Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutcoa.lu.Landow.915 E Durant\0`000 - je* - c LANDOW SUBDIVISION EXEMPTION v 915 E. Durant E EI F— w z -i CIO Ir W W 3 w M.H. ---fi"CIP SCALED FROM CITY MAPS. _R_A_( 0 __ V E -SEWER LINE r CURB d GUTTER _ KtCAK NU UAH (BENT) A L L E Y POtiEH,T.V TEL.E. L'. NES i I A 1 r% kif n1 Ir%t Jr�in FOUND REBAR W/ PLAS.CAP L.S. 9184 FOUND: REBAR W/ PLAS. CAP CAN NOT MAKE OUT NUMBER nal 0 5 10 20 30 40 SOFT. SCALE; I°= 10' BASIS OF BEARING: FOUND MONUMENTS AS SHOWN SURVEYOR_�5 ,CERTIFICATE _ I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS MAP ACCURATELY DEPICTS A SURVEY MADE UNDER MY SUPERVISION ON APRIL4,1980, OF LOTS A, B 81 C , BLOCK 119, CITY OF ASPEN, COLORADO.THE ONE STORY HOUSE WAS FOUND TO BE LOCATED ENTIRELY WITHIN THE BOUNDARY LINES OF THE ABOVE DESCRIBED PROPERTY. THE LOCATION AND DIMENSIONS OF ALL BUILDINGS, IMPROVE- MENTS, EASEMENTS, RIGHTS -OF -WAY IN EVIDENCE OR KNOWN TO ME AND ENCROACHMENTS BY OR ON THESE PREMISES ARE ACCURATELY SHOWN. ALPINE SURVEYS by: 1,-AMES F. RESER APRI L 7 1980 L.S. 9184 _S �_tyr NOTES_t���sr �,� I. EXISTING BUILDING TO BE REMOVED. 9 i 8 i MLr11VG JVRVG 1 J P.0.Box 1730 Aspen,Colorado 81611 303.925.2688 JVRVGI GU• 1; HF r%1 t- IUOV rD DRAFTED: 4 APRI L 1980 DMA REVISIONS: TITLE: EXEMPTION PLAT LOTS A, B 81 C BLOCK 119 CITY OF ASPEN,COLORADO CLIENT: SCHWARTZBACH SHEET NO.: I of I 6"CI P SCALED FROM CITY MAP fi _ SEWER LINE CURB 8 GUTTER D U R A N T FOUND REBAR NO CAP ADDED CAP - FOUND REBAR WI PLAS. CAP CANNOT MAKE OUT (75.0' WIDE) IV 10- Ulj I I YV bU.UU A V E. A L L E Y PP • POWER -TV 8 TELE LINES 2 FF0t� ND: REBAR WSPLASCAP I1 PLAS. CAP 8 m NOTE S: ].EXISTING BUILDING TO BE REMOVED. i I-- 0 5 10 20 30 40 5OFT. SCALE; I"= 10' BASIS OF BEARING: FOUND CITYMONUMENT NWC0R.BLK.119TO FOUND REBARW/PLAS.CAP L.S.12707 SW COR. BLK.119 314°50'49"W SURVEYORS CERTIFICATE HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS MAP ACCURATELY DEPICTS A SURVEY MADE UNDER MY SUPERVISION ON APRIL 4 1980 OF LOTS D & E , BLOCK 1 19 , CITY OF ASPEN, COLORA,DO. TPE ONE STORY HOUSE WAS FOUND TO BE LOCATED ENTIRELY WITHIN THE BOUNDARY LINES OF THE ABOVE DESCRIBED PROPERTY. ?HE LOCATION AND DLMENSIONS OF ALL BUILDINGS, IMPROVEMENTS, EASEMENTS, RIGHTS -OF-WAY IN EVIDENCE OR KNOWN TO ME AND ENCROACHMENTS BY OR ON THESE PREMISES ARE ACCURATELY SHOWN. ALPINE SURVEYS by: f AMES F RESER APRIL 7 , 1980 L.S. 9184 ALPINE SURVEYS P0. Box 1730 Aspen,Colorado 81611 303.925.2688 SUttVtYtU: `+ At -"IL I ytSV t'b DRAFTED: 7 APRIL 1980 DMA REVISIONS: I I I Lt: tAtIVIr I IU1v rLA I LOTS D & E BLOCK 119 CITY OF ASPEN, COLORADO vvo ivv.• ( '- I -L CLIENT: LANDOW SHEET NO.: I of I 6" C I P SCALED FROM CITY MAP SEWER LINE__ ------ - ��MH — CURB 9 GUTTER D U R A N T FOUND REBAR NO CAP ADDED CAP L. FOUND REBAR Wl PLAS. CAP CANNOT MAKE OUT N A V E. (75.0' WIDE) A L L E Y PP POWER -TV 8 TELE LINES • ALAS CAP 11 PLAS. CAP 8 4 NOTE S: I. EXISTING BUILDING TO BE REMOVED, nal 0 5 10 20 30 40 50 F T. SCALE: I = 10 BASIS OF BEARING: FOUND CITY MONUMENT NW COR. BLK. 119 TO FOJND REBAR W/PLAS.CAP L.S.12707 SW COR. BLK.119 S14050`49" W S_U_RVE OWS CERTIFICATE= HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS MAP ACCURATELY DEPICTS A SURVEY MADE UNDER MY SUPERVISION ON APRIL 4 , 1980 OF LOTS D & E , BLOCK 119 , CITY OF ASPEN, COLORADO. THE ONE STORY HOUSE WAS FOUND TO BE LOCATED ENTIRELY WITHIN THE BOUNDARY LINES OF THE ABOVE DESCRIBED PROPERTY. THE LOCATION AND DLMENSIONS OF ALL BUILDINGS, I MPROVEMENTS, EASEMENTS, RIGHTS -OF -WAY IN EVIDENCE OR KNOWN TO ME AND ENCROACHMENTS BY OR ON THESE PREMISES ARE ACCURATELY SHOWN. ALPINE SURVEYS by AF RESER APRIL 7 ,1980 LMES L.S. 9184 � =. , `N'T a 0 0 ALPINE SURVEYS P0. Box 1730 Aspen,Colorado 81611 303.925.2688 ci m/r7vF11. 