents received for recording or filing in the
clerk and recorder's office shall contain a top margin of at least one inch and a left, right and bottom margin of at least
one half of an inch. The clerk and recorder may refuse to record or file any document that does not conform, except that,
the requirement for the top margin shall not apply to documents using forms on which space is provided for recording or
filing information at the top margin of the document.
Note: Colorado Division of Insurance Regulations 8-1-2 requires that "Every title entity shall be responsible for all matters
which appear of record prior to the time of recording whenever the title entity conducts the closing and is responsible for
recording or filing of legal documents resulting from the transaction which was closed". Provided that Land Title
Guarantee Company conducts the closing of the insured transaction and is responsible for recording the legal documents
from the transaction, exception number 5 will not appear on the Owner's Title Policy and the Lenders Policy when issued.
Note: Affirmative mechanic's lien protection for the Owner may be available (typically by deletion of Exception no. 4 of
Schedule B, Section 2 of the Commitment from the Owner's Policy to be issued) upon compliance with the following
conditions:
No coverage will be given under any circumstances for labor or material for which the insured has contracted for or
agreed to pay.
Note: Pursuant to CRS 10-11-123, notice is hereby given:
The Subject real property may be located in a special taxing district.(A)
A certificate of taxes due listing each taxing jurisdiction will be obtained from the county treasurer of the county in
which the real property is located or that county treasurer's authorized agent unless the proposed insured provides
written instructions to the contrary. (for an Owner's Policy of Title Insurance pertaining to a sale of residential real
property).
(B)
The information regarding special districts and the boundaries of such districts may be obtained from the Board of
County Commissioners, the County Clerk and Recorder, or the County Assessor.
(C)
The land described in Schedule A of this commitment must be a single family residence which includes a
condominium or townhouse unit.
(A)
No labor or materials have been furnished by mechanics or material-men for purposes of construction on the land
described in Schedule A of this Commitment within the past 6 months.
(B)
The Company must receive an appropriate affidavit indemnifying the Company against un-filed mechanic's and
material-men's liens.
(C)
The Company must receive payment of the appropriate premium.(D)
If there has been construction, improvements or major repairs undertaken on the property to be purchased within
six months prior to the Date of Commitment, the requirements to obtain coverage for unrecorded liens will include:
disclosure of certain construction information; financial information as to the seller, the builder and or the contractor;
payment of the appropriate premium fully executed Indemnity Agreements satisfactory to the company, and, any
additional requirements as may be necessary after an examination of the aforesaid information by the Company.
(E)
89
This notice applies to owner's policy commitments disclosing that a mineral estate has been severed from the surface
estate, in Schedule B-2.
Note: Pursuant to CRS 10-1-128(6)(a), It is unlawful to knowingly provide false, incomplete, or misleading facts or
information to an insurance company for the purpose of defrauding or attempting to defraud the company. Penalties may
include imprisonment, fines, denial of insurance, and civil damages. Any insurance company or agent of an insurance
company who knowingly provides false, incomplete, or misleading facts or information to a policyholder or claimant for
the purpose of defrauding or attempting to defraud the policyholder or claimant with regard to a settlement or award
payable from insurance proceeds shall be reported to the Colorado Division of Insurance within the Department of
Regulatory Agencies.
Note: Pursuant to Colorado Division of Insurance Regulations 8-1-3, notice is hereby given of the availability of a closing
protection letter for the lender, purchaser, lessee or seller in connection with this transaction.
Note: Pursuant to CRS 24-21-514.5, Colorado notaries may remotely notarize real estate deeds and other documents
using real-time audio-video communication technology. You may choose not to use remote notarization for any
document.
That there is recorded evidence that a mineral estate has been severed, leased, or otherwise conveyed from the
surface estate and that there is substantial likelihood that a third party holds some or all interest in oil, gas, other
minerals, or geothermal energy in the property; and
(A)
That such mineral estate may include the right to enter and use the property without the surface owner's
permission.
(B)
90
Joint Notice of Privacy Policy of
Land Title Guarantee Company
Land Title Insurance Corporation and
Old Republic National Title Insurancy Company
This Statement is provided to you as a customer of Land Title Guarantee Company as agent for Land Title Insurance
Corporation and Old Republic National Title Insurance Company.
We want you to know that we recognize and respect your privacy expectations and the requirements of federal and state
privacy laws. Information security is one of our highest priorities. We recognize that maintaining your trust and confidence
is the bedrock of our business. We maintain and regularly review internal and external safeguards against unauthorized
access to your non-public personal information ("Personal Information").
In the course of our business, we may collect Personal Information about you from:
applications or other forms we receive from you, including communications sent through TMX, our web-based
transaction management system;
your transactions with, or from the services being performed by us, our affiliates, or others;
a consumer reporting agency, if such information is provided to us in connection with your transaction;
and
The public records maintained by governmental entities that we obtain either directly from those entities, or from
our affiliates and non-affiliates.
Our policies regarding the protection of the confidentiality and security of your Personal Information are as follows:
We restrict access to all Personal Information about you to those employees who need to know that information in
order to provide products and services to you.
We may share your Personal Information with affiliated contractors or service providers who provide services in the
course of our business, but only to the extent necessary for these providers to perform their services and to
provide these services to you as may be required by your transaction.
We maintain physical, electronic and procedural safeguards that comply with federal standards to protect your
Personal Information from unauthorized access or intrusion.
Employees who violate our strict policies and procedures regarding privacy are subject to disciplinary action.
We regularly assess security standards and procedures to protect against unauthorized access to Personal
Information.
WE DO NOT DISCLOSE ANY PERSONAL INFORMATION ABOUT YOU WITH ANYONE FOR ANY PURPOSE THAT
IS NOT STATED ABOVE OR PERMITTED BY LAW.
Consistent with applicable privacy laws, there are some situations in which Personal Information may be disclosed. We
may disclose your Personal Information when you direct or give us permission; when we are required by law to do so, for
example, if we are served a subpoena; or when we suspect fraudulent or criminal activities. We also may disclose your
Personal Information when otherwise permitted by applicable privacy laws such as, for example, when disclosure is
needed to enforce our rights arising out of any agreement, transaction or relationship with you.
Our policy regarding dispute resolution is as follows: Any controversy or claim arising out of or relating to our privacy
policy, or the breach thereof, shall be settled by arbitration in accordance with the rules of the American Arbitration
91
Association, and judgment upon the award rendered by the arbitrator(s) may be entered in any court having jurisdiction
thereof.
92
Commitment For Title Insurance
Issued by Old Republic National Title Insurance Company
NOTICE
IMPORTANT—READ CAREFULLY: THIS COMMITMENT IS AN OFFER TO ISSUE ONE OR MORE TITLE INSURANCE
POLICIES. ALL CLAIMS OR REMEDIES SOUGHT AGAINST THE COMPANY INVOLVING THE CONTENT OF THIS
COMMITMENT OR THE POLICY MUST BE BASED SOLELY IN CONTRACT.
THIS COMMITMENT IS NOT AN ABSTRACT OF TITLE, REPORT OF THE CONDITION OF TITLE, LEGAL OPINION, OPINION
OF TITLE, OR OTHER REPRESENTATION OF THE STATUS OF TITLE. THE PROCEDURES USED BY THE COMPANY TO DETERMINE INSURABILITY OF
THE TITLE, INCLUDING ANY SEARCH AND EXAMINATION, ARE PROPRIETARY TO THE COMPANY, WERE PERFORMED SOLELY FOR THE BENEFIT OF
THE COMPANY, AND CREATE NO EXTRACONTRACTUAL LIABILITY TO ANY PERSON, INCLUDING A PROPOSED INSURED.
THE COMPANY’S OBLIGATION UNDER THIS COMMITMENT IS TO ISSUE A POLICY TO A PROPOSED INSURED IDENTIFIED IN SCHEDULE A IN
ACCORDANCE WITH THE TERMS AND PROVISIONS OF THIS COMMITMENT. THE COMPANY HAS NO LIABILITY OR OBLIGATION INVOLVING THE
CONTENT OF THIS COMMITMENT TO ANY OTHER PERSON. .
COMMITMENT TO ISSUE POLICY
Subject to the Notice; Schedule B, Part I—Requirements; Schedule B, Part II—Exceptions; and the Commitment Conditions, Old Republic National Title Insurance
Company, a Minnesota corporation (the “Company”), commits to issue the Policy according to the terms and provisions of this Commitment. This Commitment is
effective as of the Commitment Date shown in Schedule A for each Policy described in Schedule A, only when the Company has entered in Schedule A both the
specified dollar amount as the Proposed Policy Amount and the name of the Proposed Insured. If all of the Schedule B, Part I—Requirements have not been met
within 6 months after the Commitment Date, this Commitment terminates and the Company’s liability and obligation end.
COMMITMENT CONDITIONS
1. DEFINITIONS
2. If all of the Schedule B, Part I—Requirements have not been met within the time period specified in the Commitment to Issue Policy, Commitment terminates
and the Company’s liability and obligation end.
3. The Company’s liability and obligation is limited by and this Commitment is not valid without:
4. COMPANY’S RIGHT TO AMEND
The Company may amend this Commitment at any time. If the Company amends this Commitment to add a defect, lien, encumbrance, adverse claim, or
other matter recorded in the Public Records prior to the Commitment Date, any liability of the Company is limited by Commitment Condition 5. The
Company shall not be liable for any other amendment to this Commitment.
5. LIMITATIONS OF LIABILITY
i. comply with the Schedule B, Part I—Requirements;
ii. eliminate, with the Company’s written consent, any Schedule B, Part II—Exceptions; or
iii. acquire the Title or create the Mortgage covered by this Commitment.
6. LIABILITY OF THE COMPANY MUST BE BASED ON THIS COMMITMENT
“Knowledge” or “Known”: Actual or imputed knowledge, but not constructive notice imparted by the Public Records.(a)
“Land”: The land described in Schedule A and affixed improvements that by law constitute real property. The term “Land” does not include any
property beyond the lines of the area described in Schedule A, nor any right, title, interest, estate, or easement in abutting streets, roads, avenues,
alleys, lanes, ways, or waterways, but this does not modify or limit the extent that a right of access to and from the Land is to be insured by the Policy.
(b)
“Mortgage”: A mortgage, deed of trust, or other security instrument, including one evidenced by electronic means authorized by law.(c)
“Policy”: Each contract of title insurance, in a form adopted by the American Land Title Association, issued or to be issued by the Company
pursuant to this Commitment.
(d)
“Proposed Insured”: Each person identified in Schedule A as the Proposed Insured of each Policy to be issued pursuant to this Commitment.(e)
“Proposed Policy Amount”: Each dollar amount specified in Schedule A as the Proposed Policy Amount of each Policy to be issued pursuant to this
Commitment.
(f)
“Public Records”: Records established under state statutes at the Commitment Date for the purpose of imparting constructive notice of matters
relating to real property to purchasers for value and without Knowledge.
