HomeMy WebLinkAboutLandUseCase.CR.Smuggler.0060.2004.ASLUCASE NUMBER
PARCEL ID NUMBER
PROJECT ADDRESS
PLANNER
CASE DESCRIPTION
THE CITY OF ASPEN
City of Aspen Community Development Dept.
01900, .Zao �. 4 5 & u
cgf�qrs c.�E
e0uN7y I2EFER5'ka(,,�
K9-EScc- 11 -T ) 0 q / * ,4 274R0
REPRESENTATIVE SU t4A/,1/E (,UpLGF
DATE OF FINAL ACTION
CLOSED BY Denise Driscoll
S M U 6-6-1, E
J?EVIES
MEMORANDUM
TO: Suzanne Wolff, County Community Development Department
THRU: Joyce Allgaier, City of Aspen Interim Community Development Deputy Director
FROM: Christopher Lee, City.of Aspen Planner 1
RE: Smuggler Result 1041 Hazard Review, Conceptual Submission, Scenic Overlay
Review, Special Review, GMQS Exemption and Modification of County Road
Maintenance Classification (PID 2737-074-00-042; Case P160-04)
DATE: October 28, 2004
The City Planning Staff reviewed the proposal to construct a single-family residence and has the
following concerns:
1. The City Planning Staff observed that the structure will be in a very prominent
location on Smuggler Mountain near the apex of all existing development. Given
the high visibility of the site from town, Staff recommends that the county require
all building materials to be non -reflective and painted with dark earth -tone colors
to minimize the visual impact of the structure.
2. The City Planning Staff observed that the size of the surrounding residences are
7,546 square feet, 6,812 square feet, and 4,986 square feet (average = 6,448
square feet). This is considerably less than the 8,250 square feet proposed for this
structure. Also, the nature of the Result Claim creates a non -conforming lot that
is smaller than normal (7.1 acres instead of the standard 10 acres). Thus, Staff
recommends that the second TDR be denied so that the structure can be no larger
Than 5,750 square feet. Staff believes that a smaller structure will better
compliment the neighboring residential units and the constricted lot size.
3. The City Planning Staff observed that much less land would need to be disturbed,
and consequently reclaimed, by slightly shifting and compressing the disturbance
envelope in a northeasterly direction so that the disturbance envelope becomes
much closer in size to the currently proposed building setback (as illustrated in
Exhibit A). In addition to shifting the building envelope, the City Planning Staff
would recommend that the County require the Applicant to fence off the building
envelope during construction to prohibit unnecessary disturbance.
Thank you for the opportunity to provide comment on this County application.
File Edit Record Navigate Form Reports Tab Help
r
5Q C is.
Conditions Sub Permits
Main
Valuation Public Comment
Routing Status Arch/Eng Parcels Custom Fields J Fees Fee Summary Actions 1 Routing History
Permit Type
Permit # 0060.2004.ASLU h'j
Address ------ -- - --- ---
Apt/Suite ------
a/
City
State zip- -
Permit Information -
Master Permit
Routing Queue aslu Applied 09I28I2004 J
Project [PITKIN COUNTY REFERRAL J
Status (pending Approved J
Description SMUGGLER RESULT 1041 HAZARD REVIEW
— Issued
' E
Final F Jal
Submitted SUZANNE WOLFF 920 5093
Clock Running Days 1 0 Expires 09I23I2005 Ell
r Visible on the web?
Permit ID: F— 31720
L1
-Owner
Last Name SMUGGLER RIDGE ASSO First Name
Phone
fv Owner -Is Applicant?
Applicant --- - -- - _
----------- - ------
Last Name SMUGGLER RIDGE ASSO ,�-J, First Name —
1 oil