4 APPII 19RO PR DRAFTED: 7 APRIL 1980 DMA REVISIONS: TITLE: EXEMPTION PLAT LOTS D & E BLOCK 119 CITY OF ASPEN, COLORADO JOB NO.: 79- 7-2 n1 If -KIT- I AAIf1PUA/ SHEET NO.: I of I • M ASPEN/PITKIN PLANNING OFFICE 130 South Galena Street Aspen, Colorado 81611 LAND USE APPLICATION FEES County 00100 — 63711 09009 — 00000 Subdivision/PUD 63712 Special Review 63713 P&Z Review Only 63714 Detailed Review 63715 Final Plat 63716 Special Approval 63717 Specially Assigned City 00100 — 63721 09009 — 00000 Conceptual Application 63722 Preliminary Application 63723 Final Application 63724 Exemption 63725 Rezoning 63726 Conditional Use PLANNING OFFICE SALES 00100 — 63061 09009 — 00000 County Land Use Sales 63062 GMP Sales 63063 Almanac Sales Copy Fees Other Name: ik"" y Project: -4'40"Ct 8 rX k -7 Al Address: kQ"'A�� . Y d20 Phone: 3 -80o O Check No. / d 9 Date: 7�0� Receipt No. P CITY OF AS*N ,& qw MEMO FROM SUNNY VANN -Z. 5c,r3-,/5<�-7- 7� 1-- 4 y ,-7111- or 20 2b) CITY OF ASPEN 130 so4 h galena street aspen, Colorado 81611 MEMORANDUM DATE: May 23, 1980 TO: Sunny Va FROM: Ron.,Stock RE: Landow S�Uivision Exemption If the above entitled subdivision exemption is granted, the approval should be conditioned upon the applicant meeting the following requirements of Section 20-22 of the Municipal Code of the City of Aspen: [ ] Notice and option provisions to current tenants [x] Each unit restricted to six-month minimum leases with no more than two snorter tenan- cies in a calendar year. RWS:mc 10 No. 12-80 1. DATE SUBMITTED: 2. APPLICANT: CASELOAD SUMMARY SHEET City of Aspen 5/15/80 STAFF: Sunny Vann Nathan Landow 3. REPRESENTATIVE: Chuck Brandt, Holland & Hart 925-3476 --_ 4. PROJECT NAME: Landow Subdivision Exemption 5. LOCATION: 6. TYPE OF APPLICATION: Rezoning Subdivision P.U.D. ,Exception Special Review ✓ _Exemption Growth Management 70:30 HPC Residential Bonus 1. REFERRALS: Attorney Engineering Dept Housing Water City Electric Sanitation District Fire Marshal Parks Holy Cross Electric Mountain Bell 8. REVIEW REQUIRFMENTS: /5�/z Stream Margin 8040 Greenline View Plane Conditional Use -----Other School District Rocky Mtn. Nat. Gas State Highway Dept. Other Approved J 9. DISPOSITION: P & Z- ,/ C4 �py Denied _ Date ` � n Loy �a w l!-,e- S _ Council Approved__ Denied DateS)� PAk �F vi$ 0 w\.0 A� pk,-Jo. oF- P --;?- 10. ROUTING: J Attorney /Buiiding Engineering Other 1101.L,XND & I 8.wr ATTORNEYS AT LAW 555 SEVENTEENTH STRF'ET TELEPHONE 575,8000 SUITE 2900 CABLE ADDRESS AREA CODE 303 DENVER.COLORADO HOLHART.DENVER MAILING ADORLSS TELECOPIER 1303) 575-$261 P.O. BOX 8749 DENVER. COLORADO 80201 CHARLES T. BRANDT PLEASE REPLY TO (303) 925-3476 434 E COOPER STREET. ASPEN. COLORADO 81611 TELEPHONE 925-3476 AREA CODE 303 May 7, 1980 HAND DELIVERY Planning Commission City of Aspen 130 S. Galena Aspen, Colo. 81611 Re: Application of Nathan Landow for Exemption from Aspen Subdivision Regulations Sirs: Enclosed please find the above -referenced Application, together with our check in the amount of $50.00 in payment of the required Exemption Fee and 3 copies of a plat of this property. Please set this matter for consideration by the Planning and Zoning Commission at the earliest con- venient date. Very truly yours, Charles T. Brandt for Holland & Hart CTB/dv Enclosure cc: Nathan Landow 1 APPLICATION FOR EXEMPTION FROM ASPEN SUBDIVISION REGULATIONS Pursuant to Section 20-19 of the Municipal Code of the City of Aspen, Colorado, the undersigned hereby submits to the Aspen Planning Commission this written application for exemption from the definition of a subdivision as set forth in the Aspen, Colorado, Subdivision Regulations. The applicant is the owner of the following -described real estate located in the City of Aspen, County of Pitkin, State of Colorado, to wit: Lots D and E, Block 119, City and Townsite of Aspen. The existing single family dwelling on the above described real property has been removed. The applicant intends to construct a residential duplex on the real property and desires to condominiumize the duplex structure into two separate condominium units. The applicant respect- fully requests exemption from the definition of a subdivi- sion for the following reasons: 1. There are special circumstances or conditions affecting the subject property such that the strict application of the provisions of this chapter would deprive the applicant of the reasonable use of his land. Condominiumization of new structures in the City of Aspen has uni- formly been granted by the City of Aspen subject to the imposition of certain conditions. To compel the applicant to process his condomin- iumization under the applicable subdivision regulations would be an undue burden and incon- sistent with the established precedent. 