(g)
“Title”: The estate or interest described in Schedule A.(h)
the Notice;(a)
the Commitment to Issue Policy;(b)
the Commitment Conditions;(c)
Schedule A;(d)
Schedule B, Part I—Requirements; and(e)
Schedule B, Part II—Exceptions; and(f)
a counter-signature by the Company or its issuing agent that may be in electronic form.(g)
The Company’s liability under Commitment Condition 4 is limited to the Proposed Insured’s actual expense incurred in the interval between the
Company’s delivery to the Proposed Insured of the Commitment and the delivery of the amended Commitment, resulting from the Proposed
Insured’s good faith reliance to:
(a)
The Company shall not be liable under Commitment Condition 5(a) if the Proposed Insured requested the amendment or had Knowledge of the
matter and did not notify the Company about it in writing.
(b)
The Company will only have liability under Commitment Condition 4 if the Proposed Insured would not have incurred the expense had the
Commitment included the added matter when the Commitment was first delivered to the Proposed Insured.
(c)
The Company’s liability shall not exceed the lesser of the Proposed Insured’s actual expense incurred in good faith and described in Commitment
Conditions 5(a)(i) through 5(a)(iii) or the Proposed Policy Amount.
(d)
The Company shall not be liable for the content of the Transaction Identification Data, if any.(e)
In no event shall the Company be obligated to issue the Policy referred to in this Commitment unless all of the Schedule B, Part I—Requirements
have been met to the satisfaction of the Company.
(f)
In any event, the Company’s liability is limited by the terms and provisions of the Policy.(g)
Only a Proposed Insured identified in Schedule A, and no other person, may make a claim under this Commitment.(a)
Any claim must be based in contract and must be restricted solely to the terms and provisions of this Commitment.(b)
Until the Policy is issued, this Commitment, as last revised, is the exclusive and entire agreement between the parties with respect to the subject
matter of this Commitment and supersedes all prior commitment negotiations, representations, and proposals of any kind, whether written or oral,
express or implied, relating to the subject matter of this Commitment.
(c)
93
7. IF THIS COMMITMENT HAS BEEN ISSUED BY AN ISSUING AGENT
The issuing agent is the Company’s agent only for the limited purpose of issuing title insurance commitments and policies. The issuing agent is not the
Company’s agent for the purpose of providing closing or settlement services.
8. PRO-FORMA POLICY
The Company may provide, at the request of a Proposed Insured, a pro-forma policy illustrating the coverage that the Company may provide. A pro-forma
policy neither reflects the status of Title at the time that the pro-forma policy is delivered to a Proposed Insured, nor is it a commitment to insure.
9. ARBITRATION
The Policy contains an arbitration clause. All arbitrable matters when the Proposed Policy Amount is $2,000,000 or less shall be arbitrated at the option of
either the Company or the Proposed Insured as the exclusive remedy of the parties. A Proposed Insured may review a copy of the arbitration rules at
http://www.alta.org/arbitration.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, Land Title Insurance Corporation has caused its corporate name and seal to be affixed by its duly authorized officers on the date shown
in Schedule A to be valid when countersigned by a validating officer or other authorized signatory.
Issued by:
Land Title Guarantee Company
3033 East First Avenue Suite 600
Denver, Colorado 80206
303-321-1880
Craig B. Rants, Senior Vice President
This page is only a part of a 2016 ALTA® Commitment for Title Insurance issued by Old Republic National Title Insurance Company. This Commitment is not
valid without the Notice; the Commitment to Issue Policy; the Commitment Conditions; Schedule A; Schedule B, Part I—Requirements; and Schedule B, Part II
—Exceptions; and a counter-signature by the Company or its issuing agent that may be in electronic form.
Copyright 2006-2016 American Land Title Association. All rights reserved.
The use of this Form (or any derivative thereof) is restricted to ALTA licensees and ALTA members in good standing as of the date of use. All other uses are
prohibited. Reprinted under license from the American Land Title Association.
The deletion or modification of any Schedule B, Part II—Exception does not constitute an agreement or obligation to provide coverage beyond the
terms and provisions of this Commitment or the Policy.
(d)
Any amendment or endorsement to this Commitment must be in writing and authenticated by a person authorized by the Company.(e)
When the Policy is issued, all liability and obligation under this Commitment will end and the Company’s only liability will be under the Policy.(f)
94
CITY OF ASPEN PRE-APPLICATION CONFERENCE SUMMARY
PRE-23-042
DATE: 03/21/2023
PLANNER: Haley Hart, Long-Range Planner, haley.hart@aspen.gov
PROJECT: Maroon Creek Club, Expansion of Clubhouse Building and Addition of Commercial Floor Area
REPRESENTATIVE: Chris Bendon, chris@bendonadams.com
DESCRIPTION: The Maroon Creek Club’s Grand Champions Club (Clubhouse) is located on Lot 51 of the Maroon Creek
Club Subdivision. The Maroon Creek Club was adopted into Pitkin County under Resolution No. 93-104, and later
annexed into the City under Ordinances No. 33 and 34, Series of 1996. The Subdivision Improvements Agreement (SIA),
recorded in 1993 under reception no. 363236, has remained the guiding document for floor area allowance, mitigation,
vested rights, and other applicable information for the PUD after the property was annexed into the City.
The potential applicant is proposing the addition of approximately 4,818 square feet to the Clubhouse. Currently, the
applicant proposes to increase the size of the gym by 2,066 square feet, to build three new internal tennis court viewing
platforms at 204 square feet per platform (612 square feet total), and to create three conditioned spaces at the patio
area for dining purposes for a total of 2,140 additional square feet. The floor area for Lot 51 is set forth in the SIA and
states there is an allowed 30,100 square feet of commercial development, of which, 8,000 square feet is allocated
towards cart storage, and 1,200 is allocated towards a snack bar. The remaining 20,900 square feet is allocated towards
the Clubhouse.
In 1994, a memo to Suzanne Konchan, County Planning Director, indicated that there was approval for the following
allocation of the 1,200 square feet granted towards the snack bar. This allocation included 700 square feet for a halfway
house, 300 square feet for a comfort station, and 200 square feet for a ball shack. Subsequently, an unrecorded
Insubstantial PD Amendment dated June 28, 2000, stated that only 312 square feet was used for the snack bar, and the
remaining 888 square feet of the total 1,200 square feet was allowed to move back towards commercial floor area for
the Clubhouse, with 100 square feet of that being dedicated towards a seasonal food tent. Thus, the remaining 788
square feet has been conceptualized by the potential applicant to be part of the allowable commercial floor area. Staff
is unable to confirm the addition of the 788 square feet towards commercial net leasable floor area currently or that
the 100 square feet was available for the seasonal tent. The applicant shall submit a full summary of floor area for Lot
51, and the allocation of the 31,100 square feet granted under BOCC Resolution No. 93-104. Staff will evaluate the
vested floor area, the current floor area as built, the availability of any remaining allowable floor area, and the proposed
additions. Additionally, staff will evaluate how the proposed additions would impact the overall calculation of
commercial net leasable area upon receiving a completed application.
The applicant proposes to increase commercial net leasable space, therefore GMQS must be considered. Per Resolution
No. 91-111, the applicant has only mitigated for 26,100 total square feet of commercial net leasable space at this time.
The applicant shall include in the application, a background summary on GMQS.
The Maroon Creek Club has enjoyed many improvements over the past five years all detailed as Insubstantial
Amendments. These improvements include, but are not limited to exterior siding, roofing and fenestration changes,
addition of a second front door, interior remodels to the pro shop and bar space, front entry pedestrian and auto court
reconfiguration, expanded pedestrian walkway, pool remodel, landscaping upgrades, and changes to fenestration to
the pool bar. Due to the multitude of upgrades to the Clubhouse and Lot 51 over the past years, and the potential
applicant’s current proposal to increase floor area and expand the Clubhouse footprint, this proposal may be subject to
Exhibit C7
95
a more scrutinized review. The proposed additions were not conceptualized with the project’s original approval yet are
generally consistent with the original design and concept. As such, based on the proposed scope, staff’s understanding
of the vested approvals and existing development, staff believes that this would be reviewed as a Minor Amendment
to a Planned Development Detailed Review Approval. This review is a one-step review with the Planning and Zoning
Commission. Understanding that the scope may change or that additional information on the relationship of existing
development to vested approvals may raise questions that are more appropriate for an amendment to Project Review,
staff reserves the right to re-evaluate the review path based on the application.
For your convenience – links to the Land Use Code and Land Use Application are below:
Land Use Code Land Use Application
RELEVANT LAND USE CODE SECTIONS:
Section Number Section Title
26.304 Common Development Review Procedures
26.412 Commercial Design Review
26.445.110 Planned Development - Amendments
26.470 Growth Management Quota System (GMQS)
26.490.040.D Approval Documents - Approved Plan Set
26.575.020 Calculations and Measurements
REVIEW BY:
• Community Development Staff for complete application and recommendation
• Planning and Zoning Commission for determination
PUBLIC HEARING: Yes
PLANNING FEES: $4,550.00 Deposit for up to 14 billable hours. Lesser/additional hours will be refunded or
billed at a rate of $325 per hour
REFERRAL FEES: Engineering Department - $325 deposit for one hour of review, additional hours of review
will be billed at $325/hour.
City Parks Department, Flat Fee - $975.00 (Will likely be necessary depending on site plan
implications of the proposed scope. Will be confirmed at Completeness Review.)
TOTAL DEPOSIT: $5,850.00
APPLICATION CHECKLIST – Please email the following application materials to CDEHadmins@aspen.gov as a single
PDF:
Completed Land Use Application and signed fee agreement.
Pre-application Conference Summary (this document).
Street address and legal description of the parcel on which development is proposed to occur, consisting of
a current (no older than 6 months) certificate from a title insurance company, an ownership and
encumbrance report, or attorney licensed to practice in the State of Colorado, listing the names of all
owners of the property, and all mortgages, judgments, liens, easements, contracts and agreements
affecting the parcel, and demonstrating the owner’s right to apply for the Development Application.
Applicant’s name, address and telephone number in a letter signed by the applicant that states the name,
address and telephone number of the representative authorized to act on behalf of the applicant.
HOA Compliance Form
An 8 1/2” by 11” vicinity map locating the parcel within the City of Aspen.
96
A draft plat of the parcel certified by a registered land surveyor by licensed in the State of Colorado. Plat
must clearly depict the extents of the existing and proposed building envelope, areas to be relocated, and
existing and proposed building envelope area totals.
A site improvement survey (no older than a year from submittal) including topography and vegetation
showing the current status of the parcel certified by a registered land surveyor by licensed in the State of
Colorado.
A written description of the proposal and an explanation in written, graphic, or model form of how the
proposed development complies with the review standards relevant to the development application and
relevant land use approvals associated with the property.
Floor plans that identify and provide calculations for existing and proposed Floor Area and Net Leasable.
Elevations (and renderings, if possible) that allow for the evaluation of Commercial Design review criteria
Proposed Site Plans for areas impacted by the proposed changes.
Written responses to all review criteria.
If the copy is deemed complete by the Planning Director, the following will then need to be submitted:
Total deposit for review of the application.
Disclaimer:
The foregoing summary is advisory in nature only and is not binding on the City. The summary is based on current
zoning, which is subject to change in the future, and upon factual representations that may or may not be accurate.
