Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutLand Use Case.309 N 3rd St.A 109-00CASE NUMBER PARCEL ID # CASE NAME PROJECT ADDRESS PLANNER CASE TYPE OWNER/APPLICANT REPRESENTATIVE DATE OF FINAL ACTION CITY COUNCIL ACTION PZ ACTION ADMIN ACTION BOA ACTION DATE CLOSED BY A109-00 2735-124-24007 Gallant Residence DRAC 309 N. Third Sarah Oates DRAC Mel and Marylin Gallant Earl Anderson 10/3/00 Reso. #45-2000 Approved- Secondary 11 /7/00 J. Lindt w CIQ �i c�j DEVELOPMENT ORDER of the City of Aspen Community Development Department This Development Order, hereinafter "Order", is hereby issued pursuant to Section 26.304.070, "Development Orders", and Section 26.308.010, "Vested Property Rights", of the City of Aspen Municipal Code. This Order allows development of a site specific development plan pursuant to the provisions of the land use approvals, described herein. The effective date of this Order shall also be the initiation date of a three-year vested property right. The vested property right shall expire on the day after the third anniversary of the effective date of this Order, unless a building permit is approved pursuant to Section 26.304.075, or unless an exemption, extension, reinstatement, or a revocation is issued by City Council pursuant to Section 26.308.010. After Expiration of vested property rights, this Order shall remain in full force and effect, excluding any growth management allotments granted pursuant to Section 26.470, but shall be subject to any amendments to the Land Use Code adopted since the effective date of this Order. This Development Order is associated with the property noted below for the site specific development plan as described below. Mel and Marylin Gallant, 309 N. Third St., Aspen, CO 81611 Property Owner's Name, Mailing Address and telephone number North Y2 of Lots R & S, Block 35, City and Townsite of Aspen Legal Description and Street Address of Subject Property Secondary Mass Variance Written Description of the Site Specific Plan and/or Attachment Describing Plan Planning and Zoning Commission Resolution #45-2000, 10/3/00 Land Use Approval(s) Received and Dates (Attach Final Ordinances or Resolutions) October 14, 2000 Effective Date of Development Order (Same as date of publication of notice of approval.) October 15, 2003 Expiration Date of Development Order (The extension, reinstatement, exemption from expiration and revocation may be pursued in accordance with Section 26.308.010 of the City of Aspen Municipal Code.) Issued this 14th day of October, 2000, by the City of Aspen Community Devel-moment Director. Julie Woods, Community Development Director PUBLIC NOTICE Of DEVELOPMENT APPROVAL Notice is hereby given to the general public of the approval of a site specific development plan, and the creation of a vested property right pursuant to the Land Use Code of the City of Aspen and Title 24, Article 68, Colorado Revised Statutes, pertaining to the following described property: North 1/2, of Lots R & S, Block 35, City and Townsite of Aspen, by resolution of the Planning and Zoning Commission numbered 45, series of 2000. For further information contact Julie Ann Woods, at the Aspen/Pitkin Community Development Dept. 130 S. Galena St, Aspen, Colorado (970) 920-5090. s/City of Aspen Account Publish in The Aspen Times on October 14, 2000 Resolution No.46 (SERIES OF 2000) RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION APPROVING A VARIANCE TO THE RESIDENTIAL DESIGN STANDARDS FOR "SECONDARY MASS" AND A VARIANCE TO THE SETBACK REQUIREMENTS OF THE R-6 ZONE DISTRICT FOR THE NORTH V2 OF LOTS R AND S, BLOCK 35, 309 N. THIRD STREET, CITY OF ASPEN, PITKIN COUNTY, COLORADO. Parcel No. 2735-124-24007 WHEREAS, the Community Development Department received an application from Mel and Mary Gallant, owners, represented by Earl Anderson of Anderson Design, for a variance from the Residential Design Standards and Variances from the dimensional requirements of Chapter 26 of the Aspen Municipal Code for the north %2 of Lots R and S, Block 35, 309 N. Third; and, WHEREAS, the property located at 309 N. Third is a 3,000 square foot, located in the R-6 Zone District, and currently contains a single-family dwelling; and, WHEREAS, pursuant to Section 26.410.020 of the Aspen Municipal Code, Community Development Department staff reviewed the applicant's application for compliance with the Residential Design Standards of Section 26.410.040 of the Aspen Municipal Code and found the submitted development application to be inconsistent with Standard 26.410.040(B)(1), Secondary Mass, of the Aspen Municipal Code and the dimensional requirements of Section 26.710.040; and WHEREAS, Section 26.410.020(C) of the Aspen Municipal Code provides that if an application is found by Community Development Department staff to be inconsistent with any item of the Residential Design Standards, the applicant may either amend the application or appeal staff s findings to the Design Review Appeal Board pursuant to Chapter 26.222, Design Review Appeal Board; and WHEREAS, pursuant to Section 26.410.020(B) of the Aspen Municipal Code, the applicant submitted a request for a variance from Standard 26.410.040(B)(1) of the Aspen Municipal Code to the Design Review Appeal Board as it applies to secondary mass and the dimensional requirements of Section 26.710.040; and WHEREAS, all applications for appeal from the Residential Design Standards of Section 26.410.040 must meet one of the following review standards in order for the Design Review Appeal Committee or other decision making administrative body to grant an exception, namely the proposal must: a) yield greater compliance with the goals of the Aspen Area Community Plan; b) more effectively address the issue or problem a given standard or provision responds to; or c) be clearly necessary for reasons of fairness related to unusual site specific constraints; and WHEREAS, Section 26.314 of the Aspen Municipal Code provides that an application for a variance from the dimensional requirements of the code can be reviewed by the Planning and Zoning Commission if it is part of a consolidated process; and WHEREAS, in order to authorize a variance from the dimensional requirements of Title 26, the appropriate decision making body shall make a finding that the following three (3) circumstances exist: 1. The grant of variance will be generally consistent with the purposes, goals, objectives, and policies of the Aspen Area Community Plan and Chapter 26 of the Aspen Municipal Code. 3. The grant of variance is the minimum variance that will make possible the reasonable use of the parcel, building or structure. 