2. The exemption is necessary for the preservation and enjoyment of a substantial property right of the applicant. For the reasons stated above, the pursuit of subdivision approval would hinder the applicant in offering one of the two duplex condominium units for sale and would be incon- sistent with the precedent established on such matters. 3. Granting the exemption will not be detrimental to the public welfare or injurious to other property in the area in which the subject property is situated. The supply of low and moderate income housing will not be reduced by the con- dominiumization of a newly -constructed duplex. The established precedent of exempting condo- miniumization of new structures from the Subdivision Regulation evidences recognition that'the public welfare and other_ property rights are not detrimentaly affected by such condomin- iumization. 4. The division of land here involved is not within the intent and purpose of the Subdivision Regu- lation. That purpose is "to assist the orderly, efficient and integrated development of the City of Aspen; to insure the proper_ distribution of population and coordinate the need for public services with governmental improvement programs; to encourage well -planned subdivision by setting standards for subdivision design and improve- ments; to improve land records and survey monu- ments by establishing standards for surveys, plans and plats; to safeguard the interests of the public and the subdivider and provide con- sumer protection for the purchaser.; to acquire desirable public areas; and to otherwise promote the health, safety and general welfare of the residents of and visitors to the City of Aspen." Section 20-2, Purpose and Intent. Condominiumi- zation of a newly -constructed duplex does not compromise the above -listed concerns intended to be addressed by the Subdivision Regulations, and is thus not within the intent and purpose of those regulations. 5. Section 20-22, Condominiumization, does not apply to this case because a new duplex struc- tured is to be constructed, so that tenant displacement and reduction of low and moderate income housing will not occur if the duplex is condominiumized. Respectfully submitted, Charles T. Brandt, Attorney for Nathan Landow - 2 - 0 • MEMORANDUM TO: Ron Stock, City Attorney Dan McArthur, City Engineer FROM: Sunny Vann, Planning Office RE: Landow Subdivision Exemption DATE: May 12, 1980 The attached is an application for subdivision exemption submitted by Nathan Landow for the property located on Block 119, on East Durant Avenue. Thi item is scheduled to come before Aspen Planning and Zoning Commission on Jun 17, 1980; therefore, may I please have your written comments no later than May 27, 1980? (The early due -date for your referral takes into account my vacation the first two weeks of June.) Thank you. HOLLAND & HART WASHINGTON, O. C. OFFICE 1875 EYE STREET, N. W. SUITE 1200 WASHINGTON, O. C. 20006 TELEPHONE(202) 4615-7340 CHARLES T. BRANDT (303) 925-3476 Mr. Ronald Stock City Attorney City of Aspen 130 S. Galena Aspen, Colorado 81611 Dear Ron: ATTORNEYS AT LAW MOUNTAIN PLAZA BUILDING 434 EAST COOPER STREET ASPEN, COLORADO 81611 TELEPHONE (303) 925-3476 August 26, 1980' DENV ER,COLORADO OFFICE 555 SEVENTEENTH STREET SUITE 2900 DENVER,COLORAQO 80202 TELEPHONE(303) 575-8000` Re: Landow/Schwartzbach Subdivision Exempt Applications (Condominiumization of 2 duplexes presently under construction) I am writing to set forth the position of Messrs. Landow and Schwartzbach with respect to the referenced subdivision exemption request. The applications were recommended for approval by the Planning Office on June 9, 1980, and were considered by the Planning and Zoning Commission on June 17, 1980. At that time the applications were tabled pending consideration of the issue of whether the proposed condominiumizations will reduce the supply of low and moderate income