The summary does not create a legal or vested rights.
97
Maroon Creek Club – Vicinity Map
Exhibit C8
98
Exhibit D1
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
109
110
111
112
113
114
115
116
117
118
119
120
121
122
123
124
125
126
127
128
129
130
131
132
I lfll lll\111111111111111 111111111111 1117 14 il2P' OIIDINANc:a .II DI.II NI.II P'lllClN COUNTY CLEIIIC
ORDINANCE NO. 40
(SERIES OF1996)
AN ORDINANCE OF THE ASPEN CITY COUNCIL GRANTING A
REZONING FOR THE MAROON CREEK SUBDMSION IN
CONJUNcnON wrm ANNEXATION INTO THE CITY OF ASPEN
WHEREAS, pursuant to Section 26.92.020 of the Aspen Municipal Code
the applicant, the City of Aspen, has submitted a request for a map amendment
to rezone the Maroon Creek Oub subdivision, two Pfister parcels, and the water
tank parcel in conjunction with annexation into the Gty of Aspen; and
WHEREAS, through the development approvals of the Maroon Creek
Oub subdivision the developer agreed to annex into the City of Aspen;
WHEREAS, it is the obligation of the City of Aspen, under the Water
Service Agreement, lo not divest or diminish the land use approvals or
development rights awarded by Pitkin County for the project in their entirety
and has therefore maintained ail existing County approvals, findings, written
interpretations and amendments for the subdivision granted prior to the
annexation agreement; and
WHEREAS, to further clarify the approvals and the intent of the Water
Service Agreement and the Annexation Agreement, Exlu'bit A defines the
following definitions of the Pitkin County Land Use Code that shall be utilized
for purposes of determining height, bulk, and setbacks within the PUD:
Accessory Structures
Basement
Building Height
Floor Area (FAR)
Setback
Structure
Yard
Yard, front, side and rear
WHEREAS, a duly noticed public hearing was held by the Aspen
Planning and Zoning Commission on October 22, 1996 to consider the
application for a map amendment and forwarded a unanimous recommendation
of approval to the Aspen City Council; and
WHEREAS, the Aspen City Council having considered the Commission's
recommendation for a map amendment at a public hearing on November 25,
···----�--�--------····--·
www pdffactory.c
Exhibit A2
133
134
135
136
137
138
139
140
141
142
143
144
145
146
Exhibit D3
147
148
149
150
151
152
153
154
155
156
157
158
159
Y•:' . . . .
v cr+.r i
g
1 °' < 4. .r L :`},
yr ra .. +
4
i'1-
y f. 2 rx jM ,+ i'L. 3,c ti fk. ,v0. r 1 .:y;t},
I
vJ .!` ' RR"', xr ry", f} ..,{5{ #^Y.: }
y ,. a
r.F x '•''trj",+Y".-h ".'y-
Y
y 6
yv j.-.' 1 9.-:
I. 5
t •J f . -:a1+.6 F..,' -K: a r.
5:
RE80LIITION OF THE 80ARD OF COIINTY COMMISSIONER6
ii-
PITRIN COIINTY COLORADO, AWARDING COMMERCIAL GROATH I.,•"'
i MANAGEMENT QIIOTA SYSTEM ALLOCATIONS FOR THE 1991 COMPETITION
z
AS FORWARDED BY TH& PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION
4..
y Resolution No. 92- FG,:'
irr
K` WBEREAB, the Maroon Creek Development Corporation submitted
a commercial Growth Management Quota System (GMQS) application for
y
14 EGU s for the Pfister Ranch/GOlf property which is described i
i
within Exhibit "A"; and
IWHEREAS, on November 5, 1991, the Pitkin County Planning and
i .
i
1 Zoning Commission (hereinafter "COmmission"), held a duly noticed
public hearing pursuant to Section 5-510.6(a) (3) of the Pitkin
County Land Use Code, in order to review growth management j• .
r
applications; and
WHEREAS, the Board of County Commissioners (hereinafter 1
Board") understands that the Planning and Zoning Commission
reviewed only one application for the 1991 Commercial GMQS i
i:
competition and scores the project 50 points; and
I` WAEREAB, the Board recognized that there are 43 EGU's
available for allotment and the sole application scored above
i
minimum threshold.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of County
Commissioners awards the Pfister Ranch/Golf project 14 EGU's for
i
the 1991 commercial GMQS competition.
r ,.
APPROVED by the Board at its regular meetinq on January 14, p;, .'Y<
1992. i'1•
7
F k..
t,
a,Y i'Yt":.
i
r
i'M
f/ ,
ruusuv
t' F - i . r.,.. -.
2 (-.
e;` sS4y,:
A a t . r
1? r
ti
rR' i_5'a
j
J - . •
r'`c
7
ij
1.,
Exhibit D4
160
i'
ir „v j, -r c.' f t ye t 'K n t; 'G.1cJt .sr r 1!3A.'
q ti - fi'tt. " 1` Epl
y `! r Y.i i.--..,. , 'sr i ay wt .,+'i{h iaS y 7.fa t 'd'f a. . Uw yf .
rt,"rr S ry f".,
j' . :. d'
u ,s,f ,
j.
cc
tt v
r ,'?
fs..
TF "
A' 7i ' 3
v2;; ,c
7i"tw=. _...
sx,,
i `/
s
Resolution No. 92—t7
y Page 2
i K a_ .
80ARD OF COIINTY COMMISSIONERS
OF,PITKIN COIINTY COLORADO
i, t
i.x vf°," L':
r a...:
g Gw..-.P-a r-- '"^^ Y
4;
JAMES R xUE Chairman
D E
1 r ..
ATT:
7
S, . G V
a;
J@ @tt@ JOIIeS /
D uty County C rk
s.• c:,
APPROVED AS TO FORM: APPROVED AS TO CONTENTC
y.,h-'`_
r r
C
Tim Whitsitt,
8uza e Ronch n,
County Attorne Coua y Planning Director
M
COlf7nlisS/o£- Q,41!
reso.bocc.qmqs.com.forward ChaH+ner+Nay eEthridge o"g `'y"""`
commissioner Rass voUn9 .
Commissioner True votirg E
i
Commissioner Tuite votin9 i i '
Commissioner Crowley voting
5?
i
r= `
uv
K ,
w .
r' t'`,''
tc+`"
r .
t , .-'•.n . . .
y . . .
4 . . .. 41.''
y .: .
C{ . . . 4r°,
l
r f !q
r k
r, Xt ,^zA Y ' j
F
u "
i ,
I {I
Y , '''
Y i
1' f
K
i
i 2 t i.^
y
r i
y 3, . e 1
r
w r
i. I
f. - . ...I
4Y . l . - . ... 161
i i 3xr t '
s
i: ,. . v
i,
l a rr.'i s'°, t5 ':,
y" ,
a '
c yL ?
kr 9]d - /t! i a p s ci*. <
4f}r, y{
N `+ t'''4 "t '`4 i y
i fTi' .' '
F 'r r . J
a.,:.1:::_.._Y _. 'ai. J iv r h t _- r. ..._ .. , 3:: ji'.!tr
1.,,i l{c-
RESOLIITION NO. 91
6eries of 1991)
RESOLIITION OF THS BOARD OB COIINTY COMMZSSIODISRS OF PITICIN COIINTY,
COLORADO EBTENDING THS 1990 AFFORDABLE HOQSZNG (3IIIDELINEB A8
RECOMMENDED BY THE ABPfiN/PITRIN COIINTY HOIISING AIITHORITY BOARD.
r
WHEREAB, the Aspen/Pitkin County Housinq Authority Board is to
annnal).y deve2op and reaommend the Housing Income, Eligibility
Guidelines, and Housing Price Guidelines for approval by the Pitkin
County Board of Commissioners; and
WHEREAB, the 1990 Affordable Housing Guidelines were approved
by the Pitkin County Board of Commissioners with the adoption of
Resolution No. 175, at the regular meeting of August 4, 1990; and
WHER8A8, the Aspen/Pitkin County Aousing Authority Board voted
at the regular meeting of June 12, 1991 to extend the effectiveness
of the Guidelines until such time that the 1991 Affordable Housing 1'.
j Guidelines are adopted; and
WHEREAB, the Aspen/Pitkin County Housing Authority Board is
requesting approval of the Pitkin County Board of Commissioners to
formally extend the effectiveness of the Guidelines until such time
that new guidelines are adopted.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the 1990 Affordable
Housing Guidelines be and hereby are extended until such time that
the 1991 Affordable Housing Guidelines are adopted and approved by
the Pitkin Coui ty Board of Commissioners and the Aspen/Pitkin
County Housing Authority Board.
ZNTROAIICED AND APPROVSD by the Pi n County Board of Commissioners
at its regular meeting on the day of ,
1991.
F ATT BOARD OF CDUNTY COMMISSIONERS
r'
L s BY:
I`r
aneLte Jones; Deputy Wayne thridge, irman
ounty Clerk ;' Date:
i
MANAGER APPROVAL: APPROVED AS TO FORM:
d
Reid Haughey;Tim W its'tt,
j Pitkin County Manager Pitki Co nty Attorney
ey?`
6V L y, .
1
x s_k:,.. ,.,;: . . . r .._,
Yi ,
a . , _ . . . .
5
y?+!'!'f,'
f>!"t'?
d„,`',
r:''+"j^r
Exhibit D5
162
1
y.x
r' ? -,.L. ' 4 i
t' 1 l
r 7 a t :> u
1 1_ '{ a:
Y
RGM tldi _ Nh w,71 .
1
y 7 t 1 ,. ..
Y . 4 2y.l^1::K.7fM`ry' ' . . •
t.
336728 G9/3/91 15:^6 Rec .>i7 BF:, 657 F'G 306 y
Si2via bavis Pit::in Crtty C1erF::, Doc $.UO
RS80LUTION OF TS8 BOARD OF COU24TY CO!lMIBBIONERB
s
OF PITAIN COONTY COLORADO, GRANTZNG APPBOVAL
OF DETAILED SIIBMISSION FOR SIIBDIVIBION 1041 EINIRONMENTAL
HAZARD REYIEW SCENIC FOREGROIIND OVERI,AY REVIEW PLANNED UNIT
DEVELOPMENT REZONING SPECIAT, REVIEW APFROVAL FOR
RELOCATION OF THE RSNO RADIO TOWER, LOT LINE ADJIISTMENT
WITS THE ARD PROPERTY, G&NERAI. AND DETAILED BIIBMISSiON
TO THE "GRAND AMENDMSNT" PORTION OF THS APPLICATZON AND
AMENDMENT TO THE BIITTERMILR SRI AREA MASTER PLAN
FOR THE PFISTER RANCH/GOLF APPLZCATION
a" Resolution No. 91-
AfHERSAB, Maroon Creek Development Corp., hereinafter
Applicant", has applied to the Board of County Commissioners of
w Pitkin County, Colorado, hereinafter "Hoaxd" for approval of
Detailed Submission of 1041 Environmental Hazard Review, Scenic
t;1r j, Foreground Overlay Review, Subdivision, Planned Unit Development,
Rezoning, Special Review Approval for Relocation of the KSNO Radio
a:.;<k=.:„ Tower, General and Detailed Submission to the °Grand Amendment
rLz'•`;%.r-
r'"'=`` portion of the application and Amendment to the Buttermilk Ski Areay.5
s:=<`."-`1 Master Plan pursuant to the appropriate sections of the Land Usee.
y..:-
5
Code; and
1
1 WSEREAB, the total property (the "Project Site") is
3
u approximately 369 acres, including approximately 70 acres to be
i;'^° available under lease or easement to the AppZicant, zoned AF-2, AF-
i
2 (PUD) and AF-SKI. The Project Site is located north and west of
I
Maroon Creek on both sides of Iiighway 82, and includes portions of
Y; I
YK
q.Xi.
t .s+''-'
v
k' ' . . '
t;:'
xz.:.i
a rt x± '
ry'}.j...«, ' r.s 3:-' .
v .,'r,• .M1a''. t:
r',}
r:
r:•i
ti,u;:
Exhibit D6
163
q
ry{ s
vL,.,GL:}'.g1 X ._
1 'it };: .. a
4,
o
j,.•`!1..1( r1 C. .a. .1'..A - br 7 r d .:
4 ,:
a .n'vv $.F t 4 '
d :T K t
y
y y' 7 . {`
a L,cy
r kt ,t '_ .,: s.,` Y-a Y -
rk t ;}'.