3. The literal interpretation and enforcement of the terms of Chapter 26 of the Aspen Municipal Code would deprive the applicant of rights commonly enjoyed by other parcels in the same zone district, and would cause the applicant unnecessary hardship or practical difficulty. In determining that the applicant's rights would be deprived absent a variance, the Board considered certain special conditions and circumstances which are unique to the parcel, building or structure, which are not applicable to other parcels, structures or buildings in the same zone district and which do not result from the actions of the applicant. WHEREAS, during a duly noticed public hearing at a regular meeting on October 3, 2000, the Planning and Zoning Commission, which also served as the Design Review Appeal Board, approved a variance from the Secondary Mass standard of Section 26.410.040(B)(1) of the Aspen Municipal Code as it applies to secondary mass for 309 N. Third by a vote of 5 to 0 and denied variances from the dimensional requirements of Chapter 26 of the Aspen Municipal Code by a vote of 3 to 2, without conditions, NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED by the City of Aspen Planning and Zoning Commission, also serving as the Design Review Appeals Committee and Board of Adjustment: Section 1 That a proposed variance for a single-family residence at 309 N. Third Street, Aspen, Colorado, is approved pursuant to Section 26.410.040(B)(1), Secondary Mass, of the Residential Design Standards finding that a variance is clearly necessary for reasons of fairness related to unusual or site specific constraints. 2 Section 2 That the proposed five (5) foot rear yard setback variance, and ten (10) foot combined front and rear yard setback variance for a single-family residence at 309 N. Third, Aspen, Colorado, is denied pursuant to Section 26.710.040(D)(4), Minimum Front and Rear Yard, finding that none of the review standards have been met. Section 3 All material representations and commitments made by the applicant pursuant to the development proposal approvals as herein awarded, whether in public hearing or documentation presented before the Planning and Zoning Commission or City Council, are hereby incorporated in such plan development approvals and the same shall be complied with as if fully set forth herein, unless amended by an authorized entity. Section 4 This Ordinance shall not effect any existing litigation and shall not operate as an abatement of any action or proceeding now pending under or by virtue of the ordinances repealed or amended as herein provided, and the same shall be conducted and concluded under such prior ordinances. Section i If any section, subsection, sentence, clause, phrase, or portion of this Resolution is for any. reason held invalid or unconstitutional in a court of competent jurisdiction, such portion shall be deemed a separate, distinct and independent provision and shall not affect the validity of the remaining portions thereof. APPROVED by the Commission at its regular meeting on October 3, 2000. APPROVED AS TO FORM: PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION: City Attorney ATTEST: City Clerk gAhome\saraho\p1anning\drac\3 09nthird Robert Blaich, Chair 130 S. Galena St. Aspen CO 81611 (970) 920-5090 (970) 920-5439, fax 0 To: Paul Taddune From: Sarah Oates Fax: 925-9199 Pages: 3 Phone: Date: October 23, 2000 Re: 2 Cases CC: ❑ Urgent ❑ For Review ❑ Please Comment ❑ Please Reply ❑ Please Recycle e Comments: Paul —Attached please find information on 2 different cases. I wrote a letter to the Burrows on July 27, 2000 re. their BOA case. Apparently they never received a copy so here is one for the file. Also, attached is a notice for the Nov. 2, 2000 BOA meeting for 309 N. Third. There is nothing in the code that prohibits the owners for reapplying to the BOA for the variance, and that is how they plan to precede. NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING CASE #00-12 Before the City of Aspen Board of Adjustment TO ALL PROPERTY OWNERS AFFECTED BY THE REQUESTED ZONING OR USE VARIANCE DESCRIBED BELOW: Pursuant to the Official Code of Aspen of June 25, 1962, as amended, a public hearing will be held in the BASEMENT MEETING ROOM, City Hall, Aspen, Colorado, (or at such other place as the meeting may be then adjourned) to consider an application filed with the said Board of Adjustment requesting authority for variance from the provisions of the Zoning Ordinance, Chapter 26, Official Code of Aspen. All persons affected by the proposed variance are invited to appear and state their views, protests or objections. If you cannot appear personally at such meeting, you are urged to state your views by letter, particularly if you have objection to such variance, as the Board of Adjustment will give serious consideration to the opinions of surrounding property owners and others affected in deciding whether to grant or deny the request for variance. Particulars of the hearing and requested variance are as follows: Date and Time of Meeting: Date: November 2, 2000 Time: 4:00 P.M. Owner for Variance: Name: Mel and Marilyn Gallant Address: 309 N. Third Street Aspen, CO 81611 Location or description of property: 309 N. Third Street, Lots R & S, Block 35 Variances Requested: Applicant for Variance: Earl Anderson Anderson Design Studio 33 Sagewood Court Basalt, CO 81621 The applicant is requesting a five (5) foot rear yard setback variance and a ten (10) foot combined front and rear yard setback variance for the construction of a single-family home and Accessory Dwelling Unit. Will applicant be represented by Counsel: YES: X NO: The City of Aspen Board of Adjustment 130 S. Galena Street Aspen, CO 81611 Charles Paterson, Chairman