housing. Sunny Vann, Jim Rentz and I have agreed to table the applications pending rece at your opinion on the applicability of Section 20-22 of the Aspen Municipal Code to new structures. -. The acquisition and rental history of the two properties is a$ follows. Nathan Landow acquired Lots D and E, Block 119, in September of 1978. Mr. Schwartzbach acquired the adjacent 3 lots, A, B and C, Block 119, in April, 1979. Since their acquisition the one-story houses existing on both prop- erties have been rented at rates within the low, moderate, and':,, middle housing price guidelines. The tenants were given notice to vacate the premises as of April of 1980. Following vacation by the tenants the existing buildings 7W were demolished pursuant to building permits for such demo- lition. Prior to demolition, the owners had offered the house HOLLAND & HART Mr. Ronald Stock August 26, 1980 Page Two to City of Aspen, to be moved and used as employee housing elsewhere. The City refused this offer. According to Jim_ Rentz, the houses were not habitable because they did not meet the building or thermal codes, and his office determined that bringing the buildings up to code would be prohibitively expensive. Messrs. Landow and Schwartzbach wish to condominiumize the duplexes presently being constructed on their property. Objections have been raised to these exemptions on the grounds that since the owners required their tenants to vacate the houses, they failed to demonstrate that condominiumization will not reduce the supply of low and moderate income housing, as required by the Aspen Municipal Code Section 20-22(c). It is our position that Section 20-22(c) is a condominium conversion ordinance and as such does not apply to condo- miniumization of new structures. That section requires an applicant to demonstrate that "approval will not reduce the supply of low and moderate income housing." What is requested, however, is the approval for condominiumization of two new buildings. In short, new buildings without a rental history cannot possibly reduce the supply of low and moderate income dousing. In addition, other language of Section 20-22(c) of the Code, delineating criteria for determination of whether a particular conversion will reduce housing supply, reinforces the conclusion that this section of the code applies to condominium conversions and not to condominiumization of new structures. Section 20-22(3) requires that existing tenants be given written notice when their units is offered for sale..." Section 20-22(c) (1) refers to "tenants displacement as a result of the conversion." (Emphasis supplied) Section 20-22(c) (4) refers toreases in the rental price of the unit after condominiumization. Moreover, Section 20-22 contains "lawfull displacement," which applies Ow question. The tenants were required so that they could be demolished. T h 0 w HOLLAND & HART Mr. Ronald Stock August 26, 1980 Page Three Municipal Code, Section 7-142 (a) provides "it shall be unlawful for any person, firm or corporation to . . . use, occupy or maintain any building or structure in the City c cause the same to be done, contrary to or in violation of any of the provisions of this code." Under this provisior continued occupancy by the tenants of this sub -code buildi was unlawful. Thus any displacement of tenants unlawfully occupying the building constituted "lawful displacement" under Code Section 20-22(c)(2), and makes evidence of such displacement irrelevant to a determination of whether the subdivision exemption sought for the new duplex units woul reduce the supply of low and moderate income housing. I would be happy to meet with you to discuss this question further should you wish. Your prompt opinion the foregoing issues would be greatly appreciated. Charles T. Brandt for Rolland & Hart CTB/fh cc: Nathan Landow Saul TI. Schwartzbach Sunny Vann +- " on • • MEMORANDUM TO: Aspen Planning and Zoning Commission Aspen City Council FROM: Sunny Vann, Planning Office RE: Landow Subdivision Exemption DATE: June 9, 1980 Zoning: R/MF, Reside t'al/Multi-Fa ' y Location: 915 East Du ant, (Lots D E, City and Townsite of Aspen Lot