N .} . .
s`` Y,
u ``m u . _
r . . iTm,.•"5 y -
336728 c g/,3/91 15:.?6 Rec .OG BY 657 PG 307SilviaDavis, FifNin Cn y Clerk, Aoc .U
Resolution No. 91-
Page 2
the Buttermilk Ski area (Tiehack), more specifically shown on
Exhibit "A", vicinity map attached; and
WSEREAS, the existing zoning and acreages are outlined in j{`
ESChibit "B", attached; and
WHEREAe, the Applicant has submitted the application described
above (the "Application") requesting approval for the following:
1. A residential and golf course development project (the
Proj eCt").
a) Additions to the existing Grand Champions Club,
s including an 18 hole championship golf course with
driving range, maintenance facilities, and clubhouse
additions;
b) The development of 43 Free-market single-family
units, including 5 on the south bench, 5 on the north
bench, and one (Lot 16) directly opposite the Tiehack Ski
Lift, and the development of 37 free-market townhomes.
The maximum square footage for the il homes on the north
S and south benches and Lot 16 shall be 10,000 square feet
i or each home. The maximum square footage for the homes
on Lots 6-12, 19-31, 40 and 46-48 shall be 6,000 square
y; feet. The maximum square footage for the homes on the
remaining lots (Lots 32 through 39) shall be 5,500 square
j feet. The townhouse units shall be, at the Applicant's
option, up to 148,000 square feet in total, with no
individual townhouse unit to exceed 4,800 square feet.
c) Applicant has successfully competed for allocation
under the County Residential Growth Management Quota
System (°GMQS j for the years 1988, 1989, an@ 1990 andYhasreceivedGMQSallocationsfar51freemarketunits
and as more fully set forth in this Resolution a GMQSn`•'= replacement credit for 24 (i.e., Park Meadows) additional
residential units.
A d) Applicant has received a 1988 commercial GMQS
approval for the golf course and 10,900 square feet of
commercial building and 6,000 square feet of GMQS
replacement credit (for the restaurant at Tiehackj .
i Further, as more fully set forth in this Resolution, the
s_:; Applicant has received a GMQS commercial replacement
h credit for 9,200 square feet (Aspen Country Inn). A
total of 30,100 square feet of commercial space is to be
added to the existing Club subject only to Applicant
x:S
x.
i ,.t
t^-mr'
y, . Tr.y y . v
i:5. d._..4r:.F:,
tyC
A.2,!.
f.^+3`•s`t i Y s h'. ' . .+5;;
b.. a•,i»:,,o: _
v
164
Cwn,'
M t
ru>.
1
E J >
r
1'
1Lt •~
s . u .
1v -tr'x.r. r wi . r,if ar k ,, r."L
yT F y . ,g
s ,yy„F r,'
ry 1' . . Ti
T
1 ':
1
7 . _}t.h..
fi :i .(y4"°y k f. F 't f ... r 7'°k'
rr I6'[ t.
e dna'i. , t v. a +' t
u-i!"'-t wir,.,.
s, y.S 4__y ri Y Y 1
l '
s.. . rT . . . . f.. . t' ,. ...SY-k"_..L.T,'1:.k-
Z6728 ]9/23/91 1:,:6 Ftec .+U Rf' 657 F'G 308
Silvia Davis, Pitki Cnty C1erF:, Doc .0:
Resolution No. 91-
Page 3
obtaining a GMQS alZotment for 4,000 additional square
feet and to the conditions' of approval outlined below.
Finally, as more fully set farth in this Resolution, r
Applicant has received a GMQS replacement credit for 12 f
Aspen Country Inn) lodge units. i';` '
j ej The permanent commitment of significant lands for
open space (a portion of which is in the form of a golf
course) and for preservation of the scenic foreground as
delineated in the application, in accordance with the
Pitkin County State Highway 82 Corridor Master Plan. It F
is the commitment of the applicant that the PUD sha11
never be further subdivided.
f) Intersection improvements to Highway 82 and the i .
relocated Stage Road and Tiehack Road to provide safer i: •
automobile circulation in the area.
g) Construction of a total of 40 affordable housing
units including 39 multi-family rental housing units and
1 single-family sale unit. The 39 multi-family units
shall be located together in the PMH zoned area on the
north side of Highway 82 as shown on the PUD detailed
submission plat. The proposal includes 13 one (1)
bedroom units, 13 two (2) bedrooms units, and 13 three
3) bedroom units all located in the northwest corner of
the Project Site; and on the south side of Highway 82 one
for sale" unit of 1,510 square feet, four (4) bedrooms
and 2-1/2 baths. The lot size shall be a minimum of
6,000 square feet. The unit shall be sold pursuant to
the Housing Authority quidelines at a Cateqory 1 sales
price based on 1,100 square feet. The "for sale" unit
y
is to satisfy the Housing Authority requirement to
mitigate the displacement caused by the demolition of the
Mathis unit. The Applicant shall have first choice to
rent any of the housing units to employees associated
with the Project as long as such employees qualify under
the County Housing Authority guidelines. Twelve {12) of
the two bedroom units within the multi-family complex are
to mitigate the displacement of the employees now livinq
in the Park Meadows.
h) The Buttermilk Master Plan shall be amended to allow
modification approved under this resolution including
improvement of ski facilities to include a relocated Ego
1 Hill lift, relocated parking to include no less than 121
parking spaces and eliminate the restaurant at the base
of Tiehack. No further amendments to the Buttermilk
Master Plan sha12 be allowed until such time ski lift
1 capacity is addressed.
Y yv7
4..r;1
y- f '.., :: . .--...
k S'7 .: .t
Mx:'
rc.
a X` '
i'°.,:;.
t's%:i
w
ti,
w
165
S TK i ,
1'r',1-a._S S ?; +'. ..., :,
r ..
t`
i.i' ,L ;..•
a ` y: -* y a .T t 7 i.•.n'(+;.
p !`q, .
It '
i'! ( °:
y'/
i3 ::i '«t, .:.
f ',i ' s''l'rp .
9[''` ••+,
14 9. 1". :
jr{
MyX fw,a f
s i )
F
f r'":. .?l aat'+ '"6'3D'fi.'`:.4'... +. ra...n r..- _ J`
i.ti:'.
336;28 09/3/91 1::^b Rec $.OU bk 657 FG 3d9
Silvia Davis, Pitkin Cnty Clerk., Doc ,GO
Resolution No. 91-
Page 4
i) Infrastructure improvements for all of the above
components of the Project, as delineated in the
Application. r !'
2. Rezoning of approximately 60.5 acres owned by the
Applicant from AF-1, AF-2 (PUD) and AF-SKI, to AR-2,R-15 and R- r,•
30. The remaining approximately 308.5 acres of land shall retain
existing zoning, except 10. 5 acres to be zoned Tourist, "T", and
5 acres to be zoned Permanent Moderate Housing, °PMH", and of such
remaining lands, approximately 172.5 acres shall be used as a golf
course (see Exhibit "D" PUD Plans, Sheet 1 of 55) .
3. Detailed Submission and PUD approval for the entire
Project subject only to obtaining a GMQS allocation for the 5 j 's'•
remaining residential units and 4,000 square feet of commercial
space not previously granted GMQS allocation; and
4. Setbacks and lot width variations for multi- and single-
family free market and PMH structures in accordance with the Bulk
and Area Chart dated June 13, 1991 attached hereto as Exfiibit "C".
5. Attached hereto as Exhibit "D" and made a part of the
application is the Detailed Submission PUD Plan consisting of 55 i
sheets dated September 27, 1990, revised July 26, 1991, August 30,
y 1991.
AHEREAB, the Planning and Zoning Commission reviewed the
Application at its regularly scheduled meetings and special
meetings and recommended denial to the Board of County
Commissioners. The Planning and Zoning Commission did, however, .
forward suggested conditions if the Board felt the project i
warranted an approval; and
i
WHEREAB, after review by the Planning and Zoning Commission,
the Board reviewed this Application at duly noticed public hearings
i•.;
on April 8, May 15, and June 11, 1991, at which times evidence and i" -E
testimony were presented with respect to this Application and f , -
S'i .,
havin a roved at that timegpp procedurally the review of the "Grand
j,
Amendment", General and Detailed Submission as part of this review
process; and
i:.
iF'
1T a ,t'_.. ..
H::'i:
t. J r
Sy '.". Y x
i y.
t
s° ti:,
Ry(166
1-sY' .,
C`
1 . yj/ . V
r. C t i
d l
1< q"1 rt+..Y' ..
ff 1 EL' :: ` i i.aj,. r _
a' f
1
li,` ii.`'e'
yk%?.f.- "f- «:+. :nr z°:f.` r h'.
w
1 .
y r. .. , j if£"
r: fY.o s„_a`Sx.`.. .s'a n,. .:._,r,¢"" ai1'`}ya:,yj.54y
3367 8 p9/3/91 15:26 Rec ,r p F; 657 F'6 310
Silvia Davis, Pitkin Cnty C2er-k, Doc .OU
s
Resolution No. 91-
Page 5
NHEAEAB, the Applicant shall receive the same score in GMQS
competition in future years For benefits and amenities and other
1i matters as it scored in the 1988, 1989 and 1990 applications; and
WHSREAB, the Applicant has previously received GMQS allotments
t
as £ollows:
r. Residential:
1988 - 24 Units
1989 - 17 Units
n•
Y,
1989 - 24 Units (Park Meadows Exemption)
199D - 10 Units
y-y x
i"Y For a total of 75 Total GMQS allocations to date
yp
ommercial•
d
t.: 1988 - 7,500 ± yard golf course
2, 9'00 square foot clubhouse and starter area
a;::,_.c. 8,000 square foot maintenance and golf storage area
6,000 square foot commercial restaurant, bar,
retail (Romeo's exemption)
1990 - 9.20o square foot clubhouse expansion (Aspen
Country Inn exemption)
26,100 Total square feet GMQS allocation to date
odge Rooms:
l -X,'`
r°`' 1990 - 12 lodge rooms (Aspen Country Inn exemption) not
to exceed 580 square feet each for a total of
6,960 square feet i
i
14:^, HOR, THERSFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Board that it does
s
hereby grant approval of the Application for Detailed Submission4;
for Subdivision, 1041 Environmental Hazard Review, Scenic
Foreground Overlay Review, Planned Unit Development, Rezoning,
L._,,,
t"'-` Special Review approval for Relocation of the KSNO Radio Tower, Lot
w_
f•=r ' r<.;,,; Line Adjustment witlx the Alcohol Rehabilitation Unit property
in
ri
y i;.,i
r
i:J:.:,,
c- 't'"u .y
yr '
i
i.
t
t'
t t
i
x.
Y
y.,„;:_•.
167
1
p'S"
z ts i 4?k, r+rx i r fa
t i t Y { .i t -x. so y '. o y,, F,.
1 .7l _` 3 fii ES'(.4'2 4'' . :...
H A .
V- . r
ti,
r f .i
tr
L
i
r +,c
n y
S!,
1.y _ _ -r,
S 4' ,. _ tA` M .. _ 1 . . ."...
t-,t`'6.;..T..a K'.w7'l t i;:4i'y_... :''....R7 . d .:1 '! .<,"qA
p >•.,Y s:,k'.
336;2B J9/23/91 15:26 F,ec .06 BY, 657 FG 311
Silvia Davisa Fitkin Cnty Clerk, Doc .GO
Resolution No. 91-
Page 6
i.e., subdivision exemption approval pursuant to Section 4-
2.2(a)(2) for the lot line adjustraent); and General and Detailed
Submission with respect to the "Grand Amendment" portion of the r .
i
5.._.-,
Application and amendment to the Buttermilk Ski Area Master Plan,
I together with all variations and other requests for land use
i
approvals requested for the Application subject to the following
conditions:
f
a I, eneraY Conditions of Approval:
1. GMQS exemptions for replacement credit for the demolition
of the Aspen County Inn, Obermeyer and Aspen Country
single-family unit shall be granted as follows:
the 2 single family homes (obermeyer and Aspen
Country Inn single-family home) may be replaced
on site, each on one of the newly subdivided
1 lots at their currently existing square
footage;
approximately 9,20o square feet of commercial
space from the Aspen Country Inn may be used
as replacement commercial square footage
proposed by the Applicant. No change in use
of the commercial square footage as proposed
L in the application shall be allowed without an
amendment to the PUD;
12 replacement lodge units may be transferred
from the Aspen Country Inn to the Grand
Champions Club. Each room shall not exceed
580 square feet for a total of 6,960 square
feet.
Any additional development approved as a result of this
review shall be required to receive GMQS allocations
i.e., the Applicant is required to obtain a GMQS
3 allocation for 5 of the single family homes and 4,000
c A square feet of cotnmercial space).
2. Density: The overall residential density shall be 80
free market units (43 single-family, 37 townhomes), and
39 employee PMEI rental units plus one single-family PMH
j employee sale unit.
j
n.
s¢;:', C' .
M .
11 i
7
13_
f; 4'
y.
m
r..
y:y 168
s, 57 i S fnu a d....
i '
F t, -.:; i ".t' ,' d .: '
t n„t:i °
r ,. '.
N > : rs aqy¢ + .__.•
t ,st 1..:
hr~
VH I:I h
t
ik..T. .. 16h.. . i.k Myx1-4._ .. .h .'. . f'fC.
kJ,
y+,n t
r:.
u OS.
r'1":s 1iJ.:•'t 11',..3 6 r^8 r q/2/91 SJ:GEI Rec . HK. 657 FG 312
t"j"
Silvia Davis, F•itkin Cnty Clerk, Doc .Ou
Resolution No. 91—
Page 7
3. The Tiehack parking area sha21 have a minimum of 122
spaces and shall be open to the public for day-time use
only. Additional modifications to the Buttermilk Master
Plan as shown on the detailed submission plat are
approved. No additional revisions to the Buttermilk r
Master Plan shall be allowed by the County without
adequate review of lift capacity and the transit and
parking needs of Suttermilk Mountain as a whoie.
4. The single-family home locations shall be rezoned to R-
15 and R-30 allowing review and approval of employee
caretaker units on an individual basis pursuant to 1,
Section 3-8.13.
Ts,
5. If asbestos is found in any of the existing buildings R', ;?.which are to be demolished, the Applicant shall comply
with the Colorado State Emissions Standards for i'•..
Asbestos.
r
6. The Applicant shall be limited to two gas log fireplaces
per building as represented in the General Submission.
The Applicant shall be allawed, however, to appeal to
the Clean Air Board in order to provide a plan which
creates less air quality impacts to the area.
7. The Applicant shall contact the Environmental Health
Department for comment should mineral waste, waste rock v
or mine dumps be encountered during the excavation phase
of the project. Disposal of such materials off-site is 1`
discouraged due to the possibility of excessive heavy
metals being present in the soil. This is particularly
pertinent to fill material on the site which has been
transported from the Little Nell Ski slope. r,;;
8. No individual multi-family unit shall exceed 4,800
square feet and the cumulative floor area for all free
market multi-famiiy units in the project shall not
exceed 148,000 square feet. Floor area calculations for
these units shall not include sub-surface parking. All
parking for those units shall be underground. Because
of the exemption of underground parking from floor area a
computations, the multi-family units shall not be
entitled to the 750 square feet exemption for on-grade 6;, ?
parking structures. The floor area allowed shall be
calculated by the regulations in effect at the time of
final plat approval.
9. The historic portion of the barn on the south side of
3:! , r
the project shall not be demolished. It may be moved
y..!
I .
r%.i
4 ^
i
y;
s;
r--+*,,
r
zfl.y.F'r•
Q'l y?':y;..
7
1~
i.:'.x.: :.c,
K
wo
A''srs. Ht,-k.,.
nr.'
169
y".*y
sa ,i
R°'x; r r y,4.i JS"k°au, n ' s '' 'o- 1-
wwy '_ t M .
w.. `t# J ,w.°t N`r'
n ,ti`
Y
Y, .F.'f r tia?., F . ',` -»i ,y^+ F ia s i`:
A , y w.a l '4'
4
r'
1d . . .. .. f. .
r . . .il!BC'x ih... .
i _
C'S`.M t'Lr.
3367 6 +9/3/91 2::26 Rec .OcJ BY.. 657 F'C'i 313
M Silvia Dsvis, Pitkin Cnty C1erF:, Doc- $.U 7
Resolution No. 91-,/1L
Page 8 I:
intact or disassembled and moved to another location on
or off the Pfister Ranch property. t .
10. The Applicant shall comply with 404 approval for
wetlands disturbance from the Army Corp of Engineers as
outlined in the Army Corp letter with conditions dated
March 19, 1991 and attached here as Exhibit "E".
li. In connection with the appzoval, the BOCC agrees and
makes the following findings:
a. The Applicant is leasing or acquiring 19.3 acres of
the adjacent Pfeifer Parcel. The remainder of the
Pfeifer parcel, other than 19.3 acres, is currentlyy improved with one residential dwelling unit and may
only be further developed upon compliance with
Section 5-510 and all other applicable requirements
of the Pitkin County Land Use Code.
b. The Applicant is obtaining 245.4 acres of the 249.8
acre Pfister Parcel. The remaining 4. 4 acre parcel
is currently improved with one residential dwelling
unit and may only be further developed upon
4 compliance with Section 5-510 and all other
applicable requirements of the Land IIse Code.
However, in accordance with BOCC Resolution 89- 61,
the owner of either parcel (the 245.5 or the 4.4
acres) may ntilize the square footage of the three
residential dwelling units (a total of 5,015 square
y;s; feet) currently located on the 250 acre application
parcel to build not more than three residehtial
dwelling units totaling 5,015 square feet, if the
existing units are demolished. Such replacement is
y' subject to compliance with applicable zaning, 1041
i hazard review, and other requirements of the Land
Use Code. The replacement credit of 5,015 square
feet is an addition to any other residential
density described or approved in this resolution.
c. This approval of the Pfister Ranch/Golf application
shall be vested in the Applicant upon the signing
nl,.i of this Resolution and shall run with the land.
12. The Club use is approved pursuant to conditions found in5~;
Resolution No s. 79-26 and 83-90, and said use may be
ti", expanded and modified pursuant to this approvaL
f'_
4 13. The public dedication of Tiehack Road, the underpass
connector from Tiehack Road to relocated Stage Road and i
t' relocated Stage Road and the public right to use surface
parking at the base of Tiehack Ski Area shall be shown
r
1-
j•
C,I+
Y'9
4
4'r'S , V.Ymfs:4. .-iI:',,y.t:
q. tr
A`(.,
r.
Y.+s;,'
g'
N..
r_q"4 y..
A:
F'
y, .'..170
1 j.`
c
t?i >t34 s
y, ,
f ' r i i
r _ + . a
i,;. i t "'
3 x8 t -.w;.
r`r.
f.'r rf`""v kT.V,t i r t , .;
i
a+a3 fir.y.. p
J,',i'', ''i.i: .t 3 "'''.:'r ..aBY dt--:-s xt,a iD}`li;+!'"y?S tti:,:
k336i 28 r 9/23i91 SJ:LC Rec ,pf gF, 657 FG 314SilviaDavis, FiEkin Cnty Clerk, Doc $,uj
Resolution No. 91-
Page 9
on the Final Plat. Use of the Tiehack parking lot by
the public shall be on a year-round, daytime basis. The
dedication of Tiehack Road is for the public to access
the Tiehack parking lot to reach public lands and trails
over which the public may have easements. No parkinq of
vehicles by members of the public shall be permitted on
Tiehack Road. The right of the public to park cars at
the Tiehack base lot shall be limited by the number of
parking spaces available to the public (no less than 121
spaces shall be available at all times). Rights are
reserved in Applicant to encroach upon, over or under
any dedicated rights-of-way for ski lifts, signage or
inEormation structures, sidewalks, trails, utilities,
i:`;:,:_,,'; bridges or tunnels, or for other purposes consistent
i' with this approval of the project. All signage on
Tiehack Road shall be insta2led by the Applicant,
t; including signage by the County. The County does not
accept any maintenance obligation as to Tiehack Road or
i the Tiehack base parking area. The County does not have
the right to expand or change Tiehack Road
specifications without amendment of the PUD approvals.
Maintenance of relocated Stage Road (from Highway 82 to
the intersection with existing Stage Road) and the
underpass connector from Tiehack Road to relocated Stage
Road shall be performed pursuant to an agreement between
a',, ` the Applicant and the County prior to issuance of
A> permits to construct the relocated Stage Road.
i
14. No further subdivision of the PUD shall be allowed
except in connection with the condominiumization of any7.Ss.:„: elements of the project subject to obtaining any
4_`: required approvals pursuant to the Pitkin County Land
w;;`; Use Code.