Size: 6,000 square feet Rental History: Not applicable; proposed duplex. The previously existing single family unit has been removed. Housing Director's Comments: Not applicable. Engineering Comments: The Engineering Department recommends approval of the applicant's request provided that the owner/appli- cant complies with the following conditions: 1) That the owner/applicant submit a site plan showing: A) Sidewalk along Durant Avenue. B) Parking as required by the Municipal Code. C) A 10' x 10' electrical easement in the south- east corner of Lot E to accommodate a trans- former in the event the electric lines in the alley are undergrounded. D) Show new construction indicating setbacks. E) Indicate individual units and any areas reserved for common use (ie. shared mechanical rooms, utility service areas, parking, etc.). 2) That the owner/applicant be required to construct a 5` sidewalk along Durant Avenue. Attorney's Comments: If the applicant's request for subdivision exemption is granted, the approval should be conditioned upon the applicant restricting each unit to six-month mini- mum leases with no more than two shorter tenancies in a calendar year, pursuant to Section 20-22 of the Muni- cipal Code. Planning Office Recommendation: The Planning Office recommends approval of the appli- cant's request for subdivision exemption subject to: 1) The applicant complying with the conditions des- cribed in the Engineering Department's memorandum of June 4, 1980, as quoted above, prior to the issuance of a building permit, 2) The applicant meeting the requirement of six-month minimum leases, pursuant to Section 20-22, and 3) The proposed duplex complying with the bedroom:lot square footage limitation of the R/MF Zone dis- D Memo: Landow Sub. Exemption June 9, 1980 Page Two trict as described in Section 24-3.4, "On sites 9,000 sq. ft. or less, the following square foot- age requirements; 1,200 - 1 bedroom, 2,000 - 2 bed- room, 3,000 - 3 bedrooms." Therefore, that the duplex units be limited to three bedrooms per unit. P & Z Action: The Planning and Zoning Commission concurred with the Planning Office recommendation at its November 18, 1980 meeting. Council Action: Should Council also concur, the appropriate motion is as follows: "I move to approve the Landow request for subdivision exemption for the purpose of condominiumization sub- ject to the following conditions: 1. The applicant complying with the conditions des- cribed in the Engineering Department's memorandum dated June 4, 1980. 2. The applicant complying with the six-month minimum lease restriction of Section 20-22. • • HOLLAND & HART ATTORNEYS AT LAW 555 SEVENTEENTH STREET TELEPHONE 575-8000 SUITE 2900 AREA CODE 303 DENVER,COLORADO MAILING ADDRESS. P.O. BOX 8749 DENVER. COLORADO 80201 CHARLES T. BRANDT PLEASE REPLY TO. (303) 925-3476 434 E COOPER STREET. ASPEN. COLORADO 81611 TELEPHONE 925-3476 AREA CODE 303 May 7, 1980 HAND DELIVERY Planning Commission City of Aspen 130 S. Galena Aspen, Colo. 81611 Re: Application of Nathan Landow for Exemption from Aspen Subdivision Regulations Sirs: CABLE ADDRESS HOLHART.DENVER TELECOPIER (303) 575-8261 Enclosed please find the above -referenced Application, together with our check in the amount of $50.00 in payment of the required Exemption Fee and 3 copies of a plat of this property. Please set this matter for consideration by the Planning and Zoning Commission at the earliest con- venient date. Very truly yours, Charles T. Brandt for Holland & Hart CTB/dv Enclosure cc: Nathan Landow • APPLICATION FOR EXEMPTION FROM ASPEN SUBDIVISION REGULATIONS Pursuant to Section 20-19 of the Municipal Code of the City of Aspen, Colorado, the undersigned hereby submits to the Aspen Planning Commission this written application for exemption from the definition of a subdivision as set forth in the Aspen, Colorado, Subdivision Regulations. The applicant is the owner of the following -described real estate located in the City of Aspen, County of Pitkin, State of Colorado, to wit: Lots D and E, Block 119, City and Townsite of Aspen. ��� C (�wnr�r V4"F The existing single family dwelling on the above described real property has been removed. The applicant intends to construct a residential duplex on the real property and desires to condominiumize the duplex structure into two separate condominium units. The applicant respect- fully requests exemption from the definition of a subdivi- sion for the following reasons: 1. There are special circumstances or conditions affecting the subject property such that the strict application of the provisions of this chapter would deprive the applicant of the reasonable use of his land. Condominiumization of new structures in the City of Aspen has uni- formly been granted by the City of Aspen subject to the imposition of certain conditions. To compel the applicant to process his condomin- iumization under the applicable subdivision regulations would be an undue burden and incon- sistent with the established precedent. 2. The exemption is necessary for the preservation and enjoyment of a substantial property right of the applicant. For the reasons stated above, the pursuit of subdivision approval would hinder the applicant in offering one of the two duplex condominium units for sale and would be incon- sistent with the precedent established on such matters. 3. Granting the exemption will not be detrimental to the public welfare or injurious to other property in the area in which the subject property is situated. The supply of low and moderate income housing will not be reduced by the con- dominiumization of a newly -constructed duplex. The established precedent of exempting condo- miniumization of new structures from the Subdivision Regulation evidences recognition that the public welfare and other property rights are not detrimentaly affected by such condomin- iumization. 0 0 4. The division of land here involved is not within the intent and purpose of the Subdivision Regu- lation. That purpose is "to assist the orderly, efficient and integrated development of the City of Aspen; to insure the proper distribution of population and coordinate the need for public services with governmental improvement programs; to encourage well -planned subdivision by setting standards for subdivision design and improve- ments; to improve land records and survey monu- ments by establishing standards for surveys, plans and plats; to safeguard the interests of the public and the subdivider and provide con- sumer protection for the purchaser; to acquire desirable public areas; and to otherwise promote the health, safety and general welfare of the residents of and visitors to the City of Aspen." Section 20-2, Purpose and Intent. Condominiumi- zation of a newly -constructed duplex does not compromise the above -listed concerns intended to be addressed by the Subdivision Regulations, and is thus not within the intent and purpose of those regulations. 5. Section 20-22, Condominiumization, does not apply to this case because a new duplex struc- tured is to be constructed, so that tenant displacement and reduction of low and moderate income housing will not occur if the duplex is condominiumized. Respectfully submitted, /✓ Charles T. Brandt, Attorney for Nathan Landow - 2 - MEMORANDUM TO: Sunny Vann, Planning Office FROM: Jay Hammond, Engineering Office DATE: June 4, 1980 RE: Landow Subdivision Exemption, Lots D and E, Block 119,0.A.T. Having reviewed the above application for subdivision exemption and made a site inspection, the Engineering Department recommends the following: 1) That the owner/applicant submit a site plan showing: A) Sidewalk along Durant Avenue. B) Parking as required by the municipal code. C) A 10' x 10' electrical easement in the southeast corner of lot E to accomodate a transformer in the event the electric lines in the alley are undergrounded. D) Show new construction indicating setbacks. E) Indicate individual units and any areas reserved for com- mon use (ie. shared mechanical rooms, utility service areas, parking, etc.). 2) That the owner/applicant be required to construct a 5' side- walk along Durant Avenue. The Engineering Department recommends approval of the Landow Sub- division Exemption provided the owner/applicant complies with the a- bove conditions.