1:"`
15. In the winter, the aerial lift, which may be constructed
ti;
at Applicant's ahoice on Lot 16, shall be available to
the public at no charge, but otherwise subject to safety
and operational rules of any regulatory agency. If a
lift is not constructed, an alternative means of
crossing Tiehack Road will be provided for nordic skiing
y;;`''j and pedestrians.
z;
16. All utilities shall be placed within driveways and major
roadways unless otherwise specified on the utilities
master plan submitted with the detailed submission.
I
t..'; 17. Portions of the golf course area may be used by the
r='+ public at no charge in the winter as part of the nordic
R I trail system. Specific trail locations shall be
approved annually by the Applicant. Trails will avoidh,; .'..I
n.'
greens, tees and other man made features or obstacles.
t.y-.0C'.?ri '
y,.
u` _ .
Y;lq..
MS,,
Y.., • fj f.
ZP iµ-_'_ 7 tµ
i..h' "
i.
f
i
k
r'xiX
3tiw::
171
N t`
F'','„, ;,
t; ,
a ;
i y K,u., : b s i.. 7 9,}y .
Y 1 A.,+4ri6. 13'
s` , w
y '
f.
t ...
C,
t8'9'.
4' Fwy' r x n
t
7 i°e k.'{c t'
f
1 .
X
1
1, r`{ 'w
y ..'t { ,. . . "
y . ."
a° . .... . ..
1,L M1`jay f e n,1 1 j,,y., k'''''i"sa*1.W ' M-",y'Xd5KR 7!n.`.
i y _
r
336728 C q/23/qi 15:26 Rec ,On E+h' 657 FG 315SilviaDavis, FitSr.in Cnty Clerk, Doc .GO
Resolution No. 91-
Page l0
r .
18. All new trails along Highway 82 shall take the expansion i'.:,,•.-.
of the highway into consideration when developing the r``-
specific trail alignment and design.
19. All buildings on the property requirinq water and sewer
service shall be provided with central water and sewer
service. No individual or private systems shall be
allowed within the PUD. I
S .
20. The sprinkler system for the qolf course shall be
supplied by a water source provided for in Applicant's
agreement with the City of Aspen dated July 9, 1990.
j The domestic water needs of the development shall be
supplied pursuant to an agreement with the City of Aspen
dated July 9, 1990.
21. The Applicant shall not allow the use of poisons for
rodent control except upon approval of the County via an
amendment to the PUD. 1'
22. For all buildings within the PUD, building height shall
I be measured pursuant to the Land Use Code provisions in
I effect at the time of issuance of a building permit with s
the exception as noted in Exhibit "C', the Bulk and Area
Chart, Note #2.
i
23. All representations of the Applicant shall become
conditions of approvaL j"i
j II. Prior to Final Plat Approval by the BOCC the Applicant shall
adequately address the following:
1. The Applicant shall submit an avigation easement
acceptable to the County Attorney. The relocation of
the KSNO tower is approved by the County subject to
further approval of the Detailed Plans and
Specifications by the Pitkin County Airport Manager and _
FAA. i':;
4i '. .
Y
2. Prior to final plat approval, a water quality monitoring
pragram shall be approved by the Environmental Health
Department for the golf course and adjacent areas. i ' iV .
3. The free market townhouses will be owner-occupied and/or
long term rentals for a minimum of six months with two 1
shorter tenancies each year, and a deed restriction to I"
this effect shall be provided prior to final plat and
recorded with final plat.I. '
i„ :. .
i
ii ,
1
f • -..i
j_,, 1 j1{;t.:. t.x.,/
t
P
J
Fly 172
W rrr _—_
1-
v'j..Y. '
S R '
a
S ) 13
ta .
q
i x.,.' K; + j y '
it i`.n j
i a F'+•,a •"' 's"• r
itu.,'+t' . r , k> t ,_ •:` ' • .,x,y+-c W" l,
t -:{' t^ '
a o .'{. Y.iB t t J 2 J'ih 1,. y '„.
c, .
s t 7t
lC.
A __ ..
ri .. .. .,. . .. e,.,.'S`
rw'
i Yc-.
336,H t 9/3/92 15:26 Rec .Gti NK.. b57 PG 316
Silvia Davis, F•itk:in Cnty Cler•4s, Doc $.U
Resolution No. 91-
Page 11
4. Reference is made to the lands conveyed to the County in
that certain Deed recorded in Book 333 at Page 897 which
is a portion of the current AABC pedestrian trail. The 1r
County shall, by special warranty deed, convey said
lands to Applicant free and clear of any liens or af"
encumbrances in exchange for a relocated AABC pedestrian
trail which meets County approved trail specifications.
It is the responsibility of the Applicant to relocate
and construct such a traiL
5. A lot line adjustment for the Alcohol Rehabilitation
Unit facility is approved provided that:
I i
a. The Alcohol Rehabilitation Unit plat shall be
amended to reflect the lot line adjustment
approvaL
b. The approval of the Pfister Ranch/GOlf application,
including the Alcohol Rehabilitation Unit lot line
adjustment, will not alter, amend or limit, in any
manner whatsoever, any or all of the uses,
i exemptions and terms currently applicable to the
property of Alcohol Rehabilitation unit under
Resolution 83-133 and that such uses, exemptions
and terms shall continue to apply without any
k:; alteration, amendment or limitation whatsoever to
t the property of the Alcohol Rehabilitation Unit.
6. Prior to signature of final plat, the Applicant shall
verify that there is an agreement in place with the
z+ .Aspen Consolidated Sanitation District.
a;
K III. Ia the Subdivision Improvement Aqreement the Applicant shall
J:i
commit to the followinq;
1. Prior to Final Plat or excavation permit for the
v,_ project, the Applicant shall submit a SIA, including a
cost estimate for infrastructure and public
improvements. At this time, the Applicant shall submit
security acceptable to the County Attorney and BoCC
7 insuring the construction of the infrastructure and
public improvements, and/or reclamation of the
property.The Subdivision Improvements Agreement shall
i,,;{ include a schedule for construction of improvements and
associated bonding requirements. a
a 2. The SIA shall ensure that the all ponds shall be lined
to ensure water retention. The specific techniques used
a to ensure water retention, such as rock lined areas and
i"a floatable traps, shall be addressed in the SIA.
F`'I
c•
i'':;I
F':•.
G ri'?
r .
z=;
t.."
i
y
i
r•.''i`"``
r5. a;i.t.i
ra'173
1°'"
S' + S
H•
t .
1 M1.: Y.#
lC'
ASI r•ry 1 .i ..._'fl`.' . N
r i x t: .•:.,i J
x % ` : .,°rA}'1';3+
y .
L .1-
3',.,'`}'
i6
y Y'
t
i', F a '
t c ''-
0 , ' h ki.
y{(r,_ ,ra:rz,e . . .
w .. .t _u . .J': . . . . .. . ... .
33672B 79/2/91 15:<6 Fec .00 F3Y, 657 F'G 317
Silvia Davis, F'itkin Cnty Cler•k, Doc $.QU
s Resolution No. 91-
Page 12
3. No proliferation of algae in any water course downstream
j of the development shall be allowed to occur as a result
of the development.i
4. The Applicant shall construct and deliver a public bus
stop shelter along each side of Iiighway 82 at the time
construction of the Stage Road/Tiehack Road underpass is
completed. The Applicant is responsible for 100$ of the
cost of construction of the shelters. The Applicant
shall design such shelters based upon recommendations
from the Roaring Fork Transit Agency.
5. Nordic Trail connections shall be constructed by the
Applicant between the City golf course and the
y Government Trail via the existing trail along Maroon
Creek to the extent they are within project boundaries.
Overpasses, underpasses or other on-grade solutions
f.:, shall be provided where practical to cross the roads
i within the development.
6. If determined necessary by the County and upon the
t County s written request therefor, the Applicant shall
grant easements for and construct a trail easement along
i the south side of Highway 82, along their property
boundaries.
7. When the existing AABC trail is relocated and
constructed by the Applicant, it shall be upgraded to
Y• i accommodate current trail standards adopted by the
County and in place at the time of development.
a.
8. Commencing after use of the existing Tiehack parking
areas is no longer available, the Applicant (or
Homeowners Association) shall cause to be provided van
y service from the base of Tiehack ski area to Rubey Park
on race days and other maximum traffic days. The plan
for this van service shall be submitted annually to the
i Planning Office on October 1 for approval.
i
9. Until such time as the Highway 82 pedestrian underpass
described in condition #15 below is constructed,
Applicant shall cause an internal van service to be
j provided to residents of the employee housing complex.
V
By "internal van service, the parties mean within the
I
Project to the Tiehack parkinq lot and RFTA bus stop on
the south side of State Highway 82, and from residences
j
to the Club. A plan for van service adequate to meet
the needs of the residents of the employee housing
complex shall be submitted annually to the Planning
Office for approval on October 1. When the construction
of the pedestrian underpass is completed, van service to
I
tr
4
a, . '(',_ _._.,: ...... ...
r...
v`M1 l. N Tj'.;.,.,;
z",c,,:r:'.
r .-x.-S r"s;,,.:
k.;.,;Y r'
a ve++;„. -.. t:.,~
f.•
r'.`,'
ry
j;;,
sY}r::
g+.y,
v.
174
w
4,`;:.
5"i..
S i
S`i r u: Y , ..
1 , y.e:F s
t," ' , .`,,3 , ,
s* ,k,. k''-, h`
b.
k
k f' `
y p 1 i;
j '
t
w.ay- YrStisr . °"
P,'-i H%Y'
U'.t,k:l ir'J;_ ...iLr'- .. .,.. s, . i " _.+'.F h
f
yt i.,'t
j
336i^8 n9/23/91 15:26 Fec ti.i G B1C 657 FG 318
Silvia Davis, Pitkin Cnty Cler1;, Doc ffi.GU
Resolution No. 91-
Page 13
the employee housing complex shall be discontinued and
van service may be on an "on call" basis for the free-
market units.
r .
10. Prior to final plat approval the Applicant shall submit
a temporary erosion control plan which is acceptable to
the Environmental Health Bepartment and the Engineering
Department. This plan shall specifiaally deal with
erosion concerns of the construction oE the golf course
and major regrading of the Tiehack area. A specific
cost estimate for the erosion control plan shall be
j outlined and secured as part of the SIA.
11. The Applicant shall vegetate in accordance with the
approved landscaping plan all areas that are disturbed
by new construction and removal of any existinq
residence within one year after a certi£icate of
occupancy is received for any improvements. This I
assurance shall be made as part of the SIA. f
12. The Applicant shall be required to provide a Subdivision t:
Improvement Agreement which includes an acceptable
phasing schedule (including but not limited to
landscaping, construction of publia infrastructure and f'
amenities.) The Applicant shall acquire approval from
the BOCC in order to substantially amend the schedule.
This would occur at a public hearing as do all j
I amendments to a PUD. Staff may approve insubstantial
amendments to the schedule. The £inancial assurances
for all improvements shall be tied to a specific
schedule.
13. The Applicant shall provide all necessary trail
easements through the deve2opment in order to make
access to the Government trail viable from the west side
of Maroon Creek. The year-round trail easement along
4 Maroon Creek (ditch trail) and access from the Tiehack i
parking lots shall lirilc to the Government trail. I ,
Furthermore, the Appliaant shall agree to a final
realignment of the Government trial easement which is
acceptable to the USFS and provides a connection to the
existing trail from Iselin Park.
s
t 14. The AppZicant shall provide 50 (with $300, 00o as a cap)
of the cost of construction of a pedestrian bridge
across Maroon Creek. The Applicant shall provide an
easement on their property and the community shall be
responsible for acquiri.ng the easement on the Moore
i east) side of the creek. The total financial
j commitment to construction of the bridge shall be in
place within three years of the final approval of the
ryLi
5
9
It-
sP - - - -.._ .....
l'
s..
a .
4
p^. • LJ_Y.t:i
w;"
t
i
tCr'S`1;?''`. .
iaY.,.+.
e,'.;¢?:r
s,,,;.,.:5.
i st..
r,
a;a,.175
cr
d e ,
ry,, ''si y<1;"* v. :"
Y . ttti.;'t,, .y fi
A ^"v . 5j { a t3', ``' ',[
Tf '
4 ,eK 4. t .
tr.. .
k h Y '`
t
t- "ti J k
C
f"a.
z
y 1.
X .!. . .. . . . ` _ T
4 f. . .._. . .'r . . ..K
31 is i..
3367L8 49/23/9i 15:,:^•.6 F ec .f1U &f: 657 fiG 31.9SilviaDavis, Fit{;in Cnty C1erF: Doc .QQt
4 .
Resolution No. 91—ffL
Page 14
PUD. If construation of the bridge has not commenced
within three (3j years from final approval, the
Applicant shall make a $100,060 donation to the Pitkin r
County open Space Board Eor the purchase of trails
within the County in full satisfaction of its it.I'`
obligations hereunder.
15. The Applicant shall construct a pedestrian underpass to
accommodate pedestrians in the vicinity of the employee
housing complex and to serve as a trail Iink between the7owlCreekbikepathandtheAABCbikepath. To complete
this link and depending upon the exact location of the E
underpass, the County may have to obtain easements from
f adjacent property owners. This underpass shall be j'.,
constructed at such time as the highway is widened r
which is projected within the next five years) . The
Applicant shall be responsible for 100 oP the cost of I.
the underpass. If, in fact, the uttderpass is built at
the expense of another agency such as the Highway
Department, the Applicant shal]. transfer the financial
commitment to the cost of the Maroon Creek bridge. This
2 arrangement and the projected cost of the underpass
shall be outlined in the SIA.
E
j Iv. Covenants:
1. The Applicant commits to require that all residential
buildings incorporate the followinq water conservation
devices in their designs: toilets (tank-type flusho-
meter) per flush - 1.5 gallons; urinals per flush - 1.0
1 gallons; low flow shower heads.
2. An ongoing water quality monitoring program, including
a schedule, shall be submitted by the Applicant and
approved by Environmental Health Department and shall
i run with the land via the subdivision covenants.
1
I 3. Commencing after use of the existing Tiehack parking
1 areas is no longer available, the Applicant (or
Homeowners Association) shall cause to be provided van
service from the base of Tiehack ski area to Rubey Fark
on race days and other maximum traffic days. The plan
for this van service shall be submitted annually to the
Planning Office on October 1 for approval.Y'
4. No dogs shall be allowed in the emplayee housing
complex, and any dogs on the property shall be leashed
or kenneled.
5. The Plat and/or Einal PUD will include a note to the
4?" effect that in approved building envelopes, no
i
1
F=
ai n:'_ i:'"
d.` {.
rt;i.C:i.
r trc;
4
STY.
F!i;
176
Y IiliYWl
J:''n
J"
li
tf;
w. .
r `l {k.'° 'IK,T t -
sc
1 1"r l.r p
rv '
y
t'
f "F: wi:L `Ean rk k.v 4a t i
1.. .
r. . ., . • 9 x t.
3367.^B q9/23/91 15:b Rec .r} gh 657 F'G 320
Silvia Davis F'itkin Cnty Cleri;, Doc .OU
a
Resolution No. 91-
Page 15
development will be allowed on slopes exceeding 30 with
the exception of Lots 12 and 17 through 40 where any 30 t
slopes shall be graded out pursuant to the approved i',
detailed submission grading plan.
6. Grading and berming along the Highway 82 corridor on the
north side shall screen major views of the clubhouse,
townhomes and employee housing units, yet allow
occasional open views of the golf course from Highway
82. Subject to timely review by the Board so as not to
delay construction by Applicant, reasonable
modifications to the gradinq plan may be agreed to by
Applicant and the Board whereupon the grading plan shall
be modified to accomplish screening and open view
objectives. f .'
7. Provided the Pomegranate East Condominiums, by a writing
sufficient for such purposes, agrees, on or before t
recording of final plat, to abandon its existing right
to access Highway 82 as granted in Deed qf Easement f,
recorded in Book 308 at Page 962, Applicant will, at its
y expense, at the time of the construction of the new
Tiehack Road, pave any unpaved portions of that
Pomegranate easement area, pave any unpaved portions of
the existing parkinq area and provide an alternative
access to Highway 82 west of the existing access at a
specific location to be approved by the State Highway
Department and County Engineering. When the alternative
a access is completed, the existing Pomegranate access to
Highway 82 shaZ2 be abandoned. Should the Pomegranate
East Condominiums not timely agree to abandon its right
a to the existing Highway 82 access, Applicant shall have
no obligation to perform any of this condition and t
existing parking and access to Highway 82 for the f.
Pomegranate East Condominiums will remain unchanged.
8. If, in the opinion of the State Highway Department or
the county Sheriff's Department, any construction
results in any unsafe traffic conditions on Highway SZ,
or at current Stage Road intersection, Applicant will I:
implement appropriate traffic control measures such as
signs, £lagmen, or the like to mitigate such conditions i'
to the satisfaction oE the BOCC.
9. As part of the employee housing complex on the north
i side of Highway 82 and if an agreement satisfactory to
Applicant and the County can be consummated by November
l, 1991, Applicant will construct up to ten (10)
additional units; provided that the County shall, during
the couzse of the design and construction, pay all costs i,
hard and soft) associated with such additional units
yrI
I :.1
i- '
i
1.:. .:; ... . : :..? -.
x,,..
a:%;";y,
i'''°
Y,i
dK•^`[4:'
PiJ^
177
i s ' ° -''
1 NY>y
t J'fr ,„` .{ , y ,y k'S#,•,'. , ' F,a= ^s '. !i f j r+
LF
n
f S a kd,}F u i4 '7 '`1.1+Y1%(.. „ .,l r p '" ..,{k i
cn. ''1 r e'it Yr, t Y r
d .,
s c,
r i'tii;,
J. ._ . J 9i{`t,<n y..
3 6728 09/23/91 i5:26 Fiec 'S.O gF; 657 FG 321 r..
Silvia Davis, Pitkin Cnty Cler4;, Doc .4
Resolution No. 91- cr.
Page 16
together with all management and operation costs
associated therewith.
10. The Applicant shall provide, as part of the SIA, a
commitment to a water quality monitoring program, which
will address the chemical treatment as well as
landscaping features of the project. An ongoing
monitoring schedule shall be established and run with
the land via the subdivision covenants, and initial cost
during construction and first 5 years of operation shall P
be established as part of the Subdivisiol Improvement 4 r
Agreement.
r,
V. Prior to Issuanca of Suilding Permit:
r
1. Prior to issuance of a building permit for any
underground parking structure, involving underqround
parking or maintenance areas, a registered ventilation
engineer shall approve the design to insure that harmful
levels of pollutants are not qenerated inside or vented
i outside of the structure.
2. The Applicant shall submit a fugitive dust plan to be
approved by the Environme»tal Health Department prior to
issuance of an excavation or building permit for all
portions of the project.
1
3. The Applicant shall obtain approval from the County
Engineer for a construction/landscape license on the
portion of Stage Road affected by the proposal.
vI. In connection with the approval, the BoCC agrees and makes
the followinq fiadinqs:
i 1. The following laed use approvals, which are inconsistent
with the approvals set forth in this Resolution, shall
i be deemed vacated and terminated:
i Resolution No. 81-28, Book 408 at Page 685
Resolution No. 81-126, Book 418 at Page 771
Resolution No. 83-72, Book 447 at Page 837
Resolution No. 83-104, Book 453 at Page 360 j
only with respect to the interest of
Applicant in the Zoline Foundation PUD)
Final Plat for Aspen Racquet Club Subdivision,
Sook 11 at Page 55
2. The foZlowing easements or other agreements of record
shall be terminated and the chairman (or in his absence,
vice chairman) of the BOCC is authorized to enter into
a such agreements as shall be necessary to terminate and
i i;::
L fl
rfii'6;i"'c.
r.Y?.r.,,
Q', -
dy.:d"S. ''
r"C'i. , .
H.`;!.ti.
i i,:
g; 4#
N..
178
4F:;
7u- ... ' Y .l, 'k_oa . ,.,,,, ..4 G ',•' s y,y.F, .n
t '
t
4. °, ,.
u" u ' e-a r,,,Ar '
1:
D .'' .. V. k' 4. 6 J d y 't. , '.!4s .i: 1 7
1 r,...,Ah.. ' •
1 _
3!'a
1' .
ef.3 C=l .!'. . _o-... L'l:ir,.... .)._' ,. .. ._:._ ., 't:yy ynFQI'
36728 G9/3/91 LJ:LG Rec .49 bpo65 7.U 322
Silvia Davis, F'itkin Cnty Clerk:,
Resolution No. 91-
Page 17
extinguish of record said easements and other
agreements:
r ...
Book 343 at Paqe 120
Book 408 at Page 874
Book 408 at Page 881
Book 408 at Page 885
Book 431 at Page 221
Book 530 at Paqe 459
Book 531 at Page 213
3. The following is an inventory of the existing land use
i approval resolutions for the Grand Champions, which
resolutions shall, except as provided herein, continue
y in effect together with all additional square footage
and uses approved in this Resolution.
i
Resolution No. 79-26, Book 364 at Page 96
Resolution No. 83- 90, Book 450 at Page 950
4. Reference is made to the lands conveyed to the County in
that certain Deed recorded in Book 333 at Page 897 which
is a portion of the current AABC pedestrian trail. The
County shall, by special warranty deed, convey said
lands to MCDC free and clear of any liens or
tl encumbrances in exchange for a relocated AABC pedestrian
trail which meets County approved trail specifications.
It is the responsibility of the Applicant to relocate
and construct such trail.
5. This approval of the Pfister Ranch/Golf application
shall be vested in the Applicant upon the signing of
this Resolution and shall run with the land. No party,
other than Applicant (or any person receiving an
assi nment of all org part of Applicant s rights
Y hereunder) and the County (or the public by and through
the County), shall be a beneficiary of this Resolution.
IV•!
6. As relates to this specific development proposal, the
Applicant shall receive credit in GMQS competition in
future years for benefits and amenities as scored in the
1988, 1989 and 1990 applications.
I 7. No excavation, demolition and/or grading permits shall
be allowed until such time there is an adequate legal
and financial agreement with the City of Aspen for a i
water supply, as approved by the County attorney.
JI 8. No issuance of any building permits for the project
c? shall be allowed until such tirae an adequate water
y
supply is in place.
i
4 i
a . , .
w
I:o-;=."{
1fl T.-k:`,"Yti`'. x.,R
r
v `
t1'._
y'
r_,k-.
5.±
s ..
A"
Y
7°l^.u.:'.
179
CTJ.
i y*'
r.,itf.
i y ,5) '
f' L
r'+
i.
e
r.
Y14 '
Z F i j-p{§'.
r vyV '
1, '
3 ti;dc,y ` Y=-t
4 y k. 2: {. + +.1 a
J' t rx;., -
C • y,c
t ;: ct .n a -d•,i
k.• , '1+. V M1 . . .. ...oM{h'S iF:.
i
36728 U9/23/91 15:26 Fiec $.UO BY., 657 PG 323
Silvia Davis, Pitkin Cnty Clerkk Doc S.pO
Resolution No. 91- i:
Page 28
F.'..
1
APPROVED by the Board at its regular meeting on June 11,
i
1991.
i i.
BOARD OB COIINTY COMMI88IONERB I;'.'.,
OF PITRIN COUNTY COLORADO
BY ' ,,...a._. r-w.._
m True, Vice-Chairman
y IIte S,-l-. 9. 441_
ATTEST:
TMa; i .
II ,
J anette Jon ,
eputy Count Clerk
z,.
6 APPRO D A8 TO FORM• Ap O ED AS TO CONTENT:
1 L•
f,,
Timo hy Wh tsitt, Am Marqar , i'
Coun y A t rney pl inq Dire or
n-airdR
7'. boccreso.pfisterdnew
i
t ChairtnanWayneEthridgevoting E'
7
Commissbner Ross vobng
Commissaner True voting 1Z-
Commissioner Tuite voting
Commi;sioner Crowley voting S d!
s:
a"fi I
Si
J:
t
i r 7
t:.
W v__ _ :._,... ....,._ _. r .
r
y
180
3 cr wYpr'
r`.
C t rF : .
t ._:
Yt -a n yr i .a:
r t .
jy.
y.,]`) #
I . '' 1"f'
n S
4 1 • 1 il'•,° R
Y14'SJti h S ;, t. .... y _ 3:i
i Y , 1r , ,
r t
S .;ww y
y, '(--`4 4
e
ya'
4 .,My{ . .
l r 1. .
r, •1 5'It
1-..._.T.'.t i.i4...J1[••iJ{i.R
Y yt1+1l.!.1'li i '.`. f.....'S,. 1/•_aw. - . •,SN.. 3, .. .:. . .7YS*{lf.,'
Lxiuui n
6`"V" AB a
5 2000 ,
aDo ,000 a000
1 l . y v,;Ji- ' . ` , f--
il ti rdy.. AirR•r ¢ . , . ti ,, , 1 ( . ,
1
R ' "
k \
rU j o l ; \' ` 11`\
i
l'/ r ..
eP c 11 ,, . k-' .`
T``
4n – '
I
j {'i i i i;p ti 1
i 1 __ _ . :1 }!1
N ' ,
Z, f. i
1.
rt
il
l
I 1 1' u ' v ur}il 1`l '. .
I f "qf I n ( iir'
Y j .t.eriip Frara n i ` -'--o-
i 1j+ .'.
i j'+`:' ' , :''-'',11Y'< %'`.
1 •:.• '.„•`.' .1 l w '' ' .i c+ ((`
4 Ip C p ft.tl
1,\
i:+..
s z ' : r , , t,,,t«
k ",\ O rme Zo4ne ' , n
4 a `\ iGri.;,1; t a :. 4
a iampi r x -
a .
II i 4 ,,
f • at ` ' y.
u 3ulf'rmillc ki
14jw, (4a •
i ',
a
I i ;, Aspen . 1f(+
J
yr ; . ,
feif r y,Inn Municipal a; -;;
Got( Course '"r yj > \ . ui i couir.:i. r.. i
l , r;` y' '
4 .
i
x
i I' `.
J';,11: Site. ,Aspen `, Red'Roof ";j
s l Tennis' `.r
ilo .Club .
1 .. 'i t;'•,+ g .Subdivision ',j'fo Aspen
t- s': ,i Jj?, , a
f ...' ;f, , , ,I,,.
1`I r1ti
a i , } ;, feliapkS ; se i Asq n H jh,-__ " t.
f , ,it,,z,,kl;f Y a,.y Park and Micidle \, '(",i_
t' ' 'r
a J ` ' --> Schools
1 r i`,°` . . . 1a
i ' . \ i N . i w.i t
In 6 4
1 1 ji's'
1;
i. - I"/. , t`/. Ir,
i / r
Stt . / . _ 7
1.I
J / 1lf ,'` ,•_, /. y,'
i:jl / / /, d, • `,
P r1.. ` . ..;. 4 i+;!' r : ' w;: igh tids , , , ;,
j' /i''Sk A a / :, i ., 4r l y I C ,/ / '6
w
i W" l.' I) .i '` { l° .iFi
i ` - 'I ,y i
i j/ ,. ''
I /
p'
i ' I i 1
r .'i . i
1: ,.. - ( ;- I '%---i' ` I li ' 1,,ti ( 7,
i i..• ! J/.. r i.' _ il , .
I
To Maroon l3ells
3'6728 09/^c3/91 15:26 Fec .00 5K 657 PG 324
Silvia Davis, Pitk.in Cnty Clerk, Doc .0
i ...x
4
ti : .
t y. 1q,b . '
t
i'
J
r.•,
yr.v:
a:%;',•.,ii.
W
h]'181
Y,
i i` '
c !'S'j s. y r,.'' .+'.
K[. ; .aJ .. f a. Y ';. n .:`' ;
7 ra:
p;
s :
p}, - >
i, J 1.r t
i$
F°"'14y,.
n} ,
y .
a M1 .w.
r.. Y,F Yi.. { '
i5'LaK.,} rl ri "+y- :
u,y` K i t
4i.
t'+Yf.s ,
u . .. '
i} .. .
1' t Y
t
f UG 27 '91 12 03 GARFIEID & FECHT. P.C. P.4i4
336728 C 9/23/91 15:26 Fec .J BY. 657 PG 325
Silvia Davis, Pit4:in Cnty Cler4;, Doc .Gc]
s
r
A. Exisdn Underl in 2eninp-Oamed Y,and:
Zone Acr s t
j,,- .
o
AF-2 PUD 153.0
AF-SKI
299.1
j B. xisti 1n a YL nnirie-jgn,„se Laitd:
I 4II4
ARSHI 5.4
i A'-2.Y TJb 4,1,
70.1*
I C5ry of Aspcn 45.5
70.1
i
I
j
I
rI yi '° .
jfi', : -
i I
r
i. .
i '`i'
i :
3 i I•7es .a 7 '
j::
T . _.
4y
i r.,
F':..- .
0.'k. y tT4dif: d'4C`: 4
y,;,'
e'.:*R{. . _ .1 -
Y,.,
I
182
a`
i
.
f
ti
-
kwd
1
*
w,
:
.
,
.
3t
t
'
,
j.
,
"
`
"
i'
'
l{
j;
`
kt
4
`
`
k
e
7F
1
A'
i
s.
:
°
i
'
E,
1
A
f
r
"
y
Xk
F.
i.
'
4L
t
:
i
r-
t'
'
i
4
s
'
t.
„
`
r`
'
t'
f
T'
A'
T.
.
9
1
rr
"
„
.
.
f:
.
'
.
.
.
.
,
n
.
,
f,
•
,
9
t
.
r
iF
P
J
-
1
y
i.
f
Z
'
S
'
S
'
s
t
0
7
7
j
7.
7
7
7
7
?
:
C
'
n
N
'
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
m„
B
3
3
c
c
c
c
c
c
c
c
c
D
m
rn
na
w
i
u
-
•
33
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
?
33
33
I
a
xo
tS
2
s
m
m
Q
c
m
r.
.
°
.
r
.
Ir
T
I
g
v
c
cr
3
'
m
or
e
'
o
m
m
w
Qv
DD
;
i
w
3
p1
3
3
0
3
3
0
,
y
-
C
m
m
m
Z
o
y
_
=
a,
a
°
'
o
0
0
P7
3'
c
z
3,
3
3
w
w
o
o
cn
a
c
c
$
$
'
m
70
'
'
:
.
3
3
m
oo
Tl
(
)
o
b
m
m
m
'
m
w
w
w
Ny
m
Nw
ww
°
mm
Rl
fn
o'
00
3
c
oo
`
"
x
;
=
A
O
—
o
.
°
.
r.
°
mz
w
mm
an
zr
C
ZT
I
C
N
N
C
S
3
p
.
-
-
L'
c-
'
L'
N
m
A
N
A
fD
p
lj
,
'
(
n
m
ci
ag
m
wa
ov
m
a
c,
3
3
tn
o
N
m
cyo
Z
cp
m
3
Z-
n
y
o
V
v
o
m
w
m.
.
A
y
?
p
i
o
o
1O
v
a
j
3
w
°
y3
y
o
r:
.
K
dp
O
N
i
G y
,
p
N
O
O
O
O
N
'
I1
1
N
,
.
'
.
0
n
n
i
y
O
O
C
j.
y
3
=
o
w
Nm
0
0
0
0
0
0
'
oo
,
m
o
C
Q
o
0
0
0
0
:
a'
p
C
o
°
o
s
1:
yn
'
C
.
9.
,
,
W
a
a
m
o
ya
a
;
?
NW
O
O
O
O
O
O
"
'
1
s
;
o,
w
v
c
o
:
t-
o0
v
w
N
3.
,
a
`
4
w
m
i
N
N
ON
D
O
O
O
O
O
O
r
:
Gl
j
O
O
O
p
p
C
:
f0
p
b
J.
41
y1
N
w'
.
f7
1
t
j
o
N'
T
y
S
1
J
N
ON
D
O
Oo
00
o
O
O
N
i
v
O
O
y
CJ
N
p
'
:
O
O
IV
O
O
O
O
:
r
Y'
,
A
o
N
!
~
71
6
0
O
O
O
p
n
V
Fi
)
3
[
p
0
i
j
i
y
"
.
ON
f
M
r
33
6
7
2
8
9/
3/
41
15
:
^
c6
Fe
c
,
00
bK
65
7
PG
32
6
Si
l
v
i
a
Da
v
i
s
,
F'
it
k
i
n
Cn
t
y
Cl
e
r
k
:
,
Do
c
•
UO
ti
u-
;
;
7>
,
}
;
s'
.
fl
,
-
t_
I
Y'
'
'
.
x,
'
+
r.
=
.
.
,
.
e.
;
.
,
Gn
.
"
.
+
'
.
.
K`
t.
_
.
.
.
1'
.6